[Federal Register: October 4, 2006 (Volume 71, Number 192)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Page 58498]
[DOCID:fr04oc06-8]

=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY

40 CFR Parts 51, 52, and 80

[OAR 2003-0079; FRL-8227-6]
RIN 2060-AJ99

Final Rule To Implement the 8-Hour Ozone National Ambient Air
Quality Standard--Phase 2; Final Rule To Implement Certain Aspects of
the 1990 Amendments Relating to New Source Review and Prevention of
Significant Deterioration as They Apply in Carbon Monoxide, Particulate
Matter and Ozone NAAQS; Final Rule for Reformulated Gasoline;
Correction

AGENCY: Environmental Protection Agency (EPA).

ACTION: Final rule; correction.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The EPA issued a final rule on November 29, 2005, which took
action on elements of the program to implement the 8-hour ozone
national ambient air quality standard (NAAQS or standard)--Phase 2. The
preamble contains a discussion of the Clean Air Act's (CAA's)
reasonable further progress (RFP) requirements, and this document
clarifies the correct citation in the CAA that should have been
referenced. Finally, this document is modifying several incorrect
citations in Appendix A of the preamble which addresses calculation of
RFP targets. This action is needed so States will have the correct
version of the Phase 2 rule. The intended effect is to correct the
errors in the Phase 2 rule.

EFFECTIVE DATE: This document is effective on October 4, 2006.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Ms. Denise Gerth, Office of Air
Quality Planning and Standards, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency,
Mail Code C539-01, Research Triangle Park, NC 27711, phone number (919)
541-5550, fax number<PHONE_NUMBER> or by e-mail at
<EMAIL_ADDRESS>or Mr. John Silvasi, Office of Air Quality

Planning and Standards, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Mail Code
C539-01, Research Triangle Park, NC 27711, phone number<PHONE_NUMBER>,
fax number<PHONE_NUMBER> or by e-mail at<EMAIL_ADDRESS>
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The EPA issued the Phase 2 Rule to Implement
the 8-Hour Ozone NAAQS on November 29, 2005 (70 FR 71612). The purpose
of this document is to correct four technical errors in the final rule.
    Section E.1.b. of the preamble (70 FR 71633; first column) provides
information on the RFP requirements for areas classified under subpart
2 as serious and above that had met the 15-percent VOC emission
reduction requirement for the 1-hour standard. The preamble stated that
such areas would be subject to the RFP requirements of section 172(e)
of the CAA. The reference to section 172(e) was inaccurate so we are
issuing this correction notice to clarify that such areas would be
subject to the RFP requirements of section 172(c) of the CAA. The
regulatory text promulgated at 40 CFR 51.910(a)(1)(ii)(A) (70 FR 71700)
correctly references section 172(c)(2).
    The final set of corrections are being made to language in Method
2, Method 3 and Method 4 of Appendix A (70 FR 71696-71697) which
addresses calculation of RFP targets.
    The reference in Method 2 to areas covered under 40 CFR
51.910(a)(1)(ii)(C) is incorrect and the correct citation is 40 CFR
51.910(a)(1)(ii)(B). The following is the corrected language:

    ``For areas covered under 40 CFR 51.910(a)(1)(ii)(B) and that
meet an 18-percent VOC emission reduction requirement by 2008 with
NOX substitution allowed, following EPA's NOX
Substitution Guidance:''.

    The references in Method 3 in paragraphs E and F (71697, column 1)
to Steps C, D and E are incorrect. The following is the corrected
language:

    (E) The target level of VOC and NOX emissions in 2011
needed to meet the 2011 ROP requirement is any combination of VOC
and NOX reductions from the adjusted inventories
calculated in Step D that total nine percent. For example, the
target level of VOC emissions in 2011 could be a four-percent
reduction from the adjusted VOC inventory in Step D and a five-
percent reduction from the adjusted NOX inventory in Step
D * * * [Emphasis Added].
    (F) For subsequent * * *. This value is subtracted from the 2011
target level of NOX emissions calculated in Step E to get
the adjusted NOX inventory to be used as the basis for
calculating the target level of NOX emissions in 2014.
[Emphasis Added].

    The reference Method 4 in paragraph D (71697, second column) to
Step E is incorrect. The following is the corrected language:

    (D) The target level of VOC and NOX emissions in 2011
needed to meet the 2011 ROP requirement is any combination of VOC
and NOX reductions from the adjusted inventories
calculated in Step C that total nine percent * * * [Emphasis Added].

    In addition, for all of Appendix A, the term ``ROP'' should read
``RFP.'' This is consistent with the definition of RFP in the Phase 1
rule (69 FR 23974, footnote 32).

List of Subjects

40 CFR Part 51

    Environmental protection, Air pollution control, Carbon monoxide,
Intergovernmental relations, Ozone, Particulate matter, Transportation,
Volatile organic compounds.

40 CFR Part 52

    Air pollution control, Carbon monoxide, Intergovernmental
relations, Ozone, Particulate matter.

40 CFR Part 80

    Fuel additives, Gasoline, Motor vehicle pollution, Ozone.

