SEQ CHAPTER \h \r 1

	JUN 6 2002

Mr. James L. Bacon

Department of the Army

Program Manager for Chemical Demilitarization

Aberdeen Proving Ground, MD  21010-5401

Dear Mr. Bacon:

	The National Program Chemicals Division (NPCD) of the U.S.
Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) hereby grants approval to the
Department of the Army (Army) to dispose of polychlorinated biphenyls
(PCBs).  This approval, entitled "Approval to Dispose of Polychlorinated
Biphenyls (PCBs)," permits the Department of the Army to incinerate M55
chemical agent rockets containing PCBs, using the Deactivation Furnace
Systems (DFS) in its Tooele Chemical Agent Disposal Facility (TOCDF)
located in the Deseret Chemical Depot, Tooele, Utah, and in DFSs to be
operational in the Anniston Chemical Agent Disposal Facility (ANCDF),
Anniston Army Depot, Anniston, Alabama; Pine Bluff Chemical Agent
Disposal Facility (PBCDF), Pine Bluff Arsenal, Pine Bluff, Arkansas; and
Umatilla Chemical Agent Disposal  Facility (UMCDF), Umatilla Chemical
Depot, near Hermiston, Oregon. This nationwide approval is issued
pursuant to Section 6(e)(1) of the Toxic Substances Control Act (TSCA)
of 1976 (Public Law 94-469), and the Federal PCB Regulations, 40 CFR
Part 761.70, and subject to conditions specified in this approval.
Effective dates for the approval are from April 1, 2002 through March
31, 2007.

	EPA believes that it is important to allow opportunities for public
participation in the process of approving these chemical agent weapons
disposal units.  EPA has held several public meetings in the community
surrounding the Tooele, Utah, facility.  An initial public meeting was
held on August 9, 2001, in Anniston, Alabama.  Likewise, EPA will hold
initial public meetings in Pine Bluff, Arkansas, and Hermiston, Oregon,
where interested parties may present oral or written comments on this
approval document, as well as available data from the Utah and Alabama
facilities.  EPA will hold additional public meetings in Alabama,
Arkansas and Oregon to receive comments on the trial burn data from each
respective facility.  EPA may modify the terms and conditions of this
approval as a result of this public participation process.

	PMCD shall not begin M55 rocket disposal operations with firing tubes
containing 50 ppm PCBs or greater at ANCDF, PBCDF and UMCDF (CDFs) or
Interim Operations without a letter from EPA NPCD authorizing each CDF
to dispose of PCBs during the shakedown operations.  Condition 1.c of
this approval provides details.

	This Approval to Dispose of PCBs is based on the results from the TOCDF
Trial Burn II completed in November 1998, in which the TSCA incinerator
requirement for 99.9999% destruction and removal efficiency (six 9s DRE)
was achieved.  This approval identifies the Army, represented by the
Program Manager for Chemical Demilitarization (PMCD) as the owner of the
TOCDF at the Deseret Chemical Depot, Utah; the Anniston Chemical Agent
Disposal Facility, Alabama; Pine Bluff Chemical Agent Disposal Facility,
Arkansas; and Umatilla Chemical Agent Disposal Facility, Oregon.  EG&G
is the operator of the DFS at the TOCDF; Raytheon Demilitarization
Company at UMCDF and PBCDF; and Westinghouse Government Environmental
Services Company LLC at ANCDF.

	Based on trial burns conducted at the TOCDF, Deseret Chemical Depot,
Utah and the Johnston Atoll Chemical Agent Disposal System (JACADS),
Johnston Atoll, Pacific Island, EPA concludes that as part of the RCRA
Trial Burns, sampling for PCBs is necessary at each DFS facility to be
constructed and operated.  Both facilities (JACADS and TOCDF)
experienced difficulties demonstrating that they consistently achieved
the PCB incinerator destruction and removal efficiency (DRE) performance
standards.  Therefore, prior to construction, each DFS facility must
include as part of the RCRA Trial Burn: 1) stack sampling for PCBs; 2)
sampling of kiln/HDC (heated discharge conveyor) residue; 3) cyclone
residue, and 4) scrubber brine for PCB analysis.  The results of the
RCRA Trial Burns must demonstrate that the DFS units meet the PCB
incinerator performance standards.

	EPA explored possible causes for the inconsistent DRE results at TOCDF,
and discovered that gaskets used in the flue gas duct work contained
trace quantities of PCBs.  EPA determined that the contaminant PCBs
contributed to the inconsistent DRE results.  The findings of the EPA
study prompted TOCDF to investigate the contamination problem further.
The Army submitted its findings in a report entitled:  “Evaluation of
Contamination Sources During Sampling for Polychlorinated Biphenyls
(PCBs) Summary Report,” Program Manager for Chemical Demilitarization,
EG&G Defense Material under the direction of Tooele Chemical Agent
Disposal Facility, dated August 23, 1999.   Conclusions of both studies
are similar and are summarized in Appendix IV.

	To preclude the emission of the contaminant PCBs,  PMCD shall begin a
campaign to detect PCB contaminants in ancillary process equipment
including, but not limited to, expansion joints, gaskets, and rubber
sealants (caulking compounds, etc.) used in the cyclone separator and
equipment downstream of the secondary combustor, including the combustor
exit connectors.  Items containing PCBs shall be eliminated from the
process equipment at TOCDF during routine maintenance, but prior to
construction or operation at the other chemical agent disposal
facilities.

	Operating conditions for the TOCDF DFS have been developed (Condition
2.a(1) and 2.a(2)).  These conditions shall apply to the other DFS
facilities until and unless NPCD determines that Trial Burn data or
other data submitted to NPCD and the appropriate EPA Regional Office
indicate that operating conditions should be altered.

	As a condition of this nationwide PCB Disposal Approval, each DFS
facility listed above (TOCDF excepted) must submit the following
documents to the NPCD: the RCRA permit application (i.e. Part A, 40 CFR
270.13 and Part B, 40 CFR 270.14(b) Para. (1), (2), (3), (8), (9)) and
trial burn plans submitted to the permitting agencies; trial burn test
reports; and documents related to the permitting of the facilities, such
as any requests for amending the trial burn plan.

	This TSCA PCB Disposal Approval may be modified, withdrawn, or further
conditions added at any time EPA has reason to believe that the
operation of the DFS presents an unreasonable risk of injury to health
or the environment.  Withdrawal of the approval or imposition of further
conditions may also result from future EPA rulemaking with respect to
PCBs.  Moreover, violation of any condition of this approval may subject
PMCD/EG&G or the operator (i.e., system contractor) at the facilities
other than TOCDF, to an enforcement action and/or termination of this
approval.

	Finally, this approval is based upon a conclusion drawn by EPA,
supported by the test burn data, that the TOCDF DFS, when operated in
accordance with the conditions of approval, does not present an
unreasonable risk of injury to health or the environment.  Please
contact Hiroshi Dodohara of my staff at<PHONE_NUMBER> if you have any
questions regarding this approval.

						Sincerely,

						[ signed ]

						David J. Kling, Acting Deputy Director

						Office of Pollution Prevention and Toxics

Enclosure

cc:	Jim Sales

	EPA Region VI

	Cathy Massimino

	EPA Region X

	EPA Regional PCB Coordinators

	Regions I - X

	Marty Gray

	Utah State, DHEQ

	Dr. Diane Nielson

	Utah State, Executive Director, DEQ w/o Enclosure

	Dr. Mario Fiorio, w/o Enclosure

	Assistant Secretary of the Army

	(Installation and Environment)

											Enclosure

	UNITED STATES ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY

IN THE MATTER OF THE DEPARTMENT OF THE	     )	APPROVAL TO DISPOSE

								     )

ARMY, PROGRAM MANAGER FOR CHEMICAL 	     )	OF POLYCHLORINATED

								     )

DEMILITARIZATION, ABERDEEN PROVING GROUND,  )	BIPHENYLS (PCBs)

								     )

MARYLAND, AND TO THE SYSTEM CONTRACTORS     )

								     )

DFS, CHEMICAL DEMILITARIZATION  FACILITIES	     )

	AUTHORITY

	This approval is issued pursuant to Section 6(e)(1) of the Toxic
Substances Control Act of 1976 (TSCA), Public Law No. 94-469, and the
Federal PCB Regulations, 40 CFR 761.70.  Background and Findings related
to this approval are attached to this approval as Appendix I.

	The Department of the Army is the owner of a process known as the
Deactivation Furnace System (DFS), located in the Tooele Chemical Agent
Disposal Facility (TOCDF), Deseret Chemical Depot, Tooele, Utah, and the
DFSs to be operational at the Anniston Chemical Agent Disposal Facility
(ANCDF), Alabama; Pine Bluff Chemical Agent Disposal Facility (PBCDF),
Arkansas; and Umatilla Chemical Agent Disposal Facility (UMCDF), Oregon.
 The DFS thermally destroys PCBs in non-liquid form contained in
shipping and firing tubes for chemical agent rockets.  The Program
Manager for Chemical Demilitarization (PMCD), Aberdeen Proving Ground,
Maryland represents the Department of the Army.  EG&G Defense Material,
Inc.,(EG&G), Tooele, Utah is the sole operator of the TOCDF DFS;
Raytheon Demilitarization Company is the operator at the UMCDF and
PBCDF; and Westinghouse

Government Environmental Services Company LLC, the sole operator at
ANCDF.  The Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) has carefully
scrutinized PMCD's and EG&G's operations.  In addition, EPA has audited
and observed demonstrations of the DFS process capabilities.  Pursuant
to 40 CFR 761.70, EPA finds that the TOCDF DFS process (when operated in
accordance with the conditions of this approval) does not pose an
unreasonable risk of injury to health or the environment.

 	EFFECTIVE DATES

	This approval to operate shall become effective April 1, 2002, and
shall expire March 31, 2007.

	FOREWORD

	If any administrative or procedural requirement of this approval has
been satisfied by other parties, or has been previously satisfied by the
permittee (e.g., completion of a risk assessment, financial
responsibility for a specific site, public participation), the permittee
is relieved of that requirement to the extent that it is duplicative.

	CONTENTS

Definitions

Conditions

Approval

Appendix

	  I.	Background and Findings

	 II.	TSCA/RCRA Chemical Agent GB, Trial Burn II Results of the
Deactivation Furnace System at the Tooele Chemical Agent Disposal
System, Deseret Chemical Depot, Tooele, Utah, November 1998

	III.	Trial Burn Results of the Deactivation Furnace System at the
Tooele Chemical Agent Disposal System, Deseret Chemical Depot, Tooele,
Utah, 1997

	IV.	PCB Study at TOCDF, Deseret Chemical Depot, Tooele, Utah, Summary

	DEFINITIONS

"Analytical data" means (a) a document from a chemical analysis
laboratory on the appropriate letterhead, or (b) appropriate chemical
instrument printouts with appropriate controls, standards, and written
instrumental operating parameters and conditions.  Technical judgment or
experience is not considered analytical data.

"Business hours" means 8:00 a.m. to 5:00 p.m. local time on weekdays,
except United States Government holidays.

"Change in scale" means a doubling or more of the volume of Waste Feed
notified to be treated at a site.

"Day" means a calendar day, unless otherwise specified.

"Duplicate analysis" means two gas chromatographic analyses of the
analyte prepared from one sample of material.

"DFS Facility" means the Tooele Chemical Agent Disposal Facility
Deactivation Furnace System (TOCDF DFS) or the Deactivation Furnace
System at the Anniston Chemical Agent Disposal Facility, Alabama; Pine
Bluff Chemical Agent Disposal Facility, Arkansas; and Umatilla Chemical
Agent Disposal Facility, Oregon.

"Lifetime exposure risk" means the risk to an average adult individual
who is exposed to a stated average concentration of a toxic material
daily, over the course of a 70-year lifetime.

"Lost time injury" or "Lost workday injury" means an injury occurring
during the operation of a DFS facility which results in an employee not
performing his/her normal assignments during the workday and/or any
successive workday(s) following the day of the injury.

"Minimal" with regard to an amount of PCB wastes means less than ten
percent of total wastes treated.

"Non-soil" solids and materials include non-pumpable sludge and
sediment.

"Operations" means the process of treating PCBs, including set up and
take down of the PMCD/System Contractors unit, as well as actual
treatment.

"OPPT" means the Office of Pollution Prevention and Toxics, United
States Environmental Protection Agency (7404);<PHONE_NUMBER>; Facsimile
(202) 566-0473.

"PCB" means polychlorinated biphenyls as defined in 40 CFR 761.3.

"PCB release" and "PCB spill" have the same meaning as "spill" as
defined in EPA's PCB Spill Cleanup Policy in 40 CFR 761.123.

"Process Failure" means the inability of the DFS unit to treat the
feedstock for reasons other than contaminants (such as chlorinated
solvents).

"Site" means the geographically contiguous property unit (such as a
single manufacturing plant) at which the DFS disposal operations are
conducted.

"Site location" means a street address or a directional description
which would allow a site to be found by an EPA inspector.

"System contractor" means the on-site field operator of the Tooele
Chemical Agent Disposal Facility Deactivation Furnace System (EG&G) and
the prime contractors who will operate the Deactivation Furnace System
at the Anniston Chemical Agent Disposal, Alabama) (Westinghouse
Government Environmental Services Company LLC); Pine Bluff Chemical
Agent Disposal Facility, Arkansas (Raytheon Demilitarization Company);
and Umatilla Chemical Agent Disposal Facility (Raytheon Demilitarization
Company), Oregon.

"2 ppm PCBs" treatment criterion is defined as follows: (a) When Aroclor
patterns are detected in the chromatogram of treated material, the
Aroclor will be quantified using Method 8082 or another method approved
by EPA, then the criterion for PCBs in the treated sample is "less than
2 ppm total PCBs (as calculated by comparison of total areas or height
to an external Aroclor standard having a similar pattern to the
sample);" or (b) When Aroclor patterns do not exist, the sample will be
quantified using the method using the Dry Color Manufacturing
Association (DCMA) standard, or another method approved by EPA, then the
criterion is "less than 2 ppm per PCB congener (or per resolvable gas
chromatographic peak, as calculated by comparison to an external
standard homolog peak having the nearest retention time to each
appropriate PCB peak to be quantified)."

“3 ppb PCBs” treatment criterion is defined as follows: (a) When
Aroclor patterns are detected in the chromatogram of treated material,
the Aroclor will be quantified using Method 8082 or another method
approved by EPA, then the criterion for PCBs in the treated sample is
"less than 3 ppb total PCBs (as calculated by comparison of total areas
or height to an external Aroclor standard having a similar pattern to
the sample);" or (b) When Aroclor patterns do not exist, the sample will
be quantified using the method using the Dry Color Manufacturing
Association (DCMA) standard, or another method approved by EPA, then the
criterion is "less than 3 ppb per PCB congener (or per resolvable gas
chromatographic peak, as calculated by comparison to an external
standard homolog peak having the nearest retention time to each
appropriate PCB peak to be quantified)."

"Year" means 365 days, except that in leap years “year” means 366
days.

	CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL

1.  Prior Written Notice, Authorized Operations and Public Participation

	a.  Prior Written Notice

	The PMCD must send a non-confidential written notice to the addressees
listed in paragraph b. at least 30 days before:

	 Conducting a permitted disposal activity at a DFS Facility, or

	Resuming a permitted PCB Disposal activity after a shutdown of PCB
waste feed for 30 or more consecutive days.

		(2)	The notice must include:

				The DFS facility name and telephone number;

				The names, titles, addresses, and telephone numbers of the
addressees required to be notified in paragraph b;

				Estimates of the amount and type of PCB (Aroclor, etc.) to be
treated and estimates of the concentration of PCBs in the material.  The
estimates shall be based on analytical data from a representative sample
of the material to be disposed of and/or historic analytical data from
similar material;

				The time(s) and date(s) the PCB disposal activity is scheduled to
take place.

			The information is provided for public information purposes and for
facilitating scheduling of government compliance monitoring and
oversight of PCB disposal operations.

		Addressees: The PMCD must send the notice described in paragraph a.
to:  EPA Headquarter’s Office of Pollution Prevention and Toxics (Mail
Code: 7404), the EPA Regional Office for the Region in which the DFS
Facility is located, the state agency, and the local jurisdiction.

