[Federal Register: August 12, 2009 (Volume 74, Number 154)]
[Notices]
[Page 40579-40580]
[DOCID:fr12au09-53]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission

Combined Notice of Filings  1

August 05, 2009.
    Take notice that the Commission received the following exempt
wholesale generator filings:

    Docket Numbers: EG09-76-000.
    Applicants: Sollunar Energy, Inc.
    Description: Amendment to Application of Sollunar Energy, Inc.
    Filed Date: 08/04/2009.
    Accession Number: 20090804-5092.
    Comment Date: 5 p.m. Eastern Time on Tuesday, August 25, 2009.

    Take notice that the Commission received the following electric
rate filings:

    Docket Numbers: ER97-4281-020.
    Applicants: NRG Power Marketing LLC, Louisiana Generating LLC,
Bayou Cove Peaking Power LLC, Big Cajun I Peaking Power LLC, NRG
Sterlington Power LLC.
    Description: NRG Power Marketing, LLC submits an amendment to its
6/30/09 request for classification as Category 1 seller in the Central
and Southwest Power Pool regions as amended on 7/22/09.
    Filed Date: 08/03/2009.
    Accession Number: 20090805-0017.
    Comment Date: 5 p.m. Eastern Time on Monday, August 24, 2009.

    Docket Numbers: ER99-1610-036; ER99-1610-037; ER98-4590-029; ER98-
2640-032.
    Applicants: Southwestern Public Service Company; Public Service
Company of Colorado; Northern States Power Companies.
    Description: Southwestern Public Service Company submits market-
based rate authorization Triennial Market Power Analysis and a change
in status report.
    Filed Date: 07/31/2009.
    Accession Number: 20090804-0158.
    Comment Date: 5 p.m. Eastern Time on Tuesday, September 29, 2009.

    Docket Numbers: ER07-1130-003; ER97-4143-021; ER98-2075-026; ER98-
542-023.
    Applicants: AEP Service Corporation, AEP Energy Partners, Inc., CSW
Energy Services, Inc., Central and South West Services, Inc.
    Description: American Electric Power Service Corporation submits
updated market power analysis.
    Filed Date: 07/31/2009.
    Accession Number: 20090805-0013.
    Comment Date: 5 p.m. Eastern Time on Tuesday, September 29, 2009.

    Docket Numbers: ER01-3103-018.
    Applicants: Astoria Energy LLC, Astoria Energy II LLC.
    Description: Astoria Energy Files Under Ord. 697-C re Astoria
Energy II.
    Filed Date: 07/31/2009.
    Accession Number: 20090731-5132.
    Comment Date: 5 p.m. Eastern Time on Friday, August 21, 2009.

    Docket Numbers: ER09-1412-001.
    Applicants: U.S. Energy Partners LLC.
    Description: US Energy Partners, LLC submits revised Petition for
Acceptance of Initial Tariff, Waivers and Blanket Authority.
    Filed Date: 08/04/2009.
    Accession Number: 20090805-0024.
    Comment Date: 5 p.m. Eastern Time on Tuesday, August 25, 2009.

    Docket Numbers: ER09-1426-002.
    Applicants: Lehman Brothers Commodity Services Inc.
    Description: Lehman Brothers Commodity Services, Inc. submits
notice of cancellation of First Revised FERC Electric Tariff No. 1,
effective 9/30/09.
    Filed Date: 07/31/2009.
    Accession Number: 20090804-0152.
    Comment Date: 5 p.m. Eastern Time on Friday, August 21, 2009.

    Docket Numbers: ER09-1541-000.
    Applicants: MidAmerican Energy Company.
    Description: MidAmerican Energy Company submits Affected Systems
Engineering and Procurement Agreement dated 7/24/09 with Interstate
Power and Light Co.
    Filed Date: 08/03/2009.
    Accession Number: 20090804-0153.
    Comment Date: 5 p.m. Eastern Time on Monday, August 24, 2009.

    Docket Numbers: ER09-1542-000.
    Applicants: California Independent System Operator Corporation.
    Description: California Independent System Operator Corporation
submits an amendment to its tariff etc.
    Filed Date: 08/03/2009.
    Accession Number: 20090804-0154.
    Comment Date: 5 p.m. Eastern Time on Monday, August 24, 2009.

    Docket Numbers: ER09-1543-000.
    Applicants: Midwest Independent Transmission System Operator, Inc.
    Description: Midwest Independent Transmission System Operator, Inc.
submits proposed revisions to Section 22.3 of its Open Access
Transmission, Energy and Operating Reserve Markets Tariff.
    Filed Date: 08/04/2009.
    Accession Number: 20090804-0161.
    Comment Date: 5 p.m. Eastern Time on Tuesday, August 25, 2009.

    Docket Numbers: ER09-1545-000.
    Applicants: Portland General Electric Company.
    Description: Portland General Electric Company submits Average
System Cost filing for sales of electric power to the Bonneville Power
Administration.
    Filed Date: 08/04/2009.
    Accession Number: 20090805-0022.
    Comment Date: 5 p.m. Eastern Time on Tuesday, August 25, 2009.

    Any person desiring to intervene or to protest in any of the above
proceedings must file in accordance with Rules 211 and 214 of the
Commission's Rules of Practice and Procedure (18 CFR 385.211 and
385.214) on or before 5 p.m. Eastern time on the specified comment
date. It is not necessary to separately intervene again in a subdocket
related to a compliance filing if you have previously intervened in the
same docket. Protests will be considered by the Commission in
determining the appropriate action to be taken, but will not serve to
make protestants parties to the proceeding. Anyone filing a motion to
intervene or protest must serve a copy of that document on the
Applicant. In reference to filings initiating a new proceeding,
interventions or protests submitted on or before the comment deadline
need not be served on persons other than the Applicant.
    The Commission encourages electronic submission of protests and
interventions in lieu of paper, using the FERC Online links at http://
www.ferc.gov. To facilitate electronic service, persons with Internet
access who will eFile a document and/or be listed as a contact for an
intervenor must create and validate an eRegistration account using the
eRegistration link. Select the eFiling link to log on and submit the
intervention or protests.
    Persons unable to file electronically should submit an original and
14 copies of the intervention or protest to the Federal Energy
Regulatory Commission,

888 First St., NE., Washington, DC 20426.
    The filings in the above proceedings are accessible in the
Commission's eLibrary system by clicking on the appropriate link in the
above list. They are also available for review in the Commission's
Public Reference Room in Washington, DC. There is an eSubscription link
on the Web site that enables subscribers to receive e-mail notification
when a document is added to a subscribed docket(s). For assistance with
any FERC Online service, please e-mail<EMAIL_ADDRESS>or
call<PHONE_NUMBER> (toll free). For TTY, call<PHONE_NUMBER>.

Nathaniel J. Davis, Sr.,
Deputy Secretary.
[FR Doc. E9-19267 Filed 8-11-09; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 6717-01-P


[Federal Register Volume 87, Number 123 (Tuesday, June 28, 2022)]
[Proposed Rules]
[Pages 38302-38304]
[FR Doc No: 2022-13681]

=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION

Federal Aviation Administration

14 CFR Part 39

[Docket No. FAA-2022-0801; Project Identifier MCAI-2022-00092-T]
RIN 2120-AA64

Airworthiness Directives; Airbus SAS Airplanes

AGENCY: Federal Aviation Administration (FAA), DOT.

ACTION: Notice of proposed rulemaking (NPRM).

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The FAA proposes to adopt a new airworthiness directive (AD)
for all Airbus SAS Model A350-941 and -1041 airplanes. This proposed AD
was prompted by a report indicating that the vertical stop support
fitting (VSSF) of certain captain's, first officer's, and third
occupant's seats could fail. This proposed AD would require modifying
or replacing each affected seat, as specified in a European Union
Aviation Safety Agency (EASA) AD, which is proposed for incorporation
by reference. This proposed AD would also limit the installation of
affected parts under certain conditions. The FAA is proposing this AD
to address the unsafe condition on these products.

DATES: The FAA must receive comments on this proposed AD by August 12,
2022.

ADDRESSES: You may send comments, using the procedures found in 14 CFR
11.43 and 11.45, by any of the following methods:
     Federal eRulemaking Portal: Go to https://www.regulations.gov. Follow the instructions for submitting comments.
     Fax:<PHONE_NUMBER>.
     Mail: U.S. Department of Transportation, Docket
Operations, M-30, West Building Ground Floor, Room W12-140, 1200 New
Jersey Avenue SE, Washington, DC 20590.
     Hand Delivery: Deliver to Mail address above between 9
a.m. and 5 p.m., Monday through Friday, except Federal holidays.
    For material that will be incorporated by reference (IBR) in this
AD, contact EASA, Konrad-Adenauer-Ufer 3, 50668 Cologne, Germany;
telephone +49 221 8999 000; email [email protected]; internet
www.easa.europa.eu. You may find this material on the EASA website at
https://ad.easa.europa.eu. You may view this material at the FAA,
Airworthiness Products Section, Operational Safety Branch, 2200 South
216th St., Des Moines, WA. For information on the availability of this
material at the FAA, call<PHONE_NUMBER>. It is also available in the AD
docket at https://www.regulations.gov by searching for and locating
Docket No. FAA-2022-0801.

Examining the AD Docket

    You may examine the AD docket at https://www.regulations.gov by
searching for and locating Docket No. FAA-2022-0801; or in person at
Docket Operations between 9 a.m. and 5 p.m., Monday through Friday,
except Federal holidays. The AD docket contains this

NPRM, the mandatory continuing airworthiness information (MCAI), any
comments received, and other information. The street address for Docket
Operations is listed above.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Dan Rodina, Aerospace Engineer, Large
Aircraft Section, International Validation Branch, FAA, 2200 South
216th Street, Des Moines, WA 98198, telephone and fax<PHONE_NUMBER>;
email [email protected].