    Authority: 42 U.S.C. 7408; 47 U.S.C. 7410; 42 U.S.C. 7501-7511;
42 U.S.C. 7601(a)(1); 42 U.S.C. 7401.

    Dated: September 28, 2006.
Stephen L. Johnson,
Administrator.
 [FR Doc. E6-16377 Filed 10-3-06; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 6560-50-P


PAPERWORK REDUCTION ACT SUBMISSION SAN 4770 Please read the instructions before completing this form. For additional forms or assistance in completing this form, contact your agency's Paperwork Clearance Officer. Send two copies of this form, the collection instrument to be reviewed, the Supporting Statement and any additional documentation to: Office of Information and Regulatory Affairs, Office of Management and Budget, Docket Library, Room 10102, 725 17th Street NW Washington, DC 20503.

1. Agency/ Subagency originating request U. S. Environmental Protection Agency / Office of Water / Office of Ground Water and Drinking Water 2. OMB control number b. X None a. 2040 NEW 3. Type of information collection ( check one)

a.

New collection b. G Revision of a currently approved collection c. G Extension of a currently approved collection d. G Reinstatement, without change, of a previously approved collection for which approval has expired e. G Reinstatement, with change, of a previously approved collection for which approval has expired f. G Existing collection in use without an OMB control number For b f, note item A2 of Supporting Statement Instructions 4. Type of review requested ( check one)

a.

Regular b. G Emergency  Approval requested by: / / c. G Delegated 5. Small entities Will this information collection have a significant economic impact on a substantial number of small entities? G Yes

No 6. Requested expiration date a.

Three years from approval date b. G Other Specify: / /___

7. Title Revisions to the Unregulated Contaminant Monitoring Regulation ( UCMR) for Public Water Systems ( Proposed Rule)

8. Agency form number( s) ( If applicable) EPA ICR Number 2192.01 9. Keywords Chemicals, Drinking water, Environmental protection, Explosives, Federal State relations, Health, Pesticides and pests, Toxins, Water supply, Acetanilide, Analytical methods, MRL ( LCMRL), Nitrosamines, Triazines, Perchlorate, Unregulated contaminant monitoring 10. Abstract The Safe Drinking Water Act ( SDWA), as amended in 1996, requires the United States Environmental Protection Agency ( EPA) to establish criteria for a program to monitor unregulated contaminants and to publish a list of contaminants to be monitored every five years. EPA published such a list for the first Unregulated Contaminant Monitoring Regulation cycle ( i. e., UCMR 1) and a revised approach for UCMR implementation in the Federal Register dated September 17, 1999. EPA is publishing this proposed regulation to establish the design for the second UCMR cycle of 2007 2011. Public water systems ( PWSs) serving more than 10,000 people and 800 representative PWSs serving 10,000 or fewer people will be required to conduct Assessment Monitoring for 11 chemicals ( List 1) in a 12 month period during July 2007 through June 2010. PWSs serving more than 100,000 people, and 800 representative PWSs serving 100,000 or fewer people will be required to conduct the Screening Survey for 15 chemicals ( List 2) in a 12 month period during July 2007 through June 2009. EPA will manage and pay for the monitoring required of all PWSs serving 10,000 or fewer people. UCMR 2 will generate scientifically valid data on the occurrence of 26 unregulated contaminants in drinking water, permitting assessment of potential population exposure and related contaminant levels. UCMR 2 data will be used by the Agency to determine whether to regulate these contaminants.

11. Affected public ( Mark primary with " P" and all others that apply with " X")

a. Individuals or households d. Farms b. X Business or other for profit e. Federal Government c. X Not for profit institutions f. P State, Local or Tribal Government 12. Obligation to respond ( Mark primary with " P" and all others that apply with " X") a. G Voluntary b. G Required to obtain or retain benefits c. P Mandatory 13. Annual reporting and recordkeeping hour burden a. Number of respondents 4,446 b. Total annual responses 3,745 1. Percentage of these responses collected electronically 100 % c. Total hours requested 1 d. Current OMB inventory 0 e. Difference 1 f. Explanation of difference 1. Program Change 1 2. Adjustment 0 14. Annual reporting and recordkeeping cost burden ( in thousands of dollars)

a. Total annualized capital/ startup costs $ 0 b. Total annual costs ( O& M) $ 1 c. Total annualized cost requested $ 1 d. Current OMB inventory $ 0 e. Difference $ 1 f. Explanation of difference 1. Program change $ 1 2. Adjustment $ 0 15. Purpose of information collection ( Mark Primary With " P" and all others that apply with " X") a. __ Application for benefits e. __ Program planning or management b. __ Program evaluation f. __ Research c. __ General purpose statistics g. P Regulatory or compliance d. __ Audit 16. Frequency of recordkeeping or reporting ( check all that apply) a. Q Recordkeeping b. Q Third party disclosure c.

Reporting 1. Q On occasion 2. Q Weekly 3. Q Monthly 4.

Quarterly 5.

Semi annually 6.

Annually 7. Q Biannually 8.

Other ( describe) varies by respondent 17. Statistical methods Does this information collection employ statistical methods?

