' 4 1.

2.

3.

4.

5.

6.

7. Endocrine Disruptor Methods Validation Subcommittee Resource Book July 23 24,2002 Table of Contents Cf a. General Procedural P%;

1.2 March 25 27 2002 EDMVS Final Meeting Summary 1.3 EDMVS Work Plan, revised 1.4 Criteria  or Screens Presentation  Review the EDSTAC Recommendations 1.1 Proposed Agenda , F *,.

i,,$,+,?. e: 4'

pi4 .**;' B: :% , ~ y :,"'> , . & 9 , ,. ,+ 5 rr,.: "+

s:: +$'

p p r;> zit; $""! e.': T? u1 CT; Pubertals  Special Study: Restricted Feeding ( Tier I) 2.1 ( Report will be made available upon finalization) 2.2 Pubertals  Special Study: Restricted Feeding Questions ICCVAM NICEATM  In Vitro EIUAR Assays 3.1 Estrogen Receptor Binding Assays  Executive Summary 3.2 Androgen Receptor Binding Assays  Executive Summary 3.3 Estrogen Receptor Transcriptional Activation Assays  Executive 3.4 Androgen Receptor Transcriptional Activation Assays  Executive summary summary General Dose Setting Issues 4.1 Dose Setting Discussion Paper 4.2 General Dose Setting Questions Mammalian 2 Generation  PTU Special Study ( Tier 11) 5.1 Mammalian 2 Generation  PTU Special Study Report 5.2 Mammalian 2 Generation  PTU Special Study Questions Amphibian Metamorphosis Detailed Review Paper ( Tier I) 6.1 Amphibian Metamorphosis Detailed Review Paper 6.2 Amphibian Metamorphosis Questions Invertebrate Detailed Review Paper ( Tier 11) 7.1 Invertebrate Detailed Review Paper 7.2 Invertebrate Questions . le

i


[Federal Register Volume 77, Number 162 (Tuesday, August 21, 2012)]
[Notices]
[Pages 50497-50499]
[FR Doc No: 2012-20506]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY

[EPA-HQ-RCRA-2012-0187; FRL-9522-1]

Agency Information Collection Activities; Submission to OMB for
Review and Approval; Comment Request; General Hazardous Waste Facility
Standards (Renewal)

AGENCY: Environmental Protection Agency (EPA).

ACTION: Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: In compliance with the Paperwork Reduction Act (PRA) (44
U.S.C. 3501 et seq.), this document

announces that an Information Collection Request (ICR) has been
forwarded to the Office of Management and Budget (OMB) for review and
approval. This is a request to renew an existing approved collection.
The ICR, which is abstracted below, describes the nature of the
information collection and its estimated burden and cost.

DATES: Additional comments may be submitted on or before September 20,
2012.

