to meet an applicable standard, and to provide data that may document
how the source met the general duty to minimize emissions during a
failure to meet an applicable standard.
    We will no longer require owners or operators to determine whether
actions taken to correct a malfunction are consistent with an SSM plan,
because plans would no longer be required. The proposed amendments,
therefore, eliminate the cross reference to 40 CFR 63.10(d)(5)(i) that
contains the description of the previously required SSM report format
and submittal schedule from this section. These specifications are no
longer necessary because the events will be reported in otherwise
required reports with similar format and submittal requirements.
    The proposed amendments also eliminate the cross reference to 40
CFR 63.10(d)(5)(ii). Section 63.10(d)(5)(ii)

describes an immediate report for startups, shutdowns, and malfunctions
when a source failed to meet an applicable standard, but did not follow
the SSM plan. We will no longer require owners and operators to report
when actions taken during a startup, shutdown, or malfunction were not
consistent with an SSM plan, because plans would no longer be required.
h. Definitions
    We are proposing that definitions of ``Startup'' and ``Shutdown''
be added to 40 CFR 63.3004. The current rule relies on the 40 CFR part
63, subpart A, definitions of these terms which are based on the
setting in operation of, and cessation of operation of, the affected
source (i.e., drying and curing oven). As previously explained in this
section, the formaldehyde standards can only be met during periods that
fiberglass mat is being dried and cured in the oven. Because we are
proposing that standards in this rule apply at all times, we find it
appropriate to propose definitions of startup and shutdown based on
these periods to clarify that it is the setting in operation of, and
cessation of operation of, the drying and curing of wet-formed
fiberglass mat that define startup and shutdown for purposes of 40 CFR
part 63, subpart HHHH. The new definition of ``Startup'' being proposed
reads: ``Startup means the setting in operation of the drying and
curing of wet-formed fiberglass mat for any purpose. Startup begins
when resin infused fiberglass mat enters the oven to be dried and cured
for the first time or after a shutdown event.'' The new definition of
``Shutdown'' being proposed reads: ``Shutdown means the cessation of
operation of the drying and curing of wet-formed fiberglass mat for any
purpose. Shutdown ends when fiberglass mat is no longer being dried or
cured in the oven and the oven no longer contains any resin infused
binder.''
    We are proposing that the definition of ``Deviation'' in 40 CFR
63.3004 be revised to remove language that differentiates between
normal operations, startup and shutdown, and malfunction events. The
current definition of ``Deviation'' is ``any instance in which an
affected source subject to this subpart, or an owner or operator of
such a source: (1) Fails to meet any requirement or obligation
established by this subpart, including, but not limited to, any
emission limit, or operating limit, or work practice standard; (2)
fails to meet any term or condition that is adopted to implement an
applicable requirement in this subpart and that is included in the
operating permit for any affected source required to obtain such a
permit; or (3) fails to meet any emission limit, or operating limit, or
work practice standard in this subpart during startup, shutdown, or
malfunction, regardless of whether or not such failure is permitted by
this subpart.'' The revised definition of ``Deviation'' being proposed
which eliminates the third criteria reads: ``Deviation means any
instance in which an affected source subject to this subpart, or an
owner or operator of such a source: (1) Fails to meet any requirement
or obligation established by this subpart including, but not limited
to, any emission limit, operating limit, or work practice standard; or
(2) fails to meet any term or condition that is adopted to implement an
applicable requirement in this subpart and that is included in the
operating permit for any affected source required to obtain such a
permit.''
2. Monitoring, Recordkeeping, and Reporting Requirements
    The EPA proposes to revise the rule's monitoring, recordkeeping,
and reporting requirements in three ways: (1) Performance test results
would be submitted electronically; (2) compliance reports would be
submitted semiannually when deviations from applicable standards occur;
and (3) parameter monitoring would no longer be required during periods
when a non-HAP binder is being used.
a. Electronic Reporting
    40 CFR part 63, subpart HHHH does not currently require electronic
reporting. Through this action, the EPA is proposing that owners and
operators of wet-formed fiberglass mat production facilities subject to
40 CFR part 63, subpart HHHH, submit electronic copies of required
performance test reports through the EPA's Central Data Exchange (CDX)
using the Compliance and Emissions Data Reporting Interface (CEDRI).
The EPA believes that the electronic submittal of the reports addressed
in this proposed rulemaking will increase the usefulness of the data
contained in those reports, is in keeping with current trends in data
availability, will further assist in the protection of public health
and the environment, and will ultimately result in less burden on the
regulated community. Under current requirements, paper test reports are
often stored in filing cabinets or boxes, which make the reports more
difficult to obtain and use for data analysis and sharing. Electronic
storage of such reports would make data more accessible for review,
analyses, and sharing. Electronic reporting also eliminates paper-
based, manual processes, thereby saving time and resources, simplifying
data entry, eliminating redundancies, minimizing data reporting errors,
and providing data quickly and accurately to affected facilities, air
agencies, the EPA, and the public.
    In 2011, in response to Executive Order 13563, the EPA developed a
plan \15\ to periodically review its regulations to determine if they
should be modified, streamlined, expanded, or repealed in an effort to
make regulations more effective and less burdensome. The plan includes
replacing outdated paper reporting with electronic reporting. In
keeping with this plan and the White House's Digital Government
Strategy,\16\ in 2013 the EPA issued an agency-wide policy specifying
that new regulations will require reports to be electronic to the
maximum extent possible.\17\ By proposing electronic submission of
performance test reports for 40 CFR part 63, subpart HHHH facilities,
the EPA is taking steps to implement this policy.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \15\ EPA's Improving Our Regulations: Final Plan for Periodic
Retrospective Reviews of Existing Regulations, August 2011.
Available at: https://www.regulations.gov, Document ID No. EPA-HQ-
OA-2011-0156-0154.
    \16\ Digital Government: Building a 21st Century Platform to
Better Serve the American People, May 2012. Available at: https://obamawhitehouse.archives.gov/sites/default/files/omb/egov/digital-government/digital-government.html.
    \17\ E-Reporting Policy Statement for EPA Regulations, September
2013. Available at: https://www.epa.gov/sites/production/files/2016-03/documents/epa-ereporting-policy-statement-2013-09-30.pdf.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    The EPA website that stores the submitted electronic data, WebFIRE,
is easily accessible to everyone and provides a user-friendly interface
that any stakeholder can access. By making data readily available,
electronic reporting increases the amount of data that can be used for
many purposes. One example is the development of emissions factors. An
emissions factor is a representative value that attempts to relate the
quantity of a pollutant released to the atmosphere with an activity
associated with the release of that pollutant (e.g., kg of particulate
emitted per Mg of coal burned). Such factors facilitate the estimation
of emissions from various sources of air pollution and are an important
tool in developing emissions inventories, which in turn are the basis
for numerous efforts, including trends analysis, regional and local
scale air quality modeling, regulatory impact assessments, and human
exposure modeling. Emissions factors are also widely used in regulatory
applicability

determinations and in permitting decisions.
    The EPA has received feedback from stakeholders asserting that many
of the EPA's emissions factors are outdated or not representative of a
particular industry emission source. While the EPA believes that the
emissions factors are suitable for their intended purpose, we recognize
that the quality of emissions factors varies based on the extent and
quality of underlying data. We also recognize that emissions profiles
on different pieces of equipment can change over time due to a number
of factors (fuel changes, equipment improvements, industry work
practices), and it is important for emissions factors to be updated to
keep up with these changes. The EPA is currently pursuing emissions
factor development improvements that include procedures to incorporate
the source test data that we are proposing be submitted electronically.
By requiring the electronic submission of the reports identified in
this proposed action, the EPA would be able to access and use the
submitted data to update emissions factors more quickly and
efficiently, creating factors that are characteristic of what is
currently representative of the relevant industry sector. Likewise, an
increase in the number of test reports used to develop the emissions
factors would provide more confidence that the factor is of higher
quality and representative of the whole industry sector.
    Additionally, by making the reports addressed in this proposed
rulemaking readily available, the EPA, the regulated community, and the
public will benefit when the EPA conducts its CAA-required technology
and risk-based reviews. As a result of having performance test reports
and air emission data readily accessible, our ability to carry out
comprehensive reviews will be increased and achieved within a shorter
period of time. These data will provide useful information on control
efficiencies being achieved and maintained in practice within a source
category and across source categories for regulated sources and
pollutants. These reports can also be used to inform the technology-
review process by providing information on improvements to add-on
technology and new control technology.
    Under an electronic reporting system, the EPA's Office of Air
Quality Planning and Standards (OAQPS) would have air emissions and
performance test data in hand; OAQPS would not have to collect these
data from the EPA Regional offices or from delegated air agencies or
industry sources in cases where these reports are not submitted to the
EPA Regional offices. Thus, we anticipate fewer or less substantial
information collection requests (ICRs) may be needed in conjunction
with prospective CAA-required technology and risk-based reviews. We
expect this to result in a decrease in time spent by industry to
respond to data collection requests. We also expect the ICRs to contain
less extensive stack testing provisions, as we will already have stack
test data electronically. Reduced testing requirements would be a cost
savings to industry. The EPA should also be able to conduct these
required reviews more quickly, as OAQPS will not have to include the
ICR collection time in the process or spend time collecting reports
from the EPA Regional offices. While the regulated community may
benefit from a reduced burden of ICRs, the general public benefits from
the agency's ability to provide these required reviews more quickly,
resulting in increased public health and environmental protection.
    Electronic reporting minimizes submission of unnecessary or
duplicative reports in cases where facilities report to multiple
government agencies and the agencies opt to rely on the EPA's
electronic reporting system to view report submissions. Where air
agencies continue to require a paper copy of these reports and will
accept a hard copy of the electronic report, facilities will have the
option to print paper copies of the electronic reporting forms to
submit to the air agencies, and, thus, minimize the time spent
reporting to multiple agencies. Additionally, maintenance and storage
costs associated with retaining paper records could likewise be
minimized by replacing those records with electronic records of
electronically submitted data and reports.
    Air agencies could benefit from more streamlined and automated
review of the electronically submitted data. For example, because
performance test data would be readily-available in standard electronic
format, air agencies would be able to review reports and data
electronically rather than having to conduct a review of the reports
and data manually. Having reports and associated data in electronic
format facilitates review through the use of software ``search''
options, as well as the downloading and analyzing of data in
spreadsheet format. Additionally, air agencies would benefit from the
reported data being accessible to them through the EPA's electronic
reporting system wherever and whenever they want or need access (as
long as they have access to the internet). The ability to access and
review reports electronically assists air agencies in determining
compliance with applicable regulations more quickly and accurately,
potentially allowing a faster response to violations, which could
minimize harmful air emissions. This benefits both air agencies and the
general public.
    The proposed electronic reporting of test data is consistent with
electronic data trends (e.g., electronic banking and income tax
filing). Electronic reporting of environmental data is already common
practice in many media offices at the EPA. The changes being proposed
in this rulemaking are needed to continue the EPA's transition to
electronic reporting.
    Additionally, we have identified two broad circumstances in which
electronic reporting extensions may be provided. In both circumstances,
the decision to accept your claim of needing additional time to report
is within the discretion of the Administrator, and reporting should
occur as soon as possible.
    In 40 CFR 63.3000, we address the situation where an extension may
be warranted due to outages of the EPA's CDX or CEDRI which preclude
you from accessing the system and submitting required reports. If
either the CDX or CEDRI is unavailable at any time beginning 5 business
days prior to the date that the submission is due, and the
unavailability prevents you from submitting a report by the required
date, you may assert a claim of EPA system outage. We consider 5
business days prior to the reporting deadline to be an appropriate
timeframe because if the system is down prior to this time, you still
have 1 week to complete reporting once the system is back online.
However, if the CDX or CEDRI is down during the week a report is due,
we realize that this could greatly impact your ability to submit a
required report on time. We will notify you about known outages as far
in advance as possible by CHIEF Listserv notice, posting on the CEDRI
website, and posting on the CDX website so that you can plan
accordingly and still meet your reporting deadline. However, if a
planned or unplanned outage occurs and you believe that it will affect
or it has affected your ability to comply with an electronic reporting
requirement, we have provided a process to assert such a claim.
    In 40 CFR 63.3000, we address the situation where an extension may
be warranted due to a force majeure event, which is defined as an event
that will be or has been caused by circumstances beyond the control of
the affected facility, its contractors, or any entity controlled by the
affected facility that

