[Federal Register: August 2, 2007 (Volume 72, Number 148)]
[Notices]
[Page 42456-42457]
[DOCID:fr02au07-141]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

[Release No. 34-56162; File No. SR-NYSE-2007-013]

Self-Regulatory Organizations; New York Stock Exchange LLC,
Notice of Filing of Proposed Rule and Amendment No. 1 Relating to a
Proposed New Rule on Notification of Fees

July 27, 2007.
    Pursuant to section 19(b)(1) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934
(the ``Act''),\1\ and Rule 19b-4 thereunder,\2\ notice is hereby given
that on February 6, 2007, the New York Stock Exchange (``NYSE'') filed
with the Securities and Exchange Commission (``Commission'') the
proposed new rule as described in Items I, II and III below, which
Items have been substantially prepared by NYSE. On July 27, 2007, NYSE
filed Amendment No. 1 to the proposed rule. The Commission is
publishing this notice to solicit comments on the proposed rule from
interested persons.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \1\ 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(1).
    \2\ 17 CFR 240.19b-4.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

I. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement of the Terms of Substance
of the Proposed Rule

    NYSE is filing with the Commission proposed new Rule 405B
(``Notification of Fees'').

II. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement of the Purpose of, and
Statutory Basis for, the Proposed Rule

    In its filing with the Commission, the Exchange included statements
concerning the purpose of, and basis for, the proposed rule change. The
text of these statements may be examined at the places specified in
Item IV below. The Exchange has prepared summaries, set forth in
sections A, B, and C below, of the most significant aspects of such
statements.

A. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement of the Purpose of, and
Statutory Basis for, the Proposed Rule

1. Purpose
    The NYSE is proposing new Rule 405B (``Notification of Fees'')
which would require member organizations to provide their customers
with written notification of all fees related to their customers'
accounts as well as require that fees be reasonable and not unfairly
discriminatory between customers.
a. Background
    A significant number of operational complaints that were reported
to the Exchange pursuant to NYSE Rule 351(d) \3\ concerned member
organizations' insufficient notification of fees to their customers.\4\
Specifically, many of these complaints involved increases in account
fees and service charges or other charges which customers felt were
imposed on them without notification. In June of 2005, the Exchange
published Information Memo 05-41 (``Customer Notification of Service
Fees and Service Fee Changes''), which provided guidance to firms
regarding notification of fees. New Rule 405B is proposed to codify
such guidance so as to emphasize the importance of notification of fees
to customers.\5\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \3\ NYSE Rule 351 (``Reporting Requirements'') specifies certain
occurrences, incidents, and periodic information that member
organizations must report to the Exchange.
    \4\ See NYSE Information Memo 05-41 (June 13, 2005) (Customer
Notification of Service Fees and Service Fee Changes) stating that
over 25% of customer operational complaints made to the Exchange in
2004 concerned ``fee/commissions'' problems.
    \5\ There has continued to be abuses in this area of excessive
fees charged to customers and fee notification to customers. See
NASD action involving McLaughlin, Piven and Vogel Securities
(October 26, 2006).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

