[Federal Register Volume 82, Number 32 (Friday, February 17, 2017)]
[Proposed Rules]
[Pages 10973-10976]
[FR Doc No: 2017-02771]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION

Federal Aviation Administration

14 CFR Part 39

[Docket No. FAA-2017-0053; Directorate Identifier 2016-CE-037-AD]
RIN 2120-AA64

Airworthiness Directives; British Aerospace Regional Aircraft
Airplanes

AGENCY: Federal Aviation Administration (FAA), Department of
Transportation (DOT).

ACTION: Notice of proposed rulemaking (NPRM).

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: We propose to adopt a new airworthiness directive (AD) for
British Aerospace Regional Aircraft Model HP 137 Jetstream MK1,
Jetstream Series 200, and Jetstream Series 3101 airplanes that would
supersede AD 2014-07-07. This proposed AD results from mandatory
continuing airworthiness information (MCAI) originated by an aviation
authority of another country to identify and correct an unsafe
condition on an aviation product. The MCAI describes the unsafe
condition as cracking of the forward main landing gear yoke pintle
resulting from corrosion pits leading to stress corrosion cracking. We
are issuing this proposed AD to require actions to address the unsafe
condition on these products.

DATES: We must receive comments on this proposed AD by April 3, 2017.

ADDRESSES: You may send comments by any of the following methods:
     Federal eRulemaking Portal: Go to http://www.regulations.gov. Follow the instructions for submitting comments.
     Fax:<PHONE_NUMBER>.
     Mail: U.S. Department of Transportation, Docket
Operations, M-30, West Building Ground Floor, Room W12-140, 1200 New
Jersey Avenue SE., Washington, DC 20590.
     Hand Delivery: U.S. Department of Transportation, Docket
Operations, M-30, West Building Ground Floor, Room W12-140, 1200 New
Jersey Avenue SE., Washington, DC 20590, between 9 a.m. and 5 p.m.,
Monday through Friday, except Federal holidays.
    For service information identified in this proposed AD, contact BAE
Systems (Operations) Ltd, Customer Information Department, Prestwick
International Airport, Ayrshire, KA9 2RW, Scotland, United Kingdom;
phone: +44 1292 675207, fax: +44 1292 675704; email:
<EMAIL_ADDRESS>Internet: http://www.jetstreamcentral.com. You may view this referenced service
information at the FAA, Small Airplane Directorate, 901 Locust, Kansas
City, Missouri 64106. For information on the availability of this
material at the FAA, call<PHONE_NUMBER>.

Examining the AD Docket

    You may examine the AD docket on the Internet at http://www.regulations.gov by searching for and locating Docket No. FAA-2017-
0053; or in person at the Docket Management Facility between 9 a.m. and
5 p.m., Monday through Friday, except Federal holidays. The AD docket
contains this proposed AD, the regulatory evaluation, any comments
received, and other information. The street address for the Docket
Office (telephone<PHONE_NUMBER>) is in the ADDRESSES section. Comments
will be available in the AD docket shortly after receipt.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Doug Rudolph, Aerospace Engineer, FAA,
Small Airplane Directorate, 901 Locust, Room 301, Kansas City, Missouri
64106; telephone:<PHONE_NUMBER>; fax:<PHONE_NUMBER>; email:
<EMAIL_ADDRESS>
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

Comments Invited

    We invite you to send any written relevant data, views, or
arguments about this proposed AD. Send your comments to an address
listed under the ADDRESSES section. Include ``Docket No. FAA-2017-0053;
Directorate Identifier 2016-CE-037-AD'' at the beginning of your
comments. We specifically invite

comments on the overall regulatory, economic, environmental, and energy
aspects of this proposed AD. We will consider all comments received by
the closing date and may amend this proposed AD because of those
comments.
    We will post all comments we receive, without change, to http://regulations.gov, including any personal information you provide. We
will also post a report summarizing each substantive verbal contact we
receive about this proposed AD.

Discussion

    On April 4, 2014, we issued AD 2014-07-07, Amendment 39-17821 (79
FR 23897; April 29, 2014) (``2014-07-07''). That AD required actions
intended to address an unsafe condition on British Aerospace Regional
Aircraft Model HP 137 Jetstream MK1, Jetstream Series 200, and
Jetstream Series 3101 airplanes and was based on mandatory continuing
airworthiness information (MCAI) originated by an aviation authority of
another country.
    Since we issued AD 2014-07-07, additional stress corrosion cracking
in the pintle housing has been found that may not be detected during
the current inspection procedures.
    The European Aviation Safety Agency (EASA), which is the Technical
Agent for the Member States of the European Community, has issued EASA
AD No.: 2016-0224, dated November 9, 2016 (referred to after this as
``the MCAI''), to correct an unsafe condition for the specified
products. The MCAI states:

    Prompted by occurrences of the main landing gear (MLG) yoke
pintle housing cracking, the Civil Aviation Authority (CAA) UK
issued AD 003-01-86 to require repetitive inspections to detect
cracks in the yoke pintle housing on MLG fitted to Jetstream 3100
aeroplanes in accordance with BAE Systems (Operations) Ltd Service
Bulletin (SB) 32-A-JA851226, and, depending on findings, corrective
action. After that AD was issued, an occurrence was reported of
Jetstream 3100 MLG failure after landing. The subsequent
investigation revealed stress corrosion cracking of the MLG yoke
pintle housing to have caused this MLG failure. Furthermore, the
investigation report recommended a review of the effectiveness of
CAA UK AD 003-01-86 in finding cracks in the yoke pintle housing on
MLG fitted to Jetstream 3100 aeroplanes.
    Degradation of the surface protection by abrasion can occur when
the forward face of the yoke pintle rotates against the pintle
bearing, which introduces corrosion pits and, consequently, stress
corrosion cracking. This condition, if not detected and corrected,
could lead to structural failure of the MLG, possibly resulting in
loss of control of the aeroplane during take-off or landing runs.
    To provide protection of the affected area of the MLG assembly
spigot housing, BAE Systems (Operations) Ltd issued SB 32-JM7862 to
provide instructions for installation of a protective washer, fitted
at the forward spigot on both left hand and right hand MLG.
Consequently, BAE Systems (Operations) Ltd issued SB 32-A-JA851226
Revision 05 to provide additional accomplishment instructions for a
Non-destructive testing (NDT) inspection of MLG equipped with the
protective washer installed in accordance with BAE Systems
(Operations) Ltd SB 32-JM7862.
    Consequently, EASA issued AD 2013-0208, retaining the
requirements of CAA UK AD 003-01-86, which was superseded, and
required implementation of revised inspection requirements, and,
depending on findings, accomplishment of applicable corrective
action(s). That AD also introduced an optional modification, which
constituted terminating action for the inspections required by that
AD.
    Since that AD was issued, BAE Systems (Operations) Ltd has
determined that the existing inspection procedure may not be
effective in identifying stress corrosion cracking in the pintle
housing. Consequently BAE Systems (Operations) Ltd has published an
improved inspection procedure in SB 32-A-JA851226 Revision 07. This
improved inspection procedure has the ability to detect smaller
corrosion pits and cracks that are proximate in size to those that
will initiate stress corrosion.
    For the reasons described above, this AD retains the
requirements of EASA AD 2013-0208, which is superseded, and requires
MLG inspections in accordance with the improved procedure.

