From:	"Cronmiller, Rae E."<EMAIL_ADDRESS>
To:	Lanelle Wiggins/DC/USEPA/US@EPA

Cc:	"Rostker, David J."<EMAIL_ADDRESS>RobertJ
Wayland/RTP/USEPA/US@EPA, <EMAIL_ADDRESS><EMAIL_ADDRESS><EMAIL_ADDRESS><EMAIL_ADDRESS><EMAIL_ADDRESS><EMAIL_ADDRESS><EMAIL_ADDRESS><EMAIL_ADDRESS>mike thatcher
<EMAIL_ADDRESS>"Wehrum, William L."<EMAIL_ADDRESS>" Theresa Pugh"<EMAIL_ADDRESS>
Date:	07/27/2011 03:28 PM

Subject:	FW: NRECA comments to SER panel on Clean Air Act  GHG NSPS and
accompanying graphs referenced in comments

Lanelle, attached are NRECA’s comments on the SER GHG NSPS panel
deliberations.  The excel documents are referenced in our comments in
PDF format.  Regards.

San Miguel 1 - Monthly Operations - 2007 to March 2011 -7.5.2011.xlsx

Marion - Monthly Operations - 2007 - March 2011 - 7.5.2011.xlsx

Fort Dodge - Monthly Operations - 2007 to March 2011 - 7.5.2011.xls

Genoa 3 - Monthly Operations - 2007 - March 2011 - 7.5.2011.xls

Chamois -Monthly Operations  - 2007 - March 2011 - 7.5.2011.xlsx

S2 - Monthly Operations - 2007 - March 2011 - 7.5.2011.xlsx

NRECA GHG NSPS SBREFA comments.pdf


EPA Registration Division contact: Laura Nollen,<PHONE_NUMBER>

Interregional Research Project No. 4 (IR-4)

Pesticide Petition (PP#):  3E8223

EPA has received a pesticide petition (PP# 3E8223) from Interregional
Research Project No. 4

(IR-4), Rutgers, The State University of New Jersey, 500 College Road
East, Suite 201W, Princeton, NJ  08540, proposing, pursuant to section
408(d) of the Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act (FFDCA), 21 U.S.C.
346a(d), to amend 40 CFR §180.523 by establishing a tolerance for
residues of

metaldehyde in or on the follow raw agricultural commodities:  Clover,
forage at 0.5 parts per million (ppm); Clover, hay at 0.5 ppm; Ginseng
at 0.05 ppm; Vegetable legume, edible podded, subgroup 6A at 0.8 ppm;
Pea and bean, succulent shelled, subgroup 6B at 0.2 ppm; Vegetable,
foliage of legume, except soybean, subgroup 7A at 1.5 ppm; Tomato
subgroup 8-10A at 0.24 ppm; Fruit, citrus, group 10-10 at 0.26 ppm.
Clover, forage and clover, hay are proposed as tolerances with regional
registrations.

Upon establishment of the tolerances proposed in “New Tolerances”
the petition additionally requests to amend 40 CFR §180.523 by removing
the established tolerances for residues of

metaldehyde in or on the follow raw agricultural commodities:  fruit,
citrus, group 10 at 0.26 ppm; and tomato at 0.24 ppm.

EPA has determined that the petition contains data or information
regarding the elements set forth in section 408(d)(2) of the FFDCA;
however, EPA has not fully evaluated the sufficiency of the submitted
data at this time or whether the data supports granting of the petition.
 Additional data may be needed before EPA  rules on the petition.

A. Residue Chemistry

1.   Plant metabolism. Previously submitted studies sponsored by Lonza
Inc., established that Metaldehyde can translocate into plants and that
the only residue of concern is parent Metaldehyde. The translocation
studies using 14C-Metaldehyde were conducted in leaf lettuce and sugar
beets (MRID Nos. 43923301 and 43923302).  LSC analysis of the lettuce
from the treated lettuce plot showed that the lettuce contained an
average Total Radioactive Residue (TRR) level (expressed as
14C-Metaldehyde equivalents) of 2.44 ppm from the outer leaves and 2.36
ppm from the inner leaves.  The corresponding values for the beet
foliage and roots were 2.87 and 0.61 ppm, respectively.   HPLC analysis
of treated lettuce and beet samples showed that 100% of the
radioactivity in the lettuce and beet samples consisted of parent
14C-Metaldehyde.

2.   Analytical method.  A GC/MS analytical method has been developed
for analyzing residues of Metaldehyde in food crops including all of the
crops identified above.  The limit of quantitation (LOQ) for the method
is 0.05 ppm.  The method has been validated with respect to specificity
and non-analyte interference, precision (repeatability), accuracy,
sensitivity, linearity of standards, stability of standard solutions and
precision (replicate injections) by EN-CAS Analytical Laboratories Study
No. 99-0055 (MRID# 46010501).

3. Magnitude of residues. Crop field trials were conducted in all the
crops identified in this petition, except for the crops covered by the
revised crop groupings.  A summary of the trials is shown below.  All of
the trials were conducted with the registered end-use product, Deadline
M-P, which contains 4% Metaldehyde.

Summary of Residue Studies Conducted with Metaldehyde

Crop	Number of Trials	Application Rate	Results

Ginseng	4	1 lb. a.i./A per application

6.0 lb. ai./A per season	There were no detectable residues of
Metaldehyde (LLMV =  0.05 ppm) found in any treated or untreated dried
ginseng root samples.

