References Alliance of Automobile Manufacturers, Inc., the Chemical Manufacturers Association, and the Utility Water Act Group, the American Forest & Paper Association, and the US Environmental Protection Agency Settlement Agreement, October 19, 2000.

ASTM D6091, Standard Practice for 99 %/ 95 % Interlaboratory Detection Estimate ( IDE) for Analytical Methods with Negligible Calibration Error, 1991.

ASTM Practice D 2777, Standard Practice Interlaboratory Quantitation Estimate, 2000.

Barwick, V. J., and Ellison, S. L. R. ( 2000), Protocol for Uncertainty Evaluation from Validation Data, Report Number LGC/ VAM/ 1998/ 088.

Box, G. E. P., W. G. Hunter, and J. S Hunter ( 1978), Statistics for Experimenters: An Introduction to Design, Data Analysis, and Model Building, Wiley and Sons, New York.

Clayton C. A., J. W. Hines, and P. D. Elkins ( 1987), Detection Limits with Specified Assurance Probabilities, Analytical Chemistry 59: 2506 2514.

Crumbling, D. ( 2002), Environmental Quality: Closing the Decision Data Loop. Presented at 224th ACS National Meeting, Boston, MA.

Currie, L. A. ( 1968), Limits for Quantitative Detection and Quantitative Determination, Analytical Chemistry 40: 586 593.

Currie, L. A. ( 1995), Nomenclature in Evaluation of Analytical Methods including Detection and Quantification Capabilities, Pure and Appl. Chem. 67: 10, 1699 1722.

Currie, L. A. ( 1999a), Nomenclature in Evaluation of Analytical Methods Including Detection and Quantification Capabilities ( IUPAC Recommendations 1995) Anal. Chim. Acta 391, 105 126.

Currie, L. A. ( 1999b), Detection and Quantification Limits: Origins and Historical Overview, Anal. Chim. Acta 391, 127 134.

Currie, L. A. ( 2000), Detection and quantification capabilities and the evaluation of low level data: Some international perspectives and continuing challenges, J. Radioanalytical and Nuclear Chem, Vol. 245, 145 156.

Daubert v. Merrell Dow Pharmaceuticals, 509 U. S. 579 ( 1993).

Ellison, S. L. R., M. Rosslein, and A. Williams ( 2000), Quantifying Uncertainty in Analytical Measurement, 2nd ed., Eurachem/ CITAC.

Federal Register ( 1979), Guidelines Establishing Test Procedures for the Analysis of Pollutants Under the Clean Water Act; Proposed Rule ( 44 FR 69463).

Federal Register ( 1984), Guidelines Establishing Test Procedures for the Analysis of Pollutants Under the Clean Water Act; Final Rule and Interim Final Rule, and Proposed Rule ( 49 FR 43234).

February 2003 R 1 Assessment of Detection and Quantitation Approaches Federal Register ( 1987), National Primary Drinking Water Regulations  Synthetic Organic Chemicals Monitoring for Unregulated Contaminants; Final Rule, 52 FR 25699.

Federal Register ( 1992), National Primary Drinking Water Regulations; Synthetic Organic Chemicals and Inorganic Chemicals; Final Rule, 57 FR 31800.

Federal Register ( 1998), Federal Participation in the Development and Use of Voluntary Consensus Standards and in Conformity Assessment Activities, OMB Circular A 119, 63 FR 8546.

Federal Register ( 1999), Guidelines Establishing Test Procedures for the Analysis of Pollutants; Measurement of Mercury in Water ( EPA Method 1631, Revision B); Final Rule, 64 FR 30417.

Gibbons, R. D. ( 1994), Statistical Methods for Groundwater Monitoring, Wiley and Sons, New York.

Gibbons, R. D., F. H. Jarke, K. P. Stoub ( 1991), Detection Limits: For Linear Calibration Curves with Increasing Variance and Multiple Future Detection Decisions, Waste Testing and Quality Assurance: ASTM STP 1075, D. Friedman, ed., American Society for Testing and Materials, Philadelphia, 3: 337 390.

Gibbons, R. D., D. E. Coleman, and R. F. Maddalone ( 1997), Response to Comment on " An Alternative Minimum Level Definition for Analytical Quantification," Env. Sci. and Tech. 31: 7 2071 2077.

Glaser, J., D. Foerst, G. McKee, S. Quave, and W. Budde ( 1981), Trace Analyses for Wastewaters, Env. Sci. & Tech 15: 1426 1435.

Glaser, John ( 2003), e mail to Dale Rushneck, February 3, 2003,   Replicates for MDL.

Guide to the Expression of Uncertainty in Measurement ( 1993), International Organization for Standardization, Geneva.

Hahn, G. J., and W. Q. Meeker ( 1991), Statistical Intervals: A Guide for Practitioners, Wiley and Sons, New York.

Hogg, R. V., and A. T. Craig ( 1995), Introduction to Mathematical Statistics, Prentice Hall, Englewood Cliffs, NJ.

Hubaux, A. and G. Vos ( 1970), Decision and Detection Limits for Linear Calibration Curves, Analytical Chemistry 42: 849 855.

Keith, L. H., et al. ( 1983), Principles of Environmental Analysis, Anal. Chem. 55: 14, 2210 2218.

Kumho Tire Company, Ltd. v. Carmichael, 526 U. S. 137 ( 1999).

Larsen, R. J., and M. L. Marx ( 1999), Introduction to Mathematical Statistics and Its Application, Prentice Hall, Englewood Cliffs, NJ.

Maddalone, R., J. Rice, B. Edmondson, B. Nott, and J. Scott ( 1993), Defining Detection and Quantitation Levels, Water Environment and Technology 5, 41  44.

MacDougall, D., et al. ( 1980), Guidelines for Data Acquisition and Data Quality Evaluation in Environmental Chemistry, Anal. Chem. 52: 14, 2242 2249.

R 2 February 2003 Chapter 6 Oblinger Childress, C. J., W. T. Foreman, B. F. Connor, and T. J. Mahoney ( 1999), New Reporting Procedures Based on Long Term Method Detection Levels and Some Considerations for Interpretations of Water Quality Data Provided by the U. S. Geological Survey National Water Quality Laboratory, U. S. Geological Survey Open File Report 99 193, Reston, VA.

Patterson, C. C. and D. M. Settle, ( 1976), NBS Special Publication 422, Accuracy in Trace Analysis: Sampling, Sample Handling, and Analysis 1, 321.

