[Federal Register Volume 82, Number 75 (Thursday, April 20, 2017)]
[Notices]
[Page 18638]
[FR Doc No: 2017-07973]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission

[Docket No. AC17-83-000]

AEP Texas North Company; AEP Texas Central Company; Notice of
Petition for Waiver

    Take notice that on April 12, 2017, AEP Texas North Company and AEP
Texas Central Company filed a petition for waiver of the requirement to
file a FERC Form 3-Q for the quarter ending March 31, 2017 and
subsequent quarters, as required by 18 CFR 141.400, all as more fully
explained in the petition.
    Any person desiring to intervene or to protest this filing must
file in accordance with Rules 211 and 214 of the Commission's Rules of
Practice and Procedure (18 CFR 385.211, 385.214). Protests will be
considered by the Commission in determining the appropriate action to
be taken, but will not serve to make protestants parties to the
proceeding. Any person wishing to become a party must file a notice of
intervention or motion to intervene, as appropriate. Such notices,
motions, or protests must be filed on or before the comment date.
Anyone filing a motion to intervene or protest must serve a copy of
that document on the Petitioner.
    The Commission encourages electronic submission of protests and
interventions in lieu of paper using the ``eFiling'' link at http://www.ferc.gov. Persons unable to file electronically should submit an
original and 5 copies of the protest or intervention to the Federal
Energy Regulatory Commission, 888 First Street NE., Washington, DC
20426.
    This filing is accessible on-line at http://www.ferc.gov, using the
``eLibrary'' link and is available for review in the Commission's
Public Reference Room in Washington, DC. There is an ``eSubscription''
link on the Web site that enables subscribers to receive email
notification when a document is added to a subscribed docket(s). For
assistance with any FERC Online service, please email
<EMAIL_ADDRESS>or call<PHONE_NUMBER> (toll free). For
TTY, call<PHONE_NUMBER>.
    Comments: 5:00 p.m. Eastern Time on May 4, 2017.

    Dated: April 13, 2017.
Kimberly D. Bose,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2017-07973 Filed 4-19-17; 8:45 am]
 BILLING CODE 6717-01-P


[Federal Register Volume 88, Number 88 (Monday, May 8, 2023)]
[Notices]
[Pages 29769-29771]
[FR Doc No: 2023-09678]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

[Release No. 34-97416; File No. SR-Phlx-2023-14]

Self-Regulatory Organizations; Nasdaq PHLX LLC; Notice of Filing
and Immediate Effectiveness of Proposed Rule Change To Amend Options 7,
Section 4 Regarding Qualified Contingent Cross Growth Tier Rebate

May 2, 2023.
    Pursuant to section 19(b)(1) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934
(``Act''),\1\ and Rule 19b-4 thereunder,\2\ notice is hereby given that
on April 20, 2023, Nasdaq PHLX LLC (``Phlx'' or ``Exchange'') filed
with the Securities and Exchange Commission (``SEC'' or ``Commission'')
the proposed rule change as described in Items I, II, and III, below,
which Items have been prepared by the Exchange. The Commission is
publishing this notice to solicit comments on the proposed rule change
from interested persons.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \1\ 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(1).
    \2\ 17 CFR 240.19b-4.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

I. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement of the Terms of Substance
of the Proposed Rule Change

    The Exchange proposes to amend Phlx's Pricing Schedule at Options
7, Section 4, ``Multiply Listed Options Fees (Includes options
overlying equities, ETFs, ETNs and indexes which are Multiply Listed)
(Excludes SPY).'' \3\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \3\ On April 20, 2023 the Exchange withdrew SR-Phlx-2023-12 and
replaced it with the instant rule change.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    The text of the proposed rule change is available on the Exchange's
website at https://listingcenter.nasdaq.com/rulebook/phlx/rules, at the
principal office of the Exchange, and at the Commission's Public
Reference Room.

II. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement of the Purpose of, and
Statutory Basis for, the Proposed Rule Change

    In its filing with the Commission, the Exchange included statements
concerning the purpose of and basis for the proposed rule change and
discussed any comments it received on the proposed rule change. The
text of these statements may be examined at the places specified in
Item IV below. The Exchange has prepared summaries, set forth in
sections A, B, and C below, of the most significant aspects of such
statements.

A. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement of the Purpose of, and
Statutory Basis for, the Proposed Rule Change

1. Purpose
    Phlx proposes to amend its Pricing Schedule at Options 7, Section
4, ``Multiply Listed Options Fees (Includes options overlying equities,
ETFs, ETNs and indexes which are Multiply Listed) (Excludes SPY).''
Specifically, Phlx proposes to amend its Qualified Contingent Cross
(``QCC'') Growth Tier Rebate, in Section B of Options 7, Section 4, to
sunset the QCC Growth Tier Rebate. The QCC Growth Tier Rebate will be
available through July 31, 2023.
    Today, the Exchange offers a QCC Growth Tier Rebate to encourage
Phlx members and member organizations to transact a greater number of
QCC Orders on Phlx. In order to qualify for the QCC Growth Tier Rebate,
a member's or member organization's total floor transaction,\4\ and
electronic QCC Orders

and Floor QCC Orders volume (``QCC transaction volume'') must exceed
12,500,000 contracts in a given month. In addition to the
aforementioned criteria, the member's or member organization's
respective Phlx House Account \5\ must execute QCC transaction volume
of 250,000 or more contracts in excess of the member's or member
organization's QCC transaction volume in January 2023. For members or
member organizations with no QCC transaction volume in January 2023,
the QCC transaction volume, in their respective Phlx House Account,
must be 250,000 or more contracts in a given month.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \4\ The term ``floor transaction'' is a transaction that is
effected in open outcry on the Exchange's trading floor. See Phlx
Options 7, Section 1(c). Of note, the term ``floor transaction'' is
more broadly defined than the term ``Open Outcry Floor Transaction''
which is discussed herein and is a subset of the term ``floor
transaction''.
    \5\ Each Phlx member or member organization is required to
establish one Phlx House Account with the Exchange's Membership
Department. Only one Phlx House Account is required to transact
business on Phlx. The Exchange assesses a $50.00 a month account fee
for this account as provided for within Options 7, Section 8A. A
Phlx member or member organization has the option of acquiring
multiple Phlx House Accounts depending on a member's or member
organization's business model and how they elect to organize their
business.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    The Exchange also offers an alternative qualification to achieve
the QCC Growth Tier Rebate. A member's or member organization's Open
Outcry Floor Transaction volume \6\ in a given month must exceed
500,000 contracts. In addition to the aforementioned criteria, a
member's or member organization's respective Phlx House Account must
execute QCC transaction volume of 2,500,000 or more contracts in excess
of the member's or member organization's QCC transaction volume in
January 2023. For members or member organizations with no QCC
transaction volume in January 2023, the QCC transaction volume, in
their respective Phlx House Account, must be 2,500,000 or more
contracts in a given month.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \6\ The term ``Open Outcry Floor Transaction'' includes all
transactions executed in open outcry on Phlx's trading floor except:
(1) dividend, merger, short stock interest, reversal and conversion,
jelly roll, and box spread strategy executions as defined in this
Options 7, Section 4; (2) Cabinet Transactions as defined in Options
8, Section 33; and (3) Customer-to-Customer transactions.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    Today, the Exchange pays a $0.20 per contract QCC Growth Tier
Rebate on a QCC Order comprised of a Customer or Professional order on
one side and a Lead Market Maker, Market Maker, Broker-Dealer, or Firm
order on the other side. Further, the Exchange pays a $0.26 per
contract QCC Growth Tier Rebate on a QCC Order comprised of a Lead
Market Maker, Market Maker, Broker-Dealer, or Firm order on one side
and a Lead Market Maker, Market Maker, Broker-Dealer, or Firm order on
the other side. The Exchange pays the QCC Growth Tier Rebate on all
qualifying executed electronic QCC Orders, as defined in Options 3,
Section 12, and Floor QCC Orders, as defined in Options 8, Section 30I
[sic], except where the transaction is either: (i) Customer-to-
Customer; (ii) Customer-to-Professional; (iii) Professional-to-
Professional; or (iv) a dividend, merger, short stock interest,
reversal and conversion, jelly roll, and box spread strategy executions
(as defined in Options 7, Section 4). Finally, members and member
organizations are entitled to one QCC Rebate in a given month, either
the QCC Rebate in Section A or the QCC Growth Tier Rebate in Section B
in a given month, but not both.
    At this time, the Exchange proposes to sunset the QCC Growth Tier
Rebate. The QCC Growth Tier Rebate will be available through July 31,
2023.\7\ Despite only offering this program for 6 months, the Exchange
believes that it will continue to encourage members and member
organizations to earn larger QCC rebates by executing a larger amount
of floor transactions, QCC transaction volume, and Open Outcry Floor
Transaction volume on Phlx's trading floor.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \7\ The QCC Growth Tier Rebate will be available through the
close of business on July 31, 2023 but would not be available
thereafter. For example, as of August 1, 2023 the Exchange would no
longer offer the QCC Growth Tier Rebate.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