Clover	4	0.798 – 0.838 lb. a.i./A  (per application)

1.598 – 1.661 lbs. a.i./A (per season)	The total residues of
metaldehyde were in the ranges of <0.05 – 0.275 ppm in forage samples
and <0.05 - 0.255 ppm in hay samples.

Bean (Succulent Shelled)	6	0.997 – 1.000 lbs. a.i./A (per application)

2.991 – 3.000 lbs. a.i./A (per season)

	There were no detectable residues of Metaldehyde above the LLMV of 0.05
ppm in 4 of the 6 treated field trials. Remaining 2 field trials,
quantifiable residues were found in the treated samples, with the
maximum residue measured 0.152 ppm.

Bean and Pea (Edible Podded)	7 (bean)

3 (pea)	0.988 – 1.004 lbs. a.i./A ( per application)

2.988 – 3.012 lbs. a.i./A (per season)	Metaldehyde residues were in
the range <0.05-0.432 ppm in edible podded beans and <0.050-0.258 ppm
for edible podded peas, 0.0600-0.668 ppm for bean foliage, and <0.05 –
0.352 ppm for pea foliage.

Pea (Succulent Shelled)	7	0.999 – 1.083 lb. a.i./A (per application)

2.997 – 3.246 lbs. a.i/A (per season)	Metaldehyde residues were in the
range <0.05 – 0.140 ppm

4.  Magnitude of the Residue in Animals.  Metaldehyde is a cyclic
tetramer of acetaldehyde.  Therefore, metabolism in animal systems will
result in the release of acetaldehyde, a normal body constituent.  The
metabolism of acetaldehyde, a normal body constituent and major
degradate of ethanol, is well documented and understood.  On the basis
of this rationale the Agency granted waivers from conducting both nature
and magnitude of the residue studies in animals with Metaldehyde.]

B. Toxicological Profile

1. Acute toxicity.  The acute oral LD50s in rats and mice were
determined to be 283 and 425 mg/kg, respectively.  The acute dermal
LD50 and acute inhalation LC50 in rats were determined to be > 5 g/kg
and > 15 mg/l, respectively (MRID#s 131434 and 131429).  When
instilled into the eye of the rabbit, slight transient iridial and
conjunctival irritation were observed during the first 48 hours after
instillation (MRID# 42068801).  No irritation was observed when
Metaldehyde was applied to the skin of the rabbit (MRID# 131971).  In a
dermal sensitization study conducted in guinea pigs, Metaldehyde was
shown to be nonsensitizing (MRID# 153405).

2. Genotoxicity.  A battery of tests has been conducted including assays
for gene mutation in bacterial cells (MRID#s 131433 and 41553205),
chromosomal aberrations in mammalian cells (MRID# 163832), an in vitro
gene mutation assay in mouse lymphoma L5178Y cells (MRID#s 41553206 and
42044007) an in vivo micronucleus test in the mouse (MRID# 42044006).
Metaldehyde was not active in any of these assays

3. Reproductive and developmental toxicity.  A developmental toxicity
study in rats was conducted at Metaldehyde dose levels of 0, 25, 75 and
150 mg/kg/day (MRID# 41656001).  The doses were administered via oral
gavage on gestational days 6 – 15.  The maternal no-observed effect
level (NOEL) was 75 mg/kg/day and the developmental NOEL was greater
than the highest dose level tested of 150 mg/kg/day.

A developmental toxicity study in New Zealand White rabbits was
conducted at Metaldehyde dose levels of 0, 10, 40 and 80 mg/kg/day
(MRID# 41590501).  There was no impact on gestational parameters, or
external, visceral or skeletal variations or malformations at any of the
dose levels tested.  The maternal and developmental toxicity NOEL was
greater than the highest dose tested (80 mg/kg/day).

A two-generation reproduction study was conducted in rats fed diets
containing 0, 50, 1000 and 2000 ppm of Metaldehyde (MRID# 42823101).
No effects on the reproductive parameters, litter viability or pup
survival were observed during either generation.  The NOEL for adult
toxicity was 50 ppm; the NOEL for offspring was 1000 ppm and the NOEL
for reproductive effects was greater than 2000 ppm.

4. Subchronic toxicity.  A 90-day repeated dose dietary neurotoxicity
study in Sprague-Dawley CD® rats was conducted at Metaldehyde dietary
concentrations of 0, 100, 500 and 2500 ppm (equivalent to 0, 8, 39 and
185 mg/kg/day, respectively) (MRID# 46223401).  With the exception of
one female in the 2500 ppm treatment group that showed loss of hind limb
function, increased respiration, wet fur, and red/brown staining around
the anogenital region, no clinical signs of toxicity were observed in
any of the dose groups.  Females in the 2500 ppm treatment group had
decreased body weight gain during the first week of the study.  No
treatment-related effects were observed in the behavioral, functional or
sensory assessments of neurotoxicity.  The NOEL for neurotoxicity was
considered to be 500 ppm (39 mg/kg/day).

5. Chronic toxicity. A six-month chronic toxicity study was conducted in
Beagle dogs (MRID# 131432). Metaldehyde dose levels of 0, 20, 60 and 90
mg/kg/day were administered via the diet.  No clear evidence of systemic
toxicity was observed in any of the treatment groups.

