[Federal Register: May 18, 2010 (Volume 75, Number 95)]
[Notices]
[Page 27847]
[DOCID:fr18my10-132]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

[File No. 500-1]

Broadengate Systems, Inc., (n/k/a Otter Lake Resources, Inc.);
Order of Suspension of Trading

May 14, 2010.
    It appears to the Securities and Exchange Commission that there is
a lack of current and accurate information concerning the securities of
Broadengate Systems, Inc. (n/k/a Otter Lake Resources, Inc.) because it
has not filed any periodic reports since the period ended September 30,
2002.
    The Commission is of the opinion that the public interest and the
protection of investors require a suspension of trading in the
securities of the above-listed company. Therefore, it is ordered,
pursuant to Section 12(k) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, that
trading in the securities of the above-listed company is suspended for
the period from 9:30 a.m. EDT on May 14, 2010 and terminating at 11:59
p.m. EDT on May 27, 2010.

    By the Commission.
Jill M. Peterson,
Assistant Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2010-11953 Filed 5-14-10; 11:15 am]
BILLING CODE 8011-01-P


[Federal Register: December 4, 2009 (Volume 74, Number 232)]
[Notices]
[Page 63758]
[DOCID:fr04de09-86]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES

Food and Drug Administration

[Docket No. FDA-2009-D-0539]

Draft Guidance for Industry on Assay Development for
Immunogenicity Testing of Therapeutic Proteins; Availability

AGENCY: Food and Drug Administration, HHS.

ACTION: Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Food and Drug Administration (FDA) is announcing the
availability of a draft guidance for industry entitled ``Assay
Development for Immunogenicity Testing of Therapeutic Proteins.'' The
draft guidance provides recommendations to facilitate industry's
development of immune assays for assessment of the immunogenicity of
therapeutic proteins during clinical trials.

DATES: Submit written or electronic comments on the draft guidance by
February 2, 2010. General comments on agency guidance documents are
welcome at any time.

ADDRESSES: Submit written requests for single copies of the draft
guidance to the Division of Drug Information, Center for Drug
Evaluation and Research, Food and Drug Administration, 10903 New
Hampshire Ave., Bldg. 51, rm. 2201, Silver Spring, MD 20993-0002;
Office of Communication, Outreach, and Development (HFM-40), Center for
Biologics Evaluation and Research, Food and Drug Administration, 1401
Rockville Pike, Rockville, MD 20852-1448. Send one self-addressed
adhesive label to assist that office in processing your requests.
Submit written comments on the draft guidance to the Division of
Dockets Management (HFA-305), Food and Drug Administration, 5630
Fishers Lane, rm. 1061, Rockville, MD 20852. Submit electronic comments
to http://www.fda.gov/dockets/ecomments. See the SUPPLEMENTARY
INFORMATION section for electronic access to the draft guidance
document.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
    Susan Kirshner, Center for Drug Evaluation and Research (HFD-122),
Food and Drug Administration, 8800 Rockville Pike, Bldg. N29A, rm.
2D16, Bethesda, MD 20892,<PHONE_NUMBER>; or
    Stephen Ripley, Center for Biologics Evaluation and Research (HFM-
17), Food and Drug Administration, 1401 Rockville Pike, Suite 200N,
Rockville, MD 20852-1448,<PHONE_NUMBER>.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

I. Background

    FDA is announcing the availability of a draft guidance for industry
entitled ``Assay Development for Immunogenicity Testing of Therapeutic
Proteins.'' This guidance was created by a working group that consisted
of staff from the Center for Drug Evaluation and Research (CDER) and
the Center for Biologics Evaluation and Research (CBER). Because
clinicians rely on the observed immunogenicity rates listed in the
``Immunogenicity'' section of drug labeling, development of validated,
sensitive immune assays is critical to patient care. This guidance
discusses immunogenicity testing during drug product development and
provides recommendations on assay development, clinical aspects of
assay validation, assay validation, assay testing implementation, and
other aspects of immunogenicity testing.
    This draft guidance is being issued consistent with FDA's good
guidance practices regulation (21 CFR 10.115). The draft guidance, when
finalized, will represent the agency's current thinking on the
development of immune assays for assessment of the immunogenicity of
therapeutic proteins during clinical trials. It does not create or
confer any rights for or on any person and does not operate to bind FDA
or the public. An alternative approach may be used if such approach
satisfies the requirements of the applicable statutes and regulations.

II. Comments

    Interested persons may submit to the Division of Dockets Management
(see ADDRESSES) written or electronic comments regarding this document.
Submit a single copy of electronic comments or two paper copies of any
mailed comments, except that individuals may submit one paper copy.
Comments are to be identified with the docket number found in brackets
in the heading of this document. Received comments may be seen in the
Division of Dockets Management between 9 a.m. and 4 p.m., Monday
through Friday.

III. Electronic Access

    Persons with access to the Internet may obtain the document at
either http://www.fda.gov/Drugs/
GuidanceComplianceRegulatoryInformation/Guidances/default.htm or http:/
/www.regulations.gov.

    Dated: December 1, 2009.
David Horowitz,
Assistant Commissioner for Policy.
[FR Doc. E9-28960 Filed 12-3-09; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4160-01-S


[Federal Register: October 22, 2010 (Volume 75, Number 204)]
[Notices]
[Page 65366]
[DOCID:fr22oc10-97]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY

Federal Emergency Management Agency

[Docket ID FEMA-2010-0063]

Recovery Policy RP9524.2, Landslides and Slope Stability Related
to Public Facilities

AGENCY: Federal Emergency Management Agency, DHS.

ACTION: Notice of availability.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: This document provides notice of the final Recovery Policy
RP9524.2, Landslides and Slope Stability Related to Public Facilities,
which is being issued by the Federal Emergency Management Agency
(FEMA).

DATES: This policy is effective October 8, 2010.

