[Federal Register Volume 76, Number 44 (Monday, March 7, 2011)]
[Notices]
[Page 12403]
[FR Doc No: 2011-5113]

=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION

Federal Aviation Administration

Office of Commercial Space Transportation; Notice of Availability
of the Finding of No Significant Impact (FONSI) for Actions Related to
the Renewal of a Launch Operator License for Delta II Expendable Launch
Vehicles at Cape Canaveral Air Force Station, Florida

AGENCY: Federal Aviation Administration (FAA), Department of
Transportation.

ACTION: Notice of availability of the FONSI.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: In accordance with the National Environmental Policy Act of
1969 (NEPA), 42 U.S.C. 4321-4347 (as amended), Council on Environmental
Quality NEPA implementing regulations (40 Code of Federal Regulations
[CFR] Parts 1500 to 1508), and FAA Order 1050.1E, Change 1, the FAA is
announcing the availability of a FONSI, based on the analysis and
findings of the May 1988 United States Air Force (USAF) Medium Launch
Vehicle Environmental Assessment (EA), Cape Canaveral Air Force Station
(CCAFS), Florida. The 1988 EA evaluates the potential environmental
impacts of renovating Launch Complex (LC)-17 and other support
facilities at CCAFS to support 12 annual launches of the Delta II
vehicle. USAF issued a FONSI, which concluded that the environmental
impacts associated with their Proposed Action would not significantly
impact the quality of the human environment, and therefore the
preparation of an Environmental Impact Statement (EIS) was not
required. Under the FAA's Proposed Action as stated in the FONSI, the
FAA would renew a Launch Operator License to Orbital Sciences
Corporation for the continued operation of Delta II expendable launch
vehicles at CCAFS. A Launch Operator License would authorize launches
of Delta II vehicles over the 5-year term of the license.
    In accordance with the requirements of FAA Order 1050.1E, Change 1,
paragraph 410, the FAA has independently evaluated the information
contained in the 1988 EA and has verified the continued validity of the
analysis contained in the EA. The FAA has determined that the 1988 EA
sufficiently addresses the concerns of the FAA and complies with FAA
requirements for implementing NEPA as stated in FAA Order 1050.1E,
Change 1. The FAA has determined that there is no new information or
analysis that would require preparation of a new or supplemental EA or
EIS according to the CEQ Regulations (40 CFR 1502.9(c)(1)). Therefore,
the FAA issues the FONSI concurring with the analysis of impacts and
findings in the 1988 EA and formally adopts the EA in compliance with
the requirements of 40 CFR 1506.3 to support renewing a Launch Operator
License to Boeing for the continued operation of Delta II expendable
launch vehicles at CCAFS. The 1988 EA is incorporated by reference and
is summarized as necessary in the FONSI.
    The FAA has posted the FONSI on the Internet at http://www.faa.gov/about/office_org/headquarters_offices/ast/.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Mr. Daniel Czelusniak, Environmental
Program Lead, Office of Commercial Space Transportation, Federal
Aviation Administration, 800 Independence Avenue, SW., Room 325,
Washington, DC 20591, telephone<PHONE_NUMBER>; E-mail
<EMAIL_ADDRESS>
    Issued in Washington, DC on March 1, 2011.
Michael McElligott,
Manager, Space Systems Development Division.
[FR Doc. 2011-5113 Filed 3-4-11; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4310-13-P


[Federal Register Volume 77, Number 65 (Wednesday, April 4, 2012)]
[Proposed Rules]
[Pages 20334-20337]
[FR Doc No: 2012-8095]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY

40 CFR Parts 174 and 180

[EPA-HQ-OPP-2012-0001; FRL-9340-4]

Receipt of Several Pesticide Petitions Filed for Residues of
Pesticide Chemicals in or on Various Commodities

AGENCY: Environmental Protection Agency (EPA).

ACTION: Notice of filing of petitions and request for comment.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: This document announces the Agency's receipt of several
initial filings of pesticide petitions requesting the establishment or
modification of regulations for residues of pesticide chemicals in or
on various commodities.

DATES: Comments must be received on or before May 4, 2012.

ADDRESSES: Submit your comments, identified by docket identification
(ID) number and the pesticide petition number (PP) of interest as shown
in the body of this document, by one of the following methods:
     Federal eRulemaking Portal: http://www.regulations.gov.
Follow the online instructions for submitting comments.
     Mail: Office of Pesticide Programs (OPP) Regulatory Public
Docket (7502P), Environmental Protection Agency, 1200 Pennsylvania Ave.
NW., Washington, DC 20460-0001.
     Delivery: OPP Regulatory Public Docket (7502P),
Environmental Protection Agency, Rm. S-4400, One Potomac Yard (South
Bldg.), 2777 S. Crystal Dr., Arlington, VA. Deliveries are only
accepted during the Docket Facility's normal hours of operation (8:30
a.m. to 4 p.m., Monday through Friday, excluding legal holidays).
Special arrangements should be made for deliveries of boxed
information. The Docket Facility telephone number is<PHONE_NUMBER>.
    Instructions: Direct your comments to the docket ID number and the
pesticide petition number of interest as shown in the body of this
document. EPA's policy is that all comments received will be included
in the docket without change and may be made available online at http://www.regulations.gov, including any personal information provided,
unless the comment includes information claimed to be Confidential
Business Information (CBI) or other information whose disclosure is
restricted by statute. Do not submit information that you consider to
be CBI or otherwise protected through regulations.gov or email. The
regulations.gov Web site is an ``anonymous access'' system, which means
EPA will not know your identity or contact information unless you
provide it in the body of your comment. If you send an email comment
directly to EPA without going through regulations.gov, your email
address will be automatically captured and included as part of the
comment that is placed in the docket and made available on the
Internet. If you submit an electronic comment, EPA recommends that you
include your name and other contact information in the body of your
comment and with any disk or CD-ROM you submit. If EPA cannot read your
comment due to technical difficulties and cannot contact you for
clarification, EPA may not be able to consider your comment. Electronic
files should avoid the use of special characters, any form of
encryption, and be free of any defects or viruses.
    Docket: All documents in the docket are listed in the docket index
available at http://www.regulations.gov. Although listed in the index,
some information is not publicly available, e.g., CBI or other
information whose disclosure is restricted by statute. Certain other
material, such as copyrighted material, is not placed on the Internet
and will be publicly available only in hard copy form. Publicly
available docket materials are available either in the

electronic docket at http://www.regulations.gov, or, if only available
in hard copy, at the OPP Regulatory Public Docket in Rm. S-4400, One
Potomac Yard (South Bldg.), 2777 S. Crystal Dr., Arlington, VA. The
hours of operation of this Docket Facility are from 8:30 a.m. to 4
p.m., Monday through Friday, excluding legal holidays. The Docket
Facility telephone number is<PHONE_NUMBER>.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: A contact person, with telephone
number and email address, is listed at the end of each pesticide
petition summary. You may also reach each contact person by mail at
Antimicrobials Division (7510P), or Biopesticides and Pollution
Prevention Division (7511P) or Registration Division (7505P), Office of
Pesticide Programs, Environmental Protection Agency, 1200 Pennsylvania
Ave. NW., Washington, DC 20460-0001.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

I. General Information

A. Does this action apply to me?

    You may be potentially affected by this action if you are an
agricultural producer, food manufacturer, or pesticide manufacturer.
Potentially affected entities may include, but are not limited to:
     Crop production (NAICS code 111).
     Animal production (NAICS code 112).
     Food manufacturing (NAICS code 311).
     Pesticide manufacturing (NAICS code 32532).
    This listing is not intended to be exhaustive, but rather provides
a guide for readers regarding entities likely to be affected by this
action. Other types of entities not listed in this unit could also be
affected. The North American Industrial Classification System (NAICS)
codes have been provided to assist you and others in determining
whether this action might apply to certain entities. If you have any
questions regarding the applicability of this action to a particular
entity, consult the person listed at the end of the pesticide petition
summary of interest.

B. What should I consider as I prepare my comments for EPA?

    1. Submitting CBI. Do not submit this information to EPA through
regulations.gov or email. Clearly mark the part or all of the
information that you claim to be CBI. For CBI information in a disk or
CD-ROM that you mail to EPA, mark the outside of the disk or CD-ROM as
CBI and then identify electronically within the disk or CD-ROM the
specific information that is claimed as CBI. In addition to one
complete version of the comment that includes information claimed as
CBI, a copy of the comment that does not contain the information
claimed as CBI must be submitted for inclusion in the public docket.
Information so marked will not be disclosed except in accordance with
procedures set forth in 40 CFR part 2.
    2. Tips for preparing your comments. When submitting comments,
remember to:
    i. Identify the document by docket ID number and other identifying
information (subject heading, Federal Register date and page number).
    ii. Follow directions. The Agency may ask you to respond to
specific questions or organize comments by referencing a Code of
Federal Regulations (CFR) part or section number.
    iii. Explain why you agree or disagree; suggest alternatives and
substitute language for your requested changes.
    iv. Describe any assumptions and provide any technical information
and/or data that you used.
    v. If you estimate potential costs or burdens, explain how you
arrived at your estimate in sufficient detail to allow for it to be
reproduced.
    vi. Provide specific examples to illustrate your concerns and
suggest alternatives.
    vii. Explain your views as clearly as possible, avoiding the use of
profanity or personal threats.
    viii. Make sure to submit your comments by the comment period
deadline identified.
    3. Environmental justice. EPA seeks to achieve environmental
justice, the fair treatment and meaningful involvement of any group,
including minority and/or low-income populations, in the development,
implementation, and enforcement of environmental laws, regulations, and
policies. To help address potential environmental justice issues, the
Agency seeks information on any groups or segments of the population
who, as a result of their location, cultural practices, or other
factors, may have atypical or disproportionately high and adverse human
health impacts or environmental effects from exposure to the pesticides
discussed in this document, compared to the general population.

II. What action is the Agency taking?

    EPA is announcing its receipt of several pesticide petitions filed
under section 408 of the Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act (FFDCA),
21 U.S.C. 346a, requesting the establishment or modification of
regulations in 40 CFR part 174 or part 180 for residues of pesticide
chemicals in or on various food commodities. The Agency is taking
public comment on the requests before responding to the petitioners.
EPA is not proposing any particular action at this time. EPA has
determined that the pesticide petitions described in this document
contain the data or information prescribed in FFDCA section 408(d)(2);
however, EPA has not fully evaluated the sufficiency of the submitted
data at this time or whether the data support granting of the pesticide
petitions. After considering the public comments, EPA intends to
evaluate whether and what action may be warranted. Additional data may
be needed before EPA can make a final determination on these pesticide
petitions.
    Pursuant to 40 CFR 180.7(f), a summary of each of the petitions
that are the subject of this document, prepared by the petitioner, is
included in a docket EPA has created for each rulemaking. The docket
for each of the petitions is available online at http://www.regulations.gov.
    As specified in FFDCA section 408(d)(3), (21 U.S.C. 346a(d)(3)),
EPA is publishing notice of the petition so that the public has an
opportunity to comment on this request for the establishment or
modification of regulations for residues of pesticides in or on food
commodities. Further information on the petition may be obtained
through the petition summary referenced in this unit.

New Tolerances

    1. PP 1E7869. (EPA-HQ-OPP-2012-0048). Syngenta Crop Protection,
P.O. Box 18300, Greensboro, NC 27409, requests to establish a tolerance
in 40 CFR part 180 for residues of the fungicide cyprodinil, 2-
pyrimidinamine, 4-cyclopropyl-6-methyl-N-phenyl-, in or on leafy
petioles subgroup 04B at 30 parts per million (ppm). Syngenta Crop
Protection, has developed and validated analytical methodology for
enforcement purposes. This method Syngenta Crop Protection Method AG-
631B, has passed an Agency petition method validation for several
commodities and is currently the enforcement method for cyprodinil.
Contact: Lisa Jones,<PHONE_NUMBER>, email address<EMAIL_ADDRESS>    2. PP 1E7870. (EPA-HQ-OPP-2012-0047). Syngenta Crop Protection,
P.O. Box 18300, Greensboro, NC 27409, requests to establish a tolerance
in 40 CFR part 180 for residues of the fungicide fludioxonil, 4-(2, 2-
difluoro-1,3-benzodioxol-4-yl)-1H-pyrrole-3-carbonitrile, in or on
leafy petioles subgroup 04B at 14 ppm. Syngenta Crop

