[Federal Register Volume 76, Number 185 (Friday, September 23, 2011)]
[Proposed Rules]
[Pages 59067-59069]
[FR Doc No: 2011-24432]

=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION

Federal Aviation Administration

14 CFR Part 39

[Docket No. FAA-2011-0992; Directorate Identifier 2011-NM-126-AD]
RIN 2120-AA64

Airworthiness Directives; Bombardier, Inc. Model CL-600-2B16 (CL-
601-3A, CL-601-3R, and CL-604 Variants) Airplanes

AGENCY: Federal Aviation Administration (FAA), DOT.

ACTION: Notice of proposed rulemaking (NPRM).

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: We propose to adopt a new airworthiness directive (AD) for the
products listed above. This proposed AD results from mandatory
continuing airworthiness information (MCAI) originated by an aviation
authority of another country to identify and correct an unsafe
condition on an aviation product. The MCAI describes the unsafe
condition as:

    Three (3) events have occurred where the Air-Driven Generator
(ADG) failed to provide power on CL-600-2B19 (CRJ) aeroplanes during
their regularly scheduled operational/functional checks. An
investigation revealed that in all cases, the silver-plated copper
wires within the ADG power feeder cables were damaged due to
galvanic corrosion. It was subsequently determined that the silver-
plating is inadequate for this application.
    In the event of damage to the power feeder cable wires, the ADG
may not be able to provide emergency electrical power to the
aeroplane.
    Although there have been no reported failures to date on any CL-
600-2B16 (604 Variant) aeroplanes, a sampling program carried out on
these aeroplanes showed signs of microscopic galvanic corrosion on
the ADG power feeder cable wires.
* * * * *

The proposed AD would require actions that are intended to address the
unsafe condition described in the MCAI.

DATES: We must receive comments on this proposed AD by November 7,
2011.

ADDRESSES: You may send comments by any of the following methods:
     Federal eRulemaking Portal: Go to http://www.regulations.gov. Follow the instructions for submitting comments.
     Fax:<PHONE_NUMBER>.
     Mail: U.S. Department of Transportation, Docket
Operations, M-30, West Building Ground Floor, Room W12-140, 1200 New
Jersey Avenue, SE., Washington, DC 20590.
     Hand Delivery: U.S. Department of Transportation, Docket
Operations, M-30, West Building Ground Floor,

Room W12-140, 1200 New Jersey Avenue, SE., Washington, DC, between 9
a.m. and 5 p.m., Monday through Friday, except Federal holidays.
    For service information identified in this proposed AD, contact
Bombardier, Inc., 400 C[ocirc]te-Vertu Road West, Dorval, Qu[eacute]bec
H4S 1Y9, Canada; telephone<PHONE_NUMBER>; fax<PHONE_NUMBER>; e-mail
<EMAIL_ADDRESS>Internet http://www.bombardier.com. You
may review copies of the referenced service information at the FAA,
Transport Airplane Directorate, 1601 Lind Avenue, SW., Renton,
Washington. For information on the availability of this material at the
FAA, call<PHONE_NUMBER>.

Examining the AD Docket

    You may examine the AD docket on the Internet at http://www.regulations.gov; or in person at the Docket Operations office
between 9 a.m. and 5 p.m., Monday through Friday, except Federal
holidays. The AD docket contains this proposed AD, the regulatory
evaluation, any comments received, and other information. The street
address for the Docket Operations office (telephone<PHONE_NUMBER>) is
in the ADDRESSES section. Comments will be available in the AD docket
shortly after receipt.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Assata Dessaline, Aerospace Engineer,
Avionics and Flight Test Branch, ANE-172, FAA, New York Aircraft
Certification Office, 1600 Stewart Avenue, Suite 410, Westbury, New
York 11590; telephone<PHONE_NUMBER>; fax<PHONE_NUMBER>.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

Comments Invited

    We invite you to send any written relevant data, views, or
arguments about this proposed AD. Send your comments to an address
listed under the ADDRESSES section. Include ``Docket No. FAA-2011-0992;
Directorate Identifier 2011-NM-126-AD'' at the beginning of your
comments. We specifically invite comments on the overall regulatory,
economic, environmental, and energy aspects of this proposed AD. We
will consider all comments received by the closing date and may amend
this proposed AD based on those comments.
    We will post all comments we receive, without change, to http://www.regulations.gov, including any personal information you provide. We
will also post a report summarizing each substantive verbal contact we
receive about this proposed AD.

Discussion

    The Transport Canada Civil Aviation (TCCA), which is the aviation
authority for Canada, has issued Canadian Airworthiness Directive CF-
2011-08, dated April 28, 2011 (referred to after this as ``the MCAI''),
to correct an unsafe condition for the specified products. The MCAI
states:

    Three (3) events have occurred where the Air-Driven Generator
(ADG) failed to provide power on CL-600-2B19 (CRJ) aeroplanes during
their regularly scheduled operational/functional checks. An
investigation revealed that in all cases, the silver-plated copper
wires within the ADG power feeder cables were damaged due to
galvanic corrosion. It was subsequently determined that the silver-
plating is inadequate for this application.
    In the event of damage to the power feeder cable wires, the ADG
may not be able to provide emergency electrical power to the
aeroplane.
    Although there have been no reported failures to date on any CL-
600-2B16 (604 Variant) aeroplanes, a sampling program carried out on
these aeroplanes showed signs of microscopic galvanic corrosion on
the ADG power feeder cable wires.
    This directive is issued to correct this potentially unsafe
condition by mandating the replacement of all ADG power feeder
cables * * * with an ADG power feeder cable that contains tin-plated
copper wires.

    You may obtain further information by examining the MCAI in the AD
docket.

Relevant Service Information

    Bombardier has issued Service Bulletin 604-24-024, dated January
31, 2011. The actions described in this service information are
intended to correct the unsafe condition identified in the MCAI.

FAA's Determination and Requirements of This Proposed AD

    This product has been approved by the aviation authority of another
country, and is approved for operation in the United States. Pursuant
to our bilateral agreement with the State of Design Authority, we have
been notified of the unsafe condition described in the MCAI and service
information referenced above. We are proposing this AD because we
evaluated all pertinent information and determined an unsafe condition
exists and is likely to exist or develop on other products of the same
type design.

Differences Between This AD and the MCAI or Service Information

    We have reviewed the MCAI and related service information and, in
general, agree with their substance. But we might have found it
necessary to use different words from those in the MCAI to ensure the
AD is clear for U.S. operators and is enforceable. In making these
changes, we do not intend to differ substantively from the information
provided in the MCAI and related service information.
    We might also have proposed different actions in this AD from those
in the MCAI in order to follow FAA policies. Any such differences are
highlighted in a NOTE within the proposed AD.

