[Federal Register Volume 82, Number 185 (Tuesday, September 26, 2017)]
[Notices]
[Pages 44871-44873]
[FR Doc No: 2017-20525]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION

Federal Motor Carrier Safety Administration

[Docket No. FMCSA-2017-0270]

Hours of Service of Drivers: National Tank Truck Carriers;
Application for Exemption

AGENCY: Federal Motor Carrier Safety Administration (FMCSA), DOT.

ACTION: Notice of application for exemption; request for comments.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: FMCSA announces that it has received an application from the
National Tank Truck Carriers, Inc. (NTTC) requesting exemption from the
requirement that drivers of commercial motor vehicles (CMVs) obtain a
30-minute rest break. The exemption would enable drivers engaged in the
transportation of petroleum-based fuels to use 30 minutes of time
attending the load to satisfy the 30-minute rest break requirement.
FMCSA requests public comment on NTTC's application for exemption.

DATES: Comments must be received on or before October 26, 2017.

ADDRESSES: You may submit comments identified by Federal Docket
Management System Number FMCSA-2017-0270 by any of the following
methods:
     Federal eRulemaking Portal: www.regulations.gov. See the
Public Participation and Request for Comments section below for further
information.
     Mail: Docket Management Facility, U.S. Department of
Transportation, 1200 New Jersey Avenue SE., West Building, Ground
Floor, Room W12-140, Washington, DC 20590-0001.
     Hand Delivery or Courier: West Building, Ground Floor,
Room W12-140, 1200 New Jersey Avenue SE., between 9 a.m. and 5 p.m. ET,
Monday through Friday, except Federal holidays.
     Fax: 1-202-493-2251.
    Each submission must include the Agency name and the docket number
for this notice. DOT posts all comments received without change to
www.regulations.gov. This includes any personal information contained
in a comment. Please see the Privacy Act heading below.
    Docket: For access to the docket to read background documents or

comments, go to www.regulations.gov at any time or visit Room W12-140
on the ground level of the West Building, 1200 New Jersey Avenue SE.,
Washington, DC, between 9 a.m. and 5 p.m., ET, Monday through Friday,
except Federal holidays. The on-line FDMS is available 24 hours each
day, 365 days each year.
    Privacy Act: In accordance with 5 U.S.C. 553(c), DOT solicits
comments from the public to better inform its rulemaking process. DOT
posts these comments, without edit, including any personal information
the commenter provides, to www.regulations.gov, as described in the
system of records notice (DOT/ALL-14 FDMS), which can be reviewed at
www.dot.gov/privacy.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: For information concerning this
notice, please contact Mr. Tom Yager, Chief, FMCSA Driver and Carrier
Operations Division; Telephone:<PHONE_NUMBER>; Email<EMAIL_ADDRESS>
If you have questions on viewing or submitting material to the docket,
contact Docket Services, telephone<PHONE_NUMBER>.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

Public Participation and Request for Comments

    FMCSA encourages you to participate by submitting comments and
related materials.

Submitting Comments

    If you submit a comment, please include the docket number for this
notice (FMCSA-2017-0270), indicate the specific section of this
document to which the comment applies, and provide a reason for
suggestions or recommendations. You may submit your comments and
material online or by fax, mail, or hand delivery, but please use only
one of these means. FMCSA recommends that you include your name and a
mailing address, an email address, or a phone number in the body of
your document so the Agency can contact you if it has questions
regarding your submission.
    To submit your comment online, go to www.regulations.gov and put
the docket number, ``FMCSA-2017-0270'' in the ``Keyword'' box, and
click ``Search.'' When the new screen appears, click on ``Comment
Now!'' button and type your comment into the text box in the following
screen. Choose whether you are submitting your comment as an individual
or on behalf of a third party and then submit. If you submit your
comments by mail or hand delivery, submit them in an unbound format, no
larger than 8\1/2\ by 11 inches, suitable for copying and electronic
filing. If you submit comments by mail and would like to know that they
reached the facility, please enclose a stamped, self-addressed postcard
or envelope. FMCSA will consider all comments and material received
during the comment period and may grant or not grant this application
based on your comments.

Legal Basis

    FMCSA has authority under 49 U.S.C. 31136(e) and 31315 to grant
exemptions from certain Federal Motor Carrier Safety Regulations
(FMCSRs). FMCSA must publish a notice of each exemption request in the
Federal Register (49 CFR 381.315(a)). The Agency must provide the
public an opportunity to inspect the information relevant to the
application, including any safety analyses that have been conducted.
The Agency must also provide an opportunity for public comment on the
request.
    The Agency reviews safety analyses and public comments submitted,
and determines whether granting the exemption would likely achieve a
level of safety equivalent to, or greater than, the level that would be
achieved by the current regulation (49 CFR 381.305). The decision of
the Agency must be published in the Federal Register (49 CFR
381.315(b)) with the reasons for denying or granting the application
and, if granted, the name of the person or class of persons receiving
the exemption, and the regulatory provision from which the exemption is
granted. The notice must also specify the effective period (up to 5
years) and explain the terms and conditions of the exemption. The
exemption may be renewed (49 CFR 381.300(b)).

Background

    The HOS rules require most interstate drivers to maintain a record
of duty status (RODS) on board the CMV at all times. This record, or
log, must reflect the driver's duty status on that date and for the
preceding 7 (or in some cases, 8) days. However, the HOS rules provide
an exception to this rule--the 100 air-mile radius exception (49 CFR
395.1(e)(1)). This provision relieves CMV drivers of the duty to
maintain a log if they remain within a 100 air-mile radius of the
normal work reporting location during the duty day and return to the
work-reporting location and quit work within 12 hours. The motor
carrier must maintain at the principal place of business a record of
the time the driver came on duty, the time the driver was released from
duty, and the total number of hours the driver was on duty. The HOS
rules include a requirement that drivers of property-carrying CMVs take
a rest break of at least 30 minutes if 8 hours have passed since the
end of the driver's last off-duty or sleeper-berth period of at least
30 minutes. However, the requirement to take a minimm 30 minute rest
break does not apply to drivers operating within the 100 air-mile
radius ``short haul'' exemption area.

