[Federal Register Volume 80, Number 81 (Tuesday, April 28, 2015)]
[Notices]
[Pages 23615-23618]
[FR Doc No: 2015-09764]

=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

[Release No. 34-74783; File No. SR-BX-2015-021]

Self-Regulatory Organizations; Notice of Filing and Immediate
Effectiveness of Proposed Rule Change by NASDAQ OMX BX, Inc. Relating
to NASDAQ OMX BX Equities Market Participant Registration and Sponsored
Access

April 22, 2015.
    Pursuant to Section 19(b)(1) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934
(``Act''),\1\ and Rule 19b-4 thereunder,\2\ notice is hereby given that
on April 16, 2015, NASDAQ OMX BX, Inc. (``BX'' or ``Exchange'') filed
with the Securities and Exchange Commission (``SEC'' or ``Commission'')
the proposed rule change as described in Items I and II, below, which
Items have been prepared by the Exchange. The Commission is publishing
this notice to solicit comments on the proposed rule change from
interested persons.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \1\ 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(1).
    \2\ 17 CFR 240.19b-4.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

I. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement of the Terms of Substance
of the Proposed Rule Change

    The Exchange proposes to amend Rule 4611, entitled ``NASDAQ OMX BX
Equities Market Participant Registration'' and adopt a new Rule 4615,
entitled ``Sponsored Participants.''
    The Exchange requests that the Commission waive the 30-day
operative

delay period contained in Exchange Act Rule 19b-4(f)(6)(iii).\3\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \3\ 17 CFR 240.19b-4(f)(6)(iii).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    The text of the proposed rule change is available on the Exchange's
Web site at http://nasdaqomxbx.cchwallstreet.com, at the principal
office of the Exchange, and at the Commission's Public Reference Room.

II. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement of the Purpose of, and
Statutory Basis for, the Proposed Rule Change

    In its filing with the Commission, the Exchange included statements
concerning the purpose of and basis for the proposed rule change and
discussed any comments it received on the proposed rule change. The
text of these statements may be examined at the places specified in
Item IV below. The Exchange has prepared summaries, set forth in
sections A, B, and C below, of the most significant aspects of such
statements.

A. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement of the Purpose of, and
Statutory Basis for, the Proposed Rule Change

1. Purpose

    The purpose of the proposed rule change is to amend Rule 4611,
entitled ``NASDAQ OMX BX Equities Market Participant Registration'' to:
(i) Amend this rule, which today applies solely to members conducting
an equities business on the Exchange, to apply to the rule text to
members conducting an options business on the Exchange; and (ii) delete
4611(d) pertaining to Sponsored Access and relocate the text to new
Rule 4615 and also apply the rule to members transacting an options
business.
    Exchange Rule 4611 today applies solely to the BX Equities market.
This rule explains the various conditions that registration with the
Exchange shall be conditioned upon initially and then subsequently
imposing a continuing obligation to comply with the requirements. The
requirements include a relationship with a clearing agency, compliance
with Rules and procedures for use of the Trading System, rules
concerning equipment usage, and compliance with rules regarding the
acceptance and settlement of a trade. Rule 4611 requires reporting of
noncompliance by the member and permits the Exchange to impose
temporary restrictions to address a system problem. At the time this
rule was adopted in 2008 the Exchange did not operate an options
market. In 2012, BX received approval to establish a new options
market.\4\ At this time, the Exchange intends to apply the provisions
of Rule 4611 to all of its members similar to the NASDAQ Stock Market
LLC (``Nasdaq') Rule 4611.\5\ The Exchange is removing all references
to ``Equities'' in Rule 4611 and adding the word ``BX,'' where
appropriate, to apply the Rule to all members of the Exchange,
including equities and options members.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \4\ See Securities Exchange Act Release No. 67256 (Jun 26,
2012), 77 FR 39277 (July 2, 2012) (SR-BX-2012-030).
    \5\ See Nasdaq Rule 4611(d).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    The Exchange also proposes to relocate the rule applicable to
Sponsored Participant from Rule 4611(d) to a new Rule 4615 to create a
separate rule and apply the rule to both equity and options members.
Today, 4611(d) refers solely to equity members of the Exchange. The
Exchange proposes to title the new rule ``Sponsored Participants.''
    A Sponsored Participant is an entity with authorized electronic
access to the Exchange for the entry and execution of orders. A
Sponsored Participant trades under a Sponsoring Member's execution and
clearing identity pursuant to a sponsorship arrangement. The rules
continue to require the Sponsoring Member to take responsibility for
the Sponsored Participant's activity on the Exchange. Similar to
current Rule 4611(d), the relocated rule text imposes the same
responsibilities as the current rule for Sponsored Participants, except
that members conducting an options business on the Exchange will also
have the ability to offer Sponsored Access.
    By way of background, new Rule 4615, similar to Rule 4611(d)
continues to require the following elements for the Sponsored Access.
First, the Sponsored Participant and its Sponsoring Member must have
entered into and maintained an Access Agreement with the Exchange. The
Sponsoring Member must designate the Sponsored Participant by name in
an addendum to the Access Agreement. Second, there must be a Sponsored
Participant Agreement between the Sponsoring Member and the Sponsored
Participant that contains certain sponsorship provisions, enumerated in
full in Rule 4615(b)(ii). The orders of the Sponsored Participant are
binding in all respects on the Sponsoring Member. The Sponsoring Member
is responsible for the actions of the Sponsored Participant. In
addition to the Sponsoring Member being required to comply with the
Exchange Certificate of Incorporation, By-Laws, Rules and procedures of
the Exchange, the Sponsored Participant shall do so as if such
Sponsored Participant were an Exchange member. The Sponsored
Participant shall maintain, keep current and provide to the Sponsoring
Member a list of individuals authorized to obtain access to the
Exchange on behalf of the Sponsored Participant. The Sponsored
Participant shall familiarize its authorized individuals with all of
the Sponsored Participant's obligations under this Rule and will assure
that they receive appropriate training prior to any use or access to
the Exchange. The Sponsored Participant may not permit anyone other
than authorized individuals to use or obtain access to the Exchange.\6\
The Sponsored Participant shall take reasonable security precautions to
prevent unauthorized use or access to the Exchange, including
unauthorized entry of information into the Exchange, and agrees that it
is responsible for any and all orders, trades and other messages and
instructions entered, transmitted or received under identifiers,
passwords and security codes of authorized individuals, and for the
trading and other consequences thereof. The Sponsored Participant
acknowledges its responsibility to establish adequate procedures and
controls that permit it to effectively monitor its employees', agents'
and Participants' use and access to the Exchange for compliance with
the terms of this agreement. Finally, the Sponsored Participant shall
pay when due all amounts, if any, payable to Sponsoring Member, the
Exchange, or any other third parties that arise from the Sponsored
Participant's access to and use of the Exchange. Such amounts include,
but are not limited to applicable exchange and regulatory fees. Third,
the Sponsoring Member must provide the Exchange with a Sponsored
Participant Addendum to its Access Agreement acknowledging its
responsibility for the orders, executions and actions of its Sponsored
Participant at issue.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \6\ If the Exchange determines that an authorized individual has
caused a Member to violate the Exchange's Rules, the Exchange could
direct the Member to suspend or withdraw the person's status as an
authorized individual.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    The Exchange would apply the Sponsored Participant rule to members
conducting an options business on the Exchange. Today the rule applies
solely to members conducting an equities business on the Exchange. The
Exchange intends to offer sponsored access in the same manner as NASDAQ