2. Statutory Basis
    The Exchange believes that its proposal is consistent with section
6(b) of the Act,\8\ in general, and furthers the objectives of sections
6(b)(4) and 6(b)(5) of the Act,\9\ in particular, in that it provides
for the equitable allocation of reasonable dues, fees and other charges
among members and issuers and other persons using any facility, and is
not designed to permit unfair discrimination between customers,
issuers, brokers, or dealers.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \8\ 15 U.S.C. 78f(b).
    \9\ 15 U.S.C. 78f(b)(4) and (5).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    The Commission and the courts have repeatedly expressed their
preference for competition over regulatory intervention in determining
prices, products, and services in the securities markets. In Regulation
NMS, while adopting a series of steps to improve the current market
model, the Commission highlighted the importance of market forces in
determining prices and SRO revenues and, also, recognized that current
regulation of the market system ``has been remarkably successful in
promoting market competition in its broader forms that are most
important to investors and listed companies.'' \10\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \10\ Securities Exchange Act Release No. 51808 (June 9, 2005),
70 FR 37496, 37499 (June 29, 2005) (``Regulation NMS Adopting
Release'').
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    Likewise, in NetCoalition v. Securities and Exchange Commission
\11\ (``NetCoalition'') the D.C. Circuit upheld the Commission's use of
a market-based approach in evaluating the fairness of market data fees
against a challenge claiming that Congress mandated a cost-based
approach.\12\ As the court emphasized, the Commission ``intended in
Regulation NMS that `market forces, rather than regulatory
requirements' play a role in determining the market data . . . to be
made available to investors and at what cost.'' \13\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \11\ NetCoalition v. SEC, 615 F.3d 525 (D.C. Cir. 2010).
    \12\ See NetCoalition, at 534-535.
    \13\ Id. at 537.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    Further, ``[n]o one disputes that competition for order flow is
`fierce.' . . . As the SEC explained, `[i]n the U.S. national market
system, buyers and sellers of securities, and the broker-dealers that
act as their order-routing agents, have a wide range of choices of
where to route orders for execution'; [and] `no exchange can afford to
take its market share percentages for granted' because `no exchange
possesses a monopoly, regulatory or otherwise, in the execution of
order flow from broker dealers' . . . .'' \14\ Although the court and
the SEC were discussing the cash equities markets, the Exchange
believes that these views apply with equal force to the options
markets.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \14\ Id. at 539 (quoting Securities Exchange Act Release No.
59039 (December 2, 2008), 73 FR 74770, 74782-83 (December 9, 2008)
(SR-NYSEArca-2006-21)).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    The Exchange's proposal to sunset the QCC Growth Tier Rebate is
reasonable because the Exchange believes that despite only offering
this program for 6 months, the rebate will continue to encourage
members and member organizations to earn larger QCC rebates by
executing a larger amount of floor transactions, QCC transaction
volume, and Open Outcry Floor Transaction volume on Phlx's trading
floor during the remaining months of the program. The Exchange believes
the rebate will continue to incentivize members and member
organizations to engage in substantial amounts of trading activity
which would serve to bring additional open outcry liquidity to the
trading floor and additional QCC Order Flow to Phlx. Also, this
incentive should continue to encourage members and member organizations
to commence sending such order flow to Phlx for the

opportunity to earn this rebate until the program expires.
    The Exchange's proposal to sunset the QCC Growth Tier Rebate is
equitable and not unfairly discriminatory because all members and
member organizations will be subject to the program during the 6 months
it is offered. The Exchange would no longer offer the rebate to any
member or member organization after the sunset date. Additionally, the
Exchange's proposal to establish a QCC Growth Tier Rebate is equitable
and not unfairly discriminatory because any member or member
organization may qualify for this rebate.

B. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement on Burden on Competition

    The Exchange does not believe that the proposed rule change will
impose any burden on competition not necessary or appropriate in
furtherance of the purposes of the Act.
Inter-Market Competition
    The proposal does not impose an undue burden on inter-market
competition. The Exchange believes its proposal remains competitive
with other options markets and will offer market participants with
another choice of where to transact options. The Exchange notes that it
operates in a highly competitive market in which market participants
can readily favor competing venues if they deem fee levels at a
particular venue to be excessive, or rebate opportunities available at
other venues to be more favorable. In such an environment, the Exchange
must continually adjust its fees to remain competitive with other
exchanges. Because competitors are free to modify their own fees in
response, and because market participants may readily adjust their
order routing practices, the Exchange believes that the degree to which
fee changes in this market may impose any burden on competition is
extremely limited.
Intra-Market Competition
    The proposed amendments do not impose an undue burden on intra-
market competition. In terms of intra-market competition, the
Exchange's proposal to sunset the QCC Growth Tier Rebate does not
impose an undue burden on competition because all members and member
organizations will be subject to the program during the 6 months it is
offered. The Exchange would no longer offer the rebate to any member or
member organization after the sunset date. Additionally, the Exchange's
proposal to establish a QCC Growth Tier Rebate is equitable and not
unfairly discriminatory because any member or member organization may
qualify for this rebate.

C. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement on Comments on the Proposed
Rule Change Received From Members, Participants, or Others

    No written comments were either solicited or received.

III. Date of Effectiveness of the Proposed Rule Change and Timing for
Commission Action

    The foregoing rule change has become effective pursuant to section
19(b)(3)(A)(ii) of the Act.\15\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \15\ 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(3)(A)(ii).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    At any time within 60 days of the filing of the proposed rule
change, the Commission summarily may temporarily suspend such rule
change if it appears to the Commission that such action is: (i)
necessary or appropriate in the public interest; (ii) for the
protection of investors; or (iii) otherwise in furtherance of the
purposes of the Act. If the Commission takes such action, the
Commission shall institute proceedings to determine whether the
proposed rule should be approved or disapproved.

IV. Solicitation of Comments

    Interested persons are invited to submit written data, views, and
arguments concerning the foregoing, including whether the proposed rule
change is consistent with the Act. Comments may be submitted by any of
the following methods:

Electronic Comments

     Use the Commission's internet comment form (https://www.sec.gov/rules/sro.shtml); or
     Send an email to [email protected]. Please include
File Number SR-Phlx-2023-14 on the subject line.

Paper Comments

     Send paper comments in triplicate to Secretary, Securities
and Exchange Commission, 100 F Street NE, Washington, DC 20549-1090.

All submissions should refer to File Number SR-Phlx-2023-14. This file
number should be included on the subject line if email is used. To help
the Commission process and review your comments more efficiently,
please use only one method. The Commission will post all comments on
the Commission's internet website (https://www.sec.gov/rules/sro.shtml). Copies of the submission, all subsequent amendments, all
written statements with respect to the proposed rule change that are
filed with the Commission, and all written communications relating to
the proposed rule change between the Commission and any person, other
than those that may be withheld from the public in accordance with the
provisions of 5 U.S.C. 552, will be available for website viewing and
printing in the Commission's Public Reference Room, 100 F Street NE,
Washington, DC 20549, on official business days between the hours of
10:00 a.m. and 3:00 p.m. Copies of the filing also will be available
for inspection and copying at the principal office of the Exchange. Do
not include personal identifiable information in submissions; you
should submit only information that you wish to make available
publicly. We may redact in part or withhold entirely from publication
submitted material that is obscene or subject to copyright protection.
All submissions should refer to File Number SR-Phlx-2023-14 and should
be submitted on or before May 30, 2023.

    For the Commission, by the Division of Trading and Markets,
pursuant to delegated authority.\16\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \16\ 17 CFR 200.30-3(a)(12).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

Sherry R. Haywood,
Assistant Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2023-09678 Filed 5-5-23; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 8011-01-P


[Federal Register Volume 83, Number 43 (Monday, March 5, 2018)]
[Proposed Rules]
[Pages 9247-9249]
[FR Doc No: 2018-04368]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY

Coast Guard

33 CFR Part 165

[Docket Number USCG-2018-0081]
RIN 1625-AA00

Safety Zone; Xterra Swim, Intracoastal Waterway; Myrtle Beach, SC

AGENCY: Coast Guard, DHS.

ACTION: Notice of proposed rulemaking.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Coast Guard proposes to establish a temporary safety zone
on certain waters of the Atlantic Intracoastal Waterway in Myrtle
Beach, South Carolina. This proposed safety zone is necessary to
provide for the safety of the swimmers, participant vessels,
spectators, and the general public during the swim portion of the
Xterra Triathlon. This rule is intended to prohibit non-participant
vessels and persons from entering, transiting through, anchoring in, or
remaining within the safety zone unless authorized by the Captain of
the Port Charleston or a designated representative. We invite your
comments on this proposed rulemaking.

DATES: Comments and related material must be received by the Coast
Guard on or before April 4, 2018.

ADDRESSES: You may submit comments identified by docket number USCG-
2018-0081 using the Federal eRulemaking Portal at http://www.regulations.gov. See the ``Public Participation and Request for
Comments'' portion of the SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION section for further
instructions on submitting comments.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: If you have questions about this
proposed rulemaking, call or email Lieutenant Justin Heck, Sector
Charleston Office of Waterways Management, Coast Guard; telephone (843)
740-3184, email [email protected].

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

I. Table of Abbreviations

CFR Code of Federal Regulations
DHS Department of Homeland Security
E.O. Executive Order
FR Federal Register
NPRM Notice of Proposed Rulemaking
Pub. L. Public Law
Sec.  Section
U.S.C. United States Code
COTP Captain of the Port

II. Background, Purpose, and Legal Basis

    On January 22, 2018, Go Race Productions notified the Coast Guard
that it would be sponsoring the Xterra Myrtle Beach Triathlon from 8
a.m. to 9 a.m. on April 22, 2018. Approximately 75 swimmers are
anticipated to participate in the swim portion of the event, which is
located on certain waters of the Atlantic Intracoastal Waterway in
Myrtle Beach, South Carolina. The Captain of the Port Charleston (COTP)
has determined that the potential hazards associated with the swim
portion of the Triathlon constitute a safety concern for anyone within
the proposed safety zone. The purpose of this rulemaking is to ensure
safety of life on the navigable water of the United States during the
event. The Coast Guard proposes this rulemaking under authority in 33
U.S.C. 1231.

