[Federal Register Volume 86, Number 71 (Thursday, April 15, 2021)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Pages 19784-19786]
[FR Doc No: 2021-07753]

=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY

Coast Guard

33 CFR Part 165

[Docket Number USCG-2021-0195]
RIN 1625-AA00

Safety Zone; San Diego Bay, San Diego, CA

AGENCY: Coast Guard, DHS.

ACTION: Temporary final rule.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Coast Guard is establishing a temporary safety zone for
all navigable waters within a 100-yard radius of the USS BONHOMME
RICHARD while being towed through San Diego Bay, San Diego, CA. The
safety zone is needed to protect personnel, vessels, and the marine
environment from potential hazards associated with the dead ship tow of
the USS BONHOMME RICHARD as it is transiting from Pier 2 Naval Base San
Diego to the San Diego Bay Channel Entrance. Entry of vessels or
persons into this zone is prohibited unless specifically authorized by
the Captain of the Port San Diego.

DATES: This rule is effective from 6 a.m. until 7:30 p.m. on April 15,
2021.

ADDRESSES: To view documents mentioned in this preamble as being
available in the docket, go to https://www.regulations.gov, type USCG-
2021-0195 in the ``SEARCH'' box and click ``SEARCH.'' Click on Open
Docket Folder on the line associated with this rule.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: If you have questions on this rule,
call or email Lieutenant John Santorum, Waterways Management, U.S.
Coast Guard Sector San Diego, CA; telephone<PHONE_NUMBER>, email
<EMAIL_ADDRESS>
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

I. Table of Abbreviations

CFR Code of Federal Regulations
DHS Department of Homeland Security
FR Federal Register
NPRM Notice of proposed rulemaking
Sec.  Section
U.S.C. United States Code

II. Background Information and Regulatory History

    The Coast Guard is issuing this temporary rule without prior notice
and opportunity to comment pursuant to authority under section 4(a) of
the Administrative Procedure Act (APA) (5 U.S.C. 553(b)). This
provision authorizes an agency to issue a rule

without prior notice and opportunity to comment when the agency for
good cause finds that those procedures are ``impracticable,
unnecessary, or contrary to the public interest.'' Under 5 U.S.C.
553(b)(B), the Coast Guard finds that good cause exists for not
publishing a notice of proposed rulemaking (NPRM) with respect to this
rule because it is impracticable. This safety zone is required to
protect the maritime public and the surrounding waterways from hazards
associated with the dead ship tow of the USS BONHOMME RICHARD. It is
impracticable to publish an NPRM because the Coast Guard must establish
this safety zone by April 15, 2021. The Coast Guard lacks sufficient
time to provide a reasonable comment period and then consider those
comments before issuing the rule.
    Under 5 U.S.C. 553(d)(3), the Coast Guard finds that good cause
exists for making this rule effective less than 30 days after
publication in the Federal Register. Delaying the effective date of
this rule would be impracticable because this rule is needed to protect
mariners, commercial and recreational waterway users, and marine
environment from dangers associated with the dead ship tow of the USS
BONHOMME RICHARD on April 15, 2021.

III. Legal Authority and Need for Rule

    The Coast Guard is issuing this rule under authority in 46 U.S.C.
70034 (previously 33 U.S.C. 1231). The Captain of the Port San Diego
(COTP) has determined that potential hazards associated with the dead
ship tow of the USS BONHOMME RICHARD on April 15, 2021, will be a
safety concern for anyone in the vicinity of the USS BONHOMME RICHARD
and tugs. Fuel on the USS BONHOMME RICHARD will remain on board during
the transit. Due to the increased public awareness associated with the
USS BONHOMME RICHARD, a potential for media presence and an increase of
recreational vessel traffic presents a significant hazard to the
operation. This rule is needed to protect personnel, vessels, and the
marine environment in the navigable waters within the safety zone while
the USS BONHOMME RICHARD is being towed from Pier 2 Naval Base San
Diego to the San Diego Bay Channel Entrance.

IV. Discussion of the Rule

    This rule establishes a safety zone from 6 a.m. until 7:30 p.m. on
April 15, 2021. The safety zone will cover all navigable waters within
a 100-yard radius of the USS BONHOMME RICHARD while being towed through
San Diego Bay, San Diego, CA. The duration of the zone is intended to
protect personnel, vessels, and the marine environment in these
navigable waters while the USS BONHOMME RICHARD is being dead ship
towed from Pier 2 Naval Base San Diego to the San Diego Bay Channel
Entrance. No vessel or person will be permitted to enter the safety
zone without obtaining permission from the COTP or a designated
representative.

V. Regulatory Analyses

    We developed this rule after considering numerous statutes and
Executive orders related to rulemaking. Below we summarize our analyses
based on a number of these statutes and Executive orders, and we
discuss First Amendment rights of protestors.

A. Regulatory Planning and Review

    Executive Orders 12866 and 13563 direct agencies to assess the
costs and benefits of available regulatory alternatives and, if
regulation is necessary, to select regulatory approaches that maximize
net benefits. This rule has not been designated a ``significant
regulatory action,'' under Executive Order 12866. Accordingly, this
rule has not been reviewed by the Office of Management and Budget
(OMB).
    This regulatory action determination is based on the size,
location, and limited duration of the safety zone. This safety zone
impacts a small area of the San Diego Bay for a limited period as the
USS BONHOMME RICHARD transits the bay and on a day when vessel traffic
is normally low. Furthermore, vessel traffic can safely transit around
the safety zone.

B. Impact on Small Entities

    The Regulatory Flexibility Act of 1980, 5 U.S.C. 601-612, as
amended, requires Federal agencies to consider the potential impact of
regulations on small entities during rulemaking. The term ``small
entities'' comprises small businesses, not-for-profit organizations
that are independently owned and operated and are not dominant in their
fields, and governmental jurisdictions with populations of less than
50,000. The Coast Guard certifies under 5 U.S.C. 605(b) that this rule
will not have a significant economic impact on a substantial number of
small entities.
    While some owners or operators of vessels intending to transit the
safety zone may be small entities, for the reasons stated in section
V.A above, this rule will not have a significant economic impact on any
vessel owner or operator.
    Under section 213(a) of the Small Business Regulatory Enforcement
Fairness Act of 1996 (Pub. L. 104-121), we want to assist small
entities in understanding this rule. If the rule would affect your
small business, organization, or governmental jurisdiction and you have
questions concerning its provisions or options for compliance, please
call or email the person listed in the FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT
section.
    Small businesses may send comments on the actions of Federal
employees who enforce, or otherwise determine compliance with, Federal
regulations to the Small Business and Agriculture Regulatory
Enforcement Ombudsman and the Regional Small Business Regulatory
Fairness Boards. The Ombudsman evaluates these actions annually and
rates each agency's responsiveness to small business. If you wish to
comment on actions by employees of the Coast Guard, call 1-888-REG-FAIR
(1-888-734-3247). The Coast Guard will not retaliate against small
entities that question or complain about this rule or any policy or
action of the Coast Guard.

C. Collection of Information

    This rule will not call for a new collection of information under
the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 (44 U.S.C. 3501-3520).

D. Federalism and Indian Tribal Governments

    A rule has implications for federalism under Executive Order 13132,
Federalism, if it has a substantial direct effect on the States, on the
relationship between the National Government and the States, or on the
distribution of power and responsibilities among the various levels of
government. We have analyzed this rule under that Order and have
determined that it is consistent with the fundamental federalism
principles and preemption requirements described in Executive Order
13132.
    Also, this rule does not have tribal implications under Executive
Order 13175, Consultation and Coordination with Indian Tribal
Governments, because it does not have a substantial direct effect on
one or more Indian tribes, on the relationship between the Federal
Government and Indian tribes, or on the distribution of power and
responsibilities between the Federal Government and Indian tribes.

E. Unfunded Mandates Reform Act

    The Unfunded Mandates Reform Act of 1995 (2 U.S.C. 1531-1538)
requires Federal agencies to assess the effects of their discretionary
regulatory actions. In

particular, the Act addresses actions that may result in the
expenditure by a State, local, or tribal government, in the aggregate,
or by the private sector of $100,000,000 (adjusted for inflation) or
more in any one year. Though this rule will not result in such an
expenditure, we do discuss the effects of this rule elsewhere in this
preamble.

F. Environment

    We have analyzed this rule under Department of Homeland Security
Directive 023-01, Rev. 1, associated implementing instructions, and
Environmental Planning COMDTINST 5090.1 (series), which guide the Coast
Guard in complying with the National Environmental Policy Act of
1969(42 U.S.C. 4321-4370f), and have determined that this action is one
of a category of actions that do not individually or cumulatively have
a significant effect on the human environment. This rule involves a
moving safety zone that will prohibit entry within a 100-yard radius of
the USS BONHOMME RICHARD while being towed from Pier 2 Naval Base San
Diego to the San Diego Bay Channel Entrance. It is categorically
excluded from further review under paragraph L60(a) of Appendix A,
Table 1 of DHS Instruction Manual 023-01-001-01, Rev. 1. A Record of
Environmental Consideration supporting this determination is available
in the docket. For instructions on locating the docket, see the
ADDRESSES section of this preamble.

G. Protest Activities

    The Coast Guard respects the First Amendment rights of protesters.
Protesters are asked to call or email the person listed in the FOR
FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT section to coordinate protest activities so
that your message can be received without jeopardizing the safety or
security of people, places or vessels.

List of Subjects in 33 CFR Part 165

    Harbors, Marine safety, Navigation (water), Reporting and
recordkeeping requirements, Security measures, Waterways.

