[Federal Register Volume 78, Number 219 (Wednesday, November 13, 2013)]
[Notices]
[Pages 68050-68052]
[FR Doc No: 2013-27064]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission

Combined Notice of Filings 1

    Take notice that the Commission received the following electric
corporate filings:

    Docket Numbers: EC14-20-000.
    Applicants: RE Rosamond One LLC, RE Rosamond Two LLC.
    Description: Application for Authorization for Disposition of
Jurisdictional Facilities and Requests for Waivers, Confidential
Treatment, and Expedited Consideration of RE Rosamond One LLC and RE
Rosamond Two LLC.
    Filed Date: 11/1/13.
    Accession Number: 20131101-5187.
    Comments Due: 5 p.m. ET 11/22/13.

    Docket Numbers: EC14-21-000.
    Applicants: Malacha Hydro Limited Partnership, BAIF Malacha
Holdings LLC, CD Malacha I, Inc.
    Description: Joint Application for Authorization Under Section 203
of the Federal Power Act of Malacha Hydro Limited Partnership.
    Filed Date: 11/1/13.
    Accession Number: 20131101-5237.
    Comments Due: 5 p.m. ET 11/22/13.

    Docket Numbers: EC14-22-000.
    Applicants: Victory Garden Phase IV, LLC, Sagebrush, a California
partnership, Sagebrush Partner Sixteen, Inc., Alpah Joshua, Inc., Alpha
Joshua (Prime), Inc., Beta Willow (Prime), Inc., Beta Willow, Inc.,
Beta Joshua, Inc.
    Description: Application for Authorization for Disposition of
Jurisdictional Facilities, Request for Confidential Treatment, and
Request for Expedited Consideration of Victory Garden Phase IV, LLC, et
al.
    Filed Date: 11/1/13.
    Accession Number: 20131101-5239.
    Comments Due: 5 p.m. ET 11/22/13.

    Take notice that the Commission received the following electric
rate filings:

    Docket Numbers: ER11-3918-001.
    Applicants: Black Hills/Colorado Electric Utility Co.
    Description: Compliance Filing to be effective 7/1/2011.
    Filed Date: 11/1/13.
    Accession Number: 20131101-5104.
    Comments Due: 5 p.m. ET 11/22/13.

    Docket Numbers: ER13-2031-001.
    Applicants: Southwest Power Pool, Inc.
    Description: Compliance Withdrawal Revisions Bylaws/MA to be
effective 9/23/2013.
    Filed Date: 11/1/13.
    Accession Number: 20131101-5143.
    Comments Due: 5 p.m. ET 11/22/13.

    Docket Numbers: ER14-45-001.
    Applicants: Midcontinent Independent System Operator, Inc.
    Description: 11-1-2013 Forward-ATC LGIA Amendment to be effective
10/8/2013.
    Filed Date: 11/1/13.
    Accession Number: 20131101-5168.

    Comments Due: 5 p.m. ET 11/22/13.

    Docket Numbers: ER14-249-000.
    Applicants: Portland General Electric Company.
    Description: NTTG Funding Agreement to be effective 1/1/2014.
    Filed Date: 10/31/13.
    Accession Number: 20131031-5231.
    Comments Due: 5 p.m. ET 11/21/13.

    Docket Numbers: ER14-281-000.
    Applicants: Midcontinent Independent System Operator, Inc.
    Description: 11-1-13 Credit Clean-Up to be effective 2/1/2014.
    Filed Date: 11/1/13.
    Accession Number: 20131101-5172.
    Comments Due: 5 p.m. ET 11/22/13.

    Docket Numbers: ER14-282-000.
    Applicants: Wyoming Colorado Intertie, LLC.
    Description: Notice of TSA Termination Between WCI and Wyoming Wind
to be effective 10/31/2013.
    Filed Date: 11/1/13.
    Accession Number: 20131101-5175.
    Comments Due: 5 p.m. ET 11/22/13.

    Docket Numbers: ER14-283-000.
    Applicants: Southwest Power Pool, Inc.
    Description: EIS Market Offer Cap Update 2014 to be effective 1/1/
2014.
    Filed Date: 11/1/13.
    Accession Number: 20131101-5176.
    Comments Due: 5 p.m. ET 11/22/13.

    Docket Numbers: ER14-284-000.
    Applicants: Rainbow Energy Ventures, LLC.
    Description: Notice of Cancellation of Tariff to be effective 11/2/
2013.
    Filed Date: 11/1/13.
    Accession Number: 20131101-5177.
    Comments Due: 5 p.m. ET 11/22/13.

    Docket Numbers: ER14-285-000.
    Applicants: The Narragansett Electric Company.
    Description: Baseline Narragansett Borderline Tariff to be
effective 11/2/2013.
    Filed Date: 11/1/13.
    Accession Number: 20131101-5178.
    Comments Due: 5 p.m. ET 11/22/13.

    Docket Numbers: ER14-286-000.
    Applicants: Midcontinent Independent System Operator, Inc.
    Description: 11-1-2013 SA 2523 ITC-Pheasant Run Amended GIA to be
effective 11/2/2013.
    Filed Date: 11/1/13.
    Accession Number: 20131101-5182.
    Comments Due: 5 p.m. ET 11/22/13.