Request for Exemption

    Applicant NTTC seeks exemption from the 30-minute rest break
provision on behalf of motor carriers and drivers engaged in the
transportation of petroleum-based products. While it estimates that
38,000 tractors perform these operations daily, the number that would
require the exemption would be much smaller. NTTC explains that most
drivers engaged in the transportation of petroleum products by CMV
qualify for the 100 air-mile exception and thus are not required to
observe a 30-minute break. However, on rare occasions, a driver does
not qualify for the 100 air-mile exception, usually because unexpected
interruptions to the workday stretch the driver's duty day beyond the
12-hour limit of that exception. When this occurs, the driver is
required to go off duty for at least 30 minutes. However, even if the
driver parks the CMV, he or she must attend it because it is an HM
load, and a driver who is attending a load is not considered off duty.
NTTC seeks exemption for these drivers to allow them to proceed without
observing a 30-minute off-duty break. It asks that these drivers be
able to designate a period of on-duty waiting time of at least 30
minutes duration to satisfy the rest-break requirement, provided the
only work performed during that time is attending the HM load. NTTC
indicates that the typical workday of these drivers consists of loading
petroleum fuel at one location and then delivering it to 3 or 4 service
stations. Some, if not all, of these stops exceed 30 minutes, during
which the driver is often only attending the load. NTTC describes this
waiting time as restful because the driver is otherwise free to engage
in activities such as eating and making personal phone calls.
    NTTC asserts that exemption for these drivers will result in a
level of safety that is equivalent to that achieved without the
exemption. It asserts that considerable time is required to locate a
suitably secure location for parking an HM load so that the driver can
go off duty. NTTC believes that the considerable, additional movement
of the CMV for this purpose increases the risk of a crash. It also
asserts that the safest approach is to keep the CMV moving toward its
destination and cites two authorities for its position. It first

cites the Transportation Security Administration's warning to truckers
that vehicles transporting HM are ``targets of choice'' for terrorists
and thus should not be parked en route. Second, NTTC cites a regulation
of the Pipeline and Hazardous Materials Safety Administration (US DOT)
stating that ``[a]ll shipments of hazardous materials must be
transported without unnecessary delay, from and including the time of
commencement of the loading of the hazardous material until its final
unloading at destination'' (49 CFR 177.800(d)). For these reasons, NTTC
believes that its drivers should not be required to take a rest break
when they discover that they are no longer eligible for the short-haul
exemption.
    NTTC seeks exemption for the maximum period of 5 years. A copy of
NTTC's application for exemption is available in the docket of this
matter.

    Issued on: September 18, 2017
Larry W. Minor,
Associate Administrator for Policy.
[FR Doc. 2017-20525 Filed 9-25-17; 8:45 am]
 BILLING CODE 4910-EX-P


[Federal Register Volume 82, Number 55 (Thursday, March 23, 2017)]
[Notices]
[Pages 14926-14929]
[FR Doc No: 2017-05741]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

[Release No. 34-80270; File No. SR-CBOE-2016-082]

Self-Regulatory Organizations; Chicago Board Options Exchange,
Incorporated; Order Instituting Proceedings To Determine Whether To
Approve or Disapprove a Proposed Rule Change Related to Rules Regarding
the Responsibility for Ensuring Compliance With Priority and Allocation
Requirements and Trade-Through Prohibitions in Open Outcry Trading

March 17, 2017.

I. Introduction

    On December 1, 2016, the Chicago Board Options Exchange,
Incorporated (the ``Exchange'' or ``CBOE'') filed with the Securities
and Exchange Commission (``Commission''), pursuant to Section 19(b)(1)
of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (``Exchange Act'') \1\ and Rule
19b-4 thereunder,\2\ a proposed rule change to amend Exchange rules
regarding responsibility

for ensuring compliance with open outcry priority and allocation
requirements and trade-through prohibitions. The proposed rule change
was published for comment in the Federal Register on December 19,
2016.\3\ The Commission received two comments on the proposed rule
change, plus a response letter from CBOE.\4\ On January 31, 2017,
pursuant to Section 19(b)(2) of the Exchange Act,\5\ the Commission
designated a longer period within which to approve the proposed rule
change, disapprove the proposed rule change, or institute proceedings
to determine whether to disapprove the proposed rule change.\6\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \1\ 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(1).
    \2\ 17 CFR 240.19b-4.
    \3\ See Securities Exchange Act Release No. 79540 (December 13,
2016), 81 FR 91967 (``Notice'').
    \4\ See Letter to Brent J. Fields, Secretary, Commission, from
Joan C. Conley, Senior Vice President and Corporate Secretary,
Nasdaq, dated December 22, 2016 (``Nasdaq Letter'') and Letter to
Brent J. Fields, Secretary, Commission from Steve Crutchfield, Head
of Market Structure, CTC Trading Group, LLC; Kevin Coleman, Chief
Compliance Officer, Belvedere Trading LLC; Scott Kloin, Chief
Compliance Officer, Citadel Securities LLC; Steven Gaston, Chief
Compliance Officer, Consolidated Trading LLC; Rob Armour, Chief
Compliance Officer, DRW Securities, LLC; John Kinahan, Chief
Executive Officer, Group One Trading L.P.; Daniel Overmyer, Chief
Compliance Officer, IMC Financial Markets; Steven Gaston, Chief
Compliance Officer, Lamberson Capital LLC; and Patrick Hickey, Head
of Market Structure, Optiver US LLC, dated February 16, 2017
(``Market Makers Letter''). See also Letter to Brent J. Fields,
Secretary, Commission, from Kyle Edwards, Counsel, CBOE, dated March
14, 2017 (``CBOE Response Letter''). The comment letters and CBOE's
response are available at https://www.sec.gov/comments/sr-cboe-2016-082/cboe2016082.shtml.
    \5\ 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(2).
    \6\ See Securities Exchange Act Release No. 79910, 82 FR 9464
(February 6, 2017). The Commission designated March 19, 2017, as the
date by which the Commission shall either approve or disapprove, or
institute proceedings to determine whether to disapprove, the
proposed rule change.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    The Commission is publishing this notice to solicit comments on the
proposed rule change from interested persons and to institute
proceedings under Section 19(b)(2)(B) of the Exchange Act \7\ to
determine whether to approve or disapprove the proposed rule change, as
discussed in Section III below. The institution of proceedings does not
indicate that the Commission has reached any conclusions with respect
to any of the issues involved, nor does it mean that the Commission
will ultimately disapprove the proposed rule change. Rather, as
described in Section III below, the Commission seeks and encourages
interested persons to provide additional comment on the proposed rule
change in order to inform the Commission's analysis of whether to
approve or disapprove the proposed rule change.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \7\ 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(2)(B).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

