[Federal Register Volume 83, Number 25 (Tuesday, February 6, 2018)]
[Notices]
[Page 5259]
[FR Doc No: 2018-02335]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY

[FRL-9973-53-OARM]

National Advisory Council for Environmental Policy and Technology

AGENCY: Environmental Protection Agency (EPA).

ACTION: Notice of Federal Advisory Committee Teleconference.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: Under the Federal Advisory Committee Act, EPA gives notice of
a public meeting of the National Advisory Council for Environmental
Policy and Technology (NACEPT). NACEPT provides advice to the EPA
Administrator on a broad range of environmental policy, technology, and
management issues. NACEPT members represent academia, business/
industry, non-governmental organizations, and state, local and tribal
governments. The purpose of this meeting is for NACEPT to discuss the
draft second report recommendations addressing how to best integrate
citizen science work at EPA through effective collaboration and
partnerships.
    A copy of the meeting agenda will be posted at http://www2.epa.gov/faca/nacept.

DATES: NACEPT will hold a public teleconference on February 28, 2018,
from 12 p.m. to 4 p.m. (EST).

ADDRESSES: The teleconference will be held at the EPA Headquarters,
William Jefferson Clinton Federal Building East, Room 1132, 1201
Constitution Avenue NW, Washington, DC 20004.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Eugene Green, Designated Federal
Officer, [email protected],<PHONE_NUMBER>, U.S. EPA, Office of
Resources, Operations and Management; Federal Advisory Committee
Management Division (MC1601M), 1200 Pennsylvania Avenue NW, Washington,
DC 20460.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Requests to make oral comments or to provide
written comments to NACEPT should be sent to Eugene Green at
[email protected] by February 21st. The teleconference is open to
the public, with limited lines available on a first-come, first-served
basis. Members of the public wishing to participate in the
teleconference should contact Eugene Green via email or by calling
(202) 564-2432 no later than February 21st.
    Meeting Access: Information regarding accessibility and/or
accommodations for individuals with disabilities should be directed to
Eugene Green at the email address or phone number listed above. To
ensure adequate time for processing, please make requests for
accommodations at least 10 days prior to the teleconference meeting.

    Dated: January 23, 2018.
Eugene Green,
Designated Federal Officer.
[FR Doc. 2018-02335 Filed 2-5-18; 8:45 am]
 BILLING CODE 6560-50-P


[Federal Register Volume 85, Number 114 (Friday, June 12, 2020)]
[Notices]
[Pages 35929-35930]
[FR Doc No: 2020-12719]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission

[Project No. 4428-011]

Walden Hydro, LLC; Notice of Application Tendered for Filing With
the Commission and Soliciting Additional Study Requests and
Establishing Procedural Schedule for Relicensing and a Deadline for
Submission of Final Amendments

    Take notice that the following hydroelectric application has been
filed with the Commission and is available for public inspection.
    a. Type of Application: New Major License.
    b. Project No.: 4428-011.
    c. Date filed: May 29, 2020.
    d. Applicant: Walden Hydro, LLC.
    e. Name of Project: Walden Hydroelectric Project.
    f. Location: On the Wallkill River, in the Village of Walden,
Orange County, New York. The project does not occupy any federal land.
    g. Filed Pursuant to: Federal Power Act 16 U.S.C. 791(a)-825(r).
    h. Applicant Contact: Ms. Elise Anderson, Senior Environmental
Permitting Specialist, Walden Hydro, LLC, Enel Green Power North
America, Inc., 100 Brickstone Square, Suite 300, Andover, MA 01810;
Phone at<PHONE_NUMBER> or email at<EMAIL_ADDRESS>    i. FERC Contact: Samantha Pollak at<PHONE_NUMBER>, or
<EMAIL_ADDRESS>    j. Cooperating agencies: Federal, state, local, and tribal agencies
with jurisdiction and/or special expertise with respect to
environmental issues that wish to cooperate in the preparation of the
environmental document should follow the instructions for filing such
requests described in item l below. Cooperating agencies should note
the Commission's policy that agencies that cooperate in the preparation
of the environmental document cannot also intervene. See, 94 FERC ]
61,076 (2001).
    k. Pursuant to section 4.32(b)(7) of 18 CFR of the Commission's
regulations, if any resource agency, Indian Tribe, or person believes
that an additional scientific study should be conducted in order to
form an adequate factual basis for a complete analysis of the
application on its merit, the resource agency, Indian Tribe, or person
must file a request for a study with the Commission not later than 60
days from the date of filing of the application, and serve a copy of
the request on the applicant.
    l. Deadline for filing additional study requests and requests for
cooperating agency status: July 28, 2020.
    The Commission strongly encourages electronic filing. Please file
additional study requests and requests for cooperating agency status
using the Commission's eFiling system at http://www.ferc.gov/docs-filing/efiling.asp. For assistance, please contact FERC Online Support
at<EMAIL_ADDRESS>(866) 208-3676 (toll free), or (202)
502-8659 (TTY).
    m. The application is not ready for environmental analysis at this
time.
    n. The Walden Project consists of the following existing
facilities: (1) A 417-foot-long, V-shaped concrete dam topped with 2-
foot-high flashboards; (2) an impoundment with a surface area of 69
acres at the normal pool elevation of 321.3 feet National Geodetic
Vertical Datum of 1929 (NGVD29); (3) an intake structure consisting of
a 252-foot-long, 56-foot-wide, 18-foot-deep canal forebay; (4) four 40-
foot-long steel penstocks; (5) a 60-foot-long, 45-foot-wide, 29-foot-
high powerhouse containing three horizontal double-runner Francis
turbine units with ratings of 980 kilowatts (kW), 630 kW, and 500 kW,
respectively for a total rated capacity of 2,110 kW; (6) a 30-foot-
long, 37-foot-wide tailrace; (7) a 230-foot-long bypass reach
consisting primarily of bedrock; (8) a transmission line; (9) a
substation with a single-phase 12.5-kilovolt transformer; and (10)
appurtenant facilities.
    The project operates in a run-of-river mode with a minimum flow of
31 cubic feet per second. The project has an average annual generation
of 3,333 megawatt-hours between 2012 and 2019.
    o. A copy of the application may be viewed on the Commission's
website at http://www.ferc.gov using the ``eLibrary'' link. Enter the
docket number excluding the last three digits in the docket number
field to access the document (P-4428). For assistance, contact FERC
Online Support. At this time, the Commission has suspended access to
the Commission's Public Reference Room due to the proclamation
declaring a National Emergency concerning the Novel Coronavirus Disease
(COVID-19) issued by the President on March 13, 2020. For assistance,
contact FERC at<EMAIL_ADDRESS>or call toll-free, (866)
208-3676 or<PHONE_NUMBER> (TTY).
    You may also register online at http://www.ferc.gov/docs-filing/esubscription.asp to be notified via

email of new filings and issuances related to this or other pending
projects. For assistance, contact FERC Online Support.
    p. Procedural schedule and final amendments: The application will
be processed according to the following preliminary schedule. Revisions
to the schedule will be made as appropriate.

Issue Deficiency Letter (if necessary)--July 2020
Request Additional Information--July 2020
Issue Acceptance Letter--October 2020
Issue Scoping Document 1 for comments--November 2020
Request Additional Information (if necessary)--January 2021
Issue Scoping Document 2 (if necessary)--February 2021
Issue Notice of Ready for Environmental Analysis--February 2021
Commission issues EA--September 2021
Comments on EA--October 2021

    Final amendments to the application must be filed with the
Commission no later than 30 days from the issuance date of the notice
of ready for environmental analysis.

    Dated: June 8, 2020.
Kimberly D. Bose,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2020-12719 Filed 6-11-20; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6717-01-P


[Federal Register Volume 79, Number 60 (Friday, March 28, 2014)]
[Notices]
[Pages 17549-17551]
[FR Doc No: 2014-06917]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES

Food and Drug Administration

[Docket No. FDA-2013-N-0723]

Agency Information Collection Activities; Submission for Office
of Management and Budget Review; Comment Request; Reports of
Corrections and Removals of Medical Devices and Radiation Emitting
Products

AGENCY: Food and Drug Administration, HHS.

ACTION: Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Food and Drug Administration (FDA) is announcing that a
proposed collection of information has been submitted to the Office of
Management and Budget (OMB) for review and clearance under the
Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995.

DATES: Fax written comments on the collection of information by April
28, 2014.

ADDRESSES: To ensure that comments on the information collection are
received, OMB recommends that written comments be faxed to the Office
of Information and Regulatory Affairs, OMB, Attn: FDA Desk Officer,
FAX:<PHONE_NUMBER>, or emailed to<EMAIL_ADDRESS>All
comments should be identified with the OMB control number 0910-0359.
Also include the FDA docket number found in brackets in the heading of
this document.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: FDA PRA Staff, Office of Operations,
Food and Drug Administration, 1350 Piccard Dr., PI50-400B, Rockville,
MD 20850<EMAIL_ADDRESS>
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: In compliance with 44 U.S.C. 3507, FDA has
submitted the following proposed collection of information to OMB for
review and clearance.