ADDRESSES: Submit your comments, referencing Docket ID No. EPA-HQ-RCRA-
2012-0187, to (1) EPA, either online using www.regulations.gov (our
preferred method), by email to<EMAIL_ADDRESS>or by mail to: RCRA
Docket (28221T), U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, 1200
Pennsylvania Avenue NW., Washington, DC 20460; and (2) OMB, by mail to:
Office of Information and Regulatory Affairs, Office of Management and
Budget (OMB), Attention: Desk Officer for EPA, 725 17th Street NW.,
Washington, DC 20503.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Norma Abdul-Malik, Environmental
Protection Agency, 1200 Pennsylvania Ave. NW., Washington, DC 20460;
telephone number:<PHONE_NUMBER>; fax number:<PHONE_NUMBER>; email
address<EMAIL_ADDRESS>
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: EPA has submitted the following ICR to OMB
for review and approval according to the procedures prescribed in 5 CFR
1320.12. On April 5, 2012 (77 FR 20623), EPA sought comments on this
ICR pursuant to 5 CFR 1320.8(d). EPA received one comment, which has
been addressed in the ICR. Any additional comments on this ICR should
be submitted to EPA and OMB within 30 days of this notice.
    EPA has established a public docket for this ICR under Docket ID No
EPA-HQ-RCRA-2012-0187, which is available for online viewing at
www.regulations.gov, or in person viewing at the Resource Conservation
and Recovery Act (RCRA) Docket in the EPA Docket Center (EPA/DC), EPA
West, Room 3334, 1301 Constitution Ave. NW., Washington, DC. The EPA/DC
Public Reading Room is open from 8:30 a.m. to 4:30 p.m., Monday through
Friday, excluding legal holidays. The telephone number for the Reading
Room is<PHONE_NUMBER>, and the telephone number for the RCRA Docket is
(202) 566-0270.
    Use EPA's electronic docket and comment system at
www.regulations.gov, to submit or view public comments, access the
index listing of the contents of the docket, and to access those
documents in the docket that are available electronically. Once in the
system, select ``docket search,'' then key in the docket ID number
identified above. Please note that EPA's policy is that public
comments, whether submitted electronically or in paper, will be made
available for public viewing at www.regulations.gov as EPA receives
them and without change, unless the comment contains copyrighted
material, Confidential Business Information (CBI), or other information
whose public disclosure is restricted by statute. For further
information about the electronic docket, go to www.regulations.gov.
    Title: General Hazardous Waste Facility Standards (Renewal).
    ICR numbers: EPA ICR No. 1571.10, OMB Control No. 2050-0120.
    ICR Status: This ICR is scheduled to expire on August 31, 2012.
Under OMB regulations, the Agency may continue to conduct or sponsor
the collection of information while this submission is pending at OMB.
An Agency may not conduct or sponsor, and a person is not required to
respond to, a collection of information, unless it displays a currently
valid OMB control number. The OMB control numbers for EPA's regulations
in title 40 of the CFR, after appearing in the Federal Register when
approved, are listed in 40 CFR part 9, are displayed either by
publication in the Federal Register or by other appropriate means, such
as on the related collection instrument or form, if applicable. The
display of OMB control numbers in certain EPA regulations is
consolidated in 40 CFR part 9.
    Abstract: Section 3004 of the Resource Conservation and Recovery
Act (RCRA), as amended, requires that the EPA develop standards for
hazardous waste treatment, storage, and disposal facilities (TSDFs) as
may be necessary to protect human health and the environment.
Subsections 3004(a)(1), (3), (4), (5), and (6) specify that these
standards include, but not be limited to, the following requirements:
     Maintaining records of all hazardous wastes identified or
listed under subtitle C that are treated, stored, or disposed of, and
the manner in which such wastes were treated, stored, or disposed of;
     Operating methods, techniques, and practices for
treatment, storage, or disposal of hazardous waste;
     Location, design, and construction of such hazardous waste
treatment, disposal, or storage facilities;
     Contingency plans for effective action to minimize
unanticipated damage from any treatment, storage, or disposal of any
such hazardous waste; and
     Maintaining or operating such facilities and requiring
such additional qualifications as to ownership, continuity of
operation, training for personnel, and financial responsibility as may
be necessary or desirable.
    The regulations implementing these requirements are codified in 40
CFR parts 264 and 265. The collection of this information enables EPA
to properly determine whether owners/operators or hazardous waste
treatment, storage, and disposal facilities meet the requirements of
Section 3004(a) of RCRA.
    Burden Statement: The annual public reporting and recordkeeping
burden for this collection of information is estimated to average 359
hours per response. The annual public reporting burden is estimated to
average 293 hours per respondent, and the annual public recordkeeping
burden is estimated to average 66 hours per respondent. Burden means
the total time, effort, or financial resources expended by persons to
generate, maintain, retain, or disclose or provide information to or
for a Federal agency. This includes the time needed to review
instructions; develop, acquire, install, and utilize technology and
systems for the purposes of collecting, validating, and verifying
information, processing and maintaining information, and disclosing and
providing information; adjust the existing ways to comply with any
previously applicable instructions and requirements which have
subsequently changed; train personnel to be able to respond to a
collection of information; search data sources; complete and review the
collection of information; and transmit or otherwise disclose the
information.
    Respondents/Affected Entities: Businesses and other for-profits, as
well as State, Local, and Tribal governments.
    Estimated Number of Respondents: 1,872.
    Frequency of Response: On occasion.
    Estimated Total Annual Hour Burden: 672,417 hours.
    Estimated Total Annual Cost: $40,676,696 which includes $40,143,171
annualized labor costs and $533,525 annualized capital or O&M costs.
    Changes in the Estimates: There is an increase of 94,036 hours in
the total estimated burden currently identified in the OMB Inventory of
Approved ICR Burdens. The reason for this increase is

