[Federal Register Volume 84, Number 184 (Monday, September 23, 2019)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Pages 49659-49661]
[FR Doc No: 2019-20130]

=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY

40 CFR Part 52

[EPA-R05-OAR-2015-0700; FRL-9999-77-Region 5]

Air Plan Approval; Indiana; Attainment Plan for the Morgan County
Sulfur Dioxide Nonattainment Area

AGENCY: Environmental Protection Agency (EPA).

ACTION: Final rule.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) is approving as a
State Implementation Plan (SIP) revision the Morgan County-related
elements of an Indiana submission to EPA dated October 2, 2015, as
supplemented on November 15, 2017, June 7, 2017, February 8, 2019, and
February 12, 2019. EPA concludes that Indiana has appropriately
demonstrated that the plan provisions provide for attainment of the
2010 sulfur dioxide (SO2) National Ambient Air Quality
Standard (NAAQS) in the Morgan County area by the applicable attainment
date and that the plan meets the other applicable requirements under
the Clean Air Act.

DATES: This final rule is effective on October 23, 2019.

ADDRESSES: EPA has established a docket for this action under Docket ID
No. EPA-R05-OAR-2015-0700. All documents in the docket are listed on
the www.regulations.gov website. Although listed in the index, some
information is not publicly available, i.e., Confidential Business
Information (CBI) or other information whose disclosure is restricted
by statute. Certain other material, such as copyrighted material, is
not placed on the internet and will be publicly available only in hard
copy form. Publicly available docket materials are available through
www.regulations.gov, or please contact the person identified in the FOR
FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT section for additional availability
information.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: John Summerhays at EPA Region 5,
Attainment Planning and Maintenance Section, Air Programs Branch (AR-
18J), Environmental Protection Agency, Region 5, 77 West Jackson
Boulevard, Chicago, Illinois 60604,<PHONE_NUMBER>,
<EMAIL_ADDRESS>
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

I. Summary of EPA's Notice of Proposed Rulemaking

    Following the promulgation in 2010 of a 1-hour primary
SO2 NAAQS, EPA designated two townships in Morgan County,
Indiana as nonattainment for this NAAQS, in conjunction with
designating three other areas in Indiana and multiple areas in other
states as nonattainment as well. On October 2, 2015, Indiana submitted
plans addressing all four of its SO2 nonattainment areas.
EPA is taking separate action on Indiana's plans for its other
nonattainment areas: EPA proposed action on plans for the other three
areas (Indianapolis, Terre Haute and Southwest Indiana) on August 15,
2018, at 83 FR 40487, and took final action on the plans for
Indianapolis and Terre Haute on March 22, 2019, at 84 FR 10692. EPA
continues separate review of the plan for Southwest Indiana.
    In addition to its October 2, 2015 submittal, Indiana made four
supplemental submittals, three of which are relevant specifically to
Morgan County. While the October 2, 2015 submittal included rules that
imposed work practice requirements on both the Indianapolis Power and
Light-Eagle Valley power plant (IP&L-Eagle Valley) and Hydraulic Press
Brick, Indiana rescinded the submittal of the requirements for
Hydraulic Press Brick on June 7, 2017. However, Indiana then withdrew
this rescission on February 12, 2019, reactivating its request for EPA
to approve these requirements. On February 8, 2019, Indiana submitted
additional analysis for Morgan County to demonstrate that use of a more
conservative approach to estimating background concentrations in this
area also resulted in the conclusion that the area is attaining the
SO2 NAAQS. In addition, on November 15, 2017, Indiana
provided clarifications on its inventory procedures and other elements
of its four nonattainment plans.
    EPA published a notice of proposed rulemaking addressing Indiana's
plan for the Morgan County SO2 nonattainment area on July 9,
2019, at 84 FR 32672. EPA proposed to approve rules that require IP&L-
Eagle Valley to burn natural gas (rather than coal) in its primary
boilers and that require Hydraulic Press Brick to conduct dry sorbent
injection sufficient to achieve 50 percent emission reduction (except
to the extent that this control is not necessary for SO2
emissions to be below 2.5 pounds per million British Thermal Units).
EPA proposed to conclude that Indiana has demonstrated that these
requirements provide for the Morgan County area to attain the
SO2 NAAQS. Finally, EPA proposed to conclude that Indiana
has satisfied the other applicable requirements for nonattainment
areas, including requirements for a suitable emissions inventory, for
reasonably available control measures/reasonably available control
technology (RACM/RACT), for reasonable further progress (RFP), and for
contingency measures.

II. Comments

    EPA received no comments on its notice of proposed rulemaking. EPA
also has no other reason to reevaluate its proposed approval of
Indiana's plan for the Morgan County SO2 nonattainment area.

III. EPA's Final Action

    EPA is approving Indiana's SIP submission for the Morgan County
SO2 nonattainment area, which the state submitted to EPA on
October 2, 2015 and supplemented on June 7, 2017, November 15, 2017,
February 8, 2019, and February 12, 2019. This SO2
nonattainment plan included Indiana's attainment demonstration for this
area. The nonattainment plan also addressed requirements for emission
inventories, RACT/RACM, RFP, and contingency measures. Indiana has
previously addressed requirements regarding nonattainment area new
source review (NSR). EPA has determined that Indiana's SO2
nonattainment plan for Morgan County meets the applicable requirements
of Clean Air Act sections 110, 172, 191, and 192.
    The rules that underpin Indiana's attainment plan for Morgan County
include three rules. Indiana Administrative Code, Title 326, Rule 7-4-
11.1 (326 IAC 7-4-11.1, entitled ``Morgan County sulfur dioxide
emission limitations'') imposes the work practice requirements
described above. Indiana's SO2 nonattainment plans also
include two rules specifying compliance provisions, namely Rule 326 IAC
7-1.1-3 (entitled ``Compliance date'') and Rule 326 IAC 7-2-1 (entitled
``Reporting requirements; methods to determine compliance''). However,
EPA has already approved these two compliance rules, as part of final
action to approve Indiana's plan for the Indianapolis and Terre Haute
areas. Therefore, while EPA

reaffirms the role of these two rules in the Morgan County plan, EPA
need not reapprove and is not reapproving these rules as part of
today's action. Instead, the codification for this rule only adds the
approval of Morgan County limits in Rule 326 IAC 7-4-11.1.
    In addition to codifying approval of these rules, EPA is also
codifying its approval of Indiana's attainment plan for Morgan County.
EPA's prior action to approve the attainment plans for the Indianapolis
and Terre Haute areas (published March 22, 2019 at 84 FR 10692) did not
codify approval of those plans; for administrative convenience,
codification of those approvals is included with the codification of
this action.

