Air Pollution Episode
Alert Criteria effective December 2018

When weather conditions and/or concentrations of an air contaminant or contaminants are such that immediate action is necessary to prevent further increases in air contamination or damage to life, property or environmental quality, the DEC Commissioner shall designate by order that a "Forecast," "Alert I," "Alert II" or "Emergency" stage of an air pollution episode exists. The Commissioner may also designate by order that an episode exists when a single accident, occurrence or condition has resulted or is likely to result in damage to life, property or environmental quality.  DEC uses the federal Air Quality Index and associated Significant Harm Levels for criteria pollutants as alert criteria for air pollution episodes.
                              Alert Criteria [1]
                                   Pollutant
                                Averaging
Time
                               National Standard
                                "Forecast"
                       Air Quality
Advisory
(AQI>=101)
                          "Alert I" AQI
(201-300)
                         "Alert II" AQI
(301-400)
                         "Emergency" AQI
(401-500)
PM2.5
24 hr
35 (ug/m[3])
>=35.5
150.5-250.4
250.5-350.4
>350.4
PM10
24 hr
150 (ug/m[3])
>=155
355-424
425-504
>504
Ozone
1 hr
0.12 (ppm)
>=0.125
0.205-0.404
0.405-0.504
>0.504
Ozone
8 hr
0.070 (ppm)
>=0.071
0.106-0.200
---
---
CO
1 hr
35 (ppm)
>=35.5
15.5-30.4
30.5-40.4
>40.4
SO2
1 hr
75 (ppb)
>=76
305-604
605-804
>804
NO2
1 hr
100 (ppb)
>=101
650-1249
1250-1649
>1649
1 AQI Levels from 40 CFR Part 58 Appendix G, Table 2 (as of December 3, 2018)

6 NYCRR Part 207, "Control Measures for an Air Pollution Episode," requires owners of a significant air contamination source to submit a proposed episode action plan to DEC within 90 days of a request by DEC. Episode action plans must contain detailed steps which will be taken to reduce air contaminant emissions during each stage of an air pollution episode.

Contact Information
DEC's Division of Air Resources (DAR) can provide essential information and data-gathering services during an air pollution episode. DAR will provide for an orderly means of coordinating and communicating DEC air pollution control efforts and instructions during air pollution episodes. For assistance in the event of an air pollution episode, please contact DAR or the State Emergency Management Organization at one of the following numbers.
                                     Title
                                   Counties
                                     Phone
NYSDEC
Division of Air Resources
Statewide
(518) 402-8452
DEC Region 1
Nassau and Suffolk counties
(631) 444-0200
DEC Region 2
Bronx, Kings, New York, Queens,
and Richmond counties
(718) 482-4900
DEC Region 3
Dutchess, Orange, Putnam, Rockland,
Sullivan, Ulster, and Westchester counties
(845) 256-3000
DEC Region 4
Albany, Columbia, Delaware, Greene,
Montgomery, Otsego, Rensselaer,
Schenectady, and Schoharie counties
(518) 357-2068
DEC Region 5
Clinton, Essex, Franklin, Fulton, Hamilton,
Saratoga, Warren, and Washington counties
(518) 623-1200
DEC Region 6
Herkimer, Jefferson, Lewis, Oneida,
and St. Lawrence counties
(315) 785-2239
DEC Region 7
Broome, Cayuga, Chenango, Cortland,
Madison, Onondaga, Oswego, Tioga
and Tompkins counties
(315) 426-7400
DEC Region 8
Chemung, Genesee, Livingston, Monroe,
Ontario, Orleans, Schuyler, Seneca,
Steuben, Wayne, and Yates counties
(585) 226-9485
DEC Region 9
Allegany, Cattaraugus, Chautauqua,
Erie, Niagara, and Wyoming counties
(716) 851-7201
State Emergency
Management Organization
Statewide
(518) 292-2200


[Federal Register Volume 79, Number 41 (Monday, March 3, 2014)]
[Notices]
[Pages 11776-11777]
[FR Doc No: 2014-04517]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission

Combined Notice of Filings

    Take notice that the Commission has received the following Natural
Gas Pipeline Rate and Refund Report filings:

Filings Instituting Proceedings

    Docket Numbers: RP14-492-000.
    Applicants: Iroquois Gas Transmission System, L.P.
    Description: 02/20/14 Negotiated Rates--Sequent Energy Management
(HUB) 3075-89 to be effective 2/19/2014.
    Filed Date: 2/20/14.
    Accession Number: 20140220-5084.
    Comments Due: 5 p.m. ET 3/4/14.

    Docket Numbers: RP14-493-000.
    Applicants: Florida Gas Transmission Company, LLC.
    Description: Curtailment Priority Filing on 2-20-14 to be effective
3/23/2014.
    Filed Date: 2/20/14.
    Accession Number: 20140220-5086.
    Comments Due: 5 p.m. ET 3/4/14.

    Docket Numbers: RP14-494-000.
    Applicants: Questar Pipeline Company.
    Description: Remove expired contracts from Statements of Rates to
be effective 3/22/2014.

    Filed Date: 2/20/14.
    Accession Number: 20140220-5090.
    Comments Due: 5 p.m. ET 3/4/14.

    Docket Numbers: RP14-495-000.
    Applicants: Natural Gas Pipeline Company of America.
    Description: BG Energy's Negotiated Rate to be effective 4/1/2014.
    Filed Date: 2/20/14.
    Accession Number: 20140220-5097.
    Comments Due: 5 p.m. ET 3/4/14.

    Docket Numbers: RP14-496-000.
    Applicants: Southern LNG Company, L.L.C.
    Description: SLNG Fuel and Electricity Recovery Revisions to be
effective 4/1/2014.
    Filed Date: 2/20/14.
    Accession Number: 20140220-5099.
    Comments Due: 5 p.m. ET 3/4/14.

    Docket Numbers: RP14-497-000.
    Applicants: Iroquois Gas Transmission System, L.P.
    Description: 02/20/14 Negotiated Rates--Tenaska Gas Storage, LLC
(HUB) 1175-89 to be effective 2/21/2014.
    Filed Date: 2/20/14.
    Accession Number: 20140220-5144.
    Comments Due: 5 p.m. ET 3/4/14.

    Docket Numbers: RP14-498-000.
    Applicants: Northern Natural Gas Company.
    Description: 20140220 Negotiated Rate to be effective 2/21/2014.
    Filed Date: 2/20/14.
    Accession Number: 20140220-5198.
    Comments Due: 5 p.m. ET 3/4/14.

    Docket Numbers: RP14-499-000.
    Applicants: Northwest Pipeline LLC.
    Description: Conditional Extensions Filing to be effective 4/1/
2014.
    Filed Date: 2/20/14.
    Accession Number: 20140220-5217.
    Comments Due: 5 p.m. ET 3/4/14.

    Docket Numbers: RP14-500-000.
    Applicants: Transwestern Pipeline Company, LLC.
    Description: Settlement Fuel Filing on 2-21-2014 to be effective 4/
1/2014.
    Filed Date: 2/21/14.
    Accession Number: 20140221-5022.
    Comments Due: 5 p.m. ET 3/5/14.

    Docket Numbers: RP14-501-000.
    Applicants: Southern Natural Gas Company, L.L.C.
    Description: Fuel Retention Rates--2014 to be effective 4/1/2014.
    Filed Date: 2/21/14.
    Accession Number: 20140221-5025.
    Comments Due: 5 p.m. ET 3/5/14.

    Docket Numbers: RP14-502-000.
    Applicants: Gulf South Pipeline Company, LP.
    Description: PAL Neg Rate Agmts Filing (42027, 42028, 42029, 42031,
42033, 42034, 42035) to be effective 2/20/2014.
    Filed Date: 2/21/14.
    Accession Number: 20140221-5033.
    Comments Due: 5 p.m. ET 3/5/14.

    Docket Numbers: RP14-503-000.
    Applicants: Guardian Pipeline, L.L.C.
    Description: Negotiated Rate PAL Agreement--Chevron U.S.A. to be
effective 2/22/2014.
    Filed Date: 2/21/14.
    Accession Number: 20140221-5170.
    Comments Due: 5 p.m. ET 3/5/14.
    Any person desiring to intervene or protest in any of the above
proceedings must file in accordance with Rules 211 and 214 of the
Commission's Regulations (18 CFR 385.211 and 385.214) on or before 5:00
p.m. Eastern time on the specified comment date. Protests may be
considered, but intervention is necessary to become a party to the
proceeding.

Filings in Existing Proceedings

    Docket Numbers: RP14-370-001.
    Applicants: Bear Creek Storage Company, L.L.C.
    Description: Operational Transactions--Compliance to be effective
2/14/2014.
    Filed Date: 2/20/14.
    Accession Number: 20140220-5082.
    Comments Due: 5 p.m. ET 3/4/14.
    Any person desiring to protest in any of the above proceedings must
file in accordance with Rule 211 of the Commission's Regulations (18
CFR 385.211) on or before 5:00 p.m. Eastern time on the specified
comment date.
    The filings are accessible in the Commission's eLibrary system by
clicking on the links or querying the docket number.
    eFiling is encouraged. More detailed information relating to filing
requirements, interventions, protests, service, and qualifying
facilities filings can be found at: http://www.ferc.gov/docs-filing/efiling/filing-req.pdf. For other information, call<PHONE_NUMBER>
(toll free). For TTY, call<PHONE_NUMBER>.

