[Federal Register: January 12, 2006 (Volume 71, Number 8)]
[Notices]
[Page 2070-2071]
[DOCID:fr12ja06-100]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

Issuer Delisting; Notice of Application of Mercury Air Group,
Inc. To Withdraw Its Common Stock, $.01 Par Value, From Listing and
Registration on the American Stock Exchange LLC File No. 1-07134

January 5, 2006.
    On December 13, 2005, Mercury Air Group, Inc., a Delaware
corporation (``Issuer''), filed an application with the Securities and
Exchange Commission (``Commission''), pursuant to Section 12(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (``Act'') \1\ and Rule 12d2-2(d)
thereunder,\2\ to withdraw its common stock, $.01 par value
(``Security''), from listing and registration on the American Stock
Exchange LLC (``Amex'').
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \1\ 15 U.S.C. 78l(d).
    \2\ 17 CFR 240.12d2-2(d).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    On September 16, 2005, the Board of Directors (``Board'') of the
Issuer unanimously approved resolutions to withdraw the Security from
listing and registration on Amex. The Issuer stated that the Board is
taking such action for the following reasons: (i) To eliminate the
costs of compliance with Section 404 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act and
related regulations estimated to be up to $3,000,000 through June 30,
2007 and approximately $500,000 per year thereafter; (ii) to reduce the
limited time that management and other employees will have to spend to
implement the Section 404 internal controls certificate provisions of
the Sarbanes-Oxley Act, thus enabling them to devote more of their time
and energy to the Issuer's strategy and operations.
    The Issuer stated in its application that it has met the
requirements of Amex Rule 18 by complying with all applicable laws in
effect in the State of Delaware, in which it is incorporated, and
providing written notice of withdrawal to Amex.
    The Issuer's application relates solely to withdrawal of the
Security from listing on the Amex and from registration under Section
12(b) of the Act.\3\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \3\ 15 U.S.C. 78l(b).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    Any interested person may, on or before January 31, 2006 comment on
the facts bearing upon whether the application has been made in
accordance with the rules of Amex, and what terms, if any, should be
imposed by the Commission for the protection of investors. All comment
letters may be submitted by either of the following methods.

Electronic Comments

     Use the Commission's Internet comment form (http://www.sec.gov/rules/delist.shtml.
); or     Send an e-mail to<EMAIL_ADDRESS>Please include

the File Number 1-07134 or;

Paper Comments

     Send paper comments in triplicate to Nancy M. Morris,
Secretary, Securities and Exchange Commission, 100 F Street, NE.,
Washington, DC 20549-9303.

All submissions should refer to File Number 1-07134. This file number
should be included on the subject line if e-mail is used. To help us
process and review your comments more efficiently, please use only one
method. The Commission will post all comments on the Commission's
Internet Web site (http://www.sec.gov/rules/delist.shtml). Comments are

also available for public inspection and copying in the Commission's
Public Reference Room. All comments received will be posted without
change; we do not edit personal identifying information from
submissions. You should submit only information that you wish to make
available publicly.
    The Commission, based on the information submitted to it, will
issue an order granting the application after the date mentioned above,
unless the Commission determines to order a hearing on the matter.

    For the Commission, by the Division of Market Regulation,
pursuant to delegated authority.\4\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \4\ 17 CFR 200.30-3(a)(1).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

Nancy M. Morris,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. E6-195 Filed 1-11-06; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 8010-01-P


MEMORANDUM  SEQ CHAPTER \h \r 1

DATE:		July 29, 2015

TO:		Clean Power Plan for Existing Power Plants; Docket Id: OAR–2013-0602

FROM:		Lora Strine, EPA

SUBJECT:	July 22, 2015 Phone Call Regarding Proposed Clean Power Plan for Existing Power Plants

SUMMARY

A phone call was held between EPA and Gabe Pacyniak, GCC on July 22, 2015 to discuss the proposed Clean Power Plan for Existing Power Plants. The Clean Power Plan for Existing Power Plants was proposed on June 2, 2014.

ATTENDEES

Georgetown Climate Center

Gabe Pacyniak

US EPA

Lora Strine

Jeremy Tarr


[Federal Register Volume 82, Number 163 (Thursday, August 24, 2017)]
[Notices]
[Page 40150]
[FR Doc No: 2017-17950]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission

Combined Notice of Filings #2

    Take notice that the Commission received the following exempt
wholesale generator filings:

    Docket Numbers: EG17-140-000.
    Applicants: Middle Daisy, LLC.
    Description: Self-Certification of EG of Middle Daisy, LLC.
    Filed Date: 8/17/17.
    Accession Number: 20170817-5129.
    Comments Due: 5 p.m. ET 9/7/17.

    Docket Numbers: EG17-141-000.
    Applicants: Shoreham Solar Commons LLC.
    Description: Notice of Self-Certification of Exempt Wholesale
Generator Status of Shoreham Solar Commons LLC.
    Filed Date: 8/18/17.
    Accession Number: 20170818-5135.
    Comments Due: 5 p.m. ET 9/8/17.

    Docket Numbers: EG17-142-000.
    Applicants: Shoreham Solar Commons Holdings LLC.
    Description: Notice of Self-Certification of Exempt Wholesale
Generator Status of Shoreham Solar Commons Holdings LLC.
    Filed Date: 8/18/17.
    Accession Number: 20170818-5137.
    Comments Due: 5 p.m. ET 9/8/17.

