[Federal Register Volume 76, Number 18 (Thursday, January 27, 2011)]
[Notices]
[Page 4893]
[FR Doc No: 2011-1718]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission

Notice Announcing Preliminary Permit Drawing

January 20, 2011.

Lock Hydro Friends Fund XXXV..............  Project No. 13735-000
FFP Missouri 7, LLC.......................  Project No. 13756-000
Dashields Hydro, LLC......................  Project No. 13779-000

    On May 18, 2010, at 8:30 a.m., the Commission received three
preliminary permit applications for proposed projects to be located at
the Dashields Lock & Dam located on the Ohio River in Alleghany County,
Pennsylvania.\1\ The applications were filed by Lock Hydro Friends Fund
XXXV, for Project No. 13735-000, FFP Missouri 7, LLC, for Project No.
13756-000, and Dashields Hydro, LLC, for Project No. 13779-000.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \1\ The Commission is open each day from 8:30 a.m. to 5 p.m.,
except Saturdays, Sundays, and holidays. 18 CFR 375.101(c) (2010).
The applications were filed between 5 p.m. on Monday May 17, 2010,
and 8:30 a.m. on Tuesday May 18, 2010. Under the Commission's Rules
of Practice and Procedure, any document received after regular
business hours is considered filed at 8:30 a.m. on the next regular
business day. 18 CFR 385.2001(a)(2) (2010).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    Where all permit applicants are municipalities or all permit
applicants are non-municipalities, and no applicant's plans are better
adapted than the others' to develop, conserve, and utilize in the
public interest the water resources of a region, the Commission issues
a permit to the applicant who filed first in time.\2\ In this case,
because three applications from entities not claiming municipal
preference are deemed filed at the same time, the Commission will
conduct a random tie breaker to determine priority. In the event that
the Commission concludes that no applicant's plans are better adapted
than the others, priority will be determined accordingly.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \2\ 18 CFR 4.37 (2010). See, e.g., BPUS Generation Development,
LLC, 126 FERC ] 61,132 (2009).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    On January 27, 2011, at 10 a.m. (eastern time), the Secretary of
the Commission, or her designee, will, by random drawing, determine the
filing priority for the three applicants identified in this notice. The
drawing is open to the public and will be held in room 2C, the
Commission Meeting Room, located at 888 First St., NE., Washington, DC
20426. The results of the drawing will be recorded by the Secretary or
her designee. A subsequent notice will be issued by the Secretary
announcing the results of the drawing.

Kimberly D. Bose,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2011-1718 Filed 1-26-11; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6717-01-P


44197 Federal Register / Vol. 67, No. 126 / Monday, July 1, 2002 / Notices unless it displays a currently valid OMB control number. The OMB control numbers for EPA's regulations are listed in 40 CFR part 9 and 48 CFR chapter 15. The Agency today begins an effort to examine the notification forms and consider options for reducing their burden and increasing the usefulness of the information these forms collect. The Agency would appreciate any information on the users of this information, how they use this information, how the information could be improved, and how the burden for these forms can be reduced. Therefore, the EPA would like to solicit comments to: ( i) Evaluate whether the proposed collection of information is necessary for the proper performance of the functions of the agency, including whether the information will have practical utility; ( ii) Evaluate the accuracy of the agency's estimate of the burden of the proposed collection of information, including the validity of the methodology and assumptions used; ( iii) Enhance the quality, utility, and clarity of the information to be collected; and ( iv) Minimize the burden of the collection of information on those who are to respond, including through the use of appropriate automated electronic, mechanical, or other technological collection techniques or other forms of information technology, e. g., permitting electronic submission of responses. Burden Statement: The estimated average burden for renewing the existing notification ICR is 4.25 hours per respondent for initial notifications and 1.84 hours per respondent for subsequent notifications. This estimates for the notification ICR includes all aspects of the information collection including time for reviewing instructions, searching existing data sources, gathering data, and completing and reviewing the form. EPA estimates that the number of respondents per year for notifications is 31,125 ( 16,174 initial notifications and 14,951 subsequent notifications). For this ICR, collection occurs one time per respondent, unless regulations are revised and promulgated. Timing of the submission of the notification is variable depending on the status of the respondent and the timing of the promulgation of the regulations. The estimated total annual burden on respondents for initial and subsequent notifications is 96,250 hours. These estimates of total annual burden reflect a decrease in burden of 3.9% for all notifications when compared with the previously approved ICR ( 1999). Burden means the total time, effort, or financial resources expended by persons to generate, maintain, retain, or disclose or provide information to or for a Federal agency. This includes the time needed to review instructions; develop, acquire, install, and utilize technology and systems for the purposes of collecting, validating, and verifying information, processing and maintaining information, and disclosing and providing information; adjust the existing ways to comply with any previously applicable instructions and requirements; train personnel to be able to respond to a collection of information; search data sources; complete and review the collection of information; and transmit or otherwise disclose the information.