    Dated February 24, 2014.
Nathaniel J. Davis, Sr.,
Deputy Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2014-04517 Filed 2-28-14; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6717-01-P


[Federal Register Volume 87, Number 130 (Friday, July 8, 2022)]
[Proposed Rules]
[Pages 40752-40755]
[FR Doc No: 2022-14443]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION

Federal Aviation Administration

14 CFR Part 39

[Docket No. FAA-2022-0812; Project Identifier MCAI-2022-00445-T]
RIN 2120-AA64

Airworthiness Directives; Airbus SAS Airplanes

AGENCY: Federal Aviation Administration (FAA), DOT.

ACTION: Notice of proposed rulemaking (NPRM).

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The FAA proposes to adopt a new airworthiness directive (AD)
for all Airbus SAS Model A300 B4-600, B4-600R, and F4-600R series
airplanes, and Model A300 C4-605R Variant F airplanes (collectively
called Model A300-600 series airplanes), and A310 series airplanes.
This proposed AD was prompted by a determination that a new
airworthiness limitation is necessary. This proposed AD would require
revising the existing maintenance or inspection program, as applicable,
to incorporate a new airworthiness limitation, as specified in a
European Union Aviation Safety Agency (EASA) AD, which is proposed for
incorporation by reference. The FAA is proposing this AD to address the
unsafe condition on these products.

DATES: The FAA must receive comments on this proposed AD by August 22,
2022.

ADDRESSES: You may send comments, using the procedures found in 14 CFR
11.43 and 11.45, by any of the following methods:
     Federal eRulemaking Portal: Go to https://www.regulations.gov. Follow the instructions for submitting comments.
     Fax:<PHONE_NUMBER>.
     Mail: U.S. Department of Transportation, Docket
Operations, M-30, West Building Ground Floor, Room W12-140, 1200 New
Jersey Avenue SE, Washington, DC 20590.
     Hand Delivery: Deliver to Mail address above between 9
a.m. and 5 p.m., Monday through Friday, except Federal holidays.
    For material that will be incorporated by reference (IBR) in this
AD, contact EASA, Konrad-Adenauer-Ufer 3, 50668 Cologne, Germany;
telephone +49 221 8999 000; email [email protected]; internet
www.easa.europa.eu. You may find this material on the EASA website at
https://ad.easa.europa.eu. You may view this material at the FAA,
Airworthiness Products Section, Operational Safety Branch, 2200 South
216th St., Des Moines, WA. For information on the availability of this
material at the FAA, call<PHONE_NUMBER>. It is also available in the AD
docket at https://www.regulations.gov by searching for and locating
Docket No. FAA-2022-0812.

Examining the AD Docket

    You may examine the AD docket at https://www.regulations.gov by
searching for and locating Docket No. FAA-2022-0812; or in person at
Docket Operations between 9 a.m. and 5 p.m., Monday through Friday,
except Federal holidays. The AD docket contains this NPRM, the
mandatory continuing airworthiness information (MCAI), any comments
received, and other information. The street address for Docket
Operations is listed above.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Dan Rodina, Aerospace Engineer, Large
Aircraft Section, International Validation Branch, FAA, 2200 South
216th Street, Des Moines, WA 98198; telephone<PHONE_NUMBER>; email
[email protected].

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

Comments Invited

    The FAA invites you to send any written relevant data, views, or
arguments about this proposal. Send your comments to an address listed
under ADDRESSES. Include ``Docket No. FAA-2022-0812; Project Identifier

MCAI-2022-00445-T'' at the beginning of your comments. The most helpful
comments reference a specific portion of the proposal, explain the
reason for any recommended change, and include supporting data. The FAA
will consider all comments received by the closing date and may amend
this proposal because of those comments.
    Except for Confidential Business Information (CBI) as described in
the following paragraph, and other information as described in 14 CFR
11.35, the FAA will post all comments received, without change, to
https://www.regulations.gov, including any personal information you
provide. The agency will also post a report summarizing each
substantive verbal contact received about this NPRM.

Confidential Business Information

    CBI is commercial or financial information that is both customarily
and actually treated as private by its owner. Under the Freedom of
Information Act (FOIA) (5 U.S.C. 552), CBI is exempt from public
disclosure. If your comments responsive to this NPRM contain commercial
or financial information that is customarily treated as private, that
you actually treat as private, and that is relevant or responsive to
this NPRM, it is important that you clearly designate the submitted
comments as CBI. Please mark each page of your submission containing
CBI as ``PROPIN.'' The FAA will treat such marked submissions as
confidential under the FOIA, and they will not be placed in the public
docket of this NPRM. Submissions containing CBI should be sent to Dan
Rodina, Aerospace Engineer, Large Aircraft Section, International
Validation Branch, FAA, 2200 South 216th Street, Des Moines, WA 98198;
telephone<PHONE_NUMBER>; email [email protected]. Any commentary that
the FAA receives which is not specifically designated as CBI will be
placed in the public docket for this rulemaking.

Background

    EASA, which is the Technical Agent for the Member States of the
European Union, has issued EASA AD 2022-0060, dated April 1, 2022 (EASA
AD 2022-0060) (also referred to as the MCAI), to correct an unsafe
condition for all Airbus SAS Model A300-600 and A310 series airplanes,
and A300-600ST airplanes. Model A300-600ST airplanes are not
certificated by the FAA and are not included on the U.S. type
certificate data sheet; this proposed AD therefore does not include
those airplanes in the applicability.
    EASA previously issued AD 2017-0203, dated October 12, 2017 (EASA
AD 2017-0203) and AD 2019-0188, dated July 31, 2019 (EASA AD 2019-0188)
to require accomplishment of all airworthiness limitations as described
in Airbus A300-600 Airworthiness Limitations Section (ALS) Part 3,
Certification Maintenance Requirements (CMR), Revision 01, dated August
28, 2017, and A310 ALS Part 3, CMR, Revision 01, dated August 28, 2017;
and A300-600 ALS Part 3, CMR, Variation 1.1, dated February 21, 2019,
and A310 ALS Part 3, CMR, Variation 1.1, dated February 21, 2019
(introducing a functional test of the reservoir air pressurization
lines for pipe rupture); respectively. EASA AD 2017-0203 corresponds to
FAA AD 2018-18-20, Amendment 39-19399 (83 FR 47042, September 18, 2018)
(AD 2018-18-20). EASA AD 2019-0188 corresponds to FAA AD 2020-02-22,
Amendment 39-19834 (85 FR 8148, February 13, 2020) (AD 2020-02-22).
    This proposed AD was prompted by a determination that a new
airworthiness limitation is necessary. The FAA is proposing this AD to
address safety-significant latent failures that would, in combination
with one or more other specific failures or events, result in a
hazardous or catastrophic failure condition of hydraulic systems. See
the MCAI for additional background information.

Relationship to AD 2018-18-20 and AD 2020-02-22

    This NPRM would not supersede AD 2018-18-20 and AD 2020-02-22.
Rather, we have determined that a stand-alone AD would be more
appropriate to address the changes in the MCAI. This NPRM would require
revising the maintenance or inspection program, as applicable, to
incorporate a new airworthiness limitation.

Related Service Information Under 1 CFR Part 51

    EASA AD 2022-0060 describes a new airworthiness limitation for
airplane hydraulic systems: Certification Maintenance Requirement (CMR)
task<PHONE_NUMBER>4-1-C ``Main and Auxiliary (Hydraulic Power)--
Functional Check of the 3 Hydraulic Reservoirs for Air Leakage.''
    This material is reasonably available because the interested
parties have access to it through their normal course of business or by
the means identified in the ADDRESSES section.

FAA's Determination

    These products have been approved by the aviation authority of
another country and are approved for operation in the United States.
Pursuant to the FAA's bilateral agreement with the State of Design
Authority, it has notified the FAA of the unsafe condition described in
the MCAI and service information referenced above. The FAA is issuing
this NPRM after determining that the unsafe condition described
previously is likely to exist or develop in other products of these
same type designs.

Proposed AD Requirements in This NPRM

    This proposed AD would require revising the existing maintenance or
inspection program, as applicable, to incorporate a new airworthiness
limitation, which is specified in EASA AD 2022-0060 described
previously, except for any differences identified as exceptions in the
regulatory text of this proposed AD.
    This proposed AD would require revisions to certain operator
maintenance documents to include new actions (e.g., inspections).
Compliance with these is required by 14 CFR 91.403(c). For airplanes
that have been previously modified, altered, or repaired in the areas
addressed by this proposed AD, the operator may not be able to
accomplish the actions described in the revisions. In this situation,
to comply with 14 CFR 91.403(c), the operator must request approval for
an alternative method of compliance according to paragraph (j)(1) of
this proposed AD.

Explanation of Required Compliance Information

    In the FAA's ongoing efforts to improve the efficiency of the AD
process, the FAA developed a process to use some civil aviation
authority (CAA) ADs as the primary source of information for compliance
with requirements for corresponding FAA ADs. The FAA has been
coordinating this process with manufacturers and CAAs. As a result, the
FAA proposes to incorporate EASA AD 2022-0060 by reference in the FAA
final rule. This proposed AD would, therefore, require compliance with
EASA AD 2022-0060 in its entirety through that incorporation, except
for any differences identified as exceptions in the regulatory text of
this proposed AD. Using common terms that are the same as the heading
of a particular section in EASA AD 2022-0060 does not mean that
operators need comply only with that section. For example, where the AD
requirement refers to ``all required actions and compliance times,''
compliance with this AD requirement is not limited to the section
titled ``Required Action(s) and Compliance

Time(s)'' in EASA AD 2022-0060. Service information required by EASA AD
2022-0060 for compliance will be available at https://www.regulations.gov by searching for and locating Docket No. FAA-2022-
0812 after the FAA final rule is published.

