VI. Conclusion

    It is therefore ordered, pursuant to Section 19(b)(2) of the Act,
that the proposed rule change (SR-FINRA-2017-003) is approved.

    For the Commission, by the Division of Trading and Markets,
pursuant to delegated authority.\109\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \109\ 17 CFR 200.30-3(a)(12).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

Eduardo A. Aleman,
Assistant Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2017-05504 Filed 3-20-17; 8:45 am]
 BILLING CODE 8011-01-P


[Federal Register Volume 80, Number 182 (Monday, September 21, 2015)]
[Notices]
[Page 56982]
[FR Doc No: 2015-23555]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY

[EPA-HQ-OECA-2014-0075; FRL-9934-31-OEI]

Information Collection Request Submitted to OMB for Review and
Approval; Comment Request; NESHAP for Municipal Solid Waste Landfills
(Renewal)

AGENCY: Environmental Protection Agency (EPA).

ACTION: Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Environmental Protection Agency has submitted an
information collection request (ICR), ``NESHAP for Municipal Solid
Waste Landfills (40 CFR part 63, subpart AAAA) (Renewal)'' (EPA ICR No.
1938.06, OMB Control No. 2060-0505) to the Office of Management and
Budget (OMB) for review and approval in accordance with the Paperwork
Reduction Act (44 U.S.C. 3501 et seq.). This is a proposed extension of
the ICR, which is currently approved through September 30, 2015. Public
comments were previously requested via the Federal Register (79 FR
30117) on May 27, 2014 during a 60-day comment period. This notice
allows for an additional 30 days for public comments. A fuller
description of the ICR is given below, including its estimated burden
and cost to the public. An Agency may not conduct or sponsor and a
person is not required to respond to a collection of information unless
it displays a currently valid OMB control number.

DATES: Additional comments may be submitted on or before October 21,
2015.

ADDRESSES: Submit your comments, referencing Docket ID Number EPA-HQ-
OECA-2014-0075, to (1) EPA online using www.regulations.gov (our
preferred method), by email to<EMAIL_ADDRESS>or by mail to: EPA
Docket Center, Environmental Protection Agency, Mail Code 28221T, 1200
Pennsylvania Ave. NW., Washington, DC 20460, and (2) OMB via email to
<EMAIL_ADDRESS>Address comments to OMB Desk Officer for
EPA.
    EPA's policy is that all comments received will be included in the
public docket without change including any personal information
provided, unless the comment includes profanity, threats, information
claimed to be Confidential Business Information (CBI), or other
information whose disclosure is restricted by statute.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Patrick Yellin, Monitoring,
Assistance, and Media Programs Division, Office of Compliance, Mail
Code 2227A, Environmental Protection Agency, 1200 Pennsylvania Ave.
NW., Washington, DC 20460; telephone number:<PHONE_NUMBER>; fax
number:<PHONE_NUMBER>; email address<EMAIL_ADDRESS>
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Supporting documents which explain in detail
the information that the EPA will be collecting are available in the
public docket for this ICR. The docket can be viewed online at
www.regulations.gov or in person at the EPA Docket Center, EPA West,
Room 3334, 1301 Constitution Ave. NW., Washington, DC. The telephone
number for the Docket Center is<PHONE_NUMBER>. For additional
information about EPA's public docket, visit www.epa.gov/dockets.
    Abstract: The affected entities are subject to the General
Provisions of the NESHAP at 40 CFR part 63, subpart A, and any changes,
or additions to the Provisions specified at 40 CFR part 63, subpart
AAAA. Owners or operators of affected facilities must submit initial
notification, performance tests, and periodic reports and results.
Owners or operators are also required to maintain records of the
occurrence and duration of any startup, shutdown, or malfunction in the
operation of an affected facility, or any period during which the
monitoring system is inoperative. Reports, at a minimum, are required
semiannually.
    Form Numbers: None.
    Respondents/affected entities: Owners or operators of municipal
solid waste landfills.
    Respondent's obligation to respond: Mandatory (40 CFR part 63,
subpart AAAA).
    Estimated number of respondents: 1,127 (total).
    Frequency of response: Occasionally and semiannually.
    Total estimated burden: 20,900 hours (per year). Burden is defined
at 5 CFR 1320.3(b).
    Total estimated cost: $2,120,000 (per year), includes $16,900
annualized capital or operation & maintenance costs.
    Changes in the Estimates: There is an increase in the total
estimated burden as currently identified in the OMB Inventory of
Approved Burdens. This increase is due to an increase in the number of
new sources due to industry growth; it is not due to any program
changes. In addition, we have adjusted the respondent burden
calculation to assume all respondents will re-familiarize themselves
with the regulatory requirements each year. There is also an increase
in the total O&M cost associated with this ICR. Similar to the total
estimated burden, EPA has adjusted the total O&M cost to account for
industry growth that has occurred since the previous ICR.

Courtney Kerwin,
 Acting Director, Collection Strategies Division.
[FR Doc. 2015-23555 Filed 9-18-15; 8:45 am]
 BILLING CODE 6560-50-P


[Federal Register: April 12, 2007 (Volume 72, Number 70)]
[Proposed Rules]
[Page 18427]
[DOCID:fr12ap07-30]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY

40 CFR Part 52

[EPA-R05-OAR-2006-0779; FRL-8296-4]

Approval and Promulgation of Air Quality Implementation Plans;
Wisconsin; Prevention of Significant Deterioration

AGENCY: Environmental Protection Agency (EPA).

ACTION: Proposed rule.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: EPA is proposing to revise the Code of Federal Regulations
(CFR) for the purpose of giving the Wisconsin Department of Natural
Resources (WDNR) full regulatory responsibility for EPA-issued
Prevention of Significant Deterioration (PSD) permits. WDNR has the
necessary state legislative authority to take responsibility for the
permits, and has demonstrated that it has adequate resources to
maintain oversight of these permits.

DATES: Comments must be received on or before May 14, 2007.

ADDRESSES: Submit your comments, identified by Docket ID No. EPA-R05-
OAR-2006-0779, by one of the following methods:
     http://www.regulations.gov: Follow the on-line instructions for

submitting comments.
     E-mail<EMAIL_ADDRESS>     Fax:<PHONE_NUMBER>.
     Mail: Pamela Blakley, Chief, Air Permits Section, Air
Programs Branch (AR-18J), U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, 77 West
Jackson Boulevard, Chicago, Illinois 60604.
     Hand Delivery: Pamela Blakley, Chief, Air Permits Section,
Air Programs Branch (AR-18J), U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, 77
West Jackson Boulevard, Chicago, Illinois 60604. Such deliveries are
only accepted during the Regional Office normal hours of operation, and
special arrangements should be made for deliveries of boxed
information. The Regional Office official hours of business are Monday
through Friday, 8:30 a.m. to 4:30 p.m. excluding Federal holidays.
    Please see the direct final rule which is located in the Rules
section of this Federal Register for detailed instructions on how to
submit comments.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Danny Marcus, Environmental Engineer,
Air Permits Section, Air Programs Branch (AR-18J), U.S. Environmental
Protection Agency, Region 5, 77 West Jackson Boulevard, Chicago,
Illinois 60604,<PHONE_NUMBER><EMAIL_ADDRESS>
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: In the final rules section of this Federal
Register, EPA is approving the state's submittal as a direct final rule
without prior proposal because the Agency views this as a non-
controversial submittal and anticipates no adverse comments. A detailed
rationale for the approval is set forth in the direct final rule. If no
adverse comments are received in response to this rule, no further
activity is contemplated. If EPA receives adverse comments, the direct
final rule will be withdrawn and all public comments received will be
addressed in a subsequent final rule based on this proposed rule. EPA
will not institute a second comment period. Any parties interested in
commenting on this action should do so at this time. Please note that
if EPA receives adverse comment on an amendment, paragraph, or section
of this rule and if that provision may be severed from the remainder of
the rule, EPA may adopt as final those provisions of the rule that are
not the subject of an adverse comment. For additional information, see
the direct final rule which is located in the Rules section of this
Federal Register.

    Dated: March 27, 2007.
Mary A. Gade,
Regional Administrator, Region 5.
 [FR Doc. E7-6728 Filed 4-11-07; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 6560-50-P


[Federal Register: June 10, 2008 (Volume 73, Number 112)]
[Notices]
[Page 32699]
[DOCID:fr10jn08-30]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission

[Project No. 10855-118--Michigan]

Upper Peninsula Power Company; Notice of Availability of
Environmental Assessment

June 3, 2008.
    In accordance with the National Environmental Policy Act of 1969,
as amended, and the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission's (Commission)
regulations (18 CFR Part 380), the Office of Energy Projects has
prepared an environmental assessment (EA) regarding Upper Peninsula
Power Company's request to rebuild the Silver Lake Development of the
Dead River Hydroelectric Project (FERC No. 10855) located on the Dead
River in Marquette County, Michigan. This EA concludes that the
proposed reconstruction, with staff's recommended mitigation measures,
would not constitute a major Federal action significantly affecting the
quality of the human environment.
    Copies of the EA are available for review in the Public Reference
Room of the Commission's offices at 888 First Street, NE., Washington,
DC. The EA also may be viewed on the Commission's Internet Web site
(http://www.ferc.gov) using the ``eLibrary'' link. Enter the docket
number (P-10855) in the docket number field to access the document. For
assistance with eLibrary, contact<EMAIL_ADDRESS>or call
toll-free at<PHONE_NUMBER>, or for TTY contact<PHONE_NUMBER>.
    For further information regarding this notice, please contact B.
Peter Yarrington at<PHONE_NUMBER> or by e-mail at
<EMAIL_ADDRESS>
Kimberly D. Bose,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. E8-12939 Filed 6-9-08; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 6717-01-P


[Federal Register Volume 82, Number 218 (Tuesday, November 14, 2017)]
[Notices]
[Pages 52775-52776]
[FR Doc No: 2017-24566]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION

Pipeline and Hazardous Materials Safety Administration

Hazardous Materials: Notice of Applications for Special Permits

AGENCY: Pipeline and Hazardous Materials Safety Administration (PHMSA),
DOT.

ACTION: List of applications for special permits.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: In accordance with the procedures governing the application
for, and the processing of, special permits from the Department of
Transportation's Hazardous Material Regulations, notice is hereby given
that the Office of Hazardous Materials Safety has received the
application described herein. Each mode of transportation for which a
particular special permit is requested is indicated by a number in the
``Nature of Application'' portion of the table below as follows: 1--
Motor vehicle, 2--Rail freight, 3--Cargo vessel, 4--Cargo aircraft
only, 5--Passenger-carrying aircraft.

DATES: Comments must be received on or before December 14, 2017.

ADDRESSES: Record Center, Pipeline and Hazardous Materials Safety
Administration, U.S. Department of Transportation Washington, DC 20590.
    Comments should refer to the application number and be submitted in
triplicate. If confirmation of receipt of comments is desired, include
a self-addressed stamped postcard showing the special permit number.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Ryan Paquet, Director, Office of
Hazardous Materials Approvals and Permits Division, Pipeline and
Hazardous Materials Safety Administration, U.S. Department of
Transportation, East Building, PHH-30, 1200 New Jersey Avenue SE.,
Washington, DC 20590-0001,<PHONE_NUMBER>.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Copies of the applications are available for
inspection in the Records Center, East Building, PHH-30, 1200 New
Jersey Avenue Southeast, Washington DC or at http://regulations.gov.
    This notice of receipt of applications for special permit is
published in accordance with part 107 of the Federal hazardous
materials transportation law (49 U.S.C. 5117(b); 49 CFR 1.53(b)).

    Issued in Washington, DC, on October 31, 2017.
Donald Burger,
Chief, General Approvals and Permits Branch.

