[Federal Register: March 23, 2009 (Volume 74, Number 54)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Page 12089-12091]
[DOCID:fr23mr09-10]

=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY

Coast Guard

33 CFR Part 165

[Docket No. USCG-2008-1026]
RIN 1625-AA00

Safety Zone; Saugus River, Lynn, MA

AGENCY: Coast Guard, DHS.

ACTION: Temporary final rule.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Coast Guard is adopting the interim safety zone published
on December 29, 2008, as a temporary final rule. This rule creates a
safety zone for a portion of the Saugus River in Lynn, Massachusetts as
requested by the Massachusetts Highway Department (MHD), to allow for
vital repair work to commence on the Route 107/Fox Hill Bridge during
the winter and spring months. This zone is necessary to protect
mariners from the potential hazards associated with the work being
conducted by the Commonwealth of Massachusetts in making critical
repairs to the bridge while it is closed to transiting vessels and
vehicular traffic.

DATES: Effective March 23, 2009, the interim rule amending 33 CFR Part
165 which was published at 73 FR 79363 on 29 December, 2008 is adopted
without change as a temporary final rule.

ADDRESSES: Comments and material received from the public, as well as
documents mentioned in this preamble as being available in the docket,
are part of docket USCG-2008-1026 and are available online by going to
http://www.regulations.gov, selecting the Advanced Docket Search option
on the right side of the screen, inserting USCG-2008-1026 in the Docket
ID box, pressing Enter, and then clicking on the item in the Docket ID
column. This material is also available for inspection or copying at
two locations: The Docket Management Facility (M-30), U.S. Department
of Transportation, West Building Ground Floor, Room W12-140, 1200 New
Jersey Avenue, SE., Washington, DC 20590, between 9 a.m. and 5 p.m.,
Monday through Friday, except Federal holidays and United States Coast
Guard Sector Boston, 427 Commercial St, Boston, MA 02109 between 7 a.m.
and 3 p.m., Monday through Friday, except Federal holidays.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: If you have questions on this
temporary rule, call Chief Petty Officer Eldridge McFadden, Waterways
Management at<PHONE_NUMBER>. If you have questions on viewing the
docket, call Renee V.

Wright, Program Manager, Docket Operations, telephone<PHONE_NUMBER>.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

Regulatory Information

    On December 29, 2008, we published an interim rule with request for
comments entitled ``Safety Zone, Saugus River, Lynn, MA'' in the
Federal Register (73 FR 79363). We did not receive any letters
commenting on the interim rule. No public meeting was requested, and
none was held.

Background and Purpose

    A meeting between the Coast Guard, local lobstermen, local marina
operators, lobster purchasing agents, and the bridge owner, MHD, was
held on September 10, 2008. The owner of the bridge presented
engineering evidence of the poor condition of the bridge and the need
to perform major bridge repairs during the winter months. It was
concluded that in order to keep the bridge operating safely and
reliably until the major repairs can commence, the number of bridge
openings must be reduced to save wear and tear on the mechanical
components. A temporary deviation from standard bridge operation was
deemed necessary in order to insure that the bridge continues to
operate in a safe and reliable manner until the major repairs can be
made. No objection to the proposed temporary deviation schedule was
voiced by interested parties. In a rulemaking supporting that decision,
the Coast Guard published a temporary change to the Saugus Drawbridge
Operation regulations (USCG-2008-0969) in the Federal Register on
October 15, 2008 (73 FR 60954) allowing a deviation of the drawbridge
operating guidelines. That regulation, effective from October 15, 2008
through December 15, 2008, allowed the bridge to remain closed, opening
on signal only on the half hour and hour.
    In addition, the long term repairs may only take place by closing
the bridge to both vehicular and vessel traffic, and removing portions
of the bridge for work. Massachusetts Highway Department must bring in
a large crane barge in order to conduct work on the bridge. This barge
will be crossing the river, effectively restricting the use of the
river. Frequently moving the barge to allow vessel traffic to pass is
contrary to the public interest as it would further delay the bridge
repairs well into the summer months, which are the primary boating and
fishing seasons in Massachusetts. In order the assist the local
lobstermen, MHD proposed to install a temporary dock system on the
downstream of the existing bridge to mitigate the impacts of closing
the bridge and blocking the channel with a large work barge. During the
meeting the lobstermen indicated that the proposed dates for the bridge
closure and waterway restriction along with the installation of a
temporary dock system would be a good compromise that would satisfy
their needs and still allow the rehabilitation bridge repairs to be
completed late May 2009.
    An additional meeting between the Coast Guard, town officials,
harbormaster and MHD took place on December 4, 2008 at which time the
MHD agreed to work with affected waterway users to remove the crane
barge restricting the waterway on no more than six occasions during the
repair process to allow vessels, that are able, to pass beneath the
bridge while in a closed position.
    On December 10, 2008, Captain of the Port Boston signed an Interim
Rule creating a safety zone upriver of the Route 107/Fox Hill Bridge on
the Saugus River in Lynn, MA. That rule was subsequently published in
the Federal Register on 29 December 2008 as (73 FR 79363). We did not
receive comments on the interim rule.

