[Federal Register Volume 84, Number 143 (Thursday, July 25, 2019)]
[Notices]
[Pages 35907-35910]
[FR Doc No: 2019-15778]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

[Release No. 34-86419; File No. SR-CboeBZX-2019-066]

Self-Regulatory Organizations; Cboe BZX Exchange, Inc.; Notice of
Filing and Immediate Effectiveness of a Proposed Rule Change Relating
To Update Rule 16.1 To Include the Definition of Capacity, as Well as
Amend Its Fee Schedule To Reflect This Update

July 19, 2019.
    Pursuant to Section 19(b)(1) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934
(the ``Act''),\1\ and Rule 19b-4 thereunder,\2\ notice is hereby given
that on July 17, 2019, Cboe BZX Exchange, Inc. (the ``Exchange'' or
``BZX'') filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the
``Commission'') the proposed rule change as described in Items I, II,
and III below, which Items have been prepared by the Exchange. The
Exchange filed the proposal as a ``non-controversial'' proposed rule
change pursuant to Section 19(b)(3)(A)(iii) of the Act \3\ and Rule
19b-4(f)(6) thereunder.\4\ The Commission is publishing this notice to
solicit

comments on the proposed rule change from interested persons.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \1\ 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(1).
    \2\ 17 CFR 240.19b-4.
    \3\ 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(3)(A)(iii).
    \4\ 17 CFR 240.19b-4(f)(6).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

I. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement of the Terms of Substance
of the Proposed Rule Change

    Cboe BZX Exchange, Inc. (the ``Exchange'' or ``BZX Options'')
proposes to update Rule 16.1 to include the definition of capacity, as
well as amend its fee schedule to reflect this update. The text of the
proposed rule change is provided in Exhibit 5.
    The text of the proposed rule change is also available on the
Exchange's website (http://markets.cboe.com/us/equities/regulation/rule_filings/bzx/), at the Exchange's Office of the Secretary, and at
the Commission's Public Reference Room.

II. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement of the Purpose of, and
Statutory Basis for, the Proposed Rule Change

    In its filing with the Commission, the Exchange included statements
concerning the purpose of and basis for the proposed rule change and
discussed any comments it received on the proposed rule change. The
text of these statements may be examined at the places specified in
Item IV below. The Exchange has prepared summaries, set forth in
sections A, B, and C below, of the most significant aspects of such
statements.

A. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement of the Purpose of, and
Statutory Basis for, the Proposed Rule Change