Costs of Compliance

    Based on the service information, we estimate that this proposed AD
would affect about 72 products of U.S. registry. We also estimate that
it would take about 24 work-hours per product to comply with the basic
requirements of this proposed AD. The average labor rate is $85 per
work-hour. Required parts would cost about $1,897 per product. Where
the service information lists required parts costs that are covered
under warranty, we have assumed that there will be no charge for these
parts. As we do not control warranty coverage for affected parties,
some parties may incur costs higher than estimated here. Based on these
figures, we estimate the cost of the proposed AD on U.S. operators to
be $283,464, or $3,937 per product.

Authority for This Rulemaking

    Title 49 of the United States Code specifies the FAA's authority to
issue rules on aviation safety. Subtitle I, section 106, describes the
authority of the FAA Administrator. ``Subtitle VII: Aviation
Programs,'' describes in more detail the scope of the Agency's
authority.
    We are issuing this rulemaking under the authority described in
``Subtitle VII, Part A, Subpart III, Section 44701: General
requirements.'' Under that section, Congress charges the FAA with
promoting safe flight of civil aircraft in air commerce by prescribing
regulations for practices, methods, and procedures the Administrator
finds necessary for safety in air commerce. This regulation is within
the scope of that authority because it addresses an unsafe condition
that is likely to exist or develop on products identified in this
rulemaking action.

Regulatory Findings

    We determined that this proposed AD would not have federalism
implications under Executive Order 13132. This proposed AD would not
have a substantial direct effect on the States, on the relationship
between the national Government and the States, or on the distribution
of power and

responsibilities among the various levels of government.
    For the reasons discussed above, I certify this proposed
regulation:
    1. Is not a ``significant regulatory action'' under Executive Order
12866;
    2. Is not a ``significant rule'' under the DOT Regulatory Policies
and Procedures (44 FR 11034, February 26, 1979); and
    3. Will not have a significant economic impact, positive or
negative, on a substantial number of small entities under the criteria
of the Regulatory Flexibility Act.
    We prepared a regulatory evaluation of the estimated costs to
comply with this proposed AD and placed it in the AD docket.

List of Subjects in 14 CFR Part 39

    Air transportation, Aircraft, Aviation safety, Incorporation by
reference, Safety.

The Proposed Amendment

    Accordingly, under the authority delegated to me by the
Administrator, the FAA proposes to amend 14 CFR part 39 as follows:

PART 39--AIRWORTHINESS DIRECTIVES

    1. The authority citation for part 39 continues to read as follows:

    Authority:  49 U.S.C. 106(g), 40113, 44701.

Sec.  39.13  [Amended]

    2. The FAA amends Sec.  39.13 by adding the following new AD:

Bombardier, Inc.: Docket No. FAA-2011-0992; Directorate Identifier
2011-NM-126-AD.

Comments Due Date

    (a) We must receive comments by November 7, 2011.

Affected ADs

    (b) None.

Applicability

    (c) This AD applies to Bombardier, Inc. Model CL-600-2B16 (CL-
601-3A, CL-601-3R, & CL-604 Variants) airplanes, certificated in any
category, serial numbers 5301, 5302, 5305 through 5318 inclusive,
5320 through 5328 inclusive, 5331 through 5349 inclusive, 5351
through 5367 inclusive, 5369 through 5408 inclusive, 5410, 5412
through 5426 inclusive, 5428 through 5438 inclusive, 5440 through
5489 inclusive, 5491 through 5498 inclusive, 5500 through 5517
inclusive, 5519 through 5522 inclusive, and 5524 through 5665
inclusive.

Subject

    (d) Air Transport Association (ATA) of America Code 24:
Electrical power.

Reason

    (e) The mandatory continuing airworthiness information (MCAI)
states:

    Three (3) events have occurred where the Air-Driven Generator
(ADG) failed to provide power on CL-600-2B19 (CRJ) aeroplanes during
their regularly scheduled operational/functional checks. An
investigation revealed that in all cases, the silver-plated copper
wires within the ADG power feeder cables were damaged due to
galvanic corrosion. It was subsequently determined that the silver-
plating is inadequate for this application.
    In the event of damage to the power feeder cable wires, the ADG
may not be able to provide emergency electrical power to the
aeroplane.
    Although there have been no reported failures to date on any CL-
600-2B16 (604 Variant) aeroplanes, a sampling program carried out on
these aeroplanes showed signs of microscopic galvanic corrosion on
the ADG power feeder cable wires.
* * * * *

Compliance

    (f) You are responsible for having the actions required by this
AD performed within the compliance times specified, unless the
actions have already been done.

Actions

    (g) Within 72 months after the effective date of this AD,
replace the ADG power feeder cable, in accordance with the
Accomplishment Instructions of Bombardier Service Bulletin 604-24-
024, dated January 31, 2011.

FAA AD Differences

    Note 1:  This AD differs from the MCAI and/or service
information as follows: No differences.

Other FAA AD Provisions

    (h) The following provisions also apply to this AD:
    (1) Alternative Methods of Compliance (AMOCs): The Manager, New
York Aircraft Certification Office (ACO), ANE-170, FAA, has the
authority to approve AMOCs for this AD, if requested using the
procedures found in 14 CFR 39.19. In accordance with 14 CFR 39.19,
send your request to your principal inspector or local Flight
Standards District Office, as appropriate. If sending information
directly to the ACO, send it to ATTN: Program Manager, Continuing
Operational Safety, FAA, New York ACO, 1600 Stewart Avenue, Suite
410, Westbury, New York 11590; telephone<PHONE_NUMBER>; fax 516-794-
5531. Before using any approved AMOC, notify your appropriate
principal inspector, or lacking a principal inspector, the manager
of the local flight standards district office/certificate holding
district office. The AMOC approval letter must specifically
reference this AD.
    (2) Airworthy Product: For any requirement in this AD to obtain
corrective actions from a manufacturer or other source, use these
actions if they are FAA-approved. Corrective actions are considered
FAA-approved if they are approved by the State of Design Authority
(or their delegated agent). You are required to assure the product
is airworthy before it is returned to service.

Related Information

    (i) Refer to MCAI Transport Canada Civil Aviation (TCCA)
Airworthiness Directive CF-2011-08, dated April 28, 2011; and
Bombardier Service Bulletin 604-24-024, dated January 31, 2011; for
related information.

