[Federal Register: April 2, 2010 (Volume 75, Number 63)]
[Notices]
[Page 16895-16896]
[DOCID:fr02ap10-137]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION

National Highway Traffic Safety Administration

Reports, Forms and Record Keeping Requirements; Agency
Information Collection Activity Under OMB Review

AGENCY: National Highway Traffic Safety Administration, Department of
Transportation (NHTSA).

ACTION: Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: In compliance with the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 (44
U.S.C. 3501 et seq.), this notice announces that the Information
Collection Request (ICR) abstracted below has been forwarded to the
Office of Management and Budget (OMB) for review and comment. The ICR
describes the nature of the information collection and the expected
burden. The Federal Register notice with a 60-day comment period was
published on June 22, 2009. This is a request for a new collection.

DATES: Comments must be submitted on or before May 3, 2010.

ADDRESSES: Send comments within 30 days to the Office of Information
and Regulatory Affairs, Office of Management and Budget, 725 17th
Street, NW., Washington, DC 20503, Attention: NHTSA Desk Officer.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Ms. Mary Versailles, Office of
Rulemaking, National Highway Traffic Safety Administration, 1200 New
Jersey Avenue, SE., Washington, DC 20590. Telephone:<PHONE_NUMBER>.
    For legal issues: Ms. Sarah Alves, Office of the Chief Counsel,
National Highway Traffic Safety Administration, 1200 New Jersey Avenue,
SE., Washington, DC 20590.
    Telephone:<PHONE_NUMBER>.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
    Under the procedures established by the Paperwork Reduction Act of
1995 (PRA), a person is not required to respond to a collection of
information by a Federal agency unless the collection displays a valid
OMB control number. The final rule establishes a new consumer
information program at 49 CFR Part 575.106, Tire fuel efficiency
consumer information program. Tire manufacturers would provide data to
NHTSA under a reporting requirement. For this new regulation, NHTSA is
submitting to OMB a request for approval of the following collection of
information.
    In compliance with the PRA, this notice announces that the
Information Collection Request (ICR) abstracted below has been
forwarded to OMB for review and comment. The ICR describes the nature
of the information collections and their expected burden. This is a
request for a new collection.
    Agency: National Highway Traffic Safety Administration (NHTSA).
    Title: 49 CFR Part 575.106, Tire fuel efficiency consumer
information program.
    Type of Request: New collection.
    OMB Clearance Number: Not assigned.
    Form Number: The collection of this information will not use any
standard forms.
    Requested Expiration Date of Approval: Three years from the date of
approval.

Summary of the Collection of Information

    NHTSA is adding a new requirement in Part 575 which would require
tire manufacturers and tire brand name owners to rate all replacement
passenger car tires for fuel efficiency (i.e., rolling resistance),
safety (i.e., wet traction), and durability (i.e., treadwear), and
submit reports to NHTSA regarding the ratings. The ratings for safety
and durability are based on test procedures specified under the UTQGS
traction and treadwear ratings requirements. This information would be
used by consumers of replacement passenger car tires to compare tire
fuel efficiency across different tires and examine any tradeoffs
between fuel efficiency (i.e., rolling resistance), safety (i.e., wet
traction), and durability (i.e., treadwear) in making their purchase
decisions.

Description of the Need for the Information and Use of the Information

    NHTSA needs the information to provide consumers information to
allow them to compare tire fuel efficiency across different tires and
examine any tradeoffs between fuel efficiency (i.e., rolling
resistance), safety (i.e., wet traction), and durability (i.e.,
treadwear) in making their purchase decisions.

Description of the Likely Respondents (Including Estimated Number, and
Proposed Frequency of Response to the Collection of Information)

    There are approximately 28 manufacturers of replacement tires sold
in the United States who would be required to report annually.

Estimate of the Total Annual Reporting and Recordkeeping Burden
Resulting from the Collection of Information

    NHTSA estimates that there are 28 tire manufacturers that will be
required to report. Each of these will need to set up the software in a
computer program to combine the testing information, organize it for
NHTSA's use, etc. We estimate this cost to be a one-time charge of
about $10,000 per company. Based on the costs used in the Early Warning
Reporting Regulation analysis,\1\ we estimate the annual cost per
report per tire manufacturer to be $287. There are also computer
maintenance costs of keeping the data up to date, etc. as tests come in
throughout the year. In the EWR analysis, we estimated costs of $3,755
per year per company. Thus, the total annual cost is estimated to be
$4,042 per company. Thus the total costs would be $280,000 + $113,176 =
$393,176 for the first year and $113,176 as an annual cost for the 28
tire manufacturers.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \1\ Preliminary Regulatory Evaluation, Tread Act Amendments to
Early Warning Reporting Regulation Part 579 and Defect and
Noncompliance Part 573, August 2008 (Docket No. 2008-0169-0007.1).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    The largest portion of the cost burden imposed by the tire fuel
efficiency program arises from the testing necessary to determine the
ratings that should be assigned to the tires. As detailed in our
reponse to question 8, our revised per-SKU costs to test for
rolling resistance, traction, and treadwear amount to $2,040 (i.e. $540
+ $500 + $1,000). This would result in testing costs of $38,760,000 in
the first year (19,000 SKUs) and $6,573,000 in subsequent years (3,222
new SKUs annually).
    The estimated annual cost to the Federal government is $1.28
million. This cost includes $730,000 for enforcement testing, and about
$550,000 annually to set up and keep up to date a website that includes
the information reported to NHTSA.
    Comments are invited on:
     Whether the collection of information is necessary for the
proper performance of the functions of the Department, including
whether the information will have practical utility.
     Whether the Department's estimate for the burden of the
information collection is accurate.
     Ways to minimize the burden of the collection of
information on respondents, including the use of automated collection
techniques or other forms of information technology.
    A comment to OMB is most effective if OMB receives it within 30
days of publication.

    Issued on: March 29, 2010.
Stephen R. Kratzke,
Associate Administrator for Rulemaking.
[FR Doc. 2010-7396 Filed 4-1-10; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE P


[Federal Register: September 15, 2010 (Volume 75, Number 178)]
[Notices]
[Page 56086-56089]
[DOCID:fr15se10-59]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission

Combined Notice of Filings  1

September 07, 2010.
    Take notice that the Commission received the following electric
corporate filings:

    Docket Numbers: EC10-93-000.
    Applicants: Macquarie Infrastructure Partners Inc., MIP II Biopower
LLC.
    Description: Application of Macquarie Infrastructure Partners Inc.
and MIP II Biopower LLC for Authorization Under Section 203 of the FPA.
    Filed Date: 09/02/2010.
    Accession Number: 20100902-5187.
    Comment Date: 5 p.m. Eastern Time on Thursday, September 23, 2010.

    Docket Numbers: EC10-94-000.
    Applicants: Tyr Keenan II, LLC, Tyr Wind, LLC, EFS Keenan II, LLC,
CPV Keenan II Renewable Energy Company.
    Description: Joint Application of CPV Keenan II Renewable Energy
Company, LLC, et al. for Authorization Under FPA Section 203 for
Disposition of Jurisdictional Facilities.
    Filed Date: 09/03/2010.
    Accession Number: 20100903-5227.
    Comment Date: 5 p.m. Eastern Time on Friday, September 24, 2010.

    Take notice that the Commission received the following electric
rate filings:

    Docket Numbers: ER99-3502-011.
    Applicants: Berkshire Power Company, LLC.
    Description: Berkshire Power Company, LLC Notice of Non-Material
Change of Status.
    Filed Date: 09/02/2010.

    Accession Number: 20100902-5109.
    Comment Date: 5 p.m. Eastern Time on Thursday, September 23, 2010.

    Docket Numbers: ER08-912-012; ER07-460-014; ER04-94-024; ER05-1146-
024; ER09-1723-008.
    Applicants: Iberdrola Renewables; Shiloh I Wind Project LLC; Dillon
Wind LLC; Dry Lake Wind Power, LLC.
    Description: Southwest Seller submits supplement to notice of
category 1 of seller status and Order 697 compliance filing.
    Filed Date: 09/03/2010.
    Accession Number: 20100907-0004.
    Comment Date: 5 p.m. Eastern Time on Friday, September 24, 2010.

    Docket Numbers: ER10-1599-001.
    Applicants: Invenergy Cannon Falls LLC.
    Description: Invenergy Cannon Falls LLC submits tariff filing per
35: Supplement to Category 1 Exemption Filing to be effective 11/3/
2010.
    Filed Date: 09/03/2010.
    Accession Number: 20100903-5087.
    Comment Date: 5 p.m. Eastern Time on Friday, September 24, 2010.

    Docket Numbers: ER10-1601-001.
    Applicants: Hardee Power Partners Limited.
    Description: Hardee Power Partners Limited submits tariff filing
per 35: Supplement to Category 1 Exemption Filing to be effective 11/3/
2010.
    Filed Date: 09/03/2010.
    Accession Number: 20100903-5084.
    Comment Date: 5 p.m. Eastern Time on Friday, September 24, 2010.

    Docket Numbers: ER10-1603-001.
    Applicants: Grand Ridge Energy LLC.
    Description: Grand Ridge Energy LLC submits tariff filing per 35:
Supplement to Category 1 Exemption Filing to be effective 11/3/2010.
    Filed Date: 09/03/2010.
    Accession Number: 20100903-5107.
    Comment Date: 5 p.m. Eastern Time on Friday, September 24, 2010.

    Docket Numbers: ER10-1604-001.
    Applicants: Grand Ridge Energy II LLC.
    Description: Grand Ridge Energy II LLC submits tariff filing per
35: Supplement to Category 1 Exemption Filing to be effective 11/3/
2010.
    Filed Date: 09/03/2010.
    Accession Number: 20100903-5071.
    Comment Date: 5 p.m. Eastern Time on Friday, September 24, 2010.

    Docket Numbers: ER10-1605-001.

    Applicants: Grand Ridge Energy III LLC.
    Description: Grand Ridge Energy III LLC submits tariff filing per
35: Supplement to Category 1 Exemption Filing to be effective 11/3/
2010.
    Filed Date: 09/03/2010.
    Accession Number: 20100903-5082.
    Comment Date: 5 p.m. Eastern Time on Friday, September 24, 2010.

    Docket Numbers: ER10-1608-001.
    Applicants: Invenergy TN LLC.
    Description: Invenergy TN LLC submits tariff filing per 35:
Supplement to Category 1 Exemption Filing to be effective 11/3/2010.
    Filed Date: 09/03/2010.
    Accession Number: 20100903-5089.
    Comment Date: 5 p.m. Eastern Time on Friday, September 24, 2010.

    Docket Numbers: ER10-1609-001.
    Applicants: Judith Gap Energy LLC.
    Description: Judith Gap Energy LLC submits tariff filing per 35:
Supplement to Category 1 Exemption Filing to be effective 11/3/2010.
    Filed Date: 09/03/2010.
    Accession Number: 20100903-5098.
    Comment Date: 5 p.m. Eastern Time on Friday, September 24, 2010.

