[Federal Register Volume 86, Number 110 (Thursday, June 10, 2021)]
[Notices]
[Pages 30969-30970]
[FR Doc No: 2021-12130]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY

Federal Emergency Management Agency

[Docket ID FEMA-2021-0002; Internal Agency Docket No. FEMA-B-2137]

Proposed Flood Hazard Determinations

AGENCY: Federal Emergency Management Agency, Department of Homeland
Security.

ACTION: Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: Comments are requested on proposed flood hazard
determinations, which may include additions or modifications of any
Base Flood Elevation (BFE), base flood depth, Special Flood Hazard Area
(SFHA) boundary or zone designation, or regulatory floodway on the
Flood Insurance Rate Maps (FIRMs), and where applicable, in the
supporting Flood Insurance Study (FIS) reports for the communities
listed in the table below. The purpose of this notice is to seek
general information and comment regarding the preliminary FIRM, and
where applicable, the FIS report that the Federal Emergency Management
Agency (FEMA) has provided to the affected communities. The FIRM and
FIS report are the basis of the floodplain management measures that the
community is required either to adopt or to show evidence of having in
effect in order to qualify or remain qualified for participation in the
National Flood Insurance Program (NFIP). In addition, the FIRM and FIS
report, once effective, will be used by insurance agents and others to
calculate appropriate flood insurance premium rates for new buildings
and the contents of those buildings.

DATES: Comments are to be submitted on or before September 8, 2021.

ADDRESSES: The Preliminary FIRM, and where applicable, the FIS report
for each community are available for inspection at both the online
location https://hazards.fema.gov/femaportal/prelimdownload and the
respective Community Map Repository address listed in the tables below.
Additionally, the current effective FIRM and FIS report for each
community are accessible online through the FEMA Map Service Center at
https://msc.fema.gov for comparison.
    You may submit comments, identified by Docket No. FEMA-B-2137, to
Rick Sacbibit, Chief, Engineering Services Branch, Federal Insurance
and Mitigation Administration, FEMA, 400 C Street SW, Washington, DC
20472,<PHONE_NUMBER>, or (email<EMAIL_ADDRESS>
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Rick Sacbibit, Chief, Engineering
Services Branch, Federal Insurance and Mitigation Administration, FEMA,
400 C Street SW, Washington, DC 20472,<PHONE_NUMBER>, or (email)
<EMAIL_ADDRESS>or visit the FEMA Mapping and Insurance
eXchange (FMIX) online at https://www.floodmaps.fema.gov/fhm/fmx_main.html.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: FEMA proposes to make flood hazard
determinations for each community listed below, in accordance with
section 110 of the Flood Disaster Protection Act of 1973, 42 U.S.C.
4104, and 44 CFR 67.4(a).
    These proposed flood hazard determinations, together with the
floodplain management criteria required by 44 CFR 60.3, are the minimum
that are required. They should not be construed to mean that the
community must change any existing ordinances that are more stringent
in their floodplain management requirements. The community may at any
time enact stricter requirements of its own or pursuant to policies
established by other Federal, State, or regional entities. These flood
hazard determinations are used to meet the floodplain management
requirements of the NFIP and are used to calculate the appropriate
flood insurance premium rates for new buildings built after the FIRM
and FIS report become effective.
    The communities affected by the flood hazard determinations are
provided in the tables below. Any request for reconsideration of the
revised flood hazard information shown on the Preliminary FIRM and FIS
report that satisfies the data requirements outlined in 44 CFR 67.6(b)
is considered an appeal. Comments unrelated to the flood hazard
determinations also will be considered before the FIRM and FIS report
become effective.
    Use of a Scientific Resolution Panel (SRP) is available to
communities in support of the appeal resolution process. SRPs are
independent panels of experts in hydrology, hydraulics, and other
pertinent sciences established to

review conflicting scientific and technical data and provide
recommendations for resolution. Use of the SRP only may be exercised
after FEMA and local communities have been engaged in a collaborative
consultation process for at least 60 days without a mutually acceptable
resolution of an appeal. Additional information regarding the SRP
process can be found online at https://www.floodsrp.org/pdfs/srp_overview.pdf.
    The watersheds and/or communities affected are listed in the tables
below. The Preliminary FIRM, and where applicable, FIS report for each
community are available for inspection at both the online location
https://hazards.fema.gov/femaportal/prelimdownload and the respective
Community Map Repository address listed in the tables. For communities
with multiple ongoing Preliminary studies, the studies can be
identified by the unique project number and Preliminary FIRM date
listed in the tables. Additionally, the current effective FIRM and FIS
report for each community are accessible online through the FEMA Map
Service Center at https://msc.fema.gov for comparison.

(Catalog of Federal Domestic Assistance No. 97.022, ``Flood
Insurance.'')

Michael M. Grimm,
Assistant Administrator for Risk Management, Department of Homeland
Security, Federal Emergency Management Agency.

------------------------------------------------------------------------
                                             Community map repository
               Community                             address
------------------------------------------------------------------------
             Liberty County, Georgia and Incorporated Areas
        Project: 19-04-0001S Preliminary Date: November 12, 2020
------------------------------------------------------------------------
City of Flemington.....................  City Hall, 156 Old Sunbury
                                          Road, Flemington, GA 31313.
City of Hinesville.....................  City Hall, 115 East Martin
                                          Luther King, Jr. Drive,
                                          Hinesville, GA 31313.
Unincorporated Areas of Liberty County.  Liberty County Courthouse
                                          Annex, 112 North Main Street,
                                          Room 1200, Hinesville, GA
                                          31313.
------------------------------------------------------------------------

[FR Doc. 2021-12130 Filed 6-9-21; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 9110-12-P


[Federal Register Volume 75, Number 240 (Wednesday, December 15, 2010)]
[Notices]
[Page 78233]
[FR Doc No: 2010-31412]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission

 [Project No. 13738-000; Project No. 13761-000; Project No. 13770-000]

Lock+\TM\ Hydro Friends Fund XXXVII; FFP Missouri 6, LLC; Solia 1
Hydroelectric, LLC; Notice of Competing Preliminary Permit Applications
Accepted for Filing and Soliciting Comments, and Motions To Intervene

December 8, 2010.
    On May 18, 2010, Lock+ Hydro Friends Fund XXXVII, FFP Missouri 6,
LLC, and Solia 1 Hydroelectric, LLC, filed an application, pursuant to
section 4(f) of the Federal Power Act, proposing to study the
feasibility of hydropower at the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers Emsworth
Back Channel Dam on the Ohio River in Allegheny County, Pennsylvania.
The sole purpose of a preliminary permit, if issued, is to grant the
permit holder priority to file a license application during the permit
term. A preliminary permit does not authorize the permit holder to
perform any land-disturbing activities or otherwise enter upon lands or
waters owned by others without the owners' express permission.
    Descriptions of the proposed Emsworth Back Channel Dam Projects:
Lock+TM Hydro Friends Fund XXXVII's proposed project
(Project No. 13738-000) would consist of: (1) Two lock frame modules
109 feet long, 40 feet high, and weighing 1.16 million pounds each, and
containing 10 generating units each with a total combined capacity of
36 megawatts (MW); (2) each lock frame module would be housed between
two 30-foot-high and 75-foot-long prefabricated concrete walls; (3) a
25-foot-long, 50-foot-wide switchyard containing a transformer; and (4)
a 4,000-foot-long, 69-kilovolt (kV) transmission line to an existing
substation. The proposed project would have an average annual
generation of 157.78 gigawatt-hours (GWh), which would be sold to a
local utility.
    Applicant Contact: Mr. Mark R. Stover, Hydro Green Energy LLC, 5090
Richmond Avenue 390, Houston, TX 77056; phone<PHONE_NUMBER>
x709.
    FFP Missouri 6, LLC's proposed project (Project No. 13761-000)
would consist of: (1) An excavated intake and tailrace channel slightly
longer and wider than the powerhouse; (2) a 200-foot-long, 200-foot-
wide, 50-foot-high powerhouse containing five turbine generator units
having a total installed capacity of 32.7 MW; and (3) a 13,300-foot-
long, transmission line ranging from 34.0 to 230-kV. The proposed
project would have an average annual generation of 141.3 GWh, which
would be sold to a local utility.
    Applicant Contact: Ms. Ramya Swaminathan, Free Flow Power
Corporation, 33 Commercial Street, Gloucester, MA 01930; phone (978)
283-2822.
    Solia 1 Hydroelectric, LLC's proposed project (Project No. 13770-
000) would consist of: (1) A 300-foot-long, 160-foot-wide excavated
intake channel; (2) a 200-foot-long, 160-foot-wide excavated tailrace;
(3) a 200-foot-long, 200-foot-wide, 50-foot-high concrete powerhouse
containing two generating units with a combined capacity of 32 MW; and
(4) a 2.47-mile-long transmission line ranging from 34.0 to 230-kV. The
proposed project would have an average annual generation of 141.3 GWh,
which would be sold to a local utility.
    Applicant Contact: Mr. Douglas Spaulding, P.E., Nelson Energy, 8441
Wayzata Blvd., Suite 101, Golden Valley, MN, 55426; phone (952) 544-
8133.
    FERC Contact: Gaylord Hoisington,<PHONE_NUMBER>.
    Deadline for filing comments, motions to intervene, competing
applications (without notices of intent), or notices of intent to file
competing applications: 60 Days from the issuance of this notice.
Competing applications and notices of intent must meet the requirements
of 18 CFR 4.36. Comments, motions to intervene, notices of intent, and
competing applications may be filed electronically via the Internet.
See 18 CFR 385.2001(a)(1)(iii) and the instructions on the Commission's
Web site http://www.ferc.gov/docs-filing/efiling.asp. Commenters can
submit brief comments up to 6,000 characters, without prior
registration, using the eComment system at http://www.ferc.gov/docs-filing/ecomment.asp. You must include your name and contact information
at the end of your comments. For assistance, please contact FERC Online
Support at<EMAIL_ADDRESS>call toll-free at (866) 208-
3676; or, for TTY, contact<PHONE_NUMBER>. Although the Commission
strongly encourages electronic filing, documents may also be paper-
filed. To paper-file, mail an original and seven copies to: Kimberly D.
Bose, Secretary, Federal Energy Regulatory Commission, 888 First
Street, NE., Washington, DC 20426.
    More information about this project, including a copy of the
application, can be viewed or printed on the ``eLibrary'' link of the
Commission's Web site at http://www.ferc.gov/docs-filing/elibrary.asp.
Enter the docket number (P-13738-000, 13761-000, or 13770-000) in the
docket number field to access the document. For assistance, contact
FERC Online Support.