II. Summary of Proposal

A. Description of Proposal

    According to the Exchange, currently, if a transaction executed on
the trading floor is executed at a price that violates the priority and
allocation provisions of 6.45A(b) and 6.45B(b) (``Book Priority'') or
the trade-through prohibitions set forth in CBOE Rule 6.81 (``Trade-
Through''), the Exchange enforces the violations against both parties
to the transaction.\8\ Under the proposed rule change, with respect to
an open outcry transaction between a Floor Broker and a Market-Maker,
only the party that initiated the transaction on the trading floor
would be held responsible for Book Priority and Trade-Through
violations.\9\ With respect to an open outcry transaction between a
Floor Broker and another Floor Broker, or a Market-Maker and another
Market-Maker, the Exchange would hold both parties responsible for Book
Priority and Trade-Through violations, consistent with the Exchange's
current practice.\10\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \8\ See Notice, supra note 3, at 91968.
    \9\ See proposed Interpretation and Policy .05 to Rule 6.45A,
Interpretation and Policy .06 to Rule 6.45B, and Interpretation and
Policy .07 to Rule 6.73.
    \10\ See id. See also Notice, supra note 3, at 91969.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    The Exchange observes that generally, Floor Brokers initiate
transactions on the Exchange's trading floor by representing orders and
executing the orders against bids and offers of other in-crowd market
participants, including Market-Makers.\11\ The Exchange asserts that
when Floor Brokers trade with Market-Makers, the Floor Brokers are in a
better position to prevent Trade-Through and Book Priority violations
because, unlike Market-Makers, Floor Brokers have access to the Public
Automatic Routing System (``PAR'') offered by CBOE that provides Floor
Brokers with the necessary market data to avoid Trade-Through and Book
Priority violations, as well as provides alerts that warn Floor Brokers
in advance that a proposed execution price for a given order may
violate Book Priority rules or result in a potential Trade-Through.\12\
The Exchange states that generally, a Floor Broker will verbally
communicate a request for quote for a given order to the trading crowd,
and the Market-Makers will then provide a responsive quote without the
aid of PAR.\13\ The Exchange states that Market-Makers evaluate a Floor
Broker's request for a quote against the Market-Maker's theoretical
values for the given options series, a process which the Exchange
observes becomes increasingly complicated when there are multiple
options series that must be evaluated for a complex order.\14\ The
Exchange asserts that it is therefore reasonable for a Market-Maker to
rely on the Floor Broker initiating a trade to ensure that an open
outcry transaction is executed in accordance with the Book Priority and
Trade-Through provisions.\15\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \11\ See Notice, supra note 3, at 91968.
    \12\ See id. at 91969.
    \13\ See id.
    \14\ See id.
    \15\ See id. In the event a Market-Maker initiates a transaction
with a Floor Broker, the Market-Maker would be responsible for
ensuring that the transaction is executed in accordance with the
Book Priority and Trade-Through provisions. See id.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    The Exchange represents that this rule change, consistent with the
Options Intermarket Linkage Plan,\16\ is reasonably designed to prevent
Trade-Throughs, as well as Book Priority violations, because it would
place the responsibility for ensuring transactions are executed in
accordance with the Exchange's rules on the ``specific party or parties
in a good position to ensure compliance.'' \17\ The Exchange also
believes that the proposed rule change ``may help limit the number of
[Book Priority] and Trade-Through violations because the proposal
identifies a particular party or parties to each transaction (as
opposed to all parties) as responsible for ensuring compliance with the
rules.'' \18\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \16\ See generally Securities Exchange Act Release No. 43086
(July 28, 2000), 65 FR 48023 (August 4, 2000) (Order approving
Options Intermarket Linkage Plan).
    \17\ See Notice, supra note 3, at 91969.
    \18\ See id.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

B. Summary of Comments

    As previously noted, the Commission received two comment letters on
the proposed rule change, and a response from CBOE.\19\ One commenter
states that it neither supports nor opposes the Exchange's
proposal,\20\ and the other commenter expresses support for the
proposed rule change.\21\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \19\ See supra note 4.
    \20\ See Nasdaq Letter, supra note 4.
    \21\ See Nasdaq Letter, supra note 4. See Market Makers Letter,
supra note 4.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    One commenter suggests that the Exchange explain how PAR operates,
and how the Exchange validates trades and conducts surveillances for
purposes of regulating Book Priority and Trade-Through violations.\22\
In addition, the commenter suggests that the Commission articulate a
principle of governing enforcement of book priority and trade-through
requirements to floor trading in standardized options.\23\ Though
beyond the scope of CBOE's

proposal, the commenter believes that disparities between how markets
enforce these requirements could impact intramarket and intermarket
competition.\24\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \22\ See Nasdaq Letter, supra note 4, at 3.
    \23\ See id. at 4.
    \24\ See id. at 3.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    Other commenters (in a joint letter submitted by nine CBOE market
participants) support the proposal and assert that the proposed rule
change seeks to assign responsibility for ensuring compliance with open
outcry priority and allocation requirements and trade-through
prohibitions in a ``fair, reasonable, and logical manner,''
particularly in the case of an open-outcry trade initiated by a Floor
Broker and responded to by a Market-Maker, because Market-Makers
``generally lack access to'' the tools and alerts CBOE offers to Floor
Brokers that help assure compliance with those rules.\25\ The
commenters observe that pursuant to the Exchange's rules, it is a Floor
Broker's responsibility to use due diligence to execute an order at the
best price available, and to ascertain whether a better price than the
one displayed is being quoted by another party, and that therefore, a
Market-Maker should be able to assume that the Floor Broker has cleared
the customer limit order book of any order at a better price in
accordance with applicable rules.\26\ The commenters assert that ``the
Floor Broker--as the party controlling the precise timing of any
execution he or she initiates--is definitively in the best position to
ascertain whether a Trade-Through or other rule violation would occur
up to the instant of trade consummation, and should therefore
appropriately hold sole responsibility for compliance with the
applicable rules.'' \27\ The commenters believe that by clearly
allocating this responsibility, the proposal would remove impediments
to and better align with the mechanism of a free and open market.\28\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \25\ See Market Makers Letter, supra note 4, at 1-2. In
addition, the commenter asserted that the issues raised by the
Nasdaq letter ``have no bearing on'' the Exchange's proposal. See
id.
    \26\ See id. at 2.
    \27\ See id.
    \28\ See id.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    In its response letter, the Exchange asserts that the Nasdaq Letter
does not address the substance of the proposal but rather offers
general comment regarding open outcry trading.\29\ In addition, in
response to the Nasdaq Letter, the Exchange notes that its proposal
does not describe how PAR operates or its surveillance parameters
because this information is described in its rules.\30\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \29\ See CBOE Response Letter, supra note 4, at 1.
    \30\ See id. at 3.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

III. Proceedings To Determine Whether To Approve or Disapprove SR-CBOE-
2016-082 and Grounds for Disapproval Under Consideration