to members conducting an options and an equities business.\7\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \7\ See Nasdaq Rule 4611(d).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    The Exchange is removing all references to ``Equities'' in Rule
4611 and adding the word ``BX,'' where appropriate, to apply the Rule
to all members of the Exchange, equities and options members.
2. Statutory Basis
    The Exchange believes that its proposal is consistent with Section
6(b) of the Act \8\ in general, and furthers the objectives of Section
6(b)(5) of the Act \9\ in particular, in that it is designed to promote
just and equitable principles of trade, to remove impediments to and
perfect the mechanism of a free and open market and a national market
system, and, in general to protect investors and the public interest,
by continuing to permit market participants gain access to a
marketplace. Specifically, the Exchange believes the proposed rule
change is consistent with the Section 6(b)(5) requirements that the
rules of an exchange be designed to promote just and equitable
principles of trade, to prevent fraudulent and manipulative acts, to
foster cooperation and coordination with persons engaged in regulating,
clearing, settling, processing information with respect to, and
facilitating transactions in securities, to remove impediments to and
to perfect the mechanism for a free and open market and a national
market system, and, in general, to protect investors and the public
interest.\10\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \8\ 15 U.S.C. 78f(b).
    \9\ 15 U.S.C. 78f(b)(5).
    \10\ Id.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    With respect to Rule 4611, the proposed amendments would permit the
Rule to be equally applicable to all members of the Exchange, equity
and options. Today, the rule applies solely to equity members. The
Exchange intends to offer uniform access and permit members conducting
an equities and options business on the Exchange to similarly offer
Sponsored Access as is the case today on the Nasdaq market with new
Rule 4615.\11\ Similarly, the Exchange intends to impose equal
obligations for accessing the System on members conducting either an
equities or an options business with revised Rule 4611. The Exchange
believes that applying these rules in a uniform manner to all members
(equity and options) would result in uniform application of Exchange
rules.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \11\ See Nasdaq Rule 4611(d).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    Additionally, the Exchange believes the proposed rule changes are
consistent with the Section 6(b)(5) requirement that the rules of a
national securities exchange be designed to not permit unfair
discrimination between customer, issuers, brokers or dealers.\12\ New
Rule 4615 continues to make clear the obligations of the Sponsoring
Members.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \12\ Id.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    The Exchange believes that the changes proposed herein should serve
to help market participants seeking access to its marketplace. The
Exchange believes that proposed Rule 4615, similar to current Rule
4611(d), allows the Exchange to receive from Sponsoring Members certain
information in a uniform format, which aids the Exchange's efforts to
monitor and regulate BX's markets and its members and aids the
prevention of fraudulent and manipulative practices.
    The Exchange believes that the proposed rule change is designed to
avoid unfair discrimination among members, as the proposed rule change
provides for the Exchange to impose requirements on members in an
objective manner. The proposed amendments extend the requirements in
Rule 4611 and the access in new Rule 4615 to both equity and options
members. Finally, the proposed rule change will help remove impediments
to and promote a free and open market and a national market system
because it is consistent with rules in place at other exchanges and
imposes substantially similar requirements on its members.

B. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement on Burden on Competition

    The Exchange does not believe that the proposed rule change will
impose any burden on competition that is not necessary or appropriate
in furtherance of the purposes of the Act. Rule 4611 obligations would
apply uniformly to both equity and options members. Similarly, new Rule
4615 will treat all members, equity and options members, in a uniform
fashion. The proposed rule change seeks to provide clear guidelines on
the responsibilities of all parties that provide Sponsored Access as
well as the responsibilities owed by Sponsored Members. The proposed
rule is similar to other exchange rules.
    The proposed rule change does not impose any undue burden on
competition, rather it seeks to uniformly apply both Rule 4611 and new
Rule 4615 to all members, equity and options.

C. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement on Comments on the Proposed
Rule Change Received From Members, Participants, or Others

    No written comments were either solicited or received.

III. Date of Effectiveness of the Proposed Rule Change and Timing for
Commission Action

    Because the foregoing proposed rule change does not significantly
affect the protection of investors or the public interest; does not
impose any significant burden on competition; and by its terms does not
become operative for 30 days from the date on which it was filed, or
such shorter time as the Commission may designate, it has become
effective pursuant to Section 19(b)(3)(A) \13\ of the Act and Rule 19b-
4(f)(6) thereunder.\14\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \13\ 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(3)(A).
    \14\ 17 CFR 240.19b-4(f)(6). In addition, Rule 19b-4(f)(6)
requires a self-regulatory organization to give the Commission
written notice of its intent to file the proposed rule change at
least five business days prior to the date of filing of the proposed
rule change, or such shorter time as designated by the Commission.
The Exchange has satisfied this requirement.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    At any time within 60 days of the filing of the proposed rule
change, the Commission summarily may temporarily suspend such rule
change if it appears to the Commission that such action is necessary or
appropriate in the public interest, for the protection of investors, or
otherwise in furtherance of the purposes of the Act. If the Commission
takes such action, the Commission shall institute proceedings to
determine whether the proposed rule change should be approved or
disapproved.