    Docket Numbers: ER14-287-000.
    Applicants: Midcontinent Independent System Operator, Inc.
    Description: 11-1-2013 SA 2603 Cumberland-Bush MPFCA to be
effective 11/2/2013.
    Filed Date: 11/1/13.
    Accession Number: 20131101-5184.
    Comments Due: 5 p.m. ET 11/22/13.

    Docket Numbers: ER14-288-000.
    Applicants: Exelon Framingham, LLC.
    Description: Notice of Cancellation to be effective 1/1/2014.
    Filed Date: 11/1/13.
    Accession Number: 20131101-5196.
    Comments Due: 5 p.m. ET 11/22/13.

    Docket Numbers: ER14-289-000.
    Applicants: Exelon New Boston, LLC.
    Description: Notice of Cancellation to be effective 1/1/2014.
    Filed Date: 11/1/13.
    Accession Number: 20131101-5202.
    Comments Due: 5 p.m. ET 11/22/13.

    Docket Numbers: ER14-290-000.
    Applicants: Exelon West Medway, LLC.
    Description: Notice of Cancellation to be effective 1/1/2014.
    Filed Date: 11/1/13.
    Accession Number: 20131101-5205.
    Comments Due: 5 p.m. ET 11/22/13.

    Docket Numbers: ER14-291-000.
    Applicants: California Independent System Operator Corporation.
    Description: 2013-11-01--Petition--Tariff Waiver--Penasquitos to be
effective N/A.
    Filed Date: 11/1/13.
    Accession Number: 20131101-5207.
    Comments Due: 5 p.m. ET 11/22/13.

    Docket Numbers: ER14-292-000.
    Applicants: Midcontinent Independent System Operator, Inc.
    Description: SA 6505 Big Rivers Electric--Coleman SSR to be
effective 9/1/2013.
    Filed Date: 11/1/13.
    Accession Number: 20131101-5208.
    Comments Due: 5 p.m. ET 11/22/13.

    Docket Numbers: ER14-293-000.
    Applicants: Exelon Wyman, LLC.
    Description: Notice of Cancellation to be effective 1/1/2014.
    Filed Date: 11/1/13.
    Accession Number: 20131101-5210.
    Comments Due: 5 p.m. ET 11/22/13.

    Docket Numbers: ER14-294-000.
    Applicants: Midcontinent Independent System Operator, Inc.
    Description: 11-01-2013 Schedule 43F Big Rivers Coleman SSR to be
effective 9/1/2013.
    Filed Date: 11/1/13.
    Accession Number: 20131101-5214.
    Comments Due: 5 p.m. ET 11/22/13.

    Docket Numbers: ER14-295-000.
    Applicants: Midcontinent Independent System Operator, Inc.
    Description: 2013-11-01 OASIS Filing to be effective 1/15/2014.
    Filed Date: 11/1/13.
    Accession Number: 20131101-5216.
    Comments Due: 5 p.m. ET 11/22/13.

    Docket Numbers: ER14-296-000.
    Applicants: Union Power Partners, L.P.
    Description: Proposed Rate Schedule FERC No. 2 to be effective 1/1/
2014.
    Filed Date: 11/1/13.
    Accession Number: 20131101-5219.
    Comments Due: 5 p.m. ET 11/22/13.

    Docket Numbers: ER14-297-000.
    Applicants: PJM Interconnection, L.L.C.
    Description: Revisions to the PJM OATT & OA re Tier 2 Synch Reserve
Performance Validation to be effective 1/1/2014.
    Filed Date: 11/1/13.
    Accession Number: 20131101-5221.
    Comments Due: 5 p.m. ET 11/22/13.

    Docket Numbers: ER14-298-000.
    Applicants: Kansas City Power & Light Company.
    Description: KCP&L Rate Schedule 137 Filing to be effective 1/1/
2014.
    Filed Date: 11/1/13.
    Accession Number: 20131101-5222.
    Comments Due: 5 p.m. ET 11/22/13.

    Docket Numbers: ER14-299-000.
    Applicants: Midcontinent Independent System Operator, Inc.
    Description: 11-1-2013 G746 Termination to be effective 1/1/2014.
    Filed Date: 11/4/13.
    Accession Number: 20131104-5001.
    Comments Due: 5 p.m. ET 11/25/13.

    Take notice that the Commission received the following electric
securities filings:

    Docket Numbers: ES12-3-001.
    Applicants: National Grid USA.
    Description: Supplement to Request for Extension of Existing
Authorization to Issue Securities under Section 204 of the Federal
Power Act, Request for Waivers and for Shortened Comment Period of
National Grid USA.
    Filed Date: 10/31/13.
    Accession Number: 20131031-5283.
    Comments Due: 5 p.m. ET 11/12/13.

    Take notice that the Commission received the following qualifying
facility filings:

    Docket Numbers: QF14-53-000.
    Applicants: Jasmin Power III--SD 6000, LLC.
    Description: Form 556 of Jasmin Power III--SD 6000, LLC.
    Filed Date: 11/1/13.
    Accession Number: 20131101-5235.
    Comments Due: 5 p.m. ET 11/22/13.