1. Purpose
    The Exchange proposes to add ``capacity'' as a defined term under
Rule 16.1 (Definitions). The proposed change intends to codify the
definition of capacity in it rules, which is currently referenced in
its technical specifications \5\ and in certain rules.\6\ This proposed
change is also a harmonizing change intended to conform to the capacity
definition under the rules of its affiliated exchange, Cboe C2
Exchange, Inc. (``C2''). The Exchange also proposes to update a term
under Rule 20.7(Audit Trail) to reflect the proposed capacity
definition. In addition to this, the Exchange proposes to conform
certain definitions under its fee schedule to this proposed definition.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \5\ See Cboe Options Exchanges Binary Order Entry Specification,
available at http://cdn.batstrading.com/resources/membership/US_Options_BOE_Specification.pdf.
    \6\ See Rule 18.2, Rule 20.7(b), and Rule 21.10.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    Currently, the System \7\ allows for a User to mark its order with
various capacity codes which correspond to the capacity of the User
(i.e., a customer, a Market Maker, etc.),\8\ and, pursuant to current
Exchange Rules, Users are required to submit orders with the proper
capacity identification.\9\ The current Exchange Rules, however, do not
provide for a specific definition of the capacity in which a User may
submit an order nor for the corresponding codes for different User
capacity types. Additionally, the current fee schedule provides that a
Member's transaction is assigned a fee code and defines the various
types (i.e., capacity type) of Members to which the corresponding fee
codes are assigned. Specifically, the Member type definitions apply to
any transaction identified by such Member. For example, ``Market
Maker'' applies to any transaction identified by a Member for clearing
in the Market Maker range at the OCC, where such Member is registered
with the Exchange as a Market Maker.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \7\ The automated trading system used by BZX Options for the
trading of options contracts. See Rule 16.1.
    \8\ See Cboe Options Exchanges Binary Order Entry Specification,
available at http://cdn.batstrading.com/resources/membership/US_Options_BOE_Specification.pdf.
    \9\ See Rule 20.7.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    The Exchange now proposes to amend Rule 16.1 to codify the
definition of ``capacity''. The Exchange proposes to define
``capacity'' to mean the capacity in which a User submits an order,
which the User specifies by applying the corresponding code to the
order. The proposed corresponding codes and capacity types include:
``B'' to an order for the account of a broker dealer, including a
foreign broker dealer; ``C'' to an order for the account of a Priority
Customer; ``F'' to an order for the proprietary account of an OCC
clearing member firm; ``J'' to an order for a joint back office
account; ``M'' to an order for the account of a registered Market
Maker; ``N'' to an order for the account of a market maker, i.e., an
Away Market Maker; and ``U'' to an order for the account of a
Professional.\10\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \10\ See Rule 16.1(a)(47) (proposed Rule 16.1). A Professional
means any person or entity that is not a broker or dealer in
securities and places more than 390 orders in listed options per day
on average during a calendar month for its own beneficial
account(s). All Professional orders shall be appropriately marked by
Options Members.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    This definition is substantially similar to that of the definition
under C2 Rule 1.1. The Exchange notes only slight differences between
its proposed rule and that of its affiliated exchange, C2. First, the
Exchange provides that capacity code ``C'' applies to orders for the
account of a Priority Customer, whereas capacity code ``C'' under C2
Rule 1.1 applies to orders for the account of Public Customer. This
difference accounts for the fact that C2 does not have a defined term
for Priority Customer, which pursuant to Rule 16.1, means any person or
entity that is not a broker or dealer in securities or a Professional.
The Exchange believes that incorporating this term, as opposed to
Public Customer, maintains consistency with the Exchange's fee
schedule, which already excludes Professionals from the definition of
the term Customer for purposes of pricing on the Exchange, and provides
that Professional capacity types are to be separately marked as such.
Second, the Exchange provides that capacity code ``N'' is assigned to
an order for the account of a market maker on another options exchange,
and is otherwise known as an Away Market Maker. C2 does not provide in
its definition that this capacity type is otherwise known as an Away
Market Maker. The Exchange's fee schedule currently defines Away Market
Maker to mean the same as this proposed rule definition. Therefore, the
Exchange believes that incorporating this language is a non-substantive
addition that does not alter the capacity type definition attached to
capacity code ``N'' in any way, but rather maintains consistency with
the Exchange's fee schedule. The Exchange also notes that it does not
add capacity code ``L'' like that of C2 for non-trading permit holder
affiliates as this capacity code is only applicable to participants on
C2.\11\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \11\ See supra note 5.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    In addition to this, the proposed rule change alphabetizes the
defined terms in Rule 16.1 and removes the paragraph lettering to
conform to the format of C2 Rule 1.1 for its definitions.
    The Exchange also proposes to update Rule 20.7 (Audit Trail) to
reflect the proposed capacity definition under Rule 16.1(a).
Specifically, current Rule 20.7(b) provides that order records relating
to BZX Options must contain certain information, including Member
capacity pursuant to subparagraph (b)(6). The Exchange now proposes to
update subparagraph (b)(6) to User capacity, which is in line with the
proposed capacity definition under proposed Rule 16.1.
    The Exchange also proposes to update the capacity type definitions
of ``Away Market Maker'', ``Customer'', ``Firm'', ``Joint Back
Office'', Market Maker'' and ``Professional'' in its fee schedule to
reflect the proposed capacity definition and types under proposed Rule
16.1.

Specifically, the Exchange notes the proposed change to the current
language providing that the capacity types apply to transactions
identified by a Member for clearing in the respective capacity type
range at the OCC. The Exchange updates this language to provide that
the defined capacity types apply to orders for the account of the
respective capacity type.\12\ This change reflects the proposed
capacity type definitions under proposed Rule 16.1 and is in line with
the capacity codes applicable to participants on the Exchange's
affiliated exchange, C2. The Exchange also believes that changing the
definition of the capacity types to apply to an order for the account
of the respective capacity types better aligns with the order
identification requirements under Rule 20.7. Under Rule 20.7 a Member
must submit proper order information when entering orders and maintain
Customer order records that must contain, among other things, User
capacity (as proposed). The Exchange believes that codifying in the
Rules the codes that Users must apply to orders for the accounts of the
various capacity types will provide additional transparency to Members
regarding the appropriate order marking requirements.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \12\ Though the Exchange proposes to remove the OCC clearing
range language in order to better align these fee schedule
definitions with those under proposed 16.1 and C2 Rule 1.1, this
does not alter the manner in which each capacity type clears at the
OCC.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

