[Federal Register: June 3, 2010 (Volume 75, Number 106)]
[Notices]
[Page 31430]
[DOCID:fr03jn10-56]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission

[Project No. 2594-013-MT]

Northern Lights, Inc.; Notice of Availability of Environmental
Assessment

May 27, 2010.
    In accordance with the National Environmental Policy Act of 1969
and the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission (Commission) regulations,
18 CFR part 380 (Order No. 486, 52 FR 47879), the Office of Energy
Projects has reviewed the application for a new license for the
existing Lake Creek Hydroelectric Project, located on Lake Creek in
Lincoln County, Montana, near the City of Troy and prepared a draft
environmental assessment (EA). The project does not occupy Federal
lands.
    The draft EA contains the staff's analysis of the potential
environmental impacts of the project and concludes that licensing the
project would not constitute a major federal action that would
significantly affect the quality of the human environment.
    A copy of the draft EA is on file with the Commission and is
available for public inspection. The draft EA may also be viewed on the
Commission's Web site at http://www.ferc.gov using the ``eLibrary''
link. Enter the docket number excluding the last three digits in the
docket number field to access the document. For assistance, contact
FERC Online Support at<EMAIL_ADDRESS>or toll-free at 1-
866-208-3676, or for TTY,<PHONE_NUMBER>. You may also register online
at http://www.ferc.gov/docs-filing/esubscription.asp to be notified via
e-mail of new filings and issuances related to this or other pending
projects. For assistance, contact FERC Online Support.
    Any comments should be filed within 30 days from the issuance date
of this notice, and should be addressed to the Secretary, Federal
Energy Regulatory Commission, 888 First Street, NE., Room 1-A,
Washington, DC 20426. Please affix ``Lake Creek Project No. 2594-013''
to all comments. Comments may be filed electronically via Internet in
lieu of paper.
    The Commission strongly encourages electronic filings. See 18 CFR
385.2001(a)(1)(iii) and the instructions on the Commission's Web site
under the ``eFiling'' link. For further information, contact Shana
Murray at<PHONE_NUMBER>.

Kimberly D. Bose,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2010-13368 Filed 6-2-10; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6717-01-P


[Federal Register Volume 79, Number 47 (Tuesday, March 11, 2014)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Pages 13534-13539]
[FR Doc No: 2014-04301]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION

Federal Aviation Administration

14 CFR Part 97

[Docket No. 30946; Amdt. No. 3580]

Standard Instrument Approach Procedures, and Takeoff Minimums and
Obstacle Departure Procedures; Miscellaneous Amendments

AGENCY: Federal Aviation Administration (FAA), DOT.

ACTION: Final rule.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: This rule amends, suspends, or revokes Standard Instrument
Approach Procedures (SIAPs) and associated Takeoff Minimums and

Obstacle Departure Procedures for operations at certain airports. These
regulatory actions are needed because of the adoption of new or revised
criteria, or because of changes occurring in the National Airspace
System, such as the commissioning of new navigational facilities,
adding new obstacles, or changing air traffic requirements. These
changes are designed to provide safe and efficient use of the navigable
airspace and to promote safe flight operations under instrument flight
rules at the affected airports.

DATES: This rule is effective March 11, 2014. The compliance date for
each SIAP, associated Takeoff Minimums, and ODP is specified in the
amendatory provisions.
    The incorporation by reference of certain publications listed in
the regulations is approved by the Director of the Federal Register as
of March 11, 2014.

ADDRESSES: Availability of matter incorporated by reference in the
amendment is as follows:
    For Examination--
    1. FAA Rules Docket, FAA Headquarters Building, 800 Independence
Avenue SW., Washington, DC 20591;
    2. The FAA Regional Office of the region in which the affected
airport is located;
    3. The National Flight Procedures Office, 6500 South MacArthur
Blvd., Oklahoma City, OK 73169 or,
    4. The National Archives and Records Administration (NARA). For
information on the availability of this material at NARA, call 202-741-
6030, or go to: http://www.archives.gov/federal_register/code_of_federal_regulations/ibr_locations.html.
    Availability_All SIAPs are available online free of charge. Visit
nfdc.faa.gov to register. Additionally, individual SIAP and Takeoff
Minimums and ODP copies may be obtained from:
    1. FAA Public Inquiry Center (APA-200), FAA Headquarters Building,
800 Independence Avenue SW., Washington, DC 20591; or
    2. The FAA Regional Office of the region in which the affected
airport is located.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Richard A. Dunham III, Flight
Procedure Standards Branch (AFS-420) Flight Technologies and Programs
Division, Flight Standards Service, Federal Aviation Administration,
Mike Monroney Aeronautical Center, 6500 South MacArthur Blvd., Oklahoma
City, OK 73169 (Mail Address: P.O. Box 25082 Oklahoma City, OK 73125)
telephone:<PHONE_NUMBER>.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: This rule amends Title 14, Code of Federal
Regulations, Part 97 (14 CFR part 97) by amending the referenced SIAPs.
The complete regulatory description of each SIAP is listed on the
appropriate FAA Form 8260, as modified by the National Flight Data
Center (FDC)/Permanent Notice to Airmen (P-NOTAM), and is incorporated
by reference in the amendment under 5 U.S.C. 552(a), 1 CFR part 51, and
Sec.  97.20 of Title 14 of the Code of Federal Regulations.
    The large number of SIAPs, their complex nature, and the need for a
special format make their verbatim publication in the Federal Register
expensive and impractical. Further, airmen do not use the regulatory
text of the SIAPs, but refer to their graphic depiction on charts
printed by publishers of aeronautical materials. Thus, the advantages
of incorporation by reference are realized and publication of the
complete description of each SIAP contained in FAA form documents is
unnecessary. This amendment provides the affected CFR sections and
specifies the types of SIAP and the corresponding effective dates. This
amendment also identifies the airport and its location, the procedure
and the amendment number.

The Rule

    This amendment to 14 CFR part 97 is effective upon publication of
each separate SIAP as amended in the transmittal. For safety and
timeliness of change considerations, this amendment incorporates only
specific changes contained for each SIAP as modified by FDC/P-NOTAMs.
    The SIAPs, as modified by FDC P-NOTAM, and contained in this
amendment are based on the criteria contained in the U.S. Standard for
Terminal Instrument Procedures (TERPS). In developing these changes to
SIAPs, the TERPS criteria were applied only to specific conditions
existing at the affected airports. All SIAP amendments in this rule
have been previously issued by the FAA in a FDC NOTAM as an emergency
action of immediate flight safety relating directly to published
aeronautical charts. The circumstances which created the need for all
these SIAP amendments requires making them effective in less than 30
days.
    Because of the close and immediate relationship between these SIAPs
and safety in air commerce, I find that notice and public procedure
before adopting these SIAPs are impracticable and contrary to the
public interest and, where applicable, that good cause exists for
making these SIAPs effective in less than 30 days.

Conclusion

    The FAA has determined that this regulation only involves an
established body of technical regulations for which frequent and
routine amendments are necessary to keep them operationally current.
It, therefore-- (1) is not a ``significant regulatory action'' under
Executive Order 12866; (2) is not a ``significant rule'' under DOT
regulatory Policies and Procedures (44 FR 11034; February 26, 1979);
and (3) does not warrant preparation of a regulatory evaluation as the
anticipated impact is so minimal. For the same reason, the FAA
certifies that this amendment will not have a significant economic
impact on a substantial number of small entities under the criteria of
the Regulatory Flexibility Act.

List of Subjects in 14 CFR Part 97

    Air traffic control, Airports, Incorporation by reference, and
Navigation (air).

    Issued in Washington, DC, on February 14, 2014.
John Duncan,
Director, Flight Standards Service.

Adoption of the Amendment

    Accordingly, pursuant to the authority delegated to me, Title 14,
Code of Federal regulations, Part 97, 14 CFR part 97, is amended by
amending Standard Instrument Approach Procedures, effective at 0901 UTC
on the dates specified, as follows:

PART 97--STANDARD INSTRUMENT APPROACH PROCEDURES

0
1. The authority citation for part 97 continues to read as follows:

    Authority: 49 U.S.C. 106(g), 40103, 40106, 40113, 40114, 40120,
44502, 44514, 44701, 44719, 44721-44722.

