[Federal Register Volume 84, Number 99 (Wednesday, May 22, 2019)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Pages 23461-23468]
[FR Doc No: 2019-10653]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION

Federal Aviation Administration

14 CFR Part 39

[Docket No. FAA-2018-0795; Product Identifier 2018-NM-076-AD; Amendment
39-19628; AD 2019-08-07]
RIN 2120-AA64

Airworthiness Directives; Airbus SAS Airplanes

AGENCY: Federal Aviation Administration (FAA), Department of
Transportation (DOT).

ACTION: Final rule.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: We are superseding Airworthiness Directive (AD) 2014-20-04,
which applied to all Airbus SAS Model A318 and A319 series airplanes;
Airbus SAS Model A320-111, -211, -212, -214, -231, -232, and -233
airplanes; and Airbus SAS Model A321-111, -112, -131, -211, -212, -213,
-231, and -232 airplanes. AD 2014-20-04 required repetitive inspections
of the titanium angles between the belly fairing and the keel beam side
panel, an inspection of the open holes of cracked titanium angles, and
corrective action if necessary. This AD continues to require those
actions, adds Model A320-216 airplanes, and requires a detailed
inspection for, and replacement of, certain rivets, and corrective
actions if necessary. This AD was prompted by reports of cracks at the
lower riveting of the four titanium angles that connect the belly
fairing to the keel beam side

panels. We are issuing this AD to address the unsafe condition on these
products.

DATES: This AD is effective June 26, 2019.
    The Director of the Federal Register approved the incorporation by
reference of certain publications listed in this AD as of June 26,
2019.
    The Director of the Federal Register approved the incorporation by
reference of a certain other publication listed in this AD as of
November 7, 2014 (79 FR 59636, October 3, 2014).

ADDRESSES: For service information identified in this final rule,
contact Airbus SAS, Airworthiness Office--EIAS, Rond-Point Emile
Dewoitine No: 2, 31700 Blagnac Cedex, France; phone: +33 5 61 93 36 96;
fax: +33 5 61 93 44 51; email<EMAIL_ADDRESS>
internet: http://www.airbus.com. You may view this referenced service
information at the FAA, Transport Standards Branch, 2200 South 216th
St., Des Moines, WA. For information on the availability of this
material at the FAA, call<PHONE_NUMBER>. It is also available on the
internet at http://www.regulations.gov by searching for and locating
Docket No. FAA-2018-0795.

Examining the AD Docket

    You may examine the AD docket on the internet at http://www.regulations.gov by searching for and locating Docket No. FAA-2018-
0795; or in person at Docket Operations between 9 a.m. and 5 p.m.,
Monday through Friday, except Federal holidays. The AD docket contains
this final rule, the regulatory evaluation, any comments received, and
other information. The address for Docket Operations (phone: 800-647-
5527) is U.S. Department of Transportation, Docket Operations, M-30,
West Building Ground Floor, Room W12-140, 1200 New Jersey Avenue SE,
Washington, DC 20590.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Sanjay Ralhan, Aerospace Engineer,
International Section, Transport Standards Branch, FAA, 2200 South
216th St., Des Moines, WA 98198; phone and fax:<PHONE_NUMBER>.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

Discussion

    We issued a notice of proposed rulemaking (NPRM) to amend 14 CFR
part 39 to supersede AD 2014-20-04, Amendment 39-17977 (79 FR 59636,
October 3, 2014) (``AD 2014-20-04''). AD 2014-20-04 applied to all
Airbus SAS Model A318 series airplanes; Airbus SAS Model A319 series
airplanes; Airbus SAS Model A320-111, -211, -212, -214, -231, -232, and
-233 airplanes; and Airbus SAS Model A321-111, -112, -131, -211, -212,
-213, -231, and -232 airplanes. The NPRM published in the Federal
Register on September 17, 2018 (83 FR 46905). The NPRM was prompted by
our determination that additional work is necessary for certain
airplanes. The NPRM proposed to continue to require repetitive
inspections for cracking of the four titanium angles between the belly
fairing and the keel beam side panel, an inspection for cracking of the
open holes if any cracking is found in the titanium angles, and repair
or replacement if necessary. The NPRM also proposed to revise the
applicability by adding Model A320-216 airplanes. The NPRM also
proposed additional work, including a detailed inspection for, and
replacement of, certain rivets (including a rotating probe test for
cracks in the open holes), and corrective actions if necessary. We are
issuing this AD to address cracking at the lower riveting of the four
titanium angles that connect the belly fairing to the keel beam side
panels on both sides of the fuselage, which could affect the structural
integrity of the airplane.
    The European Aviation Safety Agency (EASA), which is the Technical
Agent for the Member States of the European Union, has issued EASA AD
2018-0091, dated April 20, 2018 (referred to after this as the
Mandatory Continuing Airworthiness Information, or ``the MCAI''), to
correct an unsafe condition for all Airbus SAS Model A318 series
airplanes; Airbus SAS Model A319 series airplanes; Airbus SAS Model
A320-211, -212, -214, -216, -231, -232, and -233 airplanes; and Airbus
SAS Model A321-111, -112, -131, -211, -212, -213, -231, and -232
airplanes. The MCAI states:

    During the fatigue test campaign of the A320 family type design,
cracks were found at the lower riveting of the four titanium angles
which connect the belly fairing to the keel beam side panels between
frames FR40 and FR42, on both sides of the fuselage.
    This condition, if not detected and corrected, could affect the
structural integrity of the aeroplane.
    To address this potential unsafe condition, Airbus issued
Service Bulletin (SB) A320-53-1014, and DGAC [Direction
G[eacute]n[eacute]rale de l'Aviation Civile] France issued AD 92-
201-030 [which corresponds to FAA AD 94-12-03, Amendment 39-8930 (59
FR 28763, June 3, 1994) (``AD 94-12-03'')] to require reinforcement
of the belly fairing structure.
    Following new investigation which showed that these measures
addressed only part of the unsafe condition, Airbus published SB
A320-53-1259 and EASA issued AD 2013-0122 [which corresponds to FAA
AD 2014-20-04], retaining the requirements of DGAC France AD 92-201-
030, which was superseded, and requiring repetitive detailed
inspections (DET) of the affected titanium angles and, depending on
findings, repair or replacement of parts.
    After that [EASA] AD was issued, Airbus published Revision
(Rev.) 01 and Rev. 02 of SB A320-53-1259. [Airbus SB A320-53-1259]
Rev. 02 provided incorrect instructions to use Part Number (P/N)
EN6081D4 rivets for the titanium angles installation, instead of P/N
EN6081D5 rivets. Consequently, Airbus SB A320-53-1259 was updated
(now at Rev. 03) including reference to the proper rivets.
    For the reason described above, this [EASA] AD retains the
requirements of EASA AD 2013-0122, which is superseded, and requires
additional work [a detailed inspection for and replacement of
certain rivets, and applicable corrective actions] for aeroplanes on
which Airbus SB A320-53-1259 at Rev. 02 was embodied.

