[Federal Register Volume 76, Number 155 (Thursday, August 11, 2011)]
[Notices]
[Pages 49763-49764]
[FR Doc No: 2011-20428]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission

[Docket No. CP11-520-000]

Northwest Pipeline GP; Notice of Request Under Blanket
Authorization

    Take notice that on July 26, 2011, Northwest Pipeline GP
(Northwest), 295 Chipeta Way, Salt Lake City, Utah 84108, filed a prior
notice request pursuant to sections 157.205, 157.208, and 157.210 of
the Commission's regulations under the Natural Gas Act (NGA) and
Northwest's blanket certificate issued in Docket No. CP82-433-000 for
authorization to replace, construct and operate certain mainline
pipeline facilities (North Seattle Delivery Lateral Expansion Project)
located in Snohomish County, Washington to provide 84,200 dekatherms
per day of new delivery capacity for Puget Sound Energy Inc. (Puget).
Specifically, Northwest proposes to replace 2.2 miles of 8-inch
diameter pipeline on the North Seattle Delivery Lateral with new 20-
inch diameter pipeline, modify a meter station, and install
miscellaneous appurtenances at a cost of approximately $12.8 million
for which Northwest will be reimbursed by Puget through a facilities
charge, all as more fully set forth in the application, which is on
file with the Commission and open to public inspection.
    The filing may also be viewed on the Web at http://www.ferc.gov
using the ``eLibrary'' link. Enter the docket number excluding the last
three digits in the docket number field to access the document. For
assistance, contact FERC at<EMAIL_ADDRESS>or call toll-
free,<PHONE_NUMBER> or TTY,<PHONE_NUMBER>.
    Any questions regarding this prior notice should be directed to Pam
Barnes, Manager, Certificates and Tariffs, at<PHONE_NUMBER>, Northwest
Pipeline GP, P.O. Box 58900, Salt Lake City, Utah 84158-0900, or by e-
mail<EMAIL_ADDRESS>    Any person may, within 60 days after the issuance of the instant
notice by the Commission, file pursuant to Rule 214 of the Commission's
Procedural Rules (18 CFR 385.214) a motion to intervene or notice of
intervention. Any person filing to intervene or the Commission's staff
may, pursuant to section 157.205 of the Commission's regulations under
the NGA (18 CFR 157.205) file a protest to the request. If no protest
is filed within the time allowed, the proposed activity shall be deemed
to be authorized effective the day after the time allowed for protest.
If a protest is filed and not withdrawn within 30 days after the time
allowed for filing a protest, the instant request shall be treated as
an application for authorization pursuant to section 7 of the NGA.
    The Commission strongly encourages electronic filings of comments,
protests, and interventions via the Internet in lieu of paper. See 18
CFR 385.2001(a)(1)(iii) and the instructions on the Commission's Web
site (http://

www.ferc.gov) under the ``e-Filing'' link. Persons unable to file
electronically should submit an original and 7 copies of the protest or
intervention to the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission, 888 First
Street, NE., Washington, DC 20426.

    Dated: August 5, 2011.
Kimberly D. Bose,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2011-20428 Filed 8-10-11; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6717-01-P


[Federal Register Volume 86, Number 54 (Tuesday, March 23, 2021)]
[Proposed Rules]
[Pages 15445-15447]
[FR Doc No: 2021-05854]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION

Federal Aviation Administration

14 CFR Part 71

[Docket No. FAA-2021-0176; Airspace Docket No. 21-ACE-8]
RIN 2120-AA66

Proposed Amendment of Class D and E Airspace; Sioux City, IA

AGENCY: Federal Aviation Administration (FAA), DOT.

ACTION: Notice of proposed rulemaking (NPRM).

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: This action proposes to amend the Class D and Class E airspace
at Sioux Gateway Airport/Brigadier General Bud Day Field, Sioux City,
IA. The FAA is proposing this action as the result of an airspace
review caused by the decommissioning of the Sioux City VHF
omnidirectional range (VOR) navigation aid as part of the VOR Minimum
Operational Network (MON) Program. The name and geographic coordinates
of the airport would also be updated to coincide with the FAA's
aeronautical database.

DATES: Comments must be received on or before May 7, 2021.

ADDRESSES: Send comments on this proposal to the U.S. Department of
Transportation, Docket Operations, West Building Ground Floor, Room
W12-140, 1200 New Jersey Avenue SE, Washington, DC 20590; telephone
(202) 366-9826, or<PHONE_NUMBER>. You must identify FAA Docket No.
FAA-2021-0176/Airspace Docket No. 21-ACE-8 at the beginning of your
comments. You may also submit comments through the internet at https://www.regulations.gov. You may review the public docket containing the
proposal, any comments received, and any final disposition in person in
the Dockets Office between 9:00 a.m. and 5:00 p.m., Monday through
Friday, except federal holidays.
    FAA Order 7400.11E, Airspace Designations and Reporting Points, and
subsequent amendments can be viewed online at https://www.faa.gov/air_traffic/publications/. For further information, you can contact the
Airspace Policy Group, Federal Aviation Administration, 800
Independence Avenue SW, Washington, DC 20591; telephone: (202) 267-
8783. The Order is also available for inspection at the National
Archives and Records Administration (NARA). For information on the
availability of FAA Order 7400.11E at NARA, email:
<EMAIL_ADDRESS>or go to https://www.archives.gov/federal-register/cfr/ibr-locations.html.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Jeffrey Claypool, Federal Aviation
Administration, Operations Support Group, Central Service Center, 10101
Hillwood Parkway, Fort Worth, TX 76177; telephone<PHONE_NUMBER>.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

Authority for This Rulemaking

    The FAA's authority to issue rules regarding aviation safety is
found in Title 49 of the United States Code. Subtitle I, Section 106
describes the authority of the FAA Administrator. Subtitle VII,
Aviation Programs, describes in more detail the scope of the agency's
authority. This rulemaking is promulgated under the authority described
in Subtitle VII, Part A, Subpart I, Section 40103. Under that section,
the FAA is charged with prescribing regulations to assign the use of
airspace necessary to ensure the safety of aircraft and the efficient
use of airspace. This regulation is within the scope of that authority
as it would amend the Class D airspace, the Class E surface airspace,
and the Class E airspace extending upward from 700 feet above the
surface at Sioux Gateway Airport/Brigadier General Bud Day Field, Sioux
City, IA, to support instrument flight rule operations at this airport.

Comments Invited

    Interested parties are invited to participate in this proposed
rulemaking by submitting such written data, views, or arguments, as
they may desire. Comments that provide the factual basis supporting the
views and suggestions presented are particularly helpful in developing
reasoned regulatory decisions on the proposal. Comments are
specifically invited on the overall regulatory, aeronautical, economic,
environmental, and energy-related aspects of the proposal.
Communications should identify both docket numbers and be submitted in
triplicate to the address listed above. Commenters wishing the FAA to
acknowledge receipt of their comments on this notice must submit with
those comments a self-addressed, stamped postcard on which the
following statement is made: ``Comments to Docket No. FAA-2021-0176/
Airspace Docket No. 21-ACE-8.'' The postcard will be date/time stamped
and returned to the commenter.
    All communications received before the specified closing date for
comments will be considered before taking action on the proposed rule.
The proposal contained in this notice may be changed in light of the
comments received. A report summarizing each substantive public contact
with FAA personnel concerned with this rulemaking will be filed in the
docket.

