[Federal Register Volume 82, Number 142 (Wednesday, July 26, 2017)]
[Notices]
[Page 34736]
[FR Doc No: 2017-15604]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION

Federal Aviation Administration

Thirtieth First RTCA SC-225 Rechargeable Lithium Batteries and
Battery Systems Plenary

AGENCY: Federal Aviation Administration (FAA), U.S. Department of
Transportation (DOT).

ACTION: Thirtieth First RTCA SC-225 Rechargeable Lithium Batteries and
Battery Systems Plenary.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The FAA is issuing this notice to advise the public of a
meeting of Thirtieth First RTCA SC-225 Rechargeable Lithium Batteries
and Battery Systems Plenary.

DATES: The meeting will be held August 31, 2017, 9:00 a.m.-5:00 p.m.

ADDRESSES: The meeting will be held at: Virtual, https://rtca.webex.com/rtca/j.php?MTID=m71004010d843f811903796fa89d6557c, Join
by phone, 1-877-668-4493 Call-in toll-free number (US/Canada), 1-650-
479-3208 Call-in toll number (US/Canada), Access code: 632 109 737,
Meeting Password: ZhqGJQd3.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Karan Hofmann at<EMAIL_ADDRESS>or
202-330-0680, or The RTCA Secretariat, 1150 18th Street NW., Suite 910,
Washington, DC 20036, or by telephone at<PHONE_NUMBER>, fax at (202)
833-9434, or Web site at http://www.rtca.org.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Pursuant to section 10(a) (2) of the Federal
Advisory Committee Act (Pub. L. 92-463, 5 U.S.C., App.), notice is
hereby given for a meeting of the Thirtieth First RTCA SC-225
Rechargeable Lithium Batteries and Battery Systems Plenary. The agenda
will include the following:

August 31, 2017, 9:00 a.m.-5:00 p.m.

(1) Welcome and Administrative Remarks (Including DFO & RTCA Statement)
(2) Introductions
(3) Agenda Review
(4) Meeting-Minutes Review
(5) Final Review and Comment (FRAC) Resolution Review
(6) Approval of DO-311A for Submission to RTCA PMC
(7) Action Item Review
(8) Any Other Business
(9) Adjourn
    Attendance is open to the interested public but limited to space
availability. With the approval of the chairman, members of the public
may present oral statements at the meeting. Persons wishing to present
statements or obtain information should contact the person listed in
the FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT section. Members of the public may
present a written statement to the committee at any time.

    Issued in Washington, DC, on July 20, 2017.
Mohannad Dawoud,
Management & Program Analyst, Partnership Contracts Branch, ANG-A17,
NextGen, Procurement Services Division, Federal Aviation
Administration.
[FR Doc. 2017-15604 Filed 7-25-17; 8:45 am]
 BILLING CODE 4910-13-P


[Federal Register: April 17, 2009 (Volume 74, Number 73)]
[Notices]
[Page 17846]
[DOCID:fr17ap09-51]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission

[Project No. 13257-001]

Modern Hydro; Notice of Intent To File License Application,
Filing of Pre-Application Document, and Approval of Use of the
Traditional Licensing Process

April 9, 2009.
    a. Type of Filing: Notice of Intent to File License Application and
Request to Use the Traditional Licensing Process.
    b. Project No.: 13257-001.
    c. Dated Filed: March 2, 2009.
    d. Submitted By: Modern Hydro.
    e. Name of Project: Lake Delhi Dam Hydroelectric Project.
    f. Location: The project would be located at the Lake Delhi
Recreation Association's Lake Delhi Dam on the Maquoketa River in
Delaware County, Iowa.
    g. Filed Pursuant to: 18 CFR 5.3 of the Commission's regulations.
    h. Applicant Contact: Dwight Shanak, Modern Hydro, N3322 Sunrise
Lane, Waupaca, WI 54981,<PHONE_NUMBER>.
    i. FERC Contact: Dr. Nicholas Palso,<PHONE_NUMBER>4 or
<EMAIL_ADDRESS>    j. Modern Hydro filed its request to use the Traditional Licensing
Process on March 2, 2009. Modern Hydro filed public notice of its
request on March 12, 2009. In a letter dated April 8, 2009, the
Director of the Office of Energy Projects approved Modern Hydro's
request to use the Traditional Licensing Process.
    k. With this notice, we are approving Modern Hydro's request to be
designated as the non-federal representative for section 7 of the
Endangered Species Act and its request to initiate consultation under
section 106 of the National Historic Preservation Act; and recommending
that it begin informal consultation with: (a) The U.S. Fish and
Wildlife Service; and (b) the Iowa State Historic Preservation Officer,
as required by section 106, National Historical Preservation Act, and
the implementing regulations of the Advisory Council on Historic
Preservation at 36 CFR 800.2.
    l. Modern Hydro filed a Pre-Application Document (PAD; including a
proposed process plan and schedule) with the Commission, pursuant to 18
CFR 5.6 of the Commission's regulations.
    m. A copy of the PAD is available for review at the Commission in
the Public Reference Room or may be viewed on the Commission's Web site
(http://www.ferc.gov), using the ``eLibrary'' link. Enter the docket
number, excluding the last three digits in the docket number field to
access the document. For assistance, contact FERC Online Support at
<EMAIL_ADDRESS>or toll free at 1-866-208-3676, of for TTY,
(202) 502-8659. A copy is also available for inspection and
reproduction at the address in paragraph h.
    Register online at http://ferc.gov/docs-filing/esubscription.asp to
be notified via e-mail of new filing and issuances related to this or
other pending projects. For assistance, contact FERC Online Support.

Kimberly D. Bose,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. E9-8803 Filed 4-16-09; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 6717-01-P


[Federal Register Volume 78, Number 9 (Monday, January 14, 2013)]
[Notices]
[Pages 2676-2677]
[FR Doc No: 2013-00474]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES

Food and Drug Administration

[Docket No. FDA-2013-D-0045]

Draft Guidance for Industry on Abuse-Deterrent Opioids--
Evaluation and Labeling; Availability

AGENCY: Food and Drug Administration, HHS.

ACTION: Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Food and Drug Administration (FDA) is announcing the
availability of a draft guidance for industry entitled ``Abuse-
Deterrent Opioids--Evaluation and Labeling.'' The draft guidance
describes how abuse-deterrent properties of opioid analgesic products
should be studied and evaluated, and what claims regarding such
properties may be suitable for inclusion in labeling. In addition to
general input on this draft guidance, FDA is seeking input on the
research topics outlined in the final section of the draft guidance.
FDA also intends to hold a public meeting to solicit additional input
from affected stakeholders on the draft guidance.

DATES: Although you can comment on any guidance at any time (see 21 CFR
10.115(g)(5)), to ensure that the Agency considers your comment on this
draft guidance before it begins work on the final version of the
guidance, submit either electronic or written comments on the draft
guidance by March 15, 2013.

