------------------------------------------------------------------------
8.c.2..................  Runway or landing area selection.
------------------------------------------------------------------------
8.c.3..................  Preset positions (e.g., ramp, over FAF).
------------------------------------------------------------------------
8.c.4..................  Lighting controls.
------------------------------------------------------------------------
8.d....................  Environmental controls.
------------------------------------------------------------------------
8.d.1..................  Temperature.
------------------------------------------------------------------------
8.d.2..................  Climate conditions (e.g., ice, rain).
------------------------------------------------------------------------
8.d.3..................  Wind speed and direction.
------------------------------------------------------------------------
8.e....................  Helicopter system malfunctions.
------------------------------------------------------------------------
8.e.1..................  Insertion/deletion.
------------------------------------------------------------------------
8.e.2..................  Problem clear.
------------------------------------------------------------------------
8.f....................  Locks, Freezes, and Repositioning.
------------------------------------------------------------------------
8.f.1..................  Problem (all) freeze/release.
------------------------------------------------------------------------
8.f.2..................  Position (geographic) freeze/release.
------------------------------------------------------------------------
8.f.3..................  Repositioning (locations, freezes, and
                          releases).
------------------------------------------------------------------------
8.f.4..................  Ground speed control.
------------------------------------------------------------------------

8.g....................  Sound Controls. On/off/adjustment.
------------------------------------------------------------------------
8.h....................  Control Loading System (as applicable) On/off/
                          emergency stop.
------------------------------------------------------------------------
8.i....................  Observer Stations.
------------------------------------------------------------------------
8.i.1..................  Position.
------------------------------------------------------------------------
8.i.2..................  Adjustments.
------------------------------------------------------------------------
* ``Autopilot'' means attitude retention mode of operation.

     Table D3E.--Table of Functions and Subjective Tests Level 5 FTD
------------------------------------------------------------------------
                            QPS requirements
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
       Entry No.                         Operations tasks
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Tasks in this table are subject to evaluation if appropriate for the
 helicopter simulated as indicated in the SOQ Configuration List or for
 a Level 5 FTD. Items not installed or not functional on the FTD and not
 appearing on the SOQ Configuration List, are not required to be listed
 as exceptions on the SOQ.
------------------------------------------------------------------------
1. Preflight Procedures
------------------------------------------------------------------------
1.a....................  Preflight Inspection (Flight Deck Only)
                          switches, indicators, systems, and equipment.
------------------------------------------------------------------------
1.b....................  APU/Engine start and run-up.
------------------------------------------------------------------------
1.b.1..................  Normal start procedures.
------------------------------------------------------------------------
1.b.2..................  Alternate start procedures.
------------------------------------------------------------------------
1.b.3..................  Abnormal starts and shutdowns.
------------------------------------------------------------------------
2. Climb
------------------------------------------------------------------------
2.a....................  Normal.
------------------------------------------------------------------------
3. Inflight Maneuvers
------------------------------------------------------------------------
3.a....................  Performance.
------------------------------------------------------------------------
3.b....................  Turns, Normal.
------------------------------------------------------------------------
4. Instrument Procedures
------------------------------------------------------------------------
4.a....................  Coupled instrument approach maneuvers (as
                          applicable for the systems installed).
------------------------------------------------------------------------
5. Normal and Abnormal Procedures (any phase of flight)
------------------------------------------------------------------------
5.a....................  Normal system operation (installed systems).
------------------------------------------------------------------------
5.b....................  Abnormal/Emergency system operation (installed
                          systems).
------------------------------------------------------------------------
6. Postflight Procedures
------------------------------------------------------------------------
6.a....................  Parking and Securing.
------------------------------------------------------------------------
6.b....................  Engine and systems operation.
------------------------------------------------------------------------
6.c....................  Parking brake operation.
------------------------------------------------------------------------
6.d....................  Rotor brake operation.
------------------------------------------------------------------------
6.e....................  Abnormal/emergency procedures.
------------------------------------------------------------------------
7. Instructor Operating Station (IOS), as appropriate
------------------------------------------------------------------------
7.a....................  Power Switch(es).
------------------------------------------------------------------------
7.b....................  Preset positions (ground; air)
------------------------------------------------------------------------

7.c....................  Helicopter system malfunctions.
------------------------------------------------------------------------
7.c.1..................  Insertion/deletion.
------------------------------------------------------------------------
7.c.2..................  Problem clear.
------------------------------------------------------------------------
7.d....................  Control Loading System (as applicable) On/off/
                          emergency stop.
------------------------------------------------------------------------
7.e....................  Observer Stations.
------------------------------------------------------------------------
7.e.1..................  Position.
------------------------------------------------------------------------
7.e.2..................  Adjustments.
------------------------------------------------------------------------
------------------------------------------------------------------------

     Table D3F.--Table of Functions and Subjective Tests Level 4 FTD
------------------------------------------------------------------------
                            QPS requirements
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
       Entry No.                         Operations tasks
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Tasks in this table are subject to evaluation if appropriate for the
 helicopter simulated as indicated in the SOQ Configuration List or for
 a Level 4 FTD. Items not installed or not functional on the FTD and not
 appearing on the SOQ Configuration List, are not required to be listed
 as exceptions on the SOQ.
------------------------------------------------------------------------
1. Preflight Procedures
------------------------------------------------------------------------
1.a....................  Preflight Inspection (Flight Deck Only)
                          switches, indicators, systems, and equipment.
------------------------------------------------------------------------
1.b....................  APU/Engine start and run-up.
------------------------------------------------------------------------
1.b.1..................  Normal start procedures.
------------------------------------------------------------------------
1.b.2..................  Alternate start procedures.
------------------------------------------------------------------------
1.b.3..................  Abnormal starts and shutdowns.
------------------------------------------------------------------------
2. Normal and Abnormal Procedures (any phase of flight)
------------------------------------------------------------------------
2.a....................  Normal system operation (installed systems).
------------------------------------------------------------------------
2.b....................  Abnormal/Emergency system operation (installed
                          systems).
------------------------------------------------------------------------
3. Postflight Procedures
------------------------------------------------------------------------
3.a....................  Parking and Securing.
------------------------------------------------------------------------
3.b....................  Engine and systems operation.
------------------------------------------------------------------------
3.c....................  Parking brake operation.
------------------------------------------------------------------------
4. Instructor Operating Station (IOS), as appropriate
------------------------------------------------------------------------
4.a....................  Power Switch(es).
------------------------------------------------------------------------
4.b....................  Preset positions (ground; air)
------------------------------------------------------------------------
4.c....................  Helicopter system malfunctions.
------------------------------------------------------------------------
4.c.1..................  Insertion/deletion.
------------------------------------------------------------------------
4.c.2..................  Problem clear.
------------------------------------------------------------------------

Attachment 4 to Appendix D to Part 60--Sample Documents

Table of Contents

Figure D4A Sample Letter, Request for Initial, Upgrade, or
Reinstatement Evaluation
Figure D4B Attachment: FTD Information Form
Figure A4C Sample Letter of Compliance
Figure D4D Sample Qualification Test Guide Cover Page
Figure D4E Sample Statement of Qualification--Certificate
Figure D4F Sample Statement of Qualification--Configuration List
Figure D4G Sample Statement of Qualification--List of Qualified
Tasks
Figure D4H Sample Continuing Qualification Evaluation Requirements
Page
Figure D4I Sample MQTG Index of Effective FTD Directives
BILLING CODE 4910-13-P

[GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] TR09MY08.054

[GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] TR09MY08.055

[GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] TR09MY08.056

[GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] TR09MY08.057

[GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] TR09MY08.058

[GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] TR09MY08.059

[GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] TR09MY08.060

[GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] TR09MY08.061

[GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] TR09MY08.062

[GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] TR09MY08.063

[[Continued on page 26777]]

]

[[pp. 26777-26786]] Flight Simulation Training Device Initial and Continuing
Qualification and Use

[[Continued from page 26776]]

[GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] TR09MY08.064

[GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] TR09MY08.065

[GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] TR09MY08.066

Appendix E to Part 60--Qualification Performance Standards for Quality
Management Systems for Flight Simulation Training Devices

