[Federal Register Volume 85, Number 34 (Thursday, February 20, 2020)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Pages 9673-9675]
[FR Doc No: 2020-02507]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY

40 CFR Part 62

[EPA-R03-OAR-2019-0160; FRL-9999-79-Region 3]

Approval and Promulgation of State Plans for Designated
Facilities and Pollutants; Delaware; Control of Emissions From Existing
Municipal Solid Waste Landfills

AGENCY: Environmental Protection Agency (EPA).

ACTION: Final rule.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) is approving a Clean
Air Act (CAA) section 111(d) plan submitted by the Delaware Department
of Natural Resources and Environmental Control (DNREC). This plan was
submitted to fulfill the requirements of the CAA and in response to
EPA's promulgation of Emissions Guidelines and Compliance Times for
municipal solid waste (MSW) landfills. The Delaware plan establishes
emission limits for existing MSW landfills, and provides for the
implementation and enforcement of those limits.

DATES: This final rule is effective on March 23, 2020. The
incorporation by reference of certain material listed in the rule is
approved by the Director of the Federal Register as of March 23, 2020.

ADDRESSES: EPA has established a docket for this action under Docket ID
Number EPA-R03-OAR-2019-0160. All documents in the docket are listed on
the https://www.regulations.gov website. Although listed in the index,
some information is not publicly available, e.g., confidential business
information (CBI) or other information whose disclosure is restricted
by statute. Certain other material, such as copyrighted material, is
not placed on the internet and will be publicly available only in hard
copy form. Publicly available docket materials are available through
https://www.regulations.gov, or please contact the person identified in
the FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT section for additional availability
information.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Mike Gordon, Permits Branch (3AD10),
Air & Radiation Division, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Region
III, 1650 Arch Street, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania 19103. The telephone
number is<PHONE_NUMBER>. Mr. Gordon can also be reached via electronic
mail at<EMAIL_ADDRESS>
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

I. Background

    On July 1, 2019 (84 FR 31279), EPA published a notice of proposed
rulemaking (NPRM) for the State of Delaware. In the NPRM, EPA proposed
approval of a Clean Air Act (CAA) section 111(d) plan submitted by the
Delaware Department of Natural Resources and Environmental Control
(DNREC). The formal State Plan was submitted by Delaware on October 10,
2017.

II. Summary of State Plan and EPA Analysis

    EPA has reviewed the Delaware section 111(d) plan submittal in the
context of the requirements of 40 CFR part 60, subparts B and Cf, and
part 62, subpart A. In this action, EPA is determining that the
submitted section 111(d) plan meets the above-cited requirements.
Included within the section 111(d) plan are regulations under the
Delaware Administrative Code, specifically DE Admin. Code 1120 (Section
30), entitled ``Standards of Performance for Municipal Solid Waste
Landfills After July 11, 2017.'' Section 30 of DE Admin. Code 1120,
which is included in the Plan, applies to each municipal solid waste
landfill, open or closed, that commenced construction, reconstruction,
or modification after July 17, 2014 or that has accepted waste after
November 8, 1987 or that has additional capacity available to accept
waste. While Delaware has chosen to regulate new and existing landfills
under the same State regulation, for purposes of this action, the Plan
applies to any Delaware ``designated facility,'' which in the context
of the Emissions Guideline means each existing MSW landfill for which
construction, reconstruction, or modification was commenced on or
before July 17, 2014,

which is consistent with the requirements of 40 CFR part 60, subpart
Cf. A detailed explanation of the rationale behind this approval is
available in the Technical Support Document (TSD).
    Other specific requirements of Delaware's State Plan for MSW
landfills and the rationale for EPA's proposed action are explained in
the NPRM and will not be restated here. No public comments were
received on the NPRM.

III. Final Action

    EPA is approving the Delaware section 111(d) plan for MSW landfills
submitted pursuant to 40 CFR part 60, subpart Cf. Therefore, EPA is
amending 40 CFR part 62, subpart I, to reflect this action. The scope
of the approval of the section 111(d) plan is limited to the provisions
of 40 CFR parts 60 and 62 for existing MSW landfills, as referenced in
the emission guidelines, subpart Cf. The EPA Administrator continues to
retain authority for approval of alternative methods to determine the
nonmethane organic compound concentration or a site-specific methane
generation rate constant (k), as stipulated in 40 CFR 60.30f(c), as
well as 7 DE Admin. Code 1120 Section 30.1.

IV. Incorporation by Reference

    In accordance with the requirements of 1 CFR 51.5, EPA is
finalizing regulatory text that includes the incorporation by reference
of Delaware Administrative Code 1120 (Section 30), effective July 11,
2017, entitled ``Standards of Performance for Municipal Solid Waste
Landfills After July 11, 2017,'' which is part of the CAA section
111(d) plan applicable to existing MSW landfills in Delaware as
discussed in section II of this preamble. The regulatory provisions of
DE Admin. Code 1120 (Section 30). The regulatory provisions of DE
Admin. Code 1120 (Section 30) incorporate by reference the Standards of
Performance for Municipal Solid Waste landfills promulgated by EPA at
40 CFR part 60, subpart XXX, and establish emission standards and
compliance times for the control of methane and other organic compounds
from MSW landfills, open or closed, located in Delaware, that commenced
construction, modification, or reconstruction after July 17, 2014 or
that have accepted waste after November 8, 1987 or that have additional
capacity available to accept waste. EPA has made, and will continue to
make, the Delaware plan, including DE Admin. Code 1120 (Section 30),
generally available through www.regulations.gov, Docket No. EPA-R03-
OAR-2019-0160, and at the EPA Region III Office (please contact the
person identified in the FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT section of
this preamble for more information). This incorporation by reference
has been approved by the Office of the Federal Register and the Plans
are federally enforceable under the CAA as of the effective date of
this final rulemaking.