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

Comments Invited

    The FAA invites you to send any written relevant data, views, or
arguments about this proposal. Send your comments to an address listed
under ADDRESSES. Include ``Docket No. FAA-2022-0801; Project Identifier
MCAI-2022-00092-T'' at the beginning of your comments. The most helpful
comments reference a specific portion of the proposal, explain the
reason for any recommended change, and include supporting data. The FAA
will consider all comments received by the closing date and may amend
this proposal because of those comments.
    Except for Confidential Business Information (CBI) as described in
the following paragraph, and other information as described in 14 CFR
11.35, the FAA will post all comments received, without change, to
https://www.regulations.gov, including any personal information you
provide. The agency will also post a report summarizing each
substantive verbal contact received about this NPRM.

Confidential Business Information

    CBI is commercial or financial information that is both customarily
and actually treated as private by its owner. Under the Freedom of
Information Act (FOIA) (5 U.S.C. 552), CBI is exempt from public
disclosure. If your comments responsive to this NPRM contain commercial
or financial information that is customarily treated as private, that
you actually treat as private, and that is relevant or responsive to
this NPRM, it is important that you clearly designate the submitted
comments as CBI. Please mark each page of your submission containing
CBI as ``PROPIN.'' The FAA will treat such marked submissions as
confidential under the FOIA, and they will not be placed in the public
docket of this NPRM. Submissions containing CBI should be sent to Dan
Rodina, Aerospace Engineer, Large Aircraft Section, International
Validation Branch, FAA, 2200 South 216th Street, Des Moines, WA 98198,
telephone and fax<PHONE_NUMBER>; email [email protected]. Any
commentary that the FAA receives which is not specifically designated
as CBI will be placed in the public docket for this rulemaking.

Background

    EASA, which is the Technical Agent for the Member States of the
European Union, has issued EASA AD 2022-0014, dated January 25, 2022
(EASA AD 2022-0014) (also referred to as the MCAI), to correct an
unsafe condition for all Airbus SAS Model A350-941 and -1041 airplanes.
    This proposed AD was prompted by a report indicating that the VSSF
of certain captain's, first officer's, and third occupant's seats could
fail. The FAA is proposing this AD to address failure of the VSSF,
which could lead to flight deck seat failure and unexpected seat
movement under certain loading conditions, possibly resulting in
flightcrew injury and reduced control of the airplane. See the MCAI for
additional background information.

Related Service Information Under 1 CFR Part 51

    EASA AD 2022-0014 specifies procedures for modifying or replacing
each affected captain's, first officer's, and third occupant's seat.
EASA AD 2022-0014 also limits the installation of affected seats under
certain conditions. This material is reasonably available because the
interested parties have access to it through their normal course of
business or by the means identified in the ADDRESSES section.

FAA's Determination

    This product has been approved by the aviation authority of another
country and is approved for operation in the United States. Pursuant to
the FAA's bilateral agreement with the State of Design Authority, it
has notified the FAA of the unsafe condition described in the MCAI
referenced above. The FAA is issuing this NPRM after determining that
the unsafe condition described previously is likely to exist or develop
in other products of the same type design.

Proposed AD Requirements in This NPRM

    This proposed AD would require accomplishing the actions specified
in EASA AD 2022-0014 described previously, except for any differences
identified as exceptions in the regulatory text of this proposed AD.

Explanation of Required Compliance Information

    In the FAA's ongoing efforts to improve the efficiency of the AD
process, the FAA developed a process to use some civil aviation
authority (CAA) ADs as the primary source of information for compliance
with requirements for corresponding FAA ADs. The FAA has been
coordinating this process with manufacturers and CAAs. As a result, the
FAA proposes to incorporate EASA AD 2022-0014 by reference in the FAA
final rule. This proposed AD would, therefore, require compliance with
EASA AD 2022-0014 in its entirety through that incorporation, except
for any differences identified as exceptions in the regulatory text of
this proposed AD. Using common terms that are the same as the heading
of a particular section in EASA AD 2022-0014 does not mean that
operators need comply only with that section. For example, where the AD
requirement refers to ``all required actions and compliance times,''
compliance with this AD requirement is not limited to the section
titled ``Required Action(s) and Compliance Time(s)'' in EASA AD 2022-
0014. Service information required by EASA AD 2022-0014 for compliance
will be available at https://www.regulations.gov by searching for and
locating Docket No. FAA-2022-0801 after the FAA final rule is
published.

Costs of Compliance

    The FAA estimates that this proposed AD would affect 27 airplanes
of U.S. registry. The FAA estimates the following costs to comply with
this proposed AD:

                                      Estimated Costs for Required Actions
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
                                                                                Cost per       Cost on U.S.
                          Labor cost                              Parts cost        product         operators
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Up to 23 work-hours x $85 per hour = $1,955..................             * $         * $1,955        * $52,785
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
* The FAA has received no definitive data regarding parts costs for the seat modification or replacement.

    According to the manufacturer, some or all of the costs of this
proposed AD may be covered under warranty, thereby reducing the cost
impact on affected individuals. The FAA does not control warranty
coverage for affected individuals. As a result, the FAA has included
all known costs in the cost estimate.

Authority for This Rulemaking

    Title 49 of the United States Code specifies the FAA's authority to
issue rules on aviation safety. Subtitle I, section 106, describes the
authority of the FAA Administrator. Subtitle VII: Aviation Programs,
describes in more detail the scope of the Agency's authority.
    The FAA is issuing this rulemaking under the authority described in
Subtitle VII, Part A, Subpart III, Section 44701: General requirements.
Under that section, Congress charges the FAA with promoting safe flight
of civil aircraft in air commerce by prescribing regulations for
practices, methods, and procedures the Administrator finds necessary
for safety in air commerce. This regulation is within the scope of that
authority because it addresses an unsafe condition that is likely to
exist or develop on products identified in this rulemaking action.

Regulatory Findings

    The FAA determined that this proposed AD would not have federalism
implications under Executive Order 13132. This proposed AD would not
have a substantial direct effect on the States, on the relationship
between the national Government and the States, or on the distribution
of power and responsibilities among the various levels of government.
    For the reasons discussed above, I certify this proposed
regulation:
    (1) Is not a ``significant regulatory action'' under Executive
Order 12866,
    (2) Would not affect intrastate aviation in Alaska, and
    (3) Would not have a significant economic impact, positive or
negative, on a substantial number of small entities under the criteria
of the Regulatory Flexibility Act.

List of Subjects in 14 CFR Part 39

    Air transportation, Aircraft, Aviation safety, Incorporation by
reference, Safety.

The Proposed Amendment

    Accordingly, under the authority delegated to me by the
Administrator, the FAA proposes to amend 14 CFR part 39 as follows:

PART 39--AIRWORTHINESS DIRECTIVES

0
1. The authority citation for part 39 continues to read as follows:

    Authority:  49 U.S.C. 106(g), 40113, 44701.

Sec.  39.13   [Amended]

0
2. The FAA amends Sec.  39.13 by adding the following new airworthiness
directive:

Airbus SAS: Docket No. FAA-2022-0801; Project Identifier MCAI-2022-
00092-T.

(a) Comments Due Date

    The FAA must receive comments on this airworthiness directive
(AD) by August 12, 2022.

(b) Affected ADs

    None.

(c) Applicability

    This AD applies to all Airbus SAS Model A350-941 and -1041
airplanes, certificated in any category.

(d) Subject

    Air Transport Association (ATA) of America Code 25, Equipment/
furnishings.

(e) Unsafe Condition

    This AD was prompted by a report indicating that the vertical
stop support fitting (VSSF) of certain captain's, first officer's,
and third occupant's seats could fail. The FAA is issuing this AD to
address failure of the VSSF, which could lead to flight deck seat
failure and unexpected seat movement under certain loading
conditions, possibly resulting in flightcrew injury and reduced
control of the airplane.

(f) Compliance

    Comply with this AD within the compliance times specified,
unless already done.

(g) Requirements

    Except as specified in paragraphs (h) and (i) of this AD: Comply
with all required actions and compliance times specified in, and in
accordance with, European Union Aviation Safety Agency (EASA) AD
2022-0014, dated January 25, 2022 (EASA AD 2022-0014).

(h) Exceptions to EASA AD 2022-0014

    (1) Where EASA AD 2022-0014 refers to its effective date, this
AD requires using the effective date of this AD.
    (2) The ``Remarks'' section of EASA AD 2022-0014 does not apply
to this AD.

(i) No Reporting Requirement

    Although the service information referenced in EASA AD 2022-0014
specifies to submit certain information to the manufacturer, this AD
does not include that requirement.

(j) Additional AD Provisions

    The following provisions also apply to this AD:
    (1) Alternative Methods of Compliance (AMOCs): The Manager,
Large Aircraft Section, International Validation Branch, FAA, has
the authority to approve AMOCs for this AD, if requested using the
procedures found in 14 CFR 39.19. In accordance with 14 CFR 39.19,
send your request to your principal inspector or responsible Flight
Standards Office, as appropriate. If sending information directly to
the Large Aircraft Section, International Validation Branch/manager
of the certification office, send it to the attention of the person
identified in paragraph (k)(2) of this AD. Information may be
emailed to: [email protected]. Before using any approved
AMOC, notify your appropriate principal inspector, or lacking a
principal inspector, the manager of the responsible Flight Standards
Office.
    (2) Contacting the Manufacturer: For any requirement in this AD
to obtain instructions from a manufacturer, the instructions must be
accomplished using a method approved by the Manager, Large Aircraft
Section, International Validation Branch, FAA; or EASA; or Airbus
SAS's EASA Design Organization Approval (DOA). If approved by the
DOA, the approval must include the DOA-authorized signature.
    (3) Required for Compliance (RC): Except as required by
paragraph (j)(2) of this AD, if any service information contains
procedures or tests that are identified as RC, those procedures and
tests must be done to comply with this AD; any procedures or tests
that are not identified as RC are recommended. Those procedures and
tests that are not identified as RC may be deviated from using
accepted methods in accordance with the operator's maintenance or
inspection program without obtaining approval of an AMOC, provided
the procedures and tests identified as RC can be done and the
airplane can be put back in an airworthy condition. Any
substitutions or changes to procedures or tests identified as RC
require approval of an AMOC.

