[Federal Register Volume 78, Number 212 (Friday, November 1, 2013)]
[Notices]
[Pages 65740-65741]
[FR Doc No: 2013-26073]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

[Release No. 34-70763; File No. 4-546]

Joint Industry Plan; Notice of Filing and Immediate Effectiveness
of Amendment to the Options Order Protection and Locked/Crossed Market
Plan To Add Topaz Exchange, LLC as a Participant

October 28, 2013.
    Pursuant to Section 11A(a)(3) of the Securities Exchange Act of
1934 (``Act'') \1\ and Rule 608 thereunder,\2\ notice is hereby given
that on August 7, 2013, Topaz Exchange, LLC (``Topaz'' or ``Exchange'')
filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (``Commission'') an
amendment to the Options Order Protection and Locked/Crossed Market
Plan (``Plan'').\3\ The amendment added Topaz as a Participant \4\ to
the Plan. The Commission is publishing this notice to solicit comments
on the amendment from interested persons.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \1\ 15 U.S.C. 78k-1(a)(3).
    \2\ 17 CFR 242.608.
    \3\ On July 30, 2009, the Commission approved a national market
system plan relating to Options Order Protection and Locked/Crossed
Markets proposed by Chicago Board Options Exchange, Incorporated
(``CBOE''), International Securities Exchange, LLC (``ISE''), The
NASDAQ Stock Market LLC (``Nasdaq''), NASDAQ OMX BX, Inc. (``BOX''),
NASDAQ OMX PHLX, Inc. (``Phlx''), NYSE Amex, LLC (``NYSE Amex''),
and NYSE Arca, Inc. (``NYSE Arca''). See Securities Exchange Act
Release No. 60405 (July 30, 2009), 74 FR 39362 (August 6, 2009). See
also Securities Exchange Act Release Nos. 61546 (February 19, 2010),
75 FR 8762 (February 25, 2010) (adding BATS Exchange, Inc.
(``BATS'') as a Participant); 63119 (October 15, 2010), 75 FR 65536
(October 25, 2010) (adding C2 Options Exchange, Incorporated
(``C2'') as a Participant); 66969 (May 11, 2012), 77 FR 29396 (May
17, 2012) (adding BOX Options Exchange LLC (``BOX Options'') as a
Participant). Miami International Securities Exchange, LLC
(``MIAX'') joined the Plan on December 5, 2012.
    \4\ The term ``Participant'' is defined as an Eligible Exchange
whose participation in the Plan has become effective pursuant to
Section 3(c) of the Plan.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

I. Description and Purpose of the Amendment

    The current Participants in the Linkage Plan are BOX Options, C2,
CBOE, BATS, ISE, Nasdaq, BOX, Phlx, NYSE Amex,\5\ NYSE Arca, and MIAX.
The amendment to the Plan added Topaz as a Participant in the Plan.
Topaz has submitted a signed copy of the Plan to the Commission in
accordance with the procedures set forth in the Plan regarding new
Participants. Section 3(c) of the Plan provides for the entry of new
Participants to the Plan. Specifically an Eligible Exchange \6\ may
become a Participant in the Plan by: (i) Executing a copy of the Plan,
as then in effect; (ii) providing each current Participant with a copy
of such executed Plan; (iii) effecting an amendment to the Plan, as
specified in Sections 3(c) and 4(b) of the Plan.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \5\ NYSE Amex was recently renamed NYSE MKT LLC. See Securities
Exchange Act Release No. 67037 (May 21, 2012), 77 FR 31415 (May 25,
2012) (SR-NYSEAmex-2012-32).
    \6\ Section 2(6) of the Plan defines an ``Eligible Exchange'' as
a national securities exchange registered with the Commission
pursuant to Section 6(a) of the Act, 15 U.S.C. 78f(a), that: (a) Is
a ``Participant Exchange'' in the Options Clearing Corporation
(``OCC'') (as defined in OCC By-laws, Section VII); (b) is a party
to the Options Price Reporting Authority (``OPRA'') Plan (as defined
in the OPRA Plan, Section 1); and (c) if the national securities
exchange chooses not to become party to this Plan, is a participant
in another plan approved by the Commission providing for comparable
Trade-Through and Locked and Crossed Market protection. Topaz has
represented that it has met the requirements for being considered an
Eligible Exchange. See letter from Michael Simon, Secretary, Topaz
Exchange, LLC to Elizabeth Murphy, Secretary, Commission, dated
August 1, 2013.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    Section 4(b) of the Plan puts forth the process by which an
Eligible Exchange may effect an amendment to the Plan. Specifically, an
Eligible Exchange must: (a) Execute a copy of the Plan with the only
change being the addition of the new participant's name in Section 3(a)
of the Plan; and (b) submit the executed Plan to the Commission. The
Plan then provides that such an amendment will be effective when the
amendment is approved by the Commission or otherwise becomes effective
pursuant to Section 11A of the Act and Rule 608 thereunder.

II. Effectiveness of the Linkage Plan Amendment

    The foregoing Plan amendment has become effective pursuant to Rule
608(b)(3)(iii) of the Act \7\ because it involves solely technical or
ministerial matters. At any time within sixty days of the filing of
this amendment, the Commission may summarily abrogate the amendment and
require that it be refiled pursuant to paragraph (b)(1) of Rule 608,\8\
if it appears to the Commission that such action is necessary or
appropriate in the public interest, for the protection of investors or
the maintenance of fair and orderly markets, to remove impediments to,
and perfect the mechanisms of, a national market system or otherwise in
furtherance of the purposes of the Act.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \7\ 17 CFR 242.608(b)(3)(iii).
    \8\ 17 CFR 242.608(b)(1).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

III. Solicitation of Comments

    Interested persons are invited to submit written data, views and
arguments concerning the foregoing,

including whether the amendment is consistent with the Act. Comments
may be submitted by any of the following methods:

Electronic Comments

     Use the Commission's Internet comment form (http://www.sec.gov/rules/sro.shtml); or
     Send an email to<EMAIL_ADDRESS>Please include
File Number 4-546 on the subject line.

Paper Comments

     Send paper comments in triplicate to Elizabeth M. Murphy,
Secretary, Securities and Exchange Commission, 100 F Street NE.,
Washington, DC 20549-1090.

All submissions should refer to File Number 4-546. This file number
should be included on the subject line if email is used. To help the
Commission process and review your comments more efficiently, please
use only one method. The Commission will post all comments on the
Commission's Internet Web site (http://www.sec.gov/rules/sro.shtml).
Copies of the submission, all subsequent amendments, all written
statements with respect to the amendment that are filed with the
Commission, and all written communications relating to the amendment
between the Commission and any person, other than those that may be
withheld from the public in accordance with the provisions of 5 U.S.C.
552, will be available for Web site viewing and printing in the
Commission's Public Reference Room, 100 F Street NE., Washington, DC
20549, on official business days between the hours of 10:00 a.m. and
3:00 p.m. Copies of such filing also will be available for inspection
and copying at the principal office of Topaz. All comments received
will be posted without change; the Commission does not edit personal
identifying information from submissions. You should submit only
information that you wish to make available publicly. All submissions
should refer to File Number 4-546 and should be submitted on or before
November 22, 2013.

