UNITED STATES ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY ANN ARBOR, MI 48105 OFFICE OF AIR AND RADIATION MEMORANDUM February 11, 2005 SUBJECT: Meeting with Engine Manufacturers Association Regarding EPA's Proposed Technical Amendments FROM: Alan Stout, Mechanical Engineer Assessment and Standards Division TO: Docket OAR 2004 0017 On February 8, we met with representatives of the Engine Manufacturers Association and member companies to discuss issues related to the proposed technical amendments for highway and nonroad engine programs. The agenda for the meeting and a handout of discussion material is attached.

Attachments Attending: EPA Glenn Passavant Alan Stout Bill Charmley Jean Marie Revelt Chuck Moulis Ed Gardetto EMA Bob Jorgenson, Cummins Bill Passie, Caterpillar John Duerr, DDC Rick Bishop, John Deere Kevin Kokrda, EMA staff Lisa Stegink, EMA counsel Steve Berry, Volvo ( by phone) EPA Tech Amendments EMA EPA Meeting February 8, 2005 Discussion Issues 1. 1065.10( c)   representative testing 2. 1065.12  partial flow sampling systems 3. 1065 definitions   coordination with test cycle development 4. Process/ feedback for use of new test procedures for certification of 2007 on highway and Tier 4 nonroad engines 5. Separate shipment of aftertreatment ( 1068.260 and Part 86) 6. Imported engines: 85.1511( b)( 1)   importation for repairs/ alterations; 1068.315 and1068.325   exemptions; 89.614   importation of incomplete engines; 94.806   importation of incomplete engines 7. 89.913 and 89.914   labeling of certified on highway engines used in nonroad vehicles and equipment 8. 1039.625( j)   reference to 1068.265, rather than 1068.260 9. 89.1003( b)( 7) and 94.1103   labels for older replacement engines 10. 1068.265 and 1039.104   modified designation 11. Regulation of diesel derived natural gas engines 12. 94.904( c)   exemptions 13. 94.912   labeling requirements for land based engines for auxiliary marine 14. 94.1004   maintenance, repair and adjustment of Category 3 engines 15. 94.1103( b)( 3)   replacement engines ( cf. 1068.240( b)( 3) and 89.1003( b)( 7)) 16. 94.9( a)( 3)( ii)   useful life ( cf. 1048.101( g)( 2)) 17. 92.508( e) and 92.511( g)   extension of end of quarter reporting deadline Issues to Confirm 1. Timing for Final Rule: June 3, 2005 2. 1039.705( c)( 4) Calif/ state tracking of federal ABT credits removed 3. Test procedures  Handling of Part 1065 and Part 86 changes 4. New test procedures/ definitions not mandatory until 2010 ( on highway and nonroad Tier 4) 5. E3 duty cycle as option for prop law variable speed marine auxiliary 6. Nonroad useful life   no changes to request for shorter UL EMADOCS: 6564.1 STAFF DRAFT Separate shipment of engine and aftertreatment: Request for comment on Highway Heavy duty Engines Nonroad Tier 4 Final Rule  1068.260( a) EMA Comments on Tech Amendment NPRM EPA concept for Tech Amendment FRM for Highwa Heavy duty Engines Do all of the following: Option A: Option B: Option X. Option Y ( 1) Apply for and receive a certificate of conformity for the engine and its emission control system before shipment receive a certificate of conformity receive a certificate of conformity same as EPA NRT4 ( 1) same as EPA NRT4 ( 1)

( 2) Provide installation instructions in enough detail to ensure that the engine will be in its certified configuration if someone follows these instructions. provide detailed installation instructions provide detailed installation instructions same as EPA NRT4 ( 2) same as EPA NRT4 ( 2)

( 3) Have a contractual agreement with an equipment manufacturer obligating the equipment manufacturer to complete the final assembly of the engine so it is in its certified configuration when installed in the equipment. This agreement must also obligate the equipment manufacturer to provide the affidavits and cooperate with the audits required under paragraph ( a)( 6) of this section. Secure a contractual agreement with the OEM, or similar documentation confirming agreement on aftertreatment application requirements same as EPA NRT4 ( 3) same as EPA NRT4 ( 3) Nonroad Tier 4 Final Rule  1068.260( a) EMA Comments on Tech Amendment NPRM EPA concept for Tech Amendment FRM for Highway Heavy duty Engines ( 4) Include the cost of all aftertreatment components in the cost of the engine. Include the costs of all primary aftertreatment components in the cost of the engine ( does not include shipping costs) You do not need to include the AT cost in the cost of the engine if you ensure through a contractual agreement that the OEM,

or the OEM's supplier, will purchase and install the identical AT part( s)

described in the Application for Certification same as EPA NRT4 ( 4)

( 5) Ship the aftertreatment components directly to the equipment manufacturer, or arrange for separate shipment by the component manufacturer directly to the equipment manufacturer. Ship the aftertreatment components directly to the equipment manufacturer, or make arrangements for separate shipment same as EPA NRT4 ( 5) Nonroad Tier 4 Final Rule  1068.260( a) EMA Comments on Tech Amendment NPRM EPA concept for Tech Amendment FRM for Highway Heavy duty Engines ( 6) Take appropriate additional steps to ensure that all engines will be in their certified configuration when installed by the equipment manufacturer. At a minimum do the following:

( i) Obtain annual affidavits from every equipment manufacturer to whom you, your distributors, or your dealers sell engines under this section. The affidavits must list the part numbers of the aftertreatment devices that equipment manufacturers install on each engine they purchase from you, your distributors, or your dealers under this section.

( ii) If you sell more than 50 engines per model year under this section, you must annually audit four equipment manufacturers to whom you sell engines under this section. To select individual equipment manufacturers,

divide all the affected equipment manufacturers into quartiles based on the number of engines they buy from you; select a single equipment manufacturer from each quartile each model year. Vary the equipment manufacturers you audit from year to year, though you may repeat an audit in a later model year if you find or suspect that a particular equipment manufacturer is not properly installing aftertreatment devices. If you sell engines to fewer than 16 equipment manufacturers under the provisions of this section, you may instead set up a plan to audit each equipment manufacturer on average once every four model years. Audits must involve the assembling companies' facilities, procedures, and production records to monitor their compliance with your instructions, must include investigation of some assembled engines, and must confirm that the number of aftertreatment devices shipped were sufficient for the number of engines produced. Where an equipment manufacturer is not located in the United States, you may conduct the audit at a distribution or port facility in the United States. You must keep records of these audits and provide a report describing any uninstalled or improperly installed aftertreatment components to us within 90 days of the audit.

( iii) If you sell up to 50 engines per model year under this section, you must conduct audits as described in paragraph ( a)( 6)( ii) of this section or propose an alternative plan for ensuring that equipment manufacturers properly install aftertreatment devices. Provide verification of proper application of aftertreatment systems through on of the following methods:

( i) obtaining annual affidavits from OEMs or,

( ii) maintenance of a common engine division equipment division database of aftertreatment part numbers installed with each engines or,

( iii) use of engine software designed to allow for validation that the correct/ certified AT was installed, and, if not, designed to direct ( through fault codes or engine derating) the OEM to correct the conditions;

or,

( iv) other methods approved by the Administrator For non vertically integrated engine truck companies:

same as EPA NRT4 ( 6) i,

ii, and iii For vertically integrated engine truck companies:

send EPA an affidavit stating that EMA item ( ii) is done by the company and stating that the companies assembling " facilities,

procedures, and production records" are sufficient to ensure that each certified engines is installed into a vehicle with the correct AT same as EPA NRT4 ( 6)( i),

no audits required Nonroad Tier 4 Final Rule  1068.260( a) EMA Comments on Tech Amendment NPRM EPA concept for Tech Amendment FRM for Highway Heavy duty Engines ( 7) Describe the following things in your application for certification:

( I) How you plan to use the provisions of this section.

( ii) A detailed plan for auditing equipment manufacturers, as described in paragraph ( a)( 6) of this section.

