 Date: October 24, 2005 To: Raj Rao, EPA/ OAQPS/ AQPD/ IIG Cc: Project file for Work Assignment 0 4, EPA Contract EP D 05 087 From: Stephen Edgerton, EC/ R Incorporated RE: Analysis of the Proposed Minor NSR Thresholds Purpose The purpose of this memorandum is to document the analysis performed to evaluate the potential effect of the proposed minor new source review ( NSR) thresholds in the Federal Minor NSR Program in Indian Country.

Methodology To evaluate how the proposed NSR thresholds might affect new sources locating in Indian country, EC/ R examined the thresholds in the context of the existing population of sources in the United States. That is, the analysis examined the potential effect of the proposed thresholds under the assumption that the distribution of new sources locating in Indian country will mirror the distribution of existing U. S. sources.

For the analysis, we used the National Emission Inventory ( NEI), which is the most comprehensive inventory of existing U. S. stationary point sources that is available. The inventory used for the analysis was the final 1999 NEI, extrapolated forward to 2001, which was the most recent quality assured version at the time of the analysis. We obtained the NEI point source facility summary dataset directly from EPA.

For each of the criteria pollutants except lead, we determined which of the NEI sources fall below the proposed minor NSR thresholds, which are between the minor NSR and major NSR thresholds, and which are above the major NSR threshold. For each pollutant, we determined the percent of sources in each category and the percent of total emissions represented by each category. See the Results section below for the outcome of the analysis.

The minor and major NSR thresholds that were evaluated for each pollutant are presented in Attachment 1. As these tables show, for the minor NSR thresholds we evaluated the proposed thresholds and some alternative thresholds to assess the effect of varying the levels. Memorandum: Analysis of the Proposed Minor NSR Thresholds 2 The major NSR threshold for each pollutant was determined based on the attainment status and, where applicable, nonattainment classification of the area in which each source is located. Attainment status and nonattainment area classifications were obtained from a dataset provided by EPA representing the summer 2005 EPA " Green Book." This dataset gives attainment and nonattainment information for each county in the United States. In this dataset, counties that are divided between areas that are categorized differently are assigned the most restrictive of the relevant nonattainment classifications. Ozone attainment status and nonattainment classifications used in this analysis are based on the 8 hour ozone standard. In addition, PM2.5 status is based on the 1997 standard.

After consulting with the EPA work assignment manager, we made simplifying assumptions regarding the major NSR thresholds for sources in attainment areas. These sources are subject to the prevention of significant deterioration ( PSD) regulations. Specifically, we used a 250 ton per year ( tpy) threshold for sources in all source categories, rather than attempting to identify sources in the " listed" source categories which are subject to a 100 tpy threshold under PSD. In addition, we evaluated each pollutant against the 250 tpy threshold, without regard to whether a source was a major source of a different pollutant ( i. e., did not apply the lesser, " significant" emission rate if a source was major for another pollutant).

It should be noted that the point sources populating the NEI are primarily the larger sources. The NEI is compiled from State inventories, and States typically address smaller sources through their area source inventories. Thus, while the NEI contains many sources with low emissions of one or more pollutant, most are likely to be major sources of at least one pollutant. In this respect, the NEI is likely not to be fully representative of the population of minor sources that would be evaluated for minor NSR applicability.

A factor that introduces an indeterminate level of uncertainty into the analysis is the fact that the NEI provides actual annual emissions, while NSR applicability typically is determined based on potential emissions. It is likely that some sources were placed in a lower category based on actual emissions than they would have been based on their potential emissions, had they been known.

Results Attachment 2 presents a summary of the results. Table 2 1 of this attachment summarizes the results for the proposed minor NSR thresholds. For each pollutant, the table gives the total number of facilities in the NEI and the total, nationwide emissions. The column labeled " unregulated minor sources" represents the percentage of total sources that falls below the minor NSR threshold, along with the percentage of total annual emissions that those sources emit. The " minor sources" column gives the same information for sources that fall between the minor and major NSR thresholds, while the " major sources" column addresses sources that exceed the major NSR threshold. If we assume that the distribution of new sources will mirror the existing source distribution, this analysis approximates the fraction of new Memorandum: Analysis of the Proposed Minor NSR Thresholds 3 sources that will be exempt from minor NSR, subject to minor NSR, and subject to major NSR.

Table 2 1 shows that, for each pollutant, only about 1 percent ( or less) of total emissions would be exempt from review under the minor NSR program at the proposed threshold level for the program. However, anywhere from 42 percent to 76 percent of sources ( depending on the pollutant) would be below the proposed threshold and, therefore, exempt from preconstruction review.

Tables 2 2 and 2 3 of Attachment 2 summarize the results for two alternative cases. In Case 1, we examined the effect of increasing the minor NSR threshold for volatile organic compounds ( VOCs). In Case 2, we evaluated the effect of increasing the minor NSR thresholds for all the pollutants. These tables show that increasing the minor NSR thresholds generally has a small effect on the percentage of total emissions and the percentage of sources that would be exempt from minor NSR review.

Attachment 3 presents the full results of the analysis. These tables show the distribution of sources by attainment status and by nonattainment classification, where applicable. 1 1 ATTACHMENT 1 Table 1 1. Proposed Minor NSR Thresholds and Major NSR Thresholds Attainment Status Proposed Minor NSR Threshold ( tpy) Major NSR Threshold ( tpy)

Carbon monoxide ( CO)

Attainment Nonattainment Serious Moderate 10 5 5 250 50 100 Nitrogen dioxide ( NO2)

Attainment ( no nonattainment) 10 250 Sulfur dioxide ( SO2)

Attainment Nonattainment 10 5 250 100 Particulate matter < 10 µ m ( PM10)

Attainment Nonattainment Serious Moderate 5 1 1 250 70 100 Particulate matter < 2.5 µ m ( PM2.5) ( attainment status based on 1997 PM2.5 NAAQS) Attainment Nonattainment 3 0.6 250 100 Ozone ( attainment status based on 8 hour ozone NAAQS)

Nitrogen oxides ( NOx) Attainment Nonattainment Severe Serious Moderate Marginal 10 5 5 5 5 250 25 50 100 100 Volatile organic compounds ( VOC) Attainment Nonattainment Severe Serious Moderate Marginal 5 2 2 2 2 250 25 50 100 100 1 2 Table 1 2. Case 1: Alternative Minor NSR Thresholds for VOC ( Major NSR Thresholds Unchanged)

Attainment Status Proposed Minor NSR Threshold ( tpy) Major NSR Threshold ( tpy)

Ozone ( attainment status based on 8 hour ozone NAAQS)

Volatile organic compounds ( VOC) Attainment Nonattainment Severe Serious Moderate Marginal 10 5 5 5 5 250 25 50 100 100 1 3 Table 1 3. Case 2: Alternative Minor NSR Thresholds for All Pollutants ( Major NSR Thresholds Unchanged)

Attainment Status Proposed Minor NSR Threshold ( tpy) Major NSR Threshold ( tpy)

Carbon monoxide ( CO)

Attainment Nonattainment Serious Moderate 20 10 10 250 50 100 Nitrogen dioxide ( NO2)

Attainment ( no nonattainment) 20 250 Sulfur dioxide ( SO2)

Attainment Nonattainment 20 10 250 100 Particulate matter < 10 µ m ( PM10)

Attainment Nonattainment Serious Moderate 5 3 3 250 70 100 Particulate matter < 2.5 µ m ( PM2.5) ( attainment status based on 1997 PM2.5 NAAQS) Attainment Nonattainment 3 1 250 100 Ozone ( attainment status based on 8 hour ozone NAAQS)

Nitrogen oxides ( NOx) Attainment Nonattainment Severe Serious Moderate Marginal 20 10 10 10 10 250 25 50 100 100 Volatile organic compounds ( VOC) Attainment Nonattainment Severe Serious Moderate Marginal 20 10 10 10 10 250 25 50 100 100 2 1 ATTACHMENT 2 Table 2 1. Summary of the Distribution of Sources and Emissions under the Proposed Minor NSR Thresholds Table 2 2. Summary of the Distribution of Sources and Emissions under Case 1 Total facilities Unregulated minor sources Minor sources Major sources Pollutant No. ( x103) TPY ( x106) % of total % of TPY % of total % of TPY % of total % of TPY CO SO2 PM10 PM2.5 Ozone  VOC Ozone   NOx NO2 28.9 21.2 33.9 33.8 43.3 30.5 30.5 4.43 13.90 1.69 1.33 1.60 7.93 7.93 65 76 65 59 42 53 59 0.8 0.1 1.3 0.8 1.1 0.4 0.6 29 16 32 38 53 36 32 11 1 22 23 41 6 7 6 8 4 3 5 11 9 88 99 76 76 58 93 92 Total facilities Unregulated minor sources Minor sources Major sources Pollutant No. ( x103) TPY ( x106) % of total % of TPY % of total % of TPY % of total % of TPY Ozone  VOC 43.3 1.60 56 2.8 39 39 5 58 2 2 Table 2 3. Summary of the Distribution of Sources and Emissions under Case 2 Total facilities Unregulated minor sources Minor sources Major sources Pollutant No. ( x103) TPY ( x106) % of total % of TPY % of total % of TPY % of total % of TPY CO SO2 PM10 PM2.5 Ozone  VOC Ozone  NOx NO2 28.9 21.2 33.9 33.8 43.3 30.5 30.5 4.43 13.90 1.69 1.33 1.60 7.93 7.93 73 81 65 61 68 63 68 1.6 0.24 1.3 0.9 6.1 0.8 1.1 21 11 31 36 27 26 23 10 1.2 33 23 36 6 7 6 8 4 3 5 11 9 88 99 76 76 58 93 92 3 1 ATTACHMENT 3 Table 3 1. CO Facilities and Emissions Under the Proposed Minor NSR Threshold Sources of Carbon Monoxide ( CO) Source Category Thresholds ( TPY) Unregulated Minors Minor Sources Major Sources Total Facilities by CO Attainment Status Potential Minor Major # fac. TPY # fac. TPY # fac. TPY # fac. TPY All Sources Emitting CO = Attainment + Nonattainament 18,678 36,900 8,421 484,357 1,816 3,909,012 28,921 4,430,727 Attainment Area Sources for CO > 10 TPY > 250 TPY 16,768 35,477 8,166 480,421 1,728 3,829,929 26,662 4,345,827 Nonattainment Area Sources for CO** = Serious + Moderate Nonattainment 1,910 1,423 255 3,936 88 79,083 2,259 84,900 Serious Nonattainment Areas > 5 TPY > 50 TPY 1,865 1,369 230 3,369 78 61,916 2,173 66,655 Moderate Nonattainment Areas > 5 TPY > 100 TPY 45 53 25 567 10 17,166 80 17,786 Sources of Carbon Monoxide ( CO) Source Category Thresholds ( TPY) Unregulated Minors Minor Sources Major Sources by CO Attainment Status Potential Minor Major % of fac. % of TPY % of fac. % of TPY % of fac. % of TPY All Sources Emitting CO = Attainment + Nonattainament 65% 0.8% 29% 11% 6% 88%

Attainment Area Sources for CO > 10 TPY > 250 TPY 63% 0.8% 31% 11% 6% 88%

Nonattainment Area Sources for CO* = Serious + Moderate Nonattainment 85% 1.7% 11% 5% 4% 93%

Serious Nonattainment Areas** > 5 TPY > 50 TPY 86% 2.1% 11% 5% 4% 93%

Moderate Nonattainment Areas > 5 TPY > 100 TPY 56% 0.3% 31% 3% 13% 97%

* Total includes 6 facilities, emitting 459 TPY of CO, in nonattainment areas defined as not classified that are not included in the minor/ major breakdown because of undefined cutoffs.