    By the Commission.
Kevin M. O'Neill,
Deputy Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2013-26073 Filed 10-31-13; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 8011-01-P


Reading and Initial
Reporting
$0
$0
$0 $0
Monitoring
$80,865
$0
$0 $80,865
Reporting of Results
$69,428
$0
$0 $69,428
Non-Labor Costs (Laboratory Analysis and Shipping)
$2,954,765
$0
$0
$2,954,765
Subtotal – Very Large
Systems
$3,105,058
$0
$0
$3,105,058
ALL SYSTEMS
Total Labor for
All Systems
$573,525
$0
$0
$573,525
Total Non-Labor for
All Systems
$8,590,560
$0
$0
$8,590,560
Total Labor and Non-
Labor for All Systems
$9,164,085
$0
$0
$9,164,085
1
Labor costs were estimated by system size and water source by multiplying estimated burden (as described in
Section 6(a)(i)) for each activity by estimated system labor rates (see Exhibit 6 in Section 6(a)(i)). Non-labor costs
were also estimated by system size and water source, and by multiplying “number of systems” by “number of
sampling points” by “number of required samples” by “lab and shipping fees”.

Information Collection Request for UCMR 2
November 2009
33
Exhibit 8b: Per System (Respondent) and Per Respondent UCMR Costs (2010-2012)
(corresponds with Exhibit B-1b)
Total over 2010-2012
Annual Average over 2010-2012
Burden / Cost
Small
Systems
Large
Systems
Very
Large
Systems
Small
Systems
Large
Systems
Very
Large
Systems
PER RESPONDENT:
Labor Cost $132
$341
$1,108
$44
$114
$369
Non-Labor Cost
$0
$5,241
$21,780
$0
$1,747
$7,260
Burden (labor hours)  4.7 11.5 31.1
1.6
3.8
10.4
PER RESPONSE:
Number of Responses per
Respondent
2.7 3.1 3.6
0.9 1.0 1.2
Labor Cost per Response  $50 $111
$308
$17  $37 $103
Non-Labor Cost per Response
$0
$1,711
$6,055
$0
$570
$2,018
Burden (labor hours) per
Response
1.8 3.8 8.7
0.6 1.3 2.9
6(b)
Estimating the Burden and Cost to States
Since UCMR is a direct implementation rule, individual State costs will largely depend
on specifications in their PA. EPA assumed that States will incur only labor costs, because no
capital investments are expected for this second cycle of the program. Because States will be
involved in a variety of UCMR implementation and oversight activities but have few defined
responses, burden estimates are based on yearly activities. Thus, for “per response” estimates,
States are assumed to have an average of 1.0 response per year during each year of the UCMR 2
cycle; 2007-2011.
EPA used the “2001 ASDWA Drinking Water Program Resource Needs Self
Assessment” to estimate State burden and cost for the implementation and oversight of UCMR 2.
This assessment tool (or model) was developed by ASDWA to assist States in estimating the
resources needed to implement their Statewide drinking water programs (in both full-time
equivalent staff (FTEs) and dollars). In 2000, the United States General Accounting Office had
used a previous version of this model to estimate nationwide drinking water program needs for
Congress. The tool was later updated and improved based on comments from 27 States. To make
the model easier to use, ASDWA established suggested salary and benefit ranges (i.e., default
values), resource needs for the various NPDWRs, and other key variables.
EPA used the defaults values (or average values within a default range) that were
provided in the model to estimate the national burden and cost for State UCMR 2 activities.
Defaults included:
•
one FTE is equivalent to 1,800 hours per year; overhead and holidays, sick leave,
etc. are accounted for through default loading of base salaries;
•
professional and support staff salaries vary for different sized States (very small,
small, medium, large, very large); and

Information Collection Request for UCMR 2
November 2009
34
•
suggested ranges of FTEs for the implementation of the Phase II/V, Arsenic, and
UCMR programs (i.e., the relevant subsection of the model).
Understandably, the model had bundled the State resource needs for Phase II/V, Arsenic,
and UCMR, because of the inherent overlap and similarities in the programs. However, because
these programs were bundled, EPA needed to “extract” the UCMR costs from the aggregated
costs. Based on best professional estimates, and consultations with staff from three State
drinking water programs (California, Connecticut, and Nebraska) regarding the relative
magnitude of the UCMR program, EPA assumed that:
•
during the first UCMR 2 ICR period (2007-2009), preparatory and organizational
activities included State Monitoring Plans finalized, system notifications sent, and
Assessment Monitoring and Screening Survey monitoring being conducted; thus UCMR
2 was estimated to represent 3 percent of the bundled program resource needs (though
these are not relevant to the current ICR estimations for 2010-2012); and
•
during the last two years of the five-year cycle (2010 and 2011), there are fewer
organizational activities; thus, UCMR 2 is estimated to represent 1 percent of the bundled
program resource needs (applicable to 2 of the 3 ICR years, 2010-2012).
EPA ran the model for each of the State size categories that were based on the number of
systems for which States have drinking water program oversight responsibilities. To estimate
nationwide costs, the size-specific “per State” estimates that are generated by the model were
then multiplied by the number of States in each size category, as shown in Exhibit 9.
EPA further refined the model estimates by taking the level of State participation under
UCMR 1 into consideration. EPA reviewed five key areas of State participation under UCMR 1,
including: review and revision to the State Monitoring Plans; assisting EPA with update to
information for large systems; two separate sets of system notifications; and compliance
assistance. Based on levels of involvement in each of these UCMR activities, States typically
participated in between 40 and 100 percent of their optional UCMR activities. However, some
States chose not to participate at all. Burden estimates generated from the resource model were
multiplied by this “percent participation in UCMR 1” to approximate State costs at expected
participation levels under UCMR 2.
Exhibit 9: Number of States in Each Size Category (State
Resource Model Assumptions)
Size Category
Number of States
Very Small
10
Small 11
Medium
23
Large 10
Very Large
2
Total
56

Information Collection Request for UCMR 2
November 2009
35
EPA estimates that the average annual burden over 3 years (2010-2012) for 56 States to
implement UCMR will be 3,555 hours (or 63.5 hours per State per year), with an average annual
cost (labor only) of $195,921 (or $3,499 per State per year). See Exhibits 10a and 10b for a
summary of estimated State burdens and costs (analogous five-year information for 2007-2011
provided in Exhibits B-2a and B-2b, in Appendix B).
Exhibit 10a: Yearly Cost and Burden to States for Implementation of UCMR (2010-2012)
(corresponds with Exhibit B-2a)
1
Cost/Burden
2010
2011
2012
Total
Annual Average


[Federal Register Volume 77, Number 123 (Tuesday, June 26, 2012)]
[Proposed Rules]
[Pages 38024-38030]
[FR Doc No: 2012-15597]

=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION

National Highway Traffic Safety Administration

49 CFR Part 541

[Docket No. NHTSA-2012-0072]

Preliminary Theft Data; Motor Vehicle Theft Prevention Standard

AGENCY: National Highway Traffic Safety Administration (NHTSA),
Department of Transportation (DOT).

ACTION: Publication of preliminary theft data; request for comments.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: This document requests comments on data about passenger motor
vehicle thefts that occurred in

calendar year (CY) 2010 including theft rates for existing passenger
motor vehicle lines manufactured in model year (MY) 2010. The
preliminary theft data indicate that the vehicle theft rate for CY/MY
2010 vehicles (1.17 thefts per thousand vehicles) decreased by 12.03
percent from the theft rate for CY/MY 2009 vehicles (1.33 thefts per
thousand vehicles).
    Publication of these data fulfills NHTSA's statutory obligation to
periodically obtain accurate and timely theft data, and publish the
information for review and comment.

DATES: Comments must be submitted on or before August 27, 2012.

