[Federal Register Volume 78, Number 164 (Friday, August 23, 2013)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Pages 52422-52423]
[FR Doc No: 2013-20497]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION

Federal Aviation Administration

14 CFR Part 71

[Docket No. FAA-2013-0565; Airspace Docket No. 13-AEA-11]

Amendment of Class D and E Airspace; Wrightstown, NJ

AGENCY: Federal Aviation Administration (FAA), DOT.

ACTION: Final rule, technical amendment.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: This action amends Class D and E Airspace at Wrightstown, NJ,
by updating the geographic coordinates and changing the city identifier
of McGuire Air Force Base (AFB) to aid in the navigation of our
National Airspace System. This action is necessary for the continued
safety and management of instrument flight rules (IFR) operations
within the Wrightstown, NJ airspace area.

DATES: Effective date 0901 UTC, October 17, 2013. The Director of the
Federal Register approves this incorporation by reference action under
Title 1, Code of Federal Regulations part 51, subject to the annual
revision of FAA Order 7400.9 and publication of conforming amendments.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: John Fornito, Operations Support
Group, Eastern Service Center, Federal Aviation Administration, P.O.
Box 20636, Atlanta, Georgia 30320; telephone<PHONE_NUMBER>.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

The Rule

    This amendment to Title 14, Code of Federal Regulations (14 CFR)
part 71 amends Class D airspace and E airspace designated as an
extension to a Class D surface area at McGuire AFB, Wrightstown, NJ, at
the request of FAAs Aeronautical Products. The geographic coordinates
of the airport are updated to be in concert with the FAAs aeronautical
database and the city designation is changed from Wrightstown McGuire
AFB, NJ, to Wrightstown, NJ. Accordingly, since this is an
administrative change, and does not affect the boundaries, altitudes,
or operating requirements of the airspace, notice and public procedures
under 5 U.S.C. 553 (b) are unnecessary.
    The Class D and E airspace designations are published in Paragraph
5000 and 6004 respectively of FAA Order 7400.9W, dated August 8, 2012,
and effective September 15, 2012, which is incorporated by reference in
14 CFR 71.1. The Class D and Class E airspace designations listed in
this document will be published subsequently in the Order.
    The FAA has determined that this regulation only involves an
established body of technical regulations for which frequent and
routine amendments are necessary to keep them, operationally current,
is non-controversial and unlikely to result in adverse or negative
comments. It, therefore, (1) Is not a ``significant regulatory action''
under Executive Order 12866; (2) is not a ``significant rule'' under
DOT Regulatory Policies and Procedures (44 FR 11034; February 26,
1979); and (3) does not warrant preparation of a Regulatory Evaluation
as the anticipated impact is so minimal. Since this is a routine matter
that only affects air traffic procedures and air navigation, it is
certified that this rule, when promulgated, does not have a significant
economic impact on a substantial number of small entities under the
criteria of the Regulatory Flexibility Act.
    The FAA's authority to issue rules regarding aviation safety is
found in Title 49 of the United States Code. Subtitle I, Section 106
describes the authority of the FAA Administrator. Subtitle VII,
Aviation Programs, describes in more detail the scope of the agency's
authority.
    This rulemaking is promulgated under the authority described in
Subtitle VII, Part A. Subpart I, Section 40103. Under that section, the
FAA is charged with prescribing regulations to assign the use of
airspace necessary to ensure the safety of aircraft and the efficient
use of airspace. This regulation is within the scope of that authority
as it amends controlled airspace for the Wrightstown, NJ airspace area.

Environmental Review

    The FAA has determined that this action qualifies for categorical
exclusion under the National Environmental Policy Act in accordance
with FAA Order 1050.1E, ``Environmental Impacts: Policies and
Procedures,'' paragraph 311a. This airspace action is not expected to
cause any potentially significant environmental impacts, and no
extraordinary circumstances exist that warrant preparation of an
environmental assessment.

List of Subjects in 14 CFR Part 71

    Airspace, Incorporation by reference, Navigation (Air).

Adoption of the Amendment

    In consideration of the foregoing, the Federal Aviation
Administration amends 14 CFR Part 71 as follows:

PART 71--DESIGNATION OF CLASS A, B, C, D, AND E AIRSPACE AREAS; AIR
TRAFFIC SERVICE ROUTES; AND REPORTING POINTS

0
1. The authority citation for Part 71 continues to read as follows:

    Authority:  49 U.S.C. 106(g); 40103, 40113, 40120; E.O. 10854,
24 FR 9565, 3 CFR, 1959-1963 Comp., p. 389.

Sec.  71.1  [Amended]

0
2. The incorporation by reference in 14 CFR 71.1 of Federal Aviation
Administration Order 7400.9W, Airspace Designations and Reporting
Points, dated August 8, 2012, effective September 15, 2012, is amended
as follows:

Paragraph 5000 Class D Airspace

* * * * *

AEA NJ D Wrightstown, NJ [Amended]

McGuire AFB, NJ
    (Lat. 40[deg]00'56'' N., long. 74[deg]35'30'' W.)

    That airspace extending upward from the surface to and including
2,600 feet MSL within a 4.5-mile radius of McGuire AFB.

Paragraph 6004 Class E Airspace Designated as an Extension to a
Class D Surface Area.

* * * * *

AEA NJ E4 Wrightstown, NJ [Amended]

McGuire AFB, NJ
    (Lat. 40[deg]00'56'' N., long. 74[deg]35'30'' W.)
McGuire VORTAC
    (Lat. 40[deg]00'34'' N., long. 74[deg]35'47'' W.)

    That airspace extending upward from the surface within 1.8 miles
each side of the McGuire VORTAC 350[deg] radial extending from the
4.5-mile radius of McGuire AFB to 6.1 miles north of the VORTAC and
within 1.8 miles each side of the McGuire VORTAC 051[deg] radial
extending from the 4.5-mile radius of the airport to 6.1 miles
northeast of

the VORTAC and within 1.8 miles each side of the McGuire VORTAC
180[deg] radial extending from the 4.5-mile radius of the airport to
5.2 miles south of the VORTAC and within 1.8 miles each side of the
McGuire AFB ILS localizer southwest course extending from the 4.5-
mile radius of the airport to 7 miles southwest of the localizer.

    Issued in College Park, Georgia, on August 16, 2013.
Kip B. Johns,
Manager, Operations Support Group, Eastern Service Center, Air Traffic
Organization.
[FR Doc. 2013-20497 Filed 8-22-13; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910-13-P


[Federal Register: April 26, 2011 (Volume 76, Number 80)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Page 23169-23171]
[DOCID:fr26ap11-1]

========================================================================
Rules and Regulations
                                                Federal Register
________________________________________________________________________

This section of the FEDERAL REGISTER contains regulatory documents
having general applicability and legal effect, most of which are keyed
to and codified in the Code of Federal Regulations, which is published
under 50 titles pursuant to 44 U.S.C. 1510.

The Code of Federal Regulations is sold by the Superintendent of Documents.
Prices of new books are listed in the first FEDERAL REGISTER issue of each
week.

========================================================================

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION

Federal Aviation Administration

14 CFR Part 39

[Docket No. FAA-2011-0409; Directorate Identifier 2011-CE-011-AD;
Amendment 39-16678; AD 2011-09-16]
RIN 2120-AA64

Airworthiness Directives; DG Flugzeugbau GmbH Glaser-Dirks Model
DG-808C Gliders

AGENCY: Federal Aviation Administration (FAA), DOT.

ACTION: Final rule; request for comments.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: We are adopting a new airworthiness directive (AD) for the
products listed above. This AD results from mandatory continuing
airworthiness information (MCAI) issued by the aviation authority of
another country to identify and correct an unsafe condition on an
aviation product. The MCAI describes the unsafe condition as:

    It has been reported by DG-808 C owners that the bolt at the
landing gear control bellcrank was found mounted in the wrong
direction. Further investigations have shown that in such situation,
the bolt could interfere and damage:

--The air brake control pushrod, and
--The wing flap control pushrod if the landing gear is operated with
negative flap settings.

    This condition, if not detected and corrected, may lead to
reduce the controllability of the powered sailplane.

This AD requires actions that are intended to address the unsafe
condition described in the MCAI.

DATES: This AD becomes effective May 2, 2011.
    On May 2, 2011, the Director of the Federal Register approved the
incorporation by reference of certain publications listed in this AD.
    We must receive comments on this AD by June 10, 2011.

ADDRESSES: You may send comments by any of the following methods:
     Federal eRulemaking Portal: Go to http://
www.regulations.gov. Follow the instructions for submitting comments.
     Fax:<PHONE_NUMBER>.
     Mail: U.S. Department of Transportation, Docket
Operations, M-30, West Building Ground Floor, Room W12-140, 1200 New
Jersey Avenue, SE., Washington, DC 20590.
     Hand Delivery: U.S. Department of Transportation, Docket
Operations, M-30, West Building Ground Floor, Room W12-140, 1200 New
Jersey Avenue, SE., Washington, DC 20590, between 9 a.m. and 5 p.m.,
Monday through Friday, except Federal holidays.
    For service information identified in this AD, contact DG-
Flugzeugbau GmbH, Otto-Lilienthal-Weg 2, D 76 646 Bruchsal, Germany;
telephone: +49 7251 3020 140; fax: +49 7251 3020 149; Internet: http://
www.dg-flugzeugbau.de/index-e.html; e-mail<EMAIL_ADDRESS>You
may review copies of the referenced service information at the FAA,
Small Airplane Directorate, 901 Locust, Kansas City, Missouri 64106.
For information on the availability of this material at the FAA, call
(816) 329-4148.

Examining the AD Docket

    You may examine the AD docket on the Internet at http://
www.regulations.gov; or in person at the Docket Management Facility
between 9 a.m. and 5 p.m., Monday through Friday, except Federal
holidays. The AD docket contains this AD, the regulatory evaluation,
any comments received, and other information. The street address for
the Docket Office (telephone<PHONE_NUMBER>) is in the ADDRESSES
section. Comments will be available in the AD docket shortly after
receipt.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Jim Rutherford, Aerospace Engineer,
FAA, Small Airplane Directorate, 901 Locust, Room 301, Kansas City,
Missouri 64106; telephone:<PHONE_NUMBER>; fax:<PHONE_NUMBER>.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

Discussion

    The European Aviation Safety Agency (EASA), which is the Technical
Agent for the Member States of the European Community, has issued EASA
AD No.: 2011-0053-E, dated March 24, 2011 (referred to after this as
``the MCAI''), to correct an unsafe condition for the specified
products. The MCAI states:

    It has been reported by DG-808 C owners that the bolt at the
landing gear control bellcrank was found mounted in the wrong
direction. Further investigations have shown that in such situation,
the bolt could interfere and damage:

--The air brake control pushrod, and
--The wing flap control pushrod if the landing gear is operated with
negative flap settings.

