[Federal Register Volume 85, Number 153 (Friday, August 7, 2020)]
[Notices]
[Pages 48065-48066]
[FR Doc No: 2020-17279]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION

Federal Motor Carrier Safety Administration

[Docket No. FMCSA-2020-0026]

Qualification of Drivers; Exemption Applications; Hearing

AGENCY: Federal Motor Carrier Safety Administration (FMCSA), DOT.

ACTION: Notice of applications for exemption; request for comments.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: FMCSA announces receipt of applications from 11 individuals
for an exemption from the hearing requirement in the Federal Motor
Carrier Safety Regulations (FMCSRs) to operate a commercial motor
vehicle (CMV) in interstate commerce. If granted, the exemptions would
enable these hard of hearing and deaf individuals to operate CMVs in
interstate commerce.

DATES: Comments must be received on or before September 8, 2020.

ADDRESSES: You may submit comments identified by the Federal Docket
Management System (FDMS) Docket No. FMCSA-2020-0026 using any of the
following methods:
     Federal eRulemaking Portal: Go to http://www.regulations.gov/docket?D=FMCSA-2020-0026. Follow the online
instructions for submitting comments.
     Mail: Docket Operations; U.S. Department of
Transportation, 1200 New Jersey Avenue SE, West Building Ground Floor,
Room W12-140, Washington, DC 20590-0001.
     Hand Delivery: West Building Ground Floor, Room W12-140,
1200 New Jersey Avenue SE, Washington, DC, between 9 a.m. and 5 p.m.,
ET, Monday through Friday, except Federal Holidays.
     Fax:<PHONE_NUMBER>.
    To avoid duplication, please use only one of these four methods.
See the ``Public Participation'' portion of the SUPPLEMENTARY
INFORMATION section for instructions on submitting comments.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Ms. Christine A. Hydock, Chief,
Medical Programs Division,<PHONE_NUMBER><EMAIL_ADDRESS>FMCSA,
Department of Transportation, 1200 New Jersey Avenue SE, Room W64-224,
Washington, DC 20590-0001. Office hours are 8:30 a.m. to 5 p.m., ET,
Monday through Friday, except Federal holidays. If you have questions
regarding viewing or submitting material to the docket, contact Docket
Operations,<PHONE_NUMBER>.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

I. Public Participation

A. Submitting Comments

    If you submit a comment, please include the docket number for this
notice (Docket No. FMCSA-2020-0026), indicate the specific section of
this document to which each comment applies, and provide a reason for
each suggestion or recommendation. You may submit your comments and
material online or by fax, mail, or hand delivery, but please use only
one of these means. FMCSA recommends that you include your name and a
mailing address, an email address, or a phone number in the body of
your document so that FMCSA can contact you if there are questions
regarding your submission.
    To submit your comment online, go to http://www.regulations.gov/docket?D=FMCSA-2020-0026. Click on the ``Comment Now!'' button and type
your comment into the text box on the following screen. Choose whether
you are submitting your comment as an individual or on behalf of a
third party and then submit.
    If you submit your comments by mail or hand delivery, submit them
in an unbound format, no larger than 8\1/2\ by 11 inches, suitable for
copying and electronic filing. If you submit comments by mail and would
like to know that they reached the facility, please enclose a stamped,
self-addressed postcard or envelope.
    FMCSA will consider all comments and material received during the
comment period.

B. Viewing Documents and Comments

    To view comments, as well as any documents mentioned in this notice
as being available in the docket, go to http://www.regulations.gov/docket?D=FMCSA-2020-0026 and choose the document to review. If you do
not have access to the internet, you may view the docket online by
visiting the Docket Operations in Room W12-140 on the ground floor of
the DOT West Building, 1200 New Jersey Avenue SE, Washington, DC 20590,
between 9 a.m. and 5 p.m., ET, Monday through Friday, except Federal
holidays. To be sure someone is there to help you, please call (202)
366-9317 or<PHONE_NUMBER> before visiting Docket Operations.

C. Privacy Act

    In accordance with 5 U.S.C. 553(c), DOT solicits comments from the
public to better inform its rulemaking process. DOT posts these
comments, without edit, including any personal information the
commenter provides, to www.regulations.gov, as described in the system
of records notice (DOT/ALL-14 FDMS), which can be reviewed at
www.transportation.gov/privacy.

II. Background

    Under 49 U.S.C. 31136(e) and 31315(b), FMCSA may grant an exemption
from the FMCSRs for no longer than a 5-year period if it finds such
exemption would likely achieve a level of safety that is equivalent to,
or greater than, the level that would be achieved absent such
exemption. The statute also allows the Agency to renew exemptions at
the end of the 5-year period. FMCSA grants medical exemptions from the
FMCSRs for a 2-year period to align with the maximum duration of a
driver's medical certification.
    The 11 individuals listed in this notice have requested an
exemption from the hearing requirement in 49 CFR 391.41(b)(11).
Accordingly, the Agency will evaluate the qualifications of each
applicant to determine whether granting the exemption will achieve the
required level of safety mandated by statute.
    The physical qualification standard for drivers regarding hearing
found in Sec.  391.41(b)(11) states that a person is physically
qualified to drive a CMV if that person first perceives a forced
whispered voice in the better ear at not less than 5 feet with or
without the use of a hearing aid or, if tested by use of an audiometric
device, does not have an average hearing loss in the better ear greater
than 40 decibels at 500 Hz, 1,000 Hz, and 2,000 Hz with or without a
hearing aid when the audiometric device is calibrated to American
National Standard (formerly ASA Standard) Z24.5--1951.
    This standard was adopted in 1970 and was revised in 1971 to allow
drivers to be qualified under this standard while wearing a hearing
aid, 35 FR 6458, 6463 (April 22, 1970) and 36 FR 12857 (July 3, 1971).
    On February 1, 2013, FMCSA announced in a Notice of Final
Disposition titled, ``Qualification of Drivers; Application for
Exemptions; National Association of the Deaf,'' (78 FR 7479), its
decision to grant requests from 40 individuals for exemptions from the
Agency's physical qualification standard concerning hearing for
interstate CMV drivers. Since that time the Agency has published
additional notices granting requests from hard of hearing and deaf
individuals for exemptions from the Agency's physical qualification
standard concerning hearing for interstate CMV drivers.

III. Qualifications of Applicants

Ymarc Anthony Ancheta

    Mr. Ancheta, 25, holds a class D license in Connecticut.

Victor Contreras

    Mr. Contreras, 37, holds a class D license in Illinois.

Chauncey Crawford

    Mr. Crawford, 38, holds a class A license in Ohio.

Jonathan Kelly

    Mr. Kelly, 37, holds a class C license in Texas.

Robert King

    Mr. King, 44, holds a class CA CDL in Michigan.

Steven Levine

    Mr. Levine, 44, holds a D license in Minnesota.

Eddie Martinez

    Mr. Martinez, 45, holds a class C license in Texas.

Willie Miller

    Mr. Miller, 43, holds a class A CDL in Iowa.

John Racine

    Mr. Racine, 55, holds a class C license in North Carolina.

Mark Slieter

    Mr. Slieter, 71, holds a class A license in Kansas.

Keith Soch

    Mr. Soch, 54, holds a class C license in Texas.

IV. Request for Comments

    In accordance with 49 U.S.C. 31136(e) and 31315(b), FMCSA requests
public comment from all interested persons on the exemption petitions
described in this notice. We will consider all comments received before
the close of business on the closing date indicated under the DATES
section of the notice.

Larry W. Minor,
Associate Administrator for Policy.
[FR Doc. 2020-17279 Filed 8-6-20; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910-EX-P


--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Initial Review Checklist for ICR Desk Officers  -  ICR Renewal Packages
INSTRUCTIONS: Complete Initial Review Checklist within 2 business days of receiving the ICR renewal package. Provide checklist to Team Lead when complete.

ICR Information
ICR Title
Tips and Complaints Regarding Environmental Violations
EPA ICR Number
2219.07
OMB Control Number
2020-0032
ICR Desk Officer
Aaron Jackson

Step 1: Review ICR Package for Completeness
Note: If the answer to any of the questions in this section is NO, the ICR renewal package is NOT complete and needs to be returned to the ICR Owner.  Via email, indicate to the ICR Owner what is missing and that it needs to be included in order for the ICR package to be marked as "received."  Include the ICR Team Lead on this email.  If the answers to ALL of these questions are YES, proceed to Step 2 in the checklist.

                            Comments for Team Lead

Does the ICR package contain all of the required files - Supporting Statement, Draft Federal Register Notice and ICR Submission Worksheet?

Has the comment period for the 1[st] Federal Register Notice closed?

                                       x
Does the Supporting Statement contain all major sections listed in template?
Section 6 is using a basic breakdown. POC explained that it was allowed by Courtney Kerwin. Please view the SS for further information.

Has the ICR Owner completed consultations as part of this ICR renewal cycle?
HINT: Section 3c of the supporting statement should address the consultations conducted for this renewal.

Step 2: Update ICR Tracker Information

                            Comments for Team Lead

Enter the received date in the ICR Tracker in the "Submitted to OMS" column.

                                       x
Check to see if the EPA ICR Number in the ICR materials provided by the POC match EPA ICR Number listed in the ICR Tracker.

Incorrect number provided by POV  in 1st and 2[nd] FRN. Sent correct number in initial email. Not sure what happened.
Step 3: Update ICRAS Information

                            Comments for Team Lead

Create a new ICR package in ICRAS if one does not already exist.

Check if there any other pending packages in ICRAS (whether pending at EPA or OMB).

                             If so, list packages.

Check to see if the EPA ICR Number in the ICR materials provided by the POC match EPA ICR Number listed in ICRAS.

ICR Number in the package were incorrect, but I changed the number on the files.
Step 4: Content Review

                            Comments for Team Lead

Determine if the total annual hours/costs are changing by more than 25%.
HINT: Look at the Bottom Line Burden section of the Supporting Statement and compare those amounts to the current amounts listed in ICRAS. If the difference between those numbers is larger than the existing burden hours/costs divided by 4, the change exceeds 25%.
                            If so, describe change.