Reports of Corrections and Removals of Medical Devices and Radiation
Emitting Products--(OMB Control Number 0910-0359)--Extension

I. Reports of Corrections and Removals

    Under Sec.  806.10 (21 CFR 806.10), each device manufacturer or
importer shall submit a written report to FDA of any action initiated
to correct or remove a device to reduce a risk to health posed by the
device or to remedy a violation of the Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic
Act caused by the device, which may present a risk to health within 10
working days of initiating the correction or removal.
    Under Sec.  806.20(a) (21 CFR 806.20(a)), each device manufacturer
or importer of a device who initiates a correction or removal of a
device that is not required to be reported to FDA shall keep a record
of the correction or removal.
    FDA currently accepts by mail reports of corrections and removals
(806 reports) associated with medical and radiation emitting products
regulated by the Center for Devices and Radiological Health (CDRH)
under part 806.
    For general information and assistance with 806 reports, contact
the CDRH Division of Small Manufacturers, International and Consumer
Assistance (DSMICA) by telephone: 1-800-638-2041 or<PHONE_NUMBER>, or by
email<EMAIL_ADDRESS>
II. Proposed Electronic Submission Process

    FDA is now proposing to make available, as a voluntary alternative
to paper submissions, an electronic process for submitting 806 reports.
The electronic process is expected to enhance consistency of submission
data and to speed submission processing. Submission by mail will remain
available and will be augmented by the new electronic submission
process.
    Establishing a process for using electronic submissions does
necessitate some preparation by reporters, which includes obtaining
both: (1) A WebTrader account and (2) a digital verification
certificate. Many other FDA applications also utilize WebTrader. If an
applicant already has an account with the WebTrader Electronic
Submission Gateway (ESG) and a digital verification certificate
(certificate must be valid for 1 to 3 years), no additional burden or
cost will be incurred outside of the time it takes to make the
submission of corrections and removals. However, for calculating the
burden for this collection, FDA is assuming that all respondents will
be establishing a new WebTrader account and purchasing a digital
verification certificate.
    Establishing a new account for sending electronic submissions may
take up to 2 weeks. During that time, new reporters are advised to
submit paper reports to avoid inadvertently missing the 10-day
timeframes associated with submission of reports under part 806.
    Upon approval of the information collection, a submitter would go
to http://www.fda.gov/ForIndustry/FDAeSubmitter/default.htm to submit
an 806 report via the electronic portal. Additional information about
FDA's ESG is posted online at http://www.fda.gov/ForIndustry/ElectronicSubmissionsGateway/default.htm. You can also email

questions about the system to FDA's ESG Help Desk<EMAIL_ADDRESS>
III. Online Support and Information

    CDRH intends to establish a Web site for online support and
information about electronic submissions of 806 reports. The Web site
will provide the following information:
 Introduction
 Tracking information
 Contact information
    [cir] Submitter identification
    [cir] Manufacturer information
    [cir] Recalling firm information
    [cir] Importer information
 Correction and removal report information
    [cir] Event
    [cir] Correction and removal product data
    [cir] Domestic consignee information
    [cir] Foreign consignee information
    [cir] Communication documentation
    [cir] Additional documentation (which allows for attaching
WordTM, ExcelTM, and PDFTM documents)

    Within the online help provided by FDA, users will find yellow
light bulb icons. These icons indicate supplemental tips and
information.
    In the Federal Register of June 28, 2013 (78 FR 38992), FDA
published a 60-day notice requesting public comment on the proposed
collection of information. FDA received two sets of comments, which
were fundamentally the same. Comments relevant to the information
request are addressed in this document.
    (Comment 1) The comments state that the proposed collection of
information and the electronic process of collecting reports of
corrections and removals do not appear to be necessary for the proper
performance of FDA's functions. However, they do not provide supporting
details for this assertion. The comments also state that the proposal
to allow information to be reported via an electronic process promises
to deliver efficiency advantages to the Agency. The comments request
that FDA identify improvements in resources or processing time as a
result of the electronic collection methods.
    (Response) We believe that the information collection is necessary
for the proper performance of FDA's functions. The information
collected in the reports of corrections and removals is used by FDA to
identify marketed devices that have serious problems and to ensure that
FDA has current and complete information regarding these corrections
and removals to help determine whether recall action is appropriate and
adequate. Failure to collect this information would prevent FDA from
receiving timely information about devices that may have a serious
effect on the health of users of the devices.
    While we expect the electronic submission of corrections and
removals to improve the efficiency with which FDA processes the
reports, we have not quantified data specific to time savings for FDA
and we note that such quantification is beyond the scope of the
information collection request. We believe that submitters will find
the electronic submission process to be user friendly and that it will
enhance the consistency of submission data. We estimate that an
electronic report will take the same amount of time for the submitter
as a paper report takes. We also note that electronic submission is
voluntary and a submitter may still send a paper report.
    (Comment 2) The comments state that it is unclear how the collected
information will be used and made available to the public. They ask
whether all information that is collected via electronic means will be
made available to the public and whether there is a process that can be
used by reporters to identify certain information as confidential. One
commenter expressed concerns regarding whether information such as
phone and email conversations, agreements on dispositions, etc., would
be made available on the public Web site.
    (Response) The addition of the electronic submission process does
not change how the data will be used or disclosed to the public as
compared to a paper submission; it simply provides a different means to
submit the same information collected previously via paper submission.
The data elements that are displayed publicly can be viewed at http://www.accessdata.fda.gov/scripts/cdrh/cfdocs/cfRES/res.cfm. Followup
phone and email conversations, etc., are not part of the electronic
submission system. Under the Freedom of Information Act (FOIA) (5
U.S.C. 552), the public has broad access to government documents.
Reports and other information submitted to FDA under part 806 are
releasable if they fall within the scope of the Agency's regulation
concerning ``Public Information'' (21 CFR part 20). However, FOIA
exempts disclosures of certain government records from mandatory public
disclosures (5 U.S.C. 552(b)(1)-(b)(9)). One such provision exempts
from public disclosure ``trade secrets'' and ``confidential commercial
or financial information'' that is privileged (5 U.S.C. 552(b)(4)).
    (Comment 3) The commenters feel that the burden is underestimated
because the burden estimate assumes that reporters have compatible
systems to transfer and upload information and that reporters are
already familiar with FDA's electronic submission system. The comments
state that the electronic submission process shifts the data entry
burden from FDA to the reporter.
    (Response) We disagree. Most firms that report under part 806 have
already used eSubmitter for other types of submissions, such as
electronic medical device reporting, eCopy, and ISO submissions, and,
therefore, would already have compatible systems and would be familiar
with FDA's ESG.
    The addition of electronic submission does not shift burden from
FDA to respondents because respondents already enter the data manually
for submission in paper or email format. An electronic submission
includes the same data elements, required by part 806, that are
included in a paper submission.
    (Comment 4) The comments state that the collection does not
consider the internal systems that a reporter may have to establish to
meet the electronic reporting requirements (validating computer
systems, developing new procedures, training staff, etc.). The
commenters feel that these issues will add an incremental burden for
users to implement and, possibly, maintain the electronic reporting
process.
    (Response) Validation testing and basic training on the system are
included in the estimated hourly burden for set up of the electronic
process. Reporting does not require additional training or new
procedures; the system prompts users for the required information. The
comment does not provide suggestions for specific changes to the
estimated burden or any data to support an increase of burden hours.
    (Comment 5) The comments express concerns about communication
between FDA and the reporter regarding electronic submissions of
corrections and removals. The comments question whether the Agency will
provide feedback to manufacturers, followup requests, monthly
reporting, or termination requests in the ``electronic record.'' The
comments request clarification regarding how electronic submission will
enhance the consistency of submission data.
    (Response) The electronic submission option does not change how FDA
will communicate with firms that submit reports of corrections and
removals. The electronic submission system is only for reports of
corrections and removals under part 806. It does not include feedback,
followup, monthly reporting, or terminations requests. The comments
seem to assume that the ``electronic

record'' will now be kept by FDA. However, the recordkeeping
requirements have not changed for firms that submit reports of
corrections and removals under part 806. The predefined data elements
of the electronic 806 report will inherently enhance the consistency of
submission data by ensuring complete reporting, thus minimizing the
need to solicit missing data.
    (Comment 6) The comments request the release of the data fields and
proposed online support information for reporters to review and provide
comments.
    (Response) Screen captures of the data fields are available in the
public docket (http://www.regulations.gov, in Docket No. FDA-2013-N-
0723). The online support information is available as follows:
     http://www.fda.gov/forindustry/electronicsubmissionsgateway/ for information and support for the ESG,
including information about setting up a WebTrader account;
<EMAIL_ADDRESS>is the email address for getting
technical help with submissions;
     http://www.fda.gov/ForIndustry/FDAeSubmitter/ucm193862.htm
provides tutorials for navigation and use of the eSubmitter
application; and
     http://www.fda.gov/Safety/Recalls/IndustryGuidance/ucm129334.htm provides a list of ORA District and Headquarters Recall
Coordinators.
    FDA estimates the burden of this collection of information as
follows:

                                                     Table 1--Estimated Annual Reporting Burden \1\
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
                                                                                Total
                                                                    Number of       Number of     Total annual   Average burden   Total    operating and
                     Activity (21 CFR part)                        respondents    responses per     responses     per response    hours     maintenance
                                                                                respondent                                      \2\         costs
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Electronic process setup (one time)............................           1,022               1           1,022            9.25    9,454         $30,660
Submission of corrections and removals (part 806)..............           1,033               1           1,033              10   10,330  ..............
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
\1\ There are no capital costs associated with this collection of information.
\2\ Totals may not sum due to rounding.

