[Federal Register Volume 80, Number 117 (Thursday, June 18, 2015)]
[Notices]
[Page 34926]
[FR Doc No: 2015-14978]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY

Federal Emergency Management Agency

[Internal Agency Docket No. FEMA-4222-DR; Docket ID FEMA-2015-0002
4222]

 Amendment No. 4 to Notice of a Major Disaster Declaration

AGENCY: Federal Emergency Management Agency, DHS.

ACTION: Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: This notice amends the notice of a major disaster declaration
for the State of Oklahoma (FEMA-4222-DR), dated May 26, 2015, and
related determinations.

DATES: Effective Date: June 4, 2015.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Dean Webster, Office of Response and
Recovery, Federal Emergency Management Agency, 500 C Street SW.,
Washington, DC 20472,<PHONE_NUMBER>.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Notice is hereby given that the incident
period for this disaster is closed effective June 4, 2015.

    The following Catalog of Federal Domestic Assistance Numbers
(CFDA) are to be used for reporting and drawing funds: 97.030,
Community Disaster Loans; 97.031, Cora Brown Fund; 97.032, Crisis
Counseling; 97.033, Disaster Legal Services; 97.034, Disaster
Unemployment Assistance (DUA); 97.046, Fire Management Assistance
Grant; 97.048, Disaster Housing Assistance to Individuals and
Households In Presidentially Declared Disaster Areas; 97.049,
Presidentially Declared Disaster Assistance--Disaster Housing
Operations for Individuals and Households; 97.050, Presidentially
Declared Disaster Assistance to Individuals and Households--Other
Needs; 97.036, Disaster Grants--Public Assistance (Presidentially
Declared Disasters); 97.039, Hazard Mitigation Grant.

W. Craig Fugate,
Administrator, Federal Emergency Management Agency.
[FR Doc. 2015-14978 Filed 6-17-15; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 9111-23-P


[Federal Register: March 11, 2010 (Volume 75, Number 47)]
[Notices]
[Page 11603-11604]
[DOCID:fr11mr10-99]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

[Release No. 34-61647; File No. SR-MSRB-2010-01]

Self-Regulatory Organizations; Municipal Securities Rulemaking
Board; Notice of Filing and Immediate Effectiveness of Proposed Rule
Change Consisting of Revised Interpretive Questions & Answers on the
Application of Rule G-37

March 4, 2010.
    Pursuant to Section 19(b)(1) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934
(``Act''),\1\ and Rule 19b-4 thereunder,\2\ notice is hereby given that
on February 25, 2010, the Municipal Securities Rulemaking Board
(``MSRB''), filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission
(``Commission'' or ``SEC'') the proposed rule change as described in
Items I, II and III below, which Items have been prepared by the MSRB.
The MSRB has designated the proposed rule change as constituting a
stated policy, practice, or interpretation with respect to the meaning,
administration, or enforcement of an existing rule of the self-
regulatory organization pursuant to Section 19(b)(3)(A)(i) of the
Act,\3\ and Rule 19b-4(f)(1) thereunder,\4\ which renders the proposal
effective upon filing with the Commission. The Commission is publishing
this notice to solicit comments on the proposed rule change from
interested persons.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \1\ 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(1).
    \2\ 17 CFR 240.19b-4.
    \3\ 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(3)(A)(i).
    \4\ 17 CFR 240.19b-4(f)(1).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

I. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement of the Terms of Substance
of the Proposed Rule Change

    The MSRB has filed with the Commission a proposed rule change
consisting of revisions to certain of the existing Rule G-37
interpretive Questions & Answers (``Qs&As'') to reflect the new rule
language as contained in recently adopted amendments to Rule G-37 \5\,
concerning disclosure of certain contributions to bond ballot
campaigns. The MSRB requested that the proposed rule change become
effective immediately upon its filing with the SEC.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \5\ Securities Exchange Act Release No. 61381, File No. SR-MSRB-
2009-18 (January 20, 2010).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    The text of the proposed rule change is available on the MSRB's Web
site (http://www.msrb.org/msrb1/sec.asp), at the MSRB's principal
office, and at the Commission's Public Reference Room.

II. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement of the Purpose of, and
Statutory Basis for, the Proposed Rule Change

    In its filing with the Commission, the MSRB included statements
concerning the purpose of and basis for the proposed rule change and
discussed any comments it received on the proposed rule change. The
text of these statements may be examined at the places specified in
Item IV below. The MSRB has prepared summaries, set forth in Sections
A, B, and C below, of the most significant aspects of such statements.

A. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement of the Purpose of, and
Statutory Basis for, the Proposed Rule Change

1. Purpose
    Since the adoption of Rule G-37, on political contributions and
prohibitions on municipal securities business, the MSRB has received
numerous inquiries concerning the application of the rule. In order to
assist the municipal securities industry in understanding and complying
with the provisions of the rule, the MSRB has published a series of
interpretive notices that set forth, in Q & A format, general guidance
on Rule G-37.
    On February 1, 2010, amendments to Rule G-37 became effective
concerning disclosure of certain contributions to bond ballot
campaigns. The proposed rule change revises certain of the Rule G-37
Qs&As to reflect the new rule language as contained in the amendments.
2. Statutory Basis
    The MSRB believes that the proposed rule change is consistent with
Section 15B(b)(2)(C) of the Act,\6\ which provides that the MSRB's
rules shall:
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \6\ 15 U.S.C. 78o-4(b)(2)(C).

    Be designed to prevent fraudulent and manipulative acts and
practices, to promote just and equitable principles of trade, to
foster cooperation and coordination with persons engaged in
regulating, clearing, settling, processing information with respect
to, and facilitating transactions in municipal securities, to remove
impediments to and perfect the mechanism of a free and open market
in municipal securities, and, in general, to protect investors and
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
the public interest.

    The MSRB believes that the proposed rule change is consistent with
the Act in that it provides guidance to brokers, dealers, and municipal
securities dealers in complying with existing MSRB rules.

B. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement on Burden on Competition

    The MSRB does not believe that the proposed rule change will impose
any burden on competition that is not necessary or appropriate in
furtherance of the purposes of the Act, since it would apply equally to
all dealers.

C. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement on Comments on the Proposed
Rule Change Received From Members, Participants or Others

    Written comments were neither solicited nor received.

III. Date of Effectiveness of the Proposed Rule Change and Timing for
Commission Action

    The proposed rule change has become effective pursuant to Section
19(b)(3)(A)(i) of the Act \7\ and Rule 19b-4(f)(1) thereunder,\8\ in
that the proposed rule change constitutes a stated policy, practice, or
interpretation with respect to the meaning, administration, or
enforcement of an existing rule of the MSRB. At any time within 60 days
of the filing of the proposed rule change, the Commission may summarily
abrogate such rule change if it appears to the Commission that such
action is necessary or appropriate in the public interest, for the
protection of investors, or otherwise in furtherance of the purposes of
the Act.\9\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \7\ 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(3)(A)(i).
    \8\ 17 CFR 240.19b-4(f)(1).
    \9\ See Section 19(b)(3)(C) of the Act, 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(3)(C).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

IV. Solicitation of Comments

    Interested persons are invited to submit written data, views, and
arguments concerning the foregoing, including whether the proposed rule
change is consistent with the Act. Comments may be submitted by any of
the following methods:

Electronic Comments

     Use the Commission's Internet comment form (http://
www.sec.gov/rules/sro.shtml); or
     Send an e-mail to<EMAIL_ADDRESS>Please include
File Number SR-MSRB-2010-01 on the subject line.

Paper Comments

     Send paper comments in triplicate to Elizabeth M. Murphy,
Secretary,

Securities and Exchange Commission, 100 F Street, NE., Washington, DC
20549-1090.

All submissions should refer to File Number SR-MSRB-2010-01. This file
number should be included on the subject line if e-mail is used. To
help the Commission process and review your comments more efficiently,
please use only one method. The Commission will post all comments on
the Commission's Internet Web site (http://www.sec.gov/rules/
sro.shtml). Copies of the submission, all subsequent amendments, all
written statements with respect to the proposed rule change that are
filed with the Commission, and all written communications relating to
the proposed rule change between the Commission and any person, other
than those that may be withheld from the public in accordance with the
provisions of 5 U.S.C. 552, will be available for Web site viewing and
printing in the Commission's Public Reference Room, 100 F Street, NE.,
Washington, DC 20549, on official business days between the hours of 10
a.m. and 3 p.m. Copies of such filing also will be available for
inspection and copying at the principal office of the MSRB. All
comments received will be posted without change; the Commission does
not edit personal identifying information from submissions. You should
submit only information that you wish to make available publicly. All
submissions should refer to File Number SR-MSRB-2010-01 and should be
submitted on or before April 1, 2010.

    For the Commission, by the Division of Trading and Markets,
pursuant to delegated authority.\10\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \10\ 17 CFR 200.30-3(a)(12).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

Florence E. Harmon,
Deputy Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2010-5215 Filed 3-10-10; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 8011-01-P


[Federal Register: November 18, 2010 (Volume 75, Number 222)]
[Notices]
[Page 70692-70696]
[DOCID:fr18no10-41]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

 DEPARTMENT OF LABOR

Occupational Safety and Health Administration

[Docket No. OSHA-2010-0013]

TUV Rheinland PTL, LLC; Application for Recognition

AGENCY: Occupational Safety and Health Administration (OSHA), Labor.

ACTION: Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: This notice announces the application of TUV Rheinland PTL,
LLC, for recognition as a Nationally Recognized Testing Laboratory, and
presents the Agency's preliminary finding to grant this recognition.

DATES: Submit information or comments, or a request for an extension of
the time to comment, on or before December 20, 2010. All submissions
must bear a postmark or provide other evidence of the submission date.

ADDRESSES: Submit comments by any of the following methods:
    Electronically: Submit comments electronically at http://
www.regulations.gov, which is the Federal eRulemaking Portal. Follow
the instructions online for making electronic submissions.
    Fax: If submissions, including attachments, are no longer than 10
pages, commenters may fax them to the OSHA Docket Office at (202) 693-
1648.
    Mail, hand delivery, express mail, or messenger or courier service:
Submit one copy of the comments to the OSHA Docket Office, Docket No.
OSHA-2010-0013, U.S. Department of Labor, Room N-2625, 200 Constitution
Avenue, NW., Washington, DC 20210. Deliveries (hand, express mail, and
messenger and courier service) are accepted during the Department of
Labor's and Docket Office's normal business hours, 8:15 a.m.-4:45 p.m.,
e.t.
    Instructions: All submissions must include the Agency name and the
OSHA docket number (i.e., OSHA-2010-0013). OSHA will place all
submissions, including any personal information provided, in the public
docket without revision, and these submissions will be made available
online at http://www.regulations.gov.
    Docket: To read or download submissions or other material in the
docket (e.g., exhibits listed below), go to http://www.regulations.gov
or the OSHA Docket Office at the address above. All documents in the
docket are listed in the http://www.regulations.gov index; however,
some information (e.g., copyrighted material) is not publicly available
to read or download through the Web site. All submissions, including
copyrighted material, are available for inspection and copying at the
OSHA Docket Office.
    Extension of comment period: Submit requests for an extension of
the comment period on or before December 20, 2010 to the Office of
Technical Programs and Coordination Activities, NRTL Program,
Occupational Safety and Health Administration, U.S. Department of
Labor, 200 Constitution Avenue, NW., Room N-3655, Washington, DC 20210,
or by fax to<PHONE_NUMBER>.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: MaryAnn Garrahan, Director, Office of
Technical Programs and Coordination Activities, NRTL Program,
Occupational Safety and Health Administration, U.S. Department of
Labor, 200 Constitution Avenue, NW., Room N-3655, Washington, DC 20210;
telephone:<PHONE_NUMBER>. For information about the Nationally
Recognized Testing Laboratory (NRTL) Program, go to http://
www.osha.gov, and select ``N'' in the site index.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