(k) Related Information

    (1) For EASA AD 2022-0014, contact EASA, Konrad-Adenauer-Ufer 3,
50668 Cologne, Germany; telephone +49 221 8999 000; email
[email protected]; internet www.easa.europa.eu. You may find this
EASA AD on the EASA website at https://ad.easa.europa.eu. You may
view this material at the FAA, Airworthiness Products Section,
Operational Safety Branch, 2200 South 216th St., Des Moines, WA. For
information on the availability of this material at the FAA, call
206-231-3195. This material may be found in the AD docket at https://www.regulations.gov by searching for and locating Docket No. FAA-
2022-0801.
    (2) For more information about this AD, contact Dan Rodina,
Aerospace Engineer, Large Aircraft Section, International Validation
Branch, FAA, 2200 South 216th Street, Des Moines, WA 98198,
telephone and fax<PHONE_NUMBER>; email [email protected].

    Issued on June 22, 2022.
Christina Underwood,
Acting Director, Compliance & Airworthiness Division, Aircraft
Certification Service.
[FR Doc. 2022-13681 Filed 6-27-22; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910-13-P


[Federal Register Volume 78, Number 237 (Tuesday, December 10, 2013)]
[Notices]
[Pages 74126-74127]
[FR Doc No: 2013-29401]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission

Combined Notice of Filings 1

    Take notice that the Commission received the following electric
rate filings:

    Docket Numbers: ER11-3980-003; ER10-2294-004; ER11-3808-003; ER13-
534-003.
    Applicants: ORNI 18, LLC, ORNI 39, LLC, Mammoth One LLC, ORNI 14
LLC.
    Description: Notice of Non-Material Change-in-Status of the ORNI
Companies.
    Filed Date: 12/3/13.
    Accession Number: 20131203-5142.
    Comments Due: 5 p.m. ET 12/24/13.

    Docket Numbers: ER14-336-001.
    Applicants: Sunwave USA Holdings, Inc.
    Description: Sunwave USA Holdings, Inc. submits Amendment to MBR
Tariff Filing to be effective 12/1/2013.
    Filed Date: 12/3/13.
    Accession Number: 20131203-5046.
    Comments Due: 5 p.m. ET 12/24/13.

    Docket Numbers: ER14-509-000.
    Applicants: PJM Interconnection, L.L.C.
    Description: PJM Interconnection, L.L.C. submits Queue Position
T77; Original Service Agreement No. 3669 to be effective 10/31/2013.
    Filed Date: 12/2/13.
    Accession Number: 20131202-5190.
    Comments Due: 5 p.m. ET 12/23/13.

    Docket Numbers: ER14-510-000.
    Applicants: ISO New England Inc., New England Power Pool
Participants Committee.
    Description: ISO New England Inc. and New England Power Pool
Participants Committee submit Installed Capacity Requirement, Hydro
Quebec Interconnection Capability Credits and Related Values for the
2014/2015, 2015/2016 and 2016/2017.
    Filed Date: 12/3/13.
    Accession Number: 20131203-5052.
    Comments Due: 5 p.m. ET 12/24/13.

    Docket Numbers: ER14-511-000.
    Applicants: GenOn Energy Management, LLC.
    Description: GenOn Energy Management, LLC submits Compliance Filing
to MBR Tariff to be effective 12/4/2013.
    Filed Date: 12/3/13.
    Accession Number: 20131203-5055.
    Comments Due: 5 p.m. ET 12/24/13.

    Docket Numbers: ER14-512-000.
    Applicants: NRG Power Marketing LLC.
    Description: NRG Power Marketing LLC submits tariff filing per 35:

Compliance Filing for MBR Tariff to be effective 12/4/2013.
    Filed Date: 12/3/13.
    Accession Number: 20131203-5065.
    Comments Due: 5 p.m. ET 12/24/13

    Docket Numbers: ER14-513-000.
    Applicants: NRG Solar Avra Valley LLC.
    Description: NRG Solar Avra Valley LLC submits Compliance Filing
for MBR Tariff to be effective 12/4/2013.
    Filed Date: 12/3/13.
    Accession Number: 20131203-5067.
    Comments Due: 5 p.m. ET 12/24/13.

    Docket Numbers: ER14-514-000.
    Applicants: NRG Solar Borrego I LLC.
    Description: NRG Solar Borrego I LLC submits Compliance Filing for
MBR Tariff to be effective 12/4/2013.
    Filed Date: 12/3/13.
    Accession Number: 20131203-5068.
    Comments Due: 5 p.m. ET 12/24/13.

    Docket Numbers: ER14-515-000.
    Applicants: NRG Solar Roadrunner LLC.
    Description: NRG Solar Roadrunner LLC submits Compliance Filing for
MBR Tariff to be effective 12/4/2013.
    Filed Date: 12/3/13.
    Accession Number: 20131203-5069.
    Comments Due: 5 p.m. ET 12/24/13.

    Docket Numbers: ER14-516-000.
    Applicants: Midcontinent Independent System Operator, Inc.
    Description: Midcontinent Independent System Operator, Inc. submits
12-02-2013 SA 2606 OTP-CPEC T-L L13-02 Benedict to be effective 12/4/
2013.
    Filed Date: 12/3/13.
    Accession Number: 20131203-5081.
    Comments Due: 5 p.m. ET 12/24/13.

    Take notice that the Commission received the following electric
securities filings:

    Docket Numbers: ES14-3-000; ES14-9-000.
    Applicants: FirstEnergy Service Company.
    Description: Supplemental Filing and Request for 10-Day Comment
Period of FirstEnergy Service Company.
    Filed Date: 12/2/13.
    Accession Number: 20131202-5201.
    Comments Due: 5 p.m. ET 12/12/13.

    Take notice that the Commission received the following electric
reliability filings:

    Docket Numbers: RR13-3-001.
    Applicants: North American Electric Reliability Corporation.
    Description: Compliance Filing of the North American Electric
Reliability Corporation in Response to Order Approving Amendments to
the Rules of Procedure Appendix 4D.
    Filed Date: 12/2/13.
    Accession Number: 20131202-5161.
    Comments Due: 5 p.m. ET 12/23/13.

    The filings are accessible in the Commission's eLibrary system by
clicking on the links or querying the docket number.
    Any person desiring to intervene or protest in any of the above
proceedings must file in accordance with Rules 211 and 214 of the
Commission's Regulations (18 CFR 385.211 and 385.214) on or before 5:00
p.m. Eastern time on the specified comment date. Protests may be
considered, but intervention is necessary to become a party to the
proceeding.
    eFiling is encouraged. More detailed information relating to filing
requirements, interventions, protests, service, and qualifying
facilities filings can be found at: http://www.ferc.gov/docs-filing/efiling/filing-req.pdf. For other information, call<PHONE_NUMBER>
(toll free). For TTY, call<PHONE_NUMBER>.

    Dated: December 3, 2013.
Nathaniel J. Davis, Sr.,
Deputy Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2013-29401 Filed 12-9-13; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6717-01-P


[Federal Register Volume 81, Number 18 (Thursday, January 28, 2016)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Pages 4886-4889]
[FR Doc No: 2016-01660]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY

40 CFR Part 52

[EPA-R07-OAR-2015-0644; FRL-9941-68-Region 7]

Approval of Missouri's Air Quality Implementation Plans;
Americold Logistics, LLC 24-Hour Particulate Matter (PM10) National
Ambient Air Quality Standard (NAAQS) Consent Judgment

AGENCY: Environmental Protection Agency.

ACTION: Direct final rule.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) is taking direct
final action to approve a revision to the State Implementation Plan
(SIP) submitted by the State of Missouri on June 2, 2014. This SIP
revision incorporates a consent judgment to address violations of the
24-hour particulate matter (PM10) NAAQS near the Americold
Logistics, LLC, Carthage Crushed Limestone (CCL) facility near
Carthage, Missouri. CCL is a limestone quarry operation. The consent
judgment between the State of Missouri and CCL includes measures that
will control PM10 emissions from the facility. This approval
will make the consent judgment Federally-enforceable.

DATES: This direct final rule will be effective March 28, 2016, without
further notice, unless EPA receives adverse comment by February 29,
2016. If EPA receives adverse comment, we will publish a timely
withdrawal of the direct final rule in the Federal Register informing
the public that the rule will not take effect.

ADDRESSES: Submit your comments, identified by Docket ID No. EPA-R07-
OAR-2015-0644, to www.regulations.gov. Follow the online instructions
for submitting comments. Once submitted, comments cannot be edited or
removed from Regulations.gov. EPA may publish any comment received to
its public docket. Do not submit electronically any information you
consider to be Confidential Business Information (CBI) or other
information whose disclosure is restricted by statute. Multimedia
submissions (audio, video, etc.) must be accompanied by a written
comment. The written comment is considered the official comment and
should include discussion of all points you wish to make. EPA will
generally not consider comments or comment contents located outside of
the primary submission (i.e. on the web, cloud, or other file sharing
system). For additional submission methods, the full EPA public comment
policy, information about CBI or multimedia submissions, and general
guidance on making effective comments, please visit http://www2.epa.gov/dockets/commenting-epa-dockets.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Heather Hamilton, Environmental
Protection Agency, Air Planning and Development Branch, 11201 Renner
Boulevard, Lenexa, Kansas 66219 at<PHONE_NUMBER> or by email at
<EMAIL_ADDRESS>
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Throughout this document ``we,'' ``us,'' or
``our'' refer to EPA. This section provides additional information by
addressing the following:

I. Background
II. What is being addressed in this document?
III. Have the requirements for approval of a SIP revision been met?
IV. What action is EPA taking?
V. Incorporation by Reference
VI. Statutory and Executive Order Reviews