    For the reasons discussed in the preamble, the Coast Guard amends
33 CFR part 165 as follows:

PART 165--REGULATED NAVIGATION AREAS AND LIMITED ACCESS AREAS

0
1. The authority citation for part 165 continues to read as follows:

    Authority:  46 U.S.C. 70034, 70051; 33 CFR 1.05-1, 6.04-1, 6.04-
6, and 160.5; Department of Homeland Security Delegation No. 0170.1.

0
2. Add Sec.  165.T11-053 to read as follows:

Sec.  165.T11-053   Safety Zone; San Diego Bay, San Diego, CA.

    (a) Location. The following area is a safety zone. All waters of
San Diego Bay, from surface to bottom within a 100-yard radius of the
USS BONHOMME RICHARD while transiting from Pier 2 Naval Base San Diego
to the San Diego Bay Channel Entrance.
    (b) Definitions. As used in this section, designated representative
means a Coast Guard Patrol Commander, including a Coast Guard coxswain,
petty officer, or other officer operating a Coast Guard vessel and a
Federal, State, and local officer designated by or assisting the
Captain of the Port San Diego (COTP) in the enforcement of the safety
zone.
    (c) Regulations. (1) Under the general safety zone regulations in
subpart C of this part, you may not enter the safety zone described in
paragraph (a) of this section unless authorized by the COTP or the
COTP's designated representative.
    (2) To seek permission to enter, contact the COTP or the COTP's
representative by VHF Channel 16. Those in the safety zone must comply
with all lawful orders or directions given to them by the COTP or the
COTP's designated representative.
    (d) Enforcement period. This section will be enforced from 6 a.m.
to 7:30 p.m. on April 15, 2021.

    Dated: April 1, 2021.
T.J. Barelli,
Captain, U.S. Coast Guard, Captain of the Port Sector San Diego.
[FR Doc. 2021-07753 Filed 4-14-21; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 9110-04-P


[Federal Register: June 12, 2008 (Volume 73, Number 114)]
[Notices]
[Page 33428]
[DOCID:fr12jn08-61]

=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission

Combined Notice of Filings 1

June 6, 2008.
    Take notice that the Commission has received the following Natural
Gas Pipeline Rate and Refund Report filings:

    Docket Numbers: RP99-301-209.
    Applicants: ANR Pipeline Company.
    Description: ANR Pipeline Company submits an amendment to Rate
Schedule FTS-1 negotiated rate agreement with Merrill Lynch
Commodities, Inc. (Contract No. 113450), to be effective 6/4/08.
    Filed Date: 06/04/2008.
    Accession Number: 20080606-0010.
    Comment Date: 5 p.m. Eastern Time on Monday, June 16, 2008.

    Docket Numbers: RP08-398-000.
    Applicants: East Tennessee Natural Gas, LLC.
    Description: East Tennessee Natural Gas, LLC submits Fourth Revised
Sheet 105 et al. to FERC Gas Tariff, Third Revised Volume 1, effective
7/5/08.
    Filed Date: 06/04/2008.
    Accession Number: 20080606-0009.
    Comment Date: 5 p.m. Eastern Time on Monday, June 16, 2008.

    Docket Numbers: RP08-399-000.
    Applicants: Texas Eastern Transmission LP.
    Description: Texas Eastern Transmission, LP submits Seventh Revised
Sheet 211 et al. to FERC Gas Tariff Seventh Revised Volume 1, to be
effective 7/5/08.
    Filed Date: 06/04/2008.
    Accession Number: 20080606-0008.
    Comment Date: 5 p.m. Eastern Time on Monday, June 16, 2008.

    Docket Numbers: RP08-400-000.
    Applicants: Maritimes & Northeast Pipeline, L.L.C.
    Description: Maritimes & Northeast Pipeline, LLC submits Second
Revised Sheet 152 et al. to FERC Gas Tariff, First Revised Volume 1, to
be effective 7/5/08.
    Filed Date: 06/04/2008.
    Accession Number: 20080606-0007.
    Comment Date: 5 p.m. Eastern Time on Monday, June 16, 2008.

    Docket Numbers: RP08-401-000.
    Applicants: Columbia Gas Transmission Corporation.
    Description: Columbia Gas Transmission Corporation submits Eleventh
Revised Sheet 501 et al. to FERC Gas Tariff, Second Revised Volume 1,
to be effective 7/5/08.
    Filed Date: 06/05/2008.
    Accession Number: 20080605-0056.
    Comment Date: 5 p.m. Eastern Time on Tuesday.

    Any person desiring to intervene or to protest in any of the above
proceedings must file in accordance with Rules 211 and 214 of the
Commission's Rules of Practice and Procedure (18 CFR 385.211 and
385.214) on or before 5 p.m. Eastern time on the specified comment
date. It is not necessary to separately intervene again in a subdocket
related to a compliance filing if you have previously intervened in the
same docket. Protests will be considered by the Commission in
determining the appropriate action to be taken, but will not serve to
make protestants parties to the proceeding. Anyone filing a motion to
intervene or protest must serve a copy of that document on the
Applicant. In reference to filings initiating a new proceeding,
interventions or protests submitted on or before the comment deadline
need not be served on persons other than the Applicant.
    The Commission encourages electronic submission of protests and
interventions in lieu of paper, using the FERC Online links at http://
www.ferc.gov. To facilitate electronic service, persons with Internet
access who will eFile a document and/or be listed as a contact for an
intervenor must create and validate an eRegistration account using the
eRegistration link. Select the eFiling link to log on and submit the
intervention or protests.
    Persons unable to file electronically should submit an original and
14 copies of the intervention or protest to the Federal Energy
Regulatory Commission, 888 First St., NE., Washington, DC 20426.
    The filings in the above proceedings are accessible in the
Commission's eLibrary system by clicking on the appropriate link in the
above list. They are also available for review in the Commission's
Public Reference Room in Washington, DC. There is an eSubscription link
on the Web site that enables subscribers to receive e-mail notification
when a document is added to a subscribed dockets(s). For assistance
with any FERC Online service, please e-mail<EMAIL_ADDRESS>
or call<PHONE_NUMBER> (toll free). For TTY, call<PHONE_NUMBER>.

Nathaniel J. Davis, Sr.,
Deputy Secretary.
[FR Doc. E8-13302 Filed 6-11-08; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 6717-01-P


[Federal Register Volume 77, Number 132 (Tuesday, July 10, 2012)]
[Notices]
[Pages 40683-40684]
[FR Doc No: 2012-16767]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

[Release No. 34-67345; File No. SR-NYSE-2012-20]

Self-Regulatory Organizations; New York Stock Exchange LLC;
Notice of Filing and Immediate Effectiveness of Proposed Rule Change
Amending Certain Exchange Rules Related to Floor Official Duties and
Responsibilities in the Exchange's Marketplace

July 3, 2012.
    Pursuant to Section 19(b)(1) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934
(the ``Act'') \1\ and Rule 19b-4 thereunder,\2\ notice is hereby given
that on June 21, 2012, New York Stock Exchange LLC (``NYSE'' or
``Exchange'') filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission
(``Commission'') the proposed rule change as described in Items I and
II below, which Items have been prepared by the self-regulatory
organization. The Commission is publishing this notice to solicit
comments on the proposed rule change from interested persons.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \1\ 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(1).
    \2\ 17 CFR 240.19b-4.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

I. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement of the Terms of Substance
of the Proposed Rule Change

    The Exchange proposes to amend certain Exchange Rules related to
Floor Official duties and responsibilities in the Exchange's
marketplace. The text of the proposed rule change is available on the
Exchange's Web site at www.nyse.com, at the principal office of the
Exchange, and at the Commission's Public Reference Room.

II. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement of the Purpose of, and
Statutory Basis for, the Proposed Rule Change

    In its filing with the Commission, the self-regulatory organization
included statements concerning the purpose of, and basis for, the
proposed rule change and discussed any comments it received on the
proposed rule change. The text of those statements may be examined at
the places specified in Item IV below. The Exchange has prepared
summaries, set forth in sections A, B, and C below, of the most
significant parts of such statements.

A. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement of the Purpose of, and
Statutory Basis for, the Proposed Rule Change

