[Federal Register: September 30, 2009 (Volume 74, Number 188)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Page 50129-50137]
[DOCID:fr30se09-6]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY

40 CFR Part 82

[EPA-HQ-OAR-2003-0118; FRL-8959-2]
RIN 2060-AG12

Protection of Stratospheric Ozone: Notice 24 for Significant New
Alternatives Policy Program

AGENCY: Environmental Protection Agency (EPA).

ACTION: Determination of acceptability.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: This Determination of Acceptability expands the list of
acceptable substitutes for ozone-depleting substances under the U.S.
Environmental Protection Agency's (EPA) Significant New Alternatives
Policy (SNAP) program. The determinations concern new substitutes for
use in the refrigeration and air conditioning and foam blowing sectors.

DATES: This determination is effective on September 30, 2009.

ADDRESSES: EPA has established a docket for this action under Docket ID

No. EPA-HQ-OAR-2003-0118 (continuation of Air Docket A-91-42). All
electronic documents in the docket are listed in the index at http://
www.regulations.gov. Although listed in the index, some information is
not publicly available, i.e., Confidential Business Information (CBI)
or other information whose disclosure is restricted by statute.
Publicly available docket materials are available either electronically
at http://www.regulations.gov or in hard copy at the EPA Air Docket
(No. A-91-42), EPA/DC, EPA West, Room 3334, 1301 Constitution Ave.,
NW., Washington, DC. The Public Reading Room is open from 8:30 a.m. to
4:30 p.m., Monday through Friday, excluding legal holidays. The
telephone number for the Public Reading Room is<PHONE_NUMBER>, and the
telephone number for the Air Docket is<PHONE_NUMBER>.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Margaret Sheppard by telephone at
(202) 343-9163, by facsimile at<PHONE_NUMBER>, by e-mail at
<EMAIL_ADDRESS>or by mail at U.S. Environmental Protection
Agency, Mail Code 6205J, 1200 Pennsylvania Avenue, NW., Washington, DC
20460. Overnight or courier deliveries should be sent to the office
location at 1310 L Street, NW., 10th floor, Washington, DC 20005.
    For more information on the Agency's process for administering the
SNAP program or criteria for evaluation of substitutes, refer to the
original SNAP rulemaking published in the Federal Register on March 18,
1994 (59 FR 13044). Notices and rulemakings under the SNAP program, as
well as other EPA publications on protection of stratospheric ozone,
are available at EPA's Ozone Depletion World Wide Web site at http://
www.epa.gov/ozone/ including the SNAP portion at http://www.epa.gov/
ozone/snap/.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

I. Listing of New Acceptable Substitutes
    A. Refrigeration and Air Conditioning
    B. Foam Blowing
II. Section 612 Program
    A. Section 612 Statutory and Regulatory Background
    B. Regulatory History
Appendix A--Summary of Decisions for New Acceptable Substitutes

I. Listing of New Acceptable Substitutes

    This section presents EPA's most recent acceptable listing
decisions for substitutes in the refrigeration and air conditioning and
foam blowing sectors. For copies of the full list of ozone depleting
substance (ODS) substitutes in all industrial sectors, visit EPA's
Ozone Depletion Web site at http://www.epa.gov/ozone/snap/lists/
index.html.
    The sections below discuss each substitute listing in detail.
Appendix A contains a table summarizing today's listing decisions for
new substitutes. The statements in the ``Further Information'' column
in the table provide additional information, but are not legally
binding under section 612 of the Clean Air Act (CAA). In addition, the
``further information'' may not be a comprehensive list of other legal
obligations you may need to meet when using the substitute. Although
you are not required to follow recommendations in the ``further
information'' column of the table to use a substitute consistent with
section 612 of the CAA, EPA strongly encourages you to apply the
information when using these substitutes. In many instances, the
information simply refers to standard operating practices in existing
industry and/or building-code standards. However, some of these
statements may refer to obligations that are enforceable or binding
under Federal or State programs other than the SNAP program. Thus, many
of these statements, if adopted, would not require significant changes
to existing operating practices.
    You can find submissions to EPA for the use of the substitutes
listed in this document and other materials supporting the decisions in
this action in docket EPA-HQ-OAR-2003-0118 at http://
www.regulations.gov.

A. Refrigeration and Air Conditioning

1. R-744 (CO2)
    EPA's decision: R-744 (carbon dioxide or CO2) is acceptable for use
in new equipment as a substitute for chlorofluorocarbon (CFC)-12, R-
502, hydrochlorofluorocarbon (HCFC)-22 and HCFC blends in:
     Retail food refrigeration.
     Cold storage warehouses.
    R-744 is carbon dioxide (CO2), CAS ID 124-38-9.
You may find the submissions under Docket items EPA-HQ-OAR-2003-0118-
0205, -0207, -0208 and -0223 at http://www.regulations.gov.
    Environmental information: The ozone depletion potential (ODP) of
CO2 is zero. The 100-year global warming potential (GWP) of
CO2 is 1. The atmospheric lifetime of CO2 is
based upon a complex function of different processes in the carbon
cycle, with some portion of CO2 emissions expected to last
1000 years or longer (The International Panel on Climate Change [IPCC],
Fourth Assessment Report, Climate Change 2007: The Physical Science
Basis).
    EPA's regulations codified at 40 CFR part 82, subpart F exempt
CO2 refrigerant from the venting prohibition under section
608 (c)(2) of the Clean Air Act. This section and EPA's implementing
regulations prohibit the intentional venting or release of substitutes
for class I or class II ODSs used during the repair, maintenance,
service or disposal of refrigeration and air conditioning equipment
(i.e., appliances).
    CO2 is excluded from the definition of volatile organic
compound (VOC) under Clean Air Act regulations (see 40 CFR 51.100(s))
addressing the development of State Implementation Plans (SIPs) to
attain and maintain the national ambient air quality standards.
    Flammability information: CO2 is not flammable.
    Toxicity and exposure data: Potential health effects of this
substitute at lower concentrations include loss of concentration. The
substitute may also irritate the skin or eyes or cause frostbite. At
sufficiently high concentrations, it may cause central nervous system
depression or death. The substitute could cause asphyxiation, if air is
displaced by vapors in a confined space. These potential health effects
are common to many refrigerants.
    To protect against these potential health risks, CO2 has
an 8 hour/day, 40 hour/week permissible exposure limit (PEL) of 5000
ppm required by the Occupational Safety and Health Administration
(OSHA) and a 15-minute recommended short-term exposure limit (STEL) of
30,000 ppm established by the National Institute for Occupational
Safety and Health (NIOSH). EPA recommends that users follow all
requirements and recommendations specified in the Material Safety Data
Sheet (MSDS), in American Society for Heating and Refrigeration
Engineers (ASHRAE) standard 15, and other safety precautions common in
the refrigeration and air conditioning industry. We also recommend that
users of R-744 adhere to NIOSH's STEL and to ASHRAE 15 and we expect
that users will meet OSHA's PEL. EPA anticipates that users will be
able to meet the PEL and STEL and will be able to address potential
health risks by following requirements and recommendations in the
MSDSs, in ASHRAE 15, and other safety precautions common in the
refrigeration and air conditioning industry.
    Comparison to other refrigerants: CO2 (R-744) is not an
ozone depleter in contrast to the ozone-depleting substances which it
replaces. In its lack of risk for ozone depletion, R-744 is

