[Federal Register Volume 88, Number 246 (Tuesday, December 26, 2023)]
[Notices]
[Pages 88935-88937]
[FR Doc No: 2023-28368]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY

Federal Emergency Management Agency

[Docket ID FEMA-2023-0002]

Final Flood Hazard Determinations

AGENCY: Federal Emergency Management Agency, Department of Homeland
Security.

ACTION: Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: Flood hazard determinations, which may include additions or
modifications of Base Flood Elevations (BFEs), base flood depths,
Special Flood Hazard Area (SFHA) boundaries or zone designations, or
regulatory floodways on the Flood Insurance Rate Maps (FIRMs) and where
applicable, in the supporting Flood Insurance Study (FIS) reports have
been made final for the communities listed in the table below. The FIRM
and FIS report are the basis of the floodplain management measures that
a community is required either to adopt or to show evidence of having
in effect in order to qualify or remain qualified for participation in
the Federal Emergency Management Agency's (FEMA's) National Flood
Insurance Program (NFIP).

DATES: The date of April 25, 2024 has been established for the FIRM
and, where applicable, the supporting FIS report showing the new or
modified flood hazard information for each community.

ADDRESSES: The FIRM, and if applicable, the FIS report containing the
final flood hazard information for each community is available for
inspection at the respective Community Map Repository address listed in
the tables below and will be available online through the FEMA Map
Service Center at https://msc.fema.gov by the date indicated above.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Rick Sacbibit, Chief, Engineering
Services Branch, Federal Insurance and Mitigation Administration, FEMA,
400 C Street SW, Washington, DC 20472,<PHONE_NUMBER>, or (email)
[email protected]; or visit

the FEMA Mapping and Insurance eXchange (FMIX) online at https://www.floodmaps.fema.gov/fhm/fmx_main.html.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The Federal Emergency Management Agency
(FEMA) makes the final determinations listed below for the new or
modified flood hazard information for each community listed.
Notification of these changes has been published in newspapers of local
circulation and 90 days have elapsed since that publication. The Deputy
Associate Administrator for Insurance and Mitigation has resolved any
appeals resulting from this notification.
    This final notice is issued in accordance with section 110 of the
Flood Disaster Protection Act of 1973, 42 U.S.C. 4104, and 44 CFR part
67. FEMA has developed criteria for floodplain management in floodprone
areas in accordance with 44 CFR part 60.
    Interested lessees and owners of real property are encouraged to
review the new or revised FIRM and FIS report available at the address
cited below for each community or online through the FEMA Map Service
Center at https://msc.fema.gov.
    The flood hazard determinations are made final in the watersheds
and/or communities listed in the table below.

(Catalog of Federal Domestic Assistance No. 97.022, ``Flood
Insurance.'')

Nicholas A. Shufro,
Deputy Assistant Administrator for Risk Management, Federal Emergency
Management Agency, Department of Homeland Security.

------------------------------------------------------------------------
                                             Community map repository
               Community                             address
------------------------------------------------------------------------
             Lonoke County, Arkansas and Incorporated Areas
                         Docket No.: FEMA-B-2285
------------------------------------------------------------------------
City of Cabot..........................  City Hall, 101 North 2nd
                                          Street, Cabot, AR 72023.
Unincorporated Areas of Lonoke County..  Lonoke County Floodplain
                                          Administrator Office, 210
                                          North Center Street, Lonoke,
                                          AR 72086.
------------------------------------------------------------------------
            La Plata County, Colorado and Incorporated Areas
                         Docket No.: FEMA-B-2206
------------------------------------------------------------------------
City of Durango........................  City Hall, 949 East 2nd Avenue,
                                          Durango, CO 81301.
Town of Bayfield.......................  Town Hall, 1199 Bayfield
                                          Parkway, Bayfield, CO 81122.
Town of Ignacio........................  Town Hall, 540 Goddard Avenue,
                                          Ignacio, CO 81137.
Unincorporated Areas of La Plata County  La Plata County Commissioner's
                                          Office, 1101 East 2nd Avenue,
                                          Durango, CO 81301.
------------------------------------------------------------------------
              Morgan County, Indiana and Incorporated Areas
                         Docket No.: FEMA-B-2283
------------------------------------------------------------------------
City of Martinsville...................  City Hall, 59 S Jefferson
                                          Street, Martinsville, IN
                                          46151.
Unincorporated Areas of Morgan County..  Morgan County Administration
                                          Building, 180 S Main Street,
                                          Martinsville, IN 46151.
------------------------------------------------------------------------
              Berrien County, Michigan (All Jurisdictions)
                 Docket No.: FEMA-B-2065 and FEMA-B-2288
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Charter Township of Benton.............  Benton Township Office, 1725
                                          Territorial Road, Benton
                                          Harbor, MI 49022.
Charter Township of Lake...............  Lake Township Hall, 3220
                                          Shawnee Road, Bridgman, MI
                                          49106.
Charter Township of Lincoln............  Lincoln Township Hall, 2055 W
                                          John Beers Road, Stevensville,
                                          MI 49127.
Charter Township of St. Joseph.........  Township Hall, 3000 Washington
                                          Avenue, St. Joseph, MI 49085.
City of Benton Harbor..................  City Hall, 200 E Wall Street,
                                          Benton Harbor, MI 49022.
City of Bridgman.......................  City Hall, 9765 Maple Street,
                                          Bridgman, MI 49106.
City of New Buffalo....................  City Hall, 224 W Buffalo
                                          Street, New Buffalo, MI 49117.
City of St. Joseph.....................  City Hall, 700 Broad Street,
                                          St. Joseph, MI 49085.
Township of Chikaming..................  Chickaming Township Center,
                                          13535 Red Arrow Highway,
                                          Harbert, MI 49115.
Township of Hagar......................  Hagar Township Hall, 3900
                                          Riverside Road, Riverside, MI
                                          49084.
Township of New Buffalo................  Township Office, 17425 Red
                                          Arrow Highway, New Buffalo, MI
                                          49117.
Township of Royalton...................  Royalton Township Hall, 980
                                          Miners Road, St. Joseph, MI
                                          49085.
Village of Grand Beach.................  Village Hall, 48200 Perkins
                                          Boulevard, Grand Beach, MI
                                          49117.
Village of Michiana....................  Village Hall, 4000 Cherokee
                                          Drive, Michiana, MI 49117.
Village of Shoreham....................  Shoreham Village Hall, 2120
                                          Brown School Road, St. Joseph,
                                          MI 49085.
Village of Stevensville................  Village Hall, 5768 St. Joseph
                                          Avenue, Stevensville, MI
                                          49127.
------------------------------------------------------------------------
           Pipestone County, Minnesota and Incorporated Areas
                         Docket No.: FEMA-B-2308
------------------------------------------------------------------------
City of Edgerton.......................  City Hall, 801 1st Avenue W,
                                          Edgerton, MN 56128.
City of Hatfield.......................  City Hall, 320 C Avenue,
                                          Hatfield, MN 56164.
City of Holland........................  City Hall, 210 Rock Street,
                                          Holland, MN 56139.
City of Ihlen..........................  City Hall, 110 Holman Street W,
                                          Ihlen, MN 56164.
City of Jasper.........................  City Hall, 105 E Wall Street,
                                          Jasper, MN 56144.
City of Pipestone......................  City Hall, 119 2nd Avenue SW,
                                          Suite 9, Pipestone, MN 56164.
City of Trosky.........................  City Hall, 220 Broadway Street
                                          S, Trosky, MN 56144.

