                             SUPPORTING STATEMENT
      NSPS for New Residential Hydronic Heaters and Forced-Air Furnaces
                        (40 CFR Part 60, Subpart QQQQ)

PART A
1.0 	Identification of the Information Collection
(a)	Title of the Information Collection.
	The title of the Information Collection Request (ICR) is NSPS for New Residential Hydronic Heaters and Forced-Air Furnaces (40 CFR Part 60, Subpart QQQQ) (Final Rule). This is a new ICR, and the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) tracking number is 2442.02, Office of Management and Budget (OMB) Control Number 2060-0693.
(b)	Short Characterization.
	This ICR covers information collection requirements in the final rule, New Source Performance Standards (NSPS) for new residential hydronic heaters and forced-air furnaces (40 CFR part 60, subpart QQQQ (subpart QQQQ)). The information collected will be used by the EPA and delegated state and local agencies to determine the compliance status of sources subject to the rule. A residential hydronic heater is defined as a fuel burning device designed to burn wood or wood pellet fuel for the purpose of heating building space and/or water through the distribution, typically through pipes, of a fluid heated in the device, typically water or a water and antifreeze mixture. A residential forced-air furnace is defined as a fuel burning device designed to burn wood or wood pellet fuel that warms spaces other than the space where the furnace is located, by the distribution of air heated by the furnace through ducts.
	The residential hydronic heater and forced-air furnace NSPS is based on similar design principles as the NSPS for new residential wood heaters (40 CFR part 60, subpart AAA). These NSPS establish a certification program instead of the usual NSPS requirement that each affected facility demonstrate compliance with emission limits through performance testing. Under this certification program, a single wood-heating appliance is tested to demonstrate compliance with particulate matter (PM) emission limits for an entire model line which could consist of thousands of stoves. The use of a certification approach significantly reduces the compliance burden, including information collection, for the manufacturers of hydronic heaters and forced-air furnaces. In order to minimize risks to the environment from intentional or accidental misuse of the certification approach, subpart QQQQ also includes several safeguards, some of which entail reporting and recordkeeping.
      There are approximately 30 hydronic heater manufacturers, 7 forced-air furnace manufacturers and 4 laboratories (inclusive of both test labs and third-party certifiers) that would be subject to the final rule. Under subpart QQQQ, hydronic heater and forced-air furnace manufacturers, testing laboratories, and third-party certifiers are required to submit reports to the EPA and to maintain records for demonstrating compliance with the NSPS. The information supplied by the manufacturer to the EPA is used: (1) to ensure that the best system of emission reduction is being applied to reduce emissions from hydronic heaters and forced-air furnaces; (2) to ensure that the appliance tested for certification purposes is in compliance with the applicable emission standards; (3) to provide assurance that non-tested production model appliances have emission performance characteristics similar to tested models; and (4) to provide an indicator of continued compliance. Information supplied to the EPA by testing laboratories and third-party certifiers is used to grant or deny laboratory accreditation and to assist in enforcement and compliance activities. Information supplied to the EPA by testing laboratories and certifying bodies/entities is used to grant or deny laboratory accreditation, assure continued test lab proficiency and to assist in enforcement and compliance activities.
      Subpart QQQQ does not require any reporting or recordkeeping requirements on hydronic heater or forced-air furnace owners or operators. However, the final rule specifies a list of prohibited fuel types and prohibited operations, as well as good operating and good burning practices (which are required to be included in the owner's manual for certified models) that owners and operators are directed to follow when installing and operating their heating appliances.
      The phased implementation schedule of the final rule along with the two-step PM emission standards approach (with phased compliance dates) results in differing recordkeeping and reporting impacts. For purposes of the supporting statement, we refer to these steps as Step 1 and Step 2. The compliance date for meeting Step 1 emission standards provided in the rule occurs in 2015, and the compliance date for meeting Step 2 emission standards provided in the rule occurs in 2020. The recordkeeping and reporting burden cost estimates as a result of the subpart QQQQ final rule for years 2018 to 2020 are presented in a memo to the docket. The recordkeeping and reporting burden estimates included in this supporting statement are for years 2015 to 2017 and the burden estimates outlined in the memo for years 2018 to 2020 are both included in cost impacts estimates included in a memo in the docket for the final rule.
      The estimated burden to the "Affected Public" is listed in Table 1, "Three-Year and Annual Respondent Burden and Cost of Reporting and Recordkeeping Requirements of the Final Rule." The federal government burden associated with the review of reports submitted by respondents is shown in Table 2, "Three-Year and Annual Burden and Cost to the Federal Government of the Final Rule." (Tables 1 and 2 are located at the end of this supporting statement.) We do not anticipate any reporting or recordkeeping burden for state, local or tribal entities because we have only delegated ability to enforce the standards for residential hydronic heaters and forced-air furnaces sold or operated in their region. Under subpart QQQQ, partial delegations shall not include:
      (1) Decisions on certification;
      (2) Revocation of certification;
      (3) Standards;
      (4) Test methods;
      (5) Laboratory and third-party certifier approvals and revocations;
      (6) Enforcing provisions governing content of owner's manuals; and
      (7) Hearings and appeals procedures.
	The information collection requirements for new sources subject to the NSPS for Residential Hydronic Heaters and Forced-Air Furnaces are listed in Attachment 1.
2.	Need For and Use of the Collection
(a)	Need/Authority for the Collection.
	The EPA is charged under section 111 of the Clean Air Act (CAA), as amended, to establish standards of performance for new stationary sources that reflect: ". . . application of the best system of emission reduction which (taking into consideration the cost of achieving such reduction and any non-air quality health and environmental impact and energy requirements) the Administrator determines has been adequately demonstrated. Section 111(a)(l). The agency refers to this charge as selecting the "best system of emission reduction." Section 111 also requires that the Administrator review and, if appropriate, revise such standards every 8 years. Wood burning hydronic heaters and forced-air furnaces are part of the residential wood heating source category, pollutant emissions from which cause or contribute to air pollution that may reasonably be anticipated to endanger public health or welfare, in the Administrator's judgment. As part of the review process, the EPA has decided to expand the types of appliances regulated under the residential wood heating source category to include hydronic heaters and forced-air furnaces. Therefore, the NSPS was promulgated for these appliances at 40 CFR part 60,
subpart QQQQ.
	The records and reports required under subpart QQQQ are necessary for the Administrator to confirm the compliance status of new residential hydronic heaters and forced-air furnaces sold in the United States. These recordkeeping and reporting requirements are specifically authorized by CAA section 114.
(b)	Practical Utility//Users of the Data.
	The control of pollution from new residential hydronic heaters and forced-air furnaces relies on the reduction of particulate matter emissions by proper appliance design. A representative unit for each model line is subjected to a certification test for particulate matter emissions for a range of operating conditions. The manufacturer also contracts with a third-party certifier, which reviews the test reports and quality assurance (QA) plan, and conducts periodic QA audits to ensure that hydronic heaters and forced-air furnaces manufactured subsequent to the initial certification test continue to comply with the NSPS. Manufacturers must renew or recertify their model lines every 5 years or when they make changes to the model line that would exceed specified parameters.
      The required certification test notification is used to inform the EPA when a new model line is expected to be tested. The EPA may then observe the testing, if desired. Emission test reports are needed as these are the EPA's record of a model line's initial capability to comply with the emission standard, and serve as a record of the operating conditions under which compliance was achieved. The EPA compliance audit tests and QA annual audit reports are necessary to ensure continued compliance with the emission standards.
      Adequate recordkeeping and reporting are necessary to ensure compliance with these standards as required by the CAA. The information collected from recordkeeping and reporting requirements is also used for targeting inspections and is of sufficient quality to be used as evidence in court.
3.	Non-duplication, Consultations, and Other Collection Criteria
(a)	Non-duplication.
      A computer search of the EPA's ongoing ICRs revealed no duplication of information-gathering efforts.
      Similar requirements to this NSPS are found in the requirements to 40 CFR part 60, subpart AAA, the NSPS for Residential Wood Heaters. Subpart AAA has a separate ICR undergoing OMB review. Although the requirements are similar, they are not duplicative because they apply to separate groups of appliances and their associated manufacturers. In the case of test laboratories and third-party certifiers, similar accreditation requirements are found in both subparts (40 CFR part 60, subparts AAA and QQQQ), but each has different test methods. Therefore, the requirements under each of these subparts are not duplicative because separate accreditation is required for each test method.
(b)	Public Notice Required Prior to ICR Submission to OMB.
	The preamble to the proposed rule (79 FR 6330, February 3, 2014) provided public notice of the proposed ICR. The EPA considered comments (see Docket ID No. EPA-HQ-OAR-2009-0734) when preparing this revised ICR. The preamble to the final rule provides public notice on this revised ICR.
(c)	Consultations.
      The final rule was developed using information obtained during extensive consultation with individual companies, trade associations and state agencies. Several of the key non-EPA persons consulted on the information collection activities are identified in Table 3. Additional meetings and contacts are documented in the project docket for this final rule, Docket No. EPA-HQ-OAR-2009-0734.
                 TABLE 3. PERSONS CONSULTED ON THE INFORMATION
                             COLLECTION ACTIVITIES
                                    Contact
                                 Organization
                               Telephone Number
Dennis Brazier
Central Boiler

