Significantly Affect Energy Supply, Distribution, or Use'' (66 FR
28355, May 22, 2001) because it is not likely to have a significant
adverse effect on the supply, distribution, or use of energy. Further,
we have concluded that this proposed rule is not likely to have any
adverse energy effects. This proposal will result in the addition of
alkaline scrubbers to certain kilns to reduce SO2 emissions.
We estimate the additional electrical demand to be 6.9 million kWhr per
year by the end of the 5th year.

I. National Technology Transfer and Advancement Act

    Section 12(d) of the National Technology Transfer and Advancement
Act of 1995 (``NTTAA''), Public Law No. 104-113 (15 U.S.C. 272 note)
directs EPA to use voluntary consensus standards (VCS) in its
regulatory activities unless to do so would be inconsistent with
applicable law or otherwise impractical. Voluntary consensus standards
are technical standards (e.g., materials specifications, test methods,
sampling procedures, and business practices) that are developed or
adopted by VCS bodies. NTTAA directs EPA to provide Congress, through
OMB, explanations when the Agency decides not to use available and
applicable VCS.
    This proposed rulemaking involves technical standards. EPA proposes
to use the VCS ASME PTC 19.10-1981, ``Flue and Exhaust Gas Analyses,''
for its manual methods of measuring the content of the exhaust gas.
These parts of ASME PTC 19.10-1981 are acceptable alternatives to EPA
Methods 3B, 6, 6A, 7, and 7C. This standard is available from the
American Society of Mechanical Engineers (ASME), Three Park Avenue, New
York, NY 10016-5990.
    While the Agency has identified 12 other VCS as being potentially
applicable to this rule, we have decided not to use these VCS in this
rulemaking. The use of these VCS would have been impractical because
they do not meet the objectives of the standards cited in this rule.
See the docket for this rule for the reasons for these determinations.
    Under 40 CFR 60.13(i) of the NSPS General Provisions, a source may
apply to EPA for permission to use alternative test methods or
alternative monitoring requirements in place of any required testing
methods, performance specifications, or procedures in the final rule
and amendments.
    EPA welcomes comments on this aspect of this proposed rulemaking
and specifically invites the public to identify potentially applicable
voluntary consensus standards and to explain why such standards should
be used in this regulation.

J. Executive Order 12898: Federal Actions To Address Environmental
Justice in Minority Populations and Low-Income Populations

    Executive Order 12898 (59 FR 7629 (Feb. 16, 1994)) establishes
Federal executive policy on environmental justice. Its main provision
directs Federal agencies, to the greatest extent practicable and
permitted by law, to make environmental justice part of their mission
by identifying and addressing, as appropriate, disproportionately high
and adverse human health or environmental effects of their programs,
policies, and activities on minority populations and low-income
populations in the United States. EPA has determined that the proposed
amendments will not have disproportionately high and adverse human
health or environmental effects on minority or low-income populations
because they would increase the level of environmental protection for
all affected populations without having any disproportionately high and
adverse human health or environmental effects on any population,
including any minority or low-income population. These proposed
standards would reduce emissions of PM, NOX, and
SO2 from all new, reconstructed, or modified affected
facilities at PCP, decreasing the amount of such emissions to which all
affected populations are exposed.

List of Subjects

40 CFR Part 60

    Environmental protection, Administrative practice and procedure,
Air pollution control, Incorporation by reference, Intergovernmental
relations, Reporting and recordkeeping requirements.

40 CFR Part 63

    Environmental protection, Air pollution control.

    Dated: May 30, 2008.
Stephen L. Johnson,
Administrator.
    For the reasons stated in the preamble, title 40, chapter I, of the
Code of Federal Regulations is proposed to be amended as follows:

PART 60--[AMENDED]

    1. The authority citation for part 60 continues to read as follows:

    Authority: 42 U.S.C. 7401, et seq.

Subpart A--[Amended]

    2. Section 60.17 is amended by revising paragraph (h)(4) to read as
follows:

Sec.  60.17  Incorporations by reference.

* * * * *
    (h) * * *
    (4) ANSI/ASME PTC 19.10-1981, Flue and Exhaust Gas Analyses [Part
10, Instruments and Apparatus], IBR approved for Sec.  60.63(i)(2) and
(i)(4) of subpart F, Tables 1 and 3 of subpart EEEE, Tables 2 and 4 of
subpart FFFF, Table 2 of subpart JJJJ, and Sec. Sec.  60.4415(a)(2) and
60.4415(a)(3) of subpart KKKK of this part.
* * * * *

Subpart F--[Amended]

    3. Section 60.62 is amended as follows:
    a. Revising the section heading.
    b. Revising paragraphs (a)(1) and (a)(2)
    c. Adding paragraphs (a)(3) and (a)(4);
    d. Revising paragraphs (b)(1) and (b)(2); and
    e. Adding paragraph (d) to read as follows:

Sec.  60.62  Standards.

    (a) * * *
    (1) Contain particulate matter (PM) in excess of:
    (i) 0.15 kg per metric ton of feed (dry basis) to the kiln (0.30 lb
per ton) if construction, reconstruction, or modification of the kiln
commences after August 17, 1971 but on or before June 16, 2008.
    (ii) 0.086 pound per ton of clinker if construction,
reconstruction, or modification of the kiln commences after June 16,
2008.
    (2) Exhibit greater than 20 percent opacity, except that this
opacity limit does not apply to a kiln subject to the PM limit in
paragraph (a)(1)(i) of this section that uses a bag leak detection
system, ESP predictive model, or a PM continuous emission monitoring
system.
    (3) Exceed 1.50 pounds of nitrogen oxide (NOX) per ton
of clinker on a 30-day rolling average if construction, reconstruction,
or modification of the kiln commences after June 16, 2008.
    (4) For sulfur dioxide (SO2) emissions from a kiln for
which construction, reconstruction, or modification commences after
June 16, 2008:
    (i) Exceed 1.33 pounds per ton of clinker on a 30-day rolling
average; or
    (ii) The owner or operator must reduce SO2 emissions
exiting the kiln by 90 percent or greater.
    (b) * * *
    (1) Contain PM in excess of:
    (i) 0.050 kg per metric ton of feed (dry basis) to the kiln (0.10
lb per ton) if construction, reconstruction, or modification of the
clinker cooler commenced after August 17, 1971 but on or before June
16, 2008.
    (ii) 0.086 pound per ton of clinker if construction,
reconstruction, or modification of the clinker cooler commences after
June 16, 2008.
    (2) Exhibit 10 percent opacity, or greater, except that this
opacity limit does not apply to a clinker cooler subject to the PM
limit in paragraph (b)(1)(i) of this section that uses a bag leak
detection system, ESP predictive model or PM continuous emission
monitoring system.
* * * * *
    (d) If an affected facility subject to this subpart has a different
emission limit or requirement for the same pollutant under another
regulation in title 40 of this chapter, the owner or operator of the
affected facility must comply with the most stringent emission limit or
requirement and is not subject to the less stringent requirement.
    4. Section 60.63 is amended by:
    a. Revising paragraph (a);
    b. Revising paragraph (b);
    c. Revising the first sentence in paragraph (c);
    d. Adding paragraphs (f) through (n) to read as follows:

Sec.  60.63  Monitoring of operations.

