[Federal Register: March 31, 2008 (Volume 73, Number 62)]
[Proposed Rules]
[Page 16779-16782]
[DOCID:fr31mr08-22]

=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION

Federal Aviation Administration

14 CFR Part 39

[Docket No. FAA-2008-0367; Directorate Identifier 2007-CE-089-AD]
RIN 2120-AA64

Airworthiness Directives; Viking Air Limited Models DHC-6-1, DHC-
6-100, DHC-6-200, and DHC-6-300 Airplanes

AGENCY: Federal Aviation Administration (FAA), Department of
Transportation (DOT).

ACTION: Notice of proposed rulemaking (NPRM).

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: We propose to adopt a new airworthiness directive (AD) for the
products listed above. This proposed AD results from mandatory
continuing airworthiness information (MCAI) originated by an aviation
authority of another country to identify and correct an unsafe
condition on an aviation product. The MCAI describes the unsafe
condition as:

    Service experience indicates that as aircraft become older, they
are more likely to exhibit indications of corrosion.

Additionally, the FAA has reviewed the service experience and finds
this action to be necessary based upon that service experience. The
proposed AD would require actions that are intended to address the
unsafe condition described in the MCAI.

DATES: We must receive comments on this proposed AD by April 30, 2008.

ADDRESSES: You may send comments by any of the following methods:
     Federal eRulemaking Portal: Go to http://
www.regulations.gov. Follow the instructions for submitting comments.
     Fax:<PHONE_NUMBER>.
     Mail: U.S. Department of Transportation, Docket
Operations, M-30, West Building Ground Floor, Room W12-140, 1200 New
Jersey Avenue, SE., Washington, DC 20590.
     Hand Delivery: U.S. Department of Transportation, Docket
Operations, M-30, West Building Ground Floor, Room W12-140, 1200 New
Jersey Avenue, SE., Washington, DC 20590, between 9 a.m. and 5 p.m.,
Monday through Friday, except Federal holidays.

Examining the AD Docket

    You may examine the AD docket on the Internet at http://
www.regulations.gov; or in person at the Docket Management Facility
between 9 a.m. and 5 p.m., Monday through Friday, except Federal
holidays. The AD docket contains this proposed AD, the regulatory
evaluation, any comments received, and other information. The street
address for the Docket Office (telephone<PHONE_NUMBER>) is in the
ADDRESSES section. Comments will be available in the AD docket shortly
after receipt.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Richard Beckwith, Aerospace Engineer,
FAA, New York Aircraft Certification Office,1600 Stewart Avenue, Suite
410, Westbury, New York 11590; telephone:<PHONE_NUMBER>; fax: (516)
568-2716.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

Comments Invited

    We invite you to send any written relevant data, views, or
arguments about this proposed AD. Send your comments to an address
listed under the ADDRESSES section. Include ``Docket No. FAA-2008-0367;
Directorate Identifier 2007-CE-089-AD'' at the beginning of your
comments. We specifically invite comments on the overall regulatory,
economic, environmental, and energy aspects of this proposed AD. We
will consider all comments received by the closing date and may amend
this proposed AD because of those comments.
    We will post all comments we receive, without change, to http://
www.regulations.gov, including any personal information you provide. We
will also post a report summarizing each substantive verbal contact we
receive about this proposed AD.

Discussion

    Transport Canada, which is the aviation authority for Canada, has
issued AD No. CF-94-12R1, dated April 13, 1999; and AD No. CF-99-11,
dated May 28, 1999 (referred to after this as ``the MCAI''), to correct
an unsafe condition for the specified products. The MCAI states:

    Service experience indicates that as aircraft become older, they
are more likely to exhibit indications of corrosion. Transport
Canada, in conjunction with other airworthiness authorities, has
committed itself to ensuring that additional maintenance programs
for older aircraft are developed and implemented to minimize and
control corrosive deterioration that could jeopardize airworthiness.
Bombardier Inc., as manufacturer of the DHC-6 aircraft, has
developed a Corrosion Prevention and Control Program which
identifies specific areas that must be inspected to ensure the
structural integrity of the DHC-6 fleet.

Additionally, the FAA has reviewed the service experience of the Viking
Air Limited Models DHC-6-1, DHC-6-100, DHC-6-200, and DHC-6-300
airplanes and finds this action to be necessary based upon that service
experience.
    The MCAI requires that you do the corrosion tasks required by the
corrosion prevention and control program. You may obtain further
information by examining the MCAI in the AD docket.

Relevant Service Information

    Viking Air Limited has issued DHC-6 Twin Otter (Series 100/200/300)
Corrosion Prevention and Control Manual PSM 1-6-5, Revision 3, dated
January 15, 2007; Viking Temporary Revision, C57-10-18 (TR 2-2), dated
December 19, 2007; Viking Temporary Revision, Part 3, Supplement 1 (TR
3-2), dated December 19, 2007; Viking Temporary Revision, Part 3,
Supplement 1 (TR 3-3), dated December 19, 2007; and Viking Temporary
Revision, Part 3, Supplement 1, (TR 3-4), dated December 19, 2007. The
actions described in this service information are intended to correct
the unsafe condition identified in the MCAI.

FAA's Determination and Requirements of the Proposed AD

    This product has been approved by the aviation authority of another
country, and is approved for operation in the United States. Pursuant
to our bilateral agreement with this State of Design Authority, they
have notified us of the unsafe condition described in the MCAI and
service information referenced above together with the fact that the
FAA has reviewed the service experience and finds this action to be
necessary based upon that service experience. We are proposing this AD
because we evaluated all information and determined the unsafe
condition exists and is likely to exist or develop on other products of
the same type design.

Differences Between This Proposed AD and the MCAI or Service
Information

    We have reviewed the MCAI and related service information and, in
general, agree with their substance. But we might have found it
necessary to use different words from those in the MCAI to ensure the
AD is clear for U.S. operators and is enforceable. In making these
changes, we do not intend to differ substantively from the information
provided in the MCAI and related service information.
    We might also have proposed different actions in this AD from those
in the MCAI in order to follow FAA policies. Any such differences are
highlighted in a NOTE within the proposed AD.

Costs of Compliance

    We estimate that this proposed AD would affect about 162 products
of U.S. registry. We also estimate that it would take about 40 work-
hours per product to comply with the basic requirements of this
proposed AD. The average labor rate is $80 per work-hour.
    Based on these figures, we estimate the cost of the proposed AD on
U.S. operators to be $518,400, or $3,200 per product.

Authority for This Rulemaking

    Title 49 of the United States Code specifies the FAA's authority to
issue rules on aviation safety. Subtitle I, section 106, describes the
authority of the FAA Administrator. ``Subtitle VII: Aviation Programs''
describes in more detail the scope of the Agency's authority.
    We are issuing this rulemaking under the authority described in
``Subtitle VII, Part A, Subpart III, Section 44701: General
requirements.'' Under that section, Congress charges the FAA with
promoting safe flight of civil aircraft in air commerce by prescribing
regulations for practices, methods, and procedures the Administrator
finds necessary for safety in air commerce. This regulation is within
the scope of that authority because it addresses an unsafe condition
that is likely to exist or develop on products identified in this
rulemaking action.

Regulatory Findings

    We determined that this proposed AD would not have federalism
implications under Executive Order 13132. This proposed AD would not
have a substantial direct effect on the States, on the relationship
between the national Government and the States, or on the distribution
of power and responsibilities among the various levels of government.
    For the reasons discussed above, I certify this proposed
regulation:
    1. Is not a ``significant regulatory action'' under Executive Order
12866;
    2. Is not a ``significant rule'' under the DOT Regulatory Policies
and Procedures (44 FR 11034, February 26, 1979); and
    3. Will not have a significant economic impact, positive or
negative, on a substantial number of small entities under the criteria
of the Regulatory Flexibility Act.

    We prepared a regulatory evaluation of the estimated costs to
comply with this proposed AD and placed it in the AD docket.

List of Subjects in 14 CFR Part 39

    Air transportation, Aircraft, Aviation safety, Safety.

The Proposed Amendment

    Accordingly, under the authority delegated to me by the
Administrator, the FAA proposes to amend 14 CFR part 39 as follows:

PART 39--AIRWORTHINESS DIRECTIVES

    1. The authority citation for part 39 continues to read as follows:

    Authority: 49 U.S.C. 106(g), 40113, 44701.

Sec.  39.13  [Amended]

    2. The FAA amends Sec.  39.13 by adding the following new AD:

Viking Air Limited: Docket No. FAA-2008-0367; Directorate Identifier
2007-CE-089-AD.

Comments Due Date

    (a) We must receive comments by April 30, 2008.

Affected ADs

    (b) None.

Applicability

    (c) This AD applies to Models DHC-6-1, DHC-6-100, DHC-6-200, and
DHC-6-300 airplanes, serial numbers (SNs) 001 through 844,
certificated in any category.

Subject

    (d) Air Transport Association of America (ATA) Code 51:
Structures.

Reason

    (e) The mandatory continuing airworthiness information (MCAI)
states:

    Service experience indicates that as aircraft become older, they
are more likely to exhibit indications of corrosion. Transport
Canada, in conjunction with other airworthiness authorities, has
committed itself to ensuring that additional maintenance programs
for older aircraft are developed and implemented to minimize and
control corrosive deterioration that could jeopardize airworthiness.
Bombardier Inc., as manufacturer of the DHC-6 aircraft, has
developed a Corrosion Prevention and Control Program which
identifies specific areas that must be inspected to ensure the
structural integrity of the DHC-6 fleet.