Discussion of Rule

    The COTP Boston is adopting the currently effective interim rule,
reflected in 33 CFR 165.T01-1026, as a temporary final rule. This rule
establishes a safety zone that prohibits vessels from coming within 50
yards of the upriver side of 107/Fox Hill Bridge in the Saugus River in
Lynn, Massachusetts. While this safety zone has the practical effect of
closing a portion of the waterway, the Captain of the Port anticipates
minimal negative impact on vessel traffic because (1) Recreational
boating traffic is limited this particular time of year, (2) the MHD
has made alternate mooring and docking arrangements for the fishermen
which typically dock on the up river side of the bridge, and (3) MHD
will remove the crane barge restricting waterway access under the
bridge on at least six occasions allowing vessel traffic, which may do
so, to pass beneath the closed bridge. Public notifications will be
made prior to and during the effective period via Local and Broadcast
Notice to Mariners.

Regulatory Analyses

    We are adopting the interim rule as a temporary final rule after
considering numerous statutes and executive orders related to
rulemaking. Below we summarize our analyses based on 13 of these
statutes or executive orders.

Regulatory Planning and Review

    This rule is not a significant regulatory action under section 3(f)
of Executive Order 12866, Regulatory Planning and Review, and does not
require an assessment of potential costs and benefits under section
6(a)(3) of that Order. The Office of Management and Budget has not
reviewed it under that Order.
    The Coast Guard expects the economic impact of this temporary rule
to be so minimal that a full Regulatory Evaluation is unnecessary.
Although this rule may prevent traffic from transiting a portion of the
Saugus River during the bridge repairs, the effect of this rule will
not be significant for several reasons: Alternate arrangements for the
offload and mooring of fishing vessels have been made, recreational
boaters typically have their boats out of the water at this time of
year in order to protect them from winter icing, MHD will remove the
crane barge restricting waterway access on at least six occasions as
requested by a waterway users (during which times vessel operators may
request permission to transit through the safety zone promulgated by
this rule), and continued notifications will be made to the local
maritime community by broadcast and local notice to mariners.

Small Entities

    Under the Regulatory Flexibility Act (5 U.S.C. 601-612), we have
considered whether this rule would have a significant economic impact
on a substantial number of small entities. The term ``small entities''
comprises small businesses, not-for-profit organizations that are
independently owned and operated and are not dominant in their fields,
and governmental jurisdictions with populations of less than 50,000.
    The Coast Guard certifies under 5 U.S.C. 605(b) that this rule will
not have a significant economic impact on a substantial number of small
entities.
    This rule will affect the following entities, some of which may be
small entities: The owners or operators of fishing and recreational
vessels intending to transit or anchor in a portion of the Saugus River
from midnight December 14, 2008 through midnight on May 15, 2009. This
closure will not have a significant economic impact on a substantial
number of small entities for the reasons described under the Regulatory
Planning and Review section.

Assistance for Small Entities

    Under section 213(a) of the Small Business Regulatory Enforcement

Fairness Act of 1996 (Pub. L. 104-121), we offer to assist small
entities in understanding the rule so that they could better evaluate
its effects on them and participate in the rulemaking process.
    Small businesses may send comments on the actions of Federal
employees who enforce, or otherwise determine compliance with, Federal
regulations to the Small Business and Agriculture Regulatory
Enforcement Ombudsman and the Regional Small Business Regulatory
Fairness Boards. The Ombudsman evaluates these actions annually and
rates each agency's responsiveness to small business. If you wish to
comment on actions by employees of the Coast Guard, call 1-888-REG-FAIR
(1-888-734-3247). The Coast Guard will not retaliate against small
entities that question or complain about this rule or any policy or
action of the Coast Guard.

