[Federal Register Volume 76, Number 153 (Tuesday, August 9, 2011)]
[Proposed Rules]
[Pages 48751-48754]
[FR Doc No: 2011-20091]

=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY

Coast Guard

33 CFR Part 165

[Docket No. USCG-2011-0489]
RIN 1625-AA87

Security Zones; Captain of the Port Lake Michigan Zone

AGENCY: Coast Guard, DHS.

ACTION: Notice of proposed rulemaking.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: Based on a review of safety and security zones around critical
infrastructure in the Chicago area, the Captain of the Port Sector Lake
Michigan has determined that to better protect such infrastructure,
while also mitigating burdens on waterway users, it is necessary to
amend these security zones in our regulations. Specifically, the Coast
Guard proposes to reduce the size of an existing security zone,
disestablish another security zone, and create three new security
zones.

DATES: Comments and related materials must reach the Coast Guard on or
before September 8, 2011.

ADDRESSES: You may submit comments identified by Coast Guard docket
number USCG-2011-0489 to the Docket Management Facility at the U.S.
Department of Transportation. To avoid duplication, please use only one
of the following methods:
    (1) Online: http://www.regulations.gov.
    (2) Mail: Docket Management Facility (M-30), U.S. Department of
Transportation, West Building Ground Floor, Room W12-140, 1200 New
Jersey Avenue SE., Washington, DC 20590-0001.
    (3) Hand delivery: Room W12-140 on the Ground Floor of the West
Building, 1200 New Jersey Avenue SE., Washington, DC 20590, between 9
a.m. and 5 p.m., Monday through Friday, except Federal holidays. The
telephone number is<PHONE_NUMBER>.
    (4) Fax:<PHONE_NUMBER>.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: If you have questions on this proposed
rule, call MST1 Brenden Otjen Coast Guard Marine Safety Unit,
Willowbrook, IL at<PHONE_NUMBER>. If you have questions on viewing or
submitting material to the docket, call Renee V. Wright, Program
Manager, Docket Operations, telephone<PHONE_NUMBER>.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

Public Participation and Request for Comments

    We encourage you to participate in this rulemaking by submitting
comments and related materials. All comments received will be posted,
without change, to http://www.regulations.gov and will include any
personal information you have provided. We have an agreement with the
Department of Transportation (DOT) to use the Docket Management
Facility. Please see ``Privacy Act'' paragraph below.

Submitting Comments

    If you submit a comment, please include the docket number for this
rulemaking (USCG-2011-0489), indicate the specific section of this
document to which each comment

applies, and give the reason for each comment. We recommend that you
include your name and a mailing address, an e-mail address, or a phone
number in the body of your document so that we can contact you if we
have questions regarding your submission. You may submit your comments
and material by electronic means, mail, fax, or delivery to the Docket
Management Facility at the address under ADDRESSES; but please submit
your comments and material by only one means. If you submit them by
mail or delivery, submit them in an unbound format, no larger than 8\1/
2\ by 11 inches, suitable for copying and electronic filing. If you
submit them by mail and would like to know that they reached the
Facility, please enclose a stamped, self-addressed postcard or
envelope. We will consider all comments and material received during
the comment period. We may change this proposed rule in view of them.

Viewing Comments and Documents

    To view comments, as well as documents mentioned in this preamble
as being available in the docket, go to http://www.regulations.gov at
any time. Enter the docket number for this rulemaking (USCG-2011-0489)
in the ``Keyword'' box, and click ``Search. '' You may also visit
either the Docket Management Facility in Room W12-140 on the ground
floor of the DOT West Building, 1200 New Jersey Avenue SE., Washington,
D.C. 20590, between 9 a.m. and 5 p.m., Monday through Friday, except
Federal holidays; or the U.S. Coast Guard Marine Safety Unit Chicago,
555A Plainfield Rd., Willowbrook, IL 60527, between 8 a.m. and 4 p.m.,
Monday through Friday, except Federal holidays.

Privacy Act

    Anyone can search the electronic form of all comments received into
any of our dockets by the name of the individual submitting the comment
(or signing the comment, if submitted on behalf of an association,
business, labor union, etc.). You may review a Privacy Act notice
regarding our public dockets in the January 17, 2008 issue of the
Federal Register (73 FR 3316).

Public Meeting

    We do not now plan to hold a public meeting. But you may submit a
request for one to the Docket Management Facility at the address under
ADDRESSES explaining why one would be beneficial. If we determine that
one would aid this rulemaking, we will hold one at a time and place
announced by a later notice in the Federal Register.

Background and Purpose

    The Coast Guard recently worked with local governmental agencies to
review the safety and security zones around critical infrastructure in
the Chicago area. Based on this review, the Captain of the Port Sector
Lake Michigan had determined that to better protect critical
infrastructure while also mitigating burdens on waterway users it is
necessary to reduce the size of an existing security zone, disestablish
an existing security zone, and establish three new security zones.

Discussion of Proposed Rule

    For the reasons discussed in the preceding paragraph, the Captain
of the Port Sector Lake Michigan proposes to amend 33 CFR 165.904 and
910. Specifically, this proposed rule would reduce the size of the
safety and security zone entitled Lake Michigan at Chicago Harbor &
Burnham Park Harbor-Safety and Security Zone, which is located at 33
CFR 165.904. The revised zone will be significantly reduced in size due
to the disestablishment of Meigs Airfield and the need to secure only
Burnham Park harbor during high profile visits that require security
zone enforcement. This proposed reduction of the Chicago Harbor &
Burnham Park Harbor-Safety and Security Zone would result in the zone
encompassing all U.S. navigable waters of Lake Michigan within Burnham
Park Harbor shoreward of a line across the entrance of the harbor
connecting coordinates 41[deg]51'09'' N, 87[deg]36'36'' W and
41[deg]51'11'' N, 87[deg]36'22'' W.
    In addition to reducing the size of the security zone described in
Sec.  165.904(a), this proposed rule would also disestablish a security
zone. Specifically, this proposed rule would disestablish the security
zone in 33 CFR 165.910(a)(1) entitled Security Zones; Captain of the
Port Lake Michigan; Navy Pier Northside.
    Finally, this proposed rule would establish three new security
zones in 33 CFR 165.910. The first new security zone would be located
in the vicinity of the Jardine Water Treatment Plant, Chicago,
Illinois. The Jardine Water Filtration Plant security zone would
encompass all U.S. navigable waters of Lake Michigan within an arc of a
100-yard radius with its center located on the approximate position
41[deg]53'46'' N, 87[deg]36'23'' W.
    The second new security zone would be located in the vicinity of
the Wilson Avenue Crib, Chicago, Illinois. It would encompass all U.S.
navigable waters of Lake Michigan within the arc of a circle with a
100-yard radius with its center in approximate position 41[deg]58'00''
N, 87[deg]35'30'' W.
    The third new security zone would be located in the vicinity of the
new Four Mile Intake Crib in Chicago, Illinois. It would encompass all
U.S. navigable waters of Lake Michigan within the arc of a circle with
a 100-yard radius with its center in approximate position
41[deg]52'40'' N, 87[deg]32'45'' W.
    In accordance with 33 CFR 165.33, no person or vessel would be able
to enter or remain in one of the security zones discussed in this
proposed rule without permission of the Captain of the Port Sector Lake
Michigan. The Captain of the Port Sector Lake Michigan, at his or her
discretion, may permit persons and vessels to enter the security zones
addressed in this proposed rule. For instance, the Captain of the Port
Sector Lake Michigan may permit those U.S. Coast Guard certificated
passenger vessels that normally load and unload passengers at the north
side of Navy Pier to operate in the Jardine Water Filtration Plant
security zone.

Regulatory Analyses

    We developed this proposed rule after considering numerous statutes
and executive orders related to rulemaking. Below we summarize our
analyses based on 13 of these statutes or executive orders.

Regulatory Planning and Review

    This proposed rule is not a significant regulatory action under
section 3(f) of Executive Order 12866, Regulatory Planning and Review,
and does not require an assessment of potential costs and benefits
under section 6(a)(3) of that Order. The Office of Management and
Budget has not reviewed it under that Order. We conclude that this
proposed rule is not a significant regulatory action because we
anticipate that it would have minimal impact on the economy, would not
interfere with other agencies, would not adversely alter the budget of
any grant or loan recipients, and would not raise any novel legal or
policy issues. The security zones amended and established by this
proposed rule would be relatively small and enforced for relatively
short time. Also, each security zone is designed to minimize its impact
on navigable waters. Furthermore, each security zone has been designed
to allow vessels to transit unrestricted to portions of the waterways
not affected by the security zones. Thus, restrictions on vessel
movements within that particular area are expected to be minimal. Under
certain conditions, moreover, vessels may still transit through each
security zone when permitted by the Captain of the Port,

Sector Lake Michigan. On the whole, the Coast Guard expects
insignificant adverse impact to mariners from the activation of these
security zones.

Small Entities

    Under the Regulatory Flexibility Act (5 U.S.C. 601-612), we have
considered whether this proposed rule would have a significant economic
impact on a substantial number of small entities. The term ``small
entities'' comprises small businesses, not-for-profit organizations
that are independently owned and operated and are not dominant in their
fields, and governmental jurisdictions with populations of less than
50,000.
    The Coast Guard certifies under 5 U.S.C. 605(b) that this proposed
rule would not have a significant economic impact on a substantial
number of small entities. This proposed rule would affect the following
entities, some of which might be small entities: the owners and
operators of vessels intending to transit or anchor in the security
zones addressed in this proposed rule. These security zones would not
have a significant economic impact on a substantial number of small
entities for the following reasons: the security zones in this proposed
rule would be in small areas surrounding the intake cribs or areas near
shore to Chicago's water filtration plants; the security zones have
been designed to allow traffic to pass safely around these zones
whenever possible.
    If you think that your business, organization, or governmental
jurisdiction qualifies as a small entity and that this proposed rule
would have a significant economic impact on it, please submit a comment
(see ADDRESSES) explaining why you think it qualifies and how and to
what degree this rule would economically affect it.

Assistance for Small Entities

    Under section 213(a) of the Small Business Regulatory Enforcement
Fairness Act of 1996 (Pub. L. 104-121), we want to assist small
entities in understanding this proposed rule so that they can better
evaluate its effects on them and participate in the rulemaking. If this
proposed rule would affect your small business, organization, or
governmental jurisdiction and you have questions concerning its
provisions or options for compliance, please contact the Waterways
Management Department, Coast Guard Marine Safety Unit Chicago,
Willowbrook, IL at<PHONE_NUMBER>. The Coast Guard will not retaliate
against small entities that question or object to this rule or any
policy or action of the Coast Guard.

Collection of Information

    This proposed rule calls for no new collection of information under
the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 (44 U.S.C. 3501-3520).

Federalism

    A rule has implications for federalism under Executive Order 13132,
Federalism, if it has a substantial direct effect on State or local
governments and would either preempt State law or impose a substantial
direct cost of compliance on them. We have analyzed this proposed rule
under that Order and have determined that it does not have implications
for federalism.

Unfunded Mandates Reform Act

    The Unfunded Mandates Reform Act of 1995 (2 U.S.C. 1531-1538)
requires Federal agencies to assess the effects of their discretionary
regulatory actions. In particular, the Act addresses actions that may
result in the expenditure by a State, local, or tribal government, in
the aggregate, or by the private sector of $100,000,000 (adjusted for
inflation) or more in any one year. Though this proposed rule would not
result in such an expenditure, we do discuss the effects of this
proposed rule elsewhere in this preamble.

Taking of Private Property

    This proposed rule would not affect the taking of private property
or otherwise have taking implications under Executive Order 12630,
Governmental Actions and Interference with Constitutionally Protected
Property Rights.

Civil Justice Reform

    This proposed rule meets applicable standards in sections 3(a) and
3(b)(2) of Executive Order 12988, Civil Justice Reform, to minimize
litigation, eliminate ambiguity, and reduce burden.

Protection of Children

    We have analyzed this proposed rule under Executive Order 13045,
Protection of Children from Environmental Health Risks and Safety
Risks. This proposed rule is not an economically significant rule and
does not create an environmental risk to health or risk to safety that
may disproportionately affect children.

Indian Tribal Governments

    This proposed rule does not have tribal implications under
Executive Order 13175, Consultation and Coordination with Indian Tribal
Governments, because it does not have a substantial direct effect on
one or more Indian tribes, on the relationship between the Federal
Government and Indian tribes, or on the distribution of power and
responsibilities between the Federal Government and Indian tribes.

Energy Effects

    We have analyzed this proposed rule under Executive Order 13211,
Actions Concerning Regulations That Significantly Affect Energy Supply,
Distribution, or Use. We have determined that it is not a ``significant
energy action'' under that order because it is not a ``significant
regulatory action'' under Executive Order 12866 and is not likely to
have a significant adverse effect on the supply, distribution, or use
of energy. The Administrator of the Office of Information and
Regulatory Affairs has not designated it as a significant energy
action. Therefore, it does not require a Statement of Energy Effects
under Executive Order 13211.

Technical Standards

    The National Technology Transfer and Advancement Act (NTTAA) (15
U.S.C. 272 note) directs agencies to use voluntary consensus standards
in their regulatory activities unless the agency provides Congress,
through the Office of Management and Budget, with an explanation of why
using these standards would be inconsistent with applicable law or
otherwise impractical. Voluntary consensus standards are technical
standards (e.g., specifications of materials, performance, design, or
operation; test methods; sampling procedures; and related management
systems practices) that are developed or adopted by voluntary consensus
standards bodies.
    This proposed rule does not use technical standards. Therefore, we
did not consider the use of voluntary consensus standards.

Environment

    We have analyzed this proposed rule under Commandant Instruction
M16475.lD and Department of Homeland Security Management Directive
5100.1, which guide the Coast Guard in complying with the National
Environmental Policy Act of 1969 (NEPA)(42 U.S.C. 4321-4370f), and have
made a preliminary determination that this action is not likely to have
a significant effect on the human environment. This proposed rule
involves the establishing, disestablishing, and changing of security
zones and therefore, is categorically excluded under paragraph 34(g) of
the Instruction. A preliminary environmental analysis check list
supporting this preliminary

determination is available in the docket where indicated under
ADDRESSES. We seek any comments or information that may lead to the
discovery of a significant environmental impact from this proposed
rule.

List of Subjects in 33 CFR Part 165

    Harbors, Marine safety, Navigation (water), Reporting and record
keeping requirements, Security measures, Waterways.
    For the reasons discussed in the preamble, the Coast Guard proposes
to amend 33 CFR Part 165 as follows:

PART 165--REGULATED NAVIGATION AREAS AND LIMITED ACCESS AREAS

    1. The authority citation for part 165 continues to read as
follows:
    33 U.S.C. 1231; 46 U.S.C. Chapter 701, 3306, 3703; 50 U.S.C. 191,
195; 33 CFR 1.05-1, 6.04-1, 6.04-6, and 160.5; Public Law 107-295, 116
Stat. 2064; Department of Homeland Security Delegation No. 0170.1.
    2. Amend Sec.  165.904 by revising paragraph (a) to read as
follows:

Sec.  165.904  Lake Michigan at Chicago Harbor & Burnham Park Harbor--
Safety and Security Zone.

    (a) Location. All waters of Lake Michigan within Burnham Park
Harbor shoreward of a line across the entrance of the harbor connecting
coordinates 41[deg]51'09'' N, 87[deg]36'36'' W and 41[deg]51'11'' N,
87[deg]36'22'' W.
* * * * *
    3. In Sec.  165.910, revise paragraph (a)(1),(a)(1)(i) and add
paragraphs (a)(10) and (a)(11) to read as follows:

Sec.  165.910  Security Zones; Captain of the Port Lake Michigan.

    (a) * * *
    (1) Jardine Water Filtration Plant.
    (i) Location. All waters of Lake Michigan within the arc of a 100-
yard radius with its center located on the north wall of Jardine Water
Filtration Plant, approximate position 41[deg]53'46'' N, 87[deg]36'23''
W; (NAD 83)
* * * * *
    (10) Wilson Avenue Intake Crib. All waters of Lake Michigan within
the arc of a circle with a 100-yard radius of the Wilson Avenue Crib
with its center in approximate position 41[deg]58'00'' N,
87[deg]35'30'' W. (NAD 83)
    (11) Four Mile Intake Crib. All waters of Lake Michigan within the
arc of a circle with a 100-yard radius of the Four Mile Crib with its
center in approximate position 41[deg]52'40'' N, 87[deg]32'45'' W. (NAD
83)
* * * * *

    Dated: July 21 2011.
M.W. Sibley,
Captain, U.S. Coast Guard, Captain of the Port, Sector Lake Michigan.
[FR Doc. 2011-20091 Filed 8-8-11; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 9110-04-P


[Federal Register Volume 79, Number 197 (Friday, October 10, 2014)]
[Notices]
[Pages 61371-61372]
[FR Doc No: 2014-24364]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION

Federal Motor Carrier Safety Administration

[Docket Nos. FMCSA-2008-0362 and FMCSA-2006-26367]

Motor Carrier Safety Advisory Committee (MCSAC) and Medical
Review Board (MRB) Meetings: Public Meetings

AGENCY: Federal Motor Carrier Safety Administration (FMCSA), DOT.

ACTION: Announcement of advisory committee public meetings.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: FMCSA announces a joint meeting of its Motor Carrier Safety
Advisory Committee (MCSAC) and Medical Review Board (MRB) on October
27, 2014, and a meeting of the MCSAC on Tuesday, October 28. MCSAC and
the MRB will jointly identify concepts the Agency should consider in
relation to Schedule II medications and their use by

commercial motor vehicle (CMV) drivers in interstate commerce. This
follows the MRB's consideration of the effects of Schedule II
medications on CMV drivers' ability to operate safely on September 11,
2013, and July 29-30, 2014. On Tuesday, October 28, the MCSAC will meet
to finalize its deliberations on financial responsibility requirements
for motor carriers and to consider the findings of its Subcommittee on
the Long-Haul Cross-Border Trucking Pilot Program with Mexico. Meetings
are open to the public for their entirety, and there will be a public
comment period at the end of each day.

DATES: Times and Dates: The joint meeting will be held on Monday,
October 27, 2014, from 9 a.m. to 4:30 p.m., Eastern Daylight Time
(E.T.), at the Hilton Alexandria Old Town, 1767 King Street,
Alexandria, VA 22314 in the Washington and Jefferson Rooms on the 2nd
floor. On Tuesday, October 28, the MCSAC will meet at that same
location from 9 a.m. to 4:30 p.m., E.T. Copies of all MRB and MCSAC
Task Statements and an agenda for the entire meeting will be made
available in advance of the meeting at http://mrb.fmcsa.dot.gov and
http://mcsac.fmcsa.dot.gov.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Ms. Shannon L. Watson, Senior Advisor
to the Associate Administrator for Policy, Federal Motor Carrier Safety
Administration, U.S. Department of Transportation, 1200 New Jersey
Avenue SE., Washington, DC 20590,<PHONE_NUMBER><EMAIL_ADDRESS>
Services for Individuals With Disabilities

    For information on facilities or services for individuals with
disabilities or to request special assistance at the meeting, contact
Eran Segev at<PHONE_NUMBER><EMAIL_ADDRESS>by Wednesday, October
22.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

I. Background

MCSAC

    Section 4144 of the Safe, Accountable, Flexible, Efficient
Transportation Equity Act: A Legacy for Users (SAFETEA-LU, Pub. L. 109-
59, 119 Stat. 1144, August 10, 2005) required the Secretary of
Transportation to establish the MCSAC. The Moving Ahead for Progress in
the 21st Century Act (MAP-21, Pub. L. 112-141) reauthorized the MCSAC
through September 30, 2013, at which time its statutory authority
expired, necessitating the establishment of MCSAC as a discretionary
committee under FACA. Secretary Foxx established that effective
September 30, 2013, through September 30, 2015. MCSAC provides advice
and recommendations to the FMCSA Administrator on motor carrier safety
programs and regulations, and operates in accordance with the Federal
Advisory Committee Act (FACA, 5 U.S.C. App 2).

MRB

    The MRB is composed of five medical experts who each serve 2-year
terms. Section 4116 of SAFETEA-LU requires the Secretary of
Transportation, with the advice of the MRB and the chief medical
examiner, to establish, review, and revise ``medical standards for
operators of commercial motor vehicles that will ensure that the
physical condition of operators of commercial motor vehicles is
adequate to enable them to operate the vehicles safely.'' The MRB
operates in accordance with FACA under the terms of its charter, filed
November 25, 2013.

