[Federal Register: January 24, 2011 (Volume 76, Number 15)]
[Notices]
[Page 4150-4151]
[DOCID:fr24ja11-100]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION

National Highway Traffic Safety Administration

[U.S. DOT Docket No. NHTSA-2010-0023]

Reports, Forms and Recordkeeping Requirements; Agency Information
Collection Activity Under OMB Review

AGENCY: National Highway Traffic Safety Administration, DOT.

ACTION: Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: In compliance with the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 (44
U.S.C. 3501 et seq.), this notice announces that the Information
Collection Request (ICR) abstracted below has been forwarded to the
Office of Management and Budget (OMB) for review and comment. The ICR
describes the nature of the information collections and their expected
burden. The Federal Register Notice with a 60-day comment period was
published on April 23, 2010 (75 FR 21385-21386).

DATES: Comments must be submitted on or before February 23, 2011.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Ms. Laurie Flaherty, Program Analyst,
at the National Highway Traffic Safety Administration, Office of
Emergency Medical Services, NTI-140,<PHONE_NUMBER> or via e-mail at
<EMAIL_ADDRESS>1200 New Jersey Ave., SE., W44-322,
Washington, DC 20590.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

National Highway Traffic Safety Administration

    Title: Request for Information, National 9-1-1 Program.
    OMB Number: Enter Data.
    Type of Request: New information collection request.
    Abstract: NHTSA is proposing to issue annual RFIs seeking comments
from all sources (public, private, governmental, academic,
professional, public interest groups, and other interested parties) on
operational priorities for the National 9-1-1 Program. The National 9-
1-1 Program currently provides: Program and policy coordination across
Federal agencies and support to Public Safety Answering Points and
related State and local agencies for 9-1-1 deployment and

operations. NHTSA intends to use the National 9-1-1 Program to work
cooperatively with public and private 9-1-1 stakeholders to establish a
vision for the future of 9-1-1 services in the Nation. The RFIs will
solicit comments on the priorities and strategies of the National 9-1-1
Program to accomplish its functions, goals and vision. In addition, the
RFIs will obtain expressions of interest in participating as partners
and will request responses to specific questions, including critical 9-
1-1 issues, benefits to stakeholders, available data and methods of
collection. These RFIs will NOT seek comment on the 9-1-1 grant program
administered by the NHTSA. The RFIs will not include requests for
proposals or invitations for bids.
    In order to collect information needed to develop and implement
effective strategies for the National 9-1-1 Program to provide
leadership, coordination, guidance and direction to the enhancement of
the Nation's 9-1-1 services, NHTSA must utilize efficient and effective
means of eliciting the input and opinions of its constituency groups.
If approved, the proposed annual RFIs would assist the National 9-1-1
Program in addressing the myriad of issues posed by implementing new
technologies in 9-1-1 services in a systematic, prioritized fashion,
with active involvement of its constituency. The results of the
proposed annual RFIs would be used to: (1) Identify areas to target
programs and activities to achieve the greatest benefit; (2) Develop
programs and initiatives aimed at cooperative efforts to enhance 9-1-1
services nationwide; and (3) to provide informational support to
States, regions, and localities in their own efforts to enhance 9-1-1
services.
    Affected Public: Under this proposed effort, the National 9-1-1
Program would issue annual RFIs, seeking responses to specific
questions and soliciting comments on the priorities and strategies used
by the National 9-1-1 Program to accomplish its functions, goals and
vision, and to obtain expressions of interest in participating as
partners. The various entities included in the constituency of the
National 9-1-1 Program would be notified of the issuance of each RFI.
Likely respondents would include companies, agencies and organizations
from all of the constituency groups listed above, particularly local
and State emergency communications agencies, professional and industry
associations, ``traditional'' telecommunication service providers,
``public safety/emergency'' service providers and special interest
advocacy organizations. Response is voluntary. The total number of
respondents is estimated at 50.
    Estimated Total Annual Burden: NHTSA estimates that responses to
the questions included in the proposed RFIs would require an average of
one hour to complete, for a total of 50 hours. The respondents would
not incur any reporting costs from the information collection. The
respondents also would not incur any recordkeeping burden or
recordkeeping costs from the information collection.
    Send comments, within 30 days, to the Office of Information and
Regulatory Affairs, Office of Management and Budget, 725-17th Street,
NW., Washington, DC 20503, Attention NHTSA Desk Officer.
    Comments are invited on: Whether the proposed collection of
information is necessary for the proper performance of the functions of
the Department, including whether the information will have practical
utility; the accuracy of the Department's estimate of the burden of the
proposed information collection; ways to enhance the quality, utility
and clarity of the information to be collected; and ways to minimize
the burden of the collection of information on respondents, including
the use of automated collection techniques or other forms of
information technology. A Comment to OMB is most effective if OMB
receives it within 30 days of publication.

    Issued in Washington, DC, on January 19, 2011.
Michael L. Brown,
Acting Associate Administrator for Research and Program Development.
[FR Doc. 2011-1363 Filed 1-21-11; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE P


______________________________________________________________________________ Confirmation: I confirm that the information above is __ correct ___ correct with the changes noted above. Signature: ___________________________________ CONTACT REPORT Person Calling: Randy McDonald U. S. Environmental Protection Agency OAQPS/ ESD/ OCG 919 541 5402 Person Called: John Bowers CCP, Marshall, Texas Facility 816 391 6000 Date of Contact: 04/ 29/ 03 Contact Summary:

I contacted John Bowers to confirm that their 1,400 gallon tank containing xylene is a storage tank and not a process tank. The tank is used for storage of recovered and virgin xylene, which is used in the process as an azeotropic solvent. However, the tank is a stainless steel intermodal tank that sits on a cradle at the facility. Intermodal tanks are portable tanks designed for transportation by road, rail, or ship.


Cosmetic Act, the application number for the conditionally approved new
animal drug.
    (c) Veterinary minor species index file number. For a drug intended
for use in animals that is the subject of an Index listing under
section 572 of the Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act, the Minor
Species Index File number of the new animal drug on the Index of
Legally Marketed Unapproved New Animal Drugs for Minor Species.
    (d) Investigational new animal drug number. For a drug intended for
animal use that is the subject of an investigational new animal drug or
generic investigational new animal drug application under part 511 of
this chapter, the number of the investigational new animal drug or
generic investigational new animal drug file.

Sec.  1.76  Medical devices.

    In addition to the data required to be submitted in Sec.  1.72, an
ACE filer must submit the following information at the time of filing
entry in ACE for medical devices regulated by the FDA Center for
Devices and Radiological Health.
    (a) Registration and listing. For a medical device, the
Registration Number for Foreign Manufacturers, Foreign Exporters, and/
or Domestic Manufacturers, and the Device Listing Number, required
under section 510 of the Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act and part
807 of this chapter.
    (b) Investigational devices. For an investigational medical device
that has an investigational device exemption granted under section
520(g) of the Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act, the Investigational
Device Exemption Number. For an investigational medical device being
imported or offered for import for use in a nonsignificant risk or
exempt study, ``NSR'' to be entered in the Affirmation of Compliance
for the ``investigational device exemption'' that identifies the device
as being used in a nonsignificant risk or exempt study.
    (c) Premarket number. For a medical device that has one, the
Premarket Number. This is the Premarket Approval Number for those
medical devices that have received premarket approval under section 515
of the Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act; the Product Development
Protocol Number for those medical devices for which FDA has declared
the product development protocol complete under section 515(f) of the
Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act; the De Novo number for those
medical devices granted marketing authorization under section 513(f)(2)
of the Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act; the Premarket Notification
Number for those medical devices that received premarket clearance
under section 510(k) of the Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act; or
the Humanitarian Device Exemption Number for those medical devices for
which an exemption has been granted under section 520(m) of the Federal
Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act.
    (d) Component. If applicable for a medical device, an affirmation
identifying that the article being imported or offered for import is a
component that requires further processing or inclusion into a finished
medical device.
    (e) Lead wire/patient cable. For electrode lead wires and patient
cables intended for use with a medical device, an Affirmation of
Compliance with the

applicable performance standard under Sec.  898.12 of this chapter.
    (f) Impact resistant lens. For impact resistant lenses in
eyeglasses and sunglasses, an Affirmation of Compliance with the
applicable requirements of Sec.  801.410 of this chapter.
    (g) Convenience kit. If applicable for a medical device, an
Affirmation of Compliance that the article imported or offered for
import is a convenience kit or part of a convenience kit.

Sec.  1.77   Radiation-emitting electronic products.

    In addition to the data required to be submitted in Sec.  1.72, an
ACE filer must submit all of the declarations required in Form FDA 2877
electronically in ACE at the time of filing entry for products subject
to the standards under parts 1020-1050 of this chapter.

Sec.  1.78   Biological products, HCT/Ps, and related drugs and medical
devices.

