[Federal Register: August 23, 2010 (Volume 75, Number 162)]
[Notices]
[Page 51833-51834]
[DOCID:fr23au10-94]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY

Federal Emergency Management Agency

[Internal Agency Docket No. FEMA-1887-DR; Docket ID FEMA-2010-0002]

South Dakota; Amendment No. 1 to Notice of a Major Disaster
Declaration

AGENCY: Federal Emergency Management Agency, DHS.

ACTION: Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: This notice amends the notice of a major disaster declaration
for the State of South Dakota (FEMA-1887-DR), dated March 10, 2010, and
related determinations.

DATES: Effective Date: August 13, 2010.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Peggy Miller, Recovery Directorate,
Federal Emergency Management

Agency, 500 C Street, SW., Washington, DC 20472,<PHONE_NUMBER>.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The Federal Emergency Management Agency
(FEMA) hereby gives notice that pursuant to the authority vested in the
Administrator, under Executive Order 12148, as amended, Michael L.
Parker, of FEMA is appointed to act as the Federal Coordinating Officer
for this disaster.
    This action terminates the appointment of Nancy M. Casper as
Federal Coordinating Officer for this disaster.

The following Catalog of Federal Domestic Assistance Numbers (CFDA)
are to be used for reporting and drawing funds: 97.030, Community
Disaster Loans; 97.031, Cora Brown Fund; 97.032, Crisis Counseling;
97.033, Disaster Legal Services; 97.034, Disaster Unemployment
Assistance (DUA); 97.046, Fire Management Assistance Grant; 97.048,
Disaster Housing Assistance to Individuals and Households in
Presidentially Declared Disaster Areas; 97.049, Presidentially
Declared Disaster Assistance--Disaster Housing Operations for
Individuals and Households; 97.050, Presidentially Declared Disaster
Assistance to Individuals and Households--Other Needs; 97.036,
Disaster Grants--Public Assistance (Presidentially Declared
Disasters); 97.039, Hazard Mitigation Grant.

W. Craig Fugate,
Administrator, Federal Emergency Management Agency.
[FR Doc. 2010-20764 Filed 8-20-10; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 9111-23-P


[Federal Register Volume 82, Number 64 (Wednesday, April 5, 2017)]
[Notices]
[Pages 16658-16659]
[FR Doc No: 2017-06745]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION

Federal Aviation Administration

Agency Information Collection Activities: Requests for Comments;
Clearance of Renewed Approval of Information Collection: National
Flight Data Center Web Portal

AGENCY: Federal Aviation Administration (FAA), DOT.

ACTION: Notice and request for comments.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: In accordance with the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995, FAA
invites public comments about our intention to request the Office of
Management and Budget (OMB) approval to renew a previously approved
information collection. National Flight Data Center (NFDC) Web Portal
forms are used to collect aeronautical information, detailing the
physical description and operational status of all components of the
National Airspace System (NAS).

DATES: Written comments should be submitted by June 5, 2017.

ADDRESSES: Send comments to the FAA at the following address: Ronda
Thompson, Room 441, Federal Aviation Administration, ASP-110, 950
L'Enfant Plaza SW., Washington, DC 20024.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Ronda Thompson by email at:
<EMAIL_ADDRESS>
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: You are asked to comment on any aspect of
this information collection, including (a) Whether the proposed
collection of information is necessary for FAA's performance; (b) the
accuracy of the estimated burden; (c) ways for FAA to enhance the
quality, utility and clarity of the information collection; and (d)
ways that the burden could be minimized without reducing the quality of
the collected information. The agency will summarize and/or include
your comments in the request for OMB's clearance of this information
collection.
    OMB Control Number: 2120-0754.
    Title: National Flight Data Center Web Portal.
    Form Numbers: FAA Form 7900-1, 7900-2, 7900-3, 7900-4, 7900-5,
7900-6, 7900-7.
    Type of Review: Renewal of an information collection.
    Background: The National Flight Data Center (NFDC) is the
authoritative government source for collecting, validating, storing,
maintaining, and disseminating aeronautical data concerning the United
States and its territories to support real-time aviation activities.
The information collected

ensures the safe and efficient navigation of the national airspace. The
information collected is maintained in the National Airspace System
Resources (NASR) database which serves as the official repository for
NAS data and is provided to government, military, and private producers
of aeronautical charts, publications, and flight management systems.
    Respondents: Approximately 7,318 representatives of U.S. public
airports, U.S. privately-owned instrument landing systems, and non-
Federal weather systems.
    Frequency: Information is collected on occasion.
    Estimated Average Burden per Response: 25 minutes.
    Estimated Total Annual Burden: 1,296 hours.

    Issued in Washington, DC, on March 29, 2017.
Ronda L. Thompson,
FAA Information Collection Clearance Officer, Performance, Policy &
Records Management Branch, ASP-110.
[FR Doc. 2017-06745 Filed 4-4-17; 8:45 am]
 BILLING CODE 4910-13-P


[Federal Register Volume 77, Number 11 (Wednesday, January 18, 2012)]
[Notices]
[Pages 2603-2605]
[FR Doc No: 2012-796]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION

Federal Aviation Administration

Public Notice for Waiver of Aeronautical Land-Use Assurance;
Willow Run Airport; Detroit, MI

AGENCY: Federal Aviation Administration, DOT.

ACTION: Notice of intent of waiver with respect to land.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) is considering a
proposal to authorize the release of approximately 29.5 acres of
airport property for sale. The land consists of portions of the
original airport parcels. These parcels were acquired by the Wayne
County Road Commissioners of Wayne County, Michigan, its successors and
assigns (Wayne County Airport Authority) from the U.S. Government,
General Services Administration without federal participation. This
property was previously released for non-aeronautical use. There are no
requirements to retain the land for airport use. There are no impacts
to the airport by allowing the Wayne County Airport Authority to sell
the property. The land is not needed for aeronautical use. Approval
does not constitute a commitment by the FAA to financially assist in
the sale of the subject airport property nor a determination of
eligibility for grant-in-aid funding from the FAA. The disposition of
proceeds from the sale of the airport property will be in accordance
with FAA's Policy and Procedures Concerning the Use of Airport Revenue,
published in the Federal Register on February 16, 1999.
    In accordance with section 47107(h) of title 49, United States
Code, this notice is required to be published in the Federal Register
30 days before modifying the land-use assurance that requires the
property to be used for an aeronautical purpose.

DATES: Comments must be received on or before February 17, 2012.

ADDRESSES: Written comments on the Sponsor's request must be delivered
or mailed to: Irene R. Porter, Program Manager, Detroit Airports
District Office, 11677 South Wayne Road Suite 107, Romulus, MI 48174.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Irene R. Porter, Program Manager,
Federal Aviation Administration, Great Lakes Region, Detroit Airports
District Office, DET ADO-607, 11677 South Wayne Road Suite 107,
Romulus, Michigan 48174. Telephone Number<PHONE_NUMBER>)/Fax Number
(734) 229-2950). Documents reflecting this FAA action may be reviewed
at this same location or at Willow Run Airport, Detroit, Michigan.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

Exhibit ``A''

    Part of Section 12, Town 3 South, Range 7 East, Ypsilanti Township,
Washtenaw County, Michigan and being more particularly described as
follows: Commencing at the Northeast corner of Section 12, Town 3
South, Range 7 East, Ypsilanti Township, Washtenaw County, Michigan;
Running thence the following courses and distances along the Easterly
and Southerly line of the General Motors Corporation, Hydra-Matic
Division, Willow Run Plant Property, South 01 degree 27 minutes 26
seconds West along the East line of said Section 12, a distance of
33.00 feet to the Northwest corner of Section 7, Town 3 South, Range 8
East, Van Buren Township, Wayne County, Michigan; thence North 87
degrees 37 minutes 30 seconds East along the North line of said Section
7, a distance of 33.07 feet to a point; thence South 01 degree 27
minutes 26 seconds West, 525.40 feet to a point; thence North 89
degrees 59 minutes 56 seconds East, 153.16 feet to a point; thence
South 00 degrees 00 minutes 04 seconds West, 275.00 feet to a point;
thence South 89 degrees 59 minutes 56 seconds West across the line
common to said Sections 7 and 12 and into said Section 12, a distance
of 425.10 feet to a point; thence South 00 degrees 00 minutes 35
seconds West, 534.67 feet to a point; thence South 24 degrees 17
minutes 05 seconds East across the line common to said Sections 12 and
7 and into said Section 7, a distance of 741.25 feet to a point; thence
South, 768.31 feet to a point; thence South 41 degrees 23 minutes 40
seconds West across the line common to said Sections 7 and 12 and into
said Section 12, a distance of 225.25 feet to a point; thence South 64
degrees 28 minutes 25 seconds West, 125.00 feet to a point; thence
North, 40.00 feet to a point; thence North 75 degrees 54 minutes 30
seconds West, 404.79 feet to a point; thence West, 473.73 feet to a
point; thence South 00 degrees 08 minutes 45 seconds West a measured
distance of 241.25 feet (described 243.27 feet) to a point; thence
South 77 degrees 57 minutes 35 seconds West a distance of 4.93 feet to
the point of beginning of the parcel of land herein being described;
Proceeding thence from said point of beginning South 00 degrees 03
minutes 01 second West along the Easterly edge of an existing concrete
roadway, a distance of 1102.78 feet to a point of curve in said
roadway; thence continuing along the Easterly edge of said roadway,
along the arc of a curve, concave to the Northeast, having a radius
334.72 feet, a central angle of 50 degrees 31 minutes 07 seconds, an
arc distance of 295.13 feet (chord bears South 25 degrees 12 minutes 33
seconds East 285.66 feet) to a point; thence North 64 degrees 36
minutes 55 seconds West, along a line not tangent to the foregoing
curve, a distance of 204.04 feet to a point of curve; thence along the
arc of a curve concave to the Northeast, having a radius of 3233.20
feet, a central angle of 08 degrees 03 minutes 00 seconds, an arc
distance of 454.26 (chord bears North 60 degrees 35 minutes 25 seconds
West 453.89 feet) to a point of tangent; thence North 56 degrees 33
minutes 55 seconds West, a distance of 1484.43 feet to a point of
curve; thence along the arc of a curve, concave to the Northeast,
having a radius of 3739.90 feet, a central angle of 01 degrees 59
minutes 46 seconds, an arc distance of 130.30 feet (chord North 55
degrees 34 minutes 02 seconds West 103.29 feet) to a point of tangent;
thence North 54 degrees 34 minutes 09 seconds West, a distance of
359.56 feet to a point on the Southerly line of said General Motors
Corporation, Hydra-Matic Division, Willow Run Plant Property; thence
the following courses and distance along the Southerly line of said
Hydra-Matic Division, Willow Run Plant Property, South 89 degrees 55
minutes 54 seconds East, 61.04 feet to a point; thence South 56 degrees
33 minutes 55 seconds East, 215.23 feet to a point; thence South 75
degrees 32 minutes 00 seconds East 172.85 feet to a point; thence South
80 degrees 44 minutes 00 seconds East 75.00 feet to a point; thence
South 87 degrees 23 minutes 00 seconds East 70.12 feet to a point;
thence East 1059.88 feet to a point; thence North 24.27 feet to a
point; thence North 77 degrees 57 minutes 35 seconds East a distance of
497.22 feet to the point of beginning.

