[Federal Register Volume 80, Number 203 (Wednesday, October 21, 2015)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Pages 63678-63680]
[FR Doc No: 2015-26754]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY

Coast Guard

33 CFR Part 165

[Docket Number USCG-2015-0570]
RIN 1625-AA00

Safety Zone; 520 Bridge Construction, Lake Washington, Seattle,
WA

AGENCY: Coast Guard, DHS.

ACTION: Temporary final rule.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Coast Guard is establishing a temporary safety zone on
Lake Washington around the east span of the 520 Bridge in Seattle,
Washington due to ongoing construction. The safety zone is necessary to
ensure the safety of the maritime public and workers involved in the
bridge construction when construction barges are located in the east
span of the bridge. The safety zone will prohibit any person or vessel
from entering or remaining in the safety zone unless authorized by the
Captain of the Port or his Designated Representative.

DATES: This rule is effective without actual notice from October 21,
2015 through November 30, 2015. For the purposes of enforcement, actual
notice will be used from October 2, 2015 until October 21, 2015.

ADDRESSES: To view documents mentioned in this preamble as being
available in the docket, go to http://www.regulations.gov, type USCG-
2015-0570 in the ``SEARCH'' box and click ``SEARCH.'' Click on Open
Docket Folder on the line associated with this rule.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: If you have questions on this rule,
call or email Ryan Griffin, Waterways Management Division, Coast Guard
Sector Puget Sound; telephone<PHONE_NUMBER>, email
<EMAIL_ADDRESS>
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

I. Table of Abbreviations

CFR Code of Federal Regulations
DHS Department of Homeland Security
E.O. Executive order
FR Federal Register
NPRM Notice of proposed rulemaking
Pub. L. Public Law
Sec.  Section
U.S.C. United States Code

II. Background Information and Regulatory History

    The Coast Guard is issuing this temporary rule without prior notice
and opportunity to comment pursuant to authority under section 4(a) of
the Administrative Procedure Act (APA) (5 U.S.C. 553(b)). This
provision authorizes an agency to issue a rule without prior notice and
opportunity to comment when the agency for good cause finds that those
procedures are ``impracticable, unnecessary, or contrary to the public
interest.'' Under 5 U.S.C. 553(b)(B), the Coast Guard finds that good
cause exists for not publishing a notice of proposed rulemaking (NPRM)
with respect to this rule because of an unexpected extension of
construction. With construction still in progress the safety zone needs
to be extended until November 30, 2015. Due to the nature of the delay
and the need to extend the safety zone immediately, it would be
impracticable to issue an NPRM and solicit comment before finalizing
this rule.
    We are issuing this rule, and under 5 U.S.C. 553(d)(3), the Coast
Guard finds that good cause exists for making it effective less than 30
days after publication in the Federal Register. Delaying the effective
date of this rule would be contrary to public interest because
immediate action is needed to respond to the potential safety hazards
associated with the construction of the east span of the 520 Bridge.

III. Legal Authority and Need for Rule

    The Coast Guard is issuing this rule under authority in 33 U.S.C.
1231. The Captain of the Port Puget sound (COTP) has determined that
potential hazards associated with bridge construction continuing on
October 2, 2015 will be a safety concern for anyone within a 100-yard
radius of the 520 Bridge east span construction operations. This rule
is needed to protect personnel, vessels, and the marine environment in
the navigable waters within the safety zone while the bridge is being
repaired.

IV. Discussion of the Rule

    The safety zone established in this rule encompasses all waters
within 100 yards of the east span of the 520 Bridge, located on Lake
Washington and is effective from October 2, 2015 through November 30,
2015 when a construction barge is present in the safety zone. Vessels
wishing to enter the safety zone must request permission to do so from
the Captain of the Port by contacting the Joint Harbor Operations
Center at<PHONE_NUMBER> or VHF Channel 16. If permission for entry is
granted, vessels must proceed at a minimum speed for safe navigation.

V. Regulatory Analyses

    We developed this rule after considering numerous statutes and

executive orders (E.O.s) related to rulemaking. Below we summarize our
analyses based on a number of these statutes and E.O.s, and we discuss
First Amendment rights of protestors.

A. Regulatory Planning and Review

    E.O.s 12866 and 13563 direct agencies to assess the costs and
benefits of available regulatory alternatives and, if regulation is
necessary, to select regulatory approaches that maximize net benefits.
E.O. 13563 emphasizes the importance of quantifying both costs and
benefits, of reducing costs, of harmonizing rules, and of promoting
flexibility. This rule has not been designated a ``significant
regulatory action,'' under E.O. 12866. Accordingly, it has not been
reviewed by the Office of Management and Budget.
    This rule is not a significant regulatory action as the safety zone
established by it is both limited in size and duration and there is an
alternative route for vessels with an air draft that permits safe
passage under the west span of the bridge.