ADDRESSES: You may submit comments [identified by Docket No. NHTSA-
2012-0072] by any of the following methods:
     Federal eRulemaking Portal: Go to http://www.regulations.gov. Follow the online instructions for submitting
comments.
     Mail: Docket Management Facility: U.S. Department of
Transportation, 1200 New Jersey Avenue SE., West Building Ground Floor,
Room W12-140, Washington, DC 20590-0001.
     Hand Delivery or Courier: West Building Ground Floor, Room
W12-140, 1200 New Jersey Avenue SE., between 9 a.m. and 5 p.m. ET,
Monday through Friday, except Federal holidays.
     Fax:<PHONE_NUMBER>.
    Instructions: For detailed instructions on submitting comments and
additional information on the rulemaking process, see the Public
Participation heading of the Supplementary Information section of this
document. Note that all comments received will be posted without change
to http://www.regulations.gov, including any personal information
provided. Please see the Privacy Act heading below.
    Privacy Act: Anyone is able to search the electronic form of all
comments received into any of our dockets by the name of the individual
submitting the comment (or signing the comment, if submitted on behalf
of an association, business, labor union, etc.). You may review DOT's
complete Privacy Act Statement in the Federal Register published on
April 11, 2000 (65 FR 19477-78) or you may visit http://DocketsInfo.dot.gov.
    Docket: For access to the docket to read background documents or
comments received, go to http://www.regulations.gov or the street
address listed above. Follow the online instructions for accessing the
dockets.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Ms. Deborah Mazyck, Office of
International Policy, Fuel Economy and Consumer Programs, NHTSA, 1200
New Jersey Avenue SE., Washington, DC 20590. Ms. Mazyck's telephone
number is<PHONE_NUMBER>. Her fax number is<PHONE_NUMBER>.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: NHTSA administers a program for reducing
motor vehicle theft. The central feature of this program is the Federal
Motor Vehicle Theft Prevention Standard, 49 CFR Part 541. The standard
specifies performance requirements for inscribing or affixing vehicle
identification numbers (VINs) onto certain major original equipment and
replacement parts of high-theft lines of passenger motor vehicles.
    The agency is required by 49 U.S.C. 33104(b)(4) to periodically
obtain, from the most reliable source, accurate and timely theft data
and publish the data for review and comment. To fulfill the Sec.
33104(b)(4) mandate, this document reports the preliminary theft data
for CY 2010, the most recent calendar year for which data are
available.
    In calculating the 2010 theft rates, NHTSA followed the same
procedures it has used since publication of the 1983/1984 theft rate
data (50 FR 46669, November 12, 1985). The 2010 theft rate for each
vehicle line was calculated by dividing the number of reported thefts
of MY 2010 vehicles of that line stolen during calendar year 2010 by
the total number of vehicles in that line manufactured for MY 2010, as
reported to the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA). As in all
previous reports, NHTSA's data were based on information provided to
NHTSA by the National Crime Information Center (NCIC) of the Federal
Bureau of Investigation. The NCIC is a government system that receives
vehicle theft information from approximately 23,000 criminal justice
agencies and other law enforcement authorities throughout the United
States. The NCIC data also include reported thefts of self-insured and
uninsured vehicles, not all of which are reported to other data
sources.
    The preliminary 2010 theft data show a decrease in the vehicle
theft rate when compared to the theft rate experienced in CY/MY 2009
(For 2009 theft data, see 76 FR 65610, October 24, 2011). The
preliminary theft rate for MY 2010 passenger vehicles stolen in
calendar year 2010 decreased to 1.17 thefts per thousand vehicles
produced, a decrease of 12.03 percent from the rate of 1.33 thefts per
thousand vehicles experienced by MY vehicles in CY 2009. For MY 2010
vehicles, out of a total of 225 vehicle lines, three lines had a theft
rate higher than 3.5826 per thousand vehicles, the established median
theft rate for MYs 1990/1991 (See 59 FR 12400, March 16, 1994). Of the
three vehicle lines with a theft rate higher than 3.5826, three are
passenger car lines, none are multipurpose passenger vehicle lines, and
none are light-duty truck lines.
    The agency believes that the theft rate reduction is a result of
several factors, including vehicle parts marking; the increased use of
standard antitheft devices and other advances in electronic technology
(i.e., immobilizers) and theft prevention methods; increased and
improved prosecution efforts by law enforcement organizations; and
increased public awareness which may have contributed to the overall
reduction in vehicle thefts. The preliminary MY 2010 theft rate
reduction is consistent with the general decreasing trend of theft
rates over the past 18 years as indicated by Figure 1.

[GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] TP26JN12.001

Theft Rate per Thousand Vehicles Produced

    In Table I, NHTSA has tentatively ranked each of the MY 2010
vehicle lines in descending order of theft rate. Public comment is
sought on the accuracy of the data, including the data for the
production volumes of individual vehicle lines.
    Comments must not exceed 15 pages in length (49 CFR 553.21).
Attachments may be appended to these submissions without regard to the
15-page limit. This limitation is intended to encourage commenters to
detail their primary arguments in a concise fashion.
    If a commenter wishes to submit certain information under a claim
of confidentiality, three copies of the complete submission, including
purportedly confidential business information, should be submitted to
the Chief Counsel, NHTSA, at the street address given above, and two
copies from which the purportedly confidential information has been
deleted should be submitted to the dockets. A request for
confidentiality should be accompanied by a cover letter setting forth
the information specified in the agency's confidential business
information regulation. 49 CFR part 512.
    All comments received before the close of business on the comment
closing date indicated above for this document will be considered, and
will be available for examination in the docket at the above address
both before and after that date. To the extent possible, comments filed
after the closing date will also be considered. Comments on this
document will be available for inspection in the docket. NHTSA will
continue to file relevant information as it becomes available for
inspection in the docket after the closing date, and it is recommended
that interested persons continue to examine the docket for new
material.
    Those persons desiring to be notified upon receipt of their
comments in the rules docket should enclose a self-addressed, stamped
postcard in the envelope with their comments. Upon receiving the
comments, the docket supervisor will return the postcard by mail.
    Privacy Act: Anyone is able to search the electronic form of all
comments received into any of our dockets by the name of the individual
submitting the comment (or signing the comment, if submitted on behalf
of an association, business, labor union, etc.). You may review DOT's
complete Privacy Act Statement in the Federal Register published on
April 11, 2000 (Volume 65, Number 70; Pages 19477-78) or you may visit
http://DocketsInfo.dot.gov.

   Preliminary Report of Theft Rates for Model Year 2010 Passenger Motor Vehicles Stolen in Calendar Year 2010
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
                                                                                2010 Theft rate
                                                      Make/model                   Production      (per 1,000
                                   Manufacturer         (line)       Thefts 2010    (Mfr's)         vehicles
                                                                                2010         produced)
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
 1............................  CHRYSLER.........  DODGE CHARGER...          532       88,032             6.0433
 2............................  GENERAL MOTORS...  PONTIAC G6......          111       25,586             4.3383
 3............................  GENERAL MOTORS...  CHEVROLET IMPALA          579      150,391             3.8500
 4............................  CHRYSLER.........  300.............          185       52,261             3.5399
 5............................  NISSAN...........  INFINITI FX35...           30        9,385             3.1966
 6............................  MITSUBISHI.......  GALANT..........           38       12,053             3.1527