IV. Incorporation by Reference

    In this rule, EPA is finalizing regulatory text that includes
incorporation by reference. In accordance with requirements of 1 CFR
51.5, EPA is finalizing the incorporation by reference of an Indiana
regulation described in the amendments to 40 CFR part 52 set forth
below. EPA has made, and will continue to make, these documents
generally available through www.regulations.gov, and at the EPA Region
5 Office (please contact the applicable person identified in the For
Further Information Contact section of this preamble for more
information). Therefore, these materials have been approved by EPA for
inclusion in the State implementation plan, have been incorporated by
reference by EPA into that plan, are fully federally enforceable under
sections 110 and 113 of the Clean Air Act as of the effective date of
the final rulemaking of EPA's approval, and will be incorporated by
reference in the next update to the SIP compilation.\1\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \1\ 62 FR 27968 (May 22, 1997).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

V. Statutory and Executive Order Reviews

    Under the Clean Air Act, the Administrator is required to approve a
SIP submission that complies with the provisions of the Clean Air Act
and applicable Federal regulations. 42 U.S.C. 7410(k); 40 CFR 52.02(a).
Thus, in reviewing SIP submissions, EPA's role is to approve state
choices, provided that they meet the criteria of the Clean Air Act.
Accordingly, this action merely approves state law as meeting Federal
requirements and does not impose additional requirements beyond those
imposed by state law. For that reason, this action:
     Is not a significant regulatory action subject to review
by the Office of Management and Budget under Executive Orders 12866 (58
FR 51735, October 4, 1993) and 13563 (76 FR 3821, January 21, 2011);
     Is not an Executive Order 13771 (82 FR 9339, February 2,
2017) regulatory action because SIP approvals are exempted under
Executive Order 12866;
     Does not impose an information collection burden under the
provisions of the Paperwork Reduction Act (44 U.S.C. 3501 et seq.);
     Is certified as not having a significant economic impact
on a substantial number of small entities under the Regulatory
Flexibility Act (5 U.S.C. 601 et seq.);
     Does not contain any unfunded mandate or significantly or
uniquely affect small governments, as described in the Unfunded
Mandates Reform Act of 1995 (Pub. L. 104-4);
     Does not have federalism implications as specified in
Executive Order 13132 (64 FR 43255, August 10, 1999);
     Is not an economically significant regulatory action based
on health or safety risks subject to Executive Order 13045 (62 FR
19885, April 23, 1997);
     Is not a significant regulatory action subject to
Executive Order 13211 (66 FR 28355, May 22, 2001);
     Is not subject to requirements of Section 12(d) of the
National Technology Transfer and Advancement Act of 1995 (15 U.S.C. 272
note) because application of those requirements would be inconsistent
with the Clean Air Act; and
     Does not provide EPA with the discretionary authority to
address, as appropriate, disproportionate human health or environmental
effects, using practicable and legally permissible methods, under
Executive Order 12898 (59 FR 7629, February 16, 1994).
    In addition, the SIP is not approved to apply on any Indian
reservation land or in any other area where EPA or an Indian tribe has
demonstrated that a tribe has jurisdiction. In those areas of Indian
country, the rule does not have tribal implications and will not impose
substantial direct costs on tribal governments or preempt tribal law as
specified by Executive Order 13175 (65 FR 67249, November 9, 2000).
    The Congressional Review Act, 5 U.S.C. 801 et seq., as added by the
Small Business Regulatory Enforcement Fairness Act of 1996, generally
provides that before a rule may take effect, the agency promulgating
the rule must submit a rule report, which includes a copy of the rule,
to each House of the Congress and to the Comptroller General of the
United States. EPA will submit a report containing this action and
other required information to the U.S. Senate, the U.S. House of
Representatives, and the Comptroller General of the United States prior
to publication of the rule in the Federal Register. A major rule cannot
take effect until 60 days after it is published in the Federal
Register. This action is not a ``major rule'' as defined by 5 U.S.C.
804(2).
    Under section 307(b)(1) of the Clean Air Act, petitions for
judicial review of this action must be filed in the United States Court
of Appeals for the appropriate circuit by November 22, 2019. Filing a
petition for reconsideration by the Administrator of this final rule
does not affect the finality of this action for the purposes of
judicial review nor does it extend the time within which a petition for
judicial review may be filed, and shall not postpone the effectiveness
of such rule or action. This action may not be challenged later in
proceedings to enforce its requirements. (See section 307(b)(2).)

List of Subjects in 40 CFR Part 52

    Environmental protection, Air pollution control, Incorporation by
Reference, Reporting and recordkeeping requirements, Sulfur oxides.

    Authority: 42 U.S.C. 7401 et seq.

    Dated: September 4, 2019.
Cheryl L Newton,
Acting Regional Administrator, Region 5.

    40 CFR part 52 is amended as follows:

PART 52--APPROVAL AND PROMULGATION OF IMPLEMENTATION PLANS

0
1. The authority citation for part 52 continues to read as follows:

    Authority:  42 U.S.C. 7401 et seq.

0
2. Section 52.770 is amended:
0
a. In the table in paragraph (c), under ``Article 7. Sulfur Dioxide
Rules'', ``Rule 4. Emission Limitations and Requirements by County'',
by removing the entry for ``7-4-11'' and adding in its place an entry
for ``7-4-11.1''; and
0
b. In the table in paragraph (e) by:
0
i. Adding an entry for ``Indianapolis 2010 Sulfur Dioxide
(SO2) Attainment Plan'' after the entry for ``Indianapolis
Hydrocarbon Control Strategy'';
0
ii. Adding an entry for ``Morgan County 2010 Sulfur Dioxide
(SO2) Attainment Plan'' before the entry for ``Muncie 1997
8-hour ozone maintenance plan''; and
0
iii. Adding an entry for ``Terre Haute 2010 Sulfur Dioxide
(SO2) Attainment Plan'' before the entry for ``Terre Haute
2010 Sulfur Dioxide (SO2) maintenance plan''.
    The revision and additions read as follows:

Sec.  52.770  Identification of plan.

* * * * *
    (c) * * *

                                                            EPA-Approved Indiana Regulations
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
                                                                          Indiana
           Indiana citation                       Subject             effective date        EPA approval date                       Notes
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

                                                                      * * * * * * *
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
                                                             Article 7. Sulfur Dioxide Rules
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

                                                                      * * * * * * *
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
                                                 Rule 4. Emission Limitations and Requirements by County
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

                                                                      * * * * * * *
7-4-11.1.............................  Morgan County sulfur dioxide         7/5/2019  9/23/2019, [insert Federal     ...................................
                                        emission limitations.                          Register
                                                                                citation]....................