Exhibit ``B''

    Part of Section 12, Town 3 South, Range 7 East, Ypsilanti Township,
Washtenaw County, and part of Section 7, Town 3 South, Range 8 East,
Van Buren Township, Wayne County, Michigan and being more particularly
described as follows: Commencing at the Northeast corner of Section 12,
Town 3 South, Range 7 East, Ypsilanti Township, Washtenaw County,
Michigan; Running thence the following courses and distances along the
Easterly line of the General Motors Corporation, Hydra-Matic Division,
Willow Run Plant Property, South 01 degree 27 minutes 26 seconds West
along the East line of said Section 12, a distance of 33.00 feet to the
Northwest corner of Section 7, Town 3 South, Range 8 East, Van Buren
Township, Wayne County, Michigan; thence North 87 degrees 37 minutes 30
seconds East along the North line of said Section 7, a distance of
33.07 feet to a point; thence South 01 degree 27 minutes 26 seconds
West, 525.40 feet to a point; thence North 89 degrees 59 minutes 56
seconds East, 153.16 feet to a point; thence South 00 degrees 00
minutes 04 seconds West, 275.00 feet to a point; thence South 89
degrees 59 minutes 56 seconds West across the line common to said
Sections 7 and 12 and into said Section 12, a distance of 425.10 feet
to a point; thence South 00 degrees 00 minutes 35 seconds West, 534.67
feet to a point; thence South 24 degrees 17 minutes 05 seconds East, a
distance of 102.37 feet to the point of beginning of the parcel of land
herein being described; Proceeding thence from said point of beginning
South 74 degrees 42 minutes 16 seconds East along the line of a six
foot chain link fence, a distance of 32.84 feet to an angle point in
said fence line; thence continuing along said fence line, South 89
degrees 58 minutes 36 seconds East across the line common to said
Sections 12 and 7 and into said Section 7, a distance of 231.08 feet to
a point; thence South, along the Northerly extension of a portion of
the Easterly line of said General Motors Corporation, Hydra-Matic
Division, Willow Run Plant Property, a distance of 573.60 feet to a
point on the Easterly line of said Hydra-Matic Division Property;
thence North 24 degrees 17 minutes 05 seconds West along said property
line, a distance of 638.88 feet to the point of beginning.

Exhibit ``C''

    Part of Section 12, Town 3 South, Range 7 East, Ypsilanti Township,
Washtenaw County, and part of Section 7, Town 3 South, Range 8 East,
Van Buren Township, Wayne County, Michigan and being more particularly
described as follows: Commencing at the Northeast corner of Section 12,
Town 3 South, Range 7 East, Ypsilanti Township, Washtenaw County,
Michigan; Running thence the following courses and distances along the
Easterly line of the General Motors Corporation, Hydra-Matic Division,
Willow Run

Plant Property, South 01 degree 27 minutes 26 seconds West along the
East line of said Section 12, a distance of 33.00 feet to the Northwest
corner of Section 7, Town 3 South, Range 8 East, Van Buren Township,
Wayne County, Michigan; thence North 87 degrees 37 minutes 30 seconds
East along the North line of said Section 7, a distance of 33.07 feet
to a point; thence South 01 degree 27 minutes 26 seconds West, 525.40
feet to a point; thence North 89 degrees 59 minutes 56 seconds East,
153.16 feet to a point; thence South 00 degrees 00 minutes 04 seconds
West, 275.00 feet to a point; thence South 89 degrees 59 minutes 56
seconds West across the line common to said Sections 7 and 12 and into
said Section 12, a distance of 425.10 feet to a point; thence South 00
degrees 00 minutes 35 seconds West, 534.67 feet to a point; thence
South 24 degrees 17 minutes 05 seconds East across the line common to
said Sections 12 and 7 and into said Section 7, a distance of 741.25
feet to a point; thence South, a distance of 768.31 feet to the point
of beginning of the parcel of land herein described; Proceeding thence
from said point of beginning South, along the Southerly extension of a
portion of the Easterly line of said General Motors Corporation, Hydra-
Matic Division, Willow Run Plant Property, a distance of 221.53 feet to
a point; thence South 89 degrees 42 minutes 46 seconds West along the
line of a six foot chain link fence, a distance of 261.75 feet to a
point on the Southerly line of said General Motors Corporation, Hydra-
Matic Division, Willow Run Plant Property; thence North 64 degrees 28
minutes 25 seconds East along said property line, a distance of 125.00
feet to an angle point in said property line; thence continuing along
said property line North 41 degrees 23 minutes 40 seconds East a
distance of 225.25 feet to the point of beginning.

    Issued in Romulus, Michigan, on December 21, 2011.
John L. Mayfield, Jr.,
Manager, Detroit Airports District Office, FAA, Great Lakes Region.
[FR Doc. 2012-796 Filed 1-17-12; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910-13-P


[Federal Register Volume 80, Number 89 (Friday, May 8, 2015)]
[Proposed Rules]
[Pages 26484-26487]
[FR Doc No: 2015-11023]

=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION

Federal Aviation Administration

14 CFR Part 39

[Docket No. FAA-2015-1279; Directorate Identifier 2014-NM-049-AD]
RIN 2120-AA64

Airworthiness Directives; BAE SYSTEMS (Operations) Limited
Airplanes

AGENCY: Federal Aviation Administration (FAA), DOT.

ACTION: Notice of proposed rulemaking (NPRM).

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: We propose to supersede Airworthiness Directive (AD) 2011-21-
06 for all BAE SYSTEMS (Operations) Limited Model 4101 airplanes. AD
2011-21-06 currently requires revising the maintenance program. Since
we issued AD 2011-21-06, we have determined that the life limit of
certain main landing gear components must be reduced, and certain post-
repair inspections of critical structure are necessary. This proposed
AD would require a new revision of the maintenance/inspection program.
We are proposing this AD to prevent failure of certain structurally
significant items,

including the main landing gear and nose landing gear, which could
result in reduced structural integrity of the airplane; and to prevent
fuel vapor ignition sources, which could result in a fuel tank
explosion and consequent loss of the airplane.

DATES: We must receive comments on this proposed AD by June 22, 2015.

ADDRESSES: You may send comments by any of the following methods:
     Federal eRulemaking Portal: Go to http://www.regulations.gov. Follow the instructions for submitting comments.
     Fax:<PHONE_NUMBER>.
     Mail: U.S. Department of Transportation, Docket
Operations, M-30, West Building Ground Floor, Room W12-140, 1200 New
Jersey Avenue SE., Washington, DC 20590.
     Hand Delivery: U.S. Department of Transportation, Docket
Operations, M-30, West Building Ground Floor, Room W12-140, 1200 New
Jersey Avenue SE., Washington, DC, between 9 a.m. and 5 p.m., Monday
through Friday, except Federal holidays.
    For service information identified in this proposed AD, contact BAE
SYSTEMS (Operations) Limited, Customer Information Department,
Prestwick International Airport, Ayrshire, KA9 2RW, Scotland, United
Kingdom; telephone +44 1292 675207; fax +44 1292 675704; email
<EMAIL_ADDRESS>Internet http://www.baesystems.com/Businesses/RegionalAircraft/index.htm. You may view this referenced
service information at the FAA, Transport Airplane Directorate, 1601
Lind Avenue SW., Renton, WA. For information on the availability of
this material at the FAA, call<PHONE_NUMBER>.

Examining the AD Docket

    You may examine the AD docket on the Internet at http://www.regulations.gov by searching for and locating Docket No. FAA-2015-
1279; or in person at the Docket Management Facility between 9 a.m. and
5 p.m., Monday through Friday, except Federal holidays. The AD docket
contains this proposed AD, the regulatory evaluation, any comments
received, and other information. The street address for the Docket
Operations office (telephone<PHONE_NUMBER>) is in the ADDRESSES section.
Comments will be available in the AD docket shortly after receipt.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Todd Thompson, Aerospace Engineer,
International Branch, ANM-116, Transport Airplane Directorate, FAA,
1601 Lind Avenue SW., Renton, WA 98057-3356; telephone:<PHONE_NUMBER>;
fax<PHONE_NUMBER>.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

Comments Invited

    We invite you to send any written relevant data, views, or
arguments about this proposed AD. Send your comments to an address
listed under the ADDRESSES section. Include ``Docket No. FAA-2015-1279;
Directorate Identifier 2014-NM-049-AD'' at the beginning of your
comments. We specifically invite comments on the overall regulatory,
economic, environmental, and energy aspects of this proposed AD. We
will consider all comments received by the closing date and may amend
this proposed AD based on those comments.
    We will post all comments we receive, without change, to http://www.regulations.gov, including any personal information you provide. We
will also post a report summarizing each substantive verbal contact we
receive about this proposed AD.

Discussion

    On September 23, 2011, we issued AD 2011-21-06, Amendment 39-16829
(76 FR 64788, October 19, 2011). AD 2011-21-06 requires actions
intended to address an unsafe condition on BAE SYSTEMS (Operations)
Limited Model 4101 airplanes.
    Since we issued AD 2011-21-06, Amendment 39-16829 (76 FR 64788,
October 19, 2011), we have determined that the life limit of certain
main landing gear components must be reduced, and new inspections of
certain repairs that affect fatigue strength of critical structure must
be added to the maintenance/inspection program.
    The European Aviation Safety Agency (EASA), which is the Technical
Agent for the Member States of the European Union, has issued EASA
Airworthiness Directive 2014-0043, dated February 21, 2014 (referred to
after this as the Mandatory Continuing Airworthiness Information, or
``the MCAI''), to correct an unsafe condition for the specified
products. The MCAI states:

    The Jetstream J41 Aircraft Maintenance Manual (AMM), includes
the following chapters:
    05-10-10 ``Airworthiness Limitations'',
    05-10-20 ``Certification Maintenance Requirements'', and,
    05-10-30 ``Critical Design Configuration Control Limitations
(CDCCL)--Fuel System''.
    The maintenance tasks and limitations contained in these
chapters have been identified as mandatory actions for continued
airworthiness and EASA issued AD 2010-0098 [dated May 27, 2010
(http://ad.easa.europa.eu/ad/2010-0098) which corresponds to FAA AD
2011-21-06, Amendment 39-16829 (79 FR 64788, October 19, 2011)] to
require operators to comply with those instructions.
    Since that [EASA] AD was issued, BAE Systems (Operations) Ltd
issued Revision 37 of the AMM amending Chapter 05-10-10 to revise
and reduce the life limit of certain main landing gear components.
In addition, Revision 38 of the AMM was issued to amend Chapters 05-
10-00 and 05-10-10 introducing inspections to be accomplished after
implementation of some repairs affecting fatigue strength of
critical structure. Failure to comply with the new and more
restrictive actions could result in an unsafe condition.
    For the reasons described above, this [EASA] AD, which
supersedes EASA AD 2010-0098, requires implementation of the
maintenance requirements and/or airworthiness limitations as
specified in the defined parts of Chapter 05 of the AMM at Revision
38.

    The unsafe condition is the failure of certain structurally
significant items, including the main landing gear and nose landing
gear, which could result in reduced structural integrity of the
airplane; and fuel vapor ignition sources, which could result in a fuel
tank explosion and consequent loss of the airplane. You may examine the
MCAI in the AD docket on the Internet at http://www.regulations.gov by
searching for and locating Docket No. FAA-2015-1279.

Related Service Information Under 1 CFR Part 51

    BAE SYSTEMS (Operations) Limited has issued Subjects 05-10-10,
``Airworthiness Limitations''; 05-10-20, ``Certification Maintenance
Requirements''; and 05-10-30, ``Critical Design Configuration Control
Limitations (CDCCL)--Fuel System''; of Chapter 05, ``Airworthiness
Limitations,'' of the BAE Systems (Operations) Limited J41 AMM,
Revision 38, dated September 15, 2013, which describe procedures for
inspections of structurally significant items and the fuel system. The
actions described in this service information are intended to correct
the unsafe condition identified in the MCAI. This service information
is reasonably available because the interested parties have access to
it through their normal course of business or by the means identified
in the ADDRESSES section of this NPRM.

FAA's Determination and Requirements of This Proposed AD

    This product has been approved by the aviation authority of another
country, and is approved for operation in the United States. Pursuant
to our bilateral agreement with the State of Design Authority, we have
been notified of the unsafe condition described in the MCAI and service
information referenced above. We are proposing this AD because we
evaluated all pertinent

information and determined an unsafe condition exists and is likely to
exist or develop on other products of the same type design.

Costs of Compliance

    We estimate that this proposed AD affects 4 airplanes of U.S.
registry.
    The actions required by AD 2011-21-06, Amendment 39-16829 (76 FR
64788, October 19, 2011), and retained in this proposed AD take about 1
work-hour per product, at an average labor rate of $85 per work-hour.
Based on these figures, the estimated cost of the actions that are
required by AD 2011-21-06 is $85 per product.
    We also estimate that it would take about 1 work-hour per product
to comply with the basic requirements of this proposed AD. The average
labor rate is $85 per work-hour. Based on these figures, we estimate
the cost of this proposed AD on U.S. operators to be $340, or $85 per
product.

Authority for This Rulemaking

    Title 49 of the United States Code specifies the FAA's authority to
issue rules on aviation safety. Subtitle I, section 106, describes the
authority of the FAA Administrator. ``Subtitle VII: Aviation
Programs,'' describes in more detail the scope of the Agency's
authority.
    We are issuing this rulemaking under the authority described in
``Subtitle VII, Part A, Subpart III, Section 44701: General
requirements.'' Under that section, Congress charges the FAA with
promoting safe flight of civil aircraft in air commerce by prescribing
regulations for practices, methods, and procedures the Administrator
finds necessary for safety in air commerce. This regulation is within
the scope of that authority because it addresses an unsafe condition
that is likely to exist or develop on products identified in this
rulemaking action.

Regulatory Findings

    We determined that this proposed AD would not have federalism
implications under Executive Order 13132. This proposed AD would not
have a substantial direct effect on the States, on the relationship
between the national Government and the States, or on the distribution
of power and responsibilities among the various levels of government.
    For the reasons discussed above, I certify this proposed
regulation:
    1. Is not a ``significant regulatory action'' under Executive Order
12866;
    2. Is not a ``significant rule'' under the DOT Regulatory Policies
and Procedures (44 FR 11034, February 26, 1979);
    3. Will not affect intrastate aviation in Alaska; and
    4. Will not have a significant economic impact, positive or
negative, on a substantial number of small entities under the criteria
of the Regulatory Flexibility Act.

List of Subjects in 14 CFR Part 39

    Air transportation, Aircraft, Aviation safety, Incorporation by
reference, Safety.

The Proposed Amendment

    Accordingly, under the authority delegated to me by the
Administrator, the FAA proposes to amend 14 CFR part 39 as follows:

PART 39--AIRWORTHINESS DIRECTIVES

0
1. The authority citation for part 39 continues to read as follows:

    Authority:  49 U.S.C. 106(g), 40113, 44701.

Sec.  39.13  [Amended]

0
2. The FAA amends Sec.  39.13 by removing Airworthiness Directive (AD)
2011-21-06, Amendment 39-16829 (76 FR 64788, October 19, 2011), and
adding the following new AD:

BAE SYSTEMS (Operations) Limited: Docket No. FAA-2015-1279;
Directorate Identifier 2014-NM-049-AD.

(a) Comments Due Date

    We must receive comments by June 22, 2015.

(b) Affected ADs

    This AD replaces AD 2011-21-06, Amendment 39-16829 (76 FR 64788,
October 19, 2011).

(c) Applicability

    This AD applies to all BAE SYSTEMS (Operations) Limited Model
4101 airplanes, certificated in any category.

(d) Subject

    Air Transport Association (ATA) of America Code 05.

(e) Reason

    This AD was prompted by the need to reduce the life limit of
certain main landing gear components, and to add certain post-repair
inspections of critical structure to the maintenance/inspection
program. We are issuing this AD to prevent failure of certain
structurally significant items, including the main landing gear and
nose landing gear, which could result in reduced structural
integrity of the airplane; and to prevent fuel vapor ignition
sources, which could result in a fuel tank explosion and consequent
loss of the airplane.

(f) Compliance

    Comply with this AD within the compliance times specified,
unless already done.

(g) Retained Maintenance Program Revision, With No Changes

    This paragraph restates the requirements of paragraph (i) of AD
2011-21-06, Amendment 39-16829 (76 FR 64788, October 19, 2011), with
no changes. Within 90 days after November 23, 2011 (the effective
date of AD 2011-21-06): Revise the maintenance program by
incorporating Subjects 05-10-10, ``Airworthiness Limitations''; 05-
10-20, ``Certification Maintenance Requirements''; and 05-10-30,
``Critical Design Configuration Control Limitations (CDCCL)--Fuel
System''; of Chapter 05, ``Airworthiness Limitations,'' of the BAE
Systems (Operations) Limited Jetstream Series 4100 Aircraft
Maintenance Manual (AMM), Revision 35, dated February 15, 2011. The
initial compliance times for the tasks are at the applicable times
specified in paragraphs (g)(1), (g)(2), and (g)(3) of this AD. Doing
the actions required by paragraph (i) of this AD terminates the
requirements of this paragraph.
    (1) For replacement tasks of life limited parts specified in
Subject 05-10-10, ``Airworthiness Limitations,'' of Chapter 05,
``Airworthiness Limitations,'' of the BAE Systems (Operations)
Limited Jetstream Series 4100 AMM, Revision 35, dated February 15,
2011: Prior to the applicable flight cycles (landings) or flight
hours (flying hours) on the part specified in the ``Mandatory Life
Limits'' column in Subject 05-10-10, or within 90 days after
November 23, 2011 (the effective date of AD 2011-21-06, Amendment
39-16829 (76 FR 64788, October 19, 2011)), whichever occurs later.
    (2) For structurally significant item tasks specified in Subject
05-10-10, ``Airworthiness Limitations,'' of Chapter 05,
``Airworthiness Limitations,'' of the BAE Systems (Operations)
Limited Jetstream Series 4100 AMM, Revision 35, dated February 15,
2011: Prior to the accumulation of the applicable flight cycles
specified in the ``Initial Inspection'' column in Subject 05-10-10,
or within 90 days after November 23, 2011 (the effective date of AD
2011-21-06, Amendment 39-16829 (76 FR 64788, October 19, 2011)),
whichever occurs later.
    (3) For certification maintenance requirements tasks specified
in Subject 05-10-20, ``Certification Maintenance Requirements,'' of
Chapter 05, ``Airworthiness Limitations,'' of the BAE Systems
(Operations) Limited Jetstream Series 4100 AMM, Revision 35, dated
February 15, 2011: Prior to the accumulation of the applicable
flight hours specified in the ``Time Between Checks'' column in
Subject 05-10-20, or within 90 days after November 23, 2011 (the
effective date of AD 2011-21-06, Amendment 39-16829 (76 FR 64788,
October 19, 2011), whichever occurs later; except for tasks that
specify ``first flight of the day'' in the ``Time Between Checks''
column in Subject 05-10-20, the initial compliance time is the first
flight of the next day after doing the revision required by
paragraph (g) of this AD, or within 90 days after November 23, 2011
(the effective date of AD 2011-21-06), whichever occurs later.

(h) Retained Restrictions on Alternative Actions, Intervals, and/or
CDCCLs, With a New Exception

    This paragraph restates the requirements of paragraph (k) of AD
2011-21-06, Amendment 39-16829 (76 FR 64788, October 19, 2011), with
a new exception. Except as required by paragraph (i) of this AD,
after accomplishing the revision required by paragraph (g) of this
AD, no alternative actions (e.g., inspections), intervals, and/or
CDCCLs may be used unless the actions, intervals, and/or CDCCLs are
approved as an alternative method of compliance (AMOC) in accordance
with the procedures specified in paragraph (l) of this AD.

(i) New Maintenance or Inspection Program Revision

    Within 90 days after the effective date of this AD: Revise the
maintenance or inspection program, as applicable, by incorporating
Subjects 05-10-10, ``Airworthiness Limitations''; 05-10-20,
``Certification Maintenance Requirements''; and 05-10-30, ``Critical
Design Configuration Control Limitations (CDCCL)--Fuel System''; of
Chapter 05, ``Airworthiness Limitations,'' of the BAE Systems
(Operations) Limited J41 AMM, Revision 38, dated September 15, 2013.
The initial compliance times for the tasks are at the applicable
times specified in paragraphs (i)(1), (i)(2), and (i)(3) of this AD.
Doing the actions required by this paragraph terminates the
requirements of paragraph (g) of this AD.
    (1) For replacement tasks of life limited parts specified in
Subject 05-10-10, ``Airworthiness Limitations,'' of Chapter 05,
``Airworthiness Limitations,'' of the BAE Systems (Operations)
Limited J41 AMM, Revision 38, dated September 15, 2013: Prior to the
applicable flight cycles (landings) or flight hours (flying hours)
on the part specified in the ``Mandatory Life Limits'' column in
Subject 05-10-10, or within 90 days after the effective date of this
AD, whichever occurs later.
    (2) For structurally significant item tasks specified in Subject
05-10-10, ``Airworthiness Limitations,'' of Chapter 05,
``Airworthiness Limitations,'' of the BAE Systems (Operations)
Limited J41 AMM, Revision 38, dated September 15, 2013: Prior to the
accumulation of the applicable flight cycles specified in the
``Initial Inspection'' column in Subject 05-10-10, or within 90 days
after the effective date of this AD, whichever occurs later.
    (3) For certification maintenance requirements tasks specified
in Subject 05-10-20, ``Certification Maintenance Requirements,'' of
Chapter 05, ``Airworthiness Limitations,'' of the BAE Systems
(Operations) Limited J41 AMM, Revision 38, dated September 15, 2013:
Prior to the accumulation of the applicable flight hours specified
in the ``Time Between Checks'' column in Subject 05-10-20, or within
90 days after the effective date of this AD, whichever occurs later;
except for tasks that specify ``first flight of the day'' in the
``Time Between Checks'' column in Subject 05-10-20, the initial
compliance time is the first flight of the next day after doing the
revision required by paragraph (j) of this AD, or within 90 days the
effective date of this AD, whichever occurs later.

(j) New Restrictions on Alternative Actions, Intervals, and/or (CDCCLs)

    After the maintenance or inspection program, as applicable, has
been revised as required by paragraph (i) of this AD, no alternative
actions (e.g., inspections), intervals, and/or CDCCLs may be used
unless the actions, intervals, and/or CDCCLs are approved as an AMOC
in accordance with the procedures specified in paragraph (l) of this
AD.

(k) Credit for Previous Actions

    This paragraph restates the provisions of paragraph (j) of AD
2011-21-06, Amendment 39-16829 (76 FR 64788, October 19, 2011). This
paragraph provides credit for actions required by paragraph (g) of
this AD, if those actions were performed before November 23, 2011
(the effective date of AD 2011-21-06), in accordance with Subjects
05-10-10, ``Airworthiness Limitations''; 05-10-20, ``Certification
Maintenance Requirements''; and 05-10-30, ``Critical Design
Configuration Control Limitations (CDCCL)--Fuel System''; of Chapter
05, ``Airworthiness Limitations,'' of the BAE Systems (Operations)
Limited Jetstream Series 4100 AMM, Revision 33, dated February 15,
2010; which are not incorporated by reference in this AD.

(l) Other FAA AD Provisions

    The following provisions also apply to this AD:
    (1) Alternative Methods of Compliance (AMOCs): The Manager,
International Branch, ANM-116, Transport Airplane Directorate, FAA,
has the authority to approve AMOCs for this AD, if requested using
the procedures found in 14 CFR 39.19. In accordance with 14 CFR
39.19, send your request to your principal inspector or local Flight
Standards District Office, as appropriate. If sending information
directly to the International Branch, send it to ATTN: Todd
Thompson, Aerospace Engineer, International Branch, ANM-116,
Transport Airplane Directorate, FAA, 1601 Lind Avenue SW., Renton,
WA 98057-3356; telephone:<PHONE_NUMBER>; fax<PHONE_NUMBER>.
Information may be emailed to<EMAIL_ADDRESS>    (i) Before using any approved AMOC, notify your appropriate
principal inspector, or lacking a principal inspector, the manager
of the local flight standards district office/certificate holding
district office. The AMOC approval letter must specifically
reference this AD.
    (ii) AMOCs approved previously for AD 2011-21-06, Amendment 39-
16829 (76 FR 64788, October 19, 2011), are not approved as AMOCs
with this AD.
    (2) Contacting the Manufacturer: As of the effective date of
this AD, for any requirement in this AD to obtain corrective actions
from a manufacturer, the action must be accomplished using a method
approved by the Manager, International Branch, ANM-116, Transport
Airplane Directorate, FAA; or the European Aviation Safety Agency
(EASA); or BAE Systems (Operations) Limited's EASA Design
Organization Approval (DOA). If approved by the DOA, the approval
must include the DOA-authorized signature.

(m) Related Information

    (1) Refer to Mandatory Continuing Airworthiness Information
(MCAI) EASA Airworthiness Directive 2014-0043, dated February 21,
2014, for related information. This MCAI may be found in the AD
docket on the Internet at http://www.regulations.gov by searching
for and locating Docket No. FAA-2015-1279.
    (2) For service information identified in this AD, contact BAE
SYSTEMS (Operations) Limited, Customer Information Department,
Prestwick International Airport, Ayrshire, KA9 2RW, Scotland, United
Kingdom; telephone +44 1292 675207; fax +44 1292 675704; email
<EMAIL_ADDRESS>Internet http://www.baesystems.com/Businesses/RegionalAircraft/index.htm. You may view this service
information at the FAA, Transport Airplane Directorate, 1601 Lind
Avenue SW., Renton, WA. For information on the availability of this
material at the FAA, call<PHONE_NUMBER>.

    Issued in Renton, Washington, on April 29, 2015.
Jeffrey E. Duven,
Manager, Transport Airplane Directorate, Aircraft Certification
Service.
[FR Doc. 2015-11023 Filed 5-7-15; 8:45 am]
 BILLING CODE 4910-13-P


[Federal Register Volume 78, Number 123 (Wednesday, June 26, 2013)]
[Notices]
[Page 38309]
[FR Doc No: 2013-15186]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission

[Docket No. CP13-491-000]

Northern Natural Gas Company; Southern Natural Gas Company,
L.L.C.; Florida Gas Transmission Company, LLC; Notice of Application

    Take notice that on June 4, 2013, Northern Natural Gas Company
(Northern), 1111 South 103rd Street, Omaha, Nebraska 68124; on behalf
of itself, Southern Natural Gas Company, L.L.C., and Florida Gas
Transmission Company, LLC, (collectively, Applicants) filed an
application: under section 7(b) of the Natural Gas Act to abandon in-
place the Matagorda Offshore Pipeline System, located on shore and in
federal and state waters offshore Texas, all as more fully set forth in
the joint application which is on file with the Commission and open to
public inspection. Applicants also request Commission approval to
abandon the services provided with respect to receipt points located on
the facilities proposed for abandonment. This filing may also be viewed
on the Commission's Web site at http://wnn.ferc.gov using the
``eLibrary'' link, select ``Docket '' and follow the
instructions (call<PHONE_NUMBER> or for TTY,<PHONE_NUMBER>).
    Any questions regarding the joint application should be directed
to: Michael T. Loeffler, Senior Director, Certificates and External
Affairs for Northern, 1111 South 103rd Street, Omaha, Nebraska 68124 by
phone<PHONE_NUMBER>.
    There are two ways to become involved in the Commission's review of
this project. First, any person wishing to obtain legal status by
becoming a party to the proceedings for this project should, on or
before the comment date stated below, file with the Federal Energy
Regulatory Commission, 888 First Street NE., Washington, DC 20426, a
motion to intervene in accordance with the requirements of the
Commission's Rules of Practice and Procedure (18 CFR 385.214 or
385.211) and the Regulations under the NGA (18 CFR 157.10). A person
obtaining party status will be placed on the service list maintained by
the Secretary of the Commission and will receive copies of all
documents filed by the applicant and by all other parties. A party must
submit an original and 7 copies of filings made with the Commission and
must mail a copy to the applicant and to every other party in the
proceeding. Only parties to the proceeding can ask for court review of
Commission orders in the proceeding.
    However, a person does not have to intervene in order to have
comments considered. The second way to participate is by filing with
the Secretary of the Commission, as soon as possible, an original and
two copies of comments in support of or in opposition to this project.
The Commission will consider these comments in determining the
appropriate action to be taken, but the filing of a comment alone will
not serve to make the filer a party to the proceeding. The Commission's
rules require that persons filing comments in opposition to the project
provide copies of their protests only to the party or parties directly
involved in the protest.
    The Commission strongly encourages electronic filings of comments,
protests and interventions in lieu of paper using the ``eFiling'' link
at http://www.ferc.gov. Persons unable to file electronically should
submit an original and 7 copies of the protest or intervention to the
Federal Energy regulatory Commission, 888 First Street NE., Washington,
DC 20426. This filing is accessible on-line at http://www.ferc.gov,
using the ``eLibrary'' link and is available for review in the
Commission's Public Reference Room in Washington, DC. There is an
``eSubscription'' link on the Web site that enables subscribers to
receive email notification when a document is added to a subscribed
docket(s). For assistance with any FERC Online service, please email
<EMAIL_ADDRESS>or call<PHONE_NUMBER> (toll free). For
TTY, call<PHONE_NUMBER>.
    Comment Date: 5:00 p.m. Eastern Time on July 10, 2013.

    Dated: June 19, 2013.
Kimberly D. Bose,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2013-15186 Filed 6-25-13; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6717-01-P


[Federal Register Volume 86, Number 176 (Wednesday, September 15, 2021)]
[Notices]
[Pages 51406-51408]
[FR Doc No: 2021-19857]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

[Release No. 34-92912; File No. SR-CBOE-2021-051]

Self-Regulatory Organizations; Cboe Exchange, Inc.; Notice of
Filing and Immediate Effectiveness of a Proposed Rule Change To Amend
Rule 5.52 in Connection With the Minimum Initial Quote Size Requirement
for Market-Makers

September 9, 2021.
    Pursuant to Section 19(b)(1) \1\ of the Securities Exchange Act of
1934 (the ``Act'') \2\ and Rule 19b-4 thereunder,\3\ notice is hereby
given that, on September 2, 2021, Cboe Exchange, Inc. (the ``Exchange''
or ``Cboe Options'') filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission
(the ``Commission'') the proposed rule change as described in Items I
and II below, which Items have been prepared by the Exchange. The
Exchange filed the proposal as a ``non-controversial'' proposed rule
change pursuant to Section 19(b)(3)(A)(iii) of the Act \4\ and Rule
19b-4(f)(6) thereunder.\5\ The Commission is publishing this notice to
solicit comments on the proposed rule change from interested persons.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \1\ 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(1).
    \2\ 15 U.S.C. 78a.
    \3\ 17 CFR 240.19b-4.
    \4\ 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(3)(A)(iii).
    \5\ 17 CFR 240.19b-4(f)(6).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

I. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement of the Terms of Substance
of the Proposed Rule Change

    Cboe Exchange, Inc. (the ``Exchange'' or ``Cboe Options'') proposes
to amend Rule 5.52 in connection with the minimum initial quote size
requirement for Market-Makers. The text of the proposed rule change is
provided in Exhibit 5.
    The text of the proposed rule change is also available on the
Exchange's website (http://www.cboe.com/

AboutCBOE/CBOELegalRegulatoryHome.aspx), at the Exchange's Office of
the Secretary, and at the Commission's Public Reference Room.

II. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement of the Purpose of, and
Statutory Basis for, the Proposed Rule Change

    In its filing with the Commission, the Exchange included statements
concerning the purpose of and basis for the proposed rule change and
discussed any comments it received on the proposed rule change. The
text of these statements may be examined at the places specified in
Item IV below. The Exchange has prepared summaries, set forth in
sections A, B, and C below, of the most significant aspects of such
statements.

A. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement of the Purpose of, and
Statutory Basis for, the Proposed Rule Change

1. Purpose
    The Exchange proposes to amend Rule 5.52(b) to systematically
reject Market-Maker quotes that do not meet the minimum initial quote
size requirement determined by the Exchange.
    Rule 5.52 governs Market-Maker quoting obligations on the Exchange.
Specifically, Rule 5.52(b) provides that a Market-Maker's bid (offer)
\6\ for a series must be accompanied by the minimum number of contracts
determined by the Exchange on a class-by-class basis, the minimum of
which will be one contract at the price of the bid (offer) the Market-
Maker is willing to buy (sell). The proposed rule change updates Rule
5.52(b) to provide that the System rejects a Market-Maker's bid (offer)
that does not meet the minimum initial quote size determined by the
Exchange for that class. Currently, the Exchange's Regulatory Division
conducts surveillances to review for and enforce Market-Maker
compliance with the minimum initial quote size requirements.\7\ By
allowing the System to automatically reject Market-Maker quotes that do
not meet the applicable minimum initial quote requirements for that
class, the proposed rule change is designed to reduce a regulatory
surveillance burden on the Exchange in having to manually surveil for
and enforce Market-Maker compliance with the minimum initial quote size
requirements, thereby allowing the Exchange to reallocate regulatory
resources to other regulatory processes. The proposed rule change will
also serve as an additional risk control for Market-Makers quoting on
the Exchange by reducing the compliance risk associated with
inadvertently submitting a bid (offer) that does not meet the minimum
initial quote size requirement for that class. The Exchange notes, too,
that other Exchange Rules provide for systematically enforced
compliance with certain trading rules and requirements, including order
size requirements.\8\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \6\ Pursuant to Rule 5.52, a Market Maker's quotes must be firm,
two-sided bids (offers) that meet the applicable minimum initial
quote size requirement.
    \7\ Currently, the Exchange has an initial minimum quote size in
place for SPX during Regular Trading Hours (``RTH''). See Regulatory
Circular 20-025, Reinstatement of Minimum Intraday Electronic Quote
Size in SPX (April 2, 2020) available at https://cdn.cboe.com/resources/regulation/circulars/regulatory/RC20-025-Reinstatement-of-Minimum-Intraday-Electronic-Quote-Size-in-SPX.pdf. The minimum size
for all other classes is the default size of one contract.
    \8\ See e.g., Rule 5.66(a), which provides that Trading Permit
Holders shall not effect Trade-Throughs, however, Rule 5.32(c)
provides that the System cancels or rejects an order that would
trade through a Protected Quotation (if not otherwise eligible for
routing or the price-adjust process); and Rule 5.34(c)(3), which
provides that the System cancels or rejects an incoming order or
quote with a size that exceeds the maximum contract size (which the
Exchange determines).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

Statutory Basis
    The Exchange believes the proposed rule change is consistent with
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (the ``Act'') and the rules and
regulations thereunder applicable to the Exchange and, in particular,
the requirements of Section 6(b) of the Act.\9\ Specifically, the
Exchange believes the proposed rule change is consistent with the
Section 6(b)(5) \10\ requirements that the rules of an exchange be
designed to prevent fraudulent and manipulative acts and practices, to
promote just and equitable principles of trade, to foster cooperation
and coordination with persons engaged in regulating, clearing,
settling, processing information with respect to, and facilitating
transactions in securities, to remove impediments to and perfect the
mechanism of a free and open market and a national market system, and,
in general, to protect investors and the public interest. Additionally,
the Exchange believes the proposed rule change is consistent with the
Section 6(b)(5) \11\ requirement that the rules of an exchange not be
designed to permit unfair discrimination between customers, issuers,
brokers, or dealers.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \9\ 15 U.S.C. 78f(b).
    \10\ 15 U.S.C. 78f(b)(5).
    \11\ Id.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    The Exchange believes that, by having the System automatically
reject Market-Maker quotes that do not meet the applicable minimum
initial quote size requirement in a class, the proposed rule change
will remove impediments to and perfect the mechanism of a free and open
market and a national market system, and, in general, will protect
investors. In particular, the Exchange believes that the proposed rule
change will reduce a surveillance burden on the Exchange in having to
manually surveil for and enforce Market-Maker compliance with the
minimum initial quote size requirements, thereby allowing the Exchange
to reallocate regulatory resources into other regulatory functions.
Additionally, the proposed rule change will benefit market participants
by serving as an additional risk control for Market-Makers quoting on
the Exchange and reducing the compliance risk associated with
inadvertently submitting a bid (offer) that does not meet the minimum
initial quote size requirement in that class. The proposed rule change
does not present any new or novel issues or System functionality as
other Exchange Rules provide for systematically enforced compliance
with certain trading rules and requirements, including order size
requirements.\12\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \12\ See supra note 7.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    The Exchange also believes the proposed rule change is consistent
with Section 6(b)(1) of the Act,\13\ which provides that the Exchange
be organized and have the capacity to be able to carry out the purposes
of the Act and to enforce compliance by the Exchange's Trading Permit
Holders and persons associated with its Trading Permit Holders with the
Act, the rules and regulations thereunder, and the rules of the
Exchange, as the System will automatically enforce the minimum initial
quote size requirement for Market-Makers.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \13\ 15 U.S.C. 78f(b)(1).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

B. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement on Burden on Competition

    The Exchange does not believe that the proposed rule change will
impose any burden on competition that is not necessary or appropriate
in furtherance of the purposes of the Act. The Exchange does not
believe that the proposed rule change is competitive in nature, but
rather is designed to enhance the Exchange's enforcement of Exchange
Rules. The proposed rule change is not adding or amending a Market-
Maker quoting obligation; rather, it is merely automating surveillance
of an existing obligation. The Exchange does not believe that the
proposed rule change will impose any burden on

intramarket competition that is not necessary or appropriate in
furtherance of the purposes of the Act because it will apply equally to
all Market-Maker quotes that do not meet the applicable minimum initial
quote size requirement for a class. The Exchange does not believe that
the proposed rule change will impose any burden on intermarket
competition that is not necessary or appropriate in furtherance of the
purposes of the Act because it is related to compliance with quoting
requirements that are applicable only to Market-Makers on the Exchange.

C. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement on Comments on the Proposed
Rule Change Received From Members, Participants, or Others

    The Exchange neither solicited nor received comments on the
proposed rule change.

III. Date of Effectiveness of the Proposed Rule Change and Timing for
Commission Action

    Because the foregoing proposed rule change does not: (i)
Significantly affect the protection of investors or the public
interest; (ii) impose any significant burden on competition; and (iii)
become operative for 30 days from the date on which it was filed, or
such shorter time as the Commission may designate, it has become
effective pursuant to Section 19(b)(3)(A) of the Act \14\ and Rule 19b-
4(f)(6) thereunder.\15\ At any time within 60 days of the filing of the
proposed rule change, the Commission summarily may temporarily suspend
such rule change if it appears to the Commission that such action is
necessary or appropriate in the public interest, for the protection of
investors, or otherwise in furtherance of the purposes of the Act. If
the Commission takes such action, the Commission will institute
proceedings to determine whether the proposed rule change should be
approved or disapproved.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \14\ 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(3)(A).
    \15\ 17 CFR 240.19b-4(f)(6). In addition, Rule 19b-4(f)(6)(iii)
requires a self-regulatory organization to give the Commission
written notice of its intent to file the proposed rule change, along
with a brief description and text of the proposed rule change, at
least five business days prior to the date of filing of the proposed
rule change, or such shorter time as designated by the Commission.
The Exchange has satisfied this requirement.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

IV. Solicitation of Comments

    Interested persons are invited to submit written data, views, and
arguments concerning the foregoing, including whether the proposed rule
change is consistent with the Act. Comments may be submitted by any of
the following methods:

Electronic Comments

     Use the Commission's internet comment form (http://www.sec.gov/rules/sro.shtml); or
     Send an email to<EMAIL_ADDRESS>Please include
File Number SR-CBOE-2021-051 on the subject line.

Paper Comments

     Send paper comments in triplicate to Secretary, Securities
and Exchange Commission, 100 F Street NE, Washington, DC 20549-1090.

All submissions should refer to File Number SR-CBOE-2021-051. This file
number should be included on the subject line if email is used. To help
the Commission process and review your comments more efficiently,
please use only one method. The Commission will post all comments on
the Commission's internet website (http://www.sec.gov/rules/sro.shtml).
Copies of the submission, all subsequent amendments, all written
statements with respect to the proposed rule change that are filed with
the Commission, and all written communications relating to the proposed
rule change between the Commission and any person, other than those
that may be withheld from the public in accordance with the provisions
of 5 U.S.C. 552, will be available for website viewing and printing in
the Commission's Public Reference Room, 100 F Street NE, Washington, DC
20549 on official business days between the hours of 10:00 a.m. and
3:00 p.m. Copies of the filing also will be available for inspection
and copying at the principal office of the Exchange. All comments
received will be posted without change. Persons submitting comments are
cautioned that we do not redact or edit personal identifying
information from comment submissions. You should submit only
information that you wish to make available publicly. All submissions
should refer to File Number SR-CBOE-2021-051, and should be submitted
on or before October 6, 2021.

    For the Commission, by the Division of Trading and Markets,
pursuant to delegated authority.\16\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \16\ 17 CFR 200.30-3(a)(12).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

J. Matthew DeLesDernier,
Assistant Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2021-19857 Filed 9-14-21; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 8011-01-P


[Federal Register: February 10, 2006 (Volume 71, Number 28)]
[Notices]
[Page 7100-7101]
[DOCID:fr10fe06-130]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

[Release No. 34-53233; File No. SR-NASD-2006-019]

Self-Regulatory Organizations; National Association of Securities
Dealers, Inc.; Notice of Filing and Immediate Effectiveness of Proposed
Rule Change To Establish Uniform Order Warning and Rejection Parameters
for the Nasdaq Market Center

February 6, 2006

    Pursuant to Section 19(b)(1) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934
(``Act''),\1\ and Rule 19b-4 thereunder,\2\ notice is hereby given that
on February 3, 2006, the National Association of Securities Dealers,
Inc. (``NASD''), through its subsidiary, The Nasdaq Stock Market, Inc.
(``Nasdaq''), filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission
(``Commission'') the proposed rule change as described in Items I and
II below, which Items have been substantially prepared by Nasdaq.
Nasdaq filed the proposed rule change as a ``non-controversial'' rule
change under Rule 19b-4(f)(6) under the Act,\3\ which rendered the
proposal effective upon filing with the Commission. The Commission is
publishing this notice to solicit comments on the proposed rule change
from interested persons.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \1\ 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(1).
    \2\ 17 CFR 240.19b-4.
    \3\ 17 CFR 240.19b-4(f)(6).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

I. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement of the Terms of Substance
of the Proposed Rule Change

    Nasdaq proposes to establish uniform order warning and rejection
parameters for the Nasdaq Market Center. Nasdaq would like to implement
the proposed rule change on February 6, 2006. The text of the proposed
rule change is available on the NASD's Web site, http://www.nasd.com,

at the NASD's Office of the Secretary, and at the Commission's Public
Reference Room.

II. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement of the Purpose of, and
Statutory Basis for, the Proposed Rule Change

    In its filing with the Commission, Nasdaq included statements
concerning the purpose of, and basis for, the proposed rule change and
discussed any comments it received on the proposed rule change. The
text of these statements may be examined at the places specified in
Item IV below. Nasdaq has prepared summaries, set forth in Sections A,
B, and C below, of the most significant aspects of such statements.

A. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement of the Purpose of, and
Statutory Basis for, the Proposed Rule Change

1. Purpose
    Nasdaq is proposing the establishment of uniform warning and
rejection parameters for orders that, at the time of entry, cross the
best bid/offer in the Nasdaq Market Center. Under the proposal, the
Nasdaq Market Center would provide a warning message \4\ to market
participants that enter an order that is 10% or more away from the
Nasdaq inside, while orders that at the time of entry are 20% or more
away from the inside would be rejected by the system. For orders priced
less than $1.00, Nasdaq is proposing to implement specific penny-based
warning and rejection parameters of $0.10 and $0.20 respectively.
Market orders would not be subject to any price validation, and these
warning and rejection parameters would apply regardless of the method
used by the participant to enter the quote/order into the Nasdaq Market
Center (e.g., FIX, QIX, CTCI or the New Nasdaq Workstation). These
warning/rejection parameters are summarized below:
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \4\ This warning message may be overridden by the entering
party, in which case the order will be allowed entry into the system
and processed in the normal course.

------------------------------------------------------------------------
                                        Warning             Reject
              Price                  (percentage/        (percentage/
                                        amount)             amount)
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Less than $1....................  $.10..............  $.20
$1-$999,999.....................  10%...............  20%
------------------------------------------------------------------------

    The warning and rejection parameters proposed here will be in
effect from 8 a.m. through 4 p.m. eastern time and key off the best
bid/offer prices within the Nasdaq Market Center at the time of order-
entry. Orders entered for participation in Nasdaq's opening and closing
cross processes will not be subject to the proposed warning and
rejection parameters.
    Nasdaq is establishing these parameters in an attempt to mitigate
the negative market-wide impacts resulting from the entry of mis-priced
orders, especially in cases of large system malfunctions resulting in
the submission of numerous mis-priced orders into the public market in
a very short time span. Nasdaq believes that its proposal continues to
allow vigorous price discovery near the inside market while protecting
the integrity of the market from distortions created by the submission
of abnormally priced orders.
2. Statutory Basis
    Nasdaq believes that the proposed rule change is consistent with
Section 15A of the Act,\5\ in general, and Section 15A(b)(6) \6\ of the
Act, in particular, in that it is designed to prevent fraudulent and
manipulative acts and practices, to promote just and equitable
principles of trade, to remove impediments to and perfect the mechanism
of a free and open market and a national market system, and, in
general, to protect investors and the public interest.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \5\ 15 U.S.C. 78o-3.
    \6\ 15 U.S.C. 78o-3(b)(6).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

B. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement on Burden on Competition

    Nasdaq does not believe that the proposed rule change will impose
any burden on competition that is not necessary or appropriate in
furtherance of the purposes of the Act.

C. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement on Comments on the Proposed
Rule Change Received From Members, Participants or Others

    Nasdaq has neither solicited nor received written comments on the
proposed rule change.

III. Date of Effectiveness of the Proposed Rule Change and Timing for
Commission Action

    Because the proposed rule change: (i) Does not significantly affect
the protection of investors or the public interest; (ii) does not
impose any significant burden on competition; and (iii) by its terms,
does not become operative for 30 days after the date of filing, or such
shorter time as the Commission may designate, if consistent with the
protection of

investors and the public interest, the proposed rule change has become
effective pursuant to Section 19(b)(3)(A) of the Act \7\ and
subparagraph (f)(6) of Rule 19b-4 thereunder.\8\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \7\ 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(3)(A).
    \8\ 17 CFR 240.19b-4(f)(6).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    Nasdaq has requested that the Commission waive the 30-day operative
delay period for ``non-controversial'' proposals and make the proposed
rule change effective and operative upon filing. The Commission
believes that waiver of the 30-day operative delay is consistent with
the protection of investors and the public interest, because the
proposed rule change is intended to protect the integrity of the Nasdaq
market by reducing the incidence of the submission of grossly mis-
priced orders into the market. For this reason, the Commission
designates the proposal to be effective and operative upon filing with
the Commission.\9\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \9\ For the purposes only of accelerating the operative date of
this proposal, the Commission has considered the proposed rule's
impact on efficiency, competition and capital formation. 15 U.S.C.
78c(f).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    At any time within 60 days of the filing of the proposed rule
change, the Commission may summarily abrogate such rule change if it
appears to the Commission that such action is necessary or appropriate
in the public interest, for the protection of investors, or otherwise
in the furtherance of the purposes of the Act.

IV. Solicitation of Comments

    Interested persons are invited to submit written data, views, and
arguments concerning the foregoing, including whether the proposed rule
change is consistent with the Act. Comments may be submitted by any of
the following methods:

Electronic Comments

     Use the Commission's Internet comment form (http://www.sec.gov/rules/sro.shtml.
); or     Send an e-mail to<EMAIL_ADDRESS>Please include

File Number SR-NASD-2006-019 on the subject line.

Paper Comments

     Send paper comments in triplicate to Nancy M. Morris,
Secretary, Securities and Exchange Commission, 100 F Street, NE.,
Washington, DC 20549-1090.
    All submissions should refer to File Number SR-NASD-2006-019. This
file number should be included on the subject line if e-mail is used.
To help the Commission process and review your comments more
efficiently, please use only one method. The Commission will post all
comments on the Commission's Internet Web site (http://www.sec.gov/rules/sro.shtml
). Copies of the submission, all subsequent amendments,

all written statements with respect to the proposed rule change that
are filed with the Commission, and all written communications relating
to the proposed rule change between the Commission and any person,
other than those that may be withheld from the public in accordance
with the provisions of 5 U.S.C. 552, will be available for inspection
and copying in the Commission's Public Reference Room. Copies of such
filing also will be available for inspection and copying at the
principal office of the NASD. All comments received will be posted
without change; the Commission does not edit personal identifying
information from submissions. You should submit only information that
you wish to make available publicly. All submissions should refer to
File Number SR-NASD-2006-019 and should be submitted on or before March
3, 2006.

    For the Commission, by the Division of Market Regulation,
pursuant to delegated authority.\10\
Nancy M. Morris,
Secretary.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \10\ 17 CFR 200.30-3(a)(12).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

[FR Doc. E6-1830 Filed 2-9-06; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 8010-01-P


[Federal Register Volume 87, Number 129 (Thursday, July 7, 2022)]
[Notices]
[Pages 40580-40581]
[FR Doc No: 2022-14463]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION

Federal Aviation Administration

Public Notice for a Change in Use of Aeronautical Property and
Long-Term Lease Approval at Pittsburgh International Airport (PIT),
Pittsburgh, PA

AGENCY: Federal Aviation Administration (FAA), DOT.

ACTION: Notice of a request for a change in designation of on-airport
property purchased with AIP funding from aeronautical to non-
aeronautical use.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The FAA is requesting public comment on the Allegheny County
Airport Authority's proposal to change 38 acres of airport property at
Pittsburgh International Airport, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania from
aeronautical to non-aeronautical use. A portion of this acreage was
purchased with federal financial assistance through the Airport
Improvement Program under Grant Agreement 3-42-0081-003-1983. This
notice is required to be published in the Federal Register 30 days
before modifying the land-use assurance that requires the property to
be used for an aeronautical purpose.

DATES: Comments must be received on or before August 1, 2022.

ADDRESSES: Comments on this application may be mailed or delivered to
the following address:

Julia Sharma, Project Manager, Allegheny County Airport Authority,
Pittsburgh International Airport, Landside Terminal, 4th Floor Mezz,
Pittsburgh, PA 15231,<PHONE_NUMBER>

and at the FAA Harrisburg Airports District Office:

Charles Sacavage, Project Manager, Harrisburg Airports District Office,
3905 Hartzdale Dr., Suite 508, Camp Hill, PA 17011,<PHONE_NUMBER>

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Charles Sacavage, Project Manager,
Harrisburg Airports District Office, location listed above, (717) 730-
2830. The request for change in designation of on-airport property may
be reviewed in person at this same location.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The following is a brief overview of the
request: The Allegheny County Airport Authority requests to change the
designation of 38 acres of on-airport property from aeronautical to
non-aeronautical use for long-term lease for construction, operation,
and maintenance of warehouse and distribution facilities to be known as
Skyview Business Park. No land shall be sold as part of this land
request. The property metes and bounds are: ``All that certain Lease
Area, Building #1 and Building #2, along with an access road,
associated paved parking, and necessary areas for clearing and grading
for the Skyview Business Park, situated in the Township of Findlay,
County of Allegheny, Commonwealth of Pennsylvania, more particularly
described as beginning at a center point in McClaren Road, variable
width, said point being the northeast corner of Parcel A of the Savekis
Plan No. 2, recorded in Plan Book Volume 125, Page 76, which is
property now or formerly owned by Antoinette L. Vossier, et al. (being
Tax Parcel 693-M-240), said point also being a corner of property now
or formerly owned by The County of Allegheny (being Tax Parcel 696-D-
396); thence N54[deg]32'48'' W 52.09403' to the Point of Beginning;
thence north along the westerly side of McClaren Road to the northeast
corner of Skyview Business Park N11[deg]05'50'' W 145.61305'; thence
the following 7 courses and distances to the northeast corner of
Skyview Building #1 lease: 1. S77[deg]14'18'' W 16.28415'; 2.
S87[deg]16'11'' W 99.2787'; 3. N84[deg]57'14'' W 118.13998'; 4.
N72[deg]56'30'' W 54.85074'; 5. N63[deg]06'11'' W 155.01039'; 6.
N66[deg]09'31'' W 119.35571'; 7. N79[deg]19'32'' W 7.65344'; thence
continuing along the northern boundary of Skyview Building #1 lease the
following 20 courses and distances to northwest corner of Skyview
Business Park: 1. N84[deg]02'09'' W 33.10966'; 2. N75[deg]26'02'' W
32.24644'; 3. N70[deg]33'36'' W 35.44247'; 4. N66[deg]11'39'' W
45.66257'; 5. N56[deg]34'02'' W 30.33074'; 6. N54[deg]44'22'' W
47.25171'; 7. N50[deg]27'57'' W 56.89707'; 8. N52[deg]58'11'' W
54.83322'; 9. N51[deg]41'12'' W 39.63981'; 10. N51[deg]37'58'' W
35.26145'; 11. N52[deg]57'56'' W 80.32992'; 12. N50[deg]36'58'' W
52.19505'; 13. N55[deg]20'55'' W 99.1901'; 14. N59[deg]54'58'' W
100.54001'; 15. N63[deg]18'09'' W 116.1815'; 16. N68[deg]57'45'' W
133.7068'; 17. N74[deg]54'41'' W 126.76494'; 18. N78[deg]01'52'' W
84.71001'; 19. N78[deg]01'52'' W 34.63081'; 20. N85[deg]20'45'' W
45.95006'; thence in a southerly direction to the southwest corner of
Skyview Business Park the following 5 courses and distances: 1.
S36[deg]39'51'' W 972.97714'; 2. S18[deg]29'12'' W 138.38488'; 3.
S1[deg]54'04'' E 111.25513'; 4. S8[deg]45'35'' E 191.21665'; 5.
S12[deg]14'48'' E 158.05714'; thence along the southern boundary of
Skyview Business Park S55[deg]34'57'' E 348.51375' and continuing
N70[deg]40'22'' E 188.72506'; thence continuing N30[deg]15'47'' E
97.0933' along eastern side of Skyview Business Park and continuing the
following 14 courses and distances: 1. N34[deg]06'48'' E 319.51622'; 2.
N56[deg]01'39'' E 99.33959'; 3. N80[deg]59'08'' E 101.84117'; 4.
S85[deg]36'10'' E 113.94664'; 5. S87[deg]24'12'' E 144.53457'; 6.
N88[deg]08'45'' E 100.51457'; 7. N67[deg]35'13'' E 183.43316'; 8.
N41[deg]16'01'' E 48.90713'; 9. N40[deg]34'06'' E 74.0512'; 10.
N40[deg]01'32'' E 48.09366'; 11. N39[deg]59'59'' E 189.31802'; 12.
N64[deg]44'51'' E 95.53055'; 13. N82[deg]46'33'' E 51.62404'; 14.
N89[deg]03'46'' E 33.01131'; thence along the southern boundary of the
access road to Skyview Business Park the following 4 courses and
distances: 1. S65[deg]26'52'' E 19.98406'; 2. S57[deg]16'49'' E
148.47784'; 3. S76[deg]36'28'' E 98.95761'; 4. N86[deg]09'52'' E
246.6246'; to the Point of Beginning, containing 38 acres.'' The 38
acre area requested to be designated as non-aeronautical is currently
vacant and not used or developed. Subsequent to the implementation of
the proposed redesignation, rents received by the airport from this
property must be used in accordance with FAA's Policy and Procedures
Concerning the Use of Airport Revenue, published in the Federal
Register on February 16, 1999. Any person may inspect the request by
appointment at the FAA office address

listed above. Interested persons are invited to comment. All comments
will be considered by the FAA to the extent practicable.