    In addition to the data required to be submitted in Sec.  1.72, an
ACE filer must submit the following information at the time of filing
entry in ACE for biological products, HCT/Ps, and related drugs and
medical devices regulated by the FDA Center for Biologics Evaluation
and Research.
    (a) Product name which identifies the article being imported or
offered for import by the name commonly associated with that article
including the established name, trade name, brand name, proper name, or
product description if the article does not have an established name,
trade name, brand name, or proper name.
    (b) HCT/P registration and affirmation. (1) For an HCT/P regulated
solely under section 361 of the Public Health Service Act and the
regulations in part 1271 of this chapter that is manufactured by an
establishment that is required to be registered under part 1271 of this
chapter, the HCT/P Registration Number; and
    (2) For an HCT/P regulated solely under section 361 of the Public
Health Service Act and the regulations in part 1271 of this chapter, an
Affirmation of Compliance with the applicable requirements of part 1271
of this chapter.
    (c) Licensed biological products. For a biological product that is
the subject of an approved biologics license application under section
351 of the Public Health Service Act, the Submission Tracking Number of
the biologics license application and/or the Biologics License Number.
    (d) Drug registration. For a drug intended for human use, the Drug
Registration Number if the foreign establishment where the human drug
was manufactured, prepared, propagated, compounded, or processed before
being imported or offered for import into the United States is required
to register the drug under part 207 or part 607 of this chapter as
applicable. For the purposes of this section, the Drug Registration
Number that must be submitted at the time of entry in ACE is the unique
facility identifier of the foreign establishment where the human drug
was manufactured, prepared, propagated, compounded, or processed before
being imported or offered for import into the United States. The unique
facility identifier is the identifier submitted by a registrant in
accordance with the system specified under section 510(b) of the
Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act.
    (e) Drug application number. For a drug intended for human use that
is the subject of an approved application under section 505(b) or
505(j) of the Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act, the number of the
new drug application or the abbreviated new drug application.
    (f) Investigational new drug application number. For a drug
intended for human use that is the subject of an investigational new
drug application under section 505(i) of the Federal Food, Drug, and
Cosmetic Act, the number of the investigational new drug application.
    (g) Medical device registration and listing. For a medical device
subject to the registration and listing procedures contained in part
807 of this chapter, the Registration Number for Foreign Manufacturers,
Foreign Exporters, and/or Domestic Manufacturers, and the Device
Listing Number, required under section 510 of the Federal Food, Drug,
and Cosmetic Act and part 807 of this chapter.
    (h) Investigational devices. For an investigational medical device
that has an investigational device exemption granted under section
520(g) of the Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act, the Investigational
Device Exemption Number. For an investigational medical device being
imported or offered for import for use in a nonsignificant risk or
exempt study, ``NSR'' to be entered in the Affirmation of Compliance
for the ``investigational device exemption'' that identifies the device
as being used in a nonsignificant risk or exempt study.
    (i) Medical device premarket number. For a medical device that has
one, the Premarket Number. This is the Premarket Approval Number for
those medical devices that have received premarket approval under
section 515 of the Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act; the Product
Development Protocol Number for those medical devices for which FDA has
declared the product development protocol complete under section 515(f)
of the Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act; the De Novo number for
those medical devices granted marketing authorization under section
513(f)(2) of the Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act; the Premarket
Notification Number for those medical devices that received premarket
clearance under section 510(k) of the Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic
Act; or the Humanitarian Device Exemption Number for those medical
devices for which an exemption has been granted under section 520(m) of
the Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act.
    (j) Medical device component. If applicable for a medical device,
an affirmation identifying that the article being imported or offered
for import is a component that requires further processing or inclusion
into a finished medical device.

Sec.  1.79  Tobacco products.

    In addition to the data required to be submitted in Sec.  1.72, an
ACE filer must submit the following information at the time of filing
entry in ACE.
    (a) Brand name of an article that is a tobacco product that is
being imported or offered for import. If the article does not have a
specific brand name, the ACE filer must submit a commercial name for
the brand name. This data element is not applicable to those products
solely intended either for further manufacturing or as investigational
tobacco products.
    (b) [Reserved]

Sec.  1.80  Cosmetics.

    An ACE filer must submit the data specified in Sec.  1.72 at the
time of filing entry in ACE.

Sec.  1.81   Rejection of entry filing.

    FDA may reject an entry filing for failure to provide complete and
accurate information that is required pursuant to this subpart.

0
3. In Sec.  1.83, revise paragraph (a) to read as follows:

Sec.  1.83  Definitions.

* * * * *
    (a) The term owner or consignee means the person who makes entry
under the provisions of section 484 of the Tariff Act of 1930, as
amended (19 U.S.C. 1484), namely, the ``importer of record.''
* * * * *

0
4. Revise Sec.  1.90 to read as follows:

Sec.  1.90   Notice of sampling.

    When a sample of an article offered for import has been requested
by the district director, FDA shall provide to the owner or consignee
prompt notice of delivery of, or intention to deliver, such sample.
Upon receipt of the notice, the owner or consignee shall hold such
article and not distribute it until further notice from the district
director or U.S. Customs and Border Protection of the results of
examination of the sample.

0
5. In Sec.  1.94, revise the first sentence of paragraphs (a) and (c)
to read as follows:

Sec.  1.94  Hearing on refusal of admission or destruction.

    (a) If it appears that the article may be subject to refusal of
admission, or that the article is a drug that may be subject to
destruction under section 801(a) of the Federal Food, Drug, and
Cosmetic Act, the district director shall give the owner or consignee a
written or electronic notice to that effect, stating the reasons
therefor. * * *
* * * * *
    (c) If the article is a drug that may be subject to destruction
under section 801(a) of the Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act, the
district director may give the owner or consignee a single written or
electronic notice that provides the notice of refusal of admission and
the notice of destruction of an article described in paragraph (a) of
this section. * * *

PART 1005--IMPORTATION OF ELECTRONIC PRODUCTS

0
6. The authority citation for part 1005 continues to read as follows:

    Authority: 21 U.S.C. 360ii, 360mm.

0
7. Revise Sec.  1005.2 to read as follows:

Sec.  1005.2  Definitions.

    As used in this part:
    The term owner or consignee means the person who makes entry under
the provisions of section 484 of the Tariff Act of 1930, as amended (19
U.S.C. 1484), namely, the ``importer of record.''

PART 1271--HUMAN CELLS, TISSUES, AND CELLULAR AND TISSUE-BASED
PRODUCTS

0
8. The authority citation for part 1271 continues to read as follows:

    Authority:  42 U.S.C. 216, 243, 263a, 264, 271.

0
9. In Sec.  1271.420, revise paragraph (a) to read as follows:

Sec.  1271.420  HCT/Ps offered for import.

    (a) Except as provided in paragraphs (c) and (d) of this section,
when an HCT/P is offered for import, the importer of record must
notify, either before or at the time of importation, the director of
the district of the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) having
jurisdiction over the port of entry through which the HCT/P is imported
or offered for import, or such officer of the district as the director
may designate to act in his or her behalf in administering and
enforcing this part, and must provide sufficient information, including
information submitted in the Automated Commercial Environment (ACE)
system or any other electronic data interchange system authorized by
the U.S. Customs and Border Protection Agency as required in part 1,
subpart D of this chapter, for FDA to make an admissibility decision.
* * * * *

    Dated: November 21, 2016.
Leslie Kux,
Associate Commissioner for Policy, Food and Drug Administration.

    In concurrence with FDA:

    Dated: November 21, 2016.
Timothy E. Skud,
Deputy Assistant Secretary (Tax, Trade, and Tariff Policy), Department
of the Treasury.
[FR Doc. 2016-28582 Filed 11-28-16; 8:45 am]
 BILLING CODE 4164-01-P


[Federal Register Volume 81, Number 248 (Tuesday, December 27, 2016)]
[Notices]
[Pages 95135-95136]
[FR Doc No: 2016-31034]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY

[FRL-9957-36-ORD]

Hydraulic Fracturing for Oil and Gas: Impacts From the Hydraulic
Fracturing Water Cycle on Drinking Water Resources in the United States

AGENCY: Environmental Protection Agency (EPA).

ACTION: Notice of availability.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: EPA is announcing the availability of a final report titled,
``Hydraulic Fracturing for Oil and Gas: Impacts from the Hydraulic
Fracturing Water Cycle on Drinking Water Resources in the United
States'' (EPA/600/R/16/236F), which was prepared by EPA's Office of
Research and Development (ORD). This final report provides a review and
synthesis of available scientific information concerning the
relationship between hydraulic fracturing activities and drinking water
resources in the United States.

DATES: This document was available on December 13, 2016.