Check if there are Part 2 tabs in the ICR Submission Worksheet for all existing Part 2 ICs in ICRAS.
                           If not, list missing ICs.
Step 5: Request FRL Number

                            Comments for Team Lead
                                      ☐
Submit request to create a new FRL # and prepare the Typesetting Request.
NOTE: For OCSPP ICRs, check the FR Notice first to see if there is already an FRL Number.  If there is an FRL Number, provide this to Bill so he can add it to the Typesetting Request.
I have never done this. Can you please explain?
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
ICR Supporting Statement Outline  -  Part A

 1. Identification of the Information Collection
 	1(a) Title of the Information Collection
 	1(b) Short Characterization/Abstract
 2. Need for and use of the Collection
 	2(a) Need/Authority for the Collection
 	2(b) Practical Utility/Users of the Data
 3. Non-duplication, Consultations, and Other Collection Criteria
 	3(a) Non-duplication
 	3(b) Public Notice Required Prior to ICR submission to OMB
 	3(c) Consultations
 	3(d) Effects of Less Frequent Collection
 	3(e) General Guidelines
 	3(f) Confidentiality
 	3(g) Sensitive Questions
 4. The Respondents and the Information Requested
 	4(a) Respondents/SIC Codes
 	4(b) Information Requested
 		(i) Data items, including record keeping requirements
 		(ii) Respondent Activities
 5. The Information Collected - Agency Activities, Collection Methodology, and Information Management
 	5(a) Agency Activities
 	5(b) Collection Methodology and Management
 	5(c) Small Entity Flexibility
 	5(d) Collection Schedule
 6. Estimating the Burden and Cost of the Collection
 	6(a) Estimating Respondent Burden
 	6(b) Estimating Respondent Costs
 		(i) Estimating Labor Costs
 		(ii) Estimating Capital and Operations and Maintenance Costs
 		(iii) Capital/Start-up Operating and Maintenance (O&M) Costs
 		(iv) Annualizing Capital Costs
 	6(c) Estimating Agency Burden and Cost
 	6(d) Estimating the Respondent Universe and Total Burden and Costs
 	6(e) Bottom Line Burden Hours and Cost Tables
 		(i) Respondent Tally
 		(ii) The Agency Tally
 		(iii) Variations in the Annual Bottom Line
 	6(f) Reasons for Change in Burden
 	6(g) Burden Statement


[Federal Register Volume 88, Number 46 (Thursday, March 9, 2023)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Pages 14486-14487]
[FR Doc No: 2023-04769]

=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION

Federal Aviation Administration

14 CFR Part 71

[Docket No. FAA-2022-0245; Airspace Docket No. 19-AAL-49]
RIN 2120-AA66

Establishment of United States Area Navigation (RNAV) Route T-
380; Emmonak, AK

AGENCY: Federal Aviation Administration (FAA), DOT.

ACTION: Final rule, delay of effective date.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: This action delays the effective date of a final rule
published in the Federal Register on November 28, 2022, establishing
area navigation (RNAV) route T-380 in the vicinity of Emmonak, AK. The
FAA is delaying the effective date to allow sufficient time for
completion of the required flight inspection of the route.

DATES: The effective date of the final rule published on November 28,
2022

(87 FR 72871) is delayed until further notice. The FAA will publish a
document in the Federal Register announcing the new effective date. The
Director of the Federal Register approved this incorporation by
reference action under 1 CFR part 51, subject to the annual revision of
FAA Order JO 7400.11 and publication of conforming amendments.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Paul Gallant, Rules and Regulations
Group, Office of Policy, Federal Aviation Administration, 800
Independence Avenue SW, Washington, DC 20591; telephone: (202) 267-
8783.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

Background

    The FAA published a final rule in the Federal Register for Docket
No. FAA-2022-0245 (87 FR 72871, November 28, 2022), establishing RNAV
route T-380 in the vicinity of Emmonak, AK. The effective date for that
final rule is April 20, 2023. Subsequent to the final rule, it was
determined that the required flight inspection of T-380 was not
completed due to weather conditions. The onset of winter weather
conditions in Alaska will further impact the completion of flight
inspections.
    To facilitate the safe and continuous use of existing air traffic
procedures and allow sufficient time for completion of the required
flight inspection of route T-380, the effective date of this rule is
delayed until further notice. The FAA will publish a document in the
Federal Register announcing the new effective date.

Delay of Effective Date

    Accordingly, pursuant to the authority delegated to me, the
effective date of the final rule, Airspace Docket No. 19-AAL-49, as
published in the Federal Register on November 28, 2022 (87 FR 72871),
is hereby delayed until further notice.

    Authority:  49 U.S.C. 106(f), 106(g); 40103, 40113, 40120; E.O.
10854, 24 FR 9565, 3 CFR, 1959-1963 Comp., P. 389.
* * * * *

    Issued in Washington, DC, on March 3, 2023.
Brian Konie,
Acting Manager, Airspace Rules and Regulations.
[FR Doc. 2023-04769 Filed 3-8-23; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910-13-P


[Federal Register Volume 86, Number 38 (Monday, March 1, 2021)]
[Notices]
[Pages 12013-12014]
[FR Doc No: 2021-04151]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY

Federal Emergency Management Agency

[Docket ID FEMA-2021-0002; Internal Agency Docket No. FEMA-B-2112]

Proposed Flood Hazard Determinations

AGENCY: Federal Emergency Management Agency, Department of Homeland
Security.

ACTION: Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: Comments are requested on proposed flood hazard
determinations, which may include additions or modifications of any
Base Flood Elevation (BFE), base flood depth, Special Flood Hazard Area
(SFHA) boundary or zone designation, or regulatory floodway on the
Flood Insurance Rate Maps (FIRMs), and where applicable, in the
supporting Flood Insurance Study (FIS) reports for the communities
listed in the table below. The purpose of this notice is to seek
general information and comment regarding the preliminary FIRM, and
where applicable, the FIS report that the Federal Emergency Management
Agency (FEMA) has provided to the affected communities. The FIRM and
FIS report are the basis of the floodplain management measures that the
community is required either to adopt or to show evidence of having in
effect in order to qualify or remain qualified for participation in the
National Flood Insurance Program (NFIP). In addition, the FIRM and FIS
report, once effective, will be used by insurance agents and others to
calculate appropriate flood insurance premium rates for new buildings
and the contents of those buildings.

DATES: Comments are to be submitted on or before June 1, 2021.

ADDRESSES: The Preliminary FIRM, and where applicable, the FIS report
for each community are available for inspection at both the online
location https://hazards.fema.gov/femaportal/prelimdownload and the
respective

Community Map Repository address listed in the tables below.
Additionally, the current effective FIRM and FIS report for each
community are accessible online through the FEMA Map Service Center at
https://msc.fema.gov for comparison.
    You may submit comments, identified by Docket No. FEMA-B-2112, to
Rick Sacbibit, Chief, Engineering Services Branch, Federal Insurance
and Mitigation Administration, FEMA, 400 C Street SW, Washington, DC
20472,<PHONE_NUMBER>, or (email<EMAIL_ADDRESS>
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Rick Sacbibit, Chief, Engineering
Services Branch, Federal Insurance and Mitigation Administration, FEMA,
400 C Street SW, Washington, DC 20472,<PHONE_NUMBER>, or (email)
<EMAIL_ADDRESS>or visit the FEMA Mapping and Insurance
eXchange (FMIX) online at https://www.floodmaps.fema.gov/fhm/fmx_main.html.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: FEMA proposes to make flood hazard
determinations for each community listed below, in accordance with
section 110 of the Flood Disaster Protection Act of 1973, 42 U.S.C.
4104, and 44 CFR 67.4(a).
    These proposed flood hazard determinations, together with the
floodplain management criteria required by 44 CFR 60.3, are the minimum
that are required. They should not be construed to mean that the
community must change any existing ordinances that are more stringent
in their floodplain management requirements. The community may at any
time enact stricter requirements of its own or pursuant to policies
established by other Federal, State, or regional entities. These flood
hazard determinations are used to meet the floodplain management
requirements of the NFIP and are used to calculate the appropriate
flood insurance premium rates for new buildings built after the FIRM
and FIS report become effective.
    The communities affected by the flood hazard determinations are
provided in the tables below. Any request for reconsideration of the
revised flood hazard information shown on the Preliminary FIRM and FIS
report that satisfies the data requirements outlined in 44 CFR 67.6(b)
is considered an appeal. Comments unrelated to the flood hazard
determinations also will be considered before the FIRM and FIS report
become effective.
    Use of a Scientific Resolution Panel (SRP) is available to
communities in support of the appeal resolution process. SRPs are
independent panels of experts in hydrology, hydraulics, and other
pertinent sciences established to review conflicting scientific and
technical data and provide recommendations for resolution. Use of the
SRP only may be exercised after FEMA and local communities have been
engaged in a collaborative consultation process for at least 60 days
without a mutually acceptable resolution of an appeal. Additional
information regarding the SRP process can be found online at https://www.floodsrp.org/pdfs/srp_overview.pdf.
    The watersheds and/or communities affected are listed in the tables
below. The Preliminary FIRM, and where applicable, FIS report for each
community are available for inspection at both the online location
https://hazards.fema.gov/femaportal/prelimdownload and the respective
Community Map Repository address listed in the tables. For communities
with multiple ongoing Preliminary studies, the studies can be
identified by the unique project number and Preliminary FIRM date
listed in the tables. Additionally, the current effective FIRM and FIS
report for each community are accessible online through the FEMA Map
Service Center at https://msc.fema.gov for comparison.

(Catalog of Federal Domestic Assistance No. 97.022, ``Flood
Insurance.'')

Michael M. Grimm,
Assistant Administrator for Risk Management, Department of Homeland
Security, Federal Emergency Management Agency.

------------------------------------------------------------------------
                                             Community map repository
               Community                             address
------------------------------------------------------------------------
              Humboldt County, Iowa and Incorporated Areas
          Project: 19-07-0032S Preliminary Date: March 27, 2020
------------------------------------------------------------------------
City of Humboldt.......................  Municipal Building, 29 5th
                                          Street South, Humboldt, IA
                                          50548.
Unincorporated Areas of Humboldt County  Humboldt County Courthouse, 203
                                          Main Street, Dakota City, IA
                                          50529.
------------------------------------------------------------------------
               Monona County, Iowa and Incorporated Areas
        Project: 18-07-0012S Preliminary Date: February 28, 2020
------------------------------------------------------------------------
City of Blencoe........................  City Hall, 413 Main Street,
                                          Blencoe, IA 51523.
City of Castana........................  City Hall, 103 3rd Street,
                                          Castana, IA 51010.
City of Mapleton.......................  City Hall, 513 Main Street,
                                          Mapleton, IA 51034.
City of Moorhead.......................  City Hall, 100 Oak Street,
                                          Moorhead, IA 51558.
City of Onawa..........................  City Hall, 914 Diamond Street,
                                          Onawa, IA 51040.
City of Rodney.........................  City Hall, 219 Main Street,
                                          Rodney, IA 51051.
City of Soldier........................  City Hall, 108 Oak Street,
                                          Soldier, IA 51572.
City of Turin..........................  City Hall, 302 Highway 175,
                                          Turin, IA 51040.
City of Ute............................  City Hall, 130 East Main
                                          Street, Ute, IA 51060.
City of Whiting........................  City Hall, 605 Whittier Street,
                                          Whiting, IA 51063.
Omaha Tribe of Nebraska................  Omaha Tribal Administration
                                          Building, 100 Main Street,
                                          Macy, NE 68039.
Unincorporated Areas of Monona County..  Monona County Courthouse, 610
                                          Iowa Avenue, Onawa, IA 51040.
------------------------------------------------------------------------
                 Sac County, Iowa and Incorporated Areas
           Project: 17-07-0044S Preliminary Date: July 6, 2019
------------------------------------------------------------------------
City of Schaller.......................  City Hall, 101 South Main
                                          Street, Schaller, IA 51053.
------------------------------------------------------------------------

[FR Doc. 2021-04151 Filed 2-26-21; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 9110-12-P


[Federal Register Volume 76, Number 70 (Tuesday, April 12, 2011)]
[Notices]
[Page 20437]
[FR Doc No: 2011-8740]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION

Federal Aviation Administration

Fourteenth Meeting: Joint RTCA Special Committee 213: EUROCAE WG-
79: Enhanced Flight Vision Systems/Synthetic Vision Systems (EFVS/SVS)

AGENCY: Federal Aviation Administration (FAA), Department of
Transportation (DOT).

