[Federal Register Volume 81, Number 23 (Thursday, February 4, 2016)]
[Notices]
[Pages 5999-6001]
[FR Doc No: 2016-02073]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission

Combined Notice of Filings #1

    Take notice that the Commission received the following electric
corporate filings:

    Docket Numbers: EC16-65-000.
    Applicants: UIL Holdings Corporation.
    Description: Application for Authority under Section 203 for
internal corporate reorganization of UIL Holdings Corporation.
    Filed Date: 1/28/16.
    Accession Number: 20160128-5346.
    Comments Due: 5 p.m. ET 2/18/16.

    Take notice that the Commission received the following electric
rate filings:

    Docket Numbers: ER10-3232-004; ER14-2871-007; ER16-182-002; ER10-
3244-009; ER10-3251-007; ER14-2382-007; ER15-621-006; ER15-622-006;
ER15-463-006; ER16-72-002; ER15-110-006; ER13-1586-008; ER10-1992-014.
    Applicants: Wheelabrator Shasta Energy Company Inc., Cameron Ridge,
LLC, Cameron Ridge II, LLC, Coso Geothermal Power Holdings, LLC, Oak
Creek Wind Power, LLC,ON Wind Energy LLC, Pacific Crest Power, LLC,
Ridgetop Energy, LLC, San Gorgonio Westwinds II, LLC, San Gorgonio
Westwinds II--Windustries, LLC, Terra-Gen Energy Services, LLC, TGP
Energy Management, LLC, Victory Garden Phase IV, LLC.
    Description: Supplement to December 31, 2015 Triennial Market Power
Analysis of the ECP MBR Sellers.
    Filed Date: 1/27/16.
    Accession Number: 20160127-5595.
    Comments Due: 5 p.m. ET 2/29/16.

    Docket Numbers: ER10-2633-023; ER10-2570-023; ER10-2717-023; ER10-
3140-022; ER13-55-013.
    Applicants: Birchwood Power Partners, L.P., Shady Hills Power
Company, L.L.C., EFS Parlin Holdings, LLC, Inland Empire Energy Center,
LLC, Homer City Generation, L.P.
    Description: Notice of Non-Material Change in Status of the GE
Companies.

    Filed Date: 1/28/16.
    Accession Number: 20160128-5333.
    Comments Due: 5 p.m. ET 2/18/16.

    Docket Numbers: ER12-1308-007.
    Applicants: Palouse Wind, LLC.
    Description: Notice of Change in Status of Palouse Wind, LLC.
    Filed Date: 1/28/16.
    Accession Number: 20160128-5337.
    Comments Due: 5 p.m. ET 2/18/16.

    Docket Numbers: ER14-1656-008.
    Applicants: CSOLAR IV West, LLC.
    Description: Notification of Change in Status of CSOLAR IV West,
LLC.
    Filed Date: 1/28/16.
    Accession Number: 20160128-5351.
    Comments Due: 5 p.m. ET 2/18/16.

    Docket Numbers: ER14-2140-005; ER14-2141-005; ER15-632-003; ER15-
634-003; ER14-2466-004; ER14-2465-004; ER14-2939-002; ER15-1952-002;
ER15-2728-003.
    Applicants: Mulberry Farm, LLC, Selmer Farm, LLC, CID Solar, LLC,
Cottonwood Solar, LLC, RE Camelot LLC, RE Columbia Two LLC, Imperial
Valley Solar Company (IVSC) 2, LLC, Pavant Solar LLC, Maricopa West
Solar PV, LLC.
    Description: Notice of Non-Material Change in Status of the
Dominion Companies.
    Filed Date: 1/28/16.
    Accession Number: 20160128-5359.
    Comments Due: 5 p.m. ET 2/18/16.

    Docket Numbers: ER15-485-001.
    Applicants: New York Independent System Operator, Inc.
    Description: Compliance filing: Compliance establish effective
date--Transmission Shortage Costs to be effective 2/11/2016.
    Filed Date: 1/28/16.
    Accession Number: 20160128-5150.
    Comments Due: 5 p.m. ET 2/18/16.

    Docket Numbers: ER16-804-000.
    Applicants: Southern California Edison Company.
    Description: Sec.  205(d) Rate Filing: GIA and Distribution Service
Agmt for San Gabriel Cogeneration Project to be effective 3/29/2016.
    Filed Date: 1/28/16.
    Accession Number: 20160128-5249.
    Comments Due: 5 p.m. ET 2/18/16.

    Docket Numbers: ER16-805-000.
    Applicants: Thunder Spirit Wind, LLC.
    Description: Tariff Cancellation: Cancellation of MBR Tariff to be
effective 1/29/2016.
    Filed Date: 1/28/16.
    Accession Number: 20160128-5250.
    Comments Due: 5 p.m. ET 2/18/16.

    Docket Numbers: ER16-806-000.
    Applicants: Nassau Energy, LLC.
    Description: Baseline eTariff Filing: Application for Market-Based
Rate Authorization to be effective 3/27/2016.
    Filed Date: 1/28/16.
    Accession Number: 20160128-5253.
    Comments Due: 5 p.m. ET 2/18/16.

    Docket Numbers: ER16-807-000.
    Applicants: Peetz Logan Interconnect, LLC.
    Description: Tariff Cancellation: Notice of Cancellation of Peetz
Logan Interconnect, LLC OATT to be effective 3/29/2016.
    Filed Date: 1/28/16.
    Accession Number: 20160128-5259.
    Comments Due: 5 p.m. ET 2/18/16.

    Docket Numbers: ER16-808-000.
    Applicants: Southern California Edison Company.
    Description: Sec.  205(d) Rate Filing: GIA and Distribution Service
Agmt Wind Stream Operations, LLC to be effective 1/24/2016.
    Filed Date: 1/29/16.
    Accession Number: 20160129-5027.
    Comments Due: 5 p.m. ET 2/19/16.

    Docket Numbers: ER16-809-000.
    Applicants: Pacific Gas and Electric Company.
    Description: Sec.  205(d) Rate Filing: Quarterly Filing of City and
County of San Francisco's WDT SA 275 for Q4 2015 to be effective 4/1/
2016.
    Filed Date: 1/29/16.
    Accession Number: 20160129-5028.
    Comments Due: 5 p.m. ET 2/19/16.

    Docket Numbers: ER16-810-000.
    Applicants: MidAmerican Energy Company.
    Description: Sec.  205(d) Rate Filing: First Revised
Interconnection Agreement--Waverly to be effective 1/29/2016.
    Filed Date: 1/29/16.
    Accession Number: 20160129-5051.
    Comments Due: 5 p.m. ET 2/19/16.

    Docket Numbers: ER16-811-000.
    Applicants: Consumers Energy Company.
    Description: Notice of Cancellation Service Agreement No. 8 of
Consumers Energy Company.
    Filed Date: 1/28/16.
    Accession Number: 20160128-5358.
    Comments Due: 5 p.m. ET 2/18/16.

    Docket Numbers: ER16-812-000.
    Applicants: Public Service Company of New Mexico.
    Description: Tariff Cancellation: Notice of Cancellation of
Transmission Service Agreement to be effective 12/15/2015.
    Filed Date: 1/29/16.
    Accession Number: 20160129-5085.
    Comments Due: 5 p.m. ET 2/19/16.

    Docket Numbers: ER16-813-000.
    Applicants: PJM Interconnection, L.L.C.
    Description: Sec.  205(d) Rate Filing: Amended ISA No. 4012, Queue
No. W1-003/Z1-100/AA1-025 et al to be effective 4/28/2015.
    Filed Date: 1/29/16.
    Accession Number: 20160129-5094.
    Comments Due: 5 p.m. ET 2/19/16.

    Docket Numbers: ER16-814-000.
    Applicants: PJM Interconnection, L.L.C.
    Description: Sec.  205(d) Rate Filing: Revisions to OATT and OA RE
Removing 10% Adder for Offers Greater than $2,000 to be effective 3/29/
2016.
    Filed Date: 1/29/16.
    Accession Number: 20160129-5145.
    Comments Due: 5 p.m. ET 2/19/16.

    Docket Numbers: ER16-815-000.
    Applicants: Midcontinent Independent System Operator, Inc.
    Description: Sec.  205(d) Rate Filing: 2016-01-29 Ramp True-up
Filing to be effective 4/1/2016.
    Filed Date: 1/29/16.
    Accession Number: 20160129-5156.
    Comments Due: 5 p.m. ET 2/19/16.

    Docket Numbers: ER16-816-000.
    Applicants: NSTAR Electric Company.
    Description: Notice of Termination of Service Agreement No. 68
under Schedule 21-NSTAR of the ISO New England OATT filed by NSTAR
Electric Company.
    Filed Date: 1/29/16.
    Accession Number: 20160129-5190.
    Comments Due: 5 p.m. ET 2/19/16.

    Docket Numbers: ER16-817-000.
    Applicants: PJM Interconnection, L.L.C.
    Description: Sec.  205(d) Rate Filing: 4th Quarter 2015 Update to
OA/RAA Member Lists to be effective 12/31/2015.
    Filed Date: 1/29/16.
    Accession Number: 20160129-5193.
    Comments Due: 5 p.m. ET 2/19/16.

    Docket Numbers: ER16-818-000.
    Applicants: ISO New England Inc., New England Power Pool
Participants Committee.
    Description: Sec.  205(d) Rate Filing: Negawatt Membership
Termination Filing to be effective 1/1/2016.
    Filed Date: 1/29/16.
    Accession Number: 20160129-5197.
    Comments Due: 5 p.m. ET 2/19/16.

    Docket Numbers: ER16-819-000.
    Applicants: ISO New England Inc., New England Power Pool
Participants Committee.
    Description: Sec.  205(d) Rate Filing: Revisons to Attachment K
Related to Timing of Regional System Plan Report to be effective 3/29/
2016.
    Filed Date: 1/29/16.
    Accession Number: 20160129-5210.
    Comments Due: 5 p.m. ET 2/19/16.