Availability of NPRMs

    An electronic copy of this document may be downloaded through the
internet at https://www.regulations.gov. Recently published rulemaking
documents can also be accessed through the FAA's web page at https://www.faa.gov/air_traffic/publications/airspace_amendments/.
    You may review the public docket containing the proposal, any
comments received, and any final disposition in person in the Dockets
Office (see the ADDRESSES section for the address and phone number)
between 9:00 a.m. and 5:00 p.m., Monday through Friday, except federal
holidays. An informal docket may also be examined during normal
business hours at the Federal Aviation Administration, Air Traffic
Organization, Central Service Center, Operations Support Group, 10101
Hillwood Parkway, Fort Worth, TX 76177.

Availability and Summary of Documents for Incorporation by Reference

    This document proposes to amend FAA Order 7400.11E, Airspace
Designations and Reporting Points, dated July 21, 2020, and effective
September 15, 2020. FAA Order 7400.11E is publicly available as listed
in the ADDRESSES section of this document. FAA Order 7400.11E lists
Class A, B, C, D, and E airspace areas, air traffic service routes, and
reporting points.

The Proposal

    The FAA is proposing an amendment to 14 CFR part 71 by:
    Amending the Class D airspace at Sioux Gateway Airport/Brigadier
General Bud Day Field, Sioux City, IA,

by adding an extension 1 mile each side of the 001[deg] bearing from
the airport extending from the 4.3-mile radius to 4.4 miles north of
the airport; updating the name (previously Sioux Gateway/Col. Bud Day
Field) and geographic coordinates of the airport to coincide with the
FAA's aeronautical database; removing the cities associated with the
airports to comply with changes to FAA Order 7400.2M, Procedures for
Handling Airspace Matters; and updating the outdated term ``Airport/
Facility Directory'' to ``Chart Supplement'';
    Amending the Class E surface airspace at Sioux Gateway Airport/
Brigadier General Bud Day Field by adding an extension 1 mile each side
of the 001[deg] bearing from the airport extending from the 4.3-mile
radius to 4.4 miles north of the airport; updating the name (previously
Sioux Gateway/Col. Bud Day Field) and geographic coordinates of the
airport to coincide with the FAA's aeronautical database; removing the
cities associated with the airports to comply with changes to FAA Order
7400.2M; and updating the outdated term ``Airport/Facility Directory''
to ``Chart Supplement'';
    And amending the Class E airspace extending upward from 700 feet
above the surface at Sioux Gateway Airport/Brigadier General Bud Day
Field by removing the Sioux City VORTAC and associated extension from
the airspace legal description; amending the extension northwest of the
airport to within 3.9 miles (reduced from 4 miles) either side of the
316[deg] (previously 001[deg]) bearing from the Sioux Gateway/Brig.
General Bud Day FLD: RWY 13-LOC (previously Sioux Gateway Airport/Col.
Bud Day Field) extending from the 6.8-mile radius of the Sioux Gateway
Airport/Brigadier General Bud Day Field to 14.4 miles northwest of the
Sioux Gateway Airport/Brigadier General Bud Day Field; adding an
extension 3.9-miles each side of the 316[deg] bearing from the airport
extending from the 6.8-mile radius of the airport to 7.1 miles
northwest of the airport; removing the city associated with the airport
to comply with changes to FAA Order 7400.2M; and updating the name
(previously Sioux Gateway Airport/Col. Bud Day Field) and geographic
coordinates of the airport to coincide with the FAA's aeronautical
database.
    This action is necessary due to an airspace review caused by the
decommissioning of the Sioux City VOR, which provided navigation
information for the instrument procedures this airport, as part of the
VOR MON Program.
    Class D and E airspace designations are published in paragraph
5000, 6002, and 6005, respectively, of FAA Order 7400.11E, dated July
21, 2020, and effective September 15, 2020, which is incorporated by
reference in 14 CFR 71.1. The Class D and E airspace designation listed
in this document will be published subsequently in the Order.
    FAA Order 7400.11, Airspace Designations and Reporting Points, is
published yearly and effective on September 15.

Regulatory Notices and Analyses

    The FAA has determined that this regulation only involves an
established body of technical regulations for which frequent and
routine amendments are necessary to keep them operationally current, is
non-controversial and unlikely to result in adverse or negative
comments. It, therefore: (1) Is not a ``significant regulatory action''
under Executive Order 12866; (2) is not a ``significant rule'' under
DOT Regulatory Policies and Procedures (44 FR 11034; February 26,
1979); and (3) does not warrant preparation of a regulatory evaluation
as the anticipated impact is so minimal. Since this is a routine matter
that will only affect air traffic procedures and air navigation, it is
certified that this rule, when promulgated, would not have a
significant economic impact on a substantial number of small entities
under the criteria of the Regulatory Flexibility Act.

Environmental Review

    This proposal will be subject to an environmental analysis in
accordance with FAA Order 1050.1F, ``Environmental Impacts: Policies
and Procedures'' prior to any FAA final regulatory action.

List of Subjects in 14 CFR Part 71

    Airspace, Incorporation by reference, Navigation (air).

The Proposed Amendment

    Accordingly, pursuant to the authority delegated to me, the Federal
Aviation Administration proposes to amend 14 CFR 71 as follows:

PART 71--DESIGNATION OF CLASS A, B, C, D, AND E AIRSPACE AREAS; AIR
TRAFFIC SERVICE ROUTES; AND REPORTING POINTS

0
1. The authority citation for 14 CFR 71 continues to read as follows:

    Authority: 49 U.S.C. 106(f), 106(g); 40103, 40113, 40120; E.O.
10854, 24 FR 9565, 3 CFR, 1959-1963 Comp., p. 389.

Sec.  71.1  [Amended]

0
2. The incorporation by reference in 14 CFR 71.1 of FAA Order 7400.11E,
Airspace Designations and Reporting Points, dated July 21, 2020, and
effective September 15, 2020, is amended as follows:

Paragraph 5000 Class D Airspace.

* * * * *

ACE IA D Sioux City, IA [Amended]

Sioux Gateway Airport/Brigadier General Bud Day Field, IA
    (Lat. 42[deg]24'09'' N, long. 96[deg]23'05'' W)
Martin Field, NE
    (Lat. 42[deg]27'15'' N, long. 96[deg]28'21'' W)

    That airspace extending upward from the surface to and including
3,600 feet MSL within a 4.3-mile radius of Sioux Gateway Airport/
Brigadier General Bud Day Field excluding that airspace within a 1-
mile radius of Martin Field, and within 1 mile either side of the
001[deg] bearing from the Sioux Gateway Airport/Brigadier General
Bud Day Field extending from the 4.3-mile radius of Sioux Gateway
Airport/Brigadier General Bud Day Field to 4.4 miles north of the
Sioux Gateway Airport/Brigadier General Bud Day Field. This Class D
airspace area is effective during the specific dates and times
established in advance by a Notice to Airmen. The effective date and
time will thereafter be continuously published in the Chart
Supplement.

Paragraph 6002 Class E Surface Airspace.

