[Federal Register Volume 78, Number 181 (Wednesday, September 18, 2013)]
[Notices]
[Pages 57373-57374]
[FR Doc No: 2013-22694]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission

[Project No. 2376-048]

Appalachian Power Company; Notice of Application To Increase
Water Withdraw and Construct Water Withdraw Facilty Pursuant to License
Article 202 and Soliciting Comments, Motions To Intervene, Protests,
and Recommendations

    Take notice that the following hydroelectric application has been
filed with the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission (Commission) and is
available for public inspection:
    a. Application Type: License amendment pursuant to article 202.
    b. Project No: 2376-048.
    c. Date Filed: July 31, 2013.
    d. Applicant: Appalachian Power Company (licensee).
    e. Name of Project: Reusens Hydroelectric Project.
    f. Location: The Reusens Project is located on the James River near
the town of Lynchburg, in Amherst and Bedford Counties, Virginia.
    g. Filed Pursuant to: Federal Power Act, 16 U.S.C. 791a-825r.
    h. Applicant Contact: Mr. Frank M. Simms, Hydro Supervisor--Plant
Manager II, Appalachian Power Company, 40 Franklin Road, Roanoke, VA
24011. Phone<PHONE_NUMBER>.
    i. FERC Contact: Mr. Robert Ballantine at<PHONE_NUMBER>,
<EMAIL_ADDRESS>    j. Deadline for filing comments, motions to intervene, protests,
and recommendations: October 14, 2013.
    The Commission strongly encourages electronic filing. Please file
motions to intervene, protests, comments, or recommendations using the
Commission's eFiling system at http://www.ferc.gov/docs-filing/efiling.asp. Commenters can submit brief comments up to 6,000
characters, without prior registration, using the eComment system at
http://www.ferc.gov/docs-filing/ecomment.asp. You must include your
name and contact information at the end of your comments. For
assistance, please contact FERC Online Support at
<EMAIL_ADDRESS>(866) 208-3676 (toll free), or (202) 502-
8659 (TTY). In lieu of electronic filing, please send a paper copy to:
Secretary, Federal Energy Regulatory Commission, 888 First Street NE.,
Washington, DC 20426. Please include the project number (P-2376-048) on
any comments, motions to intervene, protests, or recommendations filed.
    k. Description of Request: Appalachian Power Company, licensee for
the Reusens Hydroelectric Project, requests the Commission to amend
license article 202 and the Commission's December 3, 2010, order
approving non-project use of project waters. The Commission's December
3, 2010 order, authorizes the licensee to allow Amherst County Service
Authority (ACSA) to install and operate a temporary water withdraw
facility with a 2 million gallons per day (MGD) withdraw limit. The
licensee is requesting the Commission grant it non-project use of
project lands and waters for the ACSA to construct permanent water
withdraw facilities within the project boundary and to increase the
water withdraw limit from 2 MGD to a maximum of 3 MGD.
    l. Locations of the Application: A copy of the application is
available for inspection and reproduction at the Commission's Public
Reference Room, located at 888 First Street NE., Room 2A, Washington,
DC 20426, or by calling<PHONE_NUMBER>. This filing may also be viewed on
the Commission's Web site at http://www.ferc.gov using the ``eLibrary''
link. Enter the docket number excluding the last three digits in the
docket number field to access the document. You may also register
online at http://www.ferc.gov/docs-filing/esubscription.asp to be
notified via email of new filings and issuances related to this or
other pending projects. For assistance, call<PHONE_NUMBER> or email
<EMAIL_ADDRESS>for TTY, call<PHONE_NUMBER>. A copy is also
available for inspection and reproduction at the address in item (h)
above.
    m. Individuals desiring to be included on the Commission's mailing
list should so indicate by writing to the Secretary of the Commission.
    n. Comments, Motions to Intervene, Protests, and Recommendations:
Anyone may submit comments, motion to intervene, protests, or

recommendations in accordance with the requirements of Rules of
Practice and Procedure, 18 CFR 385.210, .211, .214. In determining the
appropriate action to take, the Commission will consider all comments,
protests, or recommendations filed, but only those who file a motion to
intervene in accordance with the Commission's Rules may become a party
to the proceeding. Any comments, motions to intervene, protests, or
recommendations must be received on or before the specified comment
date for the particular application (October 14, 2013).
    o. Filing and Service of Responsive Documents: Any filing must (1)
bear in all capital letters the title ``COMMENTS'', ``PROTESTS'',
``RECOMMENDATIONS'', or ``MOTION TO INTERVENE'' as applicable; (2) set
forth in the heading the name of the applicant and the project number
of the application to which the filing responds; (3) furnish the name,
address, and telephone number of the person protesting or intervening;
and (4) otherwise comply with the requirements of 18 CFR 385.2001
through 385.2005. All comments, protests, recommendations, or motions
to intervene must set forth their evidentiary basis and otherwise
comply with the requirements of 18 CFR 4.34(b). Agencies may obtain
copies of the application directly from the applicant. A copy of any
protest or motion to intervene must be served upon each representative
of the applicant specified in the particular application. If an
intervener files comments or documents with the Commission relating to
the merits of an issue that may affect the responsibilities of a
particular resource agency, they must also serve a copy of the document
on that resource agency. A copy of all other filings in reference to
this application must be accompanied by proof of service on all persons
listed in the service list prepared by the Commission in this
proceeding, in accordance with 18 CFR 4.34(b) and 385.2010.

    Dated: September 12, 2013.
Kimberly D. Bose,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2013-22694 Filed 9-17-13; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6717-01-P


[Federal Register Volume 81, Number 24 (Friday, February 5, 2016)]
[Notices]
[Pages 6332-6333]
[FR Doc No: 2016-02298]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION

Federal Motor Carrier Safety Administration

[FMCSA Docket No. FMCSA-2015-0337]

Qualification of Drivers; Exemption Applications; Diabetes
Mellitus

AGENCY: Federal Motor Carrier Safety Administration (FMCSA), DOT.

ACTION: Notice of final disposition.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: FMCSA confirms its decision to exempt 44 individuals from its
rule prohibiting persons with insulin-treated diabetes mellitus (ITDM)
from operating commercial motor vehicles (CMVs) in interstate commerce.
The exemptions enable these individuals to operate CMVs in interstate
commerce.

DATES: The exemptions were effective on December 29, 2015. The
exemptions expire on December 29, 2017.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Christine A. Hydock, Chief, Medical
Programs Division,<PHONE_NUMBER><EMAIL_ADDRESS>FMCSA,
Department of Transportation, 1200 New Jersey Avenue SE, Room W64-113,
Washington, DC 20590-0001. Office hours are from 8:30 a.m. to 5 p.m.
e.t., Monday through Friday, except Federal holidays.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

I. Electronic Access

    You may see all the comments online through the Federal Document
Management System (FDMS) at: http://www.regulations.gov.
    Docket: For access to the docket to read background documents or
comments, go to http://www.regulations.gov and/or Room W12-140 on the
ground level of the West Building, 1200 New Jersey Avenue SE.,
Washington, DC, between 9 a.m. and 5 p.m., Monday through Friday,
except Federal holidays.
    Privacy Act: In accordance with 5 U.S.C. 553(c), DOT solicits
comments from the public to better inform its rulemaking process. DOT
posts these comments, without edit, including any personal information
the commenter provides, to www.regulations.gov, as described in the
system of records notice (DOT/ALL-14 FDMS), which can be reviewed at
www.dot.gov/privacy.

II. Background

    On November 27, 2015, FMCSA published a notice of receipt of
Federal diabetes exemption applications from 44 individuals and
requested comments from the public (80 FR 74190). The public comment
period closed on December 28, 2015, and no comments were received.
    FMCSA has evaluated the eligibility of the 44 applicants and
determined that granting the exemptions to these individuals would
achieve a level of safety equivalent to or greater than the level that
would be achieved by complying with the current regulation 49 CFR
391.41(b)(3).

Diabetes Mellitus and Driving Experience of the Applicants

    The Agency established the current requirement for diabetes in 1970
because several risk studies indicated that drivers with diabetes had a
higher rate of crash involvement than the general population. The
diabetes rule provides that ``A person is physically qualified to drive
a commercial motor vehicle if that person has no established medical
history or clinical diagnosis of diabetes mellitus currently requiring
insulin for control'' (49 CFR 391.41(b)(3)).
    FMCSA established its diabetes exemption program, based on the
Agency's July 2000 study entitled ``A Report to Congress on the
Feasibility of a Program to Qualify Individuals with Insulin-Treated
Diabetes Mellitus to Operate in Interstate Commerce as Directed by the
Transportation Act for the 21st Century.'' The report concluded that a
safe and practicable protocol to allow some drivers with ITDM to
operate CMVs is feasible. The September 3, 2003 (68 FR 52441), Federal
Register notice in conjunction with the November 8, 2005 (70 FR 67777),
Federal Register notice provides the current protocol for allowing such
drivers to operate CMVs in interstate commerce.
    These 44 applicants have had ITDM over a range of 1 to 32 years.
These applicants report no severe hypoglycemic reactions resulting in
loss of consciousness or seizure, requiring the assistance of another
person, or resulting in impaired cognitive function that occurred
without warning symptoms, in the past 12 months and no recurrent (2 or
more) severe hypoglycemic episodes in the past 5 years. In each case,
an endocrinologist verified that the driver has demonstrated a
willingness to properly monitor and manage his/her diabetes mellitus,
received education related to diabetes management, and is on a stable
insulin regimen. These drivers report no other disqualifying
conditions, including diabetes-related complications. Each meets the
vision requirement at 49 CFR 391.41(b)(10).
    The qualifications and medical condition of each applicant were
stated and discussed in detail in the November 27, 2015, Federal
Register notice and they will not be repeated in this notice.