Kimberly D. Bose,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2010-31412 Filed 12-14-10; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6717-01-P


UNITED STATES OF AMERICA

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION

OFFICE OF THE SECRETARY

WASHINGTON, DC

Issued by the Department of Transportation on February 15, 2006

   NOTICE OF ACTION TAKEN -- DOCKET OST-2005-22832

________________________________________________________________________
_________________________________

This serves as notice to the public of the action described below, taken
by the Department official indicated (no additional confirming order
will be issued in this matter).

Application of AMERICA WEST AIRLINES, INC. d/b/a US AIRWAYS (AMERICA
WEST) filed 10/24/05 for:

XX  Exemption under 49 U.S.C. 40109 to provide the following service:

Scheduled foreign air transportation of persons, property, and mail from
(1) points in the United States via the Azores and Lisbon (Portugal) to
Madrid, Barcelona, Malaga, and Palma de Mallorca (Spain) as coterminals,
(2) points in the United States via intermediate points to
Dublin/Shannon, Ireland, and (3) points in the United States via
intermediate points to points in the United Kingdom excluding Heathrow
and Gatwick.  America West also seeks route integration authority to
combine this exemption authority with its existing authorities.  America
West plans to serve the requested points by placing its “HP” or
“US*” designator code on flights operated by US Airways, Inc. (US
Airways).  America West requests that the authority be effective for at
least three years.

Applicant reps: David M. Kirstein<PHONE_NUMBER>   DOT Analyst: Thuy H.
Cooper<PHONE_NUMBER>

D I S P O S I T I O N

XX  Granted in part (two-year award) (subject to conditions, see
below)(see remarks, below)

XX  Dismissed request for longer-term authority (see remarks, below)

The above action granting exemption authority was effective when taken:
February 15, 2006, through February 15, 2008.

Action taken by:   Paul L. Gretch, Director

		      Office of International Aviation

XX  The authority granted is consistent with the aviation agreements
between the United States and Spain and the United States and the United
Kingdom, and with our overall aviation relationship with Ireland.

Except to the extent exempted or waived, this authority is subject to
the terms, conditions, and limitations indicated:

XX Holder’s certificates of public convenience and necessity

XX Standard exemption conditions (attached)

Remarks: American Airlines, Inc. (American) objected to the portion of
America West’s application that seeks exemption authority to display
the HP* code on flights operated by US Airways between the U.S. and
Ireland.  American states that the Department should not approve the
America West application until it has acted favorably on the pending
application by Aer Lingus (in Dockets OST-2000-6726 and OST-2000-6728)
to display American’s “AA*” designator code on flights operated by
Aer Lingus between London (Heathrow) and Ireland.  America West replied
requesting that the Department proceed to approve its application.  By
Order 2006-2-9, the Department granted the Aer Lingus application cited
by American.

Consistent with our standard practice for this type of application, we
have granted America West exemption authority for two years, and have
dismissed its request for longer term authority.

Conditions:  The authority granted to serve intermediate and beyond
points is limited to countries with which the United States has signed
open-skies agreements and/or countries for which America West holds
authority to serve under certificates or exemptions issued by the
Department.

The code-share operations conducted under this authorization are subject
to the following conditions:

(a) The code-sharing operations conducted under this authority must
comply with 14 CFR 257 and with any amendment to the Department’s
regulations concerning code-share arrangements that may be adopted.
Notwithstanding any provisions in the contract between the carriers, our
approval here is expressly conditioned upon the requirements that the
subject foreign air transportation be sold in the name of the carrier
holding out such service in computer reservation systems and elsewhere;
that the carrier selling such transportation (i.e., the carrier shown on
the ticket) accept responsibility for the entirety of the code-share
journey for all obligations established in its contract of carriage with
the passenger; and that the passenger liability of the operating carrier
be unaffected; and

(b) The authority granted here is specifically conditioned so that
neither America West nor US Airways shall give any force or effect to
any contractual provisions between themselves that are contrary to these
conditions.

The route integration authority granted is subject to the condition that
any service provided under this exemption shall be consistent with all
applicable agreements between the United States and the foreign
countries involved.  Furthermore, (a) nothing in the award of the route
integration authority granted should be construed as conferring upon
America West rights (including fifth-freedom intermediate and/or beyond
rights) to serve markets where U.S. carrier entry is limited unless
America West notifies the Department of its intent to serve such a
market and unless and until the Department has completed any necessary
carrier selection procedures to determine which carrier(s) should be
authorized to exercise such rights); (b) should there be a request by
any carrier to use the limited-entry route rights that are included in
America West’s authority by virtue of the route integration exemption
granted here, but that are not then being used by America West, the
holding of such authority by route integration will not be considered as
providing any preference for America West in a competitive carrier
selection proceeding to determine which carrier(s) should be entitled to
use the authority at issue.

________________________________________________________________________
_____________

On the basis of data officially noticeable under Rule 24(g) of the
Department's regulations, we found the applicant qualified to provide
the exemption services authorized.

Under authority assigned by the Department in its regulations, 14 CFR
Part 385, we found that (1) our action was consistent with Department
policy; (2) grant of the authority was consistent with the public
interest; and (3) grant of the authority would not constitute a major
regulatory action under the Energy Policy and Conservation Act of 1975.
To the extent not granted or dismissed, we denied all requests in the
referenced Docket.  We may amend, modify, or revoke the authority
granted in this Notice at any time without hearing at our discretion.

Persons entitled to petition the Department for review of the action set
forth in this Notice under the Department’s regulations, 14 CFR
§385.30, may file their petitions within seven (7) days after the date
of issuance of this Notice.  This action was effective when taken, and
the filing of a petition for review will not alter such effectiveness.

An electronic version of this document is available on the World Wide
Web at:

  HYPERLINK "http://dms.dot.gov//reports/reports_aviation.asp"
http://dms.dot.gov//reports/reports_aviation.asp

U.S. Carrier Exemption Conditions

In the conduct of the operations authorized, the U.S. carrier
applicant(s) shall:

(1)  Hold at all times effective operating authority from the government
of each country served;

(2)  Comply with applicable requirements concerning oversales contained
in 14 CFR 250 (for scheduled operations, if authorized);

(3)  Comply with the requirements for reporting data contained in 14 CFR
241;

(4)  Comply with requirements for minimum insurance coverage, and for
certifying that coverage to the Department, contained in 14 CFR 205;

(5)  Except as specifically exempted or otherwise provided for in a
Department Order, comply with the requirements of 14 CFR 203, concerning
waiver of Warsaw Convention liability limits and defenses;

(6)  Comply with all applicable requirements of the Federal Aviation
Administration and with all applicable U.S. Government requirements
concerning security, including, but not limited to, 49 CFR Part 1544.
To assure compliance with all applicable U.S. Government requirements
concerning security, the holder shall, before commencing any new service
(including charter flights) to or from a foreign airport, contact its
International Principal Security Inspector (IPSI) to advise the IPSI of
its plans and to find out whether the Transportation Security
Administration has determined that security is adequate to allow such
airport(s) to be served; and

(7)  Comply with such other reasonable terms, conditions, and
limitations required by the public interest as may be prescribed by the
Department of Transportation, with all applicable orders and regulations
of other U.S. agencies and courts, and with all applicable laws of the
United States.

The authority granted shall be effective only during the period when the
holder is in compliance with the conditions imposed above.

05/2004

 America West states that on September 27, 2005, America West Holdings
Corporation merged with US Airways Group, Inc.  As a result, America
West became a subsidiary of US Airways Group, Inc.  America West will
continue to operate under its own certificate of public convenience and
necessity and authorities until both America West and US Airways, Inc.
are integrated under a single certificate.

 PAGE


[Federal Register: June 11, 2009 (Volume 74, Number 111)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Page 27706-27707]
[DOCID:fr11jn09-12]

=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES

Food and Drug Administration

21 CFR Part 520

[Docket No. FDA-2009-N-0665]

Oral Dosage Form New Animal Drugs; Methimazole

AGENCY: Food and Drug Administration, HHS.

ACTION: Final rule.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Food and Drug Administration (FDA) is amending the animal
drug regulations to reflect the original approval of a new animal drug
application (NADA) filed by Dechra, Ltd. The NADA provides for the
veterinary prescription use of methimazole tablets in cats for
treatment of hyperthyroidism.