                                                                      * * * * * * *
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

* * * * *
    (e) * * *

                       EPA-Approved Indiana Nonregulatory and Quasi-Regulatory Provisions
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
                Title                  Indiana date         EPA approval                  Explanation
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

                                                  * * * * * * *
Indianapolis 2010 Sulfur Dioxide             10/2/15  3/22/2019, 84 FR 10692.  .................................
 (SO2) Attainment Plan.

                                                  * * * * * * *
Morgan County 2010 Sulfur Dioxide            10/2/15  9/23/2019, [insert       .................................
 (SO2) Attainment Plan.                                Federal Register
                                                       citation].

                                                  * * * * * * *
Terre Haute 2010 Sulfur Dioxide              10/2/15  3/22/2019, 84 FR 10692.  .................................
 (SO2) Attainment Plan.

                                                  * * * * * * *
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

[FR Doc. 2019-20130 Filed 9-20-19; 8:45 am]
 BILLING CODE 6560-50-P


[Federal Register: April 2, 2007 (Volume 72, Number 62)]
[Notices]
[Page 15682]
[DOCID:fr02ap07-54]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission

[Project No. 10228-038]

American Municipal Power--Ohio, Inc., Cannelton Hydroelectric
Project, L.P.; Notice of Availability of Environmental Assessment

March 27, 2007.
    In accordance with the National Environmental Policy Act of 1969
and the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission (Commission or FERC)
regulations contained in the Code of Federal Regulations (CFR) (18 CFR
part 380 [FERC Order No. 486, 52 FR 47897]), the Office of Energy
Projects staff (staff) reviewed a proposal to amend the design
authorized by the license for the Cannelton Hydroelectric Project, to
be located at the U.S. Corps of Engineers' Cannelton Locks and Dam on
the Ohio River in Hancock County, Kentucky, and prepared an
environmental assessment (EA) for the proposed amendment of the project
license. In this EA, staff analyzes the potential environmental effects
of replacing the authorized 140 small generator units with three
conventional turbine and generator units and concludes that the
amendment would not constitute a major federal action significantly
affecting the quality of the human environment.
    A copy of the EA is attached to a Commission order titled ``Order
Amending License,'' issued March 22, 2007 and is available for review
at the Commission in the Public Reference Room, located at 888 First
Street, NE., Room 2A, Washington, DC 20426, or may be viewed on the
Commission's Web site at http://www.ferc.gov using the ``eLibrary''

link. Enter the docket number excluding the last three digits in the
docket number field to access the document. For assistance, call toll-
free 1-866-208-3676 or e-mail<EMAIL_ADDRESS>For TTY, call
(202) 502-8659.

Philis J. Posey,
Acting Secretary.
 [FR Doc. E7-5997 Filed 3-30-07; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 6717-01-P


[Federal Register: October 27, 2008 (Volume 73, Number 208)]
[Notices]
[Page 63750-63752]
[DOCID:fr27oc08-102]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

[Release No. 34-58829; File No. SR-CBOE-2008-108]

Self-Regulatory Organizations; Chicago Board Options Exchange,
Incorporated; Notice of Filing and Immediate Effectiveness of Proposed
Rule Change To Immediately Add Two New VIX Option Series Within Five
Days of Expiration

October 21, 2008.
    Pursuant to Section 19(b)(1) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934
(the ``Act'') \1\ and Rule 19b-4 thereunder,\2\ notice is hereby given
that on October 16, 2008, the Chicago Board Options

Exchange, Incorporated (the ``Exchange'' or ``CBOE'') filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission (the ``Commission'') the proposed
rule change as described in Items I and II below, which Items have been
prepared by the Exchange. The Exchange filed the proposal as a ``non-
controversial'' proposed rule change pursuant to Section
19(b)(3)(A)(iii) of the Act \3\ and Rule 19b-4(f)(6) thereunder.\4\ The
Commission is publishing this notice to solicit comments on the
proposed rule change from interested persons.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \1\ 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(1).
    \2\ 17 CFR 240.19b-4.
    \3\ 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(3)(A)(iii).
    \4\ 17 CFR 240.19b-4(f)(6).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

I. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement of the Terms of Substance
of the Proposed Rule Change

    CBOE is seeking to immediately list two new series of CBOE
Volatility Index (``VIX'') options prior to expiration next Wednesday,
October 22, 2008, notwithstanding Interpretation and Policy .01(c) to
Rule 24.9, Terms of Index Option Contracts. The Exchange is not
proposing any rule text changes. Although the proposed rule change
would not amend the text of Rule 24.9.01(c), the proposed change would
have the effect of permitting the Exchange to immediately add two new
series of VIX options within five business days prior to VIX expiration
on Wednesday, October 22, 2008.

II. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement of the Purpose of, and
Statutory Basis for, the Proposed Rule Change

    In its filing with the Commission, the Exchange included statements
concerning the purpose of and basis for the proposed rule change and
discussed any comments it received on the proposed rule change. The
text of those statements may be examined at the places specified in
Item IV below. The Exchange has prepared summaries, set forth in
Sections A, B, and C below, of the most significant parts of such
statements.

A. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement of the Purpose of, and
Statutory Basis for, the Proposed Rule Change

1. Purpose
    The purpose of this proposed rule change is to allow the Exchange
to immediately list two new series of VIX options prior to expiration
next Wednesday, October 22, 2008.
    The Exchange notes the exceptional market circumstances giving rise
to this limited request relate only to VIX options. The Exchange states
that this request will facilitate the functioning of the Exchange's
market and will not harm investors or the public interest. VIX options
are a unique product traded only at CBOE and unprecedented market
volatility has caused the Exchange to respond to requests from market
participants to offer the limited request sought by this proposal.
    Interpretation and Policy .01(c) to Rule 24.9 provides, ``[n]ew
series of index option contracts may be added up to the fifth business
day prior to expiration.'' Under this Rule 24.9.01(c), the last day for
the Exchange to add new series of expiring October VIX option was
Wednesday, October 15, 2008.
    However, given the current extraordinary market conditions and
considerable market volatility, the Exchange has received user requests
to add two new additional VIX option series--110 and 120 strikes
expiring next Wednesday, October 22, 2008. The Exchange believes that
these requests are reasonable and will allow for more efficient risk
management. Specifically, liquidity providers are selling the 100
October 2008 VIX option contracts without the ability to hedge those
positions with an option having a higher strike. Currently, the highest
strike listed for expiring October 2008 VIX options is 100. In
addition, the Exchange believes that because of the recent volatility
in the market, the addition of the two VIX option series will help
prepare the market in the event there are large shifts in the time
remaining until expiration. On the day of this filing, the VIX level
reached 81.
2. Statutory Basis
    The Exchange believes that the proposed rule change is consistent
with the requirements provided under Section 6(b)(5) \5\ of the Act,
that the rules of an exchange be designed to promote just and equitable
principles of trade, to prevent fraudulent and manipulative acts and,
in general, to protect investors and the public interest. The addition
of the two requested VIX option series will facilitate the functioning
of the Exchange's market by allowing for more efficient risk management
and will not harm investors or the public interest.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \5\ 15 U.S.C. 78(f)(b)(5).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

B. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement on Burden on Competition

    CBOE does not believe that the proposed rule change will impose any
burden on competition not necessary or appropriate in furtherance of
the purposes of the Act.

C. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement on Comments on the Proposed
Rule Change Received From Members, Participants, or Others

    No written comments were solicited or received with respect to the
proposed rule change.

III. Date of Effectiveness of the Proposed Rule Change and Timing for
Commission Action

    Because the foregoing rule does not: (1) Significantly affect the
protection of investors or the public interest; (2) impose any
significant burden on competition; and (3) become operative for 30 days
after the date of this filing, or such shorter time as the Commission
may designate, it has become effective pursuant to Section 19(b)(3)(A)
of the Act \6\ and Rule 19b-4(f)(6) thereunder.\7\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \6\ 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(3)(A).
    \7\ 17 CFR 240.19b-4(f)(6). In addition, Rule 19b-4(f)(6)(iii)
requires a self-regulatory organization to provide the Commission
with written notice of its intent to file the proposed rule change,
along with a brief description and text of the proposed rule change,
at least five business days prior to the date of filing of the
proposed rule change, or such shorter time as designated by the
Commission. The Exchange fulfilled this requirement.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    A proposed rule change filed under 19b-4(f)(6) normally may not
become operative prior to 30 days after the date of filing.\8\ However,
Rule 19b-4(f)(6)(iii) \9\ permits the Commission to designate a shorter
time if such action is consistent with the protection of investors and
the public interest. The Exchange has requested that the Commission
waive the 30-day operative delay. The Commission believes that waiving
the 30-day operative delay is consistent with the protection of
investors and the public interest because such waiver will allow the
Exchange to immediately list the two new VIX option series prior to
expiration on Wednesday, October 22, 2008.\10\ In particular, the
addition by the Exchange of these two VIX option series has been
necessitated, in the opinion of CBOE, by the current extraordinary
market conditions and unusual levels of volatility. Allowing CBOE to
immediately offer these new series will allow market participants to
efficiently manage their volatility risk in current market conditions
and will help market participants prepare for any potential significant
movements in the VIX that may occur prior to expiration.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \8\ 17 CFR 240.19b-4(f)(6)(iii).
    \9\ Id.
    \10\ For purposes only of waiving the 30-day operative delay,
the Commission has also considered the proposed rule's effect on
efficiency, competition, and capital formation. See 15 U.S.C.
78c(f).

---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    At any time within 60 days of the filing of such proposed rule
change, the Commission may summarily abrogate such rule change if it
appears to the Commission that such action is necessary or appropriate
in the public interest, for the protection of investors, or otherwise
in furtherance of the purposes of the Act.

IV. Solicitation of Comments

    Interested persons are invited to submit written data, views, and
arguments concerning the foregoing, including whether the proposed rule
change is consistent with the Act. Comments may be submitted by any of
the following methods:

Electronic Comments

     Use the Commission's Internet comment form (http://
www.sec.gov/rules/sro.shtml); or
     Send an e-mail to<EMAIL_ADDRESS>Please include
File Number SR-CBOE-2008-108 on the subject line.

Paper Comments

     Send paper comments in triplicate to Secretary, Securities
and Exchange Commission, 100 F Street, NE., Washington, DC 20549-1090.

All submissions should refer to File Number SR-CBOE-2008-108. This file
number should be included on the subject line if e-mail is used. To
help the Commission process and review your comments more efficiently,
please use only one method. The Commission will post all comments on
the Commission's Internet Web site (http://www.sec.gov/rules/
sro.shtml). Copies of the submission, all subsequent amendments, all
written statements with respect to the proposed rule change that are
filed with the Commission, and all written communications relating to
the proposed rule change between the Commission and any person, other
than those that may be withheld from the public in accordance with the
provisions of 5 U.S.C. 552, will be available for inspection and
copying in the Commission's Public Reference Room, 100 F Street, NE.,
Washington, DC 20549, on official business days between the hours of 10
a.m. and 3 p.m. Copies of the filing also will be available for
inspection and copying at the principal office of the Exchange. All
comments received will be posted without change; the Commission does
not edit personal identifying information from submissions. You should
submit only information that you wish to make available publicly. All
submissions should refer to File Number SR-CBOE-2008-108 and should be
submitted on or before November 17, 2008.

    For the Commission, by the Division of Trading and Markets,
pursuant to delegated authority.\11\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \11\ 17 CFR 200.30-3(a)(12).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

Florence E. Harmon,
Acting Secretary.
 [FR Doc. E8-25538 Filed 10-24-08; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 8011-01-P


[Federal Register: October 3, 2005 (Volume 70, Number 190)]
[Notices]
[Page 57579]
[DOCID:fr03oc05-66]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission

[Docket Nos. CP05-29-001]

Notice of Application

September 23, 2005.
    On September 14, 2005, Freebird Gas Storage LLC (Freebird) filed an
application pursuant to section 7(c) of the Natural Gas Act and Part
157 of the regulations of the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission
(Commission) requesting to amend its Certificate of Public Convenience
and Necessity issued on April 15, 2005. Freebird requests authorization
for modifications to certain storage facilities at its East Detroit
Storage Facility in Lamar County, Alabama. These modifications include
eliminating three well pads, moving two wells to a new well pad, and
adding a new well to an existing well pad. No changes to the field's
capacity or deliverability are proposed. This filing is available for
review at the Commission in the Public Reference Room or may be viewed
on the Commission's Web site at http://www.ferc.gov using the ``e-

