[Federal Register: October 6, 2010 (Volume 75, Number 193)]
[Notices]
[Page 61742-61744]
[DOCID:fr06oc10-73]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission

Combined Notice of Filings 1

September 9, 2010.
    Take notice that the Commission received the following exempt
wholesale generator filings:

    Docket Numbers: EG10-67-000.
    Applicants: Chestnut Flats Wind, LLC.
    Description: Self-Certification of Exempt Wholesale Generator of
Chestnut Flats Wind, LLC.
    Filed Date: 09/09/2010.
    Accession Number: 20100909-5062.
    Comment Date: 5 p.m. Eastern Time on Thursday, September 30, 2010.

    Take notice that the Commission received the following electric
rate filings:

    Docket Numbers: ER06-1331-006.
    Applicants: CalPeak Power LLC, CalPeak Power--Panoche LLC, CalPeak
Power--Vaca Dixon LLC, CalPeak Power--El Cajon LLC, CalPeak Power--
Enterprise LLC, CalPeak Power--Border LLC, Tyr Energy LLC.
    Description: CalPeak Power LLC submits supplemental information.
    Filed Date: 08/24/2010.
    Accession Number: 20100824-5134.
    Comment Date: 5 p.m. Eastern Time on Tuesday, September 14, 2010.

    Docket Numbers: ER10-566-001; ER08-1255-003; ER07-1106-009; ER08-
1255-004.
    Applicants: ArcLight Energy Marketing, LLC, Oak Creek Wind Power,
LLC, Coso Geothermal Power Holdings, LLC.
    Description: Coso Geothermal Power Holdings, LLC and Oak Creek Wind
Power, LLC submits Supplement to Updated Market Power Analysis for the
Southwest Region.
    Filed Date: 09/08/2010.
    Accession Number: 20100908-5162.
    Comment Date: 5 p.m. Eastern Time on Wednesday, September 29, 2010.

    Docket Numbers: ER10-1816-001.
    Applicants: The Dayton Power and Light Company.
    Description: The Dayton Power and Light Company submits tariff
filing per 35: FERC Rate Schedule No. 42, Village of Arcanum to be
effective 9/9/2010.

    Filed Date: 09/09/2010.
    Accession Number: 20100909-5149.
    Comment Date: 5 p.m. Eastern Time on Thursday, September 30, 2010.

    Docket Numbers: ER10-2453-000.
    Applicants: Icetec.
    Description: Icetec, Inc submits Petition for Acceptance of Initial
Tariff, Waivers and Blanket Authority.
    Filed Date: 08/30/2010.
    Accession Number: 20100830-0205.
    Comment Date: 5 p.m. Eastern Time on Monday, September 20, 2010.

    Docket Numbers: ER10-2454-000.
    Applicants: Westar Energy, Inc.
    Description: Western Resources, Inc submits Notice of Cancellation
of Non-Firm Point-to-Point Transmission Service Agreements.
    Filed Date: 08/30/2010.
    Accession Number: 20100830-0204.
    Comment Date: 5 p.m. Eastern Time on Monday, September 20, 2010.

    Docket Numbers: ER10-2456-000.
    Applicants: California Independent System Operator Corporation.
    Description: California Independent System Operator Corporation
submits tariff filing per 35: 2010-08-30 CAISO Financial Security
Deposit Compliance EL10-15 to be effective 7/1/2010.
    Filed Date: 08/30/2010.
    Accession Number: 20100830-5145.
    Comment Date: 5 p.m. Eastern Time on Monday, September 20, 2010.

    Docket Numbers: ER10-2550-000.
    Applicants: California Independent System Operator Corporation.
    Description: California Independent System Operator Corporation
submits tariff filing per 35.13(a)(2)(iii): 2010-09-07 Amd 2 to CAISO
Service Agreement 798 to be effective 9/28/2010.
    Filed Date: 09/07/2010.
    Accession Number: 20100907-5134.
    Comment Date: 5 p.m. Eastern Time on Tuesday, September 28, 2010.

    Docket Numbers: ER10-2551-000.
    Applicants: Baldwin Wind, LLC.
    Description: Baldwin Wind, LLC submits tariff filing per 35.12:
Baldwin Wind, LLC MBR Application FINAL to be effective 10/15/2010.
    Filed Date: 09/07/2010.
    Accession Number: 20100907-5136.
    Comment Date: 5 p.m. Eastern Time on Tuesday, September 28, 2010.

    Docket Numbers: ER10-2565-000.
    Applicants: MidAmerican Energy Company.
    Description: MidAmerican Energy Company submits a Notice of
Cancellation of the Partial Requirements Wholesale Service Agreement.
    Filed Date: 09/08/2010.
    Accession Number: 20100909-0202.
    Comment Date: 5 p.m. Eastern Time on Wednesday, September 29, 2010.

    Docket Numbers: ER10-2566-000.
    Applicants: Duke Energy Carolinas, LLC.
    Description: Duke Energy Carolinas, LLC submits tariff filing per
35.12: DEC Baseline Filing to be effective 9/9/2010.
    Filed Date: 09/09/2010.
    Accession Number: 20100909-5016.
    Comment Date: 5 p.m. Eastern Time on Thursday, September 30, 2010.

    Docket Numbers: ER10-2567-000.
    Applicants: Kit Carson Windpower, LLC.
    Description: Kit Carson Windpower, LLC submits tariff filing per
35.12: Market Based Rate Application to be effective 10/1/2010.
    Filed Date: 09/09/2010.
    Accession Number: 20100909-5037.
    Comment Date: 5 p.m. Eastern Time on Thursday, September 30, 2010.

    Docket Numbers: ER10-2568-000.
    Applicants: Chestnut Flats Wind, LLC.
    Description: Chestnut Flats Wind, LLC submits tariff filing per
35.12: Market-Based Rate Tariff to be effective 11/15/2010.
    Filed Date: 09/09/2010.
    Accession Number: 20100909-5052.
    Comment Date: 5 p.m. Eastern Time on Thursday, September 30, 2010.

    Docket Numbers: ER10-2569-000.
    Applicants: New York Independent System Operator, Inc.
    Description: New York Independent System Operator, Inc. submits
tariff filing per 35.13(a)(2)(iii): 205 Filing--RS 1 provisions--
Messonnier/Lampi 09/09/10 to be effective 11/8/2010.
    Filed Date: 09/09/2010.
    Accession Number: 20100909-5075.
    Comment Date: 5 p.m. Eastern Time on Thursday, September 30, 2010.

    Docket Numbers: ER10-2570-000.
    Applicants: Shady Hills Power Company LLC.
    Description: Shady Hills Power Company LLC submits tariff filing
per 35.12: Shady Hills Power Company LLC Market Based Rate Tariff to be
effective 9/9/2010.
    Filed Date: 09/09/2010.
    Accession Number: 20100909-5096.
    Comment Date: 5 p.m. Eastern Time on Thursday, September 30, 2010.

    Docket Numbers: ER10-2571-000.
    Applicants: Wisconsin Electric Power Company.
    Description: Wisconsin Electric Power Company submits tariff filing
per 35: Coordination Sales Tariff Baseline Filing to be effective 9/9/
2010.
    Filed Date: 09/09/2010.
    Accession Number: 20100909-5101.
    Comment Date: 5 p.m. Eastern Time on Thursday, September 30, 2010.

    Docket Numbers: ER10-2572-000.
    Applicants: Wisconsin Electric Power Company.
    Description: Wisconsin Electric Power Company submits tariff filing
per 35: Tariff for Sales of Ancillary Services Baseline Filing to be
effective 9/9/2010.
    Filed Date: 09/09/2010.
    Accession Number: 20100909-5132.
    Comment Date: 5 p.m. Eastern Time on Thursday, September 30, 2010.

    Docket Numbers: ER10-2573-000.
    Applicants: Portland General Electric Company.
    Description: Portland General Electric Company submits tariff
filing per 35.12: Baseline Filing of PGE's OATT Fourth Revised Volume
No. 8 to be effective 9/10/2010.
    Filed Date: 09/09/2010.
    Accession Number: 20100909-5146.
    Comment Date: 5 p.m. Eastern Time on Thursday, September 30, 2010.

    Docket Numbers: ER10-2574-000.
    Applicants: BP West Coast Products LLC.
    Description: BP West Coast Products LLC submits tariff filing per
35.12: Baseline MBR Tariff Filing of BP West Coast Products LLC to be
effective 9/10/2010.
    Filed Date: 09/09/2010.
    Accession Number: 20100909-5147.
    Comment Date: 5 p.m. Eastern Time on Thursday, September 30, 2010.

