Comment Info: =================

General Comment:Dear Mr. Zeller:

I am writing as an individual consumer to request an extension of the comment period for the Food and Drug Administration's ("FDA") Proposed Rule Deeming Tobacco Products to be Subject to the Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act, as amended by the Family Smoking and Prevention and Tobacco Control Act (the "Proposed Rule") published at 79 Fed. Reg. 23,142 and Federal Register No. 2014-09491. On behalf of myself, I am requesting that the comment period for the Proposed Rule be extended by the FDA for an additional 105 days, from its current 75-day period, to 180 days.

The Proposed Rule raises a number of significant issues and questions that are important and relevant to me, as a consumer of products that are proposed for regulation under the Proposed Rule. The Proposed Rule asks about a hundred different questions I might want to respond to. I want to provide my thoughts and comments on many of these issues, but my time to devote to researching and providing thoughtful comments on these important questions is limited. I have already spent many hours researching and dissecting these issues, but they take time. I know that the FDA took many years to even come up with the Proposed Rule, so I do not think it is at all unreasonable to allow the public a mere six months to comment on it. This is our only opportunity, as consumers, to provide our feedback.

I feel very strongly about e-cigarettes as an alternative to combustible cigarettes. Quite simply, I firmly believe that they are saving my life. I wish to provide you with my personal story, as well as science- and evidence-based responses to your questions so that you can take my comment into account. I realize that the FDA has the authority under 21 CFR 10.40 to extend this time frame and that the FDA has exercised this authority on numerous occasions in the past. I would therefore ask that you do so here, so that all stakeholders have the opportunity to provide their comments on this proposed regulation.

I also feel very strongly about the businesses that have been generated from sales of the Personal Vaporizers and Eliquid that are also being used to save peoples lives. If the Regulations go through as they are, It will crush most small businesses in the industry and will only allow the few that have the financial resources to provide the high costs of being regulated so heavily.

I appreciate your consideration of my request and am happy to discuss this issue with you further.


[Federal Register Volume 80, Number 191 (Friday, October 2, 2015)]
[Notices]
[Pages 59850-59851]
[FR Doc No: 2015-25067]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION

National Highway Traffic Safety Administration

[Docket No. NHTSA-2015-0078; Notice 1]

Bridgestone Americas Tire Operations, LLC, Receipt of Petition
for Decision of Inconsequential Noncompliance

AGENCY: National Highway Traffic Safety Administration (NHTSA),
Department of Transportation (DOT).

ACTION: Receipt of Petition.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: Bridgestone Americas Tire Operations, LLC (BATO), has
determined that certain Bridgestone bus tires do not fully comply with
paragraph S6.5(e) of Federal Motor Vehicle Safety Standard (FMVSS) No.
119, New Pneumatic Tires for Motor Vehicles with a GVWR of more than
4,536 kilograms (10,000 pounds) and Motorcycles. BATO has filed an
appropriate report dated July 7, 2015, pursuant to 49 CFR part 573,
Defect and Noncompliance Responsibility and Reports.

DATES: The closing date for comments on the petition is November 2,
2015.

ADDRESSES: Interested persons are invited to submit written data,
views, and arguments on this petition. Comments must refer to the
docket and notice number cited at the beginning of this notice and
submitted by any of the following methods:
     Mail: Send comments by mail addressed to: U.S. Department
of Transportation, Docket Operations, M-30, West Building Ground Floor,
Room W12-140, 1200 New Jersey Avenue SE., Washington, DC 20590.
     Hand Deliver: Deliver comments by hand to: U.S. Department
of Transportation, Docket Operations, M-30, West Building Ground Floor,
Room W12-140, 1200 New Jersey Avenue SE., Washington, DC 20590. The
Docket Section is open on weekdays from 10 a.m. to 5 p.m. except
Federal Holidays.
     Electronically: Submit comments electronically by: Logging
onto the Federal Docket Management System (FDMS) Web site at http://www.regulations.gov/. Follow the online instructions for submitting
comments. Comments may also be faxed to<PHONE_NUMBER>.
    Comments must be written in the English language, and be no greater
than 15 pages in length, although there is no limit to the length of
necessary attachments to the comments. If comments are submitted in
hard copy form, please ensure that two copies are provided. If you wish
to receive confirmation that your comments were

received, please enclose a stamped, self-addressed postcard with the
comments. Note that all comments received will be posted without change
to http://www.regulations.gov, including any personal information
provided.
    Documents submitted to a docket may be viewed by anyone at the
address and times given above. The documents may also be viewed on the
Internet at http://www.regulations.gov by following the online
instructions for accessing the dockets. DOT's complete Privacy Act
Statement is available for review in the Federal Register published on
April 11, 2000, (65 FR 19477-78).
    The petition, supporting materials, and all comments received
before the close of business on the closing date indicated below will
be filed and will be considered. All comments and supporting materials
received after the closing date will also be filed and will be
considered to the extent possible. When the petition is granted or
denied, notice of the decision will be published in the Federal
Register pursuant to the authority indicated below.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
    I. Overview: Pursuant to 49 U.S.C. 30118(d) and 30120(h) (see
implementing rule at 49 CFR part 556), BATO submitted a petition for an
exemption from the notification and remedy requirements of 49 U.S.C.
Chapter 301 on the basis that this noncompliance is inconsequential to
motor vehicle safety.
    This notice of receipt of BATO's petition is published under 49
U.S.C. 30118 and 30120 and does not represent any agency decision or
other exercise of judgment concerning the merits of the petition.
    II. Tires Involved: Affected are approximately 328 Bridgestone
R192GZ size 12R22.5 bus tires sold in the U.S. territory of Guam and
manufactured between January 1, 2004 and April 30, 2015.
    III. Noncompliance: BATO explains that the noncompliance is that
the sidewall of the subject tires clearly states the speed restriction
in km/h, however, omits the English units in mph as required by
paragraph S6.5(e) of FMVSS No. 119.
    IV. Rule Text: Paragraph S6.5 of FMVSS No. 121 requires in
pertinent part:

    S6.5 Tire Markings. Except as specified in this paragraph, each
tire shall be marked on each sidewall with the information specified
in paragraphs (a) through (j) of this section . . .
    (e) The speed restriction of the tire, if 90 km/h (55 mph) or
less, shown as follows:
    Max speed __km/h (__mph).

    V. Summary of BATO's Petition: BATO believes that the subject
noncompliance is inconsequential to motor vehicle safety. BATO states
that Guam does not have interstate highways and that the speed limits
throughout Guam (35 mph rural, 15 mph urban and 15-25 in school zones)
are significantly lower than the speed restriction of the subject tires
(55 mph), thus, BATO, believes that there is no risk of drivers
consistently driving faster than the speed restriction on the tires,
even if a driver is unfamiliar with metric units.
    BATO also believes that most professional drivers would understand
the speed restriction as stated in metric units. Since the subject
tires cannot be used in a passenger vehicle application, and will be
serviced and driven by professionals who understand the difference
between English and metric units; it is unlikely an unqualified driver
would mistakenly drive these tires faster than the speed restriction.
    BATO notes that they have not received any complaints, claims, or
warranty adjustments related to the subject tires and that these tires,
meet all other performance requirements of FMVSS No. 119.
    BATO has additionally informed NHTSA that it has corrected the
noncompliance so that all future production of the subject tires
complies with FMVSS No. 119.
    In summation, BATO believes that the described noncompliance of the
subject tires is inconsequential to motor vehicle safety, and that its
petition, to exempt BATO from providing recall notification of
noncompliance as required by 49 U.S.C. 30118 and remedying the recall
noncompliance as required by 49 U.S.C. 30120 should be granted.
    NHTSA notes that the statutory provisions (49 U.S.C. 30118(d) and
30120(h)) that permit manufacturers to file petitions for a
determination of inconsequentiality allow NHTSA to exempt manufacturers
only from the duties found in sections 30118 and 30120, respectively,
to notify owners, purchasers, and dealers of a defect or noncompliance
and to remedy the defect or noncompliance. Therefore, any decision on
this petition only applies to the subject tires that BATO no longer
controlled at the time it determined that the noncompliance existed.
However, any decision on this petition does not relieve equipment
distributors and dealers of the prohibitions on the sale, offer for
sale, or introduction or delivery for introduction into interstate
commerce of the noncompliant tires under their control after BATO
notified them that the subject noncompliance existed.

    Authority: (49 U.S.C. 30118, 30120: delegations of authority at
49 CFR 1.95 and 501.8)

Jeffrey Giuseppe,
Director, Office of Vehicle Safety Compliance.
[FR Doc. 2015-25067 Filed 10-1-15; 8:45 am]
 BILLING CODE 4910-59-P


[Federal Register Volume 76, Number 181 (Monday, September 19, 2011)]
[Notices]
[Pages 58027-58028]
[FR Doc No: 2011-23912]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY

Federal Emergency Management Agency

[Internal Agency Docket No. FEMA-4019-DR; Docket ID FEMA-2011-0001]

North Carolina; Amendment No. 8 to Notice of a Major Disaster
Declaration

AGENCY: Federal Emergency Management Agency, DHS.

ACTION: Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: This notice amends the notice of a major disaster declaration
for the State of North Carolina (FEMA-4019-DR), dated August 31, 2011,
and related determinations.

DATES: Effective Date: September 13, 2011.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Peggy Miller, Office of Response and
Recovery, Federal Emergency Management Agency, 500 C Street, SW.,
Washington, DC 20472,<PHONE_NUMBER>.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The notice of a major disaster declaration
for the State of North Carolina is hereby amended to include the
following area among those areas determined to have been adversely
affected by the event declared a major disaster by the President in his
declaration of August 31, 2011.