    Issued in Renton, Washington on September 16, 2011.
Ali Bahrami,
Manager, Transport Airplane Directorate, Aircraft Certification
Service.
[FR Doc. 2011-24432 Filed 9-22-11; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910-13-P


[Federal Register: September 30, 2008 (Volume 73, Number 190)]
[Notices]
[Page 56816-56817]
[DOCID:fr30se08-51]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission

[Docket No. EF08-5041-000]

Western Area Power Administration; Notice of Filing

September 22, 2008.
    Take notice that on September 16, 2008, the Deputy Secretary of the
Department of Energy submitted Rate Order No. WAPA-138, confirmed and
approved on an interim basis, effective October 1, 2008, Rate Schedules
PD-F7 for firm power from the Parker-Davis Project, PD-FT7 for firm
point-to-point transmission on the same system, PD-FCT7 for firm point-
to-point transmission of Salt Lake City Area Integrated Projects power
on the P-DP, and PD-NFT7 for non-firm transmission service on the same
system, and submitted for confirmation and approval on a final basis,
under the authority vested in the Commission by Delegation Order No.
00-037.00, Rate Schedules PD-F7, PD-FT7. PD-FCT7, and PD-NFT7,
effective October 1, 2008 and ending September 30, 2013.
    Any person desiring to intervene or to protest this filing must
file in accordance with Rules 211 and 214 of the Commission's Rules of
Practice and Procedure (18 CFR 385.211, 385.214). Protests will be
considered by the Commission in determining the appropriate action to
be taken, but will not serve to make protestants parties to the
proceeding. Any person wishing to become a party must file a notice of
intervention or motion to intervene, as appropriate. Such notices,
motions, or protests must be filed on or before the comment date. On or
before the comment date, it is not necessary to serve motions to
intervene or protests on persons other than the Applicant.
    The Commission encourages electronic submission of protests and
interventions in lieu of paper using the ``eFiling'' link at http://
www.ferc.gov. Persons unable to file electronically should submit an
original and 14 copies of the protest or intervention to the Federal
Energy Regulatory Commission,

888 First Street, NE., Washington, DC 20426.
    This filing is accessible on-line at http://www.ferc.gov, using the
``eLibrary'' link and is available for review in the Commission's
Public Reference Room in Washington, DC. There is an ``eSubscription''
link on the Web site that enables subscribers to receive e-mail
notification when a document is added to a subscribed docket(s). For
assistance with any FERC Online service, please e-mail
<EMAIL_ADDRESS>or call<PHONE_NUMBER> (toll free). For
TTY, call<PHONE_NUMBER>.
    Comment Date: 5 p.m. Eastern Time on October 16, 2008.

Nathaniel J. Davis, Sr.,
Deputy Secretary.
[FR Doc. E8-22856 Filed 9-29-08; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 6717-01-P


[Federal Register Volume 76, Number 102 (Thursday, May 26, 2011)]
[Notices]
[Page 30738]
[FR Doc No: 2011-13032]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY

Federal Emergency Management Agency

[Internal Agency Docket No. FEMA-1971-DR; Docket ID FEMA-2011-0001]

Alabama; Amendment No. 13 to Notice of a Major Disaster
Declaration

AGENCY: Federal Emergency Management Agency, DHS.

ACTION: Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: This notice amends the notice of a major disaster declaration
for the State of Alabama (FEMA-1971-DR), dated April 28, 2011, and
related determinations.

DATES: Effective Date: May 17, 2011.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Peggy Miller, Office of Response and
Recovery, Federal Emergency Management Agency, 500 C Street, SW.,
Washington, DC 20472,<PHONE_NUMBER>.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The notice of a major disaster declaration
for the State of Alabama is hereby amended to include the following
areas among those areas determined to have been adversely affected by
the event declared a major disaster by the President in his declaration
of April 28, 2011.

    Lamar and Tuscaloosa Counties for Public Assistance [Categories
C-G], (already designated for Individual Assistance and assistance
for debris removal and emergency protective measures [Categories A
and B], including direct Federal assistance, under the Public
Assistance program).

    The following Catalog of Federal Domestic Assistance Numbers
(CFDA) are to be used for reporting and drawing funds: 97.030,
Community Disaster Loans; 97.031, Cora Brown Fund; 97.032, Crisis
Counseling; 97.033, Disaster Legal Services; 97.034, Disaster
Unemployment Assistance (DUA); 97.046, Fire Management Assistance
Grant; 97.048, Disaster Housing Assistance to Individuals and
Households In Presidentially Declared Disaster Areas; 97.049,
Presidentially Declared Disaster Assistance--Disaster Housing
Operations for Individuals and Households; 97.050, Presidentially
Declared Disaster Assistance to Individuals and Households--Other
Needs; 97.036, Disaster Grants--Public Assistance (Presidentially
Declared Disasters); 97.039, Hazard Mitigation Grant.

W. Craig Fugate,
Administrator, Federal Emergency Management Agency.
[FR Doc. 2011-13032 Filed 5-25-11; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 9111-23-P


[Federal Register: June 25, 2008 (Volume 73, Number 123)]
[Notices]
[Page 36098]
[DOCID:fr25jn08-106]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY

Federal Emergency Management Agency

[FEMA-1763-DR]

Iowa; Amendment No. 5 to Notice of a Major Disaster Declaration

AGENCY: Federal Emergency Management Agency, DHS.

ACTION: Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: This notice amends the notice of a major disaster declaration
for the State of Iowa (FEMA-1763-DR), dated May 27, 2008, and related
determinations.

EFFECTIVE DATE: June 17, 2008.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Peggy Miller, Disaster Assistance
Directorate, Federal Emergency Management Agency, 500 C Street, SW,
Washington, DC 20472,<PHONE_NUMBER>.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The notice of a major disaster declaration
for the State of Iowa is hereby amended to include the following areas
among those areas determined to have been adversely affected by the
catastrophe declared a major disaster by the President in his
declaration of May 27, 2008.

    Allamakee, Des Moines, Fremont, and Harrison Counties for
Individual Assistance.
    Clayton County for Individual Assistance and Public Assistance.
    Adams, Linn, and Winneshiek Counties for Public Assistance
(already designated for Individual Assistance).
    Grundy, Howard, Iowa, Marshall, Mitchell, Ringgold, Worth, and
Wright Counties for Public Assistance.

(The following Catalog of Federal Domestic Assistance Numbers (CFDA)
are to be used for reporting and drawing funds: 97.030, Community
Disaster Loans; 97.031, Cora Brown Fund; 97.032, Crisis Counseling;
97.033, Disaster Legal Services; 97.034, Disaster Unemployment
Assistance (DUA); 97.046, Fire Management Assistance Grant; 97.048,
Disaster Housing Assistance to Individuals and Households in
Presidential Declared Disaster Areas; 97.049, Presidential Declared
Disaster Assistance--Disaster Housing Operations for Individuals and
Households; 97.050, Presidential Declared Disaster Assistance to
Individuals and Households--Other Needs; 97.036, Disaster Grants--
Public Assistance (Presidentially Declared Disasters); 97.039,
Hazard Mitigation Grant.)

R. David Paulison,
Administrator, Federal Emergency Management Agency.
 [FR Doc. E8-14358 Filed 6-24-08; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 9110-10-P


[Federal Register Volume 87, Number 199 (Monday, October 17, 2022)]
[Notices]
[Pages 62924-62925]
[FR Doc No: 2022-22483]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION

Pipeline and Hazardous Materials Safety Administration

Hazardous Materials: Notice of Actions on Special Permits

AGENCY: Pipeline and Hazardous Materials Safety Administration (PHMSA),
DOT.