( iii) All other steps you plan to take under paragraph ( a)( 6) of this section. same as EPA NRT4 ( 7) same as EPA NRT4 ( 7)

( 8) Keep records to document how many engines you produce under this exemption. Also, keep records to document your contractual agreements under paragraph ( a)( 3) of this section. Keep all these records for five years after the end of the model year and make them available to us upon request. same as EPA NRT4 ( 8) same as EPA NRT4 ( 8) Nonroad Tier 4 Final Rule  1068.260( a) EMA Comments on Tech Amendment NPRM EPA concept for Tech Amendment FRM for Highway Heavy duty Engines ( 9) Make sure the engine has the emission control information label we require under the standardsetting part. Apply an additional temporary label or tag in a way that makes it unlikely that the engine will be installed in equipment other than in its certified configuration. The label or tag must identify the engine as incomplete and include a clear statement that failing to install the aftertreatment device, or otherwise bring the engine into its certified configuration, is a violation of federal law subject to civil penalty. tags are not necessary tags are not necessary same as EPA NRT4 ( 9) same as EPA NRT4 ( 9)


[Federal Register Volume 81, Number 124 (Tuesday, June 28, 2016)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Pages 41798-41799]
[FR Doc No: 2016-15184]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION

Federal Aviation Administration

14 CFR Part 71

[Docket No. FAA-2015-3994; Airspace Docket No. 15-ANM-23]

Establishment of Class E Airspace, Shelton, WA

AGENCY: Federal Aviation Administration (FAA), DOT.

ACTION: Final rule.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: This action establishes Class E airspace extending upward from
700 feet above the surface at Sanderson Field Airport, Shelton, WA, to
accommodate new Standard Instrument Approach Procedures developed for
the airport. Controlled airspace is necessary for the safety and
management of Instrument Flight Rules (IFR) operations at the airport.

DATES: Effective 0901 UTC, September 15, 2016. The Director of the
Federal Register approves this incorporation by reference action under
Title 1, Code of Federal Regulations, part 51, subject to the annual
revision of FAA Order 7400.9 and publication of conforming amendments.

ADDRESSES: FAA Order 7400.9Z, Airspace Designations and Reporting
Points, and subsequent amendments can be viewed online at http://www.faa.gov/air_traffic/publications/. For further information, you can
contact the U.S. Department of Transportation, Docket Operations, 1200
New Jersey Avenue SE., West Bldg. Ground Floor Rm W12-140, Washington,
DC 20590; Telephone: 1-800-647-5527, or<PHONE_NUMBER>. The Order is also
available for inspection at the National Archives and Records
Administration (NARA). For information on the availability of FAA Order
7400.9Z at NARA, call<PHONE_NUMBER>, or go to http://www.archives.gov/federal_register/code_of_federal-regulations/ibr_locations.html.
    FAA Order 7400.9, Airspace Designations and Reporting Points, is
published yearly and effective on September 15.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Tom Clark, Federal Aviation
Administration, Operations Support Group, Western Service Center, 1601
Lind Avenue SW., Renton, WA 98057; telephone<PHONE_NUMBER>.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

Authority for This Rulemaking

    The FAA's authority to issue rules regarding aviation safety is
found in Title 49 of the United States Code. Subtitle I, Section 106
describes the authority of the FAA Administrator. Subtitle VII,
Aviation Programs, describes in more detail the scope of the agency's
authority. This rulemaking is promulgated under the authority described
in Subtitle VII, Part A, Subpart I, Section 40103. Under that section,
the FAA is charged with prescribing regulations to assign the use of
airspace necessary to ensure the safety of aircraft and the efficient
use of airspace. This regulation is within the scope of that authority
as it establishes controlled airspace at Sanderson Field Airport,
Shelton, WA.

History

    On January 28, 2016, the FAA published in the Federal Register a
notice of proposed rulemaking (NPRM) to establish Class E airspace
extending upward from 700 feet above the surface at Sanderson Field
Airport, Shelton, WA (81 FR 4903) Docket FAA-2015-3994. Interested
parties were invited to participate in this rulemaking effort by
submitting written comments on the proposal to the FAA. One comment was
received from Joseph Murphy, supporting the proposal.
    Class E airspace designations are published in paragraph 6005 of
FAA Order 7400.9Z, dated August 6, 2015, and effective September 15,
2015, which is incorporated by reference in 14 CFR part 71.1. The Class
E airspace designation listed in this document will be published
subsequently in the Order.

Availability and Summary of Documents for Incorporation by Reference

    This document amends FAA Order 7400.9Z, Airspace Designations and
Reporting Points, dated August 6, 2015, and effective September 15,
2015. FAA Order 7400.9Z is publicly available as listed in the
ADDRESSES section of this document. FAA Order 7400.9Z lists Class A, B,
C, D, and E airspace areas, air traffic service routes, and reporting
points.

The Rule

    This amendment to Title 14, Code of Federal Regulations (14 CFR)
part 71 establishes Class E airspace extending upward from 700 feet
above the surface within a 4-mile radius of the Sanderson Field
Airport, Shelton WA, and that airspace within 1.5 miles either side of
the airport 068[deg] bearing extending from the 4-mile radius to 5
miles northeast of the airport, and that airspace within 2.3 miles
either side of the airport 248[deg] bearing extending from the 4-mile
radius to 9.5 miles southwest of the airport. This airspace is
established to accommodate new Standard Instrument Approach Procedures
developed for the safety and management of Instrument Flight Rules
(IFR) operations at the airport.

Regulatory Notices and Analyses

    The FAA has determined that this regulation only involves an
established body of technical regulations for which frequent and
routine amendments are necessary to keep them operationally current, is
non-controversial and unlikely to result in adverse or negative
comments. It, therefore: (1) Is not a ``significant regulatory action''
under Executive Order 12866; (2) is not a ``significant rule'' under
DOT Regulatory Policies and Procedures (44 FR 11034; February 26,
1979); and (3) does not warrant preparation of a Regulatory Evaluation
as the anticipated impact is so minimal. Since this is a routine matter
that only affects air traffic procedures and air navigation, it is
certified that this rule, when promulgated, does not have a significant
economic impact on a substantial number of small entities under the
criteria of the Regulatory Flexibility Act.

Environmental Review

    The FAA has determined that this action qualifies for categorical
exclusion under the National Environmental Policy Act in accordance
with FAA Order 1050.1F, ``Environmental Impacts: Policies and
Procedures,'' paragraph 5-6.5a. This airspace action is not expected to
cause any potentially significant environmental impacts, and no
extraordinary circumstances exist that warrant preparation of an
environmental assessment.

Lists of Subjects in 14 CFR Part 71

    Airspace, Incorporation by reference, Navigation (air).

Adoption of the Amendment

    In consideration of the foregoing, the Federal Aviation
Administration amends 14 CFR part 71 as follows:

PART 71--DESIGNATION OF CLASS A, B, C, D, AND E AIRSPACE AREAS; AIR
TRAFFIC SERVICE ROUTES; AND REPORTING POINTS

0
1. The authority citation for Part 71 continues to read as follows:

    Authority: 49 U.S.C. 106(f), 106(g); 40103, 40113, 40120; E.O.
10854, 24 FR 9565, 3 CFR, 1959-1963 Comp., p. 389.

Sec.  71.1  [Amended]

0
2. The incorporation by reference in 14 CFR 71.1 of FAA Order 7400.9Z,
Airspace Designations and Reporting Points, dated August 6, 2015, and
effective September 15, 2015, is amended as follows:

Paragraph 6005 Class E Airspace Areas Extending Upward From 700
Feet or More Above the Surface of the Earth.

* * * * *

ANM WA E5 Shelton, WA [New]

Sanderson Field Airport, WA
    (Lat. 47[deg]14'01'' N., long. 123[deg]08'51'' W.)

    That airspace extending upward from 700 feet above the surface
within a 4-mile radius of Sanderson Field Airport, and that airspace
1.5 miles either side of the 068[deg] bearing from airport extending
from the 4-mile radius to 5 miles northeast of the airport, and that
airspace 2.3 miles either side of the 248[deg] bearing from airport
extending from the 4-mile radius to 9.5 miles southwest of the
airport.