ADDRESSES: Submit written requests for single copies of the draft
guidance to the Division of Drug Information, Center for Drug
Evaluation and Research, Food and Drug Administration, 10903 New
Hampshire Ave., Bldg. 51, rm. 2201, Silver Spring, MD 20993-0002. Send
one self-addressed adhesive label to assist that office in processing
your requests. See the SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION section for electronic
access to the draft guidance document.
    Submit electronic comments on the draft guidance to http://www.regulations.gov. Submit written comments to the Division of Dockets
Management (HFA-305), Food and Drug Administration, 5630 Fishers Lane,
rm. 1061, Rockville, MD 20852.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Matthew Sullivan, Center for Drug
Evaluation and Research (HFD-170), Food and Drug Administration, 10903
New Hampshire Ave., Bldg. 22, rm. 3160, Silver Spring, MD 20993, 301-
796-1245<EMAIL_ADDRESS>
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

I. Background

    FDA is announcing the availability of a draft guidance for industry
entitled ``Abuse-Deterrent Opioids--Evaluation and Labeling.''
Prescription opioid analgesics are an important component of modern
pain management, but abuse and misuse of these products remains a
serious and growing public health problem. One important effort in
reducing abuse and misuse is the development of opioid analgesics
specially formulated to deter abuse. FDA considers development of
abuse-deterrent opioid analgesics to be a public health priority and is
encouraging their development.
    This draft guidance is intended to provide industry with a
framework for evaluating and labeling abuse-deterrent opioid products.
The draft guidance discusses how the potentially abuse-deterrent
properties of an opioid analgesic formulated to deter abuse should be
studied, specifically addressing in vitro studies, pharmacokinetic
studies, human abuse potential studies, and postmarket studies. The
draft guidance also describes the types of information and claims that
may be suitable for inclusion in labeling.
    Providing a clear framework for the evaluation and labeling of the
abuse-deterrent properties of opioid analgesics intended to deter abuse
should help to incentivize the development of safer, less abusable
opioid analgesics, and should also facilitate the dissemination of fair
and accurate information regarding such products. FDA also expects that
the publication of this draft guidance will stimulate a productive
discussion among FDA, industry, and other stakeholders concerning the
appropriate development, evaluation, and labeling of these products. In
the final section of the draft guidance, FDA also lists several areas
where additional scientific research and analysis would be especially
helpful.
    This draft guidance is being issued consistent with FDA's good
guidance practices regulation (21 CFR 10.115). FDA also intends to hold
a public meeting to solicit additional input from affected stakeholders
on the draft guidance. The guidance, when finalized, will represent the
Agency's current thinking on evaluation and labeling of abuse-deterrent
opioids. It does not create or confer any rights for or on any person
and does not operate to bind FDA or the public. An alternative approach
may be used if such approach satisfies the requirements of the
applicable statutes and regulations.

II. Comments

    Interested persons may submit either electronic comments regarding
this document to http://www.regulations.gov or written comments to the
Division of Dockets Management (see ADDRESSES). It is only necessary to
send one set of comments. Identify comments with the docket number
found in brackets in the heading of this document. Received comments
may be seen in the Division of Dockets Management between 9 a.m. and 4
p.m., Monday through Friday, and will be posted to the docket at http://www.regulations.gov.

III. Electronic Access

    Persons with access to the Internet may obtain the document at
either http://www.fda.gov/Drugs/GuidanceComplianceRegulatoryInformation/Guidances/default.htm or http://www.regulations.gov.

    Dated: January 8, 2013.
Leslie Kux,
Assistant Commissioner for Policy.
[FR Doc. 2013-00474 Filed 1-11-13; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4160-01-P


[Federal Register Volume 76, Number 55 (Tuesday, March 22, 2011)]
[Proposed Rules]
[Pages 15872-15874]
[FR Doc No: 2011-6644]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION

Federal Aviation Administration

14 CFR Part 39

[Docket No. FAA-2011-0225; Directorate Identifier 2010-NM-211-AD]
RIN 2120-AA64

Airworthiness Directives; Airbus Model A330-200 and -300 Series
Airplanes

AGENCY: Federal Aviation Administration (FAA), DOT.

ACTION: Notice of proposed rulemaking (NPRM).

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: We propose to adopt a new airworthiness directive (AD) for the
products listed above. This proposed AD results from mandatory
continuing airworthiness information (MCAI) originated by an aviation
authority of another country to identify and correct an unsafe
condition on an aviation product. The MCAI describes the unsafe
condition as:
* * * * *
    The airworthiness limitations applicable to the Safe Life
Airworthiness Limitation Items (SL ALI) are given in Airbus A330 ALS
Part 1 and A340 ALS Part 1, which are approved by the European
Aviation Safety Agency (EASA).
    The revision 05 of Airbus A340 ALS Part 1 introduces more
restrictive maintenance requirements and/or airworthiness
limitations. Failure to comply with this revision constitutes an
unsafe condition.
    For A330 aeroplanes, this EASA AD retains the requirements of
EASA AD 2010-0131, which it supersedes.
    For A340 aeroplanes, this EASA AD supersedes EASA AD 2009-0192,
and requires the implementation of the new or more restrictive
maintenance requirements and/or airworthiness limitations as
specified in Airbus A340 ALS Part 1, revision 05.

The unsafe condition is fatigue cracking, damage, and corrosion in
certain structure, which could result in reduced structural integrity
of the airplane. The proposed AD would require actions that are
intended to address the unsafe condition described in the MCAI.

DATES: We must receive comments on this proposed AD by May 6, 2011.

ADDRESSES: You may send comments by any of the following methods:
     Federal eRulemaking Portal: Go to http://www.regulations.gov. Follow the instructions for submitting comments.
     Fax:<PHONE_NUMBER>.
     Mail: U.S. Department of Transportation, Docket
Operations, M-30, West Building Ground Floor, Room W12-140, 1200 New
Jersey Avenue, SE., Washington, DC 20590.
     Hand Delivery: U.S. Department of Transportation, Docket
Operations, M-30, West Building Ground Floor, Room W12-40, 1200 New
Jersey Avenue, SE., Washington, DC, between 9 a.m. and 5 p.m., Monday
through Friday, except Federal holidays.
    For service information identified in this proposed AD, contact
Airbus SAS--Airworthiness Office--EAL, 1 Rond Point Maurice Bellonte,
31707 Blagnac Cedex, France; telephone +33 5 61 93 36 96; fax +33 5 61
93 45 80, e-mail<EMAIL_ADDRESS>Internet http://www.airbus.com. You may review copies of the referenced service
information at the FAA, Transport Airplane Directorate, 1601 Lind
Avenue, SW., Renton, Washington. For information on the availability of
this material at the FAA, call<PHONE_NUMBER>.

Examining the AD Docket

    You may examine the AD docket on the Internet at http://www.regulations.gov; or in person at the Docket Operations office
between 9 a.m. and 5 p.m., Monday through Friday, except Federal
holidays. The AD docket contains this proposed AD, the regulatory
evaluation, any comments received, and other information. The street
address for the Docket Operations office (telephone<PHONE_NUMBER>) is
in the ADDRESSES section. Comments will be available in the AD docket
shortly after receipt.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Vladimir Ulyanov, Aerospace Engineer,
International Branch, ANM-116, Transport Airplane Directorate, FAA,
1601 Lind Avenue, SW., Renton, Washington 98057-3356; telephone (425)
227-1138; fax<PHONE_NUMBER>.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

Comments Invited

    We invite you to send any written relevant data, views, or
arguments about this proposed AD. Send your comments to an address
listed under the ADDRESSES section. Include ``Docket No. FAA-2011-0225;
Directorate Identifier 2010-NM-211-AD'' at the beginning of your
comments. We specifically invite comments on the overall regulatory,
economic, environmental, and energy aspects of this proposed AD. We
will consider all comments received by the closing date and may amend
this proposed AD based on those comments.
    We will post all comments we receive, without change, to http://www.regulations.gov, including any personal information you provide. We
will also post a report summarizing each substantive verbal contact we
receive about this proposed AD.

