[Federal Register Volume 84, Number 88 (Tuesday, May 7, 2019)]
[Notices]
[Page 19989]
[FR Doc No: 2019-09252]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION

Federal Aviation Administration

[Docket No. FAA-2019-0334]

Agency Information Collection Activities: Requests for Comments;
Clearance of New Approval of Information Collection: Safety Statement
Requirement for Manufacturers of Small Unmanned Aircraft Correction

AGENCY: Federal Aviation Administration (FAA), DOT.

ACTION: Notice and request for comments.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: In accordance with the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995, FAA
invites public comments about our intention to request the Office of
Management and Budget (OMB) approval of a new information collection.
The collection involves manufacturers of small unmanned aircraft
providing a safety statement to owners of the UAS they produce. This is
a statutory requirement. To minimize the burden on small businesses,
the FAA has developed an example safety statement that can be used to
satisfy the requirement. This FRN corrects the previously submitted 60-
Day FRN to include updated contact information and docket number.

DATES: Written comments should be submitted by July 8, 2019.

ADDRESSES: Please send written comments:
    By Electronic Docket: www.regulations.gov (Enter docket number FAA-
2019-0334 into search field).
    By mail: Jessica Orquina, 490 L'Enfant Plaza Suite 7225,
Washington, DC 20024.
    By fax:<PHONE_NUMBER>.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Jessica Orquina by email at:
<EMAIL_ADDRESS>phone:<PHONE_NUMBER>.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
    Public Comments Invited: You are asked to comment on any aspect of
this information collection, including (a) Whether the proposed
collection of information is necessary for FAA's performance; (b) the
accuracy of the estimated burden; (c) ways for FAA to enhance the
quality, utility and clarity of the information collection; and (d)
ways that the burden could be minimized without reducing the quality of
the collected information. The agency will summarize and/or include
your comments in the request for OMB's clearance of this information
collection.
    OMB Control Number: 2120-XXXX.
    Title: Safety Statement Requirement for Manufacturers of Small
Unmanned Aircraft Correction.
    Form Numbers: N/A.
    Type of Review: This is a new information collection request.
    Background: Section 2203 of the FAA Extension, Safety, and Security
Act of 2016 (Pub. L. 114-90) requires manufacturers of small unmanned
aircraft to make available to the owner a safety statement that
satisfies requirements detailed in that section. The requirements
include:
    1. Information about, and sources of, laws and regulations
applicable to small unmanned aircraft;
    2. Recommendations for using small unmanned aircraft in a manner
that promotes the safety of person and property;
    3. The date that the safety statement was created or last modified;
and
    4. Language approved by the Administrator regarding the following:
    a. A person may operate the small unmanned aircraft as a model
aircraft (as defined in section 336 of the FAA Modernization and Reform
Act of 2012 (49 U.S.C. 40101 note)) or otherwise in accordance with
Federal Aviation Administration authorization or regulation, including
requirements for the completion of any applicable airman test.
    b. The definition of a model aircraft under section 336 of the FAA
Modernization and Reform Act of 2012 (49 U.S.C. 40101 note).
    c. The requirements regarding the operation of a model aircraft
under section 336 of the FAA Modernization and Reform Act of 2012 (49
U.S.C. 40101 note).
    d. The Administrator may pursue enforcement action against a person
operating model aircraft who endangers the safety of the national
airspace system.
    By statute, manufacturers will be required to make a safety
statement available to small UAS owners. This manufacturer insert
serves as an example safety statement that UAS manufacturers may use.
The FAA provides an example safety statement and guidance to assist
manufacturers to comply with this requirement.
    Respondents: Manufacturers of small UAS sold in the U.S.
(Association for Unmanned Vehicle Systems International (AUVSI) reports
there are 471 active manufacturers in February 2019.)
    Frequency: On occasion.
    Estimated Average Burden per Response: 40 Hours.
    Estimated Total Annual Burden: 18,840.

    Issued in Washington, DC, on April 29, 2019.
Jessica Orquina,
Senior Communications Specialist, Executive Office, AUS-10, UAS
Integration Office.
[FR Doc. 2019-09252 Filed 5-6-19; 8:45 am]
 BILLING CODE 4910-13-P


[Federal Register: December 15, 2006 (Volume 71, Number 241)]
[Notices]
[Page 75526]
[DOCID:fr15de06-53]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission

[Docket No. ID-4048-002]

Freysinger, David R.; Notice of Filing

December 11, 2006.
    Take notice that on December 1, 2006, David R. Freysinger filed a
second supplement to his October 15, 2006 application for authority to
hold interlocking positions, pursuant to the Commission's regulations
under section 45.5(a).
    Any person desiring to intervene or to protest this filing must
file in accordance with Rules 211 and 214 of the Commission's Rules of
Practice and Procedure (18 CFR 385.211, 385.214). Protests will be
considered by the Commission in determining the appropriate action to
be taken, but will not serve to make protestants parties to the
proceeding. Any person wishing to become a party must file a notice of
intervention or motion to intervene, as appropriate. Such notices,
motions, or protests must be filed on or before the comment date.
Anyone filing a motion to intervene or protest must serve a copy of
that document on the Applicant and all the parties in this proceeding.
    The Commission encourages electronic submission of protests and
interventions in lieu of paper using the ``eFiling'' link at http://www.ferc.gov.
 Persons unable to file electronically should submit an

original and 14 copies of the protest or intervention to the Federal
Energy Regulatory Commission, 888 First Street, NE., Washington, DC
20426.
    This filing is accessible online at http://www.ferc.gov, using the

``eLibrary'' link and is available for review in the Commission's
Public Reference Room in Washington, DC. There is an ``eSubscription''
link on the Web site that enables subscribers to receive e-mail
notification when a document is added to a subscribed docket(s). For
assistance with any FERC Online service, please e-mail
<EMAIL_ADDRESS>or call<PHONE_NUMBER> (toll free). For

TTY, call<PHONE_NUMBER>.
    Comment Date: 5 p.m. eastern time on December 18, 2006.

Magalie R. Salas,
Secretary.
 [FR Doc. E6-21414 Filed 12-14-06; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 6717-01-P


[Federal Register Volume 88, Number 144 (Friday, July 28, 2023)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Pages 48718-48720]
[FR Doc No: 2023-16010]

=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION

Federal Aviation Administration

14 CFR Part 39

[Docket No. FAA-2023-0935; Project Identifier MCAI-2022-01311-T;
Amendment 39-22491; AD 2023-13-06]
RIN 2120-AA64

Airworthiness Directives; Bombardier, Inc., Airplanes

AGENCY: Federal Aviation Administration (FAA), DOT.

ACTION: Final rule.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The FAA is adopting a new airworthiness directive (AD) for all
Bombardier, Inc., Model BD-100-1A10 airplanes. This AD was prompted by
an in-service event where the nose gear door amber caution message
displayed on the crew alerting system during the initial climb after
gear retraction. This AD requires revising the existing maintenance or
inspection program, as applicable, to incorporate new or more
restrictive airworthiness limitations. The FAA is issuing this AD to
address the unsafe condition on these products.

DATES: This AD is effective September 1, 2023.
    The Director of the Federal Register approved the incorporation by
reference of certain publications listed in this AD as of September 1,
2023.

ADDRESSES:
    AD Docket: You may examine the AD docket at regulations.gov under
Docket No. FAA-2023-0935; or in person at Docket Operations between 9
a.m. and 5 p.m., Monday through Friday, except Federal holidays. The AD
docket contains this final rule, the mandatory continuing airworthiness
information (MCAI), any comments received, and other information. The
address for Docket Operations is U.S. Department of Transportation,
Docket Operations, M-30, West Building Ground Floor, Room W12-140, 1200
New Jersey Avenue SE, Washington, DC 20590.
    Material Incorporated by Reference:
     For service information identified in this final rule,
contact Bombardier Business Aircraft Customer Response Center, 400
C[ocirc]te-Vertu Road West, Dorval, Qu[eacute]bec H4S 1Y9, Canada;
telephone<PHONE_NUMBER>; email bombardier.com">[email protected]bombardier.com; website
bombardier.com.
     You may view this service information at the FAA,
Airworthiness Products Section, Operational Safety Branch, 2200 South
216th St., Des Moines, WA. For information on the availability of this
material at the FAA, call<PHONE_NUMBER>. It is also available at
regulations.gov under Docket No. FAA-2023-0935.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Gabriel D. Kim, Aviation Safety
Engineer, FAA, 1600 Stewart Avenue, Suite 410, Westbury, NY 11590;
telephone<PHONE_NUMBER>; email [email protected].

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

Background

    The FAA issued a notice of proposed rulemaking (NPRM) to amend 14
CFR part 39 by adding an AD that would apply to all Bombardier, Inc.,
Model BD-100-1A10 airplanes. The NPRM published in the Federal Register
on April 25, 2023 (88 FR 24924). The NPRM was prompted by AD CF-2022-
57, dated October 5, 2022, issued by Transport Canada, which is the
aviation authority for Canada (referred to after this as the MCAI). The
MCAI states an in-service event occurred where the nose gear door amber
caution message displayed on the crew alerting system during the
initial climb after gear retraction. After landing, an inspection found
that one of the nose landing gear (NLG) door hinge fitting assemblies
were broken. The absence of an inspection to detect cracks in the
fillet radii of the NLG door hinge fitting could result in door
misalignment with the airplane.
    In the NPRM, the FAA proposed to require revising the existing
maintenance or inspection program, as applicable, to incorporate new or
more restrictive airworthiness limitations. The FAA is issuing this AD
to address cracked fillet radii of NLG door hinge fittings. The unsafe
condition, if not addressed, could result in a NLG door misalignment,
which could increase the drag and yawing movement during flight, could
cause jamming of the door affecting the ability to extend or retract
the NLG, or could potentially result in the NLG door detaching from the
airplane.
    You may examine the MCAI in the AD docket at regulations.gov under
Docket No. FAA-2023-0935.

Discussion of Final Airworthiness Directive

Comments

    The FAA received no comments on the NPRM or on the determination of
the cost to the public.

Conclusion

    This product has been approved by the aviation authority of another
country and is approved for operation in the United States. Pursuant to
the FAA's bilateral agreement with this State of Design Authority, it
has notified the FAA of the unsafe condition described in the MCAI
referenced above. The FAA reviewed the relevant data and determined
that air safety requires adopting this AD as proposed. Accordingly, the
FAA is issuing this AD to address the unsafe condition on this product.
Except for minor editorial changes, this AD is adopted as proposed in
the NPRM. None of the changes will increase the economic burden on any
operator.

Related Service Information Under 1 CFR Part 51

    The FAA reviewed Bombardier Challenger 300 BD-100 Time Limits/
Maintenance Checks Temporary Revision (TR) TR5-2-101, dated June 30,
2022; and (Bombardier) Challenger 350 BD-100 Time Limits/Maintenance
Checks Temporary Revision TR5-2-30, dated June 30, 2022. This service
information specifies new or more restrictive airworthiness limitations
for the NLG door hinge fittings fillet radii. These documents are
distinct because they apply to different airplane configurations.
    This service information is reasonably available because the
interested parties have access to it through their normal course of
business or by the means identified in the ADDRESSES section.

