[Federal Register Volume 78, Number 190 (Tuesday, October 1, 2013)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Pages 60220-60222]
[FR Doc No: 2013-23860]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY

Coast Guard

33 CFR Part 165

[Docket Number USCG-2013-0623]
RIN 1625-AA00

Safety Zone; Fireworks Display, Willamette River, Oregon City, OR

AGENCY: Coast Guard, DHS.

ACTION: Temporary final rule.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Coast Guard is establishing a safety zone in Oregon City,
OR. This safety zone is necessary to help ensure the safety of the
maritime public during a fireworks display and will do so by
prohibiting unauthorized persons and vessels from entering the safety
zones unless authorized by the Sector Columbia River Captain of the
Port or his designated representatives.

DATES: This rule is effective on October 5, 2013 from 8:00 p.m. to 8:30
p.m.

ADDRESSES: Documents mentioned in this preamble are part of docket
[USCG-2013-0623]. To view documents mentioned in this preamble as being
available in the docket, go to http://www.regulations.gov, type the
docket number in the ``SEARCH'' box and click ``SEARCH.'' Click on Open
Docket Folder on the line associated with this rulemaking. You may also
visit the Docket Management Facility in Room W12-140 on the ground
floor of the Department of Transportation West Building, 1200 New
Jersey Avenue SE., Washington, DC 20590, between 9 a.m. and 5 p.m.,
Monday through Friday, except Federal holidays.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: If you have questions on this rule,
call or email LTJG Ian McPhillips, Waterways Management Division,
Marine Safety Unit Portland, Coast Guard; telephone<PHONE_NUMBER>, email
<EMAIL_ADDRESS>If you have questions on viewing or submitting
material to the docket, call Barbara Hairston, Program Manager, Docket
Operations, telephone<PHONE_NUMBER>.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

Table of Acronyms

DHS Department of Homeland Security
FR Federal Register
NPRM Notice of Proposed Rulemaking

A. Regulatory History and Information

    The Coast Guard is issuing this temporary final rule without prior
notice and opportunity to comment pursuant to authority under section
4(a) of the Administrative Procedure Act

(APA) (5 U.S.C. 553(b)). This provision authorizes an agency to issue a
rule without prior notice and opportunity to comment when the agency
for good cause finds that those procedures are ``impracticable,
unnecessary, or contrary to the public interest.'' Under 5 U.S.C. 553,
the Coast Guard finds that good cause exists for not publishing a
notice of proposed rulemaking (NPRM) with respect to this rule. Waiting
for a 30 day notice period to run would be impracticable and contrary
to the public interest. The Coast Guard did not receive the necessary
information in time for this regulation to undertake both an NPRM and a
30 day delayed effective date. Additionally, waiting for a 30 day
notice period to run would be impracticable as delayed promulgation may
result in injury or damage to persons and vessels from the hazards
associated with fireworks displays.
    Under 5 U.S.C. 553(d)(3), the Coast Guard finds that good cause
exists for making this rule effective less than 30 days after
publication in the Federal Register due to the late notification of
this event and that the event will have occurred before comments could
have been taken.

B. Basis and Purpose

    Coast Guard Captains of the Port are granted authority to establish
safety and security zones in 33 CFR 1.05-1(f) for safety and
environmental purposes as described in 33 CFR part 165.
    Fireworks displays create hazardous conditions for the maritime
public because of the large number of vessels that congregate near the
displays, as well as the noise, falling debris, and explosions that
occur during the event. This safety zone is necessary in order to
reduce vessel traffic congestion in the proximity of fireworks
discharge sites to prevent vessel traffic within the fallout zone of
the fireworks.

C. Discussion of the Temporary Final Rule

    This rule establishes one safety zone in the Sector Columbia River
Captain of the Port Zone.
    The safety zone would be established to encompass all waters of the
Willamette River south of the I-205 Bridge and north of the Oregon City
Bridge, Oregon City, OR. The safety zone will encompass approximately
1,000 feet of river length. This event will be held on Saturday,
October 5, 2013 from 8:00 p.m. to 8:30 p.m.

D. Regulatory Analyses

    We developed this rule after considering numerous statutes and
executive orders related to rulemaking. Below we summarize our analyses
based on these statutes and executive orders.

1. Regulatory Planning and Review

    This rule is not a significant regulatory action under section 3(f)
of Executive Order 12866, Regulatory Planning and Review, as
supplemented by Executive Order 13563, Improving Regulation and
Regulatory Review, and does not require an assessment of potential
costs and benefits under section 6(a)(3) of Executive Order 12866 or
under section 1 of Executive Order 13563. The Office of Management and
Budget has not reviewed it under those Orders. The Coast Guard has made
this determination based on the fact that the safety zone created by
this rule will not significantly affect the maritime public because
vessels may still coordinate their transit with the Coast Guard in the
vicinity of the safety zone.

2. Impact on Small Entities

    The Regulatory Flexibility Act of 1980 (RFA), 5 U.S.C. 601-612, as
amended, requires federal agencies to consider the potential impact of
regulations on small entities during rulemaking. The term ``small
entities'' comprises small businesses, not-for-profit organizations
that are independently owned and operated and are not dominant in their
fields, and governmental jurisdictions with populations of less than
50,000. The Coast Guard certifies under 5 U.S.C. 605(b) that this rule
will not have a significant economic impact on a substantial number of
small entities.
    (1) This rule may affect the following entities, some of which may
be small entities: The owners and operators of vessels intending to
operate in the area covered by the safety zone. This safety zone will
not have a significant economic impact on a substantial number of small
entities because the area can still be used to transit with permission
of the Captain of the Port. The rule will not have a significant
economic impact on a substantial number of small entities because the
safety zone will only be in effect late in the evening when vessel
traffic is low. Before the effective period, we will publish advisories
in the Local Notice to Mariners available to users of the river.
Maritime traffic will be able to schedule their transits around the
safety zone.
    If you think that your business, organization, or governmental
jurisdiction qualifies as a small entity and that this rule would have
a significant economic impact on it, please submit a comment (see
ADDRESSES) explaining why you think it qualifies and how and to what
degree this rule would economically affect it.

3. Assistance for Small Entities

    Under section 213(a) of the Small Business Regulatory Enforcement
Fairness Act of 1996 (Pub. L. 104-121), we want to assist small
entities in understanding this rule. If the rule would affect your
small business, organization, or governmental jurisdiction and you have
questions concerning its provisions or options for compliance, please
contact the person listed in the FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT,
above.
    Small businesses may send comments on the actions of Federal
employees who enforce, or otherwise determine compliance with, Federal
regulations to the Small Business and Agriculture Regulatory
Enforcement Ombudsman and the Regional Small Business Regulatory
Fairness Boards. The Ombudsman evaluates these actions annually and
rates each agency's responsiveness to small business. If you wish to
comment on actions by employees of the Coast Guard, call 1-888-REG-FAIR
(1-888-734-3247). The Coast Guard will not retaliate against small
entities that question or complain about this rule or any policy or
action of the Coast Guard.

4. Collection of Information

    This rule will not call for a new collection of information under
the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 (44 U.S.C. 3501-3520).

5. Federalism

    A rule has implications for federalism under Executive Order 13132,
Federalism, if it has a substantial direct effect on the States, on the
relationship between the national government and the States, or on the
distribution of power and responsibilities among the various levels of
government. We have analyzed this rule under that Order and determined
that this rule does not have implications for federalism.

6. Protest Activities

    The Coast Guard respects the First Amendment rights of protesters.
Protesters are asked to contact the person listed in the FOR FURTHER
INFORMATION CONTACT section to coordinate protest activities so that
your message can be received without jeopardizing the safety or
security of people, places or vessels.

7. Unfunded Mandates Reform Act

    The Unfunded Mandates Reform Act of 1995 (2 U.S.C. 1531-1538)
requires Federal agencies to assess the effects of

their discretionary regulatory actions. In particular, the Act
addresses actions that may result in the expenditure by a State, local,
or tribal government, in the aggregate, or by the private sector of
$100,000,000 (adjusted for inflation) or more in any one year. Though
this rule will not result in such expenditure, we do not discuss the
effects of this rule elsewhere in this preamble.

8. Taking of Private Property

    This rule will not cause a taking of private property or otherwise
have taking implications under Executive Order 12630, Governmental
Actions and Interference with Constitutionally Protected Property
Rights.

9. Civil Justice Reform

    This rule meets applicable standards in sections 3(a) and 3(b)(2)
of Executive Order 12988, Civil Justice Reform, to minimize litigation,
eliminate ambiguity, and reduce burden.

10. Protection of Children

    We have analyzed this rule under Executive Order 13045, Protection
of Children from Environmental Health Risks and Safety Risks. This rule
is not an economically significant rule and does not create an
environmental risk to health or risk to safety that may
disproportionately affect children.

11. Indian Tribal Governments

    This rule does not have tribal implications under Executive Order
13175, Consultation and Coordination with Indian Tribal Governments,
because it does not have a substantial direct effect on one or more
Indian tribes, on the relationship between the Federal Government and
Indian tribes, or on the distribution of power and responsibilities
between the Federal Government and Indian tribes.

12. Energy Effects

    This action is not a ``significant energy action'' under Executive
Order 13211, Actions Concerning Regulations That Significantly Affect
Energy Supply, Distribution, or Use.

13. Technical Standards

    This rule does not use technical standards. Therefore, we did not
consider the use of voluntary consensus standards.

14. Environment

    We have analyzed this rule under Department of Homeland Security
Management Directive 023-01 and Commandant Instruction M16475.lD, which
guide the Coast Guard in complying with the National Environmental
Policy Act of 1969 (NEPA) (42 U.S.C. 4321-4370f), and have determined
that this action is one of a category of actions that do not
individually or cumulatively have a significant effect on the human
environment. This rule involves the creation of one safety zone during
fireworks displays to protect maritime public. This rule is
categorically excluded from further review under paragraph 34(g) of
Figure 2-1 of the Commandant Instruction. An environmental analysis
checklist supporting this determination and a Categorical Exclusion
Determination are available in the docket where indicated under
ADDRESSES. We seek any comments or information that may lead to the
discovery of a significant environmental impact from this rule.