I. Background

    EPA's current health-based PM10 NAAQS was set in 1987 at
a level of 150 [micro]g/m\3\ measured over 24 hours. 40 CFR 50.6(a). An
exceedance of the NAAQS is a daily (24-hour average) PM10
concentration that is above the level of the standard. A violation of
the NAAQS occurs when an exceedance occurs more than once per year on
average over three years. 40 CFR part 50, appendix K.
    Exceedances and violations of the PM10 NAAQS at the
Carthage monitor date back to 2001. In October 2003, the Missouri
Department of Natural Resources (MDNR) Air Pollution Control Program
and Americold Logistics, LLC, Carthage Crushed Limestone (CCL) entered
into a settlement agreement that contained measures for reducing CCL's
fugitive particulate matter emissions for exceedances of the
PM10 NAAQS. The measures put in place from the settlement
agreement reduced the number of PM10 exceedances at the
Carthage monitor for several years.
    There were no exceedances in 2009 and 2010; however, based on
validated air quality data from 2011 to 2013, the Carthage monitor
again experienced a number of exceedances as evidenced in the following
table:

Carthage PM10 Air Quality System Data Validity and Certification Through
                              June 30, 2013
------------------------------------------------------------------------
                                                           24-Hour PM10
                                                            exceedance
                          Date                              ([micro]g/
                                                               m\3\)
------------------------------------------------------------------------
June 23, 2011...........................................             174
September 9, 2011.......................................             159
September 26, 2011......................................             258
November 30, 2011.......................................             192
January 16, 2012........................................             222
------------------------------------------------------------------------

    After an internal analysis to identify potential sources of
emissions for the exceedances, the MDNR Air Pollution Control Program
contacted CCL regarding their operations at the facility. On June 8,
2012, CCL proposed additional control measures that were necessary due
to malfunctioning equipment and processing issues at the facility.

II. What is being addressed in this document?

    EPA is taking direct final action to approve a revision to the SIP
submitted by the State of Missouri on June 2, 2014. Missouri requested
that EPA approve Americold Logistics, LLC, Carthage Crushed Limestone
(CCL) consent judgment for inclusion into the Missouri SIP. The consent
judgment between the state of Missouri and CCL was entered on May 3,
2014, and effective May 13, 2014. The consent judgment requires CCL to
apply specific measures and work practices to reduce PM10
emissions generated at the facility. These measures and practices were
required to be operational by March 31, 2014. CCL has implemented and
made operational these measures in accordance with the consent judgment
timelines.
    As a result, CCL worked cooperatively with MDNR who developed an
enforceable consent judgment for implementing controls to further
reduce PM10 emissions at the facility. CCL proactively put
several controls in place during 2012 and 2013 prior to finalization of
the consent judgment.
    Control measures to reduce fugitive PM10 emissions in
the 2014 consent judgment include the following: (1) Installation of
wet suppression for crushers; (2) eliminate screen and install a hopper
to reduce free fall of rock; (3) install a CFM compressor for the
baghouse controlling the Cedar Rapids dryer; (4) design and install a
new drop point/transition to improve seal at conveyor transfer points;
(5) install a new bin top in the west lime hopper; (6) fabricate a new
transition on elevator head where it drops on to tail of the line to
the conveyor belt, and install a new head house and boot that seals to
the elevator; (7) rebuild a water truck to contain eight thousand
gallons of water for haul roads; (8) enclose the bed of the haul truck
that hauls waste fines to stock pile area; (9) develop an operation and
maintenance plan for MDNR approval, and, (10) submit a full emissions
inventory questionnaire for the calendar year 2012. The aforementioned
control measures were completed according to schedule.
    The consent judgment also includes contingency measures in the
event of an exceedance of the PM10 NAAQS. Contingency
measures include investigating and addressing any exceedance to the
extent possible in a timely manner including a detailed report to the
MDNR Air Pollution Control Program within ten days. Additional
contingency measures outlined in the consent judgment are to be
reported no later than ninety days after the calendar quarter in which
the monitoring data was measured.
    In addition to the measures outlined in the consent judgment, CCL
has voluntarily agreed to participate in a near-real-time
PM10 concentration alarm notification system for monitored
hourly PM10 levels that exceed the 150 [micro]g/m\3\. This
activity is strictly voluntary and the MDNR Air Pollution Control
Program is not submitting requirements for CCL to participate in the
alarm notification for inclusion in this SIP action.
    Since entering into the consent judgment with the MDNR, there was
one exceedance of the PM10 standard on December 8, 2014.
There have been no other exceedances recorded since that date. CCL, in
accordance with the consent judgment contingency measures, notified the
MDNR Air Pollution Control Program about the exceedance. The MDNR Air
Pollution Control Program continues to monitor air quality and to work
with the facility as necessary to implement the contingency measures of
the consent judgment through a corrective action plan that addresses
the 2014 exceedance.
    The control and contingency measures identified in the consent
judgment, and included in MDNR's SIP revision request, is a significant
strengthening of the current requirements applicable to this source to
control fugitive PM emissions. EPA believes that these requirements
will reduce or potentially eliminate future exceedances of the
PM10 NAAQS and lead to improvements in the air quality in
the area surrounding CCL's facility. The work practice revisions and
mechanical upgrades along with the contingency measures put into action
by the consent judgment and this SIP revision provide for permanent
modifications that deal with past and future exceedances in a manner
that limits their potential and represent an effective short term and
long term control strategy for fugitive emissions of coarse particulate
matter.

III. Have the requirements for approval of a SIP revision been met?

    The June 2, 2014, submission has met the public notice requirements
for SIP submissions in accordance with 40 CFR 51.102. The submission
also satisfied the completeness criteria of 40 CFR part 51, appendix V.
In addition, the revision meets the substantive SIP requirements of the
CAA, including section 110 and implementing regulations.

IV. What action is EPA taking?

    EPA is taking direct final action to approve this SIP revision. We
are publishing this rule without a prior proposed rule because we view
this as a noncontroversial action and anticipate no adverse comment.
However, in the ``Proposed Rules'' section of this Federal Register, we
are publishing a separate document that will serve as the proposed rule
to approve this SIP revision, if adverse comments are

received on this direct final rule. We will not institute a second
comment period on this action. Any parties interested in commenting
must do so at this time. For further information about commenting on
this rule, see the ADDRESSES section of this document. If EPA receives
adverse comment, we will publish a timely withdrawal in the Federal
Register informing the public that this direct final rule will not take
effect. We will address all public comments in any subsequent final
rule based on the proposed rule.

V. Incorporation by Reference

    In this rule, EPA is finalizing regulatory text that includes
incorporation by reference. In accordance with requirements of 1 CFR
51.5, EPA is finalizing the incorporation by reference of the Missouri
Source Specific Permits and Orders described in the direct final
amendments to 40 CFR part 52 set forth below. EPA has made, and will
continue to make, these documents generally available electronically
through www.regulations.gov and at the appropriate EPA office (see the
ADDRESSES section of this preamble for more information).

VI. Statutory and Executive Order Reviews

    Under the CAA, the Administrator is required to approve a SIP
submission that complies with the provisions of the Act and applicable
Federal regulations. 42 U.S.C. 7410(k); 40 CFR 52.02(a). Thus, in
reviewing SIP submissions, EPA's role is to approve state choices,
provided that they meet the criteria of the CAA. Accordingly, this
action merely approves state law as meeting Federal requirements and
does not impose additional requirements beyond those imposed by state
law. For that reason, this action:
     Is not a significant regulatory action subject to review
by the Office of Management and Budget under Executive Orders 12866 (58
FR 51735, October 4, 1993) and 13563 (76 FR 3821, January 21, 2011);
     Does not impose an information collection burden under the
provisions of the Paperwork Reduction Act (44 U.S.C. 3501 et seq.);
     Is certified as not having a significant economic impact
on a substantial number of small entities under the Regulatory
Flexibility Act (5 U.S.C. 601 et seq.);
     Does not contain any unfunded mandate or significantly or
uniquely affect small governments, as described in the Unfunded
Mandates Reform Act of 1995 (Pub. L. 104-4);
     Does not have Federalism implications as specified in
Executive Order 13132 (64 FR 43255, August 10, 1999);
     Is not an economically significant regulatory action based
on health or safety risks subject to Executive Order 13045 (62 FR
19885, April 23, 1997);
     Is not a significant regulatory action subject to
Executive Order 13211 (66 FR 28355, May 22, 2001);
     Is not subject to requirements of section 12(d) of the
National Technology Transfer and Advancement Act of 1995 (15 U.S.C. 272
note) because application of those requirements would be inconsistent
with the CAA; and
     Does not provide EPA with the discretionary authority to
address, as appropriate, disproportionate human health or environmental
effects, using practicable and legally permissible methods, under
Executive Order 12898 (59 FR 7629, February 16, 1994).
    The SIP is not approved to apply on any Indian reservation land or
in any other area where EPA or an Indian tribe has demonstrated that a
tribe has jurisdiction. In those areas of Indian country, the rule does
not have tribal implications and will not impose substantial direct
costs on tribal governments or preempt tribal law as specified by
Executive Order 13175 (65 FR 67249, November 9, 2000).
    The Congressional Review Act, 5 U.S.C. 801 et seq., as added by the
Small Business Regulatory Enforcement Fairness Act of 1996, generally
provides that before a rule may take effect, the agency promulgating
the rule must submit a rule report, which includes a copy of the rule,
to each House of the Congress and to the Comptroller General of the
United States. EPA will submit a report containing this action and
other required information to the U.S. Senate, the U.S. House of
Representatives, and the Comptroller General of the United States prior
to publication of the rule in the Federal Register. A major rule cannot
take effect until 60 days after it is published in the Federal
Register. This action is not a ``major rule'' as defined by 5 U.S.C.
804(2).
    Under section 307(b)(1) of the CAA, petitions for judicial review
of this action must be filed in the United States Court of Appeals for
the appropriate circuit by March 28, 2016. Filing a petition for
reconsideration by the Administrator of this final rule does not affect
the finality of this action for the purposes of judicial review nor
does it extend the time within which a petition for judicial review may
be filed, and shall not postpone the effectiveness of such rule or
action. This action may not be challenged later in proceedings to
enforce its requirements. (See section 307(b)(2)).