Dated: June 7, 2002. Elizabeth A. Cotsworth, Director, Office of Solid Waste. [ FR Doc. 02   16464 Filed 6   28   02; 8: 45 am]

BILLING CODE 6560   50   P ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY [ OEI   10016; FRL   6723   9]

Toxic Chemical Release Reporting; Alternate Threshold for Low Annual Reportable Amounts; Request for Comment on Renewal Information Collection AGENCY: Environmental Protection Agency ( EPA). ACTION: Notice.

SUMMARY: In compliance with the Paperwork Reduction Act ( 44 U. S. C. 3501 et seq.), this notice announces that EPA is planning to submit the following continuing Information Collection Request ( ICR) to the Office of Management and Budget ( OMB) pursuant to the procedures described in 5 CFR 1320.12: Alternate Threshold for Low Annual Reportable Amounts, Toxic Chemical Release Reporting ( EPA ICR No. 1704.06, OMB No. 2070   0143). This ICR covers the reporting and recordkeeping requirements associated with reporting under the alternate threshold for reporting to the Toxics Release Inventory ( TRI), which appear in 40 CFR part 372. An agency may not conduct or sponsor, and a person is not required to respond to, a collection of information unless it displays a currently valid OMB control number. The OMB control numbers for EPA's regulations are listed in 40 CFR part 9 and 48 CFR Chapter 15. Before submitting the ICR to OMB for review and approval, EPA is soliciting comments on specific aspects of the proposed information collection as described below. DATES: Comments, identified by the docket control number OEI   10016, must be submitted on or before August 30, 2002.

ADDRESSES: Comments may be submitted by mail, electronically, or in person. Please follow the detailed instructions for each method as provided in Unit III. of the SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION section of this notice. FOR FURTHER INFORMATION: For general information, contact The Emergency Planning and Community Right to Know Hotline at ( 800) 424   9346 or ( 703) 412   9810, TDD ( 800) 553   7672, http:// www. epa. gov/ epaoswer/ hotline/. For technical information about this ICR renewal, contact: Judith Kendall, Toxics Release Inventory Program Division, OEI ( 2844T), Environmental Protection Agency, 1200 Pennsylvania Ave. NW., Washington, DC 20460, Telephone: 202   566   0750; Fax: 202   566   0727; email: kendall. judith@ epa. gov. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

I. Does This Notice Apply to Me?

A. Affected Entities: Entities that will be affected by this action are those facilities that manufacture, process, or otherwise use certain toxic chemicals listed on the Toxics Release Inventory ( TRI) and which are required under section 313 of the Emergency Planning and Community Right to Know Act of 1986 ( EPCRA), to report annually to EPA their environmental releases of such chemicals. Currently, those industries with the following SIC code designations ( that meet all other threshold criteria for TRI reporting) must report toxic chemical releases and other waste management activities:   20   39, manufacturing sector   10, metal mining ( except for SIC codes 1011, 1081, and 1094)   12, coal mining ( except for SIC code 1241 and extraction activities)   4911, 4931 and 4939, electrical utilities that combust coal and/ or oil for the purpose of generating power for distribution in commerce.   4953, RCRA Subtitle C hazardous waste treatment and disposal facilities   5169, chemicals and allied products wholesale distributors   5171, petroleum bulk plants and terminals   7389, solvent recovery services, and   federal facilities in any SIC code To determine whether you or your business is affected by this action, you should carefully examine the VerDate May< 23> 2002 23: 22 Jun 28, 2002 Jkt 197001 PO 00000 Frm 00031 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 E:\ FR\ FM\ 01JYN1. SGM pfrm17 PsN: 01JYN1 44198 Federal Register / Vol. 67, No. 126 / Monday, July 1, 2002 / Notices applicability provisions at 40 CFR part 372 and section 4( a) of the Supporting Statement of the information collection. If you have any questions regarding the applicability of this action to a particular entity, consult the person( s) listed in the FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT section.

II. How Can I Get Additional Information or Copies of This Document and Other Support Documents:

A. Electronic Availability Internet Electronic copies of the ICR are available from the EPA Home Page at the Federal Register   Environmental Documents entry for this document under `` Laws and Regulations'' ( http:// www. epa. gov/ fedrgstr/). An electronic copy of the collection instrument referenced in this ICR and instructions for its completion are available at http:// www. epa. gov/ triinter/# forms.

In Person The Agency has established an official record for this action under docket control number OEI   10016. The official record consists of the documents specifically referenced in this action, any public comments received during an applicable comment period, and other information related to this action, including any information claimed as Confidential Business Information ( CBI). This official record includes the documents that are physically located in the docket, as well as the documents that are referenced in those documents. The public version of the official record does not include any information claimed as CBI. The public version of the official record, which includes printed, paper versions of any electronic comments submitted during an applicable comment period, is available for inspection in the TSCA Nonconfidential Information Center, North East Mall Rm. B   607, Waterside Mall, 401 M St., SW., Washington, DC. The Center is open from noon to 4 p. m., Monday through Friday, excluding legal holidays. The telephone number of the Center is ( 202) 260   7099.