A 52-week chronic toxicity study in dogs was conducted by administering
Metaldehyde via the diet at concentrations of 0, 10, 30 and 90 mg/kg/day
(MRID# 46378401).  Clinical signs observed in the high-dose group
included ataxia, emesis, salivation, tremor and twitching.  Reduced body
weight gain, changes in hematological and biochemical parameters and in
increased absolute and relative liver weight also were noted for the
animals in this group.  Histopathology revealed morphological changes in
the testes and prostate of the animals treated with 90 mg/kg/day in the
form of an atrophy and/or degeneration of the germinative epithelium
with giant cells.  One mid- and high-dose female and one mid-dose male
died prior to the terminal sacrifice.  The study director attributed all
three deaths to treatment with Metaldehyde and defined the no-observed
adverse effect level (NOAEL) as 10 mg/kg/day on this basis.  Since
there were no other treatment-related effects observed in the 30
mg/kg/day dose group, it is somewhat questionable as to whether or not
the two deaths in the mid dose group should be attributed to
Metaldehyde treatment.

An oncogenicity study was conducted for a period of 78 weeks in Charles
River CD-1® mice (MRID# 42737201).  Metaldehyde dietary concentrations
of 0, 25, 100 and 300 ppm were evaluated (equivalent to 4, 16 and 49
mg/kg/day for the males and 0, 5, 20 and 60 mg/kg/day for the females,
respectively). The only treatment-related effect was hepatocellular
hypertrophy in the 300 ppm dose group.  Pair wise comparisons and/or
life table analyses did not indicate any treatment-related effects on
survival, tumor incidence or time to tumor.

Because the criteria for a maximum tolerated dose was not satisfied in
the initial oncogenicity study, a second 78-week chronic oncogenicity
study was conducted in Charles River CD-1® mice (MRID# 44625101).  In
this study, Metaldehyde dietary concentrations of 0 and 1000 ppm were
evaluated (equivalent to 0 and 135 mg/kg/day for the males and 0 and
163 mg/kg/day for the females).  The exposure of mice to 1000 ppm of
Metaldehyde in the diet did not result in clinical signs of toxicity or
changes in survival, body weight, hematology or toxicologically
significant changes in food consumption.  Treatment-related increases in
liver weight and histopathological lesions in the liver of male mice,
and to a lesser extent, of female mice were observed.  Significant
histopathologic lesions observed in Metaldehyde treated mice included
hepatocellular hypertrophy in male and female mice and single cell
necrosis, focal and multifocal necrosis, pigment accumulation,
sinusoidal histiocytosis and hepatocellular adenoma in male mice. A
small increase in the incidence of hepatocellular eosinophilic cell foci
or hepatocellular adenoma in female mice treated with 1000 ppm
Metaldehyde also was observed.  The nature of these changes was
consistent with an adaptive hypertrophic response of the liver to an
increase in metabolic demand with subsequent development of
proliferative changes and hepatocellular toxicity.  There were no other
treatment-related findings.

A cell proliferation assay (MRID# 44810901) was conducted in order to
further investigate the mechanism by which the increase in benign liver
tumors occurred in the mouse oncogenicity study.  Archival material from
a mouse 90-day dose range-finding study was used for this evaluation.  A
clear dose response for cell proliferation in the liver was observed in
this assay.  These findings support the conclusion that the increased
incidence of benign liver tumors observed in the mouse oncogenicity
study resulted from cell proliferative effects secondary to cytotoxicity
rather than a direct oncogenic effect of Metaldehyde.

A chronic toxicity/oncogenicity study was conducted for a period of
104 weeks in Sprague-Dawley CD® rats (MRID# 42203601).  Metaldehyde
dietary concentrations of 0, 50, 1000 or 5000 ppm (equivalent to 0, 2,
44, and 224 mg/kg/day for the males and 0, 3, 60 and 314 mg/kg/day for
the females) were evaluated.  No biologically significant differences in
mortality, clinical signs of toxicity, palpable masses or food
consumption were observed in any of the treatment groups.  Treatment of
both male and female rats with 5000 ppm Metaldehyde resulted in
decreased body weight and weight gain throughout the test period,
increases in both absolute and relative liver weights, and an a
numerical increase in the incidence of females at necropsy with liver
masses and/or nodules at necropsy.  Increased serum globulin and
increased serum cholesterol for females only, hepatocellular hypertrophy
for males and females, and a questionable increase in the incidence of
females with hepatocellular adenomas were observed in the high-dose
group.  These benign neoplasms occurred late in the course of the study
and were within the range of historical control incidences for the same
tumor.  Therefore, this small numerical increase in hepatocellular
adenomas was attributed to an uncommonly low number of such tumors in
the concurrent control animals.  Treatment-related effects in animals
fed diets containing 1000 ppm Metaldehyde were lower body weight and
body weight gain in the males and females for the first year of the
study, increased serum cholesterol for females only, and hepatocellular
hypertrophy for males and females.  The NOEL for systemic toxicity after
104 weeks of dietary administration to rats was 50 ppm (2.0 mg/kg/day
for males and 3.0 mg/kg/day for females).

Based on the toxicology data base assembled for Metaldehyde, the acute
NOAEL is considered to be 75 mg/kg/day and the acute Reference Dose
(RfD), using a 100x safety factor is 0.75 mg/kg/day.  The chronic NOEL
is considered to be 10 mg/kg/day and the chronic RfD, using a 100x
safety factor, is 0.1 mg/kg/day.