Discussion

    The European Aviation Safety Agency (EASA), which is the Technical
Agent for the Member States of the European Community, has issued EASA
Airworthiness Directive 2010-0253, dated December 3, 2010 (referred to
after this as ``the MCAI''), to correct an unsafe condition for the
specified products. The MCAI states:

    The airworthiness limitations are currently distributed in the
Airbus A330 Airworthiness Limitations Section (ALS) and A340 ALS.
    The airworthiness limitations applicable to the Safe Life
Airworthiness Limitation Items (SL ALI) are given in Airbus A330 ALS
Part 1 and A340 ALS Part 1, which are approved by the European
Aviation Safety Agency (EASA).
    The revision 05 of Airbus A340 ALS Part 1 introduces more
restrictive maintenance requirements and/or airworthiness
limitations. Failure to comply with this revision constitutes an
unsafe condition.
    For A330 aeroplanes, this EASA AD retains the requirements of
EASA AD 2010-0131, which it supersedes.
    For A340 aeroplanes, this EASA AD supersedes EASA AD 2009-0192,
and requires the implementation of the new or more restrictive
maintenance requirements and/or airworthiness limitations as
specified in Airbus A340 ALS Part 1, revision 05.

The unsafe condition is fatigue cracking, damage, and corrosion in
certain structure, which could result in reduced structural integrity
of the airplane. You

may obtain further information by examining the MCAI in the AD docket.

Relevant Service Information

    Airbus has issued A330 ALS Part 1, ``Safe Life Airworthiness
Limitation Items,'' Revision 05, dated July 29, 2010. The actions
described in this service information are intended to correct the
unsafe condition identified in the MCAI.

Related Rulemaking

    On April 20, 2006, we issued AD 2006-09-07, Amendment 39-14577 (71
FR 25919, May 3, 2006), that applies to Airbus Model A330-200 and -300
series airplanes and Model A340-200, -300, -500, and -600 series
airplanes. That AD requires revising the airworthiness limitations
section of the instructions for continued airworthiness to incorporate
new information. This NPRM would include the requirements of paragraph
(f)(2) of AD 2006-09-07 for Model A330 airplanes.
    Additionally, on February 3, 2011, we issued AD 2011-04-06,
Amendment 39-16606 (76 FR 8610, February 15, 2011), for Airbus Model
A340-200, -300, -500, and -600 series airplanes, to require revising
the maintenance program. Doing this revision terminates the
requirements of AD 2006-09-07 for Model A340 airplanes.
    We are also considering issuance of another NPRM related to this
NPRM. The NPRM we are considering, Directorate Identifier 2010-NM-210-
AD, would supersede AD 2006-09-07 and would restate the requirements of
paragraph (f)(1) of AD 2006-09-07.

FAA's Determination and Requirements of This Proposed AD

    This product has been approved by the aviation authority of another
country, and is approved for operation in the United States. Pursuant
to our bilateral agreement with the State of Design Authority, we have
been notified of the unsafe condition described in the MCAI and service
information referenced above. We are proposing this AD because we
evaluated all pertinent information and determined an unsafe condition
exists and is likely to exist or develop on other products of the same
type design.

Differences Between This AD and the MCAI or Service Information

    We have reviewed the MCAI and related service information and, in
general, agree with their substance. But we might have found it
necessary to use different words from those in the MCAI to ensure the
AD is clear for U.S. operators and is enforceable. In making these
changes, we do not intend to differ substantively from the information
provided in the MCAI and related service information.
    We might also have proposed different actions in this AD from those
in the MCAI in order to follow FAA policies. Any such differences are
highlighted in a NOTE within the proposed AD.

Costs of Compliance

    Based on the service information, we estimate that this proposed AD
would affect about 55 products of U.S. registry.
    The actions that are required by AD 2006-09-07, take about 1 work-
hour per product, at an average labor rate of $85 per work hour. Based
on these figures, the estimated cost of the currently required actions
is $85 per product.
    We estimate that it would take about 1 work-hour per product to
comply with the requirements of this proposed AD. The average labor
rate is $85 per work-hour. Based on these figures, we estimate the cost
of the proposed AD on U.S. operators to be $4,675, or $85 per product.

Authority for This Rulemaking

    Title 49 of the United States Code specifies the FAA's authority to
issue rules on aviation safety. Subtitle I, section 106, describes the
authority of the FAA Administrator. ``Subtitle VII: Aviation
Programs,'' describes in more detail the scope of the Agency's
authority.
    We are issuing this rulemaking under the authority described in
``Subtitle VII, Part A, Subpart III, Section 44701: General
requirements.'' Under that section, Congress charges the FAA with
promoting safe flight of civil aircraft in air commerce by prescribing
regulations for practices, methods, and procedures the Administrator
finds necessary for safety in air commerce. This regulation is within
the scope of that authority because it addresses an unsafe condition
that is likely to exist or develop on products identified in this
rulemaking action.

Regulatory Findings

    We determined that this proposed AD would not have federalism
implications under Executive Order 13132. This proposed AD would not
have a substantial direct effect on the States, on the relationship
between the national Government and the States, or on the distribution
of power and responsibilities among the various levels of government.
    For the reasons discussed above, I certify this proposed
regulation:
    1. Is not a ``significant regulatory action'' under Executive Order
12866;
    2. Is not a ``significant rule'' under the DOT Regulatory Policies
and Procedures (44 FR 11034, February 26, 1979); and
    3. Will not have a significant economic impact, positive or
negative, on a substantial number of small entities under the criteria
of the Regulatory Flexibility Act.
    We prepared a regulatory evaluation of the estimated costs to
comply with this proposed AD and placed it in the AD docket.

List of Subjects in 14 CFR Part 39

    Air transportation, Aircraft, Aviation safety, Incorporation by
reference, Safety.

The Proposed Amendment

    Accordingly, under the authority delegated to me by the
Administrator, the FAA proposes to amend 14 CFR part 39 as follows:

PART 39--AIRWORTHINESS DIRECTIVES

    1. The authority citation for part 39 continues to read as follows:

    Authority: 49 U.S.C. 106(g), 40113, 44701.

Sec.  39.13  [Amended]

    2. The FAA amends Sec.  39.13 by adding the following new AD:

Airbus: Docket No. FAA-2011-0225; Directorate Identifier 2010-NM-
211-AD.

Comments Due Date

    (a) We must receive comments by May 6, 2011.

Affected ADs

    (b) AD 2006-09-07, Amendment 39-14577, is affected by this AD.
The requirements of paragraph (f)(2) of AD 2006-09-07 for Airbus
Model A330 airplanes are restated in this AD.

Applicability

    (c) This AD applies to Airbus Model A330-201, -202, -203, -223,
-223F, -243, and -243F airplanes, and Model A330-301, -302, -303, -
321, -322, -323, -341, -342, and -343 airplanes, certificated in any
category, all manufacturer serial numbers.

    Note 1: This AD requires revisions to certain operator
maintenance documents to include new inspections. Compliance with
these inspections is required by 14 CFR 91.403(c). For airplanes
that have been previously modified, altered, or repaired in the
areas addressed by these inspections, the operator may not be able
to accomplish the inspections described in the revisions. In this
situation, to comply with 14 CFR 91.403(c), the operator must
request approval for an alternative method of compliance according
to paragraph (j)(1) of this AD. The request should include a
description of changes to the required inspections that will ensure
the continued operational safety of the airplane.

Subject

    (d) Air Transport Association (ATA) of America Code 05.