Additionally, the FAA has reviewed the service experience of the
Viking Air Limited Models DHC-6-1, DHC-6-100, DHC-6-200, and DHC-6-
300 airplanes and finds this action to be necessary based upon that
service experience. The MCAI requires that you do the corrosion
tasks (CTs) required by the corrosion prevention and control
program.

Actions and Compliance

    (f) Unless already done, do the following actions:
    (1) Within the next 90 days after the effective date of this AD,
develop a schedule for doing the initial and repeat CTs required in
paragraph (f)(2) and (f)(3) of this AD.
    (2) Initially, do all of the seven basic CTs defined at
paragraph 3.0 of Part 3 of DHC-6 Twin Otter (Series 100/200/300)
Corrosion Prevention and Control Manual PSM 1-6-5, Revision 3, dated
January 15, 2007; and the temporary revisions listed in Table 1,
Viking Temporary Revisions, of this AD:

                  Table 1.--Viking Temporary Revisions
------------------------------------------------------------------------
                     Temporary revision no. and date
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
(i) Viking Temporary Revision, C57-10-18 (TR 2-2), dated December 19,
 2007.
(ii) Viking Temporary Revision, Part 3, Supplement 1 (TR 3-2), dated
 December 19, 2007.
(iii) Viking Temporary Revision, Part 3, Supplement 1 (TR 3-3), dated
 December 19, 2007.
(iv) Viking Temporary Revision, Part 3, Supplement 1, (TR 3-4), dated
 December 19, 2007.
------------------------------------------------------------------------

Determine corrosion level following the definitions contained in the
introduction section of DHC-6 Twin Otter (Series 100/200/300)
Corrosion Prevention and Control Manual PSM 1-6-5, Revision 3, dated
January 15, 2007. The initial accomplishment deadlines are specified
in Table 2, Initial Accomplishment Deadline, of this AD:

                Table 2.--Initial Accomplishment Deadline
------------------------------------------------------------------------
                                         Initial accomplishment deadline
   Applicable airplane serial numbers    for all airplanes in applicable
                                                    S/N range
------------------------------------------------------------------------
(i) 001 through 199....................  15 months after the effective
                                          date of this AD.
(ii) 200 through 439...................  27 months after the effective
                                          date of this AD.
(iii) 440 through 659..................  51 months after the effective
                                          date of this AD.
(iv) 660 through 844...................  63 months after the effective
                                          date of this AD.
------------------------------------------------------------------------

    (3) After the initial completion of each CT, repeat each CT at
the repeat interval (R) specified in the manual. Determine corrosion
level following the definitions contained in the introduction
section of DHC-6 Twin Otter (Series 100/200/300) Corrosion
Prevention and Control Manual PSM 1-6-5, Revision 3, dated January
15, 2007.
    (4) If any corrosion is found during any action required by this
AD, before further flight, address corrosion following paragraph 4.0
of Part 3 of DHC-6 Twin Otter (Series 100/200/300) Corrosion
Prevention and Control Manual PSM 1-6-5, Revision 3, dated January
15, 2007. All repairs are to be done following a method approved by
the Manager, New York Aircraft Certification Office or Transport
Canada Civil Aviation (or its delegated agent).
    (5) Within 21 days after the finding of Level 3 corrosion,
submit a plan to the FAA to identify a schedule for accomplishing
the applicable CTs on the remainder of the airplanes in the
operator's fleet that are subject to this AD or data substantiating
that the Level 3 corrosion that was found is an isolated case. The
FAA may impose a schedule other than proposed in the plan upon
finding that a change to the schedule is needed to ensure that any
other Level 3 corrosion is detected in a timely manner. For the
purposes of this paragraph, the FAA is defined as the cognizant
principal maintenance inspector (PMI) for operators that are
assigned a PMI (e.g., part 121, 125, and 135 operators) and the
cognizant flight standards district office for other operators
(e.g., part 91 operators).
    (6) If any Level 3 corrosion is found while doing any action
required by this AD, within 21 days after the finding of Level 3
corrosion, report the finding on the form in Figure 1 of this AD and
send it to Viking Air Limited, VP Engineering, 9574 Hampden Road,
Sidney, British Columbia, Canada V8L 5V5.
    (7) Incorporation of the initial and repeat CTs into your FAA-
approved maintenance program constitutes terminating action for this
AD. If this AD is terminated in this way, then the maintenance
program must be in accordance with this AD.

FAA AD Differences

    Note: This AD differs from the MCAI and/or service information
as follows: No differences.

Other FAA AD Provisions

    (g) The following provisions also apply to this AD:
    (1) Alternative Methods of Compliance (AMOCs): The Manager, New
York Aircraft Certification Office (ACO), FAA, has the authority to
approve AMOCs for this AD, if requested using the procedures found
in 14 CFR 39.19. Send information to ATTN: Richard Beckwith,
Aerospace Engineer, FAA, New York ACO, 1600 Stewart Avenue, Suite
410, Westbury, New York 11590; telephone:<PHONE_NUMBER>; fax: (516)
568-2716. Before using any approved AMOC on any airplane to which
the AMOC applies, notify your

appropriate PMI in the FAA Flight Standards District Office (FSDO),
or lacking a PMI, your local FSDO.
    (2) Airworthy Product: For any requirement in this AD to obtain
corrective actions from a manufacturer or other source, use these
actions if they are FAA-approved. Corrective actions are considered
FAA-approved if they are approved by the State of Design Authority
(or their delegated agent). You are required to assure the product
is airworthy before it is returned to service.
    (3) Reporting Requirements: For any reporting requirement in
this AD, under the provisions of the Paperwork Reduction Act (44
U.S.C. 3501 et seq.), the Office of Management and Budget (OMB) has
approved the information collection requirements and has assigned
OMB Control Number 2120-0056.

                        Docket No. FAA-2008-0367
                            Inspection Report
               [Report only if you find level 3 corrosion]
------------------------------------------------------------------------

------------------------------------------------------------------------
1. Operator:                                2. Telephone:
------------------------------------------------------------------------
3. Airplane Model Number:                   4. Airplane Serial Number:
------------------------------------------------------------------------
5. Airplane Tail Number:                    6. Date of Inspection:
------------------------------------------------------------------------
7. Corrosion Task:

------------------------------------------------------------------------
8. Description & Specific Location of Findings:

------------------------------------------------------------------------
9. Additional Comments of Owner/Operator:

------------------------------------------------------------------------
Send to:

Viking Air Limited
VP Engineering
9574 Hampden Road
Sidney, British Columbia, Canada
V8L 5V5

Telephone:<PHONE_NUMBER>
Fax:<PHONE_NUMBER>

------------------------------------------------------------------------

                                Figure 1.

Related Information

    (h) Refer to MCAI Transport Canada AD No. CF-94-12R1, dated
April 13, 1999; and Transport Canada AD No. CF-99-11, dated May 28,
1999; and DHC-6 Twin Otter (Series 100/200/300) Corrosion Prevention
and Control Manual PSM 1-6-5, Revision 3, dated January 15, 2007;
and the temporary revisions listed in Table 1--Viking Temporary
Revisions, of this AD, for related information.

David R. Showers,
Acting Manager, Small Airplane Directorate, Aircraft Certification
Service.
[FR Doc. E8-6468 Filed 3-28-08; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4910-13-P


CALIFORNIA AIR RESOURCES BOARD

SIP COMPLETENESS CHECKLIST

(Electronic Format)

*** TO BE COMPLETED BY DISTRICT AND RETURNED TO ARB ***

All rules submitted to the EPA as State Implementation Plan (SIP)
revisions must be supported by certain information and documentation for
the rule packages to be deemed complete for review by the EPA.  Rules
will not be evaluated for approvability by the EPA unless the submittal
packages are complete.  To assist you in determining that all necessary
materials are included in rules packages sent to the ARB for submittal
to the EPA, please fill out the following form and include it with the
rule package you send ARB.  See the ARB's Guidelines on the
Implementation of the 40 CFR 51, Appendix V, for a more detailed
explanation than is provided here.  Adopted rules and rule amendments
should be checked against U.S. EPA's Guidance Document for Correcting
Common VOC & Other Rule Deficiencies (Little Blue Book, August 21, 2001)
to ensure that they contain no elements which will result in disapproval
by EPA.

District  SJVUAPCD           Rule
No.      4565                Date   Adopted March
15, 2007.

Rule Title      Rule 4565 (Biosolids, Animal Manure, and Poultry
Litter Operations)

ADMINISTRATIVE MATERIALS

Note:  All documents should be in electronic format.  Items that have
signatures, initials, or stamps may be scanned.

		Not

Attached	Attached	N/A

(X)		( )		( )	COMPLETE COPY OF THE RULE:  Provide an unmarked copy of
the entire rule as adopted or amended by your District Board.

( )		( )		(X)	UNDERLINE AND STRIKEOUT COPY OF THE RULE:  If an amended
rule, provide a complete copy of the rule indicating in underline and
strikeout format all language which has been added, deleted, or changed
since the rule was last adopted or amended.

( )		( )		(X)	COMPLETE COPY OF THE REFERENCED RULE(S):  For any rule
which includes language specifically referencing another rule, a copy of
that other rule must also be submitted, unless it has already been
submitted to EPA as part of a previous SIP submittal.

(X)		( )		( )	PUBLIC NOTICE EVIDENCE:  Include a copy of the local
newspaper clipping certification(s), stating the date of publication,
which must be at least 30 days before the hearing.  As an alternative,
include a copy of the actual published notice of the public hearing as
it appeared in the local newspaper(s). In this case, however, enough of
the newspaper page must be included to show the date of publication.
The notice must specifically identify by title and number each rule
adopted or amended.

