[Federal Register: March 29, 2006 (Volume 71, Number 60)]
[Notices]
[Page 15784-15786]
[DOCID:fr29mr06-143]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

[Release No. 34-53536; File No. SR-NASD-2006-026]

Self-Regulatory Organizations; National Association of Securities
Dealers, Inc.; Notice of Filing and Immediate Effectiveness of Proposed
Rule Change and Amendment No. 1 Thereto Establishing CTCI Station-Based
Pricing for Members

March 21, 2006.
    Pursuant to section 19(b)(1) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934
(``Act''),\1\ and Rule 19b-4 thereunder,\2\ notice is hereby given that
on February 22, 2006, the National Association of Securities Dealers,
Inc. (``NASD''), through its subsidiary, The Nasdaq Stock Market, Inc.
(``Nasdaq''), filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission
(``Commission'') the proposed rule change as described in Items I, II,
and III below, which Items have been prepared by Nasdaq. Nasdaq filed
Amendment No. 1 to the proposed rule change on March 10, 2006.\3\
Nasdaq has designated this proposal as establishing or changing a due,
fee, or other charge of a self-regulatory organization, pursuant to
section 19(b)(3)(A)(ii) of the Act,\4\ and Rule 19b-4(f)(2)
thereunder,\5\ which renders the proposed rule change effective upon
filing with the Commission. The Commission is publishing this notice to
solicit comments on the proposed rule change, as amended, from
interested persons.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \1\ 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(1).
    \2\ 17 CFR 240.19b-4.
    \3\ For purposes of calculating the 60-day abrogation period,
the Commission considers the period to have commenced on March 10,
2006, the date Nasdaq filed Amendment No. 1.
    \4\ 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(3)(A)(ii).
    \5\ 17 CFR 240.19b-4(f)(2).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

I. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement of the Terms of the
Substance of the Proposed Rule Change

    Nasdaq proposes to modify fees for Nasdaq access through the
Computer to Computer Interface (``CTCI'') protocol.\6\ The text of the
proposed rule change is below. Proposed new language is in italics;
proposed deletions are in brackets.\7\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \6\ The instant proposed rule change establishes fees for NASD
members. The identical fees for non-memebers were established in SR-
NASD-2006-027. See Securities Exchange Act Release No. 53535 (March
21, 2006).
    \7\ Changes are marked to the rule text that appears in the
electronic NASD Manual found at http://www.nasd.com. Prior to the

date when The NASDAQ Stock Market LLC (``NASDAQ LLC'') commences
operations, NASDAQ LLC will file a confirming change to the rules of
NASDAQ LLC approved in Securites Exchange Act Release No. 53128
(January 13, 2006), 71 FR 3550 (January 23, 2006) (File No. 10-131).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

Rule 7010. System Services

    (a)-(e) No Change
    (f)(1)-(2) No Change
    (3) [Computer to computer interface (CTCI) and] Financial
Information Exchange (FIX)

------------------------------------------------------------------------
                  Options                               Price
------------------------------------------------------------------------
[Option 1: Dual 56kb lines (one for         [$1275/month].
 redundancy) single hub and router, and
 optional single FIX port.].
[Option 2: Dual 56kb lines (one for         [$1600/month].
 redundancy), dual hubs (one for
 redundancy), and dual routers (one for
 redundancy), and optional single FIX
 port.].
[Option 3: Dual T1 lines (one for           [$8000/month (CTCI or CTCI/
 redundancy), dual hubs (one for             FIX lines) $4000/month (FIX-
 redundancy), dual routers (one for          only lines)].
 redundancy), and optional single FIX
 port. Includes base bandwidth of 128kb.].
FIX Trading Port (NMC and Brut)...........  $400/port/month.
FIX Port for Services Other than Trading..  $500/port/month.
Dedicated FIX server......................  $1,000/server/month.
Dedicated FIX server (Brut)...............  $3,000/server/month; initial
                                             term of not less than 12
                                             months is required.
[Option 1, 2, or 3 with Message Queue       [Fee for Option 1, 2, or 3
 software enhancement].                      (including any Bandwidth
                                             Enhancement Fee) plus 20%].
[Disaster Recovery Option: Single 56kb      [$975/month].
 line with single hub and router and
 optional single FIX port. (For remote
 disaster recovery sites only.)].
[Bandwidth Enhancement Fee (for T1          [$600/month per 64kb
 subscribers only)].                         increase above 128kb T1
                                             base].
[Installation Fee]........................  [$2000 per site for dual
                                             hubs and routers
                                            $1000 per site for single
                                             hub and router].
[Relocation Fee (for the movement of TCP/   [$1700 per relocation].
 IP-capable lines within a single
 location)].
------------------------------------------------------------------------

    [FIX connectivity through Options 1, 2, or 3 or the Disaster
Recovery Option will not be available to new subscribers that are (i)
NASD members after January 1, 2004, or (ii) not NASD members after the
effective date of SR-NASD-2003-196.]
    (4) Computer to Computer Interface (CTCI).
    The fees in the table below are applicable to NASD members that
have transitioned off of Nasdaq-supported circuits, and as of July 1,
2006, also apply to NASD members that have not transitioned.

                                Stations
------------------------------------------------------------------------
               Fee component                             Fee
------------------------------------------------------------------------
1st Station...............................  $200/Station/month
Each Additional Station...................  $600/Station/month
------------------------------------------------------------------------

    The bandwidth-based fees in the table below apply to NASD members
that have not transitioned off of Nasdaq-supported circuits, and,
pending approval of SR-NASD-2006-027, to non-members as indicated.

                                Bandwidth
------------------------------------------------------------------------
               Fee component                             Fee
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Single 56kb line with single hub and        $900/month for members
 router (for remote disaster recovery       $975/month for non-members
 sites only).
                                Option 1
Dual 56kb lines (one for redundancy) and    $1,000/month for members
 single hub and router.                     $1,275/month for non-members

                                Option 2
Dual 56kb lines (one for redundancy), dual  $1,200/month for members
 hubs (one for redundancy), and dual        $1,600/month for non-members
 router (one for redundancy).
                                Option 3
Dual T1 lines (one for redundancy), dual    $2,500/month for members
 hubs (one for redundancy), and dual        $8,000/month for non-members
 routers (one for redundancy). Includes
 base bandwidth of 128kb.
          Bandwidth Enhancement Fee (for T1 subscribers only)
Per 64kb increase above 128kb T1 base.....  $200/month for members
                                            $600/month for non-members
Option 1, 2, or 3 with Message Queue        Fee for Option 1, 2, or 3
 software enhancement.                       (including any Bandwidth
                                            Enhancement Fee) plus 20%
Installation Fee..........................  $2,000 per site for dual
                                             hubs and routers
                                            $1,000 per site for single
                                             hub and router
Relocation Fee (for the movement of TCP/IP- $1,700 per relocation
 capable lines within a single location).
------------------------------------------------------------------------

    [(4)] (5) New Nasdaq Workstation.
    (g)-(w) No Change.
* * * * *

II. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement of the Purpose of, and
Statutory Basis for, the Proposed Rule Change

    In its filing with the Commission, Nasdaq included statements
concerning the purpose of and basis for the proposed rule change and
discussed any comments it received on the proposed rule change. The
text of these statements may be examined at the places specified in
Item IV below. Nasdaq has prepared summaries, set forth in sections A,
B, and C below, of the most significant aspects of such statements.

A. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement of the Purpose of, and
Statutory Basis for, the Proposed Rule Change

1. Purpose
    Nasdaq is modifying fees for member access to Nasdaq through the
CTCI protocol. Through the implementation of FIX and QIX and the sunset
of the SDP/API, Nasdaq has continued towards its goal of allowing firms
and service bureaus to choose their own circuit connectivity provider
for access to Nasdaq's products and services. CTCI is the only
remaining Nasdaq protocol that requires the firm to choose a Nasdaq-
provided circuit for connectivity. In order for Nasdaq to complete its
strategy, Nasdaq seeks to modify the CTCI pricing structure in order to
transition from circuit-based fee components based on bandwidth to
``Station'' fee components that are more synonymous with logical access
ports.
    CTCI Stations are logical channels used to manage the flow of data
to and from the firm user. Stations are synonymous with the logical
access ports used for FIX and QIX as they have the same
characteristics, including a one-to-one relationship between the firm
and Station and throughput limits. For this reason, Nasdaq chose a
Station-based fee component for its new pricing. In order to facilitate
the transition, Nasdaq seeks to modify the current bandwidth based fees
to Nasdaq's circuit cost imposed by its carrier plus an administration
cost. Firms that decide not to transition off of Nasdaq supported
circuits will pay the new bandwidth-based fees in addition to Station
fees.
    Nasdaq expects almost all firms to transition to new circuit
connections but that the transition date will be different for each
firm. As a result, Nasdaq intends to implement the new pricing
structure once a firm has transitioned to a different circuit
connection. However, the new pricing will be applied to all firms on
July 1, 2006 regardless of the firm's transition plan. Thus, a firm
that transitions will pay only the station fee. A firm that does not
transition will pay only the bandwidth fee prior to July 1, but will
pay both the station and the bandwidth fee between July 1 and the date
when it does transition.
2. Statutory Basis
    Nasdaq believes the proposed rule change is consistent with the
provisions of section 15A of the Act,\8\ in general, and sections
15A(b)(5) \9\ of the Act, in particular, in that it provides for the
equitable allocation of reasonable dues, fees, and other charges among
members and issuers and other persons using any facility or system
which the NASD operates or controls. The proposed rule change will
modify the current CTCI pricing structure in order to transition from
circuit-based fee components based on bandwidth to ``Station'' fee
components that are more synonymous with logical access ports.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \8\ 15 U.S.C. 78o-3.
    \9\ 15 U.S.C. 78o-3(b)(5).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

B. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement on Burden on Competition

    Nasdaq does not believe that the proposed rule change will result
in any burden on competition that is not necessary or appropriate in
furtherance of the purposes of the Act, as amended.

C. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement on Comments on the Proposed
Rule Change Received From Members, Participants or Others

    Written comments were neither solicited nor received.

III. Date of Effectiveness of the Proposed Rule Change and Timing for
Commission Action

    The proposed rule change has become effective pursuant to section
19(b)(3)(A)(ii) of the Act \10\ and subparagraph (f)(2) of Rule 19b-4
thereunder,\11\ because it establishes or changes a due, fee, or other
charge imposed by NASD. At any time within 60 days of the filing of the
proposed rule change, the Commission may summarily abrogate such rule
change if it appears to the Commission that such action is necessary or
appropriate in the public interest, for the protection of investors, or
otherwise in furtherance of the purposes of the Act.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \10\ 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(3)(A)(ii).
    \11\ 17 CFR 240.19b-4(f)(2).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

IV. Solicitation of Comments

    Interested persons are invited to submit written data, views, and
arguments concerning the foregoing,

including whether the proposed rule change is consistent with the Act.
Comments may be submitted by any of the following methods:

Electronic Comments

     Use the Commission's Internet comment form (http://www.sec.gov/rules/sro.shtml.
); or     Send an e-mail to<EMAIL_ADDRESS>Please include

File Number SR-NASD-2006-026 on the subject line.

Paper Comments

     Send paper comments in triplicate to Nancy M. Morris,
Secretary, Securities and Exchange Commission, 100 F Street, NE.,
Washington, DC 20549-1090.

All submissions should refer to File Number NASD-2006-026. This file
number should be included on the subject line if e-mail is used. To
help the Commission process and review your comments more efficiently,
please use only one method. The Commission will post all comments on
the Commission's Internet Web site (http://www.sec.gov/rules/sro.shtml
). Copies of the submission, all subsequent amendments, all

written statements with respect to the proposed rule change that are
filed with the Commission, and all written communications relating to
the proposed rule change between the Commission and any person, other
than those that may be withheld from the public in accordance with the
provisions of 5 U.S.C. 552, will be available for inspection and
copying in the Commission's Public Reference Room. Copies of the filing
also will be available for inspection and copying at the principal
offices of NASD. All comments received will be posted without change;
the Commission does not edit personal identifying information from
submissions. You should submit only information that you wish to make
available publicly. All submissions should refer to File Number NASD-
2006-026 and should be submitted on or before April 19, 2006.

    For the Commission, by the Division of Market Regulation,
pursuant to delegated authority.\12\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \12\ 17 CFR 200.30-3(a)(12).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

Nancy M. Morris,
Secretary.
 [FR Doc. E6-4515 Filed 3-28-06; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 8010-01-P


  SEQ CHAPTER \h \r 1 UNITED STATES ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY

WASHINGTON, D.C. 20460

OFFICE OF

	SOLID WASTE AND EMERGENCY

RESPONSE

Note to docket

December 23, 2014

Re:  EPA-HQ-SFUND-2014-0733 - Technical Amendment to Update Data
Management System Nomenclature, Notice of Proposed Rulemaking

On December 2, 2014, the EPA received the following comment on the
Notice of Proposed Rulemaking (NPRM) for the technical amendment to the
National Oil and Hazardous Substances Pollution Contingency Plan (NCP)
to update the data management system nomenclature, “The authority
section for this regulation cites 33 USC 1321(c)(2). This is incorrect.
That section is about Discharges Posing Substantial Threat to Public
Health or Welfare. The correct citation should be to 33 USC 1321(d)
which is about the National Contingency Plan. When the executive branch
regulates, it is required to state the authority for its regulation.”

In response, the commenter correctly identified the first authority
citation as pertaining to discharges to waterways which pose a
substantial threat to public health and welfare, which is relevant to
the implementation of the NCP. However, the commenter did not consider
the remainder of the authority citation, the second of which, 42 USC
9601-9657, includes the entire NCP at 42 USC 9605. The EPA was well
within its stated authority to amend the NCP for this data system
nomenclature update.

Further, the NPRM states that if adverse comments are received on this
action, the EPA will withdraw the proposed rule and address all relevant
public comments before proceeding with a final rule. Because the above
comment does not address the action to update the NCP’s data system
nomenclature, and because the EPA clearly stated its authority for this
regulation, we are not considering this an adverse comment and are
proceeding with the final rule.

  PAGE  2

  PAGE  3


[Federal Register Volume 87, Number 7 (Tuesday, January 11, 2022)]
[Notices]
[Pages 1453-1454]
[FR Doc No: 2022-00263]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

[Release No. 34-93901; File No. SR-NYSEAMER-2021-48]

Self-Regulatory Organizations; NYSE American LLC; Notice of
Filing and Immediate Effectiveness of Proposed Change To Amend the NYSE
American Options Fee Schedule With Respect to a Regulatory Fee Related
to the Central Registration Depository

January 5, 2022.
    Pursuant to Section 19(b)(1) \1\ of the Securities Exchange Act of
1934 (the ``Act'') \2\ and Rule 19b-4 thereunder,\3\ notice is hereby
given that, on December 22, 2021, NYSE American LLC (``NYSE American''
or the ``Exchange'') filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission
(the ``Commission'') the proposed rule change as described in Items I,
II, and III below, which Items have been prepared by the self-
regulatory organization. The Commission is publishing this notice to
solicit comments on the proposed rule change from interested persons.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \1\ 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(1).
    \2\ 15 U.S.C. 78a.
    \3\ 17 CFR 240.19b-4.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

I. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement of the Terms of Substance
of the Proposed Rule Change

    The Exchange proposes to amend the NYSE American Options Fee
Schedule (the ``Fee Schedule'') with respect to a regulatory fee
related to the Central Registration Depository (``CRD system''), which
is collected by the Financial Industry Regulatory Authority, Inc.
(``FINRA''). The Exchange proposes to implement the fee change on
January 2, 2022. The proposed change is available on the Exchange's
website at www.nyse.com, at the principal office of the Exchange, and
at the Commission's Public Reference Room.

II. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement of the Purpose of, and
Statutory Basis for, the Proposed Rule Change

    In its filing with the Commission, the self-regulatory organization
included statements concerning the purpose of, and basis for, the
proposed rule change and discussed any comments it received on the
proposed rule change. The text of those statements may be examined at
the places specified in Item IV below. The Exchange has prepared
summaries, set forth in sections A, B, and C below, of the most
significant parts of such statements.

A. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement of the Purpose of, and the
Statutory Basis for, the Proposed Rule Change

1. Purpose
    The Exchange proposes to amend the Fee Schedule with respect to a
regulatory fee collected by FINRA for use of the CRD system.\4\ The
Exchange proposes to implement the fee change on January 2, 2022.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \4\ The CRD system is the central licensing and registration
system for the U.S. securities industry. The CRD system enables
individuals and firms seeking registration with multiple states and
self-regulatory organizations to do so by submitting a single form,
fingerprint card, and a combined payment of fees to FINRA. Through
the CRD system, FINRA maintains the qualification, employment, and
disciplinary histories of registered associated persons of broker-
dealers.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    FINRA collects and retains certain regulatory fees via the CRD
system for the registration of associated persons of ATP Holders that
are not FINRA members (``Non-FINRA ATP Holders'').\5\ The CRD system
fees are user-based, and there is no distinction in the cost incurred
by FINRA if the user is a FINRA member or a Non-FINRA ATP Holder.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \5\ The Exchange originally adopted fees for use of the CRD
system in 2003 and amended those fees in 2013. See Securities
Exchange Act Release Nos. 48066 (June 19, 2003), 68 FR 38409 (June
27, 2003) (SR-Amex-2003-49); 68589 (January 4, 2013), 78 FR 2465
(January 11, 2013) (SR-NYSEMKT-2012-89). While the Exchange lists
these fees in its Fee Schedule, it does not collect or retain these
fees.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    FINRA recently amended one of the fees assessed for use of the CRD
system, which will become effective January 2, 2022.\6\ Accordingly,
the Exchange proposes to amend the Fee Schedule to mirror the fee
assessed by FINRA, which will be implemented concurrently with the
amended FINRA fee on January 2, 2022.\7\ Specifically, the Exchange
proposes to amend the Fee

Schedule to modify the fee charged to Non-FINRA ATP Holders for each
initial Form U4 filed for the registration of a representative or
principal from $100 to $125.\8\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \6\ See Securities Exchange Act Release No. 90176 (October 14,
2020), 85 FR 66592 (October 20, 2020) (SR-FINRA-2020-032).
    \7\ The Exchange notes that it has only adopted the CRD system
fees charged by FINRA to Non-FINRA ATP Holders when such fees are
applicable. In this regard, certain FINRA CRD system fees and
requirements are specific to FINRA members, but do not apply to NYSE
American-only ATP Holders. Non-FINRA ATP Holders have been charged
CRD system fees since 2003. See note 5, supra. ATP Holders that are
also FINRA members are charged CRD system fees according to Section
4 of Schedule A to the FINRA By-Laws.
    \8\ See Section 4(b)(1) of Schedule A to the FINRA By-Laws
effective on January 2, 2022. This fee is assessed when a Non-FINRA
ATP Holder submits an initial Uniform Application for Securities
Industry Regulation or Transfer (known as a ``Form U4'') filed by a
member in the CRD system to register an individual.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    The Exchange notes that the proposed change is not otherwise
intended to address any other issues surrounding regulatory fees, and
the Exchange is not aware of any problems that ATP Holders would have
in complying with the proposed change.
2. Statutory Basis
    The Exchange believes that the proposed rule change is consistent
with Section 6(b) of the Act,\9\ in general, and furthers the
objectives of Sections 6(b)(4) and 6(b)(5),\10\ in particular, because
it provides for the equitable allocation of reasonable dues, fees, and
other charges among its members, issuers, and other persons using its
facilities and does not unfairly discriminate between customers,
issuers, brokers, or dealers.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \9\ 15 U.S.C. 78f(b).
    \10\ 15 U.S.C. 78f(b)(4) & (5).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    The Exchange believes that the proposed fee change is reasonable
because the fee will be identical to that adopted by FINRA as of
January 2, 2022 for use of the CRD system to submit a Form U4. The
costs of operating and improving the CRD system are similarly borne by
FINRA when a Non-FINRA ATP Holder uses the CRD system; accordingly, the
fees collected for such use should, as proposed by the Exchange, mirror
the fees assessed to FINRA members. In addition, as FINRA noted in
amending its fees, it believes that its proposed pricing structure is
reasonable and correlates fees with the components that drive its
regulatory costs to the extent feasible.
    The Exchange also believes that the proposed fee change provides
for the equitable allocation of reasonable fees and other charges, and
does not unfairly discriminate between customers, issuers, brokers, and
dealers. The fee applies equally to all individuals and firms required
to report information to the CRD system, and the proposed change will
result in the same regulatory fee being charged to all ATP Holders
required to report information to the CRD system and for services
performed by FINRA regardless of whether such ATP Holders are FINRA
members. Accordingly, the Exchange believes that the fee collected for
such use should increase in lockstep with the fee adopted by FINRA as
of January 2, 2022, as is proposed by the Exchange.

B. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement on Burden on Competition

    The Exchange does not believe that the proposed rule change will
impose any burden on competition that is not necessary or appropriate
in furtherance of the purposes of the Act. Specifically, the Exchange
believes that the proposed change will update the Fee Schedule to
reflect the fee that will be assessed by FINRA for Form U4 filings as
of January 2, 2022 and will thus result in the same regulatory fees
being charged to all ATP Holders required to report information to the
CRD system and for services performed by FINRA regardless of whether or
not such ATP Holders are FINRA members.

C. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement on Comments on the Proposed
Rule Change Received From Members, Participants, or Others

    No written comments were solicited or received with respect to the
proposed rule change.

III. Date of Effectiveness of the Proposed Rule Change and Timing for
Commission Action

    The foregoing rule change is effective upon filing pursuant to
Section 19(b)(3)(A) \11\ of the Act and subparagraph (f)(2) of Rule
19b-4 \12\ thereunder, because it establishes a due, fee, or other
charge imposed by the Exchange.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \11\ 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(3)(A).
    \12\ 17 CFR 240.19b-4(f)(2).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    At any time within 60 days of the filing of such proposed rule
change, the Commission summarily may temporarily suspend such rule
change if it appears to the Commission that such action is necessary or
appropriate in the public interest, for the protection of investors, or
otherwise in furtherance of the purposes of the Act. If the Commission
takes such action, the Commission shall institute proceedings under
Section 19(b)(2)(B) \13\ of the Act to determine whether the proposed
rule change should be approved or disapproved.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \13\ 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(2)(B).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

IV. Solicitation of Comments

    Interested persons are invited to submit written data, views, and
arguments concerning the foregoing, including whether the proposed rule
change is consistent with the Act. Comments may be submitted by any of
the following methods:

Electronic Comments

     Use the Commission's internet comment form (http://www.sec.gov/rules/sro.shtml); or
     Send an email to [email protected]. Please include
File Number SR-NYSEAMER-2021-48 on the subject line.

Paper Comments

     Send paper comments in triplicate to: Secretary,
Securities and Exchange Commission, 100 F Street NE, Washington, DC
20549-1090.

All submissions should refer to File Number SR-NYSEAMER-2021-48. This
file number should be included on the subject line if email is used. To
help the Commission process and review your comments more efficiently,
please use only one method. The Commission will post all comments on
the Commission's internet website (http://www.sec.gov/rules/sro.shtml).
Copies of the submission, all subsequent amendments, all written
statements with respect to the proposed rule change that are filed with
the Commission, and all written communications relating to the proposed
rule change between the Commission and any person, other than those
that may be withheld from the public in accordance with the provisions
of 5 U.S.C. 552, will be available for website viewing and printing in
the Commission's Public Reference Room, 100 F Street NE, Washington, DC
20549 on official business days between the hours of 10:00 a.m. and
3:00 p.m. Copies of the filing also will be available for inspection
and copying at the principal office of the Exchange. All comments
received will be posted without change. Persons submitting comments are
cautioned that we do not redact or edit personal identifying
information from comment submissions. You should submit only
information that you wish to make available publicly. All submissions
should refer to File Number SR-NYSEAMER-2021-48 and should be submitted
on or before February 1, 2022.

    For the Commission, by the Division of Trading and Markets,
pursuant to delegated authority.\14\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \14\ 17 CFR 200.30-3(a)(12).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

J. Matthew DeLesDernier,
Assistant Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2022-00263 Filed 1-10-22; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 8011-01-P


Posted: May 16, 2003													Served: May 21, 2003

3:20pm

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION

OFFICE OF THE SECRETARY

WASHINGTON, D.C.

EXTENSION FOR COMMENTS REGARDING RURAL SERVICE

IMPROVEMENT ACT, DOCKETS 14694 AND 14695

NOTICE

On April 15, 2003, served April 21, 2003, the Department requested
comments regarding the Rural Air Service Improvement Act of 2002.
Comments are due on May 21, 2003.  On May 14, 2003, Hank Myers,
representing several Alaska bush carriers directly affected by this law,
requested an extension to respond.  He indicated that several carriers,
had not received the Request for Comments until he had notified them of
it, and requested an extension to close of business on June 2.  We will
grant his request, and give all interested parties until June 2 to
submit comments.

In order to ensure that all parties are timely served with future
documents in this proceeding, we have attached the current service list
to this proceeding and ask all parties to correct, or add their full
addresses, including e-mail, phone, and fax numbers within 14 days of
the service date of this notice.  The information should be sent to:
Dockets Operations and Media Management, M-30, PL 401, U.S. Department
of Transportation, 400 7th Street, SW, Washington, D.C. 20590,
Dockets 2003-14694 and 14695.

This action is effective immediately.

Action taken by:	RANDALL D. BENNETT

Director

					Office of Aviation Analysis

					Office of the Secretary

An electronic version of this document is available on the World Wide
Web at

  HYPERLINK "http://dms.dot.gov"  http://dms.dot.gov

 PAGE

-  PAGE   2  -


A list of meeting materials submitted by the EarthJustice during a non-government stakeholder listening session with the OMB and various EOP offices held on 06/03/2022 for the Accidental Release Prevention Requirements: Risk Management Program Under the Clean Air Act; Safer Communities by Chemical Accident Prevention. A Proposed Rule.

Attachment 1.	RMP Chem Disaster Prevention Comments 07-29-2021
Attachment 2. 58 groups - EJHA et al comments EPA-HQ-OLEM-2021-0312-0149_
Attachment 3.	Colorado delegation letter to Regan
Attachment 4.	GAO Chem Facility Report Feb 2022
Attachment 5.	Double Disasters Full Report July 2021
Attachment 6.	Booker Barragan Letter to Regan April 2022
Attachment 7.	Faith Letter Urging Strengthened RMP May 2022
Attachment 8	RMP-health-experts-letter-to-EPA-final April 2022
Attachment 9.	7-29-2021 Letter to EPA Administrator Regan on Double Disasters (1)
Attachment 10. RMP electeds letter January 2022
Attachment 11. Security Ltr to EPA Director Regan 4-21-22