    Issued in Seattle, Washington, on June 17, 2016.
Brian J. Johnson,
Acting Manager, Operations Support Group, Western Service Center.
[FR Doc. 2016-15184 Filed 6-27-16; 8:45 am]
 BILLING CODE 4910-13-P


[Federal Register Volume 88, Number 158 (Thursday, August 17, 2023)]
[Notices]
[Page 56018]
[FR Doc No: 2023-17629]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission

[Docket No. RM01-5-000]

Electronic Tariff Filings; Notice of Revised Implementation Guide
for Electronic Filing

    In Order No. 714,\1\ the Commission adopted regulations requiring
tariff and tariff related filings to be made electronically starting
April 1, 2010. Instructions on how to assemble an electronic filing are
provided in the Implementation Guide for Electronic Filing of parts 35,
154, 284, 300, and 341 Tariff Filings (Implementation Guide), located
on FERC's Home Page (https://www.ferc.gov/ferc-online/etariff). The
Implementation Guide has been updated as of August 2023. The updated
Implementation Guide will not be published in the Federal Register, but
the Commission provides all interested persons an opportunity to view
and/or print the updated Implementation Guide via the internet through
FERC's Home Page (http://www.ferc.gov) using the eLibrary link. To
access the document in eLibrary, type the above referenced docket
number, excluding the last three digits, in the docket number field and
follow other directions on the search page.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \1\ Electronic Tariff Filings, Order No. 714, 73 FR 57,515 (Oct.
3, 2008), 124 FERC ] 61,270, FERC Stats. & Regs [Regulations
Preambles] ] 31,276 (2008) (Sept. 19, 2008).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    Take notice that the Implementation Guide has been revised as
follows:
    1. Updated FERC Form(s) expiration dates and public reporting
burden information.\2\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \2\ The FERC Form(s) expiration dates will be updated from time
to time, but each update will not be noticed in the Federal
Register.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    2. Removed outdated software references.
    3. Various updated instructions to comply with the directives in
Order No. 884.\3\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \3\ Revised Filing & Reporting Requirements for Interstate Nat.
Gas Co. Rate Schedules & Tariffs, Order No. 884, 181 FERC ] 61,121
(2022); re'hearing denied 182 FERC ] 61,144 (2023).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    User assistance is available for eLibrary and other aspects of
FERC's website during normal business hours. For assistance, please
contact the Commission's Online Support at 1-866-208-3676 (toll free)
or<PHONE_NUMBER> (email at [email protected]), or the Public
Reference Room at<PHONE_NUMBER>, TTY<PHONE_NUMBER>. Email the Public
Reference Room at [email protected].

    Dated: August 10, 2023.
Debbie-Anne A. Reese,
Deputy Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2023-17629 Filed 8-16-23; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6717-01-P


[Federal Register Volume 76, Number 178 (Wednesday, September 14, 2011)]
[Notices]
[Page 56779]
[FR Doc No: 2011-23415]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY

Federal Emergency Management Agency

[Internal Agency Docket No. FEMA-4022-DR; Docket ID FEMA-2011-0001]

Vermont; Amendment No. 1 to Notice of a Major Disaster
Declaration

AGENCY: Federal Emergency Management Agency, DHS.

ACTION: Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: This notice amends the notice of a major disaster for the
State of Vermont (FEMA-4022-DR), dated September 1, 2011, and related
determinations.

DATES: Effective Date: September 2, 2011.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Peggy Miller, Office of Response and
Recovery, Federal Emergency Management Agency, 500 C Street, SW.,
Washington, DC 20472,<PHONE_NUMBER>.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Notice is hereby given that the incident
period for this declared disaster is now August 27, 2011, and
continuing.

(The following Catalog of Federal Domestic Assistance Numbers (CFDA)
are to be used for reporting and drawing funds: 97.030, Community
Disaster Loans; 97.031, Cora Brown Fund; 97.032, Crisis Counseling;
97.033, Disaster Legal Services; 97.034, Disaster Unemployment
Assistance (DUA); 97.046, Fire Management Assistance Grant; 97.048,
Disaster Housing Assistance to Individuals and Households in
Presidentially Declared Disaster Areas; 97.049, Presidentially
Declared Disaster Assistance--Disaster Housing Operations for
Individuals and Households; 97.050, Presidentially Declared Disaster
Assistance to Individuals and Households--Other Needs; 97.036,
Disaster Grants--Public Assistance (Presidentially Declared
Disasters); 97.039, Hazard Mitigation Grant.)

W. Craig Fugate,
Administrator, Federal Emergency Management Agency.
[FR Doc. 2011-23415 Filed 9-13-11; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 9111-23-P


[Federal Register Volume 76, Number 73 (Friday, April 15, 2011)]
[Notices]
[Page 21414]
[FR Doc No: 2011-9186]

=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

Submission for OMB Review; Comment Request

Upon Written Request, Copies Available From: U.S. Securities and
Exchange Commission, Office of Investor Education and Advocacy,
Washington, DC 20549-0213.

Extension:
    Rule 101, SEC File No. 270-408, OMB Control No. 3235-0464.

    Notice is hereby given that pursuant to the Paperwork Reduction Act
of 1995 (44 U.S.C. 3501 et seq.), the Securities and Exchange
Commission (``Commission'') has submitted to the Office of Management
and Budget (``OMB'') a request for approval of extension of the
existing collection of information provided for in the following rule:
Rule 101 of Regulation M (17 CFR 242.101).
    Rule 101 prohibits distribution participants from purchasing
activities at specified times during a distribution of securities.
Persons otherwise covered by these rules may seek to use several
applicable exceptions such as a calculation of the average daily
trading volume of the securities in distribution, the maintenance of
policies regarding information barriers between their affiliates, and
the maintenance a written policy regarding general compliance with
Regulation M for de minimus transactions.
    There are approximately 1588 respondents per year that require an
aggregate total of 31,309 hours to comply with this rule. Each
respondent makes an estimated 1 annual response. Each response takes
approximately 20 hours to complete. Thus, the total compliance burden
per year is 31,309 burden hours. The total estimated internal labor
compliance cost for the respondents is approximately $1,783,673.73,
resulting in a cost of compliance for the respondent per response of
approximately $1123.22 (i.e., $1,783,673.73/1588 responses).
    An agency may not conduct or sponsor, and a person is not required
to respond to, a collection of information unless it displays a
currently valid control number.
    The public may view the background documentation for this
information collection at the following Web site, http://www.reginfo.gov. Comments should be directed to (i) Desk Officer for
the Securities and Exchange Commission, Office of Information and
Regulatory Affairs, Office of Management and Budget, Room 10102, New
Executive Office Building, Washington, DC 20503 or by sending an e-mail
to<EMAIL_ADDRESS>and (ii) Thomas Bayer, Chief
Information Officer, Securities and Exchange Commission, c/o Remi
Pavlik-Simon, 6432 General Green Way, Alexandria, VA 22312 or send an
e-mail to<EMAIL_ADDRESS>Comments must be submitted within 30
days of this notice.

    Dated: April 11, 2011.
Cathy H. Ahn,
Deputy Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2011-9186 Filed 4-14-11; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 8011-01-P


[Federal Register: April 2, 2010 (Volume 75, Number 63)]
[Proposed Rules]
[Page 16703-16706]
[DOCID:fr02ap10-25]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY

Coast Guard

33 CFR Part 165

[Docket No. USCG-2010-0158]
RIN 1625-AA00

Safety Zone; Wilson Bay, Jacksonville, NC

AGENCY: Coast Guard, DHS.

ACTION: Notice of proposed rulemaking.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Coast Guard proposes to establish a temporary safety zone
on the waters of Wilson Bay at Jacksonville, North Carolina for
training purposes. The safety zone is necessary to provide for the
safety of the general public and exercise participants from potential
hazards associated with low flying helicopters and vessels
participating in this multi agency exercise.

DATES: Comments and related material must be received by the Coast
Guard on or before May 3, 2010.