John Crouch
Hearth, Patio, Barbecue Association (HPBA)
916.536.2390
Rick Curkeet
Intertek Testing Services
608.836.4400
Alice Edwards
Alaska Dept. Of Environmental Conservation
907.465.5105
Chuck Gagnor
Northwest Manufacturing

Stephen Hartsfield
National Tribal Air Association
505.242.2175
Frank Moore
Hardy Manufacturing
601.656.5866
Ben Myren
Myren Consulting, Inc.
509.684.1154
Scott Nichols
Tarm Biomass

Lisa Rector
Northeast States for Coordinated Air Use Measurement (NESCAUM)
617.259.2095

Rod Tinnemore
Washington State Department of Ecology
360.407.6978

(d)	Effects of Less Frequent Collection.
	Less frequent information collection would decrease the margin of assurance that manufacturers are producing residential hydronic heaters and forced-air furnaces that (1) pass the initial certification test, and (2) continue to be manufactured in a way that ensures continuous compliance with the emission standards. If the information required by these standards were collected less frequently, the likelihood of detecting violations would be reduced.
(e)	General Guidelines.
      None of the guidelines in 5 CFR 1320.6 is being exceeded, with the exception of the requirement to retain records for 5 years (which exceeds the guideline requirement that records not be required to be retained for more than 3 years). The basis for the 5-year record retention is due to required emission standard model certifications being valid for 5 years prior to the need for renewal or recertification. During this time, the EPA needs to require the retention of model certification tests and QA compliance documentation to support initial and continued compliance with model certifications (e.g., certification tests, QA emissions tests, QA audit reports, biennial reports).
(f)	Confidentiality.
	All information submitted to the agency for which a claim of confidentiality is made will be safeguarded according to the EPA regulations set forth in 40 CFR 2.201 et seq., Chapter 1, Part 2, Subpart B -- Confidentiality of Business Information.
(g)	Sensitive Questions.
	This section is not applicable because this ICR does not involve matters of a sensitive nature.
4.	The Respondents and the Information Requested
(a)	Respondents/NAICS Codes.
      Potential respondents under subpart QQQQ are manufacturers of new residential hydronic heaters and forced-air furnaces. The North American Industry Classification System (NAICS) code for residential hydronic heating manufacturing facilities is 333414, Heating Equipment (Except for Warm Air Furnace Manufacturing). The NAICS code for forced-air furnaces is 333415, Air-Conditioning and Warm Air Heating Equipment and Commercial and Industrial Refrigeration Equipment Manufacturing. Subpart QQQQ also applies to laboratories that conduct or plan to conduct hydronic heater and forced-air furnace certification tests (referred herein as testing labs) and laboratories that plan to become third-party certifiers (referred herein as third-party certifiers) for manufacturers. The NAICS code for testing laboratories is 541380.
(b) Information Requested.
	(i) Data Items, Including Recordkeeping Requirements. In this ICR, all the data recorded or reported is required by the NSPS for New Residential Hydronic Heaters and Forced-air Furnaces (40 CFR Part 60, subpart QQQQ). The reporting requirements for NSPS
subpart QQQQ were uniquely designed for the manufacturers, third-party certifiers and testing laboratories. The records required by this regulation must be retained by the manufacturer, third-party certifier and/or test laboratory for 5 years. A special table is attached that describes the reporting and recordkeeping requirements. See Attachment 1.
      (ii) Respondent Activities. The respondent activities that will be required by the final rule are identified in Table 1 (located at the end of this supporting statement) and introduced in section 6(a).
5.	The Information Collected - Agency Activities, Collection Methodology and Information Management
(a)	Agency Activities.
	Attachment 2 is a summary of the reporting and recordkeeping requirements for the federal government. The agency activities associated with the final rule are provided in Table 2 (located at the end of this supporting statement) and are introduced in section 6(c).
(b)	Collection Methodology and Management.
      All reports are sent directly to the EPA electronically. Data obtained from reports submitted and records maintained by the respondents will be used in compliance and enforcement programs. Portions of the data obtained will be entered into a special database program maintained exclusively by the EPA and some of the data will be made available to the public on an EPA website.
      The EPA provides public access to the list of certified appliances and their emissions ratings on line at http://www.epa.gov/compliance/resources/publications/monitoring/caa/woodstoves/certifiedwood.pdf.
(c)	Small Entity Flexibility.
      Most of the manufacturers, laboratories and commercial owners affected by the final rule are considered small businesses based on the definition used by the Small Business Administration. Additional efforts were taken by the EPA to reduce the burden imposed on the small businesses affected by this regulation. For instance, we have included provisions that allow models with existing certifications that meet Step 1 emission standards that meet specified (conditional) criteria to be automatically certified until the Step 2 emission standards effective date (2020). We believe that allowing this automatic conditional certification approval and including phased compliance dates in the final rule allows additional time for sources to come into compliance and helps to reduce the burden on small businesses by spreading out research and development (R&D) costs over several years. The final rule also includes QA program requirements that align with existing safety QA procedures, thus avoiding duplicative procedures. Additionally, the final rule allows currently EPA-accredited testing laboratories to be allowed to test as approved testing labs for subpart QQQQ for three years after the effective date of the rule. For forced-air furnaces, we have also deferred implementation of the requirement that third-party certifiers be accredited under subpart QQQQ until 6 months after the effective date of the final rule.
(d)	Collection Schedule.
	The specific frequency for each information collection activity within this request is shown in Table 1 for new residential hydronic heaters and forced-air furnaces, which is located at the end of this supporting statement.
6.	Estimating the Burden and Cost of the Collection
(a)	Estimating Respondent Burden.
	The annual recordkeeping and reporting respondent burden estimates for subpart QQQQ are shown in Table 1, located at the end of this section. These numbers were derived from estimates based on EPA's experience with implementing existing subpart AAA rule and other rules, and the EPA voluntary hydronic heater program.
(b)	Estimating Respondent Costs.
	(i) Estimating Labor Costs. Loaded labor rates have been calculated for 2013. We used May 2013 labor rates from the Bureau of Labor Statistics for the Ventilation, Heating, Air-Conditioning and Commercial Refrigeration Equipment Manufacturing (NAICS 333400). Loading factors (i.e., fringe benefits and overhead rates) were calculated using methodologies referenced in promulgated regulations and their accompanying ICRs, particularly those used in New Source Review regulations. Fringe benefits are calculated as 29 percent of hourly earnings, and overhead is calculated using a standard 110 percent above hourly earnings. Table 4 presents the labor rates used in the cost analysis.
                       Table 4. 2013 LOADED LABOR RATES
Labor Category
                            Hourly earnings [$2013]
                                    Fringe
                                   Overhead
                        Loaded 2013 Hourly Earnings ($)
Professional specialty and technical
                                                                          31.53
                                                                           1.29
                                                                            2.1
                                                                        $85.41
Executive, admin, managerial
                                                                          54.89
                                                                           1.29
                                                                            2.1
                                                                       $148.70
Admin support
                                                                          18.22
                                                                           1.29
                                                                            2.1
                                                                        $49.36