III. Discussion of Proposed Rule

    The Coast Guard proposes to establish a temporary safety zone on
the Atlantic Intracoastal Waterway in Myrtle Beach, South Carolina
during the Xterra Myrtle Beach Triathlon, on April 22, 2018. The
duration of the safety zone is intended to ensure the safety of life on
the navigable waters of the Intracoastal before, during, and after the
scheduled 8 a.m. to 9 a.m. swim portion of the Triathlon. Approximately
75 participants are expected to participate in the swim portion of the
race. No vessel or person would be permitted to enter, transit through,
anchor in, or remain within the safety zone without obtaining
permission from the COTP or a designated representative. The Coast
Guard will provide notice of the safety zone by Local Notice to
Mariners, Broadcast Notice to Mariners, and on-scene designated
representatives. The proposed regulatory text appears at the end of
this document.

IV. Regulatory Analyses

    We developed this proposed rule after considering numerous statutes
and executive orders related to rulemaking. Below we summarize our
analyses based on a number of these statutes and executive orders and
we discuss First Amendment rights of protestors.

A. Regulatory Planning and Review

    Executive Orders 12866 and 13563 direct agencies to assess the
costs and benefits of available regulatory alternatives and, if
regulation is necessary, to select regulatory approaches that maximize
net benefits. Executive Order 13771 directs agencies to control
regulatory costs through a budgeting process. This NPRM has not been
designated a ``significant regulatory action,'' under Executive Order
12866. Accordingly, the NPRM has not been reviewed by the Office of
Management and Budget (OMB), and pursuant to OMB guidance it is exempt
from the requirements of Executive Order 13771.
    The economic impact of this rule is not significant for the
following reasons: (1) The safety zone will only be enforced for one
hour; (2) although persons and vessels may not enter, transit through,
anchor in, or remain within the safety zone without authorization from
the Captain of the Port Charleston or a designated representative, they
may operate in the surrounding area during the enforcement period; and
(3) the Coast Guard will provide advance notification of the safety
zone to the local maritime community by Local Notice to Mariners and
Broadcast Notice to Mariners.

B. Impact on Small Entities

    The Regulatory Flexibility Act of 1980, 5 U.S.C. 601-612, as
amended, requires Federal agencies to consider the potential impact of
regulations on ``small entities'' comprised of small businesses and
not-for-profit organizations that are independently owned and operated
and are not dominant in their fields, and governmental jurisdictions
with populations of less than 50,000. The Coast Guard certifies under 5
U.S.C. 605(b) that this proposed rule would not have a significant
economic impact on a substantial number of small entities.
    We have considered the impact of this proposed rule on small
entities. This rule may affect the following entities, some of which
may be small entities: The owner or operators of vessels intending to
enter, transit through, anchor in, or remain within the regulated area
during the enforcement period. For the reasons stated in section IV.A.
above, this proposed rule would not have a significant economic impact
on a substantial number of small entities.
    If you think that your business, organization, or governmental
jurisdiction qualifies as a small entity and that this rule would have
a significant economic impact on it, please submit a comment (see
ADDRESSES) explaining why you think it qualifies and how and to what
degree this rule would economically affect it.
    Under section 213(a) of the Small Business Regulatory Enforcement
Fairness Act of 1996 (Pub. L. 104-121), we want to assist small
entities in understanding this proposed rule. If the rule would affect
your small business, organization, or governmental jurisdiction and you
have questions concerning its provisions or options for compliance,
please contact the person listed in the FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT
section. The Coast Guard will not retaliate against small entities that
question or complain about this proposed rule or any policy or action
of the Coast Guard.

C. Collection of Information

    This proposed rule would not call for a new collection of
information under the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 (44 U.S.C. 3501-
3520).

D. Federalism and Indian Tribal Governments

    A rule has implications for federalism under Executive Order 13132,
Federalism, if it has a substantial direct effect on the States, on the
relationship between the national government and the States, or on the
distribution of power and responsibilities among the various levels of
government. We have analyzed this proposed rule under that Order and
have determined that it is consistent with the fundamental federalism
principles and preemption requirements described in E.O. 13132.
    Also, this proposed rule does not have tribal implications under
Executive Order 13175, Consultation and Coordination with Indian Tribal
Governments, because it would not have a substantial direct effect on
one or more Indian tribes, on the relationship between the Federal
Government and Indian tribes, or on the distribution of power and
responsibilities between the Federal Government and Indian tribes. If
you believe this proposed rule has implications for federalism or
Indian tribes, please contact the person listed in the FOR FURTHER
INFORMATION CONTACT section above.

E. Unfunded Mandates Reform Act

    The Unfunded Mandates Reform Act of 1995 (2 U.S.C. 1531-1538)
requires Federal agencies to assess the effects of their discretionary
regulatory actions. In particular, the Act addresses actions that may
result in the expenditure by a State, local, or tribal government, in
the aggregate, or by the private sector of $100,000,000 (adjusted for
inflation) or more in any one year. Though this proposed rule would not
result in such an expenditure, we do discuss the effects of this rule
elsewhere in this preamble.

F. Environment

    We have analyzed this proposed rule under Department of Homeland
Security Management Directive 023-01,

which guide the Coast Guard in complying with the National
Environmental Policy Act of 1969 (42 U.S.C. 4321-4370f), and have made
a preliminary determination that this action is one of a category of
actions that do not individually or cumulatively have a significant
effect on the human environment. This proposed rule involves a
temporary safety zone with a two-hour enforcement period that would
prohibit entry to certain waters of the Atlantic Intracoastal Waterway
during the swim portion of a Triathlon. Normally such actions are
categorically excluded from further review under paragraph L 60(a) of
Appendix A, Table 1 of DHS Instruction Manual 023-01-001-01, Rev. 01. A
preliminary Record of Environmental Consideration supporting this
determination is available in the docket where indicated under
ADDRESSES. We seek any comments or information that may lead to the
discovery of a significant environmental impact from this proposed
rule.

G. Protest Activities

    The Coast Guard respects the First Amendment rights of protesters.
Protesters are asked to contact the person listed in the FOR FURTHER
INFORMATION CONTACT section to coordinate protest activities so that
your message can be received without jeopardizing the safety or
security of people, places, or vessels.

V. Public Participation and Request for Comments

    We view public participation as essential to effective rulemaking,
and will consider all comments and material received during the comment
period. Your comment can help shape the outcome of this rulemaking. If
you submit a comment, please include the docket number for this
rulemaking, indicate the specific section of this document to which
each comment applies, and provide a reason for each suggestion or
recommendation.
    We encourage you to submit comments through the Federal eRulemaking
Portal at http://www.regulations.gov. If your material cannot be
submitted using http://www.regulations.gov, contact the person in the
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT section of this document for alternate
instructions.
    We accept anonymous comments. All comments received will be posted
without change to http://www.regulations.gov and will include any
personal information you have provided. For more about privacy and the
docket, visit http://www.regulations.gov/privacyNotice.
    Documents mentioned in this NPRM as being available in the docket,
and all public comments, will be in our online docket at http://www.regulations.gov and can be viewed by following that website's
instructions. Additionally, if you go to the online docket and sign up
for email alerts, you will be notified when comments are posted or a
final rule is published.

List of Subjects in 33 CFR Part 165

    Harbors, Marine safety, Navigation (water), Reporting and
recordkeeping requirements, Security measures, Waterways.

    For the reasons discussed in the preamble, the Coast Guard proposes
to amend 33 CFR part 165 as follows:

PART 165--SAFETY OF LIFE ON NAVIGABLE WATERS

0
1. The authority citation for part 165 continues to read as follows:

    Authority:  33 U.S.C. 1231; 50 U.S.C. 191, 33 CFR 1.05-1, 6.04-
1, 6.04-6, 160.5; and Department of Homeland Security Delegation No.
0170.1.

0
2. Add a temporary Sec.  165. T07-0081 to read as follows:

Sec.  165.T07-0081  Safety Zone; Xterra Swim, Myrtle Beach SC

    (a) Location. The following is a safety zone: Certain waters of the
Atlantic Intracoastal Waterway within the following two points of
position and the North shore: 33[deg]45'03'' N, 78[deg]50'47'' W to
33[deg]45'18'' N, 78[deg]50'14'' W, located in Myrtle Beach, South
Carolina. All coordinates are North American Datum 1983.
    (b) Definition. The term ``designated representative'' means Coast
Guard Patrol Commanders, including Coast Guard coxswains, petty
officers, and other officers operating Coast Guard vessels, and
Federal, state, and local officers designated by or assisting the
Captain of the Port Charleston in the enforcement of the regulated
areas.
    (c) Regulations.
    (1) All persons and vessels are prohibited from entering,
transiting through, anchoring in, or remaining within the regulated
area unless authorized by the Captain of the Port Charleston or a
designated representative.
    (2) Persons and vessels desiring to enter, transit through, anchor
in, or remain within the regulated area may contact the Captain of the
Port Charleston by telephone at<PHONE_NUMBER>, or a designated
representative via VHF radio on channel 16, to request authorization.
If authorization to enter, transit through, anchor in, or remain within
the regulated area is granted by the Captain of the Port Charleston or
a designated representative, all persons and vessels receiving such
authorization must comply with the instructions of the Captain of the
Port Charleston or a designated representative.
    (3) The Coast Guard will provide notice of the regulated area by
Local Notice to Mariners, Broadcast Notice to Mariners, and on-scene
designated representatives.
    (d) Enforcement Period. This rule will be enforced on from 7:30
a.m. until 9:30 a.m. on April 22, 2018.