IV. Solicitation of Comments

    Interested persons are invited to submit written data, views, and
arguments concerning the foregoing, including whether the proposed rule
change is consistent with the Act. Comments may be submitted by any of
the following methods:

Electronic Comments

     Use the Commission's Internet comment form (http://www.sec.gov/rules/sro.shtml); or
     Send an email to<EMAIL_ADDRESS>Please include
File Number SR-BX-2015-021 on the subject line.

Paper Comments

     Send paper comments in triplicate to Brent J. Fields,
Secretary, Securities and Exchange Commission, 100 F Street NE.,
Washington, DC 20549-1090.

All submissions should refer to File Number SR-BX-2015-021. This file
number should be included on the subject line if email is used. To help
the Commission process and review your comments more efficiently,
please use only one method. The Commission will post all comments on
the Commission's Internet Web site (http://www.sec.gov/rules/sro.shtml). Copies of the submission, all subsequent amendments, all
written statements with respect to the proposed rule change that are
filed with the Commission, and all written communications relating to
the proposed rule change between the Commission and any person, other
than those that may be withheld from the public in accordance with the
provisions of 5 U.S.C. 552, will be available for Web site viewing and
printing in the Commission's Public Reference Room, 100 F Street NE.,
Washington, DC 20549, on official business days between the hours of
10:00 a.m. and 3:00 p.m. Copies of the filing also will be available
for inspection and copying at the principal office of the Exchange. All
comments received will be posted without change; the Commission does
not edit personal identifying information from submissions. You should
submit only information that you wish to make available publicly. All
submissions should refer to File Number SR-BX-2015-021 and should be
submitted on or before May 19, 2015.

    For the Commission, by the Division of Trading and Markets,
pursuant to delegated authority.\15\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \15\ 17 CFR 200.30-3(a)(12).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

Brent J. Fields,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2015-09764 Filed 4-27-15; 8:45 am]
 BILLING CODE 8011-01-P


SUPPORTING STATEMENT FOR

AN INFORMATION COLLECTION REQUEST (ICR)

1.	IDENTIFICATION OF THE INFORMATION COLLECTION

1(a)  Title of the Information Collection

TITLE:  Application for Experimental use Permit (EUP) to Ship and Use a
Pesticide for  Experimental Purposes Only

OMB NO. 2070-0040				     EPA NO. 0276.14

1(b)	Short Characterization/Abstract

This Information Collection Request (ICR) is a proposed renewal of an
existing ICR that is currently approved by OMB and is due to expire
November 30, 2010.  This information collection provides the EPA with
the data necessary to determine whether to issue an experimental use
permit under section 5 of the Federal Insecticide, Fungicide, and
Rodenticide Act (FIFRA), as amended (Attachment A). FIFRA requires that
before a pesticide product may be distributed or sold in the U.S. it
must be registered by EPA.  However, section 5 authorizes EPA to issue
experimental use permits which allow pesticide companies to temporarily
ship pesticide products for experimental use for the purpose of
gathering data necessary to support the application for registration of
a pesticide product.  In general, EUP's are issued either for a
pesticide not registered with the Agency or for a registered pesticide
for a use not registered with the Agency.

The information collected and reported under an EUP is a summary of that
which is routinely submitted in connection with registration.  The EUP
allows for large scale field testing, if necessary, in order to collect
sufficient data to support registration.  An EUP is not required if the
person conducting the tests does not expect to receive benefits in pest
control.

EPA Form 8570-17, Application for An Experimental Use Permit to Ship and
Use a Pesticide for Experimental Purposes Only, is filed by the
prospective registrant for a permit to generate information or data
necessary to register a pesticide under Section 3 of FIFRA, (Attachment
B).  This information from the applicant is necessary in order to grant
and effectively monitor the EUP.  The applicant must also provide the
Agency with a final report on the results of the experimental program
which includes information such as: amount of the product applied; the
crops or sites treated; any observed adverse effects; any adverse
weather conditions which may have inhibited the program; the goals
achieved; and the disposition of containers, unused pesticide material,
and affected food/feed commodities.

If the food/feed treated under the terms of an experimental use
permitted is to be shipped in commerce, the applicant must also submit a
petition for temporary tolerance pursuant to the Federal Food, Drug, and
Cosmetic Act (FFDCA).  This program is more fully described in ICR No.
2070-0024 “Tolerance Petitions for Pesticides and Inert Ingredients on
Food/Feed,” EPA No. 0597 (Attachment C).

2.	NEED FOR AND USE OF THE COLLECTION

2(a).  Need/Authority for the Collection

As required by section 5 of FIFRA, and Part 172 of Title 40 of the Code
of Federal Regulations (40 CFR Part 172), the information collected and
reported is necessary to evaluate the potential hazard of the product
and to make certain that the permit was issued for genuine experimental
purposes rather than as a form of temporary registration (Attachment D).
 To ensure compliance, the final report is compared with the objectives
of the testing program.  The information also enables EPA to identify
whether the treated food or feed crops will be used in a commercial
market.  Such use would require issuance of a temporary tolerance or
destruction of the crop because the use was for research purposes only.
Since it is common for applicants to request extensions of EUP's, it is
imperative that the Agency has reports in hand in order to judge the
need for such extensions.

Exemptions from EUP requirements:

Under the existing EUP regulations, small-scale experimental uses of
pesticides are presumed exempt from the EUP requirements.  EPA will not
require an EUP for a substance or mixture of substances being put
through laboratory or greenhouse tests, or fewer than one surface acre
per pest for terrestrial tests or fewer than ten acres per pest for
aquatic tests, in which the sole purpose under the following small scale
field testing scenarios:

Land-Pesticide testing on plots of land ten acres or less in size:

Test plots may be as large as ten acres per pest if the effect of each
pesticide on several pests is being investigated at a different time for
each pest.  However, if pesticide effects on more than one pest are
being investigated all at the same time, the test plot may not exceed
ten acres in size.  Furthermore, any food or feed crops involved in or
affected by the tests must be destroyed or consumed only by experimental
animals unless a tolerance or exemption from a tolerance has been
established.