Costs of Compliance

    The FAA estimates that this AD, would affect 716 airplanes of U.S.
registry. The FAA estimates the following costs to comply with this AD:
    The FAA has determined that revising the maintenance or inspection
program takes an average of 90 work-hours per operator, although the
agency recognizes that this number may vary from operator to operator.
Since operators incorporate maintenance or inspection program changes
for their affected fleet(s), the FAA has determined that a per-operator
estimate is more accurate than a per-airplane

estimate. Therefore, the agency estimates the average total cost per
operator to be $7,650 (90 work-hours x $85 per work-hour).

Authority for This Rulemaking

    Title 49 of the United States Code specifies the FAA's authority to
issue rules on aviation safety. Subtitle I, section 106, describes the
authority of the FAA Administrator. Subtitle VII: Aviation Programs,
describes in more detail the scope of the Agency's authority.
    The FAA is issuing this rulemaking under the authority described in
Subtitle VII, Part A, Subpart III, Section 44701: General requirements.
Under that section, Congress charges the FAA with promoting safe flight
of civil aircraft in air commerce by prescribing regulations for
practices, methods, and procedures the Administrator finds necessary
for safety in air commerce. This regulation is within the scope of that
authority because it addresses an unsafe condition that is likely to
exist or develop on products identified in this rulemaking action.

Regulatory Findings

    This AD will not have federalism implications under Executive Order
13132. This AD will not have a substantial direct effect on the States,
on the relationship between the national government and the States, or
on the distribution of power and responsibilities among the various
levels of government.
    For the reasons discussed above, I certify that this AD:
    (1) Is not a ``significant regulatory action'' under Executive
Order 12866,
    (2) Will not affect intrastate aviation in Alaska, and
    (3) Will not have a significant economic impact, positive or
negative, on a substantial number of small entities under the criteria
of the Regulatory Flexibility Act.

List of Subjects in 14 CFR Part 39

    Air transportation, Aircraft, Aviation safety, Incorporation by
reference, Safety.

The Amendment

    Accordingly, under the authority delegated to me by the
Administrator, the FAA amends 14 CFR part 39 as follows:

PART 39--AIRWORTHINESS DIRECTIVES

0
1. The authority citation for part 39 continues to read as follows:

    Authority: 49 U.S.C. 106(g), 40113, 44701.

Sec.  39.13  [Amended]

0
2. The FAA amends Sec.  39.13 by adding the following new airworthiness
directive:

2023-13-06 Bombardier, Inc.: Amendment 39-22491; Docket No. FAA-
2023-0935; Project Identifier MCAI-2022-01311-T.

(a) Effective Date

    This airworthiness directive (AD) is effective September 1,
2023.

(b) Affected ADs

    None.

(c) Applicability

    This AD applies to all Bombardier, Inc., Model BD-100-1A10
airplanes, certificated in any category.

(d) Subject

    Air Transport Association (ATA) of America Code 05, Time limits/
maintenance checks; 32, Landing Gear.

(e) Reason

    This AD was prompted by an in-service event that occurred where
the nose gear door amber caution message displayed on the crew
alerting system during the initial climb after gear retraction. The
FAA is issuing this AD to address cracked fillet radii of the nose
landing gear (NLG) door hinge fittings. The unsafe condition, if not
addressed, could result in a NLG door misalignment, which could
increase the drag and yawing movement during flight, could cause
jamming of the door affecting the ability to extend or retract the
NLG, or could potentially result in the NLG door detaching from the
airplane.

(f) Compliance

    Comply with this AD within the compliance times specified,
unless already done.

(g) Maintenance or Inspection Program Revision

    Within 60 days after the effective date of this AD, revise the
existing maintenance and inspection program, as applicable, to
incorporate the information specified in Bombardier Challenger 300
BD-100 Time Limits/Maintenance Checks Temporary Revision (TR) TR5-2-
101, dated June 30, 2022; or (Bombardier) Challenger 350 BD-100 Time
Limits/Maintenance Checks TR TR5-2-30, dated June 30, 2022; as
applicable. The initial compliance time for doing the tasks is at
the time specified in Bombardier Challenger 300 BD-100 Time Limits/
Maintenance Checks Temporary Revision (TR) TR5-2-101, dated June 30,
2022; or (Bombardier) Challenger 350 BD-100 Time Limits/Maintenance
Checks TR TR5-2-30, dated June 30, 2022; as applicable, or within 60
days after the effective date of this AD, whichever occurs later.

(h) No Alternative Actions or Intervals

    After the existing maintenance or inspection program has been
revised as required by paragraph (g) of this AD, no alternative
actions (e.g., inspections) or intervals, may be used unless the
actions and intervals, are approved as an alternative method of
compliance (AMOC) in accordance with the procedures specified in
paragraph (i)(1) of this AD.

(i) Other FAA AD Provisions

    The following provisions also apply to this AD:
    (1) Alternative Methods of Compliance (AMOCs): The Manager,
International Validation Branch, FAA, has the authority to approve
AMOCs for this AD, if requested using the procedures found in 14 CFR
39.19. In accordance with 14 CFR 39.19, send your request to your
principal inspector or responsible Flight Standards Office, as
appropriate. If sending information directly to the manager of the
certification office, send it to ATTN: Manager, FAA, International
Validation Branch, 1600 Stewart Avenue, Suite 410, Westbury, NY
11590; telephone<PHONE_NUMBER>. Before using any approved AMOC,
notify your appropriate principal inspector, or lacking a principal
inspector, the manager of the responsible Flight Standards Office.
    (2) Contacting the Manufacturer: For any requirement in this AD
to obtain instructions from a manufacturer, the instructions must be
accomplished using a method approved by the Manager, International
Validation Branch, FAA; or Transport Canada; or Bombardier, Inc.'s
Transport Canada Design Approval Organization (DAO). If approved by
the DAO, the approval must include the DAO-authorized signature.

(j) Additional Information

    (1) Refer to Transport Canada AD CF-2022-57, dated October 5,
2022, for related information. This Transport Canada AD may be found
in the AD docket at regulations.gov under Docket No. FAA-2023-0935.
    (2) For more information about this AD, contact Gabriel D. Kim,
Aviation Safety Engineer, FAA, 1600 Stewart Avenue, Suite 410,
Westbury, NY 11590; telephone<PHONE_NUMBER>; email [email protected].

(k) Material Incorporated by Reference

    (1) The Director of the Federal Register approved the
incorporation by reference of the service information listed in this
paragraph under 5 U.S.C. 552(a) and 1 CFR part 51.
    (2) You must use this service information as applicable to do
the actions required by this AD, unless this AD specifies otherwise.
    (i) Bombardier Challenger 300 BD-100 Time Limits/Maintenance
Checks Temporary Revision (TR) TR5-2-101, dated June 30, 2022.
    (ii) (Bombardier) Challenger 350 BD-100 Time Limits/Maintenance
Checks Temporary Revision TR5-2-30, dated June 30, 2022.
    (3) For Bombardier service information identified in this AD,
contact Bombardier Business Aircraft Customer Response Center, 400
C[ocirc]te-Vertu Road West, Dorval, Qu[eacute]bec H4S 1Y9, Canada;
telephone<PHONE_NUMBER>; email bombardier.com">[email protected]bombardier.com; website
bombardier.com.

    (4) You may view this service information at the FAA,
Airworthiness Products Section, Operational Safety Branch, 2200
South 216th St., Des Moines, WA. For information on the availability
of this material at the FAA, call<PHONE_NUMBER>.
    (5) You may view this service information that is incorporated
by reference at the National Archives and Records Administration
(NARA). For information on the availability of this material at
NARA, email [email protected], or go to: www.archives.gov/federal-register/cfr/ibr-locations.html.

    Issued on July 21, 2023.
Victor Wicklund,
Deputy Director, Compliance & Airworthiness Division, Aircraft
Certification Service.
[FR Doc. 2023-16010 Filed 7-27-23; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910-13-P


[Federal Register Volume 75, Number 248 (Tuesday, December 28, 2010)]
[Proposed Rules]
[Pages 81517-81518]
[FR Doc No: 2010-32568]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION

Federal Aviation Administration

14 CFR Part 71

[Docket No. FAA-2010-1009; Airspace Docket No. 10-ANE-111]

Proposed Establishment of Class E Airspace; Lancaster, NH

AGENCY: Federal Aviation Administration (FAA), DOT.

ACTION: Notice of proposed rulemaking (NPRM).

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: This action proposes to establish Class E Airspace at
Lancaster, NH to accommodate a new Area Navigation (RNAV) Global
Positioning System (GPS) special Standard Instrument Approach Procedure
(SIAP) serving the Weeks Medical Center Heliport. This action would
enhance the safety and airspace management of Instrument Flight Rules
(IFR) operations within the National Airspace System.

DATES: Comments must be received on or before February 11, 2011.

ADDRESSES: Send comments on this rule to: U.S. Department of
Transportation, Docket Operations, West Building Ground Floor, Room
W12-140, 1200 New Jersey Ave., SE., Washington, DC 20590-0001;
Telephone: 1-800-647-5527; Fax:<PHONE_NUMBER>. You must identify the
Docket Number FAA-2010-1009; Airspace Docket No. 10-ANE-111, at the
beginning of your comments. You may also submit and review received
comments through the Internet at http://www.regulations.gov.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Richard Horrocks, Operations Support
Group, Eastern Service Center, Federal Aviation Administration, P.O.
Box 20636, Atlanta, Georgia 30320; telephone<PHONE_NUMBER>.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

Comments Invited

    Interested persons are invited to comment on this rule by
submitting such written data, views, or arguments, as they may desire.
Comments that provide the factual basis supporting the views and
suggestions presented are particularly helpful in developing reasoned
regulatory decisions on the proposal. Comments are specifically invited
on the overall regulatory, aeronautical, economic, environmental, and
energy-related aspects of the proposal.
    Communications should identify both docket numbers (FAA Docket No.
FAA-2010-1009; Airspace Docket No. 10-ANE-111) and be submitted in
triplicate to the Docket Management System (see ADDRESSES section for
address and phone number). You may also submit comments through the
Internet at http://www.regulations.gov.
    Commenters wishing the FAA to acknowledge receipt of their comments
on this action must submit with those comments a self-addressed stamped
postcard on which the following statement is made: ``Comments to Docket
No. FAA-2010-1009; Airspace Docket No. 10-ANE-111.'' The postcard will
be date/time stamped and returned to the commenter.
    All communications received before the specified closing date for
comments will be considered before taking action on the proposed rule.
The proposal contained in this notice may be changed in light of the
comments received. A report summarizing each substantive public contact
with FAA personnel concerned with this rulemaking will be filed in the
docket.