    Docket Numbers: EG17-143-000.
    Applicants: Golden Hills North Wind, LLC.
    Description: Notice of Self-Certification of Exempt Wholesale
Generator Status of Golden Hills North Wind, LLC.
    Filed Date: 8/18/17.
    Accession Number: 20170818-5140.
    Comments Due: 5 p.m. ET 9/8/17.

    Take notice that the Commission received the following electric
rate filings:

    Docket Numbers: ER16-2217-000.
    Applicants: Logan Generating Company, L.P.
    Description: Report Filing: Refund Report to be effective N/A.
    Filed Date: 8/18/17.
    Accession Number: 20170818-5126.
    Comments Due: 5 p.m. ET 9/8/17.

    Docket Numbers: ER17-2334-000.
    Applicants: New York Independent System Operator, Inc., Niagara
Mohawk Power Corporation.
    Description: Sec.  205(d) Rate Filing: Joint filing of an executed
LGIA among NYISO, NMPC and Arkwright Summit Wind Far to be effective 8/
10/2017.
    Filed Date: 8/18/17.
    Accession Number: 20170818-5092.
    Comments Due: 5 p.m. ET 9/8/17.

    Docket Numbers: ER17-2335-000.
    Applicants: PJM Interconnection, L.L.C.
    Description: Sec.  205(d) Rate Filing: Original Service Agreement
No. 4762, Queue No. AC1-018 to be effective 7/19/2017.
    Filed Date: 8/18/17.
    Accession Number: 20170818-5129.
    Comments Due: 5 p.m. ET 9/8/17.

    Docket Numbers: ER17-2336-000.
    Applicants: Shoreham Solar Commons LLC.
    Description: Baseline eTariff Filing: Application for Market-Based
Rate Authorization to be effective 10/18/2017.
    Filed Date: 8/18/17.
    Accession Number: 20170818-5136.
    Comments Due: 5 p.m. ET 9/8/17.

    Docket Numbers: ER17-2337-000.
    Applicants: Shoreham Solar Commons Holdings LLC.
    Description: Baseline eTariff Filing: Application for Market-Based
Rate Authorization to be effective 10/18/2017.
    Filed Date: 8/18/17.
    Accession Number: 20170818-5138.
    Comments Due: 5 p.m. ET 9/8/17.

    The filings are accessible in the Commission's eLibrary system by
clicking on the links or querying the docket number.
    Any person desiring to intervene or protest in any of the above
proceedings must file in accordance with Rules 211 and 214 of the
Commission's Regulations (18 CFR 385.211 and 385.214) on or before 5:00
p.m. Eastern time on the specified comment date. Protests may be
considered, but intervention is necessary to become a party to the
proceeding.
    eFiling is encouraged. More detailed information relating to filing
requirements, interventions, protests, service, and qualifying
facilities filings can be found at: http://www.ferc.gov/docs-filing/efiling/filing-req.pdf. For other information, call<PHONE_NUMBER>
(toll free). For TTY, call<PHONE_NUMBER>.

    Dated: August 18, 2017.
Nathaniel J. Davis, Sr.,
Deputy Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2017-17950 Filed 8-23-17; 8:45 am]
 BILLING CODE 6717-01-P


[Federal Register: September 28, 2007 (Volume 72, Number 188)]
[Notices]
[Page 55207-55208]
[DOCID:fr28se07-87]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY

[FRL-8474-5; Docket ID No. EPA-HQ-ORD-2006-0260]

Draft Integrated Science Assessment for Sulfur Oxides Health
Criteria

AGENCY: Environmental Protection Agency.

ACTION: Notice of public comment period on Draft Integrated Science
Assessment for Sulfur Oxides Health Criteria.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) is announcing
the public comment period for the draft document titled, ``Integrated
Science Assessment for Sulfur Oxides Health Criteria; First External
Review Draft'' (EPA/600/R-07/108). The draft document was prepared by
the National Center for Environmental Assessment within EPA's Office of
Research and Development as part of the Agency's review of the air
quality criteria for sulfur oxides and the primary (health-based)
national ambient air quality standards (NAAQS) for sulfur dioxide
(SO2).
    EPA is releasing this draft document solely for the purpose of
seeking comment from the public and the Clean Air Scientific Advisory
Committee (CASAC). It does not represent and should not be construed to
represent any Agency policy, viewpoint, or determination. EPA will
consider any public comments submitted in accordance with this notice
when revising the document.

DATES: The public comment period begins on or about September 28, 2007.
Comments must be received on or before November 30, 2007.