Reason

    (e) The mandatory continuing airworthiness information (MCAI)
states:
* * * * *
    The airworthiness limitations applicable to the Safe Life
Airworthiness Limitation Items (SL ALI) are given in Airbus A330 ALS
Part 1 and A340 ALS Part 1, which are approved by the European
Aviation Safety Agency (EASA).
    The revision 05 of Airbus A340 ALS Part 1 introduces more
restrictive maintenance requirements and/or airworthiness
limitations. Failure to comply with this revision constitutes an
unsafe condition.
    For A330 aeroplanes, this EASA AD retains the requirements of
EASA AD 2010-0131, which it supersedes.
    For A340 aeroplanes, this EASA AD supersedes EASA AD 2009-0192,
and requires the implementation of the new or more restrictive
maintenance requirements and/or airworthiness limitations as
specified in Airbus A340 ALS Part 1, revision 05.

The unsafe condition is fatigue cracking, damage, and corrosion in
certain structure, which could result in reduced structural
integrity of the airplane.

Compliance

    (f) You are responsible for having the actions required by this
AD performed within the compliance times specified, unless the
actions have already been done.

Restatement of Requirements of Paragraph (f)(2) of AD 2006-09-07

Airworthiness Limitations Revision

    (g) For Model A330-201, -202, -203, -223, -243, -301, -302, -
303, -321, -322, -323, -341, -342, and -343 airplanes: Within 3
months after June 7, 2006 (the effective date of AD 2006-09-07),
revise the ALS of the Instructions for Continued Airworthiness by
incorporating Section 9-1 ``Life limits monitored parts'' Revision
05, dated April 7, 2005, of the Airbus A330 Maintenance Planning
Document, into the ALS.

New Requirements of This AD

Revise the Maintenance Program

    (h) Within 3 months after the effective date of this AD: Revise
the maintenance program by incorporating Airbus A330 ALS Part 1,
``Safe Life Airworthiness Limitation Items,'' Revision 05, dated
July 29, 2010. Comply with all Airbus Safe Life ALS Part 1, ``A330
Airworthiness Limitation Items,'' Revision 05, dated July 29, 2010,
at the times specified therein. Accomplishing the revision in this
paragraph ends the requirements in paragraph (g) of this AD.

Alternative Intervals or Limits

    (i) Except as provided by paragraph (j)(1) of this AD, after
accomplishing the actions specified in paragraph (h) of this AD, no
alternatives to the maintenance tasks, intervals, or limitations
specified in paragraph (h) of this AD may be used.

FAA AD Differences

    Note 2: This AD differs from the MCAI and/or service information
as follows:
    (1) Although the applicability in the MCAI also identifies
Airbus Model A340-200 -300, -500, and -600 series airplanes; this AD
only applies to Airbus Model A330-200 and -300 series airplanes. FAA
AD 2011-04-06 addresses Model A340-200, -300, -500, and -600 series
airplanes.
    (2) The applicability in the MCAI does not specify Model A330-
223F and -243F airplanes. Those models are listed in the
applicability of this AD.
    (3) The MCAI requires incorporating Airbus A330 ALS Part 1,
``Safe Life Airworthiness Limitation Items,'' Revision 04, dated
January 28, 2010; however, this AD requires incorporating Airbus
A330 ALS Part 1, ``Safe Life Airworthiness Limitation Items,''
Revision 05, dated July 29, 2010, which adds the airworthiness
limitation items for Model A330-223F and -243F airplanes.

Other FAA AD Provisions

    (j) The following provisions also apply to this AD:
    (1) Alternative Methods of Compliance (AMOCs): The Manager,
International Branch, ANM-116, FAA, has the authority to approve
AMOCs for this AD, if requested using the procedures found in 14 CFR
39.19. In accordance with 14 CFR 39.19, send your request to your
principal inspector or local Flight Standards District Office, as
appropriate. If sending information directly to the International
Branch, send it to ATTN: Vladimir Ulyanov, Aerospace Engineer,
International Branch, ANM-116, Transport Airplane Directorate, FAA,
1601 Lind Avenue, SW., Renton, Washington 98057-3356; telephone
(425) 227-1138; fax<PHONE_NUMBER>. Information may be e-mailed to:
<EMAIL_ADDRESS>Before using any approved AMOC,
notify your appropriate principal inspector, or lacking a principal
inspector, the manager of the local flight standards district
office/certificate holding district office. The AMOC approval letter
must specifically reference this AD.
    (2) Airworthy Product: For any requirement in this AD to obtain
corrective actions from a manufacturer or other source, use these
actions if they are FAA-approved. Corrective actions are considered
FAA-approved if they are approved by the State of Design Authority
(or their delegated agent). You are required to assure the product
is airworthy before it is returned to service.

Related Information

    (k) Refer to MCAI EASA Airworthiness Directive 2010-0253, dated
December 3, 2010; and Airbus A330 ALS Part 1, ``Safe Life
Airworthiness Limitation Items,'' Revision 05, dated July 29, 2010;
for related information.

    Issued in Renton, Washington, on March 14, 2011.
Ali Bahrami,
Manager, Transport Airplane Directorate, Aircraft Certification
Service.
[FR Doc. 2011-6644 Filed 3-21-11; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910-13-P


[Federal Register Volume 78, Number 242 (Tuesday, December 17, 2013)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Pages 76209-76212]
[FR Doc No: 2013-29803]

=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY

40 CFR Part 52

[EPA-R03-OAR-2010-0141; FRL-9904-14-Region-3]

Approval and Promulgation of Air Quality Implementation Plans;
Delaware; Attainment Plan for the Philadelphia-Wilmington,
Pennsylvania-New Jersey-Delaware Nonattainment Area for the 1997 Annual
Fine Particulate Matter Standard

AGENCY: Environmental Protection Agency (EPA).

ACTION: Final rule.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: EPA is approving a State Implementation Plan (SIP) revision
submitted by the State of Delaware. The SIP revision (also referred to
herein as ``the attainment plan'') demonstrates Delaware's attainment
of the 1997 annual fine particulate matter (PM2.5) national
ambient air quality standard (NAAQS) (the 1997 PM2.5 NAAQS)
for the Philadelphia-Wilmington, Pennsylvania-New Jersey-Delaware (PA-
NJ-DE) nonattainment area (Philadelphia Area). The SIP revision
includes Delaware's attainment demonstration for the Philadelphia Area
and motor vehicle emission budgets (MVEBs) used for transportation
conformity purposes for New Castle County, Delaware. The attainment
plan also includes an analysis of reasonably available control measures
(RACM) and reasonably available control technology (RACT), a base year
emissions inventory, and contingency measures. This action is being
taken in accordance with the Clean Air Act (CAA).

DATES: This final rule is effective on January 16, 2014.

ADDRESSES: EPA has established a docket for this action under Docket ID
Number EPA-R03-OAR-2010-0141. All documents in the docket are listed in
the www.regulations.gov Web site. Although listed in the electronic
docket, some information is not publicly available, i.e., confidential
business information (CBI) or other information whose disclosure is
restricted by statute. Certain other material, such as copyrighted
material, is not placed on the Internet and will be publicly available
only in hard copy form. Publicly available docket materials are
available either electronically through www.regulations.gov or in hard
copy for public inspection during normal business hours at the Air
Protection Division, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Region III,
1650 Arch Street, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania 19103. Copies of the State
submittal are available at the Delaware Department of Natural Resources
and Environmental Control, 89 Kings Highway, P.O. Box 1401, Dover,
Delaware 19903.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Rose Quinto,<PHONE_NUMBER>, or by
email at<EMAIL_ADDRESS>
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