V. Statutory and Executive Order Reviews

A. General Requirements

    Under the Clean Air Act, the Administrator is required to approve
section 111(d) state plan submissions that comply with the provisions
of the Act and applicable Federal regulations. 42 U.S.C. 7411(d); 40
CFR part 60, subparts B and Cf; and 40 CFR part 62, subpart A. Thus, in
reviewing CAA section 111(d) state plan submissions, the EPA's role is
to approve state choices, provided that they meet the criteria of the
Act and implementing regulations. Accordingly, this action merely
approves state law as meeting Federal requirements and does not impose
additional requirements beyond those imposed by state law. For that
reason, this action:
     Is not a ``significant regulatory action'' subject to
review by the Office of Management and Budget under Executive Orders
12866 (58 FR 51735, October 4, 1993) and 13563 (76 FR 3821, January 21,
2011);
     Is not an Executive Order 13771 (82 FR 9339, February 2,
2017) regulatory action because this action is not significant under
Executive Order 12866.
     Does not impose an information collection burden under the
provisions of the Paperwork Reduction Act (44 U.S.C. 3501 et seq.);
     Is certified as not having a significant economic impact
on a substantial number of small entities under the Regulatory
Flexibility Act (5 U.S.C. 601 et seq.);
     Does not contain any unfunded mandate or significantly or
uniquely affect small governments, as described in the Unfunded
Mandates Reform Act of 1995 (Pub. L. 104-4);
     Does not have federalism implications as specified in
Executive Order 13132 (64 FR 43255, August 10, 1999);
     Is not an economically significant regulatory action based
on health or safety risks subject to Executive Order 13045 (62 FR
19885, April 23, 1997);
     Is not a significant regulatory action subject to
Executive Order 13211 (66 FR 28355, May 22, 2001);
     Is not subject to requirements of Section 12(d) of the
National Technology Transfer and Advancement Act of 1995 (15 U.S.C. 272
note) because application of those requirements would be inconsistent
with the CAA; and
     Does not provide the EPA with the discretionary authority
to address, as appropriate, disproportionate human health or
environmental effects, using practicable and legally permissible
methods, under Executive Order 12898 (59 FR 7629, February 16, 1994).
    In addition, this rule does not have tribal implications as
specified by Executive Order 13175 (65 FR 67249, November 9, 2000),
because the State Plan is not approved to apply in Indian country
located in the state, and EPA notes that it will not impose substantial
direct costs on tribal governments or preempt tribal law.

B. Submission to Congress and the Comptroller General

    The Congressional Review Act, 5 U.S.C. 801 et seq., as added by the
Small Business Regulatory Enforcement Fairness Act of 1996, generally
provides that before a rule may take effect, the agency promulgating
the rule must submit a rule report, which includes a copy of the rule,
to each House of the Congress and to the Comptroller General of the
United States. EPA will submit a report containing this action and
other required information to the U.S. Senate, the U.S. House of
Representatives, and the Comptroller General of the United States prior
to publication of the rule in the Federal Register. A major rule cannot
take effect until 60 days after it is published in the Federal
Register. This action is not a ``major rule'' as defined by 5 U.S.C.
804(2).

C. Petitions for Judicial Review

    Under section 307(b)(1) of the CAA, petitions for judicial review
of this action must be filed in the United States Court of Appeals for
the appropriate circuit by April 20, 2020. Filing a petition for
reconsideration by the Administrator of this final rule does not affect
the finality of this action for the purposes of judicial review nor
does it extend the time within which a petition for judicial review may
be filed, and shall not postpone the effectiveness of such rule or
action. This action approving Delaware's State Plan for existing MSW
landfills may not be challenged later in proceedings to enforce its
requirements. (See section 307(b)(2).)

List of Subjects in 40 CFR Part 62

    Environmental protection, Air pollution control, Incorporation by
reference, Intergovernmental relations, Landfills, Methane, Ozone,
Reporting

and recordkeeping requirements, Sulfur oxides, Volatile organic
compounds.

    Dated: August 27, 2019.
Cosmo Servidio,
Regional Administrator, Region III.

    Editorial note:  This document was received for publication by
the Office of the Federal Register on February 4, 2020.

    For the reasons stated in the preamble, the Environmental
Protection Agency amends 40 CFR part 62 as follows:

PART 62--APPROVAL AND PROMULGATION OF STATE PLANS FOR DESIGNATED
FACILITIES AND POLLUTANTS

0
1. The authority citation for part 62 continues to read as follows:

    Authority:  42 U.S.C. 7401 et seq.

Subpart I--Delaware

0
2. Section 62.1950 is revised to read as follows:

Sec.  62.1950   Identification of plan.

    (a) Section 111(d) plan for municipal solid waste landfills and the
associated Delaware Department of Natural Resources, Division of Air
and Waste Management, Regulation No. 20, Section 28, as submitted on
April 23, 1998, to implement 40 CFR part 60, subpart Cc.
    (b) Control of Emissions from Existing Municipal Solid Waste
Landfills, including Delaware Administrative Code 1120 (Section 30),
submitted by the Delaware Department of Natural Resources and
Environmental Control on October 10, 2017, to implement 40 CFR part 60,
subpart Cf. The Plan includes the regulatory provisions cited in
paragraph (d) of this section, which the EPA incorporates by reference.
    (c) After March 23, 2020, the substantive requirements of the
municipal solid waste landfills state plan are contained in paragraph
(b) of this section and owners and operators of municipal solid waste
landfills in Delaware must comply with the requirements in paragraph
(b) of this section.
    (d)(1) The material incorporated by reference in this section was
approved by the Director of the Federal Register in accordance with 5
U.S.C. 552(a) and 1 CFR part 51. A copy of the material is available at
the EPA Region III office, 1650 Arch Street, Philadelphia, PA 19103,
215-814-5000. You may inspect a copy at the National Archives and
Records Administration (NARA). For information on the availability of
this material at NARA, email<EMAIL_ADDRESS>or go to:
www.archives.gov/federal-register/cfr/ibr-locations.html.
    (2) State of Delaware, Delaware Department of Natural Resources and
Environmental Control, State of Delaware Administrative Code.
    (i) Title 7 Natural Resources and Environmental Control, 1120 New
Source Performance Standards, 30.0 Standards of Performance for
Municipal Solid Waste Landfills After July 11, 2017, dated July 11,
2017.
    (ii) [Reserved]

0
3. Section 62.1951 is revised to read as follows:

Sec.  62.1951   Identification of sources.

