[Federal Register Volume 77, Number 92 (Friday, May 11, 2012)]
[Notices]
[Pages 27768-27769]
[FR Doc No: 2012-11353]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission

[Project No. 12604-002]

Greybull Valley Irrigation District; Notice of Preliminary Permit
Application Accepted for Filing and Soliciting Comments, Motions To
Intervene, and Competing Applications

    On February 1, 2012, the Greybull Valley Irrigation District filed
an application for a preliminary permit, pursuant to section 4(f) of
the Federal Power Act (FPA), proposing to study the feasibility of the
Lower Sunshine Reservoir Hydroelectric Power Project (Lower Sunshine
Project or project) to be located on Sunshine Creek, near Meeteetse,
Park County, Wyoming. The sole purpose of a preliminary permit, if
issued, is to grant the permit holder priority to file a license
application during the permit term. A preliminary permit does not
authorize the permit holder to perform any land-disturbing activities
or otherwise enter upon lands or waters owned by others without the
owners' express permission.
    The proposed project would utilize the existing Lower Sunshine dam
and reservoir having a total storage capacity of 56,378 acre-feet at
elevation 6,277 feet mean sea level, and would consist of the following
new features: (1) A 50-foot-long, 6-foot-diameter penstock extending
from the existing conduit to the powerhouse; (2) a powerhouse
containing two turbine/generator units totaling 5 megawatts or less in
capacity at 170 feet of net head; (3) a tailrace discharging flows to
Sunshine Creek; (4) a 1,700-foot-long, 25-kilovolt (kV) transmission
line extending from the project to a 69-kV transmission line owned by
the Western Area Power Administration and Rocky Mountain Power (the
point of interconnection); and (5) appurtenant facilities. The
estimated annual generation of the Lower Sunshine Project would be 12.4
gigawatt-hours.
    Applicant Contacts: Mr. Lee Allen, 989 Highway 20 West, P.O. Box
44, Emblem, Wyoming 82422; phone:<PHONE_NUMBER>. Mr. William
Schlenker, 989 Highway 20 West, P.O. Box 44, Emblem, Wyoming 82422;
phone:<PHONE_NUMBER>.
    FERC Contact: Kim Nguyen; phone:<PHONE_NUMBER>.
    Deadline for filing comments, motions to intervene, competing
applications (without notices of intent), or notices of intent to file
competing applications: 60 days from the issuance of this notice.
Competing applications and notices of

intent must meet the requirements of 18 CFR 4.36. Comments, motions to
intervene, notices of intent, and competing applications may be filed
electronically via the Internet. See 18 CFR 385.2001(a)(1)(iii) and the
instructions on the Commission's Web site http://www.ferc.gov/docs-filing/efiling.asp. Commenters can submit brief comments up to 6,000
characters, without prior registration, using the eComment system at
http://www.ferc.gov/docs-filing/ecomment.asp. You must include your
name and contact information at the end of your comments. For
assistance, please contact FERC Online Support at
<EMAIL_ADDRESS>or toll free at 1-866-208-3676, or for TTY,
(202) 502-8659. Although the Commission strongly encourages electronic
filing, documents may also be paper-filed. To paper-file, mail an
original and seven copies to: Kimberly D. Bose, Secretary, Federal
Energy Regulatory Commission, 888 First Street NE., Washington, DC
20426.
    More information about this project, including a copy of the
application, can be viewed or printed on the ``eLibrary'' link of
Commission's Web site at http://www.ferc.gov/docs-filing/elibrary.asp.
Enter the docket number (P-12604-002) in the docket number field to
access the document. For assistance, contact FERC Online Support.

    Dated: May 4, 2012.
Kimberly D. Bose,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2012-11353 Filed 5-10-12; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6717-01-P


[Federal Register Volume 86, Number 37 (Friday, February 26, 2021)]
[Proposed Rules]
[Pages 11691-11694]
[FR Doc No: 2021-03984]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY

40 CFR Part 52

[EPA-R05-OAR-2020-0126; FRL-10020-53-Region 5]

Air Plan Approval; Ohio; NSR Program Administrative Rules

AGENCY: Environmental Protection Agency (EPA).