Yes Q No 18. Agency contact ( person who can best answer questions regarding the content of this submission) Name: David Munch Phone: 513 569 7843 OMB 83 I 10/ 95 19. Certification for Paperwork Reduction Act Submissions On behalf of this Federal agency, 1 certify that the collection of information encompassed by this request complies with' 5 CFR 1320.9.

NOTE: The text of 5 CFR 1320.9, and the related provisions of 5 CFR 1320.8( b)( 3), appear at the end of the instructions. The certification is to be made with reference to those regulatory provisions as set forth in the instructions.

The following is a summary of the topics, regarding the proposed collection of information, that the certification covers:

( a) It is necessary for the proper performance of agency functions;

( b) It avoids unnecessary duplication;

( c) It reduces burden on small entities;

( d) It uses plain, coherent, and unambiguous terminology that is understandable to respondents;

( e) Its implementation will be consistent and compatible with current reporting and recordkeeping practices;

( f) It indicates the retention periods for recordkeeping requirements;

( g) It informs respondents of the information called for under 5 CFR 1320.8( b)( 3): ( I) Why the information is being collected' ( ii) Use of information; ( iii) Burden estimate; ( iv) Nature of response ( voluntary, required for a benefit, or mandatory); ( v) Nature and extent of confidentiality; and ( vi) Need to display currently valid OMB control number;

( h) It was developed by an office that has planned and allocated resources for the efficient and effective management and use of the information to be collected ( see note in Item 19 of the instructions);

( I) It uses effective and efficient statistical survey methodology; and ( j) It makes appropriate use of information technology.

If you are unable to certify compliance with any of these provisions, identify the item below and explain the reason in Item 18 of the Supporting Statement.

Signature of Program Official Cynthia C. Dougherty, Director, OGWDW Date Signature of Senior Official or designee Thomas Gibson, Associate Administrator Office of Policy, Economics, and Innovation?? Date OMB 83 I 10/ 95 Certification Requirement for Paperwork Reduction Act Submissions 5 CFR 1320.9 reads " As part of the agency submission to OMB of a proposed collection of information, the agency ( through the head of the agency, the Senior Official or their designee) shall certify ( and provide a record supporting such certification) that the proposed collection of information

"( a) is necessary for the proper performance of the functions of the agency, including that the information to be collected will have practical utility;

"( b) is not unnecessarily duplicative of information otherwise reasonably accessible to the agency;

"( c) reduces to the extent practicable and appropriate the burden on persons who shall provide information to or for the agency, including with respect to small entities, as defined in the Regulatory Flexibility Act 5 U. S. C. § 601( 6)), the use of such techniques as:

"( 1) establishing differing compliance or reporting requirements or timetables that take into account the resources available to those who are to respond; "( 2) the clarification, consolidation, or simplification of compliance and reporting requirements; or collection of information , or any part thereof; "( 3) an exemption from coverage of the collection of information, or any part thereof;

"( d) is written using plain, coherent, and unambiguous terminology and is understandable to those who are to respond;

"( e) is to be implemented in ways consistent and compatible, to the maximum extent practicable, with the existing reporting and recordkeeping practices of those who are to respond;

"( f) indicates for each recordkeeping requirement the length of time persons are required to maintain the records specified;

"( g) informs potential respondents of the information called for under § 1320.8( b)( 3); [ see below]

"( h) has been developed by an office that has planned and allocated resources for the efficient and effective management and use of the information to be collected, including the processing of the information in a manner which shall enhance, where appropriate, the utility of the information to agencies and the public;

"( I) uses effective and efficient statistical survey methodology appropriate to the purpose for which the information is to be collected; and "( j) to the maximum extent practicable, uses appropriate information technology to reduce burden and improve data quality, agency efficiency and responsiveness to the public."

NOTE: 5 CFR 1320.8( b)( 3) requires that each collection of information:

"( 3) informs and provides reasonable notice to the potential persons to whom the collection of information is addressed of: "( I) the reasons the information is planned to be and/ or has been used to further the proper performance of the functions of the agency; "( ii) the way such information is planned to be and/ or has been used to further the proper performance of the functions of the agency; "( iii) an estimate, to the extent practicable, of the average burden of the collection ( together with a request that the public direct to the agency any comments concerning the accuracy of this burden estimate and any suggestions for reducing this burden); "( iv) whether responses to the collection of information are voluntary, required to obtain or retain a benefit ( citing authority), or mandatory ( citing authority); "( v) the nature and extent of confidentiality to be provided, if any ( citing authority); and "( vi) the fact that any agency may not conduct or sponsor, and a person is not required to respond to, a collection of information unless it displays a currently valid OMB control number."

OMB 83 I ( Instructions) 10/ 95


[Federal Register Volume 87, Number 198 (Friday, October 14, 2022)]
[Notices]
[Page 62434]
[FR Doc No: 2022-22339]

=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY

Coast Guard

[Docket No. USCG-2021-0345]

Notice of Availability of Draft Study; Extension of Comment
Period

AGENCY: Coast Guard, DHS.