    Any person desiring to intervene or to protest in any of the above
proceedings must file in accordance with Rules 211 and 214 of the
Commission's Rules of Practice and Procedure (18 CFR 385.211 and
385.214) on or before 5 p.m. Eastern time on the specified comment
date. It is not necessary to separately intervene again in a subdocket
related to a compliance filing if you have previously intervened in the
same docket. Protests will be considered by the Commission in
determining the appropriate action to be taken, but will not serve to
make protestants parties to the proceeding. Anyone filing a motion to
intervene or protest must serve a copy of that document on the
Applicant. In reference to filings initiating a new proceeding,
interventions or protests submitted on or before the comment deadline
need not be served on persons other than the Applicant.
    As it relates to any qualifying facility filings, the notices of
self-certification [or self-recertification] listed above, do not
institute a proceeding regarding qualifying facility status. A notice
of self-certification [or self-recertification] simply provides
notification that the entity making the filing has determined the
facility named in the notice meets the applicable criteria to be a
qualifying facility. Intervention and/or protest do

not lie in dockets that are qualifying facility self-certifications or
self-recertifications. Any person seeking to challenge such qualifying
facility status may do so by filing a motion pursuant to 18 CFR
292.207(d)(iii). Intervention and protests may be filed in response to
notices of qualifying facility dockets other than self-certifications
and self-recertifications.
    The Commission encourages electronic submission of protests and
interventions in lieu of paper, using the FERC Online links at http://
www.ferc.gov. To facilitate electronic service, persons with Internet
access who will eFile a document and/or be listed as a contact for an
intervenor must create and validate an eRegistration account using the
eRegistration link. Select the eFiling link to log on and submit the
intervention or protests.
    Persons unable to file electronically should submit an original and
14 copies of the intervention or protest to the Federal Energy
Regulatory Commission, 888 First St., NE., Washington, DC 20426.
    The filings in the above proceedings are accessible in the
Commission's eLibrary system by clicking on the appropriate link in the
above list. They are also available for review in the Commission's
Public Reference Room in Washington, DC. There is an eSubscription link
on the Web site that enables subscribers to receive e-mail notification
when a document is added to a subscribed docket(s). For assistance with
any FERC Online service, please e-mail<EMAIL_ADDRESS>or
call<PHONE_NUMBER> (toll free). For TTY, call<PHONE_NUMBER>.

Nathaniel J. Davis, Sr.,
Deputy Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2010-25059 Filed 10-5-10; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6717-01-P


(4) If EPA determines that the public health, interest, or welfare
warrants immediate action to suspend the accreditation of any training
program prior to the opportunity for a hearing, it shall:
    (i) Notify the affected entity of its intent to immediately suspend
training program accreditation for the reasons listed in paragraph
(g)(1) of this section. If a suspension, revocation, or modification
notice has not previously been issued pursuant to paragraph (g)(1) of
this section, it shall be issued at the same time the emergency
suspension notice is issued.
    (ii) Notify the affected entity in writing of the grounds for the
immediate suspension and why it is necessary to suspend the entity's
accreditation before an opportunity for a suspension, revocation or
modification hearing.
    (iii) Notify the affected entity of the anticipated commencement
date and duration of the immediate suspension.
    (iv) Notify the affected entity of its right to request a hearing
on the immediate suspension within 15 days of the suspension taking
place and the procedures for the conduct of such a hearing.
    (5) Any notice, decision, or order issued by EPA under this
section, any transcripts or other verbatim record of oral testimony,
and any documents filed by an accredited training program in a hearing
under this section shall be available to the public, except as
otherwise provided by section 14 of TSCA or by 40 CFR part 2. Any such
hearing at which oral testimony is presented shall be open to the
public, except that the Presiding Officer may exclude the public to the
extent necessary to allow presentation of information which may be
entitled to confidential treatment under section 14 of TSCA or 40 CFR
part 2.
    (6) The public shall be notified of the suspension, revocation,
modification or reinstatement of a training program's accreditation
through appropriate mechanisms.

    (7) EPA shall maintain a list of parties whose accreditation has
been suspended, revoked, modified or reinstated.
    (i) Training program recordkeeping requirements. (1) Accredited
training programs shall maintain, and make available to EPA, upon
request, the following records:
    (i) All documents specified in paragraph (c)(4) of this section
that demonstrate the qualifications listed in paragraphs (c)(1) and
(c)(2) of this section of the training manager and principal
instructors.
    (ii) Current curriculum/course materials and documents reflecting
any changes made to these materials.
    (iii) The course test blueprint.
    (iv) Information regarding how the hands-on assessment is conducted
including, but not limited to:
    (A) Who conducts the assessment.
    (B) How the skills are graded.
    (C) What facilities are used.
    (D) The pass/fail rate.
    (v) The quality control plan as described in paragraph (c)(9) of
this section.
    (vi) Results of the students' hands-on skills assessments and
course tests, and a record of each student's course completion
certificate.
    (vii) Any other material not listed above in paragraphs (i)(1)(i)
through (i)(1)(vi) of this section that was submitted to EPA as part of
the program's application for accreditation.
    (viii) For renovator refresher and dust sampling technician
refresher courses, a copy of each trainee's prior course completion
certificate showing that each trainee was eligible to take the
refresher course.
    (ix) For course modules delivered in an electronic format, a record
of each student's log-ins, launches, progress, and completion, and a
copy of the electronic learning completion certificate for each
student.
    (2) The training program must retain records pertaining to lead-
based paint activities courses at the address specified on the training
program accreditation application (or as modified in accordance with
paragraph (i)(3) of this section) for a minimum of 3 years and 6
months. Records pertaining to renovator or dust sampling technician
courses must be retained at the address specified on the training
program accreditation application (or as modified in accordance with
paragraph (i)(3) of this section) for a minimum of 5 years.
    (3) The training program shall notify EPA in writing within 30 days
of changing the address specified on its training program accreditation
application or transferring the records from that address.
    (j) Amendment of accreditation. (1) A training program must amend
its accreditation within 90 days of the date a change occurs to
information included in the program's most recent application. If the
training program fails to amend its accreditation within 90 days of the
date the change occurs, the program may not provide renovator, dust
sampling technician, or lead-based paint activities training until its
accreditation is amended.
    (2) To amend an accreditation, a training program must submit a
completed ``Accreditation Application for Training Providers,'' signed
by an authorized agent of the training provider, noting on the form
that it is submitted as an amendment and indicating the information
that has changed.
    (3) If the amendment includes a new training program manager, any
new or additional principal instructor(s), or any new permanent
training location(s), the training provider is not permitted to provide
training under the new training manager or offer courses taught by any
new principal instructor(s) or at the new training location(s) until
EPA either approves the amendment or 30 days have elapsed, whichever
occurs earlier.
    9. In Sec.  745.238, add paragraph (c)(5) to read as follows:

Sec.  745.238  Fees for accreditation and certification of lead-based
paint activities.

* * * * *
    (c) * * *
    (5) No fee will be charged for accreditation amendments.
* * * * *
    10. In Sec.  745.326, revise paragraphs (a)(2)(i), (a)(2)(ii), (d),
(e)(1), and (e)(3), and add paragraph (f) to read as follows:

Sec.  745.326  Renovation: State and Tribal program requirements.

    (a) * * *
    (2) * * *
    (i) Procedures and requirements for the accreditation of renovation
and dust sampling technician training programs. (Note: a State and
Tribal program is not required to include procedures and requirements
for the dust sampling technician training discipline if the State or
Tribal program requires dust sampling to be performed by a certified
lead-based paint inspector or risk assessor.)
    (ii) Procedures and requirements for accredited initial and
refresher training for renovators and dust sampling technicians and on-
the-job training for other individuals who perform renovations.
* * * * *
    (d) Certification of individuals and/or renovation firms. To be
considered at least as protective as the Federal program, the State or
Tribal program must:
    (1) Establish procedures and requirements that ensure that
individuals who perform or direct renovations are properly trained.
These procedures and requirements must include:
    (i) A requirement that renovations be performed and directed by at
least one individual who has been trained by an accredited training
program.
    (ii) Procedures and requirements for accredited refresher training
for these individuals.
    (iii) Procedures and requirements for certified renovators to
provide on-the-job training for those individuals who perform
renovations but do not receive accredited training.
    (2) Establish procedures and requirements for the formal
certification and re-certification of either individuals or renovation
firms.
    (3) Establish procedures for the suspension, revocation, or
modification of certifications.
    (e) * * *
    (1) Renovations must be conducted only by certified individuals
and/or certified renovation firms.
* * * * *
    (3) Certified individuals and/or renovation firms must retain
appropriate records.
    (f) Revisions to renovation program requirements. If EPA revises
the renovation program requirements contained in subparts E and L of
this part:
    (1) A State or Tribe with a renovation program approved before the
effective date of the revisions must demonstrate that it meets the
requirements of this section no later than the first report that it
submits pursuant to Sec.  745.324(h) no later than one year after the
effective date of the revisions.
    (2) A State or Tribe with an application for approval of a
renovation program submitted but not approved before the effective date
of the revisions must demonstrate that it meets the requirements of
this section either by amending its application or in the first report
that it submits pursuant to Sec.  745.324(h) no later than one year
after the effective date of the revisions.
    (3) A State or Indian Tribe submitting its application for approval
of a renovation program on or after the effective date of the revisions
must

demonstrate in its application that it meets the requirements of this
section.
    11. In Sec.  745.327, revise paragraphs (b)(1), (b)(2), (b)(3), and
(c)(2) to read as follows:

Sec.  745.327  State or Indian Tribal lead-based paint compliance and
enforcement programs.