----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
                                                                         Regulation(s)     Nature of the special
    Application No.             Docket No.             Applicant           affected           permits thereof
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
                                              SPECIAL PERMITS DATA
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
20556-N................  .......................  SAFT AMERICA INC..  172.101(j)........  To authorize the
                                                                                transportation in
                                                                                commerce of lithium
                                                                                ion batteries in
                                                                                excess of 35 kg by
                                                                                cargo-only aircraft.
                                                                                (Mode 4)
20557-N................  .......................  XCALIBUR            180.407(b)(5),      To authorize the
                                                   LOGISTICS, LLC.     180.407(c).         transportation in
                                                                                commerce of petroleum
                                                                                crude oil in cargo
                                                                                tanks which are
                                                                                overdue for
                                                                                inspection. (Mode 1)
20559-N................  .......................  FIREAWAY INC......  172.400, 172.500,   To authorize the
                                                                       172.200, 172.300.   transportation in
                                                                                commerce of
                                                                                explosives without
                                                                                marking, labeling or
                                                                                placarding. (Modes 1,
                                                                                2, 3, 4)
20560-N................  .......................  CYTEC INDUSTRIES    172.400, 172.200,   To authorize the
                                                   INC.                172.301, 173.213.   transportation in
                                                                                commerce of
                                                                                phosphorus contained
                                                                                in manufactured
                                                                                articles in non-DOT
                                                                                specification
                                                                                packaging without
                                                                                certain hazard
                                                                                communication. (Mode
                                                                                1, 4, 5)
20564-N................  .......................  ACE Pyro, LLC.....  177.848(g)(3)(vi).  To authorize the
                                                                                transportation in
                                                                                commerce of fireworks
                                                                                with explosive
                                                                                articles of
                                                                                compatibility group
                                                                                G. (Mode 1)
20566-N................  .......................  UNIVERSITY OF       173.199(a)........  To authorize the
                                                   LOUISIANA AT                            transportation in
                                                   LAFAYETTE.                              commerce of live
                                                                                animals containing
                                                                                category B infectious
                                                                                substances. (Mode 1)
20567-N................  .......................  OMNI TANKER PTY.    107.503(b),         To authorize the
                                                   LTD.                107.503(c),         manufacture, mark,
                                                                       172.102(c)(3),      sale, and use of non-
                                                                       172.203(a),         DOT specification
                                                                       173.241, 173.242,   cargo tanks and cargo
                                                                       173.243, 178.345-   tank motor vehicles.
                                                                       1, 178.347-1,       (Mode 1)
                                                                       178.348-1,
                                                                       180.405,
                                                                       180.413(d).
20571-N................  .......................  CATALINA            173.302a,           To authorize the
                                                   CYLINDERS, INC.     178.71(l)(1)(i),    manufacture, mark,
                                                                       178.71(l)(1)(ii).   sale, and use of non-
                                                                                DOT specification
                                                                                cylinders meeting the
                                                                                requirements of ISO
                                                                                11119-2, except as
                                                                                specified in the
                                                                                special permit.
                                                                                (Modes 1, 2, 3, 4)
20573-N................  .......................  SIEMENS WIND        173.222(c)........  To authorize the
                                                   POWER, INC.                             transportation in
                                                                                commerce of dangerous
                                                                                goods in machinery or
                                                                                apparatus in
                                                                                quantities greater
                                                                                than those authorized
                                                                                in 173.222. (Modes 1,
                                                                                3)
20574-N................  .......................  ROGUE VALLEY        174.14(a).........  To authorize the
                                                   TERMINAL RAILROAD                       transportation in
                                                   CORPORATION.                            commerce of railcars
                                                                                containing hazardous
                                                                                materials without
                                                                                being subject to
                                                                                expedited movement
                                                                                requirements. (Mode
                                                                                2)
20575-N................  .......................  WORTHINGTON         173.302(a)........  To authorize the
                                                   CYLINDER                                manufacture, mark,
                                                   CORPORATION.                            sale, and use of non-
                                                                                DOT specification
                                                                                cylinders. (Modes 1,
                                                                                2, 3, 4, 5)

20576-N................  .......................  CYLINDER TESTING    172.203(a),         To authorize the use
                                                   SOLUTIONS LLC.      172.301(c),         of Specification DOT
                                                                       180.205.            3AL cylinders used
                                                                                for the
                                                                                transportation in
                                                                                commerce of certain
                                                                                compressed gases,
                                                                                when retested by a
                                                                                100% ultrasonic
                                                                                examination in lieu
                                                                                of the internal
                                                                                visual and the
                                                                                hydrostatic retest
                                                                                required in 49 CFR
                                                                                180.205. (Modes 1, 2)
20577-N................  .......................  PETROLEUM           175.700(a)........  To authorize the
                                                   HELICOPTER, INC.                        transportation in
                                                                                commerce of Class 7
                                                                                materials aboard
                                                                                passenger-carrying
                                                                                aircraft. (Mode 5)
20578-N................  .......................  JAMES ALEXANDER     172.101(j),         To authorize the
                                                   CORP.               173.27(b).          transportation in
                                                                                commerce of articles
                                                                                containing 40-60%
                                                                                hydrogen peroxide by
                                                                                aircraft. (Modes 4,
                                                                                5)
20579-N................  .......................  CARLETON            173.302(a)........  To authorize the
                                                   TECHNOLOGIES, INC.                      manufacture, mark,
                                                                                sale, and use of non-
                                                                                refillable, non-DOT
                                                                                specification
                                                                                cylinders intended to
                                                                                contain oxygen,
                                                                                compressed. (Modes 1,
                                                                                2, 3, 4, 5)
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

[FR Doc. 2017-24566 Filed 11-13-17; 8:45 am]
 BILLING CODE 4910-60-P


[Federal Register: May 11, 2010 (Volume 75, Number 90)]
[Notices]
[Page 26225]
[DOCID:fr11my10-75]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission

[Docket No. AD10-11-000]

Frequency Regulation Compensation in the Organized Wholesale
Power Markets; Notice of Technical Conference

April 27, 2010.
    Take notice that Commission staff will hold a technical conference
to elicit input on issues pertaining to Frequency Regulation
Compensation in the ISO/RTO Markets. The technical conference will take
place on May 26, 2010, from 9 a.m. to 1 p.m. Eastern Time. The
conference will be held in the Commission Meeting Room at the Federal
Energy Regulatory Commission, 888 First Street, NE., Washington, DC
20426. All interested persons are invited to participate in the
conference.
    Those interested in speaking at the conferences should notify the
Commission by May 3, 2010 by completing an online form describing the
topics that they will address: https://www.ferc.gov/whats-new/
registration/markets-05-26-speaker-form.asp. Due to time constraints,
we may not be able to accommodate all those interested in speaking. A
detailed agenda, including panel speakers, will be published at a later
date.
    The technical conference will be transcribed. Transcripts of the
conferences will be immediately available for a fee from Ace-Federal
Reporters, Inc.<PHONE_NUMBER> or 1-800-336-6646). The transcripts will
be available for free on the Commission's eLibrary system and on the
Calendar of Events approximately one week after the conference.
    There is an ``eSubscription'' link on the Web site that enables
subscribers to receive e-mail notification when a document is added to
a subscribed docket(s). For assistance with any FERC Online service,
please e-mail<EMAIL_ADDRESS>or call<PHONE_NUMBER> (toll
free). For TTY, call<PHONE_NUMBER>.
    Commission conferences are accessible under section 508 of the
Rehabilitation Act of 1973. For accessibility accommodations, please
send an e-mail to<EMAIL_ADDRESS>or call toll free (866) 208-
3372 (voice) or<PHONE_NUMBER> (TTY), or send a FAX to<PHONE_NUMBER>
with the required accommodations.
    For further information about the conference, please contact:
Tatyana Kramskaya (Technical Information), Office of Energy Policy and
Innovation, Federal Energy Regulatory Commission, 888 First Street,
NE., Washington, DC 20426,<PHONE_NUMBER><EMAIL_ADDRESS>
Eric Winterbauer (Legal Information), Office of the General Counsel--
Energy Markets, Federal Energy Regulatory Commission, 888 First Street,
NE., Washington, DC 20426,<PHONE_NUMBER><EMAIL_ADDRESS>
Kimberly D. Bose,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2010-11110 Filed 5-10-10; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6717-01-P


[Federal Register Volume 82, Number 161 (Tuesday, August 22, 2017)]
[Notices]
[Pages 39893-39894]
[FR Doc No: 2017-17768]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY

Federal Emergency Management Agency

[Internal Agency Docket No. FEMA-4329-DR; Docket ID FEMA-2017-0001]

New Hampshire; Major Disaster and Related Determinations

AGENCY: Federal Emergency Management Agency, DHS.

ACTION: Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: This is a notice of the Presidential declaration of a major
disaster for the State of New Hampshire (FEMA-4329-DR), dated August 9,
2017, and related determinations.

DATES: The declaration was issued August 9, 2017.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Dean Webster, Office of Response and
Recovery, Federal Emergency Management Agency, 500 C Street SW.,
Washington, DC 20472,<PHONE_NUMBER>.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Notice is hereby given that, in a letter
dated August 9, 2017, the President issued a major disaster declaration
under the authority of the Robert T. Stafford Disaster Relief and
Emergency Assistance Act, 42 U.S.C. 5121 et seq. (the ``Stafford
Act''), as follows:

    I have determined that the damage in certain areas of the State
of New Hampshire resulting from severe storms and flooding during
the period of July 1-2, 2017, is of sufficient severity and
magnitude to warrant a major disaster declaration under the Robert
T. Stafford Disaster Relief and Emergency Assistance Act, 42 U.S.C.
5121 et seq. (the ``Stafford Act''). Therefore, I declare that such
a major disaster exists in the State of New Hampshire.
    In order to provide Federal assistance, you are hereby
authorized to allocate from funds available for these purposes such
amounts as you find necessary for Federal disaster assistance and
administrative expenses.
    You are authorized to provide Public Assistance in the
designated areas and Hazard Mitigation throughout the State.
Consistent with the requirement that Federal assistance be
supplemental, any Federal funds provided under the Stafford Act for
Hazard Mitigation will be limited to 75 percent of the total
eligible costs. Federal funds provided under the Stafford Act for
Public Assistance also will be limited to 75 percent of the total
eligible costs, with the exception of projects that meet the
eligibility criteria for a higher Federal cost-sharing percentage
under the Public Assistance Alternative Procedures Pilot Program for
Debris Removal implemented pursuant to section 428 of the Stafford
Act.
    Further, you are authorized to make changes to this declaration
for the approved assistance to the extent allowable under the
Stafford Act.

    The Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA) hereby gives notice
that pursuant to the authority vested in the Administrator, under
Executive Order 12148, as amended, Albert Lewis, of FEMA is appointed
to act as the Federal Coordinating Officer for this major disaster.
    The following areas of the State of New Hampshire have been
designated

as adversely affected by this major disaster:

    Grafton County for Public Assistance.
    All areas within the State of New Hampshire are eligible for
assistance under the Hazard Mitigation Grant Program.
    The following Catalog of Federal Domestic Assistance Numbers
(CFDA) are to be used for reporting and drawing funds: 97.030,
Community Disaster Loans; 97.031, Cora Brown Fund; 97.032, Crisis
Counseling; 97.033, Disaster Legal Services; 97.034, Disaster
Unemployment Assistance (DUA); 97.046, Fire Management Assistance
Grant; 97.048, Disaster Housing Assistance to Individuals and
Households In Presidentially Declared Disaster Areas; 97.049,
Presidentially Declared Disaster Assistance--Disaster Housing
Operations for Individuals and Households; 97.050, Presidentially
Declared Disaster Assistance to Individuals and Households--Other
Needs; 97.036, Disaster Grants--Public Assistance (Presidentially
Declared Disasters); 97.039, Hazard Mitigation Grant.

Brock Long,
Administrator, Federal Emergency Management Agency.
[FR Doc. 2017-17768 Filed 8-21-17; 8:45 am]
 BILLING CODE 9111-23-P


[Federal Register: September 12, 2007 (Volume 72, Number 176)]
[Notices]
[Page 52093]
[DOCID:fr12se07-62]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission

[Docket Nos. ER07-939-000; ER07-939-001]

Columbia Utilities Power, LLC; Notice of Issuance of Order

August 31, 2007.
    Columbia Utilities Power, LLC (Columbia Utilities) filed an
application for market-based rate authority, with an accompanying rate
schedule. The proposed market-based rate schedule provides for the sale
of energy and capacity at market-based rates. Columbia Utilities also
requested waivers of various Commission regulations. In particular,
Columbia Utilities requested that the Commission grant blanket approval
under 18 CFR part 34 of all future issuances of securities and
assumptions of liability by Columbia Utilities.
    On August 30, 2007, pursuant to delegated authority, the Director,
Division of Tariffs and Market Development-West, granted the requests
for blanket approval under part 34 (Director's Order). The Director's
Order also stated that the Commission would publish a separate notice
in the Federal Register establishing a period of time for the filing of
protests. Accordingly, any person desiring to be heard concerning the
blanket approvals of issuances of securities or assumptions of
liability by Columbia Utilities, should file a protest with the Federal
Energy Regulatory Commission, 888 First Street, NE., Washington, DC
20426, in accordance with Rules 211 and 214 of the Commission's Rules
of Practice and Procedure. 18 CFR 385.211, 385.214 (2004).
    Notice is hereby given that the deadline for filing protests is
October 1, 2007.
    Absent a request to be heard in opposition to such blanket
approvals by the deadline above, Columbia Utilities is authorized to
issue securities and assume obligations or liabilities as a guarantor,
indorser, surety, or otherwise in respect of any security of another
person; provided that such issuance or assumption is for some lawful
object within the corporate purposes of Columbia Utilities, compatible
with the public interest, and is reasonably necessary or appropriate
for such purposes.
    The Commission reserves the right to require a further showing that
neither public nor private interests will be adversely affected by
continued approvals of Columbia Utilities' issuance of securities or
assumptions of liability.
    Copies of the full text of the Director's Order are available from
the Commission's Public Reference Room, 888 First Street, NE.,
Washington, DC 20426. The Order may also be viewed on the Commission's
Web site at http://www.ferc.gov, using the eLibrary link. Enter the

docket number excluding the last three digits in the docket number
filed to access the document. Comments, protests, and interventions may
be filed electronically via the internet in lieu of paper. See, 18 CFR
385.2001(a)(1)(iii) and the instructions on the Commission's Web site
under the ``e-Filing'' link. The Commission strongly encourages
electronic filings.

Kimberly D. Bose,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. E7-17927 Filed 9-11-07; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 6717-01-P


[Federal Register Volume 86, Number 84 (Tuesday, May 4, 2021)]
[Notices]
[Page 23770]
[FR Doc No: 2021-09354]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

[SEC File No. 270-638, OMB Control No. 3235-0690]

Proposed Collection; Comment Request

Upon Written Request Copies Available From: Securities and Exchange
Commission, Office of FOIA Services, 100 F Street NE, Washington, DC
20549-2736.

Extension:
    Form SF-3.