List of Subjects in 33 CFR Part 165

    Harbors, Marine safety, Navigation (water), Reporting and
recordkeeping requirements, Security measures, Waterways.

    For the reasons discussed in the preamble, the Coast Guard amends
33 CFR Part 165 as follows:

PART 165--REGULATED NAVIGATION AREAS AND LIMITED ACCESS AREAS

0
1. The authority citation for part 165 continues to read as follows:

    Authority:  33 U.S.C. 1231; 46 U.S.C. Chapter 701, 3306, 3703;
50 U.S.C. 191, 195; 33 CFR 1.05-1(g), 6.04-1, 6.04-6, 160.5; Pub. L.
107-295, 116 Stat. 2064; Department of Homeland Security Delegation
No. 0170.1.

0
2. Add Sec.  165.T13-259 to read as follows:

Sec.  165.T13-259  Safety Zone; Clackamas County Tourism Fireworks
Display, Oregon City, OR.

    (a) Safety zones. The following area is a designated safety zone:
    (1) Location. All waters of the Willamette River, Oregon City, OR,
between the I-205 Bridge and the Oregon City Bridge.
    (2) Enforcement period. This event will be held on October 5, 2013
from 8:00 p.m. to 8:30 p.m.
    (b) Regulations. In accordance with the general regulations in 33
CFR Part 165, subpart C, no person may enter or remain in the safety
zone created in this section or bring, cause to be brought, or allow to
remain in the safety zone created in this section any vehicle, vessel,
or object unless authorized by the Captain of the Port or his
designated representative. The Captain of the Port may be assisted by
other Federal, State, or local agencies with the enforcement of the
safety zone.

    Dated: September 10, 2013.
S.C. MacKenzie,
Captain, U.S. Coast Guard, Acting Captain of the Port, Sector Columbia
River.
[FR Doc. 2013-23860 Filed 9-30-13; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 9110-04-P


[Federal Register: November 4, 2009 (Volume 74, Number 212)]
[Notices]
[Page 57217-57219]
[DOCID:fr04no09-116]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

[Release No. 34-60897; File No. SR-ISE-2009-85]

Self-Regulatory Organizations; Notice of Filing and Immediate
Effectiveness of Proposed Rule Change by the International Securities
Exchange, LLC Related to Market Maker Guidelines

October 28, 2009.
    Pursuant to Section 19(b)(1) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934
(the ``Act'') \1\ and Rule 19b-4 thereunder,\2\ notice is hereby given
that, on October 22, 2009, the International Securities Exchange, LLC
(the ``Exchange'' or the ``ISE'') filed with the Securities and
Exchange Commission (``Commission'') the proposed rule change as
described in Items I, II and III below, which Items have been prepared
by the Exchange. The Exchange has filed the proposal as a ``non-
controversial'' proposed rule change pursuant to Section
19(b)(3)(A)(iii) of the Act \3\ and Rule 19b-4(f)(6) thereunder.\4\ The
Commission is publishing this notice to solicit comments on the
proposed rule change from interested persons.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \1\ 15 U.S.C.78s(b)(1).
    \2\ 17 CFR 240.19b-4.
    \3\ 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(3)(A).
    \4\ 17 CFR 240.19b-4(f)(6).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

I. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement of the Terms of Substance
of the Proposed Rule Change

    The Exchange proposes to amend Rule 803 to eliminate the provision
providing for bids (offers) to be no more than $1 lower (higher) that
the last preceding transaction plus or minus the aggregate change in
the last sale price of the underlying, and amend the provision
pertaining to trades that are more than $0.25 below parity. The text of
the proposed rule change is available on the Exchange's Web site http:/
/www.ise.com, at the principal office of the Exchange, and at the
Commission's Public Reference Room.

II. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement of the Purpose of, and
Statutory Basis for, the Proposed Rule Change

    In its filing with the Commission, the Exchange included statements
concerning the purpose of, and basis for, the proposed rule change and
discussed any comments it received on the proposed rule change. The
text of these statements may be examined at the places specified in
Item IV below. The self-regulatory organization has prepared summaries,
set forth in sections A, B, and C below, of the most significant
aspects of such statements.

A. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement of the Purpose of, and
Statutory Basis for, the Proposed Rule Change

1. Purpose
    This proposed rule change is based on a filing previously submitted
by the Chicago Board Options Exchange (``CBOE'') that was effective on
filing.\5\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \5\ See Securities Exchange Act Release No. 60295 (July 13,
2009), 74 FR 35215 (July 20, 2009) (SR-CBOE-2009-49).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    ISE proposes to amend Rule 803 to eliminate the provision providing
for bids (offers) to be no more than $1 lower (higher) that the last
preceding transaction plus or minus the aggregate change in the last
sale price of the

underlying, and amend the provision pertaining to trades that are more
than $0.25 below parity. Rule 803, in part, provides that market makers
are expected ordinarily, except in unusual market conditions, not to
bid more than $1 lower or offer more than $1 higher that the last
preceding transaction price for the particular option contract plus or
minus the aggregate change in the last sale price of the underlying
security since the time of the last preceding transaction for the
particular option contract (the ``one point'' rule). In addition,
market makers are expected ordinarily, except in unusual market
conditions, to refrain from purchasing a call option or a put option at
a price more than $0.25 below parity. In the case of call options,
parity is measured by the bid in the underlying security, and in the
case of put options, parity is measured by the offer in the underlying
security (the ``parity'' rule).
    First, the Exchange proposes to eliminate the one point rule. The
one point rule has been in place at the Exchange since its
inception.\6\ Since that time, various market changes have rendered the
rule obsolete and unnecessary. For example, market makers are now
subject to various quotation requirements, including bid/ask quote
width requirements contained elsewhere in Rule 803. The Exchange also
has an obvious error rule that contains provisions on erroneous pricing
errors (e.g., Rule 720) and has in place certain price check parameters
that will not permit the automatic execution of certain orders if the
execution would take place at prices inferior to the national best bid/
offer (e.g., Rules 714(a), 721).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \6\ See Securities Exchange Act Release No. 42455 (February 24,
2000), 65 FR 11388 (March 2, 2000).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    Second, at this time the Exchange is proposing to retain the parity
rule, which has also been in place at the Exchange since its
inception,\7\ as a guideline but to modify it to provide that an amount
larger than $0.25 may be appropriate considering the particular market
conditions (not just unusual market conditions as the rule currently
states). The text will also be revised to provide that the $0.25
guideline may be increased, or the parity rule waived, by the Exchange
on a series-by-series basis. The Exchange believes that revising the
$0.25 parity rule in this manner modernizes the guideline to reflect
market changes (including those discussed above) and will provide more
flexibility to take into consideration the particular trading in a
security, including but not limited to the underlying market price,
market conditions, and applicable minimum bid/ask width requirements
for a given options series.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \7\ Id.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

2. Statutory Basis
    The Exchange believes the proposed rule change is consistent with
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (the ``Act'') \8\ and the rules and
regulations thereunder and, in particular, the requirements of Section
6(b) of the Act.\9\ Specifically, the Exchange believes the proposed
rule change is consistent with the Section 6(b)(5) \10\ requirements
that the rules of an exchange be designed to promote just and equitable
principles of trade, to prevent fraudulent and manipulative acts, to
remove impediments to and to perfect the mechanism for a free and open
market and a national market system, and, in general, to protect
investors and the public interest, because it will eliminate the
outdated one point rule and update the parity rule to incorporate more
flexibility and recognize changing market conditions.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \8\ 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(1).
    \9\ 15 U.S.C. 78(f)(b).
    \10\ 15 U.S.C. 78(f)(b)(5).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

B. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement on Burden on Competition

    The proposed rule change does not impose any burden on competition
that is not necessary or appropriate in furtherance of the purposes of
the Act.

C. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement on Comments on the Proposed
Rule Change Received From Members, Participants or Others

    The Exchange has not solicited, and does not intend to solicit,
comments on this proposed rule change. The Exchange has not received
any unsolicited written comments from members or other interested
parties.

III. Date of Effectiveness of the Proposed Rule Change and Timing for
Commission Action

    Because the foregoing proposed rule change: (1) Does not
significantly affect the protection of investors or the public
interest; (2) does not impose any significant burden on competition;
and (3) by its terms, does not become operative for 30 days after the
date of filing, or such shorter time as the Commission may designate if
consistent with the protection of investors and the public interest, it
has become effective pursuant to Section 19(b)(3)(A) \11\ of the Act
and Rule 19b-4(f)(6)(iii) \12\ thereunder.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \11\ 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(3)(A).
    \12\ 17 CFR 240.19b-4(f)(6)(iii). In addition, Rule 19b-
4(f)(6)(iii) requires the Exchange to give the Commission written
notice of the Exchange's intent to file the proposed rule change
along with a brief description and the text of the proposed rule
change, at least five business days prior to the date of filing of
the proposed rule change, or such shorter time as designated by the
Commission. The Exchange has satisfied the pre-filing requirement.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    At any time within 60 days of the filing of the proposed rule
change, the Commission may summarily abrogate such rule change if it
appears to the Commission that such action is necessary or appropriate
in the public interest, for the protection of investors, or otherwise
in furtherance of the purposes of the Act.\13\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \13\ 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(3)(C).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

IV. Solicitation of Comments

    Interested persons are invited to submit written data, views, and
arguments concerning the foregoing, including whether the proposed rule
change is consistent with the Act. Comments may be submitted by any of
the following methods:

Electronic Comments

     Use the Commission's Internet comment form (http://
www.sec.gov/rules/sro.shtml); or
     Send an e-mail to<EMAIL_ADDRESS>Please include
File Number SR-ISE-2009-85 on the subject line.

Paper Comments

     Send paper comments in triplicate to Elizabeth M. Murphy,
Secretary, Securities and Exchange Commission, 100 F Street, NE.,
Washington, DC 20549-1090.