1. Purpose
    The Exchange proposes to amend certain Exchange Rules pertaining to
the duties and responsibilities of Floor Officials in the Exchange
marketplace.
    The role of the Floor Official evolved out of the self-regulatory
scheme of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the
``Act'').\3\ A number of Exchange Rules specify involvement in the
marketplace by Floor Officials, senior-level Floor Officials (i.e.,
Floor Governors, Executive Floor Officials, Senior Floor Officials and
Executive Floor Governors), or both.\4\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \3\ 15 U.S.C. 78f.
    \4\ See Exchange Rules 46 and 46A (defining Floor Official,
Floor Governor, Executive Floor Official, Senior Floor Official and
Executive Floor Governors).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    Typically, the Floor Official's role on the Floor of the Exchange
involves the consideration of requests to execute a particular kind of
transaction or the supervision of specified trading situations. In
addition to their formal role prescribed by the Exchange rules, Floor
Officials also provide a more general level of oversight to the
marketplace on a day-to-day basis.
    Given the evolution of the equities markets away from manual
executions and manual enforcement of rules toward an electronic market
that automates executions and in many cases hard codes the rule
requirements into the execution logic, many of the trading procedures
and situations originally requiring Floor Officials involvement have
been automated; in other cases, the Floor Official approval has become
pro forma rather than substantive. In light of this, the Exchange
determined that several Exchange Rules should be amended with respect
to the duties and responsibilities once assigned to Floor Officials to
better comport with today's Exchange market structure.
Proposed Amendments
    NYSE Rule 122 provides that, to avoid unfair allocation of
securities traded, no member or member organization shall maintain with
more than one broker on the Exchange market orders or orders at the
same price for the purchase or sale of the same security for the
account of the same principal unless permission has been obtained from
a Floor Official. The Exchange proposes to amend the rule to remove
this approval as a Floor Official function and therefore ban this
practice outright.
    NYSE Rule 123D addresses openings and halts in trading. The
Exchange seeks to make a technical amendment to this rule to remove any
reference to ``Floor Official Approval Form 3,'' as this form
no longer exists and the information it captured is now maintained in
the Floor Official Request Tracking Engine (``FORT[Eacute]'').
    Finally, the Exchange proposes amending Rule 128B, which prescribes
the procedures for the publication of changes, cancellations or other
errors on the consolidated tape (the ``Tape''). Specifically, Rule
128B.10 requires Floor Official approval to change or correct a
transaction that previously appeared on the Tape, cancel a transaction
that previously appeared on the Tape and that has been agreed to by all
buyers and sellers, and publish a transaction omitted from the Tape
(i.e., a sold or sold last sale). In addition, Rule 128B.13 requires
Floor Official approval for the publication of a correction to a
transaction erroneously reported to ``a reporter'' by a party to the
transaction. In the interests of maintaining the integrity of the Tape,
the Exchange proposes to elevate the level of approval required under
Rules 128B.10 and .13 from Floor Official to senior-level Floor
Official (i.e., Floor Governors, Executive Floor Officials, Senior
Floor Officials and Executive Floor Governors). In addition, the
Exchange proposes to delete ``to a reporter'' in Rule 128B.13.
Historically, Floor reporters were Exchange employees responsible for
collecting and inputting transaction data into the ticker system. The
position was eliminated many years ago.
    Finally, Rule 128B.10 provides that, in addition to (proposed
senior-level) Floor Official approval, both ``buying and selling
members'' must agree to the publication of (1) A change or a correction
in a transaction that previously appeared on the Tape, (2) the
cancellation of a transaction which previously appeared on the Tape and
which was properly rescinded, or (3) a transaction omitted from the
Tape made on the Tape on the day of the transaction. The Exchange
proposes to add ``or member organizations'' after ``buying and selling
members.'' Rule 2 defines a ``member'' as a natural person. A
significant number of Exchange member organizations, however, no longer
have Floor-based members, and nearly all transactions printed to the
Tape are executed by automated systems. The proposed change to Rule
128B.10 reflects the changes in the NYSE marketplace away from Floor-
based members manually executing the majority of trades printed to the
Tape to

more automated trading by an increasing number of non-Floor based
member organizations.
2. Statutory Basis
    The Exchange believes that the proposed rule change is consistent
with the provisions of Section 6 of the Act,\5\ in general, and Section
6(b)(4) of the Act,\6\ in particular, in that it is designed to prevent
fraudulent and manipulative acts and practices, to promote just and
equitable principles of trade, to foster cooperation and coordination
with persons engaged in facilitating transactions in securities, and to
remove impediments to and perfect the mechanism of a free and open
market and a national market system. Specifically, the Exchange
believes that the proposed rule changes support the objectives of the
Act by amending and/or delegating duties and responsibilities once
assigned to Floor Officials to better comport with the Exchange's
current market structure and to reflect rapidly changing market
technology and the development of automated systems.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \5\ 15 U.S.C. 78f(b).
    \6\ 15 U.S.C. 78f(b)(4).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

B. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement on Burden on Competition

    The Exchange does not believe that the proposed rule change will
impose any burden on competition that is not necessary or appropriate
in furtherance of the purposes of the Act.

C. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement on Comments on the Proposed
Rule Change Received from Members, Participants, or Others

    No written comments were solicited or received with respect to the
proposed rule change.

III. Date of Effectiveness of the Proposed Rule Change and Timing for
Commission Action

    The Exchange has filed the proposed rule change pursuant to Section
19(b)(3)(A)(iii) of the Act \7\ and Rule 19b-4(f)(6) thereunder.\8\
Because the proposed rule change does not: (i) Significantly affect the
protection of investors or the public interest; (ii) impose any
significant burden on competition; and (iii) become operative prior to
30 days from the date on which it was filed the proposed rule change
has become effective pursuant to Section 19(b)(3)(A) of the Act and
Rule 19b-4(f)(6)(iii) thereunder.\9\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \7\ 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(3)(A)(iii).
    \8\ 17 CFR 240.19b-4(f)(6).
    \9\ 17 CFR 240.19b-4(f)(6). In addition, Rule 19b-4(f)(6)(iii)
requires the Exchange to give the Commission written notice of the
Exchange's intent to file the proposed rule change, along with a
brief description and text of the proposed rule change, at least
five business days prior to the date of filing of the proposed rule
change, or such shorter time as designated by the Commission. The
Exchange has satisfied this requirement.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    The Exchange has requested that the Commission waive the 30-day
operative delay. The Commission believes that waiver of the operative
delay is consistent with the protection of investors and the public
interest because the proposal will assist the Exchange in maintaining a
fair and orderly market by allowing market participants who agree to
cancel a transaction to do so more efficiently, thereby potentially
reducing the likelihood that transactions will be printed to the Tape
incorrectly. Therefore, the Commission designates the proposal
operative upon filing.\10\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \10\ For purposes only of waiving the 30-day operative delay,
the Commission has considered the proposed rules impact on
efficiency, competition, and capital formation. See 15 U.S.C.
78c(f).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    At any time within 60 days of the filing of such proposed rule
change, the Commission summarily may temporarily suspend such rule
change if it appears to the Commission that such action is necessary or
appropriate in the public interest, for the protection of investors, or
otherwise in furtherance of the purposes of the Act.

IV. Solicitation of Comments

    Interested persons are invited to submit written data, views, and
arguments concerning the foregoing, including whether the proposed rule
change is consistent with the Act. Comments may be submitted by any of
the following methods:

Electronic Comments

     Use the Commission's Internet comment form (http://www.sec.gov/rules/sro.shtml); or
     Send an email to<EMAIL_ADDRESS>Please include
File Number SR-NYSE-2012-20 on the subject line.

Paper Comments

     Send paper comments in triplicate to Elizabeth M. Murphy,
Secretary, Securities and Exchange Commission, 100 F Street NE.,
Washington, DC 20549-1090.

All submissions should refer to File Number SR-NYSE-2012-20. This file
number should be included on the subject line if email is used. To help
the Commission process and review your comments more efficiently,
please use only one method. The Commission will post all comments on
the Commission's Internet Web site (http://www.sec.gov/rules/sro.shtml). Copies of the submission, all subsequent amendments, all
written statements with respect to the proposed rule change that are
filed with the Commission, and all written communications relating to
the proposed rule change between the Commission and any person, other
than those that may be withheld from the public in accordance with the
provisions of 5 U.S.C. 552, will be available for Web site viewing and
printing in the Commission's Public Reference Room, 100 F Street NE.,
Washington, DC 20549, on official business days between the hours of 10
a.m. and 3 p.m. Copies of such filing also will be available for
inspection and copying at the principal office of the Exchange. All
comments received will be posted without change; the Commission does
not edit personal identifying information from submissions. You should
submit only information that you wish to make publicly available. All
submissions should refer to File Number SR-NYSE-2012-20 and should be
submitted on or before July 31, 2012.

    For the Commission, by the Division of Trading and Markets,
pursuant to delegated authority.\11\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \11\ 17 CFR 200.30-3(a)(12).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

Kevin M. O'Neill,
Deputy Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2012-16767 Filed 7-9-12; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 8011-01-P


[Federal Register Volume 75, Number 240 (Wednesday, December 15, 2010)]
[Notices]
[Pages 78272-78274]
[FR Doc No: 2010-31435]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

[Release No. 34-63468; File No. SR-EDGX-2010-19]

Self-Regulatory Organizations; EDGX Exchange, Inc.; Notice of
Filing and Immediate Effectiveness of Proposed Rule Change To Amend Its
Fee Schedule To Add Two New Routing Options

December 8, 2010.
    Pursuant to Section 19(b)(1) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934
(the ``Act''),\1\ and Rule 19b-4 thereunder,\2\ notice is hereby given
that on December 1, 2010, the EDGX Exchange, Inc. (the ``Exchange'' or
the ``EDGX'') filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission
(``Commission'') the proposed rule change as described in Items I and
II below, which items have been prepared by the self-regulatory
organization. The Commission is publishing this notice to solicit
comments on the proposed rule change from interested persons.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \1\ 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(1).
    \2\ 17 CFR 240.19b-4.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

I. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement of the Terms of Substance
of the Proposed Rule Change

    The Exchange proposes to amend its fee schedule, which contains a
list of routing options, to add two new

additional ones. The text of the proposed rule change is attached as
Exhibit 5 and is available on the Exchange's Web site at http://www.directedge.com, at the Exchange's principal office, and at the
Public Reference Room of the Commission.

II. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement of the Purpose of, and
Statutory Basis for, the Proposed Rule Change

    In its filing with the Commission, the Exchange included statements
concerning the purpose of, and basis for, the proposed rule change and
discussed any comments it received on the proposed rule change. The
text of these statements may be examined at the places specified in
Item IV below. The self-regulatory organization has prepared summaries,
set forth in Sections A, B and C below, of the most significant aspects
of such statements.

A. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement of the Purpose of, and
Statutory Basis for, the Proposed Rule Change

1. Purpose
    The Exchange's fee schedule contains a current list of routing
options. The Exchange proposes to amend this schedule to add certain
new routing options, effective upon filing with the Commission. The
Exchange intends to implement the rule change on or about December 1,
2010.
    The Exchange proposes to introduce the ROBX and ROBY routing
options and add these to its routing table, which is part of the
Exchange fee schedule.
    The Exchange proposes to add the following descriptions of the ROBY
and ROBX routing strategies to its routing table: For the ROBY
strategy, the order sweeps the EDGX book and routes to BATS BYX
Exchange as an immediate or cancel (IOC) order, with the remainder
being cancelled if there is no execution. For the ROBX strategy, the
order sweeps the EDGX book and routes to Nasdaq BX Exchange as an
immediate or cancel (IOC) order, with the remainder being cancelled if
there is no execution.
    The Exchange believes that the proposed introduction of the ROBX
and ROBY routing strategies will provide market participants with
greater flexibility in routing orders, without having to develop their
own complicated routing strategies.
    Finally, the Exchange proposes to clarify in the description of the
ROBA routing strategy that the BATS Exchange referred to is the BATS
BZX Exchange.
2. Statutory Basis
    The Exchange believes that the proposed rule change is consistent
with Section 6(b)(5) of the Act,\3\ which requires the rules of an
exchange to promote just and equitable principles of trade, to remove
impediments to and perfect the mechanism of a free and open market and
a national market system and, in general, to protect investors and the
public interest. The proposed change to introduce the ROBX and ROBY
routing options will provide market participants with greater
flexibility in routing orders without developing complicated order
routing strategies on their own. In addition, it will provide
additional clarity and specificity to the Exchange's fee schedule
regarding routing strategies and will further enhance transparency with
respect to Exchange routing offerings.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \3\ 15 U.S.C. 78f(b)(5).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

B. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement on Burden on Competition

    The proposed rule change does not impose any burden on competition
that is not necessary or appropriate in furtherance of the purposes of
the Act.

C. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement on Comments on the Proposed
Rule Change Received From Members, Participants or Others

    The Exchange has not solicited, and does not intend to solicit,
comments on this proposed rule change. The Exchange has not received
any unsolicited written comments from members or other interested
parties.

III. Date of Effectiveness of the Proposed Rule Change and Timing for
Commission Action

    Because the foregoing proposed rule change does not: (1)
Significantly affect the protection of investors or the public
interest; (2) impose any significant burden on competition; and (3)
become operative for 30 days from the date on which it was filed, or
such shorter time as the Commission may designate if consistent with
the protection of investors and the public interest, it has become
effective pursuant to Section 19(b)(3)(A) of the Act \4\ and Rule 19b-
4(f)(6) thereunder.\5\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \4\ 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(3)(A).
    \5\ 17 CFR 240.19b-4(f)(6). In addition, Rule 19b-4(f)(6)
requires the Exchange to give the Commission written notice of its
intent to file the proposed rule change, along with a brief
description and text of the proposed rule change, at least five
business days prior to the date on which the Exchange filed the
proposed rule change, or such shorter time as designated by the
Commission. The Commission has waived the five-day pre-filing
requirement.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    A proposed rule change filed under Rule 19b-4(f)(6) normally may
not become operative prior to 30 days after the date of filing.\6\
However, Rule 19b-4(f)(6) \7\ permits the Commission to designate a
shorter time if such action is consistent with the protection of
investors and the public interest. The Exchange has requested that the
Commission waive the 30-day operative delay so that the proposal may
become operative upon filing. The Commission notes (i) The proposal
could provide market participants with more options to route orders;
(ii) it presents no novel issues; and (iii) it may provide a benefit to
market participants. For these reasons, the Commission believes it is
consistent with the protection of investors and the public interest to
waive the 30-day operative delay, and hereby grants such waiver.\8\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \6\ 17 CFR 240.19b-4(f)(6)(iii).
    \7\ Id.
    \8\ For the purposes only of waiving the operative date of this
proposal, the Commission has considered the proposed rule's impact
on efficiency, competition, and capital formation. See 15 U.S.C.
78c(f).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    At any time within 60 days of the filing of such proposed rule
change, the Commission summarily may temporarily suspend such rule
change if it appears to the Commission that such action is necessary or
appropriate in the public interest, for the protection of investors, or
otherwise in furtherance of the purposes of the Act.

IV. Solicitation of Comments

    Interested persons are invited to submit written data, views, and
arguments concerning the foregoing, including whether the proposed rule
change is consistent with the Act. Comments may be submitted by any of
the following methods:

Electronic Comments

     Use the Commission's Internet comment form http://www.sec.gov/rules/sro.shtml; or
     Send an e-mail to<EMAIL_ADDRESS>Please include
File Number SR-EDGX-2010-19 on the subject line.

Paper Comments

     Send paper comments in triplicate to Elizabeth M. Murphy,
Secretary, Securities and Exchange Commission, 100 F Street, NE.,
Washington, DC 20549-1090.

All submissions should refer to File Number SR-EDGX-2010-19. This file
number should be included on the subject line if e-mail is used. To
help the Commission process and review your comments more efficiently,
please use

only one method. The Commission will post all comments on the
Commission's Internet Web site http://www.sec.gov/rules/sro.shtml.
Copies of the submission,\9\ all subsequent amendments, all written
statements with respect to the proposed rule change that are filed with
the Commission, and all written communications relating to the proposed
rule change between the Commission and any person, other than those
that may be withheld from the public in accordance with the provisions
of 5 U.S.C. 552, will be available for Web site viewing and printing in
the Commission's Public Reference Room, 100 F Street, NE., Washington,
DC 20549, on official business days between the hours of 10 a.m. and 3
p.m. Copies of the filing also will be available for inspection and
copying at the principal office of the Exchange. All comments received
will be posted without change; the Commission does not edit personal
identifying information from submissions. You should submit only
information that you wish to make available publicly. All submissions
should refer to File Number SR-EDGX-2010-19 and should be submitted on
or before January 5, 2011.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \9\ The text of the proposed rule change is available on
Exchange's Web site at http://www.directedge.com, on the
Commission's Web site at http://www.sec.gov, at EDGX, and at the
Commission's Public Reference Room.

    For the Commission, by the Division of Trading and Markets,
pursuant to delegated authority.\10\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \10\ 17 CFR 200.30-3(a)(12).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

Florence E. Harmon,
Deputy Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2010-31435 Filed 12-14-10; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 8011-01-P


[Federal Register Volume 83, Number 108 (Tuesday, June 5, 2018)]
[Notices]
[Pages 26129-26131]
[FR Doc No: 2018-11983]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

[Release No. 34-83346; File No. SR-BX-2018-021]

Self-Regulatory Organizations; Nasdaq BX, Inc.; Notice of Filing
and Immediate Effectiveness of the Proposed Rule Change To Amend the
Descriptions of Certain Data Feeds Within Chapter VI, Section 19
Entitled ``Data Feeds and Trade Information.''

May 30, 2018.
    Pursuant to Section 19(b)(1) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934
(the ``Act''),\1\ and Rule 19b-4 thereunder,\2\ notice is hereby given
that on May 25, 2018, Nasdaq BX, Inc. (``BX'' or ``Exchange'') filed
with the Securities and Exchange Commission (``Commission'') the
proposed rule change as described in Items I and II below, which Items
have been prepared by the Exchange. The Commission is publishing this
notice to solicit comments on the proposed rule change from interested
persons.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \1\ 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(1).
    \2\ 17 CFR 240.19b-4.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

I. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement of the Terms of Substance
of the Proposed Rule Change

    The Exchange proposes to amend the descriptions of certain data
feeds within Chapter VI, Section 19 entitled ``Data Feeds and Trade
Information.'' The text of the proposed rule change is available on the
Exchange's website at http://nasdaqbx.cchwallstreet.com/, at the

principal office of the Exchange, and at the Commission's Public
Reference Room.

II. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement of the Purpose of, and the
Statutory Basis for, the Proposed Rule Change

    In its filing with the Commission, the Exchange included statements
concerning the purpose of and basis for the proposed rule change and
discussed any comments it received on the proposed rule change. The
text of these statements may be examined at the places specified in
Item IV below. The Exchange has prepared summaries, set forth in
sections A, B, and C below, of the most significant aspects of such
statements.

A. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement of the Purpose of, and the
Statutory Basis for, the Proposed Rule Change

1. Purpose
    The Exchange proposes to amend Chapter VI, Section 19 entitled
``Data Feeds and Trade Information'' to: (i) To further detail the type
of information available on BX Depth of Market (BX Depth); and (ii) add
a sentence to BX Depth and BX Top of Market (BX Top) which describes
symbol directory information with a more specific description of the
options symbol directory that was recently utilized in ISE Rule
718(a).\3\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \3\ The data provided for each options series includes the
symbols (series and underlying security), put or call indicator,
expiration date, the strike price of the series, and whether the
option series is available for trading on ISE and identifies if the
series is available for closing transactions only.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    The Exchange desires to amend the description for BX Depth which
currently provides, ``BX Depth is a data feed that provides quotation
information for individual orders on the BX Options book, last sale
information for trades executed on BX Options, and Order Imbalance
Information as set forth in BX Options Rules Chapter VI, Section 8.''
The Exchange proposes to amend this sentence to provide, ``BX Depth is
a data feed that provides full order and quote depth information for
individual orders and quotes on the BX Options book, last sale
information for trades executed on BX Options, and Order Imbalance
Information as set forth in BX Options Rules Chapter VI, Section 8.''
The Exchange proposes this language to make clear that this data feed
has full order and quote information and not top of book information.
The Exchange believes this proposed language will bring greater clarity
to this description. The BX Depth feed is not changing.
    Also, today BX Depth and BX Top have an options symbol directory
within those data feeds. The Exchange proposes to add a sentence to
each of those data feeds to describe the data provided for each options
series. The data includes the symbol (series and underlying security),
put or call indicator, expiration date, the strike price of the series,
and whether the option series is available for trading on BX and
identifies if the series is available for closing transactions only.
The Exchange inadvertently excluded this information when it originally
filed the description for these feeds. The Exchange believes that
adding this language will bring greater clarity to each of these feeds.
    The Exchange also proposes to replace the word ``Exchange'' with
``BX'' in Section 19(a).
2. Statutory Basis
    The Exchange believes that the proposed rule change is consistent
with Section 6(b) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934,\4\ in
general, and furthers the objectives of Section 6(b)(5) of the Act,\5\
in particular, in that it is designed to promote just and equitable
principles of trade, to remove impediments to and perfect the mechanism
for a free and open market and a national market system, and, in
general, to protect investors and the public interest, by providing
greater transparency to the data feed information offered on BX. The
Exchange's proposal to add more detail to both the BX Depth and BX Top
data feeds will bring greater transparency to the Exchange's Rules. The
Exchange believes that the proposed rule change is consistent with the
protection of investors and the public interest as it provides
information relating to the data available on the Exchange for the
benefit of its Participants within its Rules and adds greater
transparency to these offerings. Finally, the amendments seek to add
greater clarity to the data offerings and conform the text of the
offerings across its Nasdaq affiliated markets.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \4\ 15 U.S.C. 78f(b).
    \5\ 15 U.S.C. 78f(b)(5).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

B. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement on Burden on Competition

    In accordance with Section 6(b)(8) of the Act,\6\ the Exchange does
not believe that the proposed rule change will impose any burden on
intermarket or intra-market competition that is not necessary or
appropriate in furtherance of the purposes of the Act. The data feed
offerings are available to any market participant. The Exchange's
proposal to amend the data offerings will bring greater transparency to
the Rulebook. The amendments seek to add greater clarity to the data
offerings and conform the text of the offerings.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \6\ 15 U.S.C. 78f(b)(8).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

C. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement on Comments on the Proposed
Rule Change Received From Members, Participants, or Others

    No written comments were either solicited or received.

III. Date of Effectiveness of the Proposed Rule Change and Timing for
Commission Action

    Because the proposed rule change does not: (i) Significantly affect
the protection of investors or the public interest; (ii) impose any
significant burden on competition; and (iii) become operative for 30
days from the date on which it was filed, or such shorter time as the
Commission may designate, if consistent with the protection of
investors and the public interest, the proposed rule change has become
effective pursuant to Section 19(b)(3)(A) of the Act \7\ and Rule 19b-
4(f)(6) thereunder.\8\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \7\ 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(3)(A).
    \8\ 17 CFR 240.19b-4(f)(6). In addition, Rule 19b-4(f)(6)(iii)
requires the Exchange to give the Commission written notice the
Exchange's intent to file the proposed rule change, along with a
brief description and text of the proposed rule change at least five
business days prior to the date of filing of the proposed rule
change, or such shorter time as designated by the Commission. The
Exchange has satisfied this requirement.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    A proposed rule change filed under Rule 19b-4(f)(6) \9\ normally
does not become operative for 30 days after the date of filing.
However, pursuant to Rule 19b-4(f)(6)(iii),\10\ the Commission may
designate a shorter time if such action is consistent with the
protection of investors and the public interest. The Exchange has asked
the Commission to waive the 30-day operative delay so that the proposal
may become operative immediately upon filing. The Exchange has asked
the Commission to waive the 30-day operative delay so that the proposal
may become operative upon filing. The Exchange states that such waiver
will allow it to update its rules to provide more detail regarding its
data offerings and will further the protection of investors and the
public interest because it will provide greater transparency as to the
data offerings available to members. For this reason, the Commission
believes that waiving

the 30-day operative delay is consistent with the protection of
investors and the public interest and, therefore, the Commission
designates the proposed rule change to be operative upon filing.\11\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \9\ 17 CFR 240.19b-4(f)(6).
    \10\ 17 CFR 240.19b-4(f)(6)(iii).
    \11\ For purposes only of waiving the 30-day operative delay,
the Commission has also considered the proposed rule's impact on
efficiency, competition, and capital formation. See 15 U.S.C.
78c(f).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    At any time within 60 days of the filing of the proposed rule
change, the Commission summarily may temporarily suspend such rule
change if it appears to the Commission that such action is necessary or
appropriate in the public interest, for the protection of investors, or
otherwise in furtherance of the purposes of the Act. If the Commission
takes such action, the Commission shall institute proceedings to
determine whether the proposed rule should be approved or disapproved.

IV. Solicitation of Comments

    Interested persons are invited to submit written data, views, and
arguments concerning the foregoing, including whether the proposed rule
change is consistent with the Act. Comments may be submitted by any of
the following methods:

Electronic Comments

     Use the Commission's internet comment form (http://www.sec.gov/rules/sro.shtml); or
     Send an email to [email protected]. Please include
File Number SR-BX-2018-021 on the subject line.

Paper Comments

     Send paper comments in triplicate to Secretary, Securities
and Exchange Commission, 100 F Street NE, Washington, DC 20549-1090.

All submissions should refer to File Number SR-BX-2018-021. This file
number should be included on the subject line if email is used. To help
the Commission process and review your comments more efficiently,
please use only one method. The Commission will post all comments on
the Commission's internet website (http://www.sec.gov/rules/sro.shtml).
Copies of the submission, all subsequent amendments, all written
statements with respect to the proposed rule change that are filed with
the Commission, and all written communications relating to the proposed
rule change between the Commission and any person, other than those
that may be withheld from the public in accordance with the provisions
of 5 U.S.C. 552, will be available for website viewing and printing in
the Commission's Public Reference Room, 100 F Street NE, Washington, DC
20549, on official business days between the hours of 10:00 a.m. and
3:00 p.m. Copies of the filing also will be available for inspection
and copying at the principal office of the Exchange. All comments
received will be posted without change. Persons submitting comments are
cautioned that we do not redact or edit personal identifying
information from comment submissions. You should submit only
information that you wish to make available publicly. All submissions
should refer to File Number SR-BX-2018-021 and should be submitted on
or before June 26, 2018.

    For the Commission, by the Division of Trading and Markets,
pursuant to delegated authority.\12\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \12\ 17 CFR 200.30-3(a)(12).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

Eduardo A. Aleman,
Assistant Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2018-11983 Filed 6-4-18; 8:45 am]
 BILLING CODE 8011-01-P


[Federal Register Volume 83, Number 57 (Friday, March 23, 2018)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Pages 12659-12662]
[FR Doc No: 2018-05014]

=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION

Federal Aviation Administration

14 CFR Part 39

[Docket No. FAA-2017-0495; Product Identifier 2017-NM-017-AD; Amendment
39-19222; AD 2018-06-02]
RIN 2120-AA64

Airworthiness Directives; Bombardier, Inc., Airplanes

AGENCY: Federal Aviation Administration (FAA), Department of
Transportation (DOT).

ACTION: Final rule.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: We are adopting a new airworthiness directive (AD) for all
Bombardier, Inc., Model CL-600-2B19 (Regional Jet Series 100 & 440),
Model CL-600-2C10 (Regional Jet Series 700, 701, & 702), Model CL-600-
2D15 (Regional Jet Series 705), and Model CL-600-2D24 (Regional Jet
Series 900) airplanes. This AD was prompted by development of a
modification to prevent uncommanded rudder movement during flight. This
AD requires modifying the wiring harness of the yaw damper control
system. We are issuing this AD to address the unsafe condition on these
products.

DATES: This AD is effective April 27, 2018.
    The Director of the Federal Register approved the incorporation by
reference of certain publications listed in this AD as of April 27,
2018.

ADDRESSES: For service information identified in this final rule,
contact Bombardier, Inc., 400 C[ocirc]te-Vertu Road West, Dorval,
Qu[eacute]bec H4S 1Y9, Canada; Widebody Customer Response Center North
America toll-free telephone 1-866-538-1247 or direct-dial telephone 1-
514-855-2999; fax<PHONE_NUMBER>; email [email protected];
internet: http://www.bombardier.com.

You may view this referenced service information at the FAA, Transport
Standards Branch, 2200 South 216th St., Des Moines, WA. For information
on the availability of this material at the FAA, call<PHONE_NUMBER>. It
is also available on the internet at http://www.regulations.gov by
searching for and locating Docket No. FAA-2017-0495.

