[Federal Register Volume 83, Number 85 (Wednesday, May 2, 2018)]
[Notices]
[Pages 19282-19283]
[FR Doc No: 2018-09322]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY

[EPA-R09-SFUND-2018-07; FRL-9977-39--Region 9]

Ecology Control Industries, Inc. Removal Site, Torrance, CA;
Notice of Proposed Settlement Agreement and Order on Consent

AGENCY: Environmental Protection Agency (EPA).

ACTION: Notice of proposed settlement.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: This notice announces the availability for review and comment
of a proposed administrative settlement agreement under the
Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation, and Liability Act
of 1980, as amended (``CERCLA''), between the U.S. Environmental
Protection Agency (``EPA''), and Bridge Point South Bay II, LLC
(``Bridge Point LLC''), regarding the Ecology Control Industries, Inc.
Removal Site (``ECI Site'') in Torrance, California. The Settlement
Agreement requires the purchaser to conduct a removal action to address
soil contamination at the ECI Site.

DATES: Comments must be received on or before June 1, 2018.

ADDRESSES: Submit your comments, identified by Docket ID No. EPA-R09-
SFUND-2018-07, to the Federal eRulemaking Portal: http://www.regulations.gov. Follow the online instructions for submitting
comments. Once submitted, comments cannot be edited or withdrawn. The
EPA may publish any comment received to its public docket. Do not
submit electronically any information you consider to be Confidential
Business Information (CBI) or other information whose disclosure is
restricted by statute. Multimedia submissions (audio, video, etc.) must
be accompanied by a written comment. The written comment is considered
the official comment and should include discussion of all points you
wish to make. The EPA will generally not consider comments or comment
contents located outside of the primary submission (i.e. on the web,
cloud, or other file sharing system). For additional submission
methods, the full EPA public comment policy, information about CBI or
multimedia submissions, and general guidance on making effective
comments, please visit http://www2.epa.gov/dockets/commenting-epa-dockets.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Xiao Zhang, Assistant Regional
Counsel, Office of Regional Counsel (ORC-3), Environmental Protection
Agency,

Region 9, 75 Hawthorne Street, San Francisco, CA 94105; tel: (415) 972-
3266; fax:<PHONE_NUMBER>; [email protected].

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Bridge Point LLC is agreeing to perform a
removal action to address soils contaminated with the pesticide
dichlorodiphenyl-trichloroethane (DDT). The removal action will reduce
the risk to future users of the property and the surrounding community
from exposure to contamination primarily caused by historical DDT
manufacturing operations at a nearby plant. Under the terms of the
settlement, Bridge Point LLC will complete the removal action and pay
EPA's costs for oversight of the cleanup activities. In exchange,
Bridge Point LLC will receive a covenant not to sue from the United
States. EPA will consider all comments submitted by the date set forth
above and may modify or withdraw its consent to the settlement if
comments received disclose facts or considerations that indicate the
proposed settlement is inappropriate, improper, or inadequate.

    Dated: April 10, 2018.
Enrique Manzanilla,
Director, Superfund Division, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency,
Region 9.
[FR Doc. 2018-09322 Filed 5-1-18; 8:45 am]
 BILLING CODE 6560-50-P


Telephone # 703 308 8000 Fax # 703 308 8005 E mail: Edwards. Debbie@ epa. gov UNITED STATES ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY WASHINGTON, D. C. 20460 OFFICE OF PREVENTION, PESTICIDES AND TOXIC SUBSTANCES OFFICE OF PESTICIDE PROGRAMS SPECIAL REVIEW and REREGISTRATION DIVISION ( 7508C)

Debra Edwards, Ph. D., Director April 12, 2006 CERTIFIED MAIL Lynn Bergeson Bergeson & Campbell, PC 1203 19th Street, NW, Suite 300 Washington, DC 20036 2401 Re: CBI Claims in March 27, 2006 Letter Dear Ms. Bergeson:

Pursuant to 40 C. F. R 2.204( a)( 2), the EPA Office of Pesticide Programs is affording you an opportunity to substantiate your confidentiality claim with respect to your March 27, 2006 letter regarding the preliminary risk assessments for the organic arsenic herbicides, a copy of which is enclosed. The EPA Office of General Counsel will be making a final confidentiality determination concerning this information. For each portion or category of information that you identify as being subject to a claim, please answer the following questions:

l. For what period of time do you request that the information be maintained as confidential? If the occurrence of a specific event will eliminate the need for confidentiality, please specify that event.

2. Information submitted to EPA becomes stale over time. Why should the information you claim as confidential be protected for the time period specified in your answer to question # 1?

3. What measures have you taken to protect the information claimed as confidential? Have you disclosed the information to anyone other than a governmental body or Telephone # 703 308 8000 Fax # 703 308 8005 E mail: Edwards. Debbie@ epa. gov someone who is bound by an agreement not to disclose the information further? If so, why should the information still be considered confidential?

4. Has any governmental body made a determination as to the confidentiality of the information? If so, please attach a copy of the determination.

5. Is the information contained in any publicly available material such as promotional publications, annual reports, articles, etc.? Is there any means by which a member of the public could obtain access to the information?

6. For each category of information claimed as confidential, discuss with specificity why release of the information is likely to cause substantial harm to your competitive position. Explain the nature of those harmful effects, why they should be viewed as substantial, and the causal relationship between disclosure and such harmful effects. How could your competitors make use of this information to your detriment?

7. Do you assert that the information is " voluntarily submitted" as defined at 40 C. F. R. 2.201( i)? If so, explain why, and how disclosure would tend to lessen EPA's ability to obtain similar information in the future.

8. Any other issue you deem relevant.

Please note that you bear the burden of substantiating your confidentiality claim pursuant to 40 CFR 2.208( e). Conclusory allegations will be given little or no weight in the determination. If you wish to claim any information in your response to this letter as confidential, you must mark the response " CONFIDENTIAL" or with a similar designation, and must bracket all text so claimed. Information so designated will be disclosed by EPA only to the extent allowed by, and by means of the procedures set forth in, 40 CFR Part 2. If you fail to claim the information as confidential upon submission, it may be made available to the public without further notice to you. Your reply can be mailed to the following address:

Debra Edwards, Director Special Review and Reregistration Division ( 7508C) Office of Pesticide Programs U. S. Environmental Protection Agency 1200 Pennsylvania Ave., NW Washington D. C. 20460 Your comments must be postmarked by the 15th working day after your receipt of this letter. If you intend to submit timely comments, please notify Lance Wormell by phone ( 703 603 0523), by fax ( 703 308 8041), by email ( Wormell. Lance@ epa. gov), or by mail at the address above. EPA will only inquire into the whereabouts of comments not received if notice of your intention to submit them was provided. Failure to submit Telephone # 703 308 8000 Fax # 703 308 8005 E mail: Edwards. Debbie@ epa. gov timely comments will be regarded as a waiver of your confidentiality claim. You may request an extension of the 15 day deadline. Should you have any questions in this matter, please contact Lance Wormell.

Sincerely,

Debra Edwards, Ph. D. Director Enclosure


[Federal Register Volume 78, Number 127 (Tuesday, July 2, 2013)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Pages 39604-39606]
[FR Doc No: 2013-15822]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY

Coast Guard

33 CFR Part 165

[Docket No. USCG-2013-0439]
RIN 1625-AA00

Safety Zone; Northside Park Pier Fireworks Display, Assawoman
Bay, Ocean City, MD

AGENCY: Coast Guard, DHS.

ACTION: Temporary final rule.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Coast Guard is establishing a temporary safety zone on the
navigable waters of Assawoman Bay in Ocean City, MD to support the
Northside Park Pier Fireworks. This action is intended to restrict
vessel traffic movement in the designated area in order to protect the
life and property of the maritime public and spectators from the
hazards associated with fireworks displays.

DATES: This safety zone is effective from 8:45 p.m. on July 14, 2013,
until 9:45 p.m. on August 25, 2013. This safety zone will be enforced
from 8:45 p.m. to 9:45 p.m. on the dates listed below in the
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION section.

ADDRESSES: Documents indicated in this preamble as being available in
the docket are part of docket USCG-2013-0439 and are available online
by going to http://www.regulations.gov, inserting USCG-2013-0439 in the
``SEARCH'' box, and then clicking ``Search.'' They are also available
for inspection or copying at the Docket Management Facility (M-30),
U.S. Department of Transportation, West Building Ground Floor, Room
W12-140, 1200 New Jersey Avenue SE., Washington, DC 20590, between 9
a.m. and 5 p.m., Monday through Friday, except Federal holidays.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: If you have questions on this
temporary rule, call or email LCDR Hector Cintron, Waterways Management
Division Chief, Sector Hampton Roads, Coast Guard; telephone 757-668-
5581, email<EMAIL_ADDRESS>If you have questions on viewing
the docket, call Barbara Hairston, Program Manager, Docket Operations,
telephone<PHONE_NUMBER>.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

A. Regulatory History and Information

    The Coast Guard is issuing this temporary final rule without prior
notice and opportunity to comment pursuant to authority under section
4(a) of the Administrative Procedure Act (APA) (5 U.S.C. 553(b)). This
provision authorizes an agency to issue a rule without prior notice and
opportunity to comment when the agency for good cause finds that those
procedures are ``impracticable, unnecessary, or contrary to the public
interest.'' Under 5 U.S.C. 553(b)(B), the Coast Guard finds that good
cause exists for not publishing a notice of proposed rulemaking (NPRM)
with respect to this rule because it is impracticable. There is
insufficient time remaining to complete an NPRM and any delay
encountered in this regulation's effective date by publishing a NPRM is
impracticable since immediate action is needed to ensure the safety of
the event participants, patrol vessels, spectator craft and other
vessels transiting the event area. The Coast Guard will provide advance
notifications to users of the effected waterways of the safety zone via
marine information broadcasts, local notice to mariners, commercial
radio stations and area newspapers.
    Under 5 U.S.C. 553(d)(3), for the same reasons as above, the Coast
Guard finds that good cause exists for making this rule effective less
than 30 days after publication in the Federal Register. Delaying the
effective date would be impracticable and contrary to the public
interest.

B. Background and Purpose

    On each Sunday from July 14, 2013, through August 25, 2013, Special
Event Productions, Inc., will host fireworks displays over Assawoman
Bay off the pier at Northside Park in Ocean City, MD. The fireworks
debris fallout area will extend over the navigable waters of Assawoman
Bay. Due to the need to protect mariners and spectators from the
hazards associated with the fireworks displays, such as the accidental
discharge of fireworks, dangerous projectiles, and falling hot embers
or other debris, vessel traffic will be temporarily restricted within
the fireworks launch and fallout area.
    The legal basis and authorities for this rule are found in 33
U.S.C. 1231, 46 U.S.C. Chapter 701, 3306, 3703; 50 U.S.C. 191, 195; 33
CFR 1.05-1, 6.04-1, 6.04-6, and 160.5; Pub. L. 107-295, 116 Stat. 2064;
and Department of Homeland Security Delegation No. 0170.1, which
collectively authorize the Coast Guard to establish and define
regulatory safety zones.

