[Federal Register Volume 75, Number 240 (Wednesday, December 15, 2010)]
[Notices]
[Pages 78330-78331]
[FR Doc No: 2010-31446]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

[Release No. 34-63484; File No. SR-NSX-2010-16]

Self-Regulatory Organizations; National Stock Exchange, Inc.;
Notice of Filing and Immediate Effectiveness of Proposed Rule Change To
Amend Its Rules To Extend Pilot Program Regarding Clearly Erroneous
Executions

December 9, 2010.
    Pursuant to Section 19(b)(1) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934
(the ``Act'') \1\ and Rule 19b-4 thereunder,\2\ notice is hereby given
that on December 8, 2010, National Stock Exchange, Inc. filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission (``Commission'') the proposed rule
change, as described in Items I and II below, which Items have been
prepared by the Exchange. The Commission is publishing this notice to
solicit comment on the proposed rule change from interested persons.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \1\ 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(1).
    \2\ 17 CFR 240.19b-4.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

I. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement of the Terms of Substance
of the Proposed Rule Change

    National Stock Exchange, Inc. (``NSX[supreg]'' or ``Exchange'') is
proposing to amend its rules to extend until April 11, 2011, a certain
pilot program regarding clearly erroneous executions.
    The text of the proposed rule change is available on the Exchange's
Web site at http://www.nsx.com, at the principal office of the
Exchange, and at the Commission's Public Reference Room.

II. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement of the Purpose of, and
Statutory Basis for, the Proposed Rule Change

    In its filing with the Commission, the Exchange included statements
concerning the purpose of and basis for the proposed rule change and
discussed any comments it received on the proposed rule change. The
text of these statements may be examined at the places specified in
Item IV below. The Exchange has prepared summaries, set forth in
sections A, B, and C below, of the most significant parts of such
statements.

A. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement of the Purpose of, and
Statutory Basis for, the Proposed Rule Change

1. Purpose
    With this rule change, the Exchange is proposing to extend the
pilot program currently in effect regarding clearly erroneous
executions under NSX Rule 11.19. Currently, unless otherwise extended
or approved permanently, this pilot program will expire on December 10,
2010. The instant rule filing proposes to extend the pilot program
until April 11, 2011.
    NSX Rule 11.19 (Clearly Erroneous Executions) was approved by the
Securities and Exchange Commission (the ``Commission'') on September
10, 2010 on a pilot basis to end on December 10, 2010.\3\ Similar rule
changes were adopted by other markets in the national market system in
a coordinated manner. During the pilot period, the Exchange, in
conjunction with the Commission and other markets, has continued to
assess the effectiveness of the pilot program. The Exchange, in
consultation with other markets and the Commission, has determined that
the duration of this pilot program should be extended. Accordingly,
pursuant to the instant rule filing, the expiration date of the pilot
program referenced in the first two sentences of Rule 11.19 is proposed
to be changed from ``December 10, 2010'' to ``April 11, 2011''.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \3\ See Securities Exchange Act Release No. 62886 (September 10,
2010), 75 FR 56613 (September 16, 2010) (SR-NSX-2010-07).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

2. Statutory Basis
    The Exchange believes that the proposed rule change is consistent
with the provisions of Section 6(b) of the Act,\4\ in general, and
Section 6(b)(5) of the Act,\5\ in particular, in that it is designed,
among other things, to promote clarity, transparency and full
disclosure, in so doing, to prevent fraudulent and manipulative acts
and practices, to promote just and equitable principles of trade, to
remove impediments to and perfect the mechanism of a free and open
market and a national market system, and, in general, to protect
investors and the public interest. Moreover, the proposed rule change
is not discriminatory in that it uniformly applies to all ETP Holders.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \4\ 15 U.S.C. 78f(b).
    \5\ 15 U.S.C. 78f(b)(5).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

B. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement on Burden on Competition

    The Exchange does not believe that the proposed rule change will
impose any inappropriate burden on competition.

C. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement on Comments on the Proposed
Rule Change Received From Members, Participants or Others

    The Exchange has neither solicited nor received written comments on
the proposed rule change.

III. Date of Effectiveness of the Proposed Rule Change and Timing for
Commission Action

    Because the foregoing proposed rule change does not: (i)
Significantly affect the protection of investors or the public
interest; (ii) impose any significant burden on competition; and (iii)
become operative for 30 days from the date on which it was filed, or
such shorter time as the Commission may designate, it has become
effective pursuant to Section 19(b)(3)(A) of the Act \6\ and Rule 19b-
4(f)(6)(iii) thereunder.\7\ The Exchange has asked the Commission to
waive the 30-day operative delay so that the proposal may become
operative immediately upon filing. The Commission believes that waiving
the 30-day operative delay is consistent with the protection of
investors and the public interest because such waiver will allow the
pilot program to continue uninterrupted and help ensure uniformity
among the national securities exchanges and FINRA with respect to the
treatment of clearly erroneous transactions.\8\ Accordingly, the
Commission waives the 30-day operative delay requirement and designates
the proposed rule change as operative upon filing with the Commission.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \6\ 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(3)(A).
    \7\ 17 CFR 240.19b-4(f)(6)(iii). In addition, Rule 19b-
4(f)(6)(iii) requires that a self-regulatory organization submit to
the Commission written notice of its intent to file the proposed
rule change, along with a brief description and text of the proposed
rule change, at least five business days prior to the filing of the
proposed rule change, or such shorter time as designated by the
Commission. The Commission notes that the Exchange has satisfied
this requirement.
    \8\ For purposes only of waiving the 30-day operative delay the
Commission has considered the proposed rule's impact on efficiency,
competition, and capital formation. See 15 U.S.C. 78c(f).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    At any time within 60 days of the filing of the proposed rule
change, the Commission summarily may temporarily suspend such rule
change if

it appears to the Commission that such action is necessary or
appropriate in the public interest, for the protection of investors, or
otherwise in furtherance of the purposes of the Act.

IV. Solicitation of Comments

    Interested persons are invited to submit written data, views, and
arguments concerning the foregoing, including whether the proposed rule
change is consistent with the Act. Comments may be submitted by any of
the following methods:

Electronic Comments

     Use the Commission's Internet comment form http://www.sec.gov/rules/sro.shtml; or
     Send an e-mail to<EMAIL_ADDRESS>Please include
File Number SR-NSX-2010-16 on the subject line.

