[Federal Register Volume 83, Number 189 (Friday, September 28, 2018)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Pages 48915-48917]
[FR Doc No: 2018-20917]

=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION

Federal Aviation Administration

14 CFR Part 39

[Docket No. FAA-2018-0452; Product Identifier 2017-NM-150-AD; Amendment
39-19439; AD 2018-20-05]
RIN 2120-AA64

Airworthiness Directives; The Boeing Company Airplanes

AGENCY: Federal Aviation Administration (FAA), DOT.

ACTION: Final rule.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: We are adopting a new airworthiness directive (AD) for all The
Boeing Company Model 727C, 727-100, 727-100C, 727-200, and 727-200F
series airplanes. This AD was prompted by the results of a fleet
survey, which revealed cracking in bulkhead frame webs at a certain
body station. This AD requires repetitive inspections of the bulkhead
frame web at a certain body station and applicable on-condition
actions. We are issuing this AD to address the unsafe condition on
these products.

DATES: This AD is effective November 2, 2018.
    The Director of the Federal Register approved the incorporation by
reference of a certain publication listed in this AD as of November 2,
2018.

ADDRESSES: For service information identified in this final rule,
contact Boeing Commercial Airplanes, Attention: Contractual & Data
Services (C&DS), 2600 Westminster Blvd., MC 110-SK57, Seal Beach, CA
90740-5600; telephone<PHONE_NUMBER>; internet https://www.myboeingfleet.com. You may view this service information at the
FAA, Transport Standards Branch, 2200 South 216th St., Des Moines, WA.
For information on the availability of this material at the FAA, call
206-231-3195. It is also available on the internet at http://www.regulations.gov by searching for and locating Docket No. FAA-2018-
0452.

Examining the AD Docket

    You may examine the AD docket on the internet at http://www.regulations.gov by searching for and locating Docket No. FAA-2018-
0452; or in person at Docket Operations between 9 a.m. and 5 p.m.,
Monday through Friday, except Federal holidays. The AD docket contains
this final rule, the regulatory evaluation, any comments received, and
other information. The address for Docket Operations (phone: 800-647-
5527) is Docket Operations, U.S. Department of Transportation, Docket
Operations, M-30, West Building Ground Floor, Room W12-140, 1200 New
Jersey Avenue SE, Washington, DC 20590.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: George Garrido, Aerospace Engineer,
Airframe Section, FAA, Los Angeles ACO Branch, 3960 Paramount
Boulevard, Lakewood, CA 90712-4137; phone:<PHONE_NUMBER>; fax: 562-627-
5210; email: [email protected].

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

Discussion

    We issued a notice of proposed rulemaking (NPRM) to amend 14 CFR
part 39 by adding an AD that would apply to all The Boeing Company
Model 727C, 727-100, 727-100C, 727-200, and 727-200F series airplanes.
The NPRM published in the Federal Register on May 29, 2018 (83 FR
24433). The NPRM was prompted by the results of a fleet survey on
retired Model 737 airplanes, which revealed cracking in bulkhead frame
webs at a certain body station. No cracks have been reported on Model
727 airplanes but Model 727 and Model 737 airplanes have a similar
frame installation at station 259.5. The NPRM proposed to require
repetitive inspections of the bulkhead frame web at a certain body
station and applicable on-condition actions.

    We are issuing this AD to address cracking in the station 259.5
bulkhead frame web from the first stiffener above stringer S-10 to S-
13. Such cracking may lead to subsequent failure of the skin and
cockpit window surround structure, and could result in rapid
decompression.

Comments

    We gave the public the opportunity to participate in developing
this final rule. The following presents the comments received on the
NPRM and the FAA's response to each comment.

Support for the NPRM

    Boeing concurred with the NPRM.

Request To Specify Repetitive Inspection Interval

    The commenter, Lynise Hogue, indicated that the reports mentioned
in the Discussion section of the NPRM revealed cracking in the bulkhead
frame of retired Boeing Model 737 airplanes but there was no evidence
of cracking in the bulkhead frame of Boeing Model 727 airplanes,
despite those airplanes having a similar frame installation. The
commenter stated this posed concerns and asked how often would ``. . .
said repetitive inspections be conducted?''
    We infer the commenter is asking about the repetitive inspections
required by this AD and agree to clarify the inspection interval. As
stated in paragraph (g) of this AD inspections are done at the
applicable times specified in the ``Compliance'' paragraph of Boeing
Alert Requirements Bulletin 727-53A0235 RB, dated October 12, 2017,
which is at intervals not to exceed 8,600 flight cycles. We have
determined that these intervals and inspections are adequate to address
the unsafe condition. This AD has not been changed in this regard.

Request To Clarify Unsafe Condition

    The commenter, Lynise Hogue, inquired if the unsafe product was
confined to a certain batch or if it is an overall poor product. The
commenter further questioned that if it is indeed an overall poor
product, what measures other than an annual inspection are being taken
to prevent cracking in additional bulkhead frames.
    We agree to clarify. Airplane maintenance and inspection programs
include many types of inspections, which are designed to detect and
address potential unsafe conditions. However, when those inspections
are not adequate to prevent an unsafe condition, we issue an AD to
address the identified unsafe condition, such as this one. We are
currently not planning additional rulemaking on other bulkhead frames.
However, as we obtain and analyze additional data, we might consider
further rulemaking. This AD has not been changed in this regard.

Request To Expand Applicability to All Boeing Airplanes

    The commenter, Lynise Hogue, requested that we change the
applicability to all Boeing airplanes because the proposed AD addresses
``an unsafe condition that is likely to exist or develop on products
identified in this rulemaking action.'' The commenter provided no
further justification for the request.
    We do not agree with the commenter's request to change the
applicability of this AD. The commenter has not provided any additional
data, views, or arguments to support this request. Furthermore, such a
change would expand the scope of this AD and therefore require
additional public review and delay issuance of this final rule. This AD
applies only to those airplanes affected by the identified unsafe
condition. We are currently not planning additional rulemaking for
other airplanes. However, as we obtain and analyze additional data, we
might consider further rulemaking. We have not changed this AD in this
regard.

Conclusion

    We reviewed the relevant data, considered the comments received,
and determined that air safety and the public interest require adopting
this final rule as proposed, except for minor editorial changes. We
have determined that these minor changes:
     Are consistent with the intent that was proposed in the
NPRM for addressing the unsafe condition; and
     Do not add any additional burden upon the public than was
already proposed in the NPRM.

Related Service Information Under 1 CFR Part 51

    We reviewed Boeing Alert Requirements Bulletin 727-53A0235 RB,
dated October 12, 2017. The service information describes procedures
for repetitive high frequency eddy current inspections and low
frequency eddy current inspections for cracks of the station 259.5
bulkhead frame web from the first stiffener above S-10 to S-13, on the
left and right sides of the airplane, and applicable on-condition
actions. This service information is reasonably available because the
interested parties have access to it through their normal course of
business or by the means identified in the ADDRESSES section.

Costs of Compliance

    We estimate that this AD affects 106 airplanes of U.S. registry. We
estimate the following costs to comply with this AD:

                                      Estimated Costs for Required Actions
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
                                                                                Cost on U.S.
              Action                    Labor cost        Parts cost    Cost per product          operators
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Inspections......................  41 work-hours x $85            $0  $3,485 per            $369,410 per
                                    per hour = $3,485                  inspection cycle.     inspection cycle.
                                    per inspection
                                    cycle.
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

    We have received no definitive data that would enable us to provide
cost estimates for the on-condition actions specified in this AD.

Authority for This Rulemaking

    Title 49 of the United States Code specifies the FAA's authority to
issue rules on aviation safety. Subtitle I, section 106, describes the
authority of the FAA Administrator. Subtitle VII: Aviation Programs,
describes in more detail the scope of the Agency's authority.
    We are issuing this rulemaking under the authority described in
Subtitle VII, Part A, Subpart III, Section 44701: ``General
requirements.'' Under that section, Congress charges the FAA with
promoting safe flight of civil aircraft in air commerce by prescribing
regulations for practices, methods, and procedures the Administrator
finds necessary for safety in air commerce. This regulation is within
the scope of that authority because it addresses an unsafe condition
that is likely to exist or develop on products identified in this
rulemaking action.
    This AD is issued in accordance with authority delegated by the
Executive Director, Aircraft Certification Service, as authorized by
FAA Order 8000.51C. In accordance with that order, issuance of ADs is
normally a function of the Compliance and Airworthiness

Division, but during this transition period, the Executive Director has
delegated the authority to issue ADs applicable to transport category
airplanes and associated appliances to the Director of the System
Oversight Division.

Regulatory Findings

    This AD will not have federalism implications under Executive Order
13132. This AD will not have a substantial direct effect on the States,
on the relationship between the national government and the States, or
on the distribution of power and responsibilities among the various
levels of government.
    For the reasons discussed above, I certify that this AD:
    (1) Is not a ``significant regulatory action'' under Executive
Order 12866,
    (2) Is not a ``significant rule'' under DOT Regulatory Policies and
Procedures (44 FR 11034, February 26, 1979),
    (3) Will not affect intrastate aviation in Alaska, and
    (4) Will not have a significant economic impact, positive or
negative, on a substantial number of small entities under the criteria
of the Regulatory Flexibility Act.

List of Subjects in 14 CFR Part 39

    Air transportation, Aircraft, Aviation safety, Incorporation by
reference, Safety.

Adoption of the Amendment

    Accordingly, under the authority delegated to me by the
Administrator, the FAA amends 14 CFR part 39 as follows:

PART 39--AIRWORTHINESS DIRECTIVES

0
1. The authority citation for part 39 continues to read as follows:

    Authority: 49 U.S.C. 106(g), 40113, 44701.

Sec.  39.13  [Amended]

0
2. The FAA amends Sec.  39.13 by adding the following new airworthiness
directive (AD):

2018-20-05 The Boeing Company: Amendment 39-19439; Docket No. FAA-
2018-0452; Product Identifier 2017-NM-150-AD.

(a) Effective Date

    This AD is effective November 2, 2018.

(b) Affected ADs

    None.

(c) Applicability

    This AD applies to all The Boeing Company Model 727C, 727-100,
727-100C, 727-200, and 727-200F series airplanes, certificated in
any category.

(d) Subject

    Air Transport Association (ATA) of America Code 53, Fuselage.

(e) Unsafe Condition

    This AD was prompted by the results of a fleet survey, which
revealed cracking in bulkhead frame webs at a certain body station.
We are issuing this AD to address cracking in the station 259.5
bulkhead frame web from the first stiffener above stringer S-10 to
S-13. Such cracking may lead to subsequent failure of the skin and
cockpit window surround structure, and could result in rapid
decompression.

