[Federal Register Volume 80, Number 85 (Monday, May 4, 2015)]
[Notices]
[Page 25347]
[FR Doc No: 2015-10438]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

[File No. 500-1]

In the Matter of Cedar Creek Mines Ltd., General Kinetics
Incorporated, ProDigital Film Studios, Inc. (a/k/a ProDigital Film
Labs, Inc.), SendTec, Inc., and Specialized Services, Inc. (n/k/a
Exergetic Energy, Inc.); Order of Suspension of Trading

April 30, 2015.
    It appears to the Securities and Exchange Commission that there is
a lack of current and accurate information concerning the securities of
Cedar Creek Mines Ltd. because it has not filed any periodic reports
since the period ended February 28, 2011.
    It appears to the Securities and Exchange Commission that there is
a lack of current and accurate information concerning the securities of
General Kinetics Incorporated because it has not filed any periodic
reports since the period ended November 30, 2005.
    It appears to the Securities and Exchange Commission that there is
a lack of current and accurate information concerning the securities of
ProDigital Film Studios, Inc. (a/k/a ProDigital Film Labs, Inc.)
because it has not filed any periodic reports since the period ended
June 30, 2005.
    It appears to the Securities and Exchange Commission that there is
a lack of current and accurate information concerning the securities of
SendTec, Inc. because it has not filed any periodic reports since the
period ended September 30, 2008.
    It appears to the Securities and Exchange Commission that there is
a lack of current and accurate information concerning the securities of
Specialized Services, Inc. (n/k/a Exergetic Energy, Inc.) because it
has not filed any periodic reports since the period ended September 30,
2011.
    The Commission is of the opinion that the public interest and the
protection of investors require a suspension of trading in the
securities of the above-listed companies. Therefore, it is ordered,
pursuant to Section 12(k) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, that
trading in the securities of the above-listed companies is suspended
for the period from 9:30 a.m. EDT on April 30, 2015, through 11:59 p.m.
EDT on May 13, 2015.

    By the Commission.
Jill M. Peterson,
Assistant Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2015-10438 Filed 4-30-15; 11:15 am]
 BILLING CODE 8011-01-P


[Federal Register Volume 81, Number 221 (Wednesday, November 16, 2016)]
[Notices]
[Page 80656]
[FR Doc No: 2016-27453]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission

[Project No. 2334-056]

Essential Power Massachusetts, LLC; Nautilus Hydro, LLC; Notice
of Application for Transfer of License and Soliciting Comments, Motions
To Intervene, and Protests

    On October 28, 2016, Essential Power Massachusetts, LLC
(transferor) and Nautilus Hydro, LLC (transferee) filed an application
for the transfer of license of the Gardners Falls Project No. 2334. The
project is located on the Deerfield River in Franklin County,
Massachusetts. The project does not occupy Federal lands.
    The applicants seek Commission approval to transfer the license for
the Gardners Falls Project from Essential Power Massachusetts, LLC to
Nautilus Hydro, LLC.
    Applicants Contact: For transferor and transferee: Mr. David
Rosenstein, Vice President and General Counsel, Essential Power
Massachusetts, LLC, 150 College Road West, Suite 300, Princeton, NJ
08540, Phone:<PHONE_NUMBER>, Email:
<EMAIL_ADDRESS>and Ms. Julia S. Wood and Ms.
Sharon L. White, Van Ness Feldman, LLP, 1050 Thomas Jefferson Street
NW., Seventh Floor, Washington, DC 20007, Phone:<PHONE_NUMBER> and
Emails<EMAIL_ADDRESS>and<EMAIL_ADDRESS>    FERC Contact: Patricia W. Gillis,<PHONE_NUMBER>,
<EMAIL_ADDRESS>    Deadline for filing comments, motions to intervene, and protests:
30 days from the date that the Commission issues this notice. The
Commission strongly encourages electronic filing. Please file comments,
motions to intervene, and protests using the Commission's eFiling
system at http://www.ferc.gov/docs-filing/efiling.asp. Commenters can
submit brief comments up to 6,000 characters, without prior
registration, using the eComment system at http://www.ferc.gov/docs-filing/ecomment.asp. You must include your name and contact information
at the end of your comments. For assistance, please contact FERC Online
Support at<EMAIL_ADDRESS>(866) 208-3676 (toll free), or
(202) 502-8659 (TTY). In lieu of electronic filing, please send a paper
copy to: Secretary, Federal Energy Regulatory Commission, 888 First
Street NE., Washington, DC 20426. The first page of any filing should
include docket number P-2334-056.

    Dated: November 8, 2016.
Kimberly D. Bose,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2016-27453 Filed 11-15-16; 8:45 am]
 BILLING CODE 6717-01-P


[Federal Register Volume 82, Number 196 (Thursday, October 12, 2017)]
[Notices]
[Pages 47551-47553]
[FR Doc No: 2017-22030]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY

Federal Emergency Management Agency

[Docket ID FEMA-2017-0002; Internal Agency Docket No. FEMA-B-1745]

Proposed Flood Hazard Determinations

AGENCY: Federal Emergency Management Agency, DHS.

ACTION: Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: Comments are requested on proposed flood hazard
determinations, which may include additions or modifications of any
Base Flood Elevation (BFE), base flood depth, Special Flood Hazard Area
(SFHA) boundary or zone designation, or regulatory floodway on the
Flood Insurance Rate Maps (FIRMs), and where applicable, in the
supporting Flood Insurance Study (FIS) reports for the communities
listed in the table below. The purpose of this notice is to seek
general information and comment regarding the preliminary FIRM, and
where applicable, the FIS report that the Federal Emergency Management
Agency (FEMA) has provided to the affected communities. The FIRM and
FIS report are the basis of the floodplain management measures that the
community is required either to adopt or to show evidence of having in
effect in order to qualify or remain qualified for participation in the
National Flood Insurance Program (NFIP). In addition, the FIRM and FIS
report, once effective, will be used by insurance agents and others to
calculate appropriate flood insurance premium rates for new buildings
and the contents of those buildings.

DATES: Comments are to be submitted on or before January 10, 2018.

ADDRESSES: The Preliminary FIRM, and where applicable, the FIS report
for each community are available for inspection at both the online
location and the respective Community Map Repository address listed in
the tables below. Additionally, the current effective FIRM and FIS
report for each community are accessible online through the FEMA Map
Service Center at www.msc.fema.gov for comparison.
    You may submit comments, identified by Docket No. FEMA-B-1745, to
Rick Sacbibit, Chief, Engineering Services Branch, Federal Insurance
and Mitigation Administration, FEMA, 400 C Street SW., Washington, DC
20472,<PHONE_NUMBER>, or (email<EMAIL_ADDRESS>
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Rick Sacbibit, Chief, Engineering
Services Branch, Federal Insurance and Mitigation Administration, FEMA,
400 C Street SW., Washington, DC 20472,<PHONE_NUMBER>, or (email)
<EMAIL_ADDRESS>or visit the FEMA Map Information
eXchange (FMIX) online at www.floodmaps.fema.gov/fhm/fmx_main.html.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: FEMA proposes to make flood hazard
determinations for each community listed below, in accordance with
section 110 of the Flood Disaster Protection Act of 1973, 42 U.S.C.
4104, and 44 CFR 67.4(a).
    These proposed flood hazard determinations, together with the
floodplain management criteria required by 44 CFR 60.3, are the minimum
that are required. They should not be construed to mean that the
community must change any existing ordinances that are more stringent
in their floodplain management requirements. The community may at any
time enact stricter requirements of its own or pursuant to policies
established by other Federal, State, or regional entities. These flood
hazard determinations are used to meet the floodplain management
requirements of the NFIP and also are used to calculate the appropriate
flood insurance premium rates for new buildings built after the FIRM
and FIS report become effective.
    The communities affected by the flood hazard determinations are
provided in the tables below. Any request for reconsideration of the
revised flood hazard information shown on the Preliminary FIRM and FIS
report that satisfies the data requirements outlined in 44 CFR 67.6(b)
is considered an appeal. Comments unrelated to the flood hazard
determinations also will be considered before the FIRM and FIS report
become effective.
    Use of a Scientific Resolution Panel (SRP) is available to
communities in support of the appeal resolution process. SRPs are
independent panels of experts in hydrology, hydraulics, and other
pertinent sciences established to review conflicting scientific and
technical data and provide recommendations for resolution. Use of the
SRP only may be exercised after FEMA and local communities have been
engaged in a collaborative consultation process for at least 60 days
without a mutually acceptable resolution of an appeal. Additional
information regarding the SRP process can be found online at http://floodsrp.org/pdfs/srp_fact_sheet.pdf.
    The watersheds and/or communities affected are listed in the tables
below. The Preliminary FIRM, and where applicable, FIS report for each
community are available for inspection at both the online location and
the respective Community Map Repository address listed in the tables.
For communities with multiple ongoing Preliminary studies, the studies
can be identified by the unique project number and Preliminary FIRM
date listed in the tables. Additionally, the current effective FIRM and
FIS report for each community are accessible online through the FEMA
Map Service Center at www.msc.fema.gov for comparison.

