(iii) Net heat of combustion (MJ/kg). (A) For E0, determine net
heat of combustion using ASTM D3338/D3338M (incorporated by reference
in Sec.  600.011).
    (B) For E10, determine net heat of combustion using the following
equation, rounding the result to the nearest whole number:

NHCf = net neat of combustion of test fule = NHGH [middot] (1 - MFe) +
NHCe [middot] MFe.

Where:

MFe = mass fraction ethanol in the test fuel =
[GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] TP13MY20.014

VPe = volume percent ethanol in the test fuel as determined by ASTM
D5599-00 or ASTM D4815-13 (incorporated by reference in Sec.
600.011).
SGe = specific gravity of pure ethanol. Use
SGe = 0.7939.
SGf = specific gravity of the test fuel as determined by
ASTM D1298-12b or ASTM D4052-11 (incorporated by reference in Sec.
600.011).
NHCe = net heat of combustion of pure ethanol. Use NHCe =
11,530 Btu/lb.
NHCh = net heat of combustion of the hydrocarbon fraction of the
test fuel as determined using ASTM D3338 (incorporated by reference
in Sec.  600.011) with the following inputs, using VTier3 or VLEVIII
as appropriate:
A = aromatics content of the hydrocarbon fraction =
[GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] TP13MY20.015

G = API gravity of the hydrocarbon fraction =
[GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] TP13MY20.016

VTier3 = average volatility of the Tier 3 hydrocarbon fraction =
[GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] TP13MY20.017

VLEVIII = average volatility of the LEV III hydrocarbon fraction =
[GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] TP13MY20.018

Where:

VParo,f = volume percent aromatics in the test fuel as determined by
ASTM D1319-15 (incorporated by reference in Sec.  600.011). An
acceptable alternative method is ASTM D5769-10 (incorporated by
reference in Sec.  600.011), as long as the result is bias-corrected
as described in ASTM D1319.
SGh = specific gravity of the hydrocarbon fraction =
[GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] TP13MY20.019

T10, T50, T90 = the 10, 50, and 90 percent distillation temperatures
of the test fuel, respectively, in degrees Fahrenheit, as determined
by D86 (incorporated by reference in Sec.  600.011).
* * * * *
    (o)(1) For testing with E10, calculate fuel economy in miles per
gallon using the following equation, rounded to the nearest 0.1
miles per gallon:
[GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] TP13MY20.020

Where:

CMFtestfuel = carbon mass fraction of the test fuel,
expressed to three decimal places.
SGtestfuel = the specific gravity of the test fuel as
obtained in paragraph (f)(1) of this section, expressed to three
decimal places.
[rho]H2O = the density of pure water at 60 [deg]F. Use
[rho]H2O = 3781.69 g/gal.
SGbasefuel = the specific gravity of the 1975 base fuel.
Use SGbasefuel = 0.7394.
NHCbasefuel = net heat of combustion of the 1975 base
fuel. Use NHCbasefuel = 43.047 MJ/kg.
NMOG = NMOG emission rate over the test interval or duty cycle in
grams/mile.
CH4 = CH4 emission rate over the test interval
or duty cycle in grams/mile.
CO = CO emission rate over the test interval or duty cycle in grams/
mile.
CO2 = measured tailpipe CO2 emission rate over
the test interval or duty cycle in grams/mile.
Ra = sensitivity factor that represents the response of a
typical vehicle's fuel economy to changes in fuel properties, such
as volumetric energy content. Use Ra = 0.81.
NHCtestfuel = net heat of combustion by mass of test fuel
as obtained in paragraph (f)(1) of this section, expressed to three
decimal places.

    (2) Use one of the following methods to calculate the carbon-
related exhaust emissions for model year 2017 and later testing with
the low-level ethanol-gasoline blend test fuel specified in 40 CFR
1065.710(b):
    (i) For manufacturers not complying with the fleet averaging option
for N2O and CH4 as allowed under Sec.  86.1818 of
this chapter, calculate CREE in grams per mile using the following
equation, rounded to the nearest whole gram per mile:

CREE = (CMF/0.273 x NMOG) + (1.571 x CO) + 1.0166 x CO2 +
(0.749 x CH4)

Where:

CREE = carbon-related exhaust emissions.
NMOG = grams/mile NMOG as obtained in 40 CFR 1066.635.
CH4 = grams/mile CH4 as obtained in paragraph
(g)(2) of this section.
CO = grams/mile CO as obtained in paragraph (g)(2) of this section.
CO2 = measured tailpipe grams/mile CO2 as
obtained in paragraph (g)(2) of this section.
CMF = carbon mass fraction of test fuel as obtained in paragraph
(f)(1) of this section and rounded according to paragraph (g)(3) of
this section.

    (ii) For manufacturers complying with the fleet averaging option
for N2O and CH4 as allowed under Sec.  86.1818 of
this chapter, calculate CREE in grams per mile using the following
equation, rounded to the nearest whole gram per mile:

CREE = [(CMF/0.273) x NMOG] + (1.571 x CO) + 1.0166 x CO2 +
(298 x N2O) + (25 x CH4)

Where:

CREE means the carbon-related exhaust emissions as defined in Sec.
600.002.
NMOG = Grams/mile NMOG as obtained in 40 CFR 1066.635.
CO = Grams/mile CO as obtained in paragraph (g)(2) of this section.
CO2 = Measured tailpipe grams/mile CO2 as
obtained in paragraph (g)(2) of this section.
N2O = Grams/mile N2O as obtained in paragraph
(g)(2) of this section.
CH4 = Grams/mile CH4 as obtained in paragraph
(g)(2) of this section.
CMF = Carbon mass fraction of test fuel as obtained in paragraph
(f)(1) of this section and rounded according to paragraph (g)(3) of
this section.

    (p) Equations for fuels other than those specified in this section
may be used with advance EPA approval. Alternate calculation methods
for fuel economy and carbon-related exhaust emissions may be used in
lieu of the methods described in this section if shown to yield
equivalent or superior results and if approved in advance by the
Administrator.
0
7. Amend Sec.  600.114-12 by revising paragraphs (d)(2), (e)(3),
(f)(1), (2), and (4) to read as follows:

Sec.  600.114-12  Vehicle-specific 5-cycle fuel economy and carbon-
related exhaust emission calculations.