You may examine the MCAI on the Internet at http://www.regulations.gov
by searching for and locating Docket No. FAA-2017-0053.

Related Service Information Under 1 CFR Part 51

    British Aerospace Regional Aircraft has issued British Aerospace
Jetstream Series 3100 & 3200 Service Bulletin 32-A-JA851226, Revision
7, dated May 25, 2015. The service information describes procedures for
nondestructive testing (NDT) and visual inspections of the main landing
gear spigot housing for cracks and repair if necessary. This service
information is reasonably available because the interested parties have
access to it through their normal course of business or by the means
identified in the ADDRESSES section of this NPRM.

FAA's Determination and Requirements of the Proposed AD

    This product has been approved by the aviation authority of another
country, and is approved for operation in the United States. Pursuant
to our bilateral agreement with this State of Design Authority, they
have notified us of the unsafe condition described in the MCAI and
service information referenced above. We are proposing this AD because
we evaluated all information and determined the unsafe condition exists
and is likely to exist or develop on other products of the same type
design.

Costs of Compliance

    We estimate that this proposed AD will affect 26 products of U.S.
registry. We also estimate that it would take about 14 work-hours per
product to comply with the basic requirements of this proposed AD. The
average labor rate is $85 per work-hour.
    Based on these figures, we estimate the cost of the proposed AD on
U.S. operators to be $30,940, or $1,190 per product.
    In addition, we estimate that any necessary follow-on actions would
take about 2 work-hours and require parts costing $5,000, for a cost of
$5,170 per product. We have no way of determining the number of
products that may need these actions.

Authority for This Rulemaking

    Title 49 of the United States Code specifies the FAA's authority to
issue rules on aviation safety. Subtitle I, section 106, describes the
authority of the FAA Administrator. ``Subtitle VII: Aviation
Programs,'' describes in more detail the scope of the Agency's
authority.
    We are issuing this rulemaking under the authority described in
``Subtitle VII, Part A, Subpart III, Section 44701: General
requirements.'' Under that section, Congress charges the FAA with
promoting safe flight of civil aircraft in air commerce by prescribing
regulations for practices, methods, and procedures the Administrator
finds necessary for safety in air commerce. This regulation is within
the scope of that authority because it addresses an unsafe condition
that is likely to exist or develop on products identified in this
rulemaking action.

Regulatory Findings

    We determined that this proposed AD would not have federalism
implications under Executive Order 13132. This proposed AD would not
have a substantial direct effect on the States, on the relationship
between the national Government and the States, or on the distribution
of power and responsibilities among the various levels of government.
    For the reasons discussed above, I certify this proposed
regulation:
    (1) Is not a ``significant regulatory action'' under Executive
Order 12866,
    (2) Is not a ``significant rule'' under the DOT Regulatory Policies
and

Procedures (44 FR 11034, February 26, 1979),
    (3) Will not affect intrastate aviation in Alaska, and
    (4) Will not have a significant economic impact, positive or
negative, on a substantial number of small entities under the criteria
of the Regulatory Flexibility Act.

List of Subjects in 14 CFR Part 39

    Air transportation, Aircraft, Aviation safety, Incorporation by
reference, Safety.

The Proposed Amendment

    Accordingly, under the authority delegated to me by the
Administrator, the FAA proposes to amend 14 CFR part 39 as follows:

PART 39--AIRWORTHINESS DIRECTIVES

0
1. The authority citation for part 39 continues to read as follows:

    Authority:  49 U.S.C. 106(g), 40113, 44701.

Sec.  39.13   [Amended]

0
2. The FAA amends Sec.  39.13 by removing Amendment 39-17821 (82 FR
23897; April 29, 2014), and adding the following new AD:

British Aerospace Regional Aircraft: Docket No. FAA-2017-0053;
Directorate Identifier 2016-CE-037-AD.

(a) Comments Due Date

    We must receive comments by April 3, 2017.

(b) Affected ADs

    This AD replaces AD 2014-07-07, Amendment 39-17821 (79 FR 23897;
April 29, 2014) (``2014-07-07'').

(c) Applicability

    This AD applies to British Aerospace (Operations) Limited Model
HP.137 Jetstream Mk.1, Jetstream Series 200, and Jetstream Series
3101 airplanes, all serial numbers, certificated in any category.

(d) Subject

    Air Transport Association of America (ATA) Code 32: Landing
Gear.

(e) Reason

    This AD was prompted by mandatory continuing airworthiness
information (MCAI) issued by an aviation authority of another
country to identify and correct an unsafe condition on an aviation
product. The MCAI describes the unsafe condition as cracking of the
forward main landing gear yoke pintle resulting from corrosion pits
which can cause stress corrosion cracking resulting in loss of
control during take-off or landing. We are issuing this AD to revise
the inspection procedure to detect smaller corrosion pits and cracks
that could initiate stress corrosion cracking.

(f) Actions and Compliance

    Unless already done, do the following actions specified in
paragraphs (f)(1) through (11) of this AD:
    (1) For all airplanes: Before or at the next inspection that
would have been required by AD 2014-07-07 or within the next 30 days
after the effective date of this AD, whichever occurs later, and
repetitively thereafter at intervals not to exceed 12 months or
1,200 main landing gear (MLG) flight cycles (FC), whichever occurs
first, do a nondestructive testing (NDT) inspection of each MLG
assembly cylinder attachment spigot housing following the
Accomplishment Instructions in paragraph 2.B. Part A of British
Aerospace Jetstream Series 3100 & 3200 Service Bulletin 32-A-
JA851226, Revision 7, dated May 25, 2015.
    (2) For all airplanes: Within 300 landings after a heavy or
abnormal landing or 3 months after a heavy or abnormal landing,
whichever occurs first, do a NDT inspection of each MLG assembly
cylinder attachment spigot housing following the accomplishment
instructions in paragraph 2.B. Part A of British Aerospace Jetstream
Series 3100 & 3200 Service Bulletin 32-A-JA851226, Revision 7, dated
May 25, 2015.
    (3) For all airplanes: Within 3 months after accomplishment of
the the latest NDT inspection required by paragraph (f)(1) of this
AD or 300 MLG FC after accomplishment of the latest NDT inspection
required by paragraph (f)(1) of this AD, whichever occurs first, and
repetitively thereafter at intervals not to exceed 3 months or 300
MLG FC, whichever occurs first, do a visual inspection of each MLG
following the accomplishment instructions in paragraph 2.B. Part B
of British Aerospace Jetstream Series 3100 & 3200 Service Bulletin
32-A-JA851226, Revision 7, dated May 25, 2015. These inspections
start over after every repetitive NDT inspection required by
paragraph (f)(1)of this AD.
    (4) For all airplanes with a MLG incorporating a microswitch
hole: Within the next 10,600 MLG FC since new and repetitively
thereafter at intervals not to exceed 1,200 MLG flight cycles, do a
NDT inspection of each MLG microswitch hole following the
accomplishment instructions in paragraph 2.B. Part C of British
Aerospace Jetstream Series 3100 & 3200 Service Bulletin 32-A-
JA851226, Revision 7, dated May 25, 2015.
    (5) For all airplanes: If any discrepancy is found during any
NDT inspection required in paragraphs (f)(1), (2), or (4) of this
AD, before further flight, take all necessary corrective actions
following the instructions in British Aerospace Jetstream Series
3100 & 3200 Service Bulletin 32-A-JA851226, Revision 7, dated May
25, 2015.
    (6) For all airplanes: If any discrepancy is found during any
visual inspection required in paragraph (f)(3) of this AD, before
further flight, take all necessary corrective actions following the
instructions in British Aerospace Jetstream Series 3100 & 3200
Service Bulletin 32-A-JA851226, Revision 7, dated May 25, 2015.
    (7) For all airplanes: Doing all necessary corrective actions
required in paragraphs (f)(5) or (6) of this AD does not constitute
terminating action for the inspections required by this AD.
    (8) For all airplanes: Modification of each MLG cylinder
following BAE Systems (Operations) Ltd. Service Bulletin 32-JA880340
original issue, dated January 6, 1989, constitutes terminating
action for the inspections required by this AD for that MLG.
    (9) For all airplanes: The compliance times in paragraphs
(f)(1), (2), (3), and (4) of this AD are presented in flight cycles
(landings). If the total flight cycles have not been kept, multiply
the total number of airplane hours time-in-service (TIS) by 0.75 to
calculate the cycles. For the purposes of this AD:
    (i) 100 hours TIS x .75 = 75 cycles; and
    (ii) 1,000 hours TIS x .75 = 750 cycles.