    Dated: February 20, 2018.
John W. Reed,
Captain, U.S. Coast Guard, Captain of the Port Charleston.
[FR Doc. 2018-04368 Filed 3-2-18; 8:45 am]
 BILLING CODE 9110-04-P


[Federal Register: October 28, 2009 (Volume 74, Number 207)]
[Proposed Rules]
[Page 55485-55488]
[DOCID:fr28oc09-19]

=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION

Federal Aviation Administration

14 CFR Part 39

[Docket No. FAA-2009-0993; Directorate Identifier 2009-NM-089-AD]
RIN 2120-AA64

Airworthiness Directives; Airbus Model A300 B4-2C, B4-103, and
B4-203 Airplanes; and Model A300 B4-601, B4-603, B4-620, B4-622, B4-
605R, and B4-622R Airplanes

AGENCY: Federal Aviation Administration (FAA), DOT.

ACTION: Notice of proposed rulemaking (NPRM).

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: We propose to adopt a new airworthiness directive (AD) for the
products listed above. This proposed AD results from mandatory
continuing airworthiness information (MCAI) originated by an aviation
authority of another country to identify and correct an unsafe
condition on an aviation product. The MCAI describes the unsafe
condition as:

    One A300-600 aeroplane operator reported that, during a routine
inspection, the Right Hand frame 40 forward fitting between stringer
32 and stringer 33 was found cracked. The subject aeroplane had
previously been modified in accordance with Airbus SB A300-57-6053
(Airbus Modification 10453).
    This condition, if not corrected, could result in a
deterioration of the structural integrity of the frame.
* * * * *

The proposed AD would require actions that are intended to address the
unsafe condition described in the MCAI.

DATES: We must receive comments on this proposed AD by December 14,
2009.

ADDRESSES: You may send comments by any of the following methods:
     Federal eRulemaking Portal: Go to http://
www.regulations.gov. Follow the instructions for submitting comments.
     Fax:<PHONE_NUMBER>.
     Mail: U.S. Department of Transportation, Docket
Operations, M-30, West Building Ground Floor, Room W12-140, 1200 New
Jersey Avenue, SE., Washington, DC 20590.
     Hand Delivery: U.S. Department of Transportation, Docket
Operations, M-30, West Building Ground Floor, Room W12-40, 1200 New
Jersey Avenue, SE., Washington, DC, between 9 a.m. and 5 p.m., Monday
through Friday, except Federal holidays.
    For service information identified in this proposed AD, contact
Airbus SAS--EAW (Airworthiness Office), 1 Rond Point Maurice Bellonte,
31707 Blagnac Cedex, France; telephone +33 5 61 93 36 96; fax +33 5 61
93 44 51; e-mail<EMAIL_ADDRESS>Internet http://
www.airbus.com. You may review copies of the referenced service
information at the FAA, Transport Airplane Directorate, 1601 Lind
Avenue, SW., Renton, Washington. For information on the availability of
this material at the FAA, call<PHONE_NUMBER> or<PHONE_NUMBER>.

Examining the AD Docket

    You may examine the AD docket on the Internet at http://
www.regulations.gov; or in person at the Docket Operations office
between 9 a.m. and 5 p.m., Monday through Friday, except Federal
holidays. The AD docket contains this proposed AD, the regulatory
evaluation, any comments received, and other information. The street
address for the Docket Operations office (telephone<PHONE_NUMBER>) is
in the ADDRESSES section. Comments will be available in the AD docket
shortly after receipt.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Dan Rodina, Aerospace Engineer,
International Branch, ANM-116, Transport Airplane Directorate, FAA,
1601 Lind Avenue, SW., Renton, Washington 98057-3356; telephone (425)
227-2125; fax<PHONE_NUMBER>.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

Comments Invited

    We invite you to send any written relevant data, views, or
arguments about this proposed AD. Send your comments to an address
listed under the ADDRESSES section. Include ``Docket No. FAA-2009-0993;
Directorate Identifier 2009-NM-089-AD'' at the beginning of your
comments. We specifically invite comments on the overall regulatory,
economic, environmental, and energy aspects of this proposed AD. We
will consider all comments received by the closing date and may amend
this proposed AD based on those comments.
    We have lengthened the 30-day comment period for proposed ADs that
address MCAI originated by aviation authorities of other countries to
provide adequate time for interested parties to submit comments. The
comment period for these proposed ADs is now typically 45 days, which
is consistent with the comment period for domestic transport ADs.
    We will post all comments we receive, without change, to http://
www.regulations.gov, including any personal information you provide. We
will also post a report summarizing each substantive verbal contact we
receive about this proposed AD.

Discussion

    The European Aviation Safety Agency (EASA), which is the Technical
Agent for the Member States of the European Community, has issued
Airworthiness Directive 2009-0094, dated April 21, 2009 (Correction:
May 29, 2009) (referred to after this as ``the MCAI''), to correct an
unsafe condition for the specified products. The MCAI states:

    One A300-600 aeroplane operator reported that, during a routine
inspection, the Right Hand frame 40 forward fitting between stringer
32 and stringer 33 was found cracked. The subject aeroplane had
previously been modified in accordance with Airbus SB A300-57-6053
(Airbus Modification 10453).
    This condition, if not corrected, could result in a
deterioration of the structural integrity of the frame.
    As no fatigue maintenance tasks (Inspection SB or Airworthiness
Limitation Item) presently exist to inspect the affected area for
aeroplanes having incorporated Airbus Modification 10453
preventively (without preliminary crack finding), Airbus has
developed a new inspection [for cracking, and repair if necessary]
to ensure structural integrity of the concerned area of frame 40.
* * * * *

    You may obtain further information by examining the MCAI in the AD
docket.

Relevant Service Information

    Airbus has issued the following service information. The actions
described in this service information are intended to correct the
unsafe condition identified in the MCAI.
     For Model A300 airplanes: Mandatory Service Bulletin A300-
53A0387, including Appendices 01 and 02, dated September 12, 2008; and
Service Bulletin A300-53-0268, Revision 06, dated January 7, 2002.
     For Model A300-600 airplanes: Mandatory Service Bulletin
A300-57A6108, including Appendices 01 and 02, dated September 12, 2008;
and Service Bulletin A300-57-6052, Revision 03, dated May 27, 2002,
including Drawings 15R53810394, Issue A, dated December 21, 1998, and
21R57110247, Issue A, dated June 20, 1997.

FAA's Determination and Requirements of This Proposed AD

    This product has been approved by the aviation authority of another
country, and is approved for operation in the United States. Pursuant
to our bilateral agreement with the State of Design Authority, we have
been notified of the unsafe condition described in the MCAI and service
information referenced above. We are proposing this AD because we
evaluated all pertinent information and determined an unsafe condition
exists and is likely to exist or develop on other products of the same
type design.

Differences Between This AD and the MCAI or Service Information

    We have reviewed the MCAI and related service information and, in
general, agree with their substance. But we might have found it
necessary to use different words from those in the MCAI to ensure the
AD is clear for U.S. operators and is enforceable. In making these
changes, we do not intend to differ substantively from the information
provided in the MCAI and related service information.
    We might also have proposed different actions in this AD from those
in the MCAI in order to follow FAA policies. Any such differences are
highlighted in a NOTE within the proposed AD.

Costs of Compliance

    Based on the service information, we estimate that this proposed AD
would affect about 153 products of U.S. registry. We also estimate that
it would take about 3 work-hours per product to comply with the basic
requirements of this proposed AD. The average labor rate is $80 per
work-hour. Based on these figures, we estimate the cost of the proposed
AD on U.S. operators to be $36,720, or $240 per product.

Authority for This Rulemaking

    Title 49 of the United States Code specifies the FAA's authority to
issue rules on aviation safety. Subtitle I, section 106, describes the
authority of the FAA Administrator. ``Subtitle VII:

Aviation Programs,'' describes in more detail the scope of the Agency's
authority.
    We are issuing this rulemaking under the authority described in
``Subtitle VII, Part A, Subpart III, Section 44701: General
requirements.'' Under that section, Congress charges the FAA with
promoting safe flight of civil aircraft in air commerce by prescribing
regulations for practices, methods, and procedures the Administrator
finds necessary for safety in air commerce. This regulation is within
the scope of that authority because it addresses an unsafe condition
that is likely to exist or develop on products identified in this
rulemaking action.

Regulatory Findings

    We determined that this proposed AD would not have federalism
implications under Executive Order 13132. This proposed AD would not
have a substantial direct effect on the States, on the relationship
between the national Government and the States, or on the distribution
of power and responsibilities among the various levels of government.
    For the reasons discussed above, I certify this proposed
regulation:
    1. Is not a ``significant regulatory action'' under Executive Order
12866;
    2. Is not a ``significant rule'' under the DOT Regulatory Policies
and Procedures (44 FR 11034, February 26, 1979); and
    3. Will not have a significant economic impact, positive or
negative, on a substantial number of small entities under the criteria
of the Regulatory Flexibility Act.
    We prepared a regulatory evaluation of the estimated costs to
comply with this proposed AD and placed it in the AD docket.