Airworthiness Limitation ADs Using the New Process

    The FAA's process of incorporating by reference MCAI ADs as the
primary source of information for compliance with corresponding FAA ADs
has been limited to certain MCAI ADs (primarily those with service
bulletins as the primary source of information for accomplishing the
actions required by the FAA AD). However, the FAA is now expanding the
process to include MCAI ADs that require a change to airworthiness
limitation documents, such as airworthiness limitation sections.
    For these ADs that incorporate by reference an MCAI AD that changes
airworthiness limitations, the FAA requirements are unchanged.
Operators must revise the existing maintenance or inspection program,
as applicable, to incorporate the information specified in the new
airworthiness limitation document. The airworthiness limitations must
be followed according to 14 CFR 91.403(c) and 91.409(e).
    The previous format of the airworthiness limitation ADs included a
paragraph that specified that no alternative actions (e.g., inspections
or intervals) may be used unless the actions and intervals are approved
as an alternative method of compliance (AMOC) in accordance with the
procedures specified in the AMOCs paragraph under ``Additional FAA
Provisions.'' This new format includes a ``New Provisions for
Alternative Actions and Intervals'' paragraph that does not
specifically refer to AMOCs, but operators may still request an AMOC to
use an alternative action or interval.

Costs of Compliance

    The FAA estimates that this proposed AD would affect 120 airplanes
of U.S. registry. The FAA estimates the following costs to comply with
this proposed AD:
    The FAA has determined that revising the existing maintenance or
inspection program takes an average of 90 work-hours per operator,
although the agency recognizes that this number may vary from operator
to operator. Since operators incorporate maintenance or inspection
program changes for their affected fleet(s), the FAA has determined
that a per-operator estimate is more accurate than a per-airplane
estimate. Therefore, the agency estimates the average total cost per
operator to be $7,650 (90 work-hours x $85 per work-hour).

Authority for This Rulemaking

    Title 49 of the United States Code specifies the FAA's authority to
issue rules on aviation safety. Subtitle I, section 106, describes the
authority of the FAA Administrator. Subtitle VII: Aviation Programs,
describes in more detail the scope of the Agency's authority.
    The FAA is issuing this rulemaking under the authority described in
Subtitle VII, Part A, Subpart III, Section 44701: General requirements.
Under that section, Congress charges the FAA with promoting safe flight
of civil aircraft in air commerce by prescribing regulations for
practices, methods, and procedures the Administrator finds necessary
for safety in air commerce. This regulation is within the scope of that
authority because it addresses an unsafe condition that is likely to
exist or develop on products identified in this rulemaking action.

Regulatory Findings

    The FAA has determined that this proposed AD would not have
federalism implications under Executive Order 13132. This proposed AD
would not have a substantial direct effect on the States, on the
relationship between the national Government and the States, or on the
distribution of power and responsibilities among the various levels of
government.
    For the reasons discussed above, I certify this proposed
regulation:
    (1) Is not a ``significant regulatory action'' under Executive
Order 12866,
    (2) Would not affect intrastate aviation in Alaska, and
    (3) Would not have a significant economic impact, positive or
negative, on a substantial number of small entities under the criteria
of the Regulatory Flexibility Act.

List of Subjects in 14 CFR Part 39

    Air transportation, Aircraft, Aviation safety, Incorporation by
reference, Safety.

The Proposed Amendment

    Accordingly, under the authority delegated to me by the
Administrator, the FAA proposes to amend 14 CFR part 39 as follows:

PART 39--AIRWORTHINESS DIRECTIVES

0
1. The authority citation for part 39 continues to read as follows:

    Authority: 49 U.S.C. 106(g), 40113, 44701.

Sec.  39.13  [Amended]

0
2. The FAA amends Sec.  39.13 by adding the following new airworthiness
directive:

Airbus SAS: Docket No. FAA-2022-0812; Project Identifier MCAI-2022-
00445-T.

(a) Comments Due Date

    The FAA must receive comments on this airworthiness directive
(AD) by August 22, 2022.

(b) Affected ADs

    None.

(c) Applicability

    This AD applies to all Airbus SAS airplanes identified in
paragraphs (c)(1) through (5) of this AD, certificated in any
category.
    (1) Model A300 B4-601, B4-603, B4-620, and B4-622 airplanes.
    (2) Model A300 B4-605R and B4-622R airplanes.
    (3) Model A300 C4-605R Variant F airplanes.
    (4) Model A300 F4-605R and F4-622R airplanes.
    (5) Model A310-203, -204, -221, -222, -304, -322, -324, and -325
airplanes.

(d) Subject

    Air Transport Association (ATA) of America Code 05, Time Limits/
Maintenance Checks.

(e) Unsafe Condition

    This AD was prompted by a determination that a new airworthiness
limitation is necessary. The FAA is issuing this AD to address
safety-significant latent failures that would, in combination with
one or more other specific failures or events, result in a hazardous
or catastrophic failure condition of hydraulic systems.

(f) Compliance

    Comply with this AD within the compliance times specified,
unless already done.

(g) Requirements

    Except as specified in paragraph (h) of this AD: Comply with all
required actions and compliance times specified in, and in
accordance with, European Union Aviation Safety Agency (EASA) AD
2022-0060, dated April 1, 2022 (EASA AD 2022-0060).

(h) Exceptions to EASA AD 2022-0060

    (1) The requirements specified in paragraphs (1) and (2) of EASA
AD 2022-0060 do not apply to this AD.
    (2) Paragraph (3) of EASA AD 2022-0060 specifies revising ``the
approved AMP'' within 12 months after its effective date, but this
AD requires revising the existing maintenance or inspection program,
as applicable, within 90 days after the effective date of this AD.
    (3) The initial compliance time for doing the tasks specified in
paragraph (3) of EASA AD 2022-0060 is at the applicable
``threshold'' as incorporated by the requirements of paragraph (3)
of EASA AD

2022-0060, or within 90 days after the effective date of this AD,
whichever occurs later.
    (4) The provisions specified in paragraph (4) of EASA AD 2022-
0060 do not apply to this AD.
    (5) The ``Remarks'' section of EASA AD 2022-0060 does not apply
to this AD.

 (i) Provisions for Alternative Actions and Intervals

    After the existing maintenance or inspection program has been
revised as required by paragraph (g) of this AD, no alternative
actions (e.g., inspections) and intervals are allowed unless they
are approved as specified in the provisions of the ``Ref.
Publications'' section of EASA AD 2022-0060.

(j) Additional AD Provisions

    The following provisions also apply to this AD:
    (1) Alternative Methods of Compliance (AMOCs): The Manager,
Large Aircraft Section, International Validation Branch, FAA, has
the authority to approve AMOCs for this AD, if requested using the
procedures found in 14 CFR 39.19. In accordance with 14 CFR 39.19,
send your request to your principal inspector or responsible Flight
Standards Office, as appropriate. If sending information directly to
the Large Aircraft Section, International Validation Branch, send it
to the attention of the person identified in paragraph (k)(2) of
this AD. Information may be emailed to: [email protected].
Before using any approved AMOC, notify your appropriate principal
inspector, or lacking a principal inspector, the manager of the
local flight standards district office/certificate holding district
office.
    (2) Contacting the Manufacturer: For any requirement in this AD
to obtain instructions from a manufacturer, the instructions must be
accomplished using a method approved by the Manager, Large Aircraft
Section, International Validation Branch, FAA; or EASA; or Airbus
SAS's EASA Design Organization Approval (DOA). If approved by the
DOA, the approval must include the DOA-authorized signature.

(k) Related Information

    (1) For EASA AD 2022-0060, contact EASA, Konrad-Adenauer-Ufer 3,
50668 Cologne, Germany; telephone +49 221 8999 000; email
[email protected]; internet www.easa.europa.eu. You may find this
EASA AD on the EASA website at https://ad.easa.europa.eu. You may
view this material at the FAA, Airworthiness Products Section,
Operational Safety Branch, 2200 South 216th St., Des Moines, WA. For
information on the availability of this material at the FAA, call
206-231-3195. This material may be found in the AD docket at https://www.regulations.gov by searching for and locating Docket No. FAA-
2022-0812.
    (2) For more information about this AD, contact Dan Rodina,
Aerospace Engineer, Large Aircraft Section, International Validation
Branch, FAA, 2200 South 216th Street, Des Moines, WA 98198;
telephone<PHONE_NUMBER>; email [email protected].

    Issued on June 30, 2022.
Christina Underwood,
Acting Director, Compliance & Airworthiness Division, Aircraft
Certification Service.
[FR Doc. 2022-14443 Filed 7-7-22; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910-13-P


[Federal Register: March 31, 2010 (Volume 75, Number 61)]
[Notices]
[Page 16228-16229]
[DOCID:fr31mr10-158]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION

Federal Railroad Administration

[Docket No. FRA 2010-0005-N-6]

Agency Information Collection Activities; Comment Request

AGENCY: Federal Railroad Administration, DOT.

ACTION: Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: In accordance with the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 and its
implementing regulations, the Federal Railroad Administration (FRA)
hereby announces that it is seeking re-approval of the following
information collection activities that were previously approved by OMB
under Emergency Clearance Procedures. Before submitting these
information collection requirements for clearance by the Office of
Management and Budget (OMB), FRA is soliciting public comment on
specific aspects of the activities identified below.

DATES: Comments must be received no later than June 1, 2010.

