[Federal Register Volume 83, Number 228 (Tuesday, November 27, 2018)]
[Notices]
[Pages 60841-60842]
[FR Doc No: 2018-25806]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission

[Docket No. CP19-13-000]

Algonquin Gas Transmission, LLC; Notice of Application

    Take notice that on November 5, 2018, Algonquin Gas Transmission,
LLC (Algonquin), 5400 Westheimer Court, Houston, Texas 77056, filed an
application pursuant to section 7(b) and 7(c) of the Natural Gas Act
(NGA) and the Commission's regulations seeking authorization to replace
its existing Yorktown metering and regulation (M&R) station located in
Westchester County, New York, with upgraded facilities for additional
operation flexibility and reliability on its system. Algonquin states
the project will be fully reimbursed by Consolidated Edison Company of
New York, Inc., all as more fully described in the application which is
on file with the Commission and open to public inspection. The filing
may also be viewed on the web at http://www.ferc.gov using the
``eLibrary'' link. Enter the docket number excluding the last three
digits in the docket number field to access the document. For
assistance, contact FERC at [email protected] or call toll-
free,<PHONE_NUMBER> or TTY,<PHONE_NUMBER>.
    Any questions regarding this application should be directed to Lisa
A. Connolly, Director, Rates and Certificates, Algonquin Gas
Transmission, LLC, P.O. Box 1642, Houston, Texas 77251, by telephone at
(713) 627-4102, by fax at<PHONE_NUMBER>, or by email at
[email protected].
    Specifically, Algonquin states that the proposed construction will
include the (i) installation and subsequent removal of temporary bypass
facilities, (ii) removal and replacement of the station building and
housed facilities including two ultrasonic meters, one low flow meter,
a flow control valve, and regulation facilities, (iii) replacement of
the existing gas-fired heater. The proposed project will increase
capacity on Algonquin's system to 31,200 Dekatherms per day. Algonquin
states the replacement and upgrade of the metering facilities is
anticipated to begin in the spring of 2020, with the completion of the
meter replacement and facility upgrade by the fall of 2020.
    Pursuant to section 157.9 of the Commission's rules, 18 CFR 157.9,
within 90 days of this Notice the Commission staff will either:
Complete its environmental assessment (EA) and place it into the
Commission's public record (eLibrary) for this proceeding; or issue a
Notice of Schedule for Environmental Review. If a Notice of Schedule
for Environmental Review is issued, it will indicate, among other
milestones, the anticipated date for the Commission staff's issuance of
the EA for this proposal. The filing of the EA in the Commission's
public record for this proceeding or the issuance of a Notice of
Schedule for Environmental Review will serve to notify federal and
state agencies of the timing for the completion of all necessary
reviews, and the subsequent need to complete all federal authorizations
within 90 days of the date of issuance of the Commission staff's EA.
    There are two ways to become involved in the Commission's review of
this project. First, any person wishing to obtain legal status by
becoming a party to the proceedings for this project should, on or
before the comment date stated below file with the Federal Energy
Regulatory Commission, 888 First Street NE, Washington, DC 20426, a
motion to intervene in accordance with the requirements of the
Commission's Rules of Practice and Procedure (18 CFR 385.214 or
385.211) and the Regulations under the NGA (18 CFR 157.10). A person
obtaining party status will be placed on the service list maintained by
the Secretary of the Commission and will receive copies of all
documents filed by the applicant and by all other parties. A party must
submit 3 copies of filings made in the proceeding with the Commission
and must provide a copy to the applicant and to every other party. Only
parties to the proceeding can ask for court review of Commission orders
in the proceeding.
    However, a person does not have to intervene in order to have
comments considered. The second way to participate is by filing with
the Secretary of the Commission, as soon as possible, an original and
two copies of comments in support of or in opposition to this project.
The Commission will consider these comments in determining the
appropriate action to be taken, but the filing of a comment alone will
not serve to make the filer a party to the proceeding. The Commission's
rules require that persons filing comments in opposition to the project
provide copies of their protests only to the party or parties directly
involved in the protest.
    Persons who wish to comment only on the environmental review of
this project should submit an original and two copies of their comments
to the Secretary of the Commission. Environmental commentors will be
placed on the Commission's environmental mailing list and will be
notified of any meetings associated with the Commission's environmental
review process. Environmental commentors will not be required to serve
copies of filed documents on all other parties. However, the non-party
commentors will not receive copies of all documents filed by other
parties or issued by the Commission and will not have the right to seek
court review of the Commission's final order.
    As of the February 27, 2018 date of the Commission's order in
Docket No. CP16-4-001, the Commission will apply its revised practice
concerning out-of-time motions to intervene in any new Natural Gas Act
section 3 or section 7 proceeding.\1\ Persons desiring to become a
party to a certificate proceeding are to intervene in a timely manner.
If seeking to intervene out-of-time, the movant is required to ``show
good cause why the time limitation should be waived,'' and should
provide justification by reference to factors set forth in Rule
214(d)(1) (18 CFR 385.214(d)(1)) of the Commission's Rules and
Regulations.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \1\ Tennessee Gas Pipeline Company, L.L.C., 162 FERC ] 61,167 at
P 50 (2018).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    The Commission strongly encourages electronic filings of comments,
protests, and interventions in lieu of paper using the ``eFiling'' link
at http://www.ferc.gov. Persons unable to file electronically should
submit an original and 3 copies of the protest or intervention to the
Federal Energy Regulatory Commission, 888 First Street NE, Washington,
DC 20426.
    Comment Date: 5:00 p.m. Eastern time on December 11, 2018.