                                                   Table 2--Estimated Annual Recordkeeping Burden \1\
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
                                                                                Number of                       Average burden
                       Activity (21 CFR part)                           Number of       records per      Total annual         per          Total hours
                                                                      recordkeepers     recordkeeper       records       recordkeeping
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Records of corrections and removals (part 806).....................              93                1               93               10              930
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
\1\ There are no capital costs or operating and maintenance costs associated with this collection of information.

    FDA's estimate of the reporting and recordkeeping burden is based
on our experience with this program and similar programs that utilize
the ESG. For respondents who use the electronic process, the operating
and maintenance costs associated with this information collection are
approximately $30 per year to purchase a digital verification
certificate (certificate must be valid for 1 to 3 years). This burden
may be minimized if the respondent has already purchased a verification
certificate for other electronic submissions to FDA. However, FDA is
assuming that all respondents who submit corrections and removals using
the electronic process will be establishing a new WebTrader account and
purchasing a digital verification certificate.

    Dated: March 24, 2014.
Leslie Kux,
Assistant Commissioner for Policy.
[FR Doc. 2014-06917 Filed 3-27-14; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4160-01-P


[Federal Register Volume 88, Number 181 (Wednesday, September 20, 2023)]
[Notices]
[Page 64907]
[FR Doc No: 2023-20371]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission

[Docket No. ER23-2813-000]

Castle Solar, LLC; Supplemental Notice That Initial Market-Based
Rate Filing Includes Request for Blanket Section 204 Authorization

    This is a supplemental notice in the above-referenced proceeding of
Castle Solar, LLC's application for market-based rate authority, with
an accompanying rate tariff, noting that such application includes a
request for blanket authorization, under 18 CFR part 34, of future
issuances of securities and assumptions of liability.
    Any person desiring to intervene or to protest should file with the
Federal Energy Regulatory Commission, 888 First Street NE, Washington,
DC 20426, in accordance with Rules 211 and 214 of the Commission's
Rules of Practice and Procedure (18 CFR 385.211 and 385.214). Anyone
filing a motion to intervene or protest must serve a copy of that
document on the Applicant.
    Notice is hereby given that the deadline for filing protests with
regard to the applicant's request for blanket authorization, under 18
CFR part 34, of future issuances of securities and assumptions of
liability, is October 4, 2023.
    The Commission encourages electronic submission of protests and
interventions in lieu of paper, using the FERC Online links at http://www.ferc.gov. To facilitate electronic service, persons with internet
access who will eFile a document and/or be listed as a contact for an
intervenor must create and validate an eRegistration account using the
eRegistration link. Select the eFiling link to log on and submit the
intervention or protests.
    Persons unable to file electronically may mail similar pleadings to
the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission, 888 First Street NE,
Washington, DC 20426. Hand delivered submissions in docketed
proceedings should be delivered to Health and Human Services, 12225
Wilkins Avenue, Rockville, Maryland 20852.
    In addition to publishing the full text of this document in the
Federal Register, the Commission provides all interested persons an
opportunity to view and/or print the contents of this document via the
internet through the Commission's Home Page (http://www.ferc.gov) using
the ``eLibrary'' link. Enter the docket number excluding the last three
digits in the docket number field to access the document. At this time,
the Commission has suspended access to the Commission's Public
Reference Room, due to the proclamation declaring a National Emergency
concerning the Novel Coronavirus Disease (COVID-19), issued by the
President on March 13, 2020. For assistance, contact the Federal Energy
Regulatory Commission at [email protected] or call toll-free,
(886) 208-3676 or TYY,<PHONE_NUMBER>.
    The Commission's Office of Public Participation (OPP) supports
meaningful public engagement and participation in Commission
proceedings. OPP can help members of the public, including landowners,
environmental justice communities, Tribal members and others, access
publicly available information and navigate Commission processes. For
public inquiries and assistance with making filings such as
interventions, comments, or requests for rehearing, the public is
encouraged to contact OPP at<PHONE_NUMBER> or [email protected].

    Dated: September 14, 2023.
Debbie-Anne A. Reese,
Deputy Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2023-20371 Filed 9-19-23; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6717-01-P


[Federal Register Volume 84, Number 127 (Tuesday, July 2, 2019)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Pages 31481-31483]
[FR Doc No: 2019-14085]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY

Coast Guard

33 CFR Part 165

[Docket Number USCG-2019-0540]
RIN 1625-AA00

Safety Zone; Lake Michigan, Manitowoc River, Manitowoc, WI

AGENCY: Coast Guard, DHS.

ACTION: Temporary final rule.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Coast Guard is establishing a temporary safety zone for
all navigable waters of the Manitowoc River, in the vicinity of the
10th St. Bridge and the northern point of the

Manitowoc Dock. This action is needed to protect personnel and vessels
from potential hazards created by the introduction of kayaks and paddle
board in the channel. Entry of vessels or persons into this zone is
prohibited unless specifically authorized by the Captain of the Port
Lake Michigan.

DATES: This rule is effective from 10:45 a.m. through noon on July 13,
2019.

ADDRESSES: To view documents mentioned in this preamble as being
available in the docket, go to https://www.regulations.gov, type USCG-
2019-0540 in the ``SEARCH'' box and click ``SEARCH.'' Click on Open
Docket Folder on the line associated with this rule.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: If you have questions on this rule,
call or email the marine event coordinator, MSTC Kaleena Carpino,
Prevention Department, Coast Guard Sector Lake Michigan, Milwaukee, WI;
telephone<PHONE_NUMBER>, email<EMAIL_ADDRESS>
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

I. Table of Abbreviations

CFR Code of Federal Regulations
DHS Department of Homeland Security
FR Federal Register
NPRM Notice of proposed rulemaking
Sec.  Section
U.S.C. United States Code

II. Background Information and Regulatory History

    The Coast Guard is issuing this temporary rule without prior notice
and opportunity to comment pursuant to authority under section 4(a) of
the Administrative Procedure Act (APA) (5 U.S.C. 553(b)). This
provision authorizes an agency to issue a rule without prior notice and
opportunity to comment when the agency for good cause finds that those
procedures are ``impracticable, unnecessary, or contrary to the public
interest.'' Under 5 U.S.C. 553(b)(B), the Coast Guard finds that good
cause exists for not publishing a notice of proposed rulemaking (NPRM)
with respect to this rule because doing so would be impracticable and
contrary to the public interest. The final details for this event were
not known to the Coast Guard until there was insufficient time
remaining before the event to publish an NPRM. Thus, delaying the
effective date of this rule to wait for a comment period to run would
be both impracticable and contrary to the public interest because it
would inhibit the Coast Guard's ability to protect the public, vessels,
mariners, and property from the hazards associated with a kayak and
paddle board race on July 13, 2019.
    Under 5 U.S.C. 553(d)(3), the Coast Guard finds that good cause
exists for making this rule effective less than 30 days after
publication in the Federal Register. For the same reasons discussed in
the preceding paragraph, waiting for a 30 day notice period to run
would be impracticable and contrary to the public interest.

III. Legal Authority and Need for Rule

    The Coast Guard is issuing this rule under authority in 46 U.S.C.
70034 (previously 33 U.S.C. 1231); The Captain of the Port Lake
Michigan will enforce a safety zone from 10:45 a.m. through noon on
July 13, 2019, for a kayak and paddle board race to occur on the
Manitowoc River in Manitowoc, WI. The Captain of the Port Lake Michigan
has determined that this race will pose a significant risk to public
safety and property. Such hazards include collisions, capsized kayaks,
and contenders in the water.

IV. Discussion of the Rule

    With the aforementioned hazards in mind, the Captain of the Port
Lake Michigan has determined that this temporary safety zone is
necessary to protect persons and vessels during the kayak and
paddleboard race in the waters of the Manitowoc River, in Manitowoc,
WI. This zone is effective and will be enforced from 10:45 a.m. through
noon on July 13, 2019. The safety zone will be enforced for all
navigable waters of the Manitowoc River, in the vicinity of the 10th
St. Bridge and the Northern point of the Manitowoc Dock within an area
bounded by the following coordinates; at 44[deg]05'29.5'' N
87[deg]39'37.5'' W (NAD 83) continuing North across the Manitowoc River
to 44[deg]05'32.9'' N 87[deg]39'37.7'' W (NAD 83) then East along the
riverbank to 44[deg]05'32.6'' N 87[deg]39'02.2'' W (NAD 83) then South
across the Manitowoc River to 44[deg]05'29.1'' N 87[deg]39'03.5'' W
(NAD 83) then West returning to the point of origin.
    Entry into, transiting, or anchoring within the safety zone is
prohibited unless authorized by the Captain of the Port Lake Michigan
or his or her designated on-scene representative. The Captain of the
Port or his or her designated on-scene representative may be contacted
via VHF Channel 16.

V. Regulatory Analyses

    We developed this rule after considering numerous statutes and
Executive orders related to rulemaking. Below we summarize our analyses
based on a number of these statutes and Executive orders, and we
discuss First Amendment rights of protestors.