Paper Comments

     Send paper comments in triplicate to Elizabeth M. Murphy,
Secretary, Securities and Exchange Commission, 100 F Street, NE.,
Washington, DC 20549-1090.
    All submissions should refer to File Number SR-NSX-2010-16. This
file number should be included on the subject line if e-mail is used.
To help the Commission process and review your comments more
efficiently, please use only one method. The Commission will post all
comments on the Commission's Internet Web site http://www.sec.gov/rules/sro.shtml. Copies of the submission, all subsequent amendments,
all written statements with respect to the proposed rule change that
are filed with the Commission, and all written communications relating
to the proposed rule change between the Commission and any person,
other than those that may be withheld from the public in accordance
with the provisions of 5 U.S.C. 552, will be available for Web site
viewing and printing in the Commission's Public Reference Room, 100 F
Street, NE., Washington, DC 20549, on official business days between
the hours of 10 a.m. and 3 p.m. Copies of such filing also will be
available for inspection and copying at the principal office of the
Exchange. All comments received will be posted without change; the
Commission does not edit personal identifying information from
submissions. You should submit only information that you wish to make
publicly available. All submissions should refer to File Number SR-NSX-
2010-16 and should be submitted on or before January 5, 2011.

    For the Commission, by the Division of Trading and Markets,
pursuant to delegated authority.\9\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \9\ 17 CFR 200.30-3(a)(12).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

Florence E. Harmon,
Deputy Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2010-31446 Filed 12-14-10; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 8011-01-P


1 Date: August 23, 2003 Subject: Telephone Conference Summary  EPA and representatives from Cleveland Cliffs and Tilden Mining From: Chris Sarsony, Alpha Gamma Technologies, Inc To: Docket OAR 2002   0039 I. Purpose The primary purpose of these meetings was to discuss why continuous opacity monitors may not work on taconite indurating furnace stacks.

II. Date May 07 and 08, 2003 III. Attendees U. S. Environmental Protection Agency Conrad Chin, OAQPS/ ESD/ MG Industry Representatives John Meier, Cleveland Cliffs Leonard Parker, Tilden Mining Alpha Gamma Technologies Chris Sarsony IV. Discussion Tilden contacted Land Instruments regarding their Premier COMS model. This model will not work on indurating furnace stacks due to the high moisture content of the stack exhaust ( 10%) and the variability of the moisture content of the stack exhaust. Also, the premier model will not work properly when the temperature fluctuates significantly, as is the case in their indurating furnace stacks.

Tilden indicated that they are currently planning to install a COMS on one of their indurating furnace stacks on a trial basis. They stated that they will not know how well it OAR 2002 0039 IV E 16 2 works until they try it. They have received conflicting information on how the high moisture content of the stack exhaust will affect the performance of COMS.

With regard to COMS they are concerned about the following three things: ° plugging of the COMS, ° being able to reproduce the COMS results, and ° how accurately the COMS readings represent emissions of PM.

Once the COMS is installed they will share their data with the EPA.


[Federal Register Volume 80, Number 24 (Thursday, February 5, 2015)]
[Notices]
[Page 6567]
[FR Doc No: 2015-02323]

=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION

Federal Aviation Administration

Notice of Intent To Rule on Request To Release Airport Property
at the South Texas Regional Airport at Hondo, Texas

AGENCY: Federal Aviation Administration (FAA), DOT.

ACTION: Notice of request to release airport property.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The FAA proposes to rule and invite public comment on the
release of land at the South Texas Regional Airport at Hondo under the
provisions of Section 125 of the Wendell H. Ford Aviation Investment
Reform Act for the 21st Century (AIR 21).

DATES: Comments must be received on or before March 9, 2015.

ADDRESSES: Comments on this application may be mailed or delivered to
the FAA at the following address: Mr. Ed Agnew, Manager, Federal
Aviation Administration, Southwest Region, Airports Division, Texas
Airports Development Office, ASW-650, Fort Worth, Texas 76137.
    In addition, one copy of any comments submitted to the FAA must be
mailed or delivered to Mr. Jeff Litchfield, City Manager, at the
following address: 1600 Avenue M, Hondo, Texas 78861.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Mr. Anthony Mekhail, Program Manager,
Federal Aviation Administration, Texas Airports Development Office,
ASW-650, 2601 Meacham Boulevard, Fort Worth, Texas 76137, Telephone:
(817) 222-5663, email<EMAIL_ADDRESS>fax:<PHONE_NUMBER>.
    The request to release property may be reviewed in person at this
same location.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The FAA invites public comment on the
request to release property at the South Texas Regional Airport at
Hondo under the provisions of the AIR 21.
    The following is a brief overview of the request:
    The City of Hondo requests the release of 5.884 acres of
aeronautical airport property. The property is located southwest of
Runway 31 and just north of the railroad tracks. The property to be
released will be sold and revenues shall be used for the operation and
maintenance at the airport.
    Any person may inspect the request in person at the FAA office
listed above under FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT.
    In addition, any person may, upon request, inspect the application,
notice and other documents relevant to the application in person at the
South Texas Regional Airport at Hondo, telephone number<PHONE_NUMBER>.

    Issued in Fort Worth, Texas, on January 29, 2015.
Lacey Spriggs,
Acting Manager, Airports Division.
[FR Doc. 2015-02323 Filed 2-4-15; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910-13-P


[Federal Register Volume 80, Number 95 (Monday, May 18, 2015)]
[Notices]
[Pages 28277-28278]
[FR Doc No: 2015-11819]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES

Food and Drug Administration

[Docket No. FDA-2015-D-1580]

Patient Preference Information--Submission, Review in Premarket
Approval Applications, Humanitarian Device Exemption Applications, and
De Novo Requests, and Inclusion in Device Labeling; Draft Guidance for
Industry, Food and Drug Administration Staff, and Other Stakeholders;
Availability

AGENCY: Food and Drug Administration, HHS.