ACTION: Proposed rule.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) is proposing to
approve, under the Clean Air Act (CAA), new and updated administrative
rules for the Ohio State Implementation Plan (SIP) for the New Source
Review (NSR) permitting program. The new and amended administrative
rules in the Ohio Administrative Code (OAC) would replace the currently
effective procedural rules in the NSR SIP in their entirety. As part of
this action, EPA is also proposing to approve the removal of obsolete
language related to Significant Deterioration of Air Quality.

DATES: Comments must be received on or before March 29, 2021.

ADDRESSES: Submit your comments, identified by Docket ID No. EPA-R05-
OAR-2020-0126 at http://www.regulations.gov, or via email to
<EMAIL_ADDRESS>For comments submitted at Regulations.gov,
follow the online instructions for

submitting comments. Once submitted, comments cannot be edited or
removed from Regulations.gov. For either manner of submission, EPA may
publish any comment received to its public docket. Do not submit
electronically any information you consider to be Confidential Business
Information (CBI) or other information whose disclosure is restricted
by statute. Multimedia submissions (audio, video, etc.) must be
accompanied by a written comment. The written comment is considered the
official comment and should include discussion of all points you wish
to make. EPA will generally not consider comments or comment contents
located outside of the primary submission (i.e., on the web, cloud, or
other file sharing system). For additional submission methods, please
contact the person identified in the FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT
section. For the full EPA public comment policy, information about CBI
or multimedia submissions, and general guidance on making effective
comments, please visit http://www2.epa.gov/dockets/commenting-epa-dockets.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Mari Gonz[aacute]lez, Environmental
Engineer, Air Permits Section, Air Programs Branch (AR-18J),
Environmental Protection Agency, Region 5, 77 West Jackson Boulevard,
Chicago, Illinois 60604,<PHONE_NUMBER><EMAIL_ADDRESS>The EPA
Region 5 office is open from 8:30 a.m. to 4:30 p.m., Monday through
Friday, excluding Federal holidays and facility closures due to COVID-
19.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Throughout this document whenever ``we,''
``us,'' or ``our'' is used, we mean EPA. This supplementary information
section is arranged as follows:

I. Background
II. What action is EPA taking?
III. Incorporation by Reference
IV. Statutory and Executive Order Reviews

I. Background

A. NSR Administrative Rules

    On January 10, 2003 (68 FR 1366), EPA approved Ohio's procedural
rules in OAC 3745-47 into the NSR SIP. These rules included processes
for public notice procedures for permits in attainment and
nonattainment areas.
    On April 2, 2012, Ohio EPA adopted the new and amended rules of OAC
3745-47 and OAC 3745-49, which updated administrative and adjudication
procedures and moved public notice procedures from OAC 3745-47 to OAC
3745-49.
    On July 27, 2019, Ohio EPA adopted amendments to OAC 3745-49 to
allow for modern electronic methods to be used for public noticing of
SIP related projects and not limiting the process to publication of
public notices in a newspaper.
    On February 28, 2020, Ohio EPA submitted new and amended rules to
EPA for approval which would replace OAC chapter 3745-47. The new and
amended rules are located in OAC chapters 3745-49-01 ``Administrative
Procedures'', 3745-49-02 ``Administrative procedures--definitions'',
3745-49-05 ``Draft actions and proposed actions'', 3745-49-06
``Issuance of final actions'', 3745-49-07 ``Public notice'', and 3745-
49-08 ``Contents of public notices''.

B. Significant Deterioration of Air Quality

    On June 19, 2020, Ohio EPA submitted a request to remove obsolete
language in 40 CFR 52.1884. As explained below, EPA is proposing to
approve the deletion of this section from the SIP because Ohio has a
SIP-approved Prevention of Significant Deterioration (PSD) program, and
EPA concurs that the provision is obsolete.