All submissions should refer to File Number SR-ISE-2009-85. This file
number should be included on the subject line if e-mail is used. To
help the Commission process and review your comments more efficiently,
please use only one method. The Commission will post all comments on
the Commission's Internet Web site (http://www.sec.gov/rules/
sro.shtml). Copies of the submission, all subsequent amendments, all
written statements with respect to the proposed rule change that are
filed with the Commission, and all written communications relating to
the proposed rule change between the Commission and any person, other
than those that may be withheld from the public in accordance with the
provisions of 5 U.S.C. 552, will be available for inspection and
copying in the Commission's Public Reference Room, 100 F Street, NE.,
Washington,

DC 20549, on official business days between the hours of 10 a.m. and 3
p.m. Copies of such filing also will be available for inspection and
copying at the principal office of the Exchange. All comments received
will be posted without change; the Commission does not edit personal
identifying information from submissions. You should submit only
information that you wish to make available publicly. All submissions
should refer to File Number SR-ISE-2009-85 and should be submitted on
or before November 25, 2009.

    For the Commission, by the Division of Trading and Markets,
pursuant to delegated authority.\14\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \14\ 17 CFR 200.30-3(a)(12).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

Florence E. Harmon,
Deputy Secretary.
[FR Doc. E9-26509 Filed 11-3-09; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 8011-01-P


[Federal Register Volume 86, Number 160 (Monday, August 23, 2021)]
[Proposed Rules]
[Pages 47033-47035]
[FR Doc No: 2021-17949]

=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION

Federal Aviation Administration

14 CFR Part 39

[Docket No. FAA-2021-0687; Project Identifier 2019-SW-029-AD]
RIN 2120-AA64

Airworthiness Directives; Leonardo S.p.a. Helicopters

AGENCY: Federal Aviation Administration (FAA), DOT.

ACTION: Notice of proposed rulemaking (NPRM).

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The FAA proposes to adopt a new airworthiness directive (AD)
for certain Leonardo S.p.a. Model AW189 helicopters. This proposed AD
was prompted by a report that a number of fairleads that support the
engine combustion chamber D1 drain hose showed evidence of heat damage.
This proposed AD would require modifying the helicopter by installing a
certain engine combustion chamber D1 drain assembly, as specified in a
European Union Aviation Safety Agency (EASA) AD, which is proposed for
incorporation by reference (IBR). The FAA is proposing this AD to
address the unsafe condition on these products.

DATES: The FAA must receive comments on this proposed AD by October 7,
2021.

ADDRESSES: You may send comments, using the procedures found in 14 CFR
11.43 and 11.45, by any of the following methods:
     Federal eRulemaking Portal: Go to https://www.regulations.gov. Follow the instructions for submitting comments.
     Fax:<PHONE_NUMBER>.
     Mail: U.S. Department of Transportation, Docket
Operations, M-30, West Building Ground Floor, Room W12-140, 1200 New
Jersey Avenue SE, Washington, DC 20590.
     Hand Delivery: Deliver to Mail address above between 9
a.m. and 5 p.m., Monday through Friday, except Federal holidays.
    For EASA material that is proposed for IBR in this AD, contact
EASA, Konrad-Adenauer-Ufer 3, 50668 Cologne, Germany; telephone +49 221
8999 000; email<EMAIL_ADDRESS>internet www.easa.europa.eu. You
may find the EASA material on the EASA website at https://ad.easa.europa.eu. You may view this material at the FAA, Office of the
Regional Counsel, Southwest Region, 10101 Hillwood Pkwy., Room 6N-321,
Fort Worth, TX 76177. For information on the availability of this
material at the FAA, call<PHONE_NUMBER>. This material is also
available at https://www.regulations.gov by searching for and locating
Docket No. FAA-2021-0687.

Examining the AD Docket

    You may examine the AD docket at https://www.regulations.gov by
searching for and locating Docket No. FAA-2021-0687; or in person at
Docket Operations between 9 a.m. and 5 p.m., Monday through Friday,
except Federal holidays. The AD docket contains this NPRM, the EASA AD,
any comments received, and other information. The street address for
Docket Operations is listed above.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Jacob Fitch, Aerospace Engineer, COS
Program Management Section, Operational Safety Branch, Compliance &
Airworthiness Division, FAA, 10101 Hillwood Pkwy., Fort Worth, TX
76177; telephone<PHONE_NUMBER>; email<EMAIL_ADDRESS>
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

Comments Invited

    The FAA invites you to send any written relevant data, views, or
arguments about this proposal. Send your comments to an address listed
under ADDRESSES. Include ``Docket No. FAA-2021-0687; Project Identifier
2019-SW-029-AD'' at the beginning of your comments. The most helpful
comments reference a specific portion of the proposal, explain the
reason for any recommended change, and include supporting data. The FAA
will consider all comments received by the closing date and may amend
this proposal because of those comments.
    Except for Confidential Business Information (CBI) as described in
the following paragraph, and other information as described in 14 CFR
11.35, the FAA will post all comments received, without change, to
https://www.regulations.gov, including any personal information you
provide. The agency will also post a report summarizing each
substantive verbal contact received about this NPRM.

Confidential Business Information

    CBI is commercial or financial information that is both customarily
and actually treated as private by its owner. Under the Freedom of
Information Act (FOIA) (5 U.S.C. 552), CBI is exempt from public
disclosure. If your comments responsive to this NPRM contain commercial
or financial information that is customarily treated as private, that
you actually treat as private, and that is relevant or responsive to
this NPRM, it is important that you clearly designate the submitted
comments as CBI. Please mark each page of your submission containing
CBI as ``PROPIN.'' The FAA will treat such marked submissions as
confidential under the FOIA, and they will not be placed in the public
docket of this NPRM. Submissions containing CBI should be sent to Jacob
Fitch, Aerospace Engineer, COS Program Management Section, Operational
Safety Branch, Compliance & Airworthiness Division, FAA, 10101 Hillwood
Pkwy., Fort Worth, TX 76177; telephone<PHONE_NUMBER>; email
<EMAIL_ADDRESS>Any commentary that the FAA receives that is not
specifically designated as CBI will be placed in the public docket for
this rulemaking.

Background

    The EASA, which is the Technical Agent for the Member States of the
European Union, has issued EASA AD 2019-0039, dated February 20, 2019
(EASA AD 2019-0039), to correct an unsafe condition for certain
Leonardo S.p.A. Model AW189 helicopters.
    This proposed AD was prompted by a report that a number of
fairleads that support the engine combustion chamber D1 drain hose
showed evidence of heat damage. The FAA is proposing this AD to address
heat damage, which in a case where the right-hand engine is operated in
the one engine inoperative (OEI) rating, the D1 drain pipe could
transfer so much heat to the nearby fuel system vent pipe that its
internal surface temperature could exceed the auto-ignition temperature
for fuel. The unsafe condition, if not addressed, could result in
undetected fire ignition in the fuel tank bay with consequent loss of
the helicopter. See EASA AD 2019-0039 for additional background
information.

Related Service Information Under 1 CFR Part 51

    EASA AD 2019-0039 requires modifying the helicopter by installing
the engine combustion chamber D1 drain assembly, part number
8G7170P00111.
    This material is reasonably available because the interested
parties have access to it through their normal course of business or by
the means identified in the ADDRESSES section.

FAA's Determination

    This helicopter has been approved by EASA and is approved for
operation in the United States. Pursuant to the FAA's bilateral
agreement with the European Union, EASA has notified the FAA about the
unsafe condition described in its AD. The FAA is proposing this AD
after evaluating all known relevant information and determining that
the unsafe condition described previously is likely to exist or develop
on other helicopters of the same type design.

Proposed AD Requirements in This NPRM

    This proposed AD would require accomplishing the actions specified
in EASA AD 2019-0039, described previously, as incorporated by
reference, except for any differences identified as exceptions in the
regulatory text of this proposed AD.

Explanation of Required Compliance Information

    In the FAA's ongoing efforts to improve the efficiency of the AD
process, the FAA developed a process to use some civil aviation
authority (CAA) ADs as the primary source of information for compliance
with requirements for corresponding FAA ADs. The FAA has been
coordinating this process with manufacturers and CAAs. As a result, the
FAA proposes to incorporate EASA AD 2019-0039 by reference in the FAA
final rule. This proposed AD would, therefore, require compliance with
EASA AD 2019-0039 in its entirety through that incorporation, except
for any differences identified as exceptions in the regulatory text of
this proposed AD. Using common terms that are the same as the heading
of a particular section EASA AD 2019-0039 does not mean that operators
need comply only with that section. For example, where the AD
requirement refers to ``all required actions and compliance times,''
compliance with this AD requirement is not limited to the section
titled ``Required Action(s) and Compliance Time(s)'' in EASA AD 2019-
0039. Service information required by EASA AD 2019-0039 for compliance
will be available at https://www.regulations.gov by searching for and
locating Docket No. FAA-2021-0687 after the FAA final rule is
published.

Costs of Compliance

    The FAA estimates that this AD, if adopted as proposed, would
affect 4 helicopters of U.S. registry. The FAA estimates the following
costs to comply with this proposed AD:

                                                 Estimated Costs
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
                                                                                Cost per      Cost on U.S.
                Action                         Labor cost           Parts cost        product        operators
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Modification..........................  4 work-hours x $85 per            $2,557          $2,897         $11,588
                                         hour = $340.
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

    The FAA has included all known costs in its cost estimate.
According to the manufacturer, however, some or all of the costs of
this proposed AD may be covered under warranty, thereby reducing the
cost impact on affected operators.

Authority for This Rulemaking

    Title 49 of the United States Code specifies the FAA's authority to
issue rules on aviation safety. Subtitle I, section 106, describes the
authority of the FAA Administrator. Subtitle VII: Aviation Programs,
describes in more detail the scope of the Agency's authority.
    The FAA is issuing this rulemaking under the authority described in
Subtitle VII, Part A, Subpart III, Section 44701: General requirements.
Under that section, Congress charges the FAA with promoting safe flight
of civil aircraft in air commerce by prescribing regulations for
practices, methods, and procedures the Administrator finds necessary
for safety in air commerce. This regulation is within the scope of that
authority because it addresses an unsafe condition that is likely to
exist or develop on products identified in this rulemaking action.