ACTION: Notice of Joint RTCA Special Committee 213: EUROCAE WG-79:
Enhanced Flight Vision Systems/Synthetic Vision Systems (EFVS/SVS).

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The FAA is issuing this notice to advise the public of a
meeting of Joint RTCA Special Committee 213: EUROCAE WG-79: Enhanced
Flight Vision Systems/Synthetic Vision Systems (EFVS/SVS).

DATES: The meeting will be held May 5, from 8:30 a.m.-3 p.m.

ADDRESS: The meeting will be held at RTCA, Inc., 1828 L Street, NW.,
Suite 805, Washington, DC 20036. Point of Contact is<EMAIL_ADDRESS>
telephone<PHONE_NUMBER>, Fax<PHONE_NUMBER>.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: (1) RTCA Secretariat, 1828 L Street,
NW., Suite 805, Washington, DC, 20036; telephone<PHONE_NUMBER>; fax
(202) 833-9434; Web site http://www.rtca.org org.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Pursuant to section 10(a)(2) of the Federal
Advisory Committee Act (Pub. L. 92-463, 5 U.S.C., Appendix 2), notice
is hereby given for a Joint RTCA Special Committee 213: EUROCAE WG-79:
Enhanced Flight Vision Systems/Synthetic Vision Systems (EFVS/SVS)
meeting.
    The agenda will include:

Tuesday, March 29

     8 a.m.-3 p.m. Plenary
     Introductions and administrative items
     Review of the meeting agenda
     Review and resolve Final Review and Comment (FRAC)
comments to revised DO-315A FRAC Draft
     Any other business
     Administrative items (meeting schedule)
     Adjourn
    Attendance is open to the interested public but limited to space
availability. With the approval of the chairmen, members of the public
may present oral statements at the meeting. Persons wishing to present
statements or obtain information should contact the person listed in
the FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT section. Members of the public may
present a written statement to the committee at any time.

    Issued in Washington, DC, April 6, 2011.
Robert L. Bostiga,
RTCA Advisory Committee.
[FR Doc. 2011-8740 Filed 4-11-11; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910-13-P


Imazapyr Reader's Guide Reader's Guide to Imazapyr E Docket # OPP 2005 0495 EPA has created this document to provide an organizational structure to the imazapyr e Docket. The docket index organizes and explains related documents. The first group contains the Federal Register, Docket Organizational Document, and the Reregistration Eligibility Decision ( RED) Document; the second group contains the Environmental Fate and Effects Responses to Phase 3 Public Comments and revised Appendix H. The Agency is providing the " Reader's Guide" to allow the reader to more easily access and navigate the various items contained in the imazapyr edocket

Federal Register and Docket Organizational Documents:

Docket Item 1: Federal Register Notice: Imazapyr Reregistration Eligibility Decision This notice announces that the imazapyr Reregistration Eligibility Decision ( RED) document and related documents are available to the public.

Docket Item 2: Reader's Guide to the Imazapyr E Docket # OPP 2005 0495 The reader's guide is designed to give a brief description of all the imazapyr documents in the imazapyr e Docket.

Docket Item 3: Reregistration Eligibility Decision ( RED) Document for Imazapyr This document is the Reregistration Eligibility Decision ( RED).

Environmental Fate and Effects Documents for Phase 4:

Docket Item 4: EFED Responses to Imazapyr Phase 3 Comments March 29, 2006   Stephen Carey, Pamela Hurley, and Lucy Shanaman This document is the Agency's response to Phase 3 comments on the Ecological Risk Assessment.

Docket Item 5: APPENDIX H. Summary of Endangered/ Threatened Species of the Level 1 Screening Ecological Risk Assessment for the Reregistration of Imazapyr December 9, 2005   Stephen Carey, Pamela Hurley, and Lucy Shanaman This document is the revised Appendix H of the Ecological Risk Assessment based on Phase 3 comments.


[Federal Register Volume 86, Number 222 (Monday, November 22, 2021)]
[Notices]
[Pages 66299-66300]
[FR Doc No: 2021-25425]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY

[EPA-HQ-OAR-2003-0033; FRL 9295-01-OMS]

Information Collection Request Submitted to OMB for Review and
Approval; Comment Request; EPA's ENERGY STAR[supreg] Product Labeling
(Renewal)

AGENCY: Environmental Protection Agency (EPA).

ACTION: Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) has submitted an
information collection request (ICR), EPA's ENERGY STAR Product
Labeling (EPA ICR Number 2078.08, OMB Control Number 2060-0528) to the
Office of Management and Budget (OMB) for review and approval in
accordance with the Paperwork Reduction Act. This is a proposed
extension of the ICR, which is currently approved through January 31,
2022. Public comments were previously requested via the Federal
Register on May 26, 2021 during a 60-day comment period. This notice
allows for an additional 30 days for public comments. A fuller
description of the ICR is given below, including its estimated burden
and cost to the public. An agency may not conduct or sponsor and a
person is not required to respond to a collection of information unless
it displays a currently valid OMB control number.

DATES: Additional comments may be submitted on or before December 22,
2021.

ADDRESSES: Submit your comments to EPA, referencing Docket ID No. EPA-
HQ-OAR-2003-0033, to (1) EPA online using www.regulations.gov (our
preferred method), [email protected], or by mail to: EPA Docket
Center, Environmental Protection Agency, Mail Code 28221T, 1200
Pennsylvania Ave. NW, Washington, DC 20460, and (2) OMB via email to
[email protected]. Address comments to OMB Desk Officer for
EPA. EPA's policy is that all comments received will be included in the
public docket without change including any personal information
provided, unless the comment includes profanity, threats, information
claimed to be Confidential Business Information (CBI), or other
information whose disclosure is restricted by statute.
    Submit written comments and recommendations to OMB for the proposed
information collection within 30 days of publication of this notice to
www.reginfo.gov/public/do/PRAMain. Find this particular information
collection by selecting ``Currently under 30-day Review--Open for
Public Comments'' or by using the search function.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: James Kwon, Climate Protection
Partnerships Division, Office of Air and Radiation, Mailcode 6202A,
Environmental Protection Agency, 1200 Pennsylvania Ave. NW, Washington,
DC 20460; telephone number:<PHONE_NUMBER>; fax number:<PHONE_NUMBER>;
email address: [email protected].

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Supporting documents, which explain in
detail the information that the EPA will be collecting, are available
in the public docket for this ICR. The docket can be viewed online at
www.regulations.gov or in person at the EPA Docket Center, WJC West,
Room 3334, 1301 Constitution Ave. NW, Washington, DC. The telephone
number for the Docket Center is<PHONE_NUMBER>. For additional
information about EPA's public docket, visit http://www.epa.gov/dockets.
    Abstract: ENERGY STAR is a voluntary program developed in
collaboration with industry to create a self-sustaining market for
energy efficient products. The center piece of the program is the
ENERGY STAR label, a registered certification label that helps
consumers identify products that save energy, save money, and help
protect the environment without sacrificing quality or performance.
    EPA partners with retailers, energy efficiency program sponsors
(EEPS), and product brand owners who wish to use the ENERGY STAR label
to differentiate products as more energy efficient. Retailers, EEPS,
and product brand owners sign and submit a Partnership Application (PA)
with EPA to become a partner, indicating that they voluntarily agree to
fulfill the relevant program requirements referenced in the Partnership
Agreement Form and Participation Form.
    Prior to labeling a product as ENERGY STAR, partners have eligible
products tested in an EPA-recognized laboratory and certified by an
EPA-recognized third-party certification body (CB). To minimize the
burden on partners, EPA maintains an automated data exchange with CBs.
The CBs share information with EPA on products they review from EPA-
recognized laboratories during the certification process. The XML-based
data exchange allows the CBs to automatically transmit information on

certified products to EPA from their database via web services. This
automated system eliminates the need for paper submissions.
    The certification process also includes requirements for CBs to
report to EPA products that were reviewed, but not eligible for
certification, as well as to conduct post-market verification testing
of a sampling of ENERGY STAR certified products. CBs complete a minimum
amount of verification testing and share information with EPA on
products verified twice a year. CBs report to EPA any post-market test
data indicating a product may no longer meet the program requirements.
While most product-related information is provided by CBs, partners are
asked to submit to EPA annual unit shipment data for their ENERGY STAR
certified products.
    Finally, partners that wish to receive recognition for their
efforts in ENERGY STAR may submit an application for the Partner of the
Year Award. Partners that have ENERGY STAR certified central air
conditioners, air-source heat pumps, furnaces, geothermal heat pumps,
and windows that meet the ENERGY STAR Most Efficient criteria may
submit an application to gain ENERGY STAR Most Efficient recognition.
    Form Numbers: 5900-252, 5900-251, 5900-33, 5900-253, 5900-168,
5900-206, 5900-207, 5900-28, 5900-208, 5900-210, 5900-228, 5900-234,
5900-229, 5900-235, 5900-47, 5900-349, 5900-350, 5900-351, 5900-348,
5900-35, 5900-37, 5900-38, 5900-39, 5900-41, 5900-42, 5900-43, 5900-44,
5900-48, 5900-49, 5900-50, 5900-51, 5900-54, 5900-55, 5900-56, 5900-57,
5900-58, 5900-230, 5900-224, 5900-227, 5900-166, 5900-165, 5900-164,
5900-226, 5900-163, 5900-34, 5900-216, 5900-217, 5900-218, 5900-388,
5900-254, 5900-255, 5900-439, 5900-440, 5900-415, 5900-416, 5900-438,
5900-417, 5900-483.
    Respondents/affected entities: Partners in ENERGY STAR.
    Respondent's obligation to respond: Voluntary.
    Estimated number of respondents: 2,732.
    Frequency of response: Initially/one-time, on occasion, semi-
annually, annually.
    Total estimated burden: 40,391 hours (per year). Burden is defined
at 5 CFR 1320.03(b)
    Total estimated cost: $2,546,557 (per year), includes $0 annualized
capital or operation & maintenance costs.
    Changes in the estimates: There is no change of in the total
estimated respondent burden compared with the ICR currently approved by
OMB.

