[Federal Register Volume 82, Number 115 (Friday, June 16, 2017)]
[Proposed Rules]
[Pages 27631-27634]
[FR Doc No: 2017-12252]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION

Federal Aviation Administration

14 CFR Part 39

[Docket No. FAA-2017-0555; Directorate Identifier 2016-NM-183-AD]
RIN 2120-AA64

Airworthiness Directives; Airbus Defense and Space S.A. (Formerly
Known as Construcciones Aeronauticas, S.A.) Airplanes

AGENCY: Federal Aviation Administration (FAA), DOT.

ACTION: Notice of proposed rulemaking (NPRM).

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: We propose to supersede Airworthiness Directive (AD) 2013-02-
12, which applies to all EADS CASA (now Airbus Defense and Space S.A.)
Model CN-235, CN-235-100, CN-235-200, and CN-235-300 airplanes. AD
2013-02-12 currently requires a one-time inspection to identify the
correct polarity for each pair of electrical connectors on each engine
fire extinguisher cartridge, and repair if necessary. Since we issued
AD 2013-02-12, we have determined it is necessary to add a requirement
for modifying the installation of the fire extinguisher circuit
harness. This proposed AD would continue to require identifying the
correct polarity of each pair of electrical connectors of the affected
engine fire extinguisher cartridge, and doing a repair if necessary.
This proposed AD would also require modifying the installation of the
fire extinguisher circuit harnesses. We are proposing this AD to
address the unsafe condition on these products.

DATES: We must receive comments on this proposed AD by July 31, 2017.

ADDRESSES: You may send comments, using the procedures found in 14 CFR
11.43 and 11.45, by any of the following methods:
     Federal eRulemaking Portal: Go to http://www.regulations.gov. Follow the instructions for submitting comments.
     Fax:<PHONE_NUMBER>.
     Mail: U.S. Department of Transportation, Docket
Operations, M-30, West Building Ground Floor, Room W12-140, 1200 New
Jersey Avenue SE., Washington, DC 20590.
     Hand Delivery: Deliver to Mail address above between 9
a.m. and 5 p.m., Monday through Friday, except Federal holidays.
    For service information identified in this NPRM, contact Airbus
Defense and Space Services/Engineering Support, Avenida de
Arag[oacute]n 404, 28022 Madrid, Spain; telephone +34 91 585 55 84; fax
+34 91 585 31 27; email<EMAIL_ADDRESS>You may view
this referenced service information at the FAA, Transport Airplane
Directorate, 1601 Lind Avenue SW., Renton, WA. For information on the
availability of this material at the FAA, call<PHONE_NUMBER>.

Examining the AD Docket

    You may examine the AD docket on the Internet at http://www.regulations.gov by searching for and locating Docket No. FAA-2017-
0555; or in person at the Docket Management Facility between 9 a.m. and
5 p.m., Monday through Friday, except Federal holidays. The AD docket
contains this proposed AD, the regulatory evaluation, any comments
received, and other information. The street address for the Docket
Operations office (telephone<PHONE_NUMBER>) is in the ADDRESSES section.
Comments will be available in the AD docket shortly after receipt.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Shahram Daneshmandi, Aerospace
Engineer, International Branch, ANM-116, Transport Airplane
Directorate, FAA, 1601 Lind Avenue SW., Renton, WA 98057-3356;
telephone<PHONE_NUMBER>; fax<PHONE_NUMBER>.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

Comments Invited

    We invite you to send any written relevant data, views, or
arguments about this proposed AD. Send your comments to an address
listed under the ADDRESSES section. Include ``Docket No. FAA-2017-0555;
Directorate Identifier 2016-NM-183-AD'' at the beginning of your
comments. We specifically invite comments on the overall regulatory,
economic, environmental, and energy aspects of this proposed AD. We
will consider all comments received by the closing date and may amend
this proposed AD based on those comments.
    We will post all comments we receive, without change, to http://www.regulations.gov, including any personal information you provide. We
will also post a report summarizing each substantive verbal contact we
receive about this proposed AD.

Discussion

    On January 23, 2013, we issued AD 2013-02-12, Amendment 39-17333
(78 FR 7262, February 1, 2013) (``AD 2013-02-12''), for all EADS CASA
(now Airbus Defense and Space S.A.) Model CN-235, CN-235-100, CN-235-
200, and CN-235-300 airplanes. AD 2013-02-12 was prompted by reports of
incorrect electrical polarity connections on engine fire extinguishing
discharge cartridges. AD 2013-02-12 requires a one-time inspection to
identify the correct polarity for each pair of electrical connectors on
each engine fire extinguisher cartridge, and repair if necessary. We
issued AD 2013-02-12 to detect and correct incorrect polarity
connections, which could prevent the actuation of the discharge
cartridge in case of automatic fire detection or manual initiation
during a potential engine fire, and could result in damage to the
airplane and injury to passengers.
    Since we issued AD 2013-02-12, a new modification for the
installation of the fire extinguisher circuit harness has been
developed by the manufacturer. Embodiment of this modification
introduces a design solution that avoids maintenance errors during
connecting and reconnecting of the affected fire extinguisher circuit
harness after accomplishment of maintenance tasks or functional tests.
    The European Aviation Safety Agency (EASA), which is the Technical
Agent for the Member States of the European Union, has issued EASA AD
2016-0201, dated October 11, 2016 (referred to after this as the
Mandatory Continuing Airworthiness Information, or ``the MCAI''), to
correct an unsafe condition for all Airbus Defense and Space S.A. Model
CN-235, CN-235-100, CN-235-200, and CN-235-300 airplanes. The MCAI
states:

    Reports have been received of finding wrong electrical polarity
connections of engine fire extinguishing discharge cartridges on
CASA CN-235 aeroplanes. The results of the subsequent investigation
showed that the incorrect discharge cartridge assembly was caused by
production line errors.
    This condition, if not detected and corrected, could prevent the
actuation of the discharge cartridge in case of automatic fire
detection or manual initiation in case of engine fire, possibly
resulting in damage to the aeroplane and injury to occupants.
    To address this potentially unsafe condition, EADS CASA (Airbus
Military) developed instructions to identify erroneous wiring
polarity installation and EASA issued AD 2012-0045 [which correlates
to FAA AD 2013-02-12, Amendment 39-17333 (78 FR 7262, February 1,
2013)] to require a one-time inspection to verify proper electrical
polarity of wiring of each engine fire extinguisher discharge
cartridge and, depending on findings, corrective action.
    Since [EASA] AD 2012-0045 was issued, Airbus Defence and Space
(D&S) developed modification of the installation of the fire
extinguisher circuit harnesses, available for in-service
installation through Service Bulletin (SB) SB-235-26-0005, which
represents technical solution for an unsafe condition addressed by
[EASA] AD 2012-0045 for those aeroplanes. Embodiment of this
modification introduces a design solution that avoids maintenance
errors during (re)connecting of the affected fire extinguisher
circuit harnesses after accomplishment of maintenance tasks or
functional tests.
    For the reasons described above, this [EASA] AD retains the
requirements of EASA AD 2012-0045, which is superseded and requires
identification of the correct polarity after each maintenance action
involving (re)connecting of the engine fire extinguisher cartridge
electrical connector. This [EASA] AD also requires modification of
the affected fire extinguisher circuit harnesses.

    You may examine the MCAI in the AD docket on the Internet at http://www.regulations.gov by searching for and locating Docket No. FAA-2017-
0555.

Related Service Information Under 1 CFR Part 51

    Airbus Defense and Space S.A. has issued EADS CASA Service Bulletin
SB-235-26-0005, dated July 9, 2014. The service information describes
procedures for modifying the installation of the fire extinguisher
circuit harnesses.
    Airbus Defense and Space S.A. has also issued Airbus Military All
Operator Letter (AOL) 235-020, Revision 1, dated November 12, 2013. The
service information describes procedures for identifying the correct
polarity of each pair of electrical connectors of the affected engine
fire extinguisher cartridge, and repairing the erroneous wiring
polarity if necessary.
    This service information is reasonably available because the
interested parties have access to it through their normal course of
business or by the means identified in the ADDRESSES section.

FAA's Determination and Requirements of This Proposed AD

    This product has been approved by the aviation authority of another

country, and is approved for operation in the United States. Pursuant
to our bilateral agreement with the State of Design Authority, we have
been notified of the unsafe condition described in the MCAI and service
information referenced above. We are proposing this AD because we
evaluated all pertinent information and determined an unsafe condition
exists and is likely to exist or develop on other products of the same
type design.

Costs of Compliance

    We estimate that this proposed AD affects 12 airplanes of U.S.
registry.
    The actions required by AD 2013-02-12, and retained in this
proposed AD take about 4 work-hours per product, at an average labor
rate of $85 per work-hour. Required parts cost about $0 per product.
Based on these figures, the estimated cost of the actions that are
required by AD 2013-02-12 is $340 per product.
    We also estimate that it would take about 11 work-hours per product
to comply with the basic requirements of this proposed AD. The average
labor rate is $85 per work-hour. Required parts would cost about $3,280
per product. Based on these figures, we estimate the cost of this
proposed AD on U.S. operators to be about $50,580 or $4,215 per
product.
    In addition, we estimate that any necessary follow-on actions would
take about 1 work-hour and require parts costing $0, for a cost of $85
per product. We have no way of determining the number of aircraft that
might need this action.