List of Subjects in 14 CFR Part 39

    Air transportation, Aircraft, Aviation safety, Incorporation by
reference, Safety.

The Proposed Amendment

    Accordingly, under the authority delegated to me by the
Administrator, the FAA proposes to amend 14 CFR part 39 as follows:

PART 39--AIRWORTHINESS DIRECTIVES

    1. The authority citation for part 39 continues to read as follows:

    Authority: 49 U.S.C. 106(g), 40113, 44701.

Sec.  39.13  [Amended]

    2. The FAA amends Sec.  39.13 by adding the following new AD:

Airbus: Docket No. FAA-2009-0993; Directorate Identifier 2009-NM-
089-AD.

Comments Due Date

    (a) We must receive comments by December 14, 2009.

Affected ADs

    (b) None.

Applicability

    (c) This AD applies to Airbus airplanes, certificated in any
category, as identified in paragraphs (c)(1) and (c)(2) of this AD.
    (1) Model A300 B4-2C, B4-103, and B4-203 airplanes, all serial
numbers, modified preventively in service (without preliminary crack
findings) in accordance with Airbus Service Bulletin A300-53-0297
(Airbus Modification 10453).
    (2) Model A300 B4-601, B4-603, B4-605R, B4-620, B4-622, and B4-
622R airplanes, all serial numbers, modified preventively in service
(without preliminary crack findings) in accordance with Airbus
Service Bulletin A300-57-6053 (Airbus Modification 10453).

    Note 1: For airplanes on which Airbus Service Bulletin A300-53-
0297 or A300-57-6053 (Airbus Modification 10453), as applicable,
have been incorporated as a corrective action (repair following
crack finding), no action is required by this AD.

Subject

    (d) Air Transport Association (ATA) of America Code 53:
Fuselage.

Reason

    (e) The mandatory continuing airworthiness information (MCAI)
states:
    One A300-600 aeroplane operator reported that, during a routine
inspection, the Right Hand frame 40 forward fitting between stringer
32 and stringer 33 was found cracked. The subject aeroplane had
previously been modified in accordance with Airbus SB A300-57-6053
(Airbus Modification 10453).
    This condition, if not corrected, could result in a
deterioration of the structural integrity of the frame.
    As no fatigue maintenance tasks (Inspection SB or Airworthiness
Limitation Item) presently exist to inspect the affected area for
aeroplanes having incorporated Airbus Modification 10453
preventively (without preliminary crack finding), Airbus has
developed a new inspection [for cracking, and repair if necessary]
to ensure structural integrity of the concerned area of frame 40.
* * * * *

Actions and Compliance

    (f) Unless already done, do the following actions.
    (1) At the applicable time specified in Table 1 of this AD: Do a
one-time detailed visual inspection of the forward fitting at frame
40 on both sides of the airplane, in accordance with Airbus
Mandatory Service Bulletin A300-57A6108 (for Model A300 B4-601, B4-
603, B4-605R, B4-620, B4-622, and B4-622R airplanes) or A300-53A0387
(for Model A300 B4-2C, B4-103, and B4-203 airplanes), both including
Appendices 01 and 02, both dated September 12, 2008.

                        Table 1--Compliance Times
------------------------------------------------------------------------
   Airplane models/configuration               Compliance time
------------------------------------------------------------------------
A300 B4-2C and B4-103 airplanes on  Prior to the accumulation of 18,000
 which Airbus Service Bulletin       total flight cycles, or within 3
 A300-53-0297 was done prior to      months after the effective date of
 the accumulation of 9,000 total     this AD, whichever occurs later.
 flight cycles.
A300 B4-2C and B4-103 airplanes on  Within 5,500 flight cycles after
 which Airbus Service Bulletin       accomplishment of Airbus Service
 A300-53-0297 was done on or after   Bulletin A300-53-0297, or within 6
 the accumulation of 9,000 total     months after the effective date of
 flight cycles.                      this AD, whichever occurs later;
                                     except, for airplanes that, as of
                                     the effective date of this AD, have
                                     accumulated 11,000 flight cycles or
                                     more since accomplishment of Airbus
                                     Service Bulletin A300-53-0297,
                                     within 3 months after the effective
                                     date of this AD.
A300 B4-203 airplanes on which      Prior to the accumulation of 15,000
 Airbus Service Bulletin A300-53-    total flight cycles, or within 3
 0297 was done prior to the          months after the effective date of
 accumulation of 8,300 total         this AD, whichever occurs later.
 flight cycles.
A300 B4-203 airplanes on which      Within 4,100 flight cycles after
 Airbus Service Bulletin A300-53-    accomplishment of Airbus Service
 0297 was done on or after the       Bulletin A300-53-0297, or within 6
 accumulation of 8,300 total         months after the effective date of
 flight cycles.                      this AD, whichever occurs later;
                                     except, for airplanes that, as of
                                     the effective date of this AD, have
                                     accumulated 8,200 flight cycles or
                                     more since accomplishment of Airbus
                                     Service Bulletin A300-53-0297,
                                     within 3 months after the effective
                                     date of this AD.
A300 B4-601, B4-603, B4-605R, B4-   Prior to the accumulation of 11,500
 620, B4-622, and B4-622R            total flight cycles, or within 3
 airplanes on which Airbus Service   months after the effective date of
 Bulletin A300-57-6053 was done      this AD, whichever occurs later.
 prior to the accumulation of
 6,100 total flight cycles.

A300 B4-601, B4-603, B4-605R, B4-   Within 3,300 flight cycles after
 620, B4-622, and B4-622R            accomplishment of Airbus Service
 airplanes on which Airbus Service   Bulletin A300-57-6053, or within 6
 Bulletin A300-57-6053 was done on   months after the effective date of
 or after the accumulation of        this AD, whichever occurs later;
 6,100 total flight cycles.          except, for airplanes that, as of
                                     the effective date of this AD, have
                                     accumulated 6,600 flight cycles or
                                     more since accomplishment of Airbus
                                     Service Bulletin A300-57-6053,
                                     within 3 months after the effective
                                     date of this AD.
------------------------------------------------------------------------

     (2) Except as required by paragraph (f)(3) of this AD: If any
crack is found during the inspection required by paragraph (f)(1) of
this AD, before further flight, do a temporary or definitive repair,
as applicable, in accordance with the Accomplishment Instructions of
Airbus Service Bulletin A300-53-0268, Revision 06, dated January 7,
2002 (for Model A300 B4-2C, B4-103, and B4-203 airplanes); or A300-
57-6052, Revision 03, dated May 27, 2002, including Drawings
15R53810394, Issue A, dated December 21, 1998, and 21R57110247,
Issue A, dated June 20, 1997 (for Model A300 B4-601, B4-603, B4-
605R, B4-620, B4-622, and B4-622R airplanes).
    (3) If any crack found during the inspection required by
paragraph (f)(1) of this AD cannot be repaired in accordance with
Airbus Service Bulletin A300-53-0268, Revision 06, dated January 7,
2002; or A300-57-6052, Revision 03, dated May 27, 2002: Contact
Airbus for repair instructions and before further flight repair the
crack using a method approved by the Manager, International Branch,
ANM-116, Transport Airplane Directorate, FAA.
    (4) Submit an inspection report in accordance with Appendix 01
of Airbus Mandatory Service Bulletin A300-53A0387, dated September
12, 2008 (for Model A300 B4-2C, B4-103, and B4-203 airplanes); or
Airbus Mandatory Service Bulletin A300-57A6108, dated September 12,
2008 (for Model A300 B4-601, B4-603, B4-605R, B4-620, B4-622, and
B4-622R airplanes); to the address identified on the reporting
sheet, at the applicable time specified in paragraph (f)(4)(i) or
(f)(4)(ii) of this AD.
    (i) If the inspection was done on or after the effective date of
this AD: Submit the report within 30 days after the inspection.
    (ii) If the inspection was done before the effective date of
this AD: Submit the report within 30 days after the effective date
of this AD.

FAA AD Differences

    Note 2: This AD differs from the MCAI and/or service information
as follows: Although the MCAI or Airbus Service Bulletin A300-53-
0268, Revision 06, dated January 7, 2002; or A300-57-6052, Revision
03, dated May 27, 2002; allows further flight after cracks are found
during compliance with the required action, paragraph (f)(3) of this
AD requires that you repair the cracks before further flight.

Other FAA AD Provisions

    (g) The following provisions also apply to this AD:
    (1) Alternative Methods of Compliance (AMOCs): The Manager,
International Branch, ANM-116, Transport Airplane Directorate, FAA,
has the authority to approve AMOCs for this AD, if requested using
the procedures found in 14 CFR 39.19. Send information to ATTN: Dan
Rodina, Aerospace Engineer, International Branch, ANM-116, Transport
Airplane Directorate, FAA, 1601 Lind Avenue, SW., Renton, Washington
98057-3356; telephone<PHONE_NUMBER>; fax<PHONE_NUMBER>. Before
using any approved AMOC on any airplane to which the AMOC applies,
notify your principal maintenance inspector (PMI) or principal
avionics inspector (PAI), as appropriate, or lacking a principal
inspector, your local Flight Standards District Office. The AMOC
approval letter must specifically reference this AD.
    (2) Airworthy Product: For any requirement in this AD to obtain
corrective actions from a manufacturer or other source, use these
actions if they are FAA-approved. Corrective actions are considered
FAA-approved if they are approved by the State of Design Authority
(or their delegated agent). You are required to assure the product
is airworthy before it is returned to service.
    (3) Reporting Requirements: For any reporting requirement in
this AD, under the provisions of the Paperwork Reduction Act, the
Office of Management and Budget (OMB) has approved the information
collection requirements and has assigned OMB Control Number 2120-
0056.