C. Discussion of the Rule

    The Coast Guard is establishing a safety zone on specified waters
of Assawoman Bay in Ocean City, MD. This safety zone will encompass all
navigable waters within a 420 foot radius of the fireworks launching
platform located at position 38[deg]25'55'' N, 075[deg]03'50.92'' W.
    This safety zone will be established and enforced from 8:45 p.m.
until 9:45 p.m. on the following: Sundays July 14, 21, & 28, 2013, and
August 4, 11, 18, & 25, 2013. In the interest of public safety, general
navigation and access to the safety zone will be restricted during the
specified date and times. Except for individuals responsible for
launching the fireworks and vessels authorized by the Captain of the
Port or his Representative, no person or vessel may enter or remain in
the regulated area.

D. Regulatory Analyses

    We developed this rule after considering numerous statutes and
executive orders related to rulemaking. Below we summarize our analyses
based on these statutes or executive orders.

1. Regulatory Planning and Review

    This rule is not a significant regulatory action under section 3(f)
of Executive Order 12866, Regulatory Planning and Review, and does not
require an assessment of potential costs and benefits under section
6(a)(3) of that Order. The Office of Management and Budget has not
reviewed it under that Order. Although this regulation restricts access
to the safety zone, the effect of this rule will not be significant
because: (i) The safety zone will be in effect for a limited duration;
(ii) the zone is of limited size; (iii) mariners may transit the waters
in and around this safety

zone at the discretion of the Captain of the Port or designated
representative; and (iv), the Coast Guard will make notifications via
maritime advisories so mariners can adjust their plans accordingly.

2. Impact on Small Entities

    Under the Regulatory Flexibility Act (5 U.S.C. 601-612), we have
considered whether this rule would have a significant economic impact
on a substantial number of small entities. The term ``small entities''
comprises small businesses, not-for-profit organizations that are
independently owned and operated and are not dominant in their fields,
and governmental jurisdictions with populations of less than 50,000.
    The Coast Guard certifies under 5 U.S.C. 605(b) that this rule will
not have a significant economic impact on a substantial number of small
entities.
    The rule would affect the following entities, some of which might
be small entities: the owners or operators of vessels intending to
transit or anchor in that portion of Assawoman Bay from 8:45 p.m. until
9:45 p.m. on each Sunday beginning July 14, 2013, and ending August 25,
2013.
    This safety zone will not have a significant economic impact on a
substantial number of small entities for the following reasons: (i) The
safety zone will only be in place for a limited duration. (ii) Before
the enforcement period of July 14, 2013 through August 25, 2013,
maritime advisories will be issued allowing mariners to adjust their
plans accordingly.

3. Assistance for Small Entities

    Under section 213(a) of the Small Business Regulatory Enforcement
Fairness Act of 1996 (Pub. L. 104-121), we offer to assist small
entities in understanding the rule so that they can better evaluate its
effects on them and participate in the rulemaking process.
    Small businesses may send comments on the actions of Federal
employees who enforce, or otherwise determine compliance with, Federal
regulations to the Small Business and Agriculture Regulatory
Enforcement Ombudsman and the Regional Small Business Regulatory
Fairness Boards. The Ombudsman evaluates these actions annually and
rates each agency's responsiveness to small business. If you wish to
comment on actions by employees of the Coast Guard, call 1-888-REG-FAIR
(1-888-734-3247). The Coast Guard will not retaliate against small
entities that question or complain about this rule or any policy or
action of the Coast Guard.

 4. Collection of Information

    This rule calls for no new collection of information under the
Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 (44 U.S.C. 3501-3520).

 5. Federalism

    A rule has implications for federalism under Executive Order 13132,
Federalism, if it has a substantial direct effect on State or local
governments and would either preempt State law or impose a substantial
direct cost of compliance on them. We have analyzed this rule under
that Order and have determined that it does not have implications for
federalism.

6. Protest Activities

    The Coast Guard respects the First Amendment rights of protesters.
Protesters are asked to contact the person listed in the FOR FURTHER
INFORMATION CONTACT section to coordinate protest activities so that
your message can be received without jeopardizing the safety or
security of people, places or vessels.

 7. Unfunded Mandates Reform Act

    The Unfunded Mandates Reform Act of 1995 (2 U.S.C. 1531-1538)
requires Federal agencies to assess the effects of their discretionary
regulatory actions. In particular, the Act addresses actions that may
result in the expenditure by a State, local, or tribal government, in
the aggregate, or by the private sector of $100,000,000 (adjusted for
inflation) or more in any one year. Though this rule will not result in
such an expenditure, we do discuss the effects of this rule elsewhere
in this preamble.

8. Taking of Private Property

    This rule will not affect a taking of private property or otherwise
have taking implications under Executive Order 12630, Governmental
Actions and Interference with Constitutionally Protected Property
Rights.

9. Civil Justice Reform

    This rule meets applicable standards in sections 3(a) and 3(b)(2)
of Executive Order 12988, Civil Justice Reform, to minimize litigation,
eliminate ambiguity, and reduce burden.

 10. Protection of Children

    We have analyzed this rule under Executive Order 13045, Protection
of Children from Environmental Health Risks and Safety Risks. This rule
is not an economically significant rule and does not create an
environmental risk to health or risk to safety that may
disproportionately affect children.

11. Indian Tribal Governments

    This rule does not have tribal implications under Executive Order
13175, Consultation and Coordination with Indian Tribal Governments,
because it does not have a substantial direct effect on one or more
Indian tribes, on the relationship between the Federal Government and
Indian tribes, or on the distribution of power and responsibilities
between the Federal Government and Indian tribes.

12. Energy Effects

    We have analyzed this rule under Executive Order 13211, Actions
Concerning Regulations That Significantly Affect Energy Supply,
Distribution, or Use. We have determined that it is not a ``significant
energy action'' under that order because it is not a ``significant
regulatory action'' under Executive Order 12866 and is not likely to
have a significant adverse effect on the supply, distribution, or use
of energy. The Administrator of the Office of Information and
Regulatory Affairs has not designated it as a significant energy
action. Therefore, it does not require a Statement of Energy Effects
under Executive Order 13211.

 13. Technical Standards

    This rule does not use technical standards. Therefore, we did not
consider the use of voluntary consensus standards.

 14. Environment

    We have analyzed this rule under Department of Homeland Security
Management Directive 023-01 and Commandant Instruction M16475.lD, which
guide the Coast Guard in complying with the National Environmental
Policy Act of 1969 (NEPA) (42 U.S.C. 4321-4370f), and have concluded
this action is one of a category of actions which do not individually
or cumulatively have a significant effect on the human environment.
This rule is categorically excluded, under figure 2-1, paragraph
(34)(g), of the Instruction. This rule involves establishing a
temporary safety zone. An environmental analysis checklist and a
categorical exclusion determination will be available in the docket
where indicated under ADDRESSES.

List of Subjects in 33 CFR Part 165

    Harbors, Marine safety, Navigation (water), Reporting and
recordkeeping requirements, Security measures, Waterways.

    For the reasons discussed in the preamble, the Coast Guard amends
33 CFR part 165 as follows:

PART 165--REGULATED NAVIGATION AREAS AND LIMITED ACCESS AREAS

0
1. The authority citation for part 165 continues to read as follows:

    Authority: 33 U.S.C. 1231; 46 U.S.C. Chapter 701, 3306, 3703; 50
U.S.C. 191, 195; 33 CFR 1.05-1, 6.04-1, 6.04-6 and 160.5; Pub. L.
107-295, 116 Stat. 2064; Department of Homeland Security Delegation
No. 0170.1.

0
2. Add Sec.  165.T05-0439 to read as follows:

165.T05-0439  Safety Zone, Assawoman Bay, Ocean City, MD.

    (a) Location. The following area is a safety zone: specified waters
of the Captain of the Port Sector Hampton Roads zone, as defined in 33
CFR 3.25-10, all water of the Assawoman Bay in Ocean City, MD within a
420 foot radius of position 38[deg]25'55'' N 075[deg]03'50.92'' W.
    (b) Definition. For the purposes of this part, Captain of the Port
Representative means any U.S. Coast Guard commissioned, warrant or
petty officer who has been authorized by the Captain of the Port,
Hampton Roads, Virginia to act on his behalf.
    (c) Regulations. (1) In accordance with the general regulations in
Sec.  165.23 of this part, entry into this zone is prohibited unless
authorized by the Captain of the Port, Hampton Roads or his designated
representatives.
    (2) The operator of any vessel in the immediate vicinity of this
safety zone shall:
    (i) Stop the vessel immediately upon being directed to do so by any
commissioned, warrant or petty officer on shore or on board a vessel
that is displaying a U.S. Coast Guard Ensign.
    (ii) Proceed as directed by any commissioned, warrant or petty
officer on shore or on board a vessel that is displaying a U.S. Coast
Guard Ensign.
    (3) The Captain of the Port, Hampton Roads can be reached through
the Sector Duty Officer at Sector Hampton Roads in Portsmouth, Virginia
at telephone Number<PHONE_NUMBER>.
    (4) The Coast Guard Representatives enforcing the safety zone can
be contacted on VHF-FM marine band radio channel 13 (165.65 Mhz) and
channel 16 (156.8 Mhz).
    (d) Enforcement Period. This section will be enforced from 8:45
p.m. to 9:45 p.m. on the following dates: July 14, 21 & 28, 2013 and
ending August 4, 11, 18 & 25, 2013.

    Dated: June 5, 2013.
John K. Little,
Captain, U.S. Coast Guard, Captain of the Port Hampton Roads.
[FR Doc. 2013-15822 Filed 7-1-13; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 9110-04-P


[Federal Register: March 5, 2008 (Volume 73, Number 44)]
[Notices]
[Page 11939-11940]
[DOCID:fr05mr08-94]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY

Coast Guard

[USCG-2007-0045]

Collection of Information Under Review by Office of Management
and Budget: OMB Control Numbers: 1625-0005, 1625-0020, 1625-0029, 1625-
0031, and 1625-0085

AGENCY: Coast Guard, DHS.