prevents you from complying with the requirement to submit a report
electronically as required by this rule. Examples of such events are
acts of nature, acts of war or terrorism, or equipment failure or
safety hazards beyond the control of the facility. If such an event
occurs or is still occurring or if there are still lingering effects of
the event in the 5 business days prior to a submission deadline, we
have provided a process to assert a claim of force majeure.
    We are providing these potential extensions to protect you from
noncompliance in cases where you cannot successfully submit a report by
the reporting deadline for reasons outside of your control as described
above. We are not providing an extension for other instances. You
should register for CEDRI far in advance of the initial compliance
date, in order to make sure that you can complete the identity proofing
process prior to the initial compliance date. Additionally, we
recommend you start developing reports early, in case any questions
arise during the reporting process.
b. Frequency of Compliance Reports
    Section 63.3000(c) of the current rule requires owners and
operators of wet-formed fiberglass mat production facilities subject to
40 CFR part 63, subpart HHHH, to submit compliance reports on a
semiannual basis unless there are deviations from emission limits or
operating limits. In those instances, the current rule requires that
compliance reports be submitted on a quarterly basis. The EPA is
proposing to revise 40 CFR 63.3000(c) to require that compliance
reports be submitted on a semiannual basis in all instances. Reporting
on a semiannual basis will adequately provide a check on the operation
and maintenance of process, control, and monitoring equipment and
identify any problems with complying with rule requirements.
c. Parameter Monitoring and Recording During Use of Binder Containing
No HAP
    Section 63.2984 of the current rule requires owners and operators
of wet-formed fiberglass mat production facilities subject to 40 CFR
part 63, subpart HHHH to maintain the operating parameters established
during the most recent performance test. Sections 63.2996 and 63.2998
of the current rule require owners and operators to monitor and record
the parameters listed in Table 1 to subpart HHHH. The EPA is proposing
that during periods when the binder formulation being used to produce
mat does not contain any HAP (i.e., formaldehyde or any other HAP
listed under section 112(b) of the CAA), owners and operators would not
be required to monitor or record any of the parameters listed in Table
1 to 40 CFR part 63, subpart HHHH, including control device parameters.
For each of these periods, we propose that owners and operators would
be required to record the dates and times that production of mat using
a non-HAP binder began and ended. To clearly identify these periods
when the binder formulation being used to produce mat does not contain
any HAP, we are proposing revisions to 40 CFR part 63, subpart HHHH,
sections 63.2984, 63.2996, and 63.2998 and table 1, and also proposing
that a definition of Non-HAP binder be added to 40 CFR 63.3004. The new
definition of ``Non-HAP binder'' being proposed reads: ``Non-HAP binder
means a binder formulation that does not contain any hazardous air
pollutants listed on the material safety data sheets of the compounds
used in the binder formulation.''
3. Technical and Editorial Changes
    We are also proposing several clarifying revisions to the final
rule as described in Table 2 of this preamble.

 Table 2--Miscellaneous Proposed Changes to 40 CFR Part 63, Subpart HHHH
------------------------------------------------------------------------
                                               Description of proposed
          Section of subpart HHHH                      change
------------------------------------------------------------------------
40 CFR 63.2984............................   Amend paragraph
                                             (a)(4) to clarify
                                             compliance with a different
                                             operating limit means the
                                             operating limit specified
                                             in paragraph (a)(1).
                                             Amend paragraph (e)
                                             to allow use of a more
                                             recent edition of the
                                             currently referenced
                                             ``Industrial Ventilation: A
                                             Manual of Recommended
                                             Practice,'' American
                                             Conference of Governmental
                                             Industrial Hygienists,
                                             i.e., the appropriate
                                             chapters of ``Industrial
                                             Ventilation: A Manual of
                                             Recommended Practice for
                                             Design'' (27th edition), or
                                             an alternate as approved by
                                             the Administrator.
                                             Revise text
                                             regarding incorporation by
                                             reference (IBR) in
                                             paragraph (e) by replacing
                                             the reference to 40 CFR
                                             63.3003 with, instead, 40
                                             CFR 63.14.
40 CFR 63.2993............................   Amend paragraphs
                                             (a) and (b) to update a
                                             reference.
                                             Re-designate
                                             paragraph (c) as paragraph
                                             (e) and amend the newly
                                             designated paragraph to
                                             clarify that EPA Method 320
                                             (40 CFR part 63, appendix A-
                                             2) is an acceptable method
                                             for measuring the
                                             concentration of
                                             formaldehyde.
                                             Add new paragraph
                                             (c) to clarify that EPA
                                             Methods 3 and 3A (40 CFR
                                             part 60, appendix A) are
                                             acceptable methods for
                                             measuring oxygen and carbon
                                             dioxide concentrations
                                             needed to correct
                                             formaldehyde concentration
                                             measurements to a standard
                                             basis.
                                             Add new paragraph
                                             (d) to clarify that EPA
                                             Method 4 (40 CFR part 60,
                                             appendix A-3) is an
                                             acceptable method for
                                             measuring the moisture
                                             content of the stack gas.
40 CFR 63.2999............................   Amend paragraph (b)
                                             to update list of example
                                             electronic medium on which
                                             records may be kept.
                                             Add paragraph (c)
                                             to clarify that any records
                                             that are submitted
                                             electronically via the
                                             EPA's CEDRI may be
                                             maintained in electronic
                                             format.
40 CFR 63.3003............................   Remove text and
                                             reserve the section
                                             consistent with revisions
                                             to the IBR in 40 CFR 63.14.
------------------------------------------------------------------------

E. What compliance dates are we proposing?

    The EPA is proposing that existing affected sources and affected
sources that commenced construction or reconstruction on or before
April 6, 2018 must comply with all of the amendments no later than 180
days after the effective date of the final rule. (The final action is
not expected to be a ``major rule'' as defined by 5 U.S.C. 804(2), so
the effective date of the final rule will be the promulgation date as
specified in CAA section 112(d)(10)). For existing sources, we are
proposing four changes that would impact ongoing compliance
requirements for 40 CFR part 63, subpart HHHH. As discussed elsewhere
in this preamble, we are proposing to add a requirement that
performance test results be electronically submitted, we are proposing
to change the frequency of

required submissions of compliance reports for facilities with
deviations from applicable standards from a quarterly basis to a
semiannual basis, we are proposing to change the requirements for SSM
by removing the exemption from the requirements to meet the standard
during SSM periods, and we are proposing to no longer require parameter
monitoring during periods when a non-HAP binder is being used to
produce mat. Our experience with similar industries that are required
to convert reporting mechanisms to install necessary hardware and
software, become familiar with the process of submitting performance
test results electronically through the EPA's CEDRI, test these new
electronic submission capabilities, and reliably employ electronic
reporting and to convert logistics of reporting processes to different
time-reporting parameters shows that a time period of a minimum of 90
days, and, more typically, 180 days is generally necessary to
successfully accomplish these revisions. Our experience with similar
industries further shows that this sort of regulated facility generally
requires a time period of 180 days to read and understand the amended
rule requirements; to evaluate their operations to ensure that they can
meet the standards during periods of startup and shutdown as defined in
the rule and make any necessary adjustments; to adjust parameter
monitoring and recording systems to accommodate revisions such as those
proposed here for periods of non-HAP binder use; and to update their
operation, maintenance, and monitoring plan to reflect the revised
requirements. The EPA recognizes the confusion that multiple different
compliance dates for individual requirements would create and the
additional burden such an assortment of dates would impose. From our
assessment of the timeframe needed for compliance with the entirety of
the revised requirements, the EPA considers a period of 180 days to be
the most expeditious compliance period practicable and, thus, is
proposing that existing affected sources be in compliance with all of
this regulation's revised requirements within 180 days of the
regulation's effective date. We solicit comment on this proposed
compliance period, and we specifically request submission of
information from sources in this source category regarding specific
actions that would need to be undertaken to comply with the proposed
amended requirements and the time needed to make the adjustments for
compliance with any of the revised requirements. We note that
information provided may result in changes to the proposed compliance
date. Affected sources that commence construction or reconstruction
after April 6, 2018 must comply with all requirements of the subpart,
including the amendments being proposed, no later than the effective
date of the final rule or upon startup, whichever is later. All
affected facilities would have to continue to meet the current
requirements of 40 CFR part 63, subpart HHHH until the applicable
compliance date of the amended rule.