III. Discussion of Comments

    FMCSA received no comments in this proceeding.

IV. Basis for Exemption Determination

    Under 49 U.S.C. 31136(e) and 31315, FMCSA may grant an exemption
from the diabetes requirement in 49 CFR 391.41(b)(3) if the exemption
is likely to achieve an equivalent or greater level of safety than
would be achieved without the exemption. The exemption allows the
applicants to operate CMVs in interstate commerce.
    To evaluate the effect of these exemptions on safety, FMCSA
considered medical reports about the applicants' ITDM and vision, and
reviewed the treating endocrinologists' medical opinion related to the
ability of

the driver to safely operate a CMV while using insulin.
    Consequently, FMCSA finds that in each case exempting these
applicants from the diabetes requirement in 49 CFR 391.41(b)(3) is
likely to achieve a level of safety equal to that existing without the
exemption.

V. Conditions and Requirements

    The terms and conditions of the exemption will be provided to the
applicants in the exemption document and they include the following:
(1) That each individual submit a quarterly monitoring checklist
completed by the treating endocrinologist as well as an annual
checklist with a comprehensive medical evaluation; (2) that each
individual reports within 2 business days of occurrence, all episodes
of severe hypoglycemia, significant complications, or inability to
manage diabetes; also, any involvement in an accident or any other
adverse event in a CMV or personal vehicle, whether or not it is
related to an episode of hypoglycemia; (3) that each individual provide
a copy of the ophthalmologist's or optometrist's report to the medical
examiner at the time of the annual medical examination; and (4) that
each individual provide a copy of the annual medical certification to
the employer for retention in the driver's qualification file, or keep
a copy in his/her driver's qualification file if he/she is self-
employed. The driver must also have a copy of the certification when
driving, for presentation to a duly authorized Federal, State, or local
enforcement official.

VI. Conclusion

    Based upon its evaluation of the 44 exemption applications, FMCSA
exempts the following drivers from the diabetes requirement in 49 CFR
391.41(b)(10), subject to the requirements cited above 949 CFR
391.64(b)):

Michael E. Adrieansen (IL)
David A. August (CO)
Samuel M. Balis (PA)
Dwight J. Banks (IL)
David R. Bauman, III (MI)
George E. Britt (PA)
Cris A. Brown (MI)
Dustin D. Brown (WI)
Thomas W. Camp (VA)
Nathan G. Carnes (OR)
Vincenzo A. Cortese (CT)
Vernon L. Davidson (NE)
Damian DiFlorio (NJ)
Matthew D. Fox (IN)
Sammy N. Fox (PA)
Chadwick E. Gainey (FL)
Jamal A. George (OH)
John M. Halm (WA)
William R. Hardy (MI)
Craig A. Hendrickson (IL)
William D. Hoopes (OH)
Jeffrey L. Jones (AR)
Brent S. LaBree, II (VT)
Michael C. Landers (MA)
Duane F. Light (CT)
Darold W. Mahlstedt (IA)
Robert L. McConnell (PA)
Mark R.S. McMillan (NY)
Keith R. Miller (WV)
Randall T. Mitchell (AL)
Ernest Nez, Sr. (AZ)
Shawn P. O'Malley (WA)
Felipe N. Perez (FL)
Kenneth W. Phillips (IN)
Tony L. Prouty (IA)
Jim T. Repass (IN)
Jakob K. Siler (OK)
Darren G. Steil (IA)
Steven P. Stokke (WI)
Richard E. Wagner (MN)
Harold W. Welch (NE)
John F. Wesoloski, Jr. (ND)
Levon Wright, Sr. (FL)
Tadeusz S. Wrzesinski (PA)

    In accordance with 49 U.S.C. 31136(e) and 31315 each exemption is
valid for two years unless revoked earlier by FMCSA. The exemption will
be revoked if the following occurs: (1) The person fails to comply with
the terms and conditions of the exemption; (2) the exemption has
resulted in a lower level of safety than was maintained before it was
granted; or (3) continuation of the exemption would not be consistent
with the goals and objectives of 49 U.S.C. 31136(e) and 31315. If the
exemption is still effective at the end of the 2-year period, the
person may apply to FMCSA for a renewal under procedures in effect at
that time.

    Issued on: January 19, 2016.
 Larry W. Minor,
Associate Administrator for Policy.
[FR Doc. 2016-02298 Filed 2-4-16; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910-EX-P


[Federal Register Volume 85, Number 13 (Tuesday, January 21, 2020)]
[Notices]
[Pages 3390-3392]
[FR Doc No: 2020-00873]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES

Food and Drug Administration

[Docket No. FDA-2010-N-0583]

Agency Information Collection Activities; Proposed Collection;
Comment Request; Radioactive Drug Research Committees

AGENCY: Food and Drug Administration, HHS.

ACTION: Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Food and Drug Administration (FDA or Agency) is announcing
an opportunity for public comment on the proposed collection of certain
information by the Agency. Under the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995
(PRA), Federal Agencies are required to publish notice in the Federal
Register concerning each proposed collection of information, including
each proposed extension of an existing collection of information, and
to allow 60 days for public comment in response to the notice. This
notice solicits comments on information collection requirements
contained in regulations governing the use of radioactive drugs for
basic informational research.

DATES: Submit either electronic or written comments on the collection
of information by March 23, 2020.

ADDRESSES: You may submit comments as follows. Please note that late,
untimely filed comments will not be considered. Electronic comments
must be submitted on or before March 23, 2020. The https://www.regulations.gov electronic filing system will accept comments until
11:59 p.m. Eastern Time at the end of March 23, 2020. Comments received
by mail/hand delivery/courier (for written/paper submissions) will be
considered timely if they are postmarked or the delivery service
acceptance receipt is on or before that date.

Electronic Submissions

    Submit electronic comments in the following way:
     Federal eRulemaking Portal: https://www.regulations.gov.
Follow the instructions for submitting comments. Comments submitted
electronically, including attachments, to https://www.regulations.gov
will be posted to the docket unchanged. Because your comment will be
made public, you are solely responsible for ensuring that your comment
does not include any confidential information that you or a third party
may not wish to be posted, such as medical information, your or anyone
else's Social Security number, or confidential business information,
such as a manufacturing process. Please note that if you include your
name, contact information, or other information that identifies you in
the body of your comments, that information will be posted on https://www.regulations.gov.
     If you want to submit a comment with confidential
information that you do not wish to be made available to the public,
submit the comment as a written/paper submission and in the manner
detailed (see ``Written/Paper Submissions'' and ``Instructions'').

Written/Paper Submissions

    Submit written/paper submissions as follows:
     Mail/Hand Delivery/Courier (for written/paper
submissions): Dockets Management Staff (HFA-305), Food and Drug
Administration, 5630 Fishers Lane, Rm. 1061, Rockville, MD 20852.
     For written/paper comments submitted to the Dockets
Management Staff, FDA will post your comment, as well as any
attachments, except for information submitted, marked and identified,
as confidential, if submitted as detailed in ``Instructions.''

    Instructions: All submissions received must include the Docket No.
FDA-2010-N-0583 for ``Radioactive Drug Research Committees.'' Received
comments, those filed in a timely manner (see ADDRESSES), will be
placed in the docket and, except for those submitted as ``Confidential
Submissions,'' publicly viewable at https://www.regulations.gov or at
the Dockets Management Staff between 9 a.m. and 4 p.m., Monday through
Friday.
     Confidential Submissions--To submit a comment with
confidential information that you do not wish to be made publicly
available, submit your comments only as a written/paper submission. You
should submit two copies total. One copy will include the information
you claim to be confidential with a heading or cover note that states
``THIS DOCUMENT CONTAINS CONFIDENTIAL INFORMATION.'' The Agency will
review this copy, including the claimed confidential information, in
its consideration of comments. The second copy, which will have the
claimed confidential information redacted/blacked out, will be
available for public viewing and posted on https://www.regulations.gov.
Submit both copies to the Dockets Management Staff. If you do not wish
your name and contact information to be made publicly available, you
can provide this information on the cover sheet and not in the body of
your comments and you must identify this information as
``confidential.'' Any information marked as ``confidential'' will not
be disclosed except in accordance with 21 CFR 10.20 and other
applicable disclosure law. For more information about FDA's posting of
comments to public dockets, see 80 FR 56469, September 18, 2015, or
access the information at: https://www.govinfo.gov/content/pkg/FR-2015-09-18/pdf/2015-23389.pdf.
    Docket: For access to the docket to read background documents or
the electronic and written/paper comments received, go to https://www.regulations.gov and insert the docket number, found in brackets in
the heading of this document, into the ``Search'' box and follow the
prompts and/or go to the Dockets Management Staff, 5630 Fishers Lane,
Rm. 1061, Rockville, MD 20852.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Domini Bean, Office of Operations,
Food and Drug Administration, Three White Flint North, 10A-12M, 11601
Landsdown St., North Bethesda, MD 20852,<PHONE_NUMBER>,
<EMAIL_ADDRESS>
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Under the PRA (44 U.S.C. 3501-3521), Federal
Agencies must obtain approval from the Office of Management and Budget
(OMB) for each collection of information they conduct or sponsor.
``Collection of information'' is defined in 44 U.S.C. 3502(3) and 5 CFR
1320.3(c) and includes Agency requests or requirements that members of
the public submit reports, keep records, or provide information to a
third party. Section 3506(c)(2)(A) of the PRA (44 U.S.C. 3506(c)(2)(A))
requires Federal Agencies to provide a 60-day notice in the Federal
Register concerning each proposed collection of information, including
each proposed extension of an existing collection of information,
before submitting the collection to OMB for approval. To comply with
this requirement, FDA is publishing notice of the proposed collection
of information set forth in this document.
    With respect to the following collection of information, FDA
invites comments on these topics: (1) Whether the proposed collection
of information is necessary for the proper performance of FDA's
functions, including whether the information will have practical
utility; (2) the accuracy of FDA's estimate of the burden of the
proposed collection of information, including the validity of the
methodology and assumptions used; (3) ways to enhance the quality,
utility, and clarity of the information to be collected; and (4) ways
to minimize the burden of the collection of information on respondents,
including through the use of automated collection techniques, when
appropriate, and other forms of information technology.