DATES: This rule is effective June 11, 2009.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:  Melanie R. Berson, Center for
Veterinary Medicine (HFV-110), Food and Drug Administration, 7500
Standish Pl., Rockville, MD 20855,<PHONE_NUMBER>, e-mail:
<EMAIL_ADDRESS>
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Dechra, Ltd., Dechra House, Jamage
Industrial Estate, Talke Pits, Stoke-on-Trent, Staffordshire, ST7 1XW,
United Kingdom, filed NADA 141-292 that provides for veterinary
prescription use of FELIMAZOLE (methimazole) Coated Tablets in cats for
the treatment of hyperthyroidism. The NADA is approved as of May 27,
2009, and the regulations are amended in 21 CFR part 520 to reflect the
approval.
    In accordance with the freedom of information provisions of 21 CFR
part 20 and 21 CFR 514.11(e)(2)(ii), a summary of safety and
effectiveness data and information submitted to support approval of
this application may be seen in the Division of Dockets Management
(HFA-305), Food and Drug Administration, 5630 Fishers Lane, rm. 1061,
Rockville, MD 20852, between 9

a.m. and 4 p.m., Monday through Friday.
    Under section 512(c)(2)(F)(i) of the Federal Food, Drug, and
Cosmetic Act (21 U.S.C. 360b(c)(2)(F)(i)), this approval qualifies for
5 years of marketing exclusivity beginning on the date of approval.
    FDA has determined under 21 CFR 25.33 that this action is of a type
that does not individually or cumulatively have a significant effect on
the human environment. Therefore, neither an environmental assessment
nor an environmental impact statement is required.
    This rule does not meet the definition of ``rule'' in 5 U.S.C.
804(3)(A) because it is a rule of ``particular applicability.''
Therefore, it is not subject to the congressional review requirements
in 5 U.S.C. 801-808.

List of Subjects in 21 CFR Part 520

    Animal drugs.

0
Therefore, under the Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act and under
authority delegated to the Commissioner of Food and Drugs and
redelegated to the Center for Veterinary Medicine, 21 CFR part 520 is
amended as follows:

PART 520--ORAL DOSAGE FORM NEW ANIMAL DRUGS

0
1. The authority citation for 21 CFR part 520 continues to read as
follows:

    Authority:  21 U.S.C. 360b.

0
2. Add Sec.  520.1372 to read as follows:

Sec.  520.1372   Methimazole.

    (a) Specifications. Each tablet contains 2.5 or 5 milligrams (mg)
methimazole.
    (b) Sponsor. See No. 043264 in Sec.  510.600 of this chapter.
    (c) Conditions of use in cats--(1) Amount. The starting dose is 2.5
mg every 12 hours. Following 3 weeks of treatment, the dose should be
titrated to effect based on individual serum total T4 levels and
clinical response.
    (2) Indications for use. For the treatment of hyperthyroidism.
    (3) Limitations. Federal law restricts this drug to use by or on
the order of a licensed veterinarian.

    Dated: June 5, 2009.
Bernadette Dunham,
Director, Center for Veterinary Medicine.
[FR Doc. E9-13685 Filed 6-10-09; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4160-01-S


the Coast Guard Outer Continental Shelf National Center of Expertise
(OCS NCOE):
    (1) A DP system description, including a block diagram and
functional relationships of various components.
    (2) Specifications of position reference and environmental
monitoring sensors or systems.
    (3) The location of thrusters and control system components.
    (4) Details of the DP system monitoring and alarm system and
interconnection with the main centralized monitoring and alarm system.
    (5) DP system Failure Modes and Effects Analysis (FMEA) and FMEA
proving test documents as described in Sec.  62.40-15 and Sec.  62.40-
20 of this part, respectively.
    (6) The Critical Activity Mode of Operation determined from the
initial survey required by Sec.  61.50-5 of this subchapter.
    (7) Designer or manufacturer self-certification of the DP system
control equipment to the environmental design standards in Sec.  62.25-
40 of this part. See Sec.  62.20-5 of this part.
    (c) The DPSAO that performs the surveys under subpart 61.50 of this
subchapter must submit a copy of the approved plans under paragraph (b)
of this section and the results of the initial survey, including the
FMEA proving test required by subpart 61.50 of this subchapter to the
Commanding Officer, Marine Safety Center, U.S. Coast Guard Stop 7410,
4200 Wilson Blvd., Suite 400, Arlington, VA 20598-7410. The Commanding
Officer, Marine Safety Center may elect to review the plans to validate
compliance with the requirements of this subpart and advise the DPSAO,
the Coast Guard OSCNCOE and the cognizant Officer in Charge, Marine
Inspection.
0
16. Add new Sec.  62.25-40 to read as follows:

Sec.  62.25-40  Environmental design standards.

    (a) The following Mobile Offshore Drilling Units (MODUs) and
vessels, other than MODUs, must comply with the provisions of this
section:
    (1) MODUs that use a dynamic positioning (DP) system to conduct
Critical Outer Continental Shelf (OCS) Activities, as defined in 33 CFR
140.305, on the U.S. OCS; and
    (2) Vessels other than MODUs that use a DP system installed on or
after [30 DAYS AFTER DATE OF PUBLICATION OF FINAL RULE] to conduct
Critical OCS Activities, as defined in 33 CFR 140.305, on the U.S. OCS.
    (b) Computer-based systems, microprocessors, storage devices, power
supply units, signal conditioners, analog/digital converters, computer
monitors (visual display units), keyboards, reference sensors, and
related systems (excluding printers), and data recording or logging
devices must be designed to the environmental standards in Clause 5 of
IEC 60092-504 (incorporated by reference, see Sec.  62.05-1).
0
17. Add new subpart 62.40, consisting of Sec. Sec.  62.40-1 through
62.40-25, to read as follows:
Subpart 62.40--Dynamic Positioning Systems
Sec.
62.40-1 Applicability.
62.40-3 Minimum dynamic positioning system requirements.
62.40-5 Design for Critical OCS Activities.
62.40-10 Classification for Critical OCS Activities.
62.40-15 Failure Modes and Effects Analysis (FMEA).
62.40-20 Failure Modes and Effects Analysis (FMEA) proving test
document.
62.40-25 Critical Activity Mode of Operation (CAMO).

Subpart 62.40--Dynamic Positioning Systems

Sec.  62.40-1  Applicability.

    This subpart applies to all vessels, including Mobile Offshore
Drilling Units (MODUs), that use a dynamic positioning (DP) system to
conduct Outer Continental Shelf (OCS) activities, as defined in 33 CFR
140.10, on the U.S. OCS. ``Vessels,'' for purposes of this subpart,
include but are not limited to MODUs.

Sec.  62.40-3  Minimum dynamic positioning system requirements.

    Vessels to which this subpart applies must meet the applicable
requirements of this part and 46 CFR 62.35-5 and 46 CFR 62.50-30 for
remote propulsion control systems with periodically unattended
machinery plants, as well as paragraph 3.4.1 of IMO MSC/Circ.645
(incorporated by reference, see Sec.  62.05-1), except subparagraph
<IP_ADDRESS>.

Sec.  62.40-5  Design for Critical OCS Activities.

    (a) The following vessels must comply with the provisions of this
section:
    (1) MODUs that use a dynamic positioning (DP) system to conduct
Critical Outer Continental Shelf (OCS) Activities, as defined in 33 CFR
140.305, on the U.S. OCS; and
    (2) Vessels other than MODUs that use a DP system installed on or
after (30 DAYS AFTER DATE OF PUBLICATION OF FINAL RULE) to conduct
Critical OCS Activities, as defined in 33 CFR 140.305, on the U.S. OCS.
    (b) Vessels to which this section applies must meet the provisions
of IMO MSC/Circ.645 (incorporated by reference, see Sec.  62.05-1) and
the provisions of the applicable MTS DP Operations Guide (incorporated
by reference, see Sec.  62.05-1) relevant to equipment class 2 (DP-2)
or higher for MODUs, project construction vessels, or logistics
vessels, as appropriate.

Sec.  62.40-10  Classification for Critical OCS Activities.

    (a) The following vessels must comply with the provisions of this
section:
    (1) MODUs that use a dynamic positioning (DP) system to conduct
Critical Outer Continental Shelf (OCS) Activities, as defined in 33 CFR
140.305, on the U.S. OCS; and
    (2) Vessels other than MODUs that use a DP system installed on or
after (30 DAYS AFTER DATE OF PUBLICATION OF FINAL RULE) to conduct
Critical OCS Activities, as defined in 33 CFR 140.305, on the U.S. OCS.
    (b) Vessels to which this section applies must obtain an IMO MSC/
Circ.645 equipment class 2 (DP-2) or

higher notation from a classification society that meets the
requirements of paragraph (c) of this section.
    (c) The classification society that issues an equipment class 2
(DP-2) or higher notation to vessels under this section applies must--
    (1) Comply with the provisions of 46 CFR, part 8, subpart B;
    (2) Possess DP system rules aligned with IMO MSC/Circ.645 and the
MTS DP Operations Guide (incorporated by reference, see Sec.  62.05-1)
applicable to the vessel being classed; and,
    (3) Submit evidence that it complies with paragraphs c(1) and c(2)
of this section to the Coast Guard Outer Continental Shelf National
Center of Expertise (OCS NCOE), which will authorize the classification
society to issue notations as described in this section.

Sec.  62.40-15  Failure Modes and Effects Analysis (FMEA).