6. Animal metabolism. A study was conducted in Charles River CD® rats
to determine the absorption, distribution, metabolism and excretion
patterns of 14C-Metaldehyde following oral dose administration
(MRID# 42300901).  The results of the study showed that orally
administered Metaldehyde is readily absorbed from the gastrointestinal
tract and quantitatively metabolized to acetaldehyde, which in turn is
converted to acetyl-C0A as it enters the Krebs cycle.  This allowed the
14C label to be eliminated as 14C-C02 and to enter the two carbon pool
resulting in persistent 14C residues in tissue.  The majority of the
Metaldehyde was eliminated as 14C-CO2.

7. Metabolite toxicology. The only residue found in plants was parent
Metaldehyde.  In animal systems, Metaldehyde is metabolized to
acetaldehyde (a normal body constituent) and CO2.  Therefore, only
parent Metaldehyde is included in the proposed tolerance expressions and
in the risk exposure assessment.

8. Endocrine disruption.  No special studies investigating the potential
estrogenic or other endocrine effects of Metaldehyde have been
conducted.  However, the standard battery of required toxicology studies
has been completed.  These include an evaluation of the potential
effects on reproduction and development, and an evaluation of the
pathology of the endocrine organs following repeated or long-term
exposure to doses that far exceed likely human exposures.  Based on
these studies there is no evidence to suggest that Metaldehyde has an
adverse effect on the endocrine system.

C. Aggregate Exposure

1. Dietary exposure. Acute and chronic dietary risk assessments were
conducted for Metaldehyde using the Cumulative and Aggravate Risk
Evaluation System (CARES) and the USDA Continuing Survey of Food Intake
by Individuals (CSFII, for 1987 through 1994). Existing crop tolerances
and the proposed tolerances noted in this document were used.  The
results of both the chronic and acute dietary and clearly demonstrate a
reasonable certainty that no harm will result from the proposed uses of
Metaldehyde.

A.  Acute  Dietary Exposure.

Based on the CARES acute dietary risk assessment, exposure at the 95th
percentile for the overall U.S. population was estimated to be 0.00314
mg/kg/day, which results in a Margin of Exposure (MOE) of 23876, which
is 0.42% of the acute Permissible Acceptable Dose (aPAD). The highest
exposed population subgroup, children 1-2 years, had an acute exposure
at the 95th percentile that was estimated to be 0.00801 mg/kg/day,
which results in an MOE of 9364 and 1.07% of aPAD.

B. Chronic Dietary Exposure.

i. Food:  Based on the CARES chronic dietary risk assessment, the
exposure for the overall U.S. population was estimated to be 0.0010
mg/kg bw/day, which is 1.03% of the cPAD.  The highest exposed subgroup,
children 1-2 years, had a chronic exposure of 0.0027 mg/kg bw/day, which
is 2.67% of the cPAD.

2. Non-dietary exposure. A deterministic non-dietary (non-occupational)
risk assessment using the Residential Exposure Assessment (Rex) model
was performed for Metaldehyde applied to the ground in and around
ornamental plants, small fruit and berry plants, fruit trees, vegetable
garden areas (MRID# 46524302).  The maximum application rate of 3.5 lbs
of active ingredient (a.i.) per acre was used.

A separate assessment for use of Metaldehyde in lawn care applications
was also performed (MRID# 46524304).

The results for the non-dietary (non-occupational) risk assessment
indicate that acceptable MOEs exist for the vegetable garden (and by
inference small fruits and berries), ornamental, and tree care hand
dispersion scenarios.  Using worst-case conditions (e.g., no gloves
during application, maximum application rates, 1,000 square feet being
treated for each setting, i.e., gardens, ornamentals and trees), the
overall aggregate MOE for the adult applicator (dermal and inhalation
routes) was approximately 400 assuming the same person applied granules
to all three settings (vegetable gardens, ornamentals, and trees) on the
same day.

The results of the screening-level, non-dietary (residential) consumer
applicator (dermal and inhalation) and post-application (adult dermal,
and child dermal and incidental ingestion) risk analysis for Metaldehyde
use for lawn care, demonstrate that acceptable Margins of Exposure
(MOEs) exist for various lawn care methods evaluated, i.e., spot
treatment of lawns via hand dispersion of granules or low pressure
hand-wand spraying, or granular broadcast treatment of lawns via
push-spreaders.  Using worst-case conditions (e.g., no gloves during
application, maximum application rates, high contact reentry activities
on the day of broadcast treatment), the overall total intake ranged from
approximately 0.232 mg/kg/day for the adult applicator (dermal and
inhalation routes; MOE= 3950) for granular lawn broadcast treatment
(push spreader) to 0.0328 mg/kg/day (MOE = 30,370) for spot treatment
using a low pressure hand-wand sprayer.

Based on this assessment, it can be concluded that the potential
residential/consumer application exposures associated with the use of
Metaldehyde-based products for slug and snail control are associated
with a “reasonable certainty of no harm.”

D. Cumulative Effects

There is no evidence to indicate or suggest that Metaldehyde has any
toxic effects on mammals that would be cumulative with those of any
other chemicals.

E. Safety Determination

1. U.S. population. As indicated above, the predicted acute exposure is
0.00314 mg/kg day. Based on the acute NOAEL and reference dose (75 and
0.75 mg/kg bw/day, respectively), this exposure estimate results in
intake of approximately 0.42% of the aPAD at the 95th percentile (MOE =
23876).  The predicted chronic exposure for the overall U.S. population
is 0.0010 mg/kg bw/day, or 1.03% of the cPAD (based on the chronic NOAEL
of 10 mg/kg bw/day).

