[Federal Register: December 19, 2005 (Volume 70, Number 242)]
[Notices]
[Page 75172-75173]
[DOCID:fr19de05-53]

=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY

[EPA-HQ-RCRA-2005-0009; FRL-8009-7]

Agency Information Collection Activities; Submission to OMB for
Review and Approval; Comment Request; Used Oil Management Standards
Recordkeeping and Reporting Requirements (Renewal), EPA ICR Number
1286.07, OMB Control Number 2050-0124

AGENCY: Environmental Protection Agency (EPA).

ACTION: Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: In compliance with the Paperwork Reduction Act (44 U.S.C. 3501
et seq.), this document announces that an Information Collection
Request (ICR) has been forwarded to the Office of Management and Budget
(OMB) for review and approval. This is a request to renew an existing
approved collection. This ICR is scheduled to expire on December 31,
2005. Under OMB regulations, the Agency may continue to conduct or
sponsor the collection of information while this submission is pending
at OMB. This ICR describes the nature of the information collection and
its estimated burden and cost.

DATES: Additional comments may be submitted on or before January 18,
2006.

ADDRESSES: Submit your comments, referencing docket ID number EPA-HQ-
RCRA-2005-0009, to (1) EPA online using http://www.regulations.gov (our preferred method), by e-mail to<EMAIL_ADDRESS>or by mail to: EPA

Docket Center, Environmental Protection Agency, RCRA Docket, Mail Code
5305T, 1200 Pennsylvania Ave., NW., Washington, DC 20460, and (2) OMB
at: Office of Information and Regulatory Affairs, Office of Management
and Budget (OMB), Attention: Desk Officer for EPA, 725 17th Street,
NW., Washington, DC 20503.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Michael Svizzero, Office of Solid
Waste, Mail Code 5303W, Environmental Protection Agency, 1200
Pennsylvania Ave., NW., Washington, DC 20460; telephone number: 703-
308-0046; fax number:<PHONE_NUMBER>; e-mail address:
<EMAIL_ADDRESS>

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: EPA has submitted the following ICR to OMB
for review and approval according to the procedures prescribed in 5 CFR
1320.12. On July 21, 2005 (70 FR 42060), EPA sought comments on this
ICR pursuant to 5 CFR 1320.8(d). EPA received no comments.

    EPA has established a public docket for this ICR under Docket ID
No. EPA-HQ-RCRA-2005-0009, which is available for public viewing at the
RCRA Docket in the EPA Docket Center (EPA/DC), EPA West, Room B102,
1301 Constitution Ave., NW., Washington, DC. The EPA Docket Center
Public Reading Room is open from 8:30 a.m. to 4:30 p.m., Monday through
Friday, excluding legal holidays. The telephone number for the Reading
Room is<PHONE_NUMBER>, and the telephone number for the RCRA Docket is
(202) 566-0270. An electronic version of the public docket is available
at http://www.regulations.gov Use http://www.regulations.gov. to submit
or view public comments, access the index listing of the contents of
the public docket, and to access those documents in the public docket
that are available electronically. Once in the system, select
``search,'' then key in the docket ID number identified above.
    Any comments related to this ICR should be submitted to EPA and OMB
within 30 days of this notice. EPA's policy is that public comments,
whether submitted electronically or in paper, will be made available
for public viewing in http://www.regulations.gov as EPA receives them

and without change, unless the comment contains copyrighted material,
CBI, or other information whose public disclosure is restricted by
statute. When EPA identifies a comment containing copyrighted material,
EPA will provide a reference to that material in the version of the
comment that is placed in http://www.regulations.gov. The entire

printed comment, including the copyrighted material, will be available
in the public docket. Although identified as an item in the official
docket, information claimed as CBI, or whose disclosure is otherwise
restricted by statute, is not included in the official public docket,
and will not be available for public viewing in http://www.regulations.gov.
 For further information about the electronic

docket go to http://www.regulations.gov.

    Title: Used Oil Management Standards Recordkeeping and Reporting
Requirements (Renewal).
    Abstract: The Used Oil Management Standards, which include
information collection requests, were developed in accordance with
section 3014 of the Resource Conservation and Recovery Act (RCRA), as
amended by the Hazardous and Solid Waste Amendments of 1984 (HSWA),
which directs EPA to ``promulgate regulations * * * as may be necessary
to protect public health and the environment from the hazards
associated with recycled oil'' and, at the same time, to not discourage
used oil recycling. In 1985 and 1992, EPA established mandatory
regulations that govern the management of used oil (see 40 CFR part
279). To document and ensure proper handling of used oil, these
regulations establish notification, testing, tracking and recordkeeping
requirements for used oil transporters, processors, re-refiners,
marketers, and burners. They also set standards for the prevention and
cleanup of releases to the environment during storage and transit, and
for the safe closure of storage units and processing and re-refining
facilities to mitigate future releases and damages. EPA believes these
requirements minimize potential hazards to human health and the
environment from the potential mismanagement of used oil by used oil
handlers, while providing for the safe recycling of used oil.
Information from these information collection requirements is used to
ensure compliance with the Used Oil Management Standards.
    An agency may not conduct or sponsor, and a person is not required
to respond to, a collection of information unless it displays a
currently valid OMB control number. The OMB control numbers for EPA's
regulations in 40 CFR are listed in 40 CFR part 9 and are identified on
the form and/or instrument, if applicable.
    Burden Statement: The annual public reporting and recordkeeping
burden for this collection of information is estimated to range from 6
minutes to 23 hours per response. Burden means the total time, effort,
or financial resources expended by persons to generate, maintain,
retain, or disclose or provide information to or for a Federal agency.
This includes the time needed to review instructions; develop, acquire,
install, and utilize technology and systems for the purposes of
collecting, validating, and verifying information, processing and
maintaining information, and disclosing and providing information;
adjust the existing ways to comply with any previously applicable
instructions and requirements; train personnel to be able to respond to
a collection of information; search data sources; complete and review
the collection of information; and transmit or otherwise disclose the
information.
    Respondents/Affected Entities: Entities potentially affected by
this action are Business or other for profit.
    Estimated Number of Respondents: 1,640.
    Frequency of Response: Biennially.
    Estimated Total Annual Hour Burden: 460,286.
    Estimated Total Annual Cost: $22,478,000, which includes $0
annualized startup/capital costs, $10,011,000 annual O&M costs and
$12,467,000 annual labor costs.
    There is no change in the burden estimates for this ICR.