* * * * *
    (b) * * *
    (1) Lead-based paint activities or renovation requirements. State
or Tribal lead-based paint compliance and enforcement programs will be
considered adequate if the State or Indian Tribe demonstrates, in its
application at Sec.  745.324(b)(2), that it has established a lead-
based paint program that contains all of the elements specified in
Sec.  745.325 or Sec.  745.326, or both, as applicable.
    (2) Authority to enter. State or Tribal officials must be able to
enter, through consent, warrant, or other authority, premises or
facilities where lead-based paint violations may occur for purposes of
conducting inspections.
    (i) State or Tribal officials must be able to enter premises or
facilities where those engaged in training for lead-based paint
activities or renovations conduct business.
    (ii) For the purposes of enforcing a renovation program, State or
Tribal officials must be able to enter a firm's place of business or
work site.
    (iii) State or Tribal officials must have authority to take samples
and review records as part of the lead-based paint inspection process.
    (3) Flexible remedies. A State or Tribal lead-based paint
compliance and enforcement program must provide for a diverse and
flexible array of enforcement statutory and regulatory authorities and
remedies. At a minimum, these authorities and remedies, which must also
be reflected in an enforcement response policy, must include the
following:
    (i) The authority to issue warning letters, Notices of
Noncompliance, Notices of Violation, or the equivalent;
    (ii) The authority to assess administrative or civil fines,
including a maximum penalty authority for any violation in an amount no
less than $10,000 per violation per day;
    (iii) The authority to assess the maximum penalties or fines for
each instance of violation and, if the violation is continuous, the
authority to assess penalties or fines up to the maximum amount for
each day of violation, with all penalties assessed or collected being
appropriate for the violation after consideration of the size or
viability of the business, enforcement history, risks to human health
or the environment posed by the violation, and other similar factors;
    (iv) The authority to commence an administrative proceeding or to
sue in courts of competent jurisdiction to recover penalties;
    (v) The authority to suspend, revoke, or modify the accreditation
of any training provider or the certification of any individual or
firm;
    (vi) The authority to commence an administrative proceeding or to
sue in courts of competent jurisdiction to enjoin any threatened or
continuing violation of any program requirement, without the necessity
of a prior suspension or revocation of a trainer's accreditation or a
firm's or individual's certification;
    (vii) The authority to apply criminal sanctions, including
recovering fines; and
    (viii) The authority to enforce its authorized program using a
burden of proof standard, including the degree of knowledge or intent
of the respondent that is no greater than it is for EPA under TSCA.
* * * * *
    (c) * * *
    (2) Compliance assistance. A State or Tribal lead-based paint
compliance and enforcement program must provide compliance assistance
to the public and the regulated community to facilitate awareness and
understanding of and compliance with State or Tribal requirements
governing the conduct of lead-based paint activities or renovations.
The type and nature of this assistance can be defined by the State or
Indian Tribe to achieve this goal.
* * * * *
[FR Doc. 2010-10102 Filed 5-5-10; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6560-50-P


[Federal Register Volume 77, Number 231 (Friday, November 30, 2012)]
[Notices]
[Page 71419]
[FR Doc No: 2012-29006]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY

[ER-FRL-9006-3]

Environmental Impacts Statements; Notice of Availability

    Responsible Agency: Office of Federal Activities, General
Information<PHONE_NUMBER> or http://www.epa.gov/compliance/nepa/.

Weekly receipt of Environmental Impact Statements
Filed 11/19/2012 Through 11/23/2012
Pursuant to 40 CFR 1506.9.

Notice

    Section 309(a) of the Clean Air Act requires that EPA make public
its comments on EISs issued by other Federal agencies. EPA's comment
letters on EISs are available at: http://www.epa.gov/compliance/nepa/eisdata.html.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: As of October 1, 2012, EPA will not accept
paper copies or CDs of EISs for filing purposes; all submissions on or
after October 1, 2012 must be made through e-NEPA. While this system
eliminates the need to submit paper or CD copies to EPA to meet filing
requirements, electronic submission does not change requirements for
distribution of EISs for public review and comment. To begin using e-
NEPA, you must first register with EPA's electronic reporting site--
https://cdx.epa.gov/epa_home.asp.

EIS No. 20120371, Final Supplement, USFS, MT, Beaverhead-Deerlodge
National Forest Land and Resource Management Plan, To Comply with the
District of Montana Court Order, Beaverhead and Jefferson Counties, MT,
Contact: Peri Suenram<PHONE_NUMBER> Due to an oversight, the above
document should have appeared in the 11/23/2012 FR Notice.
EIS No. 20120372, Final EIS, FAA, 00, Adoption--Programmatic-
Constellation Program, Development of Flight Systems and Earth-based
Ground Infrastructure for Future Missions, Brevard and Volusia
Counties, FL; Hancock County, MS; Orlean Parish, LA; Harris County, TX;
Madison County, AL; Cuyahoga and Erie Counties, OH; Hampton, VA; Santa
Clara County, CA; Dona Ana and Otero Counties, NM; and Box Elder and
Davis Counties, UT, Review Period Ends: 12/31/2012, Contact: Daniel
Czelusniak<PHONE_NUMBER>.

    The U.S. Department of Transportation's Federal Aviation
Administration has adopted the National Aeronautics and Space
Administration's (NASA) final EIS filed 01/09/2008.
    The NASA was not a cooperating agency for the above final EIS.
Recirculation of the document is necessary under Section 1506.3(b) of
the Council on Environmental Quality Regulations.

EIS No. 20120373, Draft EIS, BLM, WY, Continental Divide-Creston
Natural Gas Development Project, Carbon and Sweetwater Counties, WY,
Comment Period Ends: 01/14/2013, Contact: Dennis Carpenter 307-328-
4200.

Amended Notices

EIS No. 20120365, Final EIS, USACE, CA, Withdrawn--Pier S Marine
Terminal Development and Back Channel Improvements, Los Angeles County,
CA, Review Period Ends: 12/17/2012, Contact: John W. Markham 805-585-
2150 Revision to FR Published 11/16/2012; Officially Withdrawn by the
preparing agency.

    Dated: November 27, 2012.
Cliff Rader,
Director, NEPA Compliance Division, Office of Federal Activities.
[FR Doc. 2012-29006 Filed 11-29-12; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6560-50-P


[Federal Register: May 10, 2010 (Volume 75, Number 89)]
[Notices]
[Page 25851-25852]
[DOCID:fr10my10-44]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY

[EPA-HQ-OECA-2009-0405; FRL-9149-1]

Agency Information Collection Activities; Submission to OMB for
Review and Approval; Comment Request; NESHAP for Miscellaneous Coating
Manufacturing (Renewal), EPA ICR Number 2115.03, OMB Control Number
2060-0535

AGENCY: Environmental Protection Agency (EPA).

ACTION: Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: In compliance with the Paperwork Reduction Act (44 U.S.C. 3501
et seq.), this document announces that an Information Collection
Request (ICR) has been forwarded to the Office of Management and Budget
(OMB) for review and approval. This is a request to renew an existing
approved collection. The ICR which is abstracted below describes the
nature of the collection and the estimated burden and cost.

DATES: Additional comments may be submitted on or before June 9, 2010.