    Notice is hereby given that, pursuant to the Paperwork Reduction
Act of 1995 (44 U.S.C. 3501 et seq.), the Securities and Exchange
Commission (``Commission'') is soliciting comments on the collection of
information summarized below. The Commission plans to submit this
existing collection of information to the Office of Management and
Budget for extension and approval.
    Form SF-3 (17 CFR 239.45) is a short form registration statement
used for non-shelf issuers of asset-backed securities to register a
public offering of their securities under the Securities Act of 1933
(15 U.S.C. 77a et seq.). Form SF-3 takes approximately 1,380 hours per
response and is filed by approximately 71 issuers annually. The
information collected is intended to ensure that the information
required to be filed by the Commission permits verification of
compliance with securities law requirements and assures the public
availability of such information in the asset-backed securities market.
We estimate that 25% of the 1,383.21 hours per response (345.80 hours)
is prepared by the issuer for a total annual reporting burden of 24,552
hours (345.80 hours per response x 71 responses).
    Written comments are invited on: (a) Whether this proposed
collection of information is necessary for the proper performance of
the functions of the agency, including whether the information will
have practical utility; (b) the accuracy of the agency's estimate of
the burden imposed by the collection of information; (c) ways to
enhance the quality, utility, and clarity of the information collected;
and (d) ways to minimize the burden of the collection of information on
respondents, including through the use of automated collection
techniques or other forms of information technology. Consideration will
be given to comments and suggestions submitted in writing within 60
days of this publication.
    An agency may not conduct or sponsor, and a person is not required
to respond to, a collection of information unless it displays a
currently valid control number.
    Please direct your written comment to David Bottom, Director/Chief
Information Officer, Securities and Exchange Commission, c/o Cynthia
Roscoe, 100 F Street NE, Washington, DC 20549 or send an email to:
<EMAIL_ADDRESS>
    Dated: April 29, 2021.
J. Matthew DeLesDernier,
Assistant Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2021-09354 Filed 5-3-21; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 8011-01-P


UNITED STATES ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY

WASHINGTON D.C., 20460

OFFICE  OF

PREVENTION, PESTICIDES AND

TOXIC SUBSTANCES

DP Barcode:	319075

PC Code:	128940

December 29, 2005

MEMORANDUM

SUBJECT: 	Section 18 Ecological Risk and Drinking Water Exposure Assessment for the Control of Soybean Rust Using Flutriafol (Impact ( , 125SC)

FROM:	Thuy Nguyen, Senior Scientist, ERB III

Environmental Fate and Effects Division (7507C)

THROUGH:    	Daniel Rieder, Branch Chief, ERB III

Environmental Fate and Effects Division (7507C)

TO:	Daniel Rosenblatt, Risk Manager

Carmen Rodia, Risk Manager Reviewer

MUIERB

Registration Division (7505C)

The EFED has reviewed the emergency exemption request from the Minnesota and South Dakota Departments of Agriculture to use Flutriafol for the control of Australasian soybean rust.  This is the first section 18 request for this use.  Flutriafol (Impact (, 125SC), a product of Cheminova Inc, could be applied via ground or aerial spray at a rate of 0.91 oz a.i./A (0.0569 lb a.i./A) per application.  A maximum of 2 applications is allowed per year with an assumed 7-day interval between application.

Please note that no Subdivision E, J and/or N Guideline studies were submitted with this request.  Risk assessed and presented in this document was solely based on the non guideline studies submitted by the Registrant, Cheminova Inc.  According to the fate and ecological effects data extracted from these non guidelines studies, EFED concludes that the proposed use of this fungicide to control soybean rust  presents potential risks to non target birds and mammals, specifically Federally-listed endangered and threatened species.  This assessment includes the following:

-  summary of potential risks associated with the use of flutriafol (Section I); and

-  water assessment for the use of flutriafol on soybean (Section II).

Although this risk assessment addresses the specific requests from Minnesota and South Dakota, the analysis of exposure and potential risks in this report was approached from the perspective of a “national” new use assessment, except for estuarine/marine invertebrates.  The assessment of potential ecological risks for flutriafol is based on the use rate, the numbers of application, and the interval between applications outlined in the Minnesota and South Dakota Section 18 request.  Higher rates, more frequent applications, or different intervals for Section 18 requests to control soybean rust from other states, especially those associated with estuarine or marine habitant, are likely to change the conclusions concerning potential risks to terrestrial and aquatic non-target organisms that are outlined below.

I.   SUMMARY OF RISKS

A summary of potential risks associated with flutriafol use to control soybean rust is provided below and in Table I-1.  Note that no Subdivision E, J, and/or N Guideline studies were submitted for review in conjunction with this section 18 request, and risk presumed in this assessment was solely based on the non guideline studies submitted by the Registrant, Cheminova Inc.

The estimation of the Estimated Environmental Concentration (EEC) values for aquatic exposure are described in section II.  Note that although this is a request for a Section 18 in Minnesota and South Dakota, the analysis of exposure was approached from the perspective of a “national” new use assessment, and the aquatic EECs were calculated using modeling scenarios simulated in areas with the highest soybean acreage and the highest level of runoff vulnerability: Georgia, Michigan, and Mississippi.  The EEC values for terrestrial exposure were derived from the upper bound Kenaga exposure values of the Kenaga nomograph, which is based on a large set of actual field residue data and modified by Fletcher et al. (1994).  These values represent how much pesticide residue might be expected on various types of plants and insects that may serve as food items for birds and mammals foraging in and about the vicinity of the treated areas . All EECs were calculated at the highest application rate of 0.0569 lbs ai/A, 2 applications, and a 7-day reapplication interval.

Table I-1 -  Summary of risks for the use of Flutriafol to control rust on soybeans

Acute Risk

Chronic Risk

Birds

RQ = 0.07 (1000g, short grass)*

No data.  Cannot be assessed

Terrestrial Mammals

RQ = 0.06 (15g, short grass)*

RQ = 0.05 (35g, short grass)*

No data.  Cannot be assessed

Terrestrial Plants

No data.  Cannot be assessed

No data.  Cannot be assessed

Freshwater Organisms

No LOC exceedance

No LOC exceedance

Freshwater Plants - Vascular

No data.  Cannot be assessed

No data.  Cannot be assessed

Aquatic Plants - Vascular

No LOC exceedance

No data.  Cannot be assessed

* Exceed Acute Endangered Species LOC of 0.05.

Note that no toxicity data were available from the Registrant’s submission to assess risks to estuarine/marine invertebrates.  Since this request is for Minnesota and South Dakota, the use of flutriafol on soybean may not enter the estuarine/marine environment and cause potential risk to the associated aquatic organism, and therefore the estuarine/marine tests could be waived for this request.  However, these tests may be required if future Section 18s for flutriafol use on soybean are requested for states/use sites associated with estuarine or marine habitant.

Potential Risks from Flutriafol Exposure

Birds, Acute Exposure - Based on the upper bound exposure at an application rate of 0.0569 lbs a.i./Acre (2 applications, 7-day reapplication interval), the RQ was 0.07 (large birds, short grass food item), which exceeds the acute endangered species LOC of 0.05.  EECs based on other food items or bird size classes did not result in LOC exceedances.  A reduction in the maximum application rate from 0.0569 lbs a.i./Acre to 0.0375 lbs a.i./Acre would result in no acute avian LOC exceedance.  Application rates of 0.04 lbs a.i./Acre and 0.0425 lbs a.i./Acre would not result in LOC exceedance if the re-application interval was 14 or 21 days, respectively.  A single application at the maximum application rate of 0.0569 lb ai/A does not result in acute avian LOC exceedance.

EFED used the default foliar dissipation half-life of 35 days to estimate residue levels remaining from the first application at the time of the second application because no appropriate foliar dissipation half-life data were available for use in deriving EECs.

Note that there is no LOC exceedance when the EECs were calculated based on the mean Kenaga values.

Birds, Chronic Exposures - No chronic avian data were available for use in RQ calculations.  Therefore chronic risks to bird cannot be assessed.

Terrestrial Mammals, Acute Exposures.  Based on the highest proposed application rate for soybeans of 0.0569 lbs a.i./Acre (2 applications, 7-day reapplication interval), acute RQs are 0.06 and 0.05 for 15g and 35g herbivores, respectively , feeding on short grass. These RQs exceeds the acute endangered species LOC of 0.05.  The RQs based on other food items, large herbivores, all insectivores, and all granivores were below the LOC.  A reduction in the maximum application rate from 0.0569 lbs a.i./Acre to 0.0413 lbs a.i./Acre would result in no acute mammals LOC exceedances.  Application rates of 0.0438 lbs a.i./Acre and 0.0465 lbs a.i./Acre would not result in LOC exceedances if the re-application interval was 14 or 21 days, respectively.  Also, a single application at the maximum application rate of 0.0569 lb ai/Acre will reduce all RQs below the acute LOC.

Note that there is no LOC exceedance when the EECs were calculated based on the mean Kenaga values.

Terrestrial Mammals, Chronic Exposures.  No chronic mammal data were available for use in RQ calculations.  Therefore chronic risks to terrestrial mammals cannot be assessed.

Terrestrial Plants.  No toxicity data were available for use in RQ calculations for terrestrial plants.  Therefore risks to terrestrial plants cannot be assessed.

Aquatic Organisms, Acute Exposure.  No acute LOCs were exceeded for freshwater organisms.  Using the most sensitive toxicity endpoint among all freshwater organisms (LC50 of 890 ppb from freshwater invertebrates) and the highest peak aquatic exposure (EEC of 25 ppb from the GA Soybean scenario), no RQ exceeds the LOC.  Therefore, it is expected that flutriafol at application rate proposed for this Emergency Exemption Use request does not pose acute risk to freshwater fish or invertebrates at the Agency’s concern levels.

Aquatic Organisms, Chronic Exposure.   No chronic LOCs were exceeded for freshwater organisms.  The lowest reported NOAEC in these aquatic organisms was 310 ppb (daphnia).  This value is approximately 10-fold  higher than the highest peak aquatic EEC of 25 ppb (GA scenario).  Therefore, it is expected that flutriafol at application rate proposed for this Emergency Exemption Use request does not pose chronic risk to fish or invertebrates at the Agency’s concern levels.

Aquatic Plants.  The lowest algal EC50 was 1900 ppb.  This value is substantially higher than the highest peak aquatic EEC of 25 ppb (GA scenario), which indicates no acute risks to non vascular plants.  Chronic toxicity data for non vascular plants and toxicity data for other aquatic plant species are not available in the sources used for this assessment, therefore associated risks could not be evaluated.

Co-Location of Endangered Species

A summary of the number of endangered species located (county level) where soybeans are produced is presented below.  Individual endangered or threatened bird and mammal species located in counties that produce soybeans are identified in Appendix C.  Only avian endangered species LOCs were exceeded; however, potential indirect effects on species that depend on birds for survival or reproduction cannot be ruled out at this time.

II.  WATER ASSESSMENT FOR THE USE OF FLUTRIAFOL ON SOYBEAN

Surface Water Modeling

A Tier II water assessment was conducted for the proposed use of flutriafol on soybeans using the proposed maximum application rate for soybean;  0.0569 lbs ai/acre with 2 applications at 7 days interval (assumed because not specified).

Modeling of the Estimated Drinking Water Concentrations (EDWC) and Estimated Environmental Concentrations (EEC) were generated using PRZM3 (Vers. 3.12 beta compiled(05/24/01, Carsel, 1997) and EXAMS (Vers. 2.98.04 compiled 07/18/04, Burns, 2002).  PRZM simulates pesticide fate and transport as a result of leaching, direct spray drift, runoff and erosion from an agricultural field and EXAMS estimates environmental fate and transport of pesticides in a surface water body for a 30-year period (1961 to 1990).  Standard soybean cropping scenarios for three states with the highest soybean acreage and highest runoff vulnerability were simulated to represent the national use of flutriafol on this crop: Georgia, Michigan, and Mississippi.

The EECs for surface water uses a single site or multiple sites, which typically represents a high-end exposure scenario from pesticide use on a particular crop or noncrop use site.  PRZM and EXAMS were linked by the program (PE4-PL, ver. 01).   Detailed description, documentation, and direct links for running these models can be found in: http://www.epa.gov/oppefed1/models/water/index.htm.  The standard scenario for ecological exposure simulates the fate of a pesticide transported as a result of runoff and erosion, and or spray drift from an 10-ha agricultural field directly into a surface water body (PRZM). The small field is assumed to be 100% cropped. The surface water body in which the EECs are simulated (EXAMS) is the standard pond (10,000-m2 pond, 2-m deep).

The Index Reservoir (IR) is intended as a drop-in replacement for the standard pond for use in drinking water exposure assessment.  It is used in a manner similar to the standard pond, except that flow rates have been modified to reflect local weather conditions.  Guidance for using the IR is located at: http://www.epa.gov/pesticides/trac/science/.  The index reservoir (IR)  is approximately 82 m wide and 640 m long, with an area of 5.3 ha. (USEPA, 2000).  The area of the entire watershed is 172.8 ha.  Weather and agricultural practices are simulated for 30 years so that the 10-year exceedance probability at the site can be estimated. The simulation was generated using 30 years of meteorological data, encompassing the years from 1961 to 1990.