    Vance County for Public Assistance, including direct federal
assistance (already designated for Individual Assistance).

    The following Catalog of Federal Domestic Assistance Numbers
(CFDA) are to be used for reporting and drawing funds: 97.030,
Community Disaster Loans; 97.031, Cora Brown Fund; 97.032, Crisis
Counseling; 97.033, Disaster Legal Services; 97.034, Disaster
Unemployment Assistance (DUA); 97.046, Fire Management Assistance
Grant; 97.048, Disaster Housing Assistance to Individuals and
Households in Presidentially Declared Disaster Areas; 97.049,
Presidentially Declared Disaster Assistance--Disaster Housing
Operations for Individuals and Households; 97.050, Presidentially

Declared Disaster Assistance to Individuals and Households--Other
Needs; 97.036, Disaster Grants--Public Assistance (Presidentially
Declared Disasters); 97.039, Hazard Mitigation Grant.

    Dated: September 12, 2011.
W. Craig Fugate,
Administrator, Federal Emergency Management Agency.
[FR Doc. 2011-23912 Filed 9-16-11; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 9111-23-P


[Federal Register Volume 77, Number 159 (Thursday, August 16, 2012)]
[Proposed Rules]
[Pages 49399-49400]
[FR Doc No: 2012-20143]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION

Federal Aviation Administration

14 CFR Part 71

[Docket No. FAA-2012-0654; Airspace Docket No. 12-ACE-3]

Proposed Amendment of Class E Airspace; Forest City, IA

AGENCY: Federal Aviation Administration (FAA), DOT.

ACTION: Notice of proposed rulemaking (NPRM).

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: This action proposes to amend Class E airspace at Forest City,
IA. Additional controlled airspace is necessary to accommodate new
Standard Instrument Approach Procedures (SIAP) at Forest City Municipal
Airport. Also, this action would update the geographic coordinates of
the Forest City nondirectional radio beacon (NDB). The FAA is taking
this action to enhance the safety and management of Instrument Flight
Rules (IFR) operations for SIAPs at the airport.

DATES: 0901 UTC. Comments must be received on or before October 1,
2012.

ADDRESSES: Send comments on this proposal to the U.S. Department of
Transportation, Docket Operations, 1200 New Jersey Avenue SE., West
Building Ground Floor, Room W12-140, Washington, DC 20590-0001. You
must identify the docket number FAA-2012-0654/Airspace Docket No. 12-
ACE-3, at the beginning of your comments. You may also submit comments
through the Internet at http://www.regulations.gov. You may review the
public docket containing the proposal, any comments received, and any
final disposition in person in the Dockets Office between 9 a.m. and 5
p.m., Monday through Friday, except Federal holidays. The Docket Office
(telephone 1-800-647-5527), is on the ground floor of the building at
the above address.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Scott Enander, Central Service Center,
Operations Support Group, Federal Aviation Administration, Southwest
Region, 2601 Meacham Blvd., Fort Worth, TX 76137; telephone: (817) 321-
7716.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

Comments Invited

    Interested parties are invited to participate in this proposed
rulemaking by submitting such written data, views, or arguments, as
they may desire. Comments that provide the factual basis supporting the
views and suggestions presented are particularly helpful in developing
reasoned regulatory decisions on the proposal. Comments are
specifically invited on the overall regulatory, aeronautical, economic,
environmental, and energy-related aspects of the proposal.
Communications should identify both docket numbers and be submitted in
triplicate to the address listed above. Commenters wishing the FAA to
acknowledge receipt of their comments on this notice must submit with
those comments a self-addressed, stamped postcard on which the
following statement is made: ``Comments to Docket No. FAA-2012-0654/
Airspace Docket No. 12-ACE-3.'' The postcard will be date/time stamped
and returned to the commenter.

Availability of NPRMs

    An electronic copy of this document may be downloaded through the
Internet at http://www.regulations.gov. Recently published rulemaking
documents can also be accessed through the FAA's Web page at http://www.faa.gov/airports_airtraffic/air_traffic/publications/airspace_amendments/.
    You may review the public docket containing the proposal, any
comments received and any final disposition in person in the Dockets
Office (see ADDRESSES section for address and phone number) between 9
a.m. and 5 p.m., Monday through Friday, except Federal holidays. An
informal docket may also be examined during normal business hours at
the office of the Central Service Center, 2601 Meacham Blvd., Fort
Worth, TX 76137.
    Persons interested in being placed on a mailing list for future
NPRMs should contact the FAA's Office of Rulemaking<PHONE_NUMBER>, to
request a copy of Advisory Circular No. 11-2A, Notice of Proposed
Rulemaking Distribution System, which describes the application
procedure.

The Proposal

    This action proposes to amend Title 14, Code of Federal Regulations
(14 CFR), Part 71 by amending Class E airspace extending upward from
700 feet above the surface to accommodate new standard instrument
approach procedures at Forest City Municipal Airport, Forest City, IA.
The geographic coordinates of the Forest City NDB would also be updated
to coincide with the FAA's aeronautical database. Controlled airspace
is needed for the safety and management of IFR operations at the
airport
    Class E airspace areas are published in Paragraph 6005 of FAA Order
7400.9V, dated August 9, 2011, and effective September 15, 2011, which
is incorporated by reference in 14 CFR 71.1. The Class E airspace
designation listed in this document would be published subsequently in
the Order.
    The FAA has determined that this proposed regulation only involves
an established body of technical regulations for which frequent and
routine amendments are necessary to keep them operationally current.
It, therefore, (1) is not a ``significant regulatory action'' under
Executive Order 12866; (2) is not a ``significant rule'' under DOT
Regulatory Policies and Procedures (44 FR 11034; February 26, 1979);
and (3) does not warrant preparation of a Regulatory Evaluation as the
anticipated impact is so minimal. Since this is a routine matter that
will only affect air traffic procedures and air navigation, it is
certified that this rule, when promulgated, will not have a significant
economic impact on a substantial number of small entities under the
criteria of the Regulatory Flexibility Act.
    The FAA's authority to issue rules regarding aviation safety is
found in Title 49 of the U.S. Code. Subtitle 1, Section 106 describes
the authority of the FAA Administrator. Subtitle VII, Aviation
Programs, describes in more detail the scope of the agency's authority.
This rulemaking is promulgated under the authority described in
Subtitle VII, Part A, Subpart I, Section 40103. Under that section, the
FAA is charged with

prescribing regulations to assign the use of airspace necessary to
ensure the safety of aircraft and the efficient use of airspace. This
regulation is within the scope of that authority as it would amend
controlled airspace at Forest City Municipal Airport, Forest City, IA.

Environmental Review

    This proposal will be subject to an environmental analysis in
accordance with FAA Order 1050.1E, ``Environmental Impacts: Policies
and Procedures'' prior to any FAA final regulatory action.

List of Subjects in 14 CFR Part 71

    Airspace, Incorporation by reference, Navigation (air).

The Proposed Amendment

    In consideration of the foregoing, the Federal Aviation
Administration proposes to amend 14 CFR Part 71 as follows:

PART 71--DESIGNATION OF CLASS A, B, C, D, AND E AIRSPACE AREAS; AIR
TRAFFIC SERVICE ROUTES; AND REPORTING POINTS

    1. The authority citation for part 71 continues to read as follows:

     Authority:  49 U.S.C. 106(g); 40103, 40113, 40120; E.O. 10854,
24 FR 9565, 3 CFR, 1959-1963 Comp., p. 389.

Sec.  71.1  [Amended]

    2. The incorporation by reference in 14 CFR 71.1 of FAA Order
7400.9V, Airspace Designations and Reporting Points, dated August 9,
2011, and effective September 15, 2011, is amended as follows:

Paragraph 6005 Class E airspace areas extending upward from 700
feet or more above the surface of the earth.

* * * * *

ACE IA E5 Forest City, IA [Amended]

Forest City Municipal Airport, IA
    (Lat. 43[deg]14'05'' N., long. 93[deg]37'27'' W.)
Forest City NDB
    (Lat. 43[deg]14'09'' N., long. 93[deg]37'15'' W.)

    That airspace extending upward from 700 feet above the surface
within a 6.9-mile radius of Forest City Municipal Airport, and
within 4 miles each side of the 347[deg] bearing from the airport
extending from the 6.9-mile radius to 10.6 miles north of the
airport, and within 2.6 miles each side of the 162[deg] bearing from
the Forest City NDB extending from the 6.9-mile radius to 7.4 miles
southeast of the airport.