    The filings are accessible in the Commission's eLibrary system by
clicking on the links or querying the docket number.
    Any person desiring to intervene or protest in any of the above
proceedings must file in accordance with Rules 211 and 214 of the
Commission's

Regulations (18 CFR 385.211 and 385.214) on or before 5:00 p.m. Eastern
time on the specified comment date. Protests may be considered, but
intervention is necessary to become a party to the proceeding.
    eFiling is encouraged. More detailed information relating to filing
requirements, interventions, protests, service, and qualifying
facilities filings can be found at: http://www.ferc.gov/docs-filing/efiling/filing-req.pdf. For other information, call<PHONE_NUMBER>
(toll free). For TTY, call<PHONE_NUMBER>.

    Dated: November 4, 2013.
Nathaniel J. Davis, Sr.,
Deputy Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2013-27064 Filed 11-12-13; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6717-01-P


[Federal Register Volume 79, Number 177 (Friday, September 12, 2014)]
[Notices]
[Page 54775]
[FR Doc No: 2014-21800]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION

Federal Aviation Administration

Twenty-Seventh Meeting: RTCA Special Committee 224, Airport
Security Access Control Systems

AGENCY: Federal Aviation Administration (FAA), U.S. Department of
Transportation (DOT).

ACTION: Meeting Notice of RTCA Special Committee 224, Airport Security
Access Control Systems.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The FAA is issuing this notice to advise the public of the
twenty-seventh meeting of the RTCA Special Committee 224, Airport
Security Access Control Systems.

DATES: The meeting will be held on September 23rd, 2014 from 10:00
a.m.-2:00 p.m.

ADDRESSES: The meeting will be held at RTCA, Inc., 1150 18th Street
NW., Suite 910, Washington, DC 20036.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: The RTCA Secretariat, 1150 18th Street
NW., Suite 910, Washington, DC 20036, or by telephone at (202) 833-
9339, fax at<PHONE_NUMBER>, or Web site at http://www.rtca.org.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Pursuant to section 10(a)(2) of the Federal
Advisory Committee Act (Pub. L. 92-463, 5 U.S.C., App.), notice is
hereby given for a meeting of Special Committee 224. The agenda will
include the following:

September 23rd, 2014

 Welcome/Introductions/Administrative Remarks
 Report from the TSA
 Report on Safe Skies Document Distribution
 Individual Document Section Reports
 Action Items for Next Meeting
 Time and Place of Next Meeting
 Any Other Business
 Adjourn

    Attendance is open to the interested public but limited to space
availability. With the approval of the chairman, members of the public
may present oral statements at the meeting. Persons wishing to present
statements or obtain information should contact the person listed in
the FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT section. Members of the public may
present a written statement to the committee at any time.

    Issued in Washington, DC, on September 8th 2014.
Mohannad Dawoud,
Management Analyst, NextGen, Business Operations Group, Federal
Aviation Administration.
[FR Doc. 2014-21800 Filed 9-11-14; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910-13-P


			  UNITED STATES OF AMERICA

		        DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION

			  OFFICE OF THE SECRETARY

			          WASHINGTON, D.C.

Issued by the Department of Transportation on February 16, 2006

NOTICE OF ACTION TAKEN -- DOCKET OST-2003-16219

________________________________________________________________________
________________________________________________________

This serves as notice to the public of the action described below, taken
by the Department official indicated (no additional confirming order
will be issued in this matter).

Applicant:  Spanair, S.A. 								Date Filed: January 25, 2005

Relief requested:  Renew exemption from 49 U.S.C. § 41301 to engage in
scheduled foreign air transportation of persons, property and mail (a)
between Barcelona and Madrid, Spain, on the one hand, and Philadelphia,
Pennsylvania, on the other hand, and (b) beyond Philadelphia to Atlanta,
Boston, Baltimore, Washington, D.C. (Reagan National), Denver,
Dallas/Fort Worth, Houston, Las Vegas, Los Angeles, New York (LGA),
Orlando, Miami, Minneapolis, New Orleans, Chicago, Phoenix, Pittsburgh,
San Diego, Seattle, San Francisco and San Juan, Puerto Rico, only
pursuant to a code-share arrangement with US Airways, a U.S.
certificated air carrier.

If renewal, date and citation of last action:  January 26, 2005, in this
docket

Applicant representative:  Michael F. Goldman<PHONE_NUMBER>

DOT Analyst:  Shelita A. Smith<PHONE_NUMBER>

Responsive pleadings:  None filed

DISPOSITION

Action:  Approved										Action date:  February 16, 2006

Effective dates of exemption authority granted:  February 16, 2006 –
February 16, 2007

Basis for approval (bilateral agreement/reciprocity): U.S.-Spain
bilateral aviation agreement

Except to the extent exempted/waived, this authority is subject to the
terms, conditions, and limitations indicated:

   X    Standard exemption conditions (attached)              X
Foreign air carrier permit   (Order 2000-5-28)

   X    Code-Share conditions previously imposed on Spanair and US
Airways (see Notice of Action Taken, dated November 17, 2003, in this
docket)

Special conditions/Partial grant/Denial basis/Remarks:

Action taken by:  Paul L. Gretch, Director

		   Office of International Aviation

________________________________________________________________________
________________________________________________________

Under authority assigned by the Department in its regulations, 14 CFR
Part 385, we found that (1) the applicant is qualified to perform the
proposed operations; (2) our action was consistent with Department
policy; (3) grant of the authority was consistent with the public
interest; and (4) grant of the authority would not constitute a major
regulatory action under the Energy Policy and Conservation Act of 1975.
To the extent not granted/deferred/dismissed, we denied

all requests in the referenced Docket.  We may amend, modify, or revoke
the authority granted in this Notice at any time without hearing at our
discretion.

