[Federal Register Volume 86, Number 222 (Monday, November 22, 2021)]
[Notices]
[Pages 66294-66295]
[FR Doc No: 2021-25404]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission

[Project No. 14634-003]

New England Hydropower Company, LLC; Notice of Application
Tendered for Filing With the Commission and Soliciting Additional Study
Requests and Establishing Procedural Schedule for Relicensing and a
Deadline for Submission of Final Amendments

    Take notice that the following hydroelectric application has been
filed with the Commission and is available for public inspection.
    a. Type of Application: Minor License.
    b. Project No.: 14634-003.
    c. Date filed: November 2, 2021.
    d. Applicant: New England Hydropower Company, LLC (NEHC).
    e. Name of Project: Ashton Dam Hydroelectric Project (project).
    f. Location: On the Blackstone River in Providence County, Rhode
Island. No federal or tribal lands would be occupied by project works
or located within the project boundary.
    g. Filed Pursuant to: Federal Power Act 16 U.S.C. 791(a)-825(r).
    h. Applicant Contact: Mr. Michael Kerr, New England Hydropower
Company, LLC, 100 Cummings Center, Suite 451C, Beverly, MA 01915; Phone
at<PHONE_NUMBER>, or email at [email protected].
    i. FERC Contact: John Baummer at<PHONE_NUMBER>, or
[email protected].
    j. Cooperating agencies: Federal, state, local, and tribal agencies
with jurisdiction and/or special expertise with respect to
environmental issues that wish to cooperate in the preparation of the
environmental document should follow the instructions for filing such
requests described in item l below. Cooperating agencies should note
the Commission's policy that agencies that cooperate in the preparation
of the environmental document cannot also intervene. See 94 FERC ]
61,076 (2001).
    k. Pursuant to section 4.32(b)(7) of 18 CFR of the Commission's
regulations, if any resource agency, Indian Tribe, or person believes
that an additional scientific study should be conducted in order to
form an adequate factual basis

for a complete analysis of the application on its merit, the resource
agency, Indian Tribe, or person must file a request for a study with
the Commission not later than 60 days from the date of filing of the
application, and serve a copy of the request on the applicant.
    l. Deadline for filing additional study requests and requests for
cooperating agency status: January 1, 2022.
    The Commission strongly encourages electronic filing. Please file
additional study requests and requests for cooperating agency status
using the Commission's eFiling system at https://ferconline.ferc.gov/FERCOnline.aspx. For assistance, please contact FERC Online Support at
[email protected],<PHONE_NUMBER> (toll free), or (202) 502-
8659 (TTY). In lieu of electronic filing, you may submit a paper copy.
Submissions sent via the U.S. Postal Service must be addressed to:
Kimberly D. Bose, Secretary, Federal Energy Regulatory Commission, 888
First Street NE, Room 1A, Washington, DC 20426. Submissions sent via
any other carrier must be addressed to: Kimberly D. Bose, Secretary,
Federal Energy Regulatory Commission, 12225 Wilkins Avenue, Rockville,
MD 20852. All filings must clearly identify the project name and docket
number on the first page: Ashton Dam Hydroelectric Project (P-14634-
003).
    m. The application is not ready for environmental analysis at this
time.
    n. The proposed Ashton Dam Hydroelectric Project would consist of:
(1) An existing stone masonry gravity dam that includes: (a) A western
abutment section; (b) a 203-foot-long western spillway section with a
crest elevation of 73.6 feet North American Vertical Datum of 1988
(NAVD 88); (c) an 18-foot-long stone masonry pier that includes two 4-
foot-wide, 8-foot-high existing openings, to be modified to include a
new low-level steel bulkhead panel; (d) an existing 54-foot-long
eastern spillway section that would be replaced with a new 54-foot-long
concrete section that includes: (i) Two 19.7-foot-wide, 18.1-foot-high
log sluice gates with crest elevations of 82.1 NAVD 88; (ii) two 19.7-
foot-wide, horizontal steel trashracks sloped at 9 degrees to inflow
with 0.5-inch clear bar spacing; and (iii) two 19.7-foot-wide, 15.4-
foot-high openings; and (e) an eastern abutment section; (2) an
existing impoundment with a surface area of 11.73 acres at an elevation
of 73.6 feet NAVD 88; (3) four submersible StreamDiver Kaplan turbine-
generator units (three 189-kilowatt (kW) and one 102-kW generators)
located in the openings of the new concrete structure, with a total
installed capacity of 669 kW; (4) four new 8.1-foot-wide, 3.8-foot-high
hinged crest gates with crest elevations of 73.6 feet NAVD 88,
installed on top of the new concrete structure; (5) a new 11.5-foot-
long, 44.3-foot-wide concrete tailrace and an approximately 30- to 45-
foot-long, 44.3-foot-wide concrete apron; (6) a new 20-foot-long, 8-
foot-wide control building located on the eastern shoreline of the
Blackstone River; (7) a new step-up transformer and a 1,370-foot-long
underground transmission line connecting the project to the
distribution system owned by the Narragansett Electric Company; (8) a
new access road and parking area; and (9) appurtenant facilities.
    NEHC proposes to: (1) Operate the project in a run-of-river mode
with an estimated annual energy production of approximately 2,870
megawatt-hours; (2) release a continuous minimum flow of 100 cubic feet
per second or inflow whichever is less, over the western spillway; (3)
install a downstream fish passage facility between the crest gates on
top of the new concrete structure; and (4) install an upstream eel
passage facility at the project dam.
    o. In addition to publishing the full text of this notice in the
Federal Register, the Commission provides all interested persons an
opportunity to view and/or print the contents of this notice, as well
as other documents in the proceeding (e.g., license application) via
the internet through the Commission's Home Page (http://www.ferc.gov)
using the ``eLibrary'' link. Enter the docket number excluding the last
three digits in the docket number field to access the document (P-
14634). For assistance, contact FERC at [email protected] or
call toll-free,<PHONE_NUMBER> or<PHONE_NUMBER> (TTY).
    You may also register online at https://ferconline.ferc.gov/FERCOnline.aspx to be notified via email of new filings and issuances
related to this or other pending projects. For assistance, contact FERC
Online Support.
    p. Procedural schedule: The application will be processed according
to the following preliminary schedule. Revisions to the schedule will
be made as appropriate.

Issue Deficiency Letter (if necessary)--January 2022
Request Additional Information--January 2022
Issue Scoping Document 1 for comments--March 2022
Request Additional Information (if necessary)--April 2022
Issue Acceptance Letter--April 2022
Issue Scoping Document 2--June 2022
Issue Notice of Ready for Environmental Analysis--June 2022

    q. Final amendments to the application must be filed with the
Commission no later than 30 days from the issuance date of the notice
of ready for environmental analysis.

    Dated: November 16, 2021.
Debbie-Anne A. Reese,
Deputy Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2021-25404 Filed 11-19-21; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6717-01-P


[Federal Register Volume 88, Number 190 (Tuesday, October 3, 2023)]
[Notices]
[Page 68211]
[FR Doc No: 2023-21784]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

[Release No. 34-98559; File No. SR-OCC-2023-003]

Self-Regulatory Organizations; Options Clearing Corporation;
Notice of Designation of Longer Period for Commission Action on
Proceedings To Determine Whether To Approve or Disapprove a Proposed
Rule Change, as Modified by Partial Amendment No. 1, Concerning
Clearing Member Cybersecurity Obligations