      (ii) Estimating Capital and Operations and Maintenance (O&M) Costs. In this section we provide estimated capital costs and one-time start-up costs associated with complying with the NSPS over the 3-year ICR clearance period. These costs are summarized in Table 5 at the end of this section. Estimated capital costs included in Table 5 include fixed capital cost estimates provided by an analysis prepared by Ferguson, Andors & Company for the Hearth, Patio and Barbecue Association. See the manufacturer costs impacts memo and the unit cost memo for more information on assumptions used in this section.
      As discussed in the manufacturer costs impacts memo, we estimate that there are currently 50 model lines of forced-air furnaces produced by 7 manufacturers and 120 model lines of hydronic heaters (about 10 percent of which are indoor hydronic heaters) produced by 30 manufacturers. We assume that of these 170 existing model lines, 47 models (approximately 5 forced air furnace models and 42 hydronic heater models) will meet EPA criteria as meeting
Step 1 emission standards and will qualify for conditional certification approval until 2020 and will not have to undergo certification testing during the three-year ICR period (2015-2017). We assume that a like number of models to replace existing models that currently do not meet the Step 1 emission standards (approximately 115 models (45 forced air furnace models and 70 hydronic heater models)) will be developed/tested and will apply to certify to meet Step 1 emission standards or Step 2 emission standards and would be required by the NSPS to arrange for certification testing during the three-year ICR period (2015-2017) at a cost of $55,000 per test (assumes EPA testing costs of $30,000, full safety cost of $22,500 and $2,500 in shipping costs).
      The final rule requires a permanent label on each hydronic heater and forced-air furnace model, just as required under subpart AAA. To estimate the costs of permanent labels, we assumed the capital costs to be $1,250 per model certified (including those with conditional certification) and that all new models produced by manufacturers (170; 120 outdoor hydronic heater models, 50 forced-air furnace models) produced by all manufacturers will have a permanent label affixed. These costs are consistent with cost estimates provided in Ferguson's analysis.
      The final NSPS requires that each hydronic heater and forced-air furnace offered for sale by a commercial owner be accompanied by an owner's manual that contains specified installation and operation and maintenance information required to be followed to minimize emissions. We have assumed an average fixed cost of $3,750 for owner's manual (revised or new, possibly bilingual) per model, assuming 170 model owner's manuals will need to be developed/revised to include subpart QQQQ requirements. These costs are consistent with cost estimates provided in Ferguson's analysis.
      The final rule includes the requirement for a QA program whereby the manufacturer contracts with a third-party certifier to conduct QA audits. The third-party certifier will be required to conduct regular (at least annual), unannounced audits (and prepare a report for submission to the EPA) of each certified model line to ensure that the manufacturer's QA plan is implemented properly. For purposes of this ICR, we assume that the contracted third-party certifier will require one QA performance test and two QA audits for each of the hydronic heater and forced-air furnace manufacturers (37 manufacturers) under the QA program between 2015 and 2017.
      Another category of capital costs includes costs that would be incurred if the EPA requests a compliance audit, which would be infrequent and sporadic. Under the final rule, we anticipate EPA conducting one audit test for one model that would affect one manufacturer during the period covered by this ICR (2015-2017). Costs assume the cost of one appliance (based on the average cost of three appliances:1 outdoor ($11,571) and 1 indoor ($11,543) hydronic heater and 1 forced-air furnace ($2,579)), plus $55,000 for one test (assumes EPA testing costs of $30,000, full safety cost of $22,500 and $2,500 in shipping costs).
      The last category of capital costs relates to ISO accreditation costs for test labs and third-party certifiers seeking accreditation (at a cost of $75,000/accreditation).

             TABLE 5. ESTIMATED CAPITAL/START-UP COSTS FOR 3-YEAR
                         CLEARANCE PERIOD (2015-2017)
                                      (A)
                                      (B)
                                      (C)
                                      (D)
                            Data Collection Device
                   Capital/Start-Up for One Respondent/Unit
                    Number of New Respondents/Models/Units
                          Total Capital/Start-Up Cost

                                    (B X C)
Certification Test [a]
                            $55,000 per respondent
                                  115 models
                                  $6,325,000
Cost of Permanent Label [b]
                               $1,250 per model
                                  170 models
                                   $212,500
QA Performance Test [c]
                            $55,000 per respondent
                                37 respondents
                                  $2,035,000
EPA Compliance Audit Test [d]
                            $63,564 per respondent
                                 1 respondent
                                    $63,564
Owner's Manual[e]
                               $3,750 per model
                                  170 models
                                   $637,500
ISO Accreditation  -  Test Laboratories[f]
                            $75,000 per respondent
                                 2 respondents
                                   $150,000
ISO Accreditation  -  Third-Party Certifiers[g]
                            $75,000 per respondent
                                 2 respondents
                                   $150,000
Total

                                  $9,573,564
Annual Average

                                  $3,191,188
  [a] Models certified by testing per manufacturer: Assumes that 42% of existing hydronic heater models (.42 X 120 models = 50) and 10% of existing forced air furnace models (.10 X 50 models= 5) will not need to test to certify to meet limits during the three-year ICR period (2015-2017). We assume that manufacturers will test (at a cost of $55,000 per test (includes EPA testing ($30,000), confirmation safety testing or full safety testing ($22,500), and shipping of prototype(s)($2,500) costs)) and apply to meet either Step 1 emission standards or Step 2 emission standard for 115 models (70 hydronic heater and 45 forced-air furnace models) during the three year ICR period (2015-2017) in order to replace old models that will not meet the 2015 and 2016/2017 (for forced-air furnaces) compliance emission standards.
  [b] Total costs of permanent labels are estimated to be $1,250 per model (170 models) (2015-2017).
  [c] Assumes each of the manufacturers (37 manufacturers) will be required to test one of their models under their QA program during the period covered by this ICR (2015-2017) at $55,000 per test ( includes EPA testing ($30,000), confirmation safety testing or full safety testing ($22,500), and shipping of prototype(s)($2,500) costs).
  [d] Assumes one model line will be audited by EPA during the three-year ICR period (2015  -  2017). Costs assume the cost of one appliance (based on the average cost of three appliances: 1 outdoor ($11,571) and 1 indoor ($11,543) hydronic heater and 1 forced-air furnace ($2,579)) plus the cost of testing at $55,000 (assumes EPA testing costs of $30,000, full safety cost of $22,500 and $2,500 in shipping costs).
  e Assumes an average fixed cost of $3,750 for owner's manual (revised or new, possibly bilingual) per model certified (assumes 170 model lines from 37 manufacturers).
  [f] Assumes all test labs will be ISO accredited (that are going to choose be accredited) before 2018, a total of four labs between 2015 and 2017 and 0 occurrences between 2018 and 2020. We assume an average cost to obtain ISO accreditation is $75,000 based on cost estimates provided by manufacturers.
  [g] Assumes all third-party certifiers will be ISO accredited (that are going to choose be accredited) before 2018, a total of four labs between 2015 and 2017 and 0 occurrences between 2018 and 2020. We assume an average cost to obtain ISO accreditation is $75,000 based on cost estimates provided by manufacturers.
	(iii) Annualizing Capital Costs. The total annual capital/start-up costs are estimated to average $3,191,188 over the period of this ICR (2015-2017).
(c)	Estimating Agency Burden and Cost.
	The major costs to the EPA are those costs associated with reviewing applications for model certifications, testing lab and third-party certifier accreditations, and ongoing compliance verification QA functions. This is consistent with the overall EPA compliance and enforcement program, which includes activities such as the examination of records maintained by the respondents, periodic inspection of sources of emissions and the publication and distribution of collected information.
      The average annual agency cost during the 3 years of the ICR is estimated to be $28,630. See Table 2, located at the end of this supporting statement.
	The agency labor rates are from the Office of Personnel Management 2014 General Schedule which excludes locality rates of pay. These rates can be obtained from Salary Table 2014-GS available on the OPM website, http://www.opm.gov/policy-data-oversight/pay-leave/salaries-wages/salary-tables/pdf/2014/salhrl.pdf. The government employee labor rates are $15.78/hour for clerical (GS-6, Step 3), $29.17 for technical (GS-12, Step 1) and $39.31/hr for management (GS-13, Step 5). These rates were increased by 60 percent to include fringe benefits and overhead. The fully-burdened wage rates used to represent agency labor costs are: clerical at $25.25; technical at $46.67 and management at $62.90.
(d)	Estimating the Respondent Universe and Total Burden and Costs.
      Subpart QQQQ requires hydronic heater and forced-air furnace manufacturers, test laboratories and third-party certifiers to submit reports to the EPA and/or to maintain records for demonstrating and documenting compliance with the NSPS. A third-party certification process is required under subpart QQQQ. Under this process, for all heaters/stoves subject to subpart QQQQ, after testing is completed by an approved test laboratory, a certification of conformity with the particulate matter emissions standards must be issued by a third-party certifier with whom the manufacturer has entered into contract for certification services. To avoid the potential for manufacturer model certification delays (and the potential for lost revenues), we are allowing automatic conditional certification for hydronic heaters and forced-air furnaces that meet Step 1 emission standards until the Step 2 emission standards compliance date (2020).
      The third-party certifier is an independent third-party that is ISO accredited to perform certifications, inspections and audits by an accreditation body. The third-party certifier can certify conformity if the emission tests have been conducted per the appropriate guidelines; the test report is complete and accurate; the instrumentation used for the test was properly calibrated; the test report shows that the representative hydronic heater or forced-air furnace meets the applicable emission standards; and the QA plan prepared by the manufacturer is adequate to ensure that units within the model line will be similar in all material respects that would affect emissions to the wood heater submitted for certification testing. The third-party certifier is also required to conduct regular (at least annual) unannounced audits to ensure that the manufacturer's QA plan is being implemented and must prepare a report for each audit that fully documents the results of the audit. The manufacturer must include in its contract with the third-party certifier the authorization and requirement to submit all such reports to the Administrator. The ISO accreditation and approval to be third-party certifiers will be required on the effective date for hydronic heaters and 6 months after the effective date of the rule for forced-air furnaces. We have assumed that two laboratories will be ISO-accredited and will apply to be third-party certifiers and two will seek to obtain accreditation and will apply to be third-party certifiers during the three-year ICR period (2015-2017).
      Test laboratories that want to become approved test laboratories to conduct NSPS certification testing will need to apply for ISO accreditation as a test laboratory, conduct proficiency testing and report the results of all such testing. Accredited approved test laboratories must maintain records of all certification tests, proficiency tests and compliance audit test data. Approved test laboratories must be approved for hydronic heater and forced air furnace certification under subpart QQQQ or must be an independent third-party test laboratory that is accredited by a nationally recognized accrediting entity to perform testing using the test methods specified in subpart QQQQ. The final rule allows a three-year extension of current EPA accreditations of labs (as approved test laboratories). Laboratories not currently EPA-accredited will be required (as of the date 6 months after the effective date of the final rule) to register their credentials with the EPA and be approved by the EPA prior to conducting any certification testing or related work used as a basis for compliance with subpart QQQQ. Of the 4 labs, we assume that 2 will have ISO accreditation as test laboratories by the effective date of the final rule and 2 will obtain ISO accreditation as test laboratories during the three-year period covered by this ICR (2015-2017).
      This ICR assumes that there is an overlap of laboratories that will obtain accreditation and approval as approved testing laboratories and as third-party certifiers under subpart QQQQ. The only subpart QQQQ final rule testing laboratory and third-party certifier recordkeeping and reporting burden costs not passed on to the manufacturer would be the burden associated with obtaining ISO accreditation, proficiency testing and reporting required for approved test laboratories to maintain accreditation and approval as test labs, and specified recordkeeping requirements (e.g., certification tests, proficiency tests, QA program inspections, audit test results).
      There are an estimated 37 existing manufacturers that will be subject to the Residential Hydronic Heater and Forced-Air Furnace NSPS. We recognize that this value may be high. We obtained information on the number of existing manufacturers by appliance type, which may double count manufacturers that make more than one type of appliance. Also, there seems to be a certain amount of consolidation in the industry. However, the number of new manufacturers, particularly outside of the United States, is unknown. Therefore, we consider the total of 37 manufacturers to be a reasonable estimate of the number of new and existing manufacturers.
      Manufacturers of new hydronic heaters and forced-air devices are required to submit applications for certification of model lines, to submit results of emissions tests conducted to demonstrate that the model lines would comply with the emission standards and produce certified units according to a QA plan approved by an independent third-party certifier. For hydronic heaters, compliance dates with Step 1 and Step 2 emission limits are 2015 and 2020, respectively. For forced-air furnaces, compliance with work practice/operational standards is required in 2015, and compliance with Step 1 emission limits for small (<65,000 BTU/hr models) and large furnaces (> 65,000 BTU/hr models) is required in 2016 and 2017, respectively. The final rule allows hydronic heater/forced-air heater models that meet specified EPA criteria that show compliance with the Step 1 emission standards to be automatically deemed as certified to meet the Step 1 emission standards under this final rule until the Step 2 emission standards compliance date (2020). Manufacturers must submit a notification of the initial test and biennial reports that each certified model line remains unchanged. They must also maintain records of all certification data, maintain results of QA program inspections and emissions test data, and seal and store the tested appliance.
      Manufacturers are also required to apply permanent labels on each applicable unit prior to sale. These labels provide important compliance information to enforcement officials and important information to consumers for purchasing appliances.
      For subpart QQQQ, the components of the total annual responses attributable to this ICR are test notifications, applications for certification, biennial reporting for certified models, applications for accreditation, test report submittals, QA audit reports and test lab proficiency reporting for the 41 respondents (37 manufacturers and 4 testing laboratories (including both approved test laboratories and third-party certifiers)) that will be subject to the rule. The number of total annual responses for subpart QQQQ is estimated at 199.
(e)	Bottom Line Burden Hours and Cost Tables.
      (i) Respondent Tally. The bottom line respondent burden hours and costs for the 3 years (2015-2017) covered by this ICR are presented in Table 1 (located at the end of this supporting statement). The average annual burden for the recordkeeping and reporting requirements in subpart QQQQ for the estimated 37 manufacturers and 4 laboratories (consisting of both third-party certifiers and test laboratories) that will be subject to subpart QQQQ is 2,337 person-hours, with an annual labor average labor cost of $191,904 (approximately $140,000 for manufacturers, $15,000 for third-party certifiers and $36,000 for test laboratories) and annualized capital/start-up costs of $3,191,188.
	(ii) The Agency Tally. The average annual Federal Government cost is $28,630 for 629 hours for subpart QQQQ. The bottom line agency burden hours and costs for the 3 years covered by this ICR are presented in Table 2 (located at the end of this supporting statement).
	(iii) Variations in the Annual Bottom Line. This section does not apply since no significant variation is anticipated.