** This analysis assumes that stationary sources contribute significantly to CO levels in all serious nonattainment areas. 3 2 Table 3 2. SO2 Facilities and Emissions Under the Proposed Minor NSR Threshold Sources of Sulfur Dioxide ( SO2) Source Category Thresholds ( TPY) Unregulated Minors Minor Sources Major Sources Total Facilities by SO2 Attainment Status Potential Minor Major # fac. TPY # fac. TPY # fac. TPY # fac. TPY All Sources Emitting SO2 = Attainment + Nonattainament 16,209 18,089 3,296 183,932 1,709 13,700,139 21,214 13,902,160 Attainment Area Sources for SO2 > 10 TPY > 250 TPY 16,068 17,964 3,222 182,134 1,667 13,380,132 20,957 13,580,230 Nonattainment Area Sources for SO2 > 5 TPY > 100 TPY 141 125 74 1,798 42 320,006 257 321,929 Sources of Sulfur Dioxide ( SO2) Source Category Thresholds ( TPY) Unregulated Minors Minor Sources Major Sources by SO2 Attainment Status Potential Minor Major % of fac. % of TPY % of fac. % of TPY % of fac. % of TPY All Sources Emitting SO2 = Attainment + Nonattainament 76% 0.13% 16% 1.3% 8% 99%

Attainment Area Sources for SO2 > 10 TPY > 250 TPY 77% 0.13% 15% 1.3% 8% 99%

Nonattainment Area Sources for SO2 > 5 TPY > 100 TPY 55% 0.04% 29% 0.6% 16% 99%

Table 3 3. NO2 Facilities and Emissions Under the Proposed Minor NSR Threshold Sources of Nitrogen Dioxide ( NO2) Source Category Thresholds ( TPY) Unregulated Minors Minor Sources Major Sources Total Facilities Potential Minor Major # fac. TPY # fac. TPY # fac. TPY # fac. TPY All Sources Emitting NO2 > 10 TPY > 250 TPY 17,869 45,509 9,881 572,764 2,739 7,310,616 30,490 7,928,889 Sources of Nitrogen Dioxide ( NO2) Source Category Thresholds ( TPY) Unregulated Minors Minor Sources Major Sources Potential Minor Major % of fac. % of TPY % of fac. % of TPY % of fac. % of TPY All Sources Emitting NO2 > 10 TPY > 250 TPY 59% 0.6% 23% 7% 9% 92%

Note: no areas are listed as NO2 nonattainment in the current Green Book 3 3 Table 3 4. NOx Facilities and Emissions Under the Proposed Minor NSR Threshold Sources of Oxides of Nitrogen ( NOx) Source Category Thresholds ( TPY) Unregulated Minors Minor Sources Major Sources Total Facilities by 8 hr Ozone Attainment Status Potential Minor Major # fac. TPY # fac. TPY # fac. TPY # fac. TPY All Sources Emitting NOx = Attainment + Nonattainament 16,065 32,630 11,069 498,884 3,356 7,397,375 30,490 7,928,889 Ozone Attainment Area NOx Sources > 10 TPY > 250 TPY 7,006 19,915 5,943 380,657 1,841 4,865,540 14,790 5,266,112 Ozone Nonattainment Area NOx Sources = Sum of Nonattainment Levels 9,059 12,714 5,126 118,227 1,515 2,531,836 15,700 2,662,777 Severe Nonattainment Areas > 5 TPY > 25 TPY 1,823 1,926 327 3,403 143 47,864 2,293 53,193 Serious Nonattainment Areas > 5 TPY > 50 TPY 446 507 187 2,701 36 12,934 669 16,142 Moderate Nonattainment Areas > 5 TPY > 100 TPY 3,889 5,766 2,358 54,879 570 848,390 6,817 909,036 Marginal Nonattainment Areas > 5 TPY > 100 TPY 2,901 4,516 2,254 57,243 766 1,622,648 5,921 1,684,407 Sources of Oxides of Nitrogen ( NOx) Source Category Thresholds ( TPY) Unregulated Minors Minor Sources Major Sources by 8 hr Ozone Attainment Status Potential Minor Major % of fac. % of TPY % of fac. % of TPY % of fac. % of TPY All Sources Emitting NOx = Attainment + Nonattainament 53% 0.4% 36% 6% 11% 93%

Ozone Attainment Area NOx Sources > 10 TPY > 250 TPY 47% 0.4% 40% 7% 12% 92%

Ozone Nonattainment Area NOx Sources = Sum of Nonattainment Levels 58% 0.5% 33% 4% 10% 95%

Severe Nonattainment Areas > 5 TPY > 25 TPY 80% 3.6% 14% 6% 6% 90%

Serious Nonattainment Areas > 5 TPY > 50 TPY 67% 3.1% 28% 17% 5% 80%

Moderate Nonattainment Areas > 5 TPY > 100 TPY 57% 0.6% 35% 6% 8% 93%

Marginal Nonattainment Areas > 5 TPY > 100 TPY 49% 0.3% 38% 3% 13% 96% 3 4 Table 3 5. VOC Facilities and Emissions Under the Proposed Minor NSR Thresholds Sources of Volatile Organic Compounds Source Category Thresholds ( TPY) Unregulated Minors Minor Sources Major Sources Total Facilities ( VOC) by 8 hr Ozone Attainment Status Potential Minor Major # fac. TPY # fac. TPY # fac. TPY # fac. TPY All Sources Emitting VOC = Attainment + Nonattainament 18,403 17,355 22,848 653,926 2,094 924,411 43,345 1,595,692 Ozone Attainment Area VOC Sources > 5 TPY > 250 TPY 8,415 11,438 9,663 438,017 754 499,155 18,832 948,610 Ozone Nonattainment Area VOC Sources = Sum of Nonattainment Levels 9,988 5,917 13,185 215,909 1,340 425,256 24,513 647,082 Severe Nonattainment Areas > 2 TPY > 25 TPY 1,353 887 1,544 11,066 238 17,717 3,135 29,670 Serious Nonattainment Areas > 2 TPY > 50 TPY 548 234 216 2,130 13 1,866 777 4,231 Moderate Nonattainment Areas > 2 TPY > 100 TPY 3,363 1,702 4,774 84,413 390 141,157 8,527 227,271 Marginal Nonattainment Areas > 2 TPY > 100 TPY 4,724 3,094 6,651 118,300 699 264,516 12,074 385,910 Sources of Volatile Organic Compounds Source Category Thresholds ( TPY) Unregulated Minors Minor Sources Major Sources ( VOC) by 8 hr Ozone Attainment Status Potential Minor Major % of fac. % of TPY % of fac. % of TPY % of fac. % of TPY All Sources Emitting VOC = Attainment + Nonattainament 42% 1.1% 53% 41% 5% 58%

Ozone Attainment Area VOC Sources > 5 TPY > 250 TPY 45% 1.2% 51% 46% 4% 53%

Ozone Nonattainment Area VOC Sources = Sum of Nonattainment Levels 41% 0.9% 54% 33% 5% 66%

Severe Nonattainment Areas > 2 TPY > 25 TPY 43% 3.0% 49% 37% 8% 60%

Serious Nonattainment Areas > 2 TPY > 50 TPY 71% 5.5% 28% 50% 2% 44%

Moderate Nonattainment Areas > 2 TPY > 100 TPY 39% 0.7% 56% 37% 5% 62%

Marginal Nonattainment Areas > 2 TPY > 100 TPY 39% 0.8% 55% 31% 6% 69% 3 5 Table 3 6. PM10 Facilities and Emissions Under the Proposed Minor NSR Thresholds Sources of Particulate Matter < 10um Source Category Thresholds ( TPY) Unregulated Minors Minor Sources Major Sources Total Facilities ( PM10) by Attainment Status Potential Minor Major # fac. TPY # fac. TPY # fac. TPY # fac. TPY All Sources Emitting PM10 = Attainment + Nonattainament 21,851 21,816 10,802 377,973 1,212 1,288,423 33,865 1,688,212 Attainment Area Sources for PM10 > 5 TPY > 250 TPY 18,535 20,029 9,601 362,496 1,099 1,235,559 29,235 1,618,084 Nonattainment Area Sources for PM10 = Serious + Moderate Nonattainment 3,316 1,786 1,201 15,478 113 52,864 4,630 70,128 Serious Nonattainment Areas > 1 TPY > 70 TPY 1,902 1,444 374 6,245 45 14,291 2,321 21,981 Moderate Nonattainment Areas > 1 TPY > 100 TPY 1,414 342 827 9,233 68 38,572 2,309 48,147 Sources of Particulate Matter < 10um Source Category Thresholds ( TPY) Unregulated Minors Minor Sources Major Sources ( PM10) by Attainment Status Potential Minor Major % of fac. % of TPY % of fac. % of TPY % of fac. % of TPY All Sources Emitting PM10 = Attainment + Nonattainament 65% 1.3% 32% 22% 4% 76%

Attainment Area Sources for PM10 > 5 TPY > 250 TPY 63% 1.2% 33% 22% 4% 76%

Nonattainment Area Sources for PM10 = Serious + Moderate Nonattainment 72% 2.5% 26% 22% 2% 75%

Serious Nonattainment Areas > 1 TPY > 70 TPY 82% 6.6% 16% 28% 2% 65%

Moderate Nonattainment Areas > 1 TPY > 100 TPY 61% 0.7% 36% 19% 3% 80% 3 6 Table 3 7. PM2.5 Facilities and Emissions Under the Proposed Minor NSR Thresholds Sources of Particulate Matter < 2.5um Source Category Thresholds ( TPY) Unregulated Minors Minor Sources Major Sources Total Facilties ( PM2.5) by Attainment Status Potential Minor Major # fac. TPY # fac. TPY # fac. TPY # fac. TPY All Sources Emitting PM2.5 = Attainment + Nonattainament 19,967 11,262 12,730 301,659 1,080 1,012,725 33,777 1,325,645 Attainment Area Sources for PM2.5 > 3 TPY > 250 TPY 15,392 10,496 8,466 259,961 731 652,336 24,589 922,793 Nonattainment Area Sources for PM2.5 > 0.6 TPY > 100 TPY 4,575 765 4,264 41,697 349 360,389 9,188 402,852 Sources of Particulate Matter < 2.5um Source Category Thresholds ( TPY) Unregulated Minors Minor Sources Major Sources ( PM2.5) by Attainment Status Potential Minor Major % of fac. % of TPY % of fac. % of TPY % of fac. % of TPY All Sources Emitting PM2.5 = Attainment + Nonattainament 59% 0.8% 38% 23% 3% 76%

Attainment Area Sources for PM2.5 > 3 TPY > 250 TPY 63% 1.1% 34% 28% 3% 71%

Nonattainment Area Sources for PM2.5 > 0.6 TPY > 100 TPY 50% 0.2% 46% 10% 4% 89% 3 7 Table 3 8. VOC Facilities and Emissions Under Case 1 Sources of Volatile Organic Compounds Source Category Thresholds ( TPY) Unregulated Minors Minor Sources Major Sources Total Facilities ( VOC) by 8 hr Ozone Attainment Status Potential Minor Major # fac. TPY # fac. TPY # fac. TPY # fac. TPY All Sources Emitting VOC = Attainment + Nonattainament 24,479 45,376 16,772 625,905 2,094 924,411 43,345 1,595,692 Ozone Attainment Area VOC Sources > 10 TPY > 250 TPY 10,466 26,205 7,612 423,250 754 499,155 18,832 948,610 Ozone Nonattainment Area VOC Sources = Sum of Nonattainment Levels 34,013 19,172 9,160 202,654 1,340 425,256 24,513 647,082 Severe Nonattainment Areas > 5 TPY > 25 TPY 2,097 3,362 800 8,591 238 17,717 3,135 29,670 Serious Nonattainment Areas > 5 TPY > 50 TPY 630 494 134 1,870 13 1,866 777 4,231 Moderate Nonattainment Areas > 5 TPY > 100 TPY 4,634 5,894 3,503 80,221 390 141,157 8,527 227,271 Marginal Nonattainment Areas > 5 TPY > 100 TPY 6,652 9,421 4,723 111,972 699 264,516 12,074 385,910 Sources of Volatile Organic Compounds Source Category Thresholds ( TPY) Unregulated Minors Minor Sources Major Sources ( VOC) by 8 hr Ozone Attainment Status Potential Minor Major % of fac. % of TPY % of fac. % of TPY % of fac. % of TPY All Sources Emitting VOC = Attainment + Nonattainament 56% 2.8% 39% 39% 5% 58%

Ozone Attainment Area VOC Sources > 10 TPY > 250 TPY 56% 2.8% 40% 45% 4% 53%

Ozone Nonattainment Area VOC Sources = Sum of Nonattainment Levels 57% 3.0% 37% 31% 5% 66%

