[Federal Register Volume 87, Number 249 (Thursday, December 29, 2022)]
[Notices]
[Pages 80212-80213]
[FR Doc No: 2022-28295]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

[Release No. 34-96570; File No. SR-CBOE-2022-057]

Self-Regulatory Organizations; Cboe Exchange, Inc.; Notice of
Designation of Longer Period for Commission Action on a Proposed Rule
Change To Increase the Position and Exercise Limits for Options on
Apple Inc. Stock

December 22, 2022.
    On November 7, 2022, Cboe Exchange, Inc. filed with the Securities
and Exchange Commission (the ``Commission''), pursuant to Section
19(b)(1) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (the ``Act''),\1\ and
Rule 19b-4 thereunder,\2\ a proposed rule change to increase the
position and exercise limits for options on Apple Inc. stock
(``AAPL''). The proposed rule change was published for comment in the
Federal Register on November 25, 2022.\3\ The Commission has received
no comment letters regarding the proposed rule change.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \1\ 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(1).
    \2\ 17 CFR 240.19b-4.
    \3\ See Securities Exchange Act Release No. 96353 (Nov. 18,
2022), 87 FR 72568.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    Section 19(b)(2) of the Act \4\ provides that within 45 days of the
publication of notice of the filing of a proposed rule change, or
within such longer period up

to 90 days as the Commission may designate if it finds such longer
period to be appropriate and publishes its reasons for so finding or as
to which the self-regulatory organization consents, the Commission
shall either approve the proposed rule change, disapprove the proposed
rule change, or institute proceedings to determine whether the proposed
rule change should be disapproved. The 45th day after publication of
the notice for this proposed rule change is January 9, 2023.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \4\ 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(2).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    The Commission is extending the 45-day time period for Commission
action on the proposed rule change. The Commission finds that it is
appropriate to designate a longer period within which to take action on
the proposed rule change so that it has sufficient time to consider the
proposed rule change. Accordingly, pursuant to Section 19(b)(2) of the
Act,\5\ the Commission designates February 23, 2023, as the date by
which the Commission shall either approve or disapprove, or institute
proceedings to determine whether to disapprove, the proposed rule
change (File No. SR-CBOE-2022-057).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \5\ Id.

    For the Commission, by the Division of Trading and Markets,
pursuant to delegated authority.\6\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \6\ 17 CFR 200.30-3(a)(31).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

Sherry R. Haywood,
Assistant Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2022-28295 Filed 12-28-22; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 8011-01-P


Memo to EPA Docket From: Andrew Beck Director, Public Outreach Office of the Administrator Jason Burnett Senior Policy Advisor Office of Air and Radiation On July 12, 2006, a group of industry representatives met with EPA Administrator Stephen Johnson to share a synopsis of their previously submitted comments. This memo summarizes their concerns. Industry representatives said that they were greatly concerned with the proposed revisions to the PM2.5 standard. They also said that need to replace the existing standard is unsubstantiated based on the fact that the current standard meets the legal requirement of being " requisite to protect the public health," and EPA's own studies show that the existing standard is even more protective than initially perceived in 1997. Additionally, industry representatives said that EPA's intent to move the goalpost before the existing standards are even implemented is an unreasonable burden to place on the States as they have not yet developed plans to implement the costly 1997 standard. They also said that an improper standard could have far reaching economic impacts on the United States, as energy prices will rise and manufacturing jobs will be forced to move off shore, causing increased consumer prices.

The group stated that the new science is ambiguous and does not compel more stringent PM2.5 NAAQS. Although many new studies have been published since the existing PM2.5 standards were established, the groups stated that EPA has chosen to " cherry pick" those studies which have selectively emphasized statistically significant reasons for tightening the standard, while discounting those studies that argue for the maintenance of the existing standard. The group also said that CASAC itself has overlooked the fact that under the current standard, health risks are lower than assumed in 1997. The Supreme Court has ruled that NAAQS are not a " zero risk" standard. Industry representatives said the cost of implementing a tighter standard, however, are fraught with risk. In order to meet EPA's proposed 15/ 35 standard, the United States will be forced to spend $ 20 60 billion/ year on top of the existing standard, and at the expense of other air quality programs. They also said that the integrity of the carefully crafted CAIR rules will be jeopardized by States forced to conform to a more stringent standard, and the number of nonattainment counties will rise under EPA's proposed revision. The consequences of being a nonattainment county will include stricter requirements for facilities; more restrictive and longer permitting processes; potential loss of federal highway and transit funding; and loss of industry and economic development, the group said.