ADDRESSES: This final policy is available online at http://
www.regulations.gov under docket ID FEMA-2010-0063 and on FEMA's Web
site at http://www.fema.gov. You may also view a hard copy of the final
policy at the Office of Chief Counsel, Federal Emergency Management
Agency, Room 835, 500 C Street, SW., Washington, DC 20472-3100.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Byron Mason, Federal Emergency
Management Agency, 500 C Street, SW., Washington, DC 20472, phone 202-
646-4368, e-mail<EMAIL_ADDRESS>
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: This policy determines the eligibility of
emergency work to protect eligible facilities threatened by landslides
or slope failures; as well as the eligibility of permanent repairs to
eligible facilities damaged by landslides or slopes that failed during
an event that resulted in a Presidentially-declared emergency or major
disaster.

    Authority:  42 U.S.C. 5121-5207.

Robert Farmer,
Deputy Director, Office of Policy and Program Analysis, Federal
Emergency Management Agency.
[FR Doc. 2010-26703 Filed 10-21-10; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 9111-23-P


[Federal Register: April 6, 2009 (Volume 74, Number 64)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Page 15371-15373]
[DOCID:fr06ap09-4]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION

Federal Aviation Administration

14 CFR Part 39

[Docket No. FAA-2009-0125 Directorate Identifier 2009-CE-002-AD;
Amendment 39-15873; AD 2009-07-14]
RIN 2120-AA64

Airworthiness Directives; Diamond Aircraft Industries GmbH Model
DA 40 and DA 40F Airplanes

AGENCY: Federal Aviation Administration (FAA), Department of
Transportation (DOT).

ACTION: Final Rule.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: We are adopting a new airworthiness directive (AD) for the
products listed above. This AD results from mandatory continuing
airworthiness information (MCAI) issued by an aviation authority of
another country to identify and correct an unsafe condition on an
aviation product. The MCAI describes the unsafe condition as:

    A number of wings manufactured by Diamond Aircraft Industries
Inc. in Canada have been found to exhibit voids in the adhesive
joint between the main spar caps and the upper wing skins. The
available information indicates that wings with voids continue to
meet the certification design limits, provided the voids are within
established criteria. However, to detect any wings that may have
voids exceeding these criteria, Diamond has issued Mandatory Service
Bulletin MSB-40-060 and MSB-F4-016 (single document) that describes
instructions for inspection of the aircraft that had these wings
installed during manufacture. Aircraft that have voids within the
inspection criteria may continue to operate without restriction,
pending the outcome of ongoing investigations. Aircraft that have
voids exceeding the inspection criteria must be repaired.

We are issuing this AD to require actions to correct the unsafe
condition on these products.

DATES: This AD becomes effective May 11, 2009.
    On May 11, 2009, the Director of the Federal Register approved the
incorporation by reference of certain publications listed in this AD.

ADDRESSES: You may examine the AD docket on the Internet at http://
www.regulations.gov or in person at Document Management Facility, U.S.
Department of Transportation, Docket Operations, M-30, West Building
Ground Floor, Room W12-140, 1200 New Jersey Avenue, SE., Washington, DC
20590.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Sarjapur Nagarajan, Aerospace
Engineer, FAA, Small Airplane Directorate, 901 Locust, Room 301, Kansas
City, Missouri 64106; telephone:<PHONE_NUMBER>; fax:<PHONE_NUMBER>.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

Discussion

    We issued a notice of proposed rulemaking (NPRM) to amend 14 CFR
part 39 to include an AD that would apply to the specified products.
That NPRM was published in the Federal Register on February 13, 2009
(74 FR 7196). That NPRM proposed to correct an unsafe condition for the
specified products. The MCAI states:

    A number of wings manufactured by Diamond Aircraft Industries
Inc. in Canada have been found to exhibit voids in the adhesive
joint between the main spar caps and the upper wing skins. The
available information indicates that wings with voids continue to
meet the certification design limits, provided the voids are within
established criteria. However, to detect any wings that may have
voids exceeding these criteria, Diamond has issued Mandatory Service
Bulletin MSB-40-060 and MSB-F4-016 (single document) that describes
instructions for inspection of the aircraft that had these wings
installed during manufacture. Aircraft that have voids within

the inspection criteria may continue to operate without restriction,
pending the outcome of ongoing investigations. Aircraft that have
voids exceeding the inspection criteria must be repaired.
    For the reasons described above, this EASA AD requires the
inspection of the affected aircraft to measure the voids in the
adhesive joint between the main spar caps and the upper wing skin,
the reporting of all findings to Diamond Aircraft industries and the
repair of any voids exceeding the criteria as specified in the MSB.

Comments

    We gave the public the opportunity to participate in developing
this AD. We received no comments on the NPRM or on the determination of
the cost to the public.

Conclusion

    We reviewed the available data and determined that air safety and
the public interest require adopting the AD as proposed.

Differences Between This AD and the MCAI or Service Information

    We have reviewed the MCAI and related service information and, in
general, agree with their substance. But we might have found it
necessary to use different words from those in the MCAI to ensure the
AD is clear for U.S. operators and is enforceable. In making these
changes, we do not intend to differ substantively from the information
provided in the MCAI and related service information.
    We might also have required different actions in this AD from those
in the MCAI in order to follow FAA policies. Any such differences are
highlighted in a NOTE within the AD.

Costs of Compliance

    Based on the service information, we estimate that this AD will
affect 649 products of U.S. registry. We also estimate that it will
take about 2 work-hours per product to comply with the basic
requirements of this AD. The average labor rate is $80 per work-hour.
    Based on these figures, we estimate the cost of this AD to the U.S.
operators to be $103,840 or $160 per product.
    We have no way of determining the cost of any necessary repairs or
parts that may be required as a result of any proposed inspection.

