10 September 2008

David Conroy

EPA - New England, Region I

1 Congress Street, Suite 1100

Boston, MA 02114-2023

Dear Mr. Conroy:

As you are aware, sections 110(a) (1) and (2) of the Clean Air Act (CAA)
provide procedural, timing and infrastructure requirements related to
compliance with National Ambient Air Quality Standards (NAAQS).  In
2005, the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) entered into a
Consent Decree with Earth Justice which obligates EPA to determine
whether states have made the submissions necessary to meet the 110(a)(1)
and (2) requirements for the PM2.5 NAAQS by 5 October 2008.  To meet
this obligation, EPA issued a guidance memo on 2 October 2007 directing
states to review their existing ozone State Implementation Plans (SIPs)
and, if the existing SIP is adequate to meet the 110(a) requirements, to
certify that adequacy in a letter to the EPA.  This letter will serve as
the required certification for Rhode Island.

The guidance memo identifies fourteen elements required under Sections
110(a)(1) and (2).  Those elements and the sections of the Rhode Island
program that are consistent with those elements are identified in the
attached table. The Rhode Island SIP, which was approved in May 1972,
and its numerous subsequent revisions fulfill most of these
requirements.  Other Section 110(a)(2) requirements are fulfilled in
Section 23-23 of the Rhode Island General Laws (RIGL) and in the Rhode
Island Air Pollution Control Regulations (APCR) that have been
incorporated into or submitted to the EPA for incorporation into the
Rhode Island SIP.

If you have any questions, please contact Barbara Morin of my staff at
(401) 222-4700, extension 7012.

Very truly yours,

Stephen Majkut, Chief

Office of Air Resources

cc.   Anne Arnold, EPA Region I

Rhode Island’s Compliance with CAA

Section 110(a)(1) and (2) SIP requirements

CAA Section	110(a) Requirement 	Corresponding Rhode Island Requirements

110(a)(2)(A) Emission limits and other control measures	Enforceable
emission limitations and other control measures, means, or techniques,
schedules for compliance and other related matters. 	RIGL §
23-23-5  “Powers and duties of the director” authorizes the RI DEM
Director “to make, issue, and amend rules and regulations … for the
prevention, control, abatement, and limitation of air pollution….   .
The director may prohibit emissions, discharges and/or releases and may
require specific control technology .”

Specific emissions limits and the framework for implementation of those
limits are found in the following RI APCR regulations:

No. 1 – Visible Emissions

No. 3 – Particulate Emissions from Industrial Processes

No. 4 – Open Fires

No. 5 – Fugitive Dust

No. 6 – Opacity Monitors

No. 8 – Sulfur Content of Fuels

No. 9 – Air Pollution Control Permits

No. 12 – Incinerators

No. 13 – Particulate Emissions from Fossil Fuel Fired Steam or Hote
Water Generating Units

No. 20 – Burning of Alternative Fuels

No. 29 – Operating Permits

No. 39 – Hospital/Medical/Infectious Waste Incinerators

No. 42 – Heavy-Duty Diesel Engine Standards

No. 43 – General Permits for Smaller-Scale Electric Generation
Facilities

No. 45 – Rhode Island Diesel Engine Anti-Idling Program

110(a)(2)(B) Ambient Air quality monitoring/data system	Provisions to
provide for establishment and operation of ambient air quality monitors,
collecting and analyzing ambient air quality data, and making these data
available to the EPA 	Section VI of the 1972 RI SIP specifies
requirements for the operation of an Air Quality Surveillance Network.
.

The latest annual air monitoring network plan was submitted to EPA on
9 July 2008.  Data collected by network monitors are reviewed,
validated and sent to the EPA air quality system no later than 90 days
after the end of a calendar quarter.

110(a)(2)(C) Program for enforcement of control measures

	Include a program providing for enforcement of all SIP measures and the
regulation of construction of new or modified stationary sources to meet
prevention of significant deterioration (PSD) and nonattainment New
Source Review (NSR) requirements. 	§ 23-23-10, 23-23-11 and 23-23-14 of
the RIGL provide DEM with civil and criminal enforcement authorities,
including the authority to assess penalties.

RI APCR No. 9, “Air Pollution Control Permits,” sets forth PSD and
NSR requirements for new and modified stationary sources. This rule
includes limits for PM10 but does not yet address PM2.5.  EPA’s
implementation rule for PM2.5 in NSR programs, which was promulgated on
May 8, 2008, allows states up to three years to submit SIPs
incorporating PM2.5 elements into their NSR rules.  In the interim,
states with approved PSD programs, like Rhode Island, may use the
interim approach specified in 2007 EPA guidance which uses PM10 as a
surrogate for PM2.5. in NSR programs. RI DEM is currently using the
interim approach and will adopt the PM2.5 NSR elements by May 8, 2011.

110(a)(2)(D) Interstate transport	Include provisions prohibiting any
source or other type of emissions activity in one state from
contributing significantly to nonattainment, or interfering with
maintenance, of the NAAQS in another state, or from interfering with PSD
measures or measures to protect visibility in another state. 	A revision
to the Rhode Island’s SIP addressing 110(a)(2)(D) requirements was
submitted to EPA as a SIP revision on April 30, 2008.  EPA’s CAIR
analysis shows that Rhode Island does not contribute significantly to
nonattainment in downwind states

110(a)(2)(E) Adequate resources

	Provide for adequate personnel, funding and legal authority under state
law to carry out the SIP.

	§ 23-23-5  of the RIGL provides the Director of DEM with the legal
authority to enforce air pollution control requirements.

Section III of the RI SIP specifies the RI DEM’s legal authority to
implement SIP measures

§ 23-23-5 of the RIGL provides for the assessment of operating permit
fees from air emissions sources, allows for DEM to assess
preconstruction permit fees and establishes a general revenue reserve
account within the general fund to finance the state clean air programs.
  RIAPCR No. 28, “Operating Permit Fees,” requires major sources to
pay annual operating permit fees.

The RI DEM “Rules and Regulations Governing the Establishment of
Various Fees” sets forth permit fee requirements for air emissions
sources and the legal authority to collect those fees.