Courtney Kerwin,
Director, Regulatory Support Division.
[FR Doc. 2021-25425 Filed 11-19-21; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6560-50-P


[Federal Register Volume 86, Number 167 (Wednesday, September 1, 2021)]
[Notices]
[Page 49088]
[FR Doc No: 2021-18793]

=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION

Federal Aviation Administration

[Summary Notice No. -2022-2111]

Petition for Exemption; Summary of Petition Received; Corvus
Airlines Inc. (dba Ravn Alaska)

AGENCY: Federal Aviation Administration (FAA), Department of
Transportation (DOT).

ACTION: Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: This notice contains a summary of a petition seeking relief
from specified requirements of Federal Aviation Regulations. The
purpose of this notice is to improve the public's awareness of, and
participation in, FAA's exemption process. Neither publication of this
notice nor the inclusion nor omission of information in the summary is
intended to affect the legal status of the petition or its final
disposition.

DATES: Comments on this petition must identify the petition docket
number and must be received on or before September 21, 2021.

ADDRESSES: Send comments identified by docket number FAA-2021-0423
using any of the following methods:
     Federal eRulemaking Portal: Go to http://www.regulations.gov and follow the online instructions for sending your
comments electronically.
     Mail: Send comments to Docket Operations, M-30; U.S.
Department of Transportation, 1200 New Jersey Avenue SE, Room W12-140,
West Building Ground Floor, Washington, DC 20590-0001.
     Hand Delivery or Courier: Take comments to Docket
Operations in Room W12-140 of the West Building Ground Floor at 1200
New Jersey Avenue SE, Washington, DC 20590-0001, between 9 a.m. and 5
p.m., Monday through Friday, except Federal holidays.
     Fax: Fax comments to Docket Operations at<PHONE_NUMBER>.
    Privacy: In accordance with 5 U.S.C. 553(c), DOT solicits comments
from the public to better inform its rulemaking process. DOT posts
these comments, without edit, including any personal information the
commenter provides, to http://www.regulations.gov, as described in the
system of records notice (DOT/ALL-14 FDMS), which can be reviewed at
http://www.dot.gov/privacy.
    Docket: Background documents or comments received may be read at
http://www.regulations.gov at any time. Follow the online instructions
for accessing the docket or go to the Docket Operations in Room W12-140
of the West Building Ground Floor at 1200 New Jersey Avenue SE,
Washington, DC 20590-0001, between 9 a.m. and 5 p.m., Monday through
Friday, except Federal holidays.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Tiffany Jackson<PHONE_NUMBER>), Office
of Rulemaking, Federal Aviation Administration, 800 Independence Avenue
SW, Washington, DC 20591.
    This notice is published pursuant to 14 CFR 11.85.

    Issued in Washington, DC.
Timothy Adams,
Acting Executive Director, Office of Rulemaking.

Petition for Exemption

    Docket No.: FAA-2021-0423.
    Petitioner: Corvus Airlines dba Ravn Alaska.
    Section(s) of 14 CFR Affected: Sec.  121.407(a)(1)(ii).
    Description of Relief Sought: The petitioner operates a De
Havilland (DHC) DHC-8-103 and DHC-8-106 series aircraft and seeks
relief from Sec.  121.407(a)(1)(ii) of Title 14, Code of Federal
Regulations (14 CFR) to allow flightcrew training and checking to be
conducted in a De Havilland DHC-8-200 series simulator and operate the
Dash-8-100 series aircraft.

[FR Doc. 2021-18793 Filed 8-31-21; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910-13-P


[Federal Register Volume 83, Number 197 (Thursday, October 11, 2018)]
[Notices]
[Pages 51455-51456]
[FR Doc No: 2018-22073]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission

[Project No. 5038-001]

Notice of Application Accepted for Filing and Soliciting
Comments, Motions To Intervene, Protests, Recommendations, and Terms
and Conditions; Boise Project Board of Control

    Take notice that the following hydroelectric application has been
filed with the Commission and is available for public inspection:
    a. Type of Application: Amendment of Conduit Exemption.
    b. Project No.: 5038-001.
    c. Date filed: May 10 and 17, 2018, September 17 and 24, 2018, and
October 3, 2018.
    d. Applicant: Boise Project Board of Control.
    e. Name of Project: Main Canal No. 6 Hydroelectric Project.
    f. Location: The project is located on the applicant's irrigation
canal system, near the town of Kuna, in Ada County, Idaho. The project,
in part, occupies federal lands administered by the U.S. Bureau of
Reclamation.
    g. Filed Pursuant to: Federal Power Act 16 U.S.C. 791a-825r.
    h. Applicant Contact: Mr. Tim Page, Manager, Boise Project Board of
Control, 2465 Overland Road, Boise, ID 83705, phone<PHONE_NUMBER>.
    i. FERC Contact: Christopher Chaney,<PHONE_NUMBER> or
[email protected].
    j. Deadline for filing responsive documents: Due to the small size
of the proposed project, as well as the resource agency consultation
letters filed with the application, the 60-day timeframe specified in
18 CFR 4.34(b) for filing all comments, motions to intervene, protests,
recommendations, terms and conditions, and prescriptions is shortened
to 30 days from the issuance date of this notice. All reply comments
must be filed with the Commission within 45 days from the issuance date
of this notice.
    The Commission strongly encourages electronic filing. Please file
comments, motions to intervene, and protests using the Commission's
eFiling system at http://www.ferc.gov/docs-filing/efiling.asp.
Commenters can submit brief comments up to 6,000 characters, without
prior registration, using the eComment system at http://www.ferc.gov/docs-filing/ecomment.asp. You must include your name and contact
information at the end of your comments. For assistance, please contact
FERC Online Support at [email protected],<PHONE_NUMBER> (toll
free), or<PHONE_NUMBER> (TTY). In lieu of electronic filing, please
send a paper copy to: Secretary, Federal Energy Regulatory Commission,
888 First Street NE, Washington, DC 20426. The first page of any filing
should include docket number P-5038-001.
    The Commission's Rules of Practice and Procedure require all
intervenors filing documents with the Commission to serve a copy of
that document on each person on the official service list for the
project. Further, if an intervenor files comments or documents with the
Commission relating to the merits of an issue that may affect the
responsibilities of a particular resource agency, it must also serve a
copy of the document on that resource agency.
    k. Description of Project: The proposed amendment consists of the
following changes to the previously authorized, but unconstructed
project: (1) Increase the hydraulic capacity from 350 cubic feet per
second (cfs) to 700 cfs; (2) increase the authorized installed capacity
from 1,200 kilowatts (kW) to 2,300 kW; (3) move the intake structure
approximately 400 feet downstream; (4) reduce the penstock length from
2,300 feet to 1,770 feet and increase its diameter from 72 inches to
120 inches; (5) move the powerhouse approximately 150 feet to the
northeast; (6) decrease the number of units from three to two turbines
connected to a single generator; and (7) excavating a tailrace and
relocating the discharge point approximately 100 feet downstream.
    l. Locations of the Application: A copy of the application is
available for inspection and reproduction at the Commission's Public
Reference Room, located at 888 First Street NE, Room 2A, Washington, DC
20426, or by calling<PHONE_NUMBER>. This filing may also be viewed on
the Commission's website at http://www.ferc.gov/docs-filing/elibrary.asp. Enter the docket number, P-5038, in the docket number
field to access the document. You may also register online at http://www.ferc.gov/docs-filing/esubscription.asp to be notified via email of
new filings and issuances related to this or other pending projects.
For assistance, call 1-866-208-3676 or email
[email protected], for TTY, call<PHONE_NUMBER>. A copy is
also available for inspection and reproduction at the address in item
(h) above.
    m. Comments, Protests, or Motions to Intervene: Anyone may submit
comments, a protest, or a motion to intervene in accordance with the
requirements of Rules of Practice and Procedure, 18 CFR 385.210, .211,
and .214. In determining the appropriate action to take, the Commission
will consider all protests or other comments filed, but only those who
file a motion to intervene in accordance with the Commission's Rules
may become a party to the proceeding. Any comments, protests, or
motions to intervene must be received on or before the specified
deadline date for the particular application.
    n. Filing and Service of Responsive Documents: Any filing must (1)
bear in all capital letters the title COMMENTS, PROTEST, MOTION TO
INTERVENE, REPLY COMMENTS, RECOMMENDATIONS, TERMS AND CONDITIONS, or
PRESCRIPTIONS; (2) set forth in the heading, the name of the applicant
and the project number of the application to which the filing responds;
(3) furnish the name, address, and telephone number of the person
protesting or intervening; and (4) otherwise comply with the
requirements of 18 CFR 385.2001 through 385.2005. All comments, motions
to intervene, or protests must set forth their evidentiary

basis and otherwise comply with the requirements of 18 CFR 4.34(b).
Agencies may obtain copies of the application directly from the
applicant. A copy of any protest or motion to intervene must be served
upon each representative of the applicant specified in the particular
application. If an intervener files comments or documents with the
Commission relating to the merits of an issue that may affect the
responsibilities of a particular resource agency, they must also serve
a copy of the document on that resource agency. A copy of all other
filings in reference to this application must be accompanied by proof
of service on all persons listed in the service list prepared by the
Commission in this proceeding, in accordance with 18 CFR 4.34(b) and
385.2010.