Availability of NPRMs

    An electronic copy of this document may be downloaded from and
comments submitted through http://www.regulations.gov. Recently
published rulemaking documents can also be accessed through the FAA's
Web page at http://www.faa.gov/airports_airtraffic/air_traffic/publications/airspace_amendments/.
    You may review the public docket containing the proposal, any
comments received and any final disposition in person in the Dockets
Office (see the ADDRESSES section for address and phone number) between
9 a.m. and 5 p.m., Monday through Friday, except Federal Holidays. An
informal docket may also be examined during normal business hours at
the office of the Eastern Service Center, Federal Aviation
Administration, room 210, 1701 Columbia Avenue, College Park, Georgia
30337.
    Persons interested in being placed on a mailing list for future
NPRMs should contact the FAA's Office of Rulemaking,<PHONE_NUMBER>, to
request a copy of Advisory circular No. 11-2A, Notice of Proposed
Rulemaking Distribution System, which describes the application
procedure.

The Proposal

    The FAA is considering an amendment to Title 14, Code of Federal
Regulations (14 CFR) part 71 to establish Class E airspace at
Lancaster, NH providing the controlled airspace required to support the
new Copter RNAV GPS special standard instrument approach procedures for
Weeks Medical Center Heliport. Controlled airspace extending upward
from 700 feet above the surface is required for IFR operations within a
6-mile radius of the point in space coordinates for the heliport.
    Class E airspace designations are published in Paragraph 6005 of
FAA order 7400.9U, dated August 18, 2010, and effective September 15,
2010, which is incorporated by reference in 14 CFR 71.1. The Class E
airspace designation listed in this document will be published
subsequently in the Order.
    The FAA has determined that this proposed regulation only involves
an established body of technical regulations for which frequent and
routine amendments are necessary to keep them operationally current.
It, therefore, (1) Is not a ``significant regulatory action'' under
Executive Order 12866; (2) is not a ``significant rule'' under DOT
Regulatory Policies and Procedures (44 FR 11034; February 26, 1979);
and (3) does not warrant

preparation of a Regulatory Evaluation as the anticipated impact is so
minimal. Since this is a routine matter that will only affect air
traffic procedures and air navigation, it is certified that this
proposed rule, when promulgated, would not have a significant economic
impact on a substantial number of small entities under the criteria of
the Regulatory Flexibility Act.
    The FAA's authority to issue rules regarding aviation safety is
found in Title 49 of the United States Code. Subtitle I, section 106
describes the authority of the FAA Administrator. Subtitle VII,
Aviation Programs, describes in more detail the scope of the agency's
authority. This proposed rulemaking is promulgated under the authority
described in subtitle VII, part A, subpart I, section 40103. Under that
section, the FAA is charged with prescribing regulations to assign the
use of airspace necessary to ensure the safety of aircraft and the
efficient use of airspace. This proposed regulation is within the scope
of that authority as it would establish Class E airspace at Weeks
Medical Center Heliport, Lancaster, NH.

List of Subjects in 14 CFR Part 71

    Airspace, Incorporation by reference, Navigation (Air).

The Proposed Amendment

    In consideration of the foregoing, the Federal Aviation
Administration proposes to amend 14 CFR part 71 as follows:

PART 71--DESIGNATION OF CLASS A, B, C, D, AND CLASS E AIRSPACE
AREAS; AIR TRAFFIC SERVICE ROUTES; AND REPORTING POINTS

    1. The authority citation for part 71 continues to read as follows:

    Authority: 49 U.S.C. 106(g); 40103, 40113, 40120; E.O. 10854, 24
FR 9565, 3 CFR, 1959-1963 Comp., p. 389.

Sec.  71.1  [Amended]

    2. The incorporation by reference in 14 CFR 71.1 of Federal
Aviation Administration Order 7400.9U, Airspace Designations and
Reporting Points, dated August 18, 2010, effective September 15, 2010,
is amended as follows:

Paragraph 6005 Class E Airspace Areas Extending Upward from 700
Feet or More Above the Surface of the Earth.

* * * * *

ANE NH E5 Lancaster, NH [New]

Weeks Medical Center Heliport, NH
    (Lat. 44[deg]29'07'' N., long. 71[deg]33'17'' W.)
Point in Space Coordinates
    (Lat. 44[deg]29'33'' N., long. 71[deg]34'41'' W.)

    That airspace extending upward from 700 feet above the surface
within a 6-mile radius of the Point in Space Coordinates (lat.
44[deg]29'33'' N., long. 71[deg]34'41'' W.) serving the Weeks
Medical Center Heliport.

    Issued in College Park, Georgia, on December 13, 2010.
Mark D. Ward,
Manager, Operations Support Group, Eastern Service Center, Air Traffic
Organization.
[FR Doc. 2010-32568 Filed 12-27-10; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910-13-P


[Federal Register: March 25, 2009 (Volume 74, Number 56)]
[Proposed Rules]
[Page 12776]
[DOCID:fr25mr09-51]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY

40 CFR Part 52

[EPA-R01-OAR-2008-0796; A-1-FRL-8785-7]

Approval and Promulgation of Air Quality Implementation Plans;
Rhode Island; Carbon Monoxide Limited Maintenance Plan for Providence,
RI

AGENCY: Environmental Protection Agency (EPA).

ACTION: Proposed rule.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The EPA is proposing to approve a State Implementation Plan
(SIP) revision submitted by the State of Rhode Island. This revision
establishes a limited maintenance plan for the Providence, Rhode Island
carbon monoxide attainment area and addresses the remaining portion of
the ten-year update to the carbon monoxide maintenance plan. This
action is being taken in accordance with the Clean Air Act.

DATES: Written comments must be received on or before April 24, 2009.

ADDRESSES: Submit your comments, identified by Docket ID No. EPA-R01-
OAR-2008-0796 by one of the following methods:
    1. www.regulations.gov: Follow the on-line instructions for
submitting comments.
    2. E-mail<EMAIL_ADDRESS>    3. Mail: ``EPA-R01-OAR-2008-0796'', Anne Arnold, U.S. Environmental
Protection Agency, EPA New England Regional Office, One Congress
Street, Suite 1100 (mail code CAQ), Boston, MA 02114-2023.
    4. Hand Delivery or Courier. Deliver your comments to: Anne Arnold,
Manager, Air Quality Planning Unit, Office of Ecosystem Protection,
U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, EPA New England Regional Office,
One Congress Street, 11th floor, (CAQ), Boston, MA 02114-2023. Such
deliveries are only accepted during the Regional Office's normal hours
of operation. The Regional Office's official hours of business are
Monday through Friday, 8:30 to 4:30, excluding legal holidays.
    Please see the direct final rule which is located in the Rules
Section of this Federal Register for detailed instructions on how to
submit comments.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Donald O. Cooke, Air Quality Unit,
U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, EPA New England Regional Office,
One Congress Street, Suite 1100 (CAQ), Boston, MA 02114-2023, telephone
number<PHONE_NUMBER>, fax number<PHONE_NUMBER>, e-mail
<EMAIL_ADDRESS>
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: In the Final Rules Section of this Federal
Register, EPA is approving the State's SIP submittal as a direct final
rule without prior proposal because the Agency views this as a
noncontroversial submittal and anticipates no adverse comments. A
detailed rationale for the approval is set forth in the direct final
rule. If no adverse comments are received in response to this action
rule, no further activity is contemplated. If EPA receives adverse
comments, the direct final rule will be withdrawn and all public
comments received will be addressed in a subsequent final rule based on
this proposed rule. EPA will not institute a second comment period. Any
parties interested in commenting on this action should do so at this
time. Please note that if EPA receives adverse comment on an amendment,
paragraph, or section of this rule and if that provision may be severed
from the remainder of the rule, EPA may adopt as final those provisions
of the rule that are not the subject of an adverse comment.
    For additional information, see the direct final rule which is
located in the Rules Section of this Federal Register.

    Dated: March 12, 2009.
Ira W. Leighton,
Acting Regional Administrator, EPA New England.
[FR Doc. E9-6639 Filed 3-24-09; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 6560-50-P


[Federal Register Volume 83, Number 71 (Thursday, April 12, 2018)]
[Notices]
[Pages 15833-15834]
[FR Doc No: 2018-07643]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY

[EPA-HQ-OPP-2017-0007; FRL-9975-56]

Pesticide Product Registration; Receipt of Applications for New
Active Ingredients

AGENCY: Environmental Protection Agency (EPA).

ACTION: Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: EPA has received applications to register pesticide products
containing active ingredients not included in any currently registered
pesticide products. Pursuant to the Federal Insecticide, Fungicide, and
Rodenticide Act (FIFRA), EPA is hereby providing notice of receipt and
opportunity to comment on these applications.

DATES: Comments must be received on or before May 14, 2018.

ADDRESSES: Submit your comments, identified by the Docket
Identification (ID) Number and the File Symbol of interest as shown in
the body of this document, by one of the following methods:
     Federal eRulemaking Portal: http://www.regulations.gov.
Follow the online instructions for submitting comments. Do not submit
electronically any information you consider to be Confidential Business
Information (CBI) or other information whose disclosure is restricted
by statute.
     Mail: OPP Docket, Environmental Protection Agency Docket
Center (EPA/DC), (28221T), 1200 Pennsylvania Ave. NW, Washington, DC
20460-0001.
     Hand Delivery: To make special arrangements for hand
delivery or delivery of boxed information, please follow the
instructions at http://www.epa.gov/dockets/contacts.html. Additional
instructions on commenting or visiting the docket, along with more

information about dockets generally, is available at http://www.epa.gov/dockets.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:  Robert McNally, Biopesticides and
Pollution Prevention Division (7511P), main telephone number: (703)
305-7090, email address: [email protected]; or Michael Goodis,
Registration Division (7505P), main telephone number:<PHONE_NUMBER>,
email address: [email protected]. The mailing address for each
contact person is: Office of Pesticide Programs, Environmental
Protection Agency, 1200 Pennsylvania Ave. NW, Washington, DC 20460-
0001. As part of the mailing address, include the contact person's
name, division, and mail code. The division to contact is listed at the
end of each application summary.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

I. General Information

A. Does this action apply to me?

    You may be potentially affected by this action if you are an
agricultural producer, food manufacturer, or pesticide manufacturer.
The following list of North American Industrial Classification System
(NAICS) codes is not intended to be exhaustive, but rather provides a
guide to help readers determine whether this document applies to them.
Potentially affected entities may include:
     Crop production (NAICS code 111).
     Animal production (NAICS code 112).
     Food manufacturing (NAICS code 311).
     Pesticide manufacturing (NAICS code 32532).

B. What should I consider as I prepare my comments for EPA?

    1. Submitting CBI. Do not submit this information to EPA through
regulations.gov or email. Clearly mark the part or all of the
information that you claim to be CBI. For CBI information in a disk or
CD-ROM that you mail to EPA, mark the outside of the disk or CD-ROM as
CBI and then identify electronically within the disk or CD-ROM the
specific information that is claimed as CBI. In addition to one
complete version of the comment that includes information claimed as
CBI, a copy of the comment that does not contain the information
claimed as CBI must be submitted for inclusion in the public docket.
Information so marked will not be disclosed except in accordance with
procedures set forth in 40 CFR part 2.
    2. Tips for preparing your comments. When preparing and submitting
your comments, see the commenting tips at http://www.epa.gov/dockets/comments.html.

