Record for the Final Metal Product and Machinery Rule VARIABLE DESCRIPTIONS FOR MuniMPCT_ Final. XLS VARIABLE DESCRIPTION WORKSHEET COLUMN CBI FORMULA Tests Impact Measure Description Summary B N Large Sample weighted number of large municipality facilities Summary C N = SUMIF( test_ summ!$ G$ 5:$ G$ 158, Summary! D$ 2& Summary!$ A4, test_ summ!$ S$ 5:$ S$ 158)

% Percent of large municipality facilities Summary D N = C4/ C$ 8 Small Sample weighted number of small municipality facilities Summary E N = SUMIF( test_ summ!$ G$ 5:$ G$ 158, Summary! F$ 2& Summary!$ A4, test_ summ!$ S$ 5:$ S$ 158)

% Percent of small municipality facilities Summary F N = E4/ E$ 8 Total Total number of sample weighted municipality facilities Summary G N = SUM( D4, F4)

% Percent of all municipality facilities Summary H N = G4/ G$ 8 SITE_ ID Survey ID Test_ Summ A N MUNI_ ID Municipality ID Test_ Summ B Y = LEFT( A6,5) Final Rule  Oily Waste Directs ( Option 1): Cost of Service Test Is cost service greater than 1% in Option 1? 1= yes; 0= no Test_ Summ C N = VLOOKUP($ A6, Tests!$ A$ 6:$ Y$ 125,4,0)

Final Rule  Oily Waste Directs ( Option 1): HH Afford Is household affordability greater than 1% in Option 1? 1= yes; 0= no Test_ Summ D N = VLOOKUP($ A6, Tests!$ A$ 6:$ Y$ 125,10,0)

Final Rule  Oily Waste Directs ( Option 1): Muni Debt Is their municipality debt greater than 25% in Option 1? 1= yes; 0= no Test_ Summ E N = VLOOKUP($ A6, Tests!$ A$ 6:$ Y$ 125,16,0)

Final Rule  Oily Waste Directs ( Option 1): Pass/ Fail Pass/ Fail Status: P= pass all tests; F CS= fail cost of service test; F HH= fail household affordability test; F MD= fail municipality debt test Test_ Summ F N = IF( AND( C6'= 0, D6'= 0, E6'= 0)," P", IF( E6'= 1," F MD", IF( D6'= 1," F HH", IF( C6'= 1," F CS"," n/ a"))))

Final Rule  Oily Waste Directs ( Option 1): Size+ Pass/ Fail Municipality Size and Pass/ Fail Status Test_ Summ G Y =$ W6& F6 Proposed/ NODA ( Option 2): Cost of Service Test Is cost service greater than 1% in Option 2? 1= yes; 0= no Test_ Summ H N = VLOOKUP($ A6, Tests!$ A$ 6:$ Y$ 125,5,0)

Proposed/ NODA ( Option 2): HH Afford Is household affordability greater than 1% in Option 2? 1= yes; 0= no Test_ Summ I N = VLOOKUP($ A6, Tests!$ A$ 6:$ Y$ 125,11,0)

Proposed/ NODA ( Option 2): Muni Debt Is their municipality debt greater than 25% in Option 2? 1= yes; 0= no Test_ Summ J N = VLOOKUP($ A6, Tests!$ A$ 6:$ Y$ 125,17,0)

Proposed/ NODA ( Option 2): Pass/ Fail Pass/ Fail Status: P= pass all tests; F CS= fail cost of service test; F HH= fail household affordability test; F MD= fail municipality debt test Test_ Summ K N = IF( AND( H6'= 0, I6'= 0, J6'= 0)," P", IF( J6'= 1," F MD", IF( I6'= 1," F HH", IF( H6'= 1," F CS"," n/ a"))))

Proposed/ NODA ( Option 2): Size+ Pass/ Fail Municipality Size and Pass/ Fail Status Test_ Summ L Y =$ W6& K6 413 to 433 Upgrade ( Option 3): Cost of Service Test Is cost service greater than 1% in Option 3? 1= yes; 0= no Test_ Summ M N = VLOOKUP($ A6, Tests!$ A$ 6:$ Y$ 125,6,0)

413 to 433 Upgrade ( Option 3): HH Afford Is household affordability greater than 1% in Option 3? 1= yes; 0= no Test_ Summ N N = VLOOKUP($ A6, Tests!$ A$ 6:$ Y$ 125,12,0)

413 to 433 Upgrade ( Option 3): Muni Debt Is their municipality debt greater than 25% in Option 3? 1= yes; 0= no Test_ Summ O N = VLOOKUP($ A6, Tests!$ A$ 6:$ Y$ 125,18,0)

413 to 433 Upgrade ( Option 3): Pass/ Fail Pass/ Fail Status: P= pass all tests; F CS= fail cost of service test; F HH= fail household affordability test; F MD= fail municipality debt test Test_ Summ P N = IF( AND( M6'= 0, N6'= 0, O6'= 0)," P", IF( O6'= 1," F MD", IF( N6'= 1," F HH", IF( M6'= 1," F CS"," n/ a"))))

413 to 433 Upgrade ( Option 3): Size+ Pass/ Fail Municipality Size and Pass/ Fail Status Test_ Summ Q Y =$ W6& P6 All 433 Upgrade ( Option 4): Cost of Service Test Is cost service greater than 1% in Option 4? 1= yes; 0= no Test_ Summ R N = VLOOKUP($ A6, Tests!$ A$ 6:$ Y$ 125,7,0)

All 433 Upgrade ( Option 4): HH Afford Is household affordability greater than 1% in Option 4? 1= yes; 0= no Test_ Summ S N = VLOOKUP($ A6, Tests!$ A$ 6:$ Y$ 125,13,0)

All 433 Upgrade ( Option 4): Muni Debt Is their municipality debt greater than 25% in Option 4? 1= yes; 0= no Test_ Summ T N = VLOOKUP($ A6, Tests!$ A$ 6:$ Y$ 125,19,0)

February 14, 2003 1 of 28 MuniMPCT_ Final. xls  Var Desc Record for the Final Metal Product and Machinery Rule VARIABLE DESCRIPTIONS FOR MuniMPCT_ Final. XLS VARIABLE DESCRIPTION WORKSHEET COLUMN CBI FORMULA All 433 Upgrade ( Option 4): Pass/ Fail Pass/ Fail Status: P= pass all tests; F CS= fail cost of service test; F HH= fail household affordability test; F MD= fail municipality debt test Test_ Summ U N = IF( AND( R6'= 0, S6'= 0, T6'= 0)," P", IF( T6'= 1," F MD", IF( S6'= 1," F HH", IF( R6'= 1," F CS"," n/ a"))))

All 433 Upgrade ( Option 4): Size+ Pass/ Fail Municipality Size and Pass/ Fail Status Test_ Summ V Y =$ W6& U6 Size Municipality Size Test_ Summ W Y = VLOOKUP( A6, facdata, 10,0) Weight Sample Weight Test_ Summ X Y = VLOOKUP($ B6, MuniData!$ A$ 6:$ F$ 60,6,0) Direct/ Indirect Discharger Type: D= Direct; I= Indirect Test_ Summ Y N = VLOOKUP( A6,'[ Summary_ Final. xls] Data'!$ A$ 6:$ G$ 953,7,0) Size& Type Municipality Size Test_ Summ Z Y = VLOOKUP( A6, FacData!$ A$ 7:$ N$ 127,14,0) SID Survey ID Tests A N = FacData! A8 MUNI_ ID Municipality ID Tests B Y = LEFT( A7,5) Fail Cost of Service: Opt 1 Is cost service greater than 1% in Option 1? 1= yes; 0= no Tests D N = IF( CostOfSvc! I7>'= 0.01,1,0)

Fail Cost of Service: Opt 2 Is cost service greater than 1% in Option 2? 1= yes; 0= no Tests E N = IF( CostOfSvc! J7>'= 0.01,1,0)

Fail Cost of Service: Opt 3 Is cost service greater than 1% in Option 3? 1= yes; 0= no Tests F N = IF( CostOfSvc! K7>'= 0.01,1,0)

Fail Cost of Service: Opt 4 Is cost service greater than 1% in Option 4? 1= yes; 0= no Tests G N = IF( CostOfSvc! L7>'= 0.01,1,0)

Fail HH Afford: Baseline Is household affordability greater than 1% in the baseline? 1= yes; 0= no Tests I N = IF( VLOOKUP($ B7,' HH Afford'!$ A$ 6:$ P$ 59, I$ 1,0)> 0.01,1,0)

Fail HH Afford: Opt 1 Is household affordability greater than 1% Option 1? 1= yes; 0= no Tests J = IF( AND($ I7< 1,( VLOOKUP($ B7,' HH Afford'!$ A$ 6:$ P$ 59, J$ 1,0)> 0.01)), 1,0)

Fail HH Afford: Opt 2 Is household affordability greater than 1% Option 2? 1= yes; 0= no Tests K N = IF( AND($ I7< 1,( VLOOKUP($ B7,' HH Afford'!$ A$ 6:$ P$ 59, K$ 1,0)> 0.01)), 1,0)

Fail HH Afford: Opt 3 Is household affordability greater than 1% Option 3? 1= yes; 0= no Tests L = IF( AND($ I7< 1,( VLOOKUP($ B7,' HH Afford'!$ A$ 6:$ P$ 59, L$ 1,0)> 0.01)), 1,0)

Fail HH Afford: Opt 4 Is household affordability greater than 1% Option 4? 1= yes; 0= no Tests M N = IF( AND($ I7< 1,( VLOOKUP($ B7,' HH Afford'!$ A$ 6:$ P$ 59, M$ 1,0)> 0.01)), 1,0)

Fail Muni Debt: Baseline Is their municipality debt greater than 25% in the baseline? 1= yes; 0= no Tests O N = IF( VLOOKUP($ B7, MuniDebt!$ A$ 6:$ I$ 59, O$ 1,0)> 0.25,1,0)

Fail Muni Debt: Opt 1 Is their municipality debt greater than 25% in Option 1? 1= yes; 0= no P = IF( AND($ O7< 1*( VLOOKUP($ B7, MuniDebt!$ A$ 6:$ I$ 59, P$ 1,0)> 0.25)), 1,0)

Fail Muni Debt: Opt 2 Is their municipality debt greater than 25% in Option 2? 1= yes; 0= no Tests Q N = IF( AND($ O7< 1*( VLOOKUP($ B7, MuniDebt!$ A$ 6:$ I$ 59, Q$ 1,0)> 0.25)), 1,0)

Fail Muni Debt: Opt 3 Is their municipality debt greater than 25% in Option 3? 1= yes; 0= no R = IF( AND($ O7< 1*( VLOOKUP($ B7, MuniDebt!$ A$ 6:$ I$ 59, R$ 1,0)> 0.25)), 1,0)