ACTION: Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Food and Drug Administration (FDA or Agency) is announcing
the availability of a draft guidance for industry entitled ``Patient
Preference Information--Submission, Review in PMAs, HDE Applications,
and De Novo Requests, and Inclusion in Device Labeling.'' This document
provides guidance on collecting and submitting patient preference
information that may be used by FDA staff in decisionmaking relating to
premarket approval applications (PMAs), Humanitarian Device Exemption
(HDE) applications, and de novo requests. This draft guidance also
outlines considerations for including patient preference information in
labeling for patients and health care professionals. This draft
guidance is not final nor is it in effect at this time.

DATES: Although you can comment on any guidance at any time (see 21 CFR
10.115(g)(5)), to ensure that the Agency considers your comment on this
draft guidance before it begins work on the final version of the
guidance, submit either electronic or written comments on the draft
guidance by August 17, 2015.

ADDRESSES: An electronic copy of the guidance document is available for
download from the Internet. See the SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION section
for information on electronic access to the guidance. Submit written
requests for a single hard copy of the draft guidance document entitled
``Patient Preference Information--Submission, Review in PMAs, HDE
Applications, and De Novo Requests, and Inclusion in Device Labeling''
to the Office of the Center Director, Guidance and Policy Development,
Center for Devices and Radiological Health, Food and Drug
Administration, 10903 New Hampshire Ave., Bldg. 66, Rm. 5431, Silver
Spring, MD 20993-0002 or the Office of Communication, Outreach, and
Development, Center for Biologics Evaluation and Research, Food and
Drug Administration, 10903 New Hampshire Ave., Bldg. 71, Rm. 3128,
Silver Spring, MD 20993-0002. Send one self-addressed adhesive label to
assist that office in processing your request.
    Submit electronic comments on the draft guidance to http://www.regulations.gov. Submit written comments to the Division of Dockets
Management (HFA-305), Food and Drug Administration, 5630 Fishers Lane,
Rm. 1061, Rockville, MD 20852. Identify comments with the docket number
found in brackets in the heading of this document.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Anindita Saha, Center for Devices and
Radiological Health, Food and Drug Administration, 10903 New Hampshire
Ave., Bldg. 66, Rm. 5414, Silver Spring, MD 20993-0002,<PHONE_NUMBER>,
<EMAIL_ADDRESS>or Stephen Ripley, Center for Biologics
Evaluation and Research, Food and Drug Administration, 10903 New
Hampshire Ave., Bldg. 71, Rm. 7301, Silver Spring, MD 20993, 240-402-
7911.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

I. Background

    FDA is announcing the availability of a draft guidance for industry
entitled ``Patient Preference Information--Submission, Review in PMAs,
HDE Applications, and De Novo Requests, and Inclusion in Device
Labeling.'' FDA believes that patients can and should bring their own
experiences to bear in helping the Agency to evaluate the risk-benefit
profile of certain devices. This document provides guidance on
collecting and submitting patient preference information that may be
used by FDA staff in decision-making relating to PMAs, HDE
applications, and de novo requests. The objectives of this draft
guidance are: (1) To encourage voluntary submission of patient
preference information by sponsors or other stakeholders in certain
circumstances; (2) to outline recommended qualities of patient
preference studies, which may result in valid scientific evidence; (3)
to provide recommendations for collecting and submitting patient
preference information to FDA; and (4) to outline

considerations for including patient preference information in labeling
for patients and health care professionals. This draft guidance
includes examples that illustrate how patient preference information
may inform FDA's regulatory decisionmaking. The guidance applies to
both diagnostic and therapeutic devices that are subject to these
review processes. Additionally, this guidance may apply to other
stakeholders such as patient groups and academia who may wish to
conduct patient preference studies.

II. Significance of Guidance

    This draft guidance is being issued consistent with FDA's good
guidance practices regulation (21 CFR 10.115). The draft guidance, when
finalized, will represent the current thinking of FDA on Patient
Preference Information--Submission, Review in PMAs, HDE Applications,
and De Novo Requests, and Inclusion in Device Labeling. It does not
establish any rights for any person and is not binding on FDA or the
public. You can use an alternative approach if it satisfies the
requirements of the applicable statutes and regulations.

III. Electronic Access

    Persons interested in obtaining a copy of the draft guidance may do
so by downloading an electronic copy from the Internet. A search
capability for all Center for Devices and Radiological Health guidance
documents is available at http://www.fda.gov/MedicalDevices/DeviceRegulationandGuidance/GuidanceDocuments/default.htm. Guidance
documents are also available at http://www.regulations.gov or from CBER
at http://www.fda.gov/BiologicsBloodVaccines/GuidanceComplianceRegulatoryInformation/default.htm. Persons unable to
download an electronic copy of ``Patient Preference Information--
Submission, Review in PMAs, HDE Applications, and De Novo Requests, and
Inclusion in Device Labeling'' may send an email request to<EMAIL_ADDRESS>to receive an electronic copy of the document.
Please use the document number 1500006 to identify the guidance you are
requesting.

IV. Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995

    This guidance refers to currently approved collections of
information found in FDA regulations. These collections of information
are subject to review by the Office of Management and Budget (OMB)
under the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 (44 U.S.C. 3501-3520). The
collections of information in 21 CFR 812.25(c) have been approved under
OMB control number 0910-0078; the collections of information in 21 CFR
part 807 subpart E have been approved under OMB control number 0910-
0120; the collections of information in 21 CFR part 814 subparts B and
E have been approved under OMB control number 0910-0231; the
collections of information in 21 CFR part 814 subpart H have been
approved under OMB control number 0910-0332; and the collections of
information in 21 CFR part 801 have been approved under OMB control
number 0910-0485.

V. Comments

    Interested persons may submit either electronic comments regarding
this document to http://www.regulations.gov or written comments to the
Division of Dockets Management (see ADDRESSES). It is only necessary to
send one set of comments. Identify comments with the docket number
found in brackets in the heading of this document. Received comments
may be seen in the Division of Dockets Management between 9 a.m. and 4
p.m., Monday through Friday, and will be posted to the docket at http://www.regulations.gov.
    Specifically the Agency would like comments on the following
questions:
    1. Section IV of the draft guidance recommends qualities for
patient preference studies. Do you believe these recommended qualities
are clear and understandable? If not, what should be reworded or
edited? Is there anything missing? If so, what needs to be added?
    2. Under what conditions should health care professional or patient
labeling include information about patient preference studies?
    3. How should sponsors present patient preference information in
the health care professional and patient labeling?
    4. How should labeling indicate that only a subset of patients in a
patient preference study were willing to accept certain risks in order
to achieve probable benefits?
    5. How should sponsors and the FDA ensure that patients receive and
understand patient preference information?