comparable to a number of other substitutes for CFC-12, R-502, and
HCFC-22 and its blends, such as R-404A, R-407C, R-410A, and R-507. (R-
502 is a blend of 48.8% HCFC-22 and 51.2% CFC-115 by weight. CFC-12 has
an ODP of 1.0 and a GWP of 10,890; CFC-115 has an ODP of 0.44 and a GWP
of 7370; and HCFC-22 has an ODP of 0.05 and a GWP of 1810, according to
the Scientific Assessment of Ozone Depletion: 2006 prepared by the
World Meteorological Organization (WMO, 2006).) R-744 has a GWP of 1,
lower than that of other substitutes for CFC-12, R-502, and HCFC-22.
For example, the GWP of R-404A is about 3930, the GWP of R-407C is
about 3350, the GWP of R-410A is about 2100, and the GWP of R-507 is
about 4000. Flammability and toxicity risks are low, as discussed
above. Thus, we find that R-744 is acceptable because it does not pose
a greater overall risk to public health and the environment than the
other substitutes acceptable in the end uses listed above.
2. C6-Perfluoroketone
    EPA's decision: C6-perfluoroketone is acceptable as a substitute
for CFC-113 for use in new and retrofit equipment in non-mechanical
heat transfer.
    C6-perfluoroketone is also known as 1,1,1,2,2,4,5,5,5-nonafluoro-4-
(trifluoromethyl)-3-pentanone or FK-5-1-12mmy2 (CAS Reg. No. 756-13-8).
It is marketed under the trade name NovecTM 649. EPA
previously found this substitute acceptable in the fire protection
sector (December 20, 2002; 67 FR 77927). You may find the most recent
submission under Docket item EPA-HQ-OAR-2003-0118-0214 and -0216 at
http://www.regulations.gov.
    Environmental information: C6-perfluoroketone has no ODP. C6-
perfluoroketone has a GWP of 0.6 to 1.8 and an atmospheric lifetime of
up to 2 weeks (October 1, 2004; 69 FR 58903). C6-perfluoroketone is
currently defined as a VOC under Clean Air Act regulations (see 40 CFR
51.100(s)) addressing the development of SIPs to attain and maintain
the national ambient air quality standards.
    Flammability information: C6-perfluoroketone is non-flammable.
    Toxicity and exposure data: Potential health effects of this
substitute include central nervous system depression or irregular
heartbeat, at sufficiently high concentrations. These potential health
effects are common to many refrigerants.
    EPA anticipates that C6-perfluoroketone will be used consistent
with the recommendations specified in the manufacturer's MSDSs. The
manufacturer recommends a workplace exposure limit of 150 ppm over an
8-hour time-weighted average for C6-perfluoroketone. EPA anticipates
that users will be able to meet the manufacturer's recommended
workplace exposure limit and will be able to address potential health
risks by following requirements and recommendations in the MSDSs and
other safety precautions common in the refrigeration and air
conditioning industry.
    Comparison to other refrigerants: C6-perfluoroketone is not ozone
depleting in contrast to CFC-113, the ozone depleting substance which
it replaces. In its lack of risk for ozone depletion, C6-
perfluoroketone is comparable to other non-ozone-depleting substitutes
for CFC-113, such as HFE-7100, HFC-245fa and CO2. (CFC-113,
has an ozone depletion potential (ODP) of 1.0 relative to CFC-11 (WMO,
2006).) C6-perfluoroketone's GWP is less than 2, which is comparable to
or lower than that of other substitutes for CFC-113 in heat transfer
uses. For example, the GWP of HFE-7100 is about 297, the GWP of HFC-
245fa is about 1030, and the GWP of CO2 is 1. Additionally,
the GWP for C6-perfluoroketone is significantly lower than the GWP for
the ozone-depleting substance it will replace. (CFC-113 has a GWP of
6130 (WMO, 2006).) Flammability and toxicity risks are low, as
discussed above. Thus, we find that C6-perfluoroketone is acceptable
because it does not pose a greater overall risk to public health and
the environment than the other substitutes acceptable in the end use
listed above.
3. R-438A (ISCEON[supreg] MO99)
    DuPont Fluoroproducts has notified EPA that it is using the name
DuPontTMISCEON[supreg] MO99 in marketing the refrigerant
blend that EPA reviewed under the name ``KDD5''. On October 4, 2007 (72
FR 56628), EPA found KDD5 acceptable as a substitute for HCFC-22 for a
variety of end-uses. The composition of the formulation was originally
requested to be confidential business information (CBI); however, the
company has now removed the CBI restrictions. This blend has been given
the designation R-438A in ASHRAE Standard 34. This blend is non-
flammable and has ASHRAE safety classification A1.

B. Foam Blowing

1. Formacel[supreg] TI
    EPA's decision: Formacel[supreg] TI is acceptable as a substitute
for HCFC-22 and HCFC-142b in:
     Rigid Polyurethane Appliance Foam.
     Rigid Polyurethane Spray, Commercial Refrigeration, and
Sandwich Panels.
     Integral Skin Polyurethane.
     Polyolefin.
     Rigid Polyurethane Slabstock and Other.
     Polystyrene Extruded Boardstock & Billet.
     Polystyrene Extruded Sheet.
     Rigid Polyurethane & Polyisocyanurate Laminated
Boardstock.
    Formacel[supreg] TI is a series of blends with different percentage
contents of the same compounds. The submitter has claimed its
composition as confidential business information. You may find the
submission under Docket item EPA-HQ-OAR-2003-0118-0217 and -0219 at
http://www.regulations.gov.
    Environmental information: Formacel[supreg] TI has no ODP.
Formacel[supreg] TI blends range in global warming potential (GWP) from
approximately 1330 to 1500. Formacel[supreg] TI does not contain
volatile organic compounds (VOC) as defined under Clean Air Act
regulations (see 40 CFR 51.100(s)) addressing the development of State
Implementation Plans (SIPs) to attain and maintain the national ambient
air quality standards.
    Flammability information: Formacel[supreg] TI blends are not
flammable.
    Toxicity and exposure data: Potential health effects of this
substitute include nausea, headache, weakness, or central nervous
system depression with effects such as dizziness, drowsiness,
confusion, or loss of consciousness. The substitute may also irritate
the lungs, skin or eyes or cause frostbite. At high concentrations, the
substitute may cause irregular heartbeat or death. The substitute could
cause asphyxiation, if air is displaced by vapors in a confined space.
These potential health effects are common to many foam blowing agents.
    EPA anticipates that Formacel[supreg] TI will be used consistent
with the recommendations specified in the manufacturer's Material
Safety Data Sheets (MSDSs). The manufacturer recommends a workplace
exposure limit of 1000 ppm on an 8-hour time-weighted average for
Formacel[supreg] TI. EPA anticipates that users will be able to meet
the manufacturer's recommended workplace exposure limits and will be
able to address potential health risks by following requirements and
recommendations in the MSDSs and other safety precautions common in the
foam blowing industry.
    Comparison to other foam blowing agents: Formacel[supreg] TI is not
ozone

depleting in contrast to the ozone depleting substances which it
replaces. (HCFC-22 and HCFC-142b have ODPs of 0.05 and 0.07,
respectively (WMO, 2006).) In its lack of risk for ozone depletion,
Formacel[supreg] TI is comparable to other substitutes for HCFC-22 and
HCFC-142b, such as hydrofluorocarbon (HFC)-134a and HFC-245fa.
Formacel[supreg] TI blends range in GWP from 1330 to 1500, comparable
to or lower than that of other substitutes for HCFC-22 and HCFC-142b.
For example, the GWP of HFC-134a is about 1430 and the GWP of HFC-245fa
is about 1030. Additionally, the GWP for Formacel[supreg] TI is lower
than the GWP for the ozone-depleting substances it will replace. (The
GWPs of HCFC-22 and HCFC-142b are 1810 and 2310, respectively (WMO,
2006). Flammability and toxicity risks are low, as discussed above.
Thus, we find that Formacel[supreg] TI is acceptable because it does
not pose a greater overall risk to public health and the environment
than the other substitutes acceptable in the end use listed above.
2. HFO-1234ze
    EPA's decision: Hydrofluoroolefin 1 (HFO)-1234ze is
acceptable as a substitute for CFCs and HCFCs in:
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \1\ Hydrofluoroolefins are a subset of hydrofluorocarbons that
contain double bonds between carbon atoms.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

     Rigid Polyurethane Appliance Foam.
     Rigid Polyurethane Spray, Commercial Refrigeration, and
Sandwich Panels.
     Polystyrene Extruded Boardstock & Billet.