Persons entitled to petition the Department for review of the action set
forth in this Notice under the Department’s regulations, 14 CFR §
385.30, may file their petitions within seven (7) days after the date of
issuance of this Notice.  This action was effective when taken, and the
filing of a petition for review will not alter such effectiveness.

An electronic version of this document is available on the World Wide
Web at:

  HYPERLINK "http://dms.dot.gov//reports/reports_aviation.asp"
http://dms.dot.gov//reports/reports_aviation.asp

Foreign Carrier Exemption Conditions

In the conduct of the operations authorized, the foreign carrier
applicant(s) shall:

(1)  Not conduct any operations unless it holds a currently effective
authorization from its homeland for such operations, and it has filed a
copy of such authorization with the Department;

(2)  Comply with all applicable requirements of the Federal Aviation
Administration, including, but not limited to, 14 CFR Parts 129, 91, and
36, and with all applicable U.S. Government requirements concerning
security, including, but not limited to, 49 CFR Part 1546 or 1550, as
applicable.  To assure compliance with all applicable U.S. Government
requirements concerning security, the holder shall, before commencing
any new service (including charter flights) from a foreign airport that
would be the holder’s last point of departure for the United States,
contact its International Principal Security Inspector (IPSI) to advise
the IPSI of its plans and to find out whether the Transportation
Security Administration has determined that security is adequate to
allow such airport(s) to be served;

(3)  Comply with the requirements for minimum insurance coverage
contained in 14 CFR Part 205, and, prior to the commencement of any
operations under this authority, file evidence of such coverage, in the
form of a completed OST Form 6411, with the Federal Aviation
Administration’s Program Management Branch (AFS-260), Flight Standards
Service (any changes to, or termination of, insurance also shall be
filed with that office);

(4)  Not operate aircraft under this authority unless it complies with
operational safety requirements at least equivalent to Annex 6 of the
Chicago Convention;

(5)  Conform to the airworthiness and airman competency requirements of
its Government for international air services;

(6)  Except as specifically exempted or otherwise provided for in a
Department Order, comply with the requirements of 14 CFR Part 203,
concerning waiver of Warsaw Convention liability limits and defenses;

(7)  Agree that operations under this authority constitute a waiver of
sovereign immunity, for the purposes of 28 U.S.C. 1605(a), but only with
respect to those actions or proceedings instituted against it in any
court or other tribunal in the United States that are: (a)  based on its
operations in international air transportation that, according to the
contract of carriage, include a point in the United States as a point of
origin, point of destination, or agreed stopping place, or for which the
contract of carriage was purchased in the United States; or (b)  based
on a claim under any international agreement or treaty cognizable in any
court or other tribunal of the United States.  In this condition, the
term "international air transportation" means "international
transportation" as defined by the Warsaw Convention, except that all
States shall be considered to be High Contracting Parties for the
purpose of this definition;

(8)  Except as specifically authorized by the Department, originate or
terminate all flights to/from the United States in its homeland;

(9)  Comply with the requirements of 14 CFR Part 217, concerning the
reporting of scheduled, nonscheduled, and charter data;

(10) If charter operations are authorized, except as otherwise provided
in the applicable aviation agreement, comply with the Department's rules
governing charters (including 14 CFR Parts 212 and 380); and

(11) Comply with such other reasonable terms, conditions, and
limitations required by the public interest as may be prescribed by the
Department, with all applicable orders or regulations of other U.S.
agencies and courts, and with all applicable laws of the United States.

This authority shall not be effective during any period when the holder
is not in compliance with the conditions imposed above.  Moreover, this
authority cannot be sold or otherwise transferred without explicit
Department approval under Title 49 of the U.S. Code.

 Spainair’s services beyond Philadelphia to the twenty-one named U.S.
points will be offered on a blind-sector basis without local traffic
rights between U.S. points.

05/2004


[Federal Register Volume 78, Number 53 (Tuesday, March 19, 2013)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Pages 16783-16785]
[FR Doc No: 2013-06076]

=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY

40 CFR Part 52

[EPA-R04-OAR-2012-0448; FRL-9791-1]

Approval and Promulgation of Implementation Plans; Georgia;
Control Techniques Guidelines and Reasonably Available Control
Technology

AGENCY: Environmental Protection Agency (EPA).

ACTION: Correcting amendments.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: On September 28, 2012, EPA published a final rule in the
Federal Register approving Georgia State Implementation Plan (SIP)
revisions, submitted through the Georgia Environmental Protection
Division (GA EPD), related to reasonably available control technology
(RACT) requirements. This correcting amendment corrects errors in the
non-regulatory Code of Federal Regulations (CFR) language portion of
the September 28, 2012, final approval. Specifically, this correction
pertains to negative declarations made by GA EPD in its October 21,
2009, SIP submittal for certain source categories for which EPA has
issued control technique guidelines (CTG). EPA's September 28, 2012,
final rulemaking addressing Georgia's RACT revisions, approved the
negative declarations; however, they were inadvertently omitted from
the actual CFR non-regulatory language at the end of the final action.