 7............................  CHRYSLER.........  SEBRING.........          130       43,022             3.0217
 8............................  TOYOTA...........  LEXUS SC........            1          335             2.9851
 9............................  CHRYSLER.........  DODGE AVENGER...          197       67,604             2.9140
 10...........................  KIA..............  RIO.............           55       18,975             2.8986
 11...........................  NISSAN...........  INFINITI M35/M45           12        4,287             2.7992
 12...........................  GENERAL MOTORS...  CHEVROLET HHR...          178       64,733             2.7498
 13...........................  FORD MOTOR CO....  LINCOLN TOWN CAR           27        9,937             2.7171
 14...........................  MERCEDES-BENZ....  CL-CLASS........            3        1,124             2.6690
 15...........................  BMW..............  7...............           15        5,702             2.6307
 16...........................  HYUNDAI..........  SONATA..........          195       77,219             2.5253
 17...........................  HYUNDAI..........  ACCENT..........          139       55,245             2.5161
 18...........................  KIA..............  OPTIMA..........           60       25,135             2.3871
 19...........................  GENERAL MOTORS...  CADILLAC DTS....           36       15,744             2.2866
 20...........................  FORD MOTOR CO....  MUSTANG.........          162       72,346             2.2392
 21...........................  GENERAL MOTORS...  CHEVROLET COBALT          260      116,273             2.2361
 22...........................  VOLVO............  C70.............            5        2,238             2.2341
 23...........................  CHRYSLER.........  DODGE CALIBER...          103       47,199             2.1822
 24...........................  TOYOTA...........  CAMRY/SOLARA....          691      317,754             2.1746
 25...........................  GENERAL MOTORS...  CHEVROLET MALIBU          381      183,777             2.0732
 26...........................  GENERAL MOTORS...  CHEVROLET AVEO..           65       31,692             2.0510
 27...........................  NISSAN...........  VERSA...........          162       79,164             2.0464
 28...........................  CHRYSLER.........  DODGE CHALLENGER          106       51,812             2.0459
 29...........................  HONDA............  PILOT...........           42       22,528             1.8643
 30...........................  BMW..............  6...............            5        2,808             1.7806
 31...........................  CHRYSLER.........  SEBRING                    16        9,219             1.7355
                                                    CONVERTIBLE.
 32...........................  MITSUBISHI.......  ENDEAVOR........            8        4,674             1.7116
 33...........................  VOLVO............  S40.............           12        7,306             1.6425
 34...........................  CHRYSLER.........  JEEP COMPASS....           30       18,549             1.6173
 35...........................  GENERAL MOTORS...  CHEVROLET CAMARO          190      117,961             1.6107
 36...........................  FORD MOTOR CO....  FOCUS...........          279      176,089             1.5844
 37...........................  AUDI.............  AUDI S4/S5......           11        7,068             1.5563
 38...........................  NISSAN...........  PATHFINDER......           16       10,308             1.5522
 39...........................  GENERAL MOTORS...  CADILLAC CTS....           61       40,045             1.5233
 40...........................  NISSAN...........  ALTIMA..........          340      224,551             1.5141
 41...........................  GENERAL MOTORS...  PONTIAC VIBE....           21       14,075             1.4920
 42...........................  FORD MOTOR CO....  MERCURY GRAND              41       27,956             1.4666
                                                    MARQUIS.
 43...........................  SUZUKI...........  SX4.............           19       13,405             1.4174
 44...........................  KIA..............  FORTE...........          137       98,010             1.3978
 45...........................  FORD MOTOR CO....  TAURUS..........           87       62,367             1.3950
 46...........................  GENERAL MOTORS...  SATURN VUE......            4        2,904             1.3774
 47...........................  TOYOTA...........  4RUNNER.........           18       13,345             1.3488
 48...........................  NISSAN...........  MAXIMA..........           89       66,639             1.3356
 49...........................  NISSAN...........  XTERRA..........           31       23,420             1.3237
 50...........................  MAZDA............  5...............           26       20,150             1.2903
 51...........................  TOYOTA...........  COROLLA.........          615      478,294             1.2858
 52...........................  HYUNDAI..........  ELANTRA.........          194      151,343             1.2819
 53...........................  PORSCHE..........  PANAMERA........            7        5,531             1.2656
 54...........................  NISSAN...........  SENTRA..........          116       92,736             1.2509
 55...........................  SUBARU...........  B9 TRIBECA......            3        2,412             1.2438
 56...........................  FORD MOTOR CO....  FUSION..........          341      280,461             1.2159
 57...........................  FORD MOTOR CO....  MERCURY MILAN...           47       38,824             1.2106
 58...........................  TOYOTA...........  YARIS...........           74       63,285             1.1693
 59...........................  MAZDA............  6...............           53       45,410             1.1671
 60...........................  NISSAN...........  INFINITI G37....           49       42,113             1.1635
 61...........................  TOYOTA...........  SCION XB........           24       20,718             1.1584
 62...........................  TOYOTA...........  MATRIX..........           31       26,950             1.1503
 63...........................  VOLKSWAGEN.......  JETTA/GLI.......          142      123,543             1.1494
 64...........................  VOLKSWAGEN.......  CC..............           33       29,078             1.1349
 65...........................  MERCEDES-BENZ....  S-CLASS.........           17       15,555             1.0929
 66...........................  MERCEDES-BENZ....  GLK-CLASS.......           38       35,364             1.0745
 67...........................  VOLKSWAGEN.......  NEW BEETLE......           18       16,829             1.0696
 68...........................  TOYOTA...........  SCION TC........           21       19,786             1.0614
 69...........................  HONDA............  ACURA 3.5 RL....            3        2,859             1.0493
 70...........................  KIA..............  SPORTAGE........           13       12,465             1.0429
 71...........................  GENERAL MOTORS...  CHEVROLET                  12       11,615             1.0331
                                                    CORVETTE.
 72...........................  MAZDA............  3...............          164      158,778             1.0329
 73...........................  MERCEDES-BENZ....  C-CLASS.........           58       56,579             1.0251
 74...........................  MASERATI.........  GRANTURISMO.....            1          989             1.0111
 75...........................  GENERAL MOTORS...  CADILLAC STS....            3        3,010             0.9967