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

Begin QPS Requirements

    a. Not later than May 30, 2010, each current sponsor of an FSTD
must submit to the NSPM a proposed Quality Management System (QMS)
program as described in this appendix. The NSPM will notify the
sponsor of the acceptability of the program, including any required
adjustments. Within 6 months of the notification of acceptability,
the sponsor must implement the program, conduct internal audits,
make required program adjustments as a result of any internal audit,
and schedule the NSPM initial audit.
    b. First-time FSTD sponsors must submit to the NSPM the proposed
QMS program no later than 120 days before the initial FSTD
evaluation. The NSPM will notify the sponsor of the acceptability of
the program, including any required adjustments. Within 6 months of
the notification of acceptability, the sponsor must implement the
program, conduct internal audits, make required program adjustments
as a result of any internal audit, and schedule the NSPM initial
audit.
    c. The Director of Operations for a Part 119 certificate holder,
the Chief Instructor for a Part 141 certificate holder, or the
equivalent for a Part 142 or Flight Engineer School sponsor must
designate a Management Representative (MR) who has the authority to
establish and modify the sponsor's policies, practices, and
procedures regarding the QMS program for the recurring qualification
and the daily use of each FSTD.
    d. The minimum content required for an acceptable QMS is found
in Table E1. The policies, processes, or procedures described in
this table must be maintained in a Quality Manual and will serve as
the basis for the following:
    (1) The sponsor-conducted initial and recurring periodic
assessments;
    (2) The NSPM-conducted initial and recurring periodic
assessments; and
    (3) The continuing surveillance and analysis by the NSPM of the
sponsor's performance and effectiveness in providing a satisfactory
FSTD for use on a regular basis.
    e. The sponsor must conduct assessments of its QMS program in
segments. The segments will be established by the NSPM at the
initial assessment, and the interval for the segment assessments
will be every 6 months. The intervals for the segment assessments
may be extended beyond 6 months as the QMS program matures, but will
not be extended beyond 12 months. The entire QMS program must be
assessed every 24 months.
    f. The periodic assessments conducted by the NSPM will be
conducted at intervals not less than once every 24 months, and
include a comprehensive review of the QMS program. These reviews
will be conducted more frequently if warranted.

End QPS Requirements

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

Begin Information

    g. An example of a segment assessment--At the initial QMS
assessment, the NSPM will divide the QMS program into segments
(e.g., 6 separate segments). There must be an assessment of a
certain number of segments every 6 months (i.e., segments 1 and 2 at
the end of the first 6 month period; segments 3 and 4 at the end of
the second 6 month period (or one year); and segments 5 and 6 at the
end of the third 6 month period (or 18 months). As the program
matures, the interval between assessments may be extended to 12
months (e.g., segments 1, 2, and 3 at the end of the first year; and
segments 4, 5, and 6 at the end of the second year). In both cases,
the entire QMS program is assessed at least every 24 months.
    h. The following materials are presented to assist sponsors in
preparing for an NSPM evaluation of the QMS program. The sample
documents include:
    (1) The NSPM desk assessment tool for initial evaluation of the
required elements of a QMS program.
    (2) The NSPM on-site assessment tool for initial and continuing
evaluation of the required elements of a QMS program.
    (3) An Element Assessment Table that describes the circumstances
that exist to warrant a finding of ``non-compliance,'' or ``non-
conformity''; ``partial compliance,'' or

``partial conformity''; and ``acceptable compliance,'' or
``acceptable conformity.''
    (4) A sample Continuation Sheet for additional comments that may
be added by the sponsor or the NSPM during a QMS evaluation.
    (5) A sample Sponsor Checklist to assist the sponsor in
verifying the elements that comprise the required QMS program.
    (6) A table showing the essential functions, processes, and
procedures that relate to the required QMS components and a cross-
reference to each represented task.
    i. Additional Information.
    (1) In addition to specifically designated QMS evaluations, the
NSPM will evaluate the sponsor's QMS program as part of regularly
scheduled FSTD continuing qualification evaluations and no-notice
FSTD evaluations, focusing in part on the effectiveness and
viability of the QMS program and its contribution to the overall
capability of the FSTD to meet the requirements of this part.
    (2) The sponsor or MR may delegate duties associated with
maintaining the qualification of the FSTD (e.g., corrective and
preventive maintenance, scheduling and conducting tests or
inspections, functional preflight checks) but retain the
responsibility and authority for the day-to-day qualification of the
FSTD. One person may serve as the sponsor or MR for more than one
FSTD, but one FSTD may not have more than one sponsor or MR.
    (3) A QMS program may be applicable to more than one certificate
holder (e.g., part 119 and part 142 or two part 119 certificate
holders) and an MR may work for more than one certificate holder
(e.g., part 119 and part 142 or two part 119 certificate holders) as
long as the sponsor's QMS program requirements and the MR
requirements are met for each certificate holder.
    (4) Standard Measurements for Flight Simulator Quality: A
quality system based on FSTD performance will improve and maintain
training quality. See http://www.faa.gov/safety/programs--
initiatives/aircraft--aviation/nsp/sqms/ for more information on
measuring FSTD performance.
    j. The FAA does not mandate a specific QMS program format, but
an acceptable QMS program should contain the following:.
    (1) A Quality Policy. This is a formal written Quality Policy
Statement that is a commitment by the sponsor outlining what the
Quality System will achieve.
    (2) A MR who has overall authority for monitoring the on-going
qualification of assigned FSTDs to ensure that all FSTD
qualification issues are resolved as required by this part. The MR
should ensure that the QMS program is properly implemented and
maintained, and should:
    (a) Brief the sponsor's management on the qualification
processes;
    (b) Serve as the primary contact point for all matters between
the sponsor and the NSPM regarding the qualification of the assigned
FSTDs; and
    (c) Oversee the day-to-day quality control.
    (3) The system and processes outlined in the QMS should enable
the sponsor to monitor compliance with all applicable regulations
and ensure correct maintenance and performance of the FSTD in
accordance with part 60.
    (4) A QMS program and a statement acknowledging completion of a
periodic review by the MR should include the following:
    (a) A maintenance facility that provides suitable FSTD hardware
and software tests and maintenance capability.
    (b) A recording system in the form of a technical log in which
defects, deferred defects, and development projects are listed,
assigned and reviewed within a specified time period.
    (c) Routine maintenance of the FSTD and performance of the QTG
tests with adequate staffing to cover FSTD operating periods.
    (d) A planned internal assessment schedule and a periodic review
should be used to verify that corrective action was complete and
effective. The assessor should have adequate knowledge of FSTDs and
should be acceptable to the NSPM.
    (5) The MR should receive Quality System training and brief
other personnel on the procedures.

End Information

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

                Table E1.--FSTD Quality Management System
------------------------------------------------------------------------
                                                          Information
     Entry No.                QPS requirement             (reference)
------------------------------------------------------------------------
E1.1...............  A QMS manual that prescribes the  Sec.   60.5(a).
                      policies, processes, or
                      procedures outlined in this
                      table.
------------------------------------------------------------------------
E1.2...............  A policy, process, or procedure   Sec.   60.5(b).
                      specifying how the sponsor will
                      identify deficiencies in the
                      QMS.
------------------------------------------------------------------------
E1.3...............  A policy, process, or procedure   Sec.   60.5(b).
                      specifying how the sponsor will
                      document how the QMS program
                      will be changed to address
                      deficiencies.
------------------------------------------------------------------------
E1.4...............  A policy, process, or procedure   Sec.   60.5(c).
                      specifying how the sponsor will
                      address proposed program
                      changes (for programs that do
                      not meet the minimum
                      requirements as notified by the
                      NSPM) to the NSPM and receive
                      approval prior to their
                      implementation.
------------------------------------------------------------------------
E1.5...............  A policy, process, or procedure   Sec.
                      specifying how the sponsor will   60.7(b)(5).
                      document that at least one FSTD
                      is used within the sponsor's
                      FAA-approved flight training
                      program for the aircraft or set
                      of aircraft at least once
                      within the 12-month period
                      following the initial or
                      upgrade evaluation conducted by
                      the NSPM and at least once
                      within each subsequent 12-month
                      period thereafter.
------------------------------------------------------------------------
E1.6...............  A policy, process, or procedure   Sec.
                      specifying how the sponsor will   60.7(b)(6).
                      document that at least one FSTD
                      is used within the sponsor's
                      FAA-approved flight training
                      program for the aircraft or set
                      of aircraft at least once
                      within the 12-month period
                      following the first continuing
                      qualification evaluation
                      conducted by the NSP and at
                      least once within each
                      subsequent 12-month period
                      thereafter.
------------------------------------------------------------------------
E1.7...............  A policy, process, or procedure   Sec.   60.5(b)(7)
                      specifying how the sponsor will   and Sec.
                      obtain an annual written          60.7(d)(2).
                      statement from a qualified
                      pilot (who has flown the
                      subject aircraft or set of
                      aircraft during the preceding
                      12-month period) that the
                      performance and handling
                      qualities of the subject FSTD
                      represents the subject aircraft
                      or set of aircraft (within the
                      normal operating envelope).
                      Required only if the subject
                      FSTD is not used in the
                      sponsor's FAA-approved flight
                      training program for the
                      aircraft or set of aircraft at
                      least once within the preceding
                      12-month period.
------------------------------------------------------------------------
E1.8...............  A policy, process, or procedure   Sec.
                      specifying how independent        60.9(b)(1).
                      feedback (from persons recently
                      completing training,
                      evaluation, or obtaining flight
                      experience; instructors and
                      check airmen using the FSTD for
                      training, evaluation, or flight
                      experience sessions; and FSTD
                      technicians and maintenance
                      personnel) will be received and
                      addressed by the sponsor
                      regarding the FSTD and its
                      operation.
------------------------------------------------------------------------