Severe Nonattainment Areas > 5 TPY > 25 TPY 67% 11.3% 26% 29% 8% 60%

Serious Nonattainment Areas > 5 TPY > 50 TPY 81% 11.7% 17% 44% 2% 44%

Moderate Nonattainment Areas > 5 TPY > 100 TPY 54% 2.6% 41% 35% 5% 62%

Marginal Nonattainment Areas > 5 TPY > 100 TPY 55% 2.4% 29% 29% 6% 69% 3 8 Table 3 9. CO Facilities and Emissions Under Case 2 Sources of Carbon Monoxide ( CO) Source Category Thresholds ( TPY) Unregulated Minors Minor Sources Major Sources Total Facilities by CO Attainment Status Potential Minor Major # fac. TPY # fac. TPY # fac. TPY # fac. TPY All Sources Emitting CO = Attainment + Nonattainament 20,969 68,961 6,130 452,296 1,816 3,909,012 28,921 4,430,727 Attainment Area Sources for CO > 20 TPY > 250 TPY 18,938 66,686 5,996 449,212 1,728 3,829,929 26,662 4,345,827 Nonattainment Area Sources for CO** = Serious + Moderate Nonattainment 2,031 2,275 134 3,083 88 79,083 2,259 84,900 Serious Nonattainment Areas > 10 TPY > 50 TPY 1,976 2,151 119 2,588 78 61,916 2,173 66,655 Moderate Nonattainment Areas > 10 TPY > 100 TPY 55 124 15 495 10 17,166 80 17,786 Sources of Carbon Monoxide ( CO) Source Category Thresholds ( TPY) Unregulated Minors Minor Sources Major Sources by CO Attainment Status Potential Minor Major % of fac. % of TPY % of fac. % of TPY % of fac. % of TPY All Sources Emitting CO = Attainment + Nonattainament 73% 1.6% 21% 10% 6% 88%

Attainment Area Sources for CO > 20 TPY > 250 TPY 71% 1.5% 22% 10% 6% 88%

Nonattainment Area Sources for CO* = Serious + Moderate Nonattainment 90% 2.7% 6% 4% 4% 93%

Serious Nonattainment Areas** > 10 TPY > 50 TPY 91% 3.2% 5% 4% 4% 93%

Moderate Nonattainment Areas > 10 TPY > 100 TPY 69% 0.7% 19% 3% 13% 97%

* Total includes 6 facilities, emitting 459 TPY of CO, in nonattainment areas defined as not classified that are not included in the minor/ major breakdown because of undefined cutoffs.

** This analysis assumes that stationary sources contribute significantly to CO levels in all serious nonattainment areas. 3 9 Table 3 10. SO2 Facilities and Emissions Under Case 2 Sources of Sulfur Dioxide ( SO2) Source Category Thresholds ( TPY) Unregulated Minors Minor Sources Major Sources Total Facilities by SO2 Attainment Status Potential Minor Major # fac. TPY # fac. TPY # fac. TPY # fac. TPY All Sources Emitting SO2 = Attainment + Nonattainament 17,271 33,159 2,234 168,862 1,709 13,700,139 21,214 13,902,160 Attainment Area Sources for SO2 > 20 TPY > 250 TPY 17,105 32,856 2,185 167,242 1,667 13,380,132 20,957 13,580,230 Nonattainment Area Sources for SO2 > 10 TPY > 100 TPY 166 303 49 1,620 42 320,006 257 321,929 Sources of Sulfur Dioxide ( SO2) Source Category Thresholds ( TPY) Unregulated Minors Minor Sources Major Sources by SO2 Attainment Status Potential Minor Major % of fac. % of TPY % of fac. % of TPY % of fac. % of TPY All Sources Emitting SO2 = Attainment + Nonattainament 81% 0.24% 11% 1.2% 8% 99%

Attainment Area Sources for SO2 > 20 TPY > 250 TPY 82% 0.24% 10% 1.2% 8% 99%

Nonattainment Area Sources for SO2 > 10 TPY > 100 TPY 65% 0.09% 19% 0.5% 16% 99%

Table 3 11. NO2 Facilities and Emissions Under Case 2 Sources of Nitrogen Dioxide ( NO2) Source Category Thresholds ( TPY) Unregulated Minors Minor Sources Major Sources Total Facilities Potential Minor Major # fac. TPY # fac. TPY # fac. TPY # fac. TPY All Sources Emitting NO2 > 20 TPY > 250 TPY 20,730 86,160 7,020 532,113 2,739 7,310,616 30,490 7,928,889 Sources of Nitrogen Dioxide ( NO2) Source Category Thresholds ( TPY) Unregulated Minors Minor Sources Major Sources Potential Minor Major % of fac. % of TPY % of fac. % of TPY % of fac. % of TPY All Sources Emitting NO2 > 20 TPY > 250 TPY 68% 1.1% 23% 7% 9% 92%

Note: no areas are listed as NO2 nonattainment in the current Green Book 3 10 Table 3 12. NOx Facilities and Emissions Under Case 2 Sources of Oxides of Nitrogen ( NOx) Source Category Thresholds ( TPY) Unregulated Minors Minor Sources Major Sources Total Facilities by 8 hr Ozone Attainment Status Potential Minor Major # fac. TPY # fac. TPY # fac. TPY # fac. TPY All Sources Emitting NOx = Attainment + Nonattainament 19,310 65,932 7,824 465,582 3,356 7,397,375 30,490 7,928,889 Ozone Attainment Area NOx Sources > 20 TPY > 250 TPY 8,446 40,338 4,503 360,234 1,841 4,865,540 14,790 5,266,112 Ozone Nonattainment Area NOx Sources = Sum of Nonattainment Levels 10,864 25,594 3,321 105,348 1,515 2,531,836 15,700 2,662,777 Severe Nonattainment Areas > 10 TPY > 25 TPY 2,029 3,404 121 1,924 143 47,864 2,293 53,193 Serious Nonattainment Areas > 10 TPY > 50 TPY 526 1,074 107 2,135 36 12,934 669 16,142 Moderate Nonattainment Areas > 10 TPY > 100 TPY 4,723 11,688 1,524 48,958 570 848,390 6,817 909,036 Marginal Nonattainment Areas > 10 TPY > 100 TPY 3,586 9,429 1,569 52,331 766 1,622,648 5,921 1,684,407 Sources of Oxides of Nitrogen ( NOx) Source Category Thresholds ( TPY) Unregulated Minors Minor Sources Major Sources by 8 hr Ozone Attainment Status Potential Minor Major % of fac. % of TPY % of fac. % of TPY % of fac. % of TPY All Sources Emitting NOx = Attainment + Nonattainament 63% 0.8% 26% 6% 11% 93%

Ozone Attainment Area NOx Sources > 20 TPY > 250 TPY 57% 0.8% 30% 7% 12% 92%

Ozone Nonattainment Area NOx Sources = Sum of Nonattainment Levels 69% 1.0% 21% 4% 10% 95%

Severe Nonattainment Areas > 10 TPY > 25 TPY 88% 6.4% 5% 4% 6% 90%

Serious Nonattainment Areas > 10 TPY > 50 TPY 79% 6.7% 16% 13% 5% 80%

Moderate Nonattainment Areas > 10 TPY > 100 TPY 69% 1.3% 22% 5% 8% 93%

Marginal Nonattainment Areas > 10 TPY > 100 TPY 61% 0.6% 26% 3% 13% 96% 3 11 Table 3 13. VOC Facilities and Emissions Under Case 2 Sources of Volatile Organic Compounds Source Category Thresholds ( TPY) Unregulated Minors Minor Sources Major Sources Total Facilities ( VOC) by 8 hr Ozone Attainment Status Potential Minor Major # fac. TPY # fac. TPY # fac. TPY # fac. TPY All Sources Emitting VOC = Attainment + Nonattainament 29,682 97,923 11,569 573,358 2,094 924,411 43,345 1,595,692 Ozone Attainment Area VOC Sources > 20 TPY > 250 TPY 12,597 56,874 5,481 392,581 754 499,155 18,832 948,610 Ozone Nonattainment Area VOC Sources = Sum of Nonattainment Levels 17,085 41,050 6,088 180,776 1,340 425,256 24,513 647,082 Severe Nonattainment Areas > 10 TPY > 25 TPY 2,536 6,432 361 5,521 238 17,717 3,135 29,670 Serious Nonattainment Areas > 10 TPY > 50 TPY 691 933 73 1,431 13 1,866 777 4,231 Moderate Nonattainment Areas > 10 TPY > 100 TPY 5,710 13,553 2,427 72,561 390 141,157 8,527 227,271 Marginal Nonattainment Areas > 10 TPY > 100 TPY 8,148 20,130 3,227 101,263 699 264,516 12,074 385,910 Sources of Volatile Organic Compounds Source Category Thresholds ( TPY) Unregulated Minors Minor Sources Major Sources ( VOC) by 8 hr Ozone Attainment Status Potential Minor Major % of fac. % of TPY % of fac. % of TPY % of fac. % of TPY All Sources Emitting VOC = Attainment + Nonattainament 68% 6.1% 27% 36% 5% 58%

Ozone Attainment Area VOC Sources > 20 TPY > 250 TPY 67% 6.0% 29% 41% 4% 53%

Ozone Nonattainment Area VOC Sources = Sum of Nonattainment Levels 70% 6.3% 25% 28% 5% 66%

Severe Nonattainment Areas > 10 TPY > 25 TPY 81% 21.7% 12% 19% 8% 60%

Serious Nonattainment Areas > 10 TPY > 50 TPY 89% 22.1% 9% 34% 2% 44%

Moderate Nonattainment Areas > 10 TPY > 100 TPY 67% 6.0% 28% 32% 5% 62%

Marginal Nonattainment Areas > 10 TPY > 100 TPY 67% 5.2% 27% 26% 6% 69% 3 12 Table 3 14. PM10 Facilities and Emissions Under Case 2 Sources of Particulate Matter < 10um Source Category Thresholds ( TPY) Unregulated Minors Minor Sources Major Sources Total Facilities ( PM10) by Attainment Status Potential Minor Major # fac. TPY # fac. TPY # fac. TPY # fac. TPY All Sources Emitting PM10 = Attainment + Nonattainament 22,036 21,846 10,617 377,944 1,212 1,288,423 33,865 1,688,212 Attainment Area Sources for PM10 > 5 TPY > 250 TPY 18,535 20,029 9,601 362,496 1,099 1,235,559 29,235 1,618,084 Nonattainment Area Sources for PM10 = Serious + Moderate Nonattainment 3,501 1,816 1,016 15,448 113 52,864 4,630 70,128 Serious Nonattainment Areas > 3 TPY > 70 TPY 1,767 910 509 6,780 45 14,291 2,321 21,981 Moderate Nonattainment Areas > 3 TPY > 100 TPY 1,734 906 507 8,668 68 38,572 2,309 48,147 Sources of Particulate Matter < 10um Source Category Thresholds ( TPY) Unregulated Minors Minor Sources Major Sources ( PM10) by Attainment Status Potential Minor Major % of fac. % of TPY % of fac. % of TPY % of fac. % of TPY All Sources Emitting PM10 = Attainment + Nonattainament 65% 1.3% 31% 22% 4% 76%

Attainment Area Sources for PM10 > 5 TPY > 250 TPY 63% 1.2% 33% 22% 4% 76%

Nonattainment Area Sources for PM10 = Serious + Moderate Nonattainment 76% 2.6% 22% 22% 2% 75%

Serious Nonattainment Areas > 1 TPY > 70 TPY 76% 4.1% 22% 31% 2% 65%

Moderate Nonattainment Areas > 1 TPY > 100 TPY 75% 1.9% 22% 18% 3% 80% 3 13 Table 3 15. PM2.5 Facilities and Emissions Under Case 2 Sources of Particulate Matter < 2.5um Source Category Thresholds ( TPY) Unregulated Minors Minor Sources Major Sources Total Facilties ( PM2.5) by Attainment Status Potential Minor Major # fac. TPY # fac. TPY # fac. TPY # fac. TPY All Sources Emitting PM2.5 = Attainment + Nonattainament 20,969 11,831 12,001 301,090 1,080 1,012,725 33,777 1,325,645 Attainment Area Sources for PM2.5 > 3 TPY > 250 TPY 15,392 10,496 8,466 259,961 731 652,336 24,589 922,793 Nonattainment Area Sources for PM2.5 > 1 TPY > 100 TPY 5,304 1,334 3,535 41,129 349 360,389 9,188 402,852 Sources of Particulate Matter < 2.5um Source Category Thresholds ( TPY) Unregulated Minors Minor Sources Major Sources ( PM2.5) by Attainment Status Potential Minor Major % of fac. % of TPY % of fac. % of TPY % of fac. % of TPY All Sources Emitting PM2.5 = Attainment + Nonattainament 61% 0.9% 36% 23% 3% 76%

Attainment Area Sources for PM2.5 > 3 TPY > 250 TPY 63% 1.1% 34% 28% 3% 71%

Nonattainment Area Sources for PM2.5 > 1 TPY > 100 TPY 58% 0.3% 38% 10% 4% 89%


[Federal Register Volume 76, Number 185 (Friday, September 23, 2011)]
[Notices]
[Page 59144]
[FR Doc No: 2011-24400]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES

Food and Drug Administration

[Docket No. FDA-2010-N-0318]

Novartis Pharmaceuticals Corp. et al.; Withdrawal of Approval of
27 New Drug Applications and 58 Abbreviated New Drug Applications;
Correction

AGENCY: Food and Drug Administration, HHS.