Authority for This Rulemaking

    Title 49 of the United States Code specifies the FAA's authority to
issue rules on aviation safety. Subtitle I, section 106, describes the
authority of the FAA Administrator. ``Subtitle VII: Aviation
Programs,'' describes in more detail the scope of the Agency's
authority.
    We are issuing this rulemaking under the authority described in
``Subtitle VII, Part A, Subpart III, Section 44701: General
requirements.'' Under that section, Congress charges the FAA with
promoting safe flight of civil aircraft in air commerce by prescribing
regulations for practices, methods, and procedures the Administrator
finds necessary for safety in air commerce. This regulation is within
the scope of that authority because it addresses an unsafe condition
that is likely to exist or develop on products identified in this
rulemaking action.

Regulatory Findings

    We determined that this proposed AD would not have federalism
implications under Executive Order 13132. This proposed AD would not
have a substantial direct effect on the States, on the relationship
between the national Government and the States, or on the distribution
of power and responsibilities among the various levels of government.
    For the reasons discussed above, I certify this proposed
regulation:
    1. Is not a ``significant regulatory action'' under Executive Order
12866;
    2. Is not a ``significant rule'' under the DOT Regulatory Policies
and Procedures (44 FR 11034, February 26, 1979);
    3. Will not affect intrastate aviation in Alaska; and
    4. Will not have a significant economic impact, positive or
negative, on a substantial number of small entities under the criteria
of the Regulatory Flexibility Act.

List of Subjects in 14 CFR Part 39

    Air transportation, Aircraft, Aviation safety, Incorporation by
reference, Safety.

The Proposed Amendment

    Accordingly, under the authority delegated to me by the
Administrator, the FAA proposes to amend 14 CFR part 39 as follows:

PART 39--AIRWORTHINESS DIRECTIVES

0
1. The authority citation for part 39 continues to read as follows:

    Authority:  49 U.S.C. 106(g), 40113, 44701.

Sec.  39.13  [Amended]

0
2. The FAA amends Sec.  39.13 by removing Airworthiness Directive (AD)
2013-02-12, Amendment 39-17333 (78 FR 7262, February 1, 2013), and
adding the following new AD:

Airbus Defense and Space S.A. (Formerly Known as Construcciones
Aeronauticas, S.A.): Docket No. FAA-2017-0555; Directorate
Identifier 2016-NM-183-AD.

(a) Comments Due Date

    We must receive comments by July 31, 2017.

(b) Affected ADs

    This AD replaces AD 2013-02-12, Amendment 39-17333 (78 FR 7262,
February 1, 2013) (``AD 2013-02-12'').

(c) Applicability

    This AD applies to all Airbus Defense and Space S.A. (formerly
known as Construcciones Aeronauticas, S.A.) Model CN-235, CN-235-
100, CN-235-200, and CN-235-300 airplanes, certificated in any
category.

(d) Subject

    Air Transport Association (ATA) of America Code 26, Fire
protection.

(e) Reason

    This AD was prompted by reports of incorrect electrical polarity
connections on engine fire extinguishing discharge cartridges. We
are issuing this AD to detect and correct incorrect polarity
connections, which could prevent the actuation of the discharge
cartridge in case of automatic fire detection or manual initiation
during a potential engine fire, and could result in damage to the
airplane and injury to passengers.

(f) Compliance

    Comply with this AD within the compliance times specified,
unless already done.

(g) Retained Inspection, With Revised Service Information

    This paragraph restates the requirements of paragraph (g) of AD
2013-02-12, with revised service information. Within 30 days after
March 8, 2013 (the effective date of AD 2013-02-12), do a one-time
inspection to identify the correct polarity for each pair of
electrical connectors on each engine fire extinguisher cartridge, in
accordance with the Instructions of Airbus Military All Operator
Letter 235-020, dated March 9, 2012; or Airbus Military All Operator
Letter 235-020, Revision 1, dated November 12, 2013.

(h) New Requirement of This AD: Repetitive Inspections

    As of 30 days after the effective date of this AD: Before
further flight after accomplishing each maintenance task involving
disconnection or reconnection of an electrical connector of an
engine fire extinguisher cartridge, determine the polarity of each
pair of electrical connectors of the affected engine fire
extinguisher cartridge, in accordance with the Instructions of
Airbus Military All Operator Letter (AOL) 235-020, Revision 1, dated
November 12, 2013.

(i) New Requirement of This AD: Corrective Action

    If, during any inspection required by paragraph (g) or (h) of
this AD, erroneous wiring polarity installation is detected, before
further flight, repair the erroneous polarity in accordance with a
method approved by the Manager, International Branch, ANM-116,
Transport Airplane Directorate, FAA; or the European Aviation Safety
Agency (EASA); or EADS CASA's EASA Design Organization Approval
(DOA).

(j) New Requirement of This AD: Modification

    Within 24 months after the effective date of this AD: Modify the
installation of the fire extinguisher circuit harnesses, in
accordance with the Accomplishment Instructions of EADS CASA Service
Bulletin SB-235-26-0005, dated July 9, 2014.

(k) Terminating Action

    The modification required in paragraph (j) of this AD terminates
the actions required in paragraphs (g) and (h) of this AD.

(l) Other FAA AD Provisions

    The following provisions also apply to this AD:
    (1) Alternative Methods of Compliance (AMOCs): The Manager,
International Branch, ANM-116, Transport Airplane Directorate, FAA,
has the authority to approve AMOCs for this AD, if requested using
the procedures found in 14 CFR 39.19. In accordance with 14 CFR
39.19, send your request to your principal inspector or local Flight
Standards District Office, as appropriate. If sending information
directly to the International Branch, send it to the attention of
the person identified in paragraph (m)(2) of this AD. Information
may be emailed to<EMAIL_ADDRESS>Before using any
approved AMOC, notify your appropriate principal inspector, or
lacking a principal inspector, the manager of the local flight
standards district office/certificate holding district office.
    (2) Contacting the Manufacturer: As of the effective date of
this AD, for any requirement in this AD to obtain corrective actions
from a manufacturer, the action must be accomplished using a method
approved by the Manager, International Branch, ANM-116, Transport
Airplane Directorate, FAA; or the EASA; or EADS CASA's EASA DOA. If
approved by the DOA, the approval must include the DOA-authorized
signature.

(m) Related Information

    (1) Refer to Mandatory Continuing Airworthiness Information
(MCAI) EASA AD 2016-0201, dated October 11, 2016, for related
information. This MCAI may be found in the AD docket on the Internet
at http://www.regulations.gov by searching for and locating Docket
No. FAA-2017-0555.
    (2) For more information about this AD, contact Shahram
Daneshmandi, Aerospace Engineer, International Branch, ANM-116,
Transport Airplane Directorate, FAA, 1601 Lind Avenue SW., Renton,
WA 98057-3356; telephone<PHONE_NUMBER>; fax<PHONE_NUMBER>.
    (3) For service information identified in this AD, contact
Airbus Defense and Space Services/Engineering Support, Avenida de
Arag[oacute]n 404, 28022 Madrid, Spain; telephone +34 91 585 55 84;
fax +34 91 585 31 27; email<EMAIL_ADDRESS>You may
view this service information at the FAA, Transport Airplane
Directorate, 1601 Lind Avenue SW., Renton, WA. For information on
the availability of this material at the FAA, call<PHONE_NUMBER>.

    Issued in Renton, Washington, on June 6, 2017.
Michael Kaszycki,
Acting Manager, Transport Airplane Directorate, Aircraft Certification
Service.
[FR Doc. 2017-12252 Filed 6-15-17; 8:45 am]
 BILLING CODE 4910-13-P


                          SUPPORTING STATEMENT FOR AN
                     INFORMATION COLLECTION REQUEST (ICR)

1.	IDENTIFICATION OF THE INFORMATION COLLECTION

      1(a)  	Title of the Information Collection

      TITLE:  Foreign Purchaser Acknowledgment Statement of Unregistered Pesticides
      EPA No.: 0161.14
      OMB No.: 2070-0027
      Docket ID No.: EPA-HQ-OPP-0266

      1(b) 	Short Characterization/Abstract

      This information collection request (ICR) addresses the information collection activities associated with the requirement that the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) provide notice to foreign purchasers of unregistered pesticides exported from the United States that the pesticide product cannot be sold in the United States.  Section 17(a)(2) of the Federal Insecticide, Fungicide, and Rodenticide Act (FIFRA) (Attachment A) requires an exporter of any pesticide not registered under FIFRA section 3 or sold under FIFRA section 6(a)(1) to obtain a signed statement from the foreign purchaser acknowledging that the purchaser is aware that the pesticide is not registered for use in, and cannot be sold in, the United States.  A copy of this statement, which is known as the Foreign Purchaser Acknowledgement Statement, or FPAS, must be transmitted to the Designated National Authority or appropriate official of the government in the importing country. This information is submitted in the form of annual or per-shipment statements to EPA, which maintains original records and transmits copies, along with an explanatory letter, to appropriate government officials of the countries that are importing the pesticide.

	In addition to the export notification for unregistered pesticides, FIFRA requires that all exported pesticides include appropriate labeling. There are different requirements for registered and unregistered products.  Export labeling requirements meet the definition of third-party notification.  In the interests of consolidating various related information collection requests, this ICR includes burden estimates for the FPAS requirement for unregistered pesticides, as well as the labeling requirement for all exported pesticides, both registered and unregistered. These burdens have been consolidated in this ICR since the implementation of the 1993 pesticide export policy governing the export of pesticides, devices, and active ingredients used in producing pesticides.