Protection, has developed and validated the analytical method Syngenta
Crop Protection Method AG-597B for enforcement purposes and has also
passed an Agency petition method validation (PMV) for several
commodities. It is currently the enforcement method for fludioxonil and
has also been forwarded to the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) for
inclusion into Pesticide Analytical Manual Volume II (PAM II). Contact:
Lisa Jones,<PHONE_NUMBER>, email address<EMAIL_ADDRESS>    3. PP 1E7924. (EPA-HQ-OPP-2012-0038). Bayer CropScience, P.O. Box
12014, 2 T. W. Alexander Drive, Research Triangle Park, NC 27709,
requests to establish import tolerances in 40 CFR part 180 for residues
of the insecticide spiromesifen, 2-oxo-3-(2,4,6-trimethylphenyl)-1-
oxaspiro[4.4]non-3-en-4-yl 3,3-dimethylbutanoate and its enol
metabolite; 4-hydroxy-3-(2,4,6-trimethylphenyl)-1-oxaspiro[4.4]non-3-
en-2-one calculated as the parent compound equivalents, in or on
imported tea, dried and the processed commodity instant tea at 50 ppm.
Adequate analytical methodology using liquid chromatography/mass
spectrometry (LC/MS/MS) detection is available for enforcement
purposes. Contact: Jennifer Gaines,<PHONE_NUMBER>, email address:
<EMAIL_ADDRESS>    4. PP 1E7945. (EPA-HQ-OPP-2012-0041). Syngenta Crop Protection,
LLC, P.O. Box 18300, Greensboro, NC 27419-8300, requests to establish
an import tolerance in 40 CFR part 180 for residues of the fungicide
azoxystrobin, methyl (E)-2-[2-[6-(2-cyanophenoxy)pyrimidin-4-
yloxy]phenyl]-3-methoxyacrylate and the Z isomer of azoxystrobin,
methyl (Z)-2-[2-[6-(2-cyanophenoxy)pyrimidin-4-yloxy]pheny1]-3-
methoxyacrylate, in or on ginseng extract (red ginseng extract and
ginseng extract) at 0.5 ppm. An adequate analytical method, gas
chromatography with nitrogen-phosphorus detection (GC/NPD) or in mobile
phase by high performance liquid chromatography with ultra-violet
detection (HPLC/UV) is available for enforcement purposes with a limit
of detection that allows monitoring of food with residues at or above
the levels set in these tolerances. Contact: Erin Malone, (703) 347-
0253, email address<EMAIL_ADDRESS>    5. PP 1E7951. (EPA-HQ-OPP-2011-1011). Interregional Research
Project Number 4 (IR-4), 500 College Road East, Suite 201 W, Princeton,
NJ 08540, requests to establish tolerances in 40 CFR part 180 for
residues of the herbicide S-ethyl dipropylthiocarbamate (EPTC),
including its metabolites and degradates, determined by measuring only
the sum of S-ethyl dipropylthiocarbamate, S-ethyl (2-hydroxypropyl)
propylcarbamothioate, S-(2-hydroxyethyl)dipropylcarbamothioate, and S-
ethyl (3-hydroxypropyl)propylcarbamothioate, calculated as the
stoichiometric equivalent of S-ethyl dipropylthiocarbamate, in or on
fruit, citrus, group 10-10 at 0.1 ppm; sunflower subgroup 20B at 0.08
ppm; and watermelon at 0.08 ppm. Adequate methods are available for the
determination of EPTC and three hydroxy metabolites in crops, including
watermelon. EPTC is analyzed by extraction of the macerated samples
with toluene with subsequent quantification using GC/NPD. The three
hydroxy metabolites are extracted from macerated samples with a mixture
of acetone and water. The acetone is dispelled and the aqueous fraction
is digested with acid. The hydrolyzed metabolites are then extracted
with a mixture of hexane and ether, and the extract is purified through
a solid phase extraction cartridge. The residues are then derivatized
and quantified using a GC equipped with a mass-selective detector
(MSD). Contact: Sidney Jackson,<PHONE_NUMBER>, email address:
<EMAIL_ADDRESS>    6. PP 1E7957. (EPA-HQ-OPP-2012-0010). Interregional Research
Project Number 4 (IR-4), 500 College Road East, Suite 201 W, Princeton,
NJ 08540, requests to establish tolerances in 40 CFR part 180 for
residues of the herbicide quinclorac, 3,7-dichloro-8-
quinolinecarboxylic acid, including its metabolites and degradates
determined by measuring only quinclorac, in or on rhubarb at 0.4 ppm;
and berry, low growing, except strawberry, subgroup 13-07H at 1.1 ppm.
Adequate analytical methods, utilizing GC with electron capture
detection (GC/ECD), are available to enforce the tolerance expression
on plant (BASF Method A8902) and animal (BASF Method 268/1)
commodities. Both methods have undergone successful Agency method
validation trials, and have been submitted to the FDA for publication
in PAM II as the tolerance enforcement methods. Contact: Sidney
Jackson,<PHONE_NUMBER>, email address<EMAIL_ADDRESS>    7. PP 1E7958. (EPA-HQ-OPP-2012-0107). Interregional Research
Project Number 4 (IR-4), 500 College Road East, Suite 201 W, Princeton,
NJ 08540, requests to establish tolerances in 40 CFR part 180 for
residues of the insecticide spirotetramat, cis-3-(2,5-dimethlyphenyl)-
8-methoxy-2-oxo-1-azaspiro[4.5]dec-3-en-4-yl-ethyl carbonate and its
metabolites BYI 08330-enol cis-3-(2,5-dimethylphenyl)-4-hydroxy-8-
methoxy-1-azaspiro[4.5]dec-3-en-2-one, BYI 08330-ketohydroxy cis-3-
(2,5-dimethylphenyl)-3-hydroxy-8-methoxy-1-azaspiro[4.5]decane-2,4-
dione, BYI 08330-enol-Glc cis-3-(2,5-dimethylphenyl)-8-methoxy-2-oxo-1-
azaspiro[4.5]dec-3-en-4-yl beta-D-glucopyranoside, and BYI 08330-mono-
hydroxy cis-3-(2,5-dimethylphenyl)-4-hydroxy-8-methoxy-1-
azaspiro[4.5]decan-2-one, calculated as spirotetramat equivalents, in
or on taro, leaves at 9 ppm; watercress at 1.5 ppm; pomegranate at 0.5
ppm; banana at 4 ppm; vegetable, bulb, group 3-07 at 0.6 ppm; berry,
low growing, except strawberry, subgroup 13-07H at 0.3 ppm; bushberry,
subgroup 13-07B at 3 ppm; artichoke, globe at 2 ppm; vegetable,
fruiting, group 8-10 at 2.5 ppm; fruit, pome, group 11-10 at 0.7 ppm;
fruit, citrus, group 10-10 at 0.6 ppm; pineapple at 0.3 ppm; pineapple,
process residue at 0.36 ppm; coffee, green beans at 0.2 ppm; and
coffee, roast beans at 0.32 ppm. Spirotetramat residues are quantified
in raw agricultural commodities by HPLC/triple stage quadrupole mass
spectrometry (HPLC/MS/MS) using the stable isotopically labeled
analytes as internal standards. Contact: Laura Nollen,<PHONE_NUMBER>,
email address<EMAIL_ADDRESS>    8. PP 1F7845. (EPA-HQ-OPP-2011-0458). Bayer CropScience, 2 T. W.
Alexander Drive, P.O. Box 12014, Research Triangle Park, NC 27709,
requests to establish a tolerance in 40 CFR part 180 for residues of
the fungicide trifloxystrobin, benzeneacetic acid, (E,E)-[alpha]-
(methoxyimino)-2-[[[[1-[3-(trifluoromethyl) phenyl] ethylidene]
amino]oxy]methyl]-methyl ester, and the free form of its acid
metabolite CGA-321113, (E,E)-methoxyimino-[2-[1-(3-trifluoromethyl-
phenyl)-ethylideneaminooxymethyl]-phenyl]acetic acid, in or on
artichoke, globe at 1.0 ppm. A practical analytical method for
detecting and measuring levels of trifloxystrobin, in or on raw
agricultural commodities is based on crop specific cleanup procedures
and determination by GC/NPD. A newer analytical method is available by
LC/MS/MS with electrospray interface, operated in the positive ion
mode. Contact: Tawanda Maignan,<PHONE_NUMBER>, email address:
<EMAIL_ADDRESS>    9. PP 1F7954. (EPA-HQ-OPP-2012-0029). E. I. DuPont de Nemours and
Company, DuPont Crop Protection, 1007

Market Street, Wilmington, DE 19898, requests to establish a tolerance
in 40 CFR part 180 for residues of the chlorantraniliprole, 3-bromo-N-
[4-chloro-2-methyl-6-[(methylamino)-carbonyl]phenyl]-1-(3-chloro-2-
pyridinyl)-1H-pyrazole-5-carboxamide, in or on oilseed, rapeseed,
subgroup 20A at 2.0 ppm; oilseed, sunflower, subgroup 20B at 2.0 ppm;
oilseed, cottonseed, subgroup 20C at 0.3 ppm; soybean, aspirated grain
fractions at 300 ppm; vegetable, legume, group 6 at 2.0 ppm; vegetable,
foliage of legume, group 7 at 30 ppm; and forage, vegetable, foliage of
legume, group 7 at 90 ppm. An analytical residue method has been
submitted to EPA which permits determination of trace residues of the
parent compound on various food and feed commodities. Contact: Jennifer
Urbanski,<PHONE_NUMBER>, email address<EMAIL_ADDRESS>
Amended Tolerances

    1. PP 1E7951. (EPA-HQ-OPP-2011-1011). Interregional Research
Project Number 4 (IR-4), 500 College Road East, Suite 201 W, Princeton,
NJ 08540, requests to amend the tolerances in 40 CFR 180.117 for
residues of the herbicide S -ethyl dipropylthiocarbamate (EPTC),
including its metabolites and degradates, determined by measuring only
the sum of S -ethyl dipropylthiocarbamate, S -ethyl (2-hydroxypropyl)
propylcarbamothioate, S -(2-hydroxyethyl)dipropylcarbamothioate, and S
-ethyl (3-hydroxypropyl)propylcarbamothioate, calculated as the
stoichiometric equivalent of S -ethyl dipropylthiocarbamate, by
removing the following established tolerances: Fruit, citrus, group 10
at 0.1 ppm; safflower, seed at 0.08 ppm; and sunflower, seed at 0.08
ppm, as these commodities are included in updated crop groups or
subgroups listed under ``New Tolerances'' for PP 1E7951. Contact:
Sidney Jackson,<PHONE_NUMBER>, email address<EMAIL_ADDRESS>    2. PP 1E7958. (EPA-HQ-OPP-2012-0107). Interregional Research
Project Number 4 (IR-4), 500 College Road East, Suite 201 W, Princeton,
NJ 08540, requests to amend 40 CFR 180.641 for residues of the
insecticide spirotetramat, cis-3-(2,5-dimethlyphenyl)-8-methoxy-2-oxo-
1-azaspiro[4.5]dec-3-en-4-yl-ethyl carbonate and its metabolites BYI
08330-enol cis-3-(2,5-dimethylphenyl)-4-hydroxy-8-methoxy-1-
azaspiro[4.5]dec-3-en-2-one, BYI 08330-ketohydroxy cis-3-(2,5-
dimethylphenyl)-3-hydroxy-8-methoxy-1-azaspiro[4.5]decane-2,4-dione,
BYI 08330-enol-Glc cis-3-(2,5-dimethylphenyl)-8-methoxy-2-oxo-1-
azaspiro[4.5]dec-3-en-4-yl beta-D-glucopyranoside, and BYI 08330-mono-
hydroxy cis-3-(2,5-dimethylphenyl)-4-hydroxy-8-methoxy-1-
azaspiro[4.5]decan-2-one, calculated as spirotetramat equivalents, by
removing the established tolerances: Onion, bulb, subgroup 3A-07 at
0.30 ppm; fruit, citrus, group 10 at 0.60 ppm; fruit, pome, group 11 at
0.70 ppm; okra at 2.5 ppm; and vegetable, fruiting, group 8 at 2.5 ppm,
as they will be superseded by inclusion in updated crop groups or
subgroups listed under ``New Tolerances''. Contact: Laura Nollen, (703)
305-7390, email address<EMAIL_ADDRESS>
New Tolerance Exemptions

    1. PP 1E7912. (EPA-HQ-OPP-2012-0014). ICR, Inc., 1330 Dillon
Heights Ave, Catonsville, MD on behalf of Triton Systems, Inc., 200
Turnpike Road, Chelmsford, MA 01824, requests to establish an exemption
from the requirement of a tolerance for residues of 1,2-Ethanediamine,
N1-(2-aminoethyl)-, polymer with 2,4-diisocyanato-1-methylbenzene, with
number average molecular weight greater than 10,000 daltons, (CAS No.
35297-61-1) under 40 CFR 180.960 when used as a pesticide inert
ingredient microencapsulation in pesticide formulations. The petitioner
believes no analytical method is needed because this information is
generally not required when all criteria for polymer exemption under 40
CFR 723.250 are met. Contact: Anthony Britten,<PHONE_NUMBER>, email
address<EMAIL_ADDRESS>    2. PP 1E7938. (EPA-HQ-OPP-2012-0043). Honeywell International,
Inc., 101 Columbia Road, Morristown, NJ 07962-1053, requests to
establish an exemption from the requirement of a tolerance for residues
of trans-1,3,3,3-tetrafluoroprop-1-ene, (CAS No. 29118-24-9) under 40
CFR 180.910, 180.930, and 180.940 when used as a pesticide inert
ingredient propellant in pesticide formulations. The petitioner
believes no analytical method is needed because this is a petition for
exemption from the requirement of a tolerance. Contact: Lisa Austin,
(703) 305-7894, email address<EMAIL_ADDRESS>    3. PP 1F7960. (EPA-HQ-OPP-2012-0152). Enerfab, Inc., 4955 Spring
Grove Avenue, Cincinnati, OH 45232, requests to establish an exemption
from the requirement of a tolerance for residues of the antimicrobial
gaseous chlorine dioxide, on tomato. EPA Method 300, Ion
Chromatography, was used for measuring chlorite and chlorate residues
rinsed from surface of produce treated with chlorine dioxide gas.
Contact: Jaclyn Carl,<PHONE_NUMBER>, email address:
<EMAIL_ADDRESS>
Amended Tolerance Exemption

    PP 1F7857. (EPA-HQ-OPP-2012-0109). Syngenta Seeds, Inc., Field
Crops NAFTA, P.O. Box 12257, 3054 E. Cornwallis Road, Research Triangle
Park, NC 27709-2257, requests to amend an exemption from the
requirement of a tolerance in 40 CFR 174.532 for residues of the plant-
incorporated protectant (PIP), Bacillus thuringiensis eCry3.1Ab protein
in corn, in or on the food and feed commodities of corn; corn, field;
corn, sweet; and corn, pop. The petitioner believes no analytical
method is needed because an exemption from the requirement of a
tolerance is being sought. However, in response to an Agency request,
the Petitioner has submitted an immunoassay method for determination of
eCry3.1Ab protein in corn tissues. Contact: Mike Mendelsohn, (703) 308-
8715, email address<EMAIL_ADDRESS>
List of Subjects in 40 CFR Parts 174 and 180

    Environmental protection, Agricultural commodities, Feed additives,
Food additives, Pesticides and pests, Reporting and recordkeeping
requirements.

    Dated: March 16, 2012.
Lois Rossi,
Director, Registration Division, Office of Pesticide Programs.
[FR Doc. 2012-8095 Filed 4-3-12; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6560-50-P


[Federal Register Volume 81, Number 233 (Monday, December 5, 2016)]
[Notices]
[Pages 87565-87566]
[FR Doc No: 2016-29117]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES

Food and Drug Administration

[Docket No. FDA-2009-D-0600]

Health Document Submission Requirements for Tobacco Products;
Guidance for Industry; Availability

AGENCY: Food and Drug Administration, HHS.

ACTION: Notice of availability.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Food and Drug Administration (FDA or we) is announcing the
availability of a revised guidance for industry entitled ``Health
Document Submission Requirements for Tobacco Products.'' The guidance
provides information to assist persons making health document
submissions to FDA as required by the Family Smoking Prevention and
Tobacco Control Act. We received several comments to the draft
guidance, and those comments were considered as the guidance was
finalized.

DATES: Submit either electronic or written comments on Agency guidances
at any time.

ADDRESSES: You may submit comments as follows:

Electronic Submissions

    Submit electronic comments in the following way:
     Federal eRulemaking Portal: http://www.regulations.gov.
Follow the instructions for submitting comments. Comments submitted
electronically, including attachments, to http://www.regulations.gov
will be posted to the docket unchanged. Because your comment will be
made public, you are solely responsible for ensuring that your comment
does not include any confidential information that you or a third party
may not wish to be posted, such as medical information, your or anyone
else's Social Security number, or confidential business information,
such as a manufacturing process. Please note that if you include your
name, contact information, or other information that identifies you in
the body of your comments, that information will be posted on http://www.regulations.gov.
     If you want to submit a comment with confidential
information that you do not wish to be made available to the public,
submit the comment as a written/paper submission and in the manner
detailed (see ``Written/Paper Submissions'' and ``Instructions'').