(f)	Reasons for Change in Burden.
	We are requesting a burden of an estimated 2,337 hours and annualized capital/startup costs of $3,191,188 due to implementation of this new regulation.
(g)	Burden Statement
	The average annual respondent burden for the New Residential Hydronic Heaters and Forced-Air Furnaces NSPS is approximately 57 hours with an average annual burden per response of 12 hours.
      Burden means the total time, effort, or financial resources expended by persons to generate, maintain, retain, or disclose or provide information to or for a Federal agency. This includes the time needed to review instructions; develop, acquire, install, and utilize technology and systems for the purposes of collecting, validating, and verifying information, processing and maintaining information, and disclosing and providing information; adjust the existing ways to comply with any previously applicable instructions and requirements; train personnel to be able to respond to a collection of information; search data sources; complete and review the collection of information; and transmit or otherwise disclose the information.
	An agency may not conduct or sponsor, and a person is not required to respond to, a collection of information unless it displays a currently valid OMB control number. The OMB control numbers for EPA's regulations in 40 CFR part 60 are listed in 40 CFR part 9.
	To comment on the agency's need for this information the accuracy of the provided burden estimates, and any suggestions for minimizing respondent burden, including through the use of automated collection techniques, the EPA has established a public docket for this ICR under Docket ID No. EPA-HQ-OAR-2009-0734, which is available for online viewing at http://www.regulations.gov, or in person viewing at the Air and Radiation Docket and Information Center in the EPA Docket Center (EPA/DC), EPA WJC West Building, Room 3334, 1301 Constitution Ave., NW, Washington, DC. The EPA Docket Center Public Reading Room is open from 8:30 a.m. to 4:30 p.m., Monday through Friday, excluding legal holidays. The telephone number for the Reading Room is<PHONE_NUMBER>, and the telephone number for the EPA Docket is<PHONE_NUMBER>. An electronic version of the public docket is available at http://www.regulations.gov. This site can be used to submit or view public comments, access the index listing of the contents of the public docket, and to access those documents in the public docket that are available electronically. When in the system, select "search," then key in one of the Docket ID Numbers identified above. Also, you can send comments to the Office of Information and Regulatory Affairs, Office of Management and Budget, 725 17[th] Street, NW, Washington, DC 20503, Attention Desk Officer for EPA. Please include the relevant Docket ID Number (EPA-HQ-OAR-2009-0734) and OMB Control Number (2060-NEW) in any correspondence.
PART B
	This section is not applicable because statistical methods are not used in data collection associated with the final rule.

                                 Attachment 1
              Respondent Reporting and Recordkeeping Requirements
NSPS for New Residential Hydronic Heaters and Forced-Air Furnaces (40 CFR part 60, subpart QQQQ)

                             Regulatory Reference
                               Title 40, Part 60
                               Regulated Entity
                      Reporting/Recordkeeping Requirement
                           Frequency/Other Comments
60.5475(b), 60.5475(f)(1)
                                 Manufacturer
Report: Application for a certificate of compliance. Include results of certification test, model identification information, engineering drawings and component specifications (for components that may affect emissions), identification of any CBI (as necessary), warranty information, owner's manual, documentation of  contracts with an approved test laboratory and third-party certifier, quality assurance (QA) program and various affirmations of compliance.
Once for each model line.
60.5475(g)*
                                 Manufacturer
Report: Request for waiver from submitting certification test results.
Once per model, if at all.
60.5475(i)
                                 Manufacturer
Report: Renewal of certification. Renewal of certificate allowed by reapplying or by affirming in writing that the wood heater has been subject to no changes that would impact emissions and requesting a waiver from certification testing.
Must renew or apply for recertification every 5 years.
60.5475(k)**
                                 Manufacturer
Report: Recertification required whenever a change is heater design exceeds specified parameters. May request a waiver with adequate rationale that changes may not reasonably be anticipated to cause wood heaters in the model line to exceed the applicable emission limits.
Variable.
60.5475(m)
                                 Manufacturer
Report: Develop a QA program and submit with application for a certificate of compliance.
Report: Review third-party certifier QA audit report and submit corrective actions for any identified deficiencies.
Once per model line.

