[Federal Register: January 19, 2006 (Volume 71, Number 12)]
[Notices]
[Page 3075-3077]
[DOCID:fr19ja06-69]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission

Combined Notice of Filings 1

January 10, 2006.
    Take notice that the Commission received the following electric
rate filings.
    Docket Numbers: ER01-1807-015, 016, 017, 018; ER01-2020-012, 013,
014, 015.
    Applicants: Carolina Power & Light Company. Florida Power
Corporation.
    Description: Carolina Power & Light Co. dba Progress Energy
Carolina, Inc. submits an amended refund report reflecting the correct
amounts for energy imbalance interest refunds pursuant to FERC's
December 9, 2005 Order.
    Filed Date: December 30, 2005.
    Accession Number: 20060106-0148.
    Comment Date: 5 p.m. Eastern Time on Friday, January 20, 2006.

    Docket Numbers: ER02-2330-040.
    Applicants: ISO New England Inc.
    Description: ISO New England submits Independent Assessment of
Demand Response Programs and impact evaluation and market assessment.
    Filed Date: December 30, 2005.
    Accession Number: 20060104-0261.
    Comment Date: 5 p.m. Eastern Time on Friday, January 20, 2006.

    Docket Numbers: ER05-487-002.
    Applicants: FPL Energy Cowboy Wind, LLC.
    Description: PL Energy Cowboy Wind, LLC submits notice of change in
status including but not limited to ownership or control of generation
facilities.
    Filed Date: November 18, 2005.
    Accession Number: 20051118-5138.
    Comment Date: 5 p.m. Eastern Time on Thursday, January 19, 2006.

    Docket Numbers: ER05-1221-003.
    Applicants: Commonwealth Edison Company.
    Description: Commonwealth Edison Co. submits a status report and
request that it serve as an amendment to its pending Transmission
Interconnection Agreement.
    Filed Date: December 30, 2005.
    Accession Number: 20060105-0147.
    Comment Date: 5 p.m. Eastern Time on Friday, January 20, 2006.

    Docket Numbers: ER06-190-001.

    Applicants: Electric Energy, Inc.
    Description: Electric Energy Inc. submits an amended and restated
copy of the Power Contract which incorporates all changes to the Power
Contract after September, 1987 which remained in effect as of January
1, 2003.
    Filed Date: December 30, 2005.
    Accession Number: 20060104-0262.
    Comment Date: 5 p.m. Eastern Time on Friday, January 20, 2006.

    Docket Numbers: ER06-263-001.
    Applicants: Cleco Power LLC.
    Description: Cleco Power LLC submits an errata to its November 30,
2005 letter.
    Filed Date: December 30, 2005.
    Accession Number: 20060104-0258.
    Comment Date: 5 p.m. Eastern Time on Friday, January 20, 2006.

    Docket Numbers: ER06-429-000.
    Applicants: Florida Power Corporation.
    Description: Florida Power Co. dba Progress Energy Florida, Inc
submits revisions to their Open Access Transmission Tariffs, FERC
Electric Tariff, Second Revised Volume No. 6, consistent with FERC's
December 12, 2005 Order.
    Filed Date: December 30, 2005.
    Accession Number: 20060103-0008.
    Comment Date: 5 p.m. Eastern Time on Friday, January 20, 2006.

    Docket Numbers: ER06-430-000.
    Applicants: Progress Energy Services Company, LLC.
    Description: Progress Energy Service Co., LLC on behalf of Carolina
Power & Light Co. submits Second Revised Sheet 433 et al to FERC
Electric Tariff, Third Revised Volume No. 3 in compliance with Order
661-A, issued December 12, 2005.
    Filed Date: December 30, 2005.
    Accession Number: 20060103-0007.
    Comment Date: 5 p.m. Eastern Time on Friday, January 20, 2006.

    Docket Numbers: ER06-431-000.
    Applicants: Progress Energy Services Company, LLC.
    Description: Progress Energy Service on behalf of Florida Power
Corp. amends Exhibit A of the revised Contract for interchange service
with Reedy Creek Improvement District, First Revised Schedule No. 119.
    Filed Date: December 30, 2005.
    Accession Number: 20060103-0006.
    Comment Date: 5 p.m. Eastern Time on Friday, January 20, 2006.

    Docket Numbers: ER06-432-000.
    Applicants: Southwest Power Pool, Inc.
    Description: Southwest Power Pool submits revisions to its Open
Access Transmission Tariff consistent with Order 663.
    Filed Date: December 30, 2005.
    Accession Number: 20060103-0016.
    Comment Date: 5 p.m. Eastern Time on Friday, January 20, 2006.

    Docket Numbers: ER06-433-000.
    Applicants: Midwest Independent Transmission System Operator, Inc.
    Description: Midwest Independent Transmission System Operator, Inc.
submits an unexecuted Large Generator Interconnection Agreement among
Twin Creeks Wind, LLC and Midwest ISO.
    Filed Date: December 30, 2005.
    Accession Number: 20060103-0015.
    Comment Date: 5 p.m. Eastern Time on Friday, January 20, 2006.

    Docket Numbers: ER06-434-000.
    Applicants: California Independent System Operator Corporation.
    Description: California Independent System Operator Corp. submits
an amendment to the Responsible Participating Transmission Owner
Agreement with Pacific Gas & Electric Co.
    Filed Date: December 30, 2005.
    Accession Number: 20060103-0005.
    Comment Date: 5 p.m. Eastern Time on Friday, January 20, 2006.

    Docket Numbers: ER06-435-000.
    Applicants: Midwest Independent Transmission System Operator, Inc.
    Description: Midwest Independent Transmission System Operator, Inc.
submits a Large Generator Interconnection Agreement with Great River
Energy, Generation and Midwest ISO.
    Filed Date: December 30, 2005.
    Accession Number: 20060103-0014.
    Comment Date: 5 p.m. Eastern Time on Friday, January 20, 2006.

    Docket Numbers: ER06-436-000.
    Applicants: Avista Corporation.
    Description: Avista Corp. submits an unsigned pro-forma Network
Integration Transmission Service Agreement with the Bonneville Power
Administration.
    Filed Date: December 30, 2005.
    Accession Number: 20060103-0010.
    Comment Date: 5 p.m. Eastern Time on Friday, January 20, 2006.

    Docket Numbers: ER06-437-000-001.
    Applicants: Entergy Services, Inc.
    Description: Entergy Services, Inc. on behalf of Entergy Arkansas,
Inc. submits a Service Agreement providing for cost-based, short term,
power sales to the City of Prescott, Arkansas and on January 4, 2006
submitted copies of signature page of executed service agreement.
    Filed Date: December 30, 2005.
    Accession Number: 20060103-0011.
    Comment Date: 5 p.m. Eastern Time on Friday, January 20, 2006.

    Docket Numbers: ER06-438-000.
    Applicants: New England Power Pool.
    Description: The New England Power Pool Participants Committee
submits signature pages to the Agreement dated September 1, 1971 with
CalBear Energy, LP, et al.
    Filed Date: December 30, 2005.
    Accession Number: 20060103-0012.
    Comment Date: 5 p.m. Eastern Time on Friday, January 20, 2006.

    Docket Numbers: ER06-439-000.
    Applicants: Otter Tail Power Company.
    Description: Otter Tail Power Co. submits Amendment to the
Interconnection & Transmission Service Agreement with Minnkota Power
Cooperative Inc.
    Filed Date: December 30, 2005.
    Accession Number: 20060105-0130.
    Comment Date: 5 p.m. Eastern Time on Friday, January 20, 2006.

    Docket Numbers: ER06-440-000.
    Applicants: Electric Energy, Inc.
    Description: Electric Energy, Inc.'s Modification No. 17 to a Power
Contract dated September 2, 1987 with the Department of Energy
designated as Contract DE-AC05-760R1312.
    Filed Date: December 30, 2005.
    Accession Number: 20060105-0105.
    Comment Date: 5 p.m. Eastern Time on Friday, January 20, 2006.

    Docket Numbers: ER06-441-000.
    Applicants: Decatur Energy Center, LLC.
    Description: Decatur Energy Center, LLC submits a proposed rate
schedule under which it will have authority to make wholesale sales of
electric energy, capacity, replacement reserves and certain ancillary
services etc.
    Filed Date: December 30, 2005.
    Accession Number: 20060105-0064.
    Comment Date: 5 p.m. Eastern Time on Friday, January 20, 2006.

    Docket Numbers: ER06-442-000.
    Applicants: Midwest Electric Power, Inc.
    Description: Midwest Electric Power, Inc. submits a Power Supply
Agreement dated December 21, 2005 with Electric Energy, Inc., effective
January 1, 2006.
    Filed Date: December 30, 2005.
    Accession Number: 20060105-0063.
    Comment Date: 5 p.m. Eastern Time on Friday, January 20, 2006.

    Docket Numbers: ER06-443-000.
    Applicants: Select Energy, Inc.
    Description: Select Energy Inc., Northeast Utilities Service Co. et
al submit a Notice of Amendments to Power Sales Agreements and
Termination of Rate Schedules with Groveland Electric Light Department
et al.
    Filed Date: December 30, 2005.
    Accession Number: 20060105-0062.
    Comment Date: 5 p.m. Eastern Time on Friday, January 20, 2006.

    Docket Numbers: ER06-444-000.
    Applicants: Western Kentucky Energy Corp.; and LG&E Energy
Marketing Inc.
    Description: Application of Western Kentucky Energy Corp. & LG&E
Energy Marketing, Inc. for approval of reassignment of Network
Transmission Rights & Confirmation of Waviers & Blanket Authorizations.
    Filed Date: December 30, 2005.
    Accession Number: 20060105-0065.
    Comment Date: 5 p.m. Eastern Time on Friday, January 20, 2006.

    Docket Numbers: ER06-445-000.
    Applicants: PJM Interconnection L.L.C.
    Description: PJM Interconnection, LLC submits an executed
Interconnection Service Agreement w/ Prime Energy Limited Partnership
and PSE&G Services Corp.
    Filed Date: December 30, 2005.
    Accession Number: 20060105-0131.
    Comment Date: 5 p.m. Eastern Time on Friday, January 20, 2006.