II. What action is EPA taking?

A. NSR Administrative Rules

    EPA is proposing to approve revisions to the Ohio SIP submitted on
February 28, 2020. This submittal includes revisions which replace the
entire existing SIP-approved procedural rules in OAC 3745-47 with the
administrative rules from OAC 3745-49-01, 3745-49-02, 3745-49-05, 3745-
49-06, 3745-49-07, and 3745-49-08.
    The rules in OAC 3745-49-01, which EPA is proposing to approve,
pertain to administrative procedures and are composed of reorganized
portions of previously SIP-approved rules from OAC 3745-47-01, 3745-47-
02, and 3734-03. These rules detail the applicability and construction
of administrative procedures rules. EPA finds that the revisions are
consistent with Federal provisions for administrative procedures for
SIPs found in 40 CFR 51.163.
    The rules in OAC 3745-49-02 contain administrative procedures
definitions. This chapter of the rules contains reorganized definitions
from previously approved chapter 3745-47-03, as well as new
definitions. New definitions include: (C)(1) ``claimant'' which is
added to define a person who claims information submitted to an agency
is confidential because it constitutes a trade secret; (C)(2)
``complainant'' which defines a person who has filed a verified
complaint; (P)(2) ``personal knowledge'' which is added to define
knowledge gained through first hand observation or experience; (P)(4)
``proposed public copy'' which defines a version of information
submitted to the agency which omits trade secret information; (P)(5)
``public copy'' which defines a version of information maintained by
the agency which omits trade secret information; (P)(7) ``public
record'' which is added to clarify that it has the same meaning as in
section 149.43 of Ohio's Revised Code; (T) ``trade secret'' which is
added to define information, not including discharge or emissions data,
that is reasonable to maintain its secrecy and derives independent
economic value from not being generally known; and (U) ``unredacted
copy'' which defines a complete official version of information
submitted to an agency from which trade secret information has not been
withheld. The definition for (V) ``verified complaint'' which was
previously approved into the SIP was revised and defined as a complaint
which meets the requirements of ORC 3745.08 and OAC 3745-49-12. The
remaining definitions in this section contain minor word changes and
are reformatted versions of previously approved definitions from OAC
3745-47. The definitions in OAC 3745-49-02 are not defined within the
Federal rules, and their approval into the SIP would not cause
inconsistencies with the application of Federal regulations. EPA finds
that the revised language and new definitions are consistent with
Federal requirements for administrative procedures for SIPs found in 40
CFR 51.163.
    The rules in OAC 3745-49-05, which EPA is proposing to approve,
contain language on draft actions and proposed actions. This chapter
contains language which has been reformatted and expanded from
previously approved rules in OAC 3745-47-05 and 3745-47-07. EPA finds
that the revisions are consistent with Federal requirements.
    The rules in OAC 3745-49-06 contain language on the issuance of
final actions. This chapter contains language which has been
reformatted from previously approved rules in OAC 3745-47-05 and 3745-
47-07. EPA finds that non-substantive changes have been made to the
previously approved rule language, and the revisions are consistent
with Federal requirements.
    The rules in OAC 3745-49-07 contain updates to public notice
requirements for SIP-related projects. This chapter contains
reorganized and amended rules from previously approved chapter 3745-47-
07 as well as new changes. The changes update noticing procedures

for public notices in subparts (B)(1) and (B)(2) related to Ohio's SIP
developed under section 110 of the CAA to allow for more modern
electronic methods to be used. EPA anticipates that allowing for
electronic methods of providing notice, which is already being
practiced by many permitting authorities, will allow permitting
authorities to communicate affected actions to the public more quickly
and efficiently, expand access, and will provide cost savings over
newspaper publications. States are obligated to provide notice of new
and updated SIPs and offer the opportunity to comment through hearings.
The remaining changes in this chapter include minor revisions and
reorganized rules. EPA has determined that the revised rules regarding
public noticing of SIP-related projects comply with Federal definitions
and provisions found at 40 CFR 51.102 which detail procedural
requirements for public hearings related to the preparation, adoption,
and submittal of implementation plans. EPA finds that the remaining
minor revisions in this chapter are also consistent with Federal
requirements.
    The rules in OAC 3745-49-08 contain requirements for contents of
public notices. This chapter contains reorganized rules from previously
approved chapters 3745-47-08 and 3745-47-05, amended rules, as well as
new requirements. New requirements were added in subparts (A)(3) and
(D)(3) to require that public notices of actions and public meetings,
respectively, include instructions for those desiring to obtain
additional information, a copy of any factsheet prepared, or a copy of
the action. Similarly, new requirements were also added to subparts
(A)(4) and (D)(4) to require public notices of actions and public
meetings to include instructions for those desiring to be included in
the mailing list. Language in subpart (B)(3)(c) was added to clarify
that a draft action or proposed action shall not become final if an
adjudication hearing is timely requested. New requirements for public
notices of public meetings in subpart (D)(8) include requirements for
providing a statement of issues to be addressed at a public meeting if
activities or operations that are the subject of the action are not
included in the public notice. The new language in subpart (D)(9) was
added to require a statement that the purpose of the public meeting was
to obtain additional information which the director will consider prior
to taking further action on the matter under consideration. Part (E)
was added to OAC 3745-49-08 to include requirements for public notices
of verified complaints. Language in part (F) was reorganized from
previously approved language in OAC 3745-47-08 and subpart (F)(5) was
added to clarify that all other public notices shall also include a
statement specifying that written comments regarding the subject of the
public notice may be submitted within thirty days or any longer period
as specified by the Ohio EPA. Additional new language in this chapter
includes subpart (G) which addresses cases where duplicate information
is required in multiple notices, subpart (H) which specifies the
requirements for notices of any action to modify an action of the
director, and subpart (I) which specifies that all notices required by
OAC 3745-49-07 may be in summary form. The remaining language in OAC
3745-49-08 includes reorganized rules from previously approved
chapters. EPA finds that the minor revisions and new rules in this
chapter are consistent with Federal provisions and requirements
concerning public availability of information found in 40 CFR 51.161.
    EPA has determined that the rules in OAC 3745-49 are consistent
with EPA's PSD regulations and that approval of these amendments,
revisions, and new rules is consistent with the requirements of CAA
section 110(l) and will not adversely impact air quality. For these
reasons, EPA is proposing to approve these rules into the Ohio SIP.