ACTION: Notice of availability and extension of comment period.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Coast Guard is extending the comment period of the draft
Pacific Coast Port Access Route Study (PAC-PARS) in order to provide
stakeholders with additional time to provide the Coast Guard with
valuable input. This study evaluates safe access routes for the
movement of vessel traffic proceeding to or from ports or places along
the western seaboard of the United States and determines whether a
shipping safety fairway (``fairway'') and/or routing measures should be
established, adjusted or modified.

DATES: Comments must be submitted to the online docket via https://www.regulations.gov on or before November 8, 2022.

ADDRESSES: You may submit comments identified by docket number USCG-
2021-0345 using the Federal Decision Making Portal at https://www.regulations.gov. See the ``Public Participation and Request for
Comments'' portion of the SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION section for further
instructions on submitting comments.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: For information about this document
call or email LCDR Sara Conrad, Coast Guard Pacific Area (PAC-54), U.S.
Coast Guard; telephone<PHONE_NUMBER>, email [email protected] or
Mr. Tyrone Conner, Eleventh Coast Guard District (dpw), U.S. Coast
Guard; telephone<PHONE_NUMBER>, email [email protected] or Mr.
John Moriarty, Thirteenth Coast Guard District (dpw), U.S. Coast Guard;
telephone<PHONE_NUMBER>, email [email protected].

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

Public Participation and Comments

    Two webinars are being offered to present the contents of the draft
study to the public and answer questions. The first webinar was held on
October 4th, 2022. The presentation slides and a recording of the
webinar are available on the PAC-PARS Homeport website here: https://cglink.uscg.mil/efedac43. The second webinar will be held on Tuesday,
October 11th, 2022 at 11:00am PST. The link to register can also be
found on the PAC-PARS Homeport website: https://cglink.uscg.mil/efedac43.
    We encourage you to submit comments (or related material) on the
draft PAC-PARS. We will consider all submissions and may adjust our
final recommendations based on your comments. If you submit a comment,
please include the docket number for this notice, indicate the specific
section of this document to which each comment applies, and provide a
reason for each suggestion or recommendation.
    Submitting comments. We encourage you to submit comments through
the Federal Decision Making Portal at http://www.regulations.gov. To do
so, go to https://www.regulations.gov, type USCG-2021-0345 in the
search box and click ``Search.'' Next, look for this document in the
Search Results column, and click on it. Then click on the Comment
option. If your material cannot be submitted using http://www.regulations.gov, contact the person in the FOR FURTHER INFORMATION
CONTACT section of this document for alternate instructions.
    Viewing material in docket. To view documents mentioned in this
notice as being available in the docket, find the docket as described
in the previous paragraph, and then select ``Supporting & Related
Material'' in the Document Type column. Public comments will also be
placed in our online docket and can be viewed by following instructions
on the https://www.regulations.gov Frequently Asked Questions web page.
We review all comments received, but we may choose not to post off-
topic, inappropriate, or duplicate comments that we receive.
    Personal information. We accept anonymous comments. Comments we
post to https://www.regulations.gov will include any personal
information you have provided. For more about privacy and submissions
in response to this document, see DHS's eRulemaking System of Records
notice (85 FR 14226, March 11, 2020).

Discussion

    The draft PAC-PARS was published on August 26, 2022 (87 FR 52587).
The original comment period closes on October 25, 2022. However, the
Coast Guard has been notified that several stakeholders would like more
time to prepare their comments on the draft study. The Coast Guard has
decided that an extension of the public comment period would be
appropriate to allow interested parties additional time to submit
comments for Coast Guard's consideration. Thus, the comment period is
extended by 14 days until November 8, 2022. This notice is issued under
authority of 46 U.S.C. 70003(c)(1).

    Dated: October 6, 2022.
L. Hannah,
Captain, U.S. Coast Guard, Chief, Pacific Area Preparedness Division.
[FR Doc. 2022-22339 Filed 10-13-22; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 9110-04-P


[Federal Register: July 8, 2008 (Volume 73, Number 131)]
[Proposed Rules]
[Page 38933-38935]
[DOCID:fr08jy08-23]

========================================================================
Proposed Rules
                                                Federal Register
________________________________________________________________________

This section of the FEDERAL REGISTER contains notices to the public of
the proposed issuance of rules and regulations. The purpose of these
notices is to give interested persons an opportunity to participate in
the rule making prior to the adoption of the final rules.

========================================================================

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION

Federal Aviation Administration

14 CFR Part 39

[Docket No. FAA-2008-0749; Directorate Identifier 2008-CE-044-AD]
RIN 2120-AA64

Airworthiness Directives; Air Tractor, Inc., Models AT-402, AT-
402A, and AT-402B Airplanes

AGENCY: Federal Aviation Administration (FAA), Department of
Transportation (DOT).

ACTION: Notice of proposed rulemaking (NPRM).