(f) Compliance

    Comply with this AD within the compliance times specified,
unless already done.

(g) Required Actions

    Except as required by paragraph (h) of this AD: At the
applicable times specified in the ``Compliance'' paragraph of Boeing
Alert Requirements Bulletin 727-53A0235 RB, dated October 12, 2017,
do all applicable actions identified in, and in accordance with, the
Accomplishment Instructions of Boeing Alert Requirements Bulletin
727-53A0235 RB, dated October 12, 2017.
    Note 1 to paragraph (g) of this AD: Guidance for accomplishing
the actions required by this AD can be found in Boeing Alert Service
Bulletin 727-53A0235, dated October 12, 2017, which is referred to
in Boeing Alert Requirements Bulletin 727-53A0235 RB, dated October
12, 2017.

(h) Exceptions to Service Information Specifications

    (1) For purposes of determining compliance with the requirements
of this AD: Where Boeing Alert Requirements Bulletin 727-53A0235 RB,
dated October 12, 2017, uses the phrase ``the original issue date of
Requirements Bulletin 727-53A0235 RB,'' this AD requires using ``the
effective date of this AD.''
    (2) Where Boeing Alert Requirements Bulletin 727-53A0235 RB,
dated October 12, 2017, specifies contacting Boeing, this AD
requires repair using a method approved in accordance with the
procedures specified in paragraph (j) of this AD.

(i) Special Flight Permit

    Special flight permits, as described in Section 21.197 and
Section 21.199 of the Federal Aviation Regulations (14 CFR 21.197
and 21.199), may be issued to operate the airplane to a location
where the requirements of this AD can be accomplished, but
concurrence by the Manager, Los Angeles ACO Branch, FAA, is required
before issuance of the special flight permit.

(j) Alternative Methods of Compliance (AMOCs)

    (1) The Manager, Los Angeles ACO Branch, FAA, has the authority
to approve AMOCs for this AD, if requested using the procedures
found in 14 CFR 39.19. In accordance with 14 CFR 39.19, send your
request to your principal inspector or local Flight Standards
District Office, as appropriate. If sending information directly to
the manager of the certification office, send it to the attention of
the person identified in paragraph (k) of this AD. Information may
be emailed to: [email protected].
    (2) Before using any approved AMOC, notify your appropriate
principal inspector, or lacking a principal inspector, the manager
of the local flight standards district office/certificate holding
district office.
    (3) An AMOC that provides an acceptable level of safety may be
used for any repair, modification, or alteration required by this AD
if it is approved by the Boeing Commercial Airplanes Organization
Designation Authorization (ODA) that has been authorized by the
Manager, Los Angeles ACO Branch, to make those findings. To be
approved, the repair method, modification deviation, or alteration
deviation must meet the certification basis of the airplane, and the
approval must specifically refer to this AD.

(k) Related Information

    For more information about this AD, contact George Garrido,
Aerospace Engineer, Airframe Section, FAA, Los Angeles ACO Branch,
3960 Paramount Boulevard, Lakewood, CA 90712-4137; phone: 562-627-
5232; fax:<PHONE_NUMBER>; email: [email protected].

(l) Material Incorporated by Reference

    (1) The Director of the Federal Register approved the
incorporation by reference (IBR) of the service information listed
in this paragraph under 5 U.S.C. 552(a) and 1 CFR part 51.
    (2) You must use this service information as applicable to do
the actions required by this AD, unless the AD specifies otherwise.
    (i) Boeing Alert Requirements Bulletin 727-53A0235 RB, dated
October 12, 2017.
    (ii) Reserved.
    (3) For service information identified in this AD, contact
Boeing Commercial Airplanes, Attention: Contractual & Data Services
(C&DS), 2600 Westminster Blvd., MC 110-SK57, Seal Beach, CA 90740-
5600; telephone<PHONE_NUMBER>; internet https://www.myboeingfleet.com.
    (4) You may view this service information at the FAA, Transport
Standards Branch, 2200 South 216th St., Des Moines, WA. For
information on the availability of this material at the FAA, call
206-231-3195.
    (5) You may view this service information that is incorporated
by reference at the National Archives and Records Administration
(NARA). For information on the availability of this material at
NARA, call<PHONE_NUMBER>, or go to: http://www.archives.gov/federal-register/cfr/ibr-locations.html.

    Issued in Des Moines, Washington, on September 13, 2018.
Michael Kaszycki,
Acting Director, System Oversight Division, Aircraft Certification
Service.
[FR Doc. 2018-20917 Filed 9-27-18; 8:45 am]
 BILLING CODE 4910-13-P


[Federal Register Volume 85, Number 194 (Tuesday, October 6, 2020)]
[Notices]
[Pages 63128-63130]
[FR Doc No: 2020-22081]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY

Federal Emergency Management Agency

[Docket ID FEMA-2020-0002; Internal Agency Docket No. FEMA-B-2059]

Changes in Flood Hazard Determinations

AGENCY: Federal Emergency Management Agency, DHS.

ACTION: Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: This notice lists communities where the addition or
modification of Base Flood Elevations (BFEs), base flood depths,
Special Flood Hazard Area (SFHA) boundaries or zone designations, or
the regulatory floodway (hereinafter referred to as flood hazard
determinations), as shown on the Flood Insurance Rate Maps (FIRMs), and
where applicable, in the supporting Flood Insurance Study (FIS)
reports, prepared by the Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA) for
each community, is appropriate because of new scientific or technical
data. The FIRM, and where applicable, portions of the FIS report, have
been revised to reflect these flood hazard determinations through
issuance of a Letter of Map Revision (LOMR), in accordance with Federal
Regulations. The LOMR will be used by insurance agents and others to
calculate appropriate flood insurance premium rates for new buildings
and the contents of those buildings. For rating purposes, the currently
effective community number is shown in the table below and must be used
for all new policies and renewals.

DATES: These flood hazard determinations will be finalized on the dates
listed in the table below and revise the FIRM panels and FIS report in
effect prior to this determination for the listed communities.
    From the date of the second publication of notification of these
changes in a newspaper of local circulation, any person has 90 days in
which to request through the community that the Deputy Associate
Administrator for Insurance and Mitigation reconsider the changes. The
flood hazard determination information may be changed during the 90-day
period.

ADDRESSES: The affected communities are listed in the table below.
Revised flood hazard information for each community is available for
inspection at both the online location and the respective community map
repository address listed in the table below. Additionally, the current
effective FIRM and FIS report for each community are accessible online
through the FEMA Map Service Center at https://msc.fema.gov for
comparison.
    Submit comments and/or appeals to the Chief Executive Officer of
the community as listed in the table below.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Rick Sacbibit, Chief, Engineering
Services Branch, Federal Insurance and Mitigation Administration, FEMA,
400 C Street SW, Washington, DC 20472,<PHONE_NUMBER>, or (email)
<EMAIL_ADDRESS>or visit the FEMA Map Information
eXchange (FMIX) online at https://www.floodmaps.fema.gov/fhm/fmx_main.html.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The specific flood hazard determinations are
not described for each community in this notice. However, the online
location and local community map repository address where the flood
hazard determination information is available for inspection is
provided.
    Any request for reconsideration of flood hazard determinations must
be submitted to the Chief Executive Officer of the community as listed
in the table below.
    The modifications are made pursuant to section 201 of the Flood
Disaster Protection Act of 1973, 42 U.S.C. 4105, and are in accordance
with the National Flood Insurance Act of 1968, 42 U.S.C. 4001 et seq.,
and with 44 CFR part 65.
    The FIRM and FIS report are the basis of the floodplain management
measures that the community is required either to adopt or to show
evidence of having in effect in order to qualify or remain qualified
for participation in the National Flood Insurance Program (NFIP).
    These flood hazard determinations, together with the floodplain
management criteria required by 44 CFR 60.3, are the minimum that are
required. They should not be construed to mean that the community must
change any existing ordinances that are more stringent in their
floodplain management requirements. The community may at any time enact
stricter requirements of its own or pursuant to policies established by
other Federal, State, or regional entities. The flood hazard
determinations are in accordance with 44 CFR 65.4.
    The affected communities are listed in the following table. Flood
hazard determination information for each community is available for
inspection at both the online location and the respective community map
repository address listed in the table below. Additionally, the current
effective FIRM and FIS report for each community are accessible online
through the FEMA Map Service Center at https://msc.fema.gov for
comparison.

(Catalog of Federal Domestic Assistance No. 97.022, ``Flood
Insurance.'')

Michael M. Grimm,
Assistant Administrator for Risk Management, Department of Homeland
Security, Federal Emergency Management Agency.

------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
                                                            Chief executive officer of                                    Online location of letter of map                            Community
         State and county          Location and case No.            community               Community map repository                  revision                Date of modification       No.
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Alabama:
    Baldwin......................  Town of Loxley (19-04- The Honorable Billy            Building Department, 1089      https://msc.fema.gov/portal/         Sep. 28, 2020.........       010009
                                    6434P).                Middleton, Mayor, Town of      South Hickory Lane, Loxley,    advanceSearch.
                                                           Loxley, P.O. Box 9, Loxley,    AL 36551.
                                                           AL 36551.
    St. Clair....................  City of Springville    The Honorable Butch Isley,     City Hall, 6327 U.S. Highway   https://msc.fema.gov/portal/         Sep. 25, 2020.........       010289
                                    (19-04-5233P).         Mayor, City of Springville,    11, Springville, AL 35146.     advanceSearch.
                                                           P.O. Box 919, Springville,
                                                           AL 35146.