Related Information

    (h) Refer to MCAI European Aviation Safety Agency Airworthiness
Directive 2009-0094, dated April 21, 2009 (Correction: May 29,
2009); and the applicable service information specified in Table 2
of this AD for related information.

                                      Table 2--Related Service Information
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
                Document                           Revision                              Date
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Airbus Mandatory Service Bulletin A300-   Original.................  September 12, 2008.
 53A0387, including Appendices 01 and 02.
Airbus Mandatory Service Bulletin A300-   Original.................  September 12, 2008.
 57A6108, including Appendices 01 and 02.
Airbus Service Bulletin A300-53-0268....  06.......................  January 7, 2002.
Airbus Service Bulletin A300-57-6052,     03.......................  May 27, 2002.
 including Drawings 15R53810394, Issue
 A, dated December 21, 1998, and
 21R57110247, Issue A, dated June 20,
 1997.
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

    Issued in Renton, Washington, on October 19, 2009.
Ali Bahrami,
Manager, Transport Airplane Directorate, Aircraft Certification
Service.
[FR Doc. E9-25864 Filed 10-27-09; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4910-13-P


[Federal Register: December 23, 2008 (Volume 73, Number 247)]
[Proposed Rules]
[Page 78670-78672]
[DOCID:fr23de08-22]

=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION

Federal Aviation Administration

14 CFR Part 39

[Docket No. FAA-2008-1327; Directorate Identifier 2008-NM-161-AD]
RIN 2120-AA64

Airworthiness Directives; Airbus Model A318, A319, A320, and A321
Airplanes

AGENCY: Federal Aviation Administration (FAA), DOT.

ACTION: Notice of proposed rulemaking (NPRM).

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: We propose to adopt a new airworthiness directive (AD) for the
products listed above. This proposed AD results from mandatory
continuing airworthiness information (MCAI) originated by an aviation
authority of another country to identify and correct an unsafe
condition on an aviation product. The MCAI describes the unsafe
condition as:

    An A320 aircraft experienced an event where it was not possible
to open the reinforced cockpit door, even after power had been
removed from the aircraft. Investigation has identified that the
cockpit door latch/striker assembly may have overheated, causing
permanent internal damage prior to being electrically isolated by
the internal thermal fuse. This condition, in case of a rapid
decompression in the cockpit, would prevent the necessary unlocking/
opening of the door, which may lead to failure of the airplane
structure.

* * * * *
The proposed AD would require actions that are intended to address the
unsafe condition described in the MCAI.

DATES: We must receive comments on this proposed AD by January 22,
2009.

ADDRESSES: You may send comments by any of the following methods:
     Federal eRulemaking Portal: Go to http://
www.regulations.gov. Follow the instructions for submitting comments.
     Fax:<PHONE_NUMBER>.
     Mail: U.S. Department of Transportation, Docket
Operations, M-30, West Building Ground Floor, Room W12-140, 1200 New
Jersey Avenue, SE., Washington, DC 20590.
     Hand Delivery: U.S. Department of Transportation, Docket
Operations, M-30, West Building Ground Floor, Room W12-40, 1200 New
Jersey Avenue, SE., Washington, DC, between 9 a.m. and 5 p.m., Monday
through Friday, except Federal holidays.
    For service information identified in this proposed AD, contact
Airbus, Airworthiness Office--EAS, 1 Rond Point Maurice Bellonte, 31707
Blagnac Cedex, France; fax +33 5 61 93 44 51; e-mail: account.airworth-
<EMAIL_ADDRESS>Internet http://www.airbus.com. You may review copies
of the referenced service information at the FAA, Transport Airplane
Directorate, 1601 Lind Avenue, SW., Renton, Washington. For information
on the availability of this material at the FAA, call<PHONE_NUMBER> or
425-227-1152.

Examining the AD Docket

    You may examine the AD docket on the Internet at http://
www.regulations.gov; or in person at the Docket Operations office
between 9 a.m. and 5 p.m., Monday through Friday, except Federal
holidays. The AD docket contains this proposed AD, the regulatory
evaluation, any comments received, and other information. The street
address for the Docket Operations office (telephone<PHONE_NUMBER>) is
in the ADDRESSES section. Comments will be available in the AD docket
shortly after receipt.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Tim Dulin, Aerospace Engineer,
International Branch, ANM-116, Transport Airplane Directorate, FAA,
1601 Lind Avenue, SW., Renton, Washington 98057-3356; telephone (425)
227-2141; fax<PHONE_NUMBER>.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

Comments Invited

    We invite you to send any written relevant data, views, or
arguments about this proposed AD. Send your comments to an address
listed under the ADDRESSES section. Include ``Docket No. FAA-2008-1327;
Directorate Identifier 2008-NM-161-AD'' at the beginning of your
comments. We specifically invite comments on the overall regulatory,
economic, environmental, and energy aspects of this proposed AD. We
will consider all comments received by the closing date and may amend
this proposed AD based on those comments.
    We will post all comments we receive, without change, to http://
www.regulations.gov, including any personal information you provide. We
will also post a report summarizing each substantive verbal contact we
receive about this proposed AD.

Discussion

    The European Aviation Safety Agency (EASA), which is the Technical
Agent for the Member States of the European Community, has issued EASA
Airworthiness Directive 2008-0151, dated August 5, 2008 (referred to
after this as ``the MCAI''), to correct an unsafe condition for the
specified products. The MCAI states:

    An A320 aircraft experienced an event where it was not possible
to open the reinforced cockpit door, even after power had been
removed from the aircraft. Investigation has identified that the
cockpit door latch/striker assembly may have overheated, causing
permanent internal damage prior to being electrically isolated by
the internal thermal fuse. This condition, in case of a rapid
decompression in the cockpit, would prevent the necessary unlocking/
opening of the door, which may lead to failure of the airplane
structure.
    To prevent this, an improved strike package/door bolting system,
including a Polymer Positive Temperature Coefficient (PPTC) element
(overheat protection) was introduced by Airbus Modification 35219 in
production and modification 35218 (Service Bulletin A320-25-1444)
in-service. The PPTC is a resettable thermistor and is installed on
the frame of the electrically-operated cockpit door latch/striker
assembly.
    The in-service implementation of this modification was
originally managed by an Airbus campaign but the rate of
installation by operators has not met the expected timescales,
making mandatory action necessary to address this.
    For the reasons described above, this AD requires the
installation of improved cockpit door latch/striker assemblies.

You may obtain further information by examining the MCAI in the AD
docket.

Relevant Service Information

    Airbus has issued Service Bulletin A320-25-1444, Revision 02, dated
August 1, 2006. The actions described in this service information are
intended to correct the unsafe condition identified in the MCAI.

FAA's Determination and Requirements of This Proposed AD

    This product has been approved by the aviation authority of another
country, and is approved for operation in the United States. Pursuant
to our bilateral agreement with the State of Design Authority, we have
been notified of the unsafe condition described in the MCAI and service
information referenced above. We are proposing this AD because we
evaluated all pertinent information and determined an unsafe condition
exists and is likely to exist or develop on other products of the same
type design.

Differences Between This AD and the MCAI or Service Information

    We have reviewed the MCAI and related service information and, in
general, agree with their substance. But we might have found it
necessary to use different words from those in the MCAI to ensure the
AD is clear for U.S. operators and is enforceable. In making these
changes, we do not intend to differ substantively from the information
provided in the MCAI and related service information.
    We might also have proposed different actions in this AD from those
in the MCAI in order to follow FAA policies. Any such differences are
highlighted in a NOTE within the proposed AD.

Costs of Compliance

    Based on the service information, we estimate that this proposed AD
would affect about 620 products of U.S. registry. We also estimate that
it would take about 6 work-hours per product to comply with the basic
requirements of this proposed AD. The average labor rate is $80 per
work-hour. Required parts would cost about $0 per product. Where the
service information lists required parts costs that are covered under
warranty, we have assumed that there will be no charge for these costs.
As we do not control warranty coverage for affected parties, some
parties may incur costs higher than estimated here. Based on these
figures, we estimate the cost of the proposed AD on U.S. operators to
be $297,600, or $480 per product.

Authority for This Rulemaking

    Title 49 of the United States Code specifies the FAA's authority to
issue rules on aviation safety. Subtitle I, section 106, describes the
authority of the FAA Administrator. ``Subtitle VII: Aviation
Programs,'' describes in more detail the scope of the Agency's
authority.
    We are issuing this rulemaking under the authority described in
``Subtitle VII, Part A, Subpart III, Section 44701: General
requirements.'' Under that section, Congress charges the FAA with
promoting safe flight of civil aircraft in air commerce by prescribing
regulations for practices, methods, and procedures the Administrator
finds necessary for safety in air commerce. This regulation is within
the scope of that authority because it addresses an unsafe condition
that is likely to exist or develop on products identified in this
rulemaking action.