ACTION: Notice of actions on special permit applications.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: In accordance with the procedures governing the application
for, and the processing of, special permits from the Department of
Transportation's Hazardous Material Regulations, notice is hereby given
that the Office of Hazardous Materials Safety has received the
application described herein.

DATES: Comments must be received on or before November 16, 2022

ADDRESSES: Record Center, Pipeline and Hazardous Materials Safety
Administration U.S. Department of Transportation Washington, DC 20590.
    Comments should refer to the application number and be submitted in
triplicate. If confirmation of receipt of comments is desired, include
a self-addressed stamped postcard showing the special permit number.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Donald Burger, Chief, Office of
Hazardous Materials Safety General Approvals and Permits Branch,
Pipeline and Hazardous Materials Safety Administration, U.S. Department
of Transportation, East Building, PHH-13, 1200 New Jersey Avenue
Southeast, Washington, DC 20590-0001,<PHONE_NUMBER>.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Copies of the applications are available for
inspection in the Records Center, East Building, PHH-13, 1200 New
Jersey Avenue Southeast, Washington, DC.
    This notice of receipt of applications for special permit is
published in accordance with part 107 of the Federal hazardous
materials transportation law (49 U.S.C. 5117(b); 49 CFR 1.53(b)).

    Issued in Washington, DC, on October 06, 2022.
Donald P. Burger,
Chief, General Approvals and Permits Branch.

----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
                                                                                Nature of the special permits
       Application No.                 Applicant          Regulation(s) affected              thereof
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
                                          SPECIAL PERMITS DATA--Granted
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
14546-M......................  Linde Gas & Equipment     180.209(a), 180.209(b),   To modify the special permit
                                Inc.                      180.209(b)(1)(iv).        to authorize a 15-year
                                                                                periodic requalification
                                                                                interval for certain
                                                                                cylinders.
15146-M......................  Tech Spray L P..........  172.200, 172.400,         To modify the permit to
                                                          172.500, 173.304(a).      include additional hazardous
                                                                                materials.
16365-M......................  RDS Manufacturing, Inc..  177.834(h),               To modify the special permit
                                                          178.700(c)(1).            to authorize two additional
                                                                                packagings.
20482-M......................  Solid Power Operating,    173.35(e)...............  To modify the special permit
                                Inc.                                                to authorize an additional
                                                                                hazardous material.
21259-N......................  Quantum Fuel Systems LLC  173.302(a)(1)...........  To authorize the manufacture,
                                                                                mark, sale, and use of a non-
                                                                                DOT specification fully
                                                                                wrapped fiber reinforced
                                                                                composite gas cylinder with
                                                                                a non-load sharing plastic
                                                                                liner. Except as specified,
                                                                                the cylinder is designed in
                                                                                accordance with the ISO
                                                                                11515:2013 Standard for the
                                                                                transportation in commerce
                                                                                of the hazardous materials
                                                                                authorized herein.

21373-N......................  Sigma-Aldrich Co. LLC...  172.203(a), 172.203(c),   To authorize the
                                                          172.704.                  transportation in commerce
                                                                                of hazardous materials
                                                                                packaged in UN 4G and 4GV
                                                                                fiberboard boxes that have
                                                                                been partially closed by
                                                                                hazardous materials
                                                                                employees who are not
                                                                                trained in accordance with
                                                                                Subpart H of Part 172.
21383-N......................  Emergency Environmental   173.185(f)..............  To authorize the
                                Services, LLC.                                      transportation in commerce
                                                                                of damaged lithium batteries
                                                                                in non-spec packaging.
21385-N......................  Williams Advanced         172.101(j),               To authorize the
                                Engineering Limited.      173.185(a)(1),            transportation in commerce
                                                          173.185(b)(6).            of prototype and low
                                                                                production lithium ion
                                                                                batteries exceeding 35 kg
                                                                                net weight aboard cargo-only
                                                                                aircraft for testing.
21429-N......................  US Bureau of Customs and  180.205.................  To authorize the
                                Border Protection.                                  transportation in commerce
                                                                                of certain cylinders that
                                                                                are past their test date for
                                                                                requalification.
21440-N......................  Victoria Police.........  175.75(b)...............  To authorize the
                                                                                transportation in commerce
                                                                                of a Division 6.1 hazardous
                                                                                material in the cabin of a
                                                                                passenger-carrying aircraft.
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
                                          SPECIAL PERMITS DATA--Denied
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
21262-N......................  The Chemours Company FC   173.301(f)(2),            To authorize the
                                LLC.                      177.840(a)(1).            transportation in commerce
                                                                                of certain Division 2.1
                                                                                gases in cylinders without
                                                                                the pressure relief device
                                                                                (PRD) being in communication
                                                                                with the vapor space.
21378-N......................  Rawhide Leasing Company   ........................  To authorize the
                                LLC.                                                requalification of 3A, 3AA,
                                                                                3AX, 3AAx and 3T cylinders
                                                                                by proof pressure testing in
                                                                                accordance with CGA Pamphlet
                                                                                C-1 in lieu of hydrostatic
                                                                                or direct expansion testing.
21387-N......................  Cobham Mission Systems    173.302a................  To authorize the manufacture,
                                Orchard Park Inc.                                   mark, sale, and use of full
                                                                                wrapped fiber reinforced
                                                                                aluminum 6061-T6 lined
                                                                                cylinder meeting the ISO
                                                                                Standard 11119-2 except as
                                                                                specified herein.
21402-N......................  Daniels Sharpsmart, Inc.  173.196(a)..............  To authorize the
                                                                                transportation in commerce
                                                                                of infectious substances
                                                                                affecting humans in
                                                                                alternative packaging.
21430-N......................  Desert Air Transport,     172.101(j), 173.243,      To authorize the
                                Inc.                      173.27.                   transportation in commerce
                                                                                of certain Class 3 fuels in
                                                                                non-DOT specification bulk
                                                                                packaging aboard cargo-only
                                                                                aircraft.
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
                                         SPECIAL PERMITS DATA--Withdrawn
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

[FR Doc. 2022-22483 Filed 10-14-22; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4909-60-P


[Federal Register Volume 77, Number 182 (Wednesday, September 19, 2012)]
[Proposed Rules]
[Pages 58063-58067]
[FR Doc No: 2012-23152]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY

40 CFR Part 52

[EPA-R06-OAR-2012-0100; FRL-9728-8]

Approval and Promulgation of Implementation Plans; Texas;
Reasonably Available Control Technology for the 1997 8-Hour Ozone
National Ambient Air Quality Standard

AGENCY: Environmental Protection Agency (EPA).