The groups distributed materials that are also included in the docket.

The below list of stakeholders were present at the meeting: American Petroleum Institute Red Cavaney, President American Chemistry Council Jack Gerard, CEO Portland Cement Association Tom Gibson, Sr. Vice President, Government Affairs American Forest & Paper Association Donna Harman, Sr. VP, Government Affairs U. S. Chamber of Commerce William Kovacs, VP, Environment & Regulatory Affairs Edison Electric Institute Tom Kuhn, President Engine Manufacturers Association Jed Mandel, CEO American Electric Power for Utility Air Regulatory Group  John M. McNamus, VP, Environmental Services American Road & Transportation Builders Association T. Peter Ruane, CEO American Iron & Steel Institute Andrew Sharkey, President & CEO National Petrochemical & Refiners Association Bob Slaughter, President Hunton & Williams LLP Joe Stanko National Association of Manufacturers Jay Timmons, Sr. VP, Policy & Government Affairs and Bryan Brendle, Director, Air Quality Alliance of Automobile Manufacturers Fred Webber, CEO Associated General Contractors of America Stephen E. Sandherr, CEO EPA officials present were:

Administrator Steve Johnson Charles Ingebretson, Chief of Staff Jason Burnett, Office of Air & Radiation Andrew Beck, Office of Public Liaison


[Federal Register Volume 76, Number 71 (Wednesday, April 13, 2011)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Pages 20498-20500]
[FR Doc No: 2011-8196]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION

Federal Aviation Administration

14 CFR Part 39

[Docket No. FAA-2009-0703; Directorate Identifier 2009-NM-093-AD;
Amendment 39-16654; AD 2011-08-04]
RIN 2120-AA64

Airworthiness Directives; Bombardier, Inc. Model CL-600-2C10
(Regional Jet Series 700, 701 & 702) Airplanes, Model CL-600-2D15
(Regional Jet Series 705) Airplanes, and Model CL-600-2D24 (Regional
Jet Series 900) Airplanes

AGENCY: Federal Aviation Administration (FAA), Department of
Transportation (DOT).

ACTION: Final rule.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: We are adopting a new airworthiness directive (AD) for the
products listed above. This AD results from mandatory continuing
airworthiness information (MCAI) originated by an aviation authority of
another country to identify and correct an unsafe condition on an
aviation product. The MCAI describes the unsafe condition as:

    There have been four reports of loose or detached main landing
gear torque link apex pin locking plate and the locking plate
retainer bolt. This condition could result in torque link apex pin
disengagement, heavy vibration during landing, damage to main
landing gear components and subsequent main landing gear collapse.
* * * * *
We are issuing this AD to require actions to correct the unsafe
condition on these products.

DATES: This AD becomes effective May 18, 2011.
    The Director of the Federal Register approved the incorporation by
reference of a certain publication listed in this AD as of May 18,
2011.

ADDRESSES: You may examine the AD docket on the Internet at http://www.regulations.gov or in person at the U.S. Department of
Transportation, Docket Operations, M-30, West Building Ground Floor,
Room W12-140, 1200 New Jersey Avenue, SE., Washington, DC.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Craig Yates, Aerospace Engineer,
Airframe and Mechanical Systems Branch, ANE-171, FAA, New York Aircraft
Certification Office, 1600 Stewart Avenue, Suite 410, Westbury, New
York 11590; phone:<PHONE_NUMBER>; fax:<PHONE_NUMBER>; e-mail:
<EMAIL_ADDRESS>
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

Discussion

    We issued a supplemental notice of proposed rulemaking (NPRM) to
amend 14 CFR part 39 to include an AD that would apply to the specified
products. That supplemental NPRM was published in the Federal Register
on January 11, 2011 (76 FR 1556). That supplemental NPRM proposed to
correct an unsafe condition for the specified products. The MCAI
states:

    There have been four reports of loose or detached main landing
gear torque link apex pin locking plate and the locking plate
retainer bolt. This condition could result in torque link apex pin
disengagement, heavy vibration during landing, damage to main
landing gear components and subsequent main landing gear collapse.
    Investigation has determined that incorrect stack-up tolerances
of the apex joint or improper installation of the locking plate and
apex nut could result in torque link apex pin disengagement. This
directive mandates [a one-time detailed] inspection of the torque
link apex joint [for correct installation and damage, and corrective
actions if necessary] and replacement of the torque link apex nut.

The corrective actions include re-installing parts that are not
correctly installed and replacing damaged parts. You may obtain further
information by examining the MCAI in the AD docket.

Comments

    We gave the public the opportunity to participate in developing
this AD. We received no comments on the supplemental NPRM or on the
determination of the cost to the public.

Conclusion

    We reviewed the available data and determined that air safety and
the public interest require adopting the AD as proposed in the
supplemental NPRM.

Differences Between This AD and the MCAI or Service Information

    We have reviewed the MCAI and related service information and, in
general, agree with their substance. But we might have found it
necessary to use different words from those in the MCAI to ensure the
AD is clear for U.S. operators and is enforceable. In making these
changes, we do not intend to differ substantively from the information
provided in the MCAI and related service information.
    We might also have required different actions in this AD from those
in the MCAI in order to follow our FAA policies. Any such differences
are highlighted in a NOTE within the AD.

Costs of Compliance

    Based on the service information, we estimate that this AD will
affect about 361 products of U.S. registry. We also estimate that it
will take about 5 work-hours per product to comply with the basic
requirements of this AD. The average labor rate is $85 per work-hour.
Based on these figures, we estimate the cost of the AD on U.S.
operators to be $153,425, or $425 per product.

Authority for This Rulemaking

    Title 49 of the United States Code specifies the FAA's authority to
issue rules on aviation safety. Subtitle I, section 106, describes the
authority of the FAA Administrator. ``Subtitle VII: Aviation
Programs,'' describes in more detail the scope of the Agency's
authority.
    We are issuing this rulemaking under the authority described in
``Subtitle VII, Part A, Subpart III, Section 44701: General
requirements.'' Under that section, Congress charges the FAA with
promoting safe flight of civil aircraft in air commerce by prescribing
regulations for practices, methods, and procedures the Administrator
finds necessary for safety in air commerce. This regulation is within
the scope of that authority because it addresses an unsafe condition
that is likely to exist or develop on products identified in this
rulemaking action.

Regulatory Findings

    We determined that this AD will not have federalism implications
under Executive Order 13132. This AD will not have a substantial direct
effect on the States, on the relationship between the national
government and the States, or on the distribution of power and
responsibilities among the various levels of government.
    For the reasons discussed above, I certify this AD:
    1. Is not a ``significant regulatory action'' under Executive Order
12866;
    2. Is not a ``significant rule'' under the DOT Regulatory Policies
and Procedures (44 FR 11034, February 26, 1979); and
    3. Will not have a significant economic impact, positive or
negative, on a substantial number of small entities under the criteria
of the Regulatory Flexibility Act.
    We prepared a regulatory evaluation of the estimated costs to
comply with this AD and placed it in the AD docket.

Examining the AD Docket

    You may examine the AD docket on the Internet at http://www.regulations.gov; or in person at the Docket Operations office
between 9 a.m. and 5 p.m., Monday through Friday, except Federal
holidays. The AD docket contains the NPRM, the regulatory evaluation,
any comments received, and other information. The street address for
the Docket Operations office (telephone<PHONE_NUMBER>) is in the
ADDRESSES section. Comments will be available in the AD docket shortly
after receipt.

List of Subjects in 14 CFR Part 39

    Air transportation, Aircraft, Aviation safety, Incorporation by
reference, Safety.