ADDRESSES: The final report, ``Hydraulic Fracturing for Oil and Gas:
Impacts from the Hydraulic Fracturing Water Cycle on Drinking Water
Resources in the United States'' is available primarily via the
internet on EPA-ORD's hydraulic fracturing Web site at www.epa.gov/hfstudy. A limited number of paper copies are available from the
Information Management Team, NCEA; phone:<PHONE_NUMBER>; fax: 703-347-
8691. If you are requesting a paper copy, please provide your name,
mailing address, and the document title.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:  Dayna Gibbons, Office of Research and
Development; phone:<PHONE_NUMBER>; or email<EMAIL_ADDRESS>For
technical information, contact Dr. Jeffrey Frithsen, Office of Research
and Development; phone:<PHONE_NUMBER>; or email<EMAIL_ADDRESS>
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

Information About the Document

    EPA found scientific evidence that hydraulic fracturing activities
can impact drinking water resources under some circumstances. The
report

identifies certain conditions under which impacts from hydraulic
fracturing activities can be more frequent or severe, to include:
     Water withdrawals for hydraulic fracturing in times or
areas of low water availability, particularly in areas with limited or
declining groundwater resources;
     Spills during the handling of hydraulic fracturing fluids
and chemicals or produced water that resulted in large volumes or high
concentrations of chemicals reaching groundwater resources;
     Injection of hydraulic fracturing fluids into wells with
inadequate mechanical integrity, allowing gases or liquids to move to
groundwater resources;
     Injection of hydraulic fracturing fluids directly into
groundwater resources;
     Discharge of inadequately treated hydraulic fracturing
wastewater to surface water; and
     Disposal or storage of hydraulic fracturing wastewater in
unlined pits resulting in contamination of groundwater resources.
    Data gaps and uncertainties limited EPA's ability to fully assess
the potential impacts on drinking water resources locally and
nationally. Because of these data gaps and uncertainties, it was not
possible to fully characterize the severity of impacts, nor was it
possible to calculate or estimate the national frequency of impacts on
drinking water resources from activities in the hydraulic fracturing
water cycle.
    EPA's report advances the scientific understanding of hydraulic
fracturing's impact on drinking water resources and can inform
decisions by federal, state, tribal, local officials, industry, and
communities to protect drinking water resources now and in the future.

    Dated: December 15, 2016.
Mary A. Ross,
Deputy Director, National Center for Environmental Assessment.
[FR Doc. 2016-31034 Filed 12-23-16; 8:45 am]
 BILLING CODE 6560-50-P


[Federal Register: July 13, 2007 (Volume 72, Number 134)]
[Notices]
[Page 38637-38639]
[DOCID:fr13jy07-124]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

[Release No. 34-56031; File No. SR-ISE-2007-53]

Self-Regulatory Organizations; International Securities Exchange,
LLC; Notice of Filing and Immediate Effectiveness of Proposed Rule
Change to Extend the Quarterly Options Series Pilot Program

July 9, 2007.
    Pursuant to Section 19(b)(1) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934
(``Act'') \1\ and Rule 19b-4 thereunder,\2\ notice is hereby given that
on June 27, 2007, the International Securities Exchange, LLC
(``Exchange'' or ``ISE'') filed with the Securities and Exchange
Commission (``Commission'') the proposed rule change as described in
Items I and II below, which Items have been substantially prepared by
the Exchange. The Exchange has designated this proposal as non-
controversial under Section 19(b)(3)(A)(iii) of the Act \3\ and Rule
19b-4(f)(6) thereunder,\4\ which renders the proposed rule change
effective upon filing with the Commission. The Commission is publishing
this notice to solicit comments on the proposed rule change from
interested persons.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \1\ 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(1).
    \2\ 17 CFR 240.19b-4.
    \3\ 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(3)(A)(iii).
    \4\ 17 CFR 240.19b-4(f)(6).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

I. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement of the Terms of Substance
of the Proposed Rule Change

    The Exchange is proposing to extend, until July 10, 2008, its
quarterly options pilot program (``Pilot Program''). The text of the
proposed rule change is available on the Exchange's Web site (http://www.ise.com
), at the Exchange's principal office, and at the

Commission's Public Reference Room.

II. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement of the Purpose of, and
Statutory Basis for, the Proposed Rule Change

    In its filing with the Commission, the Exchange included statements
concerning the purpose of, and basis for, the proposed rule change and
discussed any comments it received on the proposed rule change. The
text of these statements may be examined at the places specified in
Item IV below. The Exchange has prepared summaries, set forth in
sections A, B, and C below, of the most significant aspects of such
statements.

A. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement of the Purpose of, and
Statutory Basis for, the Proposed Rule Change

1. Purpose
    The Exchange is proposing to extend, until July 10, 2008, an ISE
pilot program (``Pilot Program'') to list options series that would
expire at the close of business on the last business day of a calendar
quarter (``Quarterly Options Series'').\5\ The Pilot Program is
currently set to expire on July 10, 2007. Under the Pilot Program, the
Exchange is allowed to open Quarterly Options Series on up to five (5)
currently listed options classes that are either index options or
options on ETFs. The Exchange also is allowed to list Quarterly Options
Series on any options class that is selected by other securities
exchanges that employ a similar pilot program under their respective
rules. The Exchange has selected the following five options classes to
participate in the Pilot Program: the Standard & Poor's Depositary
Receipts[reg] (SPY); Nasdaq-100[reg] Shares (QQQQ); Diamonds[reg] Trust
Series 1 (DIA); iShares Russell 2000[reg]

Index Fund (IWM); and Select Sector SPDR[reg]--Energy (XLE). The ISE
believes the Pilot Program has been successful and well received by its
members and the investing public. Thus, the ISE proposes to extend the
Pilot Program until July 10, 2008.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \5\ See Exchange Act Release No. 54113 (July 7, 2006), 71 FR
39694 (July 13, 2006) (File No. SR-ISE-2006-24) (``Approval
Order'').
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    In support of this proposed rule change, and as required by the
Approval Order, the Exchange is submitting to the Commission a report
(``Pilot Program Report''), attached as Exhibit 3 to the Form 19b-4
filed with the Commission, detailing the Exchange's experience with the
Pilot Program. Specifically, the Pilot Program Report contains data and
written analysis regarding the five options classes included in the
Quarterly Options Pilot Program for the period from July 10, 2006
through December 29, 2006. The Exchange believes there is sufficient
investor interest and demand to extend the Pilot Program for another
year. The Exchange further believes that the Pilot Program has provided
investors with a flexible and valuable tool to manage risk exposure,
minimize capital outlays, and the ability to more closely tailor their
investment strategies and decisions to the movement of the underlying
security. Finally, the Exchange has not detected any material
proliferation of illiquid options series resulting from the
introduction of the Pilot Program.
    Additionally, the Exchange proposes to amend ISE Rule 2009,
Supplementary Material .02 to: (1) Limit the number of strike prices
that the Exchange may initially open for Quarterly Options Series to
five strike prices above or below the value of the underlying index;
(2) clarify that the Exchange may open for trading additional Quarterly
Options Series of the same class when the Exchange deems such action
necessary to maintain an orderly market or meet customer demand,
provided that the additional series priced above (below) the value of
the underlying index do not cause there to be more than five strike
prices above (below) the value of the underlying index; and (3) clarify
that the opening of any new Quarterly Options Series will not affect
the previously opened series of options of the same class.\6\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \6\ The Commission recently approved a similar change to the
rules of the Chicago Board Options Exchange and the Philadelphia
Stock Exchange. See Securities Exchange Act Releases No. 54762
(November 16, 2006), 71 FR 67663 (November 22, 2006) (Notice of
Filing and Order Granting Accelerated Approval of File No. SR-CBOE-
2006-93) and 55301 (February 15, 2007), 72 FR 8238 (February 23,
2007) (Notice of Filing and Immediate Effectiveness of File No. SR-
Phlx-2007-08).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    Finally, the Exchange represents that it has the necessary systems
capacity to support new options series that result from the continued
listing and trading of Quarterly Options Series.
2. Statutory Basis
    The Exchange believes that the proposed rule change is consistent
with Section 6(b) of the Act \7\ in general, and furthers the
objectives of Section 6(b)(5) of the Act \8\ in particular, in that it
is designed to promote just and equitable principles of trade, to
prevent fraudulent and manipulative acts, to remove impediments to and
perfect the mechanism for a free and open market and a national market
system, and, in general, to protect investors and the public interest.
The Exchange believes that extension of the Pilot Program will result
in a continuing benefit to investors, by allowing them to more closely
tailor their investment decisions, and will allow the Exchange to
further study investor interest in quarterly options.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \7\ 15 U.S.C. 78f(b).
    \8\ 15 U.S.C. 78f(b)(5).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

B. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement on Burden on Competition

    The Exchange believes that the proposed rule change does not impose
any burden on competition that is not necessary or appropriate in
furtherance of the purposes of the Act.

C. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement on Comments on the Proposed
Rule Change Received from Members, Participants or Others

    The Exchange has not solicited, and does not intend to solicit,
comments on this proposed rule change. The Exchange has not received
any unsolicited written comments from members or other interested
parties.