    (a) The owner or operator of any portland cement plant subject to
the provisions of this subpart shall record the daily clinker
production rates and kiln feed rates.
    (b) The owner or operator of a kiln or clinker cooler must monitor
PM emissions according to the applicable requirements in paragraph
(b)(1) or (2) of this section.
    (1) For a kiln or clinker cooler that that was constructed,
reconstructed, or modified after August 17, 1971 but on or before June
16, 2008, the owner or operator must:
    (i) Install, calibrate, maintain, and operate in accordance with
Sec.  60.13 a continuous opacity monitoring system (COMS) to measure
the opacity of emissions discharged into the atmosphere from any kiln
or clinker cooler except as provided in paragraph (c) of this section.
Each owner or operator of an affected kiln or clinker cooler for which
the performance test required under Sec.  60.8 has been completed on or
prior to December 14, 1988, must install the COMS within 180 days after
December 14, 1988. The COMS must be installed on each stack of any
multiple stack control device for emissions from any kiln or clinker
cooler. If there is a separate bypass stack installed, the owner or
operator also must install, calibrate, maintain, and operate a COMS on
each bypass stack in addition to the main control device stack; or
    (ii) Install, operate, and maintain a bag leak detection system on
each fabric filter used to control PM emissions according to the
procedures in paragraph (f) of this section; or
    (iii) Install, operate, and maintain an instrument for continuously
monitoring and recording the concentration of PM emissions into the
atmosphere according to the requirements in paragraph (g) of this
section.
    (2) For a kiln or clinker cooler that is constructed, modified, or
reconstructed or after June 16, 2008, the owner or operator must:
    (i) Install, operate, and maintain a bag leak detection system on
each fabric filter used to control PM emissions according to the
requirements in paragraph (f) of this section; and
    (ii) Monitor the performance of any electrostatic precipitator
(ESP) used to control PM emissions according to the requirements in
paragraph (o) of this section; or
    (iii) Install, operate, and maintain an instrument for continuously
monitoring and recording the concentration of PM emissions into the
atmosphere according to the requirements in paragraph (g) of this
section.
    (c) Each owner or operator of a kiln or clinker cooler that was
constructed, reconstructed, or modified on or before June 16, 2008
using a positive-pressure fabric filter with multiple stacks, or a
negative-pressure fabric filter with multiple stacks, or an
electrostatic precipitator with multiple stacks may, instead of
installing the COMS required by paragraph (b)(1)(i) of this section,
monitor visible emissions at least once per day by using a certified
visible emissions observer.* * *
* * * * *
    (f) The owner or operator must install, operate, and maintain the
bag leak detection system according to paragraphs (f) (1) through (3)
of this section.
    (1) Each bag leak detection system must meet the specifications and
requirements in paragraphs (f)(1) (i) through (viii) of this section.
    (i) The bag leak detection system must be certified by the
manufacturer to be capable of detecting PM emissions at concentrations
of 1 milligram per dry standard cubic meter (0.00044 grains per actual
cubic foot) or less.
    (ii) The bag leak detection system sensor must provide output of
relative PM loadings. The owner or operator shall continuously record
the output from the bag leak detection system using electronic or other
means (e.g., using a strip chart recorder or a data logger).
    (iii) The bag leak detection system must be equipped with an alarm
system that will sound when the system detects an increase in relative
particulate loading over the alarm set point established according to
paragraph (f)(1)(iv) of this section, and the alarm must be located
such that it can be heard by the appropriate plant personnel.
    (iv) In the initial adjustment of the bag leak detection system,
you must establish, at a minimum, the baseline output by adjusting the
sensitivity