ADDRESSES: The draft ``Integrated Science Assessment for Sulfur Oxides
Health Criteria; First External Review Draft'' is available primarily
via the Internet on the National Center for Environmental Assessment's
home page under the Recent Additions and Publications menus at http://www.epa.gov/ncea.
 A limited number of CD-ROM or paper copies will be

available. Contact Jee Young Kim by phone:<PHONE_NUMBER>, fax 919-541-
1818, or e-mail<EMAIL_ADDRESS>to request either of these, and
please provide your name, your mailing address, and the draft document
title, ``Integrated Science Assessment for Sulfur Oxides Health
Criteria; First External Review Draft'' (EPA/600/R-07/108) to
facilitate processing of your request. Comments may be submitted
electronically via http://www.regulations.gov, by mail, by facsimile,

or by hand delivery/courier. Please follow the detailed instructions
provided in the SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION section of this notice.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Jee Young Kim, NCEA; telephone: 919-
541-4157, facsimile:<PHONE_NUMBER>, or e-mail<EMAIL_ADDRESS>
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

I. Information About the Document

    Section 108(a) of the Clean Air Act directs the Administrator to
identify certain pollutants which ``may reasonably be anticipated to
endanger public health and welfare'' and to issue air quality criteria
for them. These air quality criteria are to ``accurately reflect the
latest scientific knowledge useful in indicating the kind and extent of
all identifiable effects on public health or welfare which may be
expected from the presence of [a] pollutant in the ambient air. * * *
.'' Under section 109 of the Act, EPA is then to establish national
ambient air quality standards (NAAQS) for each pollutant for which EPA
has issued criteria. Section 109(d) of the Act subsequently requires
periodic review and, if appropriate, revision of existing air quality
criteria to reflect advances in scientific knowledge on the effects of
the pollutant on public health and welfare. EPA is also to revise the
NAAQS, if appropriate, based on the revised air quality criteria.
    Sulfur oxides are one of six principal (or ``criteria'') pollutants
for which EPA has established air quality criteria and NAAQS. EPA
periodically reviews the scientific basis for these standards by
preparing an Integrated Science Assessment (ISA) (formerly called an
Air Quality Criteria Document). The ISA and supplementary annexes, in
conjunction with additional technical and policy assessments, provide
the scientific basis for EPA decisions on the adequacy of a current
NAAQS and the appropriateness of new or revised standards. The Clean
Air Scientific Advisory Committee (CASAC), an independent science
advisory committee established pursuant to section 109 of the Clean Air
Act and part of the EPA's Science Advisory Board (SAB), provides
independent scientific advice on NAAQS matters, including advice on
EPA's draft ISAs.

    On May 16, 2006 (71 FR 28023), EPA formally initiated its current
review of the criteria for Sulfur Oxides, requesting the submission of
recent scientific information on specified topics. A draft of EPA's
``Integrated Plan for Review of the Primary National Ambient Air
Quality Standard for Sulfur Dioxide'' was made available in February
2007 for public comment and was discussed by the Clean Air Science
Advisory Committee (CASAC) via a publicly accessible teleconference
consultation on May 11, 2007 (72 FR 20336). The Plan is being finalized
and will be made available on EPA's Web site (http://www.epa.gov/ttn/naaqs/standards/so2/s_so2_cr_pd.html
). In February 2007 (72 FR

6238), a workshop was held to discuss, with invited scientific experts,
initial draft materials prepared in the development of the ISA and
supplementary annexes for sulfur oxides.
    The draft ``Integrated Science Assessment for Sulfur Oxides Health
Criteria; First External Review Draft'' will be discussed by CASAC at a
future public meeting; public comments that have been received prior to
the public meeting will be provided to the CASAC review panel. A future
Federal Register notice will inform the public of the exact date and
time of that CASAC meeting.

II. How To Submit Information to the Docket

    Submit your comments, identified by Docket ID No. EPA-HQ-ORD-2006-
0260 by one of the following methods:
     http://www.regulations.gov: Follow the on-line

instructions for submitting comments.
     E-mail<EMAIL_ADDRESS>     Fax:<PHONE_NUMBER>.
     Mail: Office of Environmental Information (OEI) Docket
(Mail Code: 2822T), U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, 1200
Pennsylvania Ave., NW., Washington, DC 20460. The phone number is 202-
566-1752.
     Hand Delivery: The OEI Docket is located in the EPA
Headquarters Docket Center, EPA West Building, Room 3334, 1301
Constitution Ave., NW., Washington, DC. The EPA Docket Center Public
Reading Room is open from 8:30 a.m. to 4:30 p.m., Monday through
Friday, excluding legal holidays. The telephone number for the Public
Reading Room is<PHONE_NUMBER>. Such deliveries are only accepted during
the docket's normal hours of operation, and special arrangements should
be made for deliveries of boxed information.
    If you provide comments by mail or hand delivery, please submit one
unbound original with pages numbered consecutively, and three copies of
the comments. For attachments, provide an index, number pages
consecutively with the comments, and submit an unbound original and
three copies.
    Instructions: Direct your comments to Docket ID No. EPA-HQ-ORD-
2006-0260. Please ensure that your comments are submitted within the
specified comment period. Comments received after the closing date will
be marked ``late,'' and may only be considered if time permits. It is
EPA's policy to include all comments it receives in the public docket
without change and to make the comments available online at http://www.regulations.gov
, including any personal information provided,

unless a comment includes information claimed to be Confidential
Business Information (CBI) or other information whose disclosure is
restricted by statute. Do not submit information that you consider to
be CBI or otherwise protected through http://www.regulations.gov or e-mail. The http://www.regulations.gov Web site is an ``anonymous

access'' system, which means EPA will not know your identity or contact
information unless you provide it in the body of your comment. If you
send an e-mail comment directly to EPA without going through http://www.regulations.gov
, your e-mail address will be automatically captured

and included as part of the comment that is placed in the public docket
and made available on the Internet. If you submit an electronic
comment, EPA recommends that you include your name and other contact
information in the body of your comment and with any disk or CD-ROM you
submit. If EPA cannot read your comment due to technical difficulties
and cannot contact you for clarification, EPA may not be able to
consider your comment. Electronic files should avoid the use of special
characters, any form of encryption, and be free of any defects or
viruses. For additional information about EPA's public docket, visit
the EPA Docket Center homepage at http://www.epa.gov/epahome/dockets.htm
.

