[Federal Register Volume 84, Number 160 (Monday, August 19, 2019)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Pages 42812-42814]
[FR Doc No: 2019-17705]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY

Coast Guard

33 CFR Part 165

[Docket Number USCG-2019-0694]
RIN 1625-AA00

Safety Zone; Kanawha River, Charleston, WV

AGENCY: Coast Guard, DHS.

ACTION: Temporary final rule.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Coast Guard is establishing a temporary safety zone for
all navigable waters on the Kanawha River. The safety zone is needed to
provide for safety of life and protection of vessels and the marine
environment from potential hazards associated with the fireworks
display. Entry of vessels or persons into the zone is prohibited unless
specifically authorized by the Captain of the Port Sector Ohio Valley
or a designated representative.

DATES: This rule is effective from 9:00 through 10 p.m. on August 30,
2019.

ADDRESSES: To view documents mentioned in this preamble as being
available in the docket, go to https://www.regulations.gov, type USCG-
2019-0694 in the ``SEARCH'' box and click ``SEARCH.'' Click on Open
Docket Folder on the line associated with this rule.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: If you have questions on this rule,
call or email MST3 Wesley Cornelius, MSU Huntington, U.S. Coast Guard;
304-733-0198<EMAIL_ADDRESS>
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

I. Table of Abbreviations

CFR Code of Federal Regulations
DHS Department of Homeland Security
FR Federal Register
NPRM Notice of proposed rulemaking
Sec.  Section
U.S.C. United States Code

II. Background Information and Regulatory History

    The Coast Guard is issuing this temporary rule without prior notice
and opportunity to comment pursuant to authority under section 4(a) of
the Administrative Procedure Act (APA) (5 U.S.C. 553(b)). This
provision authorizes an agency to issue a rule without prior notice and
opportunity to comment when the agency for good cause finds that those
procedures are ``impracticable, unnecessary, or contrary to the public
interest.'' Under 5 U.S.C. 553(b)(B), the Coast Guard finds that good
cause exists for not publishing a notice of proposed rulemaking (NPRM)
with respect to this rule because it is impracticable. It is
impracticable to publish an NPRM because we must establish the safety
zone by August 30, 2019 and lack sufficient time to request comments
and respond to those comments before the zone must be established.
    Under 5 U.S.C. 553(d)(3), the Coast Guard finds that good cause
exists for making this rule effective less than 30 days after
publication in the Federal Register. Delaying the effective date of
this rule would be contrary to the public interest because immediate
action is needed to provide for public safety and mitigation of
potential hazards associated with the fireworks display.

III. Legal Authority and Need for Rule

    The Coast Guard is issuing this rule under authority in 46 U.S.C.
70034 (previously 33 U.S.C. 1231). The Captain of the Port Sector Ohio
Valley (COTP) has determined that potential hazards associated with the
fireworks display on August 30, 2019 will be a safety concern for
anyone from mile marker 58.1 to 59.1 on the Kanawha River. This rule is
needed to protect personnel, vessels, and the marine environment in the
navigable waters within the safety zone before during and after the
fireworks display.

IV. Discussion of the Rule

    This rule establishes a safety zone from 9:00 until 10 p.m. on
August 30, 2019. The safety zone will cover all navigable waters on the
Kanawha River from Mile Marker (MM) 58.1 to 59.1. The duration of the
zone is intended to protect persons, vessels, and the marine
environment in these navigable waters before, during, and after the
fireworks display. No vessel or person will be permitted to enter the
safety zone without obtaining permission from the COTP or a designated
representative. Persons or vessels desiring to enter into or pass
through the zone must request permission from the COTP or a designated
representative. They may be contacted on VHF-FM radio channel 16 or
phone at 1-800-253-7465.
    Persons and vessels permitted to enter the safety zone must transit
at the slowest safe speed and comply with all lawful directions issued
by the COTP or a designated representative. The COTP or a designated
representative will inform the public through Broadcast Notices to
Mariners of the enforcement period for the safety zone, as well as any
changes in the dates and times of enforcement.

V. Regulatory Analyses

    We developed this rule after considering numerous statutes and
Executive orders related to rulemaking. Below we summarize our analyses
based on a number of these statutes and Executive orders.

A. Regulatory Planning and Review

    Executive Orders 12866 and 13563 direct agencies to assess the
costs and benefits of available regulatory alternatives and, if
regulation is necessary, to select regulatory approaches that maximize
net benefits. Executive Order 13771 directs agencies to control
regulatory costs through a budgeting process. This rule has not been
designated a ``significant regulatory action,'' under Executive Order
12866. Accordingly, this rule has not been reviewed by the Office of
Management and Budget (OMB), and pursuant to OMB guidance it is exempt
from the requirements of Executive Order 13771.
    This regulatory action determination is based on the size,
location, duration and time of day of the temporary safety zone. The
safety zone will last 1 hour and will impact a small designated area of
the Kanawha River. The safety zone will be enforced later in the day
when vessel traffic is normally low. Moreover,

the Coast Guard will issue a Broadcast Notice to Mariners via VHF-FM
marine channel 16 about the zone.

B. Impact on Small Entities

    The Regulatory Flexibility Act of 1980, 5 U.S.C. 601-612, as
amended, requires Federal agencies to consider the potential impact of
regulations on small entities during rulemaking. The term ``small
entities'' comprises small businesses, not-for-profit organizations
that are independently owned and operated and are not dominant in their
fields, and governmental jurisdictions with populations of less than
50,000. The Coast Guard certifies under 5 U.S.C. 605(b) that this rule
will not have a significant economic impact on a substantial number of
small entities.
    While some owners or operators of vessels intending to transit the
safety zone may be small entities, for the reasons stated in section
V.A above, this rule will not have a significant economic impact on any
vessel owner or operator.
    Under section 213(a) of the Small Business Regulatory Enforcement
Fairness Act of 1996 (Pub. L. 104-121), we want to assist small
entities in understanding this rule. If the rule would affect your
small business, organization, or governmental jurisdiction and you have
questions concerning its provisions or options for compliance, please
call or email the person listed in the FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT
section.
    Small businesses may send comments on the actions of Federal
employees who enforce, or otherwise determine compliance with, Federal
regulations to the Small Business and Agriculture Regulatory
Enforcement Ombudsman and the Regional Small Business Regulatory
Fairness Boards. The Ombudsman evaluates these actions annually and
rates each agency's responsiveness to small business. If you wish to
comment on actions by employees of the Coast Guard, call 1-888-REG-FAIR
(1-888-734-3247). The Coast Guard will not retaliate against small
entities that question or complain about this rule or any policy or
action of the Coast Guard.

C. Collection of Information

    This rule will not call for a new collection of information under
the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 (44 U.S.C. 3501-3520).

D. Federalism and Indian Tribal Governments

    A rule has implications for federalism under Executive Order 13132,
Federalism, if it has a substantial direct effect on the States, on the
relationship between the national government and the States, or on the
distribution of power and responsibilities among the various levels of
government. We have analyzed this rule under that Order and have
determined that it is consistent with the fundamental federalism
principles and preemption requirements described in Executive Order
13132.
    Also, this rule does not have tribal implications under Executive
Order 13175, Consultation and Coordination with Indian Tribal
Governments, because it does not have a substantial direct effect on
one or more Indian tribes, on the relationship between the Federal
Government and Indian tribes, or on the distribution of power and
responsibilities between the Federal Government and Indian tribes. If
you believe this rule has implications for federalism or Indian tribes,
please call or email the person listed in the FOR FURTHER INFORMATION
CONTACT section above.

E. Unfunded Mandates Reform Act

    The Unfunded Mandates Reform Act of 1995 (2 U.S.C. 1531-1538)
requires Federal agencies to assess the effects of their discretionary
regulatory actions. In particular, the Act addresses actions that may
result in the expenditure by a State, local, or tribal government, in
the aggregate, or by the private sector of $100,000,000 (adjusted for
inflation) or more in any one year. Though this rule will not result in
such an expenditure, we do discuss the effects of this rule elsewhere
in this preamble.

F. Environment

    We have analyzed this rule under Department of Homeland Security
Directive 023-01 and Environmental Planning COMDTINST 5090.1 (series),
which guide the Coast Guard in complying with the National
Environmental Policy Act of 1969 (42 U.S.C. 4321-4370f), and have
determined that this action is one of a category of actions that do not
individually or cumulatively have a significant effect on the human
environment. This rule involves a safety zone lasting 1 hour that will
prohibit entry into the safety zone from MM 58.1 to MM 59.1 on the
Kanawha River. It is categorically excluded from further review under
paragraph L60(a) in Table 3-1 of U.S. Coast Guard Environmental
Planning Implementing Procedures. A Record of Environmental
Consideration supporting this determination is available in the docket
where indicated under ADDRESSES.

G. Protest Activities

    The Coast Guard respects the First Amendment rights of protesters.
Protesters are asked to contact the person listed in the FOR FURTHER
INFORMATION CONTACT section to coordinate protest activities so that
your message can be received without jeopardizing the safety or
security of people, places or vessels.

List of Subjects in 33 CFR Part 165

    Harbors, Marine safety, Navigation (water), Reporting and
recordkeeping requirements, Security measures, Waterways.

    For the reasons discussed in the preamble, the Coast Guard amends
33 CFR part 165 as follows:

PART 165--REGULATED NAVIGATION AREAS AND LIMITED ACCESS AREAS

0
1. The authority citation for part 165 continues to read as follows:

    Authority: 46 U.S.C. 70034, 70051; 33 CFR 1.05-1, 6.04-1, 6.04-
6, and 160.5; Department of Homeland Security Delegation No. 0170.1.

0
2. Add Sec.  165.T08-0694 to read as follows:

Sec.  165.T08-0694  Safety Zone; Kanawha River, Charleston, WV.

    (a) Location. The following area is a safety zone: All navigable
waters of the Kanawha River from MM 58.1 to MM 59.1.
    (b) Regulations. Under the general safety zone regulations in
subpart C of this part, you may not enter the safety zone described in
paragraph (a) of this section unless authorized by the Captain of the
Port Sector Ohio Valley (COTP) or a designated representative. Persons
or vessels desiring to enter into or pass through the zone must request
permission from the COTP or a designated representative. They may be
contacted on VHF-FM radio channel 16 or phone at 1-800-253-7465.
    (c) Persons and vessels permitted to enter the safety zone must
transit at the slowest safe speed and comply with all lawful directions
issued by the COTP or a designated representative.
    (c) Enforcement period. This section will be enforced from 9:00
p.m. to 10 p.m. on August 30, 2019.
    (d) Informational broadcasts. The COTP or a designated
representative will inform the public through Broadcast Notices to
Mariners of the enforcement period for the safety zone, as well as any
changes in the dates and times of enforcement.