I. Notice of Application for Recognition

    The Occupational Safety and Health Administration (OSHA) is
providing notice that TUV Rheinland PTL, LLC, (TUVPTL) applied for
recognition as a NRTL. (See Ex. 2--TUVPTL recognition application dated
7/29/2008.) \1\ The application covers testing and certification of the
equipment or materials, and use of the supplemental programs, listed
below.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \1\ A number of documents, or information within documents,
described in this Federal Register notice are the applicant's
internal, detailed procedures or contain other confidential business
or trade-secret information. These documents and information,
designated by an ``NA'' at the end of, or within, the sentence or
paragraph describing them, are not available to the public.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    OSHA recognition of a NRTL signifies that the organization meets
the legal requirements specified in 29 CFR 1910.7. Recognition is an
acknowledgment that the organization can perform independent safety
testing and certification of the specific products covered within its
scope of recognition, and is not a delegation or grant of government
authority. As a result of recognition, employers may use products
approved by the NRTL to meet OSHA standards that require product
testing and certification.
    The Agency processes applications by a NRTL for initial
recognition, or for an expansion or renewal of this recognition,
following requirements in Appendix A to 29 CFR 1910.7. This appendix
requires that the Agency publish two notices in the Federal Register in
processing an application. In the first notice, OSHA announces the
application and provides its preliminary finding, and, in the second
notice, the Agency provides its final decision on the application.
These notices set forth the NRTL's scope of recognition or
modifications of that scope. OSHA maintains an informational Web page
for each NRTL that details its scope of recognition. These pages can be
accessed from OSHA's Web site at http://www.osha.gov/dts/otpca/nrtl/
index.html. Each NRTL's scope of recognition has three elements: (1)
The type of products the NRTL may test, with each type specified by its
applicable test standard; (2) the recognized site(s) that has/have the
technical capability to perform the product testing and certification
activities for test standards within the NRTL's scope; and (3) the
supplemental program(s) that the NRTL may use, each of which allows the
NRTL to rely on other parties to perform activities necessary for
product testing and certification.

II. General Background on the Application

    In its application, TUVPTL lists the current address of the
laboratory facility covered by the application as: TUV Rheinland PTL,
2210 South Roosevelt Street, Tempe, Arizona 85282. According to public
information (http://www.tuvptl.com/tuv-ptl-history.html), TUVPTL states
that it is a testing and certification laboratory for photovoltaic
products, and a leading test organization for photovoltaic technology.
Arizona State University (ASU) established the organization in 1992, as
the Photovoltaic Testing Laboratory (PTL). The TUVPTL Web site states
that the PTL was instrumental in the development of many major
standards concerning photovoltaic products. It was part of ASU until
becoming an affiliate of TUV Rheinland Group.
    TUV Rheinland North America, Inc., (TUVRNA), a currently recognized
NRTL, submitted an application, dated July 29, 2008, to expand its
recognition to include TUVPTL as a recognized site.

(See Ex. 2.) In response to OSHA's request for clarification, TUVRNA
amended its application to provide additional technical details, and
then provided further details in a later update. (See Ex. 3--TUVPTL
amended application dated 5/29/2009.) OSHA's NRTL Program staff
performed an on-site assessment of TUVPTL's facility in January 2010.
Based on this assessment, TUVPTL revised its application to seek
recognition as a NRTL, thus superseding the July 2008 expansion
application by TUVRNA. (See Ex. 4--TUVPTL revised application dated 1/
29/2010.) This revised application incorporated the bulk of the amended
application. The OSHA staff recommended recognition of TUVPTL in their
on-site review report of the assessment. (See Ex. 5--OSHA on-site
review report on TUVPTL.)
    Due to its close affiliation with TUVRNA, the applicant will use
many TUVRNA operational and quality-control procedures for operating as
a NRTL. For example, TUVPTL's NRTL quality-control system will follow
that used by TUVRNA: QP100001--Product Certification Quality Manual
(Ex. 3; see document designated QP100001). Through its application
information (see Ex. 2), TUVPTL represents that it maintains the
experience, expertise, personnel, organization, equipment, and
facilities suitable for accreditation as an OSHA NRTL. It also states
that it meets or will meet the requirements for recognition defined in
29 CFR 1910.7.
    This notice discusses the four requirements for recognition (i.e.,
capability, control procedures, independence, and creditable reports
and complaint handling) below, along with examples that illustrate how
TUVPTL meets each of these requirements. The applicant's summary
addressing OSHA's evaluation criteria (see Detailed Application
Information/Evaluation Criteria (DAI/EC) summary documents, Exs. 3 and
4) reference many, but not all, of the documents or processes described
below in this notice.

Capability

    Section 1910.7(b)(1) states that, for each specified item of
equipment or material requiring listing, labeling, or acceptance by a
NRTL, the NRTL must have the capability (including proper testing
equipment and facilities, trained staff, written testing procedures,
and calibration and quality-control programs) to perform appropriate
testing. The ``Capability'' section of the DAI/EC summary document (NA)
shows that the applicant has security measures and detailed procedures
in place to restrict or control access to its facility, to areas within
its facility, and to confidential information. This section states that
TUVPTL's facility has equipment for monitoring, controlling, and
recording environmental conditions during tests, and for handling test
samples. It also states that the facility has adequate test areas and
energy sources, and procedures for controlling incompatible activities.
OSHA's on-site review report (Ex. 5, p. 2) confirmed this information
concerning the facility, as well as its adequacy. TUVPTL provided a
detailed list of its testing equipment (NA), and OSHA's on-site review
(Ex. 5, p. 2) confirmed that this equipment is in place and adequate
for the scope of testing requested.
    The ``Capability'' section of the DAI/EC summary documents (NA)
indicates that TUVPTL has detailed procedures addressing the
maintenance and calibration of equipment, and the types of records
maintained for, or supporting, many laboratory activities. It also
indicates that TUVPTL has detailed procedures for conducting testing,
review, and evaluation, and for capturing the test data required by the
standard for which it seeks recognition. OSHA's on-site review report
(Ex. 5, p. 2) notes that TUVPTL currently is using these procedures for
testing products for other NRTLs. Further, this section indicates that
TUVPTL has detailed procedures for processing applications and
developing new procedures.
    The revised application (Ex. 4) indicates that TUVPTL has the
necessary procedures to adequately address training or qualifying staff
for particular technical tasks (NA). The revised application and OSHA's
on-site review report (Ex. 5, p. 3) indicate that TUVPTL has the
qualified personnel to perform the proposed scope of testing based on
their education, training, technical knowledge, and experience. The
revised application and OSHA's on-site review report (Ex. 5, p. 3) also
provide evidence that TUVPTL has an adequate quality-control system in
place.