Colorado: Jefferson..............  City of Westminster    The Honorable Herb Atchison,   City Hall, 4800 West 92nd      https://msc.fema.gov/portal/         Dec. 4, 2020..........       080008
                                    (20-08-0053P).         Mayor, City of Westminster,    Avenue, Westminster, CO        advanceSearch.
                                                           4800 West 92nd Avenue,         80031.
                                                           Westminster, CO 80031.
Florida:
    Lee..........................  City of Fort Myers     Mr. Saeed Kazemi, Manager,     Community Development          https://msc.fema.gov/portal/         Dec. 18, 2020.........       125106
                                    (20-04-2960P).         City of Fort Myers, 1825       Department, 1825 Hendry        advanceSearch.
                                                           Hendry Street, Suite 101,      Street, Fort Myers, FL
                                                           Fort Myers, FL 33901.          33901.
    Manatee......................  Unincorporated areas   The Honorable Betsy Benac,     Manatee County Administration  https://msc.fema.gov/portal/         Dec. 21, 2020.........       120153
                                    of Manatee County      Chair, Manatee County Board    Building, 1112 Manatee         advanceSearch.
                                    (20-04-3496P).         of Commissioners, 1112         Avenue West, Bradenton, FL
                                                           Manatee Avenue West,           34205.
                                                           Bradenton, FL 34205.
    Palm Beach...................  Unincorporated areas   Ms. Verdenia C. Baker, Palm    Palm Beach County Building     https://msc.fema.gov/portal/         Dec. 14, 2020.........       120192
                                    of Palm Beach County   Beach County Administrator,    Division, 2300 North Jog       advanceSearch.
                                    (20-04-1768P).         301 North Olive Avenue,        Road, West Palm Beach, FL
                                                           Suite 1101, West Palm Beach,   33411.
                                                           FL 33401.
    Polk.........................  Unincorporated areas   The Honorable Bill Braswell,   Polk County Land Development   https://msc.fema.gov/portal/         Dec. 24, 2020.........       120261
                                    of Polk County (20-    Chairman, Polk County Board    Division, 330 West Church      advanceSearch.
                                    04-3597P).             of Commissioners, P.O. Box     Street, Bartow, FL 33830.
                                                           9005, Drawer BC01, Bartow,
                                                           FL 33831.
    Seminole.....................  City of Longwood (20-  The Honorable Clint Gioielli,  City Hall, 175 West Warren     https://msc.fema.gov/portal/         Dec. 21, 2020.........       120292
                                    04-2794P).             Acting Manager, City of        Avenue, Longwood, FL 32750.    advanceSearch.
                                                           Longwood, 175 West Warren
                                                           Avenue, Longwood, FL 32750.
Oklahoma: Oklahoma...............  City of Harrah (20-06- The Honorable Larry Fryar,     City Hall, 19625 Northeast     https://msc.fema.gov/portal/         Dec. 14, 2020.........       400140
                                    0411P).                Mayor, City of Harrah, 19625   23rd Street, Harrah, OK        advanceSearch.
                                                           Northeast 23rd Street,         73045.
                                                           Harrah, OK 73045.
Oregon: Washington...............  Unincorporated areas   The Honorable Kathryn          Washington County Land Use     https://msc.fema.gov/portal/         Jan. 4, 2021..........       410238
                                    of Washington County   Harrington, Chair,             and Transportation             advanceSearch.
                                    (19-10-1199P).         Washington County Board of     Department, 1400 Southwest
                                                           Commissioners, 155 North 1st   Walnut Street, Hillsboro, OR
                                                           Avenue, Suite 300,             97123.
                                                           Hillsboro, OR 97124.
Pennsylvania:
    Montgomery...................  Township of Hatfield   The Honorable Tom Zipfel,      Township Hall, 1950 School     https://msc.fema.gov/portal/         Dec. 28, 2020.........       420699
                                    (20-03-0395P).         President, Township of         Road, Hatfield, PA 19440.      advanceSearch.
                                                           Hatfield Board of
                                                           Commissioners, 1950 School
                                                           Road, Hatfield, PA 19440.
    Montgomery...................  Township of Hatfield   The Honorable Tom Zipfel,      Township Hall, 1950 School     https://msc.fema.gov/portal/         Dec. 18, 2020.........       420699
                                    (20-03-1140P).         President, Township of         Road, Hatfield, PA 19440.      advanceSearch.
                                                           Hatfield Board of
                                                           Commissioners, 1950 School
                                                           Road, Hatfield, PA 19440.
    Montgomery...................  Township of            The Honorable Tanya C.         Planning and Zoning            https://msc.fema.gov/portal/         Dec. 28, 2020.........       421226
                                    Montgomery (20-03-     Bamford, Chair, Township of    Department, 1001 Stump Road,   advanceSearch.
                                    0395P).                Montgomery Board of            Montgomeryville, PA 18936.
                                                           Supervisors, 1001 Stump
                                                           Road, Montgomeryville, PA
                                                           18936.
Texas:
    Harris.......................  Unincorporated areas   The Honorable Lina Hidalgo,    Harris County Permit Office,   https://msc.fema.gov/portal/         Dec. 14, 2020.........       480287
                                    of Harris County (20-  Harris County Judge, 1001      10555 Northwest Freeway,       advanceSearch.
                                    06-2000P).             Preston Street, Suite 911,     Suite 120, Houston, TX
                                                           Houston, TX 77002.             77092.
    Kaufman......................  City of Forney (20-06- The Honorable Mary Penn,       City Hall, 101 East Main       https://msc.fema.gov/portal/         Feb. 8, 2021..........       480410
                                    1624P).                Mayor, City of Forney, P.O.    Street, Forney, TX 75126.      advanceSearch.
                                                           Box 826, Forney, TX 75126.

    Kaufman......................  Unincorporated areas   The Honorable Hal Richards,    Kaufman County Development     https://msc.fema.gov/portal/         Feb. 8, 2021..........       480411
                                    of Kaufman County      Kaufman County Judge, 100      Services Department, 106       advanceSearch.
                                    (20-06-1624P).         West Mulberry Street,          West Grove Street, Kaufman,
                                                           Kaufman, TX 75142.             TX 75142.
    Rockwall.....................  City of Rockwall (20-  Mr. Richard R. Crowley,        Engineering Department, 385    https://msc.fema.gov/portal/         Dec. 28, 2020.........       480547
                                    06-1071P).             Manager, City of Rockwall,     South Goliad Street,           advanceSearch.
                                                           385 South Goliad Street,       Rockwall, TX 75087.
                                                           Rockwall, TX 75087.
    Tarrant......................  City of Fort Worth     The Honorable Betsy Price,     Department of Transportation   https://msc.fema.gov/portal/         Dec. 24, 2020.........       480596
                                    (20-06-1449P).         Mayor, City of Fort Worth,     and Public Works,              advanceSearch.
                                                           200 Texas Street, Fort         Engineering Vault, 200 Texas
                                                           Worth, TX 76102.               Street, Fort Worth, TX
                                                                                76102.
    Williamson...................  City of Cedar Park     The Honorable Corbin Van       Engineering Department, 450    https://msc.fema.gov/portal/         Dec. 14, 2020.........       481282
                                    (20-06-1685P).         Arsdale, Mayor, City of        Cypress Creek Road, Building   advanceSearch.
                                                           Cedar Park, 450 Cypress        1, Cedar Park, TX 78613.
                                                           Creek Road, Building 1,
                                                           Cedar Park, TX 78613.
Virginia:
    Loudoun......................  Town of Purcellville   The Honorable Kwasi Fraser,    Planning and Zoning            https://msc.fema.gov/portal/         Dec. 7, 2020..........       510231
                                    (20-03-0501P).         Mayor, Town of Purcellville,   Department, 221 South          advanceSearch.
                                                           221 South Nursery Avenue,      Nursery Avenue,
                                                           Purcellville, VA 20132.        Purcellville, VA 20132.
    Loudoun......................  Unincorporated areas   Mr. Tim Hemstreet, Loudon      Loudoun County Office of       https://msc.fema.gov/portal/         Dec. 7, 2020..........       510090
                                    of Loudoun County      County Administrator, P.O.     Mapping and Geographic         advanceSearch.
                                    (20-03-0501P).         Box 7000, Leesburg, VA         Information, 1 Harrison
                                                           20177.                         Street, Southeast, Leesburg,
                                                                                VA 20175.
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

[FR Doc. 2020-22081 Filed 10-5-20; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 9110-12-P


[Federal Register Volume 80, Number 206 (Monday, October 26, 2015)]
[Notices]
[Pages 65284-65285]
[FR Doc No: 2015-27171]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION

Federal Aviation Administration

Agency Information Collection Activities: Requests for Comments;
Clearance of Renewed Approval of Information Collection: Aviation
Medical Examiner Program

AGENCY: Federal Aviation Administration (FAA), DOT.

ACTION: Notice and request for comments.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: In accordance with the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995, FAA
invites public comments about our intention to request the Office of
Management and Budget (OMB) approval to renew an information
collection. The Federal Register Notice with a 60-day comment period
soliciting comments on the following collection of information was
published on August

12, 2015. This collection is necessary in order to determine
applicants' qualifications for certification as Aviation Medical
Examiners (AMEs).

DATES: Written comments should be submitted by November 25, 2015.

ADDRESSES: Interested persons are invited to submit written comments on
the proposed information collection to the Office of Information and
Regulatory Affairs, Office of Management and Budget. Comments should be
addressed to the attention of the Desk Officer, Department of
Transportation/FAA, and sent via electronic mail to
<EMAIL_ADDRESS>or faxed to<PHONE_NUMBER>, or mailed to
the Office of Information and Regulatory Affairs, Office of Management
and Budget, Docket Library, Room 10102, 725 17th Street NW.,
Washington, DC 20503.
    Public Comments Invited: You are asked to comment on any aspect of
this information collection, including (a) Whether the proposed
collection of information is necessary for FAA's performance; (b) the
accuracy of the estimated burden; (c) ways for FAA to enhance the
quality, utility and clarity of the information collection; and (d)
ways that the burden could be minimized without reducing the quality of
the collected information. The agency will summarize and/or include
your comments in the request for OMB's clearance of this information
collection.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Ronda Thompson at<PHONE_NUMBER>, or
by email at<EMAIL_ADDRESS>
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
    OMB Control Number: 2120-0604.
    Title: Aviation Medical Examiner Program.
    Form Numbers: FAA Form 8520-2.
    Type of Review: Renewal of an information collection.
    Background: The Federal Register Notice with a 60-day comment
period soliciting comments on the following collection of information
was published on August 12, 2015 (80 FR 48391). 14 CFR part 183
describes the requirements for delegating to private physicians the
authority to conduct physical examinations on persons wishing to apply
for their airmen medial certificate. This collection of information is
for the purpose of obtaining essential information concerning the
applicants' professional and personal qualifications. The FAA uses the
information to screen and select the designees who serve as aviation
medical examiners.
    Respondents: Approximately 450 applicants annually.
    Frequency: Information is collected on occasion.
    Estimated Average Burden per Response: 30 minutes.
    Estimated Total Annual Burden: 225 hours.

    Issued in Washington, DC, on October 14, 2015.
Ronda Thompson,
FAA Information Collection Clearance Officer, IT Enterprises Business
Services Division, ASP-110.
[FR Doc. 2015-27171 Filed 10-23-15; 8:45 am]
 BILLING CODE 4910-13-P


[Federal Register Volume 79, Number 165 (Tuesday, August 26, 2014)]
[Notices]
[Pages 50982-50983]
[FR Doc No: 2014-20239]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION

National Highway Traffic Safety Administration

Reports, Forms and Recordkeeping Requirements Agency Information
Collection Activity Under OMB Review

AGENCY: National Highway Traffic Safety Administration, U.S. Department
of Transportation.