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: We propose to adopt a new airworthiness directive (AD) for
certain Air Tractor, Inc., (Air Tractor) Models AT-402, AT-402A, and
AT-402B airplanes. This proposed AD would require you to repetitively
visually inspect the rudder and vertical fin hinge attaching structure
for loose fasteners and inspect the rudder or vertical fin skins,
spars, hinges or brackets for cracks and/or corrosion. The AD would
also require you to replace any damaged parts found as a result of the
inspections and install an external doubler at the upper rudder hinge.
Installation of the external doubler at the upper rudder hinge is
terminating action for the repetitive inspection requirements. This
proposed AD results from a report of a Model AT-402 airplane with a
loose upper rudder hinge caused by fatigue. We are proposing this AD to
detect and correct loose fasteners; any cracks in the rudder or
vertical fin skins, spars, hinges or brackets; or corrosion of the
rudder and vertical fin hinge attaching structure. Hinge failure
adversely affects ability to control yaw and has led to the rudder
folding over in flight. This condition could allow the rudder to
contact the elevator and affect ability to control pitch with
consequent loss of control.

DATES: We must receive comments on this proposed AD by September 8,
2008.

ADDRESSES: Use one of the following addresses to comment on this
proposed AD:
     Federal eRulemaking Portal: Go to http://
www.regulations.gov. Follow the instructions for submitting comments.
     Fax:<PHONE_NUMBER>.
     Mail: U.S. Department of Transportation, Docket
Operations, M-30, West Building Ground Floor, Room W12-140, 1200 New
Jersey Avenue, SE., Washington, DC 20590.
     Hand Delivery: U.S. Department of Transportation, Docket
Operations, M-30, West Building Ground Floor, Room W12-140, 1200 New
Jersey Avenue, SE., Washington, DC 20590, between 9 a.m. and 5 p.m.,
Monday through Friday, except Federal holidays.
    For service information identified in this proposed AD, contact Air
Tractor, Inc., P.O. Box 485, Olney, Texas 76374; telephone: (940) 564-
5616; facsimile:<PHONE_NUMBER>.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Andrew McAnaul, Aerospace Engineer,
ASW-150 (c/o MIDO-43), 10100 Reunion Place, Suite 650, San Antonio,
Texas 78216; telephone:<PHONE_NUMBER>; facsimile:<PHONE_NUMBER>.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

Comments Invited

    We invite you to send any written relevant data, views, or
arguments regarding this proposed AD. Send your comments to an address
listed under the ADDRESSES section. Include the docket number, ``FAA-
2008-0749; Directorate Identifier 2008-CE-044-AD'' at the beginning of
your comments. We specifically invite comments on the overall
regulatory, economic, environmental, and energy aspects of the proposed
AD. We will consider all comments received by the closing date and may
amend the proposed AD in light of those comments.
    We will post all comments we receive, without change, to http://
www.regulations.gov, including any personal information you provide. We
will also post a report summarizing each substantive verbal contact we
receive concerning this proposed AD.

Discussion

    We received two reports (one Air Tractor Model AT-602 airplane and
one Model AT-802A airplane) of in-flight rudder separation at the upper
attach hinge area and other reports of Models AT-502B, AT-602, and AT-
802/802A airplanes with loose hinges, skin cracks, or signs of repairs
to the affected area.
    Hinge failure adversely affects ability to control yaw and has led
to the rudder folding over in flight. This condition could allow the
rudder to contact the elevator and affect ability to control pitch with
consequent loss of control.
    Consequently, we issued AD 2006-23-14 (71 FR 66661, November 16,
2006). AD 2006-23-14 requires you to repetitively visually inspect the
rudder and vertical fin hinge attaching structure (vertical fin skins,
spars, hinges, and brackets) for loose fasteners, cracks, and/or
corrosion. This AD also requires you to replace any damaged parts found
as a result of the inspection and install an external doubler at the
upper rudder hinge.
    Since issuing AD 2006-23-14, we have received a report of a Model
AT-402 airplane with a loose upper rudder hinge caused by fatigue.
Therefore, we are proposing this AD to address the unsafe condition on
the Model AT-402 airplanes.

Relevant Service Information

    We have reviewed Snow Engineering Co. Service Letter 247,
revised June 2, 2008; and Snow Engineering Co. Process Specification
Number 145, dated December 6, 1991. The service information describes
procedures for:
     Inspecting (visually) the rudder and fin hinge attaching
structure for loose fasteners, any cracks in the rudder or vertical fin
skins, spars, hinges or brackets, or corrosion;
     Replacing any damaged parts found as a result of the
inspection;
     Installing an external doubler at the upper rudder hinge;
and
     Balancing of the rudder.

FAA's Determination and Requirements of the Proposed AD

    We are proposing this AD because we evaluated all information and
determined the unsafe condition described previously is likely to exist
or develop on other products of the same type design. This proposed AD
would require you to repetitively visually inspect the rudder and
vertical fin hinge attaching structure for loose fasteners, any cracks
in the rudder or vertical fin skins, spars, hinges or brackets, or
corrosion. This proposed AD would also require you to replace any
damaged parts found as a result of the inspection

and install an external doubler at the upper rudder hinge. Installation
of the external doubler at the upper rudder hinge is terminating action
for the repetitive inspection requirements.