Regulatory Findings

    We determined that this proposed AD would not have federalism
implications under Executive Order 13132. This proposed AD would not
have a substantial direct effect on the States, on the relationship
between the national Government and the States, or on the distribution
of power and responsibilities among the various levels of government.
    For the reasons discussed above, I certify this proposed
regulation:
    1. Is not a ``significant regulatory action'' under Executive Order
12866;
    2. Is not a ``significant rule'' under the DOT Regulatory Policies
and Procedures (44 FR 11034, February 26, 1979); and
    3. Will not have a significant economic impact, positive or
negative, on a substantial number of small entities under the criteria
of the Regulatory Flexibility Act.
    We prepared a regulatory evaluation of the estimated costs to
comply with this proposed AD and placed it in the AD docket.

List of Subjects in 14 CFR Part 39

    Air transportation, Aircraft, Aviation safety, Incorporation by
reference, Safety.

The Proposed Amendment

    Accordingly, under the authority delegated to me by the
Administrator, the FAA proposes to amend 14 CFR part 39 as follows:

PART 39--AIRWORTHINESS DIRECTIVES

    1. The authority citation for part 39 continues to read as follows:

    Authority: 49 U.S.C. 106(g), 40113, 44701.

Sec.  39.13  [Amended]

    2. The FAA amends Sec.  39.13 by adding the following new AD:

Airbus: Docket No. FAA-2008-1327; Directorate Identifier 2008-NM-
161-AD.

Comments Due Date

    (a) We must receive comments by January 22, 2009.

Affected ADs

    (b) None.

Applicability

    (c) This AD applies to Airbus Model A318-111, -112, -121, and -
122; A319-111, -112, -113, -114, -115, -131, -132, and -133; A320-
111, -211, -212, -214, -231, -232, -233; and A321-111, -112, -131, -
211, -212, -213, -231, and -232 series airplanes; certificated in
any category; equipped with a cockpit door latch/striker assembly
having part number AR4714-1 or AR4714-3.

Subject

    (d) Air Transport Association (ATA) of America Code 25:
Equipment/furnishings.

Reason

    (e) The mandatory continuing airworthiness information (MCAI)
states:

    An A320 aircraft experienced an event where it was not possible
to open the reinforced cockpit door, even after power had been
removed from the aircraft. Investigation has identified that the
cockpit door latch/striker assembly may have overheated, causing
permanent internal damage prior to being electrically isolated by
the internal thermal fuse. This condition, in case of a rapid
decompression in the cockpit, would prevent the necessary unlocking/
opening of the door, which may lead to failure of the airplane
structure.
    To prevent this, an improved strike package/door bolting system,
including a Polymer Positive Temperature Coefficient (PPTC) element
(overheat protection) was introduced by Airbus Modification 35219 in
production and modification 35218 (Service Bulletin A320-25-1444)
in-service. The PPTC is a resettable thermistor and is installed on
the frame of the electrically-operated cockpit door latch/striker
assembly.
    The in-service implementation of this modification was
originally managed by an Airbus campaign but the rate of
installation by operators has not met the expected timescales,
making mandatory action necessary to address this.
    For the reasons described above, this AD requires the
installation of improved cockpit door latch/striker assemblies.

Actions and Compliance

    (f) Unless already done, do the following actions.
    (1) Within 8 months after the effective date of this AD: Replace
all cockpit door latch/striker assemblies having part number AR4714-
1 or AR4714-3 with modified units in accordance with Airbus Service
Bulletin A320-25-1444, Revision 02, dated August 1, 2006 (Airbus
Modification 35218).
    (2) Previous accomplishment of the replacement before the
effective date of this AD in accordance with Airbus Service Bulletin
A320-25-1444, dated April 29, 2005, or Revision 01, dated July 19,
2005, meets the requirements of paragraph (f)(1) of this AD.

FAA AD Differences

    Note 1: This AD differs from the MCAI and/or service information
as follows: No differences.

Other FAA AD Provisions

    (g) The following provisions also apply to this AD:
    (1) Alternative Methods of Compliance (AMOCs): The Manager,
International Branch, FAA, has the authority to approve AMOCs for
this AD, if requested using the procedures found in 14 CFR 39.19.
Send information to ATTN: Tim Dulin, Aerospace Engineer,
International Branch, ANM-116, Transport Airplane Directorate, FAA,
1601 Lind Avenue, SW., Renton, Washington

98057-3356; telephone<PHONE_NUMBER>; fax<PHONE_NUMBER>. Before
using any approved AMOC on any airplane to which the AMOC applies,
notify your appropriate principal inspector (PI) in the FAA Flight
Standards District Office (FSDO), or lacking a PI, your local FSDO.
    (2) Airworthy Product: For any requirement in this AD to obtain
corrective actions from a manufacturer or other source, use these
actions if they are FAA-approved. Corrective actions are considered
FAA-approved if they are approved by the State of Design Authority
(or their delegated agent). You are required to assure the product
is airworthy before it is returned to service.
    (3) Reporting Requirements: For any reporting requirement in
this AD, under the provisions of the Paperwork Reduction Act, the
Office of Management and Budget (OMB) has approved the information
collection requirements and has assigned OMB Control Number 2120-
0056.

Related Information

    (h) Refer to MCAI EASA Airworthiness Directive 2008-0151, dated
August 5, 2008, and Airbus Service Bulletin A320-25-1444, Revision
02, dated August 1, 2006, for related information.

    Issued in Renton, WA, on December 12, 2008.
Michael J. Kaszycki,
Acting Manager, Transport Airplane Directorate, Aircraft Certification
Service.
[FR Doc. E8-30478 Filed 12-22-08; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4910-13-P


[Federal Register Volume 80, Number 124 (Monday, June 29, 2015)]
[Notices]
[Pages 37006-37008]
[FR Doc No: 2015-15822]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY

Federal Emergency Management Agency

[Docket ID FEMA-2015-0001; Internal Agency Docket No. FEMA-B-1522]

Changes in Flood Hazard Determinations

AGENCY: Federal Emergency Management Agency, DHS.

ACTION: Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: This notice lists communities where the addition or
modification of Base Flood Elevations (BFEs), base flood depths,
Special Flood Hazard Area (SFHA) boundaries or zone designations, or
the regulatory floodway (hereinafter referred to as flood hazard
determinations), as shown on the Flood Insurance Rate Maps (FIRMs), and
where applicable, in the supporting Flood Insurance Study (FIS)
reports, prepared by the Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA) for
each community, is appropriate because of new scientific or technical
data. The FIRM, and where applicable, portions of the FIS report, have
been revised to reflect these flood hazard determinations through
issuance of a Letter of Map Revision (LOMR), in accordance with Title
44, Part 65 of the Code of Federal Regulations (44 CFR part 65). The
LOMR will be used by insurance agents and others to calculate
appropriate flood insurance premium rates for new buildings and the
contents of those buildings. For rating purposes, the currently
effective community number is shown in the table below and must be used
for all new policies and renewals.

DATES: These flood hazard determinations will become effective on the
dates listed in the table below and revise the FIRM panels and FIS
report in effect prior to this determination for the listed
communities.
    From the date of the second publication of notification of these
changes in a newspaper of local circulation, any person has 90 days in
which to request through the community that the Deputy Associate
Administrator for Mitigation reconsider the changes. The flood hazard
determination information may be changed during the 90-day period.

ADDRESSES: The affected communities are listed in the table below.
Revised flood hazard information for each community is available for
inspection at both the online location and the respective community map
repository address listed in the table below. Additionally, the current
effective FIRM and FIS report for each community are accessible online
through the FEMA Map Service Center at www.msc.fema.gov for comparison.
    Submit comments and/or appeals to the Chief Executive Officer of
the community as listed in the table below.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Luis Rodriguez, Chief, Engineering
Management Branch, Federal Insurance and Mitigation Administration,
FEMA, 500 C Street SW., Washington, DC 20472,<PHONE_NUMBER>, or
(email<EMAIL_ADDRESS>or visit the FEMA Map Information
eXchange (FMIX) online at www.floodmaps.fema.gov/fhm/fmx_main.html.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The specific flood hazard determinations are
not described for each community in this notice. However, the online
location and local community map repository address where the flood
hazard determination information is available for inspection is
provided.
    Any request for reconsideration of flood hazard determinations must
be submitted to the Chief Executive Officer of the community as listed
in the table below.
    The modifications are made pursuant to section 201 of the Flood
Disaster Protection Act of 1973, 42 U.S.C. 4105, and are in accordance
with the National Flood Insurance Act of 1968, 42 U.S.C. 4001 et seq.,
and with 44 CFR part 65.
    The FIRM and FIS report are the basis of the floodplain management
measures that the community is required either to adopt or to show
evidence of having in effect in order to qualify or remain qualified
for participation in the National Flood Insurance Program (NFIP).
    These flood hazard determinations, together with the floodplain
management criteria required by 44 CFR 60.3, are the minimum that are
required. They should not be construed to mean that the community must
change any existing ordinances that are more stringent in their
floodplain management requirements. The community may at any time enact
stricter requirements of its own or pursuant to policies established by
other Federal, State, or regional entities. The flood hazard
determinations are in accordance with 44 CFR 65.4.
    The affected communities are listed in the following table. Flood
hazard determination information for each community is available for
inspection at both the online location and the respective community map
repository address listed in the table below. Additionally, the current
effective FIRM and FIS report for each community are accessible online
through the FEMA Map Service Center at www.msc.fema.gov for comparison.