B. Impact on Small Entities

    The Regulatory Flexibility Act of 1980, 5 U.S.C. 601-612, as
amended, requires Federal agencies to consider the potential impact of
regulations on small entities during rulemaking. The term ``small
entities'' comprises small businesses, not-for-profit organizations
that are independently owned and operated and are not dominant in their
fields, and governmental jurisdictions with populations of less than
50,000. The Coast Guard certifies under 5 U.S.C. 605(b) that this rule
will not have a significant economic impact on a substantial number of
small entities.
    While some owners or operators of vessels intending to transit the
safety zone may be small entities, for the reasons stated in section
V.A above, this rule will not have a significant economic impact on any
vessel owner or operator, because the zone established in this rule is
limited in size and duration and there is an alternative route for
vessels with an air draft that permits safe passage under the west span
of the bridge.
    Under section 213(a) of the Small Business Regulatory Enforcement
Fairness Act of 1996 (Pub. L. 104-121), we want to assist small
entities in understanding this rule. If the rule would affect your
small business, organization, or governmental jurisdiction and you have
questions concerning its provisions or options for compliance, please
contact the person listed in the FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT
section.
    Small businesses may send comments on the actions of Federal
employees who enforce, or otherwise determine compliance with, Federal
regulations to the Small Business and Agriculture Regulatory
Enforcement Ombudsman and the Regional Small Business Regulatory
Fairness Boards. The Ombudsman evaluates these actions annually and
rates each agency's responsiveness to small business. If you wish to
comment on actions by employees of the Coast Guard, call 1-888-REG-FAIR
(1-888-734-3247). The Coast Guard will not retaliate against small
entities that question or complain about this rule or any policy or
action of the Coast Guard.

C. Collection of Information

    This rule will not call for a new collection of information under
the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 (44 U.S.C. 3501-3520).

D. Federalism and Indian Tribal Governments

    A rule has implications for federalism under E.O. 13132,
Federalism, if it has a substantial direct effect on the States, on the
relationship between the national government and the States, or on the
distribution of power and responsibilities among the various levels of
government. We have analyzed this rule under that Order and have
determined that it is consistent with the fundamental federalism
principles and preemption requirements described in E.O. 13132.
    Also, this rule does not have tribal implications under E.O. 13175,
Consultation and Coordination with Indian Tribal Governments, because
it does not have a substantial direct effect on one or more Indian
tribes, on the relationship between the Federal Government and Indian
tribes, or on the distribution of power and responsibilities between
the Federal Government and Indian tribes. If you believe this rule has
implications for federalism or Indian tribes, please contact the person
listed in the FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT section above.

E. Unfunded Mandates Reform Act

    The Unfunded Mandates Reform Act of 1995 (2 U.S.C. 1531-1538)
requires Federal agencies to assess the effects of their discretionary
regulatory actions. In particular, the Act addresses actions that may
result in the expenditure by a State, local, or tribal government, in
the aggregate, or by the private sector of $100,000,000 (adjusted for
inflation) or more in any one year. Though this rule will not result in
such an expenditure, we do discuss the effects of this rule elsewhere
in this preamble.

F. Environment

    We have analyzed this rule under Department of Homeland Security
Management Directive 023-01 and Commandant Instruction M16475.lD, which
guide the Coast Guard in complying with the National Environmental
Policy Act of 1969(42 U.S.C. 4321-4370f), and have determined that this
action is one of a category of actions that do not individually or
cumulatively have a significant effect on the human environment. This
rule involves a temporary safety zone lasting less than 60 days that
will prohibit entry within 100 yards of the east span of the 520 bridge
during times of construction operations. It is categorically excluded
from further review under paragraph 34(g) of Figure 2-1 of the
Commandant Instruction. An environmental analysis checklist supporting
this determination and a Categorical Exclusion Determination are
available in the docket where indicated under ADDRESSES. We seek any
comments or information that may lead to the discovery of a significant
environmental impact from this rule.

G. Protest Activities

    The Coast Guard respects the First Amendment rights of protesters.
Protesters are asked to contact the person listed in the FOR FURTHER
INFORMATION CONTACT section to coordinate protest activities so that
your message can be received without jeopardizing the safety or
security of people, places or vessels.

List of Subjects in 33 CFR Part 165

    Harbors, Marine safety, Navigation (water), Reporting and
Recordkeeping requirements, Security measures, Waterways.

    For the reasons discussed in the preamble, the Coast Guard amends
33 CFR part 165 as follows:

PART 165--REGULATED NAVIGATION AREAS AND LIMITED ACCESS AREAS

0
1. The authority citation for part 165 continues to read as follows:

    Authority:  33 U.S.C. 1231; 50 U.S.C. 191; 33 CFR 1.05-1, 6.04-
1, 6.04-6, and 160.5; Department of Homeland Security Delegation No.
0170.1.

0
2. Add Sec.  165.T13-290 to read as follows:

Sec.  165.T13-290  Safety Zone; 520 Bridge, Lake Washington; Seattle,
WA.

    (a) Location: The following area is designated as a safety zone:
All waters within 100 yards of the east span of the 520 Bridge located
on Lake Washington in Seattle, Washington.
    (b) Regulations: In accordance with the general regulations in 33
CFR 165, Subpart C, no person may enter the safety zone or bring or
cause to be brought any vessel into the safety zone without permission
of the Captain of the Port. Persons wishing to enter the safety zone
must request permission from the Captain of the Port by contacting the
Joint Harbor Operation Center at<PHONE_NUMBER> or VHF Channel 16. If
permission for entry is granted, vessels must proceed at a minimum
speed for safe navigation.
    (c) Dates: This rule is effective from October 2, 2015, through
November 30, 2015, when a construction barge is present inside the
safety zone.