Collection of Information

    This rule calls for no new collection of information under the
Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 (44 U.S.C. 3501-3520).

Federalism

    A rule has implications for federalism under Executive Order 13132,
Federalism, if it has a substantial direct effect on State or local
governments and would either preempt State law or impose a substantial
direct cost of compliance on them. We have analyzed this rule under
that Order and have determined that it does not have implications for
federalism.

Unfunded Mandates Reform Act

    The Unfunded Mandates Reform Act of 1995 (2 U.S.C. 1531-1538)
requires Federal agencies to assess the effects of their discretionary
regulatory actions. In particular, the Act addresses actions that may
result in the expenditure by a State, local, or tribal government, in
the aggregate, or by the private sector of $100,000,000 or more in any
one year. Though this rule will not result in such an expenditure, we
do discuss the effects of this rule elsewhere in this preamble.

Taking of Private Property

    This rule will not effect a taking of private property or otherwise
have taking implications under Executive Order 12630, Governmental
Actions and Interference with Constitutionally Protected Property
Rights.

Civil Justice Reform

    This rule meets applicable standards in sections 3(a) and 3(b)(2)
of Executive Order 12988, Civil Justice Reform, to minimize litigation,
eliminate ambiguity, and reduce burden.

Protection of Children

    We have analyzed this rule under Executive Order 13045, Protection
of Children from Environmental Health Risks and Safety Risks. This rule
is not an economically significant rule and does not create an
environmental risk to health or risk to safety that may
disproportionately affect children.

Indian Tribal Governments

    This rule does not have tribal implications under Executive Order
13175, Consultation and Coordination with Indian Tribal Governments,
because it does not have a substantial direct effect on one or more
Indian tribes, on the relationship between the Federal Government and
Indian tribes, or on the distribution of power and responsibilities
between the Federal Government and Indian tribes.

Energy Effects

    We have analyzed this rule under Executive Order 13211, Actions
Concerning Regulations That Significantly Affect Energy Supply,
Distribution, or Use. We have determined that it is not a ``significant
energy action'' under that order because it is not a ``significant
regulatory action'' under Executive Order 12866 and is not likely to
have a significant adverse effect on the supply, distribution, or use
of energy. The Administrator of the Office of Information and
Regulatory Affairs has not designated it as a significant energy
action. Therefore, it does not require a Statement of Energy Effects
under Executive Order 13211.

Technical Standards

    The National Technology Transfer and Advancement Act (NTTAA) (15
U.S.C. 272 note) directs agencies to use voluntary consensus standards
in their regulatory activities unless the agency provides Congress,
through the Office of Management and Budget, with an explanation of why
using these standards would be inconsistent with applicable law or
otherwise impractical. Voluntary consensus standards are technical
standards (e.g., specifications of materials, performance, design, or
operation; test methods; sampling procedures; and related management
systems practices) that are developed or adopted by voluntary consensus
standards bodies.
    This rule does not use technical standards. Therefore, we did not
consider the use of voluntary consensus standards.

Environment

    We have analyzed this rule under Department of Homeland Security
Management Directive 0023.1 and Commandant Instruction M16475.lD, which
guide the Coast Guard in complying with the National Environmental
Policy Act of 1969 (NEPA) (42 U.S.C. 4321-4370f), and have concluded
this action is one of a category of actions which do not individually
or cumulatively have a significant effect on the human environment.
This rule is categorically excluded, under figure 2-1 paragraph (34)(g)
of the Instruction.
    No comments relating to environmental issues were received in
response to the Interim Rulemaking/Request for Comment, and no
additional environmental concerns have been discovered in connection
with this action. The final environmental analysis checklist and a
categorical exclusion determination are available in the docket where
indicated under ADDRESSES.

List of Subjects in 33 CFR Part 165

    Harbors, Marine safety, Navigation (water), Reporting and
recordkeeping requirements, Security measures, Waterways.

0
For the reasons discussed in the preamble, the Coast Guard amends 33
CFR part 165 as follows:

PART 165--REGULATED NAVIGATION AREAS AND LIMITED ACCESS AREAS

0
For the reasons discussed in the preamble, under authority of 33 U.S.C.
1226, 1231; 46 U.S.C. Chapter 701, 3306, 3703; 50 U.S.C. 191, 195; 33
CFR 1.05-1, 6.04-1, 6.04-6, and 160.5; Public Law 107-295, 116 Stat.
2064; Department of Homeland Security Delegation No. 0170.1., the
interim rule amending 33 CFR 165.T01-1026 that was published at 73 FR
79363 on 29 December, 2008 is adopted without change as a temporary
final rule.