(g) Credit for Actions Done in Accordance With Previous Service
Information

    (1) This AD allows credit for the initial inspection required in
paragraph (f)(1) of this AD if done before June 3, 2014 (the
effective date retained from AD 2014-07-07) following British
Aerospace Jetstream Series 3100 & 3200 Service Bulletin 32-A-
JA851226, Revision 5, dated April 30, 2013.
    (2) This AD allows credit for the initial inspection required in
paragraph (f)(4) of this AD if done before June 3, 2014 (the
effective date retained from AD 2014-07-07) following APPH Ltd.
Service Bulletin 32-40, at Initial Issue dated June 21, 1989.

(h) Other FAA AD Provisions

    The following provisions also apply to this AD:
    (1) Alternative Methods of Compliance (AMOCs): The Manager,
Standards Office, FAA, has the authority to approve AMOCs for this
AD, if requested using the procedures found in 14 CFR 39.19. Send
information to ATTN: Doug Rudolph, Aerospace Engineer, FAA, Small
Airplane Directorate, 901 Locust, Room 301, Kansas City, Missouri
64106; telephone:<PHONE_NUMBER>; fax:<PHONE_NUMBER>; email:
<EMAIL_ADDRESS>Before using any approved AMOC on any airplane
to which the AMOC applies, notify your appropriate principal
inspector (PI) in the FAA Flight Standards District Office (FSDO),
or lacking a PI, your local FSDO.
    (2) Airworthy Product: For any requirement in this AD to obtain
corrective actions from a manufacturer or other source, use these
actions if they are FAA-approved. Corrective actions are considered
FAA-approved if they are approved by the State of Design Authority
(or their delegated agent). You are required to assure the product
is airworthy before it is returned to service.
    (3) Reporting Requirements: For any reporting requirement in
this AD, a federal agency may not conduct or sponsor, and a person
is not required to respond to, nor shall a person be subject to a
penalty for failure to comply with a collection of information
subject to the requirements of the Paperwork Reduction Act unless
that collection of information displays a current valid OMB Control
Number. The OMB Control Number for this information collection is
2120-0056. Public reporting for this collection of information is
estimated to be approximately 5 minutes per response,

including the time for reviewing instructions, completing and
reviewing the collection of information. All responses to this
collection of information are mandatory. Comments concerning the
accuracy of this burden and suggestions for reducing the burden
should be directed to the FAA at: 800 Independence Ave. SW.,
Washington, DC 20591, Attn: Information Collection Clearance
Officer, AES-200.

(i) Related Information

    Refer to MCAI European Aviation Safety Agency (EASA) AD No.:
2016-0224, dated November 9, 2016 for related information. You may
examine the MCAI on the Internet at http://www.regulations.gov by
searching for and locating Docket No. FAA-2017-0053. For service
information related to this AD, contact BAE Systems (Operations)
Ltd, Customer Information Department, Prestwick International
Airport, Ayrshire, KA9 2RW, Scotland, United Kingdom; phone: +44
1292 675207, fax: +44 1292 675704; email:
<EMAIL_ADDRESS>Internet: http://www.jetstreamcentral.com. You may review copies of the referenced
service information at the FAA, Small Airplane Directorate, 901
Locust, Kansas City, Missouri 64106. For information on the
availability of this material at the FAA, call<PHONE_NUMBER>.

    Issued in Kansas City, Missouri, on January 19, 2017.
Melvin Johnson,
Acting Manager, Small Airplane Directorate, Aircraft Certification
Service.
[FR Doc. 2017-02771 Filed 2-16-17; 8:45 am]
 BILLING CODE 4910-13-P


[Federal Register Volume 82, Number 103 (Wednesday, May 31, 2017)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Page 24843]
[FR Doc No: 2017-11070]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION

Federal Aviation Administration

14 CFR Part 29

[Docket No. FAA-2016-6940; Notice No. 29-039-SC]

Special Conditions: Bell Helicopter Textron, Inc. (BHTI), Model
525 Helicopters; Crew Alerting System (CAS)

AGENCY: Federal Aviation Administration, DOT.

ACTION: Final special conditions; correction.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The FAA is correcting the special condition published on
November 9, 2016 which became effective on December 9, 2016 for the
BHTI Model 525 helicopter. This helicopter has a novel or unusual
design feature associated with the electronic CAS. The applicable
airworthiness regulations do not contain adequate or appropriate safety
standards for this design feature. The special conditions contain the
additional safety standards that the Administrator considers necessary
to establish a level of safety equivalent to that established by the
existing airworthiness standards.

DATES: Effective Date: May 31, 2017.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: George Harrum, Aviation Safety
Engineer, Regulations and Policy Group, Rotorcraft Directorate, FAA,
10101 Hillwood Pkwy, Fort Worth, TX 76177; telephone<PHONE_NUMBER>;
email<EMAIL_ADDRESS>
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

Background

    On November 9, 2016, the FAA published a final special condition
entitled ``Special Condition: Bell Helicopter Textron, Inc. (BHTI),
Model 525 Helicopters; Crew Alerting System (CAS).'' 81 FR 78707. In
that final special condition, the FAA inadvertently used the incorrect
format for the notice number in the header information of the special
condition as 29-039-SW-SC. The correct notice number is 29-039-SC.

Correction

    In the final special condition, FR Doc. 2019-27088, published on
November 9, 2016 at 81 FR 78707 make the following correction:
    1. On page 78707, in column one, in the heading of the final
special condition, revise ``Notice No. 29-039-SW-SC'' to read as
``Notice No. 29-039-SC''.