    Docket Numbers: ER16-820-000.
    Applicants: New England Power Pool Participants Committee, ISO New
England Inc.

    Description: Sec.  205(d) Rate Filing: NAPP Membership Termination
Filing to be effective 1/1/2016.
    Filed Date: 1/29/16.
    Accession Number: 20160129-5212.
    Comments Due: 5 p.m. ET 2/19/16.

    Docket Numbers: ER16-821-000.
    Applicants: Alabama Power Company.
    Description: Sec.  205(d) Rate Filing: AMEA NITSA Rollover Filing
to be effective 1/1/2016.
    Filed Date: 1/29/16.
    Accession Number: 20160129-5213.
    Comments Due: 5 p.m. ET 2/19/16.

    Docket Numbers: ER16-822-000.
    Applicants: Alabama Power Company.
    Description: Sec.  205(d) Rate Filing: SMEPA NITSA and NOA
Amendment Filing to be effective 1/1/2016.
    Filed Date: 1/29/16.
    Accession Number: 20160129-5217.
    Comments Due: 5 p.m. ET 2/19/16.

    Docket Numbers: ER16-823-000.
    Applicants: Alabama Power Company.
    Description: Sec.  205(d) Rate Filing: SEPA Network Agreement
Revision No. 4 Filing to be effective 1/1/2016.
    Filed Date: 1/29/16.
    Accession Number: 20160129-5219.
    Comments Due: 5 p.m. ET 2/19/16.

    Docket Numbers: ER16-824-000.
    Applicants: Duke Energy Progress, LLC.
    Description: Sec.  205(d) Rate Filing: Amendment to NCEMC NITSA SA
No. 134 to be effective 1/1/2016.
    Filed Date: 1/29/16.
    Accession Number: 20160129-5221.
    Comments Due: 5 p.m. ET 2/19/16.

    Docket Numbers: ER16-825-000.
    Applicants: Duke Energy Indiana, LLC.
    Description: Sec.  205(d) Rate Filing: Name Change Filing to be
effective 4/1/2016.
    Filed Date: 1/29/16.
    Accession Number: 20160129-5223.
    Comments Due: 5 p.m. ET 2/19/16.

    Take notice that the Commission received the following electric
securities filings:

    Docket Numbers: ES16-22-000.
    Applicants: International Transmission Company.
    Description: Application pursuant to Section 204 of the Federal
Power Act of International Transmission Company for authorization to
issue debt securities.
    Filed Date: 1/28/16.
    Accession Number: 20160128-5350.
    Comments Due: 5 p.m. ET 2/18/16.

    The filings are accessible in the Commission's eLibrary system by
clicking on the links or querying the docket number.
    Any person desiring to intervene or protest in any of the above
proceedings must file in accordance with Rules 211 and 214 of the
Commission's Regulations (18 CFR 385.211 and 385.214) on or before 5:00
p.m. Eastern time on the specified comment date. Protests may be
considered, but intervention is necessary to become a party to the
proceeding.
    eFiling is encouraged. More detailed information relating to filing
requirements, interventions, protests, service, and qualifying
facilities filings can be found at: http://www.ferc.gov/docs-filing/efiling/filing-req.pdf. For other information, call<PHONE_NUMBER>
(toll free). For TTY, call<PHONE_NUMBER>.

    Dated: January 29, 2016.
Nathaniel J. Davis, Sr.,
Deputy Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2016-02073 Filed 2-3-16; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6717-01-P


[Federal Register Volume 78, Number 45 (Thursday, March 7, 2013)]
[Proposed Rules]
[Pages 14722-14726]
[FR Doc No: 2013-05202]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION

Federal Aviation Administration

14 CFR Part 39

[Docket No. FAA-2008-0618; Directorate Identifier 2007-NM-355-AD]
RIN 2120-AA64

Airworthiness Directives; The Boeing Company Airplanes

AGENCY: Federal Aviation Administration (FAA), DOT.

ACTION: Supplemental notice of proposed rulemaking (NPRM); reopening of
comment period.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: We are revising an earlier proposed airworthiness directive
(AD) for all The Boeing Company Model 777 airplanes. That NPRM proposed
to require performing repetitive operational tests of the engine fuel
suction feed of the fuel system, and other related testing if
necessary. That NPRM was prompted by reports of two in-service
occurrences on Model 737-400 airplanes of total loss of boost pump
pressure of the fuel feed system, followed by loss of fuel system
suction feed capability on one engine, and in-flight shutdown of the
engine. This action revises that NPRM by proposing to revise the
maintenance program to incorporate a revision to the Airworthiness
Limitations Section of the maintenance planning data (MPD) document. We
are proposing this supplemental NPRM to detect and correct failure of
the engine fuel suction feed of the fuel system, which, in the event of
total loss of the fuel boost pumps, could result in dual engine
flameout, inability to restart the engines, and consequent forced
landing of the airplane. Since these actions impose an additional
burden over that proposed in the previous NPRM, we are reopening the
comment period to allow the public the chance to comment on these
proposed changes.

DATES: We must receive comments on this supplemental NPRM by April 22,
2013.

ADDRESSES: You may send comments, using the procedures found in 14 CFR
11.43 and 11.45, by any of the following methods:
     Federal eRulemaking Portal: Go to http://www.regulations.gov. Follow the instructions for submitting comments.
     Fax:<PHONE_NUMBER>.
     Mail: U.S. Department of Transportation, Docket
Operations, M-30, West Building Ground Floor, Room W12-140, 1200 New
Jersey Avenue SE., Washington, DC 20590.
     Hand Delivery: U.S. Department of Transportation, Docket
Operations, M-30, West Building Ground Floor, Room W12-140, 1200 New
Jersey Avenue SE., Washington, DC 20590, between 9 a.m. and 5 p.m.,
Monday through Friday, except Federal holidays.
    For service information identified in this proposed AD, contact
Boeing Commercial Airplanes, Attention: Data & Services Management,
P.O. Box 3707, MC 2H-65, Seattle, WA 98124-2207; telephone 206-544-
5000, extension 1; fax<PHONE_NUMBER>; Internet https://www.myboeingfleet.com. You may review copies of the referenced service
information at the FAA, Transport Airplane Directorate, 1601 Lind
Avenue SW., Renton, Washington. For information on the availability of
this material at the FAA, call<PHONE_NUMBER>.

Examining the AD Docket

    You may examine the AD docket on the Internet at http://www.regulations.gov; or in person at the Docket Management Facility
between 9 a.m. and 5 p.m., Monday through Friday, except Federal
holidays. The AD docket contains this proposed AD, the regulatory
evaluation, any comments received, and other information. The street
address for the Docket Office (phone:<PHONE_NUMBER>) is in the

ADDRESSES section. Comments will be available in the AD docket shortly
after receipt.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Sue Lucier, Aerospace Engineer,
Propulsion Branch, ANM-140S, 1601 Lind Avenue SW., Renton, Washington
98057-3356; phone:<PHONE_NUMBER>; fax:<PHONE_NUMBER>; email:
<EMAIL_ADDRESS>
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

Comments Invited

    We invite you to send any written relevant data, views, or
arguments about this proposed AD. Send your comments to an address
listed under the ADDRESSES section. Include ``Docket No. FAA-2008-0618;
Directorate Identifier 2007-NM-355-AD'' at the beginning of your
comments. We specifically invite comments on the overall regulatory,
economic, environmental, and energy aspects of this proposed AD. We
will consider all comments received by the closing date and may amend
this proposed AD because of those comments.
    We will post all comments we receive, without change, to http://www.regulations.gov, including any personal information you provide. We
will also post a report summarizing each substantive verbal contact we
receive about this proposed AD.

Discussion

    We issued an NPRM to amend 14 CFR part 39 to include an AD that
would apply to all The Boeing Company Model 777 airplanes. That NPRM
published in the Federal Register on June 6, 2008 (73 FR 32253). That
NPRM proposed to require repetitive operational tests of the engine
fuel suction feed of the fuel system, and other related testing if
necessary. That NPRM was prompted by reports of two in-service
occurrences on The Boeing Company Model 737-400 airplanes of total loss
of boost pump pressure of the fuel feed system, followed by loss of
fuel system suction feed capability on one engine, and in-flight
shutdown of the engine. The subject area on Model 777 airplanes is
almost identical to that on the affected Model 737-400 airplanes.
Therefore, those Model 777 airplanes may be subject to the unsafe
condition revealed on the Model 737-400 airplanes.

Actions Since Previous NPRM (73 FR 32253, June 6, 2008) Was Issued

    Since we issued the previous NPRM (73 FR 32253, June 6, 2008), we
have received comments from operators indicating a high level of
difficulty performing the actions in the previous NPRM during
maintenance operations.

Relevant Service Information

    We reviewed Section 9, ``Airworthiness Limitations (AWLs) and
Certification Maintenance Requirements (CMRs),'' D622W001-9, Revision
February 2012, of the Boeing 777 Maintenance Planning Data (MPD)
Document. Among other things, Section 9 describes AWL No. 28-AWL-101,
``Engine Fuel Suction Feed Operational Test, of Section D.2., Engine
Fuel Suction Feed System,'' which provides procedures for performing
repetitive operational tests of the engine fuel suction feed of the
fuel system.

Comments

    We gave the public the opportunity to comment on the previous NPRM
(73 FR 32253, June 6, 2008). The following presents the comments
received on the previous NPRM and the FAA's response to each comment.