Aquatic Uses-Pesticide testing on water bodies one surface acre or less
in size:

 Water bodies may be as large as one acre per pest if the effect of
each pesticide on several pests is being investigated at a different
time for each pest.  However, if pesticide effects on more than one pest
are being investigated all at the same time, the water body may not
exceed one acre in size.  Bodies of water involved in or affected by the
tests may not be used for irrigation, drinking water supplies, or body
contact through recreational activities.  In addition, pesticides may
not be tested in waters that contain or which affect any fish, shellfish
or other plants or animals which may be taken for food or feed unless a
tolerance or exemption from tolerance exists for the test product.

Animal Treatment Uses:

Tests may be conducted only in cases where experimental animals will not
be used for food or feed unless a tolerance or exemption from tolerance
exists for the test product.

Other Uses:

In instances where testing operations do not accurately reflect whether
the testing is to be considered small-or large-scale acreage limits, the
Agency will determine on a case-by-case basis whether an exemption from
the requirement from an EUP is appropriate.

The exemptions described above are not definitive, but 40 CFR 172.3
gives EPA discretionary authority to exempt particular testing
operations from the EUP requirements under other conditions.  40 CFR
172.3 also allows EPA discretionary authority to require EUP’s for
testing operations even when the exemption conditions of 40 CFR 172.3(b)
and (c) are met.

EUP for Small-scale Field Testing of Microbial Pesticides:

The Agency may require an EUP for small scale field testing of certain
unique microbial pesticides (i.e., genetically-altered and
non-indigenous microbial pest control agents) because of the potential
concern for microorganisms to reproduce and multiply in the environment
and the potential for these microbials to cause unforseen adverse
impacts.  Prior to the initiation of any small scale field testing
involving genetically-altered or non-indigenous microbial pest control
agents, the research organization, company, or individual must submit a
notification to the Agency so that a determination can be made as to
whether an EUP is required.  The requirements for a EUP for field
testing of microbial pesticides are found in 40 CFR 172.43-59.  These
requirements differ significantly from the EUP requirements for testing
other pesticides.

2(b).  Practical Utility/Users of the Data

The information collected and reported under an EUP will enable the
Agency to:

Determine whether a renewal, extension or amendment of the EUP, if
requested, is justified;

allow for adequate monitoring of the EUP program; and

ascertain the cause/effect relationship when a pesticide is registered
and later found to have adverse effects (as in the case of
phytotoxicity); and

allow the Agency to review efficacy data which may contain important
health data.

3.	NON DUPLICATION, CONSULTATIONS, AND OTHER COLLECTION CRITERIA

3(a).  Non duplication

The respondent is not required to submit EUP-related information or data
to any other Federal agency or to any other EPA program offices.  FIFRA
section 7, however, does require annual pesticide production reports
from all persons who produce pesticides (Attachment E).  The pesticide
material produced in conjunction with an EUP would be included in these
annual production reports; however, annual production information is not
required as a condition of the EUP, only total production in the final
report.

3(b).  Public Notice Required Prior to ICR Submission to OMB

Pursuant to 5 CFR 1320.8(d) (see Attachment F), EPA is publishing a
Federal Register (FR) notice soliciting comment on this information
collection activity and the Agency’s intent to renew the OMB approval
of this ICR.  The FR notice and the proposed renewal ICR as well as any
public comment are located in the docket for this action, which can be
accessed at   HYPERLINK "http://www.regulations.gov"
http://www.regulations.gov  using the docket identifier
EPA-HQ-OPP-2009-0883.

3(c). Consultations

Consultation and/or dialogue between the respondent and EPA occurs on an
informal, ongoing "as needed" basis, primarily during the submission and
review of the application for an experimental use permit. Historically,
when technical, administrative or other problems arises, the respondent
is given ample opportunity to inform the agency and vice versa. This
communication between both parties may take place either in a telephone
conversation or in a meeting setting, but not necessarily by a
prescribed schedule.

During the development of this renewal ICR, EPA staff will contact
appropriate stakeholders and ask them for their assessment of the
regulatory burden estimates expressed by the Agency in this ICR
(Attachment G).  A summary of these consultations will be provided in
the supporting statement during the second comment period.

3(d).  Effects of Less Frequent Collection

There is only one submission required in conjunction with each request
for EPA approval to conduct testing on certain pesticides.  Therefore,
the frequency of the collection cannot be reduced, except to eliminate
the collection altogether.  The Agency then would have no means by which
to evaluate the potential human health risks and environmental hazard
presented by a proposed test.

3(e).  General Guidelines

The only guideline under the Paperwork Reduction Act (PRA) that is
exceeded in this collection is the time period for retaining records.
EPA requirements in 40 CFR 169.2(k) state that records containing
research data relating to registered pesticides be retained as long as
the registration is valid and the manufacturer remains in business.
Pesticide registrations are valid until they are either voluntarily
canceled or withdrawn by the registrant or until EPA has cause to
suspend or cancel the registration.  Since the average period of
marketability of a pesticide ranges from 15 to 30 years, the PRA
guidelines specifying that data other than health, medical, or tax
records not be required to be retained for more than three years will be
exceeded in this program.

3(f).  Confidentiality

When trade secret information or Confidential Business Information (CBI)
is provided to the Agency, such information is protected from disclosure
under FIFRA Section 10, as amended and EPA's confidentiality regulation,
Title 40 CFR, Part 2, Subpart B (Attachment I).  Data submitted to the
Agency are handled strictly in accordance with the FIFRA CBI Security
Manual.  This manual contains instructions relative to all contact with
confidential documents, including responsibility of EPA employees;
physical security measures; CBI materials within EPA, such as CBI typing
procedures (documents typed internally or on contract); and division
internal procedures.  The manual dictates that: (1) all CBI must be
marked or flagged as such, (2) all CBI must be kept in secure,
double-locked areas, and (3) all CBI for destruction must be cleared by
a document control officer and placed in the Office of Prevention,
Pesticides and Toxic Substances paper shredder.

3(g).  Sensitive Questions

No information of a sensitive or private nature is requested in
conjunction with this information collection activity.  Further, this
information collection activity complies with the provisions of the
Privacy Act of 1974 and OMB Circular A-108.

4.	THE RESPONDENTS AND THE INFORMATION REQUESTED

4(a).  Respondents/NAICS Codes

 The North American Industrial Classification System (NAICS) code for
respondents participating in this data collection is 325300 (Pesticide
Registrants).