    Dated: November 20, 2018.
Kimberly D. Bose,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2018-25806 Filed 11-26-18; 8:45 am]
 BILLING CODE 6717-01-P


[Federal Register Volume 85, Number 25 (Thursday, February 6, 2020)]
[Notices]
[Page 6965]
[FR Doc No: 2020-02298]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY

Federal Emergency Management Agency

[Docket ID FEMA-2020-0001]

Notice of Adjustment of Statewide per Capita Indicator for
Recommending a Cost Share Adjustment

AGENCY: Federal Emergency Management Agency, DHS.

ACTION: Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: FEMA gives notice that the statewide per capita indicator for
recommending cost share adjustments for major disasters declared on or
after January 1, 2020, through December 31, 2020 is $149.

DATES: This notice applies to major disasters declared on or after
January 1, 2020.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Tod Wells, Recovery Directorate,
Federal Emergency Management Agency, 500 C Street SW, Washington, DC
20472,<PHONE_NUMBER>.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Pursuant to 44 CFR 206.47, the statewide per
capita indicator that is used to recommend an increase of the Federal
cost share from seventy-five percent (75%) to not more than ninety
percent (90%) of the eligible cost of permanent work under section 406
and emergency work under section 403 and section 407 of the Robert T.
Stafford Disaster Relief and Emergency Assistance Act is adjusted
annually. The adjustment to the indicator is based on the Consumer
Price Index for All Urban Consumers published annually by the U.S.
Department of Labor. For disasters declared on January 1, 2020, through
December 31, 2020, the qualifying indicator is $149 per capita of state
or tribal population.
    This adjustment is based on an increase of 2.3 percent in the
Consumer Price Index for All Urban Consumers for the 12-month period
that ended December 2019. The Bureau of Labor Statistics of the U.S.
Department of Labor released the information on January 14, 2020.

The following Catalog of Federal Domestic Assistance Numbers (CFDA)
are to be used for reporting and drawing funds: 97.030, Community
Disaster Loans; 97.031, Cora Brown Fund; 97.032, Crisis Counseling;
97.033, Disaster Legal Services; 97.034, Disaster Unemployment
Assistance (DUA); 97.046, Fire Management Assistance Grant; 97.048,
Disaster Housing Assistance to Individuals and Households In
Presidentially Declared Disaster Areas; 97.049, Presidentially
Declared Disaster Assistance--Disaster Housing Operations for
Individuals and Households; 97.050, Presidentially Declared Disaster
Assistance to Individuals and Households--Other Needs; 97.036,
Disaster Grants--Public Assistance (Presidentially Declared
Disasters); 97.039, Hazard Mitigation Grant.