E1.9...............  A policy, process, or procedure   Sec.
                      specifying how and where the      60.9(b)(2).
                      FSTD SOQ will be posted, or
                      accessed by an appropriate
                      terminal or display, in or
                      adjacent to the FSTD.
------------------------------------------------------------------------
E1.10..............  A policy, process, or procedure   Sec.   60.9(c)
                      specifying how the sponsor's      and Appendix E,
                      management representative (MR)    paragraph (d).
                      is selected and identified by
                      name to the NSPM.
------------------------------------------------------------------------
E1.11..............  A policy, process, or procedure   Sec.
                      specifying the MR authority and   60.9(c)(2), (3),
                      responsibility for the            and (4).
                      following:
------------------------------------------------------------------------
E1.11.a............  Monitoring the on-going
                      qualification of assigned FSTDs
                      to ensure all matters regarding
                      FSTD qualification are
                      completed as required by this
                      part.
------------------------------------------------------------------------
E1.11.b............  Ensuring that the QMS is
                      properly maintained by
                      overseeing the QMS policies,
                      practices, or procedures and
                      modifying as necessary.
------------------------------------------------------------------------
E1.11.c............  Regularly briefing sponsor's
                      management on the status of the
                      on-going FSTD qualification
                      program and the effectiveness
                      and efficiency of the QMS.
------------------------------------------------------------------------
E1.11.d............  Serving as the primary contact
                      point for all matters between
                      the sponsor and the NSPM
                      regarding the qualification of
                      assigned FSTDs.
------------------------------------------------------------------------
E1.11.e............  Delegating the MR assigned
                      duties to an individual at each
                      of the sponsor's locations, as
                      appropriate.
------------------------------------------------------------------------
E1.12..............  A policy, process, or procedure   Sec.   60.13; QPS
                      specifying how the sponsor        Appendices A, B,
                      will:                             C, and D.
------------------------------------------------------------------------
E1.12.a............  Ensure that the data made
                      available to the NSPM (the
                      validation data package)
                      includes the aircraft
                      manufacturer's flight test data
                      (or other data approved by the
                      NSPM) and all relevant data
                      developed after the type
                      certificate was issued (e.g.,
                      data developed in response to
                      an airworthiness directive) if
                      the data results from a change
                      in performance, handling
                      qualities, functions, or other
                      characteristics of the aircraft
                      that must be considered for
                      flight crewmember training,
                      evaluation, or experience
                      requirements.
------------------------------------------------------------------------
E1.12.b............  Notify the NSPM within 10
                      working days of becoming aware
                      that an addition to or a
                      revision of the flight related
                      data or airplane systems
                      related data is available if
                      this data is used to program or
                      operate a qualified FSTD.
------------------------------------------------------------------------
E1.12.c............  Maintain a liaison with the
                      manufacturer of the aircraft
                      being simulated (or with the
                      holder of the aircraft type
                      certificate for the aircraft
                      being simulated if the
                      manufacturer is no longer in
                      business), and if appropriate,
                      with the person who supplied
                      the aircraft data package for
                      the FFS for the purposes of
                      receiving notification of data
                      package changes.
------------------------------------------------------------------------
E1.13..............  A policy, process, or procedure   Sec.   60.14.
                      specifying how the sponsor will
                      make available all special
                      equipment and qualified
                      personnel needed to conduct
                      tests during initial,
                      continuing qualification, or
                      special evaluations.
------------------------------------------------------------------------
E1.14..............  A policy, process, or procedure   Sec.   60.15(a)-
                      specifying how the sponsor will   (d); Sec.
                      submit to the NSPM a request to   60.15(b); Sec.
                      evaluate the FSTD for initial     60.15(b)(i);
                      qualification at a specific       Sec.
                      level and simultaneously          60.15(b)(ii);
                      request the TPAA forward a        Sec.
                      concurring letter to the NSPM;    60.15(b)(iii).
                      including how the MR will use
                      qualified personnel to confirm
                      the following:
------------------------------------------------------------------------
E1.14.a............  That the performance and
                      handling qualities of the FSTD
                      represent those of the aircraft
                      or set of aircraft within the
                      normal operating envelope.
------------------------------------------------------------------------
E1.14.b............  The FSTD systems and sub-systems
                      (including the simulated
                      aircraft systems) functionally
                      represent those in the aircraft
                      or set of aircraft.
------------------------------------------------------------------------
E1.14.c............  The flight deck represents the
                      configuration of the specific
                      type or aircraft make, model,
                      and series aircraft being
                      simulated, as appropriate.
------------------------------------------------------------------------
E1.15..............  A policy, process, or procedure   Sec.   60.15(e).
                      specifying how the subjective
                      and objective tests are
                      completed at the sponsor's
                      training facility for an
                      initial evaluation.
------------------------------------------------------------------------
E1.16..............  A policy, process, or procedure   Sec.   60.15(h).
                      specifying how the sponsor will
                      update the QTG with the results
                      of the FAA-witnessed tests and
                      demonstrations together with
                      the results of the objective
                      tests and demonstrations after
                      the NSPM completes the
                      evaluation for initial
                      qualification.
------------------------------------------------------------------------

E1.17..............  A policy, process, or procedure   Sec.   60.15(i).
                      specifying how the sponsor will
                      make the MQTG available to the
                      NSPM upon request.
------------------------------------------------------------------------
E1.18..............  A policy, process, or procedure   Sec.   60.16(a);
                      specifying how the sponsor will   Sec.
                      apply to the NSPM for             60.16(a)(1)(i);
                      additional qualification(s) to    and Sec.
                      the SOQ.                          60.16(a)(1)(ii).
------------------------------------------------------------------------
E1.19..............  A policy, process, or procedure   Sec.
                      specifying how the sponsor        60.19(a)(1) QPS
                      completes all required            Appendices A, B,
                      Attachment 2 objective tests      C, or D.
                      each year in a minimum of four
                      evenly spaced inspections as
                      specified in the appropriate
                      QPS.
------------------------------------------------------------------------
E1.20..............  A policy, process, or procedure   Sec.
                      specifying how the sponsor        60.19(a)(2) QPS
                      completes and records a           Appendices A, B,
                      functional preflight check of     C, or D.
                      the FSTD within the preceding
                      24 hours of FSTD use, including
                      a description of the functional
                      preflight.
------------------------------------------------------------------------
E1.21..............  A policy, process, or procedure   Sec.
                      specifying how the sponsor        60.19(b)(2).
                      schedules continuing
                      qualification evaluations with
                      the NSPM.
------------------------------------------------------------------------
E1.22..............  A policy, process, or procedure   Sec.
                      specifying how the sponsor        60.19(b)(5)-(6).
                      ensures that the FSTD has
                      received a continuing
                      qualification evaluation at the
                      interval described in the MQTG.
------------------------------------------------------------------------
E1.23..............  A policy, process, or procedure   Sec.   60.19(c);
                      describing how discrepancies      Sec.
                      are recorded in the FSTD          60.19(c)(2)(i);
                      discrepancy log, including:       Sec.
                                                        60.19(c)(2)(ii).
------------------------------------------------------------------------
E1.23.a............  A description of how the
                      discrepancies are entered and
                      maintained in the log until
                      corrected.
------------------------------------------------------------------------
E1.23.b............  A description of the corrective
                      action taken for each
                      discrepancy, the identity of
                      the individual taking the
                      action, and the date that
                      action is taken.
------------------------------------------------------------------------
E1.24..............  A policy, process, or procedure   Sec.
                      specifying how the discrepancy    60.19(c)(2)(iii)
                      log is kept in a form and         .
                      manner acceptable to the
                      Administrator and kept in or
                      adjacent to the FSTD. (An
                      electronic log that may be
                      accessed by an appropriate
                      terminal or display in or
                      adjacent to the FSTD is
                      satisfactory.).
------------------------------------------------------------------------
E1.25..............  A policy, process, or procedure   Sec.   60.20.
                      that requires each instructor,
                      check airman, or representative
                      of the Administrator conducting
                      training, evaluation, or flight
                      experience, and each person
                      conducting the preflight
                      inspection, who discovers a
                      discrepancy, including any
                      missing, malfunctioning, or
                      inoperative components in the
                      FSTD, to write or cause to be
                      written a description of that
                      discrepancy into the
                      discrepancy log at the end of
                      the FSTD preflight or FSTD use
                      session.
------------------------------------------------------------------------
E1.26..............  A policy, process, or procedure   Sec.   60.21(c).
                      specifying how the sponsor will
                      apply for initial qualification
                      based on the final aircraft
                      data package approved by the
                      aircraft manufacturer if
                      operating an FSTD based on an
                      interim qualification.
------------------------------------------------------------------------
E1.27..............  A policy, process, or procedure   Sec.
                      specifying how the sponsor        60.23(a)(1)-(2).
                      determines whether an FSTD
                      change qualifies as a
                      modification as defined in Sec.
                        60.23.
------------------------------------------------------------------------
E1.28..............  A policy, process, or procedure   Sec.   60.23(b).
                      specifying how the sponsor will
                      ensure the FSTD is modified in
                      accordance with any FSTD
                      Directive regardless of the
                      original qualification basis.
------------------------------------------------------------------------
E1.29..............  A policy, process, or procedure   Sec.
                      specifying how the sponsor will   60.23(c)(1)(i),
                      notify the NSPM and TPAA of       (ii), and (iv).
                      their intent to use a modified
                      FSTD and to ensure that the
                      modified FSTD will not be used
                      prior to:
------------------------------------------------------------------------
E1.29.a............  Twenty-one days since the
                      sponsor notified the NSPM and
                      the TPAA of the proposed
                      modification and the sponsor
                      has not received any response
                      from either the NSPM or the
                      TPAA; or
------------------------------------------------------------------------
E1.29.b............  Twenty-one days since the
                      sponsor notified the NSPM and
                      the TPAA of the proposed
                      modification and one has
                      approved the proposed
                      modification and the other has
                      not responded; or
------------------------------------------------------------------------
E1.29.c............  The FSTD successfully completing
                      any evaluation the NSPM may
                      require in accordance with the
                      standards for an evaluation for
                      initial qualification or any
                      part thereof before the
                      modified FSTD is placed in
                      service.
------------------------------------------------------------------------
E1.30..............  A policy, process, or procedure   Sec.   60.23(d)-
                      specifying how, after an FSTD     (e).
                      modification is approved by the
                      NSPM, the sponsor will:
------------------------------------------------------------------------
E1.30.a............  Post an addendum to the SOQ
                      until as the NSPM issues a
                      permanent, updated SOQ.
------------------------------------------------------------------------
E1.30.b............  Update the MQTG with current
                      objective test results and
                      appropriate objective data for
                      each affected objective test or
                      other MQTG section affected by
                      the modification.
------------------------------------------------------------------------