Unincorporated Areas of Pipestone        Pipestone County Courthouse,
 County.                                  416 Hiawatha Avenue S,
                                          Pipestone, MN 56164.
------------------------------------------------------------------------
             Mineral County, Montana and Incorporated Areas
                         Docket No.: FEMA-B-2211
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Town of Alberton.......................  Mineral County Courthouse, 300
                                          River Street, Superior, MT
                                          59872.
Town of Superior.......................  Mineral County Courthouse, 300
                                          River Street, Superior, MT
                                          59872.
Unincorporated Areas of Mineral County.  Mineral County Courthouse, 300
                                          River Street, Superior, MT
                                          59872.
------------------------------------------------------------------------
              Fairfield County, Ohio and Incorporated Areas
                         Docket No.: FEMA-B-2318
------------------------------------------------------------------------
City of Pickerington...................  City Hall, 100 Lockville Road,
                                          Pickerington, OH 43147.
Unincorporated Areas of Fairfield        Fairfield County GIS
 County.                                  Department, 108 N High Street,
                                          Lancaster, OH 43130.
------------------------------------------------------------------------
           Roberts County, South Dakota and Incorporated Areas
                         Docket No.: FEMA-B-2273
------------------------------------------------------------------------
City of Peever.........................  Roberts County Courthouse, 411
                                          2nd Avenue E, Sisseton, SD
                                          57262.
City of Rosholt........................  Roberts County Courthouse, 411
                                          2nd Avenue E, Sisseton, SD
                                          57262.
City of Sisseton.......................  City Hall, 406 2nd Avenue W,
                                          Sisseton, SD 57262.
City of Wilmot.........................  Roberts County Courthouse, 411
                                          2nd Avenue E, Sisseton, SD
                                          57262.
Sisseton Wahpeton Oyate Tribe..........  Sisseton Wahpeton Oyate
                                          Emergency Management Office,
                                          114 Lake Traverse Drive,
                                          Sisseton, SD 57262.
Town of Claire City....................  Roberts County Courthouse, 411
                                          2nd Avenue E, Sisseton, SD
                                          57262.
Town of Corona.........................  Roberts County Courthouse, 411
                                          2nd Avenue E, Sisseton, SD
                                          57262.
Town of New Effington..................  Community Center, 303 Main
                                          Street, New Effington, SD
                                          57255.
Town of Ortley.........................  Community Center, 212 New Main
                                          Street, Ortley, SD 57256.
Town of Summit.........................  Roberts County Courthouse, 411
                                          2nd Avenue E, Sisseton, SD
                                          57262.
Town of White Rock.....................  Roberts County Courthouse, 411
                                          2nd Avenue E, Sisseton, SD
                                          57262.
Unincorporated Areas of Roberts County.  Roberts County Courthouse, 411
                                          2nd Avenue E, Sisseton, SD
                                          57262.
------------------------------------------------------------------------
            Jackson County, Tennessee and Incorporated Areas
                         Docket No.: FEMA-B-2290
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Town of Gainesboro.....................  City Hall, 402 East Hull
                                          Avenue, Gainesboro, TN 38562.
Unincorporated Areas of Jackson County.  Jackson County Courthouse, 101
                                          East Hull Avenue, Gainesboro,
                                          TN 38562.
------------------------------------------------------------------------
             Wilson County, Tennessee and Incorporated Areas
                         Docket No.: FEMA-B-2290
------------------------------------------------------------------------
City of Lebanon........................  City Hall, 200 North Castle
                                          Heights Avenue, Suite 300,
                                          Lebanon, TN 37087.
Unincorporated Areas of Wilson County..  Wilson County Courthouse, 228
                                          East Main Street, Planning
                                          Office, Room 5, Lebanon, TN
                                          37087.
------------------------------------------------------------------------
            Fauquier County, Virginia and Incorporated Areas
                   Docket No.: FEMA-B-2110 and B-2312
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Town of Remington......................  Town Office, 105 E Main Street,
                                          Remington, VA 22734.
Town of The Plains.....................  Post Office, 4314 Fauquier
                                          Avenue, The Plains, VA 20198.
Town of Warrenton......................  Town Office, 21 Main Street,
                                          Warrenton, VA 20186.
Unincorporated Areas of Fauquier County  Fauquier County GIS Department,
                                          29 Ashby Street, Warrenton, VA
                                          20186.
------------------------------------------------------------------------
              Henrico County, Virginia (All Jurisdictions)
                         Docket No.: FEMA-B-2235
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Unincorporated Areas of Henrico County.  Henrico County Administration
                                          Annex, Department of Public
                                          Works, 4305 E Parham Road,
                                          Henrico, VA 23228.
------------------------------------------------------------------------

[FR Doc. 2023-28368 Filed 12-22-23; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 9110-12-P


[Federal Register: October 30, 2006 (Volume 71, Number 209)]
[Notices]
[Page 63291]
[DOCID:fr30oc06-50]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission

[Docket No. ER06-1546-001]

Florida Power Corporation; Notice of Compliance Filing

October 20, 2006.
    Take notice that on October 19, 2006, Florida Power Corporation
(FPC) tendered for filing corrections to a tariff sheet submitted in
its original filing on September 29, 2006. FPC requests that a
shortened notice period be granted.
    Any person desiring to intervene or to protest this filing must
file in accordance with Rules 211 and 214 of the Commission's Rules of
Practice and Procedure (18 CFR 385.211, 385.214). Protests will be
considered by the Commission in determining the appropriate action to
be taken, but will not serve to make protestants parties to the
proceeding. Any person wishing to become a party must file a notice of
intervention or motion to intervene, as appropriate. Such notices,
motions, or protests must be filed on or before the comment date.
Anyone filing a motion to intervene or protest must serve a copy of
that document on the Applicant and all the parties in this proceeding.
    The Commission encourages electronic submission of protests and
interventions in lieu of paper using the ``eFiling'' link at http://www.ferc.gov.
 Persons unable to file electronically should submit an

original and 14 copies of the protest or intervention to the Federal
Energy Regulatory Commission, 888 First Street, NE., Washington, DC
20426.
    This filing is accessible on-line at http://www.ferc.gov, using the

``eLibrary'' link and is available for review in the Commission's
Public Reference Room in Washington, DC. There is an ``eSubscription''
link on the Web site that enables subscribers to receive e-mail
notification when a document is added to a subscribed docket(s). For
assistance with any FERC Online service, please e-mail
<EMAIL_ADDRESS>or call<PHONE_NUMBER> (toll free). For

TTY, call<PHONE_NUMBER>.
    Comment Date: 5 p.m. Eastern Time on October 26, 2006.

Magalie R. Salas,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. E6-18116 Filed 10-27-06; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 6717-01-P


region facility species. orig stage year impinged. est entrained. est dummy dummy dummy dummy 1980  99 dummy inland duanearnold channel. catfish age01 1980 504 . inland duanearnold johnny. darter age01 1980 17 . inland duanearnold largemouth. bass age01 1980 17 . inland duanearnold hornyhead. chub age01 1980 17 . inland duanearnold redbelly. dace age01 1980 52 . inland duanearnold flathead. catfish age01 1980 35 . inland duanearnold shiner age01 1980 17 . inland duanearnold bluntnose. minnow age01 1980 17 . inland duanearnold notropis age01 1980 70 . inland duanearnold quillback. carpsucker age01 1980 35 . inland duanearnold pimephales. spp age01 1980 17 . notes qc mean of means; multiple rm documents agage mean of means; multiple rm documents agage mean of means; multiple rm documents agage mean of means; multiple rm documents agage mean of means; multiple rm documents agage mean of means; multiple rm documents agage mean of means; multiple rm documents agage mean of means; multiple rm documents agage mean of means; multiple rm documents agage mean of means; multiple rm documents agage mean of means; multiple rm documents agage mean of means; multiple rm documents agage year impinged. est source qc Quarterly monitoring 1976 490 RM# 36470 pg 21 agage date species imp source 1977 628 RM# 36471 pg 25 agage 3/ 29/ 1976 channel. catfish 2 RM# 36470 tab 1978 . . agage 3/ 29/ 1976 johnny. darter 1 RM# 36470 tab 1979 455 RM# 36492 pg 6.11 agage 3/ 29/ 1976 largemouth. bass 1 RM# 36470 tab 1980 230 RM# 36491 pg 6.11 agage 3/ 29/ 1976 hornyhead. chub 1 RM# 36470 tab 1981 306 RM# 36472 pg 17 agage 3/ 29/ 1976 redbelly. dace 3 RM# 36470 tab 1982 208 RM# 36473 pg 18 agage 5/ 14/ 1976 channel. catfish 1 RM# 36470 tab 1983 . . agage 8/ 16/ 1976 flathead. catfish 1 RM# 36470 tab 1984 746 RM# 36475 pg 15 agage 10/ 16/ 1976 flathead. catfish 1 RM# 36470 tab 1985 795 RM# 36476 pg 16 agage 10/ 16/ 1976 channel. catfish 10 RM# 36470 tab 1986 501 RM# 36477 pg 48 agage 10/ 16/ 1976 shiner 1 RM# 36470 tab 1987 261 RM# 36478 pg 48 agage 10/ 16/ 1976 bluntnose. minnow 1 RM# 36470 tab 1988 539 RM# 36479 pg 53 agage 2/ 15/ 1977 notropis 3 RM# 36471 tab 1989 4933 RM# 36480 pg 58 agage 2/ 15/ 1977 channel. catfish 8 RM# 36471 tab 1990 1981 RM# 36481 pg 49 agage 2/ 15/ 1977 quillback. carpsucker 2 RM# 36471 tab 1991 1415 RM# 36482 pg 49 agage 6/ 7/ 1977 . 0 RM# 36471 tab 1992 532 RM# 36483 pg 45 agage 8/ 18/ 1977 notropis 1 RM# 36471 tab 1993 384 RM# 36484 pg 42 agage 11/ 14/ 1977 channel. catfish 8 RM# 36471 tab 1994 618 RM# 36485 pg 45 agage 11/ 14/ 1977 pimiephales. spp 1 RM# 36471 tab 1995 347 RM# 36486 pg 48 agage 1996 897 RM# 36487 pg 48 agage 1997 533 RM# 36488 pg 46 agage 3/ 29/ 1976 channel. catfish 29 RM# 36470 tab 1998 394 RM# 36489 pg 46 agage 3/ 29/ 1976 johnny. darter 1 RM# 36470 tab 1999 412 RM# 36490 pg 46 agage 3/ 29/ 1976 largemouth. bass 1 RM# 36470 tab 3/ 29/ 1976 hornyhead. chub 1 RM# 36470 tab 3/ 29/ 1976 redbelly. dace 3 RM# 36470 tab 5/ 14/ 1976 channel. catfish 0 RM# 36470 tab 8/ 16/ 1976 flathead. catfish 2 RM# 36470 tab 10/ 16/ 1976 flathead. catfish 0 RM# 36470 tab 10/ 16/ 1976 channel. catfish 0 RM# 36470 tab 10/ 16/ 1976 shiner 1 RM# 36470 tab 10/ 16/ 1976 bluntnose. minnow 1 RM# 36470 tab 2/ 15/ 1977 notropis 4 RM# 36471 tab 2/ 15/ 1977 channel. catfish 0 RM# 36471 tab 2/ 15/ 1977 quillback. carpsucker 2 RM# 36471 tab 6/ 7/ 1977 . 0 RM# 36471 tab 8/ 18/ 1977 notropis 0 RM# 36471 tab 11/ 14/ 1977 channel. catfish 0 RM# 36471 tab 11/ 14/ 1977 pimiephales. spp 1 RM# 36471 tab channel. catfish 29 RM# 36470 tab johnny. darter 1 RM# 36470 tab largemouth. bass 1 RM# 36470 tab hornyhead. chub 1 RM# 36470 tab redbelly. dace 3 RM# 36470 tab channel. catfish 0 RM# 36470 tab flathead. catfish 2 RM# 36470 tab flathead. catfish 0 RM# 36470 tab channel. catfish 0 RM# 36470 tab shiner 1 RM# 36470 tab bluntnose. minnow 1 RM# 36470 tab notropis 4 RM# 36471 tab channel. catfish 0 RM# 36471 tab quillback. carpsucker 2 RM# 36471 tab . 0RM# 36471 tab notropis 0 RM# 36471 tab channel. catfish 0 RM# 36471 tab pimiephales. spp 1 RM# 36471 tab composition% qc table 42 0.086956522 agage table 42 0.043478261 agage table 42 0.043478261 agage table 42 0.043478261 agage table 42 0.130434783 agage table 42 0.043478261 agage table 42 0.043478261 agage table 42 0.043478261 agage table 42 0.434782609 agage table 42 0.043478261 agage table 42 0.043478261 agage table 43 0.130434783 agage table 43 0.347826087 agage table 43 0.086956522 agage table 43 0 agage table 43 0.043478261 agage table 43 0.347826087 agage table 43 0.043478261 agage MEAN PCT COMP MEAN SUM MEAN LOSS table 42 0.630434783 800 504.4911067 table 42 0.02173913 800 17.39624506 table 42 0.02173913 800 17.39624506 table 42 0.02173913 800 17.39624506 table 42 0.065217391 800 52.18873518 table 42 0 800 0 table 42 0.043478261 800 34.79249012 table 42 0 800 0 table 42 0 800 0 table 42 0.02173913 800 17.39624506 table 42 0.02173913 800 17.39624506 table 43 0.086956522 800 69.58498024 table 43 0 800 0 table 43 0.043478261 800 34.79249012 table 43 0 800 0 table 43 0 800 0 table 43 0 800 0 table 43 0.02173913 800 17.39624506 table 42 0.608695652 800.2272727 504.4911067 table 42 0.02173913 800.2272727 17.39624506 table 42 0.02173913 800.2272727 17.39624506 table 42 0.02173913 800.2272727 17.39624506 table 42 0.065217391 800.2272727 52.18873518 table 42 0.02173913 800.2272727 0 table 42 0.02173913 800.2272727 34.79249012 table 42 0.02173913 800.2272727 0 table 42 0 800.2272727 0 table 42 0.02173913 800.2272727 17.39624506 table 42 0.02173913 800.2272727 17.39624506 table 43 0.086956522 800.2272727 69.58498024 table 43 0 800.2272727 0 table 43 0.043478261 800.2272727 34.79249012 table 43 0 800.2272727 0 table 43 0 800.2272727 0 table 43 0 800.2272727 0 table 43 0.02173913 800.2272727 17.39624506 Losses data for Duane Arnold Energy Center ( Iowa). Cooling water source: Cedar River Intake 316( b) Phase III A. Gage, 1/ 28/ 2003 Notes:

QC A. Gage


[Federal Register Volume 82, Number 17 (Friday, January 27, 2017)]
[Notices]
[Pages 8631-8632]
[FR Doc No: 2017-01830]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

[Release No. 34-79860; File No. SR-BatsEDGX-2016-33]

Self-Regulatory Organizations; Bats EDGX Exchange, Inc.; Notice
of Withdrawal of a Proposed Rule Change To Adopt an Options Regulatory
Fee

January 23, 2017.
    On July 20, 2016, Bats EDGX Exchange, Inc. (the ``Exchange'') filed
with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the ``Commission''),
pursuant to Section 19(b)(1) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934
(the ``Act''),\1\ and Rule 19b-4 thereunder,\2\ a proposed rule change
to adopt an Options Regulatory Fee (``ORF''). The proposed rule change
was published for comment in the Federal Register on

August 5, 2016.\3\ On September 15, 2016, the Commission temporarily
suspended the Exchange's proposal and simultaneously instituted
proceedings to determine whether to approve or disapprove the proposed
rule change.\4\ The Commission received no comments regarding the
proposal.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \1\ 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(1).
    \2\ 17 CFR 240.19b-4.
    \3\ See Securities Exchange Act Release No. 78452 (August 1,
2016), 81 FR 51951 (August 5, 2016).
    \4\ See Securities Exchange Act Release No. 78850, 81 FR 64963
(September 21, 2016).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    On January 10, 2017, the Exchange withdrew the proposed rule change
(SR-BatsEDGX-2016-33).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \5\ 17 CFR 200.30-3(a)(12).

    For the Commission, by the Division of Trading and Markets,
pursuant to delegated authority.\5\
Eduardo A. Aleman,
Assistant Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2017-01830 Filed 1-26-17; 8:45 am]
 BILLING CODE 8011-01-P


$6,162
Estimate final closure cost
                                                                              1
                                                                              8
                                                                              1
                                                                             $0
                                                                         $2,269
Write the closure schedule
                                                                           0.25
                                                                              1
                                                                              0
                                                                             $0
                                                                            $78
                                                Total Closure Plan Cost per LQG
                                                                         $8,509
Source: U.S. EPA, Supporting Statement for EPA Information Collection Request Number ICR 1573.14 "Part B Permit Application, Permit Modifications, and Special Permits," March 2016.
Contingency Planning (baseline)
Facilities that enter the LQG universe of affected facilities in the baseline are assumed to incur costs to develop a contingency plan.  As shown in Table A-4, development of a contingency plan involves the collection of data, documentation of input from authorities, drafting of the contingency plan, and submission of the contingency plan to relevant emergency centers.  This RIA estimates that the total cost of these activities, per plan, is $731.
Table A-4.	Contingency Plan Costs
                                   Activity
                             Technician Time (HRS)
                               Admin. Time (HRS)
                                 O&M Costs
                                  Total Cost
Collection of data
                                                                           3.35
                                                                           1.65
                                                                             $0
                                                                           $226
Document whether authorities decline arrangement
                                                                              0
                                                                            0.5
                                                                             $0
                                                                            $19
Write contingency plan
                                                                            7.5
                                                                            2.5
                                                                             $0
                                                                           $462
Submit plan to relevant emergency centers
                                                                              0
                                                                            0.5
                                                                          $5.73
                                                                            $24
                                            Total Contingency Plan Cost per LQG
                                                                           $731
Source: U.S. EPA, Supporting Statement for EPA Information Collection Request Number ICR 0820.14 Hazardous Waste Generator Standards, September 2014.
FIXED Annual Costs
Fixed annual costs include those costs that typically remain unchanged from year to year.
Annual Review of Regulations (baseline and with rule)
To keep up to date on regulatory developments, LQGs and SQGs are assumed to conduct an annual review of the regulations in the baseline.  This review involves a limited amount of legal, managerial, and technician time, as shown in Table A-5.  Facilities that opt to manage their aerosol cans as universal waste under the proposed rule are also assumed to incur costs associated with the annual review of the regulations.
Table A-5.	Annual Cost of Annual Review of Regulations
                             Baseline or With Rule
                           Generator/ Handler Status
                               Legal Time (HRs)
                             Managerial Time (HRS)
                             Technician Time (HRS)
                                  Total Cost
Baseline
                                      LQG
                                     0.25
                                     0.25
                                      0.5
                                    $93.24

                                      SQG
                                     0.15
                                     0.15
                                      0.4
                                    $60.87
With Rule
                                      LQH
                                     0.25
                                     0.25
                                      0.5
                                    $93.24