III. How Can I Respond to This Notice?

A. How and to Whom Do I Submit Comments?

You may submit comments through the mail, in person, or electronically. Be sure to identify the appropriate docket control number ( i. e., `` OEI   10016'') in your correspondence. 1. By mail. All comments should be sent in triplicate to: Document Control Office ( 7407), Office of Pollution Prevention and Toxics ( OPPT), Environmental Protection Agency, 1200 Pennsylvania Ave., NW., Ariel Rios Building, Washington, DC 20460. 2. In person or by courier. Comments may be delivered in person or by courier to: OPPT Document Control Office ( DCO) in East Tower Rm. G   099, Waterside Mall, 401 M St., SW., Washington, DC. The DCO is open from 8 a. m. to 4 p. m., Monday through Friday, excluding legal holidays. The telephone number for the DCO is ( 202) 260   7093. 3. Electronically. Submit your comments electronically by e mail to: `` oppt. ncic@ epa. gov.'' Please note that you should not submit any information electronically that you consider to be CBI. Electronic comments must be submitted as an ASCII file avoiding the use of special characters and any form of encryption. Comments and data will also be accepted on standard computer disks in WordPerfect 6.1/ 8.0 or ASCII file format. All comments and data in electronic form must be identified by the docket control number OEI   10016. Electronic comments on this document may also be filed online at many Federal Depository Libraries.

B. How Should I Handle CBI Information That I Want To Submit to the Agency? All comments which contain information claimed as CBI must be clearly marked as such. Three sanitized copies of any comments containing information claimed as CBI must also be submitted and will be placed in the public record for this document. Persons submitting information on any portion of which they believe is entitled to treatment as CBI by EPA must assert a business confidentiality claim in accordance with 40 CFR 2.203( b) for each such portion. This claim must be made at the time that the information is submitted to EPA. If a submitter does not assert a confidentiality claim at the time of submission, EPA will consider this as a waiver of any confidentiality claim and the information may be made available to the public by EPA without further notice to the submitter.

C. What Information Is EPA Particularly Interested In? Pursuant to section 3506( c)( 2)( a) of the PRA, EPA specifically solicits comments and information to enable it to:

( i) Evaluate whether the proposed collection of information is necessary for the proper performance of the functions of the Agency, including whether the information will have practical utility; ( ii) Evaluate the accuracy of the Agency's estimate of the burden of the proposed collection of information, including the validity of the methodology and assumptions used; ( iii) Enhance the quality, utility, and clarity of the information to be collected; and ( iv) Minimize the burden of the collection of information on those who are to respond, including through the use of appropriate automated electronic, mechanical, or other technological collection techniques or other forms of information technology, e. g., permitting electronic submission of responses.

In addition, EPA is requesting comment on a minor change to Certification Form A in this ICR. Facilities will be required to supply an e mail address on the Form A that will help to facilitate better lines of communication between EPA and facilities reporting to TRI.

IV. To What Information Collection Activity or ICR Does This Notice Apply? EPA is seeking comments on the following ICR, as well as the Agency's intention to renew the corresponding OMB approval, which is currently scheduled to expire on January 31, 2003. Title: Alternate Threshold for Low Annual Reportable Amounts. ICR numbers: EPA ICR No. 1704.06, OMB No. 2070   0143. Abstract: EPCRA section 313 requires certain facilities manufacturing, processing, or otherwise using certain toxic chemicals in excess of specified threshold quantities to report their environmental releases of such chemicals annually. Each such facility must file a separate report for each such chemical. In accordance with the authority in EPCRA, EPA has established an alternate threshold for those facilities with low amounts of a listed toxic chemical in wastes. A facility that otherwise meets the current reporting thresholds, but estimates that the total amount of the chemical in waste does not exceed 500 pounds per year, and that the chemical was manufactured, processed, or otherwise used in an amount not exceeding 1 million pounds during the reporting year, can take advantage of reporting under the alternate threshold option for that chemical for that reporting year. Each qualifying facility that chooses to apply the revised threshold must file the Form A Certification Statement ( EPA Form 9350   2) in lieu of a complete TRI reporting Form R ( EPA Form 9350   1). In submitting the Form A certification statement, the facility certifies that the sum of the amount of VerDate May< 23> 2002 23: 22 Jun 28, 2002 Jkt 197001 PO 00000 Frm 00032 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 E:\ FR\ FM\ 01JYN1. SGM pfrm17 PsN: 01JYN1 44199 Federal Register / Vol. 67, No. 126 / Monday, July 1, 2002 / Notices the EPCRA section 313 chemical in wastes did not exceed 500 pounds for the reporting year, and that the chemical was manufactured, processed, or otherwise used in an amount not exceeding 1 million pounds during the reporting year. Use of the Form A certification represents a substantial savings to respondents, both in burden hours and in labor costs. The Form A certification statement provides communities with information that the chemical is being manufactured, processed or otherwise used at facilities. Additionally, the Form A certification provides compliance monitoring and enforcement programs and other interested parties with a means to track chemical management activities and verify overall compliance with the rule. Responses to this collection of information are mandatory ( see 40 CFR part 372) and facilities subject to reporting must submit either a Form A certification or a Form R.