II. Registration Applications

    EPA has received applications to register pesticide products
containing active ingredients not included in any currently registered
pesticide products. Pursuant to the provisions of FIFRA section 3(c)(4)
(7 U.S.C. 136a(c)(4)), EPA is hereby providing notice of receipt and
opportunity to comment on these applications. Notice of receipt of
these applications does not imply a decision by the Agency on these
applications.

III. New Active Ingredients

    1. File Symbol: 73729-E. Docket ID number: EPA-HQ-OPP-2018-0087.
Applicant: Imerys Filtration Minerals, Inc., 2500 Miguelito Rd.,
Lompoc, CA 93436. Product name: Imergard WP. Active ingredient:
Insecticide--Expanded perlite at 100.0%. Proposed use: For use indoors
and outdoors to control mosquitoes. Contact: BPPD.
    2. File Symbol: 80286-EA. Docket ID numbers: EPA-HQ-OPP-2017-0708
and EPA-HQ-OPP-2017-0709. Applicant: ISCA Technologies, Inc., 1230 W.
Spring St., Riverside, CA 92507. Product name: Hook RPW. Active
ingredients: Attractant--4-methyl-5-nonanone at 3.000%; Attractant--4-
methyl-5-nonanol at 27.000%; and Insecticide--cypermethrin at 3.000%.
Proposed use: For control of red palm weevil. Contact: BPPD.
    3. File Symbol: 71840-E.O.. Docket ID number: EPA-HQ-OPP-2018-0059.
Applicant: BASF Corporation, 26 Davis Dr., Research Triangle Park, NC
27709. Product name: Trunemco Nematode Management. Active ingredients:
Systemic acquired resistance (SAR) inducer--cis-Jasmone (2-Cyclopenten-
1-one, 3-methyl-2-(2Z)-2-pentenyl-) at 0.88% and Bacillus
amyloliquefaciens strain MBI 600 at 1.00%. Proposed use: Seed treatment
on corn, cotton, and soybean. Contact: BPPD.
    4. File Symbol: 40230-G. Docket ID number: EPA-HQ-OPP-2018-0051.
Applicant: AgBioChem, Inc., 3750 North 1020 East, Provo, UT 84604.
Product name: Galltrol-GM. Active ingredient: Bactericide--Rhizobium
radiobacter strain K1026-R at 0.03%. Proposed use: For control of crown
gall disease in germinating seeds, roots, stems, and cuttings. Contact:
BPPD.
    5. File Symbol: 71840-GN. Docket ID number: EPA-HQ-OPP-2018-0059.
Applicant: BASF Corporation, 26 Davis Dr., Research Triangle Park, NC
27709. Product name: Jasmone Technical Concentrate. Active ingredient:
Systemic acquired resistance (SAR) inducer--cis-Jasmone (2-Cyclopenten-
1-one, 3-methyl-2-(2Z)-2-pentenyl-) at 93.00%. Proposed use: For
manufacturing end-use pesticide products containing cis-Jasmone.
Contact: BPPD.
    6. EPA Registration Numbers: 7969-198, 7969-251, 7969-197, 7969-
199. Docket ID number: EPA-HQ-OPP-2017-0310. Applicant: BASF
Corporation, P.O. Box 13528, 26 Davis Drive, Research Triangle Park, NC
27709. Active ingredient: Boscalid. Product type: Fungicide. Proposed
use: Brassica, leafy greens, subgroup 4-16B; celtuce; fennel, Florence;
kohlrabi; leafy petiole vegetable, subgroup 22B; leafy greens, subgroup
4-16A; pea and bean, dried shelled, except soybean, subgroup 6C; pea
and bean, succulent shelled, subgroup 6B; vegetable, brassica, head and
stem, group 5-16; vegetable, cucurbit, group 9; vegetable, root, except
sugar beet, subgroup 1B; vegetable, fruiting, group 8-10. Contact: RD

    Authority:  21 U.S.C. 346a.

    Dated: March 20, 2018.
Delores Barber,
Director, Information Technology and Resources Management Division,
Office of Pesticide Programs.
[FR Doc. 2018-07643 Filed 4-11-18; 8:45 am]
 BILLING CODE 6560-50-P


[Federal Register: July 27, 2010 (Volume 75, Number 143)]
[Proposed Rules]
[Page 43882-43884]
[DOCID:fr27jy10-24]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION

Federal Aviation Administration

14 CFR Part 39

[Docket No. FAA-2010-0700; Directorate Identifier 2010-NM-123-AD]
RIN 2120-AA64

Airworthiness Directives; Bombardier, Inc. Model CL-600-2C10
(Regional Jet Series 700, 701, & 702), CL-600-2D15 (Regional Jet Series
705), and CL-600-2D24 (Regional Jet Series 900) Airplanes

AGENCY: Federal Aviation Administration (FAA), DOT.

ACTION: Notice of proposed rulemaking (NPRM).

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: We propose to adopt a new airworthiness directive (AD) for the
products listed above. This proposed AD results from mandatory
continuing airworthiness information (MCAI) originated by an aviation
authority of another country to identify and correct an unsafe
condition on an aviation product. The MCAI describes the unsafe
condition as:

    The manufacturer has informed Transport Canada that a certain
number of the resolver stators, which were installed in the angle of
attack (AOA) transducers, were not cleaned correctly. This condition
can degrade the AOA transducer performance at low temperatures
resulting in freezing of the AOA transducer resolver, which may
provide inaccurate AOA data to the Stall Protection System (SPS). If
not corrected, this condition can result in early or late activation
of the stick shaker and/or stick pusher.

    These conditions could result in reduced ability of the flight crew
to maintain a safe flight and landing of the airplane. The proposed AD
would require actions that are intended to address the unsafe condition
described in the MCAI.

DATES: We must receive comments on this proposed AD by September 10,
2010.

ADDRESSES: You may send comments by any of the following methods:
     Federal eRulemaking Portal: Go to http://
www.regulations.gov. Follow the instructions for submitting comments.
     Fax:<PHONE_NUMBER>.
     Mail: U.S. Department of Transportation, Docket
Operations, M-30, West Building Ground Floor, Room W12-140, 1200 New
Jersey Avenue, SE., Washington, DC 20590.
     Hand Delivery: U.S. Department of Transportation, Docket
Operations, M-30, West Building Ground Floor, Room W12-40, 1200 New
Jersey Avenue, SE., Washington, DC, between 9 a.m. and 5 p.m., Monday
through Friday, except Federal holidays.
    For service information identified in this proposed AD, contact
Bombardier, Inc., 400 C[ocirc]te-Vertu Road West, Dorval, Qu[eacute]bec
H4S 1Y9, Canada; telephone<PHONE_NUMBER>; fax<PHONE_NUMBER>; e-mail
<EMAIL_ADDRESS>Internet http://www.bombardier.com. You
may review copies of the referenced service information at the FAA,
Transport Airplane Directorate, 1601 Lind Avenue, SW., Renton,
Washington. For information on the availability of this material at the
FAA, call<PHONE_NUMBER>.

Examining the AD Docket

    You may examine the AD docket on the Internet at http://
www.regulations.gov; or in person at the Docket Operations office
between 9 a.m. and 5 p.m., Monday through Friday, except Federal
holidays. The AD docket contains this proposed AD, the regulatory
evaluation, any comments received, and other information. The street
address for the Docket Operations office (telephone<PHONE_NUMBER>) is
in the ADDRESSES section. Comments will be available in the AD docket
shortly after receipt.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Joseph Licata, Aerospace Engineer,
Avionics and Flight Test Branch, ANE-172, FAA, New York Aircraft
Certification Office (ACO), 1600 Stewart Avenue, Suite 410, Westbury,
New York 11590; telephone<PHONE_NUMBER>; fax<PHONE_NUMBER>.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

Comments Invited

    We invite you to send any written relevant data, views, or
arguments about this proposed AD. Send your comments to an address
listed under the ADDRESSES section. Include ``Docket No. FAA-2010-0700;
Directorate Identifier 2010-NM-123-AD'' at the beginning of your
comments. We specifically invite comments on the overall regulatory,
economic, environmental, and energy aspects of this proposed AD. We
will consider all comments received by the closing date and may amend
this proposed AD based on those comments.
    We have lengthened the 30-day comment period for proposed ADs that
address MCAI originated by aviation authorities of other countries to
provide adequate time for interested parties to submit comments. The
comment period for these proposed ADs is now typically 45 days, which
is consistent with the comment period for domestic transport ADs.
    We will post all comments we receive, without change, to http://
www.regulations.gov, including any personal information you provide. We
will also post a report summarizing each substantive verbal contact we
receive about this proposed AD.

Discussion

    Transport Canada Civil Aviation (TCCA), which is the aviation
authority for Canada, has issued Canadian Airworthiness Directive CF-
2010-13, dated May 6, 2010 (referred to after this as ``the MCAI''), to
correct an unsafe condition for the specified products. The MCAI
states:

    The manufacturer has informed Transport Canada that a certain
number of the resolver stators, which were installed in the angle of
attack (AOA) transducers, were not cleaned correctly. This condition
can degrade the AOA transducer performance at low temperatures
resulting in freezing of the AOA transducer resolver, which may
provide inaccurate AOA data to the Stall Protection System (SPS). If
not corrected, this condition can result in early or late activation
of the stick shaker and/or stick pusher.

    These conditions could result in reduced ability of the flight crew
to maintain a safe flight and landing of the airplane. The required
actions include an inspection to determine if certain AOA transducers
are installed and replacement of affected transducers. You may obtain
further information by examining the MCAI in the AD docket.

Relevant Service Information

    Bombardier has issued Alert Service Bulletin A670BA-27-054,
Revision A, dated January 18, 2010. The actions described in this
service information are intended to correct the unsafe condition
identified in the MCAI.

FAA's Determination and Requirements of This Proposed AD

    This product has been approved by the aviation authority of another
country, and is approved for operation in the United States. Pursuant
to our bilateral agreement with the State of Design Authority, we have
been notified of the unsafe condition described in the MCAI and service
information referenced above. We are proposing this AD because we
evaluated all pertinent information and determined an unsafe condition
exists and is likely to exist or develop on other products of the same
type design.

Differences Between This AD and the MCAI or Service Information

    We have reviewed the MCAI and related service information and, in
general, agree with their substance. But

we might have found it necessary to use different words from those in
the MCAI to ensure the AD is clear for U.S. operators and is
enforceable. In making these changes, we do not intend to differ
substantively from the information provided in the MCAI and related
service information.
    We might also have proposed different actions in this AD from those
in the MCAI in order to follow FAA policies. Any such differences are
highlighted in a NOTE within the proposed AD.

