[Federal Register Volume 85, Number 110 (Monday, June 8, 2020)]
[Proposed Rules]
[Pages 34686-34688]
[FR Doc No: 2020-12141]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY

40 CFR Part 52

[EPA-R04-OAR-2018-0631; FRL-10010-11-Region 4]

Air Plan Approval; TN; Nitrogen Oxides SIP Call Plan

AGENCY: Environmental Protection Agency (EPA).

ACTION: Proposed rule.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) is proposing to
approve a State Implementation Plan (SIP) revision concerning nitrogen
oxides (NOX) emissions submitted by the State of Tennessee,
through the Tennessee Department of Environment and Conservation
(TDEC), through a letter dated December 19, 2019, which revises the
Tennessee Air Pollution Control Rule (TAPCR) titled ``NOX
SIP Call Requirements for Stationary Boilers and Combustion Turbines''
(TN 2017 NOX SIP Call Rule) to correct the definition of
``affected unit'' and to clarify requirements related to stationary
boilers and combustion turbines. EPA is also proposing to convert the
conditional approval of the TN 2017 NOX SIP Call Rule to a
full approval.

DATES: Comments must be received on or before July 8, 2020.

ADDRESSES: Submit your comments, identified by Docket ID No. EPA-R04-
OAR-2018-0631 at www.regulations.gov. Follow the online instructions
for submitting comments. Once submitted, comments cannot be edited or
removed from Regulations.gov. EPA may publish any comment received to
its public docket. Do not submit electronically any information you
consider to be Confidential Business Information (CBI) or other
information whose disclosure is restricted by statute. Multimedia
submissions (audio, video, etc.) must be accompanied by a written
comment. The written comment is considered the official comment and
should include discussion of all points you wish to make. EPA will
generally not consider comments or comment contents located outside of
the primary submission (i.e., on the web, cloud, or other file sharing
system). For additional submission methods, the full EPA public comment
policy, information about CBI or multimedia submissions, and general
guidance on making effective comments, please visit www2.epa.gov/dockets/commenting-epa-dockets.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Gobeail McKinley, Air Regulatory
Management Section, Air Planning and Implementation Branch, Air and
Radiation Division, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Region 4, 61
Forsyth Street SW, Atlanta, Georgia 30303-8960. The telephone number is
(404) 562-9230. Ms. McKinley can also be reached via electronic mail at
<EMAIL_ADDRESS>
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

I. Background

    Under Clean Air Act (CAA or Act) section 110(a)(2)(D)(i)(I), which
EPA has traditionally termed the good neighbor provision, states are
required to address the interstate transport of air pollution.
Specifically, the good neighbor provision requires that each state's
implementation plan contain adequate provisions to prohibit air
pollutant emissions from within the state that will significantly
contribute to nonattainment of the national ambient air quality
standards (NAAQS), or that will interfere with maintenance of the
NAAQS, in any other state.
    In October 1998 (63 FR 57356), EPA finalized the ``Finding of
Significant Contribution and Rulemaking for Certain States in the Ozone
Transport Assessment Group Region for Purposes of Reducing Regional
Transport of Ozone'' (``NOX SIP Call''). The NOX
SIP Call required eastern states, including Tennessee, to submit SIPs
that prohibit excessive emissions of ozone season NOX by
implementing statewide emissions budgets.\1\ The NOX SIP
Call addressed the good neighbor provision for the 1979 ozone NAAQS and
was designed to mitigate the impact of transported NOX
emissions, one of the precursors of ozone. EPA developed the
NOX Budget Trading Program, an allowance trading program
that states could adopt to meet their obligations under the
NOX SIP Call. This trading program allowed the following
sources to participate in a regional cap and trade program: Generally
electric generating

units (EGUs) with capacity greater than 25 megawatts (MW); and large
industrial non-EGUs, such as boilers and combustion turbines, with a
rated heat input greater than 250 million British thermal units per
hour (MMBtu/hr). The NOX SIP Call also identified potential
reductions from cement kilns and stationary internal combustion
engines.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \1\ See 63 FR 57356 (October 27, 1998). As originally
promulgated, the NOX SIP Call also addressed good
neighbor obligations under the 1997 8-hour ozone NAAQS, but EPA
subsequently stayed and later rescinded the rule's provisions with
respect to that standard. See 65 FR 56245 (September 18, 2000); 84
FR 8422 (March 8, 2019).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    On January 22, 2004, EPA approved into the Tennessee SIP the
State's NOX Budget Trading Program rule.\2\ The
NOX Budget Trading Program was implemented from 2003 to
2008. The provisions required EGUs and large non-EGUs in the state to
participate in the NOX Budget Trading Program.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \2\ See 69 FR 3015 (January 22, 2004).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    In 2005, EPA published the Clean Air Interstate Rule (CAIR), which
required eastern states, including Tennessee, to submit SIPs that
prohibited emissions consistent with ozone season (and annual)
NOX budgets. See 70 FR 25162 (May 12, 2005). CAIR addressed
the good neighbor provision for the 1997 ozone NAAQS and 1997 fine
particulate matter (PM2.5) NAAQS and was designed to
mitigate the impact of transported NOX emissions with
respect to not only ozone but also PM2.5. CAIR established
several trading programs that EPA implemented through federal
implementation plans (FIPs) for EGUs greater than 25 MW in each
affected state, but not large non-EGUs; states could submit SIPs to
replace the FIPs that achieved the required emission reductions from
EGUs and/or other types of sources.\3\ When the CAIR trading program
for ozone season NOX was implemented beginning in 2009, EPA
discontinued administration of the NOX Budget Trading
Program; however, the requirements of the NOX SIP Call
continued to apply.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \3\ CAIR had separate trading programs for annual sulfur dioxide
emissions, seasonal NOX emissions and annual
NOX emissions.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    On August 20, 2007, EPA approved into the Tennessee SIP an
abbreviated CAIR SIP revision with allowance allocations and opt-in
provisions.\4\ On November 25, 2009, EPA approved into the Tennessee
SIP a further abbreviated CAIR SIP revision expanding applicability of
the CAIR ozone season NOX trading program to NOX
SIP Call non-EGUs.\5\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \4\ See 72 FR 46388.
    \5\ See 74 FR 61535.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    In 2011, EPA published the Cross-State Air Pollution Rule (CSAPR)
to replace CAIR and address the good neighbor provisions for the 1997
ozone NAAQS, the 1997 PM2.5 NAAQS, and the 2006
PM2.5 NAAQS. See 76 FR 48208 (August 8, 2011). Through FIPs,
CSAPR required EGUs in eastern states, including Tennessee, to meet
annual and ozone season NOX emission budgets and annual
SO2 emission budgets implemented through new trading
programs. Implementation of CSAPR began on January 1, 2015.\6\ CSAPR
also contained provisions that would sunset CAIR-related obligations on
a schedule coordinated with the implementation of the CSAPR compliance
requirements.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \6\ See 79 FR 71663 (December 3, 2014) and 81 FR 13275 (March
14, 2016).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    In 2016, EPA published the CSAPR Update to address the good
neighbor provision for the 2008 ozone NAAQS. See 81 FR 74504 (October
26, 2016). Although for most covered states the CSAPR Update may only
partially address the states' good neighbor obligations for this NAAQS,
the rule fully addresses Tennessee's good neighbor obligation for this
NAAQS.\7\ The CSAPR Update trading program replaced the original CSAPR
trading program for ozone season NOX for most covered
states. Tennessee's EGUs participate in the CSAPR Update trading
program, generally also addressing the state's obligations under the
NOX SIP Call for EGUs. However, Tennessee has not chosen to
expand applicability of the CSAPR Update trading program to its large
non-EGUs.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \7\ See 81 FR at 74540. EPA notes that the aspects of the CSAPR
Update affecting Tennessee were not challenged in the litigation
over the rule and are not affected by the remand of the rule in
Wisconsin v. EPA, 983 F.3d 303 (D.C. Cir. 2019).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    Through a letter to EPA dated February 27, 2017,\8\ Tennessee
provided a SIP revision to incorporate a new provision--TACPR 1200-03-
27-.12, ``NOX SIP Call Requirements for Stationary Boilers
and Combustion Turbines'' (TN 2017 NOX SIP Call Rule)--into
the SIP. The TN 2017 NOX SIP Call Rule established a state
control program for sources that are subject to the NOX SIP
Call, but not covered under CSAPR or the CSAPR Update. The TN 2017
NOX SIP Call Rule contains several subsections that together
comprise a non-EGU control program under which Tennessee will allocate
a specified budget of allowances to affected sources. Subsequently, on
May 11, 2018 and October 11, 2018, Tennessee submitted letters
requesting conditional approval of the 2017 NOX SIP Call
Rule and committing to provide a SIP revision to EPA by December 31,
2019, to address a deficiency by revising the definition of ``affected
unit'' to remove the unqualified exclusion for any unit that serves a
generator that produces power for sale. Based on the State's commitment
to submit a SIP revision addressing the identified deficiency, EPA
conditionally approved the February 27, 2017, submission. In the same
action, EPA approved removal of the state's NOX Budget
Trading Program and CAIR rules from the State's SIP. See 84 FR 7998
(March 6, 2019).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \8\ EPA notes that it received the submittal on February 28,
2017.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