    You may examine the MCAI in the AD docket on the internet at http://www.regulations.gov by searching for and locating Docket No. FAA-2018-
0795.

Comments

    We gave the public the opportunity to participate in developing
this final rule. The following presents the comments received on the
NPRM and the FAA's response to each comment.

Request To Withdraw the NPRM

    Delta Air Lines (DAL) requested that we re-issue the NPRM using the
method where the FAA AD would mandate the EASA AD for compliance (i.e.,
the ``incorporate by reference (IBR) the MCAI'' method). DAL pointed
out this method would simplify the understanding of the NPRM and reduce
the number of conflicts between the EASA AD and the NPRM.
    We acknowledge the commenter's request to use the ``IBR the MCAI''
method. Using the ``IBR the MCAI'' method simplifies FAA ADs and
facilitates a simpler AD process. However, we disagree with the request
to re-issue the NPRM using this method, as it would require an
additional public comment period and unnecessarily delay issuance of
this final rule, which is necessary to address the identified unsafe
condition. However, based on positive feedback from operators, we are
expanding the use of the ``IBR the MCAI'' method, and additional NPRMs
and ADs are currently being drafted using this method.

Request To Use Previously Existing Alternative Method of Compliance
(AMOC) for Compliance With This AD

    DAL requested that we allow the use of AMOC ANM-116-15-018 for
compliance with all corresponding

provisions of the proposed AD. DAL also requested that if the FAA
disagrees to include the use of the AMOC as requested, that we include
details in the NPRM for addressing the airplanes already inspected and
modified using the AMOC and Airbus Service Bulletin A320-53-1259,
Revision 01, dated November 26, 2013. DAL mentioned that several
airplanes from the DAL fleet were inspected and modified using the AMOC
and Airbus Service Bulletin A320-53-1259, Revision 01, dated November
26, 2013. DAL also pointed out that the NPRM does not provide credit
for work performed using the AMOC and Airbus Service Bulletin A320-53-
1259, Revision 01, dated November 26, 2013.
    We agree to allow the use of the AMOC identified by the commenter,
as well as all other AMOCs to AD 2014-20-04, and we have added
paragraph (r)(1)(ii) to this AD accordingly.

Request To Use All Revisions of the Service Information for Inspection
Compliance in Paragraph (h) of the Proposed AD

    DAL requested that we include Airbus Service Bulletin A320-53-1259,
Revision 01, dated November 26, 2013, and Airbus Service Bulletin A320-
53-1259, Revision 02, dated March 24, 2016, as service information for
the inspection requirements of the proposed AD. DAL pointed out that
the removal and installation of the titanium angles is the main concern
in limiting the use of Airbus Service Bulletin A320-53-1259, Revision
02, dated March 24, 2016, but that the inspection requirements contain
no errors. DAL also indicated concurrence with the requirement to use
Airbus Service Bulletin A320-53-1259, Revision 03, dated November 30,
2017, after the effective date of the final rule.
    We agree for the reasons provided by the commenter and have revised
the introductory text of paragraph (h) and paragraphs (h)(2) and (k) of
this AD accordingly. However, we have only revised paragraphs (i)(2),
(j), and (l) of this AD to include Airbus Service Bulletin A320-53-
1259, Revision 01, dated November 26, 2013, because those paragraphs
include installation requirements and Revision 02 of Airbus Service
Bulletin A320-53-1259 is not acceptable service information for doing
those installations.

Request To Use Alternative Part Number Titanium Angles

    United Air Lines (UAL) requested that we allow titanium angle part
numbers D5337060121295 and D5337060121495 to be installed instead of
part numbers D5337060121200 and D5337060121400, respectively. UAL
stated that titanium angle part numbers D5337060121200 and
D5337060121400 as specified by Airbus Service Bulletin A320-53-1259,
Revision 03, dated November 30, 2017, are not procurable. UAL mentioned
that Airbus indicated to UAL that titanium angle part numbers
D5337060121295 and D5337060121495 are acceptable for installation for
Airbus Service Bulletin A320-53-1259, Revision 03, dated November 30,
2017.
    We agree with the commenter for the reasons provided. We have added
paragraph (q) to this AD to allow the installation of titanium angle
part numbers D5337060121295 and D5337060121495. We have redesignated
subsequent paragraphs accordingly.

Request To Revise the Affected Airplanes for Paragraph (o) of the
Proposed AD

    DAL and UAL requested that we revise the affected airplanes for
paragraph (o) of the proposed AD. UAL requested that we clarify the
service information reference for description of the affected airplanes
in paragraph (o) of the proposed AD. DAL and UAL pointed out that the
MCAI specifies Revision 02 of Airbus Service Bulletin A320-23-1259 for
the action specified in paragraph (o) of the proposed AD and that
paragraph (o) of the proposed AD specifies Airbus Service Bulletin
A320-53-1259, dated November 6, 2012, for identifying affected
airplanes.
    In addition, DAL requested that we revise paragraph (o) of the
proposed AD to apply only to airplanes which had titanium angles
removed and replaced in accordance with sub-task 531259-203-001 of
Airbus Service Bulletin A320-53-1259, Revision 02, dated March 24,
2016. DAL pointed out that paragraph (o) of the proposed AD specified
airplanes which were inspected using Airbus Service Bulletin A320-53-
1259, dated November 6, 2012. DAL mentioned that the unsafe condition
was introduced in Airbus Service Bulletin A320-53-1259, Revision 02,
dated March 24, 2016, and that there are no airworthiness concerns with
the inspections (only replacements) accomplished under any revision of
the service information.
    We agree that paragraph (o) of this AD should refer to Airbus
Service Bulletin A320-53-1259, Revision 02, dated March 24, 2016, to
identify the affected airplanes as specified in the MCAI, and we have
revised paragraph (o) of this AD accordingly.
    We also agree with the request to limit the affected airplanes to
those that had titanium angles replaced in accordance with sub-task
531259-203-001 of Airbus Service Bulletin A320-53-1259, Revision 02,
dated March 24, 2016. However, we have determined that the phrase
``modified (replacement of affected titanium angles),'' which matches
the intent of the language in the MCAI, is more appropriate instead of
listing specific sub-tasks for replacement. Operators may have
installed these rivets in accordance with instructions approved by
Airbus SAS under EASA's Design Organization Approval (DOA) outside of
the service information sub-task. Therefore, we have not changed this
AD further in this regard.