I. Background

    By letter dated April 3, 2008, Delaware submitted the SIP revision
at issue to EPA. By letter dated April 25, 2012, Delaware submitted
revisions to the portion of the SIP revision relating to the MVEBs. The
April 25, 2012 MVEBs revised submittal replaced the previously
submitted 2009 MVEBs with a budget that is based on the Motor Vehicle
Emissions Simulator (MOVES) model and included MVEBs for 2012. On
November 19, 2012 (77 FR 69399), EPA published a notice of proposed
rulemaking seeking comment on EPA's proposed approval of this SIP
revision, including the portion relating to the 2009 and 2012 MVEBs for
transportation conformity purposes for New Castle County, Delaware
(hereinafter referred to as ``the NPR''). In response to the NPR, EPA
received a single comment dated November 30, 2012. A summary of the
November 30, 2012 comment and EPA's response is provided in Section III
(Summary of Public Comment and EPA Response) of this final rulemaking
action.
    On March 4, 2013, EPA took final rulemaking action on the portion
of the attainment plan relating to the base year emissions inventory.
See 78 FR 10420. As a result of this March 2013 final rulemaking
action, no further action needs to be taken on such portion of the
April 3, 2008 SIP revision. Therefore, this final rulemaking action
relates to the remaining portions of the attainment plan, including:
(1) An attainment demonstration for the Delaware portion of the
Philadelphia Area; (2) 2009 and 2012 MVEBs used for transportation
conformity purposes for New Castle County, Delaware; (3) an analysis of
RACM and RACT; and, (4) contingency measures.
    On September 19, 2013 (78 FR 57473), EPA published a supplemental
NPR that revised and expanded the basis for proposing approval of
Delaware's attainment plan for the 1997 annual PM2.5 NAAQS
in light of the developments since EPA issued its initial proposal on
November 19, 2012 (hereinafter referred to as ``the supplemental
NPR''). Principally, the supplemental NPR addressed the potential
effects of a January 4, 2013 decision of the United States Court of
Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit (D.C. Circuit Court)
remanding to EPA two final rules implementing the 1997 PM2.5
NAAQS. In the supplemental NPR, EPA also revised its proposed approval
of Delaware's

attainment plan for the 1997 PM2.5 NAAQS to clarify that EPA
was not relying upon certain regulations which were part of the
attainment plan, because such regulations were not necessary to
demonstrate attainment of the 1997 PM2.5 NAAQS. As part of
this supplemental NPR, EPA also proposed to approve the 2009 and 2012
MVEBs used for transportation conformity purposes for New Castle
County, Delaware. EPA did not receive any comments on the September 19,
2013 supplemental NPR.

II. Summary of SIP Revision

    The portions of the SIP revision that are subject to this action
demonstrate Delaware's attainment of the 1997 PM2.5 NAAQS
and includes: (1) Delaware's attainment demonstration for the Delaware
portion of the Philadelphia Area and (2) the 2009 and 2012 MVEBs used
for transportation conformity purposes for New Castle County, Delaware.
The remaining portion of the attainment plan also includes an analysis
of RACM/RACT and contingency measures. The attainment plan does not
include a Reasonable Further Progress (RFP) plan; however, for reasons
explained in the November 19, 2012 NPR and the supplemental NPR, EPA
proposed to make a determination that an RFP plan is not required,
because Delaware demonstrated that attainment with the 1997
PM2.5 NAAQS occurred in the Delaware portion of the
Philadelphia Area by the attainment date of April 2010. The rationale
for EPA's proposed action is explained in the NPR and the supplemental
NPR and will not be restated here.

III. Summary of Public Comment and EPA Response

    Comment: The commenter endorsed EPA's proposed approval and stated
that EPA should approve Delaware's attainment plan and the MVEBs
included in the attainment plan. The commenter stated his belief that
the reduction of PM2.5, sulfur dioxide (SO2) and
nitrogen oxides (NOX) emissions in Delaware's attainment
plan will allow the Area to reach an overall particulate attainment
level. Further, the commenter supported approval of the MVEBs because
the MVEBs are consistent with Delaware's plan for attaining the 1997
PM2.5 NAAQS. However, the commenter expressed some concerns
about Delaware's approach to attaining the 1997 PM2.5 NAAQS
without regulating ammonia (NH3) and volatile organic
compounds (VOCs). While the commenter noted that Delaware has achieved
attainment of the 1997 PM2.5 NAAQS, the commenter also
included a broad statement that New Castle County has not achieved
attainment with unspecified ``air quality standards prescribed by EPA's
regulations.''
    Response: EPA thanks the commenter for endorsing the approval of
the Delaware attainment plan and the MVEBs included in the attainment
plan and appreciates that the comments submitted also fulfilled an
academic writing assignment. EPA agrees with the commenter's conclusion
that the attainment plan submitted by Delaware adequately addresses
emissions of PM2.5 and the PM2.5 precursors
SO2 and NOX in order to provide for attainment of
the 1997 PM2.5 NAAQS. Moreover, EPA notes that the Agency
has specifically reexamined the issue of whether the attainment plan
addresses the correct PM2.5 precursors in the supplemental
NPR. As indicated in the supplemental NPR, EPA has concluded that
regulation of emissions of VOC and NH3 from sources in
Delaware was not necessary in order to provide for attainment of the
1997 PM2.5 NAAQS in the Philadelphia Area.
    As to the commenter's divergent opinions that: (1) Delaware has
achieved attainment with the NAAQS at issue and (2) New Castle County
has not achieved attainment with some unspecified EPA air quality
regulations, it is important to note that the SIP revision at issue
pertains to the Delaware's attainment plan for the 1997 annual
PM2.5 NAAQS. The record presented clearly supports EPA's
approval of this attainment plan for this purpose. Additionally, EPA
refers the commenter to EPA's May 16, 2012 determination that the
Philadelphia Area attained the 1997 annual PM2.5 NAAQS by
the applicable date, April 5, 2010, and EPA's issuance of a clean data
determination for the Philadelphia Area. See 77 FR 28782. The
administrative record for today's final rulemaking action, in
conjunction with EPA's May 16, 2012 final rulemaking action, clearly
supports the finding that Delaware has achieved the NAAQS at issue. Due
to a lack of specificity on the commenter's part, EPA is unable to
further respond to the commenter's concerns relating to New Castle
County's attainment with unspecified EPA air quality regulations.

IV. Final Action

    As the base year emissions inventory portion of the SIP revision
was previously approved through a separate action (see 78 FR 10420),
EPA is approving the remaining portions of the SIP revision, which was
submitted by the State of Delaware on April 3, 2008, and amended on
April 25, 2012, and includes: (1) The attainment plan for the 1997
PM2.5 NAAQS for the Delaware portion of the Philadelphia
Area and (2) the 2009 and 2012 MVEBs for transportation conformity
purposes for New Castle County, Delaware. The portions of the
attainment plan which are subject to this final rulemaking action
include Delaware's attainment demonstration, an analysis of RACM/RACT
and contingency measures. Through this rulemaking action, EPA is making
a final determination that Delaware's attainment plan meets the
applicable requirements of the CAA. For reasons explained in the
supplemental NPR, EPA revised its original proposed approval of the
attainment plan to propose approval of Delaware's 1997 PM2.5
attainment plan as meeting the requirements for attainment plans for
the 1997 PM2.5 NAAQS, without reliance on the following
measures identified in the attainment plan: (1) Regulation 1142 Section
2.0 for NOX emissions at petroleum refineries; (2) certain
control measures for VOC emissions; and, (3) the Clean Air Interstate
Rule (CAIR). As discussed in the supplemental NPR, these measures are
not necessary for the purposes of meeting the requirements for RACM,
RACT, section 189(e) or the attainment demonstration.