    This condition, if not detected and corrected, may lead to
reduce the controllability of the powered sailplane.
    For the reasons described above, this AD requires to inspect the
landing gear control bellcrank bolt for proper installation and the
accomplishment of the associated corrective actions, as applicable.

EASA issued AD No.: 2011-0053-E based on their determination that this
was a production error and a quality control problem. You may obtain
further information by examining the MCAI in the AD docket.

Relevant Service Information

    DG Flugzeugbau GmbH has issued Technical note No. 800/40, dated
February 14, 2011; and Section A-A of Undercarriage control circuit
Diagram 15, dated November 2004, of DG Flugzeugbau GmbH Maintenance
Manual for the Motorglider DG-808C, dated June 2005. The actions
described in this service information are intended to correct the
unsafe condition identified in the MCAI.

FAA's Determination and Requirements of the AD

    This product has been approved by the aviation authority of another
country, and is approved for operation in the United States. Pursuant
to our bilateral agreement with this State of Design Authority, they
have notified us of the unsafe condition described in the MCAI and
service information referenced above. We are issuing this AD because we
evaluated all information provided by the State of Design Authority and
determined the unsafe condition exists and is likely to exist or
develop on other products of the same type design.

Differences Between This AD and the MCAI or Service Information

    We have reviewed the MCAI and related service information and, in
general, agree with their substance. But we might have found it
necessary to use different words from those in the MCAI to ensure the
AD is clear for U.S. operators and is enforceable. In making these
changes, we do not intend to differ substantively from the information
provided in the MCAI and related service information.
    We might have also required different actions in this AD from those
in the MCAI in order to follow FAA policies. Any such differences are
described in a separate paragraph of the AD. These requirements take
precedence over those copied from the MCAI.

FAA's Determination of the Effective Date

    An unsafe condition exists that requires the immediate adoption of
this AD. The FAA has found that the risk to the flying public justifies
waiving notice and comment prior to adoption of this rule because it
has been reported that bolts at the landing gear control bellcrank were
mounted in the wrong direction. The incorrectly mounted bolt could
interfere and damage the air brake control pushrod and the wing flap
control pushrod if the landing gear is operated with negative flap
settings. This condition, if not detected and corrected, may lead to
reducing the controllability of the powered sailplane. Therefore, we
determined that notice and opportunity for public comment before
issuing this AD are impracticable and that good cause exists for making
this amendment effective in fewer than 30 days.

Comments Invited

    This AD is a final rule that involves requirements affecting flight
safety, and we did not precede it by notice and opportunity for public
comment. We invite you to send any written relevant data, views, or
arguments about this AD. Send your comments to an address listed under
the ADDRESSES section. Include ``Docket No. FAA-2011-0409; Directorate
Identifier 2011-CE-011-AD'' at the beginning of your comments. We
specifically invite comments on the overall regulatory, economic,
environmental, and energy aspects of this AD. We will consider all
comments received by the closing date and may amend this AD because of
those comments.
    We will post all comments we receive, without change, to http://
www.regulations.gov, including any personal information you provide. We
will also post a report summarizing each substantive verbal contact we
receive about this AD.

Costs of Compliance

    We estimate that this AD will affect 5 products of U.S. registry.
We also estimate that it would take about 0.5 work-hour per product to
comply with the basic requirements of this AD. The average labor rate
is $85 per work-hour. Required parts would cost about $0 per product.
    Based on these figures, we estimate the cost of the AD on U.S.
operators to be $213, or $43 per product.
    In addition, we estimate that any necessary follow-on actions would
take about 0.5 work-hour and require parts costing $250, for a cost of
$293 per product. We have no way of determining the number of products
that may need these actions.

Authority for This Rulemaking

    Title 49 of the United States Code specifies the FAA's authority to
issue rules on aviation safety. Subtitle I, section 106, describes the
authority of the FAA Administrator. ``Subtitle VII: Aviation
Programs,'' describes in more detail the scope of the Agency's
authority.
    We are issuing this rulemaking under the authority described in
``Subtitle VII, Part A, Subpart III, Section 44701: General
requirements.'' Under that section, Congress charges the FAA with
promoting safe flight of civil aircraft in air commerce by prescribing
regulations for practices, methods, and procedures the Administrator
finds necessary for safety in air commerce. This regulation is within
the scope of that authority because it addresses an unsafe condition
that is likely to exist or develop on products identified in this
rulemaking action.

Regulatory Findings

    We determined that this AD will not have federalism implications
under Executive Order 13132. This AD will not have a substantial direct
effect on the States, on the relationship between the national
government and the States, or on the distribution of power and
responsibilities among the various levels of government.
    For the reasons discussed above, I certify that this AD:
    (1) Is not a ``significant regulatory action'' under Executive
Order 12866;
    (2) Is not a ``significant rule'' under DOT Regulatory Policies and
Procedures (44 FR 11034, February 26, 1979); and
    (3) Will not have a significant economic impact, positive or
negative, on a substantial number of small entities under the criteria
of the Regulatory Flexibility Act.
    We prepared a regulatory evaluation of the estimated costs to
comply with this AD and placed it in the AD docket.

List of Subjects in 14 CFR Part 39

    Air transportation, Aircraft, Aviation safety, Incorporation by
reference, Safety.

Adoption of the Amendment

    Accordingly, under the authority delegated to me by the
Administrator, the FAA amends 14 CFR part 39 as follows:

PART 39--AIRWORTHINESS DIRECTIVES

0
1. The authority citation for part 39 continues to read as follows:

    Authority: 49 U.S.C. 106(g), 40113, 44701.

Sec.  39.13  [Amended]

0
2. The FAA amends Sec.  39.13 by adding the following new AD:

2011-09-16 DG Flugzeugbau GmbH: Amendment 39-16678; Docket No. FAA-
2011-0409; Directorate Identifier 2011-CE-011-AD.

Effective Date

    (a) This airworthiness directive (AD) becomes effective May 2,
2011.

Affected ADs

    (b) None.

Applicability

    (c) This AD applies to DG Flugzeugbau GmbH Glaser-Dirks Models
DG-808C gliders, serial numbers 8-316 B 216 X 1 through 8-417 B 316
X 76, certificated in any category.

Subject

    (d) Air Transport Association of America (ATA) Code 27: Flight
Controls.

Reason

    (e) The mandatory continuing airworthiness information (MCAI)
states:

    It has been reported by DG-808 C owners that the bolt at the
landing gear control bellcrank was found mounted in the wrong
direction. Further investigations have shown that in such situation,
the bolt could interfere and damage:

--The air brake control pushrod, and
--The wing flap control pushrod if the landing gear is operated with
negative flap settings.

    This condition, if not detected and corrected, may lead to
reduce the controllability of the powered sailplane.
    For the reasons described above, this AD requires to inspect the
landing gear control bellcrank bolt for proper installation and the
accomplishment of the associated corrective actions, as applicable.

Actions and Compliance

    (f) Unless already done, do the following actions.
    (1) Before further flight after May 2, 2011 (the effective date
of this AD), inspect the landing gear control bellcrank bolt M6x26
LN9037 for proper installation following DG-Flugzeugbau GmbH
Technical note No. 800/40, dated February 14, 2011.
    (2) If, during the inspection required by paragraph (f)(1) of
this AD, the bolt is found mounted in the wrong direction, before
further flight, do the following actions:
    (i) Install the landing gear control bellcrank bolt M6x26 LN9037
and its washers and nut correctly following DG-Flugzeugbau GmbH
Technical note No. 800/40, dated February 14, 2011; and Section A-A
of Undercarriage control circuit Diagram 15, dated November 2004, of
DG Flugzeugbau GmbH Maintenance Manual for the Motorglider DG-808C,
dated June 2005.
    (ii) Inspect the air brake control pushrod (part number (P/N)
6St13) and the wing flap control pushrod (P/N 8St7) for damage. If
any pushrod is damaged, before further flight, replace it with a
serviceable part following DG-Flugzeugbau GmbH Technical note No.
800/40, dated February 14, 2011.

FAA AD Differences

    Note: This AD differs from the MCAI and/or service information
as follows: No differences.

Other FAA AD Provisions

    (g) The following provisions also apply to this AD:
    (1) Alternative Methods of Compliance (AMOCs): The Manager,
Standards Office, FAA, has the authority to approve AMOCs for this
AD, if requested using the procedures found in 14 CFR 39.19. Send
information to Attn: Jim Rutherford, Aerospace Engineer, FAA, Small
Airplane Directorate, 901 Locust, Room 301, Kansas City, Missouri
64106; telephone:<PHONE_NUMBER>; fax:<PHONE_NUMBER>. Before using
any approved AMOC on any airplane to which the AMOC applies, notify
your appropriate principal inspector (PI) in the FAA Flight
Standards District Office (FSDO), or lacking a PI, your local FSDO.
    (2) Airworthy Product: For any requirement in this AD to obtain
corrective actions from a manufacturer or other source, use these
actions if they are FAA-approved. Corrective actions are considered
FAA-approved if they are approved by the State of Design Authority
(or their delegated agent). You are required to assure the product
is airworthy before it is returned to service.
    (3) Reporting Requirements: For any reporting requirement in
this AD, a federal agency may not conduct or sponsor, and a person
is not required to respond to, nor shall a person be subject to a
penalty for failure to comply with a collection of information
subject to the requirements of the Paperwork Reduction Act unless
that collection of information displays a current valid OMB Control
Number. The OMB Control Number for this information collection is
2120-0056. Public reporting for this collection of information is
estimated to be approximately 5 minutes per response, including the
time for reviewing instructions, completing and reviewing the
collection of information. All responses to this collection of
information are mandatory. Comments concerning the accuracy of this
burden and suggestions for reducing the burden should be directed to
the FAA at: 800 Independence Ave., SW., Washington, DC 20591, Attn:
Information Collection Clearance Officer, AES-200.

