[Federal Register Volume 84, Number 238 (Wednesday, December 11, 2019)]
[Notices]
[Page 67737]
[FR Doc No: 2019-26659]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission

[Docket No. ER20-517-000]

Supplemental Notice That Initial Market-Based Rate Filing
Includes Request for Blanket Section 204 Authorization; Crooked Run
Solar, LLC

    This is a supplemental notice in the above-referenced proceeding of
Crooked Run Solar, LLC's application for market-based rate authority,
with an accompanying rate tariff, noting that such application includes
a request for blanket authorization, under 18 CFR part 34, of future
issuances of securities and assumptions of liability.
    Any person desiring to intervene or to protest should file with the
Federal Energy Regulatory Commission, 888 First Street NE, Washington,
DC 20426, in accordance with Rules 211 and 214 of the Commission's
Rules of Practice and Procedure (18 CFR 385.211 and 385.214). Anyone
filing a motion to intervene or protest must serve a copy of that
document on the Applicant.
    Notice is hereby given that the deadline for filing protests with
regard to the applicant's request for blanket authorization, under 18
CFR part 34, of future issuances of securities and assumptions of
liability, is December 26, 2019.
    The Commission encourages electronic submission of protests and
interventions in lieu of paper, using the FERC Online links at http://www.ferc.gov. To facilitate electronic service, persons with internet
access who will eFile a document and/or be listed as a contact for an
intervenor must create and validate an eRegistration account using the
eRegistration link. Select the eFiling link to log on and submit the
intervention or protests.
    Persons unable to file electronically should submit an original and
5 copies of the intervention or protest to the Federal Energy
Regulatory Commission, 888 First Street NE, Washington, DC 20426.
    The filings in the above-referenced proceeding are accessible in
the Commission's eLibrary system by clicking on the appropriate link in
the above list. They are also available for electronic review in the
Commission's Public Reference Room in Washington, DC. There is an
eSubscription link on the website that enables subscribers to receive
email notification when a document is added to a subscribed docket(s).
For assistance with any FERC Online service, please email
<EMAIL_ADDRESS>or call<PHONE_NUMBER> (toll free). For
TTY, call<PHONE_NUMBER>.

    Dated: December 5, 2019.
Nathaniel J. Davis, Sr.,
Deputy Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2019-26659 Filed 12-10-19; 8:45 am]
 BILLING CODE 6717-01-P


[Federal Register Volume 82, Number 131 (Tuesday, July 11, 2017)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Pages 31916-31922]
[FR Doc No: 2017-14400]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY

40 CFR Part 52

[EPA-R05-OAR-2016-0272; FRL-9964-46-Region 5]

Air Plan Approval; Ohio; Control of Emissions of Organic
Materials That Are Not Regulated by VOC RACT Rules

AGENCY: Environmental Protection Agency (EPA).

ACTION: Direct final rule.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) is approving, under
the Clean Air Act (CAA), revisions to the Ohio Administrative Code
(OAC) rule as part of Ohio's State Implementation Plan (SIP). This rule
has generally been revised to: make minor style changes to meet Ohio's
legislative service commission style and formatting guidelines; add
specific effective dates within the rule; correct certain errors and
omissions introduced when the rule was last revised; remove facilities
and units that have been permanently shut down; update the names of
certain subject facilities; and modify certain source applicability
exclusions. Sources controlled by this rule are not covered by existing
Volatile Organic Compound (VOC) Reasonably Available Control Technology
(RACT) rules or other organic material emission control rules in Ohio's
Administrative Code.

DATES: This direct final rule is effective September 11, 2017, unless
EPA receives adverse comments by August 10, 2017. If adverse comments
are received by EPA, EPA will publish a timely withdrawal of the direct
final rule in the Federal Register informing the public that the rule
will not take effect.

ADDRESSES: Submit your comments, identified by Docket ID No. EPA-R05-
OAR-2016-0272, at https://www.regulations.gov, or via email to
<EMAIL_ADDRESS>For comments submitted at Regulations.gov,
follow the online instructions for submitting comments. Once submitted,
comments cannot be edited or removed from Regulations.gov. For either
manner of submission, EPA may publish any comment received to its
public docket. Do not submit electronically any information you
consider to be Confidential Business Information (CBI) or other
information whose disclosure is restricted by statute. Multimedia
submissions (audio, video, etc.) must be accompanied by a written
comment. The written comment is considered the official comment and
should include discussion of all points you wish to make. EPA will
generally not consider comments or comment contents located outside of
the primary submission (i.e. on the web, cloud, or other file sharing
system). For additional submission methods, please contact the person
identified in the For Further Information Contact section. For the full
EPA public comment policy, information about CBI or multimedia
submissions, and general guidance on making effective comments, please
visit https://www2.epa.gov/dockets/commenting-epa-dockets.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Kathleen D'Agostino, Environmental
Engineer, Attainment Planning and Maintenance Section, Air Programs
Branch (AR-18J), U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Region 5, 77
West Jackson Boulevard, Chicago, Illinois 60604,<PHONE_NUMBER>,
<EMAIL_ADDRESS>
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Throughout this document, whenever ``we,''
``us,'' or ``our'' is used, we mean EPA. This supplementary information
section is arranged as follows:

I. What revisions has Ohio made in rule 3745-21-07 and are they
approvable as a revision of the Ohio SIP?
II. What action is EPA taking?
III. Incorporation by Reference
IV. Statutory and Executive Order Reviews

I. What revisions has Ohio made in rule 3745-21-07 and are they
approvable as a revision of the Ohio SIP?

    The rule at OAC 3745-21-07 was adopted by the state of Ohio to
control airborne emissions of organic materials from existing (as of
the effective date of the adopted rule) sources not covered by other
VOC emission control rules in OAC 3745-21. Most recently, EPA approved
revisions to OAC 3745-21-07 into the Ohio SIP on August 19, 2011 (76 FR
51901).
    On April 29, 2016, the Ohio Environmental Protection Agency (OEPA)
submitted an amended OAC 3745-21-07, requesting that EPA approve the
rule amendments as a revision to the Ohio SIP. The following summarizes
the rule revisions and discusses whether these rule revisions are
approvable as SIP revisions.
    Where we note ``this rule'' or ``the rule,'' unless otherwise
noted, we mean OAC 3745-21-07.