Control Procedures

    Section 1910.7(b)(2) requires that the NRTL provide controls and
services, to the extent necessary, for the particular equipment or
material undergoing listing, labeling, or acceptance. These controls
and services include procedures for identifying the listed or labeled
equipment or materials, inspections of production runs at factories to
assure conformance with test standards, and field inspections to
monitor and assure the proper use of identifying marks or labels.
    The ``Control Programs'' section of the DAI/EC summary document
shows that TUVPTL has the quality-control manual and detailed
procedures to address the steps involved in listing and certifying
products. TUVPTL will use the certification mark of its affiliate,
TUVRNA, which is similar to an arrangement granted by OSHA to two other
affiliated NRTLs. (See 67 FR 3737, January 25, 2002.) However, TUVPTL
personnel must perform the final technical review, make the
certification decision, and authorize the use of the mark. OSHA
proposes to impose a condition to this effect. In addition, the
``Control Programs'' section shows that the applicant has certification
procedures (NA), and that these procedures address authorization of
certifications and audits of factory facilities. The audits apply to
both the initial evaluations and the follow-up inspections of
manufacturers' facilities. This section indicates that procedures also
exist for authorizing the use of the certification mark, and the
actions taken when TUVPTL finds that the manufacturer is deviating from
the certification requirements. Factory inspections will be a new
activity for TUVPTL, and OSHA will need to review the effectiveness of
TUVPTL's inspection program when it is in place. As a result, OSHA is
proposing a condition to ensure that inspections are conducted
properly, and at the frequency set forth in the applicable NRTL Program
policy (see OSHA Instruction CPL 1-0.3, Appendix C, paragraph III.A).

Independence

    Section 1910.7(b)(3) requires that the NRTL be completely
independent of employers that are subject to the testing requirements,
and of any manufacturers or vendors of equipment or materials tested
under the NRTL Program. OSHA has a policy for the independence of NRTLs
that specifies the criteria used for determining whether an
organization meets the above requirement. (See OSHA Instruction CPL 1-
0.3, Appendix C, paragraph V.) This policy contains a non-exhaustive
list of relationships that would cause an organization to fail to meet
the specified criteria.
    The ``Independence'' section of the DAI/EC, and additional
information submitted by TUVPTL (Ex. 4, section titled, ``Information
For Evaluating Compliance'') shows that it has none of these
relationships, or any other relationship that could subject it to undue
influence when testing for product safety. TUVPTL's major owner is a
subsidiary of the parent company of TUVRNA, the NRTL currently

recognized by OSHA. OSHA found no information about TUVRNA's ownership
that would raise an issue of TUVPTL's non-compliance with the NRTL
Program's independence policy.
    There are two other owners, each owning less than 10% of TUVPTL.
One owner is an individual, and OSHA found no information showing any
affiliation with manufacturers, vendors, or major users of products
requiring NRTL approval. The remaining owner is Arizona Technology
Enterprises (AzTE), which has a Web page (http://www.azte.com/page/
about_us/foundation) that states that it ``was established in 2003 as
a limited liability company whose sole member is the ASU Foundation.
The ASU Foundation is an independent non-profit organization that acts
as the principal agent through which gifts are made to benefit [ASU].''
OSHA has found no information to indicate that a manufacturer, vendor,
or major user of products requiring NRTL approval, or the major owners
of these entities, has an ownership interest in the Foundation or ASU,
with ASU being a non-profit, State-operated educational institution.
    According to AzTE's Web page (http://www.azte.com/page/for_
industry), ``AzTE drives the transfer of discoveries and innovation
from ASU's labs to the marketplace through technology partnering and
the creation of new technology-based ventures.'' AzTE acts as the agent
to license these technologies, and takes an equity stake in the
companies that commercialize the technology. AzTE's Web page (http://
www.azte.com/page/portfolio) shows that the vast majority of the
technologies licensed in this manner do not involve the types of
products for which OSHA requires NRTL approval. Companies may use
materials and items developed from a few of these technologies (such as
a sensor, electrode, or wafer) in manufacturing these types of
products, but OSHA found only one product that AzTE licenses that
requires NRTL approval. The entity to which AzTE licensed this product,
a bacterial detection system, was Biosense International (Biosense).
However, the State of Arizona Corporate Commission, which registered
Biosense as a corporation, administratively dissolved Biosense on June
14, 2010, and Biosense remained administratively dissolved as of the
date of this notice. The remainder of AzTE's equity stakes are minor,
thus mitigating the undue influence that such companies could exert on
TUVPTL should these companies sell or use products tested by TUVPTL.
    To address future business ventures by AzTE, OSHA is imposing
conditions on TUVPTL to avoid any situation that could conflict with
OSHA's NRTL independence requirement; OSHA would actively monitor
TUVPTL's compliance with these conditions.
    In summary, the information related to independence demonstrates
that TUVPTL meets the independence requirement. Additionally, OSHA is
imposing conditions on TUVPTL that will enable OSHA to monitor TUVPTL's
compliance with the NRTL independence requirements in the future.

Creditable Reports and Complaint Handling

    Section 1910.7(b)(4) specifies that a NRTL must maintain effective
procedures for producing credible findings and reports that are
objective and free of bias, and for handling complaints and disputes
under a fair and reasonable system. The ``Report and Complaint
Procedures'' section of the DAI/EC summary document (NA) shows that the
applicant has detailed procedures describing the content of the test
reports, and other detailed procedures describing the preparation and
approval of these reports. This section also shows that the applicant
has procedures for recording, analyzing, and processing complaints from
users, manufacturers, and other parties in a fair manner.

Standard Requested for Recognition

    TUVPTL seeks recognition for testing and certifying products to the
following test standard: \2\

    \2\ The designation and title of this test standard was current
at the time OSHA prepared this notice.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    UL 1703 Flat-Plate Photovoltaic Modules and Panels

    OSHA limits recognition of any NRTL for a particular test standard
to equipment or materials (i.e., products) for which OSHA standards
require third-party testing and certification before use in the
workplace. Consequently, if a test standard also covers any product for
which OSHA does not require such testing and certification, an NRTL's
scope of recognition does not include that product.
    The American National Standards Institute (ANSI) may approve the
test standard listed above as an American National Standard. However,
for convenience, we may use the designation of the standards-developing
organization for the standard instead of the ANSI designation. Under
the NRTL Program's policy (see OSHA Instruction CPL 1-0.3, Appendix C,
paragraph XIV), any NRTL recognized for a particular test standard may
use either the proprietary version of the test standard or the ANSI
version of that standard. Contact ANSI to determine whether a test
standard is currently ANSI-approved.