110(a)(2)(F) Stationary source emissions monitoring and reporting
Establish a system to monitor emissions from stationary sources and to
submit periodic emissions reports. 	Section IV of the RI SIP sets forth
an emissions surveillance program.

APCR No. 9, “Air Pollution Control Permits,” requires emissions
testing of permitted process within 60 days of full operation and
specifies that preconstruction permits issued contain and emissions
testing section.

APCR No. 14 "Record Keeping and Reporting" requires emission sources to
report annually emissions and other data to RI DEM.

APCR No. 29,  “Operating Permits” requires  periodic emissions
testing..

110(a)(2)(G) Emergency power	Provide for authority to address activities
causing imminent and substantial endangerment of public health,
including contingency plans to implement the emergency episode
provisions of the SIP.

	Section V of the RI SIP specifies RI DEM’s Emergency Episode
Authority and Procedures.

§ 23-23-16 of the RIGL allows the Director of RI DEM to order a source
to cease operations if it is determined that emissions from the source
pose an immediate danger to public health or safety.

 § 23-23.1-5 of the RIGL sets forth specifications for
the proclamation of air pollution episodes and issuance of orders.

EPA guidance issued on March 24, 2008 entitled “Emergency Episode Plan
Requirements” states that EPA intends to require emergency episode
plans for PM2.5 only if the maximum 24-hour PM2.5 concentration measured
in the previous 3-year period was 140.5 µg/m3 or greater.  Since the
maximum 24-hour level recorded in Rhode Island in the past three years
is 44.7 µg/m3, a plan will not be required in Rhode Island.

110(a)(2)(H) Future SIP revisions

	States must have the authority to revise their SIPs in response to
changes in the NAAQS, availability of improved methods for attaining the
NAAQS, or in response to an EPA finding that the SIP is substantially
inadequate.

	§ 23-23-5 of the RIGL allows the Director of RI DEM to “make,
issue, and amend rules and regulations ….. for the prevention,
control, abatement, and limitation of air pollution.”

110(a)(2)(J) Consultation with government officials	Provide a process
for consultation with local governments and Federal Land Mangers
carrying out NAAQS implementation requirements pursuant to section 121
relating to consultation.	§ 23-23-5 of the RIGL specifies that the RI
DEM Director shall “advise and consult with agencies of the United
States, agencies of the state, political subdivisions and industries and
any other affected groups in furtherance of the purposes of this
chapter.”

110(a)(2)(J) Public notification

	Requires states to notify the public if NAAQS are exceeded in an area
and enhance public awareness of measures that can be taken to prevent
exceedances.

	RI APCR No. 10, “Air Pollution Episodes,” specifies criteria for
and measures to be implemented during air pollution alerts, warnings and
episodes.

RI DEM’s website includes near real-time air quality data, air quality
predictions and a record of historical data. DEM's predictions are also
displayed daily in the Providence Journal, a newspaper with statewide
circulation.  Alerts are sent by email to a large number of affected
parties – emissions sources, concerned individuals, schools, health
and environmental agencies and the media. Alerts include information
about the health implications of elevated pollutant levels and list
actions that reduce emissions.

Air Quality Data Summaries summarizing the year’s air quality
monitoring results are issued annually.  The summaries are sent to a
mailing list of interested parties and posted on the RI DEM website.

110(a)(2)(J) PSD and visibility Protection	Meet the applicable
requirements of part C relating to prevention of significant
deterioration of air quality and visibility protection.	APCR No. 9,
“Air Pollution Control Permits,” specifies requirements for PSD and
visibility protection.  This rule includes limits for PM10 but does not
yet address PM2.5.  EPA’s implementation rule for PM2.5 in NSR
programs, which was promulgated on May 8, 2008, allows states up to
three years to submit SIPs incorporating PM2.5 elements into their NSR
rules.  In the interim, states with approved PSD programs, like Rhode
Island, may use the interim approach specified in 2007 EPA guidancei
which uses PM10 as a surrogate for PM2.5. in NSR programs. RI DEM is
currently using the interim approach and will adopt the PM2.5 NSR
elements by May 8, 2011.

110(a)(2)(K)

Air quality modeling/data

	Provide for air quality modeling for predicting effects on air quality
of emissions from any NAAQS pollutant and submission of such data to EPA
upon request. 	APCR No. 9, “Air Pollution Control Permits,” requires
the submittal of air quality modeling to demonstrate impacts of new and
modified major sources.

110(a)(2)(L) Permitting fees

	Require each major stationary source to pay permitting fees to cover
the cost of reviewing, approving, implementing and enforcing a permit.
§ 23-23-5 of the RIGL provides for the assessment of operating permit
fees and preconstruction permit fees for air emissions sources.

RIAPCR No. 28, “Operating Permit Fees,” requires major sources to
pay annual operating permit fees.

The RI DEM “Rules and Regulations Governing the Establishment of
Various Fees” sets forth permit fee requirements for air emissions
sources and the legal authority to collect those fees.

110(a)(2)(M) Consultation/ Participation by affected local entities

	Provide for consultation and participation in SIP development by local
political subdivisions affected by the SIP	§ 23-23-5 of the RIGL
provides for the RI DEM Director to consult and cooperate with the
cities and towns.

 PAGE

 PAGE   2

 Memorandum from, Steven D. Page entitled “Implementation of New
Source Review Requirements in PM-2.5 Nonattainment Areas,” April 5,
2005, and the October 23, 1997, John S. Seitz memorandum entitled
“Interim Implementation of New Source Review Requirements for
PM2.5,” referenced therein.