3745-21-07

    The title of the rule has been revised to ``Control of emissions of
organic materials from stationary sources (i.e., emissions that are not
regulated by rule 3745--21-09, 3745-21-12 to 3745-21-16, or 3745-21-18
to 3745-21-29 of the Administrative Code.'' This title change accounts
for the addition of VOC emission control rules that now cover some of
the sources formerly covered by OAC 3745-21-07.
    (A) Applicability:
    (A)(1)--``RESERVED'' modified to ``Reserved.''
    (A)(2)--``RESERVED'' modified to ``Reserved.''
    (A)(3) -- This paragraphs states that OAC 3745-21-07 applies to any
source or operation for which installation commenced prior to February
18, 2008, and that is specified in paragraphs (K) through (N) of this
rule. This rule does not apply to VOC emissions from sources or
operations subject to rules 3745-21-09, 3745-21-12 to 3745-21-16, or
3745-21-18 to 3745-21-29. Any owner or operator of a source or
operation identified in paragraphs (K) to (N) of this rule must have
complied with the facility-specific and general emission control
requirements of this rule by February 18, 2008. This paragraph was
revised to reflect that new VOC emission control rules now cover some
of the sources formerly covered by OAC 3745-21-07.
    The other rule revision in this paragraph replaces what was
previously ``the effective date of this rule'' by a specific date,
February 18, 2008. February 18, 2008, was the effective date of the
previous version of this rule; therefore, specifying this date retains
and clarifies the date used to define the group of sources or
operations subject to the requirements of this rule and the date by
which subject emission control requirements must be implemented.
    (A)(4)--This paragraph voids emission control requirements or
operational restrictions contained in a permit-to-install, permit-by
rule, permit-to-operate, or Title V permit if the requirements refer to
photochemically reactive materials or the need to determine or document
materials as being photochemically reactive materials or any
recordkeeping and reporting requirements related to photochemically
reactive materials. The revisions to this rule paragraph include the
replacement of ``the effective date of this rule'' with the date
February 18, 2008, grammatical corrections, and the addition of rule
paragraph (N)(3) the list of emission limitations and control
requirements in paragraph (A)(4). The list should include all
paragraphs that contain an emission limitation or control requirement,
but paragraph (N)(3) was inadvertently left out when Ohio last revised
the rule.
    (A)(5)--This paragraph states that this rule shall not apply to any
source, including any new source, as defined in

rule OAC 3745-15-01, for which installation commenced after ``February
18, 2008,'' revised from ``the effective date of this rule.''
    (A)(6)--This paragraph lists the emission test methods or emission
data sources that may be used to demonstrate compliance for sources
subject to mass emission rates under the rule. This rule paragraph has
been revised to clarify that the owner or operator of a subject source
or operation may demonstrate compliance using one of the three
compliance methods listed.
    (B)-(J)--``RESERVED'' modified to ``Reserved'' for all of these
rule paragraphs.
    (K) Facility-specific control requirements for storage tanks
(stationary tank, reservoir, or other container):
    (K)(1)--This paragraph lists source facility owners or operators,
source facility IDs, and source emission unit IDs for emission units
subject to the emission control requirements in paragraph (K)(2), which
requires that the storage tanks containing any liquid organic material
that has a vapor pressure of 1.5 pounds per square inch or greater,
under actual storage conditions, be equipped with one of the following:
(a) A floating pontoon or double-deck type cover that includes closure
seals (not permitted if the liquid in the tank has a vapor pressure of
12.5 pounds per square inch absolute or greater under actual storage
conditions); or (b) a vapor recovery system or control system that
reduces the emissions of organic compounds by at least 90 percent by
weight.
    The owner or operator names in the table of facilities and
emissions units subject to the requirements of paragraph (K)(2) have
been revised as noted here: ``The Glidden Company'' has been revised to
``Akzo Nobel Coatings, Inc.;'' a subject emissions unit associated with
Azko Nobel Coatings, ``T066,'' has been removed due to permanent
shutdown; and ``Marathon Ashland Petroleum, LLC'' has been revised to
``Marathon Petroleum Company LP--Brecksville Terminal.''
    (K)(3)--This paragraph lists source facility owners or operators,
source facility IDs, and source emission unit IDs for emission units
consisting of storage tanks with capacities equal to or less than
65,000 gallons, subject to the control requirements in paragraph
(K)(4), which requires subject sources to not place, store, or hold in
any storage tank identified in (K)(3) any liquid organic material that
has a vapor pressure of 1.5 pounds per square inch absolute or greater,
under actual storage conditions, unless the storage tank is equipped
with a permanent submerged fill pipe, or is loaded through the use of a
