http://coalgasificationnews.com/tag/conocophillips/
--
--
We Energies Pleasant Prairie Field Pilot
http://www.power.alstom.com/home/about_us/strategy/clean_power_today/carbon_capture_storage_ccs/pilots_and_demonstrations/50484.EN.php
http://sequestration.mit.edu/tools/projects/pleasant_prairie.html
--
American Electric Power - Great Bend IGCC
http://www.sourcewatch.org/index.php?title=Great_Bend_IGCC

http://www.mydailysentinel.com/pages/full_story?page_label=home_top_stories_news&article-AEP-Clean-coal-plant-on-hold%20=&id=1913848-AEP-Clean-coal-plant-on-hold&widget=push&instance=secondary_news_left_column&open=&
--
--
Taylorville Energy Center
http://www.cleancoalillinois.com/tec.html
--
--
CCS Project - Coffeyville
http://www.cvrenergy.com/NitrogenFertilizerOperations/index.html
http://www.globalccsinstitute.com/projects/12441
--
Edison Mission Group
http://www.edison.com/ourcompany/emg.asp?id=1608
http://www.edison.com/ourcompany/emg.asp?id=1608
--
American Electric Power - Red Rock Facility
http://www.aep.com/newsroom/newsreleases/?id=1396
--
--
NRG Energy Inc. (Somerset Plant)
http://www.clf.org/newsroom/somerset-station-coal-plant-shuts-down-permanently-ending-pollution-legacy-in-somerset/
--
--
Air Products and Chemicals Inc. CCS Project
http://www.fossil.energy.gov/recovery/projects/industrial_ccs.html
http://www.netl.doe.gov/publications/factsheets/project/FE0002381.pdf

http://www.fe.doe.gov/news/techlines/2010/10017-DOE_Selects_Industrial_CCS_Project.html
http://www.netl.doe.gov/publications/factsheets/project/FE0002381.pdf
Alcoa Inc.
--
http://www.netl.doe.gov/publications/factsheets/project/FE0002415.pdf
--
Duke Energy - Edwardsport Plant
http://www.duke-energy.com/about-us/edwardsport-overview.asp

http://en3pro.com/wp-content/uploads/2011/04/CCS-fact-sheet.pdf
--
--
FutureGen 2.0 - Meredosia
http://www.futuregenalliance.org/pdf/FutureGenFacts.pdf
http://www.futuregenalliance.org/futuregen-2-0-project/

http://sequestration.mit.edu/tools/projects/futuregen.html
--
Great Plains Synfuels Plant
http://www.zeroco2.no/projects/the-great-plains-synfuels-plant
http://www.netl.doe.gov/technologies/carbon_seq/FAQs/carboncapture2.html
--
Hydrogen Energy California Project
http://sequestration.mit.edu/tools/projects/heca.html

http://www.netl.doe.gov/publications/factsheets/project/FE0000663.pdf
http://sequestration.mit.edu/tools/projects/heca.html

http://sequestration.mit.edu/tools/projects/DOE%20projects/CCPI%20projects/HECA-Tech-Update-2011.pdf
http://sequestration.mit.edu/tools/projects/DOE%20projects/CCPI%20projects/HECA-Tech-Update-2011.pdf
Kemper County Project
http://www.mississippipower.com/kemper/home.asp

http://www.secarbon.org/wp-content/uploads/2012/09_Esposito.pdf
http://sequestration.mit.edu/tools/projects/kemper.html
--
La Veta NG Processing
http://www.ghgworks.com/3-what.html
http://www.netl.doe.gov/publications/proceedings/07/rcsp/factsheets/2-SWP_Deep%20Saline%20Deployment%20Project.pdf
--
Leucadia Energy Capture Project - Louisiana
http://www.fossil.energy.gov/recovery/projects/industrial_ccs.html
http://www.netl.doe.gov/publications/proceedings/10/co2capture/presentations/thursday/Doug%20Cathro%20-%20FE0002314.pdf
http://www.netl.doe.gov/publications/proceedings/10/co2capture/presentations/thursday/Doug%20Cathro%20-%20FE0002314.pdf
MGSC Large-Volume Sequestration Test:  Ethanol Plant Source
http://www.netl.doe.gov/publications/factsheets/project/NT42588.pdf

http://sequestration.org/mgscprojects/deepsalinestorage.html

http://sequestration.mit.edu/tools/projects/decatur.html

http://www.netl.doe.gov/publications/factsheets/project/Project678_4P.pdf

http://www.netl.doe.gov/publications/proceedings/07/rcsp/factsheets/4-MGSC_Large-Volume%20Sequestration%20Test%20with%20Ethanol%20Plant%20So.pdf
http://globalenergyobservatory.org/geoid/40262
http://www.netl.doe.gov/publications/factsheets/project/NT42588.pdf
MRCSP Michigan Basin Geologic Test and Large-Volume Injection:  Otsego County, MI
http://<IP_ADDRESS>/MichiganBasin_validation.aspx

http://www.netl.doe.gov/publications/factsheets/project/Project686_8P.pdf
http://www.netl.doe.gov/technologies/carbon_seq/FAQs/carboncapture2.html

http://www.netl.doe.gov/publications/factsheets/project/Project686_8P.pdf
http://<IP_ADDRESS>/userdata/Fact%20Sheets/Michigan.pdf
NRG Energy Inc. (W.A. Parish Plant)
http://www.netl.doe.gov/publications/factsheets/project/FE0003311.pdf
http://sequestration.mit.edu/tools/projects/wa_parish.html
http://sequestration.mit.edu/tools/projects/DOE%20projects/CCPI%20projects/WA-PArish-Tech-Update-2011pdf.pdf
PCOR Bell Creek Demonstration Project
http://www.netl.doe.gov/publications/factsheets/project/Project679_4P.pdf
http://www.netl.doe.gov/publications/factsheets/project/Project679_4P.pdf
http://www.netl.doe.gov/publications/factsheets/project/Project679_4P.pdf
Pecos County, Texas - Gas Processing
http://www.sandridgeenergy.com/AboutSandRidge/CenturyPlant/tabid/125/Default.aspx
--
--
Polk Station Carbon Dioxide Capture and Storage Project
http://www.tampaelectric.com/news/article/index.cfm?article=541

http://www.netl.doe.gov/publications/proceedings/02/Hybrid/Hybrid2Hornick.PDF
http://www.netl.doe.gov/technologies/coalpower/gasification/projects/gas-clean/00489/19HORNICK.pdf

http://sequestration.mit.edu/tools/projects/polk.html
http://www.netl.doe.gov/technologies/coalpower/gasification/projects/gas-clean/00489/19HORNICK.pdf
Purdy, Sho-Vel-Tum EOR Project
http://globalenergyobservatory.org/geoid/40281

http://www.netl.doe.gov/KMD/cds/disk22/F-ARI%20Basin%20Oriented%20Strategies%20for%20CO2/oklahoma_report.pdf
http://www.globalccsinstitute.com/projects/12561

http://www.zeroco2.no/projects/enid-fertiliser-plant

http://www.sourcewatch.org/index.php?title=Enid_Fertilizer
--
Searles Valley Minerals
http://mydocs.epri.com/docs/public/000000000001014698.pdf
http://www.netl.doe.gov/technologies/carbon_seq/FAQs/carboncapture2.html

http://my.epri.com/portal/server.pt?space=CommunityPage&cached=true&parentname=ObjMgr&parentid=2&control=SetCommunity&CommunityID=405
--
SECARB Anthropogenic Test and Stage 1
http://www.netl.doe.gov/publications/factsheets/project/NT42590.pdf

http://www.alabamapower.com/about/plants.asp

http://www.netl.doe.gov/publications/factsheets/project/Project680_4P.pdf
http://www.netl.doe.gov/publications/factsheets/project/NT42590.pdf

http://www.secarbon.org/files/anthropogenic-test.pdf

http://sequestration.mit.edu/tools/projects/plant_barry.html
http://www.netl.doe.gov/publications/factsheets/project/NT42590.pdf

http://www.southerncompany.com/planetpower/demonstration_carboncapture.aspx

http://www.netl.doe.gov/publications/proceedings/11/carbon_storage/tuesday/SECARB_Hill_RCSP-InfrastructureMtg_PIT%20%287%29%2011-15-11.pdf
Shell Chemical CCS Project
--
--
--
Shute Creek Plant
http://www.wyomingcarbonstorage.com/ccsrm/eor-projects-wyoming/shutecreek
http://www.netl.doe.gov/technologies/carbon_seq/FAQs/carboncapture2.html

http://www.nist.gov/pml/high_megawatt/upload/2_3-Kubek-Approved.pdf

http://www.seminole-electric.com/about_us.php

http://www.ogj.com/articles/2010/12/exxonmobil-finishes.html

http://www.exxonmobil.com/Corporate/Files/news_pub_Carbon_Capture_Storage_brochure.pdf
http://www.nist.gov/pml/high_megawatt/upload/2_3-Kubek-Approved.pdf
Summit Energy - Texas Clean Energy Project (TCEP)
http://www.netl.doe.gov/publications/factsheets/project/FE0002650.pdf
http://sequestration.mit.edu/tools/projects/DOE%20projects/CCPI%20projects/TCEP-Tech-Update-2011.pdf