  ADVANCE \u 3

	EPA CONTACTS

Name, Region	Telefax Number      Contact Number

Hiroshi Dodohara, EPA Hq<PHONE_NUMBER><PHONE_NUMBER>

Craig Brown, Region IV<PHONE_NUMBER><PHONE_NUMBER>

Lou Roberts, Region VI<PHONE_NUMBER><PHONE_NUMBER>

Dan Bench, Region VIII<PHONE_NUMBER><PHONE_NUMBER>

Dan Duncan, Region X<PHONE_NUMBER><PHONE_NUMBER>

	c.	Authorized Operations: PMCD shall not begin M55 rocket disposal
operations with firing tubes containing 50 ppm PCBs or greater at ANCDF,
PBCDF and UMCDF (CDFs) without a letter from EPA NPCD authorizing each
CDF to dispose of PCBs during the shakedown operations.  During the
shakedown operations, each CDF shall sample the stack emissions as
required by Condition 2.b.(3).A, to calculate the PCB destruction and
removal efficiency (DRE).  Results of this DRE analysis must be received
by EPA for review at minimum five days prior to the RCRA Trial Burn.
EPA will review this DRE results to determine whether the results
complied with the six 9s (99.9999%) DRE PCB incinerator requirement.
Upon determination of compliance, EPA will authorize, by letter, the
continuation of operations after the Trial Burn, termed Post-Trial Burn
Operations under RCRA, and designated Interim Operations under TSCA.  To
clarify, no CDF may continue operations after the Trial Burn unless
issued a written authorization by EPA NPCD.

	Public Participation: Each affected community must have an opportunity
to comment on the PCB issues related to the chemical weapons disposal
program.

.

		(1) Tooele Chemical Agent Disposal Facility, Deseret Chemical Depot,
Utah

EPA solicited public comments from the community and held several public
meetings.  EPA has prepared a document responding to the comments
received, and this document will be made available to the public.

		(2)  Anniston Chemical Agent Disposal Facility, Anniston, Alabama

EPA has held an initial public meeting in Anniston, and another public
meeting will be held after the results of the trial burn are available.

		(3)	Pine Bluff Chemical Agent Disposal Facility, Pine Bluff, Arkansas,
and Umatilla Chemical Agent Disposal Facility, Hermiston, Oregon

EPA will hold an initial public meeting in each community, for the
presentation of written or oral comments on this approval document and
the data available from the Tooele and Anniston facilities.  EPA will
hold an additional public meeting in each community after the trial burn
data from each respective facility become available.

2.  Operating Conditions:  PMCD and System Contractor may use the PMCD
DFS to destroy PCB-contaminated shipping and firing tubes containing
chemical and nerve agent rockets, limited to the M441 shipping/firing
tubes, under the following operating conditions.  These conditions are
based on the Army's results from the TOCDF Trial Burn II completed in
November 1998.  That trial burn indicated that the TSCA incinerator
requirements for 99.9999% destruction and removal efficiency (six 9s
DRE) of PCBs were achieved.  PCB emission rates were at minimum an order
of magnitude lower than the health risk assessment (HRA).  Dioxins and
furans were not detected in the stack samples.

	a.  Tooele Chemical Agent Disposal Facility, Deseret Chemical Depot,
Utah

	Operation of the TOCDF DFS is subject to the conditions expressed
herein, and must be consistent with the materials and data included in
the Army application "Preliminary Operating Permit Application, for the
Department of the Army Tooele Army Depot, Chemical Agent Disposal
Facility, Submitted to Division Director, National Programs Chemicals
Division, Office of Pollution Prevention and Toxics, Washington, D.C."
dated July 1993; "R&D Test Plan, PCB Destruction Unit Deactivation
Furnace System (DFS), Final, Facility Operator," dated November 27,
1995;  "Tooele Chemical Agent Disposal Facility (TOCDF), DFS TSCA
Demonstration Test Burn Report for the Deactivation Furnace System, EG&G
Defense Material, Inc., April 24, 1997;" and “Tooele Chemical Agent
Disposal Facility (TOCDF), RCRA Agent GB Trial Burn #2 Report for the
Deactivation Furnace System, Rev. 0, EG&G Defense Material, Inc.,
February 16, 1999.”

Target Values: For this approval, Target Values are the desired
operating condition for the parameters specified.  These Target Values
are based on the average values demonstrated during the DFS RCRA/TSCA
Trial Burn of 1997 and Trial Burn II of 1998.  The process value may
deviate from the Target Value within the Process Limits whenever minor
operational upsets occur; however, the process value should generally
exhibit the Target Value and the instrument setting for the specified
parameter should generally be kept at the Set Point.

Set Points: For this approval, EPA has defined set points as the value
of incinerator process control setting that achieves the Target Values.

Process Limits: Process Limits are placed such that whenever the process
value deviates from the Target Values during major operational upsets,
an Automatic Waste Feed Cut Off (AWFCO) is activated.  However, the
Process Limits should be placed such that a minor operational upset will
not activate the AWFCO.

			Regulatory Interlocks:  Feed to the DFS shall immediately be shut off
automatically for:  ADVANCE \d 5

	Failure of the monitoring operations specified in Condition 5d through
5f.  ADVANCE \d 5

	Failure of the recording equipment monitoring the PCB feed rate and
quantity measuring and recording equipment failing as specified in
Condition 5.a, must be immediately replaced by manual recording of the
PCB feed rate.

			Operating Conditions and Operational Interlocks:  The TOCDF DFS
incinerator shall operate at the following conditions (including Table
A) whenever PCBs are being incinerated:  ADVANCE \d 5

	Rocket Feed Rate:  ADVANCE \d 5

					At rocket feed rates of 16 rockets per hour or greater (rolling
hourly total), the Retort (kiln) Post-Quench Exhaust Gas Temperature
(16-TIC-008)* Target Value is 1450F.  An automatic waste feed cutoff
(AWFCO) with a 5-minute delay at < 1000F and > 1570F, and
instantaneous AWFCOs at < 850F and > 1650F shall be in place.
ADVANCE \d 5

					* Items in parenthesis are instrument TAG numbers (16-xxx-xxx).
These are identified because many instrument readings have multiple
sources.  See TOCDF Operation Manual or access website
http://www.deq.state.ut.us/

					eqshw/cds/T_Permit/ATCH19.pdf.”  ADVANCE \d 5

	 				At rocket feed rates of less than 16 rockets per hour (rolling
hourly total), the Retort shall operate within instantaneous AWFCOs at <
850°F and > 1650°F.

 				  ADVANCE \d 5 iii	Rocket feed rate Target is 33 rockets per hour
with a 5-minute delay AWFCO at a  feed rate greater than 3 rocket/5
minute and an instantaneous AWFCO at 33 rocket per hour rolling average.
 ADVANCE \d 5

	Retort Oscillation on AWFCO.  Whenever an automatic feed shutdown
occurs requiring retort oscillation, with rocket parts remaining between
the sliding gate and the tip gate, the tip gate will be opened to
release the rocket parts with the retort rotating for a minimum of 30
seconds prior to activating the oscillation phase.  ADVANCE \d 5

	The Heated Discharge Conveyor (HDC) Bottom Temperature (16-TIT-042)*
Target Value is 1080F.  An AWFCO with a 5-minute delay at < 1020F
and > 1110F, and an instantaneous AWFCO at < 1000F and > 1150F
shall be in place to minimize metals vaporization.  ADVANCE \d 5

				The Heated Discharge Conveyor (HDC) Top Temperature (16-TIT-184)*
Target Value shall be 1096F.  An AWFCO with a 5-minute delay at <
1060F and > 1130F, and an instantaneous AWFCO at < 1000F and >
1150F shall be in place to minimize metals vaporization.  ADVANCE \d
5

	 The Heated Discharge Conveyor Residence Time is  nominally 19 minutes.
 A 5-minute delay  AWFCO  for HDC  malfunctions  shall be in place when
the residence time decreases to 15 minute or below.  ADVANCE \d 5

	The Retort Rotational Speed (16-ZX-602)* Target Value shall be 1.9 rpm.
 An instantaneous AWFCO shall be at 2 rpm and at 0.33 rpm.  Whenever the

	following instantaneous AWFCOs are triggered, the retort shall activate
the oscillation mode:  ADVANCE \d 5

				i.	Heated Discharge Conveyor Temperature, Bottom (16-TALL-042)*

			      ii. 	Heated Discharge Conveyor Temperature, Top (16-TALL-184)*

			     iii.	HDC  Malfunction (16-SSL-057)*

			     iv. 	HDC Tip Gate Jam (16-XS-058)*

			      v.	HDC Slide Gate Jam (16-XS-821)*

			     vi. 	Kiln Speed Greater than 2 rpm (16-SAHH-602)*

			    vii.	Kiln Pre-Quench Temp. Less than 950°F (16-TALL-182)*

			   viii.	Kiln  Post-Quench Exhaust Gas Temp. Less than 850°F
(16-TALL-008)*  ADVANCE \d 5

				The retort shall continue to rotate whenever any other AWFCO
activates.  ADVANCE \d 5

			G.   Afterburner Exhaust Temperature (16-TIC-092)*:  ADVANCE \d 5

				i.	When feeding rockets at 16 rockets per hour or greater, the
Afterburner Exhaust Gas Temperature Target Value shall be 2150F, with
a 5-minute delay AWFCO at < 2125F and instantaneous AWFCOs at <
2050F and > 2350F.  ADVANCE \d 5

					When feeding rockets at less than 16 rockets pre hour, the
Afterburner Exhaust Gas Temperature Target Value shall be 2150°F with a
5-minute delay AWFCO at < 2135°F and instantaneous AWFCOs at < 2050°F
and > 2350°F.  ADVANCE \d 5

				iii	Rocket feed rate Target is 33 rockets per hour with a 5-minute
delay AWFCO at a  feed rate greater than 3 rocket/5 minute and an
instantaneous AWFCO at 33 rocket per hour rolling average.  ADVANCE \d 5

				The Afterburner Exhaust Gas CO (16-AIT-059, 24-AIT-207)* Target
Value is 8 ppm, adjusted to 7% O2.  There shall be a 5-minute delay
AWFCO at > 100 ppm, adjusted to 7% O2, and an instantaneous AWFCO at 200
ppm, adjusted to 7% O2.  ADVANCE \d 5

				 The Residence Time in the Afterburner (AB) Exhaust shall be no less
than 2 seconds as monitored by Afterburner Exhaust Velocity Head
(24-PDIT-813)* with a Target Value of 0.6" water column (w.c.).  There
shall be an AWFCO with a 5-minute delay at > 0.88" w.c. and an
instantaneous AWFCO at >0.93" w.c.  ADVANCE \d 5

				The Afterburner Exhaust Gas Excess Oxygen (O2) (16-AIT_175,
24-AIT-206)* with  Target Value is 10%.  There shall be a 5-minute delay
AWFCO at < 7.5%, and an instantaneous AWFCO at <3.0% and >15%..  ADVANCE
\d 5

			K.	The Retort Pressure (16-PIT-018)* Target Value is -0.50" w.c.
There shall be an AWFCO at  -0.10" wc with a 10-second delay and an
instantaneous AWFCO at 0."  The Retort Pressure is an indicator of draft
pressure throughout the combustion/air pollution abatement system.  The
PMCD/System Contractor must maintain a negative draft throughout the
system sufficient to preclude fugitive emissions from the combustion
chambers.  ADVANCE \d 5

				The Venturi Scrubber Brine Pressure Drop (24-PDIT-008)* Target Value
is 30" w.c.  There shall be a 5-minute delay AWFCO at < 23" w.c., with
an instantaneous AWFCO at < 20" w.c.

				The Venturi Brine Flow (24-FIT-006)* Target Value is 325 gpm with an
instantaneous AWFCO set at < 300 gpm.

				The Target Value for the Scrubber Tower Liquid Feed Rate
(24-FIT-030)* is 1000 gpm with a < 750 gpm instantaneous cutoff.

				The Target Value for the Scrubber Effluent Brine pH (24-AIC-007)* is
9.  There shall be a 5-minute delay AWFCO at < 7.

				The Target Value for the Scrubber Brine Density (24-DIT-033)* is
1.10 specific gravity unit (sgu).  There shall be an instantaneous AWFCO
at > 1.20.

				The Combustion Efficiency (16-AIT-781, 16-AIT-781B)* AWFCO  for the
afterburner is > 99.90% with a 5-minute delay.

				Instantaneous AWFCO on failure of Rotary Blowers to primary
combustion air.

				The Induce Draft (I.D.) Fan Current usage shall be nominal 315 amps
with a 5-minute delay with an instantaneous cutoff at 540 amps.

				Instantaneous AWFCO on I.D. Fan malfunction for both ID fans.

				During Compliance Testing and Trial Burns,

					stack sampling analysis must indicate that the Destruction and
Removal Efficiency (DRE) for PCBs in the PMCD/System Contractor system
shall be a minimum of 99.9999%.  DRE shall be calculated as follows:

					DRE = 100  X    ADVANCE \u 6 PCB Feed Rate In, lb/hr - PCB Stack
Emissions, lb/hr

										 PCB Feed Rate In, lb/hr  ADVANCE \d 6

					where PCB Feed Rate In =  Feed Rate X PCB concentration;

					and PCB Stack Emissions = Stack Gas Volume Rate X PCB

 					concentration

	The particulate emission rate shall be less than 0.08 grains/dscf
corrected to 7% oxygen using the procedure given in 40 CFR 264.343 (c).
The HCl emissions shall be less than the greater quantity of 4 pounds
per hour or one percent of the HCl entering the pollution control
system.

	TABLE A.   TOCDF DFS OPERATING CONDITIONS AND INTERLOCKS

F   (at rocket feed rate > 16 per hour) / Cond. (2) A (i)	1450	< 1000
< 850

> 1570	>1650

Retort Post-Quench Exhaust Gas Temp.°F  (at rocket feed rate < 16 per
hour) / Cond. (2) A (ii)	> 850 and < 1650

< 850

	> 1650

Heated Discharge Conveyor Temp, Bottom, F /

Cond. (2) C

1080	< 1020	< 1000

> 1110	>1150

Heated Discharge Conveyor Temp, Top, F  /

Cond. (2) D

1096	< 1060	< 1000

> 1130	>1150

Heated Discharge Conveyor Residence Time / Cond. (2) E	19 min.	< 15 min.

	Retort Rotational Speed, rpm   / Cond. (2) F

1.9

 < 0.33

	> 2.0

Afterburner Exhaust Gas Temp., F  (at rocket feed rate > 16 per hour)
/ Cond. (2) G (i)	2150	< 2125	< 2050

	> 2350

Afterburner Exhaust Gas Temp., °F  (at < 16 rockets per hour)  /
Cond. (2) G (ii)	2150	<2135	< 2050

	>2350

Afterburner Exhaust Gas CO, ppm, @ 7% O2 / Cond. (2) H	8  	> 100	>200

Afterburner Exhaust Velocity Head, " wc / Cond. (2) I	> 0.6	> 0.88	>
0.93

Afterburner Exhaust Gas O2, % / Cond. (2) J	10	< 7.5	< 3.0

	>15.0

Retort Pressure, " wc / Cond. (2) K	< - 0.50 	> - 0.10  (10 sec delay)	0

Venturi Scrubber Pressure Drop, " wc / Cond. (2) L	30	< 23	< 20

Venturi Scrubber Brine Flow, GPM / Cond. (2) M	325

< 300

Scrubber Tower Liquid Feed Rate, GPM / Cond. (2) N	1000

< 750

Scrubber Effluent Brine pH / Cond. (2) O	9

< 7

Scrubber Brine Density, sgu / Cond. (2) P	1.10

1.20

Combustion Efficiency, % / Cond. (2) Q	> 99.90	< 99.90

	Rotary Blowers / ond. (2) R	Functioning

Malfunction

I.D. Fan Current, AMPS / Cond. (2) S

315	540

I.D. Fan / Cond. (2) T	Functioning

Malfunction

	b.  Conditions Applicable to ANCDF, PBCDF and UMCDF:

		(1)	PCB Contaminated Process Ancillary Equipment.

				ANCDF, PBCDF and UMCDF shall begin a campaign to detect PCB
contaminants in ancillary process equipment including but not limited to
expansion joints, gaskets, and rubber sealants (caulking compounds,
etc.) used in the cyclone separator and other equipment downstream of
the secondary combustor, including the combustor exit connectors.  Items
containing PCBs shall be eliminated from the process equipment prior to
incineration operations or  construction.  Prior to start up operations,
each facility will submit a report of the results from the study to the
Fibers and Organics Branch (7404), Office of Pesticides and Toxic
Substances, 1200 Pennsylvania Avenue N.W., Washington, D. C. 20460.

(2)	Retort Oscillation: Whenever an automatic feed shutdown occurs
requiring retort oscillation, with rocket parts remaining between the
sliding gate and the tip gate, the tip gate will be opened to release
the rocket parts with the retort rotating for a minimum of 30 seconds
prior to activating the oscillation phase.

			Whenever the following AWFCOs are triggered, the retort shall
activate the oscillation mode:

				Heated Discharge Conveyor Temperature, Bottom

				Heated Discharge Conveyor Temperature, Top

			C.	HDC Residence Time

				HDC Tip Gate Jam

			E.	HDC Slide Gate Jam

			The retort shall continue to rotate at all other AWFCO activation.