Pratt, J. W., and J. D. Gibbons ( 1981), Concepts of Non parametric Theory, Springer Verlag, New York.

Rocke, D. and S. Lorenzato ( 1995) A Two Component Model for Measurement Error in Analytical Chemistry, Technometrics 37: 176 184.

U. S. Environmental Protection Agency ( 1972), Handbook for Analytical Quality Control in Water and Wastewater Laboratories.

U. S. Environmental Protection Agency ( 1992), Test Methods for Evaluating Solid Waste, Physical/ Chemical Methods ( SW 846), Chapter 1, Revision 1, July 1992.

U. S. Environmental Protection Agency ( 1993), Guidance on Evaluation, Resolution, and Documentation of Analytical Problems Associated with Compliance Monitoring, EPA 821 B 93 001.

U. S. Environmental Protection Agency ( 1994), Draft National Guidance for the Permitting, Monitoring, and Enforcement of Water Quality based Effluent Limitations Set Below Analytical Detection/ Quantitation Levels.

U. S. Environmental Protection Agency ( 1998), EPA s Study Plan for Characterizing Variability as a Function of Concentration for a Variety of Analytical Techniques.

U. S. Environmental Protection Agency ( 1998), Results of the Interlaboratory Validation Study of EPA Method 1631.

U. S. Environmental Protection Agency ( 1998), Study Plan for Characterizing Error as a Function of Concentration for Determination of Pollutants by Gas Chromatography/ Mass Spectrometry U. S. Environmental Protection Agency ( 1998), Science Policy Council Handbook. EPA 100 B 98 001.

U. S. Environmental Protection Agency ( 1999), EPA Method 1631, Revision B: Mercury in Water by Oxidation, Purge and Trap, and Cold Vapor Atomic Fluorescence Spectrometry, EPA 821 R 99 005.

U. S. Environmental Protection Agency ( 2000), Science Policy Council Handbook, 2nd ed.. EPA 100 B 00 001.

U. S. Environmental Protection Agency ( 2001), EPA s Guidance for Implementation and Use of EPA Method 1631 for the Determination of Low Level Mercury, EPA 821 R 01 023.

Youden, W. J. and E. H. Steiner ( 1975), Statistical Manual of the Association of Official Analytical Chemists AOAC International, Gaithersburg, MD.

February 2003 R 3


[Federal Register: September 17, 2009 (Volume 74, Number 179)]
[Notices]
[Page 47831-47837]
[DOCID:fr17se09-78]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

[Release No. 34-60653; File No. SR-NYSE-2009-89]

Self-Regulatory Organizations; New York Stock Exchange LLC;
Notice of Filing of Proposed Rule Change As Modified by Amendment No. 1
To Amend Certain Corporate Governance Requirements

September 11, 2009
    Pursuant to Section 19(b)(1) \1\ of the Securities Exchange Act of
1934 (the ``Act'') \2\ and Rule 19b-4 thereunder,\3\ notice is hereby
given that, on August 26, 2009, New York Stock Exchange LLC (``NYSE''
or the ``Exchange'') filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission
(the ``Commission'') the proposed rule change as described in Items I,
II, and III below, which Items have been prepared by the self-
regulatory organization. NYSE filed Amendment No. 1 to the proposed
rule change on September 10, 2009.\4\ The Commission is publishing this
notice to solicit comments on the proposed rule change, as amended,
from interested persons.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \1\ 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(1).
    \2\ 15 U.S.C. 78a.
    \3\ 17 CFR 240.19b-4.
    \4\ In Amendment No. 1, NYSE added a sentence to the purpose
section describing where a copy of the proposed rule change may be
obtained; clarified a sentence in the purpose section; revised the
statutory basis section; and underlined a parenthetical in the
proposed rule text to show new text.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

I. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement of the Terms of Substance
of the Proposed Rule Change

    The Exchange proposes to amend certain of its corporate governance
requirements set forth in Section 303A of the Listed Company Manual
(the ``Manual''). The text of the proposed rule change is available on
the Exchange's Web site (http://www.nyse.com), at the Exchange's Office
of the Secretary, and at the Commission's Public Reference Room.

II. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement of the Purpose of, and
Statutory Basis for, Proposed Rule Change

    In its filing with the Commission, the self-regulatory organization
included statements concerning the purpose of, and basis for, the
proposed rule change and discussed any comments it received on the
proposed rule change. The text of those statements may be examined at
the places specified in Item IV below. The Exchange has prepared
summaries, set forth in sections A, B, and C below, of the most
significant parts of such statements.

A. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement of the Purpose of, and
Statutory Basis for, the Proposed Rule Change

1. Purpose
    On November 4, 2003, the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission
(the ``SEC'') approved Section 303A of the Listed Company Manual. This
section imposed significant corporate governance requirements on the
Exchange's listed companies and focused mainly on director independence
and the duties of the audit, nomination and compensation committees of
the board. The Exchange now proposes to amend Section 303A to clarify
some of the disclosure requirements, to codify certain interpretations
made since the rules were enacted, and to replace certain disclosure
requirements by incorporating into the Exchange's rules the applicable
disclosure requirements of Regulation S-K. In addition, the Exchange is
proposing to eliminate the current requirements of Section 307.00 and
redesignate Section 303A.14 as Section 307.
    The proposed changes to Sections 303A and 307.00 will not take
effect until January 1, 2010. Consequently, the existing text of these
sections will remain in the Listed Company Manual through December 31,
2009 and will be removed immediately thereafter. Upon approval of this
filing, the amended versions of those sections will also be included in
the Listed Company Manual, with introductory text indicating that the
revised text does not become operative until January 1, 2010.
    The Exchange proposes to amend references to the ``company''
throughout Section 303A to the ``listed company,'' wherever the context
makes that change appropriate.
    The discussion below begins with a description of the proposed
approach to corporate governance disclosures, as this approach is
adopted consistently in numerous instances throughout Section 303A.
There then follows a detailed section-by-section description of all of
the other proposed changes.
    Corporate Governance Disclosures:
    On August 29, 2006, in connection with amendments to its executive
compensation and related person disclosure, the SEC adopted Item 407 of
Regulation S-K to consolidate director independence and related
corporate governance disclosure requirements under a single item and
update such