ADDRESSES: Submit your comments, referencing docket ID number EPA-HQ-
OECA-2009-0405, to (1) EPA online using http://www.regulations.gov (our
preferred method), or by e-mail to<EMAIL_ADDRESS>or by mail to:
EPA Docket Center (EPA/DC), Environmental Protection Agency,
Enforcement and Compliance Docket and Information Center, mail code
28221T, 1200 Pennsylvania Avenue, NW., Washington, DC 20460, and (2)
OMB at: Office of Information and Regulatory Affairs, Office of
Management and Budget (OMB), Attention: Desk Officer for EPA, 725 17th
Street, NW., Washington, DC 20503.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Robert C. Marshall, Jr., Office of
Compliance, Mail Code: 2223A, Environmental Protection Agency, 1200
Pennsylvania Avenue, NW., Washington, DC 20460; telephone number (202)
564-7021; fax number:<PHONE_NUMBER>; e-mail address:
<EMAIL_ADDRESS>
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: EPA has submitted the following ICR to OMB
for review and approval according to the procedures prescribed in 5 CFR
1320.12. On July 8, 2009 (74 FR 32581), EPA sought comments on this ICR
pursuant to 5 CFR 1320.8(d). EPA received no comments. Any additional
comments on this ICR should be submitted to EPA and OMB within 30 days
of this notice.
    EPA has established a public docket for this ICR under docket ID
number EPA-HQ-OECA-2009-0405, which is available for public viewing
online at http://www.regulations.gov, in person viewing at the
Enforcement and Compliance Docket in the EPA Docket Center (EPA/DC),
EPA West, Room 3334, 1301 Constitution Avenue, NW., Washington, DC. The
EPA Docket Center Public Reading Room is open from 8:30 a.m. to 4:30
p.m., Monday through Friday, excluding legal holidays. The telephone
number for the Reading Room is<PHONE_NUMBER>, and the telephone number
for the Enforcement and Compliance Docket is<PHONE_NUMBER>.
    Use EPA's electronic docket and comment system at http://
www.regulations.gov, to submit or view public comments, access the
index listing of the contents of the docket, and to access those
documents in the docket that are available electronically. Once in the
system, select ``docket search,'' then key in the docket ID number
identified above. Please note that EPA's policy is that public
comments, whether submitted electronically or on paper, will be made
available for public viewing at http://www.regulations.gov, as EPA
receives them and without change, unless the comment contains
copyrighted material, Confidential Business Information (CBI), or other
information whose public disclosure is restricted by statute. For
further information about the electronic docket, go to http://
www.regulations.gov.
    Title: NESHAP for Miscellaneous Coating Manufacturing (Renewal)
    ICR Numbers: EPA ICR Number 2115.03, OMB Control Number 2060-0535.
    ICR Status: This ICR is scheduled to expire on June 30, 2010. Under
OMB regulations, the Agency may continue to conduct or sponsor the
collection of information while this submission is pending at OMB. An
agency may not conduct or sponsor, and a person is not required to
respond to, a collection of information unless it displays a currently
valid OMB control number. The OMB control numbers for EPA's regulations
in title 40 of the CFR, after appearing in the Federal Register when
approved, are listed in 40 CFR part 9, and displayed either by
publication in the Federal Register or by other appropriate means, such
as on the related collection instrument or form, if applicable. The
display of OMB control numbers in certain EPA regulations is
consolidated in 40 CFR part 9.
    Abstract: Respondents are owners and operators of miscellaneous
coating manufacturing operations. Respondents must submit notifications
and reports and maintain records required by the

General Provisions (40 CFR part 63, subpart A). Recordkeeping of
parameters related to air pollution control technologies is required.
The reports and records will be used to demonstrate compliance with the
emission limitations and work practice standards.
    Burden Statement: The annual public reporting and recordkeeping
burden for this collection of information is estimated to average 296
hours per response. Burden means the total time, effort, or financial
resources expended by persons to generate, maintain, retain, or
disclose or provide information to or for a Federal agency. This
includes the time needed to review instructions; develop, acquire,
install, and utilize technology and systems for the purposes of
collecting, validating, and verifying information, processing and
maintaining information, and disclosing and providing information;
adjust the existing ways to comply with any previously applicable
instructions and requirements which have subsequently changed; train
personnel to be able to respond to a collection of information; search
data sources; complete and review the collection of information; and
transmit or otherwise disclose the information.
    Respondents/Affected Entities: Miscellaneous coating manufacturing
facilities.
    Estimated Number of Respondents: 133.
    Frequency of Response: Initially, occasionally, semiannually and
annually.
    Estimated Total Annual Hour Burden: 167,572.
    Estimated Total Annual Cost: $17,007,914, which includes
$14,192,714 in labor costs, $30,000 in capital/startup costs, and
$2,785,200 in operation and maintenance (O&M) costs.
    Changes in the Estimates: There is no change in the calculation
methodology for labor hours or costs to the respondents in this ICR
compared to the previous ICR. This is due to two considerations: (1)
The regulations have not changed over the past three years and are not
anticipated to change over the next three years; and (2) the growth
rate for respondents is very low, negative, or non-existent. Therefore,
the labor hours and cost figures in the previous ICR reflect the
current burden to the respondents and are reiterated in this ICR.
    In the previous ICR renewal, the approved annual hour burden was
167,832 hours. The actual annual hour burden as calculated in the
previous ICR was 167,572 hours. By this ICR, the Agency is requesting
approval of 167,572 hours.

    Dated: May 3, 2010.
John Moses, Director,
Collection Strategies Division.
[FR Doc. 2010-10994 Filed 5-7-10; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6560-50-P


[Federal Register Volume 79, Number 114 (Friday, June 13, 2014)]
[Notices]
[Pages 33942-33943]
[FR Doc No: 2014-13882]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY

Federal Emergency Management Agency

[Internal Agency Docket No. FEMA-4175-DR; Docket ID FEMA-2014-0003]

Mississippi; Major Disaster and Related Determinations

AGENCY: Federal Emergency Management Agency, DHS.

ACTION: Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: This is a notice of the Presidential declaration of a major
disaster for the State of Mississippi (FEMA-4175-DR), dated April 30,
2014, and related determinations.

DATES: Effective April 30, 2014.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Dean Webster, Office of Response and
Recovery, Federal Emergency Management Agency, 500 C Street SW.,
Washington, DC 20472,<PHONE_NUMBER>.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Notice is hereby given that, in a letter
dated April 30, 2014, the President issued a major disaster declaration
under the authority of the Robert T. Stafford Disaster Relief and
Emergency Assistance Act, 42 U.S.C. 5121 et seq. (the ``Stafford
Act''), as follows:

    I have determined that the damage in certain areas of the State
of Mississippi resulting from severe storms, tornadoes, and flooding
beginning on April 28, 2014, and continuing, is of sufficient
severity and magnitude to warrant a major disaster declaration under
the Robert T. Stafford Disaster Relief and Emergency Assistance Act,
42 U.S.C. 5121 et seq. (the ``Stafford Act''). Therefore, I declare
that such a major disaster exists in the State of Mississippi.
    In order to provide Federal assistance, you are hereby
authorized to allocate from funds

available for these purposes such amounts as you find necessary for
Federal disaster assistance and administrative expenses.
    You are authorized to provide Individual Assistance and
assistance for debris removal and emergency protective measures
(Categories A and B) under the Public Assistance program in the
designated areas, Hazard Mitigation throughout the State, and any
other forms of assistance under the Stafford Act that you deem
appropriate subject to completion of Preliminary Damage Assessments.
Direct Federal assistance is authorized.
    Consistent with the requirement that Federal assistance be
supplemental, any Federal funds provided under the Stafford Act for
Hazard Mitigation and Other Needs Assistance will be limited to 75
percent of the total eligible costs. Federal funds provided under
the Stafford Act for Public Assistance also will be limited to 75
percent of the total eligible costs, with the exception of projects
that meet the eligibility criteria for a higher Federal cost-sharing
percentage under the Public Assistance Alternative Procedures Pilot
Program for Debris Removal implemented pursuant to section 428 of
the Stafford Act.
    Further, you are authorized to make changes to this declaration
for the approved assistance to the extent allowable under the
Stafford Act.

    The time period prescribed for the implementation of section
310(a), Priority to Certain Applications for Public Facility and Public
Housing Assistance, 42 U.S.C. 5153, shall be for a period not to exceed
six months after the date of this declaration.
    The Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA) hereby gives notice
that pursuant to the authority vested in the Administrator, under
Executive Order 12148, as amended, Mark H. Landry, of FEMA is appointed
to act as the Federal Coordinating Officer for this major disaster.
    The following areas of the State of Mississippi have been
designated as adversely affected by this major disaster:

    Itawamba, Lee, Lowndes, Madison, Rankin, Wayne, and Winston
Counties for Individual Assistance.
    Itawamba, Lee, Lowndes, Madison, Rankin, Wayne, and Winston
Counties for debris removal and emergency protective measures
(Categories A and B), including direct federal assistance, under the
Public Assistance program.
    All counties within the State of Mississippi are eligible to
apply for assistance under the Hazard Mitigation Grant Program.
    The following Catalog of Federal Domestic Assistance Numbers
(CFDA) are to be used for reporting and drawing funds: 97.030,
Community Disaster Loans; 97.031, Cora Brown Fund; 97.032, Crisis
Counseling; 97.033, Disaster Legal Services; 97.034, Disaster
Unemployment Assistance (DUA); 97.046, Fire Management Assistance
Grant; 97.048, Disaster Housing Assistance to Individuals and
Households in Presidentially Declared Disaster Areas; 97.049,
Presidentially Declared Disaster Assistance--Disaster Housing
Operations for Individuals and Households; 97.050, Presidentially
Declared Disaster Assistance to Individuals and Households--Other
Needs; 97.036, Disaster Grants--Public Assistance (Presidentially
Declared Disasters); 97.039, Hazard Mitigation Grant.

