[Federal Register Volume 87, Number 41 (Wednesday, March 2, 2022)]
[Proposed Rules]
[Pages 11657-11659]
[FR Doc No: 2022-04290]

=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION

Federal Aviation Administration

14 CFR Part 71

[Docket No. FAA-2022-0110; Airspace Docket No. 22-AAL-7]
RIN 2120-AA66

Proposed Revocation of Colored Federal Airway Blue 26 (B-26);
Fort Yukon, AK

AGENCY: Federal Aviation Administration (FAA), DOT.

ACTION: Notice of proposed rulemaking (NPRM).

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: This action proposes to revoke Colored Federal airway Blue 26
(B-26) in the vicinity of Fort Yukon, AK due to the pending
decommissioning of the Yukon River, AK, (FTO) Non-directional Beacon
(NDB).

DATES: Comments must be received on or before April 18, 2022.

ADDRESSES: Send comments on this proposal to the U.S. Department of
Transportation, Docket Operations, 1200 New Jersey Avenue SE, West
Building Ground Floor, Room W12-140, Washington, DC 20590; telephone:
1(800) 647-5527, or<PHONE_NUMBER>. You must identify FAA Docket No.
FAA-2022-0110; Airspace Docket No. 22-AAL-7 at the beginning of your
comments. You may also submit comments through the internet at https://www.regulations.gov.
    FAA Order JO 7400.11F, Airspace Designations and Reporting Points,
and subsequent amendments can be viewed online at https://www.faa.gov/air_traffic/publications/. For further information, you can contact the
Rules and Regulations Group, Federal Aviation Administration, 800
Independence Avenue SW, Washington, DC 20591; telephone: (202) 267-
8783. FAA Order JO 7400.11F is also available for inspection at the
National Archives and Records Administration (NARA). For information on
the availability of FAA Order JO 7400.11F at NARA, email:
[email protected] or go to https://www.archives.gov/federal-register/cfr/ibr-locations.html.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Christopher McMullin, Rules and
Regulations Group, Office of Policy, Federal Aviation Administration,
800 Independence Avenue SW, Washington, DC 20591; telephone: (202) 267-
8783.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

Authority for This Rulemaking

    The FAA's authority to issue rules regarding aviation safety is
found in Title 49 of the United States Code. Subtitle I, Section 106
describes the authority of the FAA Administrator. Subtitle VII,
Aviation Programs, describes in more detail the scope of the agency's
authority. This rulemaking is promulgated under the authority described
in Subtitle VII, Part A, Subpart I, Section 40103. Under that section,
the FAA is charged with prescribing regulations to assign the use of
the airspace necessary to ensure the safety of aircraft and the
efficient use of airspace. This regulation is within the scope of that
authority as it would modify the route structure as necessary to
preserve the safe and efficient flow of air traffic within the National
Airspace System (NAS).

Comments Invited

    Interested parties are invited to participate in this proposed
rulemaking by submitting such written data, views, or arguments as they
may desire. Comments that provide the factual basis supporting the
views and suggestions presented are particularly helpful in developing
reasoned regulatory decisions on the proposal. Comments are
specifically invited on the overall regulatory, aeronautical, economic,
environmental, and energy-related aspects of the proposal.
    Communications should identify both docket numbers (FAA Docket No.
FAA-2022-0110; Airspace Docket No. 22-AAL-7) and be submitted in
triplicate to the Docket Management Facility (see ADDRESSES section for
address and phone number). You may also submit comments through the
internet at https://www.regulations.gov.
    Commenters wishing the FAA to acknowledge receipt of their comments
on this action must submit with those comments a self-addressed,
stamped postcard on which the following statement is made: ``Comments
to FAA Docket No. FAA-2022-0110; Airspace Docket
    No. 22-AAL-7.'' The postcard will be date/time stamped and returned
to the commenter.
    All communications received on or before the specified comment
closing date will be considered before taking action on the proposed
rule. The proposal contained in this action may be changed in light of
comments received. All comments submitted will be available for
examination in the public docket both before and after the comment
closing date. A report summarizing each substantive public contact with
FAA personnel concerned with this rulemaking will be filed in the
docket.