HFO-1234ze is also known as HFC-1234ze or trans-1,3,3,3-
tetrafluoroprop-1-ene (CAS Reg. No.29118-24-9). You may find the
submission under Docket item EPA-HQ-OAR-2003-0118-0222 at http://
www.regulations.gov.
    Environmental information: HFO-1234ze has no ODP. HFO-1234ze has a
GWP of 6 and an atmospheric lifetime of approximately 2 weeks
(``Atmospheric chemistry of trans-CF3CH=CHF: products and mechanisms of
hydroxyl radical and chlorine atom initiated oxidation,'' M.S. Javadi,
R. S[oslash]ndergaard, O.J. Nielsen, M.D. Hurley, and T.J. Wellington,
Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics Discussions 8, 1069-1088, 2008). HFO-
1234ze is currently defined as a VOC as defined under Clean Air Act
regulations (see 40 CFR 51.100(s)) addressing the development of SIPs
to attain and maintain the national ambient air quality standards.
    Flammability information: HFO-1234ze is non-flammable.
    Toxicity and exposure data: Potential health effects of this
substitute at lower concentrations include drowsiness and dizziness.
The substitute may also irritate the skin or eyes or cause frostbite.
At sufficiently high concentrations, it may cause central nervous
system depression or irregular heartbeat. The substitute could cause
asphyxiation, if air is displaced by vapors in a confined space. The
substitute may also irritate the lungs, skin or eyes or cause
frostbite. These potential health effects are common to many foam
blowing agents.
    EPA anticipates that HFO-1234ze will be used consistent with the
recommendations specified in the manufacturer's MSDSs. EPA recommends a
preliminary workplace exposure limit of 375 ppm for HFO-1234ze. EPA
anticipates that users will be able to meet this recommended workplace
exposure limit and will be able to address potential health risks by
following requirements and recommendations in the MSDSs and other
safety precautions common in the foam blowing industry. Further, EPA is
reviewing this substance as a Pre-manufacture Notice under the Toxic
Substances Control Act (TSCA). Therefore, use of HFO-1234ze must be in
accord with EPA's final decision under TSCA.
    Comparison to other foam blowing agents: HFO-1234ze is not ozone
depleting in contrast to the ozone depleting substances which it
replaces. In its lack of risk for ozone depletion, HFO-1234ze is
comparable to other substitutes for HCFC-22 and HCFC-142b, such as HFC-
134a and HFC-245fa. (HCFC-22 and HCFC-142b have ODPs of 0.05 and 0.07,
respectively (WMO, 2006).) HFO-1234ze's GWP is 6, comparable to or
lower than that of other substitutes for HCFC-22 and HCFC-142b. For
example, the GWP of HFC-134a is about 1430 and the GWP of HFC-245fa is
about 1030. Additionally, the GWP for HFO-1234ze is significantly lower
than the GWPs for the ozone-depleting substances it will replace. (The
GWPs of HCFC-22 and HCFC-142b are 1810 and 2310, respectively (WMO,
2006).) Flammability risks can be addressed by procedures common in the
industry. The toxicity risks are low, as discussed above. Thus, we find
that HFO-1234ze is acceptable because it does not pose a greater
overall risk to public health and the environment than the other
substitutes acceptable in the end uses listed above.
3. HFC-365mfc
    EPA's decision: HFC-365mfc is acceptable as a substitute for HCFC-
141b in:
     Rigid Polyurethane Appliance Foam.
     Rigid Polyurethane Commercial Refrigeration and Sandwich
Panels.
     Flexible Polyurethane.
     Integral Skin Polyurethane.
     Polystyrene Extruded Sheet.
     Polyolefin.
     Rigid Polyurethane Slabstock and Other.
     Polystyrene Extruded Boardstock & Billet.
     Rigid Polyurethane & Polyisocyanurate Laminated
Boardstock.
     Phenolic Insulation Board & Bunstock.

HFC-365mfc is also known as 1,1,1,3,3-pentafluorobutane (CAS Reg. No.
405-58-6). EPA previously found HFC-365mfc acceptable as an aerosol
solvent and as a solvent in metals, electronics, and precision cleaning
(December 18, 2000; 65 FR 78977). You may find the submission under
Docket items EPA-HQ-OAR-2003-0118-0221 and -0224 at http://
www.regulations.gov.
    Environmental information: HFC-365mfc has no ODP. HFC-365mfc has a
GWP of 794 and an atmospheric lifetime of 8.6 years (IPCC, 2007). HFC-
365mfc is not a VOC as defined under Clean Air Act regulations (see 40
CFR 51.100(s)) addressing the development of SIPs to attain and
maintain the national ambient air quality standards.
    Flammability information: HFC-365mfc is mildly flammable with a
flashpoint below -27 [deg]C and a lower flammability limit of 3.6% by
volume in air. Thus, it should be handled with proper precautions. EPA
recommends that users follow all requirements and recommendations
specified in the MSDS and other safety precautions for use of flammable
blowing agents used in the foam blowing industry. Use of HFC-365mfc
will require safe handling and shipping as prescribed by the
Occupational Safety and Health Administration (OSHA) and the Department
of Transportation (for example, using personal safety equipment and
following requirements for shipping hazardous materials at 49 CFR parts
170 through 173).
    Toxicity and exposure data: Potential health effects of this
substitute include irritation of the lungs, skin or eyes or frostbite.
At high concentrations, the substitute may also cause irregular
heartbeat, unconsciousness, or death. The substitute could cause
asphyxiation, if air is displaced by

vapors in a confined space. These potential health effects are common
to many foam blowing agents.
    EPA anticipates that HFC-365mfc will be used consistent with the
recommendations specified in the manufacturer's MSDSs. The manufacturer
recommends a workplace exposure limit of 1000 ppm on an 8-hour time-
weighted average for HFC-365mfc. EPA anticipates that users will be
able to meet the manufacturer's recommended workplace exposure limits
and will be able to address potential health risks by following
requirements and recommendations in the MSDSs and other safety
precautions common in the foam blowing industry.
    Comparison to other foam blowing agents: HFC-365mfc is not ozone
depleting in contrast to the ozone depleting substances which it
replaces. (HCFC-141b has an ODP of 0.12 (WMO, 2006).) In its lack of
risk for ozone depletion, HFC-365mfc is comparable to other non-ozone-
depleting substitutes for HCFC-141b, such as HFC-134a and HFC-245fa.
HFC-365mfc's GWP is 794, comparable to or lower than that of other
substitutes for HCFC-141b. For example, the GWP of HFC-134a is about
1430 and the GWP of HFC-245fa is about 1030. Additionally, the GWP for
HFC-365mfc is comparable to the GWP for the ozone-depleting substance
it will replace. (The GWP of HCFC-141b is 725 (WMO, 2006)).
Flammability risks can be addressed by procedures common in the
industry. The toxicity risks are low, as discussed above. Thus, we find
that HFC-365mfc is acceptable because it does not pose a greater
overall risk to public health and the environment than the other
substitutes acceptable in the end use listed above.
4. Blends of HFC-365mfc and HFC-245fa
    EPA's decision: Blends of HFC-365mfc and HFC-245fa containing at
least 5% HFC-245fa are acceptable as substitutes for HCFC-141b in:
     Rigid Polyurethane Spray, Commercial Refrigeration and
Sandwich Panels