2. Statutory Basis
    The Exchange believes the proposed rule change is consistent with
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (the ``Act'') and the rules and
regulations thereunder applicable to the Exchange and, in particular,
the requirements of Section 6(b) of the Act.\13\ Specifically, the
Exchange believes the proposed rule change is consistent with the
Section 6(b)(5) \14\ requirements that the rules of an exchange be
designed to prevent fraudulent and manipulative acts and practices, to
promote just and equitable principles of trade, to foster cooperation
and coordination with persons engaged in regulating, clearing,
settling, processing information with respect to, and facilitating
transactions in securities, to remove impediments to and perfect the
mechanism of a free and open market and a national market system, and,
in general, to protect investors and the public interest. Additionally,
the Exchange believes the proposed rule change is consistent with the
Section 6(b)(5) \15\ requirement that the rules of an exchange not be
designed to permit unfair discrimination between customers, issuers,
brokers, or dealers.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \13\ 15 U.S.C. 78f(b).
    \14\ 15 U.S.C. 78f(b)(5).
    \15\ Id.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    In particular, the Exchange believes that the proposed change to
adopt the definition of capacity, including types and codes, will
remove impediments to and perfect the mechanism of a free and open
market and a national market system by providing Users with rules that
accurately reflect and add detail to current System capacity code
specifications for which a User must use to appropriately mark its
orders. As a result, the proposed change will help facilitate
understanding of and compliance with the rules. In addition to this,
the Exchange believes that by harmonizing the definition of capacity
types and codes, as well as the format of all BZX Options definitions,
with that of its affiliated exchange, C2, will result in increased
understanding of the Exchange's Rules and that of its affiliated
exchange rules for those participating across the two affiliated
exchanges.
    Additionally, the Exchange believes that the proposed change to
reflect the proposed capacity definition throughout the corresponding
definitions in the fee schedule will provide Members with clearer
definitions of capacity types that will better align with the Exchange
Rules as well as provide detail to the System specifications already in
place. As a result, the proposed change will mitigate any confusion
surrounding the fee schedule capacity definitions and applicable codes.
As such, increased User understanding of the Exchange's fee schedule
definitions as they correspond to the Exchange Rules will serve to
remove impediments to and perfect the mechanism of a free and open
market, and thereby protect investors. Likewise, the Exchange believes
that the proposed change to Rule 20.7(b)(6) to more accurately reflect
the proposed definition of capacity will also serve to remove
impediments to and perfect the mechanism of a free and open market by
aligning the Exchange Rules, in turn bolstering Member understanding,
and thus, facilitating less burdensome regulatory compliance with the
audit trail rules.

B. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement on Burden on Competition

    The Exchange does not believe that the proposed rule change will
impose any burden on competition that is not necessary or appropriate
in furtherance of the purposes of the Act. The Exchange notes that the
proposed rule change is not designed to address any competitive issues
but is only intended to provide clarity with respect to the definition
of capacity types and consistency throughout its Rules and fee schedule
with respect to capacity codes. The Exchange does not believe that the
proposed change will impose any burden on intramarket competition that
is not necessary or appropriate in furtherance of the purposes of the
Act because all Users are already required to submit orders with the
appropriate capacity code, and the same capacity codes are available to
all Members. The Exchange also believes that the proposed rule change
reduces the regulatory compliance burden on all Members by better
aligning the Rules and fee schedule with the existing audit trail
requirements. Moreover, the Exchange does not believe that the proposed
change will impose any burden on intermarket competition that is not
necessary or appropriate in furtherance of the purposes of the Act. As
noted, the proposed rule change is not intended as a competitive
change, but rather to provide Members with added detail and clarity
regarding the capacity codes applicable to their orders submitted to
the Exchange.

C. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement on Comments on the Proposed
Rule Change Received From Members, Participants, or Others

    The Exchange neither solicited nor received comments on the
proposed rule change.