    Dated: August 13, 2019.
A.M. Beach,
Captain, U.S. Coast Guard, Captain of the Port Sector Ohio Valley.
[FR Doc. 2019-17705 Filed 8-16-19; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 9110-04-P


MEMORANDUM

DATE:	June 24, 2014

TO:	Carbon Power Plan for Existing Power Plants; Docket ID: OAR-2013-0602

FROM:	Rob Lawrence EPA/Region 6/PD

SUBJECT:	June 4, 2014 Roll-out Conference Call with Region 6 State Environmental Agency Leaderships Regarding the Proposed Carbon Power Plan for Existing Power Plants

SUMMARY

      A conference call was held between EPA and the attendees listed below on June 4, 2014, to discuss the proposed Carbon Power Plan for Existing Power Plants, which was proposed on June 2, 2014.

ATTENDEES

State Participants *:	Arkansas Department of Environmental Quality (Secretary Teresa Marks) 	Louisiana Department of Environmental Quality (Secretary Peggy Hatch, Sam Phillips, and Brian Johnson) 	New Mexico Environment Department (Secretary Ryan Flynn) 	Oklahoma Department of Environmental Quality (Deputy Secretary Scott Thompson and Eddie Terrell) 	Texas Commission on Environmental Quality (Chairman Bryan Shaw)

*Participated by phone. Others may have been on the phone within the state offices.

EPA Participants:	Regional Administrator (Ron Curry), Deputy Regional Administrator (Sam Coleman), Regional Counsel (Suzanne Murray), Multi-Media Division Director (Wren Stenger), External Affairs Division Director (David Gray), Air Programs Branch Chief (Mark Hansen), Energy Policy Advisor (Rob Lawrence), Advisor to the RA (Tom Ruiz), and Air Planning Section Chief (Guy Donaldson)


[Federal Register Volume 76, Number 113 (Monday, June 13, 2011)]
[Notices]
[Pages 34286-34287]
[FR Doc No: 2011-14538]

=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION

ITS Joint Program Office; Webinar on Connected Vehicle
Infrastructure Deployment Analysis Report Review; Notice of Public
Meeting

AGENCY: Research and Innovative Technology Administration, U.S.
Department of Transportation.

ACTION: Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

    The U.S. Department of Transportation (USDOT) ITS Joint Program
Office (ITS JPO) will host a free public webinar on June 24, 2011 at 1
p.m. (EDT) to discuss the Connected Vehicle Infrastructure Deployment
Analysis Report. The webinar will provide an opportunity for
stakeholders to hear about and provide feedback on the American
Association of State Highway and Transportation Officials (AASHTO)
Connected Vehicle Infrastructure Deployment Analysis Report developed
by the AASHTO Connected Vehicle Working Group with support from USDOT.
The purpose of the report is to explore infrastructure deployment
approaches and potential issues for state and local transportation
agencies, primarily from a state DOT perspective. The analysis does not
significantly consider the needs and interests of transit and trucking
stakeholders, as these communities' visions and issues are being
considered elsewhere in the ITS program in conjunction with their
respective stakeholder organizations.
    The AASHTO Working Group is made up of representatives of eleven
state agencies, along with three local transportation agencies, and one
metropolitan planning organization. Automotive representatives from the
Vehicle Infrastructure Integration Consortium (VIIC), private sector
equipment manufacturers, and telecommunications service providers were
also invited to the Deployment Plan meetings, and they actively and
constructively participated in the discussions leading to this report.
    The report covers connected vehicle applications of most interest
to the states, current state and local programs underway, deployment
readiness in the vehicle market, aftermarket devices and
communications, the magnitude of effort to upgrade the nation's signal
controllers with Dedicated Short Range Communications (DSRC)
capabilities, and a set of deployment scenarios with corresponding
strategies and actions for the state and local transportation
community.
    Connected Vehicle research at the USDOT is a multimodal program
that

involves using wireless communication between vehicles, infrastructure,
and personal communications devices to improve safety, mobility, and
environmental sustainability. The program is the major research
initiative of the ITS JPO, which is currently working with the eight
major automotive companies to develop vehicle crash warning
applications using DSRC technology. In addition, the ITS JPO is working
to develop a myriad of applications which will use data collected from
connected vehicles that can improve safety, mobility and
sustainability. There is also connected vehicle-related research in the
areas of standards, data collection, certification, policy, road
weather, and public transportation.
    Persons planning to attend the webinar should send their full name,
organization, and business e-mail address to Adam Hoops at ITS America
at<EMAIL_ADDRESS>by June 16, 2011. Please specify the name of the
webinar in the e-mail. For additional questions, please contact Adam
Hoops at<PHONE_NUMBER>.

    Issued in Washington, DC on the 6th day of June 2011.
John Augustine,
Managing Director, ITS Joint Program Office.
[FR Doc. 2011-14538 Filed 6-10-11; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910-HY-P


[Federal Register Volume 87, Number 113 (Monday, June 13, 2022)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Pages 35656-35658]
[FR Doc No: 2022-12668]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY

Coast Guard

33 CFR Part 165

[Docket Number USCG-2022-0163]
RIN 1625-1625-AA00

Safety Zone; Tall Ships Challenge Great Lakes 2022; Erie, PA,
Cleveland, OH, and Two Harbors, MN

AGENCY: Coast Guard, DHS.

ACTION: Temporary final rule.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Coast Guard will create safety zones around each tall ship
visiting the Great Lakes during the Tall Ships Challenge 2022 race
series. These safety zones will provide for the regulation of vessel
traffic in the vicinity of each tall ship in the navigable waters of
the United States. The Coast Guard is taking this action to safeguard
participants and spectators from the hazards associated with the
limited maneuverability of these tall ships and to ensure public safety
during tall ships events.

DATES: This rule is effective from 12:01 a.m. June 24, 2022, until
12:01 a.m. on August 29, 2022.

ADDRESSES: To view documents mentioned in this preamble as being
available in the docket, go to https://www.regulations.gov, type USCG-
2022-0163 in the search box and click ``Search.'' Next, in the Document
Type column, select ``Supporting & Related Material.''

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: If you have questions on this rule,
call or email LT Jason Radcliffe, 9th District Waterways Management,
U.S. Coast Guard; telephone<PHONE_NUMBER>, email
[email protected].

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

I. Table of Abbreviations

CFR Code of Federal Regulations
DHS Department of Homeland Security
FR Federal Register
NPRM Notice of proposed rulemaking
Sec.  Section
U.S.C. United States Code

II. Background Information and Regulatory History

    During the Tall Ships Challenge Great Lakes 2022, tall ships will
be participating in maritime parades, training cruises, races, and
mooring in the harbors of Erie, PA, Cleveland, OH, and Two Harbors, MN.
This is a tri-annual event that teaches character building and
leadership through sail training. The Tall Ships event seeks to educate
the public about both the historical aspects of sailing ships as well
as their current use as training vessels for students. Tall ships are
large, traditionally-rigged sailing vessels. The event will consist of
festivals at each port of call, sail training cruises, tall ship
parades, and races between the ports. More information regarding the
Tall Ships Challenge 2022 and the participating vessels can be found at
https://www.tallshipschallenge.com/.
    In response, on 1 April 2022 the Coast Guard published a notice of
proposed rulemaking (NPRM) titled Safety Zone; Tall Ships Challenge
Great Lakes 2022; Erie, PA, Cleveland, OH, and Two Harbors, MN (87 FR
19039). There we stated why we issued the NPRM, and invited comments on
our proposed regulatory action related to this Tall Ships event. During
the comment period that ended 2 May 2022 we received 03 comments from
the public and 01 internal comment, all of which voiced support for the
proposed rule.

III. Legal Authority and Need for Rule

    The Coast Guard is proposing this rulemaking under authority in 46
U.S.C. 70034; 33 CFR 1.05-1, 6.04-1, 6.04-6, and 160.5; DHS Delegation
No. 0170.1. These safety zones are necessary to protect the tall ships
from potential harm and to protect the public from the hazards
associated with the limited maneuverability of tall sailing ships. When
operating under sail, they require a substantial crew to manually turn
the rudder and adjust the sails, therefore they cannot react as quickly
as modern ships. Additionally, during parades of sail, the tall ships
will be following a set course through a crowded harbor, and it is
imperative that spectator craft stay clear since maneuvering the tall
ships to avoid large crowds of spectator craft would not be possible.
Due to the high

profile nature and extensive publicity associated with this event, each
Captain of the Port (COTP) expects a large number of spectators in
confined areas adjacent to the tall ships. The combination of large
numbers of recreational boaters, congested waterways, boaters crossing
commercially transited waterways and low maneuverability of the tall
ships could easily result in serious injuries or fatalities. Therefore,
the Coast Guard will enforce a safety zone around each ship to ensure
the safety of both participants and spectators in these areas.

IV. Discussion of Comments, Changes, and the Rule

    As noted above, we received 04 comments on our NPRM published 01
April 2022. An internal comment was received requesting flexibility for
Captains of the Port to temporarily reduce the 100 yard safety zone
down to 25 yards while ships are inport and moored. The intent of this
request is to provide on-scene Coast Guard crews with a more scaleable
solution to match enforcement logistics to unique local waterway
layouts, narrow navigable channels, and transiting commercial vessel
challenges.There is a change in the regulatory text of this rule from
the proposed rule in the NPRM to reflect this revision.
    This section is effective from 12:01 a.m. on June 24, 2022, through
12:01 a.m. on August 29, 2022. The following areas are safety zones:
All navigable waters of the United States located in the Ninth Coast
Guard District within a 100 yard radius of any tall ship. No person or
vessel is allowed within the safety zone unless authorized by the
cognizant Captain of the Port, their designated representative, or the
on-scene official patrol. When a tall ship approaches any vessel that
is moored or anchored, the stationary vessel must stay moored or
anchored while it remains within the tall ship's safety zone unless
ordered by or given permission from the cognizant Captain of the Port,
their designated representative, or the on-scene official patrol to do
otherwise. Persons or vessels operating within a confined harbor or
channel, where there is not sufficient navigable water outside of the
safety zone to safely maneuver are allowed to operate within the safety
zone and shall travel at the minimum speed necessary to maintain a safe
course. Vessels operating within the safety zone shall not come within
25 yards of a tall ship unless authorized by the cognizant Captain of
the Port, their designated representative, or the on-scene official
patrol. For Tall Ships securely moored inport, where local demands
warrant, the Captain of the Port may temporarily reduce the 100 yard
Safety Zone down to 25 yards.

V. Regulatory Analyses

    We developed this rule after considering numerous statutes and
Executive orders related to rulemaking. Below we summarize our analyses
based on a number of these statutes and Executive orders, and we
discuss First Amendment rights of protestors.

A. Regulatory Planning and Review

    Executive Orders 12866 and 13563 direct agencies to assess the
costs and benefits of available regulatory alternatives and, if
regulation is necessary, to select regulatory approaches that maximize
net benefits. This rule has not been designated a ``significant
regulatory action,'' under Executive Order 12866. Accordingly, this
rule has not been reviewed by the Office of Management and Budget
(OMB).
    This regulatory action determination is based on the size,
location, duration, and time-of-day of the safety zone. Vessel traffic
would be able to safely transit around this safety zone or through it
at slow speed in congested areas. Moreover, the Coast Guard would issue
a Broadcast Notice to Mariners via VHF-FM marine channel 16 about the
zone, and the rule would allow vessels to seek permission to enter the
zone.