    Docket: All documents in the docket are listed in the http://www.regulations.gov
 index. Although listed in the index, some

information is not publicly available, e.g., CBI or other information
whose disclosure is restricted by statute. Certain other material, such
as copyrighted material, will be publicly available only in hard copy.
Publicly available docket materials are available either electronically
in http://www.regulations.gov or in hard copy at the OEI Docket in the

EPA Headquarters Docket Center.

    Dated: September 21, 2007.
Peter W. Preuss,
Director, National Center for Environmental Assessment.
[FR Doc. E7-19146 Filed 9-27-07; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 6560-50-P


[Federal Register Volume 81, Number 105 (Wednesday, June 1, 2016)]
[Notices]
[Pages 35006-35007]
[FR Doc No: 2016-12831]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission

[Project No. 14108-002]

Western Minnesota Municipal Power Agency; Notice of Surrender of
Preliminary Permit

    Take notice that Western Minnesota Municipal Power Agency,
permittee for the proposed Mississippi Lock and Dam, Iowa--
Hydroelectric Water Power Project, has requested that its preliminary
permit be terminated. The permit was issued on July 5, 2011, and would
have expired on June 30, 2016.\1\ The project would have been located
at

the existing U.S. Army Corps of Engineers' (Corps) Mississippi River
Lock and Dam No. 15, in Rock Island and Scott Counties near Davenport,
Iowa.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \1\ Western Minnesota Municipal Power Agency, 136 FERC ] 62,005
(2011).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    The preliminary permit for Project No. 14108 will remain in effect
until the close of business, June 24, 2016. But, if the Commission is
closed on this day, then the permit remains in effect until the close
of business on the next day in which the Commission is open.\2\ New
applications for this site may not be submitted until after the permit
surrender is effective.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \2\ 18 CFR 385.2007(a)(2) (2014).

    Dated: May 25, 2016.
Kimberly D. Bose,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2016-12831 Filed 5-31-16; 8:45 am]
 BILLING CODE 6717-01-P


[Federal Register Volume 84, Number 56 (Friday, March 22, 2019)]
[Notices]
[Pages 10845-10848]
[FR Doc No: 2019-05467]

=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

[Release No. 34-85344; File No. SR-EMERALD-2019-12]

Self-Regulatory Organizations; MIAX Emerald, LLC; Notice of
Filing and Immediate Effectiveness of a Proposed Rule Change To Amend
Exchange Rule 515A, MIAX Emerald Price Improvement Mechanism
(``PRIME'') and PRIME Solicitation Mechanism

March 18, 2019.
    Pursuant to Section 19(b)(1) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934
(``Act''),\1\ and Rule 19b-4 thereunder,\2\ notice is hereby given that
on March 6, 2019, MIAX Emerald, LLC (``MIAX Emerald'' or ``Exchange'')
filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (``Commission'') a
proposed rule change as described in Items I, II, and III below, which
Items have been prepared by the Exchange. The Commission is publishing
this notice to solicit comments on the proposed rule change from
interested persons.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \1\ 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(1).
    \2\ 17 CFR 240.19b-4.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

I. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement of the Terms of Substance
of the Proposed Rule Change

    The Exchange is filing a proposal to amend Exchange Rule 515A, MIAX
Emerald Price Improvement Mechanism (``PRIME'') and PRIME Solicitation
Mechanism.
    The text of the proposed rule change is available on the Exchange's
website at http://www.miaxoptions.com/rule-filings/emerald at MIAX
Emerald's principal office, and at the Commission's Public Reference
Room.

II. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement of the Purpose of, and
Statutory Basis for, the Proposed Rule Change

    In its filing with the Commission, the Exchange included statements
concerning the purpose of and basis for the proposed rule change and
discussed any comments it received on the proposed rule change. The
text of these statements may be examined at the places specified in
Item IV below. The Exchange has prepared summaries, set forth in
sections A, B, and C below, of the most significant aspects of such
statements.

A. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement of the Purpose of, and
Statutory Basis for, the Proposed Rule Change

1. Purpose
    The Exchange proposes to amend Exchange Rule 515A, MIAX Emerald
Price Improvement Mechanism (``PRIME'') and PRIME Solicitation
Mechanism. Specifically, the Exchange proposes to amend Rule 515A to
harmonize the rule text to Rule 515A of MIAX Options.\3\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \3\ See Securities Exchange Act Release No. 84519 (November 1,
2018), 83 FR 55776 (November 7, 2018) (SR-MIAX-2018-27).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

