       Supporting Statement for an Information Collection Request (ICR)
                    Under the Paperwork Reduction Act (PRA)

Part A

Section 1.  Identification of the Information Collection
1(a) Title of the Information Collection:

                                                                         Title:
TSCA Existing Chemical Risk Evaluation and Management; Generic ICR for Interviews and Focus Groups
                                                                EPA ICR Number:
2584.01
                                                            OMB Control Number:
2070-NEW
                                                              Docket ID Number:
EPA-HQ-OPPT-2018-0611
                                                              EPA Form Numbers:
NONE

1(b) Short Characterization/Abstract:

The Environmental Protection Agency (EPA or the Agency) intends to initiate a new voluntary information collection for chemical industry research involving focus groups, one-on-one interviews, and other structured discussions to provide more comprehensive and accurate information to inform the risk evaluation and risk management of existing chemicals as required under section 6 of the Toxic Substances Control Act (TSCA). In 2016, the Frank R. Lautenberg Chemical Safety for the 21[st] Century Act (LCSA), which updated TSCA, was signed into law. Under TSCA, EPA must prioritize chemical substances for risk evaluation; conduct risk evaluations to determine whether chemical substances present unreasonable risk; and manage any unreasonable risks found to be presented, all under strict statutory deadlines. Many of these chemicals may have multiple conditions of use that fall under EPA's authority under TSCA. Under TSCA, for each chemical substance evaluated, EPA must evaluate hazards and exposures.

EPA currently acquires data about chemicals under TSCA and other statutes. This information may include releases reported to the Toxics Release Inventory (TRI) (under the Emergency Planning and Community Right-To-Know Act), manufacturing (including importing) and processing information reported under the Chemical Data Reporting (CDR) rule (under TSCA section 8), and records of significant adverse reactions or notices of substantial risks submitted by chemical manufacturers, processors, or distributors under TSCA section 8. EPA also has authority under TSCA section 4 to require manufacturers and processors to conduct testing and submit data as well as other information collection authority under the statutes. EPA also uses information acquired by EPA under other statutes like the Clean Air Act and the Clean Water Act.

The purpose of this ICR is to help fill data gaps for EPA's risk evaluations and risk management of existing chemicals under section 6 of TSCA.  In accordance with TSCA section 26, EPA must make TSCA section 6 risk evaluation and risk management decisions consistent with the best available science and based on the weight of the scientific evidence.  To carry out its statutory obligations, EPA needs sufficient information about chemicals undergoing risk evaluation and risk management, including information related to the chemicals' conditions of use, hazards, exposures, potentially exposed or susceptible subpopulations, health and environmental effects, benefits, reasonably ascertainable economic consequences, alternatives, and other information. The collection of such information is subject to TSCA's strict statutory timeframes (set forth in section 6). Therefore, EPA is seeking approval for a generic information collection request (ICR) to conduct interviews and focus groups of chemical users, processors, distributors, manufacturers (including importers), and recyclers, chemical waste handlers, consumers of chemical-containing products, employees who may be exposed to the chemical evaluated, state and local regulators, non-governmental organizations, industry experts, and knowledgeable members of the public (including potentially exposed or susceptible subpopulations) related to information collection for TSCA chemical risk evaluation and risk management.

As appropriate, under this ICR EPA would collect data in several ways, such as interviews and focus groups. This research would consist of open-ended structured discussions or interviews with individuals or small groups of individuals, and therefore can provide in-depth information. These information collection efforts are intended to supplement other reasonably available information on chemicals in commerce and will provide support for the Agency's policy and regulatory activities regarding existing chemicals under TSCA section 6. Data collected under this generic clearance may be used in several ways during the risk evaluation and risk management processes, including establishing generic scenarios, developing models of various conditions of use of chemicals evaluated under TSCA or their alternatives, pretesting survey questions, and providing important context for publicly available information already available to EPA. By learning more about the conditions of use, hazards, exposures, potentially exposed or susceptible subpopulations, health and environmental effects, benefits, reasonably ascertainable economic consequences, alternatives, and other information for chemicals being evaluated or regulated, EPA would be able to more precisely and effectively carry out its risk evaluation and risk management obligations under TSCA.

Section 2.  Need For and Use of the Collection
2(a)	Need/Authority for the Collection

Over the next several years, the Agency will prioritize chemicals, conduct risk evaluations, and take appropriate risk management actions to address any unreasonable risks identified from existing chemicals. Risk evaluation and risk management efforts under TSCA require detailed information about each chemical, including information about conditions of use (such as manufacturing, import, and processing), consumption, market for, exposure to, and substitutes for each chemical evaluated and, if warranted, regulated. Though some of this information may be available to EPA through CDR, TRI, other regularly collected government data, or industry submissions under TSCA section 8(e), the currently available information is not always of sufficient completeness or detail for EPA to effectively carry out the Agency's obligations, including meeting the requirements of sections 6(c) and 26, or the timeframes mandated for EPA in section 6.

EPA will use this generic ICR to conduct interviews and focus groups of chemical users, processors, distributors, manufacturers (including importers), and recyclers, chemical waste handlers, consumers of chemical-containing products, employees exposed to the chemical evaluated (including unions), state and local regulators, non-governmental organizations, industry experts, and knowledgeable members of the public (including potentially exposed or susceptible subpopulations) who may have relevant information and are not covered by current information collection requests. The Agency will use this information collection to inform the development of any future regulatory efforts and to integrate consistent, meaningful, and transparent information into risk evaluation and risk management actions. This information is critical for adequately identifying conditions of use, conducting hazard and exposure assessments, characterizing risks, ascertaining benefits of and substitutes for each substance, estimating the economic consequences of regulation, and developing appropriate regulatory actions. Interviews and focus groups are important information-gathering tools that will allow EPA to address data gaps in current collections and more precisely evaluate and manage unreasonable risks from existing chemicals under TSCA.

Some stakeholders have recommended that EPA collect more detailed information for its risk evaluations and risk management efforts. For example, the American Chemistry Council (ACC) has asked EPA to "ensure that it is using high quality representative data that are reflective of current uses for the conditions of use that are of concern." This generic ICR is designed to respond to these stakeholder comments and help EPA acquire more detailed data for its risk evaluations and risk management efforts.

