[Federal Register Volume 87, Number 169 (Thursday, September 1, 2022)]
[Notices]
[Page 53823]
[FR Doc No: 2022-18926]

=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION

Federal Aviation Administration

[Docket No. FAA-2022-1172]

Agency Information Collection Activities: Requests for Comments;
Clearance of a Renewed Approval of Information Collection: FAA
Acquisition Management System (FAAAMS)

AGENCY: Federal Aviation Administration (FAA), DOT.

ACTION: Notice and request for comments.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: In accordance with the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995, FAA
invites public comments about FAA's intention to request Office of
Management and Budget (OMB) approval to renew an information
collection. The collection involves the FAA Acquisition Management
System (FAAAMS) and information collected in response to notices
regarding FAA acquisitions. The information to be collected is
necessary to solicit, award, and administer contracts for supplies,
equipment, services, facilities, and real property to fulfill FAA's
mission.

DATES: Written comments should be submitted by October 31, 2022.

ADDRESSES: Please send written comments:
    By Electronic Docket: www.regulations.gov (Enter docket number into
search field).
    By mail: Monica Rheinhardt, Federal Aviation Administration (AAP-
110), 800 Independence Ave. SW, FOB-10A, Room 439, Washington, DC
20591.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Monica Rheinhardt, by email at:
[email protected], phone:<PHONE_NUMBER>.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
    Public Comments Invited: You are asked to comment on any aspect of
this information collection, including (a) Whether the proposed
collection of information is necessary for FAA's performance; (b) the
accuracy of the estimated burden; (c) ways for FAA to enhance the
quality, utility and clarity of the information collection; and (d)
ways that the burden could be minimized without reducing the quality of
the collected information. The agency will summarize and/or include
your comments in the request for OMB's clearance of this information
collection.
    OMB Control Number: 2120-0595.
    Title: FAA Acquisition Management System (FAAAMS).
    FAA FAST Home Page: https://fast.faa.gov/.
    Type of Review: Renewal of an information collection.
    Background: The FAAAMS establishes policies and internal procedures
for FAA acquisition. Section 348 of Public Law 104-50 directed FAA to
establish an acquisition system. The information collection is carried
out as an integral part of FAA's acquisition process. Various portions
of the AMS describe information needed from vendors seeking or already
doing business with FAA. FAA's contracting offices collect the
information to plan, solicit, award, administer and close individual
contracts. FAA's small business office collects information to promote
and increase small business participation in FAA contracts. AMS
requires information collection through a series of forms in the areas
of (1) Solicitations and (2) Post-Award Contract Administration.
    Solicitations: The FAA utilizes solicitations to evaluate vendor-
specific technical solutions, capabilities, and other qualifications
such as subcontracting plans that may result in the award of a contract
for a defined FAA need. The extent and nature of the information
required from vendors varies depending on the nature of the goods and/
or services procured, as well as the size and complexity of the FAA
requirements.
    Post-Award Contract Administration: Depending on the complexity and
size of the contract, various activities are ongoing after contract
award in areas such as bonds (e.g., construction contracts), small
business subcontracting (e.g., applying to large businesses), the
tracking and management of Government Property, and invoicing. Contract
modifications vary from routine administrative updates to major
additions of work.

Solicitations

    Respondents: 3,461.
    Frequency: 1 time.
    Estimated Average Burden per Response: 3 hours.
    Estimated Total Annual Burden: 10,383 hours.

Post-Award Contract Administration

    Respondents: 10,177.
    Frequency: 3 times.
    Estimated Average Burden per Response: 23.
    Estimated Total Annual Burden: 702,213 hours.

    Issued in Washington, DC, on August 29, 2022.
Michelle G. Brune,
AAP-100 Division Manager.
[FR Doc. 2022-18926 Filed 8-31-22; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910-13-P


[Federal Register: October 5, 2010 (Volume 75, Number 192)]
[Notices]
[Page 61479-61480]
[DOCID:fr05oc10-90]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission

[Project No. 13801-000]

Kendall Head Tidal Energy Project; Notice of Preliminary Permit
Application Accepted for Filing and Soliciting Comments, Motions To
Intervene, and Competing Applications

September 24, 2010.
    On June 29, 2010, ORPC Maine, LLC (ORPC Maine) filed an application
for a preliminary permit, pursuant to section 4(f) of the Federal Power
Act, proposing to study the feasibility of the Kendall Head Tidal
Energy Project, located in the Western Passage in the Atlantic Ocean in
Washington County, Maine. The sole purpose of a preliminary permit, if
issued, is to grant the permit holder priority to file a license
application during the permit term. A preliminary permit does not
authorize the permit holder to perform any land-disturbing activities
or otherwise enter upon lands or waters owned by others without the
owners' express permission.
    The proposed project would consist of: (1) 4 OCGen\TM\ hydrokinetic
tidal devices each consisting of two 150-kilowatt turbine generator
units for a combined capacity of 1,200 kilowatts; (2) an anchoring
support structure; (3) a mooring system; (4) a 2,700-foot-long
submersible cable connecting the turbine-generating units to a shore
station; (5) a 8,500-foot-long, 34.5-kilovolt transmission line
connecting the shore station to an existing distribution line; and (6)
appurtenant facilities. The estimated annual generation of the Kendall
Head Tidal Energy Project would be 3.12 to 3.96 gigawatt-hours.
    Applicant Contact: Christopher R. Sauer, President and CEO, Ocean
Renewable Power Company, LLC, 120 Exchange Street, Suite 508, Portland,
Maine 04101; phone:<PHONE_NUMBER>.
    FERC Contact: Michael Watts,<PHONE_NUMBER>.
    Deadline for filing comments, motions to intervene, competing
applications (without notices of intent), or notices of intent to file
competing applications: 60 days from the issuance of this notice.
Competing applications and notices of intent must meet the requirements
of 18 CFR 4.36. Comments, motions to intervene, notices of intent, and
competing applications may be filed electronically via the Internet.
See 18 CFR 385.2001(a)(1)(iii) and the instructions on the Commission's
Web site (http://www.ferc.gov/docs-filing/ferconline.asp) under the
``eFiling'' link. For a simpler method of submitting text only
comments, click on ``Quick Comment.'' For assistance, please contact
FERC Online Support at<EMAIL_ADDRESS>call toll-free at
(866) 208-3676; or, for TTY, contact<PHONE_NUMBER>. Although the
Commission strongly encourages electronic filing, documents may also be
paper-filed. To paper-file, mail an original and eight copies to:
Kimberly D. Bose, Secretary, Federal Energy Regulatory Commission, 888
First Street, NE., Washington, DC 20426.
    More information about this project, including a copy of the
application, can be viewed or printed on the ``eLibrary'' link of
Commission's Web site at http://www.ferc.gov/docs-filing/elibrary.asp.
Enter the docket number (P-13801) in the docket number field to

access the document. For assistance, contact FERC Online Support.

Kimberly D. Bose,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2010-24936 Filed 10-4-10; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6717-01-P


[Federal Register Volume 79, Number 246 (Tuesday, December 23, 2014)]
[Notices]
[Page 77003]
[FR Doc No: 2014-30036]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY

[FRL-9920-56-OEI]

Cross-Media Electronic Reporting: Authorized Program Revision
Approval, San Joaquin Valley Air Pollution Control District

AGENCY: Environmental Protection Agency (EPA).

ACTION: Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: This notice announces EPA's approval of the San Joaquin Valley
Air Pollution Control District's request to revise its State Operating
Permit Programs EPA-authorized program to allow electronic reporting.

DATES: EPA's approval is effective December 23, 2014.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Karen Seeh, U.S. Environmental
Protection Agency, Office of Environmental Information, Mail Stop
2823T, 1200 Pennsylvania Avenue NW., Washington, DC 20460, (202) 566-
1175<EMAIL_ADDRESS>
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: On October 13, 2005, the final Cross-Media
Electronic Reporting Rule (CROMERR) was published in the Federal
Register (70 FR 59848) and codified as part 3 of title 40 of the CFR.
CROMERR establishes electronic reporting as an acceptable regulatory
alternative to paper reporting and establishes requirements to assure
that electronic documents are as legally dependable as their paper
counterparts. Subpart D of CROMERR requires that state, tribal or local
government agencies that receive, or wish to begin receiving,
electronic reports under their EPA-authorized programs must apply to
EPA for a revision or modification of those programs and obtain EPA
approval. Subpart D provides standards for such approvals based on
consideration of the electronic document receiving systems that the
state, tribe, or local government will use to implement the electronic
reporting. Additionally, Sec.  3.1000(b) through (e) of 40 CFR part 3,
subpart D provides special procedures for program revisions and
modifications to allow electronic reporting, to be used at the option
of the state, tribe or local government in place of procedures
available under existing program-specific authorization regulations. An
application submitted under the subpart D procedures must show that the
state, tribe or local government has sufficient legal authority to
implement the electronic reporting components of the programs covered
by the application and will use electronic document receiving systems
that meet the applicable subpart D requirements.
    On February 3, 2012, the San Joaquin Valley Air Pollution Control
District (SJVAPCD) submitted an application entitled ``San Joaquin
Valley Air Pollution Control District Title V Electronic Reporting
System'' for revision of its EPA-authorized authorized Part 70 program
under title 40 CFR. EPA reviewed SJVAPCD's request to revise its EPA-
authorized Part 70--State Operating Permit Programs program and, based
on this review, EPA determined that the application met the standards
for approval of authorized program revision set out in 40 CFR part 3,
subpart D. In accordance with 40 CFR 3.1000(d), this notice of EPA's
decision to approve the District's request to revise its Part 70--State
Operating Permit Programs program to allow electronic reporting under
40 CFR part 70 is being published in the Federal Register.
    SJVAPCD was notified of EPA's determination to approve its
application with respect to the authorized program listed above.