Because the predicted exposures, expressed as percentages of the aPAD
and cPAD are well below 100%, there is reasonable certainty that no
acute or chronic effects in the U.S. population would result from
dietary exposure to Metaldehyde.

2.   Infants and children. The population subgroup with the highest
level of acute exposure at the 95th percentile is children 1-2 years of
age.  The estimated acute exposure is 0.00801 mg/kg bw/day, or 1.07% of
the aPAD (MOE =9364).  The estimated chronic exposure is 0.0027 mg/kg
bw/day equivalent to 2.67% of the cPAD.  Because the predicted
exposures, expressed as percentages of the aPAD and cPAD are well below
100%, there is reasonable certainty that no acute or chronic effects
would result in the population subgroup with the highest level of
exposure (children 1-2 years) from dietary exposure to Metaldehyde.

F. International Tolerances

No incompatibilities with international tolerances are expected.

 PAGE  2


[Federal Register: September 30, 2009 (Volume 74, Number 188)]
[Notices]
[Page 50199-50201]
[DOCID:fr30se09-49]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY

[EPA-HQ-OPP-2005-0123; FRL-8792-8]

Methyl Bromide; Notice of Receipt of Requests to Amend Pesticide
Registrations to Terminate Uses of Certain Products

AGENCY: Environmental Protection Agency (EPA).

ACTION: Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY:  In accordance with section 6(f)(1) of the Federal
Insecticide, Fungicide, and Rodenticide Act (FIFRA), as amended, EPA is
issuing a notice of receipt of requests by the registrants to amend
their registrations to terminate uses of certain products containing
the pesticide methyl bromide. The requests would terminate post harvest
methyl bromide use in or on alfalfa hay and cottonseed. The requests
would terminate alfalfa hay and cottonseed uses from all methyl bromide
products registered for use in the United States. EPA intends to grant
these requests at the close of the comment period for this announcement
unless the Agency receives substantive comments within the comment
period that would merit its further review of the requests, or unless
the registrants withdraw their requests within this period. Upon
acceptance of these requests, any sale, distribution, or use of
products listed in this notice will be permitted only if such sale,
distribution, or use is consistent with the terms as described in the
final order.

DATES:  Comments must be received on or before October 30, 2009.

ADDRESSES:  Submit your comments, identified by docket identification
(ID) number EPA-HQ-OPP-2005-0123, by one of the following methods:
     Federal eRulemaking Portal: http://www.regulations.gov.
Follow the on-line instructions for submitting comments.
     Mail: Office of Pesticide Programs (OPP) Regulatory Public
Docket (7502P), Environmental Protection Agency, 1200 Pennsylvania
Ave., NW., Washington, DC 20460-0001.
     Delivery: OPP Regulatory Public Docket (7502P),
Environmental Protection Agency, Rm. S-4400, One Potomac Yard (South
Bldg.), 2777 S. Crystal Dr., Arlington, VA. Deliveries are only
accepted during the Docket Facility's normal hours of operation 8:30
a.m. to 4 p.m., Monday through Friday, excluding legal holidays.
Special arrangements should be made for deliveries of boxed
information. The Docket Facility telephone number is<PHONE_NUMBER>.
    Instructions: Direct your comments to docket ID number EPA-HQ-OPP-
2005-0123. EPA's policy is that all comments received will be included
in the docket without change and may be made available on-line at
http://www.regulations.gov, including any personal information
provided, unless the comment includes information claimed to be
Confidential Business Information (CBI) or other information whose
disclosure is restricted by statute. Do not submit information that you
consider to be CBI or otherwise protected through regulations.gov or e-
mail. The regulations.gov website is an ``anonymous access'' system,
which means EPA will not know your identity or contact information
unless you provide it in the body of your comment. If you send an e-
mail comment directly to EPA without going through regulations.gov,
your e-mail address will be automatically captured and included as part
of the comment that is placed in the docket and made available on the
Internet. If you submit an electronic comment, EPA recommends that you
include your name and other contact information in the body of your
comment and with any disk or CD-ROM you submit. If EPA cannot read your
comment due to technical difficulties and cannot contact you for
clarification, EPA may not be able to consider your comment. Electronic
files should avoid the use of special characters, any form of
encryption, and be free of any defects or viruses.
    Docket: All documents in the docket are listed in the docket index
available at http://www.regulations.gov. Although listed in the index,
some information is not publicly available, e.g., CBI or other
information whose disclosure is restricted by statute. Certain other
material, such as copyrighted material, is not placed on the Internet
and will be publicly available only in hard copy form. Publicly
available docket materials are available either in the electronic
docket at http://www.regulations.gov, or, if only available in hard
copy, at the OPP Regulatory Public Docket in Rm. S-4400, One Potomac
Yard (South Bldg.), 2777 S. Crystal Dr., Arlington, VA. The hours of
operation of this Docket Facility are from 8:30 a.m. to 4 p.m., Monday
through Friday, excluding legal holidays. The Docket Facility telephone
number is<PHONE_NUMBER>.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:  Susan Bartow, Pesticide Re-evaluation
Division (7508P), Office of Pesticide Programs, Environmental
Protection Agency, 1200 Pennsylvania Ave., NW., Washington, DC 20460-
0001; telephone number:<PHONE_NUMBER>; fax number:<PHONE_NUMBER>; e-
mail address<EMAIL_ADDRESS>
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

I. General Information

A. Does this Action Apply to Me?

    This action is directed to the public in general, and may be of
interest to a wide range of stakeholders including environmental, human
health, and agricultural advocates; the chemical industry; pesticide
users; and members of the public interested in the sale, distribution,
or use of pesticides. Since

others also may be interested, the Agency has not attempted to describe
all the specific entities that may be affected by this action. If you
have any questions regarding the applicability of this action to a
particular entity, consult the person listed under FOR FURTHER
INFORMATION CONTACT.