* * * * *
    (d) * * *
    (2) To determine the City CO2 emissions, use the
appropriate CO2 grams/mile values instead of CREE values in
the equations in this paragraph (d). For fuel economy labels generated
from E10 test data, use ``A166 CO2'' input values to the
equations in paragraph (d)(1) of this section (instead of CREE input
values), where ``A166 CO2'' emissions are equal to the
measured tailpipe CO2 emissions for the test cycle
multiplied by a factor of 1.0166 and rounded to the nearest 0.1 grams/
mile.
* * * * *
    (e) * * *
    (3) To determine the Highway CO2 emissions, use the
appropriate CO2 grams/mile values instead of CREE values in
the equations in this paragraph (e). For fuel economy labels generated
from E10 test data, use ``A166 CO2'' input values to the
equations in paragraphs (e)(1) and (2) of this section (instead of CREE
input values), where ``A166 CO2'' emissions are equal to the
measured tailpipe CO2 emissions for the test cycle
multiplied by a factor of 1.0166 and rounded to the nearest 0.1 grams/
mile.
* * * * *
    (f) * * *
    (1) Four-bag FTP equations. If the 4-bag sampling method is used,
manufacturers may use the equations in paragraphs (a) and (b) of this
section to determine city and highway CO2 and carbon-related
exhaust emissions values. For fuel economy labels generated from E10
test data, use ``A166 CO2'' input values to the equation in
paragraph (f)(1) of this section (instead of CREE input values), where
``A166 CO2'' emissions are equal to the measured tailpipe
CO2 emissions for the

test cycle multiplied by a factor of 1.0166 and rounded to the nearest
0.1 grams/mile. If this method is chosen, it must be used to determine
both city and highway CO2 emissions and carbon-related
exhaust emissions. Optionally, the following calculations may be used,
provided that they are used to determine both city and highway
CO2 and carbon-related exhaust emissions values:
* * * * *
    (2) Two-bag FTP equations. If the 2-bag sampling method is used for
the 75 [deg]F FTP test, it must be used to determine both city and
highway CO2 emissions and carbon-related exhaust emissions.
For fuel economy labels generated from E10 test data, use ``A166
CO2'' input values to the equation in paragraph (f)(2) of
this section (instead of CREE input values), where ``A166
CO2'' emissions are equal to the measured tailpipe
CO2 emissions for the test cycle multiplied by a factor of
1.0166 and rounded to the nearest 0.1 grams/mile. The following
calculations must be used to determine both city and highway
CO2 emissions and carbon-related exhaust emissions:
* * * * *
    (4) To determine the City and Highway CO2 emissions, use
the appropriate CO2 grams/mile values instead of CREE values
in the equations in paragraphs (f)(1) through (3) of this section. For
fuel economy labels generated from E10 test data, use ``A166
CO2'' input values to the equations in paragraphs (f)(1)
through (3) of this section (instead of CREE input values), where
``A166 CO2'' emissions are equal to the measured tailpipe
CO2 emissions for the test cycle multiplied by a factor of
1.0166 and rounded to the nearest 0.1 grams/mile.
* * * * *
0
8. Revise Sec.  600.117 to read as follows:

Sec.  600.117  Interim provisions.

    The following provisions apply if manufacturers demonstrate
compliance with greenhouse gas emission standards and determine fuel
economy values using E0 gasoline test fuel as specified in 40 CFR
86.113-04(a)(1):
    (a) [Reserved]
    (b) Manufacturers may demonstrate that vehicles comply with Tier 3
emission standards as specified in 40 CFR part 86, subpart S, during
fuel economy or greenhouse gas measurements using the E0 gasoline test
fuel specified in 40 CFR 86.113-04(a)(1), as long as this test fuel is
used in fuel economy or greenhouse gas testing for all applicable duty
cycles specified in 40 CFR part 86, subpart S. If a vehicle fails to
meet a Tier 3 emission standard using the E0 gasoline test fuel
specified in 40 CFR 86.113-04(a)(1), the manufacturer must retest the
vehicle using the Tier 3 test fuel specified in 40 CFR 1065.710(b) (or
the equivalent LEV III test fuel for California) to demonstrate
compliance with all applicable emission standards over that test cycle.
    (c) If a manufacturer demonstrates compliance with emission
standards for criteria pollutants over all five test cycles using the
Tier 3 test fuel specified in 40 CFR 1065.710(b) (or the equivalent LEV
III test fuel for California), the manufacturer may use test data with
the same test fuel to determine whether a test group meets the criteria
described in Sec.  600.115 for derived 5-cycle testing for fuel economy
labeling. Such vehicles may be tested over the FTP and HFET cycles with
the E0 gasoline test fuel specified in 40 CFR 86.113-04(a)(1) under
this paragraph (c); the vehicles must meet the Tier 3 emission
standards over those test cycles as described in paragraph (b) of this
section. This paragraph (c) applies only for LDV, LDT, and MDPV.
    (d) Manufacturers may perform testing with the appropriate gasoline
test fuels specified in 40 CFR 86.113-04(a)(1), 40 CFR 86.213(a)(2),
and in 40 CFR 1065.710(b) to evaluate whether their vehicles meet the
criteria for derived 5-cycle testing under 40 CFR 600.115. All five
tests must use test fuel with the same nominal ethanol concentration.
This paragraph (d) applies only for LDV, LDT, and MDPV.
    (e) For IUVP testing under Sec.  86.1845, manufacturers may
demonstrate compliance with greenhouse gas emission standards using a
test fuel meeting specifications for demonstrating compliance with
emission standards for criteria pollutants.
0
9. Amend Sec.  600.206-12 by revising paragraphs (a)(1), (2)(ii) and
(iii) to read as follows:

Sec.  600.206-12  Calculation and use of FTP-based and HFET-based fuel
economy, CO2 emissions, and carbon-related exhaust emission values for
vehicle configurations.

    (a) * * *
    (1) If only one set of FTP-based city and HFET-based highway fuel
economy values is accepted for a subconfiguration at which a vehicle
configuration was tested, these values, rounded to the nearest tenth of
a mile per gallon, comprise the city and highway fuel economy values
for that subconfiguration. If only one set of FTP-based city and HFET-
based highway CO2 emissions and carbon-related exhaust
emission values is accepted for a subconfiguration at which a vehicle
configuration was tested, these values, rounded to the nearest gram per
mile, comprise the city and highway CO2 emissions and
carbon-related exhaust emission values for that subconfiguration. When
calculating CO2 values for fuel economy labels generated
from E10 test data, the FTP-based city and HFET-based highway
CO2 emissions for a test vehicle (and for the
subconfiguration), shall be the ``A166 CO2'' emission values
for that test vehicle, where ``A166 CO2'' emissions are
equal to the measured tailpipe CO2 emissions for the test
cycle multiplied by a factor of 1.0166 and rounded to the nearest 0.1
grams/mile.
    (2) If more than one set of FTP-based city and HFET-based highway
fuel economy and/or carbon-related exhaust emission values are accepted
for a vehicle configuration:
    (i) All data shall be grouped according to the subconfiguration for
which the data were generated using sales projections supplied in
accordance with Sec.  600.208-12(a)(3).
    (ii) Within each group of data, all fuel economy values are
harmonically averaged and rounded to the nearest 0.0001 of a mile per
gallon and all CO2 emissions and carbon-related exhaust
emission values are arithmetically averaged and rounded to the nearest
tenth of a gram per mile in order to determine FTP-based city and HFET-
based highway fuel economy, CO2 emissions, and carbon-
related exhaust emission values for each subconfiguration at which the
vehicle configuration was tested. When calculating CO2
values for fuel economy labels generated from E10 test data, the FTP-
based city and HFET-based highway CO2 emissions for a test
vehicle shall be the ``A166 CO2'' emission values for that
test vehicle, where ``A166 CO2'' emissions are equal to the
measured tailpipe CO2 emissions for the test cycle
multiplied by a factor of 1.0166 and rounded to the nearest 0.1 grams/
mile.
    (iii) All FTP-based city fuel economy, CO2 emissions,
and carbon-related exhaust emission values and all HFET-based highway
fuel economy and carbon-related exhaust emission values calculated in
paragraph (a)(2)(ii) of this section are (separately for city and
highway) averaged in proportion to the sales fraction (rounded to the
nearest 0.0001) within the vehicle configuration (as provided to the
Administrator by the manufacturer) of vehicles of each tested
subconfiguration. Fuel economy values shall be harmonically averaged,
and CO2 emissions and carbon-related exhaust