Written/Paper Submissions

    Submit written/paper submissions as follows:
     Mail/Hand delivery/Courier (for written/paper
submissions): Division of Dockets Management (HFA-305), Food and Drug
Administration, 5630 Fishers Lane, Rm. 1061, Rockville, MD 20852.
     For written/paper comments submitted to the Division of
Dockets Management, FDA will post your comment, as well as any
attachments, except for information submitted, marked and identified,
as confidential, if submitted as detailed in ``Instructions.''
    Instructions: All submissions received must include the Docket No.
FDA-2009-D-0600 for ``Health Document Submission Requirements for
Tobacco Products.'' Received comments will be placed in the docket and,
except for those submitted as ``Confidential Submissions,'' publicly
viewable at http://www.regulations.gov or at the Division of Dockets
Management between 9 a.m. and 4 p.m., Monday through Friday.
     Confidential Submissions--To submit a comment with
confidential information that you do not wish to be

made publicly available, submit your comments only as a written/paper
submission. You should submit two copies total. One copy will include
the information you claim to be confidential with a heading or cover
note that states ``THIS DOCUMENT CONTAINS CONFIDENTIAL INFORMATION.''
The Agency will review this copy, including the claimed confidential
information, in its consideration of comments. The second copy, which
will have the claimed confidential information redacted/blacked out,
will be available for public viewing and posted on http://www.regulations.gov. Submit both copies to the Division of Dockets
Management. If you do not wish your name and contact information to be
made publicly available, you can provide this information on the cover
sheet and not in the body of your comments and you must identify this
information as ``confidential.'' Any information marked as
``confidential'' will not be disclosed except in accordance with 21 CFR
10.20 and other applicable disclosure law. For more information about
FDA's posting of comments to public dockets, see 80 FR 56469, September
18, 2015, or access the information at: http://www.fda.gov/regulatoryinformation/dockets/default.htm.
    Docket: For access to the docket to read background documents or
the electronic and written/paper comments received, go to http://www.regulations.gov and insert the docket number, found in brackets in
the heading of this document, into the ``Search'' box and follow the
prompts and/or go to the Division of Dockets Management, 5630 Fishers
Lane, Rm. 1061, Rockville, MD 20852.
    Submit written requests for single copies of the guidance to the
Center for Tobacco Products, Food and Drug Administration, 10903 New
Hampshire Ave., Document Control Center, Bldg. 71, Rm. G335, Silver
Spring, MD 20993-0002. Send two self-addressed adhesive labels to
assist that office in processing your requests. See the SUPPLEMENTARY
INFORMATION section for electronic access to the guidance document.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Katherine Collins, Center for Tobacco
Products, Food and Drug Administration, 10903 New Hampshire Ave.,
Document Control Center, Bldg. 71, Rm. G335, Silver Spring, MD 20993-
0002, 1-877-287-1373, email<EMAIL_ADDRESS>
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

I. Background

    FDA is announcing the availability of a revised guidance for
industry entitled ``Health Document Submission Requirements for Tobacco
Products.''
    The revised guidance includes guidance for manufacturers or
importers of newly deemed tobacco products that are subject to chapter
IX of the Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act (the FD&C Act) (21
U.S.C. 387). Cigarettes, cigarette tobacco, roll-your-own, and
smokeless tobacco were immediately subject to chapter IX of the FD&C
Act, including section 904(a)(4), which requires the submission of
certain health documents. Section 901(b) of the FD&C Act grants FDA
authority to deem all other tobacco products subject to chapter IX of
the FD&C Act as well. Pursuant to that authority, FDA issued a final
rule deeming all other products that meet the statutory definition of
``tobacco product,'' set forth in section 201(rr) of the FD&C Act (21
U.S.C. 321(rr)), except for accessories of those products, subject to
the Chapter IX of the FD&C Act (81 FR 28973). FDA published the final
rule on May 10, 2016 (81 FR 28973) and it became effective on August 8,
2016. Therefore, manufacturers and importers of such tobacco products
are now required to comply with chapter IX of the FD&C Act, including
section 904(a)(4).

II. Significance of Guidance

    FDA is issuing this guidance consistent with FDA's good guidance
practices regulation (21 CFR 10.115). The guidance represents the
current thinking of FDA on health document submission requirements. It
does not establish any rights for any person and is not binding on FDA
or the public. You can use an alternative approach if it satisfies the
requirements of the applicable statutes and regulations.

III. Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995

    This guidance also refers to previously approved collections of
information found in FDA statute. The guidance includes information and
recommendations for how to provide health document submissions. The
collections of information in section 904 (a)(4) of the FD&C Act have
been approved under OMB control number 0910-0654.

IV. Electronic Access

    Persons with access to the Internet may obtain an electronic
version of the guidance at either http://www.regulations.gov or http://www.fda.gov/TobaccoProducts/Labeling/RulesRegulationsGuidance/default.htm.

    Dated: November 29, 2016.
Leslie Kux,
Associate Commissioner for Policy.
[FR Doc. 2016-29117 Filed 12-2-16; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4164-01-P


Fort Wayne Metropolitan Area County Site 1st 2nd 3rd 4th 01 03 ave Critical Valu02 04 Ave Allen County Leo HS 0.084 0.097 0.092 0.09 0.088 0.072 0.085 fw hun roanok Fort Wayne Metropolitan Area EIGHT HOUR OZONE AVERAGES ( PPM) Updated : 10/ 03/ 05 Allen County Year 1st Date 2nd Date 3rd Date 4th Date Days => 0.085 ppm 3 Year Priod Site Design Value 1995 0.104 0.099 0.098 0.097 11 Leo HS 1996 0.091 0.088 0.088 0.087 4 1997 0.089 7/ 12 0.087 5/ 24 0.087 6/ 24 0.086 6/ 29 5 ( 95 97 ave) 0.090 1998 0.096 5/ 15 0.092 9/ 13 0.091 7/ 13 0.089 5/ 19 8 ( 96 98 ave) 0.087 1999 0.093 9/ 3 0.093 6/ 23 0.091 7/ 16 0.090 9/ 4 12 ( 97 99 ave) 0.088 2000 0.098 6/ 9 0.096 6/ 1 0.091 6/ 8 0.091 7/ 27 4 ( 98 00 ave) 0.090 2001 0.093 6/ 28 0.089 7/ 20 0.083 6/ 13 0.082 7/ 16 2 ( 99 01 ave) 0.087 2002 0.096 8/ 1 0.094 7/ 14 0.094 7/ 15 0.093 6/ 23 13 ( 00 02 ave) 0.088 2003 0.104 6/ 25 0.097 6/ 24 0.092 6/ 18 0.090 6/ 23 4 ( 01 03 ave) 0.088 2004 0.084 7/ 1 0.080 9/ 22 0.074 4/ 16 0.073 7/ 2 0 ( 02 04 ave) 0.085 2005 0.091 7/ 11 0.087 7/ 10 0.087 8/ 2 0.086 6/ 21 8 ( 03 05 ave) 0.083 Year 1st Date 2nd Date 3rd Date 4th Date Days => 0.085 ppm 3 Year Priod Site Design Value 1995 0.100 0.099 0.091 0.090 5 Fort Wayne 1996 0.097 0.096 0.095 0.094 10 1997 0.090 5/ 24 0.089 7/ 12 0.088 7/ 13 0.087 6/ 24 7 ( 95 97 ave) 0.090 1998 0.094 5/ 15 0.091 9/ 13 0.09 9/ 12 0.089 7/ 13 5 ( 96 98 ave) 0.090 1999 0.094 9/ 3 0.088 6/ 22 0.088 6/ 23 0.088 9/ 2 11 ( 97 99 ave) 0.088 2000 0.088 6/ 9 0.083 6/ 1 0.082 7/ 27 0.081 6/ 8 1 ( 98 00 ave) 0.086 2001 0.079 6/ 28 0.079 7/ 20 0.076 6/ 19 0.074 7/ 16 0 ( 99 01 ave) 0.081 2002 0.100 8/ 1 0.098 9/ 9 0.097 7/ 14 0.097 8/ 10 15 ( 00 02 ave) 0.084 2003 0.101 6/ 25 0.096 6/ 24 0.085 6/ 23 0.084 7/ 3 3 ( 01 03 ave) 0.085 2004 0.078 7/ 1 0.078 9/ 22 0.074 7/ 2 0.069 4/ 16 0 ( 02 04 ave) 0.083 2005 0.084 7/ 10 0.077 7/ 11 0.077 9/ 13 0.076 6/ 26 0 ( 03 05 ave) 0.076 Huntington County Year 1st Date 2nd Date 3rd Date 4th Date Days => 0.085 ppm 3 Year Priod Site Design Value 2000 0.093 6/ 9 0.091 6/ 1 0.087 6/ 8 0.087 7/ 27 4 ( 00 ave) 0.087 Roanoke 2001 0.085 6/ 19 0.083 6/ 18 0.082 6/ 14 0.082 6/ 28 1 ( 00 01 ave) 0.084 2002 0.090 7/ 14 0.090 8/ 1 0.090 8/ 10 0.089 6/ 22 10 ( 00 02 ave) 0.086 2003 0.105 6/ 25 0.091 6/ 18 0.091 6/ 24 0.083 8/ 25 3 ( 01 03 ave) 0.084 2004 0.075 7/ 2 0.071 4/ 16 0.071 9/ 22 0.069 4/ 29 0 ( 02 04 ave) 0.080 2005 0.082 6/ 8 0.082 7/ 11 0.080 6/ 27 0.078 9/ 13 0 ( 03 05 ave) 0.076 INDIANA OZONE  DAILY MAXIMUM 8 HOUR AVERAGES 1995  2005 3 Year Average of 4th High 3 Year Average of 4th High 3 Year Average of 4th High 2 1/ 5/ 2006 INDIANA OZONE  DAILY MAXIMUM 8 HOUR AVERAGES 1995  2005 Louisville, KY Metropolitan Area EIGHT HOUR OZONE AVERAGES ( PPM)

Clark County Year 1st Date 2nd Date 3rd Date 4th Date Days => 0.085 ppm 3 Year Priod Site Design Value 1995 0.114 0.111 0.108 0.100 18 Charlestown 1996 0.094 0.090 0.082 0.081 2 1997 0.111 7/ 17 0.101 7/ 12 0.097 6/ 24 0.097 7/ 18 10 ( 95 97 ave) 0.092 1998 0.132 9/ 13 0.112 9/ 12 0.109 9/ 5 0.104 5/ 19 22 ( 96 98 ave) 0.094 1999 0.096 6/ 22 0.091 6/ 10 0.089 6/ 11 0.089 7/ 30 11 ( 97 99 ave) 0.096 2000 0.088 6/ 9 0.088 8/ 17 0.087 6/ 1 0.085 7/ 2 4 ( 98 00 ave) 0.092 2001 0.096 5/ 5 0.088 7/ 16 0.087 6/ 19 0.086 6/ 13 4 ( 99 01 ave) 0.086 2002 0.103 7/ 8 0.101 8/ 1 0.101 8/ 10 0.100 9/ 7 17 ( 00 02 ave) 0.090 2003 0.096 6/ 23 0.092 6/ 24 0.092 8/ 20 0.090 6/ 30 4 ( 01 03 ave) 0.092 2004 0.080 6/ 30 0.078 8/ 19 0.076 8/ 8 0.074 6/ 5 0 ( 02 04 ave) 0.088 2005 0.098 6/ 24 0.092 6/ 25 0.086 8/ 11 0.080 7/ 10 3 ( 03 05 ave) 0.081 Floyd County Year 1st Date 2nd Date 3rd Date 4th Date Days => 0.085 ppm 3 Year Priod Site Design Value 1995 0.099 0.096 0.095 0.094 14 New Albany 1996 0.113 0.107 0.093 0.092 16 1997 0.109 7/ 17 0.107 6/ 28 0.089 6/ 23 0.084 7/ 13 3 ( 95 97 ave) 0.090 1998 0.119 9/ 13 0.115 5/ 14 0.101 5/ 19 0.100 8/ 22 14 ( 96 98 ave) 0.092 1999 0.109 6/ 22 0.099 6/ 21 0.094 6/ 10 0.094 7/ 30 10 ( 97 99 ave) 0.092 2000 0.080 7/ 27 0.080 8/ 17 0.077 7/ 8 0.077 8/ 14 0 ( 98 00 ave) 0.090 2001 0.084 8/ 1 0.080 6/ 18 0.077 8/ 7 0.076 8/ 2 0 ( 99 01 ave) 0.082 2002 0.112 9/ 8 0.101 7/ 8 0.099 9/ 6 0.097 8/ 10 13 ( 00 02 ave) 0.083 2003 0.097 6/ 23 0.097 6/ 24 0.092 6/ 30 0.086 7/ 30 4 ( 01 03 ave) 0.086 2004 0.079 6/ 30 0.078 6/ 5 0.077 8/ 19 0.071 5/ 8 0 ( 02 04 ave) 0.084 2005 0.092 6/ 25 0.086 6/ 24 0.081 8/ 2 0.080 8/ 11 2 ( 03 05 ave) 0.079 3 Year Average of 4th High 3 Year Average of 4th High 3 1/ 5/ 2006 INDIANA OZONE  DAILY MAXIMUM 8 HOUR AVERAGES 1995  2005 Indianapolis Metropolitan Area EIGHT HOUR OZONE AVERAGES ( PPM)

Marion County Year 1st Date 2nd Date 3rd Date 4th Date Days => 0.085 ppm 3 Year Priod Site Design Value 1995 0.095 0.093 0.092 0.089 7 Mann Rd. 1996 0.098 0.097 0.097 0.092 5 1997 0.089 6/ 28 0.086 5/ 24 0.085 9/ 16 0.084 7/ 12 3 ( 95 97 ave) 0.088 1998 0.096 5/ 19 0.094 9/ 14 0.093 5/ 14 0.092 9/ 12 9 ( 96 98 ave) 0.089 1999 0.094 5/ 29 0.093 6/ 21 0.093 9/ 4 0.090 9/ 2 9 ( 97 99 ave) 0.088 2000 0.089 6/ 9 0.086 6/ 1 0.082 6/ 8 0.082 7/ 27 2 ( 98 00 ave) 0.088 2001 0.080 6/ 13 0.080 6/ 19 0.080 8/ 6 0.078 5/ 6 0 ( 99 01 ave) 0.083 2002 0.102 6/ 21 0.100 6/ 22 0.099 7/ 15 0.093 8/ 10 11 ( 00 02 ave) 0.084 2003 0.087 6/ 18 0.087 6/ 25 0.075 4/ 16 0.074 4/ 14 2 ( 01 03 ave) 0.081 2004 0.071 4/ 16 0.068 4/ 29 0.068 7/ 2 0.065 5/ 8 0 ( 02 04 ave) 0.077 2005 0.083 7/ 9 0.081 6/ 26 0.077 7/ 31 0.076 6/ 24 0 ( 03 05 ave) 0.071 Year 1st Date 2nd Date 3rd Date 4th Date Days => 0.085 ppm 3 Year Priod Site Design Value 1995 0.104 0.098 0.095 0.091 8 Harding St. 1996 0.105 0.099 0.098 0.096 7 1997 0.093 6/ 28 0.093 7/ 20 0.087 9/ 16 0.085 5/ 24 6 ( 95 97 ave) 0.090 1998 0.092 9/ 12 0.089 9/ 5 0.088 5/ 15 0.087 9/ 13 7 ( 96 98 ave) 0.089 1999 0.099 5/ 29 0.096 6/ 22 0.095 6/ 21 0.094 6/ 10 7 ( 97 99 ave) 0.088 2000 0.088 6/ 9 0.086 7/ 27 0.085 6/ 1 0.078 6/ 8 3 ( 98 00 ave) 0.086 2001 0.088 6/ 13 0.087 5/ 6 0.085 6/ 19 0.081 8/ 6 3 ( 99 01 ave) 0.084 2002 0.117 6/ 21 0.111 6/ 22 0.100 7/ 15 0.099 8/ 10 12 ( 00 02 ave) 0.086 2003 0.097 6/ 18 0.089 6/ 25 0.077 6/ 24 0.075 8/ 28 2 ( 01 03 ave) 0.085 2004 0.070 7/ 2 0.068 9/ 22 0.066 6/ 6 0.066 6/ 6 0 ( 02 04 ave) 0.080 2005 0.089 6/ 26 0.084 7/ 9 0.082 7/ 10 0.081 4/ 17 1 ( 03 05 ave) 0.074 Year 1st Date 2nd Date 3rd Date 4th Date Days => 0.085 ppm 3 Year Priod Site Design Value 1995 0.106 0.101 0.099 0.099 15 Fort Benjamin Harrison 1996 0.122 0.101 0.099 0.096 10 1997 0.105 7/ 12 0.095 8/ 1 0.092 7/ 25 0.090 7/ 17 8 ( 95 97 ave) 0.095 1998 0.102 9/ 13 0.097 9/ 12 0.096 5/ 14 0.095 5/ 15 14 ( 96 98 ave) 0.093 1999 0.101 5/ 29 0.101 9/ 1 0.096 6/ 10 0.096 6/ 22 11 ( 97 99 ave) 0.093 2000 0.098 6/ 9 0.091 6/ 1 0.089 7/ 27 0.083 6/ 8 3 ( 98 00 ave) 0.091 2001 0.098 7/ 31 0.091 6/ 13 0.089 8/ 8 0.087 6/ 19 6 ( 99 01 ave) 0.088 2002 0.112 6/ 21 0.105 6/ 22 0.104 7/ 15 0.100 8/ 10 11 ( 00 02 ave) 0.090 2003 0.104 6/ 18 0.096 6/ 24 0.094 6/ 25 0.091 6/ 23 5 ( 01 03 ave) 0.092 2004 0.074 6/ 30 0.074 7/ 2 0.074 8/ 1 0.073 4/ 16 0 ( 02 04 ave) 0.088 2005 0.087 6/ 24 0.082 6/ 25 0.081 6/ 30 0.080 6/ 26 1 ( 03 05 ave) 0.081 3 Year Average of 4th High 3 Year Average of 4th High 3 Year Average of 4th High 4 1/ 5/ 2006 INDIANA OZONE  DAILY MAXIMUM 8 HOUR AVERAGES 1995  2005 Indianapolis Metropolitan Area EIGHT HOUR OZONE AVERAGES ( PPM)