III. Date of Effectiveness of the Proposed Rule Change and Timing for
Commission Action

    Because the proposed rule change does not (i) significantly affect
the protection of investors or the public interest; (ii) impose any
significant burden on competition; and (iii) become operative for 30
days from the date on which it was filed, or such shorter time as the
Commission may designate if consistent with the protection of investors
and the public interest, the proposed rule change has become effective
pursuant to Section 19(b)(3)(A) of the Act \16\ and Rule 19b-4(f)(6)
thereunder.\17\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \16\ 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(3)(A).
    \17\ 17 CFR 240.19b-4(f)(6). In addition, Rule 19b-4(f)(6)(iii)
requires a self-regulatory organization to give the Commission
written notice of its intent to file the proposed rule change at
least five business days prior to the date of filing of the proposed
rule change, or such shorter time as designated by the Commission.
The Exchange has satisfied this requirement.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    At any time within 60 days of the filing of the proposed rule
change, the

Commission summarily may temporarily suspend such rule change if it
appears to the Commission that such action is necessary or appropriate
in the public interest, for the protection of investors, or otherwise
in furtherance of the purposes of the Act. If the Commission takes such
action, the Commission shall institute proceedings to determine whether
the proposed rule change should be approved or disapproved.

IV. Solicitation of Comments

    Interested persons are invited to submit written data, views, and
arguments concerning the foregoing, including whether the proposed rule
change is consistent with the Act. Comments may be submitted by any of
the following methods:

Electronic Comments

     Use the Commission's internet comment form (http://www.sec.gov/rules/sro.shtml); or
     Send an email to<EMAIL_ADDRESS>Please include
File Number SR-CboeBZX-2019-066 on the subject line.

Paper Comments

     Send paper comments in triplicate to Secretary, Securities
and Exchange Commission, 100 F Street NE, Washington, DC 20549-1090.

All submissions should refer to File Number SR-CboeBZX-2019-066. This
file number should be included on the subject line if email is used. To
help the Commission process and review your comments more efficiently,
please use only one method. The Commission will post all comments on
the Commission's internet website (http://www.sec.gov/rules/sro.shtml).
Copies of the submission, all subsequent amendments, all written
statements with respect to the proposed rule change that are filed with
the Commission, and all written communications relating to the proposed
rule change between the Commission and any person, other than those
that may be withheld from the public in accordance with the provisions
of 5 U.S.C. 552, will be available for website viewing and printing in
the Commission's Public Reference Room, 100 F Street NE, Washington, DC
20549, on official business days between the hours of 10:00 a.m. and
3:00 p.m. Copies of the filing also will be available for inspection
and copying at the principal office of the Exchange. All comments
received will be posted without change.
    Persons submitting comments are cautioned that we do not redact or
edit personal identifying information from comment submissions. You
should submit only information that you wish to make available
publicly. All submissions should refer to File Number SR-CboeBZX-2019-
066 and should be submitted on or before August 15, 2019.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \18\ 17 CFR 200.30-3(a)(12).

    For the Commission, by the Division of Trading and Markets,
pursuant to delegated authority.\18\
Jill M. Peterson,
Assistant Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2019-15778 Filed 7-24-19; 8:45 am]
 BILLING CODE 8011-01-P


[Federal Register: February 2, 2007 (Volume 72, Number 22)]
[Notices]
[Page 5042-5043]
[DOCID:fr02fe07-51]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission

[Docket No. CP06-449-000]

Kinder Morgan Louisiana Pipeline LLC; Notice of Availability of
the Draft Environmental Impact Statement for the Proposed Kinder Morgan
Louisiana Pipeline Project