Availability of NPRM

    An electronic copy of this document may be downloaded through the
internet at https://www.regulations.gov. Recently published rulemaking
documents can also be accessed through the FAA's web page at https://www.faa.gov/air_traffic/publications/airspace_amendments/.
    You may review the public docket containing the proposal, any
comments received and any final disposition in person in the Dockets
Office (see ADDRESSES section for address and phone number) between
9:00 a.m. and 5:00 p.m., Monday through Friday, except Federal
holidays. An informal docket may also be examined during normal
business hours at the office of the Operations Support Group, Western
Service Center, Federal Aviation Administration, 2200 South 216th St.,
Des Moines, WA 98198.

Availability and Summary of Documents for Incorporation by Reference

    This document proposes to amend FAA Order JO 7400.11F, Airspace
Designations and Reporting Points, dated August 10, 2021, and effective
September 15, 2021. FAA Order JO 7400.11F is publicly available as
listed in the ADDRESSES section of this document. FAA Order JO 7400.11F
lists Class A, B, C, D, and E airspace areas, air traffic service
routes, and reporting points.

Background

    The FAA provided notice to the public that the FAA would be
conducting an aeronautical study of the proposal to decommission the
Yukon River, AK, (FTO) NDB in Fort Yukon, AK in July 2021. The high
cost to operate and maintain FTO were the main factors behind this
consideration to decommission the NDB. The FAA conducted a non-
rulemaking study in accordance with FAA Order JO 7400.2, Procedures for
Handling Airspace Matters. As a result of the study, the FAA did not
receive any objections to the removal of the NDB along with the
supported airway.
    Colored Federal airway Blue 26 (B-26) is dependent upon FTO and
navigates between the Fort Yukon Airport (FYU), Alaska and the Ladd
Army Airfield Airport (FBK), Alaska. The decommissioning of FTO would
result in B-26 being unusable. The current mitigation to the proposed
revocation of B-26 is to utilize VHF Omnidirectional Radar (VOR)
Federal airway V-301 and Colored Federal airway Amber 17 (A-17). Future
mitigation is also in the plans to provide a United States Area
Navigation route as an additional option.

The Proposal

    The FAA is proposing an amendment to 14 CFR part 71 to revoke
Colored Federal airway B-26 due to the decommissioning of FTO. B-26
currently navigates between the Chena, AK, (CUN) NDB and FTO. The FAA
proposes to revoke Colored Federal airway B-26 in its entirety.
    Colored Federal airways are published in paragraph 6009(d) of FAA
Order JO 7400.11F dated August 10, 2021 and effective September 15,
2021, which is incorporated by reference in 14 CFR 71.1. The Colored
Federal airway listed in this document would be published subsequently
in FAA Order JO 7400.11.
    FAA Order JO 7400.11, Airspace Designations and Reporting Points,
is published yearly and effective on September 15.

Regulatory Notices and Analyses

    The FAA has determined that this proposed regulation only involves
an established body of technical regulations for which frequent and
routine amendments are necessary to keep them operationally current.
It, therefore: (1) Is not a ``significant regulatory action'' under
Executive Order 12866; (2) is not a ``significant rule'' under
Department of Transportation (DOT) Regulatory Policies and Procedures
(44 FR 11034; February 26, 1979); and (3) does not warrant preparation
of a regulatory evaluation as the anticipated impact is so minimal.
Since this is a routine matter that will only affect air traffic
procedures and air navigation, it is certified that this proposed rule,
when promulgated, will not have a significant economic impact on a
substantial number of small entities under the criteria of the
Regulatory Flexibility Act.

Environmental Review

    This proposal will be subject to an environmental analysis in
accordance with FAA Order 1050.1F, ``Environmental Impacts: Policies
and Procedures'' prior to any FAA final regulatory action.

List of Subjects in 14 CFR Part 71

    Airspace, Incorporation by reference, Navigation (air).

The Proposed Amendment

    In consideration of the foregoing, the Federal Aviation
Administration proposes to amend 14 CFR part 71 as follows:

PART 71--DESIGNATION OF CLASS A, B, C, D, AND E AIRSPACE AREAS; AIR
TRAFFIC SERVICE ROUTES; AND REPORTING POINTS

0
1. The authority citation for 14 CFR part 71 continues to read as
follows:

    Authority:  49 U.S.C. 106(f), 106(g); 40103, 40113, 40120; E.O.
10854, 24 FR 9565, 3 CFR, 1959-1963 Comp., p. 389.

