[Federal Register Volume 83, Number 53 (Monday, March 19, 2018)]
[Notices]
[Page 12001]
[FR Doc No: 2018-05489]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission

Combined Notice of Filings #1

    Take notice that the Commission received the following electric
corporate filings:

    Docket Numbers: EC18-68-000.
    Applicants: Solano 3 Wind LLC.
    Description: Application of Solano 3 Wind LLC for Authorization to
Transfer Jurisdictional Facilities Under Section 203 of the Federal
Power Act.
    Filed Date: 3/13/18.
    Accession Number: 20180313-5120.
    Comments Due: 5 p.m. ET 4/3/18.

    Take notice that the Commission received the following exempt
wholesale generator filings:

    Docket Numbers: EG18-52-000.
    Applicants: CAFCo Idaho Refuse Management LLC.
    Description: Self-Certification of EG or FC of CAFCo Idaho Refuse
Management LLC.
    Filed Date: 3/13/18.
    Accession Number: 20180313-5161.
    Comments Due: 5 p.m. ET 4/3/18.

    Take notice that the Commission received the following electric
rate filings:

    Docket Numbers: ER18-445-001.
    Applicants: Entergy Services, Inc.
    Description: Tariff Amendment: Entergy Services, Inc., Amended
Service Agreements to be effective 2/12/2018.
    Filed Date: 3/12/18.
    Accession Number: 20180312-5193.
    Comments Due: 5 p.m. ET 4/2/18.

    Docket Numbers: ER18-823-000.
    Applicants: ColGreen North Shore, LLC.
    Description: Supplement to February 7, 2018 ColGreen North Shore,
LLC tariff filing (revised Asset Appendix).
    Filed Date: 3/12/18.
    Accession Number: 20180312-5219.
    Comments Due: 5 p.m. ET 4/2/18.

    Docket Numbers: ER18-994-000.
    Applicants: Targray Americas Inc.
    Description: Tariff Cancellation: Cancellation notice 2018 to be
effective 3/31/2018.
    Filed Date: 3/12/18.
    Accession Number: 20180312-5177.
    Comments Due: 5 p.m. ET 4/2/18.

    Docket Numbers: ER18-995-000.
    Applicants: Southwest Power Pool, Inc.
    Description: Sec.  205(d) Rate Filing: Attachment AE Revisions to
Clarify Registration of Load to be effective 5/11/2018.
    Filed Date: 3/12/18.
    Accession Number: 20180312-5187.
    Comments Due: 5 p.m. ET 4/2/18.

    Docket Numbers: ER18-996-000.
    Applicants: Southern California Edison Company.
    Description: Sec.  205(d) Rate Filing: Affected PTO Upgrade
Facilities Agreement Ares Nevada, LLC to be effective 3/13/2018.
    Filed Date: 3/13/18.
    Accession Number: 20180313-5000.
    Comments Due: 5 p.m. ET 4/3/18.

    Docket Numbers: ER18-998-000.
    Applicants: Uniper Global Commodities North America LLC.
    Description: Sec.  205(d) Rate Filing: Amendment to Market Based
Rate to be effective 5/12/2018.
    Filed Date: 3/13/18.
    Accession Number: 20180313-5068.
    Comments Due: 5 p.m. ET 4/3/18.

    Docket Numbers: ER18-1001-000.
    Applicants: PJM Interconnection, L.L.C.
    Description: Tariff Cancellation: Notice of Cancellation of ISA, SA
No. 4398; Queue No. X2-027 to be effective 2/13/2018.
    Filed Date: 3/13/18.
    Accession Number: 20180313-5110.
    Comments Due: 5 p.m. ET 4/3/18.

    Docket Numbers: ER18-1005-000.
    Applicants: Southwestern Electric Power Company.
    Description: Sec.  205(d) Rate Filing: SWEPCO-NTEC Brandy Branch
Tap to Darco DPA to be effective 2/21/2018.
    Filed Date: 3/13/18.
    Accession Number: 20180313-5153.
    Comments Due: 5 p.m. ET 4/3/18.

    Take notice that the Commission received the following electric
reliability filings:

    Docket Numbers: RD18-2-000.
    Applicants: North American Electric Reliability Corporation,
Western Electricity Coordinating Council.
    Description: Joint Petition of the North American Electric
Reliability Corporation and Western Electricity Coordinating Council
for Approval of Proposed Regional Reliability Standard BAL-004-WECC-3.
    Filed Date: 3/8/18.
    Accession Number: 20180308-5197.
    Comments Due: 5 p.m. ET 4/12/18.

    The filings are accessible in the Commission's eLibrary system by
clicking on the links or querying the docket number.
    Any person desiring to intervene or protest in any of the above
proceedings must file in accordance with Rules 211 and 214 of the
Commission's Regulations (18 CFR 385.211 and 385.214) on or before 5:00
p.m. Eastern time on the specified comment date. Protests may be
considered, but intervention is necessary to become a party to the
proceeding.
    eFiling is encouraged. More detailed information relating to filing
requirements, interventions, protests, service, and qualifying
facilities filings can be found at: http://www.ferc.gov/docs-filing/efiling/filing-req.pdf. For other information, call<PHONE_NUMBER>
(toll free). For TTY, call<PHONE_NUMBER>.

    Dated: March 13, 2018.
Kimberly D. Bose,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2018-05489 Filed 3-16-18; 8:45 am]
 BILLING CODE 6717-01-P


[Federal Register: March 31, 2010 (Volume 75, Number 61)]
[Notices]
[Page 16099-16100]
[DOCID:fr31mr10-64]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission

[Project No. 9907-018]

Mr. Jerry McMillan and Ms. Christine Smith; Notice of Termination
of License by Implied Surrender and Soliciting Comments, Protests, and
Motions To Intervene

March 24, 2010.
    Take notice that the following hydroelectric proceeding has been
initiated by the Commission:
    a. Type of Proceeding: Termination of license by implied surrender
    b. Project No.: P-9907-018
    c. Licensees: Mr. Jerry McMillan and Ms. Christine Smith
    d. Name of Project: Sunshine Power Project
    e. Location: The Sunshine Power Project is located on Lake Creek in
Lemhi County, Idaho.
    f. Issued Pursuant to: 18 CFR 6.4.
    g. Licensee Contact: Mr. Jerry McMillan, 1157 North Hughes Street,
Centerville, UT 84014,<PHONE_NUMBER>.
    h. FERC Contact: Kelly Houff,<PHONE_NUMBER><EMAIL_ADDRESS>    i. Deadline for filing responsive documents: April 26, 2010.
    Comments, protests, and interventions may be filed electronically
via the Internet in lieu of paper; see 18 CFR 385.2001(a)(1)(iii) and
the instructions on the Commission's Web site under the ``e-Filing''
link. The Commission strongly encourages electronic filings. Please
include the project number (P-9907-018) on any documents or motions
filed.
    The Commission's Rules of Practice and Procedure require all
intervenors filing documents with the Commission to serve a copy of
that document on each person in the official service list for the
project. Further, if an intervenor files comments or documents with the
Commission relating to the merits of an issue that may affect the
responsibilities of a particular resource agency, they must also serve
a copy of the document on that resource agency.
    j. Description of Existing Facilities: The project consists of the
following facilities: (1) An existing earthfill 10-foot-high Lake Creek
diversion dam; (2) an existing 15-inch-diameter, 2,300-foot-long buried
PVC penstock; (3) a powerhouse containing one generating unit with a
rated capacity of 110 kilowatts; (4) a 200-foot-long, 34.5-kV
transmission line connected to Idaho Power Company lines; (5) a wooden
fish ladder in a riprap-lined spillway; and (6) appurtenant facilities.
    k. Description of Proceeding: Section 6.4 of the Commission's
regulations (18 CFR 6.4) provides, among other things, that it is
deemed to be the intent of a licensee to surrender a license, if the
licensee abandons a project for a period of three years.
    The Director of Hydropower Licensing issued a 50-year license to A.
W. Brown, Co. for the Sunshine Power Project on March 20, 1987 (38 FERC
] 62,282). The project was transferred to Mr. Jerry McMillan and Ms.
Christine Smith by order on February 23, 1996 (74 FERC ] 62,092). On
January 26, 2006, Ms. Smith informed the Commission that in August of
2005, Mr. McMillan deeded Ms. Smith his interest in the Sunshine
Project. In response, on April 6, 2006, Commission staff requested Ms.
Smith file an application for transfer of license with the Secretary of
the Commission. Ms. Smith failed to file a transfer application.
    On August 13, 2007, Commission staff received a letter from Ms.
Smith stating that she had sold the project to Ms. Claudia Burkhart.
Commission staff wrote to Ms. Burkhart on August 21, 2008, stating that
she needed to file a transfer of license application with the
Commission's Secretary. Once again, no transfer application was filed.
According to Commission records, the project has not operated since
October 1, 2008, and the owner does not intend to bring the project
back into operation. On October 19, 2009, Commission staff wrote Ms.
Burkhart requesting she file either a detailed plan and schedule to
resume generation at the project along with a transfer of license
application, or a request to voluntarily surrender the license. No
response was filed. On January 13, 2010, Commission staff sent a letter
to Mr. McMillan and Ms. Smith, with a copy to Ms. Burkhart, requesting
them to show cause why the Commission should not initiate a proceeding
for terminating the license based upon implied surrender. No response
was filed to the show cause letter.
    l. This notice is available for review and reproduction at the
Commission in the Public Reference Room, Room 2A, 888 First Street,
NE., Washington, DC 20426. The filing may also be viewed on the Web at
http://www.ferc.gov using the ``eLibrary'' link. Enter the docket
number, here P-9907-018, in the docket number field to access the
document. For assistance, call toll-free 1-866-208-3676 or e-mail
<EMAIL_ADDRESS>For TTY, call<PHONE_NUMBER>. A copy is
also available for review and reproduction at the address in item g
above.
    m. Individuals desiring to be included on the Commission's mailing
list should so indicate by writing to the Secretary of the Commission.
    n. Comments, Protests, or Motions to Intervene--Anyone may submit a
protest or a motion to intervene in accordance with the requirements of
Rules of Practice and Procedure, 18 CFR 385.210, 385.211, and 385.214.
In determining the appropriate action to take, the Commission will
consider all protests filed, but only those who file a motion to
intervene in accordance with the Commission's Rules may become a party
to the proceeding. Any protests or motions to intervene must be
received on or before the specified deadline date for the particular
application.
    o. Filing and Service of Responsive Documents--All filings must (1)
bear in all capital letters the title ``PROTEST'', ``MOTION TO
INTERVENE,'' ``COMMENTS'', ``RECOMMENDATIONS FOR TERMS AND CONDITIONS:
(2) set forth in the heading the project number of the proceeding to
which the filing responds; (3) furnish the name, address, and telephone
number of the person protesting or intervening; and (4) otherwise
comply with the requirements of 18 CFR 385.2001 through 385.2005. All
comments, recommendations, or terms and conditions must set forth their
evidentiary basis and otherwise