Examining the AD Docket

    You may examine the AD docket on the internet at http://www.regulations.gov by searching for and locating Docket No. FAA-2017-
0495; or in person at the Docket Management Facility between 9 a.m. and
5 p.m., Monday through Friday, except Federal holidays. The AD docket
contains this AD, the regulatory evaluation, any comments received, and
other information. The street address for the Docket Office (telephone
800-647-5527) is Docket Management Facility, U.S. Department of
Transportation, Docket Operations, M-30, West Building Ground Floor,
Room W12-140, 1200 New Jersey Avenue SE, Washington, DC 20590.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Cesar Gomez, Aerospace Engineer,
Airframe and Mechanical Systems Section, New York ACO Branch, FAA, 1600
Stewart Avenue, Suite 410, Westbury, NY 11590; telephone<PHONE_NUMBER>;
fax<PHONE_NUMBER>.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

Discussion

    We issued a notice of proposed rulemaking (NPRM) to amend 14 CFR
part 39 by adding an AD that would apply to all Bombardier, Inc., Model
CL-600-2B19 (Regional Jet Series 100 & 440), Model CL-600-2C10
(Regional Jet Series 700, 701, & 702), Model CL-600-2D15 (Regional Jet
Series 705), and Model CL-600-2D24 (Regional Jet Series 900) airplanes.
The NPRM published in the Federal Register on May 31, 2017 (82 FR
24897) (``the NPRM''). The NPRM was prompted by development of a
modification to prevent uncommanded rudder movement during flight. The
NPRM proposed to require modifying the wiring harness of the yaw damper
control system. We are issuing this AD to prevent uncommanded rudder
movement and consequent loss of the ability to control the airplane.
    Transport Canada Civil Aviation (TCCA), which is the aviation
authority for Canada, has issued Canadian Airworthiness Directive CF-
2017-06, effective February 14, 2017 (referred to after this as the
Mandatory Continuing Airworthiness Information, or ``the MCAI''), to
correct an unsafe condition for all Bombardier, Inc., Model CL-600-2B19
(Regional Jet Series 100 & 440), Model CL-600-2C10 (Regional Jet Series
700, 701, & 702), Model CL-600-2D15 (Regional Jet Series 705), and
Model CL-600-2D24 (Regional Jet Series 900) airplanes. The MCAI states:

    [Canadian] AD CF-2013-13 was issued on 28 May 2013 [related to
FAA AD 2013-14-11, Amendment 39-17516 (78 FR 44871, July 25, 2013)
(``AD 2013-14-11'')] to mandate the introduction of an emergency
procedure to the Aeroplane Flight Manual to address the uncommanded
rudder movement.
    Since the original issue of [Canadian] AD CF-2013-13, Bombardier
Aerospace has developed a wiring modification for the yaw damper
control system to prevent uncommanded movement of the rudder [and
consequent loss of the ability to control the airplane].
    This [Canadian] AD mandates the wiring modification for the yaw
damper control system * * *.

    You may examine the MCAI in the AD docket on the internet at http://www.regulations.gov by searching for and locating Docket No. FAA-20**-
****.

Comments

    We gave the public the opportunity to participate in developing
this AD. The following presents the comments received on the NPRM and
the FAA's response to each comment.

Support for the NPRM

    The Air Line Pilots Association, International (ALPA), agreed with
the intent of the NPRM.

Request To Clarify Credit for Certain Service Information

    SkyWest Airlines and Ahmad Lababidi asked that we revise paragraph
(h) of the proposed AD to clarify the credit language for accomplishing
the engineering orders in conjunction with the referenced service
information. Ahmad Lababidi stated that Service Non-Incorporated
Engineering Order (SNIEO) K601R50211 S02, dated October 31, 2014, was
issued for certain airplane configurations where the wire connector was
changed from pin type to socket type. The commenters added that SNIEOs
K601R50211 S03, dated April 21, 2015, and S04, dated April 24, 2015,
were issued to clarify certain splicing, capping, and stowing
locations, and to reduce the work hours for accomplishing the actions
specified in the service bulletin. The commenters added that it is not
necessary to do the engineering orders in conjunction with the
referenced service information. SkyWest reported accomplishing the
modification on some airplanes using only the applicable service
bulletin without any reference to the SNIEOs specified in paragraph (h)
of the proposed AD.
    We agree with the commenters' requests for the reasons provided. We
have revised paragraphs (h)(1)(i) and (h)(1)(ii) of this AD to remove
reference to the SNIEOs, which are not required to be used in
conjunction with the referenced service information.

Request To Revise Parts Installation Limitations Paragraph

    Air Wisconsin asked that we revise paragraph (i) of the proposed AD
(Parts Installation Limitations) to exclude parts on which the actions
in the referenced service information have been done.
    We acknowledge the commenter's request. However, paragraph (i) of
this AD already prohibits installation of a yaw damper actuator . . .
``unless it has been modified in accordance with the applicable service
information specified in table 1 to paragraph (g) of this AD.'' Since
existing language meets the intent of the commenter's request, we have
not changed this AD in this regard.

Conclusion

    We reviewed the relevant data, considered the comments received,
and determined that air safety and the public interest require adopting
this AD with the changes described previously, and minor editorial
changes. We have determined that these minor changes:
     Are consistent with the intent that was proposed in the
NPRM for correcting the unsafe condition; and
     Do not add any additional burden upon the public than was
already proposed in the NPRM.
    We also determined that these changes will not increase the
economic burden on any operator or increase the scope of this AD.

Related Service Information Under 1 CFR Part 51

    Bombardier has issued Service Bulletin 601R-22-017, Revision C,
dated May 11, 2016; and Service Bulletin 670BA-22-007, Revision A,
dated February 16, 2016. This service information describes procedures
for modifying the wiring harness of the yaw damper control system.
These documents are distinct since they apply to different airplane
models. This service information is reasonably available because the
interested parties have access to it through their normal course of
business or by the means identified in the ADDRESSES section.

Costs of Compliance

    We estimate that this AD affects 1,006 airplanes of U.S. registry.
    We estimate the following costs to comply with this AD:

                                                 Estimated Costs
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
                                                                                Cost on U.S.
             Action                    Labor cost            Parts cost      Cost per product      operators
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Wiring modification............  5 work-hours x $85 per  Up to $39........  Up to $464.......  Up to $466,784.
                                  hour = $425.
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

    According to the manufacturer, some of the costs of this AD may be
covered under warranty, thereby reducing the cost impact on affected
individuals. We do not control warranty coverage for affected
individuals. As a result, we have included all costs in our cost
estimate.

Authority for This Rulemaking

    Title 49 of the United States Code specifies the FAA's authority to
issue rules on aviation safety. Subtitle I, section 106, describes the
authority of the FAA Administrator. ``Subtitle VII: Aviation
Programs,'' describes in more detail the scope of the Agency's
authority.
    We are issuing this rulemaking under the authority described in
``Subtitle VII, Part A, Subpart III, Section 44701: General
requirements.'' Under that section, Congress charges the FAA with
promoting safe flight of civil aircraft in air commerce by prescribing
regulations for practices, methods, and procedures the Administrator
finds necessary for safety in air commerce. This regulation is within
the scope of that authority because it addresses an unsafe condition
that is likely to exist or develop on products identified in this
rulemaking action.
    This AD is issued in accordance with authority delegated by the
Executive Director, Aircraft Certification Service, as authorized by
FAA Order 8000.51C. In accordance with that order, issuance of ADs is
normally a function of the Compliance and Airworthiness Division, but
during this transition period, the Executive Director has delegated the
authority to issue ADs applicable to transport category airplanes to
the Director of the System Oversight Division.

Regulatory Findings

    We determined that this AD will not have federalism implications
under Executive Order 13132. This AD will not have a substantial direct
effect on the States, on the relationship between the national
government and the States, or on the distribution of power and
responsibilities among the various levels of government.
    For the reasons discussed above, I certify that this AD:
    1. Is not a ``significant regulatory action'' under Executive Order
12866,
    2. Is not a ``significant rule'' under the DOT Regulatory Policies
and Procedures (44 FR 11034, February 26, 1979),
    3. Will not affect intrastate aviation in Alaska, and
    4. Will not have a significant economic impact, positive or
negative, on a substantial number of small entities under the criteria
of the Regulatory Flexibility Act.

List of Subjects in 14 CFR Part 39

    Air transportation, Aircraft, Aviation safety, Incorporation by
reference, Safety.

Adoption of the Amendment

    Accordingly, under the authority delegated to me by the
Administrator, the FAA amends 14 CFR part 39 as follows:

PART 39--AIRWORTHINESS DIRECTIVES

0
1. The authority citation for part 39 continues to read as follows:

    Authority: 49 U.S.C. 106(g), 40113, 44701.

Sec.  39.13  [Amended]

0
2. The FAA amends Sec.  39.13 by adding the following new airworthiness
directive (AD):

2018-06-02 Bombardier, Inc.: Amendment 39-19222; Docket No. FAA-
2017-0495; Product Identifier 2017-NM-017-AD.

(a) Effective Date

    This AD is effective April 27, 2018.

(b) Affected ADs

    None.

(c) Applicability

    This AD applies to all Bombardier, Inc., Model CL-600-2B19
(Regional Jet Series 100 & 440), Model CL-600-2C10 (Regional Jet
Series 700, 701, & 702), Model CL-600-2D15 (Regional Jet Series
705), and Model CL-600-2D24 (Regional Jet Series 900) airplanes,
certificated in any category.

(d) Subject

    Air Transport Association (ATA) of America Code 22, Auto Flight.

(e) Reason

    This AD was prompted by development of a modification to prevent
uncommanded rudder movement during flight. We are issuing this AD to
prevent uncommanded rudder movement and consequent loss of the
ability to control the airplane.

(f) Compliance

    Comply with this AD within the compliance times specified,
unless already done.

(g) Modification

    Within 6,600 flight hours or 36 months after the effective date
of this AD, whichever occurs first: Modify the wiring harness of the
yaw damper control system, in accordance with the applicable service
information specified in table 1 to paragraph (g) of this AD.

[GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] TR23MR18.021

(h) Credit for Previous Actions

    (1) This paragraph provides credit for actions required by
paragraph (g) of this AD for Model CL-600-2B19 (Regional Jet Series
100 & 440) airplanes, if those actions were performed before the
effective date of this AD using the service information specified in
paragraph (h)(1)(i), (h)(1)(ii), or (h)(1)(iii) of this AD.
    (i) Bombardier Service Bulletin 601R-22-017, dated September 24,
2014.
    (ii) Bombardier Service Bulletin 601R-22-017, Revision A, dated
February 26, 2015.
    (iii) Bombardier Service Bulletin 601R-22-017, Revision B, dated
July 16, 2015.
    (2) This paragraph provides credit for actions required by
paragraph (g) of this AD for Model CL-600-2C10 (Regional Jet Series
700, 701, & 702), Model CL-600-2D15 (Regional Jet Series 705), and
Model CL-600-2D24 (Regional Jet Series 900) airplanes, if those
actions were performed before the effective date of this AD using
Bombardier Service Bulletin 670BA-22-007, dated October 15, 2014.

(i) Parts Installation Limitations

    As of 24 months after the effective date of this AD, no person
may install, on any airplane, a yaw damper actuator having part
number 622-9968-001, unless it has been modified in accordance with
the applicable service information specified in table 1 to paragraph
(g) of this AD.

(j) Other FAA AD Provisions

    The following provisions also apply to this AD:
    (1) Alternative Methods of Compliance (AMOCs): The Manager, New
York ACO Branch, FAA, has the authority to approve AMOCs for this
AD, if requested using the procedures found in 14 CFR 39.19. In
accordance with 14 CFR 39.19, send your request to your principal
inspector or local Flight Standards District Office, as appropriate.
If sending information directly to the manager of the New York ACO,
send it to ATTN: Program Manager, Continuing Operational Safety, New
York ACO Branch, FAA, 1600 Stewart Avenue, Suite 410, Westbury, NY
11590; telephone<PHONE_NUMBER>; fax<PHONE_NUMBER>. Before using any
approved AMOC, notify your appropriate principal inspector, or
lacking a principal inspector, the manager of the local flight
standards district office/certificate holding district office.
    (2) Contacting the Manufacturer: For any requirement in this AD
to obtain corrective actions from a manufacturer, the action must be
accomplished using a method approved by the Manager, New York ACO
Branch, FAA; or Transport Canada Civil Aviation (TCCA); or
Bombardier, Inc.'s TCCA Design Approval Organization (DAO). If
approved by the DAO, the approval must include the DAO-authorized
signature.

(k) Related Information

    (1) Refer to Mandatory Continuing Airworthiness Information
(MCAI) Canadian Airworthiness Directive CF-2017-06, effective
February 14, 2017, for related information. This MCAI may be found
in the AD docket on the internet at http://www.regulations.gov by
searching for and locating Docket No. FAA-2017-0495.
    (2) For more information about this AD, contact Cesar Gomez,
Aerospace Engineer, Airframe and Mechanical Systems Section, New
York ACO Branch, FAA, 1600 Stewart Avenue, Suite 410, Westbury, NY
11590; telephone<PHONE_NUMBER>; fax<PHONE_NUMBER>.
    (3) Service information identified in this AD that is not
incorporated by reference is available at the addresses specified in
paragraphs (l)(3) and (l)(4) of this AD.

(l) Material Incorporated by Reference

    (1) The Director of the Federal Register approved the
incorporation by reference (IBR) of the service information listed
in this paragraph under 5 U.S.C. 552(a) and 1 CFR part 51.
    (2) You must use this service information as applicable to do
the actions required by this AD, unless this AD specifies otherwise.
    (i) Bombardier Service Bulletin 601R-22-017, Revision C, dated
May 11, 2016.
    (ii) Bombardier Service Bulletin 670BA-22-007, Revision A, dated
February 16, 2016.
    (3) For service information identified in this AD, contact
Bombardier, Inc., 400 C[ocirc]te-Vertu Road West, Dorval,
Qu[eacute]bec H4S 1Y9, Canada; Widebody Customer Response Center
North America toll-free telephone 1-866-538-1247 or direct-dial
telephone 1-514-855-2999; fax<PHONE_NUMBER>; email
[email protected]; internet: http://www.bombardier.com.
    (4) You may view this service information at the FAA, Transport
Standards Branch, 2200 South 216th St., Des Moines, WA. For
information on the availability of this material at the FAA, call
206-231-3195.
    (5) You may view this service information that is incorporated
by reference at the National Archives and Records Administration
(NARA). For information on the availability of this material at
NARA, call<PHONE_NUMBER>, or go to: http://www.archives.gov/federal-register/cfr/ibr-locations.html.

    Issued in Renton, Washington, on March 2, 2018.
Michael Kaszycki,
Acting Director, System Oversight Division, Aircraft Certification
Service.
[FR Doc. 2018-05014 Filed 3-22-18; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910-13-P


 [Federal Register: August 26, 2008 (Volume 73, Number 166)] [ Notices]                [Page 50397-50398] [DOCID:fr26au08-120]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION

Federal Aviation Administration

[Summary Notice No. PE-2008-40]

  Petition for Exemption; Summary of Petition Received

AGENCY: Federal Aviation Administration (FAA), DOT.

ACTION: Notice of petition for exemption received.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: This notice contains a summary of a petition seeking relief

from specified requirements of 14 CFR. The purpose of this notice is to

improve the public's awareness of, and participation in, this aspect of

FAA's regulatory activities. Neither publication of this notice nor the

inclusion or omission of information in the summary is intended to

affect the legal status of the petition or its final disposition.

DATES: Comments on this petition must identify the petition docket

number involved and must be received on or before September 15, 2008.

ADDRESSES: You may send comments identified by Docket Number FAA-2008-

0738 using any of the following methods:

     Government-wide rulemaking Web site: Go to http://

www.regulations.gov and follow the instructions for sending your

comments electronically.

     Mail: Send comments to the Docket Management Facility;

U.S. Department of Transportation, 1200 New Jersey Avenue, SE., West

Building Ground Floor, Room W12-140, Washington, DC 20590.

     Fax: Fax comments to the Docket Management Facility at

202-493-2251.

     Hand Delivery: Bring comments to the Docket Management

Facility in Room W12-140 of the West Building Ground Floor at 1200 New

Jersey Avenue, SE., Washington, DC, between 9 a.m. and 5 p.m., Monday

through Friday, except Federal holidays.

    Privacy: We will post all comments we receive, without change, to

http://www.regulations.gov, including any personal information you

provide. Using the search function of our docket web site, anyone can

find and read the comments received into any of our dockets, including

the name of the individual sending the comment (or signing the comment

for an association, business, labor union, etc.). You may review DOT's

complete Privacy Act Statement in the Federal Register published on

April 11, 2000 (65 FR 19477-78).

    Docket: To read background documents or comments received, go to

http://www.regulations.gov at any time or to the Docket Management

Facility in Room W12-140 of the West Building Ground Floor at 1200 New

Jersey Avenue, SE., Washington, DC, between 9 a.m. and 5 p.m., Monday

through Friday, except Federal holidays.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Annette Kovite, ANM-113,

Standardization Branch, Federal Aviation Administration, 1601 Lind

Avenue, SW., Renton, WA 98057-3356,<PHONE_NUMBER>.

    This notice is published pursuant to 14 CFR 11.85.

    Issued in Washington, DC, on August 20, 2008.

Pamela Hamilton-Powell,

Director, Office of Rulemaking.

Petition for Exemption

    Docket No.: FAA-2008-0738.

    Petitioner: BAE Systems (Operations) Ltd.

    Section of 14 CFR Affected: Sec. Sec.  26.11, 26.43, 26.45, and

26.49.

    Description of Relief Sought: BAE Systems (Operations) Ltd.

requests an exemption from the design approval holder requirements of

Sec. Sec.  26.11, 26.43, 26.45, and 26.49 for the HS748 Series 2A and

2B airplane type. Section 26.11 requires development of instructions

for continued airworthiness applicable to an airplane's electrical

wiring interconnection system. Sections 26.43, 26.45, and 26.49 are

requirements related to development of damage tolerance data for

repairs and alterations.

[FR Doc. E8-19710 Filed 8-25-08; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4910-13-P


Ron Evans/RTP/USEPA/US

12/06/2007 02:19 PM

To

"King, Heidi R."<EMAIL_ADDRESS>"Johansson, Robert" <EMAIL_ADDRESS> cc

Janet Cakir/RTP/USEPA/US@EPA, darryl weatherhead, David Misenheimer/RTP/USEPA/US@EPA

Subject

O3 implementation rule materials

O3 implementation OMB-OIRA principals---Art Fraas & Amy Flynne (not there anymore)

Documents--see below.  don't worry about the 2003 reference in the pdf and word files..that's the docket number


PAPERWORK REDUCTION ACT SUBMISSION Please read the instructions before completing this form. For additional forms or assistance in completing this form, contact your agency's Paperwork Clearance Officer. Send two copies of this form, the collection instrument to be reviewed, the Supporting Statement and any additional documentation to: Office of Information and Regulatory Affairs, Office of Management and Budget, Docket Library, Room 10102, 725 17th Street NW Washington, DC 20503.

1. Agency/ Subagency originating request U. S. EPA, Office of Administration and Resources Management, Office of Acquisition Management 2. OMB control number b. G None a. 2030 0016 __ __ __ __

3. Type of information collection ( check one) a. G New collection b. G Revision of a currently approved collection c. X Extension of a currently approved collection d. G Reinstatement, without change, of a previously approved collection for which approval has expired e. G Reinstatement, with change, of a previously approved collection for which approval has expired f. G Existing collection in use without an OMB control number 4. Type of review requested ( check one) a. X Regular b. G Emergency  Approval requested by: / / c. G Delegated 5. Small entities Will this information collection have a significant economic impact on a substantial number of small entities? G Yes X No For b f, note item A2 of Supporting Statement Instructions 6. Requested expiration date a. X Three years from approval date b. G Other Specify: / /___

7. Title Contractor Cumulative Claim and Reconciliation 8. Agency form number( s) ( If applicable) ICR No. 0246.08 ( EPA Form 1900 10)

9. Keywords Procurement, Government 10. Abstract At the completion of a cost reimbursement contract, contractors report final costs incurred, including direct labor, materials, supplies, equipment, and other direct charges, subcontract costs, consultant fees, indirect costs and fees. Contractors report this information on EPA Form 1900 10. EPA uses this information to reconcile the contractor's costs, and determine proper reimbursement under the contract. Establishment of the final costs and fee is necessary to close out the contract.