    Dated: September 30, 2015.
M.W. Raymond,
Captain, U.S. Coast Guard, Captain of the Port Puget Sound.
[FR Doc. 2015-26754 Filed 10-20-15; 8:45 am]
 BILLING CODE 9110-04P


UNITED STATES OF AMERICA

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION

OFFICE OF THE SECRETARY

WASHINGTON, DC

Issued by the Department of Transportation on August 16, 2002

                     NOTICE OF ACTION TAKEN -- DOCKET OST-1997-2419

________________________________________________________________________
______

This serves as notice to the public of the action described below, taken
by the Department official indicated (no additional confirming order
will be issued in this matter).

Application of   American Airlines, Inc.  filed  7/31/02 for:

XX  Amend its exemption under 49 U.S.C. 40109 to provide the following
service:

Scheduled foreign air transportation of persons, property and mail
between a point or points in the United States and Campo Grande,
Londrina, and Maceio, Brazil.  American also seeks the right to
integrate this requested authority with its existing certificate and
exemption authority.  American states that it will serve these points
under its code-share arrangement with TAM-Lineas Aereas, S.A.

Applicant rep.: Carl B. Nelson, Jr.<PHONE_NUMBER> DOT analyst:  Linda
Senese<PHONE_NUMBER>

DISPOSITION

XX  Granted,  subject to conditions (see below)

The above action was effective when taken:  August 16, 2002, through
August 16, 2004.

XX  Action taken by:	Paul L. Gretch, Director

			Office of International Aviation

XX  The authority requested is consistent with the U.S.-Brazil Air
Transport Agreement, as amended.

Except to the extent exempted or waived, this authority is subject to
the terms, conditions, and limitations indicated:

	XX  Holder’s Certificates of Public Convenience and Necessity

	XX  Standard exemption conditions (attached)

________________________________________________________________________
______

Conditions:  The route integration authority granted is subject to the
condition that any service provided under this exemption shall be
consistent with all applicable agreements between the United States and
the foreign countries involved, and further (a) nothing in the award of
the route

(See Reverse Side)

2

integration authority granted should be construed as conferring upon
American rights (including fifth-freedom, intermediate and/or beyond
rights) to serve markets where U.S. carrier entry is limited unless
American notifies the Department of its intent to serve such a market
and unless and until the Department has completed any necessary carrier
selection procedures to determine which carrier(s) should be authorized
to exercise such rights, and (b) should there be a request by any
carrier to use the limited-entry route rights that are included in
American’s authority by virtue of the route integration exemption
granted here, but that are not then being used by American, the holding
of such authority by virtue of route integration will not be considered
as providing American a preference in a competitive carrier selection
proceeding to determine which carrier(s) should be entitled to use the
authority at issue.

________________________________________________________________________
______

Under the authority assigned by the Department in its regulations, 14
CFR Part 385, we found that (1) our action was consistent with
Department policy; (2) grant of the authority was consistent with the
public interest; and (3) grant of the authority would not constitute a
major regulatory action under the Energy Policy and Conservation Act of
1975.  To the extent not granted, we denied all requests in the
referenced Docket.  We may amend, modify, or revoke the action taken in
this Notice at any time without hearing at our discretion.

Persons entitled to petition the Department for review of the action set
forth in this Notice under the Department’s regulations, 14 CFR
§385.30, may file their petitions within seven (7) days after the date
of issuance of this Notice.  This action was effective when taken, and
the filing of a petition for review will not alter such effectiveness.

An electronic version of this document is available on the World Wide
Web at:

  HYPERLINK "http://dms.dot.gov//reports/reports_aviation.asp"
http://dms.dot.gov//reports/reports_aviation.asp

								      Attachment

U.S. CARRIER

Standard Exemption Conditions

In the conduct of operations authorized by the attached notice, the
applicant(s) shall:

(1)  Hold at all times effective operating authority from the government
of each country served;

(2)  Comply with applicable requirements concerning oversales contained
in 14 CFR 250 (for scheduled operations, if authorized);

(3)  Comply with the requirements for reporting data contained in 14 CFR
241;

(4)  Comply with requirements for minimum insurance coverage, and for
certifying that coverage to the Department, contained in 14 CFR 205;

(5)  Except as specifically exempted or otherwise provided for in a
Department Order, comply with the requirements of 14 CFR 203, concerning
waiver of Warsaw Convention liability limits and defenses;

(6)  Comply with the applicable requirements of the Federal Aviation
Administration Regulations and with all U.S. Government requirements
concerning security; and

(7)  Comply with such other reasonable terms, conditions, and
limitations required by the public interest as may be prescribed by the
Department of Transportation, with all applicable orders and regulations
of other U.S. agencies and courts, and with all applicable laws of the
United States.

The authority granted shall be effective only during the period when the
holder is in compliance with the conditions imposed above.


[Federal Register Volume 83, Number 179 (Friday, September 14, 2018)]
[Notices]
[Page 46768]
[FR Doc No: 2018-20179]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

Sunshine Act Meetings

TIME AND DATE: Notice is hereby given, pursuant to the provisions of
the Government in the Sunshine Act, Public Law 94-409, that a public
roundtable will be held in Baltimore, MD on Thursday, September 20,
2018 from 6:00-7:30 p.m. (ET).

PLACE: The roundtable will be held at the Reginald F. Lewis Museum of
Maryland African American History & Culture, 830 E Pratt Street,
Baltimore, MD 21202.

STATUS: The roundtable will be open to the public. Seating for public
observers will be on a first-come, first-served basis. Doors will open
at 5:30 p.m. and the event will begin at 6:00 p.m. Visitors will be
subject to security checks. A transcript of the roundtable will be made
available in the comment file for the Commission's proposed rulemaking
package regarding the standards of conduct for investment
professionals.