E1.30.c............  File in the MQTG the requirement
                      from the NSPM to make the
                      modification and the record of
                      the modification completion.
------------------------------------------------------------------------
E1.31..............  A policy, process, or procedure   Sec.   60.25(b)-
                      specifying how the sponsor will   (c), and QPS
                      track the length of time a        Appendices A, B,
                      component has been missing,       C, or D.
                      malfunctioning, or inoperative
                      (MMI), including:
------------------------------------------------------------------------
E1.31.a............  How the sponsor will post a list
                      of MMI components in or
                      adjacent to the FSTD.
------------------------------------------------------------------------
E1.31.b............  How the sponsor will notify the
                      NSPM if the MMI has not been
                      repaired or replaced within 30
                      days.*
------------------------------------------------------------------------
E1.32..............  A policy, process, or procedure   Sec.
                      specifying how the sponsor will   60.27(a)(3).
                      notify the NSPM and how the
                      sponsor will seek
                      requalification of the FSTD if
                      the FSTD is moved and
                      reinstalled in a different
                      location.
------------------------------------------------------------------------
E1.33..............  A policy, process, or procedure   Sec.   60.31.
                      specifying how the sponsor will
                      maintain control of the
                      following: (The sponsor must
                      specify how these records are
                      maintained in plain language
                      form or in coded form; but if
                      the coded form is used, the
                      sponsor must specify how the
                      preservation and retrieval of
                      information will be conducted.).
------------------------------------------------------------------------
E1.33.a............  The MQTG and each amendment.
------------------------------------------------------------------------
E1.33.b............  A record of all FSTD
                      modifications required by this
                      part since the issuance of the
                      original SOQ.
------------------------------------------------------------------------
E1.33.c............  Results of the qualification
                      evaluations (initial and each
                      upgrade) since the issuance of
                      the original SOQ.
------------------------------------------------------------------------
E1.33.d............  Results of the objective tests
                      conducted in accordance with
                      this part for a period of 2
                      years.
------------------------------------------------------------------------
E1.33.e............  Results of the previous three
                      continuing qualification
                      evaluations, or the continuing
                      qualification evaluations from
                      the previous 2 years, whichever
                      covers a longer period.
------------------------------------------------------------------------
E1.33.f............  Comments obtained in accordance
                      with Sec.   60.9(b);
------------------------------------------------------------------------
E1.33.g............  A record of all discrepancies
                      entered in the discrepancy log
                      over the previous 2 years,
                      including the following:
------------------------------------------------------------------------
E1.33.g.1..........  A list of the components or
                      equipment that were or are
                      missing, malfunctioning, or
                      inoperative.
------------------------------------------------------------------------
E1.33.g.2..........  The action taken to correct the
                      discrepancy.
------------------------------------------------------------------------
E1.33.g.3..........  The date the corrective action
                      was taken.
------------------------------------------------------------------------
E1.33.g.4..........  The identity of the person
                      determining that the
                      discrepancy has been corrected.
------------------------------------------------------------------------
* Note: If the sponsor has an approved discrepancy prioritization
  system, this item is satisfied by describing how discrepancies are
  prioritized, what actions are taken, and how the sponsor will notify
  the NSPM if the MMI has not been repaired or replaced within the
  specified timeframe.

Appendix F to Part 60--Definitions and Abbreviations for Flight
Simulation Training Devices

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

Begin Information

1. Some of the definitions presented below are repeated from the
definitions found in 14 CFR part 1, as indicated parenthetically

End Information

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

Begin QPS Requirements

2. Definitions

    1st Segment--the portion of the takeoff profile from liftoff to
gear retraction.
    2nd Segment--the portion of the takeoff profile from after gear
retraction to initial flap/slat retraction.
    3rd Segment--the portion of the takeoff profile after flap/slat
retraction is complete.
    Aircraft Data Package--a combination of the various types of
data used to design, program, manufacture, modify, and test the
FSTD.
    Airspeed--calibrated airspeed unless otherwise specified and
expressed in terms of nautical miles per hour (knots).
    Airport Model--
    Class I. Whether modeling real world or fictional airports (or
landing areas for helicopters), these airport models (or landing
areas for helicopters) are those that meet the requirements of Table
A3B or C3B, found in attachment 2 of Appendix A or C, as
appropriate, are evaluated by the NSPM, and are listed on the SOQ.
    Class II. Whether modeling real world or fictional airports (or
landing areas for helicopters), these airport models (or landing
areas for helicopters) are those models that are in excess of those
used for simulator qualification at a specified level. The FSTD
sponsor is responsible for determining that these models meet the
requirements set out in Table A3C or C3C, found in attachment 2 of
Appendix A or C, as appropriate.
    Class III. This is a special class of airport model (or landing
area for helicopters), used for specific purposes, and includes
models that may be incomplete or inaccurate when viewed without
restriction, but when appropriate limits are applied (e.g., ``valid
for use only in visibility conditions less than \1/2\ statue mile or
RVR2400 feet,'' ``valid for use only for approaches to Runway 22L
and 22R''), those features that may be incomplete or inaccurate may
not be able to be recognized as such by the crewmember being
trained, tested, or checked. Class III airport models used for
training, testing, or checking activities under this Chapter
requires the certificate holder to submit to the TPAA an appropriate
analysis of the skills, knowledge, and abilities necessary for
competent performance of the task(s) in which this particular model
is to be used, and requires TPAA acceptance of each Class III model.
    Altitude--pressure altitude (meters or feet) unless specified
otherwise.
    Angle of Attack--the angle between the airplane longitudinal
axis and the relative