ACTION: Thirty-day notice requesting comments.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: In compliance with the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995, this
request for comments announces that the U.S. Coast Guard is forwarding
five Information Collection Requests (ICRs), abstracted below, to the
Office of Information and Regulatory Affairs (OIRA) of the Office of
Management and Budget (OMB) requesting an extension of their approval
for the following collections of information: (1) 1625-0005,
Application and Permit to Handle Hazardous Materials; (2) 1625-0020,
Security Zones, Regulated Navigation Areas, and Safety Zones; (3) 1625-
0029, Self-propelled Liquefied Gas Vessels; (4) 1625-0031, Plan
Approval and Records for Electrical Engineering Regulations--Title 46
CFR Subchapter J; and (5) 1625-0085, Streamlined Inspection Program.
Our ICRs describe the information we seek to collect from the public.
Review and comments by OIRA ensure we only impose paperwork burdens
commensurate with our performance of duties.

DATES: Please submit comments on or before April 4, 2008.

ADDRESSES: To prevent duplicate submissions to the docket [USCG-2007-
0045] or to OIRA, please submit your comments and related material by
only one of the following means:
    (1) Electronic submission. (a) To Coast Guard docket at http://
www.regulation.gov. (b) To OIRA by e-mail to<EMAIL_ADDRESS>    (2) Mail or hand delivery. (a) To Docket Management Facility (DMF)
(M-30), U.S. Department of Transportation, West Building Ground Floor,
Room W12-140, 1200 New Jersey Avenue, SE., Washington, DC 20590-0001.
Hand deliver between the hours of 9 a.m. and 5 p.m., Monday through
Friday, except Federal holidays. The telephone number is<PHONE_NUMBER>.
(b) To OIRA, 725 17th Street, NW., Washington, DC 20503, to the
attention of the Desk Officer for the Coast Guard.
    (3) Fax. (a) To DMF,<PHONE_NUMBER>. (b) To OIRA at<PHONE_NUMBER>. To
ensure your comments are received in time, mark the fax to the
attention of Mr. Nathan Lesser, Desk Officer for the Coast Guard.
    The DMF maintains the public docket for this notice. Comments and
material received from the public, as well as documents mentioned in
this notice as being available in the docket, will become part of this
docket and will be available for inspection or copying at room W12-140
on the West Building Ground Floor, 1200 New Jersey Avenue, SE.,
Washington, DC, between 9 a.m. and 5 p.m., Monday through Friday,
except Federal holidays. You may also find this docket on the Internet
at http://www.regulations.gov.
    Copies of the complete ICRs are available through this docket on
the Internet at http://www.regulations.gov. Additionally, copies are
available from Commandant (CG-611), U.S. Coast Guard Headquarters,
(Attn: Mr. Arthur Requina), 2100 2nd Street, SW., Washington, DC 20593-
0001. The telephone number is<PHONE_NUMBER>.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Mr. Arthur Requina, Office of
Information Management, telephone<PHONE_NUMBER> or fax<PHONE_NUMBER>, for
questions on these documents. Contact Ms. Renee V. Wright, Program
Manager, Docket Operations,<PHONE_NUMBER>, for questions on the docket.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The Coast Guard invites comments on whether
this information collection request should be granted based on it being
necessary for the proper performance of Departmental functions. In
particular, the Coast Guard would appreciate comments addressing: (1)
The practical utility of the collections; (2) the accuracy of the
estimated burden of the collections; (3) ways to enhance the quality,
utility, and clarity of information subject to the collections; and (4)
ways to minimize the burden of collections on respondents, including
the use of automated collection techniques or other forms of
information technology.
    Comments to Coast Guard or OIRA must contain the OMB Control Number
of the ICRs addressed. Comments to Coast Guard must contain the docket
number of this request, [USCG 2007-0045]. For your comments to OIRA to
be considered, they must be received on or before April 4, 2008.
    Public participation and request for comments: We encourage you to
respond to this request by submitting comments and related materials.
We will post all comments received, without change, to http://
www.regulations.gov. They will include any personal information you
provide. We have an agreement with DOT to use their DMF. Please see the
paragraph on DOT's ``Privacy Act Policy'' below.
    Submitting comments: If you submit a comment, please include the
docket number [USCG-2007-0045], indicate the specific section of the
document to which each comment applies, providing a reason for each
comment. We recommend you include your name, mailing address, an e-mail
address, or other contact information in the body of your document so
that we can contact you if we have questions regarding your submission.
You may submit comments and material by electronic means, mail, fax, or
delivery to the DMF at the address under ADDRESSES; but please submit
them by only one means. If you submit them by mail or delivery, submit
them in an unbound format, no larger than 8\1/2\ by 11 inches, suitable
for copying and electronic filing. If you

submit them by mail and would like to know that they reached the
Facility, please enclose a stamped, self-addressed postcard or
envelope. We will consider all comments and material received during
the comment period. We may change the documents supporting this
collection of information or even the underlying requirements in view
of them. The Coast Guard and OIRA will consider all comments and
material received during the comment period.
    Viewing comments and documents: Go to http://www.regulations.gov to
view documents mentioned in this notice as being available in the
docket. Click on ``Search for Dockets,'' and enter the docket number
(USCG-2007-0045) in the Docket ID box, and click enter. You may also
visit the DMF in room W12-140 on the West Building Ground Floor, 1200
New Jersey Avenue, SE., Washington, DC, between 9 a.m. and 5 p.m.,
Monday through Friday, except Federal holidays.
    Privacy Act: Anyone can search the electronic form of all comments
received in dockets by the name of the individual submitting the
comment (or signing the comment, if submitted on behalf of an
association, business, labor union, etc.). You may review the Privacy
Act Statement of DOT in the Federal Register published on April 11,
2000 (65 FR 19477), or by visiting http://DocketsInfo.dot.gov.

Previous Request for Comments

    This request provides a 30-day comment period required by OIRA. The
Coast Guard has published the 60-day notice (72 FR 64233, November 15,
2007) required by 44 U.S.C. 3506(c)(2). That notice elicited no
comments.

Information Collection Request

    1. Title: Application and Permit to Handle Hazardous Materials.
    OMB Control Number: 1625-0005.
    Type of Request: Extension of a currently approved collection.
    Affected Public: Shipping agents and terminal operators that handle
hazardous materials.
    Abstract: Sections 1225 and 1231 of 33 U.S.C. authorize the Coast
Guard to establish standards for the handling, storage, and movement of
hazardous materials on a vessel and waterfront facility. Regulations in
33 CFR 126.17, 49 CFR 176.100, and 176.415 prescribe the rules for
facilities and vessels.
    Burden Estimate: The estimated burden has increased from 145 hours
to 185 hours a year.
    2. Title: Security Zones, Regulated Navigation Areas, and Safety
Zones.
    OMB Control Number: 1625-0020.
    Type of Request: Extension of a currently approved collection.
    Affected Public: Federal, State, and local government agencies,
vessels, and facilities.
    Abstract: Sections 1226 and 1231 of 33 U.S.C.; 50 U.S.C. 191 and
195; and parts 6 and 165 of 33 CFR give the Coast Guard Captain of the
Port (COTP) the authority to designate security zones in the U.S. for
as long as deemed necessary to prevent damage or injury. Section 1223
of 33 U.S.C. authorizes the Coast Guard to prescribe rules to control
vessel traffic in areas deemed hazardous because of reduced visibility,
adverse weather, or vessel congestion. Section 1225 of 33 U.S.C.
authorizes the Coast Guard to establish rules to allow the designation
of safety zones where access is limited to authorized persons,
vehicles, or vessels to protect the public from hazardous situations.
    Burden Estimate: The estimated burden has increased from 194 hours
to 295 hours a year.
    3. Title: Self-propelled Liquefied Gas Vessels.
    OMB Control Number: 1625-0029.
    Type Of Request: Extension of a currently approved collection.
    Affected Public: Owners and operators of self-propelled vessels
carrying liquefied gas.
    Abstract: Sections 3703 and 9101 of 46 U.S.C. authorize the Coast
Guard to establish regulations to protect life, property, and the
environment from the hazards associated with the carriage of dangerous
liquid cargo in bulk. Part 154 of 46 CFR prescribes these rules for the
carriage of liquefied gases in bulk on self-propelled vessels by
governing the design, construction, equipment, and operation of these
vessels and the safety of personnel aboard them.
    Burden Estimate: The estimated burden has increased from 5,416
hours to 6,566 hours a year.
    4. Title: Plan Approval and Records for Electrical Engineering
Regulations--Title 46 CFR Subchapter J.
    OMB Control Number: 1625-0031.
    Type Of Request: Extension of a currently approved collection.
    Affected Public: Owners, operators, and builders of vessels.
    Abstract: Sections 3306 and 3703 of 46 U.S.C. authorize the Coast
Guard to establish rules to promote the safety of life and property in
commercial vessels. The electrical engineering rules appear at 46 CFR
chapter I, subchapter J (parts 110 through 113).
    Burden Estimate: The estimated burden has increased from 1,151
hours to 3,529 hours a year.
    5. Title: Streamlined Inspection Program (SIP).
    OMB Control Number: 1625-0085.
    Type Of Request: Extension of a currently approved collection.
    Affected Public: Owners and operators of vessels.
    Abstract: Section 3306 of 46 U.S.C. authorizes the Coast Guard to
prescribe regulations necessary to carry out inspections of vessels
required under 46 U.S.C. 3301. Within the same subtitle, section 3103
allows the Coast Guard to rely on reports, documents, and records of
other persons/methods determined to be reliable, to ensure compliance
with vessels and seamen requirements. The SIP regulations under 46 CFR
part 8, subpart E, offer owners and operators of inspected vessels an
alternative to traditional Coast Guard inspection procedures. Owners
and operators of vessels opting to participate in the program will
maintain them in compliance with a Company Action Plan (CAP) and Vessel
Action Plan (VAP). They will have their own personnel periodically
perform many of the tests/examinations conducted by marine inspectors
of the Coast Guard, who expect participating vessels will continuously
meet a higher level of safety/readiness throughout the inspection
cycle.
    Burden Estimate: The estimated burden has increased from 2,138
hours to 2,496 hours a year.

    Dated: February 14, 2008.
D.T. Glenn
Rear Admiral, U.S. Coast Guard, Assistant Commandant for Command,
Control, Communications, Computers and Information Technology.
[FR Doc. E8-4194 Filed 3-4-08; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4910-15-P


[Federal Register Volume 83, Number 224 (Tuesday, November 20, 2018)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Pages 58471-58472]
[FR Doc No: 2018-25182]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION

Federal Aviation Administration

14 CFR Part 71

[Docket No. FAA-2018-0683; Airspace Docket No. 18-AGL-17]
RIN 2120-AA66

Amendment of Class E Airspace; Lapeer, MI

AGENCY: Federal Aviation Administration (FAA), DOT.