B. Impact on Small Entities

    The Regulatory Flexibility Act of 1980, 5 U.S.C. 601-612, as
amended, requires Federal agencies to consider the potential impact of
regulations on small entities during rulemaking. The term ``small
entities'' comprises small businesses, not-for-profit organizations
that are independently owned and operated and are not dominant in their
fields, and governmental jurisdictions with populations of less than
50,000. The Coast Guard received 00 comments from the Small Business
Administration on this rulemaking. The Coast Guard certifies under 5
U.S.C. 605(b) that this rule will not have a significant economic
impact on a substantial number of small entities.
    While some owners or operators of vessels intending to transit the
safety zone may be small entities, for the reasons stated in section
V.A above, this rule will not have a significant economic impact on any
vessel owner or operator.
    Under section 213(a) of the Small Business Regulatory Enforcement
Fairness Act of 1996 (Pub. L. 104-121), we want to assist small
entities in understanding this rule. If the rule would affect your
small business, organization, or governmental jurisdiction and you have
questions concerning its provisions or options for compliance, please
call or email the person listed in the FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT
section.
    Small businesses may send comments on the actions of Federal
employees who enforce, or otherwise determine compliance with, Federal
regulations to the Small Business and Agriculture Regulatory
Enforcement Ombudsman and the Regional Small Business Regulatory
Fairness Boards. The Ombudsman evaluates these actions annually and
rates each agency's responsiveness to small business. If you wish to
comment on actions by employees of the Coast Guard, call 1-888-REG-FAIR
(1-888-734-3247). The Coast Guard will not retaliate against small
entities that question or complain about this rule or any policy or
action of the Coast Guard.

C. Collection of Information

    This rule will not call for a new collection of information under
the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 (44 U.S.C. 3501-3520).

D. Federalism and Indian Tribal Governments

    A rule has implications for federalism under Executive Order 13132,
Federalism, if it has a substantial direct effect on the States, on the
relationship between the National Government and the States, or on the
distribution of power and responsibilities among the various levels of
government. We have analyzed this rule under that Order and have
determined that it is consistent with the fundamental federalism
principles and preemption requirements described in Executive Order
13132.
    Also, this rule does not have tribal implications under Executive
Order 13175, Consultation and Coordination with Indian Tribal
Governments, because it does not have a substantial direct effect on
one or more Indian tribes, on the relationship between the Federal
Government and Indian tribes, or on the distribution of power and
responsibilities between the Federal Government and Indian tribes.

E. Unfunded Mandates Reform Act

    The Unfunded Mandates Reform Act of 1995 (2 U.S.C. 1531-1538)
requires Federal agencies to assess the effects of their discretionary
regulatory actions. In particular, the Act addresses actions that may
result in the expenditure by a State, local, or tribal government, in
the

aggregate, or by the private sector of $100,000,000 (adjusted for
inflation) or more in any one year. Though this rule will not result in
such an expenditure, we do discuss the effects of this rule elsewhere
in this preamble.

F. Environment

    We have analyzed this rule under Department of Homeland Security
Directive 023-01, Rev. 1, associated implementing instructions, and
Environmental Planning COMDTINST 5090.1 (series), which guide the Coast
Guard in complying with the National Environmental Policy Act of 1969
(42 U.S.C. 4321-4370f), and have determined that this action is one of
a category of actions that do not individually or cumulatively have a
significant effect on the human environment. This rule involves a
safety zone surrounding each vessel participating in the 2022 Tall
Ships Challenge in the Great Lakes from 12:01 a.m. on June 24, 2022,
through 12:01 a.m. on August 29, 2022. It is categorically excluded
from further review under paragraph L60(a) of Appendix A, Table 1 of
DHS Instruction Manual 023-01-001-01, Rev. 1. A Record of Environmental
Consideration supporting this determination is available in the docket.
For instructions on locating the docket, see the ADDRESSES section of
this preamble.

G. Protest Activities

    The Coast Guard respects the First Amendment rights of protesters.
Protesters are asked to call or email the person listed in the FOR
FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT section to coordinate protest activities so
that your message can be received without jeopardizing the safety or
security of people, places or vessels.

List of Subjects in 33 CFR Part 165

    Harbors, Marine safety, Navigation (water), Reporting and
recordkeeping requirements, Security measures, Waterways.

    For the reasons discussed in the preamble, the Coast Guard amends
33 CFR part 165 as follows:

PART 165--REGULATED NAVIGATION AREAS AND LIMITED ACCESS AREAS

0
1. The authority citation for part 165 continues to read as follows:

    Authority:  46 U.S.C. 70034, 70051; 33 CFR 1.05-1, 6.04-1, 6.04-
6, and 160.5; Department of Homeland Security Delegation No.
00170.1, Revision No. 01.2.

0
2. Add Sec.  165.T09-0163 to read as follows:

Sec.  165.T09-0163   Safety Zone; Tall Ships Challenge Great Lakes
2022; Erie, PA, Cleveland, OH, and Two Harbors, MN.

    (a) Definitions. The following definitions apply to this section:
    (1) Navigation rules means the Navigation Rules, International and
Inland (see, 1972 COLREGS (33 CFR chapter I, subchapters D and E) and
33 U.S.C. 2001 et seq.).
    (2) Official patrol means those persons designated by Captain of
the Port Buffalo and Sault Ste. Marie to monitor a tall ship safety
zone, permit entry into the zone, give legally enforceable orders to
persons or vessels within the zone, and take other actions authorized
by the cognizant Captain of the Port.
    (3) Public vessel means vessels owned, chartered, or operated by
the United States or by a State or political subdivision thereof.
    (4) Tall ship means any sailing vessel participating in the Tall
Ships Challenge 2022 in the Great Lakes.
    (b) Location. The following areas are safety zones: All navigable
waters of the United States located in the Ninth Coast Guard District
within a 100 yard radius of any tall ship.
    (c) Regulations. (1) No person or vessel is allowed within the
safety zone unless authorized by the cognizant Captain of the Port,
their designated representative, or the on-scene official patrol.
    (2) Persons or vessels operating within a confined harbor or
channel, where there is not sufficient navigable water outside of the
safety zone to safely maneuver are allowed to operate within the safety
zone and shall travel at the minimum speed necessary to maintain a safe
course. Vessels operating within the safety zone shall not come within
25 yards of a tall ship unless authorized by the cognizant Captain of
the Port, their designated representative, or the on-scene official
patrol.
    (3) When a tall ship approaches any vessel that is moored or
anchored, the stationary vessel must stay moored or anchored while it
remains within the tall ship's safety zone unless ordered by or given
permission from the cognizant Captain of the Port, their designated
representative, or the on-scene official patrol to do otherwise.
    (4) For tall ships securely moored inport, where local demands
warrant, the Captain of the Port may temporarily reduce the 100 yard
Safety Zone down to 25 yards.
    (d) Effective period. This section is effective from 12:01 a.m. on
June 24, 2022, through 12:01 a.m. on August 29, 2022.
    (e) Navigation rules. The navigation rules shall apply at all times
within a tall ships safety zone.

    Dated: June 6, 2022.
M.J. Johnston,
Rear Admiral, U.S. Coast Guard, Commander, Ninth Coast Guard District.
[FR Doc. 2022-12668 Filed 6-10-22; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 9110-04-P


[Federal Register: March 1, 2007 (Volume 72, Number 40)]
[Notices]
[Page 9363-9364]
[DOCID:fr01mr07-115]

=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

[Release No. IC-27739]

Notice of Applications for Deregistration Under Section 8(f) of
the Investment Company Act of 1940

February 23, 2007.
    The following is a notice of applications for deregistration under
section 8(f) of the Investment Company Act of 1940 for the month of
February, 2007. A copy of each application may be obtained for a fee at
the SEC's Public Reference Branch (tel.<PHONE_NUMBER>). An order
granting each application will be issued unless the SEC orders a
hearing. Interested persons may request a hearing on any application by
writing to the SEC's Secretary at the address below and serving the
relevant applicant with a copy of the request, personally or by mail.
Hearing requests should be received by the SEC by 5:30 p.m. on March
20, 2007, and should be accompanied by proof of service on the
applicant, in the form of an affidavit or, for lawyers, a certificate
of service. Hearing requests should state the nature of the writer's
interest, the reason for the request, and the issues contested. Persons
who wish to be notified of a hearing may request notification by
writing to the Secretary, U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission, 100
F Street, NE., Washington, DC 20549-1090.
    For Further Information Contact: Diane L. Titus at<PHONE_NUMBER>,
SEC, Division of Investment Management, Office of Investment Company
Regulation, 100 F Street, NE., Washington, DC 20549-4041.

Eagle Growth Shares Investing Programs [File No. 811-2018]

    Summary: Applicant, a unit investment trust, seeks an order
declaring that it has ceased to be an investment company. On November
27, 2001, applicant made a liquidating distribution to its
shareholders, based on net asset value. Expenses of $2,145 incurred in
connection with the liquidating distribution were paid by Baxter
Financial Corp., applicant's sponsor, and Eagle Growth Shares, Inc.
    Filing Dates: The application was filed on October 20, 2006, and
amended on January 26, 2007.
    Applicant's Address: Federated Investors Tower, 5800 Corporate Dr.,
Pittsburgh, PA 15237-1200 North Federal Hwy., Suite 424, Boca Raton, FL
33432.

Credit Suisse Institutional Fixed Income Fund, Inc. [File No. 811-8917]

Credit Suisse Small Cap Growth Fund, Inc. [File No. 811-7909]

Credit Suisse Fixed Income Fund [File No. 811-5039]

    Summary: Each applicant seeks an order declaring that it has ceased
to be an investment company. Between November 29, 2006 and December 22,
2006, each applicant made a liquidating distribution to its
shareholders, based on net asset value. Expenses of $8,500 incurred in
connection with each liquidation were paid by Credit Suisse Asset
Management, LLC, investment adviser to each applicant. Applicants have
retained cash in the amount of $32,472, $22,334 and $106,421,
respectively, to cover certain additional outstanding liabilities.
    Filing Date: The applications were filed on February 7, 2007.
    Applicants' Address: c/o Credit Suisse Asset Management, LLC,
Eleven Madison Ave., New York, NY 10010.

Federated Municipal High Yield Advantage Fund, Inc. [File No. 811-4533]

    Summary: Applicant seeks an order declaring that it has ceased to
be an investment company. On November 10, 2006, applicant transferred
its assets to Federated Municipal High Yield Advantage Fund, a
portfolio of Federated Municipal Securities Income Trust, based on net
asset value. Expenses of $86,399 incurred in connection with the
reorganization were

paid by applicant and the acquiring fund.
    Filing Date: The application was filed on January 16, 2007.
    Applicant's Address: Federated Investors Tower, 5800 Corporate Dr.,
Pittsburgh, PA 15237-7010.