    Dated: December 12, 2005.
Oscar Morales,
Director, Collection Strategies Division.
 [FR Doc. E5-7498 Filed 12-16-05; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 6560-50-P


[Federal Register Volume 87, Number 232 (Monday, December 5, 2022)]
[Notices]
[Page 74418]
[FR Doc No: 2022-26362]

=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY

[FRL-10261-01-OMS]

Senior Executive Service Performance Review Board; Membership

AGENCY: U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA).

ACTION: Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: Notice is hereby given of the membership of the U.S.
Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) Performance Review Board for
2022.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Lizabeth Engebretson, Deputy Director,
Policy, Planning & Training Division, 3606R, Office of Human Resources,
Office of Mission Support, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, 1300
Pennsylvania Avenue NW, Washington, DC 20460.<PHONE_NUMBER>.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Section 4314(c)(1) through (5) of title 5,
U.S.C., requires each agency to establish in accordance with
regulations prescribed by the Office of Personnel Management, one or
more SES performance review boards. This board shall review and
evaluate the initial appraisal of a senior executive's performance by
the supervisor, along with any recommendations to the appointment
authority relative to the performance of the senior executive. Members
of the 2022 EPA Performance Review Board are:

Tom Brennan, Director, Science Advisory Board, Office of the
Administrator;
Jeffrey Dawson, Senior Science Advisor, Office of Chemical Safety
and Pollution Prevention;
Rafael Deleon, Principal Deputy Assistant Administrator, Office of
International and Tribal Affairs;
Kerry Drake, Mission Support Division Director, Region 9;
Lizabeth Engebretson, (Ex-Officio) Deputy Director, Policy, Planning
and Training Division, Office of Human Resources, Office of Mission
Support;
Diana Esher, Deputy Regional Administrator, Region 3;
Vanessa ``Kay'' Holt, Deputy Director for Management, Center for
Public Health & Environmental Assessment, Office of Research and
Development;
Meshell Jones-Peeler, Controller, Office of the Chief Financial
Officer;
Juan Carlos Hunt, Director, Office of Civil Rights, Office of the
Administrator;
Samantha Jones, Associate Director for Risk Assessment, Center for
Public Health and Environmental Assessment, Office of Research and
Development;
Mara J. Kamen, (Ex-Officio) Director, Office of Human Resources,
Office of Mission Support;
Arnold Layne, Deputy Director for Management, Office of Pesticide
Programs, Office of Chemical Safety and Pollution Prevention;
Pamela Legare, Director, Office of Acquisition Management, Office of
Mission Support;
David Lloyd, Director, Office of Brownfields and Land
Revitalization, Office of Land and Emergency Management;
James McDonald, Mission Support Division Director, Region 6;
Karen McGuire, Director, Enforcement & Compliance Assurance
Division, Region 1;
Mary Ross, Director, Office of Science Advisor, Policy & Engagement,
Office of Research and Development;
Kenneth Schefski, Regional Counsel--Region 8, Office of Enforcement
and Compliance Assurance;
Gautam Srinivasan, Associate General Counsel, Air and Radiation Law
Office, Office of General Counsel;
Thomas Wall, Director, Watershed Restoration, Assessment and
Protection Division, Office of Water;
Richard ``Chet'' Wayland, Director of the Air Quality Assessment
Division, Office of Air Quality Planning and Standards, Office of
Air and Radiation.

    Dated: November 21, 2022.
Mara J. Kamen,
EPA Deputy Chief Human Capital Officer and Director, Office of Human
Resources, Office of Mission Support.
[FR Doc. 2022-26362 Filed 12-2-22; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6560-50-P


Janet Cakir/RTP/USEPA/US

01/18/2008 04:57 PM

To

"King, Heidi R."<EMAIL_ADDRESS>
cc

Al McGartland/DC/USEPA/US@EPA, Bryan Hubbell/RTP/USEPA/US@EPA, Douglas
Solomon/RTP/USEPA/US@EPA, Erika Sasser/RTP/USEPA/US@EPA, Janet
Cakir/RTP/USEPA/US@EPA, Ken Adler/DC/USEPA/US@EPA, Kevin
Culligan/DC/USEPA/US@EPA, Rob Brenner/DC/USEPA/US@EPA, Ron
Evans/RTP/USEPA/US@EPA, Rosalina Rodriguez/RTP/USEPA/US@EPA, Scott
Mathias/RTP/USEPA/US@EPA, Tyler Fox/RTP/USEPA/US@EPA, Lydia
Wegman/RTP/USEPA/US@EPA, Allen Basala/RTP/USEPA/US@EPA, Amy
Lamson/RTP/USEPA/US@EPA, Charles Fulcher/RTP/USEPA/US@EPA, Cynthia
Morgan/DC/USEPA/US@EPA, Darryl Weatherhead/RTP/USEPA/US@EPA, David
Misenheimer/RTP/USEPA/US@EPA, Elizabeth Kopits/DC/USEPA/US@EPA, Jim
Ketcham-Colwill/DC/USEPA/US@EPA, Ken Davidson/DC/USEPA/US@EPA, Larry
Sorrels/RTP/USEPA/US@EPA, Lillian Bradley/RTP/USEPA/US@EPA, Mark
Corrales/DC/USEPA/US@EPA, Nathalie Simon/DC/USEPA/US@EPA, Neal
Fann/RTP/USEPA/US@EPA, Norm Possiel/RTP/USEPA/US@EPA, Pat
Dolwick/RTP/USEPA/US@EPA, Rich Mason/RTP/USEPA/US@EPA, Serpil
Kayin/DC/USEPA/US@EPA, Margaret Zawacki/AA/USEPA/US@EPA

Subject

Final Ozone NAAQS RIA Draft 1 for your review

Hi Heidi,

     Attached are the first three chapters for a first draft review of
the Final Ozone NAAQS RIA.  More chapters will follow in subsequent
emails.  This draft does not include extrapolated cost numbers or
benefit numbers, but we've made every effort to get to you something as
complete as possible to review while we wrap up the work for these
sections.  Below is a table of contents to give you a big-picture
overview of the structure of the document.  We started by editing the
Proposal document and have "tracked changes" in MS Word.    You will see
all of our deletions and additions from proposal when you open the word
documents.  If you want to view a clean version without the changes
highlighted, from the MS Word menu, go to "view" and "markup".  This
toggles between visible and hidden changes.  We were hoping that
tracking our changes would help to streamline your review efforts.  Let
us know if you liked this approach and let me know if you have any
trouble with the files.  I also want to add one caveat.  We've added
some chapters, so there may be some references within the document that
don't call-out the right chapter number.  We are working to fix these
and will have it resolved prior to the next draft.