    (a) The plan in Sec.  62.1950(a) applies to all Delaware existing
municipal solid waste landfills for which construction, reconstruction,
or modification was commenced before May 30, 1991 and that accepted
waste at any time since November 8, 1987, or that have additional
capacity available for future waste deposition, as described in 40 CFR
part 60, subpart Cc.
    (b) The plan in Sec.  62.1950(b) applies to all existing municipal
solid waste landfills under the jurisdiction of the Delaware Department
of Natural Resources and Environmental Control for which construction,
reconstruction, or modification was commenced on or before July 17,
2014.

0
4. Section 62.1952 is revised to read as follows:

Sec.  62.1952   Effective date.

    (a) The effective date of the plan submitted on April 23, 1998 by
the Delaware Department of Natural Resources and Environmental Control
for municipal solid waste landfills is November 16, 1999.
    (b) The effective date of the plan submitted on October 10, 2017 by
the Delaware Department of Natural Resources and Environmental Control
for municipal solid waste landfills is March 23, 2020.

[FR Doc. 2020-02507 Filed 2-19-20; 8:45 am]
 BILLING CODE 6560-50-P


[Federal Register Volume 78, Number 61 (Friday, March 29, 2013)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Pages 19088-19090]
[FR Doc No: 2013-06590]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION

Federal Aviation Administration

14 CFR Part 39

[Docket No. FAA-2012-1346; Directorate Identifier 2012-CE-047-AD;
Amendment 39-17401; AD 2013-06-04]
RIN 2120-AA64

Airworthiness Directives; REIMS AVIATION S.A. Airplanes

AGENCY: Federal Aviation Administration (FAA), Department of
Transportation (DOT).

ACTION: Final rule.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: We are adopting a new airworthiness directive (AD) for REIMS
AVIATION S.A. Model F406 airplanes. This AD results from mandatory
continuing airworthiness information (MCAI) issued by an aviation
authority of another country to identify and correct an unsafe
condition on an aviation product. The MCAI describes the unsafe
condition as fretting (wear and/or chafing) found between the elevator
pushrod assembly and the horizontal tail structure, which could cause
the elevator pushrod to jam and could result in loss of control. We are
issuing this AD to require actions to address the unsafe condition on
these products.

DATES: This AD is effective May 3, 2013.
    The Director of the Federal Register approved the incorporation by
reference of a certain publication listed in the AD as of May 3, 2013.

ADDRESSES: You may examine the AD docket on the Internet at http://www.regulations.gov or in person at Document Management Facility, U.S.
Department of Transportation, Docket Operations, M-30, West Building
Ground Floor, Room W12-140, 1200 New Jersey Avenue SE., Washington, DC
20590.
    For service information identified in this AD, contact REIMS
AVIATION INDUSTRIES, A[eacute]rodrome de Reims Prunay, 51360 Prunay,
France; telephone: <IP_ADDRESS>.65; fax: <IP_ADDRESS>.57; Internet:
http://www.geciaviation.com/en/. You may review copies of the
referenced service information at the FAA, Small Airplane Directorate,
901 Locust, Kansas City, Missouri 64106. For information on the
availability of this material at the FAA, call<PHONE_NUMBER>.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Albert Mercado, Aerospace Engineer,
FAA, Small Airplane Directorate, 901 Locust, Room 301, Kansas City,
Missouri 64106; telephone:<PHONE_NUMBER>; fax:<PHONE_NUMBER>; email:
<EMAIL_ADDRESS>
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

Discussion

    We issued a notice of proposed rulemaking (NPRM) to amend 14 CFR
part 39 to include an AD that would apply to the specified products.
That NPRM was published in the Federal Register on January 3, 2013 (78
FR 275). That NPRM proposed to correct an unsafe condition for the
specified products. The MCAI states:

    During maintenance, fretting has been found between the elevator
pushrod assembly and horizontal tail structure on Reims F406
aeroplanes. In addition, bending was found on a pushrod assembly
Part Number (P/N) 6015034-1. The investigation has not yet
established the exact cause(s) of these occurrences.
    This condition, if not detected and corrected, could lead to
failure of a pushrod and consequent jamming of the elevator
controls, possibly resulting in loss of control of the aeroplane.
    For the reasons described above, this AD requires inspection of
the pushrods and horizontal tail structure to detect fretting,
bending or eccentricity and, depending on findings, replacement with
a serviceable pushrod, or repair. This AD also requires the return
on replaced pushrods to RAI for investigation.
    This AD is considered to be an interim action and further AD
action may follow.

    You may obtain further information by examining the MCAI in the AD
docket.

Comments

    We gave the public the opportunity to participate in developing
this AD. We received no comments on the NPRM (78 FR 275, January 3,
2013) or on the determination of the cost to the public.

Conclusion

    We reviewed the relevant data and determined that air safety and
the public interest require adopting the AD as proposed except for
minor editorial changes. We have determined that these minor changes:
     Are consistent with the intent that was proposed in the
NPRM (78 FR 275, January 3, 2013) for correcting the unsafe condition;
and
     Do not add any additional burden upon the public than was
already proposed in the NPRM (78 FR 275, January 3, 2013).

Costs of Compliance

    We estimate that this AD will affect 7 products of U.S. registry.
We also estimate that it will take about 4 work-hours per product to
comply with the basic requirements of this AD. The average labor rate
is $85 per work-hour.

    Based on these figures, we estimate the cost of this AD on U.S.
operators to be $2,380, or $340 per product.
    In addition, we estimate that any necessary follow-on actions will
take about 2.5 work-hours and require parts costing $1,900, for a cost
of $2,112.50 per product. We have no way of determining the number of
products that may need these actions.