    (a) The following vessels must comply with the provisions of this
section:
    (1) Vessels other than MODUs of more than 500 GT ITC (500 GRT if GT
ITC not assigned) that use a dynamic positioning (DP) system installed
before (30 DAYS AFTER DATE OF PUBLICATION OF FINAL RULE) to conduct
Critical Outer Continental Shelf (OCS) Activities, as defined in 33 CFR
140.305, on the U.S. OCS;
    (2) Vessels other than MODUs that use a DP system installed on or
after (30 DAYS AFTER DATE OF PUBLICATION OF FINAL RULE) to conduct
Critical OCS Activities; and
    (3) MODUs that use a DP system to conduct Critical OCS Activities,
as defined in 33 CFR 140.305, on the U.S. OCS.
    (b) The owner or operator of each vessel to which this section
applies must complete and maintain an FMEA with the details necessary
to demonstrate compliance with the applicable provisions of IMO MSC/
Circ.645 and must demonstrate compliance with the MTS DP Operations
Guide (both incorporated by reference, see Sec.  62.05-1) for equipment
class 2 (DP-2) or equipment class 3 (DP-3) requirements and this
subpart, as applicable.
    (c) Vessels described in paragraph (a)(1) of this section must
comply with the provisions of this section no later than the applicable
date in 33 CFR table 140.335.
    (d) Alternative guidance may be used in lieu of the MTS DP
Operations Guide to meet the requirements of this section if permitted
by the Office of Design and Engineering Standards (Commandant (CG-ENG))
to the extent and under conditions that will ensure a degree of safety
comparable to or greater than that provided by use of the MTS DP
Operations Guide.

Sec.  62.40-20  Failure Modes and Effects Analysis (FMEA) proving test
document.

    (a) The owner or operator of each vessel to which Sec.  62.40-15 of
this subpart applies must complete and maintain a dynamic positioning
system FMEA proving test document that--
    (1) Provides the necessary test instructions, based on the FMEA
required by this subpart, to demonstrate design and operation in
accordance with the equipment class of the DP system and this subpart;
and
    (2) Is approved by the Marine Safety Center under Sec.  62.20-2 of
this part and retained on board.

Sec.  62.40-25  Critical Activity Mode of Operation (CAMO).

    (a) The owner or operator of each vessel to which Sec.  62.40-15 of
this subpart applies must complete and maintain a CAMO as defined in
Sec.  62.10-1 of this part.

    Dated: November 13, 2014.
J.G. Lantz,
Director of Commercial Regulations and Standards, U.S. Coast Guard.
[FR Doc. 2014-27594 Filed 11-26-14; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 9110-04-P


[Federal Register Volume 81, Number 36 (Wednesday, February 24, 2016)]
[Notices]
[Page 9180]
[FR Doc No: 2016-03839]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission

Notice of Filing

------------------------------------------------------------------------
                                                            Docket No.
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Richardson, Alan C......................................     ID-7484-003
Chahley, Kris...........................................     ID-7783-001
------------------------------------------------------------------------

    Take notice that on February 18, 2016, Alan C. Richardson and Kris
Chahley submitted for filing, an application for authority to hold
interlocking positions, pursuant to section 305(b) of the Federal Power
Act (FPA) \1\ and Part 45.8 (2015) of the Federal Energy Regulatory
Commission's (Commission) \2\ Rules of Practice and Procedure.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \1\ 16 U.S.C. 825d(b) (2015).
    \2\ 18 CFR part 45 (2015).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    Any person desiring to intervene or to protest this filing must
file in accordance with Rules 211 and 214 of the Commission's Rules of
Practice and Procedure (18 CFR 385.211, 385.214). Protests will be
considered by the Commission in determining the appropriate action to
be taken, but will not serve to make protestants parties to the
proceeding. Any person wishing to become a party must file a notice of
intervention or motion to intervene, as appropriate. Such notices,
motions, or protests must be filed on or before the comment date. On or
before the comment date, it is not necessary to serve motions to
intervene or protests on persons other than the Applicant.
    The Commission encourages electronic submission of protests and
interventions in lieu of paper using the ``eFiling'' link at http://www.ferc.gov. Persons unable to file electronically should submit an
original and 5 copies of the protest or intervention to the Federal
Energy Regulatory Commission, 888 First Street NE., Washington, DC
20426.
    This filing is accessible on-line at http://www.ferc.gov, using the
``eLibrary'' link and is available for electronic review in the
Commission's Public Reference Room in Washington, DC. There is an
``eSubscription'' link on the Web site that enables subscribers to
receive email notification when a document is added to a subscribed
docket(s). For assistance with any FERC Online service, please email
<EMAIL_ADDRESS>or call<PHONE_NUMBER> (toll free). For
TTY, call<PHONE_NUMBER>.
    Comment Date: 5:00 p.m. Eastern Time on March 10, 2016.

    Dated: February 18, 2016.
Nathaniel J. Davis, Sr.,
Deputy Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2016-03839 Filed 2-23-16; 8:45 am]
 BILLING CODE 6717-01-P


[Federal Register: November 27, 2006 (Volume 71, Number 227)]
[Notices]
[Page 68595-68597]
[DOCID:fr27no06-89]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission

Combined Notice of Filings 1

November 17, 2006.
    Take notice that the Commission received the following electric
corporate filings:

    Docket Numbers: EC07-17-000.
    Applicants: Suez Energy North America, Inc.
    Description: SUEZ S.A & SUEZ Energy North America, Inc., et al.,
submits application requesting authorization for a change of control
due to a merger with GDF over the jurisdictional facilities owned by
SENA on 11/9/06.
    Filed Date: 11/14/2006.
    Accession Number: 20061115-0352.
    Comment Date: 5 p.m. Eastern Time on Tuesday, December 5, 2006.

    Docket Numbers: EC07-18-000.
    Applicants: Wachovia Investment Holdings, LLC.
    Description: Gamesa Energyia SAU, et al., submits an application
for Order Authorization Disposition of Jurisdictional Facilities under
Section 203 of the FPAS.
    Filed Date: 11/08/2006.
    Accession Number: 20061114-0035.
    Comment Date: 5 p.m. Eastern Time on Wednesday, November 29, 2006.

    Take notice that the Commission received the following exempt
wholesale generator filings:

    Docket Numbers: EG07-11-000.
    Applicants: Loess Hills Wind Farm, LLC.
    Description: Notice of Self-Certification of Loess Hills Wind Farm,
LLC demonstrating that it is an Exempt Wholesale Generator under EG07-
11.
    Filed Date: 11/08/2006.
    Accession Number: 20061116-0097.
    Comment Date: 5 p.m. Eastern Time on Wednesday, November 29, 2006.

    Docket Numbers: EG07-12-000.

    Applicants: Locust Ridge Wind Farm, LLC.
    Description: Locust Ridge Wind Farm, LLC's Notice of Self-
Certification as an Exempt Wholesale Generator under EG07-12.
    Filed Date: 11/13/2006.
    Accession Number: 20061116-0098.
    Comment Date: 5 p.m. Eastern Time on Monday, December 4, 2006.

    Take notice that the Commission received the following electric
rate filings:

    Docket Numbers: ER97-2801-015.
    Applicants: PacifiCorp.
    Description: PacifiCorp & PPM Energy, Inc., submits a corrected
version of their 3/29/06 compliance filing reflecting certain limited
errata recently discoverd, etc., under ER97-2801, et al.
    Filed Date: 11/6/2006.
    Accession Number: 20061109-0069.
    Comment Date: 5 p.m. Eastern Time on Monday, November 27, 2006.

    Docket Numbers: ER01-2217-005.
    Applicants: Sunrise Power Company, LLC.
    Description: Sunrise Power Co., LLC, submits Sub Original Sheet 5,
et al., as part of its FERC Electric Tariff, First Revised Volume 1 in
compliance with FERC's 11/3/06 Order under ER01-2217.
    Filed Date: 11/13/2006.
    Accession Number: 20061116-0041.
    Comment Date: 5 p.m. Eastern Time on Monday, December 4, 2006.

    Docket Numbers: ER03-821-002.
    Applicants: One Nation Energy Solutions, LLC.
    Description: One Nation Energy Solutions LLC submits its First
Revised Rate Schedule umder ER03-821.
    Filed Date: 11/8/2006.
    Accession Number: 20061116-0092.
    Comment Date: 5 p.m. Eastern Time on Wednesday, November 29, 2006.

    Docket Numbers: ER05-1178-006; ER05-1191-006.
    Applicants: Gila River Power, L.P.; Union Power Partners, LP.
    Description: Gila River Power, LP and Union Power Partners, LP
submits Notice of Non-Material Change in Status relating to their
upstream ownership structure under ER05-1178, et al.
    Filed Date: 11/13/2006.
    Accession Number: 20061116-0040.
    Comment Date: 5 p.m. Eastern Time on Monday, December 4, 2006.

    Docket Numbers: ER06-115-001.
    Applicants: LSP South Bay, LLC.
    Description: Refund Report of LSP South Bay, LLC under ER06-115.
    Filed Date: 11/08/2006.
    Accession Number: 20061108-5010.
    Comment Date: 5 p.m. Eastern Time on Wednesday, November 29, 2006.

    Docket Numbers: ER03-1288-002.
    Applicants: Rocky Mountain Energy Center, LLC.
    Description: Rocky Mountain Energy Center LLC submits a Substitute
First Revised Sheet 3 for its FERC Electric Tariff 1, which is to
replace the First Revised Sheet 3 that was filed 10/3/06 under ER03-
1288.
    Filed Date: 11/6/2006.
    Accession Number: 20061108-0091.
    Comment Date: 5 p.m. Eastern Time on Monday, November 27, 2006.

    Docket Numbers: ER06-1308-003.
    Applicants: Midwest ISO.
    Description: Midwest Independent Transmission System Operator,
Inc., submits copies of a clean and redlined revisions to Sheet 966A
and 966C of FERC Electric Rate Schedule 10-C, etc., under ER06-1308.
    Filed Date: 11/14/2006.
    Accession Number: 20061116-0087.
    Comment Date: 5 p.m. Eastern Time on Tuesday, December 5, 2006.