* * * * *

ACE IA E2 Sioux City, IA [Amended]

Sioux Gateway Airport/Brigadier General Bud Day Field, IA
    (Lat. 42[deg]24'09'' N, long. 96[deg]23'05'' W)
Martin Field, NE
    (Lat. 42[deg]27'15'' N, long. 96[deg]28'21'' W)

    That airspace within a 4.3-mile radius of Sioux Gateway Airport/
Brigadier General Bud Day Field, excluding that airspace within a 1-
mile radius of Martin Field, and within 1 mile either side of the
001[deg] bearing from the Sioux Gateway Airport/Brigadier General
Bud Day Field extending from the 4.3-mile radius of Sioux Gateway
Airport/Brigadier General Bud Day Field to 4.4 miles north of the
Sioux Gateway Airport/Brigadier General Bud Day Field. This Class E
airspace area is effective during the specific dates and times
established in advance by a Notice to Airmen. The effective date and
time will thereafter be continuously published in the Chart
Supplement.

Paragraph 6005 Class E Airspace Areas Extending Upward From 700
Feet or More Above the Surface of the Earth.

* * * * *

ACE IA E5 Sioux City, IA [Amended]

Sioux Gateway Airport/Brigadier General Bud Day Field, IA
    (Lat. 42[deg]24'09'' N, long. 96[deg]23'05'' W)
Sioux Gateway/Brig. General Bud Day FLD: RWY 13-LOC
    (Lat. 42[deg]23'21'' N, long. 96[deg]22'17'' W)

    That airspace extending upward from 700 feet above the surface
within a 6.8-mile

radius of Sioux Gateway Airport/Brigadier General Bud Day Field, and
within 3.9 miles each side of the 316[deg] bearing from Sioux
Gateway/Brig. General Bud Day FLD: RWY 13-LOC extending from the
6.8-mile radius of the Sioux Gateway Airport/Brigadier General Bud
Day Field to 14.4 miles northwest of the Sioux Gateway Airport/
Brigadier General Bud Day Field, and within 3.9 miles each side of
the 316[deg] bearing from the airport extending from the 6.8-mile
radius of the airport to 7.1 miles northwest of the airport.

    Issued in Fort Worth, Texas, on March 17, 2021.
Martin A. Skinner,
Acting Manager, Operations Support Group, ATO Central Service Center.
[FR Doc. 2021-05854 Filed 3-22-21; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910-13-P


[Federal Register Volume 80, Number 15 (Friday, January 23, 2015)]
[Proposed Rules]
[Pages 3527-3530]
[FR Doc No: 2015-00962]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION

Federal Aviation Administration

14 CFR Part 39

[Docket No. FAA-2015-0075; Directorate Identifier 2014-NM-202-AD]
RIN 2120-AA64

Airworthiness Directives; The Boeing Company Airplanes

AGENCY: Federal Aviation Administration (FAA), DOT.

ACTION: Notice of proposed rulemaking (NPRM).

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: We propose to supersede Airworthiness Directive (AD) 2013-26-
08, which applies to certain The Boeing Company Model 737-600, -700, -
700C, -800, -900, and -900ER series airplanes. AD 2013-26-08 currently
requires inspecting the orientation of both sides of the coil cord
connector keyways of the number 2 windows on the flight deck; re-
clocking the connector keyways, if necessary; and replacing the coil
cord assemblies on both number 2 windows on the flight deck. Since we
issued AD 2013-26-08, we have determined that additional airplanes are
subject to the identified unsafe condition. This proposed AD would add
airplanes to the applicability. We are proposing this AD

to prevent arcing, smoke, and fire in the flight deck, which could lead
to injuries to or incapacitation of the flightcrew.

DATES: We must receive comments on this proposed AD by March 9, 2015.

ADDRESSES: You may send comments, using the procedures found in 14 CFR
11.43 and 11.45, by any of the following methods:
     Federal eRulemaking Portal: Go to http://www.regulations.gov. Follow the instructions for submitting comments.
     Fax:<PHONE_NUMBER>.
     Mail: U.S. Department of Transportation, Docket
Operations, M-30, West Building Ground Floor, Room W12-140, 1200 New
Jersey Avenue SE., Washington, DC 20590.
     Hand Delivery: Deliver to Mail address above between 9
a.m. and 5 p.m., Monday through Friday, except Federal holidays.
    For service information identified in this proposed AD, contact
Boeing Commercial Airplanes, Attention: Data & Services Management,
P.O. Box 3707, MC 2H-65, Seattle, WA 98124-2207; telephone 206-544-
5000, extension 1; fax<PHONE_NUMBER>; Internet https://www.myboeingfleet.com. You may view this service information at the
FAA, Transport Airplane Directorate, 1601 Lind Avenue SW., Renton, WA.
For information on the availability of this material at the FAA, call
425-227-1221.

Examining the AD Docket

    You may examine the AD docket on the Internet at http://www.regulations.gov by searching for and locating Docket No. FAA-2015-
0075; or in person at the Docket Management Facility between 9 a.m. and
5 p.m., Monday through Friday, except Federal holidays. The AD docket
contains this proposed AD, the regulatory evaluation, any comments
received, and other information. The street address for the Docket
Office (phone:<PHONE_NUMBER>) is in the ADDRESSES section. Comments will
be available in the AD docket shortly after receipt.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Frank Carreras, Aerospace Engineer,
Systems and Equipment Branch, ANM-130S, FAA, Seattle Aircraft
Certification Office (ACO), 1601 Lind Avenue SW., Renton, WA 98057-
3356; phone:<PHONE_NUMBER>; fax:<PHONE_NUMBER>; email:
<EMAIL_ADDRESS>
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

Comments Invited

    We invite you to send any written relevant data, views, or
arguments about this proposed AD. Send your comments to an address
listed under the ADDRESSES section. Include ``Docket No. FAA-2015-0075;
Directorate Identifier 2014-NM-202-AD'' at the beginning of your
comments. We specifically invite comments on the overall regulatory,
economic, environmental, and energy aspects of this proposed AD. We
will consider all comments received by the closing date and may amend
this proposed AD because of those comments.
    We will post all comments we receive, without change, to http://www.regulations.gov, including any personal information you provide. We
will also post a report summarizing each substantive verbal contact we
receive about this proposed AD.

Discussion

    On December 20, 2013, we issued AD 2013-26-08, Amendment 39-17717
(79 FR 545, January 6, 2014), for certain The Boeing Company Model 737-
600, -700, -700C, -800, -900, and -900ER series airplanes. AD 2013-26-
08 requires inspecting the orientation of both sides of the coil cord
connector keyways of the number 2 windows on the flight deck; re-
clocking the connector keyways, if necessary; and replacing the coil
cord assemblies on both number 2 windows on the flight deck. AD 2013-
26-08 resulted from reports of arcing and smoke at the left number 2
window in the flight deck. We issued AD 2013-26-08 to prevent arcing,
smoke, and fire in the flight deck, which could lead to injuries to or
incapacitation of the flightcrew.

Actions Since AD 2013-26-08, Amendment 39-17717 (79 FR 545, January 6,
2014) Was Issued

    In AD 2013-26-08, Amendment 39-17717 (79 FR 545, January 6, 2014),
a commenter to the SNPRM (77 FR 41931, July 17, 2012) requested that we
add additional airplanes to the applicability. We determined that
further delay of AD 2013-26-08 was not appropriate in light of the
identified unsafe condition that existed on the airplanes specified in
the applicability of AD 2013-26-08. We stated that we might consider
additional rulemaking in the future. We now have determined that
further rulemaking is indeed necessary, and this proposed AD follows
from that determination.