[Federal Register Volume 80, Number 91 (Tuesday, May 12, 2015)]
[Notices]
[Pages 27217-27219]
[FR Doc No: 2015-11380]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

[Release No. 34-74889; File No. SR-NYSE-2015-23]

Self-Regulatory Organizations; New York Stock Exchange, LLC;
Notice of Filing and Immediate Effectiveness of Proposed Rule Change
Deleting Rules 16 and 17T Related to the Terminated Intermarket Trading
System, NMS Linkage Plans, and Amending Rules 45, 47, 52, 54, 93, 94,
95, 104A.50 and 123 To Remove Outdated References to the ITS Plan

May 6, 2015.
    Pursuant to Section 19(b)(1) \1\ of the Securities Exchange Act of
1934 (the ``Act'') \2\ and Rule 19b-4 thereunder,\3\ notice is hereby
given that on May 4, 2015, New York Stock Exchange LLC (``NYSE'' or the
``Exchange'') filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the
``Commission'') the proposed rule change as described in Items I, II,
and III below, which Items have been prepared by the self-regulatory
organization. The Commission is publishing this notice to solicit
comments on the proposed rule change from interested persons.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \1\ 15 U.S.C.78s(b)(1).
    \2\ 15 U.S.C. 78a.
    \3\ 17 CFR 240.19b-4.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

I. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement of the Terms of the
Substance of the Proposed Rule Change

    The Exchange proposes to (1) delete Rules 16 and 17T related to the
terminated Intermarket Trading System (``ITS'') and NMS Linkage Plans,
respectively, and (2) amend Rules 45, 47, 52, 54, 93, 94, 95, 104A.50
and 123 to remove outdated references to the ITS Plan. The text of the
proposed rule change is available on the Exchange's Web site at
www.nyse.com, at the principal office of the Exchange, and at the
Commission's Public Reference Room.

II. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement of the Purpose of, and
Statutory Basis for, the Proposed Rule Change

    In its filing with the Commission, the self-regulatory organization
included statements concerning the purpose of, and basis for, the
proposed rule change and discussed any comments it received on the
proposed rule change. The text of those statements may be examined at
the places specified in Item IV below. The Exchange has prepared
summaries, set forth in sections A, B, and C below, of the most
significant parts of such statements.

A. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement of the Purpose of, and
Statutory Basis for, the Proposed Rule Change

1. Purpose
    The Exchange proposes to (1) delete Rules 16 and 17T related to the
terminated ITS and NMS Linkage Plans, respectively, and (2) amend Rules
45, 47, 52, 54, 93, 94, 95, 104A.50 and 123 to remove outdated
references to the ITS Plan.
    First, the Exchange proposes to delete Rules 16 and 17T in their
entirety. Rule 16 governs Exchange liability for use of ITS \4\ and the
ITS Pre-Opening Application.\5\ ITS was eliminated on June 30, 2007.
Similarly, Rule 17T was adopted in October 2006 as an interim measure
in order to provide member access to other market center participants
in the NMS Linkage Plan. The NMS Linkage Plan became effective on
October 1, 2006 and ran concurrently with the ITS Plan until March 5,
2007, at which time the Order Protection Rule of Reg. NMS became
operative. The NMS Linkage Plan terminated on June 30, 2007.\6\ Rules
16 and 17T are accordingly obsolete.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \4\ Between 1978 and 1997, ITS was the principal means of
electronically transmitting orders between market centers to avoid
trading through superior quotes in those markets. When the
Commission adopted Regulation National Market System (``Reg. NMS''),
the ITS Plan participants terminated the governing agreement, the
ITS Plan, and replaced it with the NMS Linkage Plan. See Securities
Exchange Act Release No. 54551 (September 29, 2006), 71 FR 194
(October 6, 2006). The purpose of the NMS Linkage Plan was to enable
the plan participants to act jointly in planning, developing,
operating and regulating the NMS Linkage System that would
electronically link the participant markets to one another.
    \5\ Prior to its amendment in 2007, Rule 15 defined an ``Pre-
Opening Application'' as ``the application of the System that
permits a market-maker in one Participant market who wishes to open
his market in an Eligible Listed Security to obtain from other
market-makers registered in that security in other Participant
markets any pre-opening interests such other market-makers might
decide to disclose as set forth in the ITS Plan.''
    \6\ See Securities Exchange Act Release No. 57003 (December 20,
2007), 72 FR 73949, 73950 (December 28, 2007) (SR-NYSE-2007-112)
(``Rule 15 Amendment'').
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    Second, the Exchange proposes to remove the following outdated
references to the ITS Plan in Rules 45, 47, 52, 54, 93, 94, 95, 104A.50
and 123: \7\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \7\ In 2014, the Exchange amended Rules 15A and 123D to remove
outdated references to the ITS Plan. See Securities Exchange Act
Release No. 72916 (August 26, 2014), 79 FR 52094 (September 2, 2014)
(SR-NYSE-2014-44).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

     Rule 45 governs the application of Exchange Rules 46 to
294 to contracts made on the Exchange. Rule 45 would be amended to
remove the second paragraph carving out transactions effected pursuant
to ITS, which are subject to the Rules specified in Rule 15. Rule 15
was amended in 2007, which had been rendered obsolete following
adoption of the NMS Linkage Plan.\8\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \8\ See Rule 15 Amendment, 72 FR at 73950.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

     Rule 47, which provides that Floor Officials have the
power to supervise and regulate active openings and unusual situations,
would be amended to delete the second sentence of the Rule providing
that Floor Officials can also supervise and regulate the operation of
ITS during active openings and unusual situations.
     Rule 52, which provides that dealings on the Exchange are
limited to business hours, would be amended to remove the clause
prohibiting members from issuing a commitment to trade through ITS
outside of business hours and the clause relating to DMM pre-opening
notifications and pre-opening responses sent pursuant to ITS.
     Rule 54 provides that only members can make or accept bids
and offers, consummate transactions or otherwise transact business on
the Exchange trading Floor. Rule 54 would be amended to delete the
second sentence of subpart (a) to remove the exception for commitments
or obligations to trade through ITS.
     Rule 93 prohibits members from directly or indirectly
holding any interest or participation in an unreported joint account.
Rule 93 would be amended to remove Supplementary Material .10, which
provides that members issuing ITS commitments or obligations to trade
are deemed to be initiating a purchase or a sale of a security on the
Exchange for purposes of Rule 93. Rule 93 would also be amended to
remove the explanatory note that certain portions of the Rule were
repositioned from Rule 423 effective April 27, 1983.
     Rule 94 prohibits DMMs from directly or indirectly
acquiring or