4(b).  Information Requested

4(b)(i)	Data Items

Form 8570-17 must be submitted to EPA with each EUP application. The
type of information to be submitted with the application depends on
whether the product is already registered and whether a tolerance is
required for the testing covered under the EUP.  40 CFR 172.4 lists the
information that is required.

An application for an EUP may be submitted by any company or person
wishing to generate the information necessary as required by section 3
of FIFRA in accordance with the regulations found in 40 CFR 172.2(a).
The applicant may be a potential registrant, an independent researcher
or testing laboratory, or any similar agent or consultant of a
manufacturer.  Applications must be submitted to the following address:

Document Processing Desk (EUP)

U.S. Environmental Protection Agency

Office of Pesticide Programs (7504P)

U.S. Environmental Protection Agency

1200 Pennsylvania Ave. NW

Washington, D.C. 20460

Information Required in All EUP Applications

Each EUP application must contain the following information together
with a completed copy of 8570-17:

Applicant’s name and address;

The registration number of the product, if it has been registered
(information requirements for unregistered products are listed below in
a separate section);

Purpose or objectives of the proposed testing;

Detailed description of the proposed testing program including the
following test parameters:

·	Pest organism(s) involved;

·	Amount of pesticide proposed to be used;

·	Crops, fauna, and flora involved;

·	Sites and modes of pesticide applications;

·	Pesticide dosage rates;

·	Location of test site, including States;

·	Number of acres in test site;

·	Number of structural sites or number of animals by State to be
included in the testing;

·	Proposed dates of the testing; and

·	How the testing will be supervised.

Name, street address, telephone number and qualifications of program
participants, including those not employed by the applicant;

Names and street addresses of cooperators (persons owning or controlling
application sites and granting permission to permittees to use these
sites);

Results of prior testing of product by applicant to determine:

·	toxicity and effects in or on target organisms;

toxicity and effects in or on nontarget plants, animals and insects at
or near the application site; and

·	adverse effects to the environment from application of this  product;
and

how the applicant intends to store and dispose of unused pesticide and
containers from the proposed experimental use.

Information Required When the Product to be Tested is Not Already
Registered

In addition to the information listed immediately above, when the
product to be tested has not been registered, the applicant must provide
the following information:

A complete confidential statement of composition giving the composition
of the formulation to be tested as a tabulation of the names and
percentage by weight of each ingredient, both active and inert;

Chemical and physical properties of each active ingredient of the
formulation being tested including the analytical methods to be used to
determine these;

available data on the rate of decline of residues on the treated crop or
site together with other information relevant to determining when
workers can safely re-enter treated areas; and

Available toxicity and exposure data, including human epidemiological
data, relevant to assessing the potential of the product to cause injury
to users and other people who may be exposed.

When Testing May Result in Pesticide Residue on Food

When the product to be tested is to be used in such a manner to leave
residue on food or feed, the applicant has three options for determining
that treated crops are not used for food or feed use without a
tolerance:

The applicant may submit evidence that a tolerance or a tolerance
requirement exemption has been established under Section 408 of the
Federal Food, Drug and Cosmetic Act;

The applicant may submit a petition for a new tolerance or for an
exemption from the requirement for a tolerance established under Section
408 of the Federal Food, Drug and Cosmetic Act (FFDCA) ( Chapter 7 of
this document, Tolerance Petitions, describes this process in detail);
and

The applicant may certify that the food or feed derived from the
experimental program will be destroyed or will be fed only to
experimental animals which will be destroyed. Alternatively, the
applicant may certify that the food or feed derived from the
experimental program will be disposed of in another manner which does
not endanger man or the environment; the permit application shall
specify the means of such disposal.

EUP applications should be submitted to EPA as far in advance as
possible of the first shipping date, at least six months in advance.
FIFRA section 5(a) requires EPA to complete EUP reviews within 120 days,
and failure to provide the appropriate information or data may delay
processing of the EUP beyond this date.

Labeling Requirements

All pesticides shipped or used under an experimental use permit must be
labeled with directions and conditions for use including the following:

The prominent statement “For Experimental Use Only”;

The Experimental Use Permit Number;

The statement “Not for sale to any person other than a participant or
cooperator of the EPA-approved Experimental Use Program”;

The name, brand or trademark;

The name and address of the permittee, producer, or registrant;

The net contents;

An ingredient statement;

Warning or caution statements;

Any limitations on entry of persons into treated areas;

The establishment registration number, except in those cases where
application of the pesticide is made solely by the producer; and

The directions for trial use.

Extensions or renewal of Experimental Use Permits

EUPs and associated temporary tolerances are usually issued for a period
of one or two years. The permit and any associated temporary tolerances,
may be extended, renewed, or amended upon written request to the Agency,
if circumstances warrant.

Fee Requirements

If an application for an EUP is accompanied by a petition for a
tolerance, temporary tolerance, an exemption from the requirement of a
tolerance, or a temporary tolerance exemption, the petition is subject
to fee requirements.  An extension or renewal request for a temporary
tolerance is also subject to a fee requirement.  In March 2004, the
Pesticide Registration Improvement Act (PRIA) of 2003 became effective.
The goal of this Act is to create a more predictable evaluation process
for affected pesticide decisions, and couple the collection of
individual fees with specific decision review periods. The legislation
also promotes shorter decision review periods for applications including
reduced-risk.  Certain submitted EUP actions are included under PRIA and
the burden hours and costs associated with these activities are
estimated in the Pesticide Registration Fee Waivers ICR, (OMB Control
No.: 2070-0167, EPA ICR No.: 2147.03) (Attachment J).

Use of an EUP Product on Food or Feed Crops

A product may only be used on food or feed crops if the Agency has
issued tolerances or exemptions from requirements for tolerances for all
inert ingredients, metabolites, and degradation products, as well as
active ingredients. If the proposed labeling bears instructions for use
of the product on food or feed crops, or if the intended use of the
product results or may be expected to result, directly or indirectly, in
pesticide residues in or on food or feed, applicants must submit a
statement indicating whether a tolerance or an exemption from the
requirement of a tolerance has been issued by the Agency under section
408 of the Federal Food Drug and Cosmetic Act (FFDCA).