(X)		( )		( )	RESOLUTION/MINUTE ORDER:  Provide the Board Clerk
certified resolution or minute order.  This document must include
certification that the hearing was held in accordance with the
information in the public notice.  It must also list the rules that were
adopted or amended, the date of the public hearing, and a statement of
compliance with California Health and Safety Code Sections 40725-40728
(Administrative Procedures Act).

()		( )		(X)	PUBLIC COMMENTS AND RESPONSES:  Submit copies of written
public comments made during the notice period and at the public hearing.
 Also submit any written responses prepared by the District staff or
presented to the District Board at the public hearing.  A summary of the
public comments and responses is adequate.  If there were no comments
made during the notice period or at the hearing, please indicate N/A to
the left.

CALIFORNIA AIR RESOURCES BOARD

SIP COMPLETENESS CHECKLIST

(Electronic Format)

TECHNICAL MATERIALS

Note:  All documents and forms should be in electronic format.

		Not

Attached	Attached	N/A

(X)		( )		( )	RULE EVALUATION FORM:  See instructions for completing the
Rule Evaluation Form and the accompanying sample form.

(X)		( )		()	NON-EPA TEST METHODS:  Attach all test methods that are
referenced in your rule that do not appear in 40 CFR 51, 60, 61, 63, or
have not been previously submitted to EPA.  EPA methods used in other
media such as SW846 for solid waste are not automatically approved for
air pollution applications.  Submittal of test methods that are not
EPA-approved should include the information and follow the procedure
described in Region 9’s “Test Method Review & Evaluation Process.”

( )		( )		(X)	MODELING SUPPORT:  Provide if appropriate.  In general,
modeling support is not required for VOC and NOx rules to determine
their impacts on ozone levels.  Modeling is required where a rule is a
relaxation that affects large sources (> 100 TPY) in an attainment area
for SO2, directly emitted PM10, CO, or NOx (for NO2 purposes).  In cases
where EPA is concerned with the impact on air quality of rule revisions
which relax limits or cause a shift in emission patterns in a
nonattainment area, a reference back to the approved SIP will be
sufficient provided the approved SIP accounts for the relaxation and
provided the approved SIP used the current EPA modeling guidelines.  If
current EPA modeling guidelines were not used, then new modeling may be
required.

( )		( )		(X)	ECONOMIC AND TECHNICAL JUSTIFICATION FOR DEVIATIONS FROM
EPA POLICIES:  The District staff report or other information included
with the submittal should discuss all potential relaxations or
deviations from RACT, RACM, BACT, BACM, enforceability, attainment, RFP,
or other relevant EPA requirements.  This includes, for example,
demonstrating that exemptions or emission limits less stringent than the
presumptive RACT (e.g., a CTG) meet EPA’s 5 percent policy, and
demonstrating that all source categories exempted from a RACM/BACM rule
are de minimus according to EPA’s RACM/BACM policy.

(X)		( )		( )	ADDITIONAL MATERIALS:  Provide District staff reports and
any other supporting information concerning development of the rule or
rule changes.  This information should explain the basis for all limits
and thresholds contained in the rule.


[Federal Register Volume 80, Number 123 (Friday, June 26, 2015)]
[Notices]
[Pages 36875-36877]
[FR Doc No: 2015-15687]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

[Release No. 34-75254; File No. SR-CHX-2015-04]

Self-Regulatory Organizations; Chicago Stock Exchange, Inc.;
Notice of Filing and Immediate Effectiveness of a Proposed Rule Change
To Eliminate the Change in Business Form Fee

June 22, 2015.
    Pursuant to section 19(b)(1) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934
(``Act''),\1\ and Rule 19b-4 \2\ thereunder, notice is hereby given
that on June 15, 2015, the Chicago Stock Exchange, Inc. (``CHX'' or the
``Exchange'') filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission
(``SEC'' or ``Commission'') the proposed rule change as described in
Items I, II, and III, below, which Items

have been prepared by the Exchange. The Commission is publishing this
notice to solicit comments on the proposed rule change from interested
persons.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \1\ 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(1).
    \2\ 17 CFR 240.19b-4.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

I. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement of the Terms of Substance
of the Proposed Rule Change

    CHX proposes to amend section C of the Fee Schedule of CHX (``Fee
Schedule'') to eliminate the change in business form fee. The text of
this proposed rule change is available on the Exchange's Web site at
(www.chx.com) and in the Commission's Public Reference Room.

II. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement of the Purpose of, and
Statutory Basis for, the Proposed Rule Change

    In its filing with the Commission, the CHX included statements
concerning the purpose of and basis for the proposed rule changes and
discussed any comments it received on the proposed rule change. The
text of these statements may be examined at the places specified in
Item IV below. The CHX has prepared summaries, set forth in sections A,
B and C below, of the most significant aspects of such statements.

A. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement of the Purpose of, and
Statutory Basis for, the Proposed Rule Change

1. Purpose
    The Exchange proposes to amend section C of the Fee Schedule to
eliminate the change in business form fee. Currently, the Exchange
charges a $200 fee for any Participant that changes its form of
business (e.g., from a partnership to a limited liability corporation)
to cover the administrative costs of tracking and verifying such
changes. However, the Exchange believes that the $200.00 change in
business form fee has become unnecessary, in light of the recent
amendment to the Trading Permit application fee, which was increased
from $200 to $2,000 per application.\3\ Aside from the elimination of
the change in business form fee, the Exchange does not propose to
substantively modify any other fees, assessments, credits or rebates.
The Exchange proposes to make this proposed rule change operative July
1, 2015.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \3\ See section A of the Fee Schedule; see also Exchange Act
Release No. 73906 (December 22, 2014), 79 FR 78541 (December 30,
2014) (SR-CHX-2014-20).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

2. Statutory Basis
    The Exchange believes that the proposed rule change is consistent
with section 6(b) of the Act \4\ in general, and furthers the
objectives of sections 6(b)(4) of the Act \5\ in particular, as the
proposed rule provides for the equitable allocation of reasonable dues,
fees and other charges among members and other persons using its
facilities. Specifically, the Exchange believes that the proposed
elimination of the change in business form fee will be applied in a
non-discriminatory manner as the fee will no longer be assessed to any
Participants.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \4\ 15 U.S.C. 78f.
    \5\ 15 U.S.C. 78f(b)(4).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

B. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement on Burden on Competition

    The Exchange does not believe that the proposed rule change will
impose any burden on competition that is not necessary or appropriate
in furtherance of the purposes of the Act. To the contrary, the
proposed elimination of the change in business form fee will reduce the
number of fees assessed to Participants, which will enhance
competition. The Exchange operates in a highly competitive market in
which market participants can readily direct order flow to competing
venues if they deem fee levels set by the Exchange to be excessive.
Thus, the proposed rule change is a competitive proposal that is
intended to retain Participants at, and draw prospective Participants
to, the Exchange by, among other things, providing a simplified Fee
Schedule.

C. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement on Comments on the Proposed
Rule Change Received From Members, Participants, or Others

    No written comments were either solicited or received.

III. Date of Effectiveness of the Proposed Rule Change and Timing for
Commission Action

    The foregoing rule change is effective upon filing pursuant to
section 19(b)(3)(A)(ii) of the Act \6\ and subparagraph(f)(2) of Rule
19b-4 thereunder \7\ because it establishes or changes a due, fee or
other charge imposed by the Exchange.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \6\ 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(3)(A)(ii).
    \7\ 17 CFR 240.19b-4(f)(2).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    At any time within 60 days of the filing of the proposed rule
change, the Commission summarily may temporarily suspend such rule
change if it appears to the Commission that such action is necessary or
appropriate in the public interest, for the protection of investors, or
otherwise in furtherance of the purposes of the Act. If the Commission
takes such action, the Commission shall institute proceedings to
determine whether the proposed rule should be approved or disapproved.

IV. Solicitation of Comments

    Interested persons are invited to submit written data, views, and
arguments concerning the foregoing, including whether the proposed rule
change is consistent with the Act. Comments may be submitted by any of
the following methods:

Electronic Comments

     Use the Commission's Internet comment form (http://www.sec.gov/rules/sro.shtml); or
     Send an email to<EMAIL_ADDRESS>Please include
File Number SR-CHX-2015-04 on the subject line.

Paper Comments

     Send paper comments in triplicate to Secretary, Securities
and Exchange Commission, 100 F Street NE., Washington, DC 20549-1090.

All submissions should refer to File Number SR-CHX-2015-04. This file
number should be included on the subject line if email is used. To help
the Commission process and review your comments more efficiently,
please use only one method. The Commission will post all comments on
the Commission's Internet Web site (http://www.sec.gov/rules/sro.shtml). Copies of the submission, all subsequent amendments, all
written statements with respect to the proposed rule change that are
filed with the Commission, and all written communications relating to
the proposed rule change between the Commission and any person, other
than those that may be withheld from the public in accordance with the
provisions of 5 U.S.C. 552, will be available for Web site viewing and
printing in the Commission's Public Reference Room, 100 F Street NE.,
Washington, DC 20549, on official business days between the hours of
10:00 a.m. and 3:00 p.m. Copies of such filing also will be available
for inspection and copying at the principal office of the Exchange. All
comments received will be posted without change; the Commission does
not edit personal identifying information from submissions. You should
submit only information that you wish to make available publicly. All
submissions should refer to File Number SR-CHX-

2015-04 and should be submitted on or before July 17, 2015.

    For the Commission, by the Division of Trading and Markets,
pursuant to delegated authority.\8\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \8\ 17 CFR 200.30-3(a)(12).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

Robert W. Errett,
Deputy Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2015-15687 Filed 6-25-15; 8:45 am]
 BILLING CODE 8011-01-P


[Federal Register: June 22, 2006 (Volume 71, Number 120)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Page 35804]
[DOCID:fr22jn06-15]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY

40 CFR Part 52

[EPA-R04-OAR-2005-KY-0002-200531(c); FRL-8187-4]

Approval and Promulgation of Implementation Plans and Designation
of Areas for Air Quality Planning Purposes; Kentucky; Redesignation of
the Boyd County SO2 Nonattainment Area; Correction

AGENCY: Environmental Protection Agency (EPA).

