[Federal Register Volume 87, Number 215 (Tuesday, November 8, 2022)]
[Notices]
[Pages 67462-67463]
[FR Doc No: 2022-24331]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission

Combined Notice of Filings #2

    Take notice that the Commission received the following electric
corporate filings:

    Docket Numbers: [ER10-1951-049; ER10-1970-026; ER10-1972-026; ER10-
1973-018; ER10-1974-029; ER10-1975-030; ER10-2641-043; ER11-2192-020;
ER11-2365-009; ER11-4462-071; ER11-4677-024; ER12-676-020; ER12-2444-
023; ER13-2461-021; ER14-21-014; ER14-2708-025; ER14-2709-024; ER14-
2710-024; ER15-30-022; ER15-58-022; ER15-1016-017; ER15-2243-015; ER16-
1440-018; ER16-1913-011; ER16-2240-018; ER16-2241-017; ER16-2297-018;
ER16-2443-014; ER16-2506-019; ER17-196-009; ER17-838-046; ER17-1774-
008; ER18-772-009; ER18-807-010; ER18-1535-009; ER18-1981-013; ER18-
2224-017; ER18-2314-009; ER19-11-008; ER19-1128-007; ER19-2266-007;
ER20-792-007; ER20-1219-005; ER20-1220-008; ER20-1417-006; ER20-1879-
009; ER20-1985-005; ER20-1988-006; ER20-1991-007; ER20-2012-005; ER20-
2153-007; ER20-2380-006; ER20-2603-007; ER20-2648-006; ER21-183-005;
ER21-1506-005; ER21-1532-004; ER21-1880-003; ER21-2048-005; ER21-2100-
005; ER21-2641-004; ER22-96-003].
    Applicants: Route 66 Solar Energy Center, LLC, Quinebaug Solar,
LLC, Point Beach Solar, LLC, Sac County Wind, LLC, Niyol Wind, LLC,
Quitman II Solar, LLC, Shaw Creek Solar, LLC, Nutmeg Solar, LLC,
Northern Divide Wind, LLC, Skeleton Creek Wind, LLC, Saint Solar, LLC,
Sanford Airport Solar, LLC, Orbit Bloom Energy, LLC, Ponderosa Wind,
LLC, Northern Colorado Wind Energy Center II, LLC, Northern Colorado
Wind Energy Center, LLC, Oliver Wind I, LLC, Roundhouse Renewable
Energy, LLC, Oliver Wind Center II, LLC, Peetz Table Wind, LLC,
Oklahoma Wind, LLC, Quitman Solar, LLC, Rush Springs Energy Storage,
LLC, Peetz Logan Interconnect, LLC, Sholes Wind, LLC, Pegasus Wind,
LLC, Pratt Wind, LLC, Montauk Energy Storage Center, LLC, Pinal Central
Energy Center, LLC, New Mexico Wind, LLC, NextEra Energy Bluff Point,
LLC, NextEra Energy Marketing, LLC, Pima Energy Storage System, LLC,
Oliver Wind III, LLC, NextEra Blythe Solar Energy Center, LLC, Osborn
Wind Energy, LLC, Ninnescah Wind Energy, LLC, Rush Springs Wind Energy,
LLC, River Bend Solar, LLC, Roswell Solar, LLC, Silver State Solar
Power South, LLC, Shafter Solar, LLC, Palo Duro Wind Interconnection
Services, LLC, Seiling Wind Interconnection Services, LLC, Palo Duro
Wind Energy, LLC, Seiling Wind II, LLC, Seiling Wind, LLC, Mountain
View Solar, LLC, Pheasant Run Wind, LLC, North Sky River Energy, LLC,
Perrin Ranch Wind, LLC, NextEra Energy Montezuma II Wind, LLC, NEPM II,
LLC, Paradise Solar Urban Renewal, L.L.C., Red Mesa Wind, LLC, Oleander
Power Project, Limited Partnership, Sayreville Power Generation LP.
    Description: Notice of Change in Status of NextEra Energy Services
Massachusetts, LLC, Part 3 of 4, et al.
    Filed Date: 10/31/22.
    Accession Number: 20221031-5405.
    Comment Date: 5 p.m. ET 11/21/22.