    Issued in Fort Worth, TX, on July 27, 2012.
David P. Medina,
Manager, Operations Support Group, ATO Central Service Center.
[FR Doc. 2012-20143 Filed 8-15-12; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910-13-P


[Federal Register Volume 79, Number 139 (Monday, July 21, 2014)]
[Notices]
[Page 42312]
[FR Doc No: 2014-17064]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission

[Moon Lake Electric Association, Inc.; Project No. 190-104]

Notice of Intent To File License Application, Filing of Pre-
Application Document, and Approving Use of the Traditional Licensing
Process

    a. Type of Filing: Notice of Intent to File License Application and
Request to Use the Traditional Licensing Process.
    b. Project No.: 190-104.
    c. Date Filed: May 30, 2014.
    d. Submitted By: Moon Lake Electric Association, Inc.
    e. Name of Project: Uintah Hydroelectric Project.
    f. Location: On Uinta River in Duchesne County, Utah. The project
is located on federal lands of Ashley National Forest and tribal lands
of the Uintah and Ouray Native American Reservation.
    g. Filed Pursuant to: 18 CFR 5.3 of the Commission's regulations.
    h. Potential Applicant Contact: M. Jared Griffiths, Engineering
Manager, Moon Lake Electric Association, Inc., P.O. Box 278, 800 West
U.S. Highway 40, Roosevelt, Utah 84066-0278;<PHONE_NUMBER>;
<EMAIL_ADDRESS>    i. FERC Contact: Jennifer Adams at<PHONE_NUMBER>; or email at
<EMAIL_ADDRESS>    j. Moon Lake Electric Association, Inc. (Moon Lake Electric) filed
its request to use the Traditional Licensing Process on May 30, 2014.
Moon Lake Electric provided public notice of its request on June 5,
2013. In a letter dated July 15, 2014, the Director of the Division of
Hydropower Licensing approved Moon Lake Electric's request to use the
Traditional Licensing Process.
    k. With this notice, we are initiating informal consultation with:
(a) The U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service and/or NOAA Fisheries under
section 7 of the Endangered Species Act and the joint agency
regulations thereunder at 50 CFR, Part 402; (b) NOAA Fisheries under
section 305(b) of the Magnuson-Stevens Fishery Conservation and
Management Act and implementing regulations at 50 CFR 600.920; and (c)
the California State Historic Preservation Officer, as required by
section 106, National Historical Preservation Act, and the implementing
regulations of the Advisory Council on Historic Preservation at 36 CFR
800.2.
    l. With this notice, we are designating Moon Lake Electric as the
Commission's non-federal representative for carrying out informal
consultation, pursuant to section 7 of the Endangered Species Act,
section 305 of the Magnuson-Stevens Fishery Conservation and Management
Act, and section 106 of the National Historic Preservation Act.
    m. Moon Lake Electric filed a Pre-Application Document (PAD;
including a proposed process plan and schedule) with the Commission,
pursuant to 18 CFR 5.6 of the Commission's regulations.
    n. A copy of the PAD is available for review at the Commission in
the Public Reference Room or may be viewed on the Commission's Web site
(http://www.ferc.gov), using the ``eLibrary'' link. Enter the docket
number, excluding the last three digits in the docket number field to
access the document. For assistance, contact FERC Online Support at
<EMAIL_ADDRESS>(866) 208-3676 (toll free), or (202) 502-
8659 (TTY). A copy is also available for inspection and reproduction at
the address in paragraph h.
    o. Register online at http://www.ferc.gov/docs-filing/esubscription.asp to be notified via email of new filing and issuances
related to this or other pending projects. For assistance, contact FERC
Online Support.

    Dated: July 15, 2014.
Kimberly D. Bose,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2014-17064 Filed 7-18-14; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6717-01-P