(range) and the averaging period of the device, the alarm set points,
and the alarm delay time.
    (v) Following initial adjustment, you shall not adjust the
averaging period, alarm set point, or alarm delay time without approval
from the Administrator or delegated authority except as provided in
paragraph (f)(1)(vi) of this section.
    (vi) Once per quarter, you may adjust the sensitivity of the bag
leak detection system to account for seasonal effects, including
temperature and humidity, according to the procedures identified in the
site-specific monitoring plan required by paragraph (c)(2) of this
section.
    (vii) You must install the bag leak detection sensor downstream of
the fabric filter.
    (viii) Where multiple detectors are required, the system's
instrumentation and alarm may be shared among detectors.
    (2) You must develop and submit to the Administrator or delegated
authority for approval a site-specific monitoring plan for each bag
leak detection system. You must operate and maintain the bag leak
detection system according to the site-specific monitoring plan at all
times. Each monitoring plan must describe the items in paragraphs
(f)(2) (i) through (vi) of this section.
    (i) Installation of the bag leak detection system;
    (ii) Initial and periodic adjustment of the bag leak detection
system, including how the alarm set-point will be established;
    (iii) Operation of the bag leak detection system, including quality
assurance procedures;
    (iv) How the bag leak detection system will be maintained,
including a routine maintenance schedule and spare parts inventory
list;
    (v) How the bag leak detection system output will be recorded and
stored; and
    (vi) Corrective action procedures as specified in paragraph (f)(3)
of this section. In approving the site-specific monitoring plan, the
Administrator or delegated authority may allow owners and operators
more than 3 hours to alleviate a specific condition that causes an
alarm if the owner or operator identifies in the monitoring plan this
specific condition as one that could lead to an alarm, adequately
explains why it is not feasible to alleviate this condition within 3
hours of the time the alarm occurs, and demonstrates that the requested
time will ensure alleviation of this condition as expeditiously as
practicable.
    (3) For each bag leak detection system, you must initiate
procedures to determine the cause of every alarm within 1 hour of the
alarm. Except as provided in paragraph (f)(2)(vi) of this section, you
must alleviate the cause of the alarm within 3 hours of the alarm by
taking whatever corrective action(s) are necessary. Corrective actions
may include, but are not limited to the following:
    (i) Inspecting the fabric filter for air leaks, torn or broken bags
or filter media, or any other condition that may cause an increase in
PM emissions;
    (ii) Sealing off defective bags or filter media;
    (iii) Replacing defective bags or filter media or otherwise
repairing the control device;
    (iv) Sealing off a defective fabric filter compartment;
    (v) Cleaning the bag leak detection system probe or otherwise
repairing the bag leak detection system; or
    (vi) Shutting down the process producing the PM emissions.
    (g) The owner or operator of a kiln or clinker cooler using a PM
continuous emission monitoring system (CEMS) to demonstrate compliance
with the emission limit in Sec.  60.62 (a) or (b) must install,
certify, operate, and maintain the CEMS as specified in paragraphs (g)
(1) through (3) of this section.
    (1) The owner or operator must conduct a performance evaluation of
the PM CEMS according to the applicable requirements of Sec.  60.13,
Performance Specification 11 of Appendix B of part 60, and Procedure 2
of Appendix F to part 60.
    (2) During each relative accuracy test run of the CEMS required by
Performance Specification 11 of Appendix B to part 60, PM and oxygen
(or carbon dioxide) data must be collected concurrently (or within a
30-to 60-minute period) during operation of the CEMS and when
conducting performance tests using the following test methods:
    (i) For PM, Method 5 or 5B of Appendix A-5 to part 60 or Method 17
of Appendix A-6 to part 60.
    (ii) For oxygen (or carbon dioxide), Method 3, 3A, or 3B of
Appendix A-2 to part 60, as applicable.
    (3) Procedure 2 of Appendix F to part 60 for quarterly accuracy
determinations and daily calibration drift tests. The owner or operator
must perform Relative Response Audit's annually and Response
Correlation Audits every 3 years.
    (h) The owner or operator of a kiln constructed, modified or
reconstructed on or after June 16, 2008 must install, calibrate,
maintain and operate a permanent weigh scale system, or use another
method approved by the Administrator, to measure and record weight
rates in tons-mass per hour of the amount of clinker produced. The
system of measuring hourly clinker production must be maintained within
5 percent accuracy.
    (i) Each owner or operator subject to the NOX emissions
limit for a kiln in Sec.  60.62(a)(3) shall install, operate,
calibrate, and maintain an instrument for continuously monitoring and
recording the concentration by volume of NOX emissions into
the atmosphere.
    (j) Each owner or operator subject to the SO2 emissions
limit in Sec.  60.62(a)(4) for a kiln shall install, operate,
calibrate, and maintain an instrument for continuously monitoring and
recording the concentration by volume of SO2 emissions into
the atmosphere. If complying with the alternative 90 percent
SO2 emissions reduction emission limit, you must also for
continuously monitor and record the concentration by volume of
SO2 emissions at the wet scrubber inlet.
    (k) The owner or operator of each CEMS required under paragraphs
(i) and (j) of this section, shall install, operate, and maintain each
monitoring system according to Performance Specification 2 (40 CFR part
60, appendix B) and the requirements in paragraphs (k) (1) through (5)
of this section.
    (1) The span value of each NOX monitor shall be set at
125 percent of the maximum estimated hourly potential NOX
emission concentration that translates to the applicable emission limit
at full clinker production capacity.
    (2) The owner or operator shall conduct performance evaluations of
each NOX monitor according to the requirements in Sec.
60.13(c) and Performance Specification 2 of Appendix B to part 60. The
owner or operator shall use Methods 7, 7A, 7C, 7D, or 7E of appendix A-
4 to part 60 for conducting the relative accuracy evaluations. The
method ASME PTC 19.10-1981, ``Flue and Exhaust Gas Analyses,''
(incorporated by reference--see Sec.  60.17) is an acceptable
alternative to EPA Method 7 or 7C of Appendix A-4 to part 60.
    (3) The span value for the SO2 monitor must be set at
125 percent of the maximum estimated hourly potential SO2
emission concentration that translates to the applicable emission limit
at full clinker production capacity.
    (4) The owner or operator must conduct performance evaluations of
each SO2 monitor according to the requirements in Sec.
60.13(c) and Performance Specification 2 of Appendix B to part 60. The
owner or