II. EPA's Proposed Action

    EPA is proposing to approve Tennessee's December 19, 2019, SIP
submittal, which revises TAPCR 1200-03-27-.12, ``NOX SIP
Call Requirements for Stationary Boilers and Combustion Turbines'' to
correct the definition of ``affected unit'' and to clarify requirements
related to stationary boilers and combustion turbines (additional
details are provided in section III of this proposal). In addition, EPA
is proposing to convert EPA's March 6, 2019, conditional approval to a
full approval.

III. Tennessee's SIP Submission and EPA's Analysis

    In accordance with its commitment letters, Tennessee submitted a
SIP revision on December 19, 2019, requesting EPA approval of revisions
to TAPCR 1200-03-27-.12, ``NOX SIP Call Requirements for
Stationary Boilers and Combustion Turbines.'' To address the deficiency
in the TN 2017 NOX SIP Call Rule identified by EPA, in the
December 19, 2019 submission, the State revises the definition of
``affected unit'' to remove the unqualified exclusion for any unit that
serves a generator that produces power for sale and add exclusions for
units that are subject to the current CSAPR Update trading program for
ozone season NOX. In addition, Tennessee is requesting EPA
approve the following modifications to the rule: (1) Amending the
definition of ``maximum design heat input'' by adding ``MM'' to ``BTU/
hr'' to correct a minor typo; (2) clarifying the formula for the
allocation of NOX allowances to include the number of hours
in Tennessee's ozone season; and (3) clarifying the requirements for a
Responsible Official for purposes of compliance with 40 CFR part 75.\9\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \9\ In addition, EPA is proposing to approve TAPCR 1200-03-
27-.12(7)(b)4, which currently reads [Reserved] and thus has no
substantive requirements, into the SIP. TAPCR 1200-03-27-.12(7)(b)4
has not previously been approved into the Tennessee SIP. See 84 FR
7998 (March 6, 2019).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    EPA has reviewed the December 19, 2019, SIP submission and is
proposing to find that the revisions to TAPCR 1200-03-27-.12 comply
with the NOX SIP Call requirements for non-EGUs and the CAA.
With respect to the changes to the definition of ``affected unit,'' if

approved, Tennessee's SIP will address all types of sources that must
be covered to fully address NOX SIP Call requirements. See
83 FR 64497 (December 17, 2018) (including a discussion of both sources
covered under CSAPR and the sources subject to 1200-03-27-.12). With
respect to the additional modifications to correct minor typographical
errors, the formula for NOX allocations, and the
requirements for the Responsible Official, EPA preliminarily agrees
that the modifications provide additional clarity to the SIP. In
addition, EPA has preliminarily determined that the December 19, 2019,
SIP revision satisfies the conditions listed in EPA's March 6, 2019
conditional approval and is proposing to convert its prior conditional
approval to full approval.

IV. Incorporation by Reference

    In this document, EPA is proposing to include in a final EPA rule
regulatory text that includes incorporation by reference. In accordance
with requirements of 1 CFR 51.5, EPA is proposing to incorporate by
reference TAPCR 1200-03-27-.12, ``NOX SIP Call Requirements
for Stationary Boilers and Combustion Turbines,'' state effective
December 12, 2019, which revises Tennessee's state control program to
comply with the obligations of the NOX SIP Call. EPA has
made and will continue to make the State Implementation Plan generally
available through www.regulations.gov and at the EPA Region 4 Office
(please contact the person identified in the For Further Information
Contact section of this preamble for more information).

V. Proposed Action

    EPA is proposing to approve Tennessee's December 19, 2019,
submission, which revises TAPCR 1200-03-27-.12, ``NOX SIP
Call Requirements for Stationary Boilers and Combustion Turbines,'' to
correct the definition of ``affected unit'' and to clarify requirements
related to stationary boilers and combustion turbines. In addition, EPA
is proposing to convert the March 6, 2019 conditional approval of TAPCR
1200-03-27-.12 to a full approval. EPA requests comment on these
proposals.

VI. Statutory and Executive Order Reviews

    Under the CAA, the Administrator is required to approve a SIP
submission that complies with the provisions of the CAA and applicable
Federal regulations. 42 U.S.C. 7410(k); 40 CFR 52.02(a). Thus, in
reviewing SIP submissions, EPA's role is to approve state choices,
provided that they meet the criteria of the CAA. Accordingly, this
proposed action merely proposes to approve state law as meeting Federal
requirements and does not impose additional requirements beyond those
imposed by state law. For that reason, this proposed action:
     Is not a significant regulatory action subject to review
by the Office of Management and Budget under Executive Orders 12866 (58
FR 51735, October 4, 1993) and 13563 (76 FR 3821, January 21, 2011);
     Is not an Executive Order 13771 (82 FR 9339, February 2,
2017) regulatory action because SIP approvals are exempted under
Executive Order 12866;
     Does not impose an information collection burden under the
provisions of the Paperwork Reduction Act (44 U.S.C. 3501 et seq.);
     Is certified as not having a significant economic impact
on a substantial number of small entities under the Regulatory
Flexibility Act (5 U.S.C. 601 et seq.);
     Does not contain any unfunded mandate or significantly or
uniquely affect small governments, as described in the Unfunded
Mandates Reform Act of 1995 (Pub. L. 104-4);
     Does not have Federalism implications as specified in
Executive Order 13132 (64 FR 43255, August 10, 1999);
     Is not an economically significant regulatory action based
on health or safety risks subject to Executive Order 13045 (62 FR
19885, April 23, 1997);
     Is not a significant regulatory action subject to
Executive Order 13211 (66 FR 28355, May 22, 2001);
     Is not subject to requirements of Section 12(d) of the
National Technology Transfer and Advancement Act of 1995 (15 U.S.C. 272
note) because application of those requirements would be inconsistent
with the CAA; and
     Does not provide EPA with the discretionary authority to
address, as appropriate, disproportionate human health or environmental
effects, using practicable and legally permissible methods, under
Executive Order 12898 (59 FR 7629, February 16, 1994).
    In addition, the SIP is not approved to apply on any Indian
reservation land or in any other area where EPA or an Indian tribe has
demonstrated that a tribe has jurisdiction. In those areas of Indian
country, the rule does not have tribal implications and will not impose
substantial direct costs on tribal governments or preempt tribal law as
specified by Executive Order 13175 (65 FR 67249, November 9, 2000).

List of Subjects in 40 CFR Part 52

    Environmental protection, Air pollution control, Incorporation by
reference, Intergovernmental relations, Nitrogen dioxide, Ozone,
Particulate matter, Reporting and recordkeeping requirements, Sulfur
oxides.

    Authority:  42 U.S.C. 7401 et seq.