holding any interest or participation in an joint account for buying or
selling on the Exchange ``or any other Application of the System''.
Rule 94 would be amended to delete the clause ``or any other
Application of the System'', which is a reference to ITS.
     Rule 95 prohibits members on the Floor from executing or
causing to be executed discretionary transaction on the Exchange and
through ITS ``or any application of the System''. Rule 95 would be
amended to remove the references to ITS.
     Rule 104A.50 requires DMMs to maintain record of purchases
and sales initiated on the Floor, including purchases and sales
resulting from commitments or obligations to trade issued through ITS.
Rule 104A.50 would be amended to remove the references to ITS. The Rule
also provides that price designations for transactions made in another
market center through ITS are to be determined from the immediately
preceding transaction price on the Exchange ``at the time the
commitment or obligation to trade is issued.'' Rule 104A.50 would also
be amended to remove these additional references to commitments or
obligations to trade through ITS.
     Rule 123(a) provides that every member must maintain for
at least three years a record of every order originated by the member
on the Floor and given to another member for execution. The record
keeping requirement includes ``every commitment or obligation to trade
issued from the Floor through ITS or any other Application of the
System''. Rule 123(d) requires that before any order is executed,
including where an order is to be executed by issuance from the Floor
of a commitment or obligation to trade through ITS, the account name or
designation for the order must be recorded. Rule 123(a) and (d) would
be amended to delete these references to commitments or obligations to
trade through ITS.
2. Statutory Basis
    The Exchange believes that the proposed rule change is consistent
with Section 6(b) of the Act,\9\ in general, and furthers the
objectives of Section 6(b)(5) of the Act,\10\ in particular, in that it
in that it is designed to prevent fraudulent and manipulative acts and
practices, to promote just and equitable principles of trade, to foster
cooperation and coordination with persons engaged in facilitating
transactions in securities, and to remove impediments to and perfect
the mechanism of a free and open market and a national market system
and, in general, help to protect investors and the public interest.
Specifically, the Exchange believes that deleting rule text relating to
routing arrangements that have been superseded by Reg. NMS removes
impediments to and perfects the mechanism of a free and open market by
simplifying its rulebook and removing confusion that may result from
having obsolete rules in the Exchange's rulebook. The Exchange further
believes that the proposal removes impediments to and perfects the
mechanism of a free and open market by ensuring that persons subject to
the Exchange's jurisdiction, regulators, and the investing public can
more easily navigate and understand the Exchange's rulebook. The
Exchange also believes that eliminating obsolete rules would not be
inconsistent with the public interest and the protection of investors
because investors will not be harmed and in fact would benefit from
increased transparency as to which rules are operable, thereby reducing
potential confusion. Similarly, the Exchange believes that removing
cross-references to obsolete rules would remove impediments to and
perfect the mechanism of a free and open market because it would reduce
potential confusion that may result from having such cross references
in the Exchange's rulebook. Removing such obsolete cross references
will also further the goal of transparency and add clarity to the
Exchange's rules.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \9\ 15 U.S.C. 78f(b).
    \10\ 15 U.S.C. 78f(b)(5).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

B. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement on Burden on Competition

    The Exchange does not believe that the proposed rule change will
impose any burden on competition that is not necessary or appropriate
in furtherance of the purposes of the Act. The proposed change is not
designed to address any competitive issue but rather to delete obsolete
rules and references to obsolete rules, thereby increasing
transparency, reducing confusion, and making the Exchange's rules
easier to understand and navigate.

C. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement on Comments on the Proposed
Rule Change Received From Members, Participants, or Others

    No written comments were solicited or received with respect to the
proposed rule change.

III. Date of Effectiveness of the Proposed Rule Change and Timing for
Commission Action

    Because the foregoing proposed rule change does not: (i)
Significantly affect the protection of investors or the public
interest; (ii) impose any significant burden on competition; and (iii)
become operative for 30 days from the date on which it was filed, or
such shorter time as the Commission may designate, it has become
effective pursuant to Section 19(b)(3)(A)(iii) of the Act \11\ and
subparagraph (f)(6) of Rule 19b-4 thereunder.\12\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \11\ 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(3)(a)(iii).
    \12\ 17 CFR 240.19b-4(f)(6). In addition, Rule 19b-4(f)(6)
requires a self-regulatory organization to give the Commission
written notice of its intent to file the proposed rule change at
least five business days prior to the date of filing of the proposed
rule change, or such shorter time as designated by the Commission.
The Exchange satisfied this requirement.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    At any time within 60 days of the filing of the proposed rule
change, the Commission summarily may temporarily suspend such rule
change if it appears to the Commission that such action is: (i)
Necessary or appropriate in the public interest; (ii) for the
protection of investors; or (iii) otherwise in furtherance of the
purposes of the Act. If the Commission takes such action, the
Commission shall institute proceedings to determine whether the
proposed rule should be approved or disapproved.

IV. Solicitation of Comments

    Interested persons are invited to submit written data, views, and
arguments concerning the foregoing, including whether the proposed rule
change is consistent with the Act. Comments may be submitted by any of
the following methods:

Electronic Comments

     Use the Commission's Internet comment form (http://www.sec.gov/rules/sro.shtml); or
     Send an email to<EMAIL_ADDRESS>Please include
File Number SR-NYSE-2015-23 on the subject line.

Paper Comments

     Send paper comments in triplicate to Brent J. Fields,
Secretary, Securities and Exchange Commission, 100 F Street NE.,
Washington, DC 20549-1090.

All submissions should refer to File Number SR-NYSE-2015-23. This file
number should be included on the subject line if email is used. To help
the Commission process and review your comments more efficiently,
please use only one method. The Commission will post all comments on
the Commission's Internet Web site (http://www.sec.gov/rules/sro.shtml). Copies of the submission, all subsequent amendments, all
written statements with respect to the proposed rule change that are
filed with the Commission, and all written

communications relating to the proposed rule change between the
Commission and any person, other than those that may be withheld from
the public in accordance with the provisions of 5 U.S.C. 552, will be
available for Web site viewing and printing in the Commission's Public
Reference Room, 100 F Street NE., Washington, DC 20549 on official
business days between the hours of 10:00 a.m. and 3:00 p.m. Copies of
such filing also will be available for inspection and copying at the
principal offices of the Exchange. All comments received will be posted
without change; the Commission does not edit personal identifying
information from submissions. You should submit only information that
you wish to make available publicly. All submissions should refer to
File Number SR-NYSE-2015-23, and should be submitted on or before June
2, 2015.