Radioactive Drug Research Committees--21 CFR 361.1

OMB Control Number 0910-0053--Extension

    Under sections 201, 505, and 701 of the Federal Food, Drug, and
Cosmetic Act (21 U.S.C. 321, 355, and 371), FDA has the authority to
issue regulations governing the use of radioactive drugs for basic
scientific research. This information collection request supports those
regulations. Specifically, section 361.1 (21 CFR 361.1) sets forth
specific regulations about establishing and composing radioactive drug
research committees (RDRCs) and their role in approving and monitoring
basic research studies using radiopharmaceuticals. No basic research
study involving any administration of a radioactive drug to research
subjects is permitted without the authorization of an FDA-approved RDRC
(Sec.  361.1(d)(7)). The type of research that may be undertaken with a
radiopharmaceutical drug must be intended to obtain basic information
and not to carry out a clinical trial for safety or efficacy. The types
of basic research permitted are specified in the regulations and
include studies of metabolism, human physiology, pathophysiology, or
biochemistry.
    Section 361.1(c)(2) requires that each RDRC will select a chairman,
who will sign all applications, minutes, and reports of the committee.
Each committee will meet at least once each quarter in which research
activity has been authorized or conducted. Minutes will be kept and
will include the numerical results of votes on protocols involving use
in human subjects. Under Sec.  361.1(c)(3), each RDRC will submit an
annual report to FDA. The annual report will include the names and
qualifications of the members of and of any consultants used by the
RDRC, using Form FDA 2914. The annual report will also include a
summary of each study conducted during the preceding year, using Form
FDA 2915.
    Under Sec.  361.1(d)(5), each investigator will obtain the proper
consent required under the regulations. Each female research subject of
childbearing potential must state in writing that she is not pregnant
or, based on a pregnancy test, be confirmed as not pregnant.
    Under Sec.  361.1(d)(8), the investigator will immediately report
to the RDRC all adverse effects associated with use of the drug, and
the committee will then report to FDA all adverse reactions probably
attributed to the use of the radioactive drug.
    Section 361.1(f) sets forth labeling requirements for radioactive
drugs. These requirements are not in the reporting burden estimate
because they are information supplied by the Federal Government to the
recipient for the purposes of disclosure to the public (5 CFR
1320.3(c)(2)).
    Types of research studies not permitted under the regulations are
also specified and include those intended for immediate therapeutic,
diagnostic, or similar purposes or to determine the safety or
effectiveness of the drug in humans for such purposes (i.e., to carry
out a clinical trial for safety or efficacy). These studies require
filing of an investigational new drug application under 21 CFR part
312, and the associated information collections are covered in OMB
control number 0910-0014.
    The primary purpose of this collection of information is to
determine whether the research studies are being conducted in
accordance with required

regulations and that human subject safety is assured. If these studies
were not reviewed, human subjects could be subjected to inappropriate
radiation or pharmacologic risks. Respondents to this information
collection are the chairperson or chairpersons of each individual RDRC,
investigators, and participants in the studies. The burden estimates
are based on our experience with these reporting and recordkeeping
requirements and the number of submissions we received under the
regulations over the past 3 years.
    We estimate the burden of this collection of information as
follows:

                                                   Table 1--Estimated Annual Reporting Burden \1\ \2\
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
                                                                     Number of
     21 CFR Section and applicable form           Number of        responses per       Total annual     Average burden  per response      Total hours
                                                 respondents         respondent         responses
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Sec.   361.1(c)(3) reports and (c)(4)                        62                  1                 62  1.............................                 62
 approval (Form FDA 2914: Membership
 Summary) \3\.
Sec.   361.1(c)(3) reports (Form FDA 2915:                   40                 10                434  3.5 (3 hours, 30 minutes).....              1,519
 Study Summary) \4\.
Sec.   361.1(d)(8) adverse events...........                 10                  1                 10  .5 (30 minutes)...............                  5
                                             ---------------------------------------------------------                                ------------------
    Total...................................  .................  .................                506  ..............................              1,586
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
\1\ There are no capital costs or operating and maintenance costs associated with this collection of information.
\2\ Numbers may not sum due to rounding.
\3\ https://www.fda.gov/downloads/AboutFDA/ReportsManualsForms/Forms/UCM094979.pdf.
\4\ https://www.fda.gov/downloads/AboutFDA/ReportsManualsForms/Forms/UCM074720.pdf.

                                                 Table 2--Estimated Annual Recordkeeping Burden \1\ \2\
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
                                                                     Number of
               21 CFR Section                     Number of         records per        Total annual          Average burden  per          Total hours
                                                recordkeepers      recordkeepers         records                recordkeeping
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Sec.   361.1(c)(2) RDRC.....................                 62                  4                248  10............................              2,480
Sec.   361.1(d)(5) human research subjects..                 40                 10                434  .75 (45 minutes)..............                326
                                             ---------------------------------------------------------                                ------------------
    Total...................................  .................  .................                682  ..............................              2,806
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
\1\ There are no capital costs or operating and maintenance costs associated with this collection of information.
\2\ Numbers may not sum due to rounding.

    We have adjusted our estimate for the information collection to
reflect an annual decrease of 525 hours and 147 responses since last
OMB review. This adjustment corresponds to fewer submissions we have
received under the information collection over the last few years.

    Dated: January 14, 2020.
Lowell J. Schiller,
Principal Associate Commissioner for Policy.
[FR Doc. 2020-00873 Filed 1-17-20; 8:45 am]
 BILLING CODE 4164-01-P


[Federal Register Volume 80, Number 63 (Thursday, April 2, 2015)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Pages 17703-17706]
[FR Doc No: 2015-07474]

=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY

40 CFR Part 300

[EPA-HQ-SFUND-2014-0620; FRL-9924-66-OSWER]
RIN 2050-AG76

National Oil and Hazardous Substances Pollution Contingency Plan
(NCP); Amending the NCP for Public Notices for Specific Superfund
Activities

AGENCY: Environmental Protection Agency (EPA).

ACTION: Final rule.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Environmental Protection Agency (EPA or the Agency) is
adding language to the National Oil and Hazardous Substances Pollution
Contingency Plan (NCP) to broaden the methods by which the EPA can
notify the public about certain Superfund activities.

DATES: This final rule is effective on May 4, 2015.

ADDRESSES: EPA has established a docket for this action under Docket ID
No. EPA-HQ-SFUND-2014-0620. All documents in the docket are listed in
the www.regulations.gov index. Although listed in the index, some
information is not publicly available, e.g., Confidential Business
Information (CBI) or other information whose disclosure is restricted
by statute. Certain other material, such as copyrighted material, will
be publicly available only in hard copy. Publicly available docket
materials are available either electronically in www.regulations.gov or
in hard copy at the Superfund Docket (Docket ID No. EPA-HQ-SFUND-2014-
0620). This Docket Facility is open from 8:30 a.m. to 4:30 p.m., Monday
through Friday, excluding legal holidays. The telephone number for the
Reading Room is<PHONE_NUMBER> and the telephone number for the
Superfund Docket is<PHONE_NUMBER>. The EPA Docket Center (EPA/DC) is
located at WJC West Building, Room 3334, 1301 Constitution Ave. NW.,
Washington, DC.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
    General Information: Superfund, Toxics Release Inventory (TRI),
Emergency Planning and Community Right-to-Know Act (EPCRA), Risk
Management Program (RMP) and Oil Information Center at<PHONE_NUMBER>
or TDD<PHONE_NUMBER> (hearing impaired). In the Washington, DC
metropolitan area, call<PHONE_NUMBER> or TDD<PHONE_NUMBER>.

    Technical information: Suzanne Wells at<PHONE_NUMBER>,
(wells.suzanne@epa.gov), U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, 1200
Pennsylvania Avenue NW., Washington, DC 20460-0002, Mail Code 5204P.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

I. Why is EPA publishing this final rule?

    On October 1, 2014, EPA published a proposed rule entitled National
Oil and Hazardous Substances Pollution Contingency Plan (NCP); Amending
the NCP for Public Notices for Specific Superfund Activities (79 FR
59179) (hereafter the proposed rule). The EPA proposed to amend the NCP
to expand the methods by which the EPA can notify the public about
certain Superfund activities.
    The NCP requires the lead Agency to publish a notice ``in a major
local newspaper of general circulation'' when certain Superfund site-
related activities occur. Many of these requirements were established
in 1990 or earlier versions of the NCP when it was common practice for
government agencies to publish notices of planned actions in
newspapers. Today, multiple ways are used to notify the public about
Superfund site-related activities that may be as or more effective than
publishing notices in newspapers. For example, the public may be
notified of certain actions the lead agency takes by distributing
flyers door-to-door, mailing notices to homes, sending email
notifications, making telephone calls or posting on Web sites. In
certain cases, publishing a notice in a major newspaper of general
circulation may not be the most effective way of notifying a community
about a specific Superfund action, and may be less cost effective than
other notification methods. EPA received seven comments on the proposed
rule. EPA is addressing the comments and finalizing the amendment.