W. Craig Fugate,
Administrator, Federal Emergency Management Agency.
[FR Doc. 2014-13882 Filed 6-12-14; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 9111-23-P


[Federal Register: December 29, 2009 (Volume 74, Number 248)]
[Notices]
[Page 68842]
[DOCID:fr29de09-84]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission

[Docket No. ER09-1048-000; Docket No.; ER09-1049-000; Docket Nos. ER09-
1050-000; ER09-1192-000; Docket No. ER09-1051-000; Docket No. ER09-
1063-000; Docket No. ER09-1142-000]

California Independent System Operator Corporation; Midwest
Independent Transmission System Operator, Inc.; Southwest Power Pool,
Inc.; ISO New England, Inc. and New England Power Pool; PJM
Interconnection, LLC; New York Independent System Operator, Inc. Notice
of Date of Technical Conference on RTO/ISO Responsiveness

December 18, 2009.
    On November 13, 2009, the Commission issued a notice announcing
that the Commission staff would hold a technical conference in the near
future to address issues raised in the above-referenced Order No. 719
compliance proceedings.\1\ The purpose of this notice is to announce
that the technical conference will be held on Thursday, February 4,
2010, from 12:30 p.m. to 4:30 p.m. (EST) in the Commission Meeting Room
at the Commission's Washington, DC headquarters, 888 First Street, NE.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \1\ Wholesale Competition in Regions with Organized Electric
Market, Order No. 719, 73 FR 64,100 (Oct. 28, 2008), FERC Stats &
Regs. ] 31,281 (2008); order onreh'g, 74 FR 37,772 (July 29, 2009),
128 FERC ] 61,059 (2009) (Order No. 719-A).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    The agenda will be provided in a subsequent notice. This conference
will be webcast. All interested parties are invited, and there is no
registration fee to attend.
    FERC conferences are accessible under section 508 of the
Rehabilitation Act of 1973. For accessibility accommodations please
send an email to<EMAIL_ADDRESS>or call toll free (866) 208-
3372 (voice) or<PHONE_NUMBER> (TTY), or send a fax to<PHONE_NUMBER>
with the required accommodations.
    Questions about the technical conference may be directed to Kurt
Longo at<EMAIL_ADDRESS>(202) 502-8048.

Nathaniel J. Davis, Sr.,
Deputy Secretary.
[FR Doc. E9-30806 Filed 12-28-09; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 6717-01-P


[Federal Register Volume 79, Number 155 (Tuesday, August 12, 2014)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Pages 46968-46971]
[FR Doc No: 2014-18866]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION

Federal Aviation Administration

14 CFR Part 39

[Docket No. FAA-2014-0490; Directorate Identifier 2014-NM-133-AD;
Amendment 39-17926; AD 2014-16-02]
RIN 2120-AA64

Airworthiness Directives; Bombardier, Inc. Airplanes

AGENCY: Federal Aviation Administration (FAA), Department of
Transportation (DOT).

ACTION: Final rule; request for comments.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: We are adopting a new airworthiness directive (AD) for certain
Bombardier, Inc. Model CL-600-1A11 (CL-600) airplanes. This AD requires
revising the airplane flight manual to prohibit thrust reverser
operation, and repetitive detailed inspections of both engine thrust
reversers for cracks and modification if necessary. The modification of
the thrust reversers is also an optional terminating action for the
repetitive inspections. This AD was prompted by reports of partial
deployment of an engine thrust reverser in-flight caused by a failure
of the translating sleeve at the thrust reverser attachment points. We
are issuing this AD to detect and correct cracks of the translating
sleeve at the thrust reverser actuator attachment points, which could
result in deployment or dislodgement of an engine thrust reverser in-
flight and subsequent reduced control of the airplane.

DATES: This AD becomes effective August 12, 2014.
    The Director of the Federal Register approved the incorporation by
reference of certain publications listed in this AD as of August 12,
2014.
    We must receive comments on this AD by September 26, 2014.

ADDRESSES: You may send comments, using the procedures found in 14 CFR
11.43 and 11.45, by any of the following methods:
     Federal eRulemaking Portal: Go to http://www.regulations.gov. Follow the instructions for submitting comments.
     Fax:<PHONE_NUMBER>.
     Mail: U.S. Department of Transportation, Docket
Operations, M-30, West Building Ground Floor, Room W12-140, 1200 New
Jersey Avenue SE., Washington, DC 20590.
     Hand Delivery: U.S. Department of Transportation, Docket
Operations, M-30, West Building Ground Floor, Room W12-140, 1200 New
Jersey Avenue SE., Washington, DC, between 9 a.m. and 5 p.m., Monday
through Friday, except Federal holidays.
    For service information identified in this AD, contact Bombardier,
Inc., 400 Cote-Vertu Road West, Dorval, Qu[eacute]bec H4S 1Y9, Canada;
telephone<PHONE_NUMBER>; fax<PHONE_NUMBER>; email
<EMAIL_ADDRESS>Internet http://www.bombardier.com. You
may view this referenced service information at the FAA, Transport
Airplane Directorate, 1601 Lind Avenue SW., Renton, WA. For information
on the availability of this material at the FAA, call<PHONE_NUMBER>.

Examining the AD Docket

    You may examine the AD docket on the Internet at http://www.regulations.gov by searching for and locating Docket No. FAA-2014-
0490; or in person at the Docket Operations office between 9 a.m. and 5
p.m., Monday through Friday, except Federal holidays. The AD docket
contains this AD, the regulatory evaluation, any comments received, and
other information. The street address for the Docket Operations office
(telephone<PHONE_NUMBER>) is in the ADDRESSES section. Comments will be
available in the AD docket shortly after receipt.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Fabio Buttitta, Aerospace Engineer,
Airframe and Mechanical Systems Branch, ANE-171, FAA, New York Aircraft
Certification Office (ACO), 1600 Stewart Avenue, Suite 410, Westbury,
NY 11590; telephone<PHONE_NUMBER>; fax<PHONE_NUMBER>.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

Discussion

    Transport Canada Civil Aviation (TCCA), which is the aviation
authority for Canada, has issued Canadian Emergency Airworthiness
Directive CF-2014-19, dated June 20, 2014 (referred to after this as
the Mandatory Continuing Airworthiness Information, or ``the MCAI''),
to correct an unsafe condition for certain Bombardier, Inc. Model CL-
600-1A11 (CL-600) airplanes. The MCAI states:

There have been two reported incidents of partial deployment of an
engine thrust reverser in-flight, caused by a failure of the
translating sleeve at the thrust reverser actuator attachment
points. Inspection of the same area on some other thrust reversers
revealed cracks emanating from the holes under the nut plates.
    In both incidents, the affected aeroplane landed safely without
any noticeable controllability issues, however structural failure of
thrust reverser actuator attachment points resulting in thrust
reverser deployment or dislodgment in flight [and subsequent reduced
control of the airplane] is a safety hazard warranting an immediate
mitigating action.
    To help in mitigating any immediate safety hazard, Bombardier
Inc. has revised the Aircraft Flight Manual (AFM) through Temporary
Revisions (TR) 600/29, 600/30, 600-1/24 and 600-1/26, to prohibit
the thrust reverser operation on affected aeroplanes. Additionally,
as an interim corrective action, Bombardier Inc. has issued alert
service bulletin (ASB) A600-0769 requiring an inspection and/or a
mechanical lock out of the thrust reverser to prevent it from moving
out of forward thrust mode.
    This [Canadian] AD is issued to mandate the incorporation of
revised AFM procedures per TR 600/29, 600/30, 600-1/24 and 600-1/26
and compliance with ASB A600-0769 for all affected CL-600-1A11
aeroplanes.

Required actions also include repetitive detailed inspections
(including a borescope inspection) of both engine thrust reversers for
cracks, and modifying the thrust reversers if necessary. Modifying the
thrust reversers terminates the detailed inspections. You may examine
the MCAI on the Internet at http://www.regulations.gov by searching for
and locating Docket No. FAA-2014-0490.

Relevant Service Information

    Bombardier, Inc. has issued the following service information. The
actions described in this service information are intended to correct
the unsafe condition identified in the MCAI.
     Bombardier Alert Service Bulletin A600-0769, Revision 01,
dated June 26, 2014.
     Canadair Temporary Revision (TR) 600/29, dated June 20,
2014, to the Canadair CL-600-1A11 Airplane Flight Manual (AFM).
     Canadair TR 600/30, dated June 6, 2014, to the Canadair
CL-600-1A11 AFM.
     Canadair TR 600-1/24, dated June 20, 2014, to the Canadair
CL-600-1A11 AFM (Winglets) including Erratum, Publication No. PSP 600-
1AFM (US), TR No. 600-1/24, June 20, 2014.
     Canadair TR 600-1/26, dated June 6, 2014, to the Canadair
CL-600-1A11 AFM (Winglets).

FAA's Determination and Requirements of This AD

    This product has been approved by the aviation authority of another
country, and is approved for operation in the United States. Pursuant
to our bilateral agreement with the State of Design Authority, we have
been notified of the unsafe condition described in the MCAI and service
information referenced above. We are issuing this AD because we
evaluated all pertinent information and determined the unsafe condition
exists and is likely to exist or develop on other products of the same
type design.