ADDRESSES: You may submit comments identified by docket number USCG-
2010-0158 using any one of the following methods:
    (1) Federal eRulemaking Portal: http://www.regulations.gov.
    (2) Fax:<PHONE_NUMBER>.
    (3) Mail: Docket Management Facility (M-30), U.S. Department of
Transportation, West Building Ground Floor, Room W12-140, 1200 New
Jersey Avenue, SE., Washington, DC 20590-0001.
    (4) Hand delivery: Same as mail address above, between 9 a.m. and 5
p.m., Monday through Friday, except Federal holidays. The telephone
number is<PHONE_NUMBER>.
    To avoid duplication, please use only one of these four methods.
See the ``Public Participation and Request for Comments'' portion of
the SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION section below for instructions on
submitting comments.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: If you have questions on this proposed
rule, call or e-mail CWO4 Stephen Lyons, Waterways Management Division
Chief, Coast Guard Sector North Carolina; telephone<PHONE_NUMBER>, e-
mail<EMAIL_ADDRESS>If you have questions on viewing or
submitting material to the docket, call Renee V. Wright, Program
Manager, Docket Operations, telephone<PHONE_NUMBER>.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

Public Participation and Request for Comments

    We encourage you to participate in this rulemaking by submitting
comments and related materials. All comments received will be posted
without change to http://www.regulations.gov and will include any
personal information you have provided.

Submitting Comments

    If you submit a comment, please include the docket number for this
rulemaking (USCG-2010-1058), indicate the specific section of this
document to which each comment applies, and provide a reason for each
suggestion or recommendation. You may submit your comments and material
online (via http://www.regulations.gov) or by fax, mail, or hand
delivery, but please use only one of these means. If you submit a
comment online via http://www.regulations.gov, it will be considered
received by the Coast Guard when you successfully transmit the comment.
If you fax, hand deliver, or mail your comment, it will be considered
as having been received by the Coast Guard when it is received at the
Docket Management Facility. We recommend that you include your name and
a mailing address, an e-mail address, or a telephone number in the body
of your document so that we can contact you if we have questions
regarding your submission.
    To submit your comment online, go to http://www.regulations.gov,
click on the ``submit a comment'' box, which will then become
highlighted in blue. In the ``Document Type'' drop down menu select
``Proposed Rule'' and insert ``USCG-2010-0158'' in the ``Keyword'' box.
Click ``Search'' then click on the balloon shape in the ``Actions''
column. If you submit your comments by mail or hand delivery, submit
them in an unbound format, no larger than 8\12\ by 11 inches, suitable
for copying and electronic filing. If you submit comments by mail and
would like to know that they reached the Facility, please enclose a
stamped, self-addressed postcard or envelope. We will consider all
comments and material received during the comment period and may change
the rule based on your comments.

Viewing Comments and Documents

    To view comments, as well as documents mentioned in this preamble
as being available in the docket, go to http://www.regulations.gov,
click on the ``read comments'' box, which will then

become highlighted in blue. In the ``Keyword'' box insert ``USCG-2010-
0158'' and click ``Search.'' Click the ``Open Docket Folder'' in the
``Actions'' column. You may also visit the Docket Management Facility
in Room W12-140 on the ground floor of the Department of Transportation
West Building, 1200 New Jersey Avenue, SE., Washington, DC 20590,
between 9 a.m. and 5 p.m., Monday through Friday, except Federal
holidays. We have an agreement with the Department of Transportation to
use the Docket Management Facility.

Privacy Act

    Anyone can search the electronic form of comments received into any
of our dockets by the name of the individual submitting the comment (or
signing the comment, if submitted on behalf of an association,
business, labor union, etc.). You may review a Privacy Act, systems of
records notice regarding our public dockets in the January 17, 2008,
issue of the Federal Register (73 FR 3316).

Public Meeting

    We do not now plan to hold a public meeting. But you may submit a
request for one using one of the four methods specified under
ADDRESSES. Please explain why you believe a public meeting would be
beneficial. If we determine that one would aid this rulemaking, we will
hold one at a time and place announced by a later notice in the Federal
Register.
    For information on facilities or services for individuals with
disabilities or to request special assistance at the public meeting,
contact CWO4 Stephen Lyons at the telephone number or e-mail address
indicated under the FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT section of this
notice.

Background and Purpose

    The Onslow County North Carolina Emergency Services will be
conducting a multi agency exercise to test response capabilities of
water rescue services in a mass casualty scenario on the waters of
Wilson Bay, Onslow County, North Carolina from 6 a.m. to 5 p.m. June 9,
2010. The exercise is designed to train and test air and surface
personnel in the judgmental decisionmaking process necessary to safely
and effectively respond to a mass casualty incident. The exercise will
involve helicopters, vessels, safety craft, divers, and rescue
swimmers. This zone is necessary to establish a temporary restricted
area in Wilson Bay to ensure the safety of participants within the
exercise site.

Discussion of Proposed Rule

    The Coast Guard is proposing to establish a temporary safety zone
on the waters of Wilson Bay, Onslow County, North Carolina. During the
exercise the safety zone applies to the navigable waters, from the
surface to the seafloor, defined by enclosing an area south of a
boundary line drawn from New River Channel Daybeacon 61 (34[deg]44'30''
N/077[deg]26'20'' W) to the north tip of Ethridge Point (34[deg]44'37''
N/077[deg]26'06'' W) and extending \1/2\ nautical mile south from the
boundary line. All vessels are prohibited from transiting this section
of the waterway while the safety zone is in effect. Entry into the zone
will not be permitted except as specifically authorized by the Captain
of the Port or a designated representative. To seek permission to
transit the area, mariners can contact Sector North Carolina at
telephone number<PHONE_NUMBER>. This zone will be enforced from 6 a.m.
to 5 p.m. on June 9, 2010.

Regulatory Analyses

    We developed this proposed rule after considering numerous statutes
and executive orders related to rulemaking. Below we summarize our
analysis based on 13 of these statutes or executive orders.

Regulatory Planning and Review

    This proposed rule is not a significant regulatory action under
section 3(f) of Executive Order 12866, Regulatory Planning and Review,
and does not require an assessment of potential costs and benefits
under section 6(a)(3) of that Order. The Office of Management and
Budget has not reviewed it under that Order.
    Although this regulation will restrict access to the area, the
effect of this rule will not be significant because: (i) The safety
zone will only be in effect from 6 a.m. to 5 p.m. on June 9, 2010, (ii)
the Coast Guard will give advance notification via maritime advisories
so mariners can adjust their plans accordingly, and (iii) although the
safety zone will apply to a section of Wilson Bay, it will not restrict
vessel traffic in the federally marked channel.

Small Entities

    Under the Regulatory Flexibility Act (5 U.S.C. 601-612), we have
considered whether this proposed rule would have a significant economic
impact on a substantial number of small entities. The term ``small
entities'' comprises small businesses, not-for-profit organizations
that are independently owned and operated and are not dominant in their
fields, and governmental jurisdictions with populations of less than
50,000.
    The Coast Guard certifies under 5 U.S.C. 605(b) that this proposed
rule would not have a significant economic impact on a substantial
number of small entities.
    This rule will affect the following entities, some of which may be
small entities: the owners or operators of recreational and fishing
vessels intending to transit the specified portion of Wilson Bay from 6
a.m. to 5 p.m. on June 9, 2010.
    This safety zone will not have a significant economic impact on a
substantial number of small entities for the following reasons. This
rule will only be in effect from 6 a.m. to 5 p.m. on June 9, 2010.
Although the safety zone will apply to the section of Wilson Bay, it
will not restrict vessel traffic in the federally marked channel.
Before the effective period, the Coast Guard will issue maritime
advisories widely available to the users of the waterway.
    If you think that your business, organization, or governmental
jurisdiction qualifies as a small entity and that this rule would have
a significant economic impact on it, please submit a comment (see
ADDRESSES) explaining why you think it qualifies and how and to what
degree this rule would economically affect it.

Assistance for Small Entities

    Under section 213(a) of the Small Business Regulatory Enforcement
Fairness Act of 1996 (Pub. L. 104-121), we want to assist small
entities in understanding this proposed rule so that they can better
evaluate its effects on them and participate in the rulemaking. If the
proposed rule would affect your small business, organization, or
governmental jurisdiction and you have questions concerning its
provisions or options for compliance, please contact CWO4 Stephen
Lyons, Waterways Management Division Chief, Sector North Carolina, at
(252) 247-4525. The Coast Guard will not retaliate against small
entities that question or complain about this proposed rule or any
policy or action of the Coast Guard.