This generic ICR will support EPA's systematic review process for TSCA risk evaluations. EPA's initial work on systematic review is described in the supplemental files for the scope documents for each of the first 10 chemicals evaluated for risks under TSCA section 6. The scope documents include the Strategy for Conducting Literature Searches and the Bibliography for each chemical. The systematic review process is outlined in the Application of Systematic Review in TSCA Risk Evaluations (https://www.epa.gov/assessing-and-managing-chemicals-under-tsca/application-systematic-review-tsca-risk-evaluations), including the general steps for collecting, evaluating and integrating data/information as well as specific guidance on how to assess the quality of data/information sources.

This data collection would be carried out in conjunction with other TSCA authorities under sections 4, 8, and 11, as appropriate, and would be a key part of how EPA meets its obligations under section 6 to evaluate chemicals in commerce and to address any unreasonable risks presented by these chemicals. The materials prepared for these discussions will fully conform to federal law  -  specifically the Privacy Act of 1974 (5 U.S.C. 552a), the Hawkins-Stafford Amendments of 1988 (P.L 100-297), and the Computer Security Act of 1987.

Information acquired from this collection will be used in a manner consistent with EPA's TSCA section 26(h) requirements to use information in a manner consistent with the best available science.  Where reasonably possible and appropriate, EPA will supplement voluntary information collection with data collection from independent sources.  When applicable, EPA will request that submitters provide full studies, as well as underlying data wherever reasonably available or obtainable.

2(b)	Practical Utility/Users of the Data

EPA currently uses information on chemicals, including (but not limited to) information collected through the CDR, TRI, section 8, section 4, and section 11(c), to (1) characterize manufacture (including import), processing, distribution, use, and disposal of chemical substances and mixtures; (2) determine hazards to humans and the environment; (3) identify possible routes of human or environmental exposure; (4) prioritize chemicals as high priority for risk evaluation or low priority; (5) evaluate the risks to humans and the environment; (6) determine whether risks presented by chemicals are unreasonable; and (7) develop appropriate regulatory actions to address those risks, among other actions. In general, current information sources either provide basic exposure information about large numbers of chemicals (CDR and TRI), or anecdotal information about smaller numbers of chemicals (section 8(e)). Current information sources are important as a source of basic information to inform initial risk evaluation efforts once a chemical has been selected for risk evaluation.  Once a chemical has been selected for evaluation under TSCA, EPA's Office of Pollution Prevention and Toxics (OPPT) proposes conducting surveys using this ICR to gain more detailed information about that chemical for risk evaluation, and if necessary, risk management. Information collected in surveys from this generic ICR will supplement current information from CDR and TRI and provide EPA with more granular, complete, and up-to-date information about chemicals and the chemical industry, allowing EPA to more precisely evaluate and manage the risks from chemicals evaluated under TSCA. Information from interviews and focus groups will be part of EPA's comprehensive efforts to obtain information necessary to meet its statutory obligations.

CDR collects basic exposure-related information on the types, quantities, and uses of chemical substances produced domestically and imported into the United States. It constitutes the most comprehensive source of basic screening-level, exposure-related information on chemicals available to EPA. CDR is collected every four years from manufacturers and importers of certain chemicals when production volumes are 25,000 pounds or greater at any single site for any year leading up to the reporting year (or 2,500 pounds if the chemical is subject to certain TSCA actions). While CDR provides valuable information on chemical manufacturing in the United States, EPA has found that the collection of additional information has been useful in understanding the details of the information submitted to CDR, as part of the characterization of the exposures expected from chemicals currently under risk evaluation. General use information is collected under CDR; however, in some instances, EPA might find that additional information is useful to conduct a detailed exposure assessment.

TRI tracks the management of a specific list of toxic chemicals that may pose a threat to human health and the environment. U.S. facilities in different industry sectors must report annually how much of each chemical is released to the environment and/or managed through recycling, energy recovery, and treatment. EPA often uses TRI information to characterize exposure as part of the TSCA risk evaluation process. In some instances, EPA might find additional information useful to characterize expected exposures to the general population, or to occupational, consumer, or ecological populations. EPA may also want to collect additional information to better understand how exposures are distributed throughout the year and how much of these TRI-reported releases might affect workers.

Section 4(a)(2)(A)(i) of TSCA allows EPA to require testing by rule, order, or consent agreement if, for example, EPA determines the information is necessary to perform a risk evaluation under section 6(b) of TSCA.  Information collected through Section 4 will usually be that for which there is a standard test protocol.  That information is likely to be different than the wide variety of types of information EPA would gather through surveys under this generic ICR.  A survey under this generic ICR will usually include a variety of questions specific to a chemical and condition of use and will both be pre-tested with a small group of respondents and subject to public comment, which may be unlikely (and in some cases inappropriate) uses of Section 4. However, there may be cases where the Section 4 and this ICR could be used to gather similar information. Section 8(d) of TSCA allows EPA to promulgate rules to require chemical manufacturers, processors, and distributors to submit to EPA lists and copies of necessary health and safety studies to carry out the purposes of TSCA.  This information may not be available for all chemicals under risk evaluation and is limited to completed health and safety studies.

Section 8(e) of TSCA requires chemical manufacturers, processors, and distributors to notify EPA if they obtain information which reasonably supports the conclusion that the chemical they manufacture, process, or distribute presents a substantial risk of injury to health or the environment. This information may not be available for all chemicals under risk evaluation.

Section 11(c) of TSCA allows EPA to require by subpoena the production of reports, papers, documents, answers to questions, and other information that EPA deems necessary.  In some cases, this could be used to require that the type of information potentially subject to this ICR be provided to the Agency.  However, this could be very time-consuming and expensive, since a subpoena would have to be enforced by a district court if the entity receiving the subpoena failed or refused to comply.  EPA would also expect to engage in efforts to obtain information voluntarily before proceeding to the use of section 11(c) authority.  Section 11(c) would also require a regular ICR if more than nine entities covered by the Paperwork Reduction Act received a subpoena.  This ICR is a voluntary method to survey large numbers of entities.

While the information collected under this ICR could be used by OPPT, other EPA program offices are also potential users of data from this generic ICR to the extent these offices regulate chemicals and the chemical industry. Other federal agencies that regulate chemical manufacturing and use, such as the Occupational Safety and Health Administration (OSHA) and the Consumer Product Safety Commission (CPSC), may also use the information generated by this generic ICR. Additionally, interviews and focus groups conducted under this ICR could be used to inform survey questions or concepts (the subject of Part B of this ICR).

