[Federal Register: March 6, 2008 (Volume 73, Number 45)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Page 12011-12013]
[DOCID:fr06mr08-5]

=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY

40 CFR Part 52

[EPA-R03-OAR-2005-VA-0011; FRL-8537-6]

Approval and Promulgation of Air Quality Implementation Plans;
Commonwealth of Virginia; Control of Particulate Matter From Pulp and
Paper Mills; Correction

AGENCY: Environmental Protection Agency (EPA).

ACTION: Final rule; correcting amendment.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: This document corrects errors in the final rule chart listing
Virginia regulations governing kraft pulp and paper mills which EPA has
incorporated by reference into the Virginia State Implementation Plan
(SIP).

DATES: Effective Date: March 6, 2008.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Harold A. Frankford<PHONE_NUMBER> or
by e-mail at<EMAIL_ADDRESS>
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Throughout this document wherever ``we'' or
``our'' are used we mean EPA. On October 19, 2007 (72 FR 59207), we
published a final rulemaking action announcing our approval of State
Implementation Plan (SIP) revisions to Virginia regulations governing
kraft pulp and paper mills (9 VAC 5, Chapter 40, Part II, Article 13).
In that document, in the rule chart for 40 CFR 52.2420(c), for entry 5-
40-1670 published on Page 59210, we inadvertently omitted two ``added''
definitions, listed two other definitions that were not part of the SIP
revision, and removed language providing the historical status of the
definitions not affected by this EPA approval action. In addition, we
provided an incorrect amendatory instruction on Page 15209 regarding
the revised compliance provisions (5-40-1750, formerly entry 5-40-
1750A). This action (1) revises the list of definitions described in
the ``Explanation [former SIP citation]'' column for entry 5-40-1670,
and (2) corrects the erroneous amendatory instruction in part 52 for
entry 5-40-1750.
    In the Rule document E7-20568 published in the Federal Register on
October 19, 2007 (72 FR 59207),

Amendatory Instruction Number 2 on Page 59209, Third Column is revised
to read: ``In Sec.  52.2420, the table in paragraph (c) is amended by
adding an entry for 5-40-1750, removing the entry for 5-40-1750A, and
revising the entries for Article 13 (title), 5-40-1660, 5-40-1670, and
5-40-1810 to read as follows:''
    Section 553 of the Administrative Procedure Act, 5 U.S.C.
553(b)(B), provides that, when an agency for good cause finds that
notice and public procedure are impracticable, unnecessary or contrary
to the public interest, the agency may issue a rule without providing
notice and an opportunity for public comment. We have determined that
there is good cause for making today's rule final without prior
proposal and opportunity for comment because this rule is not
substantive and imposes no regulatory requirements, but merely corrects
a citation in a previous action. Thus, notice and public procedure are
unnecessary. We find that this constitutes good cause under 5 U.S.C.
553(b)(B).

Statutory and Executive Order Reviews

    Under Executive Order 12866 (58 FR 51735, October 4, 1993), this
action is not a ``significant regulatory action'' and is therefore not
subject to review by the Office of Management and Budget. For this
reason, this action is also not subject to Executive Order 13211,
``Actions Concerning Regulations That Significantly Affect Energy
Supply, Distribution, or Use'' (66 FR 28355 (May 22, 2001)). Because
the agency has made a ``good cause'' finding that this action is not
subject to notice-and-comment requirements under the Administrative
Procedures Act or any other statute as indicated in the Supplementary
Information section above, it is not subject to the regulatory
flexibility provisions of the Regulatory Flexibility Act (5 U.S.C 601
et seq.), or to sections 202 and 205 of the Unfunded Mandates Reform
Act of 1995 (UMRA) (Pub. L. 104-4). In addition, this action does not
significantly or uniquely affect small governments or impose a
significant intergovernmental mandate, as described in sections 203 and
204 of UMRA. This rule also does not have a substantial direct effect
on one or more Indian tribes, on the relationship between the Federal
Government and Indian tribes, or on the distribution of power and
responsibilities between the Federal Government and Indian tribes, as
specified by Executive Order 13175 (65 FR 67249, November 9, 2000), nor
will it have substantial direct effects on the States, on the
relationship between the national government and the States, or on the
distribution of power and responsibilities among the various levels of
governments, as specified by Executive Order 13132 (64 FR 43255, August
10, 1999). This rule also is not subject to Executive Order 13045 (62
FR 19885, April 23, 1997), because it approves a state rule
implementing a Federal standard.
    This technical correction action does not involve technical
standards; thus the requirements of section 12(d) of the National
Technology Transfer and Advancement Act of 1995 (15 U.S.C. 272 note) do
not apply. The rule also does not involve special consideration of
environmental justice related issues as required by Executive Order
12898 (59 FR 7629, February 16, 1994). In issuing this rule, EPA has
taken the necessary steps to eliminate drafting errors and ambiguity,
minimize potential litigation, and provide a clear legal standard for
affected conduct, as required by section 3 of Executive Order 12988 (61
FR 4729, February 7, 1996). EPA has complied with Executive Order 12630
(53 FR 8859, March 15, 1998) by examining the takings implications of
the rule in accordance with the ``Attorney General's Supplemental
Guidelines for the Evaluation of Risk and Avoidance of Unanticipated
Takings'' issued under the executive order. This rule does not impose
an information collection burden under the Paperwork Reduction Act of
1995 (44 U.S.C. 3501 et seq).
    The Congressional Review Act (5 U.S.C. 801 et seq.), as added by
the Small Business Regulatory Enforcement Fairness Act of 1996,
generally provides that before a rule may take effect, the agency
promulgating the rule must submit a rule report, which includes a copy
of the rule, to each House of the Congress and to the Comptroller
General of the United States. Section 808 allows the issuing agency to
make a rule effective sooner than otherwise provided by the CRA if the
agency makes a good cause finding that notice and public procedure is
impracticable, unnecessary or contrary to the public interest. This
determination must be supported by a brief statement. 5 U.S.C. 808(2).
As stated previously, EPA had made such a good cause finding, including
the reasons therefore, and established an effective date of March 6,
2008. EPA will submit a report containing this rule and other required
information to the U.S. Senate, the U.S. House of Representatives, and
the Comptroller General of the United States prior to publication of
the rule in the Federal Register. This correction to the table in 40
CFR 52.2420(c) for Virginia is not a ``major rule'' as defined by 5
U.S.C. 804(2).