    Dated: October 4, 2018.
Kimberly D. Bose,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2018-22073 Filed 10-10-18; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6717-01-P


[Federal Register: April 22, 2010 (Volume 75, Number 77)]
[Notices]
[Page 20988]
[DOCID:fr22ap10-41]

=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission

[Project No. 13667-000]

City of Sandpoint; Notice of Preliminary Permit Application
Accepted for Filing and Soliciting Comments, Motions To Intervene, and
Competing Applications

April 15, 2010.
    On February 26, 2010, and revised April 9, 2010, the City of
Sandpoint filed an application for a preliminary permit, pursuant to
section 4(f) of the Federal Power Act, proposing to study the
feasibility of the Little Sand Creek Hydroelectric Project located on
Little Sand Creek in Bonner County, Idaho. The existing dam is owned
and operated by the City of Sandpoint. The sole purpose of a
preliminary permit, if issued, is to grant the permit holder priority
to file a license application during the permit term. A preliminary
permit does not authorize the permit holder to perform any land-
disturbing activities or otherwise enter upon lands or waters owned by
others without the owners' express permission.
    The proposed project would consist of the following: (1) An
existing 50-foot-long, 30-foot-high concrete gravity dam; (2) a 0.15-
acre reservoir; (3) an existing 2,500-foot-long 18-inch diameter steel
intake pipe running from the dam to the water treatment plant will act
as the project's penstock; (4) a powerhouse next to the water treatment
plant containing a Pelton turbine and a 65-kilowatt generator; and (5)
appurtenant facilities.
    Applicant Contact: Matthew Mulder, Assistant City Engineer, City of
Sandpoint, 1123 Lake Street, Sandpoint, ID 83864; phone: (208) 263-
3471.
    FERC Contact: Joseph C. Adamson,<PHONE_NUMBER>.
    Deadline for filing comments, motions to intervene, competing
applications (without notices of intent), or notices of intent to file
competing applications: 60 days from the issuance of this notice.
Competing applications and notices of intent must meet the requirements
of 18 CFR 4.36. Comments, motions to intervene, notices of intent, and
competing applications may be filed electronically via the Internet.
See 18 CFR 385.2001(a)(1)(iii) and the instructions on the Commission's
Web site (http://www.ferc.gov/docs-filing/ferconline.asp) under the
``eFiling'' link. For a simpler method of submitting text only
comments, click on ``Quick Comment.'' For assistance, please contact
FERC Online Support at<EMAIL_ADDRESS>call toll-free at
(866) 208-3676; or, for TTY, contact<PHONE_NUMBER>. Although the
Commission strongly encourages electronic filing, documents may also be
paper-filed. To paper-file, mail an original and eight copies to:
Kimberly D. Bose, Secretary, Federal Energy Regulatory Commission, 888
First Street, NE., Washington, DC 20426.
    More information about this project, including a copy of the
application, can be viewed or printed on the ``eLibrary'' link of
Commission's Web site at http://www.ferc.gov/docs-filing/elibrary.asp.
Enter the docket number (P-13667-000) in the docket number field to
access the document. For assistance, contact FERC Online Support.

Kimberly D. Bose,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2010-9262 Filed 4-21-10; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6717-01-P


SF-83 SUPPORTING STATEMENT

                                      ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY

NESHAP for Refractory Products Manufacturing (40 CFR part 63, subpart
SSSSS)

1.  Identification of the Information Collection

	1(a)  Title of the Information Collection

NESHAP for Refractory Products Manufacturing (40 CFR part 63, subpart
SSSSS) (Renewal)

	1(b)  Short Characterization/Abstract

The National Emission Standards for Hazardous Air Pollutants (NESHAP),
for Refractory Products Manufacturing were proposed on June 20, 2002,
(67 FR 42107), and promulgated on April 16, 2003, (68 FR 18729).  These
regulations apply to each existing refractory products manufacturing
which produces refractory bricks, refractory shapes, kiln furniture,
crucibles, and other materials used as linings for boilers, kilns, and
other processing units and equipment where extremes of temperature,
corrosions, and abrasion would destroy other materials.  The rule
applies to facilities that manufacture refractory products and use
organic hazardous air pollutant (HAP), chromium refractory, and clay
refractory products.  The new or reconstructed affected sources are
shape dryers, curing ovens, and kilns that are used to manufacture
refractory products that use organic HAP; shape preheaters, pitch
working tanks, defumers, and coking ovens used to produce
pitch-impregnated refractory products; kilns that are used to
manufacture chromium refractory products; and kilns that are used to
manufacture clay refractory products.  This ICR is for Hazardous Air
Pollutant (HAP) emission major sources in the refractory products
manufacturing source category.

	In general, all NESHAP standards require initial notifications,
compliance status report, and performance tests by the owners/operators
of the affected facilities.  They are also required to maintain records
of the occurrence and duration of any startup, shutdown, or malfunction
(SSM) in the operation of an affected facility, or any period during
which the monitoring system is inoperative.  These notifications,
reports, and records are essential in determining compliance, and are
required of all affected facilities subject to NESHAP.  Semiannual
summary reports are also required.

	Any owner/operator subject to the provisions of this part shall
maintain a file of these measurements, and retain the file for at least
five years following the date of such measurements, maintenance reports,
and records.  All reports are sent to the delegated state or local
authority.  In the event that there is no such delegated authority, the
reports are sent directly to the United States Environmental Protection
Agency (EPA) regional office.

	Based on our consultations with industry representatives, there is an
average of one affected facility at each plant site and that each plant
site has only one respondent (i.e., the owner/operator of the plant
site).

	An average of eight respondents will be subject to the regulation over
the period covered by this ICR, and it is estimated that no additional
respondents will become subject to the regulation in the next three
years.

The Office of Management and Budget (OMB) approved the current
Information Collection Request (ICR) without any “Terms of
Clearance.”

2.  Need for and Use of the Collection

	2(a)  Need/Authority for the Collection

The EPA is charged under Section 112 of the Clean Air Act, as amended,
to establish standards of performance for each category or subcategory
of major sources and area sources of hazardous air pollutants.  These
standards are applicable to new or existing sources of hazardous air
pollutants and shall require the maximum degree of emission reduction.
In addition, section 114(a) states that the Administrator may require
any owner/operator subject to any requirement of this Act to:

(A) Establish and maintain such records; (B) make such reports; (C)
install, use, and maintain such monitoring equipment, and use such audit
procedures, or methods; (D) sample such emissions (in accordance with
such procedures or methods, at such locations, at such intervals, during
such periods, and in such manner as the Administrator shall prescribe);
(E) keep records on control equipment parameters, production variables
or other indirect data when direct monitoring of emissions is
impractical; (F) submit compliance certifications in accordance with
Section 114(a)(3); and (G) provide such other information as the
Administrator may reasonably require.

In the Administrator's judgment, particulate matter emissions from
facilities in refractory products manufacturing cause or contribute to
air pollution that may reasonably be anticipated to endanger public
health or welfare.  Therefore, the NESHAP were promulgated for the
source category at 40 CFR part 63, subpart SSSSS.

	2(b)  Practical Utility/Users of the Data

	The recordkeeping and reporting requirements in the standard ensure
compliance with the applicable regulations which were promulgated in
accordance with the Clean Air Act.  The collected information is also
used for targeting inspections and as evidence in legal proceedings.

Performance tests are required in order to determine an affected
facility’s initial capability to comply with the emission standard.
Continuous emission monitors are used to ensure compliance with the
standard at all times.  During the performance test a record of the
operating parameters under which compliance was achieved may be recorded
and used to determine compliance in place of a continuous emission
monitor.

	The notifications required in the standard are used to inform the
Agency or delegated

authority when a source becomes subject to the requirements of the
regulations.  The reviewing authority may then inspect the source to
check if the pollution control devices are properly installed and
operated, that leaks are being detected and repaired, and that the
standards are being met.  The performance test may also be observed.

	The required semiannual reports are used to determine periods of excess
emissions, identify problems at the facility, verify
operation/maintenance procedures and for compliance determinations.

3.  Nonduplication, Consultations, and Other Collection Criteria

	The requested recordkeeping and reporting are required under 40 CFR
part 63, subpart SSSSS.

	3(a)  Nonduplication

	If the subject standards have not been delegated, the information is
sent directly to the appropriate EPA regional office.  Otherwise, the
information is sent directly to the delegated state or local agency.  If
a state or local agency has adopted its own similar standards to
implement the Federal standards, a copy of the report submitted to the
state or local agency can be sent to the Administrator in lieu of the
report required by the Federal standards.  Therefore, no duplication
exists.

	3(b)  Public Notice Required Prior to ICR Submission to OMB

	An announcement of a public comment period for the renewal of this ICR
was published in the Federal Register (70 FR 24020) on May 6, 2005.  No
comments were received on the burden published in the Federal Register.

	3(c)  Consultations

	Consultation with an industry representative (i.e., respondent) was
conducted to determine if there is anyway for EPA to reduce the
recordkeeping and reporting burden or improve the language in the
standard to make it easier to comply.  Our contact was Mr. Todd Hertzog
from LWB Refractories Company, at<PHONE_NUMBER>.

	We also referenced the most recent ICR, consulted with the preparer of
the active ICR, and used other resources to obtain the most recent data
available.  We reviewed information available from the United States
Census Bureau, the AIRS Facility Subsystem (AFS), which is the primary
source of information regarding the number of existing sources, and
websites covering refractory products manufacturing.  We also consulted
with EPA's Office of Air Quality Planning and Standards, Information
Transfer and Program Integration Division.

3(d)  Effects of Less Frequent Collection

	Less frequent information collection would decrease the margin of
assurance that facilities are continuing to meet the standards.
Requirements for information gathering and recordkeeping are useful
techniques to ensure that good operation and maintenance practices are
applied and that emission limitations are met.  If the information
required by these standards was collected less frequently, the
likelihood of detecting poor operation and maintenance of control
equipment and noncompliance would decrease.

	3(e)  General Guidelines

	None of these reporting or recordkeeping requirements violate any of
the regulations established by OMB at 5 CFR part 1320, section 1320.5.

	These standards require the respondents to maintain all records,
including reports and notifications for at least five years.  This is
consistent with the General Provisions as applied to the standards.  EPA
believes that the five year records retention requirement is consistent
with the Part 70 permit program and the five year statute of limitations
on which the permit program is based.  Also, the retention of records
for five years would allow EPA to establish the compliance history of a
source and any pattern of compliance for purposes of determining the
appropriate level of enforcement action.  Historically, EPA has found
that the most flagrant violators frequently have violations extending
beyond the five years.  If records were retained for less than five
years, EPA would be prevented from pursuing the worst violators due to
the destruction or nonexistence of records.

	3(f)  Confidentiality

	Any information submitted to the Agency for which a claim of
confidentiality is made will be safeguarded according to the Agency
policies set forth in Title 40, Chapter 1, part 2, subpart B -
Confidentiality of Business Information (see 40 CFR 2; 41 FR 36902,
September 1, 1976; amended by 43 FR 40000, September 8, 1978; 43 FR
42251, September 20, 1978; 44 FR 17674, March 23, 1979).

	3(g)  Sensitive Questions

	None of the reporting or recordkeeping requirements contain sensitive
questions.

4.  The Respondents and the Information Requested

	4(a)  Respondents/SIC Codes

The respondents to the recordkeeping and reporting requirements are
refractory products manufacturing.  The United States Standard
Industrial Classification (SIC) codes for the

respondents affected by the standards, which corresponds to the North
American Industry Classification System (NAICS) codes, are listed below
for source category descriptions.

Standard (40 CFR Part 63, Subpart JJJJ)	SIC Codes	NAICS Codes

Clay refractory manufacturing	3255	327124

Nonclay refractory manufacturing	3297	327125

	4(b)  Information Requested

	None of these reporting or recordkeeping requirements violate any of
the regulations established by OMB at 5 CFR part 1320, section 1320.5.