(Catalog of Federal Domestic Assistance No. 97.022, ``Flood
Insurance.'')

    Dated: September 16, 2017.
Roy E. Wright,
Deputy Associate Administrator for Insurance and Mitigation, Department
of Homeland Security, Federal Emergency Management Agency.

    I. Watershed-based studies:

------------------------------------------------------------------------
                                             Community map repository
               Community                             address
------------------------------------------------------------------------
                   Middle Brazos-Palo Pinto Watershed
------------------------------------------------------------------------
      Maps Available for Inspection Online at: http://www.fema.gov/preliminaryfloodhazarddata preliminaryfloodhazarddata
------------------------------------------------------------------------
              Eastland County, Texas and Incorporated Areas
------------------------------------------------------------------------
City of Ranger.........................  City Hall, 400 West Main
                                          Street, Ranger, TX 76470.
Unincorporated Areas of Eastland County  Eastland County Judge's Office,
                                          100 West Main Street, Suite
                                          203, Eastland, TX 76448.
------------------------------------------------------------------------
               Erath County, Texas and Incorporated Areas
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Unincorporated Areas of Erath County...  Erath County Courthouse, 100
                                          West Washington Street,
                                          Stephenville, TX 76401.
------------------------------------------------------------------------
                Hood County, Texas and Incorporated Areas
------------------------------------------------------------------------
City of DeCordova......................  DeCordova Bend Estates Country
                                          Club, 5301 Country Club Drive,
                                          Granbury, TX 76049.
City of Granbury.......................  Municipal Building, 401 North
                                          Park Street, Granbury, TX
                                          76048.
Unincorporated Areas of Hood County....  Hood County Environmental
                                          Health Department, 201 West
                                          Bridge Street, Granbury, TX
                                          76048.
------------------------------------------------------------------------
              Johnson County, Texas and Incorporated Areas
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Unincorporated Areas of Johnson County.  Johnson County Public Works
                                          Department, Johnson County
                                          Annex, 2 North Mill Street,
                                          Suite 305, Cleburne, TX 76033.
------------------------------------------------------------------------

             Palo Pinto County, Texas and Incorporated Areas
------------------------------------------------------------------------
City of Graford........................  City Hall, 424 East Lee Avenue,
                                          Graford, TX 76449.
City of Mineral Wells..................  City Clerk's Office, 115
                                          Southwest 1st Street, Mineral
                                          Wells, TX 76067.
City of Mingus.........................  City Hall, 229 South Mingus
                                          Boulevard, Mingus, TX 76463.
City of Strawn.........................  City Hall, 118 East Housley
                                          Street, Strawn, TX 76475.
Town of Gordon.........................  Town Hall, 105 South Main
                                          Street, Gordon, TX 76453.
Unincorporated Areas of Palo Pinto       Palo Pinto County 911 Office,
 County.                                  520 Oak Street, Palo Pinto, TX
                                          76484.
------------------------------------------------------------------------
               Parker County, Texas and Incorporated Areas
------------------------------------------------------------------------
City of Millsap........................  City Hall, 208 Fannin Street,
                                          Millsap, TX 76066.
City of Mineral Wells..................  City Clerk's Office, 115
                                          Southwest 1st Street, Mineral
                                          Wells, TX 76067.
City of Weatherford....................  Utilities Service Center, 917
                                          Eureka Street, Weatherford, TX
                                          76086.
Town of Cool...........................  Cool Community Center, 150
                                          South Farm to Market Road 113,
                                          Millsap, TX 76066.
Unincorporated Areas of Parker County..  Parker County Permitting
                                          Department, 1114 Santa Fe
                                          Drive, Weatherford, TX 76086.
------------------------------------------------------------------------
              Stephens County, Texas and Incorporated Areas
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Unincorporated Areas of Stephens County  Stephens County Judge's Office,
                                          200 West Walker Street,
                                          Breckenridge, TX 76424.
------------------------------------------------------------------------
               Young County, Texas and Incorporated Areas
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Unincorporated Areas of Young County...  Young County 911 Director's
                                          Office, 516 4th Street, Room
                                          B5, Graham, TX 76450.
------------------------------------------------------------------------

    II. Non-watershed-based studies:

------------------------------------------------------------------------
                                             Community map repository
               Community                             address
------------------------------------------------------------------------
             Garrett County, Maryland and Incorporated Areas
------------------------------------------------------------------------
      Maps Available for Inspection Online at: http://www.fema.gov/preliminaryfloodhazarddata preliminaryfloodhazarddata
------------------------------------------------------------------------
         Project: 11-03-0525S Preliminary Date: January 6, 2017
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Unincorporated Areas of Garrett County.  Garrett County Courthouse
                                          Administrative Building,
                                          Department of Permits and
                                          Inspection Services, 203 South
                                          4th Street, Room 208, Oakland,
                                          MD 21550.
------------------------------------------------------------------------
             Wayne County, Pennsylvania (All Jurisdictions)
------------------------------------------------------------------------
      Maps Available for Inspection Online at: http://www.fema.gov/preliminaryfloodhazarddata preliminaryfloodhazarddata
------------------------------------------------------------------------
        Project: 16-03-2419S Preliminary Date: February 16, 2017
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Borough of Prompton....................  Prompton Fire Hall, 638
                                          Prompton Road, Prompton, PA
                                          18456.
Township of Canaan.....................  Canaan Township Secretary's
                                          Office, 1327 Roosevelt
                                          Highway, Waymart, PA 18472.
Township of Texas......................  Texas Township Municipal
                                          Building, 506 Willow Avenue,
                                          Honesdale, PA 18431.
------------------------------------------------------------------------
           Grant County, West Virginia and Incorporated Areas
------------------------------------------------------------------------
      Maps Available for Inspection Online at: http://www.fema.gov/preliminaryfloodhazarddata preliminaryfloodhazarddata
------------------------------------------------------------------------
         Project: 11-03-0525S Preliminary Date: January 6, 2017
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Town of Bayard.........................  Town Hall, 101 Spruce Street,
                                          Suite 1, Bayard, WV 26707.
Unincorporated Areas of Grant County...  Grant County Courthouse, 5
                                          Highland Avenue, Petersburg,
                                          WV 26847.
------------------------------------------------------------------------

[FR Doc. 2017-22030 Filed 10-11-17; 8:45 am]
 BILLING CODE 9110-12-P


[Federal Register Volume 83, Number 111 (Friday, June 8, 2018)]
[Notices]
[Pages 26726-26728]
[FR Doc No: 2018-12321]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