September 27, 2023.
    On March 21, 2023, the Options Clearing Corporation (``OCC'') filed
with the Securities and Exchange Commission (``Commission'') the
proposed rule change SR-OCC-2023-003 pursuant to Section 19(b) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (``Exchange Act'') \1\ and Rule 19b-4
\2\ thereunder to amend certain provisions in OCC's Rules relating to
each Clearing Member's obligation to address a ''Security Incident''
(i.e., the occurrence of a cyber-related disruption or intrusion) of
that Clearing Member.\3\ The proposed rule change was published for
public comment in the Federal Register on April 5, 2023.\4\ The
Commission has received comments regarding the proposed rule change.\5\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \1\ 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(1).
    \2\ 17 CFR 240.19b-4.
    \3\ See Notice of Filing infra note 4, at 88 FR at 20195.
    \4\ Securities Exchange Act Release No. 97225 (Mar. 30, 2023),
88 FR 20195 (Apr. 5, 2023) (File No. SR-OCC-2023-003) (``Notice of
Filing'').
    \5\ Comments on the proposed rule change are available at
https://www.sec.gov/comments/sr-occ-2023-003/srocc2023003.htm.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    On May 18, 2023, pursuant to Section 19(b)(2) of the Exchange
Act,\6\ the Commission designated a longer period within which to
approve, disapprove, or institute proceedings to determine whether to
approve or disapprove the proposed rule change.\7\ On May 24, 2023, OCC
filed Partial Amendment No. 1 to the proposed rule change.\8\ On July
3, 2023, the Commission instituted proceedings, pursuant to Section
19(b)(2)(B) of the Exchange Act,\9\ to determine whether to approve or
disapprove the Proposed Rule Change, as modified by Partial Amendment
No. 1 (hereinafter defined as ``Proposed Rule Change'').\10\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \6\ 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(2).
    \7\ Securities Exchange Act Release No. 97525 (May 18, 2023), 88
FR 33655 (May 24, 2023) (File No. SR-OCC-2023-003).
    \8\ Securities Exchange Act Release No. 97602 (May 26, 2023), 88
FR 36351 (Jun. 2, 2023) (File No. SR-OCC-2023-003) (``Partial
Amendment No. 1'').
    \9\ 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(2)(B).
    \10\ Securities Exchange Act Release No. 97832 (July 3, 2023),
88 FR 43640 (July 10, 2023) (File No. SR-OCC-2023-003).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    Section 19(b)(2) of the Exchange Act \11\ provides that proceedings
to determine whether to approve or disapprove a proposed rule change
must be concluded within 180 days of the date of publication of notice
of filing of the proposed rule change. The time for conclusion of the
proceedings may be extended for up to 60 days if the Commission
determines that a longer period is appropriate and publishes the
reasons for such determination.\12\ The 180th day after publication of
the Notice in the Federal Register is October 2, 2023.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \11\ 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(2).
    \12\ 15 U.S.C 78s(b)(2)(B)(ii)(II).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    The Commission is extending the period for Commission action on the
Proposed Rule Change. The Commission finds that it is appropriate to
designate a longer period within which to take action on the Proposed
Rule Change so that the Commission has sufficient time to consider the
issues raised by the Proposed Rule Change and to take action on the
Proposed Rule Change. Accordingly, pursuant to Section
19(b)(2)(B)(ii)(II) of the Exchange Act,\13\ the Commission designates
December 1, 2023, as the date by which the Commission should either
approve or disapprove the Proposed Rule Change SR-OCC-2023-003.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \13\ Id.

    For the Commission, by the Division of Trading and Markets,
pursuant to delegated authority.\14\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \14\ 17 CFR 200.30-3(a)(57).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

Sherry R. Haywood,
Assistant Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2023-21784 Filed 10-2-23; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 8011-01-P


[Federal Register Volume 81, Number 108 (Monday, June 6, 2016)]
[Notices]
[Pages 36377-36378]
[FR Doc No: 2016-13183]

=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION

Federal Aviation Administration

Notice of Request To Release Airport Property

AGENCY: Federal Aviation Administration (FAA), DOT.

ACTION: Notice of intent to rule on request to release airport property
at the Ankeny Regional Airport, Ankeny, Iowa.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The FAA proposes to rule and invites public comment on the
release of land at the Ankeny Regional Airport, Ankeny, Iowa, under the
provisions of 49 U.S.C. 47107(h)(2).

DATES: Comments must be received on or before July 6, 2016.

ADDRESSES: Comments on this application may be mailed or delivered to
the FAA at the following address: Lynn D. Martin, Airports Compliance
Specialist, Federal Aviation Administration, Airports Division, ACE-
610C, 901 Locust Room 364, Kansas City, MO 64106.
    In addition, one copy of any comments submitted to the FAA must be
mailed or delivered to: Polk County Aviation Authority, Jeff Wangsness,
President, C/O Brick Gentry P.C. 6701 Westown Parkway Suite 100, West
Des Moines, IA 50266,<PHONE_NUMBER>.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Lynn D. Martin, Airports Compliance
Specialist, Federal Aviation Administration, Airports Division, ACE-
610C, 901 Locust Room 364, Kansas City, MO 64106,<PHONE_NUMBER>,
<EMAIL_ADDRESS>    The request to release property may be reviewed, by appointment, in
person at this same location.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The FAA invites public comment on the
request to release approximately 10.42 acres of airport property at the
Ankeny Regional Airport (IKV) under the provisions of 49 U.S.C.
47107(h)(2). On March 16, 2016, the Airport Authority at the Ankeny
Regional Airport requested from the FAA that approximately 10.42 acres
of property be released for sale to Mr. and Mrs. Darryl Bresson for use
as an agriculture operation with future business prospects. On March
16, 2016, the FAA determined that the request to

release property at the Ankeny Regional Airport (IKV) submitted by the
Sponsor meets the procedural requirements of the Federal Aviation
Administration and the release of the property does not and will not
impact future aviation needs at the airport. The FAA may approve the
request, in whole or in part, no sooner than thirty days after the
publication of this Notice.
    The following is a brief overview of the request:
    Ankeny Regional Airport (IKV) is proposing the release of one
parcel, of 10.42 acres, more or less. The release of land is necessary
to comply with Federal Aviation Administration Grant Assurances that do
not allow federally acquired airport property to be used for non-
aviation purposes. The sale of the subject property will result in the
land at the Ankeny Regional Airport (IKV) being changed from
aeronautical to non-aeronautical use and release the lands from the
conditions of the Airport Improvement Program Grant Agreement Grant
Assurances. In accordance with 49 U.S.C. 47107(c)(2)(B)(i) and (iii),
the airport will receive fair market value for the property, which will
be subsequently reinvested in another eligible airport improvement
project for general aviation facilities at the Ankeny Regional Airport.
    Any person may inspect, by appointment, the request in person at
the FAA office listed above under FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT. In
addition, any person may, upon appointment and request, inspect the
application, notice and other documents determined by the FAA to be
related to the application in person at the Ankeny Regional Airport.

    Issued in Kansas City, MO on May 24, 2016.
Jim A. Johnson,
Manager, Airports Division.
[FR Doc. 2016-13183 Filed 6-3-16; 8:45 am]
 BILLING CODE 4910-13-P


[Federal Register Volume 77, Number 218 (Friday, November 9, 2012)]
[Notices]
[Pages 67417-67418]
[FR Doc No: 2012-27363]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

[Release No. 34-68157; File No. SR-NYSEARCA-2012-119]

Self-Regulatory Organizations; NYSE Arca, Inc.; Notice of Filing
and Immediate Effectiveness of a Proposed Rule Change To Amend the NYSE
Arca Options Fee Schedule To Remove Dividend Spreads From the List of
Strategy Executions for Which Fee Caps Apply

November 5, 2012.
    Pursuant to Section 19(b)(1) \1\ of the Securities Exchange Act of
1934 (the ``Act''),\2\ and Rule 19b-4 thereunder,\3\ notice is hereby
given that on October 23, 2012, NYSE Arca, Inc. (the ``Exchange'' or
``NYSE Arca'') filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the
``Commission'') the proposed rule change as described in Items I, II,
and III below, which Items have been prepared by the self-regulatory
organization. The Commission is publishing this notice to solicit
comments on the proposed rule change from interested persons.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \1\ 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(1).
    \2\ 15 U.S.C. 78a.
    \3\ 17 CFR 240.19b-4.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

I. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement of the Terms of Substance
of the Proposed Rule Change

    The Exchange proposes to amend the NYSE Arca Options Fee Schedule
(``Fee Schedule'') to remove dividend spreads from the list of strategy
executions for which fee caps apply. The text of the proposed rule
change is available on the Exchange's Web site at www.nyse.com, at the
principal office of the Exchange, and at the Commission's Public
Reference Room.

II. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement of the Purpose of, and
Statutory Basis for, the Proposed Rule Change

    In its filing with the Commission, the self-regulatory organization
included statements concerning the purpose of and basis for the
proposed rule change and discussed any comments it received on the
proposed rule change. The text of those statements may be examined at
the places specified in Item IV below. The Exchange has prepared
summaries, set forth in sections A, B, and C below, of the most
significant parts of such statements.

A. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement of the Purpose of, and the
Statutory Basis for, the Proposed Rule Change

1. Purpose
    The Exchange proposes to amend its Fee Schedule to remove dividend
spreads from the list of strategy executions for which fee caps apply.
The proposed fee change will be operative on November 1, 2012.
    Under the Exchange's current Fee Schedule, there is a $750 cap on
transaction fees for strategy executions involving (a) reversals and
conversions,\4\ (b) dividend spreads,\5\ (c) box spreads,\6\ (d) short
stock interest spreads,\7\ (e) merger spreads,\8\ and (f) jelly rolls
\9\ (``Strategy Executions''). The cap applies to each Strategy
Execution executed on the same trading day in the same option class.
Transaction fees for Strategy Executions are further capped at $25,000
per month per initiating firm. Manual Broker Dealer and Firm
Proprietary Strategy trades that do not reach the $750 cap are billed
at $0.25 per contract.\10\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \4\ A ``reversal'' is established by combining a short security
position with a short put and a long call position that shares the
same strike and expiration. A ``conversion'' is established by
combining a long position in the underlying security with a long put
and a short call position that shares the same strike and
expiration.
    \5\ A ``dividend spread'' is defined as transactions done to
achieve a dividend arbitrage involving the purchase, sale and
exercise of in-the-money options of the same class, executed prior
to the date on which the underlying stock goes ex-dividend.
    \6\ A ``box spread'' is defined as transactions involving a long
call option and a short put option at one strike, combined with a
short call option and long put at a different strike, to create
synthetic long and synthetic short stock positions, respectively.
    \7\ A ``short stock interest spread'' is defined as transactions
done to achieve a short stock interest arbitrage involving the
purchase, sale and exercise of in-the-money options of the same
class.
    \8\ A ``merger spread'' is defined as transactions done to
achieve a merger arbitrage involving the purchase, sale and exercise
of options of the same class and expiration date, each executed
prior to the date on which shareholders of record are required to
elect their respective form of consideration, i.e., cash or stock.
    \9\ A ``jelly roll'' is created by entering into two separate
positions simultaneously. One position involves buying a put and
selling a call with the same strike price and expiration. The second
position involves selling a put and buying a call, with the same
strike price, but with a different expiration from the first
position.
    \10\ All Royalty fees associated with Strategy Executions on
Index and Exchange Traded Funds are passed through to trading
participants on the Strategy Executions on a pro-rata basis. These
Royalty fees are not included in the calculation of the $750 per
trade cap or the $25,000 per month strategy fee cap. FLEX Option
trades also are not eligible for strategy treatment.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    The Exchange proposes to remove dividend spreads from the list of
Strategy Executions that are subject to the fee caps. The fee caps may
provide an incentive to engage in the Strategy Executions. The Exchange
has determined that it does not wish to continue to provide an
incentive via its Fee Schedule to engage in dividend spread trading
because this strategy may encourage high volumes of trading of certain
securities near the ex-dividend date and present operational risks to
market participants with respect to clearing, exercise, and assignment
or other issues that may prevent the market participant from the timely
exercise of call options and collecting the dividend owed. As such, the
Exchange proposes to remove dividend spreads from the Strategy
Executions fee caps.
    The Exchange also proposes to specify that, as a result of removing
dividend spreads from the list of Strategy Executions that are subject
to the fee caps, the type of execution that the Exchange currently
considers to be a dividend spread \11\ would no longer be excluded from
the $75,000 cap per month on Firm Proprietary fees and Broker Dealer
fees for transactions cleared in the customer range for manual (open
outcry) executions.\12\ Currently, all Strategy Executions are excluded
from this cap, including dividend spreads. However, because dividend
spreads would no longer be considered a Strategy Execution for purposes
of billing on the Exchange, the cap would no longer exclude such
executions. However, the Exchange does not anticipate that this would
result in a significant amount of such executions occurring on the
Exchange. In this regard, the Exchange believes that the elimination of
the $750 fee cap would eliminate the incentive for market participants
to effect such executions on the Exchange.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \11\ See supra note 5.
    \12\ This resulting change would not require a corresponding
change in the Fee Schedule and, accordingly, there is not a change
proposed in this respect in the Exhibit 5 attached hereto. In this
regard, while Strategy Executions are referenced with respect to the
$75,000 fee cap, the different types of Strategy Executions are not
specifically identified, as is done for the $750 fee cap.
Nonetheless, the Exchange believes that describing the resulting
treatment will specify the impact regarding the $75,000 fee cap.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    The proposed change is not otherwise intended to address any other
matter, and the Exchange is not aware of any significant problem that
the affected market participants would have in complying with the
proposed change.
2. Statutory Basis
    The Exchange believes that the proposed rule change is consistent
with Section 6(b) of the Securities Exchange

Act of 1934 (the ``Act''),\13\ in general, and furthers the objectives
of Section 6(b)(4) of the Act,\14\ in particular, because it provides
for the equitable allocation of reasonable dues, fees, and other
charges among its members, issuers and other persons using its
facilities and does not unfairly discriminate between customers,
issuers, brokers, or dealers.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \13\ 15 U.S.C. 78f(b).
    \14\ 15 U.S.C. 78f(b)(4).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    The Exchange believes that the proposed change is reasonable
because the fee caps may provide an incentive to engage in dividend
spreads and the Exchange has determined that it no longer wishes to
offer any potential incentive via its Fee Schedule in light of the
operational risks that dividend spreads may present. The Exchange also
believes that the proposed change is equitable and not unfairly
discriminatory because it would apply equally to all market
participants and because the remaining Strategy Executions that would
continue to be subject to the fee caps do not present the same type of
potential operational risks.
    Furthermore, it is reasonable to specify that the type of execution
that the Exchange currently considers to be a dividend spread \15\
would no longer be excluded from the $75,000 cap per month on Firm
Proprietary fees and Broker Dealer fees for transactions cleared in the
customer range for manual (open outcry) executions. Specifically,
because dividend spreads would no longer be considered a Strategy
Execution for purposes of billing on the Exchange, the $75,000 fee cap
would no longer exclude such executions. However, the Exchange does not
anticipate that this would result in a significant amount of such
executions occurring on the Exchange. In this regard, the Exchange
believes that the elimination of the $750 fee cap would eliminate the
incentive for market participants to effect such executions on the
Exchange. This would also be equitable and not unfairly discriminatory
because it would not differentiate between any particular market
participants when determining whether the $75,000 fee cap has been
reached with respect to the inclusion of the type of execution that the
Exchange currently considers to be a dividend spread.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \15\ See supra note 5.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    The Exchange notes that it operates in a highly competitive market
in which market participants can readily favor competing venues. In
such an environment, the Exchange must continually review, and consider
adjusting, its fees and credits to remain competitive with other
exchanges. For the reasons described above, the Exchange believes that
the proposed rule change reflects this competitive environment.

B. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement on Burden on Competition

    The Exchange does not believe that the proposed rule change will
impose any burden on competition that is not necessary or appropriate
in furtherance of the purposes of the Act.

C. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement on Comments on the Proposed
Rule Change Received From Members, Participants, or Others

    No written comments were solicited or received with respect to the
proposed rule change.

III. Date of Effectiveness of the Proposed Rule Change and Timing for
Commission Action

    The foregoing rule change is effective upon filing pursuant to
Section 19(b)(3)(A) \16\ of the Act and subparagraph (f)(2) of Rule
19b-4 \17\ thereunder, because it establishes a due, fee, or other
charge imposed by NYSE Arca.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \16\ 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(3)(A).
    \17\ 17 CFR 240.19b-4(f)(2).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    At any time within 60 days of the filing of such proposed rule
change, the Commission summarily may temporarily suspend such rule
change if it appears to the Commission that such action is necessary or
appropriate in the public interest, for the protection of investors, or
otherwise in furtherance of the purposes of the Act.

IV. Solicitation of Comments

    Interested persons are invited to submit written data, views, and
arguments concerning the foregoing, including whether the proposed rule
change is consistent with the Act. Comments may be submitted by any of
the following methods:

Electronic Comments

     Use the Commission's Internet comment form (http://www.sec.gov/rules/sro.shtml); or
     Send an email to<EMAIL_ADDRESS>Please include
File Number SR-NYSEARCA-2012-119 on the subject line.

Paper Comments

     Send paper comments in triplicate to Elizabeth M. Murphy,
Secretary, Securities and Exchange Commission, 100 F Street NE.,
Washington, DC 20549-1090.

All submissions should refer to File Number SR-NYSEARCA-2012-119. This
file number should be included on the subject line if email is used. To
help the Commission process and review your comments more efficiently,
please use only one method. The Commission will post all comments on
the Commission's Internet Web site (http://www.sec.gov/rules/sro.shtml). Copies of the submission, all subsequent amendments, all
written statements with respect to the proposed rule change that are
filed with the Commission, and all written communications relating to
the proposed rule change between the Commission and any person, other
than those that may be withheld from the public in accordance with the
provisions of 5 U.S.C. 552, will be available for Web site viewing and
printing in the Commission's Public Reference Room, 100 F Street NE.,
Washington, DC 20549-1090, on official business days between the hours
of 10:00 a.m. and 3:00 p.m. Copies of the filing will also be available
for inspection and copying at the NYSE's principal office and on its
Internet Web site at www.nyse.com. All comments received will be posted
without change; the Commission does not edit personal identifying
information from submissions. You should submit only information that
you wish to make available publicly. All submissions should refer to
File Number SR-NYSEARCA-2012-119 and should be submitted on or before
November 30, 2012.