Additional information about HFC-365mfc is in the decision above in
this section. HFC-245fa is also known as 1,1,1,3,3-pentafluoropropane
(CAS Reg. No. 460-73-1). EPA previously found HFC-245fa acceptable as a
foam blowing agent, as an aerosol solvent, and as a refrigerant (August
21, 2003, 68 FR 50533; March 22, 2002, 76 FR 13272; June 19, 2000, 65
FR 37900; March 29, 2006; 71 FR 15589). The submitter expects that
users would use blends containing at least 5 percent HFC-245fa by
weight with the remainder being HFC-365mfc, with blends typically
containing 30 to 70 percent HFC-245fa and 70 to 30 percent HFC-365mfc.
You may find the information on blends of HFC-365mfc and HFC-245fa
under Docket item EPA-HQ-OAR-2003-0118-0227 at http://
www.regulations.gov.
    Environmental information: For environmental information about HFC-
365mfc, see the decision above in this section. HFC-245fa has no ODP.
HFC-245fa has a GWP of 1030 and an atmospheric lifetime of 7.6 years
(IPCC, 2007). HFC-245fa is not a VOC as defined under Clean Air Act
regulations (see 40 CFR 51.100(s)) addressing the development of SIPs
to attain and maintain the national ambient air quality standards.
    Flammability information: HFC-365mfc is mildly flammable with a
flashpoint below -27 [deg]C, while HFC-245fa is non-flammable. Blends
of HFC-365mfc and HFC-245fa containing at least 5% HFC-245fa by weight
will not be flammable. Blends will require safe handling and shipping
as prescribed by the Occupational Safety and Health Administration
(OSHA) and the Department of Transportation (for example, using
personal safety equipment and following requirements for shipping
hazardous materials at 49 CFR parts 170 through 173).
    Toxicity and exposure data: Potential health effects of this
substitute include irritation of the lungs, skin or eyes or frostbite.
At high concentrations, the substitute may also cause irregular
heartbeat, unconsciousness, or death. The substitute could cause
asphyxiation, if air is displaced by vapors in a confined space. These
potential health effects are common to many foam blowing agents.
    EPA anticipates that blends of HFC-365mfc and HFC-245fa will be
used consistent with the recommendations specified in the
manufacturer's MSDSs. The manufacturer recommends a workplace exposure
limit of 1000 ppm on an 8-hour time-weighted average for HFC-365mfc.
The American Industrial Hygiene Association (AIHA) recommends a
workplace environmental exposure limit (WEEL) of 300 ppm on an 8-hour
time-weighted average for HFC-245fa. EPA anticipates that users will be
able to meet the manufacturer's recommended workplace exposure limits
and the AIHA WEEL and will be able to address potential health risks by
following requirements and recommendations in the MSDSs and other
safety precautions common in the foam blowing industry.
    Comparison to other foam blowing agents: Blends of HFC-365mfc and
HFC-245fa are not ozone depleting in contrast to the ozone depleting
substances which they replace. (HCFC-141b has an ODP of 0.12 (WMO,
2006).) In their lack of risk for ozone depletion, blends of HFC-365mfc
and HFC-245fa are comparable to other non-ozone-depleting substitutes
for HCFC-141b, such as HFC-134a and HFC-245fa alone. Blends of HFC-
365mfc and HFC-245fa will have average GWP ranging from 865 to 960,
comparable to or lower than that of other substitutes for HCFC-141b.
For example, the GWP of HFC-134a is about 1430 and the GWP of HFC-245fa
alone is about 1030. The GWPs for blends of HFC-365mfc and HFC-245fa
are comparable to the GWP for the ozone-depleting substance they will
replace. (The GWP of HCFC-141b is 725 (WMO, 2006)). Flammability risks
of the blend are low, as discussed above. The toxicity risks are low,
as discussed above. Thus, we find that blends of HFC-365mfc and HFC-
245fa are acceptable because they do not pose a greater overall risk to
public health and the environment than the other substitutes acceptable
in the end use listed above.

II. Section 612 Program

A. Section 612 Statutory and Regulatory Background

    Section 612 of the Clean Air Act (CAA) requires EPA to develop a
program for evaluating alternatives to ozone-depleting substances. EPA
refers to this program as the Significant New Alternatives Policy
(SNAP) program. The major provisions of section 612 are:
1. Rulemaking
    Section 612(c) requires EPA to promulgate rules making it unlawful
to replace any class I (e.g., chlorofluorocarbon, halon, carbon
tetrachloride, methyl chloroform, methyl bromide, and
hydrobromofluorocarbon) or class II (e.g., hydrochlorofluorocarbon)
substance with any substitute that the Administrator determines may
present adverse effects to human health or the environment where the
Administrator has identified an alternative that (1) reduces the
overall risk to human health and the environment, and (2) is currently
or potentially available.
2. Listing of Unacceptable/Acceptable Substitutes
    Section 612(c) requires EPA to publish a list of the substitutes
unacceptable for specific uses and to publish a corresponding list of
acceptable alternatives for specific uses. The list of acceptable
substitutes may be

found at http://www.epa.gov/ozone/snap/lists/index.html and the lists
of unacceptable substitutes, substitutes acceptable subject to use
conditions and substitutes acceptable subject to narrowed use limits
may be found at 40 CFR part 82 subpart G.
3. Petition Process
    Section 612(d) grants the right to any person to petition EPA to
add a substance to, or delete a substance from, the lists published in
accordance with section 612(c). The Agency has 90 days to grant or deny
a petition. Where the Agency grants the petition, EPA must publish the
revised lists within an additional six months.
4. 90-Day Notification
    Section 612(e) directs EPA to require any person who produces a
chemical substitute for a class I substance to notify the Agency not
less than 90 days before new or existing chemicals are introduced into
interstate commerce for significant new uses as substitutes for a class
I substance. The producer must also provide the Agency with the
producer's unpublished health and safety studies on such substitutes.
5. Outreach
    Section 612(b)(1) states that the Administrator shall seek to
maximize the use of Federal research facilities and resources to assist
users of class I and II substances in identifying and developing
alternatives to the use of such substances in key commercial
applications.
6. Clearinghouse
    Section 612(b)(4) requires the Agency to set up a public
clearinghouse of alternative chemicals, product substitutes, and
alternative manufacturing processes that are available for products and
manufacturing processes which use class I and II substances.
7. EPA's Regulations Implementing Section 612
    On March 18, 1994, EPA published the original rulemaking (59 FR
13044) which established the process for administering the SNAP program
and issued EPA's first lists identifying acceptable and unacceptable
substitutes in the major industrial use sectors. 40 CFR part 82,
subpart G. These sectors include: refrigeration and air conditioning;
foam blowing; solvents cleaning; fire suppression and explosion
protection; sterilants; aerosols; adhesives, coatings and inks; and
tobacco expansion. These sectors comprise the principal industrial
sectors that historically consumed the largest volumes of ODS.
    For the purposes of SNAP, the Agency defines a ``substitute'' as
any chemical, product substitute, or alternative manufacturing process,
whether existing or new, intended for use as a replacement for a class
I or class II substance in a sector that has historically used ODS.
Anyone who produces a substitute must provide the Agency with health
and safety studies on the substitute at least 90 days before
introducing it into interstate commerce for significant new use as an
alternative. This requirement applies to substitute manufacturers, but
may include importers, formulators, or end-users, when they are
responsible for introducing a substitute into commerce.

B. Regulatory History

    On March 18, 1994, EPA published the final rulemaking (59 FR 13044)
that described the process for administering the SNAP program and
issued our first acceptability lists for substitutes in the major
industrial use sectors. These sectors include:
     Refrigeration and air conditioning;
     Foam blowing;
     Solvents cleaning;
     Fire suppression and explosion protection;
     Sterilants;
     Aerosols;
     Adhesives, coatings and inks; and
     Tobacco expansion.