disclosure requirements regarding director independence to reflect the
SEC's own disclosure requirements, as well as the principal U.S.
markets' listing standards.\5\ These rules duplicate some of the NYSE's
Section 303A corporate governance disclosure requirements. Indeed, in
some instances, the SEC's rules require more detailed disclosures than
are currently required by Section 303A.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \5\ See Securities Act Release No. 33-8732A (August 29, 2006).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    Since the adoption of Item 407, the Exchange has received numerous
calls from listed companies requesting guidance from the Exchange on
whether compliance with the disclosure requirements of Item 407 would
also satisfy their obligations under Section 303A. For example, Section
303A.02(a) provides that the board of directors of a listed company may
adopt and disclose categorical standards to assist it in making
determinations of independence and may make a general disclosure if a
director meets these standards. Item 407(a)(3), on the other hand,
requires that companies describe by specific category or type, any
transactions, relationships or arrangements (other than those disclosed
pursuant to Item 404(a) of Regulation S-K) that were considered by the
board of directors with respect to each director that is identified as
independent. As a result, while Section 303A.02(a) would only require
that companies disclose the categories of relationships that were per
se deemed to be immaterial with respect to board independence, Item
407(a)(3) goes further, requiring that companies also disclose which
directors had relationships that fall into the categorical standards
utilized by the board in determining independence.
    In an effort to avoid duplication and confusion, the Exchange is
proposing to eliminate each disclosure requirement currently included
in Section 303A that is also required by Item 407 and to incorporate
directly into Section 303A the applicable disclosure requirement of
Item 407. The Exchange believes that, since Item 407 requires
duplicative or more specific disclosures than Section 303A, such
elimination will facilitate compliance for listed companies, while
providing investors with significant transparency on corporate
governance. While this approach may appear to be redundant, the
incorporation of certain requirements of Item 407 into Section 303A
serves an important purpose in that companies whose Item 407 disclosure
is deficient will be deemed to be out of compliance with Exchange
rules. Consequently, the Exchange will be able to take actions against
a noncompliant company, ranging from appending a below compliance
(``BC'') indicator to the company's ticker symbol to issuing a public
reprimand letter and, in extreme cases, delisting.
    The following are the disclosure items that will be eliminated and
the provisions of Item 407 that will be added:
     The Section 303A.00 controlled company exemption
disclosure requirement is replaced by a requirement that a controlled
company that chooses to take advantage of any or all of the available
Section 303A controlled company exemptions must comply with the
disclosure requirements in Instruction 1 to Item 407(a).
     The Section 303A.02(a) independent director disclosure
requirement is replaced by a requirement that the listed company must
comply with the disclosure requirements in Item 407(a).
     The Section 303A.05(b)(i)(C) compensation committee
charter requirement to produce a compensation committee report is
replaced by a requirement to prepare the disclosure required by Item
407(e)(5).
     The Section 303A.07(c)(i)(B) audit committee charter
requirement to prepare an audit committee report is replaced by a
requirement to prepare the disclosure required by Item 407(d)(3)(i).
    The Exchange is also proposing to move the audit, compensation and
nominating committee charter, corporate governance guidelines and code
of business conduct and ethics Web site posting requirements to a new
Web site Posting Requirement section in each of the applicable
subsections of Section 303A. The Web site Posting Requirement section
of Section 303A.07 will specify that closed-end funds are not subject
to the requirement to post their audit committee charter on their Web
site. This is consistent with the Exchange's current practice, as
Section 303A.00 specifically exempts closed-end funds from the
application of Section 303A.09.
    The Exchange is proposing to change the disclosure regarding Web
site postings to just require a listed company to disclose in its
annual proxy statement or Form 10-K that the applicable charters,
corporate governance guidelines and code of business conduct and ethics
are available on the company's Web site, providing the company's Web
site address. This will conform the Exchange's disclosure requirements
with respect to committee charters to the disclosure required by
Instruction 2 to Item 407. The Exchange proposes to eliminate the
requirement in Sections 303A.09 and 303A.10 that the listed company
disclose that hard copies of the charters, guidelines and code are
available in print upon request. The Exchange believes that it is
unnecessary to require companies to provide physical copies of these
documents upon request when they are readily accessible on the
company's Web site.
    Section 303A currently contains certain disclosure requirements
that require listed companies to make the required disclosures in the
company's annual proxy statement, or, if the company does not file an
annual proxy statement, in the company's annual report filed with the
SEC. The Exchange proposes to amend these requirements so that
companies will have the option of either continuing to provide these
disclosures in the annual proxy statement or annual report, as
applicable, or making the disclosures on or through the company's Web
site. If a company chooses to make the applicable disclosure on or
through its Web site, it must disclose that fact in its annual proxy
statement or annual report, as applicable, and provide the Web site
address. The disclosure requirements amended [sic] as described in this
paragraph are as follows:
     The disclosure requirement of Section 303A.02(b)(v) with
respect to contributions made by the listed company to any tax exempt
organization in which any independent director serves as an executive
officer if, within the preceding three years, contributions in any
single fiscal year from the listed company to the organization exceeded
the greater of $1 million, or 2% of such tax exempt organization's
consolidated gross revenues.
     The disclosure requirement of Section 303A.03 with respect
to the identity of the director chosen to preside at executive sessions
of non-management or independent directors or, if the same individual
is not the presiding director at every meeting, the procedure by which
a presiding director is selected for each executive session.
     The requirement of Section 303A.03 that listed companies
must disclose a method for interested parties to communicate directly
with the presiding director or the non-management or independent
directors as a group.
     The disclosure requirement of Section 303A.07(a) with
respect to the board's determination that the service of any audit
committee member on more than three public company audit committees
does not impair the ability