Year 1st Date 2nd Date 3rd Date 4th Date Days => 0.085 ppm 3 Year Priod Site Design Value 1995 0.104 0.096 0.094 0.091 12 Naval Air Warfare Center 1996 0.125 0.099 0.094 0.090 6 1997 0.094 7/ 12 0.089 8/ 1 0.088 7/ 17 0.086 8/ 3 5 ( 95 97 ave) 0.089 1998 0.095 5/ 14 0.094 5/ 15 0.093 9/ 12 0.093 9/ 13 8 ( 96 98 ave) 0.089 1999 0.099 5/ 29 0.098 6/ 10 0.096 6/ 22 0.096 9/ 1 8 ( 97 99 ave) 0.091 2000 0.092 6/ 9 0.091 6/ 1 0.083 7/ 27 0.082 6/ 8 2 ( 98 00 ave) 0.090 2001 0.094 7/ 31 0.085 5/ 6 0.081 8/ 7 0.079 8/ 6 2 ( 99 01 ave) 0.085 2002 0.131 6/ 21 0.111 7/ 15 0.107 7/ 16 0.106 6/ 22 16 ( 00 02 ave) 0.089 2003 0.101 6/ 18 0.088 6/ 24 0.087 6/ 25 0.082 6/ 23 3 ( 01 03 ave) 0.089 2004 0.075 6/ 30 0.075 7/ 1 0.073 9/ 22 0.071 4/ 16 0 ( 02 04 ave) 0.086 2005 0.082 6/ 24 0.081 6/ 25 0.081 6/ 27 0.080 6/ 26 0 ( 03 05 ave) 0.077 Hendricks County Year 1st Date 2nd Date 3rd Date 4th Date Days => 0.085 ppm 3 Year Priod Site Design Value 2000 0.095 6/ 9 0.094 6/ 1 0.088 7/ 27 0.087 6/ 8 4 ( 00 ave) 0.087 Avon 2001 0.089 8/ 6 0.088 6/ 13 0.085 6/ 19 0.083 5/ 6 3 ( 00 01 ave) 0.085 2002 0.114 6/ 22 0.102 6/ 21 0.097 8/ 10 0.095 7/ 15 9 ( 00 02 ave) 0.088 2003 0.088 6/ 18 0.086 6/ 25 0.081 6/ 24 0.079 6/ 23 2 ( 01 03 ave) 0.085 2004 0.075 4/ 16 0.073 6/ 30 0.071 7/ 2 0.071 9/ 22 0 ( 02 04 ave) 0.081 2005 0.087 6/ 26 0.081 9/ 9 0.079 8/ 1 0.078 7/ 10 1 ( 03 05 ave) 0.076 Boone County Year 1st Date 2nd Date 3rd Date 4th Date Days => 0.085 ppm 3 Year Priod Site Design Value 2000 0.092 6/ 9 0.091 6/ 1 0.084 6/ 8 0.082 7/ 27 2 ( 00 ave) 0.082 Whitestown 2001 0.096 6/ 13 0.090 6/ 19 0.085 5/ 6 0.084 6/ 28 3 ( 00 01 ave) 0.083 2002 0.115 6/ 22 0.115 6/ 23 0.104 6/ 21 0.099 7/ 15 13 ( 00 02 ave) 0.088 2003 0.101 6/ 18 0.095 6/ 25 0.093 6/ 24 0.088 8/ 20 6 ( 01 03 ave) 0.090 2004 0.089 7/ 2 0.081 9/ 22 0.073 9/ 1 0.072 9/ 2 1 ( 02 04 ave) 0.086 2005 0.088 6/ 27 0.083 9/ 11 0.082 6/ 24 0.082 6/ 26 1 ( 03 05 ave) 0.080 Shelby County Year 1st Date 2nd Date 3rd Date 4th Date Days => 0.085 ppm 3 Year Priod Site Design Value 2000 0.097 6/ 9 0.092 6/ 8 0.089 6/ 1 0.087 7/ 27 4 ( 00 ave) 0.087 Fairland 2001 0.098 8/ 7 0.095 6/ 13 0.095 6/ 18 0.093 6/ 19 6 ( 00 01 ave) 0.090 2002 0.117 7/ 15 0.105 7/ 16 0.105 6/ 21 0.101 6/ 22 15 ( 00 02 ave) 0.093 2003 0.097 6/ 18 0.093 6/ 24 0.090 6/ 23 0.089 6/ 25 4 ( 01 03 ave) 0.094 2004 0.079 7/ 1 0.073 8/ 3 0.071 6/ 7 0.071 4/ 16 0 ( 02 04 ave) 0.087 2005 0.084 6/ 26 0.083 6/ 21 0.082 6/ 24 0.080 4/ 17 0 ( 03 05 ave) 0.080 3 Year Average of 4th High 3 Year Average of 4th High 3 Year Average of 4th High 3 Year Average of 4th High 5 1/ 5/ 2006 INDIANA OZONE  DAILY MAXIMUM 8 HOUR AVERAGES 1995  2005 Indianapolis Metropolitan Area EIGHT HOUR OZONE AVERAGES ( PPM)

Johnson County Year 1st Date 2nd Date 3rd Date 4th Date Days => 0.085 ppm 3 Year Priod Site Design Value 1997 0.095 6/ 28 0.086 9/ 16 0.084 7/ 18 0.084 8/ 1 2 ( 97 ave) 0.084 Trafalgar 1998 0.093 5/ 19 0.093 9/ 12 0.091 8/ 22 0.090 8/ 21 12 ( 97 98 ave) 0.087 1999 0.099 5/ 29 0.097 6/ 10 0.096 6/ 21 0.095 6/ 22 10 ( 97 99 ave) 0.089 2000 0.091 6/ 8 0.091 6/ 9 0.085 6/ 1 0.084 7/ 27 3 ( 98 00 ave) 0.089 2001 0.086 6/ 19 0.085 6/ 13 0.082 5/ 4 0.082 5/ 6 2 ( 99 01 ave) 0.087 2002 0.111 7/ 15 0.100 8/ 10 0.097 6/ 22 0.097 7/ 16 11 ( 00 02 ave) 0.087 2003 0.091 6/ 18 0.087 6/ 25 0.081 4/ 14 0.080 8/ 21 2 ( 01 03 ave) 0.086 2004 0.079 9/ 22 0.075 4/ 16 0.074 7/ 1 0.073 6/ 30 0 ( 02 04 ave) 0.083 2005 0.091 7/ 9 0.080 6/ 26 0.079 6/ 24 0.077 6/ 21 1 ( 03 05 ave) 0.076 Morgan County Year 1st Date 2nd Date 3rd Date 4th Date Days => 0.085 ppm 3 Year Priod Site Design Value 1997 0.091 6/ 28 0.089 5/ 24 0.088 6/ 24 0.088 7/ 17 7 ( 97 ave) 0.088 Monrovia 1998 0.097 5/ 19 0.093 9/ 12 0.092 9/ 13 0.090 8/ 22 10 ( 97 98 ave) 0.089 1999 0.097 5/ 29 0.097 9/ 2 0.097 9/ 4 0.093 5/ 11 11 ( 97 99 ave) 0.090 2000 0.093 6/ 1 0.093 6/ 9 0.090 7/ 27 0.088 6/ 8 5 ( 98 00 ave) 0.090 2001 0.089 8/ 6 0.088 6/ 19 0.084 6/ 13 0.082 5/ 3 2 ( 99 01 ave) 0.087 2002 0.101 6/ 21 0.101 6/ 22 0.096 7/ 15 0.094 7/ 7 13 ( 00 02 ave) 0.088 2003 0.088 6/ 18 0.088 6/ 25 0.083 4/ 14 0.081 7/ 3 2 ( 01 03 ave) 0.085 2004 0.075 6/ 30 0.073 9/ 22 0.072 4/ 16 0.072 8/ 3 0 ( 02 04 ave) 0.082 2005 0.084 7/ 9 0.081 6/ 26 0.081 9/ 9 0.078 7/ 30 0 ( 03 05 ave) 0.077 Hamilton County Year 1st Date 2nd Date 3rd Date 4th Date Days => 0.085 ppm 3 Year Priod Site Design Value 1995 0.111 0.098 0.097 0.096 13 Noblesville Jr. HS 1996 0.110 0.102 0.102 0.101 10 1997 0.122 7/ 12 0.099 7/ 13 0.097 7/ 25 0.095 8/ 1 8 ( 95 97 ave) 0.097 1998 0.112 9/ 13 0.102 7/ 13 0.102 9/ 12 0.100 5/ 15 16 ( 96 98 ave) 0.098 1999 0.103 5/ 29 0.101 6/ 10 0.099 9/ 1 0.096 9/ 4 18 ( 97 99 ave) 0.097 2000 0.10 6/ 9 0.099 6/ 1 0.09 6/ 8 0.090 7/ 27 4 ( 98 00 ave) 0.095 2001 0.103 6/ 13 0.096 8/ 1 0.089 8/ 6 0.088 6/ 19 4 ( 99 01 ave) 0.091 2002 0.108 6/ 21 0.107 6/ 22 0.104 9/ 7 0.101 8/ 10 17 ( 00 02 ave) 0.093 2003 0.108 6/ 25 0.102 6/ 18 0.101 6/ 23 0.101 6/ 24 5 ( 01 03 ave) 0.096 2004 0.079 7/ 2 0.077 9/ 22 0.076 4/ 16 0.075 7/ 1 0 ( 02 04 ave) 0.092 2005 0.098 6/ 27 0.092 6/ 24 0.090 6/ 23 0.087 6/ 26 4 ( 03 05 ave) 0.087 3 Year Average of 4th High 3 Year Average of 4th High 3 Year Average of 4th High 6 1/ 5/ 2006 INDIANA OZONE  DAILY MAXIMUM 8 HOUR AVERAGES 1995  2005 Indianapolis Metropolitan Area EIGHT HOUR OZONE AVERAGES ( PPM)

Hancock County Year 1st Date 2nd Date 3rd Date 4th Date Days => 0.085 ppm 3 Year Priod Site Design Value 1995 0.104 0.103 0.099 0.097 8 Fortville 1996 0.109 0.100 0.100 0.100 10 1997 0.101 7/ 12 0.099 8/ 1 0.091 7/ 13 0.088 7/ 17 7 ( 95 97 ave) 0.095 1998 0.108 9/ 13 0.104 9/ 12 0.095 8/ 22 0.094 5/ 29 13 ( 96 98 ave) 0.094 1999 0.099 5/ 29 0.098 6/ 10 0.096 6/ 22 0.094 9/ 4 15 ( 97 99 ave) 0.092 2000 0.098 6/ 9 0.097 6/ 1 0.087 7/ 27 0.086 6/ 8 4 ( 98 00 ave) 0.091 2001 0.102 6/ 13 0.102 8/ 8 0.091 6/ 19 0.089 7/ 31 8 ( 99 01 ave) 0.089 2002 0.107 8/ 10 0.106 6/ 21 0.101 7/ 15 0.101 6/ 22 18 ( 00 02 ave) 0.092 2003 0.106 6/ 18 0.094 6/ 23 0.092 6/ 24 0.092 6/ 25 5 ( 01 03 ave) 0.094 2004 0.077 9/ 22 0.073 4/ 16 0.073 6/ 30 0.072 7/ 13 0 ( 02 04 ave) 0.088 2005 0.088 6/ 24 0.082 6/ 26 0.081 6/ 23 0.080 6/ 25 1 ( 03 05 ave) 0.081 Madison County Year 1st Date 2nd Date 3rd Date 4th Date Days => 0.085 ppm 3 Year Priod Site Design Value 1995 0.106 0.103 0.100 0.095 10 East Elementary 1996 0.113 0.100 0.100 0.098 14 1997 0.097 8/ 1 0.086 7/ 12 0.085 7/ 13 0.082 5/ 24 3 ( 95 97 ave) 0.091 1998 0.108 9/ 13 0.107 9/ 12 0.098 5/ 29 0.097 5/ 15 13 ( 96 98 ave) 0.092 1999 0.099 6/ 10 0.099 6/ 22 0.098 5/ 29 0.093 9/ 4 15 ( 97 99 ave) 0.090 2000 0.091 6/ 1 0.082 7/ 27 0.081 4/ 30 0.080 6/ 9 1 ( 98 00 ave) 0.090 2001 0.102 8/ 8 0.093 6/ 13 0.093 6/ 19 0.090 6/ 18 4 ( 99 01 ave) 0.087 2002 0.109 6/ 21 0.106 7/ 8 0.104 6/ 22 0.104 7/ 15 16 ( 00 02 ave) 0.091 2003 0.101 6/ 18 0.093 6/ 25 0.092 8/ 25 0.091 4/ 16 8 ( 01 03 ave) 0.095 2004 0.077 9/ 22 0.072 4/ 16 0.072 5/ 11 0.072 7/ 1 0 ( 02 04 ave) 0.089 2005 0.090 6/ 24 0.083 6/ 26 0.078 4/ 17 0.078 4/ 18 1 ( 03 05 ave) 0.080 Delaware County Year 1st Date 2nd Date 3rd Date 4th Date Days => 0.085 ppm 3 Year Priod Site Design Value 2001 0.095 6/ 19 0.089 6/ 13 0.085 6/ 11 0.084 5/ 3 3 ( 01 ave) 0.084 Albany 2002 0.098 6/ 22 0.098 7/ 16 0.097 6/ 23 0.095 6/ 21 12 ( 01 02 ave) 0.089 2003 0.098 6/ 25 0.092 6/ 24 0.088 6/ 18 0.085 4/ 16 5 ( 01 03 ave) 0.088 2004 0.080 7/ 1 0.078 7/ 2 0.073 7/ 20 0.070 4/ 16 0 ( 02 04 ave) 0.083 2005 0.098 6/ 24 0.089 6/ 26 0.082 5/ 6 0.081 4/ 18 2 ( 03 05 ave) 0.078 3 Year Average of 4th High 3 Year Average of 4th High 3 Year Average of 4th High 7 1/ 5/ 2006 INDIANA OZONE  DAILY MAXIMUM 8 HOUR AVERAGES 1995  2005 Northwest Indiana Metropolitan Area EIGHT HOUR OZONE AVERAGES ( PPM)