Library'' link. Enter the docket number excluding the last three digits
in the docket number field to access the document. For assistance,
contact FERC at<EMAIL_ADDRESS>or call toll-free, (866)
208-3676, or for TTY,<PHONE_NUMBER>.
    Any questions regarding this application should be directed to Gil
Muhl, Freebird Gas Storage, LLC, 6363 Woodway, Suite 415, Houston, TX
77057, phone<PHONE_NUMBER>, or G. Mark Cook, Baker Botts L.L.P., The
Warner, 1299 Pennsylvania Ave., NW., Washington, DC 20004-2400, phone
(202) 639-7700.
    There are two ways to become involved in the Commission's review of
this project. First, any person wishing to obtain legal status by
becoming a party to the proceedings for this project should, on or
before the comment date stated below file with the Federal Energy
Regulatory Commission, 888 First Street, NE., Washington, DC 20426, a
motion to intervene in accordance with the requirements of the
Commission's Rules of Practice and Procedure (18 CFR 385.214 or
385.211) and the Regulations under the NGA (18 CFR 157.10). A person
obtaining party status will be placed on the service list maintained by
the Secretary of the Commission and will receive copies of all
documents filed by the applicant and by all other parties. A party must
submit 14 copies of filings made in the proceeding with the Commission
and must mail a copy to the applicant and to every other party. Only
parties to the proceeding can ask for court review of Commission orders
in the proceeding.
    However, a person does not have to intervene in order to have
comments considered. The second way to participate is by filing with
the Secretary of the Commission, as soon as possible, an original and
two copies of comments in support of or in opposition to this project.
The Commission will consider these comments in determining the
appropriate action to be taken, but the filing of a comment alone will
not serve to make the filer a party to the proceeding. The Commission's
rules require that persons filing comments in opposition to the project
provide copies of their protests only to the party or parties directly
involved in the protest.
    Persons who wish to comment only on the environmental review of
this project should submit an original and two copies of their comments
to the Secretary of the Commission. Environmental commenters will be
placed on the Commission's environmental mailing list, will receive
copies of the environmental documents, and will be notified of meetings
associated with the Commission's environmental review process.
Environmental commenters will not be required to serve copies of filed
documents on all other parties. However, the non-party commenters will
not receive copies of all documents filed by other parties or issued by
the Commission (except for the mailing of environmental documents
issued by the Commission) and will not have the right to seek court
review of the Commission's final order.
    Protests and interventions may be filed electronically via the
Internet in lieu of paper; see, 18 CFR 385.2001(a)(1)(iii) and the
instructions on the Commission's Web site under the ``e-Filing'' link.
The Commission strongly encourages electronic filings.
    Comment Date: October 3, 2005.

Magalie R. Salas,
Secretary.
 [FR Doc. E5-5372 Filed 9-30-05; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 6717-01-P


[Federal Register Volume 88, Number 61 (Thursday, March 30, 2023)]
[Proposed Rules]
[Pages 19019-19021]
[FR Doc No: 2023-06492]

========================================================================
Proposed Rules
                                                Federal Register
________________________________________________________________________

This section of the FEDERAL REGISTER contains notices to the public of
the proposed issuance of rules and regulations. The purpose of these
notices is to give interested persons an opportunity to participate in
the rule making prior to the adoption of the final rules.

========================================================================

Federal Register / Vol. 88, No. 61 / Thursday, March 30, 2023 /
Proposed Rules

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION

Federal Aviation Administration

14 CFR Part 39

[Docket No. FAA-2023-0654; Project Identifier MCAI-2022-01505-T]
RIN 2120-AA64

Airworthiness Directives; Airbus Canada Limited Partnership (Type
Certificate Previously Held by C Series Aircraft Limited Partnership
(CSALP); Bombardier, Inc.) Airplanes

AGENCY: Federal Aviation Administration (FAA), DOT.

ACTION: Notice of proposed rulemaking (NPRM).

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The FAA proposes to adopt a new airworthiness directive (AD)
for certain Airbus Canada Limited Partnership Model BD-500-1A10 and BD-
500-1A11 airplanes. This proposed AD was prompted by reports that,
during instrument landing system (ILS) approaches, the flight control
system reverted from primary flight control computer (PFCC) normal mode
operating in autopilot to remote electronics unit (REU) direct mode,
and then, after a period of time, to PFCC direct mode. This proposed AD
would require installation of a PFCC software update; and a records
review or detailed inspection to identify pre-existing repairs or
damage within certain limits to certain structures, and obtaining and
following additional instructions if necessary; as specified in a
Transport Canada AD, which is proposed for incorporation by reference
(IBR). The FAA is proposing this AD to address the unsafe condition on
these products.

DATES: The FAA must receive comments on this proposed AD by May 15,
2023.

ADDRESSES: You may send comments, using the procedures found in 14 CFR
11.43 and 11.45, by any of the following methods:
     Federal eRulemaking Portal: Go to regulations.gov. Follow
the instructions for submitting comments.
     Fax:<PHONE_NUMBER>.
     Mail: U.S. Department of Transportation, Docket
Operations, M-30, West Building Ground Floor, Room W12-140, 1200 New
Jersey Avenue SE, Washington, DC 20590.
     Hand Delivery: Deliver to Mail address above between 9
a.m. and 5 p.m., Monday through Friday, except Federal holidays.
    AD Docket: You may examine the AD docket at regulations.gov under
Docket No. FAA-2023-0654; or in person at Docket Operations between 9
a.m. and 5 p.m., Monday through Friday, except Federal holidays. The AD
docket contains this NPRM, the mandatory continuing airworthiness
information (MCAI), any comments received, and other information. The
street address for Docket Operations is listed above.
    Material Incorporated by Reference:
     For material that is proposed for IBR in this NPRM,
contact Transport Canada, Transport Canada National Aircraft
Certification, 159 Cleopatra Drive, Nepean, Ontario K1A 0N5, Canada;
telephone<PHONE_NUMBER>; email [email protected]; website tc.canada.ca/en/
aviation. It is also available at regulations.gov under Docket No. FAA-
2023-0654.
     You may view this service information at the FAA,
Airworthiness Products Section, Operational Safety Branch, 2200 South
216th Street, Des Moines, WA. For information on the availability of
this material at the FAA, call<PHONE_NUMBER>.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Steven Dzierzynski, Aerospace
Engineer, Avionics & Electrical Systems Section, FAA, New York ACO
Branch, 1600 Stewart Avenue, Suite 410, Westbury, NY 11590; telephone
516-228-7367; email [email protected].

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

Comments Invited

    The FAA invites you to send any written relevant data, views, or
arguments about this proposal. Send your comments to an address listed
under ADDRESSES. Include ``Docket No. FAA-2023-0654; Project Identifier
MCAI-2022-01505-T'' at the beginning of your comments. The most helpful
comments reference a specific portion of the proposal, explain the
reason for any recommended change, and include supporting data. The FAA
will consider all comments received by the closing date and may amend
this proposal because of those comments.
    Except for Confidential Business Information (CBI) as described in
the following paragraph, and other information as described in 14 CFR
11.35, the FAA will post all comments received, without change, to
regulations.gov, including any personal information you provide. The
agency will also post a report summarizing each substantive verbal
contact received about this NPRM.

