[Federal Register Volume 87, Number 204 (Monday, October 24, 2022)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Pages 64160-64162]
[FR Doc No: 2022-22498]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION

Federal Aviation Administration

14 CFR Part 71

[Docket No. FAA-2022-0167; Airspace Docket No. 22-AGL-14]
RIN 2120-AA66

Establishment of Class D Airspace; Chicago/Romeoville, IL

AGENCY: Federal Aviation Administration (FAA), DOT.

ACTION: Final rule.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: This action establishes Class D airspace at Chicago/
Romeoville, IL. This action supports the establishment of an air
traffic control tower at Lewis University Airport, Chicago/Romeoville,
IL.

DATES: Effective 0901 UTC, December 29, 2022. The Director of the
Federal Register approves this incorporation by reference action under
1 CFR part 51, subject to the annual revision of FAA Order JO 7400.11
and publication of conforming amendments.

ADDRESSES: FAA Order JO 7400.11G, Airspace Designations and Reporting
Points, and subsequent amendments can be viewed online at www.faa.gov/air_traffic/publications/. For further information, you can contact the
Airspace Policy Group, Federal Aviation Administration, 800
Independence Avenue SW, Washington, DC 20591; telephone: (202) 267-
8783.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Jeffrey Claypool, Federal Aviation
Administration, Operations Support Group, Central Service Center, 10101
Hillwood Parkway, Fort Worth, TX 76177; telephone<PHONE_NUMBER>.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

Authority for This Rulemaking

    The FAA's authority to issue rules regarding aviation safety is
found in Title 49 of the United States Code. Subtitle I, Section 106
describes the authority of the FAA Administrator. Subtitle VII,
Aviation Programs, describes in more detail the scope of the agency's
authority. This rulemaking is promulgated under the authority described
in Subtitle VII, Part A, Subpart I, Section 40103. Under that section,
the FAA is charged with prescribing regulations to assign the use of
airspace necessary to ensure the safety of aircraft and the efficient
use of airspace. This regulation is within the scope of that authority
as it establishes Class D airspace at Lewis University Airport,
Chicago/Romeoville, IL, to support instrument flight rule operations at
this airport.

History

    The FAA published a notice of proposed rulemaking (NPRM) in the
Federal Register (87 FR 16435; March 23, 2022) for Docket No. FAA-2022-
0167 to establish Class D airspace at Chicago/Romeoville, IL.
Interested parties were invited to participate in this rulemaking
effort by submitting written comments on the proposal to the FAA.
Eleven (11) comments were received. Ten (10) recommending a reduction
in the proposed airspace, and two (2) stating that the air traffic
control tower and airspace were not necessary. The following responses
are provided.
    In response to the recommendations that the airspace be reduced:
The FAA has reviewed the recommendations, and determined that an
exclusion area could be supported as well as reducing the vertical
limit of the airspace from 3,200 feet MSL to 2,900 feet MSL. This area
is not as large as that recommended in the comments due to requirements
for the airspace to protect the instrument procedures at Lewis
University Airport as required by FAA Order JO 7400.2N, Procedures for
Handling Airspace Matters.
    In response to the comments regarding the need for the air traffic
control tower and associated airspace: The Joliet Regional Port
District commissioned the construction of an air traffic control tower
in accordance with (IAW) applicable FAA orders and directives, and
applied for air traffic services through the FAA Contract Tower program
IAW FAA Order JO 7210.78, FAA Contract Tower (FCT) New Start and
Replacement Tower Process. LOT has since been accepted into the FCT
program. The LOT FCT will provide terminal services and thus requires
class D airspace IAW FAA Order JO 74002.N.
    Class D airspace designations are published in paragraph 5000 of
FAA Order JO 7400.11G, dated August 19, 2022, and effective September
15, 2022, which is incorporated by reference in 14 CFR 71.1. The Class
D airspace designations listed in this document will be published
subsequently in FAA Order JO 7400.11.