    Dated: May 29, 2020.
Mary Walker,
Regional Administrator, Region 4.
[FR Doc. 2020-12141 Filed 6-5-20; 8:45 am]
 BILLING CODE 6560-50-P


[Federal Register Volume 84, Number 54 (Wednesday, March 20, 2019)]
[Notices]
[Page 10306]
[FR Doc No: 2019-05204]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission

[Docket No. AD19-5-000]

Notice of Technical Conference: Review of Cost Submittals by
Other Federal Agencies for Administering Part I of the Federal Power
Act

    In an order issued on October 8, 2004, the Commission set forth a
guideline for Other Federal Agencies (OFAs) to submit their costs
related to Administering Part I of the Federal Power Act. Order on
Rehearing Consolidating Administrative Annual Charges Bill Appeals and
Modifying Annual Charges Billing Procedures, 109 FERC 61,040 (2004)
(October 8 Order). The Commission required OFAs to submit their costs
using the OFA Cost Submission Form. The October 8 Order also announced
that a technical conference would be held for the purpose of reviewing
the submitted cost forms and detailed supporting documentation.
    The Commission will hold a technical conference for reviewing the
submitted OFA costs. The purpose of the conference will be for OFAs and
licensees to discuss costs reported in the forms and any other
supporting documentation or analyses.
    The technical conference will be held on March 28, 2019, in
Conference Room 3M-3 at the Commission's headquarters, 888 First Street
NE, Washington, DC. The technical conference will begin at 2:00 p.m.
(EST).
    The technical conference will also be transcribed. Those interested
in obtaining a copy of the transcript immediately for a fee should
contact the Ace-Federal Reporters, Inc., at<PHONE_NUMBER>, or 1-800-336-
6646. Two weeks after the post-forum meeting, the transcript will be
available for free on the Commission's e-library system. Anyone without
access to the Commission's website or who has questions about the
technical conference should contact Raven A. Rodriguez at (202) 502-
6276 or via email at<EMAIL_ADDRESS>    FERC conferences are accessible under section 508 of the
Rehabilitation Act of 1973. For accessibility accommodations please
send an email to<EMAIL_ADDRESS>or call toll free (866) 208-
3372 (voice),<PHONE_NUMBER> (TTY), or send a FAX to<PHONE_NUMBER> with
the required accommodations.

    Dated: March 14, 2019.
Kimberly D. Bose,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2019-05204 Filed 3-19-19; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6717-01-P


[Federal Register Volume 84, Number 150 (Monday, August 5, 2019)]
[Proposed Rules]
[Pages 37974-37976]
[FR Doc No: 2019-16570]

=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION

Federal Aviation Administration

14 CFR Part 39

[Docket No. FAA-2019-0560; Product Identifier 2018-CE-056-AD]
RIN 2120-AA64

Airworthiness Directives; Glasflugel Gliders

AGENCY: Federal Aviation Administration (FAA), Department of
Transportation (DOT).

ACTION: Notice of proposed rulemaking (NPRM).

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: We propose to supersede Airworthiness Directive (AD) 2018-21-
04 for Glasflugel Models Club Libelle 205, H 301 ``Libelle,'' H 301B
``Libelle,'' Kestrel, Mosquito, Standard ``Libelle,'' and Standard
Libelle-201B gliders. This proposed AD results from mandatory
continuing airworthiness information (MCAI) originated by an aviation
authority of another country to identify and correct an unsafe
condition on an aviation product. The MCAI describes the unsafe
condition as jamming between the double two-ring end of the towing
cable and the deflector angles of the center of gravity (C.G.) release
mechanism. We are issuing this proposed AD to require actions to
address the unsafe condition on these products.

DATES: We must receive comments on this proposed AD by September 19,
2019.

ADDRESSES: You may send comments by any of the following methods:
     Federal eRulemaking Portal: Go to http://www.regulations.gov. Follow the instructions for submitting comments.
     Fax:<PHONE_NUMBER>.
     Mail: U.S. Department of Transportation, Docket
Operations, M-30, West Building Ground Floor, Room W12-140, 1200 New
Jersey Avenue SE, Washington, DC 20590.
     Hand Delivery: U.S. Department of Transportation, Docket
Operations, M-30, West Building Ground Floor, Room W12-140, 1200 New
Jersey Avenue SE, Washington, DC 20590, between 9 a.m. and 5 p.m.,
Monday through Friday, except Federal holidays.
    For service information identified in this proposed AD, contact
Glasfaser Flugzeug-Service GmbH, Hansjorg Streifeneder, Hofener Weg 61,
72582 Grabenstetten, Germany; phone: +49 (0)7382/1032; fax: +49
(0)7382/1629; email<EMAIL_ADDRESS>internet: http://www.streifly.de/kontakt-e.htm. You may review copies of the referenced
service

information at the FAA, Policy and Innovation Division, 901 Locust,
Kansas City, Missouri 64106. For information on the availability of
this material at the FAA, call<PHONE_NUMBER>.

Examining the AD Docket

    You may examine the AD docket on the internet at http://www.regulations.gov by searching for and locating Docket No. FAA-2019-
0560; or in person at Docket Operations between 9 a.m. and 5 p.m.,
Monday through Friday, except Federal holidays. The AD docket contains
this proposed AD, the regulatory evaluation, any comments received, and
other information. The street address for Docket Operations (telephone
(800) 647-5527) is in the ADDRESSES section. Comments will be available
in the AD docket shortly after receipt.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Jim Rutherford, Aerospace Engineer,
FAA, Policy and Innovation Divsion, 901 Locust, Room 301, Kansas City,
Missouri 64106; telephone:<PHONE_NUMBER>; fax:<PHONE_NUMBER>; email:
<EMAIL_ADDRESS>
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

Comments Invited

    We invite you to send any written relevant data, views, or
arguments about this proposed AD. Send your comments to an address
listed under the ADDRESSES section. Include ``Docket No. FAA-2019-0560;
Product Identifier 2018-CE-056-AD'' at the beginning of your comments.
We specifically invite comments on the overall regulatory, economic,
environmental, and energy aspects of this proposed AD. We will consider
all comments received by the closing date and may amend this proposed
AD because of those comments.
    We will post all comments we receive, without change, to http://regulations.gov, including any personal information you provide. We
will also post a report summarizing each substantive verbal contact we
receive about this proposed AD.

Discussion

    We issued a Final rule; request for comment to add AD 2018-21-04,
Amendment 39-19462 (83 FR 53573, October 24, 2018) (``AD 2018-21-04'')
to address an unsafe condition on Glasflugel Models Club Libelle 205, H
301 ``Libelle,'' H 301B ``Libelle,'' Kestrel, Mosquito, Standard
``Libelle,'' and Standard Libelle-201B gliders. AD 2018-21-04 requires
inspecting the distance between the deflector-angles of the C.G.
release mechanism and revising the operations section of the sailplane
flight manual (SFM) before the next winch launch.
    AD 2018-21-04 was based on MCAI originated by an aviation authority
of another country. The European Aviation Safety Agency (EASA), which
is the Technical Agent for the Member States of the European Community,
has issued Emergency AD No. 2018-0143-E (referred to after this as
``the MCAI''), to correct an unsafe condition for the specified
products. The MCAI states:

    Jamming between the double two ring end of the towing cable and
the deflector angles of the C.G. release mechanism was reported.
Subsequent investigation identified incorrect geometry of the
deflector angles of the affected part as likely cause of the
jamming.
    This condition, if not detected and corrected, could lead to
failure to disconnect the towing cable, possibly resulting in
reduced or loss of control of the sailplane.
    To address this potential unsafe condition, Glasfaser Flugzeug-
Service GmbH issued the TN [Technical Note] to provide inspection
instructions and corrective action.
    For the reasons described above, this [EASA] AD requires
repetitive inspections of the affected part, and, depending on
findings, accomplishment of applicable corrective action(s). This
[EASA] AD also requires amendment of the sailplane Aircraft Flight
Manual (AFM).

    We issued AD 2018-21-04 as an interim action to address the
immediate need for the initial inspection of the distance between the
deflector-angles of the C.G. release mechanism, any necessary
corrective action, and the revision of the flying operations section of
the SFM. We are proposing this superseding AD to address the long-term
need to repeat the inspection of the C.G. release mechanism for the
distance between the deflector-angles at intervals not to exceed 12
months. Because this proposed requirement is for a longer interval, we
are providing the public an opportunity to comment. You may examine the
MCAI on the internet at http://www.regulations.gov by searching for and
locating Docket No. FAA-2019-0560.

Related Service Information Under 1 CFR Part 51

    We reviewed Glasfaser-Flugzeug-Service GmbH Technical Note No. 5-
2018, dated June 25, 2018, which is incorporated by reference in AD
2018-21-04. The service information describes procedures for measuring
the distance between the deflector-angles at the C.G. release and
modifying the deflector-angles if necessary. This service information
is reasonably available because the interested parties have access to
it through their normal course of business or by the means identified
in the ADDRESSES section of this NPRM.

FAA's Determination and Requirements of the Proposed AD

    This product has been approved by the aviation authority of another
country, and is approved for operation in the United States. Pursuant
to our bilateral agreement with this State of Design Authority, they
have notified us of the unsafe condition described in the MCAI and
service information referenced above. We are proposing this AD because
we evaluated all information and determined the unsafe condition exists
and is likely to exist or develop on other products of the same type
design.