V. What Are EPA's Burden and Cost Estimates for This ICR? Under the PRA, `` burden'' means the total time, effort, or financial resources expended by persons to generate, maintain, retain, or disclose or provide information to or for a federal agency. For this collection, it includes the time needed to review instructions; develop, acquire, install, and utilize technology and systems for the purposes of collecting, validating, and verifying information, processing and maintaining information, and disclosing and providing information; adjust the existing ways to comply with any previously applicable instructions and requirements; train personnel to be able to respond to a collection of information; search data sources; complete and review the collection of information; and transmit or otherwise disclose the information. The annual public burden for this collection of information, which is approved under OMB Control No. 2070   0143, is estimated to average 13.7 hours for facilities submitting a Form A certification statement for a single listed chemical. By comparison, the average time required for calculations, form completion and record keeping/ mailing for Form R is estimated to average 19.5 hours per form. Thus, for a facility filing a Form A certification for a single chemical, the alternate threshold yields an average savings of 5.8 hours. The ICR supporting statement provides a detailed explanation of the burden estimates that are summarized in this notice. The following is a summary of the estimates taken from the ICR supporting statement: Estimated No. of Respondents: 5,451 respondents. Frequency of Responses: Annual. Estimated Total Annual Burden Hours: 145,534 burden hours. Estimated Total Annual Burden Costs: $ 6.35 million.

VI. Are There Changes in the Estimates From the Last Approval?

The estimated burden described above differs from what is currently in OMB's inventory for alternate threshold reporting: 14,793 responses ( chemicals) and 644,761 burden hours. The burden estimated in this supporting statement differs from OMB's inventory as a result of adjustments to estimates of the number of responses ( from 14,793 responses ( chemicals) to 5,121 responses ( Form As)), changes to unit reporting burden estimates ( from 30.2 to 9.2 burden hours per chemical certified on a Form A), and an adjustment for use of TRI   ME, EPA's intelligent report software ( an additional burden reduction of 3.1 hours per chemical certified on a Form A) for those forms completed using TRI   ME. These changes are described in greater detail in the supporting statement for this ICR, available in the public version of the official record.

VII. What Is the Next Step in the Process for This ICR?

EPA will consider the comments received and amend the ICR as appropriate. The final ICR package will then be submitted to OMB for review and approval pursuant to 5 CFR 1320.12. EPA will issue another Federal Register notice pursuant to 5 CFR 1320.5( a)( 1)( iv) to announce the submission of the ICR to OMB and the opportunity to submit additional comments to OMB. If you have any questions about this ICR or the approval process, please contact the person( s) listed in the FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT section.

List of Subjects in 40 CFR Part 372 Environmental protection, Information collection requests, Reporting and record keeping requirements.

Dated: June 24, 2002.

Ramona Trovato,

Acting Assistant Administrator and Chief Information Officer, Office of Environmental Information. [ FR Doc. 02   16479 Filed 6   28   02; 8: 45 am]

BILLING CODE 6560   50   U ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY [ FRL   7239   6]

National Advisory Council for Environmental Policy and Technology AGENCY: Environmental Protection Agency ( EPA).

ACTION: Notice of meeting.

SUMMARY: Under the Federal Advisory Committee Act, P. L. 92463, EPA gives notice of a meeting of the National Advisory Council for Environmental Policy and Technology ( NACEPT). NACEPT provides advice and recommendations to the Administrator of EPA on a broad range of environmental policy and management issues. NACEPT consists of a representative cross section of EPA's partners and principle constituents who provide advice and recommendations on policy issues and serve as a sounding board for new strategies that the Agency is developing. NACEPT will discuss a number of issues, including emerging trends facing the agency, environmental technology, and other program office initiatives. In addition, NACEPT will report on the work and status of subcommittees and workgroups.

DATES: NACEPT will hold a two day public meeting on Thursday, July 18, 2002, from 8: 30 a. m to 5 p. m., and Friday, July 19, 2002, from 8: 30 a. m. to 4 p. m.

ADDRESSES: The meeting will be held at the Hotel Washington at 515 15th Street NW., Washington, DC. The meeting is open to the public, with limited seating on a first come, first served basis.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Mark Joyce, Designated Federal Officer, U. S. EPA, Office of Cooperative Environmental Management, at ( 202) 564   9802. Meeting Access: Individuals requiring special accommodation at this meeting, including wheelchair access, should contact Mark Joyce at least five business days prior to the meeting so that appropriate arrangements can be made.

Dated: June 21, 2002.

Mark Joyce,

Designated Federal Officer. [ FR Doc. 02   16462 Filed 6   28   02; 8: 45 am]

BILLING CODE 6560   50   P VerDate May< 23> 2002 23: 22 Jun 28, 2002 Jkt 197001 PO 00000 Frm 00033 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 E:\ FR\ FM\ 01JYN1. SGM pfrm17 PsN: 01JYN1


[Federal Register Volume 83, Number 240 (Friday, December 14, 2018)]
[Notices]
[Page 64349]
[FR Doc No: 2018-27161]

=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY

Coast Guard

[Docket No. USCG-2018-1047]

Information Collection Request to Office of Management and
Budget; OMB Control Number: 1625-0016

AGENCY: Coast Guard, DHS.