Regulatory Findings

    The FAA determined that this proposed AD would not have federalism
implications under Executive Order 13132. This proposed AD would not
have a substantial direct effect on the States, on the relationship
between the national Government and the States, or on the distribution
of power and responsibilities among the various levels of government.
    For the reasons discussed above, I certify this proposed
regulation:
    (1) Is not a ``significant regulatory action'' under Executive
Order 12866,
    (2) Would not affect intrastate aviation in Alaska, and
    (3) Would not have a significant economic impact, positive or
negative, on a substantial number of small entities under the criteria
of the Regulatory Flexibility Act.

List of Subjects in 14 CFR Part 39

    Air transportation, Aircraft, Aviation safety, Incorporation by
reference, Safety.

The Proposed Amendment

    Accordingly, under the authority delegated to me by the
Administrator, the FAA proposes to amend 14 CFR part 39 as follows:

PART 39--AIRWORTHINESS DIRECTIVES

0
1. The authority citation for part 39 continues to read as follows:

    Authority:  49 U.S.C. 106(g), 40113, 44701.

Sec.  39.13   [Amended]

0
2. The FAA amends Sec.  39.13 by adding the following new airworthiness
directive:

Leonardo S.p.a.: Docket No. FAA-2021-0687; Project Identifier 2019-
SW-029-AD.

(a) Comments Due Date

    The FAA must receive comments on this airworthiness directive
(AD) by October 7, 2021.

(b) Affected ADs

    None.

(c) Applicability

    This AD applies to Leonardo S.p.a. Model AW189 helicopters,
certificated in any category, as identified in European Union
Aviation Safety Agency (EASA) AD 2019-0039, dated February 20, 2019
(EASA AD 2019-0039).

(d) Subject

    Joint Aircraft Service Component (JASC) Code: 7170, Engine
Drains.

(e) Unsafe Condition

    This AD was prompted by a report that a number of fairleads that
support the engine combustion chamber D1 drain hose showed evidence
of heat damage. The FAA is issuing this AD to address such heat
damage, which in a case where the right-hand engine is operated in
the one engine inoperative (OEI) rating, the D1 drain pipe could
transfer so much heat to the nearby fuel system vent pipe that its
internal surface temperature could exceed the auto-ignition
temperature for fuel. The unsafe condition, if not addressed, could
result in undetected fire ignition in the fuel tank bay with
consequent loss of the helicopter.

(f) Compliance

    Comply with this AD within the compliance times specified,
unless already done.

(g) Requirements

    Except as specified in paragraph (h) of this AD: Comply with all
required actions and compliance times specified in, and in
accordance with, EASA AD 2019-0039.

(h) Exceptions to EASA AD 2019-0039

    (1) Where EASA AD 2019-0039 requires compliance in terms of
flight hours, this AD requires using hours time-in-service.
    (2) Where EASA AD 2019-0039 refers to its effective date, this
AD requires using the effective date of this AD.
    (3) Where the service information required by EASA AD 2019-0039
specifies discarding parts, this AD requires removing those parts
from service.
    (4) This AD does not require the ``Remarks'' section of EASA AD
2019-0039.

(i) No Reporting Requirement

    Although the service information referenced in EASA AD 2019-0039
specifies to submit certain information to the manufacturer, this AD
does not include that requirement.

(j) Special Flight Permit

    Special flight permits may be issued in accordance with 14 CFR
21.197 and 21.199 to operate the airplane to a location where the
airplane can be modified, provided the OEI rating is prohibited on
the right-hand engine.

(k) Alternative Methods of Compliance (AMOCs)

    (1) The Manager, International Validation Branch, FAA, has the
authority to approve AMOCs for this AD, if requested using the
procedures found in 14 CFR 39.19. In accordance with 14 CFR 39.19,
send your request to your principal inspector or local Flight
Standards District Office, as appropriate. If sending information
directly to the manager of the International Validation Branch, send
it to the attention of the person identified in paragraph (l)(2) of
this AD. Information may be emailed to<EMAIL_ADDRESS>    (2) Before using any approved AMOC, notify your appropriate
principal inspector, or lacking a principal inspector, the manager
of the local flight standards district office/certificate holding
district office.

(l) Related Information

    (1) For EASA AD 2019-0039, contact EASA, Konrad-Adenauer-Ufer 3,
50668 Cologne, Germany; telephone +49 221 8999 000; email
<EMAIL_ADDRESS>internet www.easa.europa.eu. You may view this
material at the FAA, Office of the Regional Counsel, Southwest
Region, 10101 Hillwood Pkwy., Room 6N-321, Fort Worth, TX 76177. For
information on the availability of this material at the FAA, call
(817) 222-5110. This material may be found in the AD docket at
https://www.regulations.gov by searching for and locating Docket No.
FAA-2021-0687.
    (2) For more information about this AD, contact Jacob Fitch,
Aerospace Engineer, COS Program Management Section, Operational
Safety Branch, Compliance & Airworthiness Division, FAA, 10101
Hillwood Pkwy., Fort Worth, TX 76177; telephone<PHONE_NUMBER>;
email<EMAIL_ADDRESS>
    Issued on August 17, 2021.
Gaetano A. Sciortino,
Deputy Director for Strategic Initiatives, Compliance & Airworthiness
Division, Aircraft Certification Service.
[FR Doc. 2021-17949 Filed 8-20-21; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910-13-P


[Federal Register Volume 83, Number 10 (Tuesday, January 16, 2018)]
[Notices]
[Pages 2265-2268]
[FR Doc No: 2018-00529]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

[Release No. 34-82472; File No. SR-ISE-2018-03]

Self-Regulatory Organizations; Nasdaq ISE, LLC; Notice of Filing
and Immediate Effectiveness of Proposed Rule Change To Amend the Price
Level Protection Rule

January 9, 2018.
    Pursuant to Section 19(b)(1) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934
(``Act''),\1\ and Rule 19b-4 thereunder,\2\ notice is hereby given that
on January 2, 2018, Nasdaq ISE, LLC (``ISE'' or ``Exchange'') filed
with the Securities and Exchange Commission (``Commission'') the
proposed rule change as described in Items I and II below, which Items
have been prepared by the Exchange. The Commission is publishing this
notice to solicit comments on the proposed rule change from interested
persons.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \1\ 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(1).
    \2\ 17 CFR 240.19b-4.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

I. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement of the Terms of Substance
of the Proposed Rule Change

    The Exchange proposes to amend Rule 714(b)(4) (Price Level
Protection) to clarify the operation of the Price Level Protection.
    The text of the proposed rule change is available on the Exchange's
website at http://ise.cchwallstreet.com/, at the principal office of
the Exchange, and at the Commission's Public Reference Room.

II. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement of the Purpose of, and
Statutory Basis for, the Proposed Rule Change

    In its filing with the Commission, the Exchange included statements
concerning the purpose of and basis for the proposed rule change and
discussed any comments it received on the proposed rule change. The
text of these statements may be examined at the places specified in
Item IV below. The Exchange has prepared summaries, set forth in
sections A, B, and C below, of

the most significant aspects of such statements.

A. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement of the Purpose of, and
Statutory Basis for, the Proposed Rule Change

1. Purpose
    The purpose of the proposed rule change is to amend Rule 714(b)(4)
(Price Level Protection) to specify that the Price Level Protection:
(1) Only applies when there is no away market best bid or offer
(``ABBO''), (2) does not apply to quotes on the complex order book,
which are not eligible to trade with bids and offers for the component
legs, and (3) determines the maximum number of price levels by
reference to the component leg(s) where the protection has been
triggered. The proposed changes will increase transparency around the
operation of the Exchange with respect to the Price Level Protection,
and no changes to the Exchange's trading or other systems are being
proposed.
    Currently, Rule 714(b)(4), which applies to complex orders executed
on the Exchange, provides that ``[t]here is a limit on the number of
price levels at which an incoming order or quote to sell (buy) will be
executed automatically with the bids or offers of each component leg.''
Furthermore, as currently written, Rule 714(b)(4) also provides that
``orders and quotes are executed at each successive price level until
the maximum number of price levels is reached, and any balance is
canceled.'' The number of price levels for the component leg, which may
be between one (1) and ten (10), is determined by the Exchange from
time-to-time on a class-by-class basis.\3\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \3\ Currently, this limit is set to five price levels. The
Exchange will provide at least a two week notice to members via an
Options Trader Alert prior to changing the price level limit to
allow members the opportunity to perform any system changes. Any
change to the price level limit would be subject to consultations
with members.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    Previously, this rule, which applied to both simple and complex
orders executed on the Exchange, provided additionally that the
protection applied ``when there are no bids (offers) from other
exchanges at any price for the options series.'' This language was
inadvertently removed in SR-ISE-2017-03, when the Exchange adopted its
Acceptable Trade Range (``ATR'') protection for simple orders and
retained the Price Level Protection for complex orders in connection
with the migration of the Exchange's trading system to Nasdaq INET.\4\
The Exchange proposes to re-introduce this language to clarify that the
trading system continues to apply this protection only when there is no
ABBO available.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \4\ See Securities Exchange Act Release No. 80432 (April 11,
2017), 82 FR 18191 (April 17, 2017) (SR-ISE-2017-03) (Approval
Order).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    Furthermore, Rule 714(b)(4) also contains references to quotes that
were not removed when the Exchange filed SR-ISE-2017-03 to apply the
Price Level Protection solely to complex orders. Although the previous
version of the Price Level Protection for simple orders applied to both
orders and quotes, quotes have never been included in the Price Level
Protection for complex orders. Specifically, quotes are excluded from
the Price Level Protection for complex orders because quotes are not
permitted to leg into the regular market to trade with bids and offers
on the Exchange for the individual legs of the complex strategy.\5\
Because quotes on the complex order book do not leg into the regular
market, they are excluded from the Price Level Protection, which
applies when a complex order is executed with bids and offers for the
component legs of the complex strategy. The Exchange therefore proposes
to amend Rule 714(b)(4) by removing outdated references to quotes. In
addition, to further reinforce that the Price Level Protection applies
to complex orders and not simple orders, the Exchange also proposes to
add the word ``complex'' before references to orders contained in Rule
714(b)(4).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \5\ See Supplementary Material .03 to Rule 722.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    Finally, the Exchange proposes to add language to the rule that
specifies that complex orders are executed at each successive price
level until the maximum number of price levels is reached on a
component leg where the protection has been triggered. For example,
assume a member enters a complex order to buy 20 contracts of series A
and 20 contracts of series B. If there is no ABBO at any price in
series B and the complex order legs into the regular order book, the
complex order would be able to trade up to five price levels in series
B (e.g., $1.00, $1.05, $1.10, $1.15, and $1.20 but not $1.25 or
greater).\6\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \6\ See footnote 3 supra.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    The complex order would also trade with the corresponding number of
contracts of series A but there would be no restriction on the number
of price levels that could be traded in series A if there is sufficient
quantity available at the five price levels permitted to trade in
series B and the executions in series A are at or inside the ABBO for
the series (e.g., if the ABBO in series A is $1.30 and all 20 contracts
can be traded at permitted prices in series B, the corresponding 20
contracts in series A could be executed at $0.95, $1.00, $1.05, $1.10,
$1.15, $1.20, $1.25, and $1.30 without triggering the protection).
Although currently implied by the rule, the Exchange believes that it
is appropriate to explicitly reference that the number of price levels
is determined based on a component leg where the protection has been
triggered to avoid any potential member confusion. Although a complex
order that legs into the regular market must trade with all component
legs to satisfy the complex order, the Price Level Protection is
applied solely on component legs that trigger the protection--i.e.,
where there is no away market as discussed earlier in this proposed
rule change. As such, the maximum number of price levels discussed in
Rule 714(b)(4) is computed by reference to component legs where the
protection has been triggered.
2. Statutory Basis
    The Exchange believes that its proposal is consistent with Section
6(b) of the Act,\7\ in general, and furthers the objectives of Section
6(b)(5) of the Act,\8\ in particular, in that it is designed to promote
just and equitable principles of trade, to remove impediments to and
perfect the mechanism of a free and open market and a national market
system, and, in general to protect investors and the public interest.
The Exchange believes that the proposed rule change is consistent with
the protection of investors and the public interest as it will increase
transparency around the operation of the Exchange and, in particular,
the Price Level Protection for complex orders.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \7\ 15 U.S.C. 78f(b).
    \8\ 15 U.S.C. 78f(b)(5).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    The Price Level Protection is designed to ensure that complex
orders that leg into the regular order book and trade against bids and
offers for the component legs are protected from trading at
unreasonable prices when there is no away market. Thus, this protection
only applies when there are no bids (offers) from other exchanges at
any price for the options series, as stated in the previous version of
the rule. The Exchange believes that applying this protection when
there is no away market promotes just and equitable principles of trade
as executions are prevented only when there is no ABBO to establish
reasonable execution bounds. When there is an away market, the Exchange
believes that this