	Interim Operations:  Disposal operations after the RCRA Trial Burn
shall discontinue, contingent upon successful completion of procedures
outlined in Paragraph 2.b(3)A below and shall not continue unless issued
a written authorization by EPA NPCD.  Interim Operations are operations
after the completion of the RCRA Trial Burn but before a Final Trial
Burn Report is reviewed and accepted, or before a TSCA PCB Disposal
Approval is issued, if determined  to be required by the EPA Regional
Office, State or other agency.  Operating conditions shall be governed
by this approval, or conditions imposed by the Regional Office, by the
State, or by other agencies, whichever are more stringent.

			A.  Approval Conditions

	PMCD shall complete a set (three tests minimum) of operationally
successful test runs (four-hour minimum) during the start-up or
shakedown operations in order to calculate the PCB destruction and
removal efficiency (DRE) of the Deactivation Furnace System (DFS).
There shall be no more than a total of two hours when the rocket feed is
shut off during each run.  The rocket feed rate shall be the same rate
that will be run during the RCRA Trial Burn.  Sampling shall comply with
all EPA stack sampling requirements for the methods used to determine
the PCB DRE.

				ii.	In the event that the shakedown tests fail to achieve the
required DRE, with EPA approval, PMCD may perform a single test of at
least four hour duration, referred to as a “mini-burn.”  The rocket
feed rate shall be the same rate that will be run during the RCRA Trial
Burn.  Sampling shall comply with all EPA stack sampling requirements
for the methods used to determine the PCB DRE.  The purpose of the
mini-burn is to verify the successful completion of the shakedown phase,
prior to the RCRA Trial Burn.

	iii.	From the tests during shakedown or the mini-burn, all PCB
analytical data needed to calculate the DRE shall be submitted to EPA in
writing a minimum of five work days prior to the start of the RCRA Trial
Burn.

				iv.	The analytical data from the shakedown tests or mini-burn shall
demonstrate a minimum DRE of 99.9999%.  Calculation of the DRE shall be
in accordance with the procedures described in Condition 2.a.(2).U of
this approval.

					  PMCD shall complete an operationally successful RCRA Trial Burn
subsequent to submission of acceptable results from paragraph (iii).
The operationally successful RCRA Trial Burn must include a minimum of
three, four-hour (minimum) runs of continuous feed of M55 rockets.
There shall be no more than a total of two hours when the rocket feed is
shut off.

				vi.	The following data shall be submitted to EPA.

	all PCB analytical data needed to calculate the DRE;

	all coplanar PCB concentration data, polychlorinated dibenzofuran
concentration data and all polychlorinated dibenzo-p-dioxin
concentration data needed to calculate total
2,3,7,8-tetrachlorodibenzo-p-dioxin equivalents (TEQ); and

	each test in the RCRA Trial Burn shall demonstrate a minimum PCB DRE of
99.9999% and a maximum TEQ of 0.2 nanograms per dry standard cubic meter
of emissions, adjusted to 7% excess oxygen.

                    	     vii.	No more than fifteen calendar weeks
following the completion of the

					RCRA Trial Burn, the complete RCRA Trial Burn Report shall be

					received by EPA.

			B.	The phased interim operations shall not begin until either the
shakedown test or the requirements in Conditions 2.b.(3).A.(i. through
iv.) above, and the RCRA Trial Burn completion requirement (Condition
2.b.(3).A.v.) have been met.  If Conditions 2.b.(3).A.(i through v.) are
met, interim operations may begin and continue for five calendar weeks.
If the requirements in Condition 2.b.(3).A.vi. are not met by the end of
five calender weeks, interim operations shall cease.  If the
requirements in Condition 2.b.(3).A.vi. are met, interim operations may
continue for an additional ten weeks, totaling fifteen weeks of interim
operations.  If the requirements in Condition 2.b.(3).A.vii. are not
met, interim operations shall cease.  If the requirements in Condition
2.b.(3).A.vii. are met, operations may continue until the M55 rocket
stockpile is completely destroyed or until EPA issues a cease order
based on review of the Trial Burn Report.

			As a condition of this nationwide PCB Disposal Approval, each DFS
facility must submit the following documents to the NPCD: the RCRA
permit application (i.e. Part A, 40 CFR 270.13 and Part B, 40 CFR
270.14(b) Para. (1), (2), (3), (8), (9)) and trial burn plans submitted
to the permitting agencies; trial burn test reports; and documents
related to the permitting of the facilities such as any requests for
amending the trial burn plan. Documents should be submitted 180 days
prior to start up of PCB shakedown operations of the DFS, to the Fibers
and Organics Branch, MC 7404, 1200 Pennsylvania Avenue N.W., Washington,
DC 20460.

	c.  Anniston Chemical Agent Disposal Facility, Anniston, Alabama

	Feedstock Restriction:

			A. Rocket Feed Rate: (Reserved)

			B. ANCDF shall not begin M55 rocket disposal operations with firing
tubes containing 50 ppm PCBs without a letter from EPA NPCD authorizing
ANCDF to dispose of PCBs during the shakedown operations.

	Operating Conditions and Restrictions: (Reserved)

d.  Pine Bluff Chemical Agent Disposal Facility, Pine Bluff, Arkansas

		(1)  Feedstock Restriction:

			A. Rocket Feed Rate: (Reserved)

			B. PBCDF shall not begin M55 rocket disposal operations with firing
tubes containing 50 ppm PCBs without a letter from EPA NPCD authorizing
PBCDF to dispose of PCBs during the shakedown operations.

		(2)  Operating Conditions and Restrictions: (Reserved)

	e.  Umatilla Chemical Agent Disposal Facility, Hermiston, Oregon

		(1)  Feedstock Restriction:

			A. Rocket Feed Rate: (Reserved)

			B. UMCDF shall not begin M55 rocket disposal operations with firing
tubes containing 50 ppm PCBs without a letter from EPA NPCD authorizing
UMCDF to dispose of PCBs during the shakedown operations.

		(2)  Operating Conditions and Restrictions: (Reserved)

3.  Waste Restrictions and Analytical Requirements:   The following
requirements (Condition 3) do not apply if the process residues are
disposed of in EPA-approved facilities, including chemical waste
landfills and Subtitle C landfills (for solid residues), or deep well
injection or wastewater treatment facilities which are approved for PCB
disposal of liquid residues.

	Representative samples of the treated material and residue from each
shift (12 hr.) operation must be collected and analyzed in duplicate
(i.e., duplicate analysis) by gas chromatography for PCB concentrations.
 Any processed ash or other non–aqueous waste, such as desiccated
brine, that was discovered to contain equal to or greater than 2 ppm PCB
must be managed as if it contained the original concentration of PCBs as
found in the firing/shipping tubes prior to processing.  It must be
stored in an appropriate manner and reprocessed through the incinerator
until process operations have indicated complete removal (less than 2
ppm) of PCBs. Alternatively it may be disposed of in an approved
chemical waste landfill.  Any DFS scrubber brine discovered to contain
equal to or greater than 3 ppb PCB must be incinerated in EPA-approved
PCB incinerators unless it can be shown that the discharge is controlled
under an existing National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System
(NPDES) permit which contains a standard limiting PCB discharge.

	Such waste materials include kiln and cyclone discharge,  desiccated
brine, and scrubber brines.  Whenever an agency(s) requires the sampling
and analysis of treated material or residue for polychlorinated
dibenzodioxins and polychlorinated dibenzofurans (including
2,3,7,8-tetrachlorodibenzodioxins (TCDDs) and
2,3,7,8-tetrachlorodibenzofurans (TCDFs)) the analysis must be
accomplished using laboratory techniques with detectable limits below
0.2 parts per billion (ppb).

	Analytical Methods: The chemical analysis of PCBs requires use of gas
chromatography.  Any gas chromatographic method that is appropriate for
the material being analyzed may be used, including EPA Method 608,
"Organochlorine Pesticides and PCBs" at 40 CFR part 136, Appendix A;"
EPA Method 8082, "Polychlorinated Biphenyls (PCBs) by Capillary Column
Gas Chromatography" of SW-846, "OSW Test Methods for Evaluating Solid
Waste," which is available from NTIS, and ASTM Standard D-4059,
"Standard Test Method for Analysis of Polychlorinated Biphenyls in
Insulating Liquids by Gas Chromatography," which is available from ASTM.

4.  Incinerator Failure:   If the quality control testing, as described
below and in Conditions 3, reveals that after the first five composite
samples (i.e. the first 60 hours of operation) that the DFS has not been
able to achieve the required less than 2 ppm PCB residue in both cyclone
ash and HDC ash streams at the same time, then PMCD/System Contractor
must stop operations of the DFS.  The PMCD must notify the EPA Regional
Office and the NPCD<PHONE_NUMBER> or by FAX at<PHONE_NUMBER> during
the business hours in Washington, D.C. on the day of the failure or, if
failure does not occur during business hours, during the next regular
business day, and file a written report within fifteen (15) days.  The
affected unit shall not resume operation until the problem has been
corrected to the satisfaction of the EPA, as expressed in writing.

5.  Monitoring and Recording:  Provisions must be made to assure that
the following process elements are suitably monitored and recorded for
all PCBs processed, such that materials harmful to health or the
environment are not inadvertently released:

	a.	quantity of PCB contained in M441 shipping/firing tubes and
concentration of PCBs (based on nominal 1247 ppm PCBs) and other raw
materials (i.e., feedstock and chemical reagents) fed into the
PMCD/System Contractor DFS system;

	b.	the rate and quantity of PCBs (M441 shipping/firing tubes feed rate
times the PCB concentration) fed shall be measured and recorded at least
every 15 minutes;

	c.	quantity and concentration of PCBs in the treated material,
including process wastes (the method of disposal and location of the
disposal facility for each waste should be documented) (see Condition 3
for applicable conditions);

	d.	temperature and pressure of combustion at least once during every
half-hour interval;

	e.	the kiln exhaust temperature and the afterburner temperature shall
be continuously measured and recorded;

	f.	the afterburner exhaust gas shall be monitored continuously for O2,
CO2, and CO when PCBs are being incinerated.;

	g.	date and time of operations; and

	h.	name, address, and EPA identification number of the facility.

	The records must be compiled and maintained in accordance with the
time(s) and location(s) specified in Condition 16.

6.  Annual Quality Control Monitoring:  Upon request from EPA,
PMCD/System Contractor shall conduct annual monitoring of the facility
for PCBs destruction and removal efficiencies and HCl removal
efficiency, and mass emission rates for particulates,
2,3,7,8-tetrachlorodibenzodioxin (TCDD), and
2,3,7,8-tetrachlorodibenzofuran (TCDF) and total polychlorinated
dibenzodioxins and total polychlorinated dibenzofurans.  This annual
monitoring must be consistent with procedures outlined in SW-846, and
may be part of an air permit compliance demonstration such as a State
Air Permit.  If the limits specified in the Conditions of Approval are
not complied with, U.S. EPA must be notified within one day of receipt
of the test results, and PMCD/System Contractor shall cease incineration
of PCBs.  If no disposal operations were conducted during the year of an
anniversary of this permit, EPA may request monitoring during the first
disposal operation in the following year after the anniversary.  All
parameters shall be monitored as required under this condition.

7.  PCB Releases:  In the event PMCD/System Contractor believes, or has
reason to believe, that a fugitive release of PCBs other than stack gas
emission has or might have occurred from the unit during processing, the
System Contractor must inform the appropriate EPA Regional Administrator
or PCB Coordinators by phone immediately after remedial actions have
been taken to ensure the protection of health and the environment.

	A written report describing the incident must be submitted by the
fifteenth (15th) business day after the day of the incident.  No PCBs
may be processed in that facility until the release problem has been
corrected to the satisfaction of the EPA, as expressed in writing.

8.  Spills:  Any spills of PCBs or other fluids shall be promptly
controlled and cleaned up as provided in the Spill Prevention, Control
and Countermeasures Plan provided in the application and trial burn
plan.  In addition, a written report describing the spill, operations
involved, cleanup actions and changes in operation to prevent such
spills in the future must be submitted to the appropriate EPA Regional
Administrator within fifteen (15) business days.  PCB spills must be
reported in accordance with the PCB spill reporting requirements
prescribed under Section 311 of the Clean Water Act for discharges to
navigable waters and under the Comprehensive Environmental Response,
Compensation, and Liability Act (Superfund) for discharges to other
media.

9.  Safety and Health:  PMCD/System Contractor must take all necessary
precautionary measures to ensure that operation of the DFS is in
compliance with the applicable safety and health standards, as required
by Federal, State and local laws and regulations and ordinances.  Any
lost-time injury occurring as a result of the operation of the DFS must
be reported to the PCB Disposal Site Coordinator in the appropriate EPA
Regional Administrator by the next business day.  A written report
describing the accident must also be submitted within five business
days.

10.  Facility Security:  The facility shall be secured (e.g., fence,
alarm system, etc.) to ensure that only those individuals participating
in the operations and approved visitors are allowed in the area.

11.  Incident Notification:  Any notification of an EPA Regional
Administrator required by conditions (6),(7), (8), and (9) shall also be
made by telephone to the NPCD<PHONE_NUMBER> within the time frame
specified.  In addition, PMCD/System Contractor shall file a written
report with the Director, National Program Chemicals Division, Office of
Pollution Prevention and Toxics, Office of Prevention, Pesticides and
Toxic Substances, 1200 Pennsylvania Avenue N.W., Washington, D. C. 20460
within the time frame specified.

12.  Waste Disposition:  Treated material such as the Heated Discharge
Conveyor discharge ash or cyclone ash or process waste such as
desiccated brine must be disposed of as PCB waste pursuant to 40 CFR 761
unless it is established through representative sampling that the
material contains levels of PCBs less than 2 ppm by individual congeners
or less than 2 ppm total PCBs if the analytical chromatogram indicates
Aroclor patterns. Spent scrubber brines must be disposed of as PCB waste
pursuant to 40 CFR 761 unless it is established through representative
sampling that the material contains levels of PCBs less than 3 ppb by
individual congeners or less than 3 ppb total PCBs if the analytical
chromatogram indicates Aroclor patterns.  PCB-contaminated equipment on
the PMCD/System Contractor unit may be transferred off-site only in
accordance with the U.S. Department of Transportation (DOT) requirements
at 49 CFR Part 172.  Such requirements include placarding the equipment
if the unit is not decontaminated after use.

13.  Agency Approvals/Permits:  No operation may commence until
PMCD/System Contractor has obtained all necessary approvals/permits from
Federal, State and local agencies.  PMCD/System Contractor is
responsible for obtaining such approvals/permits.

14.  Personnel Training:  PMCD/System Contractor shall be responsible
for ensuring that personnel directly involved with the handling or
disposal of PCB-contaminated M55 Rockets and shipping/firing tubes using
the DFS incinerator are demonstrably familiar with the general
requirements of this approval.  At a minimum, the general requirements
must include:

	a.	the disposal of M441 shipping/firing tubes which may be treated
using the DFS Facilities, and the expected upper limit of PCB
contamination which may be treated;

	b.	basic recordkeeping requirements under this approval and the
location of records;

	c.	notification requirements;

	d.	waste disposal requirements for process and by-product wastes
generated during the operation of the DFS incinerator;

	e.	safety, operation, and maintenance procedures;

	f.	procedures for using, inspecting, repairing, and replacing facility
emergency and monitoring equipment;

	g.	spill prevention and cleanup plan; and

	h.	reporting requirements.

	In this regard, PMCD/ System Contractor must maintain on-site during
the operations of its unit a copy of this approval; the Spill
Prevention, Control and Countermeasure plan; and sampling and analytical
procedures, as Condition 3 requires, used to determine PCB
concentrations of treated M441 shipping/firing tubes.  In addition, a
copy of the sampling and analytical procedures must be maintained in the
laboratory conducting the analysis.

15.  Financial Assurance:  Not Applicable.

16.  Recordkeeping:  PMCD/ System Contractor shall collect and maintain
for a period of five years from the date of the demonstration the
following information:

	a.	Continuous and short interval data described below:

		(1)	Rate and quantity of PCBs fed to the combustion system;

		(2)	Temperature of the combustion process;

		(3)	Afterburner exhaust gas analysis, including oxygen, carbon
monoxide and carbon dioxide.

	b.	Data and records on the monitoring of afterburner emissions and
combustion efficiency as required by these conditions.

	c.	The total weight in kilograms of any solid residues generated by the
incineration of PCBs during operations, and the total weight in
kilograms of any solid residues disposed by the facility as required by
this approval.

	d.	The name and address of each client whose PCBs were processed by the
DFS.

	e.	A copy of each gas chromatogram, including QC requirements such as
relevant standards and blanks, from the test required by Conditions 2, 3
and 12.

		The date(s) time and duration of the operations.

	g.	The name, address and telephone number of the operator and
supervisor.

	h.	An annual report shall be submitted to U.S. EPA Headquarters and to
the appropriate EPA Regional Office by 60 days after each anniversary of
the effective date of this permit.  The annual report shall include
information required in Conditions 16c, 16d, 16f. And 16g.  Data
required in Condition 5 and 16e shall be stored at a centralized
location at each facility and made available for EPA review.