operator shall use Methods 6, 6A, or 6C of Appendix A-4 to part 60 for
conducting the relative accuracy evaluations. The method ASME PTC
19.10-1981, ``Flue and Exhaust Gas Analyses,'' (incorporated by
reference--see Sec.  60.17) is an acceptable alternative to EPA Method
6 or 6A of Appendix A-4 to part 60.
    (5) The owner or operator must comply with the quality assurance
requirements in Procedure 1 of Appendix F to part 60 for each monitor,
including quarterly accuracy determinations for monitors, and daily
calibration drift tests.
    (l) The owner or operator of each CEMS required under paragraphs
(i) and (j) of this section must operate the monitoring system and
record data during all periods of operation of the affected facility
including periods of startup, shutdown, malfunction, except for
continuous monitoring system breakdowns, repairs, calibration checks,
and zero and span adjustments.
    (1) The owner or operator must obtain emission data for at least 18
hours in at least 22 out of 30 successive kiln operating days. For each
valid hour, the owner or operator also must obtain valid exhaust flow
rate data, as specified in paragraph (m)(6) of this section.
    (2) The owner or operator must meet the requirements of Sec.
60.13(h) when determining the 1-hour averages of emissions data needed
to meet the minimum data requirements specified in paragraph (l)(1) of
this section.
    (m) Each owner or operator of a kiln subject to the NOX
emissions limit in Sec.  60.62(a)(3) or the SO2 emissions
limit in Sec.  60.62(a)(4)(i) or (ii) must install, operate, calibrate,
and maintain an instrument for continuously measuring and recording the
exhaust flow rate to the atmosphere according to the requirements in
paragraphs (m)(1) through (9) of this section.
    (1) The owner or operator must install each sensor of the flow rate
monitoring system in a location that provides representative
measurement of the exhaust gas flow rate at the sampling location of
the NOX and SO2 CEMS, taking into account the
manufacturer's recommendations.
    (2) The flow rate monitoring system must be designed to measure the
exhaust flow rate over a range that extends from a value of at least 20
percent less than the lowest expected exhaust flow rate to a value of
at least 20 percent greater than the highest expected exhaust flow
rate.
    (3) The flow rate monitoring system must have a minimum accuracy of
5 percent of the flow rate or greater.
    (4) The flow rate monitoring system must be equipped with a data
acquisition and recording system that is capable of recording values
over the entire range specified in paragraph (l)(2) of this section.
    (5) The signal conditioner, wiring, power supply, and data
acquisition and recording system for the flow rate monitoring system
must be compatible with the output signal of the flow rate sensors used
in the monitoring system.
    (6) The flow rate monitoring system must be designed to complete a
minimum of one cycle of operation for each successive 15-minute period.
To have a valid hour of data, the flow rate monitoring system must
measure and record at least three of four equally-spaced data values
(or at least 75 percent of the total number of values) for each hour
(not including startup, shutdown, malfunction, or out-of-control
periods).
    (7) The owner or operator must perform an initial calibration of
the flow rate monitoring system according to manufacturer's
recommendations.
    (8) The owner or operator must check the accuracy of the monitoring
system at least once per year according to manufacturer's
recommendations.
    (9) The owner or operator must operate the flow rate monitoring
system and record data during all periods of operation of the affected
facility including periods of startup, shutdown, malfunction, except
for monitoring system breakdowns, repairs, and calibration checks.
    (n) You must monitor the performance of any ESP specified in
paragraph (b)(2)(ii) of this section in accordance with the
requirements in paragraph (o)(1) through (5) of this section.
    (1) You must calibrate the ESP predictive model with each PM
control device used to comply with the applicable PM emissions limit in
Sec.  60.62(a)(ii) or (b)(ii) operating under normal conditions. In
cases when a wet scrubber is used in combination with an ESP to comply
with the PM emissions limit, the daily average liquid-to-gas flow rate
for the wet scrubber must be maintained at 90 percent of average ratio
measured during all test run intervals for the performance test
conducted according to paragraph (o)(1) of this section.
    (2) You must develop a site-specific monitoring plan that includes
a description of the ESP predictive model used, the model input
parameters, and the procedures and criteria for establishing monitoring
parameter baseline levels indicative of compliance with the PM
emissions limit. You must submit the site-specific monitoring plan for
approval by the permitting authority. For reference purposes in
preparing the monitoring plan, see the OAQPS ``Compliance Assurance
Monitoring (CAM) Protocol for an Electrostatic Precipitator (ESP)
Controlling Particulate Matter (PM) Emissions from a Coal-Fired
Boiler.'' This document is available from the U.S. Environmental
Protection Agency (U.S. EPA); Office of Air Quality Planning and
Standards; Sector Policies and Programs Division; Measurement Policy
Group (D243-02), Research Triangle Park, NC 27711. This document is
also available on the Technology Transfer Network (TTN) under Emission
Measurement Center Continuous Emission Monitoring.
    (3) You must run the ESP predictive model using the applicable
input data each boiler operating day and evaluate the model output for
the preceding boiler operating day excluding periods of affected source
startup, shutdown, or malfunction. If the values for one or more of the
model parameters exceed the applicable baseline levels determined
according to your approved site-specific monitoring plan, you must
initiate investigation of the relevant equipment and control systems
within 24 hours of the first discovery of a model parameter deviation
and take the appropriate corrective action as soon as practicable to
adjust control settings or repair equipment to return the model output
to within the applicable baseline levels.
    (4) You must record the ESP predictive model inputs and outputs and
any corrective actions taken. The record of corrective action taken
must include the date and time during which the model output values
exceeded the applicable baseline levels, and the date, time, and
description of the corrective action.
    (5) If after 7 consecutive days a model parameter continues to
exceed the applicable baseline level, then you must conduct a new PM
performance test according to paragraph (o)(1) of this section. This
new performance test must be conducted within 60 days of the date that
the model parameter was first determined to exceed its baseline level
unless a wavier is granted by the permitting authority.
    5. Section 60.64 is amended by:
    a. Revising paragraph (b) introductory text and paragraph (b)(1);
and
    b. Adding paragraphs (b)(5) and (b)(6); and
    c. Adding paragraph (c).

Sec.  60.64  Test methods and procedures.

* * * * *

    (b) The owner or operator must determine compliance with the PM
standard in Sec.  60.62(a)(1) as follows:
    (1) The emission rate (E) of PM must be computed for each run using
the Equation 1 of this section:
[GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] TP16JN08.000

Where:

E = emission rate of particulate matter, kg/ metric ton (lb/ton) of
kiln feed;
Cs = concentration of particulate matter, g/dscm (gr/dscf);
Qsd = volumetric flow rate of effluent gas, dscm/hr (dscf/hr);
P = total kiln feed (dry basis) rate, metric ton/ hr (ton/hr). For
kilns constructed, modified or reconstructed on or after June 16,
2008, p = total kiln clinker production rate; and
K = conversion factor, 1000 g/kg (7000 gr/lb).
* * * * *
    (5) The owner or operator of a kiln (including any associated
alkali bypass and clinker cooler) that is constructed, modified or
reconstructed on or after June 16, 2008, must conduct a performance
test every 5 years following the initial performance test. Kilns
(including any associated alkali bypass and clinker cooler)
constructed, reconstructed, or modified after August 17, 1971, but on
or before June 16, 2008, must conduct a performance test every 5 years.
    (6) Any sources other than kilns (including associated alkali
bypass and cooler) subject to the 10 percent opacity limit must follow
the appropriate monitoring procedures in Sec.  63.1350 of this chapter.
    (c) The owner or operator must calculate and record the 30-day
rolling emission rate of NOX and SO2 as the total
of all hourly emissions data for a cement kiln in the preceding 30
days, divided by the total tons of clinker produced in that kiln during
the same 30-day period using Equation 2 of this section:
[GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] TP16JN08.001

Where:

E = emission rate of NOX or SO2, kg/metric ton
(lb/ton) of clinker production;
Cs = concentration of NOX or SO2, g/dscm (gr/
dscf);
Qsd = volumetric flow rate of effluent gas, dscm/hr (dscf/hr);
P = total kiln clinker production rate, metric ton/hr (ton/hr); and
K = conversion factor, 1000 g/kg (7000 gr/lb).

    6. Section 60.66 is revised to read as follows:

Sec.  60.66  Delegation of authority.