MATTERS TO BE CONSIDERED: On April 18, 2018, the Commission voted to
propose a package of rulemakings and interpretations designed to
enhance the quality and transparency of investors' relationships with
investment advisers and broker-dealers while preserving access to a
variety of types of advice relationships and investment products. On
April 24, 2018, Chairman Jay Clayton issued a statement announcing that
he had asked SEC staff to put together a series of roundtables focused
on the retail investor to be held in different cities across the
country. The roundtables are intended to gather information directly
from those investors most affected by the Commission's rulemaking.
    The Baltimore roundtable is open to the public. This Sunshine Act
notice is being issued because a quorum of the Commission may attend
the roundtable.
    The agenda for the meeting includes a discussion with Chairman
Clayton, Commissioners Kara Stein, Robert Jackson and Elad Roisman, and
senior SEC staff regarding the Commission's proposed Regulation Best
Interest and the proposed restriction on the use of certain names or
titles; a discussion regarding the Commission's proposed Form CRS
Relationship Summary, including effective disclosure and design.

CONTACT PERSON FOR MORE INFORMATION: For further information, please
contact Brent J. Fields from the Office of the Secretary at (202) 551-
5400.

    Dated: September 12, 2018.
Brent J. Fields,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2018-20179 Filed 9-12-18; 4:15 pm]
BILLING CODE 8011-01-P


[Federal Register Volume 76, Number 18 (Thursday, January 27, 2011)]
[Notices]
[Page 4917]
[FR Doc No: 2011-1757]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES

Food and Drug Administration

[Docket No. FDA-2010-N-0084]

Agency Information Collection Activities; Announcement of Office
of Management and Budget Approval; Pretesting of Tobacco Communications

AGENCY: Food and Drug Administration, HHS.

ACTION: Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Food and Drug Administration (FDA) is announcing that a
collection of information entitle ``Pretesting of Tobacco
Communications'' has been approved by the Office of Management and
Budget (OMB) under the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Jonna Capezzuto, Office of Information
Management, Food and Drug Administration, 1350 Piccard Dr., PI50-400B,
Rockville, MD 20850,<PHONE_NUMBER>, e-mail:
<EMAIL_ADDRESS>
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: In the Federal Register of August 6, 2010
(75 FR 47600), the Agency announced that the proposed information
collection had been submitted to OMB for review and clearance under 44
U.S.C. 3507. An Agency may not conduct or sponsor, and a person is not
required to respond to, a collection of information unless it displays
a currently valid OMB control number. OMB has now approved the
information collection and has assigned OMB control number 0910-0674.
The approval expires on January 31, 2013. A copy of the supporting
statement for this information collection is available on the Internet
at http://www.reginfo.gov/public/do/PRAMain.

    Dated: January 21, 2011.
Leslie Kux,
Acting Assistant Commissioner for Policy.
[FR Doc. 2011-1757 Filed 1-26-11; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4160-01-P


[Federal Register Volume 84, Number 92 (Monday, May 13, 2019)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Pages 20774-20776]
[FR Doc No: 2019-09701]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION

Federal Aviation Administration

14 CFR Part 71

[Docket No. FAA-2019-0041; Airspace Docket No. 19-AGL-6]
RIN 2120-AA66

Amendment of Class E Airspace; Mount Vernon, IL

AGENCY: Federal Aviation Administration (FAA), DOT.

ACTION: Final rule.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: This action modifies the Class E surface area and Class E
airspace extending upward from 700 feet above the surface at Mount
Vernon Airport, Mount Vernon, IL. This action is due to an airspace
review caused by the decommissioning of the Mount Vernon VHF
omnidirectional range (VOR), which provided navigation information to
the instrument procedures at this airport, as part of the VOR Minimum
Operational Network (MON) Program. The geographic coordinates and name
of the airport are also being updated to coincide with the FAA's
aeronautical database. Airspace redesign is necessary for the safety
and management of instrument flight rules (IFR) operations at this
airport.

DATES: Effective 0901 UTC, August 15, 2019. The Director of the Federal
Register approves this incorporation by reference action under Title 1
Code of Federal Regulations part 51, subject to the annual revision of
FAA Order 7400.11 and publication of conforming amendments.

ADDRESSES: FAA Order 7400.11C, Airspace Designations and Reporting
Points, and subsequent amendments can be viewed online at http://www.faa.gov/air_traffic/publications/. For further information, you can
contact the Airspace Policy Group, Federal Aviation Administration, 800
Independence Avenue SW, Washington, DC 20591; telephone: (202) 267-
8783. The Order is also available for inspection at the National
Archives and Records Administration (NARA). For information on the
availability of FAA Order 7400.11C at NARA, call<PHONE_NUMBER>, or go
to https://www.archives.gov/federal-register/cfr/ibr-locations.html.
    FAA Order 7400.11, Airspace Designations and Reporting Points, is
published yearly and effective on September 15.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Jeffrey Claypool, Federal Aviation
Administration, Operations Support Group, Central Service Center, 10101
Hillwood Parkway, Fort Worth, TX 76177; telephone<PHONE_NUMBER>.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

Authority for This Rulemaking

    The FAA's authority to issue rules regarding aviation safety is
found in Title 49 of the United States Code. Subtitle I, Section 106
describes the authority of the FAA Administrator. Subtitle VII,
Aviation Programs, describes in more detail the scope of the agency's
authority. This rulemaking is promulgated under the authority described
in Subtitle VII, Part A, Subpart I, Section 40103. Under that section,
the FAA is charged with prescribing regulations to assign the use of
airspace necessary to ensure the safety of aircraft and the efficient
use of airspace. This regulation is within the scope of that authority
as it amends the Class E surface area and Class E airspace extending
upward from 700 feet above the surface at Mount Vernon Airport, Mount
Vernon, IL, to support IFR operations at this airport.