II. Meeting Participation

    Oral comments from the public will be heard during the last half-
hour of the meetings each day. Should all public comments be exhausted
prior to the end of the specified period, the comment period will
close. Members of the public may submit written comments on the topics
to be considered during the meeting by Wednesday, October 22, to
Federal Docket Management System (FDMC) Docket Number FMCSA-2008-0362
for the MRB and FMCSA-2006-26367 for the MCSAC using any of the
following methods:
     Federal eRulemaking Portal: Go to http://www.regulations.gov. Follow the online instructions for submitting
comments.
     Fax:<PHONE_NUMBER>.
     Mail: Docket Management Facility; U.S. Department of
Transportation, 1200 New Jersey Avenue SE., West Building, Room W12-
140, Washington, DC 20590.
     Hand Delivery: U.S. Department of Transportation, 1200 New
Jersey Avenue SE., Room W12-140, Washington, DC, between 9 a.m. and 5
p.m., E.T. Monday through Friday, except Federal holidays.

    Issued on: October 6, 2014.
 Larry W. Minor,
 Associate Administrator for Policy.
[FR Doc. 2014-24364 Filed 10-8-14; 4:15 pm]
BILLING CODE 4910-EX-P


[Federal Register: September 18, 2006 (Volume 71, Number 180)]
[Notices]
[Page 54639]
[DOCID:fr18se06-52]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission

[Docket No. CP06-441-000]

Texas Gas Transmission, LLC; Notice of Application

September 11, 2006.
    Take notice that on September 1, 2006, Texas Gas Transmission, LLC
(Texas Gas), 3800 Frederica Street, Owensboro, Kentucky 42301, filed in
Docket No. CP06-441-000, an application pursuant to section 7 of the
Natural Gas Act (NGA) for authorization to lease 62,180 dekatherms per
day (Dth/day) of capacity from Gulf South Pipeline Company, LP (Gulf
South), all as more fully set forth in the application which is on file
with the Commission and open to public inspection. In a related
application filed in Docket No. CP06-446-000, Gulf South seeks
authorization to construct, own and operate facilities capable of
providing the leased capacity. The instant filing may be also viewed on
the web at http://www.ferc.gov using the ``eLibrary'' link. Enter the

docket number excluding the last three digits in the docket number
field to access the document. For assistance, call<PHONE_NUMBER> or
TTY,<PHONE_NUMBER>.
    Any questions concerning this application may be directed to Kathy
D. Fort, Manager of Certificates and Tariffs, Texas Gas Transmission,
LLC, P.O. Box 20008, Owensboro, Kentucky 42304.
    There are two ways to become involved in the Commission's review of
this project. First, any person wishing to obtain legal status by
becoming a party to the proceedings for this project should, before the
comment date of this notice, file with the Federal Energy Regulatory
Commission, 888 First Street, NE., Washington, DC 20426, a motion to
intervene in accordance with the requirements of the Commission's Rules
of Practice and Procedure (18 CFR 385.214 or 385.211) and the
Regulations under the NGA (18 CFR 157.10). A person obtaining party
status will be placed on the service list maintained by the Secretary
of the Commission and will receive copies of all documents filed by the
applicant and by all other parties. A party must submit 14 copies of
filings made with the Commission and must mail a copy to the applicant
and to every other party in the proceeding. Only parties to the
proceeding can ask for court review of Commission orders in the
proceeding.
    However, a person does not have to intervene in order to have
comments considered. The second way to participate is by filing with
the Secretary of the Commission, as soon as possible, an original and
two copies of comments in support of or in opposition to this project.
The Commission will consider these comments in determining the
appropriate action to be taken, but the filing of a comment alone will
not serve to make the filer a party to the proceeding. The Commission's
rules require that persons filing comments in opposition to the project
provide copies of their protests only to the party or parties directly
involved in the protest.
    Comments, protests and interventions may be filed electronically
via the Internet in lieu of paper. See, 18 CFR 385.2001(a)(1)(iii) and
the instructions on the Commission's web site under the ``e-Filing''
link.
    Comment Date: 5 p.m. Eastern Time on October 2, 2006.

Magalie R. Salas,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. E6-15389 Filed 9-15-06; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 6717-01-P


[Federal Register: January 22, 2008 (Volume 73, Number 14)]
[Notices]
[Page 3711-3712]
[DOCID:fr22ja08-48]

=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission

Combined Notice of Filings

January 14, 2008.
    Take notice that the Commission has received the following Natural
Gas Pipeline Rate and Refund Report filings:
    Docket Numbers: RP96-320-079.
    Applicants: Gulf South Pipeline Company, LP.
    Description: Gulf South Pipeline Co, LP submits an interim
negotiated rate letter agreement re East Texas to Mississippi Expansion
Project.
    Filed Date: 01/10/2008.
    Accession Number: 20080111-0080.
    Comment Date: 5 p.m. Eastern Time on Tuesday, January 22, 2008.