the inclusion of State Agency hours in this renewal.

John Moses,
Director, Collection Strategies Division.
[FR Doc. 2012-20506 Filed 8-20-12; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6560-50-P


[Federal Register Volume 81, Number 206 (Tuesday, October 25, 2016)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Pages 73340-73341]
[FR Doc No: 2016-25703]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION

Federal Aviation Administration

14 CFR Part 71

[Docket No. FAA-2016-7046; Airspace Docket No. 16-ANM-3]

Amendment of Class E Airspace; Miles City, MT

AGENCY: Federal Aviation Administration (FAA), DOT.

ACTION: Final rule.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: This action modifies Class E surface area airspace and Class E
airspace extending upward from 700 feet above the surface at Frank
Wiley Field Airport, Miles City, MT, due to airspace redesign for the
safety and management of Instrument Flight Rules (IFR) operations at
the airport. The Class E airspace designated as an extension, proposed
for revocation in the NPRM, is removed from this rulemaking as it was
proposed in error.

DATES: Effective 0901 UTC, January 5, 2017. The Director of the Federal
Register approves this incorporation by reference action under Title 1,
Code of Federal Regulations, part 51, subject to the annual revision of
FAA Order 7400.11 and publication of conforming amendments.

ADDRESSES: FAA Order 7400.11A, Airspace Designations and Reporting
Points, and subsequent amendments can be viewed online at http://www.faa.gov/air_traffic/publications/. For further information, you can
contact the U.S. Department of Transportation, Docket Operations, 1200
New Jersey Avenue SE., West Bldg. Ground Floor Rm. W12-140, Washington,
DC 20590; Telephone: 1-800-647-5527, or<PHONE_NUMBER>. The Order is also
available for inspection at the National Archives and Records
Administration (NARA). For information on the availability of FAA Order
7400.11A at NARA, call<PHONE_NUMBER>, or go to http://www.archives.gov/federal_register/code_of_federal-regulations/ibr_locations.html. FAA
Order 7400.11, Airspace Designations and Reporting Points, is published
yearly and effective on September 15.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Tom Clark, Federal Aviation
Administration, Operations Support Group, Western Service Center, 1601
Lind Avenue SW., Renton, WA 98057; telephone<PHONE_NUMBER>.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

Authority for This Rulemaking

    The FAA's authority to issue rules regarding aviation safety is
found in Title 49 of the United States Code. Subtitle I, Section 106
describes the authority of the FAA Administrator. Subtitle VII,
Aviation Programs, describes in more detail the scope of the agency's
authority. This rulemaking is promulgated under the authority described
in Subtitle VII, Part A, Subpart I, Section 40103. Under that section,
the FAA is charged with prescribing regulations to assign the use of
airspace necessary to ensure the safety of aircraft and the efficient
use of airspace. This regulation is within the scope of that authority
as it modifies controlled airspace at Frank Wiley Field Airport, Miles
City, MT.