FAA's Determination

    We are proposing this AD because we evaluated all the relevant
information and determined the unsafe condition described previously is
likely to exist or develop in other products of the same type design.

Proposed AD Requirements

    This proposed AD would retain all requirements of AD 2013-26-08,
Amendment 39-17717 (79 FR 545, January 6, 2014). This proposed AD would
add Group 3 airplanes, as identified in Boeing Special Attention
Service Bulletin 737-30-1058, Revision 5, dated April 24, 2013, to the
applicability.

Costs of Compliance

    We estimate that this proposed AD affects 718 airplanes of U.S.
registry.
    We estimate the following costs to comply with this proposed AD:

                                                                     Estimated Costs
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
                                                                                Number of
                Action                           Labor cost             Parts cost        Cost per product         airplanes     Cost on U.S. operators
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Keyway inspection and installation     6 work[dash]hours x $85 per            $1,608  $2,118..................             712  $1,508,016.
 (Group1, Configuration 1 airplanes)    hour = $510.
 [actions retained from AD
 2013[dash]26[dash]08, Amendment
 39[dash]17717 (79 FR 545, January 6,
 2014)].
Adjustment of receptacles (Group 1,    4 work-hours x $85 per hour =              $0  $340....................             410  $139,400.
 Configuration 2, Group 2, and Group    $340.
 3 airplanes) [actions retained from
 AD 2013[dash]26[dash]08, Amendment
 39[dash]17717 (79 FR 545, January 6,
 2014)].

Coil cord inspection (Group 1,         1 work-hour x $85 per hour =               $0  $85 per coil cord.......             404  $34,340 per coil cord.
 Configuration 3, and Group 2           $85 per coil cord.
 airplanes) [actions retained from AD
 2013[dash]26[dash]08, Amendment
 39[dash]17717 (79 FR 545, January 6,
 2014)].
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

    We estimate the following costs to do any necessary replacements
that would be required based on the results of the proposed inspection.
We have no way of determining the number of aircraft that might need
these replacements:

                                               On-Condition Costs
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
               Action                         Labor cost                Parts cost           Cost per product
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Replacement........................  3 work-hours x $85 per hour  $1,735 per coil cord    $1,990 per coil cord
                                      = $255 per coil cord         assembly.               assembly.
                                      assembly.
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

    According to the manufacturer, some of the costs of this AD may be
covered under warranty, thereby reducing the cost impact on affected
individuals. We do not control warranty coverage for affected
individuals. As a result, we have included all costs in our cost
estimate.

Authority for This Rulemaking

    Title 49 of the United States Code specifies the FAA's authority to
issue rules on aviation safety. Subtitle I, Section 106, describes the
authority of the FAA Administrator. Subtitle VII, Aviation Programs,
describes in more detail the scope of the Agency's authority.
    We are issuing this rulemaking under the authority described in
Subtitle VII, Part A, Subpart III, Section 44701, ``General
requirements.'' Under that section, Congress charges the FAA with
promoting safe flight of civil aircraft in air commerce by prescribing
regulations for practices, methods, and procedures the Administrator
finds necessary for safety in air commerce. This regulation is within
the scope of that authority because it addresses an unsafe condition
that is likely to exist or develop on products identified in this
rulemaking action.

Regulatory Findings

    We have determined that this proposed AD would not have federalism
implications under Executive Order 13132. This proposed AD would not
have a substantial direct effect on the States, on the relationship
between the national Government and the States, or on the distribution
of power and responsibilities among the various levels of government.
    For the reasons discussed above, I certify that the proposed
regulation:
    (1) Is not a ``significant regulatory action'' under Executive
Order 12866,
    (2) Is not a ``significant rule'' under the DOT Regulatory Policies
and Procedures (44 FR 11034, February 26, 1979),
    (3) Will not affect intrastate aviation in Alaska, and
    (4) Will not have a significant economic impact, positive or
negative, on a substantial number of small entities under the criteria
of the Regulatory Flexibility Act.

List of Subjects in 14 CFR Part 39

    Air transportation, Aircraft, Aviation safety, Incorporation by
reference, Safety.

The Proposed Amendment

    Accordingly, under the authority delegated to me by the
Administrator, the FAA proposes to amend 14 CFR part 39 as follows:

PART 39--AIRWORTHINESS DIRECTIVES

0
1. The authority citation for part 39 continues to read as follows:

    Authority:  49 U.S.C. 106(g), 40113, 44701.

Sec.  39.13  [Amended]

0
2. The FAA amends Sec.  39.13 by removing Airworthiness Directive (AD)
2013-26-08, Amendment 39-17717 (79 FR 545, January 6, 2014), and adding
the following new AD:

The Boeing Company: Docket No. FAA-2015-0075; Directorate Identifier
2014-NM-202-AD.

(a) Comments Due Date

    The FAA must receive comments on this AD action by March 9,
2015.

(b) Affected ADs

    This AD replaces AD 2013-26-08, Amendment 39-17717 (79 FR 545,
January 6, 2014).

(c) Applicability

    This AD applies to The Boeing Company Model 737-600, -700, -
700C, -800, -900, and -900ER series airplanes, certificated in any
category, as identified in Boeing Special Attention Service Bulletin
737-30-1058, Revision 5, dated April 24, 2013.

 (d) Subject

    Air Transport Association (ATA) of America Code 30, Ice and Rain
Protection.

(e) Unsafe Condition

    This AD was prompted by reports of arcing and smoke at the left
number 2 window in the flight deck. We are issuing this AD to
prevent arcing, smoke, and fire in the flight deck, which could lead
to injuries to or incapacitation of the flightcrew.

(f) Compliance

    Comply with this AD within the compliance times specified,
unless already done.

(g) Retained Inspection and Replacement for Group 1, Configuration 1,
Airplanes

    This paragraph restates the requirements of paragraph (g) of AD
2013-26-08, Amendment 39-17717 (79 FR 545, January 6, 2014), with no
changes. For airplanes identified as Group 1, Configuration 1, in
Boeing Special Attention Service Bulletin 737-30-1058, Revision 5,
dated April 24, 2013: Within 48 months after February 10, 2014 (the
effective date of AD 2013-26-08), do the actions specified in
paragraphs (g)(1) and (g)(2) of this AD.
    (1) Do a general visual inspection of the orientation of the
coil cord connector keyways on the captain's and first officer's
sides of the flight compartment, in accordance with the
Accomplishment Instructions of Boeing Special Attention Service
Bulletin 737-30-1058, Revision 5, dated April 24, 2013, except as
specified in

paragraph (k) of this AD. If the orientation is not at the specified
position, before further flight, turn the receptacle connector to
the correct position, in accordance with the Accomplishment
Instructions of Boeing Special Attention Service Bulletin 737-30-
1058, Revision 5, dated April 24, 2013, except as specified in
paragraph (k) of this AD.
    (2) Replace the coil cords with new coil cords on both sides of
the flight deck, in accordance with the Accomplishment Instructions
of Boeing Special Attention Service Bulletin 737-30-1058, Revision
5, dated April 24, 2013, except as specified in paragraph (k) of
this AD.