V. Statutory and Executive Order Reviews

A. General Requirements

    Under the CAA, the Administrator is required to approve a SIP
submission that complies with the provisions of the CAA and applicable
Federal regulations. 42 U.S.C. 7410(k); 40 CFR 52.02(a). Thus, in
reviewing SIP submissions, EPA's role is to approve state choices,
provided that they meet the criteria of the CAA. Accordingly, this
action merely approves state law as meeting Federal requirements and
does not impose additional requirements beyond those imposed by state
law. For that reason, this action:
     Is not a ``significant regulatory action'' subject to
review by the Office of Management and Budget under Executive Order
12866 (58 FR 51735, October 4, 1993);
     does not impose an information collection burden under the
provisions of the Paperwork Reduction Act (44 U.S.C. 3501 et seq.);
     is certified as not having a significant economic impact
on a substantial number of small entities under the Regulatory
Flexibility Act (5 U.S.C. 601 et seq.);

     does not contain any unfunded mandate or significantly or
uniquely affect small governments, as described in the Unfunded
Mandates Reform Act of 1995 (Pub. L. 104-4);
     does not have Federalism implications as specified in
Executive Order 13132 (64 FR 43255, August 10, 1999);
     is not an economically significant regulatory action based
on health or safety risks subject to Executive Order 13045 (62 FR
19885, April 23, 1997);
     is not a significant regulatory action subject to
Executive Order 13211 (66 FR 28355, May 22, 2001);
     is not subject to requirements of Section 12(d) of the
National Technology Transfer and Advancement Act of 1995 (15 U.S.C. 272
note) because application of those requirements would be inconsistent
with the CAA; and
     does not provide EPA with the discretionary authority to
address, as appropriate, disproportionate human health or environmental
effects, using practicable and legally permissible methods, under
Executive Order 12898 (59 FR 7629, February 16, 1994).
In addition, this rule does not have tribal implications as specified
by Executive Order 13175 (65 FR 67249, November 9, 2000), because the
SIP is not approved to apply in Indian country located in the state,
and EPA notes that it will not impose substantial direct costs on
tribal governments or preempt tribal law.

B. Submission to Congress and the Comptroller General

    The Congressional Review Act, 5 U.S.C. 801 et seq., as added by the
Small Business Regulatory Enforcement Fairness Act of 1996, generally
provides that before a rule may take effect, the agency promulgating
the rule must submit a rule report, which includes a copy of the rule,
to each House of the Congress and to the Comptroller General of the
United States. EPA will submit a report containing this action and
other required information to the U.S. Senate, the U.S. House of
Representatives, and the Comptroller General of the United States prior
to publication of the rule in the Federal Register. A major rule cannot
take effect until 60 days after it is published in the Federal
Register. This action is not a ``major rule'' as defined by 5 U.S.C.
804(2).

C. Petitions for Judicial Review

    Under section 307(b)(1) of the CAA, petitions for judicial review
of this action must be filed in the United States Court of Appeals for
the appropriate circuit by February 18, 2014. Filing a petition for
reconsideration by the Administrator of this final rule does not affect
the finality of this action for the purposes of judicial review nor
does it extend the time within which a petition for judicial review may
be filed, and shall not postpone the effectiveness of such rule or
action. This action approving Delaware's SIP revision which
demonstrates attainment of the 1997 annual PM2.5 NAAQS for
the Philadelphia Area may not be challenged later in proceedings to
enforce its requirements. (See section 307(b)(2).)

List of Subjects in 40 CFR Part 52

    Environmental protection, Air pollution control, Incorporation by
reference, Nitrogen dioxide, Particulate matter, Reporting and
recordkeeping requirements, Sulfur oxides, Volatile organic compounds.

    Dated: November 29, 2013.
W.C. Early,
Acting Regional Administrator, Region III.

    40 CFR part 52 is amended as follows:

PART 52--APPROVAL AND PROMULGATION OF IMPLEMENTATION PLANS

0
1. The authority citation for part 52 continues to read as follows:

    Authority: 42 U.S.C. 7401 et seq.

Subpart I-- Delaware

0
2. In Sec.  52.420, the table in paragraph (e) is amended by adding the
entry for the 1997 Annual PM2.5 Attainment Plan for Delaware
and the Motor Vehicle Emissions Budget for 2009 and 2012 at the end of
the table to read as follows:

Sec.  52.420  Identification of plan.

* * * * *
    (e) * * *

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
                                                                  State
 Name of non-regulatory SIP revision   Applicable geographic    submittal               EPA approval date                   Additional explanation
                                                area               date
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

                                                                      * * * * * * *
1997 Annual PM2.5 Attainment Plan     Delaware--Philadelphia-       4/3/08  12/17/13 [Insert page number where the    See Sec.   52.427(c).
 for Delaware and the Motor Vehicle    Wilmington,                 4/25/12   document begins].
 Emission Budgets for 2009 and 2012.   Pennsylvania-New
                                       Jersey-Delaware
                                       Nonattainment Area.
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

0
3. Section 52.427 is amended by adding paragraph (c) to read as
follows:

Sec.  52.427  Control strategy: Particulate matter.

* * * * *
    (c) EPA approves the attainment plan for the 1997 annual fine
particulate matter (PM2.5) national ambient air quality
standard (NAAQS) for the Philadelphia-Wilmington, Pennsylvania-New
Jersey-Delaware nonattainment area submitted by the Secretary of the
Delaware Department of Natural Resources and Environmental Control on
April 3, 2008, as amended on April 25, 2012. The attainment plan
includes the attainment demonstration and motor vehicle emission
budgets in tons per year (tpy) used for transportation conformity
purposes for New Castle County, Delaware. The attainment plan also
includes an analysis of reasonably available control measures and
reasonably available control technology, contingency measures and the
2002 base year emissions inventory. The 2002 base year emissions
inventory was approved in a separate rulemaking action on March 4, 2013
(78 FR 10420).

                    Delaware's Motor Vehicle Emission Budgets for the 1997 Annual PM2.5 NAAQS
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
                  Type of control strategy SIP                         Year             VOC             NOX
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Attainment Plan (Milestone Year)................................            2009             257           8,448
Attainment Plan (Out Year)......................................            2012             199           6,273
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

[FR Doc. 2013-29803 Filed 12-16-13; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6560-50-P


[Federal Register Volume 77, Number 129 (Thursday, July 5, 2012)]
[Notices]
[Page 39798]
[FR Doc No: 2012-16363]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION

Pipeline and Hazardous Materials Safety Administration

[Docket No. PHMSA-2012-0059; Notice No. 12-5]

Clarification Policy on Initial Fitness Review for Classification
Approvals

AGENCY: Pipeline and Hazardous Materials Safety Administration (PHMSA),
DOT.

ACTION: Clarification.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: This notice clarifies and provides further guidance on PHMSA's
policy of conducting fitness reviews of applicants for classification
approvals, including Fireworks, Explosives, Organic Peroxides and Self-
reactive materials.

DATES: The policy clarification discussed in this document is effective
July 5, 2012.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Mr. Ryan Paquet, Director, Approvals
and Permits Division, Office of Hazardous Materials Safety, (202) 366-
4512, PHMSA, 1200 New Jersey Avenue SE., Washington, DC 20590.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Effective immediately, Initial Fitness
Reviews (IFR) will no longer be performed by PHMSA as part of the
processing for classification approvals, including: Fireworks,
Explosives, Organic Peroxides and Self Reactive Materials.
    The use of the available agency information in the Hazmat
Intelligence Portal (HIP) and Federal Motor Carrier Safety
Administration's (FMCSA) Safety Fitness Electronic Records (SAFER)
databases do not directly and adequately indicate a company's
capability to manufacture the approved product in accordance with the
application submitted to PHMSA. This change in policy and practice will
be reflected in the next update to the Approvals Standard Operating
Procedures and in the evaluation forms completed as part of the review
process.
    Fitness of applicants for classification approvals will continue to
be reviewed through application evaluation, inspection, oversight and
intelligence received from PHMSA or another Operating Administration
(FAA, FMCSA, FRA, or USCG).