 2.	NEED FOR AND USE OF THE COLLECTION

      2(a)	Need/Authority for the Collection

      This information is required to be submitted to EPA pursuant to FIFRA section 17(a)(2).  Regulations pertaining to exporting pesticides are contained in 40 CFR part 168, subpart D (Attachment B).
      2(b)	Practical Utility/Users of the Data

      Section 17(a)(2) of FIFRA requires all exporters of unregistered pesticides to obtain signed statements from their customers acknowledging that they are aware that their purchased products are not registered in the United States.  Hence, one use of this collection activity is in assuring that foreign purchasers of pesticides produced in the U.S. are aware of the products' U.S. registration status. When such statements are submitted to EPA, the Agency is provided with a record of foreign destinations of domestically produced unregistered products. This enables the Agency to assure that such products, which are produced in the U.S. but cannot be legally sold for use in the U.S., have been legally distributed.

      In addition, such statements are required by statute to be directed onward to the appropriate government officials in importing countries. Officials of foreign governments can use this information to verify that a specific pesticide product, that may or may not have an active ingredient that has been evaluated by EPA and approved for registration, has been exported to their country. The name and address of the purchaser in the importing country is included, enabling the government official to contact the purchaser directly, as appropriate. This information can be useful in countries which do not have the resources to maintain extensive import records or control systems.

3.	NON- DUPLICATION, CONSULTATIONS, AND OTHER COLLECTION CRITERIA

      3(a)	Non-duplication

      For every export of an unregistered pesticide, the U.S. exporter is required to obtain the FPAS prior to export and certify to EPA that export did not occur prior to the exporter's receipt of the FPAS.  The FPAS and the certification statement must then be transmitted to the governments of importing countries.  EPA is not aware of any other collection requirements for this information.

      EPA recognizes that repeated submissions of purchaser acknowledgment statements involving the same country, purchaser, and pesticide product would be duplicative and potentially burdensome. Individual submissions do, however, provide information on the total number of shipments to a specific purchaser. For this reason, EPA offers an option to exporters to either make individual submissions for every export, or to notify EPA upon the first export to the foreign purchaser and then provide an annual summary of all shipments no later than March 1 of the following calendar year. This reduces the redundancy that would be associated with the submission of identical acknowledgment statements by the same purchaser for the same product, while still providing EPA and foreign governments with information regarding the number of shipments in the previous calendar year.

      3(b)	Public Notice Required Prior to ICR Submission to OMB

      Pursuant to 5 CFR 1320.8(d), EPA published a notice in the Federal Register (83 FR 35273; July 25, 2018) (FRL-9979-93) announcing the proposal to renew this information collection activity, providing a 60-day public comment period.  The FR notice, supporting statement, and supporting attachments provided during the public comment period are available at http://www.regulations.gov using the docket identifier EPA-HQ-OPP-2018-0266.  EPA received one comment during the public comment period. This comment was anonymously submitted to the docket in response to our consultation request (discussed in next section). Therefore, the comments received are addressed in the consultations summary in Section 3(c).

      3(c)	Consultations

 	The Agency sent consultation requests, as required under 5 CFR 1320.8(d)(1), to nine representatives from private industries who interact with the Agency through the use of this information collection activity. EPA staff sought feedback on the burden estimates in the ICR, the clarity of instructions provided, and other questions pertaining to the requirements of the program. Two industry representatives responded to the Agency's request, one of which was submitted to the docket anonymously during the public comment period. The list of companies contacted, the questions asked, and the responses received are provided in Attachment C.

       In summary, EPA did not receive any comments from the respondents that would warrant changes to the burden and cost estimates presented during the first public comment period. One respondent stated that they believed the burden and labor costs have been accurately accounted, while the other respondent did not specifically respondent to the Agency's questions about its estimates. Therefore, EPA did not adjust its estimates as presented during the public comment period.

       In addition to questions specific to the estimated burden and labor costs in this supporting statement, EPA also asked questions concerning paper submissions and alternatives to paper submissions. One respondent stated that they preferred paper submissions over electronic options and that they did not believe electronic options would provide any benefits in terms of burden reduction or greater efficiency in compiling the information. The other respondent disagreed, indicating electronic alternatives to paper submissions would be a good idea and that they would be interested in electronic reporting as they would provide cost reductions (i.e., postage, mail, paper, ink) and greater efficiency.

      3(d)	Effects of Less Frequent Collection

      By offering the compliance option of annual reporting, EPA is offering a less frequent information submission to reduce the burden of per-shipment reporting.  Further reduction, i.e., to a one-time submission for the life of the product or otherwise to a frequency of less than once a year could compromise the accuracy of the data on the number of shipments exported to a particular purchaser in another country. Less frequent submission could also make it difficult for foreign governments to determine the regulatory status of imported pesticides.

      The annual summaries provide EPA with the ability to monitor compliance with the requirements of section 17(a). Currently, such records must be retained by exporters for only two years.  Since the summaries are submitted after the applicable year, less frequent submissions could result in the unavailability of records necessary to validate submissions.

      3(e)	General Guidelines

      In accordance with 5 CFR 1320.5(a)(iii)(E), federal agencies are required to indicate whether the proposed collection of information involves the use of automated, electronic, mechanical, or other technological collection techniques or other forms of information technology, e.g., permitting electronic submission of responses, and an explanation of the decision.

      Information collected under this ICR is currently submitted to EPA by mail. At this time, there are no practicable automated information submission techniques available under this information collection activity readily available to all pesticide purchasers and companies selling products world-wide that could enable the collection and submission of electronic signatures.

      Beginning in 2012, EPA began transmitting the FPAS electronically to Designated National Authorities (DNAs) identified by the Rotterdam Convention on Prior Informed Consent for Certain Hazardous Chemicals and Pesticides in International Trade where a valid email address exists and through mail where one does not. EPA has determined that sending the FPAS, which may contain FIFRA sensitive information, through the mail or via electronic media to foreign governments pursuant to FIFRA section 17 is acceptable for the following reasons: 1) The transmission is a limited, non-public disclosure required by FIFRA; 2) Foreign recipients are not subject to FIFRA security procedures in the FIFRA Information Security Manual; 3) The specific recipient in the government of the importing country is often not known. For both electronic or mail transmissions, the transmission includes a cover with the following language: "This Purchaser Acknowledgement Statement may contain information claimed as confidential. Please treat the statement according to appropriate national confidentiality laws and regulations."

      3(f)	Confidentiality

      EPA urges submitters to minimize the amount of claimed Confidential Business Information (CBI). All data and/or information submitted to the Agency under this information collection that may be claimed as trade secret, commercial or financial information will be protected from disclosure by EPA under FIFRA section 10.

      Based on "Non-confidentiality of Certain Information Submitted under Sections 7 and 17(a)(2) of FIFRA", 55 FR 1261 (January 12, 1990) and "Class Determination 1-91, Identity of Importing Country Under FIFRA Section 17(A)(2),", 58 FR 9062 (February 18, 1993),the following information will generally not be considered confidential: (a) The fact that a producer makes a registered or unregistered pesticide product; (b) the fact that an acknowledgement statement or other notice of export has been filed by an exporter; (c) the identity of the unregistered exported product; and, if applicable, the identity of the active ingredients of the pesticide; and (d) the identity of the importing country and the country or countries of final destination. According to statute, this same information must be reported to the government of the importing country.

      Exported research and development substances that fit the criteria set out in 40 CFR 168.75(b)(5) are not subject to the FPAS requirement, but are subject to the labeling requirement.   Confidential business information may be required to be submitted in the case where a business wishes to export an unregistered research pesticide product that does not fit the criteria of 168.75(b)(5).  EPA recognizes that the chemical identity of the research product may require protection as confidential business information, but believes that it is essential that the Agency nevertheless be able to accurately identify the nature of the product.  The identity of a product under research and development may be identified by use of identification codes which protect proprietary information.

      3(g)	Sensitive Questions

      No information of a sensitive nature is required to be submitted.

4. 	THE RESPONDENTS AND THE INFORMATION REQUESTED

      4(a)	Respondents - NAICS Codes

      Respondents affected by the collection activities under this ICR are individuals or entities that either manufacture and export pesticides or that reformulate or repackage and export pesticides. The North American Industrial Classification System (NAICS) code assigned to the parties responding to this information is as follows:

                                   Category
                                  NAICS code
                           Examples of potentially
                               affected entities
Chemical Manufacturing (3251, 3252, 3253, and 3259 only)
                                    3250A1
Individuals or entities engaged in activities related to the registration of a pesticide product.

      4(b)	Information Requested

      There are no forms for this activity. The EPA does not currently provide a template nor mandate the use of a common form. Therefore, the exporter must develop and use their own FPAS. In preparing the statement, the exporter is free to format the document in any manner as long as it includes all of the required information. The exporter must obtain the signed statement from the foreign purchaser before the pesticide can be shipped.

      While the EPA does not currently provide a form, the Agency is planning to develop a voluntary template that will help guide the process of submitting a FPAS. While this template is not yet available, EPA does not intend to make the use of the template mandatory, and exporters may continue to choose to develop an alternative format.

      (i)	Data items, including record keeping requirements

             Foreign Purchaser Acknowledgment Statement (FPAS)

      After determining that the product is subject to this requirement, the exporter must obtain a statement of the type described in item 4(b)(i) from the foreign purchaser of the pesticide product. This will normally require that the exporter provide the purchaser with a prepared statement for signature or with instructions that are adequate to ensure that the purchaser can prepare the statement.