Request for Clarification of Paragraph (k) of the Proposed AD

    UAL requested clarification of the intent of paragraph (k) of the
proposed AD. UAL specified that the intent should be a detailed
inspection of the ``replaced'' titanium angles and not an inspection of
the four titanium angles. UAL explained that paragraph (j) of the
proposed AD states to remove the affected [cracked] titanium angle(s),
and the next inspection per paragraph (k) of the proposed AD would
apply to the replaced titanium angles, not necessarily all four
titanium angles.
    We agree for the reasons provided by the commenter, and we have
revised paragraph (k) of this AD accordingly.

Request To Include Additional Data To Correct an Error in the Service
Information

    UAL requested that we include information to correct an error in
the service information. UAL stated that figure A-GCAAA Sheet 02 of
Airbus Service Bulletin A320-53-1259, Revision 03, dated November 30,
2017, shows views A-A and B-B in reversed left and right direction and
that view B-B is missing one rivet location. UAL also stated that this
error makes it possible to install incorrect rivets during angle
replacement. UAL mentioned that it had contacted Airbus about this
error, and that Airbus published Technical Adaptation 80491184/005/2018
to temporarily correct the error. UAL also mentioned that Airbus plans
to revise Service Bulletin A320-53-1259 to correct this error.
    We agree with the commenter's request for the reasons provided. To
ensure operators refer to the correct views and rivet locations, we
have revised this AD by referencing Airbus Technical Adaptation
80491184/005/2018, Issue 1, dated February 08, 2018, in lieu of Figure
A GCAAA--Sheet 02 of Airbus Service Bulletin A320-53-1259, Revision 03,
dated November 30, 2017, wherever it is appropriate.

Request To Verify the Required Service Information Prior to AD
Publication

    UAL requested that we verify the latest revision of Service
Bulletin A320-53-1259 is referenced in this AD prior to final
publication. UAL indicated its preference not to request an AMOC
allowing use of a later revision of the service information immediately
after AD publication.
    We agree and have confirmed that Airbus Service Bulletin A320-53-
1259, Revision 03, dated November 30, 2017, is the latest version of
the service information. We have not changed this AD in this regard.

Request To Expand the Airplanes Specified in Paragraph (o) of the
Proposed AD

    UAL requested that we expand the airplanes specified in paragraph
(o) of the proposed AD to include all angles that were replaced using
any service information issued prior to Airbus Service Bulletin A320-
53-1259, Revision 03, dated November 30, 2017, unless maintenance
records show that the correct rivets were previously installed. UAL
pointed out that revisions issued prior to Airbus Service Bulletin
A320-53-1259, Revision 02, dated March 24, 2016, did not specify any
procedures to install rivets to the keel beam side panel. UAL mentioned
that it could then be possible that an angle replacement done
previously using Airbus Service Bulletin A320-53-1259, dated November
6, 2012, or Airbus Service Bulletin A320-53-1259, Revision 01, dated
November 26, 2013, might have missing or incorrect rivets installed.
    We disagree with the request to expand the affected airplanes
specified in paragraph (o) of this AD. As discussed previously, we have
clarified that the affected airplanes specified in paragraph (o) of
this AD are those on which a modification (replacement of affected
titanium angles) was done in accordance with Airbus Service Bulletin
A320-53-1259, Revision 02, dated March 24, 2016, and not airplanes on
which an inspection was done. Additionally, we have not received any
information from either EASA or Airbus regarding expanding the scope of
the potential unsafe condition. The new requirements in this AD are a
result of incorrect dimensions of the rivet part number provided in
Airbus Service Bulletin A320-53-1259, Revision 02, dated March 24,
2016. No such information was provided by Airbus in the previous
revisions of the service information. We have not changed this AD in
this regard.

Request for Clarification of Paragraph (o) of the Proposed AD

    DAL requested that, to reduce confusion, we include clarification
in paragraph (o) of the proposed AD, that EN6081D5 rivets only need to
be installed in the fastener holes common to the titanium angle and
belly fairing wall joint. DAL mentioned that paragraph (o) of the
proposed AD provides relief for the on-wing inspection if it can be
determined no titanium angles were installed in accordance with Airbus
Service Bulletin A320-53-1259, Revision 02, dated March 24, 2016, or if
only EN6081D5 rivets were used to install the titanium angles on that
airplane. DAL pointed out that the titanium angles are installed using
both hi-lok fasteners as well as rivets. DAL also indicated that the
hi-lok fasteners are common to the keel beam panel and the rivets are
common to the belly fairing walls.
    We agree to clarify. The service information provides specific
information for a detailed inspection for the rivets on the titanium
angles and belly fairing shear wall attachments between frames (FR)40
and FR42. Additionally, as specified previously, Airbus has issued
Airbus Technical Adaptation 80491184/005/2018, Issue 1, dated February
08, 2018, as an exception to Figure A GCAAA--Sheet 02 of Airbus Service
Bulletin A320-53-1259, Revision 03, dated November 30, 2017, which we
have included in this AD. Therefore, in paragraph (o) of this AD, where
it specifies ``or if only EN6081D5 rivets were used to install the
titanium angles on that airplane,'' the installation location for
rivets is on the titanium angles and belly fairing shear wall
attachments as identified in the service information. Since the service
information provides this information, we have not changed this AD
further regarding this issue.