List of Subjects in 40 CFR Part 52

    Environmental protection, Air pollution control, Incorporation by
reference, Particulate matter, Reporting and recordkeeping
requirements.

    Dated: February 25, 2008.
Donald S. Welsh,
Regional Administrator, Region III.

0
40 CFR part 52 is amended as follows:

PART 52--[AMENDED]

0
1. The authority citation for 40 CFR part 52 continues to read as
follows:

    Authority: 42 U.S.C. 7401 et seq.

Subpart VV--Virginia

0
2. In Sec.  52.2420, the table in paragraph (c) is amended by adding an
entry for 5-40-1750, removing the entry for 5-40-1750A, and revising
the entries for Article 13 (title), 5-40-1660, 5-40-1670, and 5-40-1810
to read as follows:

Sec.  52.2420  Identification of plan.

* * * * *
    (c) * * *

                                 EPA-Approved Virginia Regulations and Statutes
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
                                                             State
     State citation (9 VAC 5)           Title/subject      effective    EPA approval    Explanation [former SIP
                                                              date          date               citation]
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

                                                  * * * * * * *
                                     Chapter 40 Existing Stationary Sources

                                                  * * * * * * *
                                           Part II Emission Standards

                                                  * * * * * * *
                    Article 13 Emission Standards From Kraft Pulp and Paper Mills (Rule 4-13)
5-40-1660.........................  Applicability and         4/01/99    10/19/07, 72  .........................
                                     designation of                          FR 59207
                                     affected facilities.
5-40-1670.........................  Definitions.........      4/01/99    10/19/07, 72  Existing: Kraft pulp
                                                                             FR 59207   mill, Lime kiln,
                                                                                Recovery furnace, Smelt
                                                                                dissolving tank.
                                                                                Added: Black liquor
                                                                                solids, Green liquor
                                                                                sulfidity, Neutral
                                                                                sulfite semichemical
                                                                                pulping operation, New
                                                                                design recovery furnace,
                                                                                Pulp and paper mill,
                                                                                Semichemical pulping
                                                                                process;
                                                                                Revised: Cross recovery
                                                                                furnace, Straight kraft
                                                                                recovery furnace.
                                                                                Remaining definitions are
                                                                                Federally enforceable as
                                                                                part of the Section
                                                                                111(d) plan for kraft
                                                                                pulp mills (see, Sec.
                                                                                62.11610).

                                                  * * * * * * *
5-40-1750.........................  Compliance..........      4/01/99    10/19/07, 72  .........................
                                                                             FR 59207

                                                  * * * * * * *
5-40-1810.........................  Permits.............      4/01/99    10/19/07, 72  .........................
                                                                             FR 59207

                                                  * * * * * * *
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

* * * * *
[FR Doc. E8-4236 Filed 3-5-08; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 6560-50-P


[Federal Register Volume 81, Number 132 (Monday, July 11, 2016)]
[Notices]
[Pages 44922-44923]
[FR Doc No: 2016-16068]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION

Pipeline and Hazardous Materials Safety Administration

 Hazardous Materials: Actions on Special Permit Applications

AGENCY: Office of Hazardous Materials Safety, Pipeline and Hazardous
Materials Safety Administration (PHMSA), DOT.

ACTION: Notice of actions on special permit applications.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: In accordance with the procedures governing the application
for, and the processing of, special permits from the Department of
Transportation's Hazardous Material Regulations (49 CFR part 107,
subpart B), notice is hereby given of the actions on special permits
applications in (October to October 2014). The mode of transportation
involved are identified by a number in the ``Nature of Application''
portion of the table below as follows: 1--Motor vehicle, 2--Rail
freight, 3--Cargo vessel, 4--Cargo aircraft only, 5--Passenger-carrying
aircraft. Application numbers prefixed by the letters EE represent
applications for Emergency Special Permits. It should be noted that
some of the sections cited were those in effect at the

time certain special permits were issued.

    Issued in Washington, DC, on June 28, 2016.
Ryan Paquet,
Director, Approvals and Permits.

------------------------------------------------------------------------
                                                                  Nature
                                                                    of
       S.P. No.             Applicant         Regulation(s)      special
                                                                  permit
                                                                 thereof
------------------------------------------------------------------------
                   MODIFICATION SPECIAL PERMIT GRANTED
------------------------------------------------------------------------
14751-M...............  Univation         49 CFR 173.242.......    To
                         Technologies,                           modify
                         LLC, Houston,                            the
                         TX.                                     special
                                                                 permit
                                                                   to
                                                                 authori
                                                                   ze
                                                                 adding
                                                                 additio
                                                                  nal
                                                                 drawing
                                                                   s.
------------------------------------------------------------------------
                       NEW SPECIAL PERMIT GRANTED
------------------------------------------------------------------------
16571-N...............  Chevron USA       49 CFR 172.101           To
                         Inc., Picayune,   Hazardous Materials   authori
                         MS.               Table Column (9A).    ze the
                                                                 transpo
                                                                 rtation
                                                                   in
                                                                 commerc
                                                                 e of
                                                                 certain
                                                                 hazardo
                                                                   us
                                                                 materia
                                                                   ls
                                                                 which
                                                                 exceed
                                                                  the
                                                                 authori
                                                                  zed
                                                                 quantit
                                                                    y
                                                                 limitat
                                                                 ions or
                                                                  are
                                                                 forbidd
                                                                   en
                                                                 aboard
                                                                 passeng
                                                                  er-
                                                                 carryin
                                                                    g
                                                                 aircraf
                                                                   t.
                                                                 (mode
                                                                   5)
------------------------------------------------------------------------
                                 DENIED
------------------------------------------------------------------------
16495-N...............  Request by TransRail Innovation Inc. Calgary,
                         May 06, 2016. To authorize the manufacture,
                         installation, and service trials of 50 rail
                         tank cars containing Class 3 hazardous
                         materials each with a sensor device mounted to
                         the rail tank car prior to, or in conjunction
                         with, the completion of tile quality assurance
                         program for the tank car facility.
------------------------------------------------------------------------

[FR Doc. 2016-16068 Filed 7-8-16; 8:45 am]
 BILLING CODE 4909-60-M


[Federal Register Volume 77, Number 225 (Wednesday, November 21, 2012)]
[Notices]
[Pages 69925-69926]
[FR Doc No: 2012-28245]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION

Pipeline and Hazardous Materials Safety Administration

[Docket No. PHMSA-2012-0301; Notice No. 12-10]

Assessment of Hazardous Materials Incident Data Collection,
Analysis, Reporting, and Use

AGENCY: Pipeline and Hazardous Materials Safety Administration (PHMSA),
DOT.