		(i)  Data Items

All data in this ICR that are recorded and/or reported are required by
NESHAP for Refractory Products Manufacturing (40 CFR part 63, subpart
SSSSS).

	A source must make the following reports:

Notifications	Standard Citation by Sections

Initial notification	63.9(b)(2) and (3), 63.5, 63.9812(b)-(c)

Notification of performance test	63.7(b)-(c), 63.9(e), and 63.9812(d)

Notification of compliance status	63.9(h), 63.10(d)(2), and 63.9812(e)

Notification of alternative fuel use	63.9812(f)

Startup, shutdown, malfunction	63.10(d)(5), 63.9814(c)(4)

No deviations/no continuous monitoring system (CMS) out of control
63.9814(c)(5)-(6)

Deviations/out of control CMS	63.9814(d)-(f)

Report of alternative fuel use	63.9841(g)

	A source must make the following reports:

Recordkeeping

Record of startup, shutdown, and malfunctions	63.6(e)(3), 63.10(b)(2),
63.9816(a)(2)

Records of performance tests	63.10(b)(2)(viii), 63.9816(a)(3)

Initial notification or notification of compliance status
63.10(b)(2)(xiv), 63.9816(a)(1)

Record of each CMS	63.8(d)(3), 63.8(f)(6)(i), 63.8(g),
63.10(b)(2)(vi)-(xi), and 63.9816(c)

Records are required to be retained for five years	63.10(b)(1)

Electronic Reporting

	At the present, respondents are using monitoring equipment that
automatically records parameter data.  Although personnel at the
affected facility must evaluate the data, this internal automation has
significantly reduced the burden associated with monitoring and
recordkeeping at the plant site.

	Also, regulatory agencies in cooperation with the respondents continue
to create reporting systems to transmit data electronically.  However,
electronic reporting systems are still not widely used.  At this time,
it is estimated that approximately 10 percent of the respondents use
electronic reporting.

		(ii)  Respondent Activities

Respondent Activities

Read instructions.

Perform initial performance test, Reference Methods 25A test, and repeat
performance tests if necessary.

Write the notifications and reports listed above.

Enter information required to be recorded above.

Submit the required reports developing, acquiring, installing, and
utilizing technology and systems for the purpose of collecting,
validating, and verifying information.

Develop, acquire, install, and utilize technology and systems for the
purpose of processing and maintaining information.

Develop, acquire, install, and utilize technology and systems for the
purpose of disclosing and providing information.

Train personnel to be able to respond to a collection of information.

Transmit, or otherwise disclose the information.

	Currently, sources are using automated monitoring equipment that
provides parameter data.  Although personnel at the sources still need
to evaluate the data, this type of monitoring equipment has
significantly reduced the burden associated with monitoring and
recordkeeping.

5.  The Information Collected: Agency Activities, Collection
Methodology, and Information Management

	5(a)  Agency Activities

	EPA conducts the following activities in connection with the
acquisition, analysis, storage, and distribution of the required
information.

Agency Activities

Observe initial performance tests and repeat performance tests if
necessary.

Review notifications and reports, including performance test reports,
and excess emissions reports, required to be submitted by industry.

Audit facility records.

Input, analyze, and maintain data in the AIRS Facility Subsystem (AFS).

	5(b)  Collection Methodology and Management

	Following notification of startup, the reviewing authority might
inspect the source to determine whether the pollution control devices
are properly installed and operated.  Performance test reports are used
by the Agency to discern a source’s initial capability to comply with
the emission standard.  Data and records maintained by the respondents
are tabulated and published for use in compliance and enforcement
programs.

	Information contained in the reports is entered into the AFS which is
operated and maintained by EPA's Office of Compliance.  AFS is EPA’s
database for the collection, maintenance, and retrieval of compliance
data for approximately 125,000 industrial and government-owned
facilities.  EPA uses the AFS for tracking air pollution compliance and
enforcement by local and state regulatory agencies, EPA regional offices
and EPA headquarters.  EPA and its delegated Authorities can edit,
store, retrieve and analyze the data.

	The records required by this regulation must be retained by the
owner/operator for five years.

	5(c)  Small Entity Flexibility

	A majority of the respondents are large entities (i.e., large
businesses).  However, the impact on small entities (i.e., small
businesses) was taken into consideration during the development of the
regulation.  Due to technical considerations involving the process
operations and the types of control equipment employed, the
recordkeeping and reporting requirements are the same for both small and
large entities.  The Agency considers these requirements the minimum
needed to ensure compliance and, therefore, cannot reduce them further
for small entities.  To the extent that larger businesses can use
economies of scale to reduce their burden, the overall burden will be
reduced.

	5(d)  Collection Schedule

The specific frequency for each information collection activity within
this request is shown in Table 1: Annual Industry Burden for NESHAP for
Refractory Products Manufacturing (40 CFR part 63, subpart SSSSS.)

6.  Estimating the Burden and Cost of the Collection

	Table 1 documents the computation of individual burdens for the
recordkeeping and

reporting requirements applicable to the industry for the subpart
included in this ICR.  The individual burdens are expressed under
standardized headings believed to be consistent with the concept of
burden under the Paperwork Reduction Act.  Where appropriate, specific
tasks and major assumptions have been identified.  Responses to this
information collection are mandatory.  The Agency may not conduct or
sponsor, and a person is not required to respond to, a collection of
information unless it displays a currently valid OMB Control Number.

	6(a)  Estimating Respondent Burden

	The average annual burden to industry over the next three years from
these recordkeeping and reporting requirements is estimated to be 470
(Total Labor Hours from Table 1).  These hours are based on Agency
studies and background documents from the development of this
regulation, Agency knowledge and experience with the NESHAP program, the
previously approved ICR, and any comments received.

	6(b)  Estimating Respondent Costs

		(i)  Estimating Labor Costs

	This ICR uses the following labor rates:

		Managerial	$97.46   ($46.41 + 110%)

		Technical	$83.71   ($39.86 + 110%)

		Clerical	$42.55   ($20.26 + 110%)

	These rates are from the United States Department of Labor, Bureau of
Labor Statistics, March 19, 2005, “Table 2. Civilian Workers, by
occupational and industry group.”  The rates are from column 1,
“Total compensation.”  The rates have been increased by 110 percent
to account for the benefit packages available to those employed by
private industry.

		(ii)  Estimating Capital/Startup and Operation and Maintenance Costs

	The type of industry costs associated with the information collection
activities in the subject standard are labor costs which are addressed
elsewhere in this ICR and the costs associated with continuous
monitoring.  The capital/startup costs are one time costs when a
facility becomes subject to the regulation.  The annual operation and
maintenance costs are the ongoing costs to maintain the monitor and
other costs such as photocopying and postage.

(iii)  Capital/Startup vs. Operation and Maintenance (O&M) Costs

Capital/Startup vs. Operation and Maintenance (O&M) Costs

(A)

Continuous Monitoring Device	(B)

Capital/Startup Cost for One Respondent	(C)

Number of New Respondents 	(D)

Total Capital/Startup Cost,

(B X C)	(E)

Annual O&M Costs for One Respondent	(F)

Number of Respondents with O&M	(G)

Total O&M,

(E X F)

Continuous parameter monitoring system	$16,820	0	$0	$380	8	$3,040

The total capital/startup costs for this ICR are zero.  This is the
total of column D in the above table.  These costs are shown on the OMB
83-I form in block 14(a), Total annualized capital/startup costs.

The total operation and maintenance (O&M) costs for this ICR are $3,040.
 This is the total of column G.  These costs are shown on the OMB 83-I
form in block 14(b), Total annual costs (O&M).

The total respondent costs in block 14 have been calculated as the
addition of the capital/startup costs, and the annual operation and
maintenance costs.  The average annual cost for capital/startup and
operation and maintenance costs to industry over the next three years of
the ICR is estimated to be $3,000 (rounded).  This cost is shown on the
OMB 83-I form in block 14(c), Total annualized cost requested.  The
numbers in block 14 of the OMB 83-I form are rounded to show the cost in
thousands of dollars.

	6(c)  Estimating Agency Burden and Cost

	The only costs to the Agency are those costs associated with analysis
of the reported information.  EPA's overall compliance and enforcement
program includes activities such as the examination of records
maintained by the respondents, periodic inspection of sources of
emission, and the publication and distribution of collected information.

	The average annual Agency cost during the three years of the ICR is
estimated to be $7,273.  This cost is based on the average hourly labor
rate as follows:

		Managerial	$56.02   (GS-13, Step 5, $35.01 x 1.6)

		Technical	$41.57   (GS-12, Step 1, $25.98 x 1.6)

		Clerical	$22.50   (GS-6, Step 3, $14.06 x 1.6)

These rates are from the Office of Personnel Management (OPM) “2005
General

Schedule” which excludes locality rates of pay.  Details upon which
this estimate is based appear in Table 2: Average Annual EPA Burden,
NESHAP for Refractory Products Manufacturing (40 CFR part 63, subpart
SSSSS).

	6(d)  Estimating the Respondent Universe and Total Burden and Costs

	Based on our research for this ICR, on average over the next three
years, approximately eight existing respondents will be subject to the
standard.  It is estimated that no additional respondent per year will
become subject.  The overall average number of respondents, as shown in
the table below is eight per year.

	The number of respondents is calculated using the following table which
addresses the three years covered by this ICR.

Number of Respondents

	Respondents That Submit Reports	Respondents That Do Not Submit Any
Reports

	Year	(A)

Number of New Respondents	(B)

Number of Existing Respondents	(C)

Number of Existing Respondents That Keep Records but Do Not Submit
Reports	(D)

Number of Existing Respondents That Are Also New Respondents	(E)

Number of Respondents(E=A+B+C-D)

1	0	8	0	0	8

2	0	8	0	0	8

3	0	8	0	0	8

Average	0	8	0	0	8

	To avoid double-counting respondents, column D is subtracted.  As shown
above, the average Number of Respondents over the three-year period of
this ICR is eight.  This number appears on the OMB 83-I form in block
13(a), Number of respondents.

	The total number of annual responses per year is calculated using the
following table:

Total Annual Responses

(A)

Information Collection Activity	(B)

Number of Respondents	(C)

Number of Responses	(D)

Number of Existing Respondents That Keep Records But Do Not Submit
Reports	(E)

Total Annual Responses

E=(BxC)+D

Notification of applicability	0	1	0	0

Notification of construction/reconstruction	0	1	0	0

Notification of anticipated startup	0	1	0	0

Notification of actual startup	0	1	0	0

Notification of performance test	0	1	0	0

Notification of compliance status	0	1	0	0

Notification of intent to use alternative fuel	3	1	0	3

Report of deviations	1	1	0	1

Report of no deviations	7	2	0	14

Startup, shutdown, malfunction report	1	1	0	1

Report of alternative fuel use	3	1	0	3

	Total	22

	The number of Total Annual Responses is 22.  This number is shown on
the OMB 83-I form in block 13(b), Total annual responses.