 76...........................  GENERAL MOTORS...  BUICK LACROSSE/            55       55,836             0.9850
                                                    ALLURE.
 77...........................  FORD MOTOR CO....  FLEX............           22       22,451             0.9799
 78...........................  MERCEDES-BENZ....  E-CLASS.........           61       63,473             0.9610
 79...........................  FORD MOTOR CO....  LINCOLN MKS.....           14       14,730             0.9504
 80...........................  CHRYSLER.........  DODGE JOURNEY...           70       74,562             0.9388
 81...........................  GENERAL MOTORS...  BUICK LUCERNE...           19       20,529             0.9255
 82...........................  JAGUAR LAND ROVER  XK/XKR..........            2        2,198             0.9099
 83...........................  CHRYSLER.........  JEEP LIBERTY....           44       48,487             0.9075
 84...........................  KIA..............  SOUL............           68       75,847             0.8965
 85...........................  BMW..............  3...............           42       47,715             0.8802
 86...........................  FORD MOTOR CO....  EDGE............          105      119,546             0.8783
 87...........................  CHRYSLER.........  DODGE NITRO.....           17       19,432             0.8748
 88...........................  AUDI.............  AUDI A3.........            4        4,587             0.8720
 89...........................  HYUNDAI..........  GENESIS.........           25       29,056             0.8604
 90...........................  BMW..............  Z4/M............            1        1,165             0.8584
 91...........................  JAGUAR LAND ROVER  XF..............            7        8,206             0.8530
 92...........................  HONDA............  ACCORD CROSSTOUR           29       34,114             0.8501
 93...........................  HONDA............  CIVIC...........          217      259,907             0.8349
 94...........................  AUDI.............  AUDI TT.........            1        1,201             0.8326
 95...........................  TOYOTA...........  FJ CRUISER......           16       19,395             0.8250
 96...........................  FORD MOTOR CO....  LINCOLN MKZ.....           23       27,963             0.8225
 97...........................  SUBARU...........  IMPREZA.........           31       38,000             0.8158
 98...........................  TOYOTA...........  LEXUS LS........           11       13,636             0.8067
 99...........................  BENTLEY MOTORS...  CONTINENTAL.....            1        1,249             0.8006
100...........................  TOYOTA...........  SIENNA VAN......           43       54,895             0.7833
101...........................  NISSAN...........  CUBE............           15       19,411             0.7728
102...........................  HONDA............  ACURA ZDX.......            3        3,994             0.7511
103...........................  FORD MOTOR CO....  ESCAPE..........          146      200,970             0.7265
104...........................  GENERAL MOTORS...  GMC CANYON                  6        8,394             0.7148
                                                    PICKUP.
105...........................  NISSAN...........  GT-R............            1        1,420             0.7042
106...........................  HONDA............  ACCORD..........          198      281,286             0.7039
107...........................  HYUNDAI..........  SANTA FE........           39       55,423             0.7037
108...........................  MITSUBISHI.......  LANCER..........           21       29,952             0.7011
109...........................  KIA..............  SEDONA VAN......           11       15,716             0.6999
110...........................  TOYOTA...........  TACOMA PICKUP...           77      111,599             0.6900
111...........................  TOYOTA...........  HIGHLANDER......           58       84,152             0.6892
112...........................  AUDI.............  AUDI A4/A5......           26       38,497             0.6754
113...........................  MERCEDES-BENZ....  SLK-CLASS.......            1        1,505             0.6645
114...........................  NISSAN...........  370Z............            7       10,913             0.6414
115...........................  GENERAL MOTORS...  CADILLAC SRX....           31       48,740             0.6360
116...........................  TOYOTA...........  SCION XD........           10       15,884             0.6296
117...........................  CHRYSLER.........  JEEP PATRIOT....           25       40,670             0.6147
118...........................  HONDA............  ACURA MDX.......           21       34,613             0.6067
119...........................  AUDI.............  AUDI A6.........            4        6,777             0.5902
120...........................  SUZUKI...........  KIZASHI.........            4        6,807             0.5876
121...........................  KIA..............  RONDO...........            1        1,713             0.5838
122...........................  NISSAN...........  FRONTIER PICKUP.           26       44,888             0.5792
123...........................  FORD MOTOR CO....  LINCOLN MKX.....           12       21,164             0.5670
124...........................  FORD MOTOR CO....  CROWN VICTORIA..            1        1,809             0.5528
125...........................  TOYOTA...........  VENZA...........           27       49,445             0.5461
126...........................  VOLKSWAGEN.......  TIGUAN..........            9       17,505             0.5141
127...........................  BMW..............  1...............            3        5,890             0.5093
128...........................  HONDA............  INSIGHT.........           22       43,523             0.5055
129...........................  TOYOTA...........  LEXUS IS........           21       41,696             0.5036
130...........................  NISSAN...........  ROGUE...........           44       89,165             0.4935
131...........................  TOYOTA...........  RAV4............           89      180,634             0.4927
132...........................  HONDA............  ELEMENT.........            8       16,560             0.4831
133...........................  HONDA............  ACURA TSX.......           23       47,770             0.4815
134...........................  TOYOTA...........  AVALON..........            7       14,551             0.4811
135...........................  HYUNDAI..........  TUCSON..........           11       22,950             0.4793
136...........................  GENERAL MOTORS...  CHEVROLET                  12       25,073             0.4786
                                                    COLORADO PICKUP.
137...........................  VOLVO............  V50.............            1        2,148             0.4655
138...........................  FORD MOTOR CO....  MERCURY MARINER.           14       30,142             0.4645
139...........................  SUBARU...........  LEGACY..........           16       34,726             0.4607
140...........................  CHRYSLER.........  JEEP WRANGLER...           45       98,149             0.4585
141...........................  BMW..............  MINI COOPER.....           18       40,706             0.4422
142...........................  VOLKSWAGEN.......  GOLF/RABBIT/GTI.           11       24,911             0.4416
143...........................  TOYOTA...........  LEXUS GS........            3        6,801             0.4411
144...........................  CHRYSLER.........  PT CRUISER......            5       11,358             0.4402

145...........................  MAZDA............  MX-5 MIATA......            3        7,090             0.4231
146...........................  TOYOTA...........  LEXUS ES........           23       54,389             0.4229
147...........................  HONDA............  ACURA 3.2 TL....           15       37,466             0.4004
148...........................  FORD MOTOR CO....  RANGER PICKUP...           22       58,434             0.3765
149...........................  NISSAN...........  MURANO..........           22       58,921             0.3734
150...........................  AUDI.............  AUDI Q5.........            7       18,853             0.3713
151...........................  SUBARU...........  OUTBACK.........           25       71,253             0.3509
152...........................  VOLVO............  S80.............            3        8,805             0.3407
153...........................  BMW..............  5...............           12       35,988             0.3334
154...........................  SUBARU...........  FORESTER........           37      111,861             0.3308
155...........................  TOYOTA...........  LEXUS RX........           49      152,431             0.3215
156...........................  HONDA............  CR-V............           64      200,327             0.3195
157...........................  TOYOTA...........  PRIUS...........           78      250,553             0.3113
158...........................  VOLVO............  XC90............            3        9,846             0.3047
159...........................  VOLKSWAGEN.......  PASSAT..........            4       13,204             0.3029
160...........................  GENERAL MOTORS...  GMC TERRAIN.....           13       48,605             0.2675
161...........................  SUZUKI...........  VITARA/GRAND                2        7,498             0.2667
                                                    VITARA.
162...........................  HONDA............  ODYSSEY VAN.....           30      113,418             0.2645
163...........................  MITSUBISHI.......  OUTLANDER.......            4       15,936             0.2510
164...........................  PORSCHE..........  911.............            1        4,030             0.2481
165...........................  TOYOTA...........  LEXUS HS........            4       18,091             0.2211
166...........................  FORD MOTOR CO....  TRANSIT CONNECT             8       36,886             0.2169
                                                    VAN.
167...........................  HONDA............  ACURA RDX.......            3       14,117             0.2125
168...........................  NISSAN...........  INFINITI EX35...            2        9,536             0.2097
169...........................  GENERAL MOTORS...  CHEVROLET                  29      139,654             0.2077
                                                    EQUINOX.
170...........................  SAAB.............  9-3.............            1        5,090             0.1965
171...........................  VOLVO............  XC60............            3       17,202             0.1744
172...........................  VOLKSWAGEN.......  EOS.............            1        5,762             0.1736
173...........................  MAZDA............  CX-7............            7       40,443             0.1731
174...........................  HONDA............  FIT.............           12       69,465             0.1727
175...........................  BMW..............  X3..............            1        6,566             0.1523
176...........................  MAZDA............  CX-9............            1       15,464             0.0647
177...........................  ASTON MARTIN.....  DB9.............            0           68             0.0000
178...........................  ASTON MARTIN.....  DBS.............            0          169             0.0000
179...........................  ASTON MARTIN.....  RAPIDE..........            0          135             0.0000
180...........................  ASTON MARTIN.....  VANTAGE.........            0          229             0.0000
181...........................  AUDI.............  AUDI A8.........            0          649             0.0000
182...........................  AUDI.............  AUDI R8.........            0          546             0.0000
183...........................  AUDI.............  AUDI S6.........            0          140             0.0000
184...........................  BENTLEY MOTORS...  AZURE...........            0           38             0.0000
185...........................  BENTLEY MOTORS...  BROOKLANDS......            0            2             0.0000
186...........................  BMW..............  M3..............            0        1,869             0.0000
187...........................  BMW..............  M5..............            0          386             0.0000
188...........................  BMW..............  M6..............            0          523             0.0000
189...........................  BUGATTI..........  VEYRON..........            0            8             0.0000
190...........................  CHRYSLER.........  DODGE VIPER.....            0          384             0.0000
191...........................  FERRARI..........  458.............            0          474             0.0000
192...........................  FERRARI..........  599.............            0          153             0.0000
193...........................  FERRARI..........  612 SCAGLIETTI..            0           26             0.0000
194...........................  FERRARI..........  CALIFORNIA......            0        1,127             0.0000
195...........................  GENERAL MOTORS...  CADILLAC FUNERAL            0          529             0.0000
                                                    COACH/HEARSE.
196...........................  GENERAL MOTORS...  CADILLAC                    0          272             0.0000
                                                    LIMOUSINE.
197...........................  GENERAL MOTORS...  PONTIAC G5......            0            3             0.0000
198...........................  GENERAL MOTORS...  SATURN AURA.....            0           20             0.0000
199...........................  HYUNDAI..........  AZERA...........            0        1,121             0.0000
200...........................  HYUNDAI..........  VERACRUZ........            0        8,344             0.0000
201...........................  JAGUAR LAND ROVER  LAND ROVER LR2..            0        4,430             0.0000
202...........................  JAGUAR LAND ROVER  XJ..............            0           68             0.0000
203...........................  LAMBORGHINI......  GALLARDO........            0          190             0.0000
204...........................  LAMBORGHINI......  MURCIELAGO......            0           59             0.0000
205...........................  LOTUS............  ELISE...........            0          354             0.0000
206...........................  MASERATI.........  QUATTROPORTE....            0          394             0.0000
207...........................  MAZDA............  RX-8............            0        1,217             0.0000
208...........................  MAZDA............  TRIBUTE.........            0        4,180             0.0000
209...........................  MERCEDES-BENZ....  CLS-CLASS.......            0        1,352             0.0000
210...........................  MERCEDES-BENZ....  MAYBACH 57......            0            1             0.0000
211...........................  MERCEDES-BENZ....  SMART FORTWO....            0        3,255             0.0000
212...........................  MITSUBISHI.......  ECLIPSE.........            0          793             0.0000
213...........................  NISSAN...........  INFINITI FX50...            0          460             0.0000