II. Background

A. What does this amendment do?

    In the October 1, 2014, proposed rule, six sections of the NCP were
proposed to be amended to change the public notice language in the NCP
to allow adequate notice to a community via a major local newspaper of
general circulation or by using one or more other mechanisms.
Specifically, this amendment will add language to:
    [cir] Sec.  300.415(n)(2)(i) That requires a notice of the
availability of the administrative record file for CERCLA actions
where, based on a site evaluation, the lead agency determines that a
removal action is appropriate, and that less than six months exists
before on-site removal action must begin.
    [cir] Sec.  300.415(n)(4)(ii) that requires notification of the
engineering evaluation/cost analysis (EE/CA) where the lead agency
determines that a CERCLA removal action is appropriate and that a
planning period of at least six months exists prior to initiation of
the on-site removal activities.
    [cir] Sec.  300.425(e)(4)(ii) that requires notification of
releases that may be deleted from the National Priorities List (NPL).
    [cir] Sec.  300.815(a) that requires notification of the
availability of the administrative record file for the selection of a
remedial action at the commencement of the remedial investigation.
    [cir] Sec.  300.820(a)(1) that requires notification of the
availability of the administrative record file when an EE/CA is made
available for public comment, if the lead agency determines that a
removal action is appropriate and that a planning period of at least
six months exists before on-site removal activities must be initiated.
    [cir] Sec.  300.820(b)(1) that requires notification of the
availability of the administrative record file for all other removal
actions not included in Sec.  300.820(a).

B. What comments did EPA receive and how are they addressed?

    EPA received seven comments on the proposed rule. Four of the
commenters fully supported the proposed rule to add language to the NCP
to broaden the methods by which the EPA can notify the public about
certain Superfund activities. One commenter wrote ``It is difficult
even for organized groups to constantly scan the local newspaper for
publication notices. To have our rights for participation denied
because we do not have time to peruse the local newspaper each and
every day seems contrary to EPA's mission to inform and protect the
public.'' Another commenter wrote ``The currently required method of
publishing notices in `major local newspapers of general circulation'
is antiquated and frequently ineffective. By broadening the permitted
methods of notification, linked when possible to Community Involvement
Plans, EPA can better reach populations affected by the Superfund
process.'' A third commenter wrote ``The proposed rule would broaden
the notification methods the lead agency will be able to use in order
to adopt a notification approach that is most effective at informing a
community. . . . We fully support an expanded approach to notification
that might include door to door flyers, mailing notices to homes,
sending emails or making telephone calls.''
    One commenter questioned why the proposed rule did not extend
additional methods of public notification to the activities included
under:
    (1) section 117 of the Comprehensive Environmental Response,
Compensation and Liability Act (CERCLA) including:
    [cir] Section 117(a) notification of the proposed plan (40 CFR
300.430(f)(3)(i)(A)),
    [cir] Section 117(b) notification of the final remedial action plan
adopted (40 CFR 300.430(f)(6)(i)), and
    [cir] Section 117(c) notification of an explanation of significant
differences after adoption of a final remedial action plan (40 CFR
300.435(c)(2)(i)(B));
    (2) notice of availability of the amended Record of Decision (40
CFR 300.435(c)(2)(ii)(G));
    (3) notices after EPA receives a letter of intent to apply for
Technical Assistance Grant (40 CFR 35.4110); and
    (4) notices of the starts and completions of five-year reviews or
availability of draft or final five-year review reports.
    EPA is required to follow the statutory public notice requirements
associated with CERCLA section 117. Publication in a major local
newspaper of general circulation will continue to be required for 1)
notice of availability of the proposed plan (40 CFR
300.430(f)(3)(i)(A)), 2) notice of availability of the Record of
Decision (40 CFR 300.430(f)(6)(i)), 3) notice that briefly summarizes
the explanation of significant differences (40 CFR
300.435(c)(2)(i)(B)), 4) notice of availability and a brief description
of the proposed amendment to the Record of Decision (40 CFR
300.435(c)(2)(ii)(A)), and 5) notice of availability of the amended
Record of Decision (40 CFR 300.435(c)(2)(ii)(G)).
    EPA did not propose revisions to 40 CFR 35.4110 that requires the
Agency to publish a notice in a major local newspaper of general
circulation when it receives a letter of intent to apply for a
Technical Assistance Grant (TAG). EPA will consider whether revisions
to 40 CFR 35.4110 are necessary to expand the methods by which it
notifies the public of the receipt of a letter of intent to apply for a
TAG. If EPA decides revisions are necessary, a proposed rule will be
published.
    Finally, there are no regulatory requirements to publish a notice
in a major local newspaper of general circulation about the start and
completion of a five-year review or the availability of a draft or
final five-year review report. The Comprehensive Five-

Year Review Guidance (EPA 540-R-01-007, OSWER No. 9355.7-03B-P, June
2001) says ``[a]t a minimum, community involvement activities during
the five-year review should include notifying the community that the
five-year review will be conducted and notifying the community when the
five-year review is completed.'' The Comprehensive Five-Year Review
Guidance goes on to say the site team should determine the best means
for notifying the community about the five-year review. Therefore, no
revisions are necessary regarding public notification of the start and
completion of five-year reviews or availability of draft or final five-
year review reports.
    One commenter suggested that while it need not be included in the
new NCP language, EPA staff responsible for public notification should
continuously evaluate the effectiveness of the public notice vehicles
they use because ``[i]n this world of new media the best way to reach
people varies by group and is continuously changing.'' The Agency
agrees it is important to receive feedback from the community on a
regular basis on the best ways to communicate with them. During the
interviews conducted with community members as part of the development
of a Community Involvement Plan, EPA staff receive feedback on the best
methods to communicate with the public. EPA staff also take advantage
of opportunities at public meetings and through informal ongoing
discussions with community members about the ways they would like to
receive information about site activities. Based on this feedback, the
Agency adjusts its notification methods, if necessary.
    Two commenters wrote the Agency ought to provide public
notifications in English and in other prominent languages spoken in a
community. The Agency agrees with these commenters. In communities
where languages other than English are spoken, the Agency does seek to
translate site-related information into the languages spoken in the
communities. When appropriate, the Agency can provide translators at
public meetings to communicate site-related information to community
members who do not speak English. Some Agency staff are bilingual and
are able to help communicate site-related information in prominent
languages spoken in a community.
    One commenter wrote that some communities are not knowledgeable
about the Superfund process, and that it is important to provide
training for community members in order to help them understand the
Superfund process, and how they can be involved in the process. The
Agency agrees with this commenter. EPA staff frequently provide
presentations in communities about the Superfund process and how
community members can be involved in the process. In addition, through
programs like Technical Assistance Services for Communities (TASC), EPA
works closely with communities to make sure they have the technical
help they need. Sometimes, a community may need additional help to
fully understand local environmental issues and participate in
decision-making. The purpose of the TASC program is to meet this need.
    Finally, one commenter supported continuing to publish notices in
major local newspapers because some communities continue to rely on
local newspapers to get their information. This final rule allows the
Agency to publish notices in ``major local newspapers of general
circulation,'' if the local newspaper is determined to be the most
effective vehicle for informing a community about certain Superfund
activities.
    Thus, the amendment being promulgated is a useful and important
change that will give the Agency the ability to determine the best
method to notify the public about certain Superfund activities. EPA is
promulgating the change to add language to 40 CFR part 300 as was
proposed.

III. Statutory and Executive Order Reviews

    As explained previously, this rule takes final action on an
amendment for which we received comments in response to our October 1,
2014, National Oil and Hazardous Substances Pollution Contingency Plan
(NCP); Amending the NCP for Public Notices for Specific Superfund
Activities.
    Under Executive Order 12866 (58 FR 51735, October 4, 1993) and
Executive Order 13563 (76 FR 3821, January 21, 2011), this action is
not a ``significant regulatory action'' and is therefore not subject to
OMB review. This action merely adds language to 40 CFR
300.415(n)(2)(i), 300.415(n)(4)(ii), 300.425(e)(4)(ii), 300.815(a),
300.820(a)(1), and 300.820(b)(1) to expand the methods by which the
lead agency can notify the public about certain Superfund activities.
This action will enable the lead agency to identify effective methods
to notify the public. This action does not impose any requirements on
any entity, including small entities. Therefore, pursuant to the
Regulatory Flexibility Act (5 U.S.C. 601 et seq.), after considering
the economic impacts of this action on small entities, EPA certifies
that this action will not have a significant economic impact on a
substantial number of small entities. This action does not contain any
unfunded mandates or significantly or uniquely affect small governments
as described in Sections 202 and 205 of the Unfunded Mandates Reform
Act of 1999 (UMRA) (Pub. L. 104-4). This action does not create new
binding legal requirements that substantially and directly affect
Tribes under Executive Order 13175 (63 FR 67249, November 9, 2000).
This action does not have significant Federalism implications under
Executive Order 13132 (64 FR 43255, August 10, 1999). Because this
action has been exempted from review under Executive Order 12866, this
final rule is not subject to Executive Order 13211, entitled Actions
Concerning Regulations That Significantly Affect Energy Supply,
Distribution, or Use (66 FR 28355, May 22, 2001) or Executive Order
13045, entitled Protection of Children from Environmental Health Risks
and Safety Risks (62 FR 19885, April 23, 1997). This action does not
contain any information collections subject to OMB approval under the
Paperwork Reduction Act (PRA), 44 U.S.C. 3501 et seq., nor does it
require any special considerations under Executive Order 12898,
entitled Federal Actions to Address Environmental Justice in Minority
Populations and Low-Income Populations (59 FR 7629, February 16, 1994).
This action does not involve technical standards; thus, the
requirements of Section 12(d) of the National Technology Transfer and
Advancement Act of 1995 (15 U.S.C. 272) do not apply.