ACTION: Direct final rule; correction.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: On May 24, 2006 (71 FR 29786), EPA published a direct final
document redesignating the Boyd County, Kentucky area to attainment for
SO2. The Federal Docket Management System (FDMS) docket
number was incorrectly referenced. This document corrects the docket
number.

DATES: This action is effective June 22, 2006.

ADDRESSES: Copies of the documentation used in the action being
corrected are available for inspection during normal business hours at
the following location: U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Region 4,
61 Forsyth Street, SW., Atlanta, Georgia 30303-8960. The Regional
Office's official hours of business are Monday through Friday, 8:30 to
4:30, excluding Federal holidays.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Stacy DiFrank, Regulatory Development
Section, Air Planning Branch, Air, Pesticides and Toxics Management
Division, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Region 4, 61 Forsyth
Street, SW., Atlanta, Georgia 30303-8960. The telephone number is (404)
562-9042. Ms. DiFrank can also be reached via electronic mail at
<EMAIL_ADDRESS>

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: EPA is making a correction to the document
published on May 24, 2006, (71 FR 29786), approving a Kentucky SIP
revision which redesignated the Boyd County Area to attainment for
SO2. The FDMS docket number ``R04-OAR-2005-KY-0002'' was
inadvertently stated in the May 24, 2006, document. The FDMS docket
number in the heading and the ADDRESSES section on page 29786 (in
columns one and two) of the final rule should read as follows: ``EPA-
R04-OAR-2005-KY-0002.''

List of Subjects in 40 CFR Part 52

    Environmental protection, Air pollution control, Intergovernmental
relations, Nitrogen dioxide, Ozone, Particulate matter, Reporting and
recordkeeping requirements, Volatile organic compounds.

    Authority: 42 U.S.C. 7401 et seq.

    Dated: June 12, 2006.
A. Stanley Meiburg,
Acting Regional Administrator, Region 4.
[FR Doc. 06-5602 Filed 6-21-06; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 6560-50-P


[Federal Register Volume 80, Number 64 (Friday, April 3, 2015)]
[Proposed Rules]
[Pages 18179-18184]
[FR Doc No: 2015-07478]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY

40 CFR Part 80

[EPA-HQ-OAR-2015-0049; FRL-9924-70-OAR]
RIN 2060-AS48

Regulation of Fuels and Fuel Additives: Cellulosic Waiver Credit
Price and Minor Amendments to Renewable Fuel Standard Regulations

AGENCY: Environmental Protection Agency (EPA).

ACTION: Proposed rule.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) is proposing to
clarify our regulations related to the data sources used to establish
the cellulosic waiver credit (CWC) price. We are also proposing to
remove references to CWC prices from the renewable fuel standard
regulations, and instead intend to post the prices on EPA's Web site.
This proposed rule also indicates what the CWC prices for 2014 and 2015
would be using the data sources and methodology contained in the rule;
however these prices will not be established until they are posted on
our Web site following the effective date of the rule. In addition, we
are proposing minor amendments to the renewable fuel standard program
regulations to reinsert sections inadvertently overwritten by the
Quality Assurance Program final rule published on July 18, 2014. In the
``Rules and Regulations'' section of this Federal Register, we are
making these same amendments as a direct final rule. If we receive no
adverse comment, the direct final rule will go into effect and we will
not take further action on this proposed rule.

DATES: A request for a public hearing must be received by April 20,
2015. If a public hearing request is received, EPA will publish a
notice in the Federal Register indicating the time and place for the
hearing. If a public hearing is held, written comments must be received
within 30 days after the date of the hearing. If no public hearing is
held then comments must be received on or before May 4, 2015.

ADDRESSES: Submit your comments, identified by Docket ID No. EPA-HQ-

OAR-2015-0049, by one of the following methods:
     www.regulations.gov: Follow the on-line instructions for
submitting comments.
     Email<EMAIL_ADDRESS>     Mail: Air and Radiation Docket and Information Center,
Environmental Protection Agency, Mailcode: 28221T, 1200 Pennsylvania
Ave. NW., Washington, DC 20460.
     Hand Delivery: EPA Docket Center, EPA WJC West Building,
Room 3334, 1301 Constitution Ave. NW., Washington, DC 20460. Such
deliveries are only accepted during the Docket's normal hours of
operation, and special arrangements should be made for deliveries of
boxed information.
    Instructions: Direct your comments to Docket ID No. EPA-HQ-OAR-
2015-0049. EPA's policy is that all comments received will be included
in the public docket without change and may be made available online at
www.regulations.gov, including any personal information provided,
unless the comment includes information claimed to be Confidential
Business Information (CBI) or other information whose disclosure is
restricted by statute. Do not submit information that you consider to
be CBI or otherwise protected through www.regulations.gov or email. The
www.regulations.gov Web site is an ``anonymous access'' system, which
means EPA will not know your identity or contact information unless you
provide it in the body of your comment. If you send an email comment
directly to EPA without going through www.regulations.gov your email
address will be automatically captured and included as part of the
comment that is placed in the public docket and made available on the
Internet. If you submit an electronic comment, EPA recommends that you
include your name and other contact information in the body of your
comment and with any disk or CD-ROM you submit. If EPA cannot read your
comment due to technical difficulties and cannot contact you for
clarification, EPA may not be able to consider your comment. Electronic
files should avoid the use of special characters, any form of
encryption, and be free of any defects or viruses. For additional
information about EPA's public docket visit the EPA Docket Center
homepage at http://www.epa.gov/epahome/dockets.htm. For additional
instructions on submitting comments, go to Section I.B of the
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION section of this document.
    Docket: All documents in the docket are listed in the
www.regulations.gov index. Although listed in the index, some
information is not publicly available, e.g., CBI or other information
whose disclosure is restricted by statute. Certain other material, such
as copyrighted material, will be publicly available only in hard copy.
Publicly available docket materials are available either electronically
in www.regulations.gov or in hard copy at the Air and Radiation Docket
and Information Center, EPA/DC, EPA WJC West, Room 3334, 1301
Constitution Ave. NW., Washington, DC. The Public Reading Room is open
from 8:30 a.m. to 4:30 p.m., Monday through Friday, excluding legal
holidays. The telephone number for the Public Reading Room is (202)
566-1744, and the telephone number for the Air Docket is (202) 566-
1742.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Julia MacAllister, Office of
Transportation and Air Quality, Assessment and Standards Division,
Environmental Protection Agency, 2000 Traverwood Drive, Ann Arbor, MI
48105; Telephone number:<PHONE_NUMBER>; Fax number:<PHONE_NUMBER>; Email
address<EMAIL_ADDRESS>or the public information line for
the Office of Transportation and Air Quality; telephone number (734)
214-4333; Email address<EMAIL_ADDRESS>
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

Why is EPA issuing a proposed rule?

    EPA is proposing to take action to clarify our regulations related
to the data sources used to establish the price for cellulosic waiver
credits (CWC). EPA is also proposing to remove the CWC prices from our
regulations so as to allow the prices to be established in a more
expeditious manner. The CWC prices would instead be published on EPA's
``Renewable Fuels: Regulations & Standards'' Web site (http://www.epa.gov/otaq/fuels/renewablefuels/regulations.htm). EPA is also
proposing to reinsert regulatory provisions in the renewable fuel
standard (RFS) program regulations that were inadvertently overwritten
by the Quality Assurance Program (QAP) final rule (79 FR 42078, July
18, 2014).
    Clarifying the data sources used in calculating the CWC price would
eliminate uncertainty regarding EPA's process in establishing the CWC
prices, would enable stakeholders to better predict the annual CWC
price before it is established, and would allow EPA to establish the
CWC price in a more timely manner. This action does not change the
formula used to establish the CWC price (listed in our regulations at
40 CFR 80.1456(d)).
    If we receive no relevant adverse comment or hearing request on the
direct final rule, we will not take further action on this proposed
rule. If EPA receives relevant adverse comment or a hearing request, we
will publish a timely withdrawal in the Federal Register of the
portions of the direct final rule on which adverse comment was
received. We will address all public comments in any subsequent final
rule based on this proposed rule. We will not institute a second
comment period on this action. Any parties interested in commenting
must do so at this time. For further information about commenting on
this rule see the ADDRESSES section of this document.
    The proposed changes to the regulatory text are identical to those
presented in the direct final rule published in the ``Rules and
Regulations'' section of today's Federal Register. For further
information, including a detailed explanation and rationale for the
proposal and the text of the proposed regulatory revisions, see the
direct final rule published in the ``Rules and Regulations'' section of
today's Federal Register.

Does this action apply to me?

    Entities potentially affected by this proposed rule are those
involved with the production, distribution, and sale of transportation
fuels, including gasoline and diesel fuel or renewable fuels such as
ethanol and biodiesel. Potentially regulated categories include:

----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
                                                 NAICS \1\     SIC \2\       Examples of potentially regulated
                   Category                        codes        codes                    entities
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Industry......................................       324110         2911  Petroleum refineries.
Industry......................................       325193         2869  Ethyl alcohol manufacturing.
Industry......................................       325199         2869  Other basic organic chemical
                                                                           manufacturing.
Industry......................................       424690         5169  Chemical and allied products merchant
                                                                           wholesalers.
Industry......................................       424710         5171  Petroleum bulk stations and terminals.
Industry......................................       424720         5172  Petroleum and petroleum products
                                                                           merchant wholesalers.