DATES: Effective on March 19, 2013.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Jane Spann, Regulatory Development
Section, Air Planning Branch, Air, Pesticides and Toxics Management
Division, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Region 4, 61 Forsyth
Street SW., Atlanta, Georgia 30303-8960. Jane Spann may be reached by
phone at<PHONE_NUMBER> or by electronic mail address
<EMAIL_ADDRESS>
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: This action corrects an inadvertent omission
in EPA's September 28, 2012, final action approving Georgia's RACT
submittals. On October 21, 2009, Georgia submitted a SIP revision
containing, among other things, the Atlanta Area RACT SIP. In this RACT
submittal Georgia lists CTG source categories for which Georgia has
rules or has made negative declarations.\1\ On July 31, 2012 (77 FR
45307), EPA proposed approval of Georgia's October 21, 2009, SIP
revision, including the negative declarations included therein. In
EPA's September 28, 2012, final action (77 FR 59554), EPA approved
Georgia's October 21, 2009, submission, including the list of Georgia
rules and negative declarations. Towards the end of the September 28,
2012, final action, EPA inadvertently omitted the list of negative
declarations in the CFR non-regulatory language. Today's correcting
amendment will correct the CFR non-regulatory language to include the
following information. Georgia made negative declarations in its
October 21, 2009, SIP submittal related to the following CTG source
categories:
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \1\ If no major sources of volatile organic compounds (VOC) or
nitrous oxides emissions (each pollutant should be considered
separately) in a particular source category exist in an applicable
nonattainment area, a state may submit a negative declaration for
that category.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    1. Control of Volatile Organic Compound (VOC) Emissions from
Reactor Processes and Distillation Operations in Synthetic Organic
Chemical Manufacturing Industry (SOCMI) EPA-450/4-91-031, August 1993.
    2. Control of VOC Emissions from Equipment Leaks from Natural Gas/
Gasoline Processing Plants EPA-450/3-83-007, December 1983.
    3. Control of VOC Leaks from Synthetic Organic Chemical Polymer and
Resin Manufacturing Equipment EPA-450/3-83-006, March 1984.
    4. Control of VOC Emissions from Air Oxidation Processes in SOCMI,
EPA-450/3-84-015, December 1984.
    EPA has determined that today's correcting action falls under the
``good cause'' exemption in section 553(b)(3)(B) of the Administrative
Procedure Act (APA) which, upon finding ``good cause,'' authorizes
agencies to dispense with public participation where public notice and
comment procedures are impracticable, unnecessary, or contrary to the
public interest. Public notice and comment for this action is
unnecessary because today's action simply makes a correction to a
previous inadvertent omission in the non-regulatory text of the CFR.
EPA previously provided for public notice and comment on the
substantive SIP revision approval. In addition, EPA does not believe
the public would be interested in commenting on the correction prior to
this action being finalized, since this correction action does not
change the conclusion of EPA's analysis or action addressing approval
of the Georgia RACT rules.
    EPA also finds that there is good cause under APA section 553(d)(3)
for this correction to become effective on the date of publication of
this action. Section 553(d)(3) of the APA allows an effective date less
than 30 days after publication ``as otherwise provided by the agency
for good cause found and published with the rule.'' 5 U.S.C. 553(d)(3).
The purpose of the 30-day waiting period prescribed in APA section
553(d)(3) is to give affected parties a reasonable time to adjust their
behavior and prepare before the final rule takes effect. Today's rule,
however, does not create any new regulatory requirements such that
affected parties would need time to prepare before the rule takes
effect. Rather, today's action simply corrects an inadvertent omission
in the CFR of a small portion of a SIP revision that EPA previously
substantively approved. For these

reasons, EPA finds good cause under APA section 553(d)(3) for this
correction to become effective on the date of publication of this
action.

Statutory and Executive Order Reviews

    Under Executive Order 12866 (58 FR 51735, October 4, 1993), this
action is not a ``significant regulatory action'' and therefore is not
subject to review by the Office of Management and Budget. For this
reason, this action is also not subject to Executive Order 13211,
``Actions Concerning Regulations That Significantly Affect Energy
Supply, Distribution, or Use'' (66 FR 28355, May 22, 2001). This action
merely explicitly lists the CTG source categories for which Georgia
made a negative declaration, is consistent with the substantive
revisions to the Georgia SIP described in the final approval of the
Georgia RACT SIP revisions and imposes no additional requirements
beyond those imposed by state law. Accordingly, the Administrator
certifies that this rule will not have a significant economic impact on
a substantial number of small entities under the Regulatory Flexibility
Act (5 U.S.C. 601 et seq.). Because this rule merely corrects an
inadvertent omission for the non-regulatory text of EPA's September 28,
2012, final rule addressing the approval of the Georgia's RACT SIP, and
does not impose any additional enforceable duty beyond that required by
state law, it does not contain any unfunded mandate or significantly or
uniquely affect small governments, as described in the Unfunded
Mandates Reform Act of 1995 (Public Law 104-4).
    This rule also does not have tribal implications because it will
not have a substantial direct effect on one or more Indian tribes, on
the relationship between the federal Government and Indian tribes, or
on the distribution of power and responsibilities between the federal
Government and Indian tribes, as specified by Executive Order 13175 (65
FR 67249, November 9, 2000). This rule also does not have Federalism
implications because it does not have substantial direct effects on the
states, on the relationship between the national government and the
states, or on the distribution of power and responsibilities among the
various levels of government, as specified in Executive Order 13132 (64
FR 43255, August 10, 1999). This rule merely corrects an inadvertent
omission for the non-regulatory text of EPA's September 28, 2012, final
rule addressing the approval of the Georgia RACT SIP, and does not
alter the relationship or the distribution of power and
responsibilities established in the CAA. This rule also is not subject
to Executive Order 13045 ``Protection of Children from Environmental
Health Risks and Safety Risks'' (62 FR 19885, April 23, 1997), because
it is not economically significant. In addition, this rule does not
involve technical standards, thus the requirements of section 12(d) of
the National Technology Transfer and Advancement Act of 1995 (15 U.S.C.
272 note) do not apply. This rule also does not impose an information
collection burden under the provisions of the Paperwork Reduction Act
of 1995 (44 U.S.C. 3501 et seq.).
    The Congressional Review Act, 5 U.S.C. section 801 et seq., as
added by the Small Business Regulatory Enforcement Fairness Act of
1996, generally provides that before a rule may take effect, the agency
promulgating the rule must submit a rule report, which includes a copy
of the rule, to each House of the Congress and to the Comptroller
General of the United States. EPA will submit a report containing this
rule and other required information to the U.S. Senate, the U.S. House
of Representatives, and the Comptroller General of the United States
prior to publication of the rule in the Federal Register. A major rule
cannot take effect until 60 days after it is published in the Federal
Register. This action is not a ``major rule'' as defined by 5 U.S.C.
804(2).