of such audit committee member to serve effectively on the listed
company's audit committee.
    If a listed company makes a required Section 303A disclosure in its
annual proxy statement, or if the company does not file an annual proxy
statement, in its annual report filed with the SEC, it may incorporate
such disclosure by reference from another document that is filed with
the SEC to the extent permitted by applicable SEC rules.
    Where a listed company has the option of making a required
disclosure under Section 303A in an annual report filed with the SEC
and is not a company required to file a Form 10-K, a new ``Disclosure
Requirements'' subsection of Section 303A.00 provides that the
provision shall be interpreted to mean the annual periodic disclosure
form that the listed company does file with the SEC. For example, for a
closed-end management company, the appropriate form would be the annual
Form N-CSR. This approach is identical to that of the current
``References to Form 10-K'' subsection of Section 303A.00 which is
being eliminated as part of the reorganization of Section 303A.00. The
reference in the ``References to Form 10-K'' subsection of Section
303A.00 to companies that are not required to file either an annual
proxy statement or an annual periodic report with the SEC is not
carried over into the new ``Disclosure Requirements'' section, as there
are no companies that have disclosure obligations under Section 303A
that are not subject to one of these filing requirements.
    Section 303A.00--Introduction:
    Under the Exchange's current rules, companies listing in
conjunction with an initial public offering (``IPO'') are able to phase
in their independent audit, nominating and compensation committees, but
are required to have one independent director on each committee as of
the date of listing. Market practice, however, is that a company does
not normally appoint independent directors to its board in advance of
the date it lists on the NYSE. Instead, the initial board meeting is
held sometime after the listing date but prior to the date that the
transaction closes.
    In light of this practice, the Exchange proposes to amend the
Introduction section of Section 303A to clarify its requirements by
specifying that companies listing in conjunction with an IPO, spin-off
or carve-out must be in compliance with the applicable provisions of
the SEC's audit committee requirements set forth in Rule 10A-3, which
is incorporated into the Exchange's corporate governance rules as
Section 303A.06, as of the listing date. The Exchange proposes to
define the listing date for these purposes as the date the company's
securities first trade on the Exchange (trading may be regular way or
when issued). The Exchange is also proposing to require that a company
listing in conjunction with its IPO, spin-off or carve-out have a
majority of independent members on its audit committee within 90 days
of the effective date of its registration statement and a fully
independent committee within one year of the effective date of its
registration statement.
    Section 303A.07(a) requires a company to have a minimum of three
members on the audit committee as of the date of listing. As a result,
companies on the NYSE that are not required to have a fully independent
audit committee until one year from the listing date may be forced to
appoint non-independent directors to the audit committee in order to
satisfy the three-person minimum. The Exchange proposes in the
Introduction section to clarify that companies listing in conjunction
with an IPO, spin-off or carve-out may also phase in compliance with
the three-person minimum on the following schedule: At least one member
by the listing date, at least two members within 90 days of the listing
date and at least three members within one year of the listing date.
Alternatively, the company may choose to have non-independent directors
on the audit committee subject to the independent director phase-in
requirements as discussed below.
    For purposes of Rule 10A-3, the SEC provides that a company is
listing in conjunction with an IPO only to the extent that, immediately
prior to the effective date of the registration statement relating to
the IPO, the company is not ``required to file'' periodic reports with
the SEC under the Act. The Exchange has been advised by the staff of
the SEC that a company that voluntarily files reports under the Act may
be considered an IPO and avail itself of the IPO transitions under Rule
10A-3. The Exchange proposes to clarify that a company that was
required to file periodic reports with the SEC prior to listing is
precluded from including non-independent directors on its audit
committee during the phase-in period.
    The Exchange also proposes to amend the Introduction section to
clarify that companies listing in connection with an IPO must:
     Satisfy the majority independent board requirement of
Section 303A.01, if applicable, within one year of the listing date.
     Satisfy the Web site posting requirements of Sections
303A.04, 303A.05, 303A.07(b), 303A.09 and 303A.10, to the extent such
sections are applicable, by the earlier of the date the initial public
offering closes or five business days from the listing date.
     Have at least one independent member on its nominating
committee and at least one independent member on its compensation
committee as required by Sections 303A.04 and 303A.05, if applicable,
by the earlier of the date the initial public offering closes or five
business days from the listing date, at least a majority of independent
members on each committee within 90 days of the listing date and fully
independent committees within one year of the listing date.
    The Exchange proposes to amend the Introduction section to clarify
that companies listing in conjunction with a carve-out or spin-off
transaction must:
     Satisfy the majority independent board requirement of
Section 303A.01, if applicable, within one year of the listing date.
     Satisfy the Web site posting requirements of Sections
303A.04, 303A.05, 303A.07(b), 303A.09 and 303A.10, to the extent such
sections are applicable, by the date the transaction closes.
     Have at least one independent member on its nominating
committee and at least one independent member on its compensation
committee as required by Sections 303A.04 and 303A.05, if applicable,
by the date the transaction closes, at least a majority of independent
members on each committee within 90 days of the listing date and fully
independent committees within one year of the listing date.
    In addition, the Exchange proposes to include sections detailing
the compliance requirements applicable to a company that (i) lists upon
emergence from bankruptcy; (ii) transfers from another market; (iii)
ceases to be a controlled company; or (iv) ceases to be a foreign
private issuer.
    Companies that list upon emergence from bankruptcy will be able to
phase in majority independent boards and independent nominating and
compensation committees on the same schedule as companies listing in
conjunction with an IPO. The applicable compliance dates, however, will
run from the listing date. A company listing upon emergence from
bankruptcy will be required to have a fully compliant audit committee
at the time of listing unless an exemption is available to it under
Rule 10A-3.
    Currently, the rule provides that companies listing upon transfer
from

another market have one year from the date of transfer in which to
comply with any requirement to the extent the market on which they were
listed did not have the same requirement. The Exchange proposes to
amend this section to apply only to companies registered pursuant to
Section 12(b) of the Act that transfer to the NYSE. If the other
exchange had a substantially similar requirement and the company was
afforded a transition period that had not expired, the company will
have the same transition period as would have been available to it on
the other exchange.
    Companies registered pursuant to Section 12(g) of the Act that
transfer to the NYSE would not have been subject to corporate
governance standards at the time of transfer. Therefore, the Exchange
believes that it would not be appropriate for such companies to have 12
months to comply with every aspect of the Exchange's corporate
governance rules. Instead, the Exchange proposes to treat such
companies like a company listing in connection with an IPO. The
applicable compliance dates, however, would run from the listing date
and since such companies were required to file periodic reports with
the SEC prior to listing, only independent directors would be permitted
on the audit committee during the transition period.
    Companies that cease to be controlled companies will be able to
phase in majority independent boards and independent nominating and
compensation committees on the same schedule as companies listing in
conjunction with an IPO. The applicable compliance dates, however, will
run from the date that the company's status changed.
    The Exchange also proposes to clarify its requirements as to when a
company is a controlled company. The Exchange's current rule defines a
controlled company as a listed company of which more than 50% of the
voting power is held by an individual, group or another company. Since
Section 303A was approved in 2003, the Exchange has had a number of
inquiries as to what constitutes a ``group'' for purposes of the
controlled company definition. It also came to the Exchange's attention
that some companies were claiming to be owned by a ``group'' where a
shareholder agreement existed relating only to the disposition of
assets. The Exchange proposes, therefore, to make it clear that, in
order to be deemed a controlled company, more than 50% of the voting
power for the election of directors must be held by an individual,
group or another company.
    When a foreign private issuer ceases to qualify as such under SEC
rules (so that it is required to file on domestic forms with the SEC),
it may become subject to a number of requirements under Section 303A
that it was not previously subject to if its home country practice
differed from the applicable requirements of Section 303A. Depending
upon the type of issuer, these may include the requirement to have
independent nominating and compensation committees and a majority of
independent directors. In addition, the company's directors may be
required to meet the Section 303A.02 definition of independence,
including with respect to their existing audit committee members. The
Exchange proposes to modify its rules to take into consideration recent
changes in Rule 3b-4-\6\ of the Act which enables a foreign private
issuer to test its eligibility once a year. Specifically, the Exchange
proposes to require a company that ceases to be a foreign private
issuer to be in compliance with the domestic company requirements of
Section 303A as follows:
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \6\ 17 CFR 240.3b-4.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