January 26, 2007.
    The staff of the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission (FERC or
Commission) has prepared a draft Environmental Impact Statement (EIS)
on the natural gas pipeline facilities proposed by Kinder Morgan
Louisiana Pipeline LLC (KMLP) in the above-referenced docket.
    The draft EIS was prepared to satisfy the requirements of the
National Environmental Policy Act. The staff concludes that approval of
the proposed project with the appropriate mitigating measures as
recommended, would have limited adverse environmental impact. The draft
EIS also evaluates alternatives to the proposal, including system
alternatives, major route alternatives, and route variations, and
requests comments on them.
    The draft EIS addresses the potential environmental effects of the
construction and operation of the following facilities in southwest
Louisiana:
     Leg 1--132 miles of 42-inch-diameter pipeline beginning
within the Sabine Pass Liquefied Natural Gas (LNG) Terminal in Cameron
Parish and extending northward and easterly through Calcasieu,
Jefferson Davis, and Acadia Parishes until it connects with an existing
Columbia Gulf Transmission interstate pipeline in Evangeline Parish,
Louisiana.
     Leg 2--1.22 miles of 36-inch-diameter pipeline beginning
within the Sabine Pass LNG Terminal and extending to a point of
interconnection with the existing Natural Gas Pipeline Company of
America pipeline just south of State Highway 82 in Cameron Parish,
Louisiana.
     The Florida Gas Transmission (FGT) Lateral--2.3 miles of
24-inch-diameter pipeline extending eastwardly from Leg 1 at
approximately milepost 110.60 until it connects with the existing FGT
Company's Compressor Station No. 7 near the town of Williams in Acadia
Parish, Louisiana.
     Associated mainline block valves, metering, tie-in, and
pigging facilities.
    The purpose of the proposed facilities is to deliver at least
3,395,000 decatherms (Dth) per day of regasified natural gas from the
Sabine Pass LNG Terminal into the national pipeline and underground
storage grid.

Specific Comment Request

    The staff has identified and evaluated in detail two system
alternatives, four major route alternatives, and 15 route variations.
The staff concludes that the proposed system and route are
environmentally least damaging, and therefore prefers the proposed
system and route. Any route variation considered to be an environmental
improvement has been incorporated into the proposed route. Area
residents, local or state governments, intervenors, Kinder Morgan, and
other interested parties are asked to provide specific comments on our
analysis of alternatives. Comments should also address any effect on
project timing and related cost/benefits.

Comment Procedures and Public Meetings

    Any person wishing to comment on the draft EIS may do so. To ensure
consideration prior to a Commission decision on the proposal, it is
important that we receive your comments before the date specified
below.
    Please note that the Commission strongly encourages electronic
filing of any comments or interventions or protests to this proceeding.
See 18 CFR 385.2001(a)(1)(iii) and the instructions on the Commission's
Web site at http: //http://www.ferc.gov under the ``e-Filing'' link and the

link to the User's Guide. Before you can file comments you will need to
create a free account which can be created online.
    If you are filing written comments, please carefully follow these
instructions to ensure that your comments are received in time and
properly recorded:
     Send an original and two copies of your comments to:
Magalie R. Salas, Secretary, Federal Energy Regulatory Commission, 888
First Street, NE., Room 1A, Washington, DC 20426.
     Label one copy of your comments for the attention of Gas
Branch 2, DG2E;
     Reference Docket No. CP06-449-000 on the original and both
copies; and
     Mail your comments so that they will be received in
Washington, DC on or before March 19, 2007.
    We will announce in a future notice, the location and time of two
local public meetings to receive comments on the draft EIS. These
meetings will be posted on the Commission's calendar located at http://www.ferc.gov/EventCalendar/EventsList.aspx
 along with other related

information.
    After these comments are reviewed, any significant new issues are
investigated, and modifications are made to the draft EIS, a final EIS
will be published and distributed by the staff. The final EIS will
contain the staff's responses to timely comments filed on the draft
EIS.
    Comments will be considered by the Commission but will not serve to
make the commentor a party to the proceeding. Any person seeking to
become a party to the proceeding must file a motion to intervene
pursuant to Rule 214 of the Commission's Rules of Practice and
Procedures (18 CFR 385.214).
    Anyone may intervene in this proceeding based on this draft EIS.
You must file your request to intervene as specified above.\1\ You do
not need intervenor status to have your comments considered.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \1\ Interventions may also be filed electronically via the
Internet in lieu of paper. See the previous discussion on filing
comments electronically.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    The draft EIS has been placed in the public files of the FERC and
is available for distribution and public inspection at: Federal Energy
Regulatory Commission, Public Reference Room, 888 First Street, NE.,
Room 2A, Washington, DC 20426,<PHONE_NUMBER>.
    A limited number of copies are available from the Public Reference
Room identified above. In addition, copies of the draft EIS have been
mailed to federal, state and local agencies, public interest groups,
individuals who have requested the draft EIS, newspapers, and parties
to this proceeding.
    Additional information about the project is available from the
Commission's Office of External Affairs, at 1-866-208-FERC or on the
FERC Internet Web site (http://www.ferc.gov) using the eLibrary link.