List of Subjects in 40 CFR Part 52

    Environmental protection, Air pollution control, Carbon monoxide,
Incorporation by reference, Intergovernmental relations, Nitrogen
dioxide, Particulate matter, Reporting and recordkeeping requirements,
Sulfur oxides.

    Dated: January 11, 2016.
Mark Hague,
Regional Administrator, Region 7.

    For the reasons stated in the preamble, EPA amends 40 CFR part 52
as set forth below:

PART 52--APPROVAL AND PROMULGATION OF IMPLEMENTATION PLANS

0
1. The authority citation for part 52 continues to read as follows:

    Authority:  42 U.S.C. 7401 et seq.

Subpart AA--Missouri

0
2. Section 52.1320(d) is amended by adding entry (30) at the end of the
table to read as follows:

Sec.  52.1320  Identification of plan.

* * * * *
    (d) * * *

                            EPA-Approved Missouri Source-Specific Permits and Orders
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
                                                                State
          Name of source               Order/Permit No.    effective date    EPA Approval date      Explanation
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

                                                  * * * * * * *
(30) Americold Logistics, LLC 24-   Consent Judgment 14AP-        4/27/14  1/28/16, [insert       ..............
 Hour Particulate Matter (PM10)      CC00036.                               Federal Register
 National Ambient Air Quality                                               citation].
 (NAAQS) Consent Judgment.
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

[FR Doc. 2016-01660 Filed 1-27-16; 8:45 am]
 BILLING CODE 6560-50-P


[Federal Register Volume 82, Number 216 (Thursday, November 9, 2017)]
[Notices]
[Page 52044]
[FR Doc No: 2017-24427]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY

[FRL-9969-84-OW]

Clean Water Act; Contractor Access to Confidential Business
Information

AGENCY: Environmental Protection Agency (EPA).

ACTION: Notice of intended transfer of Confidential Business
Information to contractor and its subcontractors.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) intends to transfer
confidential business information (CBI) collected from numerous
industries under a newly awarded contract to Eastern Research Group
(ERG) and its subcontractors. Transfer of this information is necessary
for ERG to assist the Office of Water in the preparation of effluent
guidelines and standards and with its effluent guidelines planning and
review activities. Much of the information being transferred was or
will be collected under the authority of section 308 of the Clean Water
Act (CWA). Interested persons may submit comments on this intended
transfer of information to the address noted below.

DATES: Comments on the transfer of data are due November 14, 2017.

ADDRESSES: Comments may be sent to M. Ahmar Siddiqui, Document Control
Officer, Engineering and Analysis Division (4303T), U.S. EPA, 1200
Pennsylvania Ave. NW., Washington, DC 20460.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:  M. Ahmar Siddiqui, Document Control
Officer, at<PHONE_NUMBER>, or via email at [email protected].

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: EPA has transferred CBI to various
contractors and subcontractors over the history of the effluent
guidelines program under 40 CFR 2.302(h). EPA determined that this
transfer was necessary to enable the contractors and subcontractors to
perform their work in supporting EPA in planning, developing, and
reviewing effluent guidelines and standards for certain industries.
    Today, pursuant to 40 CFR 2.302(h)(2), EPA is giving notice that it
has entered into a new contract with ERG, contract number EP-C-17-041,
located in Chantilly, Virginia. The purpose of this contract is to
secure technical and engineering analysis support for EPA in its
development, review, implementation, and defense of water-related
initiatives for a variety of industries. To obtain assistance in
responding to this contract, ERG has entered into contracts with the
following subcontractors and consultant: PG Environmental, LLC (located
in Chantilly, Virginia and Golden, Colorado), Great Lakes Environmental
Center (located in Traverse City, Michigan and Columbus, Ohio),
LimnoTech (located in Ann Arbor, Michigan), Mabbett & Associates, Inc.
(located in Bedford, Massachusetts), RESPEC Consulting and Services
(located in Mountain View, California), The Water Planet Company
(located in New London, Connecticut), and Jack Martin (located in
Georgetown, Delaware).
    All EPA contractor, subcontractor, and consultant personnel are
bound by the requirements and sanctions contained in their contracts
with EPA and in EPA's confidentiality regulations found at 40 CFR part
2, subpart B. ERG will adhere to an EPA-approved security plan which
describes procedures to protect CBI. ERG will apply the procedures in
this plan to CBI previously gathered by EPA and to CBI that may be
gathered in the future. The security plan specifies that contractor
personnel are required to sign non-disclosure agreements and are
briefed on appropriate security procedures before they are permitted
access to CBI. No person is automatically granted access to CBI: A need
to know must exist.
    The information that will be transferred to ERG consists of
information previously collected by EPA to support the development and
review of effluent limitations guidelines and standards under the CWA
and that EPA had transferred to ERG under a previous contract with
them. In particular, information, including CBI, collected for the
planning, development, and review of effluent limitations guidelines
and standards for the following industries may be transferred to ERG
under the new contract: Airport deicing; aquaculture; centralized waste
treatment; coal bed methane; concentrated animal feeding operations;
coal mining; construction and development; drinking water treatment;
industrial container and drum cleaning; industrial laundries;
industrial waste combustors; iron and steel manufacturing; landfills;
meat and poultry products; metal finishing; metal products and
machinery; nonferrous metals manufacturing; oil and gas extraction
(including coalbed methane); ore mining and dressing; organic
chemicals, plastics, and synthetic fibers; pesticide chemicals;
petroleum refining; pharmaceutical manufacturing; pulp, paper, and
paperboard manufacturing; shale gas extraction; steam electric power
generation; textile mills; timber products processing; tobacco;
transportation equipment cleaning; and other industrial categories that
EPA has reviewed as part of its CWA required annual review activities.
    EPA also intends to transfer to ERG all information listed in this
notice, of the type described above (including CBI) that may be
collected in the future under the authority of section 308 of the CWA
or voluntarily submitted (e.g., in comments in response to a Federal
Register notice), as is necessary to enable ERG to carry out the work
required by its contract to support EPA's effluent guidelines planning
and review process and the development of effluent limitations
guidelines and standards.

    Dated: November 3, 2017.
Deborah G. Nagle,
Acting Director, Office of Science and Technology, Office of Water.
[FR Doc. 2017-24427 Filed 11-8-17; 8:45 am]
 BILLING CODE 6560-50-P


Table 1  Nationwide Industry Burden for Major Sources A B C D E F Bruden Item Person hours Annual occurrenceAnnual person hours Total number Technical hours Management hour per occurrence per respondent per respondent of respondents per year per year ( A X B) ( C X D) ( E x 0.05)

1. Applications N/ A 2. Surveys and Studies N/ A 3. Reporting requirements a. Read rule and instructions 1 1 1 1 1 0.1 b. Required Activities i. Initial Performance Test  Process Vents 480 1 480 1 480 24.0 ii. Initial Performance Test  Wastewater 160 1 160 1 160 8.0 c. Write Reports i. Notification of Applicability 2 1 2 1 2 0.1 ii. Notification of Construction/ Reconstructio 2 1 2 1 2 0.1 iii. Notification of Actual Startup 2 1 2 1 2 0.1 iv. Initial notification 14 1 14 1 14 0.7 v. Performance test notification 2 1 2 1 2 0.1 vi. Compliance status notification 2 1 2 1 2 0.1 vii. Performance test reports 80 1 80 1 80 4.0 viii. Startup/ shutdown/ malfunction reports 2 1 2 1 2 0.1 ix. Semi annual summary report 20 2 40 82 3,280 164 x. Notification of Physical/ operational change 2 1 2 8 16 0.8 Total Nubmer of Responses 180 2. Recordkeeping requirements a. Read rule and instructions Included in 3. a. above b. Develop Record System 40 1 40 1 40 2 c. Time to train personnel 40 1 40 1 40 2 d. Continuously Monitored parameter Included in 3. c. above e. LDAR Program 88 1 88 82 7,216 361 f. SS& M Plan 2 1 2 1 2 0.1 Total 11,341 567 Total Burden Ho G H Clerical hours Total Annual per year Cost ( E x 0.10) 0.1 $ 92 48.0 $ 44,057 16.0 $ 14,686 0.2 $ 184 0.2 $ 184 0.2 $ 184 1.4 $ 1,285 0.2 $ 184 0.2 $ 184 8.0 $ 7,343 0.2 $ 184 328 $ 301,056 1.6 $ 1,469 4 $ 3,671 4 $ 3,671 722 $ 662,324 0.2 $ 184 1,134 $ 1,040,942 13,042


[Federal Register Volume 78, Number 28 (Monday, February 11, 2013)]
[Notices]
[Pages 9756-9758]
[FR Doc No: 2013-02923]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

[Release No. 34-68824; File No. SR-NSX-2013-03]

Self-Regulatory Organizations; National Stock Exchange, Inc.;
Notice of Filing and Immediate Effectiveness of Proposed Rule Change To
Amend Its Fee and Rebate Schedule

February 4, 2013.
    Pursuant to Section 19(b)(1) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934
(the ``Act'' or ``Exchange Act'') \1\ and Rule 19b-4 thereunder,\2\
notice is hereby given that on January 25, 2013, National Stock
Exchange, Inc. (``NSX[supreg]'' or ``Exchange'') filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission (``SEC'' or ``Commission'') the
proposed rule change, as described in Items I, II, and III below, which
Items have been prepared by the Exchange. The Commission is publishing
this notice to solicit comment on the proposed rule change from
interested persons.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \1\ 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(1).
    \2\ 17 CFR 240.19b-4.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

I. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement of the Terms of Substance
of the Proposed Rule Change

    The Exchange is proposing to amend its Fee and Rebate Schedule (the
``Fee Schedule'') issued pursuant to Exchange Rule 16.1(a) to: (1) Make
a clarifying change to Section I; and (2) amend Section III to provide
a rebate of $0.0013 per share to Equity Trading Permit (``ETP'')
Holders \3\ for Double Play Orders \4\ that are executed at or above
$1.00 on an away Trading Center.\5\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \3\ NSX Rule 1.5 defines the term ``ETP'' as an Equity Trading
Permit issued by the Exchange for effecting approved securities
transactions on the Exchange's Trading Facilities.
    \4\ NSX Rule 11.11(c)(10).
    \5\ NSX Rule 2.11. A Trading Center is defined as ``other
securities exchanges, facilities of securities exchanges, automated
trading systems, electronic communication networks or other brokers
or dealers.''
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    The text of the proposed rule change is available on the Exchange's
Web site at www.nsx.com, at the Exchange's principal office, and at the
Commission's public reference room.

II. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement of the Purpose of, and
Statutory Basis for, the Proposed Rule Change

    In its filing with the Commission, the Exchange included statements
concerning the purpose of, and basis for, the proposed rule change and
discussed any comments it received on the proposed rule change. The
text of these statements may be examined at the

places specified in Item IV below. The Exchange has prepared summaries,
set forth in sections A, B, and C below, of the most significant parts
of such statements.

A. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement of the Purpose of, and
Statutory Basis for, the Proposed Rule Change

1. Purpose
    The Exchange proposes to amend Section I of its Fee Schedule to:
(1) Make a clarifying change to Section I of the Fee Schedule; and (2)
amend Section III of the Fee Schedule to provide a rebate of $0.0013
per share to ETP Holders for Double Play Orders that are executed at or
above $1.00 on an away Trading Center.
Clarifying Change
    Under Section I of the Fee Schedule, the Exchange currently charges
ETP Holders that do not execute at least 50,000 shares of added
liquidity in a month a per share fee of $0.0030 for any marketable
order that removes liquidity in the Exchange's automatic execution mode
of interaction (``Auto-Ex Mode'').\6\ ETP Holders that execute more
than 50,000 shares of added liquidity per month in Auto-Ex Mode are
eligible for fees and rebates under either the Variable or Fixed Fee
Schedules under Section I. Endnote number three (3) in the Fee Schedule
currently states that ``Fixed Fee Schedule'' will apply to each ETP
Holder unless the ETP Holder elects to adopt the ``Variable Fee
Schedule'' by sending an email indicating this preference to
<EMAIL_ADDRESS>prior to 4:00 p.m. EST on the first trading day of
the calendar month. Rather than including this option in an endnote,
the Exchange proposes to move this endnote to Section I so that ETP
Holders are more easily made aware of this alternative and how to elect
the ``Variable Fee Schedule.'' The Exchange also proposes to modify
that language under Section I to explicitly state that ETP Holders that
execute at least 50,000 shares of added liquidity per month would be
subject to the ``Fixed Fee Schedule,'' unless they elected the
``Variable Fee Schedule'' and notified the Exchange as described above.
The Exchange simply proposes to clarify the existing volume eligibility
requirements and does not propose any changes to those standards.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \6\ Under Auto-Ex Mode the Exchange matches and executes like-
priced orders in accordance with the process described in NSX Rule
11.13(b)(1).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

Double Play Order Rebate
    The Exchange also proposes to provide ETP Holders a rebate of
$0.0013 per share for Double Play Orders that are executed at or above
$1.00 on an away Trading Center. The Double Play Order is a market or
limit order that instructs the System \7\ to route the order to a
specified away Trading Center(s) as approved by the Exchange from time
to time.\8\ The order will not be exposed to the NSX Book \9\ before
being routed to a specified destination or destinations. An order that
is not executed in full after routing away would return to the
Exchange, receive a new timestamp, and be processed in the manner
described in NSX Rule 11.14.(a).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \7\ Under NSX Rule 1.5, the term ``System'' is defined as ``the
electronic communications and trading facility * * * through which
orders of [ETP Holders] are consolidated for ranking and
execution.''
    \8\ NSX Rule 11.11(c)(10).
    \9\ Under NSX Rule 1.5, the term ``NSX Book'' is defined as
``the System's electronic file of orders.''
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    Under Section III of the Fee Schedule, the Exchange charges ETP
Holders for orders that are routed away and executed on another Trading
Center a per share fee of $0.0030 for securities priced at or above
$1.00 or 0.30% of the order's notional value for securities priced
below $1.00. Instead of the existing fee for routed orders, the
Exchange now proposes to provide ETP Holders a rebate of $0.0013 per
share for Double Play Orders that are priced at or above $1.00 and
executed on an away Trading Center. Any portion of a Double Play Order
that is not executed in full after routing away and returned to the
Exchange will not be eligible for the proposed rebate. The unexecuted
portion of the Double Play order is, instead, subject to the existing
fee structure under Schedules I of the Fee Schedule or the current fee
of $0.0030 per share under Section III of the Fee Schedule if
subsequently routed to an away Trading Center in accordance with
Exchange Rule 11.15(a)(ii) after exhausting all eligible orders resting
on the NSX Book and not as part of the original Double Play Order
instructions. The Exchange does not propose to amend the fee for
securities priced below $1.00.
    The Exchange believes the proposed rebate will increase liquidity
by encouraging ETP Holders to use Double Play Orders since this order
type provides an additional way to access liquidity on other market
centers. Increased use of the Double Play Order should also increase
liquidity at the Exchange since any unexecuted portion is returned to
the NSX Book.
Operative Date and Notice
    The Exchange will make the proposed modifications, which are
effective on filing of this proposed rule, operative as of commencement
of trading on February 1, 2013. Pursuant to Exchange Rule 16.1(c), the
Exchange will ``provide ETP Holders with notice of all relevant dues,
fees, assessments and charges of the Exchange'' through the issuance of
an Information Circular of the changes to the Fee Schedule and will
post a copy of the rule filing on the Exchange's Web site
(www.nsx.com).
2. Statutory Basis
    The Exchange believes that the proposed rebate for Double Play
Orders routed away and executed on another Trading Center is consistent
with the provisions of Section 6(b) of the Securities Exchange Act of
1934 \10\ (the ``Act''), in general, and Section 6(b)(4) of the
Act,\11\ in particular, in that it is reasonable and equitably
allocated amongst ETP Holders because all ETP Holders are eligible to
submit (or not submit) these types of orders, and may do so at their
discretion during the course of the month. The Exchange notes that ETP
Holders using the Double Play Order will receive a rebate rather than
being charged the Exchange's standard fees for orders routed away to
other Trading Centers. The rebate for Double Play Orders is a
reasonable method to increase liquidity by encouraging ETP Holders to
use Double Play Orders since this order type provides an additional way
to access liquidity on other market centers. Increased use of the
Double Play Order should also increase liquidity at the Exchange since
any unexecuted portion is returned to the NSX Book. Furthermore, the
Exchange believes that the proposed rebate for Double Play Orders is
consistent with the provisions of Section 6(b)(5) of the Act,\12\
because it is not unfairly discriminatory amongst ETP Holders. As
stated above, ETP Holders are eligible to submit (or not submit) these
types of orders, and may do so at their discretion during the course of
the month.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \10\ 15 U.S.C. 78f(b).
    \11\ 15 U.S.C. 78f(b)(4).
    \12\ 15 U.S.C. 78f(b)(5).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    Lastly, the Exchange believes that the proposed clarifications to
Section I of the Fee Schedule are consistent with the provisions of
Section 6(b) of the Act,\13\ in general, and Section 6(b)(4) of the
Act,\14\ in particular, in that is reasonable because these changes
clarify to ETP Holder what the eligibility requirements

are for receiving the Fixed Fee Schedule and how to notify the Exchange
if they chose to elect the Variable Fee Schedule under Section I. The
Exchange does not propose to change the existing eligibility volume
requirements.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \13\ 15 U.S.C. 78f(b).
    \14\ 15 U.S.C. 78f(b)(4).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    Finally, the Exchange notes that it operates in a highly
competitive market in which market participants can readily favor
competing venues. In such an environment, the Exchange must continually
review, and consider adjusting, its fees and rebates to remain
competitive with other exchanges. For the reasons described above, the
Exchange believes that the proposed rule change reflects this
competitive environment.

B. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement on Burden on Competition

    The Exchange does not believe that the proposed rule change will
impose any burden on competition that is not necessary or appropriate
in furtherance of the purposes of the Act. ETP Holders using the Double
Play Order will receive a rebate rather than being charged the
Exchange's standard fees for orders routed away to other Trading
Centers. The rebate is designed to increase liquidity by encouraging
ETP Holders to use Double Play Orders which should also increase
liquidity at the Exchange since any unexecuted portion is returned to
the NSX Book. As stated above, the Exchange operates in a highly
competitive market in which market participants can readily favor
competing venues. In such an environment, the Exchange must continually
review, and consider adjusting, its fees and rebates to remain
competitive with other exchanges.

C. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement on Comments on the Proposed
Rule Change Received From Members, Participants, or Others

    The Exchange has neither solicited nor received written comments on
the proposed rule change.

III. Date of Effectiveness of the Proposed Rule Change and Timing for
Commission Action

    The proposed rule change has taken effect upon filing pursuant to
Section 19(b)(3)(A)(ii) of the Exchange Act \15\ and subparagraph
(f)(2) of Rule 19b-4.\16\ At any time within 60 days of the filing of
such proposed rule change, the Commission summarily may temporarily
suspend such rule change if it appears to the Commission that such
action is necessary or appropriate in the public interest, for the
protection of investors, or otherwise in furtherance of the purposes of
the Act.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \15\ 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(3)(A)(ii).
    \16\ 17 CFR 240.19b-4.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

IV. Solicitation of Comments

    Interested persons are invited to submit written data, views, and
arguments concerning the foregoing, including whether the proposed rule
change is consistent with the Act. Comments may be submitted by any of
the following methods:

Electronic Comments

     Use the Commission's Internet comment form (http://www.sec.gov/rules/sro.shtml); or
     Send an email to<EMAIL_ADDRESS>Please include
File Number SR-NSX-2013-03 on the subject line.