comply with the requirements of 18 CFR 4.34(b). Any of the above
mentioned documents must be filed by providing the original and eight
copies to: The Secretary, Federal Energy Regulatory Commission, 888
First Street, NE., Washington, DC 20426. An additional copy must be
sent to Director, Division of Hydropower Administration and Compliance,
Office of Energy Projects, Federal Energy Regulatory Commission, at the
above address.
    p. Agency Comments--Federal, State, and local agencies are invited
to file comments on the described proceeding. If any agency does not
file comments within the time specified for filing comments, it will be
presumed to have no comments.

Kimberly D. Bose,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2010-7149 Filed 3-30-10; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6717-01-P


[Federal Register Volume 76, Number 162 (Monday, August 22, 2011)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Pages 52239-52241]
[FR Doc No: 2011-21052]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION

Federal Aviation Administration

14 CFR Part 97

[Docket No. 30797; Amdt. No. 3438]

Standard Instrument Approach Procedures, and Takeoff Minimums and
Obstacle Departure Procedures; Miscellaneous Amendments

AGENCY: Federal Aviation Administration (FAA), DOT.

ACTION: Final Rule.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: This establishes, amends, suspends, or revokes Standard
Instrument Approach Procedures (SIAPs) and associated Takeoff Minimums
and Obstacle Departure Procedures for operations at certain airports.
These regulatory actions are needed because of the adoption of new or
revised criteria, or because of changes occurring in the National
Airspace System, such as the commissioning of new navigational
facilities, adding new obstacles, or changing air traffic requirements.
These changes are designed to provide safe and efficient use of the
navigable airspace and to promote safe flight operations under
instrument flight rules at the affected airports.

DATES: This rule is effective August 22, 2011. The compliance date for
each SIAP, associated Takeoff Minimums, and ODP is specified in the
amendatory provisions.
    The incorporation by reference of certain publications listed in
the regulations is approved by the Director of the Federal Register as
of August 22, 2011.

ADDRESSES: Availability of matters incorporated by reference in the
amendment is as follows:

For Examination

    1. FAA Rules Docket, FAA Headquarters Building, 800 Independence
Avenue, SW., Washington, DC 20591;
    2. The FAA Regional Office of the region in which the affected
airport is located;
    3. The National Flight Procedures Office, 6500 South MacArthur
Blvd., Oklahoma City, OK 73169 or,
    4. The National Archives and Records Administration (NARA). For
information on the availability of this material at NARA, call 202-741-
6030, or go to: http://www.archives.gov/federal_register/code_of_federal_regulations/ibr_locations.html.
    Availability--All SIAPs and Takeoff Minimums and ODPs are available
online free of charge. Visit http://www.nfdc.faa.gov to register.
Additionally, individual SIAP and Takeoff Minimums and ODP copies may
be obtained from:
    1. FAA Public Inquiry Center (APA-200), FAA Headquarters Building,
800 Independence Avenue, SW., Washington, DC 20591; or
    2. The FAA Regional Office of the region in which the affected
airport is located.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Harry J. Hodges, Flight Procedure
Standards Branch (AFS-420), Flight Technologies and Programs Divisions,
Flight Standards Service, Federal Aviation Administration, Mike
Monroney Aeronautical Center, 6500 South MacArthur Blvd., Oklahoma
City, OK 73169 (Mail Address: P.O. Box 25082, Oklahoma City, OK 73125),
Telephone:<PHONE_NUMBER>.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: This rule amends Title 14 of the Code of
Federal Regulations, part 97 (14 CFR part 97), by establishing,
amending, suspending, or revoking SIAPS, Takeoff Minimums and/or ODPS.
The complete regulators description of each SIAP and its associated
Takeoff Minimums or ODP for an identified airport is listed on FAA form
documents which are incorporated by reference in this amendment under 5
U.S.C. 552(a), 1 CFR part 51, and 14 CFR 97.20. The applicable FAA
Forms are FAA Forms 8260-3, 8260-4, 8260-5, 8260-15A, and 8260-15B when
required by an entry on 8260-15A.
    The large number of SIAPs, Takeoff Minimums and ODPs, in addition
to their complex nature and the need for a special format make
publication in the Federal Register expensive and impractical.
Furthermore, airmen do not use the regulatory text of the SIAPs,
Takeoff Minimums or ODPs, but instead refer to their depiction on
charts printed by publishers of aeronautical materials. The advantages
of incorporation by reference are realized and publication of the
complete description of each SIAP, Takeoff Minimums and ODP listed on
FAA forms is unnecessary. This amendment provides the affected CFR
sections and specifies the types of SIAPs and the effective dates of
the associated Takeoff Minimums and ODPs. This amendment also
identifies the airport and its location, the procedure, and the
amendment number.

The Rule

    This amendment to 14 CFR part 97 is effective upon publication of
each separate SIAP, Takeoff Minimums and ODP as contained in the
transmittal. Some SIAP and Takeoff Minimums and textual ODP amendments
may have

been issued previously by the FAA in a Flight Data Center (FDC) Notice
to Airmen (NOTAM) as an emergency action of immediate flight safety
relating directly to published aeronautical charts. The circumstances
which created the need for some SIAP and Takeoff Minimums and ODP
amendments may require making them effective in less than 30 days. For
the remaining SIAPS and Takeoff Minimums and ODPS, an effective date at
least 30 days after publication is provided.
    Further, the SIAPs and Takeoff Minimums and ODPS contained in this
amendment are based on the criteria contained in the U.S. Standard for
Terminal Instrument Procedures (TERPS). In developing these SIAPS and
Takeoff Minimums and ODPs, the TERPS criteria were applied to the
conditions existing or anticipated at the affected airports. Because of
the close and immediate relationship between these SIAPs, Takeoff
Minimums and ODPs, and safety in air commerce, I find that notice and
public procedures before adopting these SIAPS, Takeoff Minimums and
ODPs are impracticable and contrary to the public interest and, where
applicable, that good cause exists for making some SIAPs effective in
less than 30 days.

Conclusion

    The FAA has determined that this regulation only involves an
established body of technical regulations for which frequent and
routine amendments are necessary to keep them operationally current.
It, therefore--(1) is not a ``significant regulatory action'' under
Executive Order 12866; (2) is not a ``significant rule '' under DOT
Regulatory Policies and Procedures (44 FR 11034; February 26, 1979);
and (3) does not warrant preparation of a regulatory evaluation as the
anticipated impact is so minimal. For the same reason, the FAA
certifies that this amendment will not have a significant economic
impact on a substantial number of small entities under the criteria of
the Regulatory Flexibility Act.