The Percent Crop Area (PCA) is a generic watershed-based adjustment factor that will be applied to pesticide concentrations estimated for the surface water component of the drinking water exposure assessment using PRZM/EXAMS with the index reservoir (IR) only.  No adjustment was made for the standard pond runs.  The output generated by the linked PRZM/EXAMS models is multiplied by the maximum percent of crop area (PCA) in any watershed (expressed as a decimal) generated for the crop or crops of interest.  Currently, OPP will apply PCA adjustments for four major crops, one of which is soybeans. The default PCA factor for soybeans is 0.41.  Guidance for using PCAs and a thorough discussion of this method and comparisons of monitoring and modeling results for selected pesticide/crop/site combinations is located at: http://www.epa.gov/pesticides/trac/science/.

Table II-1 presents the input parameters used in the PRZM/EXAMS modeling. The estimated concentrations of flutriafol in surface drinking water (EDWCs) are presented in Table II-2 and for aquatic exposure (EECs) in Table II-3.  Print outs of the surface water modeling runs are listed in Appendix A.

Ground Water Modeling

The SCI-GROW model version 2.3 was used to estimate the concentration of flutriafol in ground water.  SCI-GROW estimated the concentration of flutriafol in shallow ground water sources to be less than 1 μg/L.  Input parameters for SCI-GROW are also presented in Table II-1. Note that no PCA adjustment is required for SCI-GROW.  Print outs of the surface water modeling runs are listed in Appendix B.

Environmental Fate

Flutriafol is a systemic fungicide with eradicating action.  Similar to all triazoles, flutriafol acts as a steroid demethylation inhibitor, causing fungal cell wall to collapse and inhibiting hyphal growth.

The vapor pressure of flutriafol indicates that volatility is not a major route of degradation for this chemical in the environment.  Hydrolysis and aqueous photolysis are also very slow.  In soil, flutriafol is quite persistent, with a half life value of more than one year. No significant degradation products were identified in either water or soil studies.  As indicated by the adsorption/desorption coefficients, flutriafol is moderately mobile in the laboratory tested soils.  Field studies show that there is minimal potential for flutriafol to significantly leach to ground water under practical use conditions.

Key chemical-physical and environmental fate properties of flutriafol used in the surface and ground water modeling are summarized in Table II-1.  The environmental fate data and physical and chemical properties (Table II-1) were selected from the available non guideline study reports in accordance with Guidance for Selecting Input Parameters in Modeling the Environmental Fate and Transport of Pesticides, Version II, February 28, 2002. Detailed description, documentation, and direct links for running these models can be found in:

http://www.epa.gov/oppefed1/models/water/index.htm

Table II-1.  PRZM/EXAMS and SCI-GROW Input Parameters for Flutriafol use on Soybean.

Parameter

Value and Unit

Source

Max. application rate

2 applications @ 0.0569 lb ai/acre

Section 18 request

Maximum # of applications

2

Section 18 request

Reapplication Interval

7 and 14 days

not provided so assumed

Application Efficiency (APPEFF)

0.95 - aerial spray

EFED Guidance

Spray Drift (DRFT)

0.05 eco-aerial spray (as)

0.16 drinking water as

EFED Guidance

Chemical Application Method (CAM)

2 (foliar application)

Proposed use

Molecular Formula

Mole Wt. g/mol

C16H13F2N3O

301.3

1

Henry’s Law Constant (20(C)

Vapor Pressure (calculated)

1.3 x 10-11 atm x m3 x mol-1

4 x 10-7 Pa at 20(C

1

Solubility in water

95 mg/L (20(C in water)

1

Partition Coefficients [sorption-desorption]  Freundlich Kf mL/g

1.3 - 9.8 ( n=5)

1

Partition Coefficients

Koc mL/g

123, 157, 295, 304, 395 (mean=255; n=5) 1/n=0.94-0.97

PRZM/EXAMS = 255 (mean)

SCI-GROW input = 295 (median)

1

Hydrolysis

stable in buffered solutions at pH 4, 7, and 9 at 25 C within 30 days incubation in dark

1

Aqueous photolysis

stable in aqueous buffer solution (pH 7) at 25 C for periods up to the equivalent of 66 days FL summer sunlight

1

Aerobic soil metabolism

[half-life] days

1747 (mean first order; 672-3492 days, n=10)

PRZM/EXAMS, SCI-GROW = 1747

 (mean, no raw data (only range) were available to calculate 90th percentile of mean)

1

Anaerobic aquatic  metabolism

[half-life] days

no data; compound stable to hydrolysis

PRZM/EXAMS =3500 ( 2 x aerobic soil metabolism)

1

Soil photolysis

stable to sunlight of soil surfaces

1

Aerobic aquatic metabolism

no data

1

1- Cheminova A/S- Document N (Tier 3), July 2004

The Tier II assessment for flutriafol concentrations in Table II-2 are the 1-in-10-year annual exceedance probability for peak (acute), annual daily average (chronic), and overall daily average (cancer) concentrations in the Index Reservoir for 2 aerial applications applied at the maximum proposed rate of 0.0569 lb a.i./Acre each, at 7-day interval between application, for 30 years.

Table II-2.  Tier II PRZM/EXAMS Flutriafol Estimated Drinking Water Concentrations  (EDWCs) in Index Reservoir corrected for percent crop area (PCA = 0.41 for soybeans), based on 2 aerial applications of 0.0569 lb a.i./Acre each, and 7-day interval between application

1-in-10 year EDWC (ug/L)

Scenario

Acute

Chronic

Cancer

MI Bean

4

2

1

GA Soybean

3

1

<1

MS Soybean

2

1

<1

Tier II assessment flutriafol concentrations in Table II-3 represent the 1-in-10-year annual exceedance probability for peak, 96-hr, 21-day, 60-day, and  90-day in the standard farm pond for ground and aerial applications applied at the maximum proposed rate for 30 years.

Table II-3. Tier II PRZM/EXAMS Flutriafol Estimated Environmental Concentrations (EECs) in Standard Farm Pond, based on 2 aerial applications of 0.0569 lb a.i./Acre each, and 7-day interval between application

1-in-10 year EEC (ug/L)

Scenario

Peak

96-hr

21-day

60-day

90-day

GA Soybean

25

25

25

24

24

MI Bean

17

17

17

17

17

MS Soybean

11

11

11

11

11

Additional Citations

EPA. 1999.  Jones, R.D., J. Breithaupt, J. Carleton, L. Libelo, J. Lin, R. Matzner, and R. Parker. Guidance for Use of the Index Reservoir in Drinking Water Exposure Assessments. Environmental Fate and Effects Division, Office of Pesticide Programs, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Washington. D.C.

USDA. 2005. A Coordinated Framework for Soybean Rust Surveillance, Reporting, Prediction, Management and Outreach. page 24,  http://www.aphis.usda.gov/ppq/ep/soybean_rust/coordfram041405.pdf

Appendix A.  PRZM/EXAMS printouts

PRZM environment: GAsoybeanC.txt	modified Friday, 14 October 2005 at 15:22:04

EXAMS environment: ir298.exv	modified Thuday, 29 August 2002 at 15:34:12

Metfile: w93805.dvf	modified Wedday, 3 July 2002 at 09:04:32

Water segment concentrations (ppb)

Year	Peak	96 hr	21 Day	60 Day	90 Day	Yearly

1961	1.539	1.487	1.304	0.8502	0.7725	0.2525

1962	3.733	3.6	3.215	2.472	2.137	0.8471

1963	5.343	5.161	4.472	3.323	2.831	0.9915

1964	6.327	6.168	5.358	4.368	3.885	1.444

1965	4.469	4.316	4.072	3.501	3.086	1.314

1966	7.962	7.676	6.975	5.37	4.444	1.465

1967	2.98	2.879	2.5	2.076	1.905	0.896

1968	5.382	5.199	4.863	4.125	3.661	1.35

1969	15.85	15.31	13.22	9.803	8.075	2.477

1970	3.073	2.988	2.666	2.109	1.802	1.078

1971	2.304	2.226	1.939	1.516	1.379	0.5352

1972	3.998	3.86	3.391	2.798	2.049	0.7695

1973	2.332	2.257	1.979	1.56	1.451	0.8974

1974	4.364	4.233	3.899	3.088	2.574	0.9386

1975	2.801	2.702	2.497	2.247	1.946	0.7621

1976	6.763	6.524	5.72	4.386	3.63	1.177

1977	1.82	1.768	1.568	1.229	1.043	0.6177

1978	1.18	1.141	0.852	0.7453	0.6717	0.3034

1979	4.071	3.926	3.431	2.63	2.285	0.8537

1980	2.015	1.945	1.737	1.582	1.423	0.644

1981	2.016	1.956	1.834	1.463	1.35	0.553

1982	2.682	2.588	2.241	1.806	1.566	0.6014

1983	2.721	2.628	2.459	1.732	1.474	0.6236

1984	1.782	1.725	1.512	1.159	0.9702	0.618

1985	4.985	4.84	4.197	3.439	2.514	0.8286

1986	2.295	2.214	2.046	1.653	1.578	0.9453

1987	2.573	2.484	2.153	1.493	1.235	0.6351

1988	2.565	2.476	2.146	1.72	1.625	0.7578

1989	4.306	4.154	3.626	2.899	2.462	0.9144

1990	1.979	1.911	1.704	1.461	1.259	0.6107

Sorted results

Prob.	Peak	96 hr	21 Day	60 Day	90 Day	Yearly

0.032258064516129	15.85	15.31	13.22	9.803	8.075	2.477

0.0645161290322581	7.962	7.676	6.975	5.37	4.444	1.465

0.0967741935483871	6.763	6.524	5.72	4.386	3.885	1.444

0.129032258064516	6.327	6.168	5.358	4.368	3.661	1.35

0.161290322580645	5.382	5.199	4.863	4.125	3.63	1.314

0.193548387096774	5.343	5.161	4.472	3.501	3.086	1.177

0.225806451612903	4.985	4.84	4.197	3.439	2.831	1.078

0.258064516129032	4.469	4.316	4.072	3.323	2.574	0.9915

0.290322580645161	4.364	4.233	3.899	3.088	2.514	0.9453

0.32258064516129	4.306	4.154	3.626	2.899	2.462	0.9386

0.354838709677419	4.071	3.926	3.431	2.798	2.285	0.9144

0.387096774193548	3.998	3.86	3.391	2.63	2.137	0.8974

0.419354838709677	3.733	3.6	3.215	2.472	2.049	0.896

0.451612903225806	3.073	2.988	2.666	2.247	1.946	0.8537

0.483870967741936	2.98	2.879	2.5	2.109	1.905	0.8471

0.516129032258065	2.801	2.702	2.497	2.076	1.802	0.8286

0.548387096774194	2.721	2.628	2.459	1.806	1.625	0.7695

0.580645161290323	2.682	2.588	2.241	1.732	1.578	0.7621

0.612903225806452	2.573	2.484	2.153	1.72	1.566	0.7578

0.645161290322581	2.565	2.476	2.146	1.653	1.474	0.644

0.67741935483871	2.332	2.257	2.046	1.582	1.451	0.6351

0.709677419354839	2.304	2.226	1.979	1.56	1.423	0.6236

0.741935483870968	2.295	2.214	1.939	1.516	1.379	0.618

0.774193548387097	2.016	1.956	1.834	1.493	1.35	0.6177

0.806451612903226	2.015	1.945	1.737	1.463	1.259	0.6107

0.838709677419355	1.979	1.911	1.704	1.461	1.235	0.6014

0.870967741935484	1.82	1.768	1.568	1.229	1.043	0.553

0.903225806451613	1.782	1.725	1.512	1.159	0.9702	0.5352

0.935483870967742	1.539	1.487	1.304	0.8502	0.7725	0.3034

0.967741935483871	1.18	1.141	0.852	0.7453	0.6717	0.2525

0.1	6.7194	6.4884	5.6838	4.3842	3.8626	1.4346

Average of yearly averages:	0.890053333333334

Inputs generated by pe4.pl - 8-August-2003

Data used for this run:

Output File: flusbi

Metfile:	w93805.dvf

PRZM scenario:	GAsoybeanC.txt

EXAMS environment file:	ir298.exv

Chemical Name:	flutriafol

Description	Variable Name	Value	Units	Comments

Molecular weight	mwt	301	g/mol

Henry's Law Const.	henry	1.3E-11	atm-m^3/mol

Vapor Pressure	vapr	3E-09	torr

Solubility	sol	95	mg/L

Kd	Kd		mg/L

Koc	Koc	255	mg/L

Photolysis half-life	kdp	0	days	Half-life

Aerobic Aquatic Metabolism	kbacw	1000	days	Halfife

Anaerobic Aquatic Metabolism	kbacs	3600	days	Halfife

Aerobic Soil Metabolism	asm	1747	days	Halfife

Hydrolysis:	pH 7	0	days	Half-life

Method:	CAM	2	integer	See PRZM manual

Incorporation Depth:	DEPI	0	cm

Application Rate:	TAPP	0.0637	kg/ha

Application Efficiency:	APPEFF	0.95	fraction

Spray Drift	DRFT	0.16	fraction of application rate applied to pond

Application Date	Date	01-09	dd/mm or dd/mmm or dd-mm or dd-mmm

Interval 1	interval	14	days	Set to 0 or delete line for single app.