ACTION: Notice; correction.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: This document corrects a date and citation in a Federal
Register notice published on Friday, July 25, 2014 (79 FR 43530) that
announced an information collection request (OMB Control No. 201106-
2127-007) was forwarded to the Office of Management and Budget for
review and comment.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Ms. Laurie Flaherty, U.S. Department
of Transportation, NHTSA, Room W44-322, 1200 New Jersey Avenue SE.,
Washington, DC 20590. Ms. Flaherty's telephone number is<PHONE_NUMBER>
and fax number is<PHONE_NUMBER>.

Correction

    In the Federal Register of July 25, 2014, in FR Doc. 2014-0039, on
page 43530, in the third column, under the Supplementary Information,
change the OMB Control Number to read:
    ``OMB Control Number 2127-0679.''

Jeffrey P. Michael,
Associate Administrator, Research and Program Development.
[FR Doc. 2014-20239 Filed 8-25-14; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910-59-P


[Federal Register Volume 77, Number 78 (Monday, April 23, 2012)]
[Notices]
[Pages 24195-24196]
[FR Doc No: 2012-9649]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission

[Project No. 14378-000]

 Green River Energy BFD, LLC; Notice of Preliminary Permit
Application Accepted for Filing and Soliciting Comments, Motions To
Intervene, and Competing Applications

    On March 29, 2012, Green River Energy BFD, LLC filed an application
for a preliminary permit, pursuant to section 4(f) of the Federal Power
Act (FPA), proposing to study the feasibility of a hydropower project
located at the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers' (Corps) Green River Lake
Dam, located on the Green River in Taylor County, Kentucky. The sole
purpose of a preliminary permit, if issued, is to grant the permit
holder priority to file a license application during the permit term. A
preliminary permit does not authorize the permit holder to perform any
land-disturbing activities or otherwise enter upon lands or waters
owned by others without the owners' express permission.
    The proposed project would consist of the following: (1) A
bifurcation structure constructed at the end of the dam's outlet
conduit; (2) a 30-foot-long, 72 inch-diameter steel penstock; (3) a
powerhouse containing two turbine/generating units with a total
capacity of 3.1 megawatts; (4) a 570-foot-long, 12.7-kilovolt (kV)
transmission line. The proposed project would have an average annual
generation of 17,651 megawatt-hours (MWh), and operate utilizing
surplus water from the Green River Lake Dam, as directed by the Corps.
    Applicant Contact: Mr. Mark Boumansour, Green River Energy BFD,
LLC, 1035 Pearl Street 4th Floor, Boulder, CO 80302.<PHONE_NUMBER>.
    FERC Contact: Christiane Casey<EMAIL_ADDRESS>(202)
502-8577.
    Deadline for filing comments, motions to intervene, competing
applications

(without notices of intent), or notices of intent to file competing
applications: 60 days from the issuance of this notice. Competing
applications and notices of intent must meet the requirements of 18 CFR
4.36. Comments, motions to intervene, notices of intent, and competing
applications may be filed electronically via the Internet. See 18 CFR
385.2001(a)(1)(iii) and the instructions on the Commission's Web site
http://www.ferc.gov/docs-filing/efiling.asp. Commenters can submit
brief comments up to 6,000 characters, without prior registration,
using the eComment system at http://www.ferc.gov/docs-filing/ecomment.asp. You must include your name and contact information at the
end of your comments. For assistance, please contact FERC Online
Support at<EMAIL_ADDRESS>or toll free at 1-866-208-3676,
or for TTY,<PHONE_NUMBER>. Although the Commission strongly encourages
electronic filing, documents may also be paper-filed. To paper-file,
mail an original and seven copies to: Kimberly D. Bose, Secretary,
Federal Energy Regulatory Commission, 888 First Street NE., Washington,
DC 20426.
    More information about this project, including a copy of the
application, can be viewed or printed on the ``eLibrary'' link of
Commission's Web site at http://www.ferc.gov/docs-filing/elibrary.asp.
Enter the docket number (P-14378-000) in the docket number field to
access the document. For assistance, contact FERC Online Support.

    Dated: April 13, 2012.
Kimberly D. Bose,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2012-9649 Filed 4-20-12; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6717-01-P


	UNITED STATES ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY

WASHINGTON, D.C.  20460

OFFICE OF CHEMICAL SAFETY AND

POLLUTION PREVENTION

MEMORANDUM

Date:		15-October-2011

Subject:	Spirodiclofen in/on Sugar Apple, Cherimoya, Atemoya, Custard
Apple, Ilama, Soursop, Biriba, Lychee, Longan, Spanish Lime, Rambutan,
Pulasan, Guava, Feijoa, Jaboticaba, Wax Jambu, Starfruit, Passionfruit,
Persimmon, and Acerola.  Summary of Analytical Chemistry and Residue
Data.

PC Code:  124871	DP Barcode:  D387339

Decision No.:  443557	Registration No.:  264-831

Petition No.:  0E7820	Regulatory Action:  Section 3

Risk Assessment Type:  not applicable	Case No.:  7443

TXR No.:  not applicable	CAS No.:  148477-71-8

MRID Nos:  48332901, 48332902, and 48332903	40 CFR:  180.608

From:		Tom Bloem, Chemist

Risk Assessment Branch 1, Health Effects Division (RAB1/HED; 7509C)

Through:	George F. Kramer, Ph.D., Senior Chemist

		HED/RAB1 (7509P)

To:		Barbara Madden/Laura Nollen (RM 05)

		Registration Division (RD; 7505P)

Interregional Research Project Number 4 (IR-4; Princeton, NJ) proposed a
Section 3 registration for application of spirodiclofen
(3-(2,4-dichlorophenyl)-2-oxo-1-oxaspiro[4.5]dec-3-en-4-yl
2,2-dimethylbutanoate; see attachment 1 for structure) to sugar apple,
cherimoya, atemoya, custard apple, ilama, soursop, biriba, lychee,
longan, Spanish lime, rambutan, pulasan, guava, feijoa, jaboticaba, wax
jambu, starfruit, passionfruit, persimmon, and acerola.  In conjunction
with the request, the petitioner proposed the establishment of the
following spirodiclofen per se tolerances:  sugar apple - 0.45 ppm;
cherimoya - 0.45 ppm; atemoya - 0.45 ppm, custard apple - 0.45 ppm;
ilama - 0.45 ppm; soursop - 0.45 ppm; biriba - 0.45 ppm; lychee - 3.5
ppm; longan - 3.5 ppm; Spanish lime - 3.5 ppm; rambutan - 3.5 ppm;
pulasan - 3.5 ppm; guava - 0.45 ppm; feijoa - 0.45 ppm; jaboticaba -
0.45 ppm; wax jambu - 0.45 ppm; starfruit - 0.45 ppm; passionfruit -
0.45 ppm; persimmon - 0.45 ppm; and acerola - 0.45 ppm.

Executive Summary

Background:  Spirodiclofen is a tetronic acid with acaricidal action
(group 23).  It acts by interfering with mite development and controls
such pests as Panonychus spp., Phyllocoptruta spp., Brevipalpus spp.,
and Aculus and Tetranychus species.  The petitioner stated that
spirodiclofen is active by contact to mite eggs, all nymphal stages, and
adult females (adult males are not effected).  Spirodiclofen is
currently registered for application to citrus fruit, grape, pome fruit,
stone fruit, tree nuts, bushberry subgroup 13-07B, avocado, black
sapote, canistel, mamey sapote, mango, papaya, sapodilla, star apple,
and hops with tolerances for residues of spirodiclofen per se of 0.10-30
ppm; milk, milk fat, and ruminant meat, meat byproduct, and fat
tolerance for the combined residues of spirodiclofen and BAJ 2510 are
also established (0.02-0.1 ppm).

Proposed Application Scenarios:  The petitioner proposed use directions
for application of Envidor® 2 SC Miticide (suspension-concentrate; 2
lbs ai/gallon; EPA Reg. No. 264-831) to sugar apple, cherimoya, custard
apple, ilama, soursop, biriba, lychee, longan, Spanish lime, rambutan,
pulasan, guava, feijoa, jaboticaba, wax jambu, starfruit, passionfruit,
persimmon, atemoya, and acerola.  Application through irrigation
equipment and in enclosed structures is prohibited.  See Table 4 for a
summary of the proposed application scenario.  HED requests a revised
Section B which prohibits the addition of an adjuvant to the spray
solution for the proposed crops.

Nature/Magnitude of the Residue - Livestock:  Based on the revised Table
1 feedstuffs (OPPTS 860.1000), none of the proposed crops have feed
commodities; therefore a discussion concerning the nature/magnitude of
the residue in livestock is unnecessary.

Nature/Magnitude of the Residue - Rotational Crops:  Since all of the
requested crops are perennials, a discussion concerning the
nature/magnitude of the residue in rotational crops is unnecessary.

Nature of the Residue - Primary Crops:  Based on the results of the
citrus, grape, and apple metabolism studies (Risk Assessment Document:
D285047, M Clock-Rust et al., 22-Jun-2005); the apple, grape, and orange
processing studies (D341847, T. Bloem, 22-Jun-2005; D359773, T. Bloem,
24-Jun-2009; D390192, T. Bloem, 20-Jun-2011); and previous conclusions
relating to the residues of concern in hops (D346710, M. Sahafeyan,
3-Jan-2008); HED concludes that the residues of concern in the
currently-registered/proposed crops are as follows (see Table 5 for a
summary):  pome fruit, tree nut, and hops - the residue of concern for
risk assessment and tolerance enforcement is spirodiclofen per se and
grape, citrus fruit, stone fruit, berry (crop group (CG) 13), and
tropical fruit - the residue of concern for tolerance enforcement is
spirodiclofen per se and residues of concern for risk assessment are
spirodiclofen and BAJ 2510.  HED notes that following:  (1) BAJ 2510 is
included as a residue of concern in grape, citrus fruit, stone fruit,
berry (CG 13), and tropical fruit due to the demonstrated (grape and
citrus fruit) degradation of parent to BAJ 2510 during processing or due
to the lack of data eliminating this possibility (stone fruit, berry CG
13, and tropical fruit); (2) BAJ 2510 is only a residue of concern in
the processed commodities of grape, citrus fruit, stone fruit, berry (CG
13), and tropical fruit; and (3) if processing data for the combined
residues of spirodiclofen and BAJ 2510 are not available, then the
dietary analysis should incorporate default processing factors.  Based
on the results of the grape and orange processing studies, HED requests
that all future processing studies monitor for residues of
spirodiclofen, BAJ 2510, 3-OH-enol, and 4-OH-enol.