The information collected under this ICR will be an important part of EPA's risk evaluation and risk management processes, as required under section 6 of TSCA. In exposure assessments, data from this ICR could be used to (1) evaluate findings derived from modeled results and data from monitoring or enforcement activities, (2) help determine what data are needed to estimate exposures for evaluated conditions of use and (3) improve understanding of these conditions of use, allowing for more accurate characterization of risks. As part of risk management for any risks found to be unreasonable, EPA is required (under section 6(c)(2)) to, among other things, consider the costs and benefits of a proposed regulatory action and at least one alternative regulatory option, and in certain circumstances, consider, to the extent practicable, whether technically and economically feasible alternatives that benefit health or the environment will be reasonably available as a substitute. Data from this ICR will be used to help (1) determine and describe alternatives and (2) properly characterize the costs and benefits of each regulatory action and alternative actions.  EPA will cite to information provided from this generic ICR as appropriate in risk evaluation and risk management documents.

Section 3.  Non duplication, Consultations, and Other Collection Criteria
3(a)	Non duplication

Data generated from this generic ICR will assist EPA in identifying, evaluating and managing health and environmental risks of chemical substances. This voluntary collection will provide interested parties with a clear and effective way of communicating the nuances of their chemical manufacture, processing, distribution, use, or disposal practices to EPA, and will provide EPA with details of and context for already existing chemical information, which will allow for more accurate risk evaluation and more effective risk management.

EPA has developed procedures that will be met to make sure that the information from this generic ICR pertaining to risk evaluation and risk management of chemicals under TSCA does not duplicate other activities or impose a burden on industry that outweighs the need for the data. These procedures are:
 utilization to the fullest extent of information already available to the Agency, including through databases such as CDR and TRI, and through reporting already required under TSCA section 8(e);
 consultation with other federal agencies to make sure that information requested does not duplicate information already in the possession of the federal government and that EPA can gain access to any relevant information held by other federal agencies;
 continuing use of public meeting and outreach opportunities;
 continuing evaluation of the information collection and management activities, including feedback from affected entities about burden estimates and methods for reducing burden; and
 careful management of the collected information, including appropriate dissemination within EPA to utilize all information to the fullest extent and avoid the need for additional collections.

This ICR will generally not be used for hazard information because hazard information is generally chemical- (and not use-) specific.  In general, EPA will ask a single manufacturer or processor for hazard information about a chemical.  Therefore, voluntary requests for hazard information will generally not require contacting more than nine respondents and therefore will not require the use of an ICR.

For conditions of use, exposure, and PESS information, the data/information collected from interviews and focus groups under this generic ICR may be used to fill important information gaps discovered during the systematic review process of each chemical risk evaluation. To avoid duplication, EPA will check a variety of use and exposure information sources before conducting surveys under this generic ICR. These sources include, but are not limited to, data from other EPA offices outside of OPPT and from other government sources like the National Institute of Occupational Safety and Health (NIOSH), OSHA, and the Agency for Toxic Substances and Disease Registry (ATSDR), as well as data from generally non-governmental sources like the American Conference of Governmental Industrial Hygienists (ACGIH) and other Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD) countries. EPA will also conduct a literature search for relevant peer-reviewed and non-peer reviewed (gray) literature such as theses, dissertations, technical reports, guideline studies, conference proceedings, publicly-available industry reports, trade association resources and government reports.  EPA may also contact a limited number of industry groups and others knowledgeable about conditions of use, exposure, and PESS information.

For alternatives and other information relevant to risk management, EPA will conduct an extensive review of relevant sources from the systematic review, as well as a systematic search of peer-reviewed and gray literature. Interviews and focus groups from this ICR may then be used to help fulfill the requirements of TSCA section 6(c)(2)(C) in instances where a certain type of risk management is expected, which requires that EPA consider "to the extent practicable, whether technically and economically feasible alternatives that benefit health or the environment, compared to the use so proposed to be prohibited or restricted, will be reasonably available as a substitute when the proposed prohibition or other restriction takes effect."

It is not expected that any of the information to be submitted to EPA during these interviews or focus groups is duplicative or is already in the possession of the Federal Government. The agency anticipates that proposed interviews and focus groups could be used to address the needs of the Agency and significantly improve EPA's ability to refine its analysis and to evaluate and manage risks from chemicals evaluated under TSCA.

3(b)	Public Notice Required Prior to ICR Submission to OMB

On August 5, 2019 (84 FR 38029), EPA sought comments on this ICR pursuant to 5 CFR 1320.8(d). EPA received 7 comments, which are available in the docket and summarized in Attachment A, along with EPA's responses to those comments.

3(c) 	Consultations

Under 5 CFR 1320.8(d)(1), OMB requires agencies to consult with potential ICR respondents and data users about specific aspects of the ICR before submitting an ICR to OMB for review and approval. In accordance with this regulatory requirement, EPA submitted questions by e-mail to potential ICR respondents and data users. A copy of that email is included in Attachment B, along with the list of individuals contacted. EPA received 5 responses, which are available in the docket and summarized in Attachment A, along with EPA's responses to the feedback that was provided.

3(d)	Effects of Less Frequent Collection

The information collection activities under this generic ICR will be ad hoc and will occur only on those occasions where information would be useful for EPA to evaluate and manage unreasonable risks of chemicals under TSCA, and the information is not in the possession of EPA after a comprehensive search of the relevant databases. As such, less frequent collection is not possible.

3(e)	General Guidelines

Information will be collected according to the guidelines in 5 CFR 1320. Participation will be voluntary under this generic ICR. There will be complete protection of any demographic information collected from participants -- full names, phone numbers, and addresses will not be associated with responses.

3(f)	Confidentiality

Respondents may claim information submitted as part of an interview or focus groups as confidential.  EPA will ask during the interview or focus group whether any information provided is confidential.  EPA generally treats this information as obtained under TSCA, such that confidentiality claims are subject to the provisions of TSCA section 14.  Information on the requirements for asserting confidential business information (CBI) claims under section 14 of TSCA can be found at https://www.epa.gov/tsca-cbi/making-cbi-claims-tsca-submissions. EPA will disclose information that is covered by a claim of confidentiality only to the extent permitted by, and in accordance with, the procedures in TSCA section 14 and the regulations at 40 CFR part 2, under which EPA will provide advance notice and an opportunity to object prior to public disclosure.

EPA intends to generate public versions of the information submitted as part of an interview or focus group.  These versions will not include information claimed as confidential by the respondents.  EPA may use information claimed as confidential in averages, ranges, aggregates, or in other ways that properly mask specific information claimed as confidential and/or a trade secret. If EPA receives a Freedom of Information Act request for the information, the Agency will determine whether the information is entitled to confidential treatment in accordance with TSCA Section 14 and procedures at 40 CFR part 2, as applicable. EPA will request that companies create sanitized versions of anything they submit in writing.