b. Proposed Rule
    As proposed, Rule 405B would require member organizations to
provide their customers with written notification of relevant fees
regarding their accounts. Specifically, Rule 405B(1)(a) would require
member organizations to provide each of its customers with written
notification of all fees that are in effect at the time the account is
opened, or that will take effect within 30 days of the account being
opened. Additionally, Rule 405B(1)(b) would require member
organizations to mail written notification of increased fees, or
imposition of any new fees, at least 30 days prior to the increase or
imposition related to an account to the last known address of every
customer whose account is subject to such fees. Further, member
organizations would be required to post a notification of the types of
fee changes, and the projected date of such changes, on their internet
website (if they maintain a website). This proposed Rule would better
allow customers to stay apprised of their account fees as well as any
changes to such fees.
    Proposed Rule 405B(2) provides for methods of notification.
Specifically, the proposed new rule would allow member organizations to
either send a separate written notification to inform customers of fees
or include the fee notices with account statements or newsletters.
    Furthermore, Rule 405B(3) describes the types of fees which are
included under the notification requirements of Rule 405B.
Specifically, proposed Rule 405B(3) states, in part, that fees ``shall
be construed broadly to include, but not be limited to, charges such as
commissions, charges for any managed or non-managed accounts, or
charges for other account-related services, such as reinvestment of
dividends or interest, transfer or custody of securities, appraisals,
safe-keeping, or margin.''
    Also, proposed Rule 405B(4) would require that fees imposed on
customers by member organizations be reasonable and not unfairly
discriminatory.\6\ The Exchange recognizes that fees charged to certain
customers by member organizations may differ in some circumstances
depending on various factors including, for example, the type of
account, the amount invested, and the length and type of relationship.
Thus, the proposed rule would not prohibit or restrict firms' ability
to structure their pricing schedules based upon the uniqueness of their
various customer relationships.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \6\ This is substantially similar to NASD Rule 2430 (``Charges
for Services Performed''), but proposed NYSE Rule 405B contains
notification requirements, whereas NASD Rule 2430 does not.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    In addition, proposed Rule 405B(5) would provide customers with an
option to receive notification of fees electronically in lieu of by
mail, provided the customer affirmatively opts out of receiving such
notification in writing.\7\ This proposed rule is an effort to provide
greater convenience to the investing public by providing customers with
an option as to how they would like to receive fee notifications.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \7\ This approach is similar to a recently approved amendment to
NYSE Rule 409 (``Statements of Accounts to Customers'') permitting
institutional customers doing business solely on a deliver versus
payment/receive versus payment basis (``RVP/DVP'') to opt out of
receiving statements as otherwise required by the rule. See Release
No. 34-54810 (November 22, 2006), 71 FR 69165 (November 29, 2006)
(SR-NYSE-2005-90). The SEC also approved similar revisions to NASD
Rule 2340 in Release No. 34-54811 (November 22, 2006), 71 FR 69161
(November 29, 2006) (SR-NASD-2006-066). See also NYSE Information
Memo 06-80 (November 30, 2006).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

2. Statutory Basis
    The statutory basis for this proposed rule change is section
6(b)(5) of the Exchange Act.\8\ Under that section, rules of the
Exchange must be designed to prevent fraudulent and manipulative acts
and practices and promote just and equitable principles of trade.
Proposed new Rule 405B would require member

organizations to provide their customers with written notification of
fees. This proposed new rule is, therefore, consistent with section
6(b)(5) of the Exchange Act because it would provide for greater
transparency to customers with respect to fees charged and will provide
guidance to firms with respect to the fees they impose upon their
customers.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \8\ 15 U.S.C. 78a et. seq.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

B. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement on Burden on Competition

    The Exchange believes that the proposed rule change does not impose
any burden on competition not necessary or appropriate in furtherance
of the purposes of the Exchange Act.

C. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement on Comments on the Proposed
Rule Received from Members, Participants or Others

    Written comments were neither solicited nor received.

III. Date of Effectiveness of the Proposed Rule and Timing for
Commission Action

    Within 35 days of the date of publication of this notice in the
Federal Register or within such longer period (i) as the Commission may
designate up to 90 days of such date if it finds such longer period to
be appropriate and publishes its reasons for so finding or (ii) as to
which the self-regulatory organization consents, the Commission will:
    A. By order approve such proposed rule, or
    B. institute proceedings to determine whether the proposed rule
should be disapproved.

IV. Solicitation of Comments

    Interested persons are invited to submit written data, views, and
arguments concerning the foregoing, including whether the proposed rule
is consistent with the Act. We invite interested persons to discuss
whether a de minimis exception to paragraph (1) would help member
organizations comply with the proposed rule and/or increase the
effectiveness of the disclosures. If a de minimis exception is
warranted, we also invite interested persons to discuss under what
circumstances a fee or fee increase should be considered ``de
minimis.'' Comments may be submitted by any of the following methods:

Electronic Comments

     Use the Commission's Internet comment form (http://www.sec.gov/rules/sro.shtml.
); or     Send an e-mail to<EMAIL_ADDRESS>Please include

File Number SR-NYSE-2007-013 on the subject line.