Supplemental Programs

    Should OSHA approve this application for NRTL recognition, it also
will grant approval for TUVPTL to use the following supplemental
program because TUVPTL uses outside parties to perform its equipment
calibration and, therefore, must properly qualify these parties for
this purpose following the criteria in the program:

    Program 9: Acceptance of services other than testing or
evaluation performed by subcontractors or agents

Additional Conditions

    As noted above, a minor owner of TUVPTL, AzTE, may have an equity
stake in companies that use technologies licensed by AzTE. In its
present review, OSHA found that AzTE's ownership interest in these
companies does not currently result in a conflict with OSHA's NRTL
independence requirement; however, the possibility exists that AzTE
could in the future acquire sufficient ownership in one of these
companies to establish such a conflict or potential conflict should any
of these companies sell, or become a major user of, the types of
products that require NRTL approval. Thus, OSHA proposes to impose the
following conditions to avoid conflicts or possible conflicts:
    1. AzTE must comply with the following conditions during the period
it has an ownership interest in TUVPTL or in any company that may
subsequently purchase or replace TUVPTL, and understands that failure
to comply with these conditions may result in OSHA revoking or imposing
limits on TUVPTL's NRTL recognition:
    a. Identify the total number of companies in which it has an
ownership interest and, of this total, the number in which AzTE's
interest in the total ownership of a company is 2% or less, and the
number in which this interest in a company exceeds 2%.
    b. Provide OSHA, annually and as requested, (i) an updated list of
companies in which AzTE's ownership interests in a company exceeds 2%
of the total ownership of the company, and (ii) for each of these
companies, a description of its business purpose. AzTE also must state
whether any of these companies manufactures, distributes, or sells a
type of product shown on OSHA's Web page titled,

``Type of Products Requiring NRTL Approval.''
    c. Provide OSHA access (e.g., when auditing TUVPTL) to the
record(s) or document(s) filed with the applicable legal authority
(e.g., the Secretary of State or other State authority) describing
AzTE's ownership interest in those companies in which OSHA determines
AzTE has an ownership interest exceeding 2% of the total ownership of
the company.
    d. Provide OSHA, annually and as requested, the names and
affiliations of any of its directors who are not directors of the
Arizona State University Foundation.
    2. TUVPTL must comply with the following conditions while AzTE, or
any other entity that manufactures, distributes, or sells a product
tested by TUVPTL or is affiliated with such an entity,\3\ has an
ownership interest in TUVPTL:
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \3\ Any condition that applies to AzTE also would apply to such
an entity.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    a. Not test or certify any product under the NRTL Program made or
sold by a company owned in excess of 2% by AzTE. In addition, before
testing or certifying any product for an NRTL client applicant, TUVPTL
will follow detailed procedures, reviewed and found acceptable by OSHA,
to determine that such a company did not make or sell the product.
    b. Cease certifications related to the NRTL Program if the
following criteria are met: (i) AzTE has more than a 10% ownership
interest in a company; (ii) OSHA determines that such a company or one
of its subsidiaries, affiliates, or significant owners, makes or sells
a type of product for which OSHA requires NRTL approval (i.e., one
currently shown in OSHA's Web page titled, ``Type of Products Requiring
NRTL Approval''); and (iii) OSHA determines that the risk of actual or
potential undue influence resulting from this ownership is not minor
(see condition 2c below). If these criteria are met, and AzTE does not,
within 60 days of OSHA's request, take steps to reduce such ownership
interests below 10% within 60 days, OSHA will initiate the process to
revoke TUVPTL's NRTL recognition.
    c. For purposes of condition 2b above, TUVPTL must provide
or make available, at OSHA's request, information required by OSHA to
determine whether a risk of actual or potential undue influence is not
minor. This information may include, but is not limited to, a financial
statement(s) or the annual report of the company owned by AzTE, and, if
not included in the document(s) provided, a list of the types of
products sold or made by the company, and the overall percentage of the
company's total revenue derived from selling these products. If TUVPTL
cannot or does not provide or make available this information at OSHA's
request, OSHA will be unable to determine whether the risk is minor,
and, thus, will commence the process to revoke TUVPTL's NRTL
recognition.
    d. To provide OSHA, either annually or upon request, TUVPTL's
overall client list, noting those clients that are NRTL clients and,
for each such client, whether it is a company in which AzTE has more
than a 10% ownership interest. Each list shall be in an electronic
format, and shall include the information specified by OSHA. For
example, this information may include the client's name and address;
the product name(s) and model number(s); the fees paid during the last
calendar year by the client for testing and certifying its product(s);
and the percentage of TUVPTL's total revenue derived during the last
calendar year from testing and certifying this/these product(s).
    Additionally, as described above, while TUVPTL has testing, review,
and evaluation procedures, OSHA could not review how TUVPTL fully
implemented them because TUVPTL was not using them fully for testing
and certifying products under the NRTL Program. In addition, as also
described above, while TUVPTL has factory-inspection procedures, it
currently does not conduct regular factory inspections. In this regard,
TUVPTL only recently developed some components of these factory-
inspection procedures. Therefore, OSHA also must review the
effectiveness of TUVPTL's factory-inspection program should OSHA grant
NRTL recognition to TUVPTL, and do so within a reasonable period after
granting recognition. Consequently, OSHA proposes to recognize TUVPTL
conditionally, i.e., subject to a later determination of the
effectiveness of these procedures. In addition, because TUVPTL will use
the mark of its affiliate, OSHA is imposing a condition to ensure that
TUVPTL personnel perform the critical steps involved in certification.
Therefore, the following conditions also would apply should OSHA
recognize TUVPTL under the NRTL Program:
    3. Within 30 days of certifying its first products under the NRTL
Program, TUVPTL will notify the OSHA NRTL Program Director of this
activity so that OSHA may schedule its first audit of TUVPTL. At this
first audit of TUVPTL, TUVPTL must demonstrate that it properly
conducted testing, review, evaluation, and factory inspections, and,
for inspections, did so at the frequency set forth in the applicable
NRTL Program policy.
    4. Only TUVPTL personnel may perform the final technical review,
make the final certification decision, and authorize use of the mark
for those products TUVPTL certifies under the NRTL Program.
    OSHA would include all of the conditions proposed above in the
final notice should OSHA recognize TUVPTL as an NRTL. These conditions
apply solely to TUVPTL's operations as an NRTL, and solely to those
products that it certifies for purposes of enabling employers to meet
OSHA product-approval requirements. These conditions would be in
addition to all other conditions that OSHA normally imposes in its
recognition of an organization as an NRTL.
    Imposing these conditions is consistent with OSHA's past
recognition of several organizations as NRTLs that met the basic
recognition requirements, but needed to further refine or implement
their procedures (for example, see 63 FR 68306, 12/10/1998, and 65 FR
26637, 05/08/2000). Given the applicant's current activities in testing
and certification, OSHA is confident that TUVPTL will conform to the
requirements for recognition noted above.