List of Subjects in 40 CFR Part 300

    Environmental protection, Air pollution control, Chemicals,
Hazardous substances, Hazardous waste, Intergovernmental relations,
Penalties, Reporting and recordkeeping requirements, Superfund, Water
pollution control, Water supply.

    Dated: March 19, 2015.
Mathy Stanislaus,
Assistant Administrator, Office of Solid Waste and Emergency Response.

    For the reasons set out above, title 40, chapter I of the Code of
Federal Regulations is amended as follows:

PART 300--NATIONAL OIL AND HAZARDOUS SUBSTANCES POLLUTION
CONTINGENCY PLAN

0
1. The authority citation for part 300 is revised to read as follows:

    Authority:  33 U.S.C. 1321(d); 42 U.S.C. 9601-9657; E.O. 13626,
77 FR 56749, 3CFR,

2013 Comp., p. 306; E.O. 12777, 56 FR 54757, 3 CFR, 1991 Comp., p.
351; E.O. 12580, 52 FR 2923, 3 CFR, 1987 Comp., p. 193.

0
2. Section 300.415 is amended by revising paragraphs (n)(2)(i) and
(n)(4)(ii) to read as follows:

Sec.  300.415  Removal action.

* * * * *
    (n) * * *
    (2) * * *
    (i) Publish a notice of availability of the administrative record
file established pursuant to Sec.  300.820 in a major local newspaper
of general circulation or use one or more other mechanisms to give
adequate notice to a community within 60 days of initiation of on-site
removal activity;
* * * * *
    (4) * * *
    (ii) Publish a notice of availability and brief description of the
EE/CA in a major local newspaper of general circulation or use one or
more other mechanisms to give adequate notice to a community pursuant
to Sec.  300.820;
* * * * *

0
3. Section 300.425 is amended by revising paragraph (e)(4)(ii) to read
as follows:

Sec.  300.425  Establishing remedial priorities.

* * * * *
    (e) * * *
    (4) * * *
    (ii) In a major local newspaper of general circulation at or near
the release that is proposed for deletion, publish a notice of
availability or use one or more other mechanisms to give adequate
notice to a community of the intent to delete;
* * * * *

0
4. Section 300.815 is amended by revising paragraph (a) to read as
follows:

Sec.  300.815  Administrative record file for a remedial action.

    (a) The administrative record file for the selection of a remedial
action shall be made available for public inspection at the
commencement of the remedial investigation phase. At such time, the
lead agency shall publish in a major local newspaper of general
circulation a notice or use one or more other mechanisms to give
adequate notice to a community of the availability of the
administrative record file.
* * * * *

0
5. Section 300.820 is amended by revising paragraphs (a)(1) and (b)(1)
to read as follows:

Sec.  300.820  Administrative record file for a removal action.

    (a) * * *
    (1) The administrative record file shall be made available for
public inspection when the engineering evaluation/cost analysis (EE/CA)
is made available for public comment. At such time, the lead agency
shall publish in a major local newspaper of general circulation a
notice or use one or more other mechanisms to give adequate notice to a
community of the availability of the administrative record file.
* * * * *
    (b) * * *
    (1) Documents included in the administrative record file shall be
made available for public inspection no later than 60 days after
initiation of on-site removal activity. At such time, the lead agency
shall publish in a major local newspaper of general circulation a
notice or use one or more other mechanisms to give adequate notice to a
community of the availability of the administrative record file.
* * * * *
[FR Doc. 2015-07474 Filed 4-1-15; 8:45 am]
 BILLING CODE 6560-50-P


[Federal Register: December 15, 2005 (Volume 70, Number 240)]
[Notices]
[Page 74382]
[DOCID:fr15de05-100]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

Sunshine Act Meeting

Federal Register Citation of Previous Announcement:  [70 FR 72318,
December 2, 2005].

Status: Closed meeting.

Place: 100 F Street, NE., Washington, DC.

Announcement of Additional Meeting: Additional meeting.
    An additional closed meeting has been scheduled for Tuesday,
December 13, 2005 at 11:45 a.m.
    Commissioners and certain staff members who have an interest in the
matter will attend the closed meeting.
    The General Counsel of the Commission, or his designee, has
certified that, in his opinion, one or more of the exemptions set forth
in 5 U.S.C. 552b(c)(5), (7), (9)(B) and (10) and 17 CFR 200.402(a)(5),
(7), 9(ii) and (10) permit consideration of the scheduled matter at the
closed meeting.
    Commissioner Campos, as duty officer, voted to consider the item
listed for the closed meeting in closed session and that no earlier
notice thereof was possible.
    The subject matter of the closed meeting scheduled for Tuesday,
December 13, 2005 will be: Institution and settlement of injunctive
actions.
    At times, changes in Commission priorities require alterations in
the scheduling of meeting items. For further information and to
ascertain what, if any, matters have been added, deleted or postponed,
please contact:

    The Office of the Secretary at<PHONE_NUMBER>.
    Dated: December 12, 2005.

Jonathan G. Katz,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. 05-24134 Filed 12-13-05; 11:09 am]

BILLING CODE 8010-01-P


EPA REGISTRATION DIVISION COMPANY NOTICE OF FILING FOR PESTICIDE PETITIONS PUBLISHED IN THE FEDERAL REGISTER

EPA Registration Division contact: [PV Shah,  (CITAB)<PHONE_NUMBER>]
Oxiteno USA, LLC
IN-11046

	EPA has received a pesticide petition (IN-11046) from Spring Trading Company (203 Dogwood Trail, Magnolia, TX 77354) on behalf of Oxiteno USA, LLC, (9801 Bay Area Blvd., Pasadena, Texas 77507) proposing, pursuant to section 408(d) of the Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act (FFDCA), 21 U.S.C. 346a(d), to amend 40 CFR part 180.  To amend the exemption from the requirement of a tolerance for 1-Octanamine, N,N-dimethyl-, N-oxide CAS No. 2605-78-9 in or on the raw agricultural commodity growing crops at 40 CFR 180.910.  EPA has determined that the petition contains data or information regarding the elements set forth in section 408 (d)(2) of  FDDCA; however, EPA has not fully evaluated the sufficiency of the submitted data at this time or whether the data supports granting of the petition. Additional data may be needed before EPA rules on the petition.

 Residue Chemistry

	1. Analytical method.  An analytical method is not required for enforcement purposes since the request is for an exemption from the requirement of a tolerance without any numerical limitation.

	2. Magnitude of residues. Oxiteno USA, LLC is petitioning the agency to establish an exemption from the requirement of a tolerance.  Therefore information regarding the nature and magnitude of chemical residues resulting from the use of this inert ingredient is not required.

 Toxicological Profile

EPA has evaluated the available toxicity data and considered its validity, completeness, and reliability as well as the relationship of the results of the studies to human risk. EPA has also considered available information concerning the variability of the sensitivities of major identifiable subgroups of consumers, including infants and children.
	1. Acute toxicity.  An acute oral toxicity study in rats is available on octyldimethylamine oxide as well as dermal and eye irritation and dermal sensitization studies.  Octyldimethylamine oxide was not acutely toxic by the oral route (LD50 >5000 mg/kg), was a severe eye irritant and a moderate skin irritant and was not dermal sensitizer.
	2. Genotoxicty. Octyldimethylamine oxide (82.3% purity[1]) was tested for its potential to induce chromosomal aberrations in human lymphocytes in the presence and absence of metabolic activation.  Concentrations evaluated were 0, 432, 865 and 1730 ug/mL.  Octyldimethylamine oxide did not induce a positive response in either experiment in the presence or absence of metabolic activation and was concluded to be negative for inducing chromosomal aberrations in human lymphocytes.  The positive controls produced the expected response
Four genotoxicity studies were located on dodecyl dimethylamine oxide.  These studies includes two Ames Salmonella assays, a cell transformation assay and a rat dominant lethal study.  All studies were negative.
	3. Reproductive and developmental toxicity. Studies available on dodecyl dimethylamine oxide were a 2-generation rat reproduction study and rat and rabbit developmental toxicity studies.  No reproductive toxicity was observed in the rat and no developmental toxicity in the rabbit developmental toxicity study.  In the rat study, developmental toxicity was observed only in the presence of maternal toxicity.
	4. Subchronic toxicity. A 90-day (gavage) toxicity study is available on octyldimethylamine oxide in Sprague-Dawley rats.  The NOAEL was considered to be 150 mg/kg/day based on decreases in body weight and food consumption, mortality, clinical signs of toxicity, decreased motor activity, histopathology of the kidney and spleen and effects on hematology and clinical chemistry parameters observed at 750 mg/kg/day.
	5. Chronic toxicity. There is no evidence that 1-Octanamine, N,N-dimethyl-, N-oxide is carcinogenic. In addition, there was little concern about any of the postulated metabolites having greater toxicity than the parent compounds.
	6. Endocrine disruption. 1-Octanamine, N,N-dimethyl-, N-oxide is not considered an endocrine disruptor.   As the Agency proceeds with implementation of this program, further testing of products containing 1-Octanamine, N,N-dimethyl-, N-oxide for endocrine effects may be required.
C. Aggregate Exposure
	1. Dietary exposure. In examining aggregate exposure, section 408 of the FFDCA directs EPA to consider available information concerning exposures from the pesticide residue in food and all other non-occupational exposures, including drinking water from ground water or surface water and exposure through pesticide use in gardens, lawns, or buildings (residential and other indoor uses).
	EPA establishes exemptions from the requirement of a tolerance only in those cases where it can be demonstrated that the risks from aggregate exposure to pesticide chemical residues under reasonably foreseeable circumstances will pose no appreciable risks to human health. In order to determine the risks from aggregate exposure to pesticide inert ingredients, the Agency considers the toxicity of the inert in conjunction with possible exposure to residues of the inert ingredient through food, drinking water, and through other exposures that occur as a result of pesticide use in residential settings. If EPA is able to determine that a finite tolerance is not necessary to ensure that there is a reasonable certainty that no harm will result from aggregate exposure to the inert ingredient, an exemption from the requirement of a tolerance may be established.
	1-Octanamine, N,N-dimethyl-, N-oxide is used as inert ingredients in pesticide products that are currently registered for uses that could result in intermediate-term residential exposure and the Agency has determined that it is appropriate to aggregate chronic exposure through food and water with intermediate-term residential exposures to 1-Octanamine, N,N-dimethyl-, N-oxide.  Adult residential exposure includes high-end post application dermal exposure from contact with treated pets. The potential MOEs are not of concern.
D. Cumulative Effects
	We have not found a common mechanism of toxicity finding as to 1-Octanamine, N,N-dimethyl-, N-oxide and any other substances. 1-Octanamine, N,N-dimethyl-, N-oxide does not appear to produce a toxic metabolite.  For the purposes of this requested tolerance action 1-Octanamine, N,N-dimethyl-, N-oxide does not have a common mechanism of toxicity with other substances.