Lake County Year 1st Date 2nd Date 3rd Date 4th Date Days => 0.085 ppm 3 Year Priod Site Design Value 1995 0.105 0.104 0.095 0.094 9 Gary IITRI 1996 0.103 0.101 0.096 0.094 8 1997 0.100 7/ 26 0.099 6/ 29 0.098 8/ 2 0.092 6/ 28 7 ( 95 97 ave) 0.093 1998 0.089 5/ 19 0.085 9/ 6 0.084 9/ 12 0.084 9/ 19 2 ( 96 98 ave) 0.090 1999 0.102 9/ 5 0.099 9/ 3 0.098 9/ 4 0.094 9/ 2 5 ( 97 99 ave) 0.090 2000 0.091 8/ 15 0.082 6/ 8 0.082 6/ 9 0.075 6/ 1 1 ( 98 00 ave) 0.084 2001 0.094 6/ 28 0.087 7/ 9 0.085 8/ 5 0.083 8/ 7 3 ( 99 01 ave) 0.084 2002 0.111 6/ 24 0.099 6/ 23 0.096 9/ 8 0.094 6/ 22 8 ( 00 02 ave) 0.084 2003 0.081 8/ 16 0.080 6/ 25 0.077 7/ 4 0.076 6/ 24 0 ( 01 03 ave) 0.084 2004 0.070 7/ 2 0.064 8/ 2 0.064 8/ 3 0.064 9/ 22 0 ( 02 04 ave) 0.078 2005 0.101 6/ 25 0.100 7/ 10 0.090 6/ 28 0.089 6/ 26 7 ( 03 05 ave) 0.076 Year 1st Date 2nd Date 3rd Date 4th Date Days => 0.085 ppm 3 Year Priod Site Design Value 1995 0.129 0.113 0.110 0.099 13 Hammond 1996 0.109 0.096 0.094 0.093 10 1997 0.097 7/ 12 0.095 6/ 28 0.095 6/ 29 0.094 7/ 17 9 ( 95 97 ave) 0.095 1998 0.101 9/ 6 0.089 9/ 12 0.088 7/ 13 0.085 9/ 13 5 ( 96 98 ave) 0.090 1999 0.100 9/ 3 0.100 9/ 5 0.096 9/ 4 0.095 9/ 2 8 ( 97 99 ave) 0.091 2000 0.089 6/ 8 0.089 6/ 9 0.088 9/ 1 0.086 6/ 1 4 ( 98 00 ave) 0.088 2001 0.097 6/ 13 0.094 6/ 28 0.091 6/ 26 0.090 6/ 30 8 ( 99 01 ave) 0.090 2002 0.104 6/ 22 0.103 6/ 24 0.101 6/ 9 0.101 6/ 23 18 ( 00 02 ave) 0.092 2003 0.088 6/ 25 0.088 8/ 26 0.084 6/ 24 0.081 7/ 4 2 ( 01 03 ave) 0.090 2004 0.074 9/ 4 0.069 7/ 12 0.067 6/ 6 0.067 8/ 2 0 ( 02 04 ave) 0.083 2005 0.095 6/ 25 0.090 7/ 10 0.089 6/ 26 0.087 6/ 27 5 ( 03 05 ave) 0.078 Year 1st Date 2nd Date 3rd Date 4th Date Days => 0.085 ppm 3 Year Priod Site Design Value 1998 0.106 6/ 23 0.089 5/ 14 0.088 9/ 13 0.087 9/ 11 6 ( 98 ave) 0.087 Lowell 1999 0.093 9/ 2 0.093 9/ 5 0.092 6/ 21 0.090 9/ 3 10 ( 98 99 ave) 0.088 2000 0.090 6/ 9 0.087 6/ 8 0.081 6/ 1 0.075 7/ 13 2 ( 98 00 ave) 0.084 2001 0.084 7/ 9 0.083 6/ 13 0.081 6/ 28 0.077 6/ 26 0 ( 99 01 ave) 0.080 2002 0.091 6/ 22 0.090 6/ 23 0.088 7/ 14 0.086 8/ 10 7 ( 00 02 ave) 0.079 2003 0.101 7/ 2 0.090 6/ 25 0.088 6/ 24 0.081 8/ 25 3 ( 01 03 ave) 0.081 2004 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0 ( 02 04 ave) 0.000 Site discontinue September 30, 2003 Whiting High School Year 1st Date 2nd Date 3rd Date 4th Date Days => 0.085 ppm 3 Year Priod Site Design Value 2004 0.076 9/ 12 0.068 8/ 3 0.067 9/ 23 0.064 7/ 12 0 ( 04 ave) 0.064 2005 0.103 7/ 10 0.092 6/ 27 0.089 8/ 1 0.088 6/ 28 4 ( 03 05 ave) 0.076 3 Year Average of 4th High 3 Year Average of 4th High 3 Year Average of 4th High 3 Year Average of 4th High 8 1/ 5/ 2006 INDIANA OZONE  DAILY MAXIMUM 8 HOUR AVERAGES 1995  2005 Northwest Indiana Metropolitan Area EIGHT HOUR OZONE AVERAGES ( PPM)

Porter County Year 1st Date 2nd Date 3rd Date 4th Date Days => 0.085 ppm 3 Year Priod Site Design Value 1995 0.109 0.108 0.106 0.103 17 Ogden Dunes 1996 0.121 0.110 0.104 0.096 7 1997 0.100 7/ 26 0.099 8/ 2 0.094 6/ 29 0.091 6/ 28 10 ( 95 97 ave) 0.096 1998 0.112 6/ 27 0.097 5/ 19 0.09 7/ 13 0.087 6/ 23 7 ( 96 98 ave) 0.091 1999 0.105 7/ 24 0.104 9/ 5 0.102 9/ 3 0.101 9/ 4 9 ( 97 99 ave) 0.093 2000 0.101 8/ 15 0.088 9/ 1 0.085 6/ 8 0.085 6/ 9 4 ( 98 00 ave) 0.091 2001 0.095 6/ 28 0.093 6/ 26 0.085 7/ 9 0.085 8/ 7 4 ( 99 01 ave) 0.090 2002 0.119 6/ 24 0.105 6/ 23 0.101 6/ 21 0.101 6/ 22 12 ( 00 02 ave) 0.090 2003 0.086 8/ 16 0.084 6/ 25 0.080 6/ 24 0.077 6/ 18 1 ( 01 03 ave) 0.087 2004 0.078 7/ 12 0.077 7/ 2 0.072 9/ 22 0.069 6/ 6 0 ( 02 04 ave) 0.082 2005 0.109 6/ 25 0.098 7/ 10 0.091 6/ 28 0.090 6/ 26 7 ( 03 05 ave) 0.078 Year 1st Date 2nd Date 3rd Date 4th Date Days => 0.085 ppm 3 Year Priod Site Design Value 1998 0.105 6/ 27 0.102 5/ 19 0.092 9/ 12 0.090 5/ 15 5 ( 98 ave) 0.090 Dunes National 1999 0.105 9/ 3 0.104 7/ 24 0.103 9/ 5 0.102 9/ 2 11 ( 98 99 ave) 0.096 Lake Shore 2000 0.099 8/ 15 0.084 9/ 1 0.073 8/ 31 0.071 7/ 13 1 ( 98 00 ave) 0.087 2001 0.093 6/ 28 0.090 6/ 26 0.084 7/ 9 0.082 6/ 13 2 ( 99 01 ave) 0.085 2002 0.113 6/ 24 0.104 6/ 21 0.098 6/ 23 0.097 6/ 22 11 ( 00 02 ave) 0.083 2003 0.081 6/ 22 0.081 7/ 1 0.081 8/ 16 0.079 6/ 17 0 ( 01 03 ave) 0.086 2004 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0 ( 02 04 ave) 0.000 Site discontinue September 30, 2003 Year 1st Date 2nd Date 3rd Date 4th Date Days => 0.085 ppm 3 Year Priod Site Design Value 1998 0.098 5/ 19 0.089 9/ 12 0.088 5/ 15 0.085 9/ 6 6 ( 98 ave) 0.085 Valparaiso 1999 0.097 9/ 2 0.097 9/ 5 0.094 7/ 24 0.091 5/ 29 11 ( 98 99 ave) 0.088 2000 0.092 6/ 8 0.092 6/ 9 0.091 8/ 15 0.082 6/ 1 3 ( 98 00 ave) 0.086 2001 0.079 7/ 15 0.078 6/ 13 0.078 7/ 16 0.077 6/ 29 0 ( 99 01 ave) 0.083 2002 0.110 6/ 24 0.105 7/ 15 0.101 9/ 8 0.100 6/ 21 17 ( 00 02 ave) 0.086 2003 0.090 6/ 24 0.090 6/ 25 0.082 6/ 18 0.082 7/ 2 2 ( 01 03 ave) 0.086 2004 0.084 7/ 2 0.081 7/ 1 0.077 8/ 3 0.072 4/ 16 0 ( 02 04 ave) 0.084 2005 0.086 6/ 27 0.085 7/ 10 0.083 7/ 9 0.078 6/ 29 2 ( 03 05 ave) 0.077 3 Year Average of 4th High 3 Year Average of 4th High 3 Year Average of 4th High 9 1/ 5/ 2006 INDIANA OZONE  DAILY MAXIMUM 8 HOUR AVERAGES 1995  2005 Northwest Indiana Metropolitan Area EIGHT HOUR OZONE AVERAGES ( PPM)

LaPorte County Year 1st Date 2nd Date 3rd Date 4th Date Days => 0.085 ppm 3 Year Priod Site Design Value 1995 0.131 0.120 0.118 0.114 21 Michigan City 1996 0.118 0.109 0.106 0.102 10 1997 0.112 6/ 29 0.107 7/ 26 0.098 8/ 3 0.096 7/ 17 9 ( 95 97 ave) 0.104 1998 0.109 6/ 27 0.096 5/ 19 0.095 5/ 15 0.093 7/ 14 12 ( 96 98 ave) 0.097 1999 0.108 7/ 24 0.096 9/ 3 0.088 9/ 5 0.086 5/ 30 6 ( 97 99 ave) 0.091 2000 0.103 8/ 15 0.090 6/ 8 0.089 6/ 9 0.080 9/ 1 3 ( 98 00 ave) 0.086 2001 0.098 8/ 7 0.092 6/ 26 0.090 6/ 28 0.090 6/ 29 8 ( 99 01 ave) 0.085 2002 0.116 6/ 24 0.113 6/ 23 0.107 6/ 21 0.107 7/ 3 15 ( 00 02 ave) 0.092 2003 0.090 6/ 24 0.090 6/ 25 0.082 6/ 18 0.082 6/ 22 2 ( 01 03 ave) 0.093 2004 0.076 7/ 2 0.075 8/ 2 0.071 6/ 6 0.070 9/ 12 0 ( 02 04 ave) 0.086 2005 0.097 6/ 25 0.093 7/ 10 0.091 6/ 27 0.084 8/ 2 3 ( 03 05 ave) 0.078 Year 1st Date 2nd Date 3rd Date 4th Date Days => 0.085 ppm 3 Year Priod Site Design Value 1997 0.136 7/ 26 0.105 7/ 1 0.097 7/ 17 0.095 6/ 29 8 ( 97 ave) 0.095 LaPorte 1998 0.096 6/ 26 0.088 6/ 27 0.085 5/ 19 0.084 9/ 12 3 ( 97 98 ave) 0.089 1999 0.106 7/ 24 0.087 9/ 4 0.086 5/ 30 0.086 6/ 11 5 ( 97 99 ave) 0.088 2000 0.088 8/ 15 0.087 6/ 9 0.085 6/ 8 0.074 8/ 30 3 ( 98 00 ave) 0.081 2001 0.084 6/ 19 0.082 6/ 13 0.079 6/ 11 0.079 6/ 29 0 ( 99 01 ave) 0.079 2002 0.116 6/ 24 0.111 7/ 16 0.101 6/ 22 0.100 6/ 23 15 ( 00 02 ave) 0.084 2003 0.091 6/ 25 0.086 6/ 18 0.085 6/ 24 0.084 8/ 25 3 ( 01 03 ave) 0.087 2004 0.074 7/ 2 0.071 7/ 1 0.069 8/ 3 0.068 9/ 22 0 ( 02 04 ave) 0.084 2005 0.093 7/ 10 0.092 7/ 9 0.090 6/ 25 0.089 6/ 27 4 ( 03 05 ave) 0.080 3 Year Average of 4th High 3 Year Average of 4th High 10 1/ 5/ 2006 INDIANA OZONE  DAILY MAXIMUM 8 HOUR AVERAGES 1995  2005 South Bend/ Elkhart Metropolitan Area EIGHT HOUR OZONE AVERAGES ( PPM)

St. Joseph County Year 1st Date 2nd Date 3rd Date 4th Date Days => 0.085 ppm 3 Year Priod Site Design Value 1995 0.102 0.101 0.099 0.092 9 Granger 1996 0.098 0.093 0.093 0.091 8 1997 0.108 7/ 26 0.101 7/ 17 0.093 6/ 29 0.091 5/ 24 7 ( 95 97 ave) 0.091 1998 0.100 9/ 6 0.097 5/ 15 0.096 5/ 19 0.095 5/ 14 9 ( 96 98 ave) 0.092 1999 0.091 9/ 2 0.089 9/ 4 0.088 6/ 11 0.087 5/ 30 8 ( 97 99 ave) 0.091 2000 0.092 8/ 15 0.084 6/ 8 0.084 6/ 9 0.078 8/ 30 1 ( 98 00 ave) 0.086 2001 0.092 6/ 19 0.090 6/ 13 0.089 7/ 9 0.089 8/ 7 6 ( 99 01 ave) 0.084 2002 0.120 6/ 24 0.108 7/ 16 0.106 7/ 3 0.104 6/ 23 22 ( 00 02 ave) 0.090 2003 0.097 6/ 25 0.095 6/ 18 0.092 6/ 22 0.086 7/ 1 5 ( 01 03 ave) 0.093 2004 0.091 7/ 2 0.084 7/ 1 0.081 9/ 22 0.076 8/ 3 1 ( 02 04 ave) 0.088 2005 0.096 7/ 10 0.088 7/ 11 0.087 6/ 24 0.086 6/ 27 6 ( 03 05 ave) 0.082 Year 1st Date 2nd Date 3rd Date 4th Date Days => 0.085 ppm 3 Year Priod Site Design Value 1995 0.102 0.095 0.094 0.090 5 South Bend 1996 0.092 0.092 0.088 0.087 6 1997 0.105 7/ 26 0.098 7/ 17 0.091 5/ 24 0.091 6/ 29 6 ( 95 97 ave) 0.089 1998 0.098 6/ 26 0.097 5/ 15 0.097 5/ 19 0.088 5/ 14 7 ( 96 98 ave) 0.088 1999 0.095 7/ 24 0.095 9/ 2 0.094 6/ 22 0.090 6/ 10 9 ( 97 99 ave) 0.089 2000 0.089 8/ 15 0.086 6/ 8 0.085 6/ 9 0.081 8/ 30 3 ( 98 00 ave) 0.086 2001 0.094 6/ 19 0.092 6/ 13 0.090 8/ 7 0.082 8/ 8 3 ( 99 01 ave) 0.084 2002 0.106 6/ 24 0.101 6/ 22 0.101 7/ 3 0.100 6/ 23 16 ( 00 02 ave) 0.087 2003 0.095 6/ 25 0.084 8/ 25 0.083 6/ 24 0.082 6/ 22 1 ( 01 03 ave) 0.088 2004 0.087 7/ 2 0.080 7/ 1 0.072 6/ 7 0.072 8/ 3 1 ( 02 04 ave) 0.084 2005 0.092 7/ 10 0.087 6/ 25 0.084 6/ 27 0.084 7/ 9 2 ( 03 05 ave) 0.079 Year 1st Date 2nd Date 3rd Date 4th Date Days => 0.085 ppm 3 Year Priod Site Design Value 1995 0.106 0.102 0.101 0.100 8 Potato Creek 1996 0.099 0.096 0.094 0.091 7 1997 0.094 7/ 17 0.088 5/ 24 0.086 6/ 28 0.084 6/ 29 3 ( 95 97 ave) 0.091 1998 0.103 5/ 19 0.102 5/ 15 0.101 6/ 26 0.090 5/ 14 5 ( 96 98 ave) 0.088 1999 0.093 6/ 22 0.090 9/ 2 0.089 7/ 24 0.087 6/ 10 10 ( 97 99 ave) 0.087 2000 0.088 6/ 9 0.084 6/ 8 0.080 8/ 15 0.079 6/ 1 1 ( 98 00 ave) 0.085 2001 0.090 6/ 19 0.088 6/ 13 0.080 7/ 9 0.078 6/ 18 2 ( 99 01 ave) 0.081 2002 0.104 7/ 16 0.096 6/ 24 0.095 9/ 7 0.092 7/ 15 14 ( 00 02 ave) 0.083 2003 0.094 6/ 25 0.082 6/ 23 0.082 6/ 24 0.081 6/ 18 1 ( 01 03 ave) 0.083 2004 0.079 7/ 2 0.076 7/ 1 0.073 7/ 21 0.073 8/ 3 0 ( 02 04 ave) 0.082 2005 0.081 7/ 10 0.080 7/ 9 0.079 7/ 11 0.078 4/ 18 0 ( 03 05 ave) 0.077 3 Year Average of 4th High 3 Year Average of 4th High 3 Year Average of 4th High 11 1/ 5/ 2006 INDIANA OZONE  DAILY MAXIMUM 8 HOUR AVERAGES 1995  2005 South Bend/ Elkhart Metropolitan Area EIGHT HOUR OZONE AVERAGES ( PPM)