Preliminary Finding on the Application

    TUVPTL submitted an acceptable application for recognition as an
NRTL. OSHA's review of the application file, and the results of the on-
site review, indicate that TUVPTL can meet the requirements prescribed
by 29 CFR 1910.7 for recognition to use the test standard listed above.
This preliminary finding does not constitute an interim or temporary
approval of the application. TUVPTL corrected the discrepancies noted
by OSHA during the on-site review, and the on-site review report
describes these corrections (Ex. 5).
    Following examination of the application file and the on-site
review report, the NRTL Program staff concluded that OSHA can grant the
applicant recognition as an NRTL for its Tempe, Arizona facility,
subject to the conditions described above. The staff, therefore,
recommended preliminarily that the Assistant Secretary approve the
application.
    OSHA welcomes public comment as to whether TUVPTL meets the
requirements of 29 CFR 1910.7 for recognition as an NRTL. Comments
should consist of pertinent written documents and exhibits. Commenters
needing more time to comment must

submit a request in writing, stating the reasons for the request. OSHA
must receive the written request for an extension by the due date for
comments. OSHA will limit any extension to 30 days unless the requester
justifies a longer period. OSHA may deny a request for an extension if
it is not adequately justified. To obtain or review copies of the
publicly available information in TUVPTL's application and other
pertinent documents (including exhibits), as well as all submitted
comments, contact the Docket Office, Room N-2625, Occupational Safety
and Health Administration, U.S. Department of Labor, at the above
address; these materials also are available online at http://
www.regulations.gov under Docket No. OSHA-2010-0013.
    The NRTL Program staff will review all comments to the docket
submitted in a timely manner, and, after addressing the issues raised
by these comments, will recommend whether to grant NRTL recognition to
TUVPTL. The Assistant Secretary will make the final decision on
granting NRTL recognition, and, in making this decision, may undertake
other proceedings prescribed in Appendix A to 29 CFR 1910.7. OSHA will
publish a public notice of this final decision in the Federal Register.

Authority and Signature

    David Michaels, Ph.D., MPH, Assistant Secretary of Labor for
Occupational Safety and Health, 200 Constitution Avenue, NW.,
Washington, DC 20210, directed the preparation of this notice.
Accordingly, the Agency is issuing this notice pursuant to Sections
6(b) and 8(g) of the Occupational Safety and Health Act of 1970 (29
U.S.C. 655 and 657), Secretary of Labor's Order No. 4-2010 (75 FR
55355), and 29 CFR part 1911.

    Signed at Washington, DC on this 15th day of November 2010.
David Michaels,
Assistant Secretary of Labor for Occupational Safety and Health.
[FR Doc. 2010-29127 Filed 11-17-10; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4510-26-P


Page 1 of 3 June 2, 2003 Syngenta submission of ecological effects data for the June 17 20, 2003 FIFRA SAP meeting: Potential Developmental Effects of Atrazine on Amphibians MRID STUDY TITLE N/ A Endocrine System Responses of Amphibians to Atrazine: Updated Assessment of an Expert Panel ( Syngenta Study No. 1725 02)

45867701 Smith, E., L DuPreez and K. Solomon. 2003. Field exposure of Xenopus laevis to atrazine and other triazines in South Africa: exposure characterization and assessment of laryngeal and gonadal responses. The Institute of Environmental & Human Health, Texas Tech University, Lubbock, Texas 79490 ( USA) and School of Environmental Sciences and Development, Potchefstroom University for CHE, Private Bag X6001, Potchefstroom 2520 ( South Africa). Sponsor: Syngenta Crop Protection,

Inc., Laboratory Study ID ECORISK Number SA  01B 45867702 Jones, P. D., M. B. Murphy, M. Hecker, J. P. Giesy. 2003. Tissue Pesticide Residues and Histology of the Larynx and Gonads in Native Green Frogs ( Rana clamitans) Collected from Agricultural Areas in Michigan: Hormone Analysis. Aquatic Toxicology Laboratory, Michigan State University, 218C National Food Safety and Toxicology Center, E. Lansing, MI. Sponsor: Syngenta Crop Protection,

Inc. Laboratory Study ID: ECORISK Number MSU 02.

45867703 Hecker, M., K. K. Coady, D. L. Villeneuve, M. B. Murphy, P. D. Jones and J. P. Giesy. 2003. A Pilot Study of Response of Larval Rana clamitans to Atrazine Exposure: Assessment of Metamorphosis and Gonadal and Laryngeal Morphology and Selected Hormones and Enzyme Activities. Aquatic Toxicology Laboratory, Michigan State University, National Food Safety and Toxicology Center, E. Lansing, MI. Sponsor: Syngenta Crop Protection, Inc., Laboratory Study ID ECORISK Number MSU 03. Page 2 of 3 45867704 Hecker, M., K. K. Coady, D. L. Villeneuve, M. B. Murphy, P. D. Jones and J. P. Giesy. 2003.