ACTION: Notice; correction.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Food and Drug Administration (FDA) is correcting a notice
that appeared in the Federal Register of July 21, 2010 (75 FR 42455).
The document withdrew approval of 27 new drug applications (NDAs) and
58 abbreviated new drug applications (ANDAs) from multiple applicants.
The published document excluded a footnote in the table. This document
corrects that error.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Joyce Strong, Office of Policy, Food
and Drug Administration, 10903 New Hampshire Ave., Bldg. 32, rm. 3208,
Silver Spring, MD 20993-0002,<PHONE_NUMBER>.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: In FR Doc. 2010-17785, appearing on page
42455, in the Federal Register of Wednesday, July 21, 2010, the
following correction is made:
    1. On page 42456, in Table 1, under the ``Drug'' column, correct
the entry for ``Proventil (albuterol USP) Inhalation Aerosol'' to read
``Proventil (albuterol USP) Inhalation Aerosol \1\''.
    2. On page 42456, at the end of the table, add footnote number 1 to
read:

    This product included an oral pressurized metered-dose inhaler
that contained chlorofluorocarbons (CFCs) as a propellant. CFCs may
no longer be used as a propellant for any albuterol metered-dose
inhalers. (See 70 FR 17168, April 4, 2005.)

    Dated: September 19, 2011.
Leslie Kux,
Acting Assistant Commissioner for Policy.
[FR Doc. 2011-24400 Filed 9-22-11; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4160-01-P


[Federal Register: June 2, 2006 (Volume 71, Number 106)]
[Notices]
[Page 32066]
[DOCID:fr02jn06-56]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission

[Docket No. CP02-60-009]

Trunkline LNG Company, LLC; Notice of Compliance Filing

May 26, 2006.
    Take notice that on May 24, 2006, Trunkline LNG Company, LLC
(Trunkline LNG) submitted a compliance filing pursuant to the
Commission's order issued September 17, 2004 in Docket Nos. CP04-64-000
and CP02-60-004. This compliance filing includes tariff sheets to place
facilities in service upon completion of the Modified Expansion
Project.
    Trunkline LNG states that copies of the filing were served on
parties on the official service list in the above-captioned proceeding.
    Any person desiring to protest this filing must file in accordance
with Rule 211 of the Commission's Rules of Practice and Procedure (18
CFR 385.211). Protests to this filing will be considered by the
Commission in determining the appropriate action to be taken, but will
not serve to make protestants parties to the proceeding. Such protests
must be filed on or before the date as indicated below. Anyone filing a
protest must serve a copy of that document on all the parties to the
proceeding.
    The Commission encourages electronic submission of protests in lieu
of paper using the ``eFiling'' link at http://www.ferc.gov. Persons

unable to file electronically should submit an original and 14 copies
of the protest to the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission, 888 First
Street, NE., Washington, DC 20426.
    This filing is accessible on-line at http://www.ferc.gov, using the

``eLibrary'' link and is available for review in the Commission's
Public Reference Room in Washington, DC. There is an ``eSubscription''
link on the Web site that enables subscribers to receive e-mail
notification when a document is added to a subscribed docket(s). For
assistance with any FERC Online service, please e-mail
<EMAIL_ADDRESS>or call<PHONE_NUMBER> (toll free). For

TTY, call<PHONE_NUMBER>.
    Comment Date: 5 p.m. Eastern Time on June 16, 2006.

Magalie R. Salas,
Secretary.
 [FR Doc. E6-8608 Filed 6-1-06; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 6717-01-P


[Federal Register Volume 88, Number 172 (Thursday, September 7, 2023)]
[Notices]
[Page 61588]
[FR Doc No: 2023-19306]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission

[Docket No. ER23-2729-000]

Robin Hollow Solar, LLC; Supplemental Notice That Initial Market-
Based Rate Filing Includes Request for Blanket Section 204
Authorization

    This is a supplemental notice in the above-referenced proceeding of
Robin Hollow Solar, LLC's application for market-based rate authority,
with an accompanying rate tariff, noting that such application includes
a request for blanket authorization, under 18 CFR part 34, of future
issuances of securities and assumptions of liability.
    Any person desiring to intervene or to protest should file with the
Federal Energy Regulatory Commission, 888 First Street NE, Washington,
DC 20426, in accordance with Rules 211 and 214 of the Commission's
Rules of Practice and Procedure (18 CFR 385.211 and 385.214). Anyone
filing a motion to intervene or protest must serve a copy of that
document on the Applicant.
    Notice is hereby given that the deadline for filing protests with
regard to the applicant's request for blanket authorization, under 18
CFR part 34, of future issuances of securities and assumptions of
liability, is September 20, 2023.
    The Commission encourages electronic submission of protests and
interventions in lieu of paper, using the FERC Online links at http://www.ferc.gov. To facilitate electronic service, persons with internet
access who will eFile a document and/or be listed as a contact for an
intervenor must create and validate an eRegistration account using the
eRegistration link. Select the eFiling link to log on and submit the
intervention or protests.
    Persons unable to file electronically may mail similar pleadings to
the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission, 888 First Street NE,
Washington, DC 20426. Hand delivered submissions in docketed
proceedings should be delivered to Health and Human Services, 12225
Wilkins Avenue, Rockville, Maryland 20852.
    In addition to publishing the full text of this document in the
Federal Register, the Commission provides all interested persons an
opportunity to view and/or print the contents of this document via the
internet through the Commission's Home Page (http://www.ferc.gov) using
the ``eLibrary'' link. Enter the docket number excluding the last three
digits in the docket number field to access the document. At this time,
the Commission has suspended access to the Commission's Public
Reference Room, due to the proclamation declaring a National Emergency
concerning the Novel Coronavirus Disease (COVID-19), issued by the
President on March 13, 2020. For assistance, contact the Federal Energy
Regulatory Commission at [email protected] or call toll-free,
(886) 208-3676 or TYY,<PHONE_NUMBER>.
    The Commission's Office of Public Participation (OPP) supports
meaningful public engagement and participation in Commission
proceedings. OPP can help members of the public, including landowners,
environmental justice communities, Tribal members and others, access
publicly available information and navigate Commission processes. For
public inquiries and assistance with making filings such as
interventions, comments, or requests for rehearing, the public is
encouraged to contact OPP at<PHONE_NUMBER> or [email protected].

    Dated: August 31, 2023.
Debbie-Anne A. Reese,
Deputy Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2023-19306 Filed 9-6-23; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6717-01-P


[Federal Register: May 21, 2010 (Volume 75, Number 98)]
[Notices]
[Page 28630]
[DOCID:fr21my10-103]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY

Federal Emergency Management Agency

[Internal Agency Docket No. FEMA-1911-DR; Docket ID FEMA-2010-0002]

California; Major Disaster and Related Determinations

AGENCY: Federal Emergency Management Agency, DHS.

ACTION: Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: This is a notice of the Presidential declaration of a major
disaster for the State of California (FEMA-1911-DR), dated May 7, 2010,
and related determinations.

DATES: Effective Date: May 7, 2010.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Peggy Miller, Recovery Directorate,
Federal Emergency Management Agency, 500 C Street, SW., Washington, DC
20472,<PHONE_NUMBER>.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Notice is hereby given that, in a letter
dated May 7, 2010, the President issued a major disaster declaration
under the authority of the Robert T. Stafford Disaster Relief and
Emergency Assistance Act, 42 U.S.C. 5121 et seq. (the ``Stafford
Act''), as follows:

    I have determined that the damage in certain areas of the State
of California resulting from an earthquake beginning on April 4,
2010, and continuing, is of sufficient severity and magnitude to
warrant a major disaster declaration under the Robert T. Stafford
Disaster Relief and Emergency Assistance Act, 42 U.S.C. 5121 et seq.
(the ``Stafford Act''). Therefore, I declare that such a major
disaster exists in the State of California.
    In order to provide Federal assistance, you are hereby
authorized to allocate from funds available for these purposes such
amounts as you find necessary for Federal disaster assistance and
administrative expenses.
    You are authorized to provide Public Assistance in the
designated areas and Hazard Mitigation throughout the State. Direct
Federal assistance is authorized. Consistent with the requirement
that Federal assistance is supplemental, any Federal funds provided
under the Stafford Act for Public Assistance and Hazard Mitigation
will be limited to 75 percent of the total eligible costs.
    Further, you are authorized to make changes to this declaration
for the approved assistance to the extent allowable under the
Stafford Act.

    The Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA) hereby gives notice
that pursuant to the authority vested in the Administrator, under
Executive Order 12148, as amended, Sandy Coachman, of FEMA is appointed
to act as the Federal Coordinating Officer for this major disaster.
    The following area of the State of California has been designated
as adversely affected by this major disaster:

    Imperial County for Public Assistance. Direct Federal Assistance
is authorized.
    All counties within the State of California are eligible to
apply for assistance under the Hazard Mitigation Grant Program.
    The following Catalog of Federal Domestic Assistance Numbers
(CFDA) are to be used for reporting and drawing funds: 97.030,
Community Disaster Loans; 97.031, Cora Brown Fund; 97.032, Crisis
Counseling; 97.033, Disaster Legal Services; 97.034, Disaster
Unemployment Assistance (DUA); 97.046, Fire Management Assistance
Grant; 97.048, Disaster Housing Assistance to Individuals and
Households in Presidentially Declared Disaster Areas; 97.049,
Presidentially Declared Disaster Assistance--Disaster Housing
Operations for Individuals and Households; 97.050, Presidentially
Declared Disaster Assistance to Individuals and Households--Other
Needs; 97.036, Disaster Grants--Public Assistance (Presidentially
Declared Disasters); 97.039, Hazard Mitigation Grant.

W. Craig Fugate,
Administrator, Federal Emergency Management Agency.
[FR Doc. 2010-12193 Filed 5-20-10; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 9111-23-P


[Federal Register: October 20, 2008 (Volume 73, Number 203)]
[Notices]
[Page 62350-62351]
[DOCID:fr20oc08-112]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

[Release No. 34-58771; File No. SR-CBOE-2008-101]

Self-Regulatory Organizations; Chicago Board Options Exchange,
Incorporated; Notice of Filing and Immediate Effectiveness of Proposed
Rule Change to Delete Chapter XXX and References to Chapter XXX
Throughout the CBOE Rulebook

October 10, 2008.
    Pursuant to Section 19(b)(1) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934
(the ``Act'') \1\ and Rule 19b-4 thereunder,\2\ notice is hereby given
that on October 6, 2008, the Chicago Board Options Exchange,
Incorporated (``Exchange'' or ``CBOE'') filed with the Securities and
Exchange Commission (the ``Commission'') the proposed rule change as
described in Items I and II below, which Items have been prepared by
the Exchange. The Exchange filed the proposal as a ``non-
controversial'' proposed rule change pursuant to Section
19(b)(3)(A)(iii) of the Act \3\ and Rule 19b-4(f)(6) thereunder.\4\ The
Commission is publishing this notice to solicit comments on the
proposed rule change from interested persons.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \1\ 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(1).
    \2\ 17 CFR 240.19b-4.
    \3\ 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(3)(A)(iii).
    \4\ 17 CFR 240.19b-4(f)(6).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

I. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement of the Terms of Substance
of the Proposed Rule Change

    CBOE proposes to delete Chapter XXX (Trading in Stocks, Warrants
and Other Securities) from the CBOE Rulebook. In addition, CBOE
proposes to delete references to Chapter XXX rules throughout the CBOE
Rulebook. The text of the rule proposal is available on the Exchange's
Web site (http://www.cboe.org/legal), at the Exchange's Office of the
Secretary and at the Commission.

II. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement of the Purpose of, and
Statutory Basis for, the Proposed Rule Change

    In its filing with the Commission, the self-regulatory organization
included statements concerning the purpose of and basis for the
proposed rule change and discussed any comments it received on the
proposed rule change. The text of those statements may be examined at
the places specified in Item IV below. The Exchange has prepared
summaries, set forth in sections A, B, and C below, of the most
significant parts of such statements.

A. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement of the Purpose of, and
Statutory Basis for, the Proposed Rule Change

1. Purpose
    The purpose of this proposed rule change is to delete Chapter XXX
(Trading in Stocks, Warrants and Other Securities) from the CBOE
Rulebook.\5\ In addition, CBOE proposes to delete references to Chapter
XXX rules throughout the CBOE Rulebook. Chapter XXX governed the
trading of non-option securities traded on CBOE's stand-alone stock
platform in an open-outcry environment. All non-option securities that
previously traded under Chapter XXX now trade pursuant to Chapters L
through LIV.\6\ Consequently, it is no longer necessary to include
Chapter XXX in the CBOE Rulebook, and the chapter will be deleted in
its entirety, along with all references to Chapter XXX rules throughout
the CBOE Rulebook.\7\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \5\ Chapter XXX was adopted in 1990. See Securities Exchange Act
Release No. 28556 (October 19, 1990), 55 FR 43233 (October 26, 1990)
(SR-CBOE-90-08).
    \6\ Chapters L through LIV govern the trading of non-option
securities on the CBOE Stock Exchange (CBSX), a screen-based
facility of CBOE.
    \7\ The Exchange is also proposing to amend the Introduction
paragraph to Chapter L, which references Chapter XXX. In addition,
the Exchange is replacing references to Chapter 55 with Chapter 54
in the Introduction paragraph for Chapter L and in the Appendix A to
Chapters 50 to 54, since Chapter 55 was previously deleted. See
Securities Exchange Act Release No. 55034 (December 29, 2006), 72 FR
1350 (January 11, 2007) (notice for SR-CBOE-2006-112) (filing, among
other things, deleted all rules (Chapter LV) regarding the
Intermarket Trading Systems); see also Securities Exchange Act
Release No. 55392 (March 2, 2007), 73 FR 10572 (March 8, 2007)
(approval order for SR-CBOE-2006-112).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

2. Statutory Basis
    The Exchange believes that the proposed rule change is consistent
with the requirements provided under Section 6(b)(5) \8\ of the Act,
that the rules of an exchange be designed to promote just and equitable
principles of trade, to prevent fraudulent and manipulative acts and,
in general, to protect investors and the public interest.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \8\ 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(5).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

B. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement on Burden on Competition

    CBOE does not believe that the proposed rule change will impose any
burden on competition not necessary or appropriate in furtherance of
the purposes of the Act.

C. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement on Comments on the Proposed
Rule Change Received From Members, Participants or Others

    No written comments were solicited or received with respect to the
proposed rule change.

III. Date of Effectiveness of the Proposed Rule Change and Timing for
Commission Action

    Because the foregoing proposed rule change does not: (1)
Significantly affect the protection of investors or the public
interest; (2) impose any significant burden on competition; and (3)
become operative for 30 days from the date on which it was filed, or
such shorter time as the Commission may designate if consistent with
the protection of investors and the public interest, it has become
effective pursuant to Section 19(b)(3)(A) of the Act \9\ and Rule 19b-
4(f)(6) thereunder.\10\ At any time within

60 days of the filing of such proposed rule change, the Commission may
summarily abrogate such rule change if it appears to the Commission
that such action is necessary or appropriate in the public interest,
for the protection of investors, or otherwise in furtherance of the
purposes of the Act.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \9\ 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(3)(A).
    \10\ 17 CFR 240.19b-4(f)(6). In addition, when filing a proposed
rule change pursuant to Rule 19b-4(f)(6) under the Act, an Exchange
is required to give the Commission written notice of its intent to
file the proposed rule change, along with a brief description and
text of the proposed rule change, at least five business days prior
to the date of filing of the proposed rule change, or such shorter
time as designated by the Commission. The Exchange provided such
notice to the Commission.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

IV. Solicitation of Comments

    Interested persons are invited to submit written data, views, and
arguments concerning the foregoing, including whether the proposed rule
change is consistent with the Act. Comments may be submitted by any of
the following methods:

Electronic Comments

     Use the Commission's Internet comment form (http://
www.sec.gov/rules/sro.shtml); or
     Send an e-mail to<EMAIL_ADDRESS>Please include
File Number SR-CBOE-2008-101 on the subject line.

Paper Comments

     Send paper comments in triplicate to Secretary, Securities
and Exchange Commission, 100 F Street, NE., Washington, DC 20549-1090.

All submissions should refer to File Number SR-CBOE-2008-101. This file
number should be included on the subject line if e-mail is used. To
help the Commission process and review your comments more efficiently,
please use only one method. The Commission will post all comments on
the Commission's Internet Web site (http://www.sec.gov/rules/
sro.shtml). Copies of the submission, all subsequent amendments, all
written statements with respect to the proposed rule change that are
filed with the Commission, and all written communications relating to
the proposed rule change between the Commission and any person, other
than those that may be withheld from the public in accordance with the
provisions of 5 U.S.C. 552, will be available for inspection and
copying in the Commission's Public Reference Room, 100 F Street, NE.,
Washington, DC 20549, on official business days between the hours of 10
a.m. and 3 p.m. Copies of the filing also will be available for
inspection and copying at the principal office of the CBOE. All
comments received will be posted without change; the Commission does
not edit personal identifying information from submissions. You should
submit only information that you wish to make available publicly. All
submissions should refer to File Number SR-CBOE-2008-101 and should be
submitted on or before November 10, 2008.

    For the Commission, by the Division of Trading and Markets,
pursuant to delegated authority.\11\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \11\ 17 CFR 200.30-3(a)(12).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

Florence E. Harmon,
Acting Secretary.
 [FR Doc. E8-24738 Filed 10-17-08; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 8011-01-P


[Federal Register: October 26, 2010 (Volume 75, Number 206)]
[Notices]
[Page 65693-65695]
[DOCID:fr26oc10-136]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

[Release No. 34-63135; File No. SR-NASDAQ-2010-131]

Self-Regulatory Organizations; Notice of Filing and Immediate
Effectiveness of Proposed Rule Change by the NASDAQ Stock Market, LLC
To Expand the $0.50 Strike Price Program

Date: October 20, 2010.
    Pursuant to Section 19(b)(1) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934
(``Act'') \1\ and Rule 19b-4 thereunder,\2\ notice is hereby given
that, on October 13, 2010, The NASDAQ Stock Market LLC (``NASDAQ'' or
the ``Exchange'') filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission
(``SEC'' or ``Commission'') the proposed rule change as described in
Items I and II below, which Items have been prepared by the Exchange.
The Commission is publishing this notice to solicit comments on the
proposed rule change from interested persons.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \1\ 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(1).
    \2\ 17 CFR 240.19b-4.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

I. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement of the Terms of Substance
of the Proposed Rule Change

    The NASDAQ Stock Market LLC proposes to amend Chapter IV titled
Securities Traded on NOM, Sec. 6 (Series of Options Contracts Open for
Trading), specifically the Exchange's $.50 Strike Price Program (the
``$.50 Strike Program'' or ``Program'') \3\ to: (i) Expand the $.50
Strike Program for strike prices below $1.00; (ii) extend the $.50
Strike Program to strike prices that are $5.50 or less; (iii) extend
the prices of the underlying security to at or below $5.00; and (iv)
extend the number of options classes overlying 20 individual stocks.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \3\ See Securities Exchange Act Release Nos. 59277 (November 6,
2009), 74 FR 59277 (November 17, 2009 (SR-NASDAQ-2009-099) (order
approving); and 61736 (March 18, 2010), 75 FR 14229 (March 24, 2010)
(SR-NASDAQ-2010-038) (notice of filing and immediate effectiveness
allowing concurrent listing of $3.50 and $4 strikes for classes that
participate in both the $0.50 Strike Program and the $1 Strike
Program).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    The text of the proposed rule change is available on the Exchange's
Web site at http://www.nasdaq.cchwallstreet.com, at the principal
office of the Exchange, on the Commission's Web site at http://
www.sec.gov, and at the Commission's Public Reference Room.

II. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement of the Purpose of, and
Statutory Basis for, the Proposed Rule Change

    In its filing with the Commission, the Exchange included statements
concerning the purpose of and basis for the proposed rule change. The
text of these statements may be examined at the places specified in
Item IV below. The Exchange has prepared summaries, set forth in
sections A, B, and C below, of the most significant aspects of such
statements.

A. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement of the Purpose of, and
Statutory Basis for, the Proposed Rule Change

1. Purpose
    The purpose of this proposed rule change is to modify Supplementary
Material of Chapter IV, Section 6 at .05 to expand the $.50 Strike
Program in order to provide investors with opportunities and strategies
to minimize losses associated with owning a stock declining in price.
    The Exchange is proposing to establish strike price intervals of
$.50, beginning at $.50 for certain options classes where the strike
price is $5.50 or less and whose underlying security closed at or below
$5.00 in its primary market on the previous trading day and which have
national average daily volume that equals or exceeds 1,000 contracts
per day as determined by The Options Clearing Corporation (``OCC'')
during the preceding three calendar months. The Exchange also proposes
to limit the listing of $.50 strike prices to