Pete Gaynor,
Acting Administrator, Federal Emergency Management Agency.
[FR Doc. 2020-02298 Filed 2-5-20; 8:45 am]
 BILLING CODE 9111-23-P


[Federal Register: August 18, 2010 (Volume 75, Number 159)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Page 50871-50874]
[DOCID:fr18au10-13]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION

Federal Aviation Administration

14 CFR Part 39

[Docket No. FAA-2010-0041; Directorate Identifier 2009-NM-218-AD;
Amendment 39-16392; AD 2010-17-02]
RIN 2120-AA64

Airworthiness Directives; Airbus Model A330-201, -202, -203, -
223, -243, -301, -302, -303, -321, -322, -323, -341, -342, and -343
Airplanes, Model A340-211, -212, -213, -311, -312, and -313 Airplanes,
and Model A340-541 and -642 Airplanes

AGENCY: Federal Aviation Administration (FAA), Department of
Transportation (DOT).

ACTION: Final rule.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: We are adopting a new airworthiness directive (AD) for the
products listed above. This AD results from mandatory continuing
airworthiness information (MCAI) originated by an aviation authority of
another country to identify and correct an unsafe condition on an
aviation product. The MCAI describes the unsafe condition as:

    Several reports have recently been received of loose pneumatic
quick-disconnect unions on Goodrich pitot probes P/N (part number)
0851HL. These may be the result of mis-torque of the affected unions
at equipment manufacturing level. Investigations are still on-going
to determine the root cause(s).
    This condition, if not corrected, could lead to an air leak,
resulting in incorrect total pressure measurement and consequent
erroneous Calibrated Airspeed (CAS)/MACH parameters delivered by the
Air Data Computer (ADC).
* * * * *

Loss or fluctuation of indicated airspeed could result in misleading
information provided to the flightcrew. We are issuing this AD to
require actions to correct the unsafe condition on these products.

DATES: This AD becomes effective September 22, 2010.
    The Director of the Federal Register approved the incorporation by
reference of certain publications listed in this AD as of September 22,
2010.

ADDRESSES: You may examine the AD docket on the Internet at http://
www.regulations.gov or in person at the U.S. Department of
Transportation, Docket Operations, M-30, West Building Ground Floor,
Room W12-140, 1200 New Jersey Avenue, SE., Washington, DC.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Vladimir Ulyanov, Aerospace Engineer,
International Branch, ANM-116, FAA, Transport Airplane Directorate,
1601 Lind Avenue, SW., Renton, Washington 98057-3356; telephone (425)
227-1138; fax<PHONE_NUMBER>.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

Discussion

    We issued a notice of proposed rulemaking (NPRM) to amend 14 CFR
part 39 to include an AD that would apply to the specified products.
That NPRM was published in the Federal Register on January 21, 2010 (75
FR 3420). That NPRM proposed to correct an unsafe condition for the
specified products.
    Since that NPRM was issued, the European Aviation Safety Agency
(EASA), which is the aviation authority for the Member States of the
European Community, has issued EASA Airworthiness Directive 2009-
0202R1, dated April 15, 2010 (referred to after this as ``the MCAI''),
to correct an unsafe condition for the specified products. (MCAI 2009-
0202-E, dated September 21, 2009, and corrected September 22, 2009, was
referred to in the NPRM.) The

MCAI has been revised to exclude pitot probes marked with a red torque
check-indicating mark. If the red indicating mark is on the pitot
probe, it can be installed with no further action. The MCAI states:

    Several reports have recently been received of loose pneumatic
quick-disconnect unions on Goodrich pitot probes P/N (part number)
0851HL. These may be the result of mis-torque of the affected unions
at equipment manufacturing level. Investigations are still on-going
to determine the root cause(s).
    This condition, if not corrected, could lead to an air leak,
resulting in incorrect total pressure measurement and consequent
erroneous Calibrated Airspeed (CAS)/MACH parameters delivered by the
Air Data Computer (ADC).
    As a precautionary measure, this AD requires a torque check of
the pneumatic quick-disconnect union on certain Goodrich P/N 0851HL
pitot probes and corrective action, depending on findings.
* * * * *
    This AD [MCAI] is revised in order to exclude from the torque-
check required by paragraph (4) of this AD those pitot probes marked
with a red torque check-mark.

Loss or fluctuation of indicated airspeed could result in misleading
information provided to the flightcrew. If the quick-disconnect union
fitted on the pitot probe is not adequately torqued, the corrective
action includes applying torque. You may obtain further information by
examining the MCAI in the AD docket.

Revised Service Information

    Airbus has issued All Operators Telexes (AOTs) A330-34A3235 (for
Model A330-201, -202, -203, -223, -243, -301, -302, -303, -321, -322, -
323, -341, -342, and -343 airplanes); A340-34A4241 (for Model A340-211,
-212, -213, -311, -312, and -313 airplanes); and A340-34A5074 (for
Model A340-541 and -642 airplanes); all Revision 02, all dated March 1,
2010. We have revised Table 1 of this AD to add Revision 02 of the AOTs
as the appropriate source of service information for accomplishing the
specified actions. We have also added a new Table 2 to this AD to give
credit for accomplishing the actions using the previous issues of the
AOTs.

Comments

    We gave the public the opportunity to participate in developing
this AD. We considered the comments received.

Support for NPRM

    The Airline Pilots Association (ALPA) supports the intent of the
NPRM and appreciates the opportunity to comment.

Request for Credit for Actions Accomplished Previously

    Delta Airlines asks that the NPRM be revised to allow credit for
either adequate torqueing of the pneumatic quick-disconnect union of
each pitot probe for affected pitot probes, or updating the aircraft
maintenance manual (AMM) to ensure that the pneumatic quick-disconnect
union of each pitot probe is torqued properly during installation.
Delta states that Airbus AOT A330-34A3235, Revision 02, dated March 1,
2010, specifies that for pitot probes that are still held as spares
there are two choices of actions as noted above.
    Delta also asks that the NPRM be revised to give credit for pitot
probes remanufactured and returned to Delta by Goodrich on which the
proposed requirements were done before Airbus AOT A330-32A3235 dated
September 10, 2009, or Revision 1, dated September 21, 2009, were
issued. Delta notes that those pitot probes were returned with adequate
torque but do not have a torque check indicating mark (Airbus AOT A330-
32A3235, Revision 02, dated March 1, 2010, adds a torque check
indicating mark after the pitot probe is adequately torqued). Delta
states that it was proactive in correcting any deficiencies by taking
immediate corrective actions. Delta adds that an allowance for this
method of compliance should be included in the NPRM to avoid processing
an alternative method of compliance (AMOC).
    We disagree with the commenter's request to give credit for pitot
probes remanufactured by Goodrich because non-marked pitot probes may
be unintentionally installed on the airplane without performing a
proper torque check. However, under the provisions of paragraph (h) of
the final rule, we will consider requests for approval of an
alternative method of compliance for using specific pitot probes
identified by an operator if sufficient data are submitted to
substantiate that the pitot probes would provide an acceptable level of
safety.
    Regarding Delta's comment on spare parts, we have revised paragraph
(g)(4) of this AD to give credit for installing parts that have the
torque check indicating mark.

Conclusion

    We reviewed the available data, including the comments received,
and determined that air safety and the public interest require adopting
the AD with the changes described previously. We determined that these
changes will not increase the economic burden on any operator or
increase the scope of the AD.