Confidential Business Information

    CBI is commercial or financial information that is both customarily
and actually treated as private by its owner. Under the Freedom of
Information Act (FOIA) (5 U.S.C. 552), CBI is exempt from public
disclosure. If your comments responsive to this NPRM contain commercial
or financial information that is customarily treated as private, that
you actually treat as private, and that is relevant or responsive to
this NPRM, it is important that you clearly designate the submitted
comments as CBI. Please mark each page of your submission containing
CBI as ``PROPIN.'' The FAA will treat such marked submissions as
confidential under the FOIA, and they will not be placed in the public
docket of this NPRM. Submissions containing CBI should be sent to
Steven Dzierzynski, Aerospace Engineer, Avionics & Electrical Systems
Section, FAA, New York ACO Branch, 1600 Stewart Avenue, Suite 410,
Westbury, NY 11590; telephone<PHONE_NUMBER>; email [email protected]. Any commentary that the FAA receives which is not
specifically designated as CBI will be placed in the public docket for
this rulemaking.

Background

    Transport Canada, which is the aviation authority for Canada, has
issued Transport Canada AD CF-2022-65, dated November 23, 2022
(Transport Canada AD CF-2022-65) (also referred to as the MCAI), to
correct an unsafe condition for certain Airbus Canada Limited
Partnership Model BD-500-1A10 and BD-500-1A11 airplanes. The MCAI
states that airplanes equipped with the CAT IIIB Autoland option, have
had numerous occurrences during ILS approaches where the flight control
system has reverted from PFCC normal

mode operating in autopilot to REU direct mode, and then, after a
period of time, to PFCC direct mode. During these occurrences, the
caution message FLT CTRL DIRECT is posted on the engine indication and
crew alerting system (EICAS). The MCAI states that it requires a PFCC
software update, which includes control law updates that require review
and disposition of previous repairs and damage assessments prior to
conducting the software update. These pre-existing repairs and damage
may exceed the Aircraft Structural Repair Publication (ASRP) permitted
damage limits for affected structures and would affect the control
laws.
    The FAA is proposing this AD to address reversion to direct mode
during ILS approaches, which, if not corrected, could impact flight
control functions, which could prevent continued safe flight and
landing. See the MCAI for additional background information.
    You may examine the MCAI in the AD docket at regulations.gov under
Docket No. FAA-2023-0654.

Related Service Information Under 1 CFR Part 51

    Transport Canada AD CF-2022-65 specifies procedures for installing
updated PFCC software; this installation includes pre-requisites that
must be met prior to the installation (installing certain database
versions and software). In addition, the installation requires a
records review or detailed inspection to identify pre-existing repairs
and damages (that were within ASRP limits) to certain structures and
obtaining and following additional instructions. This material is
reasonably available because the interested parties have access to it
through their normal course of business or by the means identified in
ADDRESSES.

FAA's Determination

    This product has been approved by the aviation authority of another
country and is approved for operation in the United States. Pursuant to
the FAA's bilateral agreement with the State of Design Authority, it
has notified the FAA of the unsafe condition described in the MCAI
described above. The FAA is issuing this NPRM after determining that
the unsafe condition described previously is likely to exist or develop
in other products of the same type design.

Proposed AD Requirements in This NPRM

    This proposed AD would require accomplishing the actions specified
in Transport Canada AD CF-2022-65 described previously, except for any
differences identified as exceptions in the regulatory text of this
proposed AD.

Explanation of Required Compliance Information

    In the FAA's ongoing efforts to improve the efficiency of the AD
process, the FAA developed a process to use some civil aviation
authority (CAA) ADs as the primary source of information for compliance
with requirements for corresponding FAA ADs. The FAA has been
coordinating this process with manufacturers and CAAs. As a result, the
FAA proposes to incorporate Transport Canada AD CF-2022-65 by reference
in the FAA final rule. This proposed AD would, therefore, require
compliance with Transport Canada AD CF-2022-65 in its entirety through
that incorporation, except for any differences identified as exceptions
in the regulatory text of this proposed AD. Service information
required by Transport Canada AD CF-2022-65 for compliance will be
available at regulations.gov under Docket No. FAA-2023-0654 after the
FAA final rule is published.

Costs of Compliance

    The FAA estimates that this AD, if adopted as proposed, would
affect 72 airplanes of U.S. registry. The FAA estimates the following
costs to comply with this proposed AD:

                                      Estimated Costs for Required Actions
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
                                                                                Cost per       Cost on U.S.
                          Labor cost                              Parts cost        product         operators
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
4 work-hours x $85 per hour = $340...........................             $14             $354          $25,488
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

    The FAA has received no definitive data on which to base the cost
estimates for the on-condition actions specified in this proposed AD.
    The FAA has included all known costs in its cost estimate.
According to the manufacturer, however, some or all of the costs of
this proposed AD may be covered under warranty, thereby reducing the
cost impact on affected operators.

Authority for This Rulemaking

    Title 49 of the United States Code specifies the FAA's authority to
issue rules on aviation safety. Subtitle I, section 106, describes the
authority of the FAA Administrator. Subtitle VII: Aviation Programs,
describes in more detail the scope of the Agency's authority.
    The FAA is issuing this rulemaking under the authority described in
Subtitle VII, Part A, Subpart III, Section 44701: General requirements.
Under that section, Congress charges the FAA with promoting safe flight
of civil aircraft in air commerce by prescribing regulations for
practices, methods, and procedures the Administrator finds necessary
for safety in air commerce. This regulation is within the scope of that
authority because it addresses an unsafe condition that is likely to
exist or develop on products identified in this rulemaking action.

Regulatory Findings

    The FAA determined that this proposed AD would not have federalism
implications under Executive Order 13132. This proposed AD would not
have a substantial direct effect on the States, on the relationship
between the national Government and the States, or on the distribution
of power and responsibilities among the various levels of government.
    For the reasons discussed above, I certify this proposed
regulation:
    (1) Is not a ``significant regulatory action'' under Executive
Order 12866,
    (2) Would not affect intrastate aviation in Alaska, and
    (3) Would not have a significant economic impact, positive or
negative, on a substantial number of small entities under the criteria
of the Regulatory Flexibility Act.

List of Subjects in 14 CFR Part 39

    Air transportation, Aircraft, Aviation safety, Incorporation by
reference, Safety.

The Proposed Amendment

    Accordingly, under the authority delegated to me by the
Administrator, the FAA proposes to amend 14 CFR part 39 as follows:

PART 39--AIRWORTHINESS DIRECTIVES

0
1. The authority citation for part 39 continues to read as follows:

    Authority:  49 U.S.C. 106(g), 40113, 44701.