http://www.netl.doe.gov/publications/factsheets/project/FE0002650.pdf
http://www.netl.doe.gov/publications/factsheets/project/FE0002650.pdf

http://www.texascleanenergyproject.com/project/
The Erora Group - Cash Creek IGCC
http://www.erora.com/

http://www.globalccsinstitute.com/projects/12626

http://www.sourcewatch.org/index.php?title=Cash_Creek_Generation
http://www.globalccsinstitute.com/projects/12626
--
Trailblazer Energy Center
http://www.tenaskatrailblazer.com/
http://cdn.globalccsinstitute.com/sites/default/files/publications/32321/traiblazer-front-end-engineering-and-design-study-report-final.pdf
http://cdn.globalccsinstitute.com/sites/default/files/publications/32321/traiblazer-front-end-engineering-and-design-study-report-final.pdf
Val Verde NG Plants
http://www.thefreelibrary.com/Val+Verde+CO2+Pipeline+Completes+Construction+and+Begins+Operations-a053019153

http://www.ghgworks.com/4c-valverde.html
http://www.netl.doe.gov/technologies/carbon_seq/FAQs/carboncapture2.html
--
Antelope Valley Carbon Dioxide Capture and Storage Project
http://sequestration.mit.edu/tools/projects/antelope_valley.html
--
--
American Electric Power - Mountaineer
http://www.aep.com/environmental/climatechange/carboncapture/
http://sequestration.mit.edu/tools/projects/aep_alstom_mountaineer.html
http://www.aep.com/environmental/climatechange/carboncapture/
Carbon Dioxide Technology Corp - Lubboch Plant
--
http://services.bepress.com/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1006&context=eci/separations_technology_vi
--
ECO2 Burger
http://<IP_ADDRESS>/AppalachianBasin.aspx

http://www.carboncapturejournal.com/displaynews.php?NewsID=735
http://sequestration.mit.edu/tools/projects/berger.html

http://powerspan.com/technology/eco2-co2-capture/

http://powerspan.com/wp-content/themes/simplo/site-images/Powerspan_Integrated_ECO-SO2-ECO2_Process_Flow.pdf
--
Mitchell Energy Bridgeport Plant
http://www.worleyparsons.com/CSG/Hydrocarbons/SpecialtyCapabilities/Documents/Carbon%20Capture%20Overview.pdf
http://sequestration.mit.edu/pdf/introduction_to_capture.pdf

http://www.worleyparsons.com/CSG/Hydrocarbons/SpecialtyCapabilities/Documents/Carbon%20Capture%20Overview%20%283%29.pdf
--
American Electric Power - Northeastern Station
http://www.prnewswire.com/news-releases/aep-to-install-carbon-capture-on-two-existing-power-plants-company-will-be-first-to-move-technology-to-commercial-scale-52165432.html
http://www.carboncapturejournal.com/displaynews.php?NewsID=91

http://www.zeroco2.no/projects/aep-northeastern
--
Wallula Energy Resource Center (WERC)
http://www.wallulaenergy.com/index.tpl?dsp=what
--
--
WESTCARB Kimberlina Test Facility
http://www.netl.doe.gov/publications/proceedings/08/rcsp/factsheets/22-WESTCARB_Large%20Volume%20Sequestration%20Test_PhIII.pdf
--
http://www.netl.doe.gov/publications/proceedings/08/rcsp/factsheets/22-WESTCARB_Large%20Volume%20Sequestration%20Test_PhIII.pdf
Coal Plant Outside NY City
http://www.nytimes.com/2009/04/18/business/energy-environment/18clean.html?_r=2
--
--
Great Lakes Energy Research Park
http://www.mandmenergy.com/index-2.html

http://www.mandmenergy.com/documents/morningsun_energypark_122007.pdf
http://www.mandmenergy.com/documents/GVSU_GLERP_final_042408.pdf
--
Kentucky NewGas
--
http://www.globalccsinstitute.com/projects/22957
--
Leucadia - Indiana
http://www.cbsnews.com/8301-505244_162-57430964/idem-files-proposed-permit-for-gasification-plant/
http://www.energy.utah.gov/media/energysummit/docs/2012/Mar/Ben.pdf
--
Lima Polygen
--
--
--
Project Viking
http://www.co2.no/default.asp?uid=157&CID=157

http://www.sourcewatch.org/index.php?title=Project_Viking
http://www.co2.no/default.asp?uid=157&CID=157
--
Waste Management & Processors PTY., LLC
http://www.hydrocarbons-technology.com/projects/co_production/

http://www.netl.doe.gov/technologies/coalpower/turbines/refshelf/reports/41776%20GE%20Semi-Annual_Fuel%20Flexible%20Combustion.PDF
--
--
ZENG Worsham-Steed
http://www.cleanenergysystems.com/
http://www.co2.no/download.asp?DAFID=34&DAAID=3

http://sequestration.mit.edu/tools/projects/worsham_steed.html
http://sequestration.mit.edu/tools/projects/worsham_steed.html

http://www.co2.no/download.asp?DAFID=34&DAAID=3
--
C6 Resources CCS Project
http://www.fossil.energy.gov/recovery/projects/industrial_ccs.html
--
--
CEMEX Inc. Cement CO2 Capture Project
http://www.fossil.energy.gov/recovery/projects/industrial_ccs.html
--
--
FutureGen - Jewett
http://www.futuregenalliance.org/
--
--
FutureGen - Mattoon
http://www.futuregenalliance.org/
--
--
FutureGen - Odessa
http://www.futuregenalliance.org/
--
--
FutureGen - Tuscola
http://www.futuregenalliance.org/
--
--
Jamestown BPU
http://www.sourcewatch.org/index.php?title=Clean_Coal_Plant_Project_(Jamestown%2C_New_York)
--
--
Leucadia Energy Capture Project - Mississippi
http://www.fossil.energy.gov/recovery/projects/industrial_ccs.html
--
--
Leucadia- Mississippi Gasification
--
http://blog.al.com/live/2009/11/public_meeting_set_on_proposed.html
http://www.energy.utah.gov/media/energysummit/docs/2012/Mar/Ben.pdf

http://blog.gulflive.com/mississippi-press-news/2011/11/gasification_project_leaders_r.html
--
Lockwood Gasification Plant
--
--
--
NRG Energy Inc - Huntley IGCC Project
http://www.snl.com/irweblinkx/file.aspx?IID=4057436&FID=3211361
--
--
Praxair Inc. CO2 Capture and Sequestration Project
http://www.fossil.energy.gov/recovery/projects/industrial_ccs.html
--
--
Wolverine Power Supply Cooperative Inc. - Industrial Capture Project
http://www.fossil.energy.gov/recovery/projects/industrial_ccs.html
--
--
Xcel Energy Inc.
http://www.redorbit.com/news/business/1128394/xcel_cancels_bent_county_power_plant/

http://www.sourcewatch.org/index.php?title=Unnamed_Xcel_Energy_Plant
--
--


[Federal Register Volume 87, Number 36 (Wednesday, February 23, 2022)]
[Notices]
[Pages 10191-10192]
[FR Doc No: 2022-03803]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission

[Docket No. RM98-1-000]

Records Governing Off-the-Record Communications; Public Notice

    This constitutes notice, in accordance with 18 CFR 385.2201(b), of
the receipt of prohibited and exempt off-the-record communications.
    Order No. 607 (64 FR 51222, September 22, 1999) requires Commission
decisional employees, who make or receive a prohibited or exempt off-
the-record communication relevant to the merits of a contested
proceeding, to deliver to the Secretary of the Commission, a copy of
the communication, if written, or a summary of the substance of any
oral communication.
    Prohibited communications are included in a public, non-decisional
file associated with, but not a part of, the decisional record of the
proceeding. Unless the Commission determines that the prohibited
communication and any responses thereto should become a part of the
decisional record, the prohibited off-the-record communication will not
be considered by the Commission in reaching its decision. Parties to a
proceeding may seek the opportunity to respond to any facts or
contentions made in a prohibited off-the-record communication and may
request that the Commission place the prohibited communication and
responses thereto in the decisional record. The Commission will grant
such a request only when it determines that fairness so requires. Any
person identified below as having made a prohibited off-the-record
communication shall serve the document on all parties listed on the
official service list for the applicable proceeding in accordance with
Rule 2010, 18 CFR 385.2010.
    Exempt off-the-record communications are included in the decisional
record of the proceeding, unless the communication was with a
cooperating agency as described by 40 CFR 1501.6, made under 18 CFR
385.2201(e)(1)(v).
    The following is a list of off-the-record communications recently
received by the Secretary of the Commission. The communications listed
are grouped by docket numbers in ascending order. These filings are
available for electronic review at the Commission in the Public
Reference Room or may be viewed on the Commission's website at http://www.ferc.gov using the eLibrary link. Enter the docket number,
excluding the last three digits, in the docket number field to access
the document. For assistance, please contact FERC Online Support at
[email protected] or toll free at<PHONE_NUMBER>, or for TTY,
contact<PHONE_NUMBER>.