Variable.
60.5475(n)**
                                 Manufacturer
Report: EPA compliance audit test results. EPA may select a hydronic heater or forced-air furnace for compliance audit testing. EPA may test or direct the manufacturer to test a selected model line; at manufacturer's expense.
Variable and infrequent.
60.5476(f)
                                 Manufacturer
Report: Notification in advance of compliance certification test.
Once per model line, at least 30 days before the start of testing.
60.5478(a)-(d)
                                 Manufacturer
Produce and apply permanent label.
One per unit produced.
60.5478(e)***
                                 Manufacturer
Optional requirement. Produce and apply temporary label.
Variable/optional.
 Each model that meets 2020 emission limits prior to the 2020 compliance date may display a temporary label indicating that the model meets the 2020 emission limits.
 Each model certified to meet the 2020 cord wood alternative means of emissions limitation compliance option may display that the model meets the 2020 cord wood alternative compliance option.
60.5478(f)
                                 Manufacturer
Develop and publish owner's manual.
One owner's manual developed per model line; a copy accompanies each unit produced.
60.5479(a)
                                 Manufacturer
Maintain records of all certification test data, results of QA program inspections, emission test data.
Once per model for certification and test data. Periodically for all QA inspections and tests.
60.5479(c)
                                 Manufacturer
Retain sealed wood heater for 3 years after the certification test of the model.
One for each certified model.
60.5479(d)
                                 Manufacturer
Report: Certification that model line is unchanged and sales for each model by state.
Every 2 years following issuance of a certificate of compliance for each model line.
60.5479(f)
                                 Manufacturer
Report: Performance test data submitted electronically.
Within 60 days after completion of each performance test.
60.5479(g)
                                 Manufacturer
For each certified model line, post the non-CBI certification test report to the manufacturer's website.
Once for each model lint, within 30 days of receiving the certificate of compliance.
60.5481**
                                 Manufacturer
Various requests, submittals, motions, filings, etc., under hearing and appeal procedures.
Variable and infrequent, if at all.
60.5477(a)
                                Test Laboratory
Report: After being accredited by a nationally recognized accrediting entity, application for EPA approval as a test lab.
Once (unless not renewed every 5 years by the EPA).
60.5477(a), 60.5479(b)
                                Test Laboratory
Report: Proficiency test and documentation. Approved test labs must participate in a biennial proficiency testing program conducted by a nationally recognized accrediting entity. Each approved test laboratory must submit all proficiency test results to the EPA.
Biennially.
60.5479(b)
                                Test Laboratory
Keep records of documentation pertaining to certification tests, QA audit tests, including the full test report and raw data sheets, technician notes, calculations and test results for all test runs.
Once for each certification test, QA audit test.
60.539**
                                Test Laboratory
Various requests, submittals, motions, filings, etc., under hearing and appeal procedures.
Variable and infrequent, if at all.
60.5475(m), 60.5477(e)(2)
                             Third-Party Certifier
Report: Submit report of unannounced QA program audits to EPA and the manufacturer.
At least annually.
60.5477(e)
                             Third-Party Certifier
Report: After being accredited by a nationally recognized accrediting entity, application for EPA approval as a third-party certifier.
Once, to be renewed every 5 years.
60.5479(b)
                             Third-Party Certifier
Keep records of documentation pertaining to certification tests, QA inspections and audit tests, including the full test report and raw data sheets, technician notes, calculations and test results for all test runs.
Once for each certification test, QA inspection and audit test.
60.5479(b)
                             Third-Party Certifier
Each certifier must submit each certification test, QA inspection report and ISO IEC accreditation credentials to the EPA.
Once for each certification test, QA inspection and audit test.
60.539**
                             Third-Party Certifier
Various requests, submittals, motions, filings, etc., under hearing and appeal procedures.
Variable and infrequent, if at all.

* This is associated with an exemption or waiver (which would eliminate other reporting and recordkeeping burdens) and therefore not counted as a burden in the calculation.
** This is not a routine report or is a provision for an extraordinary circumstance and, therefore, is not included in the calculations because it is very unlikely to occur during the next 3 years.
*** This is an optional requirement and, therefore, is not included in the calculated burden estimates.

                                 Attachment 2
               Federal Reporting and Recordkeeping Requirements
NSPS for New Hydronic Heaters and Forced-Air Furnaces (40 CFR part 60, subpart QQQQ)

                             Regulatory Reference
                               Title 40, Part 60
                                    Agency
                            Reporting/Recordkeeping
                           Frequency/Other Comments
60.5475(c)(1) or (2), 60.5475(f)(2) or (3)
                                      EPA
Report: Review application for a certificate of compliance and issue the certificate or a notice of denial.
Once per model.
60.5475(i)(2) or (3)
                                      EPA
Report: Renewal or denial of certificate of compliance.
Every 5 years.
60.5475(l)(2)*
                                      EPA
Report: Notice of revocation of certification.
Variable and infrequent, if at all.
60.5475(n)(1)(ii)
                                      EPA
Report: Notice to manufacturer that a model has been selected for an EPA compliance audit test.
Variable and infrequent.
60.5475(n)(3)*
                                      EPA
Report: Issue notification of suspension or revocation of a model's certification.
Variable and infrequent, if at all.
60.5477(a)
                                      EPA
Report: Review test laboratory application and provide the test laboratory with a certificate of approval if approval criteria are met. If approval not granted, provide written notice with rationale.
Test lab approval (unless revoked sooner) is valid for 5 years from the date of issuance.
60.5477(b)*
                                      EPA
Report: Notice of revocation of test laboratory approval with basis for revocation and notice of opportunity for a hearing.
Variable and infrequent, if at all.
60.5477(e)
                                      EPA
Report: Review of third-party certifier application and provide a certificate of approval if approval criteria met. If approval not granted, provide a written notice with rationale.
Third-party certifier approval expires 5 years after being issued unless renewed.
60.5477(f)*
                                      EPA
Report: Notice of revocation of third-party certifier approval with basis for revocation and notice of opportunity for a hearing.
Variable and infrequent, if at all.
60.5479(b)
                                      EPA
Evaluation of laboratory proficiency tests submitted by test laboratories.
Biennially.
60.5481*
                                      EPA
Various requests, submittals, motions, filings, etc., under hearing and appeal procedures.
Variable and infrequent, if at all.

* This is not a routine occurrence. It is a provision for an extraordinary circumstance and, therefore, is not included in the calculations because it is very unlikely to occur during the next 3 years.


[Federal Register Volume 87, Number 123 (Tuesday, June 28, 2022)]
[Notices]
[Pages 38412-38414]
[FR Doc No: 2022-13752]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES

Food and Drug Administration

[Docket No. FDA-2020-D-1496]

Renal Cell Carcinoma: Developing Drugs and Biologics for Adjuvant
Treatment; Guidance for Industry; Availability

AGENCY: Food and Drug Administration, HHS.

ACTION: Notice of availability.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Food and Drug Administration (FDA or Agency) is announcing
the availability of a final guidance for industry entitled ``Renal Cell
Carcinoma: Developing Drugs and Biologics for Adjuvant Treatment.''
This guidance is intended to facilitate the development of drugs and
biologics for the adjuvant treatment of renal cell carcinoma and
provides recommendations for the sponsor on this topic. The guidance
includes recommendations regarding eligibility criteria, choice of
comparator, followup imaging assessments, determination of disease
recurrence, analyses of disease-free survival, and interpretation of
trial results. This guidance finalizes the draft guidance of the same
title issued on October 2, 2020.

DATES: The announcement of the guidance is published in the Federal
Register on June 28, 2022.

ADDRESSES: You may submit either electronic or written comments on

Agency guidances at any time as follows:

Electronic Submissions

    Submit electronic comments in the following way:
     Federal eRulemaking Portal: https://www.regulations.gov.
Follow the instructions for submitting comments. Comments submitted
electronically, including attachments, to https://www.regulations.gov
will be posted to the docket unchanged. Because your comment will be
made public, you are solely responsible for ensuring that your comment
does not include any confidential information that you or a third party
may not wish to be posted, such as medical information, your or anyone
else's Social Security number, or confidential business information,
such as a manufacturing process. Please note that if you include your
name, contact information, or other information that identifies you in
the body of your comments, that information will be posted on https://www.regulations.gov.
     If you want to submit a comment with confidential
information that you do not wish to be made available to the public,
submit the comment as a written/paper submission and in the manner
detailed (see ``Written/Paper Submissions'' and ``Instructions'').

