[Federal Register Volume 79, Number 242 (Wednesday, December 17, 2014)]
[Notices]
[Pages 75143-75144]
[FR Doc No: 2014-29536]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission

[Docket No. CD15-8-000]

Imperial Irrigation District; Notice of Preliminary Determination
of a Qualifying Conduit Hydropower Facility and Soliciting Comments and
Motions To Intervene

    On November 26, 2014, the Imperial Irrigation District filed a
notice of intent to construct a qualifying conduit hydropower facility,
pursuant to section 30 of the Federal Power Act (FPA), as amended by
section 4 of the Hydropower Regulatory Efficiency Act of 2013 (HREA).
The proposed Check 4 on Central Main Canal In-Conduit Hydroelectric
Project would have an installed capacity of 315 kilowatts (kW) and
would be located on the existing Central Main Canal. This conduit
transports water for irrigation, municipal, and industrial purposes.
The project would be located near the city of Brawley in Imperial
County, California.
    Applicant Contact: Carl Stills, 1651 West Main Street, El Centro,
CA 92243, Phone No.<PHONE_NUMBER>.
    FERC Contact: Robert Bell, Phone No.<PHONE_NUMBER>, email:
<EMAIL_ADDRESS>    Qualifying Conduit Hydropower Facility Description: The proposed

project would consist of: (1) One proposed 27.6-foot-long, 10-foot-wide
open concrete canal intake structure with one 10-foot wide gate; (2) a
proposed 15- by 25-foot powerhouse containing the turbine generator
unit with an installed capacity of 315 kW; (3) the proposed 125-foot-
long, 12-foot-wide concrete box tailrace structure which returns the
water into the Central Main Canal; and (4) appurtenant facilities. The
proposed project would have an estimated annual generating capacity of
1,613 megawatt-hours.
    A qualifying conduit hydropower facility is one that is determined
or deemed to meet all of the criteria shown in the table below.

      Table 1--Criteria for Qualifying Conduit Hydropower Facility
------------------------------------------------------------------------
                                                              Satisfies
       Statutory provision                Description           (Y/N)
------------------------------------------------------------------------
FPA 30(a)(3)(A), as amended by     The conduit the facility           Y
 HREA.                              uses is a tunnel,
                                    canal, pipeline,
                                    aqueduct, flume, ditch,
                                    or similar manmade
                                    water conveyance that
                                    is operated for the
                                    distribution of water
                                    for agricultural,
                                    municipal, or
                                    industrial consumption
                                    and not primarily for
                                    the generation of
                                    electricity.
FPA 30(a)(3)(C)(i), as amended by  The facility is                    Y
 HREA.                              constructed, operated,
                                    or maintained for the
                                    generation of electric
                                    power and uses for such
                                    generation only the
                                    hydroelectric potential
                                    of a non-federally
                                    owned conduit.
FPA 30(a)(3)(C)(ii), as amended    The facility has an                Y
 by HREA.                           installed capacity that
                                    does not exceed 5
                                    megawatts.
FPA 30(a)(3)(C)(iii), as amended   On or before August 9,             Y
 by HREA.                           2013, the facility is
                                    not licensed, or
                                    exempted from the
                                    licensing requirements
                                    of Part I of the FPA.
------------------------------------------------------------------------

    Preliminary Determination: Based upon the above criteria,
Commission staff preliminarily determines that the proposal satisfies
the requirements for a qualifying conduit hydropower facility, which is
not required to be licensed or exempted from licensing.
    Comments and Motions to Intervene: Deadline for filing comments
contesting whether the facility meets the qualifying criteria is 45
days from the issuance date of this notice.
    Deadline for filing motions to intervene is 30 days from the
issuance date of this notice.
    Anyone may submit comments or a motion to intervene in accordance
with the requirements of Rules of Practice and Procedure, 18 CFR
385.210 and 385.214. Any motions to intervene must be received on or
before the specified deadline date for the particular proceeding.
    Filing and Service of Responsive Documents: All filings must (1)
bear in all capital letters the ``COMMENTS CONTESTING QUALIFICATION FOR
A CONDUIT HYDROPOWER FACILITY'' or ``MOTION TO INTERVENE,'' as
applicable; (2) state in the heading the name of the applicant and the
project number of the application to which the filing responds; (3)
state the name, address, and telephone number of the person filing; and
(4) otherwise comply with the requirements of sections 385.2001 through
385.2005 of the Commission's regulations.\1\ All comments contesting
Commission staff's preliminary determination that the facility meets
the qualifying criteria must set forth their evidentiary basis.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \1\ 18 CFR 385.2001-2005 (2014).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    The Commission strongly encourages electronic filing. Please file
motions to intervene and comments using the Commission's eFiling system
at http://www.ferc.gov/docs-filing/efiling.asp. Commenters can submit
brief comments up to 6,000 characters, without prior registration,
using the eComment system at http://www.ferc.gov/docs-filing/ecomment.asp. You must include your name and contact information at the
end of your comments. For assistance, please contact FERC Online
Support at<EMAIL_ADDRESS>(866) 208-3676 (toll free), or
(202) 502-8659 (TTY). In lieu of electronic filing, please send a paper
copy to: Secretary, Federal Energy Regulatory Commission, 888 First
Street NE., Washington, DC 20426. A copy of all other filings in
reference to this application must be accompanied by proof of service
on all persons listed in the service list prepared by the Commission in
this proceeding, in accordance with 18 CFR 4.34(b) and 385.2010.
    Locations of Notice of Intent: Copies of the notice of intent can
be obtained directly from the applicant or such copies can be viewed
and reproduced at the Commission in its Public Reference Room, Room 2A,
888 First Street NE., Washington, DC 20426. The filing may also be
viewed on the web at http://www.ferc.gov/docs-filing/elibrary.asp using
the ``eLibrary'' link. Enter the docket number (e.g., CD15-8-000) in
the docket number field to access the document. For assistance, call
toll-free 1-866-208-3676 or email<EMAIL_ADDRESS>For TTY,
call<PHONE_NUMBER>.