	6(e)  Bottom Line Burden Hours Burden and Cost Tables

	The detailed bottom line burden hours and cost calculations for the
respondents and the Agency are shown in Tables 1 and 2, respectively,
and summarized below.

		(i) Respondent Tally

The Total Hours Requested is shown on the OMB 83-I form in block 13(c).
The total annual labor costs are $27,304.  The annual labor costs are
not shown on the OMB 83-I form.  Details regarding these estimates may
be found in Table 1. Annual Respondent Burden and Cost, NESHAP for
Refractory Products Manufacturing (40 CFR part 63, subpart SSSSS).
Furthermore, the annual public reporting and recordkeeping burden for
this collection of information is estimated to average 21 hours per
response.

	The total annual capital/startup and O&M costs to the regulated entity
are $3,000 (rounded).  This number is shown on the OMB 83-I form in
block 14(c), Total annualized cost requested.  The cost calculations are
detailed in Section 6(b)(iii), Capital/Startup vs. Operation and
Maintenance (O&M) Costs.

		(ii) The Agency Tally

The average annual Agency burden and cost over the next three years is
estimated to be 179 labor hours at a cost of $7,273.  See Table 2.
Annual Agency Burden and Cost, NESHAP for Refractory Products
Manufacturing (40 CFR part 63, subpart SSSSS).

	6(f)  Reasons for Change in Burden

	The decrease in burden from the most recently approved ICR is due to
the requirements of the rule.  All existing sources must be in
compliance within three years of promulgation date.  Fewer burdens are
imposed on existing sources after achieving compliance.  Also, there are
no new sources expected over the three years of this ICR.

There was also a decrease in the capital/startup and operations and
maintenance (O&M) costs from the previous ICR.  There was an increase in
the O&M costs to account for eight sources.  The decrease was due to the
fact that there are no new sources that would incur capital/startup
costs over the next three years.

	6(g)  Burden Statement

	The annual public reporting and recordkeeping burden for this
collection of information is estimated to average 21 hours per response.
 Burden means the total time, effort, or financial resources expended by
persons to generate, maintain, retain, or disclose or provide
information to or for a Federal agency.  This includes the time needed
to review instructions; develop, acquire, install, and utilize
technology and systems for the purposes of collecting, validating, and
verifying information, processing and maintaining information, and
disclosing and providing information; adjust the existing ways to comply
with any previously applicable instructions and requirements; train
personnel to be able to respond to a collection of information; search
data sources; complete and review the collection of information; and
transmit or otherwise disclose the information.

An agency may not conduct or sponsor, and a person is not required to
respond to, a collection of information unless it displays a valid OMB
Control Number.  The OMB Control Numbers for EPA’s regulations are
listed at 40 CFR part 9 and 48 CFR chapter 15.

	To comment on the Agency’s need for this information, the accuracy of
the provided burden estimates, and any suggested methods for minimizing
respondent burden, including the use of automated collection techniques,
EPA has established a public docket for this ICR under Docket ID Number
EPA-HQ-OECA-2005-0022, which is available for online viewing at
www.regulations.gov,  or in person viewing at the Enforcement and
Compliance  Docket and  Information Center in the EPA Docket Center
(EPA/DC),  EPA West, Room B102, 1301 Constitution Avenue, NW,
Washington, DC  The EPA Docket Center Public Reading Room is open from
8:30 a.m. to 4:30 p.m., Monday through Friday, excluding legal holidays.
 The telephone number for the Reading  Room is<PHONE_NUMBER>, and the
telephone number for the Enforcement and Compliance Docket and
Information Center is<PHONE_NUMBER>.  An electronic version of the
public docket is available through EPA Dockets www.regulations.gov.
This site can be used to submit or view public comments, access the
index listing of the contents of the public docket and to access those
documents in the public docket that are available electronically.  When
in the system, select “search,” then key in the Docket ID number
identified above.  You can also send comments to the Office of
Information and Regulatory Affairs, Office of Management and Budget, 725
17th Street, NW, Washington, DC 20503, Attention Desk Officer for EPA.
Please include the EPA Docket Number:  EPA-HQ OECA-2005-0022, and OMB
Control Number 2060-0515 in any correspondence.

Part B of the Supporting Statement

	This part is not applicable because no statistical methods were used in
collecting this information.

Table 1:  Annual Respondent Burden and Cost – NESHAP for Refractory
Products Manufacturing (40 CFR Part 63, Subpart SSSSS)

Burden item

(A)

Person-

hours per

occurrence

(B)

No.  of

occurrences

per respondent

per year

(C)

Person-

hours per

respondent

per year

(C=AxB)

(D)

Respondents

per year  a

(E)

Technical

person-

hours per

year

(E=CxD)

(F)

Management

person-hours

per year

(Ex0.05)

(G)

Clerical

person-

hours per year

(Ex0.1)

(H)

Cost, $  b

1.  Applications	N/A

	2.  Survey and Studies	N/A

	3.  Reporting Requirements

   A.  Read instructions 	0.5	1	4	0	0	0	00	$0

   B.  Required activities

        Startup, shutdown, malfunction plan	32	1	32	0	0	0	0	$0

        Operation, maintenance, monitoring         plan 	32	1	32	0	0	0	0
$0

   C.  Create information	See 3B

	   D.  Gather existing information	See 3B

	   E.   Write report

        Notification of applicability	2	1	2	0	0	0	0	$0

        Notification of construction/                     reconstruction
2	1	2	0	0	0	0	$0

        Notification of anticipated startup 	2	1	2	0	0	0	0	$0

        Notification of actual startup	2	1	2	0	0	0	0	$0

        Notification of performance test 	2	1	2	0	0	0	0	$0

        Notification of compliance status 	16	1	16	0	0	0	0	$0

        Notification of intent to use                       alternative
fuel c	2	1	2	3	6	0.3	0.6	$557.03

        Report of deviations d	16	1	16	1	16	0.8	1.6	$1,485.41

        Report of no deviations e	8	2	16	7	112	5.6	11.2	$10,397.86

        Startup, shutdown, malfunction                 report f	8	1	8	1
8	0.4	0.8	$742.70

        Report of alternative fuel use g	4	1	4	3 	12	0.6	1.2	$1,114.06

4.  Recordkeeping Requirements

    A.  Read instructions h	4	1	4	8	32	1.6	3.2	$2,970.82

    B.  Plan activities	See 4E

	    C.  Implement activities 	See 4E

	    D.  Develop record system	See 4E

    E.  Time to enter information

        Records of all information required          by standards i	0.25
52	13	8	104	5.2	10.4	$9,665.15

    F.  Time to train personnel	20	1	20	0	0	0	0	$0

    G. Time to adjust existing ways to                 comply with
previously applicable            requirements	N/A

	    H. Time to transmit or disclose                      information j
0.25	2	0.5	8	4	0.2	0.4	$371.35

     I. Time for audits 	N/A

	Subtotals Labor Burden and cost

	294	147	29.4	$27,304.38

TOTAL LABOR BURDEN AND COST (rounded)

	470	$27,304

Assumptions:

a  We have assumed that the average number of respondents that will be
subject to the rule will be eight.  There will be no additional new
source per year that will become subject to the rule over the three-year
period of this ICR.

b  This ICR uses the following labor rates: $97.46 per hour for
Executive, Administrative, and Managerial labor; $83.71 per hour for
Technical labor, and $42.55 per hour for Clerical labor.  These rates
are from the United States Department of Labor, Bureau of Labor
Statistics, March 19, 2005, (Table 2. Civilian Workers, by occupational
and industry group.(  The rates are from column 1, (Total compensation.(
 The rates have been increased by 110% to account for the benefit
packages available to those employed by private industry.

c  We have assumed that three respondent will use alternative fuel once
per year and will have to submit notification of intent to use
alternative fuel.

d  We have assumed that one respondent will report deviation once a
year.

e  We have assumed that seven respondents will report no deviation on a
semiannual basis.

f  It is assumed that one respondents will have a startup, shutdown,
malfunction occur.

g  We have assumed that three respondents will report on alternative
fuel usage once a year.

h  We have assumed that it will take 4 hours for each respondent to read
instructions.

i  We have assumed that  information will be recorded once per week for
52 weeks per year.

j  We have assumed that it will take 0.25 hours for information to be
transmitted or disclosed.

Table 2:  Average Annual EPA Burden - NESHAP for Refractory Products
Manufacturing (40 CFR Part 63, Subpart SSSSS)

	Activity

(A)

EPA person-

hours per

occurrence

(B)

No. of

occurrences

per plant

 per year

(C)

EPA person

hours per

plant  per year

(C=AxB)

(D)

Plants per

year  a

(E)

Technical

person-hours

per year

(E=CxD)

(F)

Management

person-hours

per year

(Ex0.05)

(G)

Clerical

person-

hours per year

(Ex0.1)

(H)

Cost, $ b

Attend initial performance test	40	1	40	0	0	0	0	  $0

Attend repeat performance test

    Retesting preparation	8	1	8	0	0	0	0	$0

    Retesting	40	1	40	0	0	0	0	$0

Report Review

    Notification of applicability	2	1	2	0	0	0	0	$0

   Notification of construction/

    reconstruction	2	1	2	0	0	0	0	$0

    Notification of anticipated startup	2	1	2	0	0	0	0	$0

    Notification of actual startup	2	1	2	0	0	0	0	$0

    Notification of initial performance test	2	1	2	0	0	0	0	$0

    Notification of compliance status     	2	1	2	0	0	0	0	$0

    Notification of intent to use alternative     fuel c	2	1	2	3	6	0.3
0.6	$279.73

    Repeat performance test report 	40	1	40	0	0	0	0	$0

    Semiannual compliance reports

         Deviation d	16	1	16	1	16	0.8	1.6	$745.94

         No Deviation e	8	2	16	7	112	5.6	11.2	$5,221.55

    Startup, shutdown, malfunction report f	16	1	16	1	16	0.8	1.6	$745.94

    Notification of alternative fuel use g	2	1	2	3	6	0.3	0.6	$279.73

Subtotals Labor Burden and cost

	156	7.8	15.6	$7,272.89

TOTAL ANNUAL BURDEN AND COST (rounded)

179

$7,273

Assumptions:

a  We have assumed that the average number of respondents that will be
subject to the rule will be eight.  There will be no additional new
source per year that will become subject to the rule over the three-year
period of this ICR.

b  This cost is based on the following labor rates which incorporates a
1.6 benefits multiplication factor to account for government overhead
expenses:  Managerial rate of $56.02 (GS-13, Step 5, $35.01 x 1.6),
Technical rate of $41.57 (GS-12, Step 1, $25.98 x 1.6), and Clerical
rate of $22.50 (GS-6, Step 3, $14.06 x 1.6).  These rates are from the
Office of Personnel Management (OPM) (2005 General Schedule( which
excludes locality rates of pay.

  c  We have assumed that three respondent will use alternative fuel
once per year and will have to submit notification of intent to use
alternative fuel.

  d  We have assumed that one respondent will report deviation once a
year.

  e  We have assumed that seven respondents will report no deviation on
a semiannual basis.

  f  It is assumed that one respondents will have a startup, shutdown,
malfunction occur.

  g  We have assumed that three respondents will report on alternative
fuel usage once a year.