    Any person desiring to intervene or to protest in any of the above
proceedings must file in accordance with Rules 211 and 214 of the
Commission's Rules of Practice and Procedure (18 CFR 385.211 and
385.214) on or before 5 p.m. Eastern time on the specified comment
date. It is not necessary to separately intervene again in a subdocket
related to a compliance filing if you have previously intervened in the
same docket. Protests will be considered by the Commission in
determining the appropriate action to be taken, but will not serve to
make protestants parties to the proceeding. Anyone filing a motion to
intervene or protest must serve a copy of that document on the
Applicant. In reference to filings initiating a new proceeding,
interventions or protests submitted on or before the comment deadline
need not be served on persons other and the Applicant.
    The Commission encourages electronic submission of protests and
interventions in lieu of paper, using the FERC Online links at http://www.ferc.gov.
 To facilitate electronic service, persons with Internet

access who will eFile a document and/or be listed as a contact for an
intervenor must create and validate an eRegistration account using the
eRegistration link. Select the eFiling link to log on and submit the
intervention or protests.
    Persons unable to file electronically should submit an original and
14 copies of the intervention or protest to the Federal Energy
Regulatory Commission, 888 First St., NE., Washington, DC 20426.
    The filings in the above proceedings are accessible in the
Commission's eLibrary system by clicking on the appropriate link in the
above list. They are also available for review in the Commission's
Public Reference Room in Washington, DC. There is an eSubscription link
on the Web site that enables subscribers to receive e-mail notification
when a document is added to a subscribed dockets(s). For assistance
with any FERC Online service, please e-mail<EMAIL_ADDRESS>or call<PHONE_NUMBER> (toll free). For TTY, call<PHONE_NUMBER>.

Magalie R. Salas,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. E6-483 Filed 1-18-06; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 6717-01-P


[Federal Register: November 30, 2009 (Volume 74, Number 228)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Page 62489-62490]
[DOCID:fr30no09-7]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION

Federal Aviation Administration

14 CFR Part 39

[Docket No. FAA-2009-0870 Directorate Identifier 2009-CE-049-AD;
Amendment 39-16108; AD 2009-24-14]
RIN 2120-AA64

Airworthiness Directives; Empresa Brasileira de
Aeron[aacute]utica S.A. (EMBRAER) Model EMB-500 Airplanes

AGENCY: Federal Aviation Administration (FAA), Department of
Transportation (DOT).

ACTION: Final rule.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: We are adopting a new airworthiness directive (AD) for the
products listed above. This AD results from mandatory continuing
airworthiness information (MCAI) issued by an aviation authority of
another country to identify and correct an unsafe condition on an
aviation product. The MCAI describes the unsafe condition as:

    It has been found the possibility of elevator mass balance
fasteners becoming slack under certain conditions. The loose of at
least two fasteners may lead to an unbalance condition, which may
induce flutter on airplane elevators.

We are issuing this AD to require actions to correct the unsafe
condition on these products.

DATES: This AD becomes effective January 4, 2010.
    On January 4, 2010, the Director of the Federal Register approved
the incorporation by reference of certain publications listed in this
AD.

ADDRESSES: You may examine the AD docket on the Internet at http://
www.regulations.gov or in person at Document Management Facility, U.S.
Department of Transportation, Docket Operations, M-30, West Building
Ground Floor, Room W12-140, 1200 New Jersey Avenue, SE., Washington, DC
20590.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Karl Schletzbaum, Aerospace Engineer,
FAA, Small Airplane Directorate, 901 Locust, Room 301, Kansas City,
Missouri 64106; telephone:<PHONE_NUMBER>; fax:<PHONE_NUMBER>.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

Discussion

    We issued a notice of proposed rulemaking (NPRM) to amend 14 CFR
part 39 to include an AD that would apply to the specified products.
That NPRM was published in the Federal Register on September 21, 2009
(74 FR 48028). That NPRM proposed to correct an unsafe condition for
the specified products. The MCAI states:

    It has been found the possibility of elevator mass balance
fasteners becoming slack under certain conditions. The loose of at
least two fasteners may lead to an unbalance condition, which may
induce flutter on airplane elevators.

The MCAI requires replacement of the nuts of the right and left
elevators mass balance fasteners.

Comments

    We gave the public the opportunity to participate in developing
this AD. We received no comments on the NPRM or on the determination of
the cost to the public.

Conclusion

    We reviewed the available data and determined that air safety and
the public interest require adopting the AD as proposed.

Differences Between This AD and the MCAI or Service Information

    We have reviewed the MCAI and related service information and, in
general, agree with their substance. But we might have found it
necessary to use different words from those in the MCAI to ensure the
AD is clear for U.S. operators and is enforceable. In making these
changes, we do not intend to differ substantively from the information
provided in the MCAI and related service information.
    We might also have required different actions in this AD from those
in the MCAI in order to follow FAA policies. Any such differences are
highlighted in a note within the AD.

Costs of Compliance

    We estimate that this AD will affect 25 products of U.S. registry.
We also estimate that it will take about 2 work-hours per product to
comply with the basic requirements of this AD. The average labor rate
is $80 per work-hour. Required parts will cost about $150 per product.
    Based on these figures, we estimate the cost of this AD to the U.S.
operators to be $7,750 or $310 per product.

Authority for This Rulemaking

    Title 49 of the United States Code specifies the FAA's authority to
issue rules on aviation safety. Subtitle I, section 106, describes the
authority of the FAA Administrator. ``Subtitle VII: Aviation
Programs,'' describes in more detail the scope of the Agency's
authority.
    We are issuing this rulemaking under the authority described in
``Subtitle VII, Part A, Subpart III, Section 44701: General
requirements.'' Under that section, Congress charges the FAA with
promoting safe flight of civil aircraft in air commerce by prescribing
regulations for practices, methods, and procedures the Administrator
finds necessary for safety in air commerce. This regulation is within
the scope of that authority because it addresses an unsafe condition
that is likely to exist or develop on products identified in this
rulemaking action.

Regulatory Findings

    We determined that this AD will not have federalism implications
under Executive Order 13132. This AD will not have a substantial direct
effect on the States, on the relationship between the national
government and the States, or on the distribution of power and
responsibilities among the various levels of government.
    For the reasons discussed above, I certify this AD:
    (1) Is not a ``significant regulatory action'' under Executive
Order 12866;
    (2) Is not a ``significant rule'' under DOT Regulatory Policies and
Procedures (44 FR 11034, February 26, 1979); and
    (3) Will not have a significant economic impact, positive or
negative, on a substantial number of small entities under the criteria
of the Regulatory Flexibility Act.
    We prepared a regulatory evaluation of the estimated costs to
comply with this AD and placed it in the AD Docket.

Examining the AD Docket

    You may examine the AD docket on the Internet at http://
www.regulations.gov; or in person at the Docket Management Facility
between 9 a.m. and 5 p.m., Monday through Friday, except Federal
holidays. The AD docket contains the NPRM, the regulatory evaluation,
any comments received, and other information. The street address for
the Docket Office (telephone<PHONE_NUMBER>) is in the ADDRESSES
section. Comments will be available in the AD docket shortly after
receipt.

List of Subjects in 14 CFR Part 39

    Air transportation, Aircraft, Aviation safety, Incorporation by
reference, Safety.

Adoption of the Amendment

0
Accordingly, under the authority delegated to me by the Administrator,
the FAA amends 14 CFR part 39 as follows:

PART 39--AIRWORTHINESS DIRECTIVES

0
1. The authority citation for part 39 continues to read as follows:

    Authority: 49 U.S.C. 106(g), 40113, 44701.

Sec.  39.13  [Amended]

0
2. The FAA amends Sec.  39.13 by adding the following new AD:

2009-24-14 Empresa Brasileira de Aeron[aacute]utica S.A. (EMBRAER):
Amendment 39-16108; Docket No. FAA-2009-0870; Directorate Identifier
2009-CE-049-AD.

Effective Date

    (a) This airworthiness directive (AD) becomes effective January
4, 2010.

Affected ADs

    (b) None.

Applicability

    (c) This AD applies to EMB-500 airplanes, serial numbers
50000005, 50000006, 50000008 through 50000036, 50000038 through
50000041, 50000043 through 50000046, 50000048, and 50000053,
certificated in any category.

Subject

    (d) Air Transport Association of America (ATA) Code 27: Flight
Controls.

Reason

    (e) The mandatory continuing airworthiness information (MCAI)
states:
    It has been found the possibility of elevator mass balance
fasteners becoming slack under certain conditions. The loose of at
least two fasteners may lead to an unbalance condition, which may
induce flutter on airplane elevators.
The MCAI requires replacement of the nuts of the right and left
elevators mass balance fasteners.

Actions and Compliance

    (f) Unless already done, do the following actions:
    (1) Within the next 30 days after January 4, 2010 (the effective
date of this AD), replace the nuts of the right-hand (RH) and left-
hand (LH) elevators' mass balance fasteners with new ones of self-
locking type bearing part number (P/N) MS21043-4. Do the
replacements following Phenom by Embraer Service Bulletin No. 500-
55-0001, dated July 24, 2009.
    (2) As of 30 days after January 4, 2010 (the effective date of
this AD), only install self-locking type nuts, P/N MS21043-4, on the
RH and LH elevators' mass balance fasteners.

FAA AD Differences

    Note: This AD differs from the MCAI and/or service information
as follows: No differences.

Other FAA AD Provisions

    (g) The following provisions also apply to this AD:
    (1) Alternative Methods of Compliance (AMOCs): The Manager,
Standards Office, FAA, has the authority to approve AMOCs for this
AD, if requested using the procedures found in 14 CFR 39.19. Send
information to Attn: Karl Schletzbaum, Aerospace Engineer, FAA,
Small Airplane Directorate, 901 Locust, Room 301, Kansas City,
Missouri 64106; telephone:<PHONE_NUMBER>; fax:<PHONE_NUMBER>.
Before using any approved AMOC on any airplane to which the AMOC
applies, notify your appropriate principal inspector (PI) in the FAA
Flight Standards District Office (FSDO), or lacking a PI, your local
FSDO.
    (2) Airworthy Product: For any requirement in this AD to obtain
corrective actions from a manufacturer or other source, use these
actions if they are FAA-approved. Corrective actions are considered
FAA-approved if they are approved by the State of Design Authority
(or their delegated agent). You are required to assure the product
is airworthy before it is returned to service.
    (3) Reporting Requirements: For any reporting requirement in
this AD, under the provisions of the Paperwork Reduction Act (44
U.S.C. 3501 et seq.), the Office of Management and Budget (OMB) has
approved the information collection requirements and has assigned
OMB Control Number 2120-0056.