     The company must satisfy the majority independent board
requirement of Section 303A.01, if applicable, within six months of the
date it fails to qualify for foreign private issuer status pursuant to
SEC Rule 240.3b-4. Under SEC Rule 240.3b-4, a company tests its status
as a foreign private issuer on an annual basis at the end of its most
recently completed second fiscal quarter (the ``Determination Date'').
     The company must satisfy the Web site posting requirements
of Sections 303A.04, 303A.05, 303A.07(b), 303A.09 and 303A.10, to the
extent such sections are applicable, within six months of the
Determination Date.
     The company must have fully independent nominating and
compensation committees as required by Sections 303A.04 and 303A.05, if
applicable, within six months of the Determination Date.
     The company's audit committee members must be in
compliance with the independence requirements of Section 303A.02, if
applicable, within six months of the Determination Date.
     The company must comply with the three-person audit
committee requirement of Section 303A.07(a) within six months of the
Determination Date.
     The company must comply with the shareholder approval
requirements of Section 303A.08 by the Determination Date, subject to
the provisions in Section 303A.08 under the heading ``Ongoing
Transition Period for a Foreign Private Issuer Whose Status Changes.''
    Prior to the amendment of Sections 203.01 and 103 in August
2006,\7\ Section 203.01 required listed companies to distribute to
their shareholders each year an annual report containing audited
financial statements. Section 103 permitted foreign private issuers to
distribute a summary annual report in fulfillment of their obligations
under Section 203.01. As amended, Sections 203.01 and 103 no longer
require the physical distribution of annual reports. Instead, companies
are required to post their annual report filed with the SEC on or
through their Web site. The Exchange proposes to conform Section 303A
to these amendments by eliminating from Section 303A all references to
annual reports previously required under Section 203.01 and summary
annual reports previously permitted under Section 103.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \7\ See Securities Exchange Act Release No. 54344 (August 21,
2006); 71 FR 51260 (August 29, 2006) (SR-NYSE-2005-68).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    The Exchange also proposes to revise the Introduction section to
more clearly specify which issuers are required to comply with Section
303A.08 and to delete the section relating to effective dates due to
the fact that the rules are fully applicable, other than for the
specified transition periods. The Exchange notes that it proposes to
clarify that closed-end funds are subject to Section 303A.08. The fact
that Section 303A.00 does not currently appear to require closed-end
funds to comply with Section 303A.08 results from an oversight on the
part of the Exchange.
    The Exchange is adding a reference in the ``Preferred and Debt
Listings'' subsection of the Introduction section to specify that,
except as otherwise provided by Rule 10A-3 under the Act, Section 303A
does not apply to securities listed under Section 703.22 (``Equity
Index-Linked Securities, Commodity-Linked Securities and Currency-
Linked Securities'') of the Listed Company Manual. Section 703.22 had
not yet been adopted at the time that Section 303A.00 was adopted.
Securities listed under Section 703.22 are debt securities and, as
companies listing only debt securities on the Exchange are generally
not subject to Section 303A, the Exchange believes it is consistent to
adopt the same approach with issuers of securities listed under Section
703.22. In addition, the Exchange proposes to move the reference to
securities listed under