    The Commission is instituting proceedings pursuant to Section
19(b)(2)(B) of the Exchange Act \31\ to determine whether the proposed
rule change should be approved or disapproved. Institution of such
proceedings is appropriate at this time in view of the legal and policy
issues raised by the proposed rule change. Institution of proceedings
does not indicate that the Commission has reached any conclusions with
respect to any of the issues involved. Rather, as stated below, the
Commission seeks and encourages interested persons to provide comments
on the proposed rule change to inform the Commission's analysis of
whether to approve or disapprove the proposed rule change.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \31\ 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(2)(B).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    Pursuant to Section 19(b)(2)(B) of the Exchange Act,\32\ the
Commission is providing notice of the grounds for disapproval under
consideration, as discussed below. The Commission believes that
instituting proceedings will allow for additional analysis of, and
input from commenters with respect to, the proposed rule change's
consistency with Section 6(b)(1) of the Exchange Act, which requires
that a national securities exchange is so organized and has the
capacity to be able to carry out the purposes of the Exchange Act and
to comply, and to enforce compliance by its members and persons
associated with its members, with the provisions of the Exchange Act,
the rules and regulations thereunder, and the rules of the
exchange.\33\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \32\ Id.
    \33\ 15 U.S.C. 78f(b)(1).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    The Commission also is instituting proceedings to allow for
additional analysis and input concerning the proposed rule change's
consistency with Section 6(b)(5) of the Exchange Act,\34\ which
requires that the rules of a national securities exchange be designed,
among other things, to promote just and equitable principles of trade
and, in general, to protect investors and the public interest and not
be designed to permit unfair discrimination between customers, issuers,
brokers, or dealers.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \34\ 15 U.S.C. 78f(b)(5).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    Specifically, the Commission is concerned whether the proposed rule
change could adversely impact the ability of the Exchange, consistent
with Section 6(b)(1) of the Exchange Act, to comply, and to enforce
compliance by its members on the CBOE trading floor, with applicable
rules and regulations, including the Book Priority and Trade-Through
provisions. In particular, the Commission wishes to consider further
whether CBOE has sufficiently demonstrated how absolving from liability
for Book Priority and Trade-Through rule violations one party to a
trade (i.e., the responder, for trades involving a Floor Broker on one
side and a Market Maker on the other) while placing sole liability on
the other party (i.e., the initiator, for trades involving a Floor
Broker on one side and a Market Maker on the other) will foster
compliance with those rules by its members and not diminish the
Exchange's ability to ensure compliance with these critically important
rules.
    Further, the Exchange's stated justification for its proposal,
which relies on the control an initiator has over the execution and
price of the order as well as the fact that CBOE supplies its Floor
Brokers with a system (PAR) that helps automate the necessary pre-trade
checks, appears inconsistent with continuing to hold both parties to a
trade liable when the trade is between two Market Makers or two Floor
Brokers. Similarly, the proposal raises questions under Section 6(b)(5)
of the Exchange Act, in that not enforcing Trade-Through and Book
Priority violations against a party based on the identity of its
counter-party (i.e., not enforcing against the responder when a Market-
Maker trades with a Floor Broker, but enforcing against both parties
when a Market-Maker trades with a Market-Maker or a Floor Broker trades
with a Floor Broker) may be unfairly discriminatory.

IV. Procedure: Request for Written Comments

    The Commission requests that interested persons provide written
submissions of their views, data, and arguments with respect to the
issues identified above, as well as any other concerns they may have
with the proposal. In particular, the Commission invites the written
views of interested persons concerning whether the proposal is
consistent with Sections 6(b)(1), 6(b)(5), or any other provision of
the Exchange Act, or the rules and regulations thereunder. Although
there do not appear to be any issues relevant to approval or
disapproval that would be facilitated by an oral presentation of views,
data, and arguments, the Commission will consider, pursuant to Rule
19b-4, any request for an

opportunity to make an oral presentation.\35\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \35\ Section 19(b)(2) of the Exchange Act, as amended by the
Securities Act Amendments of 1975, Public Law 94-29 (June 4, 1975),
grants the Commission flexibility to determine what type of
proceeding--either oral or notice and opportunity for written
comments--is appropriate for consideration of a particular proposal
by a self-regulatory organization. See Securities Act Amendments of
1975, Senate Comm. on Banking, Housing & Urban Affairs, S. Rep. No.
75, 94th Cong., 1st Sess. 30 (1975).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    Interested persons are invited to submit written data, views, and
arguments regarding whether the proposal should be approved or
disapproved by April 13, 2017. Any person who wishes to file a rebuttal
to any other person's submission must file that rebuttal by April 27,
2017. The Commission asks that commenters address the sufficiency of
the Exchange's statements in support of the proposal, in addition to
any other comments they may wish to submit about the proposed rule
change.
    Comments may be submitted by any of the following methods:

Electronic Comments

     Use the Commission's Internet comment form (http://www.sec.gov/rules/sro.shtml); or
     Send an email to<EMAIL_ADDRESS>Please include
File Number SR-CBOE-2016-082 on the subject line.

Paper Comments

     Send paper comments in triplicate to Secretary, Securities
and Exchange Commission, 100 F Street NE., Washington, DC 20549-1090.

All submissions should refer to File Numbers SR-CBOE-2016-082. This
file number should be included on the subject line if email is used. To
help the Commission process and review your comments more efficiently,
please use only one method. The Commission will post all comments on
the Commission's Internet Web site (http://www.sec.gov/rules/sro.shtml). Copies of the submission, all subsequent amendments, all
written statements with respect to the proposed rule change that are
filed with the Commission, and all written communications relating to
the proposed rule change between the Commission and any person, other
than those that may be withheld from the public in accordance with the
provisions of 5 U.S.C. 552, will be available for Web site viewing and
printing in the Commission's Public Reference Room, 100 F Street NE.,
Washington, DC 20549, on official business days between the hours of
10:00 a.m. and 3:00 p.m. Copies of these filings also will be available
for inspection and copying at the principal office of the Exchange. All
comments received will be posted without change; the Commission does
not edit personal identifying information from submissions. You should
submit only information that you wish to make available publicly. All
submissions should refer to File Number SR-CBOE-2016-082 and should be
submitted on or before April 13, 2017. Rebuttal comments should be
submitted by April 27, 2017.

    For the Commission, by the Division of Trading and Markets,
pursuant to delegated authority.\36\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \36\ 17 CFR 200.30-3(a)(57).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

Eduardo A. Aleman,
Assistant Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2017-05741 Filed 3-22-17; 8:45 am]
 BILLING CODE 8011-01-P


[Federal Register Volume 77, Number 122 (Monday, June 25, 2012)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Pages 37777-37779]
[FR Doc No: 2012-15325]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION

Federal Aviation Administration

14 CFR Part 39

[Docket No. FAA-2012-0659; Directorate Identifier 2011-SW-061-AD;
Amendment 39-17101; AD 2012-12-21]
RIN 2120-AA64

Airworthiness Directives; Eurocopter Deutschland GmbH Helicopters

AGENCY: Federal Aviation Administration (FAA), DOT.