Thanks,

Janet

TABLE OF CONTENTS:

Executive Summary

Table of Contents

Ch. 1	Introduction and Background

Ch. 2 	Characterizing Ozone and Modeling Tools Used in This Analysis

Ch. 3	Modeled Control Strategy:  Design and Analytical Results

Appendix Ch. 3

Ch. 4	Approach for Estimating Reductions for Full Attainment Scenario*

Ch. 5	Control Strategy Cost Estimates

Appendix Ch. 5

Ch. 6	Economic and Social Cost Estimates

Ch. 7	Total Costs*

Ch. 8	Incremental Benefits of Attaining Alternative Ozone Standards
Relative to the Current 8-hour Standard

Appendix Ch. 8*

Ch. 9	Discussion of Ozone Secondary Standard*

Ch. 10	Conclusions and Implications of the Benefit-Cost Analysis

Ch. 11 	Statutory and Executive Order Impact Analysis*

* indicates the chapter is not provided as part of the draft 1 review.

_______________________________________

Janet F. Cakir, Ph.D.

Environmental Protection Specialist

Air Benefits Cost Group

109 TW Alexander Dr., (C439-02)

Research Triangle Park, NC 27711

Tel:<PHONE_NUMBER>

Fax:<PHONE_NUMBER>

email<EMAIL_ADDRESS>


[Federal Register Volume 84, Number 187 (Thursday, September 26, 2019)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Pages 50727-50730]
[FR Doc No: 2019-20897]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION

Federal Aviation Administration

14 CFR Part 39

[Docket No. FAA-2018-0453; Product Identifier 2018-NM-028-AD; Amendment
39-19732; AD 2019-18-05]
RIN 2120-AA64

Airworthiness Directives; De Havilland Aircraft of Canada Limited
(Type Certificate Previously Held by Bombardier, Inc.) Airplanes

AGENCY: Federal Aviation Administration (FAA), Department of
Transportation (DOT).

ACTION: Final rule.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The FAA is adopting a new airworthiness directive (AD) for
certain De Havilland Aircraft of Canada Limited (Type Certificate
Previously Held by Bombardier, Inc.) Model DHC-8-400 series airplanes.
This AD was prompted by reports of the nose landing gear (NLG) locking
in a partially extended position due to loose bushings on the lock link
of the NLG locking mechanism. This AD requires repetitive inspections
of the bushings and the lower lock link of the NLG for discrepancies,
and corrective actions if necessary. This AD also requires replacement
of the lower lock link of the NLG, which terminates the repetitive
inspections. The FAA is issuing this AD to address the unsafe condition
on these products.

DATES: This AD is effective October 31, 2019.
    The Director of the Federal Register approved the incorporation by
reference of certain publications listed in this AD as of October 31,
2019.

ADDRESSES: For service information identified in this final rule,
contact De Havilland Aircraft of Canada Ltd., Q-Series Technical Help
Desk, 123 Garratt Boulevard, Toronto, Ontario M3K 1Y5, Canada;
telephone:<PHONE_NUMBER>; fax:<PHONE_NUMBER>; email<EMAIL_ADDRESS>
internet: https://dehavilland.com. You may view this service
information at the FAA, Transport Standards Branch, 2200 South 216th
St., Des Moines, WA. For information on the availability of this
material at the FAA, call<PHONE_NUMBER>. It is also available on the
internet at http://www.regulations.gov by searching for and locating
Docket No. FAA-2018-0453.

Examining the AD Docket

    You may examine the AD docket on the internet at http://www.regulations.gov by searching for and locating Docket No. FAA-2018-
0453; or in person at Docket Operations between 9 a.m. and 5 p.m.,
Monday through Friday, except Federal holidays. The AD docket contains
this final rule, the regulatory evaluation, any comments received, and
other information. The address for Docket Operations is U.S. Department
of Transportation, Docket Operations, M-30, West Building Ground Floor,
Room W12-140, 1200 New Jersey Avenue SE, Washington, DC 20590.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Darren Gassetto, Aerospace Engineer,
Mechanical Systems and Administrative Services Section, New York ACO
Branch, FAA, 1600 Stewart Avenue, Suite 410, Westbury, NY 11590;
telephone<PHONE_NUMBER>; fax<PHONE_NUMBER>.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

Discussion

    The FAA issued a notice of proposed rulemaking (NPRM) to amend 14
CFR part 39 by adding an AD that would apply to certain Bombardier,
Inc., Model DHC-8-400 series airplanes. The NPRM published in the
Federal Register on May 30, 2018 (83 FR 24694). The NPRM was prompted
by reports of the NLG locking in a partially extended position due to
loose bushings on the lock link of the NLG locking mechanism. The NPRM
proposed to require inspecting the bushings and the lower lock link of
the NLG for discrepancies, and corrective actions if necessary.
    The FAA issued a supplemental notice of proposed rulemaking (SNPRM)
to amend 14 CFR part 39 by adding an AD that would apply to certain
Bombardier, Inc., Model DHC-8-400 series airplanes. The SNPRM published
in the Federal Register on June 7, 2019 (84 FR 26601). The FAA issued
the SNPRM to add a requirement to replace the lower lock link of the
NLG, which would terminate the repetitive inspections proposed in the
NPRM. The SNPRM also proposed to reduce the applicability in the NPRM.
    The FAA is issuing this AD to address excessive free play at the
lock link of the NLG locking mechanism, and consequent inability to
fully retract or deploy the NLG, which could result in collapse of the
NLG and affect the safe landing of the airplane.
    Transport Canada Civil Aviation (TCCA), which is the aviation
authority for Canada, has issued Canadian AD CF-2018-01R1, dated
January 21, 2019 (referred to after this as the Mandatory Continuing
Airworthiness Information, or ``the MCAI''), to correct an unsafe

condition for certain De Havilland Aircraft of Canada Limited (Type
Certificate Previously Held by Bombardier, Inc.) Model DHC-8-400 series
airplanes. The MCAI states:

    A landing incident took place whereby the aeroplane's nose
landing gear (NLG) was locked in a partially-extended position,
leading to gear collapse upon NLG touch down. The investigation
revealed that the NLG was locked in this position due to the
bushings on the lock link of the NLG locking mechanism becoming
loose. This condition was present due to insufficient interference
fit which resulted in some bushing outer diameter wear and fretting.
A dislodged bushing will also cause the bushing sealant to break.
Broken sealant allows moisture ingress and corrosion that can
accelerate free play buildup. Excessive free play at the lock link
can result in the inability to fully retract or deploy the NLG,
resulting in a risk of NLG collapse on landing.
    Bombardier Inc. has developed an inspection to identify and
correct this condition. The original version of this [Canadian] AD
required a repetitive inspection [to detect discrepancies] and
corrective actions based on the inspection findings.
    Revision 1 of this [Canadian] AD is issued to modify the NLG
with a lower lock with improved bushing retention and greasing
provisions. Implementing this modification is a terminating action
to this [Canadian] AD. The modification has been introduced in
production, therefore the applicability of this [Canadian] AD has
been reduced. Clarifications have also been made to the retained
text of the original version.

    You may examine the MCAI in the AD docket on the internet at http://www.regulations.gov by searching for and locating Docket No. FAA-2018-
0453.

Comments

    The FAA gave the public the opportunity to participate in
developing this final rule. The following presents the comments
received on the SNPRM and the FAA's response to each comment.

Request To Revise Certain Requirements

    Horizon Air asked that the requirement to do the actions specified
in paragraph (k) of the proposed AD in accordance with paragraph 3.A.
of the Accomplishment Instructions of Bombardier Service Bulletin 84-
32-154, Revision A, dated November 21, 2018, be removed. Horizon Air
stated that the job setup specified in paragraph 3.A. of the referenced
service information does not directly correct the unsafe condition.
Horizon Air would like only the actions specified in paragraph 3.B. of
the referenced service information mandated.
    The FAA does not agree with the commenter's request. For some ADs,
the job setup actions in the associated service information do not
affect the actions to correct the unsafe condition. However, for this
AD, the FAA has determined that to adequately perform the corrective
actions the job setup actions specified in Bombardier Service Bulletin
84-32-154, Revision A, dated November 21, 2018, must be accomplished.
Paragraph 3.A., ``Job Set-Up,'' of Bombardier Service Bulletin 84-32-
154, Revision A, dated November 21, 2018, includes specific procedures
for the NLG to be in the correct configuration for the corrective
actions to be done and prevent damage to the equipment. Therefore, the
FAA has not changed this AD in this regard.

Request To Install Post-UTC Aerospace Systems Spare Parts

    Horizon Air asked that installation of NLG drag strut assemblies
having part number 47300-7A, 47300-9A, or 47300-11A, serviced in
accordance with UTC Aerospace Systems Vendor Service Bulletin (VSB)
47300-32-138 R3, be allowed as terminating action for the repetitive
inspections. Horizon Air stated that UTC Aerospace Systems VSB 47300-
32-138 R3 can be done on units not installed on the airplane.
    The FAA agrees to clarify. NLG drag strut assemblies can be
serviced (lower lock links replaced and affected parts re-identified)
by accomplishing UTC Aerospace Systems VSB 47300-32-138 R3, as
specified in Bombardier Service Bulletin 84-32-154, Revision A, dated
November 21, 2018. However, operators must still show compliance with
paragraph 3.A. and Steps 3.B.(1), 3.B.(4) and 3.B.(5) of the
Accomplishment Instructions of Bombardier Service Bulletin 84-32-154,
Revision A, dated November 21, 2018, for the removal of a unit which
has not been serviced, and installation of a serviced spare unit, in
order to correct the unsafe condition. In addition, paragraph (f) of
this AD specifies ``Comply with this AD within the compliance times
specified, unless already done.'' Therefore, if some of the corrective
actions have been done, only the remaining corrective actions must be
completed to comply with this AD. The FAA has not changed this AD in
this regard.

Explanation of Change Made to This Final Rule

    The FAA has revised this final rule to identify the legal name of
the manufacturer as published in the most recent type certificate data
sheet for the affected airplane models.

Conclusion

    The FAA reviewed the relevant data, considered the comments
received, and determined that air safety and the public interest
require adopting this final rule as proposed, except for minor
editorial changes. The FAA has determined that these minor changes:
     Are consistent with the intent that was proposed in the
SNPRM for addressing the unsafe condition; and
     Do not add any additional burden upon the public than was
already proposed in the SNPRM.

Related Service Information Under 1 CFR Part 51

    Bombardier has issued the following service information:
     Service Bulletin 84-32-153, Revision A, dated February 27,
2018, which describes procedures for general visual inspections of the
bushings and the lower lock link of the NLG for discrepancies. The
service information also describes procedures for repair or replacement
of the lock link if any discrepancy is found.
     Service Bulletin 84-32-154, Revision A, dated November 21,
2018, which describes procedures for replacement of the existing lock
link with a new lock link.
    This service information is reasonably available because the
interested parties have access to it through their normal course of
business or by the means identified in the ADDRESSES section.

Costs of Compliance

    The FAA estimates that this AD affects 64 airplanes of U.S.
registry.
    The FAA estimates the following costs to comply with this AD:

                                      Estimated Costs for Required Actions
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
                                                                                Cost on U.S.
           Action                  Labor cost         Parts cost       Cost per product          operators
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Inspection.................  2 work-hours x $85                 $0  $170 per inspection    $10,880 per
                              per hour = $170 per                    cycle.                 inspection cycle.
                              inspection cycle.

Replacement................  6 work-hours x $85              5,923  $6,433...............  $411,712
                              per hour = $510.
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

    The FAA has received no definitive data that enables the agency to
provide cost estimates for the on-condition actions specified in this
AD.