Magnitude of the Residue - Primary Crops:  In support of the proposed
registration, the petitioner submitted field trial studies conducted
with lychee (n=3; North American Free Trade Agreement (NAFTA) Growing
Zone 13), sugar apple (n=3; NAFTA Growing Zone 13), and guava (n=3;
NAFTA Growing Zone 13).  Provided the label is revised to prohibit the
addition of adjuvants to the spray solution, the application scenario
employed in the field trials supports the proposed application scenario.
 Residues of spirodiclofen per se were as follows (method and storage
intervals are validated):  lychee - 0.579-1.54 ppm; sugar apple -
0.051-0.194 ppm; and guava - 0.033-0.247 ppm.  The number and locations
of the lychee, sugar apple, and guava field trials are adequate to
support registration for these crops.  Based on Table 1 of OPPTS
860.1000, processing studies are not required for the proposed crops.

HED has previously approved the following data translations (Reviewer(s
Guide and Summary of HED ChemSAC Approvals for Amending Commodity
Definitions [40 CFR (180.1(h)] and Crop Group/Subgroups [40 CFR
(180.41], B. Schneider, 14-June-2002; see Chemistry Science Advisory
Committee (ChemSAC) Database):  lychee to longan, Spanish lime,
rambutan, and pulasan; sugar apple to atemoya, custard apple, cherimoya,
ilama, soursop, and birida; and guava to feijoa, jaboticaba, wax jambu,
starfruit, passionfruit, and acerola.  In addition, the ChemSAC
previously approved the translation of spirodiclofen guava residue data
to persimmon provided the application scenario for each was identical
(ChemSAC minutes of the 17-Nov-2010 meeting).  Therefore, based on the
available residue data and the Organization for Economic Cooperation and
Development (OECD) tolerance calculator, HED concludes that the
following tolerances for residues of spirodiclofen per se are
appropriate (a revised Section F is requested):  lychee - 4.0 ppm;
longan - 4.0 ppm; Spanish lime - 4.0 ppm; rambutan - 4.0 ppm; pulasan -
4.0 ppm; sugar apple - 0.40 ppm; atemoya - 0.40 ppm; custard apple -
0.40 ppm; cherimoya - 0.40 ppm; ilama - 0.40 ppm; soursop - 0.40 ppm;
birida - 0.40 ppm; guava - 0.50 ppm; feijoa - 0.50 ppm; jaboticaba -
0.50 ppm; wax jambu - 0.50 ppm; starfruit - 0.50 ppm; passionfruit -
0.50 ppm; acerola - 0.50 ppm; and persimmon - 0.50 ppm.

Analytical Enforcement Method:  HED determined that the Bayer analytical
method 109351 was appropriate for enforcement of the hop, citrus, grape,
pome fruit, stone fruit, and tree nut tolerances and forwarded this
method to Food and Drug Administration (FDA) for inclusion in the
Pesticide Analytical Manual (PAM; D368434, T. Bloem, 23-Sep-2009).
Based on the similarities of the tolerance enforcement and the
adequately validated data collection methods, HED concludes that the
current enforcement method is appropriate for enforcement of the
tolerances recommended as part of the current petition.

FDA Multiresidue Methods:  Spirodiclofen and BAJ 2510 were screened
through the FDA MRM protocols.  Since both spirodiclofen and BAJ 2510
are not N-methylcarbamates, naturally fluorescent, acids, phenols, or
substituted ureas, testing through protocols A, B, and G is unnecessary.
 Protocol C modules DG1 and DG10 gave acceptable results for BAJ 2510
and spirodiclofen, respectively (both are gas
chromatography/electron-capture detector (GC/ECD) systems).  Using
fortified orange samples, acceptable recoveries of spirodiclofen were
attained through Protocols D (80-103%) and E (54-77%).  Using fortified
ground beef samples, unacceptable recoveries of spirodiclofen were
attained through protocol F (16-30%).  BAJ 2510 was not recovered
through the florisil clean-up column, and therefore, gave unacceptable
recoveries for Protocol D (fortified orange samples) and F (fortified
ground beef samples).  Since BAJ 2510 was not recovered through Protocol
D, Protocol E was not tested.  These data have been forwarded to FDA
(D308565, T. Bloem, 29-Sep-2004).

Recommendations:  Provided revised Sections B and F are submitted, HED
concludes that the residue chemistry database supports an unconditional
registration for application of spirodiclofen to the proposed crops and
establishment of the following permanent tolerance for residues of only
spirodiclofen (180.608(a)(1)):  lychee - 4.0 ppm; longan - 4.0 ppm;
Spanish lime - 4.0 ppm; rambutan - 4.0 ppm; pulasan - 4.0 ppm; sugar
apple - 0.40 ppm; atemoya - 0.40 ppm; custard apple - 0.40 ppm;
cherimoya - 0.40 ppm; ilama - 0.40 ppm; soursop - 0.40 ppm; birida -
0.40 ppm; guava - 0.50 ppm; feijoa - 0.50 ppm; jaboticaba - 0.50 ppm;
wax jambu - 0.50 ppm; starfruit - 0.50 ppm; passionfruit - 0.50 ppm;
acerola - 0.50 ppm; and persimmon - 0.50 ppm.

In accordance with the most recent guidance concerning tolerance
expressions, HED recommends that the tolerance expression for
180.608(a)(1) and 180.6(a)(2) be changed as indicated below.  HED notes
that this alteration in the tolerance expression does not necessitate a
change in the currently established or recommended tolerance levels.  A
revised Section F specifying the new tolerance expression, the currently
established commodity/tolerance levels, and the HED-recommended
tolerances should be submitted.

180.608(a)(1):  Tolerances are established for residues of
spirodiclofen, including its metabolites and degradates, in or on the
commodities listed below.  Compliance with the following tolerance
levels is to be determined by measuring only spirodiclofen
(3-(2,4-dichlorophenyl)-2-oxo-1-oxaspiro[4.5]dec-3-en-4-yl
2,2-dimethylbutanoate).

180.608(a)(2):  Tolerances are established for residues of
spirodiclofen, including its metabolites and degradates, in or on the
commodities listed below.  Compliance with the following tolerance
levels is to be determined by measuring only spirodiclofen
(3-(2,4-dichlorophenyl)-2-oxo-1-oxaspiro[4.5]dec-3-en-4-yl
2,2-dimethylbutanoate) and its metabolite
3-(2,4-dichlorophenyl)-4-hydroxy-1-oxaspiro[4,5] dec-3-en-2-one.

Summary of Residue Chemistry Deficiencies:

(Revised Section B which prohibits the addition of an adjuvant to the
spray solution for the proposed crops.

(Revised Section F.

Detailed Considerations

Background

Spirodiclofen is a tetronic acid with acaricidal action (group 23).  It
acts by interfering with mite development, and controls such pests as
Panonychus spp., Phyllocoptruta spp., Brevipalpus spp., and Aculus and
Tetranychus species.  The petitioner stated that spirodiclofen is active
by contact to mite eggs, all nymphal stages, and adult females (adult
males are not effected).  Tables 1 and 2 are summaries of spirodiclofen
nomenclature and physical chemical properties, respectively.

Common name	Spirodiclofen

Company experimental name	BAJ2740

IUPAC name	3-(2,4-dichlorophenyl)-2-oxo-1-oxaspiro[4,5]dec-3-en-4-yl
2,2-dimethylbutyrate

CAS name	3-(2,4-dichlorophenyl)-2-oxo-1-oxaspiro[4,5]dec-3-en-4-yl
2,2-dimethylbutanoate

CAS registry number	148477-71-8

End-use product (EP)	2 lb/gal FlC (ENVIDOR® 2 SC Miticide; EPA Reg. No.
264-831)

Table 2:  Physicochemical Properties of Spirodiclofen.

Melting point	94.8ºC	D315459, S. Mathur,

50μg/L

	Solvent solubility (g/L at 20°C)	n-heptane

xylene

dichloromethane

2-propanol

1-octanol

polyethylene glycol

acetone

ethyl acetate

acetonitrile

dimethylsulfoxide	20

>250

>250

47

44

24

>250

>250

>250

75

	Vapor pressure (20ºC)	3 x 10-7 Pa

	Dissociation constant, pKa	Not determinable due to the instability in
aqueous solutions at >pH 4

	Log(KOW) at pH 4 and 20ºC	5.83

	UV/visible absorption spectrum	λmax = 201 nm:  Not expected to absorb
UV at λ >350 nm

860.1200  Directions for Use

The petitioner proposed use directions for application of Envidor® 2 SC
Miticide (suspension-concentrate; 2 lbs ai/gallon; EPA Reg. No. 264-831)
to sugar apple, cherimoya, atemoya, custard apple, ilama, soursop,
biriba, lychee, longan, Spanish lime, rambutan, pulasan, guava, feijoa,
jaboticaba, wax jambu, starfruit, passionfruit, persimmon, and acerola.
Table 3 is a summary of the proposed formulation and target pests and
Table 4 is a summary of the proposed application scenario.  HED requests
a revised Section B which prohibits the addition of an adjuvant to the
spray solution for the proposed crops.

Table 3:  Summary of Proposed End-Use Product and Target Pests.

Trade Name	EPA Reg. No.	concentration	Formulation Type	Label Date	Target
Pests

Sugar Apple, Cherimoya, Atemoya, Custard Apple, Ilama, Soursop, Biriba,
Lychee, Longan, Spanish Lime, Rambutan, Pulasan, Guava, Feijoa,
Jaboticaba, Wax Jambu, Starfruit, Passionfruit, Persimmon, and Acerola

Envidor® 2 SC Mticide	264-831	2 lb ai/gal	SC	not indicated	broad mite,
Carmine spider mite, citrus red mite, flat mite (black and red), persea
mite, sixspotted mite, Texas citrus mite, twospotted spider mite

Table 4:  Summary of Proposed Application Scenarios.

App. Timing; Type; and Equip.	Formulation (EPA Reg. No.)	App. Rate

(lb ai/acre)	Max. #. App. per Season	Max. Seasonal App. Rate (lb
ai/acre)	PHI

(days)	Use Directions and Limitations

Sugar Apple, Cherimoya, Atemoya, Custard Apple, Ilama, Soursop, Biriba,
Lychee, Longan, Spanish Lime, Rambutan, Pulasan, Guava, Feijoa,
Jaboticaba, Wax Jambu, Starfruit, Passionfruit, Persimmon, and Acerola

postemergence; foliar broadcast	2 lb ai/gal  SC

(264-831)	0.28-0.31	1	0.31	1	-Apply in a minimum of 50 GPA with ground
equipment.