Costs of Compliance

    We estimate that this proposed AD will affect 177 products of U.S.
registry. We also estimate that it would take about 1 work-hour per
product to comply with the inspection requirements and revision of the
flying operations section of the sailplane flight manual of this
proposed AD. The average labor rate is $85 per work-hour.
    Based on these figures, we estimate the cost of the AD on U.S.
operators to be $15,045, or $85 per product, per inspection cycle.
    We estimate that any modification of the deflector-angles that may
be necessary as a result of the inspection would take about 4 work-
hours and require parts costing $100, for a cost of $440 per product.
We have no way of determining the number of products that may need
these actions.
    This proposed AD retains the actions of AD 2018-21-04. The
estimated costs of initial inspection, any necessary modification, and
revision of the flying operations section of the SFM remain the same as
AD 2018-21-04 and do not impose an additional burden beyond the cost of
repeating the inspection every 12 months.

Authority for This Rulemaking

    Title 49 of the United States Code specifies the FAA's authority to
issue rules on aviation safety. Subtitle I, section 106, describes the
authority of the FAA Administrator. ``Subtitle VII: Aviation
Programs,'' describes in more detail the scope of the Agency's
authority.
    We are issuing this rulemaking under the authority described in
``Subtitle VII, Part A, Subpart III, Section 44701: General
requirements.'' Under that section, Congress charges the FAA with
promoting safe flight of civil aircraft in air commerce by prescribing
regulations for practices, methods, and procedures

the Administrator finds necessary for safety in air commerce. This
regulation is within the scope of that authority because it addresses
an unsafe condition that is likely to exist or develop on products
identified in this rulemaking action.
    This AD is issued in accordance with authority delegated by the
Executive Director, Aircraft Certification Service, as authorized by
FAA Order 8000.51C. In accordance with that order, issuance of ADs is
normally a function of the Compliance and Airworthiness Division, but
during this transition period, the Executive Director has delegated the
authority to issue ADs applicable to small airplanes, gliders,
balloons, airships, domestic business jet transport airplanes, and
associated appliances to the Director of the Policy and Innovation
Division.

Regulatory Findings

    We determined that this proposed AD would not have federalism
implications under Executive Order 13132. This proposed AD would not
have a substantial direct effect on the States, on the relationship
between the national Government and the States, or on the distribution
of power and responsibilities among the various levels of government.
    For the reasons discussed above, I certify this proposed
regulation:
    (1) Is not a ``significant regulatory action'' under Executive
Order 12866,
    (2) Is not a ``significant rule'' under the DOT Regulatory Policies
and Procedures (44 FR 11034, February 26, 1979),
    (3) Will not affect intrastate aviation in Alaska, and
    (4) Will not have a significant economic impact, positive or
negative, on a substantial number of small entities under the criteria
of the Regulatory Flexibility Act.

List of Subjects in 14 CFR Part 39

    Air transportation, Aircraft, Aviation safety, Incorporation by
reference, Safety.

The Proposed Amendment

    Accordingly, under the authority delegated to me by the
Administrator, the FAA proposes to amend 14 CFR part 39 as follows:

PART 39--AIRWORTHINESS DIRECTIVES

0
1. The authority citation for part 39 continues to read as follows:

    Authority: 49 U.S.C. 106(g), 40113, 44701.

Sec.  39.13   [Amended]

0
2. The FAA amends Sec.  39.13 by removing Airworthiness Directive (AD)
2018-21-04, Amendment 39-19462 (83 FR 53573; October 24, 2018), and
adding the following new AD:

Glasflugel: Docket No. FAA-2019-0560; Product Identifier 2018-CE-
056-AD.

(a) Comments Due Date

    We must receive comments by September 19, 2019.

(b) Affected ADs

    This AD replaces AD 2018-21-04, Amendment 39-19462 (83 FR 53573,
October 24, 2018) (``AD 2018-21-04'').

(c) Applicability

    This AD applies to Glasflugel Models Club Libelle 205, H 301
``Libelle,'' H 301B ``Libelle,'' Kestrel, Mosquito, Standard
``Libelle,'' and Standard Libelle-201B gliders, certificated in any
category, with a center of gravity (C.G.) tow release installed.

(d) Subject

    Air Transport Association of America (ATA) Code 25: Equipment/
Furnishing.

(e) Reason

    This proposed AD was prompted by mandatory continuing
airworthiness information (MCAI) issued by the aviation authority of
another country to identify and correct an unsafe condition on an
aviation product. The MCAI describes the unsafe condition as jamming
between the double two-ring end of the towing cable and the
deflector angles of the C.G. release mechanism. We are issuing this
AD to prevent failure of the towing cable to disconnect, which could
result in reduced or loss of control of the glider or the cable
breaking and causing injury to people on the ground.

(f) Actions and Compliance

    Unless already done, do the following actions in paragraphs
(f)(1) through (3) of this AD.
    (1) Before the next winch launch after November 13, 2018 (the
effective date of AD 2018-21-04) and thereafter at intervals not to
exceed 12 months, inspect the distance between the deflector-angles
by following paragraph 1 in the Actions section of Glasfaser-
Flugzeug-Service GmbH Technical Note No. 5-2018, dated June 25,
2018.
    (2) If the distance is less than 36 mm during any inspection
required in paragraph (f)(1) of this AD, before the next winch
launch, do the corrective action in paragraph 2 in the Actions
section of Glasfaser-Flugzeug-Service GmbH Technical Note No. 5-
2018, dated June 25, 2018.
    (3) Before the next winch launch after November 13, 2018 (the
effective date of AD 2018-21-04), revise the flying operations
section of the sailplane flight manual by inserting the text in
paragraph (f)(3)(i) of this AD into the winch tow section.
    (i) Winch launching is permissible only with a connecting ring
pair that conforms to aeronautical standard LN 65091.
    (ii) This action may be done by the owner/operator (pilot)
holding at least a private pilot certificate and must be entered
into the aircraft records showing compliance with this AD by
following 14 CFR 43.9 (a)(1) through (4) and 14 CFR 91.417(a)(2)(v).
The record must be maintained as required by 14 CFR 91.417, 121.380,
or 135.439.

(g) Alternative Methods of Compliance (AMOCs)

    The Manager, Standards Office, FAA, has the authority to approve
AMOCs for this AD, if requested using the procedures found in 14 CFR
39.19. Send information to ATTN: Jim Rutherford, Aerospace Engineer,
FAA, Policy and Innovation Divsion, 901 Locust, Room 301, Kansas
City, Missouri 64106; telephone:<PHONE_NUMBER>; fax: (816) 329-
4090; email<EMAIL_ADDRESS>Before using any approved AMOC
on any airplane to which the AMOC applies, notify your appropriate
principal inspector (PI) in the FAA Flight Standards District Office
(FSDO), or lacking a PI, your local FSDO.

(h) Related Information

    Refer to MCAI EASA AD No. 2018-0143-E, dated July 6, 2018, for
related information. You may examine the MCAI on the internet at
http://www.regulations.gov by searching for and locating Docket No.
FAA-2019-0560. For service information related to this AD, contact
Glasfaser Flugzeug-Service GmbH, Hansjorg Streifeneder, Hofener Weg
61, 72582 Grabenstetten, Germany; phone: +49 (0)7382/1032; fax: +49
(0)7382/1629; email<EMAIL_ADDRESS>internet: http://www.streifly.de/kontakt-e.htm. You may review copies of the
referenced service information at the FAA, Policy and Innovation
Division, 901 Locust, Kansas City, Missouri 64106. For information
on the availability of this material at the FAA, call (816) 329-
4148.