Authority for This Rulemaking

    Title 49 of the United States Code specifies the FAA's authority to
issue rules on aviation safety. Subtitle I, section 106, describes the
authority of the FAA Administrator. Subtitle VII: Aviation Programs,
describes in more detail the scope of the Agency's authority.
    The FAA is issuing this rulemaking under the authority described in
Subtitle VII, Part A, Subpart III, Section 44701: ``General
requirements.'' Under that section, Congress charges the FAA with
promoting safe flight of civil aircraft in air commerce by prescribing
regulations for practices, methods, and procedures the Administrator
finds necessary for safety in air commerce. This regulation is within
the scope of that authority because it addresses an unsafe condition
that is likely to exist or develop on products identified in this
rulemaking action.
    This AD is issued in accordance with authority delegated by the
Executive Director, Aircraft Certification Service, as authorized by
FAA Order 8000.51C. In accordance with that order, issuance of ADs is
normally a function of the Compliance and Airworthiness Division, but
during this transition period, the Executive Director has delegated the
authority to issue ADs applicable to transport category airplanes and
associated appliances to the Director of the System Oversight Division.

Regulatory Findings

    This AD will not have federalism implications under Executive Order
13132. This AD will not have a substantial direct effect on the States,
on the relationship between the national government and the States, or
on the distribution of power and responsibilities among the various
levels of government.
    For the reasons discussed above, I certify that this AD:
    (1) Is not a ``significant regulatory action'' under Executive
Order 12866,
    (2) Will not affect intrastate aviation in Alaska, and
    (3) Will not have a significant economic impact, positive or
negative, on a substantial number of small entities under the criteria
of the Regulatory Flexibility Act.

List of Subjects in 14 CFR Part 39

    Air transportation, Aircraft, Aviation safety, Incorporation by
reference, Safety.

Adoption of the Amendment

    Accordingly, under the authority delegated to me by the
Administrator, the FAA amends 14 CFR part 39 as follows:

PART 39--AIRWORTHINESS DIRECTIVES

0
1. The authority citation for part 39 continues to read as follows:

    Authority: 49 U.S.C. 106(g), 40113, 44701.

Sec.  39.13  [Amended]

0
2. The FAA amends Sec.  39.13 by adding the following new airworthiness
directive (AD):

2019-18-05 De Havilland Aircraft of Canada Limited (Type Certificate
Previously Held by Bombardier, Inc.): Amendment 39-19732; Docket No.
FAA-2018-0453; Product Identifier 2018-NM-028-AD.

(a) Effective Date

    This AD is effective October 31, 2019.

(b) Affected ADs

    None.

(c) Applicability

    This AD applies to De Havilland Aircraft of Canada Limited (Type
Certificate Previously Held by Bombardier, Inc.) Model DHC-8-400, -
401, and -402 airplanes, certificated in any category, serial
numbers 4001 through 4585 inclusive, and 4587.

(d) Subject

    Air Transport Association (ATA) of America Code 32, Landing
gear.

(e) Reason

    This AD was prompted by reports of the nose landing gear (NLG)
locking in a partially extended position due to loose bushings on a
lock link of the NLG locking mechanism. The FAA is issuing this AD
to address excessive free play at the lock link of the NLG locking
mechanism, and consequent inability to fully retract or deploy the
NLG, which could result in collapse of the NLG and affect the safe
landing of the airplane.

(f) Compliance

    Comply with this AD within the compliance times specified,
unless already done.

(g) Repetitive Inspections and Corrective Actions

    Except as provided by paragraphs (h) and (i) of this AD: Do a
general visual inspection for the NLG lower lock link part number
and discrepancies of the bushings and of the lower lock link of the
NLG locking mechanism, at the applicable time specified in paragraph
(g)(1) or (2) of this AD, in accordance with paragraphs 3.A. and
3.B., or 3.A. and 3.D., as applicable, of the Accomplishment
Instructions of Bombardier Service Bulletin 84-32-153, Revision A,
dated February 27, 2018. If any discrepancy is found, before further
flight, repair or replace the NLG lower lock link, as applicable, in
accordance with paragraphs 3.B. or 3.D, as applicable, of Bombardier
Service Bulletin 84-32-153, Revision A, dated February 27, 2018.
Repeat the inspection thereafter at intervals not to exceed 1,600
flight cycles on any NLG lower lock link.
    (1) For airplanes on which an NLG lower lock link has
accumulated 7,200 or fewer total flight cycles as of the effective
date of this AD: Before the accumulation of 8,000 total flight
cycles on the NLG lower lock link.
    (2) For airplanes on which an NLG lower lock link has
accumulated more than 7,200 total flight cycles as of the effective
date of this AD: Within 800 flight cycles on the NLG lower lock link
after the effective date of this AD.

(h) Inspections After Repair or Replacement of NLG Lower Lock Link

    For airplanes with an NLG lower lock link that is repaired or
replaced as specified in any one of paragraphs (h)(1) through (4) of
this AD: The next inspection specified by paragraph (g) of this AD
is required for the NLG lower lock link on the airplane at the
applicable time specified in figure 1 to the introductory text of
paragraph (h) of this AD.

Figure 1 to the Introductory Text of Paragraph (h)--Compliance Times for
       Next Inspection on Repaired or Replaced NLG Lower Lock Link
------------------------------------------------------------------------
             Flight cycles                       Compliance time
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Airplanes on which the NLG lower lock    Before the accumulation of
 link has accumulated 7,200 or fewer      8,000 flight cycles on the NLG
 flight cycles since the NLG lower link   lower lock link since the
 was repaired or replaced.                repair or replacement.
Airplanes on which the NLG lower lock    Within 800 flight cycles on the
 link has accumulated more than 7,200     NLG lower lock link after the
 flight cycles since the NLG lower link   effective date of this AD.
 was repaired or replaced.
------------------------------------------------------------------------

    (1) Repaired as specified in Bombardier Repair Drawing 8/4-32-
0338;
    (2) Repaired as specified in the Goodrich Aerospace Canada Ltd.
Component Maintenance Manual, Part Number (P/N) 47300, 32-21-03;
    (3) Replaced with a serviceable lock link having P/N 47324-1
(SCR-093-17-B); or
    (4) Replaced with a new lock link having P/N 47324-1.

(i) Lock Link Excepted From Inspection Requirements

    The inspections specified in this AD are not required for any
new NLG lower lock link having P/N 47324-3.

(j) Credit for Previous Actions

    This paragraph provides credit for actions required by paragraph
(g) of this AD, if those actions were performed before the effective
date of this AD using Bombardier Service Bulletin 84-32-153, dated
September 22, 2017, provided all drag strut joints were greased, as
specified in paragraphs 3.B.(1)(h) and 3.D.(1)(c)5 of the
Accomplishment Instructions of this service information, using
aircraft maintenance manual (AMM) Task 12-20-01-640-802.

(k) Terminating Action for Repetitive Inspections

    Within 8,000 flight cycles or 48 months on the NLG lower lock
link after the effective date of this AD, whichever occurs first:
Replace the existing NLG lower lock link with a new lower lock link
having P/N 47324-3, in accordance with paragraphs 3.A. and 3.B. of
the Accomplishment Instructions of Bombardier Service Bulletin 84-
32-154, Revision A, dated November 21, 2018. Replacement of the
lower lock link on the NLG terminates the repetitive inspections
required by paragraphs (g) and (h) of this AD for that airplane.

(l) Other FAA AD Provisions

    The following provisions also apply to this AD:
    (1) Alternative Methods of Compliance (AMOCs): The Manager, New
York ACO Branch, FAA, has the authority to approve AMOCs for this
AD, if requested using the procedures found in 14 CFR 39.19. In
accordance with 14 CFR 39.19, send your request to your principal
inspector or local Flight Standards District Office, as appropriate.
If sending information directly to the manager of the New York ACO
Branch, send it to ATTN: Program Manager, Continuing Operational
Safety, FAA, New York ACO Branch, 1600 Stewart Avenue, Suite 410,
Westbury, NY 11590; telephone<PHONE_NUMBER>; fax<PHONE_NUMBER>. Before
using any approved AMOC, notify your appropriate principal
inspector, or lacking a principal inspector, the manager of the
local flight standards district office/certificate holding district
office.
    (2) Contacting the Manufacturer: For any requirement in this AD
to obtain corrective actions from a manufacturer, the action must be
accomplished using a method approved by the Manager, New York ACO
Branch, FAA; or Transport Canada Civil Aviation (TCCA); or
Bombardier, Inc.'s TCCA Design Approval Organization (DAO). If
approved by the DAO, the approval must include the DAO-authorized
signature.

(m) Related Information

    (1) Refer to Mandatory Continuing Airworthiness Information
(MCAI) Canadian AD CF-2018-01R1, dated January 21, 2019, for related
information. This MCAI may be found in the AD docket on the internet
at http://www.regulations.gov by searching for and locating Docket
No. FAA-2018-0453.
    (2) For more information about this AD, contact Darren Gassetto,
Aerospace Engineer, Mechanical Systems and Administrative Services
Section, New York ACO Branch, FAA, 1600 Stewart Avenue, Suite 410,
Westbury, NY 11590; telephone<PHONE_NUMBER>; fax<PHONE_NUMBER>.
    (3) Service information identified in this AD that is not
incorporated by reference is available at the addresses specified in
paragraphs (n)(3) and (4) of this AD.

(n) Material Incorporated by Reference

    (1) The Director of the Federal Register approved the
incorporation by reference (IBR) of the service information listed
in this paragraph under 5 U.S.C. 552(a) and 1 CFR part 51.
    (2) You must use this service information as applicable to do
the actions required by this AD, unless this AD specifies otherwise.
    (i) Bombardier Service Bulletin 84-32-153, Revision A, dated
February 27, 2018.
    (ii) Bombardier Service Bulletin 84-32-154, Revision A, dated
November 21, 2018.
    (3) For service information identified in this AD, contact De
Havilland Aircraft of Canada Ltd., Q-Series Technical Help Desk, 123
Garratt Boulevard, Toronto, Ontario M3K 1Y5, Canada; telephone: 416-
375-4000; fax:<PHONE_NUMBER>; email<EMAIL_ADDRESS>internet:
https://devahilland.com.
    (4) You may view this service information at the FAA, Transport
Standards Branch, 2200 South 216th St., Des Moines, WA. For
information on the availability of this material at the FAA, call
206-231-3195.
    (5) You may view this service information that is incorporated
by reference at the National Archives and Records Administration
(NARA). For information on the availability of this material at
NARA, email<EMAIL_ADDRESS>or go to: http://www.archives.gov/federal-register/cfr/ibr-locations.html.;

    Issued in Des Moines, Washington, on September 9, 2019.
Michael Kaszycki,
Acting Director, System Oversight Division, Aircraft Certification
Service.
[FR Doc. 2019-20897 Filed 9-25-19; 8:45 am]
 BILLING CODE 4910-13-P


[Federal Register Volume 82, Number 108 (Wednesday, June 7, 2017)]
[Notices]
[Page 26473]
[FR Doc No: 2017-11766]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission

[Project No. 14828-000]

Merchant Hydro Developers, LLC; Notice of Preliminary Permit
Application Accepted for Filing and Soliciting Comments, Motions To
Intervene, and Competing Applications

    On January 18, 2017, Merchant Hydro Developers, LLC, filed an
application for a preliminary permit, pursuant to section 4(f) of the
Federal Power Act (FPA), proposing to study the feasibility of the
Meyersdale Pumped Storage Hydroelectric Project to be located in
Somerset County, Pennsylvania. The sole purpose of a preliminary
permit, if issued, is to grant the permit holder priority to file a
license application during the permit term. A preliminary permit does
not authorize the permit holder to perform any land-disturbing
activities or otherwise enter upon lands or waters owned by others
without the owners' express permission.
    The proposed project would consist of the following: (1) A new
upper reservoir with a surface area of 45 acres and a storage capacity
of 675 acre-feet at a surface elevation of approximately 2,790 feet
above mean sea level (msl) created through construction of a new
roller-compacted concrete or rock-filled dam and/or dike; (2)
excavating a new lower reservoir with a surface area of 30 acres and a
total storage capacity of 810 acre-feet at a surface elevation of 2,100
feet msl; (3) a new 5,500-foot-long, 48-inch-diameter penstock
connecting the upper and lower reservoirs; (4) a new 150-foot-long, 50-
foot-wide powerhouse containing two turbine-generator units with a
total rated capacity of 38 megawatts; (5) a new transmission line
connecting the powerhouse to a nearby electric grid interconnection
point at the Meyersdale Wind Farm; and (6) appurtenant facilities.
Possible initial fill water and make-up water would come from the
nearby Casselman River, including groundwater. The proposed project
would have an annual generation of 139,369 megawatt-hours.
    Applicant Contact: Adam Rousselle, Merchant Hydro Developers, LLC,
5710 Oak Crest Drive, Doylestown, PA 18902; phone:<PHONE_NUMBER>.
    FERC Contact: Monir Chowdhury; phone:<PHONE_NUMBER>.
    Deadline for filing comments, motions to intervene, competing
applications (without notices of intent), or notices of intent to file
competing applications: 60 days from the issuance of this notice.
Competing applications and notices of intent must meet the requirements
of 18 CFR 4.36.
    The Commission strongly encourages electronic filing. Please file
comments, motions to intervene, notices of intent, and competing
applications using the Commission's eFiling system at http://www.ferc.gov/docs-filing/efiling.asp. Commenters can submit brief
comments up to 6,000 characters, without prior registration, using the
eComment system at http://www.ferc.gov/docs-filing/ecomment.asp. You
must include your name and contact information at the end of your
comments. For assistance, please contact FERC Online Support at
<EMAIL_ADDRESS>(866) 208-3676 (toll free), or (202) 502-
8659 (TTY). In lieu of electronic filing, please send a paper copy to:
Secretary, Federal Energy Regulatory Commission, 888 First Street NE.,
Washington, DC 20426. The first page of any filing should include
docket number P-14828-000.
    More information about this project, including a copy of the
application, can be viewed or printed on the ``eLibrary'' link of the
Commission's Web site at http://www.ferc.gov/docs-filing/elibrary.asp.
Enter the docket number (P-14828) in the docket number field to access
the document. For assistance, contact FERC Online Support.

    Dated: June 1, 2017.
 Kimberly D. Bose,
 Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2017-11766 Filed 6-6-17; 8:45 am]
 BILLING CODE 6717-01-P


[Federal Register: June 29, 2009 (Volume 74, Number 123)]
[Notices]
[Page 31021-31022]
[DOCID:fr29jn09-44]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission

Combined Notice of Filings 1

June 22, 2009.
    Take notice that the Commission received the following electric
rate filings:

    Docket Numbers: ER99-2416-007.
    Applicants: El Paso Electric Company.
    Description: Notice of Change in Status of El Paso Electric
Company.
    Filed Date: 06/19/2009.
    Accession Number: 20090619-5108.
    Comment Date: 5 p.m. Eastern Time on Friday, July 10, 2009.

    Docket Numbers: ER08-1574-007.
    Applicants: ORNI 18, LLC.
    Description: Notice of Non-Material Change in Status of ORNI 18,
LLC.
    Filed Date: 06/19/2009.
    Accession Number: 20090619-5105.
    Comment Date: 5 p.m. Eastern Time on Friday, July 10, 2009.

    Docket Numbers: ER09-1154-001.
    Applicants: UNS Electric, Inc.
    Description: UNS Electric, Inc submits Substitute Second Revised
Sheet 90B et al. to FERC Electric Tariff, First Revised Volume 1.
    Filed Date: 06/19/2009.
    Accession Number: 20090622-0126.
    Comment Date: 5 p.m. Eastern Time on Friday, July 10, 2009.

    Docket Numbers: ER09-1218-001.
    Applicants: Carolina Power & Light Company.
    Description: Progress Energy Carolinas, Inc submits for filing a
correction to the Attachment 2 cost support for its 5/29/09 filing,
which concerns revisions to its cost of service formula rate etc.
    Filed Date: 06/15/2009.
    Accession Number: 20090619-0083.
    Comment Date: 5 p.m. Eastern Time on Monday, July 06, 2009.

    Docket Numbers: ER09-1269-001.
    Applicants: Escondido Energy Center, LLC.
    Description: Escondido Energy Center, LLC submits certain
additional information regarding EEC's upstream owner, MMC Energy, Inc.
Substitute Original Sheet 1 and 2.
    Filed Date: 06/19/2009.
    Accession Number: 20090622-0134.

    Comment Date: 5 p.m. Eastern Time on Friday, July 10, 2009.

    Docket Numbers: ER09-1270-001.
    Applicants: Chula Vista Energy Center, LLC.
    Description: Chula Vista Energy Center, LLC submits certain
additional information regarding CVEC's upstream owner, MMC Energy,
Inc, Substitute Original Sheet 1 and 2.
    Filed Date: 06/19/2009.
    Accession Number: 20090622-0135.
    Comment Date: 5 p.m. Eastern Time on Friday, July 10, 2009.

    Docket Numbers: ER09-1325-000.
    Applicants: Virginia Electric and Power Company.
    Description: Dominion Virginia Power submits Original Service
Agreement 2190 to FERC Electric Tariff, Sixth Revised Volume 1.
    Filed Date: 06/18/2009.
    Accession Number: 20090619-0131.
    Comment Date: 5 p.m. Eastern Time on Thursday, July 09, 2009.

    Docket Numbers: ER09-1326-000.
    Applicants: Southern Company Services, Inc.
    Description: Southern Companies submits a network integration
transmission service agreement under the Open Access Transmission
Tariff of Southern Companies.
    Filed Date: 06/19/2009.
    Accession Number: 20090619-0130.
    Comment Date: 5 p.m. Eastern Time on Friday, July 10, 2009.

    Docket Numbers: ER09-1327-000.
    Applicants: PJM Interconnection LLC.
    Description: PJM Interconnection, LLC submits First Revised Service
Agreement No 2020 to FERC Electric Tariff, Sixth Revised Volume 1.
    Filed Date: 06/18/2009.
    Accession Number: 20090619-0084.
    Comment Date: 5 p.m. Eastern Time on Thursday, July 09, 2009.

    Docket Numbers: ER09-1328-000.
    Applicants: Midwest Independent Transmission System.
    Description: Midwest Independent Transmission System Operator, Inc
submits executed amended and restated large generator interconnection
agreement among the Midwest ISO, Quilt Block, et al.
    Filed Date: 06/18/2009.
    Accession Number: 20090619-0136.
    Comment Date: 5 p.m. Eastern Time on Thursday, July 09, 2009.

    Docket Numbers: ER09-1331-000.
    Applicants: Tucson Electric Power Company.
    Description: Tucson Electric Power Company submits Third Revised
Sheet No 96B et al to FERC Electric Tariff, Fourth Revised Volume 2,
effective June 19, 2009.
    Filed Date: 06/19/2009.
    Accession Number: 20090622-0031.
    Comment Date: 5 p.m. Eastern Time on Friday, July 10, 2009.