EPA takes stringent measures to protect CBI submitted in connection with TSCA pursuant to 40 CFR part 2 and the "TSCA CBI Protection Manual".  These procedures include security clearances and training for all staff permitted to access TSCA CBI, storage of TSCA CBI in secured areas, computer security for TSCA CBI, secure methods for creating, transferring, and destroying TSCA CBI, and advance notice of disclosure to contractors (usually via the Federal Register) where such disclosure is authorized. In addition, each interview and focus group will fully conform to federal law  -  specifically the Privacy Act of 1974 (5 U.S.C. 552a), the Hawkins-Stafford Amendments of 1988 (P.L. 100-297), and the Computer Security Act of 1987.

3(g) 	Sensitive Questions

No questions will be asked that are of a personal or sensitive nature.

Section 4.  The Respondents and the Information Requested
4(a)	Respondents/SIC Codes

The target population for the interviews and focus groups will vary by project and chemical, but may include chemical users, processors, manufacturers (including importers), recyclers, chemical waste handlers, consumers of chemical-containing products, employees who may be exposed to the chemical evaluated, state and local regulators, non-governmental organizations, industry experts, and knowledgeable members of the public (including potentially exposed or susceptible subpopulations). As such, there are no typical respondent NAICS codes and the respondents will vary depending on the conditions of use of each chemical under consideration.

4(b)	Information Requested

There are no recordkeeping requirements associated with this generic ICR and potential respondent activities and information collected will vary based on the approach taken and the nature of the information needed.

Respondents will be asked to participate in a structured (in the case of focus groups, moderated) discussion concerning a chemical or chemicals being evaluated or managed under TSCA, which may include questions about the chemical's conditions of use, consumption, market, exposure, or substitutes, among other information.

Section 5.  The Information Collected  -  Agency Activities, Collection Methodology, and Information Management
5(a) Agency Activities

Agency activities associated with this information collection will include:
 Deciding who the respondents will be;
 Drafting interview and focus group scripts and accompanying materials;
 Conducting interviews and observing and moderating focus group discussions;
 Summarizing focus group results and making changes to draft materials as appropriate;
 Analyzing claims of confidentiality and providing appropriate protections; and
 Summarizing, analyzing, and storing interview and focus group responses.

5(b) Collection Methodology and Management

Focus group studies are directed group discussions that do not produce statistically valid data, but which enable skilled observers to infer the underlying views and assumptions of the group that are expressed in the discussion. To facilitate interpretation, discussions are generally recorded and videotaped so that both a visual record and written transcript of the discussion are available for review. Participants are informed in advance that the sessions will be recorded. Transcripts and video tapes will be maintained in individual project files.

For interviews, notes will be taken and available for review.

Interview and focus group summaries may be used to inform risk evaluations, economic analyses, and other risk management activities, subject to relevant confidentiality protections.

5(c) Small Entity Flexibility

Information may be collected from small businesses, small organizations or small governmental jurisdictions as part of this information collection. None of these interviews or focus groups will be mandatory, and EPA will work to ensure flexibility for small businesses, small organizations, and small governmental jurisdictions.

5(d) Collection Schedule

Focus groups and interviews will be scheduled according to the needs of individual projects. No firm schedule for this collection can be established otherwise.

Section 6.  Estimating the Burden and Cost of Collection
6(a)	Estimating Respondent Burden and Costs

Estimates of respondent burden were derived from projected interview and focus group usage over the next three years. To do this, EPA estimated the number of risk evaluations for chemicals evaluated under TSCA and the number of interviews and focus groups useful to gain information to evaluate these chemicals and develop regulatory actions to manage any unreasonable risk. The total estimated hourly burden imposed by this collection of information over the next three years for interviews and focus groups is approximately 710 hours or approximately 237 hours annually. The total burden per year is valued at approximately $18,296. There are no capital costs or operating and maintenance costs associated with this collection. There are about 238 respondents per year. This is derived by taking the approximate number of risk evaluations multiplied by the average number of interviews and focus groups per risk evaluation and again multiplying by the average number of participants per interview and focus group respectively. The total number of respondents for the 3-year collection would be about 714.

Labor costs in this statement have been updated using the most recently available revised wage rates and information on benefits costs. These wage rates are taken from the Bureau of Labor Statistics (BLS) Employer Costs for Employee Compensation Supplemental Tables: December 2006-December 2017 (released in March 2018) and are from private manufacturing industries. The clerical wages are taken from the BLS data for "office and administrative support." The technical wages are taken from the BLS data for "professional and related." The managerial wages are taken from the BLS data for "management, business and financial." Labor wage rates and hourly benefit costs taken from those sources have been used to calculate the labor cost to respondents, as shown below. The hourly overhead is calculated as 17 percent of the base wage. This approach is used for consistency with Office of Pollution Prevention and Toxics economics practices and is based on the analysis in Wage Rates for Economic Analyses of the Toxics Release Inventory Program, Cody Rice, U.S. EPA, Office of Pollution Prevention and Toxics, Economic and Policy Analysis Branch, June 10, 2002. The 2017 hourly industry wages used for this ICR are presented in the following table.

Table 1: Industry Hourly Labor Costs (2017$)
Wage Component
Technical
Managerial
Hourly Wage Rate
$45.82
$46.59
Benefit Costs
$24.33
$22.16
Fringe and Overhead Factor
1.70
1.65
Total Hourly Cost
$77.94
$76.67

These labor costs are multiplied by the estimated burden hours per activity and added to any non-labor costs to develop total unit costs per report.

EPA assumes that the burden of focus groups and interviews is split evenly among technical and managerial personnel.

EPA is required to evaluate the risks of at least twenty existing chemicals starting in 2019, with a requirement to complete these risk evaluations within three and a half years of beginning the risk evaluation. To support this, EPA assumes that an average of twenty interviews and two focus groups with seven participants each will be needed per risk evaluation. EPA assumes that each interview would require an average of 0.5 hours and each focus group would require 1.7 hours. The average focus group size and duration is the same as that assumed for focus groups done through the Office of Policy in their generic ICR (EPA ICR No. 2205.04).

Table 2: Average Respondent Burden and Costs[1]
                               Type of Response
                Approximate Number of Evaluations (Three Years)
                         Average Events per Evaluation
                        Average Respondents per Event
         Average Hours of Duration for Each Event (includes screening)
                            Total Estimated Burden
                           Over Next 3 Years (hours)
                                Total Estimated
                              Burden per Year ($)

Interviews

                                      21

                                      20

                                       1

                                      0.5

                                      210

                                    $5,411

Focus Groups

                                      21

                                       2

                                       7

                                      1.7

                                      500

                                    $12,884
Total Respondent Burden
                                      710
                                    $18,296
[1] There are no capital costs or operating and maintenance costs associated with this collection of information.