Sec.  39.13  [Amended]

0
2. The FAA amends Sec.  39.13 by adding the following new airworthiness
directive:

Airbus Canada Limited Partnership (Type Certificate Previously Held
by C Series Aircraft Limited Partnership (CSALP); Bombardier, Inc.):
Docket No. FAA-2023-0654; Project Identifier MCAI-2022-01505-T.

(a) Comments Due Date

    The FAA must receive comments on this airworthiness directive
(AD) by May 15, 2023.

(b) Affected ADs

    None.

(c) Applicability

    This AD applies to Airbus Canada Limited Partnership (Type
Certificate previously held by C Series Aircraft Limited Partnership
(CSALP); Bombardier, Inc.) Model BD-500-1A10 and BD-500-1A11
airplanes, certificated in any category, as identified in Transport
Canada AD CF-2022-65, dated November 23, 2022 (Transport Canada AD
CF-2022-65).

(d) Subject

    Air Transport Association (ATA) of America Code: 27, Flight
control system.

(e) Unsafe Condition

    This AD was prompted by reports that, during instrument landing
system (ILS) approaches, the flight control system reverted from
primary flight control computer (PFCC) normal mode operating in
autopilot to remote electronics unit (REU) direct mode, and then,
after a period of time, to PFCC direct mode. The FAA is issuing this
AD to address reversion to direct mode during ILS approaches, which,
if not corrected, could impact flight control functions and could
prevent continued safe flight and landing.

(f) Compliance

    Comply with this AD within the compliance times specified,
unless already done.

(g) Requirements

    Except as specified in paragraph (h) of this AD: Comply with all
required actions and compliance times specified in, and in
accordance with, Transport Canada AD CF-2022-65.

(h) Exceptions to Transport Canada AD CF 2022-65

    (1) Where Transport Canada AD CF-2022-65 refers to its effective
date, this AD requires using the effective date of this AD.
    (2) Where the service information referenced in Transport Canada
AD CF-2022-65 specifies installing software updates on the PFCCs
using a USB-type device, this AD also allows the use of a portable
maintenance access terminal (PMAT)-type device.
    Note 1 to paragraph (h)(2): When using a PMAT-type device,
guidance for updating the software can be found in Airbus Canada
Service Bulletin (SB) BD500-270020, Issue 001, dated September 28,
2022.

(i) Additional AD Provisions

    The following provisions also apply to this AD:
    (1) Alternative Methods of Compliance (AMOCs): The Manager, New
York ACO Branch, FAA, has the authority to approve AMOCs for this
AD, if requested using the procedures found in 14 CFR 39.19. In
accordance with 14 CFR 39.19, send your request to your principal
inspector or responsible Flight Standards Office, as appropriate. If
sending information directly to the manager of the certification
office, send it to ATTN: Program Manager, Continuing Operational
Safety, FAA, New York ACO Branch, 1600 Stewart Avenue, Suite 410,
Westbury, NY 11590; telephone<PHONE_NUMBER>; email [email protected]. Before using any approved AMOC, notify your appropriate
principal inspector, or lacking a principal inspector, the manager
of the responsible Flight Standards Office.
    (2) Contacting the Manufacturer: For any requirement in this AD
to obtain instructions from a manufacturer, the instructions must be
accomplished using a method approved by the Manager, New York ACO
Branch, FAA; or Transport Canada; or Airbus Canada Limited
Partnership's Transport Canada Design Approval Organization (DAO).
If approved by the DAO, the approval must include the DAO-authorized
signature.
    (3) Required for Compliance (RC): Except as required by
paragraph (i)(2) of this AD, if any service information contains
procedures or tests that are identified as RC, those procedures and
tests must be done to comply with this AD; any procedures or tests
that are not identified as RC are recommended. Those procedures and
tests that are not identified as RC may be deviated from using
accepted methods in accordance with the operator's maintenance or
inspection program without obtaining approval of an AMOC, provided
the procedures and tests identified as RC can be done and the
airplane can be put back in an airworthy condition. Any
substitutions or changes to procedures or tests identified as RC
require approval of an AMOC.

(j) Additional Information

    (1) For more information about this AD, contact Steven
Dzierzynski, Aerospace Engineer, Avionics & Electrical Systems
Section, FAA, New York ACO Branch, 1600 Stewart Avenue, Suite 410,
Westbury, NY 11590; telephone<PHONE_NUMBER>; email [email protected].
    (2) For Airbus Canada service information identified in this AD
that is not incorporated by reference, contact Airbus Canada Limited
Partnership, 13100 Henri-Fabre Boulevard, Mirabel, Qu[eacute]bec J7N
3C6, Canada; telephone<PHONE_NUMBER>; email [email protected];
website a220world.airbus.com. You may view this service information
at the FAA, Airworthiness Products Section, Operational Safety
Branch, 2200 South 216th Street, Des Moines, WA. For information on
the availability of this material at the FAA, call<PHONE_NUMBER>.

(k) Material Incorporated by Reference

    (1) The Director of the Federal Register approved the
incorporation by reference (IBR) of the service information listed
in this paragraph under 5 U.S.C. 552(a) and 1 CFR part 51.
    (2) You must use this service information as applicable to do
the actions required by this AD, unless this AD specifies otherwise.
    (i) Transport Canada AD CF-2022-65, dated November 23, 2022.
    (ii) [Reserved]
    (3) For Transport Canada AD CF-2022-65, contact Transport
Canada, Transport Canada National Aircraft Certification, 159
Cleopatra Drive, Nepean, Ontario K1A 0N5, Canada; telephone 888-663-
3639; email [email protected]; website tc.canada.ca/en/aviation.
    (4) You may view this service information at the FAA,
Airworthiness Products Section, Operational Safety Branch, 2200
South 216th Street, Des Moines, WA. For information on the
availability of this material at the FAA, call<PHONE_NUMBER>.
    (5) You may view this service information that is incorporated
by reference at the National Archives and Records Administration
(NARA). For information on the availability of this material at
NARA, email [email protected], or go to: www.archives.gov/federal-register/cfr/ibr-locations.html.