	The documents must be compiled within 60 days following completion of
the treatment; must be kept at one centralized location; and must be
available for inspection by authorized representatives of the EPA upon
request.  PMCD/ System Contractor must also maintain the records
required by 40 CFR 761.180(f).  If PMCD/ System Contractor terminates
operation of the PMCD DFS, these records or their copies must be
submitted to the Director of the Office of Pollution Prevention and
Toxics, USEPA.

17.  Ownership or Operational Transfer:  PMCD/ System Contractor must
notify EPA at least 30 days before transferring ownership or operations
responsibility of the PMCD/ System Contractor PCB Decontamination
Unit(s).  PMCD/ System Contractor must also submit to EPA, at least 30
days before such transfer, a notarized affidavit signed by the
transferee which states that the transferee will abide by PMCD/ System
Contractor's EPA approval.  It is PMCD/ System Contractor's
responsibility to include in the notification: the name, the address,
phone number, and other pertinent information about the transferee.
PMCD/ System Contractor must also submit a report of permitted disposal
activities, including quantities and concentrations of PCB materials
treated; proof that generated wastes have been appropriately disposed;
certification that any PMCD/ System Contractor facilities, where
disposal equipment and/or supplies have been kept/maintained, will be
appropriately cleaned/removed before the transfer; and a description of
exactly what part (equipment and/or operating staff) of PMCD/ System
Contractor will be transferred.  In order for the PMCD/ System
Contractor EPA approval to be transferred and prior to conducting any
PCB disposal operations, the transferee must provide financial assurance
for closure and liability relevant to the type of activities in PMCD/
System Contractor's approval.

	Within thirty days of receiving such notification and affidavit, EPA
may issue an amended approval substituting the transferee's name for
PMCD/ System Contractor's name, or may require the transferee to apply
for a new PCB disposal approval.  In the latter case, the transferee
must submit a demonstration test plan for EPA review and upon approval
perform a demonstration at a site with materials of PCB concentration
proposed by the transferee and approved by EPA.  Should PMCD/ System
Contractor and the transferee fail to provide EPA with the required
written documentation related to the sale or ownership or operations
responsibility transfer and/or to provide this documentation within the
specified time frame, this permit shall be null and void.

18.  Additional DFS Incinerator Units:  PMCD/ System Contractor must
file a written pre-operation report with the Director for National
Program Chemicals Division of the Office of Pollution Prevention and
Toxics within thirty (30) days from the date of construction of each
additional DFS incinerator to be operated in the United States.  This
report should contain the following information:

	a.	date of construction of the unit;

	b.	identification of the new DFS unit;

	c.	certification by an independent, registered professional engineer to
the effect that the DFS incinerator is substantially identical to the
original demonstrated system in terms of engineering design, hardware,
process capacity, quality and workmanship;

	d.	certification by the chief executive officer of PMCD signifying that
the new DFS system has been completed in such manner; and

	e.	a list of all non-substantive changes made to the design and
construction of the new DFS system which are not identical to the
original TOCDF DFS incinerator.

EPA will hold an initial public meeting in each community affected by
the additional DFS units and a follow-up meeting after trial burn data
from additional units becomes available.

19.  Major Modifications:  No major modifications may be made to the
PMCD DFS incinerator design or operations, as described in the
application and demonstration plan for this approval, without prior
written approval of the EPA Regional Administrator.  The Regional
Administrator may require the submission of any information necessary to
evaluate the request for a major modification.  For the purpose of this
approval, "major modification" means any change to capacity, design,
efficiency, waste type, or any other changes affecting overall
performance or environmental impact.  A major modification includes any
modification that may affect the characteristics of the stack emission
products.  After such a modification, the operator must monitor stack
emissions and report stack emission concentrations for the following
parameters:

	a.	Oxygen, O2

	b.	Carbon monoxide, CO

	c.	Carbon dioxide, CO2

	d.	Nitrogen oxides, NOx

	e.	Hydrochloric acid, HCl

	f.	Total chlorinated organic content, RCl

	g.	PCBs

	h.	Total particulate matter

The operator must also report emission rates for parameters e, f, g, and
h.

	The EPA Regional Administrator will determine whether to allow for
public participation in the review of a modification, and if public
participation is allowed, will determine what form public participation
will take.  Public participation may include public notice, public
review of appropriate permit-related documents, a period for public
comment, a public meeting, and/or a hearing.

20.  Approval Severability:  The conditions of this approval are
severable, and if any provision of this approval or any application of
any provision is held invalid, the remainder of this approval shall not
be affected thereby.

21.  Approval Effective Date:  This approval shall expire five calendar
years from the date the permit becomes effective.  For an approval
renewal, EPA may require additional information and/or testing of the
PMCD DFS incinerator.  In order to continue the effectiveness of this
approval pending EPA action on reissuance, PMCD/ System Contractor must
submit a renewal request letter to EPA at least 90 calendar days, but
not more than 180 calendar days, prior to the expiration date of this
approval.

	APPROVAL

1.  Approval to dispose of PCBs is hereby granted to the Department of
the Army, Program Manager for Chemical Demilitarization, Aberdeen,
Maryland, to EG&G Defense Material, Inc. of Tooele, Utah and to the
System Contractors at other DFS Facilities, subject to the conditions
expressed herein, and consistent with the materials and data included in
the permit application filed by the company.  EPA reserves the right to
impose additional conditions when it has reason to believe that the
continued operation of the PMCD DFS unit presents an unreasonable risk
of injury to health or the environment.  Any such proposed additional
conditions shall be preceded by reasonable advance notice to PMCD/
System Contractor and opportunity for PMCD/ System Contractor to comment
on the proposed modifications.

	Any departure from the conditions of this approval or the terms
expressed in the application must receive prior written authorization of
the Director, National Program Chemicals Division, Office of Pollution
Prevention and Toxics.  In this context, "application" shall be defined
as all data and materials which have been received by this Agency from
PMCD/ System Contractors regarding the PMCD DFS incinerator.

2.  This approval to dispose of PCBs does not relieve PMCD/ System
Contractors of the responsibility to determine and comply with all
applicable Federal, State and local regulations.  Violations of any
applicable regulations will be subject to enforcement action, and may
result in termination of this approval.  This approval may be rescinded
at any time for failure to comply with the terms and conditions herein,
failure to disclose all relevant facts, or for any other reasons which
the Director, National Program Chemicals Division deems necessary to
protect health or the environment.

3.  PMCD/System Contractors shall be responsible for the actions of any
authorized DFS incinerator employees when those actions are within the
scope of operating or moving the DFS Process, and shall assume full
responsibility for compliance with all applicable Federal, State and
local regulations including, but not limited to, any advance or
emergency notification and accident reporting requirements.

4.  EPA reserves the right for its employees or agents to inspect the
TOCDF DFS and other DFS Facilities' PCB disposal activities at any
location or reasonable time.

							                     [ signed ]

  June 6, 2002

Date							David J. Kling, Acting Deputy Director

							Office of Pollution Prevention and Toxics

	APPENDIX I

	TOCDF DFS INCINERATOR

	BACKGROUND

	Section 6(e)(1)(A) of the Toxic Substances Control Act (TSCA) requires
that EPA promulgate rules for the disposal of polychlorinated biphenyls
(PCBs).  The rules implementing section 6(e)(1)(A) were published in the
Federal Register of May 31, 1979 (44 FR 31514) and recodified in the
Federal Register of May 6, 1982 (47 FR 19527).  Those rules require,
among other things, that various types of PCBs and PCB Articles be
disposed of in EPA-approved landfills (40 CFR 761.75), incinerators (40
CFR 761.70), high efficiency boilers (40 CFR 761.71), or by alternative
methods (40 CFR 761.60(e)) that demonstrate a level of performance
equivalent to EPA-approved incinerators or high efficiency boilers.  The
May 31, l979 Federal Register also designated Regional Administrators as
the approval authority for PCB disposal facilities.

	On March 30, 1983, EPA issued a procedural rule amendment to the PCB
rule (48 FR 13185).  This procedural rule change transferred the review
and approval authority of mobile and other PCB disposal facilities that
are used in more than one region to the Office of Prevention Pesticides
and Toxic Substances (OPPTS).  The purpose of the amendment is to
eliminate duplication of effort in the regional offices and to unify the
Agency's approach to PCB disposal.  The amendment gives the Assistant
Administrator authority to issue nationwide approvals (i.e., approvals
which will be effective in all ten EPA regions) to mobile and other  PCB
disposal facilities that are used in more than one region.  The
authority was subsequently delegated to the Director, National Programs
Chemical Division, Office of Pollution Prevention and Toxics.

	Under Congressional mandate, the Department of the Army must  dispose
of existing stocks of chemical warfare agent munitions.   The Army
intends to operate eight facilities throughout the country to dispose of
chemical agents.  PCBs have been identified within the M55 Agent Rocket
shipping and firing tube assembly.  Destruction of M55 Rocket components
is performed in the Deactivation Furnace System (DFS).  The DFS is one
component of a demilitarization facility, the Johnston Atoll Chemical
Agent Disposal System (JACADS), for chemical munitions, storage
containers, and the detoxification of nerve agents (GB and VX) and
mustard agent (H and HD) fills.  JACADS includes the DFS, the Dunnage
Incinerator, the Liquid Incinerator (LIC) and the Metals Parts Furnace.
The Army disposes of the M55 Rockets only in the DFS.

	M55 Rocket stockpiles are located in Tooele, Utah, Anniston, Alabama,
Pine Bluff, Arkansas, and Umatilla, Oregon.  The Army plans to operate a
DFS at each of these locations for the disposal of M55 Rockets.  These
DFS facilities are at different stages of construction: the DFS in Utah
is operational, the DFS in Alabama will be ready to begin start-up
activities shortly, while the facilities in Arkansas and Oregon will not
be ready until early in 2003.  However, as the DFS facility in each
location is intended to be identical in design and operation, EPA is
using the nationwide approval process for these facilities.
Concentrating the review and approval for these facilities in the
National Program Chemicals Division of the Office of Pollution
Prevention and Toxics will enable EPA to develop expertise in the
complex technical issues involved in the simultaneous destruction of
PCBs and chemical agent munitions.  The knowledge gained through the
start-up and trial burn process at each DFS facility can be accumulated
and applied to subsequent DFS facilities.  EPA believes that the
nationwide approval process, in coordination with the EPA offices in the
affected regions, is the best way to ensure that no DFS facility
presents an unreasonable risk of injury to health or the environment
from PCBs.

	In 1993, the Army completed the operations verification tests (OVT) of
the Army Johnston Atoll Chemical Agent Disposal Systems at JACADS.   The
completion of the OVT at Johnston Atoll was pivotal because, by
Congressional Order, no chemical agent disposal activity may be
conducted at any Army facility excepting Tooele, Utah, until the
completion of the OVT effort at Johnston Atoll.  Congress enacted Public
Law 100-456, September 29, 1988, National Defense Authorization Act, FY
1989, establishing the deadline of December 31, 1990 to complete the OVT
at Johnston Atoll.  The deadline for eliminating the chemical agent
stockpile was originally April 30, 1997, but has been extended to 2007.

	The Army submitted on July 1993, an application and demonstration plan
for a nationwide TSCA permit to dispose of PCBs in M55 Rockets at TOCDF.
 The application was updated June 6, 1996, December 12, 1996, and the
demonstration plan, on April 8, 1996.  Trial burn operations began
December 15, 1996 with the Fuel Only/Baseline Run.  The Army rescheduled
the trial burn to January 1997.  Four trial burn tests were completed
January 7, 9, 10, and 11, 1997.  The trial burn results were problematic
which resulted in the Utah State Department of Environmental Quality
invalidating the 1997 Trial Burn.  Subsequently, the Army  performed the
TOCDF Trial Burn II in November 1998.   The results of the trial burns
are summarized in Appendices II and III below.

	FINDINGS

1.  In 1979, the U.S. Department of the Army initiated operations to
destroy M55 rockets in the Deactivation Furnace System (DFS) located in
the Chemical Agent Munitions Disposal System (CAMDS) in Tooele Army
Depot, Tooele, Utah.  In the fall of 1985, PCBs were identified in the
F/S tubes which encase the M55 rockets.

	The M55 Rocket firing/shipping (F/S) tubes consists of either chopped
or matted fiberglass, depending on manufacturer, and weigh approximately
14 pounds each.  The two types of tubes are readily discernable
visually.  Analytical results from a sample of 55 tubes revealed that
the chopped variety consistently contained PCBs below 50 mg/kg (50 ppm).
 The matted type showed some results below 50 mg/kg PCBs; however, the
majority of matted tubes contained PCBs above 2000 mg/kg with a high
concentration of 4290 mg/kg.  One matted tube had been painted,
contained a level of 15,200 mg/kg PCBs and was considered a statistical
outlier and therefore not used by the Army in the calculation of PCB
content.

	Additional samples of the F/S tubes revealed that 3% of the 147 chopped
tubes sampled contained PCB concentrations of over 50 ppm.  The 1000
matted S/F tubes sampled exhibited a bimodal distribution with 47% of
the matted tubes containing less than 50 ppm PCBs and 53% of the tubes
containing PCBs concentrations of over 2700 ppm.  The highest
concentration of PCBs in the matted S/F tubes was found to be 5800 ppm.
The Army has sampled rockets from the TOCDF stockpile of M55 rockets to
characterize the feedstock.  The average concentration was 1,247 ppm
PCBs analyzed recently from a number of rockets.  This concentration was
used to calculate the destruction and removal efficiency of the TOCDF
incinerator.

2.  The Deactivation Furnace System contains the Explosive Containment
Room (ECR), the Retort, and the Pollution Abatement System (PAS).
Operators transport the rockets from storage, unpack and load them onto
a conveyor leading to the ECR.  Instruments control operations in the
ECR automatically.  A punch unit pierces the rocket warheads draining
and removing up to 95% of the chemical agent.  A shearing apparatus cuts
the rocket into eight segments.  The pieces are dropped into the Retort
through a sliding gate and then through a tipping valve.  The sliding
gate acts as a barrier to contain any deflagration or explosion.  The
rocket segments travel through the Retort countercurrent or opposite to
flow of hot gases and exit through a heated discharge conveyor.

3.  Combustion gases pass through a blast attenuation duct and flow into
the Cyclone separating large particulates from the gas stream.  The
gases continue through a slagging afterburner and a quencher, and are
then cleansed, using a venturi scrubber and a packed bed scrubber.
Finally, the gases pass through a mist eliminator and are discharged.

F.  Dimensions of the Retort are nominally 5-feet in diameter and 32
feet 10-1/2 inches long.

5.  A sealed drum below the cyclone collects particulates, primarily
fiberglass.  The cyclone collection has been changed to include a gate
discharge valve mechanism.  The collected material is periodically
analyzed for chemical agents.

6.  The afterburner, with a retention time of greater than two second,
operates at 2150F.  The quench tower reduces exhaust gases to less
than 300F while the venturi scrubber removes particulates.  A single
closed loop brine system serves both the quench tower and the venturi
scrubber.  A packed tower removes acidic gases while a controller unit
in the closed loop system maintains brine pH at a level of about 8.

7.  Details of the Deactivation Furnace System and the agent rockets
were filed with EPA Headquarters in Washington, D.C. in the application
and demonstration plan for TSCA PCB Disposal approval dated July 1993.

8.  Trial Burn 1997:  Four Trial Burn tests were completed during the
week of January 6, 1997.  Initially, the 1997 Trial Burn indicated that
results from the PCB stack samples did not achieve the six 9s DRE
consistently.  For the four test runs, the DREs were respectively:
99.999973%,  99.999668%, 99.999596%, and 99.999795%.  However, when
stack samples from the dioxin and furan (D/F) sample trains were
analyzed for PCBs, the results indicated that the DRE requirements were
achieved.  EPA acknowledged that the PCB results from the D/F sample
train met the six 9s DRE, but did not accept the results as part of the
Trial Burn data.  Further review of the data revealed that a single PCB
congener contributed the major part of the total PCB emissions.  The PCB
contaminant was subsequently identified as the
2,2',4,4'-tetrachlorobiphenyl congener; however, the source of the PCB
contaminant was not initially determined.

	EPA investigated the source of the PCB contaminating congener,
inspecting both the laboratory and the DFS facilities and practices.
EPA concluded that laboratory procedures were not the source of the PCB
contaminant.  During the DFS investigation, samples of process and
maintenance equipment were collected and analyzed.  Results showed that
gaskets used in the DFS contained trace levels of the PCB contaminant.
EPA believes that these PCBs may be extracted from items, such as the
gaskets, by process fluids such as scrubber brine or lubricating oils,
and the PCBs accumulate in the fluids.  Potentially, the extracted PCBs
may then be released to the flue gas thus being detected in the PCB
sampling trains.