    Docket Numbers: ER06-1362-001.
    Applicants: Southwest Power Pool, Inc.
    Description: Southwest Power Pool, Inc., submits this compliance
filing providing revisions to its Open Access Transmission Tariff
pursuant to the Commission's Order issued 10/13/06 under ER06-1362.
    Filed Dates: 11/13/2006; 11/15/06.
    Accession Number: 20061116-0032.
    Comment Date: 5 p.m. Eastern Time on Monday, December 4, 2006.

    Docket Numbers: ER06-321-005.
    Applicants: Midwest ISO; Midwest ISO Transmission Owners; Michigan
Electric Transmission Company; International Company; WPS Resourced
Corporation; Wisconsin Electric Power Company.
    Description: Agreement among the Midwest ISO Transmission Owners
and the Midwest Independent Transmission System Operator, Inc.,
relating to the Role of the Independent Market Monitor under ER06-321.
    Filed Date: 11/13/2006.
    Accession Number: 20061116-0082.
    Comment Date: 5 p.m. Eastern Time on Monday, December 4, 2006.

    Docket Numbers: ER07-186-000.
    Applicants: California Independent System Operator.
    Description: California Independent System Operator Corp., submits
an informational filing intended to provide notice re the revised
transmission Access Charges effective 9/1/06 under ER07-186.
    Filed Date: 11/7/2006.
    Accession Number: 20061109-0101.
    Comment Date: 5 p.m. Eastern Time on Tuesday, November 28, 2006.

    Docket Numbers: ER07-197-000.
    Applicants: ISO New England, Inc.
    Description: ISO New England Inc., et al., submits revisions to the
MEPCO Transmission Operating Agreement b/w ISO and MEPCO to include the
Chester Static VAR Compensator as a covered facility etc., under ER07-
197.
    Filed Date: 11/9/2006.
    Accession Number: 20061114-0058.
    Comment Date: 5 p.m. Eastern Time on Thursday, November 30, 2006.

    Docket Numbers: ER07-199-000.
    Applicants: PJM Interconnection, LLC.
    Description: PJM Interconnection, LLC submits an executed Wholesale
Market Participation Agreement with Southeastern Chester County Refuse
Authority under ER07-199.
    Filed Date: 11/13/2006.
    Accession Number: 20061116-0038.
    Comment Date: 5 p.m. Eastern Time on Monday, December 4, 2006.

    Docket Numbers: ER07-200-000.
    Applicants: Southwest Power Pool, Inc.
    Description: Southwest Power Pool Inc., submits an executed
Interconnection Agreement between itself, Kansas Gas and Electric Co.,
et al., designated as Service Agreement 1298, to become effective 10/1/
06 under ER07-200.
    Filed Date: 11/13/2006.
    Accession Number: 20061116-0039.
    Comment Date: 5 p.m. Eastern Time on Monday, December 4, 2006.

    Docket Numbers: ER07-202-000.
    Applicants: E. ON U.S. LLC.
    Description: E. ON U.S. LLC, Louisville Gas and Electric Co., and
Kentucky Utilities Co., submits an executed amended service agreement
with Illinois Municipal Electric Agency under ER07-202.
    Filed Date: 11/13/2006.
    Accession Number: 20061116-0042.
    Comment Date: 5 p.m. Eastern Time on Monday, December 4, 2006.

    Docket Numbers: ER07-206-000.
    Applicants: PJM Interconnection, LLC.
    Description: PJM Interconnection, LLC submits an executed Wholesale
Market Participation Agreement with Great Bear Hydropower, Inc., et
al., pusuant to Section 205 of the Federal Power Act etc., under ER07-
206.
    Filed Date: 11/14/2006.
    Accession Number: 20061116-0035.
    Comment Date: 5 p.m. Eastern Time on Tuesday, December 5, 2006.

    Docket Numbers: ER07-207-000.
    Applicants: WPS Resources Corporation.
    Description: WPS Resources Operating Companies on behalf of

Wisconsin Public Service Corp., et al., submits a notice of
cancellation and a revised service agreement cover sheet to terminate a
Service Agreement etc., under ER07-207.
    Filed Date: 11/13/2006.
    Accession Number: 20061116-0036.
    Comment Date: 5 p.m. Eastern Time on Monday, December 4, 2006.

    Docket Numbers: ER07-208-000.
    Applicants: Entergy Services Inc.
    Description: Entergy Services, Inc., on behalf Energy Arkansas,
Inc., et al., submits notice of cancellation which proposes to
terminate the January 1, 1987 Contract for Purchases of Economic Energy
etc., under ER07-208.
    Filed Date: 11/13/2006.
    Accession Number: 20061116-0034.
    Comment Date: 5 p.m. Eastern Time on Monday, December 4, 2006.

    Docket Numbers: ER07-209-000.
    Applicants: Avista Corporation.
    Description: Avista Corporation submits an Amended and Restated
Power Transfer Agreement conformed to comply with Rule 614 with Public
Utility District 2 of Grant County pursuant to Section 35.12 of FERC's
Regulations under ER07-209 et al.
    Filed Date: 11/13/2006.
    Accession Number: 20061116-0033.
    Comment Date: 5 p.m. Eastern Time on Monday, December 4, 2006.

    Docket Numbers: ER07-210-000.
    Applicants: Northeast Utilities.
    Description: Northeast Utilities Service Co., on behalf of the
Connecticut Light and Power Co., submits a Notice of Termination to
cancel First Revised Rate Schedule FERC 554 under ER07-210.
    Filed Date: 11/13/2006.
    Accession Number: 20061116-0083.
    Comment Date: 5 p.m. Eastern Time on Monday, December 4, 2006.

    Docket Numbers: ER07-212-000; ER01-1558-004.
    Applicants: Wayzata California Power Holdings, LLC; NEO California
Power LLC.
    Description: Notice of Non-Material Change in Status, Notice of
Succession, and request for expedited review of NEO California Power,
LLC and Wayzata California Power Holdings, LLC under ER01-1588 et al.
    Filed Date: 11/13/2006.
    Accession Number: 20061116-0088.
    Comment Date: 5 p.m. Eastern Time on Monday, December 4, 2006.

    Docket Numbers: ER07-213-000; ER07-214-000; ER07-215-000; ER07-216-
000; ER07-217-000; ER07-218-000.
    Applicants: Nordic Marketing of Massachusetts, L.L.C.; Nordic
Marketing of New Jersey, LLC; Nordic Marketing of New York, LLC; Nordic
Electric LLC; Nordic Energy Barge 1, L.L.C.; Nordic Energy Barge 2,
L.L.C.
    Description: Nordic Marketing of Massachusetts, LLC, et al.,
submits Second Revised Sheet 1, et al., to FERC Rate Schedule 1 etc.,
under ER07-213 et al.
    Filed Date: 11/14/2006.
    Accession Number: 20061116-0090.
    Comment Date: 5 p.m. Eastern Time on Tuesday, December 5, 2006.

    Docket Numbers: ER07-219-000.
    Applicants: ISO New England Inc.
    Description: ISO New England Inc., and New England Power Pool
Participants Committee submits Market Rule changes to eliminate the
Peaking Unit Safe Harbor mechanism under ER07-219.
    Filed Date: 11/14/2006.
    Accession Number: 20061116-0091.
    Comment Date: 5 p.m. Eastern Time on Tuesday, December 5, 2006.

    Take notice that the Commission received the following electric
securities filings:

    Docket Numbers: ES07-8-000.
    Applicants: PSEG Nuclear LLC.
    Description: Application of PSEG Energy Resources & Trade LLC, et
al., for Authorization to Guarantee Securities under ES07-8.
    Filed Date: 11/09/2006.
    Accession Number: 20061109-5019.
    Comment Date: 5 p.m. Eastern Time on Thursday, November 30, 2006.

    Any person desiring to intervene or to protest in any of the above
proceedings must file in accordance with Rules 211 and 214 of the
Commission's Rules of Practice and Procedure (18 CFR 385.211 and
385.214) on or before 5 p.m. Eastern time on the specified comment
date. It is not necessary to separately intervene again in a subdocket
related to a compliance filing if you have previously intervened in the
same docket. Protests will be considered by the Commission in
determining the appropriate action to be taken, but will not serve to
make protestants parties to the proceeding. Anyone filing a motion to
intervene or protest must serve a copy of that document on the
Applicant. In reference to filings initiating a new proceeding,
interventions or protests submitted on or before the comment deadline
need not be served on persons other than the Applicant.
    The Commission encourages electronic submission of protests and
interventions in lieu of paper, using the FERC Online links at http://www.ferc.gov.
 To facilitate electronic service, persons with Internet

access who will eFile a document and/or be listed as a contact for an
intervenor must create and validate an eRegistration account using the
eRegistration link. Select the eFiling link to log on and submit the
intervention or protests.
    Persons unable to file electronically should submit an original and
14 copies of the intervention or protest to the Federal Energy
Regulatory Commission, 888 First St. NE., Washington, DC 20426.
    The filings in the above proceedings are accessible in the
Commission's eLibrary system by clicking on the appropriate link in the
above list. They are also available for review in the Commission's
Public Reference Room in Washington, DC. There is an eSubscription link
on the Web site that enables subscribers to receive e-mail notification
when a document is added to a subscribed dockets(s). For assistance
with any FERC Online service, please e-mail<EMAIL_ADDRESS>
or call<PHONE_NUMBER> (toll free). For TTY, call<PHONE_NUMBER>.