Sec.  71.1   [Amended]

0
2. The incorporation by reference in 14 CFR 71.1 of FAA Order JO
7400.11F, Airspace Designations and Reporting Points, dated August 10,
2021, and effective September 15, 2021, is amended as follows:

Paragraph 6009(d) Colored Federal Airway

* * * * *

B-26 [Remove]

* * * * *

    Issued in Washington, DC, on February 24, 2022.
Michael R. Beckles,
Manager, Rules and Regulations Group.
[FR Doc. 2022-04290 Filed 3-1-22; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910-13-P


[Federal Register Volume 78, Number 38 (Tuesday, February 26, 2013)]
[Notices]
[Page 13049]
[FR Doc No: 2013-04316]

=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission

Combined Notice of Filings 1

    Take notice that the Commission received the following electric
rate filings:

    Docket Numbers: ER10-3069-003; ER10-3070-003.
    Applicants: Alcoa Power Generating Inc., Alcoa Power Marketing LLC.
    Description: Alcoa Power Generating Inc., et al. submit response to
January 25, 2013 request for additional information.
    Filed Date: 2/14/13.
    Accession Number: 20130214-5182.
    Comments Due: 5 p.m. ET 3/7/13.

    Docket Numbers: ER13-639-000; ER13-640-000; ER13-641-000; ER13-642-
000; ER13-643-000; ER13-644-000; ER13-653-000; ER13-646-000; ER13-647-
000; ER13-648-000; ER13-649-000 ER13-650-000; ER13-651-000; ER13-652-
000; ER10-2362-002; ER10-2363-002; ER10-2364-002; ER10-2365-002 ER10-
2366-002; ER10-2367-002; ER11-4351-002.
    Applicants: Broken Bow Wind, LLC, Coalinga Cogeneration Company,
Kern River Cogeneration Company, Mid-Set Cogeneration Company, Salinas
River Cogeneration Company, Sargent Canyon Cogeneration Company,
Sycamore Cogeneration Company, Pinnacle Wind, LLC, Crofton Bluffs Wind,
LLC, Elkhorn Ridge Wind, LLC, Laredo Ridge Wind, LLC, Taloga Wind, LLC,
San Juan Mesa Wind Project, LLC, Wildorado Wind, LLC, Sleeping Bear,
LLC, CL Power Sales Eight, L.L.C., CP Power Sales Nineteen, L.L.C., CP
Power Sales Seventeen, L.L.C., CP Power Sales Twenty, L.L.C., Edison
Mission Marketing & Trading, Inc., Edison Mission Solutions, L.L.C.
    Description: Edison Mission Group Inc. entities Supplement to
December 28, 2012 Triennial Market Power Analysis for the SPP Region.
    Filed Date: 2/14/13.
    Accession Number: 20130214-5113.
    Comments Due: 5 p.m. ET 3/7/13.

    Docket Numbers: ER13-938-000.
    Applicants: Southwest Power Pool, Inc.
    Description: Revisions to Attachment H Addendum 2-A Part 2--OG&E to
be effective 8/2/2012.
    Filed Date: 2/14/13.
    Accession Number: 20130214-5159.
    Comments Due: 5 p.m. ET 3/7/13.

    Docket Numbers: ER13-939-000.
    Applicants: North Carolina Electric Membership Corporation.
    Description: Petition by North Carolina Electric Membership
Corporation for Limited Waiver of certain PJM Interconnection, L.L.C.
Open Access Transmission Tariff provisions.
    Filed Date: 2/14/13.
    Accession Number: 20130214-5190.
    Comments Due: 5 p.m. ET 3/7/13.

    Take notice that the Commission received the following electric
securities filings:

    Docket Numbers: ES13-17-000
    Applicants: Northern Maine Independent System Administrator, Inc.
    Description: Amendment to Application of Northern Maine Independent
System Administrator, Inc.
    Filed Date: 2/14/13.
    Accession Number: 20130214-5187
    Comments Due: 5 p.m. ET 2/25/13.

    Take notice that the Commission received the following land
acquisition reports:

    Docket Numbers: LA12-3-000
    Applicants: Bluegrass Generation Company, L.L.C., Blythe Energy,
LLC, Calhoun Power Company, LLC, Cherokee County Cogeneration Partners,
LLC, DeSoto County Generating Company, LLC, Doswell Limited
Partnership, Las Vegas Power Company, LLC, LS Power Marketing, LLC, LSP
Safe Harbor Holdings, LLC, LSP University Park, LLC, Renaissance Power,
L.L.C., Riverside Generating Company, L.L.C., Rocky Road Power, LLC,
Tilton Energy LLC, University Park Energy, LLC, Wallingford Energy LLC.
    Description: Supplement to October 13, 2012 Quarterly Land
Acquisition Report of the LS Power Development, LLC MBR Sellers.
    Filed Date: 2/14/13.
    Accession Number: 20130214-5026.
    Comments Due: 5 p.m. ET 3/7/13.