List of Subjects in 14 CFR Part 97

    Air Traffic Control, Airports, Incorporation by reference, and
Navigation (air).

    Issued in Washington, DC, on August 5, 2011.
John M. Allen,
Director, Flight Standards Service.

Adoption of the Amendment

    Accordingly, pursuant to the authority delegated to me, Title 14,
Code of Federal Regulations, part 97 (14 CFR part 97) is amended by
establishing, amending, suspending, or revoking Standard Instrument
Approach Procedures and/or Takeoff Minimums and/or Obstacle Departure
Procedures effective at 0902 UTC on the dates specified, as follows:

PART 97--STANDARD INSTRUMENT APPROACH PROCEDURES

0
1. The authority citation for part 97 continues to read as follows:

    Authority: 49 U.S.C. 106(g), 40103, 40106, 40113, 40114, 40120,
44502, 44514, 44701, 44719, 44721-44722.

0
2. Part 97 is amended to read as follows:

Effective 22 SEP 2011

Warren, AR, Warren Muni, Takeoff Minimums & Obstacle DP, Orig
Ottumwa, IA, Ottumwa Rgnl, ILS OR LOC RWY 31, Amdt 5B
Ottumwa, IA, Ottumwa Rgnl, RNAV (GPS) RWY 22, Orig-A, CANCELLED
Ottumwa, IA, Ottumwa Rgnl, Takeoff Minimums & Obstacle DP, Orig-A
Red Oak, IA, Red Oak Muni, Takeoff Minimums & Obstacle DP, Amdt 3
Storm Lake, IA, Storm Lake Muni, Takeoff Minimums & Obstacle DP,
Orig
Dwight, IL, Dwight, Takeoff Minimums & Obstacle DP, Orig
Pinckneyville, IL, Pinckneyville-Du Quoin, Takeoff Minimums &
Obstacle DP, Orig
Elkhart, IN, Elkhart Muni, Takeoff Minimums and Obstacle DP, Orig
Detroit, MI, Coleman A. Young Muni, ILS OR LOC RWY 15, Amdt 10
Slayton, MN, Slayton Muni, Takeoff Minimums & Obstacle DP, Orig
Florence, SC, Florence Rgnl, RNAV (GPS) RWY 9, Orig-A
Spearfish, SD, Black Hills-Clydes Ice Field, RNAV (GPS) RWY 13,
Orig-A
Spearfish, SD, Black Hills-Clydes Ice Field, RNAV (GPS) RWY 31,
Orig-A
Castroville, TX, Castroville Muni, Takeoff Minimums and Obstacle DP,
Orig
Cleveland, TX, Cleveland Muni, Takeoff Minimums and Obstacle DP,
Amdt 1
Corsicana, TX, C David Campbell Fld-Corsicana Muni, Takeoff Minimums
and Obstacle DP, Orig
Sherman, TX, Sherman Muni, Takeoff Minimums and Obstacle DP, Orig
Necedah, WI, Necedah, Takeoff Minimums and Obstacle DP, Orig

Effective 20 OCT 2011

El Dorado, AR, South Arkansas Rgnl at Goodwin Field, Takeoff
Minimums and Obstacle DP, Amdt 2
Fort Pierce, FL, St Lucie County Intl, NDB-A, Orig-C
Lawrenceville, GA, Gwinnett County-Briscoe Field, Takeoff Minimums
and Obstacle DP, Amdt 6
Livingston, MT, Mission Field, GPS RWY 22, Orig-B, CANCELLED
Livingston, MT, Mission Field, RNAV (GPS) RWY 22, Orig
Louisburg, NC, Triangle North Executive, ILS OR LOC RWY 5, Amdt 4
Louisburg, NC, Triangle North Executive, RNAV (GPS) RWY 5, Amdt 1
Louisburg, NC, Triangle North Executive, RNAV (GPS) RWY 23, Amdt 1
Louisburg, NC, Triangle North Executive, Takeoff Minimums and
Obstacle DP, Orig
Louisburg, NC, Triangle North Executive, VOR/DME-A, Amdt 2B
Red Hook, NY, Sky Park, Takeoff Minimums and Obstacle DP, Orig,
CANCELLED
Red Hook, NY, Sky Park, VOR OR GPS RWY 1, Amdt 5, CANCELLED
Gallipolis, OH, Gallia-Meigs Rgnl, VOR OR GPS-B, Amdt 1, CANCELLED
Lebanon, OH, Lebanon-Warren County, Takeoff Minimums and Obstacle
DP, Orig
Piqua, OH, Piqua Airport-Hartzell Field, Takeoff Minimums and
Obstacle DP, Orig
Holdenville, OK, Holdenville Muni, Takeoff Minimums and Obstacle DP,
Orig
Providence, RI, Theodore Francis Green State, ILS OR LOC RWY 23,
Amdt 6
Providence, RI, Theodore Francis Green State, ILS OR LOC/DME RWY 34,
Amdt 11
Providence, RI, Theodore Francis Green State, RNAV (GPS) RWY 23,
Amdt 1
Providence, RI, Theodore Francis Green State, RNAV (GPS) RWY 34,
Amdt 1
Brownwood, TX, Brownwood Rgnl, Takeoff Minimums and Obstacle DP,
Orig
Cleveland, TX, Cleveland Muni, GPS RWY 16, Orig-C, CANCELLED
Cleveland, TX, Cleveland Muni, RNAV (GPS) RWY 16, Orig
Dallas, TX, Dallas Love Field, RNAV (GPS) RWY 31R, Amdt 1
Dallas, TX, Dallas Love Field, RNAV (GPS) Z RWY 13L, Amdt 1
Gilmer, TX, Fox Stephens Field-Gilmer Muni, Takeoff Minimums and
Obstacle DP, Orig
Gruver, TX, Gruver Muni, Takeoff Minimums and Obstacle DP, Orig
Hearne, TX, Hearne Muni, RNAV (GPS) RWY 18, Orig
Hearne, TX, Hearne Muni, RNAV (GPS) RWY 36, Orig
Hearne, TX, Hearne Muni, Takeoff Minimums and Obstacle DP, Orig
Houston, TX, George Bush Intercontinental/Houston, ILS OR LOC RWY
8R; ILS RWY 8R (SA CAT II), Amdt 23B
Moses Lake, WA, Grant Co Intl, ILS OR LOC RWY 32R, Amdt 20B
Toledo, WA, Ed Carlson Memorial Field-South Lewis Co, RNAV (GPS) RWY
24, Orig-A
Chetek, WI, Chetek Muni-Southworth, Takeoff Minimums and Obstacle
DP, Orig
East Troy, WI, East Troy Muni, GPS RWY 8, Orig, CANCELLED
East Troy, WI, East Troy Muni, GPS RWY 26, Orig, CANCELLED
East Troy, WI, East Troy Muni, RNAV (GPS) RWY 8, Orig
East Troy, WI, East Troy Muni, RNAV (GPS) RWY 26, Orig
East Troy, WI, East Troy Muni, VOR/DME-A, Amdt 1
Solon Springs, WI, Solon Springs Muni, Takeoff Minimums and Obstacle
DP, Orig
Laramie, WY, Laramie Rgnl, VOR/DME RWY 12, Amdt 6A

Laramie, WY, Laramie Rgnl, VOR/DME RWY 30, Amdt 7A

[FR Doc. 2011-21052 Filed 8-19-11; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910-13-P


[Federal Register Volume 78, Number 224 (Wednesday, November 20, 2013)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Page 69543]
[FR Doc No: 2013-27773]

=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES

Food and Drug Administration

21 CFR Part 1

[Docket No. FDA-2010-N-0560]

Amendments to General Regulations of the Food and Drug
Administration; Technical Amendments

AGENCY: Food and Drug Administration, HHS.

ACTION: Final rule; technical amendments.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Food and Drug Administration (FDA or we) published a final
rule in the Federal Register on November 30, 2010, amending certain
regulations to include tobacco products, where appropriate, in light of
FDA's authority to regulate these products under the Family Smoking
Prevention and Tobacco Control Act (Tobacco Control Act). The final
rule inadvertently deleted an authority citation and language related
to the definition of ``package.'' We are restoring the inadvertent
deletions and making a corresponding technical change.