0
2. Part 97 is amended to read as follows:

Sec. Sec.  97.23, 97.25, 97.27, 97.29, 97.31, 97.33, 97.35  [Amended]

    By amending: Sec.  97.23 VOR, VOR/DME, VOR or TACAN, and VOR/DME or
TACAN; Sec.  97.25 LOC, LOC/DME, LDA, LDA/DME, SDF, SDF/DME; Sec.
97.27 NDB, NDB/DME; Sec.  97.29 ILS, ILS/DME, MLS, MLS/DME, MLS/RNAV;
Sec.  97.31 RADAR SIAPs; Sec.  97.33 RNAV SIAPs; and Sec.  97.35 COPTER
SIAPs, Identified as follows:

Effective Upon Publication

----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
      AIRAC Date          State           City            Airport        FDC No.      FDC Date       Subject
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
4/3/2014.............  AZ           Globe...........  San Carlos            3/1061     02/03/14  GPS RWY 27,
                                                       Apache.                                    Orig.
4/3/2014.............  OR           Aurora..........  Aurora State...       3/2076     02/04/14  LOC RWY 17,
                                                                                Amdt 1A.
4/3/2014.............  OR           Aurora..........  Aurora State...       3/2079     02/04/14  VOR/DME A, Amdt
                                                                                3A.
4/3/2014.............  OR           Aurora..........  Aurora State...       3/2084     02/04/14  RNAV (GPS) B,
                                                                                Orig-A.
4/3/2014.............  MA           Fitchburg.......  Fitchburg Muni.       3/4501     02/07/14  RNAV (GPS) RWY
                                                                                20, Orig-A.
4/3/2014.............  MA           Fitchburg.......  Fitchburg Muni.       3/4515     02/07/14  NDB RWY 20,
                                                                                Amdt 6A.
4/3/2014.............  MA           Fitchburg.......  Fitchburg Muni.       3/4517     02/07/14  RNAV (GPS) RWY
                                                                                32, Orig-B.
4/3/2014.............  MA           Fitchburg.......  Fitchburg Muni.       3/4518     02/07/14  RNAV (GPS) RWY
                                                                                14, Orig-A.
4/3/2014.............  OR           Aurora..........  Aurora State...       3/4604     02/04/14  RNAV (GPS) RWY
                                                                                35, Orig-D.
4/3/2014.............  AK           Nome............  Nome...........       3/4741     01/22/14  VOR/DME RWY 10,
                                                                                Amdt 2B.
4/3/2014.............  AK           Nome............  Nome...........       3/4742     01/22/14  LOC/DME BC RWY
                                                                                10, Amdt 3B.
4/3/2014.............  AK           Nome............  Nome...........       3/4769     01/22/14  RNAV (GPS) RWY
                                                                                10, Amdt 1.
4/3/2014.............  WY           Rawlins.........  Rawlins Muni/         3/5389     02/04/14  VOR/DME RWY 22,
                                                       Harvey Field.                              Amdt 2.
4/3/2014.............  WY           Rawlins.........  Rawlins Muni/         3/5390     02/04/14  RNAV (GPS) RWY
                                                       Harvey Field.                              22, Orig.
4/3/2014.............  TX           Wichita Falls...  Kickapoo              3/5443     02/04/14  NDB RWY 35,
                                                       Downtown.                                  Amdt 4.
4/3/2014.............  MT           Choteau.........  Choteau........       3/5449     02/10/14  NDB OR GPS RWY
                                                                                23, Orig-A.
4/3/2014.............  MT           Conrad..........  Conrad.........       3/5459     02/03/14  NDB OR GPS RWY
                                                                                24, Amdt 4B.
4/3/2014.............  AK           Gustavus........  Gustavus.......       3/5773     02/04/14  RNAV (GPS) RWY
                                                                                29, Amdt 2A.
4/3/2014.............  AK           Homer...........  Homer..........       3/7744     01/22/14  RNAV (GPS) Z
                                                                                RWY 22, Amdt
                                                                                1.
4/3/2014.............  AK           St George.......  St George......       3/7748     01/22/14  ILS RWY 11,
                                                                                Orig-A.
4/3/2014.............  AK           Homer...........  Homer..........       3/7749     01/22/14  RNAV (GPS) Y
                                                                                RWY 22, Amdt
                                                                                1.
4/3/2014.............  AK           Homer...........  Homer..........       3/7750     01/22/14  LOC/DME BC RWY
                                                                                22, Amdt 5A.
4/3/2014.............  AK           Homer...........  Homer..........       3/7752     01/22/14  RNAV (GPS) Y
                                                                                RWY 4, Amdt 1.
4/3/2014.............  AK           Homer...........  Homer..........       3/7757     01/22/14  RNAV (GPS) Z
                                                                                RWY 4, Amdt 1.
4/3/2014.............  AK           Yakutat.........  Yakutat........       3/9556     01/24/14  RNAV (GPS) RWY
                                                                                2, Amdt 2.
4/3/2014.............  AK           Venetie.........  Venetie........       3/9780     02/10/14  Takeoff
                                                                                Minimums and
                                                                                (Obstacle) DP,
                                                                                Orig.
4/3/2014.............  AK           Minchumina......  Minchumina.....       3/9782     01/22/14  RNAV (GPS) RWY
                                                                                21, Orig-A.
4/3/2014.............  AK           Minchumina......  Minchumina.....       3/9783     01/22/14  NDB RWY 3, Amdt
                                                                                3B.
4/3/2014.............  AK           Minchumina......  Minchumina.....       3/9784     01/22/14  RNAV (GPS) RWY
                                                                                3, Orig-A.
4/3/2014.............  AK           Northway........  Northway.......       3/9792     02/03/14  RNAV (GPS) RWY
                                                                                23, Amdt 1A.
4/3/2014.............  AK           Klawock.........  Klawock........       3/9793     02/04/14  NDB/DME RWY 2,
                                                                                Amdt 1A.
4/3/2014.............  OR           Newport.........  Newport Muni...       4/0070     02/03/14  VOR/DME RWY 16,
                                                                                Amdt 8.
4/3/2014.............  AK           Bethel..........  Bethel.........       4/0076     02/04/14  ILS OR LOC/DME
                                                                                Z RWY 19R,
                                                                                Amdt 7B.
4/3/2014.............  AK           Bethel..........  Bethel.........       4/0077     02/04/14  RNAV (GPS) RWY
                                                                                19R, Amdt 2A.
4/3/2014.............  AK           Bethel..........  Bethel.........       4/0078     02/04/14  VOR/DME RWY 1L,
                                                                                Amdt 2A.
4/3/2014.............  AK           Bethel..........  Bethel.........       4/0079     02/04/14  RNAV (GPS) RWY
                                                                                19L, Orig-A.
4/3/2014.............  AK           Bethel..........  Bethel.........       4/0080     02/04/14  RNAV (GPS) RWY
                                                                                1L, Amdt 1A.
4/3/2014.............  AK           Bethel..........  Bethel.........       4/0081     02/04/14  RNAV (GPS) A,
                                                                                Amdt 1.
4/3/2014.............  AK           Bethel..........  Bethel.........       4/0082     02/04/14  VOR/DME RWY
                                                                                19R, Amdt 2A.
4/3/2014.............  AK           Bethel..........  Bethel.........       4/0083     02/04/14  RNAV (GPS) RWY
                                                                                1R, Orig-B.
4/3/2014.............  OR           Portland........  Portland-             4/0241     02/04/14  NDB B, Amdt 2.
                                                       Hillsboro.
4/3/2014.............  AK           Dillingham......  Dillingham.....       4/1521     02/04/14  VOR RWY 1, Amdt
                                                                                9A.