protection is not necessary, as executions on the regular order book,
including the execution of complex orders that leg in to access
liquidity on the bids and offers for the individual legs, must occur at
or inside the ABBO. The Exchange believes that it is appropriate to re-
introduce the proposed language described above so that members are
properly apprised of when the Price Level Protection will prevent the
execution of complex orders that leg into the regular order book.
    The proposed rule change also clarifies that the Price Level
Protection applies only to complex orders and not to quotes entered on
the complex order book. The Exchange believes that this change is
consistent with the protection of investors and the public interest
because quotes are not permitted to leg into the regular market \9\ and
therefore are not eligible to trigger the Price Level Protection, which
only affects complex orders that trade with bids and offers for the
component legs. The Exchange therefore believes that this change better
reflects functionality offered on the Exchange and will increase
transparency for members.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \9\ See Supplementary Material .03 to Rule 722.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    Finally, the proposed rule change makes clear that the maximum
number of price levels described in Rule 714(b)(4) is determined by
reference to component leg(s) where the protection is triggered.
Although all legs of a complex order must be executed in order for the
complex order to be traded, the Price Level Protection is designed to
prevent executions at unreasonable prices when there is no away market
in one or more component legs. As such, the maximum number of price
levels is determined by reference to the component leg(s) that trigger
the protection by virtue of there being no away market prices to
constrain executions in that particular options series. Once this limit
has been exceeded on a component leg where the protection has been
triggered, no further executions can take place, and any remaining
balance of the complex order is cancelled. The Exchange believes that
adding the proposed language will increase transparency and avoid
potential confusion about when a complex order that legs into the
regular market will trigger the Price Level Protection. The Exchange
therefore believes that this change is consistent with the protection
of investors and the public interest.

B. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement on Burden on Competition

    The Exchange does not believe that the proposed rule change will
impose any burden on competition not necessary or appropriate in
furtherance of the purposes of the Act. The proposed rule change would
increase transparency around the operation of the Exchange and, in
particular, the Price Level Protection by re-introducing inadvertently
deleted language about when the protection is triggered, eliminating
outdated references to quotes, and reinforcing that the maximum number
of price levels is determined by reference to the component leg(s) that
trigger the protection. The Exchange therefore believes that the
proposed rule change will have no impact on competition.

C. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement on Comments on the Proposed
Rule Change Received From Members, Participants, or Others

    No written comments were either solicited or received.

III. Date of Effectiveness of the Proposed Rule Change and Timing for
Commission Action

    Because the foregoing proposed rule change does not: (i)
Significantly affect the protection of investors or the public
interest; (ii) impose any significant burden on competition; and (iii)
become operative for 30 days from the date on which it was filed, or
such shorter time as the Commission may designate, it has become
effective pursuant to Section 19(b)(3)(A)(iii) of the Act \10\ and
subparagraph (f)(6) of Rule 19b-4 thereunder.\11\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \10\ 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(3)(A)(iii).
    \11\ 17 CFR 240.19b-4(f)(6). In addition, Rule 19b-4(f)(6)
requires a self-regulatory organization to give the Commission
written notice of its intent to file the proposed rule change at
least five business days prior to the date of filing of the proposed
rule change, or such shorter time as designated by the Commission.
The Exchange has satisfied this requirement.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    A proposed rule change filed pursuant to Rule 19b-4(f)(6) under the
Act \12\ normally does not become operative prior to 30 days after the
date of the filing. However, Rule 19b-4(f)(6)(iii) under the Act \13\
permits the Commission to designate a shorter time if such action is
consistent with the protection of investors and the public interest.
ISE has asked the Commission to waive the 30-day operative delay so
that it may implement the proposed rule change immediately. In support
of its request, ISE notes that the proposed rule change would clarify
the operation of the Exchange by re-introducing inadvertently deleted
rule language indicating that the Price Level Protection only applies
when there is no away market, eliminating outdated references to
quotes, and reinforcing that the maximum number of price levels is
determined by reference to the component leg(s) that trigger the
protection. The Commission believes that waiving the 30-day operative
delay is consistent with the protection of investors and the public
interest. By re-introducing inadvertently deleted rule language
indicating that the Price Level Protection applies only when there is
no ABBO, eliminating references to quotes, which do not execute against
the individual legs of a complex strategy, and indicating that the
maximum number of price levels is determined by reference to the
component leg(s) that trigger the protection, the proposal will correct
errors and provide additional clarity to the rule, thereby helping to
assure that ISE's rule clearly and accurately describes the operation
of the Price Level Protection. Accordingly, the Commission waives the
30-day operative delay and designates the proposed rule change
operative upon filing.\14\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \12\ 17 CFR 240.19b-4(f)(6).
    \13\ 17 CFR 240.19b-4(f)(6)(iii).
    \14\ For purposes only of waiving the 30-day operative delay,
the Commission has also considered the proposed rule's impact on
efficiency, competition, and capital formation. See 15 U.S.C.
78c(f).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    At any time within 60 days of the filing of the proposed rule
change, the Commission summarily may temporarily suspend such rule
change if it appears to the Commission that such action is: (i)
Necessary or appropriate in the public interest; (ii) for the
protection of investors; or (iii) otherwise in furtherance of the
purposes of the Act. If the Commission takes such action, the
Commission shall institute proceedings to determine whether the
proposed rule should be approved or disapproved.

IV. Solicitation of Comments

    Interested persons are invited to submit written data, views, and
arguments concerning the foregoing, including whether the proposed rule
change is consistent with the Act. Comments may be submitted by any of
the following methods:

Electronic Comments

     Use the Commission's internet comment form (http://www.sec.gov/rules/sro.shtml); or
     Send an email to [email protected]. Please include
File Number SR-ISE-2018-03 on the subject line.

Paper Comments

     Send paper comments in triplicate to Secretary, Securities
and Exchange Commission, 100 F Street NE, Washington, DC 20549-1090.

All submissions should refer to File Number SR-ISE-2018-03. This file
number should be included on the subject line if email is used. To help
the Commission process and review your comments more efficiently,
please use only one method. The Commission will post all comments on
the Commission's internet website (http://www.sec.gov/rules/sro.shtml).
Copies of the submission, all subsequent amendments, all written
statements with respect to the proposed rule change that are filed with
the Commission, and all written communications relating to the proposed
rule change between the Commission and any person, other than those
that may be withheld from the public in accordance with the provisions
of 5 U.S.C. 552, will be available for website viewing and printing in
the Commission's Public Reference Room, 100 F Street NE, Washington, DC
20549, on official business days between the hours of 10:00 a.m. and
3:00 p.m. Copies of the filing also will be available for inspection
and copying at the principal office of the Exchange. All comments
received will be posted without change. Persons submitting comments are
cautioned that we do not redact or edit personal identifying
information from comment submissions. You should submit only
information that you wish to make available publicly. All submissions
should refer to File Number SR-ISE-2018-03, and should be submitted on
or before February 6, 2018.