Written/Paper Submissions

    Submit written/paper submissions as follows:
     Mail/Hand Delivery/Courier (for written/paper
submissions): Dockets Management Staff (HFA-305), Food and Drug
Administration, 5630 Fishers Lane, Rm. 1061, Rockville, MD 20852.
     For written/paper comments submitted to the Dockets
Management Staff, FDA will post your comment, as well as any
attachments, except for information submitted, marked and identified,
as confidential, if submitted as detailed in ``Instructions.''
    Instructions: All submissions received must include the Docket No.
FDA-2020-D-1496 for ``Renal Cell Carcinoma: Developing Drugs and
Biologics for Adjuvant Treatment.'' Received comments will be placed in
the docket and, except for those submitted as ``Confidential
Submissions,'' publicly viewable at https://www.regulations.gov or at
the Dockets Management Staff between 9 a.m. and 4 p.m., Monday through
Friday,<PHONE_NUMBER>.
     Confidential Submissions--To submit a comment with
confidential information that you do not wish to be made publicly
available, submit your comments only as a written/paper submission. You
should submit two copies total. One copy will include the information
you claim to be confidential with a heading or cover note that states
``THIS DOCUMENT CONTAINS CONFIDENTIAL INFORMATION.'' The Agency will
review this copy, including the claimed confidential information, in
its consideration of comments. The second copy, which will have the
claimed confidential information redacted/blacked out, will be
available for public viewing and posted on https://www.regulations.gov.
Submit both copies to the Dockets Management Staff. If you do not wish
your name and contact information to be made publicly available, you
can provide this information on the cover sheet and not in the body of
your comments and you must identify this information as
``confidential.'' Any information marked as ``confidential'' will not
be disclosed except in accordance with 21 CFR 10.20 and other
applicable disclosure law. For more information about FDA's posting of
comments to public dockets, see 80 FR 56469, September 18, 2015, or
access the information at: https://www.govinfo.gov/content/pkg/FR-2015-09-18/pdf/2015-23389.pdf.
    Docket: For access to the docket to read background documents or
the electronic and written/paper comments received, go to https://www.regulations.gov and insert the docket number, found in brackets in
the heading of this document, into the ``Search'' box and follow the
prompts and/or go to the Dockets Management Staff, 5630 Fishers Lane,
Rm. 1061, Rockville, MD 20852,<PHONE_NUMBER>.
    You may submit comments on any guidance at any time (see 21 CFR
10.115(g)(5)).
    Submit written requests for single copies of this guidance to the
Division of Drug Information, Center for Drug Evaluation and Research
(CDER), Food and Drug Administration, 10001 New Hampshire Ave.,
Hillandale Building, 4th Floor, Silver Spring, MD 20993-0002; or to the
Office of Communication, Outreach, and Development, Center for
Biologics Evaluation and Research (CBER), Food and Drug Administration,
10903 New Hampshire Ave., Bldg. 71, Rm. 3128, Silver Spring, MD 20993-
0002. Send one self-addressed adhesive label to assist that office in
processing your requests. See the SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION section for
electronic access to the guidance document.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Sundeep Agrawal, Center for Drug
Evaluation and Research, Food and Drug Administration, 10903 New
Hampshire Ave., Bldg. 22, Rm. 2379, Silver Spring, MD 20993-0002, 240-
402-4683; or Stephen Ripley, Center for Biologics Evaluation and
Research, Food and Drug Administration, 10903 New Hampshire Ave., Bldg.
71, Rm. 7301, Silver Spring, MD 20993,<PHONE_NUMBER>.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

I. Background

    FDA is announcing the availability of a guidance for industry
entitled ``Renal Cell Carcinoma: Developing Drugs and Biologics for
Adjuvant Treatment.'' This guidance provides recommendations to
sponsors regarding the development of drugs regulated by CDER and CBER
for the adjuvant treatment of renal cell carcinoma. The guidance
includes recommendations regarding eligibility criteria, choice of
comparator, followup imaging assessments, determination of disease
recurrence, analyses of disease-free survival (DFS), and interpretation
of trial results. Although FDA may consider endpoints other than DFS
for the adjuvant treatment of renal cell carcinoma, this guidance is
focused on clinical trials with DFS as the primary efficacy endpoint.
    Adjuvant renal cell carcinoma clinical trials are an active area of
research. There is significant variability in the design, conduct, and
analysis of these trials, including the eligibility criteria,
radiological disease assessments, the definition of disease recurrence,
and the date used to define the DFS endpoint. Consistency in these
aspects within and across trials may facilitate interpretation of trial
results. These issues were discussed at an FDA-National Cancer
Institute public workshop held on November 28, 2017. This final
guidance provides recommendations on these issues to facilitate
adjuvant renal cell carcinoma clinical trials. This guidance finalizes
the draft guidance entitled ``Renal Cell Carcinoma: Developing Drugs
and Biologics for Adjuvant Treatment'' issued on October 2, 2020 (85 FR
62310). FDA considered comments received on the draft guidance as the
guidance was finalized. The final guidance includes changes to improve
clarity.
    This guidance is being issued consistent with FDA's good guidance
practices regulation (21 CFR 10.115). The guidance represents the
current thinking of FDA on ``Renal Cell Carcinoma: Developing Drugs and
Biologics for Adjuvant Treatment.'' It does not establish any rights
for any person and is not binding on FDA or the public. You can use an
alternative approach if it satisfies the requirements of the applicable
statutes and regulations.

II. Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995

    While this guidance contains no collection of information, it does
refer to previously approved FDA collections of information. Therefore,
clearance by the Office of Management and Budget (OMB) under the
Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 (PRA) (44 U.S.C. 3501-3521) is not
required for this guidance. The previously approved collections of
information are subject to review by OMB under the PRA. The collections
of information in 21 CFR part 312 have been approved under OMB control
number 0910-0014; the collections of information in 21 CFR part 314
have been approved under OMB control number 0910-0001; and the
collections of information in 21 CFR part 601 have been approved under
OMB control number 0910-0338.

III. Electronic Access

    Persons with access to the internet may obtain the guidance at
https://www.fda.gov/drugs/guidance-compliance-regulatory-information/guidances-drugs, https://www.fda.gov/vaccines-blood-biologics/guidance-compliance-regulatory-information-biologics/biologics-guidances,
https://www.fda.gov/regulatory-information/search-fda-guidance-documents, or https://www.regulations.gov.

    Dated: June 22, 2022.
Lauren K. Roth,
Associate Commissioner for Policy.
[FR Doc. 2022-13752 Filed 6-27-22; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4164-01-P


[Federal Register Volume 82, Number 196 (Thursday, October 12, 2017)]
[Notices]
[Page 47568]
[FR Doc No: 2017-22034]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY

Federal Emergency Management Agency

[Docket ID FEMA-2017-0001]

Notice of Adjustment of Minimum Project Worksheet Amount

AGENCY: Federal Emergency Management Agency, DHS.

ACTION: Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: FEMA gives notice that the minimum Project Worksheet Amount
under the Public Assistance program for disasters and emergencies
declared on or after October 1, 2017, will be increased.

DATES: This adjustment applies to major disasters and emergencies
declared on or after October 1, 2017.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Christopher Logan, Recovery
Directorate, Federal Emergency Management Agency, 500 C Street SW.,
Washington, DC 20472,<PHONE_NUMBER>.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The Robert T. Stafford Disaster Relief and
Emergency Assistance Act 42 U.S.C. 5121-5207 and 44 CFR 206.202(d)(2)
provide that FEMA will annually adjust the minimum Project Worksheet
amount under the Public Assistance program to reflect changes in the
Consumer Price Index for All Urban Consumers published by the
Department of Labor.
    FEMA gives notice of an increase to $3,140 for the minimum amount
that will be approved for any Project Worksheet under the Public
Assistance program for all major disasters and emergencies declared on
or after October 1, 2017.
    FEMA bases the adjustment on an increase in the Consumer Price
Index for All Urban Consumers of 1.9 percent for the 12-month period
that ended in August 2017. This is based on information released by the
Bureau of Labor Statistics at the U.S. Department of Labor on September
14, 2017.

Catalog of Federal Domestic Assistance No. 97.036, Disaster Grants--
Public Assistance (Presidentially Declared Disasters).

Brock Long,
Administrator, Federal Emergency Management Agency.
[FR Doc. 2017-22034 Filed 10-11-17; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 9111-23-P


[Federal Register Volume 79, Number 177 (Friday, September 12, 2014)]
[Notices]
[Pages 54705-54706]
[FR Doc No: 2014-21741]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission

[Project No. 14626-000]

GreenVolt Hydro, LLC; Notice of Preliminary Permit Application
Accepted for Filing and Soliciting Comments, Motions To Intervene, and
Competing Applications

    On June 20, 2014, GreenVolt Hydro, LLC filed an application for a
preliminary permit, pursuant to section 4(f) of the Federal Power Act
(FPA), proposing to study the feasibility of the Two Girls Creek
Hydroelectric Project (project) to be located on Two Girls Creek near
Sweet Home in Linn County, Oregon. The sole purpose of a preliminary
permit, if issued, is to grant the permit holder priority to file a
license application during the permit term. A preliminary permit does
not authorize the permit holder to perform any land-disturbing
activities or otherwise enter upon lands or waters owned by others
without the owners' express permission.
    The proposed project would consist of the following new facilities:
(1) A weir with screened intake; (2) a 19,365-foot-long, 30 to 36-inch-
diameter high density polyethylene (HDPE) penstock; (3) a 50 feet by 40
feet concrete block powerhouse with a single Pelton turbine/generator
unit rated for 5 megawatt at 1,606 feet of net head; (4) a 1,000-foot-
long, 60-inch-diameter HDPE tailrace conduit; (5) an underground 7.2-
mile-long, 12-kilovolt (kV) transmission line connection to an existing
transmission line (the point of interconnection); (6) a 40-feet-wide
right of way access road; and (7) appurtenant facilities. The estimated
annual generation of the project would be 36.87 gigawatt-hours.
    Applicant Contact: Mr. Scott Shankland, Manager, GreenVolt Hydro,
LLC, 52 Galen Street, Lake Oswego, Oregon 97035; phone:<PHONE_NUMBER>.
    FERC Contact: Kim Nguyen; email<EMAIL_ADDRESS>phone: (202)
502-6105.
    Deadline for filing comments, motions to intervene, competing
applications (without notices of intent), or notices of intent to file
competing applications: 60 days from the issuance of this notice.
Competing applications and notices of intent must meet the requirements
of 18 CFR 4.36.
    The Commission strongly encourages electronic filing. Please file
comments, motions to intervene, notices of intent, and competing
applications using the Commission's eFiling system at http://www.ferc.gov/docs-filing/efiling.asp. Commenters can submit brief
comments up to 6,000 characters, without prior registration, using the
eComment system at http://www.ferc.gov/docs-filing/ecomment.asp. You
must include your name and contact information at the end of your
comments. For assistance, please contact FERC Online Support at
<EMAIL_ADDRESS>(866) 208-3676 (toll free), or (202) 502-
8659 (TTY). In lieu of electronic filing, please send a paper copy to:
Secretary, Federal Energy Regulatory Commission, 888 First Street NE.,
Washington, DC 20426. The first page of any filing should include
docket number P-14626-000.
    More information about this project, including a copy of the
application, can be viewed or printed on the ``eLibrary'' link of
Commission's Web site at http://www.ferc.gov/docs-filing/elibrary.asp.
Enter the docket number (P-14626) in the docket number field to access
the document. For assistance, contact FERC Online Support.