214...........................  PORSCHE..........  BOXSTER.........            0        1,421             0.0000
215...........................  PORSCHE..........  CAYMAN..........            0          955             0.0000
216...........................  ROLLS ROYCE......  GHOST...........            0          604             0.0000
217...........................  ROLLS ROYCE......  PHANTOM.........            0          281             0.0000
218...........................  ROUSH PERFORMANCE  RPP MUSTANG.....            0          766             0.0000
219...........................  SAAB.............  9-5.............            0          644             0.0000
220...........................  SPYKER...........  C8..............            0            5             0.0000
221...........................  SUZUKI...........  EQUATOR PICKUP..            0        1,230             0.0000
222...........................  TESLA............  ROADSTER........            0          278             0.0000
223...........................  VOLVO............  C30.............            0        1,536             0.0000
224...........................  VOLVO............  V70.............            0        1,496             0.0000
225...........................  VOLVO............  XC70............            0        6,379             0.0000
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

    Authority: 49 U.S.C. 33101, 33102 and 33104; delegation of
authority at 49 CFR 1.50.

    Issued on: June 7, 2012.
Christopher J. Bonanti,
Associate Administrator for Rulemaking.
[FR Doc. 2012-15597 Filed 6-25-12; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910-59-P


[Federal Register: February 24, 2009 (Volume 74, Number 35)]
[Notices]
[Page 8255-8256]
[DOCID:fr24fe09-66]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY

[EPA-HQ-OAR-2003-0078; FRL-8776-2]

Agency Information Collection Activities; Submission to OMB for
Review and Approval; Comment Request; Landfill Methane Outreach Program
(Renewal), EPA ICR Number 1849.05, OMB Control Number 2060-0446

AGENCY: Environmental Protection Agency (EPA).

ACTION: Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: In compliance with the Paperwork Reduction Act (44 U.S.C. 3501
et seq.), this document announces that an Information Collection
Request (ICR) has been forwarded to the Office of Management and Budget
(OMB) for review and approval. This is a request to reinstate a
previously approved ICR. The ICR that is abstracted below describes the
nature of the collection and the estimated burden and cost.

DATES: Additional comments may be submitted on or before March 26,
2009.

ADDRESSES: Submit your comments, referencing docket ID number EPA-HQ-
OAR-2003-0078 to (1) EPA online using http://www.regulations.gov (our
preferred method), by e-mail to<EMAIL_ADDRESS>or by mail to:
EPA Docket Center (EPA/DC), Environmental Protection Agency, Air and
Radiation Docket, mail code 2282T, 1200 Pennsylvania Avenue, NW.,
Washington, DC 20460; and (2) OMB at: Office of Information and
Regulatory Affairs, Office of Management and Budget (OMB), Attention:
Desk Officer for EPA, 725 17th Street, NW., Washington, DC 20503.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Victoria Ludwig, Climate Change
Division, Office of Atmospheric Programs, 6207J, Environmental
Protection Agency, 1200 Pennsylvania Avenue, NW., Washington, DC 20460;
telephone number:<PHONE_NUMBER>; fax number:<PHONE_NUMBER>; e-mail
address<EMAIL_ADDRESS>
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: EPA has submitted the following ICR to OMB
for review and approval according to the procedures prescribed in 5 CFR
1320.12. On June 3, 2008 (73 FR 31681), EPA sought comments on this ICR
pursuant to 5 CFR 1320.8(d). EPA received no comments. Any additional
comments on this ICR should be submitted to EPA and OMB within 30 days
of this notice.
    EPA has established a public docket for this ICR under docket ID
number EPA-HQ-OAR-2003-0078, which is available for public viewing
online at http://www.regulations.gov, and in person viewing at the Air
and Radiation Docket in the EPA Docket Center (EPA/DC), EPA West, Room
3334, 1301 Constitution Avenue, NW., Washington, DC. The EPA Docket
Center Public Reading Room is open from 8:30 a.m. to 4:30 p.m. Monday
through Friday, excluding legal holidays. The telephone number for the
Reading Room is<PHONE_NUMBER> and the telephone number for the Air and
Radiation Docket is<PHONE_NUMBER>.
    Use EPA's electronic docket and comment system at http://
www.regulations.gov to submit or view public comments, access the index
listing of the contents of the docket, and access those documents in
the docket that are available electronically. Once in the system,
select ``docket search,'' then key in the docket ID number identified
above. Please note that EPA's policy is that public comments, whether
submitted electronically or in paper, will be made available for public
viewing at http://www.regulations.gov as EPA receives them and without
change, unless the comment contains