------------------------------------------------------------------------
                                                        Presenter or
            Docket Nos.                File date          requester
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Prohibited:
    1. CP16-9-011, CP16-9-012.....        2-1-2022  FERC Staff.\1\
    2. CP16-9-011, CP16-9-012,            2-1-2022  FERC Staff.\2\
     RP21-1001-000, RP21-1001-001,
     CP18-46-004, CP15-490-002.
    3. CP16-9-011, CP16-9-012,            2-1-2022  FERC Staff.\3\
     RP21-1001-000, RP21-1001-001,
     CP18-46-004, CP15-490-002.
    4. CP16-9-011, CP16-9-012.....        2-1-2022  FERC Staff.\4\
    5. CP16-9-011, CP16-9-012.....        2-1-2022  FERC Staff.\5\
    6. CP21-57-000................       2-14-2022  FERC Staff.\6\
    7. CP21-57-000................       2-14-2022  FERC Staff.\7\
    8. CP21-57-00.................       2-14-2022  FERC Staff.\8\
    9. CP21-57-000................       2-14-2022  FERC Staff.\9\
    10. CP21-57-000...............       2-14-2022  FERC Staff.\10\
    11. CP21-57-000...............       2-14-2022  FERC Staff.\11\
    12. CP21-57-000...............       2-14-2022  FERC Staff.\12\
    13. CP21-57-000...............       2-14-2022  FERC Staff.\13\
    14. CP21-57-000...............       2-14-2022  FERC Staff.\14\
    15. CP21-57-000...............       2-14-2022  FERC Staff.\15\
    16. CP21-57-000...............       2-14-2022  FERC Staff.\16\
    17. CP21-57-000...............       2-14-2022  FERC Staff.\17\
    18. CP21-57-000...............       2-14-2022  FERC Staff.\18\
    19. CP21-57-000...............       2-14-2022  FERC Staff.\19\
    20. CP21-57-000...............       2-14-2022  FERC Staff.\20\
    21. CP21-57-000...............       2-14-2022  FERC Staff.\21\
    22. CP21-57-000...............       2-14-2022  FERC Staff.\22\
    23. CP21-57-000...............       2-14-2022  FERC Staff.\23\
    24. CP21-57-000...............       2-14-2022  FERC Staff.\24\

    25. CP21-57-000...............       2-14-2022  FERC Staff.\25\
    26. CP21-57-000...............       2-14-2022  FERC Staff.\26\
    27. CP21-57-000...............       2-14-2022  FERC Staff.\27\
    28. CP21-57-000...............       2-14-2022  FERC Staff.\28\
    29. CP21-57-000...............       2-14-2022  FERC Staff.\29\
    30. CP21-57-000...............       2-14-2022  FERC Staff.\30\
    31. CP21-57-000...............       2-14-2022  FERC Staff.\31\
    32. CP21-57-000...............       2-14-2022  FERC Staff.\32\
    33. CP21-57-000...............       2-14-2022  FERC Staff.\33\
    34. CP21-57-000...............       2-14-2022  FERC Staff.\34\
    35. CP21-57-000...............       2-15-2022  FERC Staff.\35\
    36. CP21-57-000...............       2-15-2022  FERC Staff.\36\
Exempt:
    P-2146-111, P-82-000, P-618-          2-2-2022  U.S Fish and
     000.                                            Wildlife Service.
------------------------------------------------------------------------
\1\ Emailed comments dated 1/19/2022 from Dorothy Anderson and 5 other
  individuals.
\2\ Emailed comments dated 1/19/2022 from Gabbie McFrane and 22 other
  individuals.
\3\ Emailed comments dated 1/20/2022 from Cory Alperstein.
\4\ Emailed comments dated 1/20/2022 from Virginia Marcotte.
\5\ Emailed comments dated 1/21/2022 from Molly Smith.
\6\ Emailed comments dated 2/14/2022 from Don Worley.
\7\ Emailed comments dated 2/14/2022 from Eugenie A Jenkins.
\8\ Emailed comments dated 2/14/2022 from Elizabeth Struthers Malbon,
  Ph.D.
\9\ Emailed comments dated 2/14/2022 from Elizabeth Watts.
\10\ Emailed comments dated 2/14/2022 from James O. Michel.
\11\ Emailed comments dated 2/14/2022 from Laurence Kirby.
\12\ Emailed comments dated 2/14/2022 from Sharon Davlin.
\13\ Emailed comments dated 2/14/2022 from Donna Cubit-Swoyer.
\14\ Emailed comments dated 2/14/2022 from L.M. Hussenbux.
\15\ Emailed comments dated 2/14/2022 from Don Worley.
\16\ Emailed comments dated 2/14/2022 from Eugenie A. Jenkins.
\17\ Emailed comments dated 2/14/2022 from Elizabeth Struthers Malbon,
  Ph.D.
\18\ Emailed comments dated 2/14/2022 from Elizabeth Watts.
\19\ Emailed comments dated 2/14/2022 from Laurence Kirby.
\20\ Emailed comments dated 2/14/2022 from Donna Cubit-Swoyer.
\21\ Emailed comments dated 2/14/2022 from L.M. Hussenbux.
\22\ Emailed comments dated 2/14/2022 from Sharon Davlin.
\23\ Emailed comments dated 2/14/2022 from Lucy Duff.
\24\ Emailed comments dated 2/14/2022 from Stephen Weissman.
\25\ Emailed comments dated 2/14/2022 from Jennifer Valentine.
\26\ Emailed comments dated 2/14/2022 from Sally Small.
\27\ Emailed comments dated 2/14/2022 from V Ra.
\28\ Emailed comments dated 2/14/2022 from Kathryn Summers.
\29\ Emailed comments dated 2/14/2022 from Sandra Couch.
\30\ Emailed comments dated 2/14/2022 from Yvonne Rocco.
\31\ Emailed comments dated 2/14/2022 from Daniel Lawrence.
\32\ Emailed comments dated 2/14/2022 from Carol Joan Patterson.
\33\ Emailed comments dated 2/14/2022 from Colleen Wysser-Martin.
\34\ Emailed comments dated 2/14/2022 from Sid Madison.
\35\ Emailed comments dated 2/14/2022 from Rory Page.
\36\ Emailed comments dated 2/14/2022 from Daniel Dayton.

    Dated: February 16, 2022.
Debbie-Anne A. Reese,
Deputy Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2022-03803 Filed 2-22-22; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6717-01-P


[Federal Register Volume 87, Number 149 (Thursday, August 4, 2022)]
[Notices]
[Pages 47744-47748]
[FR Doc No: 2022-16646]

=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY

[EPA-HQ-OPP-2022-0624; FRL-10087-01-OCSPP]

Pesticide Emergency Exemptions; Agency Decisions and State and
Federal Agency Crisis Declarations

AGENCY: Environmental Protection Agency (EPA).

ACTION: Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: EPA has granted emergency exemptions under the Federal
Insecticide, Fungicide, and Rodenticide Act (FIFRA) for use of
pesticides as listed in this notice. The exemptions were granted during
the period July 1, 2021, to June 30, 2022, to control unforeseen pest
outbreaks.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Marietta Echeverria, Registration
Division (7505T), Office of Pesticide Programs, Environmental
Protection Agency, 1200 Pennsylvania Ave. NW, Washington, DC 20460-
0001; main telephone number:<PHONE_NUMBER>; email address:
[email protected].

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

I. General Information

A. Does this action apply to me?

    You may be potentially affected by this action if you are an
agricultural producer, food manufacturer, or pesticide manufacturer.
The following list of North American Industrial Classification System
(NAICS) codes is not intended to be exhaustive, but rather provides a
guide to help readers determine whether this document applies to them.
Potentially affected entities may include:
     Crop production (NAICS code 111).
     Animal production (NAICS code 112).
     Food manufacturing (NAICS code 311).
     Pesticide manufacturing (NAICS code 32532).
    If you have any questions regarding the applicability of this
action to a particular entity, consult the person listed at the end of
the emergency exemption.

B. How can I get copies of this document and other related information?

    The docket for this action, identified by docket identification
(ID) number EPA-HQ-OPP-2022-0624, is available at https://www.regulations.gov or at the Office of Pesticide Programs Regulatory
Public Docket (OPP Docket) in the Environmental Protection Agency
Docket Center (EPA/DC), West William Jefferson Clinton Bldg., Rm. 3334,
1301 Constitution Ave. NW, Washington, DC 20460-0001. The Public
Reading Room is open from 8:30 a.m. to 4:30 p.m., Monday through
Friday, excluding legal holidays. The telephone number for the Public
Reading Room and the OPP Docket is<PHONE_NUMBER>. Please review the
visitor instructions and additional information about the docket
available at https://www.epa.gov/dockets.