List of Subjects in 40 CFR Part 52

    Environmental protection, Air pollution control, Incorporation by
reference, Intergovernmental relations, Nitrogen dioxide, Ozone,
Reporting and recordkeeping requirements, Volatile organic compounds.

    Dated: March 7, 2013.
A. Stanley Meiburg,
Acting Regional Administrator, Region 4.
    40 CFR part 52 is amended as follows:

PART 52--[AMENDED]

0
1. The authority citation for part 52 continues to read as follows:

    Authority:  42 U.S.C. 7401 et seq.

Subpart L--Georgia

0
2. Section 52.570(e) is amended by adding new entries 38 through 41 to
the table in numerical order to read as follows:

Sec.  52.570  Identification of plan.

* * * * *
    (e) * * *

                                 EPA-Approved Georgia Non-Regulatory Provisions
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
                                     Applicable           State
   Name of nonregulatory SIP        geographic or    submittal date/  EPA approval           Explanation
           provision             nonattainment area  effective date       date
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

                                                  * * * * * * *
38. Negative Declaration for     Atlanta 1997 8-         10/21/2009      09/28/2013  ...........................
 Control of VOC Emissions from    Hour Ozone
 Reactor Processes and            Nonattainment
 Distillation Operations in       Area.
 Synthetic Organic Chemical
 Manufacturing Industry (SOCMI)
 EPA-450/4-91-031, August 1993.
39. Negative Declaration for     Atlanta 1997 8-         10/21/2009      09/28/2013  ...........................
 Control of VOC Emissions from    Hour Ozone
 Equipment Leaks from Natural     Nonattainment
 Gas/Gasoline Processing Plants   Area.
 EPA-450/3-83-007, December
 1983.
40. Negative Declaration for     Atlanta 1997 8-         10/21/2009      09/28/2013  ...........................
 Control of VOC Leaks from        Hour Ozone
 Synthetic Organic Chemical       Nonattainment
 Polymer and Resin                Area.
 Manufacturing Equipment EPA-
 450/3-83-006, March 1984.

41. Negative Declaration for     Atlanta 1997 8-         10/21/2009      09/28/2013  ...........................
 Control of VOC Emissions from    Hour Ozone
 Air Oxidation Processes in       Nonattainment
 Synthetic Organic Chemical       Area.
 Manufacturing Industry
 (SOCMI), EPA-450/3-84-015,
 December 1984.
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

[FR Doc. 2013-06076 Filed 3-18-13; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6560-50-P


[Federal Register Volume 86, Number 1 (Monday, January 4, 2021)]
[Notices]
[Pages 88-89]
[FR Doc No: 2020-29078]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY

[EPA-HQ-OGC-2020-0652; FRL-10019-16-OGC]

Proposed Consent Decree, Clean Air Act Citizen Suit

AGENCY: Environmental Protection Agency (EPA).

ACTION: Notice of proposed consent decree; request for public comment.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: In accordance with the Clean Air Act, as amended (CAA or the
Act), notice is given of a proposed consent decree in United Refining
Co. v. Wheeler, No. 20-cv-1956 (D.D.C.). On July 7, 2020, United
Refining Co. (United) filed a complaint in the United States District
Court for the District of Columbia alleging that the Environmental
Protection Agency (EPA or the Agency) failed to perform a certain non-
discretionary duty. United alleges that EPA failed to take final action
on its petition for a small refinery hardship exemption from its 2019
obligations under the Renewable Fuel Standards (RFS) program
established by the Clean Air Act. The proposed consent decree would
establish a deadline for EPA to act on the petition.

DATES: Written comments on the proposed consent decree must be received
by February 3, 2021.