Pioneer Tax Qualified Dividend Fund [File No. 811-21459]

Pioneer International Income and Growth Trust [File No. 811-21535]

Pioneer Municipal High Yield Trust [File No. 811-21717]

    Summary: Each applicant, a closed-end investment company, seeks an
order declaring that it has ceased to be an investment company.
Applicants have never made a public offering of their securities and do
not propose to make a public offering or engage in business of any
kind.
    Filing Date: The applications were filed on February 6, 2007.
    Applicants' Address: 60 State St., Boston, MA 02109.

Liberty All-Star Mid-Cap Fund [File No. 811-21733]

    Summary: Applicant, a closed-end investment company, seeks an order
declaring that it has ceased to be an investment company. Applicant has
never made a public offering of its securities and does not propose to
make a public offering or engage in business of any kind.
    Filing Dates: The application was filed on December 29, 2006, and
amended on February 2, 2007.
    Applicant's Address: 100 Federal St., Boston, MA 02110.

Ameritrade Automatic Common Exchange Security Trust [File No. 811-9319]

    Summary: Applicant, a closed-end investment company, seeks an order
declaring that it has ceased to be an investment company. Applicant has
never made a public offering of its securities and does not propose to
make a public offering or engage in business of any kind.
    Filing Dates: The application was filed on December 5, 2006, and
amended January 31, 2007.
    Applicant's Address: Attn: Heather Sahrbeck, Goldman, Sachs & Co.,
85 Broad St., New York, NY 10004.

Pioneer AllWeather Fund LLC [File No. 811-21408]

    Summary: Applicant, a closed-end investment company, seeks an order
declaring that it has ceased to be an investment company. Applicant has
never made a public offering of its securities and does not propose to
make a public offering or engage in business of any kind.
    Filing Dates: The application was filed on October 27, 2004, and
amended on February 6, 2007.
    Applicant's Address: 60 State St., Boston, MA 02109.

    For the Commission, by the Division of Investment Management,
pursuant to delegated authority.
Florence E. Harmon,
 Deputy Secretary.
[FR Doc. E7-3555 Filed 2-28-07; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 8010-01-P


[Federal Register Volume 84, Number 186 (Wednesday, September 25, 2019)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Pages 50304-50305]
[FR Doc No: 2019-20689]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION

Federal Aviation Administration

14 CFR Part 71

[Docket No. FAA-2019-0676 Airspace Docket No. 19-AWA-3]
RIN 2120-AA66

Amendment of Class C Airspace; Lafayette, LA

AGENCY: Federal Aviation Administration (FAA), DOT.

ACTION: Final rule.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: This action modifies the Lafayette, LA, Class C airspace area
by amending the legal description to contain the current airport name
and updated airport reference point (ARP) information. Additionally,
minor administrative edits to the legal description title and Chart
Supplement reference are made for readability. This action does not
change the boundaries, altitudes, or operating requirements of the
Class C airspace area.

DATES: Effective date 0901 UTC, December 5, 2019. The Director of the
Federal Register approves this incorporation by reference action under
Title 1 Code of Federal Regulations part 51, subject to the annual
revision of FAA Order 7400.11 and publication of conforming amendments.

ADDRESSES: FAA Order 7400.11D, Airspace Designations and Reporting
Points, and subsequent amendments can be viewed online at http://www.faa.gov/air_traffic/publications/. For further information, you can
contact the Airspace Policy Group, Federal Aviation Administration, 800
Independence Avenue SW, Washington, DC 20591; telephone: (202) 267-
8783. The Order is also available for inspection at the National
Archives and Records Administration (NARA). For information on the
availability of FAA Order 7400.11D at NARA, email<EMAIL_ADDRESS>or go to https://www.archives.gov/federal-register/cfr/ibr-locations.html.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Colby Abbott, Airspace Policy Group,
Office of Airspace Services, Federal Aviation Administration, 800
Independence Avenue SW, Washington, DC 20591; telephone: (202) 267-
8783.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

Authority for This Rulemaking

    The FAA's authority to issue rules regarding aviation safety is
found in Title 49 of the United States Code. Subtitle I, Section 106
describes the authority of the FAA Administrator. Subtitle VII,
Aviation Programs, describes in more detail the scope of the agency's
authority. This rulemaking is promulgated under the authority described
in Subtitle VII, Part A, Subpart I, Section 40103. Under that section,
the FAA is charged with prescribing regulations to assign the use of
airspace necessary to ensure the safety of aircraft and the efficient
use of airspace. This regulation is within the scope of that authority
as it updates the airport name and ARP geographic coordinates for the
Lafayette Regional Airport/Paul Fournet Field that is contained in the
Lafayette, LA, Class C airspace description.

History

    Class C airspace areas are designed to improve air safety by
reducing the risk of midair collisions in high volume airport terminal
areas and to enhance the management of air traffic operations in that
area. During a recent review of the Lafayette Regional Airport/Paul
Fournet Field, LA, Class C airspace area description, the FAA
identified that the airport's name and ARP geographic coordinates were
incorrect. This action updates the airport name and ARP geographic
coordinates to coincide with the FAA's aeronautical database
information. There are no changes to routing or air traffic control
procedures resulting from this action.
    Class C airspace designations are published in paragraph 4000 of
FAA Order 7400.11D, dated August 8, 2019, and effective September 15,
2019, which is incorporated by reference in 14 CFR part 71.1. The Class
C airspace designation listed in this document will be published
subsequently in the Order.
    FAA Order 7400.11, Airspace Designations and Reporting Points, is
published yearly and effective on September 15.

Availability and Summary of Documents for Incorporation by Reference

    This document amends FAA Order 7400.11D, Airspace Designations and
Reporting Points, dated August 8, 2019, and effective September 15,
2019. FAA Order 7400.11D is publicly available as listed in the
ADDRESSES section of this document. FAA Order 7400.11D lists Class A,
B, C, D, and E airspace areas, air traffic service routes, and
reporting points.

The Rule

    This action amends Title 14 Code of Federal Regulations (14 CFR)
part 71 by amending the Lafayette Regional Airport, LA, airspace area
description. The airport formerly known as ``Lafayette Regional
Airport'' is renamed ``Lafayette Regional Airport/Paul Fournet Field''
and the ARP geographic position for the airport is changed from ``lat.
30[deg]12'19'' N, long. 91[deg]59'15'' W'' to ``lat. 30[deg]12'18'' N,
long. 91[deg]59'16'' W.'' These amendments to the airport name and ARP
geographic coordinates reflect the current information in the FAA's
aeronautical database. Additionally, minor administrative edits to the
legal description title and Chart Supplement reference were made for
readability.
    This is an administrative change and does not affect the
boundaries, altitudes, or operating requirements of the airspace,
therefore, notice and public procedure under 5 U.S.C. 553(b) is
unnecessary.

Regulatory Notices and Analyses

    The FAA has determined that this regulation only involves an
established body of technical regulations for which frequent and
routine amendments are necessary to keep them operationally current.
It, therefore: (1) Is not a ``significant regulatory action'' under
Executive Order 12866; (2) is not a ``significant rule'' under
Department of Transportation (DOT) Regulatory Policies and Procedures
(44 FR 11034; February 26, 1979); and (3) does not warrant preparation
of a Regulatory Evaluation as the anticipated impact is so minimal.
Since this is a routine matter that only affects air traffic procedures
and air navigation, it is certified that this rule, when promulgated,
does not have a significant economic impact on a substantial number of
small entities under the criteria of the Regulatory Flexibility Act.

Environmental Review

    The FAA has determined that this action qualifies for categorical
exclusion under the National Environmental Policy Act, and its agency
implementing regulations in FAA Order 1050.1F, ``Environmental Impacts:
Policies and Procedures'' regarding categorical exclusions for
procedural actions at paragraph 5-6.5a, which categorically excludes
from full environmental impact review rulemaking actions that designate
or modify classes of airspace areas, airways, routes, and reporting
points. Since this action does not change the boundaries, altitudes, or
operating requirements of the Class C airspace area, and only amends
the legal description to contain the current airport name of Lafayette
Regional Airport/Paul Fournet Field, LA, and updated ARP information,
this airspace action is not expected to cause any potentially
significant environmental impacts. In accordance with FAAO

1050.1F, paragraph 5-2 regarding Extraordinary Circumstances, this
action has been reviewed for factors and circumstances in which a
normally categorically excluded action may have a significant
environmental impact requiring further analysis, and it is determined
that no extraordinary circumstances exist that warrant preparation of
an environmental assessment.

Lists of Subjects in 14 CFR Part 71

    Airspace, Incorporation by reference, Navigation (Air).

Adoption of the Amendment

    In consideration of the foregoing, the Federal Aviation
Administration amends 14 CFR part 71 as follows:

PART 71--DESIGNATION OF CLASS A, B, C, D, AND E AIRSPACE AREAS; AIR
TRAFFIC SERVICE ROUTES; AND REPORTING POINTS

0
1. The authority citation for Part 71 continues to read as follows:

    Authority:  49 U.S.C. 106(f), 106(g); 40103, 40113, 40120; E.O.
10854, 24 FR 9565, 3 CFR, 1959-1963 Comp., p. 389.

Sec.  71.1  [Amended]

0
2. The incorporation by reference in 14 CFR 71.1 of FAA Order 7400.11D,
Airspace Designations and Reporting Points, dated August 8, 2019,
effective September 15, 2019, is amended as follows:

Paragraph 4000 Class C Airspace.

* * * * *

ASW LA C Lafayette, LA

Lafayette Regional Airport/Paul Fournet Field, LA
    (Lat. 30[deg]12'18'' N, long. 91[deg]59'16'' W)

    That airspace extending upward from the surface to and including
4,000 feet MSL within a 5-mile radius of the Lafayette Regional
Airport/Paul Fournet Field, and that airspace extending upward from
1,300 feet MSL to 4,000 feet MSL within a 10-mile radius of the
airport. This Class C airspace area is effective during the specific
days and times of operation of Lafayette Tower and Approach Control
Facility as established in advance by a Notice to Airmen. The
effective dates and times will thereafter be continuously published
in the Chart Supplement.

    Issued in Washington, DC, on September 18, 2019.
Scott M. Rosenbloom,
Acting Manager, Airspace Policy Group.
[FR Doc. 2019-20689 Filed 9-24-19; 8:45 am]
 BILLING CODE 4910-13-P


[Federal Register Volume 80, Number 160 (Wednesday, August 19, 2015)]
[Notices]
[Pages 50287-50288]
[FR Doc No: 2015-20500]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY

[EPA-HQ-OPP-2006-0955; FRL-9930-59]

Product Cancellation Order for Certain Pesticide Registrations

AGENCY: Environmental Protection Agency (EPA).