Requests To Clarify if Engine Fuel Suction Feed Test Is Allowed in Lieu
of the Operational Test

    Airlines for America (A4A) on behalf of its member American
Airlines (AAL), Japan Airlines (JAL), Air New Zealand (ANZ), British
Airways (BA), and Boeing asked that we clarify the engine fuel suction
feed test procedure in the airplane maintenance manual (AMM) as an
option to performing the operational test in the previous NPRM (73 FR
32253, June 6, 2008). AAL and BA asked that we consider adding the
engine fuel suction feed manifold leak-test procedure specified in the
AMM task card as an option to performing the operational test. AAL,
JAL, and ANZ stated that Boeing 777 Task Card 28-020-02-01 specifies
two approved procedures to perform the operational test, but operators
need only one of those to perform the test. JAL also stated that it has
been doing the operational test as specified in MPD Item 28-020-00 or
28-02-01, as applicable; these MPD items identify AMM Task 28-22-00-
710-802, ``Engine Fuel Suction Feed--Operational Test,'' and AMM Task
28-22-15-790-808, ``Engine Fuel Feed and Refuel Manifold Leak
Isolation,'' at 7,500 flight-hour intervals. JAL stated that the two
tasks are equivalent tests and each would satisfy the operations test
requirement of the previous NPRM.
    We agree to provide clarification. The manifold test (Task 28-22-
00-710-801) is not equivalent to the operational test (Task 28-22-00-
710-802) for the purposes of this proposed action. The positive
internal fuel line pressure applied during the manifold test does not
simulate the same conditions encountered during fuel suction feed
(i.e., vacuum), and might mask a failure. Therefore, we have not
changed the supplemental NPRM in this regard.

Request to Extend Compliance Time

    United Airlines (UAL) asked that we extend the compliance time in
the previous NPRM (73 FR 32253, June 6, 2008) from 7,500 flight hours
to 7,500 flight hours or 25 months. UAL stated that this extension
would provide operators the opportunity to do the test during
maintenance checks.
    We agree with the commenter for the reason provided; however,
Boeing has recommended a standardized calendar time for that compliance
time extension of ``Within 7,500 flight hours or 3 years, whichever is
first.'' Therefore, we have changed this supplemental NPRM to revise
the maintenance program to incorporate the AWL identified in Appendix 1
of this AD, which includes an interval of ``7,500 flight hours or 3
years, whichever is first.'' With the exception of including a calendar
time in the task interval, Appendix 1 of this AD is equivalent to AWL
No. 28-AWL-101, ``Engine Fuel Suction Feed Operational Test,'' of
Section D.2., ``AWLS--Fuel Systems,'' of Section 9, ``Airworthiness
Limitations (AWLs) and Certification Maintenance Requirements (CMRs),''
D622W001-9, Revision February 2012, of the Boeing 777 Maintenance
Planning Data (MPD) Document.

Request To Include Corrective Action

    Boeing asked that additional testing, better described as
corrective action, be included in the proposed requirements of the
previous NPRM (73 FR 32253, June 6, 2008). Boeing recommended that
paragraph (f) of the previous NPRM be changed to add corrective actions
in case the engine suction feed operational test is not successful.
    We disagree with the request to include corrective action for this
supplemental NPRM, since the AWL already includes that requirement.
Therefore, we have not changed the supplemental NPRM in this regard.

Request To Clarify Reason for the Unsafe Condition

    Boeing asked that we clarify the reason for the unsafe condition
identified in the previous NPRM (73 FR 32253, June 6, 2008). Boeing
asked that the AD include the results from a report of in-service
occurrences of loss of fuel system suction feed capability on one
engine, due to two in-service engine flameout events on a Model 737-400
airplane while operating on suction feed with undetected air leak
failures. Boeing

stated that there are no known reports of any engine flameout related
to events on Model 777 airplanes. Boeing acknowledged that undetected
air leaks could exist and that this maintenance procedure is a
proactive measure to ensure engine flameout will not occur during
suction feed operation.
    We agree to clarify the unsafe condition. We have revised the
Summary section and paragraph (e) of this supplemental NPRM
accordingly.

Requests for Changes to Certain Maintenance Document References

    Boeing asked that we remove the AMM reference to Section 28-22-00
specified in paragraph (f) of the previous NPRM (73 FR 32253, June 6,
2008). Boeing stated that the AMM is covered in Boeing 777 Task Card
28-020-02-01, and noted that having fewer references included lessens
the chance of errors. UAL asked that we specify using the task card or
the AMM, but not require using both. UAL also noted that the AMM
reference to the General Description section of the AMM is incorrect.
UAL stated that the correct reference is in Section 28-22-00, titled
``Engine Fuel Feed System--Adjustment/Test.'' ANZ added that, since the
task cards are extracts from the AMM, the previous NPRM should state
that two methods are approved. BA stated that the task card is already
covered by the AMM, and noted that the task card identified in
paragraph (g) of the previous NPRM applies only to Trent powered
airplanes. Boeing also asked that we consider adding engine specific
task cards for operational tests of the engine fuel suction feed.
    We acknowledge and agree with the commenters concerns regarding the
maintenance documents referenced in the previous NPRM (73 FR 32253,
June 6, 2008). However, these maintenance documents are not FAA
approved and we do not have the publication controls associated with
AD-related service documents. We do not agree with incorporating the
requested changes because we have mandated an FAA-approved document
instead, which should eliminate these issues. We have made no change to
the supplemental NPRM in this regard.

Requests To Allow the Use of Later Revisions of the Maintenance
Documents

    ANZ, BA, and Boeing asked that we allow using later revisions of
the referenced maintenance documents, because those documents could be
revised over time and would require frequent requests for alternative
methods of compliance (AMOCs).
    We do not agree with the request. Allowing later revisions of
service documents in an AD is not allowed by the Office of the Federal
Register regulations for approving materials incorporated by reference.
We have made no change to the supplemental NPRM in this regard.

Request To Revise Costs of Compliance Section

    AAL asked that the cost estimate be changed. AAL stated that the
cost estimate specified in the previous NPRM (73 FR 32253, June 6,
2008) should not reflect labor only, because approximately 10 minutes
of engine run-time will consume roughly 600 pounds of fuel per
operational test. AAL noted that for its current fleet of 47 Model 777
airplanes, this equates to an additional 28,200 pounds of fuel expended
every 7,500 flight hours to accomplish the proposed test.
    We acknowledge the commenter's request. Although fuel is used
during the operational test, we have not received data on the amount of
fuel used during a test. In addition, fuel costs vary among operators.
Therefore, we do not have definitive data that would enable us to
provide a cost estimate for the fuel used. In any case, we have
determined that direct and incidental costs are still outweighed by the
safety benefits of the AD. We have made no change to the supplemental
NPRM in this regard.

FAA's Determination

    We are proposing this supplemental NPRM because we evaluated all
the relevant information and determined the unsafe condition described
previously is likely to exist or develop in other products of the same
type design. Certain changes described above expand the scope of the
original NPRM (73 FR 32253, June 6, 2008). As a result, we have
determined that it is necessary to reopen the comment period to provide
additional opportunity for the public to comment on this supplemental
NPRM.

Proposed Requirements of the Supplemental NPRM

    This supplemental NPRM revises the previous NPRM (73 FR 32253, June
6, 2008), by proposing to revise the maintenance program to incorporate
a revision to the Airworthiness Limitations Section of the MPD
document.
    This supplemental NPRM proposes to require a revision to certain
operator maintenance documents to include new operational tests.
Compliance with these tests is required by 14 CFR 91.403(c). For
airplanes that have been previously modified, altered, or repaired in
the areas addressed by these tests, the operator might not be able to
accomplish the tests described in the revisions. In this situation, to
comply with 14 CFR 91.403(c), the operator must request approval for an
AMOC according to the procedures specified in paragraph (j) of this AD.
The request should include a description of changes to the required
tests that will ensure the continued operational safety of the
airplane.

Explanation of Change to Costs of Compliance

    Since issuance of the previous NPRM (73 FR 32253, June 6, 2008), we
have increased the labor rate used in the Costs of Compliance from $80
per work-hour to $85 per work-hour. The Costs of Compliance
information, below, reflects this increase in the specified labor rate.

Costs of Compliance

    We estimate that this proposed AD would affect 676 airplanes of
U.S. registry. We estimate the following costs to comply with this
proposed AD:

                                                 Estimated Costs
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
              Action                       Labor cost           Cost per product       Cost on U.S. operators
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Maintenance Program Revision.....  1 work-hour x $85 per      $85 per test........  $57,460, per test.
                                    hour = $85.
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

    We have received no definitive data that would enable us to provide
a cost estimate for the on-condition actions or the optional
terminating action specified in this AD.

Authority for This Rulemaking

    Title 49 of the United States Code specifies the FAA's authority to
issue rules on aviation safety. Subtitle I, section 106, describes the
authority of the FAA Administrator. ``Subtitle VII: Aviation Programs''
describes in more detail the scope of the Agency's authority.
    We are issuing this rulemaking under the authority described in
Subtitle VII, Part A, Subpart III, Section 44701: ``General
requirements.'' Under that section, Congress charges the FAA with
promoting safe flight of civil aircraft in air commerce by prescribing
regulations for practices, methods, and procedures the Administrator
finds necessary for safety in air commerce. This regulation is within
the scope of that authority because it addresses an unsafe condition
that is likely to exist or develop on products identified in this
rulemaking action.

Regulatory Findings

    We determined that this proposed AD would not have federalism
implications under Executive Order 13132. This proposed AD would not
have a substantial direct effect on the States, on the relationship
between the national Government and the States, or on the distribution
of power and responsibilities among the various levels of government.
    For the reasons discussed above, I certify this proposed
regulation:
    (1) Is not a ``significant regulatory action'' under Executive
Order 12866,
    (2) Is not a ``significant rule'' under the DOT Regulatory Policies
and Procedures (44 FR 11034, February 26, 1979),
    (3) Will not affect intrastate aviation in Alaska, and
    (4) Will not have a significant economic impact, positive or
negative, on a substantial number of small entities under the criteria
of the Regulatory Flexibility Act.

List of Subjects in 14 CFR Part 39

    Air transportation, Aircraft, Aviation safety, Incorporation by
reference, Safety.

The Proposed Amendment

    Accordingly, under the authority delegated to me by the
Administrator, the FAA proposes to amend 14 CFR part 39 as follows:

PART 39--AIRWORTHINESS DIRECTIVES

0
1. The authority citation for part 39 continues to read as follows:

    Authority:  49 U.S.C. 106(g), 40113, 44701.