    For the Commission, by the Division of Trading and Markets,
pursuant to delegated authority.\15\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \15\ 17 CFR 200.30-3(a)(12) and (59).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

Eduardo A. Aleman,
Assistant Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2018-00529 Filed 1-12-18; 8:45 am]
 BILLING CODE 8011-01-P


[Federal Register Volume 79, Number 12 (Friday, January 17, 2014)]
[Notices]
[Pages 3199-3200]
[FR Doc No: 2014-00934]

=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY

[EPA-HQ-OAR-2007-0478; FRL-9905-57-OAR]

Proposed Information Collection Request; Comment Request;
Regulation of Fuels and Fuel Additives: Gasoline Volatility

AGENCY: Environmental Protection Agency (EPA).

ACTION: Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Environmental Protection Agency is planning to submit an
information collection request (ICR), Regulation of Fuels and Fuel
Additives: Gasoline Volatility (EPA ICR No. 1367.10, OMB control No.
2060-0178), to the Office of Management and Budget (OMB) for review and
approval in accordance with the Paperwork Reduction Act (PRA) (44
U.S.C. 3501 et seq.). Before doing so, EPA is soliciting public
comments on specific aspects of the proposed information collection as
described below. This is a proposed extension of the ICR, which is
currently approved through July 31, 2014. An Agency may not conduct or
sponsor and a person is not required to respond to a collection of
information unless it displays a currently valid OMB control number.

DATES: Comments must be submitted on or before March 18, 2014.

ADDRESSES: Submit your comments, referencing Docket ID No. EPA-HQ-OAR-
2007-0478, online using www.regulations.gov (our preferred method), by
email to<EMAIL_ADDRESS>or by mail to: EPA Docket Center,
Environmental Protection Agency, Mail Code 28221T, 1200 Pennsylvania
Ave. NW., Washington, DC 20460.
    EPA's policy is that all comments received will be included in the
public docket without change including any personal information
provided, unless the comment includes profanity, threats, information
claimed to be Confidential Business Information (CBI) or other
information whose disclosure is restricted by statute.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: James W. Caldwell, Compliance
Division, Office of Transportation and Air Quality, Mail Code 6406J,
Environmental Protection Agency, 1200 Pennsylvania Ave. NW.,
Washington, DC 20460; telephone number:<PHONE_NUMBER>; fax number:
(202) 343-2802; email address<EMAIL_ADDRESS>
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Supporting documents which explain in detail
the information that the EPA will

be collecting are available in the public docket for this ICR. The
docket can be viewed online at www.regulations.gov or in person at the
EPA Docket Center, WJC West, Room 3334, 1301 Constitution Ave. NW.,
Washington, DC. The telephone number for the Docket Center is 202-566-
1744. For additional information about EPA's public docket, visit
http://www.epa.gov/dockets.
    Pursuant to section 3506(c)(2)(A) of the PRA, EPA specifically
solicits comments and information to enable it to: (i) Evaluate whether
the proposed collection of information is necessary for the proper
performance of the functions of the Agency, including whether the
information will have practical utility; (ii) evaluate the accuracy of
the Agency's estimate of the burden of the proposed collection of
information, including the validity of the methodology and assumptions
used; (iii) enhance the quality, utility, and clarity of the
information to be collected; and (iv) minimize the burden of the
collection of information on those who are to respond, including
through the use of appropriate automated electronic, mechanical, or
other technological collection techniques or other forms of information
technology, e.g., permitting electronic submission of responses. EPA
will consider the comments received and amend the ICR as appropriate.
The final ICR package will then be submitted to OMB for review and
approval. At that time, EPA will issue another Federal Register notice
to announce the submission of the ICR to OMB and the opportunity to
submit additional comments to OMB.
    Abstract: Gasoline volatility, as measured by Reid Vapor Pressure
(RVP) in pounds per square inch (psi), is controlled in the spring and
summer in order to minimize evaporative hydrocarbon emissions from
motor vehicles. RVP is subject to a federal standard of 7.8 psi or 9.0
psi, depending on location. The addition of ethanol to gasoline
increases the RVP by about 1 psi. Gasoline that contains 9 volume
percent to 10 volume percent ethanol is subject to a standard that is
1.0 psi greater. As an aid to industry compliance and EPA enforcement,
the product transfer document (PTD), which is prepared by the producer
or importer and which accompanies a shipment of gasoline containing
ethanol, is required by regulation to contain a legible and conspicuous
statement that the gasoline contains ethanol and the percentage
concentration of ethanol. This is intended to deter the mixing within
the distribution system, particularly in retail storage tanks, of
gasoline with ethanol in the 9 percent to 10 percent range with
gasoline which does not contain ethanol in that range. Such mixing
would likely result in a gasoline which is in violation of its RVP
standard. Also, a party wishing a testing exemption for research on
gasoline that is not in compliance with the applicable volatility
standard must submit certain information to EPA. EPA has additional PTD
requirements for gasoline containing ethanol at 40 CFR 80.1503. Those
requirements are covered in a separate ICR.
    Form Numbers: None.
    Respondents/affected entities: Entities potentially affected by
this action are those who produce or import gasoline containing
ethanol, or who wish to obtain a testing exemption.
    Respondent's obligation to respond: Mandatory per 40 CFR 80.27(d)
and (e).
    Estimated number of respondents: 2,000.
    Frequency of response: On occasion.
    Total estimated burden: 12,330 hours per year. Burden is defined at
5 CFR 1320.03(b).
    Total estimated cost: $1.1 million, includes $20 annualized capital
or operation & maintenance costs.
    Changes in Estimates: There is no change in the hours in the total
estimated respondent burden compared with the ICR currently approved by
OMB. The use of ethanol in gasoline has increased slightly, but that
has been offset by a slight decrease in gasoline consumption.

    Dated: January 13, 2014.
Byron J. Bunker,
Director, Compliance Division, Office of Transportation and Air
Quality, Office of Air and Radiation.
[FR Doc. 2014-00934 Filed 1-16-14; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6560-50-P


[Federal Register Volume 87, Number 79 (Monday, April 25, 2022)]
[Notices]
[Pages 24382-24384]
[FR Doc No: 2022-08681]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

[Release No. 34-94750; File No. SR-CboeEDGX-2022-024]

Self-Regulatory Organizations; Cboe EDGX Exchange, Inc.; Notice
of Filing and Immediate Effectiveness of a Proposed Rule Change To
Extend the Current Pilot Program Related to EDGX Rule 11.15, Clearly
Erroneous Executions, to the Close of Business on July 20, 2022

April 19, 2022.
    Pursuant to Section 19(b)(1) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934
(the ``Act''),\1\ and Rule 19b-4 thereunder,\2\ notice is hereby given
that on April 18, 2022, Cboe EDGX Exchange, Inc. (the ``Exchange'' or
``EDGX'') filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the
``Commission'') the proposed rule change as described in Items I and II
below, which Items have been prepared by the Exchange. The Exchange
filed the proposal as a ``non-controversial'' proposed rule change
pursuant to Section 19(b)(3)(A)(iii) of the Act \3\ and Rule 19b-
4(f)(6) thereunder.\4\ The Commission is publishing this notice to
solicit comments on the proposed rule change from interested persons.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \1\ 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(1).
    \2\ 17 CFR 240.19b-4.
    \3\ 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(3)(A)(iii).
    \4\ 17 CFR 240.19b-4(f)(6).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

I. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement of the Terms of Substance
of the Proposed Rule Change

    Cboe EDGX Exchange, Inc. (``EDGX'' or the ``Exchange'') is filing
with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the ``Commission'') a
proposed rule change to extend the current pilot program related to
EDGX Rule 11.15, Clearly Erroneous Executions, to the close of business
on July 20, 2022. The text of the proposed rule change is provided in
Exhibit 5.
    The text of the proposed rule change is also available on the
Exchange's website (http://markets.cboe.com/us/options/regulation/rule_filings/edgx/), at the Exchange's Office of the Secretary, and at
the Commission's Public Reference Room.

II. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement of the Purpose of, and
Statutory Basis for, the Proposed Rule Change

    In its filing with the Commission, the Exchange included statements
concerning the purpose of and basis for the proposed rule change and
discussed any comments it received on the

proposed rule change. The text of these statements may be examined at
the places specified in Item IV below. The Exchange has prepared
summaries, set forth in sections A, B, and C below, of the most
significant aspects of such statements.

A. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement of the Purpose of, and
Statutory Basis for, the Proposed Rule Change