    Dated: December 10, 2014.
Kimberly D. Bose,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2014-29536 Filed 12-16-14; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6717-01-P


[Federal Register Volume 78, Number 209 (Tuesday, October 29, 2013)]
[Proposed Rules]
[Pages 64415-64417]
[FR Doc No: 2013-25398]

=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION

Federal Aviation Administration

14 CFR part 25

[Docket No. FAA-2013-0890; Notice No. 25-13-10-SC]

Special Conditions: Airbus, Model A350-900 Series Airplane;
Ground Pivoting Loads

AGENCY: Federal Aviation Administration (FAA), DOT.

ACTION: Notice of proposed special conditions.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: This action proposes special conditions for Airbus Model A350-
900 series airplanes. These airplanes will have a novel or unusual
design feature(s) associated with a braking system that affects the
airplane's pivoting behavior. The applicable airworthiness regulations
do not contain adequate or appropriate safety standards for this design
feature. These proposed special conditions contain the additional
safety standards that the Administrator considers necessary to
establish a level of safety equivalent to

that established by the existing airworthiness standards.

DATES: Send your comments on or before December 13, 2013.

ADDRESSES: Send comments identified by docket number FAA-2013-0890
using any of the following methods:
     Federal eRegulations Portal: Go to http://www.regulations.gov/ and follow the online instructions for sending
your comments electronically.
     Mail: Send comments to Docket Operations, M-30, U.S.
Department of Transportation (DOT), 1200 New Jersey Avenue SE., Room
W12-140, West Building Ground Floor, Washington, DC 20590-0001.
     Hand Delivery or Courier: Take comments to Docket
Operations in Room W12-140 of the West Building Ground Floor at 1200
New Jersey Avenue SE., Washington, DC, between 9 a.m. and 5 p.m.,
Monday through Friday, except federal holidays.
     Fax: Fax comments to Docket Operations at<PHONE_NUMBER>.
    Privacy: The FAA will post all comments it receives, without
change, to http://www.regulations.gov/, including any personal
information the commenter provides. Using the search function of the
docket Web site, anyone can find and read the electronic form of all
comments received into any FAA docket, including the name of the
individual sending the comment (or signing the comment for an
association, business, labor union, etc.). DOT's complete Privacy Act
Statement can be found in the Federal Register published on April 11,
2000 (65 FR 19477-19478), as well as at http://DocketsInfo.dot .gov/.
    Docket: Background documents or comments received may be read at
http://www.regulations.gov/ at any time. Follow the online
instructions for accessing the docket or go to the Docket Operations in
Room W12-140 of the West Building Ground Floor at 1200 New Jersey
Avenue SE., Washington, DC, between 9 a.m. and 5 p.m., Monday through
Friday, except federal holidays.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Todd Martin, FAA, Airframe/Cabin
Safety, ANM-115, Transport Airplane Directorate, Aircraft Certification
Service, 1601 Lind Avenue SW., Renton, Washington, 98057-3356;
telephone<PHONE_NUMBER>; facsimile<PHONE_NUMBER>.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

Comments Invited

    We invite interested people to take part in this rulemaking by
sending written comments, data, or views. The most helpful comments
reference a specific portion of the proposed special conditions,
explain the reason for any recommended change, and include supporting
data. We ask that you send us two copies of written comments.
    We will consider all comments we receive on or before the closing
date for comments. We may change these special conditions based on the
comments we receive.

Background

    On August 25, 2008, Airbus applied for a type certificate for their
new Model A350-900 series airplane. Later, Airbus requested and the FAA
approved an extension to the application for FAA type certification to
June 28, 2009. The Model A350-900 series airplane has a conventional
layout with twin wing-mounted Rolls-Royce Trent engines. It features a
twin aisle 9-abreast economy class layout, and accommodates side-by-
side placement of LD-3 containers in the cargo compartment. The basic
Model A350-900 series configuration will accommodate 315 passengers in
a standard two-class arrangement. The design cruise speed is Mach 0.85
with a Maximum Take-Off Weight of 602,000 lbs. Airbus proposes the
Model A350-900 series airplane to be certified for extended operations
(ETOPS) beyond 180 minutes at entry into service for up to a 420-minute
maximum diversion time.
    The Airbus Model A350-900 series airplane is equipped with a
braking system that affects the airplane's pivoting behavior. During
pivoting the braking system inhibits braking on some wheels. Title 14
Code of Federal Regulations (14 CFR) 25.503 and European Aviation
Safety Agency (EASA) Certification Specification (CS) section 25.503,
each specify limit loads due to pivoting, however, system effects are
not taken into account.

Type Certification Basis

    Under Title 14, Code of Federal Regulations (14 CFR) 21.17, Airbus
must show that the Model A350-900 series meets the applicable
provisions of 14 CFR part 25, as amended by Amendments 25-1 through 25-
128.
    If the Administrator finds that the applicable airworthiness
regulations (i.e., 14 CFR part 25) do not contain adequate or
appropriate safety standards for the Model A350-900 series because of a
novel or unusual design feature, special conditions are prescribed
under Sec.  21.16.
    Special conditions are initially applicable to the model for which
they are issued. Should the type certificate for that model be amended
later to include any other model that incorporates the same or similar
novel or unusual design feature, the proposed special conditions would
also apply to the other model under Sec.  21.101.
    In addition to the applicable airworthiness regulations and
proposed special conditions, the Model A350-900 series must comply with
the fuel vent and exhaust emission requirements of 14 CFR part 34 and
the noise certification requirements of 14 CFR part 36 and the FAA must
issue a finding of regulatory adequacy under Sec.  611 of Public Law
92-574, the ``Noise Control Act of 1972.''
    The FAA issues special conditions, as defined in 14 CFR 11.19,
under Sec.  11.38, and they become part of the type-certification basis
under Sec.  21.17(a)(2).

Novel or Unusual Design Features

    The Airbus Model A350-900 series airplane will incorporate the
following novel or unusual design features: a braking system that
affects the airplane's pivoting behavior.