A. Regulatory Planning and Review

    Executive Orders 12866 and 13563 direct agencies to assess the
costs and benefits of available regulatory alternatives and, if
regulation is necessary, to select regulatory approaches that maximize
net benefits. Executive order 13563 emphasizes the importance of
quantifying both costs and benefits, of reducing costs, of harmonizing
rules, and of promoting flexibility. Executive Order 13771 directs
agencies to control regulatory costs through a budgeting process. This
rule has not been designated a ``significant regulatory action,'' under
Executive Order 12866. Accordingly, this rule has not been reviewed by
the Office of Management and Budget (OMB), and pursuant to OMB guidance
it is exempt from the requirements of Executive Order 13771.
    We conclude that this rule is not a significant regulatory action
because we anticipate that it will have minimal impact on the economy,
will not interfere with other agencies, will not adversely alter the
budget of any grant or loan recipients, and will not raise any novel
legal or policy issues. This regulatory action determination is based
on the size, location, duration, and time-of-year of the safety zone.
The safety zone created by this rule will be relatively small and
enforced for only one and a quarter hours. Under certain conditions,
vessels may still transit through the safety zone when permitted by the
Captain of the Port. Moreover, the Coast Guard will issue Broadcast
Notice to Mariners via VHF-FM marine channel 16 about the zone.

B. Impact on Small Entities

    The Regulatory Flexibility Act of 1980, 5 U.S.C. 601-612, as
amended, requires Federal agencies to consider the potential impact of
regulations on small entities during rulemaking. The term ``small
entities'' comprises small businesses, not-for-profit organizations
that are independently owned and operated and are not dominant in their
fields, and governmental jurisdictions with populations of less than
50,000. The Coast Guard certifies under 5 U.S.C. 605(b) that this rule
will not have a significant economic impact on a substantial number of
small entities.
    While some owners or operators of vessels intending to transit the
safety zone may be small entities, for the reasons stated in section
V.A, this rule will not have a significant economic impact on any
vessel owner or operator.

    Under section 213(a) of the Small Business Regulatory Enforcement
Fairness Act of 1996 (Pub. L. 104-121), we want to assist small
entities in understanding this rule. If the rule would affect your
small business, organization, or governmental jurisdiction and you have
questions concerning its provisions or options for compliance, please
contact the person listed in the FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT
section.
    Small businesses may send comments on the actions of Federal
employees who enforce, or otherwise determine compliance with, Federal
regulations to the Small Business and Agriculture Regulatory
Enforcement Ombudsman and the Regional Small Business Regulatory
Fairness Boards. The Ombudsman evaluates these actions annually and
rates each agency's responsiveness to small business. If you wish to
comment on actions by employees of the Coast Guard, call 1-888-REG-FAIR
(1-888-734-3247). The Coast Guard will not retaliate against small
entities that question or complain about this rule or any policy or
action of the Coast Guard.

C. Collection of Information

    This rule will not call for a new collection of information under
the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 (44 U.S.C. 3501-3520).

D. Federalism and Indian Tribal Governments

    A rule has implications for federalism under Executive Order 13132,
Federalism, if it has a substantial direct effect on the States, on the
relationship between the national government and the States, or on the
distribution of power and responsibilities among the various levels of
government. We have analyzed this rule under that Order and have
determined that it is consistent with the fundamental federalism
principles and preemption requirements described in Executive Order
13132.
    Also, this rule does not have tribal implications under Executive
Order 13175, Consultation and Coordination with Indian Tribal
Governments, because it does not have a substantial direct effect on
one or more Indian tribes, on the relationship between the Federal
Government and Indian tribes, or on the distribution of power and
responsibilities between the Federal Government and Indian tribes. If
you believe this rule has implications for federalism or Indian tribes,
please contact the person listed in the FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT
section above.

E. Unfunded Mandates Reform Act

    The Unfunded Mandates Reform Act of 1995 (2 U.S.C. 1531-1538)
requires Federal agencies to assess the effects of their discretionary
regulatory actions. In particular, the Act addresses actions that may
result in the expenditure by a State, local, or tribal government, in
the aggregate, or by the private sector of $100,000,000 (adjusted for
inflation) or more in any one year. Though this rule will not result in
such an expenditure, we do discuss the effects of this rule elsewhere
in this preamble.

F. Environment

    We have analyzed this rule under Department of Homeland Security
Directive 023-01 and Environmental Planning COMDTINST 5090.1 (series),
which guide the Coast Guard in complying with the National
Environmental Policy Act of 1969 (42 U.S.C. 4321-4370f), and have
determined that this action is one of a category of actions that do not
individually or cumulatively have a significant effect on the human
environment. This rule involves a safety zone lasting only one and a
quarter hours that will prohibit entry within the established safety
zone for the race. It is categorically excluded from further review
under paragraph L[60](a) in Table 3-1 of U.S. Coast Guard Environmental
Planning Implementing Procedures 5090.1. A Record of Environmental
Consideration supporting this determination is available in the docket
where indicated under ADDRESSES.

G. Protest Activities

    The Coast Guard respects the First Amendment rights of protesters.
Protesters are asked to contact the person listed in the FOR FURTHER
INFORMATION CONTACT section to coordinate protest activities so that
your message can be received without jeopardizing the safety or
security of people, places or vessels.

List of Subjects in 33 CFR Part 165

    Harbors, Marine safety, Navigation (water), Reporting and
recordkeeping requirements, Security measures, Waterways.

    For the reasons discussed in the preamble, the Coast Guard amends
33 CFR part 165 as follows:

PART 165--REGULATED NAVIGATION AREAS AND LIMITED ACCESS AREAS

0
1. The authority citation for part 165 continues to read as follows:

    Authority:  46 U.S.C. 70034, 70051; 33 CFR 1.05-1, 6.04-1, 6.04-
6, and 160.5; Department of Homeland Security Delegation No. 0170.1.

0
2. Add Sec.  165.T09-0540 to read as follows:

Sec.  165.T09-0540  Safety Zone; Lake Michigan, Manitowoc River,
Manitowoc, WI.

    (a) Location. All navigable waters of the Manitowoc River, in the
vicinity of the 10th St. Bridge and the Northern point of the Manitowoc
Dock within an area bounded by the following coordinates; at
44[deg]05'29.5'' N 87[deg]39'37.5'' W (NAD 83) continuing North across
the Manitowoc River to 44[deg]05'32.9'' N 87[deg]39'37.7'' W (NAD 83)
then East along the riverbank to 44[deg]05'32.6'' N 87[deg]39'02.2'' W
(NAD 83) then South across the Manitowoc River to 44[deg]05'29.1'' N
87[deg]39'03.5'' W (NAD 83) then West returning to the point of origin.
    (b) Effective and enforcement period. This section is effective and
will be enforced from 10:45 a.m. through noon on July 13, 2019.
    (c) Regulations. (1) In accordance with the general regulations in
Sec.  165.23, entry into, transiting, or anchoring within this safety
zone is prohibited unless authorized by the Captain of the Port Lake
Michigan or a designated on-scene representative.
    (2) This safety zone is closed to all vessel traffic, except as may
be permitted by the Captain of the Port Lake Michigan or a designated
on-scene representative.
    (3) The ``on-scene representative'' of the Captain of the Port Lake
Michigan is any Coast Guard commissioned, warrant or petty officer who
has been designated by the Captain of the Port Lake Michigan to act on
his or her behalf.
    (4) Vessel operators desiring to enter or operate within the safety
zone must contact the Captain of the Port Lake Michigan or an on-scene
representative to obtain permission to do so. The Captain of the Port
Lake Michigan or an on-scene representative may be contacted via VHF
Channel 16. Vessel operators given permission to enter or operate in
the safety zone must comply with all directions given to them by the
Captain of the Port Lake Michigan or an on-scene representative.

    Dated: June 26, 2019.
Thomas J. Stuhlreyer,
Captain, U.S. Coast Guard, Captain of the Port, Lake Michigan.
[FR Doc. 2019-14085 Filed 7-1-19; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 9110-04-P


[Federal Register Volume 86, Number 152 (Wednesday, August 11, 2021)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Pages 43913-43914]
[FR Doc No: 2021-16999]

=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY

Coast Guard

33 CFR Part 100

[Docket Number USCG-2021-0550]
RIN 1625-AA08

Special Local Regulation; Ohio River, Owensboro, KY

AGENCY: Coast Guard, DHS.

ACTION: Temporary final rule.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Coast Guard is establishing a temporary special local
regulation on the Ohio River mile 754.0-760.0 in Owensboro, KY on
August 12-15, 2021. This special local regulation is needed to protect
personnel, vessels, and the marine environment from potential hazards
created during the Owensboro Air Show. Entry into this zone is
prohibited unless specifically authorized by the Captain of the Port
Sector Ohio Valley (COTP).

DATES: This rule is effective from 10:30 a.m. 6:30 p.m. on August 12,
2021 through August 15, 2021.

ADDRESSES: To view documents mentioned in this preamble as being
available in the docket, go to https://www.regulations.gov, type USCG-
2021-0550 in the search box and click ``Search.'' Next, in the Document
Type column, select ``Supporting & Related Material.''