-Application through irrigation equipment and in enclosed structures is
prohibited.

860.1300 Nature of the Residue - Plants

Table 5 below is a summary of the HED decisions concerning the residues
of concern in primary crops, livestock, and rotational crops.  For
additional information, see the Executive Summary.

Table 5:  Residues of Concern for Tolerance Expression and Risk
Assessment.

Matrix	Residues included in

Risk Assessment	Residues included in

Tolerance Expression

Pome Fruit, Tree Nut, and Hops	spirodiclofen	spirodiclofen

Grape, Citrus Fruit, Stone Fruit, Berry (CG 13), and Tropical Fruit1
spirodiclofen, BAJ 2510	spirodiclofen

Livestock - Ruminants	spirodiclofen, BAJ 2510	spirodiclofen, BAJ 2510

Livestock - Poultry	no data submitted

Rotational Crops	no data submitted

1  BAJ 2510 is included as a residue of concern in grape, citrus fruit,
stone fruit, berry (CG 13), and tropical fruit due to the demonstrated
(grape and citrus fruit) degradation of parent to BAJ 2510 during
processing or due to the lack of data eliminating this possibility
(stone fruit, berry (CG 13), and tropical fruit).  BAJ 2510 is only a
residue of concern in the processed commodities of grape, citrus fruit,
stone fruit, berry (CG 13), and tropical fruit.  If processing data for
the combined residues of spirodiclofen and BAJ 2510 are not available,
then the dietary analysis should incorporate default processing factors.

860.1300 Nature of the Residue - Livestock

Based on the revised Table 1 feedstuffs (OPPTS 860.1000), none of the
proposed crops have feed commodities; therefore a discussion concerning
the nature of the residue in livestock is unnecessary.

860.1340 Residue Analytical Methods

Tolerance Enforcement:  HED forwarded Bayer analytical method 109351 to
FDA for inclusion in the PAM (D368434, T. Bloem, 23-Sep-2009).  Briefly,
fruit samples are extracted with acetonitrile(ACN):water (2:1; v:v)
containing a small amount of aqueous 20% cysteine hydrochloride,
filtered, and acidified with HCl.  The extract is subjected to clean up
on an ENVI-carb cartridge preconditioned with dichloromethane (DCM),
methanol, and water with residues eluted with DCM under vacuum.  The
resulting eluent is concentrated to dryness and reconstituted in ACN and
water for analysis by high-performance liquid chromatography/mass
spectrometry/mass spectrometry (HPLC/MS/MS).  The limit of quantitation
(LOQ) was reported to be 0.01 ppm (limits of detection (LODs) ranged
from 0.001-0.006 ppm).  Based on the similarities of the tolerance
enforcement and the adequately validated data collection method (see
below), HED concludes that the current enforcement method is appropriate
for enforcement of the tolerances recommended as part of the current
petition.

Data Collection:  A summary of the lychee, sugar apple, and guava data
collection methods are provided below.  The studies indicated that the
DCM partition provided sufficient cleanup to make the ENVI-carb
cartridge cleanup step in the enforcement method unnecessary.

Sugar Apple and Guava:  The sample homogenates were extracted with
ACN/water (2:1, v/v) mixed with a 20% aqueous cysteine hydrochloride
solution.  Following the addition of Celite, the extract was vacuum
filtered, blended with an acetone/DCM solution (1:2, v/v), and vacuum
filtered again.  The filtrate was allowed to separate and the organic
bottom layer was collected and diluted with acetone.  The sample was
then concentrated to dryness and partitioned with hexane and two
portions of ACN pre-saturated with hexane.  All of the transfer solvents
were collected, separated twice to collect the bottom ACN layers, and
then concentrated to dryness.  The samples were partitioned with DCM and
analyzed for residues of spirodiclofen per se using HPLC/MS/MS.

Lychee:  The samples homogenates were extracted with ACN/water (2:1,
v/v) mixed with a 20% aqueous cysteine hydrochloride solution.
Following the addition of Celite, the extract was vacuum filtered,
rinsed, and brought to volume with the extraction solution.  An aliquot
of the sample was mixed with 1.2N HCl, diluted with water, and shaken.
The diluted sample was partitioned with DCM and the lower organic phase
was passed through sodium sulfate.  The sodium sulfate was rinsed with
DCM and evaporated to dryness.  The samples were partitioned with DCM
and analyzed for residues of spirodiclofen per se using HPLC/MS/MS.

860.1360 Multiresidue Methods

Spirodiclofen and BAJ 2510 were screened through the FDA MRM protocols.
Since both spirodiclofen and BAJ 2510 are not N-methylcarbamates,
naturally fluorescent, acids, phenols, or substituted ureas, testing
through protocols A, B, and G is unnecessary.  Protocol C modules DG1
and DG10 gave acceptable results for BAJ 2510 and spirodiclofen,
respectively (both are GC/ECD systems).  Using fortified orange samples,
acceptable recoveries of spirodiclofen were attained through Protocols D
(80-103%) and E (54-77%).  Using fortified ground beef samples,
unacceptable recoveries of spirodiclofen were attained through protocol
F (16-30%).  BAJ 2510 was not recovered through the florisil clean-up
column, and therefore, gave unacceptable recoveries for Protocol D
(fortified orange samples) and F (fortified ground beef samples).  Since
BAJ 2510 was not recovered through Protocol D, Protocol E was not
tested.  These data have been forwarded to FDA (D308565, T. Bloem,
29-Sep-2004).

860.1380 Storage Stability

The lychee, guava, and sugar apple samples from the field trials were
stored frozen for up to 350 days prior to analysis.  As part of the
lychee field trial study, the petitioner submitted storage stability
which indicate that residues of spirodiclofen per se are stable in/on
lychee when stored frozen for 354 days.  HED notes that these data did
not include a zero day analysis as requested in the OPPTS 860.1380
guidelines.  The petitioner previously submitted storage stability data
which indicated that residues of spirodiclofen per se are stable when
stored frozen for the following crop/intervals (D285249, T. Bloem,
18-Apr-2005):  391 days (grape), 231 days (raisin), 226 days (grape
juice concentrate), 231 days (apple juice concentrate), 231 days (dried
apple), 391 days (peaches), 306 days (prunes), 410 days (almond
nutmeat), and 305 days (almond hulls).  The almond hull data indicated a
26% reduction in residues for samples stored 410 days.  These data
support the storage intervals and conditions for the lychee, guava, and
sugar apple samples collected as part of the current study.

860.1480 Meat, Milk, Poultry, and Eggs

Based on the revised Table 1 feedstuffs (OPPTS 860.1000), none of the
proposed crops have feed commodities; therefore a discussion concerning
the magnitude of the residue in livestock is unnecessary.

860.1500 Crop Field Trials

48332901.der, 48332902.der, and 48332903.der

In support of the proposed registration, the petitioner submitted field
trial studies conducted with lychee (n=3; NAFTA Growing Zone 13), sugar
apple (n=3; NAFTA Growing Zone 13), and guava (n=3; NAFTA Growing Zone
13).  Provided the label is revised to prohibit the addition of
adjuvants to the spray solution, the application scenario employed in
the field trials supports the proposed application scenario.  Residues
of spirodiclofen per se were as follows (method and storage intervals
are validated; see Table 6 for a summary):  lychee - 0.579-1.54 ppm;
sugar apple - 0.051-0.194 ppm; and guava - 0.033-0.247 ppm.  The number
and locations of the lychee, sugar apple, and guava field trials are
adequate to support registration for these crops; HED notes that some of
the trials were conducted at the same location but were considered
separate trials due to different application days and due to the
recognized difficulty in finding adequate field trial locations for
these low-acreage crops.  Residue-decline data were included as part of
the lychee field trial study and indicated that per-trial average
spirodiclofen residues increased slightly as the preharvest interval
(PHI) increased from 1 day (1.54 ppm) to 3 days (1.73 ppm) and then
declined as the PHI increased to 14 days (0.62 ppm).

HED has previously approved the following data translations (Reviewer(s
Guide and Summary of HED ChemSAC Approvals for Amending Commodity
Definitions [40 CFR (180.1(h)] and Crop Group/Subgroups [40 CFR
(180.41], B. Schneider, 14-June-2002; see ChemSAC Database):  lychee to
longan, Spanish lime, rambutan, and pulasan; sugar apple to atemoya,
custard apple, cherimoya, ilama, soursop, and birida; and guava to
feijoa, jaboticaba, wax jambu, starfruit, passionfruit, and acerola.  In
addition, the ChemSAC previously approved the translation of
spirodiclofen guava residue data to persimmon provided the application
scenario for each was identical (ChemSAC minutes of the 17-Nov-2010
meeting).  Therefore, based on the available residue data and the OECD
tolerance calculator, HED concludes that the following tolerances for
residues of spirodiclofen per se are appropriate (see attachment 3; a
revised Section F is requested):  lychee - 4.0 ppm; longan - 4.0 ppm;
Spanish lime - 4.0 ppm; rambutan - 4.0 ppm; pulasan - 4.0 ppm; sugar
apple - 0.40 ppm; atemoya - 0.40 ppm; custard apple - 0.40 ppm;
cherimoya - 0.40 ppm; ilama - 0.40 ppm; soursop - 0.40 ppm; birida -
0.40 ppm; guava - 0.50 ppm; feijoa - 0.50 ppm; jaboticaba - 0.50 ppm;
wax jambu - 0.50 ppm; starfruit - 0.50 ppm; passionfruit - 0.50 ppm;
acerola - 0.50 ppm; and persimmon - 0.50 ppm.

Table 6:  Summary of Spirodiclofen per se residue Data from the Lychee,
Sugar Apple, and Guava Field Trials.

Commodity	Analyte	Total App.

Rate

 (lb ai/A)	PHI

(days)	Residue Levels (spirodiclofen per se; ppm)1

n	Sample Min.	Sample Max.	LAFT2	HAFT2	Median	Mean	Std. Dev.

Lychee fruit	Spirodiclofen	0.3164-0.3212	1	3	0.579	1.54	0.657	1.54	0.955
1.05	0.449

Sugar apple fruit	Spirodiclofen	0.3181-0.3196	1	3	0.051	0.194	0.095
0.138	0.122	0.118	0.022

Guava fruit	Spirodiclofen	0.3161-0.3243	1	3	0.033	0.247	0.085	0.230
0.192	0.169	0.075

1 Except for sample min/max, values reflect per trial averages; n = no.
of field trials.

2 LAFT = lowest-average-field-trial; HAFT = highest-average-field-trial.

860.1520 Processed Food and Feed

Based on Table 1 of OPPTS 860.1000, processing studies are not required
for the proposed crops.