Record 17:	FILTRA

IPSCND

UPTKF

Record 18:	PLVKRT

PLDKRT

FEXTRC	0.5

Flag for Index Res. Run	IR	IR

Flag for runoff calc.	RUNOFF	total	none, monthly or total(average of entire run)

----------------

PRZM environment: MIbeansC.txt	modified Monday, 10 May 2004 at 07:24:24

EXAMS environment: ir298.exv	modified Thuday, 29 August 2002 at 15:34:12

Metfile: w14826.dvf	modified Wedday, 3 July 2002 at 09:05:38

Water segment concentrations (ppb)

Year	Peak	96 hr	21 Day	60 Day	90 Day	Yearly

1961	5.639	5.565	5.318	4.933	4.654	1.646

1962	3.187	3.16	3.049	2.826	2.676	2.142

1963	2.42	2.394	2.328	2.285	2.191	1.565

1964	2.495	2.467	2.356	2.141	2.072	1.487

1965	5.198	5.133	4.882	4.666	4.393	2.318

1966	3.098	3.073	2.968	2.753	2.609	2.161

1967	2.8	2.768	2.643	2.523	2.54	1.736

1968	9.874	9.763	9.299	8.375	7.798	3.644

1969	5.268	5.225	5.053	4.702	4.456	3.236

1970	4.187	4.143	3.995	3.914	3.766	2.395

1971	2.964	2.939	2.839	2.635	2.498	2.043

1972	3.424	3.389	3.311	3.185	3.096	1.986

1973	3.548	3.507	3.389	3.269	3.283	2.138

1974	3.011	2.983	2.873	2.658	2.51	2.062

1975	11.89	11.78	11.48	10.56	9.851	4.105

1976	6.486	6.431	6.209	5.752	5.442	4.164

1977	3.444	3.417	3.304	3.077	2.938	2.538

1978	3.491	3.466	3.343	3.064	2.877	1.986

1979	2.257	2.238	2.161	2.002	1.901	1.581

1980	3.427	3.388	3.241	2.972	2.797	1.674

1981	4.722	4.669	4.475	4.235	4.057	2.34

1982	3.273	3.238	3.192	3.062	3.032	2.367

1983	3.71	3.667	3.519	3.364	3.196	2.18

1984	2.794	2.764	2.652	2.529	2.461	1.944

1985	9.035	8.925	8.509	7.739	7.224	3.259

1986	9.777	9.676	9.429	8.8	8.316	4.942

1987	6.892	6.815	6.587	6.029	5.727	4.571

1988	4.695	4.646	4.472	4.176	4.117	3.3

1989	5.335	5.274	5.051	4.598	4.38	2.976

1990	3.756	3.717	3.571	3.452	3.408	2.602

Sorted results

Prob.	Peak	96 hr	21 Day	60 Day	90 Day	Yearly

0.032258064516129	11.89	11.78	11.48	10.56	9.851	4.942

0.0645161290322581	9.874	9.763	9.429	8.8	8.316	4.571

0.0967741935483871	9.777	9.676	9.299	8.375	7.798	4.164

0.129032258064516	9.035	8.925	8.509	7.739	7.224	4.105

0.161290322580645	6.892	6.815	6.587	6.029	5.727	3.644

0.193548387096774	6.486	6.431	6.209	5.752	5.442	3.3

0.225806451612903	5.639	5.565	5.318	4.933	4.654	3.259

0.258064516129032	5.335	5.274	5.053	4.702	4.456	3.236

0.290322580645161	5.268	5.225	5.051	4.666	4.393	2.976

0.32258064516129	5.198	5.133	4.882	4.598	4.38	2.602

0.354838709677419	4.722	4.669	4.475	4.235	4.117	2.538

0.387096774193548	4.695	4.646	4.472	4.176	4.057	2.395

0.419354838709677	4.187	4.143	3.995	3.914	3.766	2.367

0.451612903225806	3.756	3.717	3.571	3.452	3.408	2.34

0.483870967741936	3.71	3.667	3.519	3.364	3.283	2.318

0.516129032258065	3.548	3.507	3.389	3.269	3.196	2.18

0.548387096774194	3.491	3.466	3.343	3.185	3.096	2.161

0.580645161290323	3.444	3.417	3.311	3.077	3.032	2.142

0.612903225806452	3.427	3.389	3.304	3.064	2.938	2.138

0.645161290322581	3.424	3.388	3.241	3.062	2.877	2.062

0.67741935483871	3.273	3.238	3.192	2.972	2.797	2.043

0.709677419354839	3.187	3.16	3.049	2.826	2.676	1.986

0.741935483870968	3.098	3.073	2.968	2.753	2.609	1.986

0.774193548387097	3.011	2.983	2.873	2.658	2.54	1.944

0.806451612903226	2.964	2.939	2.839	2.635	2.51	1.736

0.838709677419355	2.8	2.768	2.652	2.529	2.498	1.674

0.870967741935484	2.794	2.764	2.643	2.523	2.461	1.646

0.903225806451613	2.495	2.467	2.356	2.285	2.191	1.581

0.935483870967742	2.42	2.394	2.328	2.141	2.072	1.565

0.967741935483871	2.257	2.238	2.161	2.002	1.901	1.487

0.1	9.7028	9.6009	9.22	8.3114	7.7406	4.1581

Average of yearly averages:	2.5696

Inputs generated by pe4.pl - 8-August-2003

Data used for this run:

Output File: flubmi

Metfile:	w14826.dvf

PRZM scenario:	MIbeansC.txt

EXAMS environment file:	ir298.exv

Chemical Name:	flutriafol

Description	Variable Name	Value	Units	Comments

Molecular weight	mwt	301	g/mol

Henry's Law Const.	henry	1.3E-11	atm-m^3/mol

Vapor Pressure	vapr	3E-09	torr

Solubility	sol	95	mg/L

Kd	Kd		mg/L

Koc	Koc	255	mg/L

Photolysis half-life	kdp	0	days	Half-life

Aerobic Aquatic Metabolism	kbacw	1000	days	Halfife

Anaerobic Aquatic Metabolism	kbacs	3500	days	Halfife

Aerobic Soil Metabolism	asm	1747	days	Halfife

Hydrolysis:	pH 7	0	days	Half-life

Method:	CAM	2	integer	See PRZM manual

Incorporation Depth:	DEPI	0	cm

Application Rate:	TAPP	0.0637	kg/ha

Application Efficiency:	APPEFF	0.95	fraction

Spray Drift	DRFT	0.16	fraction of application rate applied to pond

Application Date	Date	27-07	dd/mm or dd/mmm or dd-mm or dd-mmm

Interval 1	interval	14	days	Set to 0 or delete line for single app.

Record 17:	FILTRA

IPSCND

UPTKF

Record 18:	PLVKRT

PLDKRT

FEXTRC	0.5

Flag for Index Res. Run	IR	IR

Flag for runoff calc.	RUNOFF	total	none, monthly or total(average of entire run)

-------------------------

PRZM environment: MSsoybeanC.txt	modified Satday, 12 October 2002 at 17:07:44

EXAMS environment: ir298.exv	modified Thuday, 29 August 2002 at 15:34:12

Metfile: w13893.dvf	modified Wedday, 3 July 2002 at 09:06:20

Water segment concentrations (ppb)

Year	Peak	96 hr	21 Day	60 Day	90 Day	Yearly

1961	3.177	3.101	2.853	2.505	1.856	0.5011

1962	2.383	2.325	2.113	1.843	1.672	1.086

1963	1.567	1.529	1.383	1.205	1.08	0.6425

1964	2.107	2.059	1.972	1.709	1.61	0.8389

1965	3.327	3.263	3.118	2.631	2.296	1.103

1966	2.448	2.388	2.168	1.789	1.629	0.9192

1967	2.488	2.43	2.265	1.69	1.527	0.7947

1968	5.557	5.417	4.952	4.326	3.882	1.586

1969	3.375	3.294	3.018	2.254	1.735	1.143

1970	2.798	2.736	2.498	2.081	1.87	1.28

1971	1.784	1.743	1.608	0.9949	0.9401	0.652

1972	4.497	4.383	3.959	3.758	3.446	1.3

1973	2.691	2.626	2.448	2.131	1.962	1.218

1974	1.418	1.386	1.351	1.209	1.076	0.6875

1975	2.606	2.553	2.347	2.088	1.891	0.8271

1976	4.181	4.083	3.753	3.294	3.28	1.417

1977	4.241	4.149	3.863	3.241	2.935	1.41

1978	3.744	3.661	3.448	2.545	2.076	1.091

1979	2.86	2.798	2.556	2.117	2.047	1.368

1980	3.255	3.173	2.88	2.713	2.568	1.187

1981	6.088	5.936	5.639	4.677	3.794	1.484

1982	3.453	3.39	3.139	2.704	2.51	1.54

1983	3.006	2.936	2.765	2.258	1.924	1.068

1984	2.207	2.154	2.002	1.768	1.583	0.9988

1985	1.735	1.693	1.581	1.461	1.395	0.7179

1986	6.986	6.869	6.289	5.184	4.018	1.342

1987	5.003	4.884	4.541	3.722	2.9	1.821

1988	3.251	3.182	2.914	2.426	2.137	1.459

1989	3.993	3.898	3.582	3.445	3.225	1.394

1990	3.706	3.624	3.315	2.973	2.727	1.363

Sorted results

Prob.	Peak	96 hr	21 Day	60 Day	90 Day	Yearly

0.032258064516129	6.986	6.869	6.289	5.184	4.018	1.821

0.0645161290322581	6.088	5.936	5.639	4.677	3.882	1.586

0.0967741935483871	5.557	5.417	4.952	4.326	3.794	1.54

0.129032258064516	5.003	4.884	4.541	3.758	3.446	1.484

0.161290322580645	4.497	4.383	3.959	3.722	3.28	1.459

0.193548387096774	4.241	4.149	3.863	3.445	3.225	1.417

0.225806451612903	4.181	4.083	3.753	3.294	2.935	1.41

0.258064516129032	3.993	3.898	3.582	3.241	2.9	1.394

0.290322580645161	3.744	3.661	3.448	2.973	2.727	1.368

0.32258064516129	3.706	3.624	3.315	2.713	2.568	1.363

0.354838709677419	3.453	3.39	3.139	2.704	2.51	1.342

0.387096774193548	3.375	3.294	3.118	2.631	2.296	1.3

0.419354838709677	3.327	3.263	3.018	2.545	2.137	1.28

0.451612903225806	3.255	3.182	2.914	2.505	2.076	1.218

0.483870967741936	3.251	3.173	2.88	2.426	2.047	1.187

0.516129032258065	3.177	3.101	2.853	2.258	1.962	1.143

0.548387096774194	3.006	2.936	2.765	2.254	1.924	1.103

0.580645161290323	2.86	2.798	2.556	2.131	1.891	1.091

0.612903225806452	2.798	2.736	2.498	2.117	1.87	1.086

0.645161290322581	2.691	2.626	2.448	2.088	1.856	1.068

0.67741935483871	2.606	2.553	2.347	2.081	1.735	0.9988

0.709677419354839	2.488	2.43	2.265	1.843	1.672	0.9192

0.741935483870968	2.448	2.388	2.168	1.789	1.629	0.8389

0.774193548387097	2.383	2.325	2.113	1.768	1.61	0.8271

0.806451612903226	2.207	2.154	2.002	1.709	1.583	0.7947

0.838709677419355	2.107	2.059	1.972	1.69	1.527	0.7179

0.870967741935484	1.784	1.743	1.608	1.461	1.395	0.6875

0.903225806451613	1.735	1.693	1.581	1.209	1.08	0.652

0.935483870967742	1.567	1.529	1.383	1.205	1.076	0.6425

0.967741935483871	1.418	1.386	1.351	0.9949	0.9401	0.5011

0.1	5.5016	5.3637	4.9109	4.2692	3.7592	1.5344

Average of yearly averages:	1.14132333333333

Inputs generated by pe4.pl - 8-August-2003

Data used for this run:

Output File: flusbi

Metfile:	w13893.dvf

PRZM scenario:	MSsoybeanC.txt

EXAMS environment file:	ir298.exv

Chemical Name:	flutriafol

Description	Variable Name	Value	Units	Comments

Molecular weight	mwt	301	g/mol

Henry's Law Const.	henry	1.3E-11	atm-m^3/mol

Vapor Pressure	vapr	3E-09	torr

Solubility	sol	95	mg/L

Kd	Kd		mg/L

Koc	Koc	255	mg/L

Photolysis half-life	kdp	0	days	Half-life

Aerobic Aquatic Metabolism	kbacw	1000	days	Halfife

Anaerobic Aquatic Metabolism	kbacs	3500	days	Halfife

Aerobic Soil Metabolism	asm	1747	days	Halfife

Hydrolysis:	pH 7	0	days	Half-life

Method:	CAM	2	integer	See PRZM manual

Incorporation Depth:	DEPI	0	cm

Application Rate:	TAPP	0.0637	kg/ha

Application Efficiency:	APPEFF	0.95	fraction

Spray Drift	DRFT	0.16	fraction of application rate applied to pond

Application Date	Date	01-09	dd/mm or dd/mmm or dd-mm or dd-mmm

Interval 1	interval	14	days	Set to 0 or delete line for single app.