    For the Commission, by the Division of Trading and Markets,
pursuant to delegated authority.\13\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \13\ 17 CFR 200.30-3(a)(12).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

Robert W. Errett,
Deputy Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2015-11380 Filed 5-11-15; 8:45 am]
 BILLING CODE 8011-01-P


[Federal Register: December 12, 2006 (Volume 71, Number 238)]
[Notices]
[Page 74492-74493]
[DOCID:fr12de06-35]

=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission

Notice of Effectiveness of Holding Company and Transaction
Exemptions and Waivers

December 4, 2006.

ALLETE, Inc......................  Docket No. PH06-49-000.
AOG Corporation..................  Docket No. PH06-50-000.
American States Water Company....  Docket No. PH06-51-000.
Consolidated Edison, Inc.........  Docket No. PH06-52-000.
CH Energy Group..................  Docket No. PH06-53-000.
Energy East Corporation..........  Docket No. PH06-54-000.
RGS Energy Group, Inc............  Docket No. PH06-55-000.
Energen Corporation..............  Docket No. PH06-56-000.

UGI Corporation..................  Docket No. PH06-57-000.
Puget Energy, Inc................  Docket No. PH06-58-000.
HH-SU Investments L.L.C..........  Docket No. PH06-59-000.
Cap Rock Energy Corporation......  Docket No. PH06-60-000.
Peoples Energy Corporation.......  Docket No. PH06-61-000.
Peoples Energy Corporation.......  Docket No. PH06-62-000.
Duquesne Light Holdings, Inc.....  Docket No. PH06-63-000.
Milliken & Company...............  Docket No. PH06-64-000.
Intermountain Industries, Inc....  Docket No. PH06-65-000.
TXU Corp.........................  Docket No. PH06-66-000.
Cleco Corporation................  Docket No. PH06-67-000.
KeySpan Energy Corporation.......  Docket No. PH06-68-000.
KeySpan New England, LLC.........  Docket No. PH06-69-000.
WPS Resources Corporation........  Docket No. PH06-70-000.

    Take notice that in July 2006 the holding company and transaction
exemptions and waivers requested in the above-captioned proceedings are
deemed to have been granted by operation of law pursuant to 18 CFR
366.4.

Magalie R. Salas,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. E6-21054 Filed 12-11-06; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 6717-01-P


[Federal Register Volume 85, Number 160 (Tuesday, August 18, 2020)]
[Notices]
[Pages 50821-50822]
[FR Doc No: 2020-17995]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission

[Project No. 2607-015]

 Spencer Mountain Hydropower, LLC; Notice of Intent To File
License Application, Filing of Pre-Application Document, and Approving
Use of the Traditional Licensing Process

    a. Type of Filing: Notice of Intent to File License Application and
Request to Use the Traditional Licensing Process.
    b. Project No.: 2607-015.
    c. Date Filed: June 30, 2020.
    d. Submitted By: Spencer Mountain Hydropower, LLC.
    e. Name of Project: Spencer Mountain Hydropower Project.
    f. Location: On the South Fork of the Catawba River, in the Town of
Spencer Mountain, in Gaston County, North Carolina. The project does
not occupy federal lands.
    g. Filed Pursuant to: 18 CFR 5.3 of the Commission's Regulations.
    h. Potential Applicant Contact: Kevin Edwards, 916 Comer Road,
Stoneville, NC 27048;<PHONE_NUMBER>; [email protected]
    i. FERC Contact: Michael Spencer at<PHONE_NUMBER>, or email at
<EMAIL_ADDRESS>    j. Spencer Mountain Hydropower, LLC filed its request to use the
Traditional Licensing Process, and provided public notice of its
request, on June 30, 2020. In a letter dated August 12, 2020, the
Director of the Division of Hydropower Licensing approved Spencer
Mountain Hydropower, LLC's request to use the Traditional Licensing
Process.
    k. With this notice, we are initiating informal consultation with
the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service and/or NOAA Fisheries under section
7 of the Endangered Species Act and the joint agency regulations
thereunder at 50 CFR, Part 402. We are also initiating consultation
with the North Carolina

State Historic Preservation Officer, as required by section 106 of the
National Historic Preservation Act, and the implementing regulations of
the Advisory Council on Historic Preservation at 36 CFR 800.2.
    l. With this notice, we are designating Spencer Mountain
Hydropower, LLC as the Commission's non-federal representative for
carrying out informal consultation pursuant to section 7 of the
Endangered Species Act and consultation pursuant to section 106 of the
National Historic Preservation Act.
    m. Spencer Mountain Hydropower, LLC filed a Pre-Application
Document (PAD; including a proposed process plan and schedule) with the
Commission, pursuant to 18 CFR 5.6 of the Commission's regulations.
    n. A copy of the PAD may be viewed on the Commission's website
(http://www.ferc.gov), using the eLibrary link. Enter the docket
number, excluding the last three digits in the docket number field, to
access the document. At this time, the Commission has suspended access
to the Commission's Public Reference Room, due to the proclamation
declaring a National Emergency concerning the Novel Coronavirus Disease
(COVID-19), issued by the President on March 13, 2020. For assistance,
contact FERC Online Support at<EMAIL_ADDRESS>(866) 208
3676 (toll free), or<PHONE_NUMBER> (TTY).
    o. The licensee states its unequivocal intent to submit an
application for a new license for Project No. 2607-015. Pursuant to 18
CFR 16.8, 16.9, and 16.10 each application for a new license and any
competing license applications must be filed with the Commission at
least 24 months prior to the expiration of the existing license. All
applications for license for this project must be filed by June 30,
2023.
    p. Register online at http://www.ferc.gov/docs-filing/esubscription.asp to be notified via email of new filing and issuances
related to this or other pending projects. For assistance, contact FERC
Online Support.

    Dated: August 12, 2020.
Kimberly D. Bose,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2020-17995 Filed 8-17-20; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6717-01-P


[Federal Register Volume 85, Number 148 (Friday, July 31, 2020)]
[Proposed Rules]
[Pages 46015-46016]
[FR Doc No: 2020-16296]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION

Federal Aviation Administration

14 CFR Part 71

[Docket No. FAA-2020-0645; Airspace Docket No. 20-ASO-18]
RIN 2120-AA66

Proposed Amendment of Class E Airspace; Toccoa, GA

AGENCY: Federal Aviation Administration (FAA), DOT.