Matthew Leopard,
Acting Director, Office of Information Collection.
[FR Doc. 2014-30036 Filed 12-22-14; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6560-50-P


[Federal Register Volume 85, Number 125 (Monday, June 29, 2020)]
[Notices]
[Page 38886]
[FR Doc No: 2020-13908]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission

Combined Notice of Filings

    Take notice that the Commission has received the following Natural
Gas Pipeline Rate and Refund Report filings:

    Docket Numbers: RP19-810-000.
    Applicants: Tallgrass Interstate Gas Transmission, L, Trailblazer
Pipeline Company LLC, Rockies Express Pipeline LLC.
    Description: Request for Additional Time to Implement NAESB
Standards of the Tallgrass Pipelines under RP19-810, et al.
    Filed Date: 6/18/20.
    Accession Number: 20200618-5157.
    Comments Due: 5 p.m. ET 6/30/20.

    Docket Numbers: RP19-811-000.
    Applicants: Tallgrass Interstate Gas Transmission, L, Trailblazer
Pipeline Company LLC, Rockies Express Pipeline LLC.
    Description: Request for Additional Time to Implement NAESB
Standards of the Tallgrass Pipelines under RP19-810, et al.
    Filed Date: 6/18/20.
    Accession Number: 20200618-5157.
    Comments Due: 5 p.m. ET 6/30/20.

    Docket Numbers: RP19-812-000.
    Applicants: Tallgrass Interstate Gas Transmission, L, Trailblazer
Pipeline Company LLC, Rockies Express Pipeline LLC.
    Description: Request for Additional Time to Implement NAESB
Standards of the Tallgrass Pipelines under RP19-810, et al.
    Filed Date: 6/18/20.
    Accession Number: 20200618-5157.
    Comments Due: 5 p.m. ET 6/30/20.

    Docket Numbers: RP20-962-000.
    Applicants: Texas Eastern Transmission, LP.
    Description: Sec.  4(d) Rate Filing: Negotiated Rates--Chevron
Release to Eco eff 07-01-20 to be effective 7/1/2020.
    Filed Date: 6/22/20.
    Accession Number: 20200622-5165.
    Comments Due: 5 p.m. ET 7/6/20.

    Docket Numbers: RP20-963-000.
    Applicants: Lake Charles LNG Company, LLC.
    Description: Tariff Cancellation: Cancellation of Tariff to be
effective 8/21/2020.
    Filed Date: 6/22/20.
    Accession Number: 20200622-5166.
    Comments Due: 5 p.m. ET 7/6/20.

    Docket Numbers: RP20-964-000.
    Applicants: Saltville Gas Storage Company L.L.C.
    Description: Sec.  4(d) Rate Filing: Saltville Cleanup Filing to be
effective 7/22/2020.
    Filed Date: 6/22/20.
    Accession Number: 20200622-5167.
    Comments Due: 5 p.m. ET 7/6/20.

    The filings are accessible in the Commission's eLibrary system by
clicking on the links or querying the docket number.
    Any person desiring to intervene or protest in any of the above
proceedings must file in accordance with Rules 211 and 214 of the
Commission's Regulations (18 CFR 385.211 and 385.214) on or before 5:00
p.m. Eastern time on the specified date(s). Protests may be considered,
but intervention is necessary to become a party to the proceeding.
    eFiling is encouraged. More detailed information relating to filing
requirements, interventions, protests, service, and qualifying
facilities filings can be found at: http://www.ferc.gov/docs-filing/efiling/filing-req.pdf. For other information, call<PHONE_NUMBER>
(toll free). For TTY, call<PHONE_NUMBER>.

    Dated: June 23, 2020.
Nathaniel J. Davis, Sr.,
Deputy Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2020-13908 Filed 6-26-20; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6717-01-P


[Federal Register Volume 84, Number 33 (Tuesday, February 19, 2019)]
[Notices]
[Pages 4826-4828]
[FR Doc No: 2019-02598]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES

Food and Drug Administration

[Docket No. FDA-2019-D-0065]

Competitive Generic Therapies; Draft Guidance for Industry;
Availability

AGENCY: Food and Drug Administration, HHS.

ACTION: Notice of availability.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Food and Drug Administration (FDA or Agency) is announcing
the availability of a draft guidance for industry entitled
``Competitive Generic Therapies.'' On August 18, 2017, the FDA
Reauthorization Act of 2017 (FDARA), which amended the Federal Food,
Drug, and Cosmetic Act (FD&C Act), was signed into law. Under FDARA, a
section was added to the FD&C Act that established a new process to
designate, and expedite the development and review of, certain drugs
intended for submission or submitted in an abbreviated new drug
application (ANDA) and for which there is ``inadequate generic
competition.'' This draft guidance provides a description of the
process that applicants should follow to request designation of a drug
as a competitive generic therapy (CGT) and the criteria for designating
a drug as a CGT. This draft guidance also includes information on the
actions FDA may take to expedite the development and review of an ANDA
for a drug designated as a CGT. This draft guidance also provides
information on how FDA implements the statutory provisions providing
for a 180-day exclusivity period for certain first approved applicants
that submit ANDAs for drugs designated as CGTs.

DATES: Submit either electronic or written comments on the draft
guidance by April 22, 2019 to ensure that the Agency considers your
comment on this draft guidance before it begins work on the final
version of the guidance.

ADDRESSES: You may submit comments on any guidance at any time as
follows:

Electronic Submissions

    Submit electronic comments in the following way:

     Federal eRulemaking Portal: https://www.regulations.gov.
Follow the instructions for submitting comments. Comments submitted
electronically, including attachments, to https://www.regulations.gov
will be posted to the docket unchanged. Because your comment will be
made public, you are solely responsible for ensuring that your comment
does not include any confidential information that you or a third party
may not wish to be posted, such as medical information, your or anyone
else's Social Security number, or confidential business information,
such as a manufacturing process. Please note that if you include your
name, contact information, or other information that identifies you in
the body of your comments, that information will be posted on https://www.regulations.gov.
     If you want to submit a comment with confidential
information that you do not wish to be made available to the public,
submit the comment as a written/paper submission and in the manner
detailed (see ``Written/Paper Submissions'' and ``Instructions'').

Written/Paper Submissions

    Submit written/paper submissions as follows:
     Mail/Hand delivery/Courier (for written/paper
submissions): Dockets Management Staff (HFA-305), Food and Drug
Administration, 5630 Fishers Lane, Rm. 1061, Rockville, MD 20852.
     For written/paper comments submitted to the Dockets
Management Staff, FDA will post your comment, as well as any
attachments, except for information submitted, marked and identified,
as confidential, if submitted as detailed in ``Instructions.''
    Instructions: All submissions received must include the Docket No.
FDA-2019-D-0065 for ``Competitive Generic Therapies.'' Received
comments will be placed in the docket and, except for those submitted
as ``Confidential Submissions,'' publicly viewable at https://www.regulations.gov or at the Dockets Management Staff between 9 a.m.
and 4 p.m., Monday through Friday.
     Confidential Submissions--To submit a comment with
confidential information that you do not wish to be made publicly
available, submit your comments only as a written/paper submission. You
should submit two copies total. One copy will include the information
you claim to be confidential with a heading or cover note that states
``THIS DOCUMENT CONTAINS CONFIDENTIAL INFORMATION.'' The Agency will
review this copy, including the claimed confidential information, in
its consideration of comments. The second copy, which will have the
claimed confidential information redacted/blacked out, will be
available for public viewing and posted on https://www.regulations.gov.
Submit both copies to the Dockets Management Staff. If you do not wish
your name and contact information to be made publicly available, you
can provide this information on the cover sheet and not in the body of
your comments and you must identify this information as
``confidential.'' Any information marked as ``confidential'' will not
be disclosed except in accordance with 21 CFR 10.20 and other
applicable disclosure law. For more information about FDA's posting of
comments to public dockets, see 80 FR 56469, September 18, 2015, or
access the information at: https://www.gpo.gov/fdsys/pkg/FR-2015-09-18/pdf/2015-23389.pdf.
    Docket: For access to the docket to read background documents or
the electronic and written/paper comments received, go to https://www.regulations.gov and insert the docket number, found in brackets in
the heading of this document, into the ``Search'' box and follow the
prompts and/or go to the Dockets Management Staff, 5630 Fishers Lane,
Rm. 1061, Rockville, MD 20852.
    You may submit comments on any guidance at any time (see 21 CFR
10.115(g)(5)).
    Submit written requests for single copies of the draft guidance to
the Division of Drug Information, Center for Drug Evaluation and
Research, Food and Drug Administration, 10001 New Hampshire Ave.,
Hillandale Building, 4th Floor, Silver Spring, MD 20993-0002. Send one
self-addressed adhesive label to assist that office in processing your
requests. See the SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION section for electronic
access to the draft guidance document.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Susan Levine, Center for Drug
Evaluation and Research, Food and Drug Administration, 10903 New
Hampshire Ave., Bldg. 75, Rm. 1674, Silver Spring, MD 20993-0002, 240-
402-7936.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