11. Affected public ( Mark primary with " P" and all others that apply with " X") a. Individuals or households d. Farms b. P Business or other for profit e. Federal Government c. X Not for profit institutions f. State, Local or Tribal Government 12. Obligation to respond ( Mark primary with " P" and all others that apply with " X") a. G Voluntary b. X Required to obtain or retain benefits c. G Mandatory 13. Annual reporting and recordkeeping hour burden a. Number of respondents 247 b. Total annual responses 247 1. Percentage of these responses collected electronically 0 % c. Total hours requested 163 d. Current OMB inventory 65 e. Difference 98 f. Explanation of difference 1. Program Change 0 2. Adjustment 98 14. Annual reporting and recordkeeping cost burden ( in thousands of dollars)

a. Total annualized capital/ startup costs $ 0 b. Total annual costs ( O& M) $ 2 c. Total annualized cost requested $ 2 d. Current OMB inventory $ 0 e. Difference $ 2 f. Explanation of difference 1. Program change $ 0 2. Adjustment $ 2 15. Purpose of information collection ( Mark Primary With " P" and all others that apply with " X")

a. P Application for benefits e. __ Program planning or management b. __ Program evaluation f. __ Research c. __ General purpose statistics g. __ Regulatory or compliance d. X Audit 16. Frequency of recordkeeping or reporting ( check all that apply) a. X Recordkeeping b. Q Third party disclosure c. X Reporting 1. Q On occasion 2. Q Weekly 3. Q Monthly 4. Q Quarterly 5. Q Semi annually 6. Q Annually 7. Q Biannually 8. X Other ( describe) At contract completion 17. Statistical methods Does this information collection employ statistical methods?

Q Yes X No 18. Agency contact ( person who can best answer questions regarding the content of this submission) Name: Brian K. Long Phone: ( 202) 564 4737 OMB 83 I 10/ 95 19. Certification for Paperwork Reduction Act Submissions On behalf of this Federal agency, 1 certify that the collection of information encompassed by this request complies with' 5 CFR 1320.9.

NOTE: The text of 5 CFR 1320.9, and the related provisions of 5 CFR 1320.8( b)( 3), appear at the end of the instructions. The certification is to be made with reference to those regulatory provisions as set forth in the instructions.

The following is a summary of the topics, regarding the proposed collection of information, that the certification covers:

( a) It is necessary for the proper performance of agency functions;

( b) It avoids unnecessary duplication;

( c) It reduces burden on small entities;

( d) It uses plain, coherent, and unambiguous terminology that is understandable to respondents;

( e) Its implementation will be consistent and compatible with current reporting and recordkeeping practices;

( f) It indicates the retention periods for recordkeeping requirements;

( g) It informs respondents of the information called for under 5 CFR 1320.8( b)( 3): ( I) Why the information is being collected' ( ii) Use of information; ( iii) Burden estimate; ( iv) Nature of response ( voluntary, required for a benefit, or mandatory); ( v) Nature and extent of confidentiality; and ( vi) Need to display currently valid OMB control number;

( h) It was developed by an office that has planned and allocated resources for the efficient and effective management and use of the information to be collected ( see note in Item 19 of the instructions);

( I) It uses effective and efficient statistical survey methodology; and ( j) It makes appropriate use of information technology.

If you are unable to certify compliance with any of these provisions, identify the item below and explain the reason in Item 18 of the Supporting Statement.

Signature of Program Official Leigh Pomponio, Manager Policy Service Center Office of Acquisition Management Date Signature of Senior Official or designee Oscar Morales, Director Collection Strategies Division Office of Information Collection Office of Environmental Information Date OMB 83 I 10/ 95 Certification Requirement for Paperwork Reduction Act Submissions 5 CFR 1320.9 reads " As part of the agency submission to OMB of a proposed collection of information, the agency ( through the head of the agency, the Senior Official or their designee) shall certify ( and provide a record supporting such certification) that the proposed collection of information

"( a) is necessary for the proper performance of the functions of the agency, including that the information to be collected will have practical utility;

"( b) is not unnecessarily duplicative of information otherwise reasonably accessible to the agency;

"( c) reduces to the extent practicable and appropriate the burden on persons who shall provide information to or for the agency, including with respect to small entities, as defined in the Regulatory Flexibility Act 5 U. S. C § 601( 6)), the use of such techniques as:

"( 1) establishing differing compliance or reporting requirements or timetables that take into account the resources available to those who are to respond; "( 2) the clarification, consolidation, or simplification of compliance and reporting requirements; or collection of information , or any part thereof; "( 3) an exemption from coverage of the collection of information, or any part thereof;

"( d) is written using plain, coherent, and unambiguous terminology and is understandable to those who are to respond;

"( e) is to be implemented in ways consistent and compatible, to the maximum extent practicable, with the existing reporting and recordkeeping practices of those who are to respond;

"( f) indicates for each recordkeeping requirement the length of time persons are required to maintain the records specified;

"( g) informs potential respondents of the information called for under § 1320.8( b)( 3); [ see below]

"( h) has been developed by an office that has planned and allocated resources for the efficient and effective management and use of the information to be collected, including the processing of the information in a manner which shall enhance, where appropriate, the utility of the information to agencies and the public;

"( I) uses effective and efficient statistical survey methodology appropriate to the purpose for which the information is to be collected; and "( j) to the maximum extent practicable, uses appropriate information technology to reduce burden and improve data quality, agency efficiency and responsiveness to the public."

NOTE: 5 CFR 1320.8( b)( 3) requires that each collection of information:

"( 3) informs and provides reasonable notice to the potential persons to whom the collection of information is addressed of: "( I) the reasons the information is planned to be and/ or has been used to further the proper performance of the functions of the agency; "( ii) the way such information is planned to be and/ or has been used to further the proper performance of the functions of the agency; "( iii) an estimate, to the extent practicable, of the average burden of the collection ( together with a request that the public direct to the agency any comments concerning the accuracy of this burden estimate and any suggestions for reducing this burden); "( iv) whether responses to the collection of information are voluntary, required to obtain or retain a benefit ( citing authority), or mandatory ( citing authority); "( v) the nature and extent of confidentiality to be provided, if any ( citing authority); and "( vi) the fact that any agency may not conduct or sponsor, and a person is not required to respond to, a collection of information unless it displays a currently valid OMB control number."

OMB 83 I ( Instructions) 10/ 95


[Federal Register Volume 77, Number 118 (Tuesday, June 19, 2012)]
[Notices]
[Pages 36602-36603]
[FR Doc No: 2012-14864]

=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION

Federal Aviation Administration

Public Notice for Waiver for Aeronautical Land-Use Assurance at
Saline County Regional Airport, Benton, AR

AGENCY: Federal Aviation Administration, DOT.

ACTION: Notice of Intent for Waiver of Aeronautical Land-Use.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) is considering a
proposal to change a portion of the airport from aeronautical use to
nonaeronautical use and to authorize the conversion of the airport
property. The proposal consists of one parcel of land containing a
total of approximately 3.19 acres located on the west side of the
airport at the corner of Hazel Street and 4th Street.
    The parcel was originally acquired as part of a donation to the
County of Saline in 1999. The land comprising this parcel is outside
the forecasted need for aviation development and, thus, is no longer
needed for indirect or direct aeronautical use. The airport wishes to
develop this land for compatible commercial, nonaeronautical use. The
income from the conversion of this parcel will benefit the aviation
community by reinvestment in the airport.
    Approval does not constitute a commitment by the FAA to financially
assist in the conversion of the subject airport property nor a
determination of eligibility for grant-in-aid funding from the FAA. The
disposition of proceeds from the conversion of the airport property
will be in accordance with FAA's Policy and Procedures Concerning the
Use of Airport Revenue, published in the Federal Register on February
16, 1999. In accordance with Section 47107(h) of Title 49, United
States Code, this notice is required to be published in the Federal
Register 30 days before modifying the land-use assurance that requires
the property to be used for an aeronautical purpose.

DATES: Comments must be received on or before July 19, 2012.

ADDRESSES: Send comments on this document to Mr. Edward N. Agnew,
Federal Aviation Administration, Manager, Arkansas/Oklahoma Airports
Development Office, 2601 Meacham Boulevard, Fort Worth, TX 76137.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Mr. Mark Westbrook, Airport Chairman,
Saline County Regional Airport Commission, P.O. Box 1628, Benton, AR
72018, telephone<PHONE_NUMBER>, or Mr.

John E. Michener, Federal Aviation Administration, Arkansas/Oklahoma
Airports Development Program Manager, 2601 Meacham Boulevard, Fort
Worth, TX 76137, telephone<PHONE_NUMBER>, FAX<PHONE_NUMBER>.
Documents reflecting this FAA action may be reviewed at the above
locations.

    Issued in Fort Worth, Texas, on June 7, 2012.
Joseph G. Washington,
Acting Manager, Airports Division, FAA, Southwest Region.
[FR Doc. 2012-14864 Filed 6-18-12; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910-13-P