[Release No. 34-83369; File No. SR-GEMX-2018-18]

Self-Regulatory Organizations; Nasdaq GEMX, LLC; Notice of Filing
and Immediate Effectiveness of Proposed Rule Change To Amend and
Reorganize Chapter IV of the GEMX Schedule of Fees

June 4, 2018.
    Pursuant to Section 19(b)(1) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934
(``Act''),\1\ and Rule 19b-4 thereunder,\2\ notice is hereby given that
on May 22, 2018, Nasdaq GEMX, LLC (``GEMX'' or ``Exchange'') filed with
the Securities and Exchange Commission (``Commission'') the proposed
rule change as described in Items I and II below, which Items have been
prepared by the Exchange. The Commission is publishing this notice to
solicit comments on the proposed rule change from interested persons.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \1\ 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(1).
    \2\ 17 CFR 240.19b-4.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

I. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement of the Terms of Substance
of the Proposed Rule Change

    The Exchange proposes to amend and reorganize Chapter IV of the
GEMX Schedule of Fees.
    The text of the proposed rule change is available on the Exchange's
website at http://nasdaqgemx.cchwallstreet.com/, at the principal
office of the Exchange, and at the Commission's Public Reference Room.

II. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement of the Purpose of, and
Statutory Basis for, the Proposed Rule Change

    In its filing with the Commission, the Exchange included statements
concerning the purpose of and basis for the proposed rule change and
discussed any comments it received on the proposed rule change. The
text of these statements may be examined at the places specified in
Item IV below. The Exchange has prepared summaries, set forth in
sections A, B, and C below, of the most significant aspects of such
statements.

A. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement of the Purpose of, and
Statutory Basis for, the Proposed Rule Change

1. Purpose
    The Exchange proposes to amend Chapters IV of the GEMX Schedule of
Fees to: (i) Eliminate the Table of

Contents; (ii) relocate the Port Fees currently in Section IV, E to
Section IV, C, retitle these fees ``Ports and Other Services'' and
amend and reorganize the current port fees; and (iv) reserve Section
IV, Part E. Each change will be described in more detail below. The
Exchange believes that the proposed amendments to the Schedule of Fees
will provide more clarity as to the current fees. The Exchange notes
that no fee changes are being introduced with this rule change. The
Exchange is simply reorganizing its rules to conform to other Nasdaq
affiliate markets by aligning the location and description of its rules
on each market.
Table of Contents
    The Exchange proposes to eliminate the Table of Contents in the
GEMX Schedule of Fees. The Table Contents are unnecessary. The website
where the GEMX rules are listed \3\ contains hyperlinks and a skeleton
of the available rules within the site and enables market participants
to view all rules in that section.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \3\ GEMX rules are located at: http://nasdaqgemx.cchwallstreet.com/.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

Port Fees
    The Exchange currently lists all Port Fees within Chapter IV, Part
E. The Exchange proposes to relocate the Port Fees to Chapter VI, Part
C, which is currently reserved, and retitle those fees as ``Ports and
Other Services.'' The Exchange believes that this title more accurately
describes the types of fees contained in this chapter. The Exchange
proposes to restructure the port fees. First, the Exchange proposes to
add language at the beginning of this new chapter to state, ``The below
charges are assessed by GEMX for connectivity to GEMX.'' The Exchange
believes that this sentence makes clear that the fees apply to GEMX.
The Exchange proposes to define a port as ``a logical connection or
session that enables a market participant to send inbound messages and/
or receive outbound messages from the Exchange using various
communication protocols.'' The Exchange believes this definition will
assist members in distinguishing ports from other offerings.
    The Exchange proposes to restructure the port fees into 4
categories. The Exchange proposes to list order and quote protocols
first, order and execution offerings next, followed by data ports and
other ports as the last section. The Exchange proposes to list data
offerings that are offered at no cost. The Exchange believes that
aligning its offerings, where relevant, with other affiliated markets
\4\ will provide more transparency as to the offerings for market
participants.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \4\ The Exchange offers various services across its 6 affiliated
options markets, Nasdaq Phlx LLC, Nasdaq BX, Inc., The Nasdaq
Options Market LLC, Nasdaq GEMX, LLC, Nasdaq MRX, LLC and Nasdaq
ISE, LLC (``Nasdaq Affiliated Markets'').
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    The Exchange proposes to add a new section (i) and include the
following introductory sentence, ``The following order and quote
protocols are available on GEMX.'' The Exchange proposes to list the
order entry protocol port fees for FIX, SQF, SQF Purge Port and OTTO in
this section. The fees are not being amended, the existing fees are
being relocated into new section (i).
    The Exchange proposes to add a new section (ii) and include the
following introductory sentence, ``The following order and execution
information is available to Members.'' The Exchange intends to list
other port or interface information into this section that are
available to GEMX Members. The Exchange is relocating the CTI and FIX
DROP port fees. No changes are being made to those fees. The Exchange
also proposes to list TradeInfo GEMX Interface into this section. The
Exchange has recently filed to establish this Interface within the GEMX
rules.\5\ The Exchange proposes to note this interface is available on
GEMX at no cost.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \5\ See SR-GEMX-2018-17 (not yet published).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    The Exchange proposes to add a new section (iii) and include the
following language, ``The following data port fees apply in connection
with data subscriptions pursuant to GEMX Rules at Chapter V. These
ports are available to non-GEMX Members and GEMX Members.'' Today, GEMX
does not assess a fee for these ports outlined in new section (iii).
Similar to other Nasdaq Affiliated Markets the Exchange proposes to
list all of the ports that Members and Non-Members obtain today at no
cost. The Exchange believes that listing these ports in addition to the
data subscriptions will bring more transparency to the Schedule of
Fees.
    The Exchange proposes to add a new section (iv) entitled ``Other
ports'' and relocate the Disaster Recovery Ports into this section. The
Exchange also proposes to make clear that a Disaster Recovery Port is
available for any port listed in proposed sections (i)-(iii).
    The Exchange proposes to reserve current Chapter IV, Part E.
2. Statutory Basis
    The Exchange believes that the proposed rule change is consistent
with Section 6(b) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (the
``Act''),\6\ in general, and furthers the objectives of Section 6(b)(5)
of the Act,\7\ in particular, in that it is designed to promote just
and equitable principles of trade, to remove impediments to and perfect
the mechanism for a free and open market and a national market system,
and, in general, to protect investors and the public interest, by
providing greater transparency as to the ports offered on GEMX.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \6\ 15 U.S.C. 78f(b).
    \7\ 15 U.S.C. 78f(b)(5).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    The Exchange's proposal to remove the Table of Contents, relocate
the Port Fees, retitle and restructure those fees and reserve Chapter
IV, Part E are administrative. These changes are consistent with the
protection of investor and the public interest because the amendments
are intended to bring greater clarity to the Rulebook. The Exchange's
proposal to reorganize the port fees into sections and include pricing
for ports that are offered at no cost is also consistent with the
protection of investor and the public interest because it will bring
greater transparency to the Exchange's current offerings.

B. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement on Burden on Competition

    In accordance with Section 6(b)(8) of the Act,\8\ the Exchange does
not believe that the proposed rule change will impose any burden on
intermarket or intra-market competition that is not necessary or
appropriate in furtherance of the purposes of the Act. The Exchange's
proposal does not impose an undue burden on competition, rather the
Exchange is seeking to provide greater transparency within its rules
with respect to the various ports offered on GEMX.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \8\ 15 U.S.C. 78f(b)(8).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

C. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement on Comments on the Proposed
Rule Change Received From Members, Participants, or Others

    No written comments were either solicited or received.