    For the Commission, by the Division of Trading and Markets,
pursuant to delegated authority.\18\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \18\ 17 CFR 200.30-3(a)(12).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

Kevin M. O'Neill,
Deputy Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2012-27363 Filed 11-8-12; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 8011-01-P


[Federal Register Volume 76, Number 239 (Tuesday, December 13, 2011)]
[Proposed Rules]
[Pages 77453-77454]
[FR Doc No: 2011-31976]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION

Federal Aviation Administration

14 CFR Part 183

[Docket No. FAA-2011-1149]

Clarification of Policy Regarding Designated Aircraft Dispatcher
Examiners; Reopening of Comment Period

AGENCY: Federal Aviation Administration (FAA), Department of
Transportation (DOT).

ACTION: Notice of availablity; reopening of comment period.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: This action reopens the comment period for guidance material
that was published for comment in the Federal Register on November 8,
2011. In that document, the FAA clarifies guidance to employees on the
responsibilities, qualifications, and oversight of designated aircraft
dispatcher examiners. The comment period closed on December 8, 2011.
This reopening is a result of a request for extension of the comment
period.

DATES: The comment period for the guidance material closed on December
8, 2011. The comment period is reopened and extended until February 8,
2012.

ADDRESSES: You may send comments identified by docket number FAA-2011-
1149 using any of the following methods:
     Federal eRulemaking Portal: Go to http://www.regulations.gov and follow the online instructions for sending your
comments electronically.
     Mail: Send comments to Docket Operations, M-30; U.S.
Department of Transportation (DOT), 1200 New Jersey Avenue SE., Room
W12-140, West Building Ground Floor, Washington, DC 20590-0001.
     Hand Delivery or Courier: Take comments to Docket
Operations in Room W12-140 of the West Building Ground Floor at 1200
New Jersey Avenue SE., Washington, DC, between 9 a.m. and 5 p.m.,
Monday through Friday, except Federal holidays.
     Fax: Fax comments to Docket Operations at<PHONE_NUMBER>.
    Privacy: The FAA will post all comments it receives, without
change, to http://www.regulations.gov, including

any personal information the commenter provides. Using the search
function of the docket web site, anyone can find and read the
electronic form of all comments received into any FAA docket, including
the name of the individual sending the comment (or signing the comment
for an association, business, labor union, etc.). DOT's complete
Privacy Act Statement can be found in the Federal Register published on
April 11, 2000 (65 FR 19477-19478), as well as at http://DocketsInfo.dot.gov.
    Docket: Background documents or comments received may be read at
http://www.regulations.gov at any time. Follow the online instructions
for accessing the docket or Docket Operations in Room W12-140 of the
West Building Ground Floor at 1200 New Jersey Avenue SE., Washington,
DC, between 9 a.m. and 5 p.m., Monday through Friday, except Federal
holidays.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Theodora Kessaris, Technical Programs
Branch, Air Transportation Division (AFS-200), Flight Standards
Service, Federal Aviation Administration, 800 Independence Avenue SW.,
Washington, DC 20591; telephone<PHONE_NUMBER>; facsimile: (202) 267-
5229; email<EMAIL_ADDRESS>
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: See the ``Additional Information'' section
for information on how to comment on this proposal and how the FAA will
handle comments received. The ``Additional Information'' section also
contains related information about the docket, privacy, the handling of
proprietary or confidential business information. In addition, there is
information on obtaining copies of related rulemaking documents.

Background

    On November 8, 2011, the FAA published Clarification of Policy
Regarding Designated Aircraft Dispatcher Examiners (76 FR 69171,
69172). The comment period closed on December 8, 2011.
    In a letter dated November 18, 2011, Sheffield School of
Aeronautics requested a five month extension of the comment period to
allow the part 65 dispatcher certification course operators, which
often are small businesses with limited resources, sufficient time to
review and comment on the guidance material. While the FAA concurs with
the petitioners' requests for an extension of the comment period, it
does not support a five month extension as requested by the petitioner.
The FAA finds that providing an additional 60 days is sufficient to
provide meaningful comment.
    The FAA does not anticipate any further extension of the comment
period for this guidance material.

Extension of Comment Period

    In accordance with 14 CFR 11.47(c), the FAA has reviewed the
request for extension of the comment period to the proposed guidance
material. The petitioner has shown a substantive interest in the
guidance material and good cause for the extension. The FAA has
determined that extension of the comment period is consistent with the
public interest, and that good cause exists for taking this action.
    Accordingly, the comment period is reopened and extended until
February 8, 2012.

Additional Information

A. Comments Invited

    The FAA invites interested persons to participate in the
development of this guidance material by submitting written comments,
data, or views. The most helpful comments reference a specific portion
of the guidance, explain the reason for any recommended change, and
include supporting data. To ensure the docket does not contain
duplicate comments, commenters should send only one copy of written
comments, or if comments are filed electronically, commenters should
submit only one time.
    The FAA will file in the docket all comments it receives. The FAA
will consider all comments it receives on or before the closing date
for comments. The FAA will consider comments filed after the comment
period has closed if it is possible to do so without incurring expense
or delay. The agency may change this guidance material in light of the
comments it receives.
    Proprietary or Confidential Business Information: Do not file
proprietary or confidential business information in the docket. Such
information must be sent or delivered directly to the person identified
in the FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT section of this document, and
marked as proprietary or confidential. If submitting information on a
disk or CD ROM, mark the outside of the disk or CD ROM, and identify
electronically within the disk or CD ROM the specific information that
is proprietary or confidential.
    Under 14 CFR 11.35(b), if the FAA is aware of proprietary
information filed with a comment, the agency does not place it in the
docket. It is held in a separate file to which the public does not have
access, and the FAA places a note in the docket that it has received
it. If the FAA receives a request to examine or copy this information,
it treats it as any other request under the Freedom of Information Act
(5 U.S.C. 552). The FAA processes such a request under Department of
Transportation procedures found in 49 CFR part 7.

B. Availability of Guidance Material

    An electronic copy of the guidance material documents may be
obtained from the Internet by--
    1. Searching the Federal eRulemaking Portal (http://www.regulations.gov);
    2. Visiting the FAA's Regulations and Policies Web page at http://www.faa.gov/regulations_policies or
    3. Accessing the Government Printing Office's Web page at http://www.gpoaccess.gov/fr/index.html.
    Copies may also be obtained by sending a request to the Federal
Aviation Administration, Office of Rulemaking, ARM-1, 800 Independence
Avenue SW., Washington, DC 20591, or by calling<PHONE_NUMBER>.
Commenters must identify the docket for this guidance material.

    Issued in Washington, DC, on December 6, 2011.
John M. Allen,
Director, Flight Standards Service.
[FR Doc. 2011-31976 Filed 12-12-11; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910-13-P


[Federal Register: June 6, 2007 (Volume 72, Number 108)]
[Notices]
[Page 31311]
[DOCID:fr06jn07-73]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission

[Docket No. RP07-396-001]

Tennessee Gas Pipeline Company; Notice of Compliance Filing

May 31, 2007.
    Take notice that on May 23, 2007, Tennessee Gas Pipeline Company
(Tennessee) tendered for filing as part of its FERC Gas Tariff, Fifth
Revised Volume No. 1, the following tariff sheets, effective May 9,
2007:

Substitute Ninth Revised Sheet No. 324
Substitute Fifth Revised Sheet No. 324A

    Any person desiring to protest this filing must file in accordance
with Rule 211 of the Commission's Rules of Practice and Procedure (18
CFR 385.211). Protests to this filing will be considered by the
Commission in determining the appropriate action to be taken, but will
not serve to make protestants parties to the proceeding. Such protests
must be filed in accordance with the provisions of Section 154.210 of
the Commission's regulations (18 CFR 154.210). Anyone filing a protest
must serve a copy of that document on all the parties to the
proceeding.
    The Commission encourages electronic submission of protests in lieu
of paper using the ``eFiling'' link at http://www.ferc.gov. Persons

unable to file electronically should submit an original and 14 copies
of the protest to the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission, 888 First
Street, NE., Washington, DC 20426.
    This filing is accessible on-line at http://www.ferc.gov, using the

``eLibrary'' link and is available for review in the Commission's
Public Reference Room in Washington, DC. There is an ``eSubscription''
link on the Web site that enables subscribers to receive e-mail
notification when a document is added to a subscribed docket(s). For
assistance with any FERC Online service, please e-mail
<EMAIL_ADDRESS>or call<PHONE_NUMBER> (toll free). For

TTY, call<PHONE_NUMBER>.

Kimberly D. Bose,
Secretary.
 [FR Doc. E7-10840 Filed 6-5-07; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 6717-01-P


[Federal Register Volume 77, Number 43 (Monday, March 5, 2012)]
[Notices]
[Page 13125]
[FR Doc No: 2012-5262]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY

[FRL-9642-4]

Proposed Administrative Settlement Pursuant to the Comprehensive
Environmental Response, Compensation, and Liability Act

AGENCY: Environmental Protection Agency.