Related Information

    (h) Refer to MCAI Ag[ecirc]ncia Nacional de
Avia[ccedil][atilde]o Civil (ANAC) Brazilian Airworthiness Directive
AD No.: 2009-09-01, dated September 3, 2009, and Phenom by Embraer
Service Bulletin No. 500-55-0001, dated July 24, 2009, for related
information.

Material Incorporated by Reference

    (i) You must use Phenom by Embraer Service Bulletin No. 500-55-
0001, dated July 24, 2009, to do the actions required by this AD,
unless the AD specifies otherwise.
    (1) The Director of the Federal Register approved the
incorporation by reference of this service information under 5
U.S.C. 552(a) and 1 CFR part 51.
    (2) For service information identified in this AD, contact
EMBRAER Empresa Brasileira de Aeron[aacute]utica S.A., Phenom
Maintenance Support, Av. Brig. Farina Lima, 2170, Sao Jose dos
Campos--SP, CEP: 12227-901--PO Box: 38/2, BRASIL, telephone: ++55 12
3927-5383; fax: ++55 12 3927-2610; E-mail:
<EMAIL_ADDRESS>Internet: http://
www.embraer.com.br.
    (3) You may review copies of the service information
incorporated by reference for this AD at the FAA, Central Region,
Office of the Regional Counsel, 901 Locust, Kansas City, Missouri
64106. For information on the availability of this material at the
Central Region, call<PHONE_NUMBER>.
    (4) You may also review copies of the service information
incorporated by reference for this AD at the National Archives and
Records Administration (NARA). For information on the availability
of this material at NARA, call<PHONE_NUMBER>, or go to: http://
www.archives.gov/federal_register/code_of_federal_regulations/
ibr_locations.html.

    Issued in Kansas City, Missouri, on November 19, 2009.
Patrick R. Mullen,
Acting Manager, Small Airplane Directorate, Aircraft Certification
Service.
[FR Doc. E9-28306 Filed 11-27-09; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4910-13-P


[Federal Register Volume 79, Number 218 (Wednesday, November 12, 2014)]
[Notices]
[Pages 67222-67223]
[FR Doc No: 2014-26686]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

[Release No. 34-73516; File Nos. SR-BSECC-2014-001; SR-BX-2014-045; SR-
NASDAQ-2014-093; SR-Phlx-2014-61; SR-SCCP-2014-01]

Self-Regulatory Organizations; Boston Stock Exchange Clearing
Corporation; NASDAQ OMX BX, Inc.; the NASDAQ Stock Market LLC; NASDAQ
OMX PHLX LLC; Stock Clearing Corporation of Philadelphia; Order
Approving Proposed Rule Changes To Amend the Restated Certificate of
Incorporation and By-Laws of the NASDAQ OMX Group, Inc.

November 5, 2014.

I. Introduction

    On September 10, 2014, Boston Stock Exchange Clearing Corporation
(``BSECC''), NASDAQ OMX BX, Inc. (``BX''), the NASDAQ Stock Market LLC
(``NASDAQ''), NASDAQ OMX PHLX LLC (``Phlx''), and the Stock Clearing
Corporation of Philadelphia (``SCCP'' and, together with BSECC, BX,
NASDAQ and Phlx, the ``SROs'' or ``Self-Regulatory Subsidiaries''),
filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (``Commission''),
pursuant to Section 19(b)(1) \1\ of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934
(``Act''),\2\ and Rule 19b-4 thereunder,\3\ proposed rule changes with
respect to amendments to the Amended and Restated Certificate of
Incorporation (``Charter'') and By-Laws (``By-Laws'') of the NASDAQ OMX
Group, Inc. (``NASDAQ OMX''), the parent company of the SROs.\4\ The
proposed rule changes by BSECC and SCCP were published for comment in
the Federal Register on September 25, 2014 \5\ and the proposed rule
changes by BX, NASDAQ and Phlx were published for comment in the
Federal Register on September 29, 2014.\6\ The Commission received no
comment letters on the proposals.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \1\ 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(1).
    \2\ 15 U.S.C. 78a.
    \3\ 17 CFR 240.19b-4.
    \4\ Certain provisions of NASDAQ OMX's Charter and By-Laws are
rules of a self-regulatory organization if they are stated policies,
practices, or interpretations, as defined in Rule 19b-4 under the
Act, of the self-regulatory organization, and must be filed with the
Commission pursuant to Section 19(b) of the Act and Rule 19b-4
thereunder. See Securities Exchange Act Release Nos. 58183 (July 17,
2008), 73 FR 42850 (July 23, 2008) (File No. SR-NASDAQ-2008-035);
58324 (August 7, 2008), 73 FR 46936 (August 12, 2008) (File Nos. SR-
BSE-2008-02; SR-BSE-2008-23; SR-BSE-2008-25; SR-BSECC-2008-01); and
58180 (July 17, 2008), 73 FR 42890 (July 23, 2008) (File No. SR-
SCCP-2008-01) (Order Approving a Proposed Rule Change, as Modified
by Amendment No. 1, To Amend the By-Laws of the NASDAQ OMX Group,
Inc. in Connection With the Acquisitions of Boston Stock Exchange,
Incorporated and Philadelphia Stock Exchange, Inc.). Accordingly,
the SROs have filed with the Commission proposed changes to the
NASDAQ OMX Charter and By-Laws.
    \5\ See Securities Exchange Act Release Nos. 73144 (September
19, 2014), 79 FR 57624 (September 25, 2014) (SR-BSECC-2014-001) and
73145 (September 19, 2014), 79 FR 57648 (September 25, 2014) (SR-
SCCP-2014-01).
    \6\ See Securities Exchange Act Release Nos. 73195 (September
23, 2014), 79 FR 58397 (September 29, 2014) (SR-BX-2014-045); 73193
(September 23, 2014), 79 FR 58388 (September 29, 2014) (SR-NASDAQ-
2014-093); and 73194 (September 23, 2014), 79 FR 58393 (September
29, 2014) (SR-Phlx-2014-61).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

II. Discussion

A. Background

    Article Fourth, Paragraph C of NASDAQ OMX's Charter includes a
voting limitation that generally prohibits a stockholder from voting
shares beneficially owned, directly or indirectly, by such stockholder
in excess of 5% of the then-outstanding shares of capital stock of
NASDAQ OMX entitled to vote as of the record date in respect of any
matter. Pursuant to Article Fourth, Paragraph C(6) of the Charter,
NASDAQ OMX's Board may grant exemptions to this limitation prior to the
time a stockholder beneficially owns more than 5% of the outstanding
shares of stock entitled to vote on the election of a majority of
directors at such time. Article Fourth, Paragraph C(6) of the Charter
and Section 12.5 of the By-Laws limit the Board's authority to grant
the exemption. The SROs note that these provisions, which are intended
to be substantively identical, currently contain some language
differences. Therefore, the SROs propose that NASDAQ OMX adopt the
amendments described below to the Charter and By-Laws to conform these
provisions and remove any ambiguity that may exist.

B. Proposed Amendments to the Charter

    First, the SROs propose to add a statement to Article Fourth,
Paragraph C(6) of the Charter that for so long as NASDAQ OMX shall
control, directly or indirectly, any Self-Regulatory Subsidiary, a
resolution of the Board to approve an exemption for any person under
Article Fourth, Paragraph C(6) of the Charter shall not be permitted to
become effective until such resolution has been filed with and approved
by the SEC under Section 19 of the Act. In addition, the SROs propose
to define ``Self-Regulatory Subsidiary,'' which is currently not a
defined term in the Charter, as any subsidiary of NASDAQ OMX that is a
``self-regulatory organization'' as defined under Section 3(a)(26) of
the Act.\7\ These changes would conform the Charter to language
currently in the By-Laws.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \7\ Under Section 3(a)(26) of the Act, a ``self-regulatory
organization'' is defined as ``any national securities exchange,
registered securities association, or registered clearing agency . .
. .'' 15 U.S.C. 78c(a)(26). At present, this defined term would
include NASDAQ, BX and Phlx, which are national securities
exchanges, and BSECC and SCCP, which are registered clearing
agencies that are currently dormant.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    Second, the SROs propose to add an additional language to the
current provision in Article Fourth, Paragraph C(6) of the Charter that
states the Board may not approve an exemption to the 5% voting
limitation for: (i) A registered broker or dealer or an affiliate
thereof or (ii) an individual or entity that is subject to a statutory
disqualification under Section 3(a)(39) of the Act. Specifically, the
SROs propose to add a proviso to Article Fourth, Paragraph C(6) of the
Charter stating that for these purposes, an ``affiliate'' shall not be
deemed to include an entity that either owns 10% or less of the equity
of a broker or dealer, or receives 1% or less of its consolidated gross
revenues from a broker or dealer. This change would conform the Charter
to language currently in the By-Laws.
    Third, the SROs propose to change a reference in Article Fourth,
Paragraph C(6) of the Charter from The NASDAQ Stock Market LLC to ``the
Self-Regulatory Subsidiaries.'' This change would conform the Charter
to language currently in the By-laws and would also include the other
Self-Regulatory Subsidiaries in addition to the NASDAQ Stock Market
LLC.
    Fourth, the SROs propose to add a requirement to Article Fourth,

Paragraph C(6) of the Charter to state that, prior to granting an
exemption from the 5% voting limitation, the Board must also determine
that granting the exemption would promote the prompt and accurate
clearance and settlement of securities transactions (and to the extent
applicable, derivative agreements, contracts and transactions), assure
the safeguarding of securities and funds in the custody or control of
the self-regulatory subsidiaries that are clearing agencies or
securities and funds for which they are responsible, foster cooperation
and coordination with persons engaged in the clearance and settlement
of securities transactions, and remove impediments to and perfect the
mechanism of a national system for the prompt and accurate clearance
and settlement of securities transactions. This change would confirm
the Charter to language currently in the By-Laws.
    Finally, the SROs propose that Article Fourth, Paragraph C(6) of
the Charter be amended to correct a cross-reference to subparagraph
6(b), which no longer exists.