II. Background

    EPA has granted emergency exemptions to the following State and
Federal agencies. The emergency exemptions may take the following form:
Crisis, public health, quarantine, or specific.
    Under FIFRA section 18 (7 U.S.C. 136p), EPA can authorize the use
of a pesticide when emergency conditions exist. Authorizations
(commonly called emergency exemptions) are granted to State and Federal
agencies and are of four types:
    1. A ``specific exemption'' authorizes use of a pesticide against
specific pests for a specific crop/site on a limited acreage, or other
unit for treatment (e.g., square footage, cartons of produce in a
particular State. Most emergency exemptions are specific exemptions.
    2. ``Quarantine'' and ``public health'' exemptions are emergency
exemptions issued for quarantine or public health purposes. These are
requested less frequently than specific exemptions.
    3. A ``crisis exemption'' is initiated by a State or Federal agency
(and is concurred upon by EPA) when there is insufficient time to
request and obtain EPA permission for emergency use of a pesticide
under one of the other types of emergency exemptions.
    EPA may deny an emergency exemption request: If the State or
Federal agency cannot demonstrate that an emergency exists, if the use
poses unacceptable risks to the environment, or if EPA cannot reach a
conclusion that the proposed pesticide use is likely to result in ``a
reasonable certainty of no harm'' to human health, including exposure
of infants and children to residues of the pesticide.
    If the emergency use of the pesticide on a food or feed commodity
would result in pesticide chemical residues, EPA establishes a time-
limited tolerance meeting the ``reasonable certainty of no harm
standard'' of the Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act (FFDCA).
    In this document: EPA identifies the State or Federal agency
granted the exemption, the type of exemption, the pesticide authorized,
the pests, the crop or use for which authorized, number of acres or
other unit for treatment (if applicable), and the effective date of the
exemption. EPA also gives the Federal Register citation for the time-
limited tolerance, if any, and notes when a Notice of Receipt (if
required under 40 CFR 166.24) was published in the Federal Register.

III. Emergency Exemptions

A. U.S. States and Territories

Alabama
Department of Agriculture and Industries
    Specific exemption: EPA authorized the use of fluridone on a
maximum of 10,000 acres of peanut to control herbicide-resistant Palmer
amaranth. Time-limited tolerances in connection with a previous action
support this emergency use and are established in 40 CFR 180.420(b).
The authorization was effective April 15, 2022.
Arkansas
Department of Agriculture
    Crisis exemptions: EPA concurred upon a crisis exemption declared
by the Arkansas Department of Agriculture for the use of
methoxyfenozide to control fall armyworm in rice. Time-limited
tolerances in connection with a previous action support this use and
are established in 40 CFR 180.544(b). The crisis exemption was
effective July 28, 2021.
    EPA concurred upon a crisis exemption declared by the Arkansas
Department of Agriculture for the use of thiamethoxam to control severe
infestations of rice stinkbug. Time-limited tolerances in connection
with a previous action support this use and are established in 40 CFR
180.565(b). The crisis exemption was effective August 13, 2021.
    Specific exemptions: EPA authorized the use of methoxyfenozide on a
maximum of 250,000 acres of rice to control fall armyworm. Time-limited
tolerances in connection with a previous action support this emergency
use and are established in 40 CFR 180.544(b). The authorization was
effective September 29, 2021.
    EPA authorized the use of thiamethoxam on a maximum of 300,000
acres of rice to control rice stink bug. Time-limited tolerances in
connection with a previous action support this emergency use and are
established in 40 CFR 180.565(b). The authorization was effective
October 15, 2021.
    EPA authorized the use of fluridone on a maximum of 5,000 acres of
peanut to control herbicide-resistant Palmer amaranth. Time-limited
tolerances in connection with a previous action support this emergency
use and are established in 40 CFR 180.420(b). The authorization was
effective April 15, 2022.

California
Department of Pesticide Regulation
    Specific exemptions: EPA authorized the use of kasugamycin on a
maximum of 100,000 acres of almond trees to control bacterial blast.
Time-limited tolerances in connection with a previous action support
this emergency use and are established in 40 CFR 180.614(b). The
authorization was effective February 1, 2022.
    EPA authorized the use of methoxyfenozide on a maximum of 102,000
acres of rice to control armyworm and Western Yellowstriped Armyworm.
Time-limited tolerances in connection with a previous action support
this emergency use and are established in 40 CFR 180.544(b). The
authorization was effective May 1, 2022.
Georgia
Department of Agriculture
    Public Health Exemption: EPA authorized the use of triethylene
glycol formulated as Grignard Pure, an unregistered product for air
treatment in indoor spaces, (occupied and unoccupied) to help control
the spread of Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome Coronavirus 2 or SARS-
CoV-2. The authorization was effective February 15, 2022.
Hawaii
Department of Agriculture
    Specific exemption: EPA authorized the use of fluxapyroxad and
pyraclostrobin (co-formulated in PriaxorTM Xemium[supreg]
Brand Fungicide) on a maximum of 8,000 acres of coffee to control
coffee leaf rust. Import tolerances in connection with prior
registration actions are established in 40 CFR 180.166 for fluxapyroxad
and 40 CFR 180.582 for pyraclostrobin and are sufficient to support
this use. The authorization was effective May 19, 2022.
Louisiana
Department of Agriculture and Forestry
    Specific exemption: EPA authorized the use of triclopyr on a
maximum of 450,000 acres of sugarcane to control divine nightshade. A
time-limited tolerance in connection with a previous action supports
this emergency use and is established in 40 CFR 180.417(b). The
authorization was effective October 1, 2021.
Maryland
Department of Agriculture
    Public Health Exemptions: EPA authorized the use of triethylene
glycol formulated as Grignard Pure, an unregistered product for air
treatment in indoor spaces, (occupied and unoccupied) to help control
the spread of Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome Coronavirus 2 or SARS-
CoV-2. The authorization was effective July 1, 2021.
    EPA authorized the use of triethylene glycol formulated as Grignard
Pure, an unregistered product for air treatment in indoor spaces,
(occupied and unoccupied) to help control the spread of Severe Acute
Respiratory Syndrome Coronavirus 2 or SARS-CoV-2. The authorization was
effective February 15, 2022.
    Specific Exemption: EPA authorized the use of bifenthrin on a
maximum of 3,570 acres of apples, nectarines and peaches to control
brown marmorated stinkbug. Time-limited tolerances in connection with
previous actions supported this emergency use and were established in
40 CFR 180.442(b). Permanent tolerances have since been established for
these commodities at 40 CFR 180.442(a). The authorization was effective
August 5, 2021.
Massachusetts
Department of Agriculture and Resource
    Specific exemption: EPA authorized the use of propyzamide on a
maximum of 5,000 acres of cranberries to control dodder. A time-limited
tolerance in connection with a previous action supports this emergency
use and is established in 40 CFR 180.317(b). The authorization was
effective March 4, 2022.
Michigan
Department of Agriculture and Rural Development
    Specific Exemption: EPA authorized the use of acifluorfen on a
maximum of 48,000 acres of sugar beets for postemergence control of
invasive Amaranthus (pigweed) spp., waterhemp, and Palmer amaranth.
Time-limited tolerances in connection with a previous action support
this emergency use and are established in 40 CFR 180.383(b). The
authorization was effective April 28, 2022.
    Quarantine Exemption: EPA authorized the use of imidacloprid on a
maximum of 1,566 acres of Eastern Hemlock trees to control Hemlock
Wooly Adelgid. The authorization was effective August 12, 2021.
Minnesota
Department of Agriculture
    Specific exemption: EPA authorized the use of acifluorfen on a
maximum of 96,000 acres of sugar beets for postemergence control of
glyphosate-resistant waterhemp. Time-limited tolerances in connection
with a previous action support this emergency use and are established
in 40 CFR 180.383(b). The authorization was effective May 16, 2022.
Mississippi
Department of Agriculture and Commerce
    Crisis exemption: EPA concurred upon a crisis exemption declared by
the Mississippi Department of Agriculture and Commerce for the use of
methoxyfenozide to control fall armyworm in rice. Time-limited
tolerances in connection with a previous action support this use and
are established in 40 CFR 180.544(b). The crisis exemption was
effective July 28, 2021.
    Specific exemptions: EPA authorized the use of methoxyfenozide on a
maximum of 60,000 acres of rice to fall armyworm. Time-limited
tolerances in connection with a previous action support this emergency
use and are established in 40 CFR 180.544(b). The authorization was
effective September 29, 2021.
    EPA authorized the use of fluridone on a maximum of 4,000 acres of
peanut to control herbicide-resistant Palmer amaranth. Time-limited
tolerances in connection with a previous action support this emergency
use and are established in 40 CFR 180.420(b). The authorization was
effective April 15, 2022.
Missouri
Department of Agriculture
    Specific exemption: EPA authorized the use of fluridone on a
maximum of 4,000 acres of peanut to control herbicide-resistant Palmer
amaranth. Time-limited tolerances in connection with a previous action
support this emergency use and are established in 40 CFR 180.420(b).
This authorization was effective April 15, 2022.
Nevada
Department of Agriculture
    Public Health Exemptions: EPA authorized the use of triethylene
glycol formulated as Grignard Pure, an unregistered product for air
treatment in indoor spaces, (occupied and unoccupied) to help control
the spread of Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome Coronavirus 2 or SARS-
CoV-2. The authorization was effective July 1, 2021.
    EPA authorized the use of triethylene glycol formulated as Grignard
Pure, an unregistered product for air treatment in indoor spaces,
(occupied and unoccupied) to help control the spread of Severe Acute
Respiratory Syndrome