Fail Muni Debt: Opt 4 Is their municipality debt greater than 25% in Option 4? 1= yes; 0= no Tests S N = IF( AND($ O7< 1*( VLOOKUP($ B7, MuniDebt!$ A$ 6:$ I$ 59, S$ 1,0)> 0.25)), 1,0)

Joint No Pass: Opt 1 Does the site pass any of the three tests in Option 1? 0= yes, 1= no U = IF( OR( P7'= 0, J7'= 0, D7'= 0), 0,1)

Joint No Pass: Opt 2 Does the site pass any of the three tests in Option 2? 0= yes, 1= no Tests V N = IF( OR( Q7'= 0, K7'= 0, E7'= 0), 0,1)

Joint No Pass: Opt 3 Does the site pass any of the three tests in Option 3? 0= yes, 1= no W = IF( OR( R7'= 0, L7'= 0, F7'= 0), 0,1)

Joint No Pass: Opt 4 Does the site pass any of the three tests in Option 4? 0= yes, 1= no Tests X N = IF( OR( S7'= 0, M7'= 0, G7'= 0), 0,1)

SITE_ ID Survey ID CostOfSvc A N = FacData! A8 MUNI_ ID Municipality ID CostOfSvc B Y = LEFT( A7,5) Total Costs & Expenditures Total Costs and Expenditures CostOfSvc C Y = FacData! E8 1996 Annualized Compliance Cost: Opt 1 1996 Annualized Compliance Cost ( without Interest): Option 1 CostOfSvc D Y = Costs! F8 1996 Annualized Compliance Cost: Opt 2 1996 Annualized Compliance Cost ( without Interest): Option 2 CostOfSvc E Y = Costs! I8 1996 Annualized Compliance Cost: Opt 3 1996 Annualized Compliance Cost ( without Interest): Option 3 F Y = Costs! L8 February 14, 2003 2 of 28 MuniMPCT_ Final. xls  Var Desc Record for the Final Metal Product and Machinery Rule VARIABLE DESCRIPTIONS FOR MuniMPCT_ Final. XLS VARIABLE DESCRIPTION WORKSHEET COLUMN CBI FORMULA 1996 Annualized Compliance Cost: Opt 4 1996 Annualized Compliance Cost ( without Interest): Option 4 CostOfSvc G Y = Costs! O8 Compliance Cost Share of Baseline Cost of Service: Opt 1 1996 Interest Payments: Option 1 CostOfSvc I Y = D7/$ C7 Compliance Cost Share of Baseline Cost of Service: Opt 2 1996 Interest Payments: Option 2 CostOfSvc J Y = E7/$ C7 Compliance Cost Share of Baseline Cost of Service: Opt 3 1996 Interest Payments: Option 3 CostOfSvc K Y = F7/$ C7 Compliance Cost Share of Baseline Cost of Service: Opt 4 1996 Interest Payments: Option 4 CostOfSvc L Y = G7/$ C7 MUNI_ ID Municipality ID HH Afford A N = MuniData! A8 PC BUDGET Pollution Control Budget HH Afford B Y = MuniFin! R8 Households Number of Households in the Municipality HH Afford C Y = MuniData! L8 Per Household Post Compliance Total Cost: Baseline Per Household Post Compliance Total Cost: Baseline HH Afford D Y =$ B7/$ C7 Per Household Post Compliance Total Cost: Opt 1 Per Household Post Compliance Total Cost: Option 1 HH Afford E Y =( SUMIF( CostOfSvc!$ B$ 7:$ B$ 66,' HH Afford'!$ A7, CostOfSvc! D$ 7: D$ 66)+$ B7)/$ C7 Per Household Post Compliance Total Cost: Opt 2 Per Household Post Compliance Total Cost: Option 2 HH Afford F Y =( SUMIF( CostOfSvc!$ B$ 7:$ B$ 66,' HH Afford'!$ A7, CostOfSvc! E$ 7: E$ 66)+$ B7)/$ C7 Per Household Post Compliance Total Cost: Opt 3 Per Household Post Compliance Total Cost: Option 3 HH Afford G Y =( SUMIF( CostOfSvc!$ B$ 7:$ B$ 66,' HH Afford'!$ A7, CostOfSvc! F$ 7: F$ 66)+$ B7)/$ C7 Per Household Post Compliance Total Cost: Opt 4 Per Household Post Compliance Total Cost: Option 4 HH Afford H Y =( SUMIF( CostOfSvc!$ B$ 7:$ B$ 66,' HH Afford'!$ A7, CostOfSvc! G$ 7: G$ 66)+$ B7)/$ C7 Median HH Income Median Household Income in the Municipality HH Afford J Y = MuniData! M8 Cost Share of Median Income: Baseline Cost Share of Median Income: Baseline HH Afford K Y =+ D7/$ J7 Cost Share of Median Income: Opt 1 Cost Share of Median Income: Option 1 HH Afford M Y =+ E7/$ J7 Cost Share of Median Income: Opt 2 Cost Share of Median Income: Option 2 HH Afford M Y =+ F7/$ J7 Cost Share of Median Income: Opt 3 Cost Share of Median Income: Option 3 HH Afford N Y =+ G7/$ J7 Cost Share of Median Income: Opt 4 Cost Share of Median Income: Option 4 HH Afford O Y =+ H7/$ J7 MUNI_ ID Municipality ID MuniDebt A N = MuniData! A8 Total Cost of Debt Service Total Cost of Debt Service MuniDebt B Y = MuniFin! Q8 Total Revenues ( from all sources) Total Revenues ( from all sources) MuniDebt C Y = MuniFin! B8 Cost of Debt Service as a Percent of Revenue: Baseline Cost of Debt Service as a Percent of Revenue: Baseline MuniDebt D Y =$ B7/$ C7 Cost of Debt Service as a Percent of Revenue: Opt 1 Cost of Debt Service as a Percent of Revenue: Option 1 MuniDebt E Y =( SUMIF( Costs!$ C$ 7:$ C$ 98, MuniDebt!$ A7, Costs! F$ 7: F$ 98)+$ B7)/$ C7 Cost of Debt Service as a Percent of Revenue: Opt 2 Cost of Debt Service as a Percent of Revenue: Option 2 MuniDebt F Y =( SUMIF( Costs!$ C$ 7:$ C$ 98, MuniDebt!$ A7, Costs! I$ 7: I$ 98)+$ B7)/$ C7 Cost of Debt Service as a Percent of Revenue: Opt 3 Cost of Debt Service as a Percent of Revenue: Option 3 MuniDebt G Y =( SUMIF( Costs!$ C$ 7:$ C$ 98, MuniDebt!$ A7, Costs! L$ 7: L$ 98)+$ B7)/$ C7 February 14, 2003 3 of 28 MuniMPCT_ Final. xls  Var Desc Record for the Final Metal Product and Machinery Rule VARIABLE DESCRIPTIONS FOR MuniMPCT_ Final. XLS VARIABLE DESCRIPTION WORKSHEET COLUMN CBI FORMULA Cost of Debt Service as a Percent of Revenue: Opt 4 Cost of Debt Service as a Percent of Revenue: Option 4 MuniDebt H Y =( SUMIF( Costs!$ C$ 7:$ C$ 98, MuniDebt!$ A7, Costs! O$ 7: O$ 98)+$ B7)/$ C7 MUNI_ ID Municipality ID MuniData A N SHORT NAME Name of Municipality MuniData B Y ID + 00 Municipality ID followed by " 00" MuniData C Y = CONCATENATE( A8," 00") SOURCE Type of Municipality ( e. g., city, county, transit) MuniData D Y = VLOOKUP($ A8,[ MUN_ WGT1. xls] MUNIWGTS!$ B$ 1:$ H$ 151,3, FALSE)