ACTION: Sixty-day notice requesting comments.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: In compliance with the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995, the
U.S. Coast Guard intends to submit an Information Collection Request
(ICR) to the Office of Management and Budget (OMB), Office of
Information and Regulatory Affairs (OIRA), requesting an extension of
its approval for the following collection of information: 1625-0016,
Welding and Hot Work Permits; Posting of Warning Signs; without change.
Our ICR describe the information we seek to collect from the public.
Before submitting this ICR to OIRA, the Coast Guard is inviting
comments as described below.

DATES: Comments must reach the Coast Guard on or before February 12,
2019.

ADDRESSES: You may submit comments identified by Coast Guard docket
number [USCG-2018-1047] to the Coast Guard using the Federal
eRulemaking Portal at https://www.regulations.gov. See the ``Public
participation and request for comments'' portion of the SUPPLEMENTARY
INFORMATION section for further instructions on submitting comments.
    A copy of the ICR is available through the docket on the internet
at https://www.regulations.gov. Additionally, copies are available
from: Commandant (CG-612), ATTN: Paperwork Reduction Act Manager, U.S.
Coast Guard, 2703 Martin Luther King Jr. Ave. SE, STOP 7710,
Washington, DC 20593-7710.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Mr. Anthony Smith, Office of
Information Management, telephone<PHONE_NUMBER>, or fax<PHONE_NUMBER>,
for questions on these documents.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

Public Participation and Request for Comments

    This notice relies on the authority of the Paperwork Reduction Act
of 1995; 44 U.S.C. chapter 35, as amended. An ICR is an application to
OIRA seeking the approval, extension, or renewal of a Coast Guard
collection of information (Collection). The ICR contains information
describing the Collection's purpose, the Collection's likely burden on
the affected public, an explanation of the necessity of the Collection,
and other important information describing the Collection. There is one
ICR for each Collection.
    The Coast Guard invites comments on whether this ICR should be
granted based on the Collection being necessary for the proper
performance of Departmental functions. In particular, the Coast Guard
would appreciate comments addressing: (1) The practical utility of the
Collection; (2) the accuracy of the estimated burden of the Collection;
(3) ways to enhance the quality, utility, and clarity of information
subject to the Collection; and (4) ways to minimize the burden of the
Collection on respondents, including the use of automated collection
techniques or other forms of information technology. In response to
your comments, we may revise this ICR or decide not to seek an
extension of approval for the Collection. We will consider all comments
and material received during the comment period.
    We encourage you to respond to this request by submitting comments
and related materials. Comments must contain the OMB Control Number of
the ICR and the docket number of this request, [USCG-2018-1047], and
must be received by February 12, 2019.

Submitting Comments

    We encourage you to submit comments through the Federal eRulemaking
Portal at https://www.regulations.gov. If your material cannot be
submitted using https://www.regulations.gov, contact the person in the
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT section of this document for alternate
instructions. Documents mentioned in this notice, and all public
comments, are in our online docket at https://www.regulations.gov and
can be viewed by following that website's instructions. Additionally,
if you go to the online docket and sign up for email alerts, you will
be notified when comments are posted.
    We accept anonymous comments. All comments received will be posted
without change to https://www.regulations.gov and will include any
personal information you have provided. For more about privacy and the
docket, you may review a Privacy Act notice regarding the Federal
Docket Management System in the March 24, 2005, issue of the Federal
Register (70 FR 15086).

Information Collection Request

    Title: Welding and Hot Work Permits; Posting of Warning Signs.
    OMB Control Number: 1625-0016.
    Summary: This information collection helps to ensure that
waterfront facilities and vessels are in compliance with safety
standards. A permit must be issued prior to welding or hot work at
certain waterfront facilities; and, the posting of warning signs is
required on certain facilities.
    Need: The information is needed to ensure safe operations on
certain waterfront facilities and vessels.
    Forms: CG-4201, Welding and Hot Work.
    Respondents: Owners and operators of certain waterfront facilities
and vessels.
    Frequency: On occasion.
    Hour Burden Estimate: The estimated burden has decreased from 593
hours to 434 hours a year due to a decrease in the estimated annual
number of responses.

    Authority: The Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995; 44 U.S.C.
Chapter 35, as amended.

    Dated: December 11, 2018.
James D. Roppel,
U.S. Coast Guard, Acting Chief, Office of Information Management.
[FR Doc. 2018-27161 Filed 12-13-18; 8:45 am]
 BILLING CODE 9110-04-P


[Federal Register Volume 79, Number 78 (Wednesday, April 23, 2014)]
[Notices]
[Page 22752]
[FR Doc No: 2014-09314]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

[File No. 500-1]

Valley Forge Composite Technologies, Inc.; Order of Suspension of
Trading

April 21, 2014.
    It appears to the Securities and Exchange Commission that there is
a lack of current and accurate information concerning the securities of
Valley Forge Composite Technologies, Inc. because it has not filed any
periodic reports since the period ended September 30, 2012.
    The Commission is of the opinion that the public interest and the
protection of investors require a suspension of trading in the
securities of the above-listed company. Therefore, it is ordered,
pursuant to Section 12(k) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, that
trading in the securities of the above-listed company is suspended for
the period from 9:30 a.m. EDT on April 21, 2014, through 11:59 p.m. EDT
on May 2, 2014.