    Dated: May 12, 2015.
Leslie Kux,
Associate Commissioner for Policy.
[FR Doc. 2015-11819 Filed 5-15-15; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4164-01-P


[Federal Register Volume 78, Number 68 (Tuesday, April 9, 2013)]
[Notices]
[Pages 21136-21138]
[FR Doc No: 2013-08199]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY

Federal Emergency Management Agency

[Docket ID FEMA-2013-0002; Internal Agency Docket No. FEMA-B-1306]

Changes in Flood Hazard Determinations

AGENCY: Federal Emergency Management Agency, DHS.

ACTION: Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: This notice lists communities where the addition or
modification of Base Flood Elevations (BFEs), base flood depths,
Special Flood Hazard Area (SFHA) boundaries or zone designations, or
the regulatory floodway (hereinafter referred to as flood hazard
determinations), as shown on the Flood Insurance Rate Maps (FIRMs), and
where applicable, in the supporting Flood Insurance Study (FIS)
reports, prepared by the Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA) for
each community, is appropriate because of new scientific or technical
data. The FIRM, and where applicable, portions of the FIS report, have
been revised to reflect these flood hazard determinations through
issuance of a Letter of Map Revision (LOMR), in accordance with Title
44, Part 65 of the Code of Federal Regulations (44 CFR Part 65). The
LOMR will be used by insurance agents and others to calculate
appropriate flood insurance premium rates for new buildings and the
contents of those buildings. For rating purposes, the currently
effective community number is shown in the table below and must be used
for all new policies and renewals.

DATES: These flood hazard determinations will become effective on the
dates listed in the table below and revise the FIRM panels and FIS
report in effect prior to this determination for the listed
communities.
    From the date of the second publication of notification of these
changes in a newspaper of local circulation, any person has ninety (90)
days in which to request through the community that the Deputy
Associate Administrator for Mitigation reconsider the changes. The
flood hazard determination information may be changed during the 90-day
period.

ADDRESSES: The affected communities are listed in the table below.
Revised flood hazard information for each community is available for
inspection at both the online location and the respective community map
repository address listed in the table below. Additionally, the current
effective FIRM and FIS report for each community are accessible online
through the FEMA Map Service Center at www.msc.fema.gov for comparison.
    Submit comments and/or appeals to the Chief Executive Officer of
the community as listed in the table below.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Luis Rodriguez, Chief, Engineering
Management Branch, Federal Insurance and Mitigation Administration,
FEMA, 500 C Street SW., Washington, DC 20472,<PHONE_NUMBER>, or
(email<EMAIL_ADDRESS>or visit the FEMA Map Information
eXchange (FMIX) online at www.floodmaps.fema.gov/fhm/fmx_main.html.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The specific flood hazard determinations are
not described for each community in this notice. However, the online
location and local community map repository address where the flood
hazard determination information is available for inspection is
provided.
    Any request for reconsideration of flood hazard determinations must
be submitted to the Chief Executive Officer of the community as listed
in the table below.
    The modifications are made pursuant to section 201 of the Flood
Disaster Protection Act of 1973, 42 U.S.C. 4105, and are in accordance
with the National Flood Insurance Act of 1968, 42 U.S.C. 4001 et seq.,
and with 44 CFR Part 65.
    The FIRM and FIS report are the basis of the floodplain management
measures that the community is required either to adopt or to show
evidence of having in effect in order to qualify or remain qualified
for participation in the National Flood Insurance Program (NFIP).
    These flood hazard determinations, together with the floodplain
management criteria required by 44 CFR 60.3, are the minimum that are
required. They should not be construed to mean

that the community must change any existing ordinances that are more
stringent in their floodplain management requirements. The community
may at any time enact stricter requirements of its own or pursuant to
policies established by other Federal, State, or regional entities. The
flood hazard determinations are in accordance with 44 CFR 65.4.
    The affected communities are listed in the following table. Flood
hazard determination information for each community is available for
inspection at both the online location and the respective community map
repository address listed in the table below. Additionally, the current
effective FIRM and FIS report for each community are accessible online
through the FEMA Map Service Center at www.msc.fema.gov for comparison.