DATES: This rule is effective November 20, 2013.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Felicia Billingslea, Center for Food
Safety and Applied Nutrition (HFS-820), Food and Drug Administration,
5100 Paint Branch Pkwy., College Park, MD 20740-3835,<PHONE_NUMBER>.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: We are making technical amendments to our
regulations under 21 CFR part 1.
    In the Federal Register of November 30, 2010 (75 FR 73951), we
amended certain regulations in part 1 (21 CFR part 1), ``General
Enforcement Regulations,'' in light of our authority under the Tobacco
Control Act. The final rule, among other things:
     Revised the authority citation for part 1 by removing a
reference to section 302 of the Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act
(FD&C Act) (21 U.S.C. 332);
     Revised Sec.  1.1(c), ``General,'' by removing the terms
``package in Sec.  1.20 and of'', and
     Revised Sec.  1.20, ``Presence of mandatory label
information,'' by removing the terms ``package in Sec.  1.20 and of''.
    The preamble to the final rule explained that the revisions to part
1 reflected our authority over tobacco products under the Tobacco
Control Act (75 FR 73951 at 73952). However, the revisions
inadvertently created one inconsistency (in that other provisions in
part 1 did, in fact, rely on section 302 of the FD&C Act as part of
their legal authority) or created confusion over whether the definition
of ``package'' was limited to the regulations in part 1 or whether it
also applied to other FDA regulations.
    Therefore, through this rule, we are amending part 1 as follows:
     We are restoring section 302 of the FD&C Act to the
authority citation for part 1. Because the authority citation is
expressed in terms of the U.S. Code, the amendment is to insert ``332''
in the list of U.S. Code sections.
     We are revising Sec.  1.1(c) to restore the terms
``package in Sec.  1.20 and of''.
     We are revising Sec.  1.20 to add a cross-reference to
Sec.  1.1(c).
    Publication of this document constitutes final action of these
changes under the Administrative Procedure Act (5 U.S.C. 553). These
amendments are merely correcting inadvertent deletions. FDA, therefore,
for good cause, finds under 5 U.S.C. 553(b)(3)(B) and (d)(3) that
notice and public comment are unnecessary.

List of Subjects in 21 CFR Part 1

    Cosmetics, Drugs, Exports, Food labeling, Imports, Labeling,
Reporting and recordkeeping requirements.

    Therefore, under the Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act and under
authority delegated to the Commissioner of Food and Drugs, 21 CFR part
1 is amended as follows:

PART 1--GENERAL ENFORCEMENT REGULATIONS

0
1. The authority citation for 21 CFR part 1 is revised to read as
follows:

    Authority:  15 U.S.C. 1333, 1453, 1454, 1455, 4402; 19 U.S.C.
1490, 1491; 21 U.S.C. 321, 331, 332, 333, 334, 335a, 343, 350c,
350d, 352, 355, 360b, 362, 371, 374, 381, 382, 387, 387a, 387c, 393;
42 U.S.C. 216, 241, 243, 262, 264.

Sec.  1.1  [Amended]

0
2. Amend Sec.  1.1 by adding the phrase ``of package in Sec.  1.20
and'' after the word ``definition'' in the first sentence of paragraph
(c).

0
3. In Sec.  1.20, revise the introductory text to read as follows:

Sec.  1.20  Presence of mandatory label information.

    In the regulations specified in Sec.  1.1(c) of this chapter, the
term package means any container or wrapping in which any food, drug,
device, or cosmetic is enclosed for use in the delivery or display of
such commodities to retail purchasers, but does not include:
* * * * *

    Dated: November 14, 2013.
Leslie Kux,
Assistant Commissioner for Policy.
[FR Doc. 2013-27773 Filed 11-19-13; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4160-01-P


[Federal Register Volume 86, Number 65 (Wednesday, April 7, 2021)]
[Notices]
[Pages 18073-18076]
[FR Doc No: 2021-07131]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF LABOR

Occupational Safety and Health Administration

[Docket No. OSHA-2006-0040]

SGS North America, Inc.: Application for Expansion of Recognition
and Proposed Modification to the NRTL Program's List of Appropriate
Test Standards

AGENCY: Occupational Safety and Health Administration (OSHA), Labor.

ACTION: Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: In this notice, OSHA announces the application of SGS North
America, Inc., for expansion of recognition as a Nationally Recognized
Testing Laboratory (NRTL) and presents the agency's preliminary finding
to grant the application. Additionally, OSHA proposes to add five test
standards to the NRTL Program's list of appropriate test standards.

DATES: Submit comments, information, and documents in response to this
notice, or requests for an extension of time to make a submission, on
or before April 22, 2021.

ADDRESSES: Submit comments by any of the following methods:
    Electronically: You may submit comments and attachments
electronically at: https://www.regulations.gov, which is the Federal
eRulemaking Portal. Follow the instructions online for submitting
comments.
    Facsimile: If your comments, including attachments, are not longer
than 10 pages, you may fax them to the OSHA Docket Office at (202) 693-
1648.
    Mail, hand delivery, express mail, messenger, or courier service:
When using this method, you must submit a copy of your comments and
attachments to the OSHA Docket Office, Docket No. OSHA-2006-0040,
Occupational Safety and Health Administration, U.S. Department of
Labor, 200 Constitution Avenue NW, Washington, DC 20210. Please note:
While OSHA's docket office is continuing to accept and process
submissions by regular mail, due to the COVID-19 pandemic, the Docket
Office is closed to the public and not able to receive submissions to
the rulemaking record by express delivery, hand delivery, and messenger
service.
    Instructions: All submissions must include the agency name and the
OSHA docket number (OSHA-2006-0040). OSHA places comments and other
materials, including any personal information, in the public docket
without revision, and these materials will be available online at
http://www.regulations.gov. Therefore, the agency cautions commenters
about submitting statements they do not want made available to the
public, or submitting comments that contain personal information
(either about themselves or others) such as Social Security numbers,
birth dates, and medical data.
    Docket: To read or download comments or other material in the
docket, go to https://www.regulations.gov or the OSHA Docket Office at
the above address. All documents in the docket (including this Federal
Register notice) are listed in the https://www.regulations.gov index;
however, some information (e.g., copyrighted material) is not publicly
available to read or download through the website. All submissions,
including copyrighted material, are available for inspection through
the OSHA Docket Office.
    Extension of comment period: Submit requests for an extension of
the comment period on or before April 22, 2021 to the Office of
Technical Programs and Coordination Activities, Directorate of
Technical Support and Emergency Management, Occupational Safety and
Health Administration, U.S. Department of Labor, 200 Constitution
Avenue NW, Room N-3653, Washington, DC 20210, or by fax to (202) 693-
1644.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Information regarding this notice is
available from the following sources:
    Press inquiries: Contact Mr. Frank Meilinger, Director, OSHA Office
of Communications, U.S. Department of Labor, telephone:<PHONE_NUMBER>;
email<EMAIL_ADDRESS>    General and technical information: Contact Mr. Kevin Robinson,
Director, Office of Technical Programs and Coordination Activities,
Directorate of Technical Support and Emergency Management, Occupational
Safety and Health Administration, U.S. Department of Labor, phone:
(202) 693-2110 or email<EMAIL_ADDRESS>
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

I. Notice of the Application for Expansion

    The Occupational Safety and Health Administration is providing
notice that SGS North America, Inc. (SGS) is applying for an expansion
of current recognition as a NRTL. SGS requests the addition of five
test standards to the NRTL scope of recognition.
    OSHA recognition of a NRTL signifies that the organization meets
the requirements specified in 29 CFR 1910.7. Recognition is an
acknowledgment that the organization can perform independent safety
testing and certification of the specific products covered within the
scope of recognition. Each NRTL's scope of recognition includes: (1)
The type of products the NRTL may test, with each type specified by the
applicable test standard; and (2) the recognized site(s) that has/have
the technical capability to perform the product-testing and product-
certification activities for test standards within the NRTL's scope.
Recognition is not a delegation or grant of government authority;
however, recognition enables employers to use products approved by the
NRTL to meet OSHA standards that require product testing and
certification.
    The agency processes applications by a NRTL for initial recognition
and for an expansion or renewal of this recognition, following
requirements in Appendix A to 29 CFR 1910.7. This appendix requires
that the agency publish two notices in the Federal Register in
processing an application. In the first notice, OSHA announces the
application and provides a preliminary finding. In the second notice,
the agency provides the final decision on the application. These
notices set forth the NRTL's scope of recognition or modifications of
that scope. OSHA maintains an informational web page for each NRTL,
including SGS, which details the NRTL's scope of recognition. These
pages are available from the OSHA website at http://www.osha.gov/dts/otpca/nrtl/index.html.
    SGS currently has nine facilities (sites) recognized by OSHA for
product testing and certification, with the headquarters located at:
SGS North America, Inc., 620 Old Peachtree Road, Suwanee, Georgia
30024. A complete list of SGS's scope of recognition is available at
https://www.osha.gov/dts/otpca/nrtl/sgs.html.

II. General Background on the Application

    SGS submitted an application to OSHA to expand recognition as a
NRTL to include five additional test standards on May 16, 2019 (OSHA-
2006-0040-0058). OSHA staff performed a detailed analysis of the
application packets and reviewed other pertinent information. OSHA did
not perform any on-site reviews in relation to these applications.
    Table 1 lists the appropriate test standards found in SGS's
application for expansion for testing and certification of products
under the NRTL Program.