B. Significant Deterioration of Air Quality

    EPA is also proposing to approve the removal of 40 CFR 52.1884 from
the CFR. 40 CFR 52.1884 incorporates the provisions of the Federal PSD
program into Ohio's state plan and only applies when the requirements
of sections 160 through 165 of the CAA are not met. Since Ohio's PSD
program was approved into the SIP on January 22, 2003 (68 FR 2909),
this language is no longer applicable. The language contained in 40 CFR
52.1884 became obsolete when EPA delegated authority to Ohio EPA to
implement the Federal PSD program.
    EPA has determined that removal of this obsolete language would not
interfere with any applicable requirement concerning attainment and
reasonable further progress and that approval of this revision is
consistent with the requirements of CAA section 110(l) and will not
adversely impact air quality. Therefore, EPA is proposing to approve
deletion of the obsolete language from the Ohio SIP.

III. Incorporation by Reference

    In this action, EPA is proposing to include in a final EPA rule
regulatory text that includes incorporation by reference. In accordance
with requirements of 1 CFR 51.5, EPA is proposing to incorporate by
reference the following rules in Ohio Administrative Code Chapter 3745-
49: Rules 3745-49-01, 3745-49-02, 3745-49-06, and 3745-49-08, effective
April 2, 2012 and Rule 3745-49-07, effective July 27, 2019, discussed
in Section II of this action. EPA has made, and will continue to make,
these documents generally available through www.regulations.gov and at
the EPA Region 5 Office (please contact the person identified in the
For Further Information Contact section of this preamble for more
information).

IV. Statutory and Executive Order Reviews

    Under the CAA the Administrator is required to approve a SIP
submission that complies with the provisions of the CAA and applicable
Federal regulations. 42 U.S.C. 7410(k); 40 CFR 52.02(a). Thus, in
reviewing SIP submissions, EPA's role is to approve state choices,
provided that they meet the criteria of the CAA. Accordingly, this
action merely approves state law as meeting Federal requirements and
does not impose additional requirements beyond those imposed by state
law. For that reason, this action:
     Is not a significant regulatory action subject to review
by the Office of Management and Budget under Executive Orders 12866 (58
FR 51735, October 4, 1993) and 13563 (76 FR 3821, January 21, 2011);
     Does not impose an information collection burden under the
provisions of the Paperwork Reduction Act (44 U.S.C. 3501 et seq.);
     Is certified as not having a significant economic impact
on a substantial number of small entities under the Regulatory
Flexibility Act (5 U.S.C. 601 et seq.);
     Does not contain any unfunded mandate or significantly or
uniquely affect small governments, as described in the Unfunded
Mandates Reform Act of 1995 (Pub. L. 104-4);
     Does not have federalism implications as specified in
Executive Order 13132 (64 FR 43255, August 10, 1999);
     Is not an economically significant regulatory action based
on health or safety risks subject to Executive Order 13045 (62 FR
19885, April 23, 1997);
     Is not a significant regulatory action subject to
Executive Order 13211 (66 FR 28355, May 22, 2001);