 PAGE   10

 PAGE   9

 PAGE   18

 PAGE   17


[Federal Register Volume 88, Number 152 (Wednesday, August 9, 2023)]
[Notices]
[Page 53929]
[FR Doc No: 2023-17081]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF LABOR

Occupational Safety and Health Administration

[Docket No. OSHA-2014-0022]

Nucor Steel Connecticut Incorporated; Revocation of Permanent
Variance

AGENCY: Occupational Safety and Health Administration (OSHA), Labor.

ACTION: Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: In this notice, OSHA announces the revocation of the April 8,
2016, permanent variance granted to Nucor Steel Connecticut
Incorporated (NSCI), from certain provisions of OSHA's standard that
regulates the control of hazardous energy (lockout/tagout).

DATES: The revocation of the permanent variance specified by this
notice becomes effective on August 9, 2023.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Information regarding this notice is
available from the following sources:
    Press inquiries: Contact Mr. Frank Meilinger, Director, OSHA Office
of Communications, U.S. Department of Labor; telephone:<PHONE_NUMBER>;
email: [email protected].
    General and technical information: Contact Mr. Kevin Robinson,
Director, Office of Technical Programs and Coordination Activities,
Directorate of Technical Support and Emergency Management, Occupational
Safety and Health Administration, U.S. Department of Labor; telephone:
(202) 693-2110; email: [email protected].

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

I. Notice of Revocation of Permanent Variance

    On April 8, 2016, OSHA granted NSCI a Permanent Variance (81 FR
20680), which permitted NSCI to comply with alternative conditions
instead of complying with certain requirements of OSHA's standard for
control of hazardous energy, 29 CFR 1910.147. NSCI notified OSHA by
letter dated May 12, 2023 (OSHA-2014-0022-014), that they are no longer
performing the work activity described in the permanent variance, and
for this reason, are requesting revocation of the permanent variance.
NSCI's letter states that no employee at NSCI is performing the
activity at issue in the variance and NSCI does not anticipate any
employee ever performing this task again. NSCI has certified that they
informed affected employees of the requested revocation of the
permanent variance by posting a copy of the request letter in the
location where notices to employees are normally posted.
    Because NSCI has ceased performing the work activity addressed in
the permanent variance, OSHA hereby revokes the permanent variance
granted to NSCI on April 8, 2016 (86 FR 5253). From the date of
publication of this notice, NSCI may no longer utilize the alternative
control methods described in the permanent variance and need not comply
with any alternative conditions described therein. NSCI must instead
comply with all provisions of the control of hazardous energy (lockout/
tagout) standard, 29 CFR 1910.147, wherever applicable.

II. Authority and Signature

    James S. Frederick, Deputy Assistant Secretary of Labor for
Occupational Safety and Health, 200 Constitution Avenue NW, Washington,
DC 20210, authorized the preparation of this notice. Accordingly, the
agency is issuing this notice pursuant to section 29 U.S.C. 655(6)(d),
Secretary of Labor's Order No. 8-2020 (85 FR 58393; Sept. 18, 2020),
and 29 CFR 1905.13.

    Signed at Washington, DC, on August 3, 2023.
James S. Frederick,
Deputy Assistant Secretary of Labor for Occupational Safety and Health.
[FR Doc. 2023-17081 Filed 8-8-23; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4510-26-P


[Federal Register Volume 79, Number 247 (Wednesday, December 24, 2014)]
[Notices]
[Pages 77594-77595]
[FR Doc No: 2014-30263]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION

Federal Aviation Administration

Membership in the National Parks Overflights Advisory Group
Aviation Rulemaking Committee

AGENCY: Federal Aviation Administration, Transportation.

ACTION: Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) and the National
Park Service (NPS) are inviting interested persons to apply to fill two
existing openings and one upcoming opening on the National Parks
Overflights Advisory Group (NPOAG) Aviation Rulemaking Committee (ARC).
The two existing openings represent environmental concerns and the
upcoming opening represents Native American interests. Selected members
will each serve 3-year terms.

DATES: Persons interested in applying for the NPOAG openings
representing environmental concerns or Native American interests need
to apply by January 30, 2015.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Keith Lusk, Special Programs Staff,
Federal Aviation Administration, Western-Pacific Region Headquarters,
P.O. Box 92007, Los Angeles, CA 90009-2007, telephone:<PHONE_NUMBER>,
email<EMAIL_ADDRESS>
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

Background

    The National Parks Air Tour Management Act of 2000 (the Act) was
enacted on April 5, 2000, as Public Law 106-181. The Act required the
establishment of the advisory group within 1 year after its enactment.
The NPOAG was established in March 2001. The advisory group is
comprised of a balanced group of representatives of general aviation,
commercial air tour operations, environmental concerns, and Native
American tribes. The Administrator of the FAA and the Director of NPS
(or their designees) serve as ex officio members of the group.
Representatives of the Administrator and Director serve alternating 1-
year terms as chairman of the advisory group.
    In accordance with the Act, the advisory group provides ``advice,
information, and recommendations to the Administrator and the Director-
    (1) On the implementation of this title [the Act] and the
amendments made by this title;
    (2) On commonly accepted quiet aircraft technology for use in
commercial air tour operations over a national park or tribal lands,
which will receive preferential treatment in a given air tour
management plan;
    (3) On other measures that might be taken to accommodate the
interests of visitors to national parks; and
    (4) At the request of the Administrator and the Director, safety,
environmental, and other issues related to commercial air tour
operations over a national park or tribal lands.''

Membership

    The NPOAG ARC is made up of one member representing general
aviation, three members representing the commercial air tour industry,
four members representing environmental concerns, and two members
representing Native American interests. Current members of the NPOAG
ARC are as follows:
    The current NPOAG consists of Heidi Williams representing general
aviation; Alan Stephen, Mark Francis, and Matthew Zuccaro representing
commercial air tour operators; Michael Sutton and Dick Hingson
representing environmental interests with two open seats; and Rory
Majenty and Martin Begaye representing Native American interests. Mr.
Majenty's 3-year membership expires on April 2, 2015.

Selection

    In order to retain balance within the NPOAG ARC, the FAA and NPS
are seeking candidates interested in filling the two current open seats
and Mr. Majenty's soon to be expiring seat. The two open seats to be
filled will represent environmental concerns and the one upcoming
opening will represent Native American interests. The FAA and NPS
invite persons interested in representing environmental concerns or
Native American interests on the ARC to contact Mr. Keith Lusk (contact
information is written above in FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT).
Requests to serve on the ARC must be made to Mr. Lusk in writing and
postmarked or emailed on or before January 30, 2015. The request should
indicate whether or not you are a member of an association or group
related to environmental issues or a Native American tribe or have
another affiliation with issues relating to aircraft flights over
national parks. The request should also state what expertise you would
bring to the NPOAG ARC as related to these issues and concerns. The
term of service for NPOAG ARC members is 3 years. Current members may
re-apply for another term.
    On June 18, 2010, President Obama signed a Presidential Memorandum
directing agencies in the Executive Branch not to appoint or re-appoint
federally registered lobbyists to advisory committees and other boards
and commissions. Therefore, before appointing an applicant to serve on
the NPOAG, the FAA and NPS will require the prospective candidate to
certify that they are not a federally registered lobbyist.

    Issued in Hawthorne, CA on December 16, 2014.
Keith Lusk,
Program Manager, Special Programs Staff, Western-Pacific Region.
[FR Doc. 2014-30263 Filed 12-23-14; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910-13-P


[Federal Register Volume 87, Number 113 (Monday, June 13, 2022)]
[Proposed Rules]
[Page 35690]
[FR Doc No: 2022-12637]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION

Federal Aviation Administration

14 CFR Part 71

[Docket No. FAA-2022-0692; Airspace Docket No. 22-ASW-11]
RIN 2120-AA66

Proposed Amendment of the Class E Airspace; Corsicana, TX:
Withdrawal

AGENCY: Federal Aviation Administration (FAA), DOT.

ACTION: Notice of proposed rulemaking (NPRM), withdrawal.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: This action withdraws the NPRM published in the Federal
Register on May 27, 2022, proposing to amend the Class E airspace at
Corsicana, TX. The FAA has determined that withdrawal of the NPRM is
warranted as the action has already been completed by a final rule
published in the Federal Register on February 25, 2022.

DATES: As of June 13, 2022, the proposed rule published in the Federal
Register on May 27, 2022 (87 FR 32104) is withdrawn.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Jeffrey Claypool, Federal Aviation
Administration, Operations Support Group, Central Service Center, 10101
Hillwood Parkway, Fort Worth, TX 76177; telephone<PHONE_NUMBER>.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

History

    An NPRM was published in the Federal Register on May 27, 2022 (87
FR 32104) Docket No. FAA-2022-0692 to amend 14 CFR part 71 by amending
the Class E airspace extending upward from 700 feet above the surface
at C. David Campbell Field-Corsicana Municipal Airport, Corsicana, TX.
Subsequent to publication, the FAA discovered that the proposed action
was completed by a final rule, FR Doc. 2022-03995, published in the
Federal Register on February 25, 2022 (87 FR 10714). Therefore, the FAA
is withdrawing the NPRM.

List of Subjects in 14 CFR Part 71

    Airspace, Incorporation by reference, Navigation (air).

The Withdrawal

0
Accordingly, the notice of proposed rulemaking, Docket No. FAA-2022-
0692, Airspace Docket No. 22-ASW-11, published in the Federal Register
on May 27, 2022 (87 FR 32104), is withdrawn.

    Authority:  49 U.S.C. 106(f), 106(g); 40103, 40113, 40120; E.O.
10854; 24 FR 9565, 3 CFR, 1959-1963 Comp., p. 389.

    Issued in Fort Worth, TX, on June 7, 2022.
Martin A. Skinner,
Acting Manager, Operations Support Group, ATO Central Service Center.
[FR Doc. 2022-12637 Filed 6-10-22; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910-13-P