ACTION: Final rule.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: This action modifies Class E airspace extending upward from
700 feet above the surface at Dupont-Lapeer Airport, Lapeer, MI. This
action is the result of an airspace review caused by the
decommissioning of the Pontiac VHF omnidirectional range (VOR)
navigation aid, which provided navigation information for the
instrument procedures at this airport, as part of the VOR Minimum
Operational Network (MON) Program. This action is necessary for the
safety and management of instrument flight rules (IFR) operations at
this airport.

DATES: Effective 0901 UTC, February 28, 2019. The Director of the
Federal Register approves this incorporation by reference action under
Title 1 Code of Federal Regulations part 51, subject to the annual
revision of FAA Order 7400.11 and publication of conforming amendments.

ADDRESSES: FAA Order 7400.11C, Airspace Designations and Reporting
Points, and subsequent amendments can be viewed online at http://www.faa.gov/air_traffic/publications/. For further information, you can
contact the Airspace Policy Group, Federal Aviation Administration, 800
Independence Avenue SW, Washington, DC 20591; telephone: (202) 267-
8783. The Order is also available for inspection at the National
Archives and Records Administration (NARA). For information on the
availability of FAA Order 7400.11C at NARA, call<PHONE_NUMBER>, or go
to https://www.archives.gov/federal-register/cfr/ibr-locations.html.
    FAA Order 7400.11, Airspace Designations and Reporting Points, is
published yearly and effective on September 15.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Jeffrey Claypool, Federal Aviation
Administration, Operations Support Group, Central Service Center, 10101
Hillwood Parkway, Fort Worth, TX 76177; telephone<PHONE_NUMBER>.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

Authority for This Rulemaking

    The FAA's authority to issue rules regarding aviation safety is
found in Title 49 of the United States Code. Subtitle I, Section 106
describes the authority of the FAA Administrator. Subtitle VII,
Aviation Programs, describes in more detail the scope of the agency's
authority. This rulemaking is promulgated under the authority described
in Subtitle VII, Part A, Subpart I, Section 40103. Under that section,
the FAA is charged with prescribing regulations to assign the use of
airspace necessary to ensure the safety of aircraft and the efficient
use of airspace. This regulation is within the scope of that authority
as it amends Class E airspace extending upward from 700 feet above the
surface at Dupont-Lapeer Airport, Lapeer, MI, to support IFR operations
at this airport.

History

    The FAA published a notice of proposed rulemaking in the Federal
Register (83 FR 44249; August 30, 2018) for Docket No. FAA-2018-0683 to
amend Class E airspace extending upward from 700 feet above the surface
at Dupont-Lapeer Airport, Lapeer, MI. Interested parties were invited
to participate in this rulemaking effort by submitting written comments
on the proposal to the FAA. No comments were received.
    Class E airspace designations are published in paragraph 6005 of
FAA Order 7400.11C, dated August 13, 2018, and effective September 15,
2018, which is incorporated by reference in 14 CFR 71.1. The Class E
airspace designations listed in this document will be published
subsequently in the Order.

Availability and Summary of Documents for Incorporation by Reference

    This document amends FAA Order 7400.11C, Airspace Designations and
Reporting Points, dated August 13, 2018, and effective September 15,
2018. FAA Order 7400.11C is publicly available as listed in the
ADDRESSES section of this document. FAA Order 7400.11C lists Class A,
B, C, D, and E airspace areas, air traffic service routes, and
reporting points.

The Rule

    This amendment to Title 14 Code of Federal Regulations (14 CFR)
part 71 amends the Class E airspace extending upward from 700 feet
above the surface to within a 6.4-mile radius (decreased from a 6.5-
mile radius) at Dupont-Lapeer Airport, Lapeer, MI; and amends the
extension to the north to extend from the 6.4-mile radius (decreased
from the 6.5-mile radius) to 11 miles (increased from 10.9 miles) north
of the airport.
    This action is the result of an airspace review caused by the
decommissioning of the Pontiac VOR, which provided navigation
information to the instrument procedures at this airport, as part of
the VOR MON Program.

Regulatory Notices and Analyses

    The FAA has determined that this regulation only involves an
established body of technical regulations for which frequent and
routine amendments are necessary to keep them operationally current, is
non-controversial and unlikely to result in adverse or negative
comments. It, therefore: (1) Is not a ``significant regulatory action''
under Executive Order 12866; (2) is not a ``significant rule'' under
DOT Regulatory Policies and Procedures (44 FR 11034; February 26,
1979); and (3) does not warrant preparation of a regulatory evaluation
as the anticipated impact is so minimal. Since this is a routine matter
that only affects air traffic procedures and air navigation, it is
certified that this rule, when promulgated, does not have a significant
economic impact on a substantial number of small entities under the
criteria of the Regulatory Flexibility Act.

Environmental Review

    The FAA has determined that this action qualifies for categorical
exclusion under the National Environmental Policy Act in accordance
with FAA Order 1050.1F, ``Environmental Impacts: Policies and
Procedures,'' paragraph 5-6.5.a. This airspace action is not expected
to cause any potentially significant environmental impacts, and no
extraordinary circumstances exist that warrant preparation of an
environmental assessment.

Lists of Subjects in 14 CFR Part 71

    Airspace, Incorporation by reference, Navigation (air).

Adoption of the Amendment

    In consideration of the foregoing, the Federal Aviation
Administration amends 14 CFR part 71 as follows:

PART 71--DESIGNATION OF CLASS A, B, C, D, AND E AIRSPACE AREAS; AIR
TRAFFIC SERVICE ROUTES; AND REPORTING POINTS

0
1. The authority citation for part 71 continues to read as follows:

    Authority: 49 U.S.C. 106(f), 106(g); 40103, 40113, 40120; E.O.
10854, 24 FR 9565, 3 CFR, 1959-1963 Comp., p. 389.

Sec.  71.1  [Amended]

0
2. The incorporation by reference in 14 CFR 71.1 of FAA Order 7400.11C,
Airspace Designations and Reporting Points, dated August 13, 2018, and
effective September 15, 2018, is amended as follows:

Paragraph 6005 Class E Airspace Areas Extending Upward From 700
Feet or More Above the Surface of the Earth.

* * * * *

AGL MI E5 Lapeer, MI [Amended]

Dupont-Lapeer Airport, MI
    (Lat. 43[deg]03'59'' N, long. 83[deg]16'18'' W)

    That airspace extending upward from 700 feet above the surface
within a 6.4-mile radius of Dupont-Lapeer Airport, and within 2
miles each side of the 357[deg] bearing from the airport extending
from the 6.4-mile radius to 11 miles north of the airport.

    Issued in Fort Worth, Texas, on November 8, 2018.
Walter Tweedy,
Acting Manager, Operations Support Group, ATO Central Service Center.
[FR Doc. 2018-25182 Filed 11-19-18; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910-13-P


[Federal Register Volume 79, Number 217 (Monday, November 10, 2014)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Pages 66654-66655]
[FR Doc No: 2014-26521]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY

40 CFR Part 52

[EPA-R04-OAR-2014-0765; FRL-9918-94-Region 4]

Approval and Promulgation of Implementation Plans; North
Carolina; Approval of Revisions to Inspection and Maintenance (I/M)
Regulations Within the North Carolina State Implementation Plan;
Correcting Amendment

AGENCY: Environmental Protection Agency.

ACTION: Direct final rule; correcting amendment.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: On October 30, 2002, the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA)
published a direct final rule in the Federal Register approving North
Carolina State Implementation Plan (SIP) revisions, submitted through
the North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resources (NC
DENR), Division of Air Quality (DAQ), regarding the State's enhanced
inspection and maintenance (I/M) program. This correcting amendment
corrects inadvertent errors for two rule titles in the regulatory text
of EPA's October 30, 2002, direct final rule.

DATES: This action is effective November 10, 2014.

ADDRESSES: Copies of the documentation used in the action being
corrected are available for inspection during normal business hours at
the following location: U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Region 4,
61 Forsyth Street SW., Atlanta, Georgia 30303-8960. The Regional
Office's official hours of business are Monday through Friday, 8:30 to
4:30, excluding Federal holidays.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Nacosta C. Ward, Regulatory
Development Section, Air Planning Branch, Air, Pesticides and Toxics
Management Division, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Region 4, 61
Forsyth Street SW., Atlanta, Georgia 30303-8960. The telephone number
is<PHONE_NUMBER>. Ms. Ward can also be reached via electronic mail at
<EMAIL_ADDRESS>
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: This action corrects the titles for two
North Carolina regulations that appear in North Carolina's
Identification of Plan at section 40 CFR 52.1770(c) under Table 1, at
Subchapter 2D Air Pollution Control Requirements, Section .1000 Motor
Vehicle Emissions Control Standard. The two titles that appear in Table
1 as approved in EPA's direct final rulemaking on October 30, 2002 (67
FR 66056), are Sect .1004 ``Emissions Standards'' and Sect .1005
``Measurement and Enforcement.'' However, the rule titles should read
Sect .1004 ``Tailpipe Emission Standards for CO and HC'' and Sect .1005
``On-Board Diagnostic Standards'' as provided in the red-line/
strikethrough portion of NC DENR's August 7, 2002, SIP revision. EPA is
correcting these inadvertent errors by replacing the current titles for
Sect .1004 and Sect .1005 with the correct titles into North Carolina's
Identification of Plan section of the Code of Federal Regulations (CFR)
at 40 CFR 52.1770(c).
    EPA has determined that this action falls under the ``good cause''
exemption in section 553(b)(3)(B) of the Administrative Procedure Act
(APA) which, upon finding ``good cause,'' authorizes agencies to
dispense with public participation where public notice and comment
procedures are impracticable, unnecessary or contrary to the public
interest. Public notice and comment for this action are unnecessary
because this action to insert the correct titles in the CFR for Sect
.1004 and Sect .1005 for North Carolina's regulations has no
substantive impact on EPA's October 30, 2002, approval. The use of
incorrect titles as printed for the two regulations in the regulatory
text section of EPA's direct final rule published on October 30, 2002,
makes no substantive difference to EPA's analysis as set out in the
rule. In addition, EPA can identify no particular reason why the public
would be interested in having the opportunity to comment on the
corrections prior to this action being finalized, since this correcting
amendment does not change the meaning of the regulations at issue or
otherwise change EPA's analysis of North Carolina's enhanced I/M SIP
revision. See 67 FR 66056.
    EPA also finds that there is good cause under APA section 553(d)(3)
for these corrections to become effective on the date of publication of
this action. Section 553(d)(3) of the APA allows an effective date less
than 30 days after publication ``as otherwise provided by the agency
for good cause found and published with the rule.'' 5 U.S.C. 553(d)(3).
The purpose of the 30-day waiting period prescribed in APA section
553(d)(3) is to give affected parties a reasonable time to adjust their
behavior and prepare before the final rule takes effect. This rule,
however, does not create any new regulatory requirements such that
affected parties would need time to prepare before the rule takes
effect. Rather, this rule merely corrects inadvertent errors for the
two aforementioned rule titles contained in the North Carolina
regulations which EPA approved on October 30, 2002. For these reasons,
EPA finds good cause under APA section 553(d)(3) for this correction to
become effective on the date of publication of this action.