ACTION: Notice; request for public comment.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: In accordance with Section 122(h) of the Comprehensive
Environmental Response, Compensation, and Liability Act, as amended
(CERCLA), 42 U.S.C. 9622(h)(1), notice is hereby given of a proposed
administrative settlement concerning the Eagle Picher Carefree Battery
Superfund Site, located in Socorro, Socorro County, New Mexico.
    The settlement requires the one (1) settling party to pay a total
of $200,000.00 as payment of response costs to the Hazardous Substances
Superfund. The settlement includes a covenant not to sue pursuant to
Section 107 of CERCLA, 42, U.S.C. 9607.
    For thirty (30) days beginning the date of publication of this
notice, the Agency will receive written comments relating to this
notice and will receive written comments relating to the settlement.
The Agency will consider all comments received and may modify or
withdraw its consent to the settlement if comments received disclose
facts or considerations which indicate that the settlement is
inappropriate, improper, or inadequate. The Agency's response to any
comments received will be available for public inspection at 1445 Ross
Avenue, Dallas, Texas 75202-2733.

DATES: Comments must be submitted on or before April 4, 2012.

ADDRESSES: The proposed settlement and additional background
information relating to the settlement are available for public
inspection at 1445 Ross Avenue Dallas, Texas 75202-2733. A copy of the
proposed settlement may be obtained from Robert Werner, Enforcement
Officer, 1445 Ross Avenue, Dallas, Texas 75202-2733 or by calling (214)
665-6724. Comments should reference the Eagle Picher Carefree Battery
Superfund Site, located in Socorro, Socorro County, New Mexico and EPA
CERCLA Docket Number 06-08-11, and should be addressed to Robert
Werner, Enforcement Officer, at the address listed above.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Gloria Moran, Attorney, 1445 Ross
Avenue Dallas, Texas 75202-2733 or call<PHONE_NUMBER>.

     Dated: February 17, 2012.
 Al Armendariz,
Regional Administrator (6RA).
[FR Doc. 2012-5262 Filed 3-2-12; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6560-50-P


           MVAC RECOVER, RECOVER/RECYCLE OR RECOVER/RECYCLE/RECHARGE
                         EQUIPMENT CERTIFICATION FORM

SEND THIS FORM TO THE EPA
REGIONAL OFFICE LISTED UNDER YOUR STATE OR TERRITORY IN WHICH THE ESTABLISHMENT IS
LOCATED.

MAILING ADDRESSES CAN BE
FOUND ON THE REVERSE SIDE OF THIS FORM.
1 ____________________________     NAME OF ESTABLISHMENT
   ____________________________
     STREET
   ____________________________
     CITY, STATE, ZIP CODE
   ____________________________
     TELEPHONE NUMBER
2 ____________________________
     NAME OF EQUIPMENT MANUFACTURER & MODEL NUM
   ____________________________
     SERIAL NUMBER(S) YEAR

3 I certify that I have approved recover,
    recover/recycle, or recover/recycle/recharge
    equipment under Section 609 of the Clean Air
    Act. I certify that only properly trained and
    certified technicians operate the equipment and
    that the information given above is true and
    correct.
   ____________________________
     SIGNATURE OF OWNER/OPERATOR                 DATE
   ____________________________
     NAME (PRINT)                                                        TITLE

           MVAC RECOVER, RECOVER/RECYCLE OR RECOVER/RECYCLE/RECHARGE
                   EQUIPMENT CERTIFICATION FORM INSTRUCTIONS

Motor vehicle refrigerant recover, recover/recycle, or recover/recycle/recharge equipment must be
acquired by January 1, 1992 and certified to EPA on or before January 1, 1993 under Section 609 of the
Clean Air Act. To certify your equipment, please complete the above form according to the following
instructions and mail to the appropriate EPA region based on where your establishment is located.

1 Please provide the name, address, and telephone number of the establishment where the
    equipment is located.

2 Please provide the name brand, model number, year and serial number(s) of the equipment
    acquired for use at the above establishment.

3 The certification statement must be signed by the person who has acquired the equipment (the
  person may be the owner of the establishment or another responsible officer). The person who signs    is certifying that they have acquired the equipment, that each individual authorized to use the equipment is properly trained and certified, and that the information provided is true and correct.

EPA REGIONAL OFFICES

Send your form to the EPA office listed under the state or territory in which the
establishment is located.

Connecticut, Maine, Massachusetts, New Hampshire, Rhode Island, Vermont
      CAA section 609 Enforcement Contact; EPA Region I; Mail Code OES04-2; 5 Post Office Square; Boston, MA 02109

New York, New Jersey, Puerto Rico, Virgin Islands
      CAA section 609 Enforcement Contact; EPA Region II; Mail Code 2DECA-AC; 290Broadway, 21st Floor; New York, NY 10007-1866

Delaware, District of Columbia, Maryland, Pennsylvania, Virginia, West Virginia
      CAA section 609 Enforcement Contact; EPA Region III--Wheeling Office; Mail Code 3AP20; 1060 Chapline Street, Suite 303; Wheeling, WV 26003-2995

Alabama, Florida, Georgia, Kentucky, Mississippi, North Carolina, South Carolina,
      Tennessee
      CAA section 609 Enforcement Contact; EPA Region IV; Mail Code APT-AE; Atlanta Federal Center; 61 Forsyth Street, SW.; Atlanta, GA 30303-8960

Illinois, Indiana, Michigan, Minnesota, Ohio, Wisconsin
      CAA section 609 Enforcement Contact, EPA Region V; Mail Code AE17J; 77 West Jackson Blvd.; Chicago, IL 60604-3507

Arkansas, Louisiana, New Mexico, Oklahoma, Texas
      CAA section 609 Enforcement Contact; EPA Region VI; Mail Code 6EN-HM; 1445 Ross Avenue, Suite 1200; Dallas, Texas 75202

Iowa, Kansas, Missouri, Nebraska
      CAA section 609 Enforcement Contact; EPA Region VII; Mail Code AWMD/APCO; 901 North 5th Street; Kansas City, KS; 66101

Colorado, Montana, North Dakota, South Dakota, Utah, Wyoming
      CAA section 609 Enforcement Contact, EPA Region VIII, Mail Code 8ENE-AT,
      1595 Wynkoop St., Denver, CO 80202

American Samoa, Arizona, California, Guam, Hawaii, Nevada
      CAA section 609 Enforcement Contact; EPA Region IX; Mail Code AIR-5; 75
      Hawthorne Street; San Francisco, CA 94105

Alaska, Idaho, Oregon,Washington
      CAA section 609 Enforcement Contact; EPA Region X; Mail Code OAQ-107; 1200 Sixth Avenue; Seattle, WA 98101


[Federal Register Volume 83, Number 199 (Monday, October 15, 2018)]
[Proposed Rules]
[Pages 51895-51897]
[FR Doc No: 2018-22175]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION

Federal Aviation Administration

14 CFR Part 71

[Docket No. FAA-2018-0829; Airspace Docket No. 18-AGL-23]
RIN 2120-AA66

Proposed Amendment of Class D and E Airspace; Milwaukee, WI

AGENCY: Federal Aviation Administration (FAA), DOT.

ACTION: Notice of proposed rulemaking (NPRM).

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: This action proposes to amend Class D airspace and Class E
airspace extending upward from 700 feet above the surface at Lawrence
J. Timmerman Airport, Milwaukee, WI. The FAA is proposing this action
as the result of an airspace review caused by the decommissioning of
the Timmerman VHF omnidirectional range (VOR) navigation aid, which
provided navigation information for the instrument procedures at this
airport, as part of the VOR Minimum Operational Network (MON) Program.
This action would also replace the outdated term ``Airport/Facility
Directory'' with ``Chart Supplement''. Airspace redesign is necessary
for the safety and management of instrument flight rules (IFR)
operations at this airport.

DATES: Comments must be received on or before November 29, 2018.