options classes overlying no more than 20 individual stocks as
specifically designated by the Exchange.
    Currently, Supplementary Material of Chapter IV, Section 6 at .05
permits strike price intervals of $.50 or greater beginning at $1.00
where the strike price is $3.50 or less, but only for option classes
whose underlying security closed at or below $3.00 in its primary
market on the previous trading day and which have national average
daily volume that equals or exceeds 1,000 contracts per day as
determined by The Options Clearing Corporation during the preceding
three calendar months. Further, the listing of $.50 strike prices is
limited to options classes overlying no more than 5 individual stocks
as specifically designated by the Exchange. The Exchange is currently
restricted from listing series with $1 intervals within $0.50 of an
existing strike price in the same series, except that strike prices of
$2, $3, and $4 shall be permitted within $0.50 of an existing strike
price for classes also selected to participate in the $0.50 Strike
Program.\4\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \4\ See Supplementary Material of Chapter IV, Section 6 at 02(b)
referring to the $1 Strike Program.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    The number of $.50 strike options traded on the Exchange has
continued to increase since the inception of the Program. There are now
approximately 19 of the $.50 strike price option classes listed, and
traded, across all options exchanges including NOM; 1 of which is a
class chosen by NOM for the $0.50 Strike Program. The proposal would
expand $.50 strike offerings to market participants, such as traders
and retail investors, and thereby enhance their ability to tailor
investing and hedging strategies and opportunities in a volatile market
place.
    By way of example, if an investor wants to invest in 5,000 shares
of Sirius Satellite (``SIRI'') at $ 0.9678,\5\ the only choice the
investor would have today would be to buy out-of-the-money calls, at
the $1.00 strike, or to invest in the underlying stock with a total
outlay of $.96 per share or $4,800. However, if a $.50 strike series
were available, an investor may be able to invest in 5,000 shares by
purchasing an exercisable in-the-money $.50 strike call option. It is
reasonable to assume that with SIRI trading at $.96, the $.50 strike
call option would trade at an estimated price of $.46 to $.48 under
normal circumstances. This would allow the investor to manage 5,000
shares with the same upside potential return for a cost of only $2,350
(assuming $.47 as a call price).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \5\ SIRI was trading at $0.9678 on July 13, 2010.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    Similarly, if an investor wanted to spend $4,800 for 5,000 shares
of SIRI, a $.50 put option that would trade for $.01 to $.05 would
provide protection against a declining stock price in the event that
SIRI dropped below $.50 per share. In a down market, where high volume
widely held shares drop below $1.00, investors deserve the opportunity
to hedge downside risk in the same manner as investors have with stocks
greater than $1.00.
    Increasing the threshold from $3.00 to $5.00 and expanding the
number of $0.50 strikes available for stocks under $5.00 further aids
investors by offering opportunities to manage risk and execute a
variety of option strategies to improve returns. For example, today an
investor can enhance their yield by selling an out-of-the-money call.
Using an example of an investor who wants to hedge Citigroup (``C'')
which is trading at $4.24,\6\ that investor would be able to choose the
$4.50 strike which is 6% out-of-the-money or they would be able to
choose the $5.00 strike which is 17.92% out-of-the-money, under this
proposal. Today, this investor only has the latter choice. Beyond that,
this investor today may choose the $6.00 strike which is 41% out-of-
the-money and offers significantly less premium. Pursuant to this
proposal if this investor had a choice to hedge with a $5.50 strike
option, the investor would have the opportunity to sell the option at
only 29% out-of-the-money and would improve their return by gaining
more premium, while also benefitting from 29% of upside return in the
underlying equity.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \6\ This was the price for C on July 14, 2010.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    By increasing the number of securities from 5 individual stocks to
20 individual stocks would allow the Exchange to offer investors
additional opportunities to use the $0.50 Strike Program. The Exchange
notes that $0.50 strikes have had no impact on capacity. Further, the
Exchange has observed the popularity of $0.50 strikes. The open
interest in the $2.50 August strike series for Synovus Financial Corp.
(``SNV''), which closed at $2.71 on July 13, 2010, was 12,743 options;
whereas open interest in the $2 and $3 August strike series was a
combined 318 options. The open interest in the August $1.50 strike
series for Ambac Financial Group, Inc. (``ABK''), which closed at
$0.7490 on July 13, 2010, was 15,879 options compared to 8,174 options
for the $2 strike series. The August $2.50 strike series had open
interest of 22,280 options, also more than the traditional $2 strike
series.
    By expanding the $.50 Strike Program investors would be able to
better enhance returns and manage risk by providing investors with
significantly greater flexibility in the trading of equity options that
overlie lower price stocks by allowing investors to establish equity
options positions that are better tailored to meet their investment,
trading and risk
    The Exchange also proposes making a corresponding amendment to
Supplementary Material of Chapter IV, Section 6 at 02(b) to add $5 and
$6 to $1 Strike Program language that addresses listing series with $1
intervals within $0.50 of an existing strike price in the same series.
Currently, and to account for the overlap with the $.50 Strike Program,
the following series are excluded from this prohibition: Strike prices
of $2, $3, and $4. The Exchange proposes to add $5 and $6 to that list
to account for the proposal to expand the $.50 Strike Program to a
strike price of $5.50.
2. Statutory Basis
    The Exchange believes that its proposal is consistent with Section
6(b) of the Act \7\ in general, and furthers the objectives of Section
6(b)(5) of the Act \8\ in particular, in that it is designed to promote
just and equitable principles of trade, to remove impediments to and
perfect the mechanism of a free and open market and a national market
system, and, in general to protect investors and the public interest.
The Exchange believes that amending the current $.50 Strike Program
will result in a continuing benefit to investors by giving them more
flexibility to closely tailor their investment decisions in a greater
number of securities. Investors would be provided with an opportunity
to minimize losses associated with declining stock prices which do not
exist today. With the increase in active, low-prices securities, the
Exchange believes that amending the $.50 Strike Program to allow a $.50
strike interval below $1 for strike prices of $5.50 or less is
necessary to provide investor additional opportunity to minimize and
manage risk.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \7\ 15 U.S.C. 78f(b).
    \8\ 15 U.S.C. 78f(b)(5).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

B. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement on Burden on Competition

    The Exchange does not believe that the proposed rule change will
impose any burden on competition that is not necessary or appropriate
in furtherance of the purposes of the Act.

C. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement on Comments on the Proposed
Rule Change Received From Members, Participants, or Others

    No written comments were solicited or received.

III. Date of Effectiveness of the Proposed Rule Change and Timing for
Commission Action

    Because the foregoing proposed rule change does not significantly
affect the protection of investors or the public interest, does not
impose any significant burden on competition, and, by its terms, does
not become operative for 30 days from the date on which it was filed,
or such shorter time as the Commission may designate, it has become
effective pursuant to Section 19(b)(3)(A) of the Act \9\ and Rule 19b-
4(f)(6) thereunder.\10\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \9\ 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(3)(A).
    \10\ 17 CFR 240.19b-4(f)(6). In addition, Rule 19b-4(f)(6)(iii)
requires the Exchange to give the Commission written notice of the
Exchange's intent to file the proposed rule change, along with a
brief description and text of the proposed rule change, at least
five business days prior to the date of filing of the proposed rule
change, or such shorter time as designated by the Commission. The
Exchange has satisfied this requirement.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    The Exchange has requested that the Commission waive the 30-day
operative delay. The Commission believes that waiver of the operative
delay is consistent with the protection of investors and the public
interest because the proposal is substantially similar to that of
another exchange that has been approved by the Commission.\11\
Therefore, the Commission designates the proposal operative upon
filing.\12\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \11\ See Securities Exchange Act Release No. 63132 (October 19,
2010) (SR-Phlx-2010-118) (order approving expansion of $0.50 Strike
Price Program).
    \12\ For purposes only of waiving the 30-day operative delay,
the Commission has considered the proposed rule's impact on
efficiency, competition, and capital formation. See 15 U.S.C.
78c(f).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    At any time within 60 days of the filing of the proposed rule
change, the Commission summarily may temporarily suspend such rule
change if it appears to the Commission that such action is necessary or
appropriate in the public interest, for the protection of investors, or
otherwise in furtherance of the purposes of the Act.

IV. Solicitation of Comments

    Interested persons are invited to submit written data, views, and
arguments concerning the foregoing, including whether the proposed rule
change is consistent with the Act. Comments may be submitted by any of
the following methods:

Electronic Comments

     Use the Commission's Internet comment form (http://
www.sec.gov/rules/sro.shtml); or
     Send an e-mail to<EMAIL_ADDRESS>Please include
File Number SR-NASDAQ-2010-131 on the subject line.

Paper Comments

     Send paper comments in triplicate to Elizabeth M. Murphy,
Secretary, Securities and Exchange Commission, 100 F Street, NE.,
Washington, DC 20549-1090.

All submissions should refer to File Number SR-NASDAQ-2010-131. This
file number should be included on the subject line if e-mail is used.
To help the Commission process and review your comments more
efficiently, please use only one method. The Commission will post all
comments on the Commission's Internet Web site (http://www.sec.gov/
rules/sro.shtml). Copies of the submission, all subsequent amendments,
all written statements with respect to the proposed rule change that
are filed with the Commission, and all written communications relating
to the proposed rule change between the Commission and any person,
other than those that may be withheld from the public in accordance
with the provisions of 5 U.S.C. 552, will be available for Web site
viewing and printing in the Commission's Public Reference Room, 100 F
Street, NE., Washington, DC 20549, on official business days between
the hours of 10 a.m. and 3 p.m. Copies of the filing also will be
available for inspection and copying at the principal office of the
Exchange. All comments received will be posted without change; the
Commission does not edit personal identifying information from
submissions. You should submit only information that you wish to make
available publicly. All submissions should refer to File Number SR-
NASDAQ-2010-131 and should be submitted on or before November 16, 2010.

    For the Commission, by the Division of Trading and Markets,
pursuant to delegated authority.\13\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \13\ 17 CFR 200.30-3(a)(12).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

Florence E. Harmon,
Deputy Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2010-27005 Filed 10-25-10; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 8011-01-P


[Federal Register Volume 77, Number 88 (Monday, May 7, 2012)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Pages 26669-26672]
[FR Doc No: 2012-10727]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION

Federal Aviation Administration

14 CFR Part 97

[Docket No. 30839; Amdt. No. 3476 ]

Standard Instrument Approach Procedures, and Takeoff Minimums and
Obstacle Departure Procedures; Miscellaneous Amendments

AGENCY: Federal Aviation Administration (FAA), DOT.

ACTION: Final rule.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: This rule establishes, amends, suspends, or revokes Standard
Instrument Approach Procedures (SIAPs) and associated Takeoff Minimums
and Obstacle Departure Procedures for operations at certain airports.
These regulatory actions are needed because of the adoption of new or
revised criteria, or because of changes occurring in the National
Airspace System, such as the commissioning of new navigational
facilities, adding new obstacles, or changing air traffic requirements.
These changes are designed to provide safe and efficient use of the
navigable airspace and to promote safe flight operations under
instrument flight rules at the affected airports.

DATES: This rule is effective May 7, 2012. The compliance date for each
SIAP, associated Takeoff Minimums, and ODP is specified in the
amendatory provisions.
    The incorporation by reference of certain publications listed in
the regulations is approved by the Director of the Federal Register as
of May 7, 2012.

ADDRESSES: Availability of matters incorporated by reference in the
amendment is as follows:
    For Examination--
    1. FAA Rules Docket, FAA Headquarters Building, 800 Independence
Avenue SW., Washington, DC 20591;
    2. The FAA Regional Office of the region in which the affected
airport is located;
    3. The National Flight Procedures Office, 6500 South MacArthur
Blvd., Oklahoma City, OK 73169 or,
    4. The National Archives and Records Administration (NARA). For
information on the availability of this material at NARA, call 202-741-
6030, or go to: http://www.archives.gov/federal_register/code_of_federal_regulations/ibr_locations.html.
    Availability--All SIAPs and Takeoff Minimums and ODPs are available
online free of charge. Visit http://www.nfdc.faa.gov to register.
Additionally, individual SIAP and Takeoff Minimums and ODP copies may
be obtained from:
    1. FAA Public Inquiry Center (APA-200), FAA Headquarters Building,
800 Independence Avenue SW., Washington, DC 20591; or
    2. The FAA Regional Office of the region in which the affected
airport is located.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Richard A. Dunham III, Flight
Procedure Standards Branch (AFS-420), Flight Technologies and Programs
Divisions, Flight Standards Service, Federal Aviation Administration,
Mike Monroney Aeronautical Center, 6500 South MacArthur Blvd., Oklahoma
City, OK 73169 (Mail Address: P.O. Box 25082, Oklahoma City, OK 73125)
Telephone:<PHONE_NUMBER>.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: This rule amends Title 14 of the Code of
Federal Regulations, Part 97 (14 CFR part 97), by establishing,
amending, suspending, or revoking SIAPS, Takeoff Minimums and/or ODPS.
The complete regulators description of each SIAP and its associated
Takeoff Minimums or ODP for an identified airport is listed on FAA form
documents which are incorporated by reference in this amendment under 5

U.S.C. 552(a), 1 CFR part 51, and 14 CFR part 97.20. The applicable FAA
Forms are FAA Forms 8260-3, 8260-4, 8260-5, 8260-15A, and 8260-15B when
required by an entry on 8260-15A.
    The large number of SIAPs, Takeoff Minimums and ODPs, in addition
to their complex nature and the need for a special format make
publication in the Federal Register expensive and impractical.
Furthermore, airmen do not use the regulatory text of the SIAPs,
Takeoff Minimums or ODPs, but instead refer to their depiction on
charts printed by publishers of aeronautical materials. The advantages
of incorporation by reference are realized and publication of the
complete description of each SIAP, Takeoff Minimums and ODP listed on
FAA forms is unnecessary. This amendment provides the affected CFR
sections and specifies the types of SIAPs and the effective dates of
the, associated Takeoff Minimums and ODPs. This amendment also
identifies the airport and its location, the procedure, and the
amendment number.

The Rule

    This amendment to 14 CFR part 97 is effective upon publication of
each separate SIAP, Takeoff Minimums and ODP as contained in the
transmittal. Some SIAP and Takeoff Minimums and textual ODP amendments
may have been issued previously by the FAA in a Flight Data Center
(FDC) Notice to Airmen (NOTAM) as an emergency action of immediate
flight safety relating directly to published aeronautical charts. The
circumstances which created the need for some SIAP and Takeoff Minimums
and ODP amendments may require making them effective in less than 30
days. For the remaining SIAPS and Takeoff Minimums and ODPS, an
effective date at least 30 days after publication is provided.
    Further, the SIAPs and Takeoff Minimums and ODPS contained in this
amendment are based on the criteria contained in the U.S. Standard for
Terminal Instrument Procedures (TERPS). In developing these SIAPS and
Takeoff Minimums and ODPs, the TERPS criteria were applied to the
conditions existing or anticipated at the affected airports. Because of
the close and immediate relationship between these SIAPs, Takeoff
Minimums and ODPs, and safety in air commerce, I find that notice and
public procedures before adopting these SIAPS, Takeoff Minimums and
ODPs are impracticable and contrary to the public interest and, where
applicable, that good cause exists for making some SIAPs effective in
less than 30 days.