Background
    MIAX Emerald commenced operations as a national securities exchange
registered under Section 6 of the Act \4\ on March 1, 2019. As
described more fully in MIAX Emerald's Form 1 application,\5\ the
Exchange is an affiliate of Miami International Securities Exchange,
LLC (``MIAX Options'') and MIAX PEARL, LLC (``MIAX PEARL''). MIAX
Emerald Rules, in their current form, were filed as Exhibit B to its
Form 1 on August 16, 2018, and at that time, the MIAX Emerald Rule 515A
was substantially similar to the rule of MIAX Options Rule 515A. In the
time between when the Exchange filed its Form 1 and the time the
Exchange's application for registration as a national securities
exchange was granted,\6\ MIAX Options made changes to its rule 515A.\7\
In order to ensure consistent operation of both MIAX Emerald and MIAX
Options through having consistent rules, the Exchange proposes to amend
the MIAX Emerald Rule to adopt identical rule text from MIAX Options
Rule 515A as described below.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \4\ 15 U.S.C. 78f.
    \5\ See Securities Exchange Act Release No. 84891 (December 20,
2018), 83 FR 67421 (December 28, 2018) (File No. 10-233) (order
approving the application of MIAX Emerald for registration as a
national securities exchange.)
    \6\ See Id.
    \7\ See supra note 3.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

Proposal
    The Exchange proposes to amend Rule 515A, Interpretation and Policy
.12, PRIME for Complex Orders. The current rule provides that, ``. . .
the provisions of Rule 515A(a) . . . shall be applicable to the trading
of complex orders (as defined in Rule 518) on PRIME. The Exchange will
determine, on a class-by-class basis, the option classes in which
complex orders are available for trading on PRIME on the Exchange, and
will announce such classes to Members \8\ via Regulatory Circular.''
The Exchange now proposes to replace the word ``on'' which precedes
``PRIME'' with the phrase ``in the'' to more accurately describe
Exchange functionality and maintain consistency with how the
functionality is described in other areas of the rule.\9\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \8\ The term ``Member'' means an individual or organization
approved to exercise the trading rights associated with a Trading
Permit. Members are deemed ``members'' under the Exchange Act. See
Exchange Rule 100.
    \9\ See Exchange Rule 515A.01, 515A.03, and 515A.04, which
references usage of ``the PRIME.''
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    The Exchange also proposes to amend Rule 515A, Interpretation and
Policy .12(d), to organize the rule for clarity and ease of reference
and to codify two additional scenarios describing conditions which will
terminate a cPRIME Auction \10\ in new proposed subsections (d)(vi) and
(d)(vii).\11\ Specifically, the Exchange proposes to consolidate
current subsection (d)(v) and current subsection (d)(vi) into new
subsection (d)(v). Current subsection (d)(v) provides that a cPRIME
Auction will terminate if ``a simple order or quote in a component of
the strategy on the same side of the market as the cPRIME Agency Order
locks or crosses the NBBO for such component.'' Current subsection
(d)(vi) similarly provides that a cPRIME Auction will terminate if, ``a
simple order or quote in a component of the strategy on the opposite
side of the market as the cPRIME Agency Order: (A) locks or crosses the
NBBO for such component . . . .''
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \10\ See Exchange Rule 515A.12(a).
    \11\ The Exchange notes that the proposed changes are identical
to changes made by MIAX Options. See supra note 3.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    The Exchange now proposes to combine subsection (d)(v) and (d)(vi)
into a single rule under new subsection (d)(v) that provides that a
cPRIME Auction will terminate if, ``a simple order or quote in a
component of the strategy on either side of the market as the cPRIME
Agency Order locks or crosses the NBBO for such component;''. The
proposed change simplifies the rule text and clarifies two similar
scenarios that will terminate a cPRIME Auction when interest is
received on either side of the market as the cPRIME Agency Order. The
Exchange believes that the proposed changes promote the protection of
investors and the public interest by improving the accuracy and
precision of the Exchange's rules.
    Additionally, the Exchange proposes to adopt new subsections
(d)(vi) and (d)(vii) to include additional scenarios that will cause a
cPRIME Auction to terminate when interest is received on the same or
opposite side of the market, respectively, as the cPRIME Agency Order.
Specifically, proposed subsection (d)(vi) will provide that a cPRIME
Auction shall conclude at the earlier of the end of the RFR period,\12\
or when ``a simple order or quote in a component of the strategy,
eligible to rest on the Simple Order Book,\13\ is received on the same
side of the market as the cPRIME Agency Order and causes the icEBBO
\14\ to lock or cross the best price opposite the cPRIME Agency
Order;'' This provision ensures that a cPRIME Agency Order will always
receive the best price \15\ on the Exchange while simultaneously
preserving the integrity of the simple market by preventing orders
executed in a cPRIME Auction from possibly trading through the
Exchange's simple market.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \12\ See Exchange Rule 515A.12(d)(i).
    \13\ The term ``Simple Order Book'' is the Exchange's regular
electronic book of orders and quotes. See Exchange Rule 518(a)(15).
    \14\ The term ``icEBBO'' means the Implied Complex MIAX Emerald
Best Bid or Offer. The icEBBO is a calculation that uses the best
price from the Simple Order Book for each component of a complex
strategy including displayed and non-displayed trading interest. See
Exchange Rule 518(a)(12).
    \15\ The best price for an Agency Order to buy (sell) is the
lowest offer (highest bid) on the Exchange, comprised of all
available interest.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    An example of this scenario is illustrated below.
    Example 1--A simple order or quote on the same side as the Agency
Order causes the icEBBO to equal the best price opposite the Agency
Order

MIAX Emerald--LMM \16\ Mar 50 Call 5.80-6.30 (10x10)
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \16\ The term ``Lead Market Maker'' means a Member registered
with the Exchange for the purposes of making markets in securities
traded on the Exchange and that is vested with the rights and
responsibilities specified in Chapter VI of the Exchange's Rules
with respect to Lead Market Makers. See Exchange Rule 100.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