History

    On June 17, 2016, the FAA published in the Federal Register a
notice of proposed rulemaking (NPRM) (81 FR 39603) Docket No. FAA-2016-
7046, to modify Class E airspace extending upward from the surface,
remove Class E airspace designated as an extension to Class E surface
airspace, and modify Class E airspace extending upward from 700 feet
above the surface at Frank Wiley Field Airport, Miles City, MT.
Subsequent to publication, the FAA found that there is no Class E
airspace designated as an extension to the Class E surface area
airspace at the airport and was added in error. Interested parties were
invited to participate in this rulemaking effort by submitting written
comments on the proposal to the FAA. No comments were received.
    Class E airspace designations are published in paragraph 6002, and
6005,

respectively, of FAA Order 7400.11A, dated August 3, 2016, and
effective September 15, 2016, which is incorporated by reference in 14
CFR part 71.1. The Class E airspace designations listed in this
document will be published subsequently in the Order.

Availability and Summary of Documents for Incorporation by Reference

    This document amends FAA Order 7400.11A, Airspace Designations and
Reporting Points, dated August 3, 2016, and effective September 15,
2016. FAA Order 7400.11A is publicly available as listed in the
ADDRESSES section of this document. FAA Order 7400.11A lists Class A,
B, C, D, and E airspace areas, air traffic service routes, and
reporting points.

The Rule

    This amendment to Title 14, Code of Federal Regulations (14 CFR)
part 71 modifies Class E surface area airspace, and Class E airspace
extending upward from 700 feet above the surface at Frank Wiley Field
Airport, Miles City, MT. The Class E surface area airspace is modified
to within a 5-mile radius of Frank Wiley Field Airport to support
terminal operations below 700 feet above the surface and to account for
rising terrain. Additionally, Class E airspace extending upward from
700 feet above the surface is modified to within an 8-mile radius of
Frank Wiley Field Airport to support IFR departures below 1,200 feet
above the surface due to rising terrain. After a review of the
airspace, the FAA found redesign of the airspace necessary for the
safety and management of IFR operations at the airport. Class E
airspace designated as an extension is removed from this rulemaking as
the airspace was added in error.
    Class E airspace designations are published in paragraph 6002, and
6005, respectively, of FAA Order 7400.11A, dated August 3, 2016, and
effective September 15, 2016, which is incorporated by reference in 14
CFR 71.1. The Class E airspace designations listed in this document
will be published subsequently in the Order.

Regulatory Notices and Analyses

    The FAA has determined that this regulation only involves an
established body of technical regulations for which frequent and
routine amendments are necessary to keep them operationally current, is
non-controversial and unlikely to result in adverse or negative
comments. It, therefore: (1) Is not a ``significant regulatory action''
under Executive Order 12866; (2) is not a ``significant rule'' under
DOT Regulatory Policies and Procedures (44 FR 11034; February 26,
1979); and (3) does not warrant preparation of a Regulatory Evaluation
as the anticipated impact is so minimal. Since this is a routine matter
that only affects air traffic procedures and air navigation, it is
certified that this rule, when promulgated, does not have a significant
economic impact on a substantial number of small entities under the
criteria of the Regulatory Flexibility Act.

Environmental Review

    The FAA has determined that this action qualifies for categorical
exclusion under the National Environmental Policy Act in accordance
with FAA Order 1050.1F, ``Environmental Impacts: Policies and
Procedures,'' paragraph 5-6.5a. This airspace action is not expected to
cause any potentially significant environmental impacts, and no
extraordinary circumstances exist that warrant preparation of an
environmental assessment.

Lists of Subjects in 14 CFR Part 71

    Airspace, Incorporation by reference, Navigation (air).