ACTION: Final rule; request for comments.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: We are superseding an existing airworthiness directive (AD)
for all Eurocopter Deutschland GmbH (ECD) Model MBB-BK 117 C-2
helicopters. That AD currently requires revising the ``Emergency and
Malfunction Procedures'' and ``Performance Data'' sections of the
Rotorcraft Flight Manual (RFM) by inserting three temporary pages into
the RFM to alert pilots to monitor the power display when a generator
is deactivated and provides procedures to prevent failure of the
remaining generator. Before we issued that AD, the manufacturer
developed a procedure to modify the two ``After Junction Boxes'' by
removing a diode from each box, which provides terminating action for
our AD requirements. These actions are intended to require implementing
this terminating action to prevent an electrical power system failure
and subsequent loss of control of the helicopter and revising the RFM
accordingly, by removing the temporary pages inserted to comply with
the superseded AD.

DATES: This AD becomes effective July 10, 2012.
    The Director of the Federal Register approved the incorporation by
reference of certain documents listed in this AD as of July 10, 2012.
    We must receive comments on this AD by August 24, 2012.

ADDRESSES: You may send comments by any of the following methods:
     Federal eRulemaking Docket: Go to http://www.regulations.gov. Follow the online instructions for sending your
comments electronically.
     Fax:<PHONE_NUMBER>.
     Mail: Send comments to the U.S. Department of
Transportation, Docket Operations, M-30, West Building Ground Floor,
Room W12-140, 1200 New Jersey Avenue SE., Washington, DC 20590-0001.
     Hand Delivery: Deliver to the ``Mail'' address between 9
a.m. and 5 p.m., Monday through Friday, except Federal holidays.
    Examining the AD Docket: You may examine the AD docket on the
Internet at http://www.regulations.gov or in person at the Docket
Operations Office between 9 a.m. and 5 p.m., Monday through Friday,
except Federal holidays. The AD docket contains this AD, the economic
evaluation, any comments received and other information. The street
address for the Docket Operations Office (telephone<PHONE_NUMBER>) is in
the ADDRESSES section. Comments will be available in the AD docket
shortly after receipt.
    For service information identified in this AD, contact American
Eurocopter Corporation, 2701 N. Forum Drive, Grand Prairie, TX 75052,
telephone<PHONE_NUMBER> or<PHONE_NUMBER>, fax<PHONE_NUMBER>, or at
http://www.eurocopter.com/techpub. You may review a copy of the service
information at the FAA, Office of the Regional Counsel, Southwest
Region, 2601 Meacham Blvd., Room 663, Fort Worth, Texas 76137.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: George Schwab, Aviation Safety
Engineer, FAA, Rotorcraft Directorate, Safety Management Group, 2601
Meacham Blvd., Fort Worth, TX 76137, telephone<PHONE_NUMBER>, email:
<EMAIL_ADDRESS>
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

Comments Invited

    This AD is a final rule that involves requirements affecting flight
safety, and we did not provide you with notice and an opportunity to
provide your comments prior to it becoming effective. However, we
invite you to participate in this rulemaking by submitting written
comments, data, or views. We also invite comments relating to the
economic, environmental, energy, or federalism impacts that resulted
from adopting this AD. The most helpful comments reference a specific
portion of the AD, explain the reason for any recommended change, and
include supporting data. To ensure the docket does not contain
duplicate comments, commenters should send only one copy of written
comments, or if comments are filed electronically, commenters should
submit them only one time. We will file

in the docket all comments that we receive, as well as a report
summarizing each substantive public contact with FAA personnel
concerning this rulemaking during the comment period. We will consider
all the comments we receive and may conduct additional rulemaking based
on those comments.

Discussion

    On September 29, 2011, we issued AD 2011-21-13 (76 FR 68299,
November 4, 2011), for all ECD model MBB-BK 117 C-2 helicopters. Our AD
2011-21-13 was based on European Aviation Safety Agency (EASA)
Emergency AD No. 2010-0268-E, dated December 21, 2010 (EAD 2010-0268-
E), requiring the introduction of additional RFM procedures to monitor
the electrical power display generator amperes (GEN AMPS) on the
Vehicle and Engine Multifunction Display (VEMD) during switching of the
generator. EASA advised that some ECD MBB-BK117 C-2 helicopters
detected an excessive current flow when one generator was deactivated.
This situation, if not detected and corrected, could lead to failure of
the generator, likely resulting in loss of electrical power and
inducing loss of systems that are necessary for safe flight. To address
this unsafe condition, AD 2011-21-13 requires revising the ``Emergency
and Malfunction Procedures'' and the ``Performance Data'' sections of
the RFM by inserting three temporary pages from ECD Alert Service
Bulletin (ASB) No. ASB MBB BK117 C-2-24A-008, dated December 20, 2010
(MBB BK117 C-2-24A-008). Those pages require operators to insert pages
into the RFM, which provide that pilots visually monitor the power
display GEN AMPS on the VEMD for too high of a current when a generator
is shut down, such as during the ENGINE POWER CHECK. These revised RFM
provisions provide for switching off the two main electrical buses on
the overhead panel to prevent the operating generator from being
damaged when the other generator is shut down. We issued AD 2011-21-13
to prevent failure of a generator, which could result in loss of
electrical power, loss of systems necessary for flight safety, and
subsequent loss of control of the helicopter.

Actions Since Existing AD Was Issued

    Before we issued AD 2011-21-13 (76 FR 68299, November 4, 2011),
EASA, which is the Technical Agent for the Member States of the
European Union, issued EASA AD No. 2011-0162, dated August 30, 2011 (AD
2011-0162). In AD 2011-0162, EASA states that ECD has developed a
modification to prevent the possibility of too high current flow when a
generator is deactivated, and updated the RFM procedures accordingly.
This EASA AD requires the RFM changes introduced by EAD 2010-0268-E to
be removed. The EASA AD also requires modification of the Generator
Relay left-hand and right-hand After Junction Boxes by removing diodes,
CR10007 and CR10008, respectively, on ECD MBB-BK117 C-2 helicopters,
serial numbers 9004 through 9500. Through this AD action, the FAA is
requiring this same modification to the After Junction Boxes in
helicopters registered in the United States and removal of the same
pages from the RFM that were introduced by AD 2011-21-13.

FAA's Determination

    These helicopters have been approved by the aviation authority of
the Federal Republic of Germany (FRG) and are approved for operation in
the United States. Pursuant to our bilateral agreement with the FRG,
EASA, their technical representative, has notified us of the unsafe
condition described in the EASA AD. We are issuing this AD because we
evaluated all information provided by EASA and determined the unsafe
condition is likely to exist or develop on other helicopters of the
same type design.