    Dated: February 17, 2009.
Gail P. Kulisch,
Captain, U.S. Coast Guard, Captain of the Port Boston.
 [FR Doc. E9-6186 Filed 3-20-09; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4910-15-P


[Federal Register Volume 79, Number 232 (Wednesday, December 3, 2014)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Pages 71672-71674]
[FR Doc No: 2014-28291]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY

40 CFR Part 52

[EPA-R05-OAR-2014-0747; FRL-9919-83-Region 5]

Approval and Promulgation of Air Quality Implementation Plans;
Indiana

AGENCY: Environmental Protection Agency.

ACTION: Direct final rule.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) is approving a
request submitted by the Indiana Department of Environmental Management
(IDEM) on September 17, 2014, to revise the Indiana state
implementation plan (SIP). The submission revises the Indiana
Administrative Code (IAC) definition of ``References to the Code of
Federal Regulations,'' from the 2011 edition to the 2013 edition. There
is also a revised definition of ``Board.''

DATES: This rule is effective on February 2, 2015, unless EPA receives
adverse comments by January 2, 2015. If adverse comments are received,
EPA will publish a timely withdrawal of the direct final rule in the
Federal Register informing the public that the rule will not take
effect.

ADDRESSES: Submit your comments, identified by Docket ID No. EPA-R05-
OAR-2014-0747 by one of the following methods:
    1. www.regulations.gov: Follow the on-line instructions for
submitting comments.
    2. Email<EMAIL_ADDRESS>    3. Fax:<PHONE_NUMBER>.
    4. Mail: Pamela Blakley, Chief, Control Strategies Section, Air
Programs Branch (AR-18J), U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, 77 West
Jackson Boulevard, Chicago, Illinois 60604.
    5. Hand Delivery: Pamela Blakley, Chief, Control Strategies
Section, Air Programs Branch (AR-18J), U.S. Environmental Protection
Agency, 77 West Jackson Boulevard, Chicago, Illinois 60604. Such
deliveries are only accepted during the Regional Office normal hours of
operation, and special arrangements should be made for deliveries of
boxed information. The Regional Office official hours of business are
Monday through Friday, 8:30 a.m. to 4:30 p.m. excluding Federal
holidays.
    Instructions: Direct your comments to Docket ID No. EPA-R05-OAR-
2014-0747. EPA's policy is that all comments received will be included
in the public docket without change and may be made available online at
www.regulations.gov, including any personal information provided,
unless the comment includes information claimed to be Confidential
Business Information (CBI) or other information whose disclosure is
restricted by statute. Do not submit information that you consider to
be CBI or otherwise protected through www.regulations.gov or email. The
www.regulations.gov Web site is an ``anonymous access'' system, which
means EPA will not know your identity or contact information unless you
provide it in the body of your comment. If you send an email comment
directly to EPA without going through www.regulations.gov your email
address will be automatically captured and included as part of the
comment that is placed in the public docket and made available on the
Internet. If you submit an electronic comment, EPA recommends that you
include your name and other contact information in the body of your
comment and with any disk or CD-ROM you submit. If EPA cannot read your
comment due to technical difficulties and cannot contact you for
clarification, EPA may not be able to consider your comment. Electronic
files should avoid the use of special characters, any form of
encryption, and be free of any defects or viruses.
    Docket: All documents in the docket are listed in the
www.regulations.gov index. Although listed in the index, some
information is not publicly available, e.g., CBI or other information
whose disclosure is restricted by statute. Certain other material, such
as copyrighted material, will be publicly

available only in hard copy. Publicly available docket materials are
available either electronically in www.regulations.gov or in hard copy
at the Environmental Protection Agency, Region 5, Air and Radiation
Division, 77 West Jackson Boulevard, Chicago, Illinois 60604. This
facility is open from 8:30 a.m. to 4:30 p.m., Monday through Friday,
excluding Federal holidays. We recommend that you telephone Charles
Hatten, Environmental Engineer, at<PHONE_NUMBER> before visiting the
Region 5 office.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Charles Hatten, Environmental
Engineer, Control Strategies Section, Air Programs Branch (AR-18J),
Environmental Protection Agency, Region 5, 77 West Jackson Boulevard,
Chicago, Illinois 60604,<PHONE_NUMBER><EMAIL_ADDRESS>
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Throughout this document whenever ``we,''
``us,'' or ``our'' is used, we mean EPA. This supplementary information
section is arranged as follows:

I. What is the background for this action?
II. What revision did the State request be incorporated into the
SIP?
III. What action is EPA taking?
IV. Statutory and Executive Order Reviews

I. What is the background for this action?

    On September 17, 2014, IDEM submitted a request to revise the
definitions of ``References to the Code of Federal Regulations,'' and
``Board.''
    On March 19, 2014, IDEM published a ``Notice of Public
Information'' in several newspapers, and on their Web site at http://www.in.gov/idem/6777.htm, providing a 30-day public comment period on
the proposed revision to its SIP concerning updates to definitions of
``References to the Code of Federal Regulations,'' and ``Board.'' The
notice also informed the public that a hearing was scheduled for April
9, 2014. A public hearing was held on April 9, 2014. IDEM did not
receive any comments.

II. What revision did the State request be incorporated into the SIP?

    IDEM has requested that revisions to Indiana's SIP include:

Rule 326 IAC 1-1-3, Definition of ``References to Code of Federal
Regulations''

    IDEM updated the reference to the Code of Federal Regulations (CFR)
in 326 IAC 1-1-3 from the 2011 edition to the 2013 edition. This is
solely an administrative change that allows Indiana to reference a more
current version of the CFR. By amending 326 IAC 1-1-3 to reference the
most current version of the CFR, the provision in Title 326 of the IAC
will be consistent and current with Federal regulations.

Rule 326 IAC 1-2-6.5, Definition of ``Board''

    IDEM made a minor revision to its definition of ``Board.''
Currently, SIP rule 326 IAC 1-2-6.5 defines ``Board'' as the ``air
pollution control board,'' i.e., the Indiana Air Pollution Control
Board. In 2013, the Air Pollution Control Board, Water Pollution
Control Board, and the Solid Waste Management Board were consolidated
into the new Environmental Rules Board. The rule has been revised to
reflect this consolidation of boards in the state rules.

III. What action is EPA taking?

    EPA is approving revisions to the Indiana SIP to update 326 IAC 1-
1-3, ``References to the Code of Federal Register'', and the definition
of ``Board,'' at 326 IAC 1-2-6.5.
    We are publishing this action without prior proposal because we
view this as a noncontroversial amendment and anticipate no adverse
comments. However, in the proposed rules section of this Federal
Register publication, we are publishing a separate document that will
serve as the proposal to approve the state plan if relevant adverse
written comments are filed. This rule will be effective February 2,
2015 without further notice unless we receive relevant adverse written
comments by January 2, 2015. If we receive such comments, we will
withdraw this action before the effective date by publishing a
subsequent document that will withdraw the final action. All public
comments received will then be addressed in a subsequent final rule
based on the proposed action. The EPA will not institute a second
comment period. Any parties interested in commenting on this action
should do so at this time. If we do not receive any comments, this
action will be effective February 2, 2015.

