[Federal Register Volume 81, Number 31 (Wednesday, February 17, 2016)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Pages 7976-7978]
[FR Doc No: 2016-03117]

=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY

40 CFR Part 52

[EPA-R06-OAR-2015-0431; FRL-9942-29-Region 6]

Approval and Promulgation of Implementation Plans; New Mexico/
Albuquerque-Bernalillo County; Infrastructure and Interstate Transport
State Implementation Plan for the 2010 Sulfur Dioxide National Ambient
Air Quality Standards

AGENCY: Environmental Protection Agency (EPA).

ACTION: Final rule.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) is approving a State
Implementation Plan (SIP) submission from the Governor of New Mexico
for the City of Albuquerque-Bernalillo County for the 2010 Sulfur
Dioxide (SO2) National Ambient Air Quality Standards
(NAAQS). The submittal addresses how the existing SIP provides for
implementation, maintenance, and enforcement of the 2010 SO2
NAAQS (infrastructure SIP or i-SIP). This i-SIP ensures that the
State's SIP for Albuquerque-Bernalillo County is adequate to meet the
state's responsibilities under the Federal Clean Air Act (CAA or Act),
including the four CAA requirements for interstate transport of
SO2 emissions.

DATES: This final rule is effective on March 18, 2016.

ADDRESSES: EPA has established a docket for this action under Docket ID
No. EPA-R06-OAR-2015-0431. All documents in the docket are listed on
the http://www.regulations.gov Web site. Although listed in the index,
some information is not publicly available, e.g., Confidential Business
Information or other information whose disclosure is restricted by
statute. Certain other material, such as copyrighted material, is not
placed on the Internet and will be publicly available only in hard copy
form. Publicly available docket materials are available either
electronically through http://www.regulations.gov or in hard copy at
the EPA Region 6, 1445 Ross Avenue, Suite 700, Dallas, Texas 75202-
2733.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Tracie Donaldson,<PHONE_NUMBER>,
<EMAIL_ADDRESS>
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Throughout this document ``we,'' ``us,'' and
``our'' means the EPA.

I. Background

    The background for this action is discussed in detail in our
November 12, 2015 Proposal (80 FR 69925). In that notice, we proposed
that the Albuquerque-Bernalillo County New Mexico i-SIP submittal for
the 2010 SO2 NAAQS met the requirements for an i-SIP,
including the requirements for interstate transport of SO2
emissions. Our Proposal and the technical support documents (TSDs) that
accompanied the proposed rule provide detailed descriptions of the
revisions and the rationale for our proposed decisions. Please see the
docket for these and other documents regarding our Proposal. The public
comment period for our Proposal closed on December 14, 2015.

II. Comment Received

    We received one comment, which is posted in the docket, but is not
relevant to the subject of this rulemaking.

III. Final Action

    We are approving the June 11, 2015 i-SIP submission from
Albuquerque-Bernalillo County New Mexico, which address the
requirements of CAA sections 110(a)(1) and (2) as applicable to the
2010 SO2 NAAQS. Specifically, we are approving the following
infrastructure elements: 110(a)(2)(A), (B), (C), (D), (E), (F), (G),
(H), (J), (K), (L), and (M). We are also approving the New Mexico-
Albuquerque-Bernalillo County demonstration as it meets the four
statutory requirements for interstate transport of SO2
emissions.