    Issued in Kansas City, Missouri, on July 19, 2019.
Melvin J. Johnson,
Aircraft Certification Service, Deputy Director, Policy and Innovation
Division, AIR-601.
[FR Doc. 2019-16570 Filed 8-2-19; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910-13-P


[Federal Register Volume 84, Number 219 (Wednesday, November 13, 2019)]
[Notices]
[Page 61609]
[FR Doc No: 2019-24631]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission

[Docket No. ER20-319-000]

Kimball Wind LLC; Supplemental Notice That Initial Market-Based
Rate Filing Includes Request for Blanket Section 204 Authorization

    This is a supplemental notice in the above-referenced proceeding of
Kimball Wind LLC's application for market-based rate authority, with an
accompanying rate tariff, noting that such application includes a
request for blanket authorization, under 18 CFR part 34, of future
issuances of securities and assumptions of liability.
    Any person desiring to intervene or to protest should file with the
Federal Energy Regulatory Commission, 888 First Street NE, Washington,
DC 20426, in accordance with Rules 211 and 214 of the Commission's
Rules of Practice and Procedure (18 CFR 385.211 and 385.214). Anyone
filing a motion to intervene or protest must serve a copy of that
document on the Applicant.
    Notice is hereby given that the deadline for filing protests with
regard to the applicant's request for blanket authorization, under 18
CFR part 34, of future issuances of securities and assumptions of
liability, is November 26, 2019.
    The Commission encourages electronic submission of protests and
interventions in lieu of paper, using the FERC Online links at http://www.ferc.gov. To facilitate electronic service, persons with internet
access who will eFile a document and/or be listed as a contact for an
intervenor must create and validate an eRegistration account using the
eRegistration link. Select the eFiling link to log on and submit the
intervention or protests.
    Persons unable to file electronically should submit an original and
5 copies of the intervention or protest to the Federal Energy
Regulatory Commission, 888 First Street NE, Washington, DC 20426.
    The filings in the above-referenced proceeding are accessible in
the Commission's eLibrary system by clicking on the appropriate link in
the above list. They are also available for electronic review in the
Commission's Public Reference Room in Washington, DC. There is an
eSubscription link on the website that enables subscribers to receive
email notification when a document is added to a subscribed docket(s).
For assistance with any FERC Online service, please email
<EMAIL_ADDRESS>or call<PHONE_NUMBER> (toll free). For
TTY, call<PHONE_NUMBER>.

    Dated: November 6, 2019.
Kimberly D. Bose,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2019-24631 Filed 11-12-19; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6717-01-P


[Federal Register Volume 88, Number 13 (Friday, January 20, 2023)]
[Notices]
[Page 3736]
[FR Doc No: 2023-01061]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission

[Docket No. CP95-35-000]

EcoEl[eacute]ctrica, L.P.; Supplemental Notice of Technical
Conference

    As announced in the Notice of Technical Conference issued in this
proceeding on December 14, 2022, the Federal Energy Regulatory
Commission (Commission) will convene a Commission staff-led technical
conference to discuss issues raised related to the structural analysis
of EcoEl[eacute]ctrica, L.P.'s (EcoEl[eacute]ctrica) liquefied natural
gas (LNG) storage tank at its LNG terminal in Pe[ntilde]uelas, Puerto
Rico. The technical conference will be held on January 18-19, 2023,
from approximately 9:00 a.m. to 4:00 p.m. Eastern time. The conference
will be held virtually and in person (Federal Energy Regulatory
Commission, 888 First Street NE, Washington, DC). The agenda for this
event is attached. The technical conference will not be open for the
public to attend. Only those specified in the December 14, 2022 Notice
may attend.
    Commission conferences are accessible under section 508 of the
Rehabilitation Act of 1973. For accessibility accommodations, please
send an email to [email protected], call toll-free<PHONE_NUMBER>
(voice) or<PHONE_NUMBER> (TTY), or send a fax to<PHONE_NUMBER> with
the required accommodations.
    For more information about this technical conference including how
to participate, virtual and in person meeting details, etc., please
contact Karla Bathrick at [email protected] or at<PHONE_NUMBER>.

    Dated: January 13, 2023.
Kimberly D. Bose,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2023-01061 Filed 1-19-23; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6717-01-P


[Federal Register: December 5, 2008 (Volume 73, Number 235)]
[Notices]
[Page 74225]
[DOCID:fr05de08-129]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION

Federal Aviation Administration

Notice of Intent To Rule on Request To Release Airport Property
at the Killeen-Skylark Field, Killeen, TX

AGENCY: Federal Aviation Administration (FAA), DOT.

ACTION: Notice of request to release airport property.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The FAA proposes to rule and invite public comment on the
release of land at the Killeen-Skylark Field under the provisions of
Section 125 of the Wendell H. Ford Aviation Investment Reform Act for
the 21st Century (AIR 21).

DATES: Comments must be received on or before January 5, 2009.

ADDRESSES: Comments on this application may be mailed or delivered to
the FAA at the following address: Mr. Mike Nicely, Manager, Federal
Aviation Administration, Southwest Region, Airports Division, Texas
Airports Development Office, ASW-650, Fort Worth, Texas 76193-0650.
    In addition, one copy of any comments submitted to the FAA must be
mailed or delivered to Mr. John W. Sutton, Director of Aviation, at the
following address: 8101 Clear Creek Road, Box C, Killeen, Texas 76549-
2557.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Mr. Steven Cooks, Program Manager,
Federal Aviation Administration, Texas Airports Development Office,
ASW-650, 2601 Meacham Boulevard, Fort Worth, Texas 76193-0650,
Telephone:<PHONE_NUMBER>, e-mail<EMAIL_ADDRESS>fax: (817)
222-5989.
    The request to release property may be reviewed in person at this
same location.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The FAA invites public comment on the
request to release property at the Killeen-Skylark Field under the
provisions of the AIR 21.
    The following is a brief overview of the request:
    The City of Killeen requests the release of 15.058 acres of non-
aeronautical airport property. This property was incorporated into the
airport by an agreement with the FAA in 1988. The property to be
released will be sold to allow for future development and maintenance
of the airport.
    Any person may inspect the request in person at the FAA office
listed above under FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT.
    In addition, any person may, upon request, inspect the application,
notice and other documents relevant to the application in person at the
Killeen-Skylark Field, telephone number<PHONE_NUMBER>.

    Issued in Fort Worth, Texas on October 9, 2008.
Kelvin Solco,
Manager, Airports Division.
[FR Doc. E8-28744 Filed 12-4-08; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4910-13-M


[Federal Register: November 25, 2009 (Volume 74, Number 226)]
[Notices]
[Page 61719-61720]
[DOCID:fr25no09-107]

=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

Proposed Collection; Comment Request

Upon Written Request, Copies Available From: Securities and Exchange
Commission, Office of Investor Education and Advocacy, Washington, DC
20549-0213.

Extension:
    Rule 23c-3 and Form N-23c-3; SEC File No. 270-373; OMB Control
No. 3235-0422.

    Notice is hereby given that, pursuant to the Paperwork Reduction
Act of 1995 (44 U.S.C. 350 et seq.), the Securities and Exchange
Commission (the ``Commission'') has submitted to the Office of
Management and Budget a request for extension of the previously
approved collection of information discussed below.
    Rule 23c-3 (17 CFR 270.23c-3) under the Investment Company Act of
1940 (15 U.S.C. 80a-1 et seq.) is entitled: ``Repurchase of Securities
of Closed-End Companies.'' The rule permits certain closed-end
investment companies (``closed-end funds'' or ``funds'') to offer to
repurchase from shareholders a limited number of shares at net asset
value. The rule includes several reporting and recordkeeping
requirements. The fund must send shareholders a notification that
contains specified information each time the fund makes a repurchase
offer (on a quarterly, semi-annual, or annual basis, or for certain
funds, on a discretionary basis not more often than every two years).
The fund also must file copies of the shareholder notification with the
Commission (electronically through the Commission's Electronic Data
Gathering, Analysis, and Retrieval System (``EDGAR'')) attached to Form
N-23c-3 (17 CFR 274.221), a filing that provides limited information
about the fund and the type of offer the fund is making.\1\ The fund
must describe in its annual report to shareholders the fund's policy
concerning repurchase offers and the results of any repurchase offers
made during the reporting period. The fund's board of directors must
adopt written procedures designed to ensure that the fund's investment
portfolio is sufficiently liquid to meet its repurchase obligations and
other obligations under the rule. The board periodically must review
the composition of the fund's portfolio and change the liquidity
procedures as necessary. The fund also must file copies of
advertisements and other sales literature with the Commission as if it
were an open-end investment company subject to section 24 of the
Investment Company Act (15 U.S.C. 80a-24) and the rules that implement
section 24.\2\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \1\ Form N-23c-3 requires the fund to state its registration
number, its full name and address, the date of the accompanying
shareholder notification, and the type of offer being made
(periodic, discretionary, or both).
    \2\ Rule 24b-3 under the Investment Company Act (17 CFR 270.24b-
3), however, would generally exempt the fund from that requirement
when the materials are filed instead with the Financial Industry
Regulatory Authority (``FINRA''). These materials are virtually
always submitted to FINRA, instead of the Commission, under FINRA
procedures which apply to the underwriter of every fund.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    The requirement that the fund send a notification to shareholders
of each offer is intended to ensure that a fund provides material
information to shareholders about the terms of each offer, which may
differ from previous offers on such matters as the maximum amount of
shares to be repurchased (the maximum repurchase amount may range from
5% to 25% of outstanding shares). The requirement that copies be sent
to the Commission is intended to enable the Commission to monitor the
fund's compliance with the notification requirement. The requirement
that the shareholder notification be attached to Form N-23c-3 is
intended to ensure that the fund provides basic information necessary
for the Commission to process the notification and to monitor the
fund's use of repurchase offers. The requirement that the fund describe
its current policy on repurchase offers and the results of recent
offers in the annual shareholder report is intended to provide
shareholders current information about the fund's repurchase policies
and its recent experience. The requirement that the board approve and
review written procedures designed to maintain portfolio liquidity is
intended to ensure that the fund has enough cash or liquid securities
to meet its repurchase obligations, and that written procedures are
available for review by shareholders and examination by the Commission.
The requirement that the fund file advertisements and sales literature
as if it were an open-end investment company is intended to facilitate
the review of these materials by the Commission or FINRA to prevent
incomplete, inaccurate, or misleading disclosure about the special
characteristics of a closed-end fund that makes periodic repurchase
offers.
    Compliance with the collection of information requirements of the
rule and form is mandatory only for those funds that rely on the rule
in order to repurchase shares of the fund. The information provided to
the Commission on Form N-23c-3 will not be kept confidential. An agency
may not conduct or sponsor, and a person is not required to respond to,
a collection of information unless it displays a currently valid
control number.
    The Commission staff estimates that 31 funds make use of rule 23c-3
annually, including one fund that is relying upon rule 23c-3 for the
first time. The Commission staff estimates that on average a fund
spends 89 hours annually in complying with the requirements of the rule
and Form N-23c-3, with funds relying upon rule 23c-3 for the first time
incurring an additional one-time burden of 28 hours. The Commission
therefore estimates the total annual burden of the rule's and form's
paperwork requirements to be 2787 hours.
    Written comments are invited on: (a) Whether the collections of
information are necessary for the proper performance of the functions
of the Commission, including whether the information has practical
utility; (b) the accuracy of the Commission's estimate of the burdens
of the collections of information; (c) ways to enhance the quality,
utility, and clarity of the information collected; and (d) ways to
minimize the burdens of the collections of information on respondents,
including through the use of automated collection techniques or other
forms of information technology. Consideration will be given to
comments and

suggestions submitted in writing within 60 days of this publication.
    Please direct your written comments to Charles Boucher, Director/
CIO, Securities and Exchange Commission, C/O Shirley Martinson, 6432
General Green Way, Alexandria, VA 22312; or send an e-mail to: PRA_
<EMAIL_ADDRESS>
    Dated: November 17, 2009.
Florence E. Harmon,
Deputy Secretary.
[FR Doc. E9-28228 Filed 11-24-09; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 8011-01-P


[Federal Register Volume 80, Number 123 (Friday, June 26, 2015)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Pages 36707-36710]
[FR Doc No: 2015-15615]

=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION

Federal Aviation Administration

14 CFR Part 39

[Docket No. FAA-2015-1986; Directorate Identifier 2012-NM-100-AD;
Amendment 39-18188; AD 2015-13-01]
RIN 2120-AA64

Airworthiness Directives; ATR-GIE Avions de Transport
R[eacute]gional Airplanes

AGENCY: Federal Aviation Administration (FAA), Department of
Transportation (DOT).

ACTION: Final rule; request for comments.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: We are adopting a new airworthiness directive (AD) for certain
ATR-GIE Avions de Transport R[eacute]gional Model ATR42-500 and ATR72-
212A airplanes. This AD requires inspection of the affected control
systems rods and, depending on findings, a replacement of the affected
rods. This AD was prompted by reports of non-conformity of certain
control rods, which could result in failure of the control rods. We are
issuing this AD to detect and correct failure of an affected control
rod, which, under certain circumstances, could result in reduced
control of the airplane.

DATES: This AD becomes effective July 13, 2015.
    The Director of the Federal Register approved the incorporation by
reference of certain publications listed in this AD as of July 13,
2015.
    We must receive comments on this AD by August 10, 2015.

ADDRESSES: You may send comments, using the procedures found in 14 CFR
11.43 and 11.45, by any of the following methods:
     Federal eRulemaking Portal: Go to http://www.regulations.gov. Follow the instructions for submitting comments.
     Fax:<PHONE_NUMBER>.
     Mail: U.S. Department of Transportation, Docket
Operations, M-30, West Building Ground Floor, Room W12-140, 1200 New
Jersey Avenue SE., Washington, DC 20590.
     Hand Delivery: U.S. Department of Transportation, Docket
Operations, M-30, West Building Ground Floor, Room W12-140, 1200 New
Jersey Avenue SE., Washington, DC, between 9 a.m. and 5 p.m., Monday
through Friday, except Federal holidays.
    For service information identified in this AD, contact ATR-GIE
Avions de Transport R[eacute]gional, 1, All[eacute]e Pierre Nadot,
31712 Blagnac Cedex, France; telephone +33 (0) 5 62 21 62 21; fax +33
(0) 5 62 21 67 18; email<EMAIL_ADDRESS>Internet
http://www.aerochain.com. You may view this referenced service
information at the FAA, Transport Airplane Directorate, 1601 Lind
Avenue SW., Renton, WA. For information on the availability of this
material at the FAA, call<PHONE_NUMBER>. It is also available on the
Internet at http://www.regulations.gov by searching for and locating
Docket No. FAA-2015-1986.

Examining the AD Docket

    You may examine the AD docket on the Internet at http://www.regulations.gov by searching for and locating Docket No. FAA-2015-
1986; or in person at the Docket Operations office between 9 a.m. and 5
p.m., Monday through Friday, except Federal holidays. The AD docket
contains this AD, the regulatory evaluation, any comments received, and
other information. The street address for the Docket Operations office
(telephone<PHONE_NUMBER>) is in the ADDRESSES section. Comments will be
available in the AD docket shortly after receipt.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Tom Rodriguez, Aerospace Engineer,
International Branch, ANM-116, Transport Airplane Directorate, FAA,
1601 Lind Avenue SW., Renton, WA 98057-3356; telephone<PHONE_NUMBER>;
fax<PHONE_NUMBER>.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

Discussion

    The European Aviation Safety Agency (EASA), which is the Technical
Agent for the Member States of the European Union, has issued EASA
Airworthiness Directive 2012-0064, dated April 20, 2012 (referred to
after this as the Mandatory Continuing Airworthiness Information, or
``the MCAI''), to correct an unsafe condition for Model ATR42-500 and
ATR72-212A airplanes. The MCAI states:

    Prompted by the findings that led to publication of EASA AD
2010-0063-E, additional quality investigation showed that the non-
conformity of certain control rods, which was due to incorrect
polishing during the rod manufacturing process, could also affect
other flight control rods [and could result in failure of the
control rods].
    These other potentially non-conforming control rods are
installed on elevator controls, rudder pedal assemblies and rudder
tab controls of certain ATR aeroplanes.
    This condition, if not detected and corrected, could lead to
failure of an affected control rod which, under certain
circumstances, could result in reduced control of the aeroplane.
    As a result of further investigations, other batches have been
incriminated, in addition to the ones identified by EASA AD 2010-
0063-E, and new safety analyses also indicate the need for
replacement of the rods (within an adapted compliance time), which
had passed the check required by EASA AD 2010-0063-E. Consequently,
EASA AD 2010-0063-E is superseded by this new AD.
    For the reasons described above, this [EASA] AD requires a one-
time inspection of the affected control systems rods and, depending
on findings, replacement of the affected rods.

You may examine the MCAI on the Internet at http://www.regulations.gov
by searching for and locating Docket No. FAA-2015-1986.

Related Service Information Under 1 CFR Part 51

    ATR-GIE Avions de Transport R[eacute]gional (ATR) has issued the
following service information.
     ATR Service Bulletin ATR42-27-0104, Revision 01, dated
August 30, 2011.
     ATR Service Bulletin ATR42-27-0105, Revision 01, dated
August 30, 2011.
     ATR Service Bulletin ATR72-27-1065, Revision 02, dated
August 30, 2011.

     ATR Service Bulletin ATR72-27-1066, Revision 01, dated
August 30, 2011.
    This service information describes procedures for the inspection of
affected control systems rods and, depending on findings, a replacement
of the affected rods. This service information is reasonably available
because the interested parties have access to it through their normal
course of business or by the means identified in the ADDRESSES section
of this AD.