	When adjusted for the contaminant PCBs, the DREs for the four test runs
were respectively: 99.999974%, 99.999985%, 99.999949%, and 99.999851%.
The second test was invalidated by the State of Utah because the stack
sampling protocol for semi-volatile organic compounds had been
compromised.  However, the PCB sampling train was intact and yielded
acceptable data.  Total PCB emission rates for the four runs were 19
nanograms/second (ng/sec), 262 ng/sec, 314 ng/sec, and 159 ng/sec,
respectively.  The maximum PCB emission rate resulting in no
unreasonable risk of injury to health or the environment under the
health risk assessment developed for the TOCDF is 1,510 ng/sec.

	To preclude the emission of the contaminant PCBs, PMCD began a campaign
to detect PCB contaminants in ancillary process equipment including but
not limited to expansion joints, gaskets, and rubber sealants (caulking
compounds, etc.) used in the cyclone separator and equipment downstream
of the secondary combustor, including the combustor exit connectors.
Items containing PCBs shall be eliminated from the process equipment at
TOCDF during routine maintenance, but prior to construction or operation
at the other chemical agent disposal facilities.

Based on trial burn experience at the Tooele TOCDF, Deseret Chemical
Depot, Utah and the Johnston Atoll Chemical Agent Disposal System
(JACADS), Johnston Atoll, Pacific Island, EPA concludes that as part of
the RCRA Trial Burns, sampling for PCBs is necessary at each DFS
facility yet to be constructed or operated.  Both facilities, JACADS and
TOCDF, experienced difficulties demonstrating that they achieved the PCB
incinerator performance standards.  Therefore, each DFS facility must
include as part of the RCRA Trial Burn, stack sampling for PCBs and
sampling of kiln/HDC (heated discharge conveyor) residue, cyclone
residue, and scrubber brine for PCB analysis.

	Of the four Trial Burn tests, Run 1 achieved the DRE incinerator
requirement.  Noted is the fact that Run 1 did not contain significant
levels of the PCB contaminant congener.  Furthermore, when the quantity
of the PCB contaminant was subtracted from the total PCB emission, Runs
1, 2 and 3 indicated that the six 9s DRE was achieved.  However, Run 4
exhibited a 99.9998% DRE.  EPA believes that the results from Run 4 can
be attributed to fluctuations in operating parameters such as feed rate
and afterburner temperatures.

	To minimize PCB emissions, EPA has developed conditions consistent with
data generated during the TSCA/RCRA Trial Burn.  To better understand
the operations of these incinerators, EPA requires TOCDF, during the
campaign to dispose of the remaining rockets, to perform three stack
test, using Trial Burn protocol.  Each test shall be a minimum of four
hours duration.  Tests must be performed with rocket shipping tubes from
the same lot or lots which have exhibited substantially identical PCB
levels.  Details of the test conditions are included in Condition
2.a(2)A.

9.  Trial Burn II 1998:  The Army's results from the TOCDF Trial Burn II
completed in November 1998 indicated that the TSCA incinerator
requirements for 99.9999% destruction and removal efficiency (six 9s
DRE) of PCBs were achieved.  PCB emission rates were at minimum an order
of magnitude lower than the health risk assessment (HRA).  Dioxins and
furans were not detected in the stack samples.

10.  In 1974 the American National Standard Institute, Inc. (ANSI)
published the “Guidelines for Handling and Disposal of Capacitor- and
Transformer-Grade Askarels Containing Polychlorinated Biphenyls.”  For
the disposal of liquid PCB waste, Section <IP_ADDRESS> of the guidelines
require a balance between dwell time and temperature plus oxygen
availability for proper incineration and suitable scrubbers to remove
the hydrogen chloride that is formed.  A dwell time of 2 seconds at
2000°F and 3% excess oxygen in stack gas, or a 1.5 dwell time at
2700°F and 2% excess oxygen in the stack gas are two combinations
presented.

11.  EPA published recommended procedures for the disposal of liquid
waste, based on the ANSI guidelines, in the April 1, 1976 issue of the
Federal Register.  At that time, disposal procedures for PCBs in solid
waste were not established.  Disposal conditions for liquid PCBs and
non-liquid PCBs were proposed on May 24, 1977.  For liquids, these
conditions were: 1200°C + 100°C (2192°F + 180°F), 2 seconds dwell
time, and 3% excess oxygen in the stack gas.  These conditions do not
apply to non-liquid PCBs, however, a mass emission requirement better
known as the six 9s DRE requirement was established for non-liquid PCBs.
 EPA promulgated the disposal regulations on May 31. 1979.

 Figure A1.  PCB Thermal Decomposition         Profile with Temperature
Variation.

     *J. Tessitore & F. Cross. “Pollution Engineering, Nov. ‘88, p88

12.  Scientific studies confirm the destruction of PCBs when the
ANSI-recommended conditions are followed. One study exhibited effective
destruction of PCBs at greater than 1000°C (1842°F) and a retention
time of 2.0 seconds (see Figure A1).  The same study indicated effective
destruction of PCBs with a retention time of 2 seconds and varying
concentration of oxygen (see Figure A2).  The destruction effectiveness
noticeably improved as the oxygen level increased from 0% (pure
nitrogen) to 21% (air) to mixtures of pure oxygen in pure nitrogen (2%
and 40%).

13.  Complying with requirements for the incineration of PCBs, EPA
Region 6, issued a PCB Disposal permit to Rollins Environmental
Services, Inc. of Deer Park, Texas after successful completing a PCB
incineration test in November 1979.  The tests verified ANSI’s
recommended operating conditions conform to results of the

 Figure A2.  PCB Thermal Decomposition         Profile, Oxygen Dependent

    * J. Tessitore & F. Cross, “Pollution Engineering”
Nov. ‘88, p85.

study previously mentioned.  Using a feed stock containing 35% PCB, the
test results indicated a destruction efficiency of > 99.99997% and a
combustion efficiency of 99.993%.  Operating conditions included a
temperature of 1146°C (2095°F) minimum, a dwell time of 2.68 seconds,
and an oxygen concentration of > 7%.

 Figure A3.  PCB Destruction Efficiency            with Varying Dwell
Time

         *J. Tessitore 7 F. Cross, “Pollution Engineering, Aug. ‘87,
p73

14.  A study to verify PCB destruction of PCB in contaminated solid
waste was performed using various media including soil and lagoon
sediment from a remediation site.  These material contained low level
PCBs ranging from 79 to 296 ppm PCBs.  Low level PCBs combined with high
moisture content in the feed material resulted in difficulty achieving
the six 9s DRE.  However, extrapolation of the data estimated the
conditions which would attain the DRE requirement.  Figure A3 presents
data plotting retention time versus DRE.  The two points at the bottom
of the chart were not included in the extrapolation.  These two data
point were results from solid waste spiked with PCBs to above 7500 ppm
levels.  Combustion temperatures ranged from 2041°F to 2215°F.  The
retention time estimated to achieve the six 9s DRE is 1.8 sec.

Figure A4 plots data which estimate six 9s DRE achievement when oxygen
content reaches 11% oxygen level.  Again the two points at the bottom
were not included in the extrapolation.  This study concludes that six
9s DRE may be achieved although the solid waste contains high levels of
moisture when retention time is above 1.8 seconds and with elevated
levels of oxygen.

15.  Destruction of PCBs in solid waste was demonstrated in May 1988
during tests performed by Roy F. Weston, Inc. (Weston) to obtain a
nationwide TSCA PCB Disposal Approval.  Weston achieved six 9s DRE

 incorporating the following range of operating conditions:

 Figure A4. PCB Destruction Efficiency             with Varying Oxygen
Concentration

        *J. Tessitore & F. Cross, “Pollution Engineering, Aug. ‘87,
p74

	temperature:	2,191°F  -  2,202°F

	retention time: 	2.08  -  2.11 seconds

	oxygen: 		13.2  -  13.8 %

	solid waste PCB level:

				 	10,819  -  19,323 ppm.

Weston achieved the required destruction levels with solid waste
containing higher levels of PCBs.  However, Ogden Environmental System
(OES) demonstrated their Circulating Bed Combustor for TSCA approval in
September of 1988 at the Kenai Peninsula, Alaska with solid waste
containing low levels of PCBs.  Operating conditions for the OES unit
were in the following range:

	temperature:	1,605°F  -  1,701°F

	retention time:	1.47  -  1.68 seconds

	oxygen: 		4.4  -  5.3 %

	solid waste PCB level:

				 	338  -  603 ppm.

EPA issued both the Weston unit and the OES unit nationwide approvals to
dispose of PCBs.  They were mobile or transportable units with
capability of being disassembled and transported from one location to
another to treat solid waste containing PCBs.

16.  Undrained Rockets: A portion of the GB M55 Rockets contained
solidified or gelled chemical agent.  Solidification of the agent
prevented full drainage of the rocket warhead.  During Post-Trial-Burn
operations under Utah’s RCRA permit and Interim Operations under TSCA,
the Utah Department of Environmental Quality approved the incineration
of about one undrained rocket per hour.  During full scale operations,
the Utah Agency approved the incineration of one undrained rocket every
37 minutes or about two rockets per hour.  These feed rates complied
with the feed rate limit for the incineration of GB chemical agent under
the RCRA Program.  GB agent was not detected in the stack gas during
incineration operations.  Under TSCA, the approved rate for Interim
Operations and full scale processing is 33 rockets per hour, or more
appropriately, the PCB contained in 33 rockets per hour.  EPA believes
that PCB emissions from processing of two rockets per hour will be
nearly proportionate from that of processing 33 rockets per hour or
about one-seventeenth the emissions from incineration of 33 rockets per
hour.

	The operating conditions, i.e.,  the waste feed operation which include
the sectioning of rockets and the feeding sequence, and the combustion
temperature and residence time, comply with operating conditions as
specified under this approval and reflect operating conditions during
Trial Burn 2.  Scientific studies and comprehensive testing of numerous
incinerator units have verified that destruction of PCB is effective
under conditions paralleling those conditions maintained during Trial
Burn 2 of the TOCDF Deactivation Furnace System.  Based on Trial Burn 2
test results, the target operating conditions imposed by this Approval
is:

	temperature: 			2150°F

	retention time: 		2 seconds

	oxygen: 			10 %

The permit conditions compare favorably with those required by the PCB
Disposal regulations, the scientific studies and those of other
permitted incinerators.  Therefore, EPA believes that incineration of
two undrained rockets per hour will not present an unreasonable risk to
human health and the environment.

17.  The TOCDF demonstrated and EPA finds that the DFS meets or exceeds
the operating performance criteria for incineration of non-liquid PCBs
under 40 CFR 761.70.  The currently accepted performance level for
EPA-approved incinerators is 99.9999% destruction and removal efficiency
(DRE) for PCBs.  The Agency has judged that these criteria are met and
that the operation of this thermal destruction technology will not
present an unreasonable risk to human health or the environment.

											APPENDIX II

	TSCA/RCRA CHEMICAL AGENT GB

	TRIAL BURN II RESULTS OF THE DEACTIVATION FURNACE SYSTEM

	AT THE TOOELE CHEMICAL AGENT DISPOSAL FACILITY

	AT DESERET CHEMICAL DEPOT, TOOELE, UTAH

	NOVEMBER 1998

PROGRAM SUMMARY

Objective:  The test burn served the dual purpose of a Toxic substance
Control Act (TSCA) Demonstration Burn and a Resource Conservation and
Recovery Act (RCRA) Trial Burn.  Performance criteria for TSCA and RCRA
are summarized below:

1.  PCB destruction and removal efficiency of 99.9999% or greater or no
detectable PCBs (1 ng PCB/stack sample) in the stack must be achieved.

2.  Stack particulate emissions must be less than 0.08 grains/dry
standard cubic foot or 180 mg/dscm.

3.  Combustion efficiency must be 99.9% or greater.

4.  HCl removal from the flue gas by the pollution abatement system
(PAS) must be 99% or greater, or the HCl emission rate must be less than
4 lb/hr.

5.  A GB destruction and removal efficiency of 99.99% or greater must be
demonstrated.

6.  Additional requirements included monitoring the DFS flue gas for:

	a.	oxygen, O2

	b.	carbon monoxide, CO

	c.	carbon dioxide, CO2

	d.	nitrogen oxides, NOx

	e.	Volatile Organic Compounds

	f.	Semi-volatile Organic Compounds

	g.	Polychlorinated Dibenzo-p-Dioxins and Dibenzofurans, PCDD/F

	h.	Trace Metals

	i.	Total hydrocarbons

	j.	HF

		TNT

		Nitroglycerin

7.  Further requirements during the Trial Burn included analysis of
solid residues and liquid effluent for the following:

	a.	PCBs

	b.	Nitroglycerin

	c.	Volatile and semivolatile organics

	d.	PCDD/F

	e.	TCLP Metals

TRIAL BURN SUMMARY

1.  Rocket Feed Rate:  The desired rate or set point for feeding the
rockets into the DFS is 38 rockets per hour.  For the three runs
completed, the rocket feed rate averaged 32.5 rockets per hour.

F.  At the exhaust side of Afterburner, the average operating
temperature was 2150F.

3.  Combustion Efficiency:  The DFS met the combustion efficiency of
99.9% pursuant to 40 CFR 761.70(a)(2) for all the runs.  The combustion
efficiency average for the three runs was 99.99%.

4.  PCB DREs:  The destruction and removal efficiency (DRE) for Run 1, 2
and 3 were above the 99.9999% DRE required for PCBs at §761.70(b)(1).

5.  Emissions:  Stack sampling results indicate particulate emissions to
be well below the existing standards of 180 mg/dscm (0.08 gr/dscf).  The
average for the three runs is 2.9 mg/dscm (0.0037 gr/dscf).  Sampling
for hydrogen chloride (HCl) indicate <0.0092 g/sec HCl in the stack gas.
 Other stack gas parameter averages were: (a) oxygen -  9.6%, (b) carbon
monoxide - 6.0 ppm, and (c) carbon dioxide - 6.9%.

	No PCDDs or PCDFs were detected in the stack samples and so the
emission rate complied with the health risk assessment (HRA) level for
all dioxin and furan homologues.  Stack samples for energetic compounds
indicated emission rate for nitroglycerin to be below the HRA level with
the TNT emission rate averaging <5.3E-06 compared to the HRA level of
2.53E-06 lb/hr.

	Products of incomplete combustion (PICs) include volatile and
semi-volatile organic compounds.  Fourteen volatile organic compounds
were detected, including chlorinated and bromated compounds.  Four of
these compounds exceeded the HRA emission rates.  Semi-volatile PICs
detected in the stack gas were dimethyl phthalates, benzaldehyde, and
acetophenone, however, the emission rates did not exceed the HRA
emission levels for these compounds.  For metals emissions, antimony,
cadmium, lead, and mercury emission rates were above the HRA levels.

6.  Afterburner Residence Time:  The afterburner residence time for Runs
1, 2, and 3 were 3.1, 3.1, and 3.0 seconds, respectively.