Availability and Summary of Documents for Incorporation by Reference

    This document amends FAA Order JO 7400.11G, Airspace Designations
and Reporting Points, dated August 19, 2022, and effective September
15, 2022. FAA Order JO 7400.11G is publicly available as listed in the
ADDRESSES section of this document. FAA Order JO 7400.11G lists Class
A, B, C, D, and E airspace areas, air traffic service routes, and
reporting points.

Differences From the NPRM

    An exclusion area has been added to the airspace legal description
and the vertical limit of the airspace reduced from 3,200 feet MSL to
2,900 feet MSL in response to the comments received from the NPRM. As
these changes are a reduction in the airspace previously proposed, they
have been incorporated into this final rule.
    The term ``Notice to Airmen'' has been updated to ``Notice to Air
Missions'' since the NPRM was published. As this is an administrative
amendment and does not affect the airspace as proposed in the NPRM,
this update has been incorporated into this action.

The Rule

    This amendment to 14 CFR part 71 establishes Class D airspace
within a 4.1-mile radius of Lewis University Airport, Chicago/
Romeoville, IL, extending from the surface up to and including 2,900
feet MSL excluding that area north of a line from lat. 41[deg]37'56''
N, long. 88[deg]10'54'' W to lat. 41[deg]40'21'' N, long.
88[deg]06'02'' W to lat. 41[deg]40'35'' N, long. 88[deg]05'57'' W.
    This action supports the establishment of an air traffic control
tower at Lewis University Airport.
    FAA Order JO 7400.11, Airspace Designations and Reporting Points,
is published yearly and effective on September 15.

Regulatory Notices and Analyses

    The FAA has determined that this regulation only involves an
established body of technical regulations for which frequent and
routine amendments are necessary to keep them operationally current, is
non-controversial and unlikely to result in adverse or negative
comments. It, therefore: (1) is not a ``significant regulatory action''
under Executive Order 12866; (2) is not a ``significant rule'' under
DOT Regulatory Policies and Procedures (44 FR 11034; February 26,
1979); and (3) does not warrant preparation of a regulatory evaluation
as the anticipated impact is so minimal. Since this is a routine matter
that only affects air traffic procedures and air navigation, it is
certified that this rule, when promulgated, does not have a significant
economic impact on a substantial number of small entities under the
criteria of the Regulatory Flexibility Act.

Environmental Review

    The FAA has determined that this action qualifies for categorical
exclusion under the National Environmental Policy Act in accordance
with FAA Order 1050.1F, ``Environmental Impacts: Policies and
Procedures,'' paragraph 5-6.5.a. This airspace action is not expected
to cause any potentially significant environmental impacts, and no
extraordinary circumstances exist that warrant preparation of an
environmental assessment.

Lists of Subjects in 14 CFR Part 71

    Airspace, Incorporation by reference, Navigation (air).

Adoption of the Amendment

    In consideration of the foregoing, the Federal Aviation
Administration amends 14 CFR part 71 as follows:

PART 71--DESIGNATION OF CLASS A, B, C, D, AND E AIRSPACE AREAS; AIR
TRAFFIC SERVICE ROUTES; AND REPORTING POINTS

0
1. The authority citation for part 71 continues to read as follows:

    Authority: 49 U.S.C. 106(f), 106(g); 40103, 40113, 40120; E.O.
10854, 24 FR 9565, 3 CFR, 1959-1963 Comp., p. 389.

71.1  [Amended]

0
2. The incorporation by reference in 14 CFR 71.1 of FAA Order JO
7400.11G, Airspace Designations and Reporting Points, dated August 19,
2022, and effective September 15, 2022, is amended as follows:

Paragraph 5000 Class D Airspace.

* * * * *

AGL IL D Chicago/Romeoville, IL [Establish]

Lewis University Airport, IL
    (Lat. 41[deg]36'29'' N, long. 88[deg]05'47'' W)

    That airspace extending upward from the surface to and including
2,900 feet MSL within a 4.1-mile radius of Lewis University Airport
excluding that area north of a line from lat. 41[deg]37'56'' N,
long. 88[deg]10'54'' W to lat. 41[deg]40'21'' N