FAA's Determination and Requirements of This AD

    This product has been approved by the aviation authority of another
country, and is approved for operation in the United States. Pursuant
to our bilateral agreement with the State of Design Authority, we have
been notified of the unsafe condition described in the MCAI and service
information referenced above. We are issuing this AD because we
evaluated all pertinent information and determined the unsafe condition
exists and is likely to exist or develop on other products of the same
type designs.
    There are no products of this type currently registered in the
United States; however, this rule is necessary to ensure that the
described unsafe condition is addressed if any of these products are
placed on the U.S. Register in the future.

Differences Between This AD and the MCAI or Service Information

    The actions specified in paragraph (4) of the MCAI, for rudder
pedals that have been inspected according to EASA AD 2010-0063-E, dated
April 1, 2010, is not included in this AD because the those actions
were not required by any FAA AD.
    Although the MCAI requires using a certain repair manual to repair
certain conditions, paragraph (i) of this AD requires repair using a
method approved by the Manager, International Branch, ANM-116,
Transport Airplane Directorate, FAA; or the European Aviation Safety
Agency (EASA); or ATR-GIE Avions de Transport R[eacute]gional's EASA
Design Organization Approval (DOA).

FAA's Determination of the Effective Date

    Since there are currently no domestic operators of this product,
notice and opportunity for public comment before issuing this AD are
unnecessary.

Comments Invited

    This AD is a final rule that involves requirements affecting flight
safety, and we did not precede it by notice and opportunity for public
comment. We invite you to send any written relevant data, views, or
arguments about this AD. Send your comments to an address listed under
the ADDRESSES section. Include ``Docket No. FAA-2015-1986; Directorate
Identifier 2012-NM-100-AD'' at the beginning of your comments. We
specifically invite comments on the overall regulatory, economic,
environmental, and energy aspects of this AD. We will consider all
comments received by the closing date and may amend this AD based on
those comments.
    We will post all comments we receive, without change, to http://www.regulations.gov, including any personal information you provide. We
will also post a report summarizing each substantive verbal contact we
receive about this AD.

Costs of Compliance

    Currently, there are no affected airplanes on the U.S. Register.
However, if an affected airplane is imported and placed on the U.S.
Register in the future, we estimate that it will take about 1 work-hour
per product to comply with the basic requirements of this AD. The
average labor rate is $85 per work-hour. Required parts will cost $0
per product. Based on these figures, we estimate the cost of this AD on
U.S. operators to be $85 per product.

Paperwork Reduction Act

    A federal agency may not conduct or sponsor, and a person is not
required to respond to, nor shall a person be subject to penalty for
failure to comply with a collection of information subject to the
requirements of the Paperwork Reduction Act unless that collection of
information displays a current valid OMB control number. The control
number for the collection of information required by this AD is 2120-
0056. The paperwork cost associated with this AD has been detailed in
the Costs of Compliance section of this document and includes time for
reviewing instructions, as well as completing and reviewing the
collection of information. Therefore, all reporting associated with
this AD is mandatory. Comments concerning the accuracy of this burden
and suggestions for reducing the burden should be directed to the FAA
at 800 Independence Ave. SW., Washington, DC 20591, ATTN: Information
Collection Clearance Officer, AES-200.

Authority for This Rulemaking

    Title 49 of the United States Code specifies the FAA's authority to
issue rules on aviation safety. Subtitle I, section 106, describes the
authority of the FAA Administrator. ``Subtitle VII: Aviation
Programs,'' describes in more detail the scope of the Agency's
authority.
    We are issuing this rulemaking under the authority described in
``Subtitle VII, Part A, Subpart III, Section 44701: General
requirements.'' Under that section, Congress charges the FAA with
promoting safe flight of civil aircraft in air commerce by prescribing
regulations for practices, methods, and procedures the Administrator
finds necessary for safety in air commerce. This regulation is within
the scope of that authority because it addresses an unsafe condition
that is likely to exist or develop on products identified in this
rulemaking action.

Regulatory Findings

    We determined that this AD will not have federalism implications
under Executive Order 13132. This AD will not have a substantial direct
effect on the States, on the relationship between the national
government and the States, or on the distribution of power and
responsibilities among the various levels of government.
    For the reasons discussed above, I certify that this AD:
    1. Is not a ``significant regulatory action'' under Executive Order
12866;
    2. Is not a ``significant rule'' under the DOT Regulatory Policies
and Procedures (44 FR 11034, February 26, 1979);
    3. Will not affect intrastate aviation in Alaska; and
    4. Will not have a significant economic impact, positive or
negative, on a substantial number of small entities under the criteria
of the Regulatory Flexibility Act.

List of Subjects in 14 CFR Part 39

    Air transportation, Aircraft, Aviation safety, Incorporation by
reference, Safety.

Adoption of the Amendment

    Accordingly, under the authority delegated to me by the
Administrator, the FAA amends 14 CFR part 39 as follows:

PART 39--AIRWORTHINESS DIRECTIVES

0
1. The authority citation for part 39 continues to read as follows:

    Authority:  49 U.S.C. 106(g), 40113, 44701.

Sec.  39.13  [Amended]

0
2. The FAA amends Sec.  39.13 by adding the following new airworthiness
directive (AD):

2015-13-01 ATR-GIE Avions de Transport R[eacute]gional: Amendment
39-18188. Docket

No. FAA-2015-1986; Directorate Identifier 2012-NM-100-AD.

(a) Effective Date

    This AD becomes effective July 13, 2015.

(b) Affected ADs

    None.

(c) Applicability

    This AD applies to airplanes specified in paragraphs (c)(1) and
(c)(2) of this AD, certificated in any category.
    (1) ATR-GIE Avions de Transport R[eacute]gional Model ATR42-500
airplanes having manufacturer serial number (MSN) 671 through 815
inclusive, except MSN 811.
    (2) ATR-GIE Avions de Transport R[eacute]gional Model ATR72-212A
airplanes having MSN 769 through 914 inclusive, except MSN 826, 905,
908, and 911.

(d) Subject

    Air Transport Association (ATA) of America Code 27, Flight
Controls.

(e) Reason

    This AD was prompted by reports of non-conformity of certain
control rods, which could result in failure of the control rods. We
are issuing this AD to detect and correct failure of an affected
control rod, which, under certain circumstances, could result in
reduced control of the airplane.

(f) Compliance

    Comply with this AD within the compliance times specified,
unless already done.

(g) Elevator Control Rod Inspection

    For airplanes identified in ATR Service Bulletin ATR42-27-0105,
Revision 01, dated August 30, 2011; or ATR72-27-1066, Revision 01,
dated August 30, 2011; as applicable to airplane model: Within 6
months after the effective date of this AD, inspect all four
elevator control rods having part number (P/N) S27381930-004 and P/N
S27381831-006 for batch number identification, in accordance with
the Accomplishment Instructions of ATR Service Bulletin ATR42-27-
0105, Revision 01, dated August 30, 2011; or ATR Service Bulletin
ATR72-27-1066, Revision 01, dated August 30, 2011, as applicable to
airplane model. A review of airplane maintenance records is
acceptable in lieu of this inspection, if the batch number can be
conclusively determined from that review. Replace any affected rod,
including any rod with an unreadable batch number, at the applicable
time specified in paragraph (g)(1) or (g)(2) of this AD, in
accordance with ATR Service Bulletin ATR42-27-0105, Revision 01,
dated August 30, 2011; or ATR72-27-1066, Revision 01, dated August
30, 2011; as applicable to airplane model.
    (1) If only one rod is affected: Replace it within 10 days after
the inspection.
    (2) If two or more rods are affected: Replace all rods before
further flight, except that replacement of one of the affected rods
may be deferred for 10 days.

(h) Rudder Pedal Rod Inspection

    For airplanes identified in ATR Service Bulletin ATR42-27-0104,
Revision 01, dated August 30, 2011; or ATR Service Bulletin ATR72-
27-1065, Revision 02, dated August 30, 2011; as applicable to
airplane model: Inspect all four rudder pedal rods having P/N
S2728116400000 for batch number identification, in accordance with
the Accomplishment Instructions of ATR Service Bulletin ATR42-27-
0104, Revision 01, dated August 30, 2011; or ATR Service Bulletin
ATR72-27-1065, Revision 02, dated August 30, 2011; as applicable to
airplane model. For any affected rudder pedal rod, including any rod
with an unreadable batch number, before further flight, check the
rod diameter using a special tool, in accordance with ATR Service
Bulletin ATR42-27-0104, Revision 01, dated August 30, 2011; or ATR
Service Bulletin ATR72-27-1065, Revision 02, dated August 30, 2011;
as applicable to airplane model.
    (1) If, during the diameter check, the rod passes through the
tool, replace the rod before further flight.
    (2) If, during the diameter check, the rod does not pass through
the tool, replace the rod within 5,000 flight hours after the
diameter check.