Costs of Compliance

    Based on the service information, we estimate that this proposed AD
would affect about 380 products of U.S. registry. We also estimate that
it would take about 1 work-hour per product to comply with the basic
requirements of this proposed AD. The average labor rate is $85 per
work-hour. Based on these figures, we estimate the cost of the proposed
AD on U.S. operators to be $32,300, or $85 per product.

Authority for This Rulemaking

    Title 49 of the United States Code specifies the FAA's authority to
issue rules on aviation safety. Subtitle I, section 106, describes the
authority of the FAA Administrator. ``Subtitle VII: Aviation
Programs,'' describes in more detail the scope of the Agency's
authority.
    We are issuing this rulemaking under the authority described in
``Subtitle VII, Part A, Subpart III, Section 44701: General
requirements.'' Under that section, Congress charges the FAA with
promoting safe flight of civil aircraft in air commerce by prescribing
regulations for practices, methods, and procedures the Administrator
finds necessary for safety in air commerce. This regulation is within
the scope of that authority because it addresses an unsafe condition
that is likely to exist or develop on products identified in this
rulemaking action.

Regulatory Findings

    We determined that this proposed AD would not have federalism
implications under Executive Order 13132. This proposed AD would not
have a substantial direct effect on the States, on the relationship
between the national Government and the States, or on the distribution
of power and responsibilities among the various levels of government.
    For the reasons discussed above, I certify this proposed
regulation:
    1. Is not a ``significant regulatory action'' under Executive Order
12866;
    2. Is not a ``significant rule'' under the DOT Regulatory Policies
and Procedures (44 FR 11034, February 26, 1979); and
    3. Will not have a significant economic impact, positive or
negative, on a substantial number of small entities under the criteria
of the Regulatory Flexibility Act.
    We prepared a regulatory evaluation of the estimated costs to
comply with this proposed AD and placed it in the AD docket.

List of Subjects in 14 CFR Part 39

    Air transportation, Aircraft, Aviation safety, Incorporation by
reference, Safety.

The Proposed Amendment

    Accordingly, under the authority delegated to me by the
Administrator, the FAA proposes to amend 14 CFR part 39 as follows:

PART 39--AIRWORTHINESS DIRECTIVES

    1. The authority citation for part 39 continues to read as follows:

    Authority:  49 U.S.C. 106(g), 40113, 44701.

Sec.  39.13  [Amended]

    2. The FAA amends Sec.  39.13 by adding the following new AD:

Bombardier, Inc.: Docket No. FAA-2010-0700; Directorate Identifier
2010-NM-123-AD.

Comments Due Date

    (a) We must receive comments by September 10, 2010.

Affected ADs

    (b) None.

Applicability

    (c) This AD applies to Bombardier, Inc. Model CL-600-2C10
(Regional Jet Series 700, 701, & 702), CL-600-2D15 (Regional Jet
Series 705), and CL-600-2D24 (Regional Jet Series 900) airplanes,
certificated in any category, equipped with Thales angle of attack
transducers having part number (P/N) C16258AA.

Subject

    (d) Air Transport Association (ATA) of America Code 27: Flight
Controls.

Reason

    (e) The mandatory continuing airworthiness information (MCAI)
states:

    ``The manufacturer has informed Transport Canada that a certain
number of the resolver stators, which were installed in the angle of
attack (AOA) transducers, were not cleaned correctly. This condition
can degrade the AOA transducer performance at low temperatures
resulting in freezing of the AOA transducer resolver, which may
provide inaccurate AOA data to the Stall Protection System (SPS). If
not corrected, this condition can result in early or late activation
of the stick shaker and/or stick pusher.''

These conditions could result in reduced ability of the flight crew
to maintain a safe flight and landing of the airplane.

Compliance

    (f) You are responsible for having the actions required by this
AD performed within the compliance times specified, unless the
actions have already been done.

Inspection

    (g) Within 750 flight hours after the effective date of this AD,
inspect the serial number of each AOA transducer having P/N C16258AA
to determine if the serial number is identified in paragraph 1.A. of
Bombardier Alert Service Bulletin A670BA-27-054, Revision A, dated
January 18, 2010, in accordance with the Accomplishment Instructions
of Bombardier Alert Service Bulletin A670BA-27-054, Revision A,
dated January 18, 2010. A review of airplane maintenance records is
acceptable in lieu of this inspection if the serial number of the
AOA transducer can be conclusively determined from that review.
    (1) If the serial number is not listed in paragraph 1.A. of
Bombardier Alert Service Bulletin A670BA-27-054, Revision A, dated
January 18, 2010, no further action is required by this AD other
than compliance with paragraph (h) of this AD.
    (2) If the serial number is listed in paragraph 1.A. of
Bombardier Alert Service Bulletin A670BA-27-054, Revision A, dated
January 18, 2010, and has the suffix ``C'', no further action is
required by this AD other than compliance with paragraph (h) of this
AD.
    (3) If the serial number is listed in paragraph 1.A. of
Bombardier Alert Service Bulletin A670BA-27-054, Revision A, dated
January 18, 2010, and does not have the suffix ``C'', before further
flight, replace the AOA transducer with a new or serviceable
transducer, in accordance with Part C of the Accomplishment
Instructions of Bombardier Alert Service Bulletin A670BA-27-054,
Revision A, dated January 18, 2010.

    Note 1:  To replace any AOA transducer, the replacement AOA
transducer must either be outside of the affected serial numbers as
identified in paragraph 1.A. of Bombardier Alert Service Bulletin
A670BA-27-054, Revision A, dated January 18, 2010, or have the
suffix ``C''.

    (h) As of the effective date of this AD, no AOA transducer
having both a serial number and P/N C16258AA as identified in
paragraph 1.A. of Bombardier Alert Service Bulletin A670BA-27-054,
Revision A, dated January 18, 2010, may be installed on any airplane
unless the AOA transducer has been inspected by the manufacturer and
identified with the suffix ``C''.

FAA AD Differences

    Note 2: This AD differs from the MCAI and/or service information
as follows: No differences.

Other FAA AD Provisions

    (i) The following provisions also apply to this AD:
    (1) Alternative Methods of Compliance (AMOCs): The Manager, New
York Aircraft

Certification Office (ACO), ANE-170, FAA, has the authority to
approve AMOCs for this AD, if requested using the procedures found
in 14 CFR 39.19. Send information to ATTN: Program Manager,
Continuing Operational Safety, FAA, New York ACO, 1600 Stewart
Avenue, Suite 410, Westbury, New York 11590; telephone<PHONE_NUMBER>;
fax<PHONE_NUMBER>. Before using any approved AMOC on any airplane to
which the AMOC applies, notify your principal maintenance inspector
(PMI) or principal avionics inspector (PAI), as appropriate, or
lacking a principal inspector, your local Flight Standards District
Office. The AMOC approval letter must specifically reference this
AD.
    (2) Airworthy Product: For any requirement in this AD to obtain
corrective actions from a manufacturer or other source, use these
actions if they are FAA-approved. Corrective actions are considered
FAA-approved if they are approved by the State of Design Authority
(or their delegated agent). You are required to assure the product
is airworthy before it is returned to service.
    (3) Reporting Requirements: For any reporting requirement in
this AD, under the provisions of the Paperwork Reduction Act (44
U.S.C. 3501 et seq.), the Office of Management and Budget (OMB) has
approved the information collection requirements and has assigned
OMB Control Number 2120-0056.

Related Information

    (j) Refer to MCAI Canadian Airworthiness Directive CF-2010-13,
dated May 6, 2010; and Bombardier Alert Service Bulletin A670BA-27-
054, Revision A, dated January 18, 2010; for related information.

    Issued in Renton, Washington, on July 16, 2010.
Ali Bahrami,
Manager, Transport Airplane Directorate, Aircraft Certification
Service.
[FR Doc. 2010-18291 Filed 7-26-10; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910-13-P


December 7, 2000

By Facsimile

Ms. Teresa Bingham

Chief, U.S. Carrier Licensing Division

Office of International Aviation

U.S. Department of Transportation

400 Seventh Street, S.W., Room 6412

Washington, D.C. 20590

Re:	Joint Applications of Delta Air Lines, Inc. ("Delta") and Air Jamaica Limited ("Air Jamaica"), Dockets OST-97-3051

Dear Ms. Bingham:

Pursuant to the termination notice condition placed on the codeshare authority granted by Notice of Action Taken dated March 23, 2000 in the above-referenced docket, Delta and Air Jamaica hereby jointly notify the Department that Delta will cease displaying the “JM” designator code of Air Jamaica on flights operated by Delta between Atlanta and San Francisco, effective January 15, 2001.

Sincerely,

George U. Carneal

Ronald P. Brower

HOGAN & HARTSON L.L.P.

Counsel for

AIR JAMAICA LIMITED

Robert E. Cohn

Alexander Van der Bellen

SHAW PITTMAN

Counsel for

DELTA AIR LINES, INC.

cc:	Docket OST-97-3051 (by Electronic Submission)

Footnote continued from previous page

Footnote continued on next page

  STYLEREF Recipient  Ms. Teresa Bingham

June 8, 2000

Page   PAGE  2

HOGAN & HARTSON L.L.P.

Columbia Square

555 13th Street, N.W.

Washington, D.C.  20004-1109

(202) 637-6546

	SHAW PITTMAN

2300 N Street, N.W.

Washington, D.C.  20037

(202) 663-8060


[Federal Register Volume 76, Number 93 (Friday, May 13, 2011)]
[Notices]
[Pages 28024-28025]
[FR Doc No: 2011-11756]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission

Notice of FERC Staff Attendance at the Entergy Regional State
Committee Meeting

    The Federal Energy Regulatory Commission hereby gives notice that
members of its staff may attend the meetings noted below. Their
attendance is part of the Commission's ongoing outreach efforts.
    Entergy Regional State Committee Meeting.
    May 19, 2011 (1 p.m.-5 p.m.).
    May 20, 2011 (8 a.m.-12 p.m.).
    MISO, 720 City Center Drive, Carmel, Indiana 46032.
    The discussions may address matters at issue in the following
proceedings:

------------------------------------------------------------------------

------------------------------------------------------------------------
Docket No. OA07-32...................  Entergy Services, Inc.
Docket No. EL00-66...................  Louisiana Public Service
                                        Commission v. Entergy Services,
                                        Inc.
Docket No. EL01-88...................  Louisiana Public Service
                                        Commission v. Entergy Services,
                                        Inc.
Docket No. EL07-52...................  Louisiana Public Service
                                        Commission v. Entergy Services,
                                        Inc.
Docket No. EL08-51...................  Louisiana Public Service
                                        Commission v. Entergy Services,
                                        Inc.
Docket No. EL08-60...................  Ameren Services Co. v. Entergy
                                        Services, Inc.
Docket No. EL09-43...................  Arkansas Public Service
                                        Commission v. Entergy Services,
                                        Inc.
Docket No. EL09-50...................  Louisiana Public Service
                                        Commission v. Entergy Services,
                                        Inc.
Docket No. EL09-61...................  Louisiana Public Service
                                        Commission v. Entergy Services,
                                        Inc.
Docket No. EL10-55...................  Louisiana Public Service
                                        Commission v. Entergy Services,
                                        Inc.
Docket No. EL10-65...................  Louisiana Public Service
                                        Commission v. Entergy Services,
                                        Inc.
Docket No. EL11-34...................  Midwest Independent System
                                        Transmission Operator, Inc.
Docket No. ER05-1065.................  Entergy Services, Inc.
Docket No. ER07-682..................  Entergy Services, Inc.
Docket No. ER07-956..................  Entergy Services, Inc.
Docket No. ER08-1056.................  Entergy Services, Inc.
Docket No. ER09-833..................  Entergy Services, Inc.
Docket No. ER09-1224.................  Entergy Services, Inc.
Docket No. ER10-794..................  Entergy Services, Inc.