ACTION: Proposed rule.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The EPA is proposing to approve revisions to the Texas State
Implementation Plan (SIP) for the Houston/Galveston/Brazoria (HGB) 1997
8-Hour ozone nonattainment Area (Area). The HGB Area consists of
Brazoria, Chambers, Fort Bend, Galveston, Harris, Liberty, Montgomery
and Waller counties. Specifically, we are proposing to approve portions
of two revisions to the Texas SIP submitted by the Texas Commission on
Environmental Quality (TCEQ) as meeting certain Reasonably Available
Control Technology (RACT) requirements for Volatile Organic Compounds
(VOC) and Oxides of Nitrogen (NOX) in the HGB Area. We are
also proposing to approve the 2007 Voluntary Mobile Emission Reduction
Program (VMEP) commitments for the HGB Area. This action is in
accordance with section 110 of the federal Clean Air Act (the Act,
CAA).

DATES: Comments must be received on or before October 19, 2012.

ADDRESSES: Submit your comments, identified by Docket No. EPA-R06-OAR-
2012-0100, by one of the following methods:
     Federal eRulemaking Portal: http://www.regulations.gov.
Follow the on-line instructions for submitting comments.
     U.S. EPA Region 6 ``Contact Us'' Web site: http://epa.gov/region6/r6coment.htm. Please click on ``6PD'' (Multimedia) and select
``Air'' before submitting comments.
     Email: Mr. Guy Donaldson at<EMAIL_ADDRESS>Please
also send a copy by email to the person listed in the FOR FURTHER
INFORMATION CONTACT section below.
     Fax: Mr. Guy Donaldson, Chief, Air Planning Section (6PD-
L), at fax number<PHONE_NUMBER>.
     Mail: Mr. Guy Donaldson, Chief, Air Planning Section (6PD-
L), Environmental Protection Agency, 1445 Ross Avenue, Suite 1200,
Dallas, Texas 75202-2733.
     Hand or Courier Delivery: Mr. Guy Donaldson, Chief, Air
Planning Section (6PD-L), Environmental Protection Agency, 1445 Ross
Avenue, Suite 1200, Dallas, Texas 75202-2733. Such deliveries are
accepted only between the hours of 8:00 a.m. and 4:00 p.m. weekdays
except for legal holidays. Special arrangements should be made for
deliveries of boxed information.
    Instructions: Direct your comments to Docket ID No. EPA-R06-OAR-
2012-0100. The EPA's policy is that all comments received will be
included in the public docket without change and may be made available
online at www.regulations.gov, including any personal information
provided, unless the comment includes information claimed to be
Confidential Business Information (CBI) or other information the
disclosure of which is restricted by statute. Do not submit information
through www.regulations.gov or email that you consider to be CBI or
otherwise protected from disclosure. The www.regulations.gov Web site
is an ``anonymous access'' system, which means EPA will not know your
identity or contact information unless you provide it in the body of
your comment. If you send an email comment directly to EPA without
going through www.regulations.gov, your email address will be
automatically captured and included as part of the comment that is
placed in the public docket and made available on the Internet. If you
submit an electronic comment, EPA recommends that you include your name
and other contact information in the body of your comment and with any
disk or CD-ROM you submit. If EPA cannot read your comment due to
technical difficulties and cannot contact you for clarification, EPA
may not be able to consider your comment. Electronic files should avoid
the use of special characters, any form of encryption, and be free of
any defects or viruses.
    Docket: All documents in the docket are listed in the
www.regulations.gov index. Although listed in the index, some
information is not publicly available, e.g., CBI or other information
whose disclosure is restricted by statute. Certain other material, such
as copyrighted material, will be publicly available only in hard copy.
Publicly available docket materials are available either electronically
in www.regulations.gov or in hard copy at the Air Planning Section
(6PD-L), Environmental Protection Agency, 1445 Ross Avenue, Suite 700,
Dallas, Texas 75202-2733. The file will be made available by
appointment for public inspection in the Region 6 FOIA Review Room
between the hours of 8:30 a.m. and 4:30 p.m. weekdays except for legal
holidays. Contact the person listed in the FOR FURTHER INFORMATION
CONTACT paragraph below to make an appointment. If possible, please
make the appointment at least two working days in advance of your
visit. There will be a 15 cent per page fee for making photocopies of
documents. On the day of the visit, please check in at the EPA Region 6
reception area at 1445 Ross Avenue, Suite 700, Dallas, Texas 75202-
2733.
    The State submittal is also available for public inspection at the
State Air Agency listed below during official business hours by
appointment: TCEQ, Office of Air Quality, 12124 Park 35 Circle, Austin,
Texas 78753.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Mr. Alan Shar, Air Planning Section
(6PD-L), Environmental Protection Agency, Region 6, 1445 Ross Avenue,
Suite 700, Dallas, Texas 75202-2733, telephone

(214) 665-6691, fax<PHONE_NUMBER>, email address<EMAIL_ADDRESS>
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Throughout this document ``we,'' ``us,'' and
``our'' refer to EPA.

Outline

I. Background
    A. What actions are we proposing?
    1. The June 13, 2007 Submittal
    2. What is a VMEP commitment?
    3. The April 6, 2010 Submittal
    B. What is RACT?
II. Evaluation
    A. What types of VMEP commitments qualify for SIP credit?
    B. What type of programs did Texas submit as VMEP?
    C. Do the 2007 VMEPs meet our requirements for approval?
    D. What action is EPA taking on the 2007 VMEP?
    E. What is TCEQ's approach and analysis to RACT in the June 13,
2007 submittal?
    F. What CTG source categories are we addressing in this action?
    G. Are there any negative declarations associated with the VOC
source categories in the HGB Area?
    H. Why does the revision to 30 TAC Chapter 115 of the June 13,
2007 submittal meet RACT?
    I. Is Texas' approach to major Non-CTG sources for RACT
determination in the HGB Area acceptable?
    J. Is Texas' approach to RACT determination for CTG sources
based on the June 13, 2007 and April 6, 2010 submittals acceptable?
    K. Is Texas' approach to RACT determination for VOC sources
based on the June 13, 2007 and April 6, 2010 submittals acceptable?
    L. Is Texas' approach to for RACT determination for major
NOX sources based on the June 13, 2007 and April 6, 2010
submittals acceptable?
III. Proposed Action
IV. Statutory and Executive Order Reviews