ADDRESSES: Submit written comments on any or all of the following
proposed activities by mail to either: Mr. Robert Brogan, Office of
Safety, RRS-21, Federal Railroad Administration, 1200 New Jersey Ave.,
SE., Mail Stop 17, Washington, DC 20590, or Ms. Kimberly Toone, Office
of Information Technology, RAD-20, Federal Railroad Administration,
1200 New Jersey Ave., SE., Mail Stop 35, Washington, DC 20590.
Commenters requesting FRA to acknowledge receipt of their respective
comments must include a self-addressed stamped postcard stating,
``Comments on OMB control number 2130-0587.'' Alternatively, comments
may be transmitted via facsimile to<PHONE_NUMBER> or<PHONE_NUMBER>,
or via e-mail to Mr. Brogan at<EMAIL_ADDRESS>or to Ms. Toone
at<EMAIL_ADDRESS>Please refer to the assigned OMB control
number and the title of the information collection in any
correspondence submitted. FRA will summarize comments received in
response to this notice in a subsequent notice and include them in its
information collection submission to OMB for approval.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Mr. Robert Brogan, Office of Safety,
RRS-21, Federal Railroad Administration, 1200 New Jersey Ave., SE.,
Mail Stop 17, Washington, DC 20590 (telephone:<PHONE_NUMBER>) or Ms.
Kimberly Toone, Office of Information Technology, RAD-20, Federal
Railroad Administration, 1200 New Jersey Ave., SE., Mail Stop 35,
Washington, DC 20590 (telephone:<PHONE_NUMBER>). (These telephone
numbers are not toll-free.)

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 (PRA),
Public Law 104-13, section 2, 109 Stat. 163 (1995) (codified as revised
at 44 U.S.C. 3501-3520), and its implementing regulations, 5 CFR part
1320, require Federal agencies to provide 60 days' notice to the public
for comment on information collection activities before seeking
approval of such activities by OMB. 44 U.S.C. 3506(c)(2)(A); 5 CFR
1320.8(d)(1), 1320.10(e)(1), 1320.12(a). Specifically, FRA invites
interested respondents to comment on the following summary of proposed
information collection activities regarding (i) Whether the information
collection activities are necessary for FRA to properly execute its
functions, including whether the activities will have practical
utility; (ii) the accuracy of FRA's estimates of the burden of the
information collection activities, including the validity of the
methodology and assumptions used to determine the estimates; (iii) ways
for FRA to enhance the quality, utility, and clarity of the information
being collected; and (iv) ways for FRA to minimize the burden of
information collection activities on the public by automated,
electronic, mechanical, or other technological collection techniques or
other forms of information technology (e.g., permitting electronic
submission of responses). See 44 U.S.C. 3506(c)(2)(A)(I)-(iv); 5 CFR
1320.8(d)(1)(I)-(iv). FRA believes that soliciting public comment will
promote its efforts to reduce the administrative and paperwork burdens
associated with the collection of information mandated by Federal
regulations. In summary, FRA reasons that comments received will
advance three objectives: (i) Reduce reporting burdens; (ii) ensure
that it organizes information collection requirements in a ``user
friendly'' format to improve the use of such information; and (iii)
accurately assess the resources expended to retrieve and produce
information requested. See 44 U.S.C. 3501.
    Below is a brief summary of the information collection activities
that FRA will submit for renewed clearance by OMB as required under the
PRA:

    Title: Notice of Funding Availability and Solicitation of
Applications for Grants under the Railroad Safety Technology Grant
Program.
    OMB Control Number: 2130-0587.
    Abstract: The Rail Safety Technology Program is a newly authorized
program under the Rail Safety Improvement Act of 2008 (RSIA) (Pub. L.
110-432; October 16, 2008). The program was directed by Congress and
passed into law in the aftermath of a series of major rail accidents
that culminated in an accident at Chatsworth, California, in 2008.
Twenty-five people were killed and 135 people were injured in the
Chatsworth accident. This event turned the Nation's attention to rail
safety and the possibility that new technologies, such as PTC, could
prevent such accidents in the future. The RSIA ordered installation of
PTC by all Class I railroads on any of their mainlines carrying
poisonous inhalation hazard (PIH) materials and by all passenger and
commuter railroads on their main lines not later than December 31,
2015.
    As part of the RSIA, Congress provided $50 million to FRA to award,
in one or more grants, to eligible projects by passenger and freight
rail carriers, railroad suppliers, and State and local Governments.
Funds will be awarded to projects that have a public benefit of
improved railroad safety and efficiency, with priority given to
projects that make PTC technologies interoperable between railroad
systems; projects that accelerate the deployment of PTC technology on
high-risk corridors, such as those that have high volumes of hazardous
material shipments; and for projects over which commuter or passenger
trains operate, or that benefit both passenger and freight safety and
efficiency.
    Funds provided under this grant program may constitute a maximum of
80 percent of the total cost of a selected project, with a minimum of
20 percent of costs funded from other sources. The funding provided
under these grants will be made available to grantees on a
reimbursement basis. FRA anticipates awarding grants to multiple
eligible participants. FRA may choose to award a grant or grants within
the available funds in any amount. Funding made available through
grants provided under this program, together with funding from other
sources that is committed by a grantee as part of a grant agreement,
must be sufficient to complete the funded project and achieve the
anticipated technology development. FRA will begin accepting grant
applications 10 days after publication of the separate Notice of Funds
Availability, which will be published on March 29, 2010, in the Federal
Register detailing the terms of the Railroad Safety Technology Grant
Program. Applications may be submitted until July 1, 2010. Selection
announcements will be made on or around September 3, 2010.
    Form Number(s): FRA F 6180.146; SF-269; SF-270.
    Other Instruments: Information Published with the Notice of Funds
Availability (NOFA) to be published shortly in the Federal Register.
    Affected Public: Businesses.
    Respondent Universe: 50 railroads.
    Frequency of Submission: On occasion.

                                                Reporting Burden
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
                                        Respondent          Total annual      Average time  per    Total annual
          Grant program                  universe            responses             response        burden hours
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Pre-Application Process:
    --Certification Statements     50 Railroads.......  50 statements/forms  2 minutes..........               2
     (Form FRA F 6180.146).
    --Application Process........  50 Railroads.......  50 grant             250 hours..........          12,500
                                                         applications.
    --Meeting requests with FRA    50 Railroads.......  25 meeting requests  30 minutes.........              13
     Associate Administrator.
    --Face to Face Meetings with   50 Railroads.......  25 project meetings  2 hours............              50
     Associate Admin.
    --Revisions to Grant           50 Railroads.......  10 grant             40 hours...........             400
     Applications.                                       application
                                                         revisions.
    --Execution Process (Progress  50 Railroads.......  120 progress         1 hour.............             120
     Reports).                                           reports.
--Close-Out Procedures:
    --Financial Status Report (SF- 50 Railroads.......  10 forms...........  30 minutes.........               5
     269).
    --Audit (OMB A-133 or 49 CFR   50 Railroads.......  10 audit documents.  34 hours...........             340
     19.26).
    --Audit Correction Plan......  50 Railorads.......  1 plan.............  24 hours...........              24
    --Final Progress Report......  50 Railroads.......  10 reports.........  3 hours............              30
    --Final Request for Payment    50 Railroads.......  10 forms...........  1 hour.............              10
     (SF-270).
    --Federal Owner Property       50 Railroads.......  5 reports..........  3 hours............              15
     Report.
    --Final Technical Report.....  50 Railroads.......  10 reports.........  40 hours...........             400
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

    Total Responses: 336.
    Estimated Total Annual Burden 13,909 hours.
    Status: Re-Approval under Regular Clearance Procedures
    Pursuant to 44 U.S.C. 3507(a) and 5 CFR 1320.5(b),
1320.8(b)(3)(vi), FRA informs all interested parties that it may not
conduct or sponsor, and a respondent is not required to respond to, a
collection of information unless it displays a currently valid OMB
control number.

    Authority:  44 U.S.C. 3501-3520.

    Issued in Washington, DC on March 26, 2010.
Donna Alwine,
Acting Director, Office of Financial Management, Federal Railroad
Administration.
[FR Doc. 2010-7201 Filed 3-30-10; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910-06-P


[Federal Register Volume 76, Number 42 (Thursday, March 3, 2011)]
[Proposed Rules]
[Pages 11699-11700]
[FR Doc No: 2011-4812]

=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION

Office of the Secretary of Transportation

14 CFR Chapters I, II, III

23 CFR Chapters I, II, III

46 CFR Chapter II

48 CFR Chapter 12

49 CFR Chapters I, II, III and V, VI, VII, VIII, X, XI

[Docket No. DOT-OST-2011-0025]

Notice of Retrospective Review of DOT Existing Regulations

AGENCY: Office of the Secretary of Transportation (OST), DOT.

ACTION: Notice of public meeting and tentative agenda; opportunities
for public participation in review.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: On February 16, 2011, Department of Transportation (DOT)
published a notice of regulatory review of existing DOT regulations.
This review is in accordance with Executive Order 13563, ``Improving
Regulation and Regulatory Review.'' As part of the notice of review,
DOT announced it will hold a public meeting to discuss and consider the
public's comments. This notice provides information on how to
participate in this meeting and opportunities for enhanced public
participation in the review and the public meeting. Please note that
the deadline for registering to speak at the public meeting has been
extended to March 7, 2011.

DATES:
Deadline to register to attend hearing in person/watch Web stream/
listen by phone--March 7, 2011.
Deadline to register to speak in person/by phone at the meeting--March
7, 2011.
Agenda released on http://regs.dot.gov--March 9, 2011.
Web streaming/call-in info distributed to registrants--March 10, 2011.
Deadline to submit any digital presentation materials--March 10, 2011.
Public Meeting--March 14, 2011--9:30 a.m.-4:30 p.m.