III. Date of Effectiveness of the Proposed Rule Change and Timing for
Commission Action

    The Exchange has designated the proposed rule change as one that:
(1) Does not significantly affect the protection of investors or the
public interest; (2) does not impose any significant burden on
competition; and (3) does not become operative for 30 days from the
date of filing, or such shorter time as the Commission may designate if
consistent with the protection of investors and the public interest.
Therefore, the foregoing rule change has become effective pursuant to
Section 19(b)(3)(A) of the Act \9\ and subparagraph (f)(6) of Rule 19b-
4 thereunder.\10\ The Exchange has asked the Commission to waive the
operative delay to permit the Pilot Program extension to become
effective prior to the 30th day after filing.\11\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \9\ 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(3)(A).
    \10\ 17 CFR 240.19b-4(f)(6).
    \11\ As required under Rule 19b-4(f)(6)(iii), the Exchange
provided the Commission with written notice of its intent to file
the proposed rule change at least five business days before doing
so.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    The Commission believes that waiving the 30-day operative delay is
consistent with the protection of investors and the public interest
because it will allow the benefits of the Pilot Program to continue
without interruption.\12\ Therefore, the Commission designates the
proposal operative upon filing.\13\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \12\ For purposes only of waiving the 30-day operative delay,
the Commission has considered the proposed rule's impact on
efficiency, competition, and capital formation. See 15 U.S.C.
78c(f).
    \13\ As set forth in the Approval Order, if the Exchange were to
propose an extension, an expansion, or permanent approval of the
Pilot Program, the Exchange would submit, along with any filing
proposing such amendments to the program, a report that would
provide an analysis of the Pilot Program covering the entire period
during which the Pilot Program was in effect. The report would
include, at a minimum: (1) Data and written analysis on the open
interest and trading volume in the classes for which Quarterly
Option Series were opened; (2) an assessment of the appropriateness
of the option classes selected for the Pilot Program; (3) an
assessment of the impact of the Pilot Program on the capacity of the
Exchange, OPRA, and market data vendors (to the extent data from
market data vendors is available); (4) any capacity problems or
other problems that arose during the operation of the Pilot Program
and how the Exchange addressed such problems; (5) any complaints
that the Exchange received during the operation of the Pilot Program
and how the Exchange addressed them; and (6) any additional
information that would assist in assessing the operation of the
Pilot Program. The report must be submitted to the Commission at
least sixty (60) days prior to the expiration date of the Pilot
Program. See Approval Order, supra note 5.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    At any time within 60 days of the filing of the proposed rule
change, the Commission may summarily abrogate the rule change if it
appears to the Commission that such action is necessary or appropriate
in the public interest, for the protection of investors, or otherwise
in furtherance of the purposes of the Act.

IV. Solicitation of Comments

    Interested persons are invited to submit written data, views, and
arguments concerning the foregoing, including whether the proposed rule
change is consistent with the Act. Comments may be submitted by any of
the following methods:

Electronic Comments

     Use the Commission's Internet comment form (http://www.sec.gov/rules/sro.shtml.
); or     Send an e-mail to<EMAIL_ADDRESS>Please include

File No. SR-ISE-2007-53 on the subject line.

Paper Comments

     Send paper comments in triplicate to Nancy M. Morris,
Secretary, Securities and Exchange Commission, 100 F Street, NE.,
Washington, DC 20549-1090.

All submissions should refer to File Number SR-ISE-2007-53. This file
number should be included on the subject line if e-mail is used. To
help the Commission process and review your comments more efficiently,
please use only one method. The Commission will post all comments on
the Commissions Internet Web site (http://www.sec.gov/rules/sro.shtml).

Copies of the submission, all subsequent amendments, all written
statements with respect to the proposed rule change that are filed with
the Commission, and all written communications relating to the proposed
rule change between the Commission and any person, other than those
that may be withheld from the public in accordance with the provisions
of 5 U.S.C. 552, will be available for inspection and copying in the
Commission's Public Reference Room, 100 F Street, NE., Washington, DC
20549, on official business days between the hours of 10 a.m. and 3
p.m. Copies of such filing also will be available for inspection and
copying at the principal office of the Exchange. All comments received
will be posted without change; the Commission does not edit personal
identifying information from submissions. You should submit only
information that you wish to make available publicly. All submissions
should refer to File Number SR-ISE-2007-53 and should be submitted on
or before August 3, 2007.

    For the Commission, by the Division of Market Regulation,
pursuant to delegated authority.\14\
Florence E. Harmon,
Deputy Secretary.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \14\ 17 CFR 200.30-3(a)(12).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

[FR Doc. E7-13601 Filed 7-12-07; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 8010-01-P


[Federal Register Volume 80, Number 48 (Thursday, March 12, 2015)]
[Notices]
[Pages 13053-13054]
[FR Doc No: 2015-05600]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

Proposed Collection; Comment Request

Upon Written Request, Copies Available From: Securities and Exchange
Commission, Office of FOIA Services, 100 F Street NE., Washington, DC
20549-2736.

Extension:
    Rule 15g-5, SEC File No. 270-348, OMB Control No. 3235-0394.

    Notice is hereby given that pursuant to the Paperwork Reduction Act
of 1995 (``PRA'') (44 U.S.C. 3501 et seq.), the Securities and Exchange
Commission (``Commission'') is soliciting comments on the existing
collection of information provided for in Rule 15g-5--Disclosure of
Compensation to Associated Persons in Connection with Penny Stock
Transactions--(17 CFR 240.15g-5) under the Securities Exchange Act of
1934 (15 U.S.C. 78a et seq.). The Commission plans to submit this
existing collection of information to the Office of Management and
Budget (``OMB'') for extension and approval.
    Rule 15g-5 requires brokers and dealers to disclose to customers
the amount of compensation to be received by their sales agents in
connection with penny stock transactions. The purpose of the rule is to
increase the level of disclosure to investors concerning penny stocks
generally and specific penny stock transactions.
    The Commission estimates that approximately 221 broker-dealers will
spend an average of 87 hours annually to comply with the rule. Thus,
the total compliance burden is approximately 19,245 burden-hours per
year.
    Written comments are invited on: (a) Whether the proposed
collection of information is necessary for the proper performance of
the functions of the agency, including whether the information will
have practical utility; (b) the accuracy of the agency's estimate of
the burden of the collection of information; (c) ways to enhance the
quality, utility, and clarity of the information collected; and (d)
ways to minimize the burden of the collection of

information on respondents, including through the use of automated
collection techniques or other forms of information technology.
Consideration will be given to comments and suggestions submitted in
writing within 60 days of this publication.
    An agency may not conduct or sponsor, and a person is not required
to respond to, a collection of information under the PRA unless it
displays a currently valid OMB control number.
    Please direct your written comments to: Pamela Dyson, Director/
Chief Information Officer, Securities and Exchange Commission, c/o Remi
Pavlik-Simon, 100 F Street NE., Washington, DC 20549 or send an email
to<EMAIL_ADDRESS>
    Dated: March 6, 2015.
Jill M. Peterson,
Assistant Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2015-05600 Filed 3-11-15; 8:45 am]
 BILLING CODE 8011-01-P


[Federal Register Volume 80, Number 36 (Tuesday, February 24, 2015)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Pages 9622-9628]
[FR Doc No: 2015-03803]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY

40 CFR Parts 61 and 63

[EPA-R06-OAR-2008-0063; FRL-9923-22-Region 6]

National Emission Standards for Hazardous Air Pollutants;
Delegation of Authority to Oklahoma

AGENCY: Environmental Protection Agency (EPA).

ACTION: Direct final rule; delegation of authority.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Oklahoma Department of Environmental Quality (ODEQ) has
submitted updated regulations for receiving delegation of Environmental
Protection Agency (EPA) authority for implementation and enforcement of
National Emission Standards for Hazardous Air Pollutants (NESHAPs) for
all sources (both part 70 and non-part 70 sources). The delegation of
authority under this action does not apply to sources located in Indian
Country. EPA is taking direct final action to approve the delegation of
certain NESHAPs to ODEQ.

DATES: This rule is effective on April 27, 2015 without further notice,
unless EPA receives relevant adverse comment by March 26, 2015. If EPA
receives such comment, EPA will publish a timely withdrawal in the
Federal Register informing the public that the updated NESHAPs
delegation will not take effect.