Authority for This Rulemaking

    Title 49 of the United States Code specifies the FAA's authority to
issue rules on aviation safety. Subtitle I, section 106, describes the
authority of the FAA Administrator. ``Subtitle VII: Aviation
Programs,'' describes in more detail the scope of the Agency's
authority.
    We are issuing this rulemaking under the authority described in
``Subtitle VII, Part A, Subpart III, section 44701: General
requirements.'' Under that section, Congress charges the FAA with
promoting safe flight of civil aircraft in air commerce by prescribing
regulations for practices, methods, and procedures the Administrator
finds necessary for safety in air commerce. This regulation is within
the scope of that authority because it addresses an unsafe condition
that is likely to exist or develop on products identified in this
rulemaking action.

Regulatory Findings

    We determined that this AD will not have federalism implications
under Executive Order 13132. This AD will not have a substantial direct
effect on the States, on the relationship between the national
government and the States, or on the distribution of power and
responsibilities among the various levels of government.
    For the reasons discussed above, I certify this AD:
    (1) Is not a ``significant regulatory action'' under Executive
Order 12866,
    (2) Is not a ``significant rule'' under the DOT Regulatory Policies
and Procedures (44 FR 11034, February 26, 1979),
    (3) Will not affect intrastate aviation in Alaska, and
    (4) Will not have a significant economic impact, positive or
negative, on a substantial number of small entities under the criteria
of the Regulatory Flexibility Act.

Examining the AD Docket

    You may examine the AD docket on the Internet at http://www.regulations.gov; or in person at the Docket Management Facility
between 9 a.m. and 5 p.m., Monday through Friday, except Federal
holidays. The AD docket contains the NPRM (78 FR 275, January 3, 2013),
the regulatory evaluation, any comments received, and other
information. The street address for the Docket Office (telephone (800)
647-5527) is in the ADDRESSES section. Comments will be available in
the AD docket shortly after receipt.

List of Subjects in 14 CFR Part 39

    Air transportation, Aircraft, Aviation safety, Incorporation by
reference, Safety.

Adoption of the Amendment

    Accordingly, under the authority delegated to me by the
Administrator, the FAA amends 14 CFR part 39 as follows:

PART 39--AIRWORTHINESS DIRECTIVES

0
1. The authority citation for part 39 continues to read as follows:

     Authority:  49 U.S.C. 106(g), 40113, 44701.

Sec.  39.13  [Amended]

0
2. The FAA amends Sec.  39.13 by adding the following new AD:

2013-06-04 REIMS AVIATION S.A.: Amendment 39-17401; Docket No. FAA-
2012-1346; Directorate Identifier 2012-CE-047-AD.

(a) Effective Date

    This airworthiness directive (AD) becomes effective May 3, 2013.

(b) Affected ADs

    None.

(c) Applicability

    This AD applies to REIMS AVIATION S.A. Model F406 airplanes,
serial numbers F406-0001 through F406-0096, certificated in any
category.

(d) Subject

    Air Transport Association of America (ATA) Code 27: Flight
Controls.

(e) Reason

    This AD was prompted by reports of fretting (wear and/or
chafing) found between the elevator pushrod assembly and the
horizontal tail structure. We are issuing this AD to detect and
correct any discrepancies with the elevator pushrod assembly and the
horizontal tail structure, which could cause the elevator pushrod to
fail. Failure of the elevator pushrod could cause the flight control
to jam, which could result in loss of control.

(f) Actions and Compliance

    Unless already done, do the following actions:
    (1) Within the next 4 months after May 3, 2013 (the effective
date of this AD), inspect the elevator pushrod assemblies, part
number (P/N) 6015034-1, and the horizontal tail structure following
the Accomplishment Instructions in REIMS AVIATION INDUSTRIES Service
Bulletin No. F406-70, dated July 16, 2012.
    (2) Before further flight after the inspection required in
paragraph (f)(1) of this AD, if fretting is found on the horizontal
tail structure, or the clearance between the elevator pushrod
assemblies and the horizontal tail structure is found to be
insufficient, or looseness at riveted end fittings is found on the
elevator pushrods, contact REIMS AVIATION INDUSTRIES at the address
specified in paragraph (i)(3) of this AD for a repair scheme and
incorporate the repair scheme.
    (3) Before further flight after the inspection required in
paragraph (f)(1) of this AD, if bending or eccentricity of an
elevator pushrod is found that exceeds the allowable limits, replace
each affected elevator pushrod with a serviceable part following
REIMS AVIATION INDUSTRIES Service Bulletin No. F406-70, dated July
16, 2012.

(g) Other FAA AD Provisions

    The following provisions also apply to this AD:
    (1) Alternative Methods of Compliance (AMOCs): The Manager,
Standards Office, FAA, has the authority to approve AMOCs for this
AD, if requested using the procedures found in 14 CFR 39.19. Send
information to ATTN: Albert Mercado, Aerospace Engineer, FAA, Small
Airplane Directorate, 901 Locust, Room 301, Kansas City, Missouri
64106; telephone:<PHONE_NUMBER>; fax:<PHONE_NUMBER>; email:
<EMAIL_ADDRESS>Before using any approved AMOC on any
airplane to which the AMOC applies, notify your appropriate
principal inspector (PI) in the FAA Flight Standards District Office
(FSDO), or lacking a PI, your local FSDO.
    (2) Airworthy Product: For any requirement in this AD to obtain
corrective actions from a manufacturer or other source, use these
actions if they are FAA-approved. Corrective actions are considered
FAA-approved if they are approved by the State of Design Authority
(or their delegated agent). You are required to assure the product
is airworthy before it is returned to service.
    (3) Reporting Requirements: For any reporting requirement in
this AD, a federal agency may not conduct or sponsor, and a person
is not required to respond to, nor shall a person be subject to a
penalty for failure to comply with a collection of information
subject to the requirements of the Paperwork Reduction Act unless
that collection of information displays a current valid OMB Control
Number. The OMB Control Number for this information collection is
2120-0056. Public reporting for this collection of information is
estimated to be approximately 5 minutes per response, including the
time for reviewing instructions, completing and reviewing the
collection of information. All responses to this collection of
information are mandatory. Comments concerning the accuracy of this
burden and suggestions for reducing the burden should be directed to
the FAA at: 800 Independence Ave. SW., Washington, DC 20591, Attn:
Information Collection Clearance Officer, AES-200.