Request To Use Additional Guidance for Correct Fasteners

    DAL requested that we include additional guidance for accomplishing
the titanium angle replacement. DAL stated that Airbus issued Operator
Information Telex (OIT) 16-0032, Rev. 00, dated June 3, 2016, that
specified the required rivets to use for the replacement. DAL also
mentioned that Airbus issued Technical Adaptation 80170642/022/2017,
dated April 7, 2017, to Airbus Service Bulletin A320-53-1259, Revision
02, dated March 24, 2016, which specified the correct rivets for the
replacement. DAL added that the FAA could provide credit for airplanes
on which the correct rivets were installed using the OIT or technical
adaptation.
    We disagree with the request. Paragraph (p)(2) of this AD refers to
Airbus Service Bulletin A320-53-1259, Revision 03, dated November 30,
2017, and Airbus Technical Adaptation 80491184/005/2018, Issue 1, dated
February 08, 2018, which provide adequate service information for
completing the replacement required if any part number EN6081D4 series
rivet is found during any inspection required by paragraph (o) of this
AD. This AD corresponds to EASA AD 2018-0091, dated April 20, 2018,
which does not permit Airbus OIT 16-0032, Rev. 00, dated June 3, 2016,
and Airbus Technical Adaptation 80170642/022/2017, dated April 7, 2017,
as methods of compliance. We agree that those documents are not
acceptable methods of compliance with this AD because those documents
only specify the part numbers as well as the location and quantity of
the parts.
    However, we do agree to clarify the statement in paragraph (o) of
this AD that describes a method of compliance for the actions required
by paragraph (o) of this AD. Paragraph (o) of this AD provides relief
for airplanes on which ``it can be determined that no titanium angles
have been installed on that airplane in accordance with the
Accomplishment Instructions of Revision 02 of Airbus Service Bulletin
A320-53-1259, or if only rivets having part number EN6081D5 have been
used to install the titanium angles.'' We have revised paragraph (o) of
this AD to clarify that the ``in accordance with the Accomplishment
Instructions of Revision 02 of Airbus Service Bulletin A320-53-1259''
applies to the whole statement.

Clarification of Retained Effective Date for Paragraph (g) of This AD

    In the introductory text of paragraph (g) of the proposed AD we
retained a compliance time that referred to the effective date of the
existing AD. However, we did not include the specific date of AD 2014-
20-04. We have revised the introductory text of paragraph (g) of this
AD to refer to the effective date of AD 2014-20-04 (November 7, 2014).

Clarification of Retained Effective Date for Paragraph (h)(3) of This
AD

    In paragraph (h)(3) of the proposed AD we retained a compliance
time that referred to the effective date of the existing AD. However,
we did not include the effective date of AD 2014-20-04. We have revised
paragraph (h)(3)

of this AD to refer to the effective date of AD 2014-20-04 (November 7,
2014).

Conclusion

    We reviewed the relevant data, considered the comments received,
and determined that air safety and the public interest require adopting
this final rule with the changes described previously and minor
editorial changes. We have determined that these minor changes:
     Are consistent with the intent that was proposed in the
NPRM for addressing the unsafe condition; and
     Do not add any additional burden upon the public than was
already proposed in the NPRM.
    We also determined that these changes will not increase the
economic burden on any operator or increase the scope of this final
rule.

Related Service Information Under 1 CFR Part 51

    Airbus has issued Service Bulletin A320-53-1259, Revision 03, dated
November 30, 2017. This service information describes procedures for
repetitive inspections for cracking of the four titanium angles between
the belly fairing and the keel beam side panel, an inspection for
cracking of the open holes if any cracking is found in the titanium
angles, repair or replacement if necessary, and a detailed inspection
for and replacement of certain rivets (including a rotating probe test
for cracks in the open holes).
    Airbus has also issued Technical Adaptation 80491184/005/2018,
Issue 1, dated February 08, 2018. This service information describes a
correction to Airbus Service Bulletin A320-53-1259, Revision 03, dated
November 30, 2017.
    This AD also requires Airbus Service Bulletin A320-53-1014,
Revision 2, dated September 1, 1994, which the Director of the Federal
Register approved for incorporation by reference as of November 7, 2014
(79 FR 59636, October 3, 2014).
    This service information is reasonably available because the
interested parties have access to it through their normal course of
business or by the means identified in the ADDRESSES section.

Costs of Compliance

    We estimate that this AD affects 1,250 airplanes of U.S. registry.
We estimate the following costs to comply with this AD:

                                                 Estimated Costs
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
           Labor cost              Parts cost         Cost per product              Cost on U.S. operators
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
295 work[dash]hours x $85 per            $1,045  $26,120...................  $32,650,000.
 hour = $25,075 (Retained
 actions from AD 2014-20-04).
Up to 168 work[dash]hours x $85               0  Up to $14,280.............  Up to $17,850,000.
 per hour = Up to $14,280 (New
 actions of this AD).
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

    We estimate the following costs to do any necessary replacement
that would be required based on the results of the inspection. We have
no way of determining the number of aircraft that might need this
replacement:

                                     Estimated Costs of On-Condition Actions
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
                                                                                Cost per
                                  Labor cost                                     Parts cost \*\      product
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
168 work-hours x $85 per hour = $14,280.......................................              $0          $14,280
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
* We have received no definitive data that would enable us to provide cost estimates for the on-condition parts
  costs.

Authority for This Rulemaking

    Title 49 of the United States Code specifies the FAA's authority to
issue rules on aviation safety. Subtitle I, section 106, describes the
authority of the FAA Administrator. Subtitle VII: Aviation Programs,
describes in more detail the scope of the Agency's authority.
    We are issuing this rulemaking under the authority described in
Subtitle VII, Part A, Subpart III, Section 44701: ``General
requirements.'' Under that section, Congress charges the FAA with
promoting safe flight of civil aircraft in air commerce by prescribing
regulations for practices, methods, and procedures the Administrator
finds necessary for safety in air commerce. This regulation is within
the scope of that authority because it addresses an unsafe condition
that is likely to exist or develop on products identified in this
rulemaking action.
    This AD is issued in accordance with authority delegated by the
Executive Director, Aircraft Certification Service, as authorized by
FAA Order 8000.51C. In accordance with that order, issuance of ADs is
normally a function of the Compliance and Airworthiness Division, but
during this transition period, the Executive Director has delegated the
authority to issue ADs applicable to transport category airplanes and
associated appliances to the Director of the System Oversight Division.

Regulatory Findings

    We determined that this AD will not have federalism implications
under Executive Order 13132. This AD will not have a substantial direct
effect on the States, on the relationship between the national
government and the States, or on the distribution of power and
responsibilities among the various levels of government.
    For the reasons discussed above, I certify that this AD:
    1. Is not a ``significant regulatory action'' under Executive Order
12866;
    2. Is not a ``significant rule'' under the DOT Regulatory Policies
and Procedures (44 FR 11034, February 26, 1979);
    3. Will not affect intrastate aviation in Alaska; and
    4. Will not have a significant economic impact, positive or
negative, on a substantial number of small entities under the criteria
of the Regulatory Flexibility Act.