V. Summary of Cost, Environmental, and Economic Impacts

A. What are the affected sources?

    The EPA estimates that there are seven wet-formed fiberglass mat
production facilities that are subject to the Wet-Formed Fiberglass Mat
Production NESHAP and would be affected by the proposed amendments. The
bases of our estimate of affected facilities are provided in the
memorandum, Wet-Formed Fiberglass: Residual Risk Modeling File
Documentation (Modeling File Documentation Memo), which is available in
the docket for this action. We are not currently aware of any planned
or potential new or reconstructed wet-formed fiberglass mat production
facilities.

B. What are the air quality impacts?

    The EPA estimates that annual HAP emissions from the seven wet-
formed fiberglass mat production facilities that are subject to the
NESHAP are approximately 23 tpy. Because we are not proposing revisions
to the emission limits, we do not anticipate any air quality impacts as
a result of the proposed amendments.

C. What are the cost impacts?

    The seven wet-formed fiberglass mat production facilities that
would be subject to the proposed amendments would incur minimal net
costs to meet revised recordkeeping and reporting requirements, some
estimated to have costs and some estimated to have cost savings.
Nationwide annual costs associated with the proposed requirements are
estimated to be $200 per year in each of the 3 years following
promulgation of amendments. The EPA believes that the seven wet-formed
fiberglass mat production facilities which are known to be subject to
the NESHAP can meet the proposed requirements without incurring
additional capital or operational costs. Therefore, the only costs
associated with the proposed amendments are related to recordkeeping
and reporting labor costs. For further information on the requirements
being proposed, see section IV of this preamble. For further
information on the costs and cost savings associated with the
requirements being proposed, see the memorandum, Cost Impacts of Wet-
Formed Fiberglass Mat Production Risk and Technology Review Proposal,
and the document, Supporting Statement for NESHAP for Wet-Formed
Fiberglass Mat Production, which are both available in the docket for
this action. We solicit comment on these estimated cost impacts.

D. What are the economic impacts?

    As noted earlier, the nationwide annual costs associated with the
proposed requirements are estimated to be $200 per year in each of the
3 years following promulgation of the amendments. The present value of
the total cost over these 3 years is approximately $550 in 2016 dollars
under a 3-percent discount rate, and $510 in 2016 dollars under a 7-
percent discount rate. These costs are not expected to result in
business closures, significant price increases, or substantial profit
loss.
    For further information on the economic impacts associated with the
requirements being proposed, see the memorandum, Proposal Economic
Impact Analysis for the Risk and Technology Review: Wet-Formed
Fiberglass Mat Production Source Category, which is available in the
docket for this action.

E. What are the benefits?

    Although the EPA does not anticipate reductions in HAP emissions as
a result of the proposed amendments, we believe that the action, if
finalized, would result in improvements to the rule. Specifically, the
proposed amendment requiring electronic submittal of performance test
results will increase the usefulness of the data, is in keeping with
current trends of data availability, will further assist in the
protection of public health and the environment, and will ultimately
result in less burden on the regulated community. In addition, the
proposed amendments reducing parameter monitoring and recording
requirements when non-HAP binder is being used to produce mat and
reducing frequency of compliance reports will reduce burden for
regulated facilities while continuing to protect public health and the
environment. See section IV.D.2 of this preamble for more information.

VI. Request for Comments

    We solicit comments on all aspects of this proposed action. In
addition to general comments on this proposed action, we are also
interested in additional data that may improve the risk assessments and
other analyses. We are specifically interested in receiving any
improvements to the data used in the site-specific emissions profiles
used for risk modeling. Such data should include supporting
documentation in sufficient detail to allow characterization of the
quality and representativeness of the data or information. Section VII
of this preamble provides more information on submitting data.
    We specifically solicit comment on an additional issue under
consideration that would reduce regulatory burden for owner/operators
of certain drying and curing ovens. We are requesting comment on
exempting performance testing requirements for drying and curing ovens
that are subject to a federally enforceable permit requiring the use of
only non-HAP binders. 40 CFR 63.2991 currently requires formaldehyde
testing for all drying and curing ovens subject to 40 CFR part 63,
subpart HHHH, even if the facility only uses a non-HAP binder. Such an
exemption would reduce burden for owners and operators that have
switched to using only non-HAP binders without any increase in HAP
emissions. Owners and operators of drying and curing ovens that are
still permitted to use HAP containing binders would still be required
to conduct periodic performance testing even if they are not currently
using binders that contain HAP.

VII. Submitting Data Corrections

    The site-specific emissions profiles used in the source category
risk and demographic analyses and instructions are available for
download on the RTR website at https://www3.epa.gov/airtoxics/rrisk/rtrpg.html. The data files include detailed information for each HAP
emissions release point for the facilities in the source category.
    If you believe that the data are not representative or are
inaccurate, please identify the data in question, provide your reason
for concern, and provide any ``improved'' data that you have, if
available. When you submit data, we request that you provide
documentation of the basis for the revised values to support your
suggested changes. To submit comments on the data downloaded from the
RTR website, complete the following steps:
    1. Within this downloaded file, enter suggested revisions to the
data fields appropriate for that information.
    2. Fill in the commenter information fields for each suggested
revision (i.e., commenter name, commenter organization, commenter email
address, commenter phone number, and revision comments).
    3. Gather documentation for any suggested emissions revisions
(e.g., performance test reports, material balance calculations).
    4. Send the entire downloaded file with suggested revisions in
Microsoft[supreg] Access format and all accompanying documentation to
Docket ID No. EPA-HQ-OAR-2004-0309 (through the method described in the
ADDRESSES section of this preamble).
    5. If you are providing comments on a single facility or multiple
facilities, you need only submit one file for all facilities. The file
should contain all suggested changes for all sources at that facility
(or facilities). We request that all data revision comments be
submitted in the form of updated Microsoft[supreg] Excel files that are
generated by the Microsoft[supreg] Access file. These files are
provided on the RTR website at https://www3.epa.gov/airtoxics/rrisk/rtrpg.html.

VIII. Statutory and Executive Order Reviews

    Additional information about these statutes and Executive Orders
can be found at http://www2.epa.gov/laws-regulations/laws-and-executive-orders.

A. Executive Order 12866: Regulatory Planning and Review and Executive
Order 13563: Improving Regulation and Regulatory Review

    This action is not a significant regulatory action and was,
therefore, not submitted to OMB for review.

B. Executive Order 13771: Reducing Regulation and Controlling
Regulatory Costs

    This action is not expected to be an Executive Order 13771
regulatory action because this action is not significant under
Executive Order 12866.

C. Paperwork Reduction Act (PRA)

    The information collection activities in this proposed rule have
been submitted for approval to OMB under the PRA. The ICR document that
the EPA prepared has been assigned EPA ICR number 1964.08. You can find
a copy of the ICR in the docket for this rule, and it is briefly
summarized here.
    We are proposing changes to the recordkeeping and reporting
requirements associated with 40 CFR part 63, subpart HHHH, in the form
of eliminating the SSM plan and reporting requirements; requiring
electronic submittal of performance test reports; reducing the
frequency of compliance reports to a semiannual basis when there are
deviations from applicable standards; and reducing the parameter
monitoring and recording requirements during use of binder containing
no HAP. We also included review of the amended rule by affected
facilities in the updated ICR for this proposed rule. In addition, the
number of facilities subject to the standards changed. The number of
respondents was reduced from 14 to 7 based on consultation with
industry representatives and state/local agencies.
    Respondents/affected entities: The respondents to the recordkeeping
and reporting requirements are owners or operators of facilities that
produce wet-formed fiberglass mat subject to 40 CFR part 63, subpart
HHHH.
    Respondent's obligation to respond: Mandatory (40 CFR part 63,
subpart HHHH).
    Estimated number of respondents: Seven.
    Frequency of response: The frequency of responses varies depending
on the burden item. Responses include one-time review of rule
amendments, reports of periodic performance tests, and semiannual
compliance reports.
    Total estimated burden: The annual recordkeeping and reporting
burden for responding facilities to comply with all of the requirements
in the NESHAP, averaged over the 3 years of this ICR, is estimated to
be 1,470 hours (per year). Of these, 3 hours (per year) is the
incremental burden to comply with the proposed rule amendments. Burden
is defined at 5 CFR 1320.3(b).
    Total estimated cost: The annual recordkeeping and reporting cost
for responding facilities to comply with all of the requirements in the
NESHAP, averaged over the 3 years of this ICR, is estimated to be
$95,500 (per year), including $0 annualized capital or operation and
maintenance costs. Of the total, $200 (per year) is the incremental
cost to comply with the proposed amendments to the rule.
    An agency may not conduct or sponsor, and a person is not required
to respond to, a collection of information unless it displays a
currently valid OMB control number. The OMB control numbers for the
EPA's regulations in 40 CFR are listed in 40 CFR part 9.
    Submit your comments on the Agency's need for this information, the
accuracy of the provided burden estimates, and any suggested methods
for minimizing respondent burden to

the EPA using the docket identified at the beginning of this rule. You
may also send your ICR-related comments to OMB's Office of Information
and Regulatory Affairs via email to [email protected],
Attention: Desk Officer for the EPA. Since OMB is required to make a
decision concerning the ICR between 30 and 60 days after receipt, OMB
must receive comments no later than May 7, 2018. The EPA will respond
to any ICR-related comments in the final rule.