    (a) This subpart can be implemented and enforced by the U.S. EPA or
a delegated authority such as a State, local, or tribal agency. You
should contact your U.S. EPA Regional Office to find out if this
subpart is delegated to a State, local, or tribal agency within your
State.
    (b) In delegating implementation and enforcement authority to a
State, local, or tribal agency, the approval authorities contained in
paragraphs (b)(1) through (4) of this section are retained by the
Administrator of the U.S. EPA and are not transferred to the State,
local, or tribal agency.
    (1) Approval of an alternative non-opacity emission standard.
    (2) Approval of a major change to test methods under Sec.  60.8(b).
A ``major change to test method'' is defined in 40 CFR 63.90.
    (3) Approval of a major change to monitoring under Sec.  60.13(i).
A ``major change to monitoring'' is defined in 40 CFR 63.90.
    (4) Approval of a major change to recordkeeping/reporting under
Sec.  60.7(b) through (f). A ``major change to recordkeeping/
reporting'' is defined in 40 CFR 63.90.

PART 63--[AMENDED]

    7. The authority citation for part 63 continues to read as follows:

    Authority: 42 U.S.C. 7401, et seq.

Subpart LLL--[Amended]

    8. Section 63.1356 is revised to read as follows:

Sec.  63.1356  Sources with multiple emission limits.

    If an affected facility subject to this subpart has a different
emission limit or requirement for the same pollutant under another
regulation in title 40 of this chapter, the owner or operator of the
affected facility must comply with the most stringent emission limit or
requirement and is exempt from the less stringent requirement.

 [FR Doc. E8-12619 Filed 6-13-08; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 6560-50-P


[Federal Register Volume 77, Number 250 (Monday, December 31, 2012)]
[Notices]
[Page 77076]
[FR Doc No: 2012-31461]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY

[ER-FRL-9006-7]

Environmental Impacts Statements; Notice of Availability

    Responsible Agency: Office of Federal Activities, General
Information<PHONE_NUMBER> or http://www.epa.gov/compliance/nepa/
Weekly receipt of Environmental Impact Statements
Filed 12/17/2012 Through 12/21/2012
Pursuant to 40 CFR 1506.9.
    Notice: Section 309(a) of the Clean Air Act requires that EPA make
public its comments on EISs issued by other Federal agencies. EPA's
comment letters on EISs are available at: http://www.epa.gov/compliance/nepa/eisdata.html.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: As of October 1, 2012, EPA will not accept
paper copies or CDs of EISs for filing purposes; all submissions on or
after October 1, 2012 must be made through e-NEPA. While this system
eliminates the need to submit paper or CD copies to EPA to meet filing
requirements, electronic submission does not change requirements for
distribution of EISs for public review and comment. To begin using e-
NEPA, you must first register with EPA's electronic reporting site--
https://cdx.epa.gov/epa_home.asp
EIS No. 20120394, Draft EIS, USFS, OR, Tollgate Fuels Reduction
Project, Umatilla National Forest, Walla Walla Ranger District,
Umatilla and Union Counties, OR, Comment Period Ends: 02/13/2013,
Contact: Kimpton Cooper<PHONE_NUMBER>.
EIS No. 20120395, Draft EIS, USFS, CA, AP Loblolly Pine Removal and
Restoration Project, Andrew Pickens Ranger District, Sumter National
Forest, Oconee County, CA, Comment Period Ends: 02/13/2013, Contact:
Victor Wyant<PHONE_NUMBER>.
EIS No. 20120396, Final Supplement, USACE, CA, Folsom Dam Modification
Project Approach Channel, Providing New or Additional Information on
the Design and Means to Construct the Auxiliary Spillway Approach
Channel, Placer and El Dorado Counties, CA, Review Period Ends: 01/29/
2013, Contact: Tyler Stalker<PHONE_NUMBER>.
EIS No. 20120397, Final EIS, BLM, AK, National Petroleum Reserve--
Alaska (NPR-A) Integrated Activity Plan, North Slope Borough, AK,
Review Period Ends: 01/29/2013, Contact: Serena Sweet<PHONE_NUMBER>.
EIS No. 20120398, Final EIS, NPS, WI, Ice Age Complex at Cross Plains
General Management Plan, Implementation, Ice Age National Scenic Trail,
Dane County, WI, Review Period Ends: 02/26/2013, Contact: John Madden
608-441-5610.
EIS No. 20120399, Draft EIS, USACE, CA, Feather River West Levee
Project, To Reduce Flood Risk in the Sutter Basin, Sutter and Butte
Counties, CA, Comment Period Ends: 02/13/2013, Contact: Jeff Koschak
916-557-6994.
EIS No. 20120400, Draft EIS, USACE, CA, Encinitas-Solana Beach Coastal
Storm Damage Reduction Project, San Diego County, CA, Comment Period
Ends: 02/26/2013, Contact: Lawrence Smith<PHONE_NUMBER>.
EIS No. 20120401, Final EIS, DOE, MA, RI ADOPTION--Cape Wind Energy
Project, Construction, Operation and Maintenance, and Decommissioning
of a Electric Generation Facility, Barnstable, Nantucket and Duke
Counties, MA and Washington County, RI, Review Period Ends: 01/29/2013,
Contact: Matthew McMillen<PHONE_NUMBER>.

    The U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) has adopted the U.S. Department
of the Interior's Mineral Management Service final EIS filed 1/09/2009.
The DOE was not a cooperating agency for the above final EIS.
Recirculation of the document is necessary under Section 1506.3(b) of
the Council on Environmental Quality Regulations.

    Dated: December 26, 2012.
Dawn Roberts,
Management Analyst, Office of Federal Activities.
[FR Doc. 2012-31461 Filed 12-28-12; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6560-50-P


[Federal Register Volume 81, Number 184 (Thursday, September 22, 2016)]
[Notices]
[Pages 65367-65368]
[FR Doc No: 2016-22839]

=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY

Coast Guard

[Docket No. USCG-2016-0848]

National Offshore Safety Advisory Committee

AGENCY: Coast Guard, Department of Homeland Security.

ACTION: Notice of Federal advisory committee meeting.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The National Offshore Safety Advisory Committee and its
Subcommittee will hold meetings in Houston, TX to discuss the safety of
operations and other matters affecting the offshore oil and gas
industry. These meetings are open to the public.

DATES: The Well Intervention Subcommittee of the National Offshore

Safety Advisory Committee will meet on Tuesday, November 1, 2016, from
1 p.m. to 2:30 p.m. and the full Committee will meet on Wednesday,
November 2, 2016, from 8:30 a.m. to 6 p.m. (All times are Central
Daylight Time). These meetings may end early if the Committee has
completed its business, or they may be extended based on the number of
public comments.