Related Information

    (h) Refer to MCAI European Aviation Safety Agency (EASA) AD No.:
2011-0053-E, dated March 24, 2011, DG-Flugzeugbau GmbH Technical
note No. 800/40, dated February 14, 2011; and Section A-A of
Undercarriage control circuit Diagram 15, dated November 2004, of DG
Flugzeugbau GmbH Maintenance Manual for the Motorglider DG-808C,
dated June 2005, for related information.

Material Incorporated by Reference

    (i) You must use DG-Flugzeugbau GmbH Technical note No. 800/40,
dated February 14, 2011; and Section A-A of Undercarriage control
circuit Diagram 15, dated November 2004, of DG Flugzeugbau GmbH
Maintenance Manual for the Motorglider DG-808C, dated June 2005, to
do the actions required by this AD, unless the AD specifies
otherwise.
    (1) The Director of the Federal Register approved the
incorporation by reference of this service information under 5
U.S.C. 552(a) and 1 CFR part 51.
    (2) For service information identified in this AD, contact DG-
Flugzeugbau GmbH, Otto-Lilienthal-Weg 2, D 76 646 Bruchsal, Germany;
telephone: +49 7251 3020 140; fax: +49 7251 3020 149; Internet:
http://www.dg-flugzeugbau.de/index-e.html; e-mail: dg@dg-
flugzeugbau.de.
    (3) You may review copies of the referenced service information
at the FAA, Small Airplane Directorate, 901 Locust, Kansas City,
Missouri 64106. For information on the availability of this material
at the FAA, call<PHONE_NUMBER>.
    (4) You may also review copies of the service information
incorporated by reference for this AD at the National Archives and
Records Administration (NARA). For information on the availability
of this material at NARA, call<PHONE_NUMBER>, or go to: http://
www.archives.gov/federal_register/code_of_federal_regulations/
ibr_locations.html.

    Issued in Kansas City, Missouri, on April 19, 2011.
Earl Lawrence,
Manager, Small Airplane Directorate, Aircraft Certification Service.
[FR Doc. 2011-10006 Filed 4-25-11; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910-13-P


[Federal Register: July 11, 2007 (Volume 72, Number 132)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Page 37632-37633]
[DOCID:fr11jy07-4]

=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY

40 CFR Part 62

[EPA-R03-OAR-2007-0354 ; FRL-8338-7 ]

Approval and Promulgation of State Air Quality Plans for
Designated Facilities and Pollutants; Delaware, and West Virginia;
Control of Emissions From Existing Other Solid Waste Incinerator Units

AGENCY: Environmental Protection Agency (EPA).

ACTION: Final rule; notice of administrative change.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: EPA is notifying the public that it has received negative
declarations for other solid waste incinerator (OSWI) units from the
States of Delaware, and West Virginia. These negative declarations
certify that OSWI units subject to the requirements of sections 111(d)
and 129 of the Clean Air Act (CAA) do not exist within the
jurisdictional boundaries of these air pollution control agencies.

DATES: The effective date is July 11, 2007.

ADDRESSES: Docket: All documents are located in the Regional Material
Edocket, identified by Docket ID Number EPA-RO3-OAR-2007-0354. The RME
index can be found at http://docket.epa.gov/rmepub/. Although listed in

the index, some information may not be publicly available, i.e.,
Confidential Business Information (CBI) or other information whose
disclosure is restricted by statute. Certain other material, such as
copyrighted material, is not placed on the Internet and will be
publicly available only in hard copy form. Publicly available docket
materials are available either electronically in RME or in hard copy at
the Air Protection Division, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency,
Region III, 1650 Arch Street, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania 19103. EPA
requests that if all possible, you contact the individual listed in the
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT section to schedule your inspection.
Copies of the State agency submittals are available at the Delaware
Department of Natural Resources & Environmental Control, 89 Kings
Highway, P.O. Box 1401, Dover, Delaware 19903; and the West Virginia
Department of Environmental Protection, Division of Air Quality, 601
57th Street SE., Charleston, WV 25304.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: James B. Topsale, P.E. at (215) 814-
2190, or by e-mail at<EMAIL_ADDRESS>
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

I. Background

    Sections 111(d) and 129 of the CAA require states to submit plans
to control certain pollutants (designated pollutants) at existing solid
waste combustor facilities (designated facilities) whenever standards
of performance have been established under section 111(b) for new
sources of the same type, and EPA has established emission guidelines
(EG) for such existing sources. A designated pollutant is any pollutant
for which no air quality criteria have been issued, and which is not
included on a list published under section 108(a) or section
112(b)(1)(A) of the CAA, but emissions of which are subject to a
standard of performance for new stationary sources. However, section
129 of the CAA, also requires EPA to promulgate EG for other solid
waste incineration (OSWI) units that emit a mixture of air pollutants.
These pollutants include organics (dioxins/furans), carbon monoxide,
metals (cadmium, lead, mercury), acid gases (hydrogen chloride, sulfur
dioxide, and nitrogen oxides) and particulate matter (including
opacity).
    On December 16, 2005 (70 FR 74870, and 74907), EPA promulgated OSWI
unit new source performance standards, 40 CFR part 60, subparts EEEE,
and emission guidelines (EG), subpart FFFF, respectively.
    The designated facilities to which the EG apply are existing very
small municipal solid waste combustion (MWC) units that have a design
combustion capacity of less than 35 tons per day and institutional
waste incineration units that commenced construction on or before
December 9, 2004.
    Subpart B of 40 CFR part 60 establishes procedures to be followed
and requirements to be met in the development and submission of state
plans for controlling designated pollutants. Also, 40 CFR parts 62
provides the procedural framework for the submission of these plans.
When designated facilities are located in a state, the state must then
develop and submit a plan for the control of the designated pollutant.
However, 40 CFR 60.23(b) and 62.06 provide that if there are no
existing sources of the designated pollutant in the state, the state
may submit a letter of certification to that effect (i.e., negative
declaration) in lieu of a plan. The negative declaration exempts the
state from the requirements of subpart B that require the submittal of
a 111(d)/129 plan. Under subpart FFFF, State are required to submit by
December 18, 2006 a negative declaration or approvable section 111(d)/
129 plan.

II. Final EPA Action

    The States of Delaware and West Virginia have determined that there
are no designated facilities, subject to subpart FFFF requirements, in
their respective air pollution control jurisdiction. Accordingly, each
air pollution control agency has submitted to EPA a negative
declaration letter certifying that fact. The submittal dates of these
letters are June 26, and June 2, 2006, respectively.
    Accordingly, EPA is amending part 62 to reflect the receipt of
these negative declaration letters from the noted air pollution control
agencies. Amendments are being made to the following 40 CFR part 62
subparts: I--Delaware, and XX--West Virginia.

III. Statutory and Executive Order Reviews

A. General Requirements

    Under Executive Order 12866 (58 FR 51735, October 4, 1993), this
action is not a ``significant regulatory action'' and therefore is not
subject to review by the Office of Management and Budget. For this
reason, this action is also not subject to Executive Order 13211,
``Actions Concerning Regulations That Significantly Affect Energy
Supply, Distribution, or Use'' (66 FR 28355, May 22, 2001). This action
merely notifies the public of EPA receipt of negative declarations from
state air pollution control agencies without any existing OSWI units in
their jurisdiction. This action imposes no requirements. Accordingly,
the Administrator certifies

that this rule will not have a significant economic impact on a
substantial number of small entities under the Regulatory Flexibility
Act (5 U.S.C. 601 et seq.). Because this action is only a notice and
does not impose any additional enforceable duty beyond that required by
state law, it does not contain any unfunded mandate or significantly or
uniquely affect small governments, as described in the Unfunded
Mandates Reform Act of 1995 (Pub. L. 104-4). This action also does not
have tribal implications because it will not have a substantial direct
effect on one or more Indian tribes, on the relationship between the
Federal Government and Indian tribes, or on the distribution of power
and responsibilities between the Federal Government and Indian tribes,
as specified by Executive Order 13175 (65 FR 67249, November 9, 2000).
This action also does not have Federalism implications because it does
not have substantial direct effects on the States, on the relationship
between the national government and the States, or on the distribution
of power and responsibilities among the various levels of government,
as specified in Executive Order 13132 (64 FR 43255, August 10, 1999).
This action merely notifies the public of EPA's receipt of negative
declarations for existing OSWI units from state agencies and does not
alter the relationship or the distribution of power and
responsibilities established in the Clean Air Act. This action also is
not subject to Executive Order 13045 ``Protection of Children from
Environmental Health Risks and Safety Risks'' (62 FR 19885, April 23,
1997), because it approves a state rule implementing a Federal
Standard.
    With regard to negative declarations for OSWI units received by EPA
for states, EPA's role is only to notify the public of the receipt of
such negative declarations. In this context, in the absence of a prior
existing requirement for the State to use voluntary consensus standards
(VCS), EPA has no authority to approve or disapprove a CAA section
111(d)/129 plan negative declaration submission for failure to use VCS.
It would thus be inconsistent with applicable law for EPA, when it
reviews a CAA section 111(d)/129 negative declaration, to use VCS in
place of a section 111(d)/129 negative declaration that otherwise
satisfies the provisions of the Clean Air Act. Thus, the requirements
of section 12(d) of the National Technology Transfer and Advancement
Act of 1995 (15 U.S.C. 272 note) do not apply. This action does not
impose an information collection burden under the provisions of the
Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 (44 U.S.C. 3501 et seq.).

B. Submission to Congress and the Comptroller General

    The Congressional Review Act, 5 U.S.C. 801 et seq., as added by the
Small Business Regulatory Enforcement Fairness Act of 1996, generally
provides that before a rule may take effect, the agency promulgating
the rule must submit a rule report, which includes a copy of the rule,
to each House of the Congress and to the Comptroller General of the
United States. This action is not a rulemaking, however, EPA will
submit a report containing this action and other required information
to the U.S. Senate, the U.S. House of Representatives, and the
Comptroller General of the United States prior to publication of the
rule in the Federal Register. This rule is not a ``major rule'' as
defined by 5 U.S.C. 804(2).