1. Purpose
    The purpose of this filing is to extend the effectiveness of the
Exchange's current rule applicable to Clearly Erroneous Executions to
the close of business on July 20, 2022. Portions of Rule 11.15,
explained in further detail below, are currently operating as a pilot
program set to expire on April 20, 2022.\5\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \5\ See Securities Exchange Act Release No. 93345 (October 15,
2021), 86 FR 58368 (October 21, 2021) (SR-CboeEDGX-2021-045).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    On September 10, 2010, the Commission approved, on a pilot basis,
changes to EDGX Rule 11.15 that, among other things: (i) Provided for
uniform treatment of clearly erroneous execution reviews in multi-stock
events involving twenty or more securities; and (ii) reduced the
ability of the Exchange to deviate from the objective standards set
forth in the rule.\6\ In 2013, the Exchange adopted a provision
designed to address the operation of the Plan.\7\ Finally, in 2014, the
Exchange adopted two additional provisions providing that: (i) A series
of transactions in a particular security on one or more trading days
may be viewed as one event if all such transactions were effected based
on the same fundamentally incorrect or grossly misinterpreted issuance
information resulting in a severe valuation error for all such
transactions; and (ii) in the event of any disruption or malfunction in
the operation of the electronic communications and trading facilities
of an Exchange, another SRO, or responsible single plan processor in
connection with the transmittal or receipt of a trading halt, an
Officer, acting on his or her own motion, shall nullify any transaction
that occurs after a trading halt has been declared by the primary
listing market for a security and before such trading halt has
officially ended according to the primary listing market.\8\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \6\ See Securities Exchange Act Release No. 62886 (September 10,
2010), 75 FR 56613 (September 16, 2010) (SR-EDGX-2010-03).
    \7\ See Securities Exchange Act Release No. 68814 (February 1,
2013), 78 FR 9086 (February 7, 2013) (SR-EDGX-2013-06).
    \8\ See Securities Exchange Act Release No. 72434 (June 19,
2014), 79 FR 36110 (June 25, 2014) (SR-EDGX-2014-12).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    On December 26, 2018, the Commission published the proposed
Eighteenth Amendment \9\ to the Plan to Address Extraordinary Market
Volatility Pursuant to Rule 608 of Regulation NMS under the Act (the
``Limit Up-Limit Down Plan'' or the ``Plan'') \10\ to allow the Plan to
operate on a permanent, rather than pilot, basis. On April 8, 2019, the
Exchange amended EDGX Rule 11.15 to untie the pilot program's
effectiveness from that of the Plan and to extend the pilot's
effectiveness to the close of business on October 18, 2019 in order
allow the Exchange and other national securities exchanges additional
time to consider further amendments, if any, to the clearly erroneous
execution rules in light of the proposed Eighteenth Amendment to the
Plan.\11\ On April 17, 2019, the Commission published an approval of
the Eighteenth Amendment to allow the Plan to operate on a permanent,
rather than pilot, basis.\12\ On October 21, 2019, the Exchange amended
EDGX Rule 11.15 to extend the pilot's effectiveness to the close of
business on April 20, 2020.\13\ On March 18, 2020, the Exchange amended
EDGX Rule 11.15 to extend the pilot's effectiveness to the close of
business on October 20, 2020.\14\ On October 20, 2020, the Exchange
amended EDGX Rule 11.15 to extend the pilot's effectiveness to the
close of business on April 20, 2021.\15\ On April 14, 2021 the Exchange
amended EDGX Rule 11.15 to extend the pilot's effectiveness to the
close of business on October 20, 2021.\16\ Finally, on October 15, 2021
the Exchange amended EDGX Rule 11.15 to extend the pilot's
effectiveness to the close of business on April 20, 2022.\17\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \9\ See Securities Exchange Act Release No. 84843 (December 18,
2018), 83 FR 66464 (December 26, 2018) (File No. 4-631)
(``Eighteenth Amendment'').
    \10\ See Securities Exchange Act Release No. 67091 (May 31,
2012), 77 FR 33498 (June 6, 2012) (the ``Limit Up-Limit Down
Release'').
    \11\ See Securities Exchange Act Release No. 87364 (April 10,
2019), 84 FR 15652 (April 16, 2019) (SR-CboeEDGX-2019-018).
    \12\ See Securities Exchange Act Release No. 85623 (Apr. 11,
2019), 84 FR 16086 (Apr. 17, 2019) (File No. 4-631).
    \13\ See Securities Exchange Act Release No. 87367 (October 21,
2019), 84 FR 57519 (October 25, 2019) (SR-CboeEDGX-2019-062).
    \14\ See Securities Exchange Act Release No. 88500 (March 27,
2020), 85 FR 18628 (April 2, 2020) (SR-CboeEDGX-2020-013).
    \15\ See Securities Exchange Act Release No. 90233 (October 20,
2020), 85 FR 67787 (October 26, 2020) (SR-CboeEDGX-2020-051).
    \16\ See Securities Exchange Act Release No. 91554 (April 14,
2021), 86 FR 20567 (April 20, 2021) (SR-CboeEDGX-2021-019).
    \17\ Supra note 5.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    Other self-regulatory organizations (``SROs''), including the
Exchange, have worked on a proposed rule change to make the pilot rules
permanent. Cboe BZX Exchange, Inc., (``BZX'') filed such a proposed
rule change on March 7, 2022.\18\ The Exchange now proposes to amend
EDGX Rule 11.15 to extend the pilot's effectiveness an additional three
months to the close of business on July 20, 2022 while the Commission
considers the BZX proposal. The Exchange understands that the other
national securities exchanges and Financial Industry Regulatory
Authority (``FINRA'') have filed or plan to file similar proposals to
extend their respective clearly erroneous execution pilot programs, the
substance of which are identical to EDGX Rule 11.15. The Exchange does
not propose any additional changes to EDGX Rule 11.15. The Exchange
believes the benefits to market participants from the more objective
clearly erroneous executions rule should continue on a limited three
month pilot basis.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \18\ See Securities Exchange Act Release No. 94374 (March 7,
2022), 87 FR 14062 (March 11, 2022) (SR-CboeBZX-2022-017).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

2. Statutory Basis
    The Exchange believes the proposed rule change is consistent with
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (the ``Act'') and the rules and
regulations thereunder applicable to the Exchange and, in particular,
the requirements of Section 6(b) of the Act.\19\ Specifically, the
Exchange believes the proposed rule change is consistent with the
Section 6(b)(5) \20\ requirements that the rules of an exchange be
designed to prevent fraudulent and manipulative acts and practices, to
promote just and equitable principles of trade, to foster cooperation
and coordination with persons engaged in regulating, clearing,
settling, processing information with respect to, and facilitating
transactions in securities, to remove impediments to and perfect the
mechanism of a free and open market and a national market system, and,
in general, to protect investors and the public interest. Additionally,
the Exchange believes the proposed rule change is consistent with the
Section 6(b)(5) \21\ requirement that the rules of an exchange not be
designed to permit unfair discrimination between customers, issuers,
brokers, or dealers.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \19\ 15 U.S.C. 78f(b).
    \20\ 15 U.S.C. 78f(b)(5).
    \21\ Id.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    In particular, the Exchange believes that extending the clearly
erroneous

execution pilot under EDGX Rule 11.15 for an additional three months
would help assure that the determination of whether a clearly erroneous
trade has occurred will be based on clear and objective criteria, and
that the resolution of the incident will occur promptly through a
transparent process. The proposed rule change would also help assure
consistent results in handling erroneous trades across the U.S.
equities markets, thus furthering fair and orderly markets, the
protection of investors and the public interest. Based on the
foregoing, the Exchange believes the amended clearly erroneous
executions rule should continue to be in effect on a pilot basis while
the Exchange and the other national securities exchanges consider and
develop a permanent proposal for clearly erroneous execution reviews.

B. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement on Burden on Competition

    The Exchange does not believe that the proposed rule change would
impose any burden on competition that is not necessary or appropriate
in furtherance of the purposes of the Act. To the contrary, the
Exchange understands that FINRA and other national securities exchanges
have or will also file similar proposals to extend their respective
clearly erroneous execution pilot programs. Thus, the proposed rule
change will help to ensure consistency across market centers without
implicating any competitive issues.

C. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement on Comments on the Proposed
Rule Change Received From Members, Participants, or Others

    Written comments were neither solicited nor received.

III. Date of Effectiveness of the Proposed Rule Change and Timing for
Commission Action

    The Exchange has filed the proposed rule change pursuant to Section
19(b)(3)(A)(iii) of the Act \22\ and Rule 19b-4(f)(6) thereunder.\23\
Because the foregoing proposed rule change does not: (i) Significantly
affect the protection of investors or the public interest; (ii) impose
any significant burden on competition; and (iii) become operative for
30 days from the date on which it was filed, or such shorter time as
the Commission may designate, it has become effective pursuant to
Section 19(b)(3)(A)(iii) of the Act \24\ and subparagraph (f)(6) of
Rule 19b-4 thereunder.\25\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \22\ 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(3)(A)(iii).
    \23\ 17 CFR 240.19b-4(f)(6).
    \24\ 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(3)(A)(iii).
    \25\ 17 CFR 240.19b-4(f)(6). In addition, Rule 19b-4(f)(6)(iii)
requires a self-regulatory organization to give the Commission
written notice of its intent to file the proposed rule change, along
with a brief description and text of the proposed rule change, at
least five business days prior to the date of filing of the proposed
rule change, or such shorter time as designated by the Commission.
The Commission has waived the five-day prefiling requirement in this
case.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    A proposed rule change filed under Rule 19b-4(f)(6) \26\ normally
does not become operative prior to 30 days after the date of the
filing. However, pursuant to Rule 19b-4(f)(6)(iii),\27\ the Commission
may designate a shorter time if such action is consistent with the
protection of investors and the public interest. The Exchange asked
that the Commission waive the 30-day operative delay so that the
proposal may become operative immediately upon filing. Waiver of the
30-day operative delay would extend the protections provided by the
current pilot program, without any changes, while the Exchange and
other self-regulatory organizations consider whether further amendments
to these rules are appropriate. Therefore, the Commission hereby waives
the 30-day operative delay and designates the proposed rule change as
operative upon filing.\28\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \26\ 17 CFR 240.19b-4(f)(6).
    \27\ 17 CFR 240.19b-4(f)(6)(iii).
    \28\ For purposes only of waiving the 30-day operative delay,
the Commission has also considered the proposed rule's impact on
efficiency, competition, and capital formation. See 15 U.S.C.
78c(f).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    At any time within 60 days of the filing of the proposed rule
change, the Commission summarily may temporarily suspend such rule
change if it appears to the Commission that such action is necessary or
appropriate in the public interest, for the protection of investors, or
otherwise in furtherance of the purposes of the Act. If the Commission
takes such action, the Commission shall institute proceedings to
determine whether the proposed rule should be approved or disapproved.

IV. Solicitation of Comments

    Interested persons are invited to submit written data, views and
arguments concerning the foregoing, including whether the proposed rule
change is consistent with the Act. Comments may be submitted by any of
the following methods:

Electronic Comments

     Use the Commission's internet comment form (http://www.sec.gov/rules/sro.shtml); or
     Send an email to [email protected]. Please include
File Number SR-CboeEDGX-2022-024 on the subject line.

Paper Comments

     Send paper comments in triplicate to Secretary, Securities
and Exchange Commission, 100 F Street NE, Washington, DC 20549-1090.