emission values shall be arithmetically averaged. The resultant fuel
economy values, rounded to the nearest 0.0001 mile per gallon, are the
FTP-based city and HFET-based highway fuel economy values for the
vehicle configuration. The resultant CO2 emissions and
carbon-related exhaust emission values, rounded to the nearest tenth of
a gram per mile, are the FTP-based city and HFET-based highway
CO2 emissions and carbon-related exhaust emission values for
the vehicle configuration. Note that for fuel economy labels generated
from E10 test data, the vehicle subconfiguration CO2 values
calculated in paragraph (a)(1) or (a)(2)(ii) of this section as
applicable (which are used to calculate the configuration
CO2 values in this paragraph (a)(2)(iii)) are required to be
``A166 CO2'' values, where ``A166 CO2'' emissions
are equal to the measured tailpipe CO2 emissions for the
test cycle multiplied by a factor of 1.0166 and rounded to the nearest
0.1 grams/mile.
0
10. Amend Sec.  600.207-12 by revising the section heading and
paragraphs (a)(1) and (2)(ii) to read as follows:

Sec.  600.207-12  Calculation and use of vehicle-specific 5-cycle-based
fuel economy and CO2 emission values for vehicle configurations.

    (a) * * *
    (1) If only one set of 5-cycle city and highway fuel economy and
CO2 emission values is accepted for a vehicle configuration,
these values, where fuel economy is rounded to the nearest 0.0001 of a
mile per gallon and the CO2 emission value in grams per mile
is rounded to the nearest tenth of a gram per mile, comprise the city
and highway fuel economy and CO2 emission values for that
configuration. Note that for fuel economy labels generated from E10
test data, the vehicle specific 5-cycle based CO2 values
calculated in paragraph Sec.  600.114-12 are based on ``A166
CO2'' values, where ``A166 CO2'' emissions are
equal to the measured tailpipe CO2 emissions for the test
cycle multiplied by a factor of 1.0166 and rounded to the nearest 0.1
grams/mile.
    (2) * * *
    (ii) Within each subconfiguration of data, all fuel economy values
are harmonically averaged and rounded to the nearest 0.0001 of a mile
per gallon in order to determine 5-cycle city and highway fuel economy
values for each subconfiguration at which the vehicle configuration was
tested, and all CO2 emissions values are arithmetically
averaged and rounded to the nearest tenth of gram per mile to determine
5-cycle city and highway CO2 emission values for each
subconfiguration at which the vehicle configuration was tested. Note
that for fuel economy labels generated from E10 test data, the vehicle
specific 5-cycle based CO2 values calculated in Sec.
600.114-12 are based on ``A166 CO2'' values, where ``A166
CO2'' emissions are equal to the measured tailpipe
CO2 emissions for the test cycle multiplied by a factor of
1.0166 and rounded to the nearest 0.1 grams/mile.
* * * * *
0
11. Amend Sec.  600.208-12 by revising paragraphs (a)(4)(i) and (4)(ii)
and adding a new paragraph (b)(3)(iii)(C) to read as follows:

Sec.  600.208-12  Calculation of FTP-based and HFET-based fuel economy,
CO2 emissions, and carbon-related exhaust emissions for a model type.

    (a) * * *
    (4) Vehicle configuration fuel economy, CO2 emissions,
and carbon-related exhaust emissions, as determined in Sec.  600.206-
12(a), (b) or (c), as applicable, are grouped according to base level.
    (i) If only one vehicle configuration within a base level has been
tested, the fuel economy, CO2 emissions, and carbon-related
exhaust emissions from that vehicle configuration will constitute the
fuel economy, CO2 emissions, and carbon-related exhaust
emissions for that base level. Note that for fuel economy labels
generated from E10 test data, the vehicle configuration CO2
values calculated in Sec.  600.206-12(a)(2)(iii) (which are used to
calculate the base level CO2 values in this paragraph
(a)(4)(i)) are required to be ``A166 CO2'' values, where
``A166 CO2'' emissions are equal to the measured tailpipe
CO2 emissions for the test cycle multiplied by a factor of
1.0166 and rounded to the nearest 0.1 grams/mile.
    (ii) If more than one vehicle configuration within a base level has
been tested, the vehicle configuration fuel economy values are
harmonically averaged in proportion to the respective sales fraction
(rounded to the nearest 0.0001) of each vehicle configuration and the
resultant fuel economy value rounded to the nearest 0.0001 mile per
gallon; and the vehicle configuration CO2 emissions and
carbon-related exhaust emissions are arithmetically averaged in
proportion to the respective sales fraction (rounded to the nearest
0.0001) of each vehicle configuration and the resultant carbon-related
exhaust emission value rounded to the nearest tenth of a gram per mile.
Note that for fuel economy labels generated from E10 test data, the
vehicle configuration CO2 values calculated in Sec.
600.206-12(a)(2)(iii) (which are used to calculate the base level
CO2 values in this paragraph (a)(4)(i)) are required to be
``A166 CO2'' values, where ``A166 CO2'' emissions
are equal to the measured tailpipe CO2 emissions for the
test cycle multiplied by a factor of 1.0166 and rounded to the nearest
0.1 grams/mile.
* * * * *
    (b) * * *
    (3) * * *
    (iii) * * *
    (C) Note that for fuel economy labels generated from E10 test data,
the base level CO2 values determined in paragraphs (a)(4)(i)
and (4)(ii) of this section, as applicable, (which are used to
calculate the model type FTP-based city CO2 values in this
paragraph (b)(3)(iii)) are required to be ``A166 CO2''
values, where ``A166 CO2'' emissions are equal to the
measured tailpipe CO2 emissions for the test cycle
multiplied by a factor of 1.0166 and rounded to the nearest 0.1 grams/
mile.
0
12. Amend Sec.  600.209-12 by revising paragraphs (a) and (b) to read
as follows:

Sec.  600.209-12  Calculation of vehicle-specific 5-cycle fuel economy
and CO2 emission values for a model type.