Sec.  39.13  [Amended]

0
2. The FAA amends Sec.  39.13 by adding the following new airworthiness
directive (AD):

The Boeing Company: Docket No. FAA-2008-0618; Directorate Identifier
2007-NM-355-AD.

(a) Comments Due Date

    We must receive comments by April 22, 2013.

(b) Affected ADs

    None.

(c) Applicability

    This AD applies to all The Boeing Company Model 777-200, -200LR,
-300, and -300ER series airplanes, certificated in any category.

(d) Subject

    Joint Aircraft System Component (JASC)/Air Transport Association
(ATA) of America Code 2800, Aircraft Fuel System.

(e) Unsafe Condition

    This AD was prompted by reports of two in-service occurrences on
Model 737-400 airplanes of total loss of boost pump pressure of the
fuel feed system, followed by loss of fuel system suction feed
capability on one engine, and in-flight shutdown of the engine. We
are issuing this AD to detect and correct failure of the engine fuel
suction feed of the fuel system, which, in the event of total loss
of the fuel boost pumps, could result in dual engine flameout,
inability to restart the engines, and consequent forced landing of
the airplane.

(f) Compliance

    Comply with this AD within the compliance times specified,
unless already done.

(g) Maintenance Program Revision

    Within 90 days after the effective date of this AD: Revise the
maintenance program to incorporate the Airworthiness Limitation
(AWL) identified in Appendix 1 of this AD. The initial compliance
time for accomplishing AWL No. AWL-28-101 is within 7,500 flight
hours or 3 years after the effective date of this AD, whichever is
first.

(h) No Alternative Actions, Intervals, and/or Critical Design
Configuration Control Limitations (CDCCLs)

    After accomplishing the revision required by paragraph (g) of
this AD, no alternative actions (e.g., tests), intervals, or CDCCLs
may be used unless the actions, intervals, or CDCCLs are approved as
an alternative method of compliance (AMOC) in accordance with the
procedures specified in paragraph (j) of this AD.

(i) Credit for Incorporating Previous Maintenance Program Revision

    This paragraph provides credit for the actions required by
paragraph (g) of this AD, if those actions were performed before the
effective date of this AD using AWL No. 28-AWL-101, Engine Fuel
Suction Feed Operational Test, of Section D.2., AWLS--Fuel Systems
of Section 9, Airworthiness Limitations (AWLs) and Certification
Maintenance Requirements (CMRs), D622W001-9, Revision February 2012,
of the Boeing 777 Maintenance Planning Data (MPD) Document, provided
the revised ``interval'' specified in Appendix 1 of this AD is
incorporated into the existing maintenance program within 90 days
after the effective date of this AD.

(j) Alternative Methods of Compliance (AMOCs)

    (1) The Manager, Seattle Aircraft Certification Office (ACO),
FAA, has the authority to approve AMOCs for this AD, if requested
using the procedures found in 14 CFR 39.19. In accordance with 14
CFR 39.19, send your request to your principal inspector or local
Flight Standards District Office, as appropriate. If sending
information directly to the manager of the ACO, send it to the
attention of the person identified in the Related Information
section of this AD. Information may be emailed to<EMAIL_ADDRESS>    (2) Before using any approved AMOC, notify your appropriate
principal inspector, or lacking a principal inspector, the manager
of the local flight standards district office/certificate holding
district office.

(k) Related Information

    (1) For more information about this AD, contact Sue Lucier,
Aerospace Engineer, Propulsion Branch, ANM-140S, 1601 Lind Avenue
SW., Renton, Washington 98057-3356; phone:<PHONE_NUMBER>; fax: 425-
917-6590; email<EMAIL_ADDRESS>    (2) For service information identified in this AD, contact
Boeing Commercial Airplanes, Attention: Data & Services Management,
P.O. Box 3707, MC 2H-65, Seattle, WA 98124-2207; telephone 206-544-
5000, extension 1; fax<PHONE_NUMBER>; Internet https://www.myboeingfleet.com. You may review copies of the referenced
service information at the FAA, Transport Airplane Directorate, 1601
Lind Avenue SW., Renton, Washington. For information on the
availability of this material at the FAA, call<PHONE_NUMBER>.

                                                   Appendix 1
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
             AWL No.                  Task          Interval          Applicability            Description
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
28-AWL-101.......................  ALI......  7,500 FH or 3        ALL................  Engine Fuel Suction Feed
                                               years, whichever                          Operational Test.
                                               is first.
                                                                                An Engine Fuel Suction
                                                                                Feed Operational Test
                                                                                must be accomplished
                                                                                successfully on each
                                                                                engine individually.
                                                                                This test is required in
                                                                                order to protect against
                                                                                engine flameout during
                                                                                suction feed operations,
                                                                                and must meet the
                                                                                following requirements
                                                                                (refer to Boeing AMM 28-
                                                                                22-00):
                                                                                Fuel Tank Quantity
                                                                                Limitations:
                                                                                Engine No. 1
                                                                                a. The Center Tank
                                                                                Fuel Quantity must
                                                                                not exceed 5,000
                                                                                lbs (2,270 kg).
                                                                                b. The Main Tank
                                                                                No. 1 Fuel
                                                                                Quantity must be
                                                                                between 1,400 lbs-
                                                                                1,600 lbs (600 kg-
                                                                                800 kg).
                                                                                NOTE: Excess fuel
                                                                                can be
                                                                                transferred to
                                                                                Main Tank No. 2.
                                                                                Engine No. 2
                                                                                a. The Center Tank
                                                                                Fuel Quantity must
                                                                                not exceed 5,000
                                                                                lbs (2,270 kg).
                                                                                b. The Main Tank
                                                                                No. 2 Fuel
                                                                                Quantity must be
                                                                                between 1,400 lbs-
                                                                                1,600 lbs (600 kg-
                                                                                800 kg).
                                                                                NOTE: Excess fuel
                                                                                can be
                                                                                transferred to
                                                                                Main Tank No. 1.
                                                                                Test Procedural
                                                                                Limitations:
                                                                                1. The Fuel Cross-
                                                                                Feed Valve must be
                                                                                CLOSED.
                                                                                2. The APU Selector
                                                                                Switch must be OFF.
                                                                                3. Idle Engine Warm-
                                                                                up time of minimum
                                                                                two minutes with
                                                                                Boost Pump ON.
                                                                                4. Idle Engine
                                                                                Suction Feed (Boost
                                                                                Pump OFF) operation
                                                                                for a minimum of
                                                                                five minutes.
                                                                                NOTE: APU may be used
                                                                                to start the engines
                                                                                provided the Fuel
                                                                                Tank Quantity and
                                                                                Test Procedural
                                                                                Limitations are met.
                                                                                The test is
                                                                                considered a success
                                                                                if engine operation
                                                                                is maintained during
                                                                                the five-minute
                                                                                period and engine
                                                                                parameters (N1, N2,
                                                                                and Fuel Flow) do
                                                                                not decay relative
                                                                                to those observed
                                                                                with Boost Pump ON.
                                                                                A suction fee system
                                                                                that fails the
                                                                                operational test
                                                                                must be repaired or
                                                                                maintained, and
                                                                                successfully pass
                                                                                the Engine Suction
                                                                                Feed Operational
                                                                                Test prior to
                                                                                further flight.
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Directorate Identifier 2007-NM-355-AD

    Issued in Renton, Washington, on February 15, 2013.
Kalene C. Yanamura,
Acting Manager, Transport Airplane Directorate, Aircraft Certification
Service.
[FR Doc. 2013-05202 Filed 3-6-13; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910-13-P


[Federal Register: October 24, 2006 (Volume 71, Number 205)]
[Notices]
[Page 62255-62257]
[DOCID:fr24oc06-44]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission

Combined Notice of Filings 1

October 17, 2006.
    Take notice that the Commission received the following electric
corporate filings:
    Docket Numbers: EC07-3-000.
    Applicants: Atlantic City Electric Company; RC Cape May Holdings,
LLC.
    Description: Atlantic City Electric Company and Cape May Holdings,
LLC submit an application for authorization for disposition of an
existing generation facility and related jurisdictional assets.
    Filed Date: October 11, 2006.
    Accession Number: 20061013-0132.
    Comment Date: 5 p.m. Eastern Time on Wednesday, November 2, 2006.

    Docket Numbers: EC07-4-000.
    Applicants: Aquila, Inc.; MEP Pleasant Hill, LLC.
    Description: Aquila Inc. and MEP Pleasant Hill, LLC submits an
application for approval of the transfer of jurisdictional facilities
and existing generation facilities under section 203 of the Federal
Power Act.
    Filed Date: October 12, 2006.
    Accession Number: 20061016-0141.
    Comment Date: 5 p.m. Eastern Time on Thursday, November 27, 2006.
    Take notice that the Commission received the following electric
rate filings.

    Docket Numbers: ER98-1150-009.
    Applicants: Tucson Electric Power Company.
    Description: Tucson Electric Power Co clarifies certain facts
related to the operation of and scheduling of power from the Luna
Facility and to provide generation market power screen analyses.
    Filed Date: October 12, 2006.
    Accession Number: 20061016-0134.

    Comment Date: 5 p.m. Eastern Time on Thursday, November 2, 2006.

    Docket Numbers: ER00-3251-012; ER99-754-014; ER01-1919-009; ER01-
513-016; ER01-513;017; ER01-513-018; ER01-513-019; ER99-2404-009.
    Applicants: Exelon Generating Company, LLC; AmerGen Energy Company,
LLC; Exelon Energy Company; Exelon West Medway, LLC; Exelon Wyman, LLC;
Exelon New Boston, LLC; Exelon Framingham, LLC; Exelon New England
Power Marketing, L.P.
    Description: Exelon Generation Co et al submit a modification of
their market-based tariffs to remove the market behavior rules and
delete the Code of Conduct regarding Public Service Enterprise Group
Incorporated.
    Filed Date: October 13, 2006 and October 16, 2006.
    Accession Number: 20061017-0030.
    Comment Date: 5 p.m. Eastern Time on Friday, November 3, 2006.

