[Federal Register Volume 88, Number 33 (Friday, February 17, 2023)]
[Proposed Rules]
[Pages 10246-10248]
[FR Doc No: 2023-03422]

=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY

Coast Guard

33 CFR Part 165

[Docket Number USCG-2023-0081]
RIN 1625-AA00

Safety Zone: Tall Ships America; Tampa Bay, St Petersburg, FL

AGENCY: Coast Guard, DHS.

ACTION: Notice of proposed rulemaking.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Coast Guard is establishing a temporary moving safety zone
on the waters of Tampa Bay, around a Tall Ships America Parade of sail
in St Petersburg, Florida. The safety zone will extend 100 yards from
the beam of the ships as they transit from the muster point in
approximate position 27[deg]43.54' N 082[deg]36.38' W to the moorings
at Port St Pete, St Petersburg, FL in approximate position
27[deg]45.34' N 082[deg]37.15' W. The safety Zone is necessary to
protect the public, wooden sailing vessels and their crews from the
hazards associated with transiting the area. Persons and vessels are
prohibited from entering, transiting through, anchoring in, or
remaining within the safety zone unless authorized by the Captain of
the Port St. Petersburg or a designated representative.We invite your
comments on this proposed rulemaking.

DATES: Comments and related material must be received by the Coast
Guard on or before March 6, 2023.

ADDRESSES: You may submit comments identified by docket number USCG-
2023-0081 using the Federal Decision Making Portal at https://www.regulations.gov. See the ``Public Participation and Request for
Comments'' portion of the SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION section for further
instructions on submitting comments.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: If you have questions about this
proposed rulemaking, call or email Marine Science Technician First
Class Regina L Cuevas, Sector St. Petersburg Prevention Department,
Coast Guard; telephone<PHONE_NUMBER>, email [email protected].

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

I. Table of Abbreviations

CFR Code of Federal Regulations
DHS Department of Homeland Security
FR Federal Register
NPRM Notice of proposed rulemaking
Sec.  Section
U.S.C. United States Code

II. Background, Purpose, and Legal Basis

    On March 30, 2023, Tall Ships America will be visiting the Port of
St Pete in St Petersburg, FL. The Coast Guard is establishing a
temporary moving safety zone on the waters of Tampa Bay, around the
Tall Ships America Parade of sail in St Petersburg, Florida on March
30, 2023. The safety zone will extend 100 yards from the beam of the
ships as they transit from the muster point in approximate position
27[deg]43.54' N 082[deg]36.38' W to the moorings at Port St Pete, St
Petersburg, FL in approximate position 27[deg]45.34' N 082[deg]37.15'
W. The safety Zone is necessary to protect the public, wooden sailing
vessels and their crews from the hazards associated with transiting the
area. Persons and vessels are prohibited from entering, transiting
through, anchoring in, or remaining within the safety zone unless
authorized by the Captain of the Port St. Petersburg or a designated
representative.
    The purpose of this rulemaking is to ensure the safety of vessels
and the navigable waters within a 100-yard radius of the Tall Ships
America vessels. The Coast Guard is proposing this rulemaking under
authority in 46 U.S.C. 70034.

III. Discussion of Proposed Rule

    The COTP is proposing to establish a moving safety zone from 1:30
p.m. to 5:30 p.m. on March 30, 2023. The duration of the zone is
intended to ensure the safety of vessels and their crews in these
navigable waters of

Tampa Bay during this event. No vessel or person would be permitted to
enter the safety zone without obtaining permission from the COTP or a
designated representative. The regulatory text we are proposing appears
at the end of this document.

IV. Regulatory Analyses

    We developed this proposed rule after considering numerous statutes
and Executive orders related to rulemaking. Below we summarize our
analyses based on a number of these statutes and Executive orders, and
we discuss First Amendment rights of protestors.