Differences Between This AD and the MCAI or Service Information

    We have reviewed the MCAI and related service information and, in
general, agree with their substance. But we might have found it
necessary to use different words from those in the MCAI to ensure the
AD is clear for U.S. operators and is enforceable. In making these
changes, we do not intend to differ substantively from the information
provided in the MCAI and related service information.
    We might also have required different actions in this AD from those
in the MCAI in order to follow our FAA policies. Any such differences
are highlighted in a NOTE within the AD.

Explanation of Change to Costs of Compliance

    Since issuance of the NPRM, we have increased the labor rate used
in the Costs of Compliance from $80 per work-hour to $85 per work-hour.
The Costs of Compliance information, below, reflects this increase in
the specified hourly labor rate.

Costs of Compliance

    We estimate that this AD will affect 47 products of U.S. registry.
We also estimate that it will take about 1 work-hour per product to
comply with the basic requirements of this AD. The average labor rate
is $85 per work-hour. Based on these figures, we estimate the cost of
the AD on U.S. operators to be $3,995, or $85 per product.

Authority for This Rulemaking

    Title 49 of the United States Code specifies the FAA's authority to
issue rules on aviation safety. Subtitle I, section 106, describes the
authority of the FAA Administrator. ``Subtitle VII: Aviation
Programs,'' describes in more detail the scope of the Agency's
authority.
    We are issuing this rulemaking under the authority described in
``Subtitle VII, Part A, Subpart III, Section 44701: General
requirements.'' Under that section, Congress charges the FAA with
promoting safe flight of civil aircraft in air commerce by prescribing
regulations for practices, methods, and procedures the Administrator
finds necessary for safety in air commerce. This regulation is within
the scope of that authority because it addresses an unsafe condition
that is likely to exist or develop on products identified in this
rulemaking action.

Regulatory Findings

    We determined that this AD will not have federalism implications
under Executive Order 13132. This AD will not have a substantial direct
effect on the States, on the relationship between the national
government and the States, or on the distribution of power and
responsibilities among the various levels of government.
    For the reasons discussed above, I certify this AD:
    1. Is not a ``significant regulatory action'' under Executive Order
12866;
    2. Is not a ``significant rule'' under the DOT Regulatory Policies
and Procedures (44 FR 11034, February 26, 1979); and
    3. Will not have a significant economic impact, positive or
negative, on a substantial number of small entities under the criteria
of the Regulatory Flexibility Act.
    We prepared a regulatory evaluation of the estimated costs to
comply with this AD and placed it in the AD docket.

Examining the AD Docket

    You may examine the AD docket on the Internet at http://
www.regulations.gov; or in person at the Docket Operations office
between 9 a.m. and 5 p.m., Monday through Friday, except Federal
holidays. The AD docket contains the NPRM, the regulatory evaluation,
any comments received, and other information. The street address for
the Docket Operations office (telephone<PHONE_NUMBER>) is in the
ADDRESSES section. Comments will be available in the AD docket shortly
after receipt.

List of Subjects in 14 CFR Part 39

    Air transportation, Aircraft, Aviation safety, Incorporation by
reference, Safety.

Adoption of the Amendment

0
Accordingly, under the authority delegated to me by the Administrator,
the FAA amends 14 CFR part 39 as follows:

PART 39--AIRWORTHINESS DIRECTIVES

0
1. The authority citation for part 39 continues to read as follows:

    Authority:  49 U.S.C. 106(g), 40113, 44701.

Sec.  39.13  [Amended]

0
2. The FAA amends Sec.  39.13 by adding the following new AD:

2010-17-02 Airbus: Amendment 39-16392. Docket No. FAA-2010-0041;
Directorate Identifier 2009-NM-218-AD.

Effective Date

    (a) This airworthiness directive (AD) becomes effective
September 22, 2010.

Affected ADs

    (b) None.