    The filings are accessible in the Commission's eLibrary system by
clicking on the links or querying the docket number.
    Any person desiring to intervene or protest in any of the above
proceedings must file in accordance with Rules 211 and 214 of the
Commission's Regulations (18 CFR 385.211 and 385.214) on or before 5:00
p.m. Eastern time on the specified comment date. Protests may be
considered, but intervention is necessary to become a party to the
proceeding.
    eFiling is encouraged. More detailed information relating to filing
requirements, interventions, protests, service, and qualifying
facilities filings can be found at: http://www.ferc.gov/docs-filing/efiling/filing-req.pdf. For other information, call<PHONE_NUMBER>
(toll free). For TTY, call<PHONE_NUMBER>.

    Dated: February 15, 2013.
Nathaniel J. Davis, Sr.,
Deputy Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2013-04316 Filed 2-25-13; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6717-01-P


[Federal Register Volume 82, Number 193 (Friday, October 6, 2017)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Pages 46679-46681]
[FR Doc No: 2017-21528]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY

40 CFR Part 52

[EPA-R07-OAR-2015-0356; FRL-9968-82-Region 7]

Approval of Missouri Air Quality Implementation Plans;
Infrastructure SIP Requirements for the 2008 Ozone National Ambient Air
Quality Standard

AGENCY: Environmental Protection Agency (EPA).

ACTION: Direct final rule.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) is approving
elements of a State Implementation Plan (SIP) revision from the State
of Missouri for the 2008 Ozone National Ambient Air Quality Standard
(NAAQS). Section 110 of the CAA requires that each state adopt and
submit a SIP for the implementation, maintenance, and enforcement of
each new or revised NAAQS promulgated by EPA. These SIPs are commonly
referred to as ``infrastructure'' SIPs. The infrastructure requirements
are designed to ensure that the structural components of each state's
air quality management program are adequate to meet the state's
responsibilities under the CAA.

DATES: This direct final rule will be effective December 5, 2017,
without further notice, unless EPA receives adverse comment by November
6, 2017. If EPA receives adverse comment, we will publish a timely
withdrawal of the direct final rule in the Federal Register informing
the public that the rule will not take effect.

ADDRESSES: Submit your comments, identified by Docket ID No. EPA-R07-
OAR-2015-0356, to https://www.regulations.gov. Follow the online
instructions for submitting comments. Once submitted, comments cannot
be edited or removed from Regulations.gov. EPA may publish any comment
received to its public docket. Do not submit electronically any
information you consider to be Confidential Business Information (CBI)
or other information whose disclosure is restricted by statute.
Multimedia submissions (audio, video, etc.) must be accompanied by a
written comment. The written comment is considered the official comment
and should include discussion of all points you wish to make. EPA will
generally not consider comments or comment contents located outside of
the primary submission (i.e. on the web, cloud, or other file sharing
system). For additional submission methods, the full EPA public comment
policy, information about CBI or multimedia submissions, and general
guidance on making effective comments, please visit https://www2.epa.gov/dockets/commenting-epa-dockets.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Tracey Casburn, Environmental
Protection Agency, Air Planning and Development Branch, 11201 Renner
Boulevard, Lenexa, Kansas 66219 at<PHONE_NUMBER>, or by email at
<EMAIL_ADDRESS>
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Throughout this document ``we,'' ``us,'' and
``our'' refer to EPA. This section provides additional information by
addressing the following:

I. What is being addressed in this document?
II. Have the requirements for approval of a SIP revision been met?
III. What action is EPA taking?
IV. Statutory and Executive Order Reviews.

I. What is being addressed in this document?

    EPA is approving the infrastructure SIP submission from the State
of Missouri received on July 08, 2013, as meeting the submittal
requirements of 110(a)(1). EPA is approving the following elements of
section 110(a)(2): (A), (B), (C), (D)(i)(II)--prevent significant
deterioration of air quality (prong 3), (D)(ii), (E) through (H), and
(J) through (M). EPA is not acting on the elements of section
110(a)(2)(D)(i)(I)--significant contribution to nonattainment (prong
1), interfering with maintenance of the NAAQs (prong 2) because those
elements were not addressed in the SIP revision submittal. EPA is not
acting on section 110(a)(2)(I). EPA will act on 110(a)(2)(D)(i)(II)--
protection of visibility (prong 4) in a separate action.
    A Technical Support Document (TSD) is included as part of the
docket to discuss the details of this action, including analysis of how
the SIP meets the applicable 110 requirements for infrastructure SIPs.