    Issued on March 24, 2023.
Christina Underwood,
Acting Director, Compliance & Airworthiness Division, Aircraft
Certification Service.
[FR Doc. 2023-06492 Filed 3-29-23; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910-13-P


[Federal Register Volume 79, Number 56 (Monday, March 24, 2014)]
[Notices]
[Pages 15988-15989]
[FR Doc No: 2014-06311]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission

[Project No. 2590-059]

Consolidated Water Power Company; Notice of Application Accepted
for Filing and Soliciting Comments, Motions To Intervene, and Protests

    Take notice that the following hydroelectric application has been
filed with the Commission and is available for public inspection:
    a. Application Type: Change in Land Rights.
    b. Project No: 2590-059.
    c. Date Filed: January 29, 2014.

    d. Applicant: Consolidated Water Power Company.
    e. Name of Project: Whiting Hydroelectric Project.
    f. Location: Wisconsin River in Portage County, Wisconsin.
    g. Filed Pursuant to: Federal Power Act, 16 U.S.C. 791a-825r.
    h. Applicant Contact: Thomas J. Witt, 610 High Street, P.O. Box
8050, Wisconsin Rapids, WI 54495-8050,<PHONE_NUMBER>.
    i. FERC Contact: Jon Cofrancesco at<PHONE_NUMBER>, or email:
<EMAIL_ADDRESS>    j. Deadline for filing comments, motions to intervene, and
protests: April 14, 2014.
    All documents may be filed electronically via the Internet. See 18
CFR 385.2001(a)(1)(iii) and the instructions on the Commission's Web
site at http://www.ferc.gov/docs-filing/efiling.asp. Commenters can
submit brief comments up to 6,000 characters, without prior
registration, using the eComment system at http://www.ferc.gov/docs-filing/ecomment.asp. You must include your name and contact information
at the end of your comments. For assistance, please contact FERC Online
Support at<EMAIL_ADDRESS>or toll free at 1-866-208-3676,
or for TTY,<PHONE_NUMBER>. Although the Commission strongly encourages
electronic filing, documents may also be paper-filed. To paper-file,
mail an original and seven copies to: Secretary, Federal Energy
Regulatory Commission, 888 First Street NE., Washington, DC 20426.
Please include the project number (P-2590-059) on any comments,
motions, or recommendations filed.
    The Commission's Rules of Practice and Procedure require all
intervenors filing documents with the Commission to serve a copy of
that document on each person whose name appears on the official service
list for the project. Further, if an intervenor files comments or
documents with the Commission relating to the merits of an issue that
may affect the responsibilities of a particular resource agency, they
must also serve a copy of the document on that resource agency.
    k. Description of Request: Consolidated Water Power Company
(licensee) requests Commission approval to transfer certain interests
in licensee-owned lands within the project boundary to New Page
Wisconsin System, Inc. (New Page) to memorialize historic uses of the
property by a paper company, currently owned by New Page, for continued
use of the property by existing paper mill facilities and operations.
The application would separate and more precisely delineate the
licensee's hydropower and utility assets from New Page's paper mill
assets. The proposed change in land rights does not involve any changes
in project facilities, operations, or project boundaries.
    l. Locations of the Application: A copy of the application is
available for inspection and reproduction at the Commission's Public
Reference Room, located at 888 First Street NE., Room 2A, Washington,
DC 20426, or by calling<PHONE_NUMBER>. This filing may also be viewed
on the Commission's Web site at http://www.ferc.gov using the
``eLibrary'' link. Enter the docket number excluding the last three
digits in the docket number field (P-2590) to access the document. You
may also register online at http://www.ferc.gov/docs-filing/esubscription.asp to be notified via email of new filings and issuances
related to this or other pending projects. For assistance, call 1-866-
208-3676 or email<EMAIL_ADDRESS>for TTY, call (202) 502-
8659. A copy is also available for inspection and reproduction at the
address in item (h) above. Agencies may obtain copies of the
application directly from the applicant.
    m. Individuals desiring to be included on the Commission's mailing
list should so indicate by writing to the Secretary of the Commission.
    n. Comments, Protests, or Motions to Intervene: Anyone may submit
comments, a protest, or a motion to intervene in accordance with the
requirements of Rules of Practice and Procedure, 18 CFR 385.210, .211,
.214, respectively. In determining the appropriate action to take, the
Commission will consider all protests or other comments filed, but only
those who file a motion to intervene in accordance with the
Commission's Rules may become a party to the proceeding. Any comments,
protests, or motions to intervene must be received on or before the
specified comment date for the particular application.
    o. Filing and Service of Documents: Any filing must (1) bear in all
capital letters the title ``COMMENTS'', ``PROTEST'', or ``MOTION TO
INTERVENE'' as applicable; (2) set forth in the heading the name of the
applicant and the project number of the application to which the filing
responds; (3) furnish the name, address, and telephone number of the
person commenting, protesting or intervening; and (4) otherwise comply
with the requirements of 18 CFR 385.2001 through 385.2005. All
comments, motions to intervene, or protests must set forth their
evidentiary basis. Any filing made by an intervenor must be accompanied
by proof of service on all persons listed in the service list prepared
by the Commission in this proceeding, in accordance with 18 CFR
385.2010.

    Dated: March 14, 2014.
Kimberly D. Bose,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2014-06311 Filed 3-21-14; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6717-01-P


[Federal Register Volume 86, Number 31 (Thursday, February 18, 2021)]
[Notices]
[Pages 10115-10116]
[FR Doc No: 2021-03305]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY

Federal Emergency Management Agency

[Internal Agency Docket No. FEMA-4568-DR; Docket ID FEMA-2021-0001]

North Carolina; Amendment No. 1 to Notice of a Major Disaster
Declaration

AGENCY: Federal Emergency Management Agency, DHS.

ACTION: Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: This notice amends the notice of a major disaster declaration
for the State of North Carolina (FEMA-4568-DR), dated October 14, 2020,
and related determinations.

DATES: This amendment was issued January 13, 2021.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Dean Webster, Office of Response and
Recovery, Federal Emergency Management Agency, 500 C Street SW,
Washington, DC 20472,<PHONE_NUMBER>.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The notice of a major disaster declaration
for the State of North Carolina is hereby amended to include the
following area among those areas determined to have been adversely
affected by the event declared a major disaster by the President in his
declaration of October 14, 2020.

    Lenoir County for Public Assistance.

    The following Catalog of Federal Domestic Assistance Numbers
(CFDA) are to be used for reporting and drawing funds: 97.030,
Community Disaster Loans; 97.031, Cora Brown Fund; 97.032, Crisis
Counseling; 97.033, Disaster Legal Services; 97.034, Disaster
Unemployment Assistance (DUA); 97.046, Fire Management Assistance
Grant; 97.048, Disaster Housing Assistance to Individuals and
Households In Presidentially Declared Disaster Areas; 97.049,
Presidentially Declared Disaster Assistance--Disaster Housing
Operations for Individuals and Households; 97.050 Presidentially
Declared Disaster Assistance to Individuals and Households--Other
Needs; 97.036, Disaster Grants--Public Assistance (Presidentially
Declared Disasters); 97.039, Hazard Mitigation Grant.

Robert J. Fenton,
Senior Official Performing the Duties of the Administrator, Federal
Emergency Management Agency.
[FR Doc. 2021-03305 Filed 2-17-21; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 9111-23-P