MIAX Emerald--LMM Mar 55 Call 2.90-3.30 (10x10)
Strategy: Buy 1 Mar 50 Call, Sell 1 Mar 55 Call
The icEBBO is 2.50 debit bid and 3.40 credit offer

    The Exchange receives a cPRIME Order with the cPRIME Agency Order
representing the purchase of the Strategy at a net debit of 3.00, 500
times. (Auto-match is not enabled and there are no orders for the
Strategy on the Strategy Book.) \17\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \17\ The term ``Strategy Book'' is the Exchange's electronic
book of complex orders and complex quotes. See Exchange Rule
518(a)(17).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    Since the order price is at least $0.01 better than (inside) the
icEBBO and the best net price of any order for the Strategy on the
Strategy Book, a cPRIME Auction can begin.

    A Request for Responses (``RFR'') is broadcast to all subscribers
and the RFR period is started.
    The following responses are received:
 @50 milliseconds BD1 response, cAOC Order \18\ @2.95 credit
sell of 100 arrives
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \18\ A Complex Auction-or-Cancel or ``cAOC'' Order is a complex
limit order used to provide liquidity during a specific Complex
Auction with a time in force that corresponds with that event. cAOC
Orders are not displayed to any market participant, and are not
eligible for trading outside of the event. See Exchange Rule
518(b)(3).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

 @70 milliseconds MM1 response, cAOC eQuote \19\ @2.98 credit
sell of 500 arrives
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \19\ A ``Complex Auction or Cancel eQuote'' or ``cAOC eQuote,''
which is an eQuote submitted by a Market Maker that is used to
provide liquidity during a specific Complex Auction with a time in
force that corresponds with the duration of a Complex Auction. See
Exchange Rule 518.02(c)(1).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    The cPRIME Auction process will continue until the Response Time
Interval \20\ ends or an event eligible to cause the cPRIME Auction to
end sooner occurs.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \20\ The ``Response Time Interval'' means the period of time
during which responses to the RFR may be entered. See Exchange Rule
518(d)(3).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

 @85 milliseconds a simple order bid to pay 6.25 for 10 MAR 50
Calls arrives
    The icEBBO is now 2.95 debit bid and 3.40 credit offer. Since the
bid side of the icEBBO is now equal to the best price opposite the
Agency Order [BD1 response, 2.95 credit sell of 100], the cPRIME
Auction is concluded prior to the end of the Response Time Interval.
    The cPRIME Auction process will trade the cPRIME Agency Order with
the best priced responses. The cPRIME Agency order will be filled as
follows: \21\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \21\ See Exchange Rule 515A(a)(2)(iii).

 The cPRIME Agency Order buys 100 from BD1 @2.95
 The cPRIME Agency Order buys 400 from MM1 @2.98

    Similarly, proposed subsection (d)(vii) will provide that a cPRIME
Auction shall conclude at the earlier of the end of the RFR period or
if, ``a simple order or quote in a component of the strategy, eligible
to rest on the Simple Order Book, is received on the opposite side of
the market from the cPRIME Agency Order and causes the icEBBO to lock
or cross the initiating price.'' This provision ensures that a cPRIME
Agency Order will always receive the best price on the Exchange while
simultaneously preserving the integrity of the simple market by
preventing orders executed in a cPRIME Auction from possibly trading
through the Exchange's simple market.
    An example of this scenario is illustrated below.
    Example 2--A simple order or quote on the opposite side from the
Agency Order causes the icEBBO to equal the initiating price

MIAX Emerald--LMM Mar 50 Call 5.80-6.30 (10x10)
MIAX Emerald--LMM Mar 55 Call 2.90-3.30 (10x10)
Strategy: Buy 1 Mar 50 Call, Sell 1 Mar 55 Call
The icEBBO is 2.50 debit bid and 3.40 credit offer

    The Exchange receives a cPRIME Order with the cPRIME Agency Order
representing the purchase of the Strategy at a net debit of 3.00, 500
times. (Auto-match is not enabled and there are no orders for the
Strategy on the Strategy Book.)
    Since the order price is at least $0.01 better than (inside) the
icEBBO and the best net price of any order for the Strategy on the
Strategy Book, a cPRIME Auction can begin.
    An RFR is broadcast to all subscribers and the RFR period is
started.
    The following responses are received:

 @40 milliseconds BD1 response, cAOC Order @2.95 credit sell of
100 arrives
 @50 milliseconds MM1 response, cAOC eQuote @2.98 credit sell
of 500 arrives

    The cPRIME Auction process will continue until the Response Time
Interval ends or an event eligible to cause the cPRIME Auction to end
sooner occurs.
 @75 milliseconds a simple order offer to sell 10 MAR 50 Calls
@5.90 arrives
    The icEBBO is now 2.50 debit bid and 3.00 credit offer. Since the
offer side of the icEBBO is now equal to the initiating price, the
cPRIME Auction is concluded prior to the end of the Response Time
Interval.
    The cPRIME Auction process will trade the cPRIME Agency Order with
the best priced responses. The cPRIME Agency order will be filled as
follows:

 The cPRIME Agency Order buys 100 from BD1 @2.95
 The cPRIME Agency Order buys 400 from MM1 @2.98