    By the Commission.
Kevin M. O'Neill,
Deputy Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2014-09314 Filed 4-21-14; 4:15 pm]
BILLING CODE 8011-01-P


[Federal Register Volume 80, Number 105 (Tuesday, June 2, 2015)]
[Notices]
[Pages 31419-31420]
[FR Doc No: 2015-13171]

=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

[Release No. 34-75048; File No. SR-NYSE-2015-15]

Self-Regulatory Organizations; New York Stock Exchange LLC;
Notice of Designation of a Longer Period for Commission Action on a
Proposed Rule Change Amending NYSE Rule 13 and Related Rules Governing
Order Types and Modifiers

May 27, 2015.
    On March 24, 2015, New York Stock Exchange LLC (``Exchange'') filed
with the Securities and Exchange Commission (``Commission''), pursuant
to section 19(b)(1) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (``Act'')
\1\ and Rule 19b-4 thereunder,\2\ a proposed rule change to amend NYSE
Rule 13, and related NYSE rules, governing order types and modifiers.
The proposed rule change was published for comment in the Federal
Register on April 14, 2015.\3\ The Commission has received no

comment letters regarding the proposed rule change.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \1\ 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(1).
    \2\ 17 CFR 240.19b-4.
    \3\ See Securities Exchange Act Release No. 74678 (April 8,
2015), 80 FR 20053 (``Notice'').
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    Section 19(b)(2) of the Act \3\ provides that, within 45 days of
the publication of the notice of the filing of a proposed rule change,
or within such longer period up to 90 days as the Commission may
designate if it finds such longer period to be appropriate and
publishes its reasons for so finding, or as to which the self-
regulatory organization consents, the Commission shall either approve
the proposed rule change, disapprove the proposed rule change, or
institute proceedings to determine whether the proposed rule change
should be disapproved. The Commission is extending this 45-day time
period.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \3\ 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(2).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    The Commission finds that it is appropriate to designate a longer
period within which to take action on the proposed rule change so that
it has sufficient time to consider the proposed rule change.
Accordingly, the Commission, pursuant to section 19(b)(2) of the
Act,\4\ designates July 13, 2015 as the date by which the Commission
should either approve or disapprove or institute proceedings to
determine whether to disapprove the proposed rule change (File Number
SR-NYSE-2015-15).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \4\ Id.

    For the Commission, by the Division of Trading and Markets,
pursuant to delegated authority.\5\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \5\ 17 CFR 200.30-3(a)(31).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

Robert W. Errett,
Deputy Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2015-13171 Filed 6-1-15; 8:45 am]
 BILLING CODE 8011-01-P


[Federal Register Volume 77, Number 30 (Tuesday, February 14, 2012)]
[Proposed Rules]
[Pages 8181-8183]
[FR Doc No: 2012-3387]

=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION

Federal Aviation Administration

14 CFR Part 39

[Docket No. FAA-2012-0141; Directorate Identifier 2011-NM-092-AD]
RIN 2120-AA64

Airworthiness Directives; Fokker Services B.V. Airplanes

AGENCY: Federal Aviation Administration (FAA), DOT.

ACTION: Notice of proposed rulemaking (NPRM).

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: We propose to adopt a new airworthiness directive (AD) for all
Fokker Services B.V. Model F.28 Mark 0070 and 0100 airplanes. This
proposed AD was prompted by an in-flight failure of the hydraulic
control panel, which resulted in the absence of pressure and quantity
indication of the hydraulic system and accompanying alerts for
``hydraulic system 1 low quantity'' and ``hydraulic system 2 low
quantity.'' This proposed AD would require implementing new abnormal
procedures for hydraulics in the airplane flight manual (AFM). We are
proposing this AD to prevent loss of control of the airplane due to
incorrect hydraulic system failure information being provided to the
flightcrew, followed by application of inappropriate procedures.

DATES: We must receive comments on this proposed AD by March 30, 2012.

ADDRESSES: You may send comments by any of the following methods:
     Federal eRulemaking Portal: Go to http://www.regulations.gov. Follow the instructions for submitting comments.
     Fax:<PHONE_NUMBER>.
     Mail: U.S. Department of Transportation, Docket
Operations, M-30, West Building Ground Floor, Room W12-140, 1200 New
Jersey Avenue SE., Washington, DC 20590.
     Hand Delivery: U.S. Department of Transportation, Docket
Operations, M-30, West Building Ground Floor, Room W12-140, 1200 New
Jersey Avenue SE., Washington, DC, between 9 a.m. and 5 p.m., Monday
through Friday, except Federal holidays.
    For service information identified in this proposed AD, contact
Fokker Services B.V., Technical Services Dept., P.O. Box 231, 2150 AE
Nieuw-Vennep, the Netherlands; telephone +31 (0)252-627-350; fax +31
(0)252-627-211; email<EMAIL_ADDRESS>
Internet http://www.myfokkerfleet.com. You may review copies of the
referenced service information at the FAA, Transport Airplane
Directorate, 1601 Lind Avenue SW., Renton, Washington. For information
on the availability of this material at the FAA, call<PHONE_NUMBER>.