    Issued in Fort Worth, Texas, on May 19, 2017.
Lance Gant,
Manager, Rotorcraft Directorate, Aircraft Certification Service.
[FR Doc. 2017-11070 Filed 5-30-17; 8:45 am]
 BILLING CODE 4910-13-P


From:
Jones, DonnaLee<EMAIL_ADDRESS>Sent:
Monday, April 4, 2016 5:01 PM
To:
<EMAIL_ADDRESS><EMAIL_ADDRESS>Cc:
David Ailor<EMAIL_ADDRESS><EMAIL_ADDRESS>Raymond, Gabrielle<EMAIL_ADDRESS>Subject:
Your coke ICR letter and attachments - AK Steel

Hello  -  Attached you will find a pdf of your signed cover letter for the Coke ICR. Also attached are Enclosures 1&2 as pdf files. Enclosures #3 through #8 are attached in a combined pdf file; these are standard enclosures we include with all ICRs. Please visit the Coke ICR website at: https://icr2010.rti.org/  for the latest versions of the data tables (Excel files) to use for your answers to Enclosures 1 and 2 as well as Word versions of both Enclosures 1&2. Your packages which include hard copies of all of the attached enclosures as well as a disc with Word versions of Enclosures 1&2 and the Excel data tables. Feel free to use this disc for your first submission, but you can also send a USB/flash drive with the files, or alternatively upload the files to a password protected area of the ICR website. Note that discs and flash drives will not be returned until the end of the ICR process.
_____________________________________________________________
Regards,
Donna Lee Jones, Ph.D.
Senior Technical Advisor, Metals Sector
U. S. Environmental Protection Agency
Office of Air Quality Planning and Standards
Sector Policies and Programs Division / Metals & Inorganic Chemicals Group (D 243-02)
Research Triangle Park, NC  27711  Tele:<PHONE_NUMBER>  Fax<PHONE_NUMBER>
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
"Reasonableness never fails to be appreciated."  - anon.

<< Coke114_cover_letter_04-04-16_AKSMiddletown_signed.PDF >>
<< Coke ICR-Enclosure 1-04-01-16P.pdf >>
<< 2016-04.04-1701_EmailATT_Coke ICR-Enclosure 2-04-04B-16.pdf >>
<< Enclosure 3 - 8-2016-RTI.pdf >>


[Federal Register Volume 77, Number 183 (Thursday, September 20, 2012)]
[Notices]
[Pages 58376-58377]
[FR Doc No: 2012-23222]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission

Notice of Commission Staff Attendance

    The Federal Energy Regulatory Commission hereby gives notice that
members of the Commission's staff may attend the following meetings
related to the transmission planning activities of the Midwest
Independent Transmission System Operator, Inc. (MISO):
    Order 1000 Right of First Refusal Task Team--September 17, 2012
    Planning Advisory Committee--September 19, 2012
    Order 1000 Right of First Refusal Task Team--September 24, 2012
    The above-referenced meeting will be held at: MISO Headquarters,
720 City Center Drive, Carmel, IN 46032.
    The above-referenced meeting is open to the public.
    Further information may be found at www.misoenergy.org.
    The discussions at the meeting described above may address matters
at issue in the following proceedings:

Docket No. ER10-1791, Midwest Independent Transmission System Operator,
Inc.
Docket No. ER11-1844, Midwest Independent Transmission System Operator,
Inc.
Docket No. ER11-2700, Midwest Independent Transmission System Operator,
Inc.
Docket No. ER11-4081, Midwest Independent Transmission System Operator,
Inc.
Docket No. ER11-4514, Midwest Independent Transmission System Operator,
Inc.
Docket No. ER11-2777, Midwest Independent Transmission System Operator,
Inc. and Ameren Illinois Company
Docket No. ER12-427, Midwest Independent Transmission System Operator,
Inc.
Docket No. ER12-480, Midwest Independent Transmission System Operator,
Inc.
Docket No. ER12-715, Midwest Independent Transmission System Operator,
Inc.
Docket No. ER12-1265, Midwest Independent Transmission System Operator,
Inc.
Docket No. ER12-1266, Midwest Independent Transmission System Operator,
Inc.
Docket No. ER12-1586, Southwest Power Pool, Inc.
Docket No. ER12-1835, Midwest Independent Transmission System Operator,
Inc.
Docket No. ER12-1928, Midwest Independent Transmission System Operator,
Inc.
Docket No. ER12-2216, Midwest Independent Transmission System Operator,
Inc. and Ameren Services Company
Docket No. ER12-2257, Midwest Independent Transmission System Operator,
Inc.
Docket No. ER12-2302, Midwest Independent Transmission System Operator,
Inc.
Docket No. ER12-2380, Midwest Independent Transmission System Operator,
Inc.
Docket No. ER12-2390, Midwest Independent Transmission System Operator,
Inc.
Docket No. EL11-30, E.ON Climate & Renewables North America, LLC v.
Midwest Independent Transmission System Operator, Inc.
Docket No. EL11-34, Midwest Independent Transmission System Operator,
Inc.
Docket No. EL11-53, Shetek Wind Inc., Jeffers South LLC and Allco
Renewable Energy Limited v. Midwest Independent Transmission System
Operator, Inc.
Docket No. EL11-56, FirstEnergy Service Company v. Midwest Independent
Transmission System Operator, Inc.
Docket No. EL12-24, Pioneer Transmission LLC v. Midwest Independent
Transmission System Operator, Inc.
Docket No. EL12-28, Xcel Energy Services Inc. v. American Transmission
Company, LLC
Docket No. EL12-35, Midwest Independent Transmission System Operator,
Inc.
Docket No. OA08-53, Midwest Independent Transmission System Operator,
Inc.
    For more information, contact Jason Strong, Office of Energy
Markets Regulation, Federal Energy Regulatory Commission at (202) 502-
6124 or<EMAIL_ADDRESS>

    Dated: September 14, 2012.
Kimberly D. Bose,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2012-23222 Filed 9-19-12; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6717-01-P


[Federal Register Volume 84, Number 134 (Friday, July 12, 2019)]
[Notices]
[Page 33273]
[FR Doc No: 2019-14848]

=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY

Coast Guard

[Docket No. USCG-2019-0420]

Certificate of Alternative Compliance for the Cable Ferry TINA
FALLON

AGENCY: Coast Guard, DHS.

ACTION: Notification of issuance of a certificate of alternative
compliance.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Coast Guard announces that the Fifth District, Chief of
Prevention Division has issued a certificate of alternative compliance
from the International Regulations for Preventing Collisions at Sea,
1972 (72 COLREGS), for the cable ferry, TINA FALLON, Official Number
(O.N.) 1206170, Chesapeake Shipbuilding Corporation Hull Number 89. We
are issuing this notice because its publication is required by statute.
Due to its construction, purpose and operation, the cable ferry, TINA
FALLON cannot fully comply with the light, shape, or sound signal
provisions of the 72 COLREGS without interfering with the vessel's
design, operation and construction. This notification of issuance of a
certificate of alternative compliance promotes the Coast Guard's marine
safety mission.