Industry......................................       454319         5989  Other fuel dealers.
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
\1\ North American Industry Classification System (NAICS).
\2\ Standard Industrial Classification (SIC) system code.

    This table is not intended to be exhaustive, but rather provides a
guide for readers regarding entities likely to be regulated by this
proposed action. This table lists the types of entities that EPA is now
aware could potentially be regulated by this proposed action. Other
types of entities not listed in the table could also be regulated. To
determine whether your activities would be regulated by this action,
you should carefully examine the applicability criteria in 40 CFR part
80. If you have any questions regarding the applicability of this
proposed action to a particular entity, consult the person listed in
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT.

Outline of This Preamble

I. Executive Summary
II. Clarifications Related to CWC Price Calculation
III. CWC Price Calculations for 2014 and 2015
IV. Reinsertion of Inadvertently Overwritten Language
V. What Should I Consider as I Prepare My Comments for EPA?
VI. Statutory and Executive Order Reviews
    A. Executive Order 12866: Regulatory Planning and Review and
Executive Order 13563: Improving Regulation and Regulatory Review
    B. Paperwork Reduction Act
    C. Regulatory Flexibility Act
    D. Unfunded Mandates Reform Act
    E. Executive Order 13132: Federalism
    F. Executive Order 13175: Consultation and Coordination With
Indian Tribal Governments.
    G. Executive Order 13045: Protection of Children From
Environmental Health Risks and Safety Risks
    H. Executive Order 13211: Actions Concerning Regulations That
Significantly Affect Energy Supply, Distribution, or Use
    I. National Technology Transfer and Advancement Act
    J. Executive Order 12898: Federal Actions To Address
Environmental Justice in Minority Populations and Low-Income
Populations
VII. Statutory Authority

I. Executive Summary

    For any calendar year for which the projected volume of cellulosic
biofuel production is less than the applicable volume of cellulosic
biofuel set forth in CAA 211(o)(2)(B)(III), EPA must reduce the
required volume of cellulosic biofuel for that year to the projected
volume, and must provide obligated parties the opportunity to purchase
cellulosic waiver credits (CWC). The price of these credits is
determined using a formula specified in the CAA.\1\ The cellulosic
waiver credit price is the greater of $0.25 or $3.00 minus the
wholesale price of gasoline, where both the $0.25 and $3.00 are
adjusted for inflation. In this action we are proposing to clarify the
data sources we use to calculate the inflation adjustments used in this
formula. This would eliminate potential uncertainty regarding EPA's
approach to establishing the CWC prices. We are not making any
modifications to the formula used to calculate the CWC price.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \1\ CAA 211(o)(7)(D)(ii).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    Additionally, in order to provide more certainty to the market
through timely publication of CWC prices, EPA is also amending the
procedure it uses to announce CWC prices. To date, we have established
the prices by rulemaking and published them in the Code of Federal
Regulations. To allow more expeditious publication of these prices, EPA
is proposing to remove references to CWC prices from the CFR. The
prices would instead be posted by the Office of Transportation and Air
Quality within the Office of Air and Radiation on EPA's ``Renewable
Fuels: Regulations & Standards'' Web site (http://www.epa.gov/otaq/fuels/renewablefuels/regulations.htm).
    We are also proposing minor amendments to the regulations to
reinsert language applicable to biofuel producers using Arundo donax or
Pennisetum purpureum as feedstock, which was inadvertently overwritten
by the Quality Assurance Program (QAP) final rule (79 FR 42078, July
18, 2014), and to make minor conforming changes to the numbering of
other regulatory provisions.

II. Clarifications Related to CWC Price Calculation

    EPA is proposing to clarify sections of the regulations related to
the CWC price calculation. These proposed changes are consistent with
the CWC price formula set forth in the statute, and more specifically,
with the statutory direction to adjust certain terms in the formula for
inflation. We believe these proposed regulations would more clearly
articulate the data sources that EPA uses in calculating the CWC price
for each year.
    The regulations that outline the process used by EPA to calculate
the CWC price are set forth in 40 CFR 80.1456(d). The regulations
currently state that ``the wholesale price of gasoline used in the CWC
calculation will be calculated by averaging the most recent twelve
monthly values for U.S. Total Gasoline Bulk Sales (Price) by Refiners
as provided by the Energy Information Administration (EIA) that are
available as of September 30 of the year preceding the compliance
period.'' \2\ In practice, given the publication schedule for the
referenced EIA publication, this means that EPA calculates the
wholesale price of gasoline using data from the 12 months prior to July
of the year preceding the compliance period (i.e., July 2011-June 2012
data for the 2013 CWC price). We are not proposing to make any
modifications to this portion of the regulations.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \2\ 40 CFR 80.1456(d)(2).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    The regulations also currently state that the inflation adjustment
used in calculating the CWC price will be calculated at the time EPA
sets the cellulosic biofuel standard.\3\ In an effort to provide
certainty to the market in relation to the CWC price as soon as
reasonably practical, EPA believes it would be preferable to announce
the CWC price as soon as the relevant data on the wholesale price of
gasoline is available. Therefore, we are proposing to calculate the
inflation adjustment using data from June of the year preceding the
compliance period. We believe this is appropriate as it is the most
recent month within the time period over which we calculate the average
wholesale price of gasoline. We are also proposing to eliminate the
regulatory references to CWC prices. Instead we intend to announce the
CWC price in a notice on our ``Renewable Fuels: Regulations &
Standards'' Web site by November of the year preceding the compliance
period. Consistent with previous CWC calculations, EPA would continue
to base the inflation adjustment on the Consumer Price Index for All
Urban Consumers (CPI-U): U.S. City Average, Unadjusted Index for

All Items expenditure category as provided by the Bureau of Labor and
Statistics. We are proposing to amend our regulations in this action to
clarify that we are using the unadjusted price index, rather than the
seasonally adjusted price index, to calculate the inflation adjustment.
We believe this is appropriate as the unadjusted index most accurately
reflects the prices consumers actually pay and do not change, whereas
the seasonally adjusted indexes are subject to revision for up to five
years after their release.\4\ We are also clarifying that we are using
``US City Average'' data, as opposed to data for geographic subsets of
the country. This is appropriate in light of the nation-wide
applicability of the RFS program. Both of these changes simply clarify
EPA's current practice, and are designed to promote regulatory
certainty and understanding by stakeholders.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \3\ 40 CFR 80.1456(d)(3).
    \4\ For more information on Seasonally Adjusted vs. Unadjusted
Indexes see http://www.bls.gov/cpi/cpisapage.htm.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    We are also proposing to amend the section of our regulations where
the CWC price for previous years is listed.\5\ EPA has included the
prices for 2010, 2011, 2012, and 2013 CWCs in our regulations.
Promulgating prices in regulations, however, requires EPA to undertake
a rulemaking, which we believe may unnecessarily delay the announcement
of the CWC price. Furthermore, we believe the CWC price need not be
established by rulemaking, for the following reasons. First, the
formula and all data sources for the CWC price are specified in our
regulations, so the actual price calculation is a procedural action
that will not benefit from a notice and comment rulemaking. Second,
CWCs are purchased from EPA, and EPA can ensure that the correct price
is paid for them. Finally, the publication of the CWC price in the CFR
is not necessary for informational purposes as EPA intends to promptly
post the CWC prices on our Web site.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \5\ 40 CFR 80.1405(d).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    Therefore, in this action EPA is proposing to delete the sections
of our regulations containing the CWC prices for previous years and is
instead including a statement in the regulations indicating that the
CWC price for each year will be posted on EPA's ``Renewable Fuels:
Regulations & Standards'' Web site (http://www.epa.gov/otaq/fuels/renewablefuels/regulations.htm). Adopting this approach would allow EPA
to announce the CWC prices at the earliest opportunity. We believe this
would benefit both cellulosic biofuel producers and obligated parties.
EPA would post the CWC prices for 2013, 2014, and 2015 on our Web site
following the effective date of this rule.

III. CWC Price Calculations for 2014 and 2015

    To illustrate the derivation of CWC prices pursuant to the
statutory formula, and with the data sources specified in this proposed
rule, we explain in this section the derivation of CWC prices for 2014
and 2015.\6\ EPA determined the average wholesale (refinery gate) price
of gasoline using the monthly average prices for the 12 months prior to
July of the year preceding each compliance period. In this calculation
EPA uses the U.S. Total Gasoline Bulk Sales Price by Refiners (Dollars
per Gallon) as reported by the U.S. Energy Information Administration
(EIA). The data are shown below in Table 1 and Table 2 for the
calculations for 2014 and 2015, respectively, and can be found at:
(http://www.eia.gov/dnav/pet/hist/LeafHandler.ashx?n=PET&s=EMA_EPM0_PBR_NUS_DPG&f=M).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \6\ The calculations for the 2013 CWC were explained in a memo
to the docket for our rulemaking establishing the 2013 standards
(EPA-HQ-OAR-2012-0546-0134). The 2013 CWC price was calculated in
accordance with the methodology and data sources described in this
rule, with one minor difference. To calculate the Inflation Factor
the August 2012 Index (230.037) was used rather than the June 2012
Index (229.815). Using the June 2012 Index in place of the August
2012 Index does not change the CWC waiver credit price for 2013 of
$0.42. EPA will therefore confirm the 2013 CWC price in the
announcement on our Web site following the effective date of this
rule.