      If the exporter anticipates making more than one shipment of the product to the purchaser in a given year, the exporter may elect to notify EPA only at the time of the first shipment and to choose to comply with the annual reporting option, which requires the submission of an annual summary of shipments of pesticides shipped to each purchaser.

The FPAS must contain the following information:
 Name and address of exporter.
 Name and address of foreign purchaser.
 Name of product and active ingredient.
 Statement that foreign purchaser is aware that the product is not registered for use in the United States and cannot be sold for use in the United States.
 If known, country of final destination of the exported shipment if different from country of import.
 Signature of foreign purchaser.
 Date that purchaser acknowledgment statement is signed by foreign purchaser.
 Certification that shipment did not occur prior to receipt of Purchaser Acknowledgment Statement.
 Exporter's signature.

Information required to be collected must be maintained pursuant to 40 CFR 168.85.

             Third Party Notification Requirements; Export Labeling

All exported registered pesticides must bear the EPA approved label and supplemental labeling options have been made to accommodate the importing country's requirements.  For unregistered pesticides, the following information must be included on the labels or labeling:
 EPA pesticide producing establishment number.
 Warning or caution statements.
 The statement "Not Registered for Use in the United States of America." The labels of all pesticides, devices, and active ingredients which are not registered for use in the United States under FIFRA section 3 must include this statement.
 The ingredient statement.
 Identity of parties.
 Weight or measure.
 Additional warning for highly toxic pesticides.
 Use classification statement.

             Multilingual labeling requirement

For both registered and unregistered products, the following labeling information must be multilingual:
 Warning and caution statements.
 Where applicable, the statement "Not registered for use in the United States of America."
 Ingredient statement.
 If the pesticide, device or active ingredient is highly toxic to humans, the skull and crossbones, the word "Poison," and a statement of practical treatment must appear on the label. The word "Poison" and the statement of practical treatment shall be in English and in an acceptable language of the country of import, and in an acceptable language in the country of final destination, if known or reasonably ascertainable.

      (ii)	Respondent Activities

      A. 	Submission of Foreign Purchaser Acknowledgment Statement

      The exporter is required to send a copy of the purchaser acknowledgment statement to EPA within 7 days of having shipped the pesticide, along with a signed statement that the shipment did not occur prior to receipt of the purchaser acknowledgment statement.  In addition, if the exporter chooses the annual reporting option, he or she must include a statement that the FPAS is for the first shipment of a pesticide to a particular purchaser in a specific country, and that the exporter will report this information annually. Where an exporter chooses to comply with the annual summary reporting option, a summary must be sent after the end of the calendar year which lists all shipments of a particular pesticide shipped to a particular foreign purchaser.  It is not required for the statement to be submitted to EPA in time to enable EPA to notify the importing country prior to arrival of the pesticide.

      Submission of a purchaser acknowledgment statement does not require the maintenance of any records unique to this section. All records needed to ensure and verify compliance with this requirement are required under section 8 of FIFRA. The recordkeeping burden related to this requirement is covered under another ICR.

      B.	Exemption of research and development pesticides

      Records supporting research and development status must include information regarding research intent of the shipment as well as information indicating knowledge that the quantity being shipped is consistent with research intent, as specified in 40 CFR 168.75 (b)(5). Persons claiming an exemption from the FPAS requirement for the export of research and development products must maintain records which support the R&D claim for each shipment so claimed.  In its policy, EPA has limited research claims only to shipments where the quantity shipped would be unlikely to support a commercial use. Thus, the company's records must be sufficient to support the claim that the quantity shipped is only sufficient for use within the limits of the policy. This can be done either in the form of communications received from the purchaser before or on the date of export or in the form of instructions sent to the purchaser before or on the date of export.

      Alternatively, the exporter may retain records which indicate that the quantity shipped is compatible with the claim that the amount can only be used as provided in the policy. Such information could include test results, literature citations, or other information which supports the claim.

      At the time of shipment, the exporter must maintain a record of the identity, amount, and date that the pesticide was shipped, the destination and purchaser, and the intended research use.  Most of this information is typically reflected on invoice/shipping records normally maintained for such products; records of pesticide shipments are already required to be maintained under FIFRA section 8. Other documentation supporting research use is generally available as typical business practice and should not impose additional burdens. Records of shipment and confirmation of research intent must be maintained and made available for inspection and copying by EPA for two years following the exportation of the pesticide.

       Export labeling

      Every exported pesticide, device, and active ingredient used in producing a pesticide must bear a label or labeling which meets the requirements of FIFRA section 17(a)(1).  This requirement applies to all such pesticides, devices, or active ingredients, regardless of whether the export is for commercial or research and development use. The specific requirements for the labeling of exported pesticides are described above. The required label statements may be met through either immediate container labels, or accompanying supplemental labeling, or through a combination of the two.

      EPA included supplemental labeling as an option to ease the compliance burden of this requirement. Supplemental labeling used to meet pesticide export label requirements must be attached to each smallest divisible shipping container of a given pesticide product.  In the case that cartons or drums are secured to a pallet such that they will not be separated from the pallet during shipment, it is permissible to attach supplemental labeling to the pallet load.  An example would be where a pallet of cartons has a wrapper (e.g., shrink-wrap) which contains all of the cartons on the pallet. However, if cartons or drums are loosely stacked on a pallet so that they could be separated during shipment, each drum or carton must be labeled.

      Exporters are also required to keep records of the product labeling, including the EPA registered labeling, any foreign labeling on or attached to the product when shipped, and as applicable, any supplemental labeling. The records are to be maintained in a manner that shows exactly which labels and labeling accompanied each shipment of a pesticide product to a foreign country.

5.	THE INFORMATION COLLECTED -- AGENCY ACTIVITIES, COLLECTION METHODOLOGY, AND INFORMATION MANAGEMENT

      5(a)	Agency Activities

      EPA is required to perform the following activities:
Respond to questions submitted by respondents.
Receive submissions of acknowledgment statements, certification statements, and annual summaries of shipments.
Review submissions for completeness.
Transmit submissions of acknowledgment statements and summaries of shipments to appropriate Designated National Authority or government official of the importing country or countries.
Maintain a file of all submissions.

 	EPA has automated the process of reviewing and filing submissions. The submissions are scanned and an electronic copy (pdf) is stored and saved. The Agency transmits the submissions of acknowledgment statements and summaries of shipments to appropriate government officials of importing countries electronically where a valid email address exists. The appropriate government official is the Designated National Authority (DNA) as identified by the Rotterdam Convention. In the rare instance that a DNA does not exist a contact is located by contacting the U.S. embassy abroad.

      5(b)	Collection Methodology and Management

      EPA maintains a file of all submitted acknowledgment statements. This file includes the following for each submitted statement:
 Copy of the purchaser acknowledgment statement and certification that shipment did not occur before receipt of statement by exporter.
 The EPA Mailing, and the date that the statement was forwarded to the appropriate government official or agency of the importing country.
 Copy of the estimate summary of the number of shipments to be made in association with that statement.

      5(c)	Small Entity Flexibility

	Under this reporting requirement, small entities must follow the same collection procedures as large companies. Both large and small entities may avail themselves of options which support alternative, flexible means of meeting specific requirements: 1. reporting options; 2. acquisition options, and 3. formatting options of required information. The Agency allows respondents the choice of reporting options; respondents can choose between annual estimates and summaries or per-shipment statements.  Respondents are also allowed flexibility in determining the method of obtaining the foreign purchaser acknowledgment statement. Finally, EPA provides flexibility in the formatting of submissions; small entities and occasional submitters may find it easier to comply with the requirements since they do not have to adhere to a specific format.

      5(d)	Collection Schedule

      Not applicable. The activity is conducted only as purchaser acknowledgment statements are received. There is no set schedule for the collection of this information.

6.	ESTIMATING THE BURDEN AND COST OF THE COLLECTION

      6(a)	Methodology for Estimating Respondent Cost
      The methodology for calculating the wage rates in this renewal of the ICR is consistent with the method for wage calculation for all ICRs managed by the Office of Pesticide Programs (OPP). This approach uses a transparent and consistent methodology employing publicly-available data to provide more accurate estimates and allow easy replication of the calculations. Wage estimates are based on 2017 wage data.
 	Methodology:	The methodology uses data on each sector and labor type for an Unloaded wage rate (hourly wage rate) and calculates the Loaded wage rate (unloaded wage rate + benefits), and the Fully loaded wage rate (loaded wage rate + overhead).  Fully loaded wage rates are used to calculate the Agency's staffing costs.

 	Unloaded Wage Rate: Wages are estimated for labor types (management, technical, and clerical) within applicable sectors. The Agency uses average wage data for the relevant sectors available in the National Industry-Specific Occupational Employment and Wage Estimates from the Bureau of Labor Statistics (BLS) at http://www.bls.gov/oes/current/oes_nat.htm.

 	Sectors: The specific North American Industry Classification System (NAICS) code and website for each sector is included in that sector's wage rate table. Within each sector, the wage data are provided by Standard Occupational Classification (SOC). The SOC system is used by Federal statistical agencies to classify workers into occupational categories for the purpose of collecting, calculating, or disseminating data (see http://www.bls.gov/oes/current/oes_stru.htm ).