C. Proposed Amendments to the By-Laws

    The SROs propose to amend the definition of ``Self-Regulatory
Subsidiary'' in Article I(s) of the By-Laws to refer to any subsidiary
of NASDAQ OMX that is a self-regulatory organization as defined under
Section 3(a)(26) of the Act, rather than list specific subsidiaries
that would fall within this category. The proposed definition is the
same definition proposed for purposes of the Charter and would capture
NASDAQ OMX's current self-regulatory subsidiaries as well as any
subsidiaries that in the future would meet the definition of ``self-
regulatory organization'' under the Act.
    The SROs also propose to correct a typographical error in Article I
and make minor edits to Section 12.5 of the Bylaws to conform the
language regarding the 5% voting limitation to the language in the
analogous provision of the Charter.\8\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \8\ See Securities Exchange Act Release No. 71353 (January 17,
2014), 79 FR 4209 (January 24, 2014) (SR-BSECC-2013-001, SR-BX-2013-
057, SR-NASDAQ-2013-148, SR-Phlx-2013-115, SR-SCCP-2013-01), at note
14.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

III. Commission Findings

    After careful review, the Commission finds that the proposed rule
changes are consistent with the requirements of the Act and the rules
and regulations thereunder applicable to a national securities
exchange, in the case of the proposals by BX, NASDAQ and Phlx, and to a
clearing agency, in the case of the proposals by BSECC and SCCP.\9\ In
particular, the Commission finds that the proposed rule changes by BX,
NASDAQ and Phlx are consistent with Section 6(b)(1) of the Act,\10\
which, among other things, requires a national securities exchange to
be so organized and have the capacity to be able to carry out the
purposes of the Act and to comply, and enforce compliance by its
members and persons associated with its members, with the provisions of
the Act, the rules and regulations thereunder and the rules of the
exchange. In addition, the Commission finds that the proposed rule
changes by BX, NASDAQ and Phlx are consistent with Section 6(b)(5) of
the Act,\11\ which, among other things, requires that the rules of the
exchange be designed to prevent fraudulent and manipulative acts and
practices, to promote just and equitable principles of trade, to foster
cooperation and coordination with persons engaged in regulating,
clearing, settling, processing information with respect to, and
facilitating transactions in securities, to remove impediments to and
perfect the mechanism of a free and open market and a national market
system, and, in general, to protect investors and the public interest.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \9\ In approving the proposed rule changes, the Commission notes
that it has considered the proposed rule changes' impact on
efficiency, competition, and capital formation. See 15 U.S.C.
78c(f).
    \10\ 15 U.S.C. 78f(b)(1).
    \11\ 15 U.S.C. 78f(b)(5).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    The Commission also finds that the proposed rule changes by BSECC
and SCCP are consistent with Section 17A(b)(3)(C) of the Act,\12\
because the proposals assure a fair representation of shareholders and
participants in the selection of directors and administration of their
affairs. While the proposals relate to the organizational documents of
NASDAQ OMX, rather than BSECC and SCCP, BSECC and SCCP are indirectly
owned by NASDAQ OMX, and therefore, NASDAQ OMX's stockholders have an
indirect stake in BSECC and SCCP. In addition, the participants in
BSECC and SCCP, to the extent any exist, could purchase stock in NASDAQ
OMX in the open market, just like any other stockholder. The proposals
ensure that NASDAQ OMX stockholders have clarity about the existing
voting limitation in NASDAQ OMX's Charter and By-Laws. As a result, the
proposals assure a fair representation of NASDAQ OMX's stockholders in
the selection of directors and administration of NASDAQ OMX's affairs,
as well as the affairs of BSECC and SCCP.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \12\ 15 U.S.C. 78q-1(b)(3)(C).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    The SROs have proposed certain changes to conform the provisions in
the Charter and the By-Laws relating to the procedures by which NASDAQ
OMX's Board may grant an exemption to the prohibition on any NASDAQ OMX
stockholder voting shares in excess of 5% of the Company's then-
outstanding shares of capital stock. The Commission believes that these
proposed changes will eliminate confusion that may exist because of the
current language differences between the two documents. In addition,
the proposed definition of ``Self-Regulatory Subsidiary'' will ensure
that any NASDAQ OMX subsidiary that meets the definition of ``self-
regulatory organization'' under the Act will be subject to the Charter
and By-Law provisions relating to Self-Regulatory Subsidiaries.
Further, the remaining proposed non-substantive clarifying changes are
clarifying in nature, and thus should help make the Charter and By-Laws
clearer and easier to understand.

IV. Conclusion

    For the foregoing reasons, the Commission finds that the proposed
rule changes are consistent with the Act and the rules and regulations
thereunder applicable to a national securities exchange, in the case of
BX, NASDAQ and Phlx, and to a registered clearing agency, in the case
of BSECC and SCCP.
    It is therefore ordered, pursuant to Section 19(b)(2) of the
Act\13\ that the proposed rule changes (SR-BSECC-2014-001; SR-BX-2014-
045; SR-NASDAQ-2014-093; SR-Phlx-2014-61; SR-SCCP-2014-01) are
approved.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \13\ 15 U.S.C. 78f(b)(2).
    \14\ 17 CFR 200.30-3(a)(12).

    For the Commission, by the Division of Trading and Markets,
pursuant to delegated authority.\14\
Kevin M. O'Neill,
Deputy Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2014-26686 Filed 11-10-14; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 8011-01-P


[Federal Register Volume 79, Number 8 (Monday, January 13, 2014)]
[Notices]
[Pages 2177-2178]
[FR Doc No: 2014-00320]

=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES

Food and Drug Administration

[Docket No. FDA-2013-N-0001]

Request for Notification From Industry Organizations Interested
in Participating in the Selection Process for Nonvoting Industry
Representatives and Request for Nominations for Nonvoting Industry
Representatives on the Pharmacy Compounding Advisory Committee

AGENCY: Food and Drug Administration, HHS.

ACTION: Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Food and Drug Administration (FDA) is requesting that
industry organizations interested in participating in the selection of
nonvoting industry representatives to represent the interests of the
pharmacy compounding industry and the pharmaceutical manufacturing
industry on the Pharmacy Compounding Advisory Committee for the Center
for Drug Evaluation and Research notify FDA in writing. A nominee may
either be self-nominated or nominated by an organization to serve as a
nonvoting industry representative. Nominations will be accepted for two
vacancies effective with this notice.
    FDA seeks to include the views of women and men, members of all
racial and ethnic groups, and individuals with and without disabilities
on its advisory committees, and therefore, encourages nominations of
appropriately qualified candidates from these groups. Specifically, in
this document, nominations for nonvoting representatives of industry
interests are encouraged from the pharmacy compounding industry and the
pharmaceutical manufacturing industry.

DATES: Any industry organization interested in participating in the
selection of appropriate nonvoting members to represent the interests
of the pharmacy compounding industry and the pharmaceutical
manufacturing industry should send a letter stating the interest to FDA
by February 12, 2014, for the vacancies listed in this notice.
Concurrently, nomination materials for prospective candidates should be
sent to FDA by February 12, 2014.

ADDRESSES: All letters of interest and nominations should be submitted
electronically to<EMAIL_ADDRESS>or in writing by mail to Jayne E.
Peterson, Center for Drug Evaluation and Research, Food and Drug
Administration, 10903 New Hampshire Ave., Bldg. 31, Rm. 2417, Silver
Spring, MD 20993.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Jayne E. Peterson, Center for Drug
Evaluation and Research, Food and Drug Administration, 10903 New
Hampshire Ave., Bldg. 31, Rm. 2417, Silver Spring, MD 20993, 301-796-
9001, FAX:<PHONE_NUMBER>, email<EMAIL_ADDRESS>
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The Agency requests nominations for
nonvoting industry representatives on the Pharmacy Compounding Advisory
Committee (the Committee) to represent the interests of the pharmacy
compounding industry and the pharmaceutical manufacturing industry.

I. Pharmacy Compounding Advisory Committee

    The Committee advises the Commissioner of Food and Drugs (the
Commissioner) or designee in discharging responsibilities as they
relate to the regulation of compounded drug products. The Committee
provides advice on scientific, technical, and medical issues concerning
drug compounding under sections 503A and 503B of the Federal Food,
Drug, and Cosmetic Act (21 U.S.C. 353a and 353b), and as required, any
other product for which FDA has regulatory responsibility. The
Committee also makes appropriate recommendations to the Commissioner.
    The Committee will include one or more nonvoting members who
represent industry interests. These members will include one
representative of the pharmacy compounding industry and

one representative of the pharmaceutical manufacturing industry. With
this notice, nominations are being sought for one representative from
the pharmacy compounding industry and one representative from the
pharmaceutical manufacturing industry.

II. Criteria for Nonvoting Members

    Any pharmacy compounding organization and any pharmaceutical
manufacturing organization interested in participating in the selection
of an appropriate nonvoting member to represent industry interests
should send a letter stating that interest to the FDA contact (see FOR
FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT) within 30 days of publication of this
document (see DATES).
    Within the subsequent 30 days, FDA will send a letter to each
pharmacy compounding organization that has expressed an interest and
attach a complete list of all such organizations. A list of all
nominees from the pharmacy compounding industry along with their
current r[eacute]sum[eacute]s will also be attached. The letter will
also state that it is the responsibility of the interested
organizations to confer with one another and select a candidate to
serve as the nonvoting member to represent the pharmacy compounding
industry on the committee within 60 days of receiving the FDA letter.
FDA will send similar letters to the pharmaceutical manufacturing
organizations that have expressed interest, and they will be expected
to follow a similar process to select their nominee.
    Interested organizations are not bound by the list of nominees when
selecting a candidate. However, if no individual is selected within 60
days, the Commissioner will select the nonvoting member in each
category to represent industry interests.

III. Nomination Procedure

    Individuals may self-nominate, and/or an organization may nominate
one or more individuals to serve as a nonvoting industry
representative. Nominations should include contact information and a
current, complete r[eacute]sum[eacute] or curriculum vitae for each
nominee. Nominations should also include the name of the Committee and
should be sent to the FDA contact person (see FOR FURTHER INFORMATION
CONTACT) within 30 days of publication of this document (see DATES).
FDA will forward all nominations to the organizations expressing
interest in participating in the selection process for the Committee.
(Persons who nominate themselves as nonvoting industry representatives
will not participate in the selection process).
    Elsewhere in this issue of the Federal Register, FDA is publishing
a notice requesting nominations for voting members of the Committee, a
notice for consumer organizations to participate in the nominations for
and selection of the consumer representative for the Committee, and a
final rule updating information regarding the Committee.
    This notice is issued under the Federal Advisory Committee Act (5
U.S.C. app. 2) and 21 CFR part 14, relating to advisory committees.