    Docket Numbers: ER10-1610-001.
    Applicants: Wolverine Creek Energy LLC.
    Description: Wolverine Creek Energy LLC submits tariff filing per
35: Supplement to Category 1 Exemption Filing to be effective 11/3/
2010.
    Filed Date: 09/03/2010.
    Accession Number: 20100903-5095.
    Comment Date: 5 p.m. Eastern Time on Friday, September 24, 2010.

    Docket Numbers: ER10-1611-001.
    Applicants: Grays Harbor Energy LLC.
    Description: Grays Harbor Energy LLC submits tariff filing per 35:
Supplement to Category 1 Exemption Filing to be effective 11/3/2010.
    Filed Date: 09/03/2010.
    Accession Number: 20100903-5101.
    Comment Date: 5 p.m. Eastern Time on Friday, September 24, 2010.

    Docket Numbers: ER10-1612-001.
    Applicants: Spring Canyon Energy LLC.
    Description: Spring Canyon Energy LLC submits tariff filing per 35:
Supplement to Category 1 Exemption Filing to be effective 11/3/2010.
    Filed Date: 09/03/2010.
    Accession Number: 20100903-5090.
    Comment Date: 5 p.m. Eastern Time on Friday, September 24, 2010.

    Docket Numbers: ER10-1613-001.
    Applicants: Spindle Hill Energy LLC.
    Description: Spindle Hill Energy LLC submits tariff filing per 35:
Supplement to Category 1 Exemption Filing to be effective 11/3/2010.
    Filed Date: 09/03/2010.
    Accession Number: 20100903-5086.
    Comment Date: 5 p.m. Eastern Time on Friday, September 24, 2010.

    Docket Numbers: ER10-1614-001.
    Applicants: Sheldon Energy LLC.
    Description: Sheldon Energy LLC submits tariff filing per 35:
Supplement to Category 1 Filing to be effective 11/3/2010.
    Filed Date: 09/03/2010.
    Accession Number: 20100903-5070.
    Comment Date: 5 p.m. Eastern Time on Friday, September 24, 2010.

    Docket Numbers: ER10-1615-001.
    Applicants: Willow Creek Energy LLC.
    Description: Willow Creek Energy LLC submits tariff filing per 35:
Supplement to Category 1 Exemption Filing to be effective 11/3/2010.
    Filed Date: 09/03/2010.
    Accession Number: 20100903-5069.
    Comment Date: 5 p.m. Eastern Time on Friday, September 24, 2010.

    Docket Numbers: ER10-1692-001.
    Applicants: California Independent System Operator Corporation.
    Description: California Independent System Operator Corporation
submits tariff filing per 35: 2010-09-03 CAISO CRR Credit Policy
Compliance Filing to be effective 9/1/2010.
    Filed Date: 09/03/2010.
    Accession Number: 20100903-5175.
    Comment Date: 5 p.m. Eastern Time on Friday, September 24, 2010.

    Docket Numbers: ER10-1750-001.
    Applicants: Stream Energy Pennsylvania, LLC.
    Description: Stream Energy Pennsylvania, LLC et al. submits
additional information requested by FERC Staff for Attachments A and B
to the pending market-based rate applications.
    Filed Date: 09/02/2010.
    Accession Number: 20100902-0217.
    Comment Date: 5 p.m. Eastern Time on Thursday, September 23, 2010.

    Docket Numbers: ER10-1751-001.
    Applicants: SGE Energy Sourcing, LLC.
    Description: Stream Energy Pennsylvania, LLC et al. submits
additional information requested by FERC Staff for Attachments A and B
to the pending market-based rate applications.
    Filed Date: 09/02/2010.
    Accession Number: 20100902-0217.
    Comment Date: 5 p.m. Eastern Time on Thursday, September 23, 2010.

    Docket Numbers: ER10-1805-002.
    Applicants: Public Service Company of New Hampshire.
    Description: Public Service Company of New Hampshire submits tariff
filing per 35: Certificate of Concurrence to be effective 7/19/2010.
    Filed Date: 09/03/2010.
    Accession Number: 20100903-5204.
    Comment Date: 5 p.m. Eastern Time on Friday, September 24, 2010.

    Docket Numbers: ER10-1809-001.
    Applicants: RED-Scotia, LLC.
    Description: RED-Scotia, LLC submits tariff filing per 35.17(b):
Supplement to Market-Based Rate Application of RED-Scotia, LLC to be
effective 7/19/2010.
    Filed Date: 09/03/2010.
    Accession Number: 20100903-5187.
    Comment Date: 5 p.m. Eastern Time on Friday, September 24, 2010.

    Docket Numbers: ER10-2120-001.
    Applicants: Virginia Electric and Power Company.
    Description: Virginia Electric and Power Company submits tariff
filing per 35.17(b): Amendment to WMBR Tariff to be effective 6/30/
2010.
    Filed Date: 09/02/2010.
    Accession Number: 20100902-5163.
    Comment Date: 5 p.m. Eastern Time on Thursday, September 23, 2010.

    Docket Numbers: ER10-2522-000.
    Applicants: Top of the World Wind Energy, LLC.
    Description: Top of the World Wind Energy, LLC submits their
Initial Market-Based Rate Application and Tariff Filing, to be
effective 9/3/2010.
    Filed Date: 09/02/2010.
    Accession Number: 20100902-5130.
    Comment Date: 5 p.m. Eastern Time on Thursday, September 23, 2010.

    Docket Numbers: ER10-2523-000.
    Applicants: Midwest Independent Transmission System Operator, Inc.
    Description: Midwest Independent Transmission System Operator, Inc.
submits tariff filing per 35.13(a)(2)(iii): MidAmerican-NIPCO IA to be
effective 9/7/2010.
    Filed Date: 09/02/2010.
    Accession Number: 20100902-5155.
    Comment Date: 5 p.m. Eastern Time on Thursday, September 23, 2010.

    Docket Numbers: ER10-2524-000.
    Applicants: Midwest Independent Transmission System.
    Description: Midwest Independent Transmission System Operator, Inc.
submits tariff filing per 35.13(a)(2)(iii): Cap X-Fargo T-T (SA 2236)
to be effective 9/3/2010.
    Filed Date: 09/02/2010.
    Accession Number: 20100902-5160.
    Comment Date: 5 p.m. Eastern Time on Thursday, September 23, 2010.

    Docket Numbers: ER10-2525-000.
    Applicants: California Independent System Operator Corporation.
    Description: California Independent System Operator Corporation
submits tariff filing per 35: 2010-09-03 CAISO Service Agreement 798 to
be effective 9/1/2010.
    Filed Date: 09/03/2010.
    Accession Number: 20100903-5001.
    Comment Date: 5 p.m. Eastern Time on Friday, September 24, 2010.

    Docket Numbers: ER10-2526-000.
    Applicants: Lighthouse Energy Trading Company, Inc.
    Description: Lighthouse Energy Trading Company, Inc. submits tariff
filing per 35.12: Lighthouse Energy--FERC Electric Tariff, Volume No. 1
to be effective 9/3/2010.
    Filed Date: 09/03/2010.
    Accession Number: 20100903-5015.
    Comment Date: 5 p.m. Eastern Time on Friday, September 24, 2010.

    Docket Numbers: ER10-2527-000.
    Applicants: Allegheny Ridge Wind Farm, LLC.
    Description: Allegheny Ridge Wind Farm, LLC submits tariff filing
per 35.12: Baseline Market-Based Rates to be effective 9/3/2010.
    Filed Date: 09/03/2010.
    Accession Number: 20100903-5060.
    Comment Date: 5 p.m. Eastern Time on Friday, September 24, 2010.

    Docket Numbers: ER10-2528-000.
    Applicants: Aragonne Wind LLC.
    Description: Aragonne Wind LLC submits tariff filing per 35.12:
Baseline Market-Based Rates to be effective 9/3/2010.
    Filed Date: 09/03/2010.
    Accession Number: 20100903-5061.
    Comment Date: 5 p.m. Eastern Time on Friday, September 24, 2010.

    Docket Numbers: ER10-2529-000.
    Applicants: Buena Vista Energy, LLC.
    Description: Buena Vista Energy, LLC submits tariff filing per
35.12: Baseline Market-Based Rates to be effective 9/3/2010.
    Filed Date: 09/03/2010.
    Accession Number: 20100903-5062.
    Comment Date: 5 p.m. Eastern Time on Friday, September 24, 2010.

    Docket Numbers: ER10-2530-000.
    Applicants: Caprock Wind LLC.
    Description: Caprock Wind LLC submits tariff filing per 35.12:
Baseline Market-Based Rates to be effective 9/3/2010.
    Filed Date: 09/03/2010.
    Accession Number: 20100903-5063.
    Comment Date: 5 p.m. Eastern Time on Friday, September 24, 2010.

    Docket Numbers: ER10-2531-000.
    Applicants: Cedar Creek Wind Energy, LLC.
    Description: Cedar Creek Wind Energy, LLC submits tariff filing per
35.12: Baseline Market-Based Rates to be effective 9/3/2010.
    Filed Date: 09/03/2010.
    Accession Number: 20100903-5064.
    Comment Date: 5 p.m. Eastern Time on Friday, September 24, 2010.

    Docket Numbers: ER10-2532-000.
    Applicants: Crescent Ridge LLC.
    Description: Crescent Ridge LLC submits tariff filing per 35.12:
Baseline Market-Based Rates to be effective 9/3/2010.
    Filed Date: 09/03/2010.
    Accession Number: 20100903-5065.
    Comment Date: 5 p.m. Eastern Time on Friday, September 24, 2010.

    Docket Numbers: ER10-2533-000.
    Applicants: GSG, LLC.
    Description: GSG, LLC submits tariff filing per 35.12: Baseline
Market-Based Rates to be effective 9/3/2010.
    Filed Date: 09/03/2010.
    Accession Number: 20100903-5066.
    Comment Date: 5 p.m. Eastern Time on Friday, September 24, 2010.

    Docket Numbers: ER10-2534-000.
    Applicants: Kumeyaay Wind LLC.
    Description: Kumeyaay Wind LLC submits tariff filing per 35.12:
Baseline Market-Based Rates to be effective 9/3/2010.
    Filed Date: 09/03/2010.
    Accession Number: 20100903-5067.
    Comment Date: 5 p.m. Eastern Time on Friday, September 24, 2010.

    Docket Numbers: ER10-2535-000.
    Applicants: Mendota Hills, LLC.
    Description: Mendota Hills, LLC submits tariff filing per 35.12:
Baseline Market-Based Rates to be effective 9/3/2010.
    Filed Date: 09/03/2010.
    Accession Number: 20100903-5068.
    Comment Date: 5 p.m. Eastern Time on Friday, September 24, 2010.