Elkhart County Year 1st Date 2nd Date 3rd Date 4th Date Days => 0.085 ppm 3 Year Priod Site Design Value 1995 0.099 0.097 0.096 0.090 6 Bristol 1996 0.104 0.096 0.095 0.091 8 Treatment Plant 1997 0.098 7/ 26 0.094 7/ 17 0.089 5/ 24 0.089 6/ 29 5 ( 95 97 ave) 0.090 1998 0.101 6/ 26 0.089 9/ 12 0.083 6/ 27 0.082 5/ 14 2 ( 96 98 ave) 0.087 1999 0.082 9/ 2 0.080 9/ 4 0.078 6/ 22 0.077 5/ 30 0 ( 97 99 ave) 0.082 2000 0.078 6/ 9 0.076 6/ 8 0.072 6/ 1 0.065 7/ 27 0 ( 98 00 ave) 0.074 2001 0.063 5/ 10 0.060 5/ 19 0.056 9/ 3 0.055 4/ 8 0 ( 99 01 ave) 0.065 Site moved to new location at beginning of 2002 Year 1st Date 2nd Date 3rd Date 4th Date Days => 0.085 ppm 3 Year Priod Site Design Value 2002 0.111 6/ 24 0.103 6/ 22 0.102 6/ 23 0.099 7/ 7 18 ( 02 ave) 0.099 Bristol 2003 0.093 6/ 25 0.091 6/ 18 0.088 6/ 22 0.087 6/ 24 4 ( 02 03 ave) 0.093 Bristol Elem 2004 0.080 7/ 2 0.079 9/ 22 0.078 8/ 3 0.077 7/ 1 0 ( 02 04 ave) 0.087 2005 0.094 7/ 10 0.089 6/ 27 0.088 7/ 11 0.086 6/ 25 5 ( 03 05 ave) 0.083 Cass County, MI Year 1st Date 2nd Date 3rd Date 4th Date Days => 0.085 ppm 3 Year Priod Site Design Value 1995 0.111 0.101 0.101 0.099 16 Cassopolis 1996 0.105 0.099 0.096 0.095 12 1997 0.101 7/ 17 0.094 6/ 29 0.090 5/ 24 0.090 8/ 1 7 ( 95 97 ave) 0.094 1998 0.102 5/ 19 0.098 5/ 15 0.094 7/ 13 0.091 9/ 13 7 ( 96 98 ave) 0.092 1999 0.106 9/ 2 0.100 6/ 22 0.096 9/ 3 0.095 9/ 4 14 ( 97 99 ave) 0.092 2000 0.092 8/ 15 0.09 6/ 8 0.089 6/ 9 0.079 7/ 27 3 ( 98 00 ave) 0.088 2001 0.091 8/ 8 0.090 7/ 9 0.089 8/ 7 0.088 6/ 28 7 ( 99 01 ave) 0.087 2002 0.116 6/ 24 0.106 6/ 22 0.103 6/ 23 0.103 9/ 7 24 ( 00 02 ave) 0.090 2003 0.101 6/ 25 0.091 6/ 18 0.090 6/ 22 0.089 6/ 23 5 ( 01 03 ave) 0.093 2004 0.083 7/ 2 0.083 9/ 22 0.078 7/ 1 0.077 8/ 3 0 ( 02 04 ave) 0.089 Site discontinue September 30, 2004 3 Year Average of 4th High 3 Year Average of 4th High 3 Year Average of 4th High 12 1/ 5/ 2006 INDIANA OZONE  DAILY MAXIMUM 8 HOUR AVERAGES 1995  2005 Evansville Metropolitan Area EIGHT HOUR OZONE AVERAGES ( PPM)

Posey County Year 1st Date 2nd Date 3rd Date 4th Date Days => 0.085 ppm 3 Year Priod Site Design Value 1996 0.061 0.059 0.057 0.054 0 St Phillips 1997 0.096 7/ 12 0.090 6/ 23 0.089 7/ 18 0.087 6/ 27 4 ( 96 97 ave) 0.070 1998 0.111 9/ 13 0.096 8/ 17 0.095 9/ 12 0.092 5/ 14 11 ( 96 98 ave) 0.077 1999 0.105 9/ 4 0.104 9/ 2 0.098 9/ 3 0.096 9/ 5 15 ( 97 99 ave) 0.091 2000 0.093 8/ 29 0.086 7/ 9 0.086 7/ 27 0.085 6/ 8 5 ( 98 00 ave) 0.091 2001 0.080 6/ 18 0.080 6/ 19 0.079 5/ 10 0.079 6/ 12 0 ( 99 01 ave) 0.086 2002 0.106 8/ 3 0.099 8/ 9 0.098 9/ 8 0.097 6/ 20 13 ( 00 02 ave) 0.087 2003 0.092 6/ 24 0.082 6/ 23 0.080 6/ 18 0.077 6/ 29 1 ( 01 03 ave) 0.084 2004 0.077 9/ 23 0.073 4/ 16 0.073 6/ 30 0.071 8/ 18 0 ( 02 04 ave) 0.081 2005 0.085 8/ 1 0.080 6/ 23 0.080 7/ 10 0.077 7/ 9 1 ( 03 05 ave) 0.075 Vanderburgh County Year 1st Date 2nd Date 3rd Date 4th Date Days => 0.085 ppm 3 Year Priod Site Design Value 1995 0.101 0.096 0.095 0.094 18 Evansville  Mill Rd. 1996 0.100 0.097 0.092 0.090 8 1997 0.105 7/ 12 0.101 7/ 17 0.094 7/ 25 0.093 6/ 23 6 ( 95 97 ave) 0.092 1998 0.111 9/ 13 0.102 9/ 12 0.099 5/ 14 0.092 5/ 18 8 ( 96 98 ave) 0.091 1999 0.101 9/ 5 0.100 9/ 4 0.098 8/ 12 0.098 9/ 2 18 ( 97 99 ave) 0.094 2000 0.085 8/ 29 0.083 7/ 9 0.083 7/ 27 0.081 8/ 17 1 ( 98 00 ave) 0.090 2001 0.077 6/ 18 0.074 7/ 21 0.073 6/ 12 0.073 7/ 16 0 ( 99 01 ave) 0.084 2002 0.105 8/ 13 0.102 7/ 8 0.096 8/ 9 0.095 7/ 15 16 ( 00 02 ave) 0.083 2003 0.089 6/ 24 0.086 8/ 27 0.082 6/ 29 0.081 6/ 23 2 ( 01 03 ave) 0.083 2004 0.078 9/ 23 0.074 6/ 30 0.073 4/ 16 0.072 8/ 18 0 ( 02 04 ave) 0.082 2005 0.090 6/ 23 0.081 6/ 22 0.081 8/ 1 0.080 8/ 9 1 ( 03 05 ave) 0.077 Year 1st Date 2nd Date 3rd Date 4th Date Days => 0.085 ppm 3 Year Priod Site Design Value Scott School 1995 0.099 0.097 0.096 0.096 20 1996 0.103 0.098 0.095 0.094 12 1997 0.105 7/ 12 0.102 7/ 17 0.093 7/ 18 0.089 7/ 7 8 ( 95 97 ave) 0.093 1998 0.107 9/ 13 0.099 5/ 14 0.098 8/ 17 0.094 9/ 12 10 ( 96 98 ave) 0.092 1999 0.098 6/ 21 0.095 9/ 4 0.094 9/ 5 0.091 9/ 2 9 ( 97 99 ave) 0.091 2000 0.077 6/ 1 0.076 7/ 27 0.075 6/ 4 0.075 7/ 9 0 ( 98 00 ave) 0.086 2001 0.079 6/ 12 0.076 6/ 18 0.073 5/ 10 0.072 5/ 4 0 ( 99 01 ave) 0.079 2002 0.097 7/ 8 0.095 8/ 3 0.089 7/ 15 0.086 6/ 21 5 ( 00 02 ave) 0.077 2003 0.085 6/ 24 0.081 6/ 23 0.075 6/ 29 0.075 7/ 17 1 ( 01 03 ave) 0.077 2004 0.065 4/ 16 0.061 4/ 29 0.058 4/ 17 0.058 8/ 18 0 ( 02 04 ave) 0.073 2005 0.058 7/ 11 0.057 6/ 23 0.057 7/ 10 0.056 5/ 7 0 ( 03 05 ave) 0.063 3 Year Average of 4th High 3 Year Average of 4th High 3 Year Average of 4th High * Site started 7 1 96 13 1/ 5/ 2006 INDIANA OZONE  DAILY MAXIMUM 8 HOUR AVERAGES 1995  2005 Evansville Metropolitan Area EIGHT HOUR OZONE AVERAGES ( PPM)

Warrick County Year 1st Date 2nd Date 3rd Date 4th Date Days => 0.085 ppm 3 Year Priod Site Design Value 1995 0.104 0.089 0.088 0.087 7 Alcoa 1996 0.102 0.098 0.097 0.093 14 1997 0.095 8/ 1 0.094 7/ 18 0.091 7/ 12 0.091 8/ 2 7 ( 95 97 ave) 0.090 1998 0.119 9/ 13 0.113 9/ 12 0.099 5/ 14 0.096 5/ 18 10 ( 96 98 ave) 0.093 1999 0.101 9/ 5 0.098 9/ 4 0.096 6/ 22 0.095 8/ 12 5 ( 97 99 ave) 0.094 2000 0.081 7/ 26 0.080 7/ 9 0.077 7/ 27 0.077 8/ 15 0 ( 98 00 ave) 0.089 2001 0.087 6/ 12 0.082 6/ 18 0.081 6/ 19 0.081 9/ 13 1 ( 99 01 ave) 0.084 2002 0.113 7/ 8 0.097 8/ 9 0.094 6/ 21 0.094 9/ 6 17 ( 00 02 ave) 0.084 2003 0.101 6/ 24 0.090 7/ 17 0.082 6/ 7 0.082 8/ 27 2 ( 01 03 ave) 0.085 2004 0.075 8/ 18 0.074 4/ 29 0.074 6/ 30 0.074 8/ 3 0 ( 02 04 ave) 0.083 Site discontinue September 30, 2004 Year 1st Date 2nd Date 3rd Date 4th Date Days => 0.085 ppm 3 Year Priod Site Design Value 1995 0.106 0.098 0.090 0.090 9 Boonville HS 1996 0.094 0.093 0.090 0.090 10 1997 0.109 7/ 17 0.097 7/ 12 0.097 7/ 18 0.095 8/ 2 9 ( 95 97 ave) 0.091 1998 0.114 9/ 13 0.105 9/ 12 0.100 8/ 22 0.091 5/ 13 9 ( 96 98 ave) 0.092 1999 0.092 6/ 21 0.091 9/ 5 0.088 6/ 22 0.087 9/ 2 5 ( 97 99 ave) 0.091 2000 0.078 6/ 1 0.075 7/ 27 0.074 6/ 9 0.073 6/ 8 0 ( 98 00 ave) 0.083 2001 0.091 6/ 12 0.081 6/ 19 0.079 6/ 18 0.078 9/ 13 1 ( 99 01 ave) 0.079 2002 0.107 7/ 8 0.093 9/ 6 0.092 6/ 21 0.091 7/ 16 13 ( 00 02 ave) 0.080 2003 0.087 6/ 24 0.087 8/ 27 0.083 7/ 17 0.076 6/ 7 2 ( 01 03 ave) 0.081 2004 0.084 8/ 3 0.076 6/ 30 0.075 8/ 18 0.073 4/ 29 0 ( 02 04 ave) 0.080 2005 0.096 6/ 25 0.085 6/ 29 0.081 8/ 4 0.080 6/ 22 2 ( 03 05 ave) 0.076 Year 1st Date 2nd Date 3rd Date 4th Date Days => 0.085 ppm 3 Year Priod Site Design Value Dayville 2005 0.083 6/ 25 0.078 6/ 22 0.077 5/ 6 0.077 8/ 5 0 ( 02 04 ave) 0.077 Year 1st Date 2nd Date 3rd Date 4th Date Days => 0.085 ppm 3 Year Priod Site Design Value 1995 0.108 0.107 0.096 0.093 10 Tecumseh HS 1996 0.103 0.102 0.095 0.094 8 1997 0.108 7/ 17 0.097 7/ 18 0.095 8/ 1 0.094 7/ 12 10 ( 95 97 ave) 0.093 1998 0.109 9/ 13 0.098 9/ 12 0.095 8/ 17 0.093 8/ 21 9 ( 96 98 ave) 0.093 1999 0.098 6/ 21 0.096 9/ 5 0.094 9/ 2 0.092 6/ 22 11 ( 97 99 ave) 0.093 2000 0.080 6/ 1 0.079 6/ 8 0.078 7/ 27 0.077 6/ 9 0 ( 98 00 ave) 0.087 2001 0.087 6/ 12 0.077 6/ 18 0.076 9/ 13 0.075 6/ 10 1 ( 99 01 ave) 0.081 2002 0.094 9/ 6 0.091 6/ 21 0.091 7/ 15 0.090 7/ 16 12 ( 00 02 ave) 0.080 2003 0.089 6/ 24 0.086 8/ 27 0.082 7/ 17 0.078 6/ 29 2 ( 01 03 ave) 0.081 2004 0.070 4/ 16 0.066 4/ 29 0.066 8/ 18 0.066 9/ 23 0 ( 02 04 ave) 0.078 2005 0.082 6/ 25 0.078 8/ 9 0.077 6/ 29 0.076 7/ 23 0 ( 03 05 ave) 0.073 3 Year Average of 4th High 3 Year Average of 4th High 3 Year Average of 4th High 3 Year Average of 4th High 14 1/ 5/ 2006 INDIANA OZONE  DAILY MAXIMUM 8 HOUR AVERAGES 1995  2005 Terre Haute Metropolitan Area EIGHT HOUR OZONE AVERAGES ( PPM)