I. Background

A. What actions are we proposing?

    We are proposing to approve portions of revisions to the Texas SIP
submitted to EPA with two separate letters dated June 13, 2007 and
April 6, 2010 from TCEQ. These two separate submittals are described
below.
1. The June 13, 2007 Submittal
    The June 13, 2007 submittal, sent to EPA from TCEQ, included the
following components. (1) Control of Air Pollution from Motor Vehicles,
(2) Control of Air Pollution from Volatile Organic Compounds, and (3)
Voluntary Mobile Emission Reduction Program (VMEP) commitments. Each
component is discussed below. The first component concerns revisions to
30 TAC Chapter 114 Control of Air Pollution from Motor Vehicles,
sections 114.6 and 114.319 which addressed the Texas Low Emission
Diesel standards for marine fuels. We approved this component of the
June 13, 2007 submittal on October 24, 2008, at 73 FR 63378. The
revision to these sections has been in effect, federally, since
November 24, 2008. The second component of the June 13, 2007 submittal
concerns revisions to 30 TAC, Chapter 115 Control of Air Pollution from
Volatile Organic Compounds, sections 115.110, 115.112 -115.117,
115.119, 115.541-115.547 and 115.549. We approved these revisions as
enhancing the Texas SIP because these rule revisions required
additional VOC controls on storage tanks, lowered VOC emissions, and
helped lower ozone levels in the HGB Area. See 75 FR 15348 of March 29,
2010. The revisions to these sections have been in effect, federally,
since May 28, 2010. We are now proposing to approve the 2007 VMEP for
the HGB Area into Texas SIP. For more information on VMEP see section
below. In addition, the June 13, 2007 submittal included an analysis
intended to demonstrate RACT was being implemented in the HGB Area as
required by the CAA (Appendix D of the submittal).
2. What is a VMEP commitment?
    Voluntary mobile source strategies complement existing regulatory
programs through voluntary, non-regulatory changes in local
transportation activities or changes in in-use vehicle and engine
composition. The EPA believes that the Act allows SIP credit for new
approaches to reducing mobile source emissions, where supported by
enforceable commitments to monitor and assess implementation and
backfill any emissions reductions shortfall in a timely fashion. This
flexible approach is consistent with the Clean Air Act section 110.
Economic incentive provisions are also available in sections 182 and
108 of the Act. Credits generated through VMEP can be counted toward
attainment and maintenance of the NAAQS. Due to the innovative nature
of this program, only up to 3% of the total future year emissions
reductions required to attain an appropriate NAAQS, may be claimed
under the VMEP policy guidance.
3. The April 6, 2010 Submittal
    In conjunction with the June 13, 2007 submittal, we are also
proposing to approve a part of the April 6, 2010 revision to the Texas
SIP, submitted with TCEQ's letter of April 6, 2010, for VOC RACT
purposes. Specifically, we are proposing to find, based on the analysis
in Appendix D of the April 6, 2010 submittal that Texas has met certain
RACT requirements under section 182(b). Appendix D of the April 6, 2010
submittal is titled ``Reasonably Available Control Technology
Analysis.'' See section B for more information on RACT evaluation for
the HGB Area.

B. What is RACT?

    The EPA has defined RACT as the lowest emissions limitation that a
particular source is capable of meeting by the application of control
technology that is reasonably available, considering technological and
economic feasibility. See 44 FR 53761, September 17, 1979. Section
172(c)(1) of the Act requires that SIPs for nonattainment areas
``provide for the implementation of all reasonably available control
measures as expeditiously as practicable (including such reductions in
emissions from existing sources in the area as may be obtained through
the adoption, at a minimum, of reasonably available control technology)
and shall provide for attainment of the primary National Ambient Air
Quality (NAAQS) standards.''
    Section 182(b)(2) of the Act requires states to submit a SIP
revision and implement RACT for moderate and above ozone nonattainment
areas. For a Moderate, Serious, or Severe Area a major stationary
source is one which emits, or has the potential to emit, 100, 50, or 25
tons per year (tpy) or more of VOCs or NOX, respectively.
See CAA sections 182(b), 182(c), and 182(d). The EPA provides states
with guidance concerning what types of controls could constitute RACT
for a given source category through the issuance of Control Techniques
Guidelines (CTG) and Alternative Control Techniques (ACT) documents.
See http://www.epa.gov/ttn/naaqs/ozone/ctg_act/index.htm (URL dating
May 23, 2012) for a listing of EPA-issued CTGs and ACTs for VOC or
Oxides of Nitrogen (NOX).
    The HGB Area was designated as Severe for the 1997 8-Hour ozone
NAAQS. See 73 FR 56983, October 1, 2008. Thus, per section 182(d) of
the CAA, a major stationary source in the HGB Area is one which emits,
or has the potential to emit, 25 tpy or more of VOCs or NOX.
The inventory of VOC and NOX sources listed in Appendix D of
the April 6, 2010 submittal is intended to fulfill this requirement.
    Under section 183(b), EPA is required to periodically review and,
as necessary, update CTGs. EPA issued a number of new CTGs in 2006,
2007, and 2008. Accordingly, Texas revised its Chapter 115 regulations
to address these VOC RACT control measures. These most

recent revisions to Chapter 115 regulations corresponding to these
newly-EPA-issued CTGs will be addressed in a separate rulemaking
action.

II. Evaluation

A. What types of VMEP commitments qualify for SIP credit?

    The basic framework for ensuring SIP credit for VMEPs is spelled
out in guidance issued under a memorandum from Richard D. Wilson,
Acting Assistant Administrator for Air and Radiation, dated October 24,
1997, entitled ``Guidance on Incorporating Voluntary Mobile Source
Emission Reduction Programs in State Implementation Plans (SIPs).''
Generally, to obtain credit for a VMEP, a State submits a SIP that: (1)
Identifies and describes a VMEP; (2) Contains projections of emission
reductions attributable to the program, along with any relevant
technical support documentation; (3) Commits to evaluation and
reporting on program implementation and results; and (4) Commits to the
timely remedy of any credit shortfall should the VMEP not achieve the
anticipated emission reductions. More specifically, the guidance
suggests the following key points be considered for approval of
credits. The credits should be quantifiable, surplus, enforceable,
permanent, and adequately supported. In addition, VMEPs must be
consistent with attainment of the standard and with the ROP
requirements and not interfere with other CAA requirements. The VMEP
program for an area can be revised by a SIP revision that substitutes
or adds other VMEP measures if needed.

B. What type of programs did Texas submit as VMEP?

    The State submitted program descriptions that projected emission
reductions attributable to each specific program as part of the HGB
attainment demonstration submitted June 13, 2007. Table 1 below lists
the identified programs and their projected credits.

    Table 1--Voluntary Mobile Emission Reduction Programs and Credits
                                 Claimed
------------------------------------------------------------------------
                                                           NOX benefits
                      Program type                        (tons per day)
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Public and Private Sector Clean Fuel Fleet..............            2.0
Commute Solutions.......................................            0.77
Pooled Ownership of Vehicles............................            0.05
                                                         ---------------
    Total Benefits (tpd)................................            2.82
------------------------------------------------------------------------

This revision to the VMEP builds on the existing HGB VMEP program
approved by EPA on November 14, 2001 which the State previously has
committed to evaluate and report on the program implementation and
results and to timely remedy any credit shortfall.

C. Do the 2007 VMEPs meet our requirements for approval?

    A detailed analysis of all the VMEP measures can be found in our
TSD prepared for this document. For each creditable VMEP, the measure
was found to be quantifiable. The reductions are surplus because they
are not substitutes for mandatory, required emission reductions. The
commitment to monitor, assess and timely remedy any shortfall from
implementation of the measures is enforceable against the State. The
reductions will continue at least for as long as the time period in
which they are used by this SIP demonstration, so they are considered
permanent. There is a commitment that each measure is adequately
supported by personnel and program resources for implementation.