Magalie R. Salas,
Secretary.
 [FR Doc. E6-19954 Filed 11-24-06; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 6717-01-P


[Federal Register: March 22, 2010 (Volume 75, Number 54)]
[Notices]
[Page 13629-13632]
[DOCID:fr22mr10-125]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

[Release No. 34-61713; File No. SR-NASDAQ-2010-006)

Self-Regulatory Organizations; The NASDAQ Stock Market LLC; Order
Granting Approval of Proposed Rule Change To Modify the Press Release
Requirements for Listed Companies

March 15, 2010.

I. Introduction

    On January 13, 2010, The NASDAQ Stock Market LLC (``Nasdaq'' or the
``Exchange'') filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission
(``Commission''), pursuant to Section 19(b)(1) of the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934 (``Act''),\1\ and Rule 19b-4 thereunder,\2\ a
proposed rule change to modify certain of Nasdaq's rules pertaining to
its press release requirements for listed companies. The proposed rule
change was published for comment in the Federal Register on February 8,
2010.\3\ The Commission received no comments on the proposed rule
change. This order approves the proposed rule change.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \1\ 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(1)
    \2\ 17 CFR 240.19b-4.
    \3\ See Securities Exchange Act Release No. 61461 (February 1,
2010), 75 FR 6241 (``Notice'').
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

II. Description of Proposed Rule Change

    Nasdaq is proposing to modify certain of its rules related to the
issuer compliance process that currently require a company to disclose
information in a press release or through the news media. Nasdaq notes
that these rules were generally adopted to address inconsistent issuer
disclosure practices and reflected the view that issuing a press
release was the only way to assure wide dissemination of an important
event. However, in 2002, the Commission adopted Regulation FD,\4\ and
Nasdaq amended its rules to allow listed companies to provide
disclosure of material news via any Regulation FD compliant means.\5\
Nasdaq asserts that there is now broad acceptance of Regulation FD
compliant methods of disclosure, such as through the use of a Form 8-K.
Additionally, Nasdaq argues that its requirements in some instances are
duplicative of the Form 8-K requirements, and notes that Form 8-K
disclosures are readily available to investors and the information
contained in them is widely reported on by the news media. As such,
Nasdaq is proposing to modify certain of its rules, as described below,
to permit disclosure either through a press release or by filing a Form
8-K where required by Commission rules.\6\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \4\ 17 CFR 243.100-103.
    \5\ See Securities Exchange Act Release No. 46901 (November 25,
2002), 67 FR 72011 (December 3, 2002).
    \6\ The Commission notes that Nasdaq is not proposing any change
to Rule 5840(j), regarding the voluntary delisting of a company,
because the press release requirement in that rule is required by
Exchange Act Rule 12d2-2(c); 17 CFR 240.12d2-2(c). Nasdaq is also
maintaining the requirements in Rule 5635(c)(4) and IM-5365-1, which
require that a company relying on the inducement exception to the
requirement to obtain shareholder approval for equity compensation
awards must ``disclose in a press release'' specific information
about the equity award. Finally, as noted above, late filers will
still be required to issue a press release. See Rule 5250(b)(2) and
Rule 5810(b).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    First, Nasdaq proposes to amend Rules 5250(b)(3), 5810(b), 5840(k)
and IM-5810-1, which require disclosure of notifications from Nasdaq
staff or an Adjudicatory Body \7\ regarding a company's compliance with
the listing standards. Rules 5250(b)(3) and 5810(b) require a company
to ``make a public announcement through the news media'' \8\ disclosing
the receipt of a notice that the company does not meet a listing
standard, that staff has determined to delist the company, or that the
company has received a Public Reprimand Letter. IM-5810-1 provides the
time frame for companies to make these disclosures and describes the
consequences of failing to do so. Rule 5840(k) requires that a company
that receives a Public Reprimand Letter from an Adjudicatory Body must
make ``a public announcement through the news media'' disclosing
receipt of that letter. Nasdaq proposes to modify these rules to allow
the company, in each case, to make a public announcement by ``filing a
Form 8-K, where required by SEC rules, or by issuing a press release.''
\9\ However, Nasdaq proposes that a company that is late in filing a
required periodic report with the Commission would still be required to
issue a press release announcing that it has received notice that it
does not meet that requirement, and would not be permitted to fulfill
this requirement by only filing a Form 8-K. Nasdaq also proposes to
clarify in each of these rules that notification of these disclosures
should be made to the Nasdaq MarketWatch Department through

Nasdaq's electronic disclosure submission system at least ten minutes
prior to the notification to the public.\10\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \7\ Rule 5805(a) defines an ``Adjudicatory Body'' as the
Hearings Panel, the Nasdaq Listing and Hearing Review Council, or
the Nasdaq Board, or a member thereof.
    \8\ Nasdaq interprets the requirement to disclose information
through the news media to be satisfied by the issuance of a press
release.
    \9\ The Commission notes that under Item 3.01 of Form 8-K, a
company is required to file a Form 8-K when it receives notice from
Nasdaq that the company does not satisfy a listing standard or when
Nasdaq issues a Public Reprimand Letter to the company.
    \10\ The Commission notes that Nasdaq recently changed its rules
to provide that if the public release of material information is
made outside of Nasdaq market hours, companies must notify
MarketWatch of the material information prior to 6:50 a.m. ET. See
Securities Exchange Act Release No. 61521 (February 16, 2010), 75 FR
8156 (February 23, 2010). The Exchange has represented that once
this proposed rule change (SR-NASDAQ-2010-006) is approved by the
Commission, it will file a separate filing pursuant to Section 19(b)
of the Act to make corresponding changes to the rule provisions
adopted in this filing to reflect the previously adopted changes.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    Second, Nasdaq proposes to modify Rule 5635(f), which requires a
company to ``make a public announcement through the news media'' when
it receives an exception to the shareholder approval requirements
because compliance would jeopardize the company's financial viability.
Nasdaq proposes instead to allow companies to make this announcement
``by filing a Form 8-K, where required by SEC rules, or by issuing a
press release.'' Nasdaq is retaining its current requirement that
companies that receive an exemption are also required to mail this
notice to all shareholders at least ten days before issuing securities
in reliance on the exception.
    Third, Nasdaq proposes to revise Rule 5225(a)(3), which requires a
company to ``publicize through, at a minimum, a public announcement
through the news media'' any change in the terms of a listed unit.
Nasdaq proposes to modify this rule to allow the company to ``make a
public announcement by filing a Form 8-K, where required by SEC rules,
or by issuing a press release'' of any change in the terms of the unit.
    Nasdaq is also proposing to make a number of other modifications to
its rules requiring public disclosure through press releases. In
particular, Nasdaq proposes to amend Rule 5250(c)(2), which requires a
company that is a foreign private issuer to disclose interim financial
results ``in a press release and on a Form 6-K.'' Nasdaq proposes to
eliminate the requirement that this information be published in a press
release, while maintaining the requirement that it be on a Form 6-K. A
foreign private issuer would still be free to disclose this information
in a press release if it chooses.
    Nasdaq also proposes to eliminate the requirement contained in Rule
5250(b)(2) that a company must issue a press release announcing the
receipt of an audit opinion that expresses doubt about the ability of
the company to continue as a going concern. Nasdaq argues that this
requirement, which was adopted in 2003,\11\ is duplicative of
disclosure already provided in the Company's annual filing with the
Commission, which must be made available to all shareholders under
Nasdaq rules, and which must be distributed to shareholders under the
Commission's Proxy Rules. Nasdaq noted in its Notice, however, that if
a company fails to include the audit opinion in its annual filing,
Nasdaq would consider the filing deficient and would move to delist the
company on that basis.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \11\ See Securities Exchange Act Release No. 48745 (November 4,
2003), 68 FR 64154 (November 12, 2003).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    In addition, Nasdaq proposes to revise Rules 5810(b) and 5840(k),
which require companies to notify multiple Nasdaq departments before
they issue certain disclosures.\12\ Nasdaq proposes to modify these
rules to require companies to provide these disclosures to the
MarketWatch Department using the electronic disclosure submission
system accessible at http://www.nasdaq.net.\13\ Nasdaq noted that
MarketWatch will notify other Nasdaq departments when necessary.\14\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \12\ Under these rules, a company must notify the MarketWatch,
Listing Qualifications, and Hearings Departments.
    \13\ Companies are already required to use the electronic
disclosure submission service to notify MarketWatch prior to the
distribution of material news. See Rule 5250(b)(1) and IM-5250-1.
See also Exchange Act Release No. 55856 (June 4, 2007), 72 FR 32383
(June 12, 2007).
    \14\ Nasdaq also proposes to: (i) Add a title to Rule 5250(b)(1)
to clarify the text; and (ii) use capitalization for a defined term
in Rule 5615. The Commission notes that these are non-substantive
changes.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