 	Loaded Wage Rate: Unless stated otherwise, all benefits represent 46.5% of unloaded wage rates, based on benefits for all civilian non-farm workers, from http://www.bls.gov/news.release/ecec.t01.htm. However, if other sectors are listed for which 46.5% is not applicable; the applicable percentage will be stated.

 	Fully Loaded Wage Rate: We multiply the loaded wage rate by 50% (EPA guidelines 20-70%) to get overhead costs.  Attachments D and E contain worksheets providing the breakout of these costs.

	To derive the labor rates for this ICR, Agency economists estimated the wages for the management, technical, and clerical labor categories using the methodology cited above. The respondent costs for this renewal for managerial, technical and clerical rates are estimated at $127.82, $66.48 and $43.76 per hour, respectively. These labor rates are fully loaded and include benefits and overhead costs.

      6(b)	Estimating Respondent Burden and Cost

      The overall respondent burden hours associated with this collection total 16,660 hours per year.  This figure shows a decrease of 1,333 burden hours from the previous ICR. The difference is due to a decrease in the average number of respondents per calendar year from 2015-2017. Largely in part to an increase in the use of the annual summary option.

      The requirements to be fulfilled under this ICR consist of two parts: submission of the Foreign Purchaser Acknowledgment Statements (FPAS); and the third-party notification export labeling requirement.  The third party labeling requirement is further subdivided into labeling requirements for unregistered exported pesticide products and multilingual labeling requirements for registered exported pesticide products.

      (i)	Estimating the Respondent Burden and Cost of the FPAS Requirement

	This ICR renewal includes a respondent burden estimate of 2,940 hours for the FPAS requirement.  This figure is based on the average of 2,774 notices received annually from 2015-2017, and is a decrease of 250 notices from the previous renewal. Table 1 presents the calculations for total annual costs, a breakdown of the FPAS collection activities per respondent, and the expected labor mix required for each activity. Hourly wage rates for firms in NAICS 3250A1 were used to calculate respondent burden. The fully loaded hourly wage rates for management, technical, and clerical occupations for NAICS 3250A1 are $127.82, $66.48, and $43.76, respectively. See Attachment D for labor wage calculations. The total management, technical, and clerical hours are multiplied by the annual number of requests and by the fully loaded wage rates to get a total annual respondent cost of $183,239 for submitting FPAS forms.

      All records submitted under this information collection are either required to be kept under FIFRA Section 8 or are maintained in the normal course of business.  Exporters who feel that per-shipment submissions represent undue burden may choose to report annually. The per-shipment notification and annual summary requirements of this option are based on records of production and shipment records already required by regulations under FIFRA Section 8, so such information will be readily available to exporters, who may submit it without reformatting or special preparation. These annual submissions may be included as part of the annual submission of acknowledgment statements and thus would result in minimal burden.

Table 1.	Respondent Burden/Cost: Submission of FPAS
                              Collection Activity
                            Burden Hours (per year)
                                     Total

                                     Mgmt
                                  $127.82/hr
                                   Technical
                                   $66.48/hr
                                   Clerical
                                   $43.76/hr
                                     Hours
                                   Cost ($)
Read Regulations
                                     0.08
                                     0.00
                                     0.00
                                     0.08
                                                                          10.23
Plan Activities
                                     0.00
                                     0.08
                                     0.00
                                     0.08
                                                                           5.32
Gather Information
                                     0.00
                                     0.08
                                     0.00
                                     0.08
                                                                           5.32
Process, compile and reveal information
                                     0.00
                                     0.16
                                     0.00
                                     0.16
                                                                          10.64
Complete paperwork
                                     0.00
                                     0.25
                                     0.25
                                     0.50
                                                                          27.56
Record, disclose & display information
                                     0.00
                                     0.00
                                     0.08
                                     0.08
                                                                           3.50
Store, maintain and file information
                                     0.00
                                     0.00
                                     0.08
                                     0.08
                                                                           3.50
TOTAL
                                     0.08
                                     0.57
                                     0.41
                                     1.06
                                                                          66.06
ANNUAL BURDEN:	1.06 hrs (64 minutes) X 2,774 statements = 2,940 hours per year
ANNUAL COSTS: 	$66.506X 2,774 responses = $183,239 per year
[1] Hourly wages rates are fully loaded wage rates based on NAICS 3250A1  -  Chemical Manufacturing (3251, 3252, 3253, and 3259 only) from U.S. Dept. of Labor, Bureau of Labor Statistics, May 2017. See Attachment D for wage calculations.
[2] Totals may not sum due to rounding.

      (ii)	Estimating the Respondent Burden of the Third-Party Notification Export Labeling Requirement

      As discussed above, certain information must be included on the labels or labeling of exported pesticides. The labeling requirements may be met by supplemental labeling attached to either the product container or the shipping container.

      Tables 2 and 3 present the estimated respondent burden for product labeling of unregistered and registered exported pesticide products. The Agency has estimated that on average over 2015-2017, 560 unregistered pesticide products and 1,680 registered pesticide products are exported annually. The number of unregistered pesticides exported is based on counting the number of unique products per year identified in the foreign purchaser acknowledgement statements. This figure is a decrease from 611 in the estimated number of unregistered pesticide products exported annually in the previous renewal.

	Product labeling for unregistered exported products accounts for a total of eight burden hours, at a cost of $551.17, for each unregistered product. This equates to a total annual burden of 4,480 hours and a total annual cost of $308,653 across all unregistered products.

Table 2.	Respondent Burden/Cost: Unregistered Exported Pesticide Product Labeling
                              Collection Activity
                            Burden Hours (per year)
                                     Total

                                     Mgmt
                                  $127.82/hr
                                   Technical
                                   $66.48/hr
                                   Clerical
                                   $43.76/hr
                                     Hours
                                   Cost ($)
Read Regulations
                                     0.50
                                     0.00
                                     0.00
                                     0.50
                                                                          63.91
Design Labels
                                     0.00
                                     2.00
                                     0.00
                                     2.00
                                                                         132.96
Translate Labels
                                     0.00
                                     5.00
                                     0.00
                                     5.00
                                                                         332.41
Complete Paperwork and Store Information
                                     0.00
                                     0.00
                                     0.50
                                     0.50
                                                                          21.88
TOTAL
                                     0.50
                                     7.00
                                     0.50
                                     8.00
                                                                         551.17
ANNUAL BURDEN:	8 hours x 560 unregistered products = 4,480 hours
ANNUAL COSTS: 	$551.17 x 560 unregistered products = $308,653
[1] Hourly wages rates are fully loaded wage rates based on NAICS 3250A1  -  Chemical Manufacturing (3251, 3252, 3253, and 3259 only) from U.S. Dept. of Labor, Bureau of Labor Statistics, May 2017. See Attachment D for wage calculations.
[2] Totals may not sum due to rounding.

      Certain information must be provided in the languages of the country or countries of final destination. Table 3 presents the estimated respondent burden for multilingual product labeling of registered exported pesticide products. The labeling requirements may be met by supplemental labeling attached to either the product container or the shipping container. EPA estimates that it will take respondents approximately 5.5 hours at a cost of $354.29 to meet the multilingual labeling requirement for each product.  This estimation is based on the estimate that to prepare one label in one language would take approximately one hour, and that, on average, exporters prepare a label for each of the major destinations of export shipments.  In reviewing the major destinations of export shipments, EPA estimates that most labels would be in one or more of the following languages: French, Spanish, German, Taiwanese, and Portuguese.

      Historically, in order to estimate the number of registered exported pesticide products, the Agency has assumed that one-quarter of the pesticides exported from the U.S. are not registered for use in the U.S., while the remaining three-quarters are registered pesticide products. Therefore, EPA has assumed that there are three times as many registered products exported than unregistered. Using this assumption and the estimated number of exported unregistered products (560), EPA estimates the total number of registered products exported to be 1,680 per year. This equates to a total annual burden of 9,240 hours and a total annual burden of $595,209 across all respondents.

Table 3.  Respondent Burden/Cost: Multilingual Product Labeling, Registered Pesticide Product Exports
                              Collection Activity
                            Burden Hours (per year)
                                     Total

                                     Mgmt
                                  $127.82/hr
                                   Technical
                                   $66.48/hr
                                   Clerical
                                   $43.76/hr
                                     Hours
                                   Cost ($)
Translate Labels
                                     0.00
                                     5.00
                                     0.00
                                     5.00
                                                                         332.41
Complete Paperwork and Store Information
                                     0.00
                                     0.00
                                     0.50
                                     0.50
                                                                          21.88
TOTAL
                                     0.00
                                     5.00
                                     0.50
                                     5.50
                                                                         354.29
ANNUAL BURDEN:	5.5 hours x 1,680 exported registered products = 9,240 hours
ANNUAL COSTS:  	$354.29 x 1,680 exported registered products = $595,209
[1] Hourly wages rates are fully loaded wage rates based on NAICS 3250A1  -  Chemical Manufacturing (3251, 3252, 3253, and 3259 only) from U.S. Dept. of Labor, Bureau of Labor Statistics, May 2017. See Attachment D for wage calculations.
[2] Totals may not sum due to rounding.

      6(c)	Estimating Agency Burden and Cost

      Agency costs for this information collection consist mainly of FTE time spent, the majority of which is due to record keeping associated with the receipt of the acknowledgment statements, review of transmissions to be sent to foreign governments, and costs associated with the transmittal of acknowledgment statements to the appropriate government official in the importing country. EPA estimated hourly burden at 0.33 hours (around 20 minutes) per statement. Based on this estimate, annual costs are determined by multiplying hourly burden by the wage rate for technical labor. This estimate represents an increase of 431 burden hours since the previous renewal. This decrease is due to the automation of the filing and transmission process described in section 5(a).