Costs of Compliance

    We estimate that this proposed AD would affect 220 airplanes in the
U.S. registry.
    We estimate the following costs to do the proposed inspection:

----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
                                                                                Total cost per   Total cost on
                  Labor cost                              Parts cost                airplane      U.S. operators
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
1 work-hour x $80 per hour = $80.............  Not applicable.................             $80          $17,600
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

    Any required repairs will vary depending upon the damage found, and
any replacements required will vary based on the results of the
inspection. Based on this, we have no way of determining the potential
repair and/or replacement costs for each airplane or the number of
airplanes that will need the repairs and/or replacements based on the
result of the inspections.
    We estimate the following costs to do the proposed installation of
the external doubler at the upper rudder hinge:

------------------------------------------------------------------------
                                                          Total cost per
              Labor cost                   Parts cost        airplane
------------------------------------------------------------------------
5 work-hours x $80 per hour = $400....            $217             $617
------------------------------------------------------------------------

Authority for this Rulemaking

    Title 49 of the United States Code specifies the FAA's authority to
issue rules on aviation safety. Subtitle I, Section 106, describes the
authority of the FAA Administrator. Subtitle VII, Aviation Programs,
describes in more detail the scope of the Agency's authority.
    We are issuing this rulemaking under the authority described in
Subtitle VII, Part A, Subpart III, Section 44701, ``General
requirements.'' Under that section, Congress charges the FAA with
promoting safe flight of civil aircraft in air commerce by prescribing
regulations for practices, methods, and procedures the Administrator
finds necessary for safety in air commerce. This regulation is within
the scope of that authority because it addresses an unsafe condition
that is likely to exist or develop on products identified in this
rulemaking action.

Regulatory Findings

    We have determined that this proposed AD would not have federalism
implications under Executive Order 13132. This proposed AD would not
have a substantial direct effect on the States, on the relationship
between the national Government and the States, or on the distribution
of power and responsibilities among the various levels of government.
    For the reasons discussed above, I certify that the proposed
regulation:
    1. Is not a ``significant regulatory action'' under Executive Order
12866;
    2. Is not a ``significant rule'' under the DOT Regulatory Policies
and Procedures (44 FR 11034, February 26, 1979); and
    3. Will not have a significant economic impact, positive or
negative, on a substantial number of small entities under the criteria
of the Regulatory Flexibility Act.
    We prepared a regulatory evaluation of the estimated costs to
comply with this proposed AD and placed it in the AD docket.

Examining the AD Docket

    You may examine the AD docket that contains the proposed AD, the
regulatory evaluation, any comments received, and other information on
the Internet at http://www.regulations.gov; or in person at the Docket
Management Facility between 9 a.m. and 5 p.m., Monday through Friday,
except Federal holidays. The Docket Office (telephone<PHONE_NUMBER>)
is located at the street address stated in the ADDRESSES section.
Comments will be available in the AD docket shortly after receipt.

List of Subjects in 14 CFR Part 39

    Air transportation, Aircraft, Aviation safety, Safety.

The Proposed Amendment

    Accordingly, under the authority delegated to me by the
Administrator, the FAA proposes to amend 14 CFR part 39 as follows:

PART 39--AIRWORTHINESS DIRECTIVES

    1. The authority citation for part 39 continues to read as follows:

    Authority: 49 U.S.C. 106(g), 40113, 44701.

Sec.  39.13  [Amended]

    2. The FAA amends Sec.  39.13 by adding the following new AD:

Air Tractor, Inc.: Docket No. FAA-2008-0749; Directorate Identifier
2008-CE-044-AD.

Comments Due Date

    (a) We must receive comments on this airworthiness directive
(AD) action by September 8, 2008.

Affected ADs

    (b) None.

Applicability

    (c) This AD applies to Models AT-402, AT-402A, and AT-402B
airplanes, serial numbers 0694 through 1176, that are certificated
in any category.

Unsafe Condition

    (d) This AD results from a report of a Model AT-402 airplane
with a loose upper rudder hinge caused by fatigue. We are issuing
this AD to detect and correct loose fasteners; any cracks in the
rudder or vertical fin skins, spars, hinges or brackets; or
corrosion of the rudder and vertical fin hinge attaching structure.
Hinge failure adversely affects ability to control yaw and has led
to the rudder folding over in flight. This condition could allow the
rudder to contact the elevator and affect ability to control pitch
with consequent loss of control.

Compliance

    (e) To address this problem, you must do the following, unless
already done:

------------------------------------------------------------------------
             Actions                  Compliance          Procedures
------------------------------------------------------------------------
(1) Inspect visually the rudder   Initially inspect   Follow Snow
 and vertical fin hinge            when the airplane   Engineering Co.
 attachment for loose fasteners;   reaches a total     Service Letter
 and inspect the rudder or         of 3,500 hours      247,
 vertical fin skins, spars,        time-in-service     revised June 2,
 hinges or brackets for cracks     (TIS) or within     2008.
 and/or corrosion.                 the next 100
                                   hours TIS after
                                   the effective
                                   date of this AD,
                                   whichever occurs
                                   later, unless
                                   already done.
                                   Thereafter,
                                   repetitively
                                   inspect at
                                   intervals not to
                                   exceed every 100
                                   hours TIS.
                                   Installation of
                                   the external
                                   doubler at the
                                   upper rudder
                                   hinge required by
                                   paragraph
                                   (e)(2)(ii) or
                                   (e)(3) of this AD
                                   is terminating
                                   action for the
                                   repetitive
                                   inspections
                                   required by this
                                   AD.
(2) If you find any damage as a   Before further      Follow Snow
 result of any inspection          flight after any    Engineering Co.
 required by paragraph (e)(1) of   inspection          Service Letter
 this AD, you must:                required by         247,
(i) Replace any damaged parts      paragraph (e)(1)    revised June 2,
 with new parts and.               of this AD where    2008; and Snow
(ii) Do the installation of the    you find any        Engineering Co.
 external doubler at the upper     damaged parts.      Process
 rudder hinge..                    The installation    Specification
                                   of the external     Number 145, dated
                                   doubler at the      December 6, 1991.
                                   upper rudder
                                   hinge required by
                                   paragraph
                                   (e)(2)(ii) or
                                   (e)(3) of this AD
                                   terminates the
                                   action for the
                                   repetitive
                                   inspections
                                   required by this
                                   AD.
(3) Do the installation of the    When the airplane   Follow Snow
 external doubler at the upper     reaches a total     Engineering Co.
 rudder hinge.                     of 5,000 hours      Service Letter
                                   TIS after the       247,
                                   effective date of   revised June 2,
                                   this AD or within   2008; and Snow
                                   the next 100        Engineering Co.
                                   hours TIS after     Process
                                   the effective       Specification
                                   date of this AD,    Number 145, dated
                                   whichever occurs    December 6, 1991.
                                   later, unless
                                   already done. The
                                   installation of
                                   the external
                                   doubler at the
                                   upper rudder
                                   hinge required by
                                   paragraph
                                   (e)(2)(ii) or
                                   (e)(3) of this AD
                                   terminates the
                                   action for the
                                   repetitive
                                   inspections
                                   required by this
                                   AD.
(4) Do not install any rudder     As of the           Not Applicable.
 without the external doubler at   effective date of
 the upper rudder hinge required   this AD.
 by paragraph (e)(3) of this AD.
------------------------------------------------------------------------

Alternative Methods of Compliance (AMOCs)

    (f) The Manager, Fort Worth Aircraft Certification Office, FAA,
has the authority to approve AMOCs for this AD, if requested using
the procedures found in 14 CFR 39.19. Send information to ATTN:
Andrew McAnaul, Aerospace Engineer, ASW-150 (c/o MIDO-43), 10100
Reunion Place, Suite 650, San Antonio, Texas 78216; telephone: (210)
308-3365; facsimile:<PHONE_NUMBER>. Before using any approved AMOC
on any airplane to which the AMOC applies, notify your appropriate
principal inspector (PI) in the FAA Flight Standards District Office
(FSDO), or lacking a PI, your local FSDO.

Related Information

    (g) To get copies of the service information referenced in this
AD, contact Air Tractor, Inc., P.O. Box 485, Olney, Texas 76374;
telephone:<PHONE_NUMBER>; facsimile:<PHONE_NUMBER>. To view the AD
docket, go to U.S. Department of Transportation, Docket Operations,
M-30, West Building Ground Floor, Room W12-140, 1200 New Jersey
Avenue, SE., Washington, DC 20590, or on the Internet at http://
www.regulations.gov.

    Issued in Kansas City, Missouri, on July 1, 2008.
John Colomy,
Acting Manager, Small Airplane Directorate, Aircraft Certification
Service.
[FR Doc. E8-15456 Filed 7-7-08; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4910-13-P


[Federal Register Volume 82, Number 103 (Wednesday, May 31, 2017)]
[Notices]
[Pages 24961-24962]
[FR Doc No: 2017-11195]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission

[Project No. 2242-078]

Eugene Water and Electric Board; Notice Soliciting Revised
Comments, Recommendations, Terms and Conditions, and Prescriptions