D. What action is EPA taking on the 2007 VMEP?

    The HGB Area's ozone SIP VMEP meets the criteria for credit in the
SIP. Texas has demonstrated that the credits are quantifiable, surplus,
enforceable, permanent, adequately supported, and consistent with the
SIP and the Act. Therefore, we are proposing to approve the 2007 VMEP
portion of the Texas SIP.

E. What is TCEQ's approach and analysis to RACT in the June 13, 2007
submittal?

    Under sections 182(b)(2)(A) and (B) states must insure RACT is in
place for each source category for which EPA issued a CTG. As a part of
June 13, 2007 submittal TCEQ conducted a RACT analysis to demonstrate
that the RACT requirements for CTG sources in the HGB 8-Hour ozone
nonattainment Area have been fulfilled. The TCEQ revised and
supplemented this analysis in the April 6, 2010 submittal. The TCEQ
conducted its analysis by: (1) Identifying all categories of CTG and
major non-CTG sources of VOC and NOX emissions within the
HGB Area; (2) Listing the state regulation that implements or exceeds
RACT requirements for that CTG or non-CTG category; (3) Detailing the
basis for concluding that these regulations fulfill RACT through
comparison with established RACT requirements described in the CTG
guidance documents and rules developed by other state and local
agencies; and (4) Submitting negative declarations when there are no
CTG or major Non-CTG sources of VOC emissions within the HGB Area. We
have reviewed the submittal and are proposing that TCEQ has properly
conducted its analysis, and their approach to control requirements are
in agreement with our RACT requirements for affected VOC sources in the
HGB Area.

F. What CTG source categories are we addressing in this action?

    The EPA entered into a CD with the Sierra Club concerning revisions
to the Texas SIP for HGB Area. Under the terms of this CD, February 1,
2013 is the deadline by which EPA has to propose a rulemaking action
relevant to RACT for VOC and NOX source for the HGB Area.
Table 2 below contains a list of VOC CTG source categories and their
corresponding sections of 30 TAC Chapter 115 that fulfill the
applicable RACT requirements, under the terms of the CD.

  Table 2--CTG Source Categories and Their Corresponding Texas VOC RACT
                                  Rules
------------------------------------------------------------------------
                                            Fulfilling RACT requirement,
        Source category in HGB area              30 TAC chapter 115
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Bulk Gasoline Plants......................  Sec.   115.211-219.
Natural Gas/Gasoline Processing...........  Sec.   115.352-359.
Synthetic Organic Chemical Manufacturing    Sec.   115.352-359.
 Industry--Polymer & Resin Manufacturing.
Gasoline Tank Trucks & Vapor Collection     Sec.   115.211-219 and Sec.
 Systems.                                     115.234-239.
Refineries--Leaks from Equipment..........  Sec.   115.352-359.
Synthetic Organic Chemical Manufacturing    Sec.   115.120-129.
 Industry--High Density Resins.
Synthetic Organic Chemical Manufacturing    Sec.   115.531--539.
 Industry--Synthesized Pharmaceutical
 Products.
Petroleum Liquid Storage--External          Sec.   115.112-119.
 Floating Roof Tanks.

Refineries--Vacuum Producing Systems,       Sec.   115.311-319 and Sec.
 Wastewater Separators, Unit Turnarounds.     115.131-139.
Synthetic Organic Chemical Manufacturing    Sec.   115.120-129.
 Industry--Air Oxidation Processes.
Synthetic Organic Chemical Manufacturing    Sec.   115.120-129.
 Industry--Reactor Processes &
 Distillation Operations.
Shipbuilding and Ship Repair..............  Sec.   115.420-429.
Solvent Metal Cleaning....................  Sec.   115.412-419 and Sec.
                                              115.420-429.
Gasoline Service Stations.................  Sec.   115.221-229.
Petroleum Liquid Storage--Fixed Roof Tanks  Sec.   115.112-119.
Tank Trucks--Gasoline Loading Terminals...  Sec.   115.211-219 or Sec.
                                             115.221-229.
------------------------------------------------------------------------

G. Are there any negative declarations associated with the CTG source
categories in the HGB Area?

    Yes, Texas has declared that there are no existing major sources of
rubber tire manufacturing, identified with the Standard Industrial
Classification (SIC) 3011, in the HGB Area. As such, TCEQ does not have
to adopt VOC regulations relevant to this source category at this time
for the HGB Area. However, if a major source of this category locates
in the HGB Area in future, then TCEQ will need to take appropriate
regulatory measures for SIP purposes.

H. Why does the revision to 30 TAC Chapter 115 of the June 13, 2007
submittal meet RACT?

    As stated elsewhere, we approved revisions to 30 TAC, Chapter 115
Control of Air Pollution from Volatile Organic Compounds on March 29,
2010 at 75 FR 15348. We now have reviewed these revisions to Chapter
115 and have determined that they are in agreement with EPA's Control
Technique Guidelines (CTG) documents titled Control of Volatile Organic
Emissions from Storage of Petroleum Liquids in Fixed-Roof Tanks (EPA-
450/2-77-036, December 1977); Control of Volatile Organic Emissions
from Petroleum Liquid Storage in External Floating Roof Tanks (EPA-450/
2-78-047, December 1978); and Alternative Control Techniques Document--
Volatile Organic Liquid Storage in Floating and Fixed Roof Tanks (EPA-
453/R-94-001, January 1994). Also, see our Technical Support Document
(TSD) prepared in conjunction with this document. Since these revisions
are in agreement with our guideline documents, we are proposing that
they satisfy RACT requirements, and by implementing these measures
Texas is meeting the VOC RACT for liquid storage sources in the HGB
Area.

I. Is Texas' approach to major Non-CTG sources for RACT determination
in the HGB Area acceptable?

    Under section 182(b)(2)(C) states must assure that major sources
not covered by a CTG have RACT in place. Texas has identified a list,
in its Appendix D of the April 6, 2010 submittal, of major VOC sources
in the HGB Area to determine if any do not have RACT level controls in
place and do not fall into the identified sectors for which EPA has
issued a CTG. TCEQ reviewed the point source emissions inventory and
title V databases to identify all major sources of VOC emissions. All
sources in the title V database that were listed as a major source for
VOC emissions were included in the RACT analysis. Since the point
source emissions inventory database reports actual emissions rather
than potential to emit emissions, the TCEQ reviewed sources that
reported actual emissions as low as 10 tpy of VOC to account for the
difference between actual and potential emissions. To be conservative,
sites from the emissions inventory database with emissions of 10 tpy or
more of NOX or VOC that were not identified in the title V
database and could not be verified as minor sources by other means are
also included in the RACT analysis. We have reviewed TCEQ's April 6,
2010 submittal and find their approach to include these sources in the
inventory of the sources acceptable. As documented in Appendix D, Texas
found that each source was covered by existing rules and the
corresponding VOC control measures were in place for the affected
sources. Consistent with our finding under the 1-Hour ozone attainment
demonstration plan for the HGB Area at 70 FR 58136, October 5, 2005,
and 71 FR 52676, September 6, 2006, Texas has met RACT for VOC and
NOX sources, and because Texas' approach in its April 06,
2010 submittal, in identifying major Non-CTG sources, is acceptable and
consistent with our finding and State has certified that it has RACT in
place; we are proposing to approve TCEQ's determination that VOC
control measures in Chapter 115 meet RACT requirements for the major
Non-CTG sources of VOC in the HGB Area under the 1997 8-Hour ozone
NAAQS.