portable loading tube, which can be inserted below the liquid level
during loading operations, or is fitted with a vapor recovery system as
described in paragraph (K)(2)(b) of this rule.
    Rule paragraph (K)(3) has been amended to remove the following
sources previously subject to the requirements of (K)(4) due to
permanent shutdown: Newark Air Force Base/AGMC (source facility
0145020224, source units T012 and T013); the Lubrizol Corporation,
Wickliffe Facility (source facility<PHONE_NUMBER>, source units T224 and
T225); Veolia Environmental Services, LLC (source facility<PHONE_NUMBER>,
source units P006, T001, T005, T007, T017, T026, T040, T042, T044,
T049, T051, T065, and T068); Clorox Company (source facility
1318000864, source unit T012); and Strongsville Expressmart (source
facility<PHONE_NUMBER>, source unit T008). For ``Hukill Chemical
Corporation'' (source facility<PHONE_NUMBER>), emissions unit T062 has
been removed due to permanent shutdown. The following subject owner/
operator names have been revised: ``Tremco, Inc.'' has been revised to
``Tremco, Inc.--Mameco Division''; ``Marathon Ashland Petroleum
Corporation'' has been revised to ``Marathon Petroleum Company LP--
Brecksville Terminal''; and ``Glastic Corporation, Cleveland Facility''
has been revised to ``Rochling Glastic Composites''.
    (L) Facility-specific control requirements for oil-water separators
(effluent water separators):
    (L)(1)--The owner/operator name of the only subject facility listed
has been revised from ``Marathon Ashland Petroleum, LLC'' to ``Marathon
Ashland, LLC--CLOW''.
    (M) Facility-specific and general control requirements for
emissions from operations using liquid organic materials:
    Table ``(M)(1) Emissions Units'' under paragraph (M)(1) lists
owners/operators, source facility IDs, and emission units subject to
the emission control requirements of paragraph (M)(2). Table (M)(1) has
been revised as follows:
    a. The following owners/operators and their associated source
facilities and emission units have been removed from the list of
applicable sources due to permanent shutdown: TS Trim Industries,
Incorporated; Plastech Engineered Products, Incorporated (two
facilities); Clean Harbors PPM, LLC; Structural North America; PFF/MFD/
STD of Avery Dennison; GE Quartz, Incorporated, Willoughby Plant;
Cantar/Polyair Corporation; Roemer Industries, Incorporated; Peerless--
Winsmith, Incorporated; Eaton INOAC, Company; Manufacturers Enameling
Corporation; Mill's Pride, Incorporated; Delphi Chassis Systems,
Needmore Operations; Delphi Classic Systems, Home Avenue; Pitney Bowes;
Veolia Environmental Services, LLC; The Chemical Solvents,
Incorporated; Queen City Barrel Company; Owens Corning Trumbull; Alex
Fries and Bros., Incorporated; and Blackhawk Automotive Plastics,
Incorporated.
    b. The following owner/operator names were revised with no other
revisions to the applicable source facility IDs or source units: ``Akzo
Nobel'' has been revised to ``Akzo Nobel Coatings, Inc.;'' ``Kraftmaid
Cabinetry, Inc., Middlefield #1'' has been revised to ``Masco Cabinetry
Middlefield LLC (KraftMaid Plant #1);'' ``Chem Development'' has been
revised to ``The Kennedy Group;'' ``LESCO, Inc.'' has been revised to
``Turf Care Supply Corp.--Martins Ferry Plant;'' ``Merillat Industries,
Inc.'' has been revised to ``Masco Cabinetry, Merillat, Jackson;''
``CDR Pigments and Dispersions'' has been revised to ``Flint Group
Pigments; and ``Emerald Polymer Additives'' has been revised to
``Emerald Performance Materials LLC.''
    c. The following subject sources have been removed because they
were erroneously included in table (M)(1) when the rule was last
revised: \1\ Waste Technologies Industries, Incorporated (facility ID
0215020233); \2\ Troy Laminating and Coating, Incorporated (facility ID
0855140077); and, emissions units P008 and P009 at Thermoseal,
Incorporated (facility ID<PHONE_NUMBER>) \3\ (in addition, emissions units
P001-P005 and P011-P012 have been removed due to permanent shutdown);
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \1\ When the rule was last revised, table (M)(1) was established
to list emission units covered by the prior SIP-approved version of
3745-21-07. Emissions control was not required for units emitting
less than 8 lbs/hr and 40 lbs/day. Because the potential emissions
from the subject units are below this level, these units should not
have been listed in table (M)(1).
    \2\ Regardless of the applicability of OAC 3745-21-07, these
tanks will continue to be controlled through 40 CFR 61, subpart FF
(National Emissions Standard for Benzene Waste Operations) and 40
CFR 63, subpart DD (National Emissions Standard for Hazardous Air
Pollutants from Off-Site Waste and Recovery Operations).
    \3\ Regardless of the applicability of OAC 3745-21-07, emission
units P009, P010, and P014 at Troy Laminating and Coating and P008
and P009 at Thermoseal will continue to be controlled through best
available technology pursuant to SIP-approved rule OAC 3745-31-05.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    d. The entries for the following subject sources have been revised
as described:
    1. ``Safety Kleen Corp.--Hebron Recycle Center'' has been revised
to