Click on the eLibrary link, click on ``General Search'' and enter the
docket number excluding the last three digits in the Docket

Number field. Be sure you have selected an appropriate date range. For
assistance, please contact FERC Online Support at
<EMAIL_ADDRESS>or toll free at 1-866-208-3676, or for TTY,

contact<PHONE_NUMBER>. The eLibrary link also provides access to the
texts of formal documents issued by the Commission, such as orders,
notices, and rulemakings.
    In addition, the Commission now offers a free service called
eSubscription which allows you to keep track of all formal issuances
and submittals in specific dockets. This can reduce the amount of time
you spend researching proceedings by automatically providing you with
notification of these filings, document summaries, and direct links to
the documents. Go to http://www.ferc.gov/esubscribenow.htm.

Magalie R. Salas,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. E7-1669 Filed 2-1-07; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 6717-01-P


[Federal Register Volume 81, Number 70 (Tuesday, April 12, 2016)]
[Notices]
[Page 21645]
[FR Doc No: 2016-08320]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION

Federal Aviation Administration

[Summary Notice No. PE-2016-0035]

Petition for Exemption; Summary of Petition Received; Invictus
Technical Solutions LLC

AGENCY: Federal Aviation Administration (FAA), DOT.

ACTION: Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: This notice contains a summary of a petition seeking relief
from specified requirements of title 14 of the Code of Federal
Regulations. The purpose of this notice is to improve the public's
awareness of, and participation in, the FAA's exemption process.
Neither publication of this notice nor the inclusion or omission of
information in the summary is intended to affect the legal status of
the petition or its final disposition.

DATES: Comments on this petition must identify the petition docket
number and must be received on or before May 2, 2016.

ADDRESSES: Send comments identified by docket number FAA-2015-4805
using any of the following methods:
     Federal eRulemaking Portal: Go to http://www.regulations.gov and follow the online instructions for sending your
comments electronically.
     Mail: Send comments to Docket Operations, M-30; U.S.
Department of Transportation (DOT), 1200 New Jersey Avenue SE., Room
W12-140, West Building Ground Floor, Washington, DC 20590-0001.
     Hand Delivery or Courier: Take comments to Docket
Operations in Room W12-140 of the West Building Ground Floor at 1200
New Jersey Avenue SE., Washington, DC, between 9 a.m. and 5 p.m.,
Monday through Friday, except Federal holidays.
     Fax: Fax comments to Docket Operations at<PHONE_NUMBER>.
    Privacy: In accordance with 5 U.S.C. 553(c), DOT solicits comments
from the public to better inform its rulemaking process. DOT posts
these comments, without edit, including any personal information the
commenter provides, to http://www.regulations.gov, as described in the
system of records notice (DOT/ALL-14 FDMS), which can be reviewed at
http://www.dot.gov/privacy.
    Docket: Background documents or comments received may be read at
http://www.regulations.gov at any time. Follow the online instructions
for accessing the docket or go to the Docket Operations in Room W12-140
of the West Building Ground Floor at 1200 New Jersey Avenue SE.,
Washington, DC, between 9 a.m. and 5 p.m., Monday through Friday,
except Federal holidays.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Joshua Parker<PHONE_NUMBER>, Office
of Rulemaking, Federal Aviation Administration, 800 Independence Avenue
SW., Washington, DC 20591.
    This notice is published pursuant to 14 CFR 11.85.

    Issued in Washington, DC.
James M. Crotty,
Acting Director, Office of Rulemaking.

Petition for Exemption

    Docket No.: FAA-2015-4805.
    Petitioner: Invictus Technical Solutions LLC.
    Section(s) of 14 CFR Affected: Sec. Sec.  91.417(a)(b);
91.409(a)(1)(2); 91.407(a)(1); 91.405(a); 91.151(a)(1); 91.121;
91.119(c); 91.7(a); 61.315(a); 61.113(a); 61.101(e)(4)(5); 61.23(a)(c).
    Description of Relief Sought: The petitioner is requesting release
of objects/dispensing of materials by small, unmanned aircraft in
commercial operations only within U.S. airspace.

[FR Doc. 2016-08320 Filed 4-11-16; 8:45 am]
 BILLING CODE 4910-13-P