Related Service Information

    We reviewed ECD ASB MBB BK117 C-2-24A-008, Revision 1, dated August
29, 2011. The ASB describes procedures for removing two diodes on the
generator relays in the After Junction Boxes. EASA classified this ASB
as mandatory and issued AD 2011-0162 to ensure the continued
airworthiness of these helicopters.

AD Requirements

    This AD requires, within 30 days, removing temporary pages from the
RFM that were inserted for AD 2011-21-13. This AD also requires
modifying Generator Relay left-hand and right-hand After Junction Boxes
by removing diodes, CR10007 and CR10008.

Differences Between This AD and the EASA AD

    The EASA AD requires compliance by September 6, 2011; the FAA
requires compliance within 30 days from the effective date of the AD.

Costs of Compliance

    We estimate that this AD affects 232 helicopters of U.S. Registry.
We estimate that operators may incur the following costs in order to
comply with this AD. Removing the diodes from the after junction boxes
will require 2 work hours at an average labor cost of $85 per hour and
incorporating the changes into the RFM will require .5 work hour for a
total cost per operator of $213 and a cost to the entire U.S. fleet of
$49,416.

FAA's Justification and Determination of the Effective Date

    Providing an opportunity for public comments prior to adopting
these AD requirements would delay implementing the safety actions
needed to correct this known unsafe condition. Therefore, we find that
the risk to the flying public justifies waiving notice and comment
prior to the adoption of this rule because the required corrective
actions must be accomplished within 30 days.
    Since an unsafe condition exists that requires the immediate
adoption of this AD, we determined that notice and opportunity for
public comment before issuing this AD are impracticable and contrary to
the public interest and that good cause exists for making this
amendment effective in less than 30 days.

Authority for This Rulemaking

    Title 49 of the United States Code specifies the FAA's authority to
issue rules on aviation safety. Subtitle I, section 106, describes the
authority of the FAA Administrator. ``Subtitle VII: Aviation
Programs,'' describes in more detail the scope of the Agency's
authority.
    We are issuing this rulemaking under the authority described in
``Subtitle VII, Part A, Subpart III, Section 44701: General
requirements.'' Under that section, Congress charges the FAA with
promoting safe flight of civil aircraft in air commerce by prescribing
regulations for practices, methods, and procedures the Administrator
finds necessary for safety in air commerce. This regulation is within
the scope of that authority because it addresses an unsafe condition
that is likely to exist or develop on products identified in this
rulemaking action.

Regulatory Findings

    We determined that this AD will not have federalism implications
under Executive Order 13132. This AD will not have a substantial direct
effect on the States, on the relationship between the national
Government and the States, or on the distribution of power and
responsibilities among the various levels of government.
    For the reasons discussed, I certify that this AD:
    1. Is not a ``significant regulatory action'' under Executive Order
12866;

    2. Is not a ``significant rule'' under the DOT Regulatory Policies
and Procedures (44 FR 11034, February 26, 1979);
    3. Will not affect intrastate aviation in Alaska to the extent that
it justifies making a regulatory distinction; and
    4. Will not have a significant economic impact, positive or
negative, on a substantial number of small entities under the criteria
of the Regulatory Flexibility Act.
    We prepared an economic evaluation of the estimated costs to comply
with this AD and placed it in the AD docket.

List of Subjects in 14 CFR Part 39

    Air transportation, Aircraft, Aviation safety, Incorporation by
reference, Safety.

Adoption of the Amendment

    Accordingly, under the authority delegated to me by the
Administrator, the FAA proposes to amend 14 CFR part 39 as follows:

PART 39--AIRWORTHINESS DIRECTIVES

0
1. The authority citation for part 39 continues to read as follows:

    Authority:  49 U.S.C. 106(g), 40113, 44701.

Sec.  39.13  [Amended]

0
2. The FAA amends Sec.  39.13 by removing Amendment 39-16836 (76 FR
68299, November 4, 2011), and adding the following new airworthiness
directive (AD):

2012-12-21 Eurocopter Deutschland GMBH: Amendment 39-17101; Docket
No. FAA-2012-0659; Directorate Identifier 2011-SW-061-AD.

(a) Applicability

    This AD applies to Model MBB-BK 117 C-2 helicopters,
certificated in any category.

(b) Unsafe Condition

    This AD defines the unsafe condition as excessively high reverse
current flow when switching off a generator during flight, which
could make the remaining generator fail and result in a complete
electrical power system failure and subsequent loss of control of
the helicopter.

(c) Other Affected ADs

    This AD supersedes AD 2011-21-13, Amendment 39-16836 (76 FR
68299, November 4, 2011).

(d) Compliance

    You are responsible for performing each action required by this
AD within the specified compliance time unless it has already been
accomplished prior to that time.

(e) Required Action

    Within 30 days:
    (1) Remove the specified temporary pages from the following
sections of the rotorcraft flight manual (RFM) RFM BK 117 C-2:
    (i) ``Emergency and Malfunction Procedures'': pages 3-3 and 3-4,
and
    (ii) ``Performance Data'': page 5-7.
    (2) Remove diodes CR10007 and CR10008 from the generator relays
in the left-hand and right-hand After Junction Boxes, respectively,
in accordance with the Accomplishment Instructions, paragraphs
3.B.2.(a) through 3.B.2.(d), and as depicted in Figures 1 and 2, of
Eurocopter Alert Service Bulletin ASB MBB BK117 C-2-24A-008 Revision
1, dated August 29, 2011.
    (3) Test the DC Power system for proper operation.
    (4) Do not install an After Junction Box on any helicopter,
unless the After Junction Box has been modified in accordance with
the requirements of this AD.

(f) Alternative Methods of Compliance (AMOCs)

    (1) The Manager, Safety Management Group, FAA, may approve AMOCs
for this AD. Send your proposal to: George Schwab, Aviation Safety
Engineer, FAA, Rotorcraft Directorate, Safety Management Group, 2601
Meacham Blvd., Fort Worth, TX 76137, telephone<PHONE_NUMBER>,
email<EMAIL_ADDRESS>    (2) For operations conducted under a 14 CFR part 119 operating
certificate or under 14 CFR part 91, subpart K, we suggest that you
notify your principal inspector, or lacking a principal inspector,
the manager of the local flight standards district office or
certificate holding district office before operating any aircraft
complying with this AD through an AMOC.

(g) Additional Information

    The subject of this AD is addressed in the European Aviation
Safety Agency AD No. 2011-0162, dated August 30, 2011.

(h) Subject

    Joint Aircraft Service Component (JASC) Code: 2435: Starter
Generator.