Authority for This Rulemaking

    Title 49 of the United States Code specifies the FAA's authority to
issue rules on aviation safety. Subtitle I, section 106, describes the
authority of the FAA Administrator. ``Subtitle VII: Aviation
Programs,'' describes in more detail the scope of the Agency's
authority.
    We are issuing this rulemaking under the authority described in
``Subtitle VII, Part A, Subpart III, Section 44701: General
Requirements.'' Under that section, Congress charges the FAA with
promoting safe flight of civil aircraft in air commerce by prescribing
regulations for practices, methods, and procedures the Administrator
finds necessary for safety in air commerce. This regulation is within
the scope of that authority because it addresses an unsafe condition
that is likely to exist or develop on products identified in this
rulemaking action.

Regulatory Findings

    We determined that this AD will not have federalism implications
under Executive Order 13132. This AD will not have a substantial direct
effect on the States, on the relationship between the national
government and the States, or on the distribution of power and
responsibilities among the various levels of government.
    For the reasons discussed above, I certify this AD:
    (1) Is not a ``significant regulatory action'' under Executive
Order 12866;
    (2) Is not a ``significant rule'' under DOT Regulatory Policies and
Procedures (44 FR 11034, February 26, 1979); and
    (3) Will not have a significant economic impact, positive or
negative, on a substantial number of small entities under the criteria
of the Regulatory Flexibility Act.
    We prepared a regulatory evaluation of the estimated costs to
comply with this AD and placed it in the AD Docket.

Examining the AD Docket

    You may examine the AD docket on the Internet at http://
www.regulations.gov; or in person at the Docket Management Facility
between 9 a.m. and 5 p.m., Monday through Friday, except Federal
holidays. The AD docket contains the NPRM, the regulatory evaluation,
any comments received, and other information. The street address for
the Docket Office (telephone<PHONE_NUMBER>) is in the ADDRESSES
section. Comments will be available in the AD docket shortly after
receipt.

List of Subjects in 14 CFR Part 39

    Air transportation, Aircraft, Aviation safety, Incorporation by
reference, Safety.

Adoption of the Amendment

0
Accordingly, under the authority delegated to me by the Administrator,
the FAA amends 14 CFR part 39 as follows:

PART 39--AIRWORTHINESS DIRECTIVES

0
1. The authority citation for part 39 continues to read as follows:

    Authority: 49 U.S.C. 106(g), 40113, 44701.

Sec.  39.13  [Amended]

0
2. The FAA amends Sec.  39.13 by adding the following new AD:

2009-07-14 Diamond Aircraft Industries GmbH: Amendment 39-15873;
Docket No. FAA-2009-0125; Directorate Identifier 2009-CE-002-AD.

Effective Date

    (a) This airworthiness directive (AD) becomes effective May 11,
2009.

Affected ADs

    (b) None.

Applicability

    (c) This AD applies to the following model and serial number
airplanes, certificated in any category: DA 40 airplanes, serial
numbers 40.377, 40.420, 40.422, 40.644 through 40.693, 40.695
through 40.842, 40.844, 40.846 through 40.887, 40.889 through
40.912, 40.915 through 40.917, 40.919 through 40.929, 40.931,
40.932, 40.934 through 40.940, 40.944 through 40.949, 40.951 through
40.953, 40.955 through 40.957, 40.961, 40.964, and 40.971; and DA
40F airplanes, serial numbers 40.FC007 through 40.FC029.

Subject

    (d) Air Transport Association of America (ATA) Code 57: Wings.

Reason

    (e) The mandatory continuing airworthiness information (MCAI)
states:

    A number of wings manufactured by Diamond Aircraft Industries
Inc. in Canada have been found to exhibit voids in the adhesive
joint between the main spar caps and the upper wing skins. The
available information indicates that wings with voids continue to
meet the certification design limits, provided the voids are within
established criteria. However, to detect any wings that may have
voids exceeding these criteria, Diamond has issued Mandatory Service
Bulletin MSB-40-060 and MSB-F4-016 (single document) that describes
instructions for inspection of the aircraft that had these wings
installed during manufacture. Aircraft that have voids within the
inspection criteria may continue to operate without restriction,
pending the outcome of ongoing investigations. Aircraft that have
voids exceeding the inspection criteria must be repaired.
    For the reasons described above, this EASA AD requires the
inspection of the affected aircraft to measure the voids in the
adhesive joint between the main spar caps and the upper wing skin,
the reporting of all findings to Diamond Aircraft industries and the
repair of any voids exceeding the criteria as specified in the MSB.

Actions and Compliance

    (f) Unless already done, do the following actions:
    (1) Within the next 100 hours time-in-service (TIS) after May
11, 2009 (the effective date of this AD) or within the next 3 months
after May 11, 2009 (the effective date of this AD), whichever occurs
first, inspect the adhesive joint between the wing main spar caps
and the upper wing skin for adhesive voids following Diamond
Aircraft Industries GmbH Work Instructions WI-MSB-40-060 and WI-MSB-
F4-016 (single document), dated October 20, 2008; as referenced in
Diamond Aircraft Industries GmbH Mandatory Service Bulletins No.
MSB-40-060 and No. MSB-F4-016 (single document), dated October 20,
2008.
    (2) Within the next 30 days after the inspection required in
paragraph (f)(1) of this AD or within 30 days after May 11, 2009
(the effective date of this AD), whichever occurs later, report the
results to Diamond Aircraft Industries following Diamond Aircraft
Industries GmbH Work Instructions WI-MSB-40-060 and WI-MSB-F4-016
(single document), dated October 20, 2008; as referenced in Diamond
Aircraft Industries GmbH Mandatory Service Bulletins No. MSB-40-060
and No. MSB-F4-016 (single document), dated October 20, 2008.
    (3) If, as a result of the inspection required by paragraph
(f)(1) of this AD, an adhesive void is found that exceeds the
criteria specified in the service information, before further
flight, contact Diamond Aircraft Industries at Diamond Aircraft
Industries GmbH, N.A. Otto-Stra[szlig]e 5, A-2700 Wiener Neustadt;
telephone: +43 2622 26700; fax: +43 2622 26780; E-mail:
<EMAIL_ADDRESS>for FAA-approved repair instructions and
accomplish the repair accordingly.