Statutory and Executive Order Reviews

    Under Executive Order 12866 (58 FR 51735, October 4, 1993), this
action is not a ``significant regulatory action'' and therefore is not
subject to review by the Office of Management and Budget. For this
reason, this action is also not subject to Executive Order 13211,
``Actions Concerning Regulations That Significantly Affect Energy
Supply, Distribution, or Use'' (66 FR 28355, May 22, 2001). This action
merely corrects inadvertent errors for the two aforementioned rule
titles contained in the North Carolina regulations which EPA approved
on October 30, 2002, and it imposes no additional requirements beyond
those imposed by state law. Accordingly, the Administrator certifies
that this rule will not have a significant economic impact on a
substantial number of small entities under the Regulatory Flexibility
Act (5 U.S.C. 601 et seq.). Because this rule merely corrects
inadvertent errors for the two aforementioned rule titles contained in
the North Carolina regulations which EPA approved on October 30, 2002,
and does not impose any additional enforceable duty beyond that
required by state law, it does not contain any unfunded mandate or
significantly or uniquely affect small governments, as described in the
Unfunded Mandates Reform Act of 1995 (Pub. L. 104-4).
    The SIP is not approved to apply on any Indian reservation land or
in any other area where EPA or an Indian tribe has demonstrated that a
tribe has jurisdiction. In those areas of Indian country, the rule does
not have tribal implications as specified by Executive Order 13175 (65
FR 67249, November 9, 2000), nor will it impose substantial direct
costs on tribal governments or preempt tribal law.
    This rule also does not have Federalism implications because it
does not have substantial direct effects on the states, on the
relationship between the national government and the states, or on the
distribution of power and responsibilities among the various levels of
government, as specified in

Executive Order 13132 (64 FR 43255, August 10, 1999). This rule merely
corrects inadvertent errors for the two aforementioned rule titles
contained in the North Carolina regulations which EPA approved on
October 30, 2002, and does not alter the relationship or the
distribution of power and responsibilities established in the Clean Air
Act (CAA). This rule also is not subject to Executive Order 13045
``Protection of Children from Environmental Health Risks and Safety
Risks'' (62 FR 19885, April 23, 1997), because it is not economically
significant. In addition, this rule does not involve technical
standards, thus the requirements of section 12(d) of the National
Technology Transfer and Advancement Act of 1995 (15 U.S.C. 272 note) do
not apply. This rule also does not impose an information collection
burden under the provisions of the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 (44
U.S.C. 3501 et seq.).
    The Congressional Review Act, 5 U.S.C. section 801 et seq., as
added by the Small Business Regulatory Enforcement Fairness Act of
1996, generally provides that before a rule may take effect, the agency
promulgating the rule must submit a rule report, which includes a copy
of the rule, to each House of the Congress and to the Comptroller
General of the United States. EPA will submit a report containing this
rule and other required information to the U.S. Senate, the U.S. House
of Representatives, and the Comptroller General of the United States
prior to publication of the rule in the Federal Register. A major rule
cannot take effect until 60 days after it is published in the Federal
Register. This action is not a ``major rule'' as defined by 5 U.S.C.
804(2).

 List of Subjects in 40 CFR Part 52

    Environmental protection, Air pollution control, Carbon monoxide,
Incorporation by reference, Intergovernmental relations, Nitrogen
dioxide, Ozone, Reporting and recordkeeping requirements, Volatile
organic compounds.

    Dated: October 23, 2014.
V. Anne Heard,
Acting Regional Administrator, Region 4.

    40 CFR part 52 is amended as follows:

PART 52--APPROVAL AND PROMULGATION OF IMPLEMENTATION PLANS

0
1. The authority citation for part 52 continues to read as follows:

    Authority: 42 U.S.C. 7401 et seq.

Subpart II--North Carolina

0
2. Section 52.1770(c) is amended in Table 1, under ``Subchapter 2D Air
Pollution Control Requirements'', ``Section .1000 Motor Vehicle
Emissions Control Standard'' by revising the entries for ``Sect .1004''
and ``Sect .1005'' to read as follows:

Sec.  52.1770  Identification of plan.

* * * * *
    (c) * * *

                                Table 1--EPA-Approved North Carolina Regulations
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
                                                            State
         State citation              Title/Subject     effective date   EPA Approval date        Explanation
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
                                Subchapter 2D Air Pollution Control Requirements
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

                                                  * * * * * * *
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
                             Section .1000 Motor Vehicle Emissions Control Standard
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

                                                  * * * * * * *
Sect .1004......................  Tailpipe Emission          7/1/2002  11/10/2014 [Insert   ....................
                                   Standards for CO                     Federal Register
                                   and HC.                              citation].
Sect .1005......................  On-Board Diagnostic        7/1/2002  11/10/2014 [Insert   ....................
                                   Standards.                           Federal Register
                                                                        citation].

                                                  * * * * * * *
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

* * * * *
[FR Doc. 2014-26521 Filed 11-7-14; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6560-50-P


[Federal Register Volume 85, Number 223 (Wednesday, November 18, 2020)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Pages 73404-73407]
[FR Doc No: 2020-25387]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION

Federal Aviation Administration

14 CFR Part 39

[Docket No. FAA-2020-0582; Product Identifier 2020-NM-059-AD; Amendment
39-21326; AD 2020-23-10]
RIN 2120-AA64

Airworthiness Directives; Dassault Aviation Airplanes

AGENCY: Federal Aviation Administration (FAA), Department of
Transportation (DOT).

ACTION: Final rule.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The FAA is superseding Airworthiness Directive (AD) 2014-26-07
and AD 2019-07-01 which apply to Dassault Aviation Model FAN JET FALCON
and FAN JET FALCON SERIES C, D, E, F, and G airplanes. AD 2019-07-01
required revising the existing maintenance or inspection program, as
applicable, to incorporate new or more restrictive airworthiness
limitations. This AD requires revising the existing maintenance or
inspection program, as applicable, to incorporate new or more
restrictive airworthiness limitations, as specified in a European Union
Aviation Safety Agency (EASA) AD, which is incorporated by reference.
This AD was prompted by a determination that new or more restrictive
airworthiness limitations are necessary. The FAA is issuing this AD to
address the unsafe condition on these products.

DATES: This AD is effective December 23, 2020.
    The Director of the Federal Register approved the incorporation by
reference of a certain publication listed in this AD as of December 23,
2020.
    The Director of the Federal Register approved the incorporation by
reference of a certain other publication listed in this AD as of May
24, 2019 (84 FR 16390, April 19, 2019).

ADDRESSES: For EASA material incorporated by reference (IBR) in this
AD, contact the EASA, Konrad-Adenauer-Ufer 3, 50668 Cologne, Germany;
telephone +49 221 8999 000; email<EMAIL_ADDRESS>internet
www.easa.europa.eu. You may find this IBR material on the EASA website
at https://ad.easa.europa.eu. For the Dassault Aviation material
identified in this AD that continues to be IBR, contact Dassault Falcon
Jet Corporation, Teterboro Airport, P.O. Box 2000, South Hackensack, NJ
07606; telephone<PHONE_NUMBER>; internet https://www.dassaultfalcon.com.
You may view this IBR material at the FAA, Airworthiness Products
Section, Operational Safety Branch, 2200 South 216th St., Des Moines,
WA. For information on the availability of this material at the FAA,
call<PHONE_NUMBER>. It is also available in the AD docket on the
internet at https://www.regulations.gov by searching for and locating
Docket No. FAA-2020-0582.

Examining the AD Docket

    You may examine the AD docket on the internet at https://www.regulations.gov by searching for and locating Docket No. FAA-2020-
0582; or in person at Docket Operations between 9 a.m. and 5 p.m.,
Monday through Friday, except Federal holidays. The AD docket contains
this final rule, any comments received, and other information. The
address for Docket Operations is U.S. Department of Transportation,
Docket Operations, M-30, West Building Ground Floor, Room W12-140, 1200
New Jersey Avenue SE, Washington, DC 20590.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Tom Rodriguez, Aerospace Engineer,
Large Aircraft Section, International Validation Branch, FAA, 2200
South 216th St., Des Moines, WA 98198; telephone and fax<PHONE_NUMBER>;
email<EMAIL_ADDRESS>
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

Discussion

    The EASA, which is the Technical Agent for the Member States of the
European Union, has issued EASA AD 2019-0141, dated June 17, 2019
(``EASA AD 2019-0141'') (also referred to as the Mandatory Continuing
Airworthiness Information, or ``the MCAI''), to correct an unsafe
condition for certain Dassault Aviation Model FAN JET FALCON and FAN
JET FALCON SERIES C, D, E, F, and G airplanes.
    The FAA issued a notice of proposed rulemaking (NPRM) to amend 14
CFR part 39 to supersede AD 2019-07-01, Amendment 39-19612 (84 FR
16390, April 19, 2019) (``AD 2019-07-01'') and AD 2014-26-07, Amendment
39-18058 (80 FR 2815, January 21, 2015) (``AD 2014-26-07''). AD 2019-
07-01 applied to certain Dassault Aviation Model FAN JET FALCON and FAN
JET FALCON SERIES C, D, E, F, and G airplanes. The NPRM published in
the Federal Register on July 15, 2020 (85 FR 42746). The NPRM was
prompted by a determination that new or more restrictive airworthiness
limitations are necessary. The NPRM proposed to require revising the
existing maintenance or inspection program, as applicable, to
incorporate new or more restrictive airworthiness limitations, as
specified in an EASA AD.
    The FAA is issuing this AD to address, among other things, fatigue
cracking and damage in principal structural elements; such fatigue
cracking and damage could result in reduced structural integrity of the
airplane. See the MCAI for additional background information.

Comments

    The FAA gave the public the opportunity to participate in
developing this final rule. The FAA received no comments on the NPRM or
on the determination of the cost to the public.

Conclusion

    The FAA reviewed the relevant data and determined that air safety
and the public interest require adopting this final rule as proposed,
except for minor editorial changes. The FAA has determined that these
minor changes:
     Are consistent with the intent that was proposed in the
NPRM for addressing the unsafe condition; and
     Do not add any additional burden upon the public than was
already proposed in the NPRM.