copyrighted material, confidential business information (CBI), or other
information whose public disclosure is restricted by statute. For
further information about the electronic docket, go to http://
www.regulations.gov.
    Title: Landfill Methane Outreach Program (Renewal).
    ICR Numbers: EPA ICR Number 1849.05, OMB Control Number 2060-0446.
    ICR Status: This ICR was discontinued on July 31, 2007. EPA is
reinstating the previously approved ICR. An Agency may not conduct or
sponsor, and a person is not required to respond to, a collection of
information, unless it displays a currently valid OMB control number.
The OMB control numbers for EPA's regulations in Title 40 of the CFR,
after appearing in the Federal Register when approved, are listed in 40
CFR part 9, and are displayed either by publication in the Federal
Register or by other appropriate means, such as on the related
collection instrument or form, if applicable. The display of OMB
control numbers in certain EPA regulations is consolidated in 40 CFR
part 9.
    Abstract: The Landfill Methane Outreach Program (LMOP), created by
EPA as part of the Climate Change Action Plan, is a voluntary program
designed to encourage and facilitate the development of environmentally
and economically sound landfill gas (LFG) energy projects across the
United States in order to reduce methane emissions from landfills. LMOP
does this by educating local governments and communities about the
benefits of LFG recovery and use; building partnerships between state
agencies, industry, energy service providers, local communities, and
other stakeholders interested in developing this valuable resource in
their community; and providing tools to evaluate LFG energy (LFGE)
potential. LMOP signs voluntary Memoranda of Understanding (MOU) with
these organizations to enlist their support in promoting cost-effective
LFG utilization. The information collection includes completion and
submission of the MOU, and annual completion and submission of
information forms that include basic information on landfill gas energy
projects with which the organizations are involved. The information
collection also includes a one-time effort to update the LMOP Landfill
and Landfill Gas Energy Project Database. The information collection is
to be utilized to maintain up-to-date data and information about LMOP
Partners and landfill gas energy projects with which they are involved.
The data will also be used by the public to assess LFGE project
development opportunities in the United States. In addition, the
information collection will assist LMOP in evaluating the reduction of
methane emissions from landfills. Responses to the information
collection are voluntary.
    Burden Statement: The annual public reporting and recordkeeping
burden for this collection of information is estimated to average 5
hours per response. Burden means the total time, effort, or financial
resources expended by persons to generate, maintain, retain, and
disclose or provide information to or for a Federal agency. This
includes the time needed to review instructions; develop, acquire,
install, and utilize technology and systems for the purposes of
collecting, validating, and verifying information, processing and
maintaining information, and disclosing and providing information;
adjust the existing ways to comply with any previously applicable
instructions and requirements which have subsequently changed; train
personnel to be able to respond to a collection of information; search
data sources; complete and review the collection of information; and
transmit or otherwise disclose the information.
    Respondents/Affected Entities: Landfill owners and operators (both
public and private), landfill gas energy project developers,
manufacturers and suppliers of landfill gas energy equipment,
utilities, industries using landfill gas energy, state agencies
involved in energy, air pollution, economic development and solid waste
management, and non-profits involved in the solid waste management,
public works, local government and renewable energy sectors.
    Estimated Number of Respondents: 1,279.
    Frequency of Response: Initially, occasionally, annually.
    Estimated Total Annual Hour Burden: 5,887.
    Estimated Total Annual Cost: $344,827, which includes $1,342 in
annualized O&M costs.
    Changes in the Estimates: There is an increase of 4,354 hours in
the total estimated annual respondent burden compared with that
identified in the ICR previously approved by OMB. This increase
reflects a large growth in the number of LMOP Partners since the last
renewal. Since the last ICR renewal, LMOP no longer collects
information annually from Energy, State, and non-developer Industry
Partners, the information forms have been simplified into pre-populated
spreadsheets, and other collection efficiencies have been implemented
such as the option to submit MOUs electronically. As a result of these
changes, the average number of hours per Partner has decreased, but the
total hourly burden for LMOP Partners still increased because of an
increase in the number of Partners. For perspective on the magnitude of
Partner growth, there were 365 Partners at the end of 2003 when the ICR
was last renewed, whereas there were 675 Partners as of July 2007. This
indicates an 85% increase in Partners since the last renewal. The
remainder of the increase in total hourly burden comes from a planned
initiative to collect critical landfill data from 1,000 additional
landfill owners and operators. These data are necessary in order to
better respond to public data requests and evaluate the potential of
future LFGE opportunities. This type of data collection has not
occurred during LMOP's history. This change is the result of a program
change.

    Dated: February 18, 2009.
John Moses,
Acting Director, Collection Strategies Division.
[FR Doc. E9-3912 Filed 2-23-09; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 6560-50-P


[Federal Register Volume 84, Number 172 (Thursday, September 5, 2019)]
[Notices]
[Page 46775]
[FR Doc No: 2019-19139]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION

Federal Aviation Administration

[Summary Notice No. 2019-41]

Petition for Exemption; Summary of Petition Received; A-Cam
Aerials, LLC

AGENCY: Federal Aviation Administration (FAA), Department of
Transportation (DOT).

ACTION: Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: This notice contains a summary of a petition seeking relief
from specified requirements of Federal Aviation Regulations. The
purpose of this notice is to improve the public's awareness of, and
participation in, the FAA's exemption process. Neither publication of
this notice nor the inclusion or omission of information in the summary
is intended to affect the legal status of the petition or its final
disposition.

DATES: Comments on this petition must identify the petition docket
number and must be received on or before September 25, 2019.

ADDRESSES: Send comments identified by docket number FAA-2019-0477
using any of the following methods:
     Federal eRulemaking Portal: Go to http://www.regulations.gov and follow the online instructions for sending your
comments electronically.
     Mail: Send comments to Docket Operations, M-30; U.S.
Department of Transportation, 1200 New Jersey Avenue SE, Room W12-140,
West Building Ground Floor, Washington, DC 20590-0001.
     Hand Delivery or Courier: Take comments to Docket
Operations in Room W12-140 of the West Building Ground Floor at 1200
New Jersey Avenue SE, Washington, DC 20590-0001, between 9 a.m. and 5
p.m., Monday through Friday, except Federal holidays.
     Fax: Fax comments to Docket Operations at<PHONE_NUMBER>.
    Privacy: In accordance with 5 U.S.C. 553(c), DOT solicits comments
from the public to better inform its rulemaking process. DOT posts
these comments, without edit, including any personal information the
commenter provides, to http://www.regulations.gov, as described in the
system of records notice (DOT/ALL-14 FDMS), which can be reviewed at
http://www.dot.gov/privacy.
    Docket: Background documents or comments received may be read at
http://www.regulations.gov at any time. Follow the online instructions
for accessing the docket or go to the Docket Operations in Room W12-140
of the West Building Ground Floor at 1200 New Jersey Avenue SE,
Washington, DC 20590-0001, between 9 a.m. and 5 p.m., Monday through
Friday, except Federal holidays.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Jake Troutman,<PHONE_NUMBER>, Office
of Rulemaking, Federal Aviation Administration, 800 Independence Avenue
SW, Washington, DC 20591.
    This notice is published pursuant to 14 CFR 11.85.

    Issued in Washington, DC, on August 15, 2019.
John Linsenmeyer,
Acting Deputy Director, Office of Rulemaking.

Petition for Exemption

    Docket No.: FAA-2019-0477.
    Petitioner: A-Cam Aerials, LLC.
    Section(s) of 14 CFR Affected: part 45, Subpart C; part 47;
Sec. Sec.  61.3(a)(1); 91.7(a); 91.119(c); 91.121; 91.151(b);
91.405(a); 91.407(a)(1); 91.409(a)(1) & (2); & 91.417(a) & (b).
    Description of Relief Sought: The proposed exemption, if granted,
would allow the petitioner to operate the Watts Innovations MFD5000
unmanned aircraft system, weighing over 55 pounds (lbs.) but no more
than 100 lbs., for aerial photography and cinematography operations.
The proposed operation would allow the use of a pilot in command who
holds a part 107 remote pilot certificate, rather than an airline
transport, commercial, private, recreational, or sport pilot
certificate. Additionally, the petitioner proposes to operate within
500 feet (ft.) of consenting individuals and uninvolved individuals.
Flights will be limited to a maximum altitude of 400 ft. above ground
level or within 400 ft. of a structure.

[FR Doc. 2019-19139 Filed 9-4-19; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910-13-P


[Federal Register: October 25, 2010 (Volume 75, Number 205)]
[Proposed Rules]
[Page 65442]
[DOCID:fr25oc10-6]

========================================================================
Proposed Rules
                                                Federal Register
________________________________________________________________________

This section of the FEDERAL REGISTER contains notices to the public of
the proposed issuance of rules and regulations. The purpose of these
notices is to give interested persons an opportunity to participate in
the rule making prior to the adoption of the final rules.

========================================================================

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

17 CFR Parts 229, 240, and 249

[Release Nos. 33-9148A; 34-63029A; File No. S7-24-10]
RIN 3235-AK75

Disclosure for Asset-Backed Securities Required by Section 943 of
the Dodd-Frank Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protection Act

AGENCY: Securities and Exchange Commission.