                                      SQH
                                     0.15
                                     0.15
                                      0.4
                                    $60.87
Source: U.S. EPA, Supporting Statement for EPA Information Collection Request Number ICR 0820.14 Hazardous Waste Generator Standards, September 2014.
Recordkeeping (baseline)
Under the RCRA Subtitle C regulations, LQGs and SQGs are required to maintain records of waste characterizations for three years from the date the last waste was sent off site.  In addition, LQGs and SQGs must gather and provide information as requested by EPA or state regulators.  Combined, these activities involve 0.25 hours of managerial time and 0.2 hours of a technician's time.  Combined with O&M costs of $2.50 to $3.00, these costs amount to approximately $41 per facility.
Biennial Reporting (baseline)
Under current regulations, LQGs must submit biennial reports of their hazardous waste generation activity to EPA or state authorities.  The fixed costs of preparing a biennial report include the time to read the instructions, complete the site ID form, gather information and prepare a GM form, submit the report to state authorities or EPA, and maintain a copy of the report for three years.  Table A-6 summarizes the personnel time to complete these activities and the associated costs.  As indicated in the table the total cost per cycle per LQG is approximately $837.  On an annualized basis, this translates to a cost of $463.
 Table A-6.	Costs of Biennial Reporting
                                   ACTIVITY
                              MANAGER TIME (HRS)
                             TECHNICIAN TIME (HRS)
                               ADMIN. TIME (HRS)
                                  LABOR COST
                                 O&M COST
                                  TOTAL COST
Read instructions
                                                                           1.08
                                                                           1.68
                                                                              0
                                                                        $205.57
                                                                             $0
                                                                        $205.57
Gather information and prepare form GM
                                                                           0.13
                                                                           0.15
                                                                           0.04
                                                                $23.66 per form
                                                                             $0
                                                                     $462.86[1]
Gather and prepare information for Site ID form
                                                                           0.08
                                                                            0.6
                                                                           0.16
                                                                         $44.57
                                                                             $0
                                                                         $44.57
Submit report
                                                                           0.82
                                                                           0.32
                                                                            0.2
                                                                        $116.47
                                                                          $6.57
                                                                        $123.05
Maintain a copy of form for three years
                                                                              0
                                                                           0.01
                                                                           0.02
                                                                          $1.23
                                                                             $0
                                                                          $1.23
                                                 Cost per facility per BR cycle
                                                                        $837.29
                                      Annualized cost per facility per BR cycle
                                                                        $463.10
Source:  U.S. EPA, Supporting Statement for EPA Information Collection Request Number 0976.18 "2017 Hazardous Waste Report, Notification of Regulated Waste Activity, and Part A Hazardous Waste Permit Application and Modification," December 2016.
Notes:
 Value assumes approximately 19.5 GM forms per facility on average based on data in the 2015 Biennial Report database.
Annual Employee Training (baseline and with rule)
For the baseline, the unit cost associated with training relevant employees at generator facilities was estimated separately for SQGs and LQGs.  To estimate training costs for SQGs, EPA assumes that such facilities will conduct informal training for two technicians and one manager.  EPA assumes that each of these employees receives four hours of training and that four hours of a manager's time are necessary to compile EPA guidance documents, fact sheets, and information on relevant company standard operating procedures.   Based on this information, we estimate that hazardous waste handler training for an SQG costs $1,341 per year per facility, as shown in Table A-7.
Relative to SQGs, we assume that LQGs will conduct more formalized training using an online training course supplemented with facility-specific information.   More specifically, we assume that four technicians and two managers receive eight hours of training per year.  In addition, the estimate of annual LQG training costs include 0.6 hours of clerical time for administrative requirements associated with the training (e.g., updating records, refresher/new class scheduling, etc.).  The class fee is estimated as $127 per trainee based on pricing from on-line providers, and facilities are assumed to incur an additional record-keeping cost of approximately $3 per year.  Based on the above, we estimate that hazardous waste handler training at LQGs costs $4,192 per year per facility per year.  Table A-7 summarizes these costs.
Table A-7.	UNIVERSAL WASTE TRAINING COSTS
                              Generator Category
                                     Cost
                                  Assumptions
LQG
                                                                         $4,192
4 technicians and 2 managers for 8 hour training, 0.6 hours for clerk, per trainee fee for class.
SQG
                                                                         $1,341
2 technicians and 1 manager for 4 hour training, 4 managerial hours to develop training, 1 hour for clerk
In addition to the general hazardous materials handling training, it is assumed that each SQG and LQG will train one technician and one manager to complete hazardous waste manifests once every three years.  This RIA assumes each facility trains one manager and one technician to complete manifests.  Employees are expected to receive a four-hour manifest training session once every three years.  As part of this training, this RIA assumes facilities will use EPA's free online hazardous waste manifest video.  The cost of manifest training also includes one hour of a manager's time to compile EPA's hazardous waste manifest instructions and other training materials.  Approximately 0.3 hours of administrative time will likely be incurred to schedule the training every three years.  Based on these estimates, the cost of manifest training is approximately $777 per facility once every three years (an annualized cost of $296, using a 7 percent discount rate).
Under the proposed rule, handlers of universal waste aerosol cans will incur training costs, but these costs are estimated to be lower than the training costs incurred by LQGs and SQGs in the baseline.  LQHs are assumed to train four technicians and two managers through a two-hour training, as shown in Table A-8.
TABLE A-8.	UNIVERSAL WASTE TRAINING COSTS
                               Handler Category
                                     Cost
                                  Assumptions
LQH
                                                                         $1,326
4 technicians and 2 managers for 2 hour training, 0.6 hrs for clerk, 4 managerial hours to develop training
SQH  -  Large Facility
                                                                           $652
4 technicians and 2 managers for 1 hour training, 2 managerial hours to develop training
SQH  -  Small Facility
                                                                           $440
2 technicians and 1 manager for 1 hour training, 2 managerial hours to develop training
Labeling (baseline)
Under the baseline, all containers at LQGs and SQGs must be marked with the words "Hazardous Waste," an indication of the hazards of the contents of the container, and the accumulation start date once the accumulate start date begins. This RIA assumes that a trained technician would label the containers. The annual costs of labeling are reported in Table A-9.  Additionally, there are no baseline labeling requirements for VSQGs.
Table A-9.	Annual Cost of Labeling
                               Generator Status
                                   Location
                           Estimated Technician Time
                                Estimated Cost
                     annual Cost of Labeling per facility
SQG
Primary Storage Area
0.25 hours[1]
$12.31
Primary & Satellite Storage Areas Combined: $24.62

Satellite Storage Areas
0.25 hours[1]
$12.31

LQG
Primary Storage Area
1.0 hour[2]
$49.22
Primary & Satellite Storage Areas Combined: $73.83

Satellite Storage Areas
0.50 hours[3]
$24.61

Source:
 U.S. EPA, Supporting Statement for EPA Information Collection Request Number ICR 0820.14 Hazardous Waste Generator Standards, September 2014.
Inspections (baseline)
LQGs and SQGs are required to conduct weekly inspections of hazardous waste storage areas.  This RIA assumes that a technician takes one hour to inspect all storage areas for an LQG or SQG, which implies a weekly inspection cost of $49.22 per LQG or SQG.  On an annual basis, this translates to a cost of $2,560 per LQG or SQG.
Variable Costs
Variable costs include those costs that are experienced throughout the year and vary by the quantity of hazardous waste generated, quantity of hazardous waste shipped, and the number of hazardous waste shipments made by each facility.
Manifests (baseline)
SQGs and LQGs of hazardous waste are required to prepare a manifest for each hazardous waste shipment and maintain a copy of the manifest for three years.  All facilities are also required to submit a landban notification for each shipment.  The cost to complete the manifest and landban notification is estimated at $58 per shipment for LQGs and $56 per shipment for SQGs.   Hazardous waste generators are also required to file exception reports if a copy of a completed manifest signed by the designated facility is not received within a specified timeframe (45 days for LQGs, 60 days for SQGs).  This is an infrequent and unpredictable event; therefore, costs associated with this activity were not estimated for this analysis.
Shipping Recordkeeping (with rule)
Under the universal waste rule requirements, LQHs must record all shipments received or shipped.  Logs, invoices, bills of lading, or other shipping documents constitute acceptable forms of records.  These records must be maintained for at least three years.  The cost to complete and maintain a record of universal waste shipments was estimated as $3.71 per shipment.
Transportation (baseline and with rule)
Under the baseline and the proposed rule, shipments of hazardous waste must use a certified hazardous waste transporter. This RIA assumes that each hazardous waste shipment has a fixed cost of $215 and an additional cost of $0.22 per ton-mile. Under the proposed rule, shipments of aerosol cans do not need to use a certified hazardous waste transporter, reducing shipping costs compared to hazardous waste shipments.  This RIA assumes that universal waste transportation cost $143 per shipment plus an additional $0.16 per ton-mile. Additionally, under the proposed rule, facilities that change generator status to become VSQGs may be able to ship non-aerosol can waste to landfills as MSW. Shipment of hazardous waste to landfills by VSQGs is allowed in 33 states and territories. EPA estimates that MSW transportation in these states costs $10.68 per ton.
Disposal (baseline and with rule)
Under the baseline and the proposed rule, this RIA assumes that hazardous wastes and universal wastes are disposed of through incineration. This RIA assumes that incineration of hazardous and universal waste costs $4,573.11 per ton. Under the proposed rule, facilities that change generator status to become VSQGs may be able to dispose of non-aerosol can wastes in landfills. Landfill disposal of hazardous wastes by VSQGs is allowed in 33 states and territories. EPA estimates that MSW disposal in these states costs $53.90 per ton.