Examining the AD Docket

    You may examine the AD docket on the Internet at http://www.regulations.gov; or in person at the Docket Operations office
between 9 a.m. and 5 p.m., Monday through Friday, except Federal
holidays. The AD docket contains this proposed AD, the regulatory
evaluation, any comments received, and other information. The street
address for the Docket Operations office (telephone<PHONE_NUMBER>) is
in the ADDRESSES section. Comments will be available in the AD docket
shortly after receipt.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Tom Rodriguez, Aerospace Engineer,
International Branch, ANM-116, Transport Airplane Directorate, FAA,
1601 Lind Avenue SW., Renton, Washington 98057-3356; telephone (425)
227-1137; fax<PHONE_NUMBER>.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

Comments Invited

    We invite you to send any written relevant data, views, or
arguments about this proposed AD. Send your comments to an address
listed under the ADDRESSES section. Include ``Docket No. FAA-2012-0141;
Directorate Identifier 2011-NM-092-AD'' at the beginning of your
comments. We specifically invite comments on the overall regulatory,
economic, environmental, and energy aspects of this proposed AD. We
will consider all comments received by the closing date and may amend
this proposed AD based on those comments.
    We will post all comments we receive, without change, to http://www.regulations.gov, including any personal information you provide. We
will also post a report summarizing each substantive verbal contact we
receive about this proposed AD.

Discussion

    The European Aviation Safety Agency (EASA), which is the Technical
Agent for the Member States of the European Community, has issued EASA
Airworthiness Directive 2011-0051, dated March 22, 2011 (referred to
after this as ``the MCAI''), to correct an unsafe condition for the
specified products. The MCAI states:

    An in-flight failure of the hydraulic control panel resulted in
the absence of pressure and quantity indication of the hydraulic
system and accompanying alerts for ``hydraulic system 1 low
quantity'' and ``hydraulic system 2 low quantity''. The procedures
prescribed the shut-off of the engine driven hydraulic pumps,
resulting in complete absence of hydraulic pressure, which made it
impossible to hydraulically control the flight controls, including
the stabiliser. The status information contained in the procedures
for these alerts may give the false impression that the stabiliser
is still hydraulically controllable on one channel. The flight crew
regained control by using the alternate electrically powered
stabiliser control.
    A safety review revealed that a ``hydraulic system 1 and 2 low
quantity'' alert could give the right information, however this
alert is not available in the Flight Warning System. To solve this
problem, Fokker Services improved the Hydraulic 1(2) Low Quantity
Procedures in the Airplane Flight Manual (AFM).
    For the reasons described above, this [EASA] AD requires the
implementation of new abnormal procedures for hydraulics in the AFM.

The unsafe condition is possible loss of control of the airplane due to
incorrect hydraulic system failure information being provided to the
flightcrew, followed by application of inappropriate procedures. You
may obtain further information by examining the MCAI in the AD docket.

Relevant Service Information

    Fokker Services B.V. has issued Manual Change Notification--
Operational Documentation MCNO F100-057, dated December 17, 2010. The
actions described in this service information are intended to correct
the unsafe condition identified in the MCAI.

FAA's Determination and Requirements of This Proposed AD

    This product has been approved by the aviation authority of another
country, and is approved for operation in the United States. Pursuant
to our bilateral agreement with the State of Design Authority, we have
been notified of the unsafe condition described in the MCAI and service
information referenced above. We are proposing this AD because we
evaluated all pertinent information and determined an unsafe condition
exists and is likely to exist or develop on other products of the same
type design.

Costs of Compliance

    Based on the service information, we estimate that this proposed AD
would affect about 4 products of U.S. registry. We also estimate that
it would take about 1 work-hour per product to comply with the basic
requirements of this proposed AD. The average labor rate is $85 per
work-hour. Based on these figures, we estimate the cost of the proposed
AD on U.S. operators to be $340, or $85 per product.

Authority for This Rulemaking

    Title 49 of the United States Code specifies the FAA's authority to
issue rules on aviation safety. Subtitle I, section 106, describes the
authority of the FAA Administrator. ``Subtitle VII: Aviation
Programs,'' describes in more detail the scope of the Agency's
authority.
    We are issuing this rulemaking under the authority described in
``Subtitle VII, Part A, Subpart III, Section 44701: General
requirements.'' Under that section, Congress charges the FAA with
promoting safe flight of civil aircraft in air commerce by prescribing
regulations for practices, methods, and procedures the Administrator
finds necessary for safety in air commerce. This regulation is within
the scope of that authority because it addresses an unsafe condition
that is likely to exist or develop on products identified in this
rulemaking action.