ACTION: Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: This notice announces EPA's order for cancellation of certain
pesticide products, identified in Table 1, Unit II, which were
voluntarily deleted by the registrant and accepted by the Agency,
pursuant to the Federal Insecticide, Fungicide, and Rodenticide Act
(FIFRA). This cancellation order follows a March 13, 2013 Federal
Register, Notice of Receipt of Request from the registrant listed in
Table 2 of Unit II to voluntarily cancel these product registrations.
In the March 13, 2013 Notice, EPA indicated that it would issue an
order implementing the cancellation of the subject products, unless the
Agency received substantive comments within the 30-day comment period
that would merit its further review of these requests, or unless the
registrant withdrew their request. The Agency did not receive any
comments on the notice. Further, the registrant did not withdraw their
request. Accordingly, EPA hereby issues in this notice a cancellation
order granting the requested cancellations. Any distribution, sale, or
use of the products subject to this cancellation order is permitted
only in accordance with the terms of this order, including any existing
stocks provisions.

DATES: The cancellations are effective August 19, 2015.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Caitlin Newcamp, Pesticide Re-
Evaluation Division (7508P), Office of Pesticide Programs,
Environmental Protection Agency, 1200 Pennsylvania Ave. NW.,
Washington, DC 20460-0001; telephone number:<PHONE_NUMBER>; email
address<EMAIL_ADDRESS>
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

I. General Information

A. Does this action apply to me?

    This action is directed to the public in general, and may be of
interest to a wide range of stakeholders including environmental, human
health, and agricultural advocates; the chemical industry; pesticide
users; and members of the public interested in the sale, distribution,
or use of pesticides. Since others also may be interested, the Agency
has not attempted to describe all the specific entities that may be
affected by this action.

B. How can I get copies of this document and other related information?

    The docket for this action, identified by docket identification
(ID) number EPA-HQ-OPP-2006-0955, is available at http://www.regulations.gov or at the Office of Pesticide Programs Regulatory
Public Docket (OPP Docket) in the Environmental Protection Agency
Docket Center (EPA/DC), West William Jefferson Clinton Bldg., Rm. 3334,
1301 Constitution Ave. NW., Washington, DC 20460-0001. The Public
Reading Room is open from 8:30 a.m. to 4:30 p.m., Monday through
Friday, excluding legal holidays. The telephone number for the Public
Reading Room is<PHONE_NUMBER>, and the telephone number for the OPP
Docket is<PHONE_NUMBER>. Please review the visitor instructions and
additional information about the docket available at http://www.epa.gov/dockets.

II. What action is the Agency taking?

    This notice announces the cancellation, as requested by the
registrant, of products registered under FIFRA section 3 (7 U.S.C.
136a). These registrations are listed in sequence by registration
number in Table 1 of this unit.

                     Table 1--Product Cancellations
------------------------------------------------------------------------
    EPA Registration No.          Product name          Chemical name
------------------------------------------------------------------------
8845-39.....................  Rid-A-Rat and Mouse   Warfarin.
                               Killer.

8845-125....................  Hot Shot Sudden       Bromethalin.
                               Death Brand Mouse
                               Killer.
8845-126....................  Hot Shot Sudden       Bromethalin.
                               Death Brand Rat
                               Killer 1.
8845-127....................  Hot Shot Sudden       Bromethalin.
                               Death Brand Mouse
                               and Rat Killer.
8845-128....................  Hot Shot Sudden       Bromethalin.
                               Death Brand Mouse
                               Killer Bait Station.
------------------------------------------------------------------------

    Table 2 of this unit includes the names and addresses of record for
all the registrants of the products in Table 1 of this unit, in
sequence by EPA company number. This number corresponds to the first
part of the EPA registration numbers of the products listed in Table 1
of this unit.

               Table 2--Registrants of Cancelled Products
------------------------------------------------------------------------
              EPA Company No.                 Company name and address
------------------------------------------------------------------------
8845......................................  Spectrum Group, A Division
                                             of United Industries, 1
                                             Rider Trail Plaza Drive,
                                             Suite 300, Earth City, MO
                                             63045.
------------------------------------------------------------------------

III. Summary of Public Comments Received and Agency Response to
Comments

    During the public comment period provided, EPA received no comments
in response to the March 13, 2013 Federal Register (78 FR 15949) (FRL-
9379-4) notice announcing the Agency's receipt of the request for
voluntary cancellation of products listed in Table 1 of Unit II.

IV. Cancellation Order

    Pursuant to FIFRA section 6(f) (7 U.S.C. 136d(f)), EPA hereby
approves the requested cancellation of the registrations identified in
Table 1 of Unit II. Accordingly, the Agency hereby orders that the
product registrations identified in Table 1 of Unit II are canceled.
The effective date of the cancellations that are the subject of this
notice is August 19, 2015. Any distribution, sale, or use of existing
stocks of the products identified in Table 1 of Unit II in a manner
inconsistent with any of the provisions for disposition of existing
stocks set forth in Unit VI will be a violation of FIFRA.

V. What is the Agency's authority for taking this action?

    Section 6(f)(1) of FIFRA (7 U.S.C. 136d(f)(1)) provides that a
registrant of a pesticide product may at any time request that any of
its pesticide registrations be canceled or amended to terminate one or
more uses. FIFRA further provides that, before acting on the request,
EPA must publish a notice of receipt of any such request in the Federal
Register. Thereafter, following the public comment period, the EPA
Administrator may approve such a request. The notice of receipt for
this action was published for comment in the Federal Register of March
13, 2013 (78 FR 15949). The comment period closed on April 12, 2013.

VI. Provisions for Disposition of Existing Stocks

    Existing stocks are those stocks of canceled pesticide products
that are in the United States and that were appropriately packaged,
labeled, and released for shipment prior to the effective date of
cancellation of the underlying registration. The existing stocks
provisions for the products subject to this order are as follows.
    The registrant is prohibited from selling or distributing existing
stocks above as of August 19, 2015, except for export in accordance
with FIFRA section 17 (7 U.S.C. 136o), or proper disposal. Persons
other than the registrant may sell, distribute, or use existing stocks
of products listed above until existing stocks are exhausted, provided
that such sale, distribution, or use is consistent with the terms of
the previously approved labeling on, or that accompanied, the canceled
products.

    Authority: 7 U.S.C. 136 et seq.

    Dated: July 27, 2015.
Richard P. Keigwin, Jr.,
Director, Pesticide Re-Evaluation Division, Office of Pesticide
Programs.
[FR Doc. 2015-20500 Filed 8-18-15; 8:45 am]
 BILLING CODE 6560-50-P


[Federal Register Volume 78, Number 5 (Tuesday, January 8, 2013)]
[Notices]
[Pages 1217-1218]
[FR Doc No: 2013-00090]

=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY

Coast Guard

[Docket No. USCG-2012-1080]

Merchant Marine Personnel Advisory Committee; Vacancies

AGENCY: Coast Guard, DHS.

ACTION: Request for applications.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Coast Guard seeks applications for membership on the
Merchant Marine Personnel Advisory Committee (MERPAC). This Committee
advises the Secretary of the Department of Homeland Security on matters
related to personnel in the U.S. merchant marine, including but not
limited to training, qualifications, certification, documentation, and
fitness standards.

DATES: Applicants should submit a cover letter and resume in time to
reach the Alternate Designated Federal Officer (ADFO) on or before
March 11, 2013.

ADDRESSES: Applicants should send their cover letter and resume to the
following address: Commandant (CG-OES-1), ATTN MERPAC, US Coast Guard,
2100 2ND ST SW STOP 7126, WASHINGTON DC 20593-7126; or by faxing (202)
372-1926; or by emailing to<EMAIL_ADDRESS>This notice is
available in our online docket, USCG-2012-1080, at http://www.regulations.gov.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Davis J. Breyer, ADFO of MERPAC;
telephone<PHONE_NUMBER> or email at<EMAIL_ADDRESS>
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: MERPAC is a Federal advisory committee
established under the authority of section 871 of The Homeland Security
Act of 2002, (Title 6, United States Code, section 451). This committee
is established in accordance with and operates under the provisions of
the Federal Advisory Committee Act (FACA) (Title 5, United States Code,
Appendix). MERPAC advises the Secretary of the Department of Homeland
Security on matters relating to personnel in the U.S. merchant marine,
including but not limited to training, qualifications, certification,
documentation, and fitness standards. The Committee will advise,
consult with, and make recommendations reflecting its independent
judgment to the Secretary.
    MERPAC is expected to meet approximately twice a year as called for
by its charter, once at or near Coast Guard Headquarters, Washington,
DC, and once at a location outside of Washington. It may also meet for
extraordinary purposes. Its subcommittees and working groups may also
meet to consider specific tasks as required.
    We will consider applications for six positions that expire or
become vacant on June 1, 2013. To be eligible, you should have
experience in one or more of the following areas of expertise: One
position for a marine educator representing the viewpoint of State
Maritime Academies; one position for a licensed engineering officer who
is licensed as either a limited chief engineer or a designated duty
engineer; one position for a licensed deck officer with an unlimited
tonnage master's license with experience on tank vessels; one position
for a member who represents the viewpoint of shipping companies
employed in ship operation management; one position for an unlicensed
seaman who represents the viewpoint of Qualified Members of the Engine
Department; and one position for a member who will be drawn from the
general public.
    If you are selected as a member from the general public, you will
be appointed and serve as a Special Government Employee (SGE) as
defined in section 202(a) of title 18, United States Code. As a
candidate for appointment as a SGE, applicants are required to complete
a Confidential Financial Disclosure Report (OGE Form 450). A completed
OGE Form 450 is not releasable to the public except under an order
issued by a Federal court or as otherwise provided under the Privacy
Act (5 U.S.C. 552a). Only the Designated Agency Ethics Official (DAEO)
or his or her designee may release a Confidential Financial Disclosure
Report. Applicants can obtain this form by going to the Web site of the
Office of Government Ethics (www.oge.gov) or by contacting the
individual listed above in the FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT section
of this notice. Applications not accompanied by a completed OGE-Form
450 will not be considered.
    Registered lobbyists are not eligible to serve on federal advisory
committees. Registered lobbyists are lobbyists required to comply with
provisions contained in the Lobbying Disclosure Act of 1995 (Pub. L.
104-65 as amended).
    Each MERPAC committee member serves a term of office of up to three
years. Members may be considered to serve consecutive terms. All
members serve without compensation from the Federal Government;
however, upon request, they do receive travel reimbursement and per
diem.
    The Department of Homeland Security (DHS) does not discriminate in
employment on the basis of race, color, religion, sex, national origin,
political affiliation, sexual orientation, gender identity, marital
status, disability and genetic information, age, membership in an
employee organization, or any other non-merit factor.
    If you are interested in applying to become a member of the
Committee, send your cover letter and resume to Davis J. Breyer, ADFO
of MERPAC by mail, fax, or email according to the instructions in the
ADDRESSES section of this notice. Send your cover letter and resume in
time for it to be received by the ADFO on or before March 11, 2013.
    To visit our online docket, go to http://www.regulations.gov, enter
the docket number for this notice (USCG-2012-1080) in the Search box,
and click ``Search''. Please do not post your resume on this site.
During the vetting process, applicants may be asked to provide date of
birth and social security number.