A. Regulatory Planning and Review

    Executive Orders 12866 and 13563 direct agencies to assess the
costs and benefits of available regulatory alternatives and, if
regulation is necessary, to select regulatory approaches that maximize
net benefits. This NPRM has not been designated a ``significant
regulatory action,'' under Executive Order 12866. Accordingly, the NPRM
has not been reviewed by the Office of Management and Budget (OMB).
    This regulatory action determination is based on the size,
location, duration, and time-of-day of the safety zone. Vessel traffic
would be able to safely transit around this safety zone which would
impact a small designated area of Tampa Bay for the Parade route and
Port St Pete which is already designated as a restricted area. Vessel
traffic is normally low during this time of day, and once moored the
Vesssels will not be impeading the waterway. Moreover, the Coast Guard
would issue a Broadcast Notice to Mariners via VHF-FM marine channel 16
about the zone, and the rule would allow vessels to seek permission to
enter the zone.

B. Impact on Small Entities

    The Regulatory Flexibility Act of 1980, 5 U.S.C. 601-612, as
amended, requires Federal agencies to consider the potential impact of
regulations on small entities during rulemaking. The term ``small
entities'' comprises small businesses, not-for-profit organizations
that are independently owned and operated and are not dominant in their
fields, and governmental jurisdictions with populations of less than
50,000. The Coast Guard certifies under 5 U.S.C. 605(b) that this
proposed rule would not have a significant economic impact on a
substantial number of small entities.
    While some owners or operators of vessels intending to transit the
safety zone may be small entities, for the reasons stated in section
IV.A above, this proposed rule would not have a significant economic
impact on any vessel owner or operator.
    If you think that your business, organization, or governmental
jurisdiction qualifies as a small entity and that this proposed rule
would have a significant economic impact on it, please submit a comment
(see ADDRESSES) explaining why you think it qualifies and how and to
what degree this rule would economically affect it.
    Under section 213(a) of the Small Business Regulatory Enforcement
Fairness Act of 1996 (Pub. L. 104-121), we want to assist small
entities in understanding this proposed rule. If the proposed rule
would affect your small business, organization, or governmental
jurisdiction and you have questions concerning its provisions or
options for compliance, please call or email the person listed in the
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT section. The Coast Guard will not
retaliate against small entities that question or complain about this
proposed rule or any policy or action of the Coast Guard.

C. Collection of Information

    This proposed rule would not call for a new collection of
information under the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 (44 U.S.C. 3501-
3520).

D. Federalism and Indian Tribal Governments

    A rule has implications for federalism under Executive Order 13132
(Federalism), if it has a substantial direct effect on the States, on
the relationship between the National Government and the States, or on
the distribution of power and responsibilities among the various levels
of government. We have analyzed this proposed rule under that Order and
have determined that it is consistent with the fundamental federalism
principles and preemption requirements described in Executive Order
13132.
    Also, this proposed rule does not have tribal implications under
Executive Order 13175 (Consultation and Coordination with Indian Tribal
Governments) because it would not have a substantial direct effect on
one or more Indian tribes, on the relationship between the Federal
Government and Indian tribes, or on the distribution of power and
responsibilities between the Federal Government and Indian tribes. If
you believe this proposed rule has implications for federalism or
Indian tribes, please call or email the person listed in the FOR
FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT section.

E. Unfunded Mandates Reform Act

    The Unfunded Mandates Reform Act of 1995 (2 U.S.C. 1531-1538)
requires Federal agencies to assess the effects of their discretionary
regulatory actions. In particular, the Act addresses actions that may
result in the expenditure by a State, local, or tribal government, in
the aggregate, or by the private sector of $100,000,000 (adjusted for
inflation) or more in any one year. Though this proposed rule would not
result in such an expenditure, we do discuss the potential effects of
this proposed rule elsewhere in this preamble.

F. Environment

    We have analyzed this proposed rule under Department of Homeland
Security Directive 023-01, Rev. 1, associated implementing
instructions, and Environmental Planning COMDTINST 5090.1 (series),
which guide the Coast Guard in complying with the National
Environmental Policy Act of 1969 (42 U.S.C. 4321-4370f), and have made
a preliminary determination that this action is one of a category of
actions that do not individually or cumulatively have a significant
effect on the human environment. This proposed rule involves an initial
moving safety zone lasting 4 hours that would prohibit entry within 100
yards of a the Parade of Sail. Normally such actions are categorically
excluded from further review under paragraph L[60a] of Appendix A,
Table 1 of DHS Instruction Manual 023-01-001-01, Rev. 1. A preliminary
Record of Environmental Consideration supporting this determination is
available in the docket. For instructions on locating the docket, see
the ADDRESSES section of this preamble. We seek any comments or
information that may lead to the discovery of a significant
environmental impact from this proposed rule.