	SUMMARY OF TEST CONDITIONS AND RESULTS

Process					                 Test Runs                   		Require-

Parameters	Units	FOB*	No. 1	No. 2	No.3 	    Avg.    	  ments

F

   Retort Burner End (HDC Top)		1092	1098	1098	1099	1098.7	> 1000

   Afterburner Exhaust		2150	2150	2150	2150	2150	2200+150

Combustion Efficiency	%	99.99	99.99	99.99	99.99	99.99	>99.9

PCBs DRE	%	NA	99.999987	99.999986	99.999984	99.999985	>99.9999

Rocket Feed Rate Set Point	no./hr	NA	38	38	38	38

Rocket Feed Rate	no./hr	NA	30.8	33.6	33.0	32.5

Total Rockets Processed, Line A	rkts	                NA	108	99	126

Total Rockets Processed, Line B	rkts	NA	113	137	149

PCB Feed Rate	kg/hr	NA	0.22	0.24	0.22

g/dscm	0.0022	0.0020	0.0022	0.0025	0.0023

PCB Emission Rate	gm/sec	8.2E-09	8.0E-09	8.9E-09	1.0E-08	8.97E-09
5.39E-07	 (HRA)

GB Agent DRE	%	NA	99.9999975	99.9999972	99.9999977

GB Feed Rate, Purity Corrected	lb/hr	NA	11.1	9.9	11.9

GB Concentration	g/m3	NA	<2.81E-03	<2.77E-03	<2.73E-03

Particulate Conc., to 7% O2	mg/dscm	3.0	2.4	3.8	2.4	2.9	<180

Particulate Emission Rate	g/sec	0.0082	0.0074	0.0121	0.0082	0.0092
0.0174	 (HRA)

HCl Emission	lb/hr	<0.0153	<0.0158	<0.0148	<0.0156	<0.015	<4

HCl Emission	g/sec	<0.0019	<0.0020	<0.0019	<0.0020	<0.0020	<0.00115
(HRA)

Stack Gas Flow Rate	dscf/hr	462,780	474,240	495,660	532,620	500,840

Oxygen	%	10.5	9.6	9.6	9.6	9.6

Carbon dioxide	%	5.4	7.1	6.8	6.9	6.9

Carbon Monoxide, to 7% O2	ppm	5	6	6	6	6	<100

*Fuel-Only Burn No. 2

PCB ANALYSIS

PCB Homologues/Congeners Per Sample

PCB, ng/sample	   FOB Run	   Run 1   	   Run 2   	   Run 3

Total Chlorobiphenyl		<1	<1	<1

Total Dichlorobiphenyl	2.9	1.2	3.2	4.6

Total Trichlorobiphenyl	<1	2.7	2.1	2.2

Total Tetrachlorobiphenyl	<1	<1	<1	<1

2,2',4,4'-Teterachlorobiphenyl	<1	<1	<1	<1

3,3',4,4'-Tetrachlorobiphenyl	<1	<1	<1	<1

Total Pentachlorobiphenyl	<1	<1	<1	<1

3,3',4,4',5-Pentachlorobiphenyl	<1	<1	<1	<1

Total Hexachlorobiphenyl	<1	<1	<1	<1

3,3',4,4',5,5'-Hexachlorobiphenyl	<1	<1	<1	<1

Total Heptachlorobiphenyl	<1	<1	<1	<1

Total Octochlorobipenyl	<1	<1	<1	<1

Total Nonochlorobiphenyl	<1	<1	<1	<1

Total Decachlorobiphenyl	<1	<1	<1	<1

DIOXIN/FURAN ANALYSIS

PCDD/PCDF, pg/sample	   FOB Run	   Run 1   	   Run 2   	   Run 3

PCDDs

   2,3,7,8-TCDD	<5.2	<5.8	<3.9	<4.1

Total TCDD	 <8.2	<8.7	 <8.6	<9.3

   1,2,3,7,8-PeCDD	<6.0	<9.0	<5.5	<5.9

Total PeCDD	<14.0	<19  	<20  	<18

   1,2,3,4,7,8-HxCDD	<6.3	<8.0	<6.1	<6.6

   1,2,3,6,7,8-HxCDD	<5.5	<7.0	<6.1	<5.9

   1,2,3,7,8,9-HxCDD	<5.6	<7.2	<5.3	<5.9

Total HxCDD	<6.3	<8.0	<5.5	<6.6

   1,2,3,4,6,7,8-HpCDD	<4.8	<6.6	<4.5	<5.8

Total HpCDD	<4.8	<6.6	<4.5	<5.8

OCDD	<30  	<21  	<22  	<20

Total PCDDs	<63  	<63  	<62  	<59

PCDFs

   2,3,7,8-TCDF	 <6.1	 <6.5	 <5.9	<6.6

Total TCDF	 <6.1	 <6.5	 <5.9	<6.6

   1,2,3,7,8-PeCDF	<4.3	<5.1	<4.2	<4.7

   2,3,4,7,8-PeCDF	<4.4	<5.5	<4.2	<4.9

Total PeCDF	<4.4	<5.1	<4.2	<4.9

   1,2,3,4,7,8-HxCDF	<2.9	<4.1	<3.2	<3.2

   1,2,3,6,7,8-HxCDF	<2.9	<4.2	<3.3	<3.2

   2,3,4,6,7,8-HxCDF	<3.2	<4.6	<3.6	<3.6

   1,2,3,7,8,9-HxCDF	<3.8	<5.5	<4.3	<4.2

Total HxCDF	<3.8	<5.5	<4.3	<4.2

   1,2,3,4,6,7,8-HpCDF	<2.6	<2.5	<2.2	<2.6

   1,2,3,4,6,7,8-HpCDF	<2.6	<2.8	<3.3	<3.7

Total HpCDF	<3.1	<3.1	<3.3	<3.7

OCDF	<6.1	<7.7	<7.6	<5.9

Total PCDFs	<24 	<28  	<25  	<25

DIOXIN/FURAN EMISSION RATES, gm/sec

					HRA

					Emission

PCDDs	FOB Run	   Run 1   	   Run2   	   Run 3   	      Rate

Total TCDD	<5.5E-12	<5.8E-12	<5.7E-12	 <6.2E-12	  5.27E-11

Total PeCDD	<9.4E-12	<1.3E-11	<1.3E-11	<1.2E-11	2.63E-10

Total HxCDD	<4.2E-12	<5.3E-12	<4.0E-12	<4.4E-12	7.19E-10

Total HpCDD	<3.2E-12	<4.4E-12	<3.0E-12	<3.8E-12	5.63E-10

OCDD	<2.0E-11	<1.4E-11	<1.5E-12	<1.3E-11	1.20E-09

PCDFs

Total TCDF	 <4.1E-12	<4.3E-12	<3.90E-12	4.4E-12	5.27E-11

Total PeCDF	<2.9E-12	<3.4E-12	<2.8E-11	<3.2E-12	5.39E-10

Total HxCDF	<2.5E-12	<3.6E-12	<2.8E-12	<2.8E-12	1.10E-09

Total HpCDF	<2.1E-12	<2.1E-12	<2.2E-12	<2.4E-12	6.35E-10

OCDF	<4.1E-12	<5.1E-12	<5.0E-12	<3.9E-12	5.27E-10

Total PCDF/PCDDs	<5.8E-11	<6.0E-11	<5.7E-11	<5.6E-11	5.65E-09

ENERGETIC COMPOUNDS EMISSIONS SUMMARY

					HRA

					Emission

	FOB Run	   Run 1   	   Run2   	   Run 3   	      Rate

Concentrations, g/dscm

Nitroglycerin	<8.4	<6.3	<5.4	<5.6

2,4,6-Trinitrotoluene	<2.0	<1.6	<1.2	<1.3

Emission Rates, g/sec

Nitroglycerin	<3.0E-05	<2.5E-05	<2.1E-05	<2.03E-05	2.53E-04

2,4,6-Trinitrotoluene	<7.1E-06	<6.2E-06	<4.5E-06	<5.2E-06	2/52E-06

TOTAL ORGANIC COMPOUNDS (TOC) EMISSIONS

CONCENTRATIONS, g/dscm		FOB Run	   Run 1   	   Run2   	   Run 3

	Volatile TOC                	<5461	<5456	<5449	<5450

	   C1 through C8

	Semi-Volatile TOC      	262	302	369	420

	C8 through C17

	Non-Volatile TOC       	1612	1812	1779	1679

EMISSION RATE, g/sec

	Volatile TOC                	<2.0E-02	<2.2E-02	<2.2E-02	<2.2E-02

	    C1 through C8

	Semi-Volatile TOC      	9.3E-07	1.2E-06	1.4E-06	1.6E-06

	C8 through C17

	Non-Volatile TOC       	5.7E-03	7.1E-03	6.9E-03	6.6E-03

	PRODUCTS OF INCOMPLETE COMBUSTION

VOLATILE ORGANICS					                                     EMISSION
RATES, g/sec
                                          CONCENTRATIONS, g/dscm

					HRA   						                 Applicable Standards

					Emission					OSHA TWA	   ACGIH TLV&

	  FOB Run	  Run 1  	  Run 2  	   Run 3  	   Rates   	 FOB Run 	  Run 1
	  Run 2  	   Run 3  	PELS, mg/dscm	 Others, mg/dscm

Acetone	<4.1E-05	<5.4E-05	<5.6E-05	<5.8E-05	2.75E-01	<11.2	<13.5	<14.1
<14.0	2400	2400

Benzene	<9.0E-06	<8.2E-06	ND   <8.7E-06	<8.7E-06	1.08E-04	<2.5	<2.1	ND
        <2.2	<2.2	10 ppm	0.5 ppm

Bromodichloromethane	<1.2E-05	<1.3E-05	<1.3E-05	1.1E-05	1.08E-05	<3.4
<3.3	<3.3	<2.8

Bromoethene (Vinyl Bromide)	<3.7E-05	ND   <4.1E-05	ND   <4.0E-05	ND
<4.0E-05	ND                   	<10.2	ND         <10.3	ND         <10.1
ND           <9.9	ND

Bromoform	<2.0E-05	<1.5E-05	<1.5E-05	<1.1E-05	1.34E-04	<5.5	<3.8	<3.8
<2.6	5	5

Bromomethane (Methyl Bromide)	<9.3E-06	<2.0E-05	<1.9E-04	<1.5E-05		<2.6
<5.1	<6.1	<3.8

1,3-Butadiene	<3.7E-05	ND   <4.1E-05	ND   <4.0E-05	ND   <4.0E-05		<10.2
ND         <10.3	ND         <10.1	ND           <9.9	ND

2-Butanone (MEK)	<7.2E-05	<8.8E-05	<7.1E-05	<5.7E-05	1.16E-03	<19.9
<22.1	<17.9	14.2	590	590

Carbon  Disulfide	<1.1E-05	<1.3E-05	<1.2E-05	<1.0E-05	7.84E-07	<3.1	<3.2
<3.0	<2.6	20 ppm	60

Carbon Tetrachloride	<7.4E-06	ND   <8.2E-06	ND   <8.2E-06	ND   <7.9E-06
ND    7.84E-07	<2.0	ND           <2.1	ND           <2.0	ND
<2.0	ND                    10 ppm	25 ppm

Chlorobenzene	<7.4E-06	ND   <8.2E-06	ND   <8.1E-06	ND   <7.9E-06	ND
7.04E-06	<2.0	ND           <2.1	ND           <2.0	ND           <2.0	ND
                       350	350

Chloroethane (Ethyl Chloride)	<7.4-E06	ND   <8.2E-06	ND   <8.1E-06	ND
<7.9E-06	ND                   	<2.0	ND           <2.1	ND           <2.0
ND           <2.0	ND

Chloroform	<8.5E-06	<9.3E-06	<9.4E-06	<8.6E-06	2.93E-04	<2.3	<2.3	<2.4
<2.1	(C)240	(C)240

Chloromethane (Methyl Chloride)	<1.0E-05	<1.8E-05	<7.0E-05	<1.2E-05
7.84E-07	<2.8	<4.5	<17.7	<2.9	25 ppm	25 ppm

2-Chloropropane	<7.4E-06	ND   <8.2E-06	ND   <8.1E-06	ND   <7.9E-06		<2.0
ND           <2.1	ND           <2.0	ND           <2.0	ND

Dibromochloromethane	<1.8E-05	<1.8E-05	<1.7E-05	<1.2E-05	7.67E-06

Dibromomethane*	<7.4E-06	ND   <8.2E-06	ND   <8.1E-06	ND   <7.9E-06	ND
               	<2.0	ND           <2.1	ND           <2.0	ND
<2.0	ND

1,2-Dibromoethane (Ethylene 	<7.4E-06	ND   <8.2E-06	ND   <8.1E-06	ND
<7.9E-06	ND                   	<2.0	ND           <2.1	ND           <2.0
ND           <2.0	ND

   Dibromide)*

1,2-Dichlorobenzene	<7.4E-06	ND   <8.2E-06	ND   <8.1E-06	ND   <7.9E-06
ND                  	<2.0	ND           <2.1	ND           <2.0	ND
  <2.0	ND

1,4-Dichlorobenzene	<7.4E-06	ND   <8.2E-06	ND   <8.1E-06	ND   <7.9E-06
ND                  	<2.0	ND           <2.1	ND           <2.0	ND
  <2.0	ND

cis-1,4-Dichloro-2-butene	<7.4E-06	ND   <8.2E-06	ND   <8.1E-06	ND
<7.9E-06	ND                  	<2.0	ND           <2.1	ND           <2.0
ND           <2.0	ND

trans-1,4-Dichloro-2-butene	<7.4E-06	ND   <8.2E-06	ND   <8.1E-06	ND
<7.9E-06	ND                  	<2.0	ND           <2.1	ND           <2.0
ND           <2.0	ND

Dichlorodiflouromethane 	<7.4E-06	ND   <8.2E-06	ND   <8.1E-06	ND
<7.9E-06	ND                  	<2.0	ND           <2.1	ND           <2.0
ND           <2.0	ND

    (Freon 12)

1,1-Dichloroethane	<7.4E-06	ND   <8.2E-06	ND   <8.1E-06	ND   <7.9E-06	ND
   7.84E-07	<2.0	ND           <2.1	ND           <2.0	ND           <2.0
ND

1,2-Dichloroethane (EDC)	<7.4E-06	ND   <8.2E-06	ND   <8.1E-06	ND
<7.9E-06	ND                  	<2.0	ND           <2.1	ND           <2.0
ND           <2.0	ND

1,1-Dichloroethene	<7.4E-06	ND   <8.2E-06	ND   <8.1E-06	ND   <7.9E-06	ND
                 	<2.0	ND           <2.1	ND           <2.0	ND
<2.0	ND

trans-1,2-Dichloroethene	<7.4E-06	ND   <8.2E-06	ND   <8.1E-06	ND
<7.9E-06	ND                  	<2.0	ND           <2.1	ND           <2.0
ND           <2.0	ND

1,2-Dichloropropane	<7.4E-06	ND   <8.2E-06	ND   <8.1E-06	ND   <7.9E-06
ND    7.84E-07	<2.0	ND           <2.1	ND           <2.0	ND
<2.0	ND

cis-1,3-Dichloropropene	<7.4E-06	ND   <8.2E-06	ND   <8.1E-06	ND
<7.9E-06	ND    7.84E-07	<2.0	ND           <2.1	ND           <2.0	ND
     <2.0	ND

trans-1,3-Dichloropropene	<7.4E-06	ND   <8.2E-06	ND   <8.1E-06	ND
<7.9E-06	ND    7.84E-07	<2.0	ND           <2.1	ND           <2.0	ND
     <2.0	ND

Ethylbenzene	<7.4E-06	ND   <8.2E-06	ND   <8.1E-06	ND   <7.9E-06	ND
2.44E-05	<2.0	ND           <2.1	ND           <2.0	ND           <2.0	ND
              500 ppm,	 1800 mg/m

n-Hexane	<7.4E-06	ND   <8.2E-06	ND   <8.1E-06	ND   <7.9E-06	ND
       	<2.0	ND           <2.1	ND           <2.0	ND           <2.0	ND

2-Hexanone	<3.7E-05	<4.1E-05	<4.0E-05	<4.0E-05	7.84E-07

Iodomethane	<7.4E-06	ND   <8.2E-06	ND   <8.1E-06	ND   <7.9E-06	ND
          	<2.0	ND           <2.1	ND           <2.0	ND           <2.0	ND

Methylene Chloride	<7.5E-06	<9.1E-06	<9.7E-06	<7.9E-06	4.59E-02	<2.1
<2.3	<2.4	<2.0	ND                  100 ppm

4-Methyl-2-pentanone (MIBK)	<3.7E-05	ND   <4.1E-05	ND   <4.0E-05	ND
<4.0E-05	ND    7.84E-07	<10.2	ND          <103	ND         <10.1	ND
    <9.9	ND

2-Propanol*	<7.4E-04	ND   <8.2E-04	ND   <8.1E-04	ND   <8.9E-04	ND
          	<204	ND          <206	ND          <203	ND          <222	ND

Styrene	<3.6E-06	<2.7E-05	<2.4E-05	<1.8E-05	1.47E-04	<10.1	<<6.9	<6.0
<4.4	100 ppm

VOLATILE ORGANICS					                                     EMISSION
RATES, g/sec
                                          CONCENTRATIONS, g/dscm

(Cont’d)					HRA   						                Applicable Standards

					Emission					OSHA TWA	   ACGIH TLV&

	  FOB Run	  Run 1  	  Run 2  	   Run 3  	   Rates   	 FOB Run 	  Run 1
	  Run 2  	   Run 3  	PELS, mg/dscm	 Others, mg/dscm

1,1,1,2-Tetrachloethane	<7.4E-06	ND   <8.2E-06	ND   <8.1E-06	ND
<7.9E-06	ND                  	<2.0	ND           <2.1	ND           <2.0
ND           <2.0	ND

1,1,2,2-Tetrachloroethane	<7.4E-06	ND   <8.2E-06	ND   <8.1E-06	ND
<7.9E-06	ND    7.84E-07	<2.0	ND           <2.1	ND           <2.0	ND
     <2.0	ND                            35	35

Tetrachloroethene (PCE)	<7.4E-06	ND   <8.2E-06	ND   <8.1E-06	ND
<7.9E-06	ND    8.84E-07	<2.0	ND           <2.1	ND           <2.0	ND
     <2.0	ND

Toluene	<1.1-E05	<8.4E-06	<8.2E-06	<7.9E-06	2.37E-02	<3.1	<2.1	<2.1	<2.0
200 ppm	750

1,1,1-Trichloroethane (TCA)	<7.4E-06	ND   <8.2E-06	ND   <8.1E-06	ND
<7.9E-06	ND    1.28E-04	<2.0	ND           <2.1	ND           <2.0	ND
     <2.0	ND                        1900	1900

1,1,2-Trichloroethane	<7.4E-06	ND   <8.2E-06	ND   <8.1E-06	ND   <7.9E-06
ND                  	<2.0	ND           <2.1	ND           <2.0	ND
  <2.0	ND                            45	45