ADDRESSES:
    Public Meeting Location: The public meeting will be held in the DOT
Conference Center's Media Center, located on the ground floor of 1200
New Jersey Avenue, SE., Washington, DC 20590.
    DOT Regulatory Review IdeaScale Web site: http://dotregreview.ideascale.com/.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Jennifer Abdul-Wali, Office of
Regulation and Enforcement, Department of Transportation, (202) 366-
6322; e-mail<EMAIL_ADDRESS>
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

Background

    On January 18, 2011, President Obama issued Executive Order 13563,
which outlined a plan to improve regulation and regulatory review (76
FR 3821, January 31, 2011). Executive Order 13563 reaffirms and builds
upon governing principles of contemporary regulatory review, including
Executive Order 12866, ``Regulatory Planning and Review'' (58 FR 51735,
October 4, 1993), by requiring Federal agencies to design cost-
effective, evidence-based regulations that are compatible with economic
growth, job creation, and competitiveness. The President's plan
recognizes that these principles should not only guide the Federal
government's approach to new regulation, but to existing ones as well.
To that end, Executive Order 13563 requires agencies to review existing
significant rules to determine if they are outmoded, ineffective,
insufficient, or excessively burdensome.
    On February 16, 2011, DOT published a notice of regulatory review
(76 FR 8940) that invited public comment on how to effectively
implement Executive Order 13563 and set forth a number of issues and
questions. Our notice stated that we would hold a public meeting on
March 14, 2011. The following section provides the procedures for
participating in the meeting and our IdeaScale Web site that can also
be used to submit comments to DOT.

Public Meeting Procedures

    1. As stated in our February 16 notice, those who wish to make
presentations at the meeting should submit initial comments with
sufficient details with

their registration to enable DOT to set an agenda and ensure that the
appropriate officials are present for the discussions. We hope to be
able to accommodate everyone who would like to speak at the meeting,
but if there are more interested participants than time available, we
will limit participants in order of date and time of registration. When
registering to speak, please also estimate the amount of time that you
would like to use for your presentation; final times will be allotted
to participants based on the time available and the issues raised in
their initial comments. Any person wishing to present an oral statement
should notify Jennifer Abdul-Wali at the address above by March 7,
2011; any digital presentation materials for the meeting should be
submitted to her by March 10, 2011. If available, time will be given
for those people attending the meeting in person to speak, even if they
had not previously registered to speak.
    2. Due to security requirements, all public attendees must register
to ensure their access to the building. To register, contact Jennifer
Abdul-Wali. Foreign National registrants must provide your full name,
title, country of citizenship, date of birth, passport number, and
passport expiration date when registering. Because seating space is
limited, we may have to limit attendees in order of date and time of
registration.
    3. Attendees are encouraged to arrive early for processing through
security. All participants and attendees must enter through the New
Jersey Avenue entrance (West Building--at the corner of New Jersey
Avenue and M Street, SE.). Photo identification is required and Foreign
National attendees must bring their passports with them. Participants
or attendees who have Federal government identification will still need
to register to attend. To facilitate security screening, all
participants and attendees are encouraged to limit the bags and other
items (laptops, cameras, etc.) they bring into the building. Anyone
exiting the building for any reason will be required to re-enter
through the security checkpoint at the New Jersey Avenue entrance.
    4. DOT does not offer visitor parking; we suggest that attendees
consider using alternative means of transportation to the building. DOT
Headquarters is served by Metrorail (Navy Yard station), Metrobus, DC
Circulator, and taxi service. There are a number of private parking
lots near the DOT building, but the DOT cannot guarantee the
availability of parking spaces.
    5. For information on facilities or services for persons with
disabilities, or to request special assistance at the meeting, contact
Ms. Abdul-Wali as soon as possible.
    6. For those unable to attend the public meeting in person, it will
be broadcast via Web streaming (with captioning) and over a listen-only
phone line. Registrants will be given the Web URL or phone number on
March 10, 2011. Because the number of people who can participate in Web
streaming and by phone is limited, we will provide access in order of
date and time of registration.
    7. We will post an Agenda for the public meeting at http://regs.dot.gov by March 9, 2011.
    8. DOT's General Counsel will preside over the public meeting.
Senior officials of DOT's operating administrations also will attend
this meeting as part of a panel with the General Counsel to receive
comments from the public. During the hearing, we may ask questions that
will clarify statements or gather more information or data to help us
understand the problems or issues raised by commenters.
    9. The meeting is designed to solicit public views and gather
additional information for our regulatory review. Therefore, the
meeting will be conducted in an informal and non-adversarial manner. In
developing prepared remarks, participants should leave time during
their remarks for questions and discussion by the panel.
    10. We plan to make a record of the meeting available to the
public; information about how to access the record will be placed in
the docket and posted on http://regs.dot.gov.

DOT IdeaScale Web Site

    In order to provide the public with alternative means of providing
feedback to DOT in ways that may better suit their needs, we have
created a Web site using IdeaScale that will allow submissions to DOT
in a less formal manner. This Web site will provide members of the
public an opportunity to submit their ideas about our regulatory
review, categorized by the DOT Operating Administration that
administers the regulation. Participants in this site may discuss one
another's ideas and agree/disagree with others. This Web site may be
particularly useful for individuals and small entities (including
State, local, and Tribal governments) who prefer a less formal method
of submitting ideas to DOT. It may also assist participants in refining
their suggestions and gathering additional information or data to
support those suggestions.
    To ensure that ideas are most useful in informing our deliberation
and decision process, you should include the citation to the regulation
on which you are commenting (e.g. 49 CFR 1.69), a description of any
concerns regarding the regulation (e.g. it is duplicative, too costly,
etc.), and any supporting information (e.g., the citation to a
duplicative regulation or actual cost or benefit data) that would
assist DOT in making a decision. Please also include in your comment
whether you found this Web site useful for your purposes, so that we
can best plan how to deploy DOT's scarce resources to most effectively
reach the public in the future. To go directly to the IdeaScale Web
site use the following link: http://dotregreview.ideascale.com/.

Follow-Up Action by DOT

    The comments received during our review will provide meaningful and
significant information for DOT senior officials, including those in
the Office of the Secretary and each of DOT's operating
administrations. As soon as possible after the public meeting and the
close of the comment period, taking account of the number of comments
received and the complexity of issues raised, DOT will publish a report
providing at least a brief response to the comments we receive,
including a description of any further action we intend to take.

Privacy Act Statement

    Anyone is able to search all comments entered into any of our
dockets by the name of the individual submitting the comment (or
signing the comment, if submitted on behalf of an association,
business, labor union, etc.). You may review DOT's complete Privacy Act
Statement in the Federal Register published on April 11, 2000 (65 FR
19476, 04/11/2011) or at http://www.dot.gov/privacy.html.

    Authority: 5 U.S.C. 610; E.O. 13563, 76 FR 3821, Jan. 21 2011;
E.O. 12866, 58 FR 51735, Oct. 4, 1993.)

    Issued on February 25, 2011, in Washington, DC.
Robert S. Rivkin,
General Counsel.
[FR Doc. 2011-4812 Filed 3-2-11; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910-9X-P


[Federal Register: October 29, 2009 (Volume 74, Number 208)]
[Notices]
[Page 55842-55843]
[DOCID:fr29oc09-79]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY

[EPA-HQ-OPP-2008-0927; FRL-8975-5]

Agency Information Collection Activities; Submission to OMB for
Review and Approval; Comment Request; Tolerance Petitions for
Pesticides on Food/Feed Crops and New Inert Ingredients; EPA ICR No.
0597.10, OMB Control No. 2070-0024

AGENCY: Environmental Protection Agency (EPA).

ACTION: Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: In compliance with the Paperwork Reduction Act (PRA) (44
U.S.C. 3501 et seq.), this document announces that an Information
Collection Request (ICR) has been forwarded to the Office of Management
and Budget (OMB) for review and approval. This is a request to renew an
existing approved collection. The ICR, which is abstracted below,
describes the nature of the information collection and its estimated
burden and cost.

DATES: Additional comments may be submitted on or before November 30,
2009.