    Issued in Washington, DC, on June 28, 2012.
William Schoonover,
Deputy Associate Administrator for Field Operations, Pipeline and
Hazardous Materials Safety Administration.
[FR Doc. 2012-16363 Filed 7-3-12; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910-60-P


[Federal Register: July 3, 2007 (Volume 72, Number 127)]
[Notices]
[Page 36530-36531]
[DOCID:fr03jy07-114]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

[Release No. 34-55961; File No. SR-ISE-2007-46]

Self-Regulatory Organizations; International Securities Exchange,
LLC; Notice of Filing and Immediate Effectiveness of a Proposed Rule
Change Relating to Fee Changes

June 26, 2007.
    Pursuant to Section 19(b)(1) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934
(``Act'') \1\ and Rule 19b-4 thereunder,\2\ notice is hereby given that
on June 12, 2007, the International Securities Exchange, LLC (``ISE''
or ``Exchange'') filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission
(``Commission'') the proposed rule change as described in Items I, II,
and III below, which Items have been substantially prepared by the
Exchange. ISE has designated this proposal as one establishing or
changing a due, fee, or other charge imposed by ISE under Section
19(b)(3)(A)(ii) of the Act \3\ and Rule 19b-4(f)(2) thereunder,\4\
which renders the proposal effective upon filing with the Commission.
The Commission is publishing this notice to solicit comments on the
proposed rule change from interested persons.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \1\ 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(1).
    \2\ 17 CFR 240.19b-4.
    \3\ 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(3)(A)(ii).
    \4\ 17 CFR 240.19b-4(f)(2).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

I. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement of the Terms of Substance
of the Proposed Rule Change

    The ISE is proposing to amend its Schedule of Fees to establish
fees for transactions in options on two Premium Products.\5\ The text
of the proposed rule change is available at the Exchange, the
Commission's Public Reference Room, and http://www.iseoptions.com.

---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \5\ ``Premium Products'' is defined in the Schedule of Fees as
the products enumerated therein.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

II. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement of the Purpose of, and
Statutory Basis for, the Proposed Rule Change

    In its filing with the Commission, the Exchange included statements
concerning the purpose of and basis for the proposed rule change, and
discussed any comments it received on the proposed rule change. The
text of these statements may be examined at the places specified in
Item IV below. ISE has substantially prepared summaries, set forth in
Sections A, B, and C below, of the most significant aspects of such
statements.

A. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement of the Purpose of, and
Statutory Basis for, the Proposed Rule Change

1. Purpose
    The Exchange proposes to amend its Schedule of Fees to establish
fees for transactions in options on the following two Premium Products:
United States Natural Gas Fund (``UNG'') and United States Oil Fund
(``USO'').\6\ The Exchange represents that UNG and USO are eligible for
options trading because they constitute ``Fund Shares,'' as defined by
ISE Rule 502(h).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \6\ The United States Oil Fund, LP (``USO'') and the United
States Natural Gas Fund (``UNG'') are distributed by ALPS
Distributors, Inc. (``ALPS''), administered by Brown Brothers
Harriman & Co. (``BBH'') and Victoria Bay Asset Management
(``VBAM'') is the General Partner. ALPS, BBH and VBAM have not
licensed or authorized ISE to (i) engage in the creation, listing,
provision of a market for trading, marketing, and promotion of
options on USO and UNG or (ii) to use and refer to any of their
trademarks or service marks in connection with the listing,
provision of a market for trading, marketing, and promotion of
options on USO and UNG or with making disclosures concerning options
on USO and UNG under any applicable federal or state laws, rules or
regulations. ALPS, BBH and VBAM do not sponsor, endorse, or promote
such activity by ISE, and are not affiliated in any manner with ISE.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    All of the applicable fees covered by this filing are identical to
fees charged by the Exchange for all other Premium Products.
Specifically, the Exchange is proposing to adopt an execution fee and a
comparison fee for all transactions in options on UNG and USO.\7\ The
amount of the execution fee and comparison fee for products covered by
this filing shall be $0.15 and $0.03 per contract, respectively, for
all Public Customer Orders \8\ and Firm Proprietary orders. The amount
of the execution fee and comparison fee for all ISE Market Maker
transactions shall be equal to the execution fee and comparison fee
currently charged by the Exchange for ISE Market Maker transactions in
equity options.\9\ Finally, the amount of the execution fee and
comparison fee for all non-ISE Market Maker transactions shall be $0.37
and $0.03 per contract, respectively. Further, since options on UNG and
USO are multiply-listed, the

Payment for Order Flow fee shall also apply. The Exchange believes the
proposed rule change will further the Exchange's goal of introducing
new products to the marketplace that are competitively priced.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \7\ These fees will be charged to Exchange members. Under a
pilot program that is set to expire on July 31, 2007, these fees
will also be charged to Linkage Orders (as defined in ISE Rule
1900). See Securities Exchange Act Release No. 54204 (July 25,
2006), 71 FR 43548 (August 1, 2006) (SR-ISE-2006-38).
    \8\ ``Public Customer Order'' is defined in ISE Rule 100(a)(39)
as an order for the account of a Public Customer. ``Public
Customer'' is defined in ISE Rule 100(a)(38) as a person that is not
a broker or dealer in securities.
    \9\ The execution fee is currently between $.21 and $.12 per
contract side, depending on the Exchange Average Daily Volume, and
the comparison fee is currently $.03 per contract side.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

2. Statutory Basis
    The Exchange believes that the proposed rule change is consistent
with Section 6(b) of the Act \10\ in general, and Section 6(b)(4) of
the Act \11\ in particular, because it is designed to provide for the
equitable allocation of reasonable dues, fees, and other charges among
its members and other persons using its facilities.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \10\ 15 U.S.C. 78f(b).
    \11\ 15 U.S.C. 78f(b)(4).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

B. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement on Burden on Competition

    The proposed rule change does not impose any burden on competition
that is not necessary or appropriate in furtherance of the purposes of
the Act.

C. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement on Comments on the Proposed
Rule Change Received From Members, Participants, or Others

    The Exchange has not solicited, and does not intend to solicit,
comments on this proposed rule change. The Exchange has not received
any unsolicited written comments from members or other interested
parties.

III. Date of Effectiveness of the Proposed Rule Change and Timing for
Commission Action

    The foregoing proposed rule change has been designated as a fee
change pursuant to Section 19(b)(3)(A)(ii) of the Act \12\ and Rule
19b-4(f)(2) \13\ thereunder, because it establishes or changes a due,
fee, or other charge imposed by the Exchange. Accordingly, the proposal
took effect upon filing with the Commission. At any time within 60 days
of the filing of such proposed rule change the Commission may summarily
abrogate such rule change if it appears to the Commission that such
action is necessary or appropriate in the public interest, for the
protection of investors, or otherwise in furtherance of the purposes of
the Act.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \12\ 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(3)(A)(ii).
    \13\ 17 CFR 240.19b-4(f)(2).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

IV. Solicitation of Comments

    Interested persons are invited to submit written data, views, and
arguments concerning the foregoing, including whether the proposed rule
change is consistent with the Act. Comments may be submitted by any of
the following methods:

Electronic Comments

     Use the Commission's Internet comment form (http://www.sec.gov/rules/sro.shtml.
); or     Send an e-mail to<EMAIL_ADDRESS>Please include

File Number SR-ISE-2007-46 on the subject line.