Trichlorethene (TCE)	<7.4E-06	ND   <8.2E-06	ND   <8.1E-06	ND   <7.9E-06
ND                  	<2.0	ND           <2.1	ND           <2.0	ND
  <2.0	ND

1,2,3-Trichloropropane	<7.4E-06	ND   <8.2E-06	ND   <8.1E-06	ND
<7.9E-06	ND                  	<2.0	ND           <2.1	ND           <2.0
ND           <2.0	ND

Trichlorofluoromethane	<7.4E-06	ND   <8.2E-06	ND   <8.1E-06	ND
<7.9E-06	ND                  	<2.0	ND           <2.1	ND           <2.0
ND           <2.0	ND

1,1,2-Trichloro-1,2,2-Trifluoro-	<7.4E-06	ND   <8.2E-06	ND   <8.1E-06	ND
  <7.9E-06	ND                  	<2.0	ND           <2.1	ND           <2.0
ND           <2.0	ND

   ethane (Freon 113)

Vinyl Acetate	<3.7E-05	ND   <4.1E-05	ND   <4.0E-05	ND   <4.0E-05	ND
7.84E-07	<10.2	ND          <103	ND         <10.1	ND           <9.9	ND

Vinyl Chloride	<7.4E-06	ND   <8.2E-06	ND   <8.1E-06	ND   <7.9E-06	ND
7.84E-07	<2.0	ND           <2.1	ND           <2.0	ND           <2.0	ND

m/p-Xylene	<7.4E-06	ND   <8.2E-06	ND   <8.1E-06	ND   <7.9E-06	ND
1.73E-05	*                       <2.0	ND           <2.1	ND
<2.0	ND           <2.0	ND

o-Xylene	<7.4E-06	ND   <8.2E-06	ND   <8.1E-06	ND   <7.9E-06	ND
1.73E-05	*                       <2.0	ND           <2.1	ND
<2.0	ND           <2.0	ND

* HRA Emissions Rate was based in total Xylenes

SEMIVOLATILE ORGANICS

					                            ORGANICS EMISSION RATE, g.sec

      ORGANICS CONCENTRATION, g/dscm

					HRA  						                Applicable Standards

					Emission					OSHA TWA	   ACGIH TLV&

	  FOB Run	  Run 1  	  Run 2  	   Run 3  	   Rates   	 FOB Run 	  Run 1
	  Run 2  	   Run 3  	PELS, mg/dscm	 Others, mg/dscm

Acenaphthene	<2.0E-05	ND   <2.0E-05	ND   <2.0E-05	ND   <2.0E-05	ND
           	<5.6	ND           <5.1	ND           <5.0	ND           <4.9
ND

Acenaphthylene	<2.0E-05	ND   <2.0E-05	ND   <2.0E-05	ND   <2.0E-05	ND
             	<5.6	ND           <5.1	ND           <5.0	ND           <4.9
ND

Acetophenone*	<2.1E-05	ND   <2.1E-05	ND   <2.1E-05	ND   <2.1E-05	ND
            	<6.0	ND           <5.6	ND           <5.3	ND           <5.2
ND

2-Acetoaminofluorene*	<2.0E-04	ND   <2.0E-04	ND   <2.0E-04	ND   <2.0E-04
ND                  	<55.8	ND         <50.6	ND         <50.0	ND
<48.7	ND

4-Aminobiphenyl*	<9.8E-05	ND   <9.8E-05	ND   <9.9E-05	ND   <9.8E-05	ND
               	<27.9	ND         <25.3	ND         <25.0	ND         <24.3
ND

3-Amino-9-carbazole*	<2.0E-04	ND   <2.0E-04	ND   <2.0E-04	ND   <2.0E-04
ND                  	<55.8	ND         <50.6	ND         <50.0	ND
<48.7	ND

Aniline	<2.0E-05	ND   <2.0E-05	ND   <2.0E-05	ND   <2.0E-05	ND
      	<5.6	ND           <5.1	ND           <5.0	ND           <4.9	ND

Anthracene	<2.0E-05	ND   <2.0E-05	ND   <2.0E-05	ND   <2.0E-05	ND
         	<5.6	ND           <5.1	ND           <5.0	ND           <4.9	ND
                    [430]

Aramite*	<3.9E-05	ND   <3.9E-05	ND   <3.9E-05	ND   <3.9E-05	ND
       	<11.2	ND         <10.1	ND         <10.0	ND           <9.7	ND

Benzaldehyde*	<4.0E-05	ND   <4.0E-05	ND   <4.1E-05	ND   <4.2E-05	ND
            	<11.4	ND         <10.3	ND         <10.3	ND         <10.4	ND

Benzenethiol*	<2.0E-04	ND   <2.0E-04	ND   <2.0E-04	ND   <2.0E-04	ND
            	<55.8	ND         <50.6	ND         <50.0	ND         <48.7	ND

Benzidine*	<2.0E-04	ND   <2.0E-04	ND   <2.0E-04	ND   <2.0E-04	ND
         	<55.8	ND         <50.6	ND         <50.0	ND         <48.7	ND

Benzo(a)anthracene	<2.0E-05	ND   <2.0E-05	ND   <2.0E-05	ND   <2.0E-05	ND
                 	<5.6	ND           <5.1	ND           <5.0	ND
<4.9	ND

Benzo(b)flouranthenes	<2.0E-05	ND   <2.0E-05	ND   <2.0E-05	ND   <2.0E-05
ND                  	<5.6	ND           <5.1	ND           <5.0	ND
  <4.9	ND

Benzo(j)flouranthenes	<2.0E-05	ND   <2.0E-05	ND   <2.0E-05	ND   <2.0E-05
ND                  	<5.6	ND           <5.1	ND           <5.0	ND
  <4.9	ND

Benzo(k)flouranthenes	<2.0E-05	ND   <2.0E-05	ND   <2.0E-05	ND   <2.0E-05
ND                  	<5.6	ND           <5.1	ND           <5.0	ND
  <4.9	ND

Benzo(g,h,i)perylene	<2.0E-05	ND   <2.0E-05	ND   <2.0E-05	ND   <2.0E-05
ND                  	<5.6	ND           <5.1	ND           <5.0	ND
  <4.9	ND

SEMIVOLATILE ORGANICS (cont’d)

					                            ORGANICS EMISSION RATE, g.sec

      ORGANICS CONCENTRATION, g/dscm

					HRA  						                Applicable Standards

					Emission					OSHA TWA	   ACGIH TLV&

	  FOB Run	  Run 1  	  Run 2  	   Run 3  	   Rates   	 FOB Run 	  Run 1
	  Run 2  	   Run 3  	PELS, mg/dscm	 Others, mg/dscm

Benzo(a)pyrene	<2.0E-05	ND   <2.0E-05	ND   <2.0E-05	ND   <2.0E-05	ND
             	<5.6	ND           <5.1	ND           <5.0	ND           <4.9
ND                          coal	coal

Benzo(e)pyrene	<2.0E-05	ND   <2.0E-05	ND   <2.0E-05	ND   <2.0E-05	ND
             	<5.6	ND           <5.1	ND           <5.0	ND           <4.9
ND                          coal	coal

Benzoic acid	<2.0E-04	ND   <2.0E-04	ND   <2.0E-04	ND   <2.0E-04	ND
9.10E-04	<55.8	ND         <50.6	ND         <50.0	ND         <48.7	ND
              [2530]10

Benzyl alcohol	<2.0E-05	ND   <2.0E-05	ND   <2.0E-05	ND   <2.0E-05	ND
4.21E-03	<5.6	ND           <5.1	ND           <5.0	ND           <4.9	ND
                 [4354]

Biphenyl	<2.0E-05	ND   <2.0E-05	ND   <2.0E-05	ND   <2.0E-05	ND
       	<5.6	ND           <5.1	ND           <5.0	ND           <4.9	ND

4-Bromophenyl phenyl ether	<2.0E-05	ND   <2.0E-05	ND   <2.0E-05	ND
<2.0E-05	ND                  	<5.6	ND           <5.1	ND           <5.0
ND           <4.9	ND

2-sec-Butyl-4,6-dinitro-phenol*	<3.9E-05	ND   <3.9E-05	ND   <3.9E-05	ND
 <3.9E-05	ND                  	<11.2	ND         <10.1	ND         <10.0
ND           <9.7	ND

Chloroaniline	<2.0E-05	ND   <2.0E-05	ND   <2.0E-05	ND   <2.0E-05	ND
            	<5.6	ND           <5.1	ND           <5.0	ND           <4.9
ND

Chlorobenzilate	<2.0E-05	ND   <2.0E-05	ND   <2.0E-05	ND   <2.0E-05	ND
              	<5.6	ND           <5.1	ND           <5.0	ND
<4.9	ND

bis(2-Chloroethoxy)methane	<2.0E-05	ND   <2.0E-05	ND   <2.0E-05	ND
<2.0E-05	ND                  	<5.6	ND           <5.1	ND           <5.0
ND           <4.9	ND

bis(2-Chloroethyl)ether	<2.0E-05	ND   <2.0E-05	ND   <2.0E-05	ND
<2.0E-05	ND                  	<5.6	ND           <5.1	ND           <5.0
ND           <4.9	ND

4-Chloro-3-methylphenol	<2.0E-05	ND   <2.0E-05	ND   <2.0E-05	ND
<2.0E-05	ND                  	<5.6	ND           <5.1	ND           <5.0
ND           <4.9	ND

1-Chloronaphthalene	<2.0E-05	ND   <2.0E-05	ND   <2.0E-05	ND   <2.0E-05
ND                  	<5.6	ND           <5.1	ND           <5.0	ND
  <4.9	ND

2-Chloronaphthalene	<2.0E-05	ND   <2.0E-05	ND   <2.0E-05	ND   <2.0E-05
ND                  	<5.6	ND           <5.1	ND           <5.0	ND
  <4.9	ND

2-Chlorophenol	<2.0E-05	ND   <2.0E-05	ND   <2.0E-05	ND   <2.0E-05	ND
             	<5.6	ND           <5.1	ND           <5.0	ND           <4.9
ND

4-Chlorophenyl phenyl ether	<2.0E-05	ND   <2.0E-05	ND   <2.0E-05	ND
<2.0E-05	ND                  	<5.6	ND           <5.1	ND           <5.0
ND           <4.9	ND

2,2'-Oxybis(1-Chloroprpane)	<2.0E-05	ND   <2.0E-05	ND   <2.0E-05	ND
<2.0E-05	ND                  	<5.6	ND           <5.1	ND           <5.0
ND           <4.9	ND

Chrysene	<2.0E-05	ND   <2.0E-05	ND   <2.0E-05	ND   <2.0E-05	ND
       	<5.6	ND           <5.1	ND           <5.0	ND           <4.9	ND
                      coal	2001

4,4'-DDE*	<2.0E-04	ND   <2.0E-04	ND   <2.0E-04	ND   <2.0E-04	ND
        	<55.8	ND         <50.6	ND         <50.0	ND         <48.7	ND

Diallate*	<3.9E-05	ND   <3.9E-05	ND   <3.9E-05	ND   <3.9E-05	ND
        	<11.2	ND         <10.1	ND         <10.0	ND           <9.7	ND

Dibenz(a,h)anthracene	<2.0E-05	ND   <2.0E-05	ND   <2.0E-05	ND   <2.0E-05
ND                  	<5.6	ND           <5.1	ND           <5.0	ND
  <4.9	ND

Dibenz(a,j)acridine	<2.0E-04	ND   <2.0E-04	ND   <2.0E-04	ND   <2.0E-04
ND                  	<55.8	ND         <50.6	ND         <50.0	ND
<48.7	ND

Dibenzofuran	<2.0E-05	ND   <2.0E-05	ND   <2.0E-05	ND   <2.0E-05	ND
           	<5.6	ND           <5.1	ND           <5.0	ND           <4.9
ND

DBCP (1,2-Dibromo-3-	<2.0E-04	ND   <2.0E-04	ND   <2.0E-04	ND   <2.0E-04
ND                  	<55.8	ND         <50.6	ND         <50.0	ND
<48.7	ND

   Chloropropane*)

Di-n-butyl phthalate	<2.0E-05	ND   <2.0E-05	ND   <2.0E-05	ND   <2.0E-05
ND   1.30E-05	<5.6	ND           <5.1	ND           <5.0	ND           <4.9
ND

1,2-Dichlorobenzene	<2.0E-05	ND   <2.0E-05	ND   <2.0E-05	ND   <2.0E-05
ND                  	<5.6	ND           <5.1	ND           <5.0	ND
  <4.9	ND                     (C)300	(C)300

1,3-Dichlorobenzene	<2.0E-05	ND   <2.0E-05	ND   <2.0E-05	ND   <2.0E-05
ND                  	<5.6	ND           <5.1	ND           <5.0	ND
  <4.9	ND

1,4-Dichlorobenzene	<2.0E-05	ND   <2.0E-05	ND   <2.0E-05	ND   <2.0E-05
ND                  	<5.6	ND           <5.1	ND           <5.0	ND
  <4.9	ND                          450	450

3,3'-Dichlorobenzidine	<5.9E-05	ND   <5.9E-05	ND   <5.9E-05	ND
<5.9E-05	ND                  	<16.7	ND         <15.2	ND         <15.0	ND
        <14.6	ND                                	§1926.1107a

2,4-Dichlorophenol*	<2.0E-05	ND   <2.0E-05	ND   <2.0E-05	ND   <2.0E-05
ND                  	<5.6	ND           <5.1	ND           <5.0	ND
  <4.9	ND                          450	450

2,6-Dichlorophenol*	<2.0E-05	ND   <2.0E-05	ND   <2.0E-05	ND   <2.0E-05
ND                  	<5.6	ND           <5.1	ND           <5.0	ND
  <4.9	ND                          450	450

Diethyl phthalate	<2.0E-05	ND   <2.0E-05	ND   <2.0E-05	ND   <2.0E-05	ND
 7.52E-06	<5.6	ND           <5.1	ND           <5.0	ND           <4.9	ND

Dihydrosafrole*	<2.0E-04	ND   <2.0E-04	ND   <2.0E-04	ND   <2.0E-04	ND
              	<55.8	ND         <50.6	ND         <50.0	ND         <48.7
ND

N,N’-Diisopropylcarbodiimide*	<2.0E-04	ND   <2.0E-04	ND   <2.0E-04	ND
 <2.0E-04	ND                  	<55.8	ND         <50.6	ND         <50.0
ND         <48.7	ND

Diisopropyl methyl phosphate*	<2.0E-04	ND   <2.0E-04	ND   <2.0E-04	ND
<2.0E-04	ND                  	<55.8	ND         <50.6	ND         <50.0	ND
        <48.7	ND

SEMIVOLATILE ORGANICS (cont’d)

					                            ORGANICS EMISSION RATE, g.sec

      ORGANICS CONCENTRATION, g/dscm

					HRA  						                Applicable Standards

					Emission					OSHA TWA	   ACGIH TLV&

	  FOB Run	  Run 1  	  Run 2  	   Run 3  	   Rates   	 FOB Run 	  Run 1
	  Run 2  	   Run 3  	PELS, mg/dscm	 Others, mg/dscm

p-Dimethylaminoazobenzene*	<3.9E-05	ND   <3.9E-05	ND   <3.9E-05	ND
<3.9E-05	ND                  	<11.2	ND         <10.1	ND         <10.0	ND
          <9.7	ND

7,12-Dimethylbenz(a)anthracene*	<3.9E-05	ND   <3.9E-05	ND   <3.9E-05	ND
 <3.9E-05	ND                  	<11.2	ND         <10.1	ND         <10.0
ND           <9.7	ND

3,3'-Dimethylbenzidine*	<9.8E-05	ND   <9.8E-05	ND   <9.9E-05	ND
<9.8E-05	ND                  	<27.9	ND         <25.3	ND         <25.0	ND
        <24.3	ND

a,a-Dimethylphenethyl-amine*	<9.8E-05	ND   <9.8E-05	ND   <9.9E-05	ND
<9.8E-05	ND                  	<27.9	ND         <25.3	ND         <25.0	ND
        <24.3	ND

2,4-Dimethylphenol*	<2.0E-05	ND   <2.0E-05	ND   <2.0E-05	ND   <2.0E-05
ND                  	<5.6	ND           <5.1	ND           <5.0	ND
  <4.9	ND

Dimethyl phthalate	<1.1E-04	ND   <1.2E-04	ND   <1.3E-04	ND   <1.1E-05	ND
  5.36E-04	<31.1	ND         <31.7	ND         <33.3	ND         <28.4	ND

1,3-Dinitrobenzene*	<2.0E-05	ND   <2.0E-05	ND   <2.0E-05	ND   <2.0E-05
ND                  	<5.6	ND           <5.1	ND           <5.0	ND
  <4.9	ND

4,6-Dinitro-2-methylphenol*	<9.8E-05	ND   <9.8E-05	ND   <9.9E-05	ND
<9.8E-05	ND                  	<27.9	ND         <25.3	ND         <25.0	ND
        <24.3	ND