    Docket Numbers: ER10-2536-000.
    Applicants: Westar Energy, Inc.
    Description: Westar Energy, Inc. submits tariff filing per
35.13(a)(2)(iii): Westar Energy, Electric Interconnection Agreement,
Addendum No. 5 to be effective 1/1/2011.
    Filed Date: 09/03/2010.
    Accession Number: 20100903-5074.
    Comment Date: 5 p.m. Eastern Time on Friday, September 24, 2010.

    Docket Numbers: ER10-2537-000.
    Applicants: Midwest Independent Transmission System Operator, Inc.
    Description: Midwest Independent Transmission System Operator, Inc.
submits tariff filing per 35.13(a)(2)(iii): ATSI-FE Nuclear IA to be
effective 9/4/2010.
    Filed Date: 09/03/2010.
    Accession Number: 20100903-5110.
    Comment Date: 5 p.m. Eastern Time on Friday, September 24, 2010.

    Docket Numbers: ER10-2538-000.
    Applicants: Panoche Energy Center, LLC.
    Description: Panoche Energy Center, LLC submits tariff filing per
35.12: Panoche Energy Center, LLC FERC Electric Tariff No. 1 to be
effective 9/3/2010.
    Filed Date: 09/03/2010.

    Accession Number: 20100903-5114.
    Comment Date: 5 p.m. Eastern Time on Friday, September 24, 2010.

    Docket Numbers: ER10-2539-000.
    Applicants: New York Independent System Operator, Inc.
    Description: New York Independent System Operator submits tariff
filing per 35.13(a)(2)(iii): GADS sanctions to be effective 11/3/2010.
    Filed Date: 09/03/2010.
    Accession Number: 20100903-5134.
    Comment Date: 5 p.m. Eastern Time on Friday, September 24, 2010.

    Docket Numbers: ER10-2540-000.
    Applicants: Midwest Independent Transmission System Operator, Inc.
    Description: Midwest Independent Transmission System Operator, Inc.
submits tariff filing per 35.13(a)(2)(iii): NIPSCO-Horizon FCA to be
effective 9/4/2010.
    Filed Date: 09/03/2010.
    Accession Number: 20100903-5171.
    Comment Date: 5 p.m. Eastern Time on Friday, September 24, 2010.

    Docket Numbers: ER10-2541-000.
    Applicants: Maple Analytics, LLC.
    Description: Maple Analytics, LLC submits tariff filing per 35.12:
Maple Analytics, LLC 205 to be effective 10/3/2010.
    Filed Date: 09/03/2010.
    Accession Number: 20100903-5212.
    Comment Date: 5 p.m. Eastern Time on Friday, September 24, 2010.

    Docket Numbers: ER10-2542-000.
    Applicants: New York Independent System Operator.
    Description: New York Independent System Operator submits tariff
filing per 35.13(a)(2)(iii): Site/Interconnection Agreements between
O&R and AER NY-Gen to be effective 9/9/2010.
    Filed Date: 09/03/2010.
    Accession Number: 20100903-5218.
    Comment Date: 5 p.m. Eastern Time on Friday, September 24, 2010.

    Docket Numbers: ER10-2543-000.
    Applicants: Verso Androscoggin LLC.
    Description: Verso Androscoggin LLC submits its baseline tariff
filing FERC Electric Tariff, Volume No. 1, to be effective 9/7/2010.
    Filed Date: 09/07/2010.
    Accession Number: 20100907-5014.
    Comment Date: 5 p.m. Eastern Time on Tuesday, September 28, 2010.

    Docket Numbers: ER10-2544-000.
    Applicants: RMH Energy, LP.
    Description: RMH Energy, LP submits tariff filing per 35.12: RMH
Energy--FERC Electric Tariff Volume No. 1 to be effective 9/7/2010.
    Filed Date: 09/07/2010.
    Accession Number: 20100907-5015.
    Comment Date: 5 p.m. Eastern Time on Tuesday, September 28, 2010.

    Docket Numbers: ER10-2545-000.
    Applicants: Commonwealth Edison Company.
    Description: Commonwealth Edison Company submits filing to add a
new schedule to ComEd's Attachments H913--Attachments H-13C,
Determination of Capacity Peak Contributions and Network Service Peak
Load Contributions, etc.
    Filed Date: 09/03/2010.
    Accession Number: 20100907-0205.
    Comment Date: 5 p.m. Eastern Time on Friday, September 24, 2010.

    Docket Numbers: ER10-2547-000.
    Applicants: PJM Interconnection, LLC.
    Description: PJM Interconnection, LLC submits an executed
interconnection service agreement etc.
    Filed Date: 09/03/2010.
    Accession Number: 20100907-0207.
    Comment Date: 5 p.m. Eastern Time on Friday, September 24, 2010.

    Docket Numbers: ER10-2548-000.
    Applicants: Interstate Power and Light Company.
    Description: Interstate Power and Light Company et al., submits the
proposed Local Balancing Area Operations Coordination Agreement with
Pioneer Prairie Wind, to be effective 9/8/2010.
    Filed Date: 09/07/2010.
    Accession Number: 20100907-5017.
    Comment Date: 5 p.m. Eastern Time on Tuesday, September 28, 2010.

    Docket Numbers: ER10-2549-000.
    Applicants: Kit Carson Windpower, LLC.
    Description: Kit Carson Windpower, LLC submits tariff filing per
35.12: Initial Market Based-Rate Application and Tariff Filing to be
effective 11/7/2010.
    Filed Date: 09/07/2010.
    Accession Number: 20100907-5119.
    Comment Date: 5 p.m. Eastern Time on Tuesday, September 28, 2010.

    Any person desiring to intervene or to protest in any of the above
proceedings must file in accordance with Rules 211 and 214 of the
Commission's Rules of Practice and Procedure (18 CFR 385.211 and
385.214) on or before 5 p.m. Eastern time on the specified comment
date. It is not necessary to separately intervene again in a subdocket
related to a compliance filing if you have previously intervened in the
same docket. Protests will be considered by the Commission in
determining the appropriate action to be taken, but will not serve to
make protestants parties to the proceeding. Anyone filing a motion to
intervene or protest must serve a copy of that document on the
Applicant. In reference to filings initiating a new proceeding,
interventions or protests submitted on or before the comment deadline
need not be served on persons other than the Applicant.
    The Commission encourages electronic submission of protests and
interventions in lieu of paper, using the FERC Online links at http://
www.ferc.gov. To facilitate electronic service, persons with Internet
access who will eFile a document and/or be listed as a contact for an
intervenor must create and validate an eRegistration account using the
eRegistration link. Select the eFiling link to log on and submit the
intervention or protests.
    Persons unable to file electronically should submit an original and
14 copies of the intervention or protest to the Federal Energy
Regulatory Commission, 888 First St., NE., Washington, DC 20426.
    The filings in the above proceedings are accessible in the
Commission's eLibrary system by clicking on the appropriate link in the
above list. They are also available for review in the Commission's
Public Reference Room in Washington, DC. There is an eSubscription link
on the Web site that enables subscribers to receive e-mail notification
when a document is added to a subscribed dockets(s). For assistance
with any FERC Online service, please e-mail<EMAIL_ADDRESS>
or call<PHONE_NUMBER> (toll free). For TTY, call<PHONE_NUMBER>.

Nathaniel J. Davis, Sr.,
Deputy Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2010-22951 Filed 9-14-10; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6717-01-P


[Federal Register Volume 79, Number 4 (Tuesday, January 7, 2014)]
[Notices]
[Page 824]
[FR Doc No: 2014-00015]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission

[ Docket Nos. OR14-17-000]

US Airways, Inc. v. Colonial Pipeline Company; Notice of
Complaint

    Take notice that on December 31, 2013, pursuant to section 1(5), 6,
8, 9, 13, 15, and 16 of the Interstate Commerce Act, 49 U.S.C. App.
1(5), 6, 8, 9, 13, 15 and 16; section 1803 of the Energy Policy Act of
1992; Rule 206 of the Rules of Practice and Procedure of the Federal
Energy Regulatory Commission (Commission), 18 CFR 385.206 (2013); and
Rules 343.1(a) and 343.2(c) of the Commission's Procedural Rules
Applicable to Oil Pipeline Proceedings, 18 CFR 343.1(a) and 343.2(c),
US Airways, Inc. (Complainant) filed a formal complaint against
Colonial Pipeline Company (Respondent), challenging the justness,
reasonableness, and lawfulness of the jurisdictional rates and charges
by the Respondent for transportation of petroleum products, including
aviation kerosene and jet fuel, on its interstate pipeline system, from
all origins to all destinations in the challenged tariffs, as more
fully described in the complaint. US Airways, Inc. further states that
it seeks privileged and confidential treatment of its complaint.
    The Complainant certifies that copies of the complaint were served
on the contacts for the Respondents as listed on the Commission's list
of Corporate Officials.
    Any person desiring to intervene or to protest this filing must
file in accordance with Rules 211 and 214 of the Commission's Rules of
Practice and Procedure (18 CFR 385.211 and 385.214). Protests will be
considered by the Commission in determining the appropriate action to
be taken, but will not serve to make protestants parties to the
proceeding. Any person wishing to become a party must file a notice of
intervention or motion to intervene, as appropriate. The Respondent's
answer and all interventions, or protests must be filed on or before
the comment date. The Respondent's answer, motions to intervene, and
protests must be served on the Complainants.
    The Commission encourages electronic submission of protests and
interventions in lieu of paper using the ``eFiling'' link at http://www.ferc.gov. Persons unable to file electronically should submit an
original and 5 copies of the protest or intervention to the Federal
Energy Regulatory Commission, 888 First Street NE., Washington, DC
20426.
    This filing is accessible on-line at http://www.ferc.gov, using the
``eLibrary'' link and is available for review in the Commission's
Public Reference Room in Washington, DC. There is an ``eSubscription''
link on the Web site that enables subscribers to receive email
notification when a document is added to a subscribed docket(s). For
assistance with any FERC Online service, please email
<EMAIL_ADDRESS>or call<PHONE_NUMBER> (toll free). For
TTY, call<PHONE_NUMBER>.
    Comment Date: 5:00 p.m. Eastern Time on January 30, 2014.

    Dated: December 31, 2013.
Nathaniel J. Davis, Sr.,
Deputy Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2014-00015 Filed 1-6-14; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6717-01-P [FEDREG][VOL]*[/VOL][NO]*[/NO][DATE]*[/
DATE][NOTICES]


[Federal Register: April 9, 2009 (Volume 74, Number 67)]
[Notices]
[Page 16247-16249]
[DOCID:fr09ap09-116]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

[Release No. 34-59701; File No. SR-ISE-2009-15]

Self-Regulatory Organizations; International Securities Exchange,
LLC; Notice of Filing and Immediate Effectiveness of Proposed Rule
Change Relating to Quoting Obligations of Second Market Competitive
Market Makers

April 3, 2009.
    Pursuant to Section 19(b)(1) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934
(the ``Act''),\1\ and Rule 19b-4 thereunder,\2\ notice is hereby given
that on March 25, 2009, the International Securities Exchange, LLC (the
``Exchange'' or the ``ISE'') filed with the Securities and Exchange
Commission the proposed rule change as described in Items I, II, and
III below, which items have been prepared by the self-regulatory
organization. The Commission is publishing this notice to solicit
comments on the proposed rule change from interested persons.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \1\ 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(1).
    \2\ 17 CFR 240.19b-4.