Section 703.21 (``Equity-linked Debt Securities'') from the ``Other
Entities'' subsection of the Introduction section to the ``Preferred
and Debt Listings'' subsection, as securities listed under Section
703.21 are debt securities and are more properly subject to the
corporate governance requirements applicable to debt securities. To the
extent that Rule 10A-3 applies to the issuer of a security listed under
either Section 703.21 or Section 703.22, such issuer will be required
to comply with Sections 303A.06 and 303A.12(b). The Exchange also
proposes to delete the reference to Section 703.16 (``Investment
Company Units'', more commonly referred to as ``Exchange-Traded Funds''
or ``ETFs'') in the ``Other Entities'' subsection as ETFs are covered
by the ``Closed-End and Open-End Funds'' subsection of the Introduction
section.
    The ``Closed-End and Open-End Fund'' subsection of the
``Introduction'' section is amended to clarify the requirements
applicable to closed-end funds. Closed-end funds must comply with the
requirements of Sections 303A.06, 303A.07(a), 303A.07(b), 303A.08 and
303A.12 with the following exceptions:
     A closed-end fund is not required to comply with the
director independence requirements of Section 303A.02 incorporated into
Section 303A.07(a) (this exemption already exists in the current rule,
but the Exchange is proposing to move the requirement to comply with
the director independence requirements of Section 303A.02 from its
current position in Section 303A.07(b) to Section 303A.07(a), requiring
a conforming change in the ``Closed-End and Open-End Fund'' subsection
of the ``Introduction'' section. A similar conforming change is
required in the paragraph discussing Business Development Companies).
     Closed-end funds are not required to comply with the
Disclosure Requirements in Section 303A.07(a), when a director serves
on multiple boards in the same fund complex as such service will be
counted as one board for purposes of Section 303A (this exemption is
already in the ``Closed-End and Open-End Fund'' subsection of the
``Introduction'' section).
     A closed-end fund is not required to make the audit
committee charter required by Section 303A.07(b) available on or
through its Web site (this specifies the existence of an exemption that
is implicit in the current rule).
    Section 303A.02--Independence Requirements:
    The Exchange proposes to revise the General Commentary to Section
303A.02(b) to clarify that references to a listed company or any other
company relevant to the independence standards of Section 303A.02(b)
include any parent or subsidiary in a consolidated group with such
company.
    The Exchange proposes to delete the ``Transition Rule'' subsection
of Section 303A.02(b) as the transition period has ended.
    Section 303A.03--Requirement for meetings of non-management
directors:
    The Exchange's current rule requires that listed companies hold
regular meetings of non-management directors and recommends that
companies schedule a meeting of independent directors at least once a
year. Some companies have expressed a preference to holding regular
executive sessions of just independent directors. The Exchange believes
that allowing companies to hold regular executive sessions of
independent directors satisfies the original intention of the rule, so
the Exchange proposes to revise the Commentary accordingly.
    The Exchange is also proposing to clarify the fact that all
interested parties, not only shareholders, must be able to communicate
their concerns regarding the listed company to the presiding director,
or the non-management or independent directors as a group.
    Section 303A.05--Requirements for Compensation Committees:
    The current responsibilities designated to the compensation
committee include the review and approval of corporate goals,
objectives, and the CEO's performance as they relate to CEO
compensation. The committee also makes recommendations to the board
regarding compensation of non-CEO executive officers.
    The Exchange proposes to update the current requirement for the
compensation committee to produce a report to reflect the disclosure
required by Item 407(e)(5) of Regulation S-K regarding compensation of
executive officers.
    Section 303A.06--Requirements for Audit Committees:
    In an effort to highlight listed companies' disclosure
requirements, the Exchange proposes to revise the Commentary to Section
303A.06 to specifically point out that Rule 10A-3 requires disclosure
of reliance on certain exceptions contained in that rule.
    Section 303A.07--Duties of the Audit Committee:
    The Exchange is proposing to combine the Section 303A.07(a)
requirement for a listed company to have an audit committee comprised
of a minimum of three members with the Section 303A.07(b) requirement
that such audit committee members must meet the independence standards
set forth in Section 303A.02 and, in the absence of an applicable
exemption, Rule 10A-3 and to renumber the remaining parts of Section
303A.07.
    In addition, Section 303A.07(a) currently requires that, if an
audit committee member simultaneously serves on the audit committees of
more than three public companies, and the listed company does not limit
the number of audit committees on which its audit committee members
serve to three or less, then in each case, the board must determine
that such simultaneous service would not impair the ability of such
member to effectively serve on the listed company's audit committee and
must disclose such determination. The current language has led to some
confusion that disclosure is only required to the extent that the
listed company does not limit the number of audit committees on which
its audit committee members serve to three or less. The Exchange
proposes to amend the language to make clear that the mandated
disclosure is required to the extent that an audit committee member
simultaneously serves on the audit committees of more than three public
companies.
    Section 303A.07 requires that a company's audit committee charter
must provide that the audit committee will meet to review and discuss
the company's financial statements and must review the company's
specific Management's Discussion and Analysis disclosures. Closed-end
funds, however, are not subject to the requirement to provide this
disclosure. The Exchange proposes to add language to the Commentary to
make clear that, if a closed-end fund chooses to voluntarily include a
``Management's Discussion of Fund Performance'' in its Form N-CSR, its
audit committee is required to meet to review and discuss it. The
Exchange also intends to clarify that telephonic conference calls
constitute meetings for purposes of Section 303A.07 if allowed by
applicable corporate law, but that polling directors is not allowed in
lieu of a meeting.
    The Exchange proposes to update the current requirement for the
audit committee to produce a report to reflect the disclosure required
by Item 407(d)(3)(i).
    Section 303A.08--Shareholder Approval of Equity Compensation Plans:
    The Exchange proposes to revise the ``Transition Rules'' section of
this item to specify that the effective date of this listing standard
was June 30, 2003 and

to eliminate references to transitional provisions that are no longer
relevant in light of the expiration of the specified transition
periods.
    To the extent that a listed foreign private issuer ceases to
qualify as such under SEC rules (so that it is required to file on
domestic forms with the SEC) and as a result of such change in status
becomes subject to Section 303A.08 for the first time, such company
will be granted a limited transition period with respect to
discretionary plans and formula plans that do not comply with Section
303A.08 that were in place prior to the date that its status changed so
that additional grants may be made after the date that its status
changed without shareholder approval. This transition period will end
upon the later to occur of:
     Six months after the date as of which the company fails to
qualify for foreign private issuer status pursuant to SEC Rule 240.3b-
4. Under SEC Rule 240.3b-4, a company tests its status as a foreign
private issuer on an annual basis at the end of its most recently
completed second fiscal quarter (the ``Determination Date''); and
     the first annual meeting after the Determination Date,
but, in any event no later than one year after the Determination Date.
    A shareholder-approved formula plan may continue to be used after
the end of this transition period if it is amended to provide for a
term of ten years or less from the date of its original adoption or, if
later, the date of its most recent shareholder approval. Such an
amendment may be made before or after the Determination Date, and would
not itself be considered a ``material revision'' requiring shareholder
approval.
    In addition, a formula plan may continue to be used, without
shareholder approval, if the grants after the date that the company's
status changed are made only from the shares available immediately
before the Determination Date, in other words, based on formulaic
increases that occurred prior to the Determination Date.
    A shareholder-approved formula plan may continue to be used after
the end of this transition period if it is amended to provide for a
term of ten years or less from the date of its original adoption or, if
later, the date of its most recent shareholder approval. Such an
amendment may be made before or after the date that the company's
status changed, and would not itself be considered a ``material
revision'' requiring shareholder approval.
    In addition, a formula plan may continue to be used, without
shareholder approval, if the grants after the date that the company's
status changed are made only from the shares available immediately
before the date that the company's status changed, in other words,
based on formulaic increases that occurred prior to the date that the
company's status changed.
    Section 303A.10--Code of Business Conduct and Ethics:
    Section 303A.10 requires that listed companies disclose any waiver
of the code of business conduct and ethics granted to executive
officers and directors. The Exchange proposes to specify that the
waiver must be disclosed to shareholders within four business days of
such determination and that disclosure must be made by distributing a
press release, providing Web site disclosure, or by filing a current
report on Form 8-K with the SEC. This proposed approach varies slightly
from the guidance currently provided by Question G-1 of the NYSE's
Frequently Asked Questions on Section 303A, which provides that the
waiver must be disclosed to shareholders within two to three business
days of the board's determination. The Exchange is proposing a four-day
period to be uniform with the requirements of Item 5.05 of Form 8-K
regarding disclosure of waivers from codes of ethics and will revise
the answer in the FAQs accordingly.
    Section 303A.11--Foreign Private Issuer Disclosure:
    Section 303A.11 requires that foreign private issuers disclose the
significant differences between the corporate governance practices
followed by the company in its home country and the requirements of
Section 303A applicable to U.S. companies. Currently, companies have a
choice to make that disclosure either in their annual report to
shareholders or on their corporate Web sites. Under Item 16G of Form
20-F (which became effective for filings relating to fiscal years
ending on or after December 15, 2008), foreign private issuers that
file their annual report on Form 20-F are now required to include the
disclosure of significant differences on the Form 20-F. Therefore, to
avoid confusing and duplicative requirements, the Exchange proposes to
require foreign private issuers that are required to file an annual
report on Form 20-F with the SEC to include the statement of
significant differences in that annual report. All other foreign
private issuers will have the choice to either (i) include the
statement of significant differences in an annual report filed with the
SEC or (ii) make the statement of significant differences available on
or through the company's Web site. If the statement of significant
differences is made available on or through the company's Web site, the
company must disclose that fact in its annual report filed with the SEC
and provide the Web site address.
    Section 303A.12--Certification Requirements:
    Currently, Section 303A.12(a) requires that listed companies
disclose that they filed the CEO certification required by the NYSE and
any certifications required by the SEC in the following year's annual
report. This requirement has caused significant confusion due to the
fact that it relates to filings that were made in the previous year.
The Exchange proposes to eliminate this disclosure requirement in light
of several factors. First, the Exchange notes that at the time the
Section 303A.12(a) disclosure requirement was adopted, the SEC had not
yet amended the exhibit requirements of Form 10-K to require that the
SEC certification be included as an exhibit to the company's annual
report filed with the SEC. The Exchange also notes that with respect to
disclosure on whether a company submitted a qualified annual written
affirmation to the NYSE during the previous year, investors now have
timely notification of all material non-compliance with the NYSE's
listing standards due to the SEC's amended requirements relating to
Form 8-K filings (Item 3.01 of Form 8-K requires registrants to file a
Form 8-K disclosing any noncompliance with Exchange rules and any
action or response that, at the time of filing, the registrant has
determined to take regarding its noncompliance, within four business
days of either (i) notification by the Exchange of the registrant's
noncompliance with an Exchange rule or (ii) notification by the
registrant to the Exchange that the registrant is aware of a material
noncompliance with an Exchange rule). In addition, the NYSE has a
program of appending a below compliance (``BC'') indicator to the
ticker symbol of an issuer that is non-compliant with the Exchange's
corporate governance standards. In light of the above, the Exchange has
reevaluated the benefit of its current disclosure requirements and
believes that disclosure regarding the previous year's compliance is
unnecessary.
    The Exchange is also proposing to revise Section 303A.12(b) to
specify that listed companies must notify the Exchange in writing after
any executive officer of the listed company becomes aware of any non-
compliance with Section 303A, as opposed to requiring