DATES: The Certificate of Alternative Compliance was issued on July 2,
2019.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: For information or questions about
this notice call or email LCDR Ronaydee M. Marquez, District Five,
Asst. Chief, Inspections and Investigations, U.S. Coast Guard;
telephone:<PHONE_NUMBER>, email<EMAIL_ADDRESS>
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The United States is signatory to the
International Maritime Organization's International Regulations for
Preventing Collisions at Sea, 1972 (72 COLREGS), as amended. The
special construction or purpose of some vessels makes them unable to
comply with the light, shape, or sound signal provisions of the 72
COLREGS. Under statutory law, however, specified 72 COLREGS provisions
are not applicable to a vessel of special construction or purpose if
the Coast Guard determines that the vessel cannot comply fully with
those requirements without interfering with the special function of the
vessel.\1\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \1\ 33 U.S.C. 1605.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    The owner, builder, operator, or agent of a special construction or
purpose vessel may apply to the Coast Guard District Office in which
the vessel is being built or operated for a determination that
compliance with alternative requirements is justified,\2\ and the Chief
of the Prevention Division would then issue the applicant a certificate
of alternative compliance (COAC) if he or she determines that the
vessel cannot comply fully with 72 COLREGS light, shape, and sound
signal provisions without interference with the vessel's special
function.\3\ If the Coast Guard issues a COAC, it must publish notice
of this action in the Federal Register.\4\ Because TINA FALLON operates
within Coast Guard Fifth District, this office is authorized to issue
the COAC.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \2\ 33 CFR 81.5.
    \3\ 33 CFR 81.9.
    \4\ 33 U.S.C. 1605(c) and 33 CFR 81.18.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    The Fifth District, Chief of Prevention Division, U.S. Coast Guard,
certifies that the TINA FALLON, O.N. 1206170 is a vessel of special
construction or purpose, and that, with respect to the requirement for
sidelights and sternlights it is not possible to comply fully with the
requirements enumerated in the 72 COLREGS, without interfering with the
normal operations or design of the vessel. Installing navigation or
running lights along the centerline would interfere with the open deck
as the vessel has a pilot house superstructure set to one side of the
vessel for loading and parking vehicles. Additionally, the installation
of sidelights and sternlights on this vessel will be inconsequential as
the vessel operates on a direct cable crossing on the Nanticoke River,
Connecting Road 577 in Delaware on an unscheduled 600-foot route. While
the vessel is underway, the cable is raised, and yellow flashing
warning lights on the primary slip automatically actuate whenever the
cable is raised, thereby warning up and down river traffic when the
vessel is crossing. Due to the design and nature of the operation, it
is impossible for any vessel traffic to cross the route due to the
cable, therefore, the requirement for sidelights or sternlights have
been omitted. Installation of these lights is inconsequential and would
not pose a safety risk as no vessel traffic can cross or overtake.
Additionally, due to the short nature of the trip, the requirement for
sidelights and sternlights would interfere with the vessel's
operations, and create a burden on the operator to continuously switch
the navigation lights on and off after each 5 minute transit.
    The vessel will install the mast lights and restricted in ability
to maneuver lights (RAM) on the superstructure mast at proper height.
The Fifth District, Chief of Prevention Division further finds and
certifies that the mast light and RAM lights are in the closes possible
compliance with the applicable provisions of the 72 COLREGS.\5\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \5\ 33 U.S.C. 1605(a); 33 CFR 81.9.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    This notice is issued under authority of 33 U.S.C. 1605(c) and 33
CFR 81.18.

    Dated: July 9, 2019.
J.A. Stockwell,
Acting Chief, CDR, U.S. Coast Guard, Prevention Division, Fifth Coast
Guard District.
[FR Doc. 2019-14848 Filed 7-11-19; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 9110-04-P


U. S. Environmental Protection Agency National Pollution Prevention and Toxics Advisory Committee ( NPPTAC)

November 4 5, 2003 Key Bridge Marriott Potomac Ballroom 1401 Lee Highway Arlington, VA PUBLIC MEETING DRAFT AGENDA Tuesday, November 4, 2003 12: 30 p. m. Public Attendance Registration Begins 1: 30 p. m. Welcome and Opening Remarks ! Susan Hazen, Deputy Assistant Administrator, Office of Prevention, Pesticides and Toxic Substances ! Charles Auer, Office Director, Office of Pollution Prevention and Toxics ( OPPT) ! Harry Gregori, Jr., NPPTAC Co Chair, Virginia Department of Environmental Quality 1: 50 p. m. Committee Introductions and Agenda Review ! Barbara Stinson, Senior Partner, Meridian Institute 2: 15 p. m. Presentation  Overview of the Office of Pollution Prevention and Toxics' Program Issues ! Charles Auer, Office Director, Office of Pollution Prevention and Toxics ( OPPT) ! Margaret Schneider, Deputy Office Director, Office of Pollution Prevention and Toxics 3: 00 p. m. BREAK 3: 20 p. m. Discussion of Key OPPT Issues ! Are there aspects of OPPT's issues that require further clarification? ! Which issues appear most pressing for Committee attention?

NPPTAC DRAFT AGENDA 1 10/ 30/ 2003 4: 00 p. m. Discussion of Committee Issues of Interest ! Are there additional issues that Committee members would like to see addressed in the NPPTAC process? ! Which issues are of greatest interest to the Committee?

4: 30 p. m. Discussion of Initial Priority Issues ! How should the issues be prioritized?

4: 45 p. m. Public Comment 5: 15 p. m. Summary of Discussion and Closing Comments 5: 30 p. m. ADJOURN FOR THE DAY ( informal gathering)

Wednesday, November 5, 2003 8: 00 a. m. Public Attendance Registration 8: 30 a. m. Welcome and Agenda Review ! Harry Gregori, Jr., NPPTAC Co Chair, Virginia Department of Environmental Quality ! Thomas Burke, NPPTAC Co Chair, Bloomberg School of Public Health, Johns Hopkins University ! Barbara Stinson, Senior Partner, Meridian Institute 8: 45 a. m. Review of Prior Day's Discussion 9: 00 a. m. Presentation: Framework for Addressing Issues   Harry Gregori, Jr. and Thomas Burke Building upon Tuesday's discussions, the Chairs will present a potential framework for addressing some of the issues highlighted by OPPT and the Committee.

9: 20 a. m. Discussion of Framework for Addressing Issues ! Does the framework adequately capture high priority issues? ! Does the framework address the educational needs of the Committee?