Discussion

    Within the Aviation Rulemaking Advisory Committee, the Loads and
Dynamics Harmonization Working Group developed criteria for determining
pivoting loads. The group recommended, for airplanes with more than two
main landing gear units, a rational pivoting maneuver that takes into
account the effects of the braking system and tire characteristics, in
lieu of the current requirement. Although the Airbus Model A350-900
series airplane has two main landing gear units, EASA and the FAA
propose to apply the same criteria on this airplane.

Applicability

    As discussed above, these proposed special conditions apply to
Airbus Model A350-900 series airplanes. Should Airbus apply later for a
change to the type certificate to include another model incorporating
the same novel or unusual design feature, the proposed special
conditions would apply to that model as well.

Conclusion

    This action affects only certain novel or unusual design features
on the Airbus Model A350-900 series airplanes. It is not a rule of
general applicability.

List of Subjects in 14 CFR part 25

    Aircraft, Aviation safety, Reporting and recordkeeping
requirements.

    The authority citation for these special conditions is as follows:

    Authority: 49 U.S.C. 106(g), 40113, 44701, 44702, 44704.

The Proposed Special Conditions

    Accordingly, the Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) proposes the
following special conditions as part of the type certification basis
for Airbus Model A350-900 series airplanes in lieu of Sec.  25.503:
    1. The main landing gear and supporting structure must be designed
for the loads induced by pivoting during ground maneuvers.
    (a) The following rational pivoting maneuvers must be considered:
    (i) Towing at the nose gear at the critical towing angle with no
brakes applied, including cases with torque links disconnected; and
separately,
    (ii) Application of symmetrical or unsymmetrical forward thrust to
aid pivoting, with or without braking by pilot action on the pedals.
    (b) The airplane is assumed to be in static equilibrium, with the
loads being applied at the ground contact points.
    (c) The limit vertical load factor must be 1.0, and:
    (i) For wheels with brakes applied, the coefficient of friction
must be 0.8,
    (ii) For wheels with brakes not applied, the ground tire reactions
must be based on reliable tire data.

    Issued in Renton, Washington, on September 12, 2013.
Jeffrey E. Duven,
Acting Manager, Transport Airplane Directorate, Aircraft Certification
Service.
[FR Doc. 2013-25398 Filed 10-28-13; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910-13-P


[Federal Register Volume 78, Number 152 (Wednesday, August 7, 2013)]
[Proposed Rules]
[Pages 48085-48087]
[FR Doc No: 2013-19104]

=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY

Coast Guard

33 CFR Part 165

[Docket No. USCG-2012-1069]
RIN 1625-AA00

Safety Zones; Chelsea River, Boston Inner Harbor, Boston, MA

AGENCY: Coast Guard, DHS.

ACTION: Notice of proposed rulemaking.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Coast Guard proposes to disestablish the existing Safety
Zone for the Chelsea River, Boston Inner Harbor, Boston, MA. Since the
implementation of the regulation, physical changes have occurred within
the confines of the safety zone, making the provisions of the safety
zone no longer applicable.

DATES: Comments and related material must be received by the Coast
Guard on or before September 6, 2013. Requests for public meetings must
be received by the Coast Guard on or before August 28, 2013.

ADDRESSES: You may submit comments identified by docket number USCG-
2012-1069 using any one of the following methods:
    (1) Federal eRulemaking Portal: http://www.regulations.gov.
    (2) Fax:<PHONE_NUMBER>.
    (3) Mail: Docket Management Facility (M-30), U.S. Department of
Transportation, West Building Ground Floor, Room W12-140, 1200 New
Jersey Avenue SE., Washington, DC 20590-0001.
    (4) Hand delivery: Same as mail address above, between 9 a.m. and 5
p.m., Monday through Friday, except Federal holidays. The telephone
number is<PHONE_NUMBER>.
    To avoid duplication, please use only one of these four methods.
See the ``Public Participation and Request for Comments'' portion of
the SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION section below for instructions on
submitting comments.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: If you have questions on this rule,
call or email Mr. Mark Cutter, Coast Guard Sector Boston Waterways
Management Division, telephone<PHONE_NUMBER>, email
<EMAIL_ADDRESS>If you have questions on viewing or submitting
material to the docket, call Barbara Hairston, Program Manager, Docket
Operations, telephone<PHONE_NUMBER>.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

Table of Acronyms

DHS Department of Homeland Security
FR Federal Register
NPRM Notice of Proposed Rulemaking
COTP Captain of the Port

A. Public Participation and Request for Comments

    We encourage you to participate in this rulemaking by submitting
comments and related materials. All comments received will be posted
without change to http://www.regulations.gov and will include any
personal information you have provided.

1. Submitting Comments

    If you submit a comment, please include the docket number for this
rulemaking (USCG-2012-1069), indicate the specific section of this
document to which each comment applies, and provide a reason for each
suggestion or recommendation. You may submit your comments and material
online at via http://www.regulations.gov, or by fax, mail, or hand
delivery, but please use only one of these means. If you submit a
comment online, it will be considered received by the Coast Guard when
you successfully transmit the comment. If you fax, hand deliver, or
mail your comment, it will be considered as having been received by the
Coast Guard when it is received at the Docket Management Facility. We
recommend that you include your name and a mailing address, an email
address, or a telephone number in the body of your document so that we
can contact you if we have questions regarding your submission.
    To submit your comment online, go to http://www.regulations.gov,
type the docket number (USCG-2012-1069) in the ``SEARCH'' box and click
``SEARCH.'' Click on the ``Submit a Comment'' on the line associated
with this rulemaking.
    If you submit your comments by mail or hand delivery, submit them
in an unbound format, no larger than 8\1/2\ by 11 inches, suitable for
copying and electronic filing. If you submit comments by mail and would
like to know that they reached the Facility, please enclose a stamped,
self-addressed postcard or envelope. We will consider all comments and
material received during the comment period and may change the rule
based on your comments.