Adoption of the Amendment

    In consideration of the foregoing, the Federal Aviation
Administration amends 14 CFR part 71 as follows:

PART 71--DESIGNATION OF CLASS A, B, C, D, AND E AIRSPACE AREAS; AIR
TRAFFIC SERVICE ROUTES; AND REPORTING POINTS

0
 1. The authority citation for Part 71 continues to read as follows:

     Authority:  49 U.S.C. 106(f), 106(g); 40103, 40113, 40120; E.O.
10854, 24 FR 9565, 3 CFR, 1959-1963 Comp., p. 389.

Sec.  71.1   [Amended]

0
2. The incorporation by reference in 14 CFR 71.1 of FAA Order 7400.11A,
Airspace Designations and Reporting Points, dated August 3, 2016, and
effective September 15, 2016, is amended as follows:

Paragraph 6002 Class E Airspace Designated as Surface Areas.

* * * * *

ANM MT E2 Miles City, MT [Modified]

Miles City, Frank Wiley Field, MT
    (Lat. 46[deg]25'41'' N., long. 105[deg]53'10'' W.)

    That airspace extending upward from the surface within a 5-mile
radius of Frank Wiley Field.

Paragraph 6005 Class E Airspace Areas Extending Upward From 700
Feet or More Above the Surface of the Earth.

* * * * *

ANM MT E5 Miles City, MT [Modified]

Miles City, Frank Wiley Field, MT
    (Lat. 46[deg]25'41'' N., long. 105[deg]53'10'' W.)

    That airspace extending upward from 700 feet above the surface
within an 8-mile radius of Frank Wiley Field; and that airspace
extending upward from 1,200 feet above the surface within a 34.5-
mile radius of Frank Wiley Field.

    Issued in Seattle, Washington, on October 12, 2016.
Tracey Johnson,
Manager, Operations Support Group, Western Service Center.
[FR Doc. 2016-25703 Filed 10-24-16; 8:45 am]
 BILLING CODE 4910-13-P


[Federal Register Volume 88, Number 38 (Monday, February 27, 2023)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Pages 12133-12134]
[FR Doc No: 2023-03980]

========================================================================
Rules and Regulations
                                                Federal Register
________________________________________________________________________

This section of the FEDERAL REGISTER contains regulatory documents
having general applicability and legal effect, most of which are keyed
to and codified in the Code of Federal Regulations, which is published
under 50 titles pursuant to 44 U.S.C. 1510.

The Code of Federal Regulations is sold by the Superintendent of Documents.

========================================================================

Federal Register / Vol. 88, No. 38 / Monday, February 27, 2023 /
Rules and Regulations

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION

Federal Aviation Administration

14 CFR Part 25

[Docket No. FAA-2022-0349; Special Conditions No. 25-820-SC]

Special Conditions: Airbus Model A321neo XLR Airplane; Flight-
Envelope Protection Functions--General

AGENCY: Federal Aviation Administration (FAA), Department of
Transportation (DOT).

ACTION: Final special conditions.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: These special conditions are issued for the Airbus Model
A321neo XLR airplanes. These airplanes will have a novel or unusual
design feature when compared to the state of technology envisioned in
the airworthiness standards for transport-category airplanes. This
design feature is an electronic flight-control system that provides
flight-envelope protections. The applicable airworthiness regulations
do not contain adequate or appropriate safety standards for this design
feature. These special conditions contain the additional safety
standards that the Administrator considers necessary to establish a
level of safety equivalent to that established by the existing
airworthiness standards.

DATES: Effective March 29, 2023.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Troy Brown, Performance and
Environment Section, AIR-625, Technical Innovation Policy Branch,
Policy and Innovation Division, Aircraft Certification Service, Federal
Aviation Administration, 1801 S Airport Rd., Wichita, KS 67209-2190;
telephone and fax<PHONE_NUMBER>; email [email protected].

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

Background

    On September 16, 2019, Airbus applied for an amendment to Type
Certificate No. A28NM to include the new Model A321neo XLR airplane.
These airplanes are twin-engine, transport-category airplanes with
seating for 244 passengers and a maximum takeoff weight of 222,000
pounds.