    Dated: January 7, 2014.
Jill Hartzler Warner,
Acting Associate Commissioner for Special Medical Programs.
[FR Doc. 2014-00320 Filed 1-10-14; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4160-01-P


[Federal Register Volume 78, Number 122 (Tuesday, June 25, 2013)]
[Notices]
[Pages 38027-38028]
[FR Doc No: 2013-15073]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission

[Project No. 12642-005]

Wilkesboro Hydroelectric Company, LLC; Wilkesboro Hydropower,
LLC; Notice of Application for Transfer of License, and Soliciting
Comments and Motions To Intervene

    On April 15, 2013, Wilkesboro Hydroelectric Company, LLC
(transferor) and Wilkesboro Hydropower, LLC (transferee) filed an
application for the transfer of license for the W. Kerr Scott
Hydropower Project, FERC No. 12642, located on the Yadkin River in
Wilkes County, North Carolina.
    Applicants seek Commission approval to transfer the license for the
W. Kerr Scott Hydropower Project from the transferor to the transferee.
    Applicants' Contact: For Transferor and Transferee: Mr. Kevin
Edwards, Wilkesboro Hydropower, LLC, 1000 CN Smith Mill Road,
Stoneville, NC 27048, telephone<PHONE_NUMBER> and Mr. Donald H.
Clarke, Esq., Duncan, Weinberg, Genzer, and Pembroke, P.C., 1615 M
Street NW., Suite 800, Washington, DC 20036, telephone<PHONE_NUMBER>.
    FERC Contact: Patricia W. Gillis<PHONE_NUMBER>,
<EMAIL_ADDRESS>    Deadline for filing comments and motions to intervene: 30 days from
the issuance date of this notice by the Commission. Comments and
motions to intervene may be filed electronically via the Internet. See
18 CFR 385.2001(a)(1) and the instructions on the Commission's Web site
under http://www.ferc.gov/docs-filing/efiling.asp. Commenters can
submit brief comments up to 6,000 characters, without prior
registration, using the eComment system at http://www.ferc.gov/docs-filing/ecomment.asp. You must include your name and contact information
at the end of your comments. If unable to be filed electronically,
documents may be paper-filed. To paper-file, an original plus five

copies should be mailed to: Kimberly D. Bose, Secretary, Federal Energy
Regulatory Commission, 888 First Street NE., Washington, DC 20426. More
information about this project can be viewed or printed on the eLibrary
link of Commission's Web site at http://www.ferc.gov/docs-filing/elibrary.asp. Enter the docket number (P-12642) in the docket number
field to access the document. For assistance, call toll-free 1-866-208-
3372.

Kimberly D. Bose,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2013-15073 Filed 6-24-13; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6717-01-P


[Federal Register: February 7, 2008 (Volume 73, Number 26)]
[Notices]
[Page 7339-7340]
[DOCID:fr07fe08-103]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

[Release No. 34-57257; File No. SR-FINRA-2007-020]

Self-Regulatory Organizations; Financial Industry Regulatory
Authority, Inc.; Order Approving Proposed Rule Change To Create
Exception to Principal Approval Requirements for Certain Filed Sales
Material

February 1, 2008.

I. Introduction

    On November 1, 2007, the Financial Industry Regulatory Authority,
Inc. (``FINRA'') (f/k/a National Association of Securities Dealers,
Inc. (``NASD'')) filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission
(``Commission'') pursuant to section 19(b)(1) of the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934 (``Act'') \1\ and Rule 19b-4 thereunder,\2\ a
proposed rule change relating to amendments to NASD Rule 2210. The
proposed rule change was published for comment in the Federal Register
on December 28, 2007.\3\ The Commission received three comment letters
in response to the proposed rule change.\4\ This order approves the
proposed rule change.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \1\ 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(1).
    \2\ 17 CFR 240.19b-4.
    \3\ See Securities Exchange Act Release No. 57010 (December 20,
2007); 72 FR 73928 (Dec. 28, 2007).
    \4\ See letter from Neal E. Nakagiri, President, CEO & CCO, NPB
Financial Group, LLC, dated January 16, 2008 (``NPB letter'');
letter from Dale E. Brown, President & CEO, Financial Services
Institute, dated January 18, 2008 (``FSI letter''); and letter from
Dorothy Donohue, Senior Associate Counsel, Investment Company
Institute, dated January 18, 2008 (``ICI letter'').
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

II. Description of the Proposed Rule Change

    The proposed rule change amends NASD Rule 2210 (Communications with
the Public) to create an exception from the principal approval
requirements for certain filed sales material.
    NASD Rule 2210 (Communications with the Public) requires that a
registered principal of a FINRA member firm approve in writing all
advertisements, sales literature, and independently prepared reprints
(collectively, ``sales material'') prior to use. Certain types of sales
materials, such as advertisements and sales literature concerning
mutual funds or variable insurance products must be filed with the
FINRA Advertising Regulation Department (``Department'').
    For funds and variable products that are sold through intermediary
firms, a registered principal at the fund's or variable product's
underwriter typically approves sales material internally and files the
material with the Department. FINRA rules require registered principals
at each of the intermediary firms that use the underwriter's sales
material to re-approve in writing each of these items used by their
firms. (The intermediary firm is not required to re-file the sales
material with the Department so long as it is used without material
change.) If firms have selling agreements with multiple fund families
and insurance companies, the number of items that require re-approval
can easily be in the hundreds, and often thousands, per firm annually.
    Based on recommendations made by its Small Firms Rules Impact Task
Force,\5\ and to eliminate what FINRA regards as a compliance
redundancy, FINRA proposed to create an exception to Rule 2210's
registered principal approval requirements for intermediary firms that
use the sales material of another firm. The exception would apply only
to sales material that another firm has filed with the Department, and
for which the Department has issued a

review letter finding that the material appears to be consistent with
applicable standards.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \5\ NASD established the Small Firms Rules Impact Task Force in
September 2006 to examine how existing NASD rules impact smaller
firms. In particular, the Task Force focuses on possible
opportunities to amend or modernize certain conduct rules that may
be particularly burdensome for small firms, where such changes are
consistent with investor protection and market integrity.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    The intermediary firm that relies on this exception could not
materially alter the sales material or use it in a manner that is
inconsistent with any conditions stated in the Department's review
letter. For example, if the Department's review letter was based in
part upon the representation by the filing firm that the sales material
would be accompanied by a fund prospectus, the intermediary firm would
be subject to a similar constraint.
    Although FINRA anticipates that firms will utilize the exception
primarily with respect to mutual fund and variable insurance product
sales material, the exception is not limited to sales material for
particular products. Thus, the exception also would apply to sales
material for other products, such as real estate investment trusts or
direct participation programs, provided the sales material meets the
exception's requirements.
    FINRA believes this exception would save intermediary firms'
compliance personnel numerous hours that are currently spent reviewing
sales material that has already been approved by a registered principal
at the product underwriter, and that the Department staff also has
reviewed and found to be consistent with applicable standards. Of
course, some firms may want to continue to review this sales material,
and the proposal would allow them to do so.\6\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \6\ The proposed rule change would not affect the contractual
obligations that exist between underwriters and intermediary firms.
Some dealer agreements may, for example, restrict the ability of
underwriters and product wholesalers to send their sales material
directly to a retail firm's sales force. These restrictions can
facilitate the intermediary firm's ability to supervise its sales
force. The proposed rule change would not alter the underwriter's
obligations to comply with these contractual restrictions.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    The proposed rule change would also revise certain of the
advertising record-keeping requirements. Today, Rule 2210(b)(2)(A)
states that firms must maintain a copy of all sales material for a
period of three years from the date of last use. Existing practice has
been to assume that the recordkeeping requirement begins on the date of
first use. The proposal would codify this position. For sales material
subject to the principal approval exception, firms would have to keep a
record of the name of the firm that filed the sales material and a copy
of the related FINRA review letter.

III. Comment Letters

    The Commission received three comment letters in response to the
proposed rule change.\7\ All of the commenters supported the proposed
rule change. Two commenters stated that the proposed rule change would
eliminate hours of unnecessary work.\8\ One commenter expressed support
for the proposal, stating it would be a less burdensome alternative for
intermediary firms.\9\ Moreover, two commenters indicated that the
proposed rule change should not compromise investor protection.\10\
Similarly, one commenter opined that the existing requirement serves no
useful or beneficial purpose, in terms of additional investor
protection concerns.\11\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \7\ Supra note 4.
    \8\ FSI letter; NPB letter.
    \9\ ICI letter.
    \10\ FSI letter; ICI letter.
    \11\ NPB letter.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

IV. Discussion and Findings

    After careful review, the Commission finds that the proposed rule
change is consistent with the requirements of the Act, and the rules
and regulations thereunder that are applicable to a national securities
association. \12\ In particular, the Commission believes that the
proposed rule change is consistent with the provisions of section
15A(b)(6) of the Act,\13\ which requires, among other things, that
FINRA rules must be designed to prevent fraudulent and manipulative
acts and practices, to promote just and equitable principles of trade,
and, in general, to protect investors and the public interest. The
Commission believes that eliminating the requirement for firms to re-
approve sales material in limited circumstances when a registered
principal of a firm has previously approved the sales material and the
Department has previously supplied a favorable review letter will
eliminate a compliance redundancy while maintaining investor
protections. Notably, the initial firm creating all sales material
subject to this exception will continue to be required to obtain sales
material approval from its registered principal, file the sales
material for review with the Department, and obtain a favorable review
letter from the Department.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \12\ In approving this proposal, the Commission has considered
the proposed rule's impact on efficiency, competition and capital
formation. See 15 U.S.C. 78c(f).
    \13\ 15 U.S.C. 78o-3(b)(6).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

V. Conclusions

    It is therefore ordered, pursuant to section 19(b)(2) of the
Act,\14\ that the proposed rule change (SR-FINRA-2007-020) be, and
hereby is, approved.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \14\ 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(2).