IV. Statutory and Executive Order Reviews

    Under the CAA, the Administrator is required to approve a SIP
submission that complies with the provisions of the Act and applicable
Federal regulations. 42 U.S.C. 7410(k); 40 CFR 52.02(a). Thus, in
reviewing SIP submissions, EPA's role is to approve state choices,
provided that they meet the criteria of the CAA. Accordingly, this
action merely approves state law as meeting Federal requirements and
does not impose additional requirements beyond those imposed by state
law. For that reason, this action:
     Is not a ``significant regulatory action'' subject to
review by the Office of Management and Budget under Executive Orders
12866 (58 FR 51735, October 4, 1993) and 13563 (76 FR 3821, January 21,
2011);
     Does not impose an information collection burden under the
provisions of the Paperwork Reduction Act (44 U.S.C. 3501 et seq.);
     Is certified as not having a significant economic impact
on a substantial number of small entities under the Regulatory
Flexibility Act (5 U.S.C. 601 et seq.);
     Does not contain any unfunded mandate or significantly or
uniquely affect small governments, described in the Unfunded Mandates
Reform Act of 1995 (Pub. L. 104-4);
     Does not have Federalism implications as specified in
Executive Order 13132 (64 FR 43255, August 10, 1999);
     Is not an economically significant regulatory action based
on health or safety risks subject to Executive Order 13045 (62 FR
19885, April 23, 1997);
     Is not a significant regulatory action subject to
Executive Order 13211 (66 FR 28355, May 22, 2001);
     Is not subject to requirements of section 12(d) of the
National Technology Transfer and Advancement Act of 1995 (15 U.S.C. 272
note) because application of those requirements would be inconsistent
with the Clean Air Act; and
     Does not provide EPA with the discretionary authority to
address, as appropriate, disproportionate human health or environmental
effects, using practicable and legally permissible methods, under
Executive Order 12898 (59 FR 7629, February 16, 1994).
    In addition, the SIP is not approved to apply on any Indian
reservation land or in any other area where EPA or an Indian tribe has
demonstrated that a tribe has jurisdiction. In those areas of Indian
country, the rule does not have tribal implications and will not impose
substantial direct costs on tribal governments or preempt tribal law as
specified by Executive Order 13175 (65 FR 67249, November 9, 2000).
    The Congressional Review Act, 5 U.S.C. 801 et seq., as added by the
Small Business Regulatory Enforcement Fairness Act of 1996, generally
provides that before a rule may take effect, the agency promulgating
the rule must submit a rule report, which includes a copy of the rule,
to each House of the Congress and to the Comptroller General of the
United States. EPA will submit a report containing this action and
other required information to the U.S. Senate, the U.S. House of
Representatives, and the Comptroller General of the United States prior
to publication of the rule in the Federal Register. A major rule cannot
take effect until 60 days after it is published in the Federal
Register. This action is not a ``major rule'' as defined by 5 U.S.C.
804(2).
    Under section 307(b)(1) of the CAA, petitions for judicial review
of this action must be filed in the United States Court of Appeals for
the appropriate circuit by April 18, 2016. Filing a petition for
reconsideration by the Administrator of this final rule does not affect
the finality of this action for the purposed of judicial review nor
does it extend the time within which a petition for judicial review may
be filed, and shall not postpone the effectiveness of such rule or
action. This action may not be challenged later in proceedings to
enforce its requirements. (See section 307(b)(2).)

List of Subjects in 40 CFR Part 52

    Environmental protection, Air pollution control, Incorporation by
reference, Intergovernmental relations, Reporting and recordkeeping
requirements, Sulfur dioxide (SO2).

    Dated: February 4, 2016.
Ron Curry,
Regional Administrator, Region 6.

    40 CFR part 52 is amended as follows:

PART 52--APPROVAL AND PROMULGATION OF IMPLEMENTATION PLANS

0
1. The authority citation for part 52 continues to read as follows:

    Authority:  42 U.S.C. 7401 et seq.

Subpart GG--New Mexico

0
2. The second table in Sec.  52.1620(e) entitled ``EPA Approved
Nonregulatory Provisions and Quasi-Regulatory Measures in the New
Mexico SIP'' is amended by adding a new entry at the end of the table
``Infrastructure and Interstate Transport for the 2010 SO2
NAAQS''.
    The addition reads as follows:

Sec.  52.1620  Identification of plan.

* * * * *
    (e) * * *

            EPA Approved Nonregulatory Provisions and Quasi-Regulatory Measures in the New Mexico SIP
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
                                    Applicable
                                  geographic or         State        EPA approval
     Name of SIP provision        nonattainment      submittal/          date                Explanation
                                       area        effective date
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

                                                  * * * * * * *
Infrastructure and Interstate   Albuquerque-            6/11/2015  2/17/16 [Insert   ...........................
 Transport for the 2010 SO2      Bernalillo                         FR page number
 NAAQS.                          County.                            where document
                                                                    begins].
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

[FR Doc. 2016-03117 Filed 2-16-16; 8:45 am]
 BILLING CODE 6560-50-P