4/3/2014.............  ID           Coeur D'Alene...  Coeur D'Alene--       4/1584     02/04/14  VOR RWY 6, Orig-
                                                       Pappy                                      B.
                                                       Boyington
                                                       Field.
4/3/2014.............  ID           Coeur D'Alene...  Coeur D'Alene--       4/1585     02/04/14  NDB RWY 6, Amdt
                                                       Pappy                                      2C.
                                                       Boyington
                                                       Field.
4/3/2014.............  AK           Dillingham......  Dillingham.....       4/1924     02/04/14  RNAV (GPS) RWY
                                                                                1, Amdt 2A.
4/3/2014.............  AK           Fort Yukon......  Fort Yukon.....       4/1927     02/04/14  RNAV (GPS) RWY
                                                                                4, Amdt 1.
4/3/2014.............  AK           Fort Yukon......  Fort Yukon.....       4/1928     02/04/14  RNAV (GPS) RWY
                                                                                22, Amdt 1.
4/3/2014.............  NE           Hebron..........  Hebron Muni....       4/1932     02/04/14  GPS RWY 12,
                                                                                Orig-B.
4/3/2014.............  NE           Hebron..........  Hebron Muni....       4/1933     02/04/14  NDB RWY 12,
                                                                                Amdt 4A.
4/3/2014.............  NE           Hebron..........  Hebron Muni....       4/1934     02/04/14  GPS RWY 30,
                                                                                Orig-A.
4/3/2014.............  AZ           Marana..........  Marana Rgnl....       4/2469     02/04/14  RNAV (GPS) RWY
                                                                                21, Amdt 1.
4/3/2014.............  AZ           Marana..........  Marana Rgnl....       4/2470     02/04/14  RNAV (GPS) RWY
                                                                                12, Amdt 1.
4/3/2014.............  AK           Kwethluk........  Kwethluk.......       4/2504     02/04/14  RNAV (GPS) RWY
                                                                                36, Orig.
4/3/2014.............  AK           Kwethluk........  Kwethluk.......       4/2505     02/04/14  RNAV (GPS) RWY
                                                                                18, Orig.
4/3/2014.............  SD           Mobridge........  Mobridge Muni..       4/2521     02/04/14  RNAV (GPS) RWY
                                                                                12, Orig.
4/3/2014.............  OH           Waverly.........  Pike County....       4/3053     02/04/14  RNAV (GPS) RWY
                                                                                25, Orig.
4/3/2014.............  OH           Waverly.........  Pike County....       4/3054     02/04/14  NDB RWY 25,
                                                                                Amdt 1A.
4/3/2014.............  CA           Auburn..........  Auburn Muni....       4/3055     02/04/14  RNAV (GPS) RWY
                                                                                7, Orig.
4/3/2014.............  AK           Ambler..........  Ambler.........       4/3379     02/10/14  Takeoff
                                                                                Minimums and
                                                                                (Obstacle) DP,
                                                                                Orig.
4/3/2014.............  AK           Ambler..........  Ambler.........       4/3380     02/10/14  NDB RWY 36,
                                                                                Amdt 2A.
4/3/2014.............  NY           Massena.........  Massena Intl--        4/3394     02/10/14  Takeoff
                                                       Richards Field.                            Minimums and
                                                                                (Obstacle) DP,
                                                                                Amdt 8.
4/3/2014.............  OK           Pryor...........  Mid-America           4/4127     02/10/14  VOR/DME OR GPS
                                                       Industrial.                                A, Orig.
4/3/2014.............  OH           Lebanon.........  Warren County/        4/4390     02/10/14  NDB A, Amdt 5A.
                                                       John Lane
                                                       Field.
4/3/2014.............  RI           North Kingstown.  Quonset State..       4/4541     02/07/14  ILS OR LOC RWY
                                                                                16, Amdt 10B.
4/3/2014.............  RI           North Kingstown.  Quonset State..       4/4542     02/07/14  RNAV (GPS) RWY
                                                                                34, Orig-A.
4/3/2014.............  RI           North Kingstown.  Quonset State..       4/4543     02/07/14  RNAV (GPS) RWY
                                                                                16, Orig-A.
4/3/2014.............  VA           Stafford........  Stafford Rgnl..       4/4545     02/07/14  ILS OR LOC RWY
                                                                                33, Orig.
4/3/2014.............  PA           Butler..........  Butler County/K       4/4549     02/07/14  Takeoff
                                                       W Scholter                                 Minimums and
                                                       Field.                                     (Obstacle) DP,
                                                                                Amdt 3.
4/3/2014.............  AK           Bethel..........  Bethel.........       4/4580     02/04/14  ILS OR LOC/DME
                                                                                Y RWY 19R,
                                                                                Orig-A.
4/3/2014.............  NY           Monticello......  Sullivan County       4/4677     02/07/14  ILS OR LOC RWY
                                                       Intl.                                      15, Amdt 5C.
4/3/2014.............  NY           Monticello......  Sullivan County       4/4678     02/07/14  NDB RWY 15,
                                                       Intl.                                      Amdt 7.
4/3/2014.............  NY           Monticello......  Sullivan County       4/4679     02/07/14  RNAV (GPS) RWY
                                                       Intl.                                      15, Orig.
4/3/2014.............  NY           Monticello......  Sullivan County       4/4683     02/07/14  VOR/DME RWY 33,
                                                       Intl.                                      Amdt 3.
4/3/2014.............  NY           Norwich.........  Lt Warren Eaton       4/4686     02/07/14  RNAV (GPS) RWY
                                                                                1, Orig.
4/3/2014.............  NY           Monticello......  Sullivan County       4/4701     02/07/14  RNAV (GPS) RWY
                                                       Intl.                                      33, Amdt 1.
4/3/2014.............  GA           Atlanta.........  Covington Muni.       4/4714     02/07/14  VOR/DME RWY 10,
                                                                                Amdt 5.
4/3/2014.............  MT           Great Falls.....  Great Falls           4/4956     02/10/14  NDB RWY 34,
                                                       Intl.                                      Amdt 16B.
4/3/2014.............  NY           Hudson..........  Columbia County       4/4961     02/07/14  RNAV (GPS) RWY
                                                                                21, Orig.
4/3/2014.............  NY           Hudson..........  Columbia County       4/4962     02/07/14  NDB A, Amdt 4.
4/3/2014.............  NY           Hudson..........  Columbia County       4/4964     02/07/14  RNAV (GPS) RWY
                                                                                3, Orig.
4/3/2014.............  MO           Sullivan........  Sullivan Rgnl..       4/5024     02/04/14  NDB RWY 24,
                                                                                Orig-A.
4/3/2014.............  FL           New Smyrna Beach  New Smyrna            4/5193     02/07/14  RNAV (GPS) RWY
                                                       Beach Muni.                                7, Orig.
4/3/2014.............  FL           New Smyrna Beach  New Smyrna            4/5197     02/07/14  RADAR 1, Amdt
                                                       Beach Muni.                                3A.
4/3/2014.............  FL           New Smyrna Beach  New Smyrna            4/5198     02/07/14  NDB RWY 29,
                                                       Beach Muni.                                Amdt 2.

4/3/2014.............  FL           New Smyrna Beach  New Smyrna            4/5199     02/07/14  RNAV (GPS) RWY
                                                       Beach Muni.                                29, Orig.
4/3/2014.............  FL           New Smyrna Beach  New Smyrna            4/5200     02/07/14  RNAV (GPS) RWY
                                                       Beach Muni.                                25, Orig.
4/3/2014.............  FL           New Smyrna Beach  New Smyrna            4/5201     02/07/14  RNAV (GPS) RWY
                                                       Beach Muni.                                2, Orig.
4/3/2014.............  DC           Washington......  Manassas Rgnl/        4/5240     02/07/14  RNAV (GPS) RWY
                                                       Harry P. Davis                             16L, Amdt 1.
                                                       Field.
4/3/2014.............  FL           La Belle........  La Belle Muni..       4/5281     02/07/14  RNAV (GPS) RWY
                                                                                32, Orig.
4/3/2014.............  FL           La Belle........  La Belle Muni..       4/5283     02/07/14  RNAV (GPS) RWY
                                                                                14, Orig-A.
4/3/2014.............  MA           Plymouth........  Plymouth Muni..       4/5310     02/07/14  RNAV (GPS) RWY
                                                                                24, Orig.
4/3/2014.............  NJ           Mount Holly.....  South Jersey          4/5312     02/07/14  RNAV (GPS) RWY
                                                       Rgnl.                                      8, Orig.
4/3/2014.............  NJ           Mount Holly.....  South Jersey          4/5314     02/07/14  RNAV (GPS) RWY
                                                       Rgnl.                                      26, Amdt 1.
4/3/2014.............  TN           Athens..........  McMinn County..       4/5315     02/07/14  NDB RWY 2, Amdt
                                                                                6.
4/3/2014.............  TN           Athens..........  McMinn County..       4/5316     02/07/14  NDB RWY 20,
                                                                                Amdt 7.
4/3/2014.............  TN           Livingston......  Livingston Muni       4/5329     02/07/14  RNAV (GPS) RWY
                                                                                3, Amdt 1.
4/3/2014.............  TN           Livingston......  Livingston Muni       4/5330     02/07/14  VOR/DME RWY 21,
                                                                                Amdt 5.
4/3/2014.............  CT           Chester.........  Chester........       4/5540     02/04/14  RNAV (GPS) RWY
                                                                                35, Orig.
4/3/2014.............  CT           Chester.........  Chester........       4/5541     02/04/14  RNAV (GPS) RWY
                                                                                17, Orig.
4/3/2014.............  CT           Chester.........  Chester........       4/5542     02/04/14  VOR A, Amdt 4.
4/3/2014.............  AL           Haleyville......  Posey Field....       4/5551     02/07/14  VOR/DME RWY 18,
                                                                                Amdt 5.
4/3/2014.............  AL           Haleyville......  Posey Field....       4/5552     02/07/14  RNAV (GPS) RWY
                                                                                18, Orig.
4/3/2014.............  AL           Haleyville......  Posey Field....       4/5553     02/07/14  VOR/DME A, Amdt
                                                                                4.
4/3/2014.............  AL           Haleyville......  Posey Field....       4/5554     02/07/14  RNAV (GPS) RWY
                                                                                36, Orig.
4/3/2014.............  WI           Shawano.........  Shawano Muni...       4/5602     02/07/14  Takeoff
                                                                                Minimums and
                                                                                (Obstacle) DP,
                                                                                Amdt 2.
4/3/2014.............  WI           Amery...........  Amery Muni.....       4/5603     02/07/14  Takeoff
                                                                                Minimums and
                                                                                (Obstacle) DP,
                                                                                Amdt 1.
4/3/2014.............  PA           West Chester....  Brandywine.....       4/5824     02/10/14  RNAV (GPS) RWY
                                                                                9, Orig-A.
4/3/2014.............  PA           West Chester....  Brandywine.....       4/5825     02/10/14  RNAV (GPS) RWY
                                                                                27, Orig-A.
4/3/2014.............  PA           West Chester....  Brandywine.....       4/5826     02/10/14  VOR A, Amdt 3.
4/3/2014.............  NJ           Toms River......  Ocean County          4/5831     02/07/14  Takeoff
                                                       Airport.                                   Minimums
                                                                                and(Obstacle)
                                                                                DP, Amdt 1.
4/3/2014.............  NY           Massena.........  Massena Intl--        4/5889     02/07/14  RNAV (GPS) RWY
                                                       Richards Field.                            9, Amdt 1A.
4/3/2014.............  VA           Suffolk.........  Suffolk               4/5890     02/07/14  RNAV (GPS) RWY
                                                       Executive.                                 7, Amdt 1.
4/3/2014.............  TN           Morristown......  Moore-Murrell..       4/5901     02/07/14  RNAV (GPS) RWY
                                                                                5, Orig.
4/3/2014.............  TN           Morristown......  Moore-Murrell..       4/5902     02/07/14  NDB RWY 5, Amdt
                                                                                5.
4/3/2014.............  TN           Morristown......  Moore-Murrell..       4/5903     02/07/14  RNAV (GPS) RWY
                                                                                23, Orig.
4/3/2014.............  TN           Morristown......  Moore-Murrell..       4/5904     02/07/14  SDF RWY 5, Amdt
                                                                                5.
4/3/2014.............  NC           Oak Island......  Cape Fear Rgnl        4/5905     02/10/14  RNAV (GPS) RWY
                                                       Jetport/Howie                              23, Orig.
                                                       Franklin Fld.
4/3/2014.............  NC           Oak Island......  Cape Fear Rgnl        4/5906     02/10/14  RNAV (GPS) RWY
                                                       Jetport/Howie                              5, Amdt 1B.
                                                       Franklin Fld.
4/3/2014.............  NY           Farmingdale.....  Republic.......       4/6074     02/07/14  RNAV (GPS) RWY
                                                                                19, Amdt 2.
4/3/2014.............  ID           Mountain Home...  Mountain Home         4/6563     02/10/14  NDB RWY 28,
                                                       Muni.                                      Amdt 3.
4/3/2014.............  ID           Mountain Home...  Mountain Home         4/6564     02/10/14  Takeoff
                                                       Muni.                                      Minimums and
                                                                                (Obstacle) DP,
                                                                                Amdt 4.
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