ADDRESSES: Send comments on this proposal to the U.S. Department of
Transportation, Docket Operations, West Building Ground Floor, Room
W12-140, 1200 New Jersey Avenue SE, Washington, DC 20590; telephone
(202) 366-9826, or<PHONE_NUMBER>. You must identify FAA Docket No.
FAA-2018-0829; Airspace Docket No. 18-AGL-23, at the beginning of your
comments. You may also submit comments through the internet at http://www.regulations.gov. You may review the public docket containing the
proposal, any comments received, and any final disposition in person in
the Dockets Office between 9:00 a.m. and 5:00 p.m., Monday through
Friday, except federal holidays.
    FAA Order 7400.11C, Airspace Designations and Reporting Points, and
subsequent amendments can be viewed online at http://www.faa.gov/air_traffic/publications/. For further information, you can contact the
Airspace Policy Group, Federal Aviation Administration, 800
Independence Avenue SW, Washington, DC 20591; telephone: (202) 267-
8783. The Order is also available for inspection at the National
Archives and Records Administration (NARA). For information on the
availability of FAA Order 7400.11C at NARA, call<PHONE_NUMBER>, or go
to http://www.archives.gov/federal-register/cfr/ibr-locations.html.
    FAA Order 7400.11, Airspace Designations and Reporting Points, is
published yearly and effective on September 15.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Jeffrey Claypool, Federal Aviation
Administration, Operations Support Group, Central Service Center, 10101
Hillwood Parkway, Fort Worth, TX 76177; telephone<PHONE_NUMBER>.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

Authority for This Rulemaking

    The FAA's authority to issue rules regarding aviation safety is
found in Title 49 of the United States Code. Subtitle I, Section 106
describes the authority of the FAA Administrator. Subtitle VII,
Aviation Programs, describes in more detail the scope of the agency's
authority. This rulemaking is promulgated under the authority described
in Subtitle VII, Part A, Subpart I, Section 40103. Under that section,
the FAA is charged with prescribing regulations to assign the use of
airspace necessary to ensure the safety of aircraft and the efficient
use of airspace. This regulation is within the scope of that authority
as it would amend Class D airspace and Class E airspace extending
upward from 700 feet above the surface at Lawrence J. Timmerman
Airport, Milwaukee, WI, to support IFR operations at this airport.

Comments Invited

    Interested parties are invited to participate in this proposed
rulemaking by submitting such written data, views, or arguments, as
they may desire. Comments that provide the factual basis supporting the
views and suggestions presented are particularly helpful in developing
reasoned regulatory decisions on the proposal. Comments are
specifically invited on the overall regulatory, aeronautical, economic,
environmental, and energy-related aspects of the proposal.
Communications should identify both docket numbers and be submitted in

triplicate to the address listed above. Commenters wishing the FAA to
acknowledge receipt of their comments on this notice must submit with
those comments a self-addressed, stamped postcard on which the
following statement is made: ``Comments to Docket No. FAA-2018-0829;
Airspace Docket No. 18-AGL-23.'' The postcard will be date/time stamped
and returned to the commenter.
    All communications received before the specified closing date for
comments will be considered before taking action on the proposed rule.
The proposal contained in this notice may be changed in light of the
comments received. A report summarizing each substantive public contact
with FAA personnel concerned with this rulemaking will be filed in the
docket.

Availability of NPRMs

    An electronic copy of this document may be downloaded through the
internet at http://www.regulations.gov. Recently published rulemaking
documents can also be accessed through the FAA's web page at http://www.faa.gov/air_traffic/publications/airspace_amendments/.
    You may review the public docket containing the proposal, any
comments received, and any final disposition in person in the Dockets
Office (see the ADDRESSES section for the address and phone number)
between 9:00 a.m. and 5:00 p.m., Monday through Friday, except federal
holidays. An informal docket may also be examined during normal
business hours at the Federal Aviation Administration, Air Traffic
Organization, Central Service Center, Operations Support Group, 10101
Hillwood Parkway, Fort Worth, TX 76177.

Availability and Summary of Documents for Incorporation by Reference

    This document proposes to amend FAA Order 7400.11C, Airspace
Designations and Reporting Points, dated August 13, 2018, and effective
September 15, 2018. FAA Order 7400.11C is publicly available as listed
in the ADDRESSES section of this document. FAA Order 7400.11C lists
Class A, B, C, D, and E airspace areas, air traffic service routes, and
reporting points.

The Proposal

    The FAA is proposing an amendment to Title 14 Code of Federal
Regulations (14 CFR) part 71 by:
    Amending Class D airspace to within a 3.9-mile radius (reduced from
a 4.4-mile radius) of Lawrence J. Timmerman Airport, Milwaukee, WI; and
updating the airspace designation from ``Milwaukee, Lawrence J.
Timmerman Airport, WI'' to ``Milwaukee, WI'', removing the city from
the airport name, and making an editorial change replacing ``Airport/
Facility Directory'' with ``Chart Supplement'' to comply with FAA Order
7400.2L, Procedures for Handling Airspace Matters; and
    Amending Class E airspace extending upward from 700 feet above the
surface to within a 6.4-mile radius (reduced from an 8.9-mile radius)
of Lawrence J. Timmerman Airport, Milwaukee, WI; adding an extension
within 2 miles each side of the 218[deg] bearing from Lawrence J.
Timmerman Airport extending from the 6.4-mile radius to 11.7 miles
southwest of the airport; adding an extension within 9 miles west and 6
miles east of the 328[deg] bearing from the Lawrence J. Timmerman: RWY
15L-LOC extending from the 6.4-mile radius to 10 miles northwest of the
airport.
    This action is necessary due to an airspace review caused by the
decommissioning of the Timmerman VOR, which provided navigation
information for the instrument procedures at these airports, as part of
the VOR MON Program.
    Class D and E airspace designations are published in paragraph 5000
and 6005, respectively, of FAA Order 7400.11C, dated August 13, 2018,
and effective September 15, 2018, which is incorporated by reference in
14 CFR 71.1. The Class D and E airspace designation listed in this
document will be published subsequently in the Order.

Regulatory Notices and Analyses

    The FAA has determined that this regulation only involves an
established body of technical regulations for which frequent and
routine amendments are necessary to keep them operationally current, is
non-controversial and unlikely to result in adverse or negative
comments. It, therefore: (1) Is not a ``significant regulatory action''
under Executive Order 12866; (2) is not a ``significant rule'' under
DOT Regulatory Policies and Procedures (44 FR 11034; February 26,
1979); and (3) does not warrant preparation of a regulatory evaluation
as the anticipated impact is so minimal. Since this is a routine matter
that will only affect air traffic procedures and air navigation, it is
certified that this rule, when promulgated, would not have a
significant economic impact on a substantial number of small entities
under the criteria of the Regulatory Flexibility Act.

Environmental Review

    This proposal will be subject to an environmental analysis in
accordance with FAA Order 1050.1F, ``Environmental Impacts: Policies
and Procedures'' prior to any FAA final regulatory action.

List of Subjects in 14 CFR Part 71

    Airspace, Incorporation by reference, Navigation (air).

The Proposed Amendment

    Accordingly, pursuant to the authority delegated to me, the Federal
Aviation Administration proposes to amend 14 CFR part 71 as follows:

PART 71--DESIGNATION OF CLASS A, B, C, D, AND E AIRSPACE AREAS; AIR
TRAFFIC SERVICE ROUTES; AND REPORTING POINTS

0
1. The authority citation for 14 CFR part 71 continues to read as
follows:

    Authority: 49 U.S.C. 106(f), 106(g); 40103, 40113, 40120; E.O.
10854, 24 FR 9565, 3 CFR, 1959-1963 Comp., p. 389.

Sec.  71.1  [Amended]

0
2. The incorporation by reference in 14 CFR 71.1 of FAA Order 7400.11C,
Airspace Designations and Reporting Points, dated August 13, 2018, and
effective September 15, 2018, is amended as follows:

Paragraph 5000 Class D Airspace.

* * * * *

AGL WI D Milwaukee, WI [Amended]

Lawrence J. Timmerman Airport, WI
    (Lat. 43[deg]06'39'' N, long. 88[deg]02'04'' W)

    That airspace extending upward from the surface to and including
3,200 feet MSL within a 4.4-mile radius of Lawrence J. Timmerman
Airport, excluding that airspace within the Milwaukee, WI, Class C
airspace area. This Class D airspace area is effective during the
specific dates and times established in advance by a Notice to
Airmen. The effective date and time will thereafter be continuously
published in the Chart Supplement.

Paragraph 6005 Class E Airspace Areas Extending Upward From 700
Feet or More Above the Surface of the Earth.

* * * * *

AGL WI E5 Milwaukee, WI [Amended]

General Mitchell International Airport, WI
    (Lat. 42[deg]56'49'' N, long. 87[deg]53'49'' W)
Batten International Airport, WI
    (Lat. 42[deg]45'40'' N, long. 87[deg]48'50'' W)
Waukesha County Airport, WI
    (Lat. 43[deg]02'28'' N, long. 88[deg]14'13'' W)
Lawrence J. Timmerman Airport, WI
    (Lat. 43[deg]06'37'' N, long. 88[deg]02'04'' W)
Lawrence J. Timmerman: RWY 15L-LOC
    (Lat. 43[deg]06'20'' N, long. 88[deg]01'44'' W)

    That airspace extending upward from 700 feet above the surface
within a 8.4-mile

radius of General Mitchell International Airport, and within an 6.6-
mile radius of Batten International Airport, and within a 7.5-mile
radius of Waukesha County Airport, and within 2 miles each side of
the 282[deg] bearing from Waukesha County Airport extending from the
7.5-mile radius to 10.5 miles west of Waukesha County Airport, and
within a 6.4-mile radius of Lawrence J. Timmerman Airport, and
within 2 miles each side of the 218[deg] bearing from the Lawrence
J. Timmerman Airport extending from the 6.4-mile radius to 11.7
miles northwest of Lawrence J. Timmerman Airport, and within 9 miles
west and 6 miles east of the 328[deg] bearing from the Lawrence J.
Timmerman: RWY15-LOC extending from the 6.4-mile radius to 10 miles
from the Lawrence J. Timmerman Airport.