Paper Comments

     Send paper comments in triplicate to Nancy M. Morris,
Secretary, Securities and Exchange Commission, 100 F Street, NE.,
Washington, DC 20549-1090.

All submissions should refer to File Number SR-ISE-2007-46. This file
number should be included on the subject line if e-mail is used. To
help the Commission process and review your comments more efficiently,
please use only one method. The Commission will post all comments on
the Commission's Internet Web site (http://www.sec.gov/rules/sro.shtml
). Copies of the submission, all subsequent amendments, all

written statements with respect to the proposed rule change that are
filed with the Commission, and all written communications relating to
the proposed rule change between the Commission and any person, other
than those that may be withheld from the public in accordance with the
provisions of 5 U.S.C. 552, will be available for inspection and
copying in the Commission's Public Reference Room, 100 F Street, NE.,
Washington, DC 20549, on official business days between the hours of 10
a.m. and 3 p.m. Copies of such filing also will be available for
inspection and copying at the principal office of the Exchange. All
comments received will be posted without change; the Commission does
not edit personal identifying information from submissions. You should
submit only information that you wish to make available publicly. All
submissions should refer to File Number SR-ISE-2007-46 and should be
submitted on or before July 24, 2007.

    For the Commission, by the Division of Market Regulation,
pursuant to delegated authority.\14\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \14\ 17 CFR 200.30-3(a)(12).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

Florence E. Harmon,
Deputy Secretary.
[FR Doc. E7-12777 Filed 7-2-07; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 8010-01-P


[Federal Register: April 20, 2009 (Volume 74, Number 74)]
[Notices]
[Page 17957]
[DOCID:fr20ap09-42]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission

[Docket No. ER09-511-001]

PacifiCorp; Notice of Filing

April 13, 2009.
    Take notice that on April 1, 2009, PacifiCorp filed a revised
section 1 to its LGIA Facilities Maintenance Agreement with Tasco
Engineering, Inc., Service Agreement 537 under PacifiCorp's Seventh
Revised Volume No. 11 Open Access Transmission Tariff, pursuant to the
Commission's letter order issued March 2, 2009.
    Any person desiring to intervene or to protest this filing must
file in accordance with Rules 211 and 214 of the Commission's Rules of
Practice and Procedure (18 CFR 385.211, 385.214). Protests will be
considered by the Commission in determining the appropriate action to
be taken, but will not serve to make protestants parties to the
proceeding. Any person wishing to become a party must file a notice of
intervention or motion to intervene, as appropriate. Such notices,
motions, or protests must be filed on or before the comment date.
Anyone filing a motion to intervene or protest must serve a copy of
that document on the Applicant and all the parties in this proceeding.
    The Commission encourages electronic submission of protests and
interventions in lieu of paper using the ``eFiling'' link at http://
www.ferc.gov. Persons unable to file electronically should submit an
original and 14 copies of the protest or intervention to the Federal
Energy Regulatory Commission, 888 First Street, NE., Washington, DC
20426.
    This filing is accessible on-line at http://www.ferc.gov, using the
``eLibrary'' link and is available for review in the Commission's
Public Reference Room in Washington, DC. There is an ``eSubscription''
link on the Web site that enables subscribers to receive e-mail
notification when a document is added to a subscribed docket(s). For
assistance with any FERC Online service, please e-mail
<EMAIL_ADDRESS>or call<PHONE_NUMBER> (toll free). For
TTY, call<PHONE_NUMBER>.
    Comment Date: 5 p.m. Eastern Time on April 22, 2009.

Kimberly D. Bose,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. E9-8956 Filed 4-17-09; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 6717-01-P


[Federal Register Volume 82, Number 11 (Wednesday, January 18, 2017)]
[Notices]
[Pages 5556-5557]
[FR Doc No: 2017-00985]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission

[Docket No. CP16-493-000]

Columbia Gas Transmission L.L.C.; Notice of Schedule for
Environmental Review of the Central Virginia Connector Project

    On August 12, 2016, Columbia Gas Transmission L.L.C. (Columbia)
filed an application in Docket No. CP16-493-000 requesting a
Certificate of Public Convenience and Necessity pursuant to section
7(c) of the Natural Gas Act to construct and operate certain natural
gas pipeline facilities. The proposed project is known as the Central
Virginia Connector Project (Project), and would provide an additional
45,000 dekatherms per day of natural gas capacity on Columbia's system
and modernize compression at the Louisa Compressor Station.
    On August 25, 2016 the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission

(Commission or FERC) issued its Notice of Application for the Project.
Among other things, that notice alerted agencies issuing federal
authorizations of the requirement to complete all necessary reviews and
to reach a final decision on a request for a federal authorization
within 90 days of the date of issuance of the Commission staff's
Environmental Assessment (EA) for the Project. This instant notice
identifies the FERC staff's planned schedule for the completion of the
EA for the Project.

Schedule for Environmental Review

Issuance of EA: February 28, 2017.
90-day Federal Authorization Decision Deadline: May 29, 2017.

    If a schedule change becomes necessary, additional notice will
be provided so that the relevant agencies are kept informed of the
Project's progress.

Project Description

    Columbia proposes to replace three Solar Saturn units with one
Solar Centaur 50 unit at the existing Louisa Compressor Station,
convert the replaced units to standby, increase the certificated
horsepower (HP) at the Louisa Compressor Station from 4,050 HP to 6,130
HP, install pipe and valve modifications to make the existing point of
delivery between Columbia's Mainline VM-108 and VM-109 at Boswell's
Tavern Compressor Station bi-directional, install a new point of
delivery meter station adjacent to Columbia's Goochland Compressor
Station, and install other appurtenant facilities. All work would be
performed in Louisa and Goochland Counties, Virginia.

Background

    On September 27, 2016 the Commission issued a Notice of Intent to
Prepare an Environmental Assessment for the Proposed Central Virginia
Connector Project and Request for Comments on Environmental Issues
(NOI). The NOI was sent to affected landowners; federal, state, and
local government agencies; elected officials; environmental and public
interest groups; Native American tribes; other interested parties; and
local libraries and newspapers. In response to the NOI, the Commission
received a comment from the Virginia Department of Conservation and
Recreation, which recommended strict adherence to the erosion and
sediment control measures during all land disturbing activities.

Additional Information

    In order to receive notification of the issuance of the EA and to
keep track of all formal issuances and submittals in specific dockets,
the Commission offers a free service called eSubscription. This can
reduce the amount of time you spend researching proceedings by
automatically providing you with notification of these filings,
document summaries, and direct links to the documents. Go to
www.ferc.gov/docs-filing/esubscription.asp.
    Additional information about the Project is available from the
Commission's Office of External Affairs at (866) 208-FERC or on the
FERC Web site (www.ferc.gov). Using the ``eLibrary'' link, select
``General Search'' from the eLibrary menu, enter the selected date
range and ``Docket Number'' excluding the last three digits (i.e.,
CP16-493), and follow the instructions. For assistance with access to
eLibrary, the helpline can be reached at<PHONE_NUMBER>, TTY (202) 502-
8659, or at<EMAIL_ADDRESS>The eLibrary link on the FERC
Web site also provides access to the texts of formal documents issued
by the Commission, such as orders, notices, and rule makings.

    Dated: January 11, 2017.
Kimberly D. Bose,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2017-00985 Filed 1-17-17; 8:45 am]
 BILLING CODE 6717-01-P