STATE State MuniData E Y = VLOOKUP($ A8,[ MUN_ WGT1. xls] MUNIWGTS!$ B$ 1:$ H$ 151,4, FALSE) WEIGHT Sample Weight MuniData F Y = VLOOKUP($ A8,[ MUN_ WGT1. xls] MUNIWGTS!$ B$ 1:$ H$ 151,5, FALSE) REG Region MuniData G Y = VLOOKUP($ A8,[ MUN_ WGT1. xls] MUNIWGTS!$ B$ 1:$ H$ 151,6, FALSE) POP Population Range MuniData H Y = VLOOKUP($ A8,[ MUN_ WGT1. xls] MUNIWGTS!$ B$ 1:$ H$ 151,7, FALSE) EMPS( 1996) Number of Employees MuniData I Y YEAR Year of Most Recent Demographic Data MuniData J Y POPULATION Population MuniData K Y # HSHOLDS Number of Households in the Municipality MuniData L Y MED HH INC ($) Median Household Income in the Municipality MuniData M Y AERO Do you own and operate at least one aerospace site? 1= yes; 0= no MuniData T Y AIR Do you own and operate at least one aircraft site? 1= yes; 0= no MuniData U Y BUS Do you own and operate at least one bus & truck site? 1= yes; 0= no MuniData V Y ELEC Do you own and operate at least one electronic equipment site? 1= yes; 0= no MuniData W Y HARD Do you own and operate at least one hardware site? 1= yes; 0= no MuniData X Y HOUSE Do you own and operate at least one household equipment site? 1= yes; 0= no MuniData Y Y INSTR Do you own and operate at least one instruments site? 1= yes; 0= no MuniData Z Y MOB Do you own and operate at least one mobile industrial equipment site? 1= yes; 0= no MuniData AA Y MOTOR Do you own and operate at least one motor vehicles site? 1= yes; 0= no MuniData AB Y OFF Do you own and operate at least one office machines site? 1= yes; 0= no MuniData AC Y ORDN Do you own and operate at least one ordnance site? 1= yes; 0= no MuniData AD Y OTH Do you own and operate at least one other metal products site? 1= yes; 0= no MuniData AE Y PREC Do you own and operate at least one precious metals and jewelry site? 1= yes; 0= no MuniData AF Y PRINT Do you own and operate at least one printed circuit boards site? 1= yes; 0= no MuniData AG Y RAIL Do you own and operate at least one railroad site? 1= yes; 0= no MuniData AH Y SHIPS Do you own and operate at least one ships & boats site? 1= yes; 0= no MuniData AI Y STAT Do you own and operate at least one stationary industrial equipment site? 1= yes; 0= no MuniData AJ Y MUNI_ ID Municipality ID MuniFin A N TOTAL REVENUES, 1996$ TOTAL REVENUES, 1996$ MuniFin B Y PROPERTY REVENUE, 1996$ Tax Revenue from Property ( Real and Other), 1996$ MuniFin C Y February 14, 2003 4 of 28 MuniMPCT_ Final. xls  Var Desc Record for the Final Metal Product and Machinery Rule VARIABLE DESCRIPTIONS FOR MuniMPCT_ Final. XLS VARIABLE DESCRIPTION WORKSHEET COLUMN CBI FORMULA PROP REV RESIDENTIAL, 1996$ Tax Revenue from Residential Property, 1996$ MuniFin D Y PROP REV COMMERICAL, 1996$ Tax Revenue from Commercial Property, 1996$ MuniFin E Y GRANT REVENUES, 1996$ Revenues from Grants, 1996$ MuniFin F Y OTHER REVENUES, 1996$ Other Revenues ( includes fees, fines, service charges, interest, rental income, excise taxes and all other municipal revenues other than property taxes and grants), 1996$ MuniFin G Y OTHER REV HOUSEHOLDS, 1996$ Other Revenues from Households, 1996$ MuniFin H Y OTHER REV COMMERICIAL, 1996$ Other Revenues from Businesses, 1996$ MuniFin I Y OTHER REV INDETERMINATE, 1996$ Other Revenues, Intermediate Origin, 1996$ MuniFin J Y MARKET VALUE TAXABLE PROPERTY, 1996$ Full Market Value of Taxable Property, 1996$ MuniFin K Y MARKET VALUE RESIDENTIAL, 1996$ Full Market Value of Taxable Residential Property, 1996$ MuniFin L Y MARKET VALUE COMMERCIAL, 1996$ Full Market Value of Taxable Commercial Property, 1996$ MuniFin M Y TAX COLLECTION RATE (%), 1996$ Property Tax Collection Rate ( ratio of property taxes collected to property taxes levied), 1996$ MuniFin N Y CASH RESERVES, 1996$ Cash Reserves, 1996$ MuniFin O Y TOTAL DEBT, 1996$ Total Debt, all types, 1996$ MuniFin P Y COST OF DEBT SERVICE, 1996$ Cost of Debt Service ( include both interest and repayment of principal), 1996$ MuniFin Q Y ANNUAL POLLUTION CONTROL BUDGET, 1996$ Annual Budget for Current Pollution Control, 1996$ MuniFin R Y FINANCED BY TAX REVS, 1996$ Annual Budget for Current Pollution Control: Amount Financed by Tax Revenues, 1996$ MuniFin S Y FINANCED BY FEE REVS, 1996$ Annual Budget for Current Pollution Control: Amount Financed by Fee Revenues, 1996$ MuniFin T Y FINANCED BY OTHER, 1996$ Annual Budget for Current Pollution Control: Amount Financed by All Other Sources including Grants, 1996$ MuniFin U Y RESIDENTIAL FEES RESIDENTIAL FEES MuniFin V Y = SUMIF( FacData!$ C$ 8:$ C$ 269, MuniFin! A8, FacData!$ I$ 8:$ I$ 269) NON RESIDENTIAL FEES NON RESIDENTIAL FEES MuniFin W Y = SUMIF( FacData!$ C$ 8:$ C$ 269, MuniFin!$ A8, FacData!$ H$ 8:$ H$ 269) SITE_ ID Survey ID FacData A N SITE NAME Site Name FacData B Y MUNI_ ID Municipality ID FacData C Y = LEFT( A8,5) FACILITY SECTOR Facility Sector FacData D Y = VLOOKUP( A8,'[ RevbySct_ Final. xls] Summary'!$ A$ 3:$ BM$ 923,10,0) TOTAL COSTS & EXPENDITURES, 1996$ Total FY 1996 Costs and Expenditures including operating, overhead and debt service costs and expenses, 1996$ FacData E Y DEBT SERVICE, 1996$ Debt Service ( including interest and repayment of capital), 1996$ FacData F Y GENERAL FUNDS, 1996$ General Funds, 1996$ FacData G Y FEES FROM SITE ACTIVITIES, 1996$ Fees for Activities Performed by This Site, 1996$ FacData H Y FEES FROM RESIDENTIAL PAYERS, 1996$ Of Fees for Activities Performed by This Site, Amount from Residential Fee Payers, If Known, 1996$ FacData I Y February 14, 2003 5 of 28 MuniMPCT_ Final. xls  Var Desc Record for the Final Metal Product and Machinery Rule VARIABLE DESCRIPTIONS FOR MuniMPCT_ Final. XLS VARIABLE DESCRIPTION WORKSHEET COLUMN CBI FORMULA ENTITY SIZE Is the municipality small ( population of 50,000 or less)? FacData J Y = IF( VLOOKUP( C8, munidata, 11,0)<'= 50000," Small", IF( VLOOKUP( C8, munidata, 11,0)> 50000," Large"," Unknown")) WEIGHT Sample Weight FacData K Y = VLOOKUP( A8,'[ Summary_ Final. xls] Data'!$ A$ 6:$ DO$ 990,5,0) GOV'T TYPE Government Type: M = Municipal Government; C = County Government; S = State Government; R = Regional Government Authority FacData L Y SIZE& TYPE Municipality Size & Gov't Type FacData M Y = J8& L8 SITE_ ID Survey ID Costs A N = FacData! A8 MUNI_ ID Municipality ID Costs C Y = LEFT( A8,5) Option 1 ( OW Directs): CapCst1 Option 1 Capital Costs, 1996$ Costs D Y = VLOOKUP($ A8,'[ CompCost_ Final. xls] 1996'!$ A$ 7:$ S$ 1392, D$ 1,0)

Option 1 ( OW Directs): AnnCst1 Option 1 Annual Costs, 1996$ Costs E Y = VLOOKUP($ A8,'[ CompCost_ Final. xls] 1996'!$ A$ 7:$ S$ 1392, E$ 1,0)

Option 1 ( OW Directs): CC1_ 96 Annualized Option 1 Costs, 1996$ Costs F Y = VLOOKUP($ A8,'[ CompCost_ Final. xls] 1996'!$ A$ 7:$ S$ 1392, F$ 1,0)

Option 2 ( Proposed/ NODA): CapCst2 Option 2 Capital Costs, 1996$ Costs G Y = VLOOKUP($ A8,'[ CompCost_ Final. xls] 1996'!$ A$ 7:$ S$ 1392, G$ 1,0)

Option 2 ( Proposed/ NODA): AnnCst2 Option 2 Annual Costs, 1996$ Costs H Y = VLOOKUP($ A8,'[ CompCost_ Final. xls] 1996'!$ A$ 7:$ S$ 1392, H$ 1,0)

Option 2 ( Proposed/ NODA): CC2_ 96 Annualized Option 2 Costs, 1996$ Costs I Y = VLOOKUP($ A8,'[ CompCost_ Final. xls] 1996'!$ A$ 7:$ S$ 1392, I$ 1,0)

Option 3 ( Directs + 413): CapCst3 Option 3 Capital Costs, 1996$ Costs J Y = VLOOKUP($ A8,'[ CompCost_ Final. xls] 1996'!$ A$ 7:$ S$ 1392, J$ 1,0)

Option 3 ( Directs + 413): AnnCst3 Option 3 Annual Costs, 1996$ Costs K Y = VLOOKUP($ A8,'[ CompCost_ Final. xls] 1996'!$ A$ 7:$ S$ 1392, K$ 1,0)

Option 3 ( Directs + 413): CC3_ 96 Annualized Option 3 Costs, 1996$ Costs L Y = VLOOKUP($ A8,'[ CompCost_ Final. xls] 1996'!$ A$ 7:$ S$ 1392, L$ 1,0)

Option 4 ( Directs + 413 + Local Limits): CapCst4 Option 4 Capital Costs, 1996$ Costs M Y = VLOOKUP($ A8,'[ CompCost_ Final. xls] 1996'!$ A$ 7:$ S$ 1392, M$ 1,0)

Option 4 ( Directs + 413 + Local Limits): AnnCst4 Option 4 Annual Costs, 1996$ Costs N Y = VLOOKUP($ A8,'[ CompCost_ Final. xls] 1996'!$ A$ 7:$ S$ 1392, N$ 1,0)

Option 4 ( Directs + 413 + Local Limits): CC4_ 96 Annualized Option 4 Costs, 1996$ Costs O Y = VLOOKUP($ A8,'[ CompCost_ Final. xls] 1996'!$ A$ 7:$ S$ 1392, O$ 1,0)

1996 Social Cost: Option 1 1996 Social Cost: the basic option Costs S Y = E8+( D8* AMORT_ O) 1996 Social Cost: Option 2 1996 Social Cost: the sand filter option Costs T Y = H8+( G8* AMORT_ O) 1996 Social Cost: Option 3 1996 Social Cost: NODA option Costs U Y = K8+( J8* AMORT_ O) 1996 Social Cost: Option 4 NODA option labor cost for operating and maintenance of capital equipment Costs V Y = N8+( M8* AMORT_ O)

2001 Annualized Compliance Cost: Option 1 NODA option annual labor cost for installation of capital equipment Costs W Y = F8*( CCI01/ CCI96)

2001 Annualized Compliance Cost: Option 2 NODA option annual labor cost for manufacturing of capital equipment Costs X Y = I8*( CCI01/ CCI96)

2001 Annualized Compliance Cost: Option 3 NODA option one time labor cost for installation of capital equipment Costs Y Y = L8*( CCI01/ CCI96)

2001 Annualized Compliance Cost: Option 4 NODA option one time labor cost for manufacturing of capital equipment Costs Z Y = O8*( CCI01/ CCI96)

February 14, 2003 6 of 28 MuniMPCT_ Final. xls  Var Desc Record for the Final Metal Product and Machinery Rule Constants and Other Numeric Values blue numbers are exogenous RATE_ D 0.07 discount rate for amortization RATE_ O 0.07 OMB discount rate for social opportunity cost PERIOD 15 Number of years amortized AMORT_ D 0.109794625 Amortization factor, 15 years AMORT_ O 0.109794625 Amortization factor, 15 years, OMB rate CCI96 5620 Construction Cost Index  Annual Average ( http:// enr. construction. com/ cost/ costcci. asp) CCI97 5825 Construction Cost Index  Annual Average ( http:// enr. construction. com/ cost/ costcci. asp) CCI98 5920 Construction Cost Index  Annual Average ( http:// enr. construction. com/ cost/ costcci. asp) CCI99 6060 Construction Cost Index  Annual Average ( http:// enr. construction. com/ cost/ costcci. asp) CCI00 6221 Construction Cost Index  Annual Average ( http:// enr. construction. com/ cost/ costcci. asp) CCI01 6342 Construction Cost Index  Annual Average ( http:// enr. construction. com/ cost/ costcci. asp)