    Issued in Fort Worth, Texas, on October 3, 2018.
Walter Tweedy,
Acting Manager, Operations Support Group, ATO Central Service Center.
[FR Doc. 2018-22175 Filed 10-12-18; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910-13-P


of the three Market Activity Fees since Fiscal Year 2011. As
mentioned above, the Transaction Fee was last raised in Fiscal Year
2011 and the Trade Count Fee was initiated in Fiscal Year 2011 as
the technology fee. The Underwriting Fee was not changed in Fiscal
Year 2011 but was last changed in Fiscal Year 2016, when it was
reduced. In addition, the annual and initial fees paid by both
dealers and municipal advisory firms were last raised in Fiscal Year
2016.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    The proposed Annual Rate Card Process would introduce a new fee
structure to reduce year-to-year fluctuation in the amount of market-
based fees paid by each regulated entity over time. The MSRB believes
that the proposed Annual Rate Card Process would not have an impact on
competition and, consequently, would not impose any burden on
competition, relieve a burden on competition, nor promote competition.
The MSRB believes the proposed rate increase for the Fiscal Year 2023
Annual Rate Card (extending to December 2023) is necessary and
appropriate to ensure prudent funding for the Board and that such fee
increases are reasonably and fairly designed to be proportionately
distributed across regulated entities in such a way that would not harm
competition among regulated entities, nor otherwise harm the
functioning of the municipal securities market. As a result, the Board
does not believe that the proposed rate increase would result in any
burden on competition that is not necessary or appropriate in
furtherance of the purposes of the Act, as it would be applicable to
all regulated entities. The Board also believes that no firm would be
unduly burdened as compared to another firm in terms of the proposed
rate increase. Dealers with different levels of underwriting and
trading activities as well as municipal advisory firms with a range of
headcounts would all be impacted proportionately by the proposed Annual
Rate Card Process, including the proposed increases for the rates of
assessment for the Fiscal Year 2023 Annual Rate Card.

C. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement on Comments on the Proposed
Rule Change Received From Members, Participants, or Others

    The Board did not solicit comment on the proposed rule change.
Therefore, there are no comments on the proposed rule change received
from members, participants, or others.

III. Date of Effectiveness of the Proposed Rule Change and Timing for
Commission Action

    The foregoing rule change related to the Rate Card Amendments has
become effective pursuant to Section 19(b)(3)(A) of the Act \116\ and
paragraph (f) of Rule 19b-4 \117\ thereunder. Because the foregoing
proposed rule change related to the Technical Amendments does not: (i)
significantly affect the protection of investors or the public
interest; (ii) impose any significant burden on competition; and (iii)
become operative for 30 days from the date on which it was filed, or
such shorter time as the Commission may designate, it has become
effective pursuant to Section 19(b)(3)(A) of the Act \118\ and Rule
19b-4(f)(6) \119\ thereunder.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \116\ 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(3)(A).
    \117\ 17 CFR 240.19b-4(f).
    \118\ 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(3)(A).
    \119\ 17 CFR 240.19b-4(f)(6).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    At any time within 60 days of the filing of the proposed rule
change, the Commission summarily may temporarily suspend such rule
change if it appears to the Commission that such action is necessary or
appropriate in the public interest, for the protection of investors, or
otherwise in furtherance of the purposes of the Act.

IV. Solicitation of Comments

    Interested persons are invited to submit written data, views, and
arguments concerning the foregoing, including whether the proposed rule
change is consistent with the Act. Comments may be submitted by any of
the following methods:

Electronic Comments

     Use the Commission's internet comment form (http://www.sec.gov/rules/sro.shtml); or
     Send an email to [email protected]. Please include
File Number SR-MSRB-2022-03 on the subject line.

Paper Comments

     Send paper comments in triplicate to Secretary, Securities
and Exchange Commission, 100 F Street NE, Washington, DC 20549.

    All submissions should refer to File Number SR-MSRB-2022-03. This
file number should be included on the subject line if email is used. To
help the Commission process and review your comments more efficiently,
please use only one method. The Commission will post all comments on
the Commission's internet website (http://www.sec.gov/

rules/sro.shtml). Copies of the submission, all subsequent amendments,
all written statements with respect to the proposed rule change that
are filed with the Commission, and all written communications relating
to the proposed rule change between the Commission and any person,
other than those that may be withheld from the public in accordance
with the provisions of 5 U.S.C. 552, will be available for website
viewing and printing in the Commission's Public Reference Room, 100 F
Street NE, Washington, DC 20549 on official business days between the
hours of 10:00 a.m. and 3:00 p.m. Copies of the filing also will be
available for inspection and copying at the principal office of the
MSRB. All comments received will be posted without change. Persons
submitting comments are cautioned that we do not redact or edit
personal identifying information from comment submissions. You should
submit only information that you wish to make available publicly. All
submissions should refer to File Number SR-MSRB-2022-03 and should be
submitted on or before July 6, 2022.

    For the Commission, pursuant to delegated authority.\120\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \120\ 17 CFR 200.30-3(a)(12).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

J. Matthew DeLesDernier,
Assistant Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2022-12839 Filed 6-14-22; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 8011-01-P


                                                                                Appendix A:                     Current Information Collection Requests                               Associated with the                        Greenhouse Gas Reporting Program

List of Rulemakings Associated with the GHGRP Title OMB Control Number EPA ICR Number Information Collection Request for the GHGRP 2060-0620 2300.10 GWP Change

ICR Change Memo (EPA-HQ-OAR-2012-0934-0126) Inputs Rule 2060-0629 2300.12 Subpart W amendments 2060-0620 2300.15 Fluorinated Gas amendments 2060-0650 2373.05 Mobile Sources


[Federal Register Volume 82, Number 236 (Monday, December 11, 2017)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Pages 58116-58118]
[FR Doc No: 2017-26539]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY

40 CFR Part 52

[EPA-R05-OAR-2016-0327; FRL-9971-61-Region 5]

Air Plan Approval; Minnesota; 2008 Ozone Transport

AGENCY: Environmental Protection Agency (EPA).

ACTION: Final rule.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) is approving a May
26, 2016, State Implementation Plan (SIP) submission from Minnesota
that is intended to demonstrate that the Minnesota SIP meets certain
interstate transport requirements of the Clean Air Act (CAA) for the
2008 ozone National Ambient Air Quality Standards (NAAQS). EPA is
approving this SIP as containing adequate provisions to ensure that
Minnesota emissions do not significantly contribute to nonattainment or
interfere with maintenance of the 2008 ozone NAAQS in any other state.
The proposed rulemaking associated with this final action was published
on July 17, 2017, and EPA received no comments during the comment
period, which ended on August 16, 2017.

DATES: This final rule is effective on January 10, 2018.

ADDRESSES: EPA has established a docket for this action under Docket ID
No. EPA-R05-OAR-2016-0327. All documents in the docket are listed on
the www.regulations.gov Web site. Although listed in the index, some
information is not publicly available, i.e., Confidential Business
Information (CBI) or other information whose disclosure is restricted
by statute. Certain other material, such as copyrighted material, is
not placed on the Internet and will be publicly available only in hard
copy form. Publicly available docket materials are available either
through www.regulations.gov or at the Environmental Protection Agency,
Region 5, Air and Radiation Division, 77 West Jackson Boulevard,
Chicago, Illinois 60604. This facility is open from 8:30 a.m. to 4:30
p.m., Monday through Friday, excluding Federal holidays. We recommend
that you telephone Eric Svingen, Environmental Engineer, at (312) 353-
4489 before visiting the Region 5 office.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Eric Svingen, Environmental Engineer,
Attainment Planning and Maintenance Section, Air Programs Branch (AR-
18J), Environmental Protection Agency, Region 5, 77 West Jackson
Boulevard, Chicago, Illinois 60604,<PHONE_NUMBER>,
[email protected].