``Clean Harbors Recycling Services of Ohio L.L.C.,'' emission unit P002
has been removed due to permanent shutdown, and the facility ID
(0145020235) remains unchanged;
    2. Iten Industries, Incorporated, Plant 1 (facility ID<PHONE_NUMBER>)
has been removed because the only subject emissions unit (P003) does
not meet the applicability requirements set forth in paragraph (M)(3);
    3. Pinney Deck and Transport Company (facility ID<PHONE_NUMBER>) has
been removed because the source was erroneously included in table
(M)(1) since the only subject emissions unit (P001), an air stripper
for treating contaminated ground water, is the actual process and is
not considered emissions control and should not have been listed in the
rule;
    4. ``Ohio Sealants'' has been revised to ``Henkel Consumer
Adhesives, Inc.,'' emission unit P003 has been removed due to permanent
shut down, and the facility ID<PHONE_NUMBER>) remains unchanged;
    5. ``Noveen, Inc.'' has been revised to ``Lubrizol Advanced
Materials,'' emission units P020 and P026 have been removed due to shut
down, and the facility ID<PHONE_NUMBER>) remains unchanged;
    6. Degussa Initiators, LLC has been removed because the subject
units do not use photochemically reactive materials;
    7. ``The Glidden Company'' has been revised to ``Akzo Nobel
Coatings, Inc.,'' emission units P007 and P008 have been removed due to
permanent shutdown, and the facility ID<PHONE_NUMBER>) remains unchanged;
    8. Guardian Manufacturing (facility ID<PHONE_NUMBER>): Emission unit
IDs P001, P002, and P004 have been renamed as P801, P802, and P804;
    9. Union Tank Car Company (facility ID<PHONE_NUMBER>) has been removed
because its subject emissions unit, P002, does not employ a liquid
organic material, which is a criterion for rule applicability;
    10. BASF Corporation (facility ID<PHONE_NUMBER>): Emission unit P011
has been removed because it is now part of P028 (which is listed);
    11. Greenville Technologies, Inc. (facility ID<PHONE_NUMBER>):
Emission units K001, K002, K003, and K005 have been removed due to
permanent shutdown;
    12. Dupont Electronic Polymers, LP (facility ID<PHONE_NUMBER>): For
emission units P025 and P027, the applicability of paragraph (M)(2) has
been restricted to when these units are in methylene chloride service
(which is acceptable because emissions under non-methylene chloride
operations are less than eight pounds per hour, which is lower than the
applicability cut point in the original rule);
    13. ``Eurand'' has been revised to ``Aptalis Pharmatech, Inc.,''
emission unit P013 has been removed due to permanent shutdown, and the
facility ID<PHONE_NUMBER>) remains unchanged;
    14. Neaton Auto Products Manufacturing, Inc. (facility ID
08680300155): Emission unit R003 has been added because it was
installed in 2007 and inadvertently omitted from the previous rule
revision;
    15. Rohm and Haas Chemicals, LLC (facility ID<PHONE_NUMBER>): Emission
unit P508 has been removed due to permanent shutdown.
    16. Day-Glo Color Corp. (facility ID<PHONE_NUMBER>): Emission units
P001, P002, P008, P009, P024, P026, P027, and P030 have been added; \4\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \4\ On January 22, 2015 the facility submitted a notification to
Ohio EPA indicating that these emissions units should be added to
paragraph (M)(1) as required by paragraph (M)(3)(b).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    17. ``Polymers Additives'' with facility ID<PHONE_NUMBER> and emission
units P027 and P034 has been added; \5\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \5\ On January 22, 2015 the facility submitted a notification to
Ohio EPA indicating that these emissions units should be added to
paragraph (M)(1) as required by paragraph (M)(3)(b).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    18. ``Ineos ABS Corporation'' has been revised to ``Ineos ABS (USA)
Corporation,'' emission unit P021 has been removed because it was
mistakenly included in the prior revision to this rule,\6\ emission
units P010 and P036 have been added because these continuous polymer
drying operation emissions units were inadvertently left out of the
prior revision to this rule, and the facility ID<PHONE_NUMBER>) remains
unchanged;
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \6\ The potential organic compound emissions for emissions unit
P021 are less than 8 lbs/hr and 40 lbs/day, therefore, emissions
control is not required.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    19. H.B. Fuller Company (facility ID<PHONE_NUMBER>): Emission units
P003-P006 have been removed due to permanent shutdown;
    20. ``Ruetgers Organics Corporation'' has been revised to ``Nease
Corporation,'' emission unit P025 has been removed due to permanent
shutdown; and facility ID<PHONE_NUMBER>) remains unchanged;
    21. PMC Specialties, Inc. (facility ID 141390137): Emission unit
P022 has been removed due to permanent shutdown;
    22. St. Bernard Soap Company has been removed because the subject
emission units at this source never employed any photochemically
reactive materials and thus should never have been included in the
rule; and,
    23. ``PPB Industries, Barberton Plant'' has been split into two
separate facilities, ``PPG Industries, South Plant'' (with facility ID
1677020162 and unit P099) and ``PPG Industries, Teslin Plant'' (with
facility ID<PHONE_NUMBER> and units P110, P114, and P115 \7\), and
emission unit P098 has been removed because it is exempt from the
rule.\8\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \7\ Emissions unit P115 was installed in November 2007 and
inadvertently left out of the prior revision of this rule.
    \8\ This emissions unit is exempt from the requirements of
paragraphs (M)(3)(a), (M)(2) and (M)(1) per paragraph (M)(3)(c)(iv),
which exempts an emissions unit that is subject to and complying
with a federal regulation that specifies an overall control
efficiency for organic compound or VOC emissions that is greater
than eighty-five percent, by weight. This emissions unit is subject
to 40 CFR part 63, subpart FFFF, which requires total organic HAP
emissions to be reduced by at least 98% by weight or to an outlet
concentration of 20 ppmv or less.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    (M)(2)--This paragraph requires each article, machine, equipment or
other contrivance identified in paragraph (M)(1) or meeting paragraph
(M)(3)(a) of the subject rule (3745-21-07) to be equipped with a
control system that reduces the organic compound emissions from the
source by an overall control efficiency of at least 85 percent, by
weight. If the emission reductions are achieved by incineration, the
incineration must oxidate the carbon in the captured organic material
to carbon dioxide by 90 percent or more. Paragraph (M)(2) has been
edited to revise the phrase ``meeting the specifications of paragraph
(M)(3)(a)'' to ``meeting paragraph (M)(3)(a).''
    (M)(3)--This paragraph covers other operations using liquid organic
materials.
    (M)(3)(a)--This paragraph lists nine conditions in (M)(3)(a)(i) to
(M)(3)(a)(ix). Any article, machine, equipment or contrivance meeting
all of these conditions must comply with the emission control
requirements in (M)(2).
    (M)(3)(a)(ii)--This paragraph has been revised from ``Commenced
installation prior to the effective date of the rule'' to ``Commenced
installation prior to February 18, 2008.''
    (M)(3)(a)(v)--This paragraph states that emissions are not subject
to (M)(2) if they are subject to control requirements specified in
other listed rules. The list of rules has been simplified and expanded
by revising from ``3745-21-09, 3745-12, 3745-13, 3745-14, 3745-15,
3745-16, or 3745-21-18'' to ``3745-21-09, 3745-12 to 3745-16, or 3745-
21-18 to 3745-21-29.'' This is acceptable because the emissions subject
to the additional rules listed are being controlled under those rules.
    (M)(3)(a)(ix)--This paragraph, which excludes fuel burning
equipment as