If a tolerance, exemption from the requirement of a tolerance has not
been issued for such residues, applicants must include with the
application a petition for establishment of appropriate tolerances,
exemptions from the requirement of a tolerance, or food additive
regulation in accordance with 40 CFR 180. Alternatively, applicants may
certify that the food or feed derived from the experimental program will
be destroyed or fed only to experimental animals for testing purposes,
or otherwise disposed of in a manner which will not endanger man or the
environment.

Suggested Format for an Experimental Use Permit Application

The following format is an example of an acceptable EUP application. Not
all of the items are necessary in every case. Depending on whether the
product being tested is already registered with EPA, and whether a
tolerance is necessary because treated crops will be used as food or
feed, several of these entries may not be necessary.

Section A

	This section should include a data sheet detailing the chemical and
physical properties of the test chemical along with a complete statement
of the names and percentages by weight of each active and inert
ingredient in the formulation to be shipped.

Section B

	This section should include a copy of the proposed experimental label.
The minimum labeling requirements are set forth in 40 CFR 172.6.

Section C

	This section should include toxicity data, including LD ADVANCE \d3 50
ADVANCE \u3  values, eye and skin irritation data for the formulated
product, and subacute, teratology (one species), mutagenicity, and
possibly chronic and reproduction data on the active ingredient. Data on
the product’s toxicity to fish and wildlife may also be included in
Section C as appropriate.

Section D

	This section should include residue data, including when appropriate,
data on: (1) food or feed commodities; (2) non-food crops such as
tobacco; or (3) foliage or other sites where the product may be used and
on which remaining residues of the product may pose a risk to man or the
environment. Section D also includes a description of the analytical
methods used, a summary of the residue data acquired, and when
appropriate, environmental fate data.

Section E

	This section should include product performance information
demonstrating that the product is useful for the purposes proposed.
Because EPA has waived the requirement for submitting efficacy data for
all products except those with public health uses, Section E need not
contain actual efficacy data, but should include a summary of the
results of all efficacy testing performed on the product.

Section F

	This section should include a statement explaining whether a tolerance
exists or is being requested, especially if the product is to be tested
in a manner that may result in residues in food or feed. If a tolerance
is being requested, the temporary tolerance petition must be provided
with the EUP application.  Given the occurrence whenever all food or
feed derived from the experimental program is to be destroyed or fed to
experimental animals, a statement of explanation must be included.

Section G

The section should include details concerning the proposed experimental
program, including:

qualifications, names, addresses and telephone numbers of all EUP
participants, including cooperators, i.e., persons who grant permission
for an experimental use pesticide to be used on application sites which
they own or control;

names of states in which the product will be used, along with the amount
of active ingredient and acreage (or other appropriate measures) to be
used in each state, and the names of states in which the pesticide may
be shipped for further distribution;

details of the proposed EUP program, including types of pests or
organisms targeted; the crops, animals, surface, or sites to be treated;
the geographical areas where the material is to be used; the use
patterns, intended plot sizes, number of plots, number of replicates,
and other test parameters to be used;

information on prior testing, including a description and the specific
results of any appropriate prior testing of the product conducted by the
applicant to determine, toxicity and effects in or on any target
organisms at the site of application; phytotoxicity and other forms of
toxicity or effects on nontarget plants, animals and insects, at or near
the site of application ; or any adverse effects on the environment;

objectives of the EUP program, including a statement specifying the type
of data to be collected and the intended gain from conducting the
program;

justification for the quantity (volume) of active ingredient proposed to
be used under the EUP, including a statement specifying the various
parameters used to determine the quantity of active ingredient;

a statement proposing a suitable duration for the EUP commensurate with
the program objectives; and

details concerning the method of disposing of unused materials at the
conclusion of the testing program.

Program Surveillance and Data Reporting Requirements for an Experimental
Use Permit

Once the permit is issued and the pesticide testing is underway, the
applicant is required to track the results at each test site and submit
a final report to EPA which shall include (40 CFR 172.8):

All data gathered during the testing program. Although field notes need
not be included in this report, they must be kept available for EPA
review upon request.

A report of how pesticide containers and unused pesticides were disposed
of, including the quantity disposed of, disposal sites and disposal
methods.

In the case where meat-producing animals or birds are treated by or
exposed to an experimental use pesticide, the applicant must report the
name and location where the animals will be processed to the U.S.
Department of Agriculture, Animal and Plant Health Inspection Service,
Washington, DC, 20250.

The applicant must also report any adverse effects from use of or from
exposure to the pesticide being tested.

EPA may require advance notice from the applicant of the intended test
dates, sites and times. The applicant must also allow EPA access to the
testing site to determine whether the testing complies with the terms
and conditions of the permit.

	4(b)(ii)	 Respondent Activities

	The following are the activities to be conducted by a respondent
(applicant) in order to comply with the provisions of EPA Form 8570-17.

	Activity

	Explanation

read FIFRA Section 5

and 40 CFR 172.8(b)

become familiar with the legislation and regulations and determine the
requirements as they pertain to a   proposed experimental use of a
pesticide

plan activities

plan the actions necessary to comply with the legislation and
regulations

create information

develop information required for notification

gather information

gather information required for the notification or containment records

process, compile, and  review information

check information for accuracy and completeness

complete paperwork

prepare notification document or containment record

record, disclose, and

display information

submit notification to OPP

store, maintain, and

file information

retain copies of all submissions

5.	THE INFORMATION COLLECTED – AGENCY ACTIVITIES, COLLECTION
METHODOLOGY, AND INFORMATION MANAGEMENT

5(a).  Agency Activities

	The following are activities necessary to evaluate a submitted request
for an experimental use permit:

	Activity

	Explanation

review submitted application package

review application form and package for completeness and appropriateness

record submission

record submission in tracking system

analyze submission

conduct scientific reviews of data

file submission

store and maintain submission information in Agency’s file system

5(b).  Collection Methodology and Management

A submitted EUP package usually includes three parts: an EPA Application
Form 8570-17, the product label, and, in most cases, supporting data.
The application form and the product label are pin-punched by date by
the Front-End Application Processing Unit for initial screening.  If
everything is found to be complete, the proposed EUP is given a file
symbol, entered into the appropriate tracking system, and a registration
jacket is created identifying the document by the appropriate Product
Manager (PM) for the chemical being employed.  The accompanying data is
identified and processed for review.