Collection of Information

    This proposed rule would call for no new collection of information
under the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 (44 U.S.C. 3501-3520).

Federalism

    A rule has implications for federalism under Executive Order 13132,
Federalism, if it has a substantial direct effect on State or local
governments and would either preempt State law or

impose a substantial direct cost of compliance on them. We have
analyzed this proposed rule under that Order and have determined that
it does not have implications for federalism.

Unfunded Mandates Reform Act

    The Unfunded Mandates Reform Act of 1995 (2 U.S.C. 1531-1538)
requires Federal agencies to assess the effects of their discretionary
regulatory actions. In particular, the Act addresses actions that may
result in the expenditure by a State, local, or tribal government, in
the aggregate, or by the private sector of $100,000,000 (adjusted for
inflation) or more in any one year. Though this proposed rule would not
result in such an expenditure, we do discuss the effects of this rule
elsewhere in this preamble.

Taking of Private Property

    This proposed rule would not cause a taking of private property or
otherwise have taking implications under Executive Order 12630,
Governmental Actions and Interference with Constitutionally Protected
Property Rights.

Civil Justice Reform

    This proposed rule meets applicable standards in sections 3(a) and
3(b)(2) of Executive Order 12988, Civil Justice Reform, to minimize
litigation, eliminate ambiguity, and reduce burden.

Protection of Children

    We have analyzed this proposed rule under Executive Order 13045,
Protection of Children from Environmental Health Risks and Safety
Risks. This rule is not an economically significant rule and would not
create an environmental risk to health or risk to safety that might
disproportionately affect children.

Indian Tribal Governments

    This proposed rule does not have tribal implications under
Executive Order 13175, Consultation and Coordination with Indian Tribal
Governments, because it would not have a substantial direct effect on
one or more Indian tribes, on the relationship between the Federal
Government and Indian tribes, or on the distribution of power and
responsibilities between the Federal Government and Indian tribes.

Energy Effects

    We have analyzed this proposed rule under Executive Order 13211,
Actions Concerning Regulations That Significantly Affect Energy Supply,
Distribution, or Use. We have determined that it is not a ``significant
energy action'' under that order because it is not a ``significant
regulatory action'' under Executive Order 12866 and is not likely to
have a significant adverse effect on the supply, distribution, or use
of energy. The Administrator of the Office of Information and
Regulatory Affairs has not designated it as a significant energy
action. Therefore, it does not require a Statement of Energy Effects
under Executive Order 13211.

Technical Standards

    The National Technology Transfer and Advancement Act (NTTAA) (15
U.S.C. 272 note) directs agencies to use voluntary consensus standards
in their regulatory activities unless the agency provides Congress,
through the Office of Management and Budget, with an explanation of why
using these standards would be inconsistent with applicable law or
otherwise impractical. Voluntary consensus standards are technical
standards (e.g., specifications of materials, performance, design, or
operation; test methods; sampling procedures; and related management
systems practices) that are developed or adopted by voluntary consensus
standards bodies.
    This proposed rule does not use technical standards. Therefore, we
did not consider the use of voluntary consensus standards.

Environment

    We have analyzed this proposed rule under Department of Homeland
Security Management Directive 023-01 and Commandant Instruction
M16475.lD, which guide the Coast Guard in complying with the National
Environmental Policy Act of 1969 (NEPA) (42 U.S.C. 4321-4370f), and
have made a preliminary determination that this action is one of a
category of actions that do not individually or cumulatively have a
significant effect on the human environment. A preliminary
environmental analysis checklist supporting this determination is
available in the docket where indicated under ADDRESSES. This proposed
rule is categorically excluded, under figure 2-1, paragraph (34)(g), of
this instruction. The safety zone is necessary to provide for the
safety of the general public and exercise participants from potential
hazards associated with low flying helicopters and vessels
participating in this multiagency exercise. An environmental analysis
checklist and a categorical exclusion determination are available in
the docket where indicated under ADDRESSES. We seek any comments or
information that may lead to the discovery of a significant
environmental impact from this proposed rule.

List of Subjects in 33 CFR Part 165

    Harbors, Marine safety, Navigation (water), Reporting and
recordkeeping requirements, Security measures, Waterways.

    For the reasons discussed in the preamble, the Coast Guard proposes
to amend 33 CFR Part 165 as follows:

PART 165--REGULATED NAVIGATION AREAS AND LIMITED ACCESS AREAS

    1. The authority citation for part 165 continues to read as
follows:

    Authority: 33 U.S.C. 1226, 1231; 46 U.S.C. Chapter 701, 3306,
3703; 50 U.S.C. 191, 195; 33 CFR 1.05-1, 6.04-1, 6.04-6 and 160.5;
Pub. L. 107-295, 116 Stat. 2064; Department of Homeland Security
Delegation No. 0170.1.

    2. Add Sec.  165.T05-0158 to read as follows:

Sec.  165.T05-0158  Safety Zone; Wilson Bay, Jacksonville, NC.

    (a) Definitions. For the purposes of this section, Captain of the
Port means the Commander, Sector North Carolina. Representative means
any Coast Guard commissioned, warrant, or petty officer who has been
authorized to act on the behalf of the Captain of the Port.
    (b) Location. The following area is a safety zone: The safety zone
is established for the navigable waters, from the surface to the
seafloor, defined by enclosing an area south of a boundary line drawn
from New River Channel Daybeacon 61 (34[deg]44'30'' N/077[deg]26'20''
W) to the north tip of Ethridge Point (34[deg]44'37'' N/077[deg]26'06''
W) and extending \1/2\ nautical mile south from the boundary line into
Wilson Bay, Jacksonville, North Carolina.
    (c) Regulations. (1) The general regulations contained in Sec.
165.23 of this part apply to the area described in paragraph (b) of
this section.
    (2) Persons or vessels requiring entry into or passage through any
portion of the safety zone must first request authorization from the
Captain of the Port, or a designated representative, unless the Captain
of the Port previously announced via Marine Safety Radio Broadcast on
VHF Marine Band Radio channel 22 (157.1 MHz) that this regulation will
not be enforced in that portion of the safety zone. The Captain of the
Port can be contacted at telephone number<PHONE_NUMBER> or by radio on
VHF Marine Band Radio, channels 13 and 16.
    (d) Enforcement. The U.S. Coast Guard may be assisted in the patrol
and enforcement of the zone by Federal, State, and local agencies.

    (e) Enforcement period. This section will be enforced from 6 a.m.
to 5 p.m. on June 9, 2010 unless cancelled earlier by the Captain of
the Port.

    Dated: March 22, 2010.
A. Popiel,
Captain, U.S. Coast Guard, Captain of the Port North Carolina.
[FR Doc. 2010-7427 Filed 4-1-10; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 9110-04-P


[Federal Register Volume 77, Number 72 (Friday, April 13, 2012)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Pages 22232-22233]
[FR Doc No: 2012-9047]

=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY

Coast Guard

46 CFR Parts 2, 24, 30, 70, 90, 91, and 188

[Docket No. USCG-2011-0363]
RIN 1625-AB71

Seagoing Barges

AGENCY: Coast Guard, DHS.

ACTION: Direct final rule; withdrawal of correction.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Coast Guard is withdrawing its correction published on
March 29, 2012, to a direct final rule published on December 14, 2011
and withdrawn on April 6, 2012. The correction was published to correct
an inadvertent transposition in the titles of two tables in our
amendatory instructions and to publish vessel inspection tables in
their entirety so that the format of the tables would be consistent
with current Federal Register format requirements. The direct final
rule was withdrawn on April 6, 2012, because we received two adverse
comments and the direct final rule will not become effective as
scheduled. Therefore, we must also withdraw the vessel inspection
tables published as part of the correction because they are not
consistent with the current regulatory text.

DATES: The correction published March 29, 2012, (77 FR 18929), is
withdrawn on April 11, 2012.

ADDRESSES: The docket for this withdrawn rulemaking is available for
inspection or copying at the Docket Management Facility (M-30), U.S.
Department of Transportation, West Building Ground Floor, Room W12-140,
1200 New Jersey Avenue SE., Washington, DC 20590, between 9 a.m. and 5
p.m., Monday through Friday, except Federal holidays. You may also find
this docket on the Internet by going to http://www.regulations.gov,
inserting

USCG-2011-0363 in the ``Keyword'' box, and then clicking ``Search.''