Table 4.	Agency Processing Burden for FPAS Requirement
	Collection Activity
                                     Hours
                                Annual Cost ($)

                                   Technical
                                   $82.67/hr

Receive, review acknowledgment statements for completeness, and scan to make digital copies
                                     0.12
                                     9.65
Data entry of information in acknowledgment statements
                                     0.07
                                     5.51
Make necessary copies and transmit submission to appropriate government officials of importing countries
                                     0.05
                                     4.13
Review of prepared submission by OPP international team staff or GISB management, and transmission of the documentation to the appropriate government authority
                                     0.05
                                     4.13
Maintain a file of all submissions
                                     0.05
                                     4.13
Respond to inquiries: EPA receives 30 inquiries per year, spends 1 hour to respond to each inquiry.
                                      30

TOTAL
                                     0.33
                                     27.56
ANNUAL BURDEN:	2,774 statements x 0.33 hours = 945 hours[1]
ANNUAL COSTS: 	2,774 statements x $27.56 = $78,932
[1]Includes 30 hours of EPA burden in responding to 30 inquiries per year.
Hourly wages rates are fully loaded wage rates based on NAICS code 999100 - Federal Executive Branch from U.S. Dept. of Labor, Bureau of Labor Statistics, May 2017. See Attachment E for wage calculations.
Totals may not sum due to rounding.

      6(d) 	Bottom Line Burden Hours and Cost

 Respondent Burden by Information Collection (IC)

      The total annual respondent burden hours for this ICR are estimated at 16,660 hours.  This accounts for 2,940 hours for the FPAS requirement, 4,480 hours for the labeling of unregistered pesticides, and 9,240 hours for the labeling of registered pesticides.

      The total annual respondent cost for this ICR is estimated to be $1,087,202.  This estimate is composed of the following costs:  $183,239 for the FPAS requirement, $308,653 for the labeling of unregistered pesticides, and $595,209 for the labeling of registered pesticides.

Table 5. 		Total Annual Respondent Burden Hours and Cost
                            Information Collection
                              Responses Per Year
                          Burden Per Response (hours)
                             Annual Burden (hours)
                                Annual Cost ($)

Foreign Purchaser Acknowledgment Statements
                                     2,774
                                     1.06
                                     2,940
                                   $183,239
Labeling for Unregistered Exported Pesticide Products
                                      560
                                       8
                                     4,480
                                   $308,653
Multilingual Product Labeling for Registered Exported Pesticide Products
                                     1,680
                                      5.5
                                     9,240
                                   $595,209
                        Total Annual Respondent Burden
                                    16,660
                                  $1,087,102
[1] Totals may not sum due to rounding.

      	(ii)	Agency Burden

      The total annual agency burden for this ICR is estimated to be 943 hours. This would result in a total annual agency cost of $78,932.

Table 6.	Bottom Line Burden Hours and Cost

                                     TOTAL

                                     Hours
                                     Costs
Respondent Burden Estimate
                                    16,660
                                  $1,087,102
Agency Burden Estimate
                                      945
                                      $78,932

      6(e)	Reason for Changes in Burden

      There was no change in the estimated average response time for respondents. There is a decrease of 1,333 hours in the total estimated respondent burden compared with the ICR currently approved by OMB. This decrease reflects a reduction in the annual number of foreign purchaser acknowledgment statements received by EPA (from 3,024 to 2,774), which resulted in a corresponding decrease in the estimated annual burden hours for respondents (from 3,205 to 2,940 hours); and a reduction in the estimated annual burden associated with labeling requirements. The respondent burden associated with labeling requirements for unregistered exported pesticides decreased from 4,888 to 4,480 hours; and from 9,900 to 9,240 hours associated with labeling requirements for registered exported pesticides. The decrease in burden associated with labeling requirements is due to a reduction in the number of respondents per calendar years 2015-2017. Total labor costs for respondents decreased due to a decrease in the estimated number of respondents per calendar year from 2015-2017 and an update to the wage rate estimates, which incorporated higher estimates for benefits than was used in the previous renewal. These changes qualify as adjustments.

      There were program changes affecting the Agency burden estimate. There is an increase of 421 hours in the total estimated Agency burden compared with that identified in the ICR currently approved by OMB. The total Agency burden increased due to an increase in the EPA estimated hourly burden from 0.17 hours (around 10 minutes) per statement to 0.33 hours (around 20 minutes) per statement. This increase is due to processes added to ensure proper review of FPAS statements before being sent to the importing country. There has also been a change in the system used and steps for storing digital copies of the FPAS. Total labor costs for the Agency also increased due to changes in the wage rates made to reflect current wage rates. The new wage estimates incorporated higher estimates for benefits than was used in the previous renewal. These changes are an adjustment.

      6(f)	Burden Statement

      Annual respondent burden for this collection of FPAS information requirements is estimated to average 1.06 hours (around 65 minutes) per response and has not changed since the last renewal.  The annual respondent burden for meeting labeling requirements for unregistered and registered exported pesticide products is estimated to average 8.0 hours and 5.5 hours, respectively. Burden is defined at 5 CFR 1320.3(b). This estimate includes the time for reviewing instructions, gathering and maintaining the data needed, and completing and reviewing the collection of information.

      Under PRA, 44 U.S.C. 3501 et seq., an agency may not conduct or sponsor, and a person is not required to respond to, a collection of information, unless it displays a currently valid OMB control number. The OMB control numbers are displayed either by publication in the Federal Register or by other appropriate means, such as on the related collection instrument or form, if applicable. The display of OMB control numbers for certain EPA regulations is consolidated in 40 CFR part 9.

      EPA has established a public docket for this ICR under Docket ID No. EPA-HQ-OPP-2018-0266, which is available for online viewing at http://www.regulations.gov , or in person viewing at the EPA Docket Center-Public Reading Room, William Jefferson Clinton (WJC) West Building, in Rm. 3334, 1301 Constitution Avenue, NW, Washington, DC. This docket facility is open from 8:30 a.m. to 4:30 p.m., Monday through Friday, excluding federal holidays. The docket telephone number is<PHONE_NUMBER>.  You may submit comments regarding the Agency's need for this information, the accuracy of the provided burden estimates and any suggested methods for minimizing respondent burden, including the use of automated collection techniques.

      Comments may be submitted to EPA electronically through http://www.regulations.gov or by mail addressed to Director, Regulatory Support Division, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (2822T), 1200 Pennsylvania Ave., NW, Washington, D.C. 20460. Include Docket ID No. EPA-HQ-OPP-2018-0266 and OMB control number 2070-0027 in any correspondence.

                    ATTACHMENTS TO THE SUPPORTING STATEMENT

Attachments to the supporting statement are available in the public docket established for this ICR under docket identification number EPA-HQ-OPP-2018-0266. These attachments are available for online viewing at http://www.regulations.gov or otherwise accessed as described in section 6(f) of the supporting statement.

Attachment A:
7 U.S.C. 136o - Section 17 of the Federal Insecticide, Fungicide, and Rodenticide Act Also available online at the United States GPO website.

Attachment B:
40 CFR 168.75 - Procedures for exporting unregistered pesticides  -  purchaser acknowledgement statements. Also available online at the Electronic Code of Federal Regulations website.

Attachment C:
Consultation Summary
Attachment D:
Work Sheets used to Calculate Industry Labor Costs

Attachment E:
Work Sheets used to Calculate EPA and Federal Government Labor Costs
Attachment F:
Display Related to OMB Control #2070-0027


[Federal Register Volume 77, Number 110 (Thursday, June 7, 2012)]
[Proposed Rules]
[Pages 33685-33687]
[FR Doc No: 2012-13838]

=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION

Federal Aviation Administration

14 CFR Part 71

[Docket No. FAA-2012-0365; Airspace Docket No. 12-ASO-22]

Proposed Establishment of Class E Airspace; Arcadia, FL

AGENCY: Federal Aviation Administration (FAA), DOT.

ACTION: Notice of proposed rulemaking (NPRM).

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: This action proposes to establish Class E Airspace at Arcadia,
FL, to accommodate the Area Navigation (RNAV) Global Positioning System
(GPS) Standard Instrument Approach Procedures at Arcadia Municipal
Airport. This action would enhance the safety and airspace management
of Instrument Flight Rules (IFR) operations at the airport.

DATES: Comments must be received on or before July 23, 2012. The
Director of

the Federal Register approves this incorporation by reference action
under title 1, Code of Federal Regulations, part 51, subject to the
annual revision of FAA, Order 7400.9 and publication of conforming
amendments.