---------------------------------------------------------------------------

I. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement of the Terms of Substance
of the Proposed Rule Change

    The ISE proposes to amend the quoting obligations of Second Market
Competitive Market Makers. The text of the proposed rule change is as
follows, with deletions in [brackets] and additions in italics:
Rule 904. Market Maker Quotes and Orders
    (a) Quotes. Except as provided below, all of the requirements of
Rules 803, 804, and 805 related to quoting obligations of Primary
Market Makers and Competitive Market Makers apply to SMPMMs and SMCMMs
respectively. For purposes of the Rules, SMCMMs are considered
appointed to all of the options classes listed in the Second Market.
    (1) SMCMMs are not required to make markets in a minimum number of
options classes in the Second Market. SMCMMs may choose whether to make
markets in one or more options classes traded in the Second Market on a
daily basis.
    (2) If an SMCMM chooses to make markets in one or more options
classes in the Second Market, it must [participate in the opening
rotation and] make markets and enter into any resulting transactions on
a continuous basis in all of the series of the options class until the
close of trading that day. Further, SMCMMs may [not] initiate quoting
in an additional number of options classes intraday, up to the number
of options classes for which they participated in the opening rotation
on that day.
    (b) No Change.
* * * * *

II. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement of the Purpose of, and
Statutory Basis for, the Proposed Rule Change

    In its filing with the Commission, the self-regulatory organization
included statements concerning the purpose of, and basis for, the
proposed rule change and discussed any comments it received on the
proposed rule change. The text of these statements may be examined at
the places specified in Item IV below. The self-regulatory organization
has prepared summaries, set forth in sections A, B and C below, of the
most significant aspects of such statements.

A. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement of the Purpose of, and
Statutory Basis for, the Proposed Rule Change

1. Purpose
    The purpose of the proposed rule change is to amend the quoting
obligations of Second Market Competitive Market Makers (``SMCMMs'').
Pursuant to Commission approval, ISE currently lists for trading a
number of low-volume options classes that qualify for listing under its
Rule 502 in a ``Second Market.'' \3\ Among other things, the Second
Market has allowed the Exchange to provide an opportunity for
additional members to provide liquidity as market makers. Specifically,
the Second Market trading rules allow SMCMMs to choose whether to make
markets in one or more options classes on a daily basis. Under the
current rules, if a SMCMM chooses to make markets in an options class,
it must participate in the opening rotation and continue to quote all
of the series of the options class through the close that day. Further,
SMCMMs are not allowed to initiate quoting in an options class
intraday.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \3\ See Securities Exchange Act Release No. 54580 (October 6,
2006), 71 FR 60781 (October 16, 2006) (SR-ISE-2006-40).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    The Exchange proposes to amend its Second Market rules as follows:
(1) Permit SMCMMs to quote in a greater number of options classes
intraday, and (2) relax the requirement that SMCMMs must participate in
the opening rotation in the options class that it chooses to make a
market in on a specific day. With this proposed rule change, SMCMMs may
initiate quoting in an options class intraday. However, the number of
options classes in which a SMCMM may initiate quoting shall be limited
to a number equal to the number of classes in which the SMCMM
participated in the opening rotation on that day. For example, if a
SMCMM participates in the opening rotation for 30 options classes, it
may initiate quoting intraday in an additional 30 classes. Once an
SMCMM starts quoting, it will continue to be required to quote all of
the series through the remainder of the day.
    The Exchange believes that relaxing the obligation for SMCMMs to
participate in the opening and permitting this class of market makers
to quote in a greater number of options classes intraday will encourage
additional SMCMM participation and add liquidity to these low-volume
options classes.
2. Statutory Basis
    The Exchange believes the proposed rule change is consistent with
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (the ``Act'') and the rules and
regulations thereunder and, in particular, the requirements of section
6(b) of the Act. Specifically, the Exchange believes the proposed rule
change is consistent with Section 6(b)(5) requirements that the rules
of an exchange be designed to promote just and equitable principles of
trade, to prevent fraudulent and manipulative acts, to remove
impediments to and perfect the mechanism for a free and open market and
a national market system, and, in general, to protect investors and the
public interest. In particular, the proposed rule change is designed to
attract additional liquidity in low-volume options classes by providing
for open access to market makers.

B. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement on Burden on Competition

    The proposed rule change does not impose any burden on competition
that is not necessary or appropriate in furtherance of the purposes of
the Act.

C. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement on Comments on the Proposed
Rule Change Received From Members, Participants, or Others

    The Exchange has not solicited, and does not intend to solicit,
comments on this proposed rule change. The Exchange has not received
any unsolicited written comments from members or other interested
parties.

III. Date of Effectiveness of the Proposed Rule Change and Timing for
Commission Action

    This proposed rule change does not significantly affect the
protection of investors or the public interest, does not impose any
significant burden on competition, and, by its terms, does not become
operative for 30 days after the date of the filing, or such shorter
time as the Commission may designate if consistent with the protection
of investors and the public interest. The Exchange provided the
Commission with written notice of its intent to file the proposed rule
change, along with a brief description and text of the proposed rule
change, at least five business days prior to the date of filing the
proposed rule change as required by Rule 19b-4(f)(6).\4\ The proposed
amendment to ISE Rule 904 will allow SMCMMs to quote in a greater
number of options classes intraday and thus provide additional
liquidity in the low-

volume options classes that trade in the Exchange's Second Market.
Further, no other exchange requires its market makers to participate in
the opening rotation in 100% of the series in options classes in which
it makes a market. For the foregoing reasons, this rule filing
qualifies for immediate effectiveness as a ``non-controversial'' rule
change under paragraph (f)(6) of Rule 19b-4 of the Act, as it does not
raise any new, unique or substantive issues, and is beneficial for
competitive purposes and to promote a free and open market for the
benefit of investors.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \4\ 17 CFR 240.19b-4(f)(6).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    At any time within 60 days of the filing of the proposed rule
change, the Commission may summarily abrogate such rule change if it
appears to the Commission that such action is necessary or appropriate
in the public interest, for the protection of investors, or otherwise
in furtherance of the purposes of the Act.

IV. Solicitation of Comments

    Interested persons are invited to submit written data, views and
arguments concerning the foregoing, including whether the proposed rule
change is consistent with the Act. Comments may be submitted by any of
the following methods:

Electronic Comments

     Use the Commission's Internet comment form (http://
www.sec.gov/rules/sro.shtml); or
     Send an e-mail to<EMAIL_ADDRESS>Please include
File Number SR-ISE-2009-15 on the subject line.

Paper Comments

     Send paper comments in triplicate to Elizabeth M. Murphy,
Secretary, Securities and Exchange Commission, 100 F Street, NE.,
Washington, DC 20549-1090.

All submissions should refer to File Number SR-ISE-2009-15. This file
number should be included on the subject line if e-mail is used. To
help the Commission process and review your comments more efficiently,
please use only one method. The Commission will post all comments on
the Commission's Internet Web site (http://www.sec.gov/rules/
sro.shtml). Copies of the submission, all subsequent amendments, all
written statements with respect to the proposed rule change that are
filed with the Commission, and all written communications relating to
the proposed rule change between the Commission and any person, other
than those that may be withheld from the public in accordance with the
provisions of 5 U.S.C. 552, will be available for inspection and
copying in the Commission's Public Reference Room, on official business
days between the hours of 10 a.m. and 3 p.m. Copies of the filing also
will be available for inspection and copying at the principal office of
the Exchange. All comments received will be posted without change; the
Commission does not edit personal identifying information from
submissions. You should submit only information that you wish to make
available publicly. All submissions should refer to File Number SR-ISE-
2009-15 and should be submitted on or before April 30, 2009.

    For the Commission, by the Division of Trading and Markets,
pursuant to delegated authority.\5\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \5\ 17 CFR 200.30-3(a)(12).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

Florence E. Harmon,
Deputy Secretary.
[FR Doc. E9-8066 Filed 4-8-09; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 8010-01-P


[Federal Register Volume 87, Number 227 (Monday, November 28, 2022)]
[Notices]
[Pages 73015-73016]
[FR Doc No: 2022-25906]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY

Federal Emergency Management Agency

[Docket ID FEMA-2022-0002; Internal Agency Docket No. FEMA-B-2287]

Proposed Flood Hazard Determinations

AGENCY: Federal Emergency Management Agency, Department of Homeland
Security.

ACTION: Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: Comments are requested on proposed flood hazard
determinations, which may include additions or modifications of any
Base Flood Elevation (BFE), base flood depth, Special Flood Hazard Area
(SFHA) boundary or zone designation, or regulatory floodway on the
Flood Insurance Rate Maps (FIRMs), and where applicable, in the
supporting Flood Insurance Study (FIS) reports for the communities
listed in the table below. The purpose of this notice is to seek
general information and comment regarding the preliminary FIRM, and
where applicable, the FIS report that the Federal Emergency Management
Agency (FEMA) has provided to the affected communities. The FIRM and
FIS report are the basis of the floodplain management measures that the
community is required either to adopt or to show evidence of having in
effect in order to qualify or remain qualified for participation in the
National Flood Insurance Program (NFIP).

DATES: Comments are to be submitted on or before February 27, 2023.