Response of Xenopus laevis to Atrazine Exposure: Assessment of the Mechanism of Action of Atrazine. Aquatic Toxicology Laboratory, Michigan State University, National Food Safety and Toxicology Center, E. Lansing, MI. Sponsor: Syngenta Crop Protection, Inc., Laboratory Study ID ECORISK Number MSU 04.

45867705 Crabtree, C.; E. E. Smith; J. A. Carr. 2003. Histology of the gonads and analysis of hormone levels in the native bull frog ( Rana catesbiena) collected from agricultural areas in southern Iowa: pilot project. The Institute of Environmental and Human Health, Texas Technical University, Lubbock,

Texas. Sponsor: Syngenta Crop Protection, Inc. Laboratory Identification Number ECORISK Number TTU  02.

45867706 Sepulveda, M. S. and T. S. Gross. 2003. Characterization of Atrazine Exposures and Potential Effects in Florida Ecosystems Dominated by Sugarcane Agriculture: A Reconnaissance Survey of Amphibians in South Florida for the Assessment of Potential Atrazine Effects. Department of Physiological Sciences, University of Florida, Caribbean Science Center, Gainesville, Florida.

Sponsor: Syngenta Crop Protection, Inc. Study ID: ECORISK Number UFL 02.

45867707 Goleman, W. L. and J. A. Carr. 2003. Response of larval Xenopus laevis to Atrazine Exposure:

Assessment of Metamorphosis and Gonadal and Laryngeal Morphology. The Institute of Environmental and Human Health, Texas Tech University, Texas Tech University Health Sciences Center, Lubbock, Texas. Sponsor: Syngenta Crop Protection, Inc., Laboratory Study ID ECORISK Number TTU 01.

45867708 Villeneuve, D. L., K. Coady, M. Hecker, M. B. Murphy, P. D. Jones and J. P. Giesy. 2003. Methods development for the study of mechanism of action of atrazine in adult and metamophosing Xenopus laevis and Rana clamitans: aromatase induction. Aquatic Toxicology Laboratory, Michigan State University, National Food Safety and Toxicology Center, E. Lansing, MI. Sponsor: Syngenta Crop Protection, Inc., Laboratory Study ID ECORISK Number MSU 01. Page 3 of 3 45867709 Smith, E. E., L. DuPreez, and K. Solomon. 2003. Field exposure of Xenopus laevis to atrazine and other triazines in South Africa: feasibility study for site characterization and assessment of laryngeal and gonadal responses. The Institute of Environmental and Human Health, Texas Tech University,

Lubbock, Texas ( USA) and School of Environmental Sciences and Development, Potchefstroom University for CHE, Potchefstroom, South Africa. Sponsor: Syngenta Crop Protection, Inc.,

Laboratory Study ID: ECORISK Number SA 01A 45867710 Smith, E. E., L. DuPreez, and K. Solomon. 2003. Gonadal and laryngeal responses to field exposure of Xenopus laevis to atrazine in areas of corn production in South Africa. The Institute of Environmental and Human Health, Texas Tech University, Lubbock, TX and School of Environmental Sciences and Development, Potchefstroom University for CHE, Potchefstroom, South Africa. Sponsor: Syngenta Crop Protection, Inc., Laboratory Study ID: ECORISK Number SA 01C.

45867501 Giesy, J. P., M. Hecker, and P. D. Jones. 2003. South African Analytical Support B Hormone and Aromatase Analysis ( SA 01C). Aquatic Toxicology Laboratory, Michigan State University,

National Food Safety and Toxicology Center, E. Lansing, MI. Sponsor: Syngenta Crop Protection,

Inc., Laboratory Study ID ECORISK Number MSU 07 45867711 DuPreez, L. H., A. M. Jooste and K. R. Solomon. 2003. Exposure of Xenopus laevis larvae to different concentrations of atrazine in semi natural microcosms. School of Environmental Sciences and Development, Zoology Department, Potchefstroom University fo CHE, Potchefstroom 2520,

South Africa. Sponsor: Syngenta Crop Protection, Inc., Laboratory Study ID ECORISK Number SA

01 D.


[Federal Register: July 10, 2006 (Volume 71, Number 131)]
[Notices]
[Page 38875-38876]
[DOCID:fr10jy06-50]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission

[Project No. 2503-091]

Duke Power Company, LLC; Notice of Availability of Environmental
Assessment

June 30, 2006.
    In accordance with the National Environmental Policy Act of 1969
and the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission's (Commission)
regulations, 18 CFR part 380 (Order No. 486, 52 FR 47897), the Office
of Energy Projects has reviewed an application for non-project use of
project lands and

waters at the Keowee-Toxaway Hydroelectric Project (FERC No. 2503), and
has prepared an Environmental Assessment (EA) for the proposed non-
project use. The non-project use of project lands and waters is located
on Lake Keowee in Pickens County, South Carolina.
    In the application, Duke Power requests Commission authorization to
lease 63 acres of project land to Warpath Development, Inc. to
construct and maintain a public recreation area at the Warpath Access
Area. The public recreation area would include water related facilities
and services, outdoor recreation opportunities, lodging, and dining.
The EA contains Commission staff's analysis of the probable
environmental impacts of the proposal and concludes that approving the
licensee's application would not constitute a major federal action
significantly affecting the quality of the human environment.
    The EA is attached to a Commission order titled ``Order Approving
Non-Project Use of Project Lands and Waters,'' which was issued June
30, 2006, and is available for review and reproduction at the
Commission's Public Reference Room, located at 888 First Street, NE.,
Room 2A, Washington, DC 20426. The EA may also be viewed on the
Commission's Web site at http://www.ferc.gov using the ``elibrary''

link. Enter the project number (prefaced by P-) and excluding the last
three digits, in the docket number field to access the document. For
assistance, contact FERC Online Support at<EMAIL_ADDRESS>or toll-free at<PHONE_NUMBER>, or for TTY, contact<PHONE_NUMBER>.

Magalie R. Salas,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. E6-10696 Filed 7-7-06; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 6717-01-P


[Federal Register Volume 84, Number 200 (Wednesday, October 16, 2019)]
[Notices]
[Pages 55324-55325]
[FR Doc No: 2019-22455]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY

Federal Emergency Management Agency

[Docket ID FEMA-2019-0002; Internal Agency Docket No. FEMA-B-1965]

Proposed Flood Hazard Determinations

AGENCY: Federal Emergency Management Agency, DHS.