``Contacting the Manufacturer'' Paragraph in This AD

    Since late 2006, we have included a standard paragraph titled
``Airworthy Product'' in all MCAI ADs in which the FAA develops an AD
based on a foreign authority's AD.
    The MCAI or referenced service information in an FAA AD often
directs the owner/operator to contact the manufacturer for corrective
actions, such as a repair. Briefly, the Airworthy Product paragraph
allowed owners/operators to use corrective actions provided by the
manufacturer if those actions were FAA-approved. In addition, the
paragraph stated that any actions approved by the State of Design
Authority (or its delegated agent) are considered to be FAA-approved.
    In an NPRM having Directorate Identifier 2012-NM-101-AD (78 FR
78285, December 26, 2013), we proposed to prevent the use of repairs
that were not specifically developed to correct the unsafe condition,
by requiring that the repair approval provided by the State of Design
Authority or its delegated agent specifically refer to the FAA AD. This
change was intended to clarify the method of compliance and to provide
operators with better visibility of repairs that are specifically
developed and approved to correct the unsafe condition. In addition, we
proposed to change the phrase ``its delegated agent'' to include a
design approval holder (DAH) with State of Design Authority design
organization approval (DOA), as applicable, to refer to a DAH
authorized to approve required repairs for the proposed AD.
    One commenter to the NPRM having Directorate Identifier 2012-NM-
101-AD (78 FR 78285, December 26, 2013) stated the following: ``The
proposed wording, being specific to repairs, eliminates the
interpretation that Airbus messages are acceptable for approving minor
deviations (corrective actions) needed during accomplishment of an AD
mandated Airbus service bulletin.''
    This comment has made the FAA aware that some operators have
misunderstood or misinterpreted the Airworthy Product paragraph to
allow the owner/operator to use messages provided by the manufacturer
as approval of deviations during the accomplishment of an AD-mandated
action. The Airworthy Product paragraph does not approve messages or
other information provided by the manufacturer for deviations to the
requirements of the AD-mandated actions. The Airworthy Product
paragraph only addresses the requirement to contact the manufacturer
for corrective actions for the identified unsafe condition and does not
cover deviations from other AD requirements. However, deviations to AD-
required actions are addressed in 14 CFR 39.17, and anyone may request
the approval for an alternative method of compliance to the AD-required
actions using the procedures found in 14 CFR 39.19.
    To address this misunderstanding and misinterpretation of the
Airworthy Product paragraph, we have changed the paragraph and retitled
it ``Contacting the Manufacturer.'' This paragraph now clarifies that
for any requirement in this AD to obtain corrective actions from a
manufacturer, the actions must be accomplished using a method approved
by the FAA, Transport Canada Civil Aviation (TCCA), or Bombardier's
TCCA Design Approval Organization (DAO).
    The Contacting the Manufacturer paragraph also clarifies that, if
approved by the DAO, the approval must include the DAO-authorized
signature. The DAO signature indicates that the data and information
contained in the document are TCCA-approved, which is also FAA-
approved. Messages and other information provided by the manufacturer
that do not contain the DAO-authorized signature approval are not TCCA-
approved, unless TCCA directly approves the manufacturer's message or
other information.
    This clarification does not remove flexibility previously afforded
by the Airworthy Product paragraph. Consistent with long-standing FAA
policy, such flexibility was never intended for required actions. This
is also consistent with the recommendation of the Airworthiness
Directive Implementation Aviation Rulemaking Committee to increase
flexibility in complying with ADs by identifying those actions in
manufacturers' service instructions that are ``Required for
Compliance'' with ADs. We continue to work with manufacturers to
implement this recommendation. But once we determine that an action is
required, any deviation from the requirement must be approved as an
alternative method of compliance.

Difference Between This AD and the MCAI or Service Information

    Part 3 of Canadian Emergency AD CF-2014-19, dated June 20, 2014,
which specifies accomplishing a repair or modification of the thrust
reversers, is not required in this AD. We are currently considering
requiring a repair or modification of the thrust reversers. However,
the planned compliance time for the action would allow enough time to
provide notice and opportunity for prior public comment on the merits
of the actions.

FAA's Determination of the Effective Date

    An unsafe condition exists that requires the immediate adoption of
this AD. The FAA has found that the risk to the flying public justifies
waiving notice and comment prior to adoption of this rule because
cracks of the translating sleeve at the thrust reverser actuator
attachment points could result in thrust reverser deployment or
dislodgement in-flight and subsequent reduced control of the airplane.
Therefore, we determined that notice and opportunity for public comment
before issuing this AD are impracticable and that good cause exists for
making this amendment effective in fewer than 30 days.

Comments Invited

    This AD is a final rule that involves requirements affecting flight
safety, and we did not precede it by notice and opportunity for public
comment. We invite you to send any written relevant data, views, or
arguments about this AD. Send your comments to an address listed under
the ADDRESSES section. Include ``Docket No. FAA-2014-0490; Directorate
Identifier 2014-NM-133-AD'' at the beginning of your comments. We
specifically invite comments on the overall regulatory, economic,
environmental, and energy aspects of this AD. We will consider all
comments received by the closing date and may amend this AD based on
those comments.
    We will post all comments we receive, without change, to http://www.regulations.gov, including any personal information you provide. We
will also post a report summarizing each substantive verbal contact we
receive about this AD.

Costs of Compliance

    We estimate that this AD affects 18 airplanes of U.S. registry.
    We also estimate that it will take about 29 work-hours per product
to comply with the basic requirements of this AD. The average labor
rate is $85 per work-hour. Based on these figures, we estimate the cost
of this AD on U.S. operators to be $44,370, or $2,465 per product.
    In addition, we estimate that any necessary follow-on actions will
take about 72 work-hours and require parts costing $509, for a cost of
$6,629 per product. We have no way of determining the number of
aircraft that might need this action.

Authority for This Rulemaking

    Title 49 of the United States Code specifies the FAA's authority to
issue rules on aviation safety. Subtitle I, section 106, describes the
authority of the FAA Administrator. ``Subtitle VII: Aviation
Programs,'' describes in more detail the scope of the Agency's
authority.
    We are issuing this rulemaking under the authority described in
``Subtitle VII, Part A, Subpart III, Section 44701: General
requirements.'' Under that section, Congress charges the FAA with
promoting safe flight of civil aircraft in air commerce by prescribing
regulations for practices, methods, and procedures the Administrator
finds necessary for safety in air commerce. This regulation is within
the scope of that authority because it addresses an unsafe condition
that is likely to exist or develop on products identified in this
rulemaking action.

Regulatory Findings

    We determined that this AD will not have federalism implications
under Executive Order 13132. This AD will not have a substantial direct
effect on the States, on the relationship between the national
government and the States, or on the distribution of power and
responsibilities among the various levels of government.
    For the reasons discussed above, I certify that this AD:
    1. Is not a ``significant regulatory action'' under Executive Order
12866;
    2. Is not a ``significant rule'' under the DOT Regulatory Policies
and Procedures (44 FR 11034, February 26, 1979);
    3. Will not affect intrastate aviation in Alaska; and
    4. Will not have a significant economic impact, positive or
negative, on a substantial number of small entities under the criteria
of the Regulatory Flexibility Act.

List of Subjects in 14 CFR Part 39

    Air transportation, Aircraft, Aviation safety, Incorporation by
reference, Safety.

Adoption of the Amendment

    Accordingly, under the authority delegated to me by the
Administrator, the FAA amends 14 CFR part 39 as follows:

PART 39--AIRWORTHINESS DIRECTIVES

0
1. The authority citation for part 39 continues to read as follows:

    Authority:  49 U.S.C. 106(g), 40113, 44701.

Sec.  39.13  [Amended]

0
2. The FAA amends Sec.  39.13 by adding the following new airworthiness
directive (AD):

2014-16-02 Bombardier, Inc.: Amendment 39-17926. Docket No. FAA-
2014-0490; Directorate Identifier 2014-NM-133-AD.

(a) Effective Date

    This AD becomes effective August 12, 2014.

(b) Affected ADs

    None.

(c) Applicability

    This AD applies to Bombardier, Inc. Model CL-600-1A11 (CL-600)
airplanes, certificated in any category, serial numbers 1004 through
1085.

(d) Subject

    Air Transport Association (ATA) of America Code 78, Engine
Exhaust.

(e) Reason

    This AD was prompted by reports of partial deployment of an
engine thrust reverser in-flight caused by a failure of the
translating sleeve at the thrust reverser attachment points. We are
issuing this AD to detect and correct cracks of the translating
sleeve at the thrust reverser actuator attachment points, which
could result in deployment or dislodgement of an engine thrust
reverser in-flight and subsequent reduced control of the airplane.

(f) Compliance

    Comply with this AD within the compliance times specified,
unless already done.

(g) Airplane Flight Manual (AFM) Revision

    Within 1 calendar day after the effective date of this AD:
Revise the applicable sections of the AFM to include the information
specified in the temporary revisions (TRs) identified in paragraphs
(g)(1), (g)(2), (g)(3), and (g)(4) of this AD, as applicable. These
TRs introduce procedures to prohibit thrust reverser operation.
Operate the airplane according to the limitations and procedures in
the TRs identified in paragraphs (g)(1), (g)(2), (g)(3), and (g)(4)
of this AD, as applicable. The revision required by paragraph (g) of
this AD may be done by inserting copies of the applicable TRs
identified in paragraphs (g)(1), (g)(2), (g)(3), and (g)(4) of this
AD into the AFM. When these TRs have been included in general
revisions of the AFM, the general revisions may be inserted in the
AFM, provided the relevant information in the general revision is
identical to that in the applicable TRs, and the TRs may be removed.
    (1) Canadair TR 600/29, dated June 20, 2014, to the Canadair CL-
600-1A11 AFM.
    (2) Canadair TR 600/30, dated June 6, 2014, to the Canadair CL-
600-1A11 AFM.
    (3) Canadair TR 600-1/24, dated June 20, 2014, to the Canadair
CL-600-1A11 AFM (Winglets) including Erratum, Publication No. PSP
600-1AFM (US), TR No. 600-1/24, June 20, 2014.
    (4) Canadair TR 600-1/26, dated June 6, 2014, to the Canadair
CL-600-1A11 AFM (Winglets).

(h) Repetitive Inspections

    Within 25 flight cycles or 90 days, whichever occurs first,
after the effective date of this AD, do detailed inspections
(including a borescope inspection) of both engine thrust reversers
for cracks, in accordance with the Accomplishment Instructions of
Bombardier Alert Service Bulletin A600-0769, Revision 01, dated June
26, 2014.
    (1) If no cracking is found during any inspection required by
paragraph (h) of this AD, repeat the inspection required by
paragraph (h) of this AD thereafter at intervals not to exceed 100
flight cycles until the modification specified in paragraph (i) of
this AD is done.
    (2) If any cracking is found during any inspection required by
paragraph (h) of this AD, before further flight, modify the thrust
reversers on both engines, in accordance with the Accomplishment
Instructions of Bombardier Alert Service Bulletin A600-0769,
Revision 01, dated June 26, 2014.

(i) Optional Terminating Modification

    Modifying the thrust reversers on both engines, in accordance
with the Accomplishment Instructions of Bombardier Alert Service
Bulletin A600-0769, Revision 01, dated June 26, 2014, terminates the
inspections required by paragraph (h) of this AD.

(j) Credit for Previous Actions

    This paragraph provides credit for actions required by
paragraphs (h) and (i) of this AD, if those actions were performed
before the effective date of this AD using Bombardier Alert Service
Bulletin A600-0769, dated June 19, 2014, which is not incorporated
by reference in this AD.

(k) Other FAA AD Provisions

    The following provisions also apply to this AD:
    (1) Alternative Methods of Compliance (AMOCs): The Manager, New
York Aircraft Certification Office (ACO), ANE-170, FAA, has the
authority to approve AMOCs for this AD, if requested using the
procedures found in 14 CFR 39.19. In accordance with 14 CFR 39.19,
send your request to your principal inspector or local Flight
Standards District Office, as appropriate. If sending information

directly to the ACO, send it to ATTN: Program Manager, Continuing
Operational Safety, FAA, New York ACO, 1600 Stewart Avenue, Suite
410, Westbury, NY 11590; telephone<PHONE_NUMBER>; fax<PHONE_NUMBER>.
Before using any approved AMOC, notify your appropriate principal
inspector, or lacking a principal inspector, the manager of the
local flight standards district office/certificate holding district
office. The AMOC approval letter must specifically reference this
AD.
    (2) Contacting the Manufacturer: For any requirement in this AD
to obtain corrective actions from a manufacturer, the action must be
accomplished using a method approved by the Manager, New York ACO,
ANE-170, Engine and Propeller Directorate, FAA; or Transport Canada
Civil Aviation (TCCA); or Bombardier, Inc.'s TCCA Design Approval
Organization (DAO). If approved by the DAO, the approval must
include the DAO-authorized signature.

(l) Related Information

    (1) Refer to Mandatory Continuing Airworthiness Information
(MCAI) Canadian Emergency Airworthiness Directive CF-2014-19, dated
June 20, 2014, for related information. You may examine the MCAI on
the Internet at http://www.regulations.gov by searching for and
locating Docket No. FAA-2014-0490.
    (2) Service information identified in this AD that is not
incorporated by reference may be obtained at the addresses specified
in paragraphs (m)(3) and (m)(4) of this AD.

(m) Material Incorporated by Reference

    (1) The Director of the Federal Register approved the
incorporation by reference (IBR) of the service information listed
in this paragraph under 5 U.S.C. 552(a) and 1 CFR part 51.
    (2) You must use this service information as applicable to do
the actions required by this AD, unless this AD specifies otherwise.
    (i) Bombardier Alert Service Bulletin A600-0769, Revision 01,
dated June 26, 2014.
    (ii) Canadair Temporary Revision 600/29, dated June 20, 2014, to
the Canadair CL-600-1A11 Airplane Flight Manual.
    (iii) Canadair Temporary Revision 600/30, dated June 6, 2014, to
the Canadair CL-600-1A11 Airplane Flight Manual.
    (iv) Canadair Temporary Revision 600-1/24, dated June 20, 2014,
to the Canadair CL-600-1A11 Airplane Flight Manual (Winglets)
including Erratum, Publication No. PSP 600-1AFM (US), TR No. 600-1/
24, June 20, 2014.
    (v) Canadair Temporary Revision 600-1/26, dated June 6, 2014, to
the Canadair CL-600-1A11 Airplane Flight Manual (Winglets).
    (3) For service information identified in this AD, contact
Bombardier, Inc., 400 C[ocirc]te-Vertu Road West, Dorval,
Qu[eacute]bec H4S 1Y9, Canada; telephone<PHONE_NUMBER>; fax 514-855-
7401; email<EMAIL_ADDRESS>Internet http://www.bombardier.com.
    (4) You may view this service information at the FAA, Transport
Airplane Directorate, 1601 Lind Avenue SW., Renton, WA. For
information on the availability of this material at the FAA, call
425-227-1221.
    (5) You may view this service information that is incorporated
by reference at the National Archives and Records Administration
(NARA). For information on the availability of this material at
NARA, call<PHONE_NUMBER>, or go to: http://www.archives.gov/federal-register/cfr/ibr-locations.html.

    Issued in Renton, Washington, on August 4, 2014.
Jeffrey E. Duven,
Manager, Transport Airplane Directorate, Aircraft Certification
Service.
[FR Doc. 2014-18866 Filed 8-11-14; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910-13-P


[Federal Register: April 10, 2009 (Volume 74, Number 68)]
[Notices]
[Page 16434-16435]
[DOCID:fr10ap09-116]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

[Release No. 34-59704; File No. SR-Phlx-2009-30]

Self-Regulatory Organizations; NASDAQ OMX PHLX, Inc.; Notice of
Filing and Immediate Effectiveness of Proposed Rule Change To Increase
the Options Transactions Charge for Customer Executions and To Remove
the Per Trade Per Side Fee Cap in U.S. Dollar-Settled Foreign Currency
Options

April 3, 2009.
    Pursuant to Section 19(b)(1) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934
(``Act''),\1\ and Rule 19b-4 thereunder,\2\ notice is hereby given that
on March 31, 2009, NASDAQ OMX PHLX, Inc. (``Phlx'' or ``Exchange'')
filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (``Commission'') the
proposed rule change as described in Items I, II, and III below, which
Items have been prepared by the Exchange. The Commission is publishing
this notice to solicit comments on the proposed rule change from
interested persons.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \1\ 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(1).
    \2\ 17 CFR 240.19b-4.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

I. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement of the Terms of Substance
of the Proposed Rule Change

    The Exchange proposes to increase the options transactions charge
for customer executions in U.S. Dollar-Settled Foreign Currency Options
from $.40 to $.44 and eliminate the $4,000 per trade per side cap
associated with this fee.
    While changes to the Exchange's fee schedule pursuant to this
proposal are effective upon filing, the Exchange has designated this
proposal to be effective for trades settling on or after April 1, 2009.
    The text of the proposed rule change is available on the Exchange's
Web site at http://nasdaqomxphlx.cchwallstreet.com/NASDAQOMXPHLX/
Filings/, at the principal office of the Exchange, and at the
Commission's Public Reference Room.

II. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement of the Purpose of, and
Statutory Basis for, the Proposed Rule Change

    In its filing with the Commission, the Exchange included statements
concerning the purpose of and basis for the proposed rule change and
discussed any comments it received on the proposed rule change. The
text of these statements may be examined at the places specified in
Item IV below. The Exchange has prepared summaries, set forth in
sections A, B, and C below, of the most significant aspects of such
statements.

A. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement of the Purpose of, and
Statutory Basis for, the Proposed Rule Change

1. Purpose
    The purpose of the proposed rule change is to increase the options
transaction charge for customer executions in U.S. Dollar-Settled
Foreign Currency Options to $.44 and remove the per trade per side cap
of $4,000. The Exchange believes that it can continue to attract this
business without offering the cap. Additionally, increasing the fee
should raise revenue.
    Currently the options transaction charge for customer executions in
U.S. Dollar-Settled Foreign Currency Options is $.40 and the Exchange
proposes to raise this fee to $.44.\3\ In addition to increasing the
options transaction charge fee, the Exchange proposes to remove a
$4,000 per trade per side cap related to U.S. Dollar-Settled Foreign
Currency Options for customer transactions. The cap currently prevents
additional option charges from being assessed on these types of
transactions beyond the $4,000 limit. The Exchange believes that the
additional order flow that resulted from the cap may continue to be
directed to the Exchange without the cap.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \3\ This fee is the same rate that is assessed on members for
customer executions in Index Options.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

2. Statutory Basis
    The Exchange believes that its proposal to amend its schedule of
fees is consistent with Section 6(b) of the Act \4\ in general, and
furthers the objectives of Section 6(b)(4) of the Act \5\ in
particular, in that it is an equitable allocation of reasonable fees
and other charges among Exchange members. The Exchange believes this
proposal is equitable because by removing the cap from the customer
execution option transaction charges, all trades will be similarly
assessed the option transaction charge regardless of the number of
trades at the increased rate of $.44. Additionally, the Exchange
believes that the fee is equitable in that it is equivalent to the rate
assessed on members for customer executions in Index Options.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \4\ 15 U.S.C. 78f(b).
    \5\ 15 U.S.C. 78f(b)(4).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

B. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement on Burden on Competition

    The Exchange does not believe that the proposed rule change will
impose any burden on competition not necessary or appropriate in
furtherance of the purposes of the Act.

C. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement on Comments on the Proposed
Rule Change Received From Members, Participants or Others

    No written comments were either solicited or received.

III. Date of Effectiveness of the Proposed Rule Change and Timing for
Commission Action

    The foregoing rule change has become effective pursuant to Section
19(b)(3)(A)(ii) of the Act \6\ and paragraph (f)(2) of Rule 19b-4 \7\
thereunder. At any time within 60 days of the filing of the proposed
rule change, the Commission may summarily abrogate such rule change if
it appears to the Commission that such action is necessary or
appropriate in the public interest, for the protection of investors, or
otherwise in furtherance of the purposes of the Act.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \6\ 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(3)(A)(ii).
    \7\ 17 CFR 240.19b-4(f)(2).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

IV. Solicitation of Comments

    Interested persons are invited to submit written data, views, and
arguments concerning the foregoing, including whether the proposed rule
change is consistent with the Act. Comments may be submitted by any of
the following methods:

Electronic Comments

     Use the Commission's Internet comment form (http://
www.sec.gov/rules/sro.shtml); or
     Send an e-mail to<EMAIL_ADDRESS>Please include
File Number SR-Phlx-2009-30 on the subject line.

Paper Comments

     Send paper comments in triplicate to Elizabeth M. Murphy,
Secretary, Securities and Exchange Commission, Station Place, 100 F
Street, NE., Washington, DC 20549-1090.

All submissions should refer to File Number SR-Phlx-2009-30. This file
number should be included on the subject line if e-mail is used. To
help the Commission process and review your comments more efficiently,
please use only one method. The Commission will post all comments on
the Commission's Internet Web site (http://www.sec.gov/rules/
sro.shtml). Copies of the

submission, all subsequent amendments, all written statements with
respect to the proposed rule change that are filed with the Commission,
and all written communications relating to the proposed rule change
between the Commission and any person, other than those that may be
withheld from the public in accordance with the provisions of 5 U.S.C.
552, will be available for inspection and copying in the Commission's
Public Reference Room, 100 F Street, NE., Washington, DC 20549, on
official business days between the hours of 10 a.m. and 3 p.m. Copies
of such filing also will be available for inspection and copying at the
principal office of the Exchange. All comments received will be posted
without change; the Commission does not edit personal identifying
information from submissions. You should submit only information that
you wish to make publicly available. All submissions should refer to
File Number SR-Phlx-2009-30 and should be submitted on or before May 1,
2009.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \8\ 17 CFR 200.30-3(a)(12).

    For the Commission, by the Division of Trading and Markets,
pursuant to delegated authority.\8\
Florence E. Harmon,
Deputy Secretary.
 [FR Doc. E9-8147 Filed 4-9-09; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 8010-01-P


[Federal Register Volume 80, Number 200 (Friday, October 16, 2015)]
[Notices]
[Pages 62527-62528]
[FR Doc No: 2015-26394]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY

[EPA-HQ-OPPT-2013-0677; FRL-9935-75]

Receipt of Test Data Under the Toxic Substances Control Act

AGENCY: Environmental Protection Agency (EPA).

ACTION: Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: EPA is announcing its receipt of test data submitted pursuant
to a test rule issued by EPA under the Toxic Substances Control Act
(TSCA). As required by TSCA, this document identifies each chemical
substance and/or mixture for which test data have been received; the
uses or intended uses of such chemical substance and/or mixture; and
describes the nature of the

test data received. Each chemical substance and/or mixture related to
this announcement is identified in Unit I. under SUPPLEMENTARY
INFORMATION.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: For technical information contact:
Kathy Calvo, Chemical Control Division (7405M), Office of Pollution
Prevention and Toxics, Environmental Protection Agency, 1200
Pennsylvania Ave. NW., Washington, DC 20460-0001; telephone number:
(202) 564-8089; email address<EMAIL_ADDRESS>    For general information contact: The TSCA-Hotline, ABVI-Goodwill,
422 South Clinton Ave. Rochester, NY 14620; telephone number: (202)
554-1404; email address<EMAIL_ADDRESS>
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

I. Chemical Substances and/or Mixtures

    Information about the following chemical substances and/or mixtures
is provided in Unit IV.: D-erythro-hex-2-enonic acid, gamma.-lactone,
monosodium salt. (CAS Number 6381-77-7).

II. Federal Register Publication Requirement

    Section 4(d) of TSCA (15 U.S.C. 2603(d)) requires EPA to publish a
notice in the Federal Register reporting the receipt of test data
submitted pursuant to test rules promulgated under TSCA section 4 (15
U.S.C. 2603).

III. Docket Information

    A docket, identified by the docket identification (ID) number EPA-
HQ-OPPT-2013-0677, has been established for this Federal Register
document that announces the receipt of data. Upon EPA's completion of
its quality assurance review, the test data received will be added to
the docket for the TSCA section 4 test rule that required the test
data. Use the docket ID number provided in Unit IV. to access the test
data in the docket for the related TSCA section 4 test rule.
    The docket for this Federal Register document and the docket for
each related TSCA section 4 test rule is available electronically at
http://www.regulations.gov or in person at the Office of Pollution
Prevention and Toxics Docket (OPPT Docket), Environmental Protection
Agency Docket Center (EPA/DC), West William Jefferson Clinton Bldg.,
Rm. 3334, 1301 Constitution Ave., NW., Washington, DC. The Public
Reading Room is open from 8:30 a.m. to 4:30 p.m., Monday through
Friday, excluding legal holidays. The telephone number for the Public
Reading Room is<PHONE_NUMBER>, and the telephone number for the OPPT
Docket is<PHONE_NUMBER>. Please review the visitor instructions and
additional information about the docket available at http://www.epa.gov/dockets.

IV. Test Data Received

    This unit contains the information required by TSCA section 4(d)
for the test data received by EPA. D-erythro-hex-2-enonic acid, gamma.-
lactone, monosodium salt. (CAS Number 6381-77-7).
    1. Chemical Use(s): Antioxidant in food applications for which the
vitamin activity of ascorbic acid (Vitamin C) is not required.
Specifically, the compound is most frequently used to develop and
retain the coloring and taste in meat products. It is also used for
seafood products, fruit, and vegetable preservation, in beverages, and
as a developing agent in photographic applications.
    2. Applicable Test Rule: Chemical testing requirements for second
group of high production volume chemicals (HPV2), 40 CFR 799.5087.
    3. Test Data Received: The following listing describes the nature
of the test data received. The test data will be added to the docket
for the applicable TSCA section 4 test rule and can be found by
referencing the docket ID number provided. EPA reviews of test data
will be added to the same docket upon completion.
    n-Octanol/Water Partition Coefficient (A4). The docket ID number
assigned to this data is EPA-HQ-OPPT-2007-0531.

    Authority:  15 U.S.C. 2601 et seq.

    Dated: October 8, 2015.
Maria J. Doa,
Director, Chemical Control Division, Office of Pollution Prevention and
Toxics.
[FR Doc. 2015-26394 Filed 10-15-15; 8:45 am]
 BILLING CODE 6560-50-P