[FR Doc. 2014-04301 Filed 3-10-14; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910-13-P


[Federal Register: November 1, 2006 (Volume 71, Number 211)]
[Notices]
[Page 64257]
[DOCID:fr01no06-51]

=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission

[Docket No. RP07-28-000]

CenterPoint Energy--Mississippi River Transmission Corporation;
Notice of Penalty Revenue Credit Report

October 25, 2006.
    Take notice that on October 19, 2006, CenterPoint Energy--
Mississippi River Transmission Corporation (MRT) tendered for filing a
refund report showing penalty revenues that will be refunded, with
interest, to the affected shippers upon approval from the Commission.
    Any person desiring to intervene or to protest this filing must
file in accordance with Rules 211 and 214 of the Commission's Rules of
Practice and Procedure (18 CFR 385.211 and 385.214). Protests will be
considered by the Commission in determining the appropriate action to
be taken, but will not serve to make protestants parties to the
proceeding. Any person wishing to become a party must file a notice of
intervention or motion to intervene, as appropriate. Such notices,
motions, or protests must be filed in accordance with the provisions of
Sec.  154.210 of the Commission's regulations (18 CFR 154.210). Anyone
filing an intervention or protest must serve a copy of that document on
the Applicant. Anyone filing an intervention or protest on or before
the intervention or protest date need not serve motions to intervene or
protests on persons other than the Applicant.
    The Commission encourages electronic submission of protests and
interventions in lieu of paper using the ``eFiling'' link at http://www.ferc.gov.
 Persons unable to file electronically should submit an

original and 14 copies of the protest or intervention to the Federal
Energy Regulatory Commission, 888 First Street, NE., Washington, DC
20426.
    This filing is accessible on-line at http://www.ferc.gov, using the

``eLibrary'' link and is available for review in the Commission's
Public Reference Room in Washington, DC. There is an ``eSubscription''
link on the Web site that enables subscribers to receive e-mail
notification when a document is added to a subscribed docket(s). For
assistance with any FERC Online service, please e-mail
<EMAIL_ADDRESS>or call<PHONE_NUMBER> (toll free). For

TTY, call<PHONE_NUMBER>.

Magalie R. Salas,
Secretary.
 [FR Doc. E6-18341 Filed 10-31-06; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 6717-01-P


[Federal Register Volume 83, Number 245 (Friday, December 21, 2018)]
[Notices]
[Pages 65659-65660]
[FR Doc No: 2018-27581]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY

[EPA-HQ-OW-2014-0359; FRL-9986-56-OEI]

Information Collection Request Submitted to OMB for Review and
Approval; Comment Request; Underground Injection Control Program

AGENCY: Environmental Protection Agency (EPA).

ACTION: Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) has submitted an
information collection request (ICR), Underground Injection Control
Program (EPA ICR No. 0370.26, OMB Control No. 2040-0042) to the Office
of Management and Budget (OMB) for review and approval in accordance
with the Paperwork Reduction Act. This is a proposed renewal of the
ICR, which is currently approved through December 31, 2018. The EPA
previously requested public comments via the Federal Register on June
6, 2018, during a 60-day comment period. This notice allows for an
additional 30 days for public comments. A fuller description of the ICR
is given below, including its estimated burden and cost to the public.
An agency may not conduct or sponsor and a person is not required to
respond to a collection of information unless it

displays a currently valid OMB control number.

DATES: Comments may be submitted on or before January 22, 2019.

ADDRESSES: Submit your comments, referencing Docket ID Number EPA-HQ-
OW-2014-0359, to (1) the EPA: Online using www.regulations.gov (our
preferred method), by email to<EMAIL_ADDRESS>or by mail to: EPA
Docket Center, Environmental Protection Agency, Mail Code 28221T, 1200
Pennsylvania Ave. NW, Washington, DC 20460, and (2) OMB: via email to
<EMAIL_ADDRESS>Address comments to OMB Desk Officer for
the EPA.
    The EPA's policy is that all comments received will be included in
the public docket without change including any personal information
provided, unless the comment includes profanity, threats, information
claimed to be Confidential Business Information (CBI) or other
information whose disclosure is restricted by statute.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Kyle Carey, Office of Ground Water and
Drinking Water/Drinking Water Protection Division, 4606M, Environmental
Protection Agency, 1200 Pennsylvania Ave. NW, Washington, DC 20460;
telephone number:<PHONE_NUMBER>; fax number:<PHONE_NUMBER>; email
address<EMAIL_ADDRESS>
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Supporting documents, which explain in
detail the information that the EPA will be collecting, are available
in the public docket for this ICR. The docket can be viewed online at
www.regulations.gov or in person at the EPA Docket Center, WJC West,
Room 3334, 1301 Constitution Ave. NW, Washington, DC 20004. The
telephone number for the Docket Center is<PHONE_NUMBER>. For additional
information about the EPA's public docket, visit http://www.epa.gov/dockets.
    Abstract: The Underground Injection Control (UIC) Program, under
authority of the Safe Drinking Water Act, established a federal-state
regulatory system to protect underground sources of drinking water
(USDWs) by ensuring that they are not endangered by the underground
injection of fluids. Injected fluids include hazardous waste, oil field
brines or produced water, mineral processing fluids, various types of
industrial fluids, automotive, sanitary and other wastes, and carbon
dioxide injected for geologic sequestration. Owners or operators of
injection wells must obtain permits, conduct environmental monitoring,
maintain records, and report results to the EPA or the state agency
with UIC primary enforcement responsibility (primacy). States must
report to the EPA on permittee compliance and related information. This
required information is reported using the EPA's standardized forms (or
state equivalents) and annual reports; the governing regulations are
codified in the Code of Federal Regulations (CFR) at 40 CFR parts 144
through 148. The data are used by UIC authorities to ensure the
protection of USDWs.
    Form Numbers: 7520-1, 7520-2A, 7520-2B, 7520-3, 7520-4, 7520-6,
7520-7, 7520-8, 7520-11, 7520-16, 7520-17, 7520-18, and 7520-19.
    Respondents/affected entities: Owners or operators of underground
injection wells and state UIC Program primacy agencies.
    Respondent's obligation to respond: Mandatory (40 CFR parts 144
through 148).
    Estimated number of respondents: 40,168 (total).
    Frequency of response: Annual, semi-annual, and quarterly.
    Total estimated burden: 1,292,260 hours (per year). Burden is
defined at 5 CFR 1320.03(b).
    Total estimated cost: $227,307,259 (per year), includes
$168,345,558 annualized capital or operation and maintenance costs.
    Changes in the Estimates: There is a decrease of 421,786 hours in
the total estimated respondent burden compared with the ICR currently
approved by OMB. This decrease is due to changes in the injection well
inventory, primarily a significant reduction in the number of Class II
and Class VI permit applications expected to be prepared and reviewed;
a decrease in the number of Class V inventory forms that are
anticipated to be submitted; and a decrease in the number of Class I
and Class VI well operators that the EPA estimates will be submitting
information. Furthermore, the EPA has revised the operator reporting
forms, which has resulted in additional burden reductions for operators
of all well classes. These decreases are partially offset by an
increase in burden due to anticipated changes in the number of Class
III permit applications.