Paper Comments

     Send paper comments in triplicate to Nancy M. Morris,
Secretary, Securities and Exchange Commission, 100 F. Street, NE.,
Washington, DC 20549-1090.
    All submissions should refer to File Number SR-NYSE-2007-013. This
file number should be included on the subject line if e-mail is used.
To help the Commission process and review your comments more
efficiently, please use only one method. The Commission will post all
comments on the Commission's Internet Web site (http://www.sec.gov/rules/sro.shtml
). Copies of the submission, all subsequent amendments,

all written statements with respect to the proposed rule that are filed
with the Commission, and all written communications relating to the
proposed rule between the Commission and any person, other than those
that may be withheld from the public in accordance with the provisions
of 5 U.S.C. 552, will be available for inspection and copying in the
Commission's Public Reference Room, 100 F. Street, NE., Washington, DC
20549, on official business days between the hours of 10 a.m. and 3
p.m. Copies of such filing also will be available for inspection and
copying at the principal office of NYSE. All comments received will be
posted without change; the Commission does not edit personal
identifying information from submissions. You should submit only
information that you wish to make available publicly. All submissions
should refer to File Number SR-NYSE-2007-013 and should be submitted on
or before August 23, 2007.

    For the Commission, by the Division of Market Regulation,
pursuant to delegated authority.\9\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \9\ 17 CFR 200.30-3(a)(12).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

Nancy M. Morris,
Secretary.
 [FR Doc. E7-14990 Filed 8-1-07; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 8010-01-P


[Federal Register Volume 85, Number 16 (Friday, January 24, 2020)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Pages 4231-4233]
[FR Doc No: 2020-00541]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY

40 CFR Part 52

[EPA-R05-OAR-2019-0311; FRL-10004-21-Region 5]

Air Plan Approval; Illinois; Emissions Statement Rule
Certification for the 2015 Ozone Standard

AGENCY: Environmental Protection Agency (EPA).

ACTION: Direct final rule.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) is approving a State
Implementation Plan (SIP) submission from the Illinois Environmental
Protection Agency (IEPA) dated May 16, 2019. The submission provides
IEPA's certification that its existing emissions statement program,
titled ``Annual Emissions Report'', remains in effect and satisfies the
Clean Air Act (CAA) emissions statement requirement for the Illinois
portions of the Chicago, Illinois-Indiana-Wisconsin (IL-IN-WI) and St.
Louis, Missouri-Illinois (MO-IL) nonattainment areas under the 2015
ozone National Ambient Air Quality Standard (NAAQS). Under the CAA,
states' SIPs must require stationary sources in ozone nonattainment
areas classified as marginal or above to annually report emissions of
Volatile Organic Compounds (VOC) and Oxides of Nitrogen
(NOX).

DATES: This direct final rule will be effective March 24, 2020, unless
EPA receives adverse comments by February 24, 2020. If adverse comments
are received by EPA, EPA will publish a timely withdrawal of the direct
final rule in the Federal Register informing the public that the rule
will not take effect.

ADDRESSES: Submit your comments, identified by Docket ID No. EPA-R05-
OAR-2019-0311 at http://www.regulations.gov or via email to
<EMAIL_ADDRESS>For comments submitted at Regulations.gov, follow
the online instructions for submitting comments. Once submitted,
comments cannot be edited or removed from Regulations.gov. For either
manner of submission, EPA may publish any comment received to its
public docket. Do not submit electronically any information you
consider to be Confidential Business Information (CBI) or other
information whose disclosure is restricted by statute. Multimedia
submissions (audio, video, etc.) must be accompanied by a written
comment. The written comment is considered the official comment and
should include discussion of all points you wish to make. EPA will
generally not consider comments or comment contents located outside of
the primary submission (i.e. on the web, cloud, or other file sharing
system). For additional submission methods, please contact the person
identified in the For Further Information Contact section. For the full
EPA public comment policy, information about CBI or multimedia
submissions, and general guidance on making effective comments, please
visit http://www2.epa.gov/dockets/commenting-epa-dockets.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Kathleen D'Agostino, Attainment
Planning and Maintenance Section, Air Programs Branch (AR-18J),
Environmental Protection Agency, Region 5, 77 West Jackson Boulevard,
Chicago, Illinois 60604,<PHONE_NUMBER><EMAIL_ADDRESS>
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Throughout this document, whenever ``we,''
``us,'' or ``our'' is used, we mean EPA. This supplementary information
section is arranged as follows:

I. Background
II. IEPA's Emissions Statement Certification and EPA's Evaluation of
the State's Submission
III. Final Action
IV. Statutory and Executive Order Reviews

I. Background

    On October 1, 2015, EPA promulgated a revised 8-hour ozone NAAQS of
0.070 parts per million (ppm). See 80 FR 65292 (October 26, 2015).
Effective August 3, 2018, EPA designated nonattainment areas for the
2015 ozone NAAQS. See 83 FR 25776 (June 4, 2018). The Chicago, IL-IN-WI
and St. Louis, MO-IL areas were designated as marginal nonattainment
areas for the 2015 ozone NAAQS.
    Section 182(a)(3)(B) of the CAA requires states with ozone
nonattainment areas classified as marginal and above to submit
revisions to their SIPs to require the owner or operator of each
stationary source of NOX or VOC to provide the state with an
annual statement documenting the actual emissions of NOX and
VOC from their source. Under section 182(a)(3)(B)(ii), a state may
waive the emissions statement requirement for any class or category of
stationary sources which emits less than 25 tons per year of VOC or
NOX if the state, in its base year emissions inventory,
provides an inventory of emissions from such class or category of
sources. States and EPA have generally interpreted this waiver
provision to apply to sources (without specification of a specific
source class or source category) emitting less than 25 tons per year of
VOC or NOX.
    Many states, including Illinois, adopted emissions statement rules
for stationary sources in nonattainment areas under the 1-hour ozone
NAAQS, which EPA approved as part of each state's SIP. In cases where
an existing emissions statement requirement is still adequate to meet
the requirements under the 2015 ozone NAAQS, states may provide the
rationale for that determination to EPA in a written statement for
approval in the SIP to meet the requirements of section 182(a)(3)(B).
See 83 FR 62998, 63001, 63023 (December 6, 2018) and 80 FR 12264, 12291
(March 6, 2015).

II. IEPA's Emissions Statement Certification and EPA's Evaluation of
the State's Submission

    IEPA submitted a SIP revision on May 16, 2019 certifying that the
previously SIP-approved emissions statement regulations meet the
emissions statement requirement for areas

designated as nonattainment for the 2015 ozone standard pursuant to
sections 110 and 182 of the CAA. In its submission, IEPA stated that it
has information collection authority under Section 4 of the Illinois
Environmental Protection Act, and that IEPA collects NOX and
VOC emissions statements under 35 IAC Part 254, titled ``Annual
Emissions Report,'' which applies to any source located in an ozone
nonattainment area that has the potential to emit 25 tons per year or
more of VOC or NOX from all emission units during the
reporting year. IEPA further stated that these regulations also apply
to permitted smaller sources which are required to submit and certify
source-wide totals of actual emissions from all regulated air
pollutants emitted. Finally, IEPA confirmed, that in general,
facilities subject to Part 254 must submit actual emissions data for
NOX and VOC on an annual basis and must certify that the
information provided is accurate to the best of the certifier's
knowledge.
    EPA approved the ``Annual Emissions Report'' rules into the
Illinois SIP on May 15, 2002 (67 FR 34614). Based on this approval and
IEPA's certification, the regulations at 35 IAC Part 254 are sufficient
to meet the emissions statement requirements of CAA section
182(a)(3)(B) for the 2015 ozone NAAQS.

III. Final Action

    EPA is approving, as a SIP revision, IEPA's certification that
Illinois' ``Annual Emissions Report'' rules at 35 IAC Part 254 meet the
requirements of CAA section 182(a)(3)(B) under the 2015 ozone standard
for the Illinois portions of the Chicago, IL-IN-WI and St. Louis, MO-IL
ozone nonattainment areas.
    We are publishing this action without prior proposal because we
view this as a noncontroversial amendment and anticipate no adverse
comments. However, in the proposed rules section of this Federal
Register publication, we are publishing a separate document that will
serve as the proposal to approve the state plan if relevant adverse
written comments are filed. This rule will be effective March 24, 2020
without further notice unless we receive relevant adverse written
comments by February 24, 2020. If we receive such comments, we will
withdraw this action before the effective date by publishing a
subsequent document that will withdraw the final action. All public
comments received will then be addressed in a subsequent final rule
based on the proposed action. EPA will not institute a second comment
period. Any parties interested in commenting on this action should do
so at this time. Please note that, if EPA receives adverse comment on
an amendment, paragraph, or section of this rule and if that provision
may be severed from the remainder of the rule, EPA may adopt as final
those provisions of the rule that are not the subject of an adverse
comment. If we do not receive any comments, this action will be
effective March 24, 2020.

IV. Statutory and Executive Order Reviews

    Under the CAA, the Administrator is required to approve a SIP
submission that complies with the provisions of the CAA and applicable
Federal regulations. 42 U.S.C. 7410(k); 40 CFR 52.02(a). Thus, in
reviewing SIP submissions, EPA's role is to approve state choices,
provided that they meet the criteria of the CAA. Accordingly, this
action merely approves state law as meeting Federal requirements and
does not impose additional requirements beyond those imposed by state
law. For that reason, this action:
     Is not a ``significant regulatory action'' subject to
review by the Office of Management and Budget under Executive Orders
12866 (58 FR 51735, October 4, 1993) and 13563 (76 FR 3821, January 21,
2011);
     Is not expected to be an Executive Order 13771 (82 FR
9339, February 2, 2017) regulatory action because this action is not
significant under Executive Order 12866;
     Does not impose an information collection burden under the
provisions of the Paperwork Reduction Act (44 U.S.C. 3501 et seq.);
     Is certified as not having a significant economic impact
on a substantial number of small entities under the Regulatory
Flexibility Act (5 U.S.C. 601 et seq.);
     Does not contain any unfunded mandate or significantly or
uniquely affect small governments, as described in the Unfunded
Mandates Reform Act of 1995 (Pub. L. 104-4);
     Does not have federalism implications as specified in
Executive Order 13132 (64 FR 43255, August 10, 1999);
     Is not an economically significant regulatory action based
on health or safety risks subject to Executive Order 13045 (62 FR
19885, April 23, 1997);
     Is not a significant regulatory action subject to
Executive Order 13211 (66 FR 28355, May 22, 2001);
     Is not subject to requirements of Section 12(d) of the
National Technology Transfer and Advancement Act of 1995 (15 U.S.C. 272
note) because application of those requirements would be inconsistent
with the CAA; and
     Does not provide EPA with the discretionary authority to
address, as appropriate, disproportionate human health or environmental
effects, using practicable and legally permissible methods, under
Executive Order 12898 (59 FR 7629, February 16, 1994).
    In addition, the SIP is not approved to apply on any Indian
reservation land or in any other area where EPA or an Indian tribe has
demonstrated that a tribe has jurisdiction. In those areas of Indian
country, the rule does not have tribal implications and will not impose
substantial direct costs on tribal governments or preempt tribal law as
specified by Executive Order 13175 (65 FR 67249, November 9, 2000).
    The Congressional Review Act, 5 U.S.C. 801 et seq., as added by the
Small Business Regulatory Enforcement Fairness Act of 1996, generally
provides that before a rule may take effect, the agency promulgating
the rule must submit a rule report, which includes a copy of the rule,
to each House of the Congress and to the Comptroller General of the
United States. EPA will submit a report containing this action and
other required information to the U.S. Senate, the U.S. House of
Representatives, and the Comptroller General of the United States prior
to publication of the rule in the Federal Register. A major rule cannot
take effect until 60 days after it is published in the Federal
Register. This action is not a ``major rule'' as defined by 5 U.S.C.
804(2).
    Under section 307(b)(1) of the CAA, petitions for judicial review
of this action must be filed in the United States Court of Appeals for
the appropriate circuit by March 24, 2020. Filing a petition for
reconsideration by the Administrator of this final rule does not affect
the finality of this action for the purposes of judicial review nor
does it extend the time within which a petition for judicial review may
be filed, and shall not postpone the effectiveness of such rule or
action. Parties with objections to this direct final rule are
encouraged to file a comment in response to the parallel notice of
proposed rulemaking for this action published in the proposed rules
section of this issue of the Federal Register, rather than file an
immediate petition for judicial review of this direct final rule, so
that EPA can withdraw this direct final rule and address the comment in
the proposed rulemaking. This action may not be challenged later in
proceedings to enforce its requirements. (See section 307(b)(2) of the
CAA.)

List of Subjects in 40 CFR Part 52

    Environmental protection, Air pollution control, Incorporation by
reference, Intergovernmental relations, Oxides of nitrogen, Ozone,
Reporting and recordkeeping requirements, Volatile organic compounds.

    Dated: December 30, 2019.
Cheryl L Newton,
Acting Regional Administrator, Region 5.

    40 CFR part 52 is amended as follows:

PART 52--APPROVAL AND PROMULGATION OF IMPLEMENTATION PLANS

0
1. The authority citation for part 52 continues to read as follows:

    Authority: 42 U.S.C. 7401 et seq.

0
2. In Sec.  52.720, the table in paragraph (e) is amended by adding an
entry for ``Ozone (8-hour, 2015) certification of emissions statement
regulations'' following the entry for ``Ozone (8-hour, 2008)
Nonattainment New Source Review Requirements'' to read as follows:

Sec.  52.720   Identification of plan.

* * * * *
    (e) * * *

                       EPA-Approved Illinois Nonregulatory and Quasi-Regulatory Provisions
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
                                        Applicable          State
      Name of SIP provision            geographic or      submittal     EPA approval date         Comments
                                    nonattainment area       date
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

                                                  * * * * * * *
Ozone (8-hour, 2015)               Chicago and St.         5/16/2019  1/24/2020, [insert    Certification that
 certification of emissions         Louis areas.                       Federal Register      Illinois'
 statement regulations.                                                citation].            previously approved
                                                                                regulations at 35
                                                                                IAC Part 254 meet
                                                                                the emissions
                                                                                statement
                                                                                requirements for
                                                                                the 2015 ozone
                                                                                NAAQS.

                                                  * * * * * * *
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

[FR Doc. 2020-00541 Filed 1-23-20; 8:45 am]
 BILLING CODE 6560-50-P


[Federal Register Volume 77, Number 21 (Wednesday, February 1, 2012)]
[Notices]
[Page 5009]
[FR Doc No: 2012-2116]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission

[Docket No. ER12-862-000]

Power Supply Services LLC; Supplemental Notice That Initial
Market-Based Rate Filing Includes Request for Blanket Section 204
Authorization

    This is a supplemental notice in the above-referenced proceeding of
Power Supply Services LLC's application for market-based rate
authority, with an accompanying rate tariff, noting that such
application includes a request for blanket authorization, under 18 CFR
part 34, of future issuances of securities and assumptions of
liability.
    Any person desiring to intervene or to protest should file with the
Federal Energy Regulatory Commission, 888 First Street, NE.,
Washington, DC 20426, in accordance with Rules 211 and 214 of the
Commission's Rules of Practice and Procedure (18 CFR 385.211 and
385.214). Anyone filing a motion to intervene or protest must serve a
copy of that document on the Applicant.
    Notice is hereby given that the deadline for filing protests with
regard to the applicant's request for blanket authorization, under 18
CFR part 34, of future issuances of securities and assumptions of
liability, is February 14, 2012.
    The Commission encourages electronic submission of protests and
interventions in lieu of paper, using the FERC Online links at http://www.ferc.gov. To facilitate electronic service, persons with Internet
access who will eFile a document and/or be listed as a contact for an
intervenor must create and validate an eRegistration account using the
eRegistration link. Select the eFiling link to log on and submit the
intervention or protests.
    Persons unable to file electronically should submit an original and
14 copies of the intervention or protest to the Federal Energy
Regulatory Commission, 888 First Street NE., Washington, DC 20426.
    The filings in the above-referenced proceeding are accessible in
the Commission's eLibrary system by clicking on the appropriate link in
the above list. They are also available for review in the Commission's
Public Reference Room in Washington, DC. There is an eSubscription link
on the Web site that enables subscribers to receive email notification
when a document is added to a subscribed docket(s). For assistance with
any FERC Online service, please email<EMAIL_ADDRESS>or
call<PHONE_NUMBER> (toll free). For TTY, call<PHONE_NUMBER>.

    Dated: January 25, 2012.
Nathaniel J. Davis, Sr.,
Deputy Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2012-2116 Filed 1-31-12; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6717-01-P