ADDRESSES: The Preliminary FIRM, and where applicable, the FIS report
for each community are available for inspection at both the online
location https://hazards.fema.gov/femaportal/prelimdownload and the
respective Community Map Repository address listed in the tables below.
Additionally, the current effective FIRM and FIS report for each
community are accessible online through the FEMA Map Service Center at
https://msc.fema.gov for comparison.
    You may submit comments, identified by Docket No. FEMA-B-2287, to
Rick Sacbibit, Chief, Engineering Services Branch, Federal Insurance
and Mitigation Administration, FEMA, 400 C Street SW, Washington, DC
20472,<PHONE_NUMBER>, or (email) [email protected]fema.dhs.gov.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Rick Sacbibit, Chief, Engineering
Services Branch, Federal Insurance and Mitigation Administration, FEMA,
400 C Street SW, Washington, DC 20472,<PHONE_NUMBER>, or (email)
[email protected]; or visit the FEMA Mapping and Insurance
eXchange (FMIX) online at https://www.floodmaps.fema.gov/fhm/fmx_main.html.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: FEMA proposes to make flood hazard
determinations for each community listed below, in accordance with
section 110 of the Flood Disaster Protection Act of 1973, 42 U.S.C.
4104, and 44 CFR 67.4(a).
    These proposed flood hazard determinations, together with the
floodplain management criteria required by 44 CFR 60.3, are the minimum
that are required. They should not be construed to mean that the
community must change any existing ordinances that are more stringent
in their floodplain management requirements. The community may at any
time enact stricter requirements of its own or pursuant to policies
established by other Federal, State, or regional entities. These flood
hazard determinations are used to meet the floodplain management
requirements of the NFIP.
    The communities affected by the flood hazard determinations are
provided in the tables below. Any request for reconsideration of the
revised flood hazard information shown on the Preliminary FIRM and FIS
report that satisfies the data requirements outlined in 44 CFR 67.6(b)
is considered an appeal. Comments unrelated to the flood hazard
determinations also will be considered before the FIRM and FIS report
become effective.
    Use of a Scientific Resolution Panel (SRP) is available to
communities in support of the appeal resolution process. SRPs are
independent panels of experts in hydrology, hydraulics, and other
pertinent sciences established to review conflicting scientific and
technical data and provide recommendations for resolution. Use of the
SRP only may be exercised after FEMA and local communities have been
engaged in a collaborative consultation process for at least 60 days
without a mutually acceptable resolution of an appeal. Additional
information regarding the SRP process can be found online at https://www.floodsrp.org/pdfs/srp_overview.pdf.
    The watersheds and/or communities affected are listed in the tables
below. The Preliminary FIRM, and where applicable, FIS report for each
community are available for inspection at both the online location
https://hazards.fema.gov/femaportal/prelimdownload and the respective
Community Map Repository address listed in the tables. For communities
with multiple ongoing Preliminary studies, the studies can be
identified by the unique project number and Preliminary FIRM date
listed in the tables. Additionally, the current effective FIRM and FIS
report for each community are accessible online through the FEMA Map
Service Center at https://msc.fema.gov for comparison.

(Catalog of Federal Domestic Assistance No. 97.022, ``Flood
Insurance.'')

Michael M. Grimm,
Assistant Administrator for Risk Management, Federal Emergency
Management Agency, Department of Homeland Security.

------------------------------------------------------------------------
                                             Community map repository
               Community                             address
------------------------------------------------------------------------
            Arapahoe County, Colorado and Incorporated Areas
          Project: 19-08-0022S Preliminary Date: June 10, 2022
------------------------------------------------------------------------
City of Centennial.....................  Southeast Metro Stormwater
                                          Authority, 7437 South Fairplay
                                          Street, Centennial, CO 80112.
City of Englewood......................  Civic Center, 1000 Englewood
                                          Parkway, Englewood, CO 80110.
City of Greenwood Village..............  City Hall, 6060 South Quebec
                                          Street, Greenwood Village, CO
                                          80111.
City of Littleton......................  Public Works Department, 2255
                                          West Berry Avenue, Littleton,
                                          CO 80120.
City of Sheridan.......................  Municipal Center, 4101 South
                                          Federal Boulevard, Sheridan,
                                          CO 80110.
Unincorporated Areas of Arapahoe County  Arapahoe County Public Works
                                          and Development Department,
                                          6924 South Lima Street,
                                          Centennial, CO 80112.
------------------------------------------------------------------------

              Harney County, Oregon and Incorporated Areas
           Project: 20-10-0012S Preliminary Date: May 27, 2022
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Burns Paiute Reservation...............  Burns Paiute Tribal Office, 100
                                          Pasigo Street, Burns, OR
                                          97720.
City of Burns..........................  City Hall, 242 South Broadway
                                          Avenue, Burns, OR 97720.
City of Hines..........................  City Hall, 101 East Barnes
                                          Avenue, Hines, OR 97738.
Unincorporated Areas of Harney County..  Harney County Planning
                                          Department, 360 North Alvord
                                          Avenue, Burns, OR 97720.
------------------------------------------------------------------------
               Lane County, Oregon and Incorporated Areas
Project: 17-10-0923S Preliminary Date: February 28, 2020 and January 28,
                                  2022
------------------------------------------------------------------------
City of Cottage Grove..................  City Hall, 400 East Main
                                          Street, Cottage Grove, OR
                                          97424.
City of Creswell.......................  City Hall, 13 South 1st Street,
                                          Creswell, OR 97426.
City of Eugene.........................  Public Works Department, 99
                                          West 10th Avenue, Eugene, OR
                                          97401.
City of Springfield....................  Planning Department, 225 5th
                                          Street, Springfield, OR 97477.
Unincorporated Areas of Lane County....  Lane County Public Works
                                          Building, 3050 North Delta
                                          Highway, Eugene, OR 97408.
------------------------------------------------------------------------

[FR Doc. 2022-25906 Filed 11-25-22; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 9110-12-P


[Federal Register Volume 84, Number 84 (Wednesday, May 1, 2019)]
[Notices]
[Pages 18529-18530]
[FR Doc No: 2019-08790]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission

[Project No. 2323-226]

Great River Hydro, LLC; Notice of Application Accepted for Filing
and Soliciting Comments, Motions To Intervene, and Protests

    Take notice that the following hydroelectric application has been
filed with the Commission and is available for public inspection.
    a. Type of Application: Non-capacity amendment of license.
    b. Project No.: 2323-226.
    c. Date Filed: January 4, 2019, and supplemented February 22, 2019
and April 17, 2019.
    d. Applicant: Great River Hydro, LLC.
    e. Name of Project: Deerfield River Hydroelectric Project.
    f. Location: The project is located on the Deerfield River in
Berkshire and Franklin counties, Massachusetts, and Bennington and
Windham counties Vermont.
    g. Filed Pursuant to: Federal Power Act, 16 U.S.C. 791 (a)-825(r).
    h. Applicant Contact: Mr. John Ragonese, FERC License Manager,
Great River Hydro, LLC, One Harbour Place, Suite 330, Portsmouth, NH
03801,<PHONE_NUMBER>.
    i. FERC Contact: Steven Sachs,<PHONE_NUMBER>,
<EMAIL_ADDRESS>    j. Deadline for filing comments, motions to intervene, and protests
is 30 days from the issuance of this notice by the Commission. The
Commission strongly encourages electronic filing. Please file comments,
motions to intervene, and protests using the Commission's eFiling
system at http://www.ferc.gov/docs-filing/efiling.asp.

Commenters can submit brief comments up to 6,000 characters, without
prior registration, using the eComment system at http://www.ferc.gov/doc-sfiling/ecomment.asp. You must include your name and contact
information at the end of your comments. For assistance, please contact
FERC Online Support at<EMAIL_ADDRESS>(866) 208-3676 (toll
free), or<PHONE_NUMBER> (TTY). In lieu of electronic filing, please
send a paper copy to: Secretary, Federal Energy Regulatory Commission,
888 First Street NE, Washington, DC 20426. The first page of any filing
should include docket number P-2323-226.
    k. Description of Request: The applicant proposes to install a 230-
kilowatt turbine-generator unit within the existing minimum flow
release pipe at the No. 5 development of its Deerfield River
Hydroelectric Project. The new unit would have a maximum hydraulic
capacity of 87 cubic feet per second and produce approximately 1,269
megawatt-hours annually.
    l. Locations of the Applications: A copy of the application is
available for inspection and reproduction at the Commission's Public
Reference Room, located at 888 First Street NE, Room 2A, Washington, DC
20426, or by calling<PHONE_NUMBER>. The filing may also be viewed on
the Commission's website at http://www.ferc.gov/docs-filing/elibrary.asp. Enter the docket number excluding the last three digits
in the docket number field to access the document. You may also
register online at http://www.ferc.gov/docs-filing/esubscription.asp to
be notified via email of new filings and issuances related to this or
other pending projects. For assistance, call 1-866-208-3676 or email
<EMAIL_ADDRESS>for TTY, call (202) 502- 8659. Agencies may
obtain copies of the application directly from the applicant.
    m. Individuals desiring to be included on the Commission's mailing
list should so indicate by writing to the Secretary of the Commission.
    n. Comments, Motions to Intervene, or Protests: Anyone may submit
comments, a motion to intervene, or a protest in accordance with the
requirements of Rules of Practice and Procedure, 18 CFR 385.210, .211,
.214. In determining the appropriate action to take, the Commission
will consider all protests or other comments filed, but only those who
file a motion to intervene in accordance with the Commission's Rules
may become a party to the proceeding. Any comments, motions to
intervene, or protests must be received on or before the specified
comment date for the particular application.
    o. Filing and Service of Responsive Documents: Any filing must (1)
bear in all capital letters the title COMMENTS, MOTION TO INTERVENE, or
PROTEST as applicable; (2) set forth in the heading the name of the
applicant and the project number of the application to which the filing
responds; (3) furnish the name, address, and telephone number of the
person protesting or intervening; and (4) otherwise comply with the
requirements of 18 CFR 385.2001 through 385.2005. All comments, motions
to intervene, or protests must set forth their evidentiary basis. Any
filing made by an intervenor must be accompanied by proof of service on
all persons listed in the service list prepared by the Commission in
this proceeding, in accordance with 18 CFR 385.2010.
    p. Waiver of Pre-filing Consultation: Based on a review of the
application, resource agency consultation letters, and comments filed
to date, we accept the consultation that has occurred on this project
as satisfying our requirements for the standard 3-stage consultation
process under 18 CFR 4.38, and are waiving the requirement to conduct
second stage consultation pursuant to section 4.38(c)(4) of the
Commission's regulations, as requested by the applicant.

    Dated: April 25, 2019.
Kimberly D. Bose,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2019-08790 Filed 4-30-19; 8:45 am]
 BILLING CODE 6717-01-P


[Federal Register: November 20, 2007 (Volume 72, Number 223)]
[Notices]
[Page 65318]
[DOCID:fr20no07-49]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission

[Docket No. ER07-1378-000]

Providence Heights Wind, LLC; Notice of Issuance of Order

November 13, 2007.
    Providence Heights Wind, LLC (Providence) filed an application for
market-based rate authority, with an accompanying rate schedule. The
proposed market-based rate schedule provides for the sale of energy,
capacity and ancillary services at market-based rates. Providence also
requested waivers of various Commission regulations. In particular,
Providence requested that the Commission grant blanket approval under
18 C.F.R. Part 34 of all future issuances of securities and assumptions
of liability by Providence.
    On November 9, 2007, pursuant to delegated authority, the Director,
Division of Tariffs and Market Development-West, granted the requests
for blanket approval under Part 34 (Director's Order). The Director's
Order also stated that the Commission would publish a separate notice
in the Federal Register establishing a period of time for the filing of
protests. Accordingly, any person desiring to be heard concerning the
blanket approvals of issuances of securities or assumptions of
liability by Providence, should file a protest with the Federal Energy
Regulatory Commission, 888 First Street, NE., Washington, DC 20426, in
accordance with Rules 211 and 214 of the Commission's Rules of Practice
and Procedure. 18 CFR 385.211, 385.214 (2004).
    Notice is hereby given that the deadline for filing protests is
December 10, 2007.
    Absent a request to be heard in opposition to such blanket
approvals by the deadline above, Providence is authorized to issue
securities and assume obligations or liabilities as a guarantor,
indorser, surety, or otherwise in respect of any security of another
person; provided that such issuance or assumption is for some lawful
object within the corporate purposes of Providence, compatible with the
public interest, and is reasonably necessary or appropriate for such
purposes.
    The Commission reserves the right to require a further showing that
neither public nor private interests will be adversely affected by
continued approvals of Providence's issuance of securities or
assumptions of liability.
    Copies of the full text of the Director's Order are available from
the Commission's Public Reference Room, 888 First Street, NE.,
Washington, DC 20426. The Order may also be viewed on the Commission's
Web site at http://www.ferc.gov, using the eLibrary link. Enter the

docket number excluding the last three digits in the docket number
filed to access the document. Comments, protests, and interventions may
be filed electronically via the internet in lieu of paper. See, 18 CFR
385.2001(a) (1) (iii) and the instructions on the Commission's Web site
under the ``e-Filing'' link. The Commission strongly encourages
electronic filings.