(h) Related Information

    Refer to MCAI European Aviation Safety Agency (EASA) AD No.
2012-0164, dated August 28, 2012, for related information.

(i) Material Incorporated by Reference

    (1) The Director of the Federal Register approved the
incorporation by reference (IBR) of the service information listed
in this paragraph under 5 U.S.C. 552(a) and 1 CFR part 51.
    (2) You must use this service information as applicable to do
the actions required by this AD, unless the AD specifies otherwise.
    (i) REIMS AVIATION INDUSTRIES Service Bulletin No. F406-70,
dated July 16, 2012.
    (ii) Reserved.
    (3) For REIMS AVIATION INDUSTRIES service information identified
in this AD, contact REIMS AVIATION INDUSTRIES, A[eacute]rodrome de
Reims Prunay, 51360 Prunay, France; telephone: <IP_ADDRESS>.65; fax:
<IP_ADDRESS>.57; Internet: http://www.geciaviation.com/en/.
    (4) You may view this service information at FAA, Small Airplane
Directorate, 901 Locust, Kansas City, Missouri 64106. For
information on the availability of this material at the FAA, call
(816) 329-4148.
    (5) You may view this service information that is incorporated
by reference at the National Archives and Records Administration
(NARA). For information on the availability of this material at
NARA, call<PHONE_NUMBER>, or go to: http://www.archives.gov/federal-register/cfr/ibr-locations.html.

    Issued in Kansas City, Missouri, on March 18, 2013.
Earl Lawrence,
Manager, Small Airplane Directorate, Aircraft Certification Service.
[FR Doc. 2013-06590 Filed 3-28-13; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910-13-P


[Federal Register Volume 81, Number 32 (Thursday, February 18, 2016)]
[Notices]
[Pages 8194-8195]
[FR Doc No: 2016-03334]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission

[Docket No. ER16-915-000 ]

Comanche Solar PV, LLC; Supplemental Notice That Initial Market-
Based Rate Filing Includes Request for Blanket Section 204
Authorization

    This is a supplemental notice in the above-referenced proceeding of
Comanche Solar PV, LLC's application for market-based rate authority,
with an accompanying rate tariff, noting that such application includes
a request for blanket authorization, under 18 CFR part 34, of future
issuances of securities and assumptions of liability.
    Any person desiring to intervene or to protest should file with the
Federal Energy Regulatory Commission, 888 First Street NE., Washington,
DC 20426, in accordance with Rules 211 and 214 of the Commission's
Rules of Practice and Procedure (18 CFR 385.211 and 385.214). Anyone
filing a motion to intervene or protest must serve a copy of that
document on the Applicant.
    Notice is hereby given that the deadline for filing protests with
regard to the applicant's request for blanket authorization, under 18
CFR part 34, of future issuances of securities and assumptions of
liability, is March 2, 2016.
    The Commission encourages electronic submission of protests and
interventions in lieu of paper, using the FERC Online links at http://www.ferc.gov. To facilitate electronic service, persons with Internet
access who will eFile a document and/or be listed as a contact for an
intervenor must create and validate an eRegistration account using the
eRegistration link. Select the eFiling

link to log on and submit the intervention or protests.
    Persons unable to file electronically should submit an original and
5 copies of the intervention or protest to the Federal Energy
Regulatory Commission, 888 First Street NE., Washington, DC 20426.
    The filings in the above-referenced proceeding are accessible in
the Commission's eLibrary system by clicking on the appropriate link in
the above list. They are also available for electronic review in the
Commission's Public Reference Room in Washington, DC. There is an
eSubscription link on the Web site that enables subscribers to receive
email notification when a document is added to a subscribed docket(s).
For assistance with any FERC Online service, please email
<EMAIL_ADDRESS>or call<PHONE_NUMBER> (toll free). For
TTY, call<PHONE_NUMBER>.

    Dated: February 11, 2016.
Nathaniel J. Davis, Sr.,
Deputy Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2016-03334 Filed 2-17-16; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6717-01-P


Instructions for Completing OMB Form 83 I Please answer all questions and have a Senior Official or a designee sign the form. These instructions should be used in conjunction with 5 CFR 1320, which provides information on coverage, definitions, and other matters of procedure and interpretation under the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995.

Once completed, submit one copy of your OMB 83 I form, with an original signature, to the OEI Collection Strategies Division ( CSD) as part of your ICR package.

The comment fields (" clouds," appear in the left margin) provide context sensitive help. To open a comment field simply click your mouse once on the cloud to open the cloud, click again to close the comment. For longer comments, double clicking on a comment field enables a reader to see the entire comment using the vertical scroll bar ( use file/ close to return to the document.)

The margins and lines are NOT block protected, so you must fill in the form with caution, paying attention to any shifting of the existing text. The following tips should make this a simple task:

 Fill in the spaces by using the type over command. Otherwise you should delete a space for each letter you add.

 To place an " X" in a box (

) go to the " Insert/ Symbol" pull down menu, select " Iconic Symbols" in the dialogue box, and look for the "

" . Double click on the character to place it on your form.

 Use the same font.

 Do not change table lines ( although you can delete an extra space line to provide more space elsewhere).

 We do not recommend that you convert this form to WP5.1, some of these features are not available in WP5.1, so the text will scramble.

OPPTS staff originally created this OMB form in WP6.0 format. The help fields were added and it was converted to WP6.1 by OEI.

If you have any problems or questions, please call your ICR Desk Officer. They are: Rick Westlund ( Team Leader), 260 2745 OPPTS Monica Lewis, 260 4522 OSWER Phil Silverstein, 260 2728 Air ICR renewals Delores Evans, 260 1625 Air rules and rule amendments Lynn Johnson, 260 2964 Water, OP, ORD, OARM, OECA ( not airrelated OA, Regions ( not media specific) PAPERWORK REDUCTION ACT SUBMISSION Please read the instructions before completing this form. For additional forms or assistance in completing this form, contact your agency's Paperwork Clearance Officer. Send two copies of this form, the collection instrument to be reviewed, the Supporting Statement and any additional documentation to: Office of Information and Regulatory Affairs, Office of Management and Budget, Docket Library, Room 10102, 725 17th Street NW Washington, DC 20503.