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Throughout this document whenever ``we,''
``us,'' or ``our'' is used, we mean EPA. This supplementary information
section is arranged as follows:

I. Background
II. EPA's Analysis of Minnesota's Submittal
III. What action is EPA taking?
IV. Statutory and Executive Order Reviews

I. Background

    On March 12, 2008, EPA revised the levels of the primary and
secondary ozone standards from 0.08 parts per million (ppm) to 0.075
ppm (73 FR 16436). The CAA requires states to submit, within three
years after promulgation of a new or revised standard, SIPs meeting the
applicable ``infrastructure'' elements of sections 110(a)(1) and (2).
One of these applicable infrastructure elements, CAA section
110(a)(2)(D)(i), requires SIPs to contain ``good neighbor'' provisions
to prohibit certain adverse air quality effects on neighboring states
due to interstate transport of pollution. There are four sub-elements
within CAA section 110(a)(2)(D)(i). This action addresses the first two
sub-elements of the good neighbor provisions, at CAA section
110(a)(2)(D)(i)(I). These sub-elements require that each SIP for a new
or revised standard contain adequate provisions to prohibit any source
or other type of emissions activity within the state from emitting air
pollutants that will ``contribute significantly to nonattainment'' or
``interfere with maintenance'' of the applicable air quality standard
in any other state.

II. EPA's Analysis of Minnesota's Submittal

    On May 26, 2016, the State of Minnesota submitted a revision to its
SIP to address the first two sub-elements of the good neighbor
provisions, at CAA section 110(a)(2)(D)(i)(I). Specifically,
Minnesota's submission asserts that the state's SIP contains adequate
provisions to prohibit any source or other type of emissions activity
within the state from emitting air pollutants that will ``contribute
significantly to nonattainment'' or ``interfere with maintenance'' of
the 2008 ozone standard in any other state. The SIP submission
highlights rules and statutes already in Minnesota's SIP that limit
emissions of nitrogen oxides (NOX) and volatile organic
compounds (VOC), the precursor pollutants contributing to ozone
formation. The submission also notes that Minnesota sources are subject
to a Federal Implementation Plan (FIP) for the Cross-State Air
Pollution Rule (CSAPR) at 40 CFR 52.1240, and are required to reduce
annual emissions of NOX in support of the 2006 NAAQS for
fine particulate matter (PM2.5).
    EPA developed technical information and a related analysis to
assist states with meeting section 110(a)(2)(D)(i)(I) requirements for
the 2008 ozone NAAQS, and used this technical analysis to support the
CSAPR Update for the 2008 Ozone NAAQS (``CSAPR Update'').\1\ EPA's
analysis confirms the assertion in Minnesota's submittal: Minnesota
does not significantly contribute to nonattainment or interfere with
maintenance of the 2008 ozone standard in any other state.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \1\ 81 FR 74504 (October 26, 2016).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    On July 17, 2017 (82 FR 32673), EPA published a rule proposing to
approve Minnesota's interstate transport SIP for purposes of meeting
the CAA section

110(a)(2)(D)(i)(I) requirements of the 2008 ozone standard. This
proposed rule contained a detailed evaluation of how Minnesota's
submission satisfies CAA requirements. No comments were received.
Therefore, EPA is finalizing this rule as proposed.

III. What action is EPA taking?

    EPA is approving Minnesota's interstate transport SIP for purposes
of meeting the CAA section 110(a)(2)(D)(i)(I) requirements of the 2008
ozone standard.

IV. Statutory and Executive Order Reviews

    Under the CAA, the Administrator is required to approve a SIP
submission that complies with the provisions of the CAA and applicable
Federal regulations. 42 U.S.C. 7410(k); 40 CFR 52.02(a). Thus, in
reviewing SIP submissions, EPA's role is to approve state choices,
provided that they meet the criteria of the CAA. Accordingly, this
action merely approves state law as meeting Federal requirements and
does not impose additional requirements beyond those imposed by state
law. For that reason, this action:
     Is not a significant regulatory action subject to review
by the Office of Management and Budget under Executive Orders 12866 (58
FR 51735, October 4, 1993) and 13563 (76 FR 3821, January 21, 2011);
     Is not an Executive Order 13771 (82 FR 9339, February 2,
2017) regulatory action because SIP approvals are exempted under
Executive Order 12866;
     Does not impose an information collection burden under the
provisions of the Paperwork Reduction Act (44 U.S.C. 3501 et seq.);
     Is certified as not having a significant economic impact
on a substantial number of small entities under the Regulatory
Flexibility Act (5 U.S.C. 601 et seq.);
     Does not contain any unfunded mandate or significantly or
uniquely affect small governments, as described in the Unfunded
Mandates Reform Act of 1995 (Pub. L. 104-4);
     Does not have Federalism implications as specified in
Executive Order 13132 (64 FR 43255, August 10, 1999);
     Is not an economically significant regulatory action based
on health or safety risks subject to Executive Order 13045 (62 FR
19885, April 23, 1997);
     Is not a significant regulatory action subject to
Executive Order 13211 (66 FR 28355, May 22, 2001);
     Is not subject to requirements of Section 12(d) of the
National Technology Transfer and Advancement Act of 1995 (15 U.S.C. 272
note) because application of those requirements would be inconsistent
with the CAA; and
     Does not provide EPA with the discretionary authority to
address, as appropriate, disproportionate human health or environmental
effects, using practicable and legally permissible methods, under
Executive Order 12898 (59 FR 7629, February 16, 1994).
    In addition, the SIP is not approved to apply on any Indian
reservation land or in any other area where EPA or an Indian tribe has
demonstrated that a tribe has jurisdiction. In those areas of Indian
country, the rule does not have tribal implications and will not impose
substantial direct costs on tribal governments or preempt tribal law as
specified by Executive Order 13175 (65 FR 67249, November 9, 2000).
    The Congressional Review Act, 5 U.S.C. 801 et seq., as added by the
Small Business Regulatory Enforcement Fairness Act of 1996, generally
provides that before a rule may take effect, the agency promulgating
the rule must submit a rule report, which includes a copy of the rule,
to each House of the Congress and to the Comptroller General of the
United States. EPA will submit a report containing this action and
other required information to the U.S. Senate, the U.S. House of
Representatives, and the Comptroller General of the United States prior
to publication of the rule in the Federal Register. A major rule cannot
take effect until 60 days after it is published in the Federal
Register. This action is not a ``major rule'' as defined by 5 U.S.C.
804(2).
    Under section 307(b)(1) of the CAA, petitions for judicial review
of this action must be filed in the United States Court of Appeals for
the appropriate circuit by February 9, 2018. Filing a petition for
reconsideration by the Administrator of this final rule does not affect
the finality of this action for the purposes of judicial review nor
does it extend the time within which a petition for judicial review may
be filed, and shall not postpone the effectiveness of such rule or
action. This action may not be challenged later in proceedings to
enforce its requirements. (See section 307(b)(2).)

List of Subjects in 40 CFR Part 52

    Environmental protection, Air pollution control, Incorporation by
reference, Intergovernmental relations, Nitrogen dioxide, Ozone,
Volatile organic compounds.

    Dated: November 17, 2017.
Robert A. Kaplan,
Acting Regional Administrator, Region 5.

    40 CFR part 52 is amended as follows:

PART 52--APPROVAL AND PROMULGATION OF IMPLEMENTATION PLANS

0
1. The authority citation for part 52 continues to read as follows:

    Authority:  42 U.S.C. 7401 et seq.

0
2. In Sec.  52.1220, the table in paragraph (e) is amended by revising
the entry for ``Section 110(a)(2) Infrastructure Requirements for the
2008 ozone NAAQS'' to read as follows:

Sec.  52.1220  Identification of plan.

* * * * *
    (e) * * *

                                                     EPA-Approved Minnesota Nonregulatory Provisions
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
                                         Applicable geographic or         State submittal date/
 Name of nonregulatory SIP provision        nonattainment area                effective date            EPA approved date              Comments
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

                                                                      * * * * * * *
Section 110(a)(2) Infrastructure      Statewide.....................  6/12/2014 and                  12/11/2017, [Insert     These actions address the
 Requirements for the 2008 ozone                                      5/26/2016....................   Federal Register        following CAA elements:
 NAAQS.                                                                                citation].              110(a)(2)(A), (B), (C),
                                                                                (D), (E), (F), (G), (H),
                                                                                (J), (K), (L), and (M). We
                                                                                have not taken action on
                                                                                the visibility portion of
                                                                                (D)(i)(II). We will
                                                                                address these requirements
                                                                                in a separate action. EPA
                                                                                has disapproved the
                                                                                elements related to the
                                                                                prevention of significant
                                                                                deterioration,
                                                                                specifically as they
                                                                                pertain to section
                                                                                110(a)(2)(C), (D)(i)(II),
                                                                                (D)(ii), and (J); however,
                                                                                Minnesota continues to
                                                                                implement the Federally
                                                                                promulgated rules for this
                                                                                purpose.

                                                                      * * * * * * *
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

[FR Doc. 2017-26539 Filed 12-8-17; 8:45 am]
 BILLING CODE 6560-50-P