    Docket Numbers: RP97-81-045.
    Applicants: Kinder Morgan Interstate Gas Transmission.
    Description: Kinder Morgan Interstate Gas Transmission LLC submits
Nineteenth Revised Sheet 4G.01 et al to FERC Gas Tariff, Fourth Revised
Volume 1-A, effective 1/12/08.
    Filed Date: 01/11/2008.
    Accession Number: 20080114-0246.
    Comment Date: 5 p.m. Eastern Time on Wednesday, January 23, 2008.

    Docket Numbers: RP08-49-001.
    Applicants: Midwestern Gas Transmission Company.
    Description: Midwestern Gas Transmission Company submits

Substitute Third Revised Sheet 90, proposed to be effective 1/7/08.
    Filed Date: 01/11/2008.
    Accession Number: 20080114-0038.
    Comment Date: 5 p.m. Eastern Time on Wednesday, January 23, 2008.

    Docket Numbers: RP08-159-000.
    Applicants: Crossroads Pipeline Company.
    Description: Crossroads Pipeline Company submits First Revised
Sheet 78A to FERC Gas Tariff, Second Revised Volume 1, to be effective
2/10/08.
    Filed Date: 01/11/2008.
    Accession Number: 20080114-0135.
    Comment Date: 5 p.m. Eastern Time on Wednesday, January 23, 2008.

    Docket Numbers: RP08-160-000.
    Applicants: Columbia Gulf Transmission Company.
    Description: Columbia Gulf Transmission Company submits Ninth
Revised Sheet 144 to FERC Gas Tariff, Second Revised Volume 1, to be
effective 2/10/08.
    Filed Date: 01/11/2008.
    Accession Number: 20080114-0136.
    Comment Date: 5 p.m. Eastern Time on Wednesday, January 23, 2008.

    Docket Numbers: RP08-161-000.
    Applicants: Columbia Gas Transmission Corporation.
    Description: Columbia Gas Transmission Corporation submits Eleventh
Revised Sheet 280 to FERC Gas Tariff, Second Revised Volume 1, to be
effective 2/10/08.
    Filed Date: 01/11/2008.
    Accession Number: 20080114-0137.
    Comment Date: 5 p.m. Eastern Time on Wednesday, January 23, 2008.
    Any person desiring to intervene or to protest in any of the above
proceedings must file in accordance with Rules 211 and 214 of the
Commission's Rules of Practice and Procedure (18 CFR 385.211 and
385.214) on or before 5 p.m. Eastern time on the specified comment
date. It is not necessary to separately intervene again in a subdocket
related to a compliance filing if you have previously intervened in the
same docket. Protests will be considered by the Commission in
determining the appropriate action to be taken, but will not serve to
make protestants parties to the proceeding. Anyone filing a motion to
intervene or protest must serve a copy of that document on the
Applicant. In reference to filings initiating a new proceeding,
interventions or protests submitted on or before the comment deadline
need not be served on persons other than the Applicant.
    The Commission encourages electronic submission of protests and
interventions in lieu of paper, using the FERC Online links at http://www.ferc.gov.
 To facilitate electronic service, persons with Internet

access who will eFile a document and/or be listed as a contact for an
intervenor must create and validate an eRegistration account using the
eRegistration link. Select the eFiling link to log on and submit the
intervention or protests.
    Persons unable to file electronically should submit an original and
14 copies of the intervention or protest to the Federal Energy
Regulatory Commission, 888 First St., NE., Washington, DC 20426.
    The filings in the above proceedings are accessible in the
Commission's eLibrary system by clicking on the appropriate link in the
above list. They are also available for review in the Commission's
Public Reference Room in Washington, DC. There is an eSubscription link
on the Web site that enables subscribers to receive e-mail notification
when a document is added to a subscribed dockets(s). For assistance
with any FERC Online service, please e-mail<EMAIL_ADDRESS>
or call<PHONE_NUMBER> (toll free). For TTY, call<PHONE_NUMBER>.

Nathaniel J. Davis, Sr.,
Deputy Secretary.
 [FR Doc. E8-980 Filed 1-18-08; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 6717-01-P