FAA AD Differences

    Note: This AD differs from the MCAI and/or service information
as follows: No differences.

Other FAA AD Provisions

    (g) The following provisions also apply to this AD:
    (1) Alternative Methods of Compliance (AMOCs): The Manager,
Standards Office, FAA, has the authority to approve AMOCs for this
AD, if requested using the procedures found in 14 CFR 39.19. Send
information to ATTN: Sarjapur Nagarajan, Aerospace Engineer, FAA,
Small Airplane Directorate, 901 Locust, Room 301, Kansas City,
Missouri 64106; telephone:<PHONE_NUMBER>; fax:<PHONE_NUMBER>.
Before using any approved AMOC on any airplane to which the AMOC
applies, notify your appropriate principal inspector (PI) in the FAA
Flight Standards District Office (FSDO), or lacking a PI, your local
FSDO.
    (2) Airworthy Product: For any requirement in this AD to obtain
corrective actions from a manufacturer or other source, use these
actions if they are FAA-approved. Corrective actions are considered
FAA-approved if they are approved by the State of Design Authority
(or their delegated agent). You are required to assure the product
is airworthy before it is returned to service.
    (3) Reporting Requirements: For any reporting requirement in
this AD, under the provisions of the Paperwork Reduction Act (44
U.S.C. 3501 et seq.), the Office of Management and Budget (OMB) has
approved the information collection requirements and has assigned
OMB Control Number 2120-0056.

Related Information

    (h) Refer to MCAI European Aviation Safety Agency (EASA) AD No.:
2008-0224, dated December 16, 2008; and Diamond Aircraft Industries
GmbH Mandatory Service Bulletins No. MSB-40-060 and No. MSB-F4-016
(single document), dated October 20, 2008, for related information.

Material Incorporated by Reference

    (i) You must use Diamond Aircraft Industries GmbH Work
Instructions WI-MSB-40-060 and WI-MSB-F4-016 (single document),
dated October 20, 2008; and Diamond Aircraft Industries GmbH
Mandatory Service Bulletins No. MSB-40-060 and No. MSB-F4-016
(single document), dated October 20, 2008, to do the actions
required by this AD, unless the AD specifies otherwise.
    (1) The Director of the Federal Register approved the
incorporation by reference of this service information under 5
U.S.C. 552(a) and 1 CFR part 51.
    (2) For service information identified in this AD, contact
Diamond Aircraft Industries GmbH, N.A. Otto-Stra[szlig]e 5, A-2700
Wiener Neustadt; telephone: +43 2622 26700; fax: +43 2622 26780; e-
mail<EMAIL_ADDRESS>Internet: http://www.diamond-air.at/.
    (3) You may review copies of the service information
incorporated by reference for this AD at the FAA, Central Region,
Office of the Regional Counsel, 901 Locust, Kansas City, Missouri
64106. For information on the availability of this material at the
Central Region, call<PHONE_NUMBER>.
    (4) You may also review copies of the service information
incorporated by reference for this AD at the National Archives and
Records Administration (NARA). For information on the availability
of this material at NARA, call<PHONE_NUMBER>, or go to: http://
www.archives.gov/federal_register/code_of_federal_regulations/
ibr_locations.html.

    Issued in Kansas City, Missouri, on March 27, 2009.
John R. Colomy,
Acting Manager, Small Airplane Directorate, Aircraft Certification
Service.
[FR Doc. E9-7412 Filed 4-3-09; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4910-13-P


[Federal Register: March 20, 2009 (Volume 74, Number 53)]
[Notices]
[Page 11987-11988]
[DOCID:fr20mr09-114]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION

Federal Aviation Administration

RTCA Government/Industry Air Traffic Management Advisory
Committee

AGENCY: Federal Aviation Administration (FAA), DOT.

ACTION: Notice of RTCA Government/Industry Air Traffic Management
Advisory Committee.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The FAA is issuing this notice to advise the public of a
meeting of RTCA Government/Industry Air Traffic Management Advisory
Committee.

DATES: The meeting will be held March 16, 2009, from 1 p.m. to 4 p.m.

ADDRESSES: The meeting will be held at FAA Headquarters, 800
Independence Avenue, SW., Bessie Coleman Conference Center (2nd Floor),
Washington, DC 20591.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: RTCA Secretariat, 1828 L Street, NW.,
Suite 805, Washington, DC 20036; telephone<PHONE_NUMBER>; fax (202)
833-9434; Web site http://www.rtca.org. METRO: L'Enfant Plaza Station
(Use 7th & Maryland Exit)

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Pursuant to section 10(a)(2) of the Federal
Advisory Committee Act (Pub. L. 92-463, 5 U.S.C., Appendix 2), notice
is hereby given for the Air Traffic Management Advisory Committee
meeting. The agenda will include:
     Opening Plenary (Welcome and Introductions);
     Report from RTCA Task Force on NextGen Mid-Term
Implementation (NextGen TF);
     ATMAC Member Discussion and Recommendations;
     Closing Plenary (Other Business, Member Discussion,
Adjourn).
    Attendance is open to the interested public but limited to space
availability.

With the approval of the chairmen, members of the public may present
oral statements at the meeting. Persons wishing to present statements
or obtain information should contact the person listed in the FOR
FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT section. Members of the public may present
a written statement to the committee at any time.

    Issued in Washington, DC, on March 16, 2009.
Francisco Estrada C.,
RTCA Advisory Committee.
[FR Doc. E9-6176 Filed 3-19-09; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4910-13-P


[Federal Register: August 3, 2009 (Volume 74, Number 147)]
[Proposed Rules]
[Page 38385-38386]
[DOCID:fr03au09-19]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY

40 CFR Part 62

[EPA-R03-OAR-2009-0463; FRL-8938-9]

Approval and Promulgation of State Air Quality Plans for
Designated Facilities and Pollutants; West Virginia; Control of
Emissions From Existing Hospital/Medical/Infectious Waste Incinerator
Units, Plan Revision

AGENCY: Environmental Protection Agency (EPA).

ACTION: Proposed rule.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: EPA proposes to approve a revision to the West Virginia (WV)
hospital/medical/infectious waste incinerator (HMIWI) 111(d)/129 plan
(the ``plan''). The revision contains a modified WV Department of
Environmental Protection, Division of Air Quality (DAQ) rule,
WV45CSR18, that streamlines and consolidates the state's regulatory
structure for incinerator units into one rule which incorporates Clean
Air Act (CAA), section 129, requirements. This approval action relates
only to HMIWI units. In the Final Rules section of this Federal
Register, EPA is approving the State of West Virginia's HMIWI plan
revision submittal as a direct final rule without prior proposal
because the Agency views this as a noncontroversial action and
anticipates no adverse comments. A detailed rationale for the approval
is set forth in the direct final rule. If no adverse comments are
received in response to this action, no further activity is
contemplated. If EPA receives adverse comments, the direct final rule
will be withdrawn and all public comments received will be addressed in
a subsequent final rule based on this proposed rule. EPA will not
institute a second comment period. Any parties interested in commenting
on this action should do so at this time.

DATES: Comments must be received in writing by September 2, 2009.

ADDRESSES: Submit your comments, identified by Docket ID Number EPA-
R03-OAR-2009-0463 by one of the following methods:
    A. http://www.regulations.gov. Follow the on-line instructions for
submitting comments.
    B. E-mail<EMAIL_ADDRESS>    C. Mail: EPA-R03-OAR-2009-0463, Walter Wilkie, Chief, Air Quality
Analysis Branch, Mailcode 3AP22, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency,
Region III, 1650 Arch Street, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania 19103.
    D. Hand Delivery: At the previously-listed EPA Region III address.
Such deliveries are only accepted during the Docket's normal hours of
operation, and special arrangements should be made for deliveries of
boxed information.
    Instructions: Direct your comments to Docket ID No. EPA-R03-OAR-
2009-0463. EPA's policy is that all comments received will be included
in the public docket without change, and may be made available online
at http://www.regulations.gov, including any personal information
provided, unless the comment includes information claimed to be
Confidential Business Information (CBI) or other information whose
disclosure is restricted by statute. Do not submit information that you
consider to be CBI or otherwise protected through http://
www.regulations.gov or e-mail.
    The http://www.regulations.gov Web site is an ``anonymous access''
system, which means EPA will not know your

identity or contact information unless you provide it in the body of
your comment. If you send an e-mail comment directly to EPA without
going through http://www.regulations.gov, your e-mail address will be
automatically captured and included as part of the comment that is
placed in the public docket and made available on the Internet. If you
submit an electronic comment, EPA recommends that you include your name
and other contact information in the body of your comment and with any
disk or CD-ROM you submit. If EPA cannot read your comment due to
technical difficulties and cannot contact you for clarification, EPA
may not be able to consider your comment. Electronic files should avoid
the use of special characters, any form of encryption, and be free of
any defects or viruses.
    Docket: All documents in the electronic docket are listed in the
http:[sol][sol]www.regulations.gov index. Although listed in the index,
some information is not publicly available, i.e., CBI or other
information whose disclosure is restricted by statute. Certain other
material, such as copyrighted material, is not placed on the Internet
and will be publicly available only in hard copy form. Publicly
available docket materials are available either electronically in
http://www.regulations.gov or in hard copy during normal business hours
at the Air Protection Division, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency,
Region III, 1650 Arch Street, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania 19103. Copies
of the State submittal are available at the West Virginia Division of
Air Quality, 601 57th Street, SE., Charleston, West Virginia 25304.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: James B. Topsale, P.E., at (215) 814-
2190, or by e-mail at<EMAIL_ADDRESS>Please note that while
questions may be posed via phone and e-mail, formal comments must be
submitted in writing, as indicated in the ADDRESSES section of this
document.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: For further information, please see the
information provided in the direct final action, with the same title,
that is located in the ``Rules and Regulations'' section of this
Federal Register publication.

    Dated: July 21, 2009.
William C. Early,
Acting Regional Administrator, EPA Region III.
[FR Doc. E9-18481 Filed 7-31-09; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 6560-50-P


[Federal Register: March 13, 2008 (Volume 73, Number 50)]
[Proposed Rules]
[Page 13492-13494]
[DOCID:fr13mr08-17]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION

Federal Aviation Administration

14 CFR Part 39

[Docket No. FAA-2008-0295; Directorate Identifier 2007-NM-298-AD]
RIN 2120-AA64

Airworthiness Directives; Boeing Model 757 Airplanes

AGENCY: Federal Aviation Administration (FAA), DOT.

ACTION: Notice of proposed rulemaking (NPRM).

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: We propose to adopt a new airworthiness directive (AD) for all
Boeing Model 757-200, -200PF, -200CB, and -300 series airplanes. This
proposed AD would require an inspection of the two spring arms in the
spin brake assemblies in the nose wheel well to determine if the spring
arms are made of aluminum or composite material, and repetitive related
investigative/corrective actions if necessary. This proposed AD results
from reports of cracked and broken aluminum spring arms. We are
proposing this AD to detect and correct cracked or broken spring arms.
A cracked or broken spring arm could separate from the airplane and
result in potential hazard to persons or property on the ground, or
ingestion into the engine with engine damage and potential shutdown, or
damage to the airplane.

DATES: We must receive comments on this proposed AD by April 28, 2008.

ADDRESSES: You may send comments by any of the following methods:
     Federal eRulemaking Portal: Go to http://
www.regulations.gov. Follow the instructions for submitting comments.
     Fax:<PHONE_NUMBER>.
     Mail: U.S. Department of Transportation, Docket
Operations, M-30, West Building Ground Floor, Room W12-140, 1200 New
Jersey Avenue, SE., Washington, DC 20590.
     Hand Delivery: U.S. Department of Transportation, Docket
Operations, M-30, West Building Ground Floor, Room W12-140, 1200 New
Jersey Avenue, SE., Washington, DC 20590, between 9 a.m. and 5 p.m.,
Monday through Friday, except Federal holidays.
    For service information identified in this AD, contact Boeing
Commercial Airplanes, P.O. Box 3707, Seattle, Washington 98124-2207.

Examining the AD Docket

    You may examine the AD docket on the Internet at http://
www.regulations.gov; or in person at the Docket Management Facility
between 9 a.m. and 5 p.m., Monday through Friday, except Federal
holidays. The AD docket contains this proposed AD, the regulatory
evaluation, any comments received, and other information. The street
address for the Docket Office (telephone<PHONE_NUMBER>) is in the
ADDRESSES section. Comments will be available in the AD docket shortly
after receipt.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Jason Deutschman, Aerospace Engineer,
Airframe Branch, ANM-120S, FAA, Seattle Aircraft Certification Office,
1601 Lind Avenue, SW., Renton, Washington 98057-3356; telephone (425)
917-6449; fax<PHONE_NUMBER>.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

Comments Invited

    We invite you to send any written relevant data, views, or
arguments about this proposed AD. Send your comments to an address
listed under the ADDRESSES section. Include ``Docket No. FAA-2008-0295;
Directorate Identifier 2007-NM-298-AD'' at the beginning of your
comments. We specifically invite comments on the overall regulatory,
economic, environmental, and energy aspects of this proposed AD. We
will consider all comments received by the closing date and may amend
this proposed AD because of those comments.
    We will post all comments we receive, without change, to http://
www.regulations.gov, including any personal information you provide. We
will also post a report summarizing each substantive verbal contact we
receive about this proposed AD.

Discussion

    Two spin brake assemblies are installed in the nose wheel well and
include the spin brake spring arms. Wear bars or brake pads installed
on the spin brake spring arms bring the nose wheel to a stop after the
gear is retracted. We have received reports of cracked and broken
aluminum spring arms. In some cases, the aluminum spin brake spring arm
separated from the airplane. Cracked or broken spring arms, if not
detected and corrected, could

separate from the airplane and result in potential hazard to persons or
property on the ground, or ingestion into the engine with engine damage
and potential shutdown, or damage to the airplane.

Relevant Service Information

    We have reviewed Boeing Special Attention Service Bulletin 757-32-
0176, dated September 10, 2007. The service bulletin describes
procedures for an inspection of the two spring arms in the spin brake
assemblies in the nose wheel well to determine if the spring arms are
made of aluminum or composite material. The compliance time for
determining the material of the spring arm is before the accumulation
of 6,000 total flight cycles on the spring arm, or within 300 flight
cycles, whichever occurs later.
    For any aluminum spin arm, the service bulletin describes
procedures for related investigative/corrective actions. The related
investigative actions include repetitive detailed and high frequency
eddy current inspections for cracking of the aluminum spring arm. The
compliance time for doing the first detailed inspection is before the
accumulation of 6,000 total flight cycles on the spin arm; or within
300 flight cycles, whichever occurs later. The repetitive interval for
the detailed inspection is 300 flight cycles. The compliance time for
doing the first high frequency eddy current inspection is before the
accumulation of 6,000 total flight cycles on the spin arm; or within
1,500 flight cycles, whichever occurs later. The repetitive interval
for the high frequency eddy current inspection is 1,500 flight cycles.
    The corrective action if any crack is found on an aluminum spring
arm is replacing the spring arm with a new spring arm made of either
aluminum or composite material. The service bulletin states that the
replacement is to be done before further flight, except that the
airplane can be operated for 10 calendar days with the spin brake
spring arms removed provided the airplane is operated within the
restrictions given in the Boeing Model 757 Master Minimum Equipment
List (MMEL).
    The service bulletin also specifies that replacing an aluminum
spring arm with a spring arm made of composite material ends the need
for the repetitive inspections.

FAA's Determination and Requirements of This Proposed AD

    We are proposing this AD because we evaluated all relevant
information and determined the unsafe condition described previously is
likely to exist or develop in other products of the same type design.
This proposed AD would require accomplishing the actions specified in
the service information described previously.

Interim Action

    The service bulletin indicates that the design for the spring arm
was changed from composite to aluminum due to reports of excessive
noise related to the spring arm made of composite material. Boeing is
currently developing a kit to replace the aluminum spring arm with a
new part made from corrosion resistant steel (CRES). Once the CRES
spring arm is developed, approved, and available, the FAA might
consider additional rulemaking. However, the spring arm made of
composite material is adequate to ensure continued operational safety
of the airplane.

Costs of Compliance

    We estimate that this proposed AD would affect 668 airplanes of
U.S. registry. We also estimate that it would take about 1 work-hour
per product to comply with this proposed AD. The average labor rate is
$80 per work-hour. Based on these figures, we estimate the cost of this
proposed AD to the U.S. operators to be $53,440, or $80 per product.

Authority for This Rulemaking

    Title 49 of the United States Code specifies the FAA's authority to
issue rules on aviation safety. Subtitle I, section 106, describes the
authority of the FAA Administrator. ``Subtitle VII: Aviation
Programs,'' describes in more detail the scope of the Agency's
authority.
    We are issuing this rulemaking under the authority described in
``Subtitle VII, Part A, Subpart III, Section 44701: General
requirements.'' Under that section, Congress charges the FAA with
promoting safe flight of civil aircraft in air commerce by prescribing
regulations for practices, methods, and procedures the Administrator
finds necessary for safety in air commerce. This regulation is within
the scope of that authority because it addresses an unsafe condition
that is likely to exist or develop on products identified in this
rulemaking action.

Regulatory Findings

    We determined that this proposed AD would not have federalism
implications under Executive Order 13132. This proposed AD would not
have a substantial direct effect on the States, on the relationship
between the national Government and the States, or on the distribution
of power and responsibilities among the various levels of government.
    For the reasons discussed above, I certify this proposed
regulation:
    1. Is not a ``significant regulatory action'' under Executive Order
12866,
    2. Is not a ``significant rule'' under the DOT Regulatory Policies
and Procedures (44 FR 11034, February 26, 1979), and
    3. Will not have a significant economic impact, positive or
negative, on a substantial number of small entities under the criteria
of the Regulatory Flexibility Act.
    You can find our regulatory evaluation and the estimated costs of
compliance in the AD Docket.

List of Subjects in 14 CFR Part 39

    Air transportation, Aircraft, Aviation safety, Safety.

The Proposed Amendment

    Accordingly, under the authority delegated to me by the
Administrator, the FAA proposes to amend 14 CFR part 39 as follows:

PART 39--AIRWORTHINESS DIRECTIVES

    1. The authority citation for part 39 continues to read as follows:

    Authority: 49 U.S.C. 106(g), 40113, 44701.

Sec.  39.13  [Amended]

    2. The FAA amends Sec.  39.13 by adding the following new AD:

Boeing: Docket No. FAA-2008-0295; Directorate Identifier 2007-NM-
298-AD.

Comments Due Date

    (a) We must receive comments by April 28, 2008.

Affected ADs

    (b) None.

Applicability

    (c) This AD applies to all Boeing Model 757-200, -200PF, -200CB,
and -300 series airplanes, certificated in any category.

Unsafe Condition

    (d) This AD results from reports of cracked and broken aluminum
spring arms. We are issuing this AD to detect and correct cracked or
broken spring arms. A cracked or broken spring arm could separate
from the airplane and result in potential hazard to persons or
property on the ground, or ingestion into the engine with engine
damage and potential shut down, or damage to the airplane.

Compliance

    (e) Comply with this AD within the compliance times specified,
unless already done.

Inspections and Corrective Actions

    (f) At the applicable time specified in paragraph 1.E.,
``Compliance,'' of Boeing Special Attention Service Bulletin 757-32-

0176, dated September 10, 2007, do a general visual inspection to
determine the material (aluminum or composite) of the two spring
arms in the spin brake assemblies in the nose wheel well. A review
of airplane maintenance records is acceptable in lieu of this
inspection if the material can be conclusively determined from that
review. Do all applicable related investigative and corrective
actions, and all repetitive inspections thereafter, at the
applicable time specified in paragraph 1.E., ``Compliance,'' of the
service bulletin. Do all actions in accordance with the
Accomplishment Instructions of Boeing Special Attention Service
Bulletin 757-32-0176, dated September 10, 2007, except, where the
service bulletin specifies a compliance time after the date on the
service bulletin, this AD requires compliance within the specified
compliance time after the effective date of this AD.

Optional Terminating Action

    (g) Replacing an aluminum spring arm with a spring arm made of
composite material in accordance with Figure 5 of Boeing Special
Attention Service Bulletin 757-32-0176, dated September 10, 2007,
ends the repetitive inspections required by paragraph (f) of this AD
for that spring arm.

Alternative Methods of Compliance (AMOCs)

    (h)(1) The Manager, Seattle Aircraft Certification Office (ACO),
FAA, ATTN: Jason Deutschman, Aerospace Engineer, Airframe Branch,
ANM-120S, FAA, Seattle Aircraft Certification Office, 1601 Lind
Avenue, SW., Renton, Washington 98057-3356; telephone (425) 917-
6449; fax<PHONE_NUMBER>; has the authority to approve AMOCs for
this AD, if requested using the procedures found in 14 CFR 39.19.
    (2) To request a different method of compliance or a different
compliance time for this AD, follow the procedures in 14 CFR 39.19.
Before using any approved AMOC on any airplane to which the AMOC
applies, notify your appropriate principal inspector (PI) in the FAA
Flight Standards District Office (FSDO), or lacking a PI, your local
FSDO.
    (3) An AMOC that provides an acceptable level of safety may be
used for any repair required by this AD, if it is approved by an
Authorized Representative for the Boeing Commercial Airplanes
Delegation Option Authorization Organization who has been authorized
by the Manager, Seattle ACO, to make those findings. For a repair
method to be approved, the repair must meet the certification basis
of the airplane, and the approval must specifically refer to this
AD.

    Issued in Renton, Washington, on March 3, 2008.
Ali Bahrami,
Manager, Transport Airplane Directorate, Aircraft Certification
Service.
 [FR Doc. E8-5014 Filed 3-12-08; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4910-13-P


[Federal Register: April 22, 2009 (Volume 74, Number 76)]
[Notices]
[Page 18409-18410]
[DOCID:fr22ap09-81]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

Submission for OMB Review; Comment Request

Upon Written Request, Copies Available From: Securities and Exchange
Commission, Office of Investor Education and Advocacy, Washington, DC
20549-0213.

Extension:
    Rule 15g-5; OMB Control No. 3235-0394; SEC File No. 270-348.