I. Background

    FDA is announcing the availability of a draft guidance for industry
entitled ``Competitive Generic Therapies.'' On August 18, 2017, FDARA
(Pub. L. 115-52) was signed into law. As part of FDARA, the Generic
Drug User Fee Amendments were reauthorized (Title III) to continue
timely access to high-quality affordable generic medicines. FDARA also
created other enhancements associated with generic drugs. Specifically,
section 803 of FDARA amended the FD&C Act to add section 506H (21
U.S.C. 356h), which established a new process to designate, and
expedite the development and review of, certain drugs intended for
submission or submitted in an ANDA and for which there is ``inadequate
generic competition.''
    FDA recognizes that various factors may influence a generic drug
applicant's decision to develop a certain drug. For instance, some
drugs may not attract a high level of interest from generic drug
applicants if there is a limited market for the products and/or if the
products are more difficult to develop. Nevertheless, these drugs can
play an important role in diagnosing, treating, and preventing various
types of diseases or conditions, and incentivizing generic competition
for these products can help ensure patients have access to the
medicines they need. The provisions associated with CGTs are intended
to incentivize effective development, efficient review, and timely
market entry for drugs for which there is inadequate generic
competition.
    This guidance provides a description of the process that applicants
should follow to request designation of a drug as a CGT and the
criteria for designating a drug as a CGT. This guidance also includes
information on the actions FDA may take to expedite the development and
review of ANDAs for drugs designated as CGT. These actions may help to
clarify the regulatory expectations for a particular drug, assist
applicants in developing a more complete submission, and ultimately
promote a more efficient and effective ANDA review process and help
reduce the number of review cycles necessary to obtain ANDA approval.
    This guidance also provides information on how FDA implements the
statutory provisions providing for a 180-day exclusivity period for
certain first approved applicants that submit ANDAs for CGTs. FDARA
created a new type of 180-day exclusivity, different from 180-day
patent challenge exclusivity, for the first approved applicant of a
drug with a CGT designation for which there were no unexpired patents
or exclusivities listed in the Orange Book at the time of original
submission of the ANDA. This new 180-exclusivity under FDARA (``CGT
exclusivity'') is intended to incentivize competition for drugs that
are not protected by patent or exclusivity and for which there is
inadequate generic competition.
    This draft guidance is being issued consistent with FDA's good
guidance

practices regulation (21 CFR 10.115). The draft guidance, when
finalized, will represent the current thinking of FDA on ``Competitive
Generic Therapies.'' It does not establish any rights for any person
and is not binding on FDA or the public. You can use an alternative
approach if it satisfies the requirements of the applicable statutes
and regulations. This guidance is not subject to Executive Order 12866.

II. Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995

    This draft guidance refers to previously approved collections of
information that are subject to review by the Office of Management and
Budget (OMB) under the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 (44 U.S.C. 3501-
3520). The collections of information in 21 CFR 314.94, including the
submission of ANDAs and designations such as CGT product development,
have been approved under OMB control number 0910-0001 (including 0910-
0338 for Form FDA 356h). The collections of information associated with
product development meetings, presubmission meetings, and mid-review
cycle meetings between applicants and FDA have been approved under OMB
control number 0910-0797.

III. Electronic Access

    Persons with access to the internet may obtain the draft guidance
at either https://www.fda.gov/Drugs/GuidanceComplianceRegulatoryInformation/Guidances/default.htm or
https://www.regulations.gov.

    Dated: February 12, 2019.
Lowell J. Schiller,
Acting Associate Commissioner for Policy.
[FR Doc. 2019-02598 Filed 2-15-19; 8:45 am]
 BILLING CODE 4164-01-P


[Federal Register Volume 85, Number 55 (Friday, March 20, 2020)]
[Notices]
[Pages 16115-16116]
[FR Doc No: 2020-05940]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY

Federal Emergency Management Agency

[Docket ID: FEMA-2019-0028; OMB No. 1660-0080]

Agency Information Collection Activities: Submission for OMB
Review; Comment Request; Application for Surplus Federal Real Property
Public Benefit Conveyance and BRAC Program for Emergency Management Use

AGENCY: Federal Emergency Management Agency, DHS.

ACTION: Notice and request for comments.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA) will submit the
information collection abstracted below to the Office of Management and
Budget for review and clearance in accordance with the requirements of
the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995. The submission will describe the
nature of the information collection, the categories of respondents,
the estimated burden (i.e., the time, effort and resources used by
respondents to respond) and cost, and the actual data collection
instruments FEMA will use.

DATES: Comments must be submitted on or before April 20, 2020.

ADDRESSES: Submit written comments on the proposed information
collection to the Office of Information and Regulatory Affairs, Office
of Management and Budget. Comments should be addressed to the Desk
Officer for the Department of Homeland Security, Federal Emergency
Management Agency, and sent via electronic mail to
<EMAIL_ADDRESS>
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Requests for additional information or
copies of the information collection should be made to Director,
Information Management Division, 500 C Street SW, Washington, DC 20472,
email address<EMAIL_ADDRESS>or
Anna Page Campbell, Realty Specialist, FEMA, Installations &
Infrastructure Division,<PHONE_NUMBER>,
<EMAIL_ADDRESS>
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: This proposed information collection
previously published in the Federal Register on December 19, 2019, at
84 FR 69758 with a 60 day public comment period. No comments were
received. The purpose of this notice is to notify

the public that FEMA will submit the information collection abstracted
below to the Office of Management and Budget for review and clearance.

Collection of Information

    Title: Application for Surplus Federal Real Property Public Benefit
Conveyance and BRAC Program for Emergency Management Use.
    Type of Information Collection: Extension, with changes, of a
currently approved information collection.
    OMB Number: 1660-0080.
    FEMA Forms: FEMA Form 119-0-1, Surplus Federal Real Property
Application for Public Benefit Conveyance.
    Abstract: Use of the Application for Surplus Federal Real Property
Public Benefit Conveyance and Base Realignment and Closure (BRAC)
Program for Emergency Management Use is necessary to implement the
processes and procedures for the successful, lawful, and expeditious
conveyance of real property from the Federal Government to public
entities such as State, local, county, city, town, or other like
government bodies, as it relates to emergency management response
purposes, including fire and rescue services. Utilization of this
application will ensure that properties will be fully positioned for
use at their highest and best potentials as required by GSA and
Department of Defense regulations, public law, Executive Orders, and
the Code of Federal Regulations.
    Affected Public: State, local, or Tribal Government.
    Estimated Number of Respondents: 15.
    Estimated Number of Responses: 15.
    Estimated Total Annual Burden Hours: 75.
    Estimated Total Annual Respondent Cost: $4,868.
    Estimated Respondents' Operation and Maintenance Costs: $0.
    Estimated Respondents' Capital and Start-Up Costs: $0.
    Estimated Total Annual Cost to the Federal Government: $2,979.

Comments

    Comments may be submitted as indicated in the ADDRESSES caption
above. Comments are solicited to (a) evaluate whether the proposed data
collection is necessary for the proper performance of the agency,
including whether the information shall have practical utility; (b)
evaluate the accuracy of the agency's estimate of the burden of the
proposed collection of information, including the validity of the
methodology and assumptions used; (c) enhance the quality, utility, and
clarity of the information to be collected; and (d) minimize the burden
of the collection of information on those who are to respond, including
through the use of appropriate automated, electronic, mechanical, or
other technological collection techniques or other forms of information
technology, e.g., permitting electronic submission of responses.

Maile Arthur,
Acting Records Management Branch Chief, Office of the Chief
Administrative Officer, Mission Support, Federal Emergency Management
Agency, Department of Homeland Security.
[FR Doc. 2020-05940 Filed 3-19-20; 8:45 am]
 BILLING CODE 9111-19-P


[Federal Register Volume 75, Number 141 (Friday, July 23, 2010)]
[Notices]
[Pages 43208-43209]
[FR Doc No: 2010-18072]

=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

[Rule 17f-1(g); SEC File No. 270-30; OMB Control No. 3235-0290]

Proposed Collection; Comment Request

Upon Written Request, Copies Available From: Securities and Exchange
Commission, Office of Investor Education and Advocacy, Washington, DC
20549-0213.

Extension:
    Rule 17f-1(g), SEC File No. 270-30, OMB Control No. 3235-0290.