region facility species. orig stage year impinged. est entrained. est notes dummy dummy dummy dummy  999  999  999 dummy river elrama gizzard. shad age01 1978 422,163 . RM # 35665; Table D 2 river elrama tiger. muskellunge age01 1978 517 . RM # 35665; Table D 2 river elrama white. sucker age01 1978 517 . RM # 35665; Table D 2 river elrama carp age01 1978 3,617 . RM # 35665; Table D 2 river elrama goldfish age01 1978 2,067 . RM # 35665; Table D 2 river elrama carp. goldfish age01 1978 517 . RM # 35665; Table D 2 river elrama golden. shiner age01 1978 3,100 . RM # 35665; Table D 2 river elrama emerald. shiner age01 1978 143,649 . RM # 35665; Table D 2 river elrama spotfin. shiner age01 1978 2,067 . RM # 35665; Table D 2 river elrama sand. shiner age01 1978 2,584 . RM # 35665; Table D 2 river elrama mimic. shiner age01 1978 1,033 . RM # 35665; Table D 2 river elrama shiner. spp age01 1978 517 . RM # 35665; Table D 2 river elrama bluntnose. minnow age01 1978 3,100 . RM # 35665; Table D 2 river elrama channel. catfish age01 1978 98,694 . RM # 35665; Table D 2 river elrama yellow. bullhead age01 1978 517 . RM # 35665; Table D 2 river elrama brown. bullhead age01 1978 3,100 . RM # 35665; Table D 2 river elrama catfish. spp age01 1978 1,033 . RM # 35665; Table D 2 river elrama rock. bass age01 1978 8,784 . RM # 35665; Table D 2 river elrama white. crappie age01 1978 15,502 . RM # 35665; Table D 2 river elrama black. crappie age01 1978 2,067 . RM # 35665; Table D 2 river elrama largemouth. bass age01 1978 6,717 . RM # 35665; Table D 2 river elrama smallmouth. bass age01 1978 517 . RM # 35665; Table D 2 river elrama green. sunfish age01 1978 4,134 . RM # 35665; Table D 2 river elrama pumpkinseed age01 1978 534,808 . RM # 35665; Table D 2 river elrama bluegill age01 1978 2,962,890 . RM # 35665; Table D 2 river elrama warmouth age01 1978 517 . RM # 35665; Table D 2 river elrama sunfish. spp age01 1978 9,818 . RM # 35665; Table D 2 river elrama logperch age01 1978 2,067 . RM # 35665; Table D 2 river elrama bluntnose. shiner egg 1978 . 366 RM# 35665; Table D 3 river elrama bluntnose. shiner larvae 1978 . 854 RM# 35665; Table D 3 river elrama carp egg 1978 . 7686 RM# 35665; Table D 3 river elrama carp larvae 1978 . 8540 RM# 35665; Table D 3 river elrama catfish. spp larvae 1978 . 610 RM# 35665; Table D 3 river elrama channel. catfish larvae 1978 . 122 RM# 35665; Table D 3 river elrama emerald. shiner egg 1978 . 14030 RM# 35665; Table D 3 river elrama emerald. shiner larvae 1978 . 16714 RM# 35665; Table D 3 river elrama fathead. minnow larvae 1978 . 244 RM# 35665; Table D 3 river elrama gizzard. shad egg 1978 . 244 RM# 35665; Table D 3 river elrama gizzard. shad larvae 1978 . 29280 RM# 35665; Table D 3 river elrama johnny. darter larvae 1978 . 1830 RM# 35665; Table D 3 river elrama logperch larvae 1978 . 122 RM# 35665; Table D 3 river elrama minnow. spp egg 1978 . 2318 RM# 35665; Table D 3 river elrama minnow. spp larvae 1978 . 114314 RM# 35665; Table D 3 river elrama perch. spp larvae 1978 . 854 RM# 35665; Table D 3 river elrama pumpkinseed larvae 1978 . 122 RM# 35665; Table D 3 river elrama shiner. spp larvae 1978 . 3538 RM# 35665; Table D 3 river elrama spotfin. shiner larvae 1978 . 4148 RM# 35665; Table D 3 river elrama stoneroller larvae 1978 . 122 RM# 35665; Table D 3 river elrama sunfish. spp larvae 1978 . 1342 RM# 35665; Table D 3 river elrama unknown egg 1978 . 14274 RM# 35665; Table D 3 river elrama unknown larvae 1978 . 62464 RM# 35665; Table D 3 river elrama walleye larvae 1978 . 732 RM# 35665; Table D 3 river elrama white. sucker larvae 1978 . 122 RM# 35665; Table D 3 river elrama yellow. bullhead larvae 1978 . 366 RM# 35665; Table D 3 river elrama bluntnose. minnow larvae 1978 . 610 RM# 35665; Table D 3 river elrama yellow. perch larvae 1978 . 122 RM# 35665; Table D 3 qc dummy lefer lefer lefer lefer lefer lefer lefer lefer lefer lefer lefer lefer lefer lefer lefer lefer lefer lefer lefer lefer lefer lefer lefer lefer lefer lefer lefer lefer lefer lefer lefer lefer lefer lefer lefer lefer lefer lefer lefer lefer lefer lefer lefer lefer lefer lefer lefer lefer lefer lefer lefer lefer lefer lefer lefer lefer species stage ent daily. ent ent. extrap source qc walleye larvae 1 8 122 RM# 35665, Table D 3 lefer walleye larvae 1 8 122 RM# 35665, Table D 3 lefer walleye larvae 1 8 122 RM# 35665, Table D 3 lefer Sum of ent. extrap walleye larvae 1 8 122 RM# 35665, Table D 3 lefer species stage walleye larvae 1 8 122 RM# 35665, Table D 3 lefer bluntnose. shiner eggs walleye larvae 1 8 122 RM# 35665, Table D 3 lefer larvae unknown eggs 1 8 122 RM# 35665, Table D 3 lefer carp eggs minnow. spp eggs 1 8 122 RM# 35665, Table D 3 lefer larvae white. sucker larvae 1 8 122 RM# 35665, Table D 3 lefer catfish. spp larvae johnny. darter larvae 1 8 122 RM# 35665, Table D 3 lefer channel. catfish larvae johnny. darter larvae 1 8 122 RM# 35665, Table D 3 lefer emerald. shiner eggs yellow. perch larvae 1 8 122 RM# 35665, Table D 3 lefer larvae logperch larvae 1 8 122 RM# 35665, Table D 3 lefer fathead. minnow larvae johnny. darter larvae 1 8 122 RM# 35665, Table D 3 lefer gizzard. shad eggs carp eggs 18 144 2196 RM# 35665, Table D 3 lefer larvae minnow. spp eggs 3 24 366 RM# 35665, Table D 3 lefer johnny. darter larvae unknown eggs 1 8 122 RM# 35665, Table D 3 lefer logperch larvae emerald. shiner larvae 2 16 244 RM# 35665, Table D 3 lefer minnow. spp eggs minnow. spp larvae 11 88 1342 RM# 35665, Table D 3 lefer larvae minnow. spp larvae 1 8 122 RM# 35665, Table D 3 lefer perch. spp larvae gizzard. shad larvae 1 8 122 RM# 35665, Table D 3 lefer pumpkinseed larvae emerald. shiner larvae 2 16 244 RM# 35665, Table D 3 lefer shiner. spp larvae minnow. spp larvae 5 40 610 RM# 35665, Table D 3 lefer spotfin. shiner larvae johnny. darter larvae 1 8 122 RM# 35665, Table D 3 lefer stoneroller larvae minnow. spp larvae 5 40 610 RM# 35665, Table D 3 lefer sunfish. spp larvae carp larvae 3 24 366 RM# 35665, Table D 3 lefer unknown eggs carp eggs 1 8 122 RM# 35665, Table D 3 lefer larvae minnow. spp larvae 4 32 488 RM# 35665, Table D 3 lefer walleye larvae unknown eggs 2 16 244 RM# 35665, Table D 3 lefer white. sucker larvae gizzard. shad larvae 2 16 244 RM# 35665, Table D 3 lefer yellow. bullhead larvae emerald. shiner larvae 1 8 122 RM# 35665, Table D 3 lefer ( blank) ( blank) minnow. spp larvae 9 72 1098 RM# 35665, Table D 3 lefer bluntnose. minnow larvae carp larvae 1 8 122 RM# 35665, Table D 3 lefer yellow. perch larvae carp eggs 3 24 366 RM# 35665, Table D 3 lefer Grand Total minnow. spp larvae 1 8 122 RM# 35665, Table D 3 lefer sunfish. spp larvae 1 8 122 RM# 35665, Table D 3 lefer gizzard. shad larvae 1 8 122 RM# 35665, Table D 3 lefer emerald. shiner larvae 1 8 122 RM# 35665, Table D 3 lefer minnow. spp larvae 2 16 244 RM# 35665, Table D 3 lefer carp eggs 37 296 4514 RM# 35665, Table D 3 lefer minnow. spp eggs 1 8 122 RM# 35665, Table D 3 lefer unknown eggs 1 8 122 RM# 35665, Table D 3 lefer gizzard. shad larvae 5 40 610 RM# 35665, Table D 3 lefer carp larvae 1 8 122 RM# 35665, Table D 3 lefer emerald. shiner larvae 3 24 366 RM# 35665, Table D 3 lefer minnow. spp larvae 16 128 1952 RM# 35665, Table D 3 lefer gizzard. shad larvae 67 536 8174 RM# 35665, Table D 3 lefer carp larvae 1 8 122 RM# 35665, Table D 3 lefer emerald. shiner larvae 7 56 854 RM# 35665, Table D 3 lefer emerald. shiner eggs 11 88 1342 RM# 35665, Table D 3 lefer spotfin. shiner larvae 1 8 122 RM# 35665, Table D 3 lefer minnow. spp larvae 41 328 5002 RM# 35665, Table D 3 lefer sunfish. spp larvae 1 8 122 RM# 35665, Table D 3 lefer gizzard. shad larvae 24 192 2928 RM# 35665, Table D 3 lefer carp larvae 13 104 1586 RM# 35665, Table D 3 lefer emerald. shiner larvae 26 208 3172 RM# 35665, Table D 3 lefer emerald. shiner eggs 30 240 3660 RM# 35665, Table D 3 lefer spotfin. shiner larvae 17 136 2074 RM# 35665, Table D 3 lefer bluntnose. shiner larvae 6 48 732 RM# 35665, Table D 3 lefer minnow. spp larvae 48 384 5856 RM# 35665, Table D 3 lefer catfish. spp larvae 1 8 122 RM# 35665, Table D 3 lefer johnny. darter larvae 3 24 366 RM# 35665, Table D 3 lefer gizzard. shad larvae 3 24 366 RM# 35665, Table D 3 lefer carp larvae 1 8 122 RM# 35665, Table D 3 lefer emerald. shiner larvae 18 144 2196 RM# 35665, Table D 3 lefer emerald. shiner eggs 22 176 2684 RM# 35665, Table D 3 lefer spotfin. shiner larvae 2 16 244 RM# 35665, Table D 3 lefer minnow. spp larvae 27 216 3294 RM# 35665, Table D 3 lefer catfish. spp larvae 3 24 366 RM# 35665, Table D 3 lefer johnny. darter larvae 1 8 122 RM# 35665, Table D 3 lefer carp eggs 1 8 122 RM# 35665, Table D 3 lefer minnow. spp larvae 3 24 366 RM# 35665, Table D 3 lefer catfish. spp larvae 1 8 122 RM# 35665, Table D 3 lefer johnny. darter larvae 2 16 244 RM# 35665, Table D 3 lefer perch. spp larvae 1 8 122 RM# 35665, Table D 3 lefer unknown larvae 75 600 9150 RM# 35665, Table D 3 lefer unknown eggs 4 32 488 RM# 35665, Table D 3 lefer gizzard. shad larvae 17 136 2074 RM# 35665, Table D 3 lefer carp larvae 5 40 610 RM# 35665, Table D 3 lefer emerald. shiner larvae 13 104 1586 RM# 35665, Table D 3 lefer emerald. shiner eggs 2 16 244 RM# 35665, Table D 3 lefer spotfin. shiner larvae 4 32 488 RM# 35665, Table D 3 lefer bluntnose. minnowlarvae 5 40 610 RM# 35665, Table D 3 lefer minnow. spp larvae 23 184 2806 RM# 35665, Table D 3 lefer minnow. spp eggs 1 8 122 RM# 35665, Table D 3 lefer sunfish. spp larvae 1 8 122 RM# 35665, Table D 3 lefer johnny. darter larvae 2 16 244 RM# 35665, Table D 3 lefer gizzard. shad larvae 2 16 244 RM# 35665, Table D 3 lefer carp larvae 2 16 244 RM# 35665, Table D 3 lefer carp eggs 2 16 244 RM# 35665, Table D 3 lefer stoneroller larvae 1 8 122 RM# 35665, Table D 3 lefer emerald. shiner larvae 1 8 122 RM# 35665, Table D 3 lefer minnow. spp larvae 238 1904 29036 RM# 35665, Table D 3 lefer yellow. bullhead larvae 3 24 366 RM# 35665, Table D 3 lefer perch. spp larvae 2 16 244 RM# 35665, Table D 3 lefer unknown larvae 2 16 244 RM# 35665, Table D 3 lefer gizzard. shad larvae 2 16 244 RM# 35665, Table D 3 lefer carp larvae 2 16 244 RM# 35665, Table D 3 lefer carp eggs 1 8 122 RM# 35665, Table D 3 lefer minnow. spp larvae 1 8 122 RM# 35665, Table D 3 lefer perch. spp larvae 2 16 244 RM# 35665, Table D 3 lefer unknown larvae 24 192 2928 RM# 35665, Table D 3 lefer carp larvae 3 24 366 RM# 35665, Table D 3 lefer shiner. spp larvae 5 40 610 RM# 35665, Table D 3 lefer minnow. spp larvae 51 408 6222 RM# 35665, Table D 3 lefer minnow. spp eggs 3 24 366 RM# 35665, Table D 3 lefer pumpkinseed larvae 1 8 122 RM# 35665, Table D 3 lefer unknown eggs 2 16 244 RM# 35665, Table D 3 lefer gizzard. shad larvae 4 32 488 RM# 35665, Table D 3 lefer minnow. spp larvae 14 112 1708 RM# 35665, Table D 3 lefer gizzard. shad larvae 6 48 732 RM# 35665, Table D 3 lefer carp larvae 18 144 2196 RM# 35665, Table D 3 lefer emerald. shiner larvae 10 80 1220 RM# 35665, Table D 3 lefer emerald. shiner eggs 4 32 488 RM# 35665, Table D 3 lefer spotfin. shiner larvae 1 8 122 RM# 35665, Table D 3 lefer minnow. spp larvae 36 288 4392 RM# 35665, Table D 3 lefer minnow. spp eggs 5 40 610 RM# 35665, Table D 3 lefer sunfish. spp larvae 3 24 366 RM# 35665, Table D 3 lefer gizzard. shad larvae 6 48 732 RM# 35665, Table D 3 lefer carp larvae 5 40 610 RM# 35665, Table D 3 lefer emerald. shiner larvae 28 224 3416 RM# 35665, Table D 3 lefer emerald. shiner eggs 1 8 122 RM# 35665, Table D 3 lefer spotfin. shiner larvae 1 8 122 RM# 35665, Table D 3 lefer minnow. spp larvae 65 520 7930 RM# 35665, Table D 3 lefer sunfish. spp larvae 1 8 122 RM# 35665, Table D 3 lefer gizzard. shad larvae 10 80 1220 RM# 35665, Table D 3 lefer carp larvae 3 24 366 RM# 35665, Table D 3 lefer emerald. shiner larvae 3 24 366 RM# 35665, Table D 3 lefer emerald. shiner eggs 4 32 488 RM# 35665, Table D 3 lefer spotfin. shiner larvae 1 8 122 RM# 35665, Table D 3 lefer bluntnose. shiner larvae 1 8 122 RM# 35665, Table D 3 lefer bluntnose. shiner eggs 3 24 366 RM# 35665, Table D 3 lefer minnow. spp larvae 74 592 9028 RM# 35665, Table D 3 lefer sunfish. spp larvae 2 16 244 RM# 35665, Table D 3 lefer johnny. darter larvae 3 24 366 RM# 35665, Table D 3 lefer gizzard. shad larvae 6 48 732 RM# 35665, Table D 3 lefer carp larvae 2 16 244 RM# 35665, Table D 3 lefer emerald. shiner larvae 19 152 2318 RM# 35665, Table D 3 lefer emerald. shiner eggs 41 328 5002 RM# 35665, Table D 3 lefer spotfin. shiner larvae 7 56 854 RM# 35665, Table D 3 lefer minnow. spp larvae 19 152 2318 RM# 35665, Table D 3 lefer minnow. spp eggs 4 32 488 RM# 35665, Table D 3 lefer sunfish. spp larvae 1 8 122 RM# 35665, Table D 3 lefer minnow. spp larvae 5 40 610 RM# 35665, Table D 3 lefer minnow. spp larvae 13 104 1586 RM# 35665, Table D 3 lefer gizzard. shad larvae 3 24 366 RM# 35665, Table D 3 lefer minnow. spp larvae 9 72 1098 RM# 35665, Table D 3 lefer unknown larvae 20 160 2440 RM# 35665, Table D 3 lefer unknown eggs 3 24 366 RM# 35665, Table D 3 lefer gizzard. shad larvae 7 56 854 RM# 35665, Table D 3 lefer minnow. spp larvae 16 128 1952 RM# 35665, Table D 3 lefer unknown larvae 40 320 4880 RM# 35665, Table D 3 lefer unknown eggs 1 8 122 RM# 35665, Table D 3 lefer gizzard. shad larvae 7 56 854 RM# 35665, Table D 3 lefer minnow. spp larvae 40 320 4880 RM# 35665, Table D 3 lefer unknown larvae 69 552 8418 RM# 35665, Table D 3 lefer gizzard. shad larvae 3 24 366 RM# 35665, Table D 3 lefer carp larvae 1 8 122 RM# 35665, Table D 3 lefer minnow. spp larvae 12 96 1464 RM# 35665, Table D 3 lefer unknown larvae 26 208 3172 RM# 35665, Table D 3 lefer unknown eggs 1 8 122 RM# 35665, Table D 3 lefer gizzard. shad larvae 13 104 1586 RM# 35665, Table D 3 lefer emerald. shiner larvae 1 8 122 RM# 35665, Table D 3 lefer minnow. spp larvae 8 64 976 RM# 35665, Table D 3 lefer unknown larvae 24 192 2928 RM# 35665, Table D 3 lefer gizzard. shad larvae 7 56 854 RM# 35665, Table D 3 lefer carp larvae 1 8 122 RM# 35665, Table D 3 lefer emerald. shiner larvae 1 8 122 RM# 35665, Table D 3 lefer minnow. spp larvae 11 88 1342 RM# 35665, Table D 3 lefer unknown larvae 38 304 4636 RM# 35665, Table D 3 lefer gizzard. shad larvae 2 16 244 RM# 35665, Table D 3 lefer minnow. spp larvae 10 80 1220 RM# 35665, Table D 3 lefer gizzard. shad larvae 5 40 610 RM# 35665, Table D 3 lefer minnow. spp larvae 3 24 366 RM# 35665, Table D 3 lefer unknown larvae 6 48 732 RM# 35665, Table D 3 lefer gizzard. shad larvae 4 32 488 RM# 35665, Table D 3 lefer minnow. spp larvae 14 112 1708 RM# 35665, Table D 3 lefer unknown larvae 44 352 5368 RM# 35665, Table D 3 lefer gizzard. shad larvae 2 16 244 RM# 35665, Table D 3 lefer gizzard. shad eggs 1 8 122 RM# 35665, Table D 3 lefer minnow. spp larvae 1 8 122 RM# 35665, Table D 3 lefer unknown larvae 3 24 366 RM# 35665, Table D 3 lefer gizzard. shad larvae 2 16 244 RM# 35665, Table D 3 lefer minnow. spp larvae 5 40 610 RM# 35665, Table D 3 lefer gizzard. shad larvae 3 24 366 RM# 35665, Table D 3 lefer minnow. spp larvae 7 56 854 RM# 35665, Table D 3 lefer perch. spp larvae 2 16 244 RM# 35665, Table D 3 lefer unknown eggs 1 8 122 RM# 35665, Table D 3 lefer gizzard. shad larvae 1 8 122 RM# 35665, Table D 3 lefer minnow. spp larvae 3 24 366 RM# 35665, Table D 3 lefer unknown larvae 3 24 366 RM# 35665, Table D 3 lefer unknown eggs 35 280 4270 RM# 35665, Table D 3 lefer shiner. spp larvae 2 16 244 RM# 35665, Table D 3 lefer minnow. spp larvae 12 96 1464 RM# 35665, Table D 3 lefer unknown eggs 3 24 366 RM# 35665, Table D 3 lefer gizzard. shad larvae 7 56 854 RM# 35665, Table D 3 lefer minnow. spp larvae 9 72 1098 RM# 35665, Table D 3 lefer unknown larvae 5 40 610 RM# 35665, Table D 3 lefer gizzard. shad larvae 4 32 488 RM# 35665, Table D 3 lefer carp larvae 3 24 366 RM# 35665, Table D 3 lefer minnow. spp larvae 38 304 4636 RM# 35665, Table D 3 lefer gizzard. shad larvae 8 64 976 RM# 35665, Table D 3 lefer carp larvae 1 8 122 RM# 35665, Table D 3 lefer minnow. spp larvae 10 80 1220 RM# 35665, Table D 3 lefer unknown larvae 7 56 854 RM# 35665, Table D 3 lefer gizzard. shad larvae 1 8 122 RM# 35665, Table D 3 lefer gizzard. shad eggs 1 8 122 RM# 35665, Table D 3 lefer carp larvae 1 8 122 RM# 35665, Table D 3 lefer minnow. spp larvae 1 8 122 RM# 35665, Table D 3 lefer unknown larvae 5 40 610 RM# 35665, Table D 3 lefer unknown eggs 2 16 244 RM# 35665, Table D 3 lefer gizzard. shad larvae 2 16 244 RM# 35665, Table D 3 lefer carp larvae 1 8 122 RM# 35665, Table D 3 lefer fathead. minnow larvae 1 8 122 RM# 35665, Table D 3 lefer minnow. spp larvae 1 8 122 RM# 35665, Table D 3 lefer carp larvae 2 16 244 RM# 35665, Table D 3 lefer shiner. spp larvae 5 40 610 RM# 35665, Table D 3 lefer gizzard. shad larvae 2 16 244 RM# 35665, Table D 3 lefer shiner. spp larvae 5 40 610 RM# 35665, Table D 3 lefer sunfish. spp larvae 1 8 122 RM# 35665, Table D 3 lefer unknown larvae 7 56 854 RM# 35665, Table D 3 lefer unknown eggs 6 48 732 RM# 35665, Table D 3 lefer gizzard. shad larvae 1 8 122 RM# 35665, Table D 3 lefer unknown larvae 1 8 122 RM# 35665, Table D 3 lefer unknown eggs 47 376 5734 RM# 35665, Table D 3 lefer fathead. minnow larvae 1 8 122 RM# 35665, Table D 3 lefer unknown larvae 9 72 1098 RM# 35665, Table D 3 lefer minnow. spp larvae 2 16 244 RM# 35665, Table D 3 lefer unknown larvae 5 40 610 RM# 35665, Table D 3 lefer unknown eggs 1 8 122 RM# 35665, Table D 3 lefer unknown larvae 1 8 122 RM# 35665, Table D 3 lefer unknown eggs 2 16 244 RM# 35665, Table D 3 lefer minnow. spp larvae 12 96 1464 RM# 35665, Table D 3 lefer unknown larvae 26 208 3172 RM# 35665, Table D 3 lefer minnow. spp larvae 1 8 122 RM# 35665, Table D 3 lefer unknown larvae 6 48 732 RM# 35665, Table D 3 lefer shiner. spp larvae 1 8 122 RM# 35665, Table D 3 lefer channel. catfish larvae 1 8 122 RM# 35665, Table D 3 lefer unknown larvae 18 144 2196 RM# 35665, Table D 3 lefer unknown eggs 1 8 122 RM# 35665, Table D 3 lefer shiner. spp larvae 6 48 732 RM# 35665, Table D 3 lefer unknown larvae 17 136 2074 RM# 35665, Table D 3 lefer unknown eggs 1 8 122 RM# 35665, Table D 3 lefer unknown larvae 13 104 1586 RM# 35665, Table D 3 lefer unknown eggs 2 16 244 RM# 35665, Table D 3 lefer minnow. spp eggs 1 8 122 RM# 35665, Table D 3 lefer unknown larvae 18 144 2196 RM# 35665, Table D 3 lefer shiner. spp larvae 1 8 122 RM# 35665, Table D 3 lefer shiner. spp larvae 1 8 122 RM# 35665, Table D 3 lefer emerald. shiner larvae 1 8 122 RM# 35665, Table D 3 lefer shiner. spp larvae 1 8 122 RM# 35665, Table D 3 lefer shiner. spp larvae 1 8 122 RM# 35665, Table D 3 lefer shiner. spp larvae 1 8 122 RM# 35665, Table D 3 lefer Total 366 854 7686 8540 610 122 14030 16714 244 244 29280 1830 122 2318 114314 854 122 3538 4148 122 1342 14274 62464 732 122 366 610 122 286090 species stage imp imp. adjust extrap. imp source qc gizzard. shad age01 817 916 422,163 RM # 35665; Table 3 1 a. gage tiger. muskellunge age01 1 1 517 RM # 35665; Table 3 1 a. gage white. sucker age01 1 1 517 RM # 35665; Table 3 1 a. gage carp age01 7 8 3,617 RM # 35665; Table 3 1 a. gage goldfish age01 4 4 2,067 RM # 35665; Table 3 1 a. gage carp. goldfish age01 1 1 517 RM # 35665; Table 3 1 a. gage golden. shiner age01 6 7 3,100 RM # 35665; Table 3 1 a. gage emerald. shiner age01 278 312 143,649 RM # 35665; Table 3 1 a. gage spotfin. shiner age01 4 4 2,067 RM # 35665; Table 3 1 a. gage sand. shiner age01 5 6 2,584 RM # 35665; Table 3 1 a. gage mimic. shiner age01 2 2 1,033 RM # 35665; Table 3 1 a. gage shiner. spp age01 1 1 517 RM # 35665; Table 3 1 a. gage bluntnose. minnow age01 6 7 3,100 RM # 35665; Table 3 1 a. gage channel. catfish age01 191 214 98,694 RM # 35665; Table 3 1 a. gage yellow. bullhead age01 1 1 517 RM # 35665; Table 3 1 a. gage brown. bullhead age01 6 7 3,100 RM # 35665; Table 3 1 a. gage catfish. spp age01 2 2 1,033 RM # 35665; Table 3 1 a. gage rock. bass age01 17 19 8,784 RM # 35665; Table 3 1 a. gage white. crappie age01 30 34 15,502 RM # 35665; Table 3 1 a. gage black. crappie age01 4 4 2,067 RM # 35665; Table 3 1 a. gage largemouth. bass age01 13 15 6,717 RM # 35665; Table 3 1 a. gage smallmouth. bass age01 1 1 517 RM # 35665; Table 3 1 a. gage green. sunfish age01 8 9 4,134 RM # 35665; Table 3 1 a. gage pumpkinseed age01 1,035 1,160 534,808 RM # 35665; Table 3 1 a. gage bluegill age01 5,734 6,426 2,962,890 RM # 35665; Table 3 1 a. gage warmouth age01 1 1 517 RM # 35665; Table 3 1 a. gage sunfish. spp age01 19 21 9,818 RM # 35665; Table 3 1 a. gage logperch age01 4 4 2,067 RM # 35665; Table 3 1 a. gage total 8,199 9,189 4,236,613 Losses data for the Elrama Power Station ( Pennsylvania). Cooling water source: Monongahela River Intake 316( b) Phase III A. Gage, 12/ 8/ 2003 Notes: Impingement sampling was conducted over 19 24 hour periods from Oct 1977 Sept 1978. Impinged fish were collected from the trave Entrainment sampling was conducted over 16 sampling dates from Sept 1977 Sept 1978, 2x per month, not including the months of D Extrapolation: Data presented contained all raw numbers by sample date. For impingement, extrapolated by first adjusting the numbers to the estimated raw impingement number of 9189, then extrapolated bas Extrapolated entrainment = daily ent. X no. days in 6 month period ( 244) / number of sampling days ( 16)

QC Checked ent data entry against document. Verified the " totals" on the losses page agree with " entry" worksheets. M. Lefer 12/ 8/ 03.

Checked imp data entry against document. A. Gage 12/ 10/ 03 avelling screens and tallied. of Dec March. Each sampling period consisted of 3 1 hr samples for which water was pumped from the intake bay through a plankton ne based on 19 sampling hours out of 8760 ( 24 x 365). net.


[Federal Register Volume 87, Number 236 (Friday, December 9, 2022)]
[Notices]
[Pages 75634-75635]
[FR Doc No: 2022-26729]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES

Food and Drug Administration

[Docket No. FDA-2022-D-2873]

Voluntary Malfunction Summary Reporting Program for
Manufacturers; Draft Guidance for Industry and Food and Drug
Administration Staff; Availability

AGENCY: Food and Drug Administration, HHS.

ACTION: Notice of availability.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Food and Drug Administration (FDA or Agency) is announcing
the availability of the draft guidance entitled ``Voluntary Malfunction
Summary Reporting (VMSR) Program for Manufacturers.'' We are publishing
this notice of availability for this draft guidance document to help
manufacturers better understand and use the VMSR Program. It is
intended to further explain, but not change, the conditions of the VMSR
Program. This draft guidance is not final nor is it for implementation
at this time.

DATES: Submit either electronic or written comments on the draft
guidance by February 7, 2023 to ensure that the Agency considers your
comment on this draft guidance before it begins work on the final
version of the guidance.

ADDRESSES: You may submit comments on any guidance at any time as
follows:

Electronic Submissions

    Submit electronic comments in the following way:
     Federal eRulemaking Portal: https://www.regulations.gov.
Follow the instructions for submitting comments. Comments submitted
electronically, including attachments, to https://www.regulations.gov
will be posted to the docket unchanged. Because your comment will be
made public, you are solely responsible for ensuring that your comment
does not include any confidential information that you or a third party
may not wish to be posted, such as medical information, your or anyone
else's Social Security number, or confidential business information,
such as a manufacturing process. Please note that if you include your
name, contact information, or other information that identifies you in
the body of your comments, that information will be posted on https://www.regulations.gov.
     If you want to submit a comment with confidential
information that you do not wish to be made available to the public,
submit the comment as a written/paper submission and in the manner
detailed (see ``Written/Paper Submissions'' and ``Instructions'').

Written/Paper Submissions

    Submit written/paper submissions as follows:
     Mail/Hand Delivery/Courier (for written/paper
submissions): Dockets Management Staff (HFA-305), Food and Drug
Administration, 5630 Fishers Lane, Rm. 1061, Rockville, MD 20852.
     For written/paper comments submitted to the Dockets
Management Staff, FDA will post your comment, as well as any
attachments, except for information submitted, marked and identified,
as confidential, if submitted as detailed in ``Instructions.''
    Instructions: All submissions received must include the Docket No.
FDA-2022-D-2873 for ``Voluntary Malfunction Summary Reporting (VMSR)
Program for Manufacturers.'' Received comments will be placed in the
docket and, except for those submitted as ``Confidential Submissions,''
publicly viewable at https://www.regulations.gov or at the Dockets
Management Staff between 9 a.m. and 4 p.m., Monday through Friday, 240-
402-7500.
     Confidential Submissions--To submit a comment with
confidential information that you do not wish to be made publicly
available, submit your comments only as a written/paper submission. You
should submit two copies total. One copy will include the information
you claim to be confidential with a heading or cover note that states
``THIS DOCUMENT CONTAINS CONFIDENTIAL INFORMATION.'' The Agency will
review this copy, including the claimed confidential information, in
its consideration of comments. The second copy, which will have the
claimed confidential information redacted/blacked out, will be
available for public viewing and posted on https://www.regulations.gov.
Submit both copies to the Dockets Management Staff. If you do not wish
your name and contact information to be made publicly available, you
can provide this information on the cover sheet and not in the body of
your comments and you must identify this information as
``confidential.'' Any information marked as ``confidential'' will not
be disclosed except in accordance with 21 CFR 10.20 and other
applicable disclosure law. For more information about FDA's posting of
comments to public dockets, see 80 FR 56469, September 18, 2015, or
access the information at: https://www.govinfo.gov/content/pkg/FR-2015-09-18/pdf/2015-23389.pdf.
    Docket: For access to the docket to read background documents or
the electronic and written/paper comments received, go to https://www.regulations.gov and insert the docket number, found in brackets in
the heading of this document, into the ``Search'' box and follow the
prompts and/or go to the Dockets Management Staff, 5630 Fishers Lane,
Rm. 1061, Rockville, MD 20852,<PHONE_NUMBER>.
    You may submit comments on any guidance at any time (see 21 CFR
10.115(g)(5)).
    An electronic copy of the guidance document is available for
download from the internet. See the SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION section
for information on electronic access to the guidance. Submit written
requests for a single hard copy of the draft guidance document entitled
``Voluntary Malfunction Summary Reporting (VMSR) Program for
Manufacturers'' to the Office of Policy, Center for Devices and
Radiological Health, Food and Drug Administration, 10903 New Hampshire
Ave., Bldg. 66, Rm. 5431, Silver Spring, MD 20993-0002. Send one self-
addressed adhesive label to assist that office in processing your
request.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Michelle Rios, Center for Devices and
Radiological Health, Food and Drug Administration, 10903 New Hampshire
Ave., Bldg. 66, Rm. 1116, Silver Spring, MD 20993-0002,<PHONE_NUMBER> or
Stephen Ripley, Center for Biologics Evaluation and Research, Food and
Drug Administration, 10903 New Hampshire Ave., Bldg. 71, Rm. 7301,
Silver Spring, MD 20993,<PHONE_NUMBER>.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

I. Background

    Each year, FDA receives over 2 million medical device reports
(MDRs) of suspected device-related deaths, serious injuries, and
malfunctions. The MDR Program is one of the postmarket surveillance
tools that FDA uses to monitor device performance, detect potential
device-related safety issues, and contribute to benefit-risk
assessments. Malfunction reports represent most of the MDRs received by
FDA on an annual basis. As part of FDA's postmarket surveillance for

devices, the Agency reviews the MDRs submitted by both mandatory and
voluntary reporters.
    The VMSR Program (the Program) began in 2018 when FDA issued a
notification in the Federal Register of August 17, 2018 (83 FR 40973)
of an order granting an alternative under 21 CFR 803.19 that permits
manufacturers of devices in eligible product codes to report certain
device malfunction MDRs in summary form on a quarterly basis, subject
to the conditions of the alternative. The Program is intended to
streamline reporting for device malfunctions as outlined in the Medical
Device User Fee Amendments of 2017 (MDUFA IV) Commitment Letter. As
such, it is intended to yield benefits for FDA, the public, and
manufacturers, such as increasing transparency for the public, helping
FDA to process certain malfunction reports more efficiently, allowing
both FDA and the public to identify malfunction trends more readily,
and reducing the burden on manufacturers. FDA implemented the Program
only after the Agency had conducted a pilot program \1\ that
demonstrated the value of a program for summary medical device
reporting on malfunctions to public health, better use of Agency
resources, and promotion of public transparency.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \1\ See Pilot Program for Medical Device Reporting on
Malfunctions, 80 FR 50010.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    This draft guidance describes and clarifies several aspects of the
Program. The draft guidance includes information on FDA's approach to
determining the eligibility of product codes for the Program and the
conditions for submitting MDRs for device malfunctions in summary
format under the Program. The draft guidance also includes information
on how manufacturers may submit information in the summary reporting
format, including instructions on how to complete applicable sections
of Form FDA 3500A.
    This draft guidance is being issued consistent with FDA's good
guidance practices regulation (21 CFR 10.115). The draft guidance, when
finalized, will represent the current thinking of FDA on ``Voluntary
Malfunction Summary Reporting (VMSR) Program for Manufacturers.'' It
does not establish any rights for any person and is not binding on FDA
or the public. You can use an alternative approach if it satisfies the
requirements of the applicable statutes and regulations.

II. Electronic Access

    Persons interested in obtaining a copy of the draft guidance may do
so by downloading an electronic copy from the internet. A search
capability for all Center for Devices and Radiological Health guidance
documents is available at https://www.fda.gov/medical-devices/device-advice-comprehensive-regulatory-assistance/guidance-documents-medical-devices-and-radiation-emitting-products. This guidance document is also
available at https://www.regulations.gov, https://www.fda.gov/regulatory-information/search-fda-guidance-documents or https://www.fda.gov/vaccines-blood-biologics/guidance-compliance-regulatory-information-biologics. Persons unable to download an electronic copy of
``Voluntary Malfunction Summary Reporting (VMSR) Program for
Manufacturers'' may send an email request to [email protected]
to receive an electronic copy of the document. Please use the document
number 21007 and complete title to identify the guidance you are
requesting.

III. Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995

    While this guidance contains no new collection of information, it
does refer to previously approved FDA collections of information.
Therefore, clearance by the Office of Management and Budget (OMB) under
the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 (PRA) (44 U.S.C. 3501-3521) is not
required for this guidance. The previously approved collections of
information are subject to review by OMB under the PRA. The collections
of information in the following FDA regulations, guidance, and forms
have been approved by OMB as listed in the following table:

------------------------------------------------------------------------
 21 CFR part; guidance; or FDA                             OMB  control
              form                        Topic                 No.
------------------------------------------------------------------------
803............................  Medical Devices;              0910-0437
                                  Medical Device
                                  Reporting;
                                  Manufacturer
                                  reporting, importer
                                  reporting, user
                                  facility reporting,
                                  distributor reporting.
820............................  Current Good                  0910-0073
                                  Manufacturing Practice
                                  (CGMP); Quality System
                                  (QS) Regulation.
------------------------------------------------------------------------

    Dated: December 5, 2022.
Lauren K. Roth,
Associate Commissioner for Policy.
[FR Doc. 2022-26729 Filed 12-8-22; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4164-01-P


                       UNITED STATES ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY
                      NATIONAL VEHICLE AND FUEL EMISSIONS LABORATORY
                                   2000 TRAVERWOOD ROAD
                                   ANN ARBOR, MI  48105

May 4, 2012
                                                         OFFICE OF
                                                      AIR AND RADIATION

MEMORANDUM

SUBJECT:	Fuel Use with Dosing for DPF Regeneration

FROM:	Lauren Steele, Office of Transportation and Air Quality

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
TO:		Docket EPA-HQ-OAR-2011-1032

Regeneration Frequency
      During both active automatic and parked manual diesel particulate filter (DPF) regenerations, emission rates may increase for some pollutants, especially nitrogen oxides (NOX) when NOx-reducing aftertreatment devices are not present downstream of the DPF. Because of the potential effect on emissions, engine manufacturers are allowed to provide frequency factors that adjust for the average excess emissions during DPF regeneration, as part of the certification process. During a series of certification tests, the DPF regeneration frequency represents the fraction of tests during which an automatic active regeneration occurs. Passive regenerations would not be counted in this frequency.  Table 1 summarizes some information from EPA certification data regarding DPF regeneration frequency factors (FreqDPF), for two model years and two types of test cycles.
Table 1:  Frequency Factors for Certified Engines
Test Cycle
Model Year
Low FreqDPF
Average FreqDPF
High FreqDPF
Urban
2008
Near zero
4.8 %
Near 10 %
Highway
2008
Near zero
7.1 %
Near 17 %
Urban
2011
Near zero
3.0 %
Near 11 %
Highway
2011
Near zero
4.9 %
Near 18 % [a]
      [a] Excluding one outlier in this set with FreqDPF over 60%
      It is difficult to translate this information into an over-the-road DPF regeneration frequency. We do not have information about the duration in minutes of regenerations that occur during test cycles, nor can we translate a typical 40-minute test cycle into an equivalent over-the-road driving distance.  However, EPA has information from fire chiefs that indicates many fire trucks are experiencing regeneration intervals of approximately 20-30 engine hours.  Further, EPA has learned that individual regeneration events on fire trucks are often estimated to have a duration of between 20 to 40 minutes: closer to 20 minutes for automatic active regenerations, closer to 40 minutes for manual active regenerations.  From the available duty cycle data for emergency vehicles, we observe that typical annual engine hours range from about 300 hours per year for some rural emergency vehicles, to over 1,600 engine hours for some urban emergency vehicles, with a middle range vehicle running about 1,200 engine hours over a year. From this information, some regeneration frequencies can be derived, though these do not have any correlation to any frequency factor that may be associated with the engine certification for these vehicles.
      Table 2 presents some estimates of the number of regeneration events an emergency vehicle may experience if it had a DPF regeneration interval of 25 engine hours with varying annual operating hours. Assuming that an average regeneration event is estimated to last for 30 minutes, the last row of Table 2 shows this would mean that about two percent of the engine's total annual operating time would be spent regenerating.
Table 2:  Estimated In-Use Emergency Vehicle Regeneration Events

Low Engine Hours
Middle Engine Hours
High Engine Hours
Annual Engine Hours
300
1,200
1,600
Annual Regeneration Events
12
47
63
Percent Operating Time Regenerating
2 %
2 %
2 %

Estimated Effects on Regeneration Frequency from This Action
      As a result of this rulemaking, it is possible that some manufacturers will submit applications for AECD's or field modifications with liberalized parameters under which automatic active and/or parked manual regenerations may occur, for engines on emergency vehicles.  The frequency of DPF regeneration in use may thus increase for these vehicles.
      If a requested modification does not include any recalibration of engine parameters, this simple increase in regeneration frequency would be associated with a decrease in the duration of each regeneration event. This would be expected because the shorter time interval would lead to a reduced soot loading at the time the regeneration is initiated, which would take less time to oxidize.
      It is also possible that manufacturers may submit requests for engine recalibrations that enable more frequent passive regeneration and rely less on active regeneration, thereby reducing the frequency of automatic active and/or manual active regenerations.
      For purposes of this analysis, EPA is providing an illustrative example of a fire truck that typically undergoes an automatic active regeneration every 25 engine hours, and it receives an approved field modification so that it may regenerate more frequently. Using this example, we illustrate the effect that more frequent manual active regenerations and/or automatic active regenerations may have on the number of regeneration events occurring on a truck with 1,200 annual operating hours.  In Table 3, we show the increased number of events if the interval between regenerations decreases to 12 engine hours in one case and 8 engine hours in another case.  In this example, we also consider that the average duration of a single regeneration event may decrease from 30 to 25 or 20 minutes.
Table 3:  Estimated Change in Emergency Vehicle Regeneration Events

                               12-Hour Interval
                                8-hour Interval
Annual Regeneration Events
                                      97
                                      97
                                      143
                                      144
Event Duration
                                    25 min
                                    20 min
                                    25 min
                                    20 min
Percent Operating Time Regenerating
                                     3.4 %
                                     2.7 %
                                     5.0 %
                                     4.0 %
      From this example, we have shown that some increases in regeneration frequency may result from this rule. In a vehicle whose active regenerations are enabled with fuel dosing, this type of modification could lead to increased fuel use from dosing. However, we do not have information about the likelihood of this type of modification, and it is quite possible that some engine manufacturers may prefer solutions that increase passive regeneration, or solutions that generate the extra heat needed for regeneration by means other than fuel dosing.
Fuel Use from Dosing
      Where DPF systems employ fuel dosing to enable active automatic regenerations, the active regeneration event can affect the vehicle's fuel consumption. Some operators have reported that vehicle fuel economy is poorer on vehicles with frequent active regenerations than on previous vehicle models, though this would vary among makes and models of vehicles.
      As described in the preamble, only some control systems employ fuel dosing as a strategy to initiate active regeneration. There is very limited information about the amount of fuel used during this process. Based on anecdotal information and phone conversations, EPA estimates that fuel use for an individual active regeneration event with dosing is typically between 0.5 and 1.0 gallon. In extreme cases such as sub-zero ambient temperatures, the supplemental fuel from DPF dosing on some vehicles could easily be in excess of a gallon.
Estimated Effects on Fuel Use from This Action
      If a manufacturer requests an AECD or field modification that would increase the number of active regenerations during a given operating period, and if the demand for regenerations is not reduced through recalibration, then it is uncertain whether or how much fuel consumption would increase on a vehicle that uses a fuel dosing strategy for regenerating its DPF.  Potential increases in fuel use from dosing could be mitigated by the expected decrease in the duration of regeneration events, and by enabling regenerations with other adjustments that could reduce the need for supplemental fuel to generate the heat needed for DPF regeneration.
      To illustrate a case where an emergency vehicle has increased fuel use from dosing related to regenerations, we have estimated the additional fuel use for a truck with a dosing strategy where its regeneration interval is decreased from 25 to eight engine hours, due to the increased availability of operator-commanded regenerations.  In this example, we assume a single regeneration consumes approximately half a gallon of supplemental fuel. As presented in Table 4, if this truck has average engine operating hours of 1,200 per year, and if it undergoes a manual regeneration every 8 engine hours instead of every 25 hours, it would experience an increase of 94 regeneration events, under the above assumptions.  If the amount of supplemental fuel use remained unchanged under the new regime (a conservative assumption) then potentially this truck could consume an additional 47 gallons of fuel per year from the increased frequency of regenerations alone.
Table 4: Fuel Use from Dosing with Increased Regeneration Frequency
1,200 Annual Engine Hours
                               25-Hour Interval
                               12-Hour Interval
                                8-Hour Interval
Annual Regeneration Events
                                      47
                                      96
                                      140
Fuel Dose per Regeneration (Gallons)
                                      0.5
                                      1.0
                                      0.5
                                      0.5
Annual Fuel Use from Dosing (Gallons)
                                      24
                                      47
                                      48
                                      71

Cost Estimates
      Table 5 below presents a summary of cost estimates for this exercise. Estimates are provided for a vehicle with annual engine operating hours of 300, 1,200, and 1,600.
Table 5: Fuel Costs from Dosing with Increased Regeneration Frequency

                               25-Hour Interval
                               12-Hour Interval
                                8-Hour Interval
Fuel Dose per Regeneration Event (Gallons)
                                      0.5
                                      1.0
                                      0.5
                                      0.5
Annual Dosing Fuel with 300 Engine Hours (Gallons)
                                      6.0
                                      12
                                      12
                                      18
Annual Cost of Dosing (at $4/gal)
                                     $ 24
                                     $ 47
                                     $ 48
                                     $ 71
Annual Dosing Fuel with 1,200 Engine Hours (Gallons)
                                      24
                                      47
                                      48
                                      71
Annual Cost of Dosing (at $4/gal)
                                     $ 94
                                     $190
                                     $ 190
                                     $ 280
Annual Dosing Fuel with 1,600 Engine Hours (Gallons)
                                      31
                                      63
                                      64
                                      94
Annual Cost of Dosing (at $4/gal)
                                     $ 130
                                     $250
                                     $ 260
                                     $ 380
      As shown in Table 5, estimating that ultra low sulfur diesel fuel costs about four dollars a gallon, a vehicle operating 1,200 hours a year with an average regeneration interval of 12 hours could incur supplemental fuel costs related to dosing of about $190 per year, or an increase of almost $100 annually over the base case with the 25 engine hour regeneration interval.
      As noted above, EPA believes these estimates are conservative, because the amount of fuel used per regeneration event would likely decrease with increasing frequency.


[Federal Register Volume 80, Number 94 (Friday, May 15, 2015)]
[Proposed Rules]
[Pages 27883-27884]
[FR Doc No: 2015-11800]

=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY

40 CFR Part 300

[EPA-HQ-SFUND-1986-0005; FRL-9927-73-Region 5]

National Oil and Hazardous Substances Pollution Contingency Plan;
National Priorities List Deletion of the Burrows Sanitation Superfund
Site

AGENCY: Environmental Protection Agency.

ACTION: Proposed rule; notice of intent.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) Region 5 is
issuing a Notice of Intent to Delete the Burrows Sanitation Superfund
Site located in Hartford Township, Van Buren County, Michigan from the
National Priorities List (NPL) and requests public comments on this
proposed action. The NPL, promulgated pursuant to section 105 of the
Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation, and Liability Act
(CERCLA) of 1980, as amended, is an appendix of the National Oil and
Hazardous Substances Pollution Contingency Plan (NCP). EPA and the
State of Michigan, through the Michigan Department of Environment
Quality (MDEQ), have determined that all appropriate response actions
under CERCLA have been completed. However, this deletion does not
preclude future actions under Superfund.

DATES: Comments must be received by June 15, 2015.

ADDRESSES: Submit your comments, identified by Docket ID No. EPA-HQ-
SFUND-1986-0005, by one of the following methods:
     http://www.regulations.gov: Follow online instructions for
submitting comments.
     Email: Jeffrey Gore, Remedial Project Manager, at
<EMAIL_ADDRESS>or Cheryl Allen, Community Involvement
Coordinator, at<EMAIL_ADDRESS>     Fax: Gladys Beard, NPL Deletion Process Manager, at (312)
697-2077.
     Mail: Jeffrey Gore, Remedial Project Manager, U.S.
Environmental Protection Agency (SR-6J), 77 West Jackson Boulevard,
Chicago, IL 60604,<PHONE_NUMBER>, or Cheryl Allen, Community
Involvement Coordinator, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (SI-7J),
77 West Jackson Boulevard, Chicago, IL 60604,<PHONE_NUMBER> or (800)
621-8431.
     Hand delivery: Cheryl Allen, Community Involvement
Coordinator, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (SI-7J), 77 West
Jackson Boulevard, Chicago, IL 60604. Such deliveries are only accepted
during the docket's normal hours of operation, and special arrangements
should be made for deliveries of boxed information. The normal business
hours are Monday through Friday, 8:30 a.m. to 4:30 p.m. CST, excluding
federal holidays.
    Instructions: Direct your comments to Docket ID No. EPA-HQ-SFUND-
1986-0005. EPA's policy is that all comments received will be included
in the public docket without change and may be made available online at
http://www.regulations.gov, including any personal information
provided, unless the comment includes information claimed to be
Confidential Business Information (CBI) or other information whose
disclosure is restricted by statute. Do not submit information that you
consider to be CBI or otherwise protected through http://www.regulations.gov or email. The http://www.regulations.gov Web site
is an ``anonymous access'' system, which means EPA will not know your
identity or contact information unless you provide it in the body of
your comment. If you send an email comment directly to EPA without
going through http://www.regulations.gov, your email address will be
automatically captured and included as part of the comment that is
placed in the public docket and made available on the Internet. If you
submit an electronic comment, EPA recommends that you include your name
and other contact information in the body of your comment and with any
disk or CD-ROM you submit. If EPA cannot read your comment due to
technical difficulties and cannot contact you for clarification, EPA
may not be able to consider your comment. Electronic files should avoid
the use of special characters, any form of encryption, and be free of
any defects or viruses.
    Docket: All documents in the docket are listed in the http://www.regulations.gov index. Although listed in the index, some
information may not be publicly available, e.g., CBI or other
information whose disclosure is restricted by statute. Certain other
material, such as copyrighted material, will be publicly available only
in the hard copy. Publicly available docket materials are available
either electronically at http://www.regulations.gov or in hard copy at:
     U.S. Environmental Protection Agency--Region 5, 77 West
Jackson Boulevard, Chicago, IL 60604, Phone:<PHONE_NUMBER>, Hours:
Monday through Friday, 8:30 a.m. to 4:30 p.m. CST, excluding federal
holidays.
     Harford Public Library, 15 Franklin Street, Hartford, MI
49057, Phone:<PHONE_NUMBER>, Hours: Monday through Wednesday, 10:00
a.m. to 7:00 p.m., Thursday and Friday 10:00 a.m. to 5:00 p.m.,
Saturday 10:00 a.m. to 5:00 p.m.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Jeffrey Gore, Remedial Project
Manager, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (SR-6J), 77 West Jackson
Boulevard, Chicago, IL 60604,<PHONE_NUMBER>, or<EMAIL_ADDRESS>
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: In the ``Rules and Regulations'' section of
today's Federal Register, we are publishing a direct final Notice of
Deletion of the Burrows Sanitation Superfund Site without prior Notice
of Intent to Delete because we view this as a noncontroversial decision
and anticipate no adverse comment. We have explained our reasons for
this deletion in the preamble to the direct final Notice of Deletion,
and those reasons are incorporated herein. If we receive no adverse
comment(s) on this deletion action, we will not take further action on
this Notice of Intent to Delete. If we receive adverse comment(s), we
will withdraw the direct final Notice of Deletion, and it will not take
effect. We will, as appropriate, address all public comments in a
subsequent final Notice of Deletion based on this Notice of Intent to
Delete. We will not institute a second comment period on this Notice of
Intent to Delete. Any parties interested in commenting must do so at
this time.
    For additional information, see the direct final Notice of Deletion
which is located in the ``Rules and Regulations'' section of this
Federal Register.

List of Subjects in 40 CFR Part 300

    Environmental protection, Air pollution control, Chemicals,
Hazardous substances, Hazardous waste, Intergovernmental relations,
Penalties, Reporting and recordkeeping requirements, Superfund, Water
pollution control, and Water supply.

    Authority: 33 U.S.C. 1321(d); 42 U.S.C. 9601-9657; E.O. 13626,
77 FR 56749, 3CFR, 2013 Comp., p. 306; E.O. 12777, 56 FR 54757, 3
CFR, 1991 Comp., p. 351; E.O. 12580, 52 FR 2923, 3 CFR, 1987 Comp.,
p. 193.

    Dated: April 30, 2015.
Susan Hedman,
Regional Administrator, Region 5.
[FR Doc. 2015-11800 Filed 5-14-15; 8:45 am]
 BILLING CODE 6560-50-P