    Take notice that the following hydroelectric application and
revised settlement agreement have been filed with the Commission and
are available for public inspection.
    a. Type of Application: New Major License.
    b. Project No.: Project No. 2242-078.
    c. Date filed: The license application was filed on November 24,
2006; Exhibits A, C, F, and G were resubmitted on May 12. 2017. A
revised settlement agreement was filed on November 30, 2016.
    d. Applicant: Eugene Water and Electric Board.
    e. Name of Project: Carmen-Smith Hydroelectric Project.
    f. Location: On the McKenzie River in Lane and Linn counties, near
the town of McKenzie Bridge, Oregon. The project occupies approximately
560 acres of the Willamette National Forest.
    g. Filed Pursuant to: Federal Power Act 16 U.S.C. 791(a)-825(r).
    h. Applicant Contact: Frank Lawson, General Manager, Eugene Water
and Electric Board, 500 East 4th Avenue, P.O. Box 10148, Eugene, Oregon
97440-2148;<PHONE_NUMBER>.
    i. FERC Contact: Dianne Rodman<PHONE_NUMBER> or
<EMAIL_ADDRESS>    j. Deadline for filing revised comments, recommendations, terms and
conditions, and prescriptions: 60 days from the issuance date of this
notice; reply comments are due 105 days from the issuance date of this
notice.
    The Commission strongly encourages electronic filing. Please file
comments, recommendations, terms and conditions, and prescriptions
using the Commission's eFiling system at http://www.ferc.gov/docs-filing/efiling.asp. Commenters can submit brief comments up to 6,000
characters, without prior registration, using the eComment system at
http://www.ferc.gov/docs-filing/ecomment.asp. You must include your
name and contact information at the end of your comments. For
assistance, please contact FERC Online Support at
<EMAIL_ADDRESS>(866) 208-3676 (toll free), or (202) 502-
8659 (TTY). In lieu of electronic filing, please send a paper copy to:
Secretary, Federal Energy Regulatory Commission, 888 First Street NE.,
Washington, DC 20426. The first page of any filing should include
docket number P-2242-078.
    The Commission's Rules of Practice require all intervenors filing
documents with the Commission to serve a copy of that document on each
person on the official service list for the project. Further, if an
intervenor files comments or documents with the Commission relating to
the merits of an issue that may affect the responsibilities of a
particular resource agency, they must also serve a copy of the document
on that resource agency.
    k. Copies of the application and revised settlement agreement are
available for review at the Commission in the Public Reference Room or
may be viewed on the Commission's Web site at http://www.ferc.gov using
the eLibrary link. Enter the docket number excluding the last three
digits in the docket number field to access the documents. For
assistance, contact FERC Online Support. Copies are also available for
inspection and reproduction at the address in item h above.
    All filings must (1) bear in all capital letters the title
COMMENTS, REPLY COMMENTS, RECOMMENDATIONS, TERMS AND CONDITIONS, or
RESCRIPTIONS; (2) set forth in the heading the name of the applicant
and the project number of the application to which the filing responds;
(3) furnish the name, address, and telephone number of the person
submitting the filing; and (4) otherwise comply with the requirements
of 18 CFR 385.2001 through 385.2005. All comments, recommendations,
terms and conditions or prescriptions must set forth their evidentiary
basis and otherwise comply with the requirements of 18 CFR 4.34(b).
Agencies may obtain copies of the application directly from the
applicant. Each filing must be accompanied by proof of service on all
persons listed on the service list prepared by the Commission in this
proceeding, in accordance with 18 CFR 4.34(b) and 385.2010.
    You may also register online at http://www.ferc.gov/docs-filing/esubscription.asp to be notified via

email of new filings and issuances related to this or other pending
projects. For assistance, contact FERC Online Support.

    Dated: May 24, 2017.
Kimberly D. Bose,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2017-11195 Filed 5-30-17; 8:45 am]
 BILLING CODE 6717-01-P


[Federal Register Volume 82, Number 8 (Thursday, January 12, 2017)]
[Notices]
[Page 3790]
[FR Doc No: 2017-00565]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission

[Docket No. EL17-36-000]

Advanced Energy Management Alliance v. PJM Interconnection,
L.L.C.; Notice of Complaint

    Take notice that on January 5, 2017, pursuant to sections 206 and
306 of the Federal Power Act, 16 U.S.C. 824e and 825e and Rules 206 and
212 of the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission's (Commission) Rules of
Practice and Procedure, 18 CFR 385.206 and 385.212, Advanced Energy
Management Alliance (AEMA or Complainant) filed a formal complaint
against PJM Interconnection, L.L.C. (PJM or Respondent) alleging that
certain provisions of PJM's Open Access Transmission Tariff and its
Reliability Assurance Agreement are unjust, unreasonable and unduly
discriminatory, all as more fully explained in the complaint.
    The AEMA certifies that a copies of the complaint were served on
the contacts for PJM as listed on the Commission's list of Corporate
Officials.
    Any person desiring to intervene or to protest this filing must
file in accordance with Rules 211 and 214 of the Commission's Rules of
Practice and Procedure (18 CFR 385.211, 385.214). Protests will be
considered by the Commission in determining the appropriate action to
be taken, but will not serve to make protestants parties to the
proceeding. Any person wishing to become a party must file a notice of
intervention or motion to intervene, as appropriate. The Respondent's
answer and all interventions, or protests must be filed on or before
the comment date. The Respondent's answer, motions to intervene, and
protests must be served on the Complainants.
    The Commission encourages electronic submission of protests and
interventions in lieu of paper using the ``eFiling'' link at http://www.ferc.gov. Persons unable to file electronically should submit an
original and 5 copies of the protest or intervention to the Federal
Energy Regulatory Commission, 888 First Street NE., Washington, DC
20426.
    This filing is accessible on-line at http://www.ferc.gov, using the
``eLibrary'' link and is available for electronic review in the
Commission's Public Reference Room in Washington, DC. There is an
``eSubscription'' link on the Web site that enables subscribers to
receive email notification when a document is added to a subscribed
docket(s). For assistance with any FERC Online service, please email
<EMAIL_ADDRESS>or call<PHONE_NUMBER> (toll free). For
TTY, call<PHONE_NUMBER>.
    Comment Date: 5:00 p.m. Eastern Time on January 25, 2017.

    Dated: January 6, 2017.
Kimberly D. Bose,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2017-00565 Filed 1-11-17; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6717-01-P