     Is not subject to requirements of Section 12(d) of the
National Technology Transfer and Advancement Act of 1995 (15 U.S.C. 272
note) because application of those requirements would be inconsistent
with the CAA; and
     Does not provide EPA with the discretionary authority to
address, as appropriate, disproportionate human health or environmental
effects, using practicable and legally permissible methods, under
Executive Order 12898 (59 FR 7629, February 16, 1994).
    In addition, the SIP is not approved to apply on any Indian
reservation land or in any other area where EPA or an Indian tribe has
demonstrated that a tribe has jurisdiction. In those areas of Indian
country, the rule does not have tribal implications and will not impose
substantial direct costs on tribal governments or preempt tribal law as
specified by Executive Order 13175 (65 FR 67249, November 9, 2000).

List of Subjects in 40 CFR Part 52

    Environmental protection, Air pollution control, Carbon monoxide,
Incorporation by reference, Intergovernmental relations, Lead, Nitrogen
dioxide, Ozone, Particulate matter, Reporting and recordkeeping
requirements, Sulfur oxides, Volatile organic compounds.

    Dated: February 22, 2021.
Cheryl Newton,
Acting Regional Administrator, Region 5.
[FR Doc. 2021-03984 Filed 2-25-21; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6560-50-P


[Federal Register Volume 77, Number 78 (Monday, April 23, 2012)]
[Notices]
[Pages 24251-24252]
[FR Doc No: 2012-9743]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION

Federal Aviation Administration

Consensus Standards, Light-Sport Aircraft

AGENCY: Federal Aviation Administration, DOT.

ACTION: Notice of availability; request for comments.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: This notice announces the availability of three new and three
revised consensus standards relating to the provisions of the Sport
Pilot and Light-Sport Aircraft rule issued July 16, 2004, and effective
September 1, 2004. ASTM International Committee F37 on Light Sport
Aircraft developed the new and revised standards with Federal Aviation
Administration (FAA) participation. By this notice, the FAA finds the
new and revised standards acceptable for certification of the specified
aircraft under the provisions of the Sport Pilot and Light-Sport
Aircraft rule.

DATES: Comments must be received on or before June 22, 2012.

ADDRESSES: Comments may be mailed to: Federal Aviation Administration,
Small Airplane Directorate, Programs and Procedures Branch, ACE-114,
Attention: Terry Chasteen, Room 301, 901 Locust, Kansas City, Missouri
64106. Comments may also be emailed to<EMAIL_ADDRESS>
All comments must be marked: Consensus Standards Comments, and must
specify the standard being addressed by ASTM designation and title.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Terry Chasteen, Light-Sport Aircraft
Program Manager, Programs and Procedures Branch (ACE-114), Small
Airplane Directorate, Aircraft Certification Service, Federal Aviation
Administration, 901 Locust, Room 301, Kansas City, Missouri 64106;
telephone<PHONE_NUMBER>; email<EMAIL_ADDRESS>
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: This notice announces the availability of
three new and three revised consensus standards relating to the
provisions of the Sport Pilot and Light-Sport Aircraft rule. ASTM
International Committee F37 on Light Sport Aircraft developed the new
and revised standards. The FAA expects a suitable consensus standard to
be reviewed at least every two years. The two-year review cycle will
result in a standard revision or reapproval. A standard is issued under
a fixed designation (i.e., F2244); the number immediately following the
designation indicates the year of original adoption or, in the case of
revision, the year of last revision. A number in parentheses indicates
the year of last reapproval. A reapproval indicates a two-year review
cycle completed with no technical changes. A superscript epsilon
([egr]) indicates an editorial change since the last revision or
reapproval. A notice of availability (NOA) will only be issued for new
or revised standards. Reapproved standards issued with no technical
changes or standards issued with editorial changes only (i.e.,
superscript epsilon ([egr])) are considered accepted by the FAA without
need for a NOA.
    Comments Invited: Interested persons are invited to submit such
written data, views, or arguments, as they may desire. Communications
should identify the consensus standard number and be submitted to the
address specified above. All communications received on or before the
closing date for comments will be forwarded to ASTM International
Committee F37 for consideration. The standard may be changed in light
of the comments received. The FAA will address all comments received
during the recurring review of the consensus standard and will
participate in the consensus standard revision process.
    Background: Under the provisions of the Sport Pilot and Light-Sport
Aircraft rule, and revised Office of Management and Budget (OMB)
Circular A-119, ``Federal Participation in the Development and Use of
Voluntary Consensus Standards and in Conformity Assessment
Activities'', dated February 10, 1998, industry and the FAA have been
working with ASTM International to develop consensus standards for
light-sport aircraft. These consensus standards satisfy the FAA's goal
for airworthiness certification and a verifiable minimum safety level
for light-sport aircraft. Instead of developing airworthiness standards
through the rulemaking process, the FAA participates as a member of
Committee F37 in developing these standards. The use of the consensus
standard process assures government and industry discussion and
agreement on appropriate standards for the required level of safety.