Applicability

    (c) This AD applies to the Airbus airplanes identified in
paragraphs (c)(1), (c)(2), and (c)(3) of this AD; certificated in
any category; all manufacturer serial numbers; with pitot probes
having Goodrich part number (P/N) 0851HL, serial numbers 267328
through 270714 inclusive.
    (1) Model A330-201, -202, -203, -223, -243, -301, -302, -303, -
321, -322, -323, -341, -342, and -343 airplanes.
    (2) Model A340-211, -212, -213, -311, -312, and -313 airplanes.
    (3) Model A340-541 and -642 airplanes.

Subject

    (d) Air Transport Association (ATA) of America Code 34:
Navigation.

Reason

    (e) The mandatory continued airworthiness information (MCAI)
states:

    Several reports have recently been received of loose pneumatic
quick-disconnect unions on Goodrich pitot probes P/N (part number)
0851HL. These may be the result of mis-torque of the affected unions
at equipment manufacturing level. Investigations are still on-going
to determine the root cause(s).
    This condition, if not corrected, could lead to an air leak,
resulting in incorrect total pressure measurement and consequent
erroneous Calibrated Airspeed (CAS)/MACH parameters delivered by the
Air Data Computer (ADC).
    As a precautionary measure, this AD requires a torque check of
the pneumatic quick-disconnect union on certain Goodrich P/N 0851HL
pitot probes and corrective action, depending on findings.
* * * * *
    This AD [MCAI] is revised in order to exclude from the torque-
check required by paragraph (4) of this AD those pitot probes marked
with a red torque check-mark.

Loss or fluctuation of indicated airspeed could result in misleading
information provided to the flightcrew. If the quick-disconnect
union fitted on the pitot probe is not adequately torqued, the
corrective action includes applying torque.

Compliance

    (f) You are responsible for having the actions required by this
AD performed within the compliance times specified, unless the
actions have already been done.

Actions

    (g) At the time specified, do the following actions.
    (1) Within 14 days after the effective date of this AD: Perform
a torque check of the pneumatic quick-disconnect union of each pitot
probe having Goodrich P/N 0851HL, serial numbers 267328 through
270714 inclusive, to determine if the torque is adequate, in
accordance with the instructions of the applicable service
information specified in Table 1 of this AD. Before further flight,
do all applicable corrective actions in accordance with the
instructions of the applicable service information specified in
Table 1 of this AD.

                   Table 1--Airbus Service Information
------------------------------------------------------------------------
 Airbus all operators telex--       Revision--            Dated--
------------------------------------------------------------------------
A330-34A3235 (for Model A330-   02...............  March 1, 2010.
 201, -202, -203, -223, -243, -
 301, -302, -303, -321, -322, -
 323, -341, -342, and -343
 airplanes).
A340[dash]34A4241 (for Model    02...............  March 1, 2010.
 A340-211, -212, -213, -311, -
 312, and -313 airplanes).
A340-34A5074 (for Model A340-   02...............  March 1, 2010.
 541 and -642 airplanes).
------------------------------------------------------------------------

     (2) Within 30 days after performing the torque check required
by paragraph (g)(1) of this AD, or within 30 days after the
effective date of this AD, whichever occurs later: Report the torque
check results to Airbus, including no findings, as specified in the
instructions of the applicable service information listed in Table 1
of this AD.
    (3) Actions done before the effective date of this AD, in
accordance with the applicable service information listed in Table 2
of this AD, are acceptable for compliance with the corresponding
requirements in paragraph (g)(1) of this AD.

                                   Table 2--Airbus Credit Service Information
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
       Airbus all operators telex--                  Revision--                           Dated--
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
A330-34A3235.............................  Original.....................  September 10, 2009.
A330-34A3235.............................  1............................  September 21, 2009.

A340-34A4241.............................  Original.....................  September 10, 2009.
A340-34A4241.............................  1............................  September 21, 2009.
A340-34A5074.............................  Original.....................  September 10, 2009.
A340-34A5074.............................  1............................  September 21, 2009.
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

     (4) As of the effective date of this AD, no person may install
a pitot probe having Goodrich P/N 0851HL, serial numbers 267328
through 270714 inclusive, on any airplane, unless the actions
required by paragraph (g)(1) of this AD have been done; or an intact
red torque check mark is visible on the interface of the pnuematic
quick disconnect union and the union mount.

FAA AD Differences

    Note 1: This AD differs from the MCAI and/or service information
as follows:
    Where the MCAI includes a compliance time of ``5 days,'' we have
determined that a compliance time of ``within 14 days after the
effective date of the AD'' is appropriate. The manufacturer and EASA
agree with this expansion in compliance time.

Other FAA AD Provisions

    (h) The following provisions also apply to this AD:
    (1) Alternative Methods of Compliance (AMOCs): The Manager,
International Branch, ANM-116, FAA, Transport Airplane Directorate,
has the authority to approve AMOCs for this AD, if requested using
the procedures found in 14 CFR 39.19. Send information to ATTN:
Vladimir Ulyanov, Aerospace Engineer, International Branch, ANM-116,
FAA, Transport Airplane Directorate, 1601 Lind Avenue, SW., Renton,
Washington 98057-3356; telephone<PHONE_NUMBER>; fax<PHONE_NUMBER>.
Before using any approved AMOC on any airplane to which the AMOC
applies, notify your principal maintenance inspector (PMI) or
principal avionics inspector (PAI), as appropriate, or lacking a
principal inspector, your local Flight Standards District Office.
The AMOC approval letter must specifically reference this AD.
    (2) Airworthy Product: For any requirement in this AD to obtain
corrective actions from a manufacturer or other source, use these
actions if they are FAA-approved. Corrective actions are considered
FAA-approved if they are approved by the State of Design Authority
(or their delegated agent). You are required to assure the product
is airworthy before it is returned to service.
    (3) Reporting Requirements: For any reporting requirement in
this AD, under the provisions of the Paperwork Reduction Act (44
U.S.C. 3501 et seq.), the Office of Management and Budget (OMB) has
approved the information collection requirements and has assigned
OMB Control Number 2120-0056.

Related Information

    (i) Refer to MCAI Airworthiness Directive 2009-0202R1, dated
April 15, 2010; and the service information specified in Table 1 of
this AD; for related information.

Material Incorporated by Reference

    (j) You must use the service information contained in Table 3 of
this AD, as applicable, to do the actions required by this AD,
unless the AD specifies otherwise. (The document number, revision
level, and date of these documents are listed only on the first page
of these documents; no other page of these documents contains this
information.)

               Table 3--Material Incorporated by Reference
------------------------------------------------------------------------
 Airbus all operators telex--       Revision--            Dated--
------------------------------------------------------------------------
A330-34A3235..................  02...............  March 1, 2010.
A340-34A4241..................  02...............  March 1, 2010.
A340-34A5074..................  02...............  March 1, 2010.
------------------------------------------------------------------------

     (1) The Director of the Federal Register approved the
incorporation by reference of this service information under 5
U.S.C. 552(a) and 1 CFR part 51.
    (2) For service information identified in this AD, contact
Airbus SAS--Airworthiness Office--EAL, 1 Rond Point Maurice
Bellonte, 31707 Blagnac Cedex, France; telephone +33 5 61 93 36 96;
fax +33 5 61 93 45 80; e-mail<EMAIL_ADDRESS>
Internet http://www.airbus.com.
    (3) You may review copies of the service information at the FAA,
Transport Airplane Directorate, 1601 Lind Avenue, SW., Renton,
Washington. For information on the availability of this material at
the FAA, call<PHONE_NUMBER>.
    (4) You may also review copies of the service information that
is incorporated by reference at the National Archives and Records
Administration (NARA). For information on the availability of this
material at NARA, call<PHONE_NUMBER>, or go to: http://
www.archives.gov/federal_register/code_of_federal_regulations/
ibr_locations.html.

    Issued in Renton, Washington, on July 30, 2010.
Ali Bahrami,
Manager, Transport Airplane Directorate, Aircraft Certification
Service.
[FR Doc. 2010-19701 Filed 8-17-10; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910-13-P