Docket No. ER10-1350.................  Entergy Services, Inc.
Docket No. ER10-1676.................  Entergy Services, Inc.
Docket No. ER10-2748.................  Entergy Services, Inc.
Docket No. ER11-2131.................  Entergy Arkansas, Inc.
Docket No. ER11-2132.................  Entergy Gulf States, Louisiana,
                                        LLC
Docket No. ER11-2133.................  Entergy Gulf States, Louisiana,
                                        LLC
Docket No. ER11-2134.................  Entergy Mississippi, Inc.
Docket No. ER11-2135.................  Entergy New Orleans, Inc.
Docket No. ER11-2136.................  Entergy Texas, Inc.
Docket No. ER11-2161.................  Entergy Texas, Inc.
Docket No. ER11-2562.................  Entergy Gulf States, Louisiana,
                                        LLC
Docket No. ER11-3156.................  Entergy Arkansas, Inc.
Docket No. ER11-3157.................  Entergy Arkansas, Inc.
Docket No. ER11-3201.................  Entergy Services, Inc.
Docket No. ER11-3274.................  Entergy Arkansas, Inc.
Docket No. ER11-3341.................  Entergy Gulf States, Louisiana,
                                        LLC
------------------------------------------------------------------------

    These meetings are open to the public.
    For more information, contact Patrick Clarey, Office of Energy
Market Regulation, Federal Energy Regulatory Commission at (317) 249-
5937 or<EMAIL_ADDRESS>
    Dated: May 9, 2011.
Kimberly D. Bose,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2011-11756 Filed 5-12-11; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6717-01-P


Page 1 of 4 UNITED STATES ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY WASHINGTON D. C., 20460 OFFICE OF PREVENTION, PESTICIDES AND TOXIC SUBSTANCES August 2, 2005 MEMORANDUM Subject: Transmission of the Preliminary Cumulative Risk Assessment for the NMethyl Carbamate Pesticides for review by the FIFRA Scientific Advisory Panel.

To: Myrta Christian, Designated Federal Official FIFRA SAP Office of Science Coordination and Policy ( 7101C)

From: Dr. Anna B. Lowit and CAPT David J. Miller Office of Pesticide Programs, Health Effects Division ( 7509C)

Through: Dr. Tina Levine, Director Office of Pesticide Programs, Health Effects Division ( 7509C)

A meeting of the FIFRA SAP is scheduled for August 23 26, 2005. This meeting will focus on the Preliminary Cumulative Risk Assessment for the N Methyl Carbamate Pesticides. This memo provides a list of documents provided by EPA at this point. The charge and issue questions will be transmitted separately. Page 2 of 4 List of Documents Provided to the SAP ( as of August 2, 2005)

I. Preliminary N Methyl Carbamate Cumulative Risk Assessment II. Appendices A. Introduction ( None) B. Hazard 1. Spreadsheet of RBC and whole/ half brain AChE data ( means, standard deviations) used in the Preliminary Cumulative Risk Assessment of the N methyl carbamate pesticides a. Agg Data b. Padilla Data 2. Dose response modeling of rat RBC and brain AChE for the Preliminary Cumulative Risk Assessment of the N methyl carbamate pesticides a. Dose Time Response Modeling of Rat Brain AChE Activity: Aldicarb Gavage Dosing b. Dose Time Response Modeling of Rat RBC AChE Activity: Aldicarb Gavage Dosing c. Dose Time Response Modeling of Rat Brain AChE Activity: Carbaryl Dermal Exposure d. Dose Time Response Modeling of Rat RBC AChE Activity: Carbaryl Dermal Dosing e. Dose Time Response Modeling of Rat Brain AChE Activity: Carbaryl Gavage Dosing f. Dose Time Response Modeling of Rat RBC AChE Activity: Carbaryl Gavage Dosing g. Dose Time Response Modeling of Rat Brain AChE Activity: Carbofuran Gavage Dosing h. Dose Time Response Modeling of Rat RBC AChE Activity: Carbofuran Gavage Dosing i. Dose Time Response Modeling of Rat Brain AChE Activity: Formetanate Gavage Dosing j. Dose Time Response Modeling of Rat RBC AChE Activity: Formetanate Gavage Dosing k. Dose Time Response Modeling of Rabbit Brain AChE Activity: Methiocarb Dermal Dosing l. Dose Time Response Modeling of Rabbit RBC AChE Activity: Methiocarb Dermal Dosing m. Dose Time Response Modeling of Rat Brain AChE Activity: Methiocarb Gavage Dosing n. Dose Time Response Modeling of Rat RBC AChE Activity: Methiocarb Gavage Dosing Page 3 of 4 o. Dose Time Response Modeling of Rat Brain AChE Activity: Methomyl Gavage Dosing p. Dose Time Response Modeling of Rat RBC AChE Activity: Methomyl Gavage Dosing q. Dose Response Modeling of Rabbit Brain AChE Activity: Oxamyl Dermal Dosing r. Dose Response Modeling of Rabbit RBC AChE Activity: Oxamyl Dermal Dosing s. Dose Response Modeling of Rat Brain AChE Activity: Oxamyl Inhalation Exposure t. Dose Response Modeling of Rat RBC AChE Activity: Oxamyl Inhalation Exposure u. Dose Time Response Modeling of Rat Brain AChE Activity: Oxamyl Gavage Dosing v. Dose Time Response Modeling of Rat RBC AChE Activity: Oxamyl Gavage Dosing w. Dose Time Response Modeling of Rat Brain AChE Activity: Primicarb Gavage Dosing x. Dose Time Response Modeling of Rat RBC AChE Activity: Pirimicarb Gavage Dosing y. Dose Time Response Modeling of Rabbit Brain AChE Activity: Propoxur Dermal Dosing z. Dose Time Response Modeling of Rabbit RBC AChE Activity: Propoxur Dermal Dosing aa. Dose Time Response Modeling of Rat Brain AChE Activity: Propoxur Inhalation Exposure bb. Dose Time Response Modeling of Rat RBC AChE Activity: Propoxur Inhalation Exposure cc. Dose Time Response Modeling of Rat Brain AChE Activity: Propoxur Gavage Dosing dd. Dose Time Response Modeling of Rat RBC AChE Activity: Propoxur Gavage Dosing ee. Dose Time Response Modeling of Rat Brain AChE Activity: Thiodicarb Gavage Dosing ff. Dose Time Response Modeling of Rat RBC AChE Activity: Thiodicarb Gavage Dosing 3. N M CarbamateDoseResponse ( computer code, zip file) 4. R packages ( computer code, zip file) 5. Summary of AChE protocol evaluations, mixture experiments, motor activity measurements 6. Physiologically Based Pharmacokinetic Modeling for the N methyl carbamate cumulative risk assessment C. Dietary 1. Processing Factors Used in Cumulative Dietary Exposure Assessment D. Drinking Water Page 4 of 4 1. Summary of USGS NAWQA Monitoring for N Methyl Carbamates 2. Summary of State Monitoring for N Methyl Carbamates 3. Drinking Water Treatment Effects on N Methyl Carbamate Pesticides 4. N Methyl Carbamate Usage Estimates 5. Chemical Specific Fate and Transport Properties Used for the Water Exposure Models 6. N Methyl Carbamate Surface Water Exposure Assessment 7. N Methyl Carbamate Ground Water Exposure Assessment E. Residential 1. Residential Pesticide Use Inputs from REJV Survey Data 2. Residential Exposure Scenarios Appendix F. Cumulative Risk 1. Temporal Exposure Profile Plot for Florida Central Ridge Ground Water 2. Temporal Exposure Profile Plot for North Carolina Coastal Plain Ground Water 3. Temporal Exposure Profile Plot for North Carolina Coastal Plain Surface Water G. Model Comparison ( None) H. Risk Characterization ( None) I. Future Steps ( None) J. References ( None)


[Federal Register Volume 81, Number 209 (Friday, October 28, 2016)]
[Notices]
[Page 75053]
[FR Doc No: 2016-26109]

=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY

[ER-FRL-9029-8]

Environmental Impact Statements; Notice of Availability

    Responsible Agency: Office of Federal Activities, General
Information<PHONE_NUMBER> or http://www.epa.gov/nepa.
Weekly receipt of Environmental Impact Statements (EISs)
Filed 10/17/2016 Through 10/21/2016
Pursuant to 40 CFR 1506.9.

Notice

    Section 309(a) of the Clean Air Act requires that EPA make public
its comments on EISs issued by other Federal agencies. EPA's comment
letters on EISs are available at: http://www.epa.gov/compliance/nepa/eisdata.html.

EIS No. 20160246, Final, NMFS, FL, Amendment 37 to the Fishery
Management Plan for the Snapper-Grouper Fishery of the South Atlantic
Region, Modification to the Hogfish Fishery Management Unit, Fishing
Level Specifications for the Two South Atlantic Hogfish Stocks,
Rebuilding Plan for the Florida Keys/East Florida Stock, and
Establishment/Revision of Management Measures for Both Stocks, Review
Period Ends: 11/28/2016, Contact: Nikhil Mehta<PHONE_NUMBER>

EIS No. 20160247, Final, BLM, NV, 3 Bars Ecosystem and Landscape
Restoration Project, Review Period Ends: 11/28/2016, Contact: Todd
Erdody<PHONE_NUMBER>
EIS No. 20160248, Draft, VA, KY, Replacement Robley Rex VA Medical
Center, Comment Period Ends: 12/12/2016, Contact: Todd Sanders 224-610-
3872
EIS No. 20160249, Draft, USFS, OR, Government Camp--Cooper Spur Land
Exchange, Comment Period Ends: 01/26/2017, Contact: Michelle Lombardo
503-668-1796
EIS No. 20160250, Draft, NPS, NY, Fire Island Wilderness Breach
Management Plan, Comment Period Ends: 12/12/2016, Contact: Kaetlyn
Jackson<PHONE_NUMBER>
EIS No. 20160251, Final, OSM, TN, North Cumberland Wildlife Management
Area, Tennessee Lands Unsuitable for Mining Petition Evaluation
Document, Review Period Ends: 11/28/2016, Contact: Earl Bandy 865-545-
4103
EIS No. 20160252, Draft, NSF, PR, Arecibo Observatory, Comment Period
Ends: 12/12/2016, Contact: Elizabeth Pentecost<PHONE_NUMBER>
EIS No. 20160253, Draft, USACE, KS, Kansas River Commercial Sand and
Gravel Dredging, Comment Period Ends: 12/12/2016, Contact: Brian
Donahue<PHONE_NUMBER>
EIS No. 20160254, Final Supplement, USFWS, OH, Ballville Dam Project,
Review Period Ends: 11/28/2016, Contact: Jessica Hogrefe<PHONE_NUMBER>

Amended Notices

EIS No. 20160197, Draft, NOAA, HI, Heeia National Estuarine Research
Reserve, Comment Period Ends: 10/31/2016, Contact: Jean Tanimoto 808-
725-5253

    Revision to the FR Notice Published 09/02/2016; Correction to
Extended Comment Period from 10/30/2016 to 10/31/2016.
EIS No. 20160205, Draft Supplement, USACE, WV, Bluestone Dam Safety
Modification, Comment Period Ends: 11/23/2016, Contact: Rebecca A.
Rutherford<PHONE_NUMBER>

    Revision to FR Notice Published 09/09/2016; Extending Comment
Period from 10/24/2016 to 11/23/2016.