Coronavirus 2 or SARS-CoV-2. The authorization was effective February
15, 2022.
New York
Department of Environmental Conservation
    Specific Exemption: EPA authorized the use of bifenthrin on a
maximum of 7,521 acres of apples, nectarines and peaches to control
brown marmorated stinkbug. Time-limited tolerances in connection with
previous actions supported this emergency use and were established in
40 CFR 180.442(b). Permanent tolerances have since been established for
these commodities at 40 CFR 180.442(a). The authorization was effective
August 5, 2021.
North Carolina
Department of Agriculture and Consumer Services
    Specific exemption: EPA authorized the postharvest use of
thiabendazole on a maximum of 95,000 acres of sweet potatoes to control
black rot. A time-limited tolerance in connection with a previous
action supported this emergency use and was established in 40 CFR
180.242(b). The authorization was effective July 2, 2021.
North Dakota
Department of Agriculture
    Specific exemption: EPA authorized the use of acifluorfen on a
maximum of 34,000 acres of sugar beets for postemergence control of
glyphosate resistant waterhemp. Time-limited tolerances in connection
with a previous action support this emergency use and are established
in 40 CFR 180.383(b). The authorization was effective May 16, 2022.
Pennsylvania
Department of Agriculture
    Public Health Exemptions: EPA authorized the use of triethylene
glycol formulated as Grignard Pure, an unregistered product for air
treatment in indoor spaces, (occupied and unoccupied) to help control
the spread of Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome Coronavirus 2 or SARS-
CoV-2. The authorization was effective July 1, 2021.
    EPA authorized the use of triethylene glycol formulated as Grignard
Pure, an unregistered product for air treatment in indoor spaces,
(occupied and unoccupied) to help control the spread of Severe Acute
Respiratory Syndrome Coronavirus 2 or SARS-CoV-2. The authorization was
effective January 14, 2022.
    Specific Exemption: EPA authorized the use of bifenthrin on a
maximum of 24,973 acres of apples, nectarines and peaches to control
the brown marmorated stinkbug. Time-limited tolerances in connection
with previous actions supported this emergency use and were established
in 40 CFR 180.442(b). Permanent tolerances have since been established
for these commodities at 40 CFR 180.442(a). The authorization was
effective August 5, 2021.
Tennessee
Department of Agriculture
    Public Health Exemption: EPA authorized the use of triethylene
glycol formulated as Grignard Pure, an unregistered product for air
treatment in indoor spaces, (occupied and unoccupied) to help control
the spread of Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome Coronavirus 2 or SARS-
CoV-2. The authorization was effective January 14, 2022.
Texas
Department of Agriculture
    Public Health Exemptions: EPA authorized the use of triethylene
glycol formulated as Grignard Pure, an unregistered product for air
treatment in indoor spaces, (occupied and unoccupied) to help control
the spread of Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome Coronavirus 2 or SARS-
CoV-2. The authorization was effective July 1, 2021.
    EPA authorized the use of triethylene glycol formulated as Grignard
Pure, an unregistered product for air treatment in indoor spaces,
(occupied and unoccupied) to help control the spread of Severe Acute
Respiratory Syndrome Coronavirus 2 or SARS-CoV-2. The authorization was
effective January 14, 2022.
Virginia
Department of Agriculture and Consumer Services
    Public Health Exemption: EPA authorized the use of triethylene
glycol formulated as Grignard Pure, an unregistered product for air
treatment in indoor spaces, (occupied and unoccupied) to help control
the spread of Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome Coronavirus 2 or SARS-
CoV-2. The authorization was effective January 14, 2022.
    Specific Exemption: EPA authorized the use of bifenthrin on a
maximum of 29,000 acres of apples, nectarines and peaches to control
the brown marmorated stinkbug. Time-limited tolerances in connection
with previous actions supported this emergency use and were established
in 40 CFR 180.442(b). Permanent tolerances have been established for
these commodities at 40 CFR 180.442(a). The authorization was effective
August 5, 2021.
West Virginia
Department of Agriculture
    Specific Exemption: EPA authorized the use of bifenthrin on a
maximum of 5,986 acres of apples, nectarines and peaches to control the
brown marmorated stinkbug. Time-limited tolerances in connection with
previous actions supported this emergency use and were established in
40 CFR 180.442(b). Permanent tolerances have since been established for
these commodities at 40 CFR 180.442(a). The authorization was effective
August 5, 2021.

B. Federal Departments and Agencies

United States Department of Agriculture
Animal and Plant Health Inspector Service
    Quarantine Exemptions: EPA authorized the use of sodium
hypochlorite on porous and nonporous surfaces to decontaminate from
viruses of foot and mouth disease, classical swine fever, and African
swine fever. The authorization was effective September 10, 2021.
    EPA authorized the use of sodium hydroxide on nonporous surfaces to
control prions. The authorization was effective September 24, 2021.
    EPA authorized the use of sodium hypochlorite on nonporous surfaces
to control prions. The authorization was effective September 24, 2021.
    EPA authorized the use of citric acid to treat for disinfection of
porous and nonporous surfaces contaminated with foot-and-mouth disease
virus, African swine fever virus, low pathogenic avian influenza virus,
and highly pathogenic avian flu influenza virus. The authorization was
effective March 2, 2022.
    EPA authorized the use of a mixture of potassium peroxymonosulfate
and propylene glycol for disinfection of nonporous surfaces associated
with poultry facilities infected with highly pathogenic avian influenza
virus. The authorization was effective March 23, 2022.
National Aeronautics and Space Administration
    Specific exemption: EPA authorized the use of ortho-phthaldehyde,
immobilized to a porous resin, to treat the International Space Station
internal active thermal control system (IATCS) coolant for control of
aerobic and microaerophilic water bacteria and unidentified gram-
negative rods. This

request was granted because, without this use, the ISS would have no
means to control organisms in the IATCS since there are no registered
alternatives available which meet the required criteria. The emergency
request proposed a use of a new (unregistered) chemical and in
accordance with the requirements at 40 CFR 166.24(a)(1), a notice of
receipt published in the Federal Register on September 15, 2021, to
allow a public comment period, which closed on September 30, 2021. The
authorization was effective October 7, 2021.

(Authority: 7 U.S.C. 136 et seq.)

    Dated: July 28, 2022.
Marietta Echeverria,
Acting Director, Registration Division, Office of Pesticide Programs.
[FR Doc. 2022-16646 Filed 8-3-22; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6560-50-P


[Federal Register: July 26, 2006 (Volume 71, Number 143)]
[Notices]
[Page 42432-42433]
[DOCID:fr26jy06-123]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

[Release No. 34-54180; File No. SR-NSX-2006-09]

Self-Regulatory Organizations; National Stock Exchange, Inc.;
Notice of Filing and Immediate Effectiveness of a Proposed Rule Change
and Amendment Nos. 1 and 2 Thereto to Amend Its Fee Schedule Contained
in Exchange Rule 11.10(A) to Include a Quotation Fee

July 20, 2006.
    Pursuant to Section 19(b)(1) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934
(``Act'') \1\ and Rule 19b-4 thereunder,\2\ notice is hereby given that
on July 3, 2006, the National Stock Exchange, Inc. (``NSX'' or
``Exchange'') filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission
(``Commission'') the proposed rule change as described in Items I, II,
and III below, which Items have been prepared by the Exchange. On July
19, 2006, NSX submitted Amendment No. 1 to the proposed rule change. On
July 20, 2006, NSX submitted Amendment No. 2 to the proposed rule
change. The Exchange has designated this proposal as one establishing
or changing a due, fee, or other charge applicable only to a member
imposed by the Exchange under Section 19(b)(3)(A)(ii) of the Act \3\
and Rule 19b-4(f)(2) thereunder,\4\ which renders the proposal
effective upon filing with the Commission. The Commission is publishing
this notice to solicit comments on the proposed rule change, as
amended, from interested persons.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \1\ 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(1).
    \2\ 17 CFR 240.19b-4.
    \3\ 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(3)(A)(ii).
    \4\ 17 CFR 240.19b-4(f)(2).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

I. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement of the Terms of Substance
of the Proposed Rule Change

    The Exchange proposes to amend its fee schedule reflected in
Exchange Rule 11.10(A) to provide for a quotation fee. The quotation
fee would be based upon the number of changes to the price or size of
an ETP Holder's displayed bid or offer on the Exchange (``quotation
updates'') and would apply only to the extent the ETP Holder's average
number of daily quotation updates is greater than 3 million. Below is
the text of the proposed rule change, as amended. Proposed new language
is in italics.

RULES OF NATIONAL STOCK EXCHANGE

* * * * *

CHAPTER XI

Trading Rules

* * * * *

Rule 11.10 National Securities Trading System Fees

A. Trading Fees
    (a)-(r) No change.
    (s) Quotation Fee. ETP Holders will be charged for quotation
updates based upon the per quotation update rates as noted below. A
``quotation update'' means each change to the price or size of an ETP
Holder's displayed bid or offer on the Exchange.

------------------------------------------------------------------------
       Avg. daily quotation updates          Charge per quotation update
------------------------------------------------------------------------
0 to 3,000,000............................  $0.00
3,000,001 and higher......................  $0.01 over 3,000,000
------------------------------------------------------------------------

* * * * *

II. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement of the Purpose of, and
Statutory Basis for, the Proposed Rule Change

    In its filing with the Commission, the Exchange included statements
concerning the purpose of and basis for the proposed rule change, as
amended, and discussed any comments it received on the proposed rule
change. The text of these statements may be examined at the places
specified in Item IV below. The Exchange has prepared summaries, set
forth in Sections A, B, and C below, of the most significant aspects of
such statements.

A. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement of the Purpose of, and
Statutory Basis for, the Proposed Rule Change

1. Purpose
    The Exchange's fee schedule reflected in Exchange Rule 11.10(A)
currently provides for fees payable by ETP Holders based upon, among
other things, transactions executed on the Exchange, but does not
provide for any fees based solely upon the number of changes to the
price or size of an ETP Holder's quotation updates. However, NSX states
that quotation updates can affect both the Exchange's systems resources
and its regulatory functions. For example, a sufficiently high level of
quotation updates could require that the Exchange expend additional
resources on its systems technology in order to avoid capacity and
performance degradation issues. NSX states that the levels of
surveillance and investigation required in order for the Exchange to
adequately discharge its self-regulatory obligations also increase with
an increase in quotation updates. For these reasons, the Exchange
believes that it is appropriate to charge a fee for high levels of
quotation updates that consume a high amount of the Exchange's systems
capacity and require a higher amount of regulatory scrutiny.
    The proposed quotation fee would be based upon the number of
quotations updates posted by an ETP Holder, but would apply only to the
extent that an ETP Holder averages in excess of 3 million quotation
updates per day. The Exchange is proposing to charge ETP Holders that
provide quotation updates in excess of 3 million updates on an average
daily basis a penny a quote for all quotation updates in excess of 3
million.\5\ The average daily quotation updates would be calculated on
a monthly basis taking the total quotation updates for the month-end
period (``TQU'') and dividing the TQU by the number of trading days the
ETP Holder provides quotation updates. Three million would be
subtracted from this average daily quotation to yield the amount of
daily quotations in excess of 3 million quotes. The excess would be
multiplied by a penny to yield the daily

quote charge. The daily quote charge would be multiplied by the number
of trading days quoted for the month to yield the monthly quote charge.
NSX states that the monthly quote charge would be collected by the
Exchange on a monthly basis. The formula for the quote charge thus is:
    [(Number of quotation updates for the month/number of trading days
quoted) -3,000,000] x $.01 x the number of trading days quoted.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \5\ Thus, for example, an ETP Holder that has an averaged daily
quotation updates of 3,000,001 would be assessed a penny and not
have to pay $30,000.01.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    NSX states that, in deciding whether to assess a quote fee, it made
a business decision to allow a certain level of quote traffic as part
of any Equity Trading Permit regardless of any trading activity through
NSX. The Exchange states that it determined to use 3 million as the
baseline for its quoting traffic after taking into consideration a
number of business concerns. According to NSX, these concerns include,
but are not limited to, the cost to the Exchange assessed by the
Consolidated Quotation Service and the Securities Information Processor
for Tape C securities (including the cost of penalties for exceeding
capacity), the cost to the Exchange for software and hardware costs
associated with increased capacity, the average number of quotes
provided by ETP Holders, the capacity of the old NSTS System, and the
increased regulatory costs associated with the surveillance and
investigations of ETP Holders. NSX states that any ETP Holder could
choose to remain under the baseline for quoting traffic and not be
charged any quote fee, or could choose to exceed the baseline and be
charged only for those quote updates in excess of the baseline. Thus,
the rule would apply equally to all ETP Holders. The Exchange states
that the rule also benefits ETP Holders as it allows them to plan for
and administer their quoting traffic based on cost considerations
during the interim period until the Exchange's new trading system is
launched.
    NSX states that the quotation fee has been designed in this manner
in order to ensure that the Exchange can continue to fulfill its
obligations under Section 6(b) of the Act \6\ in the event of a high
volume of quotation updates on the Exchange.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \6\ 15 U.S.C. 78f(b).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

2. Statutory Basis
    The Exchange believes that the proposed rule change, as amended, is
consistent with Section 6(b) of the Act,\7\ in general, and furthers
the objectives of Section 6(b)(4) of the Act,\8\ in particular, in that
it is designed to provide for the equitable allocation of reasonable
dues, fees, and other charges. The Exchange also believes that the
proposed rule change, as amended, furthers the objectives of Section
6(b)(1) of the Act \9\ in that it helps to assure that the Exchange is
so organized and has the capacity to be able to carry out the purposes
of the Act and to comply, and to enforce compliance by its ETP Holders
with the Act.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \7\ 15 U.S.C. 78f(b).
    \8\ 15 U.S.C. 78f(b)(4).
    \9\ 15 U.S.C. 78f(b)(1).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

B. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement on Burden on Competition

    The Exchange does not believe that the proposed rule change, as
amended, will impose any burden on competition that is not necessary or
appropriate in furtherance of the purposes of the Act.

C. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement on Comments on the Proposed
Rule Change Received From Members, Participants, or Others

    The Exchange neither solicited nor received comments on the
proposed rule change, as amended.

III. Date of Effectiveness of the Proposed Rule Change and Timing for
Commission Action

    The foregoing proposed rule change, as amended, has been designated
as a fee change pursuant to Section 19(b)(3)(A)(ii) of the Act \10\ and
Rule 19b-4(f)(2) \11\ thereunder, because it establishes or changes a
due, fee, or other charge applicable only to a member imposed by the
Exchange. Accordingly, the proposal will take effect upon filing with
the Commission. At any time within 60 days of the filing of such
proposed rule change the Commission may summarily abrogate such rule
change if it appears to the Commission that such action is necessary or
appropriate in the public interest, for the protection of investors, or
otherwise in furtherance of the purposes of the Act.\12\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \10\ 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(3)(A)(ii).
    \11\ 17 CFR 240.19b-4(f)(2).
    \12\ 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(3)(C). For purposes of calculating the 60-
day period within which the Commission may summarily abrogate the
proposal, the Commission considers the period to commence on July
20, 2006, the date on which the Exchange submitted Amendment No. 2.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

IV. Solicitation of Comments

    Interested persons are invited to submit written data, views, and
arguments concerning the foregoing, including whether the proposed rule
change, as amended, is consistent with the Act. Comments may be
submitted by any of the following methods:

Electronic Comments

     Use the Commission's Internet comment form (http://www.sec.gov/rules/sro.shtml.
); or     Send an e-mail to<EMAIL_ADDRESS>Please include

File Number SR-NSX-2006-09 on the subject line.

Paper Comments

     Send paper comments in triplicate to Nancy M. Morris,
Secretary, Securities and Exchange Commission, 100 F Street, NE.,
Washington, DC 20549-1090.

All submissions should refer to File Number SR-NSX-2006-09. This file
number should be included on the subject line if e-mail is used. To
help the Commission process and review your comments more efficiently,
please use only one method. The Commission will post all comments on
the Commission's Internet Web site (http://www.sec.gov/rules/sro.shtml
). Copies of the submission, all subsequent amendments, all

written statements with respect to the proposed rule change that are
filed with the Commission, and all written communications relating to
the proposed rule change between the Commission and any person, other
than those that may be withheld from the public in accordance with the
provisions of 5 U.S.C. 552, will be available for inspection and
copying in the Commission's Public Reference Room. Copies of such
filing also will be available for inspection and copying at the
principal office of the Exchange. All comments received will be posted
without change; the Commission does not edit personal identifying
information from submissions. You should submit only information that
you wish to make available publicly. All submissions should refer to
File Number SR-NSX-2006-09 and should be submitted on or before August
16, 2006.

    For the Commission, by the Division of Market Regulation,
pursuant to delegated authority.\13\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \13\ 17 CFR 200.30-3(a)(12).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

J. Lynn Taylor,
Assistant Secretary.
 [FR Doc. E6-11927 Filed 7-25-06; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 8010-01-P


[Federal Register Volume 79, Number 56 (Monday, March 24, 2014)]
[Notices]
[Page 16072]
[FR Doc No: 2014-06303]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

[Release No. 34-71733; File No. SR-NYSEArca-2014-04]

Self-Regulatory Organizations; NYSE Arca, Inc.; Notice of
Designation of Longer Period for Commission Action on Proposed Rule
Change To Amend Its Rules by Revising the Order of Priority of Bids and
Offers When Executing Orders in Open Outcry