    Notice is hereby given that pursuant to the Paperwork Reduction Act
of 1995 (44 U.S.C. 3501 et seq.), the Securities and Exchange
Commission (``Commission'') is soliciting comments on the existing
collection provided for in Rule 17f-1(g) (17 CFR 240.17f-1(g)), under
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78a et seq.). The
Commission plans to submit this existing collection of information to
the Office of Management and Budget for extension and approval.
    Paragraph (g) of Rule 17f-1 requires that all reporting
institutions (i.e., every national securities exchange, member thereof,
registered securities association, broker, dealer, municipal securities
dealer, registered transfer agent, registered clearing agency,
participant therein, member of the Federal Reserve System and bank
insured by the FDIC) maintain and preserve a number of documents
related to their participation in the Lost and Stolen Securities
Program (``Program'') under Rule 17f-1. The following documents must be
kept in an easily accessible place for three years, according to
paragraph (g): (1) Copies or all reports of theft or loss (Form X-17F-
1A) filed with the Commission's designee; (2) all agreements between
reporting institutions regarding registration in the Program or other
aspects of Rule 17f-1; and (3) all confirmations or other information
received from the Commission or its designee as a result of inquiry.
    Reporting institutions utilize these records and reports (a) to
report missing, lost, stolen or counterfeit securities to the database,
(b) to confirm inquiry of the database, and (c) to demonstrate
compliance with Rule 17f-1. The Commission and the reporting
institutions' examining authorities utilize these records to monitor
the incidence of thefts and losses incurred by reporting institutions
and to determine compliance with Rule 17f-1. If such records were not
retained by

reporting institutions, compliance with Rule 17f-1 could not be
monitored effectively.
    The Commission estimates that there are 25,458 reporting
institutions (respondents) and, on average, each respondent would need
to retain 33 records annually, with each retention requiring
approximately 1 minute (33 minutes or .55 hours). The total estimated
annual burden is 14,001.9 hours (25,458 x .55 hours = 14,001.9).
Assuming an average hourly cost for clerical work of $50.00, the
average total yearly record retention cost for each respondent would be
$27.50 ($50 x .55 hours). Based on these estimates, the total annual
cost for the estimated 25,458 reporting institutions would be
approximately $700,095 (25,458 x $27.50).
    Written comments are invited on: (a) Whether the proposed
collection of information is necessary for the proper performance of
the functions of the Commission, including whether the information
shall have practical utility; (b) the accuracy of the Commission's
estimates of the burden of the proposed collection of information; (c)
ways to enhance the quality, utility, and clarity of the information to
be collected; and (d) ways to minimize the burden of the collection of
information on respondents, including through the use of automated
collection techniques or other forms of information technology.
Consideration will be given to comments and suggestions submitted in
writing within 60 days of this publication.
    Please direct your written comments to: Charles Boucher, Director/
Chief Information Officer, Securities and Exchange Commission, c/o
Shirley Martinson, 6432 General Green Way, Alexandria, Virginia 22312
or send an e-mail to<EMAIL_ADDRESS>
    Dated: July 19, 2010.
Florence E. Harmon,
Deputy Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2010-18072 Filed 7-22-10; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 8010-01-P


[Federal Register: October 29, 2007 (Volume 72, Number 208)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Page 61058-61059]
[DOCID:fr29oc07-7]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY

Coast Guard

33 CFR Part 117

[Docket No. CGD11-07-014]

Drawbridge Operation Regulations; Sacramento River, Rio Vista, CA

AGENCY: Coast Guard, DHS.

ACTION: Notice of temporary deviation from regulations.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Commander, Eleventh Coast Guard District, has issued a
temporary deviation from the regulation governing the operation of the
Rio Vista Drawbridge across the Sacramento River, mile 12.8, at Rio
Vista, CA. The deviation is necessary to allow the

bridge owner, the California Department of Transportation (Caltrans),
to conduct required maintenance of the drawspan. This deviation allows
for a 4-hour notice for openings during nighttime.

DATES: This deviation is effective between 9 p.m. and 5 a.m., from
October 22, 2007 through December 19, 2007.

ADDRESSES: Materials referred to in this document are available for
inspection or copying at Commander (dpw), Eleventh Coast Guard
District, Building 50-2, Coast Guard Island, Alameda, CA 94501-5100,
between 8 a.m. and 4 p.m., Monday through Friday, except Federal
holidays. The telephone number is<PHONE_NUMBER>. The Eleventh Coast
Guard District maintains the public docket for this temporary
deviation.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: David H. Sulouff, Chief, Bridge
Section, Eleventh Coast Guard District, telephone<PHONE_NUMBER>.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Caltrans requested a temporary change to the
operation of the Rio Vista Drawbridge, mile 12.8, Sacramento River, at
Rio Vista, CA. The Rio Vista Drawbridge navigation span provides a
vertical clearance of 17 feet above Mean High Water in the closed-to-
navigation position. The draw opens on signal as required by 33 CFR
117.5. Navigation on the waterway consists of both commercial and
recreational vessels.
    The 4-hour notice for openings during the maintenance period,
between 9 p.m. and 5 a.m., from October 22, 2007 through December 19,
2007, will allow Caltrans to clear the drawspan of maintenance
equipment so as not to delay approaching vessels. This temporary
deviation has been coordinated with all affected waterway users. No
objections to the proposed temporary deviation were raised.
    Vessels that can transit the bridge, while in the closed-to-
navigation position, may continue to do so at any time.
    In accordance with 33 CFR 117.35(e), the drawbridge must return to
its regular operating schedule immediately at the end of the designated
time period. This deviation from the operating regulations is
authorized under 33 CFR 117.35.

    Dated: October 19, 2007.
J.E. Long,
Captain, U.S. Coast Guard, Acting Commander, Eleventh Coast Guard
District.
 [FR Doc. E7-21239 Filed 10-26-07; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4910-15-P


[Federal Register Volume 82, Number 221 (Friday, November 17, 2017)]
[Proposed Rules]
[Pages 54307-54309]
[FR Doc No: 2017-25015]

=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY

40 CFR Part 52

[EPA-R09-OAR-2017-0573; FRL-9970-86-Region 9]

Approval of California Air Plan Revisions, Mojave Desert Air
Quality Management District

AGENCY: Environmental Protection Agency (EPA).

ACTION: Proposed rule.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) is proposing to
approve a revision to the Mojave Desert Air Quality Management District
(MDAQMD) portion of the California State Implementation Plan (SIP).
This revision concerns emissions of volatile organic compounds (VOCs)
from marine

and pleasure craft coating operations. We are proposing to approve a
local rule to regulate these emission sources under the Clean Air Act
(CAA or the Act). We are taking comments on this proposal and plan to
follow with a final action.

DATES: Any comments must arrive by December 18, 2017.

ADDRESSES: Submit your comments, identified by Docket ID No. EPA-R09-
OAR-2017-0573 at http://www.regulations.gov, or via email to Arnold
Lazarus, Rulemaking Office at [email protected]. For comments
submitted at Regulations.gov, follow the online instructions for
submitting comments. Once submitted, comments cannot be removed or
edited from Regulations.gov. For either manner of submission, the EPA
may publish any comment received to its public docket. Do not submit
electronically any information you consider to be Confidential Business
Information (CBI) or other information whose disclosure is restricted
by statute. Multimedia submissions (audio, video, etc.) must be
accompanied by a written comment. The written comment is considered the
official comment and should include discussion of all points you wish
to make. The EPA will generally not consider comments or comment
contents located outside of the primary submission (i.e. on the Web,
cloud, or other file sharing system). For additional submission
methods, please contact the person identified in the FOR FURTHER
INFORMATION CONTACT section. For the full EPA public comment policy,
information about CBI or multimedia submissions, and general guidance
on making effective comments, please visit http://www2.epa.gov/dockets/commenting-epa-dockets.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Arnold Lazarus, EPA Region IX, (415)
972-3024, [email protected].

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Throughout this document, ``we,'' ``us'' and
``our'' refer to the EPA.

Table of Contents

I. The State's Submittal
    A. What rule did the State submit?
    B. Are there other versions of this rule?
    C. What is the purpose of the submitted rule revision?
II. The EPA's Evaluation and Action
    A. How is the EPA evaluating the rule?
    B. Does the rule meet the evaluation criteria?
    C. EPA Recommendations To Further Improve the Rule
    D. Public Comment and Proposed Action
III. Incorporation by reference
IV. Statutory and Executive Order Reviews

I. The State's Submittal

A. What rule did the State submit?

    Table 1 lists the rule addressed by this proposal with the date
that it was adopted by the local air agency and submitted by the
California Air Resources Board (CARB).

                                             Table 1--Submitted Rule
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
            Local agency                 Rule #               Rule title              Amended        Submitted
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
MDAQMD.............................            1106  Marine and Pleasure Craft        10/24/2016      02/24/2017
                                                      Coating Operations.
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

    On August 2, 2017, the EPA determined that the submittal for MDAQMD
Rule 1106 met the completeness criteria in 40 CFR part 51 Appendix V,
which must be met before formal EPA review.

B. Are there other versions of this rule?

    We approved an earlier version of Rule 1106 into the SIP on July
16, 2008 (73 FR 40754). The MDAQMD adopted revisions to the SIP-
approved version on October 24, 2016 and CARB submitted them to us on
February 24, 2017.

C. What is the purpose of the submitted rule revision?

    VOCs help produce ground-level ozone, smog and particulate matter,
which harm human health and the environment. Section 110(a) of the CAA
requires states to submit regulations that control VOC emissions. Rule
1106 was revised primarily to implement reasonably available control
technology (RACT) recommendations to strengthen the overall VOC capture
and control efficiency from 85 to 90%, and to generally adopt more
stringent VOC content limits for marine and pleasure craft coatings.
The EPA's technical support document (TSD) has more information about
this rule.