       Table 1--Wholesale Gasoline Prices for 2014 CWC Calculation
------------------------------------------------------------------------
                                                           Average price
                          Month                                in $
------------------------------------------------------------------------
July 2012...............................................           2.703
August 2012.............................................           2.961
September 2012..........................................           3.133
October 2012............................................           2.922
November 2012...........................................           2.622
December 2012...........................................           2.554
January 2013............................................           2.668
February 2013...........................................           2.892
March 2013..............................................           2.963
April 2013..............................................           2.822
May 2013................................................           2.824
June 2013...............................................           2.817
------------------------------------------------------------------------

       Table 2--Wholesale Gasoline Prices for 2015 CWC Calculation
------------------------------------------------------------------------
                                                           Average price
                          Month                                in $
------------------------------------------------------------------------
July 2013...............................................           2.879
August 2013.............................................           2.916
September 2013..........................................           2.831
October 2013............................................           2.610
November 2013...........................................           2.496
December 2013...........................................           2.551
January 2014............................................           2.598
February 2014...........................................           2.650
March 2014..............................................           2.763
April 2014..............................................           2.829
May 2014................................................           2.853
June 2014...............................................           2.924
------------------------------------------------------------------------

    The average monthly price in dollars for the calculation of the
2014 CWC price is 2.823. The average monthly price in dollars for the
calculation of the 2015 CWC price is 2.742.
    The CAA requires that EPA adjust for inflation the comparison
values of twenty-five cents ($0.25) and three dollars ($3.00) in the
CWC price formula. EPA must compare the inflated twenty-five cent value
with the amount the inflated three dollar value exceeds the average
wholesale price of gasoline. EPA is required to use the greater of the
two values as the price for the cellulosic biofuel waiver credits.
    EPA evaluated inflation by using the Unadjusted Index values from
the Consumer Price Index for All Urban Consumers (CPI-U): U.S. City
Average, for the All Items expenditure category as provided by the
Bureau of Labor and Statistics, for the months of January 2009 (the
first comparable value after 2008) and June 2013 and June 2014, as
discussed in Section II of this preamble. These unadjusted indexes are
used to calculate an Inflation Factor for each year, as shown in Table
4 below. Finally, we compare $0.25 (inflation adjusted) to $3.00
(inflation adjusted) minus the wholesale price of gasoline for each
year. The greater of these values is the price for the cellulosic
waiver credits.

                     Table 3--Inflation Adjustments
------------------------------------------------------------------------
                                    Unadjusted
              Month                   index              Source
------------------------------------------------------------------------
January 2009.....................      211.143  http://www.bls.gov/cpi/cpid0901.pdf (Table 1).
June 2013........................      233.504  http://www.bls.gov/cpi/cpid1306.pdf (Table 1).
June 2014........................      238.343  http://www.bls.gov/cpi/cpid1406.pdf (Table 1).
------------------------------------------------------------------------

                       Table 4--Inflation Factors
------------------------------------------------------------------------
            Months                     Equation         Inflation factor
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Jan. 2009-June 2013...........  1+(233.504-211.143)/               1.106
                                 211.143.
Jan. 2009-June 2014...........  1+(238.343-211.143)/               1.129
                                 211.143.
------------------------------------------------------------------------

                              Table 5--Cellulosic Waiver Credit Price Calculations
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
                                                                                CWC price (Larger
                                                                    $3--Wholesale price of         of the two
                 Year                      $0.25 (Inflation          gasoline  (Inflation       values, rounded
                                               adjusted)                   adjusted)             to the nearest
                                                                                cent)
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
2014.................................  $0.25*1.106 = $0.28.....  ($3.00*1.106)-$2.823 =                    $0.49
                                                                  $0.4947.
2015.................................  $0.25*1.129 = $0.28.....  ($3.00*1.129)-$2.742 =                    $0.64
                                                                  $0.6445.
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

    As shown in Table 5, using the data sources for the inflation
adjustment that are specified in this proposed rule results in a CWC
price of $0.49 for 2014 and $0.64 for 2015. These prices, along with
the CWC price for 2013 ($0.42) would be posted on EPA's Web site after
the effective date of a final rule.
    EPA notes that in this action we are not making a determination
regarding whether CWCs will actually be offered. As required by
statute, CWCs are only made available for sale if EPA lowers the
required cellulosic biofuel volume requirement below the applicable
volume set forth in the Act. EPA will decide whether or not it will
lower the required cellulosic biofuel volumes in future rules
establishing the 2014 and 2015 cellulosic biofuel percentage standards.
At that time EPA will determine if CWCs will be sold. If so, they will
be sold at the prices indicated above. However EPA notes that it has
offered CWCs for every year since 2010, the first year for which a
separate cellulosic biofuel standard was established. Given the
anticipated shortfall in cellulosic biofuel production, as compared to
statutory volumes, in these years it is probable that CWCs will be
offered.

IV. Reinsertion of Inadvertently Overwritten Language

    In the RFS RIN Quality Assurance Program final rule (79 FR 42078,
July 18, 2014), we moved the previous 40 CFR 80.1426(f)(12) (regarding
process heat produced from biogas) to 40 CFR 80.1426(f)(14) as we had
proposed on February 21, 2013 (78 FR 12158). When we moved 40 CFR
80.1426(f)(12) to 40 CFR 80.1426(f)(14), however, we inadvertently
overwrote the previous 40 CFR 80.1426(f)(14) (regarding renewable fuel
produced from giant reed (Arundo donax) or napier grass (Pennisetum
purpureum)) that had been finalized in a separate final rule which was
published on July 11, 2013 (78 FR 41703). The new 40 CFR 80.1426(f)(12)
finalized in the RFS RIN Quality Assurance Program final rule dealt
with additional requirements for producers and importers when
generating RINs. In today's action, we are proposing to amend the
regulations to undo our inadvertent elimination of the regulatory
provisions related to giant reed and napier grass. Specifically, we are
proposing: (1) re-inserting the inadvertently eliminated language as 40
CFR 80.1426(f)(14) (see 78 FR 41714, July 11, 2013); (2) moving the
current 40 CFR 80.1426(f)(14) (process heat produced from biogas) back
to 40 CFR 80.1426(f)(12), where it existed prior to the RFS RIN Quality
Assurance Program final rule (see 75 FR 79977, December 21, 2010); and
(3) moving the current 40 CFR 80.1426(f)(12) to a new 40 CFR
80.1426(f)(17).

V. What should I consider as I prepare my comments for EPA?

A. Submitting CBI

    Do not submit confidential business information (CBI) to EPA
through www.regulations.gov or email. Clearly mark the part or all of
the information that you claim to be CBI. For CBI information in a disk
or CD-ROM that you mail to EPA, mark the outside of the disk or CD-ROM
as CBI and then identify electronically within the disk or CD-ROM the
specific information that is claimed as CBI. In addition to one
complete version of the comment that includes information claimed as
CBI, a copy of the comment that does not contain the information
claimed as CBI must be submitted for inclusion in the public docket.
Information so marked will not be disclosed except in accordance with
procedures set forth in 40 CFR part 2.

B. Tips for Preparing Your Comments

    When submitting comments, remember to:
     Identify the rulemaking by docket number and other
identifying information (subject heading, Federal Register date and
page number).
     Follow directions--The agency may ask you to respond to
specific questions or organize comments by referencing a Code of
Federal Regulations (CFR) part or section number.
     Explain why you agree or disagree, suggest alternatives,
and substitute language for your requested changes.
     Describe any assumptions and provide any technical
information and/or data that you used.
     If you estimate potential costs or burdens, explain how
you arrived at your estimate in sufficient detail to allow for it to be
reproduced.
     Provide specific examples to illustrate your concerns, and
suggest alternatives.
     Explain your views as clearly as possible, avoiding the
use of profanity or personal threats.

     Make sure to submit your comments by the comment period
deadline identified.

C. Docket Copying Costs

    You may be charged a reasonable fee for photocopying docket
materials, as provided in 40 CFR part 2.

VI. Statutory and Executive Order Reviews

A. Executive Order 12866: Regulatory Planning and Review and Executive
Order 13563: Improving Regulation and Regulatory Review

    This action is not a significant regulatory action and was
therefore not submitted to the Office of Management and Budget (OMB)
for review.

B. Paperwork Reduction Act

    This action does not impose an information collection burden under
the PRA. The changes made to the regulations as a result of this action
impose no new or different reporting requirements on regulated parties.

C. Regulatory Flexibility Act

    I certify that this action will not have a significant economic
impact on a substantial number of small entities under the RFA. In
making this determination, the impact of concern is any significant
adverse economic impact on small entities. An agency may certify that a
rule will not have a significant economic impact on a substantial
number of small entities if the rule relieves regulatory burden, has no
net burden or otherwise has a positive economic effect on the small
entities subject to the rule. This action clarifies the data sources
and methodology used by EPA to establish the CWC price, establishes
these prices for 2014 and 2015, and reinserts inadvertently overwritten
regulatory language. The impacts of the RFS2 program on small entities
were already addressed in the RFS2 final rule promulgated on March 26,
2010 (75 FR 14670), and this rule will not impose any additional
requirements on small entities beyond those already analyzed. We have
therefore concluded that this action will have no net regulatory burden
for all directly regulated small entities.

D. Unfunded Mandates Reform Act

    This action does not contain any unfunded mandate as described in
UMRA, 2 U.S.C. 1531-1538, and does not significantly or uniquely affect
small governments. This action implements mandate(s) specifically and
explicitly set forth in Clean Air Act section 211(o) without the
exercise of any policy discretion by the EPA.

E. Executive Order 13132: Federalism

    This action does not have federalism implications. It will not have
substantial direct effects on the states, on the relationship between
the national government and the states, or on the distribution of power
and responsibilities among the various levels of government.

F. Executive Order 13175: Consultation and Coordination With Indian
Tribal Governments

    This action does not have tribal implications, as specified in
Executive Order 13175. This rule will be implemented at the Federal
level and potentially impacts gasoline, diesel, and renewable fuel
producers, importers, distributors, and marketers. Tribal governments
would be affected only to the extent they purchase and use regulated
fuels. Thus, Executive Order 13175 does not apply to this action.