E. Safety Determination
	1. U.S. population. Based on these risk assessments, EPA concludes that there is a reasonable certainty that no harm will result to the general population or to infants and children from aggregate exposure to residues of 1-Octanamine, N,N-dimethyl-, N-oxide.
	2. Infants and children. Based on these risk assessments, EPA concludes that there is a reasonable certainty that no harm will result to the general population or to infants and children from aggregate exposure from residues of 1-Octanamine, N,N-dimethyl-, N-oxide
F. International Tolerances
	Oxiteno USA, LLC, is not aware of any country requiring a tolerance for 1-Octanamine, N,N-dimethyl-, N-oxide nor have any CODEX Maximum Residue Levels been established for any food crops at this time.


[Federal Register Volume 81, Number 75 (Tuesday, April 19, 2016)]
[Notices]
[Pages 22975-22976]
[FR Doc No: 2016-08966]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission

Supplemental Notice of Technical Conference

Review of Generator Interconnection      Docket No. RM16-12-000.
 Agreements and Procedures.
American Wind Energy Association.......  Docket No. RM15-21-000.

    As announced in the Notice of Technical Conference issued on March
29, 2016 in the above-captioned proceedings,\1\ Federal Energy
Regulatory Commission (Commission) staff will hold a technical
conference on May 13, 2016 to discuss select issues related to a
petition for rulemaking submitted by the American Wind Energy
Association (Docket No. RM15-21-000).\2\ In addition, the conference
will explore other generator interconnection issues, including
interconnection of electric storage resources. The conference will be
held from 9:30 a.m. to 4:30 p.m. (EDT) in the Commission Meeting Room
at Commission headquarters, 888 First Street NE., Washington, DC 20426.
Members of the Commission may attend the conference, which will also be
open for the public to attend. Advance registration is not required,
but is

encouraged. Attendees may register at the following Web page: https://www.ferc.gov/whats-new/registration/05-13-16-form.asp.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \1\ Review of Generator Interconnection Agreements and
Procedures, Docket Nos. RM16-12-000 and American Wind Energy
Association, Docket No. RM15-21-000 (Mar. 29, 2016) (Notice of
Technical Conference).
    \2\ The comments filed in Docket No. RM15-21-000 will be
incorporated into Docket No. RM16-12-000.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

1.
    Attached to this supplemental notice is a list of interconnection
queue topics considered for discussion at the technical conference.
Questions that speakers should be prepared to discuss are grouped by
topic below. Please note that this organization does not necessarily
reflect the individual panels that will take place at the technical
conference. A final agenda will be provided in a subsequent
supplemental notice of technical conference. Those interested in
speaking at the technical conference should notify the Commission by
April 20, 2016, by completing the online form at the following Web
page: https://www.ferc.gov/whats-new/registration/05-13-16-speaker-form.asp. On this form, speakers can provide biographical information
and indicate preferred topics to address. Due to time constraints, it
may not be possible to accommodate all those interested in speaking.
Selected speakers will be notified as soon as possible.
    Discussions at the conference may involve issues raised in
proceedings that are currently pending before the Commission. These
proceedings include, but are not limited to:
    E.ON Climate & Renewables North America LLC, Pioneer Trail Wind
Farm, LLC, Settlers Trail Wind Farm, LLC v. Northern Indiana Public
Service Company, Docket No. EL14-66-002;
    Entergy Arkansas, Inc., Docket No. ER14-671-000;
    Internal MISO Generators v. Midcontinent Independent System
Operator, Inc., Docket No. EL15-99-000;
    Midcontinent Independent System Operator, Inc., Docket No. ER16-
675-000;
    California Independent System Operator Corporation, Docket No.
ER16-693-000;
    ISO New England, Inc., Docket No. ER16-946-000;
    Midcontinent Independent System Operator, Inc., Docket No. ER16-
1120-000; and
    Midcontinent Independent System Operator, Inc., Docket No. ER16-
1211-000.
    The conference will be transcribed and webcast. A link to the
webcast of this event will be available in the Commission Calendar of
Events at http://www.ferc.gov. Transcripts of the technical conference
will be available for a fee from Ace-Reporting<PHONE_NUMBER>). The
Capitol Connection provides technical support for the webcasts and
offers the option of listening to the conferences via phone-bridge for
a fee. For additional information, visit www.CapitolConnection.org or
call<PHONE_NUMBER>.
    Commission conferences are accessible under section 508 of the
Rehabilitation Act of 1973. For accessibility accommodations, please
send an email to<EMAIL_ADDRESS>or call toll free (866) 208-
3372 (voice) or<PHONE_NUMBER> (TTY), or send a FAX to<PHONE_NUMBER>
with the required accommodations.
    For more information about the technical conference, please contact
Tony Dobbins<EMAIL_ADDRESS>202-502-6630) or Adam Pan
<EMAIL_ADDRESS>202-502-6023). For information related to
logistics, please contact Sarah McKinley<EMAIL_ADDRESS>202-
502-8368).

    Dated: April 13, 2016.
Kimberly D. Bose,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2016-08966 Filed 4-18-16; 8:45 am]
 BILLING CODE 6717-01-P


[Federal Register Volume 81, Number 31 (Wednesday, February 17, 2016)]
[Proposed Rules]
[Pages 8026-8027]
[FR Doc No: 2016-03061]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION

Federal Aviation Administration

14 CFR Part 71

[Docket No. FAA-2015-5800; Airspace Docket No. 15-AGL-21]

Proposed Establishment of Class E Airspace; Lisbon, ND

AGENCY: Federal Aviation Administration (FAA), DOT.

ACTION: Notice of proposed rulemaking (NPRM).

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: This action proposes to establish Class E airspace at Lisbon,
ND. Controlled airspace is necessary to accommodate new Standard
Instrument Approach Procedures developed at Lisbon Municipal Airport,
for the safety and management of Instrument Flight Rules (IFR)
operations at the airport.

DATES: Comments must be received on or before April 4, 2016.

ADDRESSES: Send comments on this proposal to the U.S. Department of
Transportation, Docket Operations, M-30, West Building Ground Floor,
Room W12-140, 1200 New Jersey Avenue SE., Washington, DC 20590;
telephone<PHONE_NUMBER>. You must identify FAA Docket No. FAA-2015-
5800; Docket No.15-AGL-21, at the beginning of your comments. You may
also submit comments through the Internet at http://www.regulations.gov. You may review the public docket containing the
proposal, any comments received, and any final disposition in person in
the Dockets Office between 9:00 a.m. and 5:00 p.m., Monday through
Friday, except Federal holidays. The Docket Office (telephone 1-800-
647-5527), is on the ground floor of the building at the above address.
    FAA Order 7400.9Z, Airspace Designations and Reporting Points, and
subsequent amendments can be viewed online at http://www.faa.gov/air_traffic/publications/. For further information, you can contact the
Airspace Policy Group, Federal Aviation Administration, 800
Independence Avenue SW., Washington, DC 29591; telephone:<PHONE_NUMBER>.
The Order is also available for inspection at the National Archives and
Records Administration (NARA). For information on the availability of
FAA order 7400.9Z at NARA, call<PHONE_NUMBER>, or go to http://www.archives.gov/federal_register/code_of_federal-regulations/ibr_locations.html.
    FAA Order 7400.9, Airspace Designations and Reporting Points, is
published yearly and effective on September 15.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Raul Garza, Jr., Central Service
Center, Operations Support Group, Federal Aviation Administration,
Southwest Region, 10101 Hillwood Parkway, Fort Worth, TX 76177;
telephone:<PHONE_NUMBER>.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

Authority for This Rulemaking

    The FAA's authority to issue rules regarding aviation safety is
found in Title 49 of the United States Code. Subtitle I, Section 106
describes the authority of the FAA Administrator. Subtitle VII,
Aviation Programs, describes in more detail the scope of the agency's
authority. This rulemaking is promulgated under the authority described
in Subtitle VII, Part, A, Subpart I, Section 40103. Under that section,
the FAA is charged with prescribing regulations to assign the use of
airspace necessary to ensure the safety of aircraft and the efficient
use of airspace. This regulation is within the scope of that authority
as it would establish Class E airspace at Lisbon Municipal Airport,
Lisbon, ND.