J. Is Texas' approach to RACT determination for CTG source categories
based on the June 13, 2007 and April 6, 2010 submittals acceptable?

    As a part of 1-Hour ozone attainment demonstration plan for the HGB
Area at 70 FR 58136, October 5, 2005; and 71 FR 52676, September 6,
2006, we stated that Texas has met RACT for VOC and NOX
sources. In the TSD developed for this action, we evaluated the
corresponding sections of 30 TAC Chapter 115 for the source categories
identified in Table 2 above in the HGB Area, and have reviewed these
sections against our identified reference documents. In its April 6,
2010, submittal to EPA, TCEQ states that it has reviewed the HGB VOC
rules and certifies that they satisfy RACT requirements for the 8-Hour
ozone standard by the application of control technology that is
reasonably available considering technological and economic
feasibility. We are proposing a determination that Texas VOC rules are
in agreement with the CAA's RACT requirements. Consequently, by
implementing these control requirements (Chapter 115) Texas is
satisfying the RACT requirements for CTG source categories identified
in Table 2 of this document in the HGB Area under the 1997 8-Hour ozone
standard.

K. Is Texas' approach to RACT determination for VOC sources based on
the June 13, 2007 and April 6, 2010 submittals acceptable?

    Yes. The purpose of 30 TAC Chapter 115 rules for the HGB Area is to
establish reasonable controls on the emissions of ozone precursors.
Texas has reviewed its VOC rules and has certified that its rules
satisfy RACT

requirements. As such and based upon the above two sections we are
proposing to find that for both the CTG categories identified in Table
2 and all Non-CTG sources Texas has RACT-level controls in place for
the HGB Area under the 1997 8-Hour ozone standard.

L. Is Texas' approach to for RACT determination for major NOX sources
based on the June 13, 2007 and April 6, 2010 submittals acceptable?

    Texas has identified a list of major NOX sources in the
HGB Area, in its Appendix D of the April 6, 2010 submittal. TCEQ
reviewed the point source emissions inventory and title V databases to
identify all major sources of NOX emissions. All sources in
the title V database that were listed as a major source for
NOX emissions were included in the RACT analysis. Since the
point source emissions inventory database reports actual emissions
rather than potential to emit emissions, the TCEQ reviewed sources that
reported actual emissions as low as 10 tpy of NOX to account
for the difference between actual and potential emissions. To be
conservative, sites from the emissions inventory database with
emissions of 10 tpy or more of NOX that were not identified
in the title V database and could not be verified as minor sources by
other means are also included in the RACT analysis. We have reviewed
TCEQ's April 6, 2010 submittal and find their approach to include these
sources in the inventory of the sources acceptable.
    Texas reviewed the list of sources and certified that it has the
appropriate NOX control measures in place for the affected
sources. In addition, as a part of 1-Hour ozone attainment
demonstration plan for the HGB Area at 70 FR 58136, October 5, 2005,
and 71 FR 52676, September 6, 2006, Texas has met RACT for VOC and
NOX sources. We are proposing to approve TCEQ's
determination that NOX control measures in Chapter 117 meet
RACT requirements for major sources of NOX in the HGB Area
under the 1997 8-Hour ozone NAAQS.

III. Proposed Action

    Today, we are proposing to find that for VOC, CTG categories
identified in Table 2 and major Non-CTG sources, and for
NOX, Texas has RACT-level controls in place for the HGB Area
under the 1997 8-Hour ozone standard. The EPA had previously approved
RACT for VOC and NOX into Texas' SIP under the 1-Hour ozone
standard. We are also proposing to approve the 2007 VMEP into Texas
SIP.

IV. Statutory and Executive Order Reviews

    Under the Clean Air Act, the Administrator is required to approve a
SIP submission that complies with the provisions of the Act and
applicable Federal regulations. If a portion of the plan revision meets
all the applicable requirements of this chapter and Federal
regulations, the Administrator may approve the plan revision in part.
42 U.S.C. 7410(k); 40 CFR 52.02(a). Thus, in reviewing SIP submissions,
EPA's role is to approve state choices that meet the criteria of the
Act, and to disapprove state choices that do not meet the criteria of
the Act. Accordingly, this proposed action approves state law as
meeting Federal requirements and does not impose additional
requirements beyond those imposed by state law. For that reason, this
proposed action:
     Is not a ``significant regulatory action'' subject to
review by the Office of Management and Budget under Executive Order
12866 (58 FR 51735, October 4, 1993);
     Does not impose an information collection burden under the
provisions of the Paperwork Reduction Act (44 U.S.C. 3501 et seq.);
     Is certified as not having a significant economic impact
on a substantial number of small entities under the Regulatory
Flexibility Act (5 U.S.C. 601 et seq.);
     Does not contain any unfunded mandate or significantly or
uniquely affect small governments, as described in the Unfunded
Mandates Reform Act of 1995 (Pub. L. 104-4);
     Does not have Federalism implications as specified in
Executive Order 13132 (64 FR 43255, August 10, 1999);
     Is not an economically significant regulatory action based
on health or safety risks subject to Executive Order 13045 (62 FR
19885, April 23, 1997);
     Is not a significant regulatory action subject to
Executive Order 13211 (66 FR 28355, May 22, 2001);
     Is not subject to requirements of section 12(d) of the
National Technology Transfer and Advancement Act of 1995 (15 U.S.C. 272
note) because application of those requirements would be inconsistent
with the Clean Air Act;
     Does not provide EPA with the discretionary authority to
address, as appropriate, disproportionate human health or environmental
effects, using practicable and legally permissible methods, under
Executive Order 12898 (59 FR 7629, February 16, 1994); and
     This rule does not have tribal implications as specified
by Executive Order 13175 (65 FR 67249, November 9, 2000), because the
SIP is not approved to apply in Indian country located in the state,
and EPA notes that it will not impose substantial direct costs on
tribal governments or preempt tribal law.

    Authority:  42 U.S.C. 7401 et seq.

List of Subjects in 40 CFR Part 52

    Environmental protection, Air pollution control, Hydrocarbons,
Incorporation by reference, Intergovernmental relations, Reporting and
recordkeeping requirements, Volatile organic compounds.

    Dated: September 6, 2012.
Lynda F. Carroll,
Acting Regional Administrator, Region 6.
[FR Doc. 2012-23152 Filed 9-18-12; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6560-50-P