    Dated: December 31, 2012.
J. G. Lantz,
Director of Commercial Regulations and Standards.
[FR Doc. 2013-00090 Filed 1-7-13; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 9110-04-P


[Federal Register: July 3, 2008 (Volume 73, Number 129)]
[Notices]
[Page 38192-38193]
[DOCID:fr03jy08-37]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission

[Docket No. ER08-1117-000]

DC Energy Southwest, LLC; Supplemental Notice That Initial
Market-Based Rate Filing Includes Request for Blanket Section 204
Authorization

June 25, 2008.
    This is a supplemental notice in the above-referenced proceeding of
DC Energy Southwest, LLC's application for market-based rate authority,
with an accompanying rate schedule, noting that such application
includes a request for blanket authorization, under 18 CFR Part 34, of
future issuances of securities and assumptions of liability.
    Any person desiring to intervene or to protest should file with the
Federal Energy Regulatory Commission, 888 First Street, NE.,
Washington, DC 20426, in accordance with Rules 211 and 214 of the
Commission's Rules of Practice and Procedure (18 CFR 385.211 and
385.214). Anyone filing a motion to intervene or protest must serve a
copy of that document on the Applicant.
    Notice is hereby given that the deadline for filing interventions
and protests with regard to the applicant's request for blanket
authorization, under 18 CFR Part 34, of future issuances of securities
and assumptions of liability, is July 15, 2008.
    The Commission encourages electronic submission of protests and
interventions in lieu of paper, using the FERC Online links at http://
www.ferc.gov. To facilitate electronic service, persons with Internet
access who will eFile a document and/or be listed as a contact for an
intervenor must create and validate an eRegistration account using the
eRegistration link. Select the eFiling link to log on and submit the
intervention or protests.
    Persons unable to file electronically should submit an original and
14 copies of the intervention or protest to the Federal Energy
Regulatory Commission, 888 First St., NE., Washington, DC 20426.
    The filings in the above-referenced proceeding are accessible in
the Commission's eLibrary system by clicking on the appropriate link in
the above list. They are also available for review in the Commission's
Public Reference Room in Washington, DC. There is an eSubscription link
on the Web site that enables subscribers to receive e-mail notification
when a document is added to a subscribed

dockets(s). For assistance with any FERC Online service, please e-mail
<EMAIL_ADDRESS>or call<PHONE_NUMBER> (toll free). For
TTY, call<PHONE_NUMBER>.

Kimberly D. Bose,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. E8-15092 Filed 7-2-08; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 6717-01-P


			  UNITED STATES OF AMERICA

		        DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION

			  OFFICE OF THE SECRETARY

			          WASHINGTON, D.C.

Issued by the Department of Transportation on May 29, 2003

NOTICE OF ACTION TAKEN -- DOCKET OST-97-2676

________________________________________________________________________
________________________________________________________

This serves as notice to the public of the action described below, taken
by the Department official indicated (no additional confirming order
will be issued in this matter).

Applicant:  Aviateca, S.A.							Date Filed:  April 22, 2003

Relief requested: Exemption from 49 U.S.C. § 41301 to (1) engage in
scheduled foreign air transportation of persons, property and mail from
points behind Guatemala via Guatemala and intermediate points to a point
or points in the United States and beyond; (2) engage in scheduled
foreign air transportation of property and mail between the United
States and any point or points; and (3) conduct charter foreign air
transportation pursuant to the Air Transport Agreement between the
United States and Guatemala, and other charters subject to Part 212 of
our rules.

If renewal, date and citation of last action:  August 1, 2001, in this
docket

Applicant representative:  John R. Brimsek<PHONE_NUMBER>

DOT Analyst:  Gordon H. Bingham<PHONE_NUMBER>

Responsive pleadings:  None filed

	DISPOSITION

Action:  Approved								Action date:  May 29, 2003

Effective dates of authority granted:  May 29, 2003-May 29, 2005

Basis for approval (bilateral agreement/reciprocity):  U.S.-Guatemala
Air Transport Agreement

Except to the extent exempted/waived, this authority is subject to the
terms, conditions, and limitations indicated:

X  Foreign Air Carrier Permit (Order 90-8-58)

Special conditions/Partial grant/Denial basis/Remarks:  The authority
granted above is subject to the conditions set forth in the Notice of
Action Taken, dated November 4, 1997, in this docket, including
limitations on expanded operations by Aviateca using its own aircraft
and crews.

Action taken by:   Paul L. Gretch, Director

		      Office of International Aviation

________________________________________________________________________
________________________________________________________

Under authority assigned by the Department in its regulations, 14 CFR
Part 385, we found that (1) the applicant was qualified to perform the
proposed operations; (2)our action was consistent with Department
policy; (3) grant of the authority was consistent with the public
interest; and (4) grant of the authority would not constitute a major
regulatory action under the Energy Policy and Conservation Act of 1975.
To the extent not granted/deferred/dismissed, we denied all requests in
the referenced Docket.  We may amend, modify, or revoke the authority
granted in this Notice at any time without hearing at our discretion.

Persons entitled to petition the Department for review of the action set
forth in this Notice under the Department’s regulations, 14 CFR §
385.30, may file their petitions within seven (7) days after the date of
issuance of this Notice.  This action was effective when taken, and the
filing of a petition for review will not alter such effectiveness.

An electronic version of this document is available on the World Wide
Web at:

  HYPERLINK "http://dms.dot.gov//reports/reports_aviation.asp"
http://dms.dot.gov//reports/reports_aviation.asp

												        Appendix A

FOREIGN AIR CARRIER CONDITIONS OF AUTHORITY

In the conduct of the operations authorized, the holder shall:

(1)  Not conduct any operations unless it holds a currently effective
authorization from its homeland for such operations, and it has filed a
copy of such authorization with the Department;

(2)  Comply with all applicable requirements of the Federal Aviation
Administration, including, but not limited to, 14 CFR Parts 129, 91, and
36, and with all applicable U.S. Government requirements concerning
security;1

(3)  Comply with the requirements for minimum insurance coverage
contained in 14 CFR Part 205, and, prior to the commencement of any
operations under this authority, file evidence of such coverage, in the
form of a completed OST Form 6411, with the Federal Aviation
Administration’s Program Management Branch (AFS-260), Flight Standards
Service (any changes to, or termination of, insurance also shall be
filed with that office);

(4)  Not operate aircraft under this authority unless it complies with
operational safety requirements at least equivalent to Annex 6 of the
Chicago Convention;

(5)  Conform to the airworthiness and airman competency requirements of
its Government for international air services;

(6)  Except as specifically exempted or otherwise provided for in a
Department Order, comply with the requirements of 14 CFR Part 203,
concerning waiver of Warsaw Convention liability limits and defenses;

(7)  Agree that operations under this authority constitute a waiver of
sovereign immunity, for the purposes of 28 U.S.C. 1605(a), but only with
respect to those actions or proceedings instituted against it in any
court or other tribunal in the United States that are:

   (a)  based on its operations in international air transportation
that, according to the contract of carriage, include a point in the
United States as a point of origin, point of destination, or agreed
stopping place, or for which the contract of carriage was purchased in
the United States; or

   (b)  based on a claim under any international agreement or treaty
cognizable in any court or other tribunal of the United States.

In this condition, the term "international air transportation" means
"international transportation" as defined by the Warsaw Convention,
except that all States shall be considered to be High Contracting
Parties for the purpose of this definition;

(8)  Except as specifically authorized by the Department, originate or
terminate all flights to/from the United States in its homeland;

(9)  Comply with the requirements of 14 CFR Part 217, concerning the
reporting of scheduled, nonscheduled, and charter data;

(10) If charter operations are authorized, except as otherwise provided
in the applicable aviation agreement, comply with the Department's rules
governing charters (including 14 CFR Parts 212 and 380); and

(11) Comply with such other reasonable terms, conditions, and
limitations required by the public interest as may be prescribed by the
Department, with all applicable orders or regulations of other U.S.
agencies and courts, and with all applicable laws of the United States.

This authority shall not be effective during any period when the holder
is not in compliance with the conditions imposed above.  Moreover, this
authority cannot be sold or otherwise transferred without explicit
Department approval under Title 49 of the U.S. Code (formerly the
Federal Aviation Act of 1958, as amended).

__________________

1  To assure compliance with all applicable U.S. Government requirements
concerning security, the holder should, before commencing any new
service (including charter flights) from a foreign airport that would be
the holder’s last point of departure for the United States, inform its
Principal Security Inspector of its plans.

U.S. Department of Transportation

Office of the Secretary of Transportation									        (41301/40109)
10/2002


[Federal Register Volume 81, Number 37 (Thursday, February 25, 2016)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Pages 9343-9346]
[FR Doc No: 2016-03898]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY

40 CFR Part 52

[EPA-R08-OAR-2014-0369; FRL-9935-54-Region 8]

Approval and Promulgation of Air Quality Implementation Plans;
State of Utah; Revisions to the Utah Division of Administrative Rules,
R307-300 Series; Area Source Rules for Attainment of Fine Particulate
Matter Standards

AGENCY: Environmental Protection Agency (EPA).

ACTION: Final rule.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) is finalizing
approval and finalizing the conditional approval of portions of the
fine particulate matter (PM2.5) State Implementation Plan
(SIP) and other general rule revisions submitted by the State of Utah.
The revisions affect the Utah Division of Administrative Rules (DAR),
R307-300 Series; Requirements for Specific Locations. The revisions had
submission dates of: February 2, 2012, May 9, 2013, June 8, 2013,
February 18, 2014, April 17, 2014, May 20, 2014, July 10, 2014, August
6, 2014, and December 9, 2014. These area source rules control
emissions of direct PM2.5 and PM2.5 precursors,
sulfur dioxides (SO2), nitrogen oxides (NOX) and
volatile organic compounds (VOC). Our approval will make these rules
federally enforceable. Additionally, EPA is finalizing approval of the
State's reasonably available control measure (RACM) determinations for
the rule revisions that pertain to the PM2.5 SIP. This
action is being taken under section 110 of the Clean Air Act (CAA or
Act).

DATES: This final rule is effective on March 28, 2016.