(i) Material Incorporated by Reference

    (1) The Director of the Federal Register approved the
incorporation by reference (IBR) of the service information listed
in this paragraph under 5 U.S.C. 552(a) and 1 CFR part 51.
    (2) You must use this service information as applicable to do
the actions required by this AD, unless the AD specifies otherwise.
    (i) Eurocopter Alert Service Bulletin ASB MBB BK117 C-2-24A-008
Revision 1, dated August 29, 2011.
    (ii) Reserved.
    (3) For Eurocopter service information identified in this AD,
contact American Eurocopter Corporation, 2701 N. Forum Drive, Grand
Prairie, TX 75052, telephone<PHONE_NUMBER> or<PHONE_NUMBER>, fax
(972) 641-3775, or at http://www.eurocopter.com/techpub.
    (4) You may view this service information at the FAA, Office of
the Regional Counsel, Southwest Region, 2601 Meacham Blvd., Room
663, Fort Worth, Texas 76137.
    (5) You may also view this service information at the National
Archives and Records Administration (NARA). For information on the
availability of this material at NARA, call<PHONE_NUMBER>, or go
to: http://www.archives.gov/federal_register/code_of_federal_regulations/ibr_locations.html.

    Issued in Fort Worth, Texas, on June 14, 2012.
Lance T. Gant,
Acting Manager, Rotorcraft Directorate, Aircraft Certification Service.
[FR Doc. 2012-15325 Filed 6-22-12; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910-13-P


[Federal Register Volume 77, Number 176 (Tuesday, September 11, 2012)]
[Notices]
[Pages 55845-55846]
[FR Doc No: 2012-22210]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES

Food and Drug Administration

[Docket No. FDA-2012-N-0001]

Science Board to the Food and Drug Administration: Request for
Nominations

AGENCY: Food and Drug Administration, HHS.

ACTION: Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Food and Drug Administration (FDA) is requesting
nominations to serve on the Science Board to FDA (Science Board).
    FDA seeks to include the views of women and men, members of all
racial and ethnic groups, and individuals with and without disabilities
on its advisory committees and, therefore, encourages nominations of
appropriately qualified candidates from these groups.

DATES: Nominations received on or before October 11, 2012 will be given
first consideration for membership on the Science Board. Nominations
received after October 11, 2012 will be considered for nomination to
the Board should nominees still be needed.

ADDRESSES: All nominations for membership should be sent electronically
to<EMAIL_ADDRESS>or by mail to Advisory Committee Oversight and
Management Staff, 10903 New Hampshire Ave., Bldg. 32, rm. 5103, Silver
Spring, MD 20993-0002.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Regarding all nomination questions for
membership, the primary contact is Martha Monser, Office of the Chief
Scientist, Food and Drug Administration, 10903 New Hampshire Ave.,
Bldg. 32, rm. 4286, Silver Spring, MD 20993-0002,<PHONE_NUMBER>, email:
<EMAIL_ADDRESS>

    Information about becoming a member on an FDA advisory committee
can also be obtained by visiting FDA's Web site by using the following
link http://www.fda.gov/AdvisoryCommittees/AboutAdvisoryCommittees/CommitteeMembership/default.htm.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: FDA is requesting nominations to the Science
Board. The Science Board will meet approximately three times a year.
Meetings of the Science Board will be open to the public. All meetings
will be announced in the Federal Register at least 15 days prior to
each public meeting.

I. General Function of the Committee

    The Science Board shall provide advice primarily to the
Commissioner and other appropriate officials on specific complex
scientific and technical issues important to FDA and its mission,
including emerging issues within the scientific community.
Additionally, the Science Board will provide advice that supports the
Agency in keeping pace with technical and scientific developments,
including in regulatory science and input into the Agency's research
agenda and on upgrading its scientific and research facilities and
training opportunities. It will also provide, where requested, expert
review of Agency sponsored intramural and extramural scientific
research programs.

II. Desired Expertise

    FDA is specifically considering persons knowledgeable in the fields
of food science, safety, and nutrition; chemistry; pharmacology;
translational and clinical medicine and research; toxicology;
biostatistics; medical devices; imaging; robotics; cell and tissue
based products; regenerative medicine; public health and epidemiology;
international health and regulation; product safety; product
manufacturing sciences and quality; and other scientific areas relevant
to FDA-regulated products such as systems biology, informatics,
nanotechnology, and combination products. Members shall be chosen from
academia and industry. The Science Board may also include technically
qualified federal members.

III. Nomination Procedures

    Any interested person may nominate one or more qualified person(s)
for membership on the Science Board. Self nominations are also
accepted. Nominations shall include the name of the committee, complete
curriculum vitae of each nominee, and their current business address
and/or home address, telephone number, and email address, if available.
Nominations must also acknowledge that the nominee is aware of the
nomination unless self-nominated. FDA will ask the potential candidates
to provide detailed information concerning such matters related to
financial holdings, employment, and research grants and/or contracts to
permit evaluation of possible sources of conflict of interest.
    This notice is issued under the Federal Advisory Act (5 U.S.C. app.
2) and 21 CFR part 14 relating to advisory committees.

    Dated: Sept. 5, 2012.
Jill Hartzler Warner,
Acting Associate Commissioner for Special Medical Programs.
[FR Doc. 2012-22210 Filed 9-10-12; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4160-01-P


[Federal Register Volume 86, Number 34 (Tuesday, February 23, 2021)]
[Notices]
[Pages 10997-10998]
[FR Doc No: 2021-03654]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF LABOR

Occupational Safety and Health Administration

Agency Information Collection Activities: Announcement of the
Office of Management and Budget (OMB) Control Numbers Under the
Paperwork Reduction Act

AGENCY: Occupational Safety and Health Administration (OSHA), Labor.

ACTION: Notice; announcement of the Office of Management and Budget's
(OMB) approval of information collection requirements.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Occupational Safety and Health Administration (OSHA)
announces that OMB extended approval for information collection
requirements found in OSHA's standards and its regulations on the
Student Data Form and Conflict of Interest and Disclosure Form outlined
in this notice. OSHA sought approval of these requirements under the
Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 (PRA), and, as required by that Act, is
announcing the approval numbers and expiration dates for these
requirements and regulations.

DATES: Applicable February 23, 2021.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Seleda Perryman or Theda Kenney,
Directorate of Standards and Guidance, OSHA, U.S. Department of Labor,
telephone<PHONE_NUMBER>.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: In a series of Federal Register notices, the
agency provided 60-day comment periods for the public to respond to
OSHA's burden hour and cost estimates. The various information
collection (paperwork) requirements in the safety and health standards
pertain to general industry, construction, shipyards and maritime
(i.e., 29 CFR parts 1910, 1915, and 1926), and its regulations on the
OSHA Student Data Form and OSHA's Conflict of Interest and Disclosure
Form.
    In accordance with the PRA (44 U.S.C. 3501-3520), OMB approved
these information collection requirements. The table provides the
following information for each of these requirements approved by OMB:
The title of the Federal Register notice; the Federal Register citation
(date, volume, and leading page); OSHA docket number; OMB's Control
Number; and the new expiration date.
    In accordance with 5 CFR 1320.5(b), an agency cannot conduct,
sponsor, or require a response to a collection of information unless
the collection displays a valid OMB control number and the agency
informs respondents that they need not respond to the collection of
information.