C. Petitions for Judicial Review

    Under section 307(b)(1) of the Clean Air Act, petitions for
judicial review of this action must be filed in the United States Court
of Appeals for the appropriate circuit by September 10, 2007. Filing a
petition for reconsideration by the Administrator of this action does
not affect the finality of this action for the purposes of judicial
review nor does it extend the time within which a petition for judicial
review may be filed, and shall not postpone the effectiveness of such
action.
    This action approving the section 111(d)/129 negative declarations
submitted by the States of Delaware, and West Virginia may not be
challenged later in proceedings to enforce its requirements. (See
section 307(b)(2).)

List of Subjects in 40 CFR Part 62

    Environmental protection, Administrative practice and procedure,
Air pollution control, Aluminum, Fertilizers, Fluoride,
Intergovernmental relations, Paper and paper products industry,
Phosphate, Reporting and recordkeeping requirements, Sulfur oxides,
Sulfur acid plants, Waste treatment and disposal.

    Dated: June 28, 2007.
William C. Early,
Acting Regional Administrator, Region III.

0
40 CFR part 62 is amended as follows:

PART 62--[AMENDED]

0
1. The authority citation for part 62 continues to read as follows:

    Authority: 42 U.S.C. 7401 et seq.

Subpart I--Delaware

0
2. Subpart I is amended by adding an undesignated center heading and
Sec.  62.1990 to read as follows:

Emissions From Existing Other Solid Waste Combustion Units

Sec.  62.1990  Identification of plan--negative declaration.

    Letter from the Delaware Department of Natural Resources and
Environmental Control submitted June 26, 2006, certifying that there
are no existing other solid waste incinerator units within the State of
Delaware that are subject to 40 CFR part 60, subpart FFFF.

Subpart XX--West Virginia

0
3. Subpart XX is amended by adding an undesignated center heading and
Sec.  62.12165 to read as follows:

Emissions From Other Solid Waste Incinerator Units

Sec.  62.12165  Identification of plan--negative declaration.

    Letter from the West Virginia Department of Environmental
Protection submitted June 2, 2006, certifying that there are no
existing other solid waste incinerator units within the State of West
Virginia that are subject to 40 CFR part 60, subpart FFFF.

[FR Doc. E7-13426 Filed 7-10-07; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 6560-50-P


[Federal Register Volume 83, Number 58 (Monday, March 26, 2018)]
[Notices]
[Pages 12999-13001]
[FR Doc No: 2018-06018]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

[Release No. 34-82912; File No. SR-DTC-2017-021]

Self-Regulatory Organizations; The Depository Trust Company;
Order Instituting Proceedings To Determine Whether To Approve or
Disapprove a Proposed Rule Change To Adopt a Recovery & Wind-Down Plan
and Related Rules

March 20, 2018.

I. Introduction

    On December 18, 2017, The Depository Trust Company (``DTC'') filed
with the Securities and Exchange Commission (``Commission''), pursuant
to Section 19(b)(1) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (``Act'')
\1\ and Rule 19b-4 thereunder,\2\ proposed rule change SR-DTC-2017-021
to adopt a recovery and wind-down plan and related rules (``Proposed
Rule Change'').\3\ The Proposed Rule Change was published for comment
in the Federal Register on January 8, 2018.\4\ The Commission did not
receive any comments on the Proposed Rule Change. On February 8, 2018,
pursuant to Section 19(b)(2)(A)(ii)(I) of the Act,\5\ the Commission
designated a longer period within which to approve, disapprove, or
institute proceedings to determine whether to approve or disapprove the
Proposed Rule Change.\6\ This order institutes proceedings, pursuant to
Section 19(b)(2)(B) of the Act,\7\ to determine whether to approve or
disapprove the Proposed Rule Change.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \1\ 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(1).
    \2\ 17 CFR 240.19b-4.
    \3\ On December 18, 2017, DTC filed this proposal as an advance
notice (SR-DTC-2017-803) with the Commission pursuant to Section
806(e)(1) of the Payment, Clearing, and Settlement Supervision Act
of 2010 (``Clearing Supervision Act'') and Rule 19b-4(n)(1)(i) of
the Act (``Advance Notice''). On January 24, 2018, the Commission
extended the review period of the Advance Notice for an additional
60 days pursuant to Section 806(e)(1)(H) of the Clearing Supervision
Act. See 12 U.S.C. 5465(e)(1); 17 CFR 240.19b-4(n)(1)(i); 12 U.S.C.
5465(e)(1)(H); and Securities Exchange Act Release No. 82579
(January 24, 2018), 83 FR 4310 (January 30, 2018) (SR-DTC-2017-803).
    \4\ Securities Exchange Act Release No. 82432 (January 2, 2018),
83 FR 884 (January 8, 2018) (SR-DTC-2017-021) (``Notice'').
    \5\ 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(2)(A)(ii)(I).
    \6\ Securities Exchange Act Release No. 82669 (February 8,
2018), 83 FR 6653 (February 14, 2018) (SR-DTC-2017-021; SR-FICC-
2017-021; SR-NSCC-2017-017).
    \7\ 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(2)(B).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

II. Summary of the Proposed Rule Change

    As described in the Notice,\8\ DTC proposes to adopt a Recovery &
Wind-down Plan (``R&W Plan'') and two proposed rules that would
facilitate the implementation of the R&W Plan: (i) Proposed Rule 32(A)
(Wind-down of the Corporation) (``Wind-down Rule''), and (ii) proposed
Rule 38 (Market Disruption and Force Majeure) (``Force Majeure Rule'').
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \8\ The description of the Proposed Rule Change is based on the
statements prepared by DTC in the Notice. See Notice, supra note 4.
Capitalized terms used herein and not otherwise defined herein are
defined in the Rules, By-Laws and Organization Certificate of DTC,
available at http://www.dtcc.com/legal/rules-and-procedures.aspx.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    DTC states that the R&W Plan is intended to be used by DTC's Board
of Directors and management in the event that DTC encounters scenarios
that could potentially prevent it from being able to provide its
critical services as a going concern.\9\ The R&W Plan would be
structured to provide a roadmap, define the strategy, and identify the
tools available to DTC to either (i) recover, in the event it
experiences losses that exceed its resources or (ii) wind-down its
business in a manner designed to permit its critical services to
continue in the event that such recovery efforts are not
successful.\10\ The R&W Plan would include tools that are provided for
in DTC's existing rules, policies, procedures, and contractual
arrangements,\11\ as well as the proposed Wind-down Rule and the
proposed Force Majeure Rule.\12\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \9\ See Notice, supra note 4, at 885.
    \10\ Id. at 886.
    \11\ Contractual arrangements include, for example, DTC's
existing committed or pre-arranged liquidity arrangements.
    \12\ See Notice, supra note 4, at 885.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    DTC states that the proposed Wind-down Rule and the proposed Force
Majeure Rule are designed to (i) facilitate the implementation of the
R&W Plan when necessary; (ii) provide Participants with transparency
around critical provisions of the R&W Plan that relate to their rights,
responsibilities, and obligations; and (iii) provide DTC

with the legal basis to implement the provisions of the R&W Plan that
concern the proposed Wind-down Rule and the proposed Force Majeure
Rule, when necessary.\13\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \13\ Id.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    As an overview, the R&W Plan would provide, among other matters,
(i) an overview of the business of DTC and its parent, The Depository
Trust & Clearing Corporation (``DTCC''); (ii) an analysis of DTC's
intercompany arrangements and critical links to other financial market
infrastructures; (iii) a description of DTC's services, and the
criteria used to determine which services are considered critical; (iv)
a description of the DTC and DTCC governance structure; (v) a
description of the governance around the overall recovery and wind-down
program; (vi) a discussion of tools available to DTC to mitigate
credit/market \14\ and liquidity risks, including recovery indicators
and triggers, and the governance around management of a stress event
along a ``Crisis Continuum'' timeline; (vii) a discussion of potential
non-default losses and the resources available to DTC to address such
losses, including recovery triggers and tools to mitigate such losses;
\15\ (viii) an analysis of the recovery tools' characteristics,
including how they are comprehensive, effective, and transparent, how
the tools provide appropriate incentives to Participants to, among
other things, control and monitor the risks they may present to DTC,
and how DTC seeks to minimize the negative consequences of executing
its recovery tools; and (ix) the framework and approach for the orderly
wind-down and transfer of DTC's business,\16\ including an estimate of
the time and costs to effect a recovery or orderly wind-down of
DTC.\17\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \14\ DTC states that for DTC, credit risk and market risk are
closely related because DTC monitors credit exposures from
Participants through risk management controls that are part of its
market risk management strategy. Id. at 888 n.22.
    \15\ As described in more detail in the Notice, this section of
the R&W Plan would describe the proposed Force Majeure Rule, which
would govern how DTC would address extraordinary events that may
occur outside its control. See Notice, supra note 4, at 894. The
proposed Force Majeure Rule would identify the events or
circumstances that would be considered a ``Market Disruption
Event,'' including, for example, events that lead to the suspension
or limitation of trading or banking in the markets in which DTC
operates, or the unavailability or failure of any material payment,
bank transfer, wire or securities settlement systems. Id. Under the
proposed Force Majeure Rule, during the pendency of a Market
Disruption Event, DTC would be entitled to (i) suspend the provision
of any or all services, and (ii) take, or refrain from taking, or
require its Participants and Pledgees to take, or refrain from
taking, any actions it considers appropriate to address, alleviate,
or mitigate the event and facilitate the continuation of DTC's
services as may be practicable. Id.
    \16\ This section of the R&W Plan would refer to the proposed
Wind-down Rule.
    \17\ See Notice, supra note 4, at 885.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    The framework and approach for orderly wind-down would provide (i)
for the transfer of DTC's business, assets, securities inventory, and
membership to another legal entity; (ii) that DTC would effectuate the
transfer in connection with proceedings under Chapter 11 of the U.S.
Bankruptcy Code; \18\ and (iii) that after effectuating this transfer,
DTC would liquidate any remaining assets in an orderly manner in
bankruptcy proceedings.\19\ DTC states that it believes that the
proposed transfer approach to a wind-down would meet its objectives of
(i) assuring that DTC's critical services will be available to the
market as long as there are Participants in good standing, and (ii)
minimizing disruption to the operations of Participants and financial
markets generally that might be caused by DTC's failure.\20\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \18\ 11 U.S.C. 101 et seq.
    \19\ See Notice, supra note 4, at 890.
    \20\ Id. at 890-91.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