These sectors comprise the principal industrial sectors that
historically consumed the largest volumes of ozone-depleting compounds.
    As described in the original rule for the SNAP program, EPA does
not believe that rulemaking procedures are required to list
alternatives as acceptable with no limitations. Such listings do not
impose any sanction, nor do they remove any prior license to use a
substance. Therefore, by this notice we are adding substances to the
list of acceptable alternatives without first requesting comment on new
listings.
    However, we do believe that notice-and-comment rulemaking is
required to place any substance on the list of prohibited substitutes,
to list a substance as acceptable only under certain conditions, to
list substances as acceptable only for certain uses, or to remove a
substance from the lists of prohibited or acceptable substitutes. We
publish updates to these lists as separate notices of rulemaking in the
Federal Register.
    The Agency defines a ``substitute'' as any chemical, product
substitute, or alternative manufacturing process, whether existing or
new, intended for use as a replacement for a class I or class II
substance. Anyone who plans to market or produces a substitute for an
ODS in one of the eight major industrial use sectors must provide EPA
with health and safety studies on the substitute at least 90 days
before introducing it into interstate commerce for significant new use
as an alternative. This requirement applies to substitute
manufacturers, but may include importers, formulators, or end-users,
when they are responsible for introducing a substitute into commerce.
    You can find a complete chronology of SNAP decisions and the
appropriate Federal Register citations from the SNAP section of EPA's
Ozone Depletion World Wide Web site at http://www.epa.gov/ozone/snap/
chron.html. This information is also available from the Air Docket (see
ADDRESSES section above for contact information).

List of Subjects in 40 CFR Part 82

    Environmental protection, Administrative practice and procedure,
Air pollution control, Reporting and recordkeeping requirements.

    Dated: September 11, 2009.
Jackie Krieger,
Acting Director, Office of Atmospheric Programs.

    Note: The following appendix will not appear in the Code of
Federal Regulations.

                                   Appendix A--Summary of Acceptable Decisions
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
              End-use                      Substitute                Decision             Further information
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
                                       Refrigeration and Air Conditioning
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Retail food refrigeration (new)....  R-744 (CO2) as a        Acceptable.............  Observe recommendations in
                                      substitute for CFC-                              the equipment
                                      12, R-502, HCFC-22,                              manufacturers' guidance
                                      and blends containing                            manual and MSDSs and
                                      HCFC-22.                                         follow the guidelines of
                                                                                ASHRAE 15.

Cold storage warehouses (new)......  R-744 (CO2) as a        Acceptable.............  Observe recommendations in
                                      substitute for CFC-                              the equipment
                                      12, R-502, HCFC-22,                              manufacturers' guidance
                                      and blends containing                            manual and MSDSs and
                                      HCFC-22.                                         follow the guidelines of
                                                                                ASHRAE 15.
Non-mechanical heat transfer         C6-perfluoroketone as   Acceptable.............  Observe recommendations in
 (retrofit and new).                  a substitute for CFC-                            the equipment
                                      113.                                             manufacturer's guidance
                                                                                and MSDS. The
                                                                                manufacturer recommends
                                                                                an acceptable exposure
                                                                                limit of 150 ppm on an 8-
                                                                                hr time-weighted average.
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
                                                  Foam Blowing
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Rigid Polyurethane Appliance Foam..  HFO-1234ze as a         Acceptable.............  HFO-1234ze is non-
                                      substitute for CFCs                              flammable and has a 100-
                                      and HCFCs.                                       year global warming
                                                                                potential of 6. Its CAS
                                                                                Reg. No. is 29118-24-9.
                                                                                EPA recommends a
                                                                                preliminary acceptable
                                                                                exposure limit of 375 ppm
                                                                                on an 8-hr time-weighted
                                                                                average. Use of HFO-
                                                                                1234ze must be in accord
                                                                                with EPA's final decision
                                                                                under the Toxic
                                                                                Substances Control Act
                                                                                (TSCA).
                                     HFC-365mfc as a         Acceptable.............  HFC-365mfc is mildly
                                      substitute for HCFC-                             flammable and has a 100-
                                      141b.                                            year global warming
                                                                                potential of 794. Observe
                                                                                recommendations in the
                                                                                manufacturer's MSDS and
                                                                                guidance for using this
                                                                                compound, particularly to
                                                                                address its potential
                                                                                flammability. Follow safe
                                                                                handling and shipping as
                                                                                prescribed by the
                                                                                Occupational Safety and
                                                                                Health Administration
                                                                                (OSHA) and the Department
                                                                                of Transportation (DOT)
                                                                                (for example, using
                                                                                personal safety equipment
                                                                                and following
                                                                                requirements for shipping
                                                                                hazardous materials at 49
                                                                                CFR parts 170 through
                                                                                173). Its CAS Reg. No. is
                                                                                405-58-6.
                                     Formacel[supreg] TI as  Acceptable.............  Observe recommendations in
                                      a substitute for HCFC-                           the manufacturer's MSDS
                                      22 and HCFC-142b.                                and guidance for using
                                                                                these blends.
Rigid Polyurethane Commercial        HFC-365mfc as a         Acceptable.............  HFC-365mfc is mildly
 Refrigeration and Sandwich Panels.   substitute for HCFC-                             flammable and has a 100-
                                      141b.                                            year global warming
                                                                                potential of 794. Observe
                                                                                recommendations in the
                                                                                manufacturer's MSDS and
                                                                                guidance for using this
                                                                                compound, particularly to
                                                                                address its potential
                                                                                flammability. Follow safe
                                                                                handling and shipping as
                                                                                prescribed by OSHA and
                                                                                DOT (for example, using
                                                                                personal safety equipment
                                                                                and following
                                                                                requirements for shipping
                                                                                hazardous materials at 49
                                                                                CFR parts 170 through
                                                                                173).
Rigid Polyurethane Spray,            HFO-1234ze as a         Acceptable.............  HFO-1234ze is non-
 Commercial Refrigeration, and        substitute for CFCs                              flammable and has a 100-
 Sandwich Panels.                     and HCFCs.                                       year global warming
                                                                                potential of 6. Its CAS
                                                                                Reg. No. is 29118-24-9.
                                                                                EPA recommends a
                                                                                preliminary acceptable
                                                                                exposure limit of 375 ppm
                                                                                on an 8-hr time-weighted
                                                                                average. Use of HFO-
                                                                                1234ze must be in accord
                                                                                with EPA's final decision
                                                                                under TSCA.
                                     Blends of HFC-365mfc    Acceptable.............  Blends of HFC-365mfc and
                                      and HFC-245fa (at                                HFC-245fa containing at
                                      least 5% HFC-245fa by                            least 5% HFC-245fa by
                                      weight) as                                       weight are non-flammable.
                                      substitutes for HCFC-                            Typical blends contain 30
                                      141b.                                            to 70% HFC-245fa and 70
                                                                                to 30% HFC-365mfc.
                                                                                Observe recommendations
                                                                                in the manufacturer's
                                                                                MSDS and guidance for
                                                                                using these blends.
                                     Formacel[supreg] TI as  Acceptable.............  Observe recommendations in
                                      a substitute for HCFC-                           the manufacturer's MSDS
                                      22 and HCFC-142b.                                and guidance for using
                                                                                these blends.
Flexible Polyurethane..............  HFC-365mfc as a         Acceptable.............  HFC-365mfc is mildly
                                      substitute for HCFC-                             flammable and has a 100-
                                      141b.                                            year global warming
                                                                                potential of 794. Observe
                                                                                recommendations in the
                                                                                manufacturer's MSDS and
                                                                                guidance for using this
                                                                                compound, particularly to
                                                                                address its potential
                                                                                flammability. Follow safe
                                                                                handling and shipping as
                                                                                prescribed by OSHA and
                                                                                DOT (for example, using
                                                                                personal safety equipment
                                                                                and following
                                                                                requirements for shipping
                                                                                hazardous materials at 49
                                                                                CFR parts 170 through
                                                                                173). Its CAS Reg. No. is
                                                                                405-58-6.

Integral Skin Polyurethane.........  HFC-365mfc as a         Acceptable.............  HFC-365mfc is mildly
                                      substitute for HCFC-                             flammable and has a 100-
                                      141b.                                            year global warming
                                                                                potential of 794. Observe
                                                                                recommendations in the
                                                                                manufacturer's MSDS and
                                                                                guidance for using this
                                                                                compound, particularly to
                                                                                address its potential
                                                                                flammability. Follow safe
                                                                                handling and shipping as
                                                                                prescribed by OSHA and
                                                                                DOT (for example, using
                                                                                personal safety equipment
                                                                                and following
                                                                                requirements for shipping
                                                                                hazardous materials at 49
                                                                                CFR parts 170 through
                                                                                173). Its CAS Reg. No. is
                                                                                405-58-6.
                                     Formacel[supreg] TI as  Acceptable.............  Observe recommendations in
                                      a substitute for HCFC-                           the manufacturer's MSDS
                                      22 and HCFC-142b.                                and guidance for using
                                                                                these blends.
Polystyrene Extruded Sheet.........  HFC-365mfc as a         Acceptable.............  HFC-365mfc is mildly
                                      substitute for HCFC-                             flammable and has a 100-
                                      141b.                                            year global warming
                                                                                potential of 794. Observe
                                                                                recommendations in the
                                                                                manufacturer's MSDS and
                                                                                guidance for using this
                                                                                compound, particularly to
                                                                                address its potential
                                                                                flammability. Follow safe
                                                                                handling and shipping as
                                                                                prescribed by OSHA and
                                                                                DOT (for example, using
                                                                                personal safety equipment
                                                                                and following
                                                                                requirements for shipping
                                                                                hazardous materials at 49
                                                                                CFR parts 170 through
                                                                                173). Its CAS Reg. No. is
                                                                                405-58-6.
                                     Formacel[supreg] TI as  Acceptable.............  Observe recommendations in
                                      a substitute for HCFC-                           the manufacturer's MSDS
                                      22 and HCFC-142b.                                and guidance for using
                                                                                these blends.
Polyolefin.........................  HFC-365mfc as a         Acceptable.............  HFC-365mfc is mildly
                                      substitute for HCFC-                             flammable and has a 100-
                                      141b.                                            year global warming
                                                                                potential of 794. Observe
                                                                                recommendations in the
                                                                                manufacturer's MSDS and
                                                                                guidance for using this
                                                                                compound, particularly to
                                                                                address its potential
                                                                                flammability.
                                                                                Follow safe handling and
                                                                                shipping as prescribed by
                                                                                OSHA and DOT (for
                                                                                example, using personal
                                                                                safety equipment and
                                                                                following requirements
                                                                                for shipping hazardous
                                                                                materials at 49 CFR parts
                                                                                170 through 173). Its CAS
                                                                                Reg. No. is 405-58-6.
                                     Formacel[supreg] TI as  Acceptable.............  Observe recommendations in
                                      a substitute for HCFC-                           the manufacturer's MSDS
                                      22 and HCFC-142b.                                and guidance for using
                                                                                these blends.
Rigid Polyurethane Slabstock and     HFC-365mfc as a         Acceptable.............  HFC-365mfc is mildly
 Other.                               substitute for HCFC-                             flammable and has a 100-
                                      141b.                                            year global warming
                                                                                potential of 794. Observe
                                                                                recommendations in the
                                                                                manufacturer's MSDS and
                                                                                guidance for using this
                                                                                compound, particularly to
                                                                                address its potential
                                                                                flammability. Follow safe
                                                                                handling and shipping as
                                                                                prescribed by OSHA and
                                                                                DOT (for example, using
                                                                                personal safety equipment
                                                                                and following
                                                                                requirements for shipping
                                                                                hazardous materials at 49
                                                                                CFR parts 170 through
                                                                                173). Its CAS Reg. No. is
                                                                                405-58-6.
                                     Formacel[supreg] TI as  Acceptable.............  Observe recommendations in
                                      a substitute for HCFC-                           the manufacturer's MSDS
                                      22 and HCFC-142b.                                and guidance for using
                                                                                these blends.
Polystyrene, Extruded Boardstock &   HFO-1234ze as a         Acceptable.............  HFO-1234ze is non-
 Billet.                              substitute for CFCs                              flammable and has a 100-
                                      and HCFCs.                                       year global warming
                                                                                potential of 6. Its CAS
                                                                                Reg. No. is 29118-24-9.
                                                                                EPA recommends a
                                                                                preliminary acceptable
                                                                                exposure limit of 375 ppm
                                                                                on an 8-hr time-weighted
                                                                                average. Use of HFO-
                                                                                1234ze must be in accord
                                                                                with EPA's final decision
                                                                                under TSCA.
                                     HFC-365mfc as a         Acceptable.............  HFC-365mfc is mildly
                                      substitute for HCFC-                             flammable and has a 100-
                                      141b.                                            year global warming
                                                                                potential of 794. Observe
                                                                                recommendations in the
                                                                                manufacturer's MSDS and
                                                                                guidance for using this
                                                                                compound, particularly to
                                                                                address its potential
                                                                                flammability. Follow safe
                                                                                handling and shipping as
                                                                                prescribed by OSHA and
                                                                                DOT (for example, using
                                                                                personal safety equipment
                                                                                and following
                                                                                requirements for shipping
                                                                                hazardous materials at 49
                                                                                CFR parts 170 through
                                                                                173). Its CAS Reg. No. is
                                                                                405-58-6.
                                     Formacel[supreg] TI as  Acceptable.............  Observe recommendations in
                                      a substitute for HCFC-                           the manufacturer's MSDS
                                      22 and HCFC-142b.                                and guidance for using
                                                                                these blends.

Rigid Polyurethane &                 HFC-365mfc as a         Acceptable.............  HFC-365mfc is mildly
 Polyisocyanurate Laminated           substitute for HCFC-                             flammable and has a 100-
 Boardstock.                          141b.                                            year global warming
                                                                                potential of 794. Observe
                                                                                recommendations in the
                                                                                manufacturer's MSDS and
                                                                                guidance for using this
                                                                                compound, particularly to
                                                                                address its potential
                                                                                flammability. Follow safe
                                                                                handling and shipping as
                                                                                prescribed by OSHA and
                                                                                DOT (for example, using
                                                                                personal safety equipment
                                                                                and following
                                                                                requirements for shipping
                                                                                hazardous materials at 49
                                                                                CFR parts 170 through
                                                                                173). Its CAS Reg. No. is
                                                                                405-58-6.
                                     Formacel[supreg] TI as  Acceptable.............  Observe recommendations in
                                      a substitute for HCFC-                           the manufacturer's MSDS
                                      22 and HCFC-142b.                                and guidance for using
                                                                                these blends.
Phenolic Insulation Board &          HFC-365mfc as a         Acceptable.............  HFC-365mfc is mildly
 Bunstock.                            substitute for HCFC-                             flammable and has a 100-
                                      141b.                                            year global warming
                                                                                potential of 794. Observe
                                                                                recommendations in the
                                                                                manufacturer's MSDS and
                                                                                guidance for using this
                                                                                compound, particularly to
                                                                                address its potential
                                                                                flammability. Follow safe
                                                                                handling and shipping as
                                                                                prescribed by OSHA and
                                                                                DOT (for example, using
                                                                                personal safety equipment
                                                                                and following
                                                                                requirements for shipping
                                                                                hazardous materials at 49
                                                                                CFR parts 170 through
                                                                                173). Its CAS Reg. No. is
                                                                                405-58-6.
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

[FR Doc. E9-23470 Filed 9-29-09; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 6560-50-P


[Federal Register Volume 82, Number 13 (Monday, January 23, 2017)]
[Notices]
[Page 7821]
[FR Doc No: 2017-01273]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY

[EPA-HQ-OECA-2013-0301; FRL--9955-39-OEI]

Information Collection Request Submitted to OMB for Review and
Approval; Comment Request; NESHAP for Beryllium (Renewal)

AGENCY: Environmental Protection Agency (EPA).