ADDRESSES: EPA has established a docket for this action under Docket ID
No. EPA-R08-OAR-2014-0369. All documents in the docket are listed on
the www.regulations.gov Web site. Although listed in the index, some
information is not publicly available, e.g., Confidential Business
Information (CBI) or other information whose disclosure is restricted
by statute. Certain other material, such as copyrighted material, is
not placed on the Internet and will be publicly available only in hard
copy form. Publicly available docket materials are available either
electronically through www.regulations.gov or in hard copy at the Air
Program, Environmental Protection Agency (EPA), Region 8, 1595 Wynkoop
Street, Denver, Colorado 80202-1129. EPA requests that if at all
possible, you contact the individual listed in the FOR FURTHER
INFORMATION CONTACT section to view the hard copy of the docket. You
may view the hard copy of the docket Monday through Friday, 8:00 a.m.
to 4:00 p.m., excluding federal holidays.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Crystal Ostigaard, Air Program, EPA,
Region 8, Mailcode 8P-AR, 1595 Wynkoop Street, Denver, Colorado 80202-
1129,<PHONE_NUMBER><EMAIL_ADDRESS>
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

I. Background

    On October 17, 2006 (71 FR 61144), EPA strengthened the level of
the 24-hour PM2.5 National Ambient Air Quality Standards
(NAAQS), lowering the primary and secondary standards from 65
micrograms per cubic meter ([micro]g/m\3\), the 1997 standard, to 35
[micro]g/m\3\. On November 13, 2009 (74 FR 58688), EPA designated three
nonattainment areas in Utah for the 24-hour PM2.5 NAAQS of
35 [micro]g/m\3\. These are the Salt Lake City, UT; Provo, UT; and
Logan, UT-ID nonattainment areas. The State of Utah has made a number
of SIP submittals intended to address the requirements under part D of
title I of the CAA for these PM2.5 nonattainment areas.
Among those requirements are those in sections 172(c)(1) and
189(a)(1)(C) regarding reasonably available control measures (RACM) and
reasonably available control technology (RACT).
    On August 25, 2015 (80 FR 51499), EPA proposed to approve or
conditionally approve a number of RACM components in the
PM2.5 Moderate area SIP submitted by the State. Our proposed
notice and associated technical support document (TSD) give details on
EPA's interpretation of the RACM requirements under part D and our
evaluation of the State's submittals. Specifically, the RACM components
consist of area source rules found in Utah's submittals dated February
2, 2012, May 9, 2013, June 8, 2013, February 18, 2014, April 17, 2014,
May 20, 2014, July 10, 2014, August 6, 2014, and December 9, 2014.
These submittals contained various revisions to the DAR, Title R307--
Environmental Quality, set of rules, most of which are applicable to
the Utah SIP for PM2.5 nonattainment areas. The new rules or
revised rules we are addressing in this final rule were provided by
Utah in the nine different submissions listed above, and these rules
are: R307-101-2, General Requirements: Definitions; R307-303,
Commercial Cooking; R307-307, Road Salting and Sanding; R307-312,
Aggregate Processing Operations for PM2.5 Nonattainment
Areas; R307-328, Gasoline Transfer and Storage; R307-335, Degreasing
and Solvent Cleaning Operations; R307-342, Adhesives and Sealants;
R307-343 Emissions Standards for Wood Furniture Manufacturing
Operations; R307-344, Paper, Film, and Foil Coatings; R307-345, Fabric
and Vinyl Coatings; R307-346, Metal Furniture Surface Coatings; R307-
347, Large Appliance Surface Coatings; R307-348, Magnet Wire Coatings;
R307-349, Flat Wood Panel

Coatings; R307-350, Miscellaneous Metal Parts and Products Coatings;
R307-351, Graphic Arts; R307-352, Metal Container, Closure, and Coil
Coatings; R307-353, Plastic Parts Coatings; R307-354, Automotive
Refinishing Coatings; R307-355, Control of Emissions from Aerospace
Manufacture and Rework Facilities; R307-356, Appliance Pilot Light;
R307-357, Consumer Products; and R307-361, Architectural Coatings.
    A previous rule, Rule R307-340 Surface Coating Processes, was
replaced in these submittals by the specific rules for coatings listed
above. Utah correspondingly repealed R307-340. In addition, Rule R307-
342, Adhesives and Sealants, replaces an unrelated rule, R307-342
Qualifications of Contractors and Test Procedures for Vapor Recovery
Systems for Gasoline Delivery Tanks. The removal of the previous
version of R307-342 is addressed by the State's February 2, 2012
submittal, which repeals R307-342 and amends R307-328, Gasoline
Transfer and Storage, to account for the repeal of R307-342.
    These rule submissions, except for revisions to R307-101-2, R307-
103, and R307-328, and the repeal of R307-342, were requested for
approval as RACM components of the PM2.5 SIP submitted by
the State of Utah. Two of the non-RACM rule revisions do not pertain at
all to the Utah PM2.5 SIPs: revisions to R307-328 and the
repeal of R307-342. At the request of the State, EPA is not finalizing
our proposed approval of a third non-RACM rule; R307-103,
Administrative Procedures.
    For details of our evaluation of these rules, see the proposed
notice and associated TSD.

II. Response to Comments

    EPA did not receive any comments on our proposed action.

III. Final Action

    For the reasons stated in our proposed notice and associated TSD,
EPA is finalizing approval of revisions to Administrative Rule R307-
101-2, along with the additions/revisions/repeals in R307-300 Series;
Requirements for Specific Locations (Within Nonattainment and
Maintenance Areas), R307-303, R307-307, R307-335, R307-340 (repealed),
R307-342 (repealed and replaced), R307-343, R307-344, R307-345, R307-
346, R307-347, R307-348, R307-349, R307-350, R307-351, R307-352, R307-
353, R307-354, R307-355, R307-356, R307-357, and R307-361 for
incorporation into the Utah SIP as submitted by the State of Utah on
May 9, 2013, June 8, 2013, February 18, 2014, April 17, 2014, May 20,
2014, July 10, 2014, August 6, 2014, and December 9, 2014. We are also
finalizing approval of Utah's determination that the above rules in
R307-300 Series; Requirements for Specific Locations (Within
Nonattainment and Maintenance Areas) constitute RACM for the Utah
PM2.5 SIP for the specific source categories addressed;
however, we are not acting to determine that Utah's PM2.5
attainment plan has met all requirements regarding RACM under subparts
1 and 4 of Part D, title I of the Act. We intend to act separately on
the remainder of Utah's PM2.5 attainment plan.
    EPA is finalizing the conditional approval of revisions for R307-
312 found in the May 9, 2013 submittal and for R307-328 found in the
February 2, 2012 submittal. Additionally, EPA is finalizing the
conditional approval of Utah's determination that R307-312 constitutes
RACM for the Utah PM2.5 SIP for aggregate processing
operations. As stated above, we are not determining, however, that
Utah's PM2.5 attainment plan has met all requirements
regarding RACM under subparts 1 and 4 of Part D, title I of the Act.
Under section 110(k)(4) of the Act, EPA may approve a SIP revision
based on a commitment by the State to adopt specific enforceable
measures by a date certain, but not later than one year after the date
of approval of the plan revision. On August 4, 2015, Utah submitted a
commitment letter to adopt and submit specific revisions within one
year of our final action on these submittals; specifically to remove
the phrase ``or equivalent method'' in one rule and to specify three
equivalent methods in the other rule. Since we are finalizing our
conditional approval, Utah must adopt and submit the specific revisions
it has committed to within one year of our finalization. If Utah does
not submit these revisions within one year, or if we find Utah's
revisions to be incomplete, or we disapprove Utah's revisions, this
conditional approval will convert to a disapproval. If any of these
occur and our conditional approvals convert to a disapproval, that will
constitute a disapproval of a required plan element under part D of
title I of the Act, which starts an 18-month clock for sanctions, see
CAA section 179(a)(2), and the two-year clock for a federal
implementation plan (FIP) to address the disapproved plan element, see
CAA section 110(c)(1)(B).
    EPA is not finalizing our proposed approval of R307-103,
Administrative Procedures. The State informed us that they did not
intend for R307-103 to be submitted for incorporation into the SIP. As
the administrative procedures in R307-103 are unrelated to
PM2.5 attainment plan requirements, this does not affect the
remainder of our action. With the exception of provisions to meet the
requirements of section 128 of the Act, which Utah plans to address
separately, these administrative procedures are not required to be
incorporated into the SIP.
    Finally, EPA is finalizing approval of the repeal of R307-342,
Qualification of Contractors and Test Procedures for Vapor Recovery
Systems for Gasoline Delivery Tanks, submitted by DAQ on February 2,
2012.

IV. Incorporation by Reference

    In this rule, EPA is finalizing regulatory text that includes
incorporation by reference. In accordance with requirements of 1 CFR
51.5, EPA is finalizing the incorporation by reference of the Utah
Department of Air Quality rules promulgated in the DAR, R307-300 Series
as discussed in section III, Final Action, of this preamble. EPA has
made, and will continue to make, these documents generally available
electronically through www.regulations.gov and/or in hard copy at the
appropriate EPA office (see the ADDRESSES section of this preamble for
more information).

V. Statutory and Executive Order Reviews

    Under the Clean Air Act, the Administrator is required to approve a
SIP submission that complies with the provisions of the Act and
applicable federal regulations. 42 U.S.C. 7410(k); 40 CFR 52.02(a).
Thus, in reviewing SIP submissions, EPA's role is to approve state
choices, provided that they meet the criteria of the Clean Air Act.
Accordingly, this action merely approves of state law as meeting
federal requirements and does not impose additional requirements beyond
those imposed by state law. For that reason, this final action:
     Is not a significant regulatory action subject to review
by the Office of Management and Budget under Executive Orders 12866 (58
FR 51735, October 4, 1993) and 13563 (76 FR 3821, January 21, 2011);
     does not impose an information collection burden under the
provisions of the Paperwork Reduction Act (44 U.S.C. 3501 et seq.);
     is certified as not having a significant economic impact
on a substantial number of small entities under the Regulatory
Flexibility Act (5 U.S.C. 601 et seq.);
     does not contain any unfunded mandate or significantly or
uniquely affect small governments, as described

in the Unfunded Mandates Reform Act of 1995 (Pub. L. 104-4);
     does not have federalism implications as specified in
Executive Order 13132 (64 FR 43255, August 10, 1999);
     is not an economically significant regulatory action based
on health or safety risks subject to Executive Order 13045 (62 FR
19885, April 23, 1997);
     is not a significant regulatory action subject to
Executive Order 13211 (66 FR 28355, May 22, 2001);
     is not subject to requirements of Section 12(d) of the
National Technology Transfer and Advancement Act of 1995 (15 U.S.C. 272
note) because application of those requirements would be inconsistent
with the Clean Air Act; and
     does not provide EPA with the discretionary authority to
address, as appropriate, disproportionate human health or environmental
effects, using practicable and legally permissible methods, under
Executive Order 12898 (59 FR 7629, February 16, 1994).
    In addition, the SIP is not approved to apply on any Indian
reservation land or in any other area where EPA or an Indian tribe has
demonstrated that a tribe has jurisdiction. In those areas of Indian
country, the rule does not have tribal implications and will not impose
substantial direct costs on tribal governments or preempt tribal law as
specified by Executive Order 13175 (65 FR 67249, November 9, 2000).
    The Congressional Review Act, 5 U.S.C. 801 et seq., as added by the
Small Business Regulatory Enforcement Fairness Act of 1996, generally
provides that before a rule may take effect, the agency promulgating
the rule must submit a rule report, which includes a copy of the rule,
to each House of the Congress and to the Comptroller General of the
United States. EPA will submit a report containing this action and
other required information to the U.S. Senate, the U.S. House of
Representatives, and the Comptroller General of the United States prior
to publication of the rule in the Federal Register. A major rule cannot
take effect until 60 days after it is published in the Federal
Register. This action is not a ``major rule'' as defined by 5 U.S.C.
804(2).
    Under section 307(b)(1) of the Clean Air Act, petitions for
judicial review of this action must be filed in the United States Court
of Appeals for the appropriate circuit by April 25, 2016. Filing a
petition for reconsideration by the Administrator of this final rule
does not affect the finality of this action for the purposes of
judicial review nor does it extend the time within which a petition for
judicial review may be filed, and shall not postpone the effectiveness
of such rule or action. This action may not be challenged later in
proceedings to enforce its requirements. (See section 307(b)(2).)