wind vector projected onto the airplane plane of symmetry.
    Automatic Testing--FSTD testing where all stimuli are under
computer control.
    Bank--the airplane attitude with respect to or around the
longitudinal axis, or roll angle (degrees).
    Breakout--the force required at the pilot's primary controls to
achieve initial movement of the control position.
    Certificate Holder--a person issued a certificate under parts
119, 141, or 142 of this chapter or a person holding an approved
course of training for flight engineers in accordance with part 63
of this chapter.
    Closed Loop Testing--a test method where the input stimuli are
generated by controllers that drive the FSTD to follow a pre-defined
target response.
    Computer Controlled Aircraft--an aircraft where all pilot inputs
to the control surfaces are transferred and augmented by computers.
    Confined Area (helicopter operations)--an area where the flight
of the helicopter is limited in some direction by terrain or the
presence of natural or man-made obstructions (e.g., a clearing in
the woods, a city street, or a road bordered by trees or power lines
are regarded as confined areas).
    Control Sweep--movement of the appropriate pilot controller from
neutral to an extreme limit in one direction (Forward, Aft, Right,
or Left), a continuous movement back through neutral to the opposite
extreme position, and then a return to the neutral position.
    Convertible FSTD--an FSTD in which hardware and software can be
changed so that the FSTD becomes a replica of a different model,
usually of the same type aircraft. The same FSTD platform, flight
deck shell, motion system, visual system, computers, and peripheral
equipment can be used in more than one simulation.
    Critical Engine Parameter--the parameter that is the most
accurate measure of propulsive force.
    Deadband--the amount of movement of the input for a system for
which there is no reaction in the output or state of the system
observed.
    Distance--the length of space between two points, expressed in
terms of nautical miles unless otherwise specified.
    Discrepancy--as used in this part, an aspect of the FSTD that is
not correct with respect to the aircraft being simulated. This
includes missing, malfunctioning, or inoperative components that are
required to be present and operate correctly for training,
evaluation, and experience functions to be creditable. It also
includes errors in the documentation used to support the FSTD (e.g.,
MQTG errors, information missing from the MQTG, or required
statements from appropriately qualified personnel).
    Downgrade--a permanent change in the qualification level of an
FSTD to a lower level.
    Driven--a test method where the input stimulus or variable is
positioned by automatic means, usually a computer input.
    Electronic Copy of the MQTG--an electronic copy of the MQTG
provided by an electronic scan presented in a format, acceptable to
the NSPM.
    Electronic Master Qualification Test Guide--an electronic
version of the MQTG (eMQTG), where all objective data obtained from
airplane testing, or another approved source, together with
correlating objective test results obtained from the performance of
the FSTD and a description of the equipment necessary to perform the
evaluation for the initial and the continuing qualification
evaluations is stored, archived, or presented in either reformatted
or digitized electronic format.
    Engine--as used in this part, the appliance or structure that
supplies propulsive force for movement of the aircraft: i.e., The
turbine engine for turbine powered aircraft; the turbine engine and
propeller assembly for turbo-propeller powered aircraft; and the
reciprocating engine and propeller assembly for reciprocating engine
powered aircraft. For purposes of this part, engine failure is the
failure of either the engine or propeller assembly to provide thrust
higher than idle power thrust due to a failure of either the engine
or the propeller assembly.
    Evaluation--with respect to an individual, the checking,
testing, or review associated with flight crewmember qualification,
training, and certification under parts 61, 63, 121, or 135 of this
chapter. With respect to an FSTD, the qualification activities for
the device (e.g., the objective and subjective tests, the
inspections, or the continuing qualification evaluations) associated
with the requirements of this part.
    Fictional Airport--a visual model of an airport that is a
collection of ``non-real world'' terrain, instrument approach
procedures, navigation aids, maps, and visual modeling detail
sufficient to enable completion of an Airline Transport Pilot
Certificate or Type Rating.
    Flight Experience--recency of flight experience for landing
credit purposes.
    Flight Simulation Training Device (FSTD)--a full flight
simulator (FFS) or a flight training device (FTD). (Part 1)
    Flight Test Data--(a subset of objective data) aircraft data
collected by the aircraft manufacturer or other acceptable data
supplier during an aircraft flight test program.
    Flight Training Device (FTD)--a replica of aircraft instruments,
equipment, panels, and controls in an open flight deck area or an
enclosed aircraft flight deck replica. It includes the equipment and
computer programs necessary to represent aircraft (or set of
aircraft) operations in ground and flight conditions having the full
range of capabilities of the systems installed in the device as
described in part 60 of this chapter and the qualification
performance standard (QPS) for a specific FTD qualification level.
(Part 1)
    Free Response--the response of the FSTD after completion of a
control input or disturbance.
    Frozen--a test condition where one or more variables are held
constant with time.
    FSTD Approval--the extent to which an FSTD may be used by a
certificate holder as authorized by the FAA.
    FSTD Directive--a document issued by the FAA to an FSTD sponsor
requiring a modification to the FSTD due to a safety-of-flight issue
and amending the qualification basis for the FSTD.
    FSTD Latency--the additional time for the FSTD to respond to
input that is beyond the response time of the aircraft.
    FSTD Performance--the overall performance of the FSTD, including
aircraft performance (e.g., thrust/drag relationships, climb, range)
and flight and ground handling.
    Full Flight Simulator (FFS)--a replica of a specific type, make,
model, or series aircraft. It includes the equipment and computer
programs necessary to represent aircraft operations in ground and
flight conditions, a visual system providing an out-of-the-flight
deck view, a system that provides cues at least equivalent to those
of a three-degree-of-freedom motion system, and has the full range
of capabilities of the systems installed in the device as described
in part 60 of this chapter and the QPS for a specific FFS
qualification level. (Part 1)
    Gate Clutter--the static and moving ground traffic (e.g., other
airplanes; tugs; power or baggage carts; fueling, catering, or cargo
trucks; pedestrians) presented to pose a potential conflict with the
simulated aircraft during ground operations around the point where
the simulated airplane is to be parked between flights
    Generic Airport Model--a Class III visual model that combines
correct navigation aids for a real world airport with a visual model
that does not depict that same airport.
    Grandfathering--as used in this part, the practice of assigning
a qualification basis for an FSTD based on the period of time during
which a published set of standards governed the requirements for the
initial and continuing qualification of FSTDs. Each FSTD
manufactured during this specified period of time is
``grandfathered'' or held to the standards that were in effect
during that time period. The grandfathered standards remain
applicable to each FSTD manufactured during the stated time period
regardless of any subsequent modification to those standards and
regardless of the sponsor, as long as the FSTD remains qualified or
is maintained in a non-qualified status in accordance with the
specific requirements and time periods prescribed in this part.
    Gross Weight--For objective test purposes:
    Basic Operating Weight (BOW)--the empty weight of the aircraft
plus the weight of the following: Normal oil quantity; lavatory
servicing fluid; potable water; required crewmembers and their
baggage; and emergency equipment.
    Light Gross Weight--a weight chosen by the sponsor or data
provider that is not more than 120% of the BOW of the aircraft being
simulated or the minimum practical operating weight of the test
aircraft.
    Medium Gross Weight--a weight chosen by the sponsor or data
provider that is within 10% of the average of the numerical values
of the BOW and the maximum certificated gross weight.
    Near Maximum Gross Weight--a weight chosen by the sponsor or
data provider that is not less than the BOW of the aircraft being
simulated plus 80% of the difference between the maximum
certificated gross weight (either takeoff weight or landing