(h) Retained Receptacle Replacement for Group 1, Configuration 2, and
Group 2, Configuration 1 Airplanes

    This paragraph restates the requirements of paragraph (h) of AD
2013-26-08, Amendment 39-17717 (79 FR 545, January 6, 2014), with no
changes. For airplanes identified as Group 1, Configuration 2, and
Group 2, Configuration 1, in Boeing Special Attention Service
Bulletin 737-30-1058, Revision 5, dated April 24, 2013: Within 48
months after February 10, 2014 (the effective date of AD 2013-26-
08), install the receptacle connector with changed keyway position
on both sides of the flight deck, in accordance with the
Accomplishment Instructions of Boeing Special Attention Service
Bulletin 737-30-1058, Revision 5, dated April 24, 2013, except as
specified in paragraph (k) of this AD.

(i) Retained Coil Cord Inspection and Corrective Action

    This paragraph restates the requirements of paragraph (i) of AD
2013-26-08, Amendment 39-17717 (79 FR 545, January 6, 2014), with no
changes. For airplanes identified as Group 1, Configuration 3, and
Group 2, Configuration 2, in Boeing Special Attention Service
Bulletin 737-30-1058, Revision 5, dated April 24, 2013: Within 48
months after February 10, 2014 (the effective date of AD 2013-26-
08), do a general visual inspection for rubbing damage of the coil
cord on the captain's and first officer's sides of the flight
compartment, in accordance with the Accomplishment Instructions of
Boeing Special Attention Service Bulletin 737-30-1058, Revision 5,
dated April 24, 2013, except as specified in paragraph (k) of this
AD. If any rubbing damage is found: Before further flight, replace
the coil cord with a new coil cord, in accordance with the
Accomplishment Instructions of Boeing Special Attention Service
Bulletin 737-30-1058, Revision 5, dated April 24, 2013, except as
specified in paragraph (k) of this AD.

(j) New Requirements of This AD: Receptacle Replacement for Group 3
Airplanes

    For airplanes identified as Group 3 in Boeing Special Attention
Service Bulletin 737-30-1058, Revision 5, dated April 24, 2013:
Within 48 months after the effective date of this AD, install the
receptacle connector with changed keyway position on both sides of
the flight deck, in accordance with the Accomplishment Instructions
of Boeing Special Attention Service Bulletin 737-30-1058, Revision
5, dated April 24, 2013, except as specified in paragraph (k) of
this AD.

(k) Exceptions to Boeing Special Attention Service Bulletin 737-30-
1058, Revision 5, Dated April 24, 2013

    (1) This paragraph restates the provisions of paragraph (j)(1)
of AD 2013-26-08, Amendment 39-17717 (79 FR 545, January 6, 2014),
with no changes. In the circuit breaker tables of the Work
Instructions of Boeing Special Attention Service Bulletin 737-30-
1058, Revision 5, dated April 24, 2013, the panel number for circuit
breaker C00393 is incorrectly identified as ``P6-12.'' The correct
panel number reference for circuit breaker C00393, ``WINDOW HEAT
POWER RIGHT SIDE,'' is P6-11.
    (2) This paragraph restates the provisions of paragraph (j)(2)
of AD 2013-26-08, Amendment 39-17717 (79 FR 545, January 6, 2014),
with no changes. In paragraph 3.B. of the Work Instructions of
Boeing Special Attention Service Bulletin 737-30-1058, Revision 5,
dated April 24, 2013, the description for Part 3 of the Work
Instructions is identified as ``PART 3: RECEPTACLE CONNECTOR
POSITION CHANGE,'' which is incorrect. The correct description for
Part 3 of the Work Instructions is ``PART 3: COIL CORD INSPECTION
AND REPLACEMENT IF DAMAGE IS FOUND.''
    (3) This paragraph restates the provisions of paragraph (j)(3)
of AD 2013-26-08, Amendment 39-17717 (79 FR 545, January 6, 2014),
with no changes. In Figures 13 and 14, in paragraph 3.B. of the Work
Instructions of Boeing Special Attention Service Bulletin 737-30-
1058, Revision 5, dated April 24, 2013, the note before the step
tables misidentifies certain parts and airplane groups. The note
should read:
    NOTE: Group 1 and Group 2 airplanes have the connector
receptacle identified as D10572. Group 3 airplanes have the
connector receptacle identified as D10560. Except for Group 1
airplanes, a wire diagram change is not necessary and not shown in
this service bulletin.

(l) Credit for Previous Actions

    This paragraph restates the provisions of paragraph (k) of AD
2013-26-08, Amendment 39-17717 (79 FR 545, January 6, 2014), with no
changes. This paragraph provides credit for the replacement required
by paragraph (g)(2) of this AD, if the replacement was performed
before February 10, 2014 (the effective date of AD 2013-26-08),
using the service information specified in paragraph (l)(1), (l)(2),
(l)(3), (l)(4), or (l)(5) of this AD, provided that the actions
required by paragraph (h) of this AD are done in accordance with
Boeing Special Attention Service Bulletin 737-30-1058, Revision 4,
dated November 3, 2011; or Boeing Special Attention Service Bulletin
737-30-1058, Revision 5, dated April 24, 2013; for airplanes in
Group 1, Configuration 2, and Group 2.
    (1) Boeing Service Bulletin 737-30-1058, dated July 27, 2006,
which is not incorporated by reference in this AD.
    (2) Boeing Service Bulletin 737-30-1058, Revision 1, dated June
18, 2007, which is not incorporated by reference in this AD.
    (3) Boeing Service Bulletin 737-30-1058, Revision 2, dated
February 13, 2009, which is not incorporated by reference in this
AD.
    (4) Boeing Special Attention Service Bulletin 737-30-1058,
Revision 3, dated July 7, 2010, which is not incorporated by
reference in this AD.
    (5) Boeing Special Attention Service Bulletin 737-30-1058,
Revision 4, dated November 3, 2011.

 (m) Alternative Methods of Compliance (AMOCs)

    (1) The Manager, Seattle Aircraft Certification Office (ACO),
FAA, has the authority to approve AMOCs for this AD, if requested
using the procedures found in 14 CFR 39.19. In accordance with 14
CFR 39.19, send your request to your principal inspector or local
Flight Standards District Office, as appropriate. If sending
information directly to the manager of the ACO, send it to the
attention of the person identified in paragraph (n)(1) of this AD.
Information may be emailed to<EMAIL_ADDRESS>    (2) Before using any approved AMOC, notify your appropriate
principal inspector, or lacking a principal inspector, the manager
of the local flight standards district office/certificate holding
district office.
    (3) AMOCs approved for AD 2013-26-08, Amendment 39-17717 (79 FR
545, January 6, 2014), are approved as AMOCs for the corresponding
provisions of this AD.
    (4) For airplanes identified as Group 3 in Boeing Special
Attention Service Bulletin 737-30-1058, Revision 5, dated April 24,
2013, AMOCs approved for the actions required by paragraph (h) of AD
2013-26-08, Amendment 39-17717 (79 FR 545, January 6, 2014), are
approved as AMOCs for the corresponding provisions of paragraph (j)
of this AD.

(n) Related Information

    (1) For more information about this AD, contact Frank Carreras,
Aerospace Engineer, Systems and Equipment Branch, ANM-130S, FAA,
Seattle Aircraft Certification Office (ACO), 1601 Lind Avenue SW.,
Renton, WA 98057-3356; phone:<PHONE_NUMBER>; fax:<PHONE_NUMBER>;
email<EMAIL_ADDRESS>    (2) For service information identified in this AD, contact
Boeing Commercial Airplanes, Attention: Data & Services Management,
P. O. Box 3707, MC 2H-65, Seattle, WA 98124-2207; telephone 206-544-
5000, extension 1; fax<PHONE_NUMBER>; Internet https://www.myboeingfleet.com. You may view this referenced service
information at the FAA, Transport Airplane Directorate, 1601 Lind
Avenue SW., Renton, WA. For information on the availability of this
material at the FAA, call<PHONE_NUMBER>.