2. Viewing Comments and Documents

    To view comments, as well as documents mentioned in this preamble
as being available in the docket, go to http://www.regulations.gov,
type the docket number (USCG-2012-1069) in the ``SEARCH'' box and click
``SEARCH.'' Click on Open Docket Folder on the line associated with
this rulemaking. You may also visit the Docket Management Facility in
Room W12-140 on the ground floor of the Department of Transportation
West Building, 1200 New Jersey Avenue SE., Washington, DC 20590,
between 9 a.m. and 5 p.m., Monday through Friday, except Federal
holidays.

3. Privacy Act

    Anyone can search the electronic form of comments received into any
of our dockets by the name of the individual submitting the comment (or
signing the comment, if submitted on behalf of an association,
business, labor union, etc.). You may review a Privacy Act notice
regarding our public dockets in the January 17, 2008, issue of the
Federal Register (73 FR 3316).

4. Public Meeting

    The Coast Guard does not currently plan to hold public meetings.
However, a public meeting may be requested by using one of the four
methods specified under ADDRESSES. Please explain why you believe a
public meeting would be beneficial. If we determine that one would aid
this rulemaking, we will hold

one at a time and place announced by a later notice in the Federal
Register.

B. Regulatory History and Information

    On Thursday, January 31, 2013, the Coast Guard published an Advance
notice of proposed rulemaking (ANPRM) in the Federal Register (78 FR
6782). The USCG received three written comments in response to this
ANPRM. Also, the USCG held two public meetings in which verbal comments
were received. The minutes of these public meetings are available in
the docket. On the whole, the written and verbal comments received
support the disestablishment of 33 CFR 165.120 and its safety zone.
Moreover, no comment was received in favor of keeping this safety zone.
The Coast Guard considered all comments when crafting this proposed
rule.

C. Basis and Purpose

    The legal basis for the proposed rule is 33 U.S.C. 1231, 1233; 46
U.S.C. Chapter 701, 3306, 3703; 50 U.S.C. 191, 195; 33 CFR 1.05-1, and
160.5; Public Law 107-295, 116 Stat. 2064; and Department of Homeland
Security Delegation No. 0170.1, which collectively authorize the Coast
Guard to define regulatory safety zones.
    The original Chelsea Street Bridge was a bascule-type bridge owned
by the City of Boston and constructed in 1939. It spanned the Chelsea
River providing a means for vehicles to travel between Chelsea, MA and
East Boston, MA. Several petroleum-product transfer facilities are
located on the Chelsea River, upstream and downstream of the Chelsea
Street Bridge. Transit of tank vessels through the bridge is necessary
to access the petroleum facilities upstream of the bridge. The narrow,
ninety-six foot horizontal span created a narrow passage through the
bridge for larger vessels. Adding to the difficulty is the close
proximity of neighboring shore structures and, at times, vessels moored
at the Sunoco Logistics facility downstream of the bridge on the East
Boston side. These factors led to the establishment of the present
safety zone regulation which restricts the passage of certain vessels
through the Chelsea Street Bridge based on vessel dimensional criteria,
assist tug support, and daylight restrictions.
    Since the implementation of the regulations, physical changes have
occurred within the confines of the safety zone. A new vertical lift
span bridge with a 175-foot vertical clearance and a 175-foot
horizontal navigable channel span has been constructed in place of the
old Chelsea Street Bridge. The federal navigational channel has been
expanded to a width of 175 feet. Six new permanent fixed lighted aids
to navigation structures have been installed in the immediate area of
the bridge to best mark the new channel.

D. Comments and Discussion of Proposed Rule

    The three written comments received in the docket were all in favor
of disestablishing the safety zone. Two of those written comments were
from the Boston Harbor Pilots Association and there was one joint
comment from the three oil terminals up river of the safety zone;
Global Partners LP, Gulf Oil Limited Partnership, and Irving Oil
Terminals Inc. All the verbal comments received in the public meetings
were in favor of disestablishing the safety zone. These comments can be
seen in the docket under meeting minutes.
    For all of the reasons discussed above, the Coast Guard proposes to
disestablish the safety zone contained in 33 CFR 165.120, Safety Zone:
Chelsea River, Boston Inner Harbor, Boston, MA by removing that section
completely.

E. Regulatory Analyses

    We developed this proposed rule after considering numerous statutes
and executive orders related to rulemaking. Below we summarize our
analyses based on these statutes or executive orders.

1. Regulatory Planning and Review

    This proposed rule is not a significant regulatory action under
section 3(f) of Executive Order 12866, Regulatory Planning and Review,
as supplemented by Executive Order 13563, and does not require an
assessment of potential costs and benefits under section 6(a)(3) of
that Order. The Office of Management and Budget has not reviewed it
under that Order. We expect the economic impact of this rule to be
minimal because removing this safety zone would lessen the restriction
on vessels transiting this area.

2. Impact on Small Entities

    The Regulatory Flexibility Act of 1980 (RFA), 5 U.S.C. 601-612, as
amended, requires federal agencies to consider the potential impact of
regulations on small entities during rulemaking. The term ``small
entities'' comprises small businesses, not-for-profit organizations
that are independently owned and operated and are not dominant in their
fields, and governmental jurisdictions with populations of less than
50,000. The Coast Guard certifies under 5 U.S.C. 605(b) that this
proposed rule will not have a significant economic impact on a
substantial number of small entities.
    This proposed rule would affect the following entities, some of
which may be small entities: vessel owners and operators in the
affected waterway.
    The proposed rule would not have a significant impact on a
substantial number of small entities because, as mentioned in the
Regulatory Planning and Review section, it proposes to entirely remove
33 CFR 165.120 and its safety zone and thus, lessen the restriction on
vessels transiting in the affected area.
    If you think that your business, organization, or governmental
jurisdiction qualifies as a small entity and that this rule would have
a significant economic impact on it, please submit a comment (see
ADDRESSES) explaining why you think it qualifies and how and to what
degree this rule would economically affect it.