weight, as appropriate for the test) and the BOW.
    Ground Effect--the change in aerodynamic characteristics due to
of the change in the airflow past the aircraft caused by the
proximity of the earth's surface to the airplane.
    Hands Off--a test maneuver conducted without pilot control
inputs.
    Hands On--a test maneuver conducted with pilot control inputs as
required.
    Heave--FSTD movement with respect to or along the vertical axis.
    Height--the height above ground level (or AGL) expressed in
meters or feet.
    ``In Use'' Runway--as used in this part, the runway that is
currently selected, able to be used for takeoffs and landings, and
has the surface lighting and markings required by this part. Also
known as the ``active'' runway.
    Integrated Testing--testing of the FSTD so that all aircraft
system models are active and contribute appropriately to the
results. With integrated testing, none of the models used are
substituted with models or other algorithms intended for testing
only.
    Irreversible Control System--a control system where movement of
the control surface will not backdrive the pilot's control on the
flight deck.
    Locked--a test condition where one or more variables are held
constant with time.
    Manual Testing--FSTD testing conducted without computer inputs
except for initial setup, and all modules of the simulation are
active.
    Master Qualification Test Guide (MQTG)--the FAA-approved
Qualification Test Guide with the addition of the FAA-witnessed test
results, applicable to each individual FSTD.
    Medium--the normal operational weight for a given flight
segment.
    National Simulator Program Manager (NSPM)--the FAA manager
responsible for the overall administration and direction of the
National Simulator Program (NSP), or a person approved by that FAA
manager.
    Near Limiting Performance--the performance level the operating
engine must be required to achieve to have sufficient power to land
a helicopter after experiencing a single engine failure during
takeoff of a multiengine helicopter. The operating engine must be
required to operate within at least 5 percent of the maximum RPM or
temperature limits of the gas turbine or power turbine, or operate
within at least 5 percent of the maximum drive train torque limits.
Near limiting performance is based on the existing combination of
density altitude, temperature, and helicopter gross weight.
    Nominal--the normal operating configuration, atmospheric
conditions, and flight parameters for the specified flight segment.
    Non-Normal Control--a term used in reference to Computer
Controlled Aircraft. It is the state where one or more of the
intended control, augmentation, or protection functions are not
fully working. Note: Specific terms such as ALTERNATE, DIRECT,
SECONDARY, or BACKUP may be used to define an actual level of
degradation.
    Normal Control--a term used in reference to Computer Controlled
Aircraft. It is the state where the intended control, augmentation,
and protection functions are fully working.
    Objective Data--quantitative data, acceptable to the NSPM, used
to evaluate the FSTD.
    Objective Test--a quantitative measurement and evaluation of
FSTD performance.
    Pitch--the airplane attitude with respect to, or around, the
lateral axis expressed in degrees.
    Power Lever Angle (PLA)--the angle of the pilot's primary engine
control lever(s) on the flight deck. This may also be referred to as
THROTTLE or POWER LEVER.
    Predicted Data--estimations or extrapolations of existing flight
test data or data from other simulation models using engineering
analyses, engineering simulations, design data, or wind tunnel data.
    Protection Functions--systems functions designed to protect an
airplane from exceeding its flight maneuver limitations.
    Pulse Input--a step input to a control followed by an immediate
return to the initial position.
    Qualification Level--the categorization of an FSTD established
by the NSPM based on the FSTDs demonstrated technical and
operational capabilities as prescribed in this part.
    Qualification Performance Standard (QPS)--the collection of
procedures and criteria used when conducting objective and
subjective tests, to establish FSTD qualification levels. The QPS
are published in the appendices to this part, as follows: Appendix
A, for Airplane Simulators; Appendix B, for Airplane Flight Training
Devices; Appendix C, for Helicopter Simulators; Appendix D, for
Helicopter Flight Training Devices; Appendix E, for Quality
Management Systems for Flight Simulation Training Devices; and
Appendix F, for Definitions and Abbreviations for Flight Simulation
Training Devices.
    Qualification Test Guide (QTG)--the primary reference document
used for evaluating an aircraft FSTD. It contains test results,
statements of compliance and capability, the configuration of the
aircraft simulated, and other information for the evaluator to
assess the FSTD against the applicable regulatory criteria.
    Quality Management System (QMS)--a flight simulation quality-
systems that can be used for external quality-assurance purposes. It
is designed to identify the processes needed, determine the sequence
and interaction of the processes, determine criteria and methods
required to ensure the effective operation and control of the
processes, ensure the availability of information necessary to
support the operation and monitoring of the processes, measure,
monitor, and analyze the processes, and implement the actions
necessary to achieve planned results.
    Real-World Airport--as used in this part in reference to airport
visual models, a computer generated visual depiction of an existing
airport.
    Representative--when used as an adjective in this part, typical,
demonstrative, or characteristic of, the feature being described.
For example, ``representative sampling of tests'' means a sub-set of
the complete set of all tests such that the sample includes one or
more of the tests in each of the major categories, the results of
which provide the evaluator with an overall understanding of the
performance and handling characteristics of the FSTD.
    Reversible Control System--a control system in which movement of
the control surface will backdrive the pilot's control on the flight
deck.
    Roll--the airplane attitude with respect to, or around, the
longitudinal axis expressed in degrees.
    Set of Aircraft--aircraft that share similar handling and
operating characteristics, similar operating envelopes, and have the
same number and type of engines or powerplants.
    Sideslip Angle--the angle between the relative wind vector and
the airplane plane of symmetry. (Note: this definition replaces the
current definition of ``sideslip.'')
    Simulation Quality Management System (SQMS)--the elements of a
quality management system for FSTD continuing qualification.
    Snapshot--a presentation of one or more variables at a given
instant of time.
    Special Evaluation--an evaluation of the FSTD for purposes other
than initial, upgrade, or continuing qualification. Circumstances
that may require a special evaluation include movement of the FSTD
to a different location, or an update to FSTD software or hardware
that might affect performance or flying qualities.
    Sponsor--a certificate holder who seeks or maintains FSTD
qualification and is responsible for the prescribed actions as
prescribed in this part and the QPS for the appropriate FSTD and
qualification level.
    Statement of Compliance and Capability (SOC)--a declaration that
a specific requirement has been met and explaining how the
requirement was met (e.g., gear modeling approach, coefficient of
friction sources). The SOC must also describe the capability of the
FSTD to meet the requirement, including references to sources of
information for showing compliance, rationale to explain how the
referenced material is used, mathematical equations and parameter
values used, and conclusions reached.
    Step Input--an abrupt control input held at a constant value.
    Subjective Test--a qualitative assessment of the performance and
operation of the FSTD.
    Surge--FSTD movement with respect to or along the longitudinal
axis.
    Sway--FSTD movement with respect to or along the lateral axis.
    Tf--Total time of the flare maneuver.
    Ti--Total time from initial throttle movement until a 10%
response of a critical engine parameter.
    Tt--Total time from initial throttle movement to an increase of
90% of go around power or a decrease of 90% from maximum take-off
power.
    Time History--a presentation of the change of a variable with
respect to time.

    Training Program Approval Authority (TPAA)--a person authorized
by the Administrator to approve the aircraft flight training program
in which the FSTD will be used.
    Training Restriction--a temporary condition where an FSTD with
missing, malfunctioning, or inoperative (MMI) components may
continue to be used at the qualification level indicated on its SOQ,
but restricted from completing the tasks for which the correct
function of the MMI component is required.
    Transport Delay or ``Throughput''--the total FSTD system
processing time required for an input signal from a pilot primary
flight control until motion system, visual system, or instrument
response. It is the overall time delay incurred from signal input to
output response. It does not include the characteristic delay of the
airplane simulated.
    Update--an improvement to or modernization of the quality or the
accuracy of the FSTD without affecting the qualification level of
the FSTD.
    Upgrade--the improvement or enhancement of an FSTD for the
purpose of achieving a higher qualification level.
    Validation Data--objective data used to determine if the FSTD
performance is within the tolerances prescribed in the QPS.
    Validation Test--an objective test where FSTD parameters are
compared to the relevant validation data to ensure that the FSTD
performance is within the tolerances prescribed in the QPS.
    Visual Data Base--a display that may include one or more airport
models.
    Visual System Response Time--the interval from a control input
to the completion of the visual display scan of the first video
field containing the resulting different information.
    Yaw--the airplane attitude with respect to, or around, the
vertical axis expressed in degrees.
    3. Abbreviations
AFM Airplane Flight Manual.
AGL Above Ground Level (meters or feet).
AOA Angle of Attack (degrees).
APD Aircrew Program Designee.
CCA Computer Controlled Aircraft.
cd/m2 candela/meter2, 3.4263 candela/m2 = 1
ft-Lambert.
CFR Code of Federal Regulations.
cm(s) centimeter, centimeters.
daN decaNewtons, one (1) decaNewton = 2.27 pounds.
deg(s) degree, degrees.
DOF Degrees-of-freedom.
eMQTG Electronic Master Qualification Test Guide.
EPR Engine Pressure Ratio.
FAA Federal Aviation Administration (U.S.).
FATO Final Approach and Take Off area
fpm feet per minute.
ft foot/feet, 1 foot = 0.304801 meters.
ft-Lambert foot-Lambert, 1 ft-Lambert = 3.4263 candela/
m2.
g Acceleration due to Gravity (meters or feet/sec2); 1g =
9.81 m/sec2 or 32.2 feet/sec2.
G/S Glideslope.
IATA International Airline Transport Association.
ICAO International Civil Aviation Organization.
IGE In ground effect.
ILS Instrument Landing System.
IOS Instructor Operating Station.
IQTG International Qualification Test Guide.
km Kilometers; 1 km = 0.62137 Statute Miles.
kPa KiloPascal (Kilo Newton/Meters2). 1 psi = 6.89476 kPa.
kts Knots calibrated airspeed unless otherwise specified, 1 knot =
0.5148 m/sec or 1.689 ft/sec.
lb(s) pound(s), one (1) pound = 0.44 decaNewton.
LDP Landing decision point.
MQTG Master Qualification Test Guide
M,m Meters, 1 Meter = 3.28083 feet.
Min(s) Minute, minutes.
MLG Main Landing Gear.
Mpa MegaPascals (1 psi = 6894.76 pascals).
ms millisecond(s).
N NORMAL CONTROL Used in reference to Computer Controlled Aircraft.
nm Nautical Mile(s) 1 Nautical Mile = 6,080 feet.
NN NON-NORMAL CONTROL Used in reference to Computer Controlled
Aircraft.
N1 Low Pressure Rotor revolutions per minute, expressed in percent
of maximum.
N2 High Pressure Rotor revolutions per minute, expressed in percent
of maximum.
N3 High Pressure Rotor revolutions per minute, expressed in percent
of maximum.
NSPM National Simulator Program Manager.
NWA Nosewheel Angle (degrees).
OGE Out of ground effect.
PAPI Precision Approach Path Indicator System.
Pf Impact or Feel Pressure, often expressed as ``q.''
PLA Power Lever Angle.
PLF Power for Level Flight.
psi pounds per square inch.
QPS Qualification Performance Standard.
QTG Qualification Test Guide.
RAE Royal Aerospace Establishment.
R/C Rate of Climb (meters/sec or feet/min).
R/D Rate of Descent (meters/sec or feet/min).
REIL Runway End Identifier Lights.
RVR Runway Visual Range (meters or feet).
s second(s).
sec(s) second, seconds.
sm Statute Mile(s) 1 Statute Mile = 5,280 feet.
SMGCS Surface Movement Guidance and Control System.
SOC Statement of Compliance and Capability.
SOQ Statement of Qualification.
TIR Type Inspection Report.
TLOF Touchdown and Loft Off area.
T/O Takeoff.
VASI Visual Approach Slope Indicator System.
VGS Visual Ground Segment.
V1 Decision speed.
V2 Takeoff safety speed.
Vmc Minimum Control Speed.
Vmca Minimum Control Speed in the air.
Vmcg Minimum Control Speed on the ground.
Vmcl Minimum Control Speed--Landing.
Vmu The speed at which the last main landing gear leaves the ground.
VR Rotate Speed.
VS Stall Speed or minimum speed in the stall.
WAT Weight, Altitude, Temperature.