February 14, 2003 7 of 28 MuniMPCT_ Final. xls  Values Record for the Final Metal Product and Machinery Rule Tests Large % Small % Total % Final Rule  Oily Waste Directs ( Option 1) P Pass all three tests 1,801 98.8% 1,822 92.9% 3,623 95.7% F MD Fail Government Debt Test 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% F HH Fail Taxpayers Test 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% F CS Fail Cost of Service 22 1.2% 140 7.1% 162 4.3% Total 1,823 100% 1,962 100% 3,785 100% Proposed/ NODA ( Option 2) P Pass all three tests 1,672 91.7% 1,822 92.9% 3,494 92.3% F MD Fail Government Debt Test 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% F HH Fail Taxpayers Test 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% F CS Fail Cost of Service 151 8.3% 140 7.1% 291 7.7% Total 1,823 100% 1,962 100% 3,785 100% 413 to 433 Upgrade ( Option 3) P Pass all three tests 1,801 98.8% 1,822 92.9% 3,623 95.7% F MD Fail Government Debt Test 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% F HH Fail Taxpayers Test 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% F CS Fail Cost of Service 22 1.2% 140 7.1% 162 4.3% Total 1,823 100% 1,962 100% 3,785 100% All 433 Upgrade ( Option 4) P Pass all three tests 1,791 98.2% 1,822 92.9% 3,613 95.4% F MD Fail Government Debt Test 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% F HH Fail Taxpayers Test 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% F CS Fail Cost of Service 32 1.8% 140 7.1% 172 4.6% Total 1,823 100% 1,962 100% 3,785 100%

m s c r Municipal Government State Government County Government Regional Governmental Authority Total Large Large Governments ( population> 50,000) 618 377 781 46 1,823 Small Small Governments ( population <= 50,000) 1,750 0 212 0 1,962 All Governments 2,368 377 993 46 3,785 Sum of Weight Direct/ Indirect size & type D I Grand Total Largec 23 758 781 Largem 26 592 618 Larger 46 46 Larges 129 248 377 Smallc 212 212 Smallm 280 1,470 1,750 Grand Total 458 3,327 3,785 February 14, 2003 8 of 28 MuniMPCT_ Final. xls  Summary Record for the Final Metal Product and Machinery Rule TEST SUMMARY Final Rule  Oily Waste Directs ( Option 1) Proposed/ NODA ( Option 2) 413 to 433 Upgrade ( Option 3) All 433 Upgrade ( Option 4)

SITE_ ID MUNI_ ID Cost of Service Test HH Afford Muni Debt Pass/ Fail Size+ Pass/ Fail Cost of Service Test HH Afford Muni Debt Pass/ Fail Size+ Pass/ Fail Cost of Service Test HH Afford Muni Debt Pass/ Fail Size+ Pass/ Fail Cost of Service Test HH Afford Muni Debt Pass/ Fail Size+ Pass/ Fail 4 0 0 0 P 0 0 0 P 0 0 0 P 0 0 0 P 17 0 0 0 P 0 0 0 P 0 0 0 P 0 0 0 P 18 0 0 0 P 0 0 0 P 0 0 0 P 0 0 0 P 23 0 0 0 P 0 0 0 P 0 0 0 P 0 0 0 P 30 0 0 0 P 0 0 0 P 0 0 0 P 0 0 0 P 39 0 0 0 P 0 0 0 P 0 0 0 P 0 0 0 P 40 0 0 0 P 0 0 0 P 0 0 0 P 0 0 0 P 93 0 0 0 P 1 0 0 F CS 0 0 0 P 0 0 0 P 98 0 0 0 P 0 0 0 P 0 0 0 P 0 0 0 P 104 0 0 0 P 0 0 0 P 0 0 0 P 0 0 0 P 117 0 0 0 P 0 0 0 P 0 0 0 P 0 0 0 P 123 0 0 0 P 0 0 0 P 0 0 0 P 0 0 0 P 134 0 0 0 P 0 0 0 P 0 0 0 P 0 0 0 P 139 0 0 0 P 0 0 0 P 0 0 0 P 0 0 0 P 152 0 0 0 P 0 0 0 P 0 0 0 P 0 0 0 P 167 0 0 0 P 0 0 0 P 0 0 0 P 0 0 0 P 171 0 0 0 P 0 0 0 P 0 0 0 P 0 0 0 P 205 0 0 0 P 0 0 0 P 0 0 0 P 0 0 0 P 213 0 0 0 P 1 0 0 F CS 0 0 0 P 0 0 0 P 218 0 0 0 P 0 0 0 P 0 0 0 P 0 0 0 P 258 0 0 0 P 0 0 0 P 0 0 0 P 0 0 0 P 272 0 0 0 P 0 0 0 P 0 0 0 P 0 0 0 P 277 0 0 0 P 0 0 0 P 0 0 0 P 0 0 0 P 278 0 0 0 P 1 0 0 F CS 0 0 0 P 0 0 0 P 292 0 0 0 P 0 0 0 P 0 0 0 P 0 0 0 P 311 0 0 0 P 0 0 0 P 0 0 0 P 0 0 0 P 318 0 0 0 P 0 0 0 P 0 0 0 P 0 0 0 P 341 0 0 0 P 0 0 0 P 0 0 0 P 0 0 0 P 346 0 0 0 P 0 0 0 P 0 0 0 P 0 0 0 P 347 0 0 0 P 0 0 0 P 0 0 0 P 0 0 0 P 348 0 0 0 P 1 0 0 F CS 0 0 0 P 0 0 0 P 360 0 0 0 P 1 0 0 F CS 0 0 0 P 0 0 0 P 362 0 0 0 P 0 0 0 P 0 0 0 P 0 0 0 P 368 0 0 0 P 0 0 0 P 0 0 0 P 0 0 0 P 379 0 0 0 P 0 0 0 P 0 0 0 P 0 0 0 P 385 0 0 0 P 0 0 0 P 0 0 0 P 0 0 0 P 391 0 0 0 P 1 0 0 F CS 0 0 0 P 0 0 0 P 394 0 0 0 P 0 0 0 P 0 0 0 P 0 0 0 P 397 0 0 0 P 0 0 0 P 0 0 0 P 0 0 0 P 405 0 0 0 P 0 0 0 P 0 0 0 P 0 0 0 P 427 0 0 0 P 0 0 0 P 0 0 0 P 0 0 0 P 437 0 0 0 P 0 0 0 P 0 0 0 P 0 0 0 P 465 0 0 0 P 0 0 0 P 0 0 0 P 0 0 0 P 467 0 0 0 P 0 0 0 P 0 0 0 P 0 0 0 P 478 0 0 0 P 0 0 0 P 0 0 0 P 0 0 0 P 483 0 0 0 P 0 0 0 P 0 0 0 P 0 0 0 P 485 1 0 0 F CS 1 0 0 F CS 1 0 0 F CS 1 0 0 F CS 491 0 0 0 P 0 0 0 P 0 0 0 P 0 0 0 P 499 0 0 0 P 0 0 0 P 0 0 0 P 0 0 0 P 508 0 0 0 P 0 0 0 P 0 0 0 P 0 0 0 P February 14, 2003 9 of 28 MuniMPCT_ Final. xls  test_ summ Record for the Final Metal Product and Machinery Rule Size Weight Direct/ Indirect Size& Type I I D I I D I I I I I I I I I I I I D I I I I D I I I I I I I D I I I I I I I I I I I I I I D I I I February 14, 2003 10 of 28 MuniMPCT_ Final. xls  test_ summ Record for the Final Metal Product and Machinery Rule TEST SUMMARY Final Rule  Oily Waste Directs ( Option 1) Proposed/ NODA ( Option 2) 413 to 433 Upgrade ( Option 3) All 433 Upgrade ( Option 4)

SITE_ ID MUNI_ ID Cost of Service Test HH Afford Muni Debt Pass/ Fail Size+ Pass/ Fail Cost of Service Test HH Afford Muni Debt Pass/ Fail Size+ Pass/ Fail Cost of Service Test HH Afford Muni Debt Pass/ Fail Size+ Pass/ Fail Cost of Service Test HH Afford Muni Debt Pass/ Fail Size+ Pass/ Fail 521 0 0 0 P 0 0 0 P 0 0 0 P 0 0 0 P 535 0 0 0 P 0 0 0 P 0 0 0 P 0 0 0 P 541 0 0 0 P 0 0 0 P 0 0 0 P 0 0 0 P 553 0 0 0 P 0 0 0 P 0 0 0 P 0 0 0 P 554 0 0 0 P 0 0 0 P 0 0 0 P 0 0 0 P 557 0 0 0 P 1 0 0 F CS 0 0 0 P 1 0 0 F CS 558 0 0 0 P 0 0 0 P 0 0 0 P 0 0 0 P 565 0 0 0 P 0 0 0 P 0 0 0 P 0 0 0 P 569 0 0 0 P 0 0 0 P 0 0 0 P 0 0 0 P 571 0 0 0 P 0 0 0 P 0 0 0 P 0 0 0 P 573 0 0 0 P 0 0 0 P 0 0 0 P 0 0 0 P 581 0 0 0 P 0 0 0 P 0 0 0 P 0 0 0 P 582 0 0 0 P 0 0 0 P 0 0 0 P 0 0 0 P 588 0 0 0 P 1 0 0 F CS 0 0 0 P 0 0 0 P 602 0 0 0 P 0 0 0 P 0 0 0 P 0 0 0 P 646 0 0 0 P 0 0 0 P 0 0 0 P 0 0 0 P 647 0 0 0 P 0 0 0 P 0 0 0 P 0 0 0 P 657 0 0 0 P 0 0 0 P 0 0 0 P 0 0 0 P 672 0 0 0 P 0 0 0 P 0 0 0 P 0 0 0 P 686 0 0 0 P 0 0 0 P 0 0 0 P 0 0 0 P 689 0 0 0 P 0 0 0 P 0 0 0 P 0 0 0 P 691 0 0 0 P 0 0 0 P 0 0 0 P 0 0 0 P 692 0 0 0 P 0 0 0 P 0 0 0 P 0 0 0 P 736 0 0 0 P 0 0 0 P 0 0 0 P 0 0 0 P 743 0 0 0 P 0 0 0 P 0 0 0 P 0 0 0 P 744 0 0 0 P 1 0 0 F CS 0 0 0 P 0 0 0 P 770 0 0 0 P 0 0 0 P 0 0 0 P 0 0 0 P 783 0 0 0 P 1 0 0 F CS 0 0 0 P 0 0 0 P 794 0 0 0 P 0 0 0 P 0 0 0 P 0 0 0 P 801 0 0 0 P 0 0 0 P 0 0 0 P 0 0 0 P 803 0 0 0 P 0 0 0 P 0 0 0 P 0 0 0 P 810 0 0 0 P 0 0 0 P 0 0 0 P 0 0 0 P 826 0 0 0 P 0 0 0 P 0 0 0 P 0 0 0 P 827 0 0 0 P 0 0 0 P 0 0 0 P 0 0 0 P 828 0 0 0 P 0 0 0 P 0 0 0 P 0 0 0 P 833 0 0 0 P 0 0 0 P 0 0 0 P 0 0 0 P 845 0 0 0 P 0 0 0 P 0 0 0 P 0 0 0 P 868 0 0 0 P 1 0 0 F CS 0 0 0 P 0 0 0 P 877 0 0 0 P 0 0 0 P 0 0 0 P 0 0 0 P 878 1 0 0 F CS 1 0 0 F CS 1 0 0 F CS 1 0 0 F CS 882 0 0 0 P 0 0 0 P 0 0 0 P 0 0 0 P 890 0 0 0 P 0 0 0 P 0 0 0 P 0 0 0 P 892 0 0 0 P 0 0 0 P 0 0 0 P 0 0 0 P 893 0 0 0 P 0 0 0 P 0 0 0 P 0 0 0 P 895 0 0 0 P 0 0 0 P 0 0 0 P 0 0 0 P 896 0 0 0 P 0 0 0 P 0 0 0 P 0 0 0 P 898 0 0 0 P 0 0 0 P 0 0 0 P 0 0 0 P 900 0 0 0 P 0 0 0 P 0 0 0 P 0 0 0 P 902 0 0 0 P 0 0 0 P 0 0 0 P 0 0 0 P 904 0 0 0 P 0 0 0 P 0 0 0 P 0 0 0 P February 14, 2003 11 of 28 MuniMPCT_ Final. xls  test_ summ Record for the Final Metal Product and Machinery Rule Size Weight Direct/ Indirect Size& Type I I I I I I D I I I I I I D I I I I I I I I I I D I D D I I I I I I D I I D I D I I I I D I I I I I February 14, 2003 12 of 28 MuniMPCT_ Final. xls  test_ summ Record for the Final Metal Product and Machinery Rule TEST SUMMARY Final Rule  Oily Waste Directs ( Option 1) Proposed/ NODA ( Option 2) 413 to 433 Upgrade ( Option 3) All 433 Upgrade ( Option 4)