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: If you have questions on this rule,
call or email MST3 Christopher Matthews, U.S. Coast Guard; telephone
502-779-5334, email<EMAIL_ADDRESS>
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

I. Table of Abbreviations

CFR Code of Federal Regulations
DHS Department of Homeland Security
FR Federal Register
NPRM Notice of proposed rulemaking
Sec.  Section
U.S.C. United States Code

II. Background Information and Regulatory History

    The Coast Guard is issuing this temporary rule without prior notice
and opportunity to comment pursuant to authority under section 4(a) of
the Administrative Procedure Act (APA) (5 U.S.C. 553(b)). This
provision authorizes an agency to issue a rule without prior notice and
opportunity to comment when the agency for good cause finds that those
procedures are ``impracticable, unnecessary, or contrary to the public
interest.'' Under 5 U.S.C. 553(b)(B), the Coast Guard finds that good
cause exists for not publishing a notice of proposed rulemaking (NPRM)
with respect to this rule because it is impractical. This special local
regulation must be established by August 12, 2021, and we lack
sufficient time to provide a reasonable comment period and then
consider those comments before issuing this rule. The NPRM process
would delay the establishment of the special local regulation until
after the scheduled date of the air show and compromise public safety.
    Under 5 U.S.C. 553(d)(3), the Coast Guard finds that good cause
exists for making this rule effective less than 30 days after
publication in the Federal Register. Delaying the effective date of
this rule would be impracticable because immediate action is needed to
ensure the safety of the participants and spectators in the Owensboro
Air Show on August 12, 2021 through August 15, 2021.

III. Legal Authority and Need for Rule

    The Coast Guard is issuing this rule under authority in 46 U.S.C.
70034 (previously 33 U.S.C. 1231). The Captain of the Port Sector Ohio
Valley (COTP) has determined that potential hazards associated with the
Owensboro Air Show, will be a safety concern for anyone within the
area. This rule is needed to protect personnel, vessels, and the marine
environment in the navigable waters within the special local regulated
area for the duration of the marine event.

IV. Discussion of the Rule

    This rule establishes a temporary special local regulation from
10:30 a.m. through 6:30 p.m. on August 12, 2021 through August 15,
2021. The special local regulation will cover all navigable waters of
the Ohio River, extending the entire width, from mile marker 754.0 to
mile marker 760.0. The duration of the zone is intended to protect
personnel, vessels, and the marine environment in these navigable
waters while the Owensboro Air Show is taking place. No vessel or
person will be permitted to enter the special local regulation without
obtaining permission from the COTP or a designated representative.

V. Regulatory Analyses

    We developed this rule after considering numerous statutes and
Executive orders related to rulemaking. Below we summarize our analyses
based on a number of these statutes and Executive orders, and we
discuss First Amendment rights of protestors.

A. Regulatory Planning and Review

    Executive Orders 12866 and 13563 direct agencies to assess the
costs and benefits of available regulatory alternatives and, if
regulation is necessary, to select regulatory approaches that maximize
net benefits. This rule has not been designated a ``significant
regulatory action,'' under Executive Order 12866. Accordingly, this
rule has not been reviewed by the Office of Management and Budget
(OMB).
    This regulatory action determination is based on the size,
location, duration, and time-of-day of the special local regulation.
This special local regulation restricts transit on the Ohio River
between mile marker 754.0 and mile marker 760.0. This area will have
limited access for a period of eight hours on August 12, 2021 through
August 15, 2021. Moreover, the Coast Guard would issue Broadcast
Notices to Mariners (BNMs), Local Notices to Mariners (LNMs), and
Marine Safety Information Bulletins (MSIBs), as appropriate, about this
special local regulation so that waterway users may plan accordingly
for this short restriction on transit, and the rule would allow vessels
to request permission to enter the zone.

B. Impact on Small Entities

    The Regulatory Flexibility Act of 1980, 5 U.S.C. 601-612, as
amended, requires Federal agencies to consider the potential impact of
regulations on small entities during rulemaking. The term ``small
entities'' comprises small businesses, not-for-profit organizations
that are independently owned and operated and are not dominant in their
fields, and governmental jurisdictions with populations of less than
50,000. The Coast Guard certifies under 5 U.S.C.

605(b) that this rule will not have a significant economic impact on a
substantial number of small entities.
    While some owners or operators of vessels intending to transit the
safety zone may be small entities, for the reasons stated in section
V.A above, this rule will not have a significant economic impact on any
vessel owner or operator.
    Under section 213(a) of the Small Business Regulatory Enforcement
Fairness Act of 1996 (Pub. L. 104-121), we want to assist small
entities in understanding this rule. If the rule would affect your
small business, organization, or governmental jurisdiction and you have
questions concerning its provisions or options for compliance, please
call or email the person listed in the FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT
section.
    Small businesses may send comments on the actions of Federal
employees who enforce, or otherwise determine compliance with, Federal
regulations to the Small Business and Agriculture Regulatory
Enforcement Ombudsman and the Regional Small Business Regulatory
Fairness Boards. The Ombudsman evaluates these actions annually and
rates each agency's responsiveness to small business. If you wish to
comment on actions by employees of the Coast Guard, call 1-888-REG-FAIR
(1-888-734-3247). The Coast Guard will not retaliate against small
entities that question or complain about this rule or any policy or
action of the Coast Guard.

C. Collection of Information

    This rule will not call for a new collection of information under
the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 (44 U.S.C. 3501-3520).

D. Federalism and Indian Tribal Governments

    A rule has implications for federalism under Executive Order 13132,
Federalism, if it has a substantial direct effect on the States, on the
relationship between the National Government and the States, or on the
distribution of power and responsibilities among the various levels of
government. We have analyzed this rule under that Order and have
determined that it is consistent with the fundamental federalism
principles and preemption requirements described in Executive Order
13132.
    Also, this rule does not have tribal implications under Executive
Order 13175, Consultation and Coordination with Indian Tribal
Governments, because it does not have a substantial direct effect on
one or more Indian tribes, on the relationship between the Federal
Government and Indian tribes, or on the distribution of power and
responsibilities between the Federal Government and Indian tribes.

E. Unfunded Mandates Reform Act

    The Unfunded Mandates Reform Act of 1995 (2 U.S.C. 1531-1538)
requires Federal agencies to assess the effects of their discretionary
regulatory actions. In particular, the Act addresses actions that may
result in the expenditure by a State, local, or tribal government, in
the aggregate, or by the private sector of $100,000,000 (adjusted for
inflation) or more in any one year. Though this rule will not result in
such an expenditure, we do discuss the effects of this rule elsewhere
in this preamble.

F. Environment

    We have analyzed this rule under Department of Homeland Security
Directive 023-01, Rev. 1, associated implementing instructions, and
Environmental Planning COMDTINST 5090.1 (series), which guide the Coast
Guard in complying with the National Environmental Policy Act of 1969
(42 U.S.C. 4321-4370f), and have determined that this action is one of
a category of actions that do not individually or cumulatively have a
significant effect on the human environment. This rule involves a
special local regulation lasting eight hours for four days that will
prohibit entry on a six mile stretch of the Ohio River. It is
categorically excluded from further review under paragraph L61 of
Appendix A, Table 1 of DHS Instruction Manual 023-01-001-01, Rev. 1.

G. Protest Activities

    The Coast Guard respects the First Amendment rights of protesters.
Protesters are asked to call or email the person listed in the FOR
FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT section to coordinate protest activities so
that your message can be received without jeopardizing the safety or
security of people, places or vessels.

List of Subjects in 33 CFR Part 100

    Marine safety, Navigation (water), Reporting and recordkeeping
requirements, Security measures, Waterways.

    For the reasons discussed in the preamble, the Coast Guard amends
33 CFR part 100 as follows:

PART 100--SAFETY OF LIFE ON NAVIGABLE WATERS

0
1. The authority citation for part 100 continues to read as follows:

    Authority: 46 U.S.C. 70041; 33 CFR 1.05-1.

0
2. Add Sec.  100.T08-0550 to read as follows:

Sec.  100.T08-0550  Owensboro, KY. Ohio River.

    (a) Regulated area. The regulations in this section apply to the
following area: All navigable waters of the Ohio River between mile
754.0 and 760.0
    (b) Regulations. (1) All non-participants are prohibited from
entering, transiting through, anchoring in, or remaining within the
regulated area described in paragraph (a) of this section unless
authorized by the Captain of the Port Sector Ohio Valley or their
designated representative.
    (2) To seek permission to enter, contact the COTP or the COTP's
representative by Sector Ohio Valley command center at<PHONE_NUMBER>.
Those in the regulated area must comply with all lawful orders or
directions given to them by the COTP or the designated representative.
    (3) The COTP will provide notice of the regulated area through
advanced notice via broadcast notice to mariners and by on-scene
designated representatives.
    (c) Enforcement period. This section will be enforced from 10:30
a.m. through 6:30 p.m. on August 12, 2021 through August 15, 2021.