ADDRESSES: The meetings will be held at the Offices of Beirne, Maynard
and Parsons, L.L.P., 25th Floor Conference Room, 1300 Post Oak Blvd.,
Houston, TX 77056. Phone<PHONE_NUMBER>.
    For information on facilities or services for individuals with
disabilities, or to request special assistance at the meetings, contact
the individuals listed in the FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT section
as soon as possible.
    Instruction: To facilitate public participation, we are inviting
public comment on the issues to be considered by the Committee as
listed in the ``Agenda'' section below. Written comments for
distribution to Committee members must be submitted no later than
October 14, 2016, if you want the Committee members to be able to
review your comments before the meeting, and must be identified by
docket number USCG-2016-0848. Written comments may be submitted using
the Federal e-Rulemaking Portal at http://www.regulations.gov. For
technical difficulties, contact the individuals listed in the FOR
FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT section of this document. Comments received
will be posted without alteration at http://www.regulations.gov,
including any personal information provided. You may review a Privacy
Act notice regarding the Federal Docket Management System in the March
24, 2005, issue of the Federal Register (70 FR 15086).
    Docket Search: For access to the docket or to read documents or
comments related to this notice, go to http://www.regulations.gov,
insert USCG-2016-0848 in the Search box, press Enter, and then click on
the item you wish to view.
    A public oral comment period will be held during the meeting on
November 2, 2016, and speakers are requested to limit their comments to
3 minutes. Contact one of the individuals listed below to register as a
speaker.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Commander Jose Perez, Designated
Federal Officer of the National Offshore Safety Advisory Committee,
Commandant (CG-OES-2), U.S. Coast Guard, 2703 Martin Luther King, Jr.
Avenue SE., Stop 7509, Washington, DC 20593-7509; telephone (202) 372-
1410, fax<PHONE_NUMBER> or email<EMAIL_ADDRESS>or Mr.
Patrick Clark, telephone<PHONE_NUMBER>, fax<PHONE_NUMBER> or email
<EMAIL_ADDRESS>
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Notice of this meeting is in compliance with
the Federal Advisory Committee Act, Title 5 United States Code
Appendix. The National Offshore Safety Advisory Committee provides
advice and recommendations to the Department of Homeland Security on
matters and actions concerning activities directly involved with or in
support of the exploration of offshore mineral and energy resources
insofar as they relate to matters within U.S. Coast Guard jurisdiction.
    A copy of all meeting documentation including the agenda, any draft
final reports, new task statement and presentations will be available
at https://homeport.uscg.mil/NOSAC no later than October 21, 2016.
Alternatively, you may contact Mr. Patrick Clark as noted in the FOR
FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT section above.

Agenda

Day 1

    The Subcommittee on Well Intervention Activities on the Outer
Continental Shelf will meet on November 1, 2016 from 1 p.m. to 2:30
p.m. (Central Daylight Time) to review, discuss, and formulate
recommendations.

Day 2

    The National Offshore Safety Advisory full Committee will hold a
public meeting on November 2, 2016 from 8:00 a.m. to 6:00 p.m. (Central
Daylight Time) to review and discuss the progress of, and any reports
and recommendations received from, the above listed Subcommittee from
their deliberations on November 1, 2016. The Committee will then use
this information and consider public comments in formulating
recommendations to the U.S. Coast Guard. Public comments or questions
will be taken at the discretion of the Designated Federal Officer
during the discussion and recommendation portions of the meeting and
during the public comment period, see Agenda item (6).
    A complete agenda for November 2, 2016 Committee meeting is as
follows:
    (1) Welcoming remarks.
    (2) General Administration and accept minutes from March 2016
National Offshore Safety Advisory Committee public meeting.
    (3) Current Business--Presentation and discussion of updates and a
final report to include recommendations from the Subcommittee on Well
Intervention.
    (4) New Business.
    (a) Discussion of any new business items.
    (b) Introduction of a task statement requesting National Offshore
Safety Advisory Committee's input on the draft Navigation and Vessel
Inspection Circular on Cyber Security for Marine Operations on the U.S.
Outer Continental Shelf.
    (5) Presentations on the following matters:
    (a) Eighth Coast Guard District Officer in Charge Marine Inspection
Risk Based Inspection Program;
    (b) Oil Companies International Marine Forum presentation on their
Offshore Vessel Inspection Database Program;
    (c) Update from the Bureau of Safety and Environmental Enforcement;
    (d) Strengthening the Safety Culture of the Offshore Oil and Gas
Industry Report presented by representatives from the Transportation
Research Board.
    (6) Public comment period.

Minutes

    Meeting minutes from this public meeting will be available for
public view and copying within 90 days following the close of the
meeting at the https://homeport.uscg.mil/NOSAC Web site.

    Dated: September 7, 2016.
J.G. Lantz,
Director of Commercial Regulations and Standards.
[FR Doc. 2016-22839 Filed 9-21-16; 8:45 am]
 BILLING CODE 9110-04-P


[Federal Register: December 29, 2009 (Volume 74, Number 248)]
[Proposed Rules]
[Page 68741-68743]
[DOCID:fr29de09-29]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION

Federal Aviation Administration

14 CFR Part 39

[Docket No. FAA-2009-1214; Directorate Identifier 2009-NM-091-AD]
RIN 2120-AA64

Airworthiness Directives; Bombardier, Inc. (Type Certificate
Previously Held by Avro International Aerospace Division; British
Aerospace, PLC; British Aerospace Commercial Aircraft Limited; British
Aerospace (England)) Model BD-100-1A10 (Challenger 300) Airplanes

AGENCY: Federal Aviation Administration (FAA), DOT.

ACTION: Notice of proposed rulemaking (NPRM).

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: We propose to adopt a new airworthiness directive (AD) for the
products listed above. This proposed AD results from mandatory
continuing airworthiness information (MCAI) originated by an aviation
authority of another country to identify and correct an unsafe
condition on an aviation product. The MCAI describes the unsafe
condition as:

    There has been an incident during a production flight test where
the proximity-sensor electronic unit (PSEU) failed. This resulted in
unannunciated loss of:
     Wheel brakes below 10 knots;
     Thrust reverser;
     Nose wheel steering; and
     Auto-deployment of the multi-function spoilers.
    A similar condition, if not corrected, may result in reduced
controllability of the aircraft upon landing and possible overrun of
the runway.
* * * * *
    The proposed AD would require actions that are intended to address
the unsafe condition described in the MCAI.