List of Subjects in 14 CFR Part 39

    Air transportation, Aircraft, Aviation safety, Incorporation by
reference, Safety.

Adoption of the Amendment

    Accordingly, under the authority delegated to me by the
Administrator, the FAA amends 14 CFR part 39 as follows:

PART 39--AIRWORTHINESS DIRECTIVES

0
1. The authority citation for part 39 continues to read as follows:

    Authority: 49 U.S.C. 106(g), 40113, 44701.

Sec.  39.13  [Amended]

0
2. The FAA amends Sec.  39.13 by removing Airworthiness Directive (AD)
2014-20-04, Amendment 39-17977 (79 FR 59636, October 3, 2014), and
adding the following new AD:

2019-08-07 Airbus SAS: Amendment 39-19628; Docket No. FAA-2018-0795;
Product Identifier 2018-NM-076-AD.

(a) Effective Date

    This AD is effective June 26, 2019.

(b) Affected ADs

    This AD replaces AD 2014-20-04, Amendment 39-17977 (79 FR 59636,
October 3, 2014) (``AD 2014-20-04'').

(c) Applicability

    This AD applies to the Airbus SAS airplanes specified in
paragraphs (c)(1), (c)(2), (c)(3), and (c)(4) of this AD,
certificated in any category, all manufacturer serial numbers.
    (1) Model A318-111, -112, -121, and -122 airplanes.
    (2) Model A319-111, -112, -113, -114, -115, -131, -132, and -133
airplanes.
    (3) Model A320-211, -212, -214, -216, -231, -232, and -233
airplanes.
    (4) Model A321-111, -112, -131, -211, -212, -213, -231, and -232
airplanes.

(d) Subject

    Air Transport Association (ATA) of America Code 53, Fuselage.

(e) Reason

    This AD was prompted by reports of cracks at the lower riveting
of the four titanium angles that connect the belly fairing to the
keel beam side panels on both sides of the fuselage. We are issuing
this AD to address cracking of the titanium angles that connect the
belly fairing to the keel beam side panels on both sides of the
fuselage, which could affect the structural integrity of the
airplane.

(f) Compliance

    Comply with this AD within the compliance times specified,
unless already done.

(g) Retained Modification, With No Changes

    This paragraph restates the requirements of paragraph (g) of AD
2014-20-04, with no changes. For Model A320-211 and -231 series
airplanes, manufacturer serial numbers 003 through 092 inclusive:
Prior to the accumulation of 12,000 total landings on the airplane,
or within 300 days after January 10, 1994 (the effective date of AD
93-24-11, Amendment 39-8760 (58 FR 64875, December 10, 1993)),
whichever occurs later, modify the belly fairing structure, in
accordance with the Accomplishment Instructions of an Airbus service
bulletin specified in paragraph (g)(1), (g)(2), or (g)(3) of this
AD. As of November 7, 2014 (the effective date of AD 2014-20-04),
use only the Airbus service bulletin specified in paragraph (g)(3)
of this AD.
    (1) Airbus Industrie Service Bulletin A320-53-1014, dated June
25, 1992.
    (2) Airbus Industrie Service Bulletin A320-53-1014, Revision 1,
dated May 26, 1993.
    (3) Airbus Service Bulletin A320-53-1014, Revision 2, dated
September 1, 1994.

(h) Retained Repetitive Inspection, With Updated Service Information

    This paragraph restates the requirements of paragraph (h) of AD
2014-20-04, with updated service information. At the latest of the
compliance times specified in paragraphs (h)(1), (h)(2), and (h)(3)
of this AD: Do a detailed inspection for cracking of the four
titanium angles between the belly fairing and the keel beam side
panel, in accordance with the Accomplishment Instructions of Airbus
Service Bulletin A320-53-1259, dated November 6, 2012; Airbus
Service Bulletin A320-53-1259, Revision 01, dated November 26, 2013;
Airbus Service Bulletin A320-53-1259, Revision 02, dated March 24,
2016; or Airbus Service Bulletin A320-53-1259, Revision 03, dated
November 30, 2017. After the effective date of this AD, only Airbus
Service Bulletin A320-53-1259, Revision 03, dated November 30, 2017,
may be used. Where Airbus Service Bulletin A320-53-1259, Revision
03, dated November 30, 2017, specifies to refer to Figure A GCAAA--
Sheet 02, instead use Airbus Technical Adaptation 80491184/005/2018,
Issue 1, dated February 08, 2018.
    (1) Before the accumulation of 30,000 total flight cycles or
60,000 total flight hours, whichever occurs first after first flight
of the airplane.
    (2) Within 30,000 flight cycles or 60,000 flight hours,
whichever occurs first after modification of the airplane as
required by paragraph (g) of this AD, or after installation of new
titanium angles, provided that, prior to installation, a rototest
for cracking on the open holes has been accomplished with no crack
findings, in accordance with the Accomplishment Instructions of
Airbus Service Bulletin A320-53-1259, dated November 6, 2012; Airbus
Service Bulletin A320-53-1259, Revision 01, dated November 26, 2013;
Airbus Service Bulletin A320-53-1259, Revision 02, dated March 24,
2016; or Airbus Service Bulletin A320-53-1259, Revision 03, dated
November 30, 2017. After the effective date of this AD, only Airbus
Service Bulletin A320-53-1259, Revision 03, dated November 30, 2017,
may be used. Where Airbus Service Bulletin A320-53-1259, Revision
03, dated November 30, 2017, specifies to refer to Figure A GCAAA--
Sheet 02, instead use Airbus Technical Adaptation 80491184/005/2018,
Issue 1, dated February 08, 2018.
    (3) Within 3,000 flight cycles or 6,000 flight hours, whichever
occurs first after November 7, 2014 (the effective date of AD 2014-
20-04).

(i) Retained Post-Inspection Actions for No Crack Findings, With
Updated Service Information

    This paragraph restates the requirements of paragraph (i) of AD
2014-20-04, with updated service information. If, during any
inspection required by paragraph (h) of this AD, there is no crack
finding: Accomplish the actions specified in either paragraph (i)(1)
or (i)(2) of this AD.
    (1) Repeat the inspection required by paragraph (h) of this AD
at intervals not to exceed 5,000 flight cycles or 10,000 flight
hours, whichever occurs first.
    (2) Before further flight after the inspection required by
paragraph (h) of this AD, remove all inspected titanium angles,
accomplish a rototest for cracking on the open holes and, provided
no cracks are found, install new titanium angles, in accordance with
the Accomplishment Instructions of Airbus Service Bulletin A320-53-
1259, dated November 6, 2012; Airbus Service Bulletin A320-53-1259,
Revision 01, dated November 26, 2013; or Airbus Service Bulletin
A320-53-1259, Revision 03, dated November 30, 2017. After the
effective date of this AD, only Airbus Service Bulletin A320-53-
1259, Revision 03, dated November 30, 2017, may be used. Where
Airbus Service Bulletin A320-53-1259, Revision 03, dated November
30, 2017, specifies to refer to Figure A GCAAA--Sheet 02, instead
use Airbus Technical Adaptation 80491184/005/2018, Issue 1, dated
February 08, 2018.

(j) Retained Post-Inspection Actions for Any Crack Findings, With
Updated Service Information

    This paragraph restates the requirements of paragraph (j) of AD
2014-20-04, with updated service information. If, during any
inspection required by paragraph (h) of this AD, there is any crack
finding: Before further flight, remove the affected titanium
angle(s), accomplish a rototest for cracking on the open holes, and,
provided no cracks are found, install new titanium angles, in
accordance with the Accomplishment Instructions of Airbus Service
Bulletin A320-53-1259, dated November 6, 2012; Airbus Service
Bulletin A320-53-1259, Revision 01, dated November 26, 2013; or
Airbus Service Bulletin A320-53-1259, Revision 03, dated November
30, 2017. After the effective date of this AD, only Airbus Service
Bulletin A320-53-1259, Revision 03, dated November 30, 2017, may be
used. Where Airbus Service Bulletin A320-53-1259, Revision 03, dated
November 30, 2017, specifies to refer to Figure A GCAAA--Sheet 02,
instead use Airbus Technical Adaptation 80491184/005/2018, Issue 1,
dated February 08, 2018.

(k) Retained Post-Installation Repetitive Inspections, With Updated
Service Information and Revised Compliance Language

    This paragraph restates the requirements of paragraph (k) of AD
2014-20-04, with updated service information and revised compliance
language. For airplanes on which new titanium angles were installed
as specified in paragraph (i)(2) or (j) of this AD: Within 30,000
flight cycles or 60,000 flight hours, whichever occurs first after
the installation, accomplish a detailed inspection for cracking of
the replaced titanium angles between the belly fairing and the keel
beam side panel, in accordance with the Accomplishment Instructions
of Airbus

Service Bulletin A320-53-1259, dated November 6, 2012; Airbus
Service Bulletin A320-53-1259, Revision 01, dated November 26, 2013;
Airbus Service Bulletin A320-53-1259, Revision 02, dated March 24,
2016; or Airbus Service Bulletin A320-53-1259, Revision 03, dated
November 30, 2017. After the effective date of this AD, only Airbus
Service Bulletin A320-53-1259, Revision 03, dated November 30, 2017,
may be used. Repeat the inspection thereafter at intervals not to
exceed 5,000 flight cycles or 10,000 flight hours, whichever occurs
first. Where Airbus Service Bulletin A320-53-1259, Revision 03,
dated November 30, 2017, specifies to refer to Figure A GCAAA--Sheet
02, instead use Airbus Technical Adaptation 80491184/005/2018, Issue
1, dated February 08, 2018.

(l) Retained Post-Inspection Actions for Any Crack Findings During
Post-Installation Inspections, With Updated Service Information

    This paragraph restates the requirements of paragraph (l) of AD
2014-20-04, with updated service information. If, during any
inspection as required by paragraph (k) of this AD, there is any
crack finding: Before further flight, remove the affected titanium
angles, accomplish a rototest for cracking on the open holes, and,
provided no cracks are found, install new titanium angles, in
accordance with the Accomplishment Instructions of Airbus Service
Bulletin A320-53-1259, dated November 6, 2012; Airbus Service
Bulletin A320-53-1259, Revision 01, dated November 26, 2013; or
Airbus Service Bulletin A320-53-1259, Revision 03, dated November
30, 2017. After the effective date of this AD, only Airbus Service
Bulletin A320-53-1259, Revision 03, dated November 30, 2017, may be
used. Where Airbus Service Bulletin A320-53-1259, Revision 03, dated
November 30, 2017, specifies to refer to Figure A GCAAA--Sheet 02,
instead use Airbus Technical Adaptation 80491184/005/2018, Issue 1,
dated February 08, 2018.

(m) Retained Corrective Action for Rototest Crack Finding, With Updated
Contact Information

    This paragraph restates the requirements of paragraph (m) of AD
2014-20-04, with updated contact information. If, during any
rototest as required by paragraph (i), (j), or (l) of this AD, any
crack is found: Before further flight, repair using a method
approved by the Manager, International Section, Transport Standards
Branch, FAA; or the European Aviation Safety Agency (EASA); or
Airbus SAS's EASA Design Organization Approval (DOA). If approved by
the DOA, the approval must include the DOA-authorized signature.

(n) Retained No Termination Action for Repetitive Inspections, With No
Changes

    This paragraph restates the requirements of paragraph (n) of AD
2014-20-04, with no changes. Repair or replacement of parts as
specified in this AD does not terminate the repetitive inspections
required by this AD.

(o) New Requirement of This AD: Detailed Inspection for Certain Rivets

    For airplanes previously modified (replacement of affected
titanium angles) using the Accomplishment Instructions of Revision
02 of Airbus Service Bulletin A320-53-1259: At the earlier of the
times specified in paragraphs (o)(1) and (o)(2) of this AD, do a
detailed inspection of the rivet installation in the belly fairing
shear walls and the titanium angles for part number EN6081D4 series
rivets in accordance with the Accomplishment Instructions of Airbus
Service Bulletin A320-53-1259, Revision 03, dated November 30, 2017.
A review of the airplane maintenance records is acceptable to comply
with the requirements of this paragraph for that airplane, provided
it can be determined that no titanium angles have been installed on
that airplane in accordance with the Accomplishment Instructions of
Revision 02 of Airbus Service Bulletin A320-53-1259, or if only
rivets having part number EN6081D5 have been used to install the
titanium angles on that airplane in accordance with the
Accomplishment Instructions of Revision 02 of Airbus Service
Bulletin A320-53-1259. Where Airbus Service Bulletin A320-53-1259,
Revision 03, dated November 30, 2017, specifies to refer to Figure A
GCAAA--Sheet 02, instead use Airbus Technical Adaptation 80491184/
005/2018, Issue 1, dated February 08, 2018.
    (1) Within 2,000 flight cycles or 4,000 flight hours, whichever
occurs first after the effective date of this AD.
    (2) Before exceeding 5,000 flight cycles or 10,000 flight hours,
whichever occurs first after accomplishment of the last inspection
specified in paragraph (h) of this AD.