Type Certification Basis

    Under the provisions of 14 CFR 21.101, Airbus must show that the
Model A321neo XLR airplanes meet the applicable provisions of the
regulations listed in Type Certificate No. A28NM, or the applicable
regulations in effect on the date of application for the change, except
for earlier amendments as agreed upon by the FAA.
    If the Administrator finds that the applicable airworthiness
regulations (e.g., 14 CFR part 25) do not contain adequate or
appropriate safety standards for the Airbus Model A321neo XLR airplanes
because of a novel or unusual design feature, special conditions are
prescribed under the provisions of Sec.  21.16.
    Special conditions are initially applicable to the model for which
they are issued. Should the type certificate for that model be amended
later to include any other model that incorporates the same novel or
unusual design feature, or should any other model already included on
the same type certificate be modified to incorporate the same novel or
unusual design feature, these special conditions would also apply to
the other model under Sec.  21.101.
    In addition to the applicable airworthiness regulations and special
conditions, the Airbus Model A321neo XLR airplanes must comply with the
fuel-vent and exhaust-emission requirements of 14 CFR part 34, and the
noise-certification requirements of 14 CFR part 36.
    The FAA issues special conditions, as defined in Sec.  11.19, in
accordance with Sec.  11.38, and they become part of the type
certification basis under Sec.  21.101.

Novel or Unusual Design Features

    The Airbus Model A321neo XLR airplanes will incorporate the
following novel or unusual design feature:
    An electronic flight-control system that provides flight envelope
protections.

Discussion

    Many new transport-category airplanes use advanced electronic
flight-control systems (EFCS), which incorporate flight-envelope
protection (limiting) designed to prevent the pilot from inadvertently
or intentionally exceeding any number of flight-envelope parameters.
Depending on a particular EFCS design, these limiting features may or
may not be active in all normal and alternate flight-control modes, and
may or may not be capable of being overridden by the pilot.
    The FAA currently applies 14 CFR 25.143 to airplanes incorporating
EFCS. The purpose of Sec.  25.143 is to verify that operational
maneuvers conducted within the operational envelope can be accomplished
smoothly with average piloting skill, and without encountering a stall
warning or other characteristics that might interfere with normal
maneuvering, or without exceeding structural limits. The airplane
response to control input should be predictable to the pilot. However,
Sec.  25.143 does not adequately ensure that airplanes incorporating
EFCS with flight-envelope protections will have a level of safety
equivalent to that of existing standards.
    Envelope-protection functions are intended to reduce the likelihood
of excursions, either commanded or uncommanded, to unintended or
potentially hazardous airplane operating states. As a consequence of
preventing excursions, these functions can also restrict aircraft
maneuverability, and may introduce non-traditional behavior. The
special conditions will ensure that flight-envelope protection
functions support safe operation, and do not interfere with required
maneuvering in normal and emergency operations, and in forseeable
atmospheric conditions.
    The FAA previously issued separate special conditions for general
limiting, normal load-factor limiting, high-speed limiting, and pitch
and roll limiting for airplanes incorporating flight-envelope
protection features. However, the FAA tasked the Aviation Rulemaking
Advisory Committee (ARAC) in April 2014 (79 FR 20295) to develop
recommended standards for fly-by-wire flight controls for general
flight-envelope protection (limiting) similar to those provided for
conventional control functions in 14 CFR 25.143. The ARAC
recommended,\2\ among other things,

performance-based requirements that would encompass general limiting,
normal load-factor limiting, high-speed limiting, and pitch and roll
limiting which the FAA previously issued as separate special
conditions. These proposed special conditions are based on that ARAC
recommendation.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \2\ FAA Aviation Rulemaking Advisory Committee, FTHWG Topic 1
Envelope Protection, Recommendation Report--Rev. A, March, 2017,
https://www.faa.gov/regulations_policies/rulemaking/committees/documents/media/09%20-%20FTHWG_Final_Report_Phase_2_RevA__Apr_2017.pdf.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    These special conditions provide the same level of safety as the
prescriptive, design-specific special conditions the FAA has issued in
the past for general limiting, normal load-factor limiting, high-speed
limiting, and pitch and roll limiting, thus the FAA need not issue
separate special conditions to address each of these areas.
    These special conditions are in addition to the requirements of
Sec.  25.143.
    These special conditions contain the additional safety standards
that the Administrator considers necessary to establish a level of
safety equivalent to that established by the existing airworthiness
standards.