Courtney Kerwin,
Director, Regulatory Support Division.
[FR Doc. 2018-27581 Filed 12-20-18; 8:45 am]
 BILLING CODE 6560-50-P


[Federal Register Volume 86, Number 138 (Thursday, July 22, 2021)]
[Notices]
[Page 38737]
[FR Doc No: 2021-15635]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY

Federal Emergency Management Agency

[Internal Agency Docket No. FEMA-4595-DR; Docket ID FEMA-2021-0001]

Kentucky; Amendment No. 5 to Notice of a Major Disaster
Declaration

AGENCY: Federal Emergency Management Agency, DHS.

ACTION: Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: This notice amends the notice of a major disaster declaration
for the Commonwealth of Kentucky (FEMA-4595-DR), dated April 23, 2021,
and related determinations.

DATES: This amendment was issued June 23, 2021.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Dean Webster, Office of Response and
Recovery, Federal Emergency Management Agency, 500 C Street SW,
Washington, DC 20472,<PHONE_NUMBER>.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The notice of a major disaster declaration
for the Commonwealth of Kentucky is hereby amended to include the
following area among those areas determined to have been adversely
affected by the event declared a major disaster by the President in his
declaration of April 23, 2021.

    Ballard County for Public Assistance.

    The following Catalog of Federal Domestic Assistance Numbers
(CFDA) are to be used for reporting and drawing funds: 97.030,
Community Disaster Loans; 97.031, Cora Brown Fund; 97.032, Crisis
Counseling; 97.033, Disaster Legal Services; 97.034, Disaster
Unemployment Assistance (DUA); 97.046, Fire Management Assistance
Grant; 97.048, Disaster Housing Assistance to Individuals and
Households In Presidentially Declared Disaster Areas; 97.049,
Presidentially Declared Disaster Assistance--Disaster Housing
Operations for Individuals and Households; 97.050, Presidentially
Declared Disaster Assistance to Individuals and Households--Other
Needs; 97.036, Disaster Grants--Public Assistance (Presidentially
Declared Disasters); 97.039, Hazard Mitigation Grant.

Deanne Criswell,
Administrator, Federal Emergency Management Agency.
[FR Doc. 2021-15635 Filed 7-21-21; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 9111-23-P


[Federal Register Volume 80, Number 146 (Thursday, July 30, 2015)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Pages 45438-45443]
[FR Doc No: 2015-18738]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY

40 CFR Part 180

[EPA-HQ-OPP-2013-0138; FRL-9923-86]

Isofetamid; Pesticide Tolerances

AGENCY: Environmental Protection Agency (EPA).

ACTION: Final rule.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: This regulation establishes tolerances for residues of
isofetamid in or on multiple commodities that are identified and
discussed later in this document. ISK Biosciences Corporation requested
these tolerances under the Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act
(FFDCA).

DATES: This regulation is effective July 30, 2015. Objections and
requests for hearings must be received on or before September 28, 2015,
and must be filed in accordance with the instructions provided in 40
CFR part 178 (see also Unit I.C. of the SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION).

ADDRESSES: The docket for this action, identified by docket
identification (ID) number EPA-HQ-OPP-2013-0138, is available at http://www.regulations.gov or at the Office of Pesticide Programs Regulatory
Public Docket (OPP Docket) in the Environmental Protection Agency
Docket Center (EPA/DC), West William Jefferson Clinton Bldg., Rm. 3334,
1301 Constitution Ave. NW., Washington, DC 20460-0001. The Public
Reading Room is open from 8:30 a.m. to 4:30 p.m., Monday through
Friday, excluding legal holidays. The telephone number for the Public
Reading Room is<PHONE_NUMBER>, and the telephone number for the OPP
Docket is<PHONE_NUMBER>. Please review the visitor instructions and
additional information about the docket available at http://www.epa.gov/dockets.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Susan Lewis, Registration Division
(7505P), Office of Pesticide Programs, Environmental Protection Agency,
1200 Pennsylvania Ave. NW., Washington, DC 20460-0001; telephone
number:<PHONE_NUMBER>; email address<EMAIL_ADDRESS>
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

I. General Information

A. Does this action apply to me?

    You may be potentially affected by this action if you are an
agricultural producer, food manufacturer, or pesticide manufacturer.
The following list of North American Industrial Classification System
(NAICS) codes is not intended to be exhaustive, but rather provides a
guide to help readers determine whether this document applies to them.
Potentially affected entities may include:
     Crop production (NAICS code 111).
     Animal production (NAICS code 112).
     Food manufacturing (NAICS code 311).
     Pesticide manufacturing (NAICS code 32532).

B. How can I get electronic access to other related information?

    You may access a frequently updated electronic version of EPA's
tolerance

regulations at 40 CFR part 180 through the Government Printing Office's
e-CFR site at http://www.ecfr.gov/cgi-bin/text-idx?&c=ecfr&tpl=/ecfrbrowse/Title40/40tab_02.tpl.

C. How can I file an objection or hearing request?

    Under FFDCA section 408(g), 21 U.S.C. 346a, any person may file an
objection to any aspect of this regulation and may also request a
hearing on those objections. You must file your objection or request a
hearing on this regulation in accordance with the instructions provided
in 40 CFR part 178. To ensure proper receipt by EPA, you must identify
docket ID number EPA-HQ-OPP-2013-0138 in the subject line on the first
page of your submission. All objections and requests for a hearing must
be in writing, and must be received by the Hearing Clerk on or before
September 28, 2015. Addresses for mail and hand delivery of objections
and hearing requests are provided in 40 CFR 178.25(b).
    In addition to filing an objection or hearing request with the
Hearing Clerk as described in 40 CFR part 178, please submit a copy of
the filing (excluding any Confidential Business Information (CBI)) for
inclusion in the public docket. Information not marked confidential
pursuant to 40 CFR part 2 may be disclosed publicly by EPA without
prior notice. Submit the non-CBI copy of your objection or hearing
request, identified by docket ID number EPA-HQ-OPP-2013-0138, by one of
the following methods:
     Federal eRulemaking Portal: http://www.regulations.gov.
Follow the online instructions for submitting comments. Do not submit
electronically any information you consider to be CBI or other
information whose disclosure is restricted by statute.
     Mail: OPP Docket, Environmental Protection Agency Docket
Center (EPA/DC), (28221T), 1200 Pennsylvania Ave. NW., Washington, DC
20460-0001.
     Hand Delivery: To make special arrangements for hand
delivery or delivery of boxed information, please follow the
instructions at http://www.epa.gov/dockets/contacts.html. Additional
instructions on commenting or visiting the docket, along with more
information about dockets generally, is available at http://www.epa.gov/dockets.

II. Summary of Petitioned-For Tolerance

    In the Federal Register of June 5, 2013 (78 FR 33785) (FRL-9386-2),
EPA issued a document pursuant to FFDCA section 408(d)(3), 21 U.S.C.
346a(d)(3), announcing the filing of a pesticide petition (PP 3F8142)
by ISK Biosciences Corporation, 7470 Auburn Road, Suite A, Concord,
Ohio 44077. The petition requested that 40 CFR part 180 be amended by
establishing tolerances for residues of the fungicide isofetamid, N-
[1,1-dimethyl-2-[2-methyl-4-(1-methylethoxy)phenyl]-2-oxoethyl]-3-
methyl-2-thiophenecarboxamide in or on almond at 0.02 parts per million
(ppm); almond, hulls at 0.2 ppm; lettuce, head at 6.0 ppm; lettuce,
leaf at 7.0 ppm; low growing berry crop subgroup 13-07G at 4.0 ppm;
rapeseed, crop subgroup 20A at 0.04 ppm; and small fruit vine climbing
crop subgroup 13-07F at 3.0 ppm. That document referenced a summary of
the petition prepared by ISK Biosciences Corporation, the registrant,
which is available in the docket, http://www.regulations.gov. There
were no comments received in response to the notice of filing.
    Based upon review of the data supporting the petition, EPA has
determined that additional tolerances are necessary; revised some of
the proposed tolerances; and corrected some commodity definitions for
the tolerances. The reasons for these changes are explained in Unit
IV.C.