ADDRESSES: Submit your comments, identified by Docket ID No. EPA-R06-
OAR-2008-0063, by one of the following methods:
     www.regulations.gov. Follow the on-line instructions.
     Email: Mr. Rick Barrett at<EMAIL_ADDRESS>Please
also send a copy by email to the person listed in the FOR FURTHER
INFORMATION CONTACT section below.
     Mail or delivery: Mr. Rick Barrett, Air Permits Section
(6PD-R), Environmental Protection Agency, 1445 Ross Avenue, Suite 1200,
Dallas, Texas 75202-2733.
    Instructions: Direct your comments to Docket No. EPA-R06-OAR-2008-
0063. EPA's policy is that all comments received will be included in
the public docket without change and may be made available online at
http://www.regulations.gov, including any personal information
provided, unless the comment includes information claimed to be
Confidential Business Information (CBI) or other information whose
disclosure is restricted by statute. Do not submit information through
http://www.regulations.gov or email, if you believe that it is CBI or
otherwise protected from disclosure. The http://www.regulations.gov Web
site is an ``anonymous access'' system, which means EPA will not know
your identity or contact information unless you provide it in the body
of your comment. If you send an email comment directly to EPA without
going through http://www.regulations.gov, your email address will be
automatically captured and included as part of the comment that is
placed in the public docket and made available on the Internet. If you
submit an electronic comment, EPA recommends that you include your name
and other contact information in the body of your comment along with
any disk or CD-ROM submitted. If EPA cannot read your comment due to
technical difficulties and cannot contact you for clarification, EPA
may not be able to consider your comment. Electronic files should avoid
the use of special characters and any form of encryption and be free of
any defects or viruses. For additional information about EPA's public
docket, visit the EPA Docket Center homepage at http://www.epa.gov/epahome/dockets.htm.
    Docket: The index to the docket for this action is available
electronically at www.regulations.gov and in hard copy

at EPA Region 6, 1445 Ross Avenue, Suite 700, Dallas, Texas. While all
documents in the docket are listed in the index, some information may
be publicly available only at the hard copy location (e.g., copyrighted
material), and some may not be publicly available at either location
(e.g., CBI).

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Mr. Rick Barrett (6PD-R), (214) 665-
7227<EMAIL_ADDRESS>To inspect the hard copy materials,
please schedule an appointment with Mr. Barrett or Mr. Bill Deese at
(214) 665-7253.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Throughout this document ``we,'' ``us,'' and
``our'' refers to EPA.

Table of Contents

I. What does this action do?
II. What is the authority for delegation?
III. What criteria must Oklahoma's programs meet to be approved?
IV. How did ODEQ meet the approval criteria?
V. What is being delegated?
VI. What is not being delegated?
VII. How will applicability determinations be made?
VIII. What authority does EPA have?
IX. What information must ODEQ provide to EPA?
X. What is EPA's oversight role?
XI. Should sources submit notices to EPA or ODEQ?
XII. How will unchanged authorities be delegated to ODEQ in the
future?
XIII. Final Action
XIV. Statutory and Executive Order Reviews

 I. What does this action do?

    EPA is taking direct final action to approve the delegation of
certain NESHAPs to ODEQ. With this delegation, ODEQ has the primary
responsibility to implement and enforce the delegated standards.

II. What is the authority for delegation?

    Section 112(l) of the CAA, and 40 CFR part 63, subpart E, authorize
EPA to delegate authority to any State or local agency which submits
adequate regulatory procedures for implementation and enforcement of
emission standards for hazardous air pollutants. The hazardous air
pollutant standards are codified at 40 CFR parts 61 and 63.

III. What criteria must Oklahoma's program meet to be approved?

    Section 112(l)(5) of the CAA enables EPA to approve state air
toxics programs or rules to operate in place of the Federal air toxics
program or rules. 40 CFR part 63, subpart E governs EPA's approval of
State rules or programs under section 112(l).
    EPA will approve an air toxics program if we find that:
    (1) The State program is ``no less stringent'' than the
corresponding Federal program or rule;
    (2) The State has adequate authority and resources to implement the
program;
    (3) The schedule for implementation and compliance is sufficiently
expeditious; and
    (4) The program otherwise complies with Federal guidance.
    In order to obtain approval of its program to implement and enforce
Federal section 112 rules as promulgated without changes (straight
delegation), a state must demonstrate that it meets the approval
criteria of 40 CFR 63.91(d). 40 CFR 63.91(d)(3) provides that interim
or final Title V program approval will satisfy the criteria of 40 CFR
63.91(d) for part 70 sources (sources required to obtain operating
permits pursuant to Title V of the Clean Air Act).

IV. How did ODEQ meet the NESHAPs program approval criteria?

    As to the NESHAPs standards in 40 CFR parts 61 and 63, as part of
its Title V submission ODEQ stated that it intended to use the
mechanism of incorporation by reference to adopt unchanged Federal
section 112 into its regulations. This commitment applied to both
existing and future standards as they applied to part 70 sources. EPA's
final interim approval of Oklahoma's Title V operating permits program
delegated the authority to implement certain NESHAPs on February 5,
1996 (61 FR 4220). On December 5, 2001, EPA granted final full approval
of the State's operating permits program (66 FR 63170). These interim
and final Title V program approvals satisfy the upfront approval
criteria of 40 CFR 63.91(d). Under 40 CFR 63.91(d)(2), once a State has
satisfied up-front approval criteria, it needs only to reference the
previous demonstration and reaffirm that it still meets the criteria
for any subsequent submittals of the section 112 standards. ODEQ has
affirmed that it still meets the up-front approval criteria.

V. What is being delegated?

    By letter dated January 11, 2008, ODEQ requested EPA to update its
existing NESHAP delegation. With certain exceptions noted in section VI
below, Oklahoma's request included NESHAPs in 40 CFR part 61 and 40 CFR
part 63. ODEQ's request included newly incorporated NESHAPs promulgated
by EPA and amendments to existing standards currently delegated, as
amended between September 2, 2004 and September 1, 2006. These NESHAPs
were adopted by the ODEQ on March 27, 2007, and became effective on
June 15, 2007.

VI. What is not being delegated?

    The following part 61 and 63 authorities listed below are not
delegated. All of the inquiries and requests concerning implementation
and enforcement of the excluded standards in the State of Oklahoma
should be directed to the EPA Region 6 Office.
     40 CFR part 61, subpart B (National Emission Standards for
Radon Emissions from Underground Uranium Mines);
     40 CFR part 61, subpart H (National Emission Standards for
Emissions of Radionuclides Other Than Radon From Department of Energy
Facilities);
     40 CFR part 61, subpart I (National Emission Standards for
Radionuclide Emissions from Federal Facilities Other Than Nuclear
Regulatory Commission Licensees and Not Covered by Subpart H);
     40 CFR part 61, subpart K (National Emission Standards for
Radionuclide Emissions from Elemental Phosphorus Plants);
     40 CFR part 61, subpart Q (National Emission Standards for
Radon Emissions from Department of Energy facilities);
     40 CFR part 61, subpart R (National Emission Standards for
Radon Emissions from Phosphogypsum Stacks);
     40 CFR part 61, subpart T (National Emission Standards for
Radon Emissions from the Disposal of Uranium Mill Tailings); and
     40 CFR part 61, subpart W (National Emission Standards for
Radon Emissions from Operating Mill Tailings).
    In addition, EPA cannot delegate to a State any of the Category II
Subpart A authorities set forth in 40 CFR 63.91(g) (2). These include
the following provisions: Sec.  63.6(g), Approval of Alternative Non-
Opacity Standards; Sec.  63.6(h)(9), Approval of Alternative Opacity
Standards; Sec.  63.7(e)(2)(ii) and (f), Approval of Major Alternatives
to Test Methods; Sec.  63.8(f), Approval of Major Alternatives to
Monitoring; and Sec.  63.10(f), Approval of Major Alternatives to
Recordkeeping and Reporting. In addition, some Part 63 standards have
certain provisions that cannot be delegated to the States. Therefore,
any Part 63 standard that provides that certain authorities cannot be
delegated are retained by EPA and not delegated to ODEQ. Furthermore,
no authorities are delegated that require rulemaking in the Federal
Register to implement, or where Federal overview

is the only way to ensure national consistency in the application of
the standards or requirements of CAA section 112. Finally, section
112(r), the accidental release program authority, is not being
delegated by this approval.
    In addition, this delegation to ODEQ to implement and enforce
certain NESHAPs does not extend to sources or activities located in
Indian country, as defined in 18 U.S.C. 1151. Under this definition,
EPA treats as reservations, trust lands validly set aside for the use
of a Tribe even if the trust lands have not been formally designated as
a reservation. Consistent with previous federal program approvals or
delegations, EPA will continue to implement the NESHAPs in Indian
country because ODEQ has not submitted information to demonstrate
authority over sources and activities located within the exterior
boundaries of Indian reservations and other areas in Indian country.\1\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \1\ The Safe, Accountable, Flexible, Efficient Transportation
Equity Act of 2005 includes a provision relating to Oklahoma and EPA
programs, providing:
    Notwithstanding any other provision of law, if the Administrator
of the Environmental Protection Agency (referred to in this section
as the ``Administrator'') determines that a regulatory program
submitted by the State of Oklahoma for approval by the Administrator
under a law administered by the Administrator meets applicable
requirements of the law, and the Administrator approves the State to
administer the State program under the law with respect to areas in
the State that are not Indian country, on request of the State, the
Administrator shall approve the State to administer the State
program in the areas of the State that are in Indian country,
without any further demonstration of authority by the State.
    H.R. 3, Section 10211(a). Oklahoma has not applied to administer
the NESHAPS program in Indian country in accordance with this
statute.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

VII. How will applicability determinations under section 112 be made?

    In approving this delegation, ODEQ will obtain concurrence from EPA
on any matter involving the interpretation of section 112 of the CAA or
40 CFR parts 61 and 63 to the extent that implementation,
administration, or enforcement of these sections have not been covered
by EPA determinations or guidance.