    For the Commission, by the Division of Trading and Markets,
pursuant to delegated authority.\15\
Florence E. Harmon,
Deputy Secretary.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \15\ 17 CFR 200.30-3(a)(12).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

 [FR Doc. E8-2161 Filed 2-6-08; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 8011-01-P


[Federal Register Volume 81, Number 41 (Wednesday, March 2, 2016)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Pages 10761-10762]
[FR Doc No: 2016-04508]

=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION

Federal Aviation Administration

14 CFR Part 25

[Docket No.: FAA-2014-0001; Amdt. No. 25-142]
RIN 2120-AK29

Harmonization of Airworthiness Standards--Fire Extinguishers and
Class B and F Cargo Compartments; Correction

AGENCY: Federal Aviation Administration (FAA), DOT.

ACTION: Final rule; correction.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The FAA is correcting a final rule published on February 16,
2016. In that rule, the FAA amended certain airworthiness regulations
for transport category airplanes by upgrading fire safety standards for
Class B cargo compartments; establishing fire safety standards for a
new type of cargo compartment, Class F; and updating related standards
for fire extinguishers. This amendment eliminated certain regulatory
differences between the airworthiness standards of the FAA and the
European Aviation Safety Agency (EASA), without affecting current
industry design practices. However, in that document, the amendment
number for the final rule was incorrect, and this document now posts
the correct amendment number.

DATES: This correction is effective on March 2, 2016.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: For technical questions concerning
this action, contact Stephen M. Happenny, Propulsion/Mechanical Systems
Branch, ANM-112, Transport Airplane Directorate, Aircraft Certification
Service, Federal Aviation Administration, 1601 Lind Ave. SW., Renton,
WA 98055-4056; telephone<PHONE_NUMBER>; facsimile<PHONE_NUMBER>;
email<EMAIL_ADDRESS>
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

Background

    On February 16, 2016 (81 FR 7698), the FAA published a final rule
entitled, ``Harmonization of Airworthiness Standards--Fire
Extinguishers and Class B and F Cargo Compartments'' (81 FR 7698).
    This rule amended certain airworthiness regulations for transport
category airplanes by upgrading fire safety standards for Class B cargo
compartments; establishing fire safety standards for a new type of
cargo compartment, Class F; and updating

related standards for fire extinguishers. The rule was based on
recommendations from the Aviation Rulemaking Advisory Committee (ARAC)
and the National Transportation Safety Board (NTSB), and the changes
addressed designs for which airworthiness directives (ADs) have been
issued by both the FAA and the French civil aviation authority,
Direction G[eacute]n[eacute]rale de l'Aviation Civile (DGAC). It
eliminated certain regulatory differences between the airworthiness
standards of the FAA and EASA, without affecting current industry
design practices. These changes ensured an acceptable level of safety
for these types of cargo compartments by standardizing certain
requirements and procedures.
    However, the rule was published with an incorrect amendment number,
``25-141,'' which is the same amendment number as the rule entitled
``Harmonization of Airworthiness Standards--Gust and Maneuver Load
Requirements'' (79 FR 73462), published on December 11, 2014. The
correct amendment number for this rule should be ``25-142.''

Correction

    In FR Doc. 2016-03000, beginning on page 7698 in the Federal
Register of February 16, 2016, make the following correction:

Correction

    1. On page 7698, in the third column, correct the 4th header
paragraph from ``[Docket No.: FAA-2014-0001; Amdt. No. 25-141]'' to
read as ``[Docket No.: FAA-2014-0001; Amdt. No. 25-142]''.

    Issued under authority provided by 49 U.S.C. 106(f) in
Washington, DC, on February 24, 2016.
Lirio Liu,
Director, Office of Rulemaking.
[FR Doc. 2016-04508 Filed 3-1-16; 8:45 am]
 BILLING CODE 4910-13-P


Comment Info: =================

General Comment:I am writing as an individual consumer to request an extension of the comment period for the Food and Drug Administration's ("FDA") Proposed Rule Deeming Tobacco Products to be Subject to the Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act, as amended by the Family Smoking and Prevention and Tobacco Control Act (the "Proposed Rule") published at 79 Fed. Reg. 23,142 and Federal Register No. 2014-09491. On behalf of myself, I am requesting that the comment period for the Proposed Rule be extended by the FDA for an additional 105 days, from its current 75-day period, to 180 days.

The Proposed Rule raises a number of significant issues and questions that are important and relevant to me, as a consumer of products that are proposed for regulation under the Proposed Rule. The Proposed Rule asks about a hundred different questions I might want to respond to. I want to provide my thoughts and comments on many of these issues, but my time to devote to researching and providing thoughtful comments on these important questions is limited. I have already spent many hours researching and dissecting these issues, but they take time. I know that the FDA took many years to even come up with the Proposed Rule, so I do not think it is at all unreasonable to allow the public a mere six months to comment on it. This is our only opportunity, as consumers, to provide our feedback.

I feel very strongly about e-cigarettes as an alternative to combustible cigarettes. Quite simply, I firmly believe that they saved my life. I wish to provide you with my personal story, as well as science- and evidence-based responses to your questions so that you can take my comment into account. I realize that the FDA has the authority under 21 CFR 10.40 to extend this time frame and that the FDA has exercised this authority on numerous occasions in the past. I would therefore ask that you do so here, so that all stakeholders have the opportunity to provide their comments on this proposed regulation.  I believe that this is a direct assault on consumers and it should me researched further. It appears to me that this type of regulation is targeting one aspect of the American society, instead of focusing on ALL aspects of consumers, ie., the sin tax, etc.

I appreciate your consideration of my request and am happy to discuss this issue with you further.


OW 2002 0012 II. National Primary Drinking Water Regulations; Announcement of Completion of EPA's Review of Existing Drinking Water Standards; Notice ( Six Year Review)

Federal Register Vol. 68, No. 138 July 18, 2003 A. Federal Register Notice B. Reference Material Cited in the Preamble C. OMB Review OW 2002 0012 Six Year Review II  A A. Federal Register Notices.

1. National Primary Drinking Water Regulations; Announcement of Completion of EPA's Review of Existing Drinking Water Standards; Notice. Vol. 68, No. 138. July 18, 2003. Pp. 42907 42929.

2. U. S. Environmental Protection Agency. National Primary Drinking Water Regulations. Announcement of the Results of EPA's Review of Existing Drinking Water Standards and Request for Public Comment. Proposed Rule. April 17, 2002. Federal Register, Vol. 67, No. 74; pp. 19029 19090. OW 2002 0012 Six Year Review II B B. Reference Material Cited in the Preamble 1. National Drinking Water Advisory Council ( NDWAC). 2000. Recommended Guidance for Review of Existing National Primary Drinking Water Regulations. November 2000. 62 pp. SEE W 01 14 Six Year Review I B. 21 SEE ALSO: EDOCKET # OW 2002 0012 0021 Also available on the Internet at: http:// www. epa. gov/ safewater/ ndwac/ guidfnl. pdf.

2. National Research Council ( NRC). 1993. Health Effects of Ingested Fluoride. National Academy Press, Washington, DC. August 1993. 181 pp. Also available on the Internet at: http:// books. nap. edu/ books/ 030904975X/ html/ R1. html.

3. National Toxicology Program ( NTP). 2002. NTP study of the hexavalent chromium compound sodium dichromate dihydrate. SEE W 01 14 Six Year Review I B. 22 SEE ALSO: EDOCKET # OW 2002 0012 0022 Also available on the Internet at: http:// ntp server. niehs. nih. gov/ htdocs/ Studies/ HexChromium/ hexchromiumpg. html.

4. Schroeder, H. A., Mitchener, M. and Nason, A. P. 1970. Zirconium, niobium, antimony, vanadium and lead in rats: life term studies. Journal of Nutrition. 100: 59 68. SEE Phase V MCLG & MCL Finals III D2a. 7 5. Senate Report. 1995. COMMITTEE OF ENVIRONMENT AND PUBLIC WORKS, SAFE DRINKING WATER ACT AMENDMENTS OF 1995, S. DOC. NO. 169, 104th Cong., 1st Sess. 38 ( 1995). 12 Selected Pages.

6. USEPA. 1986. EPA Guidelines for Carcinogen Risk Assessment. Federal Register. Vol. 51, No. 185. p. 33992, September 24, 1986. SEE W 01 14 Six Year Review I B. 29 SEE ALSO EDOCKET # OW 2002 0012 0029 7. USEPA. 1987. National Primary Drinking Water Regulations B Synthetic Organic Chemicals; Monitoring for Unregulated Contaminants; Final Rule. Federal Register. Vol. 52, No. 130. p. 25690, July 8, 1987. SEE W 01 14 Six Year Review I B. 30 SEE ALSO EDOCKET # OW 2002 0012 0030.

8. USEPA. 1988. Integrated Risk Information System, gamma Hexachlorocyclohexane. Also Available on the Internet at: http:// www. epa. gov/ iris/ subst/ 0065. htm. 7 pp.

9. USEPA. 1989. Lead in School's Drinking Water. EPA 570/ 9 89 001. January 1989. OW 2002 0012 Six Year Review II B 10. USEPA. 1991a. National Primary Drinking Water Regulations B Synthetic Organic Chemicals and Inorganic Chemicals; Monitoring for Unregulated Contaminants; National Primary Drinking Water Regulations Implementation; National Secondary Drinking Water Regulations; Final Rule. Federal Register. Vol. 56, No. 20. p. 3526, January 30, 1991. SEE W 01 14 Six Year Review I B. 30 SEE ALSO EDOCKET # OW2002 0012 0035 11. USEPA. 1991b. Maximum Contaminant Level Goals and National Primary Drinking Water Regulations for Lead and Copper; Final Rule. Federal Register. Vol. 56, No. 110. p. 26460, June 7, 1991. SEE W 01 14 Six Year Review I B. 36 SEE ALSO EDOCKET # OW 2002 0012 0036 12. USEPA. 1992. Final Regulatory Impact Analysis National Primary Drinking Water Regulations: Phase V Synthetic Organic and Inorganic Chemicals. February 1992. SEE Phase V MCLG & MCL Final III F1.1 13. USEPA. 1993. Reregistration Eligibility Decision ( RED)  Glyphosate. EPA Report 738 R 93 014. Washington, DC: Office of Prevention, Pesticides, and Toxic Substances. September 1993. 7 pp. Also available on the Internet at: http:// www. epa. gov/ oppsrrd1/ REDs/ old_ reds/ glyphosate. pdf.