B. What Should I Consider as I Prepare My Comments for EPA?

    1.  Submitting CBI. Do not submit this information to EPA through
regulations.gov or e-mail. Clearly mark the part or all of the
information that you claim to be CBI. For CBI information in a disk or
CD-ROM that you mail to EPA, mark the outside of the disk or CD-ROM as
CBI and then identify electronically within the disk or CD-ROM the
specific information that is claimed as CBI. In addition to one
complete version of the comment that includes information claimed as
CBI, a copy of the comment that does not contain the information
claimed as CBI must be submitted for inclusion in the public docket.
Information so marked will not be disclosed except in accordance with
procedures set forth in 40 CFR part 2.
    2. Tips for preparing your comments. When submitting comments,
remember to:
    i. Identify the document by docket ID number and other identifying
information subject heading, Federal Register date and page number.
    ii. Follow directions. The Agency may ask you to respond to
specific questions or organize comments by referencing a Code of
Federal Regulations (CFR) part or section number.
    iii . Explain why you agree or disagree; suggest alternatives and
substitute language for your requested changes.
    iv. Describe any assumptions and provide any technical information
and/or data that you used.
    v. If you estimate potential costs or burdens, explain how you
arrived at your estimate in sufficient detail to allow for it to be
reproduced.
    vi. Provide specific examples to illustrate your concerns and
suggest alternatives.
    vii. Explain your views as clearly as possible, avoiding the use of
profanity or personal threats.
    viii. Make sure to submit your comments by the comment period
deadline identified.

II. Background on the Receipt of Requests to Cancel and/or Amend
Registrations to Delete Uses

    This notice announces receipt by EPA of requests from registrants
Great Lakes Chemical a Chemtura Company, Soil Chemicals Corporation
doing business as Cardinal Professional Products, and ICL-IP America,
Inc. to amend to terminate uses of 5785-11, Meth-O-Gas 100, 5785-41,
Meth-O-Gas Q; 8536-15, Methyl Bromide 100, 8536-29, Methyl Bromide
Quarantine Fumigant; 8622-16, Metabrom 100, and 8622-55, Metabrom Q
product registrations. In letters dated June 29, 2009, June 30, 2009,
and July 21, 2009, Great Lakes Chemical, a Chemtura Company, Soil
Chemicals Corporation doing business as Cardinal Professional Products,
and ICL-IP America, Inc. requested EPA to amend to terminate uses of
pesticide product registrations identified in Table 1 of this notice.
Specifically, the registrants request voluntary termination of post-
harvest alfalfa hay and post-harvest cottonseed uses of methyl bromide.
The registrants also request the following provisions for sale,
distribution, and use of existing stocks: All sale or distribution by
the registrant of existing stocks labeled for post-harvest alfalfa hay
and post-harvest cottonseed uses is prohibited after October 31, 2009,
unless that sale or distribution is solely for the purpose of
facilitating disposal or export of the product.
     Existing stocks labeled for post-harvest alfalfa hay and post-
harvest cottonseed uses may be sold and distributed by persons other
than the registrant until October 31, 2010.
     Existing stocks labeled for post-harvest alfalfa hay and post
harvest cottonseed uses may be used until all such stocks are
exhausted, provided that such use complies with the EPA-approved label
of the product.
     Action on the registrants' requests would terminate alfalfa hay
and cottonseed uses from all methyl bromide products registered for use
in the United States.

III. What Action is the Agency Taking?

    This notice announces receipt by EPA of requests from registrants
to amend to terminate uses of methyl bromide product registrations. The
affected products and the registrants making the requests are
identified in Tables 1 and 2 of this unit.
    Under section 6(f)(1)(A) of FIFRA, registrants may request, at any
time, that their pesticide registrations be canceled or amended to
terminate one or more pesticide uses. Section 6(f)(1)(B) of FIFRA
requires that before acting on a request for voluntary cancellation,
EPA must provide a 30-day public comment period on the request for
voluntary cancellation or use termination. In addition, section
6(f)(1)(C) of FIFRA requires that EPA provide a 180-day comment period
on a request for voluntary cancellation or termination of any minor
agricultural use before granting the request, unless:
    1. The registrants request a waiver of the comment period, or
    2. The Administrator determines that continued use of the pesticide
would pose an unreasonable adverse effect on the environment.
    The methyl bromide registrants have requested that EPA waive the
180-day comment period. EPA will provide a 30-day comment period on the
proposed requests.
    Unless a request is withdrawn by the registrant within 30 days of
publication of this notice, or if the Agency determines that there are
substantive comments that warrant further review of this request, an
order will be issued amending the affected registrations.