III. Aggregate Risk Assessment and Determination of Safety

    Section 408(b)(2)(A)(i) of FFDCA allows EPA to establish a
tolerance (the legal limit for a pesticide chemical residue in or on a
food) only if EPA determines that the tolerance is ``safe.'' Section
408(b)(2)(A)(ii) of FFDCA defines ``safe'' to mean that ``there is a
reasonable certainty that no harm will result from aggregate exposure
to the pesticide chemical residue, including all anticipated dietary
exposures and all other exposures for which there is reliable
information.'' This includes exposure through drinking water and in
residential settings, but does not include occupational exposure.
Section 408(b)(2)(C) of FFDCA requires EPA to give special
consideration to exposure of infants and children to the pesticide
chemical residue in establishing a tolerance and to ``ensure that there
is a reasonable certainty that no harm will result to infants and
children from aggregate exposure to the pesticide chemical residue. . .
.''
    Consistent with FFDCA section 408(b)(2)(D), and the factors
specified in FFDCA section 408(b)(2)(D), EPA has reviewed the available
scientific data and other relevant information in support of this
action. EPA has sufficient data to assess the hazards of and to make a
determination on aggregate exposure for isofetamid including exposure
resulting from the tolerances established by this action. EPA's
assessment of exposures and risks associated with isofetamid follows.

A. Toxicological Profile

    EPA has evaluated the available toxicity data and considered its
validity, completeness, and reliability as well as the relationship of
the results of the studies to human risk. EPA has also considered
available information concerning the variability of the sensitivities
of major identifiable subgroups of consumers, including infants and
children. The toxicology database is complete for isofetamid. In
repeated dose studies, the liver was the primary target organ in the
rat, mouse, and dog, as indicated by increased liver weights, changes
in the clinical chemistry values, and liver hypertrophy. A second
target organ was the thyroid in the rat and dog, as indicated by
changes in thyroid weights and histopathology. Adrenal weight changes
were observed in the subchronic rat and dog studies. In the rat and
dog, the dose levels where toxicity was observed were similar or higher
in the chronic studies compared with the respective subchronic studies,
showing an absence of progression of liver toxicity with time. There
was no evidence of carcinogenicity in the rat or mouse cancer studies;
the mutagenicity battery was negative. There are no genotoxicity,
neurotoxicity, or immunotoxicity concerns observed in the available
toxicity studies. Developmental toxicity was not observed in the rat or
rabbit, and offspring effects such as decreased body weight were seen
only in the presence of parental toxicity in the multi-generation rat
study. Isofetamid is classified as ``Not Likely to be Carcinogenic to
Humans'' based on the absence of increased tumor incidence in
acceptable/guideline carcinogenicity studies in rats and mice.
Isofetamid is not acutely toxic; it is classified as Toxicity Category
III for acute oral and dermal exposure, and Toxicity Category IV for
inhalation exposure. Furthermore, it is not irritating to the eye or
skin, and it is not a dermal sensitizer. Specific information on the
studies received and the nature of the adverse effects caused by
isofetamid as well as the no-observed-adverse-effect-level (NOAEL) and
the lowest-observed-adverse-effect-level (LOAEL) from the toxicity
studies can be found at http://www.regulations.gov in document
Isofetamid. Aggregate Human Health Risk Assessment for the Proposed New
Uses of the New Active Fungicide,

including Agricultural Uses on Almonds, Lettuce, Small Vine Climbing
Fruits (Crop Subgroup 13-07F), Low Growing Berries (Crop Subgroup 13-
07G), and Rapeseed (Crop Subgroup 20A); and Uses on Turfgrass
(including Golf Courses, Sod Farms, Seed Farms, Recreational Fields,
and Commercial/Residential Lawns) at pages 12-18 in docket ID number
EPA-HQ-OPP-2013-0138.

B. Toxicological Points of Departure/Levels of Concern

    Once a pesticide's toxicological profile is determined, EPA
identifies toxicological points of departure (POD) and levels of
concern to use in evaluating the risk posed by human exposure to the
pesticide. For hazards that have a threshold below which there is no
appreciable risk, the toxicological POD is used as the basis for
derivation of reference values for risk assessment. PODs are developed
based on a careful analysis of the doses in each toxicological study to
determine the dose at which no adverse effects are observed (the NOAEL)
and the lowest dose at which adverse effects of concern are identified
(the LOAEL). Uncertainty/safety factors are used in conjunction with
the POD to calculate a safe exposure level--generally referred to as a
population-adjusted dose (PAD) or a reference dose (RfD)--and a safe
margin of exposure (MOE). For non-threshold risks, the Agency assumes
that any amount of exposure will lead to some degree of risk. Thus, the
Agency estimates risk in terms of the probability of an occurrence of
the adverse effect expected in a lifetime. For more information on the
general principles EPA uses in risk characterization and a complete
description of the risk assessment process, see http://www.epa.gov/pesticides/factsheets/riskassess.htm.
    A summary of the toxicological endpoints for isofetamid used for
human risk assessment is shown in Table 1 of this unit.

  Table 1--Summary of Toxicological Doses and Endpoints for Isofetamid for Use in Human Health Risk Assessment
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
                                    Point of departure
        Exposure/scenario            and uncertainty/     RfD, PAD, LOC for     Study and toxicological effects
                                      safety factors       risk assessment
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Acute Dietary (All Populations)    A toxicity endpoint was not identified.
                                   Toxicological effects attributable to a single exposure (dose) were not
                                    observed in oral toxicity studies.
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Chronic dietary (All populations)  NOAEL = 76.6 mg/kg/   Chronic RfD = 0.77   Reproduction and fertility effects
                                    day                   mg/kg/day            (rat)
                                   UFA = 10X...........  cPAD = 0.77 mg/kg/   LOAEL = 679/775 mg/kg/day based on
                                   UFH = 10X...........   day.                 hepatocellular hypertrophy in the
                                   FQPA SF = 1X........                        liver and follicular cell
                                                                               hypertrophy in the thyroid in
                                                                               both sexes and generations,
                                                                               decreased spleen weights and
                                                                               cytoplasmic eosinophilic
                                                                               inclusion bodies in the liver of
                                                                               F1 males, and decreased pup body
                                                                               weight in both sexes and
                                                                               generations.
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Incidental oral short-term (1 to   NOAEL = 76.6 mg/kg/   Residential LOC for  Reproduction and fertility effects
 30 days) and Incidental oral       day                   MOE = 100.           (rat)
 intermediate-term (1 to 6         UFA = 10X...........                       LOAEL = 679/775 mg/kg/day based on
 months)                           UFH = 10X...........                        hepatocellular hypertrophy in the
                                   FQPA SF = 1X........                        liver and follicular cell
                                                                               hypertrophy in the thyroid in
                                                                               both sexes and generations,
                                                                               decreased spleen weights and
                                                                               cytoplasmic eosinophilic
                                                                               inclusion bodies in the liver of
                                                                               F1 males, and decreased pup body
                                                                               weight in both sexes and
                                                                               generations
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Dermal Short-Term (1-30 days)      A toxicity endpoint was not identified.
                                   Systemic toxicity was not seen in 28-day dermal toxicity in rats up to the
                                    limit dose (1,000 mg/kg/day). There are no concerns for developmental or
                                    reproductive toxicity or neurotoxicity in rat and rabbit studies.
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Inhalation short-term (1 to 30     NOAEL = 76.6 mg/kg/   Residential LOC for  Reproduction and fertility effects
 days)                              day                   MOE = 100            (rat)
                                   UFA = 10X...........                       LOAEL = 679/775 mg/kg/day based on
                                   UFH = 10X...........                        hepatocellular hypertrophy in the
                                   FQPA SF = 1X........                        liver and follicular cell
                                                                               hypertrophy in the thyroid in
                                                                               both sexes and generations,
                                                                               decreased spleen weights and
                                                                               cytoplasmic eosinophilic
                                                                               inclusion bodies in the liver of
                                                                               F1 males, and decreased pup body
                                                                               weight in both sexes and
                                                                               generations.
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Cancer (Oral, dermal, inhalation)  Classification: ``Not likely to be Carcinogenic to Humans'' based on the
                                    absence of significant tumor increases in two adequate rodent
                                    carcinogenicity studies.
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
FQPA SF = Food Quality Protection Act Safety Factor. LOAEL = lowest-observed-adverse-effect-level. LOC = level
  of concern. mg/kg/day = milligram/kilogram/day. MOE = margin of exposure. NOAEL = no-observed-adverse-effect-
  level. PAD = population adjusted dose (a = acute, c = chronic). RfD = reference dose. UF = uncertainty factor.
  UFA = extrapolation from animal to human (interspecies). UFDB = to account for the absence of data or other
  data deficiency. UFH = potential variation in sensitivity among members of the human population
  (intraspecies). UFL = use of a LOAEL to extrapolate a NOAEL. UFS = use of a short-term study for long-term
  risk assessment.