IV. Statutory and Executive Order Reviews

    Under the Clean Air Act, the Administrator is required to approve a
SIP submission that complies with the provisions of the Clean Air Act
and applicable Federal regulations. 42 U.S.C. 7410(k); 40 CFR 52.02(a).
Thus, in reviewing SIP submissions, EPA's role is to approve state
choices, provided that they meet the criteria of the Clean Air Act.
Accordingly, this action merely approves state law as meeting Federal
requirements and does not impose additional requirements beyond those
imposed by state law. For that reason, this action:
     Is not a ``significant regulatory action'' subject to
review by the Office of Management and Budget under Executive Order
12866 (58 FR 51735, October 4, 1993);
     Does not impose an information collection burden under the
provisions of the Paperwork Reduction Act (44 U.S.C. 3501 et seq.);
     Is certified as not having a significant economic impact
on a substantial number of small entities under the Regulatory
Flexibility Act (5 U.S.C. 601 et seq.);
     Does not contain any unfunded mandate or significantly or
uniquely affect small governments, as described in the Unfunded
Mandates Reform Act of 1995 (Pub. L. 104-4);
     Does not have Federalism implications as specified in
Executive Order 13132 (64 FR 43255, August 10, 1999);
     Is not an economically significant regulatory action based
on health or safety risks subject to Executive Order 13045 (62 FR
19885, April 23, 1997);
     Is not a significant regulatory action subject to
Executive Order 13211 (66 FR 28355, May 22, 2001);
     Is not subject to requirements of Section 12(d) of the
National Technology Transfer and Advancement Act of 1995 (15 U.S.C. 272
note) because application of those requirements would be inconsistent
with the Clean Air Act; and
     Does not provide EPA with the discretionary authority to
address, as appropriate, disproportionate human health or environmental
effects, using practicable and legally permissible methods, under
Executive Order 12898 (59 FR 7629, February 16, 1994).
    This rule is not approved to apply on any Indian reservation land
or in any other area where EPA or an Indian tribe has demonstrated that
a tribe has jurisdiction. In those areas of Indian country, the rule
does not have tribal implications as specified by Executive Order
13175, nor will it impose substantial direct costs on Tribal
governments or preempt tribal law.
    The Congressional Review Act, 5 U.S.C. 801 et seq., as added by the
Small Business Regulatory Enforcement Fairness Act of 1996, generally
provides that before a rule may take effect, the agency promulgating
the rule must submit a rule report, which includes a copy of the rule,
to each House of the Congress and to the Comptroller General of the
United States. EPA will submit a report containing this action and
other required information to the U.S. Senate,

the U.S. House of Representatives, and the Comptroller General of the
United States prior to publication of the rule in the Federal Register.
A major rule cannot take effect until 60 days after it is published in
the Federal Register. This action is not a ``major rule'' as defined by
5 U.S.C. 804(2).
    Under section 307(b)(1) of the Clean Air Act, petitions for
judicial review of this action must be filed in the United States Court
of Appeals for the appropriate circuit by February 2, 2015. Filing a
petition for reconsideration by the Administrator of this final rule
does not affect the finality of this action for the purposes of
judicial review nor does it extend the time within which a petition for
judicial review may be filed, and shall not postpone the effectiveness
of such rule or action. Parties with objections to this direct final
rule are encouraged to file a comment in response to the parallel
notice of proposed rulemaking for this action published in the Proposed
Rules section of today's Federal Register, rather than file an
immediate petition for judicial review of this direct final rule and
address the comment in the proposed rulemaking. This action may not be
challenged later in proceedings to enforce its requirements. (See
section 307(b)(2).)

List of Subjects in 40 CFR Part 52

    Environmental protection, Air pollution control, Carbon monoxide,
Incorporation by reference, Intergovernmental relations, Lead, Nitrogen
dioxide, Ozone, Particulate matter, Reporting and recordkeeping
requirements, Sulfur oxides, Volatile organic compounds.

    Dated: November 17, 2014.
Susan Hedman,
Regional Administrator, Region 5.

    40 CFR part 52 is amended as follows:

PART 52--APPROVAL AND PROMULGATION OF IMPLEMENTATION PLANS

0
1. The authority citation for part 52 continues to read as follows:

    Authority:  42 U.S.C. 7401 et seq.

0
2. In Sec.  52.770 the table in paragraph (c) is amended by:
0
a. Revising the entry in Article 1, General Provisions for Rule 1,
``Provisions Applicable Throughout Title 326'' in 1-1-3 ``References to
the Code of Federal Regulations''; and
0
b. Adding a new entry in numerical order in Article 1, General
Provisions for Rule 2, ``Definitions'', ``1-2-6.5'' ``Board''. The
revised and added text reads as follows:

Sec.  52.770  Identification of plan.

* * * * *
    (c) * * *

                                        EPA-Approved Indiana Regulations
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
                                                              Indiana
        Indiana citation                 Subject          effective date  EPA approval date         Notes
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

                                                  * * * * * * *
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
                                          Article 1. General Provisions
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
                               Rule 1. Provisions Applicable Throughout Title 326
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

                                                  * * * * * * *
1-1-3..........................  References to the Code        8/31/2014  12/03/2014,
                                  of Federal Regulations.                  [insert Federal
                                                                           Register
                                                                           citation].

                                                  * * * * * * *
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
                                               Rule 2. Definitions
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

                                                  * * * * * * *
1-2-6.5........................  Board..................       8/31/2014  12/03/2014,
                                                                           [insert Federal
                                                                           Register
                                                                           citation].

                                                  * * * * * * *
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

* * * * *
[FR Doc. 2014-28291 Filed 12-2-14; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6560-50-P