Related IBR Material Under 1 CFR Part 51

    EASA AD 2019-0141 describes new or more restrictive airworthiness
limitations for airplane structures and safe life limits.
    This AD also requires Chapter 5-40, Airworthiness Limitations, DGT
131028, Revision 17, dated September 2017, of the Dassault Aviation
Falcon 20 Maintenance Manual, which the Director of the Federal
Register approved for incorporation by reference as of May 24, 2019 (84
FR 16390, April 19, 2019).
    This material is reasonably available because the interested
parties have access to it through their normal course of business or by
the means identified in the ADDRESSES section.

Costs of Compliance

    The FAA estimates that this AD affects 168 airplanes of U.S.
registry. The FAA estimates the following costs to comply with this AD:
    The FAA estimates the total cost per operator for the retained
actions from AD 2019-07-01 to be $7,650 (90 work-hours x $85 per work-
hour).
    The FAA has determined that revising the existing maintenance or
inspection program takes an average of 90 work-hours per operator,
although the agency recognizes that this number may vary from operator
to operator. In the past, the agency has estimated that this action
takes 1 work-hour per airplane. Since operators incorporate maintenance
or inspection program changes for their affected fleet(s), the FAA has
determined that a per-operator estimate is more accurate than a per-
airplane estimate. The FAA estimates the total cost per operator for
the new proposed actions to be $7,650 (90 work-hours x $85 per work-
hour).

Authority for This Rulemaking

    Title 49 of the United States Code specifies the FAA's authority to
issue rules on aviation safety. Subtitle I, section 106, describes the
authority of the FAA Administrator. Subtitle VII: Aviation Programs,
describes in more detail the scope of the Agency's authority.
    The FAA is issuing this rulemaking under the authority described in
Subtitle VII, Part A, Subpart III, Section 44701: General requirements.
Under that section, Congress charges the FAA with promoting safe flight
of civil aircraft in air commerce by prescribing regulations for
practices, methods, and procedures the Administrator finds necessary
for safety in air commerce. This regulation is within the scope of that
authority because it addresses an unsafe condition that is likely to
exist or develop on products identified in this rulemaking action.

Regulatory Findings

    This AD will not have federalism implications under Executive Order
13132. This AD will not have a substantial direct effect on the States,
on the relationship between the national government and the States, or
on the distribution of power and responsibilities among the various
levels of government.
    For the reasons discussed above, I certify that this AD:
    (1) Is not a ``significant regulatory action'' under Executive
Order 12866,
    (2) Will not affect intrastate aviation in Alaska, and
    (3) Will not have a significant economic impact, positive or
negative, on a substantial number of small entities under the criteria
of the Regulatory Flexibility Act.

List of Subjects in 14 CFR Part 39

    Air transportation, Aircraft, Aviation safety, Incorporation by
reference, Safety.

Adoption of the Amendment

    Accordingly, under the authority delegated to me by the
Administrator, the FAA amends 14 CFR part 39 as follows:

PART 39--AIRWORTHINESS DIRECTIVES

0
1. The authority citation for part 39 continues to read as follows:

    Authority: 49 U.S.C. 106(g), 40113, 44701.

Sec.  39.13   [Amended]

0
2. The FAA amends Sec.  39.13 by:
0
a. Removing Airworthiness Directive (AD) 2014-26-07, Amendment 39-18058
(80 FR 2815, January 21, 2015); and AD 2019-07-01, Amendment 39-19612
(84 FR 16390, April 19, 2019); and
0
b. Adding the following new AD:

2020-23-10 Dassault Aviation: Amendment 39-21326; Docket No. FAA-
2020-0582; Product Identifier 2020-NM-059-AD.

(a) Effective Date

    This airworthiness directive (AD) is effective December 23,
2020.

(b) Affected ADs

    This AD replaces AD 2014-26-07, Amendment 39-18058 (80 FR 2815,
January 21, 2015) (``AD 2014-26-07''); and AD 2019-

07-01, Amendment 39-19612 (84 FR 16390, April 19, 2019) (``AD 2019-
07-01'').

(c) Applicability

    This AD applies to the Dassault Aviation airplanes specified in
paragraphs (c)(1) and (2) of this AD, certificated in any category,
as identified in European Union Aviation Safety Agency (EASA) AD
2019-0141, dated June 17, 2019 (``EASA AD 2019-0141'').
    (1) Model FAN JET FALCON airplanes.
    (2) Model FAN JET FALCON SERIES C, D, E, F, and G airplanes.

(d) Subject

    Air Transport Association (ATA) of America Code 05, Time Limits/
Maintenance Checks.

(e) Reason

    This AD was prompted by a determination that new or more
restrictive airworthiness limitations are necessary. The FAA is
issuing this AD to address, among other things, fatigue cracking and
damage in principal structural elements; such fatigue cracking and
damage could result in reduced structural integrity of the airplane.

(f) Compliance

    Comply with this AD within the compliance times specified,
unless already done.

(g) Retained Maintenance or Inspection Program Revision, With No
Changes

    This paragraph restates the requirements of paragraph (g) of AD
2019-07-01, with no changes. Within 12 months after May 24, 2019
(the effective date of AD 2019-07-01), revise the existing
maintenance or inspection program, as applicable, to incorporate the
airworthiness limitations and maintenance requirements specified in
Chapter 5-40, Airworthiness Limitations, DGT 131028, Revision 17,
dated September 2017, of the Dassault Aviation Falcon 20 Maintenance
Manual. The initial compliance time for accomplishing the actions is
at the applicable time specified in Chapter 5-40, Airworthiness
Limitations, DGT 131028, Revision 17, dated September 2017, of the
Dassault Aviation Falcon 20 Maintenance Manual or within 12 months
after May 24, 2019, whichever occurs later. Where the threshold
column in the table in paragraph B, Mandatory Maintenance
Operations, of Chapter 5-40, Airworthiness Limitations, DGT 131028,
Revision 17, dated September 2017, of the Dassault Aviation Falcon
20 Maintenance Manual specifies a compliance time in years, those
compliance times are since the date of issuance of the original
French or EASA airworthiness certificate or date of issuance of the
original French or EASA export certificate of airworthiness.
Accomplishing the maintenance or inspection program revision
required by paragraph (i) of this AD terminates the requirements of
this paragraph.

(h) Retained Restrictions on Alternative Actions and Intervals With a
New Exception

    This paragraph restates the requirements of paragraph (h) of AD
2019-07-01, with a new exception. Except as required by paragraph
(i) of this AD, after accomplishing the revision required by
paragraph (g) of this AD, no alternative actions (e.g., inspections)
or intervals may be used unless the actions or intervals are
approved as an alternative method of compliance (AMOC) in accordance
with the procedures specified in paragraph (l)(1) of this AD.

(i) New Maintenance or Inspection Program Revision

    Except as specified in paragraph (j) of this AD: Comply with all
required actions and compliance times specified in, and in
accordance with, EASA AD 2019-0141. Accomplishing the maintenance or
inspection program revision required by this paragraph terminates
the requirements of paragraph (g) of this AD.

(j) Exceptions to EASA AD 2019-0141

    (1) The requirements specified in paragraphs (1), (2), (4), and
(5) of EASA AD 2019-0141 do not apply to this AD.
    (2) Paragraph (3) of EASA AD 2019-0141 specifies revising ``the
approved AMP'' within 12 months after its effective date, but this
AD requires revising the existing maintenance or inspection program,
as applicable, to incorporate the ``limitations, tasks and
associated thresholds and intervals'' specified in paragraph (3) of
EASA AD 2019-0141 within 90 days after the effective date of this
AD.
    (3) The initial compliance time for doing the tasks specified in
paragraph (3) of EASA AD 2019-0141 is at the applicable ``associated
thresholds'' specified in paragraph (3) of EASA AD 2019-0141, or
within 90 days after the effective date of this AD, whichever occurs
later.
    (4) The ``Remarks'' section of EASA AD 2019-0141 does not apply
to this AD.

(k) New Provisions for Alternative Actions and Intervals

    After the maintenance or inspection program has been revised as
required by paragraph (i) of this AD, no alternative actions (e.g.,
inspections) or intervals are allowed except as specified in the
provisions of the ``Ref. Publications'' section of EASA AD 2019-
0141.

(l) Other FAA AD Provisions

    The following provisions also apply to this AD:
    (1) Alternative Methods of Compliance (AMOCs): The Manager,
Large Aircraft Section, International Validation Branch, FAA, has
the authority to approve AMOCs for this AD, if requested using the
procedures found in 14 CFR 39.19. In accordance with 14 CFR 39.19,
send your request to your principal inspector or local Flight
Standards District Office, as appropriate. If sending information
directly to the Large Aircraft Section, International Validation
Branch, send it to the attention of the person identified in
paragraph (m) of this AD. Information may be emailed to<EMAIL_ADDRESS>    (i) Before using any approved AMOC, notify your appropriate
principal inspector, or lacking a principal inspector, the manager
of the local flight standards district office/certificate holding
district office.
    (ii) AMOCs approved previously for AD 2019-07-01 are approved as
AMOCs for the corresponding provisions of EASA AD 2019-0141 that are
required by paragraph (g) of this AD.
    (2) Contacting the Manufacturer: For any requirement in this AD
to obtain instructions from a manufacturer, the instructions must be
accomplished using a method approved by the Manager, Large Aircraft
Section, International Validation Branch, FAA; or EASA; or Dassault
Aviation's EASA Design Organization Approval (DOA). If approved by
the DOA, the approval must include the DOA-authorized signature.

(m) Related Information

    For more information about this AD, contact Tom Rodriguez,
Aerospace Engineer, Large Aircraft Section, International Validation
Branch, FAA, 2200 South 216th St., Des Moines, WA 98198; telephone
and fax<PHONE_NUMBER>; email<EMAIL_ADDRESS>
(n) Material Incorporated by Reference

    (1) The Director of the Federal Register approved the
incorporation by reference (IBR) of the service information listed
in this paragraph under 5 U.S.C. 552(a) and 1 CFR part 51.
    (2) You must use this service information as applicable to do
the actions required by this AD, unless this AD specifies otherwise.
    (3) The following service information was approved for IBR on
December 23, 2020.
    (i) European Union Aviation Safety Agency (EASA) AD 2019-0141,
dated June 17, 2019.
    (ii) [Reserved]
    (4) The following service information was approved for IBR on
May 24, 2019 (84 FR 16390, April 19, 2019).
    (i) Chapter 5-40, Airworthiness Limitations, DGT 131028,
Revision 17, dated September 2017, of the Dassault Aviation Falcon
20 Maintenance Manual.
    (ii) [Reserved]
    (5) For EASA AD 2019-0141, contact the EASA, Konrad-Adenauer-
Ufer 3, 50668 Cologne, Germany; telephone +49 221 8999 000; email
<EMAIL_ADDRESS>internet www.easa.europa.eu. You may find this
EASA AD on the EASA website at https://ad.easa.europa.eu.
    (6) For Dassault Aviation material, contact Dassault Falcon Jet
Corporation, Teterboro Airport, P.O. Box 2000, South Hackensack, NJ
07606; telephone<PHONE_NUMBER>; internet https://www.dassaultfalcon.com.
    (7) You may view this material at the FAA, Airworthiness
Products Section, Operational Safety Branch, 2200 South 216th St.,
Des Moines, WA. For information on the availability of this material
at the FAA, call<PHONE_NUMBER>. This material may be found in the AD
docket on the internet at https://www.regulations.gov by searching
for and locating Docket No. FAA-2020-0582.
    (8) You may view this material that is incorporated by reference
at the National Archives and Records Administration (NARA). For
information on the availability of this material at NARA, email
<EMAIL_ADDRESS>or go to: https://www.archives.gov/federal-register/cfr/ibr-locations.html.