C. Exposure Assessment

    1. Dietary exposure from food and feed uses. EPA assessed dietary
exposures from isofetamid in food as follows:
    i. Acute exposure. Quantitative acute dietary exposure and risk
assessments are performed for a food-use pesticide, if a toxicological
study has indicated the possibility of an effect of concern occurring
as a result of a 1-day or single exposure. No such effects were
identified in the toxicological studies for isofetamid; therefore, a
quantitative acute dietary exposure assessment is unnecessary.

    ii. Chronic exposure. In conducting the chronic dietary exposure
assessment, EPA used the 2003-2008 food consumption data from the
USDA's National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey, What We Eat in
America (NHANES/WWEIA). A partially refined chronic (food and drinking
water) dietary assessment was conducted assuming mean field trial
residues of the combined residues of parent and GPTC for all proposed
crops and 100% CT. Empirical and default processing factors were used
as available.
    iii. Cancer. Based on the data summarized in Unit III.A., EPA has
concluded that isofetamid does not pose a cancer risk to humans.
Therefore, a dietary exposure assessment for the purpose of assessing
cancer risk is unnecessary.
    iv. Anticipated residue and percent crop treated (PCT) information.
EPA did not use PCT information in the dietary assessment for
isofetamid. Mean field trial residues of the combined residues of
parent and GPTC were used.
    2. Dietary exposure from drinking water. The Agency used screening
level water exposure models in the dietary exposure analysis and risk
assessment for isofetamid in drinking water. These simulation models
take into account data on the physical, chemical, and fate/transport
characteristics of isofetamid. Further information regarding EPA
drinking water models used in pesticide exposure assessment can be
found at http://www.epa.gov/oppefed1/models/water/index.htm.
    Based on the Pesticide Flooded Application Model and the Pesticide
Root Zone Model Ground Water (PRZM GW) the estimated drinking water
concentrations (EDWCs) of isofetamid for chronic exposures for non-
cancer assessments are estimated to be 110 ppb for surface water and 43
ppb for ground water.
    Modeled estimates of drinking water concentrations were directly
entered into the dietary exposure model. For chronic dietary risk
assessment, the water concentration value of 110 ppb was used to assess
the contribution from drinking water.
    3. From non-dietary exposure. The term ``residential exposure'' is
used in this document to refer to non-occupational, non-dietary
exposure (e.g., for lawn and garden pest control, indoor pest control,
termiticides, and flea and tick control on pets).
    Isofetamid is currently under review for registering the following
uses that could result in residential exposures: Foliar and systemic
fungicide for control in turfgrass including golf courses, residential
lawns, and recreational turfgrass. Since there may be residential use
sites, residential handler exposure and risk estimates were calculated
for all possible residential exposure scenarios. Including all possible
residential exposure scenarios provides a conservative and health
protective assessment for the potential for homeowners to use the
professionally labeled products on residential use sites. Since there
is no dermal toxicity endpoint, the residential handler assessment only
includes the inhalation route of exposure. Residential handler exposure
is expected to be short-term in duration as a maximum of eight
applications are allowed per year. Thus, intermediate-term exposures
are not likely because of the intermittent nature of applications by
homeowners. Unit exposure values and estimates for area treated or
amount handled were taken from the Agency's 2012 Residential SOPs \1\
(Lawns/Turf). The algorithms used to estimate exposure and dose for
residential handlers can be found in the 2012 Residential SOPs \2\
(Lawns/Turf). Risk estimates of all possible scenarios are not of
concern. Short-term inhalation MOEs range from 850,000 to 18,000,000.
Further information regarding EPA standard assumptions and generic
inputs for residential exposures may be found at http://www.epa.gov/pesticides/trac/science/trac6a05.pdf.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \1\ Available: http://www.epa.gov/pesticides/science/residential-exposure-sop.html.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    4. Cumulative effects from substances with a common mechanism of
toxicity. Section 408(b)(2)(D)(v) of FFDCA requires that, when
considering whether to establish, modify, or revoke a tolerance, the
Agency consider ``available information'' concerning the cumulative
effects of a particular pesticide's residues and ``other substances
that have a common mechanism of toxicity.''
    EPA has not found isofetamid to share a common mechanism of
toxicity with any other substances, and isofetamid does not appear to
produce a toxic metabolite produced by other substances. For the
purposes of this tolerance action, therefore, EPA has assumed that
isofetamid does not have a common mechanism of toxicity with other
substances. For information regarding EPA's efforts to determine which
chemicals have a common mechanism of toxicity and to evaluate the
cumulative effects of such chemicals, see EPA's Web site at http://www.epa.gov/pesticides/cumulative.

D. Safety Factor for Infants and Children

    1. In general. Section 408(b)(2)(C) of FFDCA provides that EPA
shall apply an additional tenfold (10X) margin of safety for infants
and children in the case of threshold effects to account for prenatal
and postnatal toxicity and the completeness of the database on toxicity
and exposure unless EPA determines based on reliable data that a
different margin of safety will be safe for infants and children. This
additional margin of safety is commonly referred to as the FQPA Safety
Factor (SF). In applying this provision, EPA either retains the default
value of 10X, or uses a different additional safety factor when
reliable data available to EPA support the choice of a different
factor.
    2. Prenatal and postnatal sensitivity. There is no evidence of
developmental toxicity or reproductive susceptibility, and there are no
residual uncertainties concerning pre- or post-natal toxicity or
exposure.
    3. Conclusion. EPA has determined that reliable data show the
safety of infants and children would be adequately protected if the
FQPA SF were reduced to 1X. That decision is based on the following
findings:
    i. The toxicity database for isofetamid is complete.
    ii. There is no indication that isofetamid is a neurotoxic chemical
and there is no need for a developmental neurotoxicity study or
additional UFs to account for neurotoxicity.
    iii. There is no evidence that isofetamid results in increased
susceptibility in in utero rats or rabbits in the prenatal
developmental studies or in young rats in the 2-generation reproduction
study.
    iv. There are no residual uncertainties identified in the exposure
databases. The dietary food exposure assessments were performed based
on 100 PCT and average (mean) field trial residues. EPA made
conservative (protective) assumptions in the ground and surface water
modeling used to assess exposure to isofetamid in drinking water. EPA
used similarly conservative assumptions to assess post application
exposure of children as well as incidental oral exposure of toddlers.
These assessments will not underestimate the exposure and risks posed
by isofetamid.

E. Aggregate Risks and Determination of Safety

    EPA determines whether acute and chronic dietary pesticide
exposures are safe by comparing aggregate exposure estimates to the
acute PAD (aPAD) and chronic PAD (cPAD). For linear cancer

risks, EPA calculates the lifetime probability of acquiring cancer
given the estimated aggregate exposure. Short-, intermediate-, and
chronic-term risks are evaluated by comparing the estimated aggregate
food, water, and residential exposure to the appropriate PODs to ensure
that an adequate MOE exists.
    1. Acute risk. An acute aggregate risk assessment takes into
account acute exposure estimates from dietary consumption of food and
drinking water. No adverse effect resulting from a single oral exposure
was identified and no acute dietary endpoint was selected. Therefore,
isofetamid is not expected to pose an acute risk.
    2. Chronic risk. Using the exposure assumptions described in this
unit for chronic exposure, EPA has concluded that chronic exposure to
isofetamid from food and water will utilize <1% of the cPAD for
children (1-2 years old), the population group receiving the greatest
exposure. Based on the explanation in Unit III.C.3., regarding
residential use patterns, chronic residential exposure to residues of
isofetamid is not expected.
    3. Short-term risk. Short-term aggregate exposure takes into
account short-term residential exposure plus chronic exposure to food
and water (considered to be a background exposure level). Isofetamid is
currently registered for uses that could result in short-term
residential exposure, and the Agency has determined that it is
appropriate to aggregate chronic exposure through food and water with
short-term residential exposures to isofetamid.
    Using the exposure assumptions described in this unit for short-
term exposures, EPA has concluded the combined short-term food, water,
and residential exposures result in aggregate MOEs of 24,000 and 3,900
for adults and children (1-2 years old) respectively. Because EPA's
level of concern for isofetamid is a MOE of 100 or below, these MOEs
are not of concern.
    4. Intermediate-term risk. Intermediate-term aggregate exposure
takes into account intermediate-term residential exposure plus chronic
exposure to food and water (considered to be a background exposure
level). An intermediate-term adverse effect was identified; however,
isofetamid is not registered for any use patterns that would result in
intermediate-term residential exposure. Intermediate-term risk is
assessed based on intermediate-term residential exposure plus chronic
dietary exposure. Because there is no intermediate-term residential
exposure and chronic dietary exposure has already been assessed under
the appropriately protective cPAD (which is at least as protective as
the POD used to assess intermediate-term risk), no further assessment
of intermediate-term risk is necessary, and EPA relies on the chronic
dietary risk assessment for evaluating intermediate-term risk for
isofetamid.
    5. Aggregate cancer risk for U.S. population. Based on the lack of
evidence of carcinogenicity in two adequate rodent carcinogenicity
studies, isofetamid is not expected to pose a cancer risk to humans.
    6. Determination of safety. Based on these risk assessments, EPA
concludes that there is a reasonable certainty that no harm will result
to the general population, or to infants and children from aggregate
exposure to isofetamid residues.

IV. Other Considerations

A. Analytical Enforcement Methodology

    Adequate enforcement methodology liquid chromatography with tandem
mass spectrometry (LC-MS/MS) method (Document Number JSM0119; MRID
49011967) is available to enforce the tolerance expression.