III. Discussion

    After careful review, the Commission finds that the proposed rule
change is consistent with the requirements of the Act and the rules and
regulations thereunder applicable to a national securities exchange
and, in particular, with Section 6(b)(5) of the Act,\15\ which
requires, among other things, that the rules of a national securities
exchange be designed to prevent fraudulent and manipulative acts and
practices, to promote just and equitable principles of trade, to remove
impediments to, and perfect the mechanism of, a free and open market
and a national market system and, in general, to protect investors and
the public interest.\16\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \15\ 15 U.S.C. 78f(b)(5).
    \16\ In approving this proposed rule change, the Commission has
considered the proposed rule's impact on efficiency, competition,
and capital formation. See 15 U.S.C. 78c(f).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    The Commission notes that full and fair disclosure of information
by issuers of securities to the public is of critical importance to
financial markets and the investing public. As such, the Commission
believes that exchange compliance standards requiring a company to
disclose information should be designed to provide broad public access
to such information. As discussed below, the Commission believes that
Nasdaq's proposal to modify certain of its rules pertaining to its
press release requirements for listed companies will eliminate
duplicative requirements from Nasdaq's disclosure rules in certain
situations where a company is already required by Commission rules to
file a Form 8-K, while still ensuring that issuers disseminate material
information to the public in a broad and inclusive manner.
    In 2000, the Commission adopted Regulation FD to curtail the
selective disclosure of material non-public information by issuers to
analysts and institutional investors.\17\ Regulation FD provides that
public disclosure by issuers can be made by filing a Form 8-K with the
Commission or through another method (or combination of methods) of
disclosure that is reasonably designed to provide broad, non-
exclusionary distribution of information to the public.\18\ The
Commission is cognizant, in reviewing Nasdaq's proposal, that in
approving Regulation FD, the Commission specifically noted that it was
not intended to alter or supplement self-regulatory organization rules
that typically require companies to issue a press release to announce
material developments.\19\ Despite this, the Commission believes that,
in many instances, the filing of a Form 8-K provides an effective,
broad, and non-exclusionary means of distributing material disclosures.
The Commission notes that the information required to be reported on a
Form 8-K is material information that could impact an investor's
decision to buy, sell or hold a security. For this reason, the Form 8-K
is made easily obtainable by investors on the Commission's EDGAR Web
site, as well as many major financial web sites, and the information it
provides is also commonly reported by the news media. The Commission
also believes that the public has become more familiar with the Form 8-
K method of dissemination since the original adoption of Regulation FD.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \17\ See Securities Exchange Act Release No. 43154 (August 15,
2000), 65 FR 51716 (August 24, 2000) (``Regulation FD Adopting
Release'').
    \18\ See Regulation FD, 17 CFR 243.100-103.
    \19\ See Regulation FD Adopting Release, supra note 17 at n.70.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    The Commission notes that since investors have broad access to the

information provided by the Form 8-K, in certain instances where a
company is required to file a Form 8-K pursuant to Commission rules as
well as issue a press release under Nasdaq rules, the information
provided may overlap, resulting in duplicate disclosures of the same
information. Although the Commission would prefer to ensure that
investors have as many channels as possible to receive material
disclosures, in these particular situations, the Commission recognizes
that requiring both a Form 8-K and a press release may be unnecessary
and may place an additional burden on issuers while providing no
additional significant benefit to investors. The Commission notes,
however, that while it believes that it is appropriate to eliminate the
requirement to make these duplicate disclosures, in certain situations
it continues to believe that there are benefits to the market and
investors to issuing a press release when disclosing material
information that issuers should consider.\20\ Thus, a company would, of
course, be permitted to issue a press release in addition to their
filing of a required Form 8-K.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \20\ See Regulation FD Adopting Release, supra note 17.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    The Commission also notes that, in those cases where a Form 8-K is
not required to be filed under Commission rules, under its proposal,
Nasdaq rules will still require an issuer to make public disclosures
through a press release. We believe these requirements adequately
balance the situation where investors, the public and the press have an
expectation to find information about a company in a Form 8-K, since
the information is required to be filed with the Commission in that
format, with the need to provide adequate disclosure to the public
through a press release on other matters as required under Nasdaq
rules.\21\ For the aforementioned reasons, the Commission believes that
Nasdaq's proposal to modify certain of its rules to permit disclosure
either through a press release or by filing a Form 8-K where required
by Commission rules is reasonable and consistent with the Act.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \21\ The Commission would generally be concerned if, on matters
not required under Commission rules to be filed on Form 8-K, Nasdaq
rules required such matters to be disclosed in that format because
such Form 8-K filings would become a requirement through Nasdaq
rules, even though the requirement had not been adopted by the
Commission.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    In particular, the Commission believes that Nasdaq's proposed
changes to Rules 5250(b)(3), 5810(b), 5840(k) and IM-5810-1--requiring
disclosure of notifications regarding a company's compliance with
listing standards--to allow the company, in each case, to make a public
announcement by ``filing a Form 8-K, where required by SEC rules, or by
issuing a press release,'' are examples where the filing of a single
Form 8-K is an appropriate alternative to requiring both a Form 8-K and
a press release. The Commission notes that Item 3.01 of Form 8-K would
require a company to file a Form 8-K when it receives notice that the
company does not satisfy a listing standard or when Nasdaq issues a
Public Reprimand Letter to the company. The Commission believes that
the Form 8-K, in these instances, addresses the Commission's material
disclosure concerns for investors, as investors could easily obtain the
information in the Form 8-K and the information may likely result in
media coverage. In addition, the Commission notes that Nasdaq is not
proposing that this change will be applicable to its late filer rules
and instead will continue to require that a company that is late in
filing a required periodic report with the Commission must issue a
press release, even though they are also required to file a Form 8-K,
which is consistent with the Commission's current treatment of late
filers.\22\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \22\ See NYSE Rule 802.01E.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    Similarly, the Commission believes that Nasdaq's proposal to permit
either the filing of a Form 8-K where required by SEC rules or the
issuance of a press release when a company receives an exception to the
shareholder approval requirements because compliance would jeopardize
the company's financial viability is appropriate and consistent with
the Act. The Commission notes that, in addition to the Form 8-K or a
press release, Nasdaq will continue to require that notice be provided
to shareholders by mail at least ten days before issuing securities in
reliance on this exception.
    Finally, the Commission believes that Nasdaq's proposal to allow
the filing of a Form 8-K where required by Commission rules in lieu of
issuing a press release where there is any change in the terms of a
unit is another instance where the duplicate disclosure is unnecessary
and an extra burden on listed companies. As such, the Commission
believes that this proposed rule change is appropriate and consistent
with the Act.
    As noted above, Nasdaq also proposes several other changes to its
rules pertaining to its press release requirements for listed
companies. First, Nasdaq proposes to modify Rule 5250(c)(2) to require
a company that is a foreign private issuer to disclose interim
financial results on a Form 6-K, instead of both a Form 6-K and a press
release as required under current Nasdaq rules. The Commission believes
that this change also adequately addresses the Commission's investor
protection concerns regarding broad availability of disclosure of
material information and is consistent with the Act. The Commission
notes that pursuant to Regulation FD, foreign companies are permitted
to meet the requirements of Regulation FD by making filings on Form 6-
K, rather than on a Form 8-K. Like the Form 8-K, the Form 6-K provides
material disclosures and, similarly, is widely available and utilized
by investors, as it is also accessible on the Commission's EDGAR Web
site and its contents may be widely reported in the news media. While
foreign companies will now be required to only file a Form 6-K to meet
Nasdaq's disclosure requirement for interim reports, Nasdaq notes in
its filing that foreign issuers would still be free to disclose this
information in a press release, in addition to the filing of a Form 6-
K, if it chooses.
    In addition, Nasdaq proposes to eliminate the requirement from Rule
5250(b)(2), that a company must issue a press release announcing the
receipt of an audit opinion expressing doubt about the ability of the
company to continue as a going concern. The Commission notes that the
audit opinion is required to be provided in a company's annual filing
with the Commission, which must also be distributed to shareholders
under the Commission's Proxy Rules,\23\ and must be made available to
all shareholders under the Nasdaq rules. Although the Commission
understands that a negative audit opinion constitutes important
material information that could impact an investor's decision to buy,
sell or hold a security, the Commission, after careful consideration,
also believes that publication of this opinion in the annual filing,
which the Commission already requires to be distributed to all
shareholders, should provide broad notice to investors. Additionally,
if a company fails to include the audit opinion in its annual filing,
the Commission notes that Nasdaq would consider the filing deficient
and would move to delist the company on that basis, recognizing the
importance of the audit opinion disclosure to investors.\24\
Accordingly,

the Commission believes that this change will eliminate unnecessary
duplicate disclosures, while continuing to provide investors with
sufficient notice of such material information.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \23\ 17 CFR 240.14a-1. See Item 13 of Schedule 14A, 17 CFR
240.14a-101.
    \24\ Nasdaq is also proposing to make a conforming change to
Rule 5615(a)(3) to eliminate the reference to the going concern
requirement because it will no longer apply. In addition, Nasdaq is
proposing to remove the reference in Rule 5615(a)(3) to the
requirement for a foreign private issuer to enter into a listing
agreement because there is no need to single out this requirement
from all the others of the requirements of the Rule 5000 Series to
which a foreign private issuer is subject.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    Finally, Nasdaq proposes to eliminate the requirements in Rule
5810(b) and 5840(k) that companies must notify multiple Nasdaq
departments before issuing certain disclosures. The Commission is
satisfied that Nasdaq's proposed changes will continue to provide for
adequate notification to the MarketWatch Department, as well as other
departments,\25\ since Nasdaq has represented that the MarketWatch
Department will notify other Nasdaq departments of the disclosures when
necessary.\26\ As such, the Commission believes that Nasdaq's
notification procedures will be streamlined, eliminating unnecessary
duplicative notification requirements for listed companies, while still
ensuring that the necessary departments will be notified by the
MarketWatch Department if necessary for regulatory or other reasons.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \25\ Companies are already required to use the electronic
disclosure submission service to notify MarketWatch prior to the
distribution of material news. See Rule 5250(b)(1) and IM-5250-1.
See also Securities Exchange Act Release No. 55856 (June 4, 2007),
72 FR 32383 (June 12, 2007) (approving SR-NASDAQ-2007-029).
    \26\ Nasdaq is also proposing: (i) To add a title to Rule
5250(b)(1) to clarify the text; and (ii) to use capitalization for a
defined term in Rule 5615. These are non-substantive changes.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    For the reasons noted above, the Commission believes that the
proposed rule change is consistent with Section 6(b)(5) of the Act,\27\
and will, among other things, protect investors and the public interest
by assuring that the investing public has broad and easy access to full
disclosure of corporate matters. As discussed above, the Commission
believes that the changes proposed by Nasdaq will continue to require
issuers to disseminate necessary information to the public in a broad
and inclusive manner, while at the same time minimizing duplicative
disclosures.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \27\ 15 U.S.C. 78f(b)(5).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

IV. Conclusion

    It is therefore ordered, pursuant to Section 19(b)(2) of the
Act,\28\ that the proposed rule change (SR-NASDAQ-2010-006) be, and it
hereby is, approved.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \28\ 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(2).