G. Protest Activities

    The Coast Guard respects the First Amendment rights of protesters.
Protesters are asked to call or email the person listed in the FOR
FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT section to coordinate protest activities so
that your message can be received without jeopardizing the safety or
security of people, places, or vessels.

V. Public Participation and Request for Comments

    We view public participation as essential to effective rulemaking,
and will consider all comments and material received during the comment
period. Your comment can help shape the outcome of this rulemaking. If
you submit a comment, please include the

docket number for this rulemaking, indicate the specific section of
this document to which each comment applies, and provide a reason for
each suggestion or recommendation.
    Submitting comments. We encourage you to submit comments through
the Federal Decision Making Portal at https://www.regulations.gov. To
do so, go to https://www.regulations.gov, type USCG-2023-0081 in the
search box and click ``Search.'' Next, look for this document in the
Search Results column, and click on it. Then click on the Comment
option. If you cannot submit your material by using https://www.regulations.gov, call or email the person in the FOR FURTHER
INFORMATION CONTACT section of this proposed rule for alternate
instructions.
    Viewing material in docket. To view documents mentioned in this
proposed rule as being available in the docket, find the docket as
described in the previous paragraph, and then select ``Supporting &
Related Material'' in the Document Type column. Public comments will
also be placed in our online docket and can be viewed by following
instructions on the https://www.regulations.gov Frequently Asked
Questions web page. We review all comments received, but we will only
post comments that address the topic of the proposed rule. We may
choose not to post off-topic, inappropriate, or duplicate comments that
we receive.
    Personal information. We accept anonymous comments. Comments we
post to https://www.regulations.gov will include any personal
information you have provided. For more about privacy and submissions
to the docket in response to this document, see DHS's eRulemaking
System of Records notice (85 FR 14226, March 11, 2020).

List of Subjects in 33 CFR Part 165

    Harbors, Marine Safety, Navigation (water), Reporting and
Recordkeeping requirements, Security measures, Waterways.

    For the reasons discussed in the preamble, the Coast Guard is
proposing to amend 33 CFR part 165 as follows:

PART 165--REGULATED NAVIGATION AREAS AND LIMITED ACCESS AREAS

0
1. The authority citation for part 165 continues to read as follows:

    Authority:  46 U.S.C. 70034, 70051, 70124; 33 CFR 1.05-1, 6.04-
1, 6.04-6, and 160.5; Department of Homeland Security Delegation No.
00170.1, Revision No. 01.3.

0
2. Add Sec.  165.T07-0081 to read as follows:

Sec.  165.T07-0081   Safety Zone: Tall Ships America; Tampa Bay, St
Petersburg, FL.

    The Coast Guard is establishing a temporary moving safety zone on
the waters of Tampa Bay, around a Tall ships America Parade of sail in
St Petersburg, Florida on March 30, 2023. The safety zone will extend
100 yards from the beam of the ships as they transit from the muster
point in approximate position 27[deg]43.54' N 082[deg]36.38' W to the
moorings at Port St Pete, St Petersburg, FL in approximate position
27[deg]45.34' N 082[deg]37.15' W. The safety Zone is necessary to
protect the public, wooden sailing vessels and their crews from the
hazards associated with transiting the area. Persons and vessels are
prohibited from entering, transiting through, anchoring in, or
remaining within the safety zone unless authorized by the Captain of
the Port St. Petersburg or a designated representative.