    The Exchange believes that terminating a cPRIME Auction when these
conditions are present ensures that the execution of the cPRIME Agency
Order improves the best price on the Exchange at the time of receipt,
and that there is no interference between the simple and complex
markets. (The System \22\ will reject cPRIME Agency Orders submitted
with an initiating price that is equal to or worse than (outside) the
icEBBO or any other complex orders on the Strategy Book.) \23\ This
provision ensures that a cPRIME Agency Order will always receive the
best price on the Exchange while simultaneously preserving the
integrity of the simple market by preventing orders executed in a
cPRIME Auction from possibly trading through the Exchange's simple
market. The Exchange believes that including these scenarios in the
rules will provide additional detail concerning the operation of cPRIME
Auctions and the conditions which will terminate a cPRIME Auction. The
Exchange believes that the proposed changes will provide greater
clarity to Members and the public regarding the Exchange's Rules, and
it is in the public interest for rules to be accurate and concise so as
to minimize the potential for confusion.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \22\ The term ``System'' means the automated trading system used
by the Exchange for the trading of securities. See Exchange Rule
100.
    \23\ See Exchange Rule 515A, Interpretation and Policy
.12(a)(i).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

2. Statutory Basis
    The Exchange believes that its proposed rule changes are consistent
with Section 6(b) of the Act \24\ in general, and furthers the
objectives of Section 6(b)(5) of the Act \25\ in particular, in that it
is designed to prevent fraudulent and manipulative acts and practices,
to promote just and equitable principles of trade, to foster
cooperation and coordination with persons engaged in facilitating
transactions in securities, to remove impediments to and perfect the
mechanisms of a free and open market and a national market system and,
in general, to protect investors and the public interest.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \24\ 15 U.S.C. 78f(b).
    \25\ 15 U.S.C. 78f(b)(5).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    The Exchange believes the proposed changes promote just and
equitable principles of trade and remove impediments to and perfect the
mechanism of a free and open market and a national market system
because they seek to add additional detail to, and improve the accuracy
of, the Exchange's rules. In particular, the Exchange believes that the
proposed rule changes will provide clarity and transparency to the
Exchange's rules to Members and the public, and it is in the public
interest for rules to be accurate and concise so as to minimize the
potential for confusion.
    The Exchange believes that including additional scenarios which
will terminate a cPRIME Auction promotes just and equitable principles
of trade and removes impediments to a free and open market by providing
greater

transparency concerning the operation of Exchange functionality. This
provision ensures that a cPRIME Agency Order will always receive the
best price on the Exchange while simultaneously preserving the
integrity of the simple market.
    Additionally, the Exchange believes that although MIAX Emerald
rules may, in certain instances, intentionally differ from MIAX Options
rules, the proposed changes will promote uniformity with MIAX Options
with respect to rules that are intended to be identical. MIAX Emerald
and MIAX Options may have a number of Members in common, and where
feasible the Exchange intends to implement similar behavior to provide
consistency between MIAX Options and MIAX Emerald so as to avoid
confusion among Members.

B. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement on Burden on Competition

    The Exchange does not believe that the proposed rule change will
impose any burden on competition that is not necessary or appropriate
in furtherance of the purposes of the Act. The proposed rule change is
intended to promote competition by improving the efficiency of handling
cPRIME Agency Orders on the Exchange. The Exchange believes that this
enhances intermarket competition by enabling the Exchange to compete
for this type of order flow with other exchanges that have similar
rules and functionality in place.
    The Exchange does not believe the proposal will impose any burden
on intra-market competition as the Exchange's rules apply equally to
all Members of the Exchange.

C. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement on Comments on the Proposed
Rule Change Received From Members, Participants, or Others

    Written comments were neither solicited nor received.

III. Date of Effectiveness of the Proposed Rule Change and Timing for
Commission Action

    Because the foregoing proposed rule change does not: (i)
Significantly affect the protection of investors or the public
interest; (ii) impose any significant burden on competition; and (iii)
become operative for 30 days after the date of the filing, or such
shorter time as the Commission may designate, it has become effective
pursuant to 19(b)(3)(A) of the Act \26\ and Rule 19b-4(f)(6) \27\
thereunder.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \26\ 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(3)(A).
    \27\ 17 CFR 240.19b-4(f)(6). In addition, Rule 19b-4(f)(6)
requires a self-regulatory organization to give the Commission
written notice of its intent to file the proposed rule change at
least five business days prior to the date of filing of the proposed
rule change, or such shorter time as designated by the Commission.
The Exchange has satisfied this requirement.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    At any time within 60 days of the filing of the proposed rule
change, the Commission summarily may temporarily suspend such rule
change if it appears to the Commission that such action is necessary or
appropriate in the public interest, for the protection of investors, or
otherwise in furtherance of the purposes of the Act. If the Commission
takes such action, the Commission shall institute proceedings to
determine whether the proposed rule should be approved or disapproved.

IV. Solicitation of Comments

    Interested persons are invited to submit written data, views, and
arguments concerning the foregoing, including whether the proposed rule
change is consistent with the Act. Comments may be submitted by any of
the following methods:

Electronic Comments

     Use the Commission's internet comment form (http://www.sec.gov/rules/sro.shtml); or
     Send an email to<EMAIL_ADDRESS>Please include
File Number SR-EMERALD-2019-12 on the subject line.