860.1850/860.1900 Confined and Field Accumulation in Rotational Crops

Since all of the requested crops are perennials, a discussion concerning
the nature/magnitude of the residue in rotational crops is unnecessary.

860.1550 Proposed/Recommended Tolerances

Table 5 is a summary of the proposed and recommended tolerance for
residues of spirodiclofen per se.  There are no Codex, Canadian, or
Mexican maximum residue limits (MRLs) in/on the requested crops.
Therefore, harmonization is not an issue for this petition.

In accordance with the most recent guidance concerning tolerance
expressions, HED recommends that the tolerance expression for
180.608(a)(1) and 180.6(a)(2) be changed as indicated below.  HED notes
that this alteration in the tolerance expression does not necessitate a
change in the currently established or recommended tolerance levels.  A
revised Section F specifying the new tolerance expression, the currently
established commodity/tolerance levels, and the HED-recommended
tolerance should be submitted.

180.608(a)(1):  Tolerances are established for residues of
spirodiclofen, including its metabolites and degradates, in or on the
commodities listed below.  Compliance with the following tolerance
levels is to be determined by measuring only spirodiclofen
(3-(2,4-dichlorophenyl)-2-oxo-1-oxaspiro[4.5]dec-3-en-4-yl
2,2-dimethylbutanoate.

180.608(a)(2):  Tolerances are established for residues of
spirodiclofen, including its metabolites and degradates, in or on the
commodities listed below.  Compliance with the following tolerance
levels is to be determined by measuring only spirodiclofen
(3-(2,4-dichlorophenyl)-2-oxo-1-oxaspiro[4.5]dec-3-en-4-yl
2,2-dimethylbutanoate) and its metabolite
3-(2,4-dichlorophenyl)-4-hydroxy-1-oxaspiro[4,5] dec-3-en-2-one.

Table 5:  Tolerance Summary.

Commodity	Proposed Tolerance (ppm)	HED-Recommended Tolerance (ppm)
Comments

Lychee	3.5	4.0	Based on the field trial data and the OECD tolerance
calculator, the appropriate tolerance for residues of spirodiclofen per
se in/on these crops is 4.0 ppm.

Longan	3.5	4.0

	Spanish lime	3.5	4.0

	Rambutan	3.5	4.0

	Pulasan	3.5	4.0

	Sugar apple	0.45	0.40	Based on the field trial data and the OECD
tolerance calculator, the appropriate tolerance for residues of
spirodiclofen per se in/on these crops is 0.40 ppm.

Atemoya	0.45	0.40

	Custard apple	0.45	0.40

	Cherimoya	0.45	0.40

	Ilama	0.45	0.40

	Soursop	0.45	0.40

	Biriba	0.45	0.40

	Guava	0.45	0.50	Based on the field trial data and the OECD tolerance
calculator, the appropriate tolerance for residues of spirodiclofen per
se in/on these crops is 0.50 ppm.

Feijoa	0.45	0.50

	Jaboticaba	0.45	0.50

	Wax jambu	0.45	0.50

	Starfruit	0.45	0.50

	Passionfruit	0.45	0.50

	Acerola	0.45	0.50

	Persimmon	0.45	0.50

Attachment 1:  Chemical Structures

Attachment 2:  Codex

Attachment 3:  Tolerance Calculation

  SEQ CHAPTER \h \r 1 RDI: RAB1 Chemists (28-Sep-2011)

T. Bloem:S10945:Potomac Yard 1:703-605-0217:7509P:RABI

Attachment 1:  Chemical Structures

Chemical Name	Structure

Spirodiclofen; BAJ2740

3-(2,4-dichlorophenyl)-2-oxo-1-oxaspiro[4,5]dec-3-en-4-yl
2,2-dimethylbutanoate

BAJ 2510

3-OH-enol

4-OH-enol

Attachment 2:  International residue Limit Status

欀賓

#

*

+

I

J

X

h

k

’

“

¢

¼

Ã

Ä

ì

£

¥

°

ЀW

X

‰

œ

Æ

ë

ì

°

h{

hú

hú

kd

hú

H*

gdÅ

ytÅ

ytÅ

gdÅ

gdÅ

gdÅ

gdÅ

hú

üøüøüøüøüøüøôøíøüøüøüøüøüøüôéüßØÑßÑØ
ÑßØÈÁÈ»È»È»È¯»È»È»©Ÿ©»˜È

 h

 h

  h

]

  h

H*

 h

 h

ฃ昀Ĵ瑹ㄝã

ฃ昀Ĵ瑹ㄝã

ฃ昀Ĵ瑹ㄝã

ฃ昀Ĵ瑹ㄝã

ฃ昀Ĵ瑹ㄝã

ฃ昀Ĵ瑹ㄝã

ฃ昀Ĵ瑹ㄝã

gdÅ

gdÅ

ytÅ

gdÅ

ytÅ

  hÅ

ytÅ

ytÅ

ytÅ

S

S

S

S

S

S

S

S

S

S

S

S

S

S

S

ommodities of interest for this action.  Tolerance values should be the
HED recommendations and not those proposed by the applicant.

2  Mexico adopts US tolerances and/or Codex MRLs for its export
purposes.

3  * = absent at the limit of quantitation; Po = postharvest treatment,
such as treatment of stored grains.  PoP = processed postharvest treated
commodity, such as processing of treated stored wheat.  (fat) = to be
measured on the fat portion of the sample.  MRLs indicated as proposed
have not been finalized by the CCPR and the CAC.

Attachment 3:  Tolerance Calculation

Spirodiclofen	Summary of Analytical Chemistry and Residue Data	D387339

Page   PAGE  10  of   NUMPAGES  13


[Federal Register Volume 82, Number 136 (Tuesday, July 18, 2017)]
[Notices]
[Page 32874]
[FR Doc No: 2017-15034]

=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF LABOR

Occupational Safety and Health Administration

Susan Harwood Training Grant Program, FY 2017

AGENCY: Occupational Safety and Health Administration (OSHA), Labor.

ACTION: Notice of availability of funds and funding opportunity
announcement (FOA) for Targeted Topic Training grants.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

FUNDING OPPORTUNITY NUMBER: SHTG-FY-17-01 (Targeted Topic grants)

CATALOG OF FEDERAL DOMESTIC ASSISTANCE NUMBER: 17.502

SUMMARY: This notice announces availability of approximately $10.5
million for Susan Harwood Training Program grants. The funding
opportunity announcement is available for Targeted Topic Training
grants. Funding Opportunity Number SHTG-FY-17-01 will cover the two
types of Targeted Topic Training grants: (1) Targeted Topic Training
and (2) Training and Educational Materials Development grants.

DATES: Grant applications for Targeted Topic Training grants must be
received electronically by the Grants.gov system no later than 11:59
p.m., ET, on August 28, 2017.

ADDRESSES: The complete Susan Harwood Training Grant Program funding
opportunity announcement and all information needed to apply are
available at the Grants.gov Web site, http://www.grants.gov.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Questions regarding the funding
opportunity announcement should be emailed to<EMAIL_ADDRESS>or
by telephone at:<PHONE_NUMBER>. This is not a toll-free number.
Personnel will not be available to answer questions after 5:00 p.m.,
ET.
    To obtain further information on the Susan Harwood Training Grant
Program, visit the OSHA Web site at: https://www.osha.gov/dte/sharwood/index.html.
    Questions regarding Grants.gov should be emailed to
<EMAIL_ADDRESS>or directed to the Applicant Support toll free at 1-
800-518-4726. The Applicant Support is available 24 hours a day, 7 days
a week except on Federal holidays.

Authority and Signature

    Thomas Galassi, Acting Deputy Assistant Secretary of Labor for
Occupational Safety and Health, directed the preparation of this
notice. The authority for this notice is Section 21 of the Occupational
Safety and Health Act of 1970, (29 U.S.C. 670), Public Law 113-235, and
Secretary of Labor's Order No. 1-2012 (77 FR 3912).

    Signed at Washington, DC, on July 11, 2017.
Thomas Galassi,
Acting Deputy Assistant Secretary of Labor for Occupational Safety and
Health.
[FR Doc. 2017-15034 Filed 7-17-17; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4510-26-P


[Federal Register: July 9, 2009 (Volume 74, Number 130)]
[Notices]
[Page 32916-32917]
[DOCID:fr09jy09-66]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY

[EPA-HQ-OECA-2008-0899; FRL-8928-8]

Agency Information Collection Activities; Submission to OMB for
Review and Approval; Comment Request; NSPS for Stationary Compression
Ignition Internal Combustion Engines (Renewal), EPA ICR Number 2196.03,
OMB Control Number 2060-0590

AGENCY: Environmental Protection Agency (EPA).

ACTION: Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: In compliance with the Paperwork Reduction Act (44 U.S.C. 3501
et seq.), this document announces that an Information Collection
Request (ICR) has been forwarded to the Office of Management and Budget
(OMB) for review and approval. This is a request to renew an existing
approved collection. The ICR, which is abstracted below, describes the
nature of the collection and the estimated burden and cost.

DATES: Additional comments may be submitted on or before August 10,
2009.