    Dated: October 25, 2016.
Dawn Roberts,
Management Analyst, NEPA Compliance Division, Office of Federal
Activities.
[FR Doc. 2016-26109 Filed 10-27-16; 8:45 am]
 BILLING CODE 6560-50-P


( B) If classified as serious or higher, the area is subject to RFP under section 182( c)( 2)( B) of the Act and shall submit no later than 3 years after designation for the 8 hour NAAQS an RFP SIP providing for an average of 3 percent per year of VOC and/ or NOx emissions reductions for ( 1) the 6 year period beginning January 1 of the year following the year used for the baseline emissions inventory; and ( 2) all remaining 3 year periods after the first 6 year period out to the area's attainment date. PREDECISIONAL DRAFT   DO NOT QUOTE, CITE OR DISTRIBUTE 8/ 12/ 05 576 ( iii) An area classified as moderate or higher that contains one or more areas, or portions of areas, for which EPA fully approved a 15 percent plan for the 1 hour NAAQS as well as areas for which EPA has not fully approved a 15 percent plan for the 1 hour NAAQS must meet either of the following requirements:

( A) The State shall meet the requirements of paragraph ( a)( 1)( i) of this section for the entire 8 hour nonattainment area; or ( B) The State shall treat the area as two parts, each with a separate RFP target as follows:

( 1) For the portion of the area without an approved 15 percent VOC RFP plan for the 1 hour standard,

the State shall establish a separate 15 percent VOC only target under paragraph ( a)( 1)( i)( A) of this section.

Emissions reductions to meet this requirement may come from anywhere within the 8 hour nonattainment area.

( 2) For the portion of the area with an approved 15 percent VOC plan for the 1 hour NAAQS, the State shall submit a SIP as required under paragraph ( a)( 1)( ii)( A)

of this section.

( 2) What restrictions apply on the creditability of emission control measures for the RFP plans required under PREDECISIONAL DRAFT   DO NOT QUOTE, CITE OR DISTRIBUTE 8/ 12/ 05 577 this section? Except as specifically provided in section 182( b)( 1)( C) and ( D) and section 182( c)( 2)( B) of the Act, all emissions reductions that occur after the baseline emissions inventory year are creditable for purposes of the RFP requirements in this section, provided the reductions meet the requirements for creditability, including the need to be enforceable, permanent, quantifiable and surplus, as described for purposes of State economic incentive programs in the requirements of section 51.493 of this part.

( b) What are the general requirements for RFP for an area subject to subpart 1 pursuant to section 51.902( b) or to certain moderate areas subject to subpart 2 as covered in paragraphs ( a)( 1)( ii)( A) and ( B) of this section?

( 1) An area subject to the RFP requirement of subpart 1 pursuant to section 51.902( b) or a moderate area subject to subpart 2 as covered in paragraphs ( a)( 1)( ii)( A) and ( B) of this section shall meet the RFP requirements of section 172( c)( 2) of the Act as provided in paragraph ( 2) of this section.

( 2) The State shall submit no later than 3 years following designation for the 8 hour NAAQS a SIP providing for RFP consistent with the following: PREDECISIONAL DRAFT   DO NOT QUOTE, CITE OR DISTRIBUTE 8/ 12/ 05 578 ( i) For each area with an attainment demonstration requesting an attainment date of 5 years or less after designation for the 8 hour NAAQS, the attainment demonstration SIP shall require that all emissions reductions needed for attainment be implemented by the beginning of the attainment year ozone season.

( ii) For each area with an attainment demonstration requesting an attainment date more than 5 years after designation for the 8 hour NAAQS, the attainment demonstration SIP   ( A) Shall provide for a 15 percent emission reduction from the baseline year within 6 years after the baseline year.

( B) May use either NOx or VOC emissions reductions ( or both) to achieve the 15 percent emission reduction requirement. Use of NOx emissions reductions must meet the criteria in section 182( c)( 2)( C) of the Act.

( C) For each subsequent 3 year period out to the attainment date, shall provide for an additional increment of progress no less than the amount of emissions reductions that would be roughly proportional to the time between the end of the first increment and the attainment date. PREDECISIONAL DRAFT   DO NOT QUOTE, CITE OR DISTRIBUTE 8/ 12/ 05 579 ( c) What method should a State use to calculate RFP targets?

In calculating RFP targets for the initial 6 year period and the subsequent 3 year periods pursuant to this section, the State shall use the methods consistent with the requirements of sections 182( b)( 1)( C) and ( D) and 182( c)( 2)( B) to properly account for the non creditable reductions.

( d) What is the baseline emissions inventory for RFP plans?

( 1) A baseline emissions inventory is required for the RFP plan required under this section.

( 2) The baseline emissions inventory shall be determined at the time of designation for the 8 hour NAAQS and shall be the emissions inventory for the most recent calendar year for which a complete inventory is required to be submitted to EPA under the provisions of subpart A of this part or a more recent alternative baseline emissions inventory provided the State demonstrates that the baseline inventory meets the CAA provisions for RFP and demonstrates why the inventory required under subpart A of this part would be impracticable to use.

* * * * *

51.912 What requirements apply for reasonably available control technology ( RACT) and reasonably available control measures ( RACM) under the 8 hour NAAQS? PREDECISIONAL DRAFT   DO NOT QUOTE, CITE OR DISTRIBUTE 8/ 12/ 05 580 ( a) What is the RACT requirement for areas subject to subpart 2 in accordance with section 51.903?

( 1) For each area subject to subpart 2 in accordance with section 51.903 of this part and classified moderate or higher, the State shall submit a SIP revision that meets the NOx and VOC RACT requirements in sections 182( b)( 2) and 182( f) of the Act.

( 2) The State shall submit the RACT SIP for each area no later than 27 months after designation for the 8 hour ozone NAAQS.

( 3) The State shall provide for implementation of RACT as expeditiously as practicable but no later than the first ozone season or portion thereof which occurs 30 months after the RACT SIP is due.

( b) How do the RACT provisions apply to areas required to submit a RACT SIPa major stationary source?

( 1) Volatile organic compounds and NOx are to be considered separately for purposes of determining whether a source is a major stationary source as defined in section 302 of the Act.

( 2) States may use current EPA guidance to assist in making RACT determinations and certifications that previously required RACT controls represent RACT for 8 hour PREDECISIONAL DRAFT   DO NOT QUOTE, CITE OR DISTRIBUTE 8/ 12/ 05 581 implementation purposes. As new or updated EPA RACT guidance becomes available, States shall consider the new information in their RACT determinations or certifications.

( c) What is the RACT requirement for areas subject only to subpart 1 pursuant to section 51.902( b)? Areas subject only to subpart 1 pursuant to section 51.902( b) are subject to the RACT requirement specified in section 172( c)( 1) of the Act.

( 1) For an area that submits an attainment demonstration that requests an attainment date 5 years or less after designation for the 8 hour NAAQS, the State shall meet the RACT requirement by submitting an attainment demonstration SIP demonstrating that the area has adopted all control measures necessary to demonstrate attainment as expeditiously as practicable.

( 2) For an area that submits an attainment demonstration that requests an attainment date more than 5 years after designation for the 8 hour NAAQS, the State shall submit a SIP consistent with the requirements of section 51.912( a) and ( b) except the State shall submit the RACT SIP for each area with its attainment date extension request.

( d) What is the Reasonably Available Control Measures ( RACM)

requirement for areas designated nonattainment for the 8 hour NAAQS? For each nonattainment area required to submit an PREDECISIONAL DRAFT   DO NOT QUOTE, CITE OR DISTRIBUTE 8/ 12/ 05 582 attainment demonstration under section 51.908, the State shall submit with the attainment demonstration a SIP revision demonstrating that it has adopted all RACM necessary to demonstrate attainment as expeditiously as practicable and to meet any RFP requirements.

Sec. 51.913 How do the section 182( f) NOx exemption provisions apply for the 8 hour NAAQS?

( a) A person may petition the Administrator for an exemption from NOx NSR and/ or RACT for any area designated nonattainment for the 8 hour ozone NAAQS and for any area in a section 184 ozone transport region.

( b) The petition must contain adequate documentation that the criteria in section 182( f) are met.

( c) A section 182( f) NOx exemption granted for the 1 hour ozone standard does not relieve the area from any requirements for the 8 hour ozone standard.

51.914 What new source review requirements apply for 8 hour ozone nonattainment areas?

The requirements for new source review for the 8 hour ozone standard are located in section 51.165 of this part.

Sec. 51.915 What emissions inventory requirements apply under the 8 hour NAAQS? PREDECISIONAL DRAFT   DO NOT QUOTE, CITE OR DISTRIBUTE 8/ 12/ 05 583 For each nonattainment area subject to subpart 2 in accordance with section 51.903, the emissions inventory requirements in sections 182( a)( 1) and 182( a)( 3) of the Act shall apply, and such SIP shall be due no later 2 years after designation. For each nonattainment area subject only to subpart 1 in accordance with section 51.902( b), the emissions inventory requirement in section 172( c)( 3) of the Act shall apply, and an emission inventory SIP shall be due no later 3 years after designation. For purposes of meetingdefining the data elements for the emissions inventory requirements of the Acties for these areas, the ozone relevant data element requirements under 40 CFR 51 subpart A apply. The State may submit the emission inventory developed under subpart A of this part as part of its SIP. However, the State may also submit an updated version of the EI for purposes of CAA sections 182( a)( 1), 182( a)( 3), and 172( c)( 3).

51.916 What are the requirements for an Ozone Transport Region under the 8 hour NAAQS?

( a) In General. Sections 176A and 184 of the Act apply for purposes of the 8 hour NAAQS.