Comments Invited

    Interested parties are invited to participate in this proposed
rulemaking by submitting such written data, views, or arguments, as
they may desire. Comments that provide the factual basis supporting the
views and suggestions presented are particularly helpful in developing
reasoned regulatory decisions on the proposal. Comments are
specifically invited on the overall regulatory, aeronautical, economic,
environmental, and energy-related aspects of the proposal.
Communications should identify both docket numbers and be submitted in
triplicate to the address listed above. Commenters wishing the FAA to
acknowledge receipt of their comments on this notice must submit with
those comments a self-addressed, stamped postcard on which the
following statement is made: ``Comments to Docket No. FAA-2015-5800/
Airspace Docket No. 15-AGL-21.'' The postcard will be date/time stamped
and returned to the commenter.

Availability of NPRMs

    An electronic copy of this document may be downloaded through the
Internet at http://www.regulations.gov. Recently published rulemaking
documents can also be accessed through the FAA's Web page at http://www.faa.gov/airports_airtraffic/air_traffic/publications/airspace_amendments/.

    You may review the public docket containing the proposal, any
comments received and any final disposition in person in the Dockets
Office (see ADDRESSES section for address and phone number) between
9:00 a.m. and 5:00 p.m., Monday through Friday, except Federal
holidays. An informal docket may also be examined during normal
business hours at the Central Service Center, Operation Support Group,
10101 Hillwood Parkway, Fort Worth, TX 76177.
    Persons interested in being placed on a mailing list for future
NPRMs should contact the FAA's Office of Rulemaking<PHONE_NUMBER>, to
request a copy of Advisory Circular No. 11-2A, Notice of Proposed
Rulemaking Distribution System, which describes the application
procedure.

Availability and Summary of Documents Proposed for Incorporation by
Reference

    This document would amend FAA Order 7400.9Z, Airspace Designations
and Reporting Points, dated August 6, 2015, and effective September 15,
2015. FAA Order 7400.9Z is publicly available as listed in the
ADDRESSES section of this document. FAA Order 7400.9Z lists Class A, B,
C, D, and E airspace areas, air traffic service routes, and reporting
points.

The Proposal

    The FAA is proposing an amendment to Title 14, Code of Federal
Regulations (14 CFR), Part 71 by establishing Class E airspace
extending upward from 700 feet above the surface within an 6.5-mile
radius of Lisbon Municipal Airport, Lisbon, ND, to accommodate new
standard instrument approach procedures. Controlled airspace is needed
for the safety and management of IFR operations at the airport.
    Class E airspace designations are published in Section 6005 of FAA
Order 7400.9Z, dated August 6, 2015, and effective September 15, 2015,
which is incorporated by reference in 14 CFR 71.1. The Class E airspace
designation listed in this document will be published subsequently in
the Order.

Regulatory Notices and Analyses

    The FAA has determined that this regulation only involves an
established body of technical regulations for which frequent and
routine amendments are necessary to keep them operationally current, is
non-controversial and unlikely to result in adverse or negative
comments. It, therefore: (1) Is not a ``significant regulatory action''
under Executive Order 12866; (2) is not a ``significant rule'' under
DOT Regulatory Policies and Procedures (44 FR 11034; February 26,
1979); and (3) does not warrant preparation of a regulatory evaluation
as the anticipated impact is so minimal. Since this is a routine matter
that will only affect air traffic procedures and air navigation, it is
certified that this rule, when promulgated, would not have a
significant economic impact on a substantial number of small entities
under the criteria of the Regulatory Flexibility Act.

Environmental Review

    This proposal will be subject to an environmental analysis in
accordance with FAA Order 1050.1F, ``Environmental Impacts: Policies
and Procedures'' prior to any FAA final regulatory action.

List of Subjects in 14 CFR Part 71

    Airspace, Incorporation by reference, Navigation (air).

The Proposed Amendment

    In consideration of the foregoing, the Federal Aviation
Administration proposes to amend 14 CFR part 71 as follows:

PART 71--DESIGNATION OF CLASS A, B, C, D, AND E AIRSPACE AREAS; AIR
TRAFFIC SERVICE ROUTES; AND REPORTING POINTS

0
1. The authority citation for 14 CFR part 71 continues to read as
follows:

     Authority:  49 U.S.C. 106(f), 106(g), 40103, 40113, 40120; E.O.
10854, 24 FR 9565, 3 CFR, 1959-1963 Comp., p. 389.

Sec.  71.1  [Amended]

0
2. The incorporation by reference in 14 CFR 71.1 of FAA Order 7400.9Z,
Airspace Designations and Reporting Points, dated August 6, 2015, and
effective September 15, 2015, is amended as follows:

Section 6005 Class E Airspace Areas Extending Upward From 700 Feet
or More Above the Surface of the Earth.

* * * * *

AGL ND E5 Lisbon, ND [New]

Lisbon Municipal Airport, ND
    (Lat. 46[deg]26'49'' N., long. 097[deg]43'42'' W.)

    That airspace extending upward from 700 feet above the surface
within a 6.5-mile radius of Lisbon Municipal Airport.

    Issued in Fort Worth, TX, on January 22, 2016.
Christopher L. Southerland,
Manager, Operations Support Group, ATO Central Service Center.
[FR Doc. 2016-03061 Filed 2-16-16; 8:45 am]
 BILLING CODE 4910-13-P


[Federal Register Volume 76, Number 231 (Thursday, December 1, 2011)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Pages 74665-74667]
[FR Doc No: 2011-30232]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION

Federal Aviation Administration

14 CFR Part 39

[Docket No. FAA-2011-1256; Directorate Identifier 2011-NM-036-AD;
Amendment 39-16874; AD 2011-24-10]
RIN 2120-AA64

Airworthiness Directives; Bombardier, Inc. Airplanes

AGENCY: Federal Aviation Administration (FAA), Department of
Transportation (DOT).

ACTION: Final rule; request for comments.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: We are adopting a new airworthiness directive (AD) for
Bombardier, Inc. Model DHC-8-201 and -202 airplanes with FAA
Supplemental Type Certificate (STC) ST00753NY (Transport Canada Civil
Aviation (TCCA) STC SA97-106) installed. This AD results from mandatory
continuing airworthiness information (MCAI) originated by an aviation
authority of another country to identify and correct an unsafe
condition on an aviation product. The MCAI describes the unsafe
condition as:

    It has been determined that modifications by DECA Aviation
Engineering Limited on Bombardier Inc. DHC-8 Series * * * 200
aeroplanes with their Cargo Conversion and Abrasion Protection
Systems, Supplemental Type Certificates (STCs) * * * SA97-106,
provide inadequate fire protection and decompression venting means.
This can lead to an uncontrolled cargo fire and structural damage.
* * * * *

    This AD requires actions that are intended to address the unsafe
condition described in the MCAI.

DATES: This AD becomes effective December 16, 2011.
    The Director of the Federal Register approved the incorporation by
reference of a certain publication listed in the AD as of December 16,
2011.
    We must receive comments on this AD by January 17, 2012.

ADDRESSES: You may send comments by any of the following methods:
     Federal eRulemaking Portal: Go to http://www.regulations.gov. Follow the instructions for submitting comments.
     Fax:<PHONE_NUMBER>.
     Mail: U.S. Department of Transportation, Docket
Operations, M-30, West Building Ground Floor, Room W12-140, 1200 New
Jersey Avenue SE., Washington, DC 20590.
     Hand Delivery: U.S. Department of Transportation, Docket
Operations, M-30, West Building Ground Floor, Room W12-140, 1200 New
Jersey Avenue SE., Washington, DC, between 9 a.m. and 5 p.m., Monday
through Friday, except Federal holidays.

Examining the AD Docket

    You may examine the AD docket on the Internet at http://www.regulations.gov; or in person at the Docket Operations office
between 9 a.m. and 5 p.m., Monday through Friday, except Federal
holidays. The AD docket contains this AD, the regulatory evaluation,
any comments received, and other information. The street address for
the Docket Operations office (telephone<PHONE_NUMBER>) is in the
ADDRESSES section. Comments will be available in the AD docket shortly
after receipt.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Luke Walker, Aerospace Engineer,
Airframe and Mechanical Systems Branch, ANE-171, FAA, New York Aircraft
Certification Office (ACO), 1600 Stewart Avenue, Suite 410, Westbury,
New York 11590; phone:<PHONE_NUMBER>; fax:<PHONE_NUMBER>; email:
<EMAIL_ADDRESS>
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

Discussion

    The Transport Canada Civil Aviation (TCCA), which is the aviation
authority for Canada, has issued Canadian Airworthiness Directive CF-
2011-02, dated February 1, 2011 (referred to after this as ``the
MCAI''), to correct an unsafe condition for the specified products. The
MCAI states:

    It has been determined that modifications by DECA Aviation
Engineering Limited on Bombardier Inc. DHC-8 Series * * * 200
aeroplanes with their Cargo Conversion and Abrasion Protection
Systems, Supplemental Type Certificates (STCs) * * * SA97-106,
provide inadequate fire protection and decompression venting means.
This can lead to an uncontrolled cargo fire and structural damage.
    This [TCCA] directive mandates the removal of these Cargo
Conversion and Abrasion Protection Systems.