notification in the event of ``material non-compliance'' as provided by
the current rule.
    Section 303A.14--Web site requirement:
    Listed companies have expressed confusion regarding the placement
within Section 303A of the requirement contained in Section 303A.14
that each listed company must maintain a publicly accessible Web site.
As a result, the Exchange proposes to redesignate Section 303A.14 as
Section 307.00 and to clarify in the commentary that this requirement
applies to companies subject to Web site posting requirements under any
applicable provision of the Listed Company Manual, rather than just
Section 303A. Section 307 will specify that companies' Web sites must
be accessible from the United States, must clearly indicate in the
English language the location of the documents on the Web site that are
required to be posted and such documents must be printable in the
English language.
    Section 307.00:
    Section 307.00 of the Listed Company Manual sets out guidance
regarding related party transactions. As this guidance is duplicative
of Section 314 (``Related Party Transactions'') and is therefore
redundant, the Exchange proposes to eliminate Section 307.
2. Statutory Basis
    The basis under the Act for this proposed rule change is the
requirement under Section 6(b)(5) \8\ that an exchange have rules that
are designed to prevent fraudulent and manipulative acts and practices,
to promote just and equitable principles of trade, to remove
impediments to, and perfect the mechanism of a free and open market
and, in general, to protect investors and the public interest. The
Exchange believes the proposed amendments are consistent with the
protection of investors and the public interest, as they simply apply
existing principles of Section 303A to situations not currently covered
by the rules, clarify existing interpretations of Exchange rules and
harmonize Exchange disclosure requirements with those of the Commission
and, therefore, do not substantively lessen the Exchange's regulatory
requirements for listed companies.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \8\ 15 U.S.C. 78f(b)(5).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

B. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement on Burden on Competition

    The Exchange does not believe that the proposed rule change will
impose any burden on competition that is not necessary or appropriate
in furtherance of the purposes of the Act.

C. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement on Comments on the Proposed
Rule Change Received From Members, Participants, or Others

    No written comments were solicited or received with respect to the
proposed rule change.

III. Date of Effectiveness of the Proposed Rule Change and Timing for
Commission Action

    Within 35 days of the date of publication of this notice in the
Federal Register or within such longer period (i) as the Commission may
designate up to 90 days of such date if it finds such longer period to
be appropriate and publishes its reasons for so finding or (ii) as to
which the self-regulatory organization consents, the Commission will:
    (A) By order approve the proposed rule change, or
    (B) Institute proceedings to determine whether the proposed rule
change should be disapproved.

IV. Solicitation of Comments

    Interested persons are invited to submit written data, views, and
arguments concerning the foregoing, including whether the proposed rule
change is consistent with the Act. Comments may be submitted by any of
the following methods:

Electronic Comments

     Use the Commission's Internet comment form (http://
www.sec.gov/rules/sro.shtml); or
     Send an e-mail to<EMAIL_ADDRESS>Please include
File Number SR-NYSE-2009-89 on the subject line.

Paper Comments

     Send paper comments in triplicate to Elizabeth M. Murphy,
Secretary, Securities and Exchange Commission, 100 F Street, NE.,
Washington, DC 20549-1090.

    All submissions should refer to File Number SR-NYSE-2009-89. This
file number should be included on the subject line if e-mail is used.
To help the Commission process and review your comments more
efficiently, please use only one method. The Commission will post all
comments on the Commission's Internet Web site (http://www.sec.gov/
rules/sro.shtml). Copies of the submission, all subsequent amendments,
all written statements with respect to the proposed rule change that
are filed with the Commission, and all written communications relating
to the proposed rule change between the Commission and any person,
other than those that may be withheld from the public in accordance
with the provisions of 5 U.S.C. 552, will be available for inspection
and copying in the Commission's Public Reference Section, 100 F Street,
NE., Washington, DC 20549-1090 on official business days between the
hours of 10 a.m. and 3 p.m. Copies of the filing will also be available
for inspection and copying at the NYSE's principal office and on its
Internet Web site at www.nyse.com. All comments received will be posted
without change; the Commission does not edit personal identifying
information from submissions. You should submit only information that
you wish to make available publicly. All submissions should refer to
File Number SR-NYSE-2009-89 and should be submitted on or before
October 5, 2009.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \9\ 17 CFR 200.30-3(a)(12).