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: If you have questions about this
notice, call or email Mr. Ken Smith, U.S. Coast Guard, telephone (202)
372-1413, email<EMAIL_ADDRESS>If you have questions on viewing
material in the docket, call Renee V. Wright, Program Manager, Docket
Operations, telephone<PHONE_NUMBER>.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

Background

    On December 14, 2011, we published a direct final rule entitled
``Seagoing Barges'' in the Federal Register (76 FR 77712). That rule
would have redefined ``seagoing barge'' in 46 CFR parts 90 and 91 and
would have revised 46 CFR parts 2, 24, 30, 70, 90, 91, and 188 to
exempt specified seagoing barges from inspection and certification to
align Coast Guard regulations with the language of the applicable
statutes. On March 29, 2012, we published a correction to the direct
final rule in the Federal Register (77 FR 18929) to correct the
inadvertent transposition of the titles of two tables in our amendatory
instructions and to publish the vessel inspection tables in their
entirety so that the format of the tables would be consistent with the
current Federal Register format requirements. On April 6, 2012, (77 FR
20727) we published a notice of withdrawal for the original direct
final rule because we received two adverse comments. Because the direct
final rule will not become effective as scheduled, we must also
withdraw the vessel inspection tables republished as part of the
correction because they are not consistent with the current regulatory
text.

Authority

    We issue this notice of withdrawal under the authority of 33 U.S.C.
494, 502, 525, 33 CFR 1.05-55, and Department of Homeland Security
Delegation No. 0170.1.
    Because the inspection tables republished as part of the correction
are not consistent with the current regulatory text, we are withdrawing
the correction.

    Dated: April 11, 2012.
Kathryn A. Sinniger,
Chief, Office of Regulations and Administrative Law, U.S. Coast Guard.
[FR Doc. 2012-9047 Filed 4-11-12; 4:15 pm]
BILLING CODE 9110-04-P


[Federal Register Volume 88, Number 81 (Thursday, April 27, 2023)]
[Notices]
[Pages 25631-25632]
[FR Doc No: 2023-08920]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission

[Project No. 2445-028]

Green Mountain Power Corporation; Notice of Waiver Period for

    Water Quality Certification Application
    On April 12, 2023, Green Mountain Power Corporation submitted to
the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission (Commission) a copy of its
application for a Clean Water Act section 401(a)(1) water quality
certification filed with the Vermont Department of Environmental
Conservation (Vermont DEC), in conjunction with the above captioned
project. Pursuant to 40 CFR 121.6 and section 4.34(b)(5) of the
Commission's regulations,\1\ we hereby notify the Vermont DEC of the
following:
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \1\ 18 CFR 4.34(b)(5).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    Date of Receipt of the Certification Request: April 12, 2023.
    Reasonable Period of Time To Act on the Certification Request: One
year, April 12, 2024.
    If Vermont DEC fails or refuses to act on the water quality
certification request on or before the above date, then the agency
certifying authority is deemed waived pursuant to section 401(a)(1) of

the Clean Water Act, 33 U.S.C. 1341(a)(1).

    Dated: April 21, 2023.
Debbie-Anne A. Reese,
Deputy Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2023-08920 Filed 4-26-23; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6717-01-P


[Federal Register Volume 87, Number 82 (Thursday, April 28, 2022)]
[Notices]
[Pages 25236-25237]
[FR Doc No: 2022-09119]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission

[Docket No. CP21-470-000]

Freeport LNG Development, L.P., FLNG Liquefaction, LLC, FLNG
Liquefaction 2, LLC, FLNG Liquefaction 3, LLC; Notice of Revised
Schedule for Environmental Review of the Freeport LNG Capacity
Amendment Project

    This notice identifies the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission
staff's revised schedule for the completion of the environmental
assessment (EA) for the Freeport LNG Capacity Amendment Project. The
first notice of schedule, issued on December 14, 2021, identified April
22, 2022 as the EA issuance date. However, environmental staff is in
the process of assessing Freeport LNG Development, L.P.'s recent
supplemental filings regarding air quality emissions due to the
capacity modifications. As a result, staff has revised the schedule for
issuance of the EA.

Schedule for Environmental Review

Issuance of the Notice of Availability of the EA--May 12, 2022
90-day Federal Authorization Decision Deadline--August 10, 2022

    If another schedule change becomes necessary, an additional notice
will be provided so that the relevant agencies are kept informed of the
project's progress.

Additional Information

    In order to receive notification of the issuance of the EA and to
keep track of all formal issuances and submittals in specific dockets,
the Commission offers a free service called eSubscription. This can
reduce the amount of time you spend researching proceedings by
automatically providing you with notification of these filings,
document summaries, and direct links to the documents. Go to https://www.ferc.gov/ferc-online/overview to register for eSubscription.
    Additional information about the Project is available from the
Commission's Office of External Affairs at (866) 208-FERC or on the
FERC website (www.ferc.gov). Using the ``eLibrary'' link, select
``General Search'' from the eLibrary menu, enter the

selected date range and ``Docket Number'' (i.e., CP21-470), and follow
the instructions. For assistance with access to eLibrary, the helpline
can be reached at<PHONE_NUMBER>, TTY<PHONE_NUMBER>, or at
[email protected]. The eLibrary link on the FERC website also
provides access to the texts of formal documents issued by the
Commission, such as orders, notices, and rule makings.

    Dated: April 22, 2022.
Debbie-Anne A. Reese,
Deputy Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2022-09119 Filed 4-27-22; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6717-01-P


[Federal Register Volume 77, Number 95 (Wednesday, May 16, 2012)]
[Notices]
[Page 28869]
[FR Doc No: 2012-11826]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission

Notice of Commission Staff Attendance

    The Federal Energy Regulatory Commission hereby gives notice that
members of the Commission's staff may attend the following meeting
related to the transmission planning activities of the Southern Company
Services, Inc.:

2012 Southeastern Regional Transmission Planning Process (SERTP)
Interim Meeting on Order No. 1000

    May 17, 2012, 9:00 a.m.-12:00 p.m., Local Time.
    The above-referenced meeting will be a Telephone/Web Conferencing
meeting.
    The above-referenced meeting is open to stakeholders.
    Further information may be found at: www.southeasternrtp.com.
    The discussions at the meeting described above may address matters
at issue in the following proceeding: Docket No. ER12-337, Mississippi
Power Company.
    For more information, contact Valerie Martin, Office of Energy
Market Regulation, Federal Energy Regulatory Commission at (202) 502-
6139 or<EMAIL_ADDRESS>
    Dated: May 10, 2012.
Kimberly D. Bose,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2012-11826 Filed 5-15-12; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6717-01-P


[Federal Register: April 6, 2010 (Volume 75, Number 65)]
[Notices]
[Page 17460-17462]
[DOCID:fr06ap10-95]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

[Release No. 34-61806; File No. SR-FINRA-2010-013]

Self-Regulatory Organizations; Financial Industry Regulatory
Authority, Inc.; Notice of Filing and Immediate Effectiveness of
Proposed Rule Change To Modify FINRA/Nasdaq Trade Reporting Securities
Transaction Credit

March 31, 2010.
    Pursuant to Section 19(b)(1) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934
(``Act'') \1\ and Rule 19b-4 thereunder,\2\ notice is hereby given that
on March 26, 2010, Financial Industry Regulatory Authority, Inc.
(``FINRA'') filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (``SEC''
or ``Commission'') the proposed rule change as described in Items I, II
and III below, which Items have been prepared by FINRA. FINRA has
designated the proposed rule change as ``establishing or changing a
due, fee or other charge'' under Section 19(b)(3)(A)(ii) of the Act \3\
and Rule 19b-4(f)(2) thereunder,\4\ which renders the proposal
effective upon receipt of this filing by the Commission. The Commission
is publishing this notice to solicit comments on the proposed rule
change from interested persons.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \1\ 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(1).
    \2\ 17 CFR 240.19b-4.
    \3\ 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(3)(A)(ii).
    \4\ 17 CFR 240.19b-4(f)(2).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

I. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement of the Terms of Substance
of the Proposed Rule Change

    FINRA is proposing to amend FINRA Rule 7610A (Securities
Transaction Credit) to modify credits provided to members that use the
FINRA/Nasdaq Trade Reporting Facility (``FINRA/Nasdaq TRF'').
    The text of the proposed rule change is available on FINRA's Web
site at http://www.finra.org, at the principal office of FINRA and at
the Commission's Public Reference Room.

II. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement of the Purpose of, and
Statutory Basis for, the Proposed Rule Change

    In its filing with the Commission, FINRA included statements
concerning the purpose of and basis for the proposed rule change and
discussed any comments it received on the proposed rule change. The
text of these statements may be examined at the places specified in
Item IV below. FINRA has prepared summaries, set forth in sections A,
B, and C below, of the most significant aspects of such statements.

A. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement of the Purpose of, and
Statutory Basis for, the Proposed Rule Change

1. Purpose
Background
    The FINRA/Nasdaq TRF is a facility of FINRA that is operated by The
NASDAQ OMX Group, Inc. (``NASDAQ OMX''). In connection with the
establishment of the FINRA/Nasdaq TRF, FINRA and NASDAQ OMX entered
into a limited liability company agreement (the ``LLC Agreement'').
Under the LLC Agreement, FINRA, the ``SRO Member,'' has sole regulatory
responsibility for the FINRA/Nasdaq TRF. NASDAQ OMX, the ``Business
Member,'' is primarily responsible for the management of the FINRA/
Nasdaq TRF's business affairs, including establishing pricing for use
of the FINRA/Nasdaq TRF, to the extent those affairs are not
inconsistent with the regulatory and oversight functions of FINRA.
Additionally, the Business Member is obligated to pay the cost of
regulation and is entitled to the profits and losses, if any, derived
from the operation of the FINRA/Nasdaq TRF.
    The FINRA/Nasdaq TRF receives revenue for transactions reported to
the three tapes \5\ from the Consolidated Tape Association and Nasdaq
Securities Information Processor (the ``Tapes''). Pursuant to Rule
7610A, FINRA members are provided with a fractional share of this
revenue based on their ``Market Share.'' \6\ Market Share is calculated
quarterly for each member based on the transactions attributed to them
in each of the three Tapes. Rule 7610A provides four tiers of revenue
share: 0%, 50%, 80% and 100%. Eligibility for a tier is based on the
percentage of Market Share, and the percentage of Market Share required
increases as the tiers of revenue share increase. Currently, the amount
of Market Share required to receive an allocation under each tier is
different for each Tape. For example, to receive an 80% share of
revenue, a member must have 0.15% but less than 0.25% of Market Share
if reporting an NYSE security, 0.25% but less than 0.50% if reporting
an Amex security, or 0.25% but less than 0.75% if reporting a Nasdaq
security.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \5\ Market data is transmitted to three tapes based on the
listing venue of the security: New York Stock Exchange securities
(``Tape A''), American Stock Exchange and regional exchange
securities (``Tape B''), and Nasdaq Stock Market securities (``Tape
C''). Tape A and Tape B are generally referred to as the
Consolidated Tape.
    \6\ Rule 7610A defines Market Share as a percentage calculated
by dividing the total number of shares represented by trades
reported by a FINRA member to the FINRA/Nasdaq TRF during a given
calendar quarter by the total number of shares represented by all
trades reported to the Consolidated Tape Association or the Nasdaq
Securities Information Processor, as applicable, during that
quarter. Market Share is calculated separately for each tape.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

Proposed Amendments to Credit Schedule
    NASDAQ OMX, as the FINRA/Nasdaq TRF Business Member, has determined
to amend the Market Share percentages for revenue sharing eligibility
applicable to Tapes A and B so that they are consistent with the
current levels of Tape C. Accordingly, FINRA is proposing to amend Rule
7610A to reflect the new credit schedule. The following table provides
a comparison of the old Market Share tier structure with the proposed
new structure:

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
                                                                                Revenue share
                                                      Previous tier break point                         New tier break point                 (percent)
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Tape A Tier 1............................  =>0.25%.......................................  =>0.75%......................................             100
Tape A Tier 2............................  <0.25%, =>0.15%...............................  <0.75%, =>0.25%..............................              80
Tape A Tier 3............................  <0.15%, =>0.10%...............................  <0.25%, =>10%................................              50
Tape A Tier 4............................  <0.10%........................................  <0.10%.......................................               0
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Tape B Tier 1............................  =>0.50%.......................................  =>0.75%......................................             100
Tape B Tier 2............................  <0.50%, =>0.25%...............................  <0.75%, =>0.25%..............................              80
Tape B Tier 3............................  <0.25%, =>0.10%...............................  <0.25%, =>0.10%..............................              50
Tape B Tier 4............................  <0.10%........................................  <0.10%.......................................               0
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Tape C Tier 1............................  =>0.75%.......................................  =>0.75%......................................             100
Tape C Tier 2............................  <0.75%, =>0.25%...............................  <0.75%, =>0.25%..............................              80
Tape C Tier 3............................  <0.25%, =>0.10%...............................  <0.25%, =>0.10%..............................              50
Tape C Tier 4............................  <0.10%........................................  <0.10%.......................................               0
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

    The Business Member notes that the volume and distribution of
Market Share among both Tapes A and B have matured so that they more
closely resemble the Market Share distribution of Tape C. As such, the
Business Member believes that it is appropriate to align the tier
structure of Tapes A and B to that of Tape C.
    The Business Member has advised FINRA that it believes that the
proposed amended credit schedule more equitably allocates the revenue
share provided to members for their use of the FINRA/Nasdaq TRF. The
proposed rule change will eliminate the differences in allocation, thus
rewarding each member consistently for its use of the FINRA/Nasdaq TRF,
irrespective of the Tape to which the transaction is reported.
    Under the proposed credit schedule, the thresholds for receiving
revenue share under the tiers of Tapes A and B have increased. As a
consequence, members that have historically qualified to receive
revenue share from Tapes A and B may no longer qualify for the same
tier, notwithstanding that they have achieved the same level of Market
Share. The Business Member believes that this is an appropriate result
of aligning Market Share with the revenues received from the Tapes for
reporting those transactions.
    FINRA has filed the proposed rule change for immediate
effectiveness.

FINRA is proposing that the operative date of the proposed rule change
will be April 1, 2010.
2. Statutory Basis
    FINRA believes that the proposed rule change is consistent with the
provisions of Section 15A(b)(5) of the Act,\7\ which requires, among
other things, that FINRA rules provide for the equitable allocation of
reasonable dues, fees and other charges among members and issuers and
other persons using any facility or system that FINRA operates or
controls. FINRA believes that the amended credit schedule is fair and
provides an equitable allocation of the credits provided to the FINRA/
Nasdaq TRF in that it will apply uniformly to all FINRA members that
use the FINRA/Nasdaq TRF.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \7\ 15 U.S.C. 78o-3(b)(5).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

B. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement on Burden on Competition

    FINRA does not believe that the proposed rule change will result in
any burden on competition that is not necessary or appropriate in
furtherance of the purposes of the Act.

C. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement on Comments on the Proposed
Rule Change Received From Members, Participants, or Others

    No written comments were either solicited or received.

III. Date of Effectiveness of the Proposed Rule Change and Timing for
Commission Action

    The foregoing rule change has become effective pursuant to Section
19(b)(3)(A)(ii) of the Act \8\ and paragraph (f)(2) of Rule 19b-4
thereunder.\9\ At any time within 60 days of the filing of the proposed
rule change, the Commission may summarily abrogate such rule change if
it appears to the Commission that such action is necessary or
appropriate in the public interest, for the protection of investors, or
otherwise in furtherance of the purposes of the Act.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \8\ 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(3)(A)(ii).
    \9\ 17 CFR 240.19b-4(f)(2).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

IV. Solicitation of Comments

    Interested persons are invited to submit written data, views, and
arguments concerning the foregoing, including whether the proposed rule
change is consistent with the Act. Comments may be submitted by any of
the following methods:

Electronic Comments

     Use the Commission's Internet comment form (http://
www.sec.gov/rules/sro.shtml); or
     Send an e-mail to<EMAIL_ADDRESS>Please include
File Number SR-FINRA-2010-013 on the subject line.