10: 30 a. m. BREAK 10: 45 a. m. NPPTAC Framework Discussion ( continued)

NPPTAC DRAFT AGENDA 2 10/ 30/ 2003 NPPTAC DRAFT AGENDA 3 10/ 30/ 2003 11: 45 a. m. Public Comment 12: 15 p. m. LUNCH ( on your own)

1: 30 p. m. NPPTAC Next Steps ! Discuss next steps for work group activities including scope, membership, deliverables, timelines, etc. ! Review proposed meeting dates for 2004 ! Review timeline for summary materials from November 2003 meeting ! Review any other assignments generated over the course of the meeting 3: 15 p. m. Public Comment 3: 45 p. m. Closing Remarks   Harry Gregori, Jr. and Charles Auer 4: 00 p. m. ADJOURN MEETING


[Federal Register Volume 77, Number 117 (Monday, June 18, 2012)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Pages 36127-36129]
[FR Doc No: 2012-13800]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION

Federal Aviation Administration

14 CFR Part 39

[Docket No. FAA-2012-0188; Directorate Identifier 2011-NM-120-AD;
Amendment 39-17079; AD 2012-11-15]
RIN 2120-AA64

Airworthiness Directives; BAE SYSTEMS (Operations) Limited
Airplanes

AGENCY: Federal Aviation Administration (FAA), Department of
Transportation (DOT).

ACTION: Final rule.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: We are adopting a new airworthiness directive (AD) for all BAE
SYSTEMS (Operations) Limited Model 4101 airplanes. This AD was prompted
by reports of cracking found in the wing rear spar. This AD requires a
one-time detailed inspection for cracks, corrosion, and other defects
of the rear face of the wing rear spar, and repair if necessary. We are
issuing this AD to detect and correct cracking in the rear spar, which
could propagate to a critical length, possibly affecting the structural
integrity of the area and resulting in a fuel tank rupture, with
consequent damage to the airplane and possible injury to its occupants.

DATES: This AD becomes effective July 23, 2012.
    The Director of the Federal Register approved the incorporation by
reference of certain publications listed in this AD as of July 23,
2012.

ADDRESSES: You may examine the AD docket on the Internet at http://www.regulations.gov or in person at the U.S. Department of
Transportation, Docket Operations, M-30, West Building Ground Floor,
Room W12-140, 1200 New Jersey Avenue SE., Washington, DC.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Todd Thompson, Aerospace Engineer,

International Branch, ANM-116, Transport Airplane Directorate, FAA,
1601 Lind Avenue SW., Renton, Washington 98057-3356; telephone 425-227-
1175; fax<PHONE_NUMBER>.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

Discussion

    We issued a notice of proposed rulemaking (NPRM) to amend 14 CFR
part 39 to include an AD that would apply to the specified products.
That NPRM was published in the Federal Register on March 6, 2012 (77 FR
13228). That NPRM proposed to correct an unsafe condition for the
specified products. The MCAI states:

    Four cracks were found on a wing rear spar by an operator during
a fuel leak investigation. The cracks were located between ribs 6
and 7, immediately inboard of the inboard engine rib. The cracks
initiated at adjacent fastener bores in the rear spar upper boom and
progressed downwards, diagonally, into the rear spar web.
    Such cracking in the rear spar, if not detected and corrected,
could propagate to a critical length, possibly affecting the
structural integrity of the area and/or resulting in a fuel tank
rupture, and consequent damage to the aeroplane and injury to its
occupants.
    For the reasons described above, this [EASA] AD requires a one-
time [detailed] inspection [for cracks, corrosion, and other
defects] of the rear face of the wing rear spar and the
accomplishment of the associated corrective actions [i.e., repair],
depending on findings.

You may obtain further information by examining the MCAI in the AD
docket.

Comments

    We gave the public the opportunity to participate in developing
this AD. We received no comments on the NPRM (77 FR 13228, March 6,
2012) or on the determination of the cost to the public.

Conclusion

    We reviewed the available data and determined that air safety and
the public interest require adopting the AD as proposed, except for
minor editorial changes. We have determined that these minor changes:
     Are consistent with the intent that was proposed in the
NPRM (77 FR 13228, March 6, 2012) for correcting the unsafe condition;
and
     Do not add any additional burden upon the public than was
already proposed in the NPRM (77 FR 13228, March 6, 2012).

Costs of Compliance

    We estimate that this AD will affect 3 products of U.S. registry.
We also estimate that it will take about 25 work-hours per product to
comply with the basic requirements of this AD. The average labor rate
is $85 per work-hour. Based on these figures, we estimate the cost of
this AD to the U.S. operators to be $6,375, or $2,125 per product.
    We have received no definitive data that would enable us to provide
a cost estimates for the on-condition actions (repairing cracks,
corrosion, and defects) specified in this AD.

Authority for This Rulemaking

    Title 49 of the United States Code specifies the FAA's authority to
issue rules on aviation safety. Subtitle I, section 106, describes the
authority of the FAA Administrator. ``Subtitle VII: Aviation
Programs,'' describes in more detail the scope of the Agency's
authority.
    We are issuing this rulemaking under the authority described in
``Subtitle VII, Part A, Subpart III, Section 44701: General
requirements.'' Under that section, Congress charges the FAA with
promoting safe flight of civil aircraft in air commerce by prescribing
regulations for practices, methods, and procedures the Administrator
finds necessary for safety in air commerce. This regulation is within
the scope of that authority because it addresses an unsafe condition
that is likely to exist or develop on products identified in this
rulemaking action.

Regulatory Findings

    We determined that this AD will not have federalism implications
under Executive Order 13132. This AD will not have a substantial direct
effect on the States, on the relationship between the national
government and the States, or on the distribution of power and
responsibilities among the various levels of government.
    For the reasons discussed above, I certify that this AD:
    1. Is not a ``significant regulatory action'' under Executive Order
12866;
    2. Is not a ``significant rule'' under the DOT Regulatory Policies
and Procedures (44 FR 11034, February 26, 1979);
    3. Will not affect intrastate aviation in Alaska; and
    4. Will not have a significant economic impact, positive or
negative, on a substantial number of small entities under the criteria
of the Regulatory Flexibility Act.
    We prepared a regulatory evaluation of the estimated costs to
comply with this AD and placed it in the AD docket.

Examining the AD Docket

    You may examine the AD docket on the Internet at http://www.regulations.gov; or in person at the Docket Operations office
between 9 a.m. and 5 p.m., Monday through Friday, except Federal
holidays. The AD docket contains the NPRM (77 FR 13228, March 6, 2012),
the regulatory evaluation, any comments received, and other
information. The street address for the Docket Operations office
(telephone<PHONE_NUMBER>) is in the ADDRESSES section. Comments will
be available in the AD docket shortly after receipt.

List of Subjects in 14 CFR Part 39

    Air transportation, Aircraft, Aviation safety, Incorporation by
reference, Safety.

Adoption of the Amendment

    Accordingly, under the authority delegated to me by the
Administrator, the FAA amends 14 CFR part 39 as follows:

PART 39--AIRWORTHINESS DIRECTIVES

0
1. The authority citation for part 39 continues to read as follows:

    Authority:  49 U.S.C. 106(g), 40113, 44701.

Sec.  39.13  [Amended]

0
2. The FAA amends Sec.  39.13 by adding the following new AD:

2012-11-15 BAE SYSTEMS (Operations) Limited: Amendment 39-17079.
Docket No. FAA-2012-0188; Directorate Identifier 2011-NM-120-AD.

(a) Effective Date

    This airworthiness directive (AD) becomes effective July 23,
2012.

(b) Affected ADs

    None.