14. USEPA. 1994. Lead in Drinking Water in Schools and Non Residential Buildings. EPA 812 B 94 002. Office of Water. April 1994. Available on the Internet at: http:// www. epa. gov/ safewater/ consumer/ leadinschools. html 15. USEPA. 1997a. National Primary Drinking Water Regulations B Advance Notice of Proposed Rulemaking. Federal Register. Vol. 62, No. 156. p. 36100, July 3, 1997. SEE W 97 03 CMR IA. 1 16. USEPA. 1997b. Alternative Monitoring Guidelines. EPA 816 R 97 011. August 1997. SEE W 01 14 Six Year Review I B. 43 SEE ALSO EDOCKET # OW 2002 0012 0042 Also available on the Internet at: http:// www. epa. gov/ safewater/ regs/ pmrfin. html.

17. USEPA. 1998. IRIS, Beryllium and Compounds. 30 pp. Also available on the Internet at: http:// www. epa. gov/ iris/ subst/ 0012. htm. OW 2002 0012 Six Year Review II B 18. USEPA. 1999a. Guidelines for Carcinogen Risk Assessment. NCEA F 0644 Review Draft. U. S. Environmental Protection Agency Risk Assessment Forum. Washington, D. C. July 1999. 7 pp. SEE W 01 14 Six Year Review I B. 51 SEE ALSO EDOCKET # OW 2002 0012 0052 19. USEPA. 1999b. Revisions to the Unregulated Contaminant Monitoring Regulations for Public Water Systems; Final Rule. Federal Register. Vol. 64, No. 180. p. 50556, September 17, 1999. SEE W 98 02 UCMR Final II A. 1 20. USEPA. 1999c. A Review of Contaminant Occurrence in Public Water Systems. EPA 816 R 99 006. 93 pp. November 1999. SEE W 01 14 Six Year Review I B. 54 SEE ALSO EDOCKET # OW 2002 0012 0054 Also available on the Internet at: http:// www. epa. gov/ safewater/ occur/ nov99_ lo. pdf 21. USEPA. 2000. National Primary Drinking Water Regulations for Lead and Copper; Final Rule. Federal Register. Vol. 65, No. 8. p. 1950, January 12, 2000. SEE W 01 14 Six Year Review I B. 36 SEE ALSO EDOCKET # OW 2002 0012 0063 22. USEPA. 2001. National Primary Drinking Water Regulation: Arsenic and Clarifications to Compliance and New Source Contaminants Monitoring; Final Rule. Federal Register. Vol. 66. No. 14. p. 6975, January 22, 2001. SEE W 01 14 Six Year Review I B. 69 SEE ALSO EDOCKET # OW 2002 0012 0070 23. USEPA. 2002a. Integrated Risk Information System ( IRIS); Announcement of 2002 Program; Request for Information; Notice. Federal Register. Vol. 67, No. 6. p. 1212, January 9, 2002. 4 pp. SEE W 01 14 Six Year Review I B. 72 SEE ALSO EDOCKET # OW 2002 0012 0072 24. USEPA. 2002b. Water Treatment Technology Feasibility Support Document for Chemical Contaminants; In support of EPA Six Year Review of National Primary Drinking Water Regulations. EPA 815 D 02 001. Draft. February 2002. SEE W 01 14 Six Year Review I B. 82 SEE ALSO EDOCKET # 0W 2002 0012 0078 OW 2002 0012 Six Year Review II B 25. USEPA. 2002c. An Evaluation of Available Economic Information in Support of the Six Year Review of Existing National Primary Drinking Water Regulations. Memo from Marc Parrotta, Targeting and Analysis Branch, Office of Ground Water and Drinking Water. March 2002. SEE W 01 14 Six Year Review I B. 74 SEE ALSO EDOCKET # OW 2002 0012 0090 26. USEPA. 2002d. EPA Protocol for Review of Existing National Primary Drinking Water Regulations. EPA 815 D 02 004. Draft. March 2002. SEE W 01 14 Six Year Review I B. 77 SEE ALSO EDOCKET # OW 2002 0012 0075 27. USEPA. 2002e. Occurrence Estimation Methodology and Occurrence Findings Report for the Six Year Regulatory Review of Existing National Primary Drinking Water Regulations. EPA 815 D 02 005. Draft. March 2002. SEE W 01 14 Six Year Review I B. 78 SEE ALSO EDOCKET # OW 2002 0012 0081 28. USEPA. 2002f. Occurrence Summary and Use Support Document for the Six Year Regulatory Review of Existing National Primary Drinking Water Regulations. EPA 815 D 02 006. Draft. March 2002. SEE W 01 14 Six Year Review I B. 79 SEE ALSO EDOCKET # OW 2002 0012 0077 29. USEPA. 2002g. National Primary Drinking Water Regulations B Announcement of the Results of EPA's Review of Existing Drinking Water Standards and Request for Public Comment; Proposed Rule. Federal Register. Vol. 67, No. 74. p. 19030, April 17, 2002. SEE W 01 14 Six Year Review I A SEE ALSO EDOCKET # OW 2002 0012 0001 30. USEPA. 2002h. Reregistration Eligibility Decision ( RED)  Lindane. EPA 738 R 02 012. Office of Prevention, Pesticides, and Toxic Substances. July 2002. 5 pp. Also available on the Internet at: http:// www. epa. gov/ oppsrrd1/ REDs/ lindane_ red. pdf.

31. USEPA. 2002i. Integrated Risk Information System ( IRIS), 1,1 Dichloroethylene. August 2002. 25 pp. Also available on the Internet at: http:// www. epa. gov/ iris/ subst/ 0039. htm. OW 2002 0012 Six Year Review II B 32 USEPA. 2003a. Analytical Feasibility Support Document for the Six Year Review of Existing National Primary Drinking Water Regulations ( Reassessment of Feasibility for Chemical Contaminants). EPA 815 R 03 003. Final. March 2003.

33. USEPA. 2003b. Consideration of Other Regulatory Revisions for Chemical Contaminants in Support of the Six Year Review of National Primary Drinking Water Regulations. EPA 815 R 03 005. Final. March 2003.

34. USEPA. 2003c. EPA Protocol for Review of Existing National Primary Drinking Water Regulations. EPA 815 R 03 002. Final. March 2003.

35. USEPA. 2003d. Occurrence Estimation Methodology and Occurrence Findings Report for the Six Year Regulatory Review of Existing National Primary Drinking Water Regulations. EPA 815 R 03 006. Final. March 2003.

36. USEPA. 2003e. Public Comment and Response Summary for the Six Year Review of National Primary Drinking Water Regulations. EPA 815 R 03 001. Final. March 2003.

37. USEPA. 2003f. Six Year Review  Chemical Contaminants  Health Effects Technical Support Document. EPA 822 R 03 008. Final. March 2003.

38. USEPA. 2003g. Water Treatment Technology Feasibility Support Document for Chemical Contaminants; In Support of EPA Six Year Review of National Primary Drinking Water Regulations. EPA 815 R 03 004. Final. March 2003.

39. USEPA. 2003h. Integrated Risk Information System ( IRIS); Announcement of 2003 Program; Request for Information and Announcement of Workshop; Notice. Federal Register. Vol. 68, No. 24, pp. 5870 5873. February 5, 2003. OW 2002 0012 Six Year Review II C C. OMB Review Related Material.

1. Memorandum to the Record. OGWDW. Quality Assurance for the Six Year Review of National Primary Drinking Water Regulations  Addendum. June 25, 2003. 11p.

2. Memorandum to the Record. OGWDW. Changes to the Notice, " National Primary Drinking Water Regulations; Announcement of Completion of EPA's Review of Existing Drinking Water Standards," Based on OMB Review and Comment and Other Technical Edits. June 25, 2003. 2p.

3. Form of Compliance with E. O. 12866 Docket Requirements. 1 p.

4. Summary of Changes Made to Notice in Response to OMB Review. 2003. 1p.

5. Redline/ strikeout version of the " National Primary Drinking Water Regulations; Announcement of Completion of EPA's Review of Existing Drinking Water Standards." 77p.


[Federal Register Volume 76, Number 111 (Thursday, June 9, 2011)]
[Notices]
[Pages 33748-33750]
[FR Doc No: 2011-14229]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission

Combined Notice of Filings

    Take notice that the Commission has received the following Natural
Gas Pipeline Rate and Refund Report filings:

    Docket Numbers: RP11-2124-000.
    Applicants: CenterPoint Energy Gas Transmission Company, LLC.
    Description: CenterPoint Energy Gas Transmission Company, LLC
submits tariff filing per 154.204: CEGT LLC EFT Enhancements to be
effective 7/1/2011.
    Filed Date: 05/24/2011.
    Accession Number: 20110524-5121.
    Comment Date: 5 p.m. Eastern Time on Monday, June 06, 2011.

    Docket Numbers: RP11-2125-000.
    Applicants: Big Sandy Pipeline, LLC.
    Description: Big Sandy Pipeline, LLC submits tariff filing per
154.204: Big Sandy Contract Assignment Filing to be effective 6/1/2011.
    Filed Date: 05/25/2011.
    Accession Number: 20110525-5079.
    Comment Date: 5 p.m. Eastern Time on Monday, June 06, 2011.

    Docket Numbers: RP11-2126-000.
    Applicants: Gulf South Pipeline Company, LP.
    Description: Gulf South Pipeline Company, LP submits tariff filing
per 154.204: Enbridge 34685 to BP 38842 Capacity Release Negotiated
Rate Agreement Filing to be effective 6/1/2011.
    Filed Date: 05/26/2011.
    Accession Number: 20110526-5020.
    Comment Date: 5 p.m. Eastern Time on Tuesday, June 07, 2011.

    Docket Numbers: RP11-2127-000.
    Applicants: Sabine Pass Liquefaction, LLC.
    Description: Sabine Pass Liquefaction, LLC submits Petition for
Declaratory Order, or in the Alternative, Request for Waivers and
Expedited Consideration.
    Filed Date: 05/25/2011.
    Accession Number: 20110525-5113.

    Comment Date: 5 p.m. Eastern Time on Monday, June 06, 2011.