History

    The FAA published a notice of proposed rulemaking in the Federal
Register (84 FR 6708; February 28, 2019) for Docket No. FAA-2019-0041
to amend the Class E surface area and Class E airspace extending upward
from 700 feet above the surface at Mount Vernon Airport, Mount Vernon,
IL. Interested parties were invited to participate in this rulemaking
effort by submitting written comments on the proposal to the FAA. One
comment was received supporting this action. No response is provided.
    Class E airspace designations are published in paragraph 6002 and
6005 of FAA Order 7400.11C, dated August 13, 2018, and effective
September 15, 2018, which is incorporated by reference in 14 CFR 71.1.
The Class E airspace designations listed in this document will be
published subsequently in the Order.

Availability and Summary of Documents for Incorporation by Reference

    This document amends FAA Order 7400.11C, Airspace Designations and
Reporting Points, dated August 13, 2018, and effective September 15,
2018. FAA Order 7400.11C is publicly available as listed in the
ADDRESSES section of this document. FAA Order 7400.11C lists Class A,
B, C, D, and E airspace areas, air traffic service routes, and
reporting points.

The Rule

    This amendment to Title 14 Code of Federal Regulations (14 CFR)
part 71 by:
    Modifying the Class E surface area to within a 4.1-mile radius
(reduced from a 4.2-mile radius) at Mount Vernon Airport, Mount Vernon,
IL, and removing the Mount Vernon VOR/DME and the associate extension
from the airspace legal description;
    And modifying the Class E airspace extending upward from 700 feet
above the surface at Mount Vernon Airport, Mount Vernon, IL, by
removing the Mount Vernon VOR/DME and the associated extension from the
airspace legal description; and by updating the name of the airport
(formerly Mount Vernon/Outland Airport) and the geographic coordinates
of the airport to coincide with the FAA's aeronautical database.
    This action is due to an airspace review caused by the
decommissioning of the Mount Vernon VOR, which provided navigation
information for the instrument procedures at these airports, as part of
the VOR MON Program.

Regulatory Notices and Analyses

    The FAA has determined that this regulation only involves an
established body of technical regulations for which frequent and
routine amendments are necessary to keep them operationally current, is
non-controversial and unlikely to result in adverse or negative
comments. It, therefore: (1) Is not a ``significant regulatory action''
under Executive Order 12866; (2) is not a ``significant rule'' under
DOT Regulatory Policies and Procedures (44 FR 11034; February 26,
1979); and (3) does not warrant preparation of a regulatory evaluation
as the anticipated impact is so minimal. Since this is a routine matter
that only affects air traffic procedures and air navigation, it is
certified that this rule, when promulgated, does not have a significant
economic impact on a substantial number of small entities under the
criteria of the Regulatory Flexibility Act.

Environmental Review

    The FAA has determined that this action qualifies for categorical
exclusion under the National Environmental Policy Act in accordance
with FAA Order 1050.1F, ``Environmental Impacts: Policies and
Procedures,'' paragraph 5-6.5.a. This airspace action is not expected
to cause any potentially significant environmental impacts, and no
extraordinary circumstances exist that warrant preparation of an
environmental assessment.

Lists of Subjects in 14 CFR Part 71

    Airspace, Incorporation by reference, Navigation (air).

Adoption of the Amendment

    In consideration of the foregoing, the Federal Aviation
Administration amends 14 CFR part 71 as follows:

PART 71--DESIGNATION OF CLASS A, B, C, D, AND E AIRSPACE AREAS; AIR
TRAFFIC SERVICE ROUTES; AND REPORTING POINTS

0
1. The authority citation for part 71 continues to read as follows:

    Authority:  49 U.S.C. 106(f), 106(g); 40103, 40113, 40120; E.O.
10854, 24 FR 9565, 3 CFR, 1959-1963 Comp., p. 389.

Sec.  71.1  [Amended]

0
2. The incorporation by reference in 14 CFR 71.1 of FAA Order 7400.11C,
Airspace Designations and Reporting Points, dated August 13, 2018, and
effective September 15, 2018, is amended as follows:

Paragraph 6002 Class E Airspace Areas Designated as Surface Areas.

* * * * *

AGL IL E2 Mount Vernon, IL [Amended]

Mount Vernon Airport, IL
    (Lat. 38[deg]19'24'' N, long. 88[deg]51'31'' W)

    Within a 4.1-mile radius of Mount Vernon Airport.

Paragraph 6005 Class E Airspace Areas Extending Upward From 700
Feet or More Above the Surface of the Earth.

* * * * *

AGL IL E5 Mount Vernon, IL [Amended]

Mount Vernon Airport, IL
    (Lat. 38[deg]19'24'' N, long. 88[deg]51'31'' W)

    That airspace extending upward from 700 feet above the surface
within a 6.6-mile radius of Mount Vernon Airport.