    Issued in Camp Hill, Pennsylvania, June 30, 2022.
Ricky Harner,
Manager, Harrisburg Airports District Office.
[FR Doc. 2022-14463 Filed 7-6-22; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910-13-P


[Federal Register Volume 81, Number 5 (Friday, January 8, 2016)]
[Notices]
[Pages 992-993]
[FR Doc No: 2015-33272]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION

Office of the Secretary

[Docket No. DOT-OST-2015-0211]

30-Day Notice of Request for Renewal of a Previously Approved
Collection

AGENCY: Office of the Secretary (OST), Department of Transportation
(Department) or (DOT).

ACTION: Notice and request for comments.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Office of the Secretary, Office of Small and Disadvantaged
Business Utilization (OSDBU), invites public comments about our
intention to request the Office of Management and Budget's (OMB)
approval to renew a collection. This collection renewal request
includes one Short Term Lending Program (STLP) application used for
both new loan guarantee applicants and renewal loan guarantee
applicants. The information collected in the STLP application will
determine the applicant's eligibility and is necessary to approve or
deny a loan. We are required to publish this notice in the Federal
Register by the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995, Public Law 104-13.

DATES: Comments must be submitted on or before February 8, 2016.

ADDRESSES: You may submit your comments identified by DOT-OST-2015-0211
by any of the following methods:
     Office of Management and Budget, Attention: Desk Officer
for U.S. Department of Transportation, Office of Information and
Regulatory Affairs, Office of Management and Budget, Docket Library,
Room 10102, 725 17th Street NW., Washington, DC 20503.
     email<EMAIL_ADDRESS>     Fax:<PHONE_NUMBER>. Attention: DOT/OST Desk Officer.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: John Ralston, Manager, Financial
Assistance Division, Office of Small and Disadvantaged Business
Utilization, Office of the Secretary, U.S. Department of
Transportation, 1200 New Jersey Avenue SE., Washington, DC 20590,
Routing Symbol S-40,<PHONE_NUMBER> (phone) or<EMAIL_ADDRESS>(email).

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
    Title: Short Term Lending Program Application for a Loan Guarantee.
    OMB Control No.: 2105-0555.
    Background: OSDBU's Short Term Lending Program (STLP) offers
certified Disadvantaged Business Enterprises (DBEs) and other certified
Small Businesses (8a, women-owned, small disadvantaged, HUBZone,
veteran owned, and service disabled veteran owned) the opportunity to
obtain short term working capital at variable interest rates for
transportation-related projects. The STLP provides Participating
Lenders (PLs) a guarantee, up to 75%, on a revolving line of credit up
to a $750,000 maximum. These loans are provided through lenders that
serve as STLP PLs. The term on the line of credit is up to one (1)
year, which may be renewed for five (5) years. A potential or renewal
STLP participant must submit a guaranteed loan application package. The
guaranteed loan application includes the STLP application, checklist,
and instructions. Respondents: Certified Disadvantaged Business
Enterprises (DBEs) and other certified Small Businesses (8a, women-
owned, small disadvantaged, HUBZone, veteran owned, and service
disabled veteran owned) interested in financing their transportation-
related contracts.
    DOT Form 2301-1(REV.1): Short Term Lending Program Application for
Loan Guarantee: A potential or renewal STLP participant must submit a
guaranteed loan application package. The guaranteed loan application
includes the STLP application and supporting documentation to be
collected from the checklist in the application. The application may be
obtained directly from OSDBU, the Regional Small Business
Transportation Resource Centers, from a PL, or online from the agency's
Web site, currently at http://www.transportation.gov/osdbu/financial-assistance/short-term-lending-program.
    Respondents: Small Businesses, 100.
    Frequency: Once.
    Estimated Average Burden per Response: 2 hours.
    Estimated Total Annual Burden Hours: 200 hours.
    Supporting documentation: Required documentation shall include, but
is not limited to, the following items:
    a. Business, trade, or job performance reference letters;
    b. DBE or other eligible certification letters;
    c. Aging report of receivables and payables;
    d. Business tax returns;
    e. Business financial statements;
    f. Personal income tax returns;

    g. Personal financial statements;
    h. Schedule of work in progress (WIP);
    i. Signed and dated copy of transportation-related contracts;
    j. Business debt schedule;
    k. Cash flow projections;
    l. Owner(s) and key management resumes.
    Respondents: Small Businesses, 100.
    Frequency: Once.
    Estimated Average Burden per Response: 12 hours.
    Estimated Total Annual Burden Hours: 1200 hours.

    SUMMARY: The Office of the Secretary, Office of Small and
Disadvantaged Business Utilization (OSDBU), invites public comments on
our intention to request the Office of Management and Budget's (OMB)
approval to renew a collection of the STLP Participating Lender (PL)
forms. The collection involves the use of the ``Short Term Lending
Program Bank Verification Loan Activation Form''; ``Short Term Lending
Program Bank Acknowledgement Extension Request Form''; ``Short Term
Lending Program Bank Acknowledgement Loan Close-Out Form''; ``Guaranty
Loan Status Report''; ``Pending Loan Status Report''; ``Drug- Free
Workplace Act Certification for a Grantee Other than an Individual'';
``Certification Regarding Lobbying for Contracts, Grants, Loans, and
Cooperative Agreements''; ``Office of Small and Disadvantaged Business
Utilization U.S. Department of Transportation Short Term Lending
Program Certification Regarding Debarment, Suspension''; ``Cooperative
Agreement between the U.S. Department of Transportation and the
Participating Lender''; and ``U.S. Department of Transportation Office
of Small and Disadvantaged Utilization Short Term Lending Program
Guarantee Agreement''. The information collected administers the loans
guaranteed under the STLP. The information collected keeps the
Participating Lender's (PLs) in compliance with the terms established
in the Cooperative Agreement between DOT and the PLs. OMB Control No:
2105-0555.
    Background: STLP loans are provided through lenders that serve as
STLP participating Lenders (PL). The STLP provides PLs a guarantee, up
to 75%, on a revolving line of credit up to a $750,000 maximum. As part
of the requirements for approval as a PL, lenders must submit the
following certifications: Drug-Free Workplace Act Certification for a
Grantee Other Than An Individual; Certification Regarding Lobbying for
Contracts, Grants, Loans, & Cooperative Agreement; Office of Small and
Disadvantaged Business Utilization U.S. Department of Transportation
Short Term Lending Program Certification Regarding Debarment,
Suspension. The STLP is subject to budgeting and accounting
requirements of the Federal Credit Reform Act of 1990 (FCRA). The PL
must carry out processes to activate, monitor, service and close out
STLP loans. To fulfill the requirements of FCRA, the PL submits reports
and the following forms to OSDBU.
    Respondents: Participating Lenders that are in the process or have
entered into cooperative agreements with DOT's OSDBU under 49 CFR part
22 DOT-OST-2008-0236 entitled, ``Short Term Lending Program''.
    DOT Form 2303-1: Short Term Lending Program Bank Verification Loan
Activation Form. The PL must submit a Loan Activation Form to OSDBU
that indicates the date in which the loan has been activated.
    Respondents: 100.
    Frequency: Annually, up to five years.
    Estimated Average Burden per Response: \1/2\ hour.
    Estimated Total Annual Burden Hours: 50 hours.
    DOT Form 2310-1: Short Term Lending Program Bank Acknowledgement
Extension Request Form. An extension of the original loan guarantee for
a maximum period of ninety (90) days may be requested, in writing, by
the PL using the STLP Extension Request Form.
    Respondents: 100.
    Frequency: Annually.
    Estimated Average Burden per Response: \1/2\ hour.
    Estimated Total Annual Burden Hours: 50 hours.
    DOT Form 2304-1: Short Term Lending Program Bank Acknowledgement
Loan Close-Out Form. The PL must submit the Loan Close-Out Form to
OSDBU upon full repayment of the STLP loan or when the loan guarantee
expires.
    Respondents: 100.
    Frequency: Annually.
    Estimated Average Burden per Response: \1/2\ hour.
    Estimated Total Annual Burden Hours: 50 hours.
    DOT Form 2305-1: Guaranty Loan Status Report. The PL submits a
monthly status of active guaranteed loans to OSDBU.
    Respondents: 100.
    Frequency: Monthly.
    Estimated Average Burden per Response: 1 hour.
    Estimated Total Annual Burden Hours: 100 hours.
    DOT Form 2306-1: Pending Loan Status Report. The PL submits a
monthly loan(s) in process report to OSDBU.
    Respondents: 100.
    Frequency: Monthly.
    Estimated Average Burden per Response: 1 hour.
    Estimated Total Annual Burden Hours: 100 hours.
    DOT Form 2307-1: Drug-Free Workplace Act Certification for a
Grantee Other than an Individual. The PL certifies it is a drug-free
workplace by executing this certification.
    Respondents: 100.
    Frequency: Once.
    Estimated Average Burden per Response: 15 minutes.
    Estimated Total Annual Burden Hours: 25 hours.
    DOT Form 2308-1. Certification Regarding Lobbying for Contracts,
Grants, Loans, and Cooperative Agreement. The PL certifies that no
Federal funds will be utilized for lobbying by executing this form.
    Respondents: 100.
    Frequency: Once.
    Estimated Average Burden per Response: 15 minutes.
    Estimated Total Annual Burden Hours: 25 hours.
    DOT Form 2309-1. Office of Small and Disadvantaged Business
Utilization U.S. Department of Transportation Short Term Lending
Program Certification Regarding Debarment, Suspension. The PL must not
currently be debarred or suspended from participation in a government
contract or delinquent on a government debt by submitting this form.
    Respondents: 100.
    Frequency: Once.
    Estimated Average Burden per Response: 15 minutes.
    Estimated Total Annual Burden Hours: 25 hours.
    Grand Total Annual Estimation of Burden Hours: 1825.

    Issued in Washington, DC, on December 30, 2015.
Habib Azarsina,
OST Privacy and PRA Officer.
[FR Doc. 2015-33272 Filed 1-7-16; 8:45 am]
 BILLING CODE 4910-9X-P