II. Have the requirements for approval of a SIP revision been met?

    The state's submission has met the public notice requirements for
the Ozone infrastructure SIP submission in accordance with 40 CFR
51.102. The

state held a public comment period from The MDNR held a public hearing
and comment period from April 30, 2013 to June 06, 2013. EPA provided
comments on May 23, 2013 and were the only commenters. A public hearing
was held on May 30, 2013. The submission satisfied the completeness
criteria of 40 CFR part 51, appendix V for all elements except
110(a)(2)(D)(i)(I)--prongs 1 and 2. EPA published a document in the
Federal Register, ``Findings of Failure to Submit a Section 110 State
Implementation Plan for Interstate Transport for the 2008 National
Ambient Air Quality Standards for Ozone''.\1\ Missouri was included in
this finding because it had not made a complete ``good neighbor'' SIP
submittal to meet the section 110(a)(2)(D)(i)(I)--prongs 1 and 2
elements. As explained in more detail in the TSD, which is part of this
docket, the revision meets the substantive SIP requirements of the CAA,
including section 110 and implementing regulations.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \1\ See 80 FR 39961 (August 12, 2015).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

III. What action is EPA taking?

    EPA is taking direct final action to approve elements of the July
08, 2013, infrastructure SIP submission from the State of Missouri,
which addresses the requirements of CAA sections 110(a)(1) and (2) as
applicable to the 2008 Ozone NAAQS. As stated above, EPA is approving
the revision as meeting the submittal requirement of section 110(a)(1)
and approving the following elements of section 110(a)(2): (A), (B),
(C), (D)(i)(II)--prong 3, (D)(ii), (E) through (H), and (J) through
(M). EPA will act on (D)(i)(II)--prong 4 in a separate action.
    EPA is taking no further action with respect to elements of section
110(a)(2)(D)(i)(I)--prongs 1 and 2--because the Cross State Air
Pollution Rule (CSAPR) Federal Implementation Plans (FIPs) that require
subject units in Missouri to participate in the Federal CSAPR
NOX Annual Trading Program and the Federal CSAPR
SO2 Group 1 Trading Program continue to apply and addresses
emissions from subject units that may be contributing to nonattainment
(prong 1) or interfering with maintenance (prong 2) of the NAAQS in
another state.2 3 Additionally, on June 28, 2016, EPA took
direct final action to approve Missouri's adoption of state regulations
that established state-determined allocations replacing EPA's CSAPR
default annual NOX and annual SO2 emissions
allocation allowances for 2017 and later years as an abbreviated SIP
revision.\4\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \2\ See 76 FR 48208 (August 8, 2011).
    \3\ See 81 FR 74504 (December 27, 2016).
    \4\ See 81 FR 41838 (August 12, 2016).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    EPA is not taking action on section 110(a)(2)(I). Section
110(a)(2)(I) requires that in the case of a plan or plan revision for
areas designated as nonattainment areas, states must meet applicable
requirements of part D of the CAA, relating to SIP requirements for
designated nonattainment areas. EPA does not expect infrastructure SIP
submissions to address element (I). The specific SIP submissions for
designated nonattainment areas, as required under CAA title I, part D,
are subject to different submission schedules than those for section
110 infrastructure elements. EPA will take action on part D attainment
plan SIP submissions through a separate rulemaking governed by the
requirements for nonattainment areas, as described in part D.
    We are publishing this direct final rule without a prior proposed
rule because we view this as a noncontroversial action and anticipate
no adverse comment. However, in the ``Proposed Rules'' section of this
Federal Register, we are publishing a separate document that will serve
as the proposed rule to approve the SIP revision if adverse comments
are received on this direct final rule. We will not institute a second
comment period on this action. Any parties interested in commenting
must do so at this time. For further information about commenting on
this rule, see the ADDRESSES section of this document. If EPA receives
adverse comment, we will publish a timely withdrawal in the Federal
Register informing the public that this direct final rule will not take
effect. We will address all public comments in any subsequent final
rule based on the proposed rule.