The three-part EUP package is sent to the designated PM who is
responsible for managing the registration action.  The testing program
and labeling program are reviewed by the PM while the data portion is
routed for scientific review to the appropriate discipline.  On
completion of the scientific review, the PM receives a written analysis
of the data.  If the data is found to be acceptable, an EUP is issued.
If not, the EUP request is rejected and the PM then notifies the
applicant in writing of the deficiencies before the EUP request can be
resubmitted.  The file is then updated in the tracking system to reflect
the latest status and the registration jacket is stored in the file
room.

5(c).  Small Entity Flexibility

The Agency recognizes that many small businesses are involved in
research and development activities with pesticides.  In setting forth
the notification requirements, EPA has sought to minimize the regulatory
burden on research and development.  Toward this end, the Agency has
identified the minimum amount of data to be submitted to permit a
scientific assessment of the proposed research.  Much of this
information already would be available to the respondent as part of the
normal information developed during the research and development stage.
These data requirements are flexible and may be adjusted as appropriate
to the specific product under review.  As an alternative to submitting a
Notification, an applicant may apply for, and obtain an EUP before
conducting a field test with a pesticide.  Because the notification
requirements have been designed from the outset to minimize the burden
on respondents, as a result, there are no special measures taken for
small businesses since the burden is considered to be at a minimal
level.

5(d).  Collection Schedule

Not applicable.  This activity is conducted only when an EUP request is
made.

6.	ESTIMATING THE BURDEN AND COST OF THE COLLECTION

6(a).   Estimating the Respondent Burden

Respondent burden hours are estimated at 10.10 hours per response at a
cost of $615.08. Based on the number of applications received in fiscal
years 2007, 2008 and 2009, the anticipated number of respondents for
each of the next three fiscal years is 21. The total respondent burden
is estimated to be 212.1 hours.

6(b).   Estimating Respondent Costs

To determine respondent costs, the Agency used the Bureau of Labor
Statistics estimates of labor rates for the North American Industry
Classification System (NAICS) code for the Pesticide Registrants (NAICS
325300).  The managerial labor rate is based on the Standard
Occupational Code (SOC) for management occupations, the technical on the
SOC for life, physical and social science occupations, and the clerical
on the SOC for office and administrative support occupations.  The labor
rates are fully loaded and indexed to 2008 dollars.  The fully loaded
hourly mean wage rate estimate for managerial occupations is $109.82 per
hour.  For technical occupations, the fully loaded mean wage rate is
$60.39 per hour, and for occupations the fully loaded mean wage rate is
$35.89 per hour. (See Attachment K.)

Using the Agency’s burden estimate and the fully-loaded labor rates,
the Agency estimates the applicant labor costs to be approximately $615
per response.  The total labor cost associated with the paperwork burden
is estimated to be $12,917.

	ANNUAL RESPONDENT BURDEN/COST ESTIMATES

COLLECTION ACTIVITIES

Burden Hours (per year)

TOTAL

 ADVANCE \d3 	Management

$109.82/hr.

Technical

$60.39/hr.

Clerical

$35.89/hr.

Hours

Costs

Read regulations

0.5

0.5

0.0	 1.0 	$85.10

Plan activities

0.0

1.0

0.0	 1.0 	$60.39

Create information

0.0

2.0

0.0	 2.0 	$120.78

Gather information

0.0

2.5

0.0	 2.5 	$150.97

Compile and review

0.0

2.0

0.0	 2.0 	$120.78

Complete paperwork

0.1

0.5

0.0	 0.6 	$41.18

Store/maintain data

0.0

0.0

1.0	 1.0 	$35.89

TOTAL

0.6

8.5

1.0	 10.1 	$615.08

ANNUAL BURDEN:  10.10 Total Hours x 21 Respondents = 212.1 Hours

ANNUAL COSTS

	(a) Management:  0.6 hours x $109.82 x 21 Respondents 	 	  $1,384

	(b) Technical:   8.50 hours x $60.39 x 21 Respondents 		$10,779

	(c) Clerical:    1.00 hours x $35.89 x 21 respondents			     $754

							 Total			$12,917

6(c)   Estimating Agency Burden and Costs

For this ICR renewal, the Agency is using data on internal OPP Divisions
that provide significant support and analysis for the experimental use
permit ICR program.  This data is taken from the Time and Attendance
Information System (TAIS), which archives the Agency’s Full Time
Equivalents (FTEs) for most OPP program activities.  The Agency believes
that using data from the TAIS reflects the changes to the internal
operations for implementing and administering experimental use permit
activities.  The major impetus for internal program realignment was to
implement the requirements of the Food Quality Protection Act of 1996
and the Pesticide Registration Improvement Act of 2003 (PRIA) as
reauthorized.

Using this new source of data the estimated number of Agency FTE’s
dedicated to experimental use permit activities is 0.18 managerial FTE,
1.77 technical FTEs, and 0.11 clerical FTE.  Greater detail is given in
the below tables.  The aggregated Agency estimated FTEs dedicated to
experimental use permit activities is 2.05 and, based on 2,080 hours per
FTE, the burden hours are 4,271.

Distribution of Agency Managerial FTEs Supporting Experimental Use
Permit Activities

AD	BPPD	EFED	HED	RD

0.01	0.08	0.02	0.06	0.02

Agency total 	0.18

Distribution of Agency Technical FTEs Supporting Experimental Use Permit
Activities

AD	BPPD	EFED	HED	RD

0.05	0.85	0.13	0.52	0.21

Agency total 	1.77

Distribution of Agency Clerical FTEs Supporting FIFRA Experimental Use
Permit Activities

AD	BPPD	EFED	HED	RD

0.01	0.06	0.01	0.02	0.02

Agency total 	0.11

To determine Agency costs, the Agency used the Bureau of Labor
Statistics estimates of labor rates for the North American Industry
Classification System (NAICS) code for the Federal Executive Branch
(NAICS 999100).  The managerial labor rate is based on the Standard
Occupational Code (SOC) for management occupations; the technical labor
rate is based on the SOC for life, physical and social science
occupations; and the clerical labor rate is based on the SOC for office
and administrative support occupations.  The labor rates are fully
loaded and indexed to 2008 dollars.  The fully loaded hourly mean wage
rate estimate for managerial occupations is $107.56 per hour.  For
technical occupations, the fully loaded mean wage rate is $71.58 per
hour, and for occupations the fully loaded mean wage rate is $41.21 per
hour. (See Attachment L.)