SITE_ ID MUNI_ ID Cost of Service Test HH Afford Muni Debt Pass/ Fail Size+ Pass/ Fail Cost of Service Test HH Afford Muni Debt Pass/ Fail Size+ Pass/ Fail Cost of Service Test HH Afford Muni Debt Pass/ Fail Size+ Pass/ Fail Cost of Service Test HH Afford Muni Debt Pass/ Fail Size+ Pass/ Fail 906 1 0 0 F CS 1 0 0 F CS 1 0 0 F CS 1 0 0 F CS 907 0 0 0 P 0 0 0 P 0 0 0 P 0 0 0 P 908 0 0 0 P 0 0 0 P 0 0 0 P 0 0 0 P 910 0 0 0 P 0 0 0 P 0 0 0 P 0 0 0 P 913 0 0 0 P 0 0 0 P 0 0 0 P 0 0 0 P 915 0 0 0 P 0 0 0 P 0 0 0 P 0 0 0 P 916 0 0 0 P 1 0 0 F CS 0 0 0 P 0 0 0 P 917 0 0 0 P 0 0 0 P 0 0 0 P 0 0 0 P 919 0 0 0 P 0 0 0 P 0 0 0 P 0 0 0 P 920 0 0 0 P 0 0 0 P 0 0 0 P 0 0 0 P 923 0 0 0 P 0 0 0 P 0 0 0 P 0 0 0 P 924 0 0 0 P 0 0 0 P 0 0 0 P 0 0 0 P 925 0 0 0 P 0 0 0 P 0 0 0 P 0 0 0 P 928 0 0 0 P 0 0 0 P 0 0 0 P 0 0 0 P 933 0 0 0 P 0 0 0 P 0 0 0 P 0 0 0 P 936 0 0 0 P 0 0 0 P 0 0 0 P 0 0 0 P 937 0 0 0 P 0 0 0 P 0 0 0 P 0 0 0 P 939 0 0 0 P 0 0 0 P 0 0 0 P 0 0 0 P 942 0 0 0 P 0 0 0 P 0 0 0 P 0 0 0 P 952 0 0 0 P 0 0 0 P 0 0 0 P 0 0 0 P February 14, 2003 13 of 28 MuniMPCT_ Final. xls  test_ summ Record for the Final Metal Product and Machinery Rule Size Weight Direct/ Indirect Size& Type D I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I February 14, 2003 14 of 28 MuniMPCT_ Final. xls  test_ summ Record for the Final Metal Product and Machinery Rule 11 12 13 14 15 4 5 6 7 8 0 0 0 0 Municipal Facility Compliance Costs 1 = Fail, 0 = Pass Fail Cost of Service Fail HH Afford Fail Muni Debt Joint No Pass= 1 SITE_ ID MUNI_ ID 1 2 3 4 Base 1 2 3 4 Base 1 2 3 4 1 2 3 4 4 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 17 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 18 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 23 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 30 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 39 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 40 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 93 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 98 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 104 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 117 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 123 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 134 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 139 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 152 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 167 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 171 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 205 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 213 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 218 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 258 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 272 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 277 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 278 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 292 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 311 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 318 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 341 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 346 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 347 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 348 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 360 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 362 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 368 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 379 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 385 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 391 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 394 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 397 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 405 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 427 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 437 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 465 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 467 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 478 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 483 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 485 1 1 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 491 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 499 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 508 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 521 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 535 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 541 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 553 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 February 14, 2003 15 of 28 MuniMPCT_ Final. xls  Tests Record for the Final Metal Product and Machinery Rule 11 12 13 14 15 4 5 6 7 8 0 0 0 0 Municipal Facility Compliance Costs 1 = Fail, 0 = Pass Fail Cost of Service Fail HH Afford Fail Muni Debt Joint No Pass= 1 SITE_ ID MUNI_ ID 1 2 3 4 Base 1 2 3 4 Base 1 2 3 4 1 2 3 4 554 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 557 0 1 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 558 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 565 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 569 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 571 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 573 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 581 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 582 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 588 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 602 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 646 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 647 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 657 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 672 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 686 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 689 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 691 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 692 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 736 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 743 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 744 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 770 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 783 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 794 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 801 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 803 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 810 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 826 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 827 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 828 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 833 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 845 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 868 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 877 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 878 1 1 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 882 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 890 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 892 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 893 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 895 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 896 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 898 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 900 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 902 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 904 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 906 1 1 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 907 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 908 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 910 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 913 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 915 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 February 14, 2003 16 of 28 MuniMPCT_ Final. xls  Tests Record for the Final Metal Product and Machinery Rule 11 12 13 14 15 4 5 6 7 8 0 0 0 0 Municipal Facility Compliance Costs 1 = Fail, 0 = Pass Fail Cost of Service Fail HH Afford Fail Muni Debt Joint No Pass= 1 SITE_ ID MUNI_ ID 1 2 3 4 Base 1 2 3 4 Base 1 2 3 4 1 2 3 4 916 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 917 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 919 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 920 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 923 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 924 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 925 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 928 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 933 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 936 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 937 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 939 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 942 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 952 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 February 14, 2003 17 of 28 MuniMPCT_ Final. xls  Tests Record for the Final Metal Product and Machinery Rule Municipal Facility Compliance Costs 1996 Dollars, Cost Runs 8/ 9 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 9 10 11 12 Total Costs 1996 Annualized Compliance Cost Compliance Cost Share of Baseline Cost of Service SITE_ ID MUNI_ ID & Expenditures Option 1 Option 2 Option 3 Option 4 Option 1 Option 2 Option 3 Option 4 691 368 672 657 467 346 139 40 205 292 167 826 17 123 117 362 272 845 318 573 478 557 391 689 803 801 30 554 258 405 508 218 483 571 569 104 277 647 565 341 521 794 394 18 348 171 744 581 878 23 311 379 877 Note: All data except site identification not shown to protect confidential business information. Sample page provided to show structure of worksheet. February 14, 2003 18 of 28 MuniMPCT_ Final. xls  CostOfSvc Record for the Final Metal Product and Machinery Rule Municipal Facility Compliance Costs 1996 Dollars, Cost Runs 8/ 9 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 9 10 11 12 Total Costs 1996 Annualized Compliance Cost Compliance Cost Share of Baseline Cost of Service SITE_ ID MUNI_ ID & Expenditures Option 1 Option 2 Option 3 Option 4 Option 1 Option 2 Option 3 Option 4 93 Note: All data except site identification not shown to protect confidential business information. Sample page provided to show structure of worksheet. February 14, 2003 19 of 28 MuniMPCT_ Final. xls  CostOfSvc Record for the Final Metal Product and Machinery Rule Household Affordability Test Per Household Post Compliance Total Cost Median HH Cost Share of Median Income MUNI_ ID PC BUDGET Households Baseline Option 1 Option 2 Option 3 Option 4 Income Baseline Option 1 Option 2 Option 3 Option 4 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 9 10 11 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 32 33 34 35 36 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 46 47 48 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 60 61 February 14, 2003 20 of 28 MuniMPCT_ Final. xls  HH Afford Record for the Final Metal Product and Machinery Rule Municipal Affordability Test Cost of Debt Service as a Percent of Revenue MUNI_ ID Baseline Option 1 Option 2 Option 3 Option 4 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 9 10 11 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 32 33 34 35 36 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 46 47 48 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 60 61 Total Cost of Debt Service Total Revenues ( from all sources)

February 14, 2003 21 of 28 MuniMPCT_ Final. xls  MuniDebt Record for the Final Metal Product and Machinery Rule 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 Municipality Data Except Financials ( see MuniFin)

Sample Weights from Helen Jacobs 7/ 26/ 99 MUNI DEMOGRAPHIC DATA MUNI_ ID SHORT NAME ID + 00 SOURCE STATE WEIGHT REG POP EMPS( 1996) YEAR POPULATION # HSHOLDS 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 9 10 11 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 32 33 34 35 36 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 46 47 48 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 60 61 February 14, 2003 22 of 28 MuniMPCT_ Final. xls  MuniData Record for the Final Metal Product and Machinery Rule 1 2 Municipality Data Except Financials ( see MuniFin)