  Table 1--Proposed List of Appropriate Test Standards for Inclusion in
                     SGS's NRTL Scope of Recognition
------------------------------------------------------------------------
        Test standard                     Test standard title
------------------------------------------------------------------------
* UL 62841-2-1..............  Electric Motor-Operated Hand-Held Tools,
                               Transportable Tools And Lawn And Garden
                               Machinery--Part 2-1: Particular
                               Requirements for Hand-Held Drills and
                               Impact Drills.
* UL 62841-2-10.............  Electric Motor-Operated Hand-Held Tools,
                               Transportable Tools And Lawn And Garden
                               Machinery--Part 2-10: Particular
                               Requirements for Hand-Held Mixers.
* UL 62841-2-21.............  Electric Motor-Operated Hand-Held Tools,
                               Transportable Tools And Lawn And Garden
                               Machinery--Part 2-21: Particular
                               Requirements for Hand-Held Drain
                               Cleaners.
* UL 62841-3-13.............  Electric Motor-Operated Hand-Held Tools,
                               Transportable Tools And Lawn And Garden
                               Machinery--Part 3-13: Particular
                               Requirements for Transportable Drills.
* UL 60745-2-23.............  Hand-Held Motor-Operated Electric Tools--
                               Safety--Part 2-23: Particular
                               Requirements for Die Grinders and Small
                               Rotary Tools.
------------------------------------------------------------------------
* Represents the standards that OSHA proposes to add to the NRTL
  Program's List of Appropriate Test Standards.

III. Proposal To Add New Test Standards to the NRTL Program's List of
Appropriate Test Standards

    Periodically, OSHA will propose to add new test standards to the
NRTL list of appropriate test standards following an evaluation of the
test standard document. To qualify as an appropriate test standard, the
agency evaluates the document to: (1) Verify it represents a product
category for which OSHA requires certification by a NRTL; (2) verify
the document represents an end product and not a component; and (3)
verify the document defines safety test specifications (not
installation or operational performance specifications). OSHA becomes
aware of new test standards through various avenues. For example, OSHA
may become aware of new test standards by: (1) Monitoring notifications
issued by certain Standards Development Organizations; (2) reviewing
applications by NRTLs or applicants seeking recognition to include new
test standard in their scopes of recognition; and (3) obtaining
notification from manufacturers, manufacturing organizations,
government agencies, or other parties. OSHA may determine to include a
new test standard in the list, for example, if the test standard is for
a particular type of product that another test standard also covers or
it covers a type of product that no standard previously covered.
    In this notice, OSHA proposes to add five new test standards to the
NRTL Program's list of appropriate test standards. Table 2, below,
lists the test standards that are new to the NRTL Program. OSHA
preliminarily determined that these test standards are appropriate test
standards and proposes to include them in the NRTL Program's list of
appropriate test standards. OSHA seeks public comment on this
preliminary determination.

 Table 2--Standards OSHA Is Proposing To Add to the NRTL Program's List
                      of Appropriate Test Standards
------------------------------------------------------------------------
        Test standard                     Test standard title
------------------------------------------------------------------------
UL 62841-2-1................  Electric Motor-Operated Hand-Held Tools,
                               Transportable Tools And Lawn And Garden
                               Machinery--Part 2-1: Particular
                               Requirements for Hand-Held Drills and
                               Impact Drills.
UL 62841-2-10...............  Electric Motor-Operated Hand-Held Tools,
                               Transportable Tools And Lawn And Garden
                               Machinery--Part 2-10: Particular
                               Requirements for Hand-Held Mixers.
UL 62841-2-21...............  Electric Motor-Operated Hand-Held Tools,
                               Transportable Tools And Lawn And Garden
                               Machinery--Part 2-21: Particular
                               Requirements for Hand-Held Drain
                               Cleaners.
UL 62841-3-13...............  Electric Motor-Operated Hand-Held Tools,
                               Transportable Tools And Lawn And Garden
                               Machinery--Part 3-13: Particular
                               Requirements for Transportable Drills.
UL 60745-2-23...............  Hand-Held Motor-Operated Electric Tools--
                               Safety--Part 2-23: Particular
                               Requirements for Die Grinders and Small
                               Rotary Tools.
------------------------------------------------------------------------

IV. Preliminary Findings on the Application

    SGS submitted an acceptable application for expansion of the scope
of recognition. OSHA's review of the application files and pertinent
documentation indicates that SGS can meet the requirements prescribed
by 29 CFR 1910.7 for expanding the recognition to include the addition
of these five test standards for NRTL testing and certification listed
above. This preliminary finding does not constitute an interim or
temporary approval of SGS's application.
    OSHA welcomes public comment as to whether SGS meets the
requirements of 29 CFR 1910.7 for expansion of the recognition as a
NRTL. OSHA additionally welcomes comments on the proposal to add five
additional test standards to the NRTL Program's list of appropriate
test standards. Comments should consist of pertinent written documents
and exhibits. Commenters needing more time to comment must submit a
request in writing, stating the reasons for the request. Commenters
must submit the written request for an extension by the due date for
comments. OSHA will limit any extension to 10 days unless the requester
justifies a longer period. OSHA may deny a request for an extension if
the request is not adequately justified. To obtain or review copies of
the exhibits identified in this notice, as well as comments submitted
to the docket, contact the Docket Office, Room N-3653, Occupational
Safety and Health Administration, U.S. Department of Labor, at the
above address. These materials also are available online at http://www.regulations.gov under Docket No. OSHA-2006-0040.
    OSHA staff will review all comments to the docket submitted in a
timely manner and, after addressing the issues raised by these
comments, will make a recommendation to the Assistant Secretary for
Occupational Safety and Health whether to grant SGS's application for
expansion of the scope of recognition. The Assistant Secretary will
make the final decision on granting the application. In making this
decision,

the Assistant Secretary may undertake other proceedings prescribed in
Appendix A to 29 CFR 1910.7.
    OSHA will publish a public notice of the final decision in the
Federal Register.

V. Authority and Signature

    James S. Frederick, Principal Deputy Assistant Secretary of Labor
for Occupational Safety and Health, 200 Constitution Avenue NW,
Washington, DC 20210, authorized the preparation of this notice.
Accordingly, the agency is issuing this notice pursuant to Section 29
U.S.C. 655(6)(d), Secretary of Labor's Order No. 8-2020 (85 FR 58393;
Sept. 18, 2020), and 29 CFR 1905.11.

    Signed at Washington, DC, on March 31, 2021.
James S. Frederick,
Principal Deputy Assistant Secretary of Labor for Occupational Safety
and Health.
[FR Doc. 2021-07131 Filed 4-6-21; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4510-26-P


[Federal Register: July 5, 2007 (Volume 72, Number 128)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Page 36599-36601]
[DOCID:fr05jy07-7]

=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY

40 CFR Part 52

[EPA-R05-OAR-2006-0046; EPA-R05-OAR-2006-0891; EPA-R05-OAR-2006-0892;
FRL-8335-6]

Determination of Attainment, Approval and Promulgation of
Implementation Plans and Designation of Areas for Air Quality Planning
Purposes; Ohio; Correction

AGENCY: Environmental Protection Agency (EPA).

ACTION: Final rule; correcting amendment.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: This document corrects an error in the final rule pertaining
to the Motor Vehicle Emissions Budgets (MVEBs) for Washington County
(Parkersburg-Marietta, WV-OH), Jefferson County, (Steubenville-Weirton,
WV-OH), Belmont County (Wheeling, WV-OH), Stark County (Canton, OH) and
Allen County (Lima, OH). The Environmental Protection Agency (EPA)
proposed MVEBs for 2009 and 2018 for each of these Ohio counties. In
the final approvals for the redesignation of these areas to attainment
of the 8-hour ozone standard, EPA provide the 2018 MVEBs for each
county but inadvertently omitted the 2009 interim MVEBs that were
discussed in the proposed rules. This technical correction to these
final rules provides the 2009 MVEBs.

EFFECTIVE DATE: This final rule is effective on July 5, 2007.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Steve Marquardt, Environmental
Engineer, Criteria Pollutant Section, Air Programs Branch (AR-18J),
Environmental Protection Agency, Region 5, 77 West Jackson Boulevard,
Chicago, Illinois 60604,<PHONE_NUMBER><EMAIL_ADDRESS>
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: EPA published four notices of final
rulemaking to redesignate Washington County (Parkersburg-Marietta, WV-
OH), Jefferson County, (Steubenville-Weirton, WV-OH), Belmont County
(Wheeling, WV-OH), Stark County (Canton, OH) and Allen County (Lima,
OH) areas to attainment for the 8-hour ozone standard. For each of
these counties EPA had proposed approval of the 2009 and 2018 MVEBs. In
each of the final rulemaking notices, EPA omitted the 2009 MVEBs from
the final rules. This is a correction to add these 2009 MVEBs.