All submissions should refer to File Number SR-CboeEDGX-2022-024. This
file number should be included on the subject line if email is used. To
help the Commission process and review your comments more efficiently,
please use only one method. The Commission will post all comments on
the Commission's internet website (http://www.sec.gov/rules/sro.shtml).
Copies of the submission, all subsequent amendments, all written
statements with respect to the proposed rule change that are filed with
the Commission, and all written communications relating to the proposed
rule change between the Commission and any person, other than those
that may be withheld from the public in accordance with the provisions
of 5 U.S.C. 552, will be available for website viewing and printing in
the Commission's Public Reference Room, 100 F Street NE, Washington, DC
20549, on official business days between the hours of 10:00 a.m. and
3:00 p.m. Copies of such filing also will be available for inspection
and copying at the principal office of the Exchange. All comments
received will be posted without change. Persons submitting comments are
cautioned that we do not redact or edit personal identifying
information from comment submissions. You should submit only
information that you wish to make available publicly. All submissions
should refer to File Number SR-CboeEDGX-2022-024 and should be
submitted on or before May 16, 2022.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \29\ 17 CFR 200.30-3(a)(12).

    For the Commission, by the Division of Trading and Markets,
pursuant to delegated authority.\29\
J. Matthew DeLesDernier,
Assistant Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2022-08681 Filed 4-22-22; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 8011-01-P


Cooling Water Intake Structure ( CWIS) Information Data Required Rig Information Rig Name Noble Homer Ferrington Rig Type Semisubmersible Total Installed Power Generation Capacity 10,000HP Number of Cooling Water Intake Structures ( CWISs) 2 Brief description of each CWIS ( e. g., sea chest, simple pipe) 2 seachests Rough dimensions of each CWIS and indicate whether onboard CWIS has an existing flange 36" diameter plate w/ 241  1   holes Screen type ( e. g., strainer, wedge wire) with mesh size Duplex basket strainers Total Design Specifications for Daily Maximum Water Intake Volume of each CWIS 1,008,000 gals ( 24,000 bbls)

Total Daily Water Intake Volume of each CWIS ( Set up/ Drilling) 1,008,000 gals ( 24,000 bbls)

Design Specs for Through Screen Velocity of each CWIS ( i. e., Q= V* A) ( Set up/ Drilling) 3.2 ft. per second List of Purposes of Cooling Water Intakes ( e. g., cool crude oil, produced water, power generators, drill pipe brakes) Winch cooling, Brake Water Cooling, High Pressure Unit, Compressors List of Purposes of Non cooling Water Intakes ( e. g., fire water, hotel loads) Fire pump, Sanitary, Ballast Water, Watermakers, Mud pits.

Total Volume of Water Intake for Ballasting, Duration of the Ballast intake, and the Through Screen Velocity of the Ballast intake 2,675,358 gal ( 63,699 bbls) Ballast Water Thru screen velocity = 26.0 fps Mitigation Measures for reducing Exotic Species Migration through Ballast water The rig does not carry much ballast water from location to location. It is taken on and dumped at the same location. Mitigation Measures for reducing Impingement and Entrainment of Aquatic Organisms, as well as Bio fouling Prevention Measures Sea screens, duplex and simplex baxkets, low voltage impressed current cathodic protection.

Is the Rig equipped with a Radiator Cooling System for the Main Engines? Yes


[Federal Register Volume 83, Number 143 (Wednesday, July 25, 2018)]
[Notices]
[Pages 35295-35296]
[FR Doc No: 2018-15852]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

Submission for OMB Review; Comment Request

Upon Written Request, Copies Available From: Securities and Exchange
Commission, Office of FOIA Services, 100 F Street NE, Washington, DC
20549-2736

Extension:
    Rule 24b-1; SEC File No. 270-205; OMB Control No. 3235-0194

    Notice is hereby given that pursuant to the Paperwork Reduction Act
of 1995 (44 U.S.C. 3501 et seq.), the Securities

and Exchange Commission (``Commission'') has submitted to the Office of
Management and Budget (``OMB'') a request for approval of extension of
the existing collection of information provided for in the following
rule: Rule 24b-1 (17 CFR 240.24b-1).
    Rule 24b-1 under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78a
et seq.) requires a national securities exchange to keep and make
available for public inspection a copy of its registration statement
and exhibits filed with the Commission, along with any amendments
thereto.
    There are 21 national securities exchanges that spend approximately
one half hour each complying with this rule, for an aggregate total
compliance burden of 10.5 hours per year. The staff estimates that the
average cost per respondent is $65.18 per year, calculated as the costs
of copying ($13.97) plus storage ($51.21), resulting in a total cost of
compliance for the respondents of $1,368.78
    An agency may not conduct or sponsor, and a person is not required
to respond to, a collection of information under the PRA unless it
displays a currently valid OMB control number.
    The public may view background documentation for this information
collection at the following website: www.reginfo.gov. Comments should
be directed to: (i) Desk Officer for the Securities and Exchange
Commission, Office of Information and Regulatory Affairs, Office of
Management and Budget, Room 10102, New Executive Office Building,
Washington, DC 20503, or by sending an email to:
[email protected]; and (ii) Pamela Dyson, Director/Chief
Information Officer, Securities and Exchange Commission, c/o Candace
Kenner, 100 F Street NE, Washington, DC 20549, or by sending an email
to: [email protected]. Comments must be submitted to OMB within 30
days of this notice.

    Dated: July 19, 2018.
Eduardo A. Aleman,
Assistant Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2018-15852 Filed 7-24-18; 8:45 am]
 BILLING CODE 8011-01-P


[Federal Register Volume 77, Number 216 (Wednesday, November 7, 2012)]
[Notices]
[Pages 66824-66825]
[FR Doc No: 2012-27179]

=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission

[Project No. 2004-287]

City of Holyoke Gas and Electric Department; Notice of
Application Accepted for Filing, Soliciting Comments, Motions To
Intervene, and Protests

    Take notice that the following hydroelectric application has been
filed with the Commission and is available for public inspection:
    a. Type of Application: Amendment of License.
    b. Project No.: 2004-287.
    c. Date Filed: August 31, 2012.
    d. Applicant: City of Holyoke Gas and Electric Department.
    e. Name of Project: Holyoke Project.
    f. Location: On the Connecticut River in Hampden, Hampshire, and
Franklin Counties, Massachusetts.
    g. Filed Pursuant to: Federal Power Act, 16 U.S.C. 791a-825r.
    h. Applicant Contact: Mr. Paul Ducheney, Superintendent, Holyoke
Gas and Electric Department, 99 Suffolk Street, Holyoke, MA 01040. Tel:
(413) 536-9340.

    i. FERC Contact: Ms. Andrea Claros,<PHONE_NUMBER>,
<EMAIL_ADDRESS>    j. Deadline for filing comments, motions to intervene, and
protests, is 30 days from the issuance date of this notice. All
documents may be filed electronically via the Internet. See, 18 CFR
385.2001(a)(1)(iii) and the instructions on the Commission's web site
at http://www.ferc.gov/docs-filing/efiling.asp. If unable to be filed
electronically, documents may be paper-filed. To paper-file, an
original and seven copies should be mailed to: The Secretary, Federal
Energy Regulatory Commission, 888 First Street NE., Washington, DC
20426. Commenters can submit brief comments up to 6,000 characters,
without prior registration, using the eComment system at http://www.ferc.gov/docs-filing/ecomment.asp. You must include your name and
contact information at the end of your comments.
    Please include the project numbers (P-2004-287) on any comments,
motions, or protests filed.
    k. Description of Request: The licensee proposes to enhance
downstream fish passage facilities at the project by the installation
of a new bar rack and associated facilities at the Hadley Falls
Station, and enhance the existing upstream fish passage facilities at
the project by making modifications to the spillway fishlift entrance.
The licensee further proposes to do an in-kind replacement of the
Hadley Unit 1 turbine concurrent with the downstream passage
construction work. The new unit would increase the project's installed
capacity by 600 kilowatts, and increase the maximum hydraulic capacity
by an estimated 320 cubic feet per second.
    l. Locations of the Application: A copy of the application is
available for inspection and reproduction at the Commission's Public
Reference Room, located at 888 First Street NE., Room 2A, Washington,
DC 20426, or by calling<PHONE_NUMBER>. This filing may also be viewed
on the Commission's Web site at http://www.ferc.gov/docs-filing/elibrary.asp. Enter the docket number excluding the last three digits
in the docket number field to access the document. You may also
register online at http://www.ferc.gov/docs-filing/esubscription.asp to
be notified via email of new filings and issuances related to this or
other pending projects. For assistance, call 1-866-208-3676 or email
<EMAIL_ADDRESS>for TTY, call<PHONE_NUMBER>. A copy is
also available for inspection and reproduction at the address in item
(h) above.
    m. Individuals desiring to be included on the Commission's mailing
list should so indicate by writing to the Secretary of the Commission.
    n. Comments, Protests, or Motions to Intervene: Anyone may submit
comments, a protest, or a motion to intervene in accordance with the
requirements of Rules of Practice and Procedure, 18 CFR 385.210, .211,
.214. In determining the appropriate action to take, the Commission
will consider all protests or other comments filed, but only those who
file a motion to intervene in accordance with the Commission's Rules
may become a party to the proceeding. Any comments, protests, or
motions to intervene must be received on or before the specified
comment date for the particular application.
    o. Filing and Service of Responsive Documents: Any filing must (1)
bear in all capital letters the title ``COMMENTS'', ``PROTEST'', or
``MOTION TO INTERVENE'' as applicable; (2) set forth in the heading the
name of the applicant and the project number of the application to
which the filing responds; (3) furnish the name, address, and telephone
number of the person protesting or intervening; and (4) otherwise
comply with the requirements of 18 CFR 385.2001 through 385.2005. All
comments, motions to intervene, or protests must set forth their
evidentiary basis and otherwise comply with the requirements of 18 CFR
4.34(b). All comments, motions to intervene, or protests should relate
to project works which are the subject of the license amendment.
Agencies may obtain copies of the application directly from the
applicant. A copy of any protest or motion to intervene must be served
upon each representative of the applicant specified in the particular
application. If an intervener files comments or documents with the
Commission relating to the merits of an issue that may affect the
responsibilities of a particular resource agency, they must also serve
a copy of the document on that resource agency. A copy of all other
filings in reference to this application must be accompanied by proof
of service on all persons listed in the service list prepared by the
Commission in this proceeding, in accordance with 18 CFR 4.34(b) and
385.2010.

    Dated: November 1, 2012.
Kimberly D. Bose,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2012-27179 Filed 11-6-12; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6717-01-P