MUNI_ ID SHORT NAME 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 9 10 11 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 32 33 34 35 36 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 46 47 48 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 60 61 13 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 Municipality Sector Participation Data from Survey MED HH INC ($) AERO AIR BUS ELEC HARD HOUSE INSTR MOB MOTOR OFF ORDN OTH PREC PRINT RAIL SHIPS STAT February 14, 2003 23 of 28 MuniMPCT_ Final. xls  MuniData Record for the Final Metal Product and Machinery Rule 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 Metal Products and Machinery Phase II Municipality Survey Financial Data Analysis MUNICIPALITY ECONOMIC AND FINANCIAL DATA FY1996 ($ unless otherwise specificed) TOTAL REVENUES PROPERTY REVENUE PROP REV RESIDENTIAL PROP REV COMMERICAL GRANT REVENUES OTHER REVENUES OTHER REV HOUSEHOLDS OTHER REV COMMERICIAL OTHER REV INDETERMINATE MARKET VALUE TAXABLE PROPERTY MARKET VALUE RESIDENTIAL MARKET VALUE COMMERCIAL 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 9 10 11 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 32 33 34 35 36 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 46 47 48 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 60 61 MUNI_ ID February 14, 2003 24 of 28 MuniMPCT_ Final. xls  MuniFin Record for the Final Metal Product and Machinery Rule 1 Metal Products and Machinery Phase II Municipality Survey Financial Data Analysis 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 9 10 11 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 32 33 34 35 36 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 46 47 48 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 60 61 MUNI_ ID 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 TAX COLLECTION RATE (%) CASH RESERVES TOTAL DEBT COST OF DEBT SERVICE ANNUAL POLLUTION CONTROL BUDGET FINANCED BY TAX REVS FINANCED BY FEE REVS FINANCED BY OTHER Residential Non Residential FEES CURRENT ( FY 1996) POLLUTION CONTROL ($)

February 14, 2003 25 of 28 MuniMPCT_ Final. xls  MuniFin Record for the Final Metal Product and Machinery Rule Metal Products and Machinery Phase II Municipality Survey Financial Data Analysis Facility Level Information SITE_ ID SITE NAME MUNI_ ID FACILITY SECTOR TOTAL COSTS & EXPENDITURES DEBT SERVICE GENERAL FUNDS FEES FROM SITE ACTIVITIES FEES FROM RESIDENTIAL PAYERS? ENTITY SIZE WEIGHT GOV'T TYPE SIZE& TYPE 4 17 18 23 30 39 40 93 98 104 117 123 134 139 152 167 171 205 213 218 258 272 277 278 292 311 318 341 346 347 348 360 362 368 379 385 391 394 397 405 427 437 465 467 478 483 485 491 499 508 FACILITY ECONOMIC AND FINANCIAL DATA FY1996 ($ unless otherwise specificed)

Note: All data except site identification not shown to protect confidential business information. Sample page provided to show structure of worksheet. February 14, 2003 26 of 28 MuniMPCT_ Final. xls  FacData Record for the Final Metal Product and Machinery Rule 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 Municipal Facility Compliance Costs ( 1996$) Final MP& M Rule Option 1 ( OW Directs) Option 2 ( Proposed/ NODA) Option 3 ( Directs + 413) Option 4 ( Directs + 413 + Local Limits) 1996 Social Cost SITE_ ID MUNI_ ID CapCst1 AnnCst1 CC1_ 96 CapCst2 AnnCst2 CC2_ 96 CapCst3 AnnCst3 CC3_ 96 CapCst4 AnnCst4 CC4_ 96 Option 1 Option 2 Option 3 Option 4 4 17 18 23 30 39 40 93 98 104 117 123 134 139 152 167 171 205 213 218 258 272 277 278 292 311 318 341 346 347 348 360 362 368 379 385 391 394 397 405 427 437 465 467 478 483 485 491 499 508 521 535 541 Note: All data except site identification not shown to protect confidential business information. Sample page provided to show structure of worksheet. February 14, 2003 27 of 28 MuniMPCT_ Final. xls  Costs Record for the Final Metal Product and Machinery Rule 2001 Annualized Compliance Cost Option 1 Option 2 Option 3 Option 4 Note: All data except site identification not shown to protect confidential business information. Sample page provided to show structure of worksheet. February 14, 2003 28 of 28 MuniMPCT_ Final. xls  Costs


[Federal Register Volume 85, Number 227 (Tuesday, November 24, 2020)]
[Notices]
[Pages 75009-75010]
[FR Doc No: 2020-25968]

=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY

[FRL-10016-36-OMS]

Agency Programs Subject to Intergovernmental Review Under
Executive Order 12372, Section 204 of the Demonstration Cities and
Metropolitan Development Act, and Section 401(a) of the
Intergovernmental Cooperation Act of 1968

AGENCY: Environmental Protection Agency (EPA).

ACTION: Notice and request for comments.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) is publishing an
updated list of EPA financial assistance programs which states may
choose to review under their Single Point of Contact (SPOC)
intergovernmental review processes. These programs are also eligible
for intergovernmental review by directly affected state, areawide,
regional, and local entities if a state does not have a SPOC or chooses
not to review an application for EPA financial assistance. EPA is also
streamlining the intergovernmental review process and is offering the
public an opportunity to comment on the revisions.

DATES: This list is effective as of November 24, 2020.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: EPA's National Policy Training and
Compliance Division (Attention: Elizabeth January) at
<EMAIL_ADDRESS>or<PHONE_NUMBER>.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: As provided in 40 CFR 29.3, EPA published a
notice in the Federal Register on April 29, 2004 (69 FR 23502), which
listed EPA financial assistance programs subject to review under
Executive Order 12372 and Section 204 of the Demonstration Cities and
Metropolitan Development Act (Section 204) and Section 401(a) of the
Intergovernmental Cooperation Act of 1968 (Section 401). This notice
advises the public of the availability of a more current list of EPA
programs and activities which states may choose to review under their
official Executive Order 12372 SPOC process or are subject to the
alternative review process described at 40 CFR 29.7(b) if a state does
not have a SPOC or elects not to include an EPA program in the SPOC
process.
    As part of a streamlining initiative, EPA is limiting
intergovernmental review to programs subject to Section 204 and Section
401 or situations in which there are compelling policy reasons to
conduct intergovernmental review. Executive Order 12372 exempts tribal
programs from intergovernmental review. The list of programs can be
found at: https://www.epa.gov/grants/epa-financial-assistance-programs-subject-executive-order-12372-and-section-204-demonstration. These are
the only EPA programs under which Intergovernmental Review comments may
be submitted to EPA although state or local laws may establish
requirements for coordination of requests for Federal funding that
cover a broader range of programs and activities.
    In the future, as necessary, EPA will update the list of programs
subject to intergovernmental review at: https://www.epa.gov/grants/epa-financial-assistance-programs-subject-executive-order-12372-and-section-204-demonstration rather than in Federal Register publications.
In Fiscal Year 2021, EPA intends to revise the Assistance Listings for
EPA programs in the: beta.SAM.gov Assistance Listings to indicate
whether intergovernmental review is required based on this list. These
revisions will take place during the annual cycle for updating the
Assistance Listings for EPA programs in the beta.SAM.gov Assistance
Listings.
    Comments may be submitted on EPA's streamlining of the
intergovernmental review process and must be received on or before
December 24, 2020.

ADDRESSES: Submit your comments, identified by Docket ID No. EPA-HQ-
OMS-2020-0348 by one of the following methods:
     www.regulations.gov: Follow the on-line instructions for
submitting comments.
     Email<EMAIL_ADDRESS>     Mail: OMS Docket, Environmental Protection Agency, Mail
Code: 28221T, 1200 Pennsylvania Ave. NW, Washington, DC 20460.
     Hand Delivery: EPA Docket Center, WJC West, Room 3334,
1301 Constitution Ave. NW, Washington, DC 20004. The telephone number
for the Docket Center is<PHONE_NUMBER>. For additional information about
EPA's public docket, visit http://www.epa.gov/dockets. Such deliveries
are only accepted during the Docket's normal hours of operation: 8:30
a.m. to 4:30 p.m., and special arrangements should be made for
deliveries of boxed information.
    Instructions: Direct your comments to Docket ID No. EPA-HQ-OMS-
2020-0348.
    EPA's policy is that all comments received will be included in the
public docket without change and may be made available online at http://www.regulations.gov, including any personal information provided,
unless the comment includes information claimed to be Confidential
Business Information (CBI) or other information whose disclosure is
restricted by statute. Do not submit information that you consider to
be CBI or otherwise protected through www.regulations.gov or email. The
www.regulations.gov website is an ``anonymous access'' system, which
means EPA will not know your identity or contact information unless you
provide it in the body of your comment. If you send an email comment
directly to EPA without going through www.regulations.gov your email
address will be automatically captured and included as part of the
comment that is placed in the public

docket and made available on the internet. If you submit an electronic
comment, EPA recommends that you include your name and other contact
information in the body of your comment and with any disk or CD-ROM you
submit. If EPA cannot read your comment due to technical difficulties
and cannot contact you for clarification, EPA may not be able to
consider your comment. Electronic files should avoid the use of special
characters, any form of encryption, and be free of any defects or
viruses.
    Docket: All documents in the docket are listed in the
www.regulations.gov index. Although listed in the index, some
information is not publicly available, e.g., CBI or other information
whose disclosure is restricted by statute. Certain other material, such
as copyrighted material, will be publicly available only in hard copy.
Publicly available docket materials are available either electronically
in www.regulations.gov or in hard copy at Docket ID No. EPA-HQ-OMS-
2020-0348, OMS Docket, EPA/DC, EPA West, Room 3334, 1301 Constitution
Ave. NW, Washington, DC. The Public Reading Room is open by appointment
only due to restrictions arising from the COVID-19 public health
emergency. Additional information on how to obtain an appointment is
available at https://www.epa.gov/dockets/epa-docket-center-and-reading-room-closed-public-limited-exceptions. The telephone number for the
Public Reading Room is<PHONE_NUMBER>, and the telephone number for the
OMS Docket is<PHONE_NUMBER>.

Donna Vizian,
Principal Deputy Assistant Administrator, Office of Mission Support.
[FR Doc. 2020-25968 Filed 11-23-20; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6560-50-P


[Federal Register: October 23, 2008 (Volume 73, Number 206)]
[Notices]
[Page 63215-63216]
[DOCID:fr23oc08-108]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

Proposed Collection; Comment Request

Upon Written Request, Copies Available From: Securities and Exchange
Commission, Office of Investor Education and Advocacy, Washington, DC
20549-0213.

Extension:
    Rule 17a-7; SEC File No. 270-238; OMB Control No. 3235-0214.