Record 17:	FILTRA

IPSCND

UPTKF

Record 18:	PLVKRT

PLDKRT

FEXTRC	0.5

Flag for Index Res. Run	IR	IR

Flag for runoff calc.	RUNOFF	total	none, monthly or total(average of entire run)

-------------------

PRZM environment: GAsoybeanC.txt	modified Friday, 14 October 2005 at 15:22:04

EXAMS environment: pond298.exv	modified Thuday, 29 August 2002 at 16:33:30

Metfile: w93805.dvf	modified Wedday, 3 July 2002 at 09:04:32

Water segment concentrations (ppb)

Year	Peak	96 hr	21 Day	60 Day	90 Day	Yearly

1961	1.988	1.976	1.848	1.306	1.154	0.3452

1962	4.844	4.809	4.679	4.534	4.527	2.515

1963	8.296	8.251	8.08	7.77	7.705	5.08

1964	12.83	12.78	12.57	12.3	12.09	8.488

1965	14.91	14.86	14.68	14.45	14.3	12.14

1966	19	18.92	18.73	18.38	18.13	14.57

1967	18.03	18	17.91	17.78	17.41	16.6

1968	20.61	20.57	20.39	20.29	20.19	17.88

1969	30.59	30.45	29.87	28.86	28.36	21.53

1970	26.96	26.93	26.83	26.63	26.49	25.33

1971	24.68	24.66	24.61	24.5	24.41	23.54

1972	24.29	24.25	24.12	23.54	23.16	22.36

1973	23.86	23.83	23.73	23.55	23.4	22.48

1974	23.71	23.67	23.46	23.18	23	21.81

1975	22.58	22.54	22.42	22.29	22.18	21.57

1976	25.06	24.99	24.77	24.43	24.11	21.62

1977	23.73	23.71	23.64	23.5	23.38	22.19

1978	21.3	21.3	21.26	21.19	21.12	20.15

1979	21.21	21.15	20.97	20.72	20.64	19.49

1980	20.36	20.35	20.29	20.17	20.08	19.36

1981	19.28	19.27	19.23	19.14	19.06	18.48

1982	18.71	18.67	18.52	18.38	18.3	17.79

1983	18.65	18.63	18.55	17.93	17.72	17.25

1984	18.48	18.46	18.38	18.24	18.14	17.35

1985	19.23	19.18	19.04	18.97	17.92	16.67

1986	18.82	18.8	18.74	18.47	18.36	17.86

1987	18.63	18.59	18.49	18.37	18.28	17.62

1988	18.46	18.44	18.37	18.16	18.18	17.55

1989	19.77	19.72	19.55	19.33	19.21	17.81

1990	18.87	18.85	18.79	18.65	18.54	17.84

Sorted results

Prob.	Peak	96 hr	21 Day	60 Day	90 Day	Yearly

0.032258064516129	30.59	30.45	29.87	28.86	28.36	25.33

0.0645161290322581	26.96	26.93	26.83	26.63	26.49	23.54

0.0967741935483871	25.06	24.99	24.77	24.5	24.41	22.48

0.129032258064516	24.68	24.66	24.61	24.43	24.11	22.36

0.161290322580645	24.29	24.25	24.12	23.55	23.4	22.19

0.193548387096774	23.86	23.83	23.73	23.54	23.38	21.81

0.225806451612903	23.73	23.71	23.64	23.5	23.16	21.62

0.258064516129032	23.71	23.67	23.46	23.18	23	21.57

0.290322580645161	22.58	22.54	22.42	22.29	22.18	21.53

0.32258064516129	21.3	21.3	21.26	21.19	21.12	20.15

0.354838709677419	21.21	21.15	20.97	20.72	20.64	19.49

0.387096774193548	20.61	20.57	20.39	20.29	20.19	19.36

0.419354838709677	20.36	20.35	20.29	20.17	20.08	18.48

0.451612903225806	19.77	19.72	19.55	19.33	19.21	17.88

0.483870967741936	19.28	19.27	19.23	19.14	19.06	17.86

0.516129032258065	19.23	19.18	19.04	18.97	18.54	17.84

0.548387096774194	19	18.92	18.79	18.65	18.36	17.81

0.580645161290323	18.87	18.85	18.74	18.47	18.3	17.79

0.612903225806452	18.82	18.8	18.73	18.38	18.28	17.62

0.645161290322581	18.71	18.67	18.55	18.38	18.18	17.55

0.67741935483871	18.65	18.63	18.52	18.37	18.14	17.35

0.709677419354839	18.63	18.59	18.49	18.24	18.13	17.25

0.741935483870968	18.48	18.46	18.38	18.16	17.92	16.67

0.774193548387097	18.46	18.44	18.37	17.93	17.72	16.6

0.806451612903226	18.03	18	17.91	17.78	17.41	14.57

0.838709677419355	14.91	14.86	14.68	14.45	14.3	12.14

0.870967741935484	12.83	12.78	12.57	12.3	12.09	8.488

0.903225806451613	8.296	8.251	8.08	7.77	7.705	5.08

0.935483870967742	4.844	4.809	4.679	4.534	4.527	2.515

0.967741935483871	1.988	1.976	1.848	1.306	1.154	0.3452

0.1	25.022	24.957	24.754	24.493	24.38	22.468

Average of yearly averages:	17.1756066666667

Inputs generated by pe4.pl - 8-August-2003

Data used for this run:

Output File: flusbp

Metfile:	w93805.dvf

PRZM scenario:	GAsoybeanC.txt

EXAMS environment file:	pond298.exv

Chemical Name:	flutriafol

Description	Variable Name	Value	Units	Comments

Molecular weight	mwt	301	g/mol

Henry's Law Const.	henry	1.3E-11	atm-m^3/mol

Vapor Pressure	vapr	3E-09	torr

Solubility	sol	95	mg/L

Kd	Kd		mg/L

Koc	Koc	255	mg/L

Photolysis half-life	kdp	0	days	Half-life

Aerobic Aquatic Metabolism	kbacw	1000	days	Halfife

Anaerobic Aquatic Metabolism	kbacs	3600	days	Halfife

Aerobic Soil Metabolism	asm	1747	days	Halfife

Hydrolysis:	pH 7	0	days	Half-life

Method:	CAM	2	integer	See PRZM manual

Incorporation Depth:	DEPI	0	cm

Application Rate:	TAPP	0.125	kg/ha

Application Efficiency:	APPEFF	0.95	fraction

Spray Drift	DRFT	0.05	fraction of application rate applied to pond

Application Date	Date	01-09	dd/mm or dd/mmm or dd-mm or dd-mmm

Interval 1	interval	14	days	Set to 0 or delete line for single app.

Record 17:	FILTRA

IPSCND

UPTKF

Record 18:	PLVKRT

PLDKRT

FEXTRC	0.5

Flag for Index Res. Run	IR	Pond

Flag for runoff calc.	RUNOFF	none	none, monthly or total(average of entire run)

-------------------

PRZM environment: MIbeansC.txt	modified Monday, 10 May 2004 at 07:24:24

EXAMS environment: pond298.exv	modified Thuday, 29 August 2002 at 16:33:30

Metfile: w14826.dvf	modified Wedday, 3 July 2002 at 09:05:38

Water segment concentrations (ppb)

Year	Peak	96 hr	21 Day	60 Day	90 Day	Yearly

1961	2.433	2.413	2.345	2.293	2.26	0.8431

1962	2.56	2.555	2.543	2.521	2.508	2.203

1963	3.12	3.114	3.092	3.059	3.054	2.679

1964	3.671	3.664	3.637	3.594	3.586	3.201

1965	5.299	5.284	5.229	5.191	5.15	4.146

1966	5.322	5.315	5.3	5.281	5.262	5.05

1967	5.934	5.929	5.912	5.889	5.86	5.415

1968	9.309	9.279	9.155	8.937	8.825	6.898

1969	8.521	8.516	8.501	8.475	8.455	8.33

1970	9.345	9.334	9.298	9.247	9.231	8.572

1971	9.141	9.138	9.125	9.099	9.082	8.973

1972	9.711	9.703	9.679	9.641	9.63	9.169

1973	10.17	10.16	10.13	10.08	10.03	9.551

1974	10.1	10.09	10.07	10.04	10.02	9.888

1975	14.07	14.04	13.93	13.72	13.57	11.07

1976	13.13	13.12	13.07	13.01	12.98	12.75

1977	12.92	12.91	12.89	12.86	12.84	12.68

1978	12.95	12.94	12.89	12.8	12.76	12.52

1979	12.64	12.64	12.62	12.59	12.57	12.31

1980	12.63	12.61	12.57	12.49	12.45	12.1

1981	13.26	13.25	13.2	13.11	13.06	12.42

1982	12.99	12.98	12.96	12.92	12.92	12.73

1983	13.13	13.11	13.05	13.03	13	12.71

1984	12.87	12.86	12.85	12.82	12.79	12.64

1985	15.32	15.29	15.16	14.96	14.85	13.18

1986	16.95	16.92	16.84	16.67	16.58	14.94

1987	16.99	16.97	16.89	16.75	16.68	16.12

1988	16.61	16.59	16.54	16.48	16.46	16.22

1989	17.09	17.06	16.99	16.85	16.78	16.3

1990	16.58	16.57	16.54	16.51	16.48	16.31

Sorted results

Prob.	Peak	96 hr	21 Day	60 Day	90 Day	Yearly

0.032258064516129	17.09	17.06	16.99	16.85	16.78	16.31

0.0645161290322581	16.99	16.97	16.89	16.75	16.68	16.3

0.0967741935483871	16.95	16.92	16.84	16.67	16.58	16.22

0.129032258064516	16.61	16.59	16.54	16.51	16.48	16.12

0.161290322580645	16.58	16.57	16.54	16.48	16.46	14.94

0.193548387096774	15.32	15.29	15.16	14.96	14.85	13.18

0.225806451612903	14.07	14.04	13.93	13.72	13.57	12.75

0.258064516129032	13.26	13.25	13.2	13.11	13.06	12.73

0.290322580645161	13.13	13.12	13.07	13.03	13	12.71

0.32258064516129	13.13	13.11	13.05	13.01	12.98	12.68

0.354838709677419	12.99	12.98	12.96	12.92	12.92	12.64

0.387096774193548	12.95	12.94	12.89	12.86	12.84	12.52

0.419354838709677	12.92	12.91	12.89	12.82	12.79	12.42

0.451612903225806	12.87	12.86	12.85	12.8	12.76	12.31

0.483870967741936	12.64	12.64	12.62	12.59	12.57	12.1

0.516129032258065	12.63	12.61	12.57	12.49	12.45	11.07

0.548387096774194	10.17	10.16	10.13	10.08	10.03	9.888

0.580645161290323	10.1	10.09	10.07	10.04	10.02	9.551

0.612903225806452	9.711	9.703	9.679	9.641	9.63	9.169

0.645161290322581	9.345	9.334	9.298	9.247	9.231	8.973

0.67741935483871	9.309	9.279	9.155	9.099	9.082	8.572

0.709677419354839	9.141	9.138	9.125	8.937	8.825	8.33

0.741935483870968	8.521	8.516	8.501	8.475	8.455	6.898

0.774193548387097	5.934	5.929	5.912	5.889	5.86	5.415

0.806451612903226	5.322	5.315	5.3	5.281	5.262	5.05

0.838709677419355	5.299	5.284	5.229	5.191	5.15	4.146

0.870967741935484	3.671	3.664	3.637	3.594	3.586	3.201

0.903225806451613	3.12	3.114	3.092	3.059	3.054	2.679

0.935483870967742	2.56	2.555	2.543	2.521	2.508	2.203

0.967741935483871	2.433	2.413	2.345	2.293	2.26	0.8431

0.1	16.916	16.887	16.81	16.654	16.57	16.21

Average of yearly averages:	10.0639366666667

Inputs generated by pe4.pl - 8-August-2003

Data used for this run:

Output File: flubmp

Metfile:	w14826.dvf

PRZM scenario:	MIbeansC.txt

EXAMS environment file:	pond298.exv

Chemical Name:	flutriafol

Description	Variable Name	Value	Units	Comments

Molecular weight	mwt	301	g/mol

Henry's Law Const.	henry	1.3E-11	atm-m^3/mol

Vapor Pressure	vapr	3E-09	torr

Solubility	sol	95	mg/L

Kd	Kd		mg/L

Koc	Koc	255	mg/L

Photolysis half-life	kdp	0	days	Half-life

Aerobic Aquatic Metabolism	kbacw	1000	days	Halfife

Anaerobic Aquatic Metabolism	kbacs	3500	days	Halfife

Aerobic Soil Metabolism	asm	1747	days	Halfife

Hydrolysis:	pH 7	0	days	Half-life

Method:	CAM	2	integer	See PRZM manual

Incorporation Depth:	DEPI	0	cm

Application Rate:	TAPP	0.0637	kg/ha

Application Efficiency:	APPEFF	0.95	fraction

Spray Drift	DRFT	0.05	fraction of application rate applied to pond

Application Date	Date	27-07	dd/mm or dd/mmm or dd-mm or dd-mmm

Interval 1	interval	14	days	Set to 0 or delete line for single app.