III. Proceedings To Determine Whether To Approve or Disapprove the
Proposed Rule Change and Grounds for Disapproval Under Consideration

    The Commission is instituting proceedings pursuant to Section
19(b)(2)(B) of the Act \21\ to determine whether the Proposed Rule
Change should be approved or disapproved. Institution of proceedings is
appropriate at this time in view of the legal and policy issues raised
by the Proposed Rule Change. Institution of proceedings does not
indicate that the Commission has reached any conclusions with respect
to any of the issues involved. Rather, the Commission seeks and
encourages interested persons to comment on the Proposed Rule Change,
and provide the Commission with arguments to support the Commission's
analysis as to whether to approve or disapprove the Proposed Rule
Change.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \21\ 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(2)(B).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    Pursuant to Section 19(b)(2)(B) of the Act,\22\ the Commission is
providing notice of the grounds for disapproval under consideration.
The Commission is instituting proceedings to allow for additional
analysis of, and input from commenters with respect to, the Proposed
Rule Change's consistency with Section 17A of the Act,\23\ and the
rules thereunder, including the following provisions:
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \22\ Id.
    \23\ 15 U.S.C. 78q-1.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

     Section 17A(b)(3)(F) of the Act,\24\ which requires, among
other things, that the rules of a clearing agency, such as DTC, must be
designed to assure the safeguarding of securities and funds which are
in the custody or control of the clearing agency or for which it is
responsible and to protect investors and the public interest; and
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \24\ 15 U.S.C. 78q-1(b)(3)(F).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

     Rule 17Ad-22(e)(3)(ii) under the Act,\25\ which requires a
covered clearing agency,\26\ such as DTC, to, among other things,
establish, implement, maintain and enforce written policies and
procedures reasonably designed to, as applicable, maintain a sound risk
management framework for comprehensively managing legal, credit,
liquidity, operational, general business, investment, custody, and
other risks that arise in or are borne by DTC, which includes plans for
the recovery and orderly wind-down of DTC necessitated by credit
losses, liquidity shortfalls, losses from general business risk, or any
other losses.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \25\ 17 CFR 240.17Ad-22(e)(3)(ii).
    \26\ See 17 CFR 240.17Ad-22(a)(5) for the definition of a
covered clearing agency.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

IV. Procedure: Request for Written Comments

    The Commission requests that interested persons provide written
submissions of their views, data, and arguments with respect to the
issues identified above, as well as any other concerns they may have
with the Proposed Rule Change. In particular, the Commission invites
the written views of interested persons concerning whether the Proposed
Rule Change is consistent with Section 17A(b)(3)(F) of the Act,\27\
Rule 17Ad-22(e)(3)(ii) under the Act,\28\ or any other provision of the
Act, or the rules and regulations thereunder. Although there do not
appear to be any issues relevant to approval or disapproval that would
be facilitated by an oral presentation of views, data, and arguments,
the Commission will consider, pursuant to Rule 19b-4(g) under the
Act,\29\ any request for an opportunity to make an oral
presentation.\30\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \27\ 15 U.S.C. 78q-1(b)(3)(F).
    \28\ 17 CFR 240.17Ad-22(e)(3)(ii).
    \29\ 17 CFR 240.19b-4(g).
    \30\ Section 19(b)(2) of the Act grants to the Commission
flexibility to determine what type of proceeding--either oral or
notice and opportunity for written comments--is appropriate for
consideration of a particular proposal by a self-regulatory
organization. See Securities Act Amendments of 1975, Senate Comm. on
Banking, Housing & Urban Affairs, S. Rep. No. 75, 94th Cong., 1st
Sess. 30 (1975).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    Interested persons are invited to submit written data, views, and
arguments regarding whether the Proposed Rule Change should be approved
or disapproved by April 16,

2018. Any person who wishes to file a rebuttal to any other person's
submission must file that rebuttal by April 30, 2018.
    The Commission asks that commenters address the sufficiency of
DTC's statements in support of the Proposed Rule Change, which are set
forth in the Notice,\31\ in addition to any other comments they may
wish to submit about the Proposed Rule Change.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \31\ See Notice, supra note 4.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    Comments may be submitted by any of the following methods:

Electronic Comments

     Use the Commission's internet comment form (http://www.sec.gov/rules/sro.shtml); or
     Send an email to [email protected]. Please include
File Number SR-DTC-2017-021 on the subject line.

Paper Comments

     Send paper comments in triplicate to Secretary, Securities
and Exchange Commission, 100 F Street NE, Washington, DC 20549-1090.

All submissions should refer to File Number SR-DTC-2017-021. This file
number should be included on the subject line if email is used. To help
the Commission process and review your comments more efficiently,
please use only one method. The Commission will post all comments on
the Commission's internet website (http://www.sec.gov/rules/sro.shtml).
Copies of the submission, all subsequent amendments, all written
statements with respect to the Proposed Rule Change that are filed with
the Commission, and all written communications relating to the Proposed
Rule Change between the Commission and any person, other than those
that may be withheld from the public in accordance with the provisions
of 5 U.S.C. 552, will be available for website viewing and printing in
the Commission's Public Reference Room, 100 F Street NE, Washington, DC
20549 on official business days between the hours of 10:00 a.m. and
3:00 p.m. Copies of the filing also will be available for inspection
and copying at the principal office of DTC and on DTCC's website
(http://dtcc.com/legal/sec-rule-filings.aspx). All comments received
will be posted without change. Persons submitting comments are
cautioned that we do not redact or edit personal identifying
information from comment submissions. You should submit only
information that you wish to make available publicly. All submissions
should refer to File Number SR-DTC-2017-021 and should be submitted on
or before April 16, 2018. Rebuttal comments should be submitted by
April 30, 2018.

    For the Commission, by the Division of Trading and Markets,
pursuant to delegated authority.\32\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \32\ 17 CFR 200.30-3(a)(57).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

Eduardo A. Aleman,
Assistant Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2018-06018 Filed 3-23-18; 8:45 am]
 BILLING CODE 8011-01-P


[Federal Register Volume 82, Number 246 (Tuesday, December 26, 2017)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Pages 60869-60870]
[FR Doc No: 2017-27718]

=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY

Coast Guard

33 CFR Part 117

[Docket No. USCG-2017-0967]

Drawbridge Operation Regulation; Atlantic Intracoastal Waterway,
Alligator River, Columbia, NC

AGENCY: Coast Guard, DHS.

ACTION: Notice of deviation from drawbridge regulation; modification.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Coast Guard has modified a temporary deviation from the
operating schedule that governs the US 64/Alligator River Bridge which
carries US 64 over the Atlantic Intracoastal Waterway (AICW), Alligator
River, mile 84.2, near Columbia, NC. The deviation is necessary to
facilitate bridge maintenance. This deviation allows the bridge to
remain in the closed-to-navigation position.

DATES: This deviation is effective without actual notice from December
26, 2017 through 6 p.m. on March 29, 2018. For the purposes of
enforcement, actual notice will be used from 7 a.m. on November 6,
2017, until December 26, 2017.

ADDRESSES: The docket for this deviation, USCG-2017-0967, is available
at http://www.regulations.gov. Type the docket number in the ``SEARCH''
box and click ``SEARCH''. Click on Open Docket Folder on the line
associated with this deviation.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: If you have questions on this
temporary deviation, call or email Mr. Michael Thorogood, Bridge
Administration Branch Fifth District, Coast Guard, telephone 757-398-
6557, email [email protected].

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: On November 1, 2017, the Coast Guard
published a temporary deviation entitled ``Drawbridge Operation
Regulation; Atlantic Intracoastal Waterway, Alligator River, Columbia,
NC'' in the Federal Register (82 FR 50577). That document resulted from
North Carolina Department of Transportation's request for a temporary
deviation, occurring from 7 a.m. on November 6, 2017, through 7 p.m. on
November 17, 2017, from normal operation of the drawbridge to
facilitate bridge maintenance. Subsequent to the approval of that
request, North Carolina Department of Transportation requested a
modification, extending the temporary deviation from 7:01 p.m. on
November 17, 2017, through 6 p.m. on March 29, 2018, to allow more time
to perform and complete additional bridge maintenance discovered during
the previous temporary deviation. Therefore, through this document, the
Coast Guard modifies the dates of the previously approved temporary
deviation to allow the US 64/Alligator River Bridge that carries US 64
over the AICW, Alligator River, mile 84.2, at near Columbia, NC, to
remain in the closed-to-navigation position from 7 a.m. to 7 p.m., on
Wednesday, December 27, 2017, through Saturday, December 30, 2017;
Monday, January 1, 2018, through Saturday, January 5, 2018; and Monday,
January 8, 2018, through Tuesday, January 9, 2018. During these closure
periods the bridge will open on signal, if at least 2 hours notice is
given. The bridge will also remain in the closed-to-navigation position
24 hours a day, 7 days a week, from 6 a.m. on Wednesday, January 10,
2018, through 6 p.m. on Wednesday, January 17, 2018; and from 6 a.m. on
Wednesday, March 14, 2018, through 6 p.m. on Wednesday, March 21, 2018.
Alternative work dates for these closure periods will be from noon on
Thursday, January 18, 2018, through 6 p.m. on Wednesday, January 24,
2018; and from noon on Thursday, March 22, 2018, through 6 p.m. on
Thursday, March 29, 2018. If the alternative work dates from noon on
Thursday, January 18, 2018, through 6 p.m. on Wednesday, January 24,
2018 are used, the bridge will also remain in the closed-to-navigation
position from 7 a.m. to 6 p.m., Monday through Saturday, from January
22, 2018, through March 14, 2018; except for scheduled daily openings
at noon, if at least 2 hours notice is given. If the alternative work
dates from noon on Thursday, January 18, 2018, through 6 p.m. on
Wednesday, January 24, 2018 are not used, the bridge will also remain
in the closed-to-navigation position from 7 a.m. to 6 p.m., Monday
through Saturday, from January 17, 2018, through March 14, 2018; except
for scheduled daily openings at noon, if at least 2 hours notice is
given. The Coast Guard will inform the users of the waterway through
our Broadcast Notices to Mariners, if the alternative work dates

will be used. The bridge has a vertical clearance of 14 feet above mean
high water in the closed position and unlimited feet above mean high
water in the open position. The bridge will open on signal at all other
times. The current operating schedule is set out in 33 CFR 117.5.
    The AICW, Alligator River is used by a variety of vessels
including, small commercial vessels, tug and barge traffic, and
recreational vessels. The Coast Guard has carefully coordinated the
restrictions with waterway users in publishing this temporary
deviation.
    Vessels able to pass through the bridge in the closed-to-navigation
position may do so at any time. During the closure periods, the bridge
will not be able to open for emergencies and the Croatan Sound to the
Pamlico Sound can be used as an alternative route for vessels unable to
pass through the bridge in the closed position. During the closure
periods with scheduled openings at noon, the bridge will be able to
open up for emergencies, if at least one hour notice is given. The
Coast Guard will also inform the users of the waterway through our
Local Notice and Broadcast Notices to Mariners of the change in
operating schedule for the bridge so vessel operators can arrange their
transits to minimize any impact caused by the temporary deviation.
    In accordance with 33 CFR 117.35(e), the drawbridge must return to
its regular operating schedule immediately at the end of the effective
period of this temporary deviation. This deviation from the operating
regulations is authorized under 33 CFR 117.35.