    (a) Base level. 5-cycle fuel economy and CO2 emission
values for a base level are calculated from vehicle configuration 5-
cycle fuel economy and CO2 emission values as determined in
Sec.  600.207 for low-altitude tests. Note that for fuel economy labels
generated from E10 test data, the vehicle specific 5-cycle based
CO2 values calculated in Sec.  600.114-12 are based on
``A166 CO2'' values, where ``A166 CO2'' emissions
are equal to the measured tailpipe CO2 emissions for the
test cycle multiplied by a factor of 1.0166 and rounded to the nearest
0.1 grams/mile.
* * * * *
    (b) Model type. For each model type, as determined by the
Administrator, city and highway fuel economy and CO2
emissions values will be calculated by using the projected sales and
fuel economy and CO2 emission values for each base level
within the model type. Separate model type calculations will be done
based on the vehicle configuration fuel economy and CO2
emission values as determined in Sec.  600.207, as applicable. Note
that for fuel economy labels generated from E10 test data, the vehicle
specific 5-cycle based CO2 values calculated in Sec.
600.114-12 are based on ``A166 CO2'' values, where ``A166
CO2'' emissions are equal to the measured tailpipe
CO2 emissions for the test cycle multiplied by a factor of
1.0166 and rounded to the nearest 0.1 grams/mile.
* * * * *

0
13. Amend Sec.  600.210-12 by revising paragraphs (a)(2)(i)(B),
((ii)(B), (b)(2)(i)(B), and (ii)(B) to read as follows:

Sec.  600.210-12  Calculation of fuel economy and CO2 emission values
for labeling.

    (a) * * *
    (2) * * *
    (i) * * * (B) For each model type, determine the derived five-cycle
city CO2 emissions using the following equation and
coefficients determined by the Administrator:

Derived 5-cycle City CO2 = ({City Intercept{time}  x A) +
({City Slope{time}  x MT FTP CO2)

Where:

A = 8,887 for gasoline-fueled vehicles, 10,180 for diesel-fueled
vehicles, or an appropriate value specified by the Administrator for
other fuels.
City Intercept = Intercept determined by the Administrator based on
historic vehicle-specific 5-cycle city fuel economy data.
City Slope = Slope determined by the Administrator based on historic
vehicle-specific 5-cycle city fuel economy data.
MT FTP CO2 = the model type FTP-based city CO2
emissions determined under Sec.  600.208-12(b), rounded to the
nearest 0.1 grams per mile. Note that for fuel economy labels
generated from E10 test data, the MT FTP CO2 input value
is required to be ``A166 CO2'' values for the model type,
where ``A166 CO2'' emissions are equal to the measured
tailpipe CO2 emissions for the test cycle multiplied by a
factor of 1.0166, rounded to the nearest 0.1 grams per mile, as
obtained in Sec.  600.208-12(b)(3)(iii).

* * * * *
    (ii) * * *
    (B) For each model type, determine the derived five-cycle highway
CO2 emissions using the equation below and coefficients
determined by the Administrator:

Derived 5-cycle Highway CO2 = ({Highway Intercept{time}  x
A) + ({Highway Slope{time}  x MT HFET CO2)

Where:

A = 8,887 for gasoline-fueled vehicles, 10,180 for diesel-fueled
vehicles, or an appropriate value specified by the Administrator for
other fuels.
Highway Intercept = Intercept determined by the Administrator based
on historic vehicle-specific 5-cycle highway fuel economy data.
Highway Slope = Slope determined by the Administrator based on
historic vehicle-specific 5-cycle highway fuel economy data.
MT HFET CO2 = the model type highway CO2
emissions determined under Sec.  600.208-12(b), rounded to the
nearest 0.1 grams per mile. Note that for fuel economy labels
generated from E10 test data, the MT HFET CO2 input value
is required to be ``A166 CO2'' values for the model type,
where ``A166 CO2'' emissions are equal to the measured
tailpipe CO2 emissions for the test cycle multiplied by a
factor of 1.0166, rounded to the nearest 0.1 grams per mile, as
obtained in Sec.  600.208-12(b)(3)(iii) and Sec.  600.208-12(b)(4).

* * * * *
    (b) * * *
    (2) * * *
    (i) * * * (B) Determine the derived five-cycle city CO2
emissions of the configuration using the equation below and
coefficients determined by the Administrator:

    Derived 5-cycle City CO2 = {City Intercept{time}  +
{City Slope{time}  x Config FTP CO2

Where:

City Intercept = Intercept determined by the Administrator based on
historic vehicle-specific 5-cycle city fuel economy data.
City Slope = Slope determined by the Administrator based on historic
vehicle-specific 5-cycle city fuel economy data.
Config FTP CO2 = the configuration FTP-based city
CO2 emissions determined under Sec.  600.206, rounded to
the nearest 0.1 grams per mile. Note that for specific labels
generated from E10 test data, the Config FTP CO2 input
value is required to be ``A166 CO2'' values for the
configuration, where ``A166 CO2'' emissions are equal to
the measured tailpipe CO2 emissions for the test cycle
multiplied by a factor of 1.0166, rounded to the nearest 0.1 grams
per mile, as obtained in Sec.  600.206-12(a)(2)(iii).

* * * * *
    (ii) * * * (B) Determine the derived five-cycle highway
CO2 emissions of the configuration using the equation below
and coefficients determined by the Administrator:

Derived 5-cycle city Highway CO2 = {Highway Intercept{time}
+ {Highway Slope{time}  x Config HFET CO2

Where:

Highway Intercept = Intercept determined by the Administrator based
on historic vehicle-specific 5-cycle highway fuel economy data.
Highway Slope = Slope determined by the Administrator based on
historic vehicle-specific 5-cycle highway fuel economy data.
Config HFET CO2 = the configuration highway fuel economy
determined under Sec.  600.206, rounded to the nearest tenth. Note
that for specific labels generated from E10 test data, the Config
HFET CO2 input value is required to be ``A166
CO2'' values for the configuration, where ``A166
CO2'' emissions are equal to the measured tailpipe
CO2 emissions for the test cycle multiplied by a factor
of 1.0166, rounded to the nearest 0.1 grams per mile, as obtained in
Sec.  600.206-12(a)(2)(iii).

* * * * *
[FR Doc. 2020-07202 Filed 5-12-20; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6560-50-P


[Federal Register: August 21, 2009 (Volume 74, Number 161)]
[Notices]
[Page 42298-42301]
[DOCID:fr21au09-49]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY

[FRL-8947-9; EPA-HQ-OEI-2008-0791]

Type of Action: Amendment

AGENCY: Environmental Protection Agency (EPA).

ACTION: Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: Pursuant to the provisions of the Privacy Act of 1974 (5
U.S.C. 552a), EPA's Office of Pollution Prevention and Toxics (OPPT) is
providing notice of its proposal to amend an existing system of records
(SOR) by changing the title of ``Lead-Based Paint System of Records''
(LPSOR) to the ``Federal Lead-based Paint Program System of Records''
(FLPPSOR). FLPPSOR stores information in both electronic and hard-copy
formats and contains information about individuals who: have applied
for certification to conduct lead-based paint and renovation
activities; are students taking classes in lead-based paint and
renovation activities; or have been identified to provide training in
lead-based paint and renovation activities. On April 22, 2008, EPA
published the Renovation, Repair, and Painting Program rule in the
Federal Register with an effective date of June 23, 2008. The
Renovation, Repair, and Painting rule establishes requirements for
training renovators and dust-sampling technicians; certifying
renovators, dust-sampling technicians and renovation firms; accrediting
providers of renovator

and dust-sampling technician training; and renovation work practices.
FLPPSOR will contain information about individuals who are certified
inspectors, supervisors, risk assessors, project designers, abatement
workers, renovators and dust-sampling technicians. EPA administers the
certification and accreditation programs in States, Tribal areas, and
territories that do not have EPA's authorization to independently
administer such programs. EPA is no longer requiring individuals to
provide their social security numbers on application forms for
certification.