    Dated: August 3, 2021.
A.M. Beach,
Captain, U.S. Coast Guard, Captain of the Port Sector Ohio Valley.
[FR Doc. 2021-16999 Filed 8-10-21; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 9110-04-P


[Federal Register Volume 82, Number 104 (Thursday, June 1, 2017)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Pages 25203-25204]
[FR Doc No: 2017-10942]

========================================================================
Rules and Regulations
                                                Federal Register
________________________________________________________________________

This section of the FEDERAL REGISTER contains regulatory documents
having general applicability and legal effect, most of which are keyed
to and codified in the Code of Federal Regulations, which is published
under 50 titles pursuant to 44 U.S.C. 1510.

The Code of Federal Regulations is sold by the Superintendent of Documents.

========================================================================

Federal Register / Vol. 82, No. 104 / Thursday, June 1, 2017 / Rules
and Regulations

ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY

40 CFR Part 52

[EPA-R09-OAR-2017-0255; FRL-9963-07-Region 9]

Determination To Defer Sanctions; Arizona Department of
Environmental Quality

AGENCY: Environmental Protection Agency (EPA).

ACTION: Interim final rule.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The EPA is making an interim final determination to defer
imposition of sanctions based on a proposed determination, published
elsewhere in this Federal Register, that the State of Arizona (State)
has submitted rules that satisfy the requirements of part D of the
Clean Air Act (CAA or Act) permitting program for areas under the
jurisdiction of the Arizona Department of Environmental Quality (ADEQ).

DATES: This interim final determination is effective on June 1, 2017.
However, comments will be accepted until July 3, 2017.

ADDRESSES: Submit comments, identified by Docket ID No. EPA-R09-OAR-
2017-0255, at http://www.regulations.gov, or via email to
<EMAIL_ADDRESS>For comments submitted at Regulations.gov, follow
the online instructions for submitting comments. Once submitted,
comments cannot be removed or edited from Regulations.gov. For either
manner of submission, the EPA may publish any comment received to its
public docket. Do not submit electronically any information you
consider to be Confidential Business Information (CBI) or other
information whose disclosure is restricted by statute. Multimedia
submissions (audio, video, etc.) must be accompanied by a written
comment. The written comment is considered the official comment and
should include discussion of all points you wish to make. The EPA will
generally not consider comments or comment contents located outside of
the primary submission (i.e. on the web, cloud, or other file sharing
system). For additional submission methods, please contact the person
identified in the FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT section. For the full
EPA public comment policy, information about CBI or multimedia
submissions, and general guidance on making effective comments, please
visit https://www.epa.gov/dockets/commenting-epa-dockets.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Lisa Beckham, EPA Region 9, (415) 972-
3811<EMAIL_ADDRESS>
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Throughout this document, the terms ``we,''
``us,'' and ``our'' refer to the EPA.

Table of Contents

I. Background
II. EPA Action
III. Statutory and Executive Order Reviews

I. Background

    On November 2, 2015 (80 FR 67319), the EPA issued a final limited
approval and limited disapproval action for revisions to the ADEQ
portion of the Arizona State Implementation Plan (SIP) that had been
submitted by ADEQ to the EPA for approval (the 2015 NSR action).\1\ The
2015 NSR action addressed ADEQ's permitting program for the issuance of
New Source Review (NSR) permits for stationary sources, including
review and permitting of major and minor sources under the Act. In our
2015 NSR action, we determined that while ADEQ's SIP revision submittal
strengthened the Arizona SIP, the submittal did not fully meet the
requirements for NSR permitting programs under the CAA. Our 2015 NSR
action included a final limited disapproval action under title I, part
D of the Act, relating to requirements for nonattainment areas.
Pursuant to section 179 of the CAA and our regulations at 40 CFR 52.31,
this limited disapproval action under title I, part D started a
sanctions clock for imposition of offset sanctions 18 months after the
action's effective date of December 2, 2015, and highway sanctions 6
months later.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \1\ We also finalized other actions, which included a partial
disapproval related to the PM2.5 significant monitoring
concentration, and limited approvals, without corresponding limited
disapprovals, related to section 189(e) of the Act.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    On March 21, 2017, ADEQ revised its NSR permitting program rules
and on April 28, 2017, ADEQ submitted a number of revised NSR
permitting rules to the EPA for approval into the Arizona SIP (April
2017 NSR submittal), including rules intended to address the limited
disapproval issues under title I, part D that we identified in our 2015
NSR action. In the Proposed Rules section of this Federal Register, we
have proposed approval of ADEQ's April 2017 NSR submittal. Based on the
proposed approval action, we are also taking this final rulemaking
action, effective on publication, to defer imposition of the offset
sanctions and highway sanctions that were triggered by our 2015 NSR
action's limited disapproval of ADEQ's NSR permitting program, because
we believe that ADEQ's April 2017 NSR submittal corrects the
deficiencies that triggered such sanctions.
    EPA is providing the public with an opportunity to comment on this
deferral of sanctions. If comments are submitted that change our
assessment described in this final determination and the proposed full
approval of ADEQ's April 2017 NSR submittal with respect to the title
I, part D deficiencies identified as limited disapproval issues in our
2015 NSR action, we would take final action proposing to lift this
deferral of sanctions under 40 CFR 52.31. If no comments are submitted
that change our assessment, then all sanctions and any sanction clocks
triggered by our 2015 NSR action would be permanently terminated on the
effective date of our final approval of ADEQ's April 2017 NSR
submittal.

II. EPA Action

    We are making an interim final determination to defer CAA section
179 sanctions associated with our limited disapproval action on
November 2, 2015 of ADEQ's NSR permitting program with respect to the
requirements of part D of title I of the CAA. This determination is
based on our concurrent proposal to fully approve ADEQ's April 2017 NSR
submittal, which resolves the deficiencies that triggered sanctions
under section 179 of the CAA.
    Because the EPA has preliminarily determined that ADEQ's April 2017
NSR submittal addresses the

deficiencies under part D of title I of the CAA identified as limited
disapproval issues in our 2015 NSR action, and is fully approvable,
relief from sanctions should be provided as quickly as possible.
Therefore, the EPA is invoking the good cause exception under the
Administrative Procedure Act (APA) in not providing an opportunity for
comment before this action takes effect (5 U.S.C. 553(b)(3)). However,
by this action, the EPA is providing the public with a chance to
comment on the EPA's determination after the effective date, and the
EPA will consider any comments received in determining whether to
reverse such action.
    The EPA believes that notice-and-comment rulemaking before the
effective date of this action is impracticable and contrary to the
public interest. The EPA has reviewed the State's submittal and,
through its proposed action, is indicating that it is more likely than
not that the State has submitted a revision to the SIP that corrects
deficiencies under part D of the Act that were the basis for the action
that started the sanctions clocks. Therefore, it is not in the public
interest to impose sanctions. The EPA believes that it is necessary to
use the interim final rulemaking process to defer sanctions while the
EPA completes its rulemaking process on the approvability of the
State's submittal. Moreover, with respect to the effective date of this
action, the EPA is invoking the good cause exception to the 30-day
notice requirement of the APA because the purpose of this notice is to
relieve a restriction (5 U.S.C. 553(d)(1)).

III. Statutory and Executive Order Reviews

    This action defers sanctions and imposes no additional
requirements.

A. Executive Order 12866: Regulatory Planning and Review and Executive
Order 13563: Improving Regulation and Regulatory Review

    This action is not a significant regulatory action and was
therefore not submitted to the Office of Management and Budget (OMB)
for review.

B. Paperwork Reduction Act (PRA)

    This action does not impose an information collection burden under
the PRA. This action defers sanctions and imposes no new requirements.

C. Regulatory Flexibility Act (RFA)

    I certify that this action will not have a significant economic
impact on a substantial number of small entities under the RFA. This
action will not impose any requirements on small entities. This action
defers sanctions and imposes no new requirements.

D. Unfunded Mandates Reform Act (UMRA)

    This action does not contain any unfunded mandate as described in
UMRA, 2 U.S.C. 1531-1538, and does not significantly or uniquely affect
small governments. The action imposes no enforceable duty on any state,
local or tribal governments or the private sector.

E. Executive Order 13132: Federalism

    This action does not have federalism implications. It will not have
substantial direct effects on the states, on the relationship between
the national government and the states, or on the distribution of power
and responsibilities among the various levels of government.

F. Executive Order 13175: Consultation and Coordination With Indian
Tribal Governments

    This action does not have tribal implications as specified in
Executive Order 13175. This action defers sanctions and imposes no new
requirements. In addition, this action does not apply on any Indian
reservation land or in any other area where the EPA or an Indian tribe
has demonstrated that a tribe has jurisdiction. Thus, Executive Order
13175 does not apply to this action.

G. Executive Order 13045: Protection of Children From Environmental
Health Risks and Safety Risks

    The EPA interprets Executive Order 13045 as applying only to those
regulatory actions that concern environmental health or safety risks
that the EPA has reason to believe may disproportionately affect
children, per the definition of ``covered regulatory action'' in
section 2-202 of the Executive Order. This rule is not subject to
Executive Order 13045 because it does not concern an environmental
health risk or safety risk.

H. Executive Order 13211: Actions That Significantly Affect Energy
Supply, Distribution, or Use

    This rule is not subject to Executive Order 13211, because it is
not a significant regulatory action under Executive Order 12866.

I. National Technology Transfer and Advancement Act

    This rulemaking does not involve technical standards.