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
                                                       Chief executive                       Online location of
        State and county          Location and case      officer of         Community map       Letter of Map         Effective date of       Community
                                         No.              community          repository           Revision              modification             No.
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Arizona: Maricopa..............  Unincorporated      The Honorable Max   Maricopa County     http://             April 5, 2013.............       040037
                                  areas of Maricopa   W. Wilson,          Flood Control       www.r9map.org/
                                  County (12-09-      Chairman,           District, 2801      Docs/12-09-2950P-
                                  2950P).             Maricopa County     West Durango        040037-102IAC.pdf.
                                                      Board of            Street, Phoenix,
                                                      Supervisors, 301    AZ 85009.
                                                      West Jefferson
                                                      Street, 10th
                                                      Floor, Phoenix,
                                                      AZ 85003.
California: San Bernardino.....  City of Fontana     The Honorable       Fontana City Hall,  http://             May 13, 2013..............       060274
                                  (12-09-2642P).      Acquanetta          8353 Sierra         www.r9map.org/
                                                      Warren, Mayor,      Avenue, Fontana,    Docs/12-09-2642P-
                                                      City of Fontana,    CA 92335.           060274-102IAC.pdf.
                                                      8353 Sierra
                                                      Avenue, Fontana,
                                                      CA 92335.
Illinois:
    DuPage.....................  City of Darien (13- The Honorable       Darien City Hall,   http://www.starr-   May 28, 2013..............       170750
                                  05-1709P).          Kathleen A.         1702 Plainfield     team.com/starr/
                                                      Weaver, Mayor,      Road, Darien, IL    LOMR/Pages/
                                                      City of Darien,     60561.              RegionV.aspx.
                                                      1702 Plainfield
                                                      Road, Darien, IL
                                                      60561.
    Peoria.....................  City of Peoria (12- The Honorable Jim   City of Peoria      http://www.starr-   June 7, 2013..............       170536
                                  05-7861P).          Ardis, Mayor,       Public Works        team.com/starr/
                                                      City of Peoria,     Department, 3505    LOMR/Pages/
                                                      6141 North          North Dries Lane,   RegionV.aspx.
                                                      Evergreen Circle,   Peoria, IL 61604.
                                                      Peoria, IL 61614.
    Boone......................  Town of Zionsville  The Honorable Jeff  1100 West Oak       http://www.starr-   April 9, 2013.............       180016
                                  (12-05-6549P).      Papa, President,    Street,             team.com/starr/
                                                      Zionsville Town     Zionsville, IN      LOMR/Pages/
                                                      Council, 1100       46077.              RegionV.aspx.
                                                      West Oak Street,
                                                      Zionsville, IN
                                                      46077.
    Fulton.....................  City of Rochester   The Honorable Mark  125 East 9th        http://www.starr-   May 29, 2013..............       180071
                                  (12-05-9647P).      Smiley, Mayor,      Street,             team.com/starr/
                                                      City of             Rochester, IN       LOMR/Pages/
                                                      Rochester, 320      46975.              RegionV.aspx.
                                                      Main Street,
                                                      Rochester, IN
                                                      46975.
    Fulton.....................  Unincorporated      The Honorable Mark  125 East 9th        http://www.starr-   May 29, 2013..............       180070
                                  areas of Fulton     J. Rodriguez,       Street,             team.com/starr/
                                  County (12-05-      President, Fulton   Rochester, IN       LOMR/Pages/
                                  9647P).             County Board of     46975.              RegionV.aspx.
                                                      Commissioners,
                                                      1784 Chickory
                                                      Lane, Rochester,
                                                      IN 46975.
Iowa: Black Hawk...............  City of Cedar       The Honorable Jon   220 Clay Street,    http://www.starr-   May 31, 2013..............       190017
                                  Falls (12-07-       Crews, Mayor,       Cedar Falls, IA     team.com/starr/
                                  2641P).             City of Cedar       50613.              LOMR/Pages/
                                                      Falls, 220 Clay                         RegionVII.aspx.
                                                      Street, Cedar
                                                      Falls, IA 50613.
Michigan: Wayne................  City of Taylor (12- The Honorable       23555 Goddard       http://www.starr-   May 30, 2013..............       260728
                                  05-9857P).          Jeffrey P.          Road, Taylor, MI    team.com/starr/
                                                      Lamarand, Mayor,    48180.              LOMR/Pages/
                                                      City of Taylor,                         RegionV.aspx.
                                                      23555 Goddard
                                                      Road, Taylor, MI
                                                      48180.
Minnesota:
    Lac Qui Parle..............  City of Dawson (12- The Honorable       675 Chestnut        http://www.starr-   May 9, 2013...............       270241
                                  05-2019P).          Merlin Ellefson,    Street, Dawson,     team.com/starr/
                                                      Mayor, City of      MN 56232.           LOMR/Pages/
                                                      Dawson, 675                             RegionV.aspx.
                                                      Chestnut Street,
                                                      Dawson, MN 56232.

    Lac Qui Parle..............  Unincorporated      The Honorable       600 6th Street,     http://www.starr-   May 9, 2013...............       270239
                                  areas of Lac Qui    DeRon Brehmer,      Madison, MN         team.com/starr/
                                  Parle County (12-   Chair, Lac Qui      562256.             LOMR/Pages/
                                  05-2019P).          Parle County                            RegionV.aspx.
                                                      Board of
                                                      Commissioners,
                                                      600 6th Street,
                                                      Madison, MN
                                                      562256.
    St. Louis..................  City of Duluth (12- The Honorable Don   411 West First      http://www.starr-   April 12, 2013............       270421
                                  05-3211P).          Ness, Mayor, City   Street, Duluth,     team.com/starr/
                                                      of Duluth, 411      MN 55802.           LOMR/Pages/
                                                      West First                              RegionV.aspx.
                                                      Street, Room 402,
                                                      Duluth, MN 55802.
Missouri: Greene...............  City of             The Honorable Bob   840 Boonville       http://www.starr-   May 31, 2013..............       290149
                                  Springfield (12-    Stephens, Mayor,    Avenue,             team.com/starr/
                                  07-2302P).          City of             Springfield, MO     LOMR/Pages/
                                                      Springfield, 840    65801.              RegionVII.aspx.
                                                      Boonville Avenue,
                                                      Springfield, MO
                                                      65801.
Nebraska: Buffalo..............  City of Kearney     The Honorable       18 East 22nd        http://www.starr-   May 9, 2013...............       310016
                                  (12-07-3246P).      Stanley Clouse,     Street, Kearney,    team.com/starr/
                                                      Mayor, City of      NE 68847.           LOMR/Pages/
                                                      Kearney, 18 East                        RegionVII.aspx.
                                                      22nd Street,
                                                      Kearney, NE 68847.
Ohio: Portage..................  City of Kent (12-   The Honorable       930 Overholt        http://www.starr-   April 29, 2013............       390456
                                  05-6090P).          Jerry T. Fiala,     Drive, Kent, OH     team.com/starr/
                                                      Mayor, City of      44240.              LOMR/Pages/
                                                      Kent, 614 Pioneer                       RegionV.aspx.
                                                      Avenue, Kent, OH
                                                      44240.
Oregon:

    Jackson....................  Unincorporated      The Honorable Don   10 South Oakdale    http://www.starr-   April 5, 2013.............       415589
                                  areas of Jackson    Skundrick, Chair,   Avenue, Medford,    team.com/starr/
                                  County (12-10-      Jackson County      OR 97501.           LOMR/Pages/
                                  0825P).             Board of                                RegionX.aspx.
                                                      Commissioners, 10
                                                      South Oakdale
                                                      Avenue, Room 214,
                                                      Medford, OR 97501.
    Yamhill....................  Unincorporated      The Honorable       535 Northeast 5th   http://www.starr-   May 9, 2013...............       410249
                                  areas of Yamhill    Leslie Lewis,       Street,             team.com/starr/
                                  County (12-10-      Chair, Yamhill      McMinnville, OR     LOMR/Pages/
                                  1146P).             Board of            97128.              RegionX.aspx.
                                                      Commissioners,
                                                      434 Northeast
                                                      Evans Street,
                                                      McMinnville, OR
                                                      97128.
Washington:
    Franklin...................  Unincorporated      The Honorable Brad  1016 North 4th      http://www.starr-   April 5, 2013.............       530044
                                  areas of Franklin   Peck, Chairman,     Avenue, Pasco, WA   team.com/starr/
                                  County (12-10-      Franklin County     99301.              LOMR/Pages/
                                  0991P).             Board of                                RegionX.aspx.
                                                      Commissioners,
                                                      1016 North 4th
                                                      Avenue, Pasco, WA
                                                      99301.
    Walla Walla................  Unincorporated      The Honorable       314 West Main       http://www.starr-   April 5, 2013.............       530194
                                  areas of Walla      Gregory A.          Street, Walla       team.com/starr/
                                  Walla County (12-   Tompkins,           Walla, WA 99362.    LOMR/Pages/
                                  10-0991P).          Chairman, Walla                         RegionX.aspx.
                                                      Walla County
                                                      Board of
                                                      Commissioners,
                                                      314 West Main
                                                      Street, Walla
                                                      Walla, WA 99362.
Wisconsin:
    Kewaunee...................  City of Kewaunee    The Honorable John  401 Fifth Street,   http://www.starr-   April 26, 2013............       550215
                                  (12-05-5905P).      Blaha, Jr.,         Kewaunee, WI        team.com/starr/
                                                      Mayor, City of      54216.              LOMR/Pages/
                                                      Kewaunee, 107                           RegionV.aspx.
                                                      Summers Circle-3
                                                      388-4454,
                                                      Kewaunee, WI
                                                      54216.
    Outagamie..................  Unincorporated      The Honorable       410 South Walnut    http://www.starr-   June 3, 2013..............       550302
                                  areas of            Thomas Nelson,      Street, Appleton,   team.com/starr/
                                  Outagamie County    410 South Walnut    WI 54911.           LOMR/Pages/
                                  (12-05-7344P).      Street, Appleton,                       RegionV.aspx.
                                                      WI 54911.
    Sauk.......................  City of Wisconsin   The Honorable       300 LaCrosse        http://www.starr-   May 28, 2013..............       550065
                                  Dells (12-05-       Brian L. Landers,   Street, Wisconsin   team.com/starr/
                                  7540P).             Mayor, City of      Dells, WI 53965.    LOMR/Pages/
                                                      Wisconsin Dells,                        RegionV.aspx.
                                                      305 Bauer Court,
                                                      Wisconsin Dells,
                                                      WI 53965.
    Wood.......................  City of Wisconsin   The Honorable Zach  Engineering         http://www.starr-   April 5, 2013.............       555587
                                  Rapids (12-05-      Vruwink, Mayor,     Department, 444     team.com/starr/
                                  6906P).             City of Wisconsin   West Grand          LOMR/Pages/
                                                      Rapids, 444 West    Avenue, Wisconsin   RegionV.aspx.
                                                      Grand Avenue,       Rapids, WI 54495.
                                                      Wisconsin Rapids,
                                                      WI 54495.
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

(Catalog of Federal Domestic Assistance No. 97.022, ``Flood
Insurance.'')

Roy E. Wright,
Deputy Associate Administrator for Mitigation, Department of Homeland
Security, Federal Emergency Management Agency.
[FR Doc. 2013-08199 Filed 4-8-13; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 9110-12-P


[Federal Register: December 15, 2008 (Volume 73, Number 241)]
[Proposed Rules]
[Page 75980-75983]
[DOCID:fr15de08-20]

=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY

Coast Guard

33 CFR Part 165

[Docket No. USCG-2008-0867]
RIN 1625-AA00

Safety Zone; Desert Storm Exhibition Run; Lake Havasu, Lake
Havasu City, AZ

AGENCY: Coast Guard, DHS.

ACTION: Notice of proposed rulemaking.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Coast Guard proposes establishing a temporary safety zone
within the Thompson Bay region of the navigable waters of the Colorado
River in Lake Havasu, Lake Havasu City, Arizona in support of the
Desert Storm Exhibition Run. This temporary safety zone is would
provide for the safety of the participants, crew, spectators,
participating vessels and other vessels and users of the waterway.
Persons and vessels will be prohibited from entering into, transiting
through, or anchoring within this safety zone unless authorized by the
Captain of the Port, or his designated representative.

DATES: Comments and related material must reach the Coast Guard on or
before January 14, 2009.

ADDRESSES: You may submit comments identified by docket number USCG-
2008-0867 using any one of the following methods:
    (1) Federal eRulemaking Portal: http://www.regulations.gov.
    (2) Fax:<PHONE_NUMBER>.
    (3) Mail: Docket Management Facility (M-30), U.S. Department of
Transportation, West Building Ground Floor, Room W12-140, 1200 New
Jersey Avenue, SE., Washington, DC 20590-0001.

    (4) Hand delivery: Same as mail address above, between 9 a.m. and 5
p.m., Monday through Friday, except Federal holidays. The telephone
number is<PHONE_NUMBER>.
    (5) Fax:<PHONE_NUMBER>.
    To avoid duplication, please use only one of these methods. For
instructions on submitting comments, see the ``Public Participation and
Request for Comments'' portion of the SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION section
below.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: If you have questions on this proposed
rule, call Petty Officer Shane Jackson, USCG, Waterways Management,
U.S. Coast Guard Sector San Diego at<PHONE_NUMBER>. If you have
questions on viewing or submitting material to the docket, call Renee
V. Wright, Program Manager, Docket Operations, telephone<PHONE_NUMBER>.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

Public Participation and Request for Comments

    We encourage you to participate in this rulemaking by submitting
comments and related materials. All comments received will be posted,
without change, to http://www.regulations.gov and will include any
personal information you have provided.