Paper Comments

     Send paper comments in triplicate to Secretary, Securities
and Exchange Commission, 100 F Street NE, Washington, DC 20549-1090.

All submissions should refer to File Number SR-EMERALD-2019-12. This
file number should be included on the subject line if email is used. To
help the Commission process and review your comments more efficiently,
please use only one method. The Commission will post all comments on
the Commission's internet website (http://www.sec.gov/rules/sro.shtml).
Copies of the submission, all subsequent amendments, all written
statements with respect to the proposed rule change that are filed with
the Commission, and all written communications relating to the proposed
rule change between the Commission and any person, other than those
that may be withheld from the public in accordance with the provisions
of 5 U.S.C. 552, will be available for website viewing and printing in
the Commission's Public Reference Room, 100 F Street NE, Washington, DC
20549, on official business days between the hours of 10:00 a.m. and
3:00 p.m. Copies of the filing also will be available for inspection
and copying at the principal office of the Exchange. All comments
received will be posted without change. Persons submitting comments are
cautioned that we do not redact or edit personal identifying
information from comment submissions. You should submit only
information that you wish to make available publicly. All submissions
should refer to File Number SR-EMERALD-2019-12 and should be submitted
on or before April 12, 2019.

    For the Commission, by the Division of Trading and Markets,
pursuant to delegated authority.\28\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \28\ 17 CFR 200.30-3(a)(12).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

Eduardo A. Aleman,
Deputy Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2019-05467 Filed 3-21-19; 8:45 am]
 BILLING CODE 8011-01-P


[Federal Register Volume 85, Number 180 (Wednesday, September 16, 2020)]
[Proposed Rules]
[Pages 57815-57816]
[FR Doc No: 2020-17062]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY

40 CFR Parts 60, 61, and 63

[EPA-R06-OAR-2019-0615; FRL-10013-03-Region 6]

New Source Performance Standards and National Emission Standards
for Hazardous Air Pollutants; Delegation of Authority to Albuquerque-
Bernalillo County Air Quality Control Board

AGENCY: Environmental Protection Agency (EPA).

ACTION: Proposed rule.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Albuquerque-Bernalillo County Air Quality Control Board
(ABCAQCB) has submitted updated regulations for receiving delegation
and approval of a program for the implementation and enforcement of
certain New Source Performance Standards (NSPS) and National Emission
Standards for Hazardous Air Pollutants (NESHAP) for all sources (both
Title V and non-Title V sources). These updated regulations apply to
certain NSPS promulgated by the EPA, as amended between September 14,
2013 and January 23, 2017; certain NESHAP promulgated by the EPA, as
amended between September 14, 2013 and January 23, 2017; and other
NESHAP promulgated by the EPA, as amended between September 14, 2013
and January 23, 2017, as adopted by the ABCAQCB. The EPA is providing
notice that it is updating the delegation of certain NSPS to ABCAQCB
and taking proposed action to approve the delegation of certain NESHAP
to ABCAQCB. The delegation of authority under this action does not
apply to sources located in areas defined as Indian Country.

DATES: Written comments should be received on or before October 16,
2020.

ADDRESSES: Submit your comments, identified by Docket ID No. EPA-R06-
OAR-2019-0615, at http://www.regulations.gov or via email to
<EMAIL_ADDRESS>For additional information on how to submit
comments see the detailed instructions in the ADDRESSES section of the
direct final rule located in the rules section of this issue of the
Federal Register.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Mr. Rick Barrett, EPA Region 6 Office,
6ARPE, 1201 Elm Street, Suite 500, Dallas, TX 75270,<PHONE_NUMBER>;
email<EMAIL_ADDRESS>Out of an abundance of caution for
members of the public and our staff, the EPA Region 6 office will be
closed to the public to reduce the risk of transmitting COVID-

19. We encourage the public to submit comments via https://www.regulations.gov, as there will be a delay in processing mail and no
courier or hand deliveries will be accepted. Please call or email the
contact listed above if you need alternative access to material indexed
but not provided in the docket.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: In the final rules section of this issue of
the Federal Register, the EPA is approving ABCAQCB's request for
delegation of authority to implement and enforce certain NSPS and
NESHAP for all sources (both Title V and non-Title V sources). ABCAQCB
has adopted certain NSPS and NESHAP by reference into ABCAQCB's
regulations. In addition, the EPA is waiving certain notification
requirements required by the delegated standards so that sources will
only need to notify and report to ABCAQCB, thereby avoiding duplicative
notification and reporting to the EPA. This waiver only extends to the
submission of copies of notifications and reports; EPA does not waive
the requirements in delegated standards that require notifications and
reports be submitted to an electronic database.
    The EPA is taking direct final action without prior proposal
because the EPA views this as a noncontroversial action and anticipates
no relevant adverse comments. A detailed rationale for the approval is
set forth in the direct final rule. If no relevant adverse comments are
received in response to this action, no further activity is
contemplated. If the EPA receives relevant adverse comments, the direct
final rule will be withdrawn, and all public comments received will be
addressed in a subsequent final rule based on this proposed rule. The
EPA will not institute a second comment period. Any parties interested
in commenting should do so at this time.
    For additional information, see the direct final rule which is
located in the rules section of this issue of the Federal Register.

    Dated: July 30, 2020.
David Garcia,
Director, Air & Radiation Division, Region 6.
[FR Doc. 2020-17062 Filed 9-15-20; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6560-50-P