Comments on Previous Notices of Availability

    In the Notice of Availability (NOA) issued on July 20, 2011, and
published in the Federal Register on July 29, 2011 the FAA asked for
public comments on the new and revised consensus standards accepted by
that NOA. The comment period closed on September

27, 2011. No public comments were received regarding the standards
accepted by this NOA.

Consensus Standards in This Notice of Availability

    The FAA has reviewed the standards presented in this NOA for
compliance with the regulatory requirements of the rule. Any light-
sport aircraft issued a special light-sport airworthiness certificate,
which has been designed, manufactured, operated and maintained, in
accordance with this and previously accepted ASTM consensus standards
provides the public with the appropriate level of safety established
under the regulations. Manufacturers who choose to produce these
aircraft and certificate these aircraft under 14 CFR part 21,
Sec. Sec.  21.190 or 21.191 are subject to the applicable consensus
standard requirements. The FAA maintains a listing of all accepted
standards on the FAA Web site.

The Revised Consensus Standard and Effective Period of Use

    The following previously accepted consensus standards have been
revised, and this NOA is accepting the later revision. Either the
previous revision or the later revision may be used for the initial
certification of special light-sport aircraft until October 22, 2012.
This overlapping period of time will allow aircraft that have started
the initial certification process using the previous revision level to
complete that process. After October 22, 2012, manufacturers must use
the later revision and must identify the later revision in the
Statement of Compliance for initial certification of special light-
sport aircraft unless the FAA publishes a specific notification
otherwise. The following Consensus Standards may not be used after
October 22, 2012:
    ASTM Designation F2245-10c, titled: Standard Specification for
Design and Performance of a Light Sport Airplane.
    ASTM Designation F2352-09, titled: Standard Specification for
Design and Performance of Light Sport Gyroplane Aircraft.
    ASTM Designation F2564-09, titled: Standard Specification for
Design and Performance of a Light Sport Glider

The Consensus Standards

    The FAA finds the following new and revised consensus standards
acceptable for certification of the specified aircraft under the
provisions of the Sport Pilot and Light-Sport Aircraft rule. The
following consensus standards become effective April 23, 2012 and may
be used unless the FAA publishes a specific notification otherwise:
    ASTM Designation F2245-11, titled: Standard Specification for
Design and Performance of a Light Sport Airplane.
    ASTM Designation F2352-11, titled: Standard Specification for
Design and Performance of Light Sport Gyroplane Aircraft.
    ASTM Designation F2564-11, titled: Standard Specification for
Design and Performance of a Light Sport Glider
    ASTM Designation F2745-11, titled: Standard Specification for
Required Product Information to be Provided with an Airplane.
    ASTM Designation F2839-11, titled: Standard Practice for Compliance
Audits to ASTM Standards on Light Sport Aircraft.
    ASTM Designation F2840-11, titled: Standard Practice for Design and
Manufacture of Electric Propulsion Units for Light Sport Aircraft.

Availability

    These consensus standards are copyrighted by ASTM International,
100 Barr Harbor Drive, PO Box C700, West Conshohocken, PA 19428-2959.
Individual reprints of a standard (single or multiple copies, or
special compilations and other related technical information) may be
obtained by contacting ASTM at this address, or at<PHONE_NUMBER>
(phone),<PHONE_NUMBER> (fax), through<EMAIL_ADDRESS>(email), or
through the ASTM Web site at www.astm.org. To inquire about standard
content and/or membership or about ASTM International Offices abroad,
contact Christine DeJong, Staff Manager for Committee F37 on Light
Sport Aircraft:<PHONE_NUMBER><EMAIL_ADDRESS>
    Issued in Kansas City, Missouri, on February 22, 2012.
John R. Colomy,
Acting Manager, Small Airplane Directorate, Aircraft Certification
Service.
[FR Doc. 2012-9743 Filed 4-20-12; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE P