                          SUPPORTING STATEMENTPART A

                 PRODUCTION OUTLOOK REPORTS FOR UN-REGISTERED
                           RENEWABLE FUELS PRODUCERS

A.	JUSTIFICATION

1.	Identification of the Information Collection

	a.	Title:   Production Outlook Reports for Un-Registered Renewable Fuels Producers; EPA ICR No.  2409.02; OMB Control Number 2060-0640

	b. 	Short characterization:

	 With this information collection request (ICR), we are seeking permission to accept production outlook reports from domestic or foreign renewable fuel producers who are not currently regulated parties under the RFS2 program.  The respondents for this ICR are not regulated parties under the RFS2 program and are therefore, not required to register or report under the RFS2 regulations.  Submission of production outlook information to EPA under this ICR will be on a voluntary basis.

      The information that respondents provide will allow EPA to more accurately project cellulosic biofuel volumes for the following calendar year, and these volume projections will form the basis of the percentage standards EPA sets under the RFS2 program.  Without information from these respondents, EPA's volume projections are more likely to fall below actual projection volumes.  Under such circumstances, actual supply for cellulosic biofuel will exceed the demand created by the standards EPA sets, and the value of cellulosic biofuel Renewable Identification Numbers (RINs) will fall.  RINs are marketable credits that correspond to a given volume of renewable fuel.  Since RIN market price directly affects the economic viability of cellulosic biofuel production, low RIN prices could present economic difficulties to producers.  Thus, it is in the interests of these respondents to provide this information to EPA, as doing so could ensure that the market price of RINs appropriately reflects the value of their cellulosic biofuel.  This information also serves a more general program purpose, because it will assist EPA in setting the annual RFS2 standards more accurately for biomass-based diesel, advanced biofuel, and total renewable fuel.  Compiling this information may also assist respondents with their planning and compliance activities.  We believe that many parties would wish to submit this information in order to receive better assistance in understanding and complying with the RFS2 regulations.

      We anticipate that approximately 35 parties will elect to participate in this information collection. The format for submitting the production outlook information to EPA would follow the "RFS2 Production Outlook Form, Report Form ID: RFS0900, EPA external number 5900-283." Reporting by regulated parties is covered under the RFS2 ICR, OMB Control No. 2060-0640. A copy of the current RFS0900 form and its instructions are available at:

         * Instructions:  www.epa.gov/otaq/regs/fuels/rfs0900.pdf
         * Form:  www.epa.gov/otaq/regs/fuels/rfs0900.xls

.

2.  Need For, and Use of, the Collection

      a. Authority for the Collection

	Sections 114 and 208 of the Clean Air Act (CAA), 42 U.S.C. §§ 7414 and 7542, authorize EPA to require recordkeeping and reporting regarding enforcement of the provisions of Title II of the CAA.   This voluntary collection of information is related to the RFS2 program.

	b. 	Practical Utility/Uses of the Data

	As discussed above in "Short Characterization," collection of this information will assist EPA in setting accurate annual standards under the RFS2 rule and will assist respondents with their planning and compliance activities.

3.  Non-duplication, Consultation, and other Collection Criteria

	a. 	Non-duplication

	Efforts have been made to eliminate duplication in this information collection.

      b. 	Public Notice

	EPA is seeking comment on reporting requirements via Notice.  We have also docketed a copy of our draft ICR supporting statement

	c. 	Consultations

	We have drawn upon our experience with RFS2, and with similar fuels regulations to develop the estimates in this supporting statement.  We are soliciting comments on our estimates via the Federal Register notice and have prepared this document for the public docket.

	d. 	Effects of Less Frequent Data Collection

	This is a voluntary information collection.  If EPA could not collect this information, then both the respondent and the Agency would be disadvantaged.  EPA would base its RFS2 standard setting on incomplete information, and this in turn would have a negative effect upon the respondents.  Collecting this information would allow EPA to assist the respondents in compliance, as the respondents would be subject to the RFS2 regulations in the future.

	e. 	General Guidelines

	This rule does exceed the OMB guidelines. EPA requests an exception to the OMB guidelines that agencies may only require records to be maintained for no more than three years. Records can be kept either electronically or on paper. EPA needs to make sure regulated parties keep records long enough to be evaluated for compliance during this time period.  Section 40 CFR Part 80.1454(l) requires record retention for five years from the date the records were created.

	f. 	Confidentiality

	We will inform respondents that they may assert claims of business confidentiality (CBI) for information they submit. Any information claimed as confidential will be treated in accordance with 40 CFR Part 2 and established Agency procedures.  Information that is received without a claim of confidentiality may be made available to the public without further notice to the submitter under 40 CFR § 2.203.

      g. 	Sensitive Information

	This information collection does not require submission of any sensitive information.

4.	The Respondents and the Information Requested

	a.	Respondents/with NAICS and SIC Codes

      The respondents to this information collection are renewable fuel producers who are expected to fall under the general category of petroleum refineries (324110/2911), ethyl alcohol manufacturers (325193/2869), and/or other basic organic chemical manufacturing (325199/2869).  We expect that 35 parties elect to participate in this information collection.  (Since this information collection is voluntary in nature, the actual number is determined by the respondents themselves.)

	b.	Information Requested

	The information requested includes the information collected on the RFS0900 form.  Parties may submit some, or all, of the information and submission of the information is voluntary. Parties do not have to use the form, but we plan to provide it as a convenience for those who wish to use it.

5.  	The Information Collected, Agency Activities, Collection Methodology, and Information Management

	a.	Agency Activities

      The Agency may contact respondents if there is a question about their submission.  We already perform this activity for required reports submitted under the RFS2 program and do not anticipate that this will add any significant burden.

	b. 	Collection and Methodology and Management

	We anticipate accepting this information in various formats, including electronically.  Information claimed as CBI will be stored in appropriately controlled areas.

	c.	Small Entity Flexibility

	This collection will not adversely affect small entities.  This collection is a voluntary collection and there will be no adverse consequences if a party elects not to submit the information.

	d.	Collection Schedule

	This would be a voluntary collection and, as result, this collection is not subject to any set collection schedule.  Respondents may submit all, or some, of the information on the production outlook report at will.

6.	ESTIMATING THE BURDEN AND COST OF THE COLLECTION

 	(a) ESTIMATING THE RESPONDENT BURDEN

We drew upon experience implementing similar regulations among the same entities to develop estimates of the burden associated with this collection.

      b.	Estimating the Respondent Burden and Cost

	Three labor categories are involved:  managerial (includes legal and professional review), technical, and clerical. The estimates used the Bureau of Labor Statistics figures from "National Industry-Specific Occupational Employment & Wage Estimate "Petroleum and Coal Products Manufacturing" (May 2011), with a 3% annual inflation factor applied to bring the values to the present.  Using this method, the following wages and benefits apply by category:

Wages and Benefits

Managerial    		$67.44   per hour
Technical		$65.56   per hour
Clerical		$22.17   per hour
Doubling for company overhead beyond wages and benefits, and for convenience, rounding up to the dollar, gives the following rates for this ICR:

Total Employer Cost

Managerial		$135.00 per hour
Technical		$132.00 per hour
Clerical		 $ 45.00 per hour

	It is assumed that for each hour of activity the mix will be about 0.1 hour managerial, 0.7 hour technical, and 0.2 hour clerical.  This gives an average labor cost of $115 per hour rounded up, which will be used in this ICR. This collection includes no annualized capital or operation and maintenance cost.

                             Number of Respondents
                       Number of Reports per Respondent
                          Annual Hours per Response*

                               Cost per Response
                                  @ $115/hr.
                               Total Hours/Year
                                  Total Cost
                              In Dollars/Year ($)
                                      35
                                       1
                                       4
                                    460.00
                                      140
                                   16,100.00
      * We believe that each report would take up to 12 hours to complete  at $115/hour, and  have divided 12 by three in order to determine an annual burden (over the three year period covered by this ICR).

	c.  	Estimating the Agency Burden and Cost

 	This is a voluntary information collection.  This activity will present no significant, quantifiable burden to the Agency.  We have drawn upon our experiences with the Renewable Fuel program and estimate no more than 35 notifications with an annual burden of 35 burden hours per year and for three years 105 burden hours.  We have one full-time GS-13 technical worker working two hours per response.

 	The Agency burden consists of a GS-13 technical worker costs at $89.94 an hour including overhead, for an Agency burden of $89.94 per response. With an annual total of $3,148 rounded to the nearest dollar.

       These estimates are derived from "OPM Salary Table 2014-DCB," effective January 2014.  This table may be found at http://www.opm.gov/policy-data-oversight/pay-leave/salaries-wages/salary-tables/pdf/2014/DCB.pdf.  The extreme of step 10 was assumed for all categories.  All values were multiplied by 1.6 (which is a common factor utilized in ICRs to account for overhead costs). We rounded the resulting dollar value to the nearest tenth.

	d.	Estimating the Respondent Universe

	We were able to estimate the number of regulated entities drawing upon experience regulating the same or similar entities and the number of reports submitted during the last collection period.
	e.	Bottom Line Burden Hours and Costs

	From "Estimating the Respondent Burden and Cost," we estimate the following totals:

TOTAL NO. OF RESPONDENTS:    	35
TOTAL NO. OF RESPONSES:		35
TOTAL ANNUAL HOURS:    	    	140
TOTAL ANNUAL COST:  			$16,100

	f.	Reason for Change in Burden

	There is no increase of hours in the total estimated respondent burden compared with the ICR currently approved by OMB. The respondent universe and responses also remained the same in this collection.  There was in increase in cost to the industry of
$ 6,160 per year due to better numbers used to calculate the industry burden and to account for inflation.

	g.	Burden Statement

	The annual public reporting and recordkeeping burden for this collection of information is estimated to be 4 hours per response.  Burden means the total time, effort, or financial resources expended by persons to generate, maintain, retain, or disclose or provide information to or for a Federal agency.  This includes the time needed to review instructions; develop, acquire, install, and utilize technology and systems for the purposes of collecting, validating, and verifying information, processing and maintaining information, and disclosing and providing information; adjust the existing ways to comply with any previously applicable instructions and requirements; train personnel to be able to respond to a collection of information; search data sources; complete and review the collection of information; and transmit or otherwise disclose the information.  An agency may not conduct or sponsor, and a person is not required to respond to, a collection of information unless it displays a currently valid OMB control number.  The OMB control numbers for EPA's regulations are listed in 40 CFR part 9 and 48 CFR chapter 15.

 	To comment on the Agency's need for this information, the accuracy of the provided burden estimates, and any suggested methods for minimizing respondent burden, including the use of automated collection techniques, EPA has established a public docket for this ICR under Docket ID number EPA-HQ-OAR-2005-0161, which is available for online viewing at www.regulations.gov, or in person viewing at the Air Docket in the EPA Docket Center in Washington, DC (EPA/DC).  The docket is located in the EPA West Building, 1301 Constitution Avenue, NW, Room 3334, and is open from 8:30 a.m. to 4:30 p.m., Eastern Standard Time, Monday through Friday, excluding legal holidays.  The telephone number for the Reading Room is<PHONE_NUMBER>, and the telephone number for the Air Docket is<PHONE_NUMBER>.
 	You may use www.regulations.gov to submit or view public comments, access the index listing of the contents of the public docket, and to access those documents in the public docket that are available electronically.  When in the system, select "search," then key in the Docket ID Number EPA-HQ-OAR-2005-0161.  Also, you can send comments to the Office of Information and Regulatory Affairs, Office of Management and Budget, 725 17th Street, NW, Washington, D.C. 20503, Attention: Desk Officer for EPA.  Please include the EPA Docket ID Number EPA-HQ-OAR-2005-0161 and OMB Control Number 2060-0640 in any correspondence.