2,4-Dinitrophenol*	<9.8E-05	ND   <9.8E-05	ND   <9.9E-05	ND   <9.8E-05	ND
                 	<27.9	ND         <25.3	ND         <25.0	ND
<24.3	ND

2,6-Dinitrotoluene	<2.0E-05	ND   <2.0E-05	ND   <2.0E-05	ND   <2.0E-05	ND
                 	<5.6	ND           <5.1	ND           <5.0	ND
<4.9	ND                           1.5	1.5

Dioxathion*	<2.0E-04	ND   <2.0E-04	ND   <2.0E-04	ND   <2.0E-04	ND
          	<55.8	ND         <50.6	ND         <50.0	ND         <48.7	ND

Di-n-octyl phthalate	<2.0E-05	ND   <2.0E-05	ND   <2.0E-05	ND   <2.0E-05
ND   1.83E-06	<5.6	ND           <5.1	ND           <5.0	ND           <4.9
ND                    [6513]

1,2-Diphenylhydrazine*	<2.0E-05	ND   <2.0E-05	ND   <2.0E-05	ND
<2.0E-05	ND                  	<5.6	ND           <5.1	ND           <5.0
ND           <4.9	ND

Diphenylamine*	<2.0E-05	ND   <2.0E-05	ND   <2.0E-05	ND   <2.0E-05	ND
             	<5.6	ND           <5.1	ND           <5.0	ND           <4.9
ND

bis(2-Ethyhexyl)phthalate	<3.1E-05	 <2.0E-05	ND   <2.0E-05	ND   <2.0E-05
ND   1.35E-04	<8.7	<5.1	ND           <5.0	ND           <4.9	ND
                   5	5

Ethyl methanesulfonate*	<2.0E-05	ND   <2.0E-05	ND   <2.0E-05	ND
<2.0E-05	ND                  	<5.6	ND           <5.1	ND           <5.0
ND           <4.9	ND

Ethyl parathion*	<2.0E-04	ND   <2.0E-04	ND   <2.0E-04	ND   <2.0E-04	ND
               	<55.8	ND         <50.6	ND         <50.0	ND         <48.7
ND

Fluoranthene	<2.0E-05	ND   <2.0E-05	ND   <2.0E-05	ND   <2.0E-05	ND
           	<5.6	ND           <5.1	ND           <5.0	ND           <4.9
ND                   [2000]

Fluorene	<2.0E-05	ND   <2.0E-05	ND   <2.0E-05	ND   <2.0E-05	ND
       	<5.6	ND           <5.1	ND           <5.0	ND           <4.9	ND

Heptachlor*	<2.0E-04	ND   <2.0E-04	ND   <2.0E-04	ND   <2.0E-04	ND
          	<55.8	ND         <50.6	ND         <50.0	ND         <48.7	ND

Hexachlorobenzene	<2.0E-05	ND   <2.0E-05	ND   <2.0E-05	ND   <2.0E-05	ND
                	<5.6	ND           <5.1	ND           <5.0	ND
<4.9	ND

Hexachlorobutadiene	<2.0E-05	ND   <2.0E-05	ND   <2.0E-05	ND   <2.0E-05
ND                  	<5.6	ND           <5.1	ND           <5.0	ND
  <4.9	ND

Hexachlorocyclopentadiene	<9.8E-05	ND   <9.8E-05	ND   <9.9E-05	ND
<9.8E-05	ND                  	<27.9	ND         <25.3	ND         <25.0	ND
        <24.3	ND

Hexachloroethane	<2.0E-05	ND   <2.0E-05	ND   <2.0E-05	ND   <2.0E-05	ND
               	<5.6	ND           <5.1	ND           <5.0	ND
<4.9	ND

Hexachlorophene*	<2.0E-04	ND   <2.0E-04	ND   <2.0E-04	ND   <2.0E-04	ND
               	<55.8	ND         <50.6	ND         <50.0	ND         <48.7
ND

Hexachloropropene*	<2.0E-04	ND   <2.0E-04	ND   <2.0E-04	ND   <2.0E-04	ND
                 	<55.8	ND         <50.6	ND         <50.0	ND
<48.7	ND

Indeno(1,2,3-cd)pyrene	<2.0E-05	ND   <2.0E-05	ND   <2.0E-05	ND
<2.0E-05	ND                  	<5.6	ND           <5.1	ND           <5.0
ND           <4.9	ND

Isophorone	<2.0E-05	ND   <2.0E-05	ND   <2.0E-05	ND   <2.0E-05	ND
         	<5.6	ND           <5.1	ND           <5.0	ND           <4.9	ND
                        140	140

Isosafrole*	<3.9E-05	ND   <3.9E-05	ND   <3.9E-05	ND   <3.9E-05	ND
          	<11.2	ND         <10.1	ND         <10.0	ND           <9.7	ND

Methapyrilene*	<9.8E-05	ND   <9.8E-05	ND   <9.9E-05	ND   <9.8E-05	ND
             	<27.9	ND         <25.3	ND         <25.0	ND         <24.3
ND

Methoxychlor*	<2.0E-04	ND   <2.0E-04	ND   <2.0E-04	ND   <2.0E-04	ND
            	<55.8	ND         <50.6	ND         <50.0	ND         <48.7	ND

3-Methylcholanthrene*	<3.9E-05	ND   <3.9E-05	ND   <3.9E-05	ND   <3.9E-05
ND                  	<11.2	ND         <10.1	ND         <10.0	ND
 <9.7	ND

Methyl cyclohexane	<2.0E-04	ND   <2.0E-04	ND   <2.0E-04	ND   <2.0E-04	ND
                 	<55.8	ND         <50.6	ND         <50.0	ND
<48.7	ND

Methyl methanesulfonate*	<2.0E-05	ND   <2.0E-05	ND   <2.0E-05	ND
<2.0E-05	ND                  	<5.6	ND           <5.1	ND           <5.0
ND           <4.9	ND

2-Methylnaphthalene	<2.0E-05	ND   <2.0E-05	ND   <2.0E-05	ND   <2.0E-05
ND                  	<5.6	ND           <5.1	ND           <5.0	ND
  <4.9	ND

2-Methy-5-nitroaniline*	<2.0E-04	ND   <2.0E-04	ND   <2.0E-04	ND
<2.0E-04	ND                  	<55.8	ND         <50.6	ND         <50.0	ND
        <48.7	ND

SEMIVOLATILE ORGANICS (cont’d)

					                            ORGANICS EMISSION RATE, g.sec

      ORGANICS CONCENTRATION, g/dscm

					HRA  						                Applicable Standards

					Emission					OSHA TWA	   ACGIH TLV&

	  FOB Run	  Run 1  	  Run 2  	   Run 3  	   Rates   	 FOB Run 	  Run 1
	  Run 2  	   Run 3  	PELS, mg/dscm	 Others, mg/dscm

2-Methyl phenol	<2.0E-05	ND   <2.0E-05	ND   <2.0E-05	ND   <2.0E-05	ND
1.77E-04	<5.6	ND           <5.1	ND           <5.0	ND           <4.9	ND
                        22

3/4-Methyl phenol	<2.0E-05	ND   <2.0E-05	ND   <2.0E-05	ND   <2.0E-05	ND
 1.46E-04	<5.6	ND           <5.1	ND           <5.0	ND           <4.9	ND
                         22

Naphthalene	<2.0E-05	ND   <2.0E-05	ND   <2.0E-05	ND   <2.0E-05	ND
2.11E-05	<5.6	ND           <5.1	ND           <5.0	ND           <4.9	ND
                         50	50

1,4-Naphthoquinone*	<9.8E-05	ND   <9.8E-05	ND   <9.9E-05	ND   <9.8E-05
ND                  	<27.9	ND         <25.3	ND         <25.0	ND
<24.3	ND

1-Naphthylamine*	<2.0E-05	ND   <2.0E-05	ND   <2.0E-05	ND   <2.0E-05	ND
               	<5.6	ND           <5.1	ND           <5.0	ND
<4.9	ND

2-Naphthylamine*	<2.0E-05	ND   <2.0E-05	ND   <2.0E-05	ND   <2.0E-05	ND
               	<5.6	ND           <5.1	ND           <5.0	ND
<4.9	ND

5-Nitroacenapthene*	<2.0E-04	ND   <2.0E-04	ND   <2.0E-04	ND   <2.0E-04
ND                  	<55.8	ND         <50.6	ND         <50.0	ND
<48.7	ND

2-Nitroaniline*	<9.8E-05	ND   <9.8E-05	ND   <9.9E-05	ND   <9.8E-05	ND
              	<27.9	ND         <25.3	ND         <25.0	ND         <24.3
ND

3-Nitroaniline*	<9.8E-05	ND   <9.8E-05	ND   <9.9E-05	ND   <9.8E-05	ND
              	<27.9	ND         <25.3	ND         <25.0	ND         <24.3
ND

4-Nitroaniline*	<9.8E-05	ND   <9.8E-05	ND   <9.9E-05	ND   <9.8E-05	ND
              	<27.9	ND         <25.3	ND         <25.0	ND         <24.3
ND

Nitrobenzene	<2.0E-05	ND   <2.0E-05	ND   <2.0E-05	ND   <2.0E-05	ND
           	<5.6	ND           <5.1	ND           <5.0	ND           <4.9
ND                              5	5

2-Nitrophenol*	<2.0E-05	ND   <2.0E-05	ND   <2.0E-05	ND   <2.0E-05	ND
             	<5.6	ND           <5.1	ND           <5.0	ND           <4.9
ND

4-Nitrophenol*	<9.8E-05	ND   <9.8E-05	ND   <9.9E-05	ND   <9.8E-05	ND
             	<27.9	ND         <25.3	ND         <25.0	ND         <24.3
ND

4-Nitroquinoline-1-oxide*	<2.0E-04	ND   <2.0E-04	ND   <2.0E-04	ND
<2.0E-04	ND                  	<55.8	ND         <50.6	ND         <50.0	ND
        <48.7	ND

N-Nitroso-di-n-butylamine*	<2.0E-05	ND   <2.0E-05	ND   <2.0E-05	ND
<2.0E-05	ND                  	<5.6	ND           <5.1	ND           <5.0
ND           <4.9	ND

N-Nitrosodiethylamine*	<2.0E-05	ND   <2.0E-05	ND   <2.0E-05	ND
<2.0E-05	ND                  	<5.6	ND           <5.1	ND           <5.0
ND           <4.9	ND

N-Nitrosodimethylamine*	<2.0E-05	ND   <2.0E-05	ND   <2.0E-05	ND
<2.0E-05	ND                  	<5.6	ND           <5.1	ND           <5.0
ND           <4.9	ND

N-Nitrosodiphenylamine*	<2.0E-05	ND   <2.0E-05	ND   <2.0E-05	ND
<2.0E-05	ND                  	<5.6	ND           <5.1	ND           <5.0
ND           <4.9	ND

N-Nitroso-di-n-propylamine*	<2.0E-05	ND   <2.0E-05	ND   <2.0E-05	ND
<2.0E-05	ND                  	<5.6	ND           <5.1	ND           <5.0
ND           <4.9	ND

N-Nitrosomethylethylamine*	<2.0E-05	ND   <2.0E-05	ND   <2.0E-05	ND
<2.0E-05	ND                  	<5.6	ND           <5.1	ND           <5.0
ND           <4.9	ND

N-Nitrosomorpholine*	<2.0E-05	ND   <2.0E-05	ND   <2.0E-05	ND   <2.0E-05
ND                  	<5.6	ND           <5.1	ND           <5.0	ND
  <4.9	ND

N-Nitrosopiperidine*	<2.0E-05	ND   <2.0E-05	ND   <2.0E-05	ND   <2.0E-05
ND                  	<5.6	ND           <5.1	ND           <5.0	ND
  <4.9	ND

N-Nitrosopyrrolidine*	<2.0E-05	ND   <2.0E-05	ND   <2.0E-05	ND   <2.0E-05
ND                  	<5.6	ND           <5.1	ND           <5.0	ND
  <4.9	ND

N-Nitro-o-toluidine*	<3.9E-05	ND   <3.9E-05	ND   <3.9E-05	ND   <3.9E-05
ND                  	<11.2	ND         <10.1	ND         <10.0	ND
 <9.7	ND

Pentachlorobenzene*	<2.0E-05	ND   <2.0E-05	ND   <2.0E-05	ND   <2.0E-05
ND                  	<5.6	ND           <5.1	ND           <5.0	ND
  <4.9	ND

Pentachloroethane*	<9.8E-05	ND   <9.8E-05	ND   <9.9E-05	ND   <9.8E-05	ND
                 	<27.9	ND         <25.3	ND         <25.0	ND
<24.3	ND

Pentachloronitrobenzene (PNCB)*	<9.8E-05	ND   <9.8E-05	ND   <9.9E-05	ND
 <9.8E-05	ND                  	<27.9	ND         <25.3	ND         <25.0
ND         <24.3	ND

Pentachlorophenol*	<9.8E-05	ND   <9.8E-05	ND   <9.9E-05	ND   <9.8E-05	ND
                 	<27.9	ND         <25.3	ND         <25.0	ND
<24.3	ND

Phenacetin*	<3.9E-05	ND   <3.9E-05	ND   <3.9E-05	ND   <3.9E-05	ND
          	<11.2	ND         <10.1	ND         <10.0	ND           <9.7	ND

Phenanthrene	<2.0E-05	ND   <2.0E-05	ND   <2.0E-05	ND   <2.0E-05	ND
           	<5.6	ND           <5.1	ND           <5.0	ND           <4.9
ND                        [50]

Phenol	<2.0E-05	ND   <2.0E-05	ND   <2.0E-05	ND   <2.0E-05	ND
     	<5.6	ND           <5.1	ND           <5.0	ND           <4.9	ND
                      19	19

p-Phenylenediamine*	<2.0E-05	ND   <2.0E-05	ND   <2.0E-05	ND   <2.0E-05
ND                  	<5.6	ND           <5.1	ND           <5.0	ND
  <4.9	ND

2-Picoline*	<3.9E-05	ND   <3.9E-05	ND   <3.9E-05	ND   <3.9E-05	ND
          	<11.2	ND         <10.1	ND         <10.0	ND           <9.7	ND

Pronamine*	<3.9E-05	ND   <3.9E-05	ND   <3.9E-05	ND   <3.9E-05	ND
         	<11.2	ND         <10.1	ND         <10.0	ND           <9.7	ND

SEMIVOLATILE ORGANICS (cont’d)

g.sec
                      ORGANICS CONCENTRATION, g/dscm

					HRA  						                Applicable Standards

					Emission					OSHA TWA	   ACGIH TLV&

	  FOB Run	  Run 1  	  Run 2  	   Run 3  	   Rates   	 FOB Run 	  Run 1
	  Run 2  	   Run 3  	PELS, mg/dscm	 Others, mg/dscm

Pyrene	<2.0E-05	ND   <2.0E-05	ND   <2.0E-05	ND   <2.0E-05	ND
     	<5.6	ND           <5.1	ND           <5.0	ND           <4.9	ND
                [170]

Pyridine*	<3.9E-05	ND   <3.9E-05	ND   <3.9E-05	ND   <3.9E-05	ND
        	<11.2	ND         <10.1	ND         <10.0	ND           <9.7	ND
                 [170]

Quinoline*	<2.0E-04	ND   <2.0E-04	ND   <2.0E-04	ND   <2.0E-04	ND
         	<55.8	ND         <50.6	ND         <50.0	ND         <48.7	ND

Safrole*	<3.9E-05	ND   <3.9E-05	ND   <3.9E-05	ND   <3.9E-05	ND
       	<11.2	ND         <10.1	ND         <10.0	ND           <9.7	ND

1,2,4,5-Tetrachlorobenzene*	<2.0E-05	ND   <2.0E-05	ND   <2.0E-05	ND
<2.0E-05	ND                  	<5.6	ND           <5.1	ND           <5.0
ND           <4.9	ND

2,3,4,5-Tetrachlorophenol*	<9.8E-05	ND   <9.8E-05	ND   <9.9E-05	ND
<9.8E-05	ND                  	<27.9	ND         <25.3	ND         <25.0	ND
        <24.3	ND

p-Toluidine*	<2.0E-04	ND   <2.0E-04	ND   <2.0E-04	ND   <2.0E-04	ND
           	<55.8	ND         <50.6	ND         <50.0	ND         <48.7	ND

2-Toluidine*	<3.9E-05	ND   <3.9E-05	ND   <3.9E-05	ND   <3.9E-05	ND
           	<11.2	ND         <10.1	ND         <10.0	ND           <9.7	ND

Tributylamine*	<2.0E-04	ND   <2.0E-04	ND   <2.0E-04	ND   <2.0E-04	ND
             	<55.8	ND         <50.6	ND         <50.0	ND         <48.7
ND

1,2,4-Trichlorobenzene	<2.0E-05	ND   <2.0E-05	ND   <2.0E-05	ND