IV. Statutory and Executive Order Reviews

    Under the CAA, the Administrator is required to approve a SIP
submission that complies with the provisions of the Act and applicable
Federal regulations. 42 U.S.C. 7410(k); 40 CFR 52.02(a). Thus, in
reviewing SIP submissions, EPA's role is to approve state choices,
provided that they meet the criteria of the CAA. Accordingly, this
action merely approves state law as meeting Federal requirements and
does not impose additional requirements beyond those imposed by state
law. For that reason, this action:
     Is not a significant regulatory action subject to review
by the Office of Management and Budget under Executive Orders 12866 (58
FR 51735, October 4, 1993) and 13563 (76 FR 3821, January 21, 2011);
     Does not impose an information collection burden under the
provisions of the Paperwork Reduction Act (44 U.S.C. 3501 et seq.);
     Is certified as not having a significant economic impact
on a substantial number of small entities under the Regulatory
Flexibility Act (5 U.S.C. 601 et seq.);
     Does not contain any unfunded mandate or significantly or
uniquely affect small governments, as described in the Unfunded
Mandates Reform Act of 1995 (Public Law 104-4);
     Does not have Federalism implications as specified in
Executive Order 13132 (64 FR 43255, August 10, 1999);
     Is not an economically significant regulatory action based
on health or safety risks subject to Executive Order 13045 (62 FR
19885, April 23, 1997);
     Is not a significant regulatory action subject to
Executive Order 13211 (66 FR 28355, May 22, 2001);
     Is not subject to requirements of Section 12(d) of the
National Technology Transfer and Advancement Act of 1995 (15 U.S.C. 272
note) because application of those requirements would be inconsistent
with the CAA; and
     Does not provide EPA with the discretionary authority to
address, as appropriate, disproportionate human health or environmental
effects, using practicable and legally permissible methods, under
Executive Order 12898 (59 FR 7629, February 16, 1994).
    The SIP is not approved to apply on any Indian reservation land or
in any other area where EPA or an Indian tribe has demonstrated that a
tribe has jurisdiction. In those areas of Indian country, the rule does
not have tribal implications and will not impose substantial direct
costs on tribal governments or preempt tribal law as specified by
Executive Order 13175 (65 FR 67249, November 9, 2000).

List of Subjects in 40 CFR Part 52

    Environmental protection, Air pollution control, Incorporation by
reference, Intergovernmental relations, Nitrogen dioxide, Ozone,
Reporting and recordkeeping requirements, Volatile organic compounds.

    Dated: September 21, 2017.
Cathy Stepp,
Acting Regional Administrator, Region 7.

    For the reasons stated in the preamble, EPA is amending 40 CFR part
52 as set forth below:

PART 52--APPROVAL AND PROMULGATION OF IMPLEMENTATION PLANS

0
1. The authority citation for part 52 continues to read as follows:

    Authority:  42 U.S.C. 7401 et seq.

Subpart AA--Missouri

0
2. Amend Sec.  52.1320(e) by adding entry (63) in numerical order to
read as follows:

Sec.  52.1320  Identification of plan.

* * * * *
    (e)* * *

                                                   EPA-Approved Missouri Nonregulatory SIP Provisions
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
    Name of non- regulatory SIP      Applicable geographic       State
              revision               or nonattainment area  submittal date             EPA approval date                         Explanation
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

                                                                      * * * * * * *
(63) Sections 110 (a)(1) and         Statewide............          7/8/13  10/6/17, [Insert Federal Register       This action approves the following
 110(a)(2) Infrastructure                                                    citation].                              CAA elements: 110(a)(1) and
 Requirements for the 2008 Ozone                                                                                110(a)(2)(A), (B), (C), (D)(i)(II)--
 NAAQS.                                                                                prong 3, (D)(ii), (E), (F), (G),
                                                                                (H), (J), (K), (L), and (M).
                                                                                110(a)(2)(D)(i)(I)--prongs 1 and 2
                                                                                are addressed by a Federal
                                                                                Implementation Plan.
                                                                                110(a)(2)(I) is not applicable. [EPA-
                                                                                R07-OAR-2015-0356; FRL-9968-82-
                                                                                Region 7.]

                                                                      * * * * * * *
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

[FR Doc. 2017-21528 Filed 10-5-17; 8:45 am]
 BILLING CODE 6560-50-P


[Federal Register Volume 88, Number 176 (Wednesday, September 13, 2023)]
[Notices]
[Pages 62883-62884]
[FR Doc No: 2023-19753]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION

Federal Motor Carrier Safety Administration

[Docket No. FMCSA-2012-0154; FMCSA-2013-0124; FMCSA-2014-0385; FMCSA-
2016-0002; FMCSA-2018-0138, FMCSA-2020-0027]

Qualification of Drivers; Exemption Applications; Hearing

AGENCY: Federal Motor Carrier Safety Administration (FMCSA), Department
of Transportation (DOT).