DATES: Persons wishing to comment on this system of records notice
amendment must do so by September 30, 2009.

ADDRESSES: Submit your comments, identified by Docket ID No. EPA-HQ-
2008-0791, by one of the following methods:
     http://www.regulations.gov.: Follow the online
instructions for submitting comments.
     E-mail<EMAIL_ADDRESS>    Fax:<PHONE_NUMBER>.
     Mail: OEI Docket, Environmental Protection Agency, Mail
code: 2822T, 1200 Pennsylvania Ave., NW., Washington, DC 20460.
     Hand Delivery: OEI Docket, EPA/DC, EPA West Building, Room
3334, 1301 Constitution Ave., NW., Washington, DC. Such deliveries are
only accepted during the docket's normal hours of operation, and
special arrangements should be made for deliveries of boxed
information.
    Instructions: Direct your comments to Docket ID No. EPA-HQ-2008-
0791. EPA's policy is that all comments received will be included in
the public docket without change and may be made available online at
http://www.regulations.gov, including any personal information
provided, unless the comment includes information claimed to be
Confidential Business Information (CBI) or other information for which
disclosure is restricted by statute. Do not submit information that you
consider to be CBI or otherwise protected through http://
www.regulations.gov. The http://www.regulations.gov Web site is an
``anonymous access'' system, which means EPA will not know your
identity or contact information unless you provide it in the body of
your comment. If you send an e-mail comment directly to EPA without
going through http://www.regulations.gov your e-mail address will be
automatically captured and included as part of the comment that is
placed in the public docket and made available on the Internet. If you
submit an electronic comment, EPA recommends that you include your name
and other contact information in the body of your comment and with any
disk or CD-ROM you submit. If EPA cannot read your comment due to
technical difficulties and cannot contact you for clarification, EPA
may not be able to consider your comment. Electronic files should avoid
the use of special characters, any form of encryption, and be free of
any defects or viruses. For additional information about EPA's public
docket visit the EPA Docket Center home page at http://www.epa.gov/
epahome/dockets.htm.
    Docket: All documents in the docket are listed in the http://
www.regulations.gov index. Although listed in the index, some
information is not publicly available (e.g., CBI or other information
for which disclosure is restricted by statute). Certain other material,
such as copyrighted material, will be publicly available only in hard
copy. Publicly available docket materials are available either
electronically in http://www.regulations.gov or in hard copy at the OEI
Docket, EPA/DC, EPA West Building, Room 3334, 1301 Constitution Ave.,
NW., Washington, DC 20004. The Public Reading Room is open from 8:30
a.m. to 4:30 p.m., Monday through Friday excluding legal holidays. The
telephone number for the Public Reading Room is<PHONE_NUMBER>, and the
telephone number for the OEI Docket is<PHONE_NUMBER>.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Robert Wright, National Program
Chemicals Division (7404T), Office of Pollution Prevention and Toxics,
Environmental Protection Agency, 1200 Pennsylvania Ave., NW.,
Washington, DC 20460-0001; telephone number:<PHONE_NUMBER>; e-mail
address<EMAIL_ADDRESS>
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

I. General Information

    FLPPSOR contains information about individuals who: have applied
for certification to perform lead-based paint and renovation
activities; take classes on how to perform lead-based paint and
renovation activities; and/or are identified on behalf of firms to
provide training in lead-based paint and renovation activities. In
addition, FLPPSOR will contain information about individuals who: are
certified renovators or dust sampling technicians; are taking renovator
or dust-sampling technician training classes; or have been identified
by those firms that are accredited by EPA to provide training for
renovation or dust-sampling technician courses. The EPA Federal Lead-
Based Paint Program system of records does not duplicate any existing
system of records. The system handles Privacy Act protected information
in the same manner regardless of whether the information is contained
in electronic or hard-copy form. Access to the system is restricted to
authorized users and will be maintained in a secure, password-protected
computer system, in secure areas and buildings with physical access
controls and environmental controls. The system is maintained by EPA's
Office of Pollution Prevention and Toxics.

    Dated: July 25, 2009.
Linda A. Travers,
Acting Assistant Administrator and Chief Information Officer.
EPA-54

System Name:
    Federal Lead-Based Paint Program System of Records (FLPPSOR).

System Location:
    Records maintained in FLPPSOR are stored in electronic and hard-
copy formats at Research Triangle Park (RTP), NC, EPA regional offices
and the Federal program contractor's office. In addition:
    (1) The main system is located at EPA's National Computer Center
(NCC) in Research Triangle Park (RTP), North Carolina. This database
contains information entered from some of the primary sources listed
below under ``Categories of Records in the System'' (submitted form and
notifications).
    (2) Hard-copy files are located in EPA regional offices and the
facility operated by EPA's Federal program contractor's office. These
records include the original or photocopied paper submissions
(including supplementary information) provided to the Agency. Though
similar in file content, the hard-copy collections maintained by the
EPA contractor may differ from those maintained by the applicable
regional office.
    (3) EPA regional offices have developed electronic systems for
their local uses. These electronic records are maintained separate from
the main central server at RTP and are used solely by the regional
offices.

Categories of Individuals Covered by the System:
    Individuals covered by the system include those who have applied
for certification to perform lead-based paint and renovation activities
in the following disciplines: inspectors,

supervisors, risk assessors, project designers, abatement workers,
renovators, and dust-sampling technicians. Certified inspectors,
supervisors, risk assessors, project designers, and abatement workers
may be listed on EPA's Lead home page in the future. All renovators and
dust-sampling technicians will be listed on EPA's Lead home page.

Categories of Records in the System:
    FLPPSOR contains individuals' names, home addresses, telephone
numbers, dates of birth, work-related information, signatures, course
test scores, submitted fees, and certificate numbers.

Authority for Maintenance of the System:
    40 CFR Part 745 Lead--Requirements for Lead-Based Paint Activities
in Target Housing and Child-Occupied Facilities and 40 CFR Part 745
Lead--Renovation, Repair, and Painting Program.

Purpose(s):
    The purpose of FLPPSOR is to maintain information submitted to the
Agency through various documents under the Federal Lead-Based Paint
Program and the Federal Lead-Based Paint Renovation, Repair and
Painting Program. These records include application forms, notification
forms, and various support documents. FLPPSOR supports activities
integral to the program (i.e., issuing certificates and badges,
analyzing information, generating letters and reports, and providing
information to allow for executing various enforcement actions).