    Dated: December 18, 2017.
Hal R. Pitts,
Bridge Program Manager, Fifth Coast Guard District.
[FR Doc. 2017-27718 Filed 12-22-17; 8:45 am]
 BILLING CODE 9110-04-P


[Federal Register Volume 85, Number 197 (Friday, October 9, 2020)]
[Proposed Rules]
[Pages 64089-64090]
[FR Doc No: 2020-19560]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY

40 CFR Part 52

[EPA-HQ-OAR-2019-0611; FRL-10013-86-OAR]
RIN 2060-AU54

Implementation of the Revoked 1997 8-Hour Ozone National Ambient
Air Quality Standards; Updates for Areas that Attained by the
Attainment Date

AGENCY: Environmental Protection Agency (EPA).

ACTION: Proposed rule.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) is proposing updates
to the Code of Federal Regulations (CFR) to codify its findings that
nine areas in four states attained the revoked 1997 8-hour ozone
National Ambient Air Quality Standards (herein referred to as the 1997
ozone NAAQS) by the applicable attainment dates. The parallel direct
final rule is published in the ``Rules and Regulations'' section of
this issue of the Federal Register because the Agency views this as a
noncontroversial action. If no significant adverse comments are
received on the direct final rule, then no further action will be taken
on this proposal and the direct final rule will become effective as
provided in that action.

DATES: Comments. Comments must be received on or before November 9,
2020. If the EPA receives significant comment on the proposed rule, the
EPA will respond in writing to comments and include the written
responses in any subsequent final rule based on the proposed rule.
Public Hearing: If anyone contacts us requesting to speak at a public
hearing by October 14, 2020, we will hold a public hearing. Additional
information about the hearing, if requested, will be published in a
subsequent Federal Register document and posted at https://www.epa.gov/stationary-engines/newsource-performance-standardsstationary-compression-ignitioninternal-0. See SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION for
information on requesting and registering for a public hearing.

ADDRESSES: Comments: Submit your comments, identified by Docket ID No.
EPA-HQ-OAR-2019-0611, at http://www.regulations.gov. Follow the online
instructions for submitting comments. Once submitted, comments cannot
be edited or removed from Regulations.gov. The EPA may publish any
comment received to its public docket. Do not submit electronically any
information you consider to be Confidential Business Information (CBI)
or other information whose disclosure is restricted by statute.
Multimedia submissions (audio, video, etc.) must be accompanied by a
written comment. The written comment is considered the official comment
and should include discussion of all points you wish to make. The EPA
will generally not consider comments or comment contents located
outside of the primary submission (i.e., on the Web, Cloud or other
file sharing system). For additional submission methods, the full EPA
public comment policy, information about CBI or multimedia submissions,
and general guidance on making effective comments, please visit http://www2.epa.gov/dockets/comments.html. Out of an abundance of caution for
members of the public and our staff, the EPA Docket Center and Reading
Room are closed to the public, with limited exceptions, to reduce the
risk of transmitting COVID-19. Our Docket Center staff will continue to
provide remote customer service via email, phone, and webform. We
encourage the public to submit comments via https://www.regulations.gov/ or email, as there may be a delay in processing
mail and faxes. Hand deliveries and couriers may be received by
scheduled appointment only. For further information on EPA Docket
Center services and the current status, please visit us online at
https://www.epa.gov/dockets.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Ms. Virginia Raps, Air Quality Policy
Division, Office of Air Quality Planning and Standards, U.S.
Environmental Protection Agency, Mail Code: C539-01, Research Triangle
Park, NC 27711; telephone number<PHONE_NUMBER>; email address:
<EMAIL_ADDRESS>

    To request a public hearing, contact Ms. Pam Long, U.S. EPA, Office
of Air Quality Planning and Standards, Air Quality Policy Division
(C504-01), Research Triangle Park, NC 27711; telephone number (919)
541-0641; email address<EMAIL_ADDRESS>
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

I.

A. Does this action apply to me?

    Entities potentially affected directly by this proposed action
include the public seeking information on the air quality status of the
subject areas, and State air agencies for which areas are found to
attain by the attainment date.

B. What should I consider as I prepare my comments for the EPA?

    When submitting comments, remember to:
     Identify the rulemaking docket by docket number and other
identifying information (subject heading, Federal Register date, and
page number).
     Follow directions. The proposed rule may ask you to
respond to a specific question or organize comments by referencing a
Code of Federal Regulations (CFR) part or section number.
     Explain why you agree or disagree, suggest alternatives
and substitute language for your requested changes.
     Describe any assumptions and provide any technical
information and data that you used to support your comment.
     If you estimate potential costs or burdens, explain how
you arrived at your estimate in sufficient detail to allow for it to be
reproduced.
     Provide specific examples to illustrate your concerns
wherever possible and suggest alternatives.
     Explain your views as clearly as possible avoiding the use
of profanity or personal threats.
     Make sure to submit your comments by the comment period
deadline identified.

C. How can I find information about a possible hearing?

    To request a public hearing or information pertaining to a public
hearing regarding this document, contact Ms. Pam Long, OAQPS, U.S. EPA,
at<PHONE_NUMBER> or<EMAIL_ADDRESS>on or before October 14, 2020.
Additional information about the hearing, if one is requested, will be
published in a subsequent Federal Register document.

II. Direct Final Rule

    Updates to 40 CFR part 52 are proposed by this notice exactly as
given in the direct final rule, which is published in the Rules and
Regulations section of this issue of the Federal Register. The EPA has
published the updates to part 52 as a direct final action because the
EPA views the updates as noncontroversial and anticipates no
significant adverse comments. The EPA has explained its reasons for
these updates in the direct final rule. If no significant adverse
comments are received, no further action will be taken on this
proposal, and the direct final rule will become effective as provided
in that action.
    If the EPA receives relevant adverse comments on the direct final
rule, the EPA will publish a timely withdrawal of the direct final rule
in the Federal Register. If the direct final rule in the Rules and
Regulations section of this issue of the Federal Register is withdrawn,
all comments received on this proposal will be addressed in a
subsequent final rule. In such case, the EPA does not intend to
institute a second comment period on the subsequent final action. Any
parties interested in commenting should do so at this time. For details
of the rationale for the proposal and the regulatory revisions, see the
direct final rule published in the Rules and Regulations section of
this issue of the Federal Register.

III. Statutory and Executive Order Reviews

    For a complete discussion of the administrative requirements
applicable to this proposed action, see the direct final rule in the
Rules and Regulations section of this issue of the Federal Register.

List of Subjects In 40 CFR Part 52

    Environmental protection, Administrative practice and procedure,
Air pollution control, Designations and classifications, Incorporation
by reference, Intergovernmental relations, Nitrogen oxides, Ozone,
Reporting and recordkeeping requirements and Volatile organic
compounds.

Andrew Wheeler,
Administrator.
[FR Doc. 2020-19560 Filed 10-8-20; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6560-50-P


[Federal Register Volume 80, Number 44 (Friday, March 6, 2015)]
[Notices]
[Pages 12159-12160]
[FR Doc No: 2015-05245]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission

Combined Notice of Filings #1

    Take notice that the Commission received the following electric
corporate filings:

    Docket Numbers: EC15-78-000.
    Applicants: Louisville Gas & Electric Company, Kentucky Utilities
Company.
    Description: Application of Louisville Gas & Electric Company, et
al.
    Filed Date: 2/25/15.
    Accession Number: 20150225-5346.
    Comments Due: 5 p.m. ET 3/18/15.

    Docket Numbers: EC15-79-000.
    Applicants: Blackwell Solar, LLC, Lost Hills Solar, LLC.
    Description: Application of Blackwell Solar, LLC, et al. for
Authorization Under Section 203 of the Federal Power Act and Request
for Expedited Action, Confidential Treatment, and Waivers.
    Filed Date: 2/26/15.
    Accession Number: 20150226-5339.
    Comments Due: 5 p.m. ET 3/19/15.

    Docket Numbers: EC15-80-000.
    Applicants: DES Wholesale, LLC.
    Description: Application for Disposition of Facilities of DES
Wholesale, LLC.
    Filed Date: 2/26/15.
    Accession Number: 20150226-5349.
    Comments Due: 5 p.m. ET 3/19/15.

    Take notice that the Commission received the following exempt
wholesale generator filings:

    Docket Numbers: EG15-56-000.
    Applicants: Red Horse Wind 2, LLC.
    Description: Red Horse Wind 2, LLC Notice of Self-Certification of
Exempt Wholesale Generator Status.
    Filed Date: 2/27/15.
    Accession Number: 20150227-5368.
    Comments Due: 5 p.m. ET 3/20/15.

    Docket Numbers: EG15-57-000.
    Applicants: Balko Wind, LLC.
    Description: Balko Wind, LLC Notice of Self-Certification of Exempt
Wholesale Generator Status.
    Filed Date: 2/27/15.
    Accession Number: 20150227-5369.
    Comments Due: 5 p.m. ET 3/20/15.