ACTION: Notice of proposed rulemaking (NPRM).

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: This action proposes to amend Class E airspace extending
upward from 700 feet above the surface in Toccoa, GA, due to the
decommissioning of the Foothills VHF Omnidirectional Range/Distance
Measuring Equipment (VOR/DME) and cancellation of the associated
approaches at Toccoa RG Letourneau Field Airport. This action would
also update the geographic coordinates of the airport, as well as
Habersham County Airport. Controlled airspace is necessary for the
safety and management of instrument flight rules (IFR) operations in
the area.

DATES: Comments must be received on or before September 14, 2020.

ADDRESSES: Send comments on this proposal to: the U.S. Department of
Transportation, Docket Operations, 1200 New Jersey Avenue SE, West
Building Ground Floor, Room W12-140, Washington, DC 20590-0001;
Telephone:<PHONE_NUMBER>, or<PHONE_NUMBER>. You must identify the
Docket No. FAA-2020-0645; Airspace Docket No. 20-ASO-18, at the
beginning of your comments. You may also submit comments through the
internet at https://www.regulations.gov.
    FAA Order 7400.11D, Airspace Designations and Reporting Points, and
subsequent amendments can be viewed on line at https://www.faa.gov/air_traffic/publications/. For further information, you can contact the
Airspace Policy Group, Federal Aviation Administration, 800
Independence Avenue SW, Washington, DC 20591; telephone: (202) 267-
8783. The Order is also available for inspection at the National
Archives and Records Administration (NARA). For information on the
availability of FAA Order 7400.11D at NARA, email<EMAIL_ADDRESS>or go to https://www.archives.gov/federal-register/cfr/ibr-locations.html.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:  John Fornito, Operations Support
Group, Eastern Service Center, Federal Aviation Administration, 1701
Columbia Avenue, College Park, GA 30337; telephone<PHONE_NUMBER>.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

Authority for This Rulemaking

    The FAA's authority to issue rules regarding aviation safety is
found in Title 49 of the United States Code. Subtitle I, Section 106
describes the authority of the FAA Administrator. Subtitle VII,
Aviation Programs, describes in more detail the scope of the agency's
authority. This rulemaking is promulgated under the authority described
in Subtitle VII, Part A, Subpart I, Section 40103. Under that section,
the FAA is charged with prescribing regulations to assign the use of
airspace necessary to ensure the safety of aircraft and the efficient
use of airspace. This regulation is within the scope of that authority
as it would amend Class E airspace in the Toccoa, GA area, to support
IFR operations in the area.

Comments Invited

    Interested persons are invited to comment on this proposed
rulemaking by submitting such written data, views, or arguments, as
they may desire. Comments that provide the factual basis supporting the
views and suggestions presented are particularly helpful in developing
reasoned regulatory decisions on the proposal. Comments are
specifically invited on the overall regulatory, aeronautical, economic,
environmental, and energy-related aspects of the proposal.
    Communications should identify both docket numbers (Docket No. FAA-
2020-0645 and Airspace Docket No. 20-ASO-18) and be submitted in
triplicate to DOT Docket Operations (see ADDRESSES section for the
address and phone number.) You may also submit comments through the
internet at https://www.regulations.gov.
    Persons wishing the FAA to acknowledge receipt of their comments on
this action must submit with those comments a self-addressed stamped
postcard on which the following statement is made: ``Comments to FAA
Docket No. FAA-2020-0645; Airspace Docket No. 20-ASO-18.'' The postcard
will be date/time stamped and returned to the commenter.
    All communications received before the specified closing date for
comments will be considered before taking action on the proposed rule.
The proposal contained in this document may be changed in light of the
comments received. All comments submitted will be available for
examination in the public docket both before and after the comment
closing date. A report summarizing each substantive public contact with
FAA personnel concerned with this rulemaking will be filed in the
docket.

Availability of NPRMs

    An electronic copy of this document may be downloaded through the
internet at http://www.regulations.gov. Recently published rulemaking
documents can also be accessed through the FAA's web page at https://www.faa.gov/air_traffic/publications/airspace_amendments/.

    You may review the public docket containing the proposal, any
comments received and any final disposition in person in the Dockets
Office (see the ADDRESSES section for address and phone number) between
9:00 a.m. and 5:00 p.m., Monday through Friday, except federal
holidays. An informal docket may also be examined between 8:00 a.m. and
4:30 p.m., Monday through Friday, except federal holidays at the office
of the Eastern Service Center, Federal Aviation Administration, Room
350, 1701 Columbia Avenue, College Park, GA 30337.

Availability and Summary of Documents for Incorporation by Reference

    This document proposes to amend FAA Order 7400.11D, Airspace
Designations and Reporting Points, dated August 8, 2019, and effective
September 15, 2019. FAA Order 7400.11D is publicly available as listed
in the ADDRESSES section of this document. FAA Order 7400.11D lists
Class A, B, C, D, and E airspace areas, air traffic service routes, and
reporting points.

The Proposal

    The FAA proposes an amendment to Title 14 Code of Federal
Regulations (14 CFR) part 71 to amend Class E airspace extending upward
from 700 feet above the surface at Toccoa RG Letourneau Field Airport,
Toccoa, GA, by eliminating the Foothills VOR/DME and the associated
extension. In addition, the FAA proposes to update the geographic
coordinates of the airport and Habersham County Airport, to coincide
with the FAA's aeronautical database.
    Class E airspace designations are published in Paragraph 6005, of
FAA Order 7400.11D, dated August 8, 2019, and effective September 15,
2019, which is incorporated by reference in 14 CFR 71.1. The Class E
airspace designations listed in this document will be published
subsequently in the Order.
    FAA Order 7400.11, Airspace Designations and Reporting Points, is
published yearly and effective on September 15.