----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
                                                   Date of Federal Register
Title of the information collection request     publication,  Federal Register      OMB control     Expiration
                                                citation, and OSHA Docket No.           No.            date
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
1,3-Butadiene Standard (29 CFR 1910.1051)..  December 27, 2019, 84 FR 71477,           1218-0170      07/31/2023
                                              Docket No. OSHA-2012-0027.
4,4'-Methylenedianiline for General          November 12, 2019, 84 FR 61077,           1218-0184      07/31/3023
 Industry (29 CFR 1910.1050).                 Docket No. OSHA-2012-0040.
Access to Employee Exposure and Medical      February 2, 2020, 85 FR 6580,             1218-0065      10/31/2023
 Records (29 CFR 1910.1020).                  Docket No. OSHA-2009-0043.
Aerial Lifts Standard (29 CFR 1926.453)....  February 26, 2020, 85 FR 11110,           1218-0216      10/31/2023
                                              Docket No. OSHA-2009-0045.
Asbestos in General Industry Standard (29    February 6, 2020, 85 FR 6979,             1218-0133      07/31/2023
 CFR 1910.1001).                              Docket No. OSHA-2010-0018.
Asbestos in Shipyards Standard (29 CFR       November 29, 2019, 84 FR 65849,           1218-0195      07/31/2023
 1915.1001).                                  Docket No. OSHA-2012-0009.
Benzene (29 CFR 1910.1028).................  November 29, 2019, 84 FR 65848,           1218-0129      07/31/2023
                                              Docket No. OSHA-2013-0008.
Cadmium in Construction Standard (29 CFR     November 29, 2019, 84 FR 65844,           1218-0186      06/30/2023
 1926.1127).                                  Docket No. OSHA-2012-0004.
Construction Fall Protection Systems         February 26, 2020, 85 FR 11118,           1218-0197      10/31/2023
 Criteria, Practices, and Training            Docket No. OSHA-2010-0008.
 Requirements.

Crawler, Locomotive, and Truck Cranes        February 26, 2020, 85 FR 11112,           1218-0221      10/31/2023
 Standard (29 CFR 1910.180).                  Docket No. OSHA-2010-0015.
Derricks Standard (29 CFR 1910.181)........  October 1, 2019, 84 FR 52143,             1218-0222      07/31/2023
                                              Docket No. OSHA-2010-0016.
Ethylene Oxide Standard (29 CFR 1910.1047).  May 27, 2020, 85 FR 31812, Docket         1218-0108      12/31/2023
                                              No. OSHA-2009-0035.
Formaldehyde Standard (29 CFR 1910.1048)...  February 26, 2020, 85 FR 11107,           1218-0145      10/31/2023
                                              Docket No. OSHA-2009-0041.
Hazardous Waste Operations and Emergency     November 8, 2019, 84 FR 60455,            1218-0202      12/31/2023
 Response (HAZWOPER) Standard (29 CFR         Docket No. OSHA-2011-0862.
 1910.120).
Hexavalent Chromium Standards for General    October 25, 2019, 84 FR 57488,            1218-0252      06/30/2023
 Industry (29 CFR 1910.1026), Shipyard        Docket No. OSHA-2012-0034.
 Employment (29 CFR 1915.1026), and
 Construction (29 CFR 1926.1126).
Lead in General Industry Standard (29 CFR    August 27, 2019, 84 FR 44931,             1218-0092      04/30/2023
 1910.1025).                                  Docket No. OSHA-2012-0013.
Logging Operations Standard (29 CFR          April 24, 2020, 85 FR 23068, Docket       1218-0198      12/31/2023
 1910.266).                                   No. OSHA-2010-0041.
Manlifts Standard (29 CFR 1910.68(e))......  June 2, 2020, 85 FR 33734, Docket         1218-0226      12/31/2023
                                              No. OSHA-2010-0051.
Occupational Safety and Health               December 23, 2019, 84 FR 70572,           1218-0255      10/31/2023
 Administration Conflict of Interest and      Docket No. OSHA-2009-0042.
 Disclosure Form.
Presence Sensing Device Initiation (PSDI)    April 9, 2020, 85 FR 19961, Docket        1218-0143      10/31/2023
 Standard (29 CFR 1910.217(h)).               No. OSHA-2010-0009.
Respirable Crystalline Silica Standards for  October 1, 2019, 84 FR 52144,             1218-0266      06/30/2023
 General Industry, Maritime (29 CFR           Docket No. OSHA-2019-0002.
 1910.1053) and Construction (29 CFR
 1926.1053).
Rigging Equipment for Material Handling (29  June 24, 2020, 85 FR 37960, Docker        1218-0233      12/31/2023
 CFR 1926.251).                               No. OSHA-2010-0038.
Special Dipping and Coating Operations (Dip  November 8, 2019, 84 FR 60454,            1218-0237      06/30/2023
 Tanks) (29 CFR 1910.126(g)(4)).              Docket No. OSHA-2010-0020.
Standard on 4,4'-Methylenedianiline for      November 12, 2019, 84 FR 61077,           1218-0184      07/31/2023
 General Industry (29 CFR 1910.1050).         Docket No. OSHA-2012-0040.
Student Data Form..........................  December 27, 2019, 84 FR 71478,           1218-0172      07/31/2023
                                              Docket No. OSHA-2010-0022.
Walking-Working Surfaces Standard (29 CFR    July 25, 2019, 84 FR 35888, Docket        1218-0199      07/31/2023
 part 1910, subpart D).                       No. OSHA-2013-0002.
Welding, Cutting, and Brazing Standard (29   November 21, 2019, 84 FR 64348,           1218-0207      07/31/2023
 CFR part 1910, subpart Q).                   Docket No. OSHA-2010-0037.
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Authority and Signature

    Amanda L. Edens, Deputy Assistant Secretary of Labor for
Occupational Safety and Health, directed the preparation of this
notice. The authority for this notice is the Paperwork Reduction Act of
1995 (44 U.S.C. 3506 et seq.) and Secretary of Labor's Order No. 1-2012
(77 FR 3912).

    Signed at Washington, DC, on February 11, 2021.
Amanda L. Edens,
Deputy Assistant Secretary of Labor for Occupational Safety and Health.
[FR Doc. 2021-03654 Filed 2-22-21; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4510-26-P