Paper Comments

     Send paper comments in triplicate to Elizabeth M. Murphy,
Secretary, Securities and Exchange Commission, 100 F Street NE.,
Washington, DC 20549-1090.

All submissions should refer to File Number SR-NSX-2013-03. This file
number should be included on the subject line if email is used. To help
the Commission process and review your comments more efficiently,
please use only one method. The Commission will post all comments on
the Commission's Internet Web site (http://www.sec.gov/rules/sro.shtml). Copies of the submission, all subsequent amendments, all
written statements with respect to the proposed rule change that are
filed with the Commission, and all written communications relating to
the proposed rule change between the Commission and any person, other
than those that may be withheld from the public in accordance with the
provisions of 5 U.S.C. 552, will be available for Web site viewing and
printing in the Commission's Public Reference Room on official business
days between the hours of 10:00 a.m. and 3:00 p.m. Copies of such
filing also will be available for inspection and copying at the
principal offices of the Exchange. All comments received will be posted
without change; the Commission does not edit personal identifying
information from submissions. You should submit only information that
you wish to make available publicly. All submissions should refer to
File Number SR-NSX-2013-03, and should be submitted on or before March
4, 2013.

    For the Commission, by the Division of Trading and Markets,
pursuant to delegated authority.\17\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \17\ 17 CFR 200.30-3(a)(12).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

Kevin M. O'Neill,
Deputy Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2013-02923 Filed 2-8-13; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 8011-01-P


[Federal Register Volume 88, Number 235 (Friday, December 8, 2023)]
[Notices]
[Pages 85628-85629]
[FR Doc No: 2023-26994]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES

Food and Drug Administration

[Docket No. FDA-2023-N-3859]

Dr. Reddy's Laboratories, Inc.; Withdrawal of Approval of 11
Abbreviated New Drug Applications; Correction

AGENCY: Food and Drug Administration, HHS.

ACTION: Notice; correction.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Food and Drug Administration (FDA) is correcting a notice
that appeared in the Federal Register on October 4, 2023. The document
announced the withdrawal of approval of 11 abbreviated new drug
applications (ANDAs) from Dr. Reddy's Laboratories, Inc., withdrawn as
of November 3, 2023. The document indicated that FDA was withdrawing
approval of ANDA 203807, clozapine tablets, 25 milligrams (mg), 50 mg,
100 mg, and 200 mg, held by Dr. Reddy's Laboratories, Inc., U.S. Agent
for Dr. Reddy's Laboratories SA, 107 College Rd. East, Princeton, NJ
08540. Before FDA withdrew the approval of this ANDA, Dr. Reddy's
Laboratories, Inc., informed FDA that it did not want the approval of
the ANDA withdrawn. Because Dr. Reddy's Laboratories, Inc., timely
requested that approval of ANDA 203807 not be withdrawn, the approval
is still in effect. This notice corrects that error.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Martha Nguyen, Center for Drug
Evaluation and Research, Food and Drug Administration, 10903 New
Hampshire Ave., Bldg. 75, Rm. 1676, Silver Spring, MD 20993-0002, 240-
402-6980, [email protected].

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: In the Federal Register of Wednesday,
October 4, 2023 (88 FR 68628), appearing on

page 68629 in FR Doc. 2023-21992, the following correction is made:
    On page 68629, in the table, the entry for ANDA 203807 is removed.

    Dated: December 5, 2023.
Lauren K. Roth,
Associate Commissioner for Policy.
[FR Doc. 2023-26994 Filed 12-7-23; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4164-01-P


[Federal Register Volume 86, Number 65 (Wednesday, April 7, 2021)]
[Notices]
[Pages 18047-18049]
[FR Doc No: 2021-07157]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission

Combined Notice of Filings

    Take notice that the Commission has received the following Natural
Gas Pipeline Rate and Refund Report filings:

    Docket Number: PR21-40-000.
    Applicants: Southwest Gas Corporation.
    Description: Tariff filing per 284.123(b), (e)+(g): Amended SOC for
Blanket Certificate to be effective 4/1/2021.
    Filed Date: 3/30/2021.
    Accession Number:<PHONE_NUMBER>01.
    Comments Due: 5 p.m. ET 4/20/2021.

    284.123(g) Protests Due: 5 p.m. ET 6/1/2021.

    Docket Numbers: RP21-664-000.
    Applicants: Great Lakes Gas Transmission Limited Partnership.
    Description: Sec.  4(d) Rate Filing: WEPCO Neg Rate Agreement to be
effective 4/1/2021.

    Filed Date: 3/31/21.
    Accession Number: 20210331-5015.
    Comments Due: 5 p.m. ET 4/12/21.

    Docket Numbers: RP21-665-000.
    Applicants: Eastern Gas Transmission and Storage, Inc.
    Description: Sec.  4(d) Rate Filing: Eastern GTS--March 31, 2021
Negotiated Rate Agreement to be effective 4/1/2021.
    Filed Date: 3/31/21.
    Accession Number: 20210331-5020.
    Comments Due: 5 p.m. ET 4/12/21.

    Docket Numbers: RP21-666-000.
    Applicants: Eastern Gas Transmission and Storage, Inc.
    Description: Sec.  4(d) Rate Filing: Eastern GTS--March 31, 2021
Administrative Changes to be effective 5/1/2021.
    Filed Date: 3/31/21.
    Accession Number: 20210331-5031.
    Comments Due: 5 p.m. ET 4/12/21.

    Docket Numbers: RP21-667-000.
    Applicants: Eastern Gas Transmission and Storage, Inc.
    Description: Sec.  4(d) Rate Filing: Eastern GTS--March 31, 2021
MCS Negotiated Rate Agreements to be effective 4/1/2021.
    Filed Date: 3/31/21.
    Accession Number: 20210331-5036.
    Comments Due: 5 p.m. ET 4/12/21.

    Docket Numbers: RP21-668-000.
    Applicants: Hardy Storage Company, LLC.
    Description: Sec.  4(d) Rate Filing: RAM 2021 to be effective 5/1/
2021.
    Filed Date: 3/31/21.
    Accession Number: 20210331-5039.
    Comments Due: 5 p.m. ET 4/12/21.

    Docket Numbers: RP21-669-000.
    Applicants: Cove Point LNG, LP.
    Description: Sec.  4(d) Rate Filing: Cove Point--March 31, 2021
Administrative Change to be effective 5/1/2021.
    Filed Date: 3/31/21.
    Accession Number: 20210331-5040.
    Comments Due: 5 p.m. ET 4/12/21.

    Docket Numbers: RP21-670-000.
    Applicants: Carolina Gas Transmission, LLC.
    Description: Sec.  4(d) Rate Filing: Carolina Gas--March 31, 2021.
Administrative Changes to be effective 5/1/2021.
    Filed Date: 3/31/21.
    Accession Number: 20210331-5058.
    Comments Due: 5 p.m. ET 4/12/21.

    Docket Numbers: RP21-671-000.
    Applicants: Alliance Pipeline L.P.
    Description: Sec.  4(d) Rate Filing: Chinook Perm Release NRA to be
effective 4/1/2021.
    Filed Date: 3/31/21.
    Accession Number: 20210331-5115.
    Comments Due: 5 p.m. ET 4/12/21.

    Docket Numbers: RP21-672-000.
    Applicants: Gulf South Pipeline Company, LLC.
    Description: Sec.  4(d) Rate Filing: Cap Rel Neg Rate Agmts (FPL
41618, 41619 to Spire 53634, Eco-Energy 53741) to be effective 4/1/
2021.
    Filed Date: 3/31/21.
    Accession Number: 20210331-5118.
    Comments Due: 5 p.m. ET 4/12/21.

    Docket Numbers: RP21-673-000.
    Applicants: Gulf South Pipeline Company, LLC.
    Description: Sec.  4(d) Rate Filing: Cap Rel Neg Rate Agmt (JERA
46435 to EDF 53756) to be effective 4/1/2021.
    Filed Date: 3/31/21.
    Accession Number: 20210331-5119.
    Comments Due: 5 p.m. ET 4/12/21.

    Docket Numbers: RP21-674-000.
    Applicants: Gulf South Pipeline Company, LLC.
    Description: Sec.  4(d) Rate Filing: Cap Rel Neg Rate Agmts
(Atlanta Gas 8438 to various shippers eff 4-1-2021) to be effective 4/
1/2021.
    Filed Date: 3/31/21.
    Accession Number: 20210331-5128.
    Comments Due: 5 p.m. ET 4/12/21.

    Docket Numbers: RP21-675-000.
    Applicants: Gulf South Pipeline Company, LLC.
    Description: Sec.  4(d) Rate Filing: Cap Rel Neg Rate Agmts
(Marathon 51753, 51754 to Spire 53914, 53915) to be effective 4/1/2021.
    Filed Date: 3/31/21.
    Accession Number: 20210331-5129.
    Comments Due: 5 p.m. ET 4/12/21.

    Docket Numbers: RP21-676-000.
    Applicants: Gulf South Pipeline Company, LLC.
    Description: Sec.  4(d) Rate Filing: Cap Rel Neg Rate Agmt (Osaka
46429 to Texla 53939) to be effective 4/1/2021.
    Filed Date: 3/31/21.
    Accession Number: 20210331-5130.
    Comments Due: 5 p.m. ET 4/12/21.

    Docket Numbers: RP21-677-000.
    Applicants: Texas Gas Transmission, LLC.
    Description: Sec.  4(d) Rate Filing: Indiana Gas Capacity Releases
eff 4-1-2021 to be effective 4/1/2021.
    Filed Date: 3/31/21.
    Accession Number: 20210331-5156.
    Comments Due: 5 p.m. ET 4/12/21.

    Docket Numbers: RP21-678-000.
    Applicants: Texas Gas Transmission, LLC.
    Description: Sec.  4(d) Rate Filing: Cap Rel Neg Rate Agmt (Jay-Bee
34447 to MacQuarie 39067) to be effective 4/1/2021.
    Filed Date: 3/31/21.
    Accession Number: 20210331-5157.
    Comments Due: 5 p.m. ET 4/12/21.