End QPS Requirements

    Issued in Washington, DC, on April 17, 2008.
John M. Allen,
Acting Director Flight Standards Service.
[FR Doc. 08-1183 Filed 4-30-08; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4910-13-P


[Federal Register: November 14, 2008 (Volume 73, Number 221)]
[Notices]
[Page 67546-67548]
[DOCID:fr14no08-122]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF LABOR

Occupational Safety and Health Administration

[Docket No. OSHA-2008-0041]

OSHA Strategic Partnership Program for Worker Safety and Health
(OSPP)

AGENCY: Occupational Safety and Health Administration (OSHA), Labor.

ACTION: Request for public comment.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: OSHA solicits public comment concerning its proposal to extend
the Office of Management Budget's (OMB) approval of the information
collection requirements specified in the OSHA Strategic Partnership
Program for Worker Safety and Health (OSPP).

DATES: Comments must be submitted (postmarked, sent, or received) by
January 13, 2009.

ADDRESSES:
    Electronically: You may submit comments and attachments
electronically at http://www.regulations.gov, which is the Federal
eRulemaking Portal. Follow the instructions online for submitting
comments.
    Facsimile: If your comments, including attachments, are not longer
than 10 pages you may fax them to the OSHA Docket Office at (202) 693-
1648.
    Mail, hand delivery, express mail, messenger, or courier service:
When using this method, you must submit three copies of your comments
and attachments to the OSHA Docket Office, Docket No. OSHA-2008-0041,
U.S. Department of Labor, Occupational Safety and Health
Administration, Room N-2625, 200 Constitution Avenue, NW., Washington,
DC 20210. Deliveries (hand, express mail, messenger, and courier
service) are accepted during the Department of Labor's and Docket
Office's normal business hours, 8:15 a.m. to 4:45 p.m., e.t.
    Instructions: All submissions must include the Agency name and OSHA
docket number for the Information Collection Request (ICR) (OSHA-2008-
0041). All documents, including any personal information you provide,
are placed in the public docket without change, and may be made
available online at http://www.regulations.gov. For further information
on submitting comments see the ``Public Participation'' heading in the
section of this notice titled SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION.
    Docket: To read or download comments or other material in the
docket, go to http://www.regulations.gov or the OSHA Docket Office at
the address above. All documents in the docket (including this Federal
Register notice) are listed in the http://www.regulations.gov index;
however, some information (e.g., copyrighted material) is not publicly
available to read or download through the Web site. All submissions,
including copyrighted material, are available for inspection and
copying at the OSHA Docket Office. You may also contact Cathy Oliver at
the address below to obtain a copy of the ICR.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Cathy Oliver, Office of Partnerships
and Recognition, Directorate of Cooperative and State Programs,
Occupational Safety and Health Administration, U.S. Department of
Labor, Room N-3700, 200 Constitution Avenue, NW., Washington, DC 20210,
(202) 693-2208.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

I. Background

    The Department of Labor, as part of its continuing effort to reduce
paperwork and respondent (i.e., employer) burden, conducts a
preclearance consultation program to provide the public with an
opportunity to comment on proposed and continuing information
collection requirements in accordance with the Paperwork Reduction Act
of 1995 (44 U.S.C. 3506(c)(2)(A)). This program ensures that
information is in the desired format, reporting burden (time and costs)
is minimal, collection instruments are clearly understood, and OSHA's
estimate of the information collection burden is accurate. The
Occupational Safety and Health Act of 1970 (the OSH Act) (29 U.S.C. 651
et seq.) authorizes information collection by employers as necessary or
appropriate for enforcement of the OSH Act or for developing
information regarding the causes and prevention of occupational
injuries, illnesses, and accidents (29 U.S.C. 657). The OSH Act also
requires that OSHA obtain such information with minimum burden upon
employers, especially those operating small businesses, and to reduce
to the maximum extent feasible unnecessary duplication of efforts in
obtaining information (29 U.S.C. 657).
    The OSPP allows OSHA to enter into an extended, voluntary,
cooperative relationship with groups of employers, employees, and
representatives (sometimes including other stakeholders, and sometimes
involving only one employer) to encourage, assist and recognize their
efforts to eliminate serious hazards and to achieve a high level of
employee safety and health that goes beyond what historically has been
achieved through traditional enforcement methods. Each OSHA Strategic
Partnership (OSP) determines which information will be needed, selects
the best collection method, and specifies how the information will be
used. At a minimum, each OSP must identify baseline illness and injury
data corresponding to all summary line items on the OSHA 300 logs, and
must track changes at either the worksite level or participant-
aggregate level. An OSP may also include other measures of success,
such as training activity, self inspections, and/or workers'
compensation data. In this regard, the information collection
requirements for the OSPP is used by the Agency to gauge the
effectiveness of its programs, identify needed improvements, and ensure
that its resources are being used to good and effective purposes.

II. Special Issues for Comment

    OSHA has a particular interest in comments on the following issues:
     Whether the proposed information collection requirements
are necessary for the proper performance of the Agency's functions,
including whether the information is useful;
     The accuracy of OSHA's estimate of the burden (time and
costs) of the information collection requirements, including the
validity of the methodology and assumptions used;
     The quality, utility, and clarity of the information
collected; and
     Ways to minimize the burden on employers who must comply;
for example, by using automated or other technological information
collection and transmission techniques.

III. Proposed Actions

    OSHA is proposing to extend the information collection requirements
contained in the Strategic Partnership Program for Worker Safety and
Health (OSPP) (5 CFR 1320.5). The Agency is requesting to increase its
current burden hour total from 57,923 to 361,416 hours for a total
increase of 303,493 hours. The increase is a result of a growth in the
number of partnerships and in accounting burden hours for individual
employers in partnerships. The Agency will summarize the comments
submitted in response to this notice and will include this summary in
the request to OMB.
    Type of Review: Extension of a currently approved collection.
    Title: OSHA Strategic Partnership Program for Worker Safety and
Health (OSPP).
    OMB Number: 1218-0244.
    Affected Public: Business or other for-profits; Federal Government;
State, Local or Tribal Government.
    Number of Respondents: 32,586.
    Frequency: On occasion.
    Average Time Per Response: Eleven (11) hours to develop the
partnership requirements, draft agreement language, and conduct an
internal review process.
    Estimated Total Burden Hours: 361,416.
    Estimated Cost (Operation and Maintenance): $0.