    Issued in Fort Worth, Texas, on May 6, 2019.
John A. Witucki,
Acting Manager, Operations Support Group, ATO Central Service Center.
[FR Doc. 2019-09701 Filed 5-10-19; 8:45 am]
 BILLING CODE 4910-13-P


[Federal Register Volume 83, Number 62 (Friday, March 30, 2018)]
[Notices]
[Pages 13792-13793]
[FR Doc No: 2018-06526]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF LABOR

Occupational Safety and Health Administration

[Docket No. OSHA-2011-0125]

On-Site Consultation Programs; Extension of the Office of
Management and Budget's (OMB) Approval of Information Collection
(Paperwork) Requirements

AGENCY: Occupational Safety and Health Administration (OSHA), Labor.

ACTION: Request for public comments.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: OSHA solicits public comments concerning its proposal to
extend OMB approval of the information collection requirements
contained in the regulations addressing On-Site Consultation Programs.

DATES: Comments must be submitted (postmarked, sent, or received) by
May 29, 2018.

ADDRESSES:
    Electronically: You may submit comments and attachments
electronically at http://www.regulations.gov, which is the Federal
eRulemaking Portal. Follow the instructions online for submitting
comments.
    Facsimile: If your comments, including attachments, are not longer
than 10 pages you may fax them to the OSHA Docket Office at (202) 693-
1648.
    Mail, hand delivery, express mail, messenger, or courier service:
When using this method, you must submit a copy of your comments and
attachments to the OSHA Docket Office, Docket No. OSHA-2011-0125,
Occupational Safety and Health Administration, U.S. Department of
Labor, Room N-3653, 200 Constitution Avenue NW, Washington, DC 20210.
Deliveries (hand, express mail, messenger, and courier service) are
accepted during the OSHA Docket Office's normal business hours, 10:00
a.m. to 3:00 p.m., ET.
    Instructions: All submissions must include the Agency name and the
OSHA docket number (OSHA-2011-0125) for the Information Collection
Request (ICR). All comments, including any personal information you
provide, are placed in the public docket without change, and may be
made available online at http://www.regulations.gov. For further
information on submitting comments, see the ``Public Participation''
heading in the section of this notice titled SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION.
    Docket: To read or download comments or other material in the
docket, go to http://www.regulations.gov or the OSHA Docket Office at
the address above. All documents in the docket (including this Federal
Register notice) are listed in the http://www.regulations.gov index;
however, some information (e.g., copyrighted material) is not publicly
available to read or download through the website. All submissions,
including copyrighted material, are available for inspection and
copying at the OSHA Docket Office. You may also contact Patrick
Showalter at<PHONE_NUMBER> to obtain a copy of the ICR.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Patrick Showalter, Director, Office of
Small Business Assistance, Directorate of Cooperative and State
Programs, OSHA, U.S. Department of Labor, telephone<PHONE_NUMBER>.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

I. Background

    The Department of Labor, as part of its continuing effort to reduce
paperwork and respondent (i.e., employer) burden, conducts a
preclearance process to provide the public with an opportunity to
comment on proposed and continuing information collection requirements
in accordance with the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 (PRA) (44 U.S.C.
3506(c)(2)(A)). This program ensures that information is in the desired
format, reporting burden (time and costs) is minimal, collection
instruments are clearly understood, and OSHA's estimate of the
information collection burden is accurate. The Occupational Safety and
Health Act of 1970 (the OSH Act) (29 U.S.C. 651 et seq.) authorizes
information collection by employers as necessary or appropriate for
enforcement of the OSH Act or for developing information regarding the
causes and prevention of occupational injuries, illnesses, and
accidents (29 U.S.C. 657). The OSH Act also requires OSHA to obtain
such information with minimum burden upon employers, especially those
operating small businesses, and to reduce to the maximum extent
feasible unnecessary duplication of efforts in obtaining information
(29 U.S.C. 657).
    Section 7(c)(1) of the OSH Act authorizes the Secretary of Labor
(Secretary) to, ``with the consent of any State or political
subdivision thereof, accept and use the services, facilities, and
personnel of any agency of such State or subdivision with
reimbursement.'' Section 21(c) of the OSH Act authorizes the Secretary
to ``consult with and advise employers and employees . . . as to
effective means of preventing occupational illnesses and injuries.''
    Additionally, Section 21(d) of the OSH Act instructs the Secretary
to ``establish and support cooperative agreements with the States under
which employers subject to the Act may consult with State personnel
with respect to the application of occupational safety and health
requirements under the Act or under State plans approved under section
18 of the Act.'' This gives the Secretary authority to enter into
agreements with the States to provide On-Site Consultation services,
and establish rules under which employers may qualify for an inspection
exemption. To satisfy the intent of these and other sections of the OSH
Act, OSHA codified the terms that govern cooperative agreements between
OSHA and State governments whereby State agencies provide On-Site
Consultation services to private employers to assist them in complying
with the requirements of the OSH Act. The terms were codified as the
Consultation Program regulations (29 CFR part 1908).
    The On-Site Consultation Program regulations specify services to be
provided, and practices and procedures to be followed by the State On-
Site Consultation Programs. Information collection requirements set
forth in the On-Site Consultation Program regulations are in two
categories: State Responsibilities and Employer Responsibilities. Eight
regulatory provisions require information

collection activities by the State. The Federal government provides 90
percent of the funds for On-Site Consultation services delivered by the
States, which result in the information collection. Four requirements
apply to employers and specify conditions for receiving the free
consultation services.