ACTION: Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Environmental Protection Agency has submitted an
information collection request (ICR), ``NESHAP for Beryllium (40 CFR
part 61, subpart C) (Renewal)'' (EPA ICR No. 0193.12, OMB Control No.
2060-0092), to the Office of Management and Budget (OMB) for review and
approval in accordance with the Paperwork Reduction Act (44 U.S.C. 3501
et seq.). This is a proposed extension of the ICR, which is currently
approved through January 31, 2017. Public comments were previously
requested via the Federal Register (81 FR 26546) on May 3, 2016 during
a 60-day comment period. This notice allows for an additional 30 days
for public comments. A fuller description of the ICR is given below,
including its estimated burden and cost to the public. An Agency may
neither conduct nor sponsor, and a person is not required to respond
to, a collection of information unless it displays a currently valid
OMB control number.

DATES: Additional comments may be submitted on or before February 22,
2017

ADDRESSES: Submit your comments, referencing Docket ID Number EPA-HQ-
OECA-2013-0301, to: (1) EPA online using www.regulations.gov (our
preferred method), or by email to<EMAIL_ADDRESS>or by mail to:
EPA Docket Center, Environmental Protection Agency, Mail Code 28221T,
1200 Pennsylvania Ave. NW., Washington, DC 20460; and (2) OMB via email
to<EMAIL_ADDRESS>Address comments to OMB Desk Officer
for EPA.
    EPA's policy is that all comments received will be included in the
public docket without change including any personal information
provided, unless the comment includes profanity, threats, information
claimed to be Confidential Business Information (CBI), or other
information whose disclosure is restricted by statute.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Patrick Yellin, Monitoring,
Assistance, and Media Programs Division, Office of Compliance, Mail
Code 2227A, Environmental Protection Agency, 1200 Pennsylvania Ave.
NW., Washington, DC 20460; telephone number:<PHONE_NUMBER>; fax
number:<PHONE_NUMBER>; email address<EMAIL_ADDRESS>
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
    Supporting documents which explain in detail the information that
the EPA will be collecting are available in the public docket for this
ICR. The docket can be viewed online at www.regulations.gov or in
person at the EPA Docket Center, EPA West, Room 3334, 1301 Constitution
Ave. NW., Washington, DC. The telephone number for the Docket Center is
202-566-1744. For additional information about EPA's public docket,
visit: http://www.epa.gov/dockets.
    Abstract: Owners and operators of affected facilities are required
to comply with reporting and record keeping requirements for the
general provisions of 40 CFR part 61, subpart A, as well as the
specific requirements at 40 CFR part 61, subpart C. This includes
submitting initial notifications, performance tests and periodic
reports and results, and maintaining records of the occurrence and
duration of any startup, shutdown, or malfunction in the operation of
an affected facility, or any period during which the monitoring system
is inoperative. These reports are used by EPA to determine compliance
with these standards.
    Form Numbers: None.
    Respondents/affected entities: Facilities processing beryllium and
its derivatives.
    Respondent's obligation to respond: Mandatory (40 CFR part 61,
subpart C).
    Estimated number of respondents: 33 (total).
    Frequency of response: Initially, occasionally, and monthly.
    Total estimated burden: 2,670 hours (per year). Burden is defined
at 5 CFR 1320.3(b).
    Total estimated cost: $310,000 (per year), which includes $35,000
in either annualized capital/startup or operation & maintenance costs.
    Changes in the Estimates: There is an adjustment increase in the
respondent burden as currently identified in the OMB Inventory of
Approved Burdens. This increase is not due to any program changes. The
change in labor hour and cost estimates occurred because of a change in
assumption. This ICR assumes all existing sources will have to re-
familiarize with the regulatory requirements each year.

Courtney Kerwin,
Director, Regulatory Support Division.
[FR Doc. 2017-01273 Filed 1-19-17; 8:45 am]
 BILLING CODE 6560-50-P


P-20-0107 Sanitized Support Documents Index:
 P-20-0107 Sanitized Premanufacture Notice (linked)
 P-20-0107 Sanitized Determination Document (linked)
 P-20-0107 Sanitized CHEM Report (attached)
 P-20-0107 Sanitized ECO Report (attached)
 P-20-0107 Sanitized ENG Report (attached)
 P-20-0107 Sanitized EXP Report (attached)
 P-20-0107 Sanitized Fate Report (attached)
 P-20-0107 Sanitized HLTH Report_POST-FOCUS FINAL (attached)


[Federal Register: June 19, 2009 (Volume 74, Number 117)]
[Notices]
[Page 29202-29203]
[DOCID:fr19jn09-68]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission

Combined Notice of Filings 1

June 5, 2009.
    Take notice that the Commission received the following electric
corporate filings:

    Docket Numbers: EC09-84-000.
    Applicants: NaturEner USA, LLC, NaturEner Montana Wind Energy 2,
LLC, NaturEner Glacier Wind Energy 2, LLC.
    Description: Application for Authorization of Disposition of
Jurisdictional Facilities and Requests for Expedited Consideration and
Confidential Treatment of NaturEner Montana Wind Energy 2, LLC, et al.
    Filed Date: 06/04/2009.
    Accession Number: 20090604-5112.
    Comment Date: 5 p.m. Eastern Time on Thursday, June 25, 2009.

    Take notice that the Commission received the following electric
rate filings:

    Docket Numbers: ER03-983-021.
    Applicants: Fox Energy Company LLC.
    Description: Fox Energy Company LLC submits triennial market power
analysis.
    Filed Date: 06/03/2009.
    Accession Number: 20090604-0485.
    Comment Date: 5 p.m. Eastern Time on Monday, August 3, 2009.

    Docket Numbers: ER08-1442-001.
    Applicants: Flat Ridge Wind Energy, LLC.
    Description: Flat Ridge Wind Energy submits First Revised Sheet 1
et al. to its FERC Electric Tariff, Original Volume 1.
    Filed Date: 06/03/2009.
    Accession Number: 20090605-0078.
    Comment Date: 5 p.m. Eastern Time on Monday, June 18, 2009.

    Docket Numbers: ER09-870-001.
    Applicants: Ameren Energy Marketing Company.
    Description: Ameren Energy Marketing Co. submits Third Revised
Sheet No. 2 et al. to Second Revised Rate Schedule FERC No. 1.
    Filed Date: 06/02/2009.
    Accession Number: 20090604-0476.
    Comment Date: 5 p.m. Eastern Time on Tuesday, June 23, 2009.

    Docket Numbers: ER09-1028-001.
    Applicants: Covanta Hempstead Company.
    Description: Covanta Hempstead Co. submits Substitute Original
Sheet 2 to their FERC Electric Tariff, Original Volume 1.
    Filed Date: 06/03/2009.
    Accession Number: 20090604-0488.
    Comment Date: 5 p.m. Eastern Time on Wednesday, June 24, 2009.