Table 1.--Methyl Bromide Product Registrations with Pending Requests for
                                Amendment
------------------------------------------------------------------------
       Registration Number           Product Name           Company
------------------------------------------------------------------------
5785-11                           Meth-O-Gas 100      Great Lakes
                                                       Chemical a
                                                       Chemtura Company
------------------------------------------------------------------------
5785-41                           Meth-O-Gas Q        Great Lakes
                                                       Chemical a
                                                       Chemtura Company
------------------------------------------------------------------------
8536-15                           Methyl Bromide 100  Soil Chemicals
                                                       Corporation doing
                                                       business as
                                                       Cardinal
                                                       Professional
                                                       Products
------------------------------------------------------------------------
8536-29                           Methyl Bromide      Soil Chemicals
                                   Quarantine          Corporation doing
                                   Fumigant            business as
                                                       Cardinal
                                                       Professional
                                                       Products
------------------------------------------------------------------------

8622-16                           Metabrom 100        ICL-IP America,
                                                       Inc.
------------------------------------------------------------------------
8622-55                           Metabrom Q          ICL-IP America,
                                                       Inc.
------------------------------------------------------------------------

    Table 2 of this unit includes the names and addresses of record for
the registrants of the products listed in Table 1 of this unit.

               Table 2.--Registrants Requesting Amendments
------------------------------------------------------------------------
            EPA Company Number                Company Name and Address
------------------------------------------------------------------------
5785                                        Great Lakes Chemical
                                             Corporation
                                            P.O. Box 2200
                                            West Lafayette, IN 47996-
                                             2200
------------------------------------------------------------------------
8536                                        Soil Chemicals Corporation
                                             (doing business as Cardinal
                                             Professional Products)
                                            P.O. Box 782
                                            Hollister, CA 95024-9487
------------------------------------------------------------------------
8622                                        ICL-IP America, Inc.
                                            95 MacCorkle Avenue, S.W.
                                            South Charleston, WV 25303-
                                             1411
------------------------------------------------------------------------

IV. What is the Agency's Authority for Taking this Action?

    Section 6(f)(1) of FIFRA provides that a registrant of a pesticide
product may at any time request that any of its pesticide registrations
be canceled or amended to terminate one or more uses. FIFRA further
provides that, before acting on the request, EPA must publish a notice
of receipt of any such request in the Federal Register. Thereafter,
following the public comment period, the Administrator may approve such
a request.

V. Procedures for Withdrawal of Request and Considerations for
Reregistration of Methyl Bromide

    Registrants who choose to withdraw a request for cancellation must
submit such withdrawal in writing to the person listed under FOR
FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT, postmarked before October 30, 2009. This
written withdrawal of the request for cancellation will apply only to
the applicable FIFRA section 6(f)(1) request listed in this notice. If
the products(s) have been subject to a previous cancellation action,
the effective date of cancellation and all other provisions of any
earlier cancellation action are controlling.

VI. Provisions for Disposition of Existing Stocks

    Existing stocks are those stocks of registered pesticide products
which are currently in the United States and which were packaged,
labeled, and released for shipment prior to the effective date of the
cancellation order.
     In any order issued in response to these requests for amendments
to terminate uses, the Agency proposes to include the following
provisions for the treatment of any existing stocks of the products
identified or referenced in Table 1 in Unit III:
     All sale or distribution by the registrant of existing stocks
labeled for post-harvest alfalfa hay and post-harvest cottonseed uses
is prohibited after October 31, 2009, unless that sale or distribution
is solely for the purpose of facilitating disposal or export of the
product. Existing stocks labeled for post-harvest alfalfa hay and post-
harvest cottonseed uses may be sold and distributed by persons other
than the registrant until October 31, 2010. Existing stocks labeled for
post-harvest alfalfa hay and post-harvest cottonseed uses may be used
until all such stocks are exhausted, provided that such use complies
with the EPA-approved label of the product.
    If the request for use termination is granted, the Agency intends
to publish the cancellation order in the Federal Register.

List of Subjects

    Environmental protection, Pesticides and pests.

    Dated: September 22, 2009.
 Richard P. Keigwin, Jr.
Director, Pesticide Re-evaluation Division, Office of Pesticide
Programs.
[FR Doc. E9-23458 Filed 9-29-09; 8:45 a.m.]

BILLING CODE 6560-50-S


[Federal Register Volume 74, Number 115 (Wednesday, June 17, 2009)]
[Notices]
[Pages 28702-28703]
[FR Doc No: E9-14236]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY

[EPA-HQ-OPP-2009-0333; FRL-8420-4]

Pesticide Products; Registration Applications

AGENCY: Environmental Protection Agency (EPA).

ACTION: Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: This notice announces receipt of applications to register
pesticide products containing new active ingredients not included in
any currently registered products pursuant to the provisions of section
3(c)(4) of the Federal Insecticide, Fungicide, and Rodenticide Act
(FIFRA), as amended.

DATES: Comments must be received on or before July 17, 2009.