    For the Commission, by the Division of Trading and Markets,
pursuant to delegated authority.\29\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \29\ 17 CFR 200.30-3(a)(12).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

Florence E. Harmon,
Deputy Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2010-6182 Filed 3-19-10; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 8011-01-P


[Federal Register Volume 81, Number 202 (Wednesday, October 19, 2016)]
[Notices]
[Pages 72147-72148]
[FR Doc No: 2016-25286]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION

Federal Aviation Administration

Notice of Request To Release Airport Property

AGENCY: Federal Aviation Administration (FAA), DOT.

ACTION: Notice of Intent To Rule on Request To Release Airport Property
at Waterloo Regional Airport, Waterloo, Iowa. (ALO)

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The FAA proposes to rule and invites public comment on the
release of land at Waterloo Regional Airport, Waterloo, Iowa, under the
provisions of 49 U.S.C. 47107(h)(2).

DATES: Comments must be received on or before November 18, 2016.

ADDRESSES: Comments on this application may be mailed or delivered to
the FAA at the following address: Lynn D. Martin, Airports Compliance
Specialist, Federal Aviation Administration, Airports Division, ACE-
610C, 901 Locust Room 364, Kansas City, MO 64106.
    In addition, one copy of any comments submitted to the FAA must be
mailed or delivered to: Keith Kaspari, Director of Aviation, 2790
Livingston Ln., Waterloo, IA 50703,<PHONE_NUMBER>

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Lynn D. Martin, Airports Compliance
Specialist, Federal Aviation Administration, Airports Division, ACE-
610C, 901 Locust Room 364, Kansas City, MO 64106,<PHONE_NUMBER>,
<EMAIL_ADDRESS>The request to release property may be reviewed,
by appointment, in person at this same location.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The FAA invites public comment on the
request to release approximately 12.33+ acres of airport property at
Waterloo Regional Airport (ALO) under the provisions of 49 U.S.C.
47107(h)(2). On March 29, 2016, the Director of Aviation at Waterloo
Regional Airport requested from the FAA that approximately 12.33+ acres
of property be released for sale to Dahlstrom Development for
industrial/business development consistent with the zoning ordinances
of the City. On October 6, 2016, the FAA determined that the request to
release property at Waterloo Regional Airport (ALO) submitted by the
Sponsor meets the procedural requirements of the Federal Aviation
Administration and the release of the property does not and will not
impact future aviation needs at the airport. The FAA may approve the
request, in whole or in part, no sooner than thirty days after the
publication of this notice.
    The following is a brief overview of the request:
    The Waterloo Regional Airport (ALO) is proposing the release of
airport property totaling 12.33 acres, more or less. This land is to be
used for industrial/business development to Dahlstrom Development. The
release of land is necessary to comply with Federal Aviation
Administration Grant Assurances that do not allow federally acquired
airport property to be used for non-aviation purposes. The sale of the
subject property will result in the land at Waterloo Regional Airport
(ALO) being changed from aeronautical to non-aeronautical use and
release the lands from the conditions of the Airport Improvement
Program Grant Agreement Grant Assurances. In accordance with 49 U.S.C.
47107(c)(2)(B)(i) and (iii), the airport will receive fair market value
for the property, which will be subsequently reinvested in another
eligible airport improvement project for general aviation facilities at
Waterloo Regional Airport.
    Any person may inspect, by appointment, the request in person at
the FAA office listed above under FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT. In
addition, any person may, upon appointment and request, inspect the
application, notice and other documents determined by the FAA to be
related to the application in person at Waterloo Regional Airport.

    Issued in Kansas City, MO on October 13, 2016.
Jim A. Johnson,
Manager, Airports Division.
[FR Doc. 2016-25286 Filed 10-18-16; 8:45 am]
 BILLING CODE 4910-13-P


From:  Self, Traci I<EMAIL_ADDRESS>Sent: Thursday, June 9, 2016 3:47:10 PM To:  Jones, DonnaLee; French, Chuck Cc: Zavoda, Rich; Shelton, Randy E; Hill, John R; Self, Traci I Subject:  ArcelorMittal Monessen Prior Site Source Test Reports 2014-2016 for USEPA CAA Section 114

Dr. Jones:

The following files are attached for the USEPA CAA Section 114 Information Collection Request:

The report links below will open pdf files for deliverables for Prior Site Source Test Reports:

ArcelorMittal Monessen Compliance Test Report 14-261<https://avogadrogroup-my.sharepoint.com/personal/mhuffman_montrose-env_com/_layouts/15/guestaccess.aspx?guestaccesstoken=C9E3keb2Zy05XfkM0UQMTGoxFYs0dZX8o3XxlAdT53o%3d&docid=04626db32298e402e826d3540631bb029>

ArcelorMittal Monessen Combustion Stacks 1B and 2 and Tampella Boilers Compliance Report 15-253<https://avogadrogroup-my.sharepoint.com/personal/mhuffman_montrose-env_com/_layouts/15/guestaccess.aspx?guestaccesstoken=QZ7jhdt%2focMnC803HvheHmQT6m8bZoEAbwEuBpXT2xc%3d&docid=0fbc82455f8f7452aa2703329d98959bf>

ArcelorMittal Monessen EPA Section 114 Request Emissions Test Report 16-051<https://avogadrogroup-my.sharepoint.com/personal/mhuffman_montrose-env_com/_layouts/15/guestaccess.aspx?guestaccesstoken=4AVvPDgqBE1mPF3Od0GG4y8l4wjU0o%2bZ2TLdlW6I7wo%3d&docid=0192bc32dc6a34085859e09b8d78b8f77>

If there is any problem with the links please contact me.  Thank you.

Traci I. Self | Environmental Manager ArcelorMittal Monessen LLC

Monessen Coke Plant | 345 Donner Ave Monessen, PA 15062

T +1<PHONE_NUMBER> | F +1<PHONE_NUMBER> | traci.self<EMAIL_ADDRESS>

<< AMMonessen Coke ICR PreviousTest Report Submittal Cover Letter 6 9 16.pdf >>


[Federal Register Volume 76, Number 247 (Friday, December 23, 2011)]
[Notices]
[Pages 80422-80423]
[FR Doc No: 2011-32917]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

Submission for OMB Review; Comment Request

Upon Written Request, Copies Available From: U.S. Securities and
Exchange Commission, Office of Investor Education and Advocacy,
Washington, DC 20549-0213.

Extension:
    Rule 15c1-7, SEC File No. 270-146, OMB Control No. 3235-0134.

    Notice is hereby given that pursuant to the Paperwork Reduction Act
of 1995 (``PRA'')(44 U.S.C. 3501 et seq.) the Securities and Exchange
Commission (``Commission'') has submitted to the Office of Management
and Budget (``OMB'') a request for approval of extension of the
existing collection of information provided for in the following rule:
Rule 15c1-7 (17 CFR 240.15c1-7) under the Securities Exchange Act of
1934 (15 U.S.C. 78a et seq.) (``Exchange Act'').
    Rule 15c1-7 states that any act of a broker-dealer designed to
effect securities transactions with or for a customer account over
which the broker-dealer (directly or through an agent or employee) has
discretion will be considered a fraudulent, manipulative, or deceptive
practice under the federal securities laws, unless a record is made of
the transaction immediately by the broker-dealer. The record must
include (a) the name of the customer, (b) the name, amount, and price
of the security, and (c) the date and time when such transaction took
place. The Commission estimates that 481 respondents collect
information related to approximately 400,000 transactions annually
under Rule 15c1-7 and that each respondent would spend approximately 5
minutes on the collection of information for each transaction, for
approximately 33,333 aggregate hours per year (approximately 69 hours
per respondent).
    The Commission may not conduct or sponsor a collection of
information unless it displays a current valid control number. No
person shall be subject to any penalty for failing to comply with a
collection of information subject to PRA that does not display a valid
Office of Management and Budget (OMB) control number.
    The public may view the background documentation for this
information collection at the following Web site, www.reginfo.gov.
Comments should be directed to: (i) Desk Officer for the Securities and
Exchange Commission, Office of Information and Regulatory Affairs,
Office of Management and Budget, Room 10102, New Executive Office
Building, Washington, DC 20503 or by sending an email to<EMAIL_ADDRESS>and (ii) Thomas Bayer, Director/Chief Information
Officer, Securities and Exchange Commission, c/o Remi Pavlik-Simon,
6432 General Green Way, Alexandria, VA 22312 or send an email to<EMAIL_ADDRESS>Comments must be submitted within 30 days of this
notice.

    Dated: December 19, 2011.
Kevin M. O'Neill,
Deputy Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2011-32917 Filed 12-22-11; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 8011-01-P