ADDRESSES: Submit your comments, identified by Docket ID No. EPA-HQ-
OGC-2020-0652, online at https://www.regulations.gov (EPA's preferred
method). Follow the online instructions for submitting comments.
    Instructions: All submissions received must include the Docket ID
number for this action. Comments received may be posted without change
to https://www.regulations.gov/, including any personal information
provided. For detailed instructions on sending comments and additional
information on the rulemaking process, see the ``Additional Information
about Commenting on the Proposed Consent Decree'' heading under the
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION section of this document. Out of an abundance
of caution for members of the public and our staff, the EPA Docket
Center and Reading Room are closed to the public, with limited
exceptions, to reduce the risk of transmitting COVID-19. Our Docket
Center staff will continue to provide remote customer service via
email, phone, and webform. We encourage the public to submit comments
via https://www.regulations.gov, as there may be a delay in processing
mail and faxes.

Hand-deliveries and couriers may be received by scheduled appointment
only. For further information on EPA Docket Center services and the
current status, please visit us online at https://www.epa.gov/dockets.
    EPA continues to carefully and continuously monitor information
from the CDC, local area health departments, and our federal partners
so that we can respond rapidly as conditions change regarding COVID-19.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Meredith G. Miller, Air and Radiation
Law Office (2344A), Office of General Counsel, U.S. Environmental
Protection Agency, 1200 Pennsylvania Ave. NW, Washington, DC 20460;
telephone<PHONE_NUMBER>; email address<EMAIL_ADDRESS>
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

I. Obtaining a Copy of the Proposed Consent Decree

    The official public docket for this action (identified by Docket ID
No. EPA-HQ-OGC-2020-0652) contains a copy of the proposed consent
decree.
    The electronic version of the public docket for this action
contains a copy of the proposed consent decree, and is available
through https://www.regulations.gov. You may use https://www.regulations.gov to submit or view public comments, access the index
listing of the contents of the official public docket, and access those
documents in the public docket that are available electronically. Once
in the system, key in the appropriate docket identification number then
select ``search.''

II. Additional Information About the Proposed Consent Decree

    The proposed consent decree would require EPA to act on United's
petition for a small refinery hardship exemption from its 2019 RFS
obligations. On or about December 18, 2019, United submitted its
petition seeking a small refinery exemption from the RFS program
pursuant to CAA section 211(o). 42 U.S.C. 7545(o). CAA section
211(o)(9)(B)(iii) provides a 90-day deadline for the Administrator to
act on such petitions. 42 U.S.C. 211(o)(9)(B)(iii). EPA has not acted
on the petition. The proposed consent decree would require the
Administrator to either grant or deny United's petition for a 2019
small refinery hardship exemption no later than February 19, 2021.
    In accordance with section 113(g) of the CAA, for a period of
thirty (30) days following the date of publication of this document,
the Agency will accept written comments relating to the proposed
consent decree. EPA or the Department of Justice may withdraw or
withhold consent to the proposed consent decree if the comments
disclose facts or considerations that indicate that such consent is
inappropriate, improper, inadequate, or inconsistent with the
requirements of the Act.

III. Additional Information About Commenting on the Proposed Consent
Decree

    Submit your comments, identified by Docket ID No. EPA-HQ-OGC-2020-
0652, via https://www.regulations.gov. Once submitted, comments cannot
be edited or removed from this docket. EPA may publish any comment
received to its public docket. Do not submit to EPA's docket at https://www.regulations.gov any information you consider to be Confidential
Business Information (CBI) or other information whose disclosure is
restricted by statute. Multimedia submissions (audio, video, etc.) must
be accompanied by a written comment. The written comment is considered
the official comment and should include discussion of all points you
wish to make. EPA will generally not consider comments or comment
contents located outside of the primary submission (i.e., on the web,
cloud, or other file sharing system). For additional submission
methods, the full EPA public comment policy, information about CBI or
multimedia submissions, and general guidance on making effective
comments, please visit https://www.epa.gov/dockets/commenting-epa-dockets. For additional information about submitting information
identified as CBI, please contact the person listed in the FOR FURTHER
INFORMATION CONTACT section of this document. Note that written
comments containing CBI and submitted by mail may be delayed and
deliveries or couriers will be received by scheduled appointment only.
    If you submit an electronic comment, EPA recommends that you
include your name, mailing address, and an email address or other
contact information in the body of your comment. This ensures that you
can be identified as the submitter of the comment and allows EPA to
contact you in case EPA cannot read your comment due to technical
difficulties or needs further information on the substance of your
comment. Any identifying or contact information provided in the body of
a comment will be included as part of the comment that is placed in the
official public docket and made available in EPA's electronic public
docket. If EPA cannot read your comment due to technical difficulties
and cannot contact you for clarification, EPA may not be able to
consider your comment.
    Use of the https://www.regulations.gov website to submit comments
to EPA electronically is EPA's preferred method for receiving comments.
The electronic public docket system is an ``anonymous access'' system,
which means EPA will not know your identity, email address, or other
contact information unless you provide it in the body of your comment.
    Please ensure that your comments are submitted within the specified
comment period. Comments received after the close of the comment period
will be marked ``late.'' EPA is not required to consider these late
comments.

Gautam Srinivasan,
Associate General Counsel.
[FR Doc. 2020-29078 Filed 12-31-20; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6560-50-P


[Federal Register: April 25, 2006 (Volume 71, Number 79)]
[Notices]
[Page 23977-23978]
[DOCID:fr25ap06-131]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

[Release No. 34-53673; File No. SR-Phlx-2005-80]

Self-Regulatory Organizations; Philadelphia Stock Exchange, Inc.;
Order Granting Accelerated Approval to a Proposed Rule Change and
Amendment No. 1 Thereto Relating to the Automated Delivery and Handling
of Stop and Stop-Limit Orders

April 18, 2006.