II. The EPA's Evaluation and Action

A. How is the EPA evaluating the rule?

    SIP rules must be enforceable (see CAA section 110(a)(2)), must not
interfere with applicable requirements concerning attainment and
reasonable further progress or other CAA requirements (see CAA section
110(l)), and must not modify certain SIP control requirements in
nonattainment areas without ensuring equivalent or greater emissions
reductions (see CAA section 193).
    Generally, SIP rules must require RACT for each category of sources
covered by a Control Techniques Guidelines (CTG) document as well as
each major source of VOCs in ozone nonattainment areas classified as
moderate or above (see CAA section 182(b)(2)). The MDAQMD regulates an
ozone nonattainment area classified as Severe for the 1997 and the 2008
8-Hour Ozone National Ambient Air Quality Standards (40 CFR 81.305). In
addition, Rule 1106 regulates activities covered by two different CTGs:
Control Techniques Guidelines for Shipbuilding and Ship Repair
Operations (61 FR 44050), August 1996, and Control Techniques
Guidelines for Miscellaneous Metal and Plastic Parts Coatings EPA-453/
R-08-003, September 2008. Therefore, this rule must implement RACT.
    Guidance and policy documents that we use to evaluate
enforceability, revision/relaxation and rule stringency requirements
for the applicable criteria pollutants include the following:

    1. ``State Implementation Plans; General Preamble for the
Implementation of Title I of the Clean Air Act Amendments of 1990,''
57 FR 13498 (April 16, 1992); 57 FR 18070 (April 28, 1992).
    2. ``Issues Relating to VOC Regulation Cutpoints, Deficiencies,
and Deviations,'' EPA, May 25, 1988 (the Bluebook, revised January
11, 1990).
    3. ``Guidance Document for Correcting Common VOC & Other Rule
Deficiencies,'' EPA Region 9, August 21, 2001 (the Little Bluebook).
    4. ``Control Techniques Guidelines for Shipbuilding and Ship
Repair Operations'' (61 FR 44050), August 27, 1996.
    5. ``Alternative Control Techniques Document: Surface Coating
Operations at Shipbuilding and Ship Repair Facilities EPA 453/R-94-
032, April 1994.
    6. ``Control Techniques Guidelines for Miscellaneous Metal and
Plastic Parts Coatings'' EPA-453/R-08-003, September 2008.

B. Does the rule meet the evaluation criteria?

    Rule 1106 adds several new marine and pleasure craft specialty
coating

categories, lowers the VOC content limit of other specialty coating
categories, and lowers the VOC content limit for solvents used for
surface preparation. Under the District's October 23, 2006 SIP-approved
rule, some of these new specialty coating categories such as Topcoats,
Pleasure Craft, One Component, and Two Component, would have been
covered under the ``General Use'' category and been subject to a more
stringent VOC limit when compared to the October 24, 2016 amended rule.
The EPA reviewed the potential gross emissions increase associated with
the new specialty coating limits and estimates that total VOC emissions
associated with these coatings may increase by approximately 250 pounds
per year or approximately 0.001% of MDAQMD's VOC inventory. We conclude
that this is a negligible increase and would not impact attainment.
Because the potential gross increase is minimal, we have not calculated
the net impact of the rule revisions, including the emission reductions
from strengthened limits. Our evaluation shows this rule is consistent
with CAA requirements and relevant guidance regarding enforceability,
RACT, and SIP revisions. The TSD has more information on our
evaluation.

C. EPA Recommendations To Further Improve the Rule

    The TSD describes additional rule revisions that we recommend for
the next time the local agency modifies the rule.

D. Public Comment and Proposed Action

    As authorized in section 110(k)(3) of the Act, the EPA proposes to
fully approve the submitted rule because we believe it fulfills all
relevant requirements. We will accept comments from the public on this
proposal until December 18, 2017. If we take final action to approve
the submitted rule our final action will incorporate this rule into the
federally enforceable SIP.

III. Incorporation by Reference

    In this rule, the EPA is proposing to include in a final EPA rule
regulatory text that includes incorporation by reference. In accordance
with requirements of 1 CFR 51.5, the EPA is proposing to incorporate by
reference the MDAQMD rule described in Table 1 of this preamble. The
EPA has made, and will continue to make, these materials available
through www.regulations.gov and at the EPA Region IX Office (please
contact the person identified in the FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT
section of this preamble for more information).

IV. Statutory and Executive Order Reviews

    Under the Clean Air Act, the Administrator is required to approve a
SIP submission that complies with the provisions of the Act and
applicable federal regulations. 42 U.S.C. 7410(k); 40 CFR 52.02(a).
Thus, in reviewing SIP submissions, the EPA's role is to approve state
choices, provided that they meet the criteria of the Clean Air Act.
Accordingly, this proposed action merely proposes to approve state law
as meeting federal requirements and does not impose additional
requirements beyond those imposed by state law. For that reason, this
proposed action:
     Is not a ``significant regulatory action'' subject to
review by the Office of Management and Budget under Executive Orders
12866 (58 FR 51735, October 4, 1993) and 13563 (76 FR 3821, January 21,
2011);
     does not impose an information collection burden under the
provisions of the Paperwork Reduction Act (44 U.S.C. 3501 et seq.);
     is certified as not having a significant economic impact
on a substantial number of small entities under the Regulatory
Flexibility Act (5 U.S.C. 601 et seq.);
     does not contain any unfunded mandate or significantly or
uniquely affect small governments, as described in the Unfunded
Mandates Reform Act of 1995 (Public Law 104-4);
     does not have Federalism implications as specified in
Executive Order 13132 (64 FR 43255, August 10, 1999);
     is not an economically significant regulatory action based
on health or safety risks subject to Executive Order 13045 (62 FR
19885, April 23, 1997);
     is not a significant regulatory action subject to
Executive Order 13211 (66 FR 28355, May 22, 2001);
     is not subject to requirements of Section 12(d) of the
National Technology Transfer and Advancement Act of 1995 (15 U.S.C. 272
note) because application of those requirements would be inconsistent
with the Clean Air Act; and
     does not provide the EPA with the discretionary authority
to address disproportionate human health or environmental effects with
practical, appropriate, and legally permissible methods under Executive
Order 12898 (59 FR 7629, February 16, 1994).

In addition, the SIP is not approved to apply on any Indian reservation
land or in any other area where the EPA or an Indian tribe has
demonstrated that a tribe has jurisdiction. In those areas of Indian
country, the rule does not have tribal implications and will not impose
substantial direct costs on tribal governments or preempt tribal law as
specified by Executive Order 13175 (65 FR 67249, November 9, 2000).

List of Subjects in 40 CFR Part 52

    Environmental protection, Air pollution control, Incorporation by
reference Intergovernmental relations, Ozone, Reporting and
recordkeeping requirements, Volatile organic compounds.

    Authority:  42 U.S.C. 7401 et seq.

    Dated: November 6, 2017.
Alexis Strauss,
Acting Regional Administrator, Region IX.
[FR Doc. 2017-25015 Filed 11-16-17; 8:45 am]
 BILLING CODE 6560-50-P


[Federal Register: June 27, 2007 (Volume 72, Number 123)]
[Notices]
[Page 35276-35278]
[DOCID:fr27jn07-103]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

[Release No. 34-55936; File No. SR-ISE-2007-32]

Self-Regulatory Organizations; International Securities Exchange,
LLC; Notice of Filing of Proposed Rule Change and Amendment No. 1
Thereto Relating To Removing Certain Rules From Its Rulebook

June 21, 2007.
    Pursuant to Section 19(b)(1) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934
(``Act'') \1\ and Rule 19b-4 thereunder,\2\ notice is hereby given that
on May 9, 2007, the International Securities Exchange, LLC (the
``Exchange'' or the ``ISE'') filed with the Securities and Exchange
Commission (``Commission'') the proposed rule change as described in
Items I, II, and III below, which Items have been substantially
prepared by the Exchange. On June 8, 2007, ISE filed Amendment No. 1 to
the proposed rule change.\3\ The Commission is publishing this notice
to solicit comments on the proposed rule change, as amended, from
interested persons.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \1\ 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(1).
    \2\ 17 CFR 240.19b-4.
    \3\ Amendment No. 1 is incorporated in this notice.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

I. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement of the Terms of Substance
of the Proposed Rule Change

    The Exchange proposes to remove certain inconsequential ISE rules
for which there is no corresponding National Association of Securities
Dealers (``NASD'') rule. The text of the proposed rule change is below.
Proposed new language is in italics; proposed deletions are enclosed in
brackets.
* * * * *
Rule 403. Reserved.[Nominal Employment
    No Member may employ any person in a nominal position on account of
business obtained by such person.]
Rule 605. Reserved.[Other Affiliations of Registered Persons
    Except with the express written permission of the Exchange, every
registered person shall devote his entire time during business hours to
the business of the Member employing him, or to the business of its
affiliates that are engaged in the transaction of business as a broker
or dealer in securities or commodities or in such other businesses as
have been approved by the Member's designated examining authority.]