    Take notice that the Commission received the following electric
rate filings:

    Docket Numbers: ER15-871-001.
    Applicants: Wheelabrator Westchester, L.P.

    Description: Compliance filing per 35: Compliance to 94 to be
effective 3/18/2015.
    Filed Date: 2/27/15.
    Accession Number: 20150227-5137.
    Comments Due: 5 p.m. ET 3/20/15.

    Docket Numbers: ER15-999-001.
    Applicants: Luke Paper Company.
    Description: Compliance filing per 35: Amendment to be effective 4/
7/2015.
    Filed Date: 2/27/15.
    Accession Number: 20150227-5227.
    Comments Due: 5 p.m. ET 3/20/15.

    Docket Numbers: ER15-1129-000.
    Applicants: PJM Interconnection, L.L.C.
    Description: Sec.  205(d) rate filing per 35.13(a)(2)(iii): Service
Agreement No. 3402; Queue No. Y2-105 to be effective 1/27/2015.
    Filed Date: 2/26/15.
    Accession Number: 20150226-5309.
    Comments Due: 5 p.m. ET 3/19/15.

    Docket Numbers: ER15-1130-000.
    Applicants: Midcontinent Independent System Operator, Ameren
Illinois Company.
    Description: Sec.  205(d) rate filing per 35.13(a)(2)(iii): 2015-
02-27_SA 2752 Ameren-Bishop Hill Interconnection FSA to be effective 1/
28/2015.
    Filed Date: 2/27/15.
    Accession Number: 20150227-5125.
    Comments Due: 5 p.m. ET 3/20/15.

    Docket Numbers: ER15-1131-000.
    Applicants: New England Power Pool Participants Committee.
    Description: Sec.  205(d) rate filing per 35.13(a)(2)(iii): March
2015 Membership Filing to be effective 3/1/2015.
    Filed Date: 2/27/15.
    Accession Number: 20150227-5337.
    Comments Due: 5 p.m. ET 3/20/15.

    Docket Numbers: ER15-1132-000.
    Applicants: Entergy Louisiana Power, LLC.
    Description: Baseline eTariff Filing per 35.1: ELP MBR Application
to be effective 12/31/9998.
    Filed Date: 2/27/15.
    Accession Number: 20150227-5340.
    Comments Due: 5 p.m. ET 3/20/15.

    Docket Numbers: ER15-1133-000.
    Applicants: Idaho Power Company.
    Description: Sec.  205(d) rate filing per 35.13(a)(2)(iii): PAC
Long-Term Firm BORA-LGBP Service Agreement to be effective 5/1/2015.
    Filed Date: 2/27/15.
    Accession Number: 20150227-5381.
    Comments Due: 5 p.m. ET 3/20/15.

    Docket Numbers: ER15-1134-000.
    Applicants: Midcontinent Independent System Operator, Inc.,
American Transmission Company LLC.
    Description: Sec.  205(d) rate filing per 35.13(a)(2)(iii): 2015-
02-27_SA 2754 ATC-ACEC Elective Facilities Construction Agreement to be
effective 4/29/2015.
    Filed Date: 2/27/15.
    Accession Number: 20150227-5387.
    Comments Due: 5 p.m. ET 3/20/15.

    Docket Numbers: ER15-1135-000.
    Applicants: PJM Interconnection, L.L.C.
    Description: Sec.  205(d) rate filing per 35.13(a)(2)(iii): Service
Agreement No. 4094; NQ128 (ISA) to be effective 1/30/2015.
    Filed Date: 2/27/15.
    Accession Number: 20150227-5396.
    Comments Due: 5 p.m. ET 3/20/15.

    Docket Numbers: ER15-1136-000.
    Applicants: Big Cajun I Peaking Power LLC.
    Description: Sec.  205(d) rate filing per 35.13(a)(2)(iii):
Proposed Rate Schedule FERC No. 2 to be effective 5/1/2015.
    Filed Date: 2/27/15.
    Accession Number: 20150227-5424.
    Comments Due: 5 p.m. ET 3/20/15.

    Docket Numbers: ER15-1137-000.
    Applicants: ISO New England Inc.
    Description: ISO New England Inc. 9th Forward Capacity Auction
Results.
    Filed Date: 2/27/15.
    Accession Number: 20150227-5434.
    Comments Due: 5 p.m. ET 4/13/15.

    Docket Numbers: ER15-1138-000.
    Applicants: PJM Interconnection, L.L.C.
    Description: Sec.  205(d) rate filing per 35.13(a)(2)(iii): Service
Agreement No. 4097; Queue AA1-019 (WMPA) to be effective 2/2/2015.
    Filed Date: 2/27/15.
    Accession Number: 20150227-5440.
    Comments Due: 5 p.m. ET 3/20/15.

    Docket Numbers: ER15-1139-000.
    Applicants: Southwest Power Pool, Inc.
    Description: Sec.  205(d) rate filing per 35.13(a)(2)(iii):
Attachment J Section III.D Revisions to be effective 5/1/2015.
    Filed Date: 2/27/15.
    Accession Number: 20150227-5457.
    Comments Due: 5 p.m. ET 3/20/15.

    Docket Numbers: ER15-1140-000.
    Applicants: Southwest Power Pool, Inc.
    Description: Sec.  205(d) rate filing per 35.13(a)(2)(iii): 2198R18
Kansas Power Pool NITSA NOA to be effective 2/1/2015.
    Filed Date: 2/27/15.
    Accession Number: 20150227-5463.
    Comments Due: 5 p.m. ET 3/20/15.

    The filings are accessible in the Commission's eLibrary system by
clicking on the links or querying the docket number.
    Any person desiring to intervene or protest in any of the above
proceedings must file in accordance with Rules 211 and 214 of the
Commission's Regulations (18 CFR 385.211 and 385.214) on or before 5:00
p.m. Eastern time on the specified comment date. Protests may be
considered, but intervention is necessary to become a party to the
proceeding.
    eFiling is encouraged. More detailed information relating to filing
requirements, interventions, protests, service, and qualifying
facilities filings can be found at: http://www.ferc.gov/docs-filing/efiling/filing-req.pdf. For other information, call<PHONE_NUMBER>
(toll free). For TTY, call<PHONE_NUMBER>.

    Dated: February 27, 2015.
Nathaniel J. Davis, Sr.,
Deputy Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2015-05245 Filed 3-5-15; 8:45 am]
 BILLING CODE 6717-01-P


MEMORANDUM

TO:	Mary Johnson, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, OAQPS/SPPD

FROM:	Eastern Research Group

DATE:	December 2012

SUBJECT:	Revision of Cost Impacts for Reconsideration of the NESHAP for Area Sources:  Industrial, Commercial, and Institutional Boilers

1.0	INTRODUCTION
      This memorandum describes corrections to cost impacts published in Estimated Impacts from the Proposed Amendments to the NESHAP for Area Sources: Industrial, Commercial, and Institutional Boilers  which provides details for  the estimated cost, emissions, and secondary impacts for the proposed amendments to the promulgated March, 2011 Area Source Industrial, Commercial, and Institutional Boiler NESHAP (76 FR 15554)[1].  The data presented in this memorandum represent the cost impacts from the March 2011 Final Rule to the December 2011 Proposed Reconsideration of the final rule (76 FR 80532) for the selected options 4E and 4N, and replace the data presented in Section 3.0 of the published Estimated Impacts from the Proposed Amendments to the NESHAP for Area Sources: Industrial, Commercial, and Institutional Boilers.  This memorandum also discusses why annualized costs for existing area sources increased from the March 2011 final rule.
      This memorandum is separated into the following sections:
      1.0	Introduction
      2.0	Discussion of Changes to Cost Impacts
      3.0	References
2.0	DISCUSSION OF CHANGES TO COST IMPACTS
      The November 2011 memorandum titled "Estimated Impacts from the Proposed Amendments to the NESHAP for Area Sources:  Industrial, Commercial, and Institutional Boilers" portrayed cost impacts for both existing and new area source boilers[1].  Table 1 ("Summary of Changes to Cost Impacts since Promulgated Rule") in this previous memorandum portrayed costs from regulatory option 3E for existing area sources and regulatory option 3N for new area sources.  Because the options selected in the final rule were regulatory options 4E and 4N, Table 1 is being updated to portray cost impacts calculated under regulatory options 4E and 4N for existing and new area source boilers, respectively.  A discussion of the various regulatory options is provided in the memorandum titled "Revised Methodology for Estimating Impacts from Industrial, Commercial, Institutional Boilers at Area Sources of Hazardous Air Pollutant Emissions" in the docket[2].  In option 3E, all existing large (greater than 10 million British thermal units per hour) coal-, biomass-, and liquid-fired boilers must meet mercury (Hg) and carbon monoxide (CO) limits based on MACT.  Similarly, in option 3N, new large biomass- and liquid-fired boilers, as well as new coal-fired boilers of any size, must meet Hg and CO limits based on MACT.  Options 4E and 4N are similar to options 3E and 3N, respectively, with the exception of existing and new biomass- and liquid-fired boilers being subject to a tune-up in lieu of Hg and CO limits.
      Table 1 contains the cost impacts for options 3E and 3N as presented in Table 1 of the memorandum "Estimated Impacts from the Proposed Amendments to the NESHAP for Area Sources:  Industrial, Commercial, and Institutional Boilers".  Table 2 contains the cost impacts for the chosen regulatory options 4E and 4N.

Table 1 - Summary of Changes to Cost Impacts since Promulgated Rule for Alternative Regulatory Options 3E and 3N
                                    Source
                       Total Capital Investment ($2008)
                       Total Annualized Costs ($2008)[A]

                               Promulgated Rule
                                Reconsideration
                               Promulgated Rule
                                Reconsideration
                         Existing Sources (option 3E)
                                 2,100,370,929
                                 2,100,370,929
                                  586,995,677
                                  598,829,342
                                  New Sources
                                  (option 3N)
                                  619,756,216
                                  508,933,671
                                  264,869,374
                                  234,624,437
A Annualized costs for existing sources include energy assessment costs.
Table 2  -  Summary of Changes to Cost Impacts since Promulgated Rule for Chosen Regulatory Options 4E and 4N
                                    Source
                       Total Capital Investment ($2008)
                       Total Annualized Costs ($2008)[A]

                               Promulgated Rule
                                Reconsideration
                               Promulgated Rule
                                Reconsideration
                               Existing Sources
                                  (option 4E)
                                 1,303,809,341
                                 1,303,809,341
                                  487,097,790
                                  499,569,047
                                  New Sources
                                  (option 4N)
                                  125,236,654
                                  76,398,844
                                  47,762,318
                                  27,559,196
[A] Annualized costs for existing sources include energy assessment costs.