Vigo County Year 1st Date 2nd Date 3rd Date 4th Date Days => 0.085 ppm 3 Year Priod Site Design Value 1995 0.091 0.087 0.087 0.085 4 1996 0.105 0.101 0.100 0.098 20 Terre Haute 1997 0.099 7/ 12 0.087 7/ 17 0.087 7/ 20 0.083 6/ 28 3 ( 95 97 ave) 0.088 1998 0.093 9/ 13 0.091 9/ 12 0.088 8/ 21 0.084 5/ 14 3 ( 96 98 ave) 0.088 1999 0.092 9/ 5 0.088 9/ 2 0.086 6/ 22 0.082 5/ 29 3 ( 97 99 ave) 0.083 2000 0.087 6/ 9 0.083 6/ 8 0.075 4/ 30 0.075 7/ 27 1 ( 98 00 ave) 0.080 2001 0.090 6/ 18 0.085 6/ 13 0.083 6/ 19 0.082 5/ 5 2 ( 99 01 ave) 0.079 2002 0.091 6/ 22 0.085 6/ 23 0.083 7/ 16 0.082 8/ 10 2 ( 00 02 ave) 0.079 2003 0.076 6/ 24 0.069 6/ 25 0.067 6/ 18 0.066 6/ 17 0 ( 01 03 ave) 0.076 2004 0.061 7/ 1 0.060 6/ 6 0.058 9/ 23 0.057 6/ 30 0 ( 02 04 ave) 0.068 2005 0.069 6/ 26 0.068 6/ 27 0.066 6/ 24 0.064 8/ 1 0 ( 03 05 ave) 0.062 Year 1st Date 2nd Date 3rd Date 4th Date Days => 0.085 ppm 3 Year Priod Site Design Value 2001 0.090 6/ 18 0.085 6/ 13 0.084 6/ 19 0.083 7/ 31 2 ( 01 ave) 0.083 Sandcut 2002 0.104 6/ 21 0.104 6/ 22 0.101 8/ 10 0.099 9/ 7 8 ( 01 02 ave) 0.091 2003 0.090 6/ 24 0.088 6/ 25 0.081 6/ 23 0.080 6/ 18 2 ( 01 03 ave) 0.087 2004 0.078 7/ 1 0.073 4/ 16 0.072 4/ 29 0.072 9/ 22 0 ( 02 04 ave) 0.083 2005 0.085 6/ 26 0.081 6/ 24 0.078 6/ 27 0.076 6/ 30 1 ( 03 05 ave) 0.076 Clark County, IL Year 1st Date 2nd Date 3rd Date 4th Date Days => 0.085 ppm 3 Year Priod Site Design Value 2001 0.081 5/ 5 0.078 5/ 16 0.075 6/ 19 0.074 5/ 9 0 ( 01 ave) 0.074 2002 0.093 6/ 22 0.091 6/ 21 0.089 8/ 10 0.086 7/ 16 6 ( 01 02 ave) 0.080 West Union 2003 0.079 6/ 24 0.077 6/ 18 0.068 6/ 23 0.067 6/ 17 0 ( 01 03 ave) 0.075 2004 0.064 6/ 6 0.063 4/ 29 0.063 9/ 23 0.062 6/ 30 0 ( 02 04 ave) 0.071 2005 0.074 6/ 26 0.074 8/ 2 0.073 9/ 11 0.071 6/ 23 0 ( 03 05 ave) 0.066 3 Year Average of 4th High 3 Year Average of 4th High 3 Year Average of 4th High 15 1/ 5/ 2006 INDIANA OZONE  DAILY MAXIMUM 8 HOUR AVERAGES 1995  2005 EIGHT HOUR OZONE AVERAGES ( PPM)

Jackson County Year 1st Date 2nd Date 3rd Date 4th Date Days => 0.085 ppm 3 Year Priod Site Design Value 2000 0.091 6/ 1 0.091 6/ 9 0.09 6/ 8 0.082 9/ 19 3 ( 00 ave) 0.082 2001 0.087 6/ 18 0.085 5/ 5 0.084 6/ 13 0.084 8/ 6 2 ( 00 01 ave) 0.083 Brownstown 2002 0.094 6/ 21 0.093 6/ 22 0.091 8/ 10 0.090 8/ 3 10 ( 00 02 ave) 0.085 2003 0.084 8/ 25 0.082 6/ 24 0.082 6/ 25 0.082 6/ 18 0 ( 01 03 ave) 0.085 2004 0.076 8/ 19 0.070 9/ 22 0.069 4/ 29 0.068 4/ 16 0 ( 02 04 ave) 0.080 2005 0.085 7/ 10 0.082 6/ 26 0.081 7/ 9 0.077 4/ 19 1 ( 03 05 ave) 0.075 Green County Year 1st Date 2nd Date 3rd Date 4th Date Days => 0.085 ppm 3 Year Priod Site Design Value 2000 0.095 6/ 1 0.093 6/ 9 0.091 6/ 8 0.090 5/ 31 4 ( 00 ave) 0.090 2001 0.092 6/ 13 0.091 6/ 18 0.087 6/ 19 0.085 5/ 4 5 ( 00 01 ave) 0.087 Plummer 2002 0.097 8/ 10 0.095 7/ 8 0.095 9/ 8 0.093 7/ 15 14 ( 00 02 ave) 0.089 2003 0.097 6/ 18 0.092 6/ 24 0.092 6/ 25 0.088 8/ 25 4 ( 01 03 ave) 0.088 2004 0.076 4/ 16 0.075 4/ 29 0.075 9/ 23 0.073 8/ 19 0 ( 02 04 ave) 0.084 2005 0.084 6/ 25 0.082 6/ 24 0.079 6/ 29 0.079 7/ 10 0 ( 03 05 ave) 0.080 Carroll County Year 1st Date 2nd Date 3rd Date 4th Date Days => 0.085 ppm 3 Year Priod Site Design Value 2001 0.087 6/ 13 0.081 6/ 19 0.081 9/ 6 0.079 5/ 6 1 ( 01 ave) 0.079 Flora 2002 0.104 6/ 21 0.102 6/ 22 0.097 9/ 7 0.096 6/ 23 12 ( 01 02 ave) 0.087 2003 0.088 6/ 25 0.085 6/ 18 0.080 6/ 24 0.079 8/ 20 2 ( 01 03 ave) 0.084 2004 0.075 7/ 2 0.075 9/ 22 0.071 6/ 5 0.071 7/ 1 0 ( 02 04 ave) 0.082 2005 0.076 4/ 18 0.076 6/ 26 0.076 6/ 27 0.075 9/ 12 0 ( 03 05 ave) 0.075 Perry County Year 1st Date 2nd Date 3rd Date 4th Date Days => 0.085 ppm 3 Year Priod Site Design Value 2004 0.081 8/ 19 0.080 4/ 16 0.080 5/ 7 0.078 4/ 29 0 ( 04 ave) 0.078 Leopold 2005 0.088 7/ 10 0.086 6/ 30 0.086 8/ 1 0.086 8/ 11 4 ( 03 05 ave) 0.082 3 Year Average of 4th High 3 Year Average of 4th High 3 Year Average of 4th High Other Monitors 3 Year Average of 4th High 16 1/ 5/ 2006 INDIANA OZONE  DAILY MAXIMUM 8 HOUR AVERAGES 1995  2005 Industrial Monitors EIGHT HOUR OZONE AVERAGES ( PPM)

Lawrence County Year 1st Date 2nd Date 3rd Date 4th Date Days => 0.085 ppm 3 Year Priod Site Design Value Paoli 97 0.094 6/ 24 0.094 7/ 13 0.091 7/ 18 0.087 7/ 26 4 ( 97 ave) 0.087 Perry County Year 1st Date 2nd Date 3rd Date 4th Date Days => 0.085 ppm 3 Year Priod Site Design Value 1998 0.106 9/ 13 0.104 9/ 5 0.104 9/ 12 0.097 8/ 22 16 ( 98 ave) 0.097 1999 0.105 9/ 3 0.101 6/ 9 0.099 9/ 4 0.095 8/ 12 18 ( 98 99 ave) 0.096 AK Steel 2000 0.094 6/ 9 0.093 7/ 27 0.092 8/ 30 0.091 6/ 1 6 ( 98 00 ave) 0.094 2001 0.098 6/ 12 0.086 6/ 11 0.086 6/ 19 0.086 8/ 1 5 ( 99 01 ave) 0.090 Gibson County Year 1st Date 2nd Date 3rd Date 4th Date Days => 0.085 ppm 3 Year Priod Site Design Value 1999 0.09 6/ 11 0.089 6/ 9 0.081 6/ 10 0.080 6/ 22 2 ( 99 ave) 0.080 2000 0.074 6/ 1 0.071 6/ 8 0.070 6/ 9 0.068 3/ 5 0 ( 99 00 ave) 0.074 Toyota 2001 0.074 6/ 18 0.068 6/ 12 0.067 5/ 4 0.067 5/ 10 0 ( 99 01 ave) 0.071 2002 0.083 7/ 8 0.081 6/ 20 0.080 6/ 19 0.078 6/ 21 0 ( 00 02 ave) 0.071 2003 0.090 6/ 24 0.076 6/ 30 0.076 8/ 20 0.074 8/ 25 1 ( 01 03 ave) 0.073 Kosciusko County Year 1st Date 2nd Date 3rd Date 4th Date Days => 0.085 ppm 3 Year Priod Site Design Value RR Donnelley 2003 0.097 6/ 24 0.094 6/ 25 0.093 6/ 18 0.086 7/ 3 4 ( 03 ave) 0.086 3 Year Average of 4th High 3 Year Average of 4th High 3 Year Average of 4th High 3 Year Average of 4th High 17 1/ 5/ 2006 Indiana 2005 Ozone  8Hour Information Last Update: 10/ 03/ 05 Fort Wayne Metropolitan Area EIGHT HOUR OZONE AVERAGES ( PPM) The " yellow" shading represents the 2003 5 averages that are 85 or above.

Note: The " Critical Value" is the value of the 4th highest to make 03 05 ave. non attainment (. 085) 8hr. Ave.

0.091 0.087 0.087 0.086 0.092 0.083 0.084 0.077 0.077 0.076 0.102 0.076 0.082 0.082 0.080 0.078 0.103 0.076 Louisville, KY Metropolitan Area EIGHT HOUR OZONE AVERAGES ( PPM)

0.098 0.092 0.086 0.080 0.091 0.081 0.092 0.086 0.081 0.080 0.098 0.079 Indianapolis Metropolitan Area EIGHT HOUR OZONE AVERAGES ( PPM)

0.083 0.081 0.077 0.076 0.116 0.071 0.089 0.084 0.082 0.081 0.114 0.074 0.087 0.082 0.081 0.080 0.091 0.081 0.082 0.081 0.081 0.080 0.102 0.077 0.087 0.081 0.079 0.078 0.105 0.076 0.088 0.083 0.082 0.082 0.095 0.080 0.084 0.083 0.082 0.080 0.095 0.080 0.091 0.080 0.079 0.077 0.102 0.076 0.084 0.081 0.081 0.078 0.102 0.077 0.098 0.092 0.090 0.087 0.079 0.087 0.088 0.082 0.081 0.080 0.091 0.081 0.090 0.083 0.078 0.078 0.092 0.080 0.098 0.089 0.082 0.081 0.100 0.078 Terre Haute Metropolitan Area EIGHT HOUR OZONE AVERAGES ( PPM)

0.069 0.068 0.066 0.064 0.132 0.062 0.085 0.081 0.078 0.076 0.103 0.076 0.074 0.074 0.073 0.071 0.126 0.066 Hendricks Avon Boone Whitetown Shelby Fairland Johnson Trafalgar Morgan Monrovia Hamilton Noblesville Jr. High School Hancock Terre Haute 03 05 Avg Site County Leo HS Allen 3rd 2nd 1st 4th Critical Value Allen Fort Wayne Huntington Roanoke Critical Value 03 05 Avg 4th 2nd 3rd 4th Critical Value 03 05 Avg 2nd 3rd County Site 1st Marion Mann Road Clark Charlestown Floyd New Albany County Site 1st Marion Harding Street Marion Fort Benjamin Harrison Fortville Marion Naval Air Warfare Center Madison East Elementary Delaware Albany 03 05 Avg 4th Critical Value 1st 2nd 3rd County Site Clark County, IL West Union Vigo Sandcut Vigo Indiana 2005 Ozone  8Hour Information Northwest Indiana Metropolitan Area EIGHT HOUR OZONE AVERAGES ( PPM)

0.101 0.100 0.090 0.089 0.115 0.076 0.095 0.090 0.089 0.087 0.107 0.078 0.103 0.092 0.089 0.088 0.076 0.109 0.098 0.091 0.090 0.109 0.078 0.086 0.085 0.083 0.078 0.101 0.077 0.097 0.093 0.091 0.084 0.103 0.078 0.093 0.092 0.090 0.089 0.103 0.080 * 04 & 05 Information only South Bend/ Elkhart Metropolitan Area EIGHT HOUR OZONE AVERAGES ( PPM)

0.096 0.088 0.087 0.087 0.093 0.083 0.092 0.087 0.084 0.084 0.101 0.079 0.081 0.080 0.079 0.078 0.101 0.077 0.094 0.089 0.088 0.086 0.091 0.083 Evansville Metropolitan Area EIGHT HOUR OZONE AVERAGES ( PPM)

0.085 0.080 0.080 0.077 0.107 0.075 0.090 0.081 0.081 0.080 0.102 0.077 0.058 0.057 0.057 0.056 0.122 0.063 0.083 0.078 0.077 0.077 0.077*

0.096 0.085 0.081 0.080 0.106 0.076 0.082 0.078 0.077 0.076 0.111 0.073 * 05 Information only Other Monitors EIGHT HOUR OZONE AVERAGES ( PPM)

0.085 0.082 0.081 0.077 0.105 0.075 0.084 0.082 0.079 0.079 0.094 0.080 0.076 0.076 0.076 0.075 0.105 0.075 0.088 0.086 0.086 0.086 * 0.082 * 04 & 05 Information only 03 05 Avg 4th Critical Value 3rd 1st 2nd Gary IITRI Lake Whiting High School Lake County Site Lake LaPorte Michigan City Porter Valparaiso Porter Ogden Dunes Hammond 03 05 Avg 1st 2nd LaPorte LaPorte County Site Granger St. Joseph County South Bend 3rd 03 05 Avg 2nd 3rd 4th St. Phillips County Site Posey Warrick Dayville Warrick Boonville High School Vanderburgh Evansville Mill Road Vanderburgh Scott School Warrick Tecumseh High School Critical Value 03 05 Avg 4th 2nd 3rd 1st Jackson Brownstown County Site Perry Leopold Green Plummer Carroll Flora 1st Critical Value 4th St. Joseph County Potato Creek Elkhart Bristol Critical Value St. Joseph County


[Federal Register Volume 81, Number 82 (Thursday, April 28, 2016)]
[Notices]
[Pages 25396-25397]
[FR Doc No: 2016-09893]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY

[EPA-HQ-OECA-2012-0693; FRL-9945-36-OEI]

Information Collection Request Submitted to OMB for Review and
Approval; Comment Request; NESHAP for Taconite Iron Ore Processing
(Renewal)

AGENCY: Environmental Protection Agency (EPA).