B. International Residue Limits

    In making its tolerance decisions, EPA seeks to harmonize U.S.
tolerances with international standards whenever possible, consistent
with U.S. food safety standards and agricultural practices. EPA
considers the international maximum residue limits (MRLs) established
by the Codex Alimentarius Commission (Codex), as required by FFDCA
section 408(b)(4). The Codex Alimentarius is a joint United Nations
Food and Agriculture Organization/World Health Organization food
standards program, and it is recognized as an international food safety
standards-setting organization in trade agreements to which the United
States is a party. EPA may establish a tolerance that is different from
a Codex MRL; however, FFDCA section 408(b)(4) requires that EPA explain
the reasons for departing from the Codex level.
    The Codex has not established any MRLs for isofetamid. Canada is
concurrently establishing tolerances for all of the same commodities
identified in this document except almond hulls because Canada does not
set tolerances on livestock feed commodities. Canada's recommended
tolerance levels for these commodities are the same as the U.S.
established tolerance levels. The tolerance expression for the U.S. and
Canada is the same, with isofetamid as the residue of concern for
primary crops.

C. Revisions to Petitioned-For Tolerances

    The Agency has made revisions to some of the petitioned-for
tolerance levels based on the following reasons:
    1. Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development (OECD)
tolerance calculation procedures;
    2. The parent only is the residue of concern for primary crop
tolerances rather than parent and the metabolite GPTC; and
    3. The concentration of residues in two processed commodities.
    Since all residues of isofetamid (parent) were nondetectable (<0.01
ppm) in almond nutmeat and hulls, the proposed tolerances of 0.02 ppm
for almond (nutmeat) and 0.2 ppm for almond hulls will both be reduced
to 0.01 ppm, the limit of quantitation of the analytical method.
    Based on the OECD tolerance calculation procedures, the proposed
tolerance for head lettuce of 6.0 ppm will be reduced to 5.0 ppm. Based
on the OECD tolerance calculation procedures, the proposed tolerance
for the rapeseed subgroup 20A of 0.04 ppm will be reduced to 0.015 ppm.
    The petitioner did not propose tolerances for the processed
commodities, canola oil and raisins. Since residues concentrate
significantly in canola oil and raisins, tolerances will be established
at 0.03 ppm for canola, refined oil, and 5.0 ppm for grape, raisin.
These Agency recommendations are based on the highest average field
trial (HAFT) residues for canola seed and grape and the processing
factors for canola oil and raisins. The petitioner did not propose
tolerances for flaxseed oil, mustard seed oil, or sesame oil. However,
flaxseed, mustard seed, and sesame are members of the rapeseed subgroup
20A, with canola as the representative crop, and treated commodities
could be processed to produce sesame oil, mustard seed oil and flaxseed
oil. Therefore, the Agency is also establishing tolerances for residues
in flaxseed oil, mustard seed oil, and sesame oil. Tolerances are being
established at 0.03 ppm, the same level as for refined canola oil.
    Additionally, some of the requested tolerances have been corrected.
Almond has been revised from 0.02 ppm to 0.01 ppm; almond, hulls from
0.2 ppm to 0.01 ppm; lettuce, head from 6.0 ppm to 5.0 ppm; and
rapeseed, subgroup 20A from 0.04 ppm to 0.015 ppm. The Agency is
setting tolerances on some processed commodities that were not

proposed by the petitioner including canola, refined oil at 0.03 ppm;
flax, seed, oil at 0.03 ppm; grape, raisin at 5.0 ppm; mustard, seed,
oil at 0.03 ppm and sesame, oil at 0.03 ppm.

V. Conclusion

    Therefore, tolerances are established for residues of isofetamid,
in or on almond at 0.01 ppm; almond, hulls at 0.01 ppm; canola, refined
oil at 0.03 ppm; flax, seed, oil at 0.03 ppm; grape, raisin at 5.0 ppm;
lettuce, head at 5.0 ppm; lettuce, leaf at 7.0 ppm; berry, low growing,
subgroup 13-07G at 4.0 ppm; mustard, seed, oil at 0.03 ppm; rapeseed
subgroup 20A at 0.015 ppm; sesame, oil at 0.03 ppm; and fruit, small
vine climbing, except fuzzy kiwifruit, subgroup 13-07F at 3.0 ppm.

VI. Statutory and Executive Order Reviews

    This action establishes tolerances under FFDCA section 408(d) in
response to a petition submitted to the Agency. The Office of
Management and Budget (OMB) has exempted these types of actions from
review under Executive Order 12866, entitled ``Regulatory Planning and
Review'' (58 FR 51735, October 4, 1993). Because this action has been
exempted from review under Executive Order 12866, this action is not
subject to Executive Order 13211, entitled ``Actions Concerning
Regulations That Significantly Affect Energy Supply, Distribution, or
Use'' (66 FR 28355, May 22, 2001) or Executive Order 13045, entitled
``Protection of Children from Environmental Health Risks and Safety
Risks'' (62 FR 19885, April 23, 1997). This action does not contain any
information collections subject to OMB approval under the Paperwork
Reduction Act (PRA) (44 U.S.C. 3501 et seq.), nor does it require any
special considerations under Executive Order 12898, entitled ``Federal
Actions to Address Environmental Justice in Minority Populations and
Low-Income Populations'' (59 FR 7629, February 16, 1994).
    Since tolerances and exemptions that are established on the basis
of a petition under FFDCA section 408(d), such as the tolerance in this
final rule, do not require the issuance of a proposed rule, the
requirements of the Regulatory Flexibility Act (RFA) (5 U.S.C. 601 et
seq.), do not apply.
    This action directly regulates growers, food processors, food
handlers, and food retailers, not States or tribes, nor does this
action alter the relationships or distribution of power and
responsibilities established by Congress in the preemption provisions
of FFDCA section 408(n)(4). As such, the Agency has determined that
this action will not have a substantial direct effect on States or
tribal governments, on the relationship between the national government
and the States or tribal governments, or on the distribution of power
and responsibilities among the various levels of government or between
the Federal Government and Indian tribes. Thus, the Agency has
determined that Executive Order 13132, entitled ``Federalism'' (64 FR
43255, August 10, 1999) and Executive Order 13175, entitled
``Consultation and Coordination with Indian Tribal Governments'' (65 FR
67249, November 9, 2000) do not apply to this action. In addition, this
action does not impose any enforceable duty or contain any unfunded
mandate as described under Title II of the Unfunded Mandates Reform Act
(UMRA) (2 U.S.C. 1501 et seq.).
    This action does not involve any technical standards that would
require Agency consideration of voluntary consensus standards pursuant
to section 12(d) of the National Technology Transfer and Advancement
Act (NTTAA) (15 U.S.C. 272 note).

VII. Congressional Review Act

    Pursuant to the Congressional Review Act (5 U.S.C. 801 et seq.),
EPA will submit a report containing this rule and other required
information to the U.S. Senate, the U.S. House of Representatives, and
the Comptroller General of the United States prior to publication of
the rule in the Federal Register. This action is not a ``major rule''
as defined by 5 U.S.C. 804(2).

List of Subjects in 40 CFR Part 180

    Environmental protection, Administrative practice and procedure,
Agricultural commodities, Pesticides and pests, Reporting and
recordkeeping requirements.

    Dated: July 21, 2015.
Jack Housenger,
Director, Office of Pesticide Programs.

    Therefore, 40 CFR chapter I is amended as follows:

PART 180--[AMENDED]

0
1. The authority citation for part 180 continues to read as follows:

    Authority:  21 U.S.C. 321(q), 346a and 371.

0
2. Add Sec.  180.681 to subpart C to read as follows:

Sec.  [emsp14]180.681  Isofetamid; tolerances for residues.

    (a) General. Tolerances are established for residues of the
fungicide isofetamid, including its metabolites and degradates, in or
on the commodities in the table below. Compliance with the tolerance
levels specified below is to be determined by measuring only
isofetamid, N-[1,1-dimethyl-2-[2-methyl-4-(1-methylethoxy)phenyl]-2-
oxoethyl]-3-methyl-2-thiophenecarboxamide, in or on the following
commodities:

------------------------------------------------------------------------
                                                             Parts per
                        Commodity                             million
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Almond..................................................            0.01
Almond, hulls...........................................            0.01
Berry, low growing, subgroup 13-07G.....................             4.0
Canola, refined oil.....................................            0.03
Flax, seed, oil.........................................            0.03
Fruit, small vine climbing, except fuzzy kiwifruit,                  3.0
 subgroup 13-07F........................................
Grape, raisin...........................................             5.0
Lettuce, head...........................................             5.0
Lettuce, leaf...........................................             7.0
Mustard, seed, oil......................................            0.03
Rapeseed subgroup 20A...................................           0.015
Sesame, oil.............................................            0.03
------------------------------------------------------------------------

    (b) Section 18 emergency exemptions. [Reserved]
    (c) Tolerances with regional registrations. [Reserved]
    (d) Indirect or inadvertent residues. [Reserved]
[FR Doc. 2015-18738 Filed 7-29-15; 8:45 am]
 BILLING CODE 6560-50-P