ACTION: Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: This notice is a request for comments and information to be
used for an assessment to improve the collection, analysis, reporting,
and use of data related to accidents and incidents involving the
transportation of hazardous materials. This notice is being conducted
in support of the ``Moving Ahead for Progress in the 21st Century''
(MAP-21) Act.

DATES: Comments must be received by December 28, 2012.

ADDRESSES: You may submit comments by identification of the docket
number (PHMSA-2012-12-10) by any of the following methods:
     Federal eRulemaking Portal: Go to http://www.regulations.gov. Follow the online instructions for submitting
comments.
     Fax: 1-202-493-2251.
     Mail: Docket Operations, U.S. Department of
Transportation, West Building, Ground Floor, Room W12-140, Routing
Symbol M-30, 1200 New Jersey Avenue SE., Washington, DC 20590.
     Hand Delivery: To Docket Operations, Room W12-140 on the
ground floor of the West Building, 1200 New Jersey Avenue SE.,
Washington, DC 20590, between 9 a.m. and 5 p.m., Monday through Friday,
except Federal holidays.
    Instructions: All submissions must include the agency name and
docket number for this notice at the beginning of the comment. All
comments received will be posted without change to the Federal Docket
Management System (FDMS), including any personal information.
    Docket: For access to the dockets to read background documents or
comments received, go to http://www.regulations.gov or DOT's Docket
Operations Office (see ADDRESSES).
    Privacy Act: Anyone is able to search the electronic form of any
written communications and comments received into any of our dockets by
the name of the individual submitting the document (or signing the
document, if submitted on behalf of an association, business, labor
union, etc.). You may review DOT's complete Privacy Act Statement in
the Federal Register published on April 11, 2000 (Volume 65, Number 70;
Pages 19477-78).

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Mr. David Lehman or Ms. Yolanda
Braxton, Office of Hazardous Materials Safety, Department of
Transportation, Washington, DC 20590;<PHONE_NUMBER>.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

I. Background

    PHMSA, and its predecessor agency the Research and Special Programs

Administration (RSPA), have collected hazardous materials incident
reports for over 40 years. The Hazardous Materials Regulations (HMR; 49
CFR Parts 171-180) establish requirements for an immediate report (see
Sec.  171.15) and a detailed incident report (Form DOT F5800.1; see
Sec.  171.16). Over 500,000 detailed incident reports have been
collected over time. The incident data and information is generally
used by PHMSA to:
    1. Evaluate regulatory effectiveness;
    2. Determine the need for regulatory changes to address changing
transportation safety problems;
    3. Identify major problem or risk areas that should receive
priority attention;
    4. Chart trends;
    5. Identify problems and training inadequacies;
    6. Evaluate packages and packaging;
    7. Assess ways to reduce releases;
    8. Aid the targeting of enforcement activities; and
    9. Assist in evaluating fitness for special permits and approvals.

II. Purpose of This Notice

    Section 33006(a) of MAP-21 (Pub. L. 112-141 Sec.  33006(a), 126
Stat. 835, July 6, 2012) requires the Department to conduct an
assessment to improve the collection, analysis, reporting, and use of
data related to accidents and incidents involving the transportation of
hazardous materials.
    Section 33006(b) requires the Department to rely on the results of
the assessment to develop an action plan and timeline for improving the
collection, analysis, reporting, and use of data related to accidents
and incidents involving the transportation of hazardous materials.
    The provisions of MAP-21 set an expedited timeline, with the
assessment due not later than six months after the date of enactment
(Sec.  33006(a)) and the action plan due three months after (Sec.
33006(b)). Upon completion of the action plan and timeline the agency
has fifteen days to submit them to Congress (Sec.  33006(c)).
    In this notice, PHMSA is soliciting information, comments, and
inputs related to the required elements of the assessment contained in
MAP-21. Specifically, please provide comments on your view of the
methods used by PHMSA to collect, analyze, report, and use data. Also,
please provide comments on the adequacy of and suggestions for
improvement to:
    1. Information requested on the accident and incident reporting
forms required to be submitted to PHMSA;
    2. Methods used by PHMSA to verify that the information provided on
such forms is accurate and complete;
    3. Accident and incident reporting requirements, including whether
such requirements should be expanded to include shippers and consignees
of hazardous materials;
    4. Resources of PHMSA related to data collection, analysis, and
reporting, including staff and information technology; and
    5. The database used by PHMSA for recording and reporting such
accidents and incidents, including the ability of users to adequately
search the database and find information.

    Issued in Washington, DC, on November 15, 2012 under authority
delegated in 49 CFR Part 1.
Magdy El-Sibaie,
Associate Administrator for Hazardous Materials Safety, Pipeline and
Hazardous Materials Safety Administration.
[FR Doc. 2012-28245 Filed 11-20-12; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910-60-P


[Federal Register: May 21, 2010 (Volume 75, Number 98)]
[Notices]
[Page 28610-28612]
[DOCID:fr21my10-78]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY

[FRL-9154-2; Docket ID No. EPA-HQ-ORD-2010-0395]

Draft EPA's Reanalysis of Key Issues Related to Dioxin Toxicity
and Response to NAS Comments

AGENCY: Environmental Protection Agency (EPA).

ACTION: Notice of Public Comment Period.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: EPA is announcing a 90-day public comment period for the
external review draft entitled, ``EPA's Reanalysis of Key Issues
Related to Dioxin Toxicity and Response to NAS Comments'' (EPA/600/R-
10/038A). This draft report responds to the key recommendations and
comments included in the National Academy of Sciences (NAS) 2006
report. In addition, it includes new analyses on potential human
effects that may result from exposure to 2,3,7,8-tetrachlorodibenzo-p-
dioxin (TCDD). These analyses have not been in previous versions of
draft reports related to EPA's dioxin reassessment activity. This draft
report is now considered to be under EPA's Integrated Risk Information
System (IRIS) program, and thus, the new IRIS process announced in May
2009 (http://www.epa.gov/iris/process/) is being followed. Per the May
2009 process, this draft report is beginning Step 4--independent
external peer review and public review and comment. This draft dioxin
report was prepared by the National Center for Environmental Assessment
(NCEA) within the EPA Office of Research and Development (ORD).
    The draft document, ``EPA's Reanalysis of Key Issues Related to
Dioxin Toxicity and Response to NAS Comments,'' is also being provided
to EPA's Science Advisory Board (SAB), a body established under the
Federal Advisory Committee Act, for independent external peer review.
The SAB will convene an expert panel composed of scientists
knowledgeable about technical issues related to dioxins and risk
assessment. The SAB is expected to hold a public teleconference on or
about June 24, 2010, and a public panel meeting on July 13-15, 2010.
The SAB peer review meetings will be announced by the SAB staff office
in a separate Federal Register Notice. EPA intends to forward all
public comments submitted before July 7, 2010, in response to this
notice to the SAB peer review panel for their consideration. Members of
the public who wish to ensure that their technical comments are
provided to the SAB expert panel before each meeting should also e-mail
their comments separately to Thomas Armitage, the SAB Designated
Federal Officer at<EMAIL_ADDRESS>following the procedures in
the Federal Register Notice announcing the SAB public meetings. When
completing this draft dioxin report, EPA will consider any written
public comments that EPA receives in accordance with the detailed
instructions provided below under SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION. The public
comment period and SAB external peer review are independent processes
that provide separate opportunities for all interested parties to
comment on the draft report.
    EPA is releasing this draft report solely for the purpose of pre-
dissemination peer review under applicable information quality
guidelines. This draft report has not been formally disseminated by
EPA. It does not represent and should not be construed to represent any
Agency policy or determination.

DATES: The public comment period begins May 21, 2010, and ends August
19, 2010. Comments should be in writing and must be received by EPA by
August 19, 2010.
    Due to the timing of the SAB's peer review meeting, EPA can only
guarantee that those comments received by July 7, 2010, in response to
this Federal Register notice will be provided to the SAB panel prior to
the SAB meeting. Comments received after July 7, will still be provided
to the SAB panel and will also inform the Agency's revision of the
draft report.

ADDRESSES: The external review draft titled, ``EPA's Reanalysis of Key
Issues Related to Dioxin Toxicity and Response to NAS Comments'' (EPA/
600/R-10/038A) is available primarily via the Internet on the NCEA home
page under the Recent Additions and Publications menus at http://
www.epa.gov/ncea. A limited number of paper copies are available from
the Information Management Team (Address: Information Management Team,
National Center for Environmental Assessment (Mail Code: 8601P), U.S.
Environmental Protection Agency, 1200 Pennsylvania Avenue, NW.,
Washington, DC 20460; telephone:<PHONE_NUMBER>; facsimile: 703-347-
8691). If you request a paper copy,

please provide your name, mailing address, and the assessment title.
    Comments may be submitted electronically via http://
www.regulations.gov, by e-mail, by mail, by facsimile, or by hand
delivery/courier. Please follow the detailed instructions provided in
the SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION section of this notice.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: For information on the docket,
regulations.gov or public comment period, please contact the Office of
Environmental Information (OEI) Docket (Mail Code: 2822T), U.S.
Environmental Protection Agency, 1200 Pennsylvania Ave., NW.,
Washington, DC 20460; telephone:<PHONE_NUMBER>; facsimile:<PHONE_NUMBER>;
or e-mail<EMAIL_ADDRESS>    For information on the draft report, please contact Linda C. Tuxen,
National Center for Environmental Assessment (8601P), U.S.
Environmental Protection Agency, 1200 Pennsylvania Avenue, NW.,
Washington, DC 20460; telephone:<PHONE_NUMBER>; facsimile:<PHONE_NUMBER>;
or e-mail<EMAIL_ADDRESS>
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

I. Information About the Draft Report, ``EPA's Reanalysis of Key Issues
Related to Dioxin Toxicity and Response to NAS Comments''

    In 2003, EPA, along with other federal agencies, asked the NAS to
review aspects of the science in EPA's draft dioxin reassessment
entitled, ``Exposure and Human Health Reassessment of 2,3,7,8-
Tetrachlorodibenzo-p-Dioxin (TCDD) and Related Compounds,'' and, in
2004, EPA sent a 2003 external review draft dioxin reassessment to the
NAS for their peer review. The NAS held several public meetings during
their review of the draft reassessment and on July 11, 2006, released
the final report of their review entitled, ``Health Risks from Dioxin
and Related Compounds: Evaluation of the EPA Reassessment.''
    The NAS identified three key areas in the 2003 draft reassessment
that required substantial improvement to support a more scientifically
robust risk characterization. These three areas were: (1) Justification
of approaches to dose-response modeling for cancer and non-cancer
endpoints; (2) transparency and clarity in selection of key data sets
for analysis; and (3) transparency, thoroughness, and clarity in
quantitative uncertainty analysis. The NAS provided EPA with
recommendations to address their key concerns.
    EPA's draft dioxin report, which is being provided for public
review and comment, includes significant new analyses on both the
potential cancer and noncancer human health effects that may result
from exposures to TCDD. For instance, this draft report addresses the
explicit recommendation of the NAS to develop a quantitative risk
estimate for noncancer effects that may result from long-term (chronic)
oral exposure to dioxins. Thus, this draft dioxin report includes an
oral reference dose (RfD) for TCDD--the most well-studied and
considered to be among the most toxic of the dioxin-like compounds. An
RfD was not in the 2003 draft dioxin reassessment.
    In addition, in 2003, EPA and other federal agencies developed a
set of questions and answers related to dioxins, which have been
updated about every year and a half. These materials have again been
updated to include more recent information. These questions and answers
provide general information on dioxins such as what they are, where
they can be found, and major sources of dioxins. They also discuss
possible effects of dioxin exposure in humans, include advice about
consumption of food that might contain dioxins, and explain the review
process for the dioxin reassessment. For additional information on
dioxins and on EPA's overall dioxin assessment activity, these
questions and answers may be accessed at: http://www.fda.gov/Food/
FoodSafety/FoodContaminantsAdulteration/ChemicalContaminants/
DioxinsPCBs/ucm077524.htm.

II. How To Submit Comments to the Docket at http://www.regulations.gov

    Submit your comments, identified by Docket ID No. EPA-HQ-ORD-2010-
0395, by one of the following methods:
     http://www.regulations.gov: Follow the on-line
instructions for submitting comments.
     E-mail<EMAIL_ADDRESS>     Facsimile:<PHONE_NUMBER>.
     Mail: Office of Environmental Information (OEI) Docket
(Mail Code: 2822T), U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, 1200
Pennsylvania Ave., NW., Washington, DC 20460. The telephone number is
202-566-1752. If you provide comments by mail, please submit one
unbound original with pages numbered consecutively, and three copies of
the comments. For attachments, provide an index, number pages
consecutively with the comments, and submit an unbound original and
three copies.
     Hand Delivery: The OEI Docket is located in the EPA
Headquarters Docket Center, EPA West Building, Room 3334, 1301
Constitution Ave., NW., Washington, DC. The EPA Docket Center Public
Reading Room is open from 8:30 a.m. to 4:30 p.m., Monday through
Friday, excluding legal holidays. The telephone number for the Public
Reading Room is<PHONE_NUMBER>. Deliveries are only accepted during the
docket's normal hours of operation, and special arrangements should be
made for deliveries of boxed information. If you provide comments by
hand delivery, please submit one unbound original with pages numbered
consecutively, and three copies of the comments. For attachments,
provide an index, number pages consecutively with the comments, and
submit an unbound original and three copies.
    Instructions: Direct your comments to Docket ID No. EPA-HQ-ORD-
2010-0395. Please ensure that your comments are submitted within the
specified comment period. Comments received after the closing date will
be marked ``late,'' and may only be considered if time permits. It is
EPA's policy to include all comments it receives in the public docket
without change and to make the comments available online at http://
www.regulations.gov, including any personal information provided,
unless comments include information claimed to be Confidential Business
Information (CBI) or other information whose disclosure is restricted
by statute. Do not submit information that you consider to be CBI or
otherwise protected through http://www.regulations.gov or e-mail. The
http://www.regulations.gov Web site is an ``anonymous access'' system,
which means EPA will not know your identity or contact information
unless you provide it in the body of your comments. If you send e-mail
comments directly to EPA without going through http://
www.regulations.gov, your e-mail address will be automatically captured
and included as part of the comments that are placed in the public
docket and made available on the Internet. If you submit electronic
comments, EPA recommends that you include your name and other contact
information in the body of your comments and with any disk or CD-ROM
you submit. If EPA cannot read your comments due to technical
difficulties and cannot contact you for clarification, EPA may not be
able to consider your comments. Electronic files should avoid the use
of special characters and any form of encryption and be free of any
defects or viruses. For additional information about EPA's public
docket, visit the EPA Docket Center homepage at http://www.epa.gov/
epahome/dockets.htm.
    Docket: All documents in the docket are listed in the http://
www.regulations.gov index. Although

listed in the index, some information is not publicly available, e.g.,
CBI or other information whose disclosure is restricted by statute.
Certain other material, such as copyrighted material, will be publicly
available only in hard copy. Publicly available docket materials are
available either electronically at http://www.regulations.gov or in
hard copy at the OEI Docket in the EPA Headquarters Docket Center.

    Dated: May 17, 2010.
Rebecca Clark,
Acting Director, National Center for Environmental Assessment.
[FR Doc. 2010-12280 Filed 5-20-10; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6560-50-P


[Federal Register Volume 81, Number 70 (Tuesday, April 12, 2016)]
[Notices]
[Page 21646]
[FR Doc No: 2016-08311]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION

Federal Aviation Administration

[Summary Notice No. PE-2016-38]

Petition for Exemption; Summary of Petition Received; Walt Disney
Parks and Resorts U.S., Inc.

AGENCY: Federal Aviation Administration (FAA), DOT.

ACTION: Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: This notice contains a summary of a petition seeking relief
from specified requirements of title 14 of the Code of Federal
Regulations. The purpose of this notice is to improve the public's
awareness of, and participation in, the FAA's exemption process.
Neither publication of this notice nor the inclusion or omission of
information in the summary is intended to affect the legal status of
the petition or its final disposition.

DATES: Comments on this petition must identify the petition docket
number and must be received on or before May 2, 2016.

ADDRESSES: Send comments identified by docket number FAA-2015-8680
using any of the following methods:
     Federal eRulemaking Portal: Go to http://www.regulations.gov and follow the online instructions for sending your
comments electronically.
     Mail: Send comments to Docket Operations, M-30; U.S.
Department of Transportation (DOT), 1200 New Jersey Avenue SE., Room
W12-140, West Building Ground Floor, Washington, DC 20590-0001.
     Hand Delivery or Courier: Take comments to Docket
Operations in Room W12-140 of the West Building Ground Floor at 1200
New Jersey Avenue SE., Washington, DC, between 9 a.m. and 5 p.m.,
Monday through Friday, except Federal holidays.
     Fax: Fax comments to Docket Operations at<PHONE_NUMBER>.
    Privacy: In accordance with 5 U.S.C. 553(c), DOT solicits comments
from the public to better inform its rulemaking process. DOT posts
these comments, without edit, including any personal information the
commenter provides, to http://www.regulations.gov, as described in the
system of records notice (DOT/ALL-14 FDMS), which can be reviewed at
http://www.dot.gov/privacy.
    Docket: Background documents or comments received may be read at
http://www.regulations.gov at any time. Follow the online instructions
for accessing the docket or go to the Docket Operations in Room W12-140
of the West Building Ground Floor at 1200 New Jersey Avenue SE.,
Washington, DC, between 9 a.m. and 5 p.m., Monday through Friday,
except Federal holidays.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Dan Ngo,<PHONE_NUMBER>, 800
Independence Avenue SW., Washington, DC 20591.
    This notice is published pursuant to 14 CFR 11.85.

    Issued in Washington, DC, on April 1, 2016.
James M. Crotty,
Acting Director, Office of Rulemaking.

Petition for Exemption

    Docket No.: FAA-2015-8680.
    Petitioner: Walt Disney Parks and Resorts U.S., Inc.
    Section(s) of 14 CFR Affected: Parts 21, 61, and 67; and Sec. Sec.
91.111, 91.113, 91.119(c), 91.121, 91.151(a), 91.309, 91.311,
91.403(b), 91.405(a), 91.407(a)(1), 91.409(a)(2), and 91.417.
    Description of Relief Sought: The petitioner is requesting relief
in order to fly up to fifty small unmanned aircraft at once within the
Disney Resorts' existing no-fly zone at night. The petitioner also
seeks relief from the requirement of Certificated Pilots and Medical
certificates.

[FR Doc. 2016-08311 Filed 4-11-16; 8:45 a.m.]
 BILLING CODE 4910-13-P


[Federal Register Volume 85, Number 22 (Monday, February 3, 2020)]
[Notices]
[Pages 5965-5966]
[FR Doc No: 2020-01992]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES

Food and Drug Administration

[Docket No. FDA-2013-N-0719]

Agency Information Collection Activities; Submission for Office
of Management and Budget Review; Comment Request; Planning for the
Effects of High Absenteeism To Ensure Availability of Medically
Necessary Drug Products

AGENCY: Food and Drug Administration, HHS.

ACTION: Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Food and Drug Administration (FDA) is announcing that a
proposed collection of information has been submitted to the Office of
Management and Budget (OMB) for review and clearance under the
Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995.

DATES: Fax written comments on the collection of information by March
4, 2020.

ADDRESSES: To ensure that comments on the information collection are
received, OMB recommends that written comments be faxed to the Office
of Information and Regulatory Affairs, OMB, Attn: FDA Desk Officer,
Fax:<PHONE_NUMBER>, or emailed to<EMAIL_ADDRESS>All
comments should be identified with the OMB control number 0910-0675.
Also include the FDA docket number found in brackets in the heading of
this document.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Domini Bean, Office of Operations,
Food and Drug Administration, Three White Flint North, 10A-12M, 11601
Landsdown St., North Bethesda, MD 20852,<PHONE_NUMBER>,
<EMAIL_ADDRESS>
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: In compliance with 44 U.S.C. 3507, FDA has
submitted the following proposed collection of information to OMB for
review and clearance.

Planning for the Effects of High Absenteeism To Ensure Availability of
Medically Necessary Drug Products

OMB Control Number 0910-0675--Extension

    This information collection supports recommendations found in
Agency guidance. Specifically, we have developed guidance intended to
encourage manufacturers of drug and therapeutic biological products,
and any raw materials and components used in those products, to develop
a written Emergency Plan (Plan) for maintaining an adequate supply of
medically necessary drug products (MNPs) during an emergency that
results in high employee absenteeism. The guidance entitled, ``Planning
for the Effects of High Absenteeism to Ensure Availability of Medically
Necessary Drug Products,'' discusses the elements that should be
covered by such a Plan, and is available from our website at: https://www.fda.gov/regulatory-information/search-fda-guidance-documents/planning-effects-high-absenteeism-ensure-availability-medically-necessary-drug-products.
    In the Federal Register of October 25, 2019 (84 FR 57448), we
published a 60-day notice requesting public comment on the proposed
collection of information. No comments were received.
    We estimate the burden of this collection of information as
follows:

                                                     Table 1--Estimated Annual Reporting Burden \1\
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
                                                                                Number of
                              Activity                                  Number of      responses per     Total annual    Average burden    Total hours
                                                                       respondents       respondent       responses       per response
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Activate/deactivate Plan as recommended in the guidance............               2                1                2               16               32
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
\1\ There are no capital costs or operating and maintenance costs associated with this collection of information.

                                                   Table 2--Estimated Annual Recordkeeping Burden \1\
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
                                                                                Number of                       Average burden
                              Activity                                  Number of       records per      Total annual         per          Total hours
                                                                      recordkeepers     recordkeeper       records        recordkeeper
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Develop initial Plan as recommended in the guidance................              70                1               70              250           17,500
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
\1\ There are no capital costs or operating and maintenance costs associated with this collection of information.

    As explained in the guidance, we provide recommendations for
developing and implementing a written Plan, including: (1) Identifying
a person or position title (as well as two designated alternates) with
the authority to activate and deactivate the Plan and make decisions
during the emergency; (2) prioritizing the manufacturer's drug products
based on medical necessity; (3) identifying actions that should be
taken prior to an anticipated period of high absenteeism; (4)
identifying criteria for activating the Plan; (5) performing quality
risk assessments to determine which manufacturing activities may be
reduced to enable the company to meet a demand for MNPs; (6) returning
to normal operations and conducting a post-execution assessment of the
execution outcomes; and (7) testing the Plan.
    The guidance also encourages manufacturers to include and document
procedures in the Plan for notifying the FDA Center for Drug Evaluation
and Research (CDER) when the Plan is activated and when returning to
normal operations. The guidance recommends that these notifications
occur within 1 day of a Plan's activation and within 1 day of a Plan's
deactivation. The guidance identifies the information that should be
included in these notifications, such as which drug products will be
manufactured under altered procedures, which products' manufacturing
will be temporarily delayed, and any anticipated or potential drug
shortages. We assume two notifications (for purposes of this analysis,
we consider an activation and a deactivation notification to equal one
notification) will be submitted to CDER annually, and assume each
notification requires 16 hours to prepare and submit.
    Finally, the guidance recommends developing a Plan for each
individual manufacturing facility as well as a broader Plan that
addresses multiple sites within the organization. For purposes of this
information collection analysis, we consider the Plan for an individual
manufacturing facility and the broader Plan to comprise one Plan for
each manufacturer. Based on available data on the number of
manufacturers that would be covered by the guidance, we previously
estimated 70 manufacturers will develop a Plan as recommended by the
guidance (i.e., one Plan per manufacturer, to include all manufacturing
facilities, sites, and drug products) and that each Plan would take
approximately 500 hours to develop. Upon development of the plan,
however, we believe fewer hours are necessary to maintain and update it
as needed. As FDA issued the guidance in 2011, we now assume that most
respondents have developed the recommended plan, and therefore we limit
our current burden estimate to updates and maintenance. Accordingly, we
have reduced our estimate by half, reasoning that, although it takes
fewer hours for updates and maintenance, new respondents may choose to
adopt recommendations found in the guidance.

    Dated: January 24, 2020.
Lowell J. Schiller,
Principal Associate Commissioner for Policy.
[FR Doc. 2020-01992 Filed 1-31-20; 8:45 am]
 BILLING CODE 4164-01-P


[Federal Register Volume 85, Number 250 (Wednesday, December 30, 2020)]
[Notices]
[Pages 86598-86599]
[FR Doc No: 2020-28891]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

[Release No. 34-90793; File No. SR-NASDAQ-2020-090]

Self-Regulatory Organizations; The Nasdaq Stock Market LLC;
Notice of Filing of Proposed Rule Change To Amend Equity 4, Section
4703

December 23, 2020.
    Pursuant to Section 19(b)(1) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934
(``Act''),\1\ and Rule 19b-4 thereunder,\2\ notice is hereby given that
on December 15, 2020, The Nasdaq Stock Market LLC (``Nasdaq'' or
``Exchange'') filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission
(``Commission'') the proposed rule change as described in Items I and
II below, which Items have been prepared by the Exchange. The
Commission is publishing this notice to solicit comments on the
proposed rule change from interested persons.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \1\ 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(1).
    \2\ 17 CFR 240.19b-4.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

I. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement of the Terms of Substance
of the Proposed Rule Change

    The Exchange proposes to amend Equity 4, Section 4703, as described
below.
    The text of the proposed rule change is available on the Exchange's
website at https://listingcenter.nasdaq.com/rulebook/nasdaq/rules, at
the principal office of the Exchange, and at the Commission's Public
Reference Room.

II. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement of the Purpose of, and
Statutory Basis for, the Proposed Rule Change

    In its filing with the Commission, the Exchange included statements
concerning the purpose of and basis for the proposed rule change and
discussed any comments it received on the proposed rule change. The
text of these statements may be examined at the places specified in
Item IV below. The Exchange has prepared summaries, set forth in
sections A, B, and C below, of the most significant aspects of such
statements.

A. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement of the Purpose of, and
Statutory Basis for, the Proposed Rule Change

1. Purpose
    The Exchange proposes to amend Equity 4, Section 4703(h), which
describes Orders with ``Reserve Size,'' \3\ to clarify its existing
practice relating to replenishments of such Orders. As set forth in
Section 4703(h), ``Reserve Size'' is an Order Attribute that permits a
Participant to stipulate that an Order Type that is Displayed may have
its displayed size replenished from additional non-displayed size.\4\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \3\ Securities Exchange Act Release No. 34-79290 (November 10,
2016), 81 FR 81184 (November 17, 2016) (SR-NASDAQ-2016-111).
    \4\ An Order with Reserve Size may be referred to as a ``Reserve
Order.''
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    The Exchange established the Reserve Orders with the intention that
it would always act as a provider of liquidity upon replenishment.
Indeed, this is what participants have come to expect from the
operation of Reserve Orders.
    In late 2016, however, a rule filing introduced a rare circumstance
where a Reserve Order, upon replenishment of its Displayed Order
component, theoretically could become a liquidity remover under the
existing Exchange Rules.
    An example of the rare theoretical circumstance is as follows.
Order 1 is a Price to Comply Order to buy at $10.00 resting on the
Nasdaq book with 100 shares displayed and 3,000 shares in reserve (for
a total order size of 3,100 shares). Order 2 is an Order to sell 100
shares at $10.00, which executes against the 100 displayed shares from
Order 1 upon entry. Order 3 is a Post Only order to sell 1,000 shares
at $10.00 that is entered and posts to the Book before Order 1 has been
replenished. Following the rules of the Post Only Order Type, Order 3
does not execute against the non-displayed interest resting at $10.00,
but instead posts at the locking price. Therefore, upon replenishment,
the new 100 shares of Order 1 would lock Order 3 at $10.00. As directed
by the rule governing Price to Comply Orders,\5\ Order 1 would execute
against Order 3 at $10.00 as a liquidity taker.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \5\ Pursuant to Equity 4, Section 4702(b)(1)(A), a ``Price to
Comply Order'' is an Order Type designed to comply with Rule 610(d)
under Regulation NMS by avoiding the display of quotations that lock
or cross any Protected Quotation in a System Security during Market
Hours. The Price to Comply Order is also designed to provide
potential price improvement. When a Price to Comply Order is
entered, the Price to Comply Order will be executed against
previously posted Orders on the Exchange Book that are priced equal
to or better than the price of the Price to Comply Order, up to the
full amount of such previously posted Orders, unless such executions
would trade through a Protected Quotation.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    The Exchange did not account for this scenario when drafting its
rules. In fact, the Exchange does not presently handle this scenario as
described above. Instead, upon replenishment, the Exchange reprices the
new displayed Price to Comply Order such that it does not execute
against Order 3 as a liquidity taker.
    However, the Exchange now proposes to eliminate any unintended
inconsistency as to how it handles this scenario and make clear in its
Rules that a Reserve Order is an adder of liquidity after posting on
the Nasdaq Book in all circumstances. Specifically, the Exchange
proposes to amend the Rule to state that if the new Displayed Order
would lock an Order that posted to the Nasdaq Book before replenishment
can occur, the Displayed Order will post at the locking price if the
resting Order is Non-Display or will be repriced, ranked, and displayed
at one minimum price increment lower (higher) than the locking price if
the resting order to sell (buy) is Displayed.6 7
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \6\ The Exchange notes that a Reserve Order that does not
execute fully upon initial order entry will behavior in the same
manner as described in this Proposal if the Displayed portion of the
Reserve Order would lock or cross a resting Displayed Order upon
entry.
    \7\ If a Displayed Order posts to the Nasdaq Book and locks a
resting Non-Displayed Order with the Trade Now attribute enabled,
then consistent with the definition of Trade Now, as set forth in
Equity 4, Section 4703(m), the Trade Now functionality would apply
and the Non-Displayed Order would be able to execute against the
locking Displayed Order as a liquidity taker. If a locked Non-
Displayed Order does not have the Trade Now attribute enabled, then
new incoming orders will be eligible to execute against the
Displayed Order.

---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    Again, in the above example, the proposed rule will prevent Order 1
from becoming a liquidity remover because upon replenishment, the new
Displayed Order will not attempt to execute against Order 3, but
instead it will post to the Nasdaq Book and display at a price of
$9.99, while the remaining 2,900 non-display shares in reserve will
remain posted at $10.00.
    By posting new Displayed Orders without attempting to execute, the
Displayed Order will avoid removing liquidity upon replenishment.\8\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \8\ The Exchange proposes to correct a non-substantive
typographical error in the existing rule text by removing the word
``the'' from the following sentence: ``For example, if a Price to
Comply Order with Reserve Size . . . and the 150 shares. . . .''
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

2. Statutory Basis
    The Exchange believes that its proposal is consistent with Section
6(b) of the Act,\9\ in general, and furthers the objectives of Section
6(b)(5) of the Act,\10\ in particular, in that it is designed to
promote just and equitable principles of trade, to remove impediments
to and perfect the mechanism of a free and open market and a national
market system, and, in general to protect investors and the public
interest.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \9\ 15 U.S.C. 78f(b).
    \10\ 15 U.S.C. 78f(b)(5).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    The proposed rule change is consistent with the Act because it will
help ensure that the Exchange's Rule governing Reserve Orders will be
consistent with the original intention of the Exchange and the
expectation of participants that such Orders, after posting on the
Nasdaq Book, will always be liquidity providers and not liquidity
takers. It would also ensure that the Exchange's Order Types operate
the same way during a race condition as they do during normal
conditions. The proposal would eliminate any ambiguity under the
existing rules as to whether a Reserve Order would take liquidity when
a locking order posts to the Exchange book prior to the Reserve Order
completing its replenishment (or prior to the Displayed portion of a
Reserve Order posting to the Exchange Book for the first time). Thus,
the proposal would ensure that the Exchange's Rules are transparent and
clear about how the System processes Reserve Orders.
    Finally, the proposal is consistent with the Act because it would
correct a non-substantive typographical error in the Rule text, which
will improve its readability and clarity, to the benefit of the public
and investors.

B. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement on Burden on Competition

    The Exchange does not believe that the proposed rule change will
impose any burden on competition not necessary or appropriate in
furtherance of the purposes of the Act. Again, Exchange intends for the
proposed rule change to only eliminate an inconsistency as to how it
handles a rare circumstance that causes the System to process Reserve
Orders in an unintended manner. The Exchange does not anticipate this
proposal will have any impact on competition whatsoever.

C. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement on Comments on the Proposed
Rule Change Received From Members, Participants, or Others

    No written comments were either solicited or received.

III. Date of Effectiveness of the Proposed Rule Change and Timing for
Commission Action

    Within 45 days of the date of publication of this notice in the
Federal Register or within such longer period up to 90 days (i) as the
Commission may designate if it finds such longer period to be
appropriate and publishes its reasons for so finding or (ii) as to
which the self-regulatory organization consents, the Commission will:
    (A) By order approve or disapprove the proposed rule change, or
    (B) institute proceedings to determine whether the proposed rule
change should be disapproved.

IV. Solicitation of Comments

    Interested persons are invited to submit written data, views, and
arguments concerning the foregoing, including whether the proposed rule
change is consistent with the Act. Comments may be submitted by any of
the following methods:

Electronic Comments

     Use the Commission's internet comment form (http://www.sec.gov/rules/sro.shtml); or
     Send an email to<EMAIL_ADDRESS>Please include
File Number SR-NASDAQ-2020-090 on the subject line.

Paper Comments

     Send paper comments in triplicate to Secretary, Securities
and Exchange Commission, 100 F Street NE, Washington, DC 20549-1090.

All submissions should refer to File Number SR-NASDAQ-2020-090. This
file number should be included on the subject line if email is used. To
help the Commission process and review your comments more efficiently,
please use only one method. The Commission will post all comments on
the Commission's internet website (http://www.sec.gov/rules/sro.shtml).
Copies of the submission, all subsequent amendments, all written
statements with respect to the proposed rule change that are filed with
the Commission, and all written communications relating to the proposed
rule change between the Commission and any person, other than those
that may be withheld from the public in accordance with the provisions
of 5 U.S.C. 552, will be available for website viewing and printing in
the Commission's Public Reference Room, 100 F Street NE, Washington, DC
20549 on official business days between the hours of 10:00 a.m. and
3:00 p.m. Copies of the filing also will be available for inspection
and copying at the principal office of the Exchange. All comments
received will be posted without change. Persons submitting comments are
cautioned that we do not redact or edit personal identifying
information from comment submissions. You should submit only
information that you wish to make available publicly. All submissions
should refer to File Number SR-NASDAQ-2020-090 and should be submitted
on or before January 29, 2021.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \11\ 17 CFR 200.30-3(a)(12).

    For the Commission, by the Division of Trading and Markets,
pursuant to delegated authority.\11\
Eduardo A. Aleman,
Deputy Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2020-28891 Filed 12-29-20; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 8011-01-P