defined in rule 3745-17-01, has been revised to remove the
identification of the specific paragraph under 3745-17-01 that contains
the definition of fuel burning equipment.
    (M)(3)(b)--This paragraph requires the owner/operator of a source
meeting the conditions of this paragraph to notify OEPA of the need to
include the subject owner/operator, facility ID, and source ID in the
list of applicable sources under paragraph (M)(1). Paragraph (M)(3)(b)
has been revised to include the following revisions: (1) ``meeting the
specifications of paragraph (M)(3)(a) of this rule'' has been revised
to ``meeting paragraph (M)(3)(a) of this rule''; (2) ``Ohio
environmental protection agency'' has been revised to ``Ohio EPA''; and
(3) the time limit for notifying OEPA has been revised from ``within
ninety days after the effective date of this rule'' to ``by May 18,
2008.'' This corresponds with the revision in language elsewhere in the
rule from ``the effective date of this rule'' to ``February 18, 2008.''
    (M)(3)(c)--This paragraph states that any article, equipment, or
other contrivance that meets any of the conditions of this paragraph
shall not be subject to the conditions and requirements of paragraphs
(M)(3)(a) and (M)(3)(b). Paragraph (M)(3)(c) has been revised to
convert ``subject to the requirements of paragraphs (M)(3)(a) and
(M)(3)(b)'' to ``subject to paragraphs (M)(3)(a) and (M)(3)(b).''
    (M)(3)(c)(i)--This paragraph provides a source installation time
cutoff, which has been revised from ``commenced installation after the
effective date of this rule'' to ``commenced installation after
February 18, 2008.''
    (M)(3)(c)(vi)--This paragraph exempts a heatset web offset printing
line that is subject to and complying with a best available technology
requirement pursuant to rule 3745-31-05, and that specifies the
dryer(s) is to be equipped with a control device having either a
control efficiency for organic compound or volatile organic compound
emissions that is equal to or greater than 90 percent, by weight, or an
outlet concentration of less than 20 parts per million, by volume, dry
basis. This condition has been revised to replace ``dryer(s)'' with
``dryer.''
    (M)(3)(d)--This paragraph exempts specified articles, machines,
equipment or other contrivances from the requirements of paragraphs
(M)(3)(a) and (M)(3)(b). The beginning of this paragraph has been
modified by the conversion of the phrase ``subject to the requirements
of paragraphs (M)(3)(a) and (M)(3)(b)'' to the phrase ``subject to
paragraphs (M)(3)(a) and (M)(3)(b).''
    (M)(3)(d)(i)--This paragraph exempts emission units identified in
the remaining paragraphs in (M)(3)(d) that obtain an alternative
emission limit or emission control requirement pursuant to paragraph
(M)(5)(e). Paragraph (M)(3)(d)(x) has been deleted to correct an
apparent typographical error.
    (M)(3)(d)(iii)--The owner/operator listed in this paragraph has
been revised from ``The Nylonge Corporation'' to ``3M Elyria'' and to
remove emissions unit P005 due to permanent shutdown.
    (M)(3)(d)(v)--This paragraph has been modified by the conversion of
the phrase ``to the levels specified'' to the phrase ``as specified.''
    (M)(3)(d)(vi)--The owner/operator listed in this paragraph has been
revised from ``Honda Marysville Auto Plant'' to ``Honda of America
Mfg., Inc., Marysville Auto Plant'' and the subject facility ID has
been revised from ``0180000130'' to ``0180010193.''
    (M)(3)(d)(vii) and (M)(3)(d)(viii)--These paragraphs have been
removed due to the permanent shutdown of ``Honda Anna Engine Plant''
and ``Florida Production Engineering.''
    (M)(3)(d)(ix)--The owner/operator listed in this paragraph has been
revised from ``PPG Industries, Barberton Plant'' to ``PPG Industries,
North Plant'' and the subject facility ID has been revised from
``1677020009'' to ``1677020163''.
    (M)(3)(e)--This paragraph controls VOC emissions from the
application of adhesives or other coatings at flock lines at the Cooper
Standard Automotive, LLC facility in Bowling Green. This rule paragraph
contains the following rule revisions: (1) Flock line 1 has been
removed due to permanent shutdown and (2) the emissions units for flock
lines 2, 3, and 4 have been renumbered to ``P078, P079, and P080 in
accordance with permit-to-install P0111501.''
    (M)(3)(f)--This paragraph, which controlled the VOC emissions from
a windshield glass system coating operation at the ``GMC Truck and Bus
Group Moraine'' facility, has been deleted due to permanent shutdown of
the facility.
    (M)(3)(g)--This paragraph, except as provided in paragraphs
(M)(3)(h) and (M)(5), applies to all existing sources located in a
``Priority I'' county, as identified in rule 3745-21-06 of the Ohio
Administrative Code and to new sources, as defined in rule 3745-15-01
of the Ohio Administrative Code, regardless of location, for which
installation commenced prior to the effective date this rule. This rule
paragraph has been revised to replace ``the effective date of this
rule'' with ``February 18, 2008.''
    (M)(3)(h)--This paragraph applied to emissions unit P027 at Venture
Holdings Corporation--Conneaut Facility (currently known as Continental
Structural Plastics, facility ID<PHONE_NUMBER>). This paragraph was
removed because the emissions unit is exempt from this rule per OAC
rule 3745-21-25(A)(3), which states that ``upon achieving compliance
with this rule, the reinforced plastic composites production operations
at the facility are not required to meet the requirements of rule 3745-
21-07 of the Administrative Code.''
    (M)(4)--This paragraph, except as provided in paragraph (M)(5) of
this rule, applies to all existing sources in a ``Priority I'' county,
as identified in rule 3745-21-06 of the Ohio Administrative Code, and
to all new sources, as defined in rule 3745-15-01, regardless as
location, for which installation commenced prior to the effective date
of this rule. This rule paragraph has been revised to replace ``the
effective date of this rule'' with ``February 18, 2008.''
    (M)(5) Exemptions.
    (M)(5)(a)--This paragraph states that paragraph (M)(2) shall not
apply to the use of any cleanup material in any article, machine,
equipment or other contrivance described in paragraph (M)(2). This rule
paragraph has been modified by the conversion of the phrase ``The
provisions of paragraph (M)(2)'' to the phrase ``Paragraph (M)(2).''
    (M)(5)(b)--This paragraph states that paragraphs (M)(2), (M)(3)(a),
and (M)(4) shall not apply for material used in sources described in
paragraphs (M)(2), (M)(3)(a), and (M)(4) if the emission is not a VOC.
This paragraph has been modified by the conversion of the phrase ``The
provisions of paragraph'' to ``Paragraph.''
    (M)(5)(c)--The beginning of this paragraph has been modified by the
conversion of the phrase ``The provisions of paragraph'' to
``Paragraph.''
    (M)(5)(d)--The beginning of this paragraph been modified by the
conversion of the phrase ``The provisions of paragraph'' to
``Paragraphs.'' This paragraph contains two exemptions [(M)(5)(d)(i)
and (ii)] based on the use of low VOC content material. Originally
these exemptions only applied to paragraph (M)(4). Paragraph (M)(5)(d)
now also applies these exemptions to paragraphs (M)(1), (M)(2), and
(M)(3)(a). These exemptions were provided for in a previous SIP-
approved version of the rule but were erroneously omitted in the last
rule revision. In addition, the beginning of both paragraphs
(M)(5)(d)(i) and