Appendix B: Puncturing Options
This appendix analyzes the impact of a range of rule options that modify management standards with respect to the puncturing and draining of aerosol cans. Puncturing and draining is a common method of on-site aerosol can management. Puncturing and draining systems are commercially available and consist of an enclosed puncturing device and an attached 55-gallon drum which collects the drained contents.   Facilities can treat the drained can as scrap metal and the consolidated waste in the drum can be disposed of as hazardous waste.  One advantage of puncturing and draining aerosol cans is that it reduced the volume of hazardous waste that needs to be shipped off site for treatment. This analysis assumes that all on-site management of aerosol cans consists of puncturing and draining, as opposed to an alternative management method.
Under current RCRA regulations, generators are allowed to puncture and drain aerosol cans.  However, under this proposed regulation, EPA is considering five options that modify management standards with respect to puncturing and draining aerosol cans by UW handlers.  Since the universal waste designation would allow handlers to receive aerosol cans from other handlers, while simultaneously removing storage time limits, EPA is concerned about the potential for large buildups of aerosol cans at handlers that may not be properly equipped to puncture and drain such a large quantity of aerosol cans.  In California, Colorado, Utah, and New Mexico, aerosol cans are currently regulated as universal waste. In these states, puncturing and draining by handlers is allowed, but they must comply with explicit management standards.
The five options currently being considered by the EPA are:
Option 1: Puncturing and draining allowed at all handlers; no explicit management standards;
Option 2: Puncturing and draining allowed at all handlers; management standards similar to those required by CA,CO, UT, and NM;
Option 3: Puncturing and draining allowed at all handlers except handlers that are offsite commercial processors; management standards similar to those required by CA,CO, UT, and NM;
Option 4: Puncturing and draining at handlers only allowed for aerosol cans that are hazardous due to ignitability, and
Option 5: Puncturing and draining prohibited at handlers.
The primary analysis presented in the cost section of this RIA corresponds with Option 1.  Option 1 places the fewest restrictions on UW handlers and allows them to continue to manage their aerosol cans in the same way they currently do as HW generators.  For the primary analysis, EPA assumed that all aerosol cans managed on-site in the baseline would continue to be managed on-site in the post-rule scenario.
In order to create a bounded sensitivity analysis, this appendix models the most stringent option (Option 5).  Under Option 5, UW handlers would no longer be able to puncture and drain aerosol cans on site.  Generators that currently puncture and drain aerosol cans on site would be faced with a decision: A) continue to puncture and drain on-site and treat aerosol cans as hazardous waste (as opposed to universal waste), or B) treat the aerosol cans as universal waste and begin to ship them off-site for treatment.  As the most stringent option, EPA expects Option 5 to have the lowest cost-savings of all of the options.  EPA assumes that the cost savings associated with Options 2, 3, and 4 fall within the range bounded by Options 1 and 5.  The rest of this appendix examines the universe, methodology, and results related to Option 5.
Universe
The potential universe for Option 5 is slightly different than the universe for Option 1, because Option 5 has the potential to impact facilities in California, Colorado, Utah, and New Mexico.  Facilities in these states were excluded from the analysis of Option 1 because aerosol cans are already handled as universal waste in these states.  Under Option 5, facilities in these states that currently puncture and drain cans on site might need to ship them offsite for treatment.
Overall, EPA does not expect management of aerosol cans to differ greatly between Option 1 and Option 5, because the vast majority of facilities that generate aerosol cans ship them offsite in the baseline.  Out of the estimated 19,539 facilities in the universe for the primarily analysis, only 20 facilities managed aerosol cans on site in the 2015 BR data.  These 20 facilities managed 905 tons of aerosol cans, with the two largest generators of aerosol cans accounting for 856 of those tons.  EPA estimates that all but one of these facilities are LQGs based on generation tonnages in the 2015 BR Flat Files.
An additional 11 facilities in California indicated on-site management of 3.5 tons of aerosol cans.  One facility in Utah managed aerosol cans on site and no facilities in Colorado or New Mexico reported on-site management of aerosol cans.  The 11 facilities in California and 1 facility in Utah that currently manage aerosol cans on-site are all LQGs despite the fact that aerosol cans are currently considered UW in their state; therefore, they will remain LQGs after the rule goes into effect.  Since the California and Utah facilities will continue to operate as LQGs (and puncture and drain their aerosol cans as hazardous waste), the proposed rule is not expected to impact them.  As a result, EPA did not include facilities in California, Colorado, New Mexico, or Utah in the cost analysis of Option 5.  However, the BR data are unlikely to capture all aerosol-can management in the states where aerosol cans are already handled as UW, because facilities are not required to report UW waste activity in their BR reports. As a result, this analysis may underestimate the costs of Option 5 at facilities located in states where aerosol cans are already handled as UW.
Methodology
Under Option 5, the baseline costs for all facilities are the same as in the primary analysis. In the post-rule scenario, generators that currently manage aerosol cans on site would have the choice to either: A) continue to puncture and drain on site and treat aerosol cans as hazardous waste (as opposed to universal waste), or B) treat aerosol cans as universal waste and begin to ship them offsite for treatment. If facilities choose to continue managing aerosol cans as hazardous waste, then they will face the same compliance costs as under the baseline. If facilities choose to treat aerosol cans as universal waste, then they will incur additional costs associated with shipping aerosol cans offsite. In order to estimate the quantity of aerosol cans that would be shipped under Option 5 if a facility stopped managing aerosol cans on site, EPA summed the quantity of aerosol cans managed on site and the quantity of aerosol cans shipped in the baseline scenario.  For example, if a facility managed 15 tons of aerosol cans on site and shipped 10 tons of aerosol cans off-site in the baseline scenario, the facility would be expected to ship 25 tons off-site under Option 5 if they select to manage aerosol cans as UW.
After estimating the quantity of UW aerosol cans that would be shipped by each facility, EPA estimated the costs for each facility by using the methodology described in the primary analysis.  Facilities that had been managing aerosol cans onsite would face higher shipping costs under Option 5 as compared to Option 1. This analysis does not quantify the cost savings associated with ceasing to manage aerosol cans onsite. Instead, this analysis assumes that any cost savings will be roughly canceled out by additional disposal fees for the transported UW.
Similar to the primary analysis, Option 5 gives facilities the option to either ship hazardous waste and UW separately or ship them together and incur HW transportation costs.  Additionally, under Option 5, facilities are given the option of not treating their aerosol cans as UW and continuing to treat them onsite (without realizing any of the cost savings associated with the UW provisions).  EPA assumes that facilities would choose the least-cost option. EPA estimates that the majority of facilities that manage aerosol cans onsite in the baseline scenario would continue to manage aerosol cans onsite as hazardous waste under the Option 5 post-rule scenario. Additionally, this analysis assumes that facilities must choose to manage all of their aerosol can waste as either HW or UW. Facilities do not have the option to manage some aerosol cans on-site as hazardous waste and also ship other aerosol cans off-site as UW. If facilities do have the option to manage aerosol cans as both hazardous waste and UW, then this analysis could overestimate the costs associated with Option 5.

Results
Table B.1 summarizes the costs savings associated with Option 5. As the table demonstrates, annual cost savings are expected to range from $3.0 million (1.05%) to $3.5 million (1.23%).  In each case, cost savings under Option 5 are approximately $22,700 lower than under Option 1. As Table B.2 displays, the net present value of the costs savings for Option 5 range from $25.0 million to $68.6 million, depending on the timeframe of the analysis. These savings are $190,000 to $445,000 lower than under Option 1.
Table B.1:	Option 5 Annual Cost Savings
                                 Cost Category
                          Cost Savings ($ thousands)
                    Percentage Savings Relative to Baseline
One-Time Cost Savings
                                                                  $28.1 - $72.4
                                                                    0.7% - 1.3%

Fixed Annual Cost Savings
                                                                $1,830 - $1,910
                                                                    1.7% - 1.8%

Variable Cost Savings
                                                                $1,090 - $1,560
                                                                    0.6% - 0.9%

Total Yearly Cost Savings
                                                                $2,990 - $3,500
                                                                  1.05% - 1.23%

Table B.2:	Net Present Value of Option 5 Cost Savings
                                   Timeframe
                          Discount Rate ($ thousands)

                                   3 Percent
                                   7 Percent
13 Years
                               $31,800 - $37,200
                               $25,000 - $29,300
30 Years
                               $58,600 - $68,600
                               $37,100 - $43,400

Appendix C: Alternative Baseline Generator Status
This appendix presents the results of the cost analysis using an alternative methodology for determining the baseline generator status of affected facilities. In the primary cost analysis, EPA determined baseline facility generator status by calculating average monthly hazardous waste generation at each facility and comparing the quantities to RCRA monthly generation limits. In the alternative analysis presented in this appendix, EPA determined baseline generator status based on the "Calculated Generator Status" listed in EPA's RCRAinfo system and the "Federal Generator Status" listed in the 2015 BR Flat Files. If a facility was listed as an LQG in either of these systems, EPA treated the facility as an LQG in the baseline. The "Calculated Generator Status" field in the RCRAinfo system does not distinguish between SQGs and VSQGs. As a result, if a facility was listed as an SQG in the "Federal Generator Status" field from the BR Flat Files, EPA treated the facility as an SQG in the baseline. EPA assumed that all facilities not identified as LQGs or SQGs were VSQGs.
This methodology identified a greater number of LQGs (7,239 versus 6,520).  Because the total number of SQGs is estimated based on the number of LQGs and the ratio of LQGs to SQGs in three states with detailed generator data, this methodology also results in a higher estimate of affected SQGs (14,454 versus 13,019). After identifying generator status for each facility using the alternative methodology, EPA estimated the associated costs and cost savings of the Aerosol Can Universal Waste proposed rule using the same methodology and unit costs from the primary analysis.
Table C.1 presents baseline costs for the alternative generator status universe. Tables C.2 and C.3 display the post-rule changes in generator status and the post-rule cost estimates for the alternative generator status universe. Tables C.4 through C.6 present the net cost impacts of the proposed rule for the alternative generator status universe. Overall, the alternative methodology for estimating baseline generator status produces much larger estimates of cost savings than the primary analysis. EPA estimates annual cost savings ranging from $56.7 to $63.3 million for the alternative generator status universe, compared to $3.0 to $3.5 million in the primary analysis.
The majority of these additional cost savings are associated with changes to facility generator status. Using the alternative baseline generator status, EPA estimates that many more facilities change generator status in the post-rule scenario as compared to the primary analysis. This is because the alternative method for calculating generator status only applies to the baseline scenario. In the post-rule scenario, EPA cannot identify generator status based on the generator status fields in RCRAinfo or the BR Flat Files. As a result, EPA estimated post-rule generator status by comparing HW generation quantities to RCRA monthly generation limits, as in the primary analysis. However, many facilities in the alternative baseline generator status universe have lower HW generation than the threshold associated with their assigned generator status even before aerosol cans are excluded from the HW designation. As a result, the analysis presented in this appendix may overestimate the number of facilities that change generator status under the proposed rule and consequently may overestimate cost savings.
Table C.1:	Baseline Cost Results ($Millions) (Alternative Generator Status)
                                 Cost Category
                                     LQGs
                                     SQGs
                                     Total