Paper Comments

     Send paper comments in triplicate to Elizabeth M. Murphy,
Secretary, Securities and Exchange Commission, 100 F Street, NE.,
Washington, DC 20549-1090.

All submissions should refer to File Number SR-FINRA-2010-013. This
file number should be included on the subject line if e-mail is used.
To help the Commission process and review your comments more
efficiently, please use only one method. The Commission will post all
comments on the Commission's Internet Web site (http://www.sec.gov/
rules/sro.shtml). Copies of the submission, all subsequent amendments,
all written statements with respect to the proposed rule change that
are filed with the Commission, and all written communications relating
to the proposed rule change between the Commission and any person,
other than those that may be withheld from the public in accordance
with the provisions of 5 U.S.C. 552, will be available for Web site
viewing and printing in the Commission's Public Reference Room, 100 F
Street, NE., Washington, DC 20549, on official business days between
the hours of 10 a.m. and 3 p.m. Copies of such filing also will be
available for inspection and copying at the principal office of FINRA.
All comments received will be posted without change; the Commission
does not edit personal identifying information from submissions. You
should submit only information that you wish to make publicly
available. All submissions should refer to File Number SR-FINRA-2010-
013 and should be submitted on or before April 27, 2010.

    For the Commission, by the Division of Trading and Markets,
pursuant to delegated authority.\10\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \10\ 17 CFR 200.30-3(a)(12).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

Florence E. Harmon,
Deputy Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2010-7694 Filed 4-5-10; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 8011-01-P


ÿWPCL
ûÿ2BJ#|xÐ°°ÐÐÐÐÐØ	pÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿ°ÐÐÃÃFrom: ÄÄÁØ	Ø<EMAIL_ADDRESS>ÃÃTo:ÄÄÁØ	Ø<EMAIL_ADDRESS>ÃÃDate: ÄÄÁØ	Ø	Á6/9/2005 3:11:32 PM
ÃÃSubject: ÄÄÁØ	Ø	ÁClarification on TRI reporting

ÐÐ°`	¸hÀpÈ 	x
Ð (#€%Ø'0*ˆ,à.813è5@8˜:ð<H? AøCPF¨HKXM°OR`T¸VYh[À]`°ÐÐMs. Bell,

Recently you received a telpehone call from TJ Finsenth.  He is employed
by ERG and is supporting our effluent guidelines review.  As requested,
I am attaching a letter that provides additional information about our
effluent guidelines review and our questions concerning your TRI
reporting of certain chemicals.

Please feel free to contact me if you have any questions or comments.

Jan Matuszko
(202) 566-1035

(See attached file: Chevron Pascagoula Letter.wpd)
ÐÐØ	ÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿ°ÐÐ
ÃÃCC:ÄÄÁØ	Ø<EMAIL_ADDRESS><EMAIL_ADDRESS><EMAIL_ADDRESS><EMAIL_ADDRESS><EMAIL_ADDRESS>


[Federal Register Volume 80, Number 74 (Friday, April 17, 2015)]
[Notices]
[Pages 21239-21240]
[FR Doc No: 2015-08910]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY

[FRL-9926-25-Region 5]

Notice of Issuance of a Federal Operating Permit for G&K Services
Inc.--Green Bay

AGENCY: Environmental Protection Agency (EPA).

ACTION: Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: This notice announces that on March 23, 2015, pursuant to
title V of the Clean Air Act, the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA)
issued a Federal operating permit to G&K Services, Inc., for G&K
Services, Inc.--Green Bay. The permit authorizes the operation of
industrial washers, industrial dryers, a natural gas-fired boiler, a
steam tunnel, and other processes used to clean and recondition soiled
industrial towels.

ADDRESSES: The final signed permit is available for public inspection
online at http://yosemite.epa.gov/r5/r5ard.nsf/Tribal+Permits!OpenView,
or during normal business hours at the following address: U.S.
Environmental Protection Agency, Region 5, Air and Radiation Division,
77 West Jackson Boulevard, Chicago, Illinois 60604. We recommend that
you call Michael Langman, Environmental Scientist, at<PHONE_NUMBER>
before visiting the Region 5 office.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Michael Langman, Environmental
Scientist, Air Permits Section, Air Programs Branch (AR-18J),
Environmental Protection Agency, Region 5, 77 West Jackson Boulevard,
Chicago, Illinois 60604,<PHONE_NUMBER><EMAIL_ADDRESS>
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Throughout this document whenever ``we,''
``us,'' or ``our'' is used, we mean EPA.

A. What is the background information?

    G&K Services, Inc. owns and operates G&K Services, Inc.--Green Bay,
which is located within the exterior boundaries of the Oneida Tribe of
Indians of Wisconsin's tribal reservation in Green Bay, Wisconsin.
Emission units at the source consist of nine industrial washers, six
natural gas-fired industrial dryers, a natural gas-fired boiler, a
natural gas-fired steam tunnel, and other processes. These emission
units and other processes are used to process, clean, and recondition
soiled industrial towels.
    On February 13, 2013, G&K Services, Inc. contacted EPA Region 5 to
discuss the permitting status of G&K Services, Inc.--Green Bay, since a
question had arisen regarding the identity of the proper permitting
authority. Prior to the issuance of this permit, G&K Services, Inc.--
Green Bay operated according to the requirements of an operating permit
issued by the Wisconsin Department of Natural Resources (WDNR).
However, on December 4, 2001, EPA granted full approval of Wisconsin's
title V operating permit program (see 66 FR 62951). In its action, EPA
specifically exempted Indian country from the approval of Wisconsin's
title V operating permit program (id. at 62953). Since the source is
located within the exterior boundaries of the Oneida Tribe of Indians
of Wisconsin's tribal reservation and EPA did not grant WDNR the
authority to issue title V operating permits to sources located in
Indian country, EPA determined that we are the permitting authority for
this source.
    On June 14, 2013, G&K Services, Inc. submitted an application for
an initial operating permit pursuant to the requirements of the Federal
operating permit program codified at 40 CFR part 71. On July 17, 2013,
G&K Services, Inc. submitted additional information to supplement its
permit application. On July 25, 2013, EPA determined that the
application was complete pursuant to 40 CFR 71.5(a)(2).
    On December 5, 2014, EPA issued a draft permit for a 30-day public
comment period pursuant to 40 CFR 71.11(d). The public comment period
ended on January 5, 2015. During the public comment period, EPA
received comments from G&K Services, Inc. requesting clarification of
permit terms. EPA responded to all comments as required by 40 CFR
71.11(j).

    EPA issued the final permit for G&K Services, Inc.--Green Bay,
permit number V-ON-5500900021-2014-01, on March 23, 2015. Pursuant to
40 CFR 71.11(i)(2), the final permit becomes effective on April 22,
2015, unless review is requested pursuant to 40 CFR 71.11(i)(1).

B. Appeal of the Permit

    Pursuant to 40 CFR 71.11(l), any person who filed comments on the
draft permit may petition the Environmental Appeals Board for
administrative review of any condition of the permit decision. Any
person who failed to file comments may petition for administrative
review of the permit only on changes from the draft to the final permit
or to the extent that new grounds for a petition have arisen that were
not reasonably foreseeable during the public comment period on the
draft permit. The 30-day period during which a person may seek review
under 40 CFR 71.11(l) began on March 25, 2015, the date on which EPA
notified G&K Services, Inc. of issuance of the permit.

C. What is the purpose of this notice?

    EPA is notifying the public of the issuance of a title V operating
permit, permit number V-ON-5500900021-2014-01, issued on March 23,
2015, to G&K Services, Inc. for its source in Green Bay, Wisconsin. The
permit becomes effective on April 22, 2015, unless review is requested
pursuant to 40 CFR 71.11(i)(1).

    Authority:  42 U.S.C. 7401 et seq.

    Dated: April 1, 2015.
Susan Hedman,
Regional Administrator, Region 5.
[FR Doc. 2015-08910 Filed 4-16-15; 8:45 am]
 BILLING CODE 6560-50-P