(p) New Requirements of This AD: Replacement of Certain Rivets

    If any part number EN6081D4 series rivet is found during any
inspection required by paragraph (o) of this AD, before further
flight, do the actions specified in paragraphs (p)(1) and (p)(2) of
this AD.
    (1) Remove the part number EN6081D4 series rivets and do a
rotating probe test of the open holes for cracks, in accordance with
the Accomplishment Instructions of Airbus Service Bulletin A320-53-
1259, Revision 03, dated November 30, 2017. If any crack is found
during any inspection required by this paragraph, before further
flight, obtain corrective actions approved by the Manager,
International Section, Transport Standards Branch, FAA; or EASA; or
Airbus SAS's EASA DOA; and accomplish the corrective actions within
the compliance time specified therein. If approved by the DOA, the
approval must include the DOA-authorized signature.
    (2) Replace part number EN6081D4 series rivets with part number
EN6081D5 series rivets in accordance with the Accomplishment
Instructions of Airbus Service Bulletin A320-53-1259, Revision 03,
dated November 30, 2017. Where Airbus Service Bulletin A320-53-1259,
Revision 03, dated November 30, 2017, specifies to refer to Figure A
GCAAA--Sheet 02, instead use Airbus Technical Adaptation 80491184/
005/2018, Issue 1, dated February 08, 2018.

(q) Service Information Exception

    Where the Accomplishment Instructions of Airbus Service Bulletin
A320-53-1259, Revision 03, dated November 30, 2017, specify to
install titanium angle part numbers D5337060121200 and
D5337060121400, this AD allows the installation of titanium angle
part numbers D5337060121295 and D5337060121495, respectively.

(r) Other FAA AD Provisions

    (1) Alternative Methods of Compliance (AMOCs): The Manager,
International Section, Transport Standards Branch, FAA, has the
authority to approve AMOCs for this AD, if requested using the
procedures found in 14 CFR 39.19. In accordance with 14 CFR 39.19,
send your request to your principal inspector or local Flight
Standards District Office, as appropriate. If sending information
directly to the International Section, send it to the attention of
the person identified in paragraph (s)(2) of this AD. Information
may be emailed to<EMAIL_ADDRESS>    (i) Before using any approved AMOC, notify your appropriate
principal inspector, or lacking a principal inspector, the manager
of the local flight standards district office/certificate holding
district office.
    (ii) AMOCs approved previously for AD 2014-20-04, are approved
as AMOCs for the corresponding provisions of this AD.
    (2) Contacting the Manufacturer: As of the effective date of
this AD, for any requirement in this AD to obtain corrective actions
from a manufacturer, the action must be accomplished using a method
approved by the Manager, International Section, Transport Standards
Branch, FAA; or EASA; or Airbus SAS's EASA DOA. If approved by the
DOA, the approval must include the DOA-authorized signature.
    (3) Required for Compliance (RC): If any service information
contains procedures or tests that are identified as RC, those
procedures and tests must be done to comply with this AD; any
procedures or tests that are not identified as RC are recommended.
Those procedures and tests that are not identified as RC may be
deviated from using accepted methods in accordance with the
operator's maintenance or inspection program without obtaining
approval of an AMOC, provided the procedures and tests identified as
RC can be done and the airplane can be put back in an airworthy
condition. Any substitutions or changes to procedures or tests
identified as RC require approval of an AMOC.

(s) Related Information

    (1) Refer to Mandatory Continuing Airworthiness Information
(MCAI) EASA AD 2018-0091, dated April 20, 2018, for related
information. This MCAI may be found in the AD docket on the internet
at http://www.regulations.gov by searching for and locating Docket
No. FAA-2018-0795.
    (2) For more information about this AD, contact Sanjay Ralhan,
Aerospace Engineer, International Section, Transport Standards
Branch, FAA, 2200 South 216th St., Des Moines, WA 98198; phone and
fax:<PHONE_NUMBER>.

(t) Material Incorporated by Reference

    (1) The Director of the Federal Register approved the
incorporation by reference (IBR) of the service information listed
in this paragraph under 5 U.S.C. 552(a) and 1 CFR part 51.

    (2) You must use this service information as applicable to do
the actions required by this AD, unless this AD specifies otherwise.
    (3) The following service information was approved for IBR on
June 26, 2019.
    (i) Airbus Service Bulletin A320-53-1259, Revision 03, dated
November 30, 2017.
    (ii) Airbus Technical Adaptation 80491184/005/2018, Issue 1,
dated February 08, 2018. The date appears only on the last page of
the document.
    (4) The following service information was approved for IBR on
November 7, 2014 (79 FR 59636, October 3, 2014).
    (i) Airbus Service Bulletin A320-53-1014, Revision 2, dated
September 1, 1994, including supplementary page 7A. Pages 1 through
3, 15, 19, 20, and 25 of this document are identified as Revision 2,
dated September 1, 1994; pages 4 through 8, 10, 12, 16 through 18,
and 21 through 24 are identified as Revision 1, dated May 26, 1993;
and pages 9, 11, 13, 14, and 26 are identified as the original,
dated June 25, 1992.
    (ii) [Reserved]
    (5) For service information identified in this AD, contact
Airbus SAS, Airworthiness Office--EIAS, Rond-Point Emile Dewoitine
No: 2, 31700 Blagnac Cedex, France; phone: +33 5 61 93 36 96; fax:
+33 5 61 93 44 51; email<EMAIL_ADDRESS>internet:
http://www.airbus.com.
    (6) You may view this service information at the FAA, Transport
Standards Branch, 2200 South 216th St., Des Moines, WA. For
information on the availability of this material at the FAA, call
206-231-3195.
    (7) You may view this service information that is incorporated
by reference at the National Archives and Records Administration
(NARA). For information on the availability of this material at
NARA, call<PHONE_NUMBER>, or go to: http://www.archives.gov/federal-register/cfr/ibr-locations.html.