[Federal Register Volume 83, Number 117 (Monday, June 18, 2018)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Pages 28154-28155]
[FR Doc No: 2018-12970]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY

Coast Guard

33 CFR Part 165

[Docket No. USCG-2018-0542]

Safety Zones; Fireworks Displays in the Fifth Coast Guard
District

AGENCY: Coast Guard, DHS.

ACTION: Notice of enforcement of regulations; changes of enforcement.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Coast Guard will enforce two safety zones for fireworks
displays: the first taking place over the Chesapeake Bay, at Chesapeake
Beach, MD, on June 30, 2018 (an alternate date on July 3, 2018) and the
second over the Chester River, at Kent Island Narrows, MD, on July 3,
2018 (an alternate date on July 5, 2018). This action is necessary to
ensure the safety of life on navigable waterways during these fireworks
displays. Our regulation for recurring Fireworks Displays in the Fifth
Coast Guard District identifies the safety zones for these fireworks
display events. During the enforcement periods, vessels may not enter,
remain in, or transit through the safety zones unless authorized by the
Captain of the Port or designated Coast Guard patrol personnel on
scene.

DATES: The regulations in 33 CFR 165.506 will be enforced for the
location listed in the table to Sec.  165.506 at (b)(9) from 8 p.m.
through 10:30 p.m. on June 30, 2018; and in the case of inclement
weather enforcement will be from 8 p.m. through 10:30 p.m. on July 3,
2018. The regulations in 33 CFR 165.506 will be enforced for the
location listed in the table to Sec.  165.506 at (b)(24) from 8:30 p.m.
through 11 p.m. on July 3, 2018; and in the case of inclement weather
enforcement will be from 8:30 p.m. through 11 p.m. on July 5, 2018.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: If you have questions about this
notice of enforcement, call or email Mr. Ron Houck, U.S. Coast Guard
Sector Maryland-National Capital Region, Waterways Management Division;
telephone<PHONE_NUMBER>, email [email protected].

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The Coast Guard will enforce the safety zone
in the table to 33 CFR 165.506 at (b)(9) for the Town of Chesapeake
Beach, MD, fireworks display from 8 p.m. through 10:30 p.m. on June 30,
2018. If necessary due to inclement weather, the fireworks display
event will be rescheduled and the safety zone will be enforced from 8
p.m. through 10:30 p.m. on July 3, 2018. This is a slight change from
the anticipated date and times of enforcement appearing in the CFR for
this event--July 4th or the Sunday before, from 5:30 p.m. to 1 a.m.
This action is being taken to provide for the safety of life on
navigable waterways during the fireworks display. The table to Sec.
165.506 at (b)(9) specifies the location of the regulated area for this
safety zone for the Town of Chesapeake Beach, MD, fireworks display,
which encompasses portions of the Chesapeake Bay near Chesapeake Beach,
MD. As specified in Sec.  165.506(d), during the enforcement period,
vessels may not enter, remain in, or transit through the safety zone
unless authorized by the Captain of the Port Sector Maryland-National
Capital Region (COTP) or designated Coast Guard patrol personnel on
scene. The Coast Guard may be assisted by other federal, state, or
local agencies in the enforcement of the safety zone.
    The Coast Guard will enforce the safety zone in the table to 33 CFR
165.506 at (b)(24) for the Kent Island Narrows, MD, fireworks display
from 8:30 p.m. through 11 p.m. on July 3, 2018. If necessary due to
inclement weather, the fireworks display event will be rescheduled and
the safety zone will be enforced from 8:30 p.m. through 11 p.m. on July
5, 2018. This is a slight change from the anticipated date and times of
enforcement appearing in the CFR for this event--Thursday before