Record 17:	FILTRA

IPSCND

UPTKF

Record 18:	PLVKRT

PLDKRT

FEXTRC	0.5

Flag for Index Res. Run	IR	Pond

Flag for runoff calc.	RUNOFF	none	none, monthly or total(average of entire run)

---------------------------------

PRZM environment: MSsoybeanC.txt	modified Satday, 12 October 2002 at 17:07:44

EXAMS environment: pond298.exv	modified Thuday, 29 August 2002 at 16:33:30

Metfile: w13893.dvf	modified Wedday, 3 July 2002 at 09:06:20

Water segment concentrations (ppb)

Year	Peak	96 hr	21 Day	60 Day	90 Day	Yearly

1961	1.613	1.604	1.58	1.384	1.029	0.2744

1962	2.16	2.15	2.123	2.107	2.102	1.586

1963	2.618	2.614	2.599	2.438	2.414	2.109

1964	3.516	3.511	3.485	3.318	3.212	2.72

1965	4.432	4.416	4.366	4.285	4.233	3.547

1966	4.754	4.742	4.702	4.64	4.633	4.2

1967	5.344	5.334	5.322	5.038	4.915	4.568

1968	6.962	6.94	6.855	6.771	6.742	5.498

1969	7.331	7.308	7.169	6.868	6.598	6.376

1970	7.484	7.471	7.449	7.384	7.31	7.004

1971	7.248	7.244	7.23	7.198	7.174	6.921

1972	8.42	8.404	8.363	8.282	8.202	7.169

1973	8.255	8.236	8.201	8.155	8.145	7.87

1974	8.071	8.066	8.048	8.01	7.978	7.694

1975	8.104	8.095	8.062	8.013	7.879	7.53

1976	9.156	9.137	9.092	8.996	8.858	7.986

1977	9.46	9.434	9.366	9.263	9.241	8.624

1978	9.761	9.746	9.694	9.24	9.038	8.771

1979	9.616	9.607	9.572	9.506	9.458	9.2

1980	9.729	9.718	9.685	9.64	9.596	9.187

1981	10.94	10.91	10.85	10.72	10.36	9.391

1982	10.6	10.58	10.55	10.47	10.45	10.11

1983	10.54	10.53	10.51	10.38	10.35	10.01

1984	10.42	10.42	10.39	10.33	10.29	9.907

1985	9.84	9.837	9.824	9.794	9.762	9.409

1986	11.3	11.29	11.2	10.96	10.29	9.268

1987	11.48	11.46	11.42	11.15	10.7	10.31

1988	11.26	11.25	11.21	11.14	11.09	10.68

1989	11.49	11.47	11.41	11.37	11.33	10.64

1990	11.51	11.49	11.42	11.32	11.28	10.88

Sorted results

Prob.	Peak	96 hr	21 Day	60 Day	90 Day	Yearly

0.032258064516129	11.51	11.49	11.42	11.37	11.33	10.88

0.0645161290322581	11.49	11.47	11.42	11.32	11.28	10.68

0.0967741935483871	11.48	11.46	11.41	11.15	11.09	10.64

0.129032258064516	11.3	11.29	11.21	11.14	10.7	10.31

0.161290322580645	11.26	11.25	11.2	10.96	10.45	10.11

0.193548387096774	10.94	10.91	10.85	10.72	10.36	10.01

0.225806451612903	10.6	10.58	10.55	10.47	10.35	9.907

0.258064516129032	10.54	10.53	10.51	10.38	10.29	9.409

0.290322580645161	10.42	10.42	10.39	10.33	10.29	9.391

0.32258064516129	9.84	9.837	9.824	9.794	9.762	9.268

0.354838709677419	9.761	9.746	9.694	9.64	9.596	9.2

0.387096774193548	9.729	9.718	9.685	9.506	9.458	9.187

0.419354838709677	9.616	9.607	9.572	9.263	9.241	8.771

0.451612903225806	9.46	9.434	9.366	9.24	9.038	8.624

0.483870967741936	9.156	9.137	9.092	8.996	8.858	7.986

0.516129032258065	8.42	8.404	8.363	8.282	8.202	7.87

0.548387096774194	8.255	8.236	8.201	8.155	8.145	7.694

0.580645161290323	8.104	8.095	8.062	8.013	7.978	7.53

0.612903225806452	8.071	8.066	8.048	8.01	7.879	7.169

0.645161290322581	7.484	7.471	7.449	7.384	7.31	7.004

0.67741935483871	7.331	7.308	7.23	7.198	7.174	6.921

0.709677419354839	7.248	7.244	7.169	6.868	6.742	6.376

0.741935483870968	6.962	6.94	6.855	6.771	6.598	5.498

0.774193548387097	5.344	5.334	5.322	5.038	4.915	4.568

0.806451612903226	4.754	4.742	4.702	4.64	4.633	4.2

0.838709677419355	4.432	4.416	4.366	4.285	4.233	3.547

0.870967741935484	3.516	3.511	3.485	3.318	3.212	2.72

0.903225806451613	2.618	2.614	2.599	2.438	2.414	2.109

0.935483870967742	2.16	2.15	2.123	2.107	2.102	1.586

0.967741935483871	1.613	1.604	1.58	1.384	1.029	0.2744

0.1	11.462	11.443	11.39	11.149	11.051	10.607

Average of yearly averages:	7.31464666666667

Inputs generated by pe4.pl - 8-August-2003

Data used for this run:

Output File: flusbr

Metfile:	w13893.dvf

PRZM scenario:	MSsoybeanC.txt

EXAMS environment file:	pond298.exv

Chemical Name:	flutriafol

Description	Variable Name	Value	Units	Comments

Molecular weight	mwt	301	g/mol

Henry's Law Const.	henry	1.3E-11	atm-m^3/mol

Vapor Pressure	vapr	3E-09	torr

Solubility	sol	95	mg/L

Kd	Kd		mg/L

Koc	Koc	255	mg/L

Photolysis half-life	kdp	0	days	Half-life

Aerobic Aquatic Metabolism	kbacw	1000	days	Halfife

Anaerobic Aquatic Metabolism	kbacs	3500	days	Halfife

Aerobic Soil Metabolism	asm	1747	days	Halfife

Hydrolysis:	pH 7	0	days	Half-life

Method:	CAM	2	integer	See PRZM manual

Incorporation Depth:	DEPI	0	cm

Application Rate:	TAPP	0.0637	kg/ha

Application Efficiency:	APPEFF	0.95	fraction

Spray Drift	DRFT	0.05	fraction of application rate applied to pond

Application Date	Date	01-09	dd/mm or dd/mmm or dd-mm or dd-mmm

Interval 1	interval	14	days	Set to 0 or delete line for single app.

Record 17:	FILTRA

IPSCND

UPTKF

Record 18:	PLVKRT

PLDKRT

FEXTRC	0.5

Flag for Index Res. Run	IR	Pond

Flag for runoff calc.	RUNOFF	none	none, monthly or total(average of entire run)

Appendix B.  SCI-GROW Print-out

	SCIGROW -  VERSION 2.3

	ENVIRONMENTAL FATE AND EFFECTS DIVISION

	OFFICE OF PESTICIDE PROGRAMS

U.S. ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY

	SCREENING MODEL FOR AQUATIC PESTICIDE EXPOSURE

 SciGrow version 2.3

 chemical:flutriafol

 time is 11/25/2005  13:39:43

 ----------------------------------------------------------------------- ----------------------------------------------------------------

  Application	Number of	Total Use	 Koc	    Soil Aerobic

  rate (lb/acre)	applications	(lb/acre/yr)	(ml/g)	 metabolism (days)

 ----------------------------------------------------------------------- ------------------------------------------------------------

      0.057	      2.0	   0.114	2.95E+02	      1747.0

 ----------------------------------------------------------------------- -------------------------------

 groundwater screening cond (ppb) =   5.83E-01

 *********************************************************************** *

Appendix C.  Identity of Endangered Avian and Mammalian Species Located in Soybean Producing Counties.

Species Details by State for Preliminary Assessment

 ADVANCE \d1 	Soybeans (176)

 ADVANCE \d1 	Minimum of 1 Acre.

 ADVANCE \d19 	Alabama	(8 species)

Group	Critical Habitat

 ADVANCE \d3 	BAT, GRAY	Mammal	No

 ADVANCE \d4 	BAT, INDIANA	Mammal	Yes

 ADVANCE \d4 	EAGLE, BALD	Bird	No

 ADVANCE \d4 	MOUSE, ALABAMA BEACH	Mammal	Yes

 ADVANCE \d4 	MOUSE, PERDIDO KEY BEACH	Mammal	Yes

 ADVANCE \d4 	PLOVER, PIPING	Bird	Yes

 ADVANCE \d4 	STORK, WOOD	Bird	No

 ADVANCE \d4 	WOODPECKER, RED-COCKADED	Bird	No

 ADVANCE \d11 	Arkansas	(5 species)

Group	Critical Habitat

 ADVANCE \d3 	BAT, GRAY	Mammal	No

 ADVANCE \d4 	BAT, INDIANA	Mammal	Yes

 ADVANCE \d4 	EAGLE, BALD	Bird	No

 ADVANCE \d4 	TERN, INTERIOR (POPULATION) LEAST	Bird	No

 ADVANCE \d4 	WOODPECKER, RED-COCKADED	Bird	No

 ADVANCE \d11 	Delaware	(4 species)

Group	Critical Habitat

 ADVANCE \d3 	EAGLE, BALD	Bird	No

 ADVANCE \d4 	PLOVER, PIPING	Bird	Yes

 ADVANCE \d4 	SQUIRREL, DELMARVA PENINSULA FOX	Mammal	No

 ADVANCE \d4 	WHALE, NORTHERN RIGHT	Mammal	Yes

 ADVANCE \d11 	Florida	(12 species)

Group	Critical Habitat

 ADVANCE \d3 	BAT, GRAY	Mammal	No

 ADVANCE \d4 	BAT, INDIANA	Mammal	Yes

 ADVANCE \d4 	EAGLE, BALD	Bird	No

 ADVANCE \d18 Thursday, July 28, 2005	Page 1 of 9

 ADVANCE \d2 	JAY, FLORIDA SCRUB	Bird	No

 ADVANCE \d4 	KITE, EVERGLADE SNAIL	Bird	Yes

 ADVANCE \d4 	MANATEE, WEST INDIAN (FLORIDA)	Mammal	Yes

 ADVANCE \d4 	MOUSE, CHOCTAWHATCHEE BEACH	Mammal	Yes

 ADVANCE \d4 	MOUSE, PERDIDO KEY BEACH	Mammal	Yes

 ADVANCE \d4 	PLOVER, PIPING	Bird	Yes

 ADVANCE \d4 	STORK, WOOD	Bird	No

 ADVANCE \d4 	WHALE, NORTHERN RIGHT	Mammal	Yes

 ADVANCE \d4 	WOODPECKER, RED-COCKADED	Bird	No

 ADVANCE \d11 	Georgia	(8 species)

Group	Critical Habitat

 ADVANCE \d3 	BAT, GRAY	Mammal	No

 ADVANCE \d4 	BAT, INDIANA	Mammal	Yes

 ADVANCE \d4 	EAGLE, BALD	Bird	No

 ADVANCE \d4 	MANATEE, WEST INDIAN (FLORIDA)	Mammal	Yes

 ADVANCE \d4 	PLOVER, PIPING	Bird	Yes

 ADVANCE \d4 	STORK, WOOD	Bird	No

 ADVANCE \d4 	WARBLER (WOOD), KIRTLAND'S	Bird	No

 ADVANCE \d4 	WOODPECKER, RED-COCKADED	Bird	No

 ADVANCE \d11 	Illinois	(5 species)

Group	Critical Habitat

 ADVANCE \d3 	BAT, GRAY	Mammal	No

 ADVANCE \d4 	BAT, INDIANA	Mammal	Yes

 ADVANCE \d4 	EAGLE, BALD	Bird	No

 ADVANCE \d4 	PLOVER, PIPING	Bird	Yes

 ADVANCE \d4 	TERN, INTERIOR (POPULATION) LEAST	Bird	No

 ADVANCE \d11 	Indiana	(4 species)

Group	Critical Habitat

 ADVANCE \d3 	BAT, GRAY	Mammal	No

 ADVANCE \d4 	BAT, INDIANA	Mammal	Yes

 ADVANCE \d4 	EAGLE, BALD	Bird	No

 ADVANCE \d4 	TERN, INTERIOR (POPULATION) LEAST	Bird	No

 ADVANCE \d13 Thursday, July 28, 2005	Page 2 of 9

 ADVANCE \d9 	Iowa	(4 species)

Group	Critical Habitat

 ADVANCE \d3 	BAT, INDIANA	Mammal	Yes

 ADVANCE \d4 	EAGLE, BALD	Bird	No

 ADVANCE \d4 	PLOVER, PIPING	Bird	Yes

 ADVANCE \d4 	TERN, INTERIOR (POPULATION) LEAST	Bird	No

 ADVANCE \d11 	Kansas	(7 species)

Group	Critical Habitat

 ADVANCE \d3 	BAT, GRAY	Mammal	No

 ADVANCE \d4 	CRANE, WHOOPING	Bird	Yes

 ADVANCE \d4 	EAGLE, BALD	Bird	No

 ADVANCE \d4 	FERRET, BLACK-FOOTED	Mammal	No

 ADVANCE \d4 	PLOVER, MOUNTAIN	Bird	No

 ADVANCE \d4 	PLOVER, PIPING	Bird	Yes

 ADVANCE \d4 	TERN, INTERIOR (POPULATION) LEAST	Bird	No

 ADVANCE \d11 	Kentucky	(6 species)

Group	Critical Habitat

 ADVANCE \d3 	BAT, GRAY	Mammal	No

 ADVANCE \d4 	BAT, INDIANA	Mammal	Yes

 ADVANCE \d4 	BAT, VIRGINIA BIG-EARED	Mammal	Yes

 ADVANCE \d4 	EAGLE, BALD	Bird	No

 ADVANCE \d4 	TERN, INTERIOR (POPULATION) LEAST	Bird	No

 ADVANCE \d4 	WOODPECKER, RED-COCKADED	Bird	No

 ADVANCE \d11 	Louisiana	(8 species)