DATES: We must receive comments on this proposed AD by February 12,
2010.

ADDRESSES: You may send comments by any of the following methods:
     Federal eRulemaking Portal: Go to http://
www.regulations.gov. Follow the instructions for submitting comments.
     Fax:<PHONE_NUMBER>.
     Mail: U.S. Department of Transportation, Docket
Operations, M-30, West Building Ground Floor, Room W12-140, 1200 New
Jersey Avenue, SE., Washington, DC 20590.
     Hand Delivery: U.S. Department of Transportation, Docket
Operations, M-30, West Building Ground Floor, Room W12-40, 1200 New
Jersey Avenue, SE., Washington, DC, between 9 a.m. and 5 p.m., Monday
through Friday, except Federal holidays.
    For service information identified in this proposed AD, contact
Bombardier, Inc., 400 C[ocirc]te-Vertu Road West, Dorval, Qu[eacute]bec
H4S 1Y9, Canada; telephone<PHONE_NUMBER>; fax<PHONE_NUMBER>; e-mail
<EMAIL_ADDRESS>Internet http://www.bombardier.com. You
may review copies of the referenced service information at the FAA,
Transport Airplane Directorate, 1601 Lind Avenue, SW., Renton,
Washington. For information on the availability of this material at the
FAA, call<PHONE_NUMBER> or<PHONE_NUMBER>.

Examining the AD Docket

    You may examine the AD docket on the Internet at http://
www.regulations.gov; or in person at the Docket Operations office
between 9 a.m. and 5 p.m., Monday through Friday, except Federal
holidays. The AD docket contains this proposed AD, the regulatory
evaluation, any comments received, and other information. The street
address for the Docket Operations office (telephone<PHONE_NUMBER>) is
in the ADDRESSES section. Comments will be available in the AD docket
shortly after receipt.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Bruce Valentine, Aerospace Engineer,
Avionics and Flight Test Branch, ANE-172, FAA, New York Aircraft
Certification Office, 1600 Stewart Avenue, Suite 410, Westbury, New
York 11590; telephone<PHONE_NUMBER>; fax<PHONE_NUMBER>.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

Comments Invited

    We invite you to send any written relevant data, views, or
arguments about this proposed AD. Send your comments to an address
listed under the ADDRESSES section. Include ``Docket No. FAA-2009-1214;
Directorate Identifier 2009-NM-091-AD'' at the beginning of your
comments. We specifically invite comments on the overall regulatory,
economic, environmental, and energy aspects of this proposed AD. We
will consider all comments received by the closing date and may amend
this proposed AD based on those comments.
    We have lengthened the 30-day comment period for proposed ADs that
address MCAI originated by aviation authorities of other countries to
provide adequate time for interested parties to submit comments. The
comment period for these proposed ADs is now typically 45 days, which
is consistent with the comment period for domestic transport ADs.
    We will post all comments we receive, without change, to http://
www.regulations.gov, including any personal information you provide. We
will also post a report summarizing each substantive verbal contact we
receive about this proposed AD.

Discussion

    Transport Canada Civil Aviation (TCCA), which is the aviation
authority for Canada, has issued Canadian Airworthiness Directive CF-
2005-12R1, dated December 23, 2008 (referred to after this as ``the
MCAI''), to correct an unsafe condition for the specified products. The
MCAI states:

    There has been an incident during a production flight test where
the proximity-sensor electronic unit (PSEU) failed. This resulted in
unannunciated loss of:
     Wheel brakes below 10 knots;
     Thrust reverser;
     Nose wheel steering; and
     Auto-deployment of the multi-function spoilers.
    A similar condition, if not corrected, may result in reduced
controllability of the aircraft upon landing and possible overrun of
the runway.
    The original issue of this [Canadian] directive mandated the
introduction of non-normal procedures to the airplane flight manual
(AFM) as an interim corrective action to address PSEU failures.
    Revision 1 of this directive amends the aircraft applicability
and introduces a note providing terminating action, for use at
operator discretion, if the aircraft has incorporated a PSEU with
software version 12 in accordance with Bombardier Service Bulletin
(SB) 100-32-12.

    You may obtain further information by examining the MCAI in the AD
docket.

Relevant Service Information

    Bombardier has issued Temporary Revision TR-39, dated March 2,
2005, to the Bombardier Challenger 300 AFM, CSP 100-1. The actions
described in this service information are intended to correct the
unsafe condition identified in the MCAI.

FAA's Determination and Requirements of This Proposed AD

    This product has been approved by the aviation authority of another
country, and is approved for operation in the United States. Pursuant
to our bilateral agreement with the State of Design Authority, we have
been notified of the unsafe condition described in the

MCAI and service information referenced above. We are proposing this AD
because we evaluated all pertinent information and determined an unsafe
condition exists and is likely to exist or develop on other products of
the same type design.

Differences Between This AD and the MCAI or Service Information

    We have reviewed the MCAI and related service information and, in
general, agree with their substance. But we might have found it
necessary to use different words from those in the MCAI to ensure the
AD is clear for U.S. operators and is enforceable. In making these
changes, we do not intend to differ substantively from the information
provided in the MCAI and related service information.
    We might also have proposed different actions in this AD from those
in the MCAI in order to follow FAA policies. Any such differences are
highlighted in a NOTE within the proposed AD.

Costs of Compliance

    Based on the service information, we estimate that this proposed AD
would affect about 162 products of U.S. registry. We also estimate that
it would take about 1 work-hour per product to comply with the basic
requirements of this proposed AD. The average labor rate is $80 per
work-hour. Based on these figures, we estimate the cost of the proposed
AD on U.S. operators to be $12,960, or $80 per product.

Authority for This Rulemaking

    Title 49 of the United States Code specifies the FAA's authority to
issue rules on aviation safety. Subtitle I, section 106, describes the
authority of the FAA Administrator. ``Subtitle VII: Aviation
Programs,'' describes in more detail the scope of the Agency's
authority.
    We are issuing this rulemaking under the authority described in
``Subtitle VII, Part A, Subpart III, Section 44701: General
requirements.'' Under that section, Congress charges the FAA with
promoting safe flight of civil aircraft in air commerce by prescribing
regulations for practices, methods, and procedures the Administrator
finds necessary for safety in air commerce. This regulation is within
the scope of that authority because it addresses an unsafe condition
that is likely to exist or develop on products identified in this
rulemaking action.