    Docket Numbers: RP11-2128-000.
    Applicants: Equitrans, L.P.
    Description: Equitrans, L.P. submits tariff filing per 154.203:
Equitrans' Tariff Compliance Filing Docket No. CP11-43-000 to be
effective 6/25/2011.
    Filed Date: 05/26/2011.
    Accession Number: 20110526-5116.
    Comment Date: 5 p.m. Eastern Time on Tuesday, June 07, 2011.

    Docket Numbers: RP11-2129-000.
    Applicants: ETC Tiger Pipeline, LLC.
    Description: ETC Tiger Pipeline, LLC submits tariff filing per
154.403(d)(2): ETC Tiger 2011--05--26 Out of Cycle Fuel Filing to be
effective 7/1/2011.
    Filed Date: 05/26/2011.
    Accession Number: 20110526-5120.
    Comment Date: 5 p.m. Eastern Time on Tuesday, June 07, 2011.

    Docket Numbers: RP11-2130-000.
    Applicants: Gulf Crossing Pipeline Company LLC.
    Description: Gulf Crossing Pipeline Company LLC submits tariff
filing per 154.204: Antero2 to Tenaska203 Capacity Release Negotiated
Rate Agreement Filing to be effective 6/1/2011.
    Filed Date: 05/26/2011.
    Accession Number: 20110526-5132.
    Comment Date: 5 p.m. Eastern Time on Tuesday, June 07, 2011.

    Docket Numbers: RP11-2131-000.
    Applicants: Tennessee Gas Pipeline Company.
    Description: Tennessee Gas Pipeline Company submits tariff filing
per 154.203: Compliance Motion Rate Case Sheets to be effective 6/1/
2011.
    Filed Date: 05/26/2011.
    Accession Number: 20110526-5172.
    Comment Date: 5 p.m. Eastern Time on Tuesday, June 07, 2011.

    Docket Numbers: RP11-2132-000.
    Applicants: Gas Transmission Northwest Corporation.
    Description: Gas Transmission Northwest Corporation submits tariff
filing per 154.204: GTN Housekeeping to be effective 6/27/2011.
    Filed Date: 05/26/2011.
    Accession Number: 20110526-5192.
    Comment Date: 5 p.m. Eastern Time on Tuesday, June 07, 2011.

    Docket Numbers: RP11-2133-000.
    Applicants: Big Sandy Pipeline, LLC.
    Description: Big Sandy Pipeline, LLC submits tariff filing per
154.204: Negotiated Rate Service Agreement Filing to be effective 6/1/
2011.
    Filed Date: 05/27/2011.
    Accession Number: 20110527-5006.
    Comment Date: 5 p.m. Eastern Time on Wednesday, June 08, 2011.

    Docket Numbers: RP11-2134-000.
    Applicants: Columbia Gulf Transmission Company.
    Description: Columbia Gulf Transmission Company submits a Request
for Limited Waiver of Tariff Provisions.
    Filed Date: 05/26/2011.
    Accession Number: 20110526-5199.
    Comment Date: 5 p.m. Eastern Time on Thursday, June 02, 2011.

    Docket Numbers: RP11-2135-000.
    Applicants: Southern Star Central Gas Pipeline, Inc.
    Description: Southern Star Central Gas Pipeline, Inc. submits
tariff filing per 154.204: Scheduling Priorities Filing--2011 to be
effective 10/1/2011.
    Filed Date: 05/27/2011.
    Accession Number: 20110527-5036.
    Comment Date: 5 p.m. Eastern Time on Wednesday, June 08, 2011.

    Docket Numbers: RP11-2136-000.
    Applicants: Dominion Cove Point LNG, LP.
    Description: Dominion Cove Point LNG, LP submits tariff filing per
154.204: DCP-LNG Import Modifications to be effective 6/26/2011.
    Filed Date: 05/27/2011.
    Accession Number: 20110527-5046.
    Comment Date: 5 p.m. Eastern Time on Wednesday, June 08, 2011.

    Docket Numbers: RP11-2137-000.
    Applicants: Dominion Cove Point LNG, LP.
    Description: Dominion Cove Point LNG, LP submits tariff filing per
154.312: DCP-2011 Section 4 General Rate Case to be effective 7/1/2011.
    Filed Date: 05/27/2011.
    Accession Number: 20110527-5086.
    Comment Date: 5 p.m. Eastern Time on Wednesday, June 08, 2011.

    Docket Numbers: RP11-2138-000.
    Applicants: ETC Tiger Pipeline, LLC.
    Description: ETC Tiger Pipeline, LLC submits tariff filing per
154.203: ETC Tiger Phase I Expansion--Compliance Filing to be effective
8/1/2011.
    Filed Date: 05/27/2011.
    Accession Number: 20110527-5114.
    Comment Date: 5 p.m. Eastern Time on Wednesday, June 08, 2011.

    Docket Numbers: RP11-2139-000.
    Applicants: Transcontinental Gas Pipe Line Company.
    Description: Transcontinental Gas Pipe Line Company, LLC submits
tariff filing per 154.204: Clean Up of Tariff References to be
effective 7/1/2011.
    Filed Date: 05/27/2011.
    Accession Number: 20110527-5142.
    Comment Date: 5 p.m. Eastern Time on Wednesday, June 08, 2011.

    Docket Numbers: RP11-2140-000.
    Applicants: Gulf South Pipeline Company, LP.
    Description: Gulf South Pipeline Company, LP submits tariff filing
per 154.204: QEP 36601-6 Amendment to Negotiated Rate Agreement Filing
to be effective 6/1/2011.
    Filed Date: 05/27/2011.
    Accession Number: 20110527-5147.
    Comment Date: 5 p.m. Eastern Time on Wednesday, June 08, 2011.

    Docket Numbers: RP11-2141-000.
    Applicants: Kinder Morgan Louisiana Pipeline LLC.
    Description: Kinder Morgan Louisiana Pipeline LLC submits tariff
filing per 154.403: Periodic Rate Adjustment Filing to be effective 7/
1/2011.
    Filed Date: 05/27/2011.
    Accession Number: 20110527-5193.
    Comment Date: 5 p.m. Eastern Time on Wednesday, June 08, 2011.

    Docket Numbers: RP11-2142-000.
    Applicants: Rockies Express Pipeline LLC.
    Description: Form of Rockies Express Pipeline LLC Penalty Charge
Reconciliation Filing.
    Filed Date: 05/27/2011.
    Accession Number: 20110527-5203.
    Comment Date: 5 p.m. Eastern Time on Wednesday, June 08, 2011.

    Docket Numbers: RP11-2143-000.
    Applicants: Rockies Express Pipeline LLC.
    Description: Rockies Express Pipeline LLC submits tariff filing per
154.204: Negotiated Rate 2011-05-27 BP and Johnstown Regional to be
effective 6/1/2011.
    Filed Date: 05/27/2011.
    Accession Number: 20110527-5206.
    Comment Date: 5 p.m. Eastern Time on Wednesday, June 08, 2011.

    Docket Numbers: RP11-2144-000.
    Applicants: Freebird Gas Storage, L.L.C.
    Description: Freebird Gas Storage, L.L.C. submits tariff filing per
154.204: Freebird Gas Storage, LLC, Change to FERC Gas Tariff to be
effective 5/25/2011.
    Filed Date: 05/27/2011.
    Accession Number: 20110527-5236.
    Comment Date: 5 p.m. Eastern Time on Wednesday, June 08, 2011.

    Any person desiring to intervene or to protest in any of the above
proceedings must file in accordance with Rules 211 and 214 of the
Commission's Rules of Practice and Procedure (18 CFR 385.211 and
385.214) on or before 5 p.m. Eastern time on the specified comment
date. It is not necessary to separately intervene again in a subdocket
related to a compliance filing if you have previously intervened in the
same docket. Protests will be considered by the Commission in
determining the appropriate action to be taken, but will not serve to
make

protestants parties to the proceeding. Anyone filing a motion to
intervene or protest must serve a copy of that document on the
Applicant. In reference to filings initiating a new proceeding,
interventions or protests submitted on or before the comment deadline
need not be served on persons other than the Applicant.
    The Commission encourages electronic submission of protests and
interventions in lieu of paper, using the FERC Online links at http://www.ferc.gov. To facilitate electronic service, persons with Internet
access who will eFile a document and/or be listed as a contact for an
intervenor must create and validate an eRegistration account using the
eRegistration link. Select the eFiling link to log on and submit the
intervention or protests.
    Persons unable to file electronically should submit an original and
14 copies of the intervention or protest to the Federal Energy
Regulatory Commission, 888 First St., NE., Washington, DC 20426.
    The filings in the above proceedings are accessible in the
Commission's eLibrary system by clicking on the appropriate link in the
above list. They are also available for review in the Commission's
Public Reference Room in Washington, DC. There is an eSubscription link
on the Web site that enables subscribers to receive e-mail notification
when a document is added to a subscribed dockets(s). For assistance
with any FERC Online service, please e-mail<EMAIL_ADDRESS>or call<PHONE_NUMBER> (toll free). For TTY, call<PHONE_NUMBER>.

    Dated: May 31, 2011.
Nathaniel J. Davis, Sr.,
Deputy Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2011-14229 Filed 6-8-11; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6717-01-P


[Federal Register Volume 84, Number 69 (Wednesday, April 10, 2019)]
[Notices]
[Page 14358]
[FR Doc No: 2019-07084]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission

Notice of Effectiveness of Exempt Wholesale Generator and Foreign
Utility Company Status

------------------------------------------------------------------------

------------------------------------------------------------------------
Athos, LLC..............................  EG19-46-000
Athos II, LLC...........................  EG19-47-000
Terra-Gen CA Windpower Development, LLC.  EG19-48-000
41MB 8ME, LLC...........................  EG19-49-000
Innolith Snook LLC......................  EG19-50-000
Cedar River Transmission, LLC...........  EG19-51-000
Crystal Lake Wind Energy I, LLC.........  EG19-52-000
Crystal Lake Wind Energy II.............  EG19-53-000
Ronaver Energy Limited..................  FC19-2-000
------------------------------------------------------------------------

    Take notice that during the month of March 2019, the status of the
above-captioned entities as Exempt Wholesale Generators or Foreign
Utility Companies became effective by operation of the Commission's
regulations. 18 CFR 366.7(a) (2019).

    Dated: April 4, 2019.
Nathaniel J. Davis, Sr.,
Deputy Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2019-07084 Filed 4-9-19; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6717-01-P