J. Executive Order 12898: Federal Actions To Address Environmental
Justice in Minority Populations and Low-Income Populations

    The EPA believes that this action is not subject to Executive Order
12898 (59 FR 7629, February 16, 1994) because it does not establish an
environmental health or safety standard. This action defers sanctions
in accordance with CAA regulatory provisions and imposes no additional
requirements.

K. Congressional Review Act (CRA)

    This action is subject to the CRA, and the EPA will submit a rule
report to each House of the Congress and to the Comptroller General of
the United States. The CRA allows the issuing agency to make a rule
effective sooner than otherwise provided by the CRA if the agency makes
a good cause finding that notice and comment rulemaking procedures are
impracticable, unnecessary or contrary to the public interest (5 U.S.C.
808(2)). The EPA has made a good cause finding for this rule as
discussed in section II of this preamble, including the basis for that
finding.
    Under section 307(b)(1) of the CAA, petitions for judicial review
of this action must be filed in the United States Court of Appeals for
the appropriate circuit by July 31, 2017. Filing a petition for
reconsideration by the EPA Administrator of this final rule does not
affect the finality of this rule for the purpose of judicial review nor
does it extend the time within which petition for judicial review may
be filed, and shall not postpone the effectiveness of such rule or
action. This action may not be challenged later in proceedings to
enforce its requirements (see CAA section 307(b)(2)).

List of Subjects in 40 CFR Part 52

    Environmental protection, Administrative practice and procedure,
Air pollution control, Carbon monoxide, Incorporation by reference,
Intergovernmental relations, Lead, Nitrogen dioxide, Ozone, Particulate
matter, Reporting and recordkeeping requirements, Sulfur dioxide,
Volatile organic compounds.

    Authority:  42 U.S.C. 7401 et seq.

    Dated: May 16, 2017.
Alexis Strauss,
Acting Regional Administrator, Region IX.
[FR Doc. 2017-10942 Filed 5-31-17; 8:45 am]
 BILLING CODE 6560-50-P


[Federal Register Volume 86, Number 127 (Wednesday, July 7, 2021)]
[Proposed Rules]
[Pages 35697-35700]
[FR Doc No: 2021-14360]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION

Federal Aviation Administration

14 CFR Part 39

[Docket No. FAA-2021-0548; Project Identifier MCAI-2021-00046-T]
RIN 2120-AA64

Airworthiness Directives; ATR-GIE Avions de Transport
R[eacute]gional Airplanes

AGENCY: Federal Aviation Administration (FAA), DOT.

ACTION: Notice of proposed rulemaking (NPRM).

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The FAA proposes to adopt a new airworthiness directive (AD)
for all ATR-GIE Avions de Transport R[eacute]gional Model ATR42-500 and
ATR72-212A airplanes. This proposed AD was prompted by reports
indicating that certain Thales global positioning system (GPS)
satellite based augmentation system (SBAS) receivers provided, under
certain conditions, erroneous outputs on aircraft positions. This
proposed AD would require replacing affected GPS SBAS receivers with
new, improved receivers, as specified in a European Union Aviation
Safety Agency (EASA) AD, which is proposed for incorporation by
reference. The FAA is proposing this AD to address the unsafe condition
on these products.

DATES: The FAA must receive comments on this proposed AD by August 23,
2021.

ADDRESSES: You may send comments, using the procedures found in 14 CFR
11.43 and 11.45, by any of the following methods:
     Federal eRulemaking Portal: Go to https://www.regulations.gov. Follow the instructions for submitting comments.
     Fax:<PHONE_NUMBER>.
     Mail: U.S. Department of Transportation, Docket
Operations, M-30, West Building Ground Floor, Room W12-140, 1200 New
Jersey Avenue SE, Washington, DC 20590.
     Hand Delivery: Deliver to Mail address above between 9
a.m. and 5 p.m., Monday through Friday, except Federal holidays.
    For material that will be incorporated by reference (IBR) in this
AD, contact EASA, Konrad-Adenauer-Ufer 3, 50668 Cologne, Germany;
telephone +49 221 8999 000; email<EMAIL_ADDRESS>internet
www.easa.europa.eu. You may find this IBR material on the EASA website
at https://ad.easa.europa.eu. You may view this IBR material at the
FAA, Airworthiness Products Section, Operational Safety Branch, 2200
South 216th St., Des Moines, WA. For information on the availability of
this material at the FAA, call<PHONE_NUMBER>. It is also available in
the AD docket on the internet at https://www.regulations.gov by
searching for and locating Docket No. FAA-2021-0548.

Examining the AD Docket

    You may examine the AD docket on the internet at https://www.regulations.gov by searching for and locating Docket No. FAA-2021-
0548; or in person at Docket Operations between 9 a.m. and 5 p.m.,
Monday through Friday, except Federal holidays. The AD docket contains
this NPRM, any comments received, and other information. The street
address for Docket Operations is listed above.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Shahram Daneshmandi, Aerospace
Engineer, Large Aircraft Section, International Validation Branch, FAA,
2200 South 216th St., Des Moines, WA 98198; phone and fax: 206-231-
3220; email<EMAIL_ADDRESS>
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

Comments Invited

    The FAA invites you to send any written relevant data, views, or
arguments about this proposal. Send your comments to an address listed
under ADDRESSES. Include ``Docket No. FAA-2021-0548; Project Identifier
MCAI-2021-00046-T'' at the beginning of your comments. The most helpful
comments reference a specific portion of the proposal, explain the
reason for any recommended change, and include supporting data. The FAA
will consider all comments received by the closing date and may amend
the proposal because of those comments.
    Except for Confidential Business Information (CBI) as described in
the following paragraph, and other information as described in 14 CFR
11.35, the FAA will post all comments received, without change, to
https://www.regulations.gov, including any personal information you
provide. The agency will also post a report summarizing each
substantive verbal contact received about this proposed AD.

Confidential Business Information

    CBI is commercial or financial information that is both customarily
and actually treated as private by its owner. Under the Freedom of
Information Act (FOIA) (5 U.S.C. 552), CBI is exempt from public
disclosure. If your comments responsive to this NPRM contain commercial
or financial information that is customarily treated as private, that
you actually treat as private, and that is relevant or responsive to
this NPRM, it is important that you clearly designate the submitted
comments as CBI. Please mark each page of your submission containing
CBI as ``PROPIN.'' The FAA will treat such marked submissions as
confidential under the FOIA, and they will not be placed in the public
docket of this NPRM. Submissions containing CBI should be sent to
Shahram Daneshmandi, Aerospace Engineer, Large Aircraft Section,
International

Validation Branch, FAA, 2200 South 216th St., Des Moines, WA 98198;
phone and fax:<PHONE_NUMBER>; email<EMAIL_ADDRESS>Any
commentary that the FAA receives which is not specifically designated
as CBI will be placed in the public docket for this rulemaking.

Background

    EASA, which is the Technical Agent for the Member States of the
European Union, has issued EASA AD 2021-0013, dated January 13, 2021
(EASA AD 2021-0013) (also referred to as the Mandatory Continuing
Airworthiness Information, or the MCAI), to correct an unsafe condition
for all ATR-GIE Avions de Transport R[eacute]gional Model ATR42-500 and
ATR72-212A airplanes.
    This proposed AD was prompted by reports indicating that Thales GPS
SBAS receivers provided, under certain conditions, erroneous outputs on
aircraft positions. The manufacturer developed a new, improved receiver
which incorporates improved software and ensures correct navigational
performance. The FAA is proposing this AD to address erroneous aircraft
position outputs from the GPS SBAS receivers, which could result in
controlled flight into terrain, and consequent loss of control of the
airplane.
    Although paragraphs (2) and (3) of EASA AD 2021-0013 require
amending the applicable AFM, the FAA has determined that this
requirement is not necessary. The FAA received verification from the
manufacturer that the unsafe condition in this proposed AD will be
addressed by replacing the GPS SBAS receivers with new, improved
receivers. However, the GPS procedures added to the AFM as required by
AD 2020-08-02, Amendment 39-21108 (85 FR 20586, April 14, 2020) (AD
2020-08-02), must be removed, as specified in paragraph (h)(2) of this
proposed AD.
    See the MCAI for additional background information.

Related AD

    AD 2020-08-02 applies to certain Thales GPS SBAS receivers
installed on airplanes (including Model ATR42-500 and ATR72-212A) and
helicopters. AD 2020-08-02 requires the installation of a software
update to the aircraft navigation database and insertion of a change to
the applicable airplane flight manual (AFM). The FAA issued AD 2020-08-
02 to address erroneous aircraft position outputs from the affected
Thales GPS SBAS receivers, which could result in controlled flight into
terrain and loss of the aircraft. AD 2020-08-02 corresponds to EASA AD
2019-0004, dated January 11, 2019. Upon completion of EASA AD 2021-0013
by Model ATR42-500 and ATR72-212A airplanes, all requirements of EASA
2019-0004 are effectively terminated for those airplanes.

Related Service Information Under 1 CFR Part 51

    EASA AD 2021-0013 describes procedures for replacing certain GPS
SBAS receivers with new, improved receivers. This material is
reasonably available because the interested parties have access to it
through their normal course of business or by the means identified in
the ADDRESSES section.