    Issued in Des Moines, Washington, on April 10, 2019.
Dionne Palermo,
Acting Director, System Oversight Division, Aircraft Certification
Service.
[FR Doc. 2019-10653 Filed 5-21-19; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910-13-P


[Federal Register Volume 86, Number 226 (Monday, November 29, 2021)]
[Notices]
[Page 67780]
[FR Doc No: 2021-25912]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

[SEC File No. 270-523, OMB Control No. 3235-0585]

Submission for OMB Review; Comment Request, Extension: Rule
206(4)-7

Upon Written Request, Copies Available From: Securities and Exchange
Commission, Office of FOIA Services, 100 F Street NE, Washington, DC
20549-2736

    Notice is hereby given that, pursuant to the Paperwork Reduction
Act of 1995 (44 U.S.C. 3501 et seq.), the Securities and Exchange
Commission (``Commission'') is soliciting comments on the collection of
information summarized below. The Commission plans to submit this
existing collection of information to the Office of Management and
Budget for extension and approval.
    The title for the collection of information is ``Investment
Advisers Act rule 206(4)-7, 17 CFR 275.206(4)-7, Compliance procedures
and practices.'' This collection of information is found at 17 CFR
275.206(4)-7, and is mandatory. Rule 206(4)-7 under the Investment
Advisers Act of 1940 (``Advisers Act'') requires each investment
adviser registered with the Commission to (1) adopt and implement
written policies and procedures reasonably designed to prevent
violations of the Advisers Act and its rules, (2) review those
compliance policies and procedures annually, and (3) designate a chief
compliance officer who is responsible for administering the compliance
policies and procedures. The rule is designed to protect investors by
fostering better compliance with the securities laws. The collection of
information under rule 206(4)-7 is necessary to help ensure that
investment advisers maintain comprehensive internal programs that
promote the advisers' compliance with the Advisers Act and its rules.
The Commission's examination and oversight staff may review the
information collected to assess investment advisers' compliance
programs. Responses provided to the Commission pursuant to the rule in
the context of the Commission's examination and oversight program are
generally kept confidential.\1\ An agency may not conduct or sponsor,
and a person is not required to respond to, a collection of information
unless it displays a currently valid control number.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \1\ See section 210(b) of the Advisers Act (15 U.S.C. 80b-
10(b)).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    The respondents to this information collection are investment
advisers registered with the Commission. Updated data indicate that
there were 14,376 advisers registered with the Commission as of August
2021. Each respondent would produce one response, per year. Commission
staff has estimated that compliance with rule 206(4)-7 imposes an
annual burden of approximately 90 hours per response. Based on this
figure, Commission staff estimates a total annual burden of 1,293,840
hours for this collection of information.
    Written comments are invited on: (1) Whether the collection of
information is necessary for the proper performance of the functions of
the agency, including whether the information will have practical
utility; (2) the accuracy of the agency's estimate of the burden of the
collection of information; (3) ways to enhance the quality, utility,
and clarity of the information collected; and (4) ways to minimize the
burden of the collection of information on respondents, including
through the use of automated collection techniques or other forms of
information technology. Consideration will be given to comments and
suggestions submitted in writing within 60 days of this publication. An
agency may not conduct or sponsor a collection of information unless it
displays a currently valid OMB control number. No person shall be
subject to any penalty for failing to comply with a collection of
information subject to the PRA that does not display a valid OMB
control number.
    Please direct your written comments to David Bottom, Director/Chief
Information Officer, Securities and Exchange Commission, C/O John R.
Pezzullo, 100 F Street NE, Washington, DC 20549; or send an email to:
[email protected].

    Dated: November 23, 2021.
J. Matthew DeLesDernier,
Assistant Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2021-25912 Filed 11-26-21; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 8011-01-P


[Federal Register Volume 81, Number 251 (Friday, December 30, 2016)]
[Notices]
[Page 96451]
[FR Doc No: 2016-31758]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY

[ER-FRL-9031-1]

Environmental Impact Statements; Notice of Availability

    Responsible Agency: Office of Federal Activities, General
Information<PHONE_NUMBER> or http://www.epa.gov/nepa.

Weekly receipt of Environmental Impact Statements (EISs) Filed 12/19/
2016 Through 12/23/2016.
Pursuant to 40 CFR 1506.9.

Notice

    Section 309(a) of the Clean Air Act requires that EPA make public
its comments on EISs issued by other Federal agencies. EPA's comment
letters on EISs are available at: http://www.epa.gov/compliance/nepa/eisdata.html.

EIS No. 20160312, Draft, USFWS, CA, City of San Diego Vernal Pool
Habitat Conservation Plan, Comment Period Ends: 03/06/2017, Contact:
Dan Cox<PHONE_NUMBER>.
EIS No. 20160313, Final, NASA, FL, Center-wide Operations at the
Kennedy Space Center, Review Period Ends: 01/30/2017, Contact: Donald
Dankert<PHONE_NUMBER>.
EIS No. 20160314, Draft, USFS, CA, Mitsubishi Cement Corporation South
Quarry Plan of Operation, Comment Period Ends: 02/13/2017, Contact:
Scott Eliason<PHONE_NUMBER>.
EIS No. 20160315, Draft, FHWA, IL, Interstate 290 (Eisenhower
Expressway), Comment Period Ends: 02/13/2017, Contact: Catherine A.
Batey<PHONE_NUMBER>.
EIS No. 20160316, Final, Caltrans, FHWA, CA, Eureka Arcata Route 101
Corridor Improvement Project, Review Period Ends: 01/30/2017, Contact:
David Tedrick<PHONE_NUMBER>.
EIS No. 20160317, Draft, BLM, NV, Sagebrush Focal Areas Withdrawal,
Comment Period Ends: 03/31/2017, Contact: Mark Mackiewicz<PHONE_NUMBER>.
EIS No. 20160318, Final, BR, CA, Bay Delta Conservation Plan/California
WaterFix, Review Period Ends: 01/30/2017, Contact: Brooke White 916-
414-2402.

    Dated: December 27, 2016.
Dawn Roberts,
Management Analyst, NEPA Compliance Division, Office of Federal
Activities.
[FR Doc. 2016-31758 Filed 12-29-16; 8:45 am]
 BILLING CODE 6560-50-P