(M)(5)(d)(ii) have been revised by converting the phrase ``The volatile
content of the material described in paragraph (M)(4)'' to the phrase
``The volatile content of the material used in any article, machine,
equipment, or other contrivance described in paragraph (M)(1), (M)(2),
(M)(3)(a) or (M)(4).''
    Note that recordkeeping provisions for these exemptions were also
added in new paragraph (M)(5)(j) to allow subject emissions units to
switch between exempt and non-exempt liquid organic materials with
respect to paragraph (M)(5)(d).
    (M)(5)(e)--The beginning of this paragraph has been modified by the
conversion of the phrase ``The provisions of paragraphs'' to the phrase
``Paragraphs.'' This rule paragraph exempts sources from the emission
controls in rule paragraphs (M)(2), (M)(3)(d), (M)(3)(e), (M)(3)(f),
(M)(3)(g), (M)(3)(h), and (M)(4) if the conditions contained in
(M)(5)(e)(i), (ii), and (iii) are met.
    (M)(5)(e)(i)--This condition deals with a situation where best
available control technology is less stringent than or inconsistent
with the emission control requirements in rule paragraph (M). A number
of revisions have been made in this condition, and the revised
condition now reads as:

    The director has determined that requirements equivalent to best
available technology for the article, machine, equipment or other
contrivance is a control requirement or emission limitation that is
either less stringent than or inconsistent with paragraph (M) of
this rule. The equivalent best available technology requirement
shall be consistent with division (F) of section 3704.01 of the
Revised Code, equivalent to best available technology under rule
3745-31-05 of the Administrative Code for the purpose of this
paragraph, shall provide, where a control requirement or emission
limitation is applicable, the lowest emission limitation that the
article, machine, equipment or other contrivance is capable of
meeting by the application of control that is reasonably available
considering technological and economic feasibility. Also, for
article, machine, equipment or other contrivance located within an
ozone nonattainment area, the best available technology
determination must comply with Section 193 of the Clean Air Act
amendments of 1990, general savings clause.

    This revision allows sources constructed before 1976 that do not
trigger the applicability of OAC rule 375-31-05, to voluntarily accept
best available technology requirements equivalent to those contained
375-31-05 and thus qualify for the same exemption that subject sources
can obtain.
    (M)(5)(e)(ii)--This condition applies when EPA has notified OEPA in
writing, prior to the issuance of a final permit-to-install, that EPA
has no objection to the issuance of the permit. In this paragraph
``Ohio environmental protection agency'' has been revised to ``Ohio
EPA;'' and,
    (M)(5)(e)(iii)--This condition applies where a final permit-to-
install has been issued by OEPA pursuant to Chapter 3745-31 of the
Administrative Code. In this paragraph, ``Ohio environmental protection
agency'' has been revised to ``Ohio EPA.''
    (M)(5)(f)--This paragraph provides an exemption from paragraph (M)
requirements for the use of liquid organic material whose emissions are
regulated by specified emission control rules. This paragraph has been
modified by the conversion of the phrase ``The provisions of paragraph
(M)'' to the phrase ``Paragraph (M).'' The specified emission control
rule list has been revised to include rules ``3745-21-09, 3745-21-12 to
3745-21-16, or 3745-21-18 to 3745-21-29 of the Administrative Code.''
This revision accounts for the addition of VOC emission control rules
that now cover some of the sources formerly covered by OAC 3745-21-07.
    (M)(5)(g)--This paragraph exempts sources located in Darke,
Fairfield, Madison, Perry, Pickaway, Preble, or Union Counties and
located within facilities having the potential to emit not more than
100 tons of organic material per year from the requirements of
paragraphs (M)(3)(a), (M)(3)(b), (M)(3)(g), and (M)(4). The beginning
of this paragraph has been modified by the conversion of the phrase
``The provisions of paragraphs'' to ``Paragraphs.''
    (M)(5)(h)--The beginning of this paragraph has been revised from
``The provisions of paragraph'' to ``Paragraph.''
    (M)(5)(i)--This paragraph been added: ``Paragraph (M)(2) of this
rule shall not apply to the use of phenolic urethane cold box resin
binder system in foundry core-making and mold-making operations,
provided the catalyst gas emissions are vented to a control device that
is designed and operated to remove at least ninety-eight per cent by
weight, of the catalyst gas emissions or maintain a maximum catalyst
gas outlet concentration of one ppmv on a dry basis, whichever is less
stringent. (In a phenolic urethane cold box resin binder system, sand
is mixed with a two-part liquid urethane resin binder, and a catalyst
gas is blown into the resin-coated sand to cause hardening.)'' This
exemption was contained in a previous SIP-approved version of this
rule, but was erroneously omitted during the last revision.
    (M)(5)(j)--This paragraph was added to require the owner or
operator of an article, machine, equipment or other contrivance that is
exempt per paragraph (M)(5)(d) of this rule to maintain the following
records for all materials used. This addition ensures the
enforceability of the rule provisions.
    (M)(5)(j)(i)--The name and identification number of each liquid
organic material used.
    (M)(5)(j)(ii)--The composition of each material including the
volatile content by volume percent of water. If exempt because of
paragraph (M)(5)(d)(i) of this rule then the liquid organic material
content, except water, relative to the volatile content (per cent by
volume) or, if exempt because of paragraph (M)(5)(d)(ii) of this rule,
the volatile content relative to the total material (per cent by
volume).
    (M)(5)(j)(iii)--All time periods (beginning and ending dates and
time) for each material that is exempt per paragraph (M)(5)(d) of this
rule.
    (N) Facility-specific control requirements for waste gas flare
systems:
    (N)(1)--This paragraph specifies the owners/operators, facility
IDs, and emission units subject to the control requirements of
paragraph (N)(2). ``CECOS International'' (facility ID<PHONE_NUMBER>) was
removed from paragraph (N)(1) due to permanent shutdown of the
facility.
    (N)(3)--The owner/operator listed in this paragraph has been
revised from ``Aircraft Braking Systems, Corp.'' to ``Meggitt Aircraft
Braking Systems, Corp.''.