III. Date of Effectiveness of the Proposed Rule Change and Timing for
Commission Action

    Because the foregoing proposed rule change does not: (i)
Significantly affect the protection of investors or the public
interest; (ii) impose any significant burden on competition; and (iii)
become operative for 30 days from the date on which it was filed, or
such shorter time as the Commission may designate, it has become
effective pursuant to Section 19(b)(3)(A)(iii) of the Act \9\ and

subparagraph (f)(6) of Rule 19b-4 thereunder.\10\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \9\ 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(3)(A)(iii).
    \10\ 17 CFR 240.19b-4(f)(6). In addition, Rule 19b-4(f)(6)
requires a self-regulatory organization to give the Commission
written notice of its intent to file the proposed rule change at
least five business days prior to the date of filing of the proposed
rule change, or such shorter time as designated by the Commission.
The Exchange has satisfied this requirement.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    A proposed rule change filed under Rule 19b-4(f)(6) \11\ normally
does not become operative prior to 30 days after the date of the
filing. However, Rule 19b-4(f)(6)(iii) \12\ permits the Commission to
designate a shorter time if such action is consistent with the
protection of investors and the public interest. The Exchange has asked
the Commission to waive the 30-day operative delay so that the proposed
rule change may become effective and operative immediately upon filing.
The Exchange states that it believes the waiver will further the
protection of investors and the public interest because it will provide
greater transparency as to various ports available to market
participants. The Exchange further states that the proposed rule change
will bring greater clarity to the Schedule of Fees. The Commission
believes that waiver of the 30-day operative delay is consistent with
the protection of investors and the public interest. Therefore, the
Commission hereby waives the 30-day operative delay and designates the
proposed rule change as operative upon filing.\13\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \11\ 17 CFR 240.19b-4(f)(6).
    \12\ 17 CFR 240.19b-4(f)(6)(iii).
    \13\ For purposes only of waiving the 30-day operative delay,
the Commission has also considered the proposed rule's impact on
efficiency, competition, and capital formation. See 15 U.S.C.
78c(f).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    At any time within 60 days of the filing of the proposed rule
change, the Commission summarily may temporarily suspend such rule
change if it appears to the Commission that such action is: (i)
Necessary or appropriate in the public interest; (ii) for the
protection of investors; or (iii) otherwise in furtherance of the
purposes of the Act. If the Commission takes such action, the
Commission shall institute proceedings to determine whether the
proposed rule should be approved or disapproved.

IV. Solicitation of Comments

    Interested persons are invited to submit written data, views, and
arguments concerning the foregoing, including whether the proposed rule
change is consistent with the Act. Comments may be submitted by any of
the following methods:

Electronic Comments

     Use the Commission's internet comment form (http://www.sec.gov/rules/sro.shtml); or
     Send an email to [email protected]. Please include
File Number SR-GEMX-2018-18 on the subject line.

Paper Comments

     Send paper comments in triplicate to Secretary, Securities
and Exchange Commission, 100 F Street NE, Washington, DC 20549-1090.

All submissions should refer to File Number SR-GEMX-2018-18. This file
number should be included on the subject line if email is used. To help
the Commission process and review your comments more efficiently,
please use only one method. The Commission will post all comments on
the Commission's internet website (http://www.sec.gov/rules/sro.shtml).
Copies of the submission, all subsequent amendments, all written
statements with respect to the proposed rule change that are filed with
the Commission, and all written communications relating to the proposed
rule change between the Commission and any person, other than those
that may be withheld from the public in accordance with the provisions
of 5 U.S.C. 552, will be available for website viewing and printing in
the Commission's Public Reference Room, 100 F Street NE, Washington, DC
20549, on official business days between the hours of 10:00 a.m. and
3:00 p.m. Copies of the filing also will be available for inspection
and copying at the principal office of the Exchange. All comments
received will be posted without change. Persons submitting comments are
cautioned that we do not redact or edit personal identifying
information from comment submissions. You should submit only
information that you wish to make available publicly. All submissions
should refer to File Number SR-GEMX-2018-18 and should be submitted on
or before June 29, 2018.

    For the Commission, by the Division of Trading and Markets,
pursuant to delegated authority.\14\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \14\ 17 CFR 200.30-3(a)(12).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

Eduardo A. Aleman,
Assistant Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2018-12321 Filed 6-7-18; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 8011-01-P


SUPPORTING STATEMENT

	ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY

NESHAP for Marine Tank Vessel Leading Operations (40 CFR Part 63,
Subpart Y) (Renewal)

1.  Identification of the Information Collection

1(a)  Title of the Information Collection

NESHAP for Marine Tank Vessel Leading Operations (40 CFR Part 63,
Subpart Y) (Renewal), EPA ICR Number 1679.06, OMB Control Number
2060-0289

1(b)  Short Characterization/Abstract

The National Emission Standards for Hazardous Air Pollutants (NESHAP)
for Marine Tank Vessel Loading Operations, published at 40 CFR part 63,
subpart Y, were proposed on May 13, 1994, and promulgated on September
19, 1995.  These regulations apply maximum achievable control technology
(MACT) standards to existing facilities and new facilities that load
marine tank vessels with petroleum or gasoline and have aggregate actual
HAP emissions of 10 tons or more of HAP or 25 tons or more of all HAP
combined.  These regulations also apply reasonably available control
technology (RACT) standards to such facilities with an annual throughput
of 10 million or more barrels of gasoline or 200 million or more barrels
of crude oil.  New facilities include those that commenced construction
or reconstruction after the date of proposal.  This information is being
collected to assure compliance with 40 CFR part 63, subpart Y.

In general, all NESHAP standards require initial notifications,
performance tests, and periodic reports by the owners/operators of the
affected facilities.  They are also required to maintain records of the
occurrence and duration of any startup, shutdown, or malfunction in the
operation of an affected facility, or any period during which the
monitoring system is inoperative.  These notifications, reports, and
records are essential in determining compliance, and are required of all
affected facilities subject to NESHAP.

Any owner/operator subject to the provisions of this part shall maintain
a file of these measurements, and retain the file for at least five
years following the date of such measurements, maintenance reports, and
records.  In addition, the owner/operator shall keep the written
operation and maintenance plan on record for the life of the facility.
All reports are sent to the delegated state or local authority.  In the
event that there is no such delegated authority, the reports are sent
directly to the United States Environmental Protection Agency (EPA)
regional office.

Approximately 804 sources are currently subject to the standard.  Of the
804 sources 38 of the existing sources are currently subject to the
emissions standard, and the remaining 766 facilities are not subject to
the emissions standards, but are still subject to some of the
recordkeeping requirements.  It is estimated that there will be no new
growth in the industry over the next three years.

There are approximately 804 marine tank vessel loading plants in the
United States, which are owned and operated by the Marine Tank Vessel
Loading industry.  All these 804 facilities in the United States are
owned and operated by privately-owned, for-profit businesses.  You can
find the burden to the “Affected Public” listed below in Table 1:
Annual Industry Burden and Cost - NESHAP for Marine Tank Vessel Loading
Operations (40 CFR Part 63, Subpart Y).  The Federal government burden
does not include work performed by Federal employees.  The burden refers
only to work performed by contractors, which could be found listed below
in Table 2: Average Annual EPA Burden - NESHAP for Marine Tank Vessel
Loading Operations (40 CFR Part 63, Subpart Y).

The Office of Management and Budget (OMB) approved the currently active
ICR without any “Terms of Clearance.”