    Docket Numbers: ER10-2078-025; ER11-4678-023; ER12-631-024; ER12-
1660-026; ER13-2458-021; ER13-2474-023; ER16-1277-014; ER16-1293-014;
ER17-582-015; ER17-583-015; ER17-2270-018; ER18-2032-013; ER18-2091-
010; ER19-774-009; ER19-1076-008; ER19-2382-010; ER19-2495-009; ER19-
2513-009; ER20-637-007; ER20-780-007; ER20-2070-005; ER20-2237-007;
ER20-2597-007; ER20-2622-006; ER21-255-006; ER21-744-004; ER21-1580-
005; ER21-1813-007; ER21-1814-007; ER21-2109-003; ER22-1370-004; ER22-
1870-001; ER22-2601-001; ER22-2824-001.
    Applicants: Yellow Pine Solar, LLC, Walleye Wind, LLC, Vansycle II
Wind, LLC, Sunlight Storage, LLC, Wheatridge Solar Energy Center, LLC,
Yellow Pine Energy Center II, LLC, Yellow Pine Energy Center I, LLC,
Sky River Wind, LLC, Wallingford Renewable Energy LLC, Taylor Creek
Solar, LLC, Wilmot Energy Center, LLC, Soldier Creek Wind, LLC,
Weatherford Wind, LLC, Wheatridge Wind II, LLC, Sooner Wind, LLC,
Wilton Wind Energy I, LLC, Wilton Wind Energy II, LLC, Wessington
Springs Wind, LLC, Story County Wind, LLC, Windstar Energy, LLC,
Stanton Clean Energy, LLC, Titan Solar, LLC, Wildcat Ranch Wind
Project, LLC, Stuttgart Solar, LLC, Whitney Point Solar, LLC, Westside
Solar, LLC, White Oak Solar, LLC, White Pine Solar, LLC, Steele Flats
Wind Project, LLC, Tuscola Wind II, LLC, Tuscola Bay Wind, LLC,
Windpower Partners 1993, LLC, Vasco Winds, LLC, White Oak Energy LLC.
    Description: Notice of Change in Status of White Oak Energy LLC,
Part 4 of 4 et al.
    Filed Date: 10/31/22.
    Accession Number: 20221031-5398.
    Comment Date: 5 p.m. ET 11/21/22.

    Docket Numbers: ER11-4462-072; ER10-1951-050; ER13-2474-024; ER14-
2708-026; ER14-2709-025; ER14-2710-025; ER15-30-023; ER15-58-023; ER16-
1440-019; ER16-2240-019; ER16-2241-018; ER16-2297-019; ER17-838-047;
ER18-1981-014; ER18-2032-014; ER18-2314-010; ER19-1128-008; ER19-2495-
010; ER19-2513-010; ER20-637-008; ER20-780-008; ER20-792-008; ER20-
1991-008; ER20-2237-008; ER20-2597-008; ER20-2603-008; ER20-2648-007.
    Applicants: Wilton Wind Energy II, LLC, Wilton Wind Energy I, LLC,
Wildcat Ranch Wind Project, LLC, Wessington Springs Wind, LLC,
Weatherford Wind, LLC, Steele Flats Wind Project, LLC, Soldier Creek
Wind, LLC, Sooner Wind, LLC, Skeleton Creek Wind, LLC, Sholes Wind,
LLC, Seiling Wind, LLC, Seiling Wind Interconnection Services, LLC,
Seiling Wind II, LLC, Rush Springs Wind Energy, LLC, Rush Springs
Energy Storage, LLC, Roswell Solar, LLC, Pratt Wind, LLC, Ponderosa
Wind, LLC, Palo Duro Wind Interconnection Services, LLC, Palo Duro Wind
Energy, LLC, Osborn Wind Energy, LLC, Oklahoma Wind, LLC, Northern
Divide Wind, LLC, Ninnescah Wind Energy, LLC, NextEra Energy Services
Massachusetts, LLC, NextEra Energy Marketing, LLC, NEPM II, LLC.
    Description: Notice of Change in Status of Elk City Wind, LLC, Part
2 of 2, et al.
    Filed Date: 10/31/22.
    Accession Number: 20221031-5406.
    Comment Date: 5 p.m. ET 11/21/22.

    Docket Numbers: ER12-1821-004.
    Applicants: Colorado Highlands Wind, LLC.
    Description: Notice of Change in Status of Colorado Highlands Wind,
LLC.
    Filed Date: 11/1/22.
    Accession Number: 20221101-5253.
    Comment Date: 5 p.m. ET 11/22/22.