D. Regulatory Flexibility Act (RFA)

    I certify that this action will not have a significant economic
impact on a substantial number of small entities under the RFA. This
action will not impose any requirements on small entities. There are no
small entities affected in this regulated industry. See the document,
Proposal Economic Impact Analysis for the Reconsideration of the Risk
and Technology Review: Wet-Formed Fiberglass Mat Production Source
Category, available in the docket for this action.

E. Unfunded Mandates Reform Act (UMRA)

    This action does not contain an unfunded mandate of $100 million or
more as described in UMRA, 2 U.S.C. 1531-1538, and does not
significantly or uniquely affect small governments. The action imposes
no enforceable duty on any state, local, or tribal governments or the
private sector.

F. Executive Order 13132: Federalism

    This action does not have federalism implications. It will not have
substantial direct effects on the states, on the relationship between
the national government and the states, or on the distribution of power
and responsibilities among the various levels of government.

G. Executive Order 13175: Consultation and Coordination With Indian
Tribal Governments

    This action does not have tribal implications as specified in
Executive Order 13175. None of the seven wet-formed fiberglass mat
production facilities that have been identified as being affected by
this proposed action are owned or operated by tribal governments or
located within tribal lands. Thus, Executive Order 13175 does not apply
to this action.

H. Executive Order 13045: Protection of Children From Environmental
Health Risks and Safety Risks

    This action is not subject to Executive Order 13045 because it is
not economically significant as defined in Executive Order 12866, and
because the EPA does not believe the environmental health or safety
risks addressed by this action present a disproportionate risk to
children. This action's health and risk assessments are contained in
sections III.A and C and sections IV.A and B of this preamble, and
further documented in the risk report, Residual Risk Assessment for the
Wet-Formed Fiberglass Mat Production Source Category in Support of the
February 2018 Risk and Technology Review Proposed Rule, available in
the docket for this action.

I. Executive Order 13211: Actions Concerning Regulations That
Significantly Affect Energy Supply, Distribution, or Use

    This action is not subject to Executive Order 13211 because it is
not a significant regulatory action under Executive Order 12866.

J. National Technology Transfer and Advancement Act (NTTAA) and 1 CFR
part 51

    This action involves technical standards. Therefore, the EPA
conducted a search to identify potentially applicable voluntary
consensus standards (VCS). The EPA proposes to use EPA Methods 1, 2, 3,
3A, 4, 316, 318, and 320 of 40 CFR part 60, appendix A. While the EPA
identified 11 VCS as being potentially applicable as alternatives to
EPA Methods 1, 2, 3, 3A, and 4 of 40 CFR part 60, the Agency does not
propose to use them. Use of these VCS would be impractical because of
their lack of equivalency, documentation, validation data, and/or other
important technical and policy considerations. Results of the search
are documented in the memorandum, Voluntary Consensus Standard Results
for National Emission Standards for Hazardous Air Pollutants for Wet-
formed Fiberglass Mat Production, which is available in the docket for
this action. Methods 316, 318, and 320 of 40 CFR part 60, appendix A
are used to determine the formaldehyde concentrations before and after
the control device (e.g., thermal oxidizer). Methods 1, 2, 3, 3A, and 4
of 40 CFR part 60, appendix A are used the determine the gas flow rate
which is used with the concentration of formaldehyde to calculate the
mass emission rate. Additional information can be found at https://www.epa.gov/emc/emc-promulgated-test-methods.
    Industrial Ventilation: A Manual of Recommended Practice, 23rd
Edition, 1998, Chapter 3, ``Local Exhaust Hoods'' and Chapter 5,
``Exhaust System Design Procedure,'' and Industrial Ventilation: A
Manual of Recommended Practice for Design, 27th Edition, 2010, are
compilations of research data and information on design, maintenance,
and evaluation of industrial exhaust ventilation systems. They include
suggestions for appropriate hood design considerations and aspects for
fan design. The Manuals are used by engineers and industrial hygienists
as guidance for design and evaluation of industrial ventilation
systems. Additional information can be found at https://www.acgih.org.

K. Executive Order 12898: Federal Actions To Address Environmental
Justice in Minority Populations and Low-Income Populations

    The EPA believes that this action does not have disproportionately
high and adverse human health or environmental effects on minority
populations, low-income populations, and/or indigenous peoples, as
specified in Executive Order 12898 (59 FR 7629, February 16, 1994).
    The documentation for this decision is contained in section IV.A of
this preamble and the technical report, Risk and Technology Review
Analysis of Demographic Factors for Populations Living Near Wet-Formed
Fiberglass Mat Production, available in the docket for this action.

List of Subjects in 40 CFR Part 63

    Environmental protection, Administrative practice and procedure,
Air pollution control, Hazardous substances, Incorporation by
reference, Intergovernmental relations, Reporting and recordkeeping
requirements.

    Dated: March 19, 2018.
E. Scott Pruitt,
Administrator.

    For the reasons stated in the preamble, the EPA proposes to amend
title 40, chapter I, part 63 of the Code of Federal Regulations as
follows:

PART 63--NATIONAL EMISSION STANDARDS FOR HAZARDOUS AIR POLLUTANTS
FOR SOURCE CATEGORIES

0
1. The authority citation for part 63 continues to read as follows:

    Authority:  42 U.S.C. 7401, et seq.

Subpart A--General Provisions

0
2. Section 63.14 is amended by revising the last sentence of paragraph
(a) and paragraphs (b)(2) and (3) to read as follows:

Sec.  63.14   Incorporations by reference.

    (a) * * * For information on the availability of this material at
NARA, call<PHONE_NUMBER> or go to http://www.archives.gov/federal-register/cfr/ibr-locations.html.
    (b) * * *
    (2) Industrial Ventilation: A Manual of Recommended Practice, 23rd
Edition, 1998, Chapter 3, ``Local Exhaust Hoods'' and Chapter 5,
``Exhaust System Design Procedure.'' IBR approved for Sec. Sec.
63.1503, 63.1506(c), 63.1512(e), Table 2 to Subpart RRR, Table 3 to
Subpart RRR, Appendix A to Subpart RRR, and 63.2984(e).
    (3) Industrial Ventilation: A Manual of Recommended Practice for
Design, 27th Edition, 2010. IBR approved for Sec. Sec.  63.1503,
63.1506(c), 63.1512(e), Table 2 to Subpart RRR, Table 3 to Subpart RRR,
Appendix A to Subpart RRR, and 63.2984(e).
* * * * *

Subpart HHHH--National Emission Standards for Hazardous Air
Pollutants for Wet-Formed Fiberglass Mat Production

0
3. Section 63.2984 is amended by revising paragraphs (a)(1), (4), (b),
and (e) to read as follows:

Sec.  63.2984   What operating limits must I meet?

    (a) * * *
    (1) You must operate the thermal oxidizer so that the average
operating temperature in any 3-hour block period does not fall below
the temperature established during your performance test and specified
in your OMM plan, except during periods when using a non-HAP binder.
* * * * *
    (4) If you use an add-on control device other than a thermal
oxidizer or wish to monitor an alternative parameter and comply with a
different operating limit than the limit specified in paragraph (a)(1)
of this section, you must obtain approval for the alternative
monitoring under Sec.  63.8(f). You must include the approved
alternative monitoring and operating limits in the OMM plan specified
in Sec.  63.2987.
    (b) When during a period of normal operation, you detect that an
operating parameter deviates from the limit or range established in
paragraph (a) of this section, you must initiate corrective actions
within 1 hour according to the provisions of your OMM plan. The
corrective actions must be completed in an expeditious manner as
specified in the OMM plan.
* * * * *
    (e) If you use a thermal oxidizer or other control device to
achieve the emission limits in Sec.  63.2983, you must capture and
convey the formaldehyde emissions from each drying and curing oven
according to the procedures in chapters 3 and 5 of ``Industrial
Ventilation: A Manual of Recommended Practice'' (23rd Edition) or the
appropriate chapters of ``Industrial Ventilation: A Manual of
Recommended Practice for Design'' (27th edition) (both incorporated by
reference, see Sec.  63.14). In addition, you may use an alternate as
approved by the Administrator.
0
4. Section 63.2985 is amended by revising paragraph (b) and adding
paragraph (d) to read as follows:

Sec.  63.2985   When do I have to comply with these standards?

* * * * *
    (b) Drying and curing ovens constructed or reconstructed after May
26, 2000 and before April 9, 2018 must be in compliance with this
subpart at startup or by April 11, 2002, whichever is later.
* * * * *
    (d) Drying and curing ovens constructed or reconstructed after
April 6, 2018 must be in compliance with this subpart at startup or by
[DATE OF PUBLICATION OF FINAL RULE IN THE Federal Register], whichever
is later.
0
5. Section 63.2986 is amended by revising paragraph (g) to read as
follows:

Sec.  63.2986   How do I comply with the standards?