    Docket Numbers: ER01-313-004.
    Applicants: California Independent System Operator Corporation
    Description: California Independent System Operator Corp submits
its compliance filing in accordance with Opinion 463-B of FERC's
November 7, 2006 Order.
    Filed Date: October 10, 2006.
    Accession Number: 20061016-0068.
    Comment Date: 5 p.m. Eastern Time on Tuesday, October 31, 2006.

    Docket Numbers: ER03-742-001.
    Applicants: RMKG, LLC.
    Description: RMKG, LLC submits its First Revised Rate Schedule FERC
1 in order to correct the identification and numbering of the document
to its September 5, 2006 filing of the triennial update market power
analysis.
    Filed Date: October 13, 2006.
    Accession Number: 20061016-0069.
    Comment Date: 5 p.m. Eastern Time on Friday, November 3, 2006.

    Docket Numbers: ER03-821-001.
    Applicants: One Nation Energy Solutions, LLC.
    Description: One Nation Energy Solutions, LLC submits its Triennial
Market Power Update.
    Filed Date: October 12, 2006.
    Accession Number: 20061013-0099.
    Comment Date: 5 p.m. Eastern Time on Thursday, November 2, 2006.

    Docket Numbers: ER05-1050-004.
    Applicants: AmerGen Energy Company LLC.
    Description: AmerGen Energy Company LLC submits its final
compliance electric refund report.
    Filed Date: October 4, 2006.
    Accession Number: 20061003-5072.
    Comment Date: 5 p.m. Eastern Time on Wednesday, October 25, 2006.

    Docket Numbers: ER05-1235-003; ER06-847-002.
    Applicants: MidAmerican Energy Company.
    Description: MidAmerican Energy Co. submits a supplement to its
October 2, 2006 compliance filing in accordance with FERC's September
1, 2006 Order.
    Filed Date: October 10, 2006.
    Accession Number: 20061013-0056.
    Comment Date: 5 p.m. Eastern Time on Tuesday, October 31, 2006.

    Docket Numbers: ER06-20-007.
    Applicants: Louisville Gas & Electric Company.
    Description: Louisville Gas & Electric Company and Kentucky
Utilities Company submit a final Withdrawal Fee Calculation provided by
Midwest Independent Transmission Operator, Inc. effective September 1,
2006.
    Filed Date: October 12, 2006.
    Accession Number: 20061016-0119.
    Comment Date: 5 p.m. Eastern Time on Thursday, November 2, 2006.

    Docket Numbers: ER06-1297-001.
    Applicants: Fox Energy Company LLC.
    Description: Fox Energy Company LLC submits First Revised Sheet 1
to its FERC Rate Schedule 2, effective October 11, 2006 under ER06-
1297.
    Filed Date: October 13, 2006.
    Accession Number: 20061016-0117.
    Comment Date: 5 p.m. Eastern Time on Friday, November 3, 2006.

    Docket Numbers: ER06-1401-001.
    Applicants: PJM Interconnection, LLC.
    Description: PJM Interconnection, LLC submits a substitute
Allegheny Ridge Interim ISA, designated as Substitute Original Service
Agreement 1541.
    Filed Date: October 13, 2006.
    Accession Number: 20061016-0115.
    Comment Date: 5 p.m. Eastern Time on Friday, November 3, 2006.

    Docket Numbers: ER06-1434-001.
    Applicants: ISO New England Inc.
    Description: ISO New England Inc submits an Amended Non-Conforming
Market Participant Service Agreement with North America Power Partners,
LLC.
    Filed Date: October 13, 2006.
    Accession Number: 20061016-0118.
    Comment Date: 5 p.m. Eastern Time on Friday, November 3, 2006.

    Docket Numbers: ER07-23-001.
    Applicants: Arizona Public Service Company.
    Description: Arizona Public Service Company submits corrected
Original Sheet 58 to its FERC Tariff, Volume 5.
    Filed Date: October 13, 2006.
    Accession Number: 20061016-0116.
    Comment Date: 5 p.m. Eastern Time on Friday, November 3, 2006.

    Docket Numbers: ER07-32-000.
    Applicants: Mid-Continent Area Power Pool.
    Description: The Mid-Continent Area Power Pool submits revisions to
Article 6 of its Restated Agreement, to be effective December 1, 2006.
    Filed Date: October 6, 2006.
    Accession Number: 20061016-0107.
    Comment Date: 5 p.m. Eastern Time on Friday, October 27, 2006.

    Docket Numbers: ER07-34-000.
    Applicants: Plains End II, LLC.
    Description: Plains End III, LLC submits a petition for order
accepting market-based rate tariff for filing and granting waivers and
blanket approvals and request for expedited action.
    Filed Date: October 12, 2006.
    Accession Number: 20061013-0081.
    Comment Date: 5 p.m. Eastern Time on Thursday, November 2, 2006.

    Docket Numbers: ER07-35-000.
    Applicants: Southern California Edison Company.
    Description: Southern California Edison Co submits revised rate
sheets to the Interconnection Facilities Agreement & the Service
Agreement for Wholesale Distribution Service between the City of Corona
& SCE.
    Filed Date: October 13, 2006.
    Accession Number: 20061017-0035.
    Comment Date: 5 p.m. Eastern Time on Friday, November 3, 2006.

    Docket Numbers: ER06-36-000.
    Applicants: Southern California Edison Company.
    Description: Southern California Edison Co submits Second Service
Sheet 19 et al as part of its Service Agreement 128 under its Wholesale
Distribution Access Tariff, FERC Electric Tariff, Revised Volume 5.
    Filed Date: October 13, 2006.
    Accession Number: 20061017-0034.
    Comment Date: 5 p.m. Eastern Time on Friday, November 3, 2006.

    Docket Numbers: ER07-37-000.
    Applicants: Carolina Power & Light Company.
    Description: Carolina Power & Light Co dba Progress Energy
Carolinas, Inc (PEC) requests that FERC amend the Western Systems Power
Pool Agreement to include PEC as a participant.
    Filed Date: October 13, 2006.
    Accession Number: 20061017-0033.
    Comment Date: 5 p.m. Eastern Time on Friday, November 3, 2006.

    Docket Numbers: ER07-38-000.
    Applicants: Entergy Services Inc.
    Description: Energy Services Inc, on behalf of Entergy Operations
Inc requests FERC to review and authorize the cost allocation methods
included in services agreements used for the sale of non-power goods
and services.

    Filed Date: October 13, 2006.
    Accession Number: 20061017-0032.
    Comment Date: 5 p.m. Eastern Time on Friday, November 3, 2006.

    Take notice that the Commission received the following foreign
utility company status filings:

    Docket Numbers: FC07-3-000.
    Applicants: Tynagh Energy Limited.
    Description: Tynagh Energy Limited submits a Notice of Self-
Certification of Foreign Utility Company Status.
    Filed Date: October 10, 2006.
    Accession Number: 20061016-0112.
    Comment Date: 5 p.m. Eastern Time on Tuesday, October 31, 2006.
    Any person desiring to intervene or to protest in any of the above
proceedings must file in accordance with Rules 211 and 214 of the
Commission's Rules of Practice and Procedure (18 CFR 385.211 and
385.214) on or before 5 p.m. Eastern time on the specified comment
date. It is not necessary to separately intervene again in a subdocket
related to a compliance filing if you have previously intervened in the
same docket. Protests will be considered by the Commission in
determining the appropriate action to be taken, but will not serve to
make protestants parties to the proceeding. Anyone filing a motion to
intervene or protest must serve a copy of that document on the
Applicant. In reference to filings initiating a new proceeding,
interventions or protests submitted on or before the comment deadline
need not be served on persons other than the Applicant.
    The Commission encourages electronic submission of protests and
interventions in lieu of paper, using the FERC Online links at http://www.ferc.gov.
 To facilitate electronic service, persons with Internet

access who will eFile a document and/or be listed as a contact for an
intervenor must create and validate an eRegistration account using the
eRegistration link. Select the eFiling link to log on and submit the
intervention or protests.
    Persons unable to file electronically should submit an original and
14 copies of the intervention or protest to the Federal Energy
Regulatory Commission, 888 First St., NE., Washington, DC 20426.
    The filings in the above proceedings are accessible in the
Commission's eLibrary system by clicking on the appropriate link in the
above list. They are also available for review in the Commission's
Public Reference Room in Washington, DC. There is an eSubscription link
on the Web site that enables subscribers to receive e-mail notification
when a document is added to a subscribed dockets(s). For assistance
with any FERC Online service, please e-mail<EMAIL_ADDRESS>
or call<PHONE_NUMBER> (toll free). For TTY, call<PHONE_NUMBER>.

Magalie R. Salas,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. E6-17784 Filed 10-23-06; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 6717-01-P


 TABLE 8  The Burden and Cost of Federal Activities for the Permanent Program Total 3 Year Total Number of Entities Burden Activity Hours May 2005 Nov 2005 May 2006 Nov 2006 May 2007 Nov 2007 ( Hours) Cost Program Administration 3,500 / PA 1 1 1 1 1 1 21,000 $ 777,000 Permit Application Review 100 / permit 0 0 0 0 0 0 Draft Permit Preparation 150 / permit 0 0 0 0 0 0 Comment Period Notification 10 / permit 0 0 0 0 0 0 Public Hearings 100 / hearing 0 0 0 0 0 0 Analyze Public Comments 40 / permit 0 0 0 0 0 0 Permit Issuance 8 / permit 0 0 0 0 0 0 Permit Revisions Significant Modifications ( 10% of permits) 60 / permit 6 6 6 6 6 6 2,160 $ 79,920 Minor Permit Modifications ( 50% of permits) 20 / permit 27 27 27 27 27 27 3,240 $ 119,880 Administrative ( 50% of permits) 5 / permit 27 27 27 27 27 27 810 $ 29,970 Permit Renewals 60 / permit 17 11 12 6 3 1 3,000 $ 111,000 Review Reports Monitoring 5 / permit 105 105 105 105 105 105 3,150 $ 116,550 Compliance Certification 5 / permit 105 105 105 105 105 105 3,150 $ 116,550 Enforcement Activity 40 / permit 105 105 105 105 105 105 25,200 $ 932,400 TOTAL COSTS 61,710 $ 2,283,270 The wage rate applied was $ 37 per hour.