ADDRESSES: Submit your comments, identified by docket identification
(ID) number EPA-HQ-OPP-2009-0333, by one of the following methods:
     Federal eRulemaking Portal: http://www.regulations.gov.
Follow the on-line instructions for submitting comments.
     Mail: Office of Pesticide Programs (OPP) Regulatory Public
Docket (7502P), Environmental Protection Agency, 1200 Pennsylvania
Ave., NW., Washington, DC 20460-0001.
     Delivery: OPP Regulatory Public Docket (7502P),
Environmental Protection Agency, Rm. S-4400, One Potomac Yard (South
Bldg.), 2777 S. Crystal Dr., Arlington, VA. Deliveries are only
accepted during the Docket Facility's normal hours of operation (8:30
a.m. to 4 p.m., Monday through Friday, excluding legal holidays).
Special arrangements should be made for deliveries of boxed
information. The Docket Facility telephone number is<PHONE_NUMBER>.
    Instructions: Direct your comments to docket ID number EPA-HQ-OPP-
2009-0333. EPA's policy is that all comments received will be included
in the docket without change and may be made available on-line at
http://www.regulations.gov, including any personal information
provided, unless the comment includes information claimed to be
Confidential Business Information (CBI) or other information whose
disclosure is restricted by statute. Do not submit information that you
consider to be CBI or otherwise protected through regulations.gov or e-
mail. The regulations.gov website is an ``anonymous access'' system,
which means EPA will not know your identity or contact information
unless you provide it in the body of your comment. If you send an e-
mail comment directly to EPA without going through regulations.gov,
your e-mail address will be automatically captured and included as part
of the comment that is placed in the docket and made available on the
Internet. If you submit an electronic comment, EPA recommends that you
include your name and other contact information in the body of your
comment and with any disk or CD-ROM you submit. If EPA cannot read your
comment due to technical difficulties and cannot contact you for
clarification, EPA may not be able to consider your comment. Electronic
files should avoid the use of special characters, any form of
encryption, and be free of any defects or viruses.
    Docket: All documents in the docket are listed in the docket index
available at http://www.regulations.gov. Although listed in the index,
some information is not publicly available, e.g., CBI or other
information whose disclosure is restricted by statute. Certain other
material, such as copyrighted material, is not placed on the Internet
and will be publicly available only in hard copy form. Publicly
available docket materials are available either in the electronic
docket at http://www.regulations.gov, or, if only available in hard
copy, at the OPP Regulatory Public Docket in Rm. S-4400, One Potomac
Yard (South Bldg.), 2777 S. Crystal Dr., Arlington, VA. The hours of
operation of this Docket Facility are from 8:30 a.m. to 4 p.m., Monday
through Friday, excluding legal holidays. The Docket Facility telephone
number is<PHONE_NUMBER>.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Leonard Cole, Biopesticides and
Pollution Prevention Division (7511P), Office of Pesticide Programs,

Environmental Protection Agency, 1200 Pennsylvania Ave., NW.,
Washington, DC 20460-0001; telephone number:<PHONE_NUMBER>; e-mail
address<EMAIL_ADDRESS>
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

I. General Information

A. Does this Action Apply to Me?

    You may be potentially affected by this action if you are an
agricultural producer, food manufacturer, or pesticide manufacturer.
Potentially affected entities may include, but are not limited to:
     Crop production (NAICS code 111).
     Animal production (NAICS code 112).
     Food manufacturing (NAICS code 311).
     Pesticide manufacturing (NAICS code 32532).
    This listing is not intended to be exhaustive, but rather provides
a guide for readers regarding entities likely to be affected by this
action. Other types of entities not listed in this unit could also be
affected. The North American Industrial Classification System (NAICS)
codes have been provided to assist you and others in determining
whether this action might apply to certain entities. If you have any
questions regarding the applicability of this action to a particular
entity, consult the person listed under FOR FURTHER INFORMATION
CONTACT.

B. What Should I Consider as I Prepare My Comments for EPA?

     1. Submitting CBI. Do not submit this information to EPA through
regulations.gov or e-mail. Clearly mark the part or all of the
information that you claim to be CBI. For CBI information in a disk or
CD-ROM that you mail to EPA, mark the outside of the disk or CD-ROM as
CBI and then identify electronically within the disk or CD-ROM the
specific information that is claimed as CBI. In addition to one
complete version of the comment that includes information claimed as
CBI, a copy of the comment that does not contain the information
claimed as CBI must be submitted for inclusion in the public docket.
Information so marked will not be disclosed except in accordance with
procedures set forth in 40 CFR part 2.
    2. Tips for preparing your comments. When submitting comments,
remember to:
    i. Identify the document by docket ID number and other identifying
information (subject heading, Federal Register date and page number).
     ii. Follow directions. The Agency may ask you to respond to
specific questions or organize comments by referencing a Code of
Federal Regulations (CFR) part or section number.
    iii. Explain why you agree or disagree; suggest alternatives and
substitute language for your requested changes.
    iv. Describe any assumptions and provide any technical information
and/or data that you used.
    v. If you estimate potential costs or burdens, explain how you
arrived at your estimate in sufficient detail to allow for it to be
reproduced.
    vi. Provide specific examples to illustrate your concerns and
suggest alternatives.
    vii. Explain your views as clearly as possible, avoiding the use of
profanity or personal threats.
    viii. Make sure to submit your comments by the comment period
deadline identified.

II. Registration Applications

    EPA received applications as follows to register pesticide products
containing active ingredients not included in any previously registered
products pursuant to the provision of section 3(c)(4) of FIFRA. Notice
of receipt of these applications does not imply a decision by the
Agency on the applications.
    File Symbol: 432-RLNE, 432-RLNG, 432-RLNU. Applicant: Bayer
Environmental Science, 2 T.W. Alexander Drive, P.O. Box 12014, Research
Triangle Park, NC 27709. Product name: Penta-termanone WP, Premise[reg]
Plus 75WP, Penta-Termanone\TM\ Technical. Active ingredient: 0.041%
Penta-Termanon; 75% Imidacloprid, 0.027% Penta-Termanon; 100% Penta-
Termanone. Proposal classification/Use: Termiticide.

List of Subjects

    Environmental protection, Pesticides and pest.

    Dated: June 9, 2009.
Janet L. Andersen,
Director, Biopesticides and Pollution Prevention Division, Office of
Pesticide Programs.

[FR Doc. E9-14236 Filed 6-16-09; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6560-50-S