* * * * *
    (g) You must comply with the requirements in paragraphs (g)(1)
through (3) of this section.
    (1) Before [DATE 181 DAYS AFTER PUBLICATION OF FINAL RULE IN THE
Federal Register], you must be in compliance with the emission limits
in Sec.  63.2983 and the operating limits in Sec.  63.2984 at all
times, except during periods of startup, shutdown, or malfunction.
After [DATE 180 DAYS AFTER PUBLICATION OF FINAL RULE IN THE Federal
Register], you must be in compliance with the emission limits in Sec.
63.2983 and the operating limits in Sec.  63.2984 at all times.
    (2) Before [DATE 181 DAYS AFTER PUBLICATION OF FINAL RULE IN THE
Federal Register], you must always operate and maintain any affected
source, including air pollution control equipment and monitoring
equipment, according to the provisions in Sec.  63.6(e)(1). After [DATE
180 DAYS AFTER PUBLICATION OF FINAL RULE IN THE Federal Register], at
all times, you must operate and maintain any affected source, including
associated air pollution control equipment and monitoring equipment, in
a manner consistent with safety and good air pollution control
practices for minimizing emissions. The general duty to minimize
emissions does not require you to make any further efforts to reduce
emissions if levels required by the applicable standard have been
achieved. Determination of whether a source is operating in compliance
with operation and maintenance requirements will be based on
information available to the Administrator which may include, but is
not limited to, monitoring results, review of operation and maintenance
procedures, review of operation and maintenance records, and inspection
of the source.
    (3) Before [DATE 181 DAYS AFTER PUBLICATION OF FINAL RULE IN THE
Federal Register], you must develop a written startup, shutdown, and
malfunction plan according to the provisions in Sec.  63.6(e)(3). The
startup, shutdown, and malfunction plan must address the startup,
shutdown, and corrective actions taken for malfunctioning process and
air pollution control equipment. A startup, shutdown, and malfunction
plan is not required after [DATE 180 DAYS AFTER PUBLICATION OF FINAL
RULE IN THE Federal Register].
0
6. Section 63.2992 is amended by revising paragraphs (b) and (e) to
read as follows:

Sec.  63.2992   How do I conduct a performance test?

* * * * *
    (b) You must conduct the performance test according to the
requirements in Sec.  63.7(a) through (d), (e)(2) through (4), and (f)
through (h).
* * * * *
    (e) Performance tests must be conducted under such conditions as
the Administrator specifies to you based on representative performance
of the affected source for the period being tested. Representative
conditions exclude periods of startup and shutdown. You may not conduct
performance tests during periods of malfunction. You must record the
process information that is necessary to document operating conditions
during the test and include in such record an explanation to support
that such conditions represent normal operation. Upon request, you must
make available to the Administrator such records as may be necessary to
determine the conditions of performance tests
* * * * *
0
7. Section 63.2993 is amended by:

0
a. Revising paragraphs (a) and (b);
0
b. Redesignating paragraphs (c) through (e) as paragraphs (e) through
(g);
0
c. Adding new paragraphs (c) and (d); and
0
d. Revising newly redesignated paragraph (e).
    The revisions and additions read as follows:

Sec.  63.2993   What test methods must I use in conducting performance
tests?

    (a) Use EPA Method 1 (40 CFR part 60, appendix A-1) for selecting
the sampling port location and the number of sampling ports.
    (b) Use EPA Method 2 (40 CFR part 60, appendix A-1) for measuring
the volumetric flow rate of the stack gas.
    (c) Use EPA Method 3 or 3A (40 CFR part 60, appendix A-2) for
measuring oxygen and carbon dioxide concentrations needed to correct
formaldehyde concentration measurements to a standard basis.
    (d) Use EPA Method 4 (40 CFR part 60, appendix A-3) for measuring
the moisture content of the stack gas.
    (e) Use EPA Method 316, 318, or 320 (40 CFR part 63, appendix A)
for measuring the concentration of formaldehyde.
* * * * *
0
8. Section 63.2994 is amended by revising paragraph (a) to read as
follows:

Sec.  63.2994   How do I verify the performance of monitoring
equipment?

    (a) Before conducting the performance test, you must take the steps
listed in paragraphs (a)(1) through (3) of this section:
    (1) Install and calibrate all process equipment, control devices,
and monitoring equipment.
    (2) Develop and implement a continuous monitoring system (CMS)
quality control program that includes written procedures for CMS
according to Sec.  63.8(d)(1) and (2). You must keep these written
procedures on record for the life of the affected source or until the
affected source is no longer subject to the provisions of this part, to
be made available for inspection, upon request, by the Administrator.
If the performance evaluation plan is revised, you must keep previous
(i.e., superseded) versions of the performance evaluation plan on
record to be made available for inspection, upon request, by the
Administrator, for a period of 5 years after each revision to the plan.
The program of corrective action should be included in the plan
required under Sec.  63.8(d)(2).
    (3) Conduct a performance evaluation of the CMS according to Sec.
63.8(e), which specifies the general requirements and requirements for
notifications, the site-specific performance evaluation plan, conduct
of the performance evaluation, and reporting of performance evaluation
results.
* * * * *
0
9. Section 63.2996 is revised to read as follows:

Sec.  63.2996   What must I monitor?

    (a) You must monitor the parameters listed in table 1 of this
subpart and any other parameters specified in your OMM plan. The
parameters must be monitored, at a minimum, at the corresponding
frequencies listed in table 1 of this subpart, except as specified in
paragraph (b) of this section.
    (b) During periods when using a non-HAP binder, you are not
required to monitor the parameters in table 1 of this subpart.
0
10. Section 63.2998 is amended by:
0
a. Revising the introductory text, paragraphs (a) and (c), and
paragraph (e) introductory text;
0
b. Revising paragraph (f);
0
c. Redesignating paragraph (g) as paragraph (h)
0
d. Adding new paragraph (g).
    The revisions read as follows:

Sec.  63.2998   What records must I maintain?

    You must maintain records according to the procedures of Sec.
63.10. You must maintain the records listed in paragraphs (a) through
(h) of this section.
    (a) All records required by Sec.  63.10, where applicable. Table 2
of this subpart presents the applicable requirements of the general
provisions.
* * * * *
    (c) During periods when the binder formulation being applied
contains HAP, records of values of monitored parameters listed in Table
1 of this subpart to show continuous compliance with each operating
limit specified in Table 1 of this subpart. During periods when using
non-HAP binder, and that you elect not to monitor the parameters in
table 1 of this subpart, you are required to record the dates and times
that production of mat using non-HAP binder began and ended.
* * * * *
    (e) Before [DATE 181 DAYS AFTER PUBLICATION OF FINAL RULE IN THE
Federal Register], if an operating parameter deviation occurs, you must
record:
* * * * *
    (f) Before [DATE 181 DAYS AFTER PUBLICATION OF FINAL RULE IN THE
Federal Register], keep all records specified in Sec.  63.6(e)(3)(iii)
through (v) related to startup, shutdown, and malfunction.
    (g) After [DATE 180 DAYS AFTER PUBLICATION OF FINAL RULE IN THE
Federal Register], in the event that an affected source fails to meet
an applicable standard, including deviations from an emission limit in
Sec.  63.2983 or an operating limit in Sec.  63.2984, you must record
the number of failures and, for each failure, you must:
    (1) Record the date, time, and duration of the failure;
    (2) Describe the cause of the failure;
    (3) Record and retain a list of the affected sources or equipment,
an estimate of the quantity of each regulated pollutant emitted over
any emission limit and a description of the method used to estimate the
emissions; and
    (4) Record actions taken to minimize emissions in accordance with
Sec.  63.2986(g)(2), and any corrective actions taken to return the
affected unit to its normal or usual manner of operation and/or the
operating parameter to the limit or to within the range specified in
the OMM plan, along with dates and times at which corrective actions
were initiated and completed.
* * * * *
0
10. Section 63.2999 is amended by revising paragraph (b) and adding
paragraph (c) to read as follows:

Sec.  63.2999   In what form and for how long must I maintain records?

* * * * *
    (b) Your records must be readily available and in a form so they
can be easily inspected and reviewed. You can keep the records on paper
or an alternative medium, such as microfilm, computer, computer disks,
compact disk, digital versatile disk, flash drive, other commonly used
electronic storage medium, magnetic tape, or on microfiche.
    (c) Any records required to be maintained by this part that are
submitted electronically via the EPA's Compliance and Emissions Data
Reporting Interface (CEDRI) may be maintained in electronic format.
This ability to maintain electronic copies does not affect the
requirement for facilities to make records, data, and reports available
upon request to a delegated air agency or the EPA as part of an on-site
compliance evaluation.
0
11. Section 63.3000 is amended by revising paragraphs (c) introductory
text, (1), (4), (5), (d), and (e) and adding paragraphs (c)(6), (f),
and (g) to read as follows:

Sec.  63.3000  What notifications and reports must I submit?