II. What action is EPA taking?

    EPA is approving, as part of Ohio's SIP, OAC rule 3745-21-07, as
revised, now entitled ``Control of emissions of organic materials from
stationary sources (i.e., emissions that are not regulated by rule
3745-21-09, 3745-21-12 to 3745-21-16, or 3745-21-18 to 3745-21-29 of
the Administrative Code.''
    We are publishing this action without prior proposal because we
view this as a noncontroversial amendment and anticipate no adverse
comments. However, in the proposed rules section of this Federal
Register publication, we are publishing a separate document that will
serve as the proposal to approve the state plan if relevant adverse
written comments are filed. This rule will be effective September 11,
2017 without further notice unless we receive relevant adverse written
comments by August

10, 2017. If we receive such comments, we will withdraw this action
before the effective date by publishing a subsequent document that will
withdraw the final action. All public comments received will then be
addressed in a subsequent final rule based on the proposed action. EPA
will not institute a second comment period. Any parties interested in
commenting on this action should do so at this time. Please note that,
if EPA receives adverse comment on an amendment, paragraph, or section
of this rule and if that provision may be severed from the remainder of
the rule, EPA may adopt as final those provisions of the rule that are
not the subject of an adverse comment. If we do not receive any
comments, this action will be effective September 11, 2017.

III. Incorporation by Reference

    In this rule, EPA is finalizing regulatory text that includes
incorporation by reference. In accordance with requirements of 1 CFR
51.5, EPA is finalizing the incorporation by reference of the Ohio
Regulations described in the proposed amendments to 40 CFR part 52 set
forth below. Therefore, these materials have been approved by EPA for
inclusion in the SIP, have been incorporated by reference by EPA into
that plan, are fully federally enforceable under sections 110 and 113
of the CAA as of the effective date of the final rulemaking of EPA's
approval, and will be incorporated by reference by the Director of the
Federal Register in the next update to the SIP compilation.\9\ EPA has
made, and will continue to make, these materials generally available
through www.regulations.gov and/or at the EPA Region 5 Office (please
contact the person identified in the FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT
section of this preamble for more information).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \9\ 62 FR 27968 (May 22, 1997).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

IV. Statutory and Executive Order Reviews

    Under the CAA the Administrator is required to approve a SIP
submission that complies with the provisions of the CAA and applicable
Federal regulations. 42 U.S.C. 7410(k); 40 CFR 52.02(a). Thus, in
reviewing SIP submissions, EPA's role is to approve state choices,
provided that they meet the criteria of the CAA. Accordingly, this
action merely approves state law as meeting Federal requirements and
does not impose additional requirements beyond those imposed by state
law. For that reason, this action:
     Is not a significant regulatory action subject to review
by the Office of Management and Budget under Executive Orders 12866 (58
FR 51735, October 4, 1993) and 13563 (76 FR 3821, January 21, 2011);
     Does not impose an information collection burden under the
provisions of the Paperwork Reduction Act (44 U.S.C. 3501 et seq.);
     Is certified as not having a significant economic impact
on a substantial number of small entities under the Regulatory
Flexibility Act (5 U.S.C. 601 et seq.);
     Does not contain any unfunded mandate or significantly or
uniquely affect small governments, as described in the Unfunded
Mandates Reform Act of 1995 (Pub. L. 104-4);
     Does not have Federalism implications as specified in
Executive Order 13132 (64 FR 43255, August 10, 1999);
     Is not an economically significant regulatory action based
on health or safety risks subject to Executive Order 13045 (62 FR
19885, April 23, 1997);
     Is not a significant regulatory action subject to
Executive Order 13211 (66 FR 28355, May 22, 2001);
     Is not subject to requirements of Section 12(d) of the
National Technology Transfer and Advancement Act of 1995 (15 U.S.C. 272
note) because application of those requirements would be inconsistent
with the CAA; and
     Does not provide EPA with the discretionary authority to
address, as appropriate, disproportionate human health or environmental
effects, using practicable and legally permissible methods, under
Executive Order 12898 (59 FR 7629, February 16, 1994).
    In addition, the SIP is not approved to apply on any Indian
reservation land or in any other area where EPA or an Indian tribe has
demonstrated that a tribe has jurisdiction. In those areas of Indian
country, the rule does not have tribal implications and will not impose
substantial direct costs on tribal governments or preempt tribal law as
specified by Executive Order 13175 (65 FR 67249, November 9, 2000).
    The Congressional Review Act, 5 U.S.C. 801 et seq., as added by the
Small Business Regulatory Enforcement Fairness Act of 1996, generally
provides that before a rule may take effect, the agency promulgating
the rule must submit a rule report, which includes a copy of the rule,
to each House of the Congress and to the Comptroller General of the
United States. EPA will submit a report containing this action and
other required information to the U.S. Senate, the U.S. House of
Representatives, and the Comptroller General of the United States prior
to publication of the rule in the Federal Register. A major rule cannot
take effect until 60 days after it is published in the Federal
Register. This action is not a ``major rule'' as defined by 5 U.S.C.
804(2).
    Under section 307(b)(1) of the CAA, petitions for judicial review
of this action must be filed in the United States Court of Appeals for
the appropriate circuit by September 11, 2017. Filing a petition for
reconsideration by the Administrator of this final rule does not affect
the finality of this action for the purposes of judicial review nor
does it extend the time within which a petition for judicial review may
be filed, and shall not postpone the effectiveness of such rule or
action. Parties with objections to this direct final rule are
encouraged to file a comment in response to the parallel notice of
proposed rulemaking for this action published in the proposed rules
section of today's Federal Register, rather than file an immediate
petition for judicial review of this direct final rule, so that EPA can
withdraw this direct final rule and address the comment in the proposed
rulemaking. This action may not be challenged later in proceedings to
enforce its requirements. (See section 307(b)(2).)

List of Subjects in 40 CFR Part 52

    Environmental protection, Air pollution control, Incorporation by
reference, Intergovernmental relations, Ozone, Reporting and
recordkeeping requirements, Volatile organic compounds.

    Dated: June 21, 2017.
Robert A. Kaplan,
Acting Regional Administrator, Region 5.

    40 CFR part 52 is amended as follows:

PART 52--APPROVAL AND PROMULGATION OF IMPLEMENTATION PLANS

0
1. The authority citation for part 52 continues to read as follows:

    Authority:  42 U.S.C. 7401 et seq.

0
2. In Sec.  52.1870, the table in paragraph (c) is amended under
``Chapter 3745-21 Carbon Monoxide, Ozone, Hydrocarbon Air Quality
Standards, and Related Emission Requirements'' by revising the entry
for ``3745-21-07'' to read as follows:

Sec.  52.1870  Identification of plan.