    Docket Numbers: ER09-1199-000.
    Applicants: Commonwealth Edison Company of Indiana, Inc.
    Description: Commonwealth Edison Company of Indiana, Inc. submits
ministerial revision to Attachment H-13 of the PJM Interconnection, LLC
Open Access Transmission Tariff.
    Filed Date: 05/26/2009.
    Accession Number: 20090528-0061.
    Comment Date: 5 p.m. Eastern Time on Tuesday, June 16, 2009.

    Docket Numbers: ER09-1262-001.
    Applicants: Northeast Utilities Service Company.
    Description: Northeast Utilities Service Company submits for
acceptance Revised Sheet 1 to FERC Rate Schedule 100 to be effective 8/
1/09.
    Filed Date: 06/02/2009.
    Accession Number: 20090605-0066.
    Comment Date: 5 p.m. Eastern Time on Tuesday, June 23, 2009.

    Docket Numbers: ER09-1264-000.
    Applicants: Midwest Independent Transmission System Operator, Inc.
    Description: Midwest Independent Transmission System Operator, Inc.
submits Second Revised Sheet 2261 et al. to FERC Electric Tariff,
Fourth Revised Volume 1.
    Filed Date: 06/02/2009.
    Accession Number: 20090604-0475.
    Comment Date: 5 p.m. Eastern Time on Tuesday, June 23, 2009.

    Docket Numbers: ER09-1265-000.
    Applicants: PacifiCorp.
    Description: PacifiCorp submits Rate Schedule No 641 between
PacifiCorp and Utah Associated Municipal Power Systems.
    Filed Date: 06/02/2009.
    Accession Number: 20090604-0474.
    Comment Date: 5 p.m. Eastern Time on Tuesday, June 23, 2009.

    Docket Numbers: ER09-1267-000.
    Applicants: Niagara Mohawk Power Corporation.
    Description: Niagara Mohawk Power Corporation submits Original
Service Agreement 1445 et al. to its FERC Electric Tariff, Original
Volume 6.
    Filed Date: 06/03/2009.
    Accession Number: 20090605-0065.
    Comment Date: 5 p.m. Eastern Time on Wednesday, June 24, 2009.

    Docket Numbers: ER09-1268-000.
    Applicants: American Electric Power Service Corporation.
    Description: Operating Companies of the American Electric Power
System submits Original Service Agreement 671 et al. to its FERC
Electric Tariff, Third Revised Volume 6.
    Filed Date: 06/03/2009.
    Accession Number: 20090605-0064.
    Comment Date: 5 p.m. Eastern Time on Wednesday, June 24, 2009.

    Docket Numbers: ER09-1269-000.
    Applicants: Escondido Energy Center, LLC.
    Description: Escondido Energy Center, LLC submits Original Sheet 1
to FERC Electric Tariff, Original Volume 1 to be effective 7/15/09.
    Filed Date: 06/03/2009.
    Accession Number: 20090605-0063.
    Comment Date: 5 p.m. Eastern Time on Wednesday, June 24, 2009.

    Docket Numbers: ER09-1270-000.
    Applicants: Chula Vista Energy Center, LLC.
    Description: Chula Vista Energy Center, LLC submits Original Sheet
1 et al. to its FERC Electric Tariff, Original Volume 1 to be effective
7/15/09.
    Filed Date: 06/03/2009.
    Accession Number: 20090605-0062.
    Comment Date: 5 p.m. Eastern Time on Wednesday, June 24, 2009.

    Docket Numbers: ER09-1271-000.
    Applicants: PJM Interconnection, LLC.
    Description: PJM Interconnection, LLC submits a revised rate
schedule cover sheet to cancel PJM Rte Schedule FERC 3, which consists
of a legacy Interconnection Agreement dated 9/30/65, periodically
amended and supplemented etc.
    Filed Date: 06/04/2009.
    Accession Number: 20090605-0061.
    Comment Date: 5 p.m. Eastern Time on Thursday, June 25, 2009.

    Docket Numbers: ER09-1272-000.
    Applicants: PJM Interconnection, LLC.
    Description: PJM Interconnection, LLC submits an executed
Interconnection Service Agreement entered into among PJM, et al.
    Filed Date: 06/04/2009.
    Accession Number: 20090605-0060.

    Comment Date: 5 p.m. Eastern Time on Thursday, June 25, 2009.

    Docket Numbers: ER09-1273-000.
    Applicants: Westar Energy, Inc.
    Description: Westar Energy, Inc submits a standard form of a
Balancing Area Service Agreement as a new attachment to Westar's Open
Access Transmission Tariff and Schedule 3A to its OATT.
    Filed Date: 06/03/2009.
    Accession Number: 20090605-0059.
    Comment Date: 5 p.m. Eastern Time on Wednesday, June 24, 2009.

    Docket Numbers: ER09-1274-000; ER09-1275-000; ER09-1276-000.
    Applicants: Niagara Mohawk Power Corporation.
    Description: New York Independent System Operator submits Original
Service Agreement 1461 to FERC Electric Tariff, Original Volume 1.
    Filed Date: 06/03/2009.
    Accession Number: 20090605-0047.
    Comment Date: 5 p.m. Eastern Time on Wednesday, June 24, 2009.

    Take notice that the Commission received the following electric
securities filings:

    Docket Numbers: ES09-37-000.
    Applicants: Northwestern Corporation.
    Description: Application of NorthWestern Corporation for
Authorization Under Section 204 of the Federal Power Act.
    Filed Date: 05/29/2009.
    Accession Number: 20090529-5130.
    Comment Date: 5 p.m. Eastern Time on Friday, June 19, 2009.

    Take notice that the Commission received the following open access
transmission tariff filings:

    Docket Numbers: OA08-58-003.
    Applicants: ISO New England Inc.
    Description: Northeast Utilities Service Company submits amendments
to The ISO New England Inc Transmission, Markets and Services Tariff in
compliance with Order 890.
    Filed Date: 06/03/2009.
    Accession Number: 20090604-0486.
    Comment Date: 5 p.m. Eastern Time on Wednesday, June 24, 2009.

    Any person desiring to intervene or to protest in any of the above
proceedings must file in accordance with Rules 211 and 214 of the
Commission's Rules of Practice and Procedure (18 CFR 385.211 and
385.214) on or before 5 p.m. Eastern time on the specified comment
date. It is not necessary to separately intervene again in a subdocket
related to a compliance filing if you have previously intervened in the
same docket. Protests will be considered by the Commission in
determining the appropriate action to be taken, but will not serve to
make protestants parties to the proceeding. Anyone filing a motion to
intervene or protest must serve a copy of that document on the
Applicant. In reference to filings initiating a new proceeding,
interventions or protests submitted on or before the comment deadline
need not be served on persons other than the Applicant.
    The Commission encourages electronic submission of protests and
interventions in lieu of paper, using the FERC Online links at http://
www.ferc.gov. To facilitate electronic service, persons with Internet
access who will eFile a document and/or be listed as a contact for an
intervenor must create and validate an eRegistration account using the
eRegistration link. Select the eFiling link to log on and submit the
intervention or protests.
    Persons unable to file electronically should submit an original and
14 copies of the intervention or protest to the Federal Energy
Regulatory Commission, 888 First St., NE., Washington, DC 20426.
    The filings in the above proceedings are accessible in the
Commission's eLibrary system by clicking on the appropriate link in the
above list. They are also available for review in the Commission's
Public Reference Room in Washington, DC. There is an eSubscription link
on the Web site that enables subscribers to receive e-mail notification
when a document is added to a subscribed dockets(s). For assistance
with any FERC Online service, please e-mail<EMAIL_ADDRESS>
or call<PHONE_NUMBER> (toll free). For TTY, call<PHONE_NUMBER>.

Nathaniel J. Davis, Sr.,
Deputy Secretary.
[FR Doc. E9-14466 Filed 6-18-09; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 6717-01-P