Adoption of the Amendment

    Accordingly, under the authority delegated to me by the
Administrator, the FAA amends 14 CFR part 39 as follows:

PART 39--AIRWORTHINESS DIRECTIVES

0
1. The authority citation for part 39 continues to read as follows:

    Authority: 49 U.S.C. 106(g), 40113, 44701.

Sec.  39.13  [Amended]

0
2. The FAA amends Sec.  39.13 by adding the following new AD:

2011-08-04 Bombardier, Inc.: Amendment 39-16654. Docket No. FAA-
2009-0703; Directorate Identifier 2009-NM-093-AD.

Effective Date

    (a) This airworthiness directive (AD) becomes effective May 18,
2011.

Affected ADs

    (b) None.

Applicability

    (c) This AD applies to the Bombardier airplanes identified in
paragraphs (c)(1) and (c)(2) of this AD, certificated in any
category.
    (1) Model CL-600-2C10 (Regional Jet Series 700, 701 & 702)
airplanes, serial numbers (S/Ns) 10003 and subsequent.

    (2) Model CL-600-2D15 (Regional Jet Series 705) airplanes and
Model CL-600-2D24 (Regional Jet Series 900) airplanes, S/Ns 15001
and subsequent.

Subject

    (d) Air Transport Association (ATA) of America Code 32: Landing
gear.

Reason

    (e) The mandatory continuing airworthiness information (MCAI)
states:

    There have been four reports of loose or detached main landing
gear torque link apex pin locking plate and the locking plate
retainer bolt. This condition could result in torque link apex pin
disengagement, heavy vibration during landing, damage to main
landing gear components and subsequent main landing gear collapse.
    Investigation has determined that incorrect stack-up tolerances
of the apex joint or improper installation of the locking plate and
apex nut could result in torque link apex pin disengagement. This
directive mandates [a one-time detailed] inspection of the torque
link apex joint [for correct installation and damage, and corrective
actions if necessary] and replacement of the torque link apex nut.

Compliance

    (f) You are responsible for having the actions required by this
AD performed within the compliance times specified, unless the
actions have already been done.

Inspection for Part Number (P/N) and Serial Number (S/N)

    (g) For all airplanes identified in paragraphs (c)(1) and (c)(2)
of this AD: Within 900 flight hours after the effective date of this
AD, inspect the main landing gear (MLG) shock strut assemblies to
determine whether an MLG shock strut assembly having P/Ns 49000-11
through 49000-22 inclusive and a S/N 0001 through 0284 inclusive is
installed. A review of airplane maintenance records is acceptable in
lieu of this inspection if the part and serial numbers of the MLG
shock strut assembly can be conclusively determined from that
review.

Inspection of the Torque Link Apex Joint

    (h) For any MLG shock strut assembly having P/Ns 49000-11
through 49000-22 inclusive and a S/N 0001 through 0284 inclusive
found installed during the inspection or records check required by
paragraph (g) of this AD: Within 900 flight hours after the
effective date of this AD, perform a one-time detailed inspection
and all applicable corrective actions on the torque link apex joint,
in accordance with Part A of the Accomplishment Instructions of
Bombardier Service Bulletin 670BA-32-019, Revision A, dated
September 18, 2008, except as provided by paragraph (l) of this AD.
Do all applicable corrective actions before further flight.

Replacement or Rework of the Apex Nut

    (i) For any MLG shock strut assembly identified during the
inspection or records check required by paragraph (g) of this AD:
Within 4,500 flight hours after the effective date of this AD,
replace or rework the apex nut, in accordance with Part B of the
Accomplishment Instructions of Bombardier Service Bulletin 670BA-32-
019, Revision A, dated September 18, 2008.

Parts Installation

    (j) As of the effective date of this AD, no person may install,
on any airplane, a replacement MLG shock strut assembly identified
in paragraph (j)(1) or (j)(2) of this AD, unless it has been
reworked in accordance with paragraph B. of Part B of the
Accomplishment Instructions of Bombardier Service Bulletin 670BA-32-
019, Revision A, dated September 18, 2008.
    (1) Part numbers 49000-11 through 49000-22 inclusive, and with a
serial number in the range of S/Ns 0001 through 0284 inclusive (the
serial number can start with ``MA,'' ``MAL,'' or ``MA-'').
    (2) Part numbers 49050-5 through 49050-10 inclusive, and with a
serial number in the range of S/Ns 1001 through 1114 inclusive (the
serial number can start with ``MA,'' ``MAL,'' or ``MA-'').