ACTION: Notice of final disposition.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: FMCSA announces its decision to renew exemptions for seven
individuals from the hearing requirement in the Federal Motor Carrier
Safety Regulations (FMCSRs) for interstate commercial motor vehicle
(CMV) drivers. The exemptions enable these hard of hearing and deaf
individuals to continue to operate CMVs in interstate commerce.

DATES: The exemptions were applicable on August 13, 2023. The
exemptions expire on August 13, 2025.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Ms. Christine A. Hydock, Chief,
Medical Programs Division, FMCSA, DOT, 1200 New Jersey Avenue SE, Room
W64-224, Washington, DC 20590-0001,<PHONE_NUMBER>,
[email protected]. Office hours are 8:30 a.m. to 5 p.m. ET Monday
through Friday, except Federal holidays. If you have questions
regarding viewing or submitting material to the docket, contact Dockets
Operations,<PHONE_NUMBER>.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

I. Public Participation

A. Viewing Comments

    To view comments go to www.regulations.gov. Insert the docket
number (FMCSA-2012-0154, FMCSA-2013-0124, FMCSA-2014-0385, FMCSA-2016-
0002, FMCSA-2018-0138, or FMCSA-2020-0027) in the keyword box and click
``Search.'' Next, sort the results by ``Posted (Newer-Older),'' choose
the first notice listed, and click ``Browse Comments.'' If you do not
have access to the internet, you may view the docket online by visiting
Dockets Operations on the ground floor of the DOT West Building, 1200
New

Jersey Avenue SE, Washington, DC 20590-0001, between 9 a.m. and 5 p.m.
ET Monday through Friday, except Federal holidays. To be sure someone
is there to help you, please call<PHONE_NUMBER> or<PHONE_NUMBER>
before visiting Dockets Operations.

B. Privacy Act

    In accordance with 49 U.S.C. 31315(b)(6), DOT solicits comments
from the public on the exemption requests. DOT posts these comments,
without edit, including any personal information the commenter
provides, to www.regulations.gov. As described in the system of records
notice DOT/ALL 14 (Federal Docket Management System), which can be
reviewed at https://www.transportation.gov/individuals/privacy/privacy-act-system-records-notices, the comments are searchable by the name of
the submitter.

II. Background

    On August 3, 2023, FMCSA published a notice announcing its decision
to renew exemptions for seven individuals from the hearing standard in
49 CFR 391.41(b)(11) to operate a CMV in interstate commerce and
requested comments from the public (88 FR 51392). The public comment
period ended on September 5, 2023, and no comments were received.
    FMCSA has evaluated the eligibility of these applicants and
determined that renewing these exemptions would likely achieve a level
of safety that is equivalent to, or greater than, the level that would
be achieved by complying with Sec.  391.41(b)(11).
    The physical qualification standard for drivers regarding hearing
found in Sec.  391.41(b)(11) states that a person is physically
qualified to drive a CMV if that person first perceives a forced
whispered voice in the better ear at not less than 5 feet with or
without the use of a hearing aid or, if tested by use of an audiometric
device, does not have an average hearing loss in the better ear greater
than 40 decibels at 500 Hz, 1,000 Hz, and 2,000 Hz with or without a
hearing aid when the audiometric device is calibrated to American
National Standard (formerly ASA Standard) Z24.5--1951.
    This standard was adopted in 1970 and was revised in 1971 to allow
drivers to be qualified under this standard while wearing a hearing aid
(35 FR 6458, 6463 (Apr. 22, 1970) and 36 FR 12857 (July 8, 1971),
respectively).

III. Discussion of Comments

    FMCSA received no comments in this proceeding.