1. Agency/ Subagency originating request EPA/ Office of Policy Economics and Innovation/ Office of Environmental Policy Innovation 2. OMB control number b. G None a 2010  0026 __ __ __ __

3. Type of information collection ( check one) a.

New collection b. G Revision of a currently approved collection c.  Extension of a currently approved collection d. G Reinstatement, without change, of a previously approved collection for which approval has expired e. G Reinstatement, with change, of a previously approved collection for which approval has expired f. G Existing collection in use without an OMB control number 4. Type of review requested ( check one) a.  Regular b. G Emergency  Approval requested by: / / c. G Delegated 5. Small entities Will this information collection have a significant economic impact on a substantial number of small entities? G Yes  No For b f, note item A2 of Supporting Statement Instructions 6. Requested expiration date a.  Three years from approval date b.

Other Specify:

7. Title Regulatory Reinvention Pilot Projects Under Project XL1 8. Agency form number( s) ( If applicable) ICR # 1755.06 9. Keywords Environmental Protection, Evaluation, Innovation, Pilot Project 10. Abstract This is an information collection request renewal that will allow for the continued solicitation of proposals for innovative pilot projects and to allow EPA to continue its commitments to current projects, including three specified in recently approved ICR amendments: the NYSDEC ICR amendment ( 1755.03), the US Filter ICR amendment ( 1755.04) and the POTWs ICR amendment ( 1755.05). The renewal of this ICR is important as it will allow the Agency to identify additional regulated entities who are interested in participating in innovative pilot projects as well as allow the Agency to continue its commitment to innovation and regulatory flexibility with facilities, communities, and states in achieving environmental results. The renewal of this ICR will allow OEPI to continue to receive and work with project sponsors on proposals for innovation.

11. Affected public ( Mark primary with " P" and all others that apply with " X") a. Individuals or households d. x Farms b. P Business or other for profit e. X Federal Government c. Not for profit institutions f. x State, Local or Tribal Government 12. Obligation to respond ( Mark primary with " P" and all others that apply with " X") a.  Voluntary b. G Required to obtain or retain benefits c. G Mandatory 13. Annual reporting and recordkeeping hour burden a. Number of respondents 480 b. Total annual responses 480 1. Percentage of these responses collected electronically 20 % c. Total hours requested 60,840 d. Current OMB inventory 236,130 e. Difference ( 175,290) f. Explanation of difference 1. Program Change 0 2. Adjustment ( 175,290) 14. Annual reporting and recordkeeping cost burden ( in thousands of dollars)

a. Total annualized capital/ startup costs $ 0 b. Total annual costs ( O& M) $ 0 c. Total annualized cost requested $ 0 d. Current OMB inventory $ 0 e. Difference $ 0 ____ f. Explanation of difference 1. Program change $ 0 ____ 2. Adjustment $ 0 15. Purpose of information collection ( Mark Primary With " P" and all others that apply with " X") a. __ Application for benefits e. P Program planning or management b. Program evaluation f. x Research c. __ General purpose statistics g. __ Regulatory or compliance d. __ Audit 16. Frequency of recordkeeping or reporting ( check all that apply) a. Q Recordkeeping b. Q Third party disclosure c.  Reporting 1.  On occasion 2. Q Weekly 3. Q Monthly 4. Q Quarterly 5. Q Semi annually 6. Q Annually 7. Q Biannually 8.

Other ( describe)

17. Statistical methods Does this information collection employ statistical methods?

Q Yes  No 18. Agency contact ( person who can best answer questions regarding the content of this submission) Name: Eric Marsh Phone: 202 260 2782 OMB 83 I 10/ 95 19. Certification for Paperwork Reduction Act Submissions On behalf of this Federal agency, 1 certify that the collection of information encompassed by this request complies with' 5 CFR 1320.9.

NOTE: The text of 5 CFR 1320.9, and the related provisions of 5 CFR 1320.8( b)( 3), appear at the end of the instructions. The certification is to be made with reference to those regulatory provisions as set forth in the instructions.

The following is a summary of the topics, regarding the proposed collection of information, that the certification covers:

( a) It is necessary for the proper performance of agency functions;

( b) It avoids unnecessary duplication;

( c) It reduces burden on small entities;

( d) It uses plain, coherent, and unambiguous terminology that is understandable to respondents;

( e) Its implementation will be consistent and compatible with current reporting and recordkeeping practices;

( f) It indicates the retention periods for recordkeeping requirements;

( g) It informs respondents of the information called for under 5 CFR 1320.8( b)( 3): ( I) Why the information is being collected' ( ii) Use of information; ( iii) Burden estimate; ( iv) Nature of response ( voluntary, required for a benefit, or mandatory); ( v) Nature and extent of confidentiality; and ( vi) Need to display currently valid OMB control number;

( h) It was developed by an office that has planned and allocated resources for the efficient and effective management and use of the information to be collected ( see note in Item 19 of the instructions);

( I) It uses effective and efficient statistical survey methodology; and ( j) It makes appropriate use of information technology.

If you are unable to certify compliance with any of these provisions, identify the item below and explain the reason in Item 18 of the Supporting Statement.