II. Special Issues for Comment

    OSHA has a particular interest in comments on the following issues:
     Whether the proposed information collection requirements
are necessary for the proper performance of the Agency's functions,
including whether the information is useful;
     The accuracy of OSHA's estimate of the burden (time and
costs) of the information collection requirements, including the
validity of the methodology and assumptions used;
     The quality, utility, and clarity of the information
collected; and
     Ways to minimize the burden on employers who must comply--
for example, by using automated or other technological information
collection and transmission techniques.

III. Proposed Actions

    OSHA is requesting an extension of its current approval of the
collection of information requirements for the regulation. The Agency
is requesting an adjustment decrease of 497 burden hours (from 215,704
to 215,207 hours). While better burden hour and costs estimates for
completing documentation for the ``Safety and Health Program Assessment
Worksheet for Full Service Safety and Health'' increased the burden
hours, this was offset by the decrease in the number of On-Site
Consultation visits.
    In addition, the Agency requests OMB approval to update the Safety
and Health Program Assessment Worksheet, OSHA Form 33, to include minor
edits.
    Type of Review: Extension of a currently approved collection.
    Title: On-Site Consultation Programs (29 CFR part 1908).
    OMB Control Number: 1218-0110.
    Affected Public: Business or other for-profits.
    Number of Respondents: 22,752 (52 State Consultation Programs and
22,700 Employers).
    Frequency: Initial, annual, quarterly, periodic.
    Average Time per Response: Varies.
    Estimated Number of Responses: 94,487.
    Estimated Total Burden Hours: 215,207.
    Estimated Cost (Operation and Maintenance): $0.

IV. Public Participation--Submission of Comments on This Notice and
Internet Access to Comments and Submissions

    You may submit comments in response to this document as follows:
(1) Electronically at http://www.regulations.gov, which is the Federal
eRulemaking Portal; (2) by facsimile (fax); or (3) by hard copy. All
comments, attachments, and other material must identify the Agency name
and the OSHA docket number (Docket No. OSHA-2011-0125) for the ICR. You
may supplement electronic submissions by uploading document files
electronically. If you wish to mail additional materials in reference
to an electronic or facsimile submission, you must submit them to the
OSHA Docket Office (see the section of this notice titled ADDRESSES).
The additional materials must clearly identify your electronic comments
by your name, date, and the docket number so that the Agency can attach
them to your comments.
    Because of security procedures, the use of regular mail may cause a
significant delay in the receipt of comments. For information about
security procedures concerning the delivery of materials by hand,
express delivery, messenger, or courier service, please contact the
OSHA Docket Office at<PHONE_NUMBER>; (TTY<PHONE_NUMBER>).
    Comments and submissions are posted without change at http://www.regulations.gov. Therefore, OSHA cautions commenters about
submitting personal information such as social security numbers and
dates of birth. Although all submissions are listed in the http://www.regulations.gov index, some information (e.g., copyrighted
material) is not publicly available to read or download through this
website. All submissions, including copyrighted material, are available
for inspection and copying at the OSHA Docket Office. Information on
using the http://www.regulations.gov website to submit comments and
access the docket is available at the website's ``User Tips'' link.
Contact the OSHA Docket Office for information about materials not
available through the website, and for assistance in using the internet
to locate docket submissions.

V. Authority and Signature

    Loren Sweatt, Deputy Assistant Secretary of Labor for Occupational
Safety and Health, directed the preparation of this notice. The
authority for this notice is the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 (44
U.S.C. 3506 et seq.) and Secretary of Labor's Order No. 1-2012 (77 FR
3912).

    Signed at Washington, DC, on March 20, 2018.
Loren Sweatt,
Deputy Assistant Secretary of Labor for Occupational Safety and Health.
[FR Doc. 2018-06526 Filed 3-29-18; 8:45 am]
 BILLING CODE 4510-26-P


[Federal Register Volume 78, Number 156 (Tuesday, August 13, 2013)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Page 49116]
[FR Doc No: 2013-19457]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION

Federal Aviation Administration

14 CFR Part 39

[Docket No. FAA-2011-1158; Directorate Identifier 2010-SW-018-AD;
Amendment 39-16847; AD 2011-22-05]
RIN 2120-AA64

Airworthiness Directives; Eurocopter France Helicopters

AGENCY: Federal Aviation Administration (FAA), DOT.

ACTION: Final rule; correction.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The FAA is correcting an airworthiness directive (AD) that was
published in the Federal Register. The AD applies to certain Eurocopter
France (Eurocopter) Model AS350B, B1, B2, B3, BA, C, D, and D1
helicopters; and Model AS355E, F, F1, F2, N, and NP helicopters. The
reference to Title 14, Code of Federal Regulations (14 CFR) 91.173 in
the Compliance section is incorrect. This document corrects that error.
In all other respects, the original document remains the same.

DATES: This final rule is effective August 13, 2013. The effective date
for AD 2011-22-05 (76 FR 70046, November 10, 2011) remains November 25,
2011.