Regulatory Notices and Analyses

    The FAA has determined that this proposed regulation only involves
an established body of technical regulations for which frequent and
routine amendments are necessary to keep them operationally current.
It, therefore: (1) Is not a ``significant regulatory action'' under
Executive Order 12866; (2) is not a ``significant rule'' under DOT
Regulatory Policies and Procedures (44 FR 11034; February 26, 1979);
and (3) does not warrant preparation of a Regulatory Evaluation as the
anticipated impact is so minimal. Since this is a routine matter that
will only affect air traffic procedures and air navigation, it is
certified that this proposed rule, when promulgated, will not have a
significant economic impact on a substantial number of small entities
under the criteria of the Regulatory Flexibility Act.

Environmental Review

    This proposal will be subject to an environmental analysis in
accordance with FAA Order 1050.1F, ``Environmental Impacts: Policies
and Procedures'' prior to any FAA final regulatory action.

Lists of Subjects in 14 CFR Part 71

    Airspace, Incorporation by reference, Navigation (air).

The Proposed Amendment

    In consideration of the foregoing, the Federal Aviation
Administration proposes to amend 14 CFR part 71 as follows:

PART 71--DESIGNATION OF CLASS A, B, C, D, AND E AIRSPACE AREAS; AIR
TRAFFIC SERVICE ROUTES; AND REPORTING POINTS

0
1. The authority citation for part 71 continues to read as follows:

    Authority: 49 U.S.C. 106(f), 106(g); 40103, 40113, 40120; E.O.
10854, 24 FR 9565, 3 CFR, 1959-1963 Comp., p. 389.

Sec.  71.1   [Amended]

0
2. The incorporation by reference in 14 CFR 71.1 of Federal Aviation
Administration Order 7400.11D, Airspace Designations and Reporting
Points, dated August 8, 2019, and effective September 15, 2019, is
amended as follows:

Paragraph 6005 Class E Airspace Areas Extending Upward from 700
feet or More Above the Surface of the Earth.

* * * * *

ASO GA E5 Toccoa, GA [Amended]

Toccoa RG Letourneau Field Airport, GA
    (Lat. 34[deg]35'34'' N, long. 83[deg]17'47'' W)
Habersham County Airport
    (Lat. 34[deg]29'59'' N, long. 83[deg]33'24'' W)

    That airspace extending upward from 700 feet or more above the
surface of the earth within a 10-mile radius of Toccoa RG Letourneau
Field, and an 8.2-mile radius of Habersham County Airport.

    Issued in College Park, Georgia, on July 22, 2020.
Andreese C. Davis,
Manager, Airspace & Procedures Team South, Eastern Service Center, Air
Traffic Organization.
[FR Doc. 2020-16296 Filed 7-30-20; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910-13-P


[Federal Register Volume 78, Number 248 (Thursday, December 26, 2013)]
[Notices]
[Pages 78467-78469]
[FR Doc No: 2013-30823]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION

Federal Aviation Administration

Office of Commercial Space Transportation; Notice of Intent to
Prepare an Environmental Impact Statement (EIS), Open a Public Scoping
Period, and Conduct a Public Scoping Meeting.

AGENCY: The Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) is the lead Federal
agency. The U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, National Aeronautics and
Space Administration, U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, and National Park
Service are cooperating agencies.

ACTION: Notice of Intent to Prepare an EIS, Open a Public Scoping
Period, and Conduct a Public Scoping Meeting

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: This Notice provides information to Federal, State, and local
agencies, Native American tribes, and other interested persons
regarding the FAA's intent to prepare an EIS that will evaluate the
potential environmental impacts associated with the issuance of a
Launch Site Operator License to Space Florida. Space Florida, an
independent special district and a subdivision of the State of Florida,
proposes to construct and operate a commercial space launch site (the
``Shiloh Launch Complex'') and two off-site operations support areas.
The Shiloh Launch Complex would include two vertical launch facilities
that would accommodate up to 24 launches per year (12 launches per
vertical launch facility), as well as up to 24 static fire engine tests
or wet dress rehearsals per year (12 static fire engine tests or wet
dress rehearsals per vertical launch facility). The launch vehicles
would include liquid fueled, medium- to heavy-lift class orbital and
suborbital vehicles. In addition to the 24 launches per year, the first
stage of the launch vehicle could return to and land at the Shiloh
Launch Complex. The proposed commercial space launch site is located on
the west side of Kennedy Parkway North (State Road [SR] 3), which
straddles Brevard and Volusia counties, Florida. Space Florida would be
required to apply for a Launch Site Operator License to be issued by
the FAA. The FAA will prepare the EIS in accordance with the National
Environmental Policy Act of 1969 (NEPA; 42 United States Code [U.S.C.]
4321 et seq.), the Council on Environmental Quality Regulations for
Implementing the Procedural Provisions of NEPA (40 Code of Federal
Regulations [CFR] parts 1500-1508), and FAA Order 1050.1E, Change 1,
Environmental Impacts: Policies and Procedures, as part of its
licensing process. Concurrent with the NEPA process, the FAA is
initiating National Historic Preservation Act Section 106 Consultation
to determine the potential effects of the Proposed Action on historic
properties. The FAA will also consult with the U.S. Fish and Wildlife
Service (USFWS) under Section 7 of the Endangered Species Act regarding
potential impacts to federally-listed threatened and endangered
species. Pursuant to the U.S. Department of Transportation Act of 1966,
this EIS will comply with the requirements of Section 4(f).

DATES: The FAA invites interested agencies, organizations, Native
American tribes, and members of the public to submit comments or
suggestions to assist in identifying significant environmental issues
and in determining the appropriate scope of the EIS. The public scoping
period starts with the publication of this notice in the Federal
Register. To ensure sufficient time to consider issues identified
during the public scoping period, comments should be submitted to Ms.
Stacey M. Zee, FAA Environmental Specialist, by one of the methods
listed below no later than February 21, 2014. All comments will receive
the same attention and consideration in the preparation of the EIS.