Submitting comments

    If you submit a comment, please include the docket number for this
rulemaking (USCG-2008-0867), indicate the specific section of this
document to which each comment applies, and give the reason for each
comment. You may submit your comments and material online, or by fax,
mail or hand delivery, but please use only one of these means. We
recommend that you include your name and a mailing address, an e-mail
address, or a phone number in the body of your document so that we can
contact you if we have questions regarding your submission.
    To submit your comment online, go to http://www.regulations.gov,
select the Advanced Docket Search option on the right side of the
screen, insert ``USCG-2008-0867'' in the Docket ID box, press Enter,
and then click on the balloon shape in the Actions column. If you
submit your comments by mail or hand delivery, submit them in an
unbound format, no larger than 8\1/2\ by 11 inches, suitable for
copying and electronic filing. If you submit them by mail and would
like to know that they reached the Facility, please enclose a stamped,
self-addressed postcard or envelope. We will consider all comments and
material received during the comment period and may change the rule
based on your comments.

Viewing Comments and Documents

    To view comments, as well as documents mentioned in this preamble
as being available in the docket, go to http://www.regulations.gov,
select the Advanced Docket Search option on the right side of the
screen, insert USCG-2008-0867 in the Docket ID box, press Enter, and
then click on the item in the Docket ID column. You may also visit
either the Docket Management Facility in Room W12-140 on the ground
floor of the Department of Transportation West Building, 1200 New
Jersey Avenue, SE., Washington, DC 20590, between 9 a.m. and 5 p.m.,
Monday through Friday, except Federal holidays; or the Coast Guard
Sector San Diego, 2710 N. Harbor Drive, San Diego, CA 92101-1028
between 8 a.m. and 3 p.m., Monday through Friday, except Federal
holidays. We have an agreement with the Department of Transportation to
use the Docket Management Facility.

Privacy Act

    Anyone can search the electronic form of all comments received into
any of our dockets by the name of the individual submitting the comment
(or signing the comment, if submitted on behalf of an association,
business, labor union, etc.). You may review a Privacy Act, system of
records notice regarding our public dockets in the January 17, 2008
issue of the Federal Register (73 FR 3316).

Public Meeting

    We do not now plan to hold a public meeting. But you may submit a
request for one to the Docket Management Facility at the address under
ADDRESSES explaining why one would be beneficial. If we determine that
one would aid this rulemaking, we will hold one at a time and place
announced by a later notice in the Federal Register.

Background and Purpose

    Lake Racer LLC is sponsoring the Desert Storm Exhibition Run. The
event is an Exhibition Run consisting of up to 250 powerboats ranging
from 21 to 55 feet in length. The sponsor will provide 2 water rescue
boats and 20 perimeter boats for this event. This safety zone is
necessary to provide for the safety of the participants, crew,
spectators, sponsor vessels, and other users of the waterway.

Discussion of Proposed Rule

    The Coast Guard proposes to establish a safety zone that will be
enforced from 8 a.m. to 5:30 p.m. on April 24, 2009 thru April 26,
2009. This safety zone is necessary to provide for the safety of the
crews, spectators, and participants of the regatta and to protect other
vessels and users of the waterway. Persons and vessels will be
prohibited from entering into, transiting through, or anchoring within
this safety zone unless authorized by the Captain of the Port, or his
designated representative. The limits of this temporary safety zone are
enclosed by the following coordinates 34[deg]27.81N, 114[deg]20.90W;
34[deg]26.24N, 114[deg]19.28W; 34[deg]26.49N, 114[deg]18.99W. The Coast
Guard may be assisted by the other federal, state, or local agencies,
including the Coast Guard Auxiliary. Vessel or persons violating this
section will be subject to both criminal and civil penalties.

Regulatory Analyses

    We developed this proposed rule after considering numerous statutes
and executive orders related to rulemaking. Below we summarize our
analyses based on 13 of these statutes or executive orders.

Regulatory Planning and Review

    This proposed rule is not a significant regulatory action under
section 3(f) of Executive Order 12866, Regulatory Planning and Review,
and does not require an assessment of potential costs and benefits
under section 6(a)(3) of that Order. The Office of Management and
Budget has not reviewed it under that Order.
    This determination is based on the size and location of the safety
zone within the water. Commercial vessels will not be hindered by the
safety zone, as they will be able to transit safely around the zone.
Recreational vessels will not be allowed to transit through the
designated safety zone during the specified times.

Small Entities

    Under the Regulatory Flexibility Act (5 U.S.C. 601-612), we have
considered whether this proposed rule would have a significant economic
impact on a substantial number of small entities. The term ``small
entities'' comprises small businesses, not-for-profit organizations
that are independently owned and operated and are not dominant in their
fields, and governmental jurisdictions with populations of less than
50,000.
    The Coast Guard certifies under 5 U.S.C. 605(b) that this proposed
rule would not have a significant economic

impact on a substantial number of small entities. This rule would
affect the following entities, some of which might be small entities:
The owners or operators vessels intending to transit a portion of the
Colorado River from 8 a.m. to 5:30 p.m. on April 24, 2009 through April
26, 2009.
    This safety zone would not have a significant economic impact on a
substantial number of small entities for the following reasons: vessel
traffic can pass safely around the zone. Before the enforcement period,
the Coast Guard will submit an inclusion into the Local Notice to
Mariners (LNM) that will be available to the users of the river. If you
think that your business, organization, or governmental jurisdiction
qualifies as a small entity and that this rule would have a significant
economic impact on it, please submit a comment (see ADDRESSES)
explaining why you think it qualifies and how and to what degree this
rule would economically affect it.

Assistance for Small Entities

    Under section 213(a) of the Small Business Regulatory Enforcement
Fairness Act of 1996 (Pub. L. 104-121), we want to assist small
entities in understanding this proposed rule so that they can better
evaluate its effects on them and participate in the rulemaking. If the
rule would affect your small business, organization, or governmental
jurisdiction and you have questions concerning its provisions or
options for compliance, please contact Petty Officer Shane Jackson,
USCG, Waterways Management, U.S. Coast Guard Sector San Diego at (619)
278-7262. The Coast Guard will not retaliate against small entities
that question or complain about this proposed rule or any policy or
action of the Coast Guard.

Collection of Information

    This proposed rule would call for no new collection of information
under the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 (44 U.S.C. 3501-3520).

Federalism

    A rule has implications for federalism under Executive Order 13132,
Federalism, if it has a substantial direct effect on State or local
governments and would either preempt State law or impose a substantial
direct cost of compliance on them. We have analyzed this proposed rule
under that Order and have determined that it does not have implications
for federalism.