    Docket Numbers: ER13-172-002; ER20-134-001; ER18-1777-004; ER10-
1342-006.
    Applicants: CP Energy Marketing (US) Inc., Meadowlark Wind I LLC,
Cardinal Point LLC, Midland Cogeneration Venture Limited Partnership.
    Description: Notice of Change in Status, Tariff Amendments, and
Request for Waiver of Midland Cogeneration Venture Limited Partnership.
    Filed Date: 10/31/22.
    Accession Number: 20221031-5399.
    Comment Date: 5 p.m. ET 11/21/22.

    Docket Numbers: ER20-2019-007; ER11-2642-023; ER10-1849-029; ER10-
1852-072; ER12-895-028; ER12-1228-030; ER13-712-031; ER14-2707-025;
ER15-1925-023; ER15-2676-022; ER16-1672-020; ER16-2190-019; ER16-2191-
019; ER16-2275-018; ER16-2276-018; ER16-2453-020; ER17-2152-016; ER18-
882-015; ER18-1863-013; ER18-2003-014; ER18-2066-009; ER18-2118-015;
ER18-2182-015; ER20-1907-007; ER20-1986-006; ER20-2064-008; ER21-1990-
005; ER21-2117-006; ER21-2149-006; ER21-2225-006; ER21-2296-006; ER21-
2699-007; ER22-1982-002.
    Applicants: Great Prairie Wind, LLC, Minco Wind Energy III, LLC,
Ensign Wind Energy, LLC, Irish Creek Wind, LLC, Minco Wind Energy II,
LLC, Little Blue Wind Project, LLC, Blackwell Wind Energy, LLC, High
Majestic Wind I, LLC, Day County Wind I, LLC, Minco Wind I, LLC, Minco
IV & V Interconnection, LLC, Armadillo Flats Wind Project, LLC, Minco
Wind IV, LLC, Lorenzo Wind, LLC, Coolidge Solar I, LLC, Elk City
Renewables II, LLC, Cottonwood Wind Project, LLC, Brady
Interconnection, LLC, Kingman Wind Energy II, LLC, Kingman Wind Energy
I, LLC, Brady Wind II, LLC, Brady Wind, LLC, Chaves County Solar, LLC,
Cedar Bluff Wind, LLC, Breckinridge Wind Project, LLC, Mammoth Plains
Wind Project, LLC, Cimarron Wind Energy, LLC, High Majestic Wind II,
LLC, Minco Wind Interconnection Services, LLC, Florida Power & Light
Company, Elk City Wind, LLC,FPL Energy South Dakota Wind, LLC, Gray
County Wind, LLC.
    Description: Notice of Change in Status of Elk City Wind, LLC, Part
1 of 2, et al.
    Filed Date: 10/31/22.
    Accession Number: 20221031-5404.
    Comment Date: 5 p.m. ET 11/21/22.

    Docket Numbers: ER22-2953-001.
    Applicants: Public Service Company of New Hampshire, ISO New
England Inc.
    Description: Tariff Amendment: ISO New England Inc. submits tariff
filing per 35.17(b): Establishment of Depreciation Rate for Accts 357
and 358 in App D-PSNH to Att F to be effective 1/1/2023.
    Filed Date: 11/2/22.
    Accession Number: 20221102-5131.
    Comment Date: 5 p.m. ET 11/23/22.

    The filings are accessible in the Commission's eLibrary system
(https://elibrary.ferc.gov/idmws/search/fercgensearch.asp) by querying
the docket number.
    Any person desiring to intervene or protest in any of the above
proceedings must file in accordance with Rules 211 and 214 of the
Commission's Regulations (18 CFR 385.211 and 385.214) on or before 5:00
p.m. Eastern time on the specified comment date. Protests may be
considered, but intervention is necessary to become a party to the
proceeding.
    eFiling is encouraged. More detailed information relating to filing
requirements, interventions, protests, service, and qualifying
facilities filings can be found at: http://www.ferc.gov/docs-filing/efiling/filing-req.pdf. For other information, call<PHONE_NUMBER>
(toll free). For TTY, call<PHONE_NUMBER>.