Rule 615. Reserved.[Addressing of Communications to Customers
    No Member shall address any communications to a customer in care of
any other person unless either (i) the customer, within the preceding
twelve (12) months, has instructed the Member in writing to send
communications in care of such other persons, or (ii) duplicate copies
are sent to the customer at some other address designated in writing by
him.]
* * * * *

II. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement of the Purpose of, and
Statutory Basis for, the Proposed Rule Change

    In its filing with the Commission, the Exchange included statements
concerning the purpose of and basis for the proposed rule change and
discussed any comments it received on the proposed rule change. The
text of these statements may be examined at the places specified in
Item IV below. The Exchange has prepared summaries, set forth in
Sections A, B, and C below, of the most significant aspects of such
statements.

A. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement of the Purpose of, and
Statutory Basis for, the Proposed Rule Change

1. Purpose
    The Exchange is proposing to rescind certain inconsequential ISE
rules. The Exchange has recently entered into an amended and restated
17d-2 Agreement with the National Association of Securities Dealers
(``NASD''), whereby the NASD has assumed regulatory and enforcement
responsibilities for dual members with respect to common rules
delineated in the Agreement.\4\ During the course of amending this
Agreement, the Exchange came across some common rules that the ISE
needed to amend in order to conform the language to the corresponding
NASD rule \5\ and a few rules which are not common to the NASD rules
and are not specific to or necessary for the Exchange's marketplace or
membership. Accordingly, the Exchange proposes to remove the following
rules from its rulebook: Rule 403 (Nominal Employment), Rule 605 (Other
Affiliations of Registered Persons), and 615 (Addressing of
Communications to Customers).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \4\ See Securities Exchange Act Release No. 55367 (February 27,
2007), 72 FR 9983 (March 6, 2007) (Order approving and declaring
effective a plan for the allocation of regulatory responsibilities
between ISE and NASD).
    \5\ See Securities Exchange Act Release No. 55751 (May 11,
2007), 72 FR 27884 (May 17, 2007) (Proposal to amend ISE rules to
conform such rules to their corresponding NASD rules).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    The Exchange seeks to rescind Rule 403 (Nominal Employment) because
the rule is narrowly drafted to prohibit members from obtaining
business by employing a person in a nominal position. The Exchange
believes that Rule 406 (Gratuities) better addresses this issue by
prohibiting a member from giving any compensation or gratuities in any
one year in excess of $100 to any employee of any other member or of
any non-member broker, dealer, bank or institution, without the prior
consent of the employer and of the Exchange.
    Additionally, the Exchange seeks to rescind Rule 605 (Other
Affiliations of Registered Persons) because the Exchange believes it is
an antiquated rule and due to significant changes in market structure,
the Exchange no longer believes it necessary to limit registered
persons activities during business hours. Further, the NASD has no
comparable rule and, as discussed above, the Exchange has entered into
a 17d-2 Agreement with the NASD to monitor and enforce common rules,
including, but not limited to, rules governing Registered Persons.
    Lastly, the Exchange seeks to rescind Rule 615 (Addressing of
Communications to Customers) because the Exchange believes that broker-
dealers that do a public business are better equipped to set their own
policies and procedures governing communications with customers that
are applicable to their business. Pursuant to ISE Rule 2114 (Doing
Business with the Public) ISE members that do business with the public
are required to also be a member of the NASD. The NASD requires broker-
dealers to have written supervisory procedures covering areas such as,
communications with the public and customer account statements.
Additionally, those members must also comply with NASD rules, which the
Exchange believes sufficiently address this topic.
2. Statutory Basis
    The basis under the Exchange Act for this proposed rule change is
found in Section 6(b)(5).\6\ Specifically, the Exchange believes the
proposed rule change is consistent with Section 6(b)(5) requirements
that the rules of an exchange be designed to promote just and equitable
principles of trade, serve to remove impediments to and perfect the
mechanism for a free and open market and a national market system, and,
in general, to protect investors and the public interest.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \6\ 15 U.S.C. Sec.  78f(b).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

B. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement on Burden on Competition

    The proposed rule change does not impose any burden on competition
that is not necessary or appropriate in furtherance of the purposes of
the Act.

C. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement on Comments on the Proposed
Rule Change Received From Members, Participants, or Others

    The Exchange has not solicited, and does not intend to solicit,
comments on this proposed rule change. The Exchange has not received
any unsolicited written comments from members or other interested
parties.

III. Date of Effectiveness of the Proposed Rule Change and Timing for
Commission Action

    Within 35 days of the date of publication of this notice in the
Federal Register or within such longer period (i) as the Commission may
designate up to 90 days of such date if it finds such longer period to
be appropriate and publishes its reasons for so finding or (ii) as to
which the Exchange consents, the Commission will:
    (A) By order approve such proposed rule change, as amended, or
    (B) Institute proceedings to determine whether the proposed rule
change, as amended, should be disapproved.

IV. Solicitation of Comments

    Interested persons are invited to submit written data, views and
arguments concerning the foregoing, including whether the proposed rule
change, as amended, is consistent with the Act. Comments may be
submitted by any of the following methods:

Electronic Comments

     Use the Commission's Internet comment form (http://www.sec.gov/rules/sro.shtml.
); or     Send an e-mail to<EMAIL_ADDRESS>Please include

File Number SR-ISE-2007-32 on the subject line.

Paper Comments

     Send paper comments in triplicate to Nancy M. Morris,
Secretary, Securities and Exchange Commission, 100 F Street, NE.,
Washington, DC 20549-1090.

All submissions should refer to File Number SR-ISE-2007-32. This file
number should be included in the subject line if e-mail is used. To
help the Commission process and review your comments more efficiently,
please use

only one method. The Commission will post all comments on the
Commission's Internet Web site (http://www.sec.gov/rules/sro.shtml).

Copies of the submission, all subsequent amendments, all written
statements with respect to the proposed rule change that are filed with
the Commission, and all written communications relating to the proposed
rule change between the Commission and any person, other than those
that may be withheld from the public in accordance with the provisions
of 5 U.S.C. 552, will be available for inspection and copying in the
Commission's Public Reference Room, 100 F Street, NE, Washington, DC
20549, on official business days between the hours of 10 a.m. and 3
p.m. Copies of such filing also will be available for inspection and
copying at the principal office of the Exchange. All comments received
will be posted without change; the Commission does not edit personal
identifying information from submissions. You should submit only
information that you wish to make available publicly. All submissions
should refer to the File Number SR-ISE-2007-32 and should be submitted
on or before July 18, 2007.

    For the Commission, by the Division of Market Regulation,
pursuant to delegated authority.\7\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \7\ 17 CFR 200.30-3(a)(12).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

Florence E. Harmon,
Deputy Secretary.
 [FR Doc. E7-12390 Filed 6-26-07; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 8010-01-P


[Federal Register Volume 88, Number 108 (Tuesday, June 6, 2023)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Pages 36962-36964]
[FR Doc No: 2023-11893]

=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY

40 CFR Part 52

[EPA-R05-OAR-2022-0581; FRL-10168-02-R5]

Air Plan Approval; Wisconsin; VOC RACT for Miscellaneous
Industrial Adhesives and Miscellaneous Metal and Plastic Parts Coatings

AGENCY: Environmental Protection Agency (EPA).

ACTION: Final rule.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) is approving State
Implementation Plan (SIP) revisions related to volatile organic
compound (VOC) reasonably available control technology (RACT),
submitted by the Wisconsin Department of Natural Resources
(``Wisconsin'' or ``WDNR'') on June 28, 2022. The SIP revisions consist
of several additions, corrections, and clarifications to the Wisconsin
Administrative Code (WAC) NR 400 series and update the VOC RACT
requirements for the Miscellaneous Industrial Adhesives and
Miscellaneous Metal and Plastic Parts Coatings Control Techniques
Guidelines (CTG) source categories. Also, EPA is approving Wisconsin's
August 10, 2022, request to remove three previously approved
Administrative Orders from the SIP. The request to remove these
Administrative Orders includes a Clean Air Act (CAA) Section 110(l)
demonstration highlighting that the revisions to Wisconsin's rules do
not interfere with any applicable requirement concerning attainment or
any other applicable requirement of the CAA because this SIP revision
is a direct replacement for the previously approved orders. These SIP
revisions apply to nonattainment areas in Wisconsin classified as
moderate or above under the 2008 or later ozone National Ambient Air
Quality Standards (``NAAQS'' or ``standard''). These revisions are
consistent with the CTG documents issued by EPA in 2008 and are
approvable because they serve as SIP strengthening measures. EPA
proposed to approve this action on January 30, 2023, and received no
adverse comments.

DATES: This final rule is effective on July 6, 2023.

ADDRESSES: EPA has established a docket for this action under Docket ID
No. EPA-R05-OAR-2022-0581. All documents in the docket are listed on
the www.regulations.gov website. Although listed in the index, some
information is not publicly available, i.e., Confidential Business
Information (CBI) or other information whose disclosure is restricted
by statute. Certain other material, such as copyrighted material, is
not placed on the internet and will be publicly available only in hard
copy form. Publicly available docket materials are available either
through www.regulations.gov or at the Environmental Protection Agency,
Region 5, Air and Radiation Division, 77 West Jackson Boulevard,
Chicago, Illinois 60604. This facility is open from 8:30 a.m. to 4:30
p.m., Monday through Friday, excluding Federal holidays and facility
closures due to COVID-19. We recommend that you telephone Katie Mullen,
at<PHONE_NUMBER> before visiting the Region 5 office.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Katie Mullen, Environmental Engineer,
Attainment Planning and Maintenance Section, Air Programs Branch (AR-
18J), Environmental Protection Agency, Region 5, 77 West Jackson
Boulevard, Chicago, Illinois 60604,<PHONE_NUMBER>,
[email protected].