ADDRESSES: Submit your comments, referencing Docket ID No. EPA-HQ-OPP-
2008-0927, to (1) EPA online using http://www.regulations.gov (our
preferred method), or by mail to: EPA Docket Center, Environmental
Protection Agency, Office of Pesticide Programs (OPP), Regulatory
Public Docket (7502P), 1200 Pennsylvania Ave., NW., Washington, DC
20460-0001, and (2) OMB by mail to: Office of Information and
Regulatory Affairs, Office of Management and Budget (OMB), Attention:
Desk Officer for EPA, 725 17th Street, NW., Washington, DC 20503.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Lily Negash, Field and External
Affairs Division, (7506P), Environmental Protection Agency, 1200
Pennsylvania Ave., NW., Washington, DC 20460; telephone number: 703-
347-8515; fax number:<PHONE_NUMBER>; e-mail address:
<EMAIL_ADDRESS>
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: EPA has submitted the following ICR to OMB
for review and approval according to the procedures prescribed in 5 CFR
1320.12. On February 25, 2009 (74 FR 8537), EPA sought comments on this
ICR pursuant to 5 CFR 1320.8(d). EPA received one comment during the
comment period, which is addressed in the ICR. Any additional comments
on this ICR should be submitted to EPA and OMB within 30 days of this
notice.
    EPA has established a public docket for this ICR under Docket ID
No. EPA-HQ-OPP-2008-0927, which is available for online viewing at
http://www.regulations.gov, or in person viewing at the OPP Regulatory
Public Docket in Rm. S-4400, One Potomac Yard (South Bldg.), 2777 S.
Crystal Dr., Arlington, VA. The hours of operation of this Docket
Facility are from 8:30 a.m. to 4 p.m., Monday through Friday, excluding
legal holidays. The Docket Facility telephone number is<PHONE_NUMBER>.
    Use EPA's electronic docket and comment system at http://
www.regulations.gov, to submit or view public comments, access the
index listing of the contents of the docket, and to access those
documents in the docket that are available electronically. Once in the
system, select ``docket search,'' then key in the docket ID number
identified above. Please note that EPA's policy is that public
comments, whether submitted electronically or in paper, will be made
available for public viewing at http://www.regulations.gov as EPA
receives them and without change, unless the comment contains
copyrighted material, confidential business information (CBI), or other
information whose public disclosure is restricted by statute. For
further information about the electronic docket, go to http://
www.regulations.gov.
    Title: Tolerance Petitions for Pesticides on Food/Feed Crops and
New Inert Ingredients.
    ICR numbers: EPA ICR No. 0597.10, OMB Control No. 2070-0024.
    ICR Status: This ICR is scheduled to expire on November 30, 2009.
Under OMB regulations, the Agency may continue to conduct or sponsor
the collection of information while this submission is pending at OMB.
An Agency may not conduct or sponsor, and a person is not required to
respond to, a collection of information, unless it displays a currently
valid OMB control number. The OMB control numbers for EPA's regulations
in title 40 of the CFR, after appearing in the Federal Register when
approved, are listed in 40 CFR part 9, are displayed either by
publication in the Federal Register or by other appropriate means, such
as on the related collection instrument or form, if applicable. The
display of OMB control numbers in certain EPA regulations is
consolidated in 40 CFR part 9.
    Abstract: This information collection will enable EPA to collect
adequate data to support the establishment of pesticide tolerances
pursuant to section 408 of the Federal Food, Drug and Cosmetic Act
(FFDCA). A pesticide may not be used on food or feed crops unless EPA
has established a tolerance for the pesticide residues on that crop, or
established an exemption from the requirement to have a tolerance.
Responses to this collection are required to obtain tolerances or
exemptions from tolerances for pesticides used on food or feed crops,
pursuant to section 408 of FFDCA, 21 U.S.C. 346a, as amended by FQPA
(Pub. L. 104-170). Confidential Business Information (CBI) submitted to
EPA in response to this information collection is protected from
disclosure under FIFRA Section 10.
    This ICR only applies to the information collection activities
associated with the submission of a petition for a tolerance action. It
is EPA's responsibility to ensure that the maximum residue levels
likely to be found in or on food/feed crops are safe for human
consumption through a careful review and evaluation of residue
chemistry and toxicology data. In addition, it must ensure that
adequate enforcement of the tolerance can be achieved through the
testing of submitted analytical methods. If the data are adequate for
EPA to determine that there is a reasonable certainty that no harm will
result from aggregate exposure, the Agency will establish the tolerance
or grant an exemption from the requirement of a tolerance.
    Burden Statement: The annual public reporting and recordkeeping
burden for this collection of information is estimated to average 1,726
hours per response for petitions submitted by pesticide registrants and
1,739 hours per response for petitions submitted by IR-4 participants.
Burden means the total time, effort, or financial resources expended by
persons to generate, maintain, retain, or disclose or provide

information to or for a Federal agency. This includes the time needed
to review instructions; develop, acquire, install, and utilize
technology and systems for the purposes of collecting, validating, and
verifying information, processing and maintaining information, and
disclosing and providing information; adjust the existing ways to
comply with any previously applicable instructions and requirements
which have subsequently changed; train personnel to be able to respond
to a collection of information; search data sources; complete and
review the collection of information; and transmit or otherwise
disclose the information.
    Respondents/Affected Entities: Entities potentially affected by
this ICR include individuals or entities engaged in activities related
to the registration of a pesticide product, which may be identified by
the North American Industrial Classification System (NAICS) code
325320.
    Estimated Number of Respondents: 103.
    Frequency of Response: As needed.
    Estimated Total Annual Hour Burden: 178,285.
    Estimated Total Annual Cost: $14,103,722. This ICR does not involve
any capital investment or maintenance and operational costs.
    Changes in the Estimates: There is a net decrease of 80,615 hours
in the total estimated burden currently identified in the OMB Inventory
of Approved ICR Burdens. EPA anticipates that 47 fewer tolerance
petitions will be received annually compared to the previous three
years (2006, 2007, and 2008). This would result in a corresponding
81,122 hour reduction in estimated annual burden. The change is an
adjustment. In addition, EPA estimates that IR-4 petitioners are
changing the way in which they compile tolerance petitions for
submission to EPA in an effort to capture the new fee waiver incentives
under the Pesticide Registration Improvement Renewal Act. This change
in IR-4 petition preparation results in an additional 13 hours per
response, resulting in a program change increase of 507 hours annually.

    Dated: October 23, 2009.
Richard T. Westlund,
Acting Director, Collection Strategies Division.
[FR Doc. E9-26089 Filed 10-28-09; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 6560-50-P


[Federal Register: December 9, 2005 (Volume 70, Number 236)]
[Notices]
[Page 73219]
[DOCID:fr09de05-54]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission

[Docket No. PR06-4-000]

J-W Pipeline Company; Notice of Petition for Rate Approval

December 2, 2005.
    Take notice that on November 21, 2005, J-W Pipeline Company (J-W
Pipeline) filed a petition for rate approval pursuant to section
284.123(b)(2) of the Commission's regulations. J-W Pipeline proposes
the following rates for its NGPA section 311(a)(2) transportation
services on its Gravel Point South and Kingston Lanes: a demand charge
of $.6547 per MMBtu for firm transportation, with no commodity charge
for firm service, and a $.0215 per MMBtu for interruptible
transportation. J-W Pipeline also requests authority to retain from its
shippers actual compressor fuel and lost-and-unaccounted-for volumes on
the system, not to exceed 2% of volumes received by J-W Pipeline.
    Any person desiring to participate in this rate proceeding must
file a motion to intervene or to protest this filing must file in
accordance with Rules 211 and 214 of the Commission's Rules of Practice
and Procedure (18 CFR 385.211 and 385.214). Protests will be considered
by the Commission in determining the appropriate action to be taken,
but will not serve to make protestants parties to the proceeding. Any
person wishing to become a party must file a notice of intervention or
motion to intervene, as appropriate. Such notices, motions, or protests
must be filed on or before the date as indicated below. Anyone filing
an intervention or protest must serve a copy of that document on the
Applicant. Anyone filing an intervention or protest on or before the
intervention or protest date need not serve motions to intervene or
protests on persons other than the Applicant.
    The Commission encourages electronic submission of protests and
interventions in lieu of paper using the ``eFiling'' link at http://www.ferc.gov.
 Persons unable to file electronically should submit an

original and 14 copies of the protest or intervention to the Federal
Energy Regulatory Commission, 888 First Street, NE., Washington, DC
20426.
    This filing is accessible on-line at http://www.ferc.gov, using the

``eLibrary'' link and is available for review in the Commission's
Public Reference Room in Washington, DC. There is an ``eSubscription''
link on the Web site that enables subscribers to receive email
notification when a document is added to a subscribed docket(s). For
assistance with any FERC Online service, please e-mail
<EMAIL_ADDRESS>or call<PHONE_NUMBER> (toll free). For

TTY, call<PHONE_NUMBER>.
    Comment Date: 5 p.m. eastern time December 23, 2005.

Magalie R. Salas,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. E5-7143 Filed 12-8-05; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 6717-01-P


[Federal Register Volume 84, Number 67 (Monday, April 8, 2019)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Pages 13800-13803]
[FR Doc No: 2019-06740]

=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY

40 CFR Part 52

[EPA-R04-OAR-2018-0799; FRL-9991-82-Region 4]

Air Plan Approval; Kentucky; Regional Haze Plan and Prong 4
(Visibility) for the 1997 Ozone, 2010 NO2, 2010 SO2, and 2012 PM2.5
NAAQS

AGENCY: Environmental Protection Agency (EPA).

ACTION: Final rule.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) is taking four
actions regarding the Kentucky State Implementation Plan (SIP).
Specifically, EPA is approving Kentucky's November 16, 2018, SIP
submittal seeking to change reliance from the Clean Air Interstate Rule
(CAIR) to the Cross-State Air Pollution Rule (CSAPR) for certain
regional haze requirements; converting EPA's limited approval/limited
disapproval of Kentucky's regional haze SIP to a full approval;
removing EPA's Federal Implementation Plan (FIP) for Kentucky which
relied on CSAPR to address the deficiencies identified in the limited
disapproval of Kentucky's regional haze SIP; and approving the
visibility prong of Kentucky's infrastructure SIP submittals for the
1997 8-hour Ozone, 2010 Nitrogen Dioxide (NO2), 2010 Sulfur
Dioxide (SO2), and 2012 Fine Particulate Matter
(PM2.5) National Ambient Air Quality Standards (NAAQS).

DATES: This rule will be effective May 8, 2019.