2.  Need for and Use of the Collection

2(a)  Need/Authority for the Collection

The EPA is charged under section 112 of the Clean Air Act, as amended,
to establish standards of performance for each category or subcategory
of major sources and area sources of hazardous air pollutants (HAP).
These standards are applicable to new or existing sources of HAP and
shall require the maximum degree of emission reduction.  In addition,
section 114(a) states that the Administrator may require any owner or
operator subject to any requirement of this Act to:

“(A) Establish and maintain such records; (B) make such reports; (C)
install, use, and maintain such monitoring equipment, and use such audit
procedures, or methods; (D) sample such emissions (in accordance with
such procedures or methods, at such locations, at such intervals, during
such periods, and in such manner as the Administrator shall prescribe);
(E) keep records on control equipment parameters, production variables
or other indirect data when direct monitoring of emissions is
impractical; (F) submit compliance certifications in accordance with
Section 114(a)(3); and (G) provide such other information as the
Administrator may reasonably require.”

In the Administrator's judgment, HAP and volatile organic compounds
(VOC) emissions from marine tank vessel loading operations cause or
contribute to air pollution that may reasonably be anticipated to
endanger public health or welfare.  Therefore, the NESHAP was
promulgated for this source category at 40 CFR part 63, subpart Y.

2(b)  Practical Utility/Users of the Data

The recordkeeping and reporting requirements in the standard ensure
compliance with the applicable regulations which where promulgated in
accordance with the Clean Air Act.  The collected information is also
used for targeting inspections and as evidence in legal proceedings.

Performance tests are required in order to determine an affected
facility’s initial capability to comply with the emission standard.
Continuous emission monitors are used to ensure compliance with the
standard at all times.  During the performance tests, a record of the
operating parameters under which compliance was achieved may be recorded
and used to determine compliance in place of a continuous emission
monitor.

The notifications required in the standard are used to inform the Agency
or delegated authority when a source becomes subject to the requirements
of the regulations.  The reviewing authority may then inspect the source
to ensure that the pollution control devices are properly installed and
operated, that leaks are being detected and repaired, and that the
standards are being met.  The performance test may also be observed.

3.  Nonduplication, Consultations, and Other Collection Criteria

The requested recordkeeping and reporting are required under 40 CFR part
63, subpart Y.

3(a)  Nonduplication

If the subject standards have not been delegated, the information is
sent directly to the appropriate EPA regional office.  Otherwise, the
information is sent directly to the delegated state or local agency.  If
a state or local agency has adopted their own similar standards to
implement the Federal standards, a copy of the report submitted to the
state or local agency can be sent to the Administrator in lieu of the
report required by the Federal standards; therefore, no duplication
exists.

3(b)  Public Notice Required Prior to ICR Submission to OMB

An announcement of a public comment period for the renewal of this ICR
was published in the Federal Register (72 FR 10736) on March 9, 2007.
No comments were received on the burden published in the Federal
Register.

3(c)  Consultations

The Agency’s industry experts have been consulted, and the Agency’s
internal data sources and projections of industry growth over the next
three years have been considered.  The primary source of information as
reported by industry, in compliance with the recordkeeping and reporting
provisions in the standard, is the Online Tracking Information System
(OTIS) which is operated and maintained by the EPA Office of Compliance.
 OTIS is the EPA database for the collection, maintenance, and retrieval
of all compliance data.  The growth rate for the industry is based on
our consultations with the Agency’s internal industry experts.
Approximately 804 respondents will be subject to the standard over the
three-year period covered by this ICR.

Industry trade associations and other interested parties were provided
an opportunity to comment on the burden associated with the standard as
it was being developed, and the standard has been previously reviewed to
determine the minimum information needed for compliance purposes.

It is our policy to respond after a thorough review of comments received
since the last ICR renewal as well as those submitted in response to the
First Federal Register Notice.

3(d)  Effects of Less Frequent Collection

Less frequent information collection would decrease the margin of
assurance that facilities are continuing to meet the standards.
Requirements for information gathering and recordkeeping are useful
techniques to ensure that good operation and maintenance practices are
applied and emission limitations are met.  If the information required
by these standards was collected less frequently, the proper operation
and maintenance of control equipment and the possibility of detecting
violations would be less likely.

3(e)  General Guidelines

None of these reporting or recordkeeping requirements violate any of the
regulations established by OMB at 5 CFR part 1320, section 1320.5.

These standards require the respondents to maintain all records,
including reports and notifications for at least five years.  This is
consistent with the General Provisions as applied to the standards.  EPA
believes that the five-year records retention requirement is consistent
with the Part 70 permit program and the five-year statute of limitations
on which the permit program is based.  The retention of records for five
years allows EPA to establish the compliance history of a source, any
pattern of non-compliance, and to determine the appropriate level of
enforcement action.  EPA has found that the most flagrant violators have
violations extending beyond the five years.  In addition, EPA would be
prevented from pursuing the violators due to either the destruction or
nonexistence of essential records.

3(f)  Confidentiality

Any information submitted to the Agency for which a claim of
confidentiality is made will be safeguarded according to the Agency
policies set forth in title 40, chapter 1, part 2, subpart B -
Confidentiality of Business Information  (CBI) (see 40 CFR 2; 41 FR
36902, September 1, 1976; amended by 43 FR 40000, September 8, 1978; 43
FR 42251, September 20, 1978; 44 FR 17674, March 23, 1979).

3(g)  Sensitive Questions

None of the reporting or recordkeeping requirements contain sensitive
questions.

4.  The Respondents and the Information Requested

4(a)  Respondents/SIC Codes

The respondents to the recordkeeping and reporting requirements are
marine tank vessel loading operations at marine terminals.  The United
States Standard Industrial Classification (SIC) code for the respondents
affected by the standards is 4491, which corresponds to the North
American Industry Classification System (NAICS) 488320 for Marine Cargo
Handling, and 488310 for Port and Harbor Operations.

4(b)  Information Requested

None of these reporting or recordkeeping requirements violate any of the
regulations established by OMB at 5 CFR part 1320, section 1320.5.

(i)  Data Items

In this ICR, all the data recorded or reported is required by the
National Emission Standards for Hazardous Air Pollutants for Marine Tank
Vessel Loading Operations (40 CFR Part 63, Subpart Y).

A source must make the following reports:

Notifications

Notification of performance test	63.7(b), 63.9(e), 63.567(a)

Notification of the date the continuous monitoring system (CMS)
performance evaluation is scheduled to begin.	63.8(e)(2), 63.9(g)(1),
63.567(a)

Notification of compliance status.	63.9(h), 63.567(a)

Notifications of adjustments to time periods or deadlines for submittal
and review of required communications.	63.9(i), 63.567(a)

Notification of changes in information provided to the Administrator.
63.9(j), 63.567(a)

Initial notifications, applications for approval of construction or
reconstruction.	63.5, 63.566, 63.567(a) and (b)(1)-(b)(5)

Notification of intent to construct/reconstruct.	63.5, 63.9(b)(4),
63.567(a) and (b)(4)(i)

Notification of the date when construction/reconstruction was commenced.
63.567(a) and (b)(4)(ii)

Notification of the anticipated date of startup of the source.
63.567(b)(4)(iii)

Notification of the actual date of startup of the source.	63.567(a) and
(b)(4)(iv)

Additional initial notifications for MACT sources.	63.567(b)(5)

Request for extension of compliance.	63.6(i)(4)(i)(B), (i)(5), and
(i)(6), 63.567(c)

Reports

Report of performance (opacity) testing of flares.	63.567(d), 63.565(e),
63.11

Annual summary reports of excess emissions and continuous monitoring
system performance reports (semiannual, if there are excess emissions).
63.10(c)(5), 63.10(c)(8), 63.10(c)(10) through (c)(13), 63.563(b),
63.567(a) and (e)

Engineering report for vapor collection systems.	63.567(f)

Annual report of source(s HAP control efficiency including
identification of each pollutant monitored.	63.10(e)(3)(vi), 63.565(l),
63.567(a) and (j)(3)

Reporting results of performance tests/evaluations.	63.7, 63.8(e),
63.9(h), 63.10(d), 63.10(e)(1), 63.567(a)

Progress reports related to an extension of compliance.	63.6(i),
63.10(d)(4), 63.567(a)