* * * * *
    (c) * * *

                                          EPA-Approved Ohio Regulations
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
                                           Ohio effective
     Ohio citation        Title/subject         date                EPA approval date                Notes
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

                                                  * * * * * * *
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
  Chapter 3745-72 Carbon Monoxide, Ozone, Hydrocarbon Air Quality Standards, and Related Emission Requirements
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

                                                  * * * * * * *
3745-21-07............  Control of               4/8/2016  7/11/17, [insert Federal Register   .................
                         emissions of                       citation].
                         organic
                         materials from
                         stationary
                         sources (i.e.,
                         emissions that
                         are not
                         regulated by
                         rule 3745-21-09,
                         3745-21-12 to
                         3745-21-16, or
                         3745-21-18 to
                         3745-21-29 of
                         the
                         Administrative
                         Code).

                                                  * * * * * * *
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

* * * * *
[FR Doc. 2017-14400 Filed 7-10-17; 8:45 am]
 BILLING CODE 6560-50-P


[Federal Register: March 31, 2011 (Volume 76, Number 62)]
[Notices]
[Page 17927-17928]
[DOCID:fr31mr11-70]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES

Food and Drug Administration

[Docket No. FDA-2011-N-0151]

Withdrawal of Approval of New Animal Drug Applications; Chorionic
Gonadotropin; Cuprimyxin; Diethylcarbamazine; Levamisole;
Nitrofurazone; Phenylbutazone; Pyrantel; Tylosin; Tylosin and
Sulfamethazine

AGENCY: Food and Drug Administration, HHS.

ACTION: Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Food and Drug Administration (FDA) is withdrawing approval
of 13 new animal drug applications (NADAs). In a final rule published
elsewhere in this issue of the Federal Register, FDA is amending the
regulations to remove portions reflecting approval of these NADAs.

DATES: Withdrawal of approval is effective April 11, 2011.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: John Bartkowiak, Center for Veterinary
Medicine (HFV-212), Food and Drug Administration, 7519 Standish Pl.,
Rockville, MD 20855,<PHONE_NUMBER>, e-mail<EMAIL_ADDRESS>
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The sponsors of the 13 approved NADAs listed
in table 1 have requested that FDA withdraw approval because the
products are no longer manufactured or marketed.

                       Table 1--Voluntary Requests for Withdrawal of Approval of 13 NADAs
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
                                         NADA No. Product (Established   21 CFR Section Affected (Sponsor's Drug
                Sponsor                          Name of Drug)                        Labeler Code)
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Roche Vitamins, Inc., 45 Waterview      NADA 093-029..................  524.520
 Blvd., Parsippany, NJ 07054-1298.      UNITOP Cream..................  (063238)
                                        (cuprimyxin)..................
Quali-Tech Products, Inc., 318 Lake     NADA 097-981..................  558.630
 Hazeltine Dr., Chaska, MN 55318.       TYLAN 40 Sulfa-G Premix.......  (016968)
                                        (tylosin phosphate/
                                         sulfamethazine).
Abraxis Pharmaceutical Products,        NADA 100-840..................  522.1081
 Division of Abraxis Bioscience, 6133   Chorionic Gonadotropin for      (063323)
 River Rd., suite 500, Rosemont, IL      Injection.
 60018.                                 (chorionic gonadotropin)......
Furst-McNess Co., Freeport, IL 61032..  NADA 100-991..................  558.625
                                        McNess Custom Premix L200.....  (010439)
                                        (tylosin phosphate)...........
Fort Dodge Animal Health, Division of   NADA 101-079..................  Not codified
 Wyeth Holdings, a wholly owned         TRAMISOL-10% Pig Wormer.......  (000856)
 subsidiary of Pfizer, Inc., 235 East   (levamisole)..................
 42d St., New York, NY 10017.
Waterloo Mills Co., 2050 Mitchell       NADA 101-905..................  558.625
 Ave., Waterloo, IA 50704.              Mill Co-Medicator TY-10.......  (017139)
                                        (tylosin phosphate)...........
Waterloo Mills Co., 2050 Mitchell       NADA 101-906..................  558.630
 Ave., Waterloo, IA 50704.              Mill Co-Medicator TS-40 Premix  (017139)
                                        (tylosin phosphate/
                                         sulfamethazine).
Pegasus Laboratories, Inc., 8809 Ely    NADA 102-824..................  520.1720a
 Rd., Pensacola, FL 32514.              Phenylbutazone Tablets........  (055246)
                                        (phenylbutazone)..............
Wendt Laboratories, Inc., 100 Nancy     NADA 108-487..................  520.622a
 Dr., Belle Plaine, MN 56011.           DEC Tabs......................  (015579)
                                        (diethylcarbamazine citrate)..
Wendt Laboratories, Inc., 100 Nancy     NADA 108-863..................  520.622c
 Dr., Belle Plaine, MN 56011.           DEC Chewable Tabs.............  (015579)
                                        (diethylcarbamazine citrate)..
Furst-McNess Co., Freeport, IL 61032..  NADA 140-820..................  558.630
                                        TYLAN 40 Sulfa-G Premix.......  (010439)
                                        (tylosin phosphate/
                                         sulfamethazine).
Furst-McNess Co., Freeport, IL 61032..  NADA 140-825..................  558.485
                                        BANMINTH Intermediate Premix..  (010439)
                                        (pyrantel tartrate)...........
Hess & Clark, Inc., 944 Nandino Blvd.,  NADA 140-910..................  524.1580c
 Lexington, KY 40511.                   NFZ Wound Powder..............  (050749)
                                        (nitrofurazone)...............
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

    Therefore, under authority delegated to the Commissioner of Food
and Drugs and redelegated to the Center for Veterinary Medicine, and in
accordance with Sec.  514.116 Notice of withdrawal of approval of
application (21 CFR 514.116), notice is given that approval of NADAs
93-029, 97-981, 100-840, 100-991, 101-079, 101-905, 101-906, 102-824,
108-487, 108-863, 140-820, 140-825, and 140-910, and all supplements
and amendments thereto, is hereby withdrawn, effective April 11, 2011.

    In a final rule published elsewhere in this issue of the Federal
Register, FDA is amending the animal drug regulations to reflect the
withdrawal of approval of these NADAs.

    Dated: March 25, 2011.
Leslie Kux,
Acting Assistant Commissioner for Policy.
[FR Doc. 2011-7558 Filed 3-30-11; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4160-01-P