    Dated: February 14, 2023.
Micheal P. Kahle,
Captain, U.S. Coast Guard, Captain of the Port Saint Petersburg.
[FR Doc. 2023-03422 Filed 2-16-23; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 9110-04-P


[Federal Register Volume 76, Number 196 (Tuesday, October 11, 2011)]
[Notices]
[Pages 62794-62795]
[FR Doc No: 2011-26122]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission

Combined Notice of Filings 2

    Take notice that the Commission received the following electric
corporate filings:
    Docket Numbers: EC11-124-000.
    Applicants: Consolidated Edison Company of New York, Inc.
    Description: Application of Consolidated Edison Company of New
York, Inc. for an order pursuant to Section 203 of the Federal Power
Act authorizing the purchase of short-term debt of Orange and Rockland
Utilities, Inc.
    Filed Date: 09/30/2011.
    Accession Number: 20110930-5301.
    Comment Date: 5 p.m. Eastern Time on Friday, October 21, 2011.

    Take notice that the Commission received the following electric
rate filings:

    Docket Numbers: ER11-4048-001.
    Applicants: Gratiot County Wind LLC.
    Description: Gratiot County Wind LLC submits tariff filing per 35:
Compliance Filing of Shared Facilities Agreement to be effective 9/28/
2011.
    Filed Date: 10/03/2011.
    Accession Number: 20111003-5104.
    Comment Date: 5 p.m. Eastern Time on Monday, October 24, 2011.

    Docket Numbers: ER11-4049-001.
    Applicants: Gratiot County Wind II LLC.
    Description: Gratiot County Wind II LLC submits tariff filing per
35: Compliance Filing of Shared Facilities Agreement to be effective 9/
28/2011.
    Filed Date: 10/03/2011.
    Accession Number: 20111003-5105.
    Comment Date: 5 p.m. Eastern Time on Monday, October 24, 2011.

    Docket Numbers: ER12-1-000.
    Applicants: Energy Exchange Direct, LLC.
    Description: Energy Exchange Direct, LLC submits tariff filing per
35.1: Energy Exchange Direct, LLC Electric Tariff Original Volume No 1
to be effective 10/1/2011.
    Filed Date: 10/03/2011.
    Accession Number: 20111003-5003.
    Comment Date: 5 p.m. Eastern Time on Monday, October 24, 2011.

    Docket Numbers: ER12-2-000.
    Applicants: Major Lending, LLC.
    Description: Major Lending, LLC submits tariff filing per 35.1:
Major Lending, LLC Electric Tariff Original Volume No 1 to be effective
10/1/2011.
    Filed Date: 10/03/2011.
    Accession Number: 20111003-5004.

    Comment Date: 5 p.m. Eastern Time on Monday, October 24, 2011.

    Docket Numbers: ER12-3-000.
    Applicants: PJM Interconnection, L.L.C.
    Description: PJM Interconnection, L.L.C. submits tariff filing per
35.13(a)(2)(iii: Queue No. W3-145; Original Service Agreement No. 3064
to be effective 9/1/2011.
    Filed Date: 10/03/2011.
    Accession Number: 20111003-5063.
    Comment Date: 5 p.m. Eastern Time on Monday, October 24, 2011.

    Docket Numbers: ER12-4-000.
    Applicants: PJM Interconnection, L.L.C.
    Description: PJM Interconnection, L.L.C. submits tariff filing per
35.13(a)(2)(iii: Queue No. W3-146; Original Service Agreement No. 3065
to be effective 9/1/2011.
    Filed Date: 10/03/2011.
    Accession Number: 20111003-5081.
    Comment Date: 5 p.m. Eastern Time on Monday, October 24, 2011.

    Docket Numbers: ER12-5-000.
    Applicants: Southwest Power Pool, Inc.
    Description: Southwest Power Pool, Inc. submits tariff filing per
35.13(a)(2)(iii: 1154R6 Associated Electric Cooperative, Inc. NITSA NOA
to be effective 9/1/2011.
    Filed Date: 10/03/2011.
    Accession Number: 20111003-5089.
    Comment Date: 5 p.m. Eastern Time on Monday, October 24, 2011.

    Docket Numbers: ER12-6-000.
    Applicants: FirstEnergy Service Company, American Transmission
Systems, Incorporation.
    Description: Notice of Cancellation of ATSI Service Agreement No.
294 of FirstEnergy Service Company.
    Filed Date: 10/03/2011.
    Accession Number: 20111003-5094.
    Comment Date: 5 p.m. Eastern Time on Monday, October 24, 2011.