* * * * *
    (c) Semiannual compliance reports. You must submit semiannual
compliance reports according to the requirements of paragraphs (c)(1)
through (6) of this section.
    (1) Dates for submitting reports. Unless the Administrator has
agreed to a different schedule for submitting reports under Sec.
63.10(a), you must deliver or postmark each semiannual compliance
report no later than 30 days following the end of each semiannual
reporting period. The first semiannual reporting period begins on the
compliance date for your affected source and ends on June 30 or
December 31, whichever date immediately follows your compliance date.
Each subsequent semiannual reporting period for which you must submit a
semiannual compliance report begins on July 1 or January 1 and ends 6
calendar months later. Before [DATE 1 DAY AFTER PUBLICATION OF FINAL
RULE IN THE Federal Register], as required by Sec.  63.10(e)(3), you
must begin submitting quarterly compliance reports if you deviate from
the emission limits in Sec.  63.2983 or the operating limits in Sec.
63.2984. After [DATE OF PUBLICATION OF FINAL RULE IN THE Federal
Register], quarterly compliance reports are not required.
* * * * *
    (4) No deviations. If there were no instances where an affected
source failed to meet an applicable standard, including no deviations
from the emission limit in Sec.  63.2983 or the operating limits in
Sec.  63.2984, the semiannual compliance report must include a
statement to that effect. If there were no periods during which the
continuous parameter monitoring systems were out-of-control as
specified in Sec.  63.8(c)(7), the semiannual compliance report must
include a statement to that effect.
    (5) Deviations. Before [DATE 181 DAYS AFTER PUBLICATION OF FINAL
RULE IN THE Federal Register], if there was an instance where an
affected source failed to meet an applicable standard, including a
deviation from the emission limit in Sec.  63.2983 or an operating
limit in Sec.  63.2984, the semiannual compliance report must record
the number of failures and contain the information in paragraphs
(c)(5)(i) through (ix) of this section:
    (i) The date, time, and duration of each failure.
    (ii) The date and time that each continuous parameter monitoring
system was inoperative, except for zero (low-level) and high-level
checks.
    (iii) The date, time, and duration that each continuous parameter
monitoring system was out-of-control, including the information in
Sec.  63.8(c)(8).
    (iv) A list of the affected sources or equipment, an estimate of
the quantity of each regulated pollutant emitted over any emission
limit and a description of the method used to estimate the emissions.
    (v) The date and time that corrective actions were taken, a
description of the cause of the failure, and a description of the
corrective actions taken.
    (vi) A summary of the total duration of each failure during the
semiannual reporting period and the total duration as a percent of the
total source operating time during that semiannual reporting period.
    (vii) A breakdown of the total duration of the failures during the
semiannual reporting period into those that were due to control
equipment problems, process problems, other known causes, and other
unknown causes.
    (viii) A brief description of the process units.
    (ix) A brief description of the continuous parameter monitoring
system.
    (6) Deviations. After [DATE 180 DAYS AFTER PUBLICATION OF FINAL
RULE IN THE Federal Register], if there was an instance where an
affected source failed to meet an applicable standard, including a
deviation from the emission limit in Sec.  63.2983 or an operating
limit in Sec.  63.2984, the semiannual compliance report must record
the number of failures and contain the information in paragraphs
(c)(5)(i) through (ix) of this section:
    (i) The date, time, and duration of each failure.
    (ii) The date and time that each continuous parameter monitoring
system was inoperative, except for zero (low-level) and high-level
checks.
    (iii) The date, time, and duration that each continuous parameter
monitoring system was out-of-control, including the information in
Sec.  63.8(c)(8).
    (iv) A list of the affected sources or equipment, an estimate of
the quantity of each regulated pollutant emitted over any emission
limit and a description of the method used to estimate the emissions.
    (v) The date and time that corrective actions were taken, a
description of the cause of the failure, and a description of the
corrective actions taken.
    (vi) A summary of the total duration of each failure during the
semiannual reporting period and the total duration as a percent of the
total source operating time during that semiannual reporting period.
    (vii) A breakdown of the total duration of the failures during the
semiannual reporting period into those that were due to control
equipment problems, process problems, other known causes, and other
unknown causes.
    (viii) A brief description of the process units.
    (ix) A brief description of the continuous parameter monitoring
system.
    (d) Performance test results. You must submit results of each
performance test (as defined in Sec.  63.2) required by this subpart no
later than 60 days after completing the test as specified in Sec.
63.10(d)(2). You must include the values measured during the
performance test for the parameters listed in Table 1 of this subpart
and the operating limits or ranges to be included in your OMM plan. For
the thermal oxidizer temperature, you must include 15-minute averages
and the average for the three 1-hour test runs. Beginning no later than
[DATE 180 DAYS AFTER PUBLICATION OF FINAL RULE IN THE Federal
Register], you must submit the results following the procedures
specified in paragraphs (d)(1) through (3) of this section.
    (1) For data collected using test methods supported by the EPA's
Electronic Reporting Tool (ERT) as listed on the EPA's ERT website
(https://www.epa.gov/electronic-reporting-air-emissions/electronic-reporting-tool-ert) at the time of the test, you must submit the
results of the performance test to the EPA via CEDRI. (CEDRI can be
accessed through the EPA's Central Data Exchange (CDX) (https://cdx.epa.gov/).) Performance test data must be submitted in a file
format generated through the use of the EPA's ERT or an alternate
electronic file format consistent with the extensible markup language
(XML) schema listed on the EPA's ERT website.
    (2) For data collected using test methods that are not supported by
the EPA's ERT as listed on the EPA's ERT website at the time of the
test, you must submit the results of the performance test to the
Administrator at the appropriate address listed in Sec.  63.13, unless
the Administrator agrees to or specifies an alternate reporting method.
    (3) If you claim that some of the performance test information
being submitted under paragraph (d)(1) is confidential business
information (CBI), you must submit a complete file generated through
the use of the EPA's

ERT or an alternate electronic file consistent with the XML schema
listed on the EPA's ERT website, including information claimed to be
CBI, on a compact disc, flash drive or other commonly used electronic
storage medium to the EPA. The electronic medium must be clearly marked
as CBI and mailed to U.S. EPA/OAQPS/CORE CBI Office, Attention: Group
Leader, Measurement Policy Group, Mail Drop C404-02, 4930 Old Page Rd.,
Durham, NC 27703. The same ERT or alternate file with the CBI omitted
must be submitted to the EPA via the EPA's CDX as described in
paragraph (d)(1) of this section.
    (e) Startup, shutdown, malfunction reports. Before [DATE 181 DAYS
AFTER PUBLICATION OF FINAL RULE IN THE Federal Register], if you have a
startup, shutdown, or malfunction during the semiannual reporting
period, you must submit the reports specified Sec.  63.10(d)(5).
    (f) If you are required to electronically submit a report through
the CEDRI in the EPA's CDX, and due to a planned or actual outage of
either the EPA's CEDRI or CDX systems within the period of time
beginning 5 business days prior to the date that the submission is due,
you will be or are precluded from accessing CEDRI or CDX and submitting
a required report within the time prescribed, you may assert a claim of
EPA system outage for failure to timely comply with the reporting
requirement. You must submit notification to the Administrator in
writing as soon as possible following the date you first knew, or
through due diligence should have known, that the event may cause or
caused a delay in reporting. You must provide to the Administrator a
written description identifying the date, time and length of the
outage; a rationale for attributing the delay in reporting beyond the
regulatory deadline to the EPA system outage; describe the measures
taken or to be taken to minimize the delay in reporting; and identify a
date by which you propose to report, or if you have already met the
reporting requirement at the time of the notification, the date you
reported. In any circumstance, the report must be submitted
electronically as soon as possible after the outage is resolved. The
decision to accept the claim of EPA system outage and allow an
extension to the reporting deadline is solely within the discretion of
the Administrator.
    (g) If you are required to electronically submit a report through
CEDRI in the EPA's CDX and a force majeure event is about to occur,
occurs, or has occurred or there are lingering effects from such an
event within the period of time beginning 5 business days prior to the
date the submission is due, the owner or operator may assert a claim of
force majeure for failure to timely comply with the reporting
requirement. For the purposes of this section, a force majeure event is
defined as an event that will be or has been caused by circumstances
beyond the control of the affected facility, its contractors, or any
entity controlled by the affected facility that prevents you from
complying with the requirement to submit a report electronically within
the time period prescribed. Examples of such events are acts of nature
(e.g., hurricanes, earthquakes, or floods), acts of war or terrorism,
or equipment failure or safety hazard beyond the control of the
affected facility (e.g., large scale power outage). If you intend to
assert a claim of force majeure, you must submit notification to the
Administrator in writing as soon as possible following the date you
first knew, or through due diligence should have known, that the event
may cause or caused a delay in reporting. You must provide to the
Administrator a written description of the force majeure event and a
rationale for attributing the delay in reporting beyond the regulatory
deadline to the force majeure event; describe the measures taken or to
be taken to minimize the delay in reporting; and identify a date by
which you propose to report, or if you have already met the reporting
requirement at the time of the notification, the date you reported. In
any circumstance, the reporting must occur as soon as possible after
the force majeure event occurs. The decision to accept the claim of
force majeure and allow an extension to the reporting deadline is
solely within the discretion of the Administrator.
0
12. Section 63.3003 is removed and reserved.
0
13. Section 63.3004 is amended by removing the definition for
``Deviation'' and adding definitions for ``Deviation after,''
``Deviation before,'' ``Non-HAP binder,'' ``Shutdown,'' and ``Startup''
in alphabetical order to read as follows:

Sec.  63.3004  What definitions apply to this subpart?

* * * * *
    Deviation after [DATE 180 DAYS AFTER PUBLICATION OF FINAL RULE IN
THE Federal Register] means any instance in which an affected source
subject to this subpart, or an owner or operator of such a source:
    (1) Fails to meet any requirement or obligation established by this
subpart, including, but not limited to, any emission limit, operating
limit, or work practice standard; or
    (2) fails to meet any term or condition that is adopted to
implement an applicable requirement in this subpart and that is
included in the operating permit for any affected source required to
obtain such a permit.
    Deviation after [DATE 181 DAYS AFTER PUBLICATION OF FINAL RULE IN
THE Federal Register] means any instance in which an affected source
subject to this subpart, or an owner or operator of such a source:
    (1) Fails to meet any requirement or obligation established by this
subpart, including, but not limited to, any emission limit, operating
limit, or work practice standard; or
    (2) fails to meet any term or condition that is adopted to
implement an applicable requirement in this subpart and that is
included in the operating permit for any affected source required to
obtain such a permit; or
    (3) fails to meet any emission limit, or operating limit, or work
practice standard in this subpart during startup, shutdown, or
malfunction, regardless of whether or not such failure is permitted by
this subpart.
* * * * *
    Non-HAP binder means a binder formulation that does not contain any
hazardous air pollutants listed on the material safety data sheets of
the compounds used in the binder formulation.
* * * * *
    Shutdown after [DATE 180 DAYS AFTER PUBLICATION OF FINAL RULE IN
THE Federal Register] means the cessation of operation of the drying
and curing of wet-formed fiberglass mat for any purpose. Shutdown ends
when fiberglass mat is no longer being dried or cured in the oven and
the oven no longer contains any resin infused binder.
    Startup after [DATE 180 DAYS AFTER PUBLICATION OF FINAL RULE IN THE
Federal Register] means the setting in operation of the drying and
curing of wet-formed fiberglass mat for any purpose. Startup begins
when resin infused fiberglass mat enters the oven to be dried and cured
for the first time or after a shutdown event.
* * * * *
0
14. Table 1 to Subpart HHHH of Part 63 is revised to read as follows:

 Table 1 to Subpart HHHH of Part 63--Minimum Requirements for Monitoring
                            and Recordkeeping
    As stated in Sec.   63.2998(c), you must comply with the minimum
  requirements for monitoring and recordkeeping in the following table:
------------------------------------------------------------------------
   You must monitor these                            And record for the
         parameters:           At this frequency:   monitored parameter:
------------------------------------------------------------------------
1. Thermal oxidizer           Continuously........  15-minute and 3-hour
 temperature \a\.                                    block averages.
2. Other process or control   As specified in your  As specified in your
 device parameters specified   OMM plan.             OMM plan.
 in your OMM plan.\b\
3. Urea-formaldehyde resin    On each operating     The average lb/h
 solids application rate.\d\   day, calculate the    value for each
                               average lb/h          product
                               application rate      manufactured during
                               for each product      the day.
                               manufactured during
                               that day.
4. Resin free-formaldehyde    For each lot of       The value for each
 content \d\.                  resin purchased.      lot used during the
                                                     operating day.
5. Loss-on-ignition c d.....  Measured at least     The value for each
                               once per day, for     product
                               each product          manufactured during
                               manufactured during   the operating day.
                               that day.
6. UF-to-latex ratio in the   For each batch of     The value for each
 binder c d.                   binder prepared the   batch of binder
                               operating day.        prepared during the
                                                     operating day.
7. Weight of the final mat    Each product          The value for each
 product per square (lb/       manufactured during   product
 roofing square).c d           the operating day.    manufactured during
                                                     the operating day.
8. Average nonwoven wet-      For each product      The average value
 formed fiberglass mat         manufactured during   for each product
 production rate (roofing      the operating day.    manufactured during
 square/h).c d                                       operating day.
------------------------------------------------------------------------
\a\ Required if a thermal oxidizer is used to control formaldehyde
  emissions.
\b\ ``Required if process modifications or a control device other than a
  thermal oxidizer is used to control formaldehyde emissions.
\c\ These parameters must be monitored and values recorded, but no
  operating limits apply.
\d\ You are not required to monitor or record these parameters during
  periods when using a non-HAP binder. If you elect to not monitor these
  parameters during these periods, you must record the dates and times
  that production of mat using the non-HAP binder began and ended.

0
15. Table 2 to Subpart HHHH of Part 63 is revised to read as follows:

 Table 2 to Subpart HHHH of Part 63--Applicability of General Provisions (40 CFR Part 63, Subpart A) to Subpart
                                                      HHHH
  As stated in Sec.   63.3001, you must comply with the applicable General Provisions requirements according to
                                              the following table:
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
              Citation                      Requirement         Applies to subpart HHHH        Explanation
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Sec.   63.1(a)(1)-(4)..............  General Applicability...  Yes.                      .......................
Sec.   63.1(a)(5)..................  ........................  No......................  [Reserved].
Sec.   63.1(a)(6)-(8)..............  Yes.                                                .......................
Sec.   63.1(a)(9)..................  ........................  No......................  [Reserved].
Sec.   63.1(a)(10)-(14)............  Yes.                                                .......................
Sec.   63.1(b).....................  Initial Applicability     Yes.
                                      Determination.
Sec.   63.1(c)(1)..................  Applicability After       Yes.
                                      Standard Established.
Sec.   63.1(c)(2)..................  ........................  Yes.....................  Some plants may be area
                                                                                sources.
Sec.   63.1(c)(3)..................  ........................  No......................  [Reserved].
Sec.   63.1(c)(4)-(5)..............  Yes.                                                .......................
Sec.   63.1(d).....................  ........................  No......................  [Reserved].
Sec.   63.1(e).....................  Applicability of Permit   Yes.                      .......................
                                      Program.
Sec.   63.2........................  Definitions.............  Yes.....................  Additional definitions
                                                                                in Sec.   63.3004.
Sec.   63.3........................  Units and Abbreviations.  Yes.
Sec.   63.4(a)(1)-(3)..............  Prohibited Activities...  Yes.
Sec.   63.4(a)(4)..................  ........................  No......................  [Reserved].
Sec.   63.4(a)(5)..................  Yes.                                                .......................
Sec.   63.4(b)-(c).................  Circumvention/            Yes.
                                      Severability.
Sec.   63.5(a).....................  Construction/             Yes.
                                      Reconstruction.
Sec.   63.5(b)(1)..................  Existing/Constructed/     Yes.
                                      Reconstruction.
Sec.   63.5(b)(2)..................  ........................  No......................  [Reserved].
Sec.   63.5(b)(3)-(6)..............  ........................  Yes.
Sec.   63.5(c).....................  ........................  No......................  [Reserved].
Sec.   63.5(d).....................  Application for Approval  Yes.
                                      of Construction/
                                      Reconstruction.
Sec.   63.5(e).....................  Approval of Construction/ Yes.                      .......................
                                      Reconstruction.
Sec.   63.5(f).....................  Approval of Construction/ Yes.                      .......................
                                      Reconstruction Based on
                                      State Review.
Sec.   63.6(a).....................  Compliance with           Yes.                      .......................
                                      Standards and
                                      Maintenance--Applicabil
                                      ity.
Sec.   63.6(b)(1)-(5)..............  New and Reconstructed     Yes.                      .......................
                                      Sources-Dates.
Sec.   63.6(b)(6)..................  ........................  No......................  [Reserved].
Sec.   63.6(b)(7)..................  Yes.                                                .......................
Sec.   63.6(c)(1)-(2)..............  Existing Sources Dates..  Yes.....................  Sec.   63.2985
                                                                                specifies dates.

Sec.   63.6(c)(3)-(4)..............  ........................  No......................  [Reserved].
Sec.   63.6(c)(5)..................  Yes.                                                .......................
Sec.   63.6(d).....................  ........................  No......................  [Reserved].
Sec.   63.6(e)(1)(i)...............  General Duty to Minimize  Yes before [DATE 181      See Sec.   63.2986(g)
                                      Emissions.                DAYS AFTER PUBLICATION    for general duty
                                                                OF FINAL RULE IN THE      requirement.
                                                                Federal Register].
                                     ........................  No after [DATE 180 DAYS
                                                                AFTER PUBLICATION OF
                                                                FINAL RULE IN THE
                                                                Federal Register].
Sec.   63.6(e)(1)(ii)..............  Requirement to Correct    Yes before [DATE 181
                                      Malfunctions ASAP.        DAYS AFTER PUBLICATION
                                                                OF FINAL RULE IN THE
                                                                Federal Register].
                                     ........................  No after [DATE 180 DAYS
                                                                AFTER PUBLICATION OF
                                                                FINAL RULE IN THE
                                                                Federal Register].
Sec.   63.6(e)(1)(iii).............  Operation and             Yes.....................  Sec.  Sec.   63.2984
                                      Maintenance                                         and 63.2987 specify
                                      Requirements.                                       additional
                                                                                requirements.
Sec.   63.6(e)(2)..................  ........................  No......................  [Reserved].
Sec.   63.6(e)(3)..................  SSM Plan Requirements...  Yes before [DATE 181
                                                                DAYS AFTER PUBLICATION
                                                                OF FINAL RULE IN THE
                                                                Federal Register].
                                     ........................  No after [DATE 180 DAYS
                                                                AFTER PUBLICATION OF
                                                                FINAL RULE IN THE
                                                                Federal Register].
Sec.   63.6(f)(1)..................  SSM Exemption...........  No.                       .......................
Sec.   63.6(f)(2) and (3)..........  Compliance with Non-      Yes.                      .......................
                                      Opacity Emission
                                      Standards.
Sec.   63.6(g).....................  Alternative Non-Opacity   Yes.....................  EPA retains approval
                                      Emission Standard.                                  authority.
Sec.   63.6(h).....................  Compliance with Opacity/  No......................  Subpart HHHH does not
                                      Visible Emissions                                   specify opacity or
                                      Standards.                                          visible emission
                                                                                standards.
Sec.   63.6(i)(1)-(14).............  Extension of Compliance.  Yes.                      .......................
Sec.   63.6(i)(15).................  ........................  No......................  [Reserved].
Sec.   63.6(i)(16).................  ........................  Yes.                      .......................
Sec.   63.6(j).....................  Exemption from            Yes.                      .......................
                                      Compliance.
Sec.   63.7(a).....................  Performance Test          Yes.                      .......................
                                      Requirements--Applicabi
                                      lity and Dates.
Sec.   63.7(b).....................  Notification of           Yes.                      .......................
                                      Performance Test.
Sec.   63.7(c).....................  Quality Assurance         Yes.                      .......................
                                      Program/Test Plan.
Sec.   63.7(d).....................  Testing Facilities......  Yes.                      .......................
Sec.   63.7(e)(1)..................  Performance Testing.....  Yes before [DATE 181      See Sec.   63.2992(c).
                                                                DAYS AFTER PUBLICATION
                                                                OF FINAL RULE IN THE
                                                                Federal Register].
                                                               No after [DATE 180 DAYS
                                                                AFTER PUBLICATION OF
                                                                FINAL RULE IN THE
                                                                Federal Register].
Sec.   63.7(e)(2)-(4)..............  Conduct of Tests........  Yes.....................  Sec.   63.2991-63.2994
                                                                                specify additional
                                                                                requirements.
Sec.   63.7(f).....................  Alternative Test Method.  Yes.....................  EPA retains approval
                                                                                authority.
Sec.   63.7(g).....................  Data Analysis...........  Yes.                      .......................
Sec.   63.7(h).....................  Waiver of Tests.........  Yes.                      .......................
Sec.   63.8(a)(1)-(2)..............  Monitoring Requirements-- Yes.                      .......................
                                      Applicability.
Sec.   63.8(a)(3)..................  ........................  No......................  [Reserved].
Sec.   63.8(a)(4)..................  ........................  Yes.                      .......................
Sec.   63.8(b).....................  Conduct of Monitoring...  Yes.                      .......................
Sec.   63.8(c)(1)(i)...............  General Duty to Minimize  Yes before [DATE 181
                                      Emissions and CMS         DAYS AFTER PUBLICATION
                                      Operation.                OF FINAL RULE IN THE
                                                                Federal Register].
                                                               No after [DATE 180 DAYS
                                                                AFTER PUBLICATION OF
                                                                FINAL RULE IN THE
                                                                Federal Register].
Sec.   63.8(c)(1)(ii)..............  Continuous Monitoring     Yes.                      .......................
                                      System (CMS) Operation
                                      and Maintenance.
Sec.   63.8(c)(1)(iii).............  Requirement to Develop    Yes before [DATE 181
                                      SSM Plan for CMS.         DAYS AFTER PUBLICATION
                                                                OF FINAL RULE IN THE
                                                                Federal Register].