    Issued in Renton, Washington, on January 14, 2015.
John P. Piccola, Jr.,
Acting Manager, Transport Airplane Directorate, Aircraft Certification
Service.
[FR Doc. 2015-00962 Filed 1-22-15; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910-13-P


[Federal Register Volume 87, Number 220 (Wednesday, November 16, 2022)]
[Notices]
[Page 68687]
[FR Doc No: 2022-24931]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission

[Project No. 14979-001]

Lock\+TM\ Hydro Friends Fund XXVII, LLC; Notice of Surrender of
Preliminary Permit

    Take notice that Lock\+TM\ Hydro Friends Fund XXVII, LLC, permittee
for the proposed Cowanesque Dam Hydropower Project, has requested that
its preliminary permit be terminated. The permit was issued on January
2, 2020 and would have expired on December 31, 2023.\1\ The project
would have been located at the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers' (Corps)
Cowanesque Dam on the Cowanesque River in Tioga County, Pennsylvania.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \1\ 170 FERC ] 62,002 (2020).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    The preliminary permit for Project No. 14979 will remain in effect
until the close of business, December 9, 2022. But, if the Commission
is closed on this day, then the permit remains in effect until the
close of business on the next day in which the Commission is open.\2\
New applications for this site may not be submitted until after the
permit surrender is effective.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \2\ 18 CFR 385.2007(a)(2) (2021).

    Dated: November 9, 2022.
Debbie-Anne A. Reese,
Deputy Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2022-24931 Filed 11-15-22; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6717-01-P


[Federal Register Volume 85, Number 181 (Thursday, September 17, 2020)]
[Proposed Rules]
[Pages 58010-58014]
[FR Doc No: 2020-20373]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION

Federal Aviation Administration

14 CFR Part 39

[Docket No. FAA-2020-0843; Product Identifier 2020-NM-073-AD]
RIN 2120-AA64

Airworthiness Directives; Bombardier, Inc., Airplanes

AGENCY: Federal Aviation Administration (FAA), DOT.

ACTION: Notice of proposed rulemaking (NPRM).

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The FAA proposes to adopt a new airworthiness directive (AD)
for certain Bombardier, Inc., Model BD-700-1A10 airplanes. This
proposed AD was prompted by a report of smoke and signs of an
overheating condition from the emergency light battery (ELB) due to
excessive corrosion surrounding the internal lead acid batteries, which
caused an electrical short circuit that led to the smoke and
overheating condition. This proposed AD would require an inspection to
determine the last replacement date of the ELB, and replacement if
necessary. This proposed AD would also require the incorporation of a
new maintenance task into the aircraft maintenance schedule. The FAA is
proposing this AD to address the unsafe condition on these products.

DATES: The FAA must receive comments on this proposed AD by November 2,
2020.

ADDRESSES: You may send comments, using the procedures found in 14 CFR
11.43 and 11.45, by any of the following methods:
     Federal eRulemaking Portal: Go to https://www.regulations.gov. Follow the instructions for submitting comments.

     Fax:<PHONE_NUMBER>.
     Mail: U.S. Department of Transportation, Docket
Operations, M-30, West Building Ground Floor, Room W12-140, 1200 New
Jersey Avenue SE, Washington, DC 20590.
     Hand Delivery: Deliver to Mail address above between 9
a.m. and 5 p.m., Monday through Friday, except Federal holidays.
    For service information identified in this NPRM, contact
Bombardier, Inc., 400 C[ocirc]te-Vertu Road West, Dorval, Qu[eacute]bec
H4S 1Y9, Canada; telephone<PHONE_NUMBER>; fax<PHONE_NUMBER>; email
<EMAIL_ADDRESS>internet https://www.bombardier.com. You
may view this service information at the FAA, Airworthiness Products
Section, Operational Safety Branch, 2200 South 216th St., Des Moines,
WA. For information on the availability of this material at the FAA,
call<PHONE_NUMBER>.

Examining the AD Docket

    You may examine the AD docket on the internet at https://www.regulations.gov by searching for and locating Docket No. FAA-2020-
0843; or in person at Docket Operations between 9 a.m. and 5 p.m.,
Monday through Friday, except Federal holidays. The AD docket contains
this NPRM, any comments received, and other information. The street
address for Docket Operations is listed above. Comments will be
available in the AD docket shortly after receipt.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Thomas Niczky, Aerospace Engineer,
Avionics and Electrical Systems Section, FAA, New York ACO Branch, 1600
Stewart Avenue, Suite 410, Westbury, NY 11590; telephone<PHONE_NUMBER>;
fax<PHONE_NUMBER>; email<EMAIL_ADDRESS>
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

Comments Invited

    The FAA invites you to participate in this rulemaking by submitting
written comments, data, or views about this proposal. The most helpful
comments reference a specific portion of the proposal, explain the
reason for any recommended change, and include supporting data. To
ensure the docket does not contain duplicate comments, commenters
should send only one copy of written comments, or if comments are filed
electronically, commenters should submit only one time. Send your
comments to an address listed under the ADDRESSES section. Include
``Docket No. FAA-2020-0843; Product Identifier 2020-NM-073-AD'' at the
beginning of your comments.
    Except for Confidential Business Information (CBI) as described in
the following paragraph, and other information as described in 14 CFR
11.35, the FAA will post all comments received, without change, as well
as a report summarizing each substantive public contact with FAA
personnel concerning this proposed rulemaking. Before acting on this
proposal, the FAA will consider all comments received by the closing
date for comments. The FAA will consider comments filed after the
comment period has closed if it is possible to do so without incurring
expense or delay. The FAA may change this NPRM because of those
comments.

Confidential Business Information

    CBI is commercial or financial information that is both customarily
and actually treated as private by its owner. Under the Freedom of
Information Act (FOIA) (5 U.S.C. 552), CBI is exempt from public
disclosure. If your comments responsive to this NPRM contain commercial
or financial information that is customarily treated as private, that
you actually treat as private, and that is relevant or responsive to
this NPRM, it is important that you clearly designate the submitted
comments as CBI. Please mark each page of your submission containing
CBI as ``PROPIN.'' The FAA will treat such marked submissions as
confidential under the FOIA, and they will not be placed in the public
docket of this NPRM. Submissions containing CBI should be sent to the
person identified in the FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT section. Any
commentary that the FAA receives which is not specifically designated
as CBI will be placed in the public docket for this rulemaking.

Discussion

    Transport Canada Civil Aviation (TCCA), which is the aviation
authority for Canada, has issued Canadian AD CF-2020-07, dated March
17, 2020 (referred to after this as the Mandatory Continuing
Airworthiness Information, or ``the MCAI''), to correct an unsafe
condition for certain Bombardier, Inc., Model BD-700-1A10 airplanes.
You may examine the MCAI in the AD docket on the internet at https://www.regulations.gov by searching for and locating Docket No. FAA-2020-
0843.
    This proposed AD was prompted by a report of smoke and signs of an
overheating condition from the ELB due to excessive corrosion
surrounding the internal lead acid batteries, which caused an
electrical short circuit that led to the smoke and overheating
condition. The FAA is proposing this AD to address such conditions,
which could cause fire onboard the airplane. See the MCAI for
additional background information.