    You may obtain further information by examining the MCAI in the AD
docket.

Relevant Service Information

    DECA Aviation Engineering Limited has issued Engineer Order EI4394,
Revision 2, dated February 5, 2011. The actions described in this
service information are intended to correct the unsafe condition
identified in the MCAI.

FAA's Determination and Requirements of This AD

    This product has been approved by the aviation authority of another
country, and is approved for operation in the United States. Pursuant
to our bilateral agreement with the State of Design Authority, we have
been notified of the unsafe condition described in the MCAI and service
information referenced above. We are issuing this AD because we
evaluated all pertinent information and determined the unsafe condition
exists and is likely to exist or develop on other products of the same
type design.
    There are no products of this type currently registered in the
United States. However, this rule is necessary to ensure that the
described unsafe condition is addressed if any of these products are
placed on the U.S. Register in the future.

Differences Between the AD and the MCAI or Service Information

    We have reviewed the MCAI and related service information and, in
general, agree with their substance. But we might have found it
necessary to use different words from those in the MCAI to ensure the
AD is clear for U.S. operators and is enforceable. In making these
changes, we do not intend to differ substantively from the information
provided in the MCAI and related service information.
    We might also have required different actions in this AD from those
in the MCAI in order to follow FAA policies. Any such differences are
highlighted in a NOTE within the AD.

FAA's Determination of the Effective Date

    Since there are currently no domestic operators of this product,
notice and opportunity for public comment before issuing this AD are
unnecessary.

Comments Invited

    This AD is a final rule that involves requirements affecting flight
safety, and we did not precede it by notice and opportunity for public
comment. We invite you to send any written relevant data, views, or
arguments about this AD. Send your comments to an address listed under
the ADDRESSES section. Include ``Docket No. FAA-2011-1256; Directorate
Identifier 2011-NM-036-AD'' at the beginning of your comments. We
specifically invite comments on the overall regulatory, economic,
environmental, and energy aspects of this AD. We will consider all
comments received by the closing date and may amend this AD because of
those comments.
    We will post all comments we receive, without change, to http://www.regulations.gov, including any personal information you provide. We

will also post a report summarizing each substantive verbal contact we
receive about this AD.

Authority for This Rulemaking

    Title 49 of the United States Code specifies the FAA's authority to
issue rules on aviation safety. Subtitle I, section 106, describes the
authority of the FAA Administrator. ``Subtitle VII: Aviation
Programs,'' describes in more detail the scope of the Agency's
authority.
    We are issuing this rulemaking under the authority described in
``Subtitle VII, Part A, Subpart III, Section 44701: General
requirements.'' Under that section, Congress charges the FAA with
promoting safe flight of civil aircraft in air commerce by prescribing
regulations for practices, methods, and procedures the Administrator
finds necessary for safety in air commerce. This regulation is within
the scope of that authority because it addresses an unsafe condition
that is likely to exist or develop on products identified in this
rulemaking action.

Regulatory Findings

    We determined that this AD will not have federalism implications
under Executive Order 13132. This AD will not have a substantial direct
effect on the States, on the relationship between the national
government and the States, or on the distribution of power and
responsibilities among the various levels of government.
    For the reasons discussed above, I certify this AD:
    1. Is not a''significant regulatory action'' under Executive Order
12866;
    2. Is not a''significant rule'' under the DOT Regulatory Policies
and Procedures (44 FR 11034, February 26, 1979); and
    3. Will not have a significant economic impact, positive or
negative, on a substantial number of small entities under the criteria
of the Regulatory Flexibility Act.
    We prepared a regulatory evaluation of the estimated costs to
comply with this AD and placed it in the AD docket.

List of Subjects in 14 CFR Part 39

    Air transportation, Aircraft, Aviation safety, Incorporation by
reference, Safety.

Adoption of the Amendment

    Accordingly, under the authority delegated to me by the
Administrator, the FAA amends 14 CFR part 39 as follows:

PART 39--AIRWORTHINESS DIRECTIVES

0
1. The authority citation for part 39 continues to read as follows:

    Authority:  49 U.S.C. 106(g), 40113, 44701.

Sec.  39.13  [Amended]

0
2. The FAA amends Sec.  39.13 by adding the following new AD:

2011-24-10 Bombardier, Inc.: Amendment 39-16874. Docket No. FAA-
2011-1256; Directorate Identifier 2011-NM-036-AD.

Effective Date

    (a) This airworthiness directive (AD) becomes effective December
16, 2011.

Affected ADs

    (b) None.

Applicability

    (c) This AD applies to Bombardier, Inc. Model DHC-8-201, and -
202 airplanes; certificated in any category; serial numbers 003 and
subsequent with FAA Supplemental Type Certificate (STC) ST00753NY
(Transport Canada Civil Aviation (TCCA) STC SA97-106) installed.

Subject

    (d) Air Transport Association (ATA) of America Code 25:
Equipment/Furnishings.

Reason

    (e) The mandatory continued airworthiness information (MCAI)
states:

    It has been determined that modifications by DECA Aviation
Engineering Limited on Bombardier Inc. DHC-8 Series * * * 200
aeroplanes with their Cargo Conversion and Abrasion Protection
Systems, Supplemental Type Certificates (STCs) * * * SA97-106,
provide inadequate fire protection and decompression venting means.
This can lead to an uncontrolled cargo fire and structural damage.
* * * * *

Compliance

    (f) You are responsible for having the actions required by this
AD performed within the compliance times specified, unless the
actions have already been done.

Cargo Conversion System and Combi Abrasion Protection System Removal

    (g) Within 60 days after the effective date of this AD: Remove
the DECA Aviation Engineering Limited Combi Abrasion Protection
System configurations previously installed by using FAA STC
ST00753NY (TCCA STC SA97-106), in accordance with the removal
instructions specified in DECA Engineering Order EI4394, Revision 2,
dated February 5, 2011.

Parts Installation

    (h) As of the effective date of this AD, no person may install
the DECA Aviation Engineering Limited Combi Abrasion Protection
Systems configurations by using FAA STC ST00753NY (TCCA STC SA97-
106), on any airplane.

Credit for Actions Accomplished in Accordance With Previous Service
Information

    (i) Removing the DECA Combi Abrasion Protection System in
accordance with DECA Engineering Order EI4394, Revision 1, dated
January 13, 2011, before the effective date of this AD is acceptable
for compliance with the corresponding removal required by paragraph
(g) of this AD.

FAA AD Differences

    Note 1:  This AD differs from the MCAI and/or service
information as follows: This FAA AD only applies to Model DHC-8
Series 200 airplanes with Supplemental Type Certificate (STC) FAA
ST00753NY (TCCA STC SA97-106) installed. The FAA has not approved
any STC equivalent to Model DHC-8 series 100 TCCA STC SA00-107.

Other FAA AD Provisions

    (j) The following provisions also apply to this AD:
    (1) Alternative Methods of Compliance (AMOCs): The Manager, New
York Aircraft Certification Office (ACO), ANE-170, FAA, has the
authority to approve AMOCs for this AD, if requested using the
procedures found in 14 CFR 39.19. In accordance with 14 CFR 39.19,
send your request to your principal inspector or local Flight
Standards District Office, as appropriate. If sending information
directly to the ACO, send it to ATTN: Program Manager, Continuing
Operational Safety, FAA, New York ACO, 1600 Stewart Avenue Suite
410, Westbury, New York 11590; telephone<PHONE_NUMBER>; fax (516)
794-5531. Before using any approved AMOC, notify your appropriate
principal inspector, or lacking a principal inspector, the manager
of the local flight standards district office/certificate holding
district office. The AMOC approval letter must specifically
reference this AD.
    (2) Airworthy Product: For any requirement in this AD to obtain
corrective actions from a manufacturer or other source, use these
actions if they are FAA-approved. Corrective actions are considered
FAA-approved if they are approved by the State of Design Authority
(or their delegated agent). You are required to assure the product
is airworthy before it is returned to service.

Related Information

    (k) Refer to Mandatory Continuing Airworthiness Information
(MCAI) Transport Canada Civil Aviation (TCCA), Airworthiness
Directive CF-2011-02, dated February 1, 2011; and DECA Engineering
Order EI4394, Revision 2, dated February 5, 2011; for related
information.

Material Incorporated by Reference

    (l) You must use DECA Engineering Order EI4394, Revision 2,
dated February 5, 2011, to do the actions required by this AD,
unless the AD specifies otherwise.
    (1) The Director of the Federal Register approved the
incorporation by reference of this service information under 5
U.S.C. 552(a) and 1 CFR part 51.
    (2) For service information identified in this AD, contact DECA
Aviation Engineering Limited, 7050 Telford Way Suite 200,

Mississauga, Ontario, Canada L5S 1V7; telephone<PHONE_NUMBER>; fax
(905) 405-1373; email<EMAIL_ADDRESS>Internet http://
www.deca-aviation.com.
    (3) You may review copies of the service information at the FAA,
Transport Airplane Directorate, 1601 Lind Avenue SW., Renton,
Washington. For information on the availability of this material at
the FAA, call<PHONE_NUMBER>.
    (4) You may also review copies of the service information that
is incorporated by reference at the National Archives and Records
Administration (NARA). For information on the availability of this
material at NARA, call<PHONE_NUMBER>, or go to: http://www.archives.gov/federal_register/code_of_federal_regulations/ibr_locations.html.

    Issued in Renton, Washington, on November 10, 2011.
Kalene C. Yanamura,
Acting Manager, Transport Airplane Directorate, Aircraft Certification
Service.
[FR Doc. 2011-30232 Filed 11-30-11; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910-13-P