Routine Uses of Records Maintained in the System and Their Purpose;
Categories of Users:
    General routine uses are as follows: A, B, C, E, F, G, H, I, K, and
L. (A detailed description of these routine uses can be found in the
Agency's System of Records Web site at http://www.epa.gov/privacy/
notice/general.htm). In addition, the following routine uses may also
apply:

Program Disclosure/User Categories:
    Consistent with applicable provisions of the Privacy Act and the
Freedom of Information Act (FOIA), the Agency may disclose information
from FLPPSOR to Federal, State, or local agencies, present and former
employers and business and personal associates, and hearing officials,
as a given situation might require, for purposes including the
following:
    (1) To verify the identity of the individual;
    (2) To enforce the conditions or terms of the Agency's Lead-Based
Paint Program and Lead-Based Paint Renovation, Repair and Painting
Program regulations;
    (3) To investigate possible fraud by, for example, applicants and
users, and verify compliance with Agency Lead-Based Paint Program and
Lead-Based Paint Renovation, Repair and Painting Program regulations;
    (4) To prepare for litigation or to litigate fee collections and
reporting enforcement matters;
    (5) To initiate a limitation, suspension, and termination (LS&T) or
debarment action;
    (6) To investigate complaints, update files, and correct errors;
    (7) To prepare for alternative dispute resolutions (ADR) in any of
the cases described in paragraphs (2), (3), and (4);
    (8) To engage in audits or other internal matters within EPA;
    (9) To contact certified individuals and applicants in the event of
a system modification; or
    (10) To respond to a change to FLPPSOR, as in the case of a
modification, revocation, or termination of a user's access privileges.

Policies and Practices for Storing, Retrieving, Safeguarding Access,
Retaining, and Disposing of Records in the System:
    FLPPSOR maintains records on individuals derived from a variety of
sources relating to the undertaking of lead-based paint activities;
lead-based paint renovation, repair and painting activities; and
training. These record sources include the following forms submitted to
EPA: EPA Form 8500-27, ``Application and Instructions for Firms
Applying for Certification of Lead-Based Paint and Renovation
Activities;'' EPA Form 8500-25, ``Application and Instructions for
Training Providers Applying for Accreditation of Lead-Based Paint
Activity and Renovation Training Programs,'' and EPA Form 8500-28,
``Application and Instructions for Individuals Applying for
Certification to Conduct Lead-Based Paint Activities.'' The information
derived from these forms concerns individuals, firms and training
providers who have applied for certification or accreditation in lead-
based paint or renovation activities. Two record sources include
information derived from required notifications submitted to EPA
pursuant to 40 CFR Part 745. The first of these latter record sources
requires firms certified under 40 CFR 745.226 to provide notification
to the Agency prior to conducting lead-based paint abatement
activities. The second of these record sources requires training
programs accredited under 40 CFR 745.225 to provide notification to the
Agency prior to and then following conducting lead-based paint
abatement and renovation, repair and painting activities training
courses. The data derived from these notifications include information
on individuals who supervise lead-based paint abatement and prepare the
notification to EPA prior to doing so or serve as instructors for
managing other instructors or attending training as students of these
accredited programs. Finally, other record sources of information
stored in the system may include supplementary documents obtained by
regional offices in the application approval process.
     Storage: Records maintained under the FLPPSOR are stored
in different formats and in several locations. Each of these record
collections, which together comprise the FLPPSOR, must adhere to the
requirements of the Privacy Act and are subject to the rules and
restrictions for disclosure of information specified under the Freedom
of Information Act.
     Retrievability: Records may be retrieved by an
individual's name, application ID number, applicant ID number, or
program activity.
     Safeguards: Physical access to the system housed in the
facility at RTP is controlled by a computerized badge-reading system,
with security patrols during non-business hours. All interactions
between the system and the authorized individual users are recorded
through use of a card reader and tracking database. Paper records
stored at EPA's Federal program contractor are protected by
computerized badge-reading security systems, with files maintained in
locked file drawers. Records stored at EPA regional offices are secured
through building security protocols and computerized badge-reading
systems.
     Retention and Disposal: EPA will retain and dispose of
these records in accordance with the EPA Records Schedule 089 and the
National Archives and Records Administration General Records Schedule
23/8. Application records maintained in the system are deleted/
destroyed two years after the date of the last entry.

System Manager's Address and Telephone Number:
    Maria J. Doa, Ph.D., Director, National Program Chemicals Division,
USEPA, Office of Pollution Prevention and Toxics, (7404T), 1200
Pennsylvania Ave., NW., Washington, DC 20460,<PHONE_NUMBER>.

Notification Procedure:
    Requests to determine whether this system of records contains a
record pertaining to you must be sent to the

Agency's Freedom of Information Office. The address is: U.S.
Environmental Protection Agency; 1200 Pennsylvania Ave., NW., Room 6416
West; Washington, DC 20460;<PHONE_NUMBER>; E-mail: (hq.foia@epa.gov);
Attn: Privacy Act Officer.

Record Access Procedures:
    Requesters seeking access to this system will be required to
provide adequate identification (e.g., driver's license, military
identification card, employee badge or identification card) and, if
necessary, proof of authority. Additional identity verification
procedures may be required as warranted. Requests must meet the
requirements of EPA regulations at 40 CFR Part 16.

Contesting Records Procedures:
    If you wish to contest a record in the system of records, contact
the Agency's Freedom of Information Office as described under
``Notification Procedure'' listed above.

Record Source Categories:
    Information is obtained from individuals, firms, and training
providers who are certified and/or accredited to perform lead-based
paint and renovation activities.

System Exempted from Certain Provisions of the Act:
    None.

 [FR Doc. E9-20209 Filed 8-20-09; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 6560-50-P


[Federal Register Volume 87, Number 236 (Friday, December 9, 2022)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Pages 75468-75470]
[FR Doc No: 2022-26721]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION

Federal Aviation Administration

14 CFR Part 97

[Docket No. 31459; Amdt. No. 4036]

Standard Instrument Approach Procedures, and Takeoff Minimums and
Obstacle Departure Procedures; Miscellaneous Amendments

AGENCY: Federal Aviation Administration (FAA), DOT.

ACTION: Final rule.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: This rule amends, suspends, or removes Standard Instrument
Approach Procedures (SIAPs) and associated Takeoff Minimums and
Obstacle Departure Procedures for operations at certain airports. These
regulatory actions are needed because of the adoption of new or revised
criteria, or because of changes occurring in the National Airspace
System, such as the commissioning of new navigational facilities,
adding new obstacles, or changing air traffic requirements. These
changes are designed to provide for the safe and efficient use of the
navigable airspace and to promote safe flight operations under
instrument flight rules at the affected airports.

DATES: This rule is effective December 9, 2022. The compliance date for
each SIAP, associated Takeoff Minimums, and ODP is specified in the
amendatory provisions.
    The incorporation by reference of certain publications listed in
the regulations is approved by the Director of the Federal Register as
of December 9, 2022.

ADDRESSES: Availability of matter incorporated by reference in the
amendment is as follows:

For Examination

    1. U.S. Department of Transportation, Docket Ops-M30, 1200 New
Jersey Avenue SE, West Bldg., Ground Floor, Washington, DC 20590-0001;
    2. The FAA Air Traffic Organization Service Area in which the
affected airport is located;
    3. The office of Aeronautical Information Services, 6500 South
MacArthur Blvd., Oklahoma City, OK 73169 or,
    4. The National Archives and Records Administration (NARA).
    For information on the availability of this material at NARA, email
[email protected] or go to: https://www.archives.gov/federal-register/cfr/ibr-locations.html.