ADDRESSES: EPA has established a docket for this action under Docket
Identification No. EPA-R04-OAR-2018-0799. All documents in the dockets
are listed on the www.regulations.gov website. Although listed in the
index, some information may not be publicly available, i.e.,
Confidential Business Information or other information whose disclosure
is restricted by statute. Certain other material, such as copyrighted
material, is not placed on the internet and will be publicly available
only in hard copy form. Publicly available docket materials are
available either electronically through www.regulations.gov or in hard
copy at the Air Regulatory Management Section, Air Planning and
Implementation Branch, Air, Pesticides and Toxics Management Division,
U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Region 4, 61 Forsyth Street SW,
Atlanta, Georgia 30303-8960. EPA requests that if at all possible, you
contact the person listed in the FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT
section to schedule your inspection. The Regional Office's official
hours of business are Monday through Friday 8:30 a.m. to 4:30 p.m.,
excluding Federal holidays.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Michele Notarianni, Air Regulatory
Management Section, Air Planning and Implementation Branch, Air,
Pesticides and Toxics Management Division, U.S. Environmental
Protection Agency, Region 4, 61 Forsyth Street SW, Atlanta, Georgia
30303-8960. Ms. Notarianni can be reached by telephone at (404) 562-
9031 or via electronic mail [email protected].

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

I. Background

    On March 30, 2012, EPA finalized a limited approval and a limited
disapproval of SIP revisions submitted by Kentucky on June 25, 2008,
and May 28, 2010, addressing regional haze program requirements.\1\ The
limited disapproval of these SIP revisions was based upon, and limited
to, the Commonwealth's reliance on CAIR as an alternative to best
available retrofit technology (BART) for nitrogen oxide
(NOX) and SO2 at certain electric generating
units (EGUs); as a measure for reasonable progress with respect to
SO2 emissions from these units during the first
implementation period; \2\ and as an element of a long-term strategy
(LTS) for achieving its reasonable progress goals (RPGs).\3\ In the
March 30, 2012,

action, EPA determined that Kentucky's regional haze SIP revisions
satisfied all other necessary elements for a fully approvable regional
haze program, including BART for particulate matter (PM) at EGUs
formerly subject to CAIR. On June 7, 2012, EPA finalized a FIP for
Kentucky (hereinafter referred to as the ``partial Regional Haze FIP'')
that replaced reliance on CAIR with reliance on CSAPR to meet
NOX and SO2 BART for EGUs formerly subject to
CAIR thereby addressing the deficiencies in the Commonwealth's CAIR-
dependent regional haze SIP.\4\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \1\ See 77 FR 19098.
    \2\ EPA approved Kentucky's determination in its regional haze
SIP revisions to focus solely on evaluating SO2 emissions
from EGU and non-EGU point sources in its reasonable progress
analysis for the first implementation period. See 77 FR 19098 (March
30, 2012). Kentucky based its determination on a sensitivity
analysis from the Visibility Improvement State and Tribal
Association of the Southeast (VISTAS) regional planning organization
demonstrating that sulfate particles resulting from SO2
emissions are the dominant contributor to visibility impairment on
the 20 percent worst days at all Class I areas in the VISTAS states,
including Kentucky. For more information, see 76 FR 78194 (December
16, 2011).
    \3\ EPA demonstrated that CAIR would achieve greater reasonable
progress than BART in revisions to the regional haze program made in
2005. See 70 FR 39104 (July 6, 2005). In those revisions, EPA
amended its regulations to provide that states participating in the
CAIR cap-and-trade programs pursuant to an EPA-approved CAIR SIP or
states that remain subject to a CAIR FIP need not require affected
BART-eligible EGUs to install, operate, and maintain BART for
emissions of SO2 and NOX. As a result of EPA's
determination that CAIR was ``better-than-BART,'' a number of states
in the CAIR region, including Kentucky, relied on the CAIR cap-and-
trade programs as an alternative to BART for EGU emissions of
SO2 and NOX in designing their regional haze
plans. These states also relied on CAIR as an element of an LTS for
achieving their reasonable progress goals (RPGs) for their regional
haze programs. However, in 2008, the United States Court of Appeals
for the District of Columbia Circuit (D.C. Circuit) remanded CAIR to
EPA without vacatur to preserve the environmental benefits provided
by CAIR. North Carolina v. EPA, 550 F.3d 1176, 1178 (D.C. Cir.
2008). On August 8, 2011 (76 FR 48208), acting on the D.C. Circuit's
remand, EPA promulgated CSAPR to replace CAIR and issued FIPs to
implement the rule in CSAPR-subject states. CSAPR has now replaced
the CAIR program. Kentucky is subject to the CSAPR annual
NOX, ozone-season NOX, and SO2
trading programs.
    \4\ 77 FR 33642.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    On November 16, 2018, Kentucky submitted a SIP revision to change
its reliance from CAIR to CSAPR for the purpose of meeting the
NOX and SO2 BART requirements for EGUs formerly
subject to CAIR; the reasonable progress requirements with respect to
SO2 emissions from these units; and the requirement that an
LTS contain all measures necessary to achieve reasonable progress,
thereby eliminating the Commonwealth's need for the partial Regional
Haze FIP. Kentucky also submitted the SIP revision to satisfy its
outstanding interstate visibility transport obligations under section
110(a)(2)(D)(i)(II) of the CAA (also known as ``prong 4''). Thus,
Kentucky is seeking EPA approval for its 1997 8-hour ozone
infrastructure SIP (iSIP) submission (December 13, 2007); 2010 1-hour
NO2 and 2010 1-hour SO2 iSIP submission (April
26, 2013); and annual PM2.5 iSIP submission (February 8,
2016).\5\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \5\ By statute, plans meeting the requirements of sections
110(a)(1) and (2) of the CAA are to be submitted by states within
three years (or less, if the Administrator so prescribes) after
promulgation of a new or revised NAAQS to provide for the
implementation, maintenance, and enforcement of the new or revised
NAAQS. EPA has historically referred to these SIP submissions made
for the purpose of satisfying the requirements of sections 110(a)(1)
and 110(a)(2) as ``infrastructure SIP'' submissions.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    Prong 4 requires that a state's implementation plan include
adequate provisions prohibiting any source or other type of emissions
activity in one state from interfering with measures to protect
visibility required to be included in another state's implementation
plan. EPA's 2013 Guidance on Infrastructure SIP Elements under Clean
Air Act Sections 110(a)(1) and 110(a)(2) (2013 Guidance) provides that
one way a state may demonstrate that its SIP will ensure that emissions
from the state will not interfere with measures required to be in other
states' plans to protect visibility (i.e., to satisfy prong 4) is
through confirmation in its infrastructure SIP submission that it has
an approved regional haze SIP that fully meets the requirements of 40
CFR 51.308 or 51.309.\6\ Kentucky's aforementioned iSIPs rely on the
Commonwealth's regional haze SIP to satisfy prong 4 requirements;
therefore, today's full approval of Kentucky's regional haze SIP allows
for approval of the prong 4 elements in these iSIPs.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \6\ See EPA, Guidance on Infrastructure State Implementation
Plan (SIP) Elements under Clean Air Act Sections 110(a)(1) and
110(a)(2), at 33 (Sept. 13, 2013), available at https://www3.epa.gov/airquality/urbanair/sipstatus/docs/Guidance_on_Infrastructure_SIP_Elements_Multipollutant_FINAL_Sept_2013.pdf.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    On February 15, 2019 (84 FR 4407), EPA published a notice of
proposed rulemaking (NPRM) proposing to: (1) Approve Kentucky's
November 16, 2018, SIP submission to change reliance from CAIR to CSAPR
in its regional haze SIP; (2) convert EPA's limited approval/limited
disapproval of Kentucky's regional haze SIP to a full approval; (3)
remove EPA's FIP for Kentucky which replaced reliance on CAIR with
reliance on CSAPR to address the deficiencies identified in the limited
disapproval of Kentucky's regional haze SIP; and (4) approve the prong
4 portions of Kentucky's 1997 8-hour ozone iSIP submission (December
13, 2007); 2010 1-hour NO2 and 2010 1-hour SO2
iSIP submission (April 26, 2013); and 2012 annual PM2.5 iSIP
submission (February 8, 2016). EPA did not receive any comments on its
February 15, 2019, proposal.

II. Summary of SIP Revision and EPA Analysis

    Kentucky's November 16, 2018, SIP revision corrects the
deficiencies identified by EPA in the June 7, 2012 limited disapproval
of the Commonwealth's regional haze SIP by replacing reliance on CAIR
with reliance on CSAPR. As discussed in the NPRM in greater detail, EPA
finds that this SIP revision satisfies the NOX and
SO2 BART requirements for EGUs formerly subject to CAIR; the
reasonable progress requirements with respect to SO2
emissions from these units; and the requirement that an LTS contain all
measures necessary to achieve reasonable progress, and thus, allows for
a fully-approvable regional haze SIP.
    EPA finds that the Commonwealth's reliance on CSAPR for certain
BART, reasonable progress, and LTS requirements is in accordance with
the CAA and regional haze rule requirements (including 40 CFR
51.308(e)(2)), as EPA has recently affirmed that CSAPR remains an
appropriate alternative to source-specific BART controls for EGUs
participating in CSAPR.\7\ In that action, EPA determined that changes
to CSAPR's geographic scope resulting from the actions that EPA has
taken in response to the CSAPR budget remand in EME Homer City
Generation, L.P. v. EPA, 795 F.3d 118 (D.C. Cir. 2015) do not affect
the continued validity of participation in CSAPR as a BART
alternative.\8\ Because the deficiencies in Kentucky's regional haze
SIP that were identified in EPA's limited disapproval are addressed
through the November 16, 2018 SIP revision, the Agency is now fully
approving the Commonwealth's regional haze SIP.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \7\ See 82 FR 45481 (September 29, 2017).
    \8\ Numerous parties filed petitions for review of CSAPR in the
D.C. Circuit, and on August 21, 2012, the court issued its ruling,
vacating and remanding CSAPR to EPA and ordering continued
implementation of CAIR. EME Homer City Generation, L.P. v. EPA, 696
F.3d 7, 38 (D.C. Cir. 2012). The D.C. Circuit's vacatur of CSAPR was
reversed by the United States Supreme Court on April 29, 2014, and
the case was remanded to the D.C. Circuit to resolve remaining
issues in accordance with the high court's ruling. EPA v. EME Homer
City Generation, L.P., 134 S. Ct. 1584 (2014). On remand, the D.C.
Circuit affirmed CSAPR in most respects, but invalidated without
vacating some of the CSAPR budgets as to a number of states. EME
Homer City Generation, L.P. v. EPA, 795 F.3d 118 (D.C. Cir. 2015).
The remanded budgets included the Phase 2 SO2 emissions
budgets for four states and the Phase 2 ozone-season NOX
budgets for 11 states. The court did not invalidate the CSAPR
budgets for Kentucky.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    Additionally, EPA finds that the prong 4 portions of Kentucky's
iSIP submittals for the 1997 8-hour ozone, 2010 1-hour NO2,
2010 1-hour SO2, and 2012 annual PM2.5 NAAQS are
fully approvable because Kentucky now has a fully-approved regional
haze SIP. The specific details of these iSIP revisions and the November
16, 2018 regional haze SIP revision and the rationale for EPA's
approval of these SIP revisions are discussed in the NPRM.