6(b)	Estimating Agency Burden and Costs

The Agency incurs costs to conduct interviews, develop focus group materials, and organize, conduct, and observe focus group discussions. These expenses will vary by specific project. The table below provides an estimate of costs per-year. EPA person-costs are estimated using an hourly rate for a GS-13 (step 5) based in Washington, DC in 2017. Time spent on each step may vary as well as the GS level of the employees involved. Contractor costs will also depend on the location of focus groups, degree of involvement in materials preparation, and whether written transcripts of each focus group are required. The estimates presented below assume that the Agency prepares all materials and that approximately 3 individuals observe each focus group. EPA assume that the contractor costs for each focus group would be half of the cost of the Office of Policy focus groups because the focus groups for TSCA existing chemicals would ask experts their observations about the chemical at issue rather than (as the Office of Policy does) asking broad questions regarding public opinion on economic subjects. The total agency burden and cost per year will be approximately $93,264.

Table 3: Estimated Average Annual Agency Burden and Costs for Focus Groups & Interviews
Task
          Costs (and Person-hours) Per Focus Group or Interview Hour
                             Total Hours and Cost

                                      EPA
                                   ($82.37/
                                     Hour)
                         Estimated Contractor Costs[1]
                                 O&M Cost
                Number of Focus Group or Interview Hours/Year.
                                Total Cost/Year
Prepare Materials for Focus Group Discussion
                                     $824
                                   (10 hrs)

                                      --

                                      --

                                      24

                                    $19,769
Organize and Conduct Focus Group Discussion
(Contractor)
                                      --

                                    $2,500

                                      --

                                      24

                                    $60,000
Observe Focus Group Discussion
                                     $247
                                    (3 hrs)
                                      --
                                      --
                                      24
                                    $1,977
Interview
                                      $82
                                    (1 hrs)

                                      140
                                    $11,518
Total
   $93,264
Notes: [1]includes recruiting respondents, meeting space, travel reimbursement for approximately 7 participants, and recording of discussion.

6(c)	Bottom Line Burden Hours and Cost Tables

EPA expects respondent hours to total 710 over the next 3 years or 237 each year. These hours will be spread over approximately 420 interviews and 42 focus groups over the next 3 yrs.

Table 5: Annual Respondent and Agency Burden and Costs

Activity
                             Total Events Per Year
                               Respondent Burden
                               Respondent Costs
                                 Agency Burden
                                 Agency Costs

                                   Per Event
                                     (Hrs)
                                 Annual (Hrs)
                                 Per Event ($)
                                  Annual ($)
                                   Per Event
                                     (Hrs)
                                 Annual (Hrs)
                                 Per Event ($)
                                  Annual ($)
Interviews
                                      140
                                      0.5
                                      70
                                      $39
                                    $5,411
                                       1
                                      140
                                      $82
                                    $11,518
Focus Groups
                                      14
                                      1.7
                                      167
                                     $920
                                    $12,884
                                      22
                                      309
                                    $5,839
                                    $81,746
                                    Totals
                                      154

                                      237

                                    $18,296

                                    $93,264

As indicated previously, since the information activities covered by this ICR do not involve recordkeeping or management and operations activities, there are no burden or costs associated with those activities.

6(f)	Reasons for Change in Burden

This ICR will cover a new collection activity.

6(g) 	Burden Statement

The annual public reporting burden for this collection of information is estimated to average 0.99 hours per response. There are no recordkeeping burdens.

Burden means the total time, effort, or financial resources expended by persons to generate, maintain, retain, or disclose or provide information to or for a Federal agency. This includes the time needed to review instructions; develop, acquire, install, and utilize technology and systems for the purposes of collecting, validating, and verifying information, processing and maintaining information, and disclosing and providing information; adjust the existing ways to comply with any previously applicable instructions and requirements; train personnel to be able to respond to a collection of information; search data sources; complete and review the collection of information; and transmit or otherwise disclose the information. An Agency may not conduct or sponsor, and a person is not required to respond to, a collection of information unless it displays a currently valid OMB control number. The OMB control numbers for EPA's regulations are listed in 40 CFR Part 9 and 48 CFR Chapter 15.

Attachments
Attachments to the supporting statement are available in the public docket established for this ICR (Docket ID #: EPA-HQ-OPPT-2018-0611) at http://www.regulations.gov.

Attachment A
     Public Comments on Proposed ICR and EPA Responses to Public Comments

Attachment B
E-mails Sent for Consultation and List of Organizations Consulted


[Federal Register: May 27, 2009 (Volume 74, Number 100)]
[Notices]
[Page 25234]
[DOCID:fr27my09-28]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission

[Docket Nos. QF88-110-006, EL09-54-000]

Ripon Cogeneration, LLC; Notice of Filing

May 19, 2009.
    Take notice that on May 12, 2009, Ripon Cogeneration, LLC filed a
petition for limited waiver of the operating and efficiency standards
for a topping-cycle qualifying cogeneration facility located in Ripon,
San Joaquin County, California for years 2009 and 2010, pursuant to
subsections 209.205(c) and 209.205(a) of the Commission's Regulations,
18 CFR 292.205(a) and 18 CFR 29.205(a).
    Any person desiring to intervene or to protest this filing must
file in accordance with Rules 211 and 214 of the Commission's Rules of
Practice and Procedure (18 CFR 385.211, 385.214). Protests will be
considered by the Commission in determining the appropriate action to
be taken, but will not serve to make protestants parties to the
proceeding. Any person wishing to become a party must file a notice of
intervention or motion to intervene, as appropriate. Such notices,
motions, or protests must be filed on or before the comment date. On or
before the comment date, it is not necessary to serve motions to
intervene or protests on persons other than the Applicant.
    The Commission encourages electronic submission of protests and
interventions in lieu of paper using the ``eFiling'' link at http://
www.ferc.gov. Persons unable to file electronically should submit an
original and 14 copies of the protest or intervention to the Federal
Energy Regulatory Commission, 888 First Street, NE., Washington, DC
20426.
    This filing is accessible on-line at http://www.ferc.gov, using the
``eLibrary'' link and is available for review in the Commission's
Public Reference Room in Washington, DC. There is an ``eSubscription''
link on the Web site that enables subscribers to receive e-mail
notification when a document is added to a subscribed docket(s). For
assistance with any FERC Online service, please e-mail
<EMAIL_ADDRESS>or call<PHONE_NUMBER> (toll free). For
TTY, call<PHONE_NUMBER>.
    Comment Date: 5 p.m. Eastern Time on June 11, 2009.