A source must keep the following records:

Recordkeeping

Records of all excess emissions and monitoring system performance
reports.	63.567(e)(4)

Records of engineering reports describing vent system or vapor
collection system.	63.567(f)

Records of all periods when flow bypassing the control device is
indicated.	63.563(a)(1), 63.564(b), 63.567(g)(1)

Records of changes in position and maintenance of car-sealed valves.
63.564(b)(3), 63.567(g)(2)

Records of vapor tightness documentation.	63.563(a)(4), 63.567(h)

Documentation of vapor tightness test results for marine tank vessels.
63.563(a)(4), 63.565(c)(1) and (2), 63.567(i)

Retain records of the current, written operation and maintenance plan
for the life of the source.  If plan is revised, retain records of the
previous (i.e., superseded) operation and maintenance plan for at least
5 years after the revision.	63.562(e)(5)

Records of measurements and calculations used to identify exempted
commodities.	63.560(d), 63.567(j)(1)

Records of emissions estimation calculations.	63.565(l), 63.567(j)(2)

Records of emissions estimates and actual throughput for owners and
operators of marine tank vessel loading operations.	63.560(a)(3),
63.565(l), 63.567(j)(4)

Records of leak detection and repair of vapor collection systems and
control devices.	63.563(c), 63.567(k)

Records of the occurrence and duration of each malfunction of the
control equipment.	63.10(b)(2)(ii), 63.567(a)

Records of all maintenance performed on the air pollution control
equipment.	63.10(b)(2)(iii), 63.567(a)

Records of periods during which a CMS is malfunctioning.
63.10(b)(2)(vi), 63.567(a)

Records of all measurements, results from performance tests, CMS
calibration checks, adjustments made to CMS, emission levels,
information demonstrating whether a source is meeting the requirements
for a waiver, and supporting documentation for initial notifications and
notification of compliance status.	63.10(b)(2)(vii) through (b)(2)(xiv),
63.567(a)

Records of all CMS measurements.	63.10(c)(1), 63.567(a)

Records of all CMS malfunctions or exceedances.	63.10(c)(8) and (c)(10)
through (c)(13), 63.567(a)

Electronic Reporting

Some of the respondents are using monitoring equipment that
automatically records parameter data.  Although personnel at the
affected facility must still evaluate the data, internal automation has
significantly reduced the burden associated with monitoring and
recordkeeping at a plant site.

Also, regulatory agencies in cooperation with the respondents continue
to create reporting systems to transmit data electronically.  However,
electronic reporting systems are still not widely used.  At this time,
it is estimated that approximately 10 percent of the respondents use
electronic reporting.

Respondent Activities

Read instructions.

Install, calibrate, maintain, and operate CMS for opacity, temperature
change, and VOC emissions temperature change, and VOC emissions for
control devices listed in 40 CFR 63.564(a) through (j).

Perform initial performance test, using the procedures listed in 40 CFR
63.7 according to the applicability in Table 1 of section 63.560, the
procedures listed in section 63.564, and the test methods listed in
section 63.565, and repeat performance tests if necessary.

Write the notifications and reports listed above.

Enter information required to be recorded above.

Submit the required reports developing, acquiring, installing, and
utilizing technology and systems for the purpose of collecting,
validating, and verifying information.

Develop, acquire, install, and utilize technology and systems for the
purposes of processing,   maintaining, disclosing, and providing
information.

Adjust the existing ways to comply with any previously applicable
instructions and requirements.

Train personnel to respond to a collection of information.

Transmit, or otherwise disclose the information.

	Currently, sources are using monitoring equipment that provides
parameter data in an automated way e.g., continuous parameter monitoring
system.  Although personnel at the source still need to evaluate the
data, this type of monitoring equipment has significantly reduced the
burden associated with monitoring and recordkeeping.

5.  The Information Collected: Agency Activities, Collection
Methodology, and Information Management

5(a)  AgencyActivities

EPA conducts the following activities in connection with the
acquisition, analysis, storage, and distribution of the required
information.

Agency Activities

Observe initial performance tests and repeat performance tests if
necessary.

Review notifications and reports, including performance test reports,
excess emissions reports, required to be submitted by industry.

Audit facility records.

Input, analyze, and maintain data in the Online Tracking Information
System (OTIS).

5(b)  Collection Methodology and Management

Following notification of startup, the reviewing authority might inspect
the source to determine whether the pollution control devices are
properly installed and operational.  Performance test reports are used
by the Agency to discern a source’s initial capability to comply with
the emission standard, and note the operating conditions under which
compliance was achieved.  Data and records maintained by the respondents
are tabulated and published for use in compliance and enforcement
programs.

Information contained in the reports is entered into OTIS which is
operated and maintained by the EPA Office of Compliance.  OTIS is the
EPA database for the collection, maintenance, and retrieval of
compliance data for approximately 125,000 industrial and
government-owned facilities.  EPA uses OTIS for tracking air pollution
compliance and enforcement by local and state regulatory agencies, EPA
regional offices, and EPA headquarters.  EPA delegated Authorities can
edit, store, retrieve and analyze the data.

The records required by this regulation must be retained by either the
owner or operator for five years.

5(c)  Small Entity Flexibility

The majority of the respondents are large entities (i.e., large
businesses).  However, the impact on small entities (i.e., small
businesses) was taken into consideration during the development of the
regulation.  Due to technical considerations involving the process
operations and the types of control equipment employed, the
recordkeeping and reporting requirements are the same for both small and
large entities.  The Agency considers these to be the minimum
requirements needed to ensure compliance and, therefore, cannot reduce
them further for small entities.  To the extent that larger businesses
can use economies of scale to reduce their burden, the overall burden
will be reduced.

5(d)  Collection Schedule

The specific frequency for each information collection activity within
this request is shown in Table 1: Annual Industry Burden for NESHAP for
Marine Tank Vessel Loading Operations (40 CFR Part 63, Subpart Y),
below.

6.  Estimating the Burden and Cost of the Collection

Table 1 documents the computation of individual burdens for the
recordkeeping and reporting requirements applicable to the industry for
the subpart included in this ICR.  The individual burdens are expressed
under standardized headings believed to be consistent with the concept
of burden under the Paperwork Reduction Act.  Wherever appropriate,
specific tasks and major assumptions have been identified.  Responses to
this information collection are mandatory.

The Agency may not conduct or sponsor, and a person is not required to
respond to, a collection of information unless it displays a currently
valid OMB Control Number.

6(a)  Estimating Respondent Burden

The average annual burden to industry over the next three years from
these recordkeeping and reporting requirements is estimated to be 9,872
(Total Labor Hours from Table 1).  These hours are based on Agency
studies and background documents from the development of the regulation,
Agency knowledge and experience with the NESHAP program, the previously
approved ICR, and any comments received.

6(b)  Estimating Respondent Costs

(i)  Estimating Labor Costs

	This ICR uses the following labor rates:

Managerial 	$95.32   ($45.39 + 110%)

Technical	$64.60   ($30.76 + 110%)

Clerical	$40.09   ($19.09 + 110%)

These rates are from the United States Department of Labor, Bureau of
Labor Statistics, December 2003, “Table 10. Private industry, by
occupational and industry group.”  These rates are from column 1,
“Total compensation.”  The rates have been increased by 110 percent
to account for the benefit packages available to those employed by
private industry.

(ii)  Estimating Capital/Startup and Operation and Maintenance Costs

	The only costs to the regulated industry resulting from information
collection activities required by the subject standard are labor costs.
There are no capital/startup or operation and maintenance costs.

(iii)  Capital/Startup vs. Operation and Maintenance (O&M) Costs

The only type of industry costs associated with the information
collection activity in the regulations is labor costs.  There are no
capital/startup or operation and maintenance costs.