Unfunded Mandates Reform Act

    The Unfunded Mandates Reform Act of 1995 (2 U.S.C. 1531-1538)
requires Federal agencies to assess the effects of their discretionary
regulatory actions. In particular, the Act addresses actions that may
result in the expenditure by a State, local, or tribal government, in
the aggregate, or by the private sector of $100,000,000 or more in any
one year. Though this proposed rule would not result in such an
expenditure, we do discuss the effects of this rule elsewhere in this
preamble.

Taking of Private Property

    This proposed rule would not effect a taking of private property or
otherwise have taking implications under Executive Order 12630,
Governmental Actions and Interference with Constitutionally Protected
Property Rights.

Civil Justice Reform

    This proposed rule meets applicable standards in sections 3(a) and
3(b)(2) of Executive Order 12988, Civil Justice Reform, to minimize
litigation, eliminate ambiguity, and reduce burden.

Protection of Children

    We have analyzed this proposed rule under Executive Order 13045,
Protection of Children from Environmental Health Risks and Safety
Risks. This rule is not an economically significant rule and would not
create an environmental risk to health or risk to safety that might
disproportionately affect children.

Indian Tribal Governments

    This proposed rule does not have tribal implications under
Executive Order 13175, Consultation and Coordination with Indian Tribal
Governments, because it would not have a substantial direct effect on
one or more Indian tribes, on the relationship between the Federal
Government and Indian tribes, or on the distribution of power and
responsibilities between the Federal Government and Indian tribes.

Energy Effects

    We have analyzed this proposed rule under Executive Order 13211,
Actions Concerning Regulations That Significantly Affect Energy Supply,
Distribution, or Use. We have determined that it is not a ``significant
energy action'' under that order because it is not a ``significant
regulatory action'' under Executive Order 12866 and is not likely to
have a significant adverse effect on the supply, distribution, or use
of energy. The Administrator of the Office of Information and
Regulatory Affairs has not designated it as a significant energy
action. Therefore, it does not require a Statement of Energy Effects
under Executive Order 13211.

Technical Standards

    The National Technology Transfer and Advancement Act (NTTAA) (15
U.S.C. 272 note) directs agencies to use voluntary consensus standards
in their regulatory activities unless the agency provides Congress,
through the Office of Management and Budget, with an explanation of why
using these standards would be inconsistent with applicable law or
otherwise impractical. Voluntary consensus standards are technical
standards (e.g., specifications of materials, performance, design, or
operation; test methods; sampling procedures; and related management
systems practices) that are developed or adopted by voluntary consensus
standards bodies.
    This proposed rule does not use technical standards. Therefore, we
did not consider the use of voluntary consensus standards.

Environment

    We have analyzed this proposed rule under Department of Homeland
Security Management Directive 5100.1 and Commandant Instruction
M16475.lD, which guide the Coast Guard in complying with the National
Environmental Policy Act of 1969 (NEPA) (42 U.S.C. 4321-4370f), and
have made a preliminary determination under the Instruction that this
action is not likely to have a significant effect on the human
environment. An environmental analysis checklist supporting this
preliminary determination is available in the docket where indicated
under ADDRESSES. We seek any comments or information that may lead to
the discovery of a significant environmental impact from this proposed
rule.
    We seek any comments or information that may lead to the discovery
of a significant environmental impact from this proposed rule.

List of Subjects in 33 CFR Part 165

    Harbors, Marine safety, Navigation (water), Reporting and
recordkeeping requirements, Security measures, Waterways.

PART 165--REGULATED NAVIGATION AREAS AND LIMITED ACCESS AREAS

    1. The authority citation for part 165 continues to read as
follows:

    Authority: 33 U.S.C. 1226, 1231; 46 U.S.C. Chapter 701, 3306,
3703; 50 U.S.C. 191, 195; 33 CFR 1.05-1, 6.04-1, 6.04-6, 160.5;
Public Law 107-295, 116 Stat. 2064; Department of Homeland Security
Delegation No. 0170.1.

    2. Add temporary Sec.  165.T11-121 to read as follows: Sec.
165.T11-121 Safety Zone; Desert Storm Exhibition Run; Lake Havasu City,
Lake Havasu, AZ.
    (a) Location. All waters of Thompson Bay on the Colorado River and
land adjacent to those waters enclosed by the following coordinates
34[deg]27.81N, 114[deg]20.90W; 34[deg]26.24N, 114[deg]19.28W;
34[deg]26.49N, 114[deg]18.99W.
    (b) Enforcement Period. This safety zone will be enforced from 8
a.m. to 5:45 p.m. on April 25, 2009 and April 26, 2009. If the need for
the safety zone ends before the scheduled termination times, the
captain of the port will cease enforcement of this safety zone.
    (c) Definitions. (1) Designated representative, Any Commissioned,
Warrant, or Petty Officer of the Coast Guard on board Coast Guard,
Coast Guard Auxiliary or local, state, and federal law enforcement
vessels who have been authorized to act on the behalf of the Captain of
the Port San Diego.
    (2) Coast Guard Patrol Commander. A Commissioned, Warrant, or Petty
Officer who will be designated by the Captain of the Port San Diego.
    (d) Regulations. (1) In accordance with the general regulations in
Sec.  165.23 of this part, entry into, transit through, or anchoring
within this zone by all vessels is prohibited unless authorized by the
Captain of the Port, or his designated representative.
    (2) Mariners requesting permission to transit through the safety
zone may request authorization to do so from the Coast Guard Patrol
Commander. The Patrol Commander may be contacted via VHF-FM Channel 16.
    (3) All persons and vessels shall comply with the instructions of
the Captain of the Port or the designated representative.
    (4) Upon being hailed by the Coast Guard Patrol personnel, by
siren, radio, flashing light or other means, the operator of the vessel
shall proceed as directed.
    (5) The Coast Guard may be assisted by other federal, state, or
local agencies.

    Dated: November 21, 2008.
T.H. Farris,
Captain, U.S. Coast Guard, Captain of the Port Sector San Diego.
[FR Doc. E8-29579 Filed 12-12-08; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4910-15-P