Kimberly D. Bose,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. E9-12211 Filed 5-26-09; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 6717-01-P


[Federal Register Volume 81, Number 132 (Monday, July 11, 2016)]
[Notices]
[Pages 44856-44858]
[FR Doc No: 2016-16238]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission

Combined Notice of Filings #2

    Take notice that the Commission received the following electric
corporate filings:

    Docket Numbers: EC16-137-000.
    Applicants: American Transmission Company LLC.
    Description: Application for Authorization Pursuant to Section 203
of the FPA American Transmission Company LLC.
    Filed Date: 6/30/16.
    Accession Number: 20160630-5286.
    Comments Due: 5 p.m. ET 7/21/16.

    Docket Numbers: EC16-138-000.
    Applicants: Effingham County Power, LLC, SEPG Energy Marketing
Services, LLC, Washington County Power, LLC.
    Description: Application for Authorization Pursuant to Section 203
of the FPA of Effingham County Power, LLC, et al.
    Filed Date: 6/30/16.
    Accession Number: 20160630-5280.
    Comments Due: 5 p.m. ET 7/21/16.

    Take notice that the Commission received the following electric
rate filings:

    Docket Numbers: ER10-2757-006; ER10-2756-006.
    Applicants: Arlington Valley, LLC, Griffith Energy LLC.
    Description: Triennial Market Power Update for the Southwest Region
of Arlington Valley, LLC, et al.
    Filed Date: 6/30/16.
    Accession Number: 20160630-5189.
    Comments Due: 5 p.m. ET 8/29/16.

    Docket Numbers: ER15-1596-002; ER15-1599-002; ER15-1598-002; ER11-
4400-006; ER11-4398-005; ER10-2616-009; ER10-2593-004 ER10-2590-004.
    Applicants: Dynegy Commercial Asset Management, LLC, Dynegy Energy
Services (East), LLC, Dynegy Marketing and Trade, LLC, Dynegy Midwest
Generation, LLC, Dynegy Moss Landing, LLC, Dynegy Oakland, LLC, Dynegy
Power Marketing, LLC, Dynegy Resources Management, LLC.
    Description: Updated Market Power Analysis for the Southwest Region
of Dynegy Commercial Asset Management, LLC, et al.
    Filed Date: 6/30/16.
    Accession Number: 20160630-5216.
    Comments Due: 5 p.m. ET 8/29/16.

    Docket Numbers: ER16-1211-002.
    Applicants: Midcontinent Independent System Operator, Inc.
    Description: Compliance filing: 2016-06-30_SA 2906 IPL-IPL GIA
(J401) Compliance to be effective 3/18/2016.
    Filed Date: 6/30/16.
    Accession Number: 20160630-5154.
    Comments Due: 5 p.m. ET 7/21/16.

    Docket Numbers: ER16-2075-000.
    Applicants: Avista Corporation.
    Description: Compliance filing: Avista Corp Order 819 Compliance
Filing to be effective 7/1/2016.
    Filed Date: 6/30/16.
    Accession Number: 20160630-5000.
    Comments Due: 5 p.m. ET 7/21/16.

    Docket Numbers: ER16-2076-000.
    Applicants: Puget Sound Energy, Inc.
    Description: Section 205(d) Rate Filing: MBR Tariff Revisions re
784 & 819 to be effective 7/1/2016.
    Filed Date: 6/30/16.
    Accession Number: 20160630-5035.
    Comments Due: 5 p.m. ET 7/21/16.

    Docket Numbers: ER16-2077-000.
    Applicants: Badger Creek Limited.
    Description: Market-Based Triennial Review Filing: Southwest
Triennial & 819 Revisions to be effective 7/1/2016.
    Filed Date: 6/30/16.
    Accession Number: 20160630-5047.
    Comments Due: 5 p.m. ET 8/29/16.

    Docket Numbers: ER16-2078-000.
    Applicants: Bear Mountain Limited.
    Description: Market-Based Triennial Review Filing: Southwest
Triennial & 819 Revisions to be effective 7/1/2016.
    Filed Date: 6/30/16.
    Accession Number: 20160630-5049.
    Comments Due: 5 p.m. ET 8/29/16.

    Docket Numbers: ER16-2079-000.
    Applicants: Chalk Cliff Limited.
    Description: Market-Based Triennial Review Filing: Southwest
Triennial & 819 Revisions to be effective 7/1/2016.
    Filed Date: 6/30/16.
    Accession Number: 20160630-5050.
    Comments Due: 5 p.m. ET 8/29/16.

    Docket Numbers: ER16-2080-000.
    Applicants: Midcontinent Independent System Operator, Inc., Ameren
Illinois Company.
    Description: Section 205(d) Rate Filing: 2016-06-30_SA 1975 Ameren-
Norris 5th Rev WDS Agreement to be effective 6/1/2016.
    Filed Date: 6/30/16.
    Accession Number: 20160630-5051.
    Comments Due: 5 p.m. ET 7/21/16.

    Docket Numbers: ER16-2081-000.
    Applicants: Double C Generation Limited Partnership.
    Description: Market-Based Triennial Review Filing: Southwest
Triennial & 819 Revisions to be effective 7/1/2016.
    Filed Date: 6/30/16.
    Accession Number: 20160630-5055.
    Comments Due: 5 p.m. ET 8/29/16.

    Docket Numbers: ER16-2082-000.
    Applicants: High Sierra Limited.
    Description: Market-Based Triennial Review Filing: Southwest
Triennial & 819 Revisions to be effective 7/1/20160.
    Filed Date: 6/30/16.
    Accession Number: 20160630-5058.
    Comments Due: 5 p.m. ET 8/29/16.

    Docket Numbers: ER16-2083-000.
    Applicants: Kern Front Limited.
    Description: Market-Based Triennial Review Filing: Southwest
Triennial & 819 Revisions to be effective 7/1/2016.
    Filed Date: 6/30/16.
    Accession Number: 20160630-5062.
    Comments Due: 5 p.m. ET 8/29/16.