ACTION: Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: Comments are requested on proposed flood hazard
determinations, which may include additions or modifications of any
Base Flood Elevation (BFE), base flood depth, Special Flood Hazard Area
(SFHA) boundary or zone designation, or regulatory floodway on the
Flood Insurance Rate Maps (FIRMs), and where applicable, in the
supporting Flood Insurance Study (FIS) reports for the communities
listed in the table below. The purpose of this notice is to seek
general information and comment regarding the preliminary FIRM, and
where applicable, the FIS report that the Federal Emergency Management
Agency (FEMA) has provided to the affected communities. The FIRM and
FIS report are the basis of the floodplain management measures that the
community is required either to adopt or to show evidence of having in
effect in order to qualify or remain qualified for participation in the
National Flood Insurance Program (NFIP). In addition, the FIRM and FIS
report, once effective, will be used by insurance agents and others to
calculate appropriate flood insurance premium rates for new buildings
and the contents of those buildings.

DATES: Comments are to be submitted on or before January 14, 2020.

ADDRESSES: The Preliminary FIRM, and where applicable, the FIS report
for each community are available for inspection at both the online
location https://www.fema.gov/preliminaryfloodhazarddata and the
respective Community Map Repository address listed in the tables below.
Additionally, the current effective FIRM and FIS report for each
community are accessible online through the FEMA Map Service Center at
https://msc.fema.gov for comparison.
    You may submit comments, identified by Docket No. FEMA-B-1965, to
Rick Sacbibit, Chief, Engineering Services Branch, Federal Insurance
and Mitigation Administration, FEMA, 400 C Street SW, Washington, DC
20472,<PHONE_NUMBER>, or (email<EMAIL_ADDRESS>
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Rick Sacbibit, Chief, Engineering
Services Branch, Federal Insurance and Mitigation Administration, FEMA,
400 C Street SW, Washington, DC 20472,<PHONE_NUMBER>, or (email)
<EMAIL_ADDRESS>or visit the FEMA Map Information
eXchange (FMIX) online at https://www.floodmaps.fema.gov/fhm/fmx_main.html.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: FEMA proposes to make flood hazard
determinations for each community listed below, in accordance with
section 110 of the Flood Disaster Protection Act of 1973, 42 U.S.C.
4104, and 44 CFR 67.4(a).
    These proposed flood hazard determinations, together with the
floodplain management criteria required by 44 CFR 60.3, are the minimum
that are required. They should not be construed to mean that the
community must change any existing ordinances that are more stringent
in their floodplain management requirements. The community may at any
time enact stricter requirements of its own or pursuant to policies
established by other Federal, State, or regional entities. These flood
hazard determinations are

used to meet the floodplain management requirements of the NFIP and are
used to calculate the appropriate flood insurance premium rates for new
buildings built after the FIRM and FIS report become effective.
    The communities affected by the flood hazard determinations are
provided in the tables below. Any request for reconsideration of the
revised flood hazard information shown on the Preliminary FIRM and FIS
report that satisfies the data requirements outlined in 44 CFR 67.6(b)
is considered an appeal. Comments unrelated to the flood hazard
determinations also will be considered before the FIRM and FIS report
become effective.
    Use of a Scientific Resolution Panel (SRP) is available to
communities in support of the appeal resolution process. SRPs are
independent panels of experts in hydrology, hydraulics, and other
pertinent sciences established to review conflicting scientific and
technical data and provide recommendations for resolution. Use of the
SRP only may be exercised after FEMA and local communities have been
engaged in a collaborative consultation process for at least 60 days
without a mutually acceptable resolution of an appeal. Additional
information regarding the SRP process can be found online at https://www.floodsrp.org/pdfs/srp_overview.pdf.
    The watersheds and/or communities affected are listed in the tables
below. The Preliminary FIRM, and where applicable, FIS report for each
community are available for inspection at both the online location
https://www.fema.gov/preliminaryfloodhazarddata and the respective
Community Map Repository address listed in the tables. For communities
with multiple ongoing Preliminary studies, the studies can be
identified by the unique project number and Preliminary FIRM date
listed in the tables. Additionally, the current effective FIRM and FIS
report for each community are accessible online through the FEMA Map
Service Center at https://msc.fema.gov for comparison.

(Catalog of Federal Domestic Assistance No. 97.022, ``Flood
Insurance.'')

Michael M. Grimm,
Assistant Administrator for Risk Management, Department of Homeland
Security, Federal Emergency Management Agency.

------------------------------------------------------------------------
                                             Community map repository
               Community                             address
------------------------------------------------------------------------
            Red Lake County, Minnesota and Incorporated Areas
          Project: 17-05-1534S Preliminary Date: March 29, 2019
------------------------------------------------------------------------
City of Brooks.........................  Brooks Community Federal Credit
                                          Union, 200 Main Street,
                                          Brooks, MN 56715.
City of Oklee..........................  Oklee Municipal Center, 301
                                          Main Street, Oklee, MN 56742.
City of Plummer........................  City Hall, 170 Central Avenue
                                          East, Plummer, MN 56748.
City of Red Lake Falls.................  City Hall, 108 2nd Street
                                          Southwest, Red Lake Falls, MN
                                          56750.
Red Lake Band of Chippewa Tribe........  Red Lake Nation Government
                                          Center, 15484 Migizi Drive,
                                          Red Lake, MN 56671.
Unincorporated Areas of Red Lake County  Red Lake County Courthouse, 124
                                          Langevin Avenue, Red Lake
                                          Falls, MN 56750.
------------------------------------------------------------------------
               Lorain County, Ohio and Incorporated Areas
          Project: 13-05-1799S Preliminary Date: July 12, 2019
------------------------------------------------------------------------
City of Avon Lake......................  City Hall, Engineering and
                                          Public Works Department, 150
                                          Avon Beldon Road, Avon Lake,
                                          OH 44012.
City of Lorain.........................  City Hall, Engineering
                                          Department, 200 West Erie
                                          Avenue, 4th Floor, Lorain, OH
                                          44052.
------------------------------------------------------------------------

[FR Doc. 2019-22455 Filed 10-15-19; 8:45 am]
 BILLING CODE 9110-12-P