IV. Public Participation--Submission of Comments on This Notice and
Internet Access to Comments and Submissions

    You may submit comments in response to this document as follows:
(1) Electronically at http://www.regulations.gov, which is the Federal
eRulemaking Portal; (2) by facsimile (FAX); or (3) by hard copy. All
comments, attachments, and other material must identify the Agency name
and the OSHA docket number for the ICR (Docket No. OSHA-2008-0041). You
may supplement electronic submissions by uploading document files
electronically. If you wish to mail additional materials in reference
to an electronic or facsimile submission, you must submit them to the
OSHA Docket Office (see the section of this notice titled ADDRESSES).
The additional materials must clearly identify your electronic comments
by your name, date, and the docket number so the Agency can attach them
to your comments.
    Because of security procedures, the use of regular mail may cause a
significant delay in the receipt of comments. For information about
security procedures concerning the delivery of materials by hand,
express delivery, messenger, or courier service, please contact the
OSHA Docket Office at<PHONE_NUMBER> (TTY<PHONE_NUMBER>).
    Comments and submissions are posted without change at http://
www.regulations.gov. Therefore, OSHA cautions commenters about
submitting personal information such as social security numbers and
date of birth. Although all submissions are listed in the http://
www.regulations.gov index, some information (e.g., copyrighted
material) is not publicly available to read or download through this
Web site. All submissions, including copyrighted material, are
available for inspection and copying at the OSHA Docket Office.
Information on using the http://www.regulations.gov Web site to submit
comments and access the docket is available at the Web site's ``User
Tips'' link. Contact the OSHA Docket Office for information about
materials not available through the Web site, and for assistance in
using the Internet to locate docket submissions.

V. Authority and Signature

    Edwin G. Foulke, Jr., Assistant Secretary of Labor for Occupational
Safety and Health, directed the preparation of this notice. The
authority for this notice is the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 (44
U.S.C. 3506 et seq.) and Secretary of Labor's Order No. 5-2007 (72 FR
31159).

    Signed at Washington, DC, on November 6, 2008.
Edwin G. Foulke, Jr.,
Assistant Secretary of Labor for Occupational Safety and Health.
 [FR Doc. E8-26981 Filed 11-13-08; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4510-26-P


believes that the MSRB has adequately addressed the comment on the
application of the Interpretive Notice to private placement agents by
providing clarification with respect to the application of Rule G-17
and the Interpretive Notice to private placement agents.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \122\ See SIFMA Letter II.
    \123\ In Response Letter II, the MSRB also reminded dealers to
remain cognizant of the fact that the circumstances under which a
true private placement may arise in the municipal market are quite
constrained.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    One commenter urged further consideration of the costs of the
disclosures and weighing of the costs against the potential
benefits.\124\ In Response Letter II, the MSRB noted its disagreement
that it did not weigh the costs and benefits. The MSRB noted that the
Interpretive Notice ``recognizes that there is significant variability
of size, sophistication and frequency of accessing the market among
issuers across the country, and many of the disclosures required under
the Proposal can be tailored, and in some cases are not required at
all, based on a number of relevant factors set out in the Proposal.''
Further, the MSRB stated that although it recognizes that some
underwriters may bear up-front costs in creating basic frameworks for
the required disclosures for the various types of products they may
offer their issuer clients, the on-going burden should thereafter be
considerably reduced and the preparation of written disclosures would
become an inter-related component of the necessary documentation of the
transaction.\125\ In Response Letter II, the MSRB also noted that
providing more information to issuers would empower and provide
considerable benefits to issuers.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \124\ See SIFMA Letter I; SIFMA Letter II; and SIFMA Letter III.
Other commenters stated their belief that the proposed disclosures
will not cause undue costs or burdens to underwriters. See PFM
Letter II and GFOA Letter III.
    \125\ See also Response Letter III.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    In addition, in Response Letter III, the MSRB noted that the
disclosures with respect to the role of the underwriter and actual or
potential conflicts of interest could consist of the language provided
in the Interpretive Notice, which would lessen the potential costs
associated with the disclosures. Moreover, the MSRB stated that
disclosures with respect to the risks of a proposed financing would not
burden underwriters greatly as generally only complex financings would
require such disclosures. For routine financings, the MSRB stated that
disclosures would only be required if the issuer personnel lacked
knowledge or expertise.
    In Response Letter III, the MSRB emphasized its belief regarding
the benefits of the proposed disclosures. First, the MSRB stated that
municipal securities offerings that result from self-interested advice,
conflicting interest or undisclosed payments to third-parties are more
likely to encounter issues at a later date, which could cause harm to
investors and issuers. Thus, the MSRB believes that the proposed
disclosures would help address such practices. Second, the MSRB stated
that municipal issuers have entered into complex financings that later
created serious risks to the municipalities and that the burden on
underwriters of the required disclosures would be outweighed by the
benefits to issuers in avoiding similar situations in the future.
    The Commission believes that the MSRB has adequately addressed
comments regarding the costs resulting from the Interpretive
Notice.\126\ The Commission appreciates that the proposed rule change
will impose costs upon underwriters, but believes such costs are
justified by the benefits that will result from the Interpretive
Notice.\127\ As noted above, the Commission believes that the required
disclosures will benefit municipal issuers by providing them with
valuable information with which to evaluate, among other things, the
potential risks of engaging a particular underwriter and entering into
a recommended financing structure. The Commission also believes that
the disclosures would benefit investors and the public interest.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \126\ In approving this proposed rule change, the Commission has
also considered whether the proposed change will promote efficiency,
competition, and capital formation. See 15 U.S.C. 78c(f). While none
of the commenters specifically commented on efficiency, competition,
and capital formation, some of the comments raised concerns about
the burdens imposed by the proposed rule change and possible effects
on certain transactions. As discussed above, the additional
disclosures required by the proposed rule change are intended to
deter fraud, inform issuers about potential conflicts of interest,
and help to ensure that municipal entities engage in financings
appropriate to their needs.
    \127\ See Response Letter III.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    As noted by the MSRB in Response Letter III, there may be
additional up-front costs in creating basic frameworks for the
disclosures, but many of the disclosures could be standardized. The
Commission believes that such standardization will help reduce the
ongoing burden of preparing the written disclosures.\128\ In addition,
to help further reduce the potential costs associated with the proposed
disclosures, the Commission notes that the Interpretive Notice contains
language that underwriters may incorporate into their written
disclosures, such as language in the Interpretive Notice regarding the
underwriter's role and the conflict of interest caused by contingent
fee compensation.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \128\ The MSRB stated that standardized disclosures could be
developed to describe common material financial risks and
characteristics that would then only need to be modified in the
event of variants in the structures proposed by the underwriter.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    Further, as noted above, in response to comments, the MSRB made
modifications to the Interpretive Notice, as originally proposed, which
it believes will help reduce the cost of compliance.\129\ For example,
under the amended Interpretive Notice, an underwriter that recommends a
complex municipal securities financing to an issuer must disclose the
material financial characteristics of such complex municipal securities
financing, as well as the material financial risks of such financing
that are known to the underwriter and reasonably foreseeable at the
time of the disclosure, as opposed to all material risks and
characteristics of the financing.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \129\ See Response Letter III.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

IV. General Commission Findings

    As noted above, the Commission has carefully considered the
proposed rule change, as modified by Amendment No. 2, the comment
letters received, and the MSRB's responses. For the reasons discussed
above, the Commission finds that the proposed rule change, as modified
by Amendment No. 2, is consistent with the requirements of the Act and
the rules and regulations thereunder applicable to the MSRB.
Specifically, the Commission finds that the proposed rule change is
consistent with the provisions of Section 15B(b)(2)(C) of the Act.\130\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \130\ 15 U.S.C. 78o-4(b)(2)(C).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    The Commission believes that, in general, the MSRB has adequately
responded to the comments received on the proposed rule change. The
Commission also notes that the MSRB has stated that it will monitor
disclosure practices under the Interpretive Notice and will engage in a
dialogue with industry participants and the Commission to determine
whether sufficient improvements have occurred in the flow of the
disclosures to decision-making personnel of issuers or whether
additional steps should be

taken.\131\ The MSRB also stated that it will monitor matters relating
to the timing of disclosures in order to determine whether any further
action in this area is merited.\132\ In addition, the MSRB stated that
it will monitor whether the proposal has achieved the effect of
providing issuers with adequate information about actual or potential
material conflicts of interest and whether the amount of third-party
payments or other additional information should be required.\133\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \131\ See Response Letter II and Response Letter IV.
    \132\ See Response Letter II.
    \133\ See Response Letter IV.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

V. Conclusion

    It is therefore ordered, pursuant to Section 19(b)(2) of the
Act,\134\ that the proposed rule change (SR-MSRB-2011-09), as modified
by Amendment No. 2, be, and it hereby is, approved.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \134\ 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(2).

    By the Commission.
Elizabeth M. Murphy,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2012-11268 Filed 5-9-12; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 8011-01-P