ADDRESSES: Send comments on this rule to: U. S. Department of
Transportation, Docket Operations, West Building Ground Floor, Room
W12-140, 1200 New Jersey Avenue SE., Washington, DC 20590-0001;
Telephone: 1-800-647-5527; Fax:<PHONE_NUMBER>. You must identify the
Docket Number FAA-2012-0365; Airspace Docket No. 12-ASO-22, at the
beginning of your comments. You may also submit and review received
comments through the Internet at http://www.regulations.gov.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: John Fornito, Operations Support
Group, Eastern Service Center, Federal Aviation Administration, P.O.
Box 20636, Atlanta, Georgia 30320; telephone<PHONE_NUMBER>.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

Comments Invited

    Interested persons are invited to comment on this rule by
submitting such written data, views, or arguments, as they may desire.
Comments that provide the factual basis supporting the views and
suggestions presented are particularly helpful in developing reasoned
regulatory decisions on the proposal. Comments are specifically invited
on the overall regulatory, aeronautical, economic, environmental, and
energy-related aspects of the proposal.
    Communications should identify both docket numbers (FAA Docket No.
FAA-2012-0365; Airspace Docket No. 12-ASO-22) and be submitted in
triplicate to the Docket Management System (see ADDRESSES section for
address and phone number). You may also submit comments through the
Internet at http://www.regulations.gov.
    Persons wishing the FAA to acknowledge receipt of their comments on
this action must submit with those comments a self-addressed stamped
postcard on which the following statement is made: ``Comments to Docket
No. FAA-2012-0365; Airspace Docket No. 12-ASO-22.'' The postcard will
be date/time stamped and returned to the commenter.
    All communications received before the specified closing date for
comments will be considered before taking action on the proposed rule.
The proposal contained in this notice may be changed in light of the
comments received. A report summarizing each substantive public contact
with FAA personnel concerned with this rulemaking will be filed in the
docket.

Availability of NPRMs

    An electronic copy of this document may be downloaded from and
comments submitted through http://www.regulations.gov. Recently
published rulemaking documents can also be accessed through the FAA's
Web page at http://www.faa.gov/airports_airtraffic/air_traffic/publications/airspace_amendments/.
    You may review the public docket containing the proposal, any
comments received and any final disposition in person in the Dockets
Office (see the ADDRESSES section for address and phone number) between
9:00 a.m. and 5:00 p.m., Monday through Friday, except Federal
holidays. An informal docket may also be examined during normal
business hours at the office of the Eastern Service Center, Federal
Aviation Administration, room 350, 1701 Columbia Avenue, College Park,
Georgia 30337.
    Persons interested in being placed on a mailing list for future
NPRMs should contact the FAA's Office of Rulemaking,<PHONE_NUMBER>, to
request a copy of Advisory Circular No. 11-2A, Notice of Proposed
Rulemaking distribution System, which describes the application
procedure.

The Proposal

    The FAA is considering an amendment to Title 14, Code of Federal
Regulations (14 CFR) part 71 to establish Class E airspace at Arcadia,
FL, providing the controlled airspace required to support the RNAV GPS
standard instrument approach procedures for Arcadia Municipal Airport.
Controlled airspace extending upward from 700 feet above the surface
would be established for the safety and management of IFR operations at
the airport.
    Class E airspace designations are published in Paragraph 6005 of
FAA Order 7400.9V, dated August 9, 2011, and effective September 15,
2011, which is incorporated by reference in 14 CFR 71.1. The Class E
airspace designation listed in this document will be published
subsequently in the Order.
    The FAA has determined that this proposed regulation only involves
an established body of technical regulations for which frequent and
routine amendments are necessary to keep them operationally current.
It, therefore, (1) Is not a ``significant regulatory action'' under
Executive Order 12866; (2) is not a ``significant rule'' under DOT
Regulatory Policies and Procedures (44 FR 11034; February 26, 1979);
and (3) does not warrant preparation of a Regulatory Evaluation as the
anticipated impact is so minimal. Since this is a routine matter that
will only affect air traffic procedures and air navigation, it is
certified that this proposed rule, when promulgated, would not have a
significant economic impact on a substantial number of small entities
under the criteria of the Regulatory Flexibility Act.
    The FAA's authority to issue rules regarding aviation safety is
found in Title 49 of the United States Code. Subtitle I, Section 106
describes the authority of the FAA Administrator. Subtitle VII,
Aviation Programs, describes in more detail the scope of the agency's
authority. This proposed rulemaking is promulgated under the authority
described in Subtitle VII, Part, A, Subpart I, Section 40103. Under
that section, the FAA is charged with prescribing regulations to assign
the use of airspace necessary to ensure the safety of aircraft and the
efficient use of airspace. This proposed regulation is within the scope
of that authority as it would establish Class E airspace at Arcadia
Municipal Airport, Arcadia, FL.
    This proposal will be subject to an environmental analysis in
accordance with FAA Order 1050.1E, ``Environmental Impacts: Policies
and Procedures'' prior to any FAA final regulatory action.

Lists of Subjects in 14 CFR Part 71

    Airspace, Incorporation by reference, Navigation (air).

The Proposed Amendment

    In consideration of the foregoing, the Federal Aviation
Administration proposes to amend 14 CFR part 71 as follows:

PART 71--DESIGNATION OF CLASS A, B, C, D, AND E AIRSPACE AREAS; AIR
TRAFFIC SERVICE ROUTES; AND REPORTING POINTS

    1. The authority citation for part 71 continues to read as follows:

    Authority:  49 U.S.C. 106(g); 40103, 40113, 40120; E.O. 10854,
24 FR 9565, 3 CFR, 1959-1963 Comp., p. 389.

Sec.  71.1  [Amended]

    2. The incorporation by reference in 14 CFR 71.1 of Federal
Aviation Administration Order 7400.9V, Airspace Designations and
Reporting Points, dated August 9, 2011, effective September 15, 2011,
is amended as follows:

Paragraph 6005 Class E airspace areas extending upward from 700
feet or more above the surface of the earth.

* * * * *

ASO FL E5 Arcadia, FL [New]

Arcadia Municipal Airport, FL

    (Lat. 27[deg]11'31'' N., long. 81[deg]50'14'' W.)

    That airspace extending upward from 700 feet above the surface
within a 6.5-mile radius of Arcadia Municipal Airport.

    Issued in College Park, Georgia, on May 30, 2012.
Michael D. Wagner,
Acting Manager, Operations Support Group, Eastern Service Center, Air
Traffic Organization.
[FR Doc. 2012-13838 Filed 6-6-12; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910-13-P


[Federal Register Volume 83, Number 140 (Friday, July 20, 2018)]
[Notices]
[Pages 34630-34632]
[FR Doc No: 2018-15505]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

[Release No. 34-83643; File No. SR-CboeEDGA-2018-012]

Self-Regulatory Organizations; Cboe EDGA Exchange, Inc.; Notice
of Filing and Immediate Effectiveness of a Proposed Rule Change Related
to Fees for Use on Cboe EDGA Exchange, Inc.

July 16, 2018.
    Pursuant to Section 19(b)(1) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934
(``Act''),\1\ and Rule 19b-4 thereunder,\2\ notice is hereby given that
on July 2, 2018, Cboe EDGA Exchange, Inc. (``Exchange'' or ``EDGA'')
filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (``Commission'') the
proposed rule change as described in Items I, II and III below, which
Items have been prepared by the Exchange. The Exchange has designated
the proposed rule change as one establishing or changing a member due,
fee, or other charge imposed by the Exchange under Section
19(b)(3)(A)(ii) of the Act \3\ and Rule 19b-4(f)(2) thereunder,\4\
which renders the proposed rule change effective upon filing with the
Commission. The Commission is publishing this notice to solicit
comments on the proposed rule change from interested persons.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \1\ 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(1).
    \2\ 17 CFR 240.19b-4.
    \3\ 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(3)(A)(ii).
    \4\ 17 CFR 240.19b-4(f)(2).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

I. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement of the Terms of Substance
of the Proposed Rule Change

    The Exchange filed a proposal to amend the fee schedule applicable
to Members \5\ and non-Members of the Exchange pursuant to EDGA Rules
15.1(a) and (c).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \5\ The term ``Member'' is defined as ``any registered broker or
dealer that has been admitted to membership in the Exchange.'' See
Exchange Rule 1.5(n).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    The text of the proposed rule change is available at the Exchange's
website at www.markets.cboe.com, at the principal office of the
Exchange, and at the Commission's Public Reference Room.

II. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement of the Purpose of, and
Statutory Basis for, the Proposed Rule Change

    In its filing with the Commission, the Exchange included statements
concerning the purpose of and basis for the proposed rule change and
discussed any comments it received on the proposed rule change. The
text of these statements may be examined at the places specified in
Item IV below. The Exchange has prepared summaries, set forth in
Sections A, B, and C below, of the most significant parts of such
statements.