                                 High Estimate
                                 Low Estimate
                                 High Estimate
                                 Low Estimate
                                 High Estimate
                                 Low Estimate
One-Time Costs
                                                                           $4.7
                                                                           $4.2
                                                                           $1.5
                                                                           $0.2
                                                                           $6.2
                                                                           $4.3
Fixed Annual Costs
                                                                          $55.9
                                                                          $55.9
                                                                          $62.5
                                                                          $62.5
                                                                         $118.4
                                                                         $118.4
Variable Costs
                                                                         $154.0
                                                                         $154.0
                                                                          $31.6
                                                                          $31.6
                                                                         $185.0
                                                                         $185.0
Total Costs
                                                                         $214.0
                                                                         $214.0
                                                                          $95.6
                                                                          $94.3
                                                                         $310.0
                                                                         $308.0
Table C.2:	Post-Rule Universe Distribution (Alternative Generator Status)
                           Baseline Generator Status
                    Post Rule Generator and Handler Status

                                      LQG
                                      SQG
                                     VSQG

                                     LQHUW
                                     SQHUW
                                     LQHUW
                                     SQHUW
                                     LQHUW
                                     SQHUW
LQG
                                                                          7,239
                                                                            122
                                                                          6,348
                                                                             38
                                                                            561
                                                                             11
                                                                            159
SQG
                                                                         14,454
                                                                              0
                                                                              0
                                                                              0
                                                                          3,007
                                                                             23
                                                                         11,424
Total
                                                                         21,693
                                     6,470
                                     3,606
                                    11,617
Table C.3:	Post-Rule Cost Results ($Millions) (Alternative Generator Status)
                                 Cost Category
                                     LQGs
                                      SQG
                                     VSQGs
                                     Total

                                 High Estimate
                                 Low Estimate
                                 High Estimate
                                 Low Estimate
                                 High Estimate
                                 Low Estimate
                                 High Estimate
                                 Low Estimate
One-Time Costs
                                                                           $4.2
                                                                           $3.7
                                                                           $1.4
                                                                           $0.2
                                                                           $0.0
                                                                           $0.0
                                                                           $5.6
                                                                           $3.9
Fixed Annual Costs
                                                                          $49.9
                                                                          $49.9
                                                                          $15.6
                                                                          $15.6
                                                                           $8.5
                                                                           $6.0
                                                                          $74.0
                                                                          $71.5
Variable Costs
                                                                         $146.2
                                                                         $146.2
                                                                           $3.3
                                                                           $3.3
                                                                          $24.4
                                                                          $20.0
                                                                         $174.0
                                                                         $169.0
Total Costs
                                                                         $200.3
                                                                         $199.8
                                                                          $20.2
                                                                          $19.0
                                                                          $32.8
                                                                          $26.0
                                                                         $253.0
                                                                         $245.0
TABLE C.4:	Cost Savings (Alternative Generator Status)
                                 Cost Category
                          Cost Savings ($ thousands)

                   Percentage Savings
Relative to Baseline
One-Time Cost Savings
                                                                    $432 - $635
                                                                  10.0% - 10.2%

Fixed Annual Cost Savings
                                                              $44,400 - $46,800
                                                                  37.5% - 39.6%

Variable Cost Savings
                                                              $11,700 - $16,000
                                                                    6.3% - 8.7%

Total Yearly Cost Savings
                                                              $56,700 - $63,300

Table C.5:	Annual Cost Savings associated with changes to generator status (Alternative Generator Status)
                                Baseline Status
                               Post-Rule Status
                    Cost Savings per Facility ($ thousands)
                                      LQG

SQG
                                                                          $3.40

VSQG (LQHUW)
                                                                           $6.3

VSQG (SQHUW)
                                                                    $7.0 - $7.2
                                      SQG
VSQG (LQHUW)
                                                                          $2.90

VSQG (SQHUW)
                                                                    $3.6 - $3.8
Table C.6:	Net Present Value of Cost Savings (Alternative Generator Status)
                                   Timeframe
                          Discount Rate ($ thousands)

                                   3 Percent
                                   7 Percent
13 Years
                              $603,000 - $673,000
                              $474,000 - $529,000
30 Years
                            $1,110,000 - $1,240,000
                              $704,000 - $785,000

Appendix D: Compliance Sensitivity Analysis
This appendix estimates the costs associated with a potential increase in compliance with RCRA hazardous waste regulations as a result of the proposed rule. One purpose of the universal waste program is to encourage compliance among regulated facilities. A universal waste designation incentivizes compliance with RCRA regulations by decreasing the costs and complexity associated with handling hazardous waste. An increase in compliance helps to ensure that hazardous waste is handled safely and shipped to properly equipped management facilities.
Anecdotal evidence indicates that non-compliance with hazardous waste regulations is currently a problem among generators of aerosol cans.  The extent to which non-compliance is an issue is unknown, as no data exist on the number of facilities that are not currently following RCRA protocols.  However, EPA expects that the designation of aerosol cans as universal waste will encourage a number of facilities that were previously not in compliance to begin complying with RCRA regulations.
For the purposes of this analysis, EPA assumes that all facilities that come into compliance with RCRA in the post-rule scenario will be SQGs or VSQGs. Related to this assumption, EPA also assumes that LQGs are unlikely to be among those facilities with improved RCRA compliance in the post-rule scenario because the universal waste designation generally does not provide significant cost savings for facilities that remain LQGs. Absent data on the extent of non-compliance among generators of aerosol cans, EPA estimates a range of facilities that will come into compliance with RCRA regulations as a result of the propose rule.  At the low-end, EPA assumes that the number of post-rule SQGs and VSQGs that handle aerosol cans will increase by 10 percent relative to the primary analysis (1,259 additional SQGs and 48 additional VSQGs), and at the high-end EPA assumes that the number of post-rule SQGs and VSQGs that handle aerosol cans will increase by 20 percent relative to the primary analysis (2,517 additional SQGs and 97 new VSQGs).
Facilities that attain compliance in the post-rule scenario will face new costs associated with RCRA compliance. Upon attaining compliance, these facilities will incur one-time costs associated with rule familiarization and notification of hazardous waste activity. Additionally, these facilities will incur new fixed annual compliance costs, such as inspection costs for new SQGs, and new variable costs, such as shipment recordkeeping for new LQHUWs. Table 7 in the cost section of the primary analysis summarizes all of the annual and variable costs incurred by SQGs and Table 10 summarizes the annual and variable costs associated with VSQGs that are UW handlers.
EPA estimated the one-time costs incurred by facilities attaining compliance by multiplying the estimated number of new SQGs and VSQGs (10 percent to 20 percent of the post-rule universe) by the relevant one-time unit costs. Additionally, EPA estimated the annual costs incurred by these new facilities (inclusive of fixed annual costs and variable costs) by multiplying the post-rule costs for SQGs and VSQGs by 10 percent in the low-end and 20 percent in the high-end. In the 10 percent compliance increase scenario, newly compliant facilities experience one-time costs of $0.3 million to $2.3 million, and annual costs increase by $8.0 to $8.2 million. In the 20 percent compliance increase scenario, one-time costs and additional annual costs are twice as large. Tables D.1 and D.2 summarize the compliance costs associated with the 10 percent and 20 percent compliance increase scenarios, respectively.
Table D.1:	Costs in the 10% Compliance Increase Scenario($ thousands)
                                 Cost Category
                                 High Estimate
                                 Low Estimate
Annual Costs Incurred by Newly Compliant Facilities
One-Time Costs for New Facilities
                                                                           $134
                                                                          $16.7

Fixed Annual Costs
                                                                         $5,480
                                                                         $5,470

Variable Costs
                                                                         $2,590
                                                                         $2,540

Total Yearly Costs
                                                                         $8,210
                                                                         $8,030
One-time Costs Incurred by Newly Compliance Facilities
Total One-Time Costs for Facilities Attaining Compliance Post-Rule
                                                                         $2,280
                                                                           $284
Table D.2:	Costs in the 20% Compliance Increase Scenario ($ thousands)
                                 Cost Category
                                 High Estimate
                                 Low Estimate
Annual Costs Incurred by Newly Compliant Facilities
One-Time Costs for New Facilities
                                                                           $269
                                                                          $33.5

Fixed Annual Costs
                                                                        $11,000
                                                                        $10,900

Variable Costs
                                                                         $5,180
                                                                         $5,090

Total Yearly Costs
                                                                        $16,400
                                                                        $16,100
One-time Costs Incurred by Newly Compliance Facilities
Total One-Time Costs for Facilities Attaining Compliance Post-Rule
                                                                         $4,550
                                                                           $567


[Federal Register Volume 81, Number 169 (Wednesday, August 31, 2016)]
[Notices]
[Pages 59998-60000]
[FR Doc No: 2016-20972]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission

Combined Notice of Filings #1

    Take notice that the Commission received the following exempt
wholesale generator filings:

    Docket Numbers: EG16-141-000.
    Applicants: Luning Energy Holdings LLC.
    Description: Notice of Self-Certification of Exempt Wholesale
Generator Status of Luning Energy Holdings LLC.
    Filed Date: 8/25/16.
    Accession Number: 20160825-5050.
    Comments Due: 5 p.m. ET 9/15/16.

    Docket Numbers: EG16-142-000.
    Applicants: Luning Energy LLC.
    Description: Notice of Self-Certification of Exempt Wholesale
Generator Status of Luning Energy LLC.
    Filed Date: 8/25/16.
    Accession Number: 20160825-5051.
    Comments Due: 5 p.m. ET 9/15/16.