Kimberly D. Bose,
 Secretary.
 [FR Doc. E7-22623 Filed 11-19-07; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 6717-01-P


[Federal Register Volume 80, Number 189 (Wednesday, September 30, 2015)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Pages 58600-58602]
[FR Doc No: 2015-24795]

=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES

Food and Drug Administration

21 CFR Part 73

[Docket No. FDA-2015-C-1154]

Listing of Color Additives Exempt From Certification; Mica-Based
Pearlescent Pigments

AGENCY: Food and Drug Administration, HHS.

ACTION: Final rule.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Food and Drug Administration (``FDA'' or ``we'') is
amending the color additive regulations to provide for the safe use of
mica-based pearlescent pigments prepared from titanium dioxide and mica
as color additives in certain distilled spirits. This action is in
response to a color additive petition (CAP) submitted by E. & J. Gallo
Winery.

DATES: This rule is effective November 2, 2015. See section VIII for
further information on the filing of objections. Submit either
electronic or written objections and requests for a hearing by October
30, 2015.

ADDRESSES: You may submit either electronic or written objections and
requests for a hearing, identified by Docket No. FDA-2015-C-1154, by
any of the following methods:

Electronic Submissions

    Submit electronic objections in the following way:
     Federal eRulemaking Portal: http://www.regulations.gov.
Follow the instructions for submitting comments.

Written Submissions

    Submit written objections in the following ways:
     Mail/Hand delivery/Courier (for paper or submissions):
Division of Dockets Management (HFA-305), Food and Drug Administration,
5630 Fishers Lane, Rm. 1061, Rockville, MD 20852.
    Instructions: All submissions received must include the Agency name
and Docket No. FDA-2015-C-1154 for this rulemaking. All objections
received will be posted without change to http://www.regulations.gov,
including any personal information provided. For detailed instructions
on submitting objections, see the ``Objections'' heading of the
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION section.
    Docket: For access to the docket to read background documents or
objections received, go to http://www.regulations.gov and insert the
docket number, found in brackets in the heading of this document, into
the ``Search'' box and follow the prompts and/or go to the Division of
Dockets Management, 5630 Fishers Lane, Rm. 1061, Rockville, MD 20852.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Salome Bhagan, Center for Food Safety
and Applied Nutrition (HFS-265), Food and Drug Administration, 5100
Paint Branch Pkwy., College Park, MD 20740-3835,<PHONE_NUMBER>.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

I. Background

    In a notice published in the Federal Register on April 22, 2015 (80
FR 22449), we announced that we filed a color additive petition (CAP
5C0302) to amend the color additive regulations in Sec.  73.350 Mica-
based pearlescent pigments (21 CFR 73.350).
    CAP 5C0302 was submitted by E. & J. Gallo Winery, c/o Keller and
Heckman LLP, Three Embarcadero Center, Suite 1420, San Francisco, CA
94111 (petitioner). In CAP 5C0302, E. & J. Gallo Winery proposed to
amend the color additive regulations in Sec.  73.350 to increase the
maximum permitted alcohol content of distilled spirits to which mica-
based pearlescent pigments may be added from 23 percent to 25 percent
alcohol by volume, and to remove the current limitation for distilled
spirits mixtures containing more than 5 percent wine on a proof gallon
basis. The term ``distilled spirits'' is defined by the Alcohol and
Tobacco Tax and Trade Bureau as ethyl alcohol, hydrated oxide of ethyl,
spirits of wine, whisky, rum, brandy, gin, and other distilled spirits,
including all dilutions and mixtures thereof, for nonindustrial use.
The term does not include mixtures containing wine, bottled at 48
degrees of proof or less, if the mixture contains more than 50 percent
wine on a proof gallon basis (27 CFR 5.11).
    Mica-based pearlescent pigments prepared from titanium dioxide and
mica are currently approved under Sec.  73.350(c)(1)(i) for use as a
color additive in amounts up to 1.25 percent, by weight, in cereals,
confections and frostings, gelatin deserts, hard and soft candies
(including lozenges), nutritional supplement tablets and gelatin
capsules, and chewing gum. They are also approved under Sec.
73.350(c)(1)(ii) in amounts up to 0.07 percent, by weight, in:
Distilled spirits containing not less than 18 percent and not more than
23 percent alcohol by volume but not including distilled spirits
mixtures containing more than 5 percent wine on a proof gallon basis
(Sec.  73.350(c)(1)(ii)(A)); cordials, liqueurs, flavored alcoholic
malt beverages, wine coolers, and cocktails (Sec.
73.350(c)(1)(ii)(B)); and non-alcoholic cocktail mixes and mixers, such
as margarita mix, Bloody Mary mix, and daiquiri mix, but excluding
eggnog, tonic water, and beverages that are typically consumed without
added alcohol (e.g., fruit juices, fruit juice drinks, and soft drinks)
(Sec.  73.350(c)(1)(ii)(C)). The pigments also are approved under Sec.
73.350(c)(1)(iii) in egg decorating kits used for coloring the shells
of eggs in amounts consistent with good manufacturing practice. Mica-
based pearlescent pigments prepared from titanium dioxide on mica, iron
oxide on mica, and titanium dioxide and iron oxide on mica are approved
for use as a color additive in ingested drugs under Sec.  73.1350 (21
CFR 73.1350). Mica-based pearlescent pigments formed by depositing
titanium or iron salts from a basic solution onto mica, followed by
calcination to produce titanium dioxide or iron oxides on mica, are
approved for use in contact lenses under Sec.  73.3128 (21 CFR
73.3128). The color additive that is mica-based pearlescent pigments
prepared from titanium dioxide and mica will be referred hereinafter in
this final rule as mica-based pearlescent pigments.

II. Safety Evaluation

A. Determination of Safety

    Under section 721(b)(4) of the Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act
(the FD&C Act) (21 U.S.C. 379e(b)(4)), a color additive cannot be
listed for a particular use unless the data and information available
to FDA establishes that the color additive is safe for that use. FDA's
color additive regulations in 21 CFR 70.3(i) define ``safe'' to mean
that there is convincing evidence that establishes with reasonable
certainty that no harm will result from the intended use of the color
additive. To establish with reasonable certainty that a color additive
intended for use in food is not harmful under its intended conditions
of use, we consider the projected human dietary exposure to the
additive, the additive's toxicological data, and other relevant
information (such as published literature) available to us. We compare
an individual's estimated daily intake (EDI) of the additive from all
sources to an acceptable daily intake (ADI) established by
toxicological data. The EDI is determined by projections based on the
amount of the additive proposed for use in particular foods and on data
regarding the amount consumed from all sources of the additive. We
typically use the EDI for the 90th percentile consumer of a color
additive as a

measure of high chronic dietary exposure.

B. Safety of the Petitioned Use of the Color Additive

    During our safety review of the use of mica-based pearlescent
pigments proposed in CAP 5C0302, we considered the exposure to the
color additive from its petitioned use and from the currently permitted
uses in food and ingested drugs under Sec. Sec.  73.350 and 73.1350,
respectively. In estimating the cumulative estimated dietary intake
(CEDI) of these pigments, we determined that the exposure to mica-based
pearlescent pigments from the use in egg decorating kits used for
coloring the shells of boiled eggs and in contact lenses (Sec. Sec.
73.350(c)(1)(iii) and 73.3128, respectively) is negligible and,
therefore, does not contribute to the exposure.
    The petitioner estimated the eaters-only exposure to mica-based
pearlescent pigments from the proposed use in distilled spirits
containing not less than 18 percent and not more than 25 percent
alcohol by volume at 0.14 grams per person per day (g/p/d) at the mean
and 0.31 g/p/d at the 90th percentile for the U.S. population (Ref. 1).
(An eaters-only exposure is the total of the amount of food consumed
per day averaged over the number of days in the survey period by
individuals consuming the food at least once during the survey period.)
We conclude that the petitioner's exposure estimates are sufficiently
conservative to account for the petitioned use of mica-based
pearlescent pigments. Regarding cumulative exposure from the current
and petitioned uses of mica-based pearlescent pigments, we note that in
our recent final rule that provided for the safe use of mica-based
pearlescent pigments as color additives in cordials, liqueurs, flavored
alcoholic malt beverages, wine coolers, cocktails, non-alcoholic
cocktail mixers and mixes, and in egg decorating kits for coloring
shell eggs, we estimated the CEDI for the use of mica-based pearlescent
pigments in food (Sec.  73.350) and ingested drugs (Sec.  73.1350) to
be 0.25 g/p/d at the mean and 0.50 g/p/d at the 90th percentile for the
U.S. population (80 FR 32303 at 32305, June 8, 2015). Since the
petitioned use of mica-based pearlescent pigments will generally
substitute for currently-permitted uses of mica-based pearlescent
pigments in other alcoholic beverages with no change in the maximum use
level of 0.07 percent by weight, we have determined that the petitioned
use of mica-based pearlescent pigments will not result in an increase
in consumer exposure to these pigments. Therefore, we conclude that our
previous CEDI for mica-based pearlescent pigments of 0.25 g/p/d at the
mean and 0.50 g/p/d at the 90th percentile for the U.S. population will
remain unchanged (Ref. 1).
    To support the safety of the proposed use of mica-based pearlescent
pigments in food, the petitioner referenced the safety determination
made by FDA for previously filed petitions (70 FR 42271, July 22,
2005); (71 FR 31927, June 2, 2006); and (78 FR 35115, June 12, 2013);
including our previously established ADI for mica-based pearlescent
pigments of 1.8 g/p/d based on a 2-year rat carcinogenicity bioassay
(71 FR 31927 at 31928). Because there is no increase in the intake of
mica-based pearlescent pigments beyond a level that has already been
established as safe, FDA has no concerns regarding the petitioned use
of mica-based pearlescent pigments in distilled spirits containing not
less than 18 percent and not more than 25 percent alcohol by volume
(Ref. 2).