ADDRESSES: You may examine the AD docket on the Internet at http://www.regulations.gov; or in person at the Docket Management Facility
between 9 a.m. and 5 p.m., Monday through Friday, except Federal
holidays. The AD docket contains this AD, the regulatory evaluation,
any comments received, and other information. The address for the
Docket Office (phone:<PHONE_NUMBER>) is Document Management Facility,
U.S. Department of Transportation, Docket Operations, M-30, West
Building Ground Floor, Room W12-140, 1200 New Jersey Avenue SE.,
Washington, DC 20590.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Jim Grigg, Rotorcraft Directorate,
Safety Management Group Manager, FAA, 2601 Meacham Blvd., Fort Worth,
TX 76137; phone:<PHONE_NUMBER>; fax:<PHONE_NUMBER>; email:
<EMAIL_ADDRESS>
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: AD 2011-22-05, Amendment 39-16847 (76 FR
70046, November 10, 2011), applies to certain Eurocopter Model AS350B,
B1, B2, B3, BA, C, D, and D1 and Model AS355E, F, F1, F2, N, and NP
helicopters. AD 2011-22-05 currently requires, in part, a daily check
of the tail rotor pitch control rod (control rod) outboard spherical
bearing (bearing) for play, and allows this check to be performed by a
pilot if certain regulatory recordkeeping requirements are met. As
such, AD 2011-22-05 currently includes the following as the last
sentence under paragraph (a): ``The record must be maintained as
required by 14 CFR 91.173, 121.380, or 134.439.''
    As published, the reference to 14 CFR 91.173 is incorrect. The
correct reference is to 14 CFR 91.417.
    No other part of the preamble or regulatory information has been
changed; therefore, only the changed portion of the final rule is being
published in the Federal Register.

Correction of Regulatory Text

Sec.  39.13  [Corrected]

    In the Federal Register of November 10, 2011, on page 70048, in the
third column, the last sentence of paragraph (a) is corrected to read
as follows:
* * * * *
    The record must be maintained as required by 14 CFR 91.417,
121.380, or 135.439.
* * * * *

    Issued in Fort Worth, Texas, on August 2, 2013.
Lance T. Gant,
Acting Manager, Rotorcraft Directorate, Aircraft Certification Service.
[FR Doc. 2013-19457 Filed 8-12-13; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910-13-P


[Federal Register Volume 77, Number 48 (Monday, March 12, 2012)]
[Notices]
[Page 14517]
[FR Doc No: 2012-5845]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission

[Docket No. CP12-73-000]

Southern Star Central Gas Pipeline, Inc.; Notice of Request Under
Blanket Authorization

    Take notice that on February 21, 2012 Southern Star Central Gas
Pipeline, Inc. (Southern Star), 4700 State Highway 56, Owensboro,
Kentucky 42301, filed in Docket No. CP12-73-000, a Prior Notice request
pursuant to sections 157.205 and 157.216 of the Commission's
Regulations under the Natural Gas Act for authorization to replace
approximately 3 miles of certain pipeline facilities located in Johnson
City, Missouri. Specifically, Southern Star proposes to replace 3 miles
of 12-inch diameter XT pipeline by constructing approximately 3 miles
of 20-inch diameter XM pipeline which is a continuation of the multi-
year program initiated in 2008 to construct the Sedalia 20-inch
diameter XM pipeline. The proposed replacement will allow Southern Star
to meet a requirement from the Department of Transportation for safety
reasons and to eliminate obsolete, acetylene-welded pipeline, all as
more fully set forth in the application which is on file with the
Commission and open to public inspection. The filing may also be viewed
on the Web at http://www.ferc.gov using the ``eLibrary'' link. Enter
the docket number excluding the last three digits in the docket number
field to access the document. For assistance, contact FERC at
<EMAIL_ADDRESS>or call toll-free,<PHONE_NUMBER> or TTY,
(202) 502-8659.
    Any questions regarding this Application should be directed to
Phyllis Medley, Senior Analyst, Regulatory Affairs, Southern Star
Central Gas Pipeline, Inc., 4700 State Highway 56, Owensboro, Kentucky
42301, or call<PHONE_NUMBER>, or fax<PHONE_NUMBER>, or by email
<EMAIL_ADDRESS>    Any person may, within 60 days after the issuance of the instant
notice by the Commission, file pursuant to Rule 214 of the Commission's
Procedural Rules (18 CFR 385.214) a motion to intervene or notice of
intervention. Any person filing to intervene or the Commission's staff
may, pursuant to section 157.205 of the Commission's Regulations under
the NGA (18 CFR 157.205) file a protest to the request. If no protest
is filed within the time allowed therefore, the proposed activity shall
be deemed to be authorized effective the day after the time allowed for
protest. If a protest is filed and not withdrawn within 30 days after
the time allowed for filing a protest, the instant request shall be
treated as an application for authorization pursuant to section 7 of
the NGA.
    Persons who wish to comment only on the environmental review of
this project should submit an original and two copies of their comments
to the Secretary of the Commission. Environmental commenter's will be
placed on the Commission's environmental mailing list, will receive
copies of the environmental documents, and will be notified of meetings
associated with he Commission's environmental review process.
Environmental commenter's will not be required to serve copies of filed
documents on all other parties. However, the non-party commentary, will
not receive copies of all documents filed by other parties or issued by
the Commission (except for the mailing of environmental documents
issued by the Commission) and will not have the right to seek court
review of the Commission's final order.
    The Commission strongly encourages electronic filings of comments,
protests, and interventions via the internet in lieu of paper. See 18
CFR 385.2001(a)(1)(iii) and the instructions on the Commission's Web
site (www.ferc.gov) under the ``e-Filing'' link.

    Dated: March 5, 2012.
Kimberly D. Bose,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2012-5845 Filed 3-9-12; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6717-01-P