    Take notice that the Commission received the following electric
rate filings:

    Docket Numbers: ER10-1818-012; ER10-1817-013; ER10-1819-014; ER10-
1820-017.
    Applicants: Public Service Company of Colorado, Southwestern Public
Service Company, Northern States Power Company, a Minnesota
corporation, Northern States Power Company, a Wisconsin corporation.
    Description: Supplement to January 14, 2016 Triennial Market Power

Analysis and Notice of Change in Status of Public Service Company of
Colorado, et al.
    Filed Date: 8/24/16.
    Accession Number: 20160824-5268.
    Comments Due: 5 p.m. ET 10/24/16.

    Docket Numbers: ER15-2589-002.
    Applicants: CPV Shore, LLC.
    Description: Compliance filing: Compliance Filing of Reactive Power
Service Rate Schedule to be effective 1/1/2016.
    Filed Date: 8/25/16.
    Accession Number: 20160825-5133.
    Comments Due: 5 p.m. ET 9/15/16.

    Docket Numbers: ER16-521-002.
    Applicants: Midcontinent Independent System Operator, Inc.
    Description: Compliance filing: 2016-08-25 Att Y align with PRA
Compliance to be effective 2/12/2016.
    Filed Date: 8/25/16.
    Accession Number: 20160825-5136.
    Comments Due: 5 p.m. ET 9/15/16.

    Docket Numbers: ER16-2169-001.
    Applicants: Algonquin SKIC 20 Solar, LLC.
    Description: Tariff Amendment: Amendment to Application for Initial
Tariff to be effective 7/14/2016.
    Filed Date: 8/24/16.
    Accession Number: 20160824-5225.
    Comments Due: 5 p.m. ET 9/14/16.

    Docket Numbers: ER16-2226-001.
    Applicants: McHenry Battery Storage, LLC.
    Description: Tariff Amendment: Supplement to McHenry Battery
Storage Petition for Market-Based Rate Authority to be effective 7/19/
2016.
    Filed Date: 8/24/16.
    Accession Number: 20160824-5226.
    Comments Due: 5 p.m. ET 9/14/16.

    Docket Numbers: ER16-2227-001.
    Applicants: Kelly Creek Wind, LLC.
    Description: Tariff Amendment: Kelly Creek Wind Supplement to
Petition for Market-Based Rate Authority to be effective 9/17/2016.
    Filed Date: 8/24/16.
    Accession Number: 20160824-5228.
    Comments Due: 5 p.m. ET 9/14/16.

    Docket Numbers: ER16-2289-001.
    Applicants: Golden Fields Solar I, LLC.
    Description: Tariff Amendment: Supplement to App. for MBR
Authorization in Response to Informal Staff Request to be effective 8/
1/2016.
    Filed Date: 8/25/16.
    Accession Number: 20160825-5173.
    Comments Due: 5 p.m. ET 9/15/16.

    Docket Numbers: ER16-2477-000.
    Applicants: AES Alamitos, LLC.
    Description: Sec.  205(d) Rate Filing: AES Alamitos Tariff Update
Filing to be effective 8/26/2016.
    Filed Date: 8/25/16.
    Accession Number: 20160825-5137.
    Comments Due: 5 p.m. ET 9/15/16.

    Docket Numbers: ER16-2478-000.
    Applicants: AES Energy Storage, LLC.
    Description: Sec.  205(d) Rate Filing: AES Energy Strg Tariff
Updates Filing to be effective 8/26/2016.
    Filed Date: 8/25/16.
    Accession Number: 20160825-5138.
    Comments Due: 5 p.m. ET 9/15/16.

    Docket Numbers: ER16-2479-000.
    Applicants: AES ES Tait, LLC.
    Description: Sec.  205(d) Rate Filing: AES ES Tait Tariff Update
Filing to be effective 8/26/2016.
    Filed Date: 8/25/16.
    Accession Number: 20160825-5139.
    Comments Due: 5 p.m. ET 9/15/16.

    Docket Numbers: ER16-2480-000.
    Applicants: AES Huntington Beach, L.L.C.
    Description: Sec.  205(d) Rate Filing: AES Huntington Bch Tariff
Updates Filing to be effective 8/26/2016.
    Filed Date: 8/25/16.
    Accession Number: 20160825-5144.
    Comments Due: 5 p.m. ET 9/15/16.

    Docket Numbers: ER16-2481-000.
    Applicants: AES Laurel Mountain, LLC.
    Description: Sec.  205(d) Rate Filing: AES Laurel Mtn Tariff
Updates Filing to be effective 8/26/2016.
    Filed Date: 8/25/16.
    Accession Number: 20160825-5147.
    Comments Due: 5 p.m. ET 9/15/16.

    Docket Numbers: ER16-2482-000.
    Applicants: AES Redondo Beach, L.L.C.
    Description: Sec.  205(d) Rate Filing: AES Redondo Bch Tariff
Updates Filing to be effective 8/26/2016.
    Filed Date: 8/25/16.
    Accession Number: 20160825-5148.
    Comments Due: 5 p.m. ET 9/15/16.

    Docket Numbers: ER16-2483-000.
    Applicants: Mountain View Power Partners, LLC.
    Description: Sec.  205(d) Rate Filing: Mountain View Tariff Updates
Filing to be effective 8/26/2016.
    Filed Date: 8/25/16.
    Accession Number: 20160825-5149.
    Comments Due: 5 p.m. ET 9/15/16.

    Docket Numbers: ER16-2484-000.
    Applicants: Mountain View Power Partners IV, LLC.
    Description: Sec.  205(d) Rate Filing: Mtn View IV Tariff Updates
Filing to be effective 8/26/2016.
    Filed Date: 8/25/16.
    Accession Number: 20160825-5150.
    Comments Due: 5 p.m. ET 9/15/16.

    Docket Numbers: ER16-2485-000.
    Applicants: California Independent System Operator Corporation.
    Description: Sec.  205(d) Rate Filing: 2016-08-25 DSHBAOA with APS
to be effective 10/25/2016.
    Filed Date: 8/25/16.
    Accession Number: 20160825-5152.
    Comments Due: 5 p.m. ET 9/15/16.

    Docket Numbers: ER16-2486-000.
    Applicants: Southwest Power Pool, Inc.
    Description: Sec.  205(d) Rate Filing: 2502R1 Osage Wind/OG&E
Facilities Construction Agreement to be effective 8/8/2016.
    Filed Date: 8/25/16.
    Accession Number: 20160825-5153.
    Comments Due: 5 p.m. ET 9/15/16.

    Docket Numbers: ER16-2487-000.
    Applicants: Idaho Power Company.
    Description: Sec.  205(d) Rate Filing: Resubmitted SA 358--
Construction Agree w/PAC for Siphon-Pingree Line Rebuild to be
effective 8/8/2016.
    Filed Date: 8/25/16.
    Accession Number: 20160825-5157.
    Comments Due: 5 p.m. ET 9/15/16.

    Docket Numbers: ER16-2488-000.
    Applicants: Southwest Power Pool, Inc.
    Description: Sec.  205(d) Rate Filing: 1771R6 NPPD NITSA NOA Notice
of Cancellation to be effective 6/1/2016.
    Filed Date: 8/25/16.
    Accession Number: 20160825-5162.
    Comments Due: 5 p.m. ET 9/15/16.

    Docket Numbers: ER16-2489-000.
    Applicants: Brady Interconnection, LLC.
    Description: Baseline eTariff Filing: Brady, Brady II, and Brady
Interconnection, LLC Shared Facilities Agreement to be effective 10/1/
2016.
    Filed Date: 8/25/16.
    Accession Number: 20160825-5164.
    Comments Due: 5 p.m. ET 9/15/16.

    Docket Numbers: ER16-2490-000.
    Applicants: PacifiCorp.
    Description: Sec.  205(d) Rate Filing: SVEC ? Ancillary Services
Agreement to be effective 9/1/2016.
    Filed Date: 8/25/16.
    Accession Number: 20160825-5168.
    Comments Due: 5 p.m. ET 9/15/16.

    The filings are accessible in the Commission's eLibrary system by
clicking on the links or querying the docket number.
    Any person desiring to intervene or protest in any of the above
proceedings must file in accordance with Rules 211 and 214 of the
Commission's Regulations (18 CFR 385.211 and 385.214) on or before 5:00
p.m. Eastern time on the specified comment date. Protests may be
considered, but intervention is necessary to become a party to the
proceeding.
    eFiling is encouraged. More detailed information relating to filing

requirements, interventions, protests, service, and qualifying
facilities filings can be found at: http://www.ferc.gov/docs-filing/efiling/filing-req.pdf. For other information, call<PHONE_NUMBER>
(toll free). For TTY, call<PHONE_NUMBER>.

    Dated: August 25, 2016.
Kimberly D. Bose,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2016-20972 Filed 8-30-16; 8:45 am]
 BILLING CODE 6717-01-P


[Federal Register Volume 83, Number 25 (Tuesday, February 6, 2018)]
[Notices]
[Pages 5287-5288]
[FR Doc No: 2018-02271]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

[Release No. 34-82609; File No. SR-Phlx-2018-12]

Self-Regulatory Organizations; Nasdaq PHLX LLC; Notice of Filing
and Immediate Effectiveness of Proposed Rule Change To Relocate the
Execution Protections Rule

January 31, 2018.
    Pursuant to Section 19(b)(1) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934
(``Act''),\1\ and Rule 19b-4 thereunder,\2\ notice is hereby given that
on January 24, 2018, Nasdaq PHLX LLC (``Phlx'' or ``Exchange'') filed
with the Securities and Exchange Commission (``Commission'') the
proposed rule change as described in Items I and II below, which Items
have been prepared by the Exchange. The Commission is publishing this
notice to solicit comments on the proposed rule change from interested
persons.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \1\ 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(1).
    \2\ 17 CFR 240.19b-4.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

I. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement of the Terms of Substance
of the Proposed Rule Change

    The Exchange proposes to relocate Execution Protections currently
located at Phlx Rule 1080(p) to new Phlx Rule 1099 and entitle the rule
``Order Protections.'' The Exchange proposes to amend certain words
within the current rule text to conform the language within this Rule
1080(p).
    The text of the proposed rule change is available on the Exchange's
website at http://nasdaqphlx.cchwallstreet.com/, at the principal
office of the Exchange, and at the Commission's Public Reference Room.

II. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement of the Purpose of, and
Statutory Basis for, the Proposed Rule Change

    In its filing with the Commission, the Exchange included statements
concerning the purpose of and basis for the proposed rule change and
discussed any comments it received on the proposed rule change. The
text of these statements may be examined at the places specified in
Item IV below. The Exchange has prepared summaries, set forth in
sections A, B, and C below, of the most significant aspects of such
statements.

A. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement of the Purpose of, and
Statutory Basis for, the Proposed Rule Change

1. Purpose
    The Exchange proposes to relocate Execution Protections currently
located at Phlx Rule 1080(p) to new Phlx Rule 1099 and entitle the rule
``Order Protections.'' The Exchange also proposes to conform certain
rule text within the current rule throughout new Rule 1099.
    The Exchange proposes to utilize the term ``System'' throughout new
Rule 1099 instead of the terms ``Phlx XL'' or ``system.'' \3\ The
Exchange also proposes to remove the term ``Phlx'' and replace it with
the word ``Exchange.'' These non-substantive rule changes are meant to
simply conform terms within the new Rule for consistency.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \3\ System is defined at Phlx Rule 1000(45).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    Locating these order protection rules within new Rule 1099 will
make them easier to locate and also shorten the length of Rule 1080 for
ease of reading that rule.
    The Exchange also proposes to update cross-references to Rule
1080(p) to Rule 1099.\4\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \4\ The Exchange proposes to amend cross-references in Rule 1082
(Firm Quotations) and Rule 1098 (Complex Orders on the System).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

2. Statutory Basis
    The Exchange believes that its proposal is consistent with Section
6(b) of the Act,\5\ in general, and furthers the objectives of Section
6(b)(5) of the Act,\6\ in particular, in that it is designed to promote
just and equitable principles of

trade and to protect investors and the public interest by consistently
utilizing the term ``System'' throughout new Rule 1099 instead of the
terms ``Phlx XL'' or ``system.'' The Exchange also proposes to remove
the term ``Phlx'' and replace it with the word ``Exchange.'' The
Exchange believes that this proposal is consistent with the Act because
the Exchange is conforming terms within the new Rule for consistency
and relocating these order protection rules within new Rule 1099 to
make them easier to locate and also shorten the length of Rule 1080 for
ease of reading.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \5\ 15 U.S.C. 78f(b).
    \6\ 15 U.S.C. 78f(b)(5).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    The Exchange also proposes to make certain formatting changes
within the Rule to conform the text throughout its Rulebook.

B. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement on Burden on Competition

    The Exchange does not believe that the proposed rule change will
impose any burden on competition not necessary or appropriate in
furtherance of the purposes of the Act. The Exchange's proposal does
not impose an undue burden on competition because the amendments
conform the rule text to text throughout the Rulebook and the proposal
relocates the order protection rules to a new Rule 1099 for ease of
reference.

C. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement on Comments on the Proposed
Rule Change Received From Members, Participants, or Others

    No written comments were either solicited or received.

III. Date of Effectiveness of the Proposed Rule Change and Timing for
Commission Action

    Because the foregoing proposed rule change does not: (i)
Significantly affect the protection of investors or the public
interest; (ii) impose any significant burden on competition; and (iii)
become operative for 30 days from the date on which it was filed, or
such shorter time as the Commission may designate, it has become
effective pursuant to Section 19(b)(3)(A)(iii) of the Act \7\ and
subparagraph (f)(6) of Rule 19b-4 thereunder.\8\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \7\ 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(3)(A)(iii).
    \8\ 17 CFR 240.19b-4(f)(6). In addition, Rule 19b-4(f)(6)
requires a self-regulatory organization to give the Commission
written notice of its intent to file the proposed rule change, along
with a brief description and text of the proposed rule change, at
least five business days prior to the date of filing of the proposed
rule change, or such shorter time as designated by the Commission.
The Exchange has satisfied this requirement.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    At any time within 60 days of the filing of the proposed rule
change, the Commission summarily may temporarily suspend such rule
change if it appears to the Commission that such action is: (i)
Necessary or appropriate in the public interest; (ii) for the
protection of investors; or (iii) otherwise in furtherance of the
purposes of the Act. If the Commission takes such action, the
Commission shall institute proceedings to determine whether the
proposed rule should be approved or disapproved.

IV. Solicitation of Comments

    Interested persons are invited to submit written data, views, and
arguments concerning the foregoing, including whether the proposed rule
change is consistent with the Act. Comments may be submitted by any of
the following methods:

Electronic Comments

     Use the Commission's internet comment form (http://www.sec.gov/rules/sro.shtml); or
     Send an email to ru[email protected]. Please include
File Number SR-Phlx-2018-12 on the subject line.

Paper Comments

     Send paper comments in triplicate to Secretary, Securities
and Exchange Commission, 100 F Street NE, Washington, DC 20549-1090.
All submissions should refer to File Number SR-Phlx-2018-12. This file
number should be included on the subject line if email is used. To help
the Commission process and review your comments more efficiently,
please use only one method. The Commission will post all comments on
the Commission's internet website (http://www.sec.gov/rules/sro.shtml).
Copies of the submission, all subsequent amendments, all written
statements with respect to the proposed rule change that are filed with
the Commission, and all written communications relating to the proposed
rule change between the Commission and any person, other than those
that may be withheld from the public in accordance with the provisions
of 5 U.S.C. 552, will be available for website viewing and printing in
the Commission's Public Reference Room, 100 F Street NE, Washington, DC
20549 on official business days between the hours of 10:00 a.m. and
3:00 p.m. Copies of the filing also will be available for inspection
and copying at the principal office of the Exchange. All comments
received will be posted without change. Persons submitting comments are
cautioned that we do not redact or edit personal identifying
information from comment submissions. You should submit only
information that you wish to make available publicly. All submissions
should refer to File Number SR-Phlx-2018-12, and should be submitted on
or before February 27, 2018.

    For the Commission, by the Division of Trading and Markets,
pursuant to delegated authority.\9\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \9\ 17 CFR 200.30-3(a)(12).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

Eduardo A. Aleman,
Assistant Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2018-02271 Filed 2-5-18; 8:45 am]
 BILLING CODE 8011-01-P


[Federal Register Volume 81, Number 27 (Wednesday, February 10, 2016)]
[Notices]
[Page 7091]
[FR Doc No: 2016-02618]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission

Combined Notice of Filings

    Take notice that the Commission has received the following Natural
Gas Pipeline Rate and Refund Report filings:

Filings Instituting Proceedings

    Docket Numbers: RP16-581-000.
    Applicants: Alliance Pipeline L.P.
    Description: Sec.  4(d) Rate Filing: Processing Requirements to be
effective 3/1/2016.
    Filed Date: 2/2/16.
    Accession Number: 20160202-5127.
    Comments Due: 5 p.m. ET 2/16/16.

    Docket Numbers: RP16-582-000.
    Applicants: Tennessee Gas Pipeline Company, L.L.C.
    Description: Sec.  4(d) Rate Filing: Volume No. 2--Seneca Resources
Corp--Amend NRA No. 315568 to be effective 12/1/2015.
    Filed Date: 2/2/16.
    Accession Number: 20160202-5249.
    Comments Due: 5 p.m. ET 2/16/16.

    Any person desiring to intervene or protest in any of the above
proceedings must file in accordance with Rules 211 and 214 of the
Commission's Regulations (18 CFR Sec.  385.211 and Sec.  385.214) on or
before 5:00 p.m. Eastern time on the specified comment date. Protests
may be considered, but intervention is necessary to become a party to
the proceeding.

Filings in Existing Proceedings

    Docket Numbers: RP10-1083-008,
    Applicants: Eastern Shore Natural Gas Company,
    Description: Compliance filing Compliance Filing ??? Order No. 587-
W to be effective 4/1/2016,
    Filed Date: 2/2/16,
    Accession Number: 20160202-5002,
    Comments Due: 5 p.m. ET 2/16/16,

    Any person desiring to protest in any of the above proceedings must
file in accordance with Rule 211 of the Commission's Regulations (18
CFR Sec.  385.211) on or before 5:00 p.m. Eastern time on the specified
comment date.
    The filings are accessible in the Commission's eLibrary system by
clicking on the links or querying the docket number.
    eFiling is encouraged. More detailed information relating to filing
requirements, interventions, protests, service, and qualifying
facilities filings can be found at: http://www.ferc.gov/docs-filing/efiling/filing-req.pdf. For other information, call<PHONE_NUMBER>
(toll free). For TTY, call<PHONE_NUMBER>.

    Dated: February 3, 2016.
Nathaniel J. Davis, Sr.,
Deputy Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2016-02618 Filed 2-9-16; 8:45 am]
 BILLING CODE 6717-01-P