3. Assistance for Small Entities

    Under section 213(a) of the Small Business Regulatory Enforcement
Fairness Act of 1996 (Pub. L. 104-121), we want to assist small
entities in understanding this proposed rule so that. If the rule would
affect your small business, organization, or governmental jurisdiction
and you have questions concerning its provisions or options for
compliance, please contact the person listed under FOR FURTHER
INFORMATION CONTACT. The Coast Guard will not retaliate against small
entities that question or complain about this proposed rule or any
policy or action of the Coast Guard.

4. Collection of Information

    This proposed rule would call for no new collection of information
under the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 (44 U.S.C. 3501-3520.).

5. Federalism

    A rule has implications for federalism under Executive Order 13132,
Federalism, if it has a substantial direct effect on the States, on the
relationship between the national government and the States, or on the
distribution of power and responsibilities among the various levels of
government. We have analyzed this proposed rule under that Order and
determined that this rule does not have implications for federalism.

6. Protest Activities

    The Coast Guard respects the First Amendment rights of protesters.
Protesters are asked to contact the person listed in the FOR FURTHER
INFORMATION CONTACT section to coordinate protest activities so that
your message can be received without

jeopardizing the safety or security of people, places or vessels.

7. Unfunded Mandates Reform Act

    The Unfunded Mandates Reform Act of 1995 (2 U.S.C. 1531-1538)
requires Federal agencies to assess the effects of their discretionary
regulatory actions. In particular, the Act addresses actions that may
result in the expenditure by a State, local, or tribal government, in
the aggregate, or by the private sector of $100,000,000 (adjusted for
inflation) or more in any one year. Though this proposed rule would not
result in such an expenditure, we do discuss the effects of this rule
elsewhere in this preamble.

8. Taking of Private Property

    This proposed rule would not cause a taking of private property or
otherwise have taking implications under Executive Order 12630,
Governmental Actions and Interference with Constitutionally Protected
Property Rights.

9. Civil Justice Reform

    This proposed rule meets applicable standards in sections 3(a) and
3(b)(2) of Executive Order 12988, Civil Justice Reform, to minimize
litigation, eliminate ambiguity, and reduce burden.

10. Protection of Children From Environmental Health Risks

    We have analyzed this proposed rule under Executive Order 13045,
Protection of Children from Environmental Health Risks and Safety
Risks. This rule is not an economically significant rule and would not
create an environmental risk to health or risk to safety that might
disproportionately affect children.

11. Indian Tribal Governments

    This proposed rule does not have tribal implications under
Executive Order 13175, Consultation and Coordination with Indian Tribal
Governments, because it would not have a substantial direct effect on
one or more Indian tribes, on the relationship between the Federal
Government and Indian tribes, or on the distribution of power and
responsibilities between the Federal Government and Indian tribes.

12. Energy Effects

    We have analyzed this proposed rule under Executive Order 13211,
Actions Concerning Regulations That Significantly Affect Energy Supply,
Distribution, or Use.

13. Technical Standards

    This proposed rule does not use technical standards. Therefore, we
did not consider the use of voluntary consensus standards.

14. Environment

    We have analyzed this proposed rule under Department of Homeland
Security Management Directive 023-01 and Commandant Instruction
M16475.lD, which guide the Coast Guard in complying with the National
Environmental Policy Act of 1969 (NEPA) (42 U.S.C. 4321-4370f), and
have made a preliminary determination that this action may be one of a
category of actions that do not individually or cumulatively have a
significant effect on the human environment.
    This proposed rule involves disestablishing a safety zone, so this
action may be categorically excluded, under figure 2-1, paragraph
(34)(g) of the Instruction.
    We seek any comments or information that may lead to the discovery
of a significant environmental impact from this proposed rule.

List of Subjects

33 CFR Part 165

    Harbors, Marine Safety, Navigation (water), Reporting and
recordkeeping requirements, Security measures, and Waterways.

    For the reasons discussed in the preamble, the Coast Guard proposes
to amend 33 CFR Part 165 as follows:

PART 165--REGULATED NAVIGATION AREAS AND LIMITED ACCESS AREAS

0
1. The authority citation for Part 165 continues to read as follows:

    Authority:  33 U.S.C. 1231; 46 U.S.C. Chapter 701, 3306, 3703;
50 U.S.C. 191, 195; 33 CFR 1.05-1, 6.04-1, 6.04-6, and 160.5; Pub.
L. 107-295, 116 Stat. 2064; Department of Homeland Security
Delegation No. 0170.1.

Sec.  165.120  [Removed]

0
2. Remove Sec.  165.120 Safety Zone: Chelsea River, Boston Inner
Harbor, Boston, MA.

    Dated: July 22, 2013.
J.C. O'Connor III,
Captain, U.S. Coast Guard, Captain of the Port Boston.
[FR Doc. 2013-19104 Filed 8-6-13; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 9110-04-P


[Federal Register Volume 87, Number 73 (Friday, April 15, 2022)]
[Notices]
[Pages 22543-22546]
[FR Doc No: 2022-08146]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY

Federal Emergency Management Agency

[Docket ID FEMA-2022-0002; Internal Agency Docket No. FEMA-B-2231]

Changes in Flood Hazard Determinations

AGENCY: Federal Emergency Management Agency, Department of Homeland
Security.

ACTION: Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: This notice lists communities where the addition or
modification of Base Flood Elevations (BFEs), base flood depths,
Special Flood Hazard Area (SFHA) boundaries or zone designations, or
the regulatory floodway (hereinafter referred to as flood hazard
determinations), as shown on the Flood Insurance Rate Maps (FIRMs), and

where applicable, in the supporting Flood Insurance Study (FIS)
reports, prepared by the Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA) for
each community, is appropriate because of new scientific or technical
data. The FIRM, and where applicable, portions of the FIS report, have
been revised to reflect these flood hazard determinations through
issuance of a Letter of Map Revision (LOMR), in accordance with Federal
Regulations. The currently effective community number is shown in the
table below and must be used for all new policies and renewals.

DATES: These flood hazard determinations will be finalized on the dates
listed in the table below and revise the FIRM panels and FIS report in
effect prior to this determination for the listed communities.
    From the date of the second publication of notification of these
changes in a newspaper of local circulation, any person has 90 days in
which to request through the community that the Deputy Associate
Administrator for Insurance and Mitigation reconsider the changes. The
flood hazard determination information may be changed during the 90-day
period.