Regulatory Findings

    We determined that this proposed AD would not have federalism
implications under Executive Order 13132. This proposed AD would not
have a substantial direct effect on the States, on the relationship
between the national Government and the States, or on the distribution
of power and responsibilities among the various levels of government.
    For the reasons discussed above, I certify this proposed
regulation:
    1. Is not a ``significant regulatory action'' under Executive Order
12866;
    2. Is not a ``significant rule'' under the DOT Regulatory Policies
and Procedures (44 FR 11034, February 26, 1979); and
    3. Will not have a significant economic impact, positive or
negative, on a substantial number of small entities under the criteria
of the Regulatory Flexibility Act.
    We prepared a regulatory evaluation of the estimated costs to
comply with this proposed AD and placed it in the AD docket.

List of Subjects in 14 CFR Part 39

    Air transportation, Aircraft, Aviation safety, Incorporation by
reference, Safety.

The Proposed Amendment

    Accordingly, under the authority delegated to me by the
Administrator, the FAA proposes to amend 14 CFR part 39 as follows:

PART 39--AIRWORTHINESS DIRECTIVES

    1. The authority citation for part 39 continues to read as follows:

    Authority: 49 U.S.C. 106(g), 40113, 44701.

Sec.  39.13  [Amended]

    2. The FAA amends Sec.  39.13 by adding the following new AD:

Bombardier, Inc. (Type Certificate Previously Held by Avro
International Aerospace Division; British Aerospace, PLC; British
Aerospace Commercial Aircraft Limited; British Aerospace (England)):
Docket No. FAA-2009-1214; Directorate Identifier 2009-NM-091-AD.

Comments Due Date

    (a) We must receive comments by February 12, 2010.

Affected ADs

    (b) None.

Applicability

    (c) This AD applies to Bombardier, Inc. (Type Certificate
previously held by Avro International Aerospace Division; British
Aerospace, PLC; British Aerospace Commercial Aircraft Limited;
British Aerospace (England)) Model BD-100-1A10 (Challenger 300)
airplanes, certificated in any category, serial numbers 20002
through 20153 inclusive.

Subject

    (d) Air Transport Association (ATA) of America Code 32: Landing
gear.

Reason

    (e) The mandatory continuing airworthiness information (MCAI)
states:
    There has been an incident during a production flight test where
the proximity-sensor electronic unit (PSEU) failed. This resulted in
unannunciated loss of:
     Wheel brakes below 10 knots;
     Thrust reverser;
     Nose wheel steering; and
     Auto-deployment of the multi-function spoilers.
    A similar condition, if not corrected, may result in reduced
controllability of the aircraft upon landing and possible overrun of
the runway.
    The original issue of this directive mandated the introduction
of non-normal procedures to the airplane flight manual (AFM) as an
interim corrective action to address PSEU failures.
    Revision 1 of this directive amends the aircraft applicability
and introduces a note providing terminating action, for use at
operator discretion, if the aircraft has incorporated a PSEU with
software version 12 in accordance with Bombardier Service Bulletin
(SB) 100-32-12.

Actions and Compliance

    (f) Unless already done, within 14 days after the effective date
of this AD: Revise the Limitations Section of the Bombardier
Challenger 300 AFM, CSP 100-1, to include the information in
Bombardier Temporary Revision TR-39, dated March 2, 2005, as
specified in the temporary revision. This temporary revision
introduces a procedure for ``PROX SYS FAULT (A)'' and modifies the
``WOW FAIL (C)'' and ``GEAR SYS FAIL (C)'' procedures.

    Note 1: This may be done by inserting a copy of Bombardier
Temporary Revision TR-39, dated March 2, 2005, in the AFM. When this
temporary revision has been included in general revisions of the
AFM, the general revisions may be inserted in the AFM, provided the
relevant information in the general revision is identical to that in
Bombardier Temporary Revision TR-39, dated March 2, 2005.

    Note 2: If the aircraft has incorporated a PSEU, part number (P/
N) 30227-0401, 30227-0402, or 30227-0403, with software version 12,
installed in accordance with Bombardier Service Bulletin 100-32-12,
dated June 4, 2007, it is permissible to follow the revised AFM
procedures included in Bombardier Temporary Revision TR-46, dated
March 27, 2008, in lieu of using Bombardier Temporary Revision TR-
39, dated March 2, 2005, specified in paragraph (f) of this AD.

FAA AD Differences

    Note 3: This AD differs from the MCAI and/or service information
as follows: No differences.

Other FAA AD Provisions

    (g) The following provisions also apply to this AD:

    (1) Alternative Methods of Compliance (AMOCs): The Manager, New
York Aircraft Certification Office (ACO), ANE-170, FAA, has the
authority to approve AMOCs for this AD, if requested using the
procedures found in 14 CFR 39.19. Send information to ATTN: Program
Manager, Continuing Operational Safety, FAA, New York ACO, 1600
Stewart Avenue, Suite 410, Westbury, New York, 11590; telephone 516-
228-7300; fax<PHONE_NUMBER>. Before using any approved AMOC on any
airplane to which the AMOC applies, notify your principal
maintenance inspector (PMI) or principal avionics inspector (PAI),
as appropriate, or lacking a principal inspector, your local Flight
Standards District Office. The AMOC approval letter must
specifically reference this AD.
    (2) Airworthy Product: For any requirement in this AD to obtain
corrective actions from a manufacturer or other source, use these
actions if they are FAA-approved. Corrective actions are considered
FAA-approved if they are approved by the State of Design Authority
(or their delegated agent). You are required to assure the product
is airworthy before it is returned to service.
    (3) Reporting Requirements: For any reporting requirement in
this AD, under the provisions of the Paperwork Reduction Act (44
U.S.C. 3501 et seq.), the Office of Management and Budget (OMB) has
approved the information collection requirements and has assigned
OMB Control Number 2120-0056.

Related Information

    (h) Refer to MCAI Transport Canada Civil Aviation Airworthiness
Directive CF-2005-12R1, dated December 23, 2008; and Bombardier
Temporary Revision TR-39, dated March 2, 2005; for related
information.

    Issued in Renton, Washington, on December 16, 2009.
Stephen P. Boyd,
Acting Manager, Transport Airplane Directorate, Aircraft Certification
Service.
[FR Doc. E9-30651 Filed 12-28-09; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4910-13-P