March 18, 2014.
    On January 15, 2014, NYSE Arca, Inc. (``NYSE Arca'' or
``Exchange'') filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission
(``Commission''), pursuant to Section 19(b)(1) of the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934 (``Act'') \1\ and Rule 19b-4 thereunder,\2\ a
proposed rule change to amend its rules by revising the order of
priority of bids and offers when executing orders in open outcry. The
proposed rule change was published for comment in the Federal Register
on February 3, 2014.\3\ The Commission received nine comment letters
from seven commenters.\4\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \1\ 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(1).
    \2\ 17 CFR 240.19b-4.
    \3\ See Securities Exchange Act Release No. 71425 (January 28,
2014), 79 FR 6258.
    \4\ See Letter from Darren Story, dated January 29, 2014
(``Story Letter''); Letter from Abraham Kohen, AK FE Consultants,
dated January 31, 2014 (``Kohen Letter I''); Letter from David
Spack, Chief Compliance Officer, Casey Securities, LLC, dated
February 3, 2014 (``Casey Letter''); Letter from Abraham Kohen, AK
FE Consultants, dated February 4, 2014 (``Kohen Letter II''); Letter
from Angel Alvira, dated February 12, 2014 (``Alvira Letter'');
Letter from Donald Hart, dated February 12, 2014 (``Hart Letter
I''); Letter from Doug Patterson, Chief Compliance Officer, Cutler
Group, LP, dated February 13, 2014 (``Cutler Letter''); Letter from
Donald Hart, dated February 18, 2014 (``Hart Letter II''); and
Letter from Gerald D. O'Connell, Chief Regulatory Officer,
Susquehanna International Group, LLP, dated March 14, 2014 (``SIG
Letter'').
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    Section 19(b)(2) of the Act \5\ provides that within 45 days of the
publication of notice of the filing of a proposed rule change, or
within such longer period up to 90 days as the Commission may designate
if it finds such longer period to be appropriate and publishes its
reasons for so finding or as to which the self-regulatory organization
consents, the Commission shall either approve the proposed rule change,
disapprove the proposed rule change, or institute proceedings to
determine whether these proposed rule changes should be disapproved.
The 45th day for this filing is March 20, 2014.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \5\ 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(2).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    The Commission is extending the 45-day time period for Commission
action on the proposed rule change. The Commission finds that it is
appropriate to designate a longer period within which to take action on
the proposed rule change so that it has sufficient time to consider and
take action on the Exchange's proposed rule change.
    Accordingly, pursuant to Section 19(b)(2)(A)(ii)(I) of the Act \6\
and for the reasons stated above, the Commission designates May 2,
2014, as the date by which the Commission should either approve or
disapprove, or institute proceedings to determine whether to
disapprove, the proposed rule change (File No. SR-NYSEArca-2014-04).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \6\ 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(2)(A)(ii)(I).
    \7\ 17 CFR 200.30-3(a)(31).

    For the Commission, by the Division of Trading and Markets,
pursuant to delegated authority.\7\
Kevin M. O'Neill,
Deputy Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2014-06303 Filed 3-21-14; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 8011-01-P


[Federal Register Volume 85, Number 117 (Wednesday, June 17, 2020)]
[Notices]
[Page 36572]
[FR Doc No: 2020-13018]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission

[Docket No. ID-8946-000]

Gorsich, Matthew; Notice of Filing

    Take notice that on June 10, 2020, Matthew Gorsich, submitted for
filing, application for authority to hold interlocking positions,
pursuant to section 305(b) of the Federal Power Act, 16 U.S.C. 825d(b)
(2018) and part 45 of the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission's
(Commission) Rules of Practice and Procedure, 18 CFR part 45 (2019).
    Any person desiring to intervene or to protest this filing must
file in accordance with Rules 211 and 214 of the Commission's Rules of
Practice and Procedure (18 CFR 385.211, 385.214). Protests will be
considered by the Commission in determining the appropriate action to
be taken but will not serve to make protestants parties to the
proceeding. Any person wishing to become a party must file a notice of
intervention or motion to intervene, as appropriate. Such notices,
motions, or protests must be filed on or before the comment date. On or
before the comment date, it is not necessary to serve motions to
intervene or protests on persons other than the Applicant.
    In addition to publishing the full text of this document in the
Federal Register, the Commission provides all interested persons an
opportunity to view and/or print the contents of this document via the
internet through the Commission's Home Page (http://ferc.gov) using the
``eLibrary'' link. Enter the docket number excluding the last three
digits in the docket number field to access the document. At this time,
the Commission has suspended access to the Commission's Public
Reference Room, due to the proclamation declaring a National Emergency
concerning the Novel Coronavirus Disease (COVID-19), issued by the
President on March 13, 2020. For assistance, contact the Federal Energy
Regulatory Commission at<EMAIL_ADDRESS>or call toll-free,
(886) 208-3676 or TYY,<PHONE_NUMBER>.
    The Commission strongly encourages electronic filings of comments,
protests and interventions in lieu of paper using the ``eFiling'' link
at http://www.ferc.gov. Persons unable to file electronically may mail
similar pleadings to the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission, 888
First Street NE, Washington, DC 20426. Hand delivered submissions in
docketed proceedings should be delivered to Health and Human Services,
12225 Wilkins Avenue, Rockville, Maryland 20852.
    Comment Date: 5:00 p.m. Eastern Time on July 1, 2020.

    Dated: June 11, 2020.
Nathaniel J. Davis, Sr.,
Deputy Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2020-13018 Filed 6-16-20; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6717-01-P


[Federal Register Volume 78, Number 40 (Thursday, February 28, 2013)]
[Notices]
[Pages 13665-13666]
[FR Doc No: 2013-04657]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission

[Project No. 8233-001]

L.E. Bell Construction Company, Inc.; Notice of Termination of
Exemption by Implied Surrender and Soliciting Comments, Protests, and
Motions To Intervene

    Take notice that the following hydroelectric proceeding has been
initiated by the Commission:
    a. Type of Proceeding: Termination of exemption by implied
surrender.
    b. Project No.: 8233-001.
    c. Date Initiated: February 21, 2013.
    d. Exemptee: L.E. Bell Construction Company, Inc.
    e. Name and Location of Project: The Tallapoosa River Hydroelectric
Project is located on the Tallapoosa River in Cleburne County, Alabama.
    f. Filed Pursuant to: 18 CFR 4.106.
    g. Exemptee Contact Information: Mr. Larry E. Bell and Ms. Lynne B.
Pyle, L.E. Bell Construction Company, Inc., 1226 County Road 11,
Heflin, AL, 36264.
    h. FERC Contact: Krista Sakallaris<PHONE_NUMBER> or
<EMAIL_ADDRESS>    i. Deadline for filing comments, protests, and motions to intervene
is 30 days from the issuance of this notice by the Commission. Please
file your submittal electronically via the Internet (eFiling) in lieu
of paper. Please refer to the instructions on the Commission's Web site
under http://www.ferc.gov/docs-filing/efiling.asp and filing
instructions in the Commission's Regulations at 18 CFR section
385.2001(a)(1)(iii).\1\ To assist you with eFilings you should refer to
the submission guidelines document at http://www.ferc.gov/help/submission-guide/user-guide.pdf. In addition, certain filing
requirements have statutory or regulatory formatting and other
instructions. You should refer to a list of these ``qualified
documents'' at http://www.ferc.gov/docs-filing/efiling/filing.pdf. You
must include your name and contact information at the end of your
comments. Please include the project number (P-8233-001) on any
documents or motions filed. The Commission strongly encourages
electronic filings; otherwise, you should submit an original and seven
copies of its submittal to the following address: The Secretary,
Federal Energy Regulatory Commission, Mail Code: DHAC, PJ-12, 888 First
Street NE., Washington, DC 20426.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \1\ http://www.ferc.gov/legal/fed-sta.asp Select the link for
Code of Federal Regulations and navigate to Sec.  385.2001.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    j. Description of Existing Facilities: The inoperative project
consists of the following existing facilities: (1) A 16-foot-high, 100-
foot-long concrete dam; (2) a reservoir with negligible storage
capacity at elevation 819 feet m.s.l.; (3) a powerhouse at the base of
the dam containing three generating units with a total rated capacity
of 400 kW; and (4) a 300-foot-long transmission line tying into the
existing Alabama Power Company's system.
    k. Description of Proceeding: The exemptee is in violation of
Standard Article 1 of its exemption, which was granted on May 13, 1985
(31 FERC ] 62,201). The Commission's regulation, 18 CFR 4.106,
provides, among other things, that the Commission reserves the right to
revoke an exemption if any term or condition of the exemption is
violated. The project has not operated since 1996 and the reservoir has
been drained.
    In November 2010 and in May of 2013 the Commission sent the
exemptee letters providing details for filing a surrender application
and requiring the exemptee to file information regarding their
intentions to restore operation to the project. In January 2013, the
Commission sent a letter requiring the exemptee to show cause why the
Commission should not initial proceedings to terminate the exemption
for failure to resume generation at the project. The exemptee has not
responded to any of the Commissions correspondence, nor have they filed
a surrender application.
    l. This notice is available for review and reproduction at the
Commission in the Public Reference Room, Room 2A, 888 First Street NE.,
Washington, DC 20426. The filing may also be viewed on the Commission's
Web site at http://www.ferc.gov/docs-filing/elibrary.asp. Enter the
Docket number (P-8233-001) excluding the last three digits in the
docket number field to access the notice. You may also register online
at http://www.ferc.gov/docs-filing/esubscription.asp to be notified via
email of new filings and issuances related to this or other pending
projects. For assistance, call toll-free 1-866-208-3676 or email
<EMAIL_ADDRESS>For TTY, call<PHONE_NUMBER>.
    m. Individuals desiring to be included on the Commission's mailing
list should so indicate by writing to the Secretary of the Commission.
    n. Comments, Protests, or Motions To Intervene--Anyone may submit
comments, a protest, or a motion to intervene in accordance with the

requirements of Rules of Practice and Procedure, 18 CFR 385.210,
385.211, and 385.214. In determining the appropriate action to take,
the Commission will consider all protests filed, but only those who
file a motion to intervene in accordance with the Commission's Rules
may become a party to the proceeding. Any protests or motions to
intervene must be received on or before the specified deadline date for
the particular proceeding.
    o. Filing and Service of Responsive Documents--Any filing must (1)
bear in all capital letters the title ``COMMENTS'', ``PROTEST'', or
``MOTION TO INTERVENE,'' as applicable; (2) set forth in the heading
the project number of the proceeding to which the filing responds; (3)
furnish the name, address, and telephone number of the person
commenting, protesting or intervening; and (4) otherwise comply with
the requirements of 18 CFR 385.2001 through 385.2005. All comments,
protests or motions to intervene must set forth their evidentiary basis
and otherwise comply with the requirements of 18 CFR 4.34(b). All
comments, protests, or motions to intervene should relate to project
works which are the subject of the termination of exemption. A copy of
any protest or motion to intervene must be served upon each
representative of the Exemptee specified in item g above. If an
intervener files comments or documents with the Commission relating to
the merits of an issue that may affect the responsibilities of a
particular resource agency, they must also serve a copy of the document
on that resource agency. A copy of all other filings in reference to
this notice must be accompanied by proof of service on all persons
listed in the service list prepared by the Commission in this
proceeding, in accordance with 18 CFR 4.34(b) and 385.2010.
    p. Agency Comments--Federal, state, and local agencies are invited
to file comments on the described proceeding. If any agency does not
file comments within the time specified for filing comments, it will be
presumed to have no comments.