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Throughout this document whenever ``we,''
``us,'' or ``our'' is used, we mean EPA.

I. Background Information

    On January 30, 2023, EPA proposed to approve SIP revisions that
consist of several additions, corrections, and clarifications to the
Wisconsin Administrative Code (WAC) NR 400 series and update the VOC
RACT requirements for the Miscellaneous Industrial Adhesives and
Miscellaneous Metal and Plastic Parts Coatings Control Techniques
Guidelines (CTG) source categories. Also, EPA proposed to approve
Wisconsin's August 10, 2022, request to remove three previously EPA
approved Wisconsin Administrative Orders from the SIP. An explanation
of the CAA requirements, a detailed analysis of the revisions, and
EPA's reasons for proposing approval were provided in the notice of
proposed rulemaking (88 FR 5840) and will not be restated here. The
public comment period for this proposed rule ended on March 1, 2023.
EPA received no adverse comments on the proposal. Therefore, we are
finalizing our action as proposed.

II. Final Action

    EPA is approving in the Wisconsin SIP additions, corrections, and
clarifications related to rules in WAC Chapters 400, 419, 421, 422,
423, 425, 439, and 484. Specifically we are approving NR
400.02(intro.), NR 419.02(intro.), NR 421.02(intro.), NR 422.01, NR
422.02, NR 422.03, NR 422.04, NR 422.05, NR 422.06, NR 422.08, NR
422.083, NR 422.084, NR 422.127, NR 422.128, NR 422.14, NR 422.145, NR
422.15, NR 422.151, NR 423.035(2)(a)1., NR 423.037(2)(a)1., NR
425.04(3)(a), NR 439.04(4) and (5), and NR 484.10 Table 5 Rows (9) and
(25m), as published in the Wisconsin Register, May 2022 No. 797,
effective June 1, 2022. These revisions are consistent with the
Miscellaneous Industrial Adhesives and Miscellaneous Metal and Plastic
Parts Coatings CTGs issued by EPA in 2008. These revisions are
approvable because they serve as SIP strengthening measures for
Wisconsin's VOC rules. Also, EPA is approving Wisconsin's request for
the removal of the previously approved Administrative Orders AM-20-01,
AM-20-02, and AM-20-03, submitted in a letter from WDNR on August 10,
2022. When EPA approves this action, it concurrently

removes these three Administrative Orders from the Wisconsin SIP. The
SIP revisions under Wisconsin Board Order AM-20-18 replace AM-20-01,
AM-20-02, and AM-20-03.

III. Incorporation by Reference

    In this rule, EPA is finalizing regulatory text that includes
incorporation by reference. In accordance with requirements of 1 CFR
51.5, EPA is finalizing the incorporation by reference of the Wisconsin
regulations described in sections I and II of this preamble and set
forth in the amendments to 40 CFR part 52, below. EPA has made, and
will continue to make, these documents generally available through
www.regulations.gov, and at the EPA Region 5 Office (please contact the
person identified in the FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT section of
this preamble for more information).
    Also in this document, as described in the amendments to 40 CFR
part 52 set forth below, EPA is removing provisions of the EPA-Approved
Wisconsin Regulations and Statutes from the Wisconsin State
Implementation Plan, which is incorporated by reference in accordance
with the requirements of 1 CFR part 51.

IV. Statutory and Executive Order Reviews

    Under the CAA, the Administrator is required to approve a SIP
submission that complies with the provisions of the CAA and applicable
Federal regulations. 42 U.S.C. 7410(k); 40 CFR 52.02(a). Thus, in
reviewing SIP submissions, EPA's role is to approve State choices,
provided that they meet the criteria of the CAA. Accordingly, this
action merely approves State law as meeting Federal requirements and
does not impose additional requirements beyond those imposed by State
law. For that reason, this action:
     Is not a significant regulatory action subject to review
by the Office of Management and Budget under Executive Orders 12866 (58
FR 51735, October 4, 1993) and 13563 (76 FR 3821, January 21, 2011);
     Does not impose an information collection burden under the
provisions of the Paperwork Reduction Act (44 U.S.C. 3501 et seq.);
     Is certified as not having a significant economic impact
on a substantial number of small entities under the Regulatory
Flexibility Act (5 U.S.C. 601 et seq.);
     Does not contain any unfunded mandate or significantly or
uniquely affect small governments, as described in the Unfunded
Mandates Reform Act of 1995 (Pub. L. 104-4);
     Does not have federalism implications as specified in
Executive Order 13132 (64 FR 43255, August 10, 1999);
     Is not an economically significant regulatory action based
on health or safety risks subject to Executive Order 13045 (62 FR
19885, April 23, 1997);
     Is not a significant regulatory action subject to
Executive Order 13211 (66 FR 28355, May 22, 2001); and
     Is not subject to requirements of Section 12(d) of the
National Technology Transfer and Advancement Act of 1995 (15 U.S.C. 272
note) because application of those requirements would be inconsistent
with the CAA.
    In addition, the SIP is not approved to apply on any Indian
reservation land or in any other area where EPA or an Indian Tribe has
demonstrated that a Tribe has jurisdiction. In those areas of Indian
country, the rule does not have Tribal implications and will not impose
substantial direct costs on Tribal governments or preempt Tribal law as
specified by Executive Order 13175 (65 FR 67249, November 9, 2000).
    Executive Order 12898 (Federal Actions To Address Environmental
Justice in Minority Populations and Low-Income Populations, 59 FR 7629,
Feb. 16, 1994) directs Federal agencies to identify and address
``disproportionately high and adverse human health or environmental
effects'' of their actions on minority populations and low-income
populations to the greatest extent practicable and permitted by law.
EPA defines environmental justice (EJ) as ``the fair treatment and
meaningful involvement of all people regardless of race, color,
national origin, or income with respect to the development,
implementation, and enforcement of environmental laws, regulations, and
policies.'' EPA further defines the term fair treatment to mean that
``no group of people should bear a disproportionate burden of
environmental harms and risks, including those resulting from the
negative environmental consequences of industrial, governmental, and
commercial operations or programs and policies.''
    WDNR did not evaluate environmental justice considerations as part
of its SIP submittal; the CAA and applicable implementing regulations
neither prohibit nor require such an evaluation. EPA did not perform an
EJ analysis and did not consider EJ in this action. Due to the nature
of the action being taken here, this action is expected to have a
neutral to positive impact on the air quality of the affected area.
Consideration of EJ is not required as part of this action, and there
is no information in the record inconsistent with the stated goal of
E.O. 12898 of achieving environmental justice for people of color, low-
income populations, and Indigenous peoples.
    This action is subject to the Congressional Review Act, and EPA
will submit a rule report to each House of the Congress and to the
Comptroller General of the United States. This action is not a ``major
rule'' as defined by 5 U.S.C. 804(2).
    Under section 307(b)(1) of the Clean Air Act, petitions for
judicial review of this action must be filed in the United States Court
of Appeals for the appropriate circuit by August 7, 2023. Filing a
petition for reconsideration by the Administrator of this final rule
does not affect the finality of this action for the purposes of
judicial review nor does it extend the time within which a petition for
judicial review may be filed, and shall not postpone the effectiveness
of such rule or action. This action may not be challenged later in
proceedings to enforce its requirements. (See section 307(b)(2).)

List of Subjects in 40 CFR Part 52

    Environmental protection, Air pollution control, Incorporation by
reference, Intergovernmental relations, Ozone, Reporting and
recordkeeping requirements, Volatile organic compounds.

    Dated: May 31, 2023.
Debra Shore,
Regional Administrator, Region 5.

    For the reasons stated in the preamble, title 40 CFR part 52 is
amended as follows:

PART 52--APPROVAL AND PROMULGATION OF IMPLEMENTATION PLANS

0
1. The authority citation for part 52 continues to read as follows:

    Authority:  42 U.S.C. 7401 et seq.

0
2. Section 52.2570 is amended by removing and reserving paragraphs
(c)(139) and (140) and by adding paragraph (c)(148).
    The addition reads as follows:

Sec.  52.2570  Identification of plan.