VIII. What authority does EPA have?

    We retain the right, as provided by CAA section 112(l)(7), to
enforce any applicable emission standard or requirement under section
112. EPA also has the authority to make certain decisions under the
General Provisions (subpart A) of part 63. We are granting ODEQ some of
these authorities, and retaining others, as explained in sections V and
VI above. In addition, EPA may review and disapprove of State
determinations and subsequently require corrections. (See 40 CFR
63.91(g) and 65 FR 55810, 55823, September 14, 2000, as amended at 70
FR 59887, October 13, 2005; 72 FR 27443, May 16, 2007.)
    Furthermore, we retain any authority in an individual emission
standard that may not be delegated according to provisions of the
standard. Also, listed in the footnotes of the part 63 delegation table
at the end of this rule are the authorities that cannot be delegated to
any State or local agency which we therefore retain.

IX. What information must ODEQ provide to EPA?

    ODEQ must provide any additional compliance related information to
EPA, Region 6, Office of Enforcement and Compliance Assurance within 45
days of a request under 40 CFR 63.96(a). In receiving delegation for
specific General Provisions authorities, ODEQ must submit to EPA Region
6 on a semi-annual basis, copies of determinations issued under these
authorities. For parts 61 and 63 standards, these determinations
include: Section 63.1, Applicability Determinations; Section 63.6(e),
Operation and Maintenance Requirements--Responsibility for Determining
Compliance; Section 63.6(f), Compliance with Non-Opacity Standards--
Responsibility for Determining Compliance; Section 63.6(h), Compliance
with Opacity and Visible Emissions Standards--Responsibility for
Determining Compliance; Sections 63.7(c)(2)(i) and (d), Approval of
Site-Specific Test Plans; Section 63.7(e)(2)(i), Approval of Minor
Alternatives to Test Methods; Section 63.7(e)(2)(ii) and (f), Approval
of Intermediate Alternatives to Test Methods; Section 63.7(e)(iii),
Approval of Shorter Sampling Times and Volumes When Necessitated by
Process Variables or Other Factors; Sections 63.7(e)(2)(iv), (h)(2),
and (h)(3), Waiver of Performance Testing; Sections 63.8(c)(1) and
(e)(1), Approval of Site-Specific Performance Evaluation (Monitoring)
Test Plans; Section 63.8(f), Approval of Minor Alternatives to
Monitoring; Section 63.8(f), Approval of Intermediate Alternatives to
Monitoring; Section 63.9 and 63.10, Approval of Adjustments to Time
Periods for Submitting Reports; Section 63.10(f), Approval of Minor
Alternatives to Recordkeeping and Reporting; Section 63.7(a)(4),
Extension of Performance Test Deadline.

X. What is EPA's oversight role?

    EPA must oversee ODEQ's decisions to ensure the delegated
authorities are being adequately implemented and enforced. We will
integrate oversight of the delegated authorities into the existing
mechanisms and resources for oversight currently in place. If, during
oversight, we determine that ODEQ made decisions that decreased the
stringency of the delegated standards, then ODEQ shall be required to
take corrective actions and the source(s) affected by the decisions
will be notified, as required by 40 CFR 63.91(g)(1)(ii). We will
initiate withdrawal of the program or rule if the corrective actions
taken are insufficient.

XI. Should sources submit notices to EPA or ODEQ?

    All of the information required pursuant to the general provisions
and the relevant subpart of the Federal NESHAPs (40 CFR parts 61 and
63) should be submitted by sources located outside of Indian country,
directly to the ODEQ at the following address: Oklahoma Department of
Environmental Quality, 707 North Robinson, P.O. Box 1677, Oklahoma
City, Oklahoma 73101-1677. The ODEQ is the primary point of contact
with respect to delegated NESHAPs. Sources do not need to send a copy
to EPA. EPA Region 6 waives the requirement that notifications and
reports for delegated standards be submitted to EPA in addition to ODEQ
in accordance with 40 CFR 63.9(a)(4)(ii) and 63.10(a)(4)(ii). For those
standards that are not delegated, sources must continue to submit all
appropriate information to EPA.

XII. How will unchanged authorities be delegated to ODEQ in the future?

    In the future, ODEQ will only need to send a letter of request for
approval to EPA, Region 6, for NESHAP regulations that ODEQ has adopted
by reference. The letter must reference the previous up-front approval
demonstration and reaffirm that it still meets the up-front approval
criteria. We will respond in writing to the request stating that the
request for delegation is either granted or denied. A Federal Register
action will be published to inform the public and affected sources of
the delegation, indicate where source notifications and reports should
be sent, and to amend the relevant portions of the Code of Federal
Regulations showing which NESHAPs standards have been delegated to
ODEQ.

XIII. Final Action

    The public was provided the opportunity to comment on the proposed
approval of the program and mechanism for delegation of section 112
standards, as they apply to part 70

sources, on March 10, 1995, for the proposed interim approval of ODEQ's
operating permits program. (60 FR 13088). In EPA's final full approval
of ODEQ's operating permits program on February 5, 1996 (61 FR 4220),
EPA discussed that no adverse comments were received from the public on
the proposed final delegation of the operating permits program. In
today's action, the public is given the opportunity to comment on the
approval of ODEQ's request for delegation of authority to implement and
enforce certain section 112 standards for all sources (both part 70 and
non-part 70 sources) which have been adopted by reference into
Oklahoma's state regulations. However, the Agency views the approval of
this request as a noncontroversial action and anticipates no adverse
comments. Therefore, EPA is publishing this rule without prior
proposal. However, in the ``Proposed Rules'' section of today's Federal
Register publication, EPA is publishing a separate document that will
serve as the proposal to approve the program and delegation of
authority described in this action if adverse comments are received.
This action will be effective April 27, 2015 without further notice
unless the Agency receives relevant adverse comments by March 26, 2015.
    If EPA receives relevant adverse comments, we will publish a timely
withdrawal in the Federal Register informing the public the rule will
not take effect. We will address all public comments in a subsequent
final rule based on the proposed rule. The EPA will not institute a
second comment period on this action. Any parties interested in
commenting must do so at this time. Please note that if we receive
relevant adverse comment on an amendment, paragraph, or section of the
rule and if that provision may be severed from the remainder of the
rule, we may adopt as final those provisions of the rule that are not
the subject of a relevant adverse comment.