    Notice is hereby given that, pursuant to the Paperwork Reduction
Act of 1995 (44 U.S.C. 3501-3520), the Securities and Exchange
Commission (``Commission'') is soliciting comments on the collections
of information summarized below. The Commission plans to submit the
existing collection of information to the Office of Management and
Budget for extension and approval.
    Rule 17a-7 (17 CFR 270.17a-7) (the ``rule'') under the Investment
Company Act of 1940 (15 U.S.C. 80a-1 et seq.) (the ``Act'') is entitled
``Exemption of certain purchase or sale transactions between an
investment company and certain affiliated persons thereof.'' It
provides an exemption from section 17(a) of the Act for purchases and
sales of securities between registered investment companies
(``funds''), that are affiliated persons (``first-tier affiliates'') or
affiliated persons of affiliated persons (``second-tier affiliates''),
or between a fund and a first- or second-tier affiliate other than
another fund, when the affiliation arises solely because of a common
investment adviser, director, or officer. Rule 17a-7 requires funds to
keep various records in connection with purchase or sale transactions
effected in reliance on the rule. The rule requires the fund's board of
directors to establish procedures reasonably designed to ensure that
the rule's conditions have been satisfied. The board is also required
to determine, at least on a quarterly basis, that all affiliated
transactions effected during the preceding quarter in reliance on the
rule were made in compliance with these established procedures. If a
fund enters into a purchase or sale transaction with an affiliated
person, the rule requires the fund to compile and maintain written
records of the transaction.\1\ The Commission's examination staff uses
these records to evaluate for compliance with the rule.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \1\ The written records are required to set forth a description
of the security purchased or sold, the identity of the person on the
other side of the transaction, and the information or materials upon
which the board of directors' determination that the transaction was
in compliance with the procedures was made.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    While most funds do not commonly engage in transactions covered by
rule 17a-7, the Commission staff estimates that nearly all funds have
adopted procedures for complying with the rule.\2\ Of the approximately
3891 currently active funds, the staff estimates that virtually all
have already adopted procedures for compliance with rule 17a-7. This is
a one-time burden, and the staff therefore does not estimate an ongoing
burden related to the policies and procedures requirement of the rule
for funds.\3\ The staff estimates that there are approximately 150 new
funds that register each year, and that each of these funds adopts the
relevant polices and procedures. The staff estimates that it takes
approximately 4 hours to develop and adopt these policies and
procedures, as follows; 3 hours spent by a compliance attorney, and 1
hour collectively spent by the board of directors. Therefore, the total
annual burden related to developing and adopting these policies and
procedures would be approximately 600 hours.\4\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \2\ Unless stated otherwise, these estimates are based on
conversations with the examination and inspections staff of the
Commission and fund representatives.
    \3\ Based on our reviews and conversations with fund
representatives, we understand that funds rarely, if ever, need to
make changes to these policies and procedures once adopted, and
therefore we do not estimate a paperwork burden for such updates.
    \4\ This estimate is based on the following calculations: (4
hours x 150 = 600 hours).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    Of the 3891 existing funds, the staff assumes that approximately
25% (or 973), enter into transactions affected by rule 17a-7 each year
(either by the fund directly or through one of the fund's series), and
that the same percentage (25%, or 38 funds) of the estimated 150 funds
that newly register each year will also enter into these transactions,
for a total of 1011 \5\ companies that are affected by the
recordkeeping requirements of rule 17a-7. These funds must keep records
of each of these transactions, and the board of directors must
quarterly determine that all relevant transactions were made in
compliance with the company's policies and procedures. The rule
generally imposes a minimal burden of collecting and storing records
already generated for other purposes.\6\ The staff estimates that the
burden related to making these records and for the board to review all
transactions would be 3 hours annually for each respondent, (2 hours
spent by compliance attorneys and 1 hour spent by the board of
directors) \7\ or 3033 total hours each year.\8\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \5\ This estimate is based on the following calculation: (973 +
38 = 1011).
    \6\ Commission staff believes that rule 17a-7 does not impose
any costs associated with record preservation in addition to the
costs that funds already incur to comply with the record
preservation requirements of rule 31a-2 under the Act. Rule 31a-2
requires companies to preserve certain records for specified periods
of time.
    \7\ The staff estimates that funds that rely on rule 17a-7
annually enter into an average of 8 rule 17a-7 transactions each
year. The staff estimates that the compliance attorneys of the
companies spend approximately 15 minutes per transaction on this
recordkeeping, and the board of directors spends a total of 1 hour
annually in determining that all transactions made that year were
done in compliance with the company's policies and procedures.
    \8\ This estimate is based on the following calculation: (3
hours x 1011 companies = 3033 hours).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    Based on these estimates, the staff estimates the combined total
annual burden hours associated with rule 17a-7 is 3633 hours.\9\ The
staff also estimates that there are approximately 1161 respondents and
8238 total responses.\10\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \9\ This estimate is based on the following calculations: (600
hours + 3033 hours = 3633 total hours).
    \10\ This estimate is based on the following calculations: (150
newly registered funds + 1011 funds that engage in rule 17a-7
transactions = 1161); (1011 funds that engage in rule 17a-7
transactions x 8 times per year = 8088); (8088 + 150 = 8238
responses).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    The estimates of burden hours are made solely for the purposes of
the Paperwork Reduction Act, and are not derived from a comprehensive
or even a representative survey or study of the costs of Commission
rules. The collection of information required by rule 17a-7 is
necessary to obtain the benefits of the rule. Responses will not be
kept confidential. An agency may not conduct or sponsor, and a person
is not required to respond to, a collection of information unless it
displays a currently valid control number.
    Written comments are invited on: (a) Whether the collections of
information are necessary for the proper performance of the functions
of the Commission, including whether the information has practical
utility; (b) the accuracy of the Commission's estimate of the burdens
of the collections of information; (c) ways to enhance the quality,
utility, and clarity of the information collected; and (d) ways to

minimize the burdens of the collections of information on respondents,
including through the use of automated collection techniques or other
forms of information technology. Consideration will be given to
comments and suggestions submitted in writing within 60 days of this
publication.
    Please direct your written comments to Lewis W. Walker, Acting
Director/CIO, Securities and Exchange Commission, C/O Shirley
Martinson, 6432 General Green Way, Alexandria, VA 22312; or send an e-
mail to<EMAIL_ADDRESS>
     Dated: October 16, 2008.
J. Lynn Taylor,
Assistant Secretary.
[FR Doc. E8-25245 Filed 10-22-08; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 8011-01-P


[Federal Register Volume 78, Number 159 (Friday, August 16, 2013)]
[Proposed Rules]
[Pages 49990-49992]
[FR Doc No: 2013-20022]

=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY

40 CFR Part 52

[EPA-R04-OAR-2013-0455; FRL-9900-12-Region 4]

Approval and Promulgation of Implementation Plans; Tennessee;
Revisions to the Knox County Portion of the Tennessee State
Implementation Plan

AGENCY: Environmental Protection Agency (EPA).

ACTION: Proposed rule.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: EPA is proposing to approve a revision to the Knox County
portion of the Tennessee State Implementation Plan (SIP), submitted by
the State of Tennessee, through the Tennessee Department of Environment
and Conservation (TDEC) on December 13,

2012. The SIP submittal revises the definition of ``Modification'' in
Knox County Air Quality Management Regulation Section 13 Definitions.
TDEC considers Knox County's SIP revision to be as or more stringent
than the Tennessee SIP requirements. EPA is approving the Knox County
SIP revision because the State has demonstrated that it is consistent
with the Clean Air Act (CAA or Act).

DATES: Written comments must be received on or before September 16,
2013.

ADDRESSES: Submit your comments, identified by Docket ID No. EPA-R04-
OAR-2013-0455, by one of the following methods:
    1. www.regulations.gov: Follow the on-line instructions for
submitting comments.
    2. Email<EMAIL_ADDRESS>    3. Fax:<PHONE_NUMBER>.
    4. Mail: ``EPA-R04-OAR-2013-0455,'' Regulatory Development Section,
Air Planning Branch, Air, Pesticides and Toxics Management Division,
U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Region 4, 61 Forsyth Street SW.,
Atlanta, Georgia 30303-8960.
    5. Hand Delivery or Courier: Lynorae Benjamin, Regulatory
Development Section, Air Planning Branch, Air, Pesticides and Toxics
Management Division, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Region 4, 61
Forsyth Street SW., Atlanta, Georgia 30303-8960. Such deliveries are
only accepted during the Regional Office's normal hours of operation.
The Regional Office's official hours of business are Monday through
Friday, 8:30 a.m. to 4:30 p.m., excluding Federal holidays.
    Instructions: Direct your comments to Docket ID No. EPA-R04-OAR-
2013-0455. EPA's policy is that all comments received will be included
in the public docket without change and may be made available online at
www.regulations.gov, including any personal information provided,
unless the comment includes information claimed to be Confidential
Business Information (CBI) or other information whose disclosure is
restricted by statute. Do not submit through www.regulations.gov or
email, information that you consider to be CBI or otherwise protected.
The www.regulations.gov Web site is an ``anonymous access'' system,
which means EPA will not know your identity or contact information
unless you provide it in the body of your comment. If you send an email
comment directly to EPA without going through www.regulations.gov, your
email address will be automatically captured and included as part of
the comment that is placed in the public docket and made available on
the Internet. If you submit an electronic comment, EPA recommends that
you include your name and other contact information in the body of your
comment and with any disk or CD-ROM you submit. If EPA cannot read your
comment due to technical difficulties and cannot contact you for
clarification, EPA may not be able to consider your comment. Electronic
files should avoid the use of special characters, any form of
encryption, and be free of any defects or viruses. For additional
information about EPA's public docket visit the EPA Docket Center
homepage at http://www.epa.gov/epahome/dockets.htm.
    Docket: All documents in the electronic docket are listed in the
www.regulations.gov index. Although listed in the index, some
information is not publicly available, i.e., CBI or other information
whose disclosure is restricted by statute. Certain other material, such
as copyrighted material, is not placed on the Internet and will be
publicly available only in hard copy form. Publicly available docket
materials are available either electronically in www.regulations.gov or
in hard copy at the Regulatory Development Section, Air Planning
Branch, Air, Pesticides and Toxics Management Division, U.S.
Environmental Protection Agency, Region 4, 61 Forsyth Street SW.,
Atlanta, Georgia 30303-8960. EPA requests that if at all possible, you
contact the person listed in the FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT
section to schedule your inspection. The Regional Office's official
hours of business are Monday through Friday, 8:30 a.m. to 4:30 p.m.,
excluding Federal holidays.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Sean Lakeman, Regulatory Development
Section, Air Planning Branch, Air, Pesticides and Toxics Management
Division, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Region 4, 61 Forsyth
Street SW., Atlanta, Georgia 30303-8960. The telephone number is (404)
562-9043. Mr. Lakeman can be reached via electronic mail at
<EMAIL_ADDRESS>
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

I. Analysis of Knox County's Submittals
II. Proposed Action
III. Statutory and Executive Order Reviews

I. Analysis of Knox County's Submittals

    On December 13, 2012, TDEC submitted a SIP revision to EPA for
approval into the Knox County portion of the Tennessee SIP.
Specifically, the December 13, 2012, SIP revises the definition of
``Modification'' in Knox County Regulation, section 13.0--Definitions.
The additions of subparagraphs E and F to the definition of
``Modification'' allows the local permit program authority to provide
adequate, streamlined, and reasonable procedures for expeditiously
processing permit changes by excluding certain modifications from
construction permitting. The addition of subparagraph E provides that
certain modifications (physical/method of operation) at major sources
that are not considered Title I modifications do not require
construction permits. Specifically, modifications at such sources that
qualify: (1) As Title V operational flexibility changes (CAA section
502(b)(10)); (2) as minor permit modifications; or (3) for group
processing of minor modifications will not require construction
permits. See 40 CFR 70.7 for more detailed information on permit
modifications.
    The addition at subparagraph F establishes criteria for which a
physical change or change in the method of operation for a minor source
does not need a construction permit. These criteria include: (1) The
change is not subject to the requirements of the Knox County Title V
program (at section 25.70), Prevention of Significant Deterioration
(PSD) at Section 45.0 and new source review (NSR) permitting
regulations at Section 41.0\1\; (2) the emissions from the modification
does not exceed the allowable emissions established in an existing
permit; or (3) the change does not result in emissions from a new
contaminant or pollutant.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \1\ EPA notes that the language at subparagraph F that states
``The change is not subject to requirements of a Title V Operating
Permit (Section 25.70), a New Source Review Permit (Section 41.0),
or a Prevention of Significant Deterioration Permit (Section
45.0);'' refers to the actual Knox County title V, PSD and NSR
permitting regulations and not to an actual permit, as clarified in
a email from Knox County on June 7, 2013.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

II. Proposed Action

    EPA is proposing to approve the aforementioned change to Knox
County portion of the Tennessee SIP, because it is consistent with EPA
policy and the CAA.