Credit for Actions Accomplished in Accordance With Previous Service
Information

    (k) Inspections, corrective actions, replacements, and rework
accomplished before the effective date of this AD in accordance with
Bombardier Service Bulletin 670BA-32-019, dated March 16, 2006, are
considered acceptable for compliance with the corresponding actions
specified in this AD.
    (l) The inspections specified in paragraph (h) of this AD are
not required if the actions specified in paragraph (i) of this AD
have already been accomplished; or if Bombardier Repair Engineering
Order 670-32-11-0022, dated October 22, 2005, or Goodrich Service
Concession Request SCR 0056-05, dated October 22, 2005; has been
incorporated.

FAA AD Differences

    Note 1: The MCAI specifies to inspect only airplanes having
certain serial numbers that are part of the MCAI applicability.
Because the affected part could be rotated onto any of the airplanes
listed in the applicability, this AD requires that the inspection be
done on all airplanes. We have coordinated this with the Transport
Canada Civil Aviation (TCCA).

Other FAA AD Provisions

    (m) The following provisions also apply to this AD:
    (1) Alternative Methods of Compliance (AMOCs): The Manager, New
York Aircraft Certification Office (ACO), ANE-170, FAA, has the
authority to approve AMOCs for this AD, if requested using the
procedures found in 14 CFR 39.19. Send information to ATTN: Program
Manager, Continuing Operational Safety, FAA, New York ACO, 1600
Stewart Avenue, Suite 410, Westbury, New York 11590; telephone 516-
228-7300; fax<PHONE_NUMBER>. Before using any approved AMOC, notify
your appropriate principal inspector, or lacking a principal
inspector, the manager of the local flight standards district
office/certificate holding district office. The AMOC approval letter
must specifically reference this AD.
    (2) Airworthy Product: For any requirement in this AD to obtain
corrective actions from a manufacturer or other source, use these
actions if they are FAA-approved. Corrective actions are considered
FAA-approved if they are approved by the State of Design Authority
(or their delegated agent). You are required to assure the product
is airworthy before it is returned to service.

Special Flight Permits

    (n) Special flight permits, as described in Section 21.197 and
Section 21.199 of the Federal Aviation Regulations (14 CFR 21.197
and 21.199), are not allowed.

Related Information

    (o) Refer to MCAI Canadian Airworthiness Directive CF-2009-20,
dated May 1, 2009; and Bombardier Service Bulletin 670BA-32-019,
Revision A, dated September 18, 2008; for related information.

Material Incorporated by Reference

    (p) You must use Bombardier Service Bulletin 670BA-32-019,
Revision A, dated September 18, 2008, to do the actions required by
this AD, unless the AD specifies otherwise.
    (1) The Director of the Federal Register approved the
incorporation by reference of this service information under 5
U.S.C. 552(a) and 1 CFR part 51.
    (2) For service information identified in this AD, contact
Bombardier, Inc., 400 Cote-Vertu Road West, Dorval, Quebec H4S 1Y9,
Canada; phone:<PHONE_NUMBER>; fax:<PHONE_NUMBER>; e-mail:
<EMAIL_ADDRESS>Internet: http://www.bombardier.com.
    (3) You may review copies of the service information at the FAA,
Transport Airplane Directorate, 1601 Lind Avenue, SW., Renton,
Washington. For information on the availability of this material at
the FAA, call<PHONE_NUMBER>.
    (4) You may also review copies of the service information that
is incorporated by reference at the National Archives and Records
Administration (NARA). For information on the availability of this
material at NARA, call<PHONE_NUMBER>, or go to: http://www.archives.gov/federal_register/code_of_federal_regulations/ibr_locations.html.