    Dated: November 2, 2022.
Debbie-Anne A. Reese,
Deputy Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2022-24331 Filed 11-7-22; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6717-01-P


[Federal Register Volume 84, Number 204 (Tuesday, October 22, 2019)]
[Notices]
[Page 56448]
[FR Doc No: 2019-23000]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission

[Docket No. NJ20-1-000]

Oncor Electric Delivery Company LLC; Notice of Filing

    Take notice that on October 16, 2019, Oncor Electric Delivery
Company LLC submitted its tariff filing: Oncor TFO Tariff Rate Changes
to be effective 9/27/19.
    Any person desiring to intervene or to protest this filing must
file in accordance with Rules 211 and 214 of the Commission's Rules of
Practice and Procedure (18 CFR 385.211, 385.214). Protests will be
considered by the Commission in determining the appropriate action to
be taken, but will not serve to make protestants parties to the
proceeding. Any person wishing to become a party must file a notice of
intervention or motion to intervene, as appropriate. Such notices,
motions, or protests must be filed on or before the comment date. On or
before the comment date, it is not necessary to serve motions to
intervene or protests on persons other than the Applicant.
    The Commission encourages electronic submission of protests and
interventions in lieu of paper using the ``eFiling'' link at http://www.ferc.gov. Persons unable to file electronically should submit an
original and 5 copies of the protest or intervention to the Federal
Energy Regulatory Commission, 888 First Street NE, Washington, DC
20426.
    This filing is accessible on-line at http://www.ferc.gov, using the
``eLibrary'' link and is available for review in the Commission's
Public Reference Room in Washington, DC. There is an ``eSubscription''
link on the website that enables subscribers to receive email
notification when a document is added to a subscribed docket(s). For
assistance with any FERC Online service, please email
<EMAIL_ADDRESS>or call<PHONE_NUMBER> (toll free). For
TTY, call<PHONE_NUMBER>.
    Comment Date: 5:00 p.m. Eastern Time on November 6, 2019.

    Dated: October 16, 2019.
Kimberly D. Bose,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2019-23000 Filed 10-21-19; 8:45 am]
 BILLING CODE 6717-01-P


Testimony

of

Lori Leffler

PPG Industries

on

National Emission Standards for Hazardous Air Pollutants: Areas Source
Standards for Paints and Allied Products Manufacturing

Public Hearing

Environmental Protection Agency – Research Triangle Park

July 16, 2009

Good morning, I am Lori Leffler, and I am the Plant Manager of the PPG
Greensboro Powder Facility.

The first concern I have with this rule is that we are trying to figure
out how our powder plant is going to comply with this rule, especially
since the rule seems to be written more from a liquid coating
perspective. While we do have premix/assembly operations which may
include pigment additions, powder plants do not really have process
vessels. In addition we utilize particulate baghouses as part of the
process to collect powders, however these do not vent to the atmosphere
so we anticipate that these particulate filters are not applicable.

We are concerned about the provision in the proposed rule where if the
proposed standards are applicable to a facility then the proposed
standards apply to all organic and particulate HAP emissions – not
just the Urban HAPs of concern. This is problematic especially for a
powder plant – will covers be required on our operations even though
we don’t have organic volatile emissions. We recommend this provision
be dropped or limited to only equipment that is in Urban HAP service.

It is important to note that our Greensboro plant has been operating
under a state permit so this rule will not reduce any additional HAP
emissions but will increase recordkeeping burden.  Most paint facilities
that have particulate controls don’t have opacity limits. They
especially don’t have limits as stringent as the proposed 5% opacity
limit. NPCA reviewed the operating permits in the proposed rule docket
and out of the 44 facility permits, only three facilities had a 5%
opacity requirement. The remaining 41 facilities either had no
requirement at all or were 20% opacity or greater. Given this, I believe
that EPA’s proposal of 5% is arbitrary and not in line with the
reality on the ground. We believe that a 30% opacity is much more
reasonable (Lori what is your facility’s opacity limit?)

Also, give the burden associated with Method 9, we suggest that EPA
allow for an alternative or modification to Method 9 that has been
widely implemented across the country. This alternate method uses
observation and reporting techniques very similar to Method 9 except
that an uncertified observer would be permitted to make an initial
determination of any visible emission. If a visible emission is
identified, then corrective measures must be taken. If more than a trace
of visible emissions persists after maintenance has been completed, the
facility must either determine whether the emission limit is being
exceed using a certified observer - or shut the process shut down. We
have a similar method in place at our facility and suggest that EPA
include this in the final rulemaking (Lori please elaborate on the
method if you could, benefits, etc.).

Finally, as I mentioned earlier, we already have been complying with a
state permit for years, this rule will not result in any further
emission reductions but will require my personal to complete additional
burdensome recordkeeping, EPA should somehow limit the burden on
facilities that already have controls and state permits – we suggest
EPA allow these facilities to just continue with their current state
permit conditions without additional recordkeeping and reporting
requirements.