III. Conclusion

    Based on the data and information in the petition and other
relevant material, FDA concludes that the petitioned use of mica-based
pearlescent pigments prepared from titanium dioxide and mica as a color
additive at a level of up to 0.07 percent by weight in distilled
spirits containing not less than 18 percent and not more than 25
percent alcohol by volume, is safe. We further conclude that the
additive will achieve its intended technical effect and is suitable for
the petitioned use. Therefore, we are amending the color additive
regulations in part 73 as set forth in this document. In addition,
based upon the factors listed in 21 CFR 71.20(b), we conclude that
certification of mica-based pearlescent pigments prepared from titanium
dioxide and mica is not necessary for the protection of the public
health.

IV. Public Disclosure

    In accordance with Sec.  71.15 (21 CFR 71.15), the petitions and
the documents that we considered and relied upon in reaching our
decision to approve the petition will be made available for public
disclosure (see FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT). As provided in Sec.
71.15, we will delete from the documents any materials that are not
available for public disclosure.

V. Environmental Impact

    We previously considered the environmental effects of this rule, as
stated in the April 22, 2015 notice of filing for CAP 5C0302 (80 FR
22449). We stated that we had determined, under 21 CFR 25.32(k), that
this action is of a type that does not individually or cumulatively
have a significant effect on the human environment such that neither an
environmental assessment nor an environmental impact statement is
required. We have not received any new information or comments that
would affect our previous determination.

VI. Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995

    This final rule contains no collection of information. Therefore,
clearance by the Office of Management and Budget under the Paperwork
Reduction Act of 1995 is not required.

VII. Section 301(ll) of the Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act

    Our review of this petition was limited to section 721 of the FD&C
Act. This final rule is not a statement regarding compliance with other
sections of the FD&C Act. For example, section 301(ll) of the FD&C Act
prohibits the introduction or delivery for introduction into interstate
commerce of any food that contains a drug approved under section 505 of
the FD&C Act (21 U.S.C. 355), a biological product licensed under
section 351 of the Public Health Service Act (42 U.S.C. 262), or a drug
or biological product for which substantial clinical investigations
have been instituted and their existence has been made public, unless
one of the exemptions in section 301(ll)(1) to (ll)(4) of the FD&C Act
applies. In our review of this petition, we did not consider whether
section 301(ll) of the FD&C Act or any of its exemptions apply to food
containing this additive. Accordingly, this final rule should not be
construed to be a statement that a food containing this additive, if
introduced or delivered for introduction into interstate commerce,
would not violate section 301(ll) of the FD&C Act. Furthermore, this
language is included in all color additive final rules that pertain to
food and therefore should not be construed to be a statement of the
likelihood that section 301(ll) of the FD&C Act applies.

VIII. Objections

    This rule is effective as shown in the DATES section, except as to
any provisions that may be stayed by the filing of proper objections.
If you will be adversely affected by one or more provisions of this
regulation, you may file with the Division of Dockets Management (see
ADDRESSES) either electronic or written objections. You must separately
number each objection, and within each numbered objection you must
specify with particularity the provision(s) to which you object, and
the grounds for your objection. Within

each numbered objection, you must specifically state whether you are
requesting a hearing on the particular provision that you specify in
that numbered objection. If you do not request a hearing for any
particular objection, you waive the right to a hearing on that
objection. If you request a hearing, your objection must include a
detailed description and analysis of the specific factual information
you intend to present in support of the objection in the event that a
hearing is held. If you do not include such a description and analysis
for any particular objection, you waive the right to a hearing on the
objection.
    It is only necessary to send one set of documents. Identify
documents with the docket number found in brackets in the heading of
this document. Any objections received in response to the regulation
may be seen in the Division of Dockets Management between 9 a.m. and 4
p.m., Monday through Friday, and will be posted to the docket at http://www.regulations.gov. We will publish notice of the objections that we
have received or lack thereof in the Federal Register.

 IX. References

    The following references have been placed on display in the
Division of Dockets Management (see ADDRESSES) and may be seen by
interested persons between 9 a.m. and 4 p.m., Monday through Friday and
are available electronically at http://www.regulations.gov.

1. FDA Memorandum from H. Lee, Chemistry Review Group, Division of
Petition Review, to S. Bhagan, Regulatory Group I, Division of
Petition Review, May 19, 2015.
2. FDA Memorandum from S. Park, Toxicology Team, Division of
Petition Review, to S. Bhagan, Regulatory Group I, Division of
Petition Review, June 8, 2015.

List of Subjects in 21 CFR Part 73

    Color additives, Cosmetics, Drugs, Medical devices.

    Therefore, under the Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act and under
authority delegated to the Commissioner of Food and Drugs, and
redelegated to the Director, Center for Food Safety and Applied
Nutrition, 21 CFR part 73 is amended as follows:

PART 73--LISTING OF COLOR ADDITIVES EXEMPT FROM CERTIFICATION

0
1. The authority citation for 21 CFR part 73 continues to read as
follows:

    Authority: 21 U.S.C. 321, 341, 342, 343, 348, 351, 352, 355,
361, 362, 371, 379e.

0
2. Section 73.350 is amended by revising paragraph (c)(1)(ii)(A) to
read as follows:

Sec.  73.350  Mica-based pearlescent pigments.

* * * * *
    (c) * * *
    (1) * * *
    (ii) * * *
    (A) Distilled spirits containing not less than 18 percent and not
more than 25 percent alcohol by volume.
* * * * *

    Dated: September 25, 2015.
Susan Bernard,
Director, Office of Regulations, Policy and Social Sciences, Center for
Food Safety and Applied Nutrition.
[FR Doc. 2015-24795 Filed 9-29-15; 8:45 am]
 BILLING CODE 4164-01-P


[Federal Register Volume 81, Number 205 (Monday, October 24, 2016)]
[Proposed Rules]
[Pages 73042-73044]
[FR Doc No: 2016-25351]

========================================================================
Proposed Rules
                                                Federal Register
________________________________________________________________________

This section of the FEDERAL REGISTER contains notices to the public of
the proposed issuance of rules and regulations. The purpose of these
notices is to give interested persons an opportunity to participate in
the rule making prior to the adoption of the final rules.

========================================================================

Federal Register / Vol. 81, No. 205 / Monday, October 24, 2016 /
Proposed Rules

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION

Federal Aviation Administration

14 CFR Part 39

[Docket No. FAA-2016-9190; Directorate Identifier 2016-NM-087-AD]
RIN 2120-AA64

Airworthiness Directives; Bombardier, Inc. Airplanes

AGENCY: Federal Aviation Administration (FAA), DOT.

ACTION: Notice of proposed rulemaking (NPRM).

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: We propose to supersede Airworthiness Directive (AD) 2014-23-
06, for certain Bombardier, Inc. Model CL-600-2B19 (Regional Jet Series
100 & 440) airplanes. AD 2014-23-06 currently requires modifying the
main landing gear (MLG) by installing a new bracket on the left and
right lower aft-wing planks. Since we issued AD 2014-23-06, we have
determined that it is necessary to require a different modification of
the MLG. This proposed AD would require modification of the MLG with an
improved design. We are proposing this AD to prevent incorrect
installation of the brake hydraulic lines, which could cause the brakes
and the anti-skid system to operate incorrectly, and result in
catastrophic failure of the airplane during a high-speed rejected
takeoff.

DATES: We must receive comments on this proposed AD by December 8,
2016.

ADDRESSES: You may send comments, using the procedures found in 14 CFR
11.43 and 11.45, by any of the following methods:
     Federal eRulemaking Portal: Go to http://www.regulations.gov. Follow the instructions for submitting comments.
     Fax:<PHONE_NUMBER>.
     Mail: U.S. Department of Transportation, Docket
Operations, M-30, West Building Ground Floor, Room W12-140, 1200 New
Jersey Avenue SE., Washington, DC 20590.
     Hand Delivery: U.S. Department of Transportation, Docket
Operations, M-30, West Building Ground Floor, Room W12-140, 1200 New
Jersey Avenue SE., Washington, DC, between 9 a.m. and 5 p.m., Monday
through Friday, except Federal holidays.
    For service information identified in this NPRM, contact
Bombardier, Inc., 400 C[ocirc]te-Vertu Road West, Dorval, Qu[eacute]bec
H4S 1Y9, Canada; Widebody Customer Response Center North America toll-
free telephone 1-866-538-1247 or direct-dial telephone 1-514-855-2999;
fax<PHONE_NUMBER>; email<EMAIL_ADDRESS>Internet http://www.bombardier.com. You may view this referenced service information at
the FAA, Transport Airplane Directorate, 1601 Lind Avenue SW., Renton,
WA. For information on the availability of this material at the FAA,
call<PHONE_NUMBER>.

Examining the AD Docket

    You may examine the AD docket on the Internet at http://www.regulations.gov by searching for and locating Docket No. FAA-2016-
9190; or in person at the Docket Management Facility between 9 a.m. and
5 p.m., Monday through Friday, except Federal holidays. The AD docket
contains this proposed AD, the regulatory evaluation, any comments
received, and other information. The street address for the Docket
Operations office (telephone<PHONE_NUMBER>) is in the ADDRESSES section.
Comments will be available in the AD docket shortly after receipt.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Fabio Buttitta, Aerospace Engineer,
Airframe and Mechanical Systems Branch, ANE-171, FAA, New York Aircraft
Certification Office, 1600 Stewart Avenue, Suite 410, Westbury, NY
11590; telephone<PHONE_NUMBER>; fax<PHONE_NUMBER>.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

Comments Invited

    We invite you to send any written relevant data, views, or
arguments about this proposed AD. Send your comments to an address
listed under the ADDRESSES section. Include ``Docket No. FAA-2016-9190;
Directorate Identifier 2016-NM-087-AD'' at the beginning of your
comments. We specifically invite comments on the overall regulatory,
economic, environmental, and energy aspects of this proposed AD. We
will consider all comments received by the closing date and may amend
this proposed AD based on those comments.
    We will post all comments we receive, without change, to http://www.regulations.gov, including any personal information you provide. We
will also post a report summarizing each substantive verbal contact we
receive about this proposed AD.

Discussion

    On November 5, 2014, we issued AD 2014-23-06, Amendment 39-18022
(79 FR 69037, November 20, 2014) (``AD 2014-23-06''). AD 2014-23-06
requires actions intended to correct an unsafe condition for certain
Bombardier, Inc. Model CL-600-2B19 (Regional Jet Series 100 & 440)
airplanes.
    Since we issued AD 2014-23-06, we have determined that the
modification required by AD 2014-23-06 is inadequate, and that it is
necessary to require an improved modification of the MLG.
    Transport Canada Civil Aviation (TCCA), which is the aviation
authority for Canada, has issued Canadian Airworthiness Directive CF-
2014-10R1, dated May 4, 2016 (referred to after this as the Mandatory
Continuing Airworthiness Information, or ``the MCAI''), to correct an
unsafe condition for certain Bombardier, Inc. Model CL-600-2B19
(Regional Jet Series 100 & 440) airplanes. The MCAI states:

    Cases of inboard and outboard hydraulic brake lines connected to
the incorrect port of the swivel assembly on the main landing gear
were found in service. Cross-connected brake hydraulic lines can
cause the brakes and/or the anti-skid system to operate incorrectly.
During a high speed rejected take-off, inability for the brakes to
operate correctly could be catastrophic. The original issue of this
[Canadian] AD mandated the modification to prevent inadvertent
cross-connection of the inboard and outboard hydraulic brake lines.
    Following the initial release of this [Canadian] AD, operators
reported that the modifications required by Bombardier Service
Bulletin (SB) 601R-32-110 Rev. NC., dated 19 December 2013, still
have a potential for incorrect connection. Subsequently, the SB has
been revised to introduce a modified design and this [Canadian] AD
revision is issued to mandate the incorporation of the modified
design.