G. Executive Order 13045: Protection of Children From Environmental
Health Risks and Safety Risks

    The EPA interprets EO 13045 as applying only to those regulatory
actions that concern environmental health or safety risks that the EPA
has reason to believe may disproportionately affect children, per the
definition of ``covered regulatory action'' in section 2-202 of the
Executive Order. This action is not subject to Executive Order 13045
because it does not establish an environmental standard intended to
mitigate health or safety risks and because it implements specific
standards established by Congress in statutes (section 211(o) of the
Clean Air Act).

H. Executive Order 13211: Actions Concerning Regulations That
Significantly Affect Energy Supply, Distribution, or Use

    This action is not subject to Executive Order 13211 because it is
not a significant regulatory action under Executive Order 12866.

I. National Technology Transfer and Advancement Act

    This rulemaking does not involve technical standards.

J. Executive Order 12898: Federal Actions To Address Environmental
Justice in Minority Populations and Low-Income Populations

    This proposed rule is a technical correction and does not concern
an environmental health or safety risk. Therefore, Executive Order
12898 does not apply.

VII. Statutory Authority

    Statutory authority for this proposed action comes from section 211
of the Clean Air Act, 42 U.S.C. 7545.

List of Subjects in 40 CFR Part 80

    Environmental protection, Administrative practice and procedure,
Air pollution control, Diesel fuel, Fuel additives, Gasoline, Imports,
Oil imports, Petroleum, Renewable fuel.

    Dated: March 24, 2015.
Gina McCarthy,
Administrator.
[FR Doc. 2015-07478 Filed 4-2-15; 8:45 am]
 BILLING CODE 6560-50-P


[Federal Register Volume 86, Number 106 (Friday, June 4, 2021)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Pages 29946-29948]
[FR Doc No: 2021-11651]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION

Federal Aviation Administration

14 CFR Part 71

[Docket No. FAA-2020-0642; Airspace Docket No. 19-AWP-98]
RIN 2120-AA66

Amendment of V-25, V-27, V-494, V-108, V-301, and T-257 in the
Vicinity of Santa Rosa, CA

AGENCY: Federal Aviation Administration (FAA), DOT.

ACTION: Final rule.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: This action amends VHF Omnidirectional Range (VOR) Federal
airways V-25, V-27, V-494, V-108, V-301, and United States Area
Navigation route (RNAV) T-257 in the vicinity of Santa Rosa, CA. The
amendments are due to the planned decommissioning of the Santa Rosa, CA
VOR/Distance Measuring Equipment (DME) navigation aid (NAVAID) which
provides navigation guidance for portions of the affected airways. The
Santa Rosa VOR/DME is being decommissioned as part of the FAA's VOR
Minimum Operational Network (MON) program.

DATES: Effective date 0901 UTC, August 12, 2021. The Director of the
Federal Register approves this incorporation by reference action under
1 CFR part 51, subject to the annual revision of FAA Order 7400.11 and
publication of conforming amendments.

ADDRESSES: FAA Order 7400.11E, Airspace Designations and Reporting
Points, and subsequent amendments can be viewed online at https://www.faa.gov/air_traffic/publications/. For further information, you can
contact the Rules and Regulations Group, Federal Aviation
Administration, 800 Independence Avenue SW, Washington, DC 20591;
telephone:<PHONE_NUMBER>. The Order is also available for inspection
at the National Archives and Records Administration (NARA). For
information on the availability of FAA Order 7400.11E at NARA, email:
<EMAIL_ADDRESS>or go to https://www.archives.gov/federal-register/cfr/ibr-locations.html.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Christopher McMullin, Rules and
Regulations Group, Office of Policy, Federal Aviation Administration,
800 Independence Avenue SW, Washington, DC 20591; telephone: (202) 267-
8783.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

Authority for This Rulemaking

    The FAA's authority to issue rules regarding aviation safety is
found in Title 49 of the United States Code. Subtitle I, Section 106
describes the authority of the FAA Administrator. Subtitle VII,
Aviation Programs, describes in more detail the scope of the agency's
authority. This rulemaking is promulgated under the authority described
in Subtitle VII, Part A, Subpart I, Section 40103. Under that section,
the FAA is charged with prescribing regulations to assign the use of
the airspace necessary to ensure the safety of aircraft and the
efficient use of airspace. This regulation is within the scope of that
authority as it would modify the route structure as necessary to
preserve the safe and efficient flow of air traffic within the National
Airspace System.

History

    The FAA published a notice of proposed rulemaking for Docket No.
FAA-2020-0642 in the Federal Register (85 FR 47928; August 7, 2020),
amending VOR Federal airways V-25, V-27, V-494, V-108, V-301, and RNAV
route T-257 in the vicinity of Santa Rosa, CA, due to the planned
decommissioning of the Santa Rosa, CA, VOR/DME NAVAID. Interested
parties were invited to participate in this rulemaking effort by
submitting written comments on the proposal. No comments were received.
    VOR Federal airways are published in paragraph 6010(a) and United
States Area Navigation Routes are published in paragraph 6011 of FAA
Order 7400.11E dated July 21, 2020, and effective September 15, 2020,
which is incorporated by reference in 14 CFR 71.1. The VOR Federal
airways and United States Area Navigation Route listed in this document
will be subsequently published in the Order.

Availability and Summary of Documents for Incorporation by Reference

    This document amends FAA Order 7400.11E, Airspace Designations and
Reporting Points, dated July 21, 2020, and effective September 15,
2020. FAA Order 7400.11E is publicly available as listed in the
ADDRESSES section of this document. FAA Order 7400.11E lists Class A,
B, C, D, and E airspace areas, air traffic service routes, and
reporting points.

The Rule

    The FAA is amending 14 CFR part 71 by amending VOR Federal airways
V-25, V-27, V-494, V-108, V-301, and RNAV route T-257. The planned
decommissioning of the Santa Rosa, CA, VOR/DME has made this action
necessary. The VOR Federal airway and United States Area Navigation
route actions are described below.
    V-25: V-25 extends between Mission Bay, CA and Wenatchee, WA. The
FAA will amend V-25 to reflect the new description of the GETER
intersection. The GETER intersection will be redefined amending the
position on radials from Point Reyes and Mendocino VORs. The unaffected
portions of the existing airway will remain as charted.
    V-27: V-27 extends between Mission Bay, CA and Seattle, WA. The FAA
will amend the description of the GETER intersection to reflect new
position on radials from the Point Reyes, CA, VOR/DME and the
Mendocino, CA, VOR. The unaffected portions of the existing airway will
remain as charted.
    V-494: V-494 extends from Crescent City, CA to Hazen, NV. The FAA
will amend the legal description by removing the reference to the Santa
Rosa, CA, VOR/DME and establishing an intersection (ROZZA) utilizing
radials from Point Reyes, CA, VOR/DME and the Scaggs Island, CA, VOR
Collocated Tactical Air Navigation System (VORTAC). The unaffected
portion of the existing airway will remain as charted.
    V-108: V-108 extends from Santa Rosa, CA to Hill City, KS. The FAA
will amend the route removing references to the Santa Rosa, CA, VOR/DME
and referring to the newly established ROZZA intersection utilizing
radials from the Point Reyes, CA, VOR/DME and the Scaggs Island, CA,
VORTAC. The unaffected portion of the existing airway will remain as
charted.
    V-301: V-301 extends from Panoche, CA to Williams, CA. The FAA will
amend the route, removing references to the Santa Rosa, CA, VOR/DME and
referring to the newly established ROZZA intersection utilizing radials
from the Point Reyes, CA, VOR/DME and the Scaggs Island, CA, VORTAC.
The unaffected portion of the existing airway will remain as charted.
    T-257: T-257 extends from Ventura, CA to Tatoosh, WA. The FAA will
amend the route to reflect the amended location of FREES due to the
relocation on GETER. The unaffected portion of the existing airway will
remain as charted.
    FAA Order 7400.11, Airspace Designations and Reporting Points, is
published yearly and effective on September 15.

Regulatory Notices and Analyses

    The FAA has determined that this regulation only involves an
established body of technical regulations for which frequent and
routine amendments are necessary to keep them operationally current.
It, therefore: (1) Is not a ``significant regulatory action'' under
Executive Order 12866; (2) is not a ``significant rule'' under
Department of Transportation (DOT) Regulatory Policies and Procedures
(44 FR 11034; February 26, 1979); and (3) does not warrant preparation
of a regulatory evaluation as the anticipated impact is so minimal.
Since this is a routine matter that only affects air traffic procedures
and air navigation, it is certified that this rule, when promulgated,
does not have a significant economic impact on a substantial number of
small entities under the criteria of the Regulatory Flexibility Act.

Environmental Review

    The FAA has determined that this action of amending VOR Federal
airways V-25, V-27, V-494, V-108, V-301, and RNAV route T-257, due to
the planned decommissioning of the of the Santa Rosa, CA VOR/DME
NAVAID, qualifies for categorical exclusion under the National
Environmental Policy Act (42 U.S.C. 4321 et seq.) and its implementing
regulations at 40 CFR part 1500, and in accordance with FAA Order
1050.1F, Environmental Impacts: Policies and Procedures, paragraph 5-
6.5a, which categorically excludes from further environmental impact
review rulemaking actions that designate or modify classes of airspace
areas, airways, routes, and reporting points (see 14 CFR part 71,
Designation of Class A, B, C, D, and E Airspace Areas; Air Traffic
Service Routes; and Reporting Points). As such, this action is not
expected to result in any potentially significant environmental
impacts. In accordance with FAA Order 1050.1F, paragraph 5-2 regarding
Extraordinary Circumstances, the FAA has reviewed this action for
factors and circumstances in which a normally categorically excluded
action may have a significant environmental impact requiring further
analysis. The FAA has determined that no extraordinary circumstances
exist that warrant preparation of an environmental assessment or
environmental impact study.