Conclusion

    The FAA has determined that this regulation only involves an
established body of technical regulations for which frequent and
routine amendments are necessary to keep them operationally current.
It, therefore--(1) is not a ``significant regulatory action'' under
Executive Order 12866; (2) is not a ``significant rule'' under DOT
Regulatory Policies and Procedures (44 FR 11034; February 26,1979); and
(3)does not warrant preparation of a regulatory evaluation as the
anticipated impact is so minimal. For the same reason, the FAA
certifies that this amendment will not have a significant economic
impact on a substantial number of small entities under the criteria of
the Regulatory Flexibility Act.

List of Subjects in 14 CFR Part 97

    Air Traffic Control, Airports, Incorporation by reference, and
Navigation (Air).

    Issued in Washington, DC, on April 27, 2012.
Ray Towles,
Deputy Director, Flight Standards Service.

Adoption of the Amendment

    Accordingly, pursuant to the authority delegated to me, Title 14,
Code of Federal Regulations, Part 97 (14 CFR part 97) is amended by
establishing, amending, suspending, or revoking Standard Instrument
Approach Procedures and/or Takeoff Minimums and/or Obstacle Departure
Procedures effective at 0902 UTC on the dates specified, as follows:

PART 97--STANDARD INSTRUMENT APPROACH PROCEDURES

0
1. The authority citation for part 97 continues to read as follows:

    Authority: 49 U.S.C. 106(g), 40103, 40106, 40113, 40114, 40120,
44502, 44514, 44701, 44719, 44721-44722.

0
2. Part 97 is amended to read as follows:

* * * Effective 31 MAY 2012

Anchorage, AK, Ted Stevens Anchorage Intl, ILS RWY 15, Amdt 6
Anchorage, AK, Ted Stevens Anchorage Intl, ILS OR LOC/DME RWY 7L,
ILS RWY 7L (SA CAT I), ILS RWY 7L (SA CAT II), Amdt 3
Anchorage, AK, Ted Stevens Anchorage Intl, ILS OR LOC/DME RWY 7R,
ILS RWY 7R (CAT II), ILS RWY 7R (CAT III), ILS RWY 7R (SA CAT I),
Amdt 3
Oneonta, AL, Robbins Field, RNAV (GPS) RWY 5, Orig
Oneonta, AL, Robbins Field, RNAV (GPS) RWY 23, Orig
Oneonta, AL, Robbins Field, Takeoff Minimums and Obstacle DP, Orig
Prattville, AL, Prattville-Grouby Field, RNAV (GPS) RWY 9, Amdt 2
Prattville, AL, Prattville-Grouby Field, RNAV (GPS) RWY 27, Orig
Camden, AR, Harrell Field, RNAV (GPS) RWY 1, Amdt 1
Camden, AR, Harrell Field, RNAV (GPS) RWY 19, Amdt 1
Camden, AR, Harrell Field, Takeoff Minimums and Obstacle DP, Amdt 1
Phoenix, AZ, Phoenix-Mesa Gateway, RNAV (GPS) Y RWY 30C, Amdt 1
Phoenix, AZ, Phoenix-Mesa Gateway, RNAV (RNP) Z RWY 30C, Orig
Oxford, CT, Waterbury-Oxford, RNAV (GPS) RWY 36, Amdt 2
Windsor Locks, CT, Bradley Intl, RNAV (GPS) Y RWY 24, Amdt 3A
Windsor Locks, CT, Bradley Intl, RNAV (RNP) Z RWY 24, Orig-A
Washington, DC, Washington Dulles Intl, VOR/DME RWY 12, Amdt 9
Apalachicola, FL, Apalachicola Regional, NDB RWY 14, AMDT 2
Apalachicola, FL, Apalachicola Regional, NDB RWY 32, AMDT 2
Apalachicola, FL, Apalachicola Regional, RNAV (GPS) RWY 6, Amdt 1
Apalachicola, FL, Apalachicola Regional, RNAV (GPS) RWY 14, Amdt 2
Apalachicola, FL, Apalachicola Regional, RNAV (GPS) RWY 18, Orig
Apalachicola, FL, Apalachicola Regional, RNAV (GPS) RWY 24, Amdt 1
Apalachicola, FL, Apalachicola Regional, RNAV (GPS) RWY 32, Amdt 2
Apalachicola, FL, Apalachicola Regional, RNAV (GPS) RWY 36, Orig
Apalachicola, FL, Apalachicola Regional, RNAV (GPS)-A, Orig-A,
CANCELLED
Apalachicola, FL, Apalachicola Regional, RNAV (GPS)-B, Orig-A,
CANCELLED
Apalachicola, FL, Apalachicola Regional, Takeoff Minimums and
Obstacle DP, Amdt 1
Fort Pierce, FL, St Lucie County Intl, Takeoff Minimums and Obstacle
DP, Amdt 4
Miami, FL, Miami Intl, ILS OR LOC RWY 8R, Amdt 30B
Panama City, FL, Northwest Florida Beaches Intl, ILS OR LOC/DME RWY
16, Amdt 1
Panama City, FL, Northwest Florida Beaches Intl, RNAV (GPS) RWY 16,
Amdt 1
Panama City, FL, Northwest Florida Beaches Intl, RNAV (GPS) RWY 34,
Amdt 1
Tampa, FL, Peter O Knight, NDB RWY 4, Amdt 12A
Tampa, FL, Peter O Knight, RNAV (GPS) RWY 22, Amdt 2
Tampa, FL, Peter O Knight, RNAV (GPS) RWY 36, Amdt 2A
Tampa, FL, Peter O Knight, Takeoff Minimums and Obstacle DP, Amdt 7
Independence, IA, Independence Muni, RNAV (GPS) RWY 36, Orig-A
Chicago, IL, Chicago O'Hare Intl, ILS OR LOC RWY 9L, ILS RWY 9L (CAT
II), ILS RWY 9L (CAT III), Amdt 1
Chicago, IL, Chicago O'Hare Intl, ILS OR LOC RWY 22L, Amdt 5
Chicago, IL, Chicago O'Hare Intl, ILS OR LOC RWY 22R, Amdt 9
Chicago, IL, Chicago O'Hare Intl, ILS OR LOC RWY 27R, ILS RWY 27R
(CAT II), ILS RWY 27R (CAT III), Amdt 1
Chicago, IL, Chicago O'Hare Intl, LOC RWY 4L, Amdt 22