ADDRESSES: Submit your comments, referencing docket ID number EPA-HQ-
OECA-2008-0899, to (1) EPA online using www.regulations.gov (our
preferred method), or by e-mail to<EMAIL_ADDRESS>or by mail to:
EPA Docket Center (EPA/DC), Environmental Protection Agency,
Enforcement and Compliance Docket and Information Center, mail code
28221T, 1200 Pennsylvania Avenue, NW., Washington, DC 20460, and (2)
OMB at: Office of Information and Regulatory Affairs, Office of
Management and Budget (OMB), Attention: Desk Officer for EPA, 725 17th
Street, NW., Washington, DC 20503.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Learia Williams, Compliance Assessment
and Media Programs Division, Office of Compliance, Mail Code 2223A,
Environmental Protection Agency, 1200 Pennsylvania Avenue, NW.,
Washington, DC 20460; telephone number:<PHONE_NUMBER>; fax number:
(202) 564-0050; e-mail address<EMAIL_ADDRESS>
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: EPA has submitted the following ICR to OMB
for review and approval according to the procedures prescribed in 5 CFR
1320.12. On December 29, 2008 (73 FR 79470), EPA sought comments on
this ICR pursuant to 5 CFR 1320.8(d). EPA received no comments. Any
additional comments on this ICR should be submitted to EPA and OMB
within 30 days of this notice.
    EPA has established a public docket for this ICR under docket ID
number EPA-HQ-OECA-2008-0899, which is available for public viewing
online at http://www.regulations.gov or in person viewing at the
Enforcement and Compliance Docket in the EPA Docket Center (EPA/DC),
EPA West, Room 3334, 1301 Constitution Avenue, NW., Washington, DC. The
EPA Docket Center Public Reading Room is open from 8:30 a.m. to 4:30
p.m., Monday through Friday, excluding legal holidays. The telephone
number for the Reading Room is<PHONE_NUMBER>, and the telephone number
for the Enforcement and Compliance Docket is<PHONE_NUMBER>.
    Use EPA's electronic docket and comment system at http://
www.regulations.gov, to submit or view public comments, access the
index listing of the contents of the docket, and to access those
documents in the docket that are available electronically. Once in the
system, select ``docket search,'' then key in the docket ID number
identified above. Please note that EPA's policy is that public
comments, whether submitted electronically or in paper will be made
available for public viewing at http://www.regulations.gov, as EPA
receives them and without change, unless the comment contains
copyrighted material, Confidential Business Information (CBI), or other
information whose public disclosure is restricted by statute. For
further information about the electronic docket, go to http://
www.regulations.gov.
    Title: NSPS for Stationary Compression Ignition Internal Combustion
Engines (Renewal).
    ICR Numbers: EPA ICR Number 2196.03, OMB Control Number 2060-0590.
    ICR Status: This ICR is schedule to expire on August 31, 2009.
Under OMB regulations, the Agency may continue to conduct or sponsor
the collection of information while this submission is pending at OMB.
An Agency may not conduct or sponsor, and a person is not required to
respond to, a collection of information unless it displays a currently
valid OMB control number. The OMB control numbers for EPA's regulations
in title 40 of the CFR, after appearing in the Federal Register when
approved, are listed in 40 CFR part 9, and displayed either by
publication in the Federal Register or by other appropriate means, such
as on the related collection instrument or form, if applicable. The
display of OMB control numbers in certain EPA regulations is
consolidated in 40 CFR part 9.

    Abstract: The New Source Performance Standards (NSPS) for
Stationary Compression Ignition Internal Combustion Engines were
proposed on July 11, 2005, and promulgated on July 11, 2006. These
regulations apply to stationary compression ignition (CI) internal
combustion engines (ICE).
    Owners or operators of the affected facilities must submit an
initial notification report also manufacturers are required to submit
an application for certification, including emission data and other
descriptive information for each engine family subject to the standard.
They are also required to maintain records of corrective action taken
after the backpressure monitor has alerted the owner or operator of a
high backpressure limit. Annual reports are also required.
    Any owner or operator subject to the provisions of this subpart
must maintain a file of these measurements, and retain the file for at
least two years following the collection of such measurements,
maintenance reports, and records.
    All reports are sent to the delegated State or local authority. In
the event that there is no such delegated authority, the reports are
sent directly to the EPA regional office. This information is being
collected to assure compliance with 40 CFR part 60, subpart IIII, as
authorized in sections 112 and 114(a) of the Clean Air Act. The
required information consists of emissions data and other information
that have been determined to be private.
    Burden Statement: The annual public reporting and recordkeeping
burden for this collection of information estimated to average one hour
per response. Burden means the total time, effort, or financial
resources expended by persons to generate, maintain, retain, or
disclose and provide information either to or for a Federal agency.
This includes the time needed to review instructions; develop, acquire,
install, and utilize technology and systems for the purposes of
collecting, validating, and verifying information, processing and
maintaining information, and disclosing and providing information. All
existing ways will have to adjust to comply with any previously
applicable instructions and requirements that have subsequently
changed; train personnel to be able to respond to a collection of
information; search data sources; complete and review the collection of
information; and transmit or otherwise disclose the information.
    Respondents/Affected Entities: Stationary source compression
ignition internal combustion engines.
    Estimated Number of Respondents: 206,290.
    Frequency of Response: Initially and annually.
    Estimated Total Annual Hour Burden: 192,197.
    Estimated Total Annual Cost: $19,015,209, which includes
$18,773,209 in labor costs, $242,000 in operation and maintenance
costs, and no capital/startup costs.
    Changes in the Estimates: There is an adjustment increase of 47,062
hours in the total estimated labor hour burden as currently identified
in the OMB Inventory of Approved ICR Burdens because the standard is
now fully implemented. There has not been an increase in the number of
facilities subject to the standard. It should be noted that the
increase is not due to any program changes.
    The previous ICR covered the initial phase of standard
implementation, which occurred over a three-year period. Hence, the
average number of respondents during the initial phase is less than the
number of respondents when the standard is fully implemented. This ICR
shows the labor hour burden after full implementation.
    There are no changes of cost in the capital/startup and operating
and maintenance (O&M) costs associated with this ICR.

    Dated: July 2, 2009.
John Moses,
Director, Collection Strategies Division.
[FR Doc. E9-16266 Filed 7-8-09; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 6560-50-P


[Federal Register: November 30, 2005 (Volume 70, Number 229)]
[Notices]
[Page 71824]
[DOCID:fr30no05-52]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission

[Docket Nos. EC03-131-003, EC03-131-004]

Oklahoma Gas and Electric Company; Notice of Technical Conference

November 23, 2005.
    Parties are invited to attend a technical conference in the above-
referenced Oklahoma Gas and Electric Company (OG&E) proceeding on
December 1, 2005 at Commission Headquarters, 888 First Street, NE.,
Washington, DC 20426. The technical conference will be held from 10
a.m. until 5 p.m, in Conference Room 3M2-A. Arrangements have been made
for parties to listen to the technical conference by telephone.
    On July 2, 2004, the Commission approved OG&E's Offer of Settlement
in this proceeding subject to certain modifications. In the Offer of
Settlement, OG&E offered a number of permanent and interim mitigation
measures. Among these mitigation measures was a commitment to construct
a 600 MW Bridge between InterGen's Redbud Energy Project and OG&E's
control area that would create an additional 600 MWs of available
transmission capacity. See Oklahoma Gas and Electric and NRG McClain
LLC, 105 FERC ] 61,297 (2003), order approving settlement, 108 FERC ]
61,004 (2004). On May 31, 2005, OG&E filed a letter informing the
Commission that, as of May 19, 2005, all of the facilities that OG&E
committed to construct under the Offer of Settlement were placed into
commercial operation.
    The purpose of the conference is to discuss whether the upgrades
completed by OG&E resulted in an additional 600 MWs of available
transmission capacity, as required in the July 2004 Order.
    Questions about the conference and the telephone conference call
arrangements should be directed to: David Hunger,
<EMAIL_ADDRESS>Office of Markets Tariffs and Rates, Federal

Energy Regulatory Commission, 888 First Street, NE., Washington, DC
20426,<PHONE_NUMBER>.

Magalie R. Salas,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. E5-6696 Filed 11-29-05; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 6717-01-P


[Federal Register: July 27, 2010 (Volume 75, Number 143)]
[Notices]
[Page 43958]
[DOCID:fr27jy10-66]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission

[Project No. 12548-006]

Hydrodynamics, Inc.; Notice of Application for Surrender of
License and Soliciting Comments, Motions To Intervene, and Protests

July 20, 2010.
    Take notice that the following application has been filed with the
Commission and is available for public inspection:
    a. Application: Type: Surrender of License.
    b. Project No.: 12548-006.
    c. Date Filed: June 25, 2010.
    d. Applicant: Hydrodynamics, Inc.
    e. Name of Project: Greenfield Hydroelectric Project.
    f. Location: The unconstructed project was to be located on the
Greenfields Main Canal, which is a feature of the U.S. Bureau of
Reclamation's Sun River Project, in Teton County, Montana.
    g. Filed Pursuant to: Federal Power Act, 16 U.S.C. 791a-825r.
    h. Applicant Contact: Mr. Roger Kirk, Hydrodynamics, Inc., P.O. Box
1136, Bozeman, MT 59771,<PHONE_NUMBER>.
    i. FERC Contact: Patricia W. Gillis, Telephone<PHONE_NUMBER>.
    j. Deadline for filing comments, motions to intervene, and
protests: August 19, 2010. Comments, motions to intervene, and protests
may be filed electronically via the Internet. See 18 CFR
385.2001(a)(1)(iii) and the instructions on the Commission's Web site
under the ``eFiling'' link. If unable to be filed electronically,
documents may be paper-filed. To paper-file, an original and eight
copies should be mailed to: Kimberly D. Bose, Secretary, Federal Energy
Regulatory Commission, 888 First Street, NE., Washington, DC 20426. For
more information on how to submit these types of filings, please go to
the Commission's Web site located at http://www.ferc.gov/filing-
comments.asp.
    k. Description of Request: The licensee filed an application to
surrender its license for the unconstructed Greenfield Hydroelectric
Project. The Licensee has not commenced construction of the project. No
ground disturbing activities have occurred.
    l. Locations of the Application: A copy of the application is
available for inspection and reproduction at the Commission's Public
Reference Room, located at 888 First Street, NE., Room 2A, Washington,
DC 20426, or by calling<PHONE_NUMBER>. This filing may also be viewed
on the Commission's Web site at http://www.ferc.gov using the
``eLibrary'' link. Enter the docket number (P-12548) excluding the last
three digits in the docket number field to access the document. You may
also register Online at http://www.ferc.gov/docs-filing/
esubscription.asp to be notified via e-mail of new filings and
issuances related to this or other pending projects. For assistance,
call 1-866-208-3676 or e-mail<EMAIL_ADDRESS>for TTY, call
(202) 502-8659. A copy is also available for inspection and
reproduction at the address in item (h) above.
    m. Individuals desiring to be included on the Commission's mailing
list should so indicate by writing to the Secretary of the Commission.
    n. Comments, Protests, or Motions To Intervene: Anyone may submit
comments, a protest, or a motion to intervene in accordance with the
requirements of Rules of Practice and Procedure, 18 CFR 385.210, .211,
.214. In determining the appropriate action to take, the Commission
will consider all protests or other comments filed, but only those who
file a motion to intervene in accordance with the Commission's Rules
may become a party to the proceeding. Any comments, protests, or
motions to intervene must be received on or before the specified
comment date for the particular application.
    o. Filing and Service of Responsive Documents--All filings must:
(1) Bear in all capital letters the title ``COMMENTS,'' ``PROTEST,'' OR
``MOTION TO INTERVENE,'' as applicable, and the Project Number of the
particular application to which the filing refers.
    p. Agency Comments--Federal, state, and local agencies are invited
to file comments on the described application. A copy of the
application may be obtained by agencies directly from the Applicant. If
an agency does not file comments within the time specified for filing
comments, it will be presumed to have no comments. One copy of an
agency's comments must also be sent to the Applicant's representatives.

Kimberly D. Bose,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2010-18284 Filed 7-26-10; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6717-01-P