(c) Applicability

    This AD applies to BAE SYSTEMS (Operations) Limited Model 4101
airplanes, certificated in any category, all models, and all serial
numbers.

(d) Subject

    Air Transport Association (ATA) of America Code 57: Wings.

(e) Reason

    This AD was prompted by reports of cracking found in the wing
rear spar. We are issuing this AD to detect and correct cracking in
the rear spar, which could propagate to a critical length, possibly
affecting the structural integrity of the area and resulting in a
fuel tank rupture, with consequent damage to the airplane and
possible injury to its occupants.

(f) Compliance

    You are responsible for having the actions required by this AD
performed within the compliance times specified, unless the actions
have already been done.

(g) Detailed Inspection and Repair

    Within 300 flight hours after the effective date of this AD, or
before further flight if a

fuel leak is detected in the vicinity of a wing rear spar, whichever
occurs first: Do a detailed inspection for cracks, corrosion, and
other defects (defects include scratches, dents, holes, damage to
fastener holes, or damage to surface protection and finish) of the
rear face of the wing rear spars, in accordance with the
Accomplishment Instructions of BAE SYSTEMS (Operations) Limited
Alert Service Bulletin J41-A57-029, dated May 6, 2011.
    (1) If any cracking, corrosion, or other defect is found to be
within the criteria defined in Subject 57-00-00, Wings General, of
Chapter 57, Wings, of the Jetstream Series 4100 Structural Repair
Manual, Volume 1, Revision 30, dated April 15, 2007: Before further
flight, repair the damage, in accordance with the repair
instructions specified in Subject 57-00-00, Wings General, of
Chapter 57, Wings, of the Jetstream Series 4100 Structural Repair
Manual, Volume 1, Revision 30, dated April 15, 2007.
    (2) If any cracking, corrosion, or other defect is found
exceeding the criteria as specified in Subject 57-00-00, Wings
General, of Chapter 57, Wings, of the Jetstream Series 4100
Structural Repair Manual, Volume 1, Revision 30, dated April 15,
2007: Before further flight, repair the condition, in accordance
with a method approved by the Manager, International Branch, ANM-
116, Transport Airplane Directorate, FAA, or EASA (or its delegated
agent).

(h) Reporting

    Submit a report of the findings of the inspection required by
paragraph (g) of this AD, including a report of no defects, to BAE
SYSTEMS (Operations) Limited, Customer Information Department,
Prestwick International Airport, Ayrshire, KA9 2RW, Scotland, United
Kingdom; telephone +44 1292 675207; fax +44 1292 675704; email
<EMAIL_ADDRESS>Internet http://www.baesystems.com/Businesses/RegionalAircraft/index.htm, at the applicable time
specified in paragraph (h)(1) or (h)(2) of this AD.
    (1) If the inspection was done on or after the effective date of
this AD: Submit the report within 30 days after the inspection.
    (2) If the inspection was done before the effective date of this
AD: Submit the report within 30 days after the effective date of
this AD.

(i) Other FAA AD Provisions

    The following provisions also apply to this AD:
    (1) Alternative Methods of Compliance (AMOCs): The Manager,
International Branch, ANM-116, Transport Airplane Directorate, FAA,
has the authority to approve AMOCs for this AD, if requested using
the procedures found in 14 CFR 39.19. In accordance with 14 CFR
39.19, send your request to your principal inspector or local Flight
Standards District Office, as appropriate. If sending information
directly to the International Branch, send it to ATTN: Todd
Thompson, Aerospace Engineer, International Branch, ANM-116,
Transport Airplane Directorate, FAA, 1601 Lind Avenue SW., Renton,
Washington 98057-3356; telephone<PHONE_NUMBER>; fax<PHONE_NUMBER>.
Information may be emailed to<EMAIL_ADDRESS>
Before using any approved AMOC, notify your appropriate principal
inspector, or lacking a principal inspector, the manager of the
local flight standards district office/certificate holding district
office. The AMOC approval letter must specifically reference this
AD.
    (2) Airworthy Product: For any requirement in this AD to obtain
corrective actions from a manufacturer or other source, use these
actions if they are FAA-approved. Corrective actions are considered
FAA-approved if they are approved by the State of Design Authority
(or their delegated agent). You are required to assure the product
is airworthy before it is returned to service.
    (3) Reporting Requirements: A federal agency may not conduct or
sponsor, and a person is not required to respond to, nor shall a
person be subject to a penalty for failure to comply with a
collection of information subject to the requirements of the
Paperwork Reduction Act unless that collection of information
displays a current valid OMB Control Number. The OMB Control Number
for this information collection is 2120-0056. Public reporting for
this collection of information is estimated to be approximately 5
minutes per response, including the time for reviewing instructions,
completing and reviewing the collection of information. All
responses to this collection of information are mandatory. Comments
concerning the accuracy of this burden and suggestions for reducing
the burden should be directed to the FAA at: 800 Independence Ave.
SW., Washington, DC 20591, Attn: Information Collection Clearance
Officer, AES-200.

(j) Related Information

    Refer to MCAI EASA Airworthiness Directive 2011-0096, dated May
25, 2011, and the service information specified in paragraphs (j)(1)
and (j)(2) of this AD, for related information.
    (1) BAE SYSTEMS (Operations) Limited Alert Service Bulletin J41-
A57-029, dated May 6, 2011.
    (2) Subject 57-00-00, Wings General, of Chapter 57, Wings, of
the Jetstream Series 4100 Structural Repair Manual, Volume 1,
Revision 30, dated April 15, 2007.

(k) Material Incorporated by Reference

    (1) The Director of the Federal Register approved the
incorporation by reference (IBR) of the following service
information under 5 U.S.C. 552(a) and 1 CFR part 51.
    (2) You must use the following service information to do the
actions required by this AD, unless the AD specifies otherwise.
    (i) BAE SYSTEMS (Operations) Limited Alert Service Bulletin J41-
A57-029, dated May 6, 2011.
    (ii) Subject 57-00-00, Wings General, of Chapter 57, Wings, of
the Jetstream Series 4100 Structural Repair Manual, Volume 1,
Revision 30, dated April 15, 2007. The revision level and date of
this document are identified only in the Record of Revisions section
of this document.
    (3) For service information identified in this AD, contact BAE
SYSTEMS (Operations) Limited, Customer Information Department,
Prestwick International Airport, Ayrshire, KA9 2RW, Scotland, United
Kingdom; telephone +44 1292 675207; fax +44 1292 675704; email
<EMAIL_ADDRESS>Internet http://www.baesystems.com/Businesses/RegionalAircraft/index.htm.
    (4) You may review copies of the service information at the FAA,
Transport Airplane Directorate, 1601 Lind Avenue SW., Renton,
Washington. For information on the availability of this material at
the FAA, call<PHONE_NUMBER>.
    (5) You may also review copies of the service information that
is incorporated by reference at the National Archives and Records
Administration (NARA). For information on the availability of this
material at an NARA facility, call<PHONE_NUMBER>, or go to http://www.archives.gov/federal_register/code_of_federal_regulations/ibr_locations.html.