Related Service Information Under 1 CFR Part 51

    Bombardier has issued Service Bulletin 700-33-024, dated May 13,
2019. This service information describes procedures for an inspection
to determine the last battery replacement date of the ELB, and
replacement if necessary.
    Bombardier also issued following service information.
     Supplemental Time Limits/Maintenance Checks (STLMC)
Temporary Revision (TR) 05-19091701, dated September 17, 2019.
     STLMC TR 05-19091704, dated September 17, 2019.
     STLMC TR 05-19091705, dated September 17, 2019.
    These documents describe amendments to the aircraft maintenance
schedule for the ELB restoration and are distinct since they apply to
different airplane serial numbers.
    This service information is reasonably available because the
interested parties have access to it through their normal course of
business or by the means identified in the ADDRESSES section.

FAA's Determination

    This product has been approved by the aviation authority of another
country, and is approved for operation in the United States. Pursuant
to our bilateral agreement with the State of Design Authority, the FAA
has been notified of the unsafe condition described in the MCAI and
service information referenced above. The FAA is proposing this AD
because the FAA evaluated all the relevant information and determined
the unsafe condition described previously is likely to exist or develop
on other products of the same type design.

Proposed Requirements of This NPRM

    This proposed AD would require accomplishing the actions specified
in Bombardier Service Bulletin 700-33-024, dated May 13, 2019,
described previously.
    This proposed AD would also require the incorporation of a new
maintenance task into the aircraft maintenance schedule.
    This proposed AD would require revisions to certain operator
maintenance documents to include new actions (e.g., inspections).
Compliance with these actions is required by 14 CFR 91.403(c). For
airplanes that have been previously modified, altered, or repaired in
the areas addressed by this proposed

AD, the operator may not be able to accomplish the actions described in
the revisions. In this situation, to comply with 14 CFR 91.403(c), the
operator must request approval for an alternative method of compliance
according to paragraph (l)(1) of this proposed AD.

Costs of Compliance

    The FAA estimates that this proposed AD affects 69 airplanes of
U.S. registry. The FAA estimates the following costs to comply with
this proposed AD:

                                      Estimated Costs for Required Actions
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
                                                                                Cost per      Cost on U.S.
                           Labor cost                               Parts cost        product        operators
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
3 work-hours x $85 per hour = $255..............................         $11,308         $11,563        $797,847
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

    The FAA has determined that revising the maintenance or inspection
program takes an average of 90 work-hours per operator, although the
FAA recognizes that this number may vary from operator to operator.
Since operators incorporate maintenance or inspection program changes
for their affected fleet(s), the FAA has determined that a per-operator
estimate is more accurate than a per-airplane estimate. Therefore, the
FAA estimates the total cost per operator to be $7,650 (90 work-hours x
$85 per work-hour).

Authority for This Rulemaking

    Title 49 of the United States Code specifies the FAA's authority to
issue rules on aviation safety. Subtitle I, section 106, describes the
authority of the FAA Administrator. Subtitle VII: Aviation Programs,
describes in more detail the scope of the Agency's authority.
    The FAA is issuing this rulemaking under the authority described in
Subtitle VII, Part A, Subpart III, Section 44701: General requirements.
Under that section, Congress charges the FAA with promoting safe flight
of civil aircraft in air commerce by prescribing regulations for
practices, methods, and procedures the Administrator finds necessary
for safety in air commerce. This regulation is within the scope of that
authority because it addresses an unsafe condition that is likely to
exist or develop on products identified in this rulemaking action.

Regulatory Findings

    The FAA determined that this proposed AD would not have federalism
implications under Executive Order 13132. This proposed AD would not
have a substantial direct effect on the States, on the relationship
between the national Government and the States, or on the distribution
of power and responsibilities among the various levels of government.
    For the reasons discussed above, I certify this proposed
regulation:
    (1) Is not a ``significant regulatory action'' under Executive
Order 12866,
    (2) Will not affect intrastate aviation in Alaska, and
    (3) Will not have a significant economic impact, positive or
negative, on a substantial number of small entities under the criteria
of the Regulatory Flexibility Act.

List of Subjects in 14 CFR Part 39

    Air transportation, Aircraft, Aviation safety, Incorporation by
reference, Safety.

The Proposed Amendment

    Accordingly, under the authority delegated to me by the
Administrator, the FAA proposes to amend 14 CFR part 39 as follows:

PART 39--AIRWORTHINESS DIRECTIVES

0
1. The authority citation for part 39 continues to read as follows:

    Authority:  49 U.S.C. 106(g), 40113, 44701.

Sec.  39.13   [Amended]

0
2. The FAA amends Sec.  39.13 by adding the following new airworthiness
directive (AD):

Bombardier, Inc.: Docket No. FAA-2020-0843; Product Identifier 2020-
NM-073-AD.

(a) Comments Due Date

    The FAA must receive comments by November 2, 2020.

(b) Affected ADs

    None.

(c) Applicability

    This AD applies to Bombardier, Inc., Model BD-700-1A10
airplanes, certificated in any category, serial numbers 9002, 9003,
9011, 9016, 9020, 9022 through 9025 inclusive, 9029, 9031, 9032,
9036, 9039 through 9044 inclusive, 9046 through 9058 inclusive, 9060
through 9065 inclusive, 9067 through 9081 inclusive, 9083 through
9106 inclusive, 9108 through 9122 inclusive, 9124 through 9126
inclusive, 9128, 9129, 9133, 9134, 9136 through 9139 inclusive, 9141
through 9148 inclusive, 9150, 9151, 9153, 9159, 9162, 9163, 9165,
and 9169.

(d) Subject

    Air Transport Association (ATA) of America Code 33, Lights.

(e) Reason

    This AD was prompted by a report of smoke and signs of an
overheating condition from the emergency light battery (ELB) due to
excessive corrosion surrounding the internal lead acid batteries,
which caused an electrical short circuit that led to the smoke and
overheating condition. The FAA is issuing this AD to address such
conditions, which could cause fire onboard the airplane.

(f) Compliance

    Comply with this AD within the compliance times specified,
unless already done.

(g) Inspection and Corrective Action

    Within 15 months after the effective date of this AD, inspect
the ELB to determine the last replacement date or the manufacturing
date, as applicable; if any date is 4 years or older, replace the
ELB before further flight. Do the actions in accordance with the
Accomplishment Instructions of Bombardier Service Bulletin 700-33-
024, dated May 13, 2019. For airplanes on which the restoration task
specified in paragraph (h) of this AD was done before the effective
date of this AD, the requirements of paragraph (g) of this AD are
not required.