ADDRESSES: The affected communities are listed in the table below.
Revised flood hazard information for each community is available for
inspection at both the online location and the respective community map
repository address listed in the table below. Additionally, the current
effective FIRM and FIS report for each community are accessible online
through the FEMA Map Service Center at https://msc.fema.gov for
comparison.
    Submit comments and/or appeals to the Chief Executive Officer of
the community as listed in the table below.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Rick Sacbibit, Chief, Engineering
Services Branch, Federal Insurance and Mitigation Administration, FEMA,
400 C Street SW, Washington, DC 20472,<PHONE_NUMBER>, or (email)
[email protected]; or visit the FEMA Mapping and Insurance
eXchange (FMIX) online at https://www.floodmaps.fema.gov/fhm/fmx_main.html.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The specific flood hazard determinations are
not described for each community in this notice. However, the online
location and local community map repository address where the flood
hazard determination information is available for inspection is
provided.
    Any request for reconsideration of flood hazard determinations must
be submitted to the Chief Executive Officer of the community as listed
in the table below.
    The modifications are made pursuant to section 201 of the Flood
Disaster Protection Act of 1973, 42 U.S.C. 4105, and are in accordance
with the National Flood Insurance Act of 1968, 42 U.S.C. 4001 et seq.,
and with 44 CFR part 65.
    The FIRM and FIS report are the basis of the floodplain management
measures that the community is required either to adopt or to show
evidence of having in effect in order to qualify or remain qualified
for participation in the National Flood Insurance Program (NFIP).
    These flood hazard determinations, together with the floodplain
management criteria required by 44 CFR 60.3, are the minimum that are
required. They should not be construed to mean that the community must
change any existing ordinances that are more stringent in their
floodplain management requirements. The community may at any time enact
stricter requirements of its own or pursuant to policies established by
other Federal, State, or regional entities. The flood hazard
determinations are in accordance with 44 CFR 65.4.
    The affected communities are listed in the following table. Flood
hazard determination information for each community is available for
inspection at both the online location and the respective community map
repository address listed in the table below. Additionally, the current
effective FIRM and FIS report for each community are accessible online
through the FEMA Map Service Center at https://msc.fema.gov for
comparison.

(Catalog of Federal Domestic Assistance No. 97.022, ``Flood
Insurance.'')

Michael M. Grimm,
Assistant Administrator for Risk Management, Department of Homeland
Security, Federal Emergency Management Agency.

------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
                                                            Chief executive officer of                                    Online location of letter of map                            Community
         State and county          Location and case No.             community               Community map repository                 revision                Date of modification       No.
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Alabama:
    Morgan.......................  Town of Priceville     The Honorable Sam Heflin,       Planning Department, 242       https://msc.fema.gov/portal/        Jul. 5, 2022..........       010448
                                    (22-04-1537X).         Mayor, Town of Priceville,      Marco Drive, Priceville, AL    advanceSearch.
                                                           242 Marco Drive, Priceville,    35603.
                                                           AL 35603.
    Morgan.......................  Unincorporated areas   The Honorable Ray Long,         Morgan County Engineer's       https://msc.fema.gov/portal/        Jul. 5, 2022..........       010175
                                    of Morgan County (22-  Chairman, Morgan County         Office, 580 Shull Road,        advanceSearch.
                                    04-1537X).             Commission, 302 Lee Street      Hartselle, AL 35640.
                                                           Northeast, Decatur, AL 35601.
Florida:
    Bay..........................  City of Lynn Haven     Ms. Vickie Gainer, Manager,     Building Department, 817 Ohio  https://msc.fema.gov/portal/        Jun. 27, 2022.........       120009
                                    (20-04-4506P).         City of Lynn Haven, 825 Ohio    Avenue, Lynn Haven, FL         advanceSearch.
                                                           Avenue, Lynn Haven, FL 32444.   32444.
    Bay..........................  City of Panama City    The Honorable Greg Brudnicki,   Public Works Department,       https://msc.fema.gov/portal/        Jun. 27, 2022.........       120012
                                    (20-04-4506P).         Mayor, City of Panama City,     Engineering Division, 501      advanceSearch.
                                                           501 Harrison Avenue, Panama     Harrison Avenue, Panama
                                                           City, FL 32401.                 City, FL 32401.
    Bay..........................  Unincorporated areas   The Honorable Robert Carroll,   Bay County Planning and        https://msc.fema.gov/portal/        Jun. 27, 2022.........       120004
                                    of Bay County (20-04-  Chairman, Bay County Board of   Zoning Department, 840 West    advanceSearch.
                                    4506P).                Commissioners, 840 West 11th    11th Street, Panama City, FL
                                                           Street, Panama City, FL         32401.
                                                           32401.