Group	Critical Habitat

 ADVANCE \d3 	BEAR, AMERICAN BLACK	Mammal	No

 ADVANCE \d4 	BEAR, LOUISIANA BLACK	Mammal	Yes

 ADVANCE \d4 	EAGLE, BALD	Bird	No

 ADVANCE \d4 	PELICAN, BROWN	Bird	No

 ADVANCE \d4 	PLOVER, PIPING	Bird	Yes

 ADVANCE \d4 	TERN, CALIFORNIA LEAST	Bird	No

 ADVANCE \d4 	TERN, INTERIOR (POPULATION) LEAST	Bird	No

 ADVANCE \d13 Thursday, July 28, 2005	Page 3 of 9

 ADVANCE \d2 	WOODPECKER, RED-COCKADED	Bird	No

 ADVANCE \d11 	Maine	(3 species)

Group	Critical Habitat

 ADVANCE \d3 	EAGLE, BALD	Bird	No

 ADVANCE \d4 	LYNX, CANADA	Mammal	No

 ADVANCE \d4 	WHALE, NORTHERN RIGHT	Mammal	Yes

 ADVANCE \d11 	Maryland	(5 species)

Group	Critical Habitat

 ADVANCE \d3 	BAT, INDIANA	Mammal	Yes

 ADVANCE \d4 	EAGLE, BALD	Bird	No

 ADVANCE \d4 	PLOVER, PIPING	Bird	Yes

 ADVANCE \d4 	SQUIRREL, DELMARVA PENINSULA FOX	Mammal	No

 ADVANCE \d4 	WHALE, NORTHERN RIGHT	Mammal	Yes

 ADVANCE \d11 	Massachusetts	(2 species)

Group	Critical Habitat

 ADVANCE \d3 	EAGLE, BALD	Bird	No

 ADVANCE \d4 	WHALE, NORTHERN RIGHT	Mammal	Yes

 ADVANCE \d11 	Michigan	(5 species)

Group	Critical Habitat

 ADVANCE \d3 	BAT, INDIANA	Mammal	Yes

 ADVANCE \d4 	EAGLE, BALD	Bird	No

 ADVANCE \d4 	PLOVER, PIPING	Bird	Yes

 ADVANCE \d4 	WARBLER (WOOD), KIRTLAND'S	Bird	No

 ADVANCE \d4 	WOLF, GRAY	Mammal	Yes

 ADVANCE \d11 	Minnesota	(3 species)

Group	Critical Habitat

 ADVANCE \d3 	EAGLE, BALD	Bird	No

 ADVANCE \d4 	PLOVER, PIPING	Bird	Yes

 ADVANCE \d4 	WOLF, GRAY	Mammal	Yes

 ADVANCE \d11 	Mississippi	(6 species)

Group	Critical Habitat

 ADVANCE \d3 	BEAR, LOUISIANA BLACK	Mammal	Yes

 ADVANCE \d12 Thursday, July 28, 2005	Page 4 of 9

 ADVANCE \d2 	CRANE, MISSISSIPPI SANDHILL	Bird	Yes

 ADVANCE \d4 	EAGLE, BALD	Bird	No

 ADVANCE \d4 	PELICAN, BROWN	Bird	No

 ADVANCE \d4 	TERN, INTERIOR (POPULATION) LEAST	Bird	No

 ADVANCE \d4 	WOODPECKER, RED-COCKADED	Bird	No

 ADVANCE \d11 	Missouri	(5 species)

Group	Critical Habitat

 ADVANCE \d3 	BAT, GRAY	Mammal	No

 ADVANCE \d4 	BAT, INDIANA	Mammal	Yes

 ADVANCE \d4 	EAGLE, BALD	Bird	No

 ADVANCE \d4 	PLOVER, PIPING	Bird	Yes

 ADVANCE \d4 	TERN, INTERIOR (POPULATION) LEAST	Bird	No

 ADVANCE \d11 	Nebraska	(5 species)

Group	Critical Habitat

 ADVANCE \d3 	CRANE, WHOOPING	Bird	Yes

 ADVANCE \d4 	EAGLE, BALD	Bird	No

 ADVANCE \d4 	FERRET, BLACK-FOOTED	Mammal	No

 ADVANCE \d4 	PLOVER, PIPING	Bird	Yes

 ADVANCE \d4 	TERN, INTERIOR (POPULATION) LEAST	Bird	No

 ADVANCE \d11 	New Jersey	(4 species)

Group	Critical Habitat

 ADVANCE \d3 	BAT, INDIANA	Mammal	Yes

 ADVANCE \d4 	EAGLE, BALD	Bird	No

 ADVANCE \d4 	PLOVER, PIPING	Bird	Yes

 ADVANCE \d4 	WHALE, NORTHERN RIGHT	Mammal	Yes

 ADVANCE \d11 	New York	(4 species)

Group	Critical Habitat

 ADVANCE \d3 	BAT, INDIANA	Mammal	Yes

 ADVANCE \d4 	EAGLE, BALD	Bird	No

 ADVANCE \d4 	PLOVER, PIPING	Bird	Yes

 ADVANCE \d4 	WHALE, NORTHERN RIGHT	Mammal	Yes

 ADVANCE \d32 Thursday, July 28, 2005	Page 5 of 9

 ADVANCE \d9 	North Carolina	(11 species)

Group	Critical Habitat

 ADVANCE \d3 	BAT, INDIANA	Mammal	Yes

 ADVANCE \d4 	CAHOW	Bird	No

 ADVANCE \d4 	EAGLE, BALD	Bird	No

 ADVANCE \d4 	MANATEE, WEST INDIAN (FLORIDA)	Mammal	Yes

 ADVANCE \d4 	PLOVER, PIPING	Bird	Yes

 ADVANCE \d4 	SQUIRREL, CAROLINA NORTHERN FLYING	Mammal	No

 ADVANCE \d4 	STORK, WOOD	Bird	No

 ADVANCE \d4 	TERN, ROSEATE	Bird	No

 ADVANCE \d4 	WHALE, NORTHERN RIGHT	Mammal	Yes

 ADVANCE \d4 	WOLF, RED	Mammal	No

 ADVANCE \d4 	WOODPECKER, RED-COCKADED	Bird	No

 ADVANCE \d11 	North Dakota	(4 species)

Group	Critical Habitat

 ADVANCE \d3 	CRANE, WHOOPING	Bird	Yes

 ADVANCE \d4 	EAGLE, BALD	Bird	No

 ADVANCE \d4 	PLOVER, PIPING	Bird	Yes

 ADVANCE \d4 	TERN, INTERIOR (POPULATION) LEAST	Bird	No

 ADVANCE \d11 	Ohio	(3 species)

Group	Critical Habitat

 ADVANCE \d3 	BAT, INDIANA	Mammal	Yes

 ADVANCE \d4 	EAGLE, BALD	Bird	No

 ADVANCE \d4 	PLOVER, PIPING	Bird	Yes

 ADVANCE \d11 	Oklahoma	(10 species)

Group	Critical Habitat

 ADVANCE \d3 	BAT, GRAY	Mammal	No

 ADVANCE \d4 	BAT, INDIANA	Mammal	Yes

 ADVANCE \d4 	BAT, OZARK BIG-EARED	Mammal	No

 ADVANCE \d4 	CRANE, WHOOPING	Bird	Yes

 ADVANCE \d4 	CURLEW, ESKIMO	Bird	No

 ADVANCE \d4 	EAGLE, BALD	Bird	No

 ADVANCE \d13 Thursday, July 28, 2005	Page 6 of 9

 ADVANCE \d2 	PLOVER, PIPING	Bird	Yes

 ADVANCE \d4 	TERN, INTERIOR (POPULATION) LEAST	Bird	No

 ADVANCE \d4 	VIREO, BLACK-CAPPED	Bird	No

 ADVANCE \d4 	WOODPECKER, RED-COCKADED	Bird	No

 ADVANCE \d11 	Pennsylvania	(4 species)

Group	Critical Habitat

 ADVANCE \d3 	BAT, INDIANA	Mammal	Yes

 ADVANCE \d4 	EAGLE, BALD	Bird	No

 ADVANCE \d4 	PLOVER, PIPING	Bird	Yes

 ADVANCE \d4 	SQUIRREL, DELMARVA PENINSULA FOX	Mammal	No

 ADVANCE \d11 	South Carolina	(7 species)

Group	Critical Habitat

 ADVANCE \d3 	EAGLE, BALD	Bird	No

 ADVANCE \d4 	MANATEE, WEST INDIAN (FLORIDA)	Mammal	Yes

 ADVANCE \d4 	PLOVER, PIPING	Bird	Yes

 ADVANCE \d4 	STORK, WOOD	Bird	No

 ADVANCE \d4 	WHALE, NORTHERN RIGHT	Mammal	Yes

 ADVANCE \d4 	WOLF, RED	Mammal	No

 ADVANCE \d4 	WOODPECKER, RED-COCKADED	Bird	No

 ADVANCE \d11 	South Dakota	(5 species)

Group	Critical Habitat

 ADVANCE \d3 	CRANE, WHOOPING	Bird	Yes

 ADVANCE \d4 	EAGLE, BALD	Bird	No

 ADVANCE \d4 	FERRET, BLACK-FOOTED	Mammal	No

 ADVANCE \d4 	PLOVER, PIPING	Bird	Yes

 ADVANCE \d4 	TERN, INTERIOR (POPULATION) LEAST	Bird	No

 ADVANCE \d11 	Tennessee	(7 species)

Group	Critical Habitat

 ADVANCE \d3 	BAT, GRAY	Mammal	No

 ADVANCE \d4 	BAT, INDIANA	Mammal	Yes

 ADVANCE \d4 	EAGLE, BALD	Bird	No

 ADVANCE \d4 	SQUIRREL, CAROLINA NORTHERN FLYING	Mammal	No

 ADVANCE \d13 Thursday, July 28, 2005	Page 7 of 9

 ADVANCE \d2 	TERN, INTERIOR (POPULATION) LEAST	Bird	No

 ADVANCE \d4 	WOLF, RED	Mammal	No

 ADVANCE \d4 	WOODPECKER, RED-COCKADED	Bird	No

 ADVANCE \d11 	Texas	(15 species)

Group	Critical Habitat

 ADVANCE \d3 	BEAR, LOUISIANA BLACK	Mammal	Yes

 ADVANCE \d4 	CRANE, WHOOPING	Bird	Yes

 ADVANCE \d4 	CURLEW, ESKIMO	Bird	No

 ADVANCE \d4 	EAGLE, BALD	Bird	No

 ADVANCE \d4 	FALCON, NORTHERN APLOMADO	Bird	No

 ADVANCE \d4 	JAGUARUNDI, Gulf Coast	Mammal	No

 ADVANCE \d4 	OCELOT	Mammal	No

 ADVANCE \d4 	PELICAN, BROWN	Bird	No

 ADVANCE \d4 	PLOVER, MOUNTAIN	Bird	No

 ADVANCE \d4 	PLOVER, PIPING	Bird	Yes

 ADVANCE \d4 	PRAIRIE-CHICKEN, ATTWATER'S GREATER	Bird	No

 ADVANCE \d4 	TERN, INTERIOR (POPULATION) LEAST	Bird	No

 ADVANCE \d4 	VIREO, BLACK-CAPPED	Bird	No

 ADVANCE \d4 	WARBLER (WOOD), GOLDEN-CHEEKED	Bird	No

 ADVANCE \d4 	WOODPECKER, RED-COCKADED	Bird	No

 ADVANCE \d11 	Vermont	(2 species)

Group	Critical Habitat

 ADVANCE \d3 	BAT, INDIANA	Mammal	Yes

 ADVANCE \d4 	EAGLE, BALD	Bird	No

 ADVANCE \d11 	Virginia	(7 species)

Group	Critical Habitat

 ADVANCE \d3 	BAT, INDIANA	Mammal	Yes

 ADVANCE \d4 	BAT, VIRGINIA BIG-EARED	Mammal	Yes

 ADVANCE \d4 	EAGLE, BALD	Bird	No

 ADVANCE \d4 	PLOVER, PIPING	Bird	Yes

 ADVANCE \d4 	SQUIRREL, DELMARVA PENINSULA FOX	Mammal	No

 ADVANCE \d4 	WHALE, NORTHERN RIGHT	Mammal	Yes

 ADVANCE \d13 Thursday, July 28, 2005	Page 8 of 9

 ADVANCE \d2 	WOODPECKER, RED-COCKADED	Bird	No

 ADVANCE \d11 	West virginia	(5 species)

Group	Critical Habitat

 ADVANCE \d3 	BAT, GRAY	Mammal	No

 ADVANCE \d4 	BAT, INDIANA	Mammal	Yes

 ADVANCE \d4 	BAT, VIRGINIA BIG-EARED	Mammal	Yes

 ADVANCE \d4 	EAGLE, BALD	Bird	No

 ADVANCE \d4 	SQUIRREL, VIRGINIA NORTHERN FLYING	Mammal	No

 ADVANCE \d11 	Wisconsin	(3 species)

Group	Critical Habitat

 ADVANCE \d3 	EAGLE, BALD	Bird	No

 ADVANCE \d4 	WARBLER (WOOD), KIRTLAND'S	Bird	No

 ADVANCE \d4 	WOLF, GRAY	Mammal	Yes

 ADVANCE \d380 Thursday, July 28, 2005	Page 9 of 9

( PAGE  2 (