(h) Maintenance or Inspection Program Revision

    Within 60 days after the effective date of this AD, revise the
existing maintenance or inspection program, as applicable, to
include the information specified in Bombardier BD-700 Supplemental
Time Limits/Maintenance Checks (STLMC) Chapter 5 task number 33-51-
54-603, ``Restoration of the Emergency Lighting Batteries (XL245-B
Emergency Battery System),'' in the Bombardier BD-700 STLMC, as
specified in the applicable temporary revision identified in figure
1 to paragraph (h) of this AD. The initial compliance time for doing
task 33-51-54-603 is at the applicable time specified in paragraph
(h)(1) or (2) of this AD. Repeat task 33-51-54-603 thereafter at the
interval specified within that task.
    (1) If both ELBs were replaced at the time of compliance with
paragraph (g) of this AD: Within 48 months after the ELB
replacement.
    (2) If neither ELB, or only one ELB, was replaced at the time of
compliance with paragraph (g) of this AD: Within 48 months after the
applicable compliance time

specified in paragraph (h)(2)(i) or (ii) of this AD.
    (i) For each ELB, use the battery replacement date, if it is
indicated.
    (ii) For each ELB, use the date of manufacture, if it does not
have a battery replacement date indicated.
[GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] TP17SE20.000

(i) Misidentified Restoration Task

    The following temporary revisions misidentified the required
restoration task as task ``33-51-54-602.''
    (1) Bombardier Global Express XRS BD-700 STLMC Temporary
Revision 05-19032701, dated March 27, 2019.
    (2) Bombardier Global Express BD-700 STLMC Temporary Revision
05-19040301, dated April 3, 2019.
    (3) Bombardier Global Express BD-700 STLMC Temporary Revision
05-19040401, dated April 4, 2019.

(j) Compliance With Restoration Task for Airplanes on Which the
Misidentified Task Was Accomplished

    For airplanes on which the restoration task specified as task
``33-51-54-602'' in the applicable temporary revision identified in
paragraph (i) of this AD was done before the effective date of this
AD:
    (1) The actions specified in paragraph (g) of this AD are not
required.
    (2) The initial accomplishment of the task specified in
paragraphs (h)(1) and (2) of this AD is not required.
    (3) Task 33-51-54-603 must be done within 48 months after task
``33-51-54-602'' was accomplished, and thereafter at the intervals
specified in task 33-51-54-603.

(k) No Alternative Actions and Intervals

    After the existing maintenance or inspection program has been
revised as required by paragraph (h) of this AD, no alternative
actions (e.g., inspections) and intervals may be used unless the
actions and intervals are approved as an alternative method of
compliance (AMOC) in accordance with the procedures specified in
paragraph (l)(1) of this AD.

(l) Other FAA AD Provisions

    The following provisions also apply to this AD:
    (1) Alternative Methods of Compliance (AMOCs): The Manager, New
York ACO Branch, FAA, has the authority to approve AMOCs for this
AD, if requested using the procedures found in 14 CFR 39.19. In
accordance with 14 CFR 39.19, send your request to your principal
inspector or local Flight Standards District Office, as appropriate.
If sending information directly to the manager of the certification
office, send it to ATTN: Program Manager, Continuing Operational
Safety, FAA, New York ACO Branch, 1600 Stewart Avenue, Suite 410,
Westbury, NY 11590; telephone<PHONE_NUMBER>; fax<PHONE_NUMBER>. Before
using any approved AMOC, notify your appropriate principal
inspector, or lacking a principal inspector, the manager of the
local flight standards district office/certificate holding district
office.
    (2) Contacting the Manufacturer: For any requirement in this AD
to obtain instructions from a manufacturer, the instructions must be
accomplished using a method approved by the Manager, New York ACO
Branch, FAA; or Transport Canada Civil Aviation (TCCA); or
Bombardier's TCCA Design Approval Organization (DAO). If approved by
the DAO, the approval must include the DAO-authorized signature.

(m) Related Information

    (1) Refer to Mandatory Continuing Airworthiness Information
(MCAI) Canadian AD CF-2020-07, dated March 17, 2020, for related
information. This MCAI may be found in the AD docket on the internet
at https://www.regulations.gov by searching for and locating Docket
No. FAA-2020-0843.
    (2) For more information about this AD, contact Thomas Niczky,
Aerospace Engineer, Avionics and Electrical Systems Section, FAA,
New York ACO Branch, 1600 Stewart Avenue, Suite 410, Westbury, NY
11590; telephone<PHONE_NUMBER>; fax<PHONE_NUMBER>; email<EMAIL_ADDRESS>    (3) For service information identified in this AD, contact
Bombardier, Inc., 400 C[ocirc]te-Vertu Road West, Dorval,
Qu[eacute]bec H4S 1Y9, Canada; telephone<PHONE_NUMBER>; fax 514-855-
7401; email<EMAIL_ADDRESS>internet https://www.bombardier.com. You may view this service information at the
FAA, Airworthiness Products Section, Operational Safety Branch, 2200
South 216th St., Des Moines, WA. For information on the availability
of this material at the FAA, call<PHONE_NUMBER>.

    Issued on September 10, 2020.
Lance T. Gant,
Director, Compliance & Airworthiness Division, Aircraft Certification
Service.
[FR Doc. 2020-20373 Filed 9-16-20; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910-13-P


[Federal Register: April 13, 2006 (Volume 71, Number 71)]
[Notices]
[Page 19183]
[DOCID:fr13ap06-76]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission

[Docket No. ER06-634-000]

Spruance Genco, LLC; Notice of Issuance of Order

April 6, 2006.
    Spruance Genco, LLC (Spruance Genco) filed an application for
market-based rate authority, with an accompanying tariff. The proposed
market-based rate tariff provides for the sale of energy, capacity and
ancillary services at market-based rates. Spruance Genco also requested
waiver of various Commission regulations. In particular, Spruance Genco
requested that the Commission grant blanket approval under 18 CFR part
34 of all future issuances of securities and assumptions of liability
by Spruance Genco.
    On April 5, 2006, pursuant to delegated authority, the Director,
Division of Tariffs and Market Development--West, granted the request
for blanket approval under part 34. The Director's order also stated
that the Commission would publish a separate notice in the Federal
Register establishing a period of time for the filing of protests.
Accordingly, any person desiring to be heard or to protest the blanket
approval of issuances of securities or assumptions of liability by
Spruance Genco should file a motion to intervene or protest with the
Federal Energy Regulatory Commission, 888 First Street, NE.,
Washington, DC 20426, in accordance with Rules 211 and 214 of the
Commission's Rules of Practice and Procedure. 18 CFR 385.211, 385.214
(2004).
    Notice is hereby given that the deadline for filing motions to
intervene or protest is May 5, 2006.
    Absent a request to be heard in opposition by the deadline above,
Spruance Genco is authorized to issue securities and assume obligations
or liabilities as a guarantor, indorser, surety, or otherwise in
respect of any security of another person; provided that such issuance
or assumption is for some lawful object within the corporate purposes
of Spruance Genco, compatible with the public interest, and is
reasonably necessary or appropriate for such purposes.
    The Commission reserves the right to require a further showing that
neither public nor private interests will be adversely affected by
continued approval of Spruance Genco's issuances of securities or
assumptions of liability.
    Copies of the full text of the Director's Order are available from
the Commission's Public Reference Room, 888 First Street, NE.,
Washington, DC 20426. The Order may also be viewed on the Commission's
Web site at http://www.ferc.gov, using the eLibrary link. Enter the

docket number excluding the last three digits in the docket number
filed to access the document. Comments, protests, and interventions may
be filed electronically via the Internet in lieu of paper. See, 18 CFR
385.2001(a)(1)(iii) and the instructions on the Commission's Web site
under the ``e-Filing'' link. The Commission strongly encourages
electronic filings.

Magalie R. Salas,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. E6-5443 Filed 4-12-06; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 6717-01-P