III. Statutory and Executive Order Reviews

    Under the CAA, the Administrator is required to approve a SIP
submission that complies with the provisions of the Act and applicable
Federal regulations. 42 U.S.C. 7410(k); 40 CFR 52.02(a). Thus, in
reviewing SIP submissions, EPA's role is to approve state choices,
provided that they meet the criteria of the CAA. Accordingly, this
action

merely proposes to approve state law as meeting Federal requirements
and does not impose additional requirements beyond those imposed by
state law. For that reason, this action:
     Is not a ``significant regulatory action'' subject to
review by the Office of Management and Budget under Executive Order
12866 (58 FR 51735, October 4, 1993);
     does not impose an information collection burden under the
provisions of the Paperwork Reduction Act (44 U.S.C. 3501 et seq.);
     is certified as not having a significant economic impact
on a substantial number of small entities under the Regulatory
Flexibility Act (5 U.S.C. 601 et seq.);
     does not contain any unfunded mandate or significantly or
uniquely affect small governments, as described in the Unfunded
Mandates Reform Act of 1995 (Pub. L. 104-4);
     does not have Federalism implications as specified in
Executive Order 13132 (64 FR 43255, August 10, 1999);
     is not an economically significant regulatory action based
on health or safety risks subject to Executive Order 13045 (62 FR
19885, April 23, 1997);
     is not a significant regulatory action subject to
Executive Order 13211 (66 FR 28355, May 22, 2001);
     is not subject to requirements of Section 12(d) of the
National Technology Transfer and Advancement Act of 1995 (15 U.S.C. 272
note) because application of those requirements would be inconsistent
with the CAA; and
     does not provide EPA with the discretionary authority to
address, as appropriate, disproportionate human health or environmental
effects, using practicable and legally permissible methods, under
Executive Order 12898 (59 FR 7629, February 16, 1994).
    In addition, this proposal does not have tribal implications as
specified by Executive Order 13175 (65 FR 67249, November 9, 2000),
because the SIP is not approved to apply in Indian country located in
the State, and EPA notes that it will not impose substantial direct
costs on tribal governments or preempt tribal law.

List of Subjects in 40 CFR Part 52

    Environmental protection, Air pollution control, Intergovernmental
relations, Nitrogen dioxide, Particulate matter, Reporting and
recordkeeping requirements and Sulfur oxides.

    Authority:  42 U.S.C. 7401 et seq.

    Dated: August 7, 2013.
Beverly H. Banister,
Acting Regional Administrator, Region 4.
[FR Doc. 2013-20022 Filed 8-15-13; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6560-50-P


[Federal Register Volume 76, Number 89 (Monday, May 9, 2011)]
[Notices]
[Page 26776]
[FR Doc No: 2011-11189]

=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

Submission for OMB Review; Comment Request

Upon Written Request, Copies Available From: Securities and Exchange
Commission, Office of Investor Education and Advocacy, Washington, DC
20549-0213.
Extension:
    Electronic Data Collection System; OMB Control No. 3235-0672; SEC
File No. 270-621.

    Notice is hereby given that, pursuant to the Paperwork Reduction
Act of 1995 (44 U.S.C. 3501 et seq.), the Securities and Exchange
Commission (``Commission'') is soliciting comments on the new
collection of information summarized below. The Commission plans to
submit this extension for a current collection of information to the
Office of Management and Budget for approval.
    The Securities and Exchange Commission has begun the design of a
new Electronic Data Collection System database (the Database) and
invites comment on the Database that will support information provided
by the general public that would like to file a tip or complaint with
the Commission. The Database is a web based e-filed dynamic report
based on technology that pre-populates and establishes a series of
questions based on the data that the individual enters. The individual
will then complete specific information on the subject(s) and nature of
the suspicious activity, using the data elements appropriate to the
type of complaint or subject. The first phase of the Database was
released as a pilot in March 2011. Any public suggestions that are
received during the pilot phase will be reviewed and changes will be
considered. The final version will be available Fall 2011. There are no
costs associated with this collection. The public interface to the
Database is available using the Tips, Complaints and Referrals Portal.
Information is provided voluntarily.
    Estimated number of annual responses = 25,000.
    Estimated annual reporting burden = 12,500 hours (30 minutes per
submission).
    Written comments are invited on: (a) Whether this collection of
information is necessary for the proper performance of the functions of
the agency, including whether the information will have practical
utility; (b) the accuracy of the agency's estimate of the burden
imposed by the collection of information; (c) ways to enhance the
quality, utility, and clarity of the information collected; and (d)
ways to minimize the burden of the collection of information on
respondents, including through the use of automated collection
techniques or other forms of information technology.
    Background documentation for this information collection may be
viewed at the following Web site, http://www.reginfo.gov. Please direct
general comments to the following persons: (i) Desk Officer for the
Securities and Exchange Commission, Office of Management and Budget,
Room 10102, New Executive Office Building, Washington, DC 20503 or send
an e-mail to Shagufta Ahmed at<EMAIL_ADDRESS>Thomas
Bayer, Chief Information Officer, Securities and Exchange Commission,
c/o Remi Pavlik-Simon, 6432 General Green Way, Alexandria, VA 22312; or
send an e-mail to<EMAIL_ADDRESS>Comments must be submitted
within 30 days of this notice.

     May 3, 2011.
Cathy H. Ahn,
Deputy Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2011-11189 Filed 5-6-11; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 8011-01-P


[Federal Register Volume 80, Number 15 (Friday, January 23, 2015)]
[Notices]
[Page 3584]
[FR Doc No: 2015-01169]

=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY

[EPA-HQ-OPPT-2003-0004; FRL-9921-13]

Access to Confidential Business Information by Accelera
Solutions, Inc.

AGENCY: Environmental Protection Agency (EPA).

ACTION: Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: EPA has authorized its contractor, Accelera Solutions, Inc.
(Accelera) of Fairfax, VA, to access information which has been
submitted to EPA under all sections of the Toxic Substances Control Act
(TSCA). Some of the information may be claimed or determined to be
Confidential Business Information (CBI).

DATES: Access to the confidential data occurred on or about 1 December
2014.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
    For technical information contact: Scott Sherlock, Environmental
Assistance Division (7408M), Office of Pollution Prevention and Toxics,
Environmental Protection Agency, 1200 Pennsylvania Ave. NW.,
Washington, DC 20460-0001; telephone number:<PHONE_NUMBER>; email
address<EMAIL_ADDRESS>    For general information contact: The TSCA-Hotline, ABVI-Goodwill,
422 South Clinton Ave., Rochester, NY 14620; telephone number: (202)
554-1404; email address<EMAIL_ADDRESS>
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

I. General Information

A. Does this action apply to me?

    This action is directed to the public in general. This action may,
however, be of interest to all who manufacture, process, or distribute
industrial chemicals. Since other entities may also be interested, the
Agency has not attempted to describe all the specific entities that may
be affected by this action.

B. How can I get copies of this document and other related information?

    The docket for this action, identified by docket identification
(ID) number EPA-HQ-OPPT-2003-0004, is available at http://www.regulations.gov or at the Office of Pollution Prevention and Toxics
Docket (OPPT Docket), Environmental Protection Agency Docket Center
(EPA/DC), West William Jefferson Clinton Bldg., Rm. 3334, 1301
Constitution Ave. NW., Washington, DC. The Public Reading Room is open
from 8:30 a.m. to 4:30 p.m., Monday through Friday, excluding legal
holidays. The telephone number for the Public Reading Room is (202)
566-1744, and the telephone number for the OPPT Docket is (202) 566-
0280. Please review the visitor instructions and additional information
about the docket available at http://www.epa.gov/dockets.

II. What action is the Agency taking?

    Under EPA contract number EP-D-11-075, task order numbers 0012 and
0013, contractor Accelera Solutions, Inc. of 12150 Monument Dr., Suite
800, Fairfax, VA, is assisting the Office of Pollution Prevention and
Toxics (OPPT) in the operations, maintenance, and infrastructure
support for the CBI Local Area Network (CBI LAN). This includes the
existing hardware, associated operating systems, security artifacts,
and commercial off the shelf products, currently in use on the OPPT CBI
LAN and Adminstrative LAN. In addition, the contractor is providing
assistance on the virtual desktop solution, which will streamline the
process of bilateral use of CBI and business processes, to support
headquarters and region offices. Furthermore, they are assisting in
establishing and setting up remote access to the OPPT CBI LAN and
providing institutional expertise in secure virtual environments.
    In accordance with 40 CFR 2.306(j), EPA has determined that under
EPA contract number EP-D-11-075, task order numbers 0012 and 0013,
Accelera required access to CBI submitted to EPA under all sections of
TSCA to perform successfully the duties specified under the contract.
Accelera personnel were given access to information submitted to EPA
under all sections of TSCA. Some of the information may be claimed or
determined to be CBI.
    EPA is issuing this notice to inform all submitters of information
under all sections of TSCA that EPA has provided Accelera access to
these CBI materials on a need-to-know basis only. All access to TSCA
CBI under this contract is taking place at EPA Headquarters in
accordance with EPA's ``TSCA CBI Protection Manual.''
    Access to TSCA data, including CBI, will continue until June 19,
2016. If the contract is extended, this access will also continue for
the duration of the extended contract without further notice.
    Accelera personnel have signed nondisclosure agreements and were
briefed on appropriate security procedures before they were permitted
access to TSCA CBI.

    Authority: 15 U.S.C. 2601 et seq.

    Dated: January 14, 2015.
Pamela S. Myrick,
Acting Director, Information Management Division, Office of Pollution
Prevention and Toxics.
[FR Doc. 2015-01169 Filed 1-22-15; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6560-50-P