    Dated: September 4, 2014.
 Kimberly D. Bose,
 Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2014-21741 Filed 9-11-14; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6717-01-P


[Federal Register: May 12, 2008 (Volume 73, Number 92)]
[Notices]
[Page 26981-26983]
[DOCID:fr12my08-29]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission

[Project No. 12966-001]

Lake Powell Hydroelectric System; Notice of Intent To File
License Application, Filing of Pre-Application Document, Commencement
of Licensing Proceeding, and Scoping; Request for Comments on the Pad
and Scoping Document, and Identification of Issues and Associated Study
Requests

May 5, 2008.
    a. Type of Filing: Notice of Intent to File License Application for
an Original License and Commencing Licensing Proceeding.
    b. Project No.: 12966-001.
    c. Dated Filed: March 3, 2008.
    d. Submitted By: Utah Board of Natural Resources.
    e. Name of Project: Lake Powell Hydroelectric System.
    f. Location: On federal, state, and private lands in Kane,
Washington and Iron counties, Utah; and in Coconino and Mohave
counties, Arizona.
    g. Filed Pursuant to: 18 CFR Part 5 of the Commission's
Regulations.
    h. Applicant Contact: Eric Millis, P.E., Utah Division of Water
Resources, 1594 W. North Temple, P.O. Box 14620, Salt Lake City, UT
84118-6201,<PHONE_NUMBER>.
    i. FERC Contact: Jim Fargo at<PHONE_NUMBER> or e-mail at
<EMAIL_ADDRESS>    j. We are asking federal, state, local, and tribal agencies with
jurisdiction and/or special expertise with respect to environmental
issues to cooperate with us in the preparation of the environmental
document. Agencies who would like to request cooperating status should
follow the instructions for filing comments described in paragraph o
below. Cooperating agencies should note the Commission's policy that
agencies that cooperate in the preparation of the environmental

document cannot also intervene. See, 94 FERC ] 61,076 (2001).
    k. With this notice, we are initiating informal consultation with:
(a) the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service and/or NOAA Fisheries under
section 7 of the Endangered Species Act and the joint agency
regulations thereunder at 50 CFR, Part 402 and (b) the State Historic
Preservation Officer, as required by Section 106, National Historic
Preservation Act, and the implementing regulations of the Advisory
Council on Historic Preservation at 36 CFR 800.2.
    l. With this notice, we are designating the Utah Board of Water
Resources as the Commission's non-federal representative for carrying
out informal consultation, pursuant to Section 7 of the Endangered
Species Act and Section 106 of the National Historic Preservation Act.
    m. Utah Board of Water Resources filed a Pre-Application Document
(PAD; including a proposed process plan and schedule) with the
Commission, pursuant to 18 CFR 5.6 of the Commission's regulations.
    n. A copy of the PAD is available for review at the Commission in
the Public Reference Room or may be viewed on the Commission's Web site
(http://www.ferc.gov), using the ``eLibrary'' link. Enter the docket
number, excluding the last three digits in the docket number field to
access the document. For assistance, contact FERC Online Support at
<EMAIL_ADDRESS>or toll free at 1-866-208-3676, or for TTY,
(202) 502-8659. A copy is also available for inspection and
reproduction at the address in paragraph h.
    Register online at http://ferc.gov/esubscribenow.htm to be notified
via e-mail of new filing and issuances related to this or other pending
projects. For assistance, contact FERC Online Support.
    o. With this notice, we are soliciting comments on the PAD and
Scoping Document 1 (SD1), as well as study requests. All comments on
the PAD and SD1, and study requests should be sent to the address above
in paragraph h. In addition, all comments on the PAD and SD1, study
requests, requests for cooperating agency status, and all
communications to and from Commission staff related to the merits of
the potential application (original and eight copies) must be filed
with the Commission at the following address: Kimberly D. Bose,
Secretary, Federal Energy Regulatory Commission, 888 First Street, NE.,
Washington, DC 20426. All filings with the Commission must include on
the first page, the project name (Lake Powell Hydroelectric System) and
number (P-12966-001), and bear the heading ``Comments on Pre-
Application Document,'' ``Study Requests,'' ``Comments on Scoping
Document 1,'' ``Request for Cooperating Agency Status,'' or
``Communications to and from Commission Staff.'' Any individual or
entity interested in submitting study requests, commenting on the PAD
or SD1, and any agency requesting cooperating status must do so by July
3, 2008.
    Comments on the PAD and SD1, study requests, requests for
cooperating agency status, and other permissible forms of
communications with the Commission may be filed electronically via the
Internet in lieu of paper. The Commission strongly encourages
electronic filings. See 18 CFR 385.2001(a)(1)(iii) and the instructions
on the Commission's Web site (http://www.ferc.gov) under the ``e-
filing'' link.
    p. Our intent is to prepare an Environmental Impact Statement (EIS)
for which the planned meetings will satisfy the NEPA scoping
requirements.

Scoping Meetings

    Commission staff will hold three scoping meetings in the vicinity
of the project at the time and place noted below. We invite all
interested individuals, organizations, and agencies to attend one or
both of the meetings, and to assist staff in identifying particular
study needs, as well as the scope of environmental issues to be
addressed in the environmental document. The times and locations of
these meetings are as follows:
    Tuesday, June 10, 2008--5 p.m. to 9 p.m.--Kanab Middle School, 690
Cowboy Way, Kanab, Utah.
    Wednesday, June 11, 2008--5 p.m. to 9 p.m.--Dixie Center, 1835
Convention Center Drive, St. George, Utah.
    Thursday, June 12, 2008--5 p.m. to 9 p.m.--Festival Hall Conference
Center, 105 North 100 East, Cedar City, Utah.
    Scoping Document 1 (SD1), which outlines the subject areas to be
addressed in the environmental document, was mailed to the individuals
and entities on the Commission's mailing list. Copies of SD1 will be
available at the scoping meetings, or may be viewed on the Web at
http://www.ferc.gov, using the ``eLibrary'' link. Follow the directions
for accessing information in paragraph n. Based on all oral and written
comments, a Scoping Document 2 (SD2) will be issued. SD2 will include a
revised process plan and schedule, as well as a list of issues,
identified through the scoping process.

Site Visit

    On June 9 and 10, 2008, Commission staff will visit the site of the
proposed Lake Powell Pipeline. We will view the proposed pipeline route
and possibly alternative routes that have been considered for the
project. Staff will tour these proposed project areas by automobile and
on foot. Representatives of the Utah Board of Natural Resources will
accompany the Commission staff.
    Interested parties may attend the site visit. Those planning to
attend must provide their own transportation. If you are interested in
attending the site visit, or would like more information about the
visit, please contact Harold Sersland at<PHONE_NUMBER>. Those
attending the site visit on Monday, June 9, should meet at 8 a.m. at
the Sand Hollow Reservoir State Park entrance pay station (please bring
your own food and water for the day). The plan on Monday is tour Sand
Hollow Hydro Site 7 and Hurricane Cliffs Hydro Sites 5 and 6, and then
follow the proposed pipeline route until south of the Kaibab Indian
Reservation, ending at about 5 p.m.
    Those taking the site visit on Tuesday, June 10, should meet at 8
a.m. at the BLM Interpretive Center in east Kanab on U.S. 89, (again
please bring own food and water for the day). The trip will start near
the proposed Hydro Site 2 and end at Glen Canyon National Recreation
Area at Lake Powell around 2 p.m.

Meeting Objectives

    At the scoping meetings, staff will: (1) Initiate scoping of the
issues; (2) review and discuss existing conditions and resource
management objectives; (3) review and discuss existing information and
identify preliminary information and study needs; (4) review and
discuss the process plan and schedule for pre-filing activity that
incorporates the time frames provided for in Part 5 of the Commission's
regulations and, to the extent possible, maximizes coordination of
federal, state, and tribal permitting and certification processes; and
(5) discuss the appropriateness of any federal or state agency or
Indian tribe acting as a cooperating agency for development of an
environmental document.
    Meeting participants should come prepared to discuss their issues
and/or concerns. Please review the PAD in preparation for the scoping
meetings. Directions on how to obtain a copy of the PAD and SD1 are
included in item n. of this document.