III. Final Action

    EPA finds that Kentucky's November 16, 2018, SIP revision satisfies
the NOX and SO2 BART requirements for EGUs
formerly subject to CAIR; the Commonwealth's reasonable progress
obligations with respect to SO2 emissions from these EGUs;
and, in combination with the previously approved elements of Kentucky's
regional haze SIP, the requirement that

the Commonwealth's LTS contain the measures necessary to achieve
reasonable progress. Accordingly, EPA is taking the following actions:
(1) Approving Kentucky's November 16, 2018, SIP submission to change
reliance from CAIR to CSAPR in the Commonwealth's regional haze SIP;
(2) converting EPA's limited approval/limited disapproval of Kentucky's
regional haze SIP to a full approval; (3) removing EPA's FIP for
Kentucky which replaced reliance on CAIR with reliance on CSAPR to
address the deficiencies identified in the limited disapproval of
Kentucky's regional haze SIP; and (4) approving the prong 4 portion of
Kentucky's 1997 8-hour Ozone iSIP submission (December 13, 2007); 2010
1-hour NO2 and 2010 1-hour SO2 iSIP submission
(April 26, 2013); and 2012 annual PM2.5 iSIP submission
(February 8, 2016). All other iSIP requirements applicable to these
Kentucky infrastructure SIP submissions have been or will be addressed
in separate rulemakings.

IV. Statutory and Executive Order Reviews

A. Executive Order 12866: Regulatory Planning and Review and Executive
Order 13563: Improving Regulation and Regulatory Review

    This action is not a significant regulatory action and was
therefore not submitted to the Office of Management and Budget (OMB)
for review.

B. Executive Order 13771: Reducing Regulations and Controlling
Regulatory Costs

    This action is not an Executive Order 13771 regulatory action
because this action is not significant under Executive Order 12866.

C. Paperwork Reduction Act

    This action does not impose an information collection burden under
the provisions of the Paperwork Reduction Act, because it does not
contain any information collection activities.

D. Regulatory Flexibility Act (RFA)

    I certify that this action will not have a significant economic
impact on a substantial number of small entities under the RFA. This
action will not impose any requirements on small entities.

E. Unfunded Mandates Reform Act (UMRA)

    This action does not contain any unfunded mandates as described in
UMRA, 2 U.S.C. 1531-1538, and does not significantly or uniquely affect
small governments. This action imposes no enforceable duty on any
state, local or tribal governments or the private sector.

F. Executive Order 13132: Federalism

    This action does not have federalism implications. It will not have
substantial direct effects on the states, on the relationship between
the national government and the states, or on the distribution of power
and responsibilities among the various levels of government.

G. Executive Order 13175: Consultation and Coordination With Indian
Tribal Governments

    This action does not have tribal implications, as specified in
Executive Order 13175, in Kentucky. It will not have substantial direct
effects on tribal governments. EPA has determined that this action does
not have substantial direct effects on tribal governments because, as
it relates to prong 4, this action is not approving any specific rule,
but rather determining that the approved SIP for Kentucky meets certain
CAA requirements. As it relates to the regional haze SIP, replacing
reliance on CAIR with reliance on CSAPR has no substantial direct
effects because the reliance on CSAPR for regional haze purposes in
Kentucky already existed through a FIP. EPA notes that this action will
not impose substantial direct costs on Tribal governments or preempt
Tribal law.

H. Executive Order 13045: Protection of Children From Environmental
Health Risks and Safety Risks

    EPA interprets Executive Order 13045 as applying only to those
regulatory actions that concern environmental health or safety risks
that EPA has reason to believe may disproportionately affect children,
per the definition of ``covered regulatory action'' in section 2-202 of
the Executive Order. This action is not subject to Executive Order
13045 because it does not concern an environmental health risk or
safety risk.

I. Executive Order 13211: Actions Concerning Regulations That
Significantly Affect Energy Supply, Distribution, or Use

    This action is not subject to Executive Order 13211, because it is
not a significant regulatory action under Executive Order 12866.

J. National Technology Transfer and Advancement Act

    This rulemaking does not involve technical standards.

K. Executive Order 12898: Federal Actions To Address Environmental
Justice in Minority Populations and Low-Income Populations

    EPA believes that this action does not have disproportionately high
and adverse human health or environmental effects on minority
populations, low-income populations, and/or indigenous peoples, as
specified in Executive Order 12898 (59 FR 7629, February 16, 1994).

L. Congressional Review Act (CRA)

    This action is subject to the CRA, and EPA will submit a rule
report to each House of the Congress and to the Comptroller General of
the United States. This action is not a ``major rule'' as defined by 5
U.S.C. 804(2).

M. Judicial Review

    Under section 307(b)(1) of the CAA, petitions for judicial review
of this action must be filed in the United States Court of Appeals for
the appropriate circuit by June 7, 2019. Filing a petition for
reconsideration by the Administrator of this final rules does not
affect the finality of this action for the purposes of judicial review
nor does it extend the time within which a petition for judicial review
may be filed, and shall not postpone the effectiveness of such rule or
action. This action may not be challenged later in proceedings to
enforce its requirements. See CAA section 307(b)(2).

List of Subjects in 40 CFR Part 52

    Environmental protection, Administrative practice and procedure,
Air pollution control, Incorporation by reference, Intergovernmental
relations, Nitrogen dioxide, Ozone, Particulate Matter, Reporting and
recordkeeping requirements, Sulfur oxides.

    Dated: March 29, 2019.
Andrew R. Wheeler,
EPA Administrator.

    40 CFR part 52 is amended as follows:

PART 52--APPROVAL AND PROMULGATION OF IMPLEMENTATION PLANS

0
1. The authority citation for part 52 continues to read as follows:

    Authority: 42 U.S.C. 7401 et seq.

Subpart S--Kentucky

0
2. Section 52.920(e), is amended by adding new entries for ``110(a)(1)
and (2) Infrastructure Requirements for the 1997 8-hour Ozone NAAQS'',
``110(a)(1) and (2) Infrastructure Requirements for the 2010 1-hour
NO2 NAAQS'', ``110(a)(1) and (2) Infrastructure

Requirements for the 2010 1-hour SO2 NAAQS'', ``110(a)(1)
and (2) Infrastructure Requirements for the 2012 Annual
PM2.5 NAAQS'' and ``Regional Haze Plan Revision'' at the end
of the table to read as follows:

Sec.  52.920   Identification of plan.

* * * * *
    (e) * * *

                                 EPA-Approved Kentucky Non-Regulatory Provisions
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
                                     Applicable      State submittal
   Name of non-regulatory SIP       geographic or     date/effective   EPA approval date       Explanations
           provision             nonattainment area        date
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

                                                  * * * * * * *
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
110(a)(1) and (2)                Kentucky..........       12/13/2007  4/8/2019, [Insert   Addressing prong 4 of
 Infrastructure Requirements                                           citation of         section
 for the 1997 8-hour Ozone                                             publication].       110(a)(2)(D)(i)(II)
 NAAQS.                                                                                only.
110(a)(1) and (2)                Kentucky..........        4/26/2013  4/8/2019, [Insert   Addressing prong 4 of
 Infrastructure Requirements                                           citation of         section
 for the 2010 1-hour NO2 NAAQS.                                        publication].       110(a)(2)(D)(i)(II)
                                                                                only.
110(a)(1) and (2)                Kentucky..........        4/26/2013  4/8/2019, [Insert   Addressing prong 4 of
 Infrastructure Requirements                                           citation of         section
 for the 2010 1-hour SO2 NAAQS.                                        publication].       110(a)(2)(D)(i)(II)
                                                                                only.
110(a)(1) and (2)                Kentucky..........         2/8/2016  4/8/2019, [Insert   Addressing prong 4 of
 Infrastructure Requirements                                           citation of         section
 for the 2012 Annual PM2.5                                             publication].       110(a)(2)(D)(i)(II)
 NAAQS.                                                                                only.
Regional Haze Plan Revision....  Kentucky..........       11/16/2018  4/8/2019, [Insert
                                                                       citation of
                                                                       publication].
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Sec.  52.936  [Reserved]

0
3. Section 52.936 is removed and reserved.

[FR Doc. 2019-06740 Filed 4-5-19; 8:45 am]
 BILLING CODE 6560-50-P