Signature of Program Official Katherine Dawes, Director Evaluation Support Division Office of Environmental Policy Innovation Office of Policy, Economics, and Innovation Date Signature of Senior Official or designee Oscar Morales, Director Collection Strategies Division Office of Information Collection Office of Environmental Information Date OMB 83 I 10/ 95 Certification Requirement for Paperwork Reduction Act Submissions 5 CFR 1320.9 reads " As part of the agency submission to OMB of a proposed collection of information, the agency ( through the head of the agency, the Senior Official or their designee) shall certify ( and provide a record supporting such certification) that the proposed collection of information

"( a) is necessary for the proper performance of the functions of the agency, including that the information to be collected will have practical utility;

"( b) is not unnecessarily duplicative of information otherwise reasonably accessible to the agency;

"( c) reduces to the extent practicable and appropriate the burden on persons who shall provide information to or for the agency, including with respect to small entities, as defined in the Regulatory Flexibility Act 5 U. S. C. § 601( 6)), the use of such techniques as:

"( 1) establishing differing compliance or reporting requirements or timetables that take into account the resources available to those who are to respond; "( 2) the clarification, consolidation, or simplification of compliance and reporting requirements; or collection of information , or any part thereof; "( 3) an exemption from coverage of the collection of information, or any part thereof;

"( d) is written using plain, coherent, and unambiguous terminology and is understandable to those who are to respond;

"( e) is to be implemented in ways consistent and compatible, to the maximum extent practicable, with the existing reporting and recordkeeping practices of those who are to respond;

"( f) indicates for each recordkeeping requirement the length of time persons are required to maintain the records specified;

"( g) informs potential respondents of the information called for under § 1320.8( b)( 3); [ see below]

"( h) has been developed by an office that has planned and allocated resources for the efficient and effective management and use of the information to be collected, including the processing of the information in a manner which shall enhance, where appropriate, the utility of the information to agencies and the public;

"( I) uses effective and efficient statistical survey methodology appropriate to the purpose for which the information is to be collected; and "( j) to the maximum extent practicable, uses appropriate information technology to reduce burden and improve data quality, agency efficiency and responsiveness to the public."

NOTE: 5 CFR 1320.8( b)( 3) requires that each collection of information:

"( 3) informs and provides reasonable notice to the potential persons to whom the collection of information is addressed of: "( I) the reasons the information is planned to be and/ or has been used to further the proper performance of the functions of the agency; "( ii) the way such information is planned to be and/ or has been used to further the proper performance of the functions of the agency; "( iii) an estimate, to the extent practicable, of the average burden of the collection ( together with a request that the public direct to the agency any comments concerning the accuracy of this burden estimate and any suggestions for reducing this burden); "( iv) whether responses to the collection of information are voluntary, required to obtain or retain a benefit ( citing authority), or mandatory ( citing authority); "( v) the nature and extent of confidentiality to be provided, if any ( citing authority); and "( vi) the fact that any agency may not conduct or sponsor, and a person is not required to respond to, a collection of information unless it displays a currently valid OMB control number."

OMB 83 I ( Instructions) 10/ 95


Reader's Guide to the Pentachloronitrobenzene ( PCNB) E Docket OPP 2004 0202 EPA has created this document as a guide to items posted on the PCNB e docket. The docket index lists these items by the date on which they were submitted to the docket, while this guide lists them by subject matter. The Reader's Guide allows the reader to more easily navigate the PCNB e docket.

Docket Item 1. Federal Register Notice: Pentachloronitrobenzene; Availability of Risk Assessment; August 4, 2004 Docket Item 2. Toxicology Disciplinary Chapter for the Reregistration Eligibility Decision ( RED); December 15, 2003 Docket Item 3. Report of the Hazard Identification Assessment Review Committee; April 9, 2003 Docket Item 4. Pentachloronitrobenzene: Tier I Drinking Water EDWCs for Use in the Human Health Risk Assessment; November 12, 2003 Docket Item 5. Product and Residue Chemistry Considerations; July 21, 2004 Docket Item 6. Outcome of the HED Metabolism Assessment Review Committee Held on April 16th, 2003 to discuss residues of concern in risk assessment and tolerance expression of Pentachloronitrobenzene ( PCNB); May 27, 2003 Docket Item 7. Briefing Memorandum to Metabolism Assessment Review Committee to discuss PCNB residues of concern for inclusion in dietary risk assessment; April 8, 2003 Docket Item 8. Assessment of the Dietary Cancer Risk of Hexachlorobenzene and Pentachlorobenzene as impurities in Chlorothalonil, PCNB Picloram, and several other pesticides; February 26, 1998 Docket Item 9. Review of PCNB Poisoning Incident Data Chemical; February 4, 2003 Docket Item 10. Outcome of the HED Metabolism Assessment Review Committee Held on 10/ 04/ 01 to discuss PCNB technical materials from Uniroyal and Amvac ( 10/ 04/ 01); October 31, 2001 Docket Item 11. Probabilistic Chronic Dietary Exposure Estimates for 2 Docket Item 12. Pentachlorophenol: Report of the Hazard Identification Assessment Review Committee; December 8, 1997 Docket Item 13. Product Chemistry Chapter for the Reregistration Eligibility Decision [ RED] Document; July 31, 2003 Docket Item 14. Pentachloronitrobenzene, Revised Drinking Water Assessment; Tier II Drinking Water EDWCs for Use in the Human Health Risk Assessment; December 22, 2003 Docket Item 15. Pentachloronitrobenzene ( PCNB) Revised HED Chapter of the Reregistration Eligibility Decision Document ( RED); July 27, 2004 Docket Item 16. Revised Occupational and Residential Exposure Assessment for the Reregistration Eligibility Decision Document; July 15, 2004 Docket Item 17. Revised Environmental Fate and Ecological Risk Assessment of Pentachloronitrobenzene ( transmittal memo); July 26, 2004 Docket Item 18: Environmental Fate and Ecological Risk Assessment for the Reregistration of Pentachloronitrobenzene; July 26, 2004 Docket Item 19. Review of 30 day Error Correction Comments on the Draft Environmental Fate and Ecological Risk Assessment of Pentachloronitrobenzene; July 26, 2004 Docket Item 20. Meeting of Metabolism Assessment Review Committee to discuss PCNB technical materials from Uniroyal and Amvac ( 10/ 4/ 01); September 27, 2001 Docket Item 21. Comments from a Private Citizen; August 15, 2004 Docket Item 22. Pentachloronitrobenzene ( PCNB) Summary; August 18, 2004 Docket Item 23. PCNB Overview; August 18, 2004 Docket Item 24. Comments from the Gustafson LLC; September 30, 2004 Docket Item 25. Comments from the Golf Course Superintendents Association of America; October 4, 2004 Docket Item 26. Comments from Amvac Chemical Corporation and Crompton Corporation; October 4, 2004 3 Docket Item 27. Federal Register Notice: Pentachloronitrobenzene; Revised Risk Assessments and Risk Reduction Options; March 2, 2005 Docket Item 28. Reader's Guide to the Pentachloronitrobenzene ( PCNB) E Docket OPP 2004 0202; March 2, 2005 ( this document)

Docket Item 29. Pentachloronitrobenzene ( PCNB) 2nd Revised HED Chapter of the Reregistration Eligibility Decision Document ( RED); February 3, 2005 Docket Item 30. Response to Public Comments on EPA's HED Chapter for the PCNB Reregistration Eligibility Document; February 3, 2005 Docket Item 31. Revised Toxicology Disciplinary Chapter for the Reregistration Eligibility Decision ( RED); January 7, 2005 Docket Item 32. PCNB Issue Relative to the Purity of the Marketed Technical vs Purity of the Technical Utilized in Toxicology Testing; January 21, 2005 Docket Item 33. Revised Reregistration Eligibility Decision Document ( RED): Product and Residue Chemistry Considerations; December 14, 2004.

Docket Item 34. Probabilistic Chronic Dietary Exposure Estimates; February 8, 2005 Docket Item 35. Revised Occupational and Residential Exposure Assessment for the Reregistration Eligibility Decision Document; November 15, 2004 Docket Item 36. Revised Environmental Fate and Ecological Risk Assessment of Pentachloronitrobenzene ( transmittal memo); December 21, 2004 Docket Item 37. Review of Public Comments on the Draft Environmental Fate and Ecological Risk Assessment of Pentachloronitrobenzene; December 22, 2004 Docket Item 38. Revised Environmental Fate and Ecological Risk Assessment of Pentachloronitrobenzene; February 15, 2005 4 Docket Item 39. Alternatives to PCNB on Selected Sites; February 24, 2005 Docket Item 40. Solicitation of Public Comment on Risk Management Options for PCNB; February 28, 2005


[Federal Register: April 16, 2010 (Volume 75, Number 73)]
[Notices]
[Page 20037-20038]
[DOCID:fr16ap10-155]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION

Federal Railroad Administration

Petition for Waiver of Compliance

    In accordance with part 211 of title 49 Code of Federal Regulations
(CFR), notice is hereby given that the Federal Railroad Administration
(FRA) has received a request for a waiver of compliance from certain
requirements of its safety standards. The individual petition is
described below, including the party seeking relief, the regulatory
provisions involved, the nature of the relief being requested, and the
petitioner's arguments in favor of relief.

New York & Lake Erie Railroad

[Docket Number FRA-2004-19950]

    The New York & Lake Erie Railroad (NYLE) of Gowanda, New York, has
petitioned for a permanent waiver of compliance for two locomotives,
numbered NYLE 1013 and NYLE 308,

from the requirements of the Railroad Safety Glazing Standards, Title
49 CFR Part 223, which requires certified glazing in all windows.
    The types of glazing currently used in the two locomotives are as
follows: NYLE 1013--Laminated Safety Glass AS-1, DOT 14M-220-ASI-030,
and NYLE 308--Clear Laminated Safety Glass AS-2 101. NYLE is a short
line freight carrier which travels 29.5 miles through rural countryside
and small communities on an average of 1\1/2\ times per week. The
number of cars hauled per train is five cars or less. NYLE operates on
two line segments which are connected and extend from Cattaraugus, NY,
to Dayton, NY (10.1 miles), and from Conewango Valley, NY, to Gowanda,
NY (19.4 miles). All freight is interchanged in Gowanda, NY.
    NYLE states that there has been no problem with window breakage due
to vandalism and that they have not had to replace glass due to
breakage from flying objects. Because of low risk of exposure to their
crew in the area they serve to injury due to vandalism and the fairly
substantial cost of the glazing materials involved, NYLE is requesting
the waiver of this regulation for the two locomotives listed above.
    Interested parties are invited to participate in these proceedings
by submitting written views, data, or comments. FRA does not anticipate
scheduling a public hearing in connection with these proceedings since
the facts do not appear to warrant a hearing. If any interested party
desires an opportunity for oral comment, they should notify FRA, in
writing, before the end of the comment period and specify the basis for
their request.
    All communications concerning these proceedings should identify the
appropriate docket number (e.g., Waiver Petition Docket Number FRA-
2004-19950) and may be submitted by any of the following methods:
     Web site: http://www.regulations.gov. Follow the online
instructions for submitting comments.
     Fax:<PHONE_NUMBER>.
     Mail: Docket Operations Facility, U.S. Department of
Transportation, 1200 New Jersey Avenue, SE., W12-140, Washington, DC
20590.
     Hand Delivery: 1200 New Jersey Avenue, SE., Room W12-140,
Washington, DC 20590, between 9 a.m. and 5 p.m., Monday through Friday,
except Federal holidays.
    Communications received within 45 days of the date of this notice
will be considered by FRA before final action is taken. Comments
received after that date will be considered as far as practicable. All
written communications concerning these proceedings are available for
examination during regular business hours (9 a.m.-5 p.m.) at the above
facility. All documents in the public docket are also available for
inspection and copying on the Internet at the docket facility's Web
site at http://www.regulations.gov.
    Anyone is able to search the electronic form of any written
communications and comments received into any of our dockets by the
name of the individual submitting the document (or signing the
document, if submitted on behalf of an association, business, labor
union, etc.). You may review DOT's complete Privacy Act Statement in
the Federal Register published on April 11, 2000 (65 FR 19477) or at
http://www.dot.gov/privacy.html.

    Issued in Washington, DC, on April 13, 2010.
Grady C. Cothen, Jr.,
Deputy Associate Administrator for Safety Standards and Program
Development.
[FR Doc. 2010-8760 Filed 4-15-10; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910-06-P