To calculate the Agency’s estimated annual cost of experimental use
permit activities, the number of FTEs allocated to experimental use
permit activities is multiplied by the cost per FTE.  This represents
the Agency’s estimate of its cost that will result from experimental
use permit activities for each of the next three years.

ANNUAL BURDEN:  2.05 FTE x 2,080 hours per FTE = 4,271 Hours

ANNUAL COSTS

	(a) Management:  378 hours (0.18 FTE) x $107.56 =	$40,620

	(b) Technical:   3,673 hours (1.77 FTE) x $71.58 =		$262,933

	(c) Clerical:    220 hours (0.11 FTE) x $41.21 =		$9,083

						Total			$312,636

6(d)   Bottom Line Hours and Costs / Master Table

	MASTER TABLE

TOTAL

Hours

Costs

Respondent Burden/Cost Estimates:

212

          $12,917

Agency Burden/Cost Estimates:

4,271

          $312,636

6(e)   Reasons For Changes in Burden

Annual respondent burden is estimated in this renewal to be 212 hours.
This is a reduction from the estimate in the previous ICR of 757.5
hours.  The reduction in the respondent burden is a result of a
reduction in the number of experimental use permits being submitted to
the Agency.  The previous ICR was based on 75 submissions while the
current ICR is based on 21 submissions.  Respondent costs have also
declined from $48,327 to $12,917.

Estimated Agency burden and total costs, however, has been adjusted
upwards from 1,125 hours to 4,271 hours, and from $75,199 to $312,636.
This is a result of an improvement in the data and method used to
calculate Agency burden.

6(f)   Burden Statement

The total annual “respondent” (applicant) burden for the proposed
renewal ICR entitled Application for Experimental Use Permit (EUP) to
Ship and Use a Pesticide for Experimental Purposes Only, is estimated to
be 212 hours with an average potential per respondent burden of 10
hours.  According to the Paperwork Reduction Act, “burden” means the
total time, effort, or financial resources expended by persons to
generate, maintain, retain, or disclose or provide information to or for
a Federal agency.  For this collection, it is the time reading the
regulations, planning the necessary data collection activities,
conducting tests, analyzing data, generating reports and completing
other required paperwork, and storing, filing, and maintaining the data.
 The agency may not conduct or sponsor, and a person is not required to
respond to, a collection of information unless it displays a currently
valid OMB control number.  The OMB control number for this information
collection appears at the beginning and the end of this document.  In
addition OMB control numbers for EPA’s regulations, after initial
display in the final rule, are listed in 40 CFR part 9 and appear on the
information collection instrument as applicable, i.e., form or
instructions.

The Agency has established a public docket for this ICR under Docket ID
No. EPA-HQ-OPP-2006-0632, which is available for online viewing at
HYPERLINK "http://www.regulations.gov"  www.regulations.gov , or in
person viewing at the OPP Regulatory Public Docket in Rm. S-4400, One
Potomac Yard (South Building), 2777 S. Crystal Drive, Arlington, VA.
This docket facility is open from 8:30 a.m. to 4 p.m., Monday through
Friday, excluding legal holidays.  The docket telephone number is (703)
305-5805.  You may submit comments regarding the Agency's need for this
information, the accuracy of the provided burden estimates and any
suggested methods for minimizing respondent burden, including the use of
automated collection techniques.

Comments may be submitted to EPA electronically through
http://www.regulations.gov or by mail addressed to OPP Regulatory Public
Docket (7502P), Office of Pesticide Programs (OPP), Environmental
Protection Agency, 1200 Pennsylvania Ave., NW., Washington, DC
20460–0001.  You can also send comments to the Office of Information
and Regulatory Affairs, Office of Management and Budget, 725 17th
Street, NW, Washington, DC 20503, Attention: Desk Office for EPA.
Include docket ID No. EPA-HQ-OPP-2006-0632 and OMB control number
2070-0040 in any correspondence but do not submit Experimental Use
Permit applications and any related information (e.g., forms, reports,
etc.) to these addresses.  The information described in this ICR is to
be submitted to the address identified in section 4(b) of this
supporting statement.

Attachments to the Supporting Statement

	All of the attachments listed below can be found in the docket for this
ICR (unless otherwise noted); accessible electronically through
HYPERLINK "http://www.regulations.gov/"  www.Regulations.gov  . On the
main page, select Advanced Search from the menu bar at the top and
select Docket Search. Enter the Docket ID Number, EPA-HQ-OPP-2009-0883
in the Docket ID field. Click on the Submit button. From the results
page, you will be able to link to the docket view or directly open
select documents found in the docket.

Attachment A:	Federal Insecticide Fungicide Rodenticide Act (FIFRA)
Section 5

Attachment B:	EPA Form 8570-17 - Application For An Experimental Use
Permit To Ship And Use A Pesticide For Experimental Purposes Only

Attachment C:	Supporting Statement for Information Collection Request
for Tolerance Petitions for Pesticides and Inert Ingredients on
Food/Feed Crops – 2009 (OMB No. 2070-0024; EPA No. 0597)

Attachment D:	Code of Federal Regulations, Title 40 Part 172 -
Experimental Use Permits

Attachment E:	Federal Insecticide Fungicide Rodenticide Act (FIFRA)
Section 7

Attachment F:	Code of Federal Regulations, Title 5 Part 1320 - Agency
collection of information responsibilities.

Attachment G:	Sample Consultation Questionnaire

Attachment H:	Reserved

Attachment I:	Code of Federal Regulations, Title 40 Part 2, Subpart B -
Confidentiality of Business Information)

Attachment J:	Supporting Statement for Pesticide Registration Fee
Waivers – 2006 (OMB No. 2070-0167, EPA ICR No. 2147)

Attachment K	Work Sheet used to Calculate Registrant Labor Costs

Attachment L:	Work Sheet used to Calculate EPA Labor Costs

					January 29, 2010

 PAGE

Page   PAGE  1  of   NUMPAGES  18

Page   PAGE  4  of   NUMPAGES  18