Correction

    For Allen County, and Stark County, Ohio, in the final rule
published in the Federal Register on May 16, 2007 (70 FR 27647), on
page 27649 in the first column, first paragraph: ``In addition, and
supported by and consistent with the ozone maintenance plan, EPA is
approving the 2018 VOC and NOX MVEBs for each county for
transportation conformity purposes. The 2018 motor vehicle * * *'' is
corrected to read: ``In addition, and supported by and consistent with
the ozone maintenance plan, EPA is approving the 2009 and 2018 VOC and
NOX MVEBs for each county for transportation conformity
purposes. The 2009 MVEB for Allen County, Ohio are 5.08 tons per day of
VOC and 8.28 tons per day of NOX. The 2018 MVEBs for Allen
County are 2.89 tons per day VOC and 3.47 tons per day of
NOX. For Stark County, Ohio, the 2009 MVEB area 10.02 tons
per day of VOC and 18.03 tons per day of NOX and the 2018
MVEBs are 5.37 tons per day of VOC and 7.08 tons per day of
NOX.
    For Belmont County, Ohio, in the final rule published in the
Federal Register on May 16, 2007 (70 FR 27644), on page 27645 in the
first column, first paragraph: ``In addition, and supported by and
consistent with the ozone maintenance plan, EPA is approving the 2018
VOC and NOX MVEBs for transportation conformity purposes.
The 2018 MVEBs * * *'' is corrected to read: ``In addition, and
supported by and consistent with the ozone maintenance plan, EPA is
approving the 2009 and 2018 VOC and NOX MVEBs for
transportation conformity purposes. For Belmont County, Ohio, the 2009
MVEBs are 2.60 tons per day of VOC and 2.22 tons per day of
NOX and the 2018 MVEBs are 1.52 tons per day of VOC and 1.91
tons per day of NOX. West Virginia develops MVEBs for its
portion of the area.''
    For Jefferson County, Ohio, in the final rule published in the
Federal Register on May 16, 2007 (70 FR 27640), on page 27641 in the
first column, first paragraph: ``In addition, and supported by and
consistent with the ozone maintenance plan, EPA is approving the 2018
volatile organic compound (VOC) and oxides of nitrogen (NOX)
MVEBs for Jefferson County for transportation conformity purposes. The
2018 MVEBs * * *'' is corrected to read: ``In addition, and supported
by and

consistent with the ozone maintenance plan, EPA is approving the 2009
and 2018 volatile organic compound (VOC) and oxides of nitrogen
(NOX) MVEBs for Jefferson County for transportation
conformity purposes. The 2009 MVEBs are 2.63 tons per day of VOC and
4.10 tons per day of NOX and the 2018 MVEBs are 1.37 tons
per day of VOC and 1.67 tons per day of NOX.''
    For Washington County, Ohio, in the final rule published in the
Federal Register on May 16, 2007 (70 FR 27652), on page 27653 in the
first column, first paragraph: ``In addition, and supported by and
consistent with the ozone maintenance plan, EPA is approving the 2018
volatile organic compound (VOC) and oxides of nitrogen (NOX)
MVEBs for Washington County for transportation conformity purposes. The
2018 MVEBs * * *'' is corrected to read: ``In addition, and supported
by and consistent with the ozone maintenance plan, EPA is approving the
2009 and 2018 volatile organic compound (VOC) and oxides of nitrogen
(NOX) MVEBs for Washington County for transportation
conformity purposes. The 2009 MVEBs are 2.59 tons per day of VOC and
3.58 tons per day of NOX and the 2018 MVEBs are 1.67 tons
per day of VOC and 1.76 tons per day of NOX. West Virginia
develops MVEBs for its portion of the area.''
    EPA is also making changes to 40 CFR 52.1885(ff) in order to
include the 2009 MVEBs for the Ohio Counties.
    Section 553 of the Administrative Procedure Act, 5 U.S.C.
553(b)(B), provides that, when an agency for good cause finds that
notice and public procedure are impracticable, unnecessary or contrary
to the public interest, the agency may issue a rule without providing
notice and an opportunity for public comment. We have determined that
there is good cause for making today's rule final without prior
proposal and opportunity for comment because we are merely correcting
an omission in a previous action. Thus, notice and public procedure are
unnecessary. We find that this constitutes good cause under 5 U.S.C.
553(b)(B).

Statutory and Executive Order Reviews

    Under Executive Order 12866 (58 FR 51735, October 4, 1993), this
action is not a ``significant regulatory action'' and is therefore not
subject to review by the Office of Management and Budget. For this
reason, this action is also not subject to Executive Order 13211,
``Actions Concerning Regulations That Significantly Affect Energy
Supply, Distribution, or Use'' (66 FR 28355 (May 22, 2001)). Because
the agency has made a ``good cause'' finding that this action is not
subject to notice-and-comment requirements under the Administrative
Procedures Act or any other statute as indicated in the Supplementary
Information section above, it is not subject to the regulatory
flexibility provisions of the Regulatory Flexibility Act (5 U.S.C 601
et seq.), or to sections 202 and 205 of the Unfunded Mandates Reform
Act of 1995 (UMRA) (Pub. L. 104-4). In addition, this action does not
significantly or uniquely affect small governments or impose a
significant intergovernmental mandate, as described in sections 203 and
204 of UMRA. This rule also does not have a substantial direct effect
on one or more Indian tribes, on the relationship between the Federal
Government and Indian tribes, or on the distribution of power and
responsibilities between the Federal Government and Indian tribes, as
specified by Executive Order 13175 (65 FR 67249, November 9, 2000), nor
will it have substantial direct effects on the States, on the
relationship between the National Government and the States, or on the
distribution of power and responsibilities among the various levels of
governments, as specified by Executive Order 13132 (64 FR 43255, August
10, 1999). This rule also is not subject to Executive Order 13045 (62
FR 19885, April 23, 1997), because it is not economically significant.
    This technical correction action does not involve technical
standards; thus the requirements of section 12(d) of the National
Technology Transfer and Advancement Act of 1995 (15 U.S.C. 272 note) do
not apply. The rule also does not involve special consideration of
environmental justice related issues as required by Executive Order
12898 (59 FR 7629, February 16, 1994). In issuing this rule, EPA has
taken the necessary steps to eliminate drafting errors and ambiguity,
minimize potential litigation, and provide a clear legal standard for
affected conduct, as required by section 3 of Executive Order 12988 (61
FR 4729, February 7, 1996). EPA has complied with Executive Order 12630
(53 FR 8859, March 15, 1998) by examining the takings implications of
the rule in accordance with the ``Attorney General's Supplemental
Guidelines for the Evaluation of Risk and Avoidance of Unanticipated
Takings'' issued under the executive order. This rule does not impose
an information collection burden under the Paperwork Reduction Act of
1995 (44 U.S.C. 3501 et seq.).
    The Congressional Review Act (5 U.S.C. 801 et seq.), as added by
the Small Business Regulatory Enforcement Fairness Act of 1996,
generally provides that before a rule may take effect, the agency
promulgating the rule must submit a rule report, which includes a copy
of the rule, to each House of the Congress and to the Comptroller
General of the United States. Section 808 allows the issuing agency to
make a rule effective sooner than otherwise provided by the CRA if the
agency makes a good cause finding that notice and public procedure is
impracticable, unnecessary or contrary to the public interest. This
determination must be supported by a brief statement. 5 U.S.C. 808(2).
As stated previously, EPA had made such a good cause finding, including
the reasons therefore, and established an effective date of July 5,
2007. EPA will submit a report containing this rule and other required
information to the U.S. Senate, the U.S. House of Representatives, and
the Comptroller General of the United States prior to publication of
the rule in the Federal Register. This correction to 40 CFR part 52 for
Ohio is not a ``major rule'' as defined by 5 U.S.C. 804(2).

    Dated: June 25, 2007.
Bharat Mathur,
Acting Regional Administrator, Region 5.

0
Parts 52, chapter I, title 40 of the Code of Federal Regulations is
amended as follows:

PART 52--[AMENDED]

0
1. The authority citation for part 52 continues to read as follows:

    Authority: 42 U.S.C. 7401 et seq.

Subpart KK--Ohio

0
2. Section 52.1885 is amended by revising paragraphs (ff) introductory
text and (ff)(1) through (4) to read as follows:

Sec.  52.1885  Control strategy: Ozone.

* * * * *
    (ff) Approval--The 8-hour ozone maintenance plans for the following
areas have been approved:
    (1) Jefferson County, as submitted on July 31, 2006 and
supplemented on October 3, 2006. The maintenance plan establishes 2009
motor vehicle emissions budgets (MVEBs) for Jefferson County of 2.63
tons per day (tpd) of volatile organic compounds (VOCs) and 4.10 tpd of
oxides of nitrogen (NOX), and 2018 motor vehicle emission
budgets of 1.37 tpd of VOCs and 1.67 tpd of NOX.
    (2) Belmont County, as submitted on June 20, 2006, and supplemented
on August 24, 2006, and December 4, 2006. The maintenance plan
establishes 2009 MVEBs for Belmont County of 2.60 tpd of VOCs and 2.22
tpd of NOX and 2018

MVEBs of 1.52 tpd of VOCs and 1.91 tpd of NOX.
    (3) Allen County and Stark County, as submitted on June 20, 2006,
and supplemented on August 24, 2006, and December 4, 2006. The
maintenance plan establishes 2009 MVEBs for Allen County of 5.08 tpd of
VOCs and 8.28 tpd of NOX, and 2018 MVEBs for Allen County of
2.89 tpd of VOCs and 3.47 tpd of NOX. For Stark County the
2009 MVEBs are 10.02 tpd of VOCs and 18.03 tpd of NOX, and
the 2018 budgets are 5.37 tpd of VOC and 7.08 tpd of NOX.
    (4) Washington County, as submitted on September 22, 2006, and
supplemented on November 17, 2006. The maintenance plan establishes
2009 MVEBs for Washington County of 2.59 tpd of VOCs and 3.58 tpd of
NOX, and 2018 MVEBs for Washington county of 1.67 tpd of
VOCs and 1.76 tpd of NOX.

[FR Doc. E7-13000 Filed 7-3-07; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 6560-50-P


[Federal Register Volume 79, Number 21 (Friday, January 31, 2014)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Pages 5247-5249]
[FR Doc No: 2014-01461]

=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION

Federal Aviation Administration

14 CFR Part 39

[Docket No. FAA-2013-0501; Directorate Identifier 2011-SW-036-AD;
Amendment 39-17732; AD 2014-02-04]
RIN 2120-AA64

Airworthiness Directives; Eurocopter France Helicopters

AGENCY: Federal Aviation Administration (FAA), DOT.

ACTION: Final rule.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: We are adopting a new airworthiness directive (AD) for
Eurocopter France (Eurocopter) Model EC 155B and EC155B1 helicopters.
This AD requires repetitively inspecting the lower and upper front and
rear fittings (fittings) that attach the upper fin to the fenestron for
a crack and, if there is a crack, removing all four fittings from
service. This AD also requires, within a specified time, removing all
fittings from service, and the fittings would not be eligible to be
installed on any

helicopter. This AD was prompted by the loss of an upper fin in flight.
The actions of this AD are intended to detect a crack in the fittings
to prevent loss of the upper fin and subsequent loss of control of the
helicopter.

DATES: This AD is effective March 7, 2014.
    The Director of the Federal Register approved the incorporation by
reference of a certain document listed in this AD as of March 7, 2014.

ADDRESSES: For service information identified in this AD, contact
American Eurocopter Corporation, 2701 N. Forum Drive, Grand Prairie, TX
75052; telephone<PHONE_NUMBER> or<PHONE_NUMBER>; fax<PHONE_NUMBER>;
or at http://www.eurocopter.com/techpub. You may review the referenced
service information at the FAA, Office of the Regional Counsel,
Southwest Region, 2601 Meacham Blvd., Room 663, Fort Worth, Texas
76137.

Examining the AD Docket

    You may examine the AD docket on the Internet at http://www.regulations.gov or in person at the Docket Operations Office
between 9 a.m. and 5 p.m., Monday through Friday, except Federal
holidays. The AD docket contains this AD, the European Aviation Safety
Agency (EASA) AD, any incorporated-by-reference service information,
the economic evaluation, any comments received, and other information.
The street address for the Docket Operations Office (phone: 800-647-
5527) is U.S. Department of Transportation, Docket Operations Office,
M-30, West Building Ground Floor, Room W12-140, 1200 New Jersey Avenue
SE., Washington, DC 20590.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Robert Grant, Aviation Safety
Engineer, Safety Management Group, FAA, 2601 Meacham Blvd., Fort Worth,
Texas 76137; telephone<PHONE_NUMBER>; email<EMAIL_ADDRESS>
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

Discussion

    On June 11, 2013, at 78 FR 34960, the Federal Register published
our notice of proposed rulemaking (NPRM), which proposed to amend 14
CFR part 39 to include an AD that would apply to Model EC 155B and
EC155B1 helicopters. The NPRM proposed inspecting certain part-numbered
fittings for a crack and, if there is a crack, removing the fittings
from service before further flight. Also, the NPRM proposed removing
certain part-numbered fittings from service within 180 hours time-in-
service (TIS) and prohibiting the fittings from being eligible for
installation on any helicopter. The proposed requirements were intended
to detect a crack in the fittings to prevent loss of the upper fin and
subsequent loss of control of the helicopter.
    The NPRM was prompted by AD No. 2011-0108, dated June 7, 2011,
issued by EASA, which is the Technical Agent for the Member States of
the European Union, to correct an unsafe condition for Eurocopter Model
EC 155B and EC155B1 helicopters. EASA advises of an in-flight loss of a
fin on a Model EC155B1 helicopter. According to EASA, a crack in the
fittings attaching the upper fin to the fenestron (tail rotor assembly)
was discovered during an investigation. As a result, EASA issued an
emergency AD to mandate repetitive inspections of the upper fin
attachment fittings. EASA states that Eurocopter developed modification
(MOD) 0754B40 to increase the strength of the fuselage-fin junction
fittings by installing two reinforced single-piece fittings to replace
the affected fittings, which is terminating action for the repetitive
inspection requirements. EASA subsequently issued AD No. 2011-0108,
which superseded its emergency AD, to require installation of MOD
0754B40 and to retain the repetitive inspection requirements until the
MOD is installed.

Comments

    We gave the public the opportunity to participate in developing
this AD, but we did not receive any comments on the NPRM (78 FR 34960,
June 11, 2013).

FAA's Determination

    These helicopters have been approved by the aviation authority of
France and are approved for operation in the United States. Pursuant to
our bilateral agreement with France, EASA, its technical
representative, has notified us of the unsafe condition described in
the EASA AD. We are issuing this AD because we evaluated all
information provided by EASA and determined the unsafe condition exists
and is likely to exist or develop on other helicopters of these same
type designs and that air safety and the public interest require
adopting the AD requirements as proposed.

Differences Between this AD and the EASA AD

    This AD does not require replacing the upper fin to fenestron
fittings with reinforced fittings in accordance with MOD 0754B40 within
6 calendar months as stated in the EASA AD, but rather requires
removing the affected fittings from service within the equivalent 180
hours TIS.

Related Service Information

    Eurocopter has issued Emergency Alert Service Bulletin No. 05A017,
Revision 2, dated December 9, 2010, which specifies repetitively
inspecting the fittings for a crack and replacing each fitting if there
is a crack. Eurocopter has also issued Service Bulletin No. 53-029,
Revision 1, dated March 10, 2011, which specifies replacing the
fittings with reinforced fittings in accordance with MOD 0754B40.

Costs of Compliance

    We estimate that this AD will affect 9 helicopters of U.S.
Registry. We estimate that operators will incur the following costs in
order to comply with this AD based on an average labor rate of $85 per
work hour. It will take 1 work hour to inspect the fittings and about 3
inspections before replacement. It will take 8 work hours to replace
the fittings, and required parts will cost $3,311. Based on these
figures, the total cost will be $4,246 per helicopter and $38,214 for
the U.S. fleet.

Authority for this Rulemaking

    Title 49 of the United States Code specifies the FAA's authority to
issue rules on aviation safety. Subtitle I, section 106, describes the
authority of the FAA Administrator. Subtitle VII: Aviation Programs,
describes in more detail the scope of the Agency's authority.
    We are issuing this rulemaking under the authority described in
Subtitle VII, Part A, Subpart III, Section 44701: ``General
requirements.'' Under that section, Congress charges the FAA with
promoting safe flight of civil aircraft in air commerce by prescribing
regulations for practices, methods, and procedures the Administrator
finds necessary for safety in air commerce. This regulation is within
the scope of that authority because it addresses an unsafe condition
that is likely to exist or develop on helicopters identified in this
rulemaking action.