XIV. Statutory and Executive Order Reviews

    Under Executive Order 12866 (58 FR 51735, October 4, 1993), this
action is not a ``significant regulatory action'' and therefore is not
subject to review by the Office of Management and Budget. For this
reason, this action is also not subject to Executive Order 13211,
``Actions Concerning Regulations That Significantly Affect Energy
Supply, Distribution, or Use'' (66 FR 28355, May 22, 2001). This action
merely approves state law as meeting Federal requirements and imposes
no additional requirements beyond those imposed by state law.
Accordingly, the Administrator certifies that this rule will not have a
significant economic impact on a substantial number of small entities
under the Regulatory Flexibility Act (5 U.S.C. 601 et seq.). Because
this rule approves pre-existing requirements under state law and does
not impose any additional enforceable duty beyond that required by
state law, it does not contain any unfunded mandate or significantly or
uniquely affect small governments, as described in the Unfunded
Mandates Reform Act of 1995 (Pub. L. 104-4).
    In addition, this rule does not have tribal implications as
specified by Executive Order 13175 (65 FR 67249, November 9, 2000),
because the delegation is not approved to apply in Indian country
located in the State, and the EPA notes that it will not impose
substantial direct costs on tribal governments or preempt tribal law.
This action also does not have Federalism implications because it does
not have substantial direct effects on the States, on the relationship
between the national government and the States, or on the distribution
of power and responsibilities among the various levels of government,
as specified in Executive Order 13132 (64 FR 43255, August 10, 1999).
This action merely approves a state request to receive delegation of
certain Federal standards, and does not alter the relationship or the
distribution of power and responsibilities established in the Clean Air
Act. This rule also is not subject to Executive Order 13045
``Protection of Children from Environmental Health Risks and Safety
Risks'' (62 FR 19885, April 23, 1997), because it is not economically
significant.
    In reviewing delegation submissions, EPA's role is to approve
submissions provided that they meet the criteria of the Clean Air Act.
In this context, in the absence of a prior existing requirement for the
State to use voluntary consensus standards (VCS), EPA has no authority
to disapprove a delegation submission for failure to use VCS. It would
thus be inconsistent with applicable law for EPA to use VCS in place of
a delegation submission that otherwise satisfies the provisions of the
Clean Air Act. Thus, the requirements of section 12(d) of the National
Technology Transfer and Advancement Act of 1995 (15 U.S.C. 272 note) do
not apply. This rule does not impose an information collection burden
under the provisions of the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 (44 U.S.C.
3501 et seq.).
    The Congressional Review Act, 5 U.S.C. 801 et seq., as added by the
Small Business Regulatory Enforcement Fairness Act of 1996, generally
provides that before a rule may take effect, the agency promulgating
the rule must submit a rule report, which includes a copy of the rule,
to each House of the Congress and to the Comptroller General of the
United States. EPA will submit a report containing this rule and other
required information to the U.S. Senate, the U.S. House of
Representatives, and the Comptroller General of the United States prior
to publication of the rule in the Federal Register. A major rule cannot
take effect until 60 days after it is published in the Federal
Register. This action is not a ``major rule'' as defined by 5 U.S.C.
804(2).
    Under section 307(b)(1) of the Clean Air Act, petitions for
judicial review of this action must be filed in the United States Court
of Appeals for the appropriate circuit by April 27, 2015. Filing a
petition for reconsideration by the Administrator of this final rule
does not affect the finality of this rule for the purposes of judicial
review nor does it extend the time within which a petition for judicial
review may be filed, and shall not postpone the effectiveness of such
rule or action. This action may not be challenged later in proceedings
to enforce its requirements. (See section 307(b)(2).)

List of Subjects

40 CFR Part 61

    Environmental protection, Administrative practice and procedure,
Air pollution control, Arsenic, Benzene, Beryllium, Hazardous
substances, Mercury, Intergovernmental relations, Reporting and
recordkeeping requirements, Vinyl chloride.

40 CFR Part 63

    Environmental protection, Administrative practice and procedure,
Air pollution control, Hazardous substances, Intergovernmental
relations, Reporting and recordkeeping requirements.

    Dated: February 6, 2015.
Wren Stenger,
Director, Multimedia Planning and Permitting Division, Region 6.

    For the reasons stated in the preamble, 40 CFR parts 61 and 63 are
amended as follows:

PART 61--NATIONAL EMISSION STANDARDS FOR HAZARDOUS AIR POLLUTANTS

0
1. The authority citation for part 61 continues to read as follows:

    Authority: 42 U.S.C. 7401 et seq.

Subpart A--General Provisions

0
2. Section 61.04 is amended by revising paragraph (c)(6)(iv) to read as
follows:

Sec.  61.04  Address.

* * * * *
    (c) * * *
    (6) * * *
    (iv) Oklahoma. The Oklahoma Department of Environmental Quality
(ODED) has been delegated the following part 61 standards promulgated
by EPA, as amended in the Federal Register through September 1, 2006.
The (X) symbol is used to indicate each subpart that has been
delegated.

   Delegation Status for National Emission Standards for Hazardous Air
               Pollutants (Part 61 Standards) for Oklahoma
                       [Excluding Indian country]
------------------------------------------------------------------------
         Subpart                  Source category            ODEQ \1\
------------------------------------------------------------------------
A........................  General Provisions..........               X
B........................  Radon Emissions From          ...............
                            Underground Uranium Mines.
C........................  Beryllium...................               X
D........................  Beryllium Rocket Motor                     X
                            Firing.
E........................  Mercury.....................               X
F........................  Vinyl Chloride..............               X
G........................  (Reserved)..................  ...............
H........................  Emissions of Radionuclides    ...............
                            Other Than Radon From
                            Department of Energy
                            Facilities.
I........................  Radionuclide Emissions From   ...............
                            Federal Facilities Other
                            Than Nuclear Regulatory
                            Commission Licensees and
                            Not Covered by Subpart H.
J........................  Equipment Leaks (Fugitive                  X
                            Emission Sources) of
                            Benzene.
K........................  Radionuclide Emissions From   ...............
                            Elemental Phosphorus Plants.
L........................  Benzene Emissions From Coke                X
                            By-Product Recovery Plants.
M........................  Asbestos....................               X
N........................  Inorganic Arsenic Emissions                X
                            From Glass Manufacturing
                            Plants.
O........................  Inorganic Arsenic Emissions                X
                            From Primary Copper
                            Smelters.
P........................  Inorganic Arsenic Emissions                X
                            From Arsenic Trioxide and
                            Metallic Arsenic Production
                            Facilities.
Q........................  Radon Emissions From          ...............
                            Department of Energy
                            Facilities.
R........................  Radon Emissions From          ...............
                            Phosphogypsum Stacks.
S........................  (Reserved)..................  ...............
T........................  Radon Emissions From the      ...............
                            Disposal of Uranium Mill
                            Tailings.
U........................  (Reserved)..................  ...............
V........................  Equipment Leaks (Fugitives                 X
                            Emission Sources).
W........................  Radon Emissions From          ...............
                            Operating Mill Tailings.
X........................  (Reserved)..................  ...............
Y........................  Benzene Emissions From                     X
                            Benzene Storage Vessels.
Z-AA.....................  (Reserved)..................  ...............
BB.......................  Benzene Emissions From                     X
                            Benzene Transfer Operations.
CC-EE....................  (Reserved)..................  ...............
FF.......................  Benzene Waste Operations....               X
------------------------------------------------------------------------
\1\ Program delegated to Oklahoma Department of Environmental Quality
  (ODEQ).

* * * * *

PART 63--NATIONAL EMISSION STANDARDS FOR HAZARDOUS AIR POLLUTANTS
FOR SOURCE CATEGORIES

0
3. The authority citation for part 63 continues to read as follows:

    Authority: 42 U.S.C. 7401 et seq.

Subpart E--Approval of State Programs and Delegation of Federal
Authorities

0
4. Section 63.99 is amended by revising paragraph (a)(37)(i) to read as
follows:

Sec.  63.99  Delegated Federal authorities.

    (a) * * *
    (37) * * *
    (i) The following table lists the specific part 63 standards that
have been delegated unchanged to the Oklahoma Department of
Environmental Quality for all sources. The ``X'' symbol is used to
indicate each subpart that has been delegated. The delegations are
subject to all of the conditions and limitations set forth in Federal
law, regulations, policy, guidance, and determinations. Some
authorities cannot be delegated and are retained by EPA. These include
certain General Provisions authorities and specific parts of some
standards. Any amendments made to these rules after September 1, 2006
are not delegated.

       Delegation Status for Part 63 Standards--State of Oklahoma
                       [Excluding Indian country]
------------------------------------------------------------------------
         Subpart                  Source category            ODEQ 1 2
------------------------------------------------------------------------
A........................  General Provisions..........               X
F........................  Hazardous Organic NESHAP                   X
                            (HON)--Synthetic Organic
                            Chemical Manufacturing
                            Industry (SOCMI).
G........................  HON--SOCMI Process Vents,                  X
                            Storage Vessels, Transfer
                            Operations and Wastewater.
H........................  HON--Equipment Leaks........               X
I........................  HON--Certain Processes                     X
                            Negotiated Equipment Leak
                            Regulation.
J........................  Polyvinyl Chloride and                 (\3\)
                            Copolymers Production.