95 Indian Country permits + 10 Outer Continental Shelf sources


[Federal Register Volume 87, Number 71 (Wednesday, April 13, 2022)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Pages 21752-21755]
[FR Doc No: 2022-07816]

=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY

40 CFR Part 52

[EPA-R03-OAR-2021-0727; FRL-9552-02-R3]

Approval and Promulgation of Air Quality Implementation Plans;
District of Columbia, Maryland, and Virginia; 2017 Base Year Emissions
Inventories for the Washington, DC-MD-VA Nonattainment Area for the
2015 Ozone National Ambient Air Quality Standard

AGENCY: Environmental Protection Agency (EPA).

ACTION: Final rule.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) is approving state
implementation plan (SIP) revisions submitted by the District of
Columbia (DC), State of Maryland (MD), and Commonwealth of Virginia
(VA) (collectively, the States). The revisions consist of the base year
inventory for the Washington, DC-MD-VA nonattainment area (the DC Area)
for the 2015 ozone national ambient air quality standards (NAAQS). This
action is being taken under the Clean Air Act (CAA).

DATES: This final rule is effective May 13, 2022.

ADDRESSES: EPA has established a docket for this action under Docket ID
Number EPA-R03-OAR-2021-0727. All documents in the docket are listed on
the https://www.regulations.gov website. Although listed in the index,
some information is not publicly available, e.g., confidential business
information (CBI) or other information whose disclosure is restricted
by statute. Certain other material, such as copyrighted material, is
not placed on the internet and will be publicly available only in hard
copy form. Publicly available docket materials are available through
https://www.regulations.gov, or please contact the person identified in
the FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT section for additional availability
information.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Michael O'Shea, Planning &
Implementation Branch (3AD30), Air & Radiation Division, U.S.
Environmental Protection Agency, Region III, 1650 Arch Street,
Philadelphia, Pennsylvania 19103. The telephone number is (215) 814-
2064. Dr. O'Shea can also be reached via electronic mail at
[email protected].

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: On October 7, 2020, the Maryland Department
of the Environment (MDE) submitted a revision to the Maryland SIP
entitled, ``SIP-20-04 2017 Base Year Inventory for the Washington, DC-
MD-VA 2015 Ozone NAAQS Nonattainment Area.'' This revision is referred
to as the ``MD submittal'' in this rule. On November 4, 2020, the
District of Columbia Department of Energy and Environment (DOEE),
submitted a revision to the DC SIP entitled, ``DC 2015 Ozone NAAQS
Attainment Plan Base Year Inventory.'' This revision is referred to as
the ``DC submittal'' in this rule. On December 11, 2020, the Virginia
Department of Environmental Quality (VADEQ) submitted a revision to the
Virginia SIP entitled, ``8-Hour Ozone (2015 Standard)--Washington
Attainment Plan ` VA_2017O3BYEI_12112020.' '' This revision is referred
to as the ``VA submittal'' in this rule. The individual state SIP
revisions, referred to collectively in this rule action as the ``DC
Area base year inventory SIPs,'' address the base year inventory
requirement for the DC Area for the 2015 ozone NAAQS.

I. Background

    On February 24, 2022 (87 FR 10318), EPA published a notice of
proposed rulemaking (NPRM) for the States. In the NPRM, EPA proposed
approval of the DC Area base year inventory SIPs. The formal SIP
revisions were submitted by MD on October 7, 2020, DC on November 4,
2020, and VA on December 11, 2020.
    On October 1, 2015, EPA strengthened the 8-hour ozone NAAQS,
lowering the level of the NAAQS from 0.075 ppm parts per million (ppm)
to 0.070 ppm. 80 FR 65292 (October 26, 2015). Effective August 3, 2018,
EPA designated the following jurisdictions in the DC Area as marginal
nonattainment for the 2015 ozone NAAQS: District of Columbia; Calvert,
Charles, Frederick, Montgomery, and Prince George's Counties in MD; and
Arlington, Fairfax, Loudoun, and Prince William Counties and
Alexandria, Fairfax, Falls Church, Manassas, and Manassas Park Cities
in VA. 83 FR 25776 (June 4, 2018). CAA section 182(a)(1) requires ozone
nonattainment areas classified as marginal or above to submit a
comprehensive, accurate, current inventory of actual emissions from all
emissions sources in the nonattainment area, known as a ``base year
inventory.'' The DC Area base year inventory SIPs address a base year
inventory requirement for the DC Area.

II. Summary of SIP Revision and EPA Analysis

A. EPA's Evaluation of the DC Area Base Year Inventory SIPs

    EPA's review of the DC Area base year inventory SIPs indicate that
they meet the base year inventory requirements for the 2015 ozone
NAAQS.
    EPA prepared a technical support document (TSD) for each state's
submittal in support of this rule. In those TSDs, EPA reviewed the
results, procedures, and methodologies for the SIP base year, and found
them to be acceptable and developed in accordance with EPA's technical
guidance. EPA's TSDs for the individual state SIPs are available online
at http://www.regulations.gov, Docket ID No. EPA-R03-OAR-2021-0727.

B. Base Year Inventory Requirements

    In EPA's December 6, 2018 rule, ``Implementation of the 2015
National Ambient Air Quality Standards for Ozone: Nonattainment Area
State Implementation Plan Requirements,'' known as the ``SIP
Requirements Rule,'' EPA set out nonattainment area requirements for
the 2015 ozone NAAQS. (83 FR 62998). The SIP

Requirements Rule established base year inventory requirements, which
were codified at 40 Code of Federal Regulations (CFR) 51.1315. As
required by 40 CFR 51.1315(a), each 2015 ozone nonattainment area must
submit a base year inventory within 2 years of designation.
    Also, 40 CFR 51.1315(a) requires that the inventory year be
selected consistent with the baseline year for the reasonable further
progress (RFP) plan as required by 40 CFR 51.1310(b), which states that
the baseline emissions inventory shall be the emissions inventory for
the most recent calendar year for which a complete triennial inventory
is required to be submitted to EPA under the provisions of subpart A of
40 CFR part 51, Air Emissions Reporting Requirements, 40 CFR 51.1
through 50. The most recent triennial inventory year conducted for the
National Emissions Inventory (NEI) pursuant to the Air Emissions
Reporting Requirements (AERR) rule is 2017. 73 FR 76539 (December 17,
2008). The States selected 2017 as their baseline emissions inventory
year for RFP. This selection comports with EPA's implementation
regulations for the 2015 ozone NAAQS because 2017 is the inventory
year. 40 CFR 51.1310(b).\1\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \1\ On January 29, 2021, the Court of Appeals for the D.C.
Circuit issued its decision regarding multiple challenges to EPA's
implementation rule for the 2015 ozone NAAQS which included, among
other things, upholding this provision allowing states to use an
alternative baseline year for RFP. Sierra Club v. EPA, No. 15-1465
(D.C. Cir.). The other provisions of EPA's ozone implantation rule
at issue in the case are not relevant for this rule.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    Further, 40 CFR 51.1315(c) requires emissions values included in
the base year inventory to be actual ozone season day emissions as
defined by 40 CFR 51.1300(q), which states: Ozone season day emissions
means an average day's emissions for a typical ozone season work
weekday. The state shall select, subject to EPA approval, the
particular month(s) in the ozone season and the day(s) in the work week
to be represented, considering the conditions assumed in the
development of RFP plans and/or emissions budgets for transportation
conformity. The States included actual ozone season day emissions,
pursuant to 40 CFR 51.1315(c).

C. DC Area Base Year Inventory SIPs

    The DC Area base year inventory SIPs, contain an explanation of
each State's 2017 base year emissions inventory for stationary, non-
point, non-road, and on-road anthropogenic sources, as well as biogenic
sources, in the DC Area. The States estimated anthropogenic emissions
for volatile organic compound (VOC), nitrogen oxide (NOx), and carbon
monoxide (CO) for a typical ozone season work weekday. The DC Area base
year inventory SIPs were developed collaboratively. As such, their 2017
base year emissions inventory (BYEI) are almost identical and,
therefore, will be referred to collectively as the ``2017 DC Area
BYEI'' in the remainder of this rule, unless otherwise noted because
individual distinctions are necessary.\2\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \2\ The 2017 DC Area BYEI submitted by each individual state is
found as follows: DC submittal--Appendix BY2017
_EI_Document_October_30_2020_FINAL; MD submittal--Appendix 2. Wash
Region 2015 NAAQS BY Inventory SIP; and VA submittal--Appendix NVA-
INV-SIP-1.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    The States developed the 2017 DC Area BYEI with the following
source categories of anthropogenic emissions sources: Point, quasi-
point, non-point, non-road model, on-road, and commercial marine
vessels, airport, and railroad (MAR) emissions sources, in addition to
biogenic total sources. The 2017 DC Area BYEI sets out the
methodologies the States used to develop their base year inventory for
each source listed. Those methodologies are explained in further depth
within appendices A-D of each state's submission. Data justifying the
inventories are also provided within appendices A-D of each state's
submission. Note, however, that Virginia only included appendix items
relevant to their own state but uploaded files jointly with DC for the
full inventory development. Furthermore, the MD submittal was earliest
and, as such, contains data, development, and guidance that precedes
the widespread adoption of the 2017 NEI. This timing differential
accounts for the differences in the MD submittal as compared to the DC
and VA submittals.
    EPA's review of the DC Area base year inventory SIPs indicates that
they meet the base year inventory requirements for the 2015 ozone
NAAQS. Other specific requirements of MDE's October 7, 2020 submittal,
DOEE's November 4, 2020 submittal and VADEQ's December 11, 2020
submittal and the rationale for EPA's proposed action, including
further information on each source category, are explained in the NPRM
and will not be restated here. No public comments were received on the
NPRM.