    Docket Numbers: ER12-7-000.
    Applicants: ISO New England Inc., New England Power Pool
Participants Committee.
    Description: ISO New England Inc. submits tariff filing per
35.13(a)(2)(iii: Modify Tariff True-Up Provisions to be effective 1/1/
2012.
    Filed Date: 10/03/2011.
    Accession Number: 20111003-5096.
    Comment Date: 5 p.m. Eastern Time on Monday, October 24, 2011.

    Docket Numbers: ER12-8-000.
    Applicants: Invenergy Wind Development Michigan LLC.
    Description: Invenergy Wind Development Michigan LLC submits tariff
filing per 35.1: Compliance Filing of Facilities Use Agreement to be
effective 9/27/2011.
    Filed Date: 10/03/2011.
    Accession Number: 20111003-5103.
    Comment Date: 5 p.m. Eastern Time on Monday, October 24, 2011.

    Docket Numbers: ER12-9-000.
    Applicants: Invenergy Wind Development Michigan LLC.
    Description: Invenergy Wind Development Michigan LLC submits tariff
filing per 35.15: Cancellation of Tariff Identifier 62 to be effective
12/31/9998.
    Filed Date: 10/03/2011.
    Accession Number: 20111003-5106.
    Comment Date: 5 p.m. Eastern Time on Monday, October 24, 2011.

    Docket Numbers: ER12-10-000.
    Applicants: Energy International Power Marketing.
    Description: Energy International Power Marketing submits tariff
filing per 35.1: EI Baseline Tariff to be effective 9/30/2011.
    Filed Date: 10/03/2011.
    Accession Number: 20111003-5140.
    Comment Date: 5 p.m. Eastern Time on Monday, October 24, 2011.

    Take notice that the Commission received the following electric
securities filings:
    Docket Numbers: ES12-1-000.
    Applicants: Northeast Utilities Service Company, The Connecticut
Light and Power Company, Western Massachusetts Electric Company.
    Description: Application of Northeast Utilities Service Company for
The Connecticut Light and Power Company and WMECO Section 204 filing
Form 523.
    Filed Date: 10/03/2011.
    Accession Number: 20111003-5107.
    Comment Date: 5 p.m. Eastern Time on Monday, October 24, 2011.
    The filings are accessible in the Commission's eLibrary system by
clicking on the links or querying the docket number.
    Any person desiring to intervene or protest in any of the above
proceedings must file in accordance with Rules 211 and 214 of the
Commission's Regulations (18 CFR 385.211 and 385.214) on or before 5
p.m. Eastern time on the specified comment date. Protests may be
considered, but intervention is necessary to become a party to the
proceeding.
    eFiling is encouraged. More detailed information relating to filing
requirements, interventions, protests, service, and qualifying
facilities filings can be found at: http://www.ferc.gov/docs-filing/efiling/filing-req.pdf. For other information, call<PHONE_NUMBER>
(toll free). For TTY, call<PHONE_NUMBER>.

    Dated: October 3, 2011.
Nathaniel J. Davis, Sr.,
Deputy Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2011-26122 Filed 10-7-11; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6717-01-P


[Federal Register Volume 81, Number 143 (Tuesday, July 26, 2016)]
[Notices]
[Page 48780]
[FR Doc No: 2016-17519]

=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission

[Docket No. ER16-1649-000]

California Independent System Operator Corporation; Notice
Rescheduling Technical Conference

July 18, 2016.
    The technical conference originally scheduled for September 30,
2016, in the above-referenced proceeding, is hereby rescheduled to
convene on September 16, 2016, at 10:00 a.m. (Eastern Time). It will
occur at the Commission's offices at 888 First Street, NE., Washington,
DC 20426.\1\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \1\ See the Notice of Technical Conference issued on July 14,
2016, for additional details regarding this conference.

    Dated: July 18, 2016.
Kimberly D. Bose,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2016-17519 Filed 7-25-16; 8:45 am]
 BILLING CODE 6717-01-P