Availability

    All SIAPs and Takeoff Minimums and ODPs are available online free
of charge. Visit the National Flight Data Center online at nfdc.faa.gov
to register. Additionally, individual SIAP and Takeoff Minimums and ODP
copies may be obtained from the FAA Air Traffic Organization Service
Area in which the affected airport is located.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Thomas J. Nichols, Flight Procedures
and Airspace Group, Flight Technologies and Procedures Division, Flight
Standards Service, Federal Aviation Administration. Mailing Address:
FAA Mike Monroney Aeronautical Center, Flight Procedures and Airspace
Group, 6500 South MacArthur Blvd., Registry Bldg. 29, Room 104,
Oklahoma City, OK 73169. Telephone:<PHONE_NUMBER>.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: This rule amends 14 CFR part 97 by amending
the referenced SIAPs. The complete regulatory description of each SIAP
is listed on the appropriate FAA Form 8260, as modified by the National
Flight Data Center (NFDC)/Permanent Notice to Airmen (P-NOTAM), and is
incorporated by reference under 5 U.S.C. 552(a), 1 CFR part 51, and 14
CFR 97.20. The large number of SIAPs, their complex nature, and the
need for a special format make their verbatim publication in the
Federal Register expensive and impractical. Further, airmen do not use
the regulatory text of the SIAPs, but refer to their graphic depiction
on charts printed by publishers of aeronautical materials. Thus, the
advantages of incorporation by reference are realized and publication
of the complete description of each SIAP contained on FAA form
documents is unnecessary. This amendment provides the affected CFR
sections, and specifies the SIAPs and Takeoff Minimums and ODPs with
their applicable effective dates. This amendment also identifies the
airport and its location, the procedure and the amendment number.

Availability and Summary of Material Incorporated by Reference

    The material incorporated by reference is publicly available as
listed in the ADDRESSES section. The material incorporated by reference
describes SIAPs, Takeoff Minimums and ODPs as identified in the
amendatory language for Part 97 of this final rule.

The Rule

    This amendment to 14 CFR part 97 is effective upon publication of
each separate SIAP and Takeoff Minimums

and ODP as amended in the transmittal. For safety and timeliness of
change considerations, this amendment incorporates only specific
changes contained for each SIAP and Takeoff Minimums and ODP as
modified by FDC permanent NOTAMs.
    The SIAPs and Takeoff Minimums and ODPs, as modified by FDC
permanent NOTAM, and contained in this amendment are based on criteria
contained in the U.S. Standard for Terminal Instrument Procedures
(TERPS). In developing these changes to SIAPs and Takeoff Minimums and
ODPs, the TERPS criteria were applied only to specific conditions
existing at the affected airports. All SIAP amendments in this rule
have been previously issued by the FAA in a FDC NOTAM as an emergency
action of immediate flight safety relating directly to published
aeronautical charts.
    The circumstances that created the need for these SIAP and Takeoff
Minimums and ODP amendments require making them effective in less than
30 days.
    Because of the close and immediate relationship between these
SIAPs, Takeoff Minimums and ODPs, and safety in air commerce, I find
that notice and public procedure under 5 U.S.C. 553(b) are
impracticable and contrary to the public interest and, where
applicable, under 5 U.S.C. 553(d), good cause exists for making these
SIAPs effective in less than 30 days.
    The FAA has determined that this regulation only involves an
established body of technical regulations for which frequent and
routine amendments are necessary to keep them operationally current.
It, therefore--(1) is not a ``significant regulatory action'' under
Executive Order 12866; (2) is not a ``significant rule'' under DOT
regulatory Policies and Procedures (44 FR 11034; February 26, 1979);
and (3) does not warrant preparation of a regulatory evaluation as the
anticipated impact is so minimal. For the same reason, the FAA
certifies that this amendment will not have a significant economic
impact on a substantial number of small entities under the criteria of
the Regulatory Flexibility Act.

List of Subjects in 14 CFR Part 97

    Air Traffic Control, Airports, Incorporation by reference,
Navigation (Air).

    Issued in Washington, DC, on November 11, 2022.
Thomas J Nichols,
Aviation Safety, Flight Standards Service, Manager, Standards Section,
Flight Procedures & Airspace Group, Flight Technologies & Procedures
Division.

Adoption of the Amendment

    Accordingly, pursuant to the authority delegated to me, Title 14,
CFR part 97, is amended by amending Standard Instrument Approach
Procedures and Takeoff Minimums and ODPs, effective at 0901 UTC on the
dates specified, as follows:

PART 97--STANDARD INSTRUMENT APPROACH PROCEDURES

0
1. The authority citation for part 97 continues to read as follows:

    Authority:  49 U.S.C. 106(f), 106(g), 40103, 40106, 40113,
40114, 40120, 44502, 44514, 44701, 44719, 44721-44722.

0
2. Part 97 is amended to read as follows:
    By amending: Sec.  97.23 VOR, VOR/DME, VOR or TACAN, and VOR/DME or
TACAN; Sec.  97.25 LOC, LOC/DME, LDA, LDA/DME, SDF, SDF/DME; Sec.
97.27 NDB, NDB/DME; Sec.  97.29 ILS, ILS/DME, MLS, MLS/DME, MLS/RNAV;
Sec.  97.31 RADAR SLAPs, Sec.  97.33 RNAV SLAPs; and Sec.  97.35 COPTER
SLAPs, Identified as follows:

* * * Effective Upon Publication

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
      AIRAC Date           State              City                 Airport          FDC No.      FDC date                      Subject
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
29-Dec-22............  DE             Georgetown..........  Delaware Coastal....       2/0337     10/24/22  VOR RWY 22, Amdt 7B.
29-Dec-22............  DE             Georgetown..........  Delaware Coastal....       2/0339     10/24/22  RNAV (GPS) RWY 4, Amdt 3.
29-Dec-22............  KS             Pittsburg...........  Atkinson Muni.......       2/1086     10/12/22  RNAV (GPS) RWY 22, Amdt 1C.
29-Dec-22............  CO             Fort Collins/         Northern Colorado          2/1196      11/7/22  VOR-A, Amdt 7B.
                                       Loveland.             Rgnl.
29-Dec-22............  FL             Orlando.............  Orlando Sanford Intl       2/2414     10/17/22  ILS OR LOC RWY 9L, Amdt 4B.
29-Dec-22............  GA             Cartersville........  Cartersville........       2/2710      11/2/22  RNAV (GPS) RWY 1, Amdt 1C.
29-Dec-22............  CA             San Diego/El Cajon..  Gillespie Fld.......       2/2738      11/4/22  RNAV (GPS) RWY 9L, Orig-A.
29-Dec-22............  FL             Immokalee...........  Immokalee Rgnl......       2/2739      11/4/22  RNAV (GPS) RWY 18, Amdt 1A.
29-Dec-22............  FL             Immokalee...........  Immokalee Rgnl......       2/2740      11/4/22  RNAV (GPS) RWY 36, Amdt 1B.
29-Dec-22............  MI             Caro................  Tuscola Area........       2/3222      11/2/22  RNAV (GPS) RWY 6, Amdt 2.
29-Dec-22............  LA             Rayville............  John H Hooks Jr Meml       2/3525     10/20/22  RNAV (GPS) RWY 18, Amdt 1B.
29-Dec-22............  TX             Yoakum..............  Yoakum Muni.........       2/3689      10/3/22  RNAV (GPS) RWY 31, Orig-C.
29-Dec-22............  MS             Bay St Louis........  Stennis Intl........       2/3838     10/14/22  ILS Y OR LOC Y RWY 18, Orig.
29-Dec-22............  MS             Bay St Louis........  Stennis Intl........       2/3839     10/14/22  ILS Z OR LOC Z RWY 18, Amdt 3.
29-Dec-22............  MT             Great Falls.........  Great Falls Intl....       2/4000      11/7/22  ILS OR LOC RWY 3, Amdt 5C.
29-Dec-22............  TX             El Paso.............  El Paso Intl........       2/5651     10/21/22  RNAV (GPS) X RWY 4, Orig-D.
29-Dec-22............  TX             El Paso.............  El Paso Intl........       2/5652     10/21/22  RNAV (GPS) RWY 26R, Amdt 1.
29-Dec-22............  TX             El Paso.............  El Paso Intl........       2/5680     10/21/22  VOR RWY 26L, Amdt 32B.
29-Dec-22............  TX             El Paso.............  El Paso Intl........       2/5683     10/21/22  RADAR 1, Amdt 15C.
29-Dec-22............  TX             El Paso.............  El Paso Intl........       2/5685     10/21/22  LOC/DME RWY 4, Amdt 3B.
29-Dec-22............  AL             Dothan..............  Dothan Rgnl.........       2/5798     10/24/22  ILS OR LOC RWY 14, Amdt 2.
29-Dec-22............  MN             Austin..............  Austin Muni.........       2/6036      10/3/22  ILS OR LOC RWY 35, Amdt 1C.
29-Dec-22............  MN             Detroit Lakes.......  Detroit Lakes/             2/6146     10/20/22  RNAV (GPS) RWY 14, Amdt 2.
                                                             Wething Fld.
29-Dec-22............  TX             Corpus Christi......  Corpus Christi Intl.       2/6245     10/19/22  ILS OR LOC RWY 13, Amdt 28.
29-Dec-22............  VT             Morrisville.........  Morrisville-Stowe          2/6396     10/24/22  RNAV (GPS) Z RWY 19, Amdt 2.
                                                             State.
29-Dec-22............  MN             Olivia..............  Olivia Rgnl.........       2/6414     10/19/22  RNAV (GPS) RWY 29, Orig-B.
29-Dec-22............  TN             Shelbyville.........  Bomar Fld/                 2/6417     10/24/22  VOR RWY 18, Amdt 5C.
                                                             Shelbyville Muni.
29-Dec-22............  MS             Greenwood...........  Greenwood-Leflore...       2/6475      8/15/22  RNAV (GPS) RWY 5, Amdt 2B.
29-Dec-22............  MS             Greenwood...........  Greenwood-Leflore...       2/6476      8/15/22  RNAV (GPS) RWY 18, Amdt 2B.
29-Dec-22............  MS             Greenwood...........  Greenwood-Leflore...       2/6478      8/15/22  RNAV (GPS) RWY 36, Amdt 1A.
29-Dec-22............  MS             Greenwood...........  Greenwood-Leflore...       2/6481      8/15/22  ILS OR LOC RWY 18, Amdt 8B.

29-Dec-22............  MS             Greenwood...........  Greenwood-Leflore...       2/6483      8/15/22  VOR RWY 5, Amdt 13B.
29-Dec-22............  MS             Corinth.............  Roscoe Turner.......       2/7401     10/24/22  RNAV (GPS) RWY 36, Amdt 1C.
29-Dec-22............  MS             Corinth.............  Roscoe Turner.......       2/7406     10/24/22  ILS OR LOC RWY 18, Amdt 4.
29-Dec-22............  MS             Corinth.............  Roscoe Turner.......       2/7420     10/24/22  RNAV (GPS) RWY 18, Amdt 1A.
29-Dec-22............  IN             Logansport..........  Logansport/Cass            2/7662      9/23/22  RNAV (GPS) RWY 9, Amdt 1B.
                                                             County.
29-Dec-22............  OH             Millersburg.........  Holmes County.......       2/8082     10/24/22  RNAV (GPS) RWY 9, Orig-B.
29-Dec-22............  OH             Millersburg.........  Holmes County.......       2/8083     10/24/22  RNAV (GPS) RWY 27, Orig-B.
29-Dec-22............  IA             Vinton..............  Vinton Veterans Meml       2/9284     10/26/22  RNAV (GPS) RWY 9, Orig.
                                                             Airpark.
29-Dec-22............  AL             Troy................  Troy Muni At N             2/9433       9/7/22  RNAV (GPS) RWY 32, Amdt 1C.
                                                             Kenneth Campbell
                                                             Fld.
29-Dec-22............  AL             Troy................  Troy Muni At N             2/9434       9/7/22  ILS OR LOC RWY 7, Amdt 11A.
                                                             Kenneth Campbell
                                                             Fld.
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

[FR Doc. 2022-26721 Filed 12-8-22; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910-13-P


  SEQ CHAPTER \h \r 1 Form for Compliance with E.O. 12866 Docket
Requirements

Title of Regulation:         National Pollutant Discharge Elimination
System (NPDES) Water Transfers - Final Rule

Contact person:    Virginia Garelick, Water Permits Division, Office of
Wastewater Management

Phone number:

202-564-2316

Was this regulation reviewed by OMB under Executive Order 12866 -
Regulatory Planning and Review?

Yes          No

If you checked “no”, you are done with this form.  Simply place it
in the docket for your regulation.  If you checked “yes”, please
fill out the remainder of the form before placing it in the docket.
Also docket any relevant documents referenced in the form.

For regulations that are checked “Yes” above:

This regulation was reviewed by OMB under Executive Order 12866 -
Regulatory Planning and Review.

Attached is the draft regulation and any other documents sent to OMB for
review, such as analyses and assessments.   E.O. 12866 requires agencies
to make these publicly available.

E.O. 12866 also requires agencies to identify the substantive changes
between the draft regulation sent to OMB for review and the regulation
subsequently announced  [Please check the appropriate box below:]

     	EPA made substantive changes to this regulation

(includes changes initiated by EPA or OMB).

Attached is a document which: (1) identifies all the substantive changes
made, and (2) notes those changes OMB suggested or recommended.

 X 	No substantive changes were made to this regulation

EPA made only editorial rather than substantive changes to the rule and
preamble in response to comments from OMB.  EPA is attaching is the
draft regulation and preamble sent to OMB for review as well as the
changes made due to OMB’s comments.

If you have questions about this regulation, please call the EPA contact
person listed above.