Regulatory Findings

    We determined that this proposed AD would not have federalism
implications under Executive Order 13132. This proposed AD would not
have a substantial direct effect on the States, on the relationship
between the national Government and the States, or on the distribution
of power and responsibilities among the various levels of government.
    For the reasons discussed above, I certify this proposed
regulation:
    1. Is not a ``significant regulatory action'' under Executive Order
12866;
    2. Is not a ``significant rule'' under the DOT Regulatory Policies
and Procedures (44 FR 11034, February 26, 1979); and
    3. Will not affect intrastate aviation in Alaska; and
    4. Will not have a significant economic impact, positive or
negative, on a substantial number of small entities under the criteria
of the Regulatory Flexibility Act.
    We prepared a regulatory evaluation of the estimated costs to
comply with this proposed AD and placed it in the AD docket.

List of Subjects in 14 CFR Part 39

    Air transportation, Aircraft, Aviation safety, Incorporation by
reference, Safety.

The Proposed Amendment

    Accordingly, under the authority delegated to me by the
Administrator, the FAA proposes to amend 14 CFR part 39 as follows:

PART 39--AIRWORTHINESS DIRECTIVES

    1. The authority citation for part 39 continues to read as follows:

    Authority: 49 U.S.C. 106(g), 40113, 44701.

Sec.  39.13  [Amended]

    2. The FAA amends Sec.  39.13 by adding the following new AD:

Fokker Services B.V.: Docket No. FAA-2012-0141; Directorate
Identifier 2011-NM-092-AD.

(a) Comments Due Date

    We must receive comments by March 30, 2012.

(b) Affected ADs

    None.

(c) Applicability

    This AD applies to Fokker Services B.V. Model F.28 Mark 0070 and
0100 airplanes, certificated in any category, all serial numbers.

(d) Subject

    Air Transport Association (ATA) of America Code 29: Hydraulic
power.

(e) Reason

    This AD was prompted by an in-flight failure of the hydraulic
control panel, which resulted in the absence of pressure and
quantity indication of the hydraulic system and accompanying alerts
for ``hydraulic system 1 low quantity'' and ``hydraulic system 2 low
quantity.'' This proposed AD would require implementing new abnormal
procedures for hydraulics in the airplane flight manual (AFM). We
are issuing this AD to prevent loss of control of the airplane due
to incorrect hydraulic system failure information being provided to
the flightcrew, followed by application of inappropriate procedures.

(f) Compliance

    You are responsible for having the actions required by this AD
performed within the compliance times specified, unless the actions
have already been done.

(g) Airplane Flight Manual (AFM) Revision

    Within 3 months after the effective date of this AD, revise the
Abnormal Procedures--Hydraulics section of the Fokker F.28 AFM by
incorporating the information specified in Fokker Manual Change
Notification--Operational Documentation (MCNO) MCNO-

F100-057, dated December 17, 2010, into the Abnormal Procedures--
Hydraulics section of the AFM.

    Note 1 to paragraph (g): The actions required by paragraph (g)
of this AD may be done by inserting a copy of MCNO Fokker MCNO-F100-
057, dated December 17, 2010, into the Abnormal Procedures--
Hydraulics section of the Fokker F.28 AFM. When MCNO Fokker MCNO-
F100-057, dated December 17, 2010, has been included in the general
revisions of the AFM, the general revisions may be inserted in the
AFM, provided the relevant information in the general revision is
identical to that in MCNO Fokker MCNO-F100-057, dated December 17,
2010, and that MCNO may be removed.

(h) Other FAA AD Provisions

    The following provisions also apply to this AD:
    (1) Alternative Methods of Compliance (AMOCs): The Manager,
International Branch, ANM-116, Transport Airplane Directorate, FAA,
has the authority to approve AMOCs for this AD, if requested using
the procedures found in 14 CFR 39.19. In accordance with 14 CFR
39.19, send your request to your principal inspector or local Flight
Standards District Office, as appropriate. If sending information
directly to the International Branch, send it to ATTN: Tom
Rodriguez, Aerospace Engineer, International Branch, ANM-116,
Transport Airplane Directorate, FAA, 1601 Lind Avenue SW., Renton,
Washington 98057-3356; telephone<PHONE_NUMBER>; fax<PHONE_NUMBER>.
Information may be emailed to<EMAIL_ADDRESS>
Before using any approved AMOC, notify your appropriate principal
inspector, or lacking a principal inspector, the manager of the
local flight standards district office/certificate holding district
office. The AMOC approval letter must specifically reference this
AD.
    (2) Airworthy Product: For any requirement in this AD to obtain
corrective actions from a manufacturer or other source, use these
actions if they are FAA-approved. Corrective actions are considered
FAA-approved if they are approved by the State of Design Authority
(or their delegated agent). You are required to assure the product
is airworthy before it is returned to service.

(i) Related Information

    Refer to MCAI European Aviation Safety Agency (EASA)
Airworthiness Directive 2011-0051, dated March 22, 2011; and MCNO
Fokker MCNO-F100-057, dated December 17, 2010; for related
information.

    Issued in Renton, Washington on February 7, 2012.
Ali Bahrami,
Manager, Transport Airplane Directorate, Aircraft Certification
Service.
[FR Doc. 2012-3387 Filed 2-13-12; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910-13-P