Discussion of Comments

    The FAA issued notice of proposed Special Conditions No. 25-22-05-
SC for the Airbus Model A321neo XLR airplane, which was published in
the Federal Register on November 17, 2022 (87 FR 68942).
    The FAA received one response from the Air Line Pilots Association
supporting the special conditions. The special conditions are adopted
as proposed.

Applicability

    As discussed above, these special conditions apply to Airbus Model
A321neo XLR airplanes. Should Airbus apply later for a change to the
type certificate to include another model incorporating the same novel
or unusual design feature, the special conditions would apply to that
model as well.

Conclusion

    This action affects only certain novel or unusual design features
on one model series of airplanes. It is not a rule of general
applicability.

List of Subjects in 14 CFR Part 25

    Aircraft, Aviation safety, Reporting and recordkeeping
requirements.

Authority Citation

    The authority citation for these special conditions is as follows:

    Authority: 49 U.S.C. 106(f), 106(g), 40113, 44701, 44702, 44704.

The Special Conditions

    Accordingly, pursuant to the authority delegated to me by the
Administrator, the following special conditions are issued as part of
the type certification basis for Airbus Model A321neo XLR airplanes
equipped with EFCS.
    In addition to Sec.  25.143, the following requirements apply:
    (a) Envelope protection functions must not unduly limit the
maneuvering capability of the airplane, nor interfere with its ability
to perform maneuvers required for normal and emergency operations.
    (b) Onset characteristics of each flight-envelope protection
function must be appropriate to the phase of flight and type of
maneuver, and must not conflict with the ability of the pilot to
satisfactorily control the airplane flight path, speed, and attitude.
    (c) Excursions of a limited flight parameter beyond its nominal
design-limit value due to dynamic maneuvering, airframe and system
tolerances, and non-steady atmospheric conditions must not result in
unsafe flight characteristics or conditions.
    (d) Operation of flight-envelope protection functions must not
adversely affect aircraft control during expected levels of atmospheric
disturbances, nor impede the application of recovery procedures in case
of wind shear.
    (e) Simultaneous action of flight-envelope protection functions
must not result in adverse coupling or adverse priority.
    (f) In case of abnormal attitude or excursion of flight parameters
outside the protected boundaries, operation of flight-envelope
protection functions must not hinder airplane recovery.

    Issued in Kansas City, Missouri, on February 22, 2023.
Patrick R. Mullen,
Manager, Technical Innovation Policy Branch, Policy and Innovation
Division, Aircraft Certification Service.
[FR Doc. 2023-03980 Filed 2-24-23; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910-13-P


[Federal Register Volume 85, Number 179 (Tuesday, September 15, 2020)]
[Notices]
[Page 57266]
[FR Doc No: C1-2020-17352]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

[Release No. 34-89471; File No. SR-CboeBZX-2020-057]

Self-Regulatory Organizations; Cboe BZX Exchange, Inc.; Notice of
Filing and Immediate Effectiveness of a Proposed Rule Change To Amend
the Options Regulatory Fee

August 4, 2020.

Correction

    In notice document 2020-17352 appearing on pages 49405-49407 in the
issue of August 13, 2020, make the following correction:
    On page 49405, in the first column, the File No. in the heading is
corrected to read as set forth above.
[FR Doc. C1-2020-17352 Filed 9-14-20; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 1301-00-D