(A) Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement of the Purpose of, and
Statutory Basis for, the Proposed Rule Change

1. Purpose
    The Exchange proposes to amend its fee schedule to (i) amend its
pricing model, (ii) eliminate Add Volume Tier 1 and (iii) amend certain
routing fees, effective July 2, 2018.
    Currently, the Exchange utilizes a low pricing model under which it
charges a low fee or provides the execution free of charge. The
Exchange proposes to amend its fee schedule to replace its current low
pricing model to an inverted pricing model under which the Exchange
will charge a fee to add liquidity and provide a rebate to remove
liquidity.
Displayed Order Fee Change
    In securities priced at or above $1.00, the Exchange currently
charges a fee of $0.00030 per share for Displayed orders that add or
remove liquidity. The Exchange proposes to assess a standard rate of
$0.00080 per share for Displayed orders that add liquidity for
securities at or above $1.00 that are appended with fee codes B, V, Y,
3 or 4. The Exchange also proposes to provide a rebate of $0.00040 per
share for orders that remove liquidity for securities at or above $1.00
that are appended with fee codes N, W, 6, or BB. All Displayed orders
in securities priced below $1.00 would continue to be free.
Non-Displayed Order Fee Change
    In securities priced at or above $1.00, the Exchange currently
charges a fee of $0.00050 per share for Non-Displayed orders that
remove liquidity other than orders that yield fee code DT and DR (i.e.,
orders that yield fee codes HR, MT, PT). The Exchange notes that it
does not assess a fee or provide a rebate for Non-Displayed orders that
remove liquidity using Midpoint Discretionary Orders within
discretionary range and yield fee code DT. The Exchange does assess a
fee of $0.00030 for Non-Displayed orders that remove liquidity using
MidPoint Discretionary Orders that are not within discretionary range
and yield fee code DR. The Exchange does not currently assess a fee or
provide a rebate for Non-Displayed orders that add liquidity other than
orders that yield fee code DA (i.e., orders that yield fee codes DM,
HA, MM, RP, PA). The Exchange does assess a fee of $0.00030 per share
for Non-

Displayed orders that add liquidity using Midpoint Discretionary orders
not within dictionary range and yield fee code DA. In connection with
its proposal to implement an inverted pricing model, and to simplify
its fee schedule, the Exchange now proposes to provide a rebate of
$0.00040 per share to all Non-Displayed orders in securities priced
above $1.00 that remove liquidity and to charge $0.00080 per share to
all Non-Displayed orders that add liquidity. The Exchange does not
propose to amend the fees charged for Non-Displayed orders in
securities priced below $1.00.
    Additionally, in light of the change in pricing model, the Exchange
does not wish to maintain Add Volume Tier 1 and accordingly proposes to
eliminate it from the fee schedule.
    The Exchange next proposes to amend certain routing fees.
Particularly, for securities at or above $1.00, the Exchange proposes
to amend routing fees for the following orders: (i) Routed orders, pre
and post market, which yield fee code 7 and are charged $0.00270 per
share, (ii) routed orders to EDGX, which yield fee code I and are
charged $0.00290 per share; (iii) routed orders, which yield fee code X
and are charged $0.00290 per share; (iv) routed orders using ROUX
routing strategy, which yield fee code RX and are charged $0.00280 per
share and (v) routed orders using ROUT routing strategy, which yield
fee code RT and are charged $0.00260 per share. The Exchange is
proposing to amend those rates as follows: (i) the fee for routed
orders, pre and post market, which yield fee code 7, would be increased
to $0.00300 per share; (ii) the fee for routed orders to EDGX, which
yield fee code I, would be increased to $0.00300 per share; (iii) the
fee for routed orders, which yield fee code X, would be increased to
$0.00300 per share; (iv) the fee for routed orders using ROUX routing
strategy, which yield fee code RX, would be increased to $0.00290 per
share and (v) the fee for routed orders using ROUT routing strategy,
which yield fee code RT, would be increased to $0.00280 per share. The
Exchange notes that the proposed amounts are in line with amounts
assessed for similar transaction on other exchanges.\6\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \6\ See e.g., Cboe EDGX U.S. Securities Fee Schedule, Fee Codes
and Associated Fees. See also NYSE National, Inc. Schedule of Fees
and Rebates, Section II, Routing Fees.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

2. Statutory Basis
    The Exchange believes that the proposed rule change is consistent
with the objectives of Section 6 of the Act,\7\ in general, and
furthers the objectives of Section 6(b)(4),\8\ in particular, as it is
designed to provide for the equitable allocation of reasonable dues,
fees and other charges among its Members and other persons using its
facilities.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \7\ 15 U.S.C. 78f.
    \8\ 15 U.S.C. 78f(b)(4).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    The Exchange believes its proposal to replace its current low fee
model with a taker-maker pricing model where it would charge a fee for
adding liquidity and provide a rebate for removing liquidity is
equitable and reasonable as it would serve to simplify its fee schedule
to provide a standard rate for orders that add liquidity and a standard
rebate for orders that remove liquidity, while also eliminating its
pricing incentive under Add Volume Tier 1. The proposed fee structure
provides a simple and straightforward model that would treat Displayed
and Non-Displayed orders equally.
    The Exchange believes providing rebates for orders removing
liquidity is reasonable, equitable and not unfairly discriminatory
because it provides an incentive to bring additional liquidity to the
Exchange, thereby promoting price discovery and enhancing order
execution opportunities for Members. The Exchange believes that
assessing fees for orders that add liquidity is reasonable, equitable
and not unfairly discriminatory because the Exchange must balance the
cost of credits for orders that remove liquidity. The Exchange believes
the proposed changes are equitable and not unfairly discriminatory
because they apply equally to all members. The Exchange also notes that
other exchanges utilize taker-maker pricing models and notes that the
proposed fees and rebates are in line with the fees and rebates
assessed on other exchanges for similar transactions.\9\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \9\ See e.g., Cboe BYX U.S. Equities Fee Schedule, Standard
Rates, for transactions that add and remove liquidity. See also NYSE
National, Inc. Schedule of Fees and Rebates, Section I.A General
Rates, for transaction fees for adding liquidity.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    The elimination of Add Volume Tier 1 is also equitable and
reasonable because it would aid in simplifying the fee schedule and
result in all Members being charged the same rates for all transactions
regardless of their monthly volumes. The proposed change also applies
to all Members.
    The Exchange lastly believes its proposed changes relating to
certain routing fees are reasonable taking into account routing costs
and also notes that the proposed changes are in line with amounts
assessed by other exchanges.\10\ The Exchange believes the proposed
changes to its routing fees are equitable and not unfairly
discriminatory because the proposed changes apply equally to all
Members. The Exchange notes that routing through the Exchange is
voluntary and also notes that it operates in a highly competitive
market in which market participants can readily direct order flow to
competing venues or providers of routing services if they deem fee
levels to be excessive.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \10\ See e.g., Cboe EDGX U.S. Securities Fee Schedule, Fee Codes
and Associated Fees. See also NYSE National, Inc. Schedule of Fees
and Rebates, Section II, Routing Fees.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

(B) Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement on Burden on Competition

    This proposed rule change does not impose any burden on competition
that is not necessary or appropriate in furtherance of the purposes of
the Act. The Exchange does not believe that this change represents a
significant departure from previous pricing offered by the Exchange's
competitors. The proposed rates and rebates would apply uniformly to
all Members, and Members may opt to disfavor the Exchange's pricing if
they believe that alternatives offer them better value. Accordingly,
the Exchange does not believe that the proposed changes will impair the
ability of Members or competing venues to maintain their competitive
standing in the financial markets. Further, excessive fees would serve
to impair an exchange's ability to compete for order flow and members
rather than burdening competition. The Exchange believes that its
proposal would not burden intramarket competition because the proposed
rate would apply uniformly to all Members.

(C) Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement on Comments on the
Proposed Rule Change Received From Members, Participants or Others

    The Exchange has not solicited, and does not intend to solicit,
comments on this proposed rule change. The Exchange has not received
any written comments from members or other interested parties.

III. Date of Effectiveness of the Proposed Rule Change and Timing for
Commission Action

    The foregoing rule change has become effective pursuant to Section
19(b)(3)(A) of the Act \11\ and paragraph (f) of Rule 19b-4
thereunder.\12\ At any time within 60 days of the filing of the
proposed rule change, the Commission summarily may temporarily suspend
such rule change if it appears to the Commission that such action is
necessary or appropriate in the public interest, for the protection of

investors, or otherwise in furtherance of the purposes of the Act.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \11\ 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(3)(A).
    \12\ 17 CFR 240.19b-4(f).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

IV. Solicitation of Comments

    Interested persons are invited to submit written data, views, and
arguments concerning the foregoing, including whether the proposed rule
change is consistent with the Act. Comments may be submitted by any of
the following methods:

Electronic Comments

     Use the Commission's internet comment form (http://www.sec.gov/rules/sro.shtml); or
     Send an email to [email protected]. Please include
File Number SR-CboeEDGA-2018-012 on the subject line.

Paper Comments

     Send paper comments in triplicate to Secretary, Securities
and Exchange Commission, 100 F Street NE, Washington, DC 20549-1090.

All submissions should refer to File Number SR-CboeEDGA-2018-012. This
file number should be included on the subject line if email is used. To
help the Commission process and review your comments more efficiently,
please use only one method. The Commission will post all comments on
the Commission's internet website (http://www.sec.gov/rules/sro.shtml).
Copies of the submission, all subsequent amendments, all written
statements with respect to the proposed rule change that are filed with
the Commission, and all written communications relating to the proposed
rule change between the Commission and any person, other than those
that may be withheld from the public in accordance with the provisions
of 5 U.S.C. 552, will be available for website viewing and printing in
the Commission's Public Reference Room, 100 F Street NE, Washington, DC
20549, on official business days between the hours of 10:00 a.m. and
3:00 p.m. Copies of the filing also will be available for inspection
and copying at the principal office of the Exchange. All comments
received will be posted without change. Persons submitting comments are
cautioned that we do not redact or edit personal identifying
information from comment submissions. You should submit only
information that you wish to make available publicly. All submissions
should refer to File Number SR-CboeEDGA-2018-012 and should be
submitted on or before August 10, 2018.

    For the Commission, by the Division of Trading and Markets,
pursuant to delegated authority.\13\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \13\ 17 CFR 200.30-3(a)(12).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

Eduardo A. Aleman,
Assistant Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2018-15505 Filed 7-19-18; 8:45 am]
 BILLING CODE 8011-01-P