Regulatory Findings

    This AD will not have federalism implications under Executive Order
13132. This AD will not have a substantial direct effect on the States,
on the relationship between the national government and the States, or
on the distribution of power and responsibilities among the various
levels of government.
    For the reasons discussed above, I certify that this AD:
    (1) Is not a ``significant regulatory action'' under Executive
Order 12866;

    (2) Is not a ``significant rule'' under DOT Regulatory Policies and
Procedures (44 FR 11034, February 26, 1979);
    (3) Will not affect intrastate aviation in Alaska to the extent
that it justifies making a regulatory distinction; and
    (4) Will not have a significant economic impact, positive or
negative, on a substantial number of small entities under the criteria
of the Regulatory Flexibility Act.
    We prepared an economic evaluation of the estimated costs to comply
with this AD and placed it in the AD docket.

List of Subjects in 14 CFR Part 39

    Air transportation, Aircraft, Aviation safety, Incorporation by
reference, Safety.

Adoption of the Amendment

    Accordingly, under the authority delegated to me by the
Administrator, the FAA amends 14 CFR part 39 as follows:

PART 39--AIRWORTHINESS DIRECTIVES

0
1. The authority citation for part 39 continues to read as follows:

    Authority: 49 U.S.C. 106(g), 40113, 44701.

Sec.  39.13  [Amended]

0
2. The FAA amends Sec.  39.13 by adding the following new airworthiness
directive (AD):

    2014-02-04 Eurocopter France Helicopters: Amendment 39-17732;
Docket No. FAA-2013-0501; Directorate Identifier 2011-SW-036-AD.

(a) Applicability

    This AD applies to Model EC 155B and EC155B1 helicopters with
lower front fitting part number (P/N) 365A23-4240-01, upper front
fitting P/N 365A23-4242-01, lower rear fitting P/N 365A23-4241-01,
or upper rear fitting P/N 365A23-4243-01 (fittings), installed,
certificated in any category.

 (b) Unsafe Condition

    This AD defines the unsafe condition as a crack in a fitting.
This condition could result in loss of the upper fin during flight
and subsequent loss of control of the helicopter.

(c) Effective Date

    This AD becomes effective March 7, 2014.

(d) Compliance

    You are responsible for performing each action required by this
AD within the specified compliance time unless it has already been
accomplished prior to that time.

(e) Required Actions

    (1) Within 15 hours time-in-service (TIS) and thereafter at
intervals not to exceed 55 hours TIS:
    (i) Using an appropriate light source and a 10x or higher power
magnifying glass, inspect each front (item c) and rear (item d)
upper fitting and each front (item e) and rear (item f) lower
fitting for a crack as depicted in Detail A of Figure 1 of
Eurocopter Emergency Alert Service Bulletin No. 05A017, Revision 2,
dated December 9, 2010 (ASB). Inspect the hatched area as depicted
in Details B, C, and D of Figure 2 of the ASB. A high-resolution
(more than 2 million pixels) digital camera or dye-penetrant
inspection may be used to facilitate the crack inspection.
    (ii) If there is a crack in any fitting, before further flight,
remove all four fittings from service.
    (2) Within 180 hours TIS, remove the fittings from service.
    (3) Do not install lower front fitting P/N 365A23-4240-01, upper
front fitting P/N 365A23-4242-01, lower rear fitting P/N 365A23-
4241-01, and upper rear fitting P/N 365A23-4243-01 on any
helicopter.

(f) Credit for Actions Previously Completed

    Inspections accomplished before the effective date of this AD in
accordance with the procedures specified in Eurocopter Emergency
Alert Service Bulletin No. 05A017, Revision 2, dated December 9,
2010; Revision 1, dated January 27, 2010; and Revision 0, dated
September 28, 2007, are considered acceptable for compliance with
the initial inspection specified in paragraph (e)(1) of this AD.

(g) Special flight permits

    Special flight permits will not be issued.

(h) Alternative Methods of Compliance (AMOCs)

    (1) The Manager, Safety Management Group, FAA, may approve AMOCs
for this AD. Send your proposal to: Robert Grant, Aviation Safety
Engineer, Safety Management Group, FAA, 2601 Meacham Blvd., Fort
Worth, Texas 76137; telephone<PHONE_NUMBER>; email
<EMAIL_ADDRESS>    (2) For operations conducted under a 14 CFR part 119 operating
certificate or under 14 CFR part 91, subpart K, we suggest that you
notify your principal inspector, or lacking a principal inspector,
the manager of the local flight standards district office or
certificate holding district office, before operating any aircraft
complying with this AD through an AMOC.

(i) Additional Information

    (1) Eurocopter Service Bulletin No. 53-029, Revision 1, dated
March 10, 2011, which is not incorporated by reference, contains
additional information about the subject of this AD. For service
information identified in this AD, contact American Eurocopter
Corporation, 2701 N. Forum Drive, Grand Prairie, TX 75052; telephone
(972) 641-0000 or<PHONE_NUMBER>; fax<PHONE_NUMBER>; or at http://www.eurocopter.com/techpub. You may review the referenced service
information at the FAA, Office of the Regional Counsel, Southwest
Region, 2601 Meacham Blvd., Room 663, Fort Worth, Texas 76137.
    (2) The subject of this AD is addressed in European Aviation
Safety Agency AD No. 2011-0108, dated June 7, 2011, which can be
found in Docket No. FAA-2013-0501 on the Internet at http://www.regulations.gov.

(j) Subject

    Joint Aircraft Service Component (JASC) Code: 5530 Vertical
Stabilizer Structure.

(k) Material Incorporated by Reference

    (1) The Director of the Federal Register approved the
incorporation by reference (IBR) of the service information listed
in this paragraph under 5 U.S.C. 552(a) and 1 CFR part 51.
    (2) You must use this service information as applicable to do
the actions required by this AD, unless the AD specifies otherwise.
    (i) Eurocopter Emergency Alert Service Bulletin No. 05A017,
Revision 2, dated December 9, 2010.
    (ii) Reserved.
    (3) For Eurocopter service information identified in this AD,
contact American Eurocopter Corporation, 2701 N. Forum Drive, Grand
Prairie, TX 75052; telephone<PHONE_NUMBER> or<PHONE_NUMBER>; fax
(972) 641-3775; or at http://www.eurocopter.com/techpub.
    (4) You may view this service information at FAA, Office of the
Regional Counsel, Southwest Region, 2601 Meacham Blvd., Room 663,
Fort Worth, Texas 76137. For information on the availability of this
material at the FAA, call<PHONE_NUMBER>.
    (5) You may view this service information that is incorporated
by reference at the National Archives and Records Administration
(NARA). For information on the availability of this material at
NARA, call<PHONE_NUMBER>, or go to: http://www.archives.gov/federal-register/cfr/ibr-locations.html.

    Issued in Fort Worth, Texas, on January 16, 2014.
Lance T. Gant,
Acting Directorate Manager, Rotorcraft Directorate, Aircraft
Certification Service.
[FR Doc. 2014-01461 Filed 1-30-14; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910-13-P


Comment Info: =================

General Comment:Dear Mr. Zeller:

I am writing as an individual consumer to request an extension of the comment period for the Food and Drug Administration's ("FDA") Proposed Rule Deeming Tobacco Products to be Subject to the Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act, as amended by the Family Smoking and Prevention and Tobacco Control Act (the "Proposed Rule") published at 79 Fed. Reg. 23,142 and Federal Register No. 2014-09491. On behalf of myself, and the vaping comunity, I am requesting that the comment period for the Proposed Rule be extended by the FDA for an additional 105 days, from its current 75-day period, to 180 days.The Proposed Rule raises a number of significant issues and questions that are very important and relevant to me, as a consumer of products that are proposed for regulation under the Proposed Rule. The Proposed Rule asks about a hundred different questions I might want to respond to. I want to provide my thoughts, opinions, and comments on many of these issues, but my time to devote to researching and providing thoughtful and intelligent comments on these important questions is limited.
I have already spent many hours researching and breaking down these issues, but they take time. I know that the FDA took many years to even come up with the Proposed Rule, so I do not think it is at all unreasonable to allow the public a mere six months to comment on it, for the sake of a mutually beneficial resolution to the matter at hand. This is our only opportunity, as consumers and comunity members, to provide our feedback and suggestions to the proposed regulation the Food and Drug Administration is offering.
I feel very strongly about e-cigarettes as an alternative to combustible cigarettes, and an oportunity to creat hundreds of jobs in the United States, as many manufacturers and vendors have already done so. Quite simply, I firmly believe that they saved not only my life but many accross our country and provided many needed jobs as well. I wish to provide you with my personal story, as well as science- and evidence-based responses to your questions so that you can take the communities comments, opinions and concerns, as well as mine, into account. I realize that the FDA has the authority under 21 CFR 10.40 to extend this time frame and that the FDA has exercised this authority on numerous occasions in the past, Hoping you will see the need to do so once more, I would therefore ask that you do so here, so that all stakeholders have the opportunity to provide their comments, and concerns on this proposed regulation.

Thank you for having taken the time to
read and take this letter into account,
have a wonderful day.
Sincerely and appreciatively, Hector
From Las Vegas NV.