K........................  (Reserved)..................  ...............
L........................  Coke Oven Batteries.........               X
M........................  Perchloroethylene Dry                      X
                            Cleaning.
N........................  Chromium Electroplating and                X
                            Chromium Anodizing Tanks.
O........................  Ethylene Oxide Sterilizers..               X
P........................  (Reserved)..................  ...............
Q........................  Industrial Process Cooling                 X
                            Towers.
R........................  Gasoline Distribution.......               X
S........................  Pulp and Paper Industry.....               X
T........................  Halogenated Solvent Cleaning               X
U........................  Group I Polymers and Resins.               X
V........................  (Reserved)..................  ...............
W........................  Epoxy Resins Production and                X
                            Non-Nylon Polyamides
                            Production.
X........................  Secondary Lead Smelting.....               X
Y........................  Marine Tank Vessel Loading..               X
Z........................  (Reserved)..................  ...............
AA.......................  Phosphoric Acid                            X
                            Manufacturing Plants.
BB.......................  Phosphate Fertilizers                      X
                            Production Plants.
CC.......................  Petroleum Refineries........               X
DD.......................  Off-Site Waste and Recovery                X
                            Operations.
EE.......................  Magnetic Tape Manufacturing.               X
FF.......................  (Reserved)..................  ...............
GG.......................  Aerospace Manufacturing and                X
                            Rework Facilities.
HH.......................  Oil and Natural Gas                        X
                            Production Facilities.
II.......................  Shipbuilding and Ship Repair               X
                            Facilities.
JJ.......................  Wood Furniture Manufacturing               X
                            Operations.
KK.......................  Printing and Publishing                    X
                            Industry.
LL.......................  Primary Aluminum Reduction                 X
                            Plants.
MM.......................  Chemical Recovery Combustion               X
                            Sources at Kraft, Soda,
                            Sulfide, and Stand-Alone
                            Semichemical Pulp Mills.
NN.......................  (Reserved)..................  ...............
OO.......................  Tanks--Level 1..............               X
PP.......................  Containers..................               X
QQ.......................  Surface Impoundments........               X
RR.......................  Individual Drain Systems....               X
SS.......................  Closed Vent Systems, Control               X
                            Devices, Recovery Devices
                            and Routing to a Fuel Gas
                            System or a Process.
TT.......................  Equipment Leaks--Control                   X
                            Level 1.
UU.......................  Equipment Leaks--Control                   X
                            Level 2 Standards.
VV.......................  Oil--Water Separators and                  X
                            Organic--Water Separators.
WW.......................  Storage Vessels (Tanks)--                  X
                            Control Level 2.
XX.......................  Ethylene Manufacturing                     X
                            Process Units Heat Exchange
                            Systems and Waste
                            Operations.
YY.......................  Generic Maximum Achievable                 X
                            Control Technology
                            Standards.
ZZ-BBB...................  (Reserved)..................  ...............
CCC......................  Steel Pickling--HCI Process                X
                            Facilities and Hydrochloric
                            Acid Regeneration.
DDD......................  Mineral Wool Production.....               X
EEE......................  Hazardous Waste Combustors..               X
FFF......................  (Reserved)..................  ...............
GGG......................  Pharmaceuticals Production..               X
HHH......................  Natural Gas Transmission and               X
                            Storage Facilities.
III......................  Flexible Polyurethane Foam                 X
                            Production.
JJJ......................  Group IV Polymers and Resins               X
KKK......................  (Reserved)..................  ...............
LLL......................  Portland Cement                            X
                            Manufacturing.
MMM......................  Pesticide Active Ingredient                X
                            Production.
NNN......................  Wool Fiberglass                            X
                            Manufacturing.
OOO......................  Amino/Phenolic Resins.......               X
PPP......................  Polyether Polyols Production               X
QQQ......................  Primary Copper Smelting.....               X
RRR......................  Secondary Aluminum                         X
                            Production.
SSS......................  (Reserved)..................  ...............
TTT......................  Primary Lead Smelting.......               X
UUU......................  Petroleum Refineries--                     X
                            Catalytic Cracking Units,
                            Catalytic Reforming Units
                            and Sulfur Recovery Plants.
VVV......................  Publicly Owned Treatment                   X
                            Works (POTW).
WWW......................  (Reserved)..................  ...............
XXX......................  Ferroalloys Production:                    X
                            Ferromanganese and
                            Silicomanganese.
AAAA.....................  Municipal Solid Waste                      X
                            Landfills.
CCCC.....................  Nutritional Yeast                          X
                            Manufacturing.
DDDD.....................  Plywood and Composite Wood                 X
                            Products.
EEEE.....................  Organic Liquids Distribution               X
FFFF.....................  Misc. Organic Chemical                     X
                            Production and Processes
                            (MON).
GGGG.....................  Solvent Extraction for                     X
                            Vegetable Oil Production.
HHHH.....................  Wet Formed Fiberglass Mat                  X
                            Production.

IIII.....................  Auto & Light Duty Truck                    X
                            (Surface Coating).
JJJJ.....................  Paper and other Web (Surface               X
                            Coating).
KKKK.....................  Metal Can (Surface Coating).               X
MMMM.....................  Misc. Metal Parts and                      X
                            Products (Surface Coating).
NNNN.....................  Surface Coating of Large                   X
                            Appliances.
OOOO.....................  Fabric Printing Coating and                X
                            Dyeing.
PPPP.....................  Plastic Parts (Surface                     X
                            Coating).
QQQQ.....................  Surface Coating of Wood                    X
                            Building Products.
RRRR.....................  Surface Coating of Metal                   X
                            Furniture.
SSSS.....................  Surface Coating for Metal                  X
                            Coil.
TTTT.....................  Leather Finishing Operations               X
UUUU.....................  Cellulose Production                       X
                            Manufacture.
VVVV.....................  Boat Manufacturing..........               X
WWWW.....................  Reinforced Plastic                         X
                            Composites Production.
XXXX.....................  Tire Manufacturing..........               X
YYYY.....................  Combustion Turbines.........               X
ZZZZ.....................  Reciprocating Internal                     X
                            Combustion Engines (RICE).
AAAAA....................  Lime Manufacturing Plants...               X
BBBBB....................  Semiconductor Manufacturing.               X
CCCCC....................  Coke Ovens: Pushing,                       X
                            Quenching and Battery
                            Stacks.
DDDDD....................  Industrial/Commercial/                     X
                            Institutional Boilers and
                            Process Heaters Major
                            Sources.
EEEEE....................  Iron Foundries..............               X
FFFFF....................  Integrated Iron and Steel...               X
GGGGG....................  Site Remediation............               X
HHHHH....................  Miscellaneous Coating                      X
                            Manufacturing.
IIIII....................  Mercury Cell Chlor-Alkali                  X
                            Plants.
JJJJJ....................  Brick and Structural Clay                  X
                            Products Manufacturing.
KKKKK....................  Clay Ceramics Manufacturing.               X
LLLLL....................  Asphalt Roofing and                        X
                            Processing.
MMMMM....................  Flexible Polyurethane Foam                 X
                            Fabrication Operation.
NNNNN....................  Hydrochloric Acid                          X
                            Production, Fumed Silica
                            Production.
OOOOO....................  (Reserved)..................  ...............
PPPPP....................  Engine Test Facilities......               X
QQQQQ....................  Friction Products                          X
                            Manufacturing.
RRRRR....................  Taconite Iron Ore Processing               X
SSSSS....................  Refractory Products                        X
                            Manufacture.
TTTTT....................  Primary Magnesium Refining..               X
------------------------------------------------------------------------
\1\ Program delegated to Oklahoma Department of Environmental Quality
  (ODEQ).
\2\ Authorities which may not be delegated include: Sec.   63.6(g),
  Approval of Alternative Non-Opacity Emission Standards; Sec.
  63.6(h)(9), Approval of Alternative Opacity Standards; Sec.
  63.7(e)(2)(ii) and (f), Approval of Major Alternatives to Test
  Methods; Sec.   63.8(f), Approval of Major Alternatives to Monitoring;
  Sec.   63.10(f), Approval of Major Alternatives to Recordkeeping and
  Reporting; and all authorities identified in the subparts (e.g., under
  ``Delegation of Authority'') that cannot be delegated.
\3\ The ODEQ has adopted this subpart unchanged and applied for
  delegation of the standard. The subpart was vacated and remanded to
  EPA by the United States Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia
  Circuit. See, Mossville Environmental Action Network v. EPA, 370 F. 3d
  1232 (D.C. Cir. 2004). Because of the D.C. Court's holding, this
  subpart is not delegated to ODEQ at this time.

* * * * *

[FR Doc. 2015-03803 Filed 2-23-15; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6560-50-P


[Federal Register Volume 78, Number 250 (Monday, December 30, 2013)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Page 79299]
[FR Doc No: 2013-31184]

=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES

Food and Drug Administration

21 CFR Part 558

[Docket No. FDA-2013-N-0002]

New Animal Drugs for Use in Animal Feeds; Bambermycins;
Correction

AGENCY: Food and Drug Administration, HHS.

ACTION: Final rule; correction.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Food and Drug Administration is correcting a document that
appeared in the Federal Register of December 16, 2013 (78 FR 76059).
The document amended the animal drug regulations to remove dairy
replacement heifers from the pasture cattle class for which free-
choice, loose-mineral medicated feeds containing bambermycins are
approved. The document was published with an incorrect docket number.
This document corrects that error.

DATES: Effective on December 16, 2013.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Joyce Strong, Office of Policy, Food
and Drug Administration, 10903 New Hampshire Ave., Bldg. 32, Rm. 3208,
Silver Spring, MD 20993-0002,<PHONE_NUMBER>.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: In the FR Doc. 2013-29810, appearing on page
76059 in the Federal Register of Monday, December 16, 2013 (78 FR
76059), the following correction is made:
    1. On page 76059, in the third column, the docket number is
corrected to read ``FDA-2013-N-0002.''

    Dated: December 24, 2013.
Bernadette Dunham,
Director, Center for Veterinary Medicine.
[FR Doc. 2013-31184 Filed 12-27-13; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4160-01-P