    Docket Numbers: RP21-679-000.
    Applicants: Gulf South Pipeline Company, LLC.
    Description: Sec.  4(d) Rate Filing: Cap Rel Neg Rate Agmt
(Pensacola 43993 to BP 53944) to be effective 4/1/2021.
    Filed Date: 3/31/21.
    Accession Number: 20210331-5166.
    Comments Due: 5 p.m. ET 4/12/21.

    Docket Numbers: RP21-680-000.
    Applicants: Transcontinental Gas Pipe Line Company, LLC.
    Description: Sec.  4(d) Rate Filing: Negotiated Rates--Cherokee
AGL--Replacement Shippers--Apr 2021 to be effective 4/1/2021.
    Filed Date: 3/31/21.
    Accession Number: 20210331-5167.
    Comments Due: 5 p.m. ET 4/12/21.

    Docket Numbers: RP21-681-000.
    Applicants: Pine Needle LNG Company, LLC.
    Description: Sec.  4(d) Rate Filing: 2021 Annual Fuel and Electric
Power Tracker Filing to be effective 5/1/2021.
    Filed Date: 3/31/21.
    Accession Number: 20210331-5206.
    Comments Due: 5 p.m. ET 4/12/21.

    Docket Numbers: RP21-682-000.
    Applicants: Southwest Gas Storage Company.
    Description: Sec.  4(d) Rate Filing: Negotiated Rate Filing on 3-
31-2021 to be effective 4/1/2021.
    Filed Date: 3/31/21.
    Accession Number: 20210331-5207.
    Comments Due: 5 p.m. ET 4/12/21.

    Docket Numbers: RP21-683-000.
    Applicants: Rockies Express Pipeline LLC.
    Description: Sec.  4(d) Rate Filing: REX 2021-03-31 Negotiated Rate
Agreements to be effective 4/1/2021.
    Filed Date: 3/31/21.
    Accession Number: 20210331-5225.
    Comments Due: 5 p.m. ET 4/12/21.

    Docket Numbers: RP21-684-000.
    Applicants: Tallgrass Interstate Gas Transmission, LLC.
    Description: Sec.  4(d) Rate Filing: TIGT 2021-03-31 Negotiated
Rate Agreement Amendment to be effective 4/1/2021.
    Filed Date: 3/31/21.
    Accession Number: 20210331-5226.
    Comments Due: 5 p.m. ET 4/12/21.

    Docket Numbers: RP21-685-000.
    Applicants: El Paso Natural Gas Company, L.L.C.
    Description: Sec.  4(d) Rate Filing: Non-Conforming Letter
Agreement Update (SWG) to be effective 5/1/2021.
    Filed Date: 3/31/21.
    Accession Number: 20210331-5240.
    Comments Due: 5 p.m. ET 4/12/21.

    Docket Numbers: RP21-686-000.
    Applicants: Transcontinental Gas Pipe Line Company, LLC.
    Description: Sec.  4(d) Rate Filing: Crediting of Reservation
Charges--GSS, S-2, LNG, and LG-A to be effective 5/1/2021.

    Filed Date: 3/31/21.
    Accession Number: 20210331-5249.
    Comments Due: 5 p.m. ET 4/12/21.

    Docket Numbers: RP21-687-000.
    Applicants: Columbia Gas Transmission, LLC.
    Description: Sec.  4(d) Rate Filing: OTRA Summer 2021 to be
effective 5/1/2021.
    Filed Date: 3/31/21.
    Accession Number: 20210331-5259.
    Comments Due: 5 p.m. ET 4/12/21.

    Docket Numbers: RP21-688-000.
    Applicants: Cheniere Corpus Christi Pipeline L.P.
    Description: Annual Operations Transaction Report for 2020 of
Cheniere Corpus Christi Pipeline, L.P.
    Filed Date: 3/31/21.
    Accession Number: 20210331-5268.
    Comments Due: 5 p.m. ET 4/12/21.

    Docket Numbers: RP21-689-000.
    Applicants: Cheniere Creole Trail Pipeline, L.P.
    Description: Annual Operations Transaction Report for 2020 of
Cheniere Creole Trail Pipeline, L. P.
    Filed Date: 3/31/21.
    Accession Number: 20210331-5283.
    Comments Due: 5 p.m. ET 4/12/21.

    Docket Numbers: RP21-690-000.
    Applicants: Equitrans, L.P.
    Description: Sec.  4(d) Rate Filing: Negotiated Rate Service
Agreement--BP effective 4/1/2021 to be effective 4/1/2021.
    Filed Date: 3/31/21.
    Accession Number: 20210331-5288.
    Comments Due: 5 p.m. ET 4/12/21.

    Docket Numbers: RP21-691-000.
    Applicants: Midship Pipeline Company, LLC.
    Description: Annual Operations Transaction Report for 2020 of
Midship Pipeline Company, LLC.
    Filed Date: 3/31/21.
    Accession Number: 20210331-5302.
    Comments Due: 5 p.m. ET 4/12/21.

    Docket Numbers: RP21-692-000.
    Applicants: Texas Eastern Transmission, LP.
    Description: Sec.  4(d) Rate Filing: Negotiated Rates--MC Global
Amendment 911524 to be effective 4/1/2021.
    Filed Date: 3/31/21.
    Accession Number: 20210331-5322.
    Comments Due: 5 p.m. ET 4/12/21.

    Docket Numbers: RP21-693-000.
    Applicants: Northern Natural Gas Company.
    Description: Sec.  4(d) Rate Filing: 20210331 Negotiated Rate to be
effective 4/1/2021.
    Filed Date: 3/31/21.
    Accession Number: 20210331-5308.
    Comments Due: 5 p.m. ET 4/12/21.

    Docket Numbers: RP21-694-000.
    Applicants: Equitrans, L.P.
    Description: Sec.  4(d) Rate Filing: Negotiated Rate Service
Agreement--MEA effective 4/1/2021 to be effective 4/1/2021.
    Filed Date: 3/31/21.
    Accession Number: 20210331-5323.
    Comments Due: 5 p.m. ET 4/12/21.

    Docket Numbers: RP21-695-000.
    Applicants: Equitrans, L.P.
    Description: Sec.  4(d) Rate Filing: Negotiated Rate FTS Service
Agreements--effective 4/1/2021 to be effective 4/1/2021.
    Filed Date: 3/31/21.
    Accession Number: 20210331-5326.
    Comments Due: 5 p.m. ET 4/12/21.

    Docket Numbers: RP21-697-000.
    Applicants: East Tennessee Natural Gas, LLC.
    Description: 2019-2020 Cashout Report of East Tennessee Natural
Gas, LLC.
    Filed Date: 3/31/21.
    Accession Number: 20210331-5396.
    Comments Due: 5 p.m. ET 4/12/21.

    The filings are accessible in the Commission's eLibrary system
(https://elibrary.ferc.gov/idmws/search/fercgensearch.asp) by querying
the docket number.
    Any person desiring to intervene or protest in any of the above
proceedings must file in accordance with Rules 211 and 214 of the
Commission's Regulations (18 CFR 385.211 and 385.214) on or before 5:00
p.m. Eastern time on the specified date(s). Protests may be considered,
but intervention is necessary to become a party to the proceeding.
    eFiling is encouraged. More detailed information relating to filing
requirements, interventions, protests, service, and qualifying
facilities filings can be found at: http://www.ferc.gov/docs-filing/efiling/filing-req.pdf. For other information, call<PHONE_NUMBER>
(toll free). For TTY, call<PHONE_NUMBER>.

    Dated: April 1, 2021.
Nathaniel J. Davis, Sr.,
Deputy Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2021-07157 Filed 4-6-21; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6717-01-P


[Federal Register: March 8, 2006 (Volume 71, Number 45)]
[Proposed Rules]
[Page 11557]
[DOCID:fr08mr06-20]

=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission

18 CFR Part 40

[Docket Nos. RM06-8-000 and AD05-7-000]

Long-Term Firm Transmission Rights in Organized Electricity
Markets; Long-Term Transmission Rights in Markets Operated by Regional
Transmission Organizations and Independent System Operators; Notice of
Extension of Time

March 2, 2006.
AGENCY: Federal Energy Regulatory Commission, DOE.

ACTION: Notice of proposed rulemaking; extension of comment period.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: On February 2, 2006, the Commission issued a Notice of
Proposed Rulemaking which proposed to amend its regulations to require
transmission organizations that are public utilities with organized
electricity markets to make available long-term firm transmission
rights that satisfy certain guidelines established in this proceeding.
71 FR 6693 (Feb. 9, 2006). The Commission is extending the date for
filing reply comments on the proposed rule at the request of the
American Public Power Association, the National Rural Electric
Cooperative Association and the Transmission Access Policy Study Group.

DATES: The comment period for the proposed rule published at 71 FR
6693, February 9, 2006, is extended to April 3, 2006.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Jeffery S. Dennis (Legal Information),
Office of the General Counsel, Federal Energy Regulatory Commission,
888 First Street, NE., Washington, DC 20426.<PHONE_NUMBER>.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: On February 27, 2006, the American Public
Power Association (APPA), the National Rural Electric Cooperative
Association (NRECA), and the Transmission Access Policy Study Group
(TAPS) filed a joint motion for an extension of time to file reply
comments in response to the Commission's Notice of Proposed Rulemaking
(NOPR) issued February 2, 2006, in the above-docketed proceeding. Long-
Term Firm Transmission in Organized Electricity Markets, 114 FERC ]
61,097 (2006). The motion states that due to the complexity of the
issues addressed in the NOPR and the substantive number of initial
comments that were filed in this docket, additional time is needed to
prepare reply comments.
    Upon consideration, notice is hereby given that an extension of
time for filing reply comments is granted to and including April 3,
2006, as requested by APPA, NRECA and TAPS.
    The Commission will publish a separate notice in the Federal
Register announcing the extension of time to file reply comments in
this proceeding.

Magalie R. Salas,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. E6-3286 Filed 3-7-06; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 6717-01-P