* * * * *
    (c) * * *
    (148) On June 28, 2022, WDNR submitted a SIP revisions request that
consists of several additions, corrections, and clarifications within
the Wisconsin Administrative code NR 400 series and updates the VOC
RACT requirements for Miscellaneous Industrial Adhesives and
Miscellaneous Metal and Plastic Parts Coatings CTG

source categories. Also, on August 10, 2022, WDNR submitted a request
to remove from the SIP three Administrative Orders (AM-20-01, AM-20-02,
AM-20-03) previously approved in paragraphs (c)(139) and (140) of this
section. These SIP revisions apply to nonattainment areas in Wisconsin
classified as moderate or above under the 2008 or later ozone standard.
These revisions are consistent with the CTG documents issued by EPA in
2008 and are approvable because they serve as SIP strengthening
measures.
    (i) Incorporation by reference. The following sections of the
Wisconsin Administrative Code are incorporated by reference.
    (A) NR 400.02(intro.), as published in the Wisconsin Register, May
2022 No. 797, effective June 1, 2022.
    (B) NR 419.02(intro.), as published in the Wisconsin Register, May
2022 No. 797, effective June 1, 2022.
    (C) NR 421.02(intro.), as published in the Wisconsin Register, May
2022 No. 797, effective June 1, 2022.
    (D) NR 422.01, NR 422.02, NR 422.03, NR 422.04, NR 422.05, NR
422.06, NR 422.08, NR 422.083, NR 422.084, NR 422.127, NR 422.128, NR
422.14 and 422.145, NR 422.15 and 422.151, as published in the
Wisconsin Register, May 2022 No. 797, effective June 1, 2022.
    (E) NR 423.035(2)(a)1., and NR 423.037(2)(a)1., as published in the
Wisconsin Register, May 2022 No. 797, effective June 1, 2022.
    (F) NR 425.04(3)(a), as published in the Wisconsin Register, May
2022 No. 797, effective June 1, 2022.
    (G) NR 439.04(4) and (5), as published in the Wisconsin Register,
May 2022 No. 797, effective June 1, 2022.
    (H) NR 484.10 Table 5 Rows (9) and (25m), as published in the
Wisconsin Register, May 2022 No. 797, effective June 1, 2022.
    (ii) [Reserved]

[FR Doc. 2023-11893 Filed 6-5-23; 8:45 a.m.]
BILLING CODE 6560-50-P


[Federal Register Volume 76, Number 40 (Tuesday, March 1, 2011)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Pages 11082-11083]
[FR Doc No: 2011-4373]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY

40 CFR Part 52

[EPA-R05-OAR-2006-0976; FRL-9272-1]

Approval and Promulgation of Air Quality Implementation Plans;
Ohio; Oxides of Nitrogen Budget Trading Program; Technical Amendment

AGENCY: Environmental Protection Agency (EPA).

ACTION: Final rule.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: EPA is taking final action to remove codification of a State
Implementation Plan (SIP) approval vacated by the U.S. Court of Appeals
for the Sixth Circuit in a decision dated June 5, 2009. This relates to
Ohio rule revisions concerning 240 allowances under the Nitrogen Oxides
Budget Trading Program added to the SIP by EPA rulemaking dated
February 13, 2008. This final rule conforms the codification of the SIP
to the decision by the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit in
Buckeye Power, Inc. v. EPA (6th Cir., No. 08-3399, June 5, 2009).

DATES: This final rule is effective on March 1, 2011.

ADDRESSES: EPA has established a docket for this action under Docket ID
No. EPA-R05-OAR-2006-0976. All documents in the docket are listed on
the http://www.regulations.gov Web site. Although listed in the index,
some information is not publicly available, i.e., Confidential Business
Information (CBI) or other information whose disclosure is restricted
by statute. Certain other material, such as copyrighted material, is
not placed on the Internet and will be publicly available only in hard
copy form. Publicly available docket materials are available either
electronically through www.regulations.gov or in hard copy at the
Environmental Protection Agency, Region 5, Air and Radiation Division,
77 West Jackson Boulevard, Chicago, Illinois 60604. This facility is
open from 8:30 a.m. to 4:30 p.m., Monday through Friday, excluding
Federal holidays. We recommend that you telephone Anthony Maietta,
Environmental Protection Specialist, at<PHONE_NUMBER> before visiting
the Region 5 office.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Anthony Maietta, Environmental
Protection Specialist, Control Strategies Section, Air Programs Branch
(AR-18J), Environmental Protection Agency, Region 5, 77 West Jackson
Boulevard, Chicago, Illinois 60604,<PHONE_NUMBER>,
<EMAIL_ADDRESS>
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Throughout this document whenever ``we,''
``us,'' or ``our'' is used, we mean EPA. This supplementary information
section is arranged as follows:

I. Background Information
II. What action is EPA taking?
III. Statutory and Executive Order Reviews

I. Background information

    On October 11, 2006, the Ohio Environmental Protection Agency sent
EPA a letter requesting, among other actions, that EPA approve rule
revisions

to withdraw and permanently retire 240 oxides of nitrogen
(NOX) allowances from the State's 2005 new source allowance
set aside under the NOX Budget Trading Program. On February
13, 2008 (73 FR 8197), EPA approved the State's rule revisions, in Ohio
Administrative Code (OAC) rule 3745-14-05, into the Ohio state
implementation plan (SIP). EPA was subsequently sued on our action, and
on June 5, 2009, the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit
vacated our February 13, 2008 rulemaking. As a result, we are amending
the codification of the SIP in the Code of Federal Regulations to
reflect the court's decision. Because our prior rulemaking was vacated
by the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit, our action today is
merely a ministerial action to reflect the court's decision, which
imposes no requirements or costs. Therefore, under 5 U.S.C.
553(b)(3)(B), notice and public comment is unnecessary. For similar
reasons, EPA has good cause to waive the 30 day delayed effective date
under 5 U.S.C. 553(d)(3). This rule is effective upon publication in
the Federal Register.

II. What action is EPA taking?

    EPA is revising the codification of the Ohio SIP by removing a
reference to revisions to OAC 3745-14-05 that were previously
incorporated into the Ohio SIP at 40 CFR 52.1870(c)(142). EPA had
incorporated these revisions to OAC 3745-14-05 into Ohio's SIP in
rulemaking dated February 13, 2008 (73 FR 8197), but the U.S. Court of
Appeals for the Sixth Circuit subsequently vacated this action.
Therefore, in this action, we are removing and reserving the pertinent
paragraph from the Code of Federal Regulations. Reserving this
paragraph is a technical change to the codification of the SIP. This
action does not alter any other Ohio SIP rulemaking actions, and Ohio
is not obligated to take any further action as a result of this action.

III. Statutory and Executive Order Reviews

    This action merely revises the Code of Federal Regulations to
reflect the effect of a federal court order and it does not impose any
requirements. For that reason, this action:
     Is not a ``significant regulatory action'' subject to
review by the Office of Management and Budget under Executive Order
12866 (58 FR 51735, October 4, 1993);
     Does not impose an information collection burden under the
provisions of the Paperwork Reduction Act (44 U.S.C. 3501 et seq.);
     Is certified as not having a significant economic impact
on a substantial number of small entities under the Regulatory
Flexibility Act (5 U.S.C. 601 et seq.);
     Does not contain any unfunded mandate or significantly or
uniquely affect small governments, as described in the Unfunded
Mandates Reform Act of 1995 (Pub. L. 104-4);
     Does not have Federalism implications as specified in
Executive Order 13132 (64 FR 43255, August 10, 1999);
     Is not an economically significant regulatory action based
on health or safety risks subject to Executive Order 13045 (62 FR
19885, April 23, 1997);
     Is not a significant regulatory action subject to
Executive Order 13211 (66 FR 28355, May 22, 2001);
     Is not subject to requirements of Section 12(d) of the
National Technology Transfer and Advancement Act of 1995 (15 U.S.C. 272
note) because application of those requirements would be inconsistent
with the Clean Air Act; and
     Does not provide EPA with the discretionary authority to
address, as appropriate, disproportionate human health or environmental
effects, using practicable and legally permissible methods, under
Executive Order 12898 (59 FR 7629, February 16, 1994).
    In addition, this rule does not have tribal implications as
specified by Executive Order 13175 (65 FR 67249, November 9, 2000),
because the SIP is not approved to apply in Indian country located in
the state, and EPA notes that it will not impose substantial direct
costs on tribal governments or preempt tribal law.
    The Congressional Review Act, 5 U.S.C. 801 et seq., as added by the
Small Business Regulatory Enforcement Fairness Act of 1996, generally
provides that before a rule may take effect, the agency promulgating
the rule must submit a rule report, which includes a copy of the rule,
to each House of the Congress and to the Comptroller General of the
United States. EPA will submit a report containing this action and
other required information to the U.S. Senate, the U.S. House of
Representatives, and the Comptroller General of the United States prior
to publication of the rule in the Federal Register. A major rule cannot
take effect until 60 days after it is published in the Federal
Register. This action is not a ``major rule'' as defined by 5 U.S.C.
804(2).
    Under section 307(b)(1) of the Clean Air Act, petitions for
judicial review of this action must be filed in the United States Court
of Appeals for the appropriate circuit by May 2, 2011. Filing a
petition for reconsideration by the Administrator of this final rule
does not affect the finality of this action for the purposes of
judicial review nor does it extend the time within which a petition for
judicial review may be filed, and shall not postpone the effectiveness
of such rule or action. This action may not be challenged later in
proceedings to enforce its requirements. (See section 307(b)(2).)

List of Subjects in 40 CFR Part 52

    Environmental protection, Air pollution control, Incorporation by
reference, Intergovernmental relations, Oxides of Nitrogen, Oxides of
Nitrogen Budget Trading Program.

    Dated: February 14, 2011.
Susan Hedman,
Regional Administrator, Region 5.

    40 CFR part 52 is amended as follows:

PART 52--[AMENDED]

0
1. The authority citation for part 52 continues to read as follows:

    Authority:  42 U.S.C. 7401 et seq.

Subpart KK--Ohio

Sec.  52.1870  [Amended]

0
2. Section 52.1870 is amended by removing and reserving paragraph
(c)(142).

[FR Doc. 2011-4373 Filed 2-28-11; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6560-50-P