ADDRESSES: Comments, statements, or questions concerning scoping issues
or the EIS process should be mailed to: Ms. Stacey M. Zee, FAA
Environmental Specialist, Shiloh EIS c/o Cardno TEC Inc., 2496 Old Ivy
Road, Suite 300, Charlottesville, VA 22903.
    Comments can also be sent by email to<EMAIL_ADDRESS>or
by fax to<PHONE_NUMBER>.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

Background

    The FAA is preparing an EIS to analyze the potential environmental
impacts of the issuance of a Launch Site Operator License to Space
Florida. Space Florida proposes to construct and operate a commercial
space launch site, called the ``Shiloh Launch Complex,'' that would
allow Space Florida to offer the commercial space launch site to
commercial launch providers to conduct launch operations of liquid
fueled, medium- to heavy-lift class orbital and suborbital vertical
launch vehicles. The EIS will consider the potential environmental
impacts of the Proposed Action and reasonable alternatives, including
the No Action Alternative. The successful completion of the
environmental review process does not guarantee that the FAA would
issue a Launch Site Operator License to Space Florida. The project must
also meet all FAA safety, risk, and indemnification requirements.

Proposed Action

    The Proposed Action is for the FAA to issue a Launch Site Operator
License to Space Florida that would allow Space Florida to offer the
commercial space launch site (the ``Shiloh Launch Complex'') to
commercial launch providers to conduct launch operations of liquid
fueled, medium- to heavy-lift class orbital and suborbital vertical
launch vehicles. Under the Proposed Action, Space Florida would
construct and operate two vertical launch facilities and two off-site
operations support areas. The Shiloh Launch Complex would accommodate
up to 24 launches per year (12 launches per vertical launch facility),
as well as up to 24 static fire engine tests or wet dress rehearsals
per year (12 static fire engine tests or wet dress rehearsals per
vertical launch facility).
    The proposed Shiloh Launch Complex is located on the west side of
Kennedy Parkway North (SR 3), which straddles Brevard and Volusia
counties in Florida. The proposed site is part of the National
Aeronautics and Space Administration's (NASA) Kennedy Space Center
(KSC) in an area of the Merritt Island National Wildlife Refuge that is
managed by the USFWS. The proposed Shiloh Launch Complex would be
constructed on approximately 200 acres of undeveloped land in the
vicinity of a former citrus community known as Shiloh. Of the 200
acres, each vertical launch facility would require approximately 30
acres of fenced land. Each vertical launch facility would include a
launch pad and stand with its associated flame duct, propellant storage
and handling areas, vehicle and payload integration facility, storage
tanks, lightning protection systems, deluge water systems, and other
launch-related facilities and systems.
    In addition, as part of the Proposed Action, commercial launch
operators using the Shiloh Launch Complex would construct and operate
two off-site operations support areas in separate locations from the
Shiloh Launch Complex. Each off-site operations support area would
include a launch vehicle pre-integration processing facility, a payload
processing facility, and a control center building. There are two
proposed off-site operations support areas that are close to the Shiloh
Launch Complex: the Oak Hill site and the South Volusia County site,
both in Volusia County. The Oak Hill site is approximately 22 acres and
the South Volusia County site is approximately 51 acres. The
development of access and supporting utility infrastructure for the
vertical launch facility and the off-site operations support areas may
occur on lands outside the Shiloh Launch Complex.
    Operations would consist of up to 24 launches per year (12 launches
occurring per vertical launch facility. In addition to launches, other
operations could occur including up to 24 static fire engine tests or
wet dress rehearsals per year (12 static fire engine tests or wet dress
rehearsals per vertical launch facility). All vehicles would launch to
the east over the Atlantic Ocean. Under the Proposed Action, the first
stage of the launch vehicle could return to and land at the Shiloh
Launch Complex or it would land in the Atlantic Ocean.
    The potential environmental impacts of all proposed construction
activities will be analyzed in the EIS, in addition to the impacts from
operating the facilities and launching orbital vertical launch
vehicles. The EIS will evaluate the potential environmental effects
associated with: Air quality; noise and compatible land use; land use,
including Section 4(f) properties and farmlands; coastal resources;
biological resources, including threatened and endangered species;
water resources, including surface waters and wetlands, groundwater,
floodplains, and water quality; historical, architectural,
archaeological, and cultural resources; light emissions and visual
resources; hazardous materials, pollution prevention, and solid waste;
infrastructure and utilities; and socioeconomics, environmental
justice, and children's environmental health and safety. This includes
addressing the potential environmental impacts associated with
reasonably foreseeable changes to land administration, jurisdiction,
and management with regards to the lands at the proposed Shiloh Launch
Complex site currently administered by NASA and USFWS. The analysis
will include an evaluation of the potential direct and indirect
impacts, and will account for cumulative impacts from other relevant
activities in the area of Brevard and Volusia Counties, Florida.

Alternatives

    Based on comments received during the scoping period, the FAA may
analyze additional alternatives. However, at this time, the
alternatives under consideration include the Proposed Action and the No
Action Alternative. Under the No Action Alternative, the FAA would not
issue a Launch Site Operator License to Space Florida.

Scoping Meetings

    Two public scoping meetings will be held to solicit input from the
public on potential issues that may need to be evaluated in the EIS.
The first scoping meeting will be held on February 11, 2014 from 5:00
p.m. to 8:00 p.m., at the New Smyrna Beach High School Gymnasium, 1015
10th Street, New Smyrna Beach, Florida 32168. The second scoping
meeting will be held on February 12, 2014 from 5:00 p.m. to 8:00 p.m.,
at the Eastern Florida State College, Titusville Campus, John Henry
Jones Gymnatorium, 1311 North U.S. 1, Titusville, Florida 32796. The
meeting format will include an open-house workshop from 5:00 p.m. to
6:00 p.m. The FAA will provide an overview of the environmental process
from 6:00 p.m. to 6:15 p.m. followed by a public comment period from
6:15 p.m. to 8:00 p.m. The open-house workshop will consist of poster
stations describing the proposed project and the NEPA process. The FAA
and cooperating agency staff will be present during the open-house
workshop portion of the meetings to answer general questions on the
proposed project and the NEPA process. During each scoping meeting, one
designated area of the room will focus on the Section 106 process and
solicit public input on the identification of historic properties and
potential effects of the Proposed Action on historic properties.
    Information on the proposed project and the NEPA process is
available on the following Web site: http://www.faa.gov/about/office_org/headquarters_offices/ast/environmental/nepa_docs/review/documents_progress/shiloh_launch_statement/.

    Issued in Washington, DC on December 18, 2013.
Daniel Murray,
Manager, Space Transportation Development Division.
[FR Doc. 2013-30823 Filed 12-24-13; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910-13-P