July 4th (observed); and or July 4th, from 5:30 p.m. to 1 a.m. This
action is being taken to provide for the safety of life on navigable
waterways during the fireworks display. Our regulation for recurring
Fireworks Displays in the Fifth Coast Guard District, Sec.  165.506,
specifies the location of the regulated area for this safety zone for
the Kent Island Narrows, MD, fireworks display, which encompasses
portions of the Chester River in Queen Anne's County, MD. As specified
in Sec.  165.506(d), during the enforcement period, vessels may not
enter, remain in, or transit through the safety zone unless authorized
by the Captain of the Port Sector Maryland-National Capital Region
(COTP) or designated Coast Guard patrol personnel on scene. The Coast
Guard may be assisted by other federal, state, or local agencies in the
enforcement of the safety zone.
    This notice of enforcement is issued under authority of 33 CFR
165.506(d) and 5 U.S.C. 552 (a). In addition to this notice of
enforcement in the Federal Register, the Coast Guard plans to provide
notification of these enforcement periods via the Local Notice to
Mariners and marine information broadcasts.

    Dated: June 13, 2018.
Joseph B. Loring,
Captain, U.S. Coast Guard, Captain of the Port Maryland-National
Capital Region.
[FR Doc. 2018-12970 Filed 6-15-18; 8:45 am]
 BILLING CODE 9110-04-P


[Federal Register Volume 85, Number 76 (Monday, April 20, 2020)]
[Notices]
[Pages 21899-21901]
[FR Doc No: 2020-08209]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

[Release No. 34-88630; File No. SR-NYSE-2020-26]

Self-Regulatory Organizations; New York Stock Exchange LLC;
Notice of Filing and Immediate Effectiveness of Proposed Rule Change To
Amend its Price List To Eliminate Certain Obsolete Fees

April 14, 2020.
    Pursuant to Section 19(b)(1) \1\ of the Securities Exchange Act of
1934 (the ``Act''),\2\ and Rule 19b-4 thereunder,\3\ notice is hereby
given that on March 31, 2020, New York Stock Exchange LLC (``NYSE'' or
the ``Exchange'') filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission
(the ``Commission'') the proposed rule change as described in Items I,
II, and III below, which Items have been prepared by the self-
regulatory organization. The Commission is publishing this notice to
solicit comments on the proposed rule change from interested persons.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \1\ 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(1).
    \2\ 15 U.S.C. 78a.
    \3\ 17 CFR 240.19b-4.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

I. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement of the Terms of Substance
of the Proposed Rule Change

    The Exchange proposes to amend its Price List to eliminate certain
obsolete fees. The Exchange proposes to implement the fee changes
effective April 1, 2020. The proposed rule change is available on the
Exchange's website at www.nyse.com, at the principal office of the
Exchange, and at the Commission's Public Reference Room.

II. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement of the Purpose of, and
Statutory Basis for, the Proposed Rule Change

    In its filing with the Commission, the self-regulatory organization
included statements concerning the purpose of, and basis for, the
proposed rule change and discussed any comments it received on the
proposed rule change. The text of those statements may be examined at
the places specified in Item IV below. The Exchange has prepared
summaries, set forth in sections A, B, and C below, of the most
significant parts of such statements.

A. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement of the Purpose of, and
Statutory Basis for, the Proposed Rule Change

1. Purpose
    The Exchange proposes to amend its Price List to eliminate certain
obsolete fees. The Exchange proposes to implement the fee changes
effective April 1, 2020.
Proposed Rule Change
    The Exchange proposes to eliminate obsolete fees for trading Floor
booth reservations, radio paging services and cellular phones, as
follows.
Next Generation Trading Floor Reservation Fee
    The Exchange offers a fee of $12,000 per position, subject to a cap
of $240,000 per member organization, to reserve Next Generation Trading
Floor booth trading positions.\4\ The fee was adopted in 2010 on
connection with the creation of the Exchange's ``Next Generation
Trading Floor.'' The Exchange has not charged the fee in over seven
years. The Exchange accordingly proposes to delete the Next Generation
Trading Floor Reservation Fee as obsolete.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \4\ See Securities Exchange Act Release No. 61672 (March 8,
2010), 75 FR 12321 (March 15, 2010) (SR-NYSE-2010-16).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

Radio Paging Service
    The Exchange offers radio paging service fees to support Floor
broker beepers of $408.50 for the unit and first channel and $139.75
for each additional channel. Floor brokers no longer use beepers, and
the Exchange has not charged the fee in over two years. The Exchange
accordingly proposes to delete the radio paging service fee as
obsolete.
Cellular Phones
    The Exchange offers an annual ongoing maintenance fee for using
Exchange-approved and provided portable phones on the trading Floor of
$240.00 per phone, plus sales tax. In 2017, the Exchange amended Rule
36 to permit Floor brokers to use non-Exchange approved and provided
portable phones properly registered with the Exchange on the trading
Floor.\5\ Exchange approved and provided portable phones were disabled
as of September 18, 2017,\6\ and the fee has not been charged since
that time. The Exchange accordingly proposes to delete the annual
portable phone maintenance fee as obsolete.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \5\ See Securities Exchange Act Release No. 81103 (July 7,
2017), 82 FR 32396 (July 13, 2017) (SR-NYSE-2017-07).
    \6\ See NYSE RB 17-03, dated July 21, 2017, available at https://www.nyse.com/publicdocs/nyse/markets/nyse/rule-interpretations/2017/NYSE%20RB%2017-03%20%20Date%20Revision.pdf.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    The proposed change is not otherwise intended to address other
issues, and the Exchange is not aware of any significant problems that
market participants would have in complying with the proposed changes.
2. Statutory Basis
    The Exchange believes that the proposed rule change is consistent
with Section 6(b) of the Act,\7\ in general, and furthers the
objectives of Sections 6(b)(4) and (5) of the Act,\8\ in particular,
because it provides for the equitable allocation of reasonable dues,
fees, and other charges among its members, issuers and other persons
using its facilities and does not unfairly discriminate between
customers, issuers, brokers or dealers, and because it is designed to
promote just and equitable principles of trade, to remove impediments
to and perfect the mechanism of a free and open market and a national
market system, and, in general, to protect investors and the public
interest.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \7\ 15 U.S.C. 78f(b).
    \8\ 15 U.S.C. 78f(b)(4) & (5).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

The Proposed Rule Change Is Reasonable
    The Exchange believes that it is reasonable to delete fees from the
Price List because the related services are no longer offered and the
fees are accordingly no longer charged. Deleting obsolete fees for
services the Exchange no longer offers would add greater clarity of the
Exchange's rules and enable market participants to more easily navigate
the Exchange's Price List.
The Proposed Rule Change Is an Equitable Allocation of Fees
    The Exchange believes the proposal equitably allocates fees among
its market participants because elimination of obsolete fees would
apply to all similarly-situated member organizations on an equal basis.
All such member organizations would continue to be subject to the same
fee structure, and access to the Exchange's market would continue to be
offered on fair and nondiscriminatory terms.
The Proposed Change Is Not Unfairly Discriminatory and Would Protect
Investors and the Public Interest
    The Exchange believes that the proposal is not unfairly
discriminatory. The proposal is not unfairly discriminatory because it
neither targets nor will it have a disparate impact on any particular
category of market participant. The proposal does not permit unfair
discrimination because elimination of obsolete fees would apply to all
similarly situated member organizations on an equal basis. In addition,
the Exchange believes that the proposed elimination of obsolete fees
would remove impediments to and perfect the mechanism of a free and
open market by eliminating references to services that are no longer
offered, thereby improving the clarity of the Exchange's rules and
enabling market participants to more easily navigate the Exchange's
Price List. The Exchange also believes that the proposed change would
protect investors and the public interest because the deletion of
obsolete fees would make the Price List more accessible and transparent
and facilitate market participants' understanding of the fees charged
for services currently offered by the Exchange.
    For the foregoing reasons, the Exchange believes that the proposal
is consistent with the Act.

B. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement on Burden on Competition

    In accordance with Section 6(b)(8) of the Act,\9\ the Exchange
believes that the proposed rule change would not impose any burden on
competition that is not necessary or appropriate in furtherance of the
purposes of the Act. Instead, as discussed above, the proposal relates
solely to elimination of obsolete fees and, as such, would not have any
impact on intra- or inter-market competition because the proposed
change is solely designed to accurately reflect the services that the
Exchange currently offers, thereby adding clarity to the Price List.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \9\ 15 U.S.C. 78f(b)(8).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

C. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement on Comments on the Proposed
Rule Change Received From Members, Participants, or Others

    No written comments were solicited or received with respect to the
proposed rule change.

III. Date of Effectiveness of the Proposed Rule Change and Timing for
Commission Action

    The foregoing rule change is effective upon filing pursuant to
Section 19(b)(3)(A) \10\ of the Act and subparagraph (f)(2) of Rule
19b-4 \11\ thereunder, because it establishes a due,

fee, or other charge imposed by the Exchange.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \10\ 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(3)(A).
    \11\ 17 CFR 240.19b-4(f)(2).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    At any time within 60 days of the filing of such proposed rule
change, the Commission summarily may temporarily suspend such rule
change if it appears to the Commission that such action is necessary or
appropriate in the public interest, for the protection of investors, or
otherwise in furtherance of the purposes of the Act. If the Commission
takes such action, the Commission shall institute proceedings under
Section 19(b)(2)(B) \12\ of the Act to determine whether the proposed
rule change should be approved or disapproved.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \12\ 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(2)(B).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

IV. Solicitation of Comments

    Interested persons are invited to submit written data, views, and
arguments concerning the foregoing, including whether the proposed rule
change is consistent with the Act. Comments may be submitted by any of
the following methods:

Electronic Comments

     Use the Commission's internet comment form (http://www.sec.gov/rules/sro.shtml); or
     Send an email to<EMAIL_ADDRESS>Please include
File Number SR-NYSE-2020-26 on the subject line.

Paper Comments

     Send paper comments in triplicate to Secretary, Securities
and Exchange Commission, 100 F Street NE, Washington, DC 20549-1090.

All submissions should refer to File Number SR-NYSE-2020-26. This file
number should be included on the subject line if email is used. To help
the Commission process and review your comments more efficiently,
please use only one method. The Commission will post all comments on
the Commission's internet website (http://www.sec.gov/rules/sro.shtml).
Copies of the submission, all subsequent amendments, all written
statements with respect to the proposed rule change that are filed with
the Commission, and all written communications relating to the proposed
rule change between the Commission and any person, other than those
that may be withheld from the public in accordance with the provisions
of 5 U.S.C. 552, will be available for website viewing and printing in
the Commission's Public Reference Room, 100 F Street NE, Washington, DC
20549, on official business days between the hours of 10:00 a.m. and
3:00 p.m. Copies of the filing also will be available for inspection
and copying at the principal office of the Exchange. All comments
received will be posted without change. Persons submitting comments are
cautioned that we do not redact or edit personal identifying
information from comment submissions. You should submit only
information that you wish to make available publicly. All submissions
should refer to File Number SR-NYSE-2020-26, and should be submitted on
or before May 11, 2020.

    For the Commission, by the Division of Trading and Markets,
pursuant to delegated authority.\13\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \13\ 17 CFR 200.30-3(a)(12).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

J. Matthew DeLesDernier,
Assistant Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2020-08209 Filed 4-17-20; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 8011-01-P


[Federal Register Volume 86, Number 31 (Thursday, February 18, 2021)]
[Notices]
[Page 10059]
[FR Doc No: 2021-03273]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission

[Project No. 14633-0033]

New England Hydropower Company, LLC Albion Hydro, LLC; Notice of
Transfer of Exemption

    1. On December 28, 2020, New England Hydropower Company, LLC,
exemptee for the Albion Dam Hydroelectric Project No. 14633, filed a
letter notifying the Commission that the project was transferred from
New England Hydropower Company, LLC to Albion Hydro, LLC. The exemption
from licensing was originally issued on September 24, 2020.\1\ The
project would be located on the Blackstone River, near the towns of
Cumberland and Lincoln, Providence County, Rhode Island. The transfer
of an exemption does not require Commission approval.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \1\ New England Hydropower Company, LLC, 172 FERC ] 62,167
(2020).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    2. Albion Hydro, LLC is now the exemptee of the Albion Dam
Hydroelectric Project No. 14633. All correspondence must be forwarded
to: Mr. Michael C. Kerr, CEO, Albion Hydro, LLC, 100 Cummings Center
Drive, Suite 451 C, Beverly, MA 01915, Phone:<PHONE_NUMBER>, Email:
<EMAIL_ADDRESS>
    Dated: February 11, 2021.
Nathaniel J. Davis, Sr.,
Deputy Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2021-03273 Filed 2-17-21; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6717-01-P


Reader's Guide CRM: Lance Wormell EPA/ OPPTS/ OPP/ SRRD Reader's Guide to the Arsenic E Docket # OPP 2006 0201 EPA has created this document to provide an organizational structure to the Arsenic. The docket index lists the captain entries sequentially, while this document lists them by subject matter. The Agency is providing the " Readers Guide" to allow the reader to more easily access and navigate the various entries contained in the Arsenic electronic docket.

Federal Register and Docket Organizational Documents:

Docket Entry 1. Federal Register Notice: Notice of Availability Docket Entry 2. Reader's Guide to the Arsenic FDMS Docket # OPP 2006 0201 Docket Entry 3. Reregistration Eligibility Decision for MSMA, DSMA, CAMA, and Cacodylic Acid ( July 31, 2006)

Docket Entry 4. BEAD Response to Organic Arsenical Public Comments ( DP # 309116) ( June 28, 2006)

Docket Entry 5. RESPONSE TO PUBLIC COMMENTS. The Environmental Fate and Effects Division's Response to Comments on EPA's Phase 3 Reregistration Eligibility Decision for Organic Arsenic Herbicide ( OPP Docket # OPP 2006 0201) ( June 27, 2006)

Docket Entry 6. Organic Arsenicals. Reviewed Acute and Chronic Dietary Exposure Assessments for the Reregistration Eligibility Decision ( RED) PC Codes: 012501, 012502, 012503, 013802 and 013803. DP Barcode: D329695 ( June 21, 2006)

Docket Entry 7. Arsenic: Final Occupational and Residential Exposure Assessment for the Reregistration Eligibility Decision Document for DMA, CAMA, MSMA and DSMA ( June 21, 2006) Docket Entry 8. RESPONSE TO PUBLIC COMMENTS. The Health Effects Division's Response to Comments on EPA's Phase 3 Reregistration Eligibility Decision Document For the Organic Arsenic Herbicides ( OPP Docket # OPP 2006 0201) PC Code: 012501, 013802, 013803, And 013806; DP Barcode D329697 ( June 21, 2006 Docket Entry 9. ORGANIC ARSENICS: Final HED Combined Chapter of the Reregistration Eligibility Decision Document ( RED). Organic Arsenics: Cacodylic Acid and Salt. PC Code 012501/ 012502; MSMA, PC Code 013802, DSMA, PC Code 013803, and CAMA, PC Code 013806. DP Barcode: D329694. ( June 21, 2006) )