(i) Rudder Tab Control Rod Inspection

    For airplanes identified in paragraph (c) of this AD, except for
airplanes having MSNs 671, 673, and 769 through 784 inclusive:
Within 24 months after the effective date of this AD, inspect the
rudder tab control rod P/N S27281929-002 for batch number
identification, using a method approved by the Manager,
International Branch, ANM-116, Transport Airplane Directorate, FAA;
or the European Aviation Safety Agency (EASA); or Avions de
Transport R[eacute]gional (ATR)'s EASA Design Organization Approval
(DOA). If the rudder tab control rod belongs to batch number 2107267
or 2120855, or if the batch number is unreadable: Before further
flight, replace the rod with a serviceable rod using a method
approved by the Manager, International Branch, ANM-116, Transport
Airplane Directorate, FAA; or EASA; or ATR's EASA DOA.
    Note 1 to paragraph (i) of this AD: ATR 42/72 Aircraft
Maintenance Manual (AMM)/Job Instruction Cards (JIC) 27-20-00 DVI
1000 and AMM/JIC 27-21-42 RAI 10000 are additional sources of
guidance for accomplishment of the rudder tab control rod
inspection.

 (j) Reporting Requirement

    Submit a report of the rod inspection and check required by
paragraphs (g) and (h) of this AD at the applicable compliance time
specified in paragraph (j)(1) of this AD, in accordance with the
instructions specified in paragraph (j)(2) of this AD.
    (1) Submit the report at the applicable time specified in
paragraph (j)(1)(i) or (j)(1)(ii) of this AD.
    (i) If the inspection or check was done on or after the
effective date of this AD: Submit the report within 30 days after
the inspection or check.
    (ii) If the inspection or check was done before the effective
date of this AD: Submit the report within 30 days after the
effective date of this AD.
    (2) Submit the report (including no findings) to ATR using the
Accomplishment Report form provided in the service information
identified in paragraph (j)(2)(i), (j)(2)(ii), (j)(2)(iii), or
(j)(2)(iv) of this AD; as applicable to airplane model.
    (i) ATR Service Bulletin ATR42-27-0104, Revision 01, dated
August 30, 2011.
    (ii) ATR Service Bulletin ATR42-27-0105, Revision 01, dated
August 30, 2011.
    (iii) ATR Service Bulletin ATR72-27-1065, Revision 02, dated
August 30, 2011.
    (iv) ATR Service Bulletin ATR72-27-1066, Revision 01, dated
August 30, 2011.
    (3) Send the report to ATR-GIE Avions de Transport
R[eacute]gional, 1, All[eacute]e Pierre Nadot, 31712 Blagnac Cedex,
France; telephone +33 (0) 5 62 21 62 21; fax +33 (0) 5 62 21 67 18;
email<EMAIL_ADDRESS>
(k) Credit for Previous Actions

    This paragraph provides credit for the actions required by
paragraphs (g) and (h) of this AD, if those actions were performed
before the effective date of this AD using the applicable service
information specified in paragraphs (k)(1) through (k)(5) of this
AD. These documents are not incorporated by reference in this AD.
    (1) ATR Service Bulletin ATR42-27-0104, dated December 17, 2010.
    (2) ATR Service Bulletin ATR42-27-0105, dated February 17, 2011.
    (3) ATR Service Bulletin ATR72-27-1065, dated April 15, 2010.
    (4) ATR Service Bulletin ATR72-27-1065, Revision 01, dated
December 17, 2010.
    (5) ATR Service Bulletin ATR72-27-1066, dated February 17, 2011.

(l) Other FAA AD Provisions

    The following provisions also apply to this AD:
    (1) Alternative Methods of Compliance (AMOCs): The Manager,
International Branch, ANM-116, FAA, has the authority to approve
AMOCs for this AD, if requested using the procedures found in 14 CFR
39.19. In accordance with 14 CFR 39.19, send your request to your
principal inspector or local Flight Standards District Office, as
appropriate. If sending information directly to the International
Branch, send it to ATTN: Tom Rodriguez, Aerospace Engineer,
International Branch, ANM-116, Transport Airplane Directorate, FAA,
1601 Lind Avenue SW., Renton, WA 98057-3356; telephone<PHONE_NUMBER>;
fax<PHONE_NUMBER>. Information may be emailed to<EMAIL_ADDRESS>Before using any approved AMOC, notify your
appropriate principal inspector, or lacking a principal inspector,
the Manager of the local flight standards district office/
certificate holding district office. The AMOC approval letter must
specifically reference this AD.
    (2) Contacting the Manufacturer: For any requirement in this AD
to obtain corrective actions from a manufacturer, the action must be
accomplished using a method approved by the Manager, International
Branch, ANM-116, Transport Airplane Directorate, FAA; or the
European Aviation Safety Agency (EASA); or ATR-GIE Avions de
Transport R[eacute]gional's EASA Design Organization Approval (DOA).
If approved by the DOA, the approval must include the DOA-authorized
signature.

    (3) Reporting Requirements: A federal agency may not conduct or
sponsor, and a person is not required to respond to, nor shall a
person be subject to a penalty for failure to comply with a
collection of information subject to the requirements of the
Paperwork Reduction Act unless that collection of information
displays a current valid OMB Control Number. The OMB Control Number
for this information collection is 2120-0056. Public reporting for
this collection of information is estimated to be approximately 5
minutes per response, including the time for reviewing instructions,
completing and reviewing the collection of information. All
responses to this collection of information are mandatory. Comments
concerning the accuracy of this burden and suggestions for reducing
the burden should be directed to the FAA at: 800 Independence Ave.
SW., Washington, DC 20591, Attn: Information Collection Clearance
Officer, AES-200.

(m) Related Information

    (1) Refer to Mandatory Continuing Airworthiness Information
(MCAI) EASA Airworthiness Directive 2012-0064, dated April 20, 2012,
for related information. You may examine the MCAI on the Internet at
http://www.regulations.gov by searching for and locating Docket No.
FAA-2015-1986.
    (2) Service information identified in this AD that is not
incorporated by reference is available at the addresses specified in
paragraphs (n)(3) and (n)(4) of this AD.

(n) Material Incorporated by Reference

    (1) The Director of the Federal Register approved the
incorporation by reference (IBR) of the service information listed
in this paragraph under 5 U.S.C. 552(a) and 1 CFR part 51.
    (2) You must use this service information as applicable to do
the actions required by this AD, unless this AD specifies otherwise.
    (i) ATR Service Bulletin ATR42-27-0104, Revision 01, dated
August 30, 2011.
    (ii) ATR Service Bulletin ATR42-27-0105, Revision 01, dated
August 30, 2011.
    (iii) ATR Service Bulletin ATR72-27-1065, Revision 02, dated
August 30, 2011.
    (iv) ATR Service Bulletin ATR72-27-1066, Revision 01, dated
August 30, 2011.
    (3) For service information identified in this AD, contact ATR-
GIE Avions de Transport R[eacute]gional, 1, All[eacute]e Pierre
Nadot, 31712 Blagnac Cedex, France; telephone +33 (0) 5 62 21 62 21;
fax +33 (0) 5 62 21 67 18; email<EMAIL_ADDRESS>
Internet http://www.aerochain.com.
    (4) You may view this service information at the FAA, Transport
Airplane Directorate, 1601 Lind Avenue SW., Renton, WA. For
information on the availability of this material at the FAA, call
425-227-1221.
    (5) You may view this service information that is incorporated
by reference at the National Archives and Records Administration
(NARA). For information on the availability of this material at
NARA, call<PHONE_NUMBER>, or go to: http://www.archives.gov/federal-register/cfr/ibr-locations.html.

    Issued in Renton, Washington, on June 17, 2015.
Michael Kaszycki,
Acting Manager, Transport Airplane Directorate, Aircraft Certification
Service.
[FR Doc. 2015-15615 Filed 6-25-15; 8:45 am]
 BILLING CODE 4910-13-P