    Issued in Renton, Washington, on March 23, 2011.
Kalene C. Yanamura,
Acting Manager, Transport Airplane Directorate, Aircraft Certification
Service.
[FR Doc. 2011-8196 Filed 4-12-11; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910-13-P


[Federal Register Volume 78, Number 33 (Tuesday, February 19, 2013)]
[Notices]
[Pages 11670-11671]
[FR Doc No: 2013-03696]

=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY

Coast Guard

[Docket No. USCG-2013-0049]

Eastern Great Lakes Area Maritime Security Committee; Vacancies

AGENCY: Coast Guard, DHS.

ACTION: Solicitation for membership.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: This notice solicits applications for membership in the Area
Maritime Security Committee, Eastern Great Lakes, and its five regional
subcommittees: Northeast Ohio Region, Northwestern Pennsylvania Region,
Western New York Region, Lake Ontario Region, and St. Lawrence Region.

DATES: Requests for membership should reach the U.S. Coast Guard
Captain of the Port, Buffalo, on March 21, 2013.

ADDRESSES: Applications for membership should be submitted to the
Captain of the Port Buffalo, Attention Regional Executive Coordinator,
1 Fuhrmann Boulevard, Buffalo, NY 14203-3189.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: For questions about submitting an
application, or about the Area Maritime Security Committee (AMSC) in
general, contact Mr. Timothy Balunis, Planning Department, U.S. Coast
Guard Sector Buffalo, 1 Fuhrmann Boulevard, Buffalo, NY 14203-3189;
716-843-9559. For questions about a particular regional subcommittee
contact: the Northeast Ohio Region Executive Coordinator, Mr. Peter
Killmer, at<PHONE_NUMBER>; the Northwestern Pennsylvania Region
Executive Coordinator, Mr. Joseph Fetscher, at<PHONE_NUMBER>; the
Western New York Region Executive Coordinator, Mr. Timothy Balunis, at
716-843-9559; the Lake Ontario Region Executive Coordinator, Mr. Ralph
Kring, at<PHONE_NUMBER>; and the St Lawrence Region Executive
Coordinator, Mr. Ralph Kring, at<PHONE_NUMBER>.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

Authority

    Section 102 of the Maritime Transportation Security Act (MTSA) of
2002 (Pub. L. 107-295) added section 70112 to Title 46 of the U.S.
Code, and authorized the Secretary of the Department in which the Coast
Guard is operating to establish Area Maritime Security Advisory
Committees (AMSCs) for any port area of the United States. (See 33
U.S.C. 1226; 46 U.S.C. 70112; 33 CFR 1.05-1, 6.01; Department of
Homeland Security Delegation No. 0170.1(97)). The MTSA includes a

provision exempting these AMSCs from the Federal Advisory Committee Act
(FACA), Public Law 92-436, 86 Stat. 470 (5 U.S.C. App.2).

AMSC, Eastern Great Lakes Purpose

    The AMSCs shall assist the Captain of the Port in the development,
review, update, and exercising of the Area Maritime Security (AMS) Plan
for their area of responsibility. Such matters may include, but are not
limited to: identifying critical port infrastructure and operations;
identifying risks (threats, vulnerabilities, and consequences);
determining mitigation strategies and implementation methods;
developing and describing the process to continually evaluate overall
port security by considering consequences and vulnerabilities, how they
may change over time, and what additional mitigation strategies can be
applied; and providing advice to, and assisting the Captain of the Port
in developing and maintaining the AMS Plan.

AMSC Composition

    The composition of an AMSC, including the AMSC, Eastern Great Lakes
and its subcommittees, is controlled by 33 CFR 103.305. Accordingly,
members may be selected from the Federal, Territorial, or Tribal
government; the State government and political subdivisions of the
State; local public safety, crisis management, and emergency response
agencies; law enforcement and security organizations; maritime
industry, including labor; other port stakeholders having a special
competence in maritime security; and port stakeholders affected by
security practices and policies. Also, members of the AMSC must have at
least 5 years of experience related to maritime or port security
operations.