6(c)  Estimating Agency Burden and Cost

The only costs to the Agency are those costs associated with analysis of
the reported information.  The EPA compliance and enforcement program
includes activities such as: the examination of records maintained by
the respondents, periodic inspection of sources of emissions, and the
publication and distribution of collected information.

The average annual Agency cost during the three years of the ICR is
estimated to be $27,657.

This cost is based on the average hourly labor rate as follows:

Managerial	$54.66   (GS-13, Step 5, $34.16 + 60%)

Technical	$40.56   (GS-12, Step 1, $25.35 + 60%)

Clerical	$21.95   (GS-6, Step 3, $13.72 + 60%)

These rates are from the Office of Personnel Management (OPM) “2004
General Schedule” which excludes locality rates of pay.  The rates
have been increased by 60 percent to account for the benefit packages
available to government employees.  Details upon which this estimate is
based appear in Table 2: Average Annual EPA Burden, NESHAP for Marine
Tank Vessel Loading Operations (40 CFR Part 63, Subpart Y) below.

6(d)  Estimating the Respondent Universe and Total Burden and Costs

	Based on our research for this ICR, on average over the next three
years, approximately 804 respondents will be subject to the standard.
It is estimated that no additional sources per year will become subject.
 The overall average number of respondents, as shown in the table below,
is 804 per year.

	The number of respondents is calculated using the following table which
addresses the three years covered by this ICR.

Number of Respondents

Year	(A)

Number of New Respondents 1	(B)

Number of Existing Respondents	(C)

Number of Existing Respondents That Keep Records But Do Not Submit
Reports	(D)

Number of Existing Respondents That Are Also New Respondents	(E)

Number of Respondents

(E=A+B+C-D)

1	0	38	766	0	804

2	0	38	766	0	804

3	0	38	766	0	804

Average	0	38	766	0	804

1 New respondent include sources with constructed, reconstructed and
modified affected facilities.

To avoid double-counting respondents, column D is subtracted.  As shown
above, the average Number of Respondents over the three-year period of
this ICR is 804.

The total number of annual responses per year is calculated using the
following table:

Total Annual Responses

(A)

Information Collection Activity	(B)

Number of Respondents	(C)

Number of Responses	(D)

Number of Existing Respondents That Keep Records But Do Not Submit
Reports	(E)

Total Annual Responses

E=(BxC)+D

Notification of construction/reconstruction	0	1	0	0

Notification of anticipated startup	0	1	0	0

Notification of actual startup	0	1	0	0

Initial notification of applicability report	0	1	0	0

Waiver application	0	1	0	0

Alternate test method/monitoring application	0	1	0	0

Preparation of site-specific test plan	0	1	0	0

Notification of initial compliance test date	0	1	0	0

Notification of initial compliance status (initial performance test)	0	1
0	0

Annual report of excess emissions and monitoring exceedances and/or
summary report	38	1	0	38

Annual report of HAP control efficiency	38	1	0	38

Retain records of emissions estimates and actual throughtput	0	1	766	766

	Total	842

The number of Total Annual Responses is 842.

The total annual labor costs are $629,850.  Details regarding these
estimates may be found in Table 1: Annual Industry Burden and Cost -
NESHAP for Marine Tank Vessel Loading Operations (40 CFR Part 63,
Subpart Y), below.

6(e)  Bottom Line Burden Hours Burden Hours and Cost Tables

The detailed bottom line burden hours and cost calculations for the
respondents and the Agency are shown in Tables 1 and 2, respectively,
and summarized below.

(i)  Respondent Tally

The total annual labor costs are $629,850.  Details regarding these
estimates may be found in Table 1. Annual Respondent Burden and Cost:
NESHAP for Marine Tank Vessel Loading Operations (40 CFR Part 63,
Subpart Y), below.  Furthermore, the annual public reporting and
recordkeeping burden for this collection of information is estimated to
average 12 hours per response.

The total annual capital/startup and O&M costs to the regulated entity
are $0.

(ii)  The Agency Tally

The average annual Agency burden and cost over next three years is
estimated to be 699 labor hours at a cost of $27,657.  See Table 2.
Annual Agency Burden and Cost: NESHAP for Marine Tank Vessel Loading
Operations (40 CFR Part 63, Subpart Y), below.

6(f)  Reasons for Change in Burden

There is no change in the labor hours or cost in this ICR compared to
the previous ICR.  This is due to two considerations.  First, the
regulations have not changed over the past three years and are not
anticipated to change over the next three years.  Secondly, the growth
rate for the industry is very low, negative or non-existent, so there is
no significant change in the overall burden.

Since there are no changes in the regulatory requirements and there is
no significant industry growth, the labor hours and cost figures in the
previous ICR are used in this ICR, and there is no change in burden to
industry.

6(g)  Burden Statement

The annual public reporting and recordkeeping burden for this collection
of information is estimated to average 12 hours per response.  Burden
means the total time, effort, or financial resources expended by persons
to generate, maintain, retain, or disclose or provide information to or
for a Federal agency.  This includes the time needed to review
instructions; develop, acquire, install, and utilize technology and
systems for the purposes of collecting, validating, and verifying
information, processing and maintaining information, and disclosing and
providing information; adjust the existing ways to comply with any
previously applicable instructions and requirements; train personnel to
be able to respond to a collection of information; search data sources;
complete and review the collection of information; and transmit or
otherwise disclose the information.

An agency may not conduct nor sponsor, and a person is not required to
respond to, a collection of information unless it displays a valid OMB
Control Number.  The OMB Control Numbers for EPAs regulations are listed
at 40 CFR part 9 and 48 CFR chapter 15.

To comment on the Agency's need for this information, the accuracy of
the provided burden estimates, and any suggested methods for minimizing
respondent burden, including the use of automated collection techniques,
EPA has established a public docket for this ICR under Docket ID Number
EPA-HQ-OECA-2007-0058.  An electronic version of the public docket is
available at   HYPERLINK "http://www.regulations.gov/"
http://www.regulations.gov/  which may be used to obtain a copy of the
draft collection of information, submit or view public comments, access
the index listing of the content of the docket, and to access those
documents in the public docket that are available electronically.  When
in the system, select “search” than key in the docket ID number
identified in this document.  The documents are also available for
public viewing at the Enforcement and Compliance Docket and Information
Center in the EPA Docket Center (EPA/DC), EPA West, Room 3334, 1301
Constitution Avenue, N.W., Washington, DC.  The EPA Docket Center Public
Reading Room is open from 8:30 a.m. to 4:30 p.m., Monday through Friday,
excluding legal holidays.  The telephone number for the Reading Room is
(202) 566-1744, and the telephone number for the Enforcement and
Compliance Docket and Information Center Docket is<PHONE_NUMBER>.
Also, you can send comments to the Office of Information and Regulatory
Affairs, Office of Management and Budget, 725 17th Street, N.W.,
Washington, DC 20503, Attention: Desk Officer for EPA.  Please include
the EPA Docket ID Number EPA-HQ-OECA-2007-0058 and OMB Control Number
2060-0289 in any correspondence.

Part B of the Supporting Statement

This part is not applicable because no statistical methods were used in
collecting this information.