    Notice is hereby given that pursuant to the Paperwork Reduction Act
of 1995 (44 U.S.C. 3501 et seq.), the Securities and Exchange
Commission (``Commission'') has submitted to the Office of Management
and Budget a request for extension of the existing collection of
information provided for in the following rule: Rule 15g-5--Disclosure
of compensation of associated persons in connection with penny stock
transactions (17 CFR 240.15g-5) under the Securities

Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78a et seq.).
    Rule 15g-5 requires brokers and dealers to disclose to customers
the amount of compensation to be received by their sales agents in
connection with penny stock transactions. The purpose of the rule is to
increase the level of disclosure to investors concerning penny stocks
generally and specific penny stock transactions.
    The Commission estimates that approximately 240 broker-dealers will
spend an average of 100 hours annually to comply with the rule. Thus,
the total compliance burden is approximately 24,000 burden-hours per
year.
    Rule 15g-5 contains record retention requirements. Compliance with
the rule is mandatory. An agency may not conduct or sponsor, and a
person is not required to respond to, a collection of information
unless it displays a currently valid control number.
    Comments should be directed to: (i) Desk Officer for the Securities
and Exchange Commission, Office of Information and Regulatory Affairs,
Office of Management and Budget, Room 10102, New Executive Office
Building, Washington, DC 20503 or by sending an e-mail to: Shagufta_
<EMAIL_ADDRESS>and (ii) Charles Boucher, Director/Chief Information
Officer, Securities and Exchange Commission, c/o Shirley Martinson,
6432 General Green Way, Alexandria, VA 22312 or send an e-mail to PRA_
<EMAIL_ADDRESS>Comments must be submitted within 30 days of this
notice.

    April 15, 2009.
Florence E. Harmon,
Deputy Secretary.
[FR Doc. E9-9162 Filed 4-21-09; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 8010-01-P


[Federal Register: February 14, 2007 (Volume 72, Number 30)]
[Notices]
[Page 7104]
[DOCID:fr14fe07-140]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

[Release No. 34-55259; File No. SR-NSCC-2006-18]

Self-Regulatory Organizations; National Securities Clearing
Corporation; Order Granting Accelerated Approval of a Proposed Rule
Change To Create Service To Facilitate the Exchange of Account Related
Information on an Automated Basis Between Members

February 8, 2007.

I. Introduction

    On December 21, 2006, the National Securities Clearing Corporation
(``NSCC'') filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission
(``Commission'') and on January 5, 2007, amended \1\ proposed rule
change SR-NSCC-2006-18 pursuant to Section 19(b)(1) of the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934 (``Act'').\2\ Notice of the proposal was published
in the Federal Register on January 18, 2007.\3\ The Commission received
no comment letters. For the reasons discussed below, the Commission is
approving the proposed rule change on an accelerated basis.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \1\ The amendment added the number of the new rule inadvertently
omitted in the original filing.
    \2\ 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(1).
    \3\ Securities Exchange Act Release No. 55082 (January 10,
2007), 72 FR 2319.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

II. Description

    Currently, when a correspondent firm chooses to move its book of
business from one NSCC member to another, there is no standard method
for transmitting the detailed customer data between the members. This
information is currently exchanged through tapes, CDs, and other means
and is dependent on the proprietary data format and values defined by
the clearing firm from which the correspondent is moving. The process
is time-consuming and prone to incorrect interpretation of data values.
It is made more inefficient because clearing firms maintain separate
code for each other clearing firm for which they convert data.
    NSCC is modifying its rules to create the Account Information
Transmission Service (``AIT'') to facilitate the exchange of account
related information during the movement of correspondent broker
accounts between members or during other material events that result in
the bulk movement of accounts between members. AIT will provide members
with a standard mechanism to transmit customer data that will reduce
the potential for lost and incorrectly interpreted data and will
provide members with a secure facility for the exchange of data. The
standard data model also will allow for the adoption of a single code
base that is applicable for all conversion events. NSCC believes the
single standard format could reduce costs, increase accuracy, and
accelerate delivery time.
    NSCC will develop and introduce AIT in two phases. The first phase
is to create the mechanism by which members may transmit data between
themselves. NSCC will implement the first phase on Monday, February 12,
2007. The second phase will involve the development of standardized
data formats. NSCC will notify the Commission of phase two enhancements
prior to their implementation.
    Since AIT is only an information transmission service, NSCC is also
amending its rules to clarify that NSCC is not responsible for the
accuracy or completeness of any information transmitted through AIT or
for any omissions or delays that may occur in the transmission of AIT
data. Finally, NSCC is implementing a $200 monthly subscription fee for
participation in AIT during phase one. NSCC will reevaluate AIT service
fees as subsequent enhancements are completed.

III. Discussion

    Section 19(b) of the Act directs the Commission to approve a
proposed rule change of a self-regulatory organization if it finds that
such proposed rule change is consistent with the requirements of the
Act and the rules and regulations thereunder applicable to such
organization.\4\ Section 17A(b)(3)(F) of the Act requires that the
rules of a clearing agency be designed to promote the prompt and
accurate clearance and settlement of securities transactions.\5\ The
Commission finds that NSCC's rule change is consistent with these
requirements because by reducing costs, increasing accuracy, and
accelerating delivery time of bulk movement of accounts between
members, the proposed rule change should better enable NSCC to promote
the prompt and accurate clearance and settlement of securities
transactions.\6\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \4\ 15 U.S.C. 78s(b).
    \5\ 15 U.S.C. 78q-1(b)(3)(F).
    \6\ In approving the proposed rule change, the Commission
considered the proposal's impact on efficiency, competition, and
capital formation. 15 U.S.C. 78c(f).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    The Commission believes there is good cause for approving the
proposed rule change prior to the thirtieth day after the date of
publication of notice of filing because doing such will allow NSCC to
implement AIT according to its system implementation schedule.

IV. Conclusion

    On the basis of the foregoing, the Commission finds that the
proposed rule change is consistent with the requirements of the Act and
in particular Section 17A of the Act and the rules and regulations
thereunder.
    It is therefore ordered, pursuant to Section 19(b)(2) of the
Act,\7\ that the proposed rule change (File No. SR-NSCC-2006-18) be and
hereby is approved on an accelerated basis.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \7\ 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(2).

    For the Commission by the Division of Market Regulation,
pursuant to delegated authority.\8\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \8\ 17 CFR 200.30-3(a)(12).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

Nancy M. Morris,
Secretary.
 [FR Doc. E7-2540 Filed 2-13-07; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 8010-01-P