    Docket Numbers: ER09-1332-000.
    Applicants: MidAmerican Energy Company.
    Description: MidAmerican Energy Company submits an agreement
governing joint ownership of facilities entitled joint Investment and
Ownership Agreement for Grimes-Granger 161kV Projects etc.
    Filed Date: 06/19/2009.
    Accession Number: 20090622-0032.
    Comment Date: 5 p.m. Eastern Time on Friday, July 10, 2009.

    Docket Numbers: ER09-1333-000.
    Applicants: PacifiCorp.
    Description: PacifiCorp submits a Large Generator Interconnection
Agreement Facilities Maintenance Agreement dated 6/9/09 to be
designated as Service Agreement 573, Seventh Revised Volume 11 etc with
PacifiCorp Energy.
    Filed Date: 06/19/2009.
    Accession Number: 20090622-0133.
    Comment Date: 5 p.m. Eastern Time on Friday, July 10, 2009.

    Docket Numbers: ER09-1334-000.
    Applicants: Midwest Independent Transmission System Operator, Inc.
    Description: Midwest Independent Transmission System Operator, Inc
submits Third Revised Agreement No 1694 et al to FERC Electric Tariff,
Fourth Revised Volume 1.
    Filed Date: 06/19/2009.
    Accession Number: 20090622-0101.
    Comment Date: 5 p.m. Eastern Time on Friday, July 10, 2009.

    Any person desiring to intervene or to protest in any of the above
proceedings must file in accordance with Rules 211 and 214 of the
Commission's Rules of Practice and Procedure (18 CFR 385.211 and
385.214) on or before 5 p.m. Eastern time on the specified comment
date. It is not necessary to separately intervene again in a subdocket
related to a compliance filing if you have previously intervened in the
same docket. Protests will be considered by the Commission in
determining the appropriate action to be taken, but will not serve to
make protestants parties to the proceeding. Anyone filing a motion to
intervene or protest must serve a copy of that document on the
Applicant. In reference to filings initiating a new proceeding,
interventions or protests submitted on or before the comment deadline
need not be served on persons other than the Applicant.
    The Commission encourages electronic submission of protests and
interventions in lieu of paper, using the FERC Online links at http://
www.ferc.gov. To facilitate electronic service, persons with Internet
access who will eFile a document and/or be listed as a contact for an
intervenor must create and validate an eRegistration account using the
eRegistration link. Select the eFiling link to log on and submit the
intervention or protests.
    Persons unable to file electronically should submit an original and
14 copies of the intervention or protest to the Federal Energy
Regulatory Commission, 888 First St. NE., Washington, DC 20426.
    The filings in the above proceedings are accessible in the
Commission's eLibrary system by clicking on the appropriate link in the
above list. They are also available for review in the Commission's
Public Reference Room in Washington, DC. There is an eSubscription link
on the Web site that enables subscribers to receive e-mail notification
when a document is added to a subscribed dockets(s). For assistance
with any FERC Online service, please e-mail<EMAIL_ADDRESS>
or call<PHONE_NUMBER> (toll free). For TTY, call<PHONE_NUMBER>.

Nathaniel J. Davis, Sr.,
Deputy Secretary.
 [FR Doc. E9-15260 Filed 6-26-09; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 6717-01-P


[Federal Register Volume 82, Number 112 (Tuesday, June 13, 2017)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Page 27011]
[FR Doc No: 2017-12217]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY

Coast Guard

33 CFR Part 165

[Docket No. USCG-2017-0374]

Safety Zone; Southern California Annual Fireworks for the San
Diego Captain of the Port Zone

AGENCY: Coast Guard, DHS.

ACTION: Notice of enforcement of regulation.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Coast Guard will enforce a safety zone for the Sea World
Fireworks on the waters of Mission Bay, CA on specific evenings from
Memorial Day to Labor Day in 2017. This safety zone is necessary to
provide for the safety of the participants, spectators, official
vessels of the events, and general users of the waterway. Our
regulation for the Southern California annual fireworks for the San
Diego Captain of the Port Zone identifies the regulated area for the
events. During the enforcement period, no spectators shall anchor,
block, loiter in, or impede the transit of official patrol vessels in
the regulated area without the approval of the Captain of the Port, or
his designated representative.

DATES: The regulations in 33 CFR 165.1123, Table 1, Item 7, will be
enforced from 8:30 p.m. through 10:30 p.m. on June 30 through July 5,
and September 1 through September 4, 2017.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: If you have questions on this
publication, call or email Lieutenant Robert Cole, Waterways
Management, U.S. Coast Guard Sector San Diego, CA; telephone 619-278-
7656, email<EMAIL_ADDRESS>
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The Coast Guard will enforce the regulations
in 33 CFR 165.1123 for a safety zone for the Sea World Fireworks on the
waters of Mission Bay, CA in 33 CFR 165.1123, Table 1, Item 7 of that
section, from 8:30 p.m. through 10:30 p.m. on specific evenings from
Memorial Day to Labor Day in 2017. This action is being taken to
provide for the safety of life on navigable waterways during the
fireworks events. Our regulation for Southern California annual
fireworks events for the San Diego Captain of the Port Zone identifies
the regulated area for the events. Under the provisions of 33 CFR
165.1123, a vessel may not enter the regulated area, unless it receives
permission from the Captain of the Port, or his designated
representative. Spectator vessels may safely transit outside the
regulated area but may not anchor, block, loiter, or impede the transit
of participants or official patrol vessels. The Coast Guard may be
assisted by other Federal, State, or Local law enforcement agencies in
enforcing this regulation.
    This document is issued under authority of 33 CFR 165.1123 and 5
U.S.C. 552(a). In addition to this document in the Federal Register,
the Coast Guard will provide the maritime community with advance
notification of this enforcement period via the Local Notice to
Mariners, a Safety Marine Information Broadcast on VHF-FM radio, and
local advertising by the event sponsor.
    If the Captain of the Port or his designated representative
determines that the regulated area need not be enforced for the full
duration stated on this document, he or she may use a Broadcast Notice
to Mariners or other communications coordinated with the event sponsor
to grant general permission to enter the regulated area.

    Dated: May 24, 2017.
J.R. Buzzella,
Captain, U.S. Coast Guard, Captain of the Port San Diego.
[FR Doc. 2017-12217 Filed 6-12-17; 8:45 am]
 BILLING CODE 9110-04-P