(Catalog of Federal Domestic Assistance No. 97.022, ``Flood
Insurance.'')

    Dated: June 16, 2015.
Roy E. Wright,
Deputy Associate Administrator for Insurance and Mitigation, Department
of Homeland Security, Federal Emergency Management Agency.

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
                                                         Chief executive                         Online location of
        State and county           Location and case       officer of         Community map        letter of map        Effective date of     Community
                                          No.               community          repository             revision             modification          No.
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Florida:
    Bay.........................  Unincorporated       The Honorable       Bay County          http://                August 24, 2015......       120004
                                   areas of Bay         Robert Majka,       Government          www.msc.fema.gov/
                                   County (15-04-       Jr., Bay County     Offices, 707        lomc.
                                   1287P).              Manager, 840 West   Jenks Avenue,
                                                        11th Street,        Suite B, Panama
                                                        Panama City, FL     City, FL 32401.
                                                        32401.

    Charlotte...................  Unincorporated       The Honorable Bill  Charlotte County    http://                August 24, 2015......       120061
                                   areas of Charlotte   Truex, Chairman,    Community           www.msc.fema.gov/
                                   County (15-04-       Charlotte County    Development         lomc.
                                   3689P).              Board of            Department, 18500
                                                        Commissioners,      Murdock Circle,
                                                        18500 Murdock       Port Charlotte,
                                                        Circle, Port        FL 33948.
                                                        Charlotte, FL
                                                        33948.
    Collier.....................  City of Naples (15-  The Honorable John  City Hall, 735      http://                August 24, 2015......       125130
                                   04-4054P).           Sorrey, III, 735    Eighth Street       www.msc.fema.gov/
                                                        Eighth Street       South, Naples, FL   lomc.
                                                        South, Naples, FL   34102.
                                                        34102.
    Lee.........................  Unincorporated       The Honorable       Lee County          http://                August 20, 2015......       125124
                                   areas of Lee         Brian Hamman,       Community           www.msc.fema.gov/
                                   County (14-04-       Chairman, Lee       Development         lomc.
                                   5866P).              County, Board of    Department, 1500
                                                        Commissioners,      Monroe Street,
                                                        P.O. Box 398,       2nd Floor, Fort
                                                        Fort Myers, FL      Myers, FL 33901.
                                                        33902.
    Monroe......................  City of Key West     The Honorable       Planning            http://                August 24, 2015......       120168
                                   (15-04-1481P).       Craig Cates,        Department, 605A    www.msc.fema.gov/
                                                        Mayor, City of      Simonton Street,    lomc.
                                                        Key West, 3126      Key West, FL
                                                        Flagler Avenue,     33040.
                                                        Key West, FL
                                                        33040.
    Monroe......................  Unincorporated       The Honorable       Department of       http://                August 21, 2015......       125129
                                   Areas of Monroe      Danny Kolhage,      Planning &          www.msc.fema.gov/
                                   County (15-04-       Mayor, Monroe       Environmental       lomc.
                                   2314P).              County, 1100        Resources, 2798
                                                        Simonton Street,    Overseas Highway,
                                                        Key West, FL        Marathon, FL
                                                        33040.              33050.
    Monroe......................  Unincorporated       The Honorable       Department of       http://                August 24, 2015......       125129
                                   Areas of Monroe      Danny Kolhage,      Planning &          www.msc.fema.gov/
                                   County (15-04-       Mayor, Monroe       Environmental       lomc.
                                   2332P).              County, 1100        Resources, 2798
                                                        Simonton Street,    Overseas Highway,
                                                        Key West, FL        Marathon, FL
                                                        33040.              33050.
    Monroe......................  Unincorporated       The Honorable       Department of       http://                August 24, 2015......       125129
                                   Areas of Monroe      Danny Kolhage,      Planning &          www.msc.fema.gov/
                                   County (15-04-       Mayor, Monroe       Environmental       lomc.
                                   2377P).              County, 1100        Resources, 2798
                                                        Simonton Street,    Overseas Highway,
                                                        Key West, FL        Marathon, FL
                                                        33040.              33050.
    Monroe......................  Unincorporated       The Honorable       Department of       http://                August 24, 2015......       125129
                                   Areas of Monroe      Danny Kolhage,      Planning &          www.msc.fema.gov/
                                   County (15-04-       Mayor, Monroe       Environmental       lomc.
                                   2859P).              County, 1100        Resources, 2798
                                                        Simonton Street,    Overseas Highway,
                                                        Key West, FL        Marathon, FL
                                                        33040.              33050.
    Orange......................  City of Orlando (15- The Honorable       City Hall, 400      http://                August 24, 2015......       120186
                                   04-1669P).           Buddy Dyer,         South Orange        www.msc.fema.gov/
                                                        Mayor, City of      Avenue, Orlando,    lomc.
                                                        Orlando, City       FL 32802.
                                                        Hall, 400 South
                                                        Orange Avenue,
                                                        Orlando, FL 32802.
    Orange......................  City of Orlando (15- The Honorable       City Hall, 400      http://                August 24, 2015......       120186
                                   04-4657X).           Buddy Dyer,         South Orange        www.msc.fema.gov/
                                                        Mayor, City of      Avenue, Orlando,    lomc.
                                                        Orlando, City       FL 32802.
                                                        Hall, 400 South
                                                        Orange Avenue,
                                                        Orlando, FL 32802.
    St. Johns...................  Unincorporated       The Honorable       Administration      http://                August 25, 2015......       125147
                                   areas of St. Johns   Rachael L.          Building, 4040      www.msc.fema.gov/
                                   County (15-04-       Bennett, Chair,     Lewis Speedway,     lomc.
                                   2346P).              St. Johns County    St. Augustine, FL
                                                        Board of            32084.
                                                        Commissioners,
                                                        500 San Sebastian
                                                        View, St.
                                                        Augustine, FL
                                                        32084.
South Carolina: Oconee..........  Unincorporated       Mr. T. Scott        Oconee County       http://                August 21, 2015......       450157
                                   areas of Oconee      Moulder, Oconee     Administrator,      www.msc.fema.gov/
                                   County (15-04-       County              415 South Pine      lomc.
                                   2201P).              Administrator,      Street, Walhalla,
                                                        415 South Pine      SC 29691.
                                                        Street, Walhalla,
                                                        SC 29691.
Texas:
    Dallas......................  City of Carrollton   Mr. Leonard         Engineering         http://                August 24, 2015......       480167
                                   (15-06-1351P).       Martin, Manager,    Department, 1945    www.msc.fema.gov/
                                                        City of             East Jackson        lomc.
                                                        Carrollton, 1945    Road, Carrollton,
                                                        East Jackson        TX 75006.
                                                        Road, Carrollton,
                                                        TX 75006.
    Harris......................  Unincorporated       The Honorable       Harris County       http://                August 26, 2015......       480287
                                   areas of Harris      Edward M. Emmett,   Permit Office,      www.msc.fema.gov/
                                   County (15-06-       Harris County       10555 Northwest     lomc.
                                   0175P).              Judge, 1001         Freeway, Suite
                                                        Preston Street,     120, Houston, TX
                                                        Suite 911,          77092.
                                                        Houston, TX 77002.
    Tarrant.....................  City of Fort Worth   The Honorable       City Hall, 1000     http://                August 3, 2015.......       480596
                                   (14-06-3506P).       Betsy Price,        Throckmorton        www.msc.fema.gov/
                                                        Mayor, City of      Street, Fort        lomc.
                                                        Fort Worth, 1000    Worth, TX 76102.
                                                        Throckmorton
                                                        Street, Fort
                                                        Worth, TX 76102.

    Walker......................  City of Huntsville   The Honorable Mac   Engineering         http://                August 27, 2015......       480639
                                   (14-06-3819P).       Woodward, Mayor,    Department, 448     www.msc.fema.gov/
                                                        City of             State Highway 75    lomc.
                                                        Huntsville, 1212    North,
                                                        Avenue M,           Huntsville, TX
                                                        Huntsville, TX      77340.
                                                        77340.
Utah:
    Salt Lake...................  City of West Jordan  The Honorable Kim   City Hall, 8000     http://                August 24, 2015......       490108
                                   (14-08-1329P).       V. Rolfe, Mayor,    South Redwood       www.msc.fema.gov/
                                                        City of West        Road, West          lomc.
                                                        Jordan, 8000        Jordan, UT 84088.
                                                        South Redwood
                                                        Road, West
                                                        Jordan, UT 84088.
    Weber.......................  City of North Ogden  The Honorable       City Hall, 505      http://                August 24, 2015......       490214
                                   (14-08-1297P).       Brent Taylor,       East 2600 North,    www.msc.fema.gov/
                                                        Mayor, City of      North Ogden, UT     lomc.
                                                        North Ogden, 505    84414.
                                                        East 2600 North,
                                                        North Ogden, UT
                                                        84414.
    Weber.......................  Unincorporated       The Honorable       Weber County        http://                August 24, 2015......       490187
                                   areas of Weber       Kerry Gibson,       Government          www.msc.fema.gov/
                                   County (14-08-       Chairman, Weber     Building, 2380      lomc.
                                   1297P).              County              Washington
                                                        Commission, 2380    Boulevard, Ogden,
                                                        Washington          UT 84401.
                                                        Boulevard, Suite
                                                        360, Ogden, UT
                                                        84401.
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

[FR Doc. 2015-15822 Filed 6-26-15; 8:45 am]
 BILLING CODE 9110-12-P