    Docket Numbers: ER16-2084-000.
    Applicants: Live Oak Limited.
    Description: Market-Based Triennial Review Filing: Southwest
Triennial & 819 Revisions to be effective 7/1/2016.
    Filed Date: 6/30/16.
    Accession Number: 20160630-5066.
    Comments Due: 5 p.m. ET 8/29/16.

    Docket Numbers: ER16-2085-000.
    Applicants: McKittrick Limited.
    Description: Market-Based Triennial Review Filing: Southwest
Triennial & 819 Revisions to be effective 7/1/2016.
    Filed Date: 6/30/16.
    Accession Number: 20160630-5067.
    Comments Due: 5 p.m. ET 8/29/16.

    Docket Numbers: ER16-2086-000.
    Applicants: Cabazon Wind Partners, LLC.
    Description: Market-Based Triennial Review Filing: Southwest
Triennial & 819 Revisions to be effective 7/1/2016.
    Filed Date: 6/30/16.
    Accession Number: 20160630-5089.
    Comments Due: 5 p.m. ET 8/29/16.

    Docket Numbers: ER16-2087-000.
    Applicants: Griffith Energy LLC.
    Description: Compliance filing: Revised Market Based Rate Tariff
for Order 819 to be effective 8/29/2016.
    Filed Date: 6/30/16.
    Accession Number: 20160630-5090.
    Comments Due: 5 p.m. ET 7/21/16.

    Docket Numbers: ER16-2088-000.
    Applicants: Arlington Valley, LLC.
    Description: Compliance filing: Revised Market Based Rate Tariff
for Order 819 to be effective 8/29/2016.
    Filed Date: 6/30/16.
    Accession Number: 20160630-5091.
    Comments Due: 5 p.m. ET 7/21/16.

    Docket Numbers: ER16-2089-000.
    Applicants: Whitewater Hill Wind Partners, LLC.
    Description: Market-Based Triennial Review Filing: Southwest
Triennial & 819 Revisions to be effective 7/1/2016.
    Filed Date: 6/30/16.
    Accession Number: 20160630-5101.
    Comments Due: 5 p.m. ET 8/29/16.

    Docket Numbers: ER16-2090-000.
    Applicants: Avista Corporation.
    Description: Section 205(d) Rate Filing: Avista Corp OATT Cost of
Capacity Filing to be effective 9/1/2016.
    Filed Date: 6/30/16.
    Accession Number: 20160630-5108.
    Comments Due: 5 p.m. ET 7/21/16.

    Docket Numbers: ER16-2091-000.
    Applicants: Idaho Power Company
    Description: Market-Based Triennial Review Filing: 2016 Market
Based Rate Triennial Analysis to be effective 7/1/2016.
    Filed Date: 6/30/16
    Accession Number: 20160630-5115.
    Comments Due: 5 p.m. ET 8/29/16.

    Docket Numbers: ER16-2092-000.
    Applicants: Southwest Power Pool, Inc.
    Description: Section 205(d) Rate Filing: 1976R5 Kaw Valley Electric
Cooperative, Inc. NITSA and NOA to be effective 9/1/2016.
    Filed Date: 6/30/16.
    Accession Number: 20160630-5152.
    Comments Due: 5 p.m. ET 7/21/16.

    Docket Numbers: ER16-2093-000.
    Applicants: Southwest Power Pool, Inc.
    Description: Section 205(d) Rate Filing: 2900R7 KMEA NITSA NOA to
be effective 9/1/2016.

    Filed Date: 6/30/16.
    Accession Number: 20160630-5153.
    Comments Due: 5 p.m. ET 7/21/16.

    Docket Numbers: ER16-2094-000.
    Applicants: Chevron Power Holdings Inc.
    Description: Market-Based Triennial Review Filing: Southwest
Triennial & Revised Tariff to be effective 7/1/2016.
    Filed Date: 6/30/16.
    Accession Number: 20160630-5175.
    Comments Due: 5 p.m. ET 8/29/16.

    Docket Numbers: ER16-2095-000.
    Applicants: Midwest Generation, LLC.
    Description: Section 205(d) Rate Filing: Revised FERC Electric
Tariff, Original Volume No. 3 to be effective 8/1/2016.
    Filed Date: 6/30/16.
    Accession Number: 20160630-5180.
    Comments Due: 5 p.m. ET 7/21/16.

    Docket Numbers: ER16-2096-000.
    Applicants: Public Service Company of New Mexico.
    Description: Public Service Company of New Mexico submits filing
per 35.15: Notice of Cancellation of Operations and Maintenance
Agreement not filed in eTariff to be effective 07/01/2016.
    Filed Date: 6/30/16.
    Accession Number: 20160630-5184.
    Comments Due: 5 p.m. ET 7/21/16.

    Docket Numbers: ER16-2097-000.
    Applicants: Vermont Transco, LLC.
    Description: Section 205(d) Rate Filing: Vermont Transco LLC
Updated Exhibit A for the 1991 Transmission Agreement to be effective
7/1/2016.
    Filed Date: 6/30/16.
    Accession Number: 20160630-5193.
    Comments Due: 5 p.m. ET 7/21/16.

    Docket Numbers: ER16-2098-000.
    Applicants: NorthWestern Corporation.
    Description: Section 205(d) Rate Filing: SA 783--Firm Point-to-
Point TSA with Energy Keepers to be effective 9/1/2016.
    Filed Date: 6/30/16.
    Accession Number: 20160630-5246.
    Comments Due: 5 p.m. ET 7/21/16.

    Docket Numbers: ER16-2099-000.
    Applicants: PJM Interconnection, L.L.C.
    Description: Compliance filing: PJM submits revisions to OATT
Section 23.1 pursuant to Order No. 739 to be effective 10/1/2010.
    Filed Date: 6/30/16.
    Accession Number: 20160630-5247.
    Comments Due: 5 p.m. ET 7/21/16.

    Docket Numbers: ER16-2100-000.
    Applicants: Gila River Power LLC.
    Description: Market-Based Triennial Review Filing: Gila River Power
LLC Updated MBR Tariff to be effective 6/30/2016.
    Filed Date: 6/30/16.
    Accession Number: 20160630-5248.
    Comments Due: 5 p.m. ET 8/29/16.

    Docket Numbers: ER16-2101-000.
    Applicants: Entegra Power Services LLC.
    Description: Market-Based Triennial Review Filing: Entegra Power
Services LLC Updated MBR Tariff to be effective 6/30/2016.
    Filed Date: 6/30/16.
    Accession Number: 20160630-5251.
    Comments Due: 5 p.m. ET 8/29/16.