    You may examine the MCAI in the AD docket on the Internet at http://www.regulations.gov by searching for

and locating Docket No. FAA-2016-9190.

Related Service Information Under 1 CFR Part 51

    Bombardier, Inc. has issued Bombardier Service Bulletin 601R-32-
110, Revision C, dated May 4, 2016. The service information describes
modifying the MLG by installing a block on the left and right lower
aft-wing planks. This service information is reasonably available
because the interested parties have access to it through their normal
course of business or by the means identified in the ADDRESSES section.

FAA's Determination and Requirements of This Proposed AD

    This product has been approved by the aviation authority of another
country, and is approved for operation in the United States. Pursuant
to our bilateral agreement with the State of Design Authority, we have
been notified of the unsafe condition described in the MCAI and service
information referenced above. We are proposing this AD because we
evaluated all pertinent information and determined an unsafe condition
exists and is likely to exist or develop on other products of the same
type design.

Costs of Compliance

    We estimate that this proposed AD affects 526 airplanes of U.S.
registry.
    We also estimate that it would take about 9 work-hours per product
to comply with the basic requirements of this proposed AD. The average
labor rate is $85 per work-hour. Required parts would cost about $190
per product. Based on these figures, we estimate the cost of this
proposed AD on U.S. operators to be $502,330, or $955 per product.

Authority for This Rulemaking

    Title 49 of the United States Code specifies the FAA's authority to
issue rules on aviation safety. Subtitle I, section 106, describes the
authority of the FAA Administrator. ``Subtitle VII: Aviation
Programs,'' describes in more detail the scope of the Agency's
authority.
    We are issuing this rulemaking under the authority described in
``Subtitle VII, Part A, Subpart III, Section 44701: General
requirements.'' Under that section, Congress charges the FAA with
promoting safe flight of civil aircraft in air commerce by prescribing
regulations for practices, methods, and procedures the Administrator
finds necessary for safety in air commerce. This regulation is within
the scope of that authority because it addresses an unsafe condition
that is likely to exist or develop on products identified in this
rulemaking action.

Regulatory Findings

    We determined that this proposed AD would not have federalism
implications under Executive Order 13132. This proposed AD would not
have a substantial direct effect on the States, on the relationship
between the national Government and the States, or on the distribution
of power and responsibilities among the various levels of government.
    For the reasons discussed above, I certify this proposed
regulation:
    1. Is not a ``significant regulatory action'' under Executive Order
12866;
    2. Is not a ``significant rule'' under the DOT Regulatory Policies
and Procedures (44 FR 11034, February 26, 1979);
    3. Will not affect intrastate aviation in Alaska; and
    4. Will not have a significant economic impact, positive or
negative, on a substantial number of small entities under the criteria
of the Regulatory Flexibility Act.

List of Subjects in 14 CFR Part 39

    Air transportation, Aircraft, Aviation safety, Incorporation by
reference, Safety.

The Proposed Amendment

    Accordingly, under the authority delegated to me by the
Administrator, the FAA proposes to amend 14 CFR part 39 as follows:

PART 39--AIRWORTHINESS DIRECTIVES

0
1. The authority citation for part 39 continues to read as follows:

    Authority: 49 U.S.C. 106(g), 40113, 44701.

Sec.  39.13  [Amended]

0
2. The FAA amends Sec.  39.13 by removing Airworthiness Directive (AD)
2014-23-06, Amendment 39-18022 (79 FR 69037, November 20, 2014), and
adding the following new AD:

Bombardier, Inc.: Docket No. FAA-2016-9190; Directorate Identifier
2016-NM-087-AD.

(a) Comments Due Date

    We must receive comments by December 8, 2016.

(b) Affected ADs

    This AD replaces AD 2014-23-06, Amendment 39-18022 (79 FR 69037,
November 20, 2014) (``AD 2014-23-06'').

(c) Applicability

    This AD applies to Bombardier, Inc. Model CL-600-2B19 (Regional
Jet Series 100 & 440) airplanes, certificated in any category,
serial numbers 7003 and subsequent.

(d) Subject

    Air Transport Association (ATA) of America Code 32, Landing
gear.

(e) Reason

    This AD was prompted by a report indicating that inboard and
outboard hydraulic lines of the brakes were found connected to the
incorrect ports on the swivel assembly of the main landing gear
(MLG). We are issuing this AD to prevent incorrect installation of
the brake hydraulic lines, which could cause the brakes and the
anti-skid system to operate incorrectly, and result in catastrophic
failure of the airplane during a high-speed rejected takeoff.

(f) Compliance

    Comply with this AD within the compliance times specified,
unless already done.

 (g) Modification of the MLG

    (1) For airplanes on which Bombardier Service Bulletin 601R-32-
110, dated December 19, 2013, has been incorporated: Within 6,600
flight hours or 37 months after the effective date of this AD,
whichever occurs first, modify the MLG, in accordance with Part B of
the Accomplishment Instructions of Bombardier Service Bulletin 601R-
32-110, Revision C, dated May 4, 2016.
    (2) For airplanes on which Bombardier Service Bulletin 601R-32-
110, dated December 19, 2013, has not been incorporated: Within
4,400 flight hours or 24 months after the effective date of this AD,
whichever occurs first, modify the MLG, in accordance with Part A of
the Accomplishment Instructions of Bombardier Service Bulletin 601R-
32-110, Revision C, dated May 4, 2016.

(h) Credit for Previous Actions

    (1) This paragraph provides credit for actions required by
paragraph (g)(1) of this AD, if those actions were performed before
the effective date of this AD using Part B of Bombardier Service
Bulletin 601R-32-110, Revision A, dated October 29, 2015; or
Revision B, dated January 26, 2016.
    (2) This paragraph provides credit for actions required by
paragraph (g)(2) of this AD, if those actions were performed before
the effective date of this AD using Part A of Bombardier Service
Bulletin 601R-32-110, Revision A, dated October 29, 2015; or
Revision B, dated January 26, 2016.

(i) Other FAA AD Provisions

    The following provisions also apply to this AD:
    (1) Alternative Methods of Compliance (AMOCs): The Manager, New
York Aircraft Certification Office (ACO), ANE-170, FAA, has the
authority to approve AMOCs for this AD, if requested using the
procedures found in 14 CFR 39.19. In accordance with 14 CFR 39.19,
send your request to your principal inspector or local Flight
Standards District Office, as appropriate. If sending information
directly to the New York ACO, send it to ATTN: Program Manager,
Continuing Operational Safety, FAA, New York ACO, 1600 Stewart
Avenue, Suite 410, Westbury, NY 11590; telephone<PHONE_NUMBER>; fax

516-794-5531. Before using any approved AMOC, notify your
appropriate principal inspector, or lacking a principal inspector,
the manager of the local flight standards district office/
certificate holding district office.
    (2) Contacting the Manufacturer: As of the effective date of
this AD, for any requirement in this AD to obtain corrective actions
from a manufacturer, the action must be accomplished using a method
approved by the Manager, New York ACO, ANE-170, FAA; or Transport
Canada Civil Aviation (TCCA); or Bombardier, Inc.'s TCCA Design
Approval Organization (DAO). If approved by the DAO, the approval
must include the DAO-authorized signature.

(j) Related Information

    (1) Refer to Mandatory Continuing Airworthiness Information
(MCAI) Canadian Airworthiness Directive CF-2014-10R1, dated May 4,
2016, for related information. This MCAI may be found in the AD
docket on the Internet at http://www.regulations.gov by searching
for and locating Docket No. FAA-2016-9190.
    (2) For service information identified in this AD, contact
Bombardier, Inc., 400 C[ocirc]te-Vertu Road West, Dorval,
Qu[eacute]bec H4S 1Y9, Canada; Widebody Customer Response Center
North America toll-free telephone 1-866-538-1247 or direct-dial
telephone 1-514-855-2999; fax<PHONE_NUMBER>; email
<EMAIL_ADDRESS>Internet http://www.bombardier.com. You
may view this service information at the FAA, Transport Airplane
Directorate, 1601 Lind Avenue SW., Renton, WA. For information on
the availability of this material at the FAA, call<PHONE_NUMBER>.

    Issued in Renton, Washington, on October 12, 2016.
Michael Kaszycki,
Acting Manager, Transport Airplane Directorate, Aircraft Certification
Service.
[FR Doc. 2016-25351 Filed 10-21-16; 8:45 am]
 BILLING CODE 4910-13-P


[Federal Register Volume 80, Number 93 (Thursday, May 14, 2015)]
[Notices]
[Page 27691]
[FR Doc No: 2015-11608]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES

Food and Drug Administration

[Docket No. FDA-2011-N-0509]

Agency Information Collection Activities; Announcement of Office
of Management and Budget Approval; Dispute Resolution Procedures for
Science Based Decisions on Products Regulated by the Center for
Veterinary Medicine

AGENCY: Food and Drug Administration, HHS.

ACTION: Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Food and Drug Administration (FDA) is announcing that a
collection of information entitled, ``Dispute Resolution Procedures for
Science Based Decisions on Products Regulated by the Center for
Veterinary Medicine'' has been approved by the Office of Management and
Budget (OMB) under the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: FDA PRA Staff, Office of Operations,
Food and Drug Administration, 8455 Colesville Rd., COLE-14526, Silver
Spring, MD 20993-0002<EMAIL_ADDRESS>
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: On February 18, 2015, the Agency submitted a
proposed collection of information entitled, ``Dispute Resolution
Procedures for Science Based Decisions on Products Regulated by the
Center for Veterinary Medicine'' to OMB for review and clearance under
44 U.S.C. 3507. An Agency may not conduct or sponsor, and a person is
not required to respond to, a collection of information unless it
displays a currently valid OMB control number. OMB has now approved the
information collection and has assigned OMB control number 0910-0566.
The approval expires on April 30, 2018. A copy of the supporting
statement for this information collection is available on the Internet
at http://www.reginfo.gov/public/do/PRAMain.

    Dated: May 6, 2015.
Leslie Kux,
Associate Commissioner for Policy.
[FR Doc. 2015-11608 Filed 5-13-15; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4164-01-P