( b) RACT Requirements for Certain Portions of an Ozone Transport Region. The State must submit a SIP revision that meets the RACT requirements of section 184 of the Act for PREDECISIONAL DRAFT   DO NOT QUOTE, CITE OR DISTRIBUTE 8/ 12/ 05 584 each area designated as attainment or unclassifiable, or that may be classified as marginal, or that is covered under section 51.904 of this subpart, but which is located in an ozone transport region. A major stationary source for purposes of this paragraph is defined as a source which directly emits, or has the potential to emit, 100 tons per year or more of NOx or 50 tons per year or more of VOC. The State shallis required to submit the RACT revision no later than 27 months after the effective date of the nonattainment designation of any area in the OTR for the 8 hour NAAQS and shallSeptember 16, 2006 and must provide for implementation of RACT as expeditiously as practicable but no later than the first ozone season or portion thereof that occurs 30 months after the RACT SIP is dueMay 1, 2009.

51.917 What is the effective date of designation for the Las Vegas, NV, 8 hour ozone nonattainment area?

The Las Vegas, NV, 8 hour ozone nonattainment area ( designated on September 17, 2004 ( 69 FR 55956) shall be treated as having an effective date of designation of June 15, 2004, for purposes of calculating SIP submission deadlines and attainment dates under this subpart.

PART 52  [ Amended] PREDECISIONAL DRAFT   DO NOT QUOTE, CITE OR DISTRIBUTE 8/ 12/ 05 585 1. The authority citation for part 52 continues to read as follows:

Authority: 42 U. S. C. 7401, et seq.

Subpart A  [ Amended]

2. Section 52.21 is amended by:

a. Revising paragraph ( b)( 1)( ii).

b. Revising paragraph ( b)( 2)( ii).

c. Revising paragraph ( b)( 23)( i).

d. Revising paragraph ( b)( 50).

e. By revising the second sentence of footnote 1 to paragraph ( i)( 5)( i)( e) to state: However, any net emissions increase of 100 tons per year or more of volatile organic compounds or nitrogen oxides subject to PSD would be required to perform an ambient impact analysis, including the gathering of ambient air quality data.

The revisions read as follows:

( b) * * *

( 1) * * *

( ii) A major source that is major for volatile organic compounds or NOx shall be considered major for ozone.

* * * * *

( 2) * * * PREDECISIONAL DRAFT   DO NOT QUOTE, CITE OR DISTRIBUTE 8/ 12/ 05 586 ( ii) Any significant emissions increase ( as defined at paragraph ( b)( 40) of this section) from any emissions units or net emissions increase ( as defined in paragraph ( b)( 3) of this section) at a major stationary source that is significant for volatile organic compounds or NOx shall be considered significant for ozone.

( 23)

( i) * * *

Pollutant and Emissions Rate * * *

Ozone: 40 tpy of volatile organic compounds or NOx * * * * *

( 50) * * *

( i) Any pollutant for which a national ambient air quality standard has been promulgated and any constituents or precursors for such pollutants identified by the Administrator ( e. g., volatile organic compounds and NOx are precursors for ozone);

3. Section 52.24 is revised to read as follows:

§ 52.24 Statutory restriction on new sources.

( a) Any area designated nonattainment pursuant to section 107( d) of the Act to which, immediately prior to the enactment of the Amendments to the Act of 1990 ( November 15,

1990), a prohibition of construction or modification of major PREDECISIONAL DRAFT   DO NOT QUOTE, CITE OR DISTRIBUTE 8/ 12/ 05 587 stationary sources was applied, shall retain that prohibition if such prohibition was applied by virtue of a finding of the Administrator that the State containing such an area:

( 1) Failed to submit an implementation plan meeting the requirements of an approvable new source review permitting program; or ( 2) Failed to submit an implementation plan that provided for timely attainment of the national ambient air quality standard for sulfur dioxide by December 31, 1982.

This prohibition shall apply until the Administrator approves a plan for such area as meeting the applicable requirements of part D of title I of the Act as amended ( NSR permitting requirements) or subpart 5 of part D of title I of the Act as amended ( relating to attainment of the national ambient air quality standards for sulfur dioxide), as applicable.

( b) Permits to construct and operate as required by permit programs under section 172( c)( 5) of the Act may not be issued for new or modified major stationary sources proposing to locate in nonattainment areas or areas in a transport region where the Administrator has determined that the applicable implementation plan is not being adequately implemented for the nonattainment area or transport region in which the proposed source is to be constructed or modified in PREDECISIONAL DRAFT   DO NOT QUOTE, CITE OR DISTRIBUTE 8/ 12/ 05 588 accordance with the requirements of part D of title I of the Act.

( c) Whenever, on the basis of any information, the Administrator finds that a State is not in compliance with any requirement or prohibition of the Act relating to the construction of new sources or the modification of existing sources, the Administrator may issue an order under section 113( a)( 5) of the Act prohibiting the construction or modification of any major stationary source in any area to which such requirement applies.

( d) The restrictions in paragraphs ( a) and ( b) of this section apply only to major stationary sources of emissions that cause or contribute to concentrations of the pollutant ( or precursors, as applicable) for which the transport region or nonattainment area was designated such, and for which the applicable implementation plan is not being carried out in accordance with, or does not meet, the requirements of part D of title I of the Act.

( e) For any transport region or any area designated as nonattainment for any national ambient air quality standard,

the restrictions in paragraphs ( a) and ( b) of this section shall apply to any major stationary source or major modification that would be major for the pollutant ( or precursors, where applicable) for which the area is PREDECISIONAL DRAFT   DO NOT QUOTE, CITE OR DISTRIBUTE 8/ 12/ 05 589 designated nonattainment or a transport region, if the stationary source or major modification would be constructed anywhere in the designated nonattainment area or transport region.

( f) The provisions in § 51.165 of this chapter shall apply in interpreting the terms under this section.

( g) At such time that a particular source or modification becomes a major stationary source or major modification solely by virtue of a relaxation in any enforceable limitation which was established after August 7,

1980, on the capacity of the source or modification otherwise to emit a pollutant, such as a restriction on hours of operation, then:

( 1) If the construction moratorium imposed pursuant to this section is still in effect for the nonattainment area or transport region in which the source or modification is located, then the permit may not be so revised; or ( 2) If the construction moratorium is no longer in effect in that area, then the requirements of § 51.165 of this chapter shall apply to the source or modification as though construction had not yet commenced on the source or modification.

( h) This section does not apply to major stationary sources or major modifications locating in a clearly defined PREDECISIONAL DRAFT   DO NOT QUOTE, CITE OR DISTRIBUTE 8/ 12/ 05 590 part of a nonattainment area or transport region ( such as a political subdivision of a State), where EPA finds that a plan which meets the requirements of part D of title I of the Act is in effect and is being implemented in that part.

( i) [ Reserved]

( j) [ Reserved]

( k) For an area designated as nonattainment after July 1, 1979, the Emission Offset Interpretative Ruling, 40 CFR part 51, appendix S shall govern permits to construct and operate applied for during the period between the date of designation as nonattainment and the date the NSR permit program meeting the requirements of part D is approved. The Emission Offset Interpretative Ruling, 40 CFR part 51,

Appendix S, shall also govern permits to construct and operate applied for in any area designated under section 107( d) of the CAA as attainment or unclassifiable for ozone that is located in an ozone transport region prior to the date the NSR permitting program meeting the requirements of part D is approved.

PART 80  [ Amended]

1. The authority citation for part 80 continues to read as follows:

Authority: 42 U. S. C. 7414, 7545, and 7601( a).

Subpart D  [ Amended] PREDECISIONAL DRAFT   DO NOT QUOTE, CITE OR DISTRIBUTE 8/ 12/ 05 2. Section 80.70( m) is amended by:

a. In the second sentence, striking " included in" and replacing it with " identified pursuant to".

b. In the third sentence, striking " listed in" and replacing it with " identified pursuant to".

c. Striking all text after the third sentence, and replacing it with the following:

( 1) An area identified as a covered area pursuant to this paragraph ( m), whose classification as a severe nonattainment area under the 1 hour ozone NAAQS is removed as a result of removal of the 1 hour ozone NAAQS, remains a covered area as follows:

( I) prior to redesignation as attainment for the 8 hour ozone NAAQS the area remains a covered area;

( ii) after redesignation as attainment for the 8 hour ozone NAAQS  [ RESERVED].

( 2) An area identified as a covered area pursuant to this paragraph ( m), whose classification as a severe nonattainment area under the 1 hour ozone NAAQS is removed as a result of redesignation to attainment for the 1 hour ozone NAAQS, remains a covered area as follows: [ RESERVED]


[Federal Register Volume 81, Number 226 (Wednesday, November 23, 2016)]
[Notices]
[Pages 84567-84568]
[FR Doc No: 2016-28159]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission

[Docket No. ER17-252-000]

2016 ESA Project Company, LLC; Supplemental Notice That Initial
Market-Based Rate Filing Includes Request for Blanket Section 204
Authorization

    This is a supplemental notice in the above-referenced proceeding
2016 ESA Project Company, LLC`s application for market-based rate
authority, with an accompanying rate tariff, noting that such
application includes a request for blanket authorization, under 18 CFR
part 34, of future issuances of securities and assumptions of
liability.
    Any person desiring to intervene or to protest should file with the
Federal Energy Regulatory Commission, 888 First Street NE., Washington,
DC 20426, in accordance with Rules 211 and 214 of the Commission's
Rules of Practice and Procedure (18 CFR 385.211 and 385.214). Anyone
filing a motion to intervene or protest must serve a copy of that
document on the Applicant.
    Notice is hereby given that the deadline for filing protests with
regard to the applicant's request for blanket authorization, under 18
CFR part 34, of future issuances of securities and assumptions of
liability, is December 5, 2016.
    The Commission encourages electronic submission of protests and
interventions in lieu of paper, using the FERC Online links at http://www.ferc.gov. To facilitate electronic service, persons with Internet
access who will eFile a document and/or be listed as a contact for an
intervenor must create and validate an eRegistration account using the
eRegistration link. Select the eFiling link to log on and submit the
intervention or protests.
    Persons unable to file electronically should submit an original and
5 copies of the intervention or protest to the Federal Energy
Regulatory Commission, 888 First Street NE., Washington, DC 20426.

    The filings in the above-referenced proceeding are accessible in
the Commission's eLibrary system by clicking on the appropriate link in
the above list. They are also available for electronic review in the
Commission's Public Reference Room in Washington, DC. There is an
eSubscription link on the Web site that enables subscribers to receive
email notification when a document is added to a subscribed docket(s).
For assistance with any FERC Online service, please email
<EMAIL_ADDRESS>or call<PHONE_NUMBER> (toll free). For
TTY, call<PHONE_NUMBER>.

    Dated: November 15, 2016.
Kimberly D. Bose,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2016-28159 Filed 11-22-16; 8:45 am]
 BILLING CODE 6717-01-P