ACTION: Proposed rule; correction.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Securities and Exchange Commission published a document in
the Federal Register of October 13, 2010, concerning Disclosure for
Asset-Backed Securities Required by Section 943 of the Dodd-Frank Wall
Street Reform and Consumer Protection Act. The document contained an
incorrect reference to Sec.  249.1300. This correction is being
published to correct the reference.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Rolaine Bancroft, Attorney-Advisor, in
the Office of Rulemaking, at<PHONE_NUMBER>, Division of Corporation
Finance, U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission, 100 F Street, NE.,
Washington, DC 20549-3628 or, with respect to proposed Rule 17g-7,
Joseph I. Levinson, Special Counsel, at<PHONE_NUMBER>; Division of
Trading and Markets, U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission, 100 F
Street, NE., Washington, DC 20549-3628.

Correction

    In the Federal Register of October 13, 2010, in FR Doc. 2010-25361,
the reference ``249.1300'' is corrected to read ``249.1400'' in the
following places:
    On page 62719, in footnote 7 in the first column, two lines from
the bottom;
    On page 62735, in the first column, two lines from the top;
    On page 62736, in the first column, thirty-one lines from the top;
    On page 62736, in the first column, eight lines from the bottom;
    On page 62736, in the first column, three lines from the bottom;
    On page 62736, in the second column, two lines from the top; and
    On page 62736, in the second column, six lines from the top.

    Dated: October 19, 2010.
Elizabeth M. Murphy,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2010-26810 Filed 10-22-10; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 8011-01-P


[Federal Register Volume 76, Number 123 (Monday, June 27, 2011)]
[Notices]
[Pages 37349-37350]
[FR Doc No: 2011-16032]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY

[EPA-HQ-OECA-2010-0377; FRL-9324-6]

Agency Information Collection Activities; Submission to OMB for
Review and Approval; Comment Request; NESHAP for Solvent Extraction for
Vegetable Oil Production (Renewal)

AGENCY: Environmental Protection Agency (EPA).

ACTION: Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: In compliance with the Paperwork Reduction Act (44 U.S.C. 3501
et seq.), this document announces that an Information Collection
Request (ICR) has been forwarded to the Office of Management and Budget
(OMB) for review and approval. This is a request to renew an existing
approved collection. The ICR which is abstracted below describes the
nature of the collection and the estimated burden and cost.

DATES: Additional comments may be submitted on or before July 27, 2011.

ADDRESSES: Submit your comments, referencing docket ID number EPA-HQ-
OECA-2010-0377, to (1) EPA online using http://www.regulations.gov (our
preferred method), or by e-mail to<EMAIL_ADDRESS>or by mail to:
EPA Docket Center (EPA/DC), Environmental Protection Agency,
Enforcement and Compliance Docket and Information Center, mail code
28221T, 1200 Pennsylvania Avenue, NW., Washington, DC 20460, and (2)
OMB at: Office of Information and Regulatory Affairs, Office of
Management and Budget (OMB), Attention: Desk Officer for EPA, 725 17th
Street, NW., Washington, DC 20503.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Learia Williams, Monitoring,
Assistance, and Media Programs Division, Office of Compliance, Mail
Code 2223A, Environmental Protection Agency, 1200 Pennsylvania Avenue,
NW., Washington, DC 20460; telephone number:<PHONE_NUMBER>; fax
number:<PHONE_NUMBER>; e-mail address<EMAIL_ADDRESS>
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: EPA has submitted the following ICR to OMB
for review and approval according to the procedures prescribed in 5 CFR
1320.12. On June 2, 2010 (75 FR 30812), EPA sought comments on this ICR
pursuant to 5 CFR 1320.8(d). EPA received no comments. Any additional
comments on this ICR should be submitted to EPA and OMB within 30 days
of this notice.
    EPA has established a public docket for this ICR under docket ID
number EPA-HQ-OECA-2010-0377, which is available for public viewing
online at http://www.regulations.gov, or in person viewing at the
Enforcement and Compliance Docket in the EPA Docket Center (EPA/DC),
EPA West, Room 3334, 1301 Constitution Avenue, NW., Washington, DC. The
EPA Docket Center Public Reading Room is open from 8:30 a.m. to 4:30
p.m., Monday through Friday, excluding legal holidays. The telephone
number for the Reading Room is<PHONE_NUMBER>, and the telephone number
for the Enforcement and Compliance Docket is<PHONE_NUMBER>.
    Use EPA's electronic docket and comment system at http://www.regulations.gov to submit or view public comments, access the index
listing of the contents of the docket, and to access those documents in
the docket that are available electronically. Once in the system,
select ``docket search,'' then key in the docket ID number identified
above. Please note that EPA's policy is that public comments, whether
submitted electronically or in paper, will be made available for public
viewing at http://www.regulations.gov as EPA receives them and without
change, unless the comment contains copyrighted material, Confidential
Business Information (CBI), or other information whose public
disclosure is restricted by statute. For further information about the
electronic docket, go to http://www.regulations.gov.
    Title: NESHAP for Solvent Extraction for Vegetable Oil Production
(Renewal).
    ICR Numbers: EPA ICR Number 1947.05, OMB Control Number 2060-0471.
    ICR Status: This ICR is scheduled to expire on July 31, 2011. Under
OMB regulations, the Agency may continue to conduct or sponsor the
collection of information while this submission is pending at OMB. An
agency may not conduct or sponsor, and a person is not required to
respond to, a collection of information unless it displays a currently
valid OMB control number. The OMB control numbers for EPA's regulations
in title 40 of the CFR, after appearing in the Federal Register when
approved, are listed in 40 CFR part 9, and displayed either by
publication in the Federal Register or by other appropriate means, such
as on the related collection instrument or form, if applicable. The
display of OMB control numbers in certain EPA regulations is
consolidated in 40 CFR part 9.
    Abstract: The affected entities are subject to the General
Provisions of the NESHAP at 40 CFR part 63, subpart A, and any changes,
or additions to the Provisions specified at 40 CFR part 63, subpart
GGGG.
    Owners or operators of the affected facilities must submit a one-
time-only report of any physical or operational changes, initial
performance tests, and periodic reports and results. Owners or
operators are also required to maintain records of the occurrence and
duration of any startup, shutdown, or malfunction in the operation of
an affected facility, or any period during which the monitoring system
is inoperative. Reports, at a minimum, are required semiannually.
    Burden Statement: The annual public reporting and recordkeeping
burden for this collection of information is estimated to average 185
hours per response. Burden means the total time, effort, or financial
resources expended by persons to generate, maintain, retain, or
disclose or provide information to or for a Federal agency. This
includes the time needed to review instructions; develop, acquire,
install, and utilize technology and systems for the purposes of
collecting, validating, and verifying information, processing and
maintaining information, and disclosing and providing information;
adjust the existing ways to comply with any previously applicable
instructions and requirements which have subsequently changed; train
personnel to be able to respond to a collection of information; search
data sources; complete and review the collection of information; and
transmit or otherwise disclose the information.
    Respondents/Affected Entities: Owners or operators of vegetable oil
production facilities.

    Estimated Number of Respondents: 101.
    Frequency of Response: Initially, on-occasion and annually.
    Estimated Total Annual Hour Burden: 39,385.
    Estimated Total Annual Cost: $2,512,947, which includes $2,512,947
in labor costs, no capital/startup costs, and no operation and
maintenance (O&M) costs.
    Changes in the Estimates: There is no change in the labor hours or
cost in the ICR compared to the previous ICR. This is due to two
considerations: (1) The regulations have not changed over the past
three years and are not anticipated to change over the next three
years; and (2) the growth rate for the industry is very low, negative
or non-existent. Therefore, the labor hours and cost figures in the
previous ICR reflect the current burden to the respondents and are
reiterated in this ICR.

    Dated: June 21, 2011.
John Moses,
Director, Collection Strategies Division.
[FR Doc. 2011-16032 Filed 6-24-11; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6560-50-P