    Dated: February 21, 2013.
Kimberly D. Bose,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2013-04657 Filed 2-27-13; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6717-01-P


[Federal Register: March 26, 2008 (Volume 73, Number 59)]
[Notices]
[Page 16079-16080]
[DOCID:fr26mr08-130]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

[Release No. 34-57531; File No. SR-Amex-2008-24]

Self-Regulatory Organizations; American Stock Exchange LLC;
Notice of Filing and Immediate Effectiveness of Proposed Rule Change
Relating to Additional Options Classes in the Options Penny Quoting
Pilot Program

March 19, 2008.
    Pursuant to Section 19(b)(1) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934
(``Act''),\1\ and Rule 19b-4 thereunder,\2\ notice is hereby given that
on March 17, 2008, the American Stock Exchange LLC (``Amex'' or
``Exchange'') filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission
(``Commission'') the proposed rule change as described in Items I, II,
and III below, which Items have been substantially prepared by the
Amex. The Exchange has designated this proposal as one constituting a
stated policy, practice, or interpretation with respect to the meaning,
administration, or enforcement of an existing rule under Section
19(b)(3)(A)(i) of the Act \3\ and Rule 19b-4(f)(1) thereunder,\4\ which
renders the proposal effective upon filing with the Commission. The
Commission is publishing this notice to solicit comments on the
proposed rule change from interested persons.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \1\ 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(1).
    \2\ 17 CFR 240.19b-4.
    \3\ 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(3)(A)(i).
    \4\ 17 CFR 240.19b-4(f)(1).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

I. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement of the Terms of Substance
of the Proposed Rule Change

    Amex proposes to identify the additional options classes that will
be subject to the current pilot program for the quoting of options
classes in pennies (the ``Penny Quoting Pilot Program'' or ``Pilot
Program'').
    The text of the proposed rule change is available on the Exchange's
Web site (http://www.amex.com), at the Amex's Office of the Secretary,
and at the Commission's Public Reference Room.

II. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement of the Purpose of, and
Statutory Basis for, the Proposed Rule Change

    In its filing with the Commission, the Amex included statements
concerning the purpose of, and basis for, the proposed rule change and
discussed any comments it received on the proposed rule change. The
text of these statements may be examined at the places specified in
Item IV below. The Amex has prepared summaries, set forth in Sections
A, B, and C below, of the most significant aspects of such statements.

A. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement of the Purpose of, and
Statutory Basis for, the Proposed Rule Change

1. Purpose
    The Amex proposes to identify for market participants the
additional options classes that will be included in the current Penny
Quoting Pilot Program.\5\ The Exchange believes that this proposal is
necessary in order to adequately notify market participants regarding
the upcoming addition of options classes that will be included in the
current Pilot Program.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \5\ See Securities Exchange Act Release Nos. 55162 (January 24,
2007), 72 FR 4738 (February 1, 2007) (SR-Amex-2006-106); 56159 (July
27, 2007), 72 FR 43300 (August 3, 2007) (SR-Amex-2007-76); and 56567
(September 27, 2007), 72 FR 56396 (October 3, 2007) (SR-Amex-2007-
96) (the ``September 2007 Order'').
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    The current Penny Quoting Pilot Program includes thirty-five (35)
options classes. As set forth in the September 2007 Order, the
expansion of the Pilot Program is to occur in two (2) phases. Under the
first phase, which began on September 28, 2007, the Exchange expanded
the Pilot Program to include an additional twenty-two (22) options
classes. These consisted of the most actively-traded options classes
(excluding Google (GOOG), Nasdaq-100 Index (NDX) and the Russell 2000
Index (RUT)). The thirty-five (35) current options classes included in
the Penny Quoting Pilot Program represent approximately 35% of total
industry options volume.
    The second phase, which is scheduled to commence on March 28, 2008,
will add twenty-eight (28) additional option classes. The Commission in
the September 2007 Order previously approved this expansion of twenty-
eight additional options classes, however, at that time, the actual
identity of the options classes to be included in the Pilot Program was
undecided. Accordingly, the instant proposal identifies these twenty-
eight (28) additional options classes for phase two of the Pilot
Program. Attached as Exhibit 2 to the filing is a draft Regulatory
Circular setting forth the list of additional options classes to be
included in the Pilot Program. The Pilot Program will then consist of
sixty-three (63) options classes representing approximately 50% of
total industry options volume.
    The current Penny Quoting Pilot Program will terminate, unless
extended, on March 27, 2009.
    The Exchange continues to believe that the additional options
classes that may quote in pennies under the Pilot Program is reasonable
given the system capacity constraints and quote mitigation strategies
in place at the Amex as well as the other options exchanges.
2. Statutory Basis
    The proposed rule change is consistent with Section 6(b) of the Act
\6\ in general and furthers the objectives of Section 6(b)(5),\7\ in
particular, in that it is designed to prevent fraudulent and
manipulative acts and practices, to promote just and equitable
principles of trade, to remove impediments to and perfect the mechanism
of a free and open market and a national market system, and, in
general, to protect investors and the public interest. The Exchange
believes that the identity of the additional options classes in this
filing will provide market participants

adequate notification of future changes to the Pilot Program.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \6\ 15 U.S.C. 78f(b).
    \7\ 15 U.S.C. 78f(b)(5).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

B. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement on Burden on Competition

    The proposed rule change will impose no burden on competition that
is not necessary or appropriate in furtherance of the purposes of the
Act.

C. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement on Comments on the Proposed
Rule Change Received From Members, Participants, or Others

    No written comments were solicited or received with respect to the
proposed rule change.

III. Date of Effectiveness of the Proposed Rule Change and Timing for
Commission Action

    The proposed rule change has become effective pursuant to Section
19(b)(3)(A)(i) of the Act \8\ and Rule 19b-4(f)(1) thereunder,\9\
because it constitutes a stated policy, practice, or interpretation
with respect to the meaning, administration, or enforcement of an
existing rule of the Amex.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \8\ 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(3)(A)(i).
    \9\ 17 CFR 240.19b-4(f)(1).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    At any time within 60 days of the filing of the proposed rule
change, the Commission may summarily abrogate such rule change if it
appears to the Commission that such action is necessary or appropriate
in the public interest, for the protection of investors, or otherwise
in furtherance of the purposes of the Act.\10\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \10\ See 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(3)(C).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

IV. Solicitation of Comments

    Interested persons are invited to submit written data, views, and
arguments concerning the foregoing, including whether the proposed rule
change is consistent with the Act. Comments may be submitted by any of
the following methods:

Electronic Comments

     Use the Commission's Internet comment form (http://
www.sec.gov/rules/sro.shtml); or
     Send an e-mail to<EMAIL_ADDRESS>Please include
File Number SR-Amex-2008-24 on the subject line.

Paper Comments

     Send paper comments in triplicate to Nancy M. Morris,
Secretary, Securities and Exchange Commission, 100 F Street, NE.,
Washington, DC 20549-1090.

All submissions should refer to File Number SR-Amex-2008-24. This file
number should be included on the subject line if e-mail is used. To
help the Commission process and review your comments more efficiently,
please use only one method. The Commission will post all comments on
the Commission's Internet Web site (http://www.sec.gov/rules/
sro.shtml). Copies of the submission, all subsequent amendments, all
written statements with respect to the proposed rule change that are
filed with the Commission, and all written communications relating to
the proposed rule change between the Commission and any person, other
than those that may be withheld from the public in accordance with the
provisions of 5 U.S.C. 552, will be available for inspection and
copying in the Commission's Public Reference Room, on official business
days between the hours of 10 a.m. and 3 p.m. Copies of the filing also
will be available for inspection and copying at the principal office of
the Amex. All comments received will be posted without change; the
Commission does not edit personal identifying information from
submissions. You should submit only information that you wish to make
available publicly. All submissions should refer to File Number SR-
Amex-2008-24 and should be submitted on or before April 16, 2008.

    For the Commission, by the Division of Trading and Markets,
pursuant to delegated authority.\11\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \11\ 17 CFR 200.30-3(a)(12).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

Florence E. Harmon,
Deputy Secretary.
 [FR Doc. E8-6125 Filed 3-25-08; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 8011-01-P