    Docket Numbers: ER16-2102-000.
    Applicants: Sentinel Energy Center, LLC.
    Description: Section 205(d) Rate Filing: Revised Market-Based Rate
Tariff Filing to be effective 8/30/2016.
    Filed Date: 6/30/16.
    Accession Number: 20160630-5253.
    Comments Due: 5 p.m. ET 7/21/16.

    Docket Numbers: ER16-2103-000.
    Applicants: Florida Power & Light Company.
    Description: Section 205(d) Rate Filing: FPL and the City of Moore
Haven NITSA and NOA to be effective 7/1/2016.
    Filed Date: 6/30/16.
    Accession Number: 20160630-5262.
    Comments Due: 5 p.m. ET 7/21/16.

    Docket Numbers: ER16-2104-000.
    Applicants: New England Power Pool Participants Committee.
    Description: Section 205(d) Rate Filing: July 2016 Membership
Filing to be effective 6/1/2016.
    Filed Date: 6/30/16.
    Accession Number: 20160630-5265.
    Comments Due: 5 p.m. ET 7/21/16.

    Docket Numbers: ER16-2105-000.
    Applicants: Castleton Power, LLC.
    Description: Market-Based Triennial Review Filing: Castleton Power
Triennial Market Review (June 2016) to be effective 7/1/2016.
    Filed Date: 6/30/16.
    Accession Number: 20160630-5281.
    Comments Due: 5 p.m. ET 8/29/16.

    Docket Numbers: ER16-2106-000.
    Applicants: Castleton Energy Services, LLC.
    Description: Market-Based Triennial Review Filing: Castleton Energy
Services Triennial Market Review (June 2016) to be effective 7/1/2016.
    Filed Date: 6/30/16.
    Accession Number: 20160630-5282.
    Comments Due: 5 p.m. ET 8/29/16.

    Docket Numbers: ER16-2107-000.
    Applicants: Sundevil Power Holdings, LLC.
    Description: Market-Based Triennial Review Filing: Sundevil
Triennial Market Review (June 2016) to be effective 7/1/2016.
    Filed Date: 6/30/16.
    Accession Number: 20160630-5283.
    Comments Due: 5 p.m. ET 8/29/16.

    Docket Numbers: ER16-2108-000.
    Applicants: West Valley Power, LLC.
    Description: Market-Based Triennial Review Filing: West Valley
Triennial Market Review (June 2016) to be effective 7/1/2016.
    Filed Date: 6/30/16.
    Accession Number: 20160630-5285.
    Comments Due: 5 p.m. ET 8/29/16.

    The filings are accessible in the Commission's eLibrary system by
clicking on the links or querying the docket number.
    Any person desiring to intervene or protest in any of the above
proceedings must file in accordance with Rules 211 and 214 of the
Commission's Regulations (18 CFR 385.211 and 385.214) on or before 5:00
p.m. Eastern time on the specified comment date. Protests may be
considered, but intervention is necessary to become a party to the
proceeding.
    eFiling is encouraged. More detailed information relating to filing
requirements, interventions, protests, service, and qualifying
facilities filings can be found at: http://www.ferc.gov/docs-filing/efiling/filing-req.pdf. For other information, call<PHONE_NUMBER>
(toll free). For TTY, call<PHONE_NUMBER>.

    Dated: June 30, 2016.
Nathaniel J. Davis, Sr.,
Deputy Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2016-16238 Filed 7-8-16; 8:45 am]
 BILLING CODE 6717-01-P


[Federal Register: July 27, 2010 (Volume 75, Number 143)]
[Notices]
[Page 44046]
[DOCID:fr27jy10-147]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION

Federal Railroad Administration

[Docket No. FRA-2000-7257; Notice No. 62]

Railroad Safety Advisory Committee; Notice of Meeting

AGENCY: Federal Railroad Administration (FRA), Department of
Transportation (DOT).

ACTION: Announcement of Railroad Safety Advisory Committee (RSAC)
Meeting.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: FRA announces the forty-second meeting of the RSAC, a Federal
advisory committee that develops railroad safety regulations through a
consensus process. The RSAC meeting topics will include opening remarks
from the FRA Administrator, and status reports will be provided by the
Passenger Hours of Service, Training Standards, Track Safety Standards,
Passenger Safety, and Medical Standards Working Groups. Status updates
will be provided on the following tasks arising out of the Rail Safety
Improvement Act of 2008 (RSIA): Positive Train Control, Railroad Bridge
Safety Management, Conductor Certification, and a possible new task
regarding Dark Territory may be presented to the committee for
approval. This agenda is subject to change, including the possible
addition of further proposed tasks under the RSIA.

DATES: The meeting of the RSAC is scheduled to commence at 9:30 a.m. on
Thursday, September 23, 2010, and will adjourn by 4:30 p.m.

ADDRESSES: The RSAC meeting will be held at the National Association of
Home Builders National Housing Center, 1201 15th Street, NW.,
Washington, DC 20005. The meeting is open to the public on a first-
come, first-served basis, and is accessible to individuals with
disabilities. Sign and oral interpretation can be made available if
requested 10 calendar days before the meeting.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Larry Woolverton, RSAC Administrative
Officer/Coordinator, FRA, 1200 New Jersey Avenue, SE., Mailstop 25,
Washington, DC 20590,<PHONE_NUMBER>; or Robert Lauby, Deputy Associate
Administrator for Regulatory and Legislative Operations, FRA, 1200 New
Jersey Avenue, SE., Mailstop 25, Washington, DC 20590,<PHONE_NUMBER>.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Pursuant to Section 10(a)(2) of the Federal
Advisory Committee Act (Pub. L. 92-463), FRA is giving notice of a
meeting of the RSAC. The RSAC was established to provide advice and
recommendations to FRA on railroad safety matters. The RSAC is composed
of 54 voting representatives from 31 member organizations, representing
various rail industry perspectives. In addition, there are non-voting
advisory representatives from the agencies with railroad safety
regulatory responsibility in Canada and Mexico, the National
Transportation Safety Board, and the Federal Transit Administration.
The diversity of the Committee ensures the requisite range of views and
expertise necessary to discharge its responsibilities. See the RSAC Web
site for details on prior RSAC activities and pending tasks at: http://
rsac.fra.dot.gov. Please refer to the notice published in the Federal
Register on March 11, 1996 (61 FR 9740) for additional information
about the RSAC.

    Issued in Washington, DC on July 21, 2010.
Robert C. Lauby,
Deputy Associate Administrator for Regulatory and Legislative
Operations.
[FR Doc. 2010-18320 Filed 7-26-10; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910-06-P