    For the Commission, by the Division of Trading and Markets,
pursuant to delegated authority.\9\
Florence E. Harmon,
Deputy Secretary.
[FR Doc. E9-22392 Filed 9-16-09; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 8010-01-P


[Federal Register Volume 82, Number 241 (Monday, December 18, 2017)]
[Notices]
[Pages 60006-60007]
[FR Doc No: 2017-27175]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission

Combined Notice of Filings #1

    Take notice that the Commission received the following electric
corporate filings:

    Docket Numbers: EC18-30-000.
    Applicants: Mojave Solar LLC, Arizona Solar One LLC, Algonquin
Power & Utilities Corp.
    Description: Application for Authorization Under Section 203 of the
Federal Power Act for the Disposition of Jurisdictional Facilities, et
al. of Mojave Solar LLC, et al.
    Filed Date: 12/8/17.
    Accession Number: 20171208-5158.
    Comments Due: 5 p.m. ET 12/29/17.

    Take notice that the Commission received the following electric
rate filings:

    Docket Numbers: ER18-251-005.
    Applicants: California Independent System Operator Corporation.
    Description: Tariff Amendment: 2017-12-08 Amendment to Filing CAISO
BC Hydro Data Sharing Agreement to be effective 2/15/2018.
    Filed Date: 12/8/17.
    Accession Number: 20171208-5133.
    Comments Due: 5 p.m. ET 12/29/17.

    Docket Numbers: ER18-251-006.
    Applicants: California Independent System Operator Corporation.
    Description: Tariff Amendment: 2017-12-11 Amendment to Pending
Filing BC Hydro Data Sharing Agreement to be effective 2/15/2018.
    Filed Date: 12/11/17.
    Accession Number: 20171211-5057.
    Comments Due: 5 p.m. ET 1/2/18.

    Docket Numbers: ER18-283-000.
    Applicants: EUI Affiliate LLC.
    Description: Supplement to November 13, 2017 EUI Affiliate LLC
tariff filing (Notice of Non-Material Change in Status).
    Filed Date: 12/11/17.
    Accession Number: 20171211-5126.
    Comments Due: 5 p.m. ET 1/2/18.

    Docket Numbers: ER18-418-000.
    Applicants: EGP Stillwater Solar, LLC.
    Description: Sec.  205(d) Rate Filing: EGP Stillwater Solar, LLC
SFA to be effective 11/16/2017.
    Filed Date: 12/11/17.
    Accession Number: 20171211-5000.
    Comments Due: 5 p.m. ET 1/2/18.

    Docket Numbers: ER18-419-000.
    Applicants: EGP Stillwater Solar PV II, LLC.
    Description: Sec.  205(d) Rate Filing: EGP Stillwater Solar PV II,
LLC SFA to be effective 11/16/2017.

    Filed Date: 12/11/17.
    Accession Number: 20171211-5001.
    Comments Due: 5 p.m. ET 1/2/18.

    Docket Numbers: ER18-420-000.
    Applicants: Midcontinent Independent System Operator, Inc.
    Description: Sec.  205(d) Rate Filing: 2017-12-11_Termination of SA
2673_Odell Wind_NSP E&P Agreement to be effective 12/12/2017.
    Filed Date: 12/11/17.
    Accession Number: 20171211-5031.
    Comments Due: 5 p.m. ET 1/2/18.

    Docket Numbers: ER18-421-000.
    Applicants: Southwest Power Pool, Inc.
    Description: Petition for Waiver of Tariff Provisions of Southwest
Power Pool, Inc.
    Filed Date: 12/8/17.
    Accession Number: 20171208-5172.
    Comments Due: 5 p.m. ET 12/29/17.

    Docket Numbers: ER18-422-000.
    Applicants: PJM Interconnection, L.L.C.
    Description: Sec.  205(d) Rate Filing: Amendment to Service
Agreement Nos. 3071 and 3072, Queue Nos. U1-059/W1-056 to be effective
8/30/2011.
    Filed Date: 12/11/17.
    Accession Number: 20171211-5045.
    Comments Due: 5 p.m. ET 1/2/18.

    Docket Numbers: ER18-423-000.
    Applicants: Pacific Gas and Electric Company.
    Description: Sec.  205(d) Rate Filing: SVP Work Performance
Agreement for NRS Breaker Replacement (SA 343) to be effective 12/12/
2017.
    Filed Date: 12/11/17.
    Accession Number: 20171211-5136.
    Comments Due: 5 p.m. ET 1/2/18.

    Docket Numbers: ER18-424-000.
    Applicants: NSTAR Electric Company.
    Description: Sec.  205(d) Rate Filing: Covanta SEMASS IA to be
effective 12/1/2017.
    Filed Date: 12/11/17.
    Accession Number: 20171211-5143.
    Comments Due: 5 p.m. ET 1/2/18.

    Take notice that the Commission received the following electric
securities filings:

    Docket Numbers: ES18-17-000.
    Applicants: KCP&L Greater Missouri Operations Company.
    Description: Application for Authorization of Issuance of Short-
Term Debt Securities Under Section 204 of the Federal Power Act of
KCP&L Greater Missouri Operations Company.
    Filed Date: 12/11/17.
    Accession Number: 20171211-5128.
    Comments Due: 5 p.m. ET 1/2/18.

    The filings are accessible in the Commission's eLibrary system by
clicking on the links or querying the docket number.
    Any person desiring to intervene or protest in any of the above
proceedings must file in accordance with Rules 211 and 214 of the
Commission's Regulations (18 CFR 385.211 and 385.214) on or before 5:00
p.m. Eastern time on the specified comment date. Protests may be
considered, but intervention is necessary to become a party to the
proceeding.
    eFiling is encouraged. More detailed information relating to filing
requirements, interventions, protests, service, and qualifying
facilities filings can be found at: http://www.ferc.gov/docs-filing/efiling/filing-req.pdf. For other information, call<PHONE_NUMBER>
(toll free). For TTY, call<PHONE_NUMBER>.

    Dated: December 11, 2017.
Kimberly D. Bose,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2017-27175 Filed 12-15-17; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6717-01-P