IV. Conclusion

    Based upon its evaluation of the seven renewal exemption
applications, FMCSA announces its decision to exempt the following
drivers from the hearing requirement in Sec.  391.41 (b)(11).
    As of August 13, 2023, and in accordance with 49 U.S.C. 31136(e)
and 31315(b), the following seven individuals have satisfied the
renewal conditions for obtaining an exemption from the hearing
requirement in the FMCSRs for interstate CMV drivers (88 FR 51393):

Jason Clark (MO)
Timothy Finley (CA)
William Jones (MN)
David Presley (TX)
Michael Smith (CO)
Donald Taylor (NC)
Holly Wright, Jr. (NC)

    The drivers were included in docket numbers FMCSA-2012-0154, FMCSA-
2013-0124, FMCSA-2014-0385, FMCSA-2016-0002, FMCSA-2018-0138, or FMCSA-
2020-0027. Their exemptions were applicable as of August 13, 2023 and
will expire on August 13, 2025.
    In accordance with 49 U.S.C. 31315(b), each exemption will be valid
for 2 years from the effective date unless revoked earlier by FMCSA.
The exemption will be revoked if the following occurs: (1) the person
fails to comply with the terms and conditions of the exemption; (2) the
exemption has resulted in a lower level of safety than was maintained
prior to being granted; or (3) continuation of the exemption would not
be consistent with the goals and objectives of 49 U.S.C. 31136, 49
U.S.C. chapter 313, or the FMCSRs.

Larry W. Minor,
Associate Administrator for Policy.
[FR Doc. 2023-19753 Filed 9-12-23; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910-EX-P


[Federal Register: October 15, 2010 (Volume 75, Number 199)]
[Notices]
[Page 63540]
[DOCID:fr15oc10-160]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION

Federal Aviation Administration

Request for Public Comment, Morgantown Municipal Airport,
Morgantown, WV

AGENCY: Federal Aviation Administration (FAA), DOT.

ACTION: Request for public comment.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Federal Aviation Administration is requesting public
comment on the proposed release of 46.53 acres of land currently owned
by the City of Morgantown, Sponsor for the Morgantown Municipal
Airport, Morgantown, West Virginia. The parcel is located within the
Sixth Ward District of the City of Morgantown, Morgantown, West
Virginia. The site is a 47.00 acre portion of the larger Morgantown
Municipal Airport property. The land is currently being used as a cross
wind runway. It has been determined that this runway is no longer
needed for safety or capacity. The property is not a vital part of, or
necessary for the Sponsor's operation and development of the Morgantown
Airport. Once released, the land will change to a non-aeronautical use
and will be transferred to the West Virginia Army National Guard (``AR-
WVARNG''). Thereafter, AR-WVARNG will construct or cause the
construction of and operate a West Virginia Army National Guard
Readiness Center on the property. The development of this property will
also bring the construction of a roadway and utilities that will be
needed for subsequent development of aviation facilities on a part of
the airport that is now remote and without utilities or access. The
airport land being released is not needed for airport development as
shown on the Airport Layout Plan. Fair Market Value has been determined
based upon an appraisal of the Property.

DATES: Comments must be received on or before November 15, 2010.

ADDRESSES: Comments on this application may be mailed or delivered in
triplicate to the FAA at the following address: Connie Boley-Lilly,
Program Specialist, Federal Aviation Administration, Beckley Airports
Field Office, 176 Airport Circle, Room 101, Beaver, West Virginia
25813.

    In addition, one copy of any comments submitted to the FAA must be
mailed or delivered to Dan Boroff, City Manager of the City of
Morgantown, Sponsor of Morgantown Municipal Airport at the following
address: Dan Boroff, City Manager, City of Morgantown, Sponsor for
Morgantown Municipal Airport, 389 Spruce Street, Morgantown, West
Virginia 26505.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Connie Boley-Lilly, Program
Specialist, Beckley Airport Field Office,<PHONE_NUMBER> ext. 125, FAX
(304) 253-8028.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The FAA proposes to rule and invites public
comment on the request to release property at the Morgantown Municipal
Airport, Morgantown, WV. Under the provisions of AIR 21 (49 U.S.C.
47108 (h)(2)).
    The Morgantown Municipal Airport is proposing the release of
approximately 46.53 acres of fee simple release to accommodate the
construction of a West Virginia Army National Guard Readiness Center on
the property. The crosswind runway, currently occupying the property,
has been determined to be no longer need for safety and capacity at the
airport. The release and sale of this property will allow the Sponsor
to develop the roadway and utilities which will benefit this property,
the hangar site, and the landside development site. This release will
enhance the development of private aviation and commercial development
of the east side of the airport.

    Issued in Beckley, West Virginia, on October 1, 2010.
Matthew P. DiGiulian,
Manager, Beckley Airport Field Office, Eastern Region.
[FR Doc. 2010-25980 Filed 10-14-10; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910-13-P