III. Final Action

    EPA's review of this material indicates the DC area base year
inventory SIPs meet the base year inventory requirement for the 2015
ozone NAAQS for the DC Area. Therefore, EPA is approving the DC Area
base year inventory SIPs, which were submitted on October 7, 2020 (MD),
November 4, 2020 (DC), and December 11, 2020 (VA).

IV. General Information Pertaining to SIP Submittals From the
Commonwealth of Virginia

    In 1995, Virginia adopted legislation that provides, subject to
certain conditions, for an environmental assessment (audit)
``privilege'' for voluntary compliance evaluations performed by a
regulated entity. The legislation further addresses the relative burden
of proof for parties either asserting the privilege or seeking
disclosure of documents for which the privilege is claimed. Virginia's
legislation also provides, subject to certain conditions, for a penalty
waiver for violations of environmental laws when a regulated entity
discovers such violations pursuant to a voluntary compliance evaluation
and voluntarily discloses such violations to the Commonwealth and takes
prompt and appropriate measures to remedy the violations. Virginia's
Voluntary Environmental Assessment Privilege Law, Va. Code Sec. 10.1-
1198, provides a privilege that protects from disclosure documents and
information about the content of those documents that are the product
of a voluntary environmental assessment. The Privilege Law does not
extend to documents or information that: (1) Are generated or developed
before the commencement of a voluntary environmental assessment; (2)
are prepared independently of the assessment process; (3) demonstrate a
clear, imminent and substantial danger to the public health or
environment; or (4) are required by law.
    On January 12, 1998, the Commonwealth of Virginia Office of the
Attorney General provided a legal opinion that states that the
Privilege law, Va. Code Sec. 10.1-1198, precludes granting a privilege
to documents and information ``required by law,'' including documents
and information ``required by Federal law to maintain program
delegation, authorization or approval,'' since Virginia must ``enforce
Federally authorized environmental programs in a manner that is no less
stringent than their Federal counterparts . . . .'' The opinion
concludes that ``[r]egarding Sec.  10.1-1198, therefore, documents or
other information needed for civil or criminal enforcement under one of
these programs could not be privileged because such documents and
information are essential to pursuing enforcement in a manner required
by Federal law to maintain program delegation, authorization or
approval.''

    Virginia's Immunity law, Va. Code Sec. 10.1-1199, provides that
``[t]o the extent consistent with requirements imposed by Federal
law,'' any person making a voluntary disclosure of information to a
state agency regarding a violation of an environmental statute,
regulation, permit, or administrative order is granted immunity from
administrative or civil penalty. The Attorney General's January 12,
1998 opinion states that the quoted language renders this statute
inapplicable to enforcement of any Federally authorized programs, since
``no immunity could be afforded from administrative, civil, or criminal
penalties because granting such immunity would not be consistent with
Federal law, which is one of the criteria for immunity.''
    Therefore, EPA has determined that Virginia's Privilege and
Immunity statutes will not preclude the Commonwealth from enforcing its
program consistent with the Federal requirements. In any event, because
EPA has also determined that a state audit privilege and immunity law
can affect only state enforcement and cannot have any impact on Federal
enforcement authorities, EPA may at any time invoke its authority under
the CAA, including, for example, sections 113, 167, 205, 211 or 213, to
enforce the requirements or prohibitions of the state plan,
independently of any state enforcement effort. In addition, citizen
enforcement under section 304 of the CAA is likewise unaffected by
this, or any, state audit privilege or immunity law.

V. Statutory and Executive Order Reviews

A. General Requirements

    Under the CAA, the Administrator is required to approve a SIP
submission that complies with the provisions of the CAA and applicable
Federal regulations. 42 U.S.C. 7410(k); 40 CFR 52.02(a). Thus, in
reviewing SIP submissions, EPA's role is to approve state choices,
provided that they meet the criteria of the CAA. Accordingly, this
action merely approves state law as meeting Federal requirements and
does not impose additional requirements beyond those imposed by state
law. For that reason, this action:
     Is not a ``significant regulatory action'' subject to
review by the Office of Management and Budget under Executive Orders
12866 (58 FR 51735, October 4, 1993) and 13563 (76 FR 3821, January 21,
2011);
     Does not impose an information collection burden under the
provisions of the Paperwork Reduction Act (44 U.S.C. 3501 et seq.);
     Is certified as not having a significant economic impact
on a substantial number of small entities under the Regulatory
Flexibility Act (5 U.S.C. 601 et seq.);
     Does not contain any unfunded mandate or significantly or
uniquely affect small governments, as described in the Unfunded
Mandates Reform Act of 1995 (Pub. L. 104-4);
     Does not have Federalism implications as specified in
Executive Order 13132 (64 FR 43255, August 10, 1999);
     Is not an economically significant regulatory action based
on health or safety risks subject to Executive Order 13045 (62 FR
19885, April 23, 1997);
     Is not a significant regulatory action subject to
Executive Order 13211 (66 FR 28355, May 22, 2001);
     Is not subject to requirements of section 12(d) of the
National Technology Transfer and Advancement Act of 1995 (15 U.S.C. 272
note) because application of those requirements would be inconsistent
with the CAA; and
     Does not provide EPA with the discretionary authority to
address, as appropriate, disproportionate human health or environmental
effects, using practicable and legally permissible methods, under
Executive Order 12898 (59 FR 7629, February 16, 1994).
    In addition, this rule does not have tribal implications as
specified by Executive Order 13175 (65 FR 67249, November 9, 2000),
because the SIP is not approved to apply in Indian country located in
the State, and EPA notes that it will not impose substantial direct
costs on tribal governments or preempt tribal law.

B. Submission to Congress and the Comptroller General

    The Congressional Review Act, 5 U.S.C. 801 et seq., as added by the
Small Business Regulatory Enforcement Fairness Act of 1996, generally
provides that before a rule may take effect, the agency promulgating
the rule must submit a rule report, which includes a copy of the rule,
to each House of the Congress and to the Comptroller General of the
United States. EPA will submit a report containing this action and
other required information to the U.S. Senate, the U.S. House of
Representatives, and the Comptroller General of the United States prior
to publication of the rule in the Federal Register. A major rule cannot
take effect until 60 days after it is published in the Federal
Register. This action is not a ``major rule'' as defined by 5 U.S.C.
804(2).

C. Petitions for Judicial Review

    Under section 307(b)(1) of the CAA, petitions for judicial review
of this action must be filed in the United States Court of Appeals for
the appropriate circuit by June 13, 2022. Filing a petition for
reconsideration by the Administrator of this final rule does not affect
the finality of this action for the purposes of judicial review nor
does it extend the time within which a petition for judicial review may
be filed, and shall not postpone the effectiveness of such rule or
action.
    This final rule approving the DC Area base year inventory SIPs may
not be challenged later in proceedings to enforce its requirements.
(See section 307(b)(2).)

List of Subjects in 40 CFR Part 52

    Environmental protection, Air pollution control, Carbon monoxide,
Incorporation by reference, Intergovernmental relations, Reporting and
recordkeeping requirements, Nitrogen dioxide, Volatile organic
compounds.

    Dated: April 6, 2022.
Diana Esher,
Acting Regional Administrator, Region III.

    For the reasons stated in the preamble, the EPA amends 40 CFR part
52 as follows:

PART 52--APPROVAL AND PROMULGATION OF IMPLEMENTATION PLANS

0
1. The authority citation for part 52 continues to read as follows:

    Authority: 42 U.S.C. 7401 et seq.

Subpart J--District of Columbia

0
2. In Sec.  52.470, the table in paragraph (e) is amended by adding an
entry for ``2017 Base Year Emissions Inventories for the Washington,
DC-MD-VA Nonattainment Area for the 2015 Ozone National Ambient Air
Quality Standard'' at the end of the table to read as follows:

Sec.  52.470  Identification of plan.

* * * * *
    (e) * * *

----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
    Name of non-regulatory SIP          Applicable           State                                Additional
             revision                geographic area    submittal date   EPA approval date       explanation
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

                                                  * * * * * * *
2017 Base Year Emissions           The District of           11/4/2020  4/13/2022, [INSERT   Docket 2022-03863.
 Inventories for the Washington,    Columbia portion                     Federal Register
 DC-MD-VA Nonattainment Area for    of the Washington,                   CITATION].
 the 2015 Ozone National Ambient    DC-MD-VA
 Air Quality Standard.              nonattainment area
                                    for the 2015 ozone
                                    NAAQS (i.e., the
                                    District of
                                    Columbia).
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Subpart V--Maryland

0
3. In Sec.  52.1070, the table in paragraph (e) is amended by adding an
entry for ``2017 Base Year Emissions Inventories for the Washington,
DC-MD-VA Nonattainment Area for the 2015 Ozone National Ambient Air
Quality Standard'' at the end of the table to read as follows:

Sec.  52.1070  Identification of plan.

* * * * *
    (e) * * *

----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
    Name of non-regulatory SIP          Applicable           State                                Additional
             revision                geographic area    submittal date   EPA approval date       explanation
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

                                                  * * * * * * *
2017 Base Year Emissions           Maryland portion of       10/7/2020  4/13/2022, [INSERT   The Maryland
 Inventories for the Washington,    the Washington, DC-                  Federal Register     portion consists
 DC-MD-VA Nonattainment Area for    MD-VA                                CITATION].           of Calvert,
 the 2015 Ozone National Ambient    nonattainment area                                        Charles,
 Air Quality Standard.              for the 2015 ozone                                        Frederick,
                                    NAAQS.                                                    Montgomery, and
                                                                                Prince George's
                                                                                counties.
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Subpart VV--Virginia

0
4. In Sec.  52.2420, the table in paragraph (e)(1) is amended by adding
an entry for ``2017 Base Year Emissions Inventories for the Washington,
DC-MD-VA Nonattainment Area for the 2015 Ozone National Ambient Air
Quality Standard'' at the end of the table to read as follows:

Sec.  52.2420  Identification of plan.