ACTION: Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Environmental Protection Agency has submitted an
information collection request (ICR), ``NESHAP for Taconite Iron Ore
Processing (40 CFR part 63, subpart RRRRR) (Renewal)'' (EPA ICR No.
2050.06, OMB Control No. 2060-0538), to the Office of Management and
Budget (OMB) for review and approval in accordance with the Paperwork
Reduction Act (44 U.S.C. 3501 et seq.). This is a proposed extension of
the ICR, which is currently approved through April 30, 2016. Public
comments were previously requested via the Federal Register (80 FR
32116) on June 5, 2015 during a 60-day comment period. This notice
allows for an additional 30 days for public comments. A fuller
description of the ICR is given below, including its estimated burden
and cost to the public. An Agency may neither conduct nor sponsor, and
a person is not required to respond to, a collection of information
unless it displays a currently valid OMB control number.

DATES: Additional comments may be submitted on or before May 31, 2016.

ADDRESSES: Submit your comments, referencing Docket ID Number EPA-HQ-
OECA-2012-0693, to: (1) EPA online using www.regulations.gov (our
preferred method), or by email to<EMAIL_ADDRESS>or by mail to:
EPA Docket Center, Environmental Protection Agency, Mail Code 28221T,
1200 Pennsylvania Ave. NW., Washington, DC 20460; and (2) OMB via email
to<EMAIL_ADDRESS>Address comments to OMB Desk Officer
for EPA.
    EPA's policy is that all comments received will be included in the
public docket without change including any personal information
provided, unless the comment includes profanity, threats, information
claimed to be Confidential Business Information (CBI), or other
information whose disclosure is restricted by statute.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Patrick Yellin, Monitoring,
Assistance, and Media Programs Division, Office of Compliance, Mail
Code 2227A, Environmental Protection Agency, 1200 Pennsylvania Ave.
NW., Washington, DC 20460; telephone number:<PHONE_NUMBER>; email
address<EMAIL_ADDRESS>
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Supporting documents which explain in detail
the information that the EPA will be collecting are available in the
public docket for this ICR. The docket can be viewed online at
www.regulations.gov or in person at the EPA Docket Center, WJC West,
Room 3334, 1301 Constitution Ave. NW., Washington, DC. The telephone
number for the Docket Center is<PHONE_NUMBER>. For additional
information about EPA's public docket, visit: http://www.epa.gov/dockets.
    Abstract: Owners and operators of affected facilities are required
to comply with reporting and record keeping requirements for the
general provisions of 40 CFR part 63, subpart A, as well as for the
specific requirements at 40 CFR part 63, subpart RRRRR. This includes
submitting initial notifications, performance tests and periodic
reports and results, and maintaining records of the occurrence and
duration of any startup, shutdown, or malfunction in the operation of
an affected facility, or any period during which the monitoring system
is inoperative. These reports are used by EPA to determine compliance
with the standards.
    Form Numbers: None.
    Respondents/affected entities: Taconite iron ore processing plants.
    Respondent's obligation to respond: Mandatory (40 CFR part 63,
subpart RRRRR).
    Estimated number of respondents: 4 (total).
    Frequency of response: Initially and semiannually.
    Total estimated burden: 276 hours (per year). Burden is defined at
5 CFR 1320.3(b).
    Total estimated cost: $326,000 (per year), which includes $298,000
in either annualized capital/startup or operation & maintenance costs.
    Changes in the Estimates: There is an adjustment decrease in the
respondent labor hours and the number of responses as currently
identified in the OMB Inventory of Approved Burdens. The decrease is
due to a decline in the number of respondents. The previous ICR
estimated eight facilities; however, recent industry information
indicates that only half of these facilities are now in operation.
    There is, however, an adjustment increase in the respondent O&M
costs. There is not an actual increase in cost;

rather, the increases occurred because this ICR accounts for contractor
costs associated with Method 5 PM tests as an O&M cost, while the
previous ICR accounted for this cost as a labor cost.

Courtney Kerwin,
Acting-Director, Collection Strategies Division.
[FR Doc. 2016-09893 Filed 4-27-16; 8:45 am]
 BILLING CODE 6560-50-P


[Federal Register Volume 77, Number 120 (Thursday, June 21, 2012)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Page 37316]
[FR Doc No: 2012-15199]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY

Coast Guard

33 CFR Part 117

[USCG-2012-0509]

Drawbridge Operation Regulations; Reynolds Channel, Nassau, NY

AGENCY: Coast Guard, DHS.

ACTION: Notice of temporary deviation from regulations.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Commander, First Coast Guard District, has issued a
temporary deviation from the regulations governing the operation of the
Long Beach Bridge, mile 4.7, across Reynolds Channel, at Nassau, New
York. This temporary deviation authorizes the Long Beach Bridge to
remain in the closed position for two and a half hours to facilitate
public safety during the Town of Hempstead Annual Salute to Veterans
Fireworks Display.

DATES: This deviation is effective from 9:30 p.m. on June 30, 2012
through midnight on July 1, 2012.

ADDRESSES: Documents mentioned in this preamble as being available in
the docket are part of docket USCG-2012-0509 and are available online
at www.regulations.gov, inserting USCG-2012-0509 in the ``Keyword'' and
then clicking ``Search''. They are also available for inspection or
copying at the Docket Management Facility (M-30), U.S. Department of
Transportation, West Building Ground Floor, Room W12-140, 1200 New
Jersey Avenue SE., Washington, DC, 20590, between 9 a.m. and 5 p.m.,
Monday through Friday, except Federal holidays.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: If you have questions on this rule,
call or email Ms. Judy Leung-Yee, Project Officer, First Coast Guard
District, telephone<PHONE_NUMBER>, email<EMAIL_ADDRESS>If
you have questions on viewing the docket, call Renee V. Wright, Program
Manager, Docket Operations, telephone<PHONE_NUMBER>.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The Long Beach Bridge, across Reynolds
Channel, mile 4.7, at Nassau, New York, has a vertical clearance in the
closed position of 20 feet at mean high water and 24 feet at mean low
water. The existing drawbridge operation regulations are listed at 33
CFR 117.799(g).
    The owner of the bridge, Nassau County Department of Public Works,
requested a temporary deviation to facilitate safe traffic management
for the Town of Hempstead Annual Salute to Veterans Fireworks Display
scheduled for Saturday, June 30, 2012. If the fireworks display is
postponed due to inclement weather, the event will take place on
Sunday, July 1, 2012.
    Under this temporary deviation the Long Beach Bridge may remain in
the closed position from 9:30 p.m. through midnight on July 1, 2012. If
the fireworks display is postponed due to inclement weather, the Long
Beach Bridge may remain in the closed position from 9:30 p.m. through
midnight on July 2, 2012.
    The waterway has commercial and seasonal recreational vessels of
various sizes. The Coast Guard contacted all known commercial waterway
users regarding this deviation and no objections were received. Vessels
that can pass under the bridge without a bridge opening may do so at
all times.
    In accordance with 33 CFR 117.35(e), the bridge must return to its
regular operating schedule immediately at the end of the designated
time period. This deviation from the operating regulations is
authorized under 33 CFR 117.35.

    Dated: June 7, 2012.
Gary Kassof,
Bridge Program Manager, First Coast Guard District.
[FR Doc. 2012-15199 Filed 6-20-12; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 9110-04-P


                                 Attachment D

             Work Sheets used to Calculate Industry Labor Costs
This attachment is available as part of the electronic docket EPA-HQ-OPP-2018-0266 and is part of the ICR's Supporting Statement.

NAICS:  3250A1
Chemical Manufacturing (3251, 3252, 3253, and 3259 only)
Labor Category:
Formula
                                  Managerial
                                   Technical
                                   Clerical
Unloaded Hourly Rate1
 = W
                                    $58.18
                                    $30.26
                                    $19.92
Benefits Percentage2
Lb = B/W
                                     46.5%
                                     46.5%
                                     46.5%
Benefits per hour
B = W*Lb
                                    $27.04
                                    $14.06
                                    $9.26
Loaded Hourly Rate
Wb = W + B = W(1+Lb)
                                    $85.22
                                    $44.32
                                    $29.18
Overhead Percentage3
Lo = OH/Wb
                                      50%
                                      50%
                                      50%
Overhead per hour
OH = Wb*Lo
                                    $42.61
                                    $22.16
                                    $14.59
Fully Loaded Hourly Rate
Wf = Wb + OH
 = W + B + OH
                                   $127.82
                                    $66.48
                                    $43.76

1.  Data Source:  BLS http://www.bls.gov/oes/current/naics4_3250A1.htm     May 2017 data
     NAICS 3250A1 - Chemical Manufacturing (3251, 3252, 3253, and 3259 only)
     Standard Occupational Codes:
       Management:   11-0000, Management Occupations
       Technical:        19-0000, Life, Physical, and Social Science Occupations
       Clerical:           43-0000, Office and Administrative Support Occupations
2. Fringe benefits/wage per hour.
3. U. S. Environmental Protection Agency, EPA Air Pollution Control Cost Manual, Sixth Edition, EPA-452-02-001, January 2002, pg. 2-34.  The loading for indirect costs is within the range of 20-70% of the load labor rate (wage + benefits) suggested in EPA guidance.


[Federal Register: February 25, 2011 (Volume 76, Number 38)]
[Notices]
[Page 10582-10583]
[DOCID:fr25fe11-51]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission

[Project No. 13015-001]

Town of Edgartown; Notice of Public/Technical Meeting To Discuss
Information and Monitoring Needs for a License Application for a Pilot
Project

    a. Type of Application: Draft Pilot License Application.
    b. Project No.: 13015-001.
    c. Applicant: Town of Edgartown (Edgartown).
    d. Name of Project: Muskeget Channel Tidal Energy Project.
    e. Location: In Muskeget Channel, between the islands of Martha's
Vineyard and Nantucket, Dukes County, Massachusetts.
    f. Filed Pursuant to: 18 CFR 5.3 of the Commission's regulations.
    g. Applicant Contact: Ms. Pamela Dolby, Town Administrator, Town of
Edgartown, 70 Main Street, Edgartown, MA 02539;<PHONE_NUMBER>.
    h. FERC Contact: Michael Watts, phone:<PHONE_NUMBER>, e-mail:
<EMAIL_ADDRESS>    i. Project Description: The proposed Muskeget Channel Tidal Energy
Project would consist of: (1) 13 commercially operated OCGen\TM\
horizontal hydrokinetic cross-flow turbine generation units with a
total installed capacity of 5 megawatts, and one experimental turbine
unit that would be used to test various tidal energy technologies; (2)
a mooring and anchoring system attached to each unit consisting of four
mooring lines, an anchor, and a clump weight; (3) two alternative
submarine cable routes consisting of a either a 3.5-mile-long, or a 5-
mile-long submarine cable with two 13.8-kilovolt (kv) transmission
lines and a 4.0-kv transmission line connecting the turbine generation
units to an onshore substation located either in the Chappaquiddick or
Katama sections of Edgartown; (4) two alternative onshore transmission
line routes consisting of a 34.5 kv transmission line connecting either
the Chappaquiddick or Katama onshore substation to an existing
distribution line in Edgartown; and (5) appurtenant facilities. The
project would have an average annual generation of 10.95 gigawatt-
hours.
    j. Licensing Process: On February 1, 2011, Edgartown filed a Notice
of Intent and request for waivers of certain regulations of the Federal
Energy Regulatory Commission's (Commission) Integrated Licensing
Process to expedite processing of a license application for the
Muskeget Channel Tidal Energy Pilot Project. Edgartown expects to file
a final license application for a pilot project with the Commission by
February 15, 2012.
    k. Notice Purpose: The purpose of this notice is to inform you of
the opportunity to participate in the upcoming joint public/technical
meeting with Massachusetts Environmental Policy Act (MEPA) Office,
Commission staff, and Edgartown.\1\ The purpose of the meeting is to
discuss information and monitoring needs for the final license
application and to provide a public consultation session for the
purposes of MEPA review and scoping of the Environmental Impact Report
(EIR). All interested individuals, organizations, and agencies are
invited to attend the meeting. The time and location of the meeting is
as follows:
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \1\ In order to coordinate the State and Federal reviews of the
project, this meeting is being held in lieu of the May 1, 2011,
technical meeting listed in the Commission's notice issued on
February 8, 2011.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

Meeting Schedule and Location

Meeting

Monday, March 7, 2011, 11 a.m. (local time). Edgartown Town Hall, 70
Main Street, Edgartown, MA 02539.

    A land-based site visit to the proposed cable landfall location(s)
will take place after the meeting.
    Anyone in need of directions may contact Mr. Stephen Barrett at:
(781) 852 3125, or via e-mail at<EMAIL_ADDRESS>    To help focus discussions, Commission staff encourages participants
to review Edgartown's draft pilot license application and monitoring
plans filed with the Commission on February 1, 2011. These materials
are available for review at the Commission in the Public Reference Room
or may be viewed on the Commission's Web site at http://www.ferc.gov
using the ``eLibrary'' link. Enter the docket number P-13015-001 to
access the document. For assistance, contact FERC Online Support at
<EMAIL_ADDRESS>or toll-free at 1-866-208-3676, or for TTY,
(202) 502-8659.
    You may also register online at http://www.ferc.gov/docs-filing/
esubscription.asp to be notified via e-mail of new filings and
issuances related to this or other pending projects. For assistance,
please contact FERC Online Support.
    l. Meeting Objectives: At the technical meeting, Commission staff
will focus the discussion on the information gaps that need to be
addressed to ensure that sufficient information exists for the
Commission to make a determination on whether the proposed project
meets the criteria for a pilot project and for processing a license
application for a pilot project upon its filing with the Commission.
    m. MEPA Review: Edgartown filed an expanded Environmental
Notification Form (ENF) for the Muskeget Channel Tidal Energy Project
with the MEPA Office. Edgartown is requesting a single Environmental
Impact Report (EIR) rather than the typical two-stage draft and final
EIR. The expanded ENF was noticed in the February 9, 2011, issue of the
Environmental Monitor. http://www.env.state.ma.us/mepa/emonitor.aspx.
    Any agency or person may comment on the expanded ENF and the
proposed project, including: feasible alternatives, potential
environmental impacts, potential mitigation measures, and what
additional information and analysis to require in the scope for the
EIR. A MEPA public consultation session will be held on March 7, 2011,
in conjunction with the Commission's technical meeting. Written
comments on the ENF must be sent to the MEPA office by March 17, 2011.
Please mail your comments to:

Secretary Richard K. Sullivan, Executive Office of Energy and
Environmental Affairs, Attn: MEPA Office [Aisling O' Shea], EEA No.
14696, 100 Cambridge Street, Suite 900, Boston, MA 02114.

    To send comments by e-mail or fax, or for questions regarding the
MEPA process, contact Aisling O'Shea, MEPA Analyst at: e-mail:
<EMAIL_ADDRESS>Fax:<PHONE_NUMBER> or Phone: (617) 626-
1024.
    In addition, please file a copy of your comments with the Federal
Energy Regulatory Commission. Your comments may be filed electronically
via the Internet (instructions are on the Commission's Web site at:
http://www.ferc.gov/docs-filing/efiling.asp). For assistance, please
contact FERC Online Support at<EMAIL_ADDRESS>call toll-
free at<PHONE_NUMBER>; or, for TTY, contact<PHONE_NUMBER>. Although
FERC strongly encourages electronic filing, your comments may also be
paper-filed. To paper-file, mail an original and eight copies to:
Kimberly Bose, Secretary, Federal Energy Regulatory Commission, 888
First Street, NE., Washington, DC 20426. Please put the docket number,
P-13015-001 on the first page of your response.
    n. Procedures: The meetings will be recorded by a stenographer and
will become part of the formal record of the Commission proceeding on
the project.

    Dated: February 18, 2011.
Kimberly D. Bose,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2011-4263 Filed 2-24-11; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6717-01-P