I. Introduction

    On December 15, 2005, the Philadelphia Stock Exchange, Inc.
(``Phlx'' or ``Exchange'') filed with the Securities and Exchange
Commission (``Commission'') pursuant to section 19(b)(1) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (``Act'') \1\ and Rule 19b-4
thereunder,\2\ the proposed rule change relating to the automated
delivery and handling of stop and stop-limit orders. On March 6, 2006,
Phlx filed Amendment No. 1 to the proposed rule change with the
Commission.\3\ The proposed rule change, as amended, was published for
comment in the Federal Register on March 27, 2006.\4\ The Commission
received no comments on the proposal. This order approves the proposed
rule change, as amended, on an accelerated basis.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \1\ 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(l).
    \2\ 17 CFR 240.19b-4.
    \3\ Amendment No. 1, which replaced the original filing in its
entirety, added clarifying language to the description of the
proposed rule change and adopted a definition of ``agency order'' in
Phlx Rule 1080(b)(i)(A).
    \4\ See Securities Exchange Act Release No. 53514 (March 17,
2006), 71 FR 15240 (March 27, 2006).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

II. Description of the Proposal

    The Phlx proposed to amend Phlx Rules 1066(c)(1) and 1080(b)(i)(A)
and (C), and to delete Options Floor Procedure Advices (``OFPAs'') A-5
and A-6, to permit customer and off-floor broker-dealer stop \5\ and
stop-limit \6\ orders in options to be delivered via the Exchange's
Automated Options Market (``AUTOM'') System \7\ and to be handled
electronically. The Exchange also proposed to amend Phlx Rule
1080(b)(i)(A) to include the definition of ``agency order'' in the rule
and to delete certain provisions in the Exchange's rules that were
either redundant or no longer practical.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \5\ A stop order is a contingency order to buy or sell when the
market for a particular option contract reaches a specified price. A
stop order to buy becomes a market order when the option contract
trades or is bid at or above the stop price. A stop order to sell
becomes a market order when the option contract trades or is offered
at or below the stop price. See Phlx Rule 1066(c)(1).
    \6\ A stop-limit order is a contingency order to buy or sell at
a limited price when the market for a particular option contract
reaches a specified price. A stop limit order to buy becomes a limit
order executable at the limit price or better when the option
contract trades or is bid at or above the stop-limit price. A stop
limit order to sell becomes a limit order executable at the limit
price or better when the option contract trades or is offered at or
below the stop limit price. See id.
    \7\ See Phlx Rule 1080.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

III. Discussion

    The Commission has reviewed the proposed rule change, as amended,
and finds that it is consistent with the requirements of the Act and
the rules and regulations thereunder applicable to a national
securities exchange.\8\ In particular, the Commission finds the

proposed rule change, as amended, is consistent with section 6(b)(5) of
the Act \9\ which, among other things, requires that the rules of a
national securities exchange be designed to promote just and equitable
principles of trade, to foster cooperation and coordination with
persons engaged in regulating securities transactions, to remove
impediments to perfect the mechanism of a free and open market and a
national market system and, in general, to protect investors and the
public interest.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \8\ In approving this proposed rule change, the Commission has
considered the proposed rule's impact on efficiency, competition,
and capital formation. See 15 U.S.C. 78c(f).
    \9\ 15 U.S.C. 78f(b)(5).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    The proposal is intended to increase the number of orders handled
electronically and establish rules that permit the electronic delivery
and handling of stop and stop-limit orders via the Exchange's AUTOM
System. The Commission notes that increasing the number of orders
handled electronically should increase the efficiency and accuracy of
the handling of such orders. In addition, the proposal is substantially
similar to a rule currently in effect on the International Securities
Exchange, Inc.\10\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \10\ See Securities Exchange Act Release No. 48811 (November 20,
2003), 68 FR 66909 (November 28, 2003).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    The Exchange requests accelerated approval of the proposal to
permit implementation of the functionality for stop and stop-limit
orders in AUTOM as soon as possible. Therefore, the Exchange requests
that the Commission find good cause for approving the proposal, as
amended, prior to the thirtieth day after the date of publication of
notice of filing thereof in the Federal Register.
    The Commission notes that the proposal and Amendment No. 1 were
noticed for the full 21-day comment period, and the Commission received
no comments regarding the proposal, as amended. As discussed more fully
above, the Commission believes that the proposed rule change should
permit the Exchange to handle stop orders and stop limit orders more
efficiently. Accordingly, the Commission finds good cause pursuant to
section 19(b)(2) of the Act \11\ to approve the proposed rule change,
as amended, prior to the thirtieth day after the date of publication of
notice of filing thereof in the Federal Register.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \11\ 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(2).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

IV. Conclusion

    It is therefore ordered, pursuant to section 19(b)(2) of the
Act,\12\ that the proposed rule change (File No. SR-Phlx-2005-80), as
amended, be and hereby is, approved on an accelerated basis.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \12\ 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(2).
    \13\ 17 CFR 200.30-3(a)(12).

    For the Commission, by the Division of Market Regulation,
pursuant to delegated authority.\13\
Nancy M. Morris,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. E6-6147 Filed 4-24-06; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 8010-01-P