* * * * *
    (e) * * *
    (1) * * *

----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
    Name of non-regulatory SIP          Applicable           State                                Additional
             revision                geographic area    submittal date   EPA approval date       explanation
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

                                                  * * * * * * *
2017 Base Year Emissions           The Virginia             12/11/2020  4/13/2022, [insert   The Virginia
 Inventories for the Washington,    portion of the                       Federal Register     portion consists
 DC-MD-VA Nonattainment Area for    Washington, DC-MD-                   citation].           of Arlington,
 the 2015 Ozone National Ambient    VA nonattainment                                          Fairfax, Loudoun,
 Air Quality Standard.              area for the 2015                                         and Prince William
                                    ozone NAAQS (i.e.,                                        counties and
                                    the District of                                           Alexandria,
                                    Columbia).                                                Fairfax, Falls
                                                                                Church, Manassas,
                                                                                and Manassas Park
                                                                                cities.
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

* * * * *

[FR Doc. 2022-07816 Filed 4-12-22; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6560-50-P


[Federal Register Volume 83, Number 236 (Monday, December 10, 2018)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Pages 63402-63403]
[FR Doc No: 2018-26503]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION

Federal Aviation Administration

14 CFR Part 71

[Docket No. FAA-2018-0685; Airspace Docket No. 18-AGL-19]
RIN 2120-AA66

Amendment of Class D Airspace; Detroit, MI

AGENCY: Federal Aviation Administration (FAA), DOT.

ACTION: Final rule.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: This action modifies Class D airspace at Coleman A. Young
Municipal Airport (formerly Detroit City Airport), Detroit, MI, by
changing the airspace designation to Detroit, MI, thereby removing the
old airport name. The name and geographic coordinates of this airport
are also updated to coincide with the FAA's aeronautical database. This
action is necessary to keep information current for the safety and
management of aircraft within the national airspace system.

DATES: Effective 0901 UTC, February 28, 2019. The Director of the
Federal Register approves this incorporation by reference action under
Title 1 Code of Federal Regulations part 51, subject to the annual
revision of FAA Order 7400.11 and publication of conforming amendments.

ADDRESSES: FAA Order 7400.11C, Airspace Designations and Reporting
Points, and subsequent amendments can be viewed online at http://www.faa.gov/air_traffic/publications/. For further information, you can
contact the Airspace Policy Group, Federal Aviation Administration, 800
Independence Avenue SW, Washington, DC 20591; telephone: (202) 267-
8783. The Order is also available for inspection at the National
Archives and Records Administration (NARA). For information on the
availability of FAA Order 7400.11C at NARA, call<PHONE_NUMBER>, or go
to https://www.archives.gov/federal-register/cfr/ibr-locations.html.
    FAA Order 7400.11, Airspace Designations and Reporting Points, is
published yearly and effective on September 15.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Jeffrey Claypool, Federal Aviation
Administration, Operations Support Group, Central Service Center, 10101
Hillwood Parkway, Fort Worth, TX 76177; telephone<PHONE_NUMBER>.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

Authority for This Rulemaking

    The FAA's authority to issue rules regarding aviation safety is
found in Title 49 of the United States Code. Subtitle I, Section 106
describes the authority of the FAA Administrator. Subtitle VII,
Aviation Programs, describes in more detail the scope of the agency's
authority. This rulemaking is promulgated under the authority described
in Subtitle VII, Part A, Subpart I, Section 40103. Under that section,
the FAA is charged with prescribing regulations to assign the use of
airspace necessary to ensure the safety of aircraft and the efficient
use of airspace. This regulation is within the scope of that authority
as it amends Class D airspace at Coleman A. Young Memorial Airport,
Detroit, MI.

History

    The FAA published a notice of proposed rulemaking in the Federal
Register (83 FR 47580; September 20, 2018) for Docket No. FAA-2018-0685
to amend Class D airspace at Coleman A. Young Memorial Airport,
Detroit, MI. Interested parties were invited to participate in this
rulemaking effort by submitting written comments on the proposal to the
FAA. No comments were received.
    Subsequent to publication, the FAA discovered that the longitudinal
geographic coordinate for the airport was published incorrectly. That
error is corrected in this final rule.
    Class D airspace designations are published in paragraph 5000 of
FAA Order 7400.11C, dated August 13, 2018, and effective September 15,
2018, which is incorporated by reference in 14 CFR 71.1. The Class D
airspace designations listed in this document will be published
subsequently in the Order.

Availability and Summary of Documents for Incorporation by Reference

    This document amends FAA Order 7400.11C, Airspace Designations and
Reporting Points, dated August 13, 2018, and effective September 15,
2018. FAA Order 7400.11C is publicly available as listed in the
ADDRESSES section of this document. FAA Order 7400.11C lists Class A,
B, C, D, and E airspace areas, air traffic service routes, and
reporting points.

The Rule

    This amendment to Title 14 Code of Federal Regulations (14 CFR)
part 71 modifies the Class D airspace by updating for the location in
the header of the airspace legal description to Detroit, MI (previously
Detroit City Airport, MI), at Coleman A. Young Municipal Airport
(formerly Detroit City Airport), Detroit, MI, to comply with FAA Order
7400.2L, Procedures for Handling Airspace Matters. The name and
geographic coordinates of the airport are also updated to coincide with
the FAA's aeronautical database.
    The longitudinal geographic coordinate for the airport is corrected
to ``83[deg]00'37'' W'' Except for this change, this rule is the same
as published in the NPRM.

Regulatory Notices and Analyses

    The FAA has determined that this regulation only involves an
established body of technical regulations for which frequent and
routine amendments are necessary to keep them operationally current, is
non-controversial and unlikely to result in adverse or negative
comments. It, therefore: (1) Is not a ``significant regulatory action''
under Executive Order 12866; (2) is not a ``significant rule'' under
DOT Regulatory Policies and Procedures (44 FR 11034; February 26,
1979); and (3) does not warrant preparation of a regulatory evaluation
as the anticipated impact is so minimal. Since this is a routine matter
that only affects air traffic procedures and air navigation, it is
certified that this rule, when promulgated, does not have a significant
economic impact on a substantial number of small entities under the
criteria of the Regulatory Flexibility Act.

Environmental Review

    The FAA has determined that this action qualifies for categorical
exclusion under the National Environmental Policy Act in accordance
with FAA Order 1050.1F, ``Environmental Impacts: Policies and
Procedures,'' paragraph 5-6.5.a. This airspace action is not expected
to cause any potentially significant environmental impacts, and no
extraordinary circumstances exist that warrant preparation of an
environmental assessment.

Lists of Subjects in 14 CFR Part 71

    Airspace, Incorporation by reference, Navigation (air).

Adoption of the Amendment

    In consideration of the foregoing, the Federal Aviation
Administration amends 14 CFR part 71 as follows:

PART 71--DESIGNATION OF CLASS A, B, C, D, AND E AIRSPACE AREAS; AIR
TRAFFIC SERVICE ROUTES; AND REPORTING POINTS

0
1. The authority citation for part 71 continues to read as follows:

    Authority: 49 U.S.C. 106(f), 106(g); 40103, 40113, 40120; E.O.
10854, 24 FR 9565, 3 CFR, 1959-1963 Comp., p. 389.

Sec.  71.1  [Amended]

0
2. The incorporation by reference in 14 CFR 71.1 of FAA Order 7400.11C,
Airspace Designations and Reporting Points, dated August 13, 2018, and
effective September 15, 2018, is amended as follows:

Paragraph 5000 Class D Airspace.

* * * * *

AGL MI D Detroit, MI [Amended]

Coleman A. Young Municipal Airport, MI
    (Lat. 42[deg]24'34'' N, long. 83[deg]00'37'' W)

    That airspace extending upward from the surface to and including
3,100 feet MSL within a 4.1-mile radius of the Coleman A. Young
Municipal Airport.

    Issued in Fort Worth, Texas, on November 26, 2018.
Walter Tweedy,
Acting Manager, Operations Support Group, ATO Central Service Center.
[FR Doc. 2018-26503 Filed 12-7-18; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910-13-P


July 20, 2016

MEMORANDUM

SUBJECT:	Upstream emissions modeling files for HDGHG Phase 2 FRM

FROM:	Jarrod Brown, Chemical Engineer, ASD-OTAQ-EPA

TO:	Greenhouse Gas Emissions Standards and Fuel Efficiency Standards for Medium- and Heavy-Duty Engines and Vehicles - Phase 2 - Docket EPA-HQ-OAR-XXXX-XXXX

Contents:
Upstream emissions modeling for HDGHG Phase 2 includes 6 files:
1. HDGHG2FRM_FC_CY_For_Upstream_030816.xls
2. HDGHG2FRM_FC_MY_For_Upstream_030816.xls
3. PreHDGHG1_FuelCons_MY_Upstream_051915.xls
4. upstream_automator_v11_FRM.py
5. upstream_automator_v11_FRM_CY.py
6. upstream_emissions_rev113015.xlsx

Description:
Files 1-3 contain input volumes for overall gasoline and diesel fuel generated by the MOVES model for various alternatives considered in the FRM. File 1 contains fuel volumes output by calendar year, file 2 contains output by model year and file 3 contains volumes for scenarios considered in the Phase 1 rulemaking for historical comparison.

Files 4-5 contain Python script automating the processing of fuel volume inputs through the upstream emissions calculator. File 4 is used specifically for model year analysis (and should be used in conjunction with file 1 & 3), file 5 is used specifically for calendar year analysis (and should be used in conjunction with file 2).

File 6 contains the upstream emissions calculator used to generate criteria and select toxics emissions for the HDGHG Phase 2 FRM. This calculator analyzes upstream emissions for specific gasoline and diesel volumes (including biofuels) and, by running the scripts contained in files 4-5, is used once for each line of input contained in files 1-3. These results are then aggregated.