List of Subjects in 14 CFR Part 71

    Airspace, Incorporation by reference, Navigation (air).

Adoption of the Amendment

    In consideration of the foregoing, the Federal Aviation
Administration amends 14 CFR part 71 as follows:

PART 71--DESIGNATION OF CLASS A, B, C, D, AND E AIRSPACE AREAS; AIR
TRAFFIC SERVICE ROUTES; AND REPORTING POINTS

0
1. The authority citation for part 71 continues to read as follows:

    Authority:  49 U.S.C. 106(f), 106(g); 40103, 40113, 40120; E.O.
10854, 24 FR 9565, 3 CFR, 1959-1963 Comp., p. 389.

Sec.  71.1   [Amended]

0
2. The incorporation by reference in 14 CFR 71.1 of FAA Order 7400.11E,
Airspace Designations and Reporting Points, dated July 21, 2020, and
effective September 15, 2020, is amended as follows:

Paragraph 6010(a) Domestic VOR Federal Airways.

* * * * *

V-25 [Amended]

    From Mission Bay, CA, via Los Angeles, CA; INT Los Angeles
261[deg] and Ventura, CA, 144[deg] radials; 6 miles wide, Ventura;
San Marcus, CA; Paso Robles, CA; Salinas, CA; INT Salinas 310[deg]
and Woodside, CA, 158[deg] radials; Woodside; San Francisco, CA; INT
San Francisco 304[deg] and Point Reyes, CA, 161[deg] radials; Point
Reyes; INT Point Reyes 352[deg] and Mendocino, CA, 146[deg] radials;
28 miles, 24 miles, 85 MSL, 18 miles, 75 MSL, Red Bluff, CA; 53
miles, 95 MSL, INT Red Bluff 015[deg] and Klamath Falls, OR,
181[deg] radials; 19 miles, 95 MSL, Klamath Falls; 21 miles, 77
miles, 90 MSL, Deschutes, OR; Klickitat, WA; Yakima, WA; Ellensburg,
WA; Wenatchee, WA. The airspace below 2,000 feet MSL outside the
United States and the airspace more than 3 miles NE of the airway
centerline between Seal Beach and INT of Seal Beach 287[deg] and Los
Angeles 138[deg] radials is excluded. The airspace within R-2511 and
W-289 is excluded. The airspace within R-2519 more than 3 statute
miles west of the airway centerline, and the airspace within R-2519
below 5,000 feet MSL is excluded. The portion outside the United
States has no upper limit.
* * * * *

V-27 [Amended]

    From Mission Bay, CA, INT Mission Bay 319[deg] and Santa
Catalina, CA, 099[deg] radials; Santa Catalina; 6 miles wide,
Ventura, CA; INT Ventura 326[deg] and Fillmore, CA, 265[deg]
radials; INT Fillmore 265[deg] and Gaviota, CA, 143[deg] radials;
Gaviota; Morro Bay, CA; INT Morro Bay 308[deg] and Big Sur, CA,
157[deg] radials; Big Sur; INT Big Sur 325[deg] and Point Reyes, CA,
161[deg] radials; Point Reyes; INT Point Reyes 352[deg] and
Mendocino, CA, 146[deg] radials; Mendocino; Fortuna, CA; Crescent
City, CA; 31 miles, 32 miles, 59 MSL, North Bend, OR; Newport, OR;
39 miles, 30 miles, 45 MSL, Astoria, OR; Hoquiam, WA; Seattle, WA.
The airspace below 2,000 feet MSL

outside the United States between San Diego and Santa Catalina, the
airspace within R-2516 and W-289, the airspace within R-2519 more
than 3 statute miles west of the airway centerline, and the airspace
within R-2519 below 5,000 feet MSL, is excluded. The portion outside
the United States has no upper limit.
* * * * *

V-494 [Amended]

    From Crescent City, CA, via INT Crescent City 195[deg] and
Fortuna, CA, 345[deg] radials; Fortuna; INT Fortuna 170[deg] and
Mendocino, CA 321[deg] radials; INT Point Reyes, CA 006[deg] and
Scaggs Island, CA 314[deg] radials; Sacramento, CA; INT Sacramento
038[deg] and Squaw Valley, CA, 249[deg] radials; Squaw Valley; INT
Squaw Valley 078[deg] and Hazen, NV, 244[deg] radials; Hazen.
* * * * *

V-108 [Amended]

    From INT Point Reyes 006[deg] and Scaggs Island 314[deg]
radials, via Scaggs Island, CA; INT Scaggs Island 131[deg] and
Concord, CA, 276[deg] radials; 7 miles wide (4 miles N and 3 miles S
of centerline), Concord; Linden, CA. From Meeker, CO; via Red Table,
CO; Black Forest, CO; Hugo, CO; 74 miles, 65 MSL, Goodland, KS; Hill
City, KS.
* * * * *

V-301 [Amended]

    From Panoche, CA; via INT Panoche 317[deg] and Oakland, CA,
110[deg] radials; Oakland; Point Reyes, CA; INT Point Reyes 006[deg]
and Scaggs Island 314[deg]; Williams, CA.
* * * * *

Paragraph 6011 United States Area Navigation Routes

* * * * *

T-257 Ventura, CA (VTU) to Tatoosh, WA (TOU) [Amended]

Ventura, CA (VTU) VOR/DME (lat. 34[deg]06'54.21'' N, long.
119[deg]02'58.17'' W)
San Marcus, CA (RZS) VORTAC (lat. 34[deg]30'34.32'' N, long.
119[deg]46'15.57'' W)
Morro Bay, CA (MQO) VORTAC (lat. 35[deg]15'08.12'' N, long.
120[deg]45'34.44'' W)
BLANC, CA FIX (lat. 35[deg]37'53.19'' N, long. 121[deg]21'23.04'' W)
CAATE, CA WP (lat. 36[deg]46'32.29'' N, long. 122[deg]04'09.57'' W)
CHAWZ, CA WP (lat. 37[deg]06'48.59'' N, long. 122[deg]21'09.58'' W)
PORTE, CA FIX (lat. 37[deg]29'23.23'' N, long. 122[deg]28'28.48'' W)
THHEO, CA WP (lat. 37[deg]44'54.55'' N, long. 122[deg]36'54.79'' W)
JAMIN, CA WP (lat. 37[deg]51'16.99'' N, long. 122[deg]40'12.05'' W)
Point Reyes, CA (PYE) VORTAC (lat. 38[deg]04'47.12'' N, long.
122[deg]52'04.18'' W)
FREES, CA FIX (lat. 38[deg]23'13.59'' N, long. 122[deg]55'20.56'' W)
NACKI, CA WP (lat. 38[deg]43'47.73'' N, long. 123[deg]05'52.93'' W)
Mendocino, CA (ENI) VORTAC (lat. 39[deg]03'11.58'' N, long.
123[deg]16'27.58'' W)
FLUEN, CA FIX (lat. 39[deg]32'47.92'' N, long. 123[deg]33'42.75'' W)
PLYAT, CA FIX (lat. 40[deg]20'20.90'' N, long. 123[deg]41'35.88'' W)
CCHUK, CA WP (lat. 40[deg]31'42.18''N., long. 124[deg]04'16.08'' W.)
SCUPY, CA WP (lat. 40[deg]55'23.94'' N., long. 124[deg]18'09.85''
W.)
OLJEK, CA FIX (lat. 41[deg]28'30.66'' N, long. 124[deg]14'20.68'' W)
CIGCA, CA WP (lat. 41[deg]36'39.60'' N, long. 124[deg]17'27.58'' W)
FURNS, CA WP (lat. 41[deg]55'15.86'' N, long. 124[deg]26'09.40'' W)
MITUE, OR FIX (lat. 43[deg]18'49.00'' N, long. 124[deg]30'22.74'' W)
JANAS, OR FIX (lat. 44[deg]17'33.63'' N, long. 124[deg]05'14.25'' W)
Newport, OR (ONP) VORTAC (lat. 44[deg]34'31.26'' N, long.
124[deg]03'38.14'' W)
CUTEL, OR FIX (lat. 44[deg]54'27.50'' N, long. 124[deg]01'25.30'' W)
ILWAC, WA FIX (lat. 46[deg]19'46.62'' N, long. 124[deg]10'49.49'' W)
ZEDAT, WA FIX (lat. 46[deg]35'50.64'' N, long. 124[deg]10'01.14'' W)
WAVLU, WA FIX (lat. 46[deg]50'00.90'' N, long. 124[deg]06'35.70'' W)
Hoquiam, WA (HQM) VORTAC (lat. 46[deg]56'49.35'' N, long.
124[deg]08'57.37'' W)
COPLS, WA WP (lat. 47[deg]06'46.78'' N, long. 124[deg]07'40.80'' W)
WAPTO, WA FIX (lat. 47[deg]28'19.54'' N, long. 124[deg]13'50.38'' W)
OZETT, WA WP (lat. 48[deg]03'07.00'' N, long. 124[deg]35'54.42'' W)
Tatoosh, WA (TOU) VORTAC (lat. 48[deg]17'59.64'' N, long.
124[deg]37'37.36'' W)
* * * * *

    Issued in Washington, DC, on May 28, 2021.
George Gonzalez,
Acting Manager, Rules and Regulations Group.
[FR Doc. 2021-11651 Filed 6-3-21; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910-13-P