Meeting Procedures

    The meetings will have a stenographer available to record

participants' issues, which will become part of the formal record of
the Commission proceeding on the project.

Kimberly D. Bose,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. E8-10456 Filed 5-9-08; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 6717-01-P


[Federal Register Volume 76, Number 6 (Monday, January 10, 2011)]
[Notices]
[Pages 1488-1489]
[FR Doc No: 2011-163]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

[Release No. 34-63639; File No. SR-ISE-2010-121]

Self-Regulatory Organizations; International Securities Exchange,
LLC; Notice of Filing and Immediate Effectiveness of Proposed Rule
Change Relating to a Market Maker Incentive Plan for Foreign Currency
Options

January 4, 2011.
    Pursuant to Section 19(b)(1) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934
(the ``Act''),\1\ and Rule 19b-4 thereunder,\2\ notice is hereby given
that on December 28, 2010, the International Securities Exchange, LLC
(the ``Exchange'' or the ``ISE'') filed with the Securities and
Exchange Commission the proposed rule change, as described in Items I
and II below, which items have been prepared by the self-regulatory
organization. The Commission is publishing this notice to solicit
comments on the proposed rule change from interested persons.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \1\ 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(1).
    \2\ 17 CFR 240.19b-4.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

I. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement of the Terms of Substance
of the Proposed Rule Change

    The ISE is proposing to extend an incentive plan for market makers
in four foreign currency options (``FX Options''). The text of the
proposed rule change is available on the Exchange's Web site (http://www.ise.com), at the principal office of the Exchange, and at the
Commission's Public Reference Room.

II. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement of the Purpose of, and
Statutory Basis for, the Proposed Rule Change

    In its filing with the Commission, the self-regulatory organization
included statements concerning the purpose of, and basis for, the
proposed rule change and discussed any comments it received on the
proposed rule change. The text of these
    statements may be examined at the places specified in Item IV
below. The self-regulatory organization has prepared summaries, set
forth in sections A, B and C below, of the most significant aspects of
such statements.

A. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement of the Purpose of, and
Statutory Basis for, the Proposed Rule Change

1. Purpose
    The purpose of this proposed rule change is to extend an incentive
plan for market makers in options on the New Zealand dollar (``NZD''),
the Mexican peso (``PZO''), the Swedish krona (``SKA'') and the
Brazilian real (``BRB'').\3\ On August 3, 2009, the Exchange adopted an
incentive plan applicable to market makers in NZD, PZO and SKA,\4\ and
on January 19, 2010, added BRB to the incentive plan.\5\ The Exchange
has since extended the date by which market makers may join the
incentive plan \6\ and now proposes to do so again.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \3\ The Commission previously approved the trading of options on
NZD, PZO, SKA and BRB. See Exchange Act Release No. 34-55575 (April
3, 2007), 72 FR 17963 (April 10, 2007) (SR-ISE-2006-59).
    \4\ See Exchange Act Release No. 34-60536 (August 19, 2009), 74
FR 43204 (August 26, 2009) (SR-ISE-2009-59).
    \5\ See Exchange Act Release No. 34-61459 (February 1, 2010), 75
FR 6248 (February 8, 2010) (SR-ISE-2010-07).
    \6\ See Exchange Act Release Nos. 34-60810 (October 9, 2009), 74
FR 53527 (October 19, 2009) (SR-ISE-2009-80), 34-61334 (January 12,
2010), 75 FR 2913 (January 19, 2010) (SR-ISE-2009-115), 61851 (April
6, 2010), 75 FR 18565 (April 12, 2010) (SR-ISE-2010-27), 34-62503
(July 15, 2010), 75 FR 42812 (July 22, 2010) (SR-ISE-2010-71) and
34-36045 (October 5, 2010), 75 FR 62900 (October 13, 2010) (SR-ISE-
2010-100).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    In order to promote trading in these FX Options, the Exchange has
an incentive plan pursuant to which the Exchange waives the transaction
fees for the Early Adopter \7\ FXPMM \8\ and all Early Adopter FXCMMs
\9\ that make a market in NZD, PZO SKA and BRB for as long as the
incentive plan is in effect. Further, pursuant to a revenue sharing
agreement entered into between an Early Adopter Market Maker and ISE,
the Exchange pays the Early Adopter FXPMM forty percent (40%) of the
transaction fees collected on any customer trade in NZD, PZO SKA and
BRB and pays up to ten (10) Early Adopter FXCMMs that participate in
the incentive plan twenty percent (20%) of the transaction fees
collected for trades between a customer and that FXCMM. Market makers
that do not participate in the incentive plan are charged regular
transaction fees for trades in these products. In order to participate
in the incentive plan, market makers are currently required to enter
into the incentive plan no later than December 31, 2010. The Exchange
now proposes to extend the date by which market makers may enter into
the incentive plan to March 31, 2011.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \7\ Participants in the incentive plan are known on the
Exchange's Schedule of Fees as Early Adopter Market Makers.
    \8\ A FXPMM is a primary market maker selected by the Exchange
that trades and quotes in FX Options only. See ISE Rule 2213.
    \9\ A FXCMM is a competitive market maker selected by the
Exchange that trades and quotes in FX Options only. See ISE Rule
2213.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

 2. Basis
    The Exchange believes that the proposed rule change is consistent
with the objectives of Section 6 of the Act,\10\ in general, and
furthers the objectives of Section 6(b)(4),\11\ in particular, in that
it is designed to provide for the equitable allocation of reasonable
dues, fees and other charges among its members and other persons using
its facilities. The Exchange believes the proposed rule change will
permit additional market makers to join the incentive plan which in
turn will generate additional order flow to the Exchange by creating
incentives to trade these FX Options as well as defray operational
costs for Early Adopter Market Makers.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \10\ 15 U.S.C. 78f(b).
    \11\ 15 U.S.C. 78f(b)(4).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

B. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement on Burden on Competition

    The proposed rule change does not impose any burden on competition
that is not necessary or appropriate in furtherance of the purposes of
the Act.

C. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement on Comments on the Proposed
Rule Change Received From Members, Participants or Others

    The Exchange has not solicited, and does not intend to solicit,
comments on this proposed rule change. The Exchange has not received
any unsolicited written comments from members or other interested
parties.

III. Date of Effectiveness of the Proposed Rule Change and Timing for
Commission Action

    The foregoing rule change has become effective pursuant to Section
19(b)(3)(A)(ii) of the Act.\12\ At any time within 60 days of the
filing of such proposed rule change, the Commission summarily may
temporarily suspend such rule change if it appears to the Commission
that such action is necessary or appropriate in the public interest,
for the protection of investors, or otherwise in furtherance of the
purposes of the Act. If the Commission takes such action, the
Commission shall institute proceedings to determine whether the
proposed rule should be approved or disapproved.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \12\ 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(3)(A)(ii).

---------------------------------------------------------------------------

IV. Solicitation of Comments

    Interested persons are invited to submit written data, views, and
arguments concerning the foregoing, including whether the proposed rule
change is consistent with the Act. Comments may be submitted by any of
the following methods:

Electronic Comments

     Use the Commission's Internet comment form http://www.sec.gov/rules/sro.shtml); or
     Send an E-mail to<EMAIL_ADDRESS>Please include
File No. SR-ISE-2010-121 on the subject line.

Paper Comments

     Send paper comments in triplicate to Elizabeth M. Murphy,
Secretary, Securities and Exchange Commission, 100 F Street, NE.,
Washington, DC 20549-1090.

All submissions should refer to File Number SR-ISE-2010-121. This file
number should be included on the subject line if e-mail is used. To
help the Commission process and review your comments more efficiently,
please use only one method. The Commission will post all comments on
the Commission's Internet Web site (http://www.sec.gov/rules/sro.shtml). Copies of the submission, all subsequent amendments, all
written statements with respect to the proposed rule change that are
filed with the Commission, and all written communications relating to
the proposed rule change between the Commission and any person, other
than those that may be withheld from the public in accordance with the
provisions of 5 U.S.C. 552, will be available for Web site viewing and
printing in the Commission's Public Reference Room, 100 F Street, NE.,
Washington, DC 20549 on official business days between the hours of 10
a.m. and 3 p.m. Copies of such filing also will be available for
inspection and copying at the principal office of the ISE. All comments
received will be posted without change; the Commission does not edit
personal identifying information from submissions. You should submit
only information that you wish to make available publicly. All
submissions should refer to File Number SR-ISE-2010-121 and should be
submitted by January 31, 2011.

    For the Commission, by the Division of Trading and Markets,
pursuant to delegated authority.\13\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \13\ 17 CFR 200.30-3(a)(12).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

Elizabeth M. Murphy,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2011-163 Filed 1-7-11; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 8011-01-P