                                     No after [DATE 180 DAYS                             .......................
                                      AFTER PUBLICATION OF
                                      FINAL RULE IN THE
                                      Federal Register].
Sec.   63.8(c)(2)-(4)..............  ........................  Yes.                      .......................
Sec.   63.8(c)(5)..................  Continuous Opacity        No......................  Subpart HHHH does not
                                      Monitoring System                                   specify opacity or
                                      (COMS) Procedures.                                  visible emission
                                                                                standards.
Sec.   63.8(c)(6)-(8)..............  ........................  Yes.                      .......................
Sec.   63.8(d)(1) and (2)..........  Quality Control.........  Yes.                      .......................
Sec.   63.8(d)(3)..................  Written Procedures for    Yes before [DATE 181      See Sec.   63.2994(a).
                                      CMS.                      DAYS AFTER PUBLICATION
                                                                OF FINAL RULE IN THE
                                                                Federal Register].
                                                               No after [DATE 180 DAYS
                                                                AFTER PUBLICATION OF
                                                                FINAL RULE IN THE
                                                                Federal Register].
Sec.   63.8(e).....................  CMS Performance           Yes.                      .......................
                                      Evaluation.
Sec.   63.8(f)(1)-(5)..............  Alternative Monitoring    Yes.....................  EPA retains approval
                                      Method.                                             authority.
Sec.   63.8(f)(6)..................  Alternative to Relative   No......................  Subpart HHHH does not
                                      Accuracy Test.                                      require the use of
                                                                                continuous emissions
                                                                                monitoring systems
                                                                                (CEMS)
Sec.   63.8(g)(1)..................  Data Reduction..........  Yes.                      .......................
Sec.   63.8(g)(2)..................  Data Reduction..........  No......................  Subpart HHHH does not
                                                                                require the use of
                                                                                CEMS or COMS.
Sec.   63.8(g)(3)-(5)..............  Data Reduction..........  Yes.                      .......................
Sec.   63.9(a).....................  Notification              Yes.                      .......................
                                      Requirements--Applicabi
                                      lity.
Sec.   63.9(b).....................  Initial Notifications...  Yes.                      .......................
Sec.   63.9(c).....................  Request for Compliance    Yes.                      .......................
                                      Extension.
Sec.   63.9(d).....................  New Source Notification   Yes.                      .......................
                                      for Special Compliance
                                      Requirements.
Sec.   63.9(e).....................  Notification of           Yes.                      .......................
                                      Performance Test.
Sec.   63.9(f).....................  Notification of Visible   No......................  Subpart HHHH does not
                                      Emissions/Opacity Test.                             specify opacity or
                                                                                visible emission
                                                                                standards.
Sec.   63.9(g)(1)..................  Additional CMS            Yes.                      .......................
                                      Notifications.
Sec.   63.9(g)(2)-(3)..............  ........................  No......................  Subpart HHHH does not
                                                                                require the use of
                                                                                COMS or CEMS.
Sec.   63.9(h)(1)-(3)..............  Notification of           Yes.....................  Sec.   63.3000(b)
                                      Compliance Status.                                  specifies additional
                                                                                requirements.
Sec.   63.9(h)(4)..................  ........................  No......................  [Reserved].
Sec.   63.9(h)(5)-(6)..............  ........................  Yes.                      .......................
Sec.   63.9(i).....................  Adjustment of Deadlines.  Yes.                      .......................
Sec.   63.9(j).....................  Change in Previous        Yes.                      .......................
                                      Information.
Sec.   63.10(a)....................  Recordkeeping/Reporting-- Yes.                      .......................
                                      Applicability.
Sec.   63.10(b)(1).................  General Recordkeeping     Yes.....................  Sec.   63.2998 includes
                                      Requirements.                                       additional
                                                                                requirements.
Sec.   63.10(b)(2)(i)..............  Recordkeeping of          Yes before [DATE 181
                                      Occurrence and Duration   DAYS AFTER PUBLICATION
                                      of Startups and           OF FINAL RULE IN THE
                                      Shutdowns.                Federal Register].
                                                               No after [DATE 180 DAYS   .......................
                                                                AFTER PUBLICATION OF
                                                                FINAL RULE IN THE
                                                                Federal Register].
Sec.   63.10(b)(2)(ii).............  Recordkeeping of          Yes before [DATE 181      See Sec.   63.2998(e)
                                      Failures to Meet a        DAYS AFTER PUBLICATION    for recordkeeping
                                      Standard.                 OF FINAL RULE IN THE      requirements for an
                                                                Federal Register].        affected source that
                                                                                fails to meet an
                                                                                applicable standard.
                                                               No after [DATE 180 DAYS
                                                                AFTER PUBLICATION OF
                                                                FINAL RULE IN THE
                                                                Federal Register].
Sec.   63.10(b)(2)(iii)............  Maintenance Records.....  Yes.                      .......................
Sec.   63.10(b)(2)(iv) and (v).....  Actions Taken to          Yes before [DATE 181
                                      Minimize Emissions        DAYS AFTER PUBLICATION
                                      During SSM.               OF FINAL RULE IN THE
                                                                Federal Register].
                                                               No after [DATE 180 DAYS   .......................
                                                                AFTER PUBLICATION OF
                                                                FINAL RULE IN THE
                                                                Federal Register].
Sec.   63.10(b)(2)(vi).............  Recordkeeping for CMS     Yes.                      .......................
                                      Malfunctions.
Sec.   63.10(b)(2)(vii)-(xiv)......  Other CMS Requirements..  Yes.                      .......................

Sec.   63.10(b)(3).................  Recordkeeping             Yes after [DATE 180 DAYS  .......................
                                      requirement for           AFTER PUBLICATION OF
                                      applicability             FINAL RULE IN THE
                                      determinations.           Federal Register].
Sec.   63.10(c)(1).................  Additional CMS            Yes.                      .......................
                                      Recordkeeping.
Sec.   63.10(c)(2)-(4).............  ........................  No......................  [Reserved].
Sec.   63.10(c)(5)-(8).............  ........................  Yes.                      .......................
Sec.   63.10(c)(9).................  ........................  No......................  [Reserved].
Sec.   63.10(c)(10)-(14)...........  ........................  Yes.                      .......................
Sec.   63.10(c)(15)................  Use of SSM Plan.........  Yes before [DATE 181
                                                                DAYS AFTER PUBLICATION
                                                                OF FINAL RULE IN THE
                                                                Federal Register].
                                                               No after [DATE 180 DAYS
                                                                AFTER PUBLICATION OF
                                                                FINAL RULE IN THE
                                                                Federal Register].
Sec.   63.10(d)(1).................  General Reporting         Yes.....................  Sec.   63.3000 includes
                                      Requirements.                                       additional
                                                                                requirements.
Sec.   63.10(d)(2).................  Performance Test Results  Yes.....................  Sec.   63.3000 includes
                                                                                additional
                                                                                requirements.
Sec.   63.10(d)(3).................  Opacity or Visible        No......................  Subpart HHHH does not
                                      Emissions Observations.                             specify opacity or
                                                                                visible emission
                                                                                standards.
Sec.   63.10(d)(4).................  Progress Reports Under    Yes.                      .......................
                                      Extension of Compliance.
Sec.   63.10(d)(5).................  SSM Reports.............  Yes before [DATE 181      See Sec.   63.3000(c)
                                                                DAYS AFTER PUBLICATION    for malfunction
                                                                OF FINAL RULE IN THE      reporting
                                                                Federal Register].        requirements.
                                                               No after [DATE 180 DAYS
                                                                AFTER PUBLICATION OF
                                                                FINAL RULE IN THE
                                                                Federal Register].
Sec.   63.10(e)(1).................  Additional CMS Reports--  No......................  Subpart HHHH does not
                                      General.                                            require CEMS.
Sec.   63.10(e)(2).................  Reporting results of CMS  Yes.                      .......................
                                      performance evaluations.
Sec.   63.10(e)(3).................  Excess Emission/CMS       Yes.                      .......................
                                      Performance Reports.
Sec.   63.10(e)(4).................  COMS Data Reports.......  No......................  Subpart HHHH does not
                                                                                specify opacity or
                                                                                visible emission
                                                                                standards.
Sec.   63.10(f)....................  Recordkeeping/Reporting   Yes.....................  EPA retains approval
                                      Waiver.                                             authority.
Sec.   63.11.......................  Control Device            No......................  Facilities subject to
                                      Requirements--Applicabi                             subpart HHHH do not
                                      lity.                                               use flares as control
                                                                                devices.
Sec.   63.12.......................  State Authority and       Yes.                      .......................
                                      Delegations.
Sec.   63.13.......................  Addresses...............  Yes.                      .......................
Sec.   63.14.......................  Incorporation by          Yes.                      .......................
                                      Reference.
Sec.   63.15.......................  Availability of           Yes.                      .......................
                                      Information/
                                      Confidentiality.
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

[FR Doc. 2018-06541 Filed 4-5-18; 8:45 am]
 BILLING CODE 6560-50-P