Chicago, IL, Chicago O'Hare Intl, RNAV (GPS) RWY 4L, Amdt 2
Chicago, IL, Chicago O'Hare Intl, RNAV (GPS) RWY 4R, Amdt 1
Chicago, IL, Chicago O'Hare Intl, RNAV (GPS) RWY 9L, Amdt 1
Chicago, IL, Chicago O'Hare Intl, RNAV (GPS) RWY 10, Amdt 3C
Chicago, IL, Chicago O'Hare Intl, RNAV (GPS) RWY 14L, Amdt 1E
Chicago, IL, Chicago O'Hare Intl, RNAV (GPS) RWY 14R, Amdt 2B
Chicago, IL, Chicago O'Hare Intl, RNAV (GPS) RWY 22L, Amdt 1
Chicago, IL, Chicago O'Hare Intl, RNAV (GPS) RWY 22R, Amdt 2
Chicago, IL, Chicago O'Hare Intl, RNAV (GPS) RWY 27R, Amdt 1
Chicago, IL, Chicago O'Hare Intl, RNAV (GPS) RWY 28, Amdt 2D
Chicago, IL, Chicago O'Hare Intl, RNAV (GPS) Y RWY 22L, Orig-C,
CANCELLED
Wichita, KS, Wichita Mid-Continent, RNAV (GPS) RWY 1R, Amdt 1
Greenville, KY, Muhlenberg County, Takeoff Minimums and Obstacle DP,
Amdt 2
Natchitoches, LA, Natchitoches Rgnl, LOC RWY 35, Amdt 4
Natchitoches, LA, Natchitoches Rgnl, NDB RWY 35, Amdt 6
Natchitoches, LA, Natchitoches Rgnl, RNAV (GPS) RWY 17, Amdt 1
Natchitoches, LA, Natchitoches Rgnl, RNAV (GPS) RWY 35, Amdt 1
Hopedale, MA, Hopedale Industrial Park, GPS-A, Orig-A, CANCELLED
Hopedale, MA, Hopedale Industrial Park, RNAV (GPS)-A, Orig
Orange, MA, Orange Muni, GPS RWY 32, Orig-E, CANCELLED
Orange, MA, Orange Muni, NDB RWY 1, Amdt 1
Orange, MA, Orange Muni, NDB RWY 32, Amdt 1
Orange, MA, Orange Muni, RNAV (GPS) RWY 32, Orig
Orange, MA, Orange Muni, Takeoff Minimums and Obstacle DP, Amdt 1
Gaithersburg, MD, Montgomery County Airpark, RNAV (GPS)-A, Orig
Ridgely, MD, Ridgely Airpark, RNAV (GPS) RWY 12, Orig-A
Ridgely, MD, Ridgely Airpark, RNAV (GPS) RWY 30, Orig-A
Boyne City, MI, Boyne City Muni, RNAV (GPS) RWY 9, Orig
Boyne City, MI, Boyne City Muni, RNAV (GPS) RWY 27, Orig
Boyne City, MI, Boyne City Muni, Takeoff Minimums and Obstacle DP,
Orig
Ontonagon, MI, Ontonagon County-Schuster Field, NDB OR GPS-A, Amdt
4A, CANCELLED
Ontonagon, MI, Ontonagon County-Schuster Field, RNAV (GPS)-A, Orig
Ontonagon, MI, Ontonagon County-Schuster Field, Takeoff Minimums and
Obstacle DP, Amdt 2
Owatonna, MN, Owatonna Degner Rgnl, ILS OR LOC RWY 30, Amdt 2A
Owatonna, MN, Owatonna Degner Rgnl, RNAV (GPS) RWY 12, Amdt 1
Owatonna, MN, Owatonna Degner Rgnl, RNAV (GPS) RWY 30, Orig
Jacksonville, NC, Albert J Ellis, ILS OR LOC RWY 5, Amdt 9
Jacksonville, NC, Albert J Ellis, RNAV (GPS) RWY 5, Amdt 1
Jacksonville, NC, Albert J Ellis, RNAV (GPS) RWY 23, Orig
Pittstown, NJ, Sky Manor, RNAV (GPS) RWY 7, Orig
Pittstown, NJ, Sky Manor, RNAV (GPS) RWY 25, Orig
Pittstown, NJ, Sky Manor, Takeoff Minimums and Obstacle DP, Amdt 2
Pittstown, NJ, Sky Manor, VOR RWY 7, Amdt 3
Robbinsville, NJ, Trenton-Robbinsville, GPS RWY 11, Orig, CANCELLED
Robbinsville, NJ, Trenton-Robbinsville, RNAV (GPS) RWY 11, Orig
Robbinsville, NJ, Trenton-Robbinsville, RNAV (GPS) RWY 29, Amdt 1
Robbinsville, NJ, Trenton-Robbinsville, VOR RWY 29, Amdt 11
Somerville, NJ, Somerset, RNAV (GPS) RWY 30, Amdt 1
Somerville, NJ, Somerset, VOR RWY 8, Amdt 12
Cortland, NY, Cortland County-Chase Field, Takeoff Minimums and
Obstacle DP, Amdt 3
Hornell, NY, Hornell Muni, GPS RWY 18, Orig-B, CANCELLED
Hornell, NY, Hornell Muni, GPS RWY 36, Orig-B, CANCELLED
Hornell, NY, Hornell Muni, RNAV (GPS) RWY 18, Orig
Hornell, NY, Hornell Muni, RNAV (GPS) RWY 36, Orig
Hornell, NY, Hornell Muni, Takeoff Minimums and Obstacle DP, Amdt 5
New York, NY, La Guardia, RNAV (GPS) RWY 13, Amdt 1
Ogdensburg, NY, Ogdensburg Intl, RNAV (GPS) RWY 9, Orig
Westhampton Beach, NY, Francis S Gabreski, COPTER ILS OR LOC RWY 24,
Amdt 2A, CANCELLED
Westhampton Beach, NY, Francis S Gabreski, ILS OR LOC RWY 24, Amdt
10
Westhampton Beach, NY, Francis S Gabreski, RNAV (GPS) RWY 6, Amdt 2
Westhampton Beach, NY, Francis S Gabreski, RNAV (GPS) RWY 24, Amdt 2
Westhampton Beach, NY, Francis S Gabreski, TACAN RYW 6, Orig
Westhampton Beach, NY, Francis S Gabreski, TACAN RWY 24, Orig
Westhampton Beach, NY, Francis S Gabreski, Takeoff Minimums and
Obstacle DP, Amdt 2
Portsmouth, OH, Greater Portsmouth Rgnl, Takeoff Minimums and
Obstacle DP, Amdt 3
Tiffin, OH, Seneca County, RNAV (GPS) RWY 24, Amdt 1
Madras, OR, Madras Municipal, RNAV (GPS) RWY 16, Amdt 1
Madras, OR, Madras Municipal, RNAV (GPS) RWY 34, Orig
Madras, OR, Madras Municipal, RNAV (GPS)-A, Amdt 1, CANCELLED
Danville, PA, Danville, RNAV (GPS) RWY 9, Orig
Danville, PA, Danville, RNAV (GPS) RWY 27, Orig
Danville, PA, Danville, Takeoff Minimums and Obstacle DP, Orig
Lebanon, PA, Keller Brothers, RNAV (GPS) RWY 7, Orig
Lebanon, PA, Keller Brothers, RNAV (GPS) RWY 25, Orig
Lebanon, PA, Keller Brothers, Takeoff Minimums and Obstacle DP, Orig
Philadelphia, PA, Philadelphia Intl, Takeoff Minimums and Obstacle
DP, Amdt 9
Quakertown, PA, Quakertown, NDB RWY 29, Amdt 11
Quakertown, PA, Quakertown, RNAV (GPS) RWY 11, Orig
Quakertown, PA, Quakertown, RNAV (GPS) RWY 29, Amdt 1
Austin, TX, Austin-Bergstrom Intl, ILS OR LOC RWY 17L, ILS RWY 17L
(SA CAT I), ILS RWY 17L (CAT II), ILS RWY 17L (CAT III), Amdt 2
Austin, TX, Austin-Bergstrom Intl, ILS OR LOC RWY 17R, Amdt 4
Austin, TX, Austin-Bergstrom Intl, ILS OR LOC RWY 35L, Amdt 5
Austin, TX, Austin-Bergstrom Intl, ILS OR LOC RWY 35R, Amdt 2
Austin, TX, Austin-Bergstrom Intl, RNAV (GPS) RWY 17L, Amdt 1
Austin, TX, Austin-Bergstrom Intl, RNAV (GPS) RWY 17R, Amdt 1
Austin, TX, Austin-Bergstrom Intl, RNAV (GPS) RWY 35L, Amdt 1
Austin, TX, Austin-Bergstrom Intl, RNAV (GPS) RWY 35R, Amdt 1
Austin, TX, Austin-Bergstrom Intl, RNAV (GPS) Y RWY 35L, Orig,
CANCELLED
Houston, TX, George Bush Intercontinental/Houston, GLS RWY 8L, Orig
Houston, TX, George Bush Intercontinental/Houston, GLS RWY 8R, Orig
Houston, TX, George Bush Intercontinental/Houston, GLS RWY 9, Orig
Houston, TX, George Bush Intercontinental/Houston, GLS RWY 26L, Orig
Houston, TX, George Bush Intercontinental/Houston, GLS RWY 26R, Orig
Houston, TX, George Bush Intercontinental/Houston, GLS RWY 27, Orig
Houston, TX, George Bush Intercontinental/Houston, ILS OR LOC RWY
8L, ILS RWY 8L (CAT II), ILS RWY 8L (CAT III), ILS RWY 8L (SA CAT
I), Amdt 3
Houston, TX, George Bush Intercontinental/Houston, ILS OR LOC RWY
8R, ILS RWY 8R (SA CAT II), Amdt 24
Houston, TX, George Bush Intercontinental/Houston, ILS OR LOC RWY 9,
ILS RWY 9 (SA Cat II), Amdt 9
Houston, TX, George Bush Intercontinental/Houston, RNAV (GPS) RWY
8L, Amdt 4
Houston, TX, George Bush Intercontinental/Houston, RNAV (GPS) RWY 9,
Amdt 4
Houston, TX, George Bush Intercontinental/Houston, RNAV (GPS) RWY
26L, Amdt 3A
Houston, TX, George Bush Intercontinental/Houston, RNAV (GPS) RWY
26R, Amdt 3A
Houston, TX, George Bush Intercontinental/Houston, RNAV (GPS) Z RWY
8R, Amdt 3
Houston, TX, George Bush Intercontinental/Houston, RNAV (RNP) Y RWY
8R, Orig
Houston, TX, George Bush Intercontinental/Houston, RNAV (RNP) Y RWY
27, Orig
Madisonville, TX, Madisonville Muni, Takeoff Minimums and Obstacle
DP, Orig
Monahans, TX, Roy Hurd Memorial, Takeoff Minimums and Obstacle DP,
Amdt 1
Clarksville, VA, Lake Country Regional, GPS RWY 4, Orig-B, CANCELLED
Clarksville, VA, Lake Country Regional, RNAV (GPS) RWY 4, Orig

Clarksville, VA, Lake Country Regional, RNAV (GPS) RWY 22, Orig
Leesburg, VA, Leesburg Executive, ILS OR LOC RWY 17, Amdt 1
Leesburg, VA, Leesburg Executive, RNAV (GPS) RWY 17, Amdt 3
New Market, VA, New Market, Takeoff Minimums and Obstacle DP, Orig
Norfolk, VA, Norfolk Intl, ILS OR LOC RWY 5, Amdt 26A
Newport, VT, Newport State, GPS RWY 36, Orig-A, CANCELLED
Newport, VT, Newport State, RNAV (GPS) RWY 36, Orig
Guernsey, WY, Camp Guernsey, GPS RWY 32, Orig, CANCELLED
Guernsey, WY, Camp Guernsey, NDB RWY 32, Amdt 1
Guernsey, WY, Camp Guernsey, RNAV (GPS) RWY 32, Orig
Torrington, WY, Torrington Muni, NDB RWY 10, Amdt 2
Torrington, WY, Torrington Muni, NDB RWY 28, Amdt 2

    RESCINDED: On March 28, 2012 (77 FR 18683), the FAA published an
Amendment in Docket No. 30833, Amdt No. 3470 to Part 97 of the
Federal Aviation Regulations under section 97.33. The following 46
entries for Denver, CO, and 1 entry for Camden, AR, effective 31
May, 2012, are hereby rescinded in their entirety:

Camden, AR, Harrell Field, VOR/DME RWY 1, Amdt 10
Denver, CO, Centennial, Takeoff Minimums and Obstacle DP, Amdt 5
Denver, CO, Denver Intl, ILS OR LOC RWY 7, Amdt 3
Denver, CO, Denver Intl, ILS OR LOC RWY 8, Amdt 5
Denver, CO, Denver Intl, ILS OR LOC RWY 16L, Amdt 3
Denver, CO, Denver Intl, ILS OR LOC RWY 16R, Amdt 1
Denver, CO, Denver Intl, ILS OR LOC RWY 17L, Amdt 4
Denver, CO, Denver Intl, ILS OR LOC RWY 17R, Amdt 3
Denver, CO, Denver Intl, ILS OR LOC RWY 25, Amdt 3
Denver, CO, Denver Intl, ILS OR LOC RWY 26, Amdt 3
Denver, CO, Denver Intl, ILS OR LOC RWY 34L, ILS RWY 34L (CAT II),
ILS RWY 34L (CAT III), ILS RWY 34L (SA CAT I), Amdt 2
Denver, CO, Denver Intl, ILS OR LOC RWY 34R, ILS RWY 34R (CAT II),
ILS RWY 34R (CAT III), ILS RWY 34R (SA CAT I), Amdt 3
Denver, CO, Denver Intl, ILS OR LOC RWY 35L, ILS RWY 35L (CAT II),
ILS RWY 35L (CAT III), ILS RWY 35L (SA CAT I), Amdt 5
Denver, CO, Denver Intl, ILS OR LOC RWY 35R, ILS RWY 35R (CAT II),
ILS RWY 35R (CAT III), ILS RWY 35R (SA CAT I), Amdt 3
Denver, CO, Denver Intl, RNAV (GPS) Y RWY 7, Amdt 1
Denver, CO, Denver Intl, RNAV (GPS) Y RWY 8, Amdt 1
Denver, CO, Denver Intl, RNAV (GPS) Y RWY 16L, Amdt 1
Denver, CO, Denver Intl, RNAV (GPS) Y RWY 16R, Amdt 1
Denver, CO, Denver Intl, RNAV (GPS) Y RWY 17L, Amdt 1
Denver, CO, Denver Intl, RNAV (GPS) Y RWY 17R, Amdt 1
Denver, CO, Denver Intl, RNAV (GPS) Y RWY 25, Amdt 1
Denver, CO, Denver Intl, RNAV (GPS) Y RWY 26, Amdt 1
Denver, CO, Denver Intl, RNAV (GPS) Y RWY 34L, Amdt 2
Denver, CO, Denver Intl, RNAV (GPS) Y RWY 34R, Amdt 2
Denver, CO, Denver Intl, RNAV (GPS) Y RWY 35L, Amdt 2
Denver, CO, Denver Intl, RNAV (GPS) Y RWY 35R, Amdt 2
Denver, CO, Denver Intl, RNAV (RNP) Z RWY 7, Orig
Denver, CO, Denver Intl, RNAV (RNP) Z RWY 8, Orig
Denver, CO, Denver Intl, RNAV (RNP) Z RWY 16L, Orig
Denver, CO, Denver Intl, RNAV (RNP) Z RWY 16R, Orig
Denver, CO, Denver Intl, RNAV (RNP) Z RWY 17L, Orig
Denver, CO, Denver Intl, RNAV (RNP) Z RWY 17R, Orig
Denver, CO, Denver Intl, RNAV (RNP) Z RWY 25, Orig
Denver, CO, Denver Intl, RNAV (RNP) Z RWY 26, Orig
Denver, CO, Denver Intl, RNAV (RNP) Z RWY 34L, Orig
Denver, CO, Denver Intl, RNAV (RNP) Z RWY 34R, Orig
Denver, CO, Denver Intl, RNAV (RNP) Z RWY 35L, Orig
Denver, CO, Denver Intl, RNAV (RNP) Z RWY 35R, Orig
Denver, CO, Front Range, ILS OR LOC RWY 17, Amdt 1
Denver, CO, Front Range, ILS OR LOC RWY 26, Amdt 5
Denver, CO, Front Range, ILS OR LOC RWY 35, Amdt 1
Denver, CO, Front Range, NDB RWY 26, Amdt 5
Denver, CO, Front Range, RNAV (GPS) RWY 17, Amdt 1
Denver, CO, Front Range, RNAV (GPS) RWY 26, Amdt 1
Denver, CO, Front Range, RNAV (GPS) RWY 35, Amdt 1
Denver, CO, Front Range, Takeoff Minimums and Obstacle DP, Amdt 3
Denver, CO, Rocky Mountain Metropolitan, Takeoff Minimums and
Obstacle DP, Amdt 5

[FR Doc. 2012-10727 Filed 5-4-12; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910-13-P


P-16-0326 Sanitized Support Documents Index:
 P-16-0326 Sanitized Determination Document (linked)
 P-16-0326 Sanitized CHEM Report (attached)
 P-16-0326 Sanitized ECO Report (attached)
 P-16-0326 Sanitized ENG Report (attached)
 P-16-0326 Sanitized EXP Report (attached)
 P-16-0326 Sanitized Fate Report (attached)
 P-16-0326 Sanitized HLTH Report_POST-FOCUS FINAL (attached)