Table 1:  Annual Respondent Burden and Cost – NESHAP for Marine Tank
Vessel Loading Operations (40 CFR Part 63, Subpart Y) (Renewal)

Burden item	(A)

Person hours per occurrence	(B)

No. of occurrences per respondent per year	(C)

Person hours per respondent per year

(C=AxB)	(D)

Respondents per year  a	(E)

Technical person- hours per year

(E=CxD)	(F)

Management person hours per year

(Ex0.05)	(G)

Clerical person hours per year

(Ex0.1)	(H)

Cost, $  b, c

1.  Applications	N/A

	2.  Survey and Studies	N/A

	3.  Reporting requirements

     A.  Read instructions 	1	1	1	38	38	2	4	$2,788

     B.  Required activities

            i.  Performance test d	280	1	280	0	0	0	0	$0

           ii.  Repeat performance test d, e, f	280	1	280	0	0	0	0	$0

          iii.  Annual leak check g	16	1	16	38	608	30	61	$44,612

          iv.  Annual vapor tightness check h, I, j	8	1	8	450	3,600	180
360	$264,150

     C.  Create information	See 3B

	     D.  Gather existing information	See 3E

	     E.  Write Report

           Notification of construction/reconstruction 	2	1	2	0	0	0	0	$0

           Notification of anticipated startup 	2	1	2	0	0	0	0	$0

           Notification of actual startup 	2	1	2	0	0	0	0	$0

           Initial notification of applicability report 	4	1	4	0	0	0	0
$0

           Waiver application m	2	1	2	0	0	0	0	$0

           Alternative test method/monitoring application n 	1	1	1	0	0	0
0	$0

           Preparation of site-specific test plan	See 3B

	           Notification of initial compliance test date	2	1	2	0	0	0	0
$0

           Notification of initial compliance status (initial

           performance test)	See 3B

	           Notification of changes in information provided

           to administrator	1	1	1	0	0	0	0	$0

           Request for extension of compliance	1	1	1	0	0	0	0	$0

           Extension of compliance progress reports	1	1	1	0	0	0	0	$0

           Report of results of performance test/

           evaluations	1	1	1	0	0	0	0	$0

           Annual excess emissions and monitoring

           exceedances report and/or summary report

           (ongoing compliance status report) k, o	32	1	32	38	1,216	61
122	$89,224

           Report of HAP control efficiency l	8	1	8	38	304	15	30	$22,306

4.  Recordkeeping requirements

     A.  Read instructions 	1	1	1	38	38	2	4	$2,788

     B.  Plan activities	N/A

	     C.  Implement Activities 	16	1	16	0	0	0	0	$0

     D.  Develop record system	16	1	16	0	0	0	0	$0

     E.  Time to enter information	1	52	51	38	1,976	99	198	$144,989

      F.  Time to train personnel	N/A

	     G.  Perform audits	N/A

	     H.  Retain records of emissions estimates and actual

           throughput (facilities with HAP emissions of

           less than 10 and 25 tons)	1	1	1	766	766	38	77	$56,205

      I.  Record and disclose information	1	1	1	38	38	2	4	$2,788

Subtotals Labor Burden and cost

	8,584	429	859	$629,850

TOTAL LABOR BURDEN AND COST (rounded)

9,872

$629,850

Assumptions:

a  We have assumed that there are approximately 804 sources that are
subject to the standard.  Of the 804 sources, 38 of the existing sources
are currently subject to the emissions standard, and the remaining 766
facilities are not subject to the emissions standards, but are still
subject to some of the recordkeeping requirements.  It is estimated that
there will be no new growth in the industry over the next three years.

b  This ICR uses the following labor rates:  $95.32 per hour for
Executive, Administrative, and Managerial labor; $64.60 per hour for
Technical labor, and $40.09

per hour for Clerical labor.  These rates are from the United States
Department of Labor, Bureau of Labor Statistics, December 2003, (Table
10. Private industry, by occupational and industry group.(  The rates
are from column 1, (Total compensation.(  The rates have been increased
by 110 percent to account for the benefit packages available to those
employed by private industry.

c  Calculation of burden and cost values reflects rounding of numbers.

d  We have assumed that this is a one-time-only costs.

e  We have assumed that 15 percent of the initial performance tests will
be repeated due to failure.

f  We have assumed that it will take each respondent 280 hours to
perform the test.

g  We have assumed it will take each respondent 16 hours once per year
to complete annual leak checks.

h  We have assumed that this burden is to the owners of marine vessels
and not to the affected facilities.

i  We have assumed that it will take each respondent eight hours once
per year to complete the vapor tightness check.

j  This number is based on factors calculated for the original ICR in
1995.  This ICR uses fleet factor and affected facility throughput and
then divided it in half.  We have

assumed that half of the facilities load at negative pressure.

k  We have assumed that it will take each respondent 32 hours once per
year to complete the ongoing compliance status report.

l   We have assumed that it will take each respondent 8 hours once per
year to complete the HAP control efficiency report.

m  We have assumed that 5 percent of respondents will request a waiver.

n  We have assumed that 1 percent of respondents will request
alternative test methods or monitoring methods.

o  Semiannual reports are required when there are excess emissions.  We
have assumed that there will be no excess emissions; therefore, each
respondent will submit one excess emissions and monitoring exceedances
report and/or summary report once per year.

Table 2:  Average Annual EPA Burden - NESHAP for Marine Tank Vessel
Loading Operations (40 CFR Part 63, Subpart Y) (Renewal)

Activity	(A)

EPA person- hours per occurrence	(B)

No. of occurrences per plant per year	(C)

EPA person- hours per plant per year

(C=AxB)	(D)

Plants per year  a	(E)

Technical person- hours per year

(E=CxD)	(F)

Management person-hours per year

(Ex0.05)

	(G)

Clerical person-hours per year

(Ex0.1)	(H)

Cost, $ b

Activity

1.  Initial performance test c, d	40	1	40	0	0	0	0	$0

2.  Repeat performance test c, d	40	1	40	0	0	0	0	$0

3.  Report review

     Notification of construction/

     reconstruction c	2	1	2	0	0	0	0	$0

     Notification of anticipated startup c 	2	1	2	0	0	0	0	$0

     Notification of actual startup c	2	1	2	0	0	0	0	$0

     Initial notification of applicability report c	2	1	2	0	0	0	0	$0

     Notification of initial compliance test date c	2	1	2	0	0	0	0	$0

     Waiver application c, e	2	1	2	0	0	0	0	$0

     Notification of initial compliance status c	4	1	4	0	0	0	0	$0

     Review of alternate test method/monitoring

     application c, f	1	1	1	0	0	0	0	$0

     Review of excess emissions and

     monitoring exceedances report and/or

     summary report g	8	1	8	38	304	15.2	30.4	$13,828.35

     Report of HAP control efficiency h	8	3	8	38	304	15.2	30.4
$13,828.35

Subtotals Labor Burden and cost

	604	30.4	60.8	$27,656.70

TOTAL ANNUAL BURDEN AND COST (rounded)

	699.2

699 (rounded)	$27,657

 	Assumptions:

a  We have assumed that there are approximately 804 sources that are
subject to the standard.  Of the 804 sources, 38 of the existing sources
are currently subject to the emissions standard, and the remaining 766
facilities are not subject to the emissions standards, but are still
subject to some of the recordkeeping requirements.  It is estimated that
there will be no new growth in the industry over the next three years.

b  This cost is based on the following hourly labor rates times a 1.6
benefits multiplication factor to account for government overhead
expenses: $54.66 for Managerial (GS-13, Step 5, $34.16 x 1.6), $40.56
for Technical (GS-12, Step 1, $25.35 x 1.6) and $21.95 Clerical (GS-6,
Step 3, $13.72 x 1.6).  These rates are from the Office of Personnel
Management (OPM) (2004 General Schedule( which excludes locality rates
of pay.

c  We have assumed that this is a one-time-only cost.

d  We have assumed that EPA will attend 10 percent of the initial
performance tests and will not attend repeat tests.

e  We have assumed that 5 percent of respondents will request a waiver.

f  It is assumed that 1 percent of facilities will request alternative
test methods or monitoring methods.

g   Semiannual reports are required when there are excess emissions.  We
have assumed that there will be no excess emissions; therefore, each
facility will submit one excess emissions and monitoring exceedances
report and/or summary report each year.

h  We have assumed that it will take 8 hours for each respondent to
review the report.

 PAGE

 PAGE   18

 PAGE