List of Subjects in 40 CFR Part 52

    Environmental protection, Air pollution control, Carbon monoxide,
Incorporation by reference, Intergovernmental relations, Lead, Nitrogen
dioxide, Ozone, Particulate matter, Reporting and recordkeeping
requirements, Sulfur oxides, Volatile organization compounds.

    Authority:  42 U.S.C. 7401 et seq.

    Dated: September 28, 2015.
Shaun L. McGrath,
Regional Administrator, Region 8.

    Editorial note:  This document was received for publication by
the Office of the Federal Register on February 19, 2016.

    40 CFR part 52 is amended to read as follows:

PART 52--APPROVAL AND PROMULGATION OF IMPLEMENTATION PLANS

0
1. The authority citation for part 52 continues to read as follows:

    Authority:  42 U.S.C. 7401 et seq.

Subpart TT--Utah

0
2. Section 52.2320 is amended by adding paragraph (c)(83) to read as
follows:

Sec.  52.2320  Identification of plan.

* * * * *
    (c) * * *
    (83) On February 2, 2012, May 9, 2013, June 8, 2013, February 18,
2014, April 17, 2014, May 20, 2014, July 10, 2014, August 6, 2014, and
December 9, 2014, the Governor submitted revisions to the Utah State
Implementation Plan (SIP) rules. The EPA is approving the repeal of
R307-340 and R307-342. The EPA is approving the submitted revisions and
associated nonsubstantive changes to the following rules: R307-307,
R307-351-2, R307-351-4, and R307-355-5. The EPA is conditionally
approving the submitted revisions to the following rules: R307-101
(including nonsubstantive changes to R307-101-2), R307-312-5(2)(a), and
R307-328-4(6). The EPA is approving the submitted revisions to the
following rules: R307-303, R307-307, R307-312 (except R307-312-5(2)(a)
which is conditionally approved), R307-328 (except R307-328-4(6) which
is conditionally approved), R307-335, R307-342, R307-343, R307-344,
R307-345, R307-346, R307-347, R307-348, R307-349, R307-350, R307-351
(except R307-351-2 which is approved with nonsubstantive changes),
R307-352, R307-353, R307-354, R307-355 (except R307-355-5 which is
approved with nonsubstantive changes), R307-356, R307-357, R307-357-4,
and R307-361.
    (i) Incorporation by reference.
    (A) Title R307 of the Utah Administrative Code, Environmental
Quality, Air Quality, R307-101, General Requirements, R307-101-2,
Definitions; effective February 1, 2013, as proposed in the Utah State
Bulletin on October 1, 2012, and published as effective in the Utah
State Bulletin on February 15, 2013.
    (B) Title R307 of the Utah Administrative Code, Environmental
Quality, Air Quality, R307-303, Commercial Cooking; effective April 10,
2013, as proposed in the Utah State Bulletin on August 1, 2012,
December 1, 2012 and March 1, 2013 and published as effective in the
Utah State Bulletin on May 1, 2013.
    (C) Title R307 of the Utah Administrative Code, Environmental
Quality, Air Quality, R307-328, Gasoline Transfer and Storage;
effective June 7, 2011, as proposed in the Utah State Bulletin on
February 1, 2011 and May 1, 2011, and published as effective in the
Utah State Bulletin on June 15, 2011.
    (D) Title R307 of the Utah Administrative Code, Environmental
Quality, Air Quality, R307-335, Degreasing and Solvent Cleaning
Operations; effective January 1, 2013, as proposed in the Utah State
Bulletin on August 1, 2012 and December 1, 2012, and published as
effective in the Utah State Bulletin on January 15, 2013.
    (E)(1) Title R307 of the Utah Administrative Code, Environmental
Quality, Air Quality, R307-342, Adhesives and Sealants; effective
August 1, 2013, as proposed in the Utah State Bulletin on March 1, 2013
and July 1, 2013, and published as effective in the Utah State Bulletin
on August 15, 2013.
    (2) Title R307 of the Utah Administrative Code, Environmental
Quality, Air Quality, R307-357, Consumer Products (except R307-357-4,
Standards); effective August 1, 2013, as proposed in the Utah State
Bulletin on March 1, 2013 and July 1, 2013, and published as effective
in the Utah State Bulletin on August 15, 2013.
    (F)(1) Title R307 of the Utah Administrative Code, Environmental
Quality, Air Quality, R307-343, Emissions Standards for Wood Furniture
Manufacturing Operations; effective May 1, 2013, as proposed in the
Utah State Bulletin on October 1,

2012, January 1, 2013 and April 1, 2013, and published as effective in
the Utah State Bulletin on May 15, 2013.
    (2) Title R307 of the Utah Administrative Code, Environmental
Quality, Air Quality, R307-353, Plastic Parts Coatings; effective May
1, 2013, as proposed in the Utah State Bulletin on October 1, 2012,
January 1, 2013 and April 1, 2013, and published as effective in the
Utah State Bulletin on May 15, 2013.
    (G)(1) Title R307 of the Utah Administrative Code, Environmental
Quality, Air Quality, R307-312, Aggregate Processing Operations for
PM2.5 Nonattainment Areas; effective February 1, 2013, as
proposed in the Utah State Bulletin on October 1, 2012 and January 1,
2013, and published as effective in the Utah State Bulletin on February
15, 2013.
    (2) Title R307 of the Utah Administrative Code, Environmental
Quality, Air Quality, R307-344, Paper, Film and Foil Coatings;
effective February 1, 2013, as proposed in the Utah State Bulletin on
October 1, 2012 and January 1, 2013, and published as effective in the
Utah State Bulletin on February 15, 2013.
    (3) Title R307 of the Utah Administrative Code, Environmental
Quality, Air Quality, R307-345, Fabric and Vinyl Coatings; effective
February 1, 2013, as proposed in the Utah State Bulletin on October 1,
2012 and January 1, 2013, and published as effective in the Utah State
Bulletin on February 15, 2013.
    (4) Title R307 of the Utah Administrative Code, Environmental
Quality, Air Quality, R307-346, Metal Furniture Surface Coatings;
effective February 1, 2013, as proposed in the Utah State Bulletin on
October 1, 2012 and January 1, 2013, and published as effective in the
Utah State Bulletin on February 15, 2013.
    (5) Title R307 of the Utah Administrative Code, Environmental
Quality, Air Quality, R307-347, Large Appliance Surface Coatings;
effective February 1, 2013, as proposed in the Utah State Bulletin on
October 1, 2012 and January 1, 2013, and published as effective in the
Utah State Bulletin on February 15, 2013.
    (6) Title R307 of the Utah Administrative Code, Environmental
Quality, Air Quality, R307-348, Magnet Wire Coatings; effective
February 1, 2013, as proposed in the Utah State Bulletin on October 1,
2012 and January 1, 2013, and published as effective in the Utah State
Bulletin on February 15, 2013.
    (7) Title R307 of the Utah Administrative Code, Environmental
Quality, Air Quality, R307-349, Flat Wood Panel Coatings; effective
February 1, 2013, as proposed in the Utah State Bulletin on October 1,
2012 and January 1, 2013, and published as effective in the Utah State
Bulletin on February 15, 2013.
    (8) Title R307 of the Utah Administrative Code, Environmental
Quality, Air Quality, R307-352, Metal Container, Closure and Coil
Coatings; effective February 1, 2013, as proposed in the Utah State
Bulletin on October 1, 2012 and January 1, 2013, and published as
effective in the Utah State Bulletin on February 15, 2013.
    (9) Title R307 of the Utah Administrative Code, Environmental
Quality, Air Quality, R307-354, Automotive Refinishing Coatings;
effective February 1, 2013, as proposed in the Utah State Bulletin on
October 1, 2012 and January 1, 2013, and published as effective in the
Utah State Bulletin on February 15, 2013.
    (H) Title R307 of the Utah Administrative Code, Environmental
Quality, Air Quality, R307-350, Miscellaneous Metal Parts and Products
Coatings; effective December 3, 2013, as proposed in the Utah State
Bulletin on August 1, 2013 and November 1, 2013, and published as
effective in the Utah State Bulletin on January 1, 2014.
    (I) Title R307 of the Utah Administrative Code, Environmental
Quality, Air Quality, R307-356, Appliance Pilot Light; effective
January 1, 2013, as proposed in the Utah State Bulletin on August 15,
2012, and December 1, 2012, and published as effective in the Utah
State Bulletin on January 15, 2013.
    (J) Title R307 of the Utah Administrative Code, Environmental
Quality, Air Quality, R307-357, Consumer Products, R307-357-4, Consumer
Products, Standards; effective May 8, 2014, as proposed in the Utah
State Bulletin on April 1, 2014, and published as effective in the Utah
State Bulletin on June 1, 2014.
    (K) Title R307 of the Utah Administrative Code, Environmental
Quality, Air Quality, R307-361, Architectural Coatings; effective
October 31, 2013, as proposed in the Utah State Bulletin on July 1,
2013 and October 1, 2013, and published as effective in the Utah State
Bulletin on November 15, 2013.
    (L) Title R307 of the Utah Administrative Code, Environmental
Quality, Air Quality, R307-307, Road Salting and Sanding; effective
February 1, 2013, as proposed in the Utah State Bulletin on October 1,
2012 and January 1, 2013, and published as effective in the Utah State
Bulletin on February 15, 2013.
    (M) Title R307 of the Utah Administrative Code, Environmental
Quality, Air Quality, R307-351, Graphic Arts; effective February 1,
2013, as proposed in the Utah State Bulletin on October 1, 2012 and
January 1, 2013, and published as effective in the Utah State Bulletin
on February 15, 2013.
    (N) Title R307 of the Utah Administrative Code, Environmental
Quality, Air Quality, R307-355, Control of Emissions from Aerospace
Manufacture and Rework Facilities; effective February 1, 2013, as
proposed in the Utah State Bulletin on October 1, 2012 and January 1,
2013, and published as effective in the Utah State Bulletin on February
15, 2013.

[FR Doc. 2016-03898 Filed 2-24-16; 8:45 am]
 BILLING CODE 6560-50-P