2.1	Increased Annualized Costs for Existing Sources
      In the memorandum "Revised Methodology for Estimating Impacts from Industrial, Commercial, Institutional Boilers at Area Sources of Hazardous Air Pollutant Emissions", the annualized costs for fabric filters for existing large coal-fired area source boilers were incorrectly assigned a cost of $274,739 per boiler.  We have revised the annual cost estimate for these units to $422,359 per boiler.   The total annual cost for all existing large coal-fired area source boilers expected to install a fabric filter has been revised from $30,383,446 (reported in the memorandum "Revised Methodology for Estimating Impacts from Industrial, Commercial, Institutional Boilers at Area Sources of Hazardous Air Pollutant Emissions") to $42,225,467.
3.0	REFERENECS

1.	Eastern Research Group.  Estimated Impacts from the Proposed Amendments to the NESHAP for Area Sources: Industrial, Commercial, and Institutional Boilers.  November, 2011.

2.	Gibson, G., S. McClutchey, and A. Singleton, ERG.  Revised Methodology for Estimating Impacts from Industrial, Commercial, Institutional Boilers at Area Sources of Hazardous Air Pollutant Emissions.  February, 2011.


[Federal Register Volume 87, Number 199 (Monday, October 17, 2022)]
[Notices]
[Pages 62841-62842]
[FR Doc No: 2022-22484]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission

Notice of Effectiveness of Exempt Wholesale Generator Status

------------------------------------------------------------------------
                                                      Docket Nos.
------------------------------------------------------------------------
CXA Temple 2, LLC............................  EG22-158-000
Ector County Generation, LLC.................  EG22-159-000
SR Bell Buckle, LLC..........................  EG22-160-000
SR Cedar Springs, LLC........................  EG22-161-000
SR Clay, LLC.................................  EG22-162-000
SR DeSoto I, LLC.............................  EG22-163-000
SR Turkey Creek, LLC.........................  EG22-164-000
SR DeSoto I Lessee, LLC......................  EG22-165-000
Allora Solar, LLC............................  EG22-166-000
Bulldog Solar, LLC...........................  EG22-167-000
Cabin Creek Solar, LLC.......................  EG22-168-000
PGR 2021 Lessee 12, LLC......................  EG22-169-000
Gunsight Solar, LLC..........................  EG22-170-000
PGR 2021 Lessee 9, LLC.......................  EG22-171-000
PGR 2021 Lessee 11, LLC......................  EG22-172-000
PGR 2021 Lessee 13, LLC......................  EG22-173-000
PGR 2021 Lessee 15, LLC......................  EG22-174-000
PGR 2021 Lessee 19, LLC......................  EG22-175-000
Phobos Solar, LLC............................  EG22-176-000
Sonny Solar, LLC.............................  EG22-177-000
Java Solar, LLC..............................  EG22-178-000
Limestone Wind Project, LLC..................  EG22-179-000

Lockhart Solar PV, LLC.......................  EG22-180-000
Lockhart Reserve, LLC........................  EG22-181-000
Lockhart Solar PV II, LLC....................  EG22-182-000
Lockhart Transmission Holdings, LLC..........  EG22-183-000
TN Solar 1, LLC..............................  EG22-184-000
EEC Skyhawk Lessee LLC.......................  EG22-185-000
Top Hat Wind Energy LLC......................  EG22-186-000
Top Hat Wind Energy Holdings LLC.............  EG22-187-000
KCE NY 6, LLC................................  EG22-188-000
KCE TX 13, LLC...............................  EG22-189-000
KCE TX 19, LLC...............................  EG22-190-000
KCE TX 21, LLC...............................  EG22-191-000
Brotman Generating, LLC......................  EG22-192-000
Mark One II, LLC.............................  EG22-193-000
Brotman II, LLC..............................  EG22-194-000
Powells Creek Farm Solar, LLC................  EG22-195-000
Salt City Solar LLC..........................  EG22-196-000
ENGIE Solidago Solar LLC.....................  EG22-197-000
Sunnybrook Farm Solar, LLC...................  EG22-198-000
------------------------------------------------------------------------

    Take notice that during the month of September 2022, the status of
the above-captioned entities as Exempt Wholesale Generators Companies
became effective by operation of the Commission's regulations. 18 CFR
366.7(a) (2021).

    Dated: October 11, 2022.
Debbie-Anne A. Reese,
Deputy Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2022-22484 Filed 10-14-22; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6717-01-P


[Federal Register Volume 77, Number 110 (Thursday, June 7, 2012)]
[Notices]
[Page 33794]
[FR Doc No: 2012-13768]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

[Release No. 34-67097; File No. SR-ISE-2012-26]

Self-Regulatory Organizations; International Securities Exchange,
LLC; Notice of Designation of a Longer Period for Commission Action on
Proposed Rule Change To List and Trade Option Contracts Overlying 10
Shares of a Security

June 1, 2012.
    On April 9, 2012, the International Securities Exchange, LLC
(``ISE'') filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission
(``Commission''), pursuant to Section 19(b)(1) of the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934 (``Act'') \1\ and Rule 19b-4 thereunder,\2\ a
proposed rule change to list and trade option contracts overlying 10
shares of a security. The proposed rule change was published for
comment in the Federal Register on April 24, 2012.\3\ The Commission
received four comment letters on the proposal.\4\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \1\ 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(1).
    \2\ 17 CFR 240.19b-4.
    \3\ See Securities Exchange Act Release No. 66827 (April 18,
2012), 77 FR 24547.
    \4\ See letters to Elizabeth M. Murphy, Secretary, Commission,
from Christopher Nagy, Managing Director Order Routing & Market Data
Strategy, TD Ameritrade, Inc., dated April 30, 2012; Edward T.
Tilly, President and Chief Operating Officer, Chicago Board Options
Exchange, Incorporated, dated April 30, 2012; Manisha Kimmel,
Executive Director, Financial Information Forum, dated April 30,
2012; and Joan Conley, Senior Vice President & Corporate Secretary,
The NASDAQ OMX Group, Inc., dated April 30, 2012.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    Section 19(b)(2) of the Act \5\ provides that, within 45 days of
the publication of notice of the filing of a proposed rule change, or
within such longer period up to 90 days as the Commission may designate
if it finds such longer period to be appropriate and publishes its
reasons for so finding or as to which the self-regulatory organization
consents, the Commission shall either approve the proposed rule change,
disapprove the proposed rule change, or institute proceedings to
determine whether the proposed rule change should be disapproved. The
45th day for this filing is June 8, 2012. The Commission is extending
this 45-day time period.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \5\ 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(2).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    The Commission finds that it is appropriate to designate a longer
period within which to take action on the proposed rule change so that
it has sufficient time to consider the proposed rule change, the
comment letters received, and any response to the comment letters
submitted by ISE.
    Accordingly, the Commission, pursuant to Section 19(b)(2) of the
Act,\6\ designates July 23, 2012 as the date by which the Commission
should either approve or disapprove, or institute proceedings to
determine whether to disapprove, the proposed rule change (File No. SR-
ISE-2012-26).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \6\ 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(2).

    For the Commission, by the Division of Trading and Markets,
pursuant to delegated authority.\7\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \7\ 17 CFR 200.30-3(a)(31).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

Kevin M. O'Neill,
Deputy Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2012-13768 Filed 6-6-12; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 8011-01-P


[Federal Register: February 16, 2006 (Volume 71, Number 32)]
[Notices]
[Page 8292]
[DOCID:fr16fe06-52]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission

[Docket No. RP06-209-000]

Entrega Gas Pipeline LLC; Notice of Tariff Filing

February 9, 2006.
    Take notice that on January 31, 2006, Entrega Gas Pipeline LLC
(Entrega) tendered for filing as part of its FERC Gas Tariff, Original
Volume No. 1, the following tariff sheets, to be effective December 17,
2005:

First Revised Sheet No. 20
First Revised Sheet No. 20A
First Revised Sheet No. 20B
Original Sheet No. 21A

    Entrega proposes to revise these tariff sheets in order to
implement a Facility Reimbursement Fee for installation of new
facilities required to provide an interconnect with TransColorado Gas
Transmission Company.
    Entrega states that a copy of this filing has been served upon
Entrega's customers and affected state commissions.
    Any person desiring to intervene or to protest this filing must
file in accordance with Rules 211 and 214 of the Commission's Rules of
Practice and Procedure (18 CFR 385.211 and 385.214). Protests will be
considered by the Commission in determining the appropriate action to
be taken, but will not serve to make protestants parties to the
proceeding. Any person wishing to become a party must file a notice of
intervention or motion to intervene, as appropriate. Such notices,
motions, or protests must be filed in accordance with the provisions of
Section 154.210 of the Commission's regulations (18 CFR 154.210).
Anyone filing an intervention or protest must serve a copy of that
document on the Applicant. Anyone filing an intervention or protest on
or before the intervention or protest date need not serve motions to
intervene or protests on persons other than the Applicant.
    The Commission encourages electronic submission of protests and
interventions in lieu of paper using the ``eFiling'' link at http://www.ferc.gov.
 Persons unable to file electronically should submit an

original and 14 copies of the protest or intervention to the Federal
Energy Regulatory Commission, 888 First Street, NE., Washington, DC
20426.
    This filing is accessible on-line at http://www.ferc.gov, using the

``eLibrary'' link and is available for review in the Commission's
Public Reference Room in Washington, DC. There is an ``eSubscription''
link on the Web site that enables subscribers to receive e-mail
notification when a document is added to a subscribed docket(s). For
assistance with any FERC Online service, please e-mail
<EMAIL_ADDRESS>or call<PHONE_NUMBER> (toll free). For

TTY, call<PHONE_NUMBER>.

Magalie R. Salas,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. E6-2249 Filed 2-15-06; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 6717-01-P