FAA's Determination and Requirements of This Proposed AD

    This product has been approved by the aviation authority of another
country, and is approved for operation in the United States. Pursuant
to the FAA's bilateral agreement with the State of Design Authority,
the FAA has been notified of the unsafe condition described in the MCAI
referenced above. The FAA is proposing this AD because the FAA
evaluated all the relevant information and determined the unsafe
condition described previously is likely to exist or develop in other
products of the same type design.

Proposed AD Requirements

    This proposed AD would require accomplishing the actions specified
in EASA AD 2021-0013 described previously, as incorporated by
reference, except for any differences identified as exceptions in the
regulatory text of this AD, and except as discussed under ``Difference
Between this Proposed AD and the MCAI.'' Accomplishment of the
requirements of this AD would terminate all requirements of AD 2020-08-
02 for Model ATR42-500 and ATR72-212A airplanes.

Difference Between This Proposed AD and the MCAI

    Although certain service information specified in EASA AD 2021-0013
specifies the inclusion of MOD 10046 in the AFM List of Modifications
(LOM), this proposed AD does not include this requirement. Instead,
after accomplishment of the actions in this proposed AD, operators
would be required to remove the AFM revisions for the GPS reset
procedures that are required by FAA AD 2020-08-02, because the unsafe
condition in this proposed AD will be addressed by the GPS SBAS
receiver replacement. This difference has been coordinated with ATR and
EASA.

Explanation of Required Compliance Information

    In the FAA's ongoing efforts to improve the efficiency of the AD
process, the FAA initially worked with Airbus and EASA to develop a
process to use certain EASA ADs as the primary source of information
for compliance with requirements for corresponding FAA ADs. The FAA has
since coordinated with other manufacturers and civil aviation
authorities (CAAs) to use this process. As a result, EASA AD 2021-0013
will be incorporated by reference in the FAA final rule. This proposed
AD would, therefore, require compliance with EASA AD 2021-0013 in its
entirety, through that incorporation, except for any differences
identified as exceptions in the regulatory text of this proposed AD.
Using common terms that are the same as the heading of a particular
section in the EASA AD does not mean that operators need comply only
with that section. For example, where the AD requirement refers to
``all required actions and compliance times,'' compliance with this AD
requirement is not limited to the section titled ``Required Action(s)
and Compliance Time(s)'' in the EASA AD. Service information specified
in EASA AD 2021-0013 that is required for compliance with EASA AD 2021-
0013 will be available on the internet at https://www.regulations.gov
by searching for and locating Docket No. FAA-2021-0548 after the FAA
final rule is published.

Costs of Compliance

    The FAA estimates that this proposed AD affects 15 airplanes of
U.S. registry. The FAA estimates the following costs to comply with
this proposed AD:

                                      Estimated Costs for Required Actions
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
                                                                                Cost per       Cost on U.S.
                          Labor cost                              Parts cost        product         operators
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
2 work-hours x $85 per hour = $170...........................            $0 *             $170           $2,550
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
* The manufacturer will provide replacement receivers at no cost to the operators. The FAA has received no
  definitive data on which to base the cost estimates for these parts.

Authority for This Rulemaking

    Title 49 of the United States Code specifies the FAA's authority to
issue rules on aviation safety. Subtitle I, section 106, describes the
authority of the FAA Administrator. Subtitle VII: Aviation Programs,
describes in more detail the scope of the Agency's authority.
    The FAA is issuing this rulemaking under the authority described in
Subtitle VII, Part A, Subpart III, Section 44701: General requirements.
Under that section, Congress charges the FAA with promoting safe flight
of civil aircraft in air commerce by prescribing regulations for
practices, methods, and procedures the Administrator finds necessary
for safety in air commerce. This regulation is within the scope of that
authority because it addresses an unsafe condition that is likely to
exist or develop on products identified in this rulemaking action.

Regulatory Findings

    The FAA determined that this proposed AD would not have federalism
implications under Executive Order 13132. This proposed AD would not
have a substantial direct effect on the States, on the relationship
between the national Government and the States, or on the distribution
of power and responsibilities among the various levels of government.
    For the reasons discussed above, I certify this proposed
regulation:
    (1) Is not a ``significant regulatory action'' under Executive
Order 12866,
    (2) Would not affect intrastate aviation in Alaska, and
    (3) Would not have a significant economic impact, positive or
negative, on a substantial number of small entities under the criteria
of the Regulatory Flexibility Act.

List of Subjects in 14 CFR Part 39

    Air transportation, Aircraft, Aviation safety, Incorporation by
reference, Safety.

The Proposed Amendment

    Accordingly, under the authority delegated to me by the
Administrator, the FAA proposes to amend 14 CFR part 39 as follows:

PART 39--AIRWORTHINESS DIRECTIVES

0
1. The authority citation for part 39 continues to read as follows:

    Authority:  49 U.S.C. 106(g), 40113, 44701.

Sec.  39.13  [Amended]

0
2. The FAA amends Sec.  39.13 by adding the following new airworthiness
directive (AD):

ATR-GIE Avions de Transport R[eacute]gional: Docket No. FAA-2021-
0548; Project Identifier MCAI-2021-00046-T.

(a) Comments Due Date

    The FAA must receive comments by August 23, 2021.

(b) Affected Airworthiness Directives (ADs)

    This AD affects AD 2020-08-02, Amendment 39-21108 (85 FR 20586,
April 14, 2020) (AD 2020-08-02).

(c) Applicability

    This AD applies to all ATR-GIE Avions de Transport
R[eacute]gional Model ATR42-500 and ATR72-212A airplanes,
certificated in any category.

(d) Subject

    Air Transport Association (ATA) of America Code 34, Navigation.

(e) Reason

    This AD was prompted by reports that Thales global positioning
system (GPS) satellite based augmentation system (SBAS) receivers
provided, under certain conditions, erroneous outputs on aircraft
positions. The FAA is issuing this AD to address the potential for
these erroneous outputs, which could result in controlled flight
into terrain, and consequent loss of control of the airplane.

(f) Compliance

    Comply with this AD within the compliance times specified,
unless already done.

(g) Requirements

    Except as specified in paragraph (h) of this AD: Comply with all
required actions and compliance times specified in, and in
accordance with, European Union Aviation Safety Agency (EASA) AD
2021-0013, dated January 13, 2021 (EASA AD 2021-0013).

(h) Exceptions to EASA AD 2021-0013

    (1) Where EASA AD 2021-0013 refers to its effective date, this
AD requires using the effective date of this AD.
    (2) The requirements specified in paragraphs (2) and (3) of EASA
AD 2021-0013 do not apply to this AD. Instead, the AFM changes
required by AD 2020-08-02 must be removed from the existing AFM
before further flight after compliance with all other actions
required by this AD.
    (3) The ``Remarks'' section of EASA AD 2021-0013 does not apply
to this AD.

(i) Terminating Action for AD 2020-08-02

    Accomplishment of this AD terminates all requirements of AD
2020-08-02 for Model ATR42-500 and ATR72-212A airplanes.

(j) Other FAA AD Provisions

    The following provisions also apply to this AD:
    (1) Alternative Methods of Compliance (AMOCs): The Manager,
Large Aircraft Section, International Validation Branch, FAA, has
the authority to approve AMOCs for this AD, if requested using the
procedures found in 14 CFR 39.19. In accordance with 14 CFR 39.19,
send your request to your principal inspector or responsible Flight
Standards Office, as appropriate. If sending information directly to
the Large Aircraft Section, International Validation Branch, send it
to the attention of the person identified in paragraph (k)(2) of
this AD. Information may be emailed to<EMAIL_ADDRESS>
Before using any approved AMOC, notify your appropriate principal
inspector, or lacking a principal inspector, the manager of the
responsible Flight Standards Office.
    (2) Contacting the Manufacturer: For any requirement in this AD
to obtain instructions from a manufacturer, the instructions must be
accomplished using a method approved by the Manager, Large Aircraft
Section, International Validation Branch, FAA; or EASA; or ATR-GIE
Avions de Transport R[eacute]gional's EASA Design Organization
Approval (DOA). If approved by the DOA, the approval must include
the DOA-authorized signature.

(k) Related Information

    (1) For information about EASA AD 2021-0013, contact EASA,
Konrad-Adenauer-Ufer 3, 50668 Cologne, Germany; telephone +49 221
8999 000; email<EMAIL_ADDRESS>internet www.easa.europa.eu. You
may find this EASA AD on the EASA website at https://ad.easa.europa.eu. You may view this material at the FAA,
Airworthiness Products Section, Operational Safety Branch, 2200
South 216th St., Des Moines, WA. For information on the availability
of this material at the FAA, call<PHONE_NUMBER>. This material may be
found in the AD docket on the internet at https://www.regulations.gov by searching for and locating Docket No. FAA-
2021-0548.
    (2) For more information about this AD, contact Shahram
Daneshmandi, Aerospace

Engineer, Large Aircraft Section, International Validation Branch,
FAA, 2200 South 216th St., Des Moines, WA 98198; phone and fax: 206-
231-3220; email<EMAIL_ADDRESS>
    Issued on June 30, 2021.
Gaetano A. Sciortino,
Deputy Director for Strategic Initiatives, Compliance & Airworthiness
Division, Aircraft Certification Service.
[FR Doc. 2021-14360 Filed 7-6-21; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910-13-P