    Issued in Renton, Washington, on March 31, 2012.
Michael Kaszycki,
Acting Manager, Transport Airplane Directorate, Aircraft Certification
Service.
[FR Doc. 2012-13800 Filed 6-15-12; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910-13-P


From:
Jones, DonnaLee<EMAIL_ADDRESS>Sent:
Monday, May 16, 2016 4:33 PM
To:
May, Jeffrey X<EMAIL_ADDRESS>Cc:
Zavoda, Rich<EMAIL_ADDRESS>Hill, John R<EMAIL_ADDRESS>Maciel, Robert A<EMAIL_ADDRESS>Kiechle, Fredric S<EMAIL_ADDRESS>Raymond, Gabrielle<EMAIL_ADDRESS>Subject:
RE: Testing Related Deviations ArcelorMittal Burns Harbor for Coke MACT ICR Letter Dated April 4th, 2016

Here are our answers with one question for you all. We will respond to the quench tower question once we receive your response to our question below.

Method 201A vs Method 5 on Pushing Emission Control System (PECS); uses a stationary baghouse
 Sample using Method201A throughout the entire pushing time period and do not turn off sampling when moving from door to door until the full volume required by the method (2 dscm) is collected. This also will reduce the number of ovens pushed during testing.
 We understand that this testing may result in data that is significantly different from data collected at facilities with PCMs or sheds, i.e., data collected during sampling that is started and stopped for the pushes. Because there are at least three facilities with PECS, we will be examine the data collected and if significantly different can create a subcategory for regulatory purposes.

Request To Sample Single Points For Quench Tower
 What is the vertical distance between baffles? If baffle positions vary over the length of the quench tower, provide a table listing all levels of baffles with their height from ground.

Coal Sampling Request To Take Composite Sample During Day Rather Than One During Each Run
 Approved.

_____________________________________________________________
Regards,
Donna Lee Jones, Ph.D.
Senior Technical Advisor, Metals Sector
U. S. Environmental Protection Agency
Office of Air Quality Planning and Standards
Sector Policies and Programs Division / Metals & Inorganic Chemicals Group (D 243-02)
Research Triangle Park, NC  27711  Tele:<PHONE_NUMBER>  Fax<PHONE_NUMBER>
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
"Reasonableness never fails to be appreciated."  - anon.

From: Jones, DonnaLee<EMAIL_ADDRESS>Sent: Friday, May 13, 2016 5:21 PM
To: May, Jeffrey X<EMAIL_ADDRESS>Cc: Zavoda, Rich<EMAIL_ADDRESS>Hill, John R<EMAIL_ADDRESS>Maciel, Robert A<EMAIL_ADDRESS>Kiechle, Fredric S<EMAIL_ADDRESS>Raymond, Gabrielle<EMAIL_ADDRESS>Subject: RE: Testing Related Deviations ArcelorMittal Burns Harbor for Coke MACT ICR Letter Dated April 4th, 2016

All  -  I received your testing deviation requests and we will address your issues as soon as possible. Because of various staff schedule issues, I will not be able to meet with the measurement staff until the week of May 23. I hope to be able to provide a response by the end of that week, before holiday weekend.
_____________________________________________________________
Regards,
Donna Lee Jones, Ph.D.
Senior Technical Advisor, Metals Sector
U. S. Environmental Protection Agency
Office of Air Quality Planning and Standards
Sector Policies and Programs Division / Metals & Inorganic Chemicals Group (D 243-02)
Research Triangle Park, NC  27711  Tele:<PHONE_NUMBER>  Fax<PHONE_NUMBER>
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
"Reasonableness never fails to be appreciated."  - anon.

From: May, Jeffrey X<EMAIL_ADDRESS>Sent: Friday, May 13, 2016 2:54 PM
To: Jones, DonnaLee<EMAIL_ADDRESS>Cc: Zavoda, Rich<EMAIL_ADDRESS>Hill, John R<EMAIL_ADDRESS>Maciel, Robert A<EMAIL_ADDRESS>Kiechle, Fredric S<EMAIL_ADDRESS>Subject: Testing Related Deviations ArcelorMittal Burns Harbor for Coke MACT ICR Letter Dated April 4th, 2016

Find Attached the current ICR related testing issues for ArcelorMittal Burns Harbor, LLC, in accordance with the Coke MACT ICR requirements.
Jeffrey May | Sr. Engineer-Environmental
ArcelorMittal Burns Harbor
Maintenance, Environmental, and Utilities | 250 W US Hwy. 12
Burns Harbor, Indiana 46304
T +1<PHONE_NUMBER> | F +1<PHONE_NUMBER> | M +1<PHONE_NUMBER>


[Federal Register Volume 86, Number 195 (Wednesday, October 13, 2021)]
[Notices]
[Page 56930]
[FR Doc No: 2021-22172]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission

[Docket No. ER22-16-000]

Pattersonville Solar, LLC; Supplemental Notice That Initial
Market-Based Rate Filing Includes Request for Blanket Section 204
Authorization

    This is a supplemental notice in the above-referenced proceeding of
Pattersonville Solar, LLC's application for market-based rate
authority, with an accompanying rate tariff, noting that such
application includes a request for blanket authorization, under 18 CFR
part 34, of future issuances of securities and assumptions of
liability.
    Any person desiring to intervene or to protest should file with the
Federal Energy Regulatory Commission, 888 First Street NE, Washington,
DC 20426, in accordance with Rules 211 and 214 of the Commission's
Rules of Practice and Procedure (18 CFR 385.211 and 385.214). Anyone
filing a motion to intervene or protest must serve a copy of that
document on the Applicant.
    Notice is hereby given that the deadline for filing protests with
regard to the applicant's request for blanket authorization, under 18
CFR part 34, of future issuances of securities and assumptions of
liability, is October 25, 2021.
    The Commission encourages electronic submission of protests and
interventions in lieu of paper, using the FERC Online links at http://www.ferc.gov. To facilitate electronic service, persons with internet
access who will eFile a document and/or be listed as a contact for an
intervenor must create and validate an eRegistration account using the
eRegistration link. Select the eFiling link to log on and submit the
intervention or protests.
    Persons unable to file electronically may mail similar pleadings to
the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission, 888 First Street NE,
Washington, DC 20426. Hand delivered submissions in docketed
proceedings should be delivered to Health and Human Services, 12225
Wilkins Avenue, Rockville, Maryland 20852.
    In addition to publishing the full text of this document in the
Federal Register, the Commission provides all interested persons an
opportunity to view and/or print the contents of this document via the
internet through the Commission's Home Page (http://www.ferc.gov) using
the ``eLibrary'' link. Enter the docket number excluding the last three
digits in the docket number field to access the document. At this time,
the Commission has suspended access to the Commission's Public
Reference Room, due to the proclamation declaring a National Emergency
concerning the Novel Coronavirus Disease (COVID-19), issued by the
President on March 13, 2020. For assistance, contact the Federal Energy
Regulatory Commission at [email protected] or call toll-free,
(886) 208-3676 or TYY,<PHONE_NUMBER>.

    Dated: October 5, 2021.
Kimberly D. Bose,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2021-22172 Filed 10-12-21; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6717-01-P