    Lake.........................  City of Leesburg (21-  Mr. Al Minner, Manager, City    Planning and Zoning            https://msc.fema.gov/portal/        Jun. 27, 2022.........       120136
                                    04-3589P).             of Leesburg, P.O. Box 490630,   Department, 204 North 5th      advanceSearch.
                                                           Leesburg, FL 34749.             Street, Leesburg, FL 34748.
    Lake.........................  City of Leesburg (22-  Mr. Al Minner, Manager, City    Planning and Zoning            https://msc.fema.gov/portal/        Jul. 13, 2022.........       120136
                                    04-1150P).             of Leesburg, P.O. Box 490630,   Department, 204 North 5th      advanceSearch.
                                                           Leesburg, FL 34749.             Street, Leesburg, FL 34748.
    Lake.........................  Unincorporated areas   Ms. Jennifer Barker, Lake       Lake County Public Works       https://msc.fema.gov/portal/        Jun. 27, 2022.........       120421
                                    of Lake County (21-    County Interim Manager, P.O.    Department, 323 North          advanceSearch.
                                    04-3589P).             Box 7800, Tavares, FL 32778.    Sinclair Avenue, Tavares, FL
                                                                                32778.
    Lake.........................  Unincorporated areas   Ms. Jennifer Barker, Lake       Lake County Public Works       https://msc.fema.gov/portal/        Jul. 13, 2022.........       120421
                                    of Lake County (22-    County Interim Manager, P.O.    Department, 323 North          advanceSearch.
                                    04-1150P).             Box 7800, Tavares, FL 32778.    Sinclair Avenue, Tavares, FL
                                                                                32778.
    Manatee......................  Unincorporated areas   The Honorable Kevin Van         Manatee County Building and    https://msc.fema.gov/portal/        Jul. 12, 2022.........       120153
                                    of Manatee County      Ostenbridge, Chairman,          Development Services           advanceSearch.
                                    (21-04-0488P).         Manatee County Board of         Department, 1112 Manatee
                                                           Commissioners, 1112 Manatee     Avenue West, Bradenton, FL
                                                           Avenue West, Bradenton, FL      34205.
                                                           34205.
    Marion.......................  City of Ocala (21-04-  Ms. Sandra R. Wilson, Manager,  Stormwater Engineering         https://msc.fema.gov/portal/        Jul. 7, 2022..........       120330
                                    4034P).                City of Ocala, 110 Southeast    Department, 1805 Northeast     advanceSearch.
                                                           Watula Avenue, Ocala, FL        30th Avenue, Building 300,
                                                           34471.                          Ocala, FL 34470.
    Monroe.......................  Unincorporated areas   The Honorable David Rice,       Monroe County Building         https://msc.fema.gov/portal/        Jul. 11, 2022.........       125129
                                    of Monroe County (22-  Mayor, Monroe County Board of   Department, 2798 Overseas      advanceSearch.
                                    04-1070P).             Commissioners, 9400 Overseas    Highway, Suite 300,
                                                           Highway, Suite 210, Marathon,   Marathon, FL 33050.
                                                           FL 33050.
    Orange.......................  City of Orlando (21-   The Honorable Buddy Dyer,       Engineering Services           https://msc.fema.gov/portal/        Jul. 19, 2022.........       120186
                                    04-3916P).             Mayor, City of Orlando, 400     Division, 400 South Orange     advanceSearch.
                                                           South Orange Avenue, Orlando,   Avenue, Orlando, FL 32801.
                                                           FL 32801.
    Walton.......................  Unincorporated areas   The Honorable Michael Barker,   Walton County Administration   https://msc.fema.gov/portal/        Jul. 12, 2022.........       120317
                                    of Walton County (20-  Chairman, Walton County Board   Building, 76 North 6th         advanceSearch.
                                    04-4412P).             of Commissioners, 552 Walton    Street, DeFuniak Springs, FL
                                                           Road, DeFuniak Springs, FL      32433.
                                                           32433.
Maine: York......................  Town of Kennebunk (21- Mr. Michael W. Pardue,          Town Hall, 1 Summer Street,    https://msc.fema.gov/portal/        Jul. 11, 2022.........       230151
                                    01-1064P).             Manager, Town of Kennebunk, 1   Kennebunk, ME 04043.           advanceSearch.
                                                           Summer Street, Kennebunk, ME
                                                           04043.
New Mexico:
    San Juan.....................  City of Aztec (21-06-  The Honorable Michael A.        City Hall, 201 West Chaco      https://msc.fema.gov/portal/        Jul. 5, 2022..........       350065
                                    1857P).                Padilla, Sr., Mayor, City of    Street, Aztec, NM 87410.       advanceSearch.
                                                           Aztec, 201 West Chaco Street,
                                                           Aztec, NM 87410.
    San Juan.....................  Unincorporated areas   Mr. Mike Stark, San Juan        San Juan County Fire           https://msc.fema.gov/portal/        Jul. 5, 2022..........       350064
                                    of San Juan County     County Manager, 100 South       Operations Building, 209       advanceSearch.
                                    (21-06-1857P).         Oliver Drive, Aztec, NM         South Oliver Drive, Aztec,
                                                           87410.                          NM 87410.
North Carolina: Mecklenburg......  Town of Mint Hill (21- The Honorable Brad Simmons,     Town Hall, 4430 Mint Hill      https://msc.fema.gov/portal/        Jul. 13, 2022.........       370539
                                    04-4211P)              Mayor, Town of Mint Hill,       Village Lane, Mint Hill, NC    advanceSearch.
                                                           4430 Mint Hill Village Lane,    28227.
                                                           Mint Hill, NC 28227.
North Dakota: Burleigh...........  City of Bismarck (21-  The Honorable Steven Bakken,    Community Development          https://msc.fema.gov/portal/        Jul. 13, 2022.........       380149
                                    08-1104P).             Mayor, City of Bismarck, P.O.   Department, 221 North 5th      advanceSearch.
                                                           Box 5503, Bismarck, ND 58506.   Street, Bismarck, ND 58501.
Pennsylvania:
    Montgomery...................  Municipality of        Mr. Crandall O. Jones,          Municipality Hall, 235 East    https://msc.fema.gov/portal/        Jun. 27, 2022.........       425386
                                    Norristown (21-03-     Administrator, Municipality     Airy Street, Norristown, PA    advanceSearch.
                                    1308P).                of Norristown, 235 East Airy    19401.
                                                           Street, Norristown, PA 19401.