    Issued on November 4, 2020.
Lance T. Gant,
Director, Compliance & Airworthiness Division, Aircraft Certification
Service.
[FR Doc. 2020-25387 Filed 11-17-20; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910-13-P


[Federal Register Volume 81, Number 145 (Thursday, July 28, 2016)]
[Notices]
[Page 49649]
[FR Doc No: 2016-17898]

=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY

[FRL-9949-83-Region 4]

Public Water System Supervision Program Revision for the State of
Florida

AGENCY: Environmental Protection Agency (EPA).

ACTION: Notice of tentative approval.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: Notice is hereby given that the State of Florida is revising
its approved Public Water System Supervision Program. Florida has
adopted the following rules: Stage 2 Disinfectants and Disinfection
Byproducts Rule, Long Term 2 Enhanced Surface Water Treatment Rule, and
Ground Water Rule. The Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) has
determined that Florida's rules are no less stringent than the
corresponding federal regulations. Therefore, EPA is tentatively
approving this revision to the State of Florida's Public Water System
Supervision Program.

DATES: Any interested person may request a public hearing. A request
for a public hearing must be submitted by August 29, 2016, to the
Regional Administrator at the EPA Region 4 address shown below. The
Regional Administrator may deny frivolous or insubstantial requests for
a hearing. However, if a substantial request for a public hearing is
made by August 29, 2016, a public hearing will be held. If no timely
and appropriate request for a hearing is received and the Regional
Administrator does not elect to hold a hearing on her own motion, this
tentative approval shall become final and effective on August 29, 2016.
Any request for a public hearing shall include the following
information: The name, address, and telephone number of the individual,
organization, or other entity requesting a hearing; a brief statement
of the requesting person's interest in the Regional Administrator's
determination and a brief statement of the information that the
requesting person intends to submit at such hearing; and the signature
of the individual making the request, or, if the request is made on
behalf of an organization or other entity, the signature of a
responsible official of the organization or other entity.

ADDRESSES: All documents relating to this determination are available
for inspection between the hours of 8:30 a.m. and 4:30 p.m., Monday
through Friday, at the following offices: Florida Department of
Environmental Protection, Drinking Water and Aquifer Protection
Program, 2600 Blair Stone Road, Tallahassee, Florida 32399; and the
U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Region 4, Drinking Water Section,
61 Forsyth Street SW., Atlanta, Georgia 30303.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Dale Froneberger, EPA Region 4,
Drinking Water Section, by mail at the Atlanta address given above, by
telephone at<PHONE_NUMBER>, or by email at<EMAIL_ADDRESS>
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: On March 20, 2013, the State of Florida
submitted requests that EPA Region 4 approve a revision to the State's
Safe Drinking Water Act Public Water System Supervision Program to
include the authority to implement and enforce the Stage 2
Disinfectants and Disinfection Byproducts Rule, the Long Term 2
Enhanced Surface Water Treatment Rule, and the Ground Water Rule. For
the requests to be approved, EPA must find the state rules codified at
Chapters 62-550 and 62-560, F.A.C., to be no less stringent than the
federal rules codified at 40 CFR part 141, subpart A--General; 40 CFR
part 141, subpart C--Monitoring and Analytical Requirements; 40 CFR
part 141, subpart D--Reporting and Recordkeeping; 40 CFR part 141,
subpart G--Maximum Contaminant Levels and Maximum Residual Disinfectant
Levels; 40 CFR part 141, subpart L--Disinfectant Residuals,
Disinfection Byproducts, and Disinfection Byproduct Precursors; 40 CFR
part 141, subpart O--Consumer Confidence Reports; 40 CFR part 141,
subpart Q--Public Notification of Drinking Water Violations; 40 CFR
part 141, subpart S--Ground Water Rule; 40 CFR part 141, subpart U--
Initial Distribution System Evaluations; 40 CFR part 141, subpart V--
Stage 2 Disinfection Byproducts Requirements; and 40 CFR part 141,
subpart W--Enhanced Treatment for Cryptosporidium. EPA reviewed the
applications using the federal statutory provisions (Section 1413 of
the Safe Drinking Water Act), federal regulations (at 40 CFR part 142),
state regulations, rule crosswalks, and EPA regulatory guidance to
determine whether the requests for revision are approvable. EPA
determined that the Florida regulations are no less stringent than the
corresponding federal regulations and is tentatively approving this
revision. If EPA does not receive a timely and appropriate request for
a hearing and the Regional Administrator does not elect to hold a
hearing on her own motion, this approval will become final and
effective on August 29, 2016.

    Authority: Section 1413 of the Safe Drinking Water Act, as
amended (1996), and 40 CFR part 142.

    Dated: June 1, 2016.
Heather McTeer Toney,
Regional Administrator, Region 4.
[FR Doc. 2016-17898 Filed 7-27-16; 8:45 am]
 BILLING CODE 6560-50-P


[Federal Register Volume 84, Number 160 (Monday, August 19, 2019)]
[Notices]
[Pages 42938-42939]
[FR Doc No: 2019-17738]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY

Coast Guard

[Docket No. USCG-2019-0262]

Information Collection Request to Office of Management and
Budget; OMB Control Number: 1625-0056

AGENCY: Coast Guard, DHS.

ACTION: Sixty-day notice requesting comments.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: In compliance with the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995, the
U.S. Coast Guard intends to submit an Information Collection Request
(ICR) to the Office of Management and Budget (OMB), Office of
Information and Regulatory Affairs (OIRA), requesting an extension of
its approval for the collection of information classified under OMB
Control Number 1625-0056; without change. This collection of
information is used for issuing vessel serial numbers and lables for
the following: Hull Identification Numbers; U.S. Cast Guard Maximum
Capacities; Gasoline Fuel Tank; USCG Type Fuel Hose and Certified
Navigation Light Labels. Our ICR describes the information we seek to
collect from the public. Before submitting this ICR to OIRA, the Coast
Guard is inviting comments as described below.

DATES: Comments must reach the Coast Guard on or before October 18,
2019.

ADDRESSES: You may submit comments identified by Coast Guard docket
number [USCG-2019-0262] to the Coast Guard using the Federal
eRulemaking Portal at https://www.regulations.gov. See the ``Public
participation and request for comments'' portion of the SUPPLEMENTARY
INFORMATION section for further instructions on submitting comments.

    A copy of the ICR is available through the docket on the internet
at https://www.regulations.gov. Additionally, copies are available
from: COMMANDANT (CG-612), ATTN: PAPERWORK REDUCTION ACT MANAGER, U.S.
COAST GUARD, 2703 MARTIN LUTHER KING JR. AVE SE, STOP 7710, WASHINGTON,
DC 20593-7710.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Mr. Anthony Smith, Office of
Information Management, telephone<PHONE_NUMBER>, or fax<PHONE_NUMBER>,
for questions on these documents.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

Public Participation and Request for Comments

    This notice relies on the authority of the Paperwork Reduction Act
of 1995; 44 U.S.C. chapter 35, as amended. An ICR is an application to
OIRA seeking the approval, extension, or renewal of a Coast Guard
collection of information (Collection). The ICR contains information
describing the Collection's purpose, the Collection's likely burden on
the affected public, an explanation of the necessity of the Collection,
and other important information describing the Collection. There is one
ICR for each Collection.
    The Coast Guard invites comments on whether this ICR should be
granted based on the Collection being necessary for the proper
performance of Departmental functions. In particular, the Coast Guard
would appreciate comments addressing: (1) The practical utility of the
Collection; (2) the accuracy of the estimated burden of the Collection;
(3) ways to enhance the quality, utility, and clarity of information
subject to the Collection; and (4) ways to minimize the burden of the
Collection on respondents, including the use of automated collection
techniques or other forms of information technology. Consistent with
the requirements of Executive Order 13771, Reducing Regulation and
Controlling Regulatory Costs, and Executive Order 13777, Enforcing the
Regulatory Reform Agenda, the Coast Guard is also requesting comments
on the extent to which this request for information could be modified
to reduce the burden on respondents.
    In response to your comments, we may revise the this ICR or decide
not to seek an extension of approval for the Collection. We will
consider all comments and material received during the comment period.
    We encourage you to respond to this request by submitting comments
and related materials. Comments must contain the OMB Control Number of
the ICR and the docket number of this request, [USCG-2019-0262], and
must be received by October 18, 2019.

Submitting Comments

    We encourage you to submit comments through the Federal eRulemaking
Portal at https://www.regulations.gov. If your material cannot be
submitted using https://www.regulations.gov, contact the person in the
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT section of this document for alternate
instructions. Documents mentioned in this notice, and all public
comments, are in our online docket at https://www.regulations.gov and
can be viewed by following that website's instructions. Additionally,
if you go to the online docket and sign up for email alerts, you will
be notified when comments are posted.
    We accept anonymous comments. All comments received will be posted
without change to https://www.regulations.gov and will include any
personal information you have provided. For more about privacy and the
docket, you may review a Privacy Act notice regarding the Federal
Docket Management System in the March 24, 2005, issue of the Federal
Register (70 FR 15086).