AMSC, Eastern Great Lakes Vacancies

    Currently, there are multiple vacancies on the AMSC, Eastern Great
Lakes. Vacancies for each of the five regional subcommittees are as
follows:
    (1) Northeast Ohio Region (3 members): Executive Board member to
serve as Chairperson of the regional subcommittee and concurrently as
member of the AMSC, Eastern Great Lakes when so convened by the Federal
Maritime Security Coordinator (FMSC); Executive Board member
representing local MTSA-regulated (33 CFR Part 105) facilities of
Northeast Ohio; and an Executive Board member representing the maritime
(on-water) port harbormaster community of Northeast Ohio (e.g.,
qualified harbormasters operating in local ports of Vermilion, Lorain,
Cleveland, Fairport Harbor, Ashtabula, Conneaut, and other local
ports);
    (2) Northwestern Pennsylvania Region: no openings;
    (3) Western New York Region (1 member): Executive Board member
representing local MTSA-regulated (33 CFR Part 104) vessels of Western
New York;
    (4) Lake Ontario Region: no openings; and
    (5) St. Lawrence Region (2 members): Executive Board members to
serve as Chairperson and Vice Chairperson of the regional subcommittee,
and concurrently as members of the AMSC, Eastern Great Lakes when so
convened by the FMSC.

Applying for AMSC Membership

    Those seeking membership are not required to submit formal
applications. Because we have an obligation to ensure that a specific
number of members have the requisite maritime security experience,
however, we encourage the submission of resumes that highlight
experience in the maritime and security industries.
    Applicants may be required to pass an appropriate security
background check before appointment to the committee or one of its
subcommittees. The term of office for each vacancy is 5 years. However,
a member may serve one additional term of office. Members will not
receive any salary or other compensation for their service on the AMSC.
Applicants must register and remain active as Coast Guard HOMEPORT
users if appointed.
    In support of the policy of the Coast Guard on gender and ethnic
nondiscrimination, we encourage qualified men and women and members of
all racial and ethnic groups to apply. The Coast Guard values
diversity; all the different characteristics and attributes of persons
that enhance the mission of the Coast Guard.

    Dated: January 29, 2013.
J.S. Imahori,
Commander, U.S. Coast Guard, Acting Captain of the Port, Buffalo.
[FR Doc. 2013-03696 Filed 2-15-13; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 9110-04-P


[Federal Register: May 5, 2006 (Volume 71, Number 87)]
[Notices]
[Page 26487]
[DOCID:fr05my06-52]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission

[Docket No. RP97-374-007]

Northwest Pipeline Corporation; Notice of Filing

April 27, 2006.
    Take notice that on April 17, 2006, Northwest Pipeline Corporation
(Northwest) tendered for filing as part of its FERC Gas Tariff, Third
Revised Volume No. 1, Seventh Revised Sheet No. 376 to become effective
May 18, 2006.
    Northwest states that the purpose of this filing is to revise a
footnote to the list of negotiated rate service agreements in
Northwest's tariff.
    Any person desiring to protest this filing must file in accordance
with Rule 211 of the Commission's Rules of Practice and Procedure (18
CFR 385.211). Protests to this filing will be considered by the
Commission in determining the appropriate action to be taken, but will
not serve to make protestants parties to the proceeding. Such protests
must be filed in accordance with the provisions of section 154.210 of
the Commission's regulations (18 CFR 154.210). Anyone filing a protest
must serve a copy of that document on all the parties to the
proceeding.
    The Commission encourages electronic submission of protests in lieu
of paper using the ``eFiling'' link at http://www.ferc.gov. Persons

unable to file electronically should submit an original and 14 copies
of the protest to the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission, 888 First
Street, NE., Washington, DC 20426.
    This filing is accessible on-line at http://www.ferc.gov, using the

``eLibrary'' link and is available for review in the Commission's
Public Reference Room in Washington, DC. There is an ``eSubscription''
link on the Web site that enables subscribers to receive e-mail
notification when a document is added to a subscribed docket(s). For
assistance with any FERC Online service, please e-mail
<EMAIL_ADDRESS>or call<PHONE_NUMBER> (toll free). For

TTY, call<PHONE_NUMBER>.

Magalie R. Salas,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. E6-6833 Filed 5-4-06; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 6717-01-P