    Montgomery...................  Township of Upper      Mr. Anthony T. Hamaday,         Township Hall, 175 West        https://msc.fema.gov/portal/        Jun. 27, 2022.........       420957
                                    Merion (21-03-         Manager, Township of Upper      Valley Forge Road, King of     advanceSearch.
                                    1308P).                Merion, 175 West Valley Forge   Prussia, PA 19406.
                                                           Road, King of Prussia, PA
                                                           19406.
    Montgomery...................  Township of West       Mr. Jason Bobst, Manager,       Township Hall, 1630 West       https://msc.fema.gov/portal/        Jun. 27, 2022.........       420711
                                    Norriton (21-03-       Township of West Norriton,      Marshall Street,               advanceSearch.
                                    1308P).                1630 West Marshall Street,      Jeffersonville, PA 19403.
                                                           Jeffersonville, PA 19403.
Texas:
    Bexar........................  City of San Antonio    The Honorable Ron Nirenberg,    Transportation and Capitol     https://msc.fema.gov/portal/        Jun. 27, 2022.........       480045
                                    (21-06-2681P).         Mayor, City of San Antonio,     Improvements Department,       advanceSearch.
                                                           P.O. Box 839966, San Antonio,   Storm Water Division, 114
                                                           TX 78283.                       West Commerce Street, 7th
                                                                                Floor, San Antonio, TX
                                                                                78205.
    Dallas.......................  City of Dallas (21-06- The Honorable Eric Johnson,     Oak Cliff Municipal Center,    https://msc.fema.gov/portal/        Jul. 5, 2022..........       480171
                                    1960P).                Mayor, City of Dallas, 1500     320 East Jefferson             advanceSearch.
                                                           Marilla Street, Room 5EN,       Boulevard, Room 312, Dallas,
                                                           Dallas, TX 75201.               TX 75203.
    McLennan.....................  City of Hewitt (21-06- The Honorable Steve             Community Services             https://msc.fema.gov/portal/        Jul. 12, 2022.........       480458
                                    1238P).                Fortenberry, Mayor, City of     Department, 103 North Hewitt   advanceSearch.
                                                           Hewitt, 200 Patriot Court,      Drive, Hewitt, TX 76643.
                                                           Hewitt, TX 76643.
    McLennan.....................  City of Waco (21-06-   The Honorable Dillon Meek,      City Hall, 300 Austin Avenue,  https://msc.fema.gov/portal/        Jul. 12, 2022.........       480461
                                    1238P).                Mayor, City of Waco, 300        Waco, TX 76702.                advanceSearch.
                                                           Austin Avenue, Waco, TX
                                                           76702.
    Montgomery...................  City of Conroe (21-06- The Honorable Jody Czajkoski,   Engineering Department, 700    https://msc.fema.gov/portal/        Jul. 1, 2022..........       480484
                                    1436P).                Mayor, City of Conroe, 300      Metcalf Street, Conroe, TX     advanceSearch.
                                                           West Davis Street, Conroe, TX   77301.
                                                           77301.
    Montgomery...................  Unincorporated areas   The Honorable Mark J. Keough,   Montgomery County Engineering  https://msc.fema.gov/portal/        Jun. 27, 2022.........       480483
                                    of Montgomery County   Montgomery County Judge, 501    Department, 501 North          advanceSearch.
                                    (21-06-1567P).         North Thompson Street, Suite    Thompson Street, Suite 103,
                                                           401, Conroe, TX 77301.          Conroe, TX 77301.
    Randall......................  City of Amarillo (22-  The Honorable Ginger Nelson,    City Hall, 509 Southeast 7th   https://msc.fema.gov/portal/        Jul. 19, 2022.........       480529
                                    06-0467P).             Mayor, City of Amarillo, P.O.   Avenue, Amarillo, TX 79105.    advanceSearch.
                                                           Box 1971, Amarillo, TX 79105.
    Randall......................  Unincorporated areas   The Honorable Christy Dyer,     Randall County Road and        https://msc.fema.gov/portal/        Jul. 19, 2022.........       480532
                                    of Randall County      Randall County Judge, 501       Bridge Department, 301 West    advanceSearch.
                                    (22-06-0467P).         16th Street, Suite 303,         Highway 60, Canyon, TX
                                                           Canyon, TX 79015.               79015.
    Tarrant......................  City of Fort Worth     The Honorable Mattie Parker,    Department of Transportation   https://msc.fema.gov/portal/        Jul. 11, 2022.........       480596
                                    (21-06-1533P).         Mayor, City of Fort Worth,      and Public Works, 200 Texas    advanceSearch.
                                                           200 Texas Street, Fort Worth,   Street, Fort Worth, TX
                                                           TX 76102.                       76102.
    Williamson...................  Unincorporated areas   The Honorable Bill Gravell,     Williamson County Engineering  https://msc.fema.gov/portal/        Jul. 7, 2022..........       481079
                                    of Williamson County   Jr., Williamson County Judge,   Department, 3151 Southeast     advanceSearch.
                                    (21-06-2883P).         710 South Main Street, Suite    Inner Loop, Georgetown, TX
                                                           101, Georgetown, TX 78626.      78626.
Virginia: Albemarle..............  Unincorporated areas   Mr. Jeff Richardson, Albemarle  Albemarle County Community     https://msc.fema.gov/portal/        Jul. 13, 2022.........       510006
                                    of Albemarle County    County Executive, 401           Development Department, 401    advanceSearch.
                                    (21-03-1458P).         McIntire Road, Suite 228,       McIntire Road,
                                                           Charlottesville, VA 22902.      Charlottesville, VA 22902.
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

[FR Doc. 2022-08146 Filed 4-14-22; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 9110-12-P


TMDLs and Data used for Economic Analysis

This DVD consists of data and Total Maximum Daily Loads used in
developing the Preliminary Estimate of Potential Compliance Costs and
Benefits Associated with EPA’s Proposed Numeric Nutrient Criteria for
Florida.  Files included are from the following sources:

United States Environmental Protection Agency (U.S. EPA). 2009b. Permit

Compliance System Database. Accessed May 2009.

http://www.epa.gov/enviro/html/pcs/adhoc.html

Florida Geological Data Library (FGDL). 2009. GIS Data: WBIDs.

http://www.fgdl.org/download/index.html

Florida Department of Environmental Protection (FDEP). 2009b. Wastewater

Facility Information: Wastewater Facility Regulation (WAFR) database.

http://www.dep.state.fl.us/water/wastewater/facinfo.htm. Accessed June

2009

Florida Department of Environmental Protection (FDEP). 2009c. Final

Verified Lists for Group 1, 2, 3, 4, and 5.

http://www.dep.state.fl.us/water/watersheds/assessment/303drule.htm