Information Collection Request

    Title: Labeling required in 33 CFR parts 181 and 183 and 46 CFR
25.10-3.
    OMB Control Number: 1625-0056.
    Summary: Parts 181 and 183 of Title 33, Code of Federal Regulations
and 46 CFR 25.10-3 contain the regulations and safety standards
authorized by the statutes which apply to manufacturers of recreational
boats, un-inspected commercial vessels and associated equipment. The
requlations and safety standards contain information colletions, which
require boat and associated equipment manufacturers, importers and the
boating public to apply for serial numbers and to display various
labels evidencing compliance: Hull Identification Numbers; U.S. Coast
Guard Maximum Capacities Label; Gasoline Fuel Tank Label; USCG Type
Fuel Hose Label; and Certified Navigation Light Label.
    Need: Title 46 U.S.C. 4302(a)(3) gives the Coast Guard the
authority to require the display of seals, labels, plates, insignia, or
other devices for certifying or evidencing compliance with safety
regulations and standards of the United States Government for
recreational vessels and associated equipment.
    Forms: CG-9070, Application for Manufacturer Identification Code
(MIC).
    Respondents: Manufacturers of boats, fuel tanks, fuel hoses and
navigation lights.
    Frequency: Once.
    Hour Burden Estimate: The estimated burden has increased from
204,996 hours to 216,144 hours a year, due to the estimated annual
number of responses.
    Authority: The Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995; 44 U.S.C. chapter
35, as amended.

    Dated: August 13, 2019.
James D. Roppel,
U.S. Coast Guard, Chief, Office of Information Management.
[FR Doc. 2019-17738 Filed 8-16-19; 8:45 am]
 BILLING CODE 9110-04-P


[Federal Register: April 10, 2006 (Volume 71, Number 68)]
[Notices]
[Page 18119]
[DOCID:fr10ap06-92]

=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

Submission for OMB Review; Comment Request

Upon written request, copies available from: Securities and Exchange
Commission, Office of Filings and Information Services, Washington, DC
20549.

Extension: Rule 30b2-1; SEC File No. 270-213; and OMB Control No.
3235-0220.

    Notice is hereby given that, pursuant to the Paperwork Reduction
Act of 1995 (44 U.S.C. 3501 et seq.), the Securities and Exchange
Commission (``Commission'') has submitted to the Office of Management
and Budget requests for extension of the previously approved collection
of information discussed below.
    Rule 30b2-1 under the Investment Company Act of 1940 (17 CFR
270.30b2-1) requires the filing of four copies of every periodic or
interim report transmitted by or on behalf of any registered investment
company to its stockholders.\1\ This requirement ensures that the
Commission has information in its files to perform its regulatory
functions and to apprise investors of the operational and financial
condition of registered investment companies.\2\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \1\ Most filings are made via the Commission's electronic filing
system; therefore, paper filings under Rule 30b2-1 occur only in
exceptional circumstances. Electronic filing eliminates the need for
multiple copies of filings.
    \2\ Annual and periodic reports to the Commission become part of
its public files and, therefore, are available for use by
prospective investors and stockholders.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    Registered management investment companies are required to send
reports to stockholders at least twice annually. In addition, under the
recently adopted amendments to rule 30b2-1, each registered investment
company is required to file with the Commission new form N-CSR,
certifying the financial statements.\3\ The annual burden of filing the
reports is included in the burden estimate for Form N-CSR; however, we
are requesting one burden hour remain in inventory for administrative
purposes.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \3\ See Release No. 34-47262, IC-25914, Jan. 27, 2003 (68 FR
5384 [Feb. 3, 2003]). (Amending rule 30b2-1(a) under the Investment
Company Act; adopting Form N-CSR). In addition, the Commission
amended new rule 30a-2 to require both Forms N-CSR and N-SAR to
include the certification required by Section 302 of the Sarbanes-
Oxley Act. No certified shareholder report on Form N-CSR is required
with respect to a report to shareholders that is not required under
rule 30e-1 under the Investment Company Act [17 CFR 270.30e-1],
e.g., voluntary quarterly reports. These reports to shareholders
continue to be filed with the Commission as they were prior to the
2003 amendments. Rule 30b2-1(b) [17 CFR 270.30b2-1(b)].
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    The burden estimate for rule 30b2-1 is made solely for the purposes
of the Act and is not derived from a comprehensive or even
representative survey or study of the costs of Commission rules and
forms.
    The collection of information under rule 30b2-1 is mandatory. The
information provided by rule 30b2-1 is not kept confidential. An Agency
may not conduct or sponsor, and a person is not required to respond to,
a collection of information unless it displays a currently valid OMB
control number.
    General comments regarding the above information should be directed
to the following persons: (i) Desk Officer for the Securities and
Exchange Commission, Office of Information and Regulatory Affairs,
Office of Management and Budget, Room 10102, New Executive Office
Building, Washington, DC 20503, or e-mail to
<EMAIL_ADDRESS>and (ii) R. Corey Booth, Director/Chief

Information Officer, Securities and Exchange Commission, C/O Shirley
Martinson, 6432 General Green Way, Alexandria, Va. 22312 or send an e-
mail to<EMAIL_ADDRESS>Comments must be submitted to the Office
of Management and Budget within 30 days of this notice.

    Dated: April 3, 2006.
Nancy M. Morris,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. E6-5181 Filed 4-7-06; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 8010-01-P


[Federal Register Volume 82, Number 94 (Wednesday, May 17, 2017)]
[Notices]
[Pages 22662-22663]
[FR Doc No: 2017-09954]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission

[Docket No. ER17-1578-000]

Keni Energy LLC; Supplemental Notice That Initial Market-Based
Rate Filing Includes Request for Blanket Section 204 Authorization

    This is a supplemental notice in the above-referenced proceeding of
Keni Energy LLC's application for market-based rate authority, with an
accompanying rate tariff, noting that such application includes a
request for blanket authorization, under 18 CFR part 34, of future
issuances of securities and assumptions of liability.
    Any person desiring to intervene or to protest should file with the
Federal Energy Regulatory Commission, 888 First Street NE., Washington,
DC 20426, in accordance with Rules 211 and 214 of the Commission's
Rules of Practice and Procedure (18 CFR 385.211 and 385.214). Anyone
filing a motion to intervene or protest must serve a copy of that
document on the Applicant.
    Notice is hereby given that the deadline for filing protests with
regard to the applicant's request for blanket authorization, under 18
CFR part 34, of future issuances of securities and assumptions of
liability, is May 31, 2017.
    The Commission encourages electronic submission of protests and
interventions in lieu of paper, using the FERC Online links at http://www.ferc.gov. To facilitate electronic service, persons with Internet
access who will eFile a document and/or be listed as a contact for an
intervenor

must create and validate an eRegistration account using the
eRegistration link. Select the eFiling link to log on and submit the
intervention or protests.
    Persons unable to file electronically should submit an original and
5 copies of the intervention or protest to the Federal Energy
Regulatory Commission, 888 First Street NE., Washington, DC 20426.
    The filings in the above-referenced proceeding are accessible in
the Commission's eLibrary system by clicking on the appropriate link in
the above list. They are also available for electronic review in the
Commission's Public Reference Room in Washington, DC. There is an
eSubscription link on the Web site that enables subscribers to receive
email notification when a document is added to a subscribed docket(s).
For assistance with any FERC Online service, please email
<EMAIL_ADDRESS>or call<PHONE_NUMBER> (toll free). For
TTY, call<PHONE_NUMBER>.

    Dated: May 11, 2017.
Kimberly D. Bose,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2017-09954 Filed 5-16-17; 8:45 am]
 BILLING CODE 6717-01-P


[Federal Register: July 25, 2006 (Volume 71, Number 142)]
[Notices]
[Page 42139]
[DOCID:fr25jy06-112]

=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

Proposed Collection; Comment Request

Upon written request, copies available from: Securities and Exchange
Commission, Office of Filings and Information Services, Washington, DC
20549.

Extension: Rule 15c3-4; SEC File No. 270-441; OMB Control No. 3235-
0497.

    Notice is hereby given that pursuant to the Paperwork Reduction Act
of 1995 (44 U.S.C. 3501 et seq.), the Securities and Exchange
Commission (``Commission'') is soliciting comments on the collection of
information summarized below. The Commission plans to submit this
existing collection of information to the Office of Management and
Budget for extension and approval.
    Rule 15c3-4 (17 CFR 240.15c3-4) (the ``Rule'') under the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78a et seq.) (the ``Exchange Act'')
requires certain broker-dealers that are registered with the Commission
as OTC Derivatives Dealers to establish, document, and maintain a
system of internal risk management controls. The Rule sets forth the
basic elements for an OTC Derivatives Dealer to consider and include
when establishing, documenting, and reviewing its internal risk
management control system, which are designed to, among other things,
ensure the integrity of an OTC Derivatives Dealer's risk measurement,
monitoring, and management process, to clarify accountability at the
appropriate organizational level, and to define the permitted scope of
the dealer's activities and level of risk. The Rule also requires that
management of an OTC Derivatives Dealer must periodically review, in
accordance with written procedures, the OTC Derivatives Dealer's
business activities for consistency with its risk management
guidelines.
    The staff estimates that the average amount of time an OTC
Derivatives Dealer will spend implementing its risk management control
system is 2,000 hours and that, on average, an OTC Derivatives Dealer
will spend approximately 200 hours each year reviewing and updating its
risk management control system. Currently, five firms are registered
with the Commission as an OTC Derivatives Dealer. The staff estimates
that approximately one additional OTC Derivatives Dealer may become
registered within the next three years. Accordingly, the staff
estimates the total cost burden for six OTC Derivatives Dealers to be
1,200 hours annually.
    The staff believes that the cost of complying with Rule 15c3-4 will
be approximately $205 per hour.\1\ This per hour cost is based upon the
annual average hourly salary for a compliance manager, who would
generally be responsible for initially establishing, documenting, and
maintaining an OTC Derivatives Dealer's internal risk management
control system. The total annual cost for all affected OTC Derivatives
Dealers is estimated to be $136,700, based on one firm spending 2,000
hours to implement an internal risk management control system at $205
per hour within the next three years.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \1\ Based on the average annual salary for a Compliance Manager
based inside New York City of about $69,000, as reflected in SIA
Management and Professional Earnings for 2005, modified to account
for a 1,800-hour work-year and multiplied by 5.35 to account for
bonuses, firm size, employee benefits and overhead.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    Written comments are invited on: (a) Whether the proposed
collection of information is necessary for the proper performance of
the functions of the agency, including whether the information will
have practical utility; (b) the accuracy of the agency's estimate of
the burden of the collection of information; (c) ways to enhance the
quality, utility, and clarity of the information collected; and (d)
ways to minimize the burden of the collection of information on
respondents, including through the use of automated collection
techniques or other forms of information technology. Consideration will
be given to comments and suggestions submitted in writing within 60
days of this publication.
    Please direct your written comments to R. Corey Booth, Director/
Chief Information Officer, Securities and Exchange Commission, c/o
Shirley Martinson, 6432 General Green Way, Alexandria, Virginia 22312
or send an e-mail to<EMAIL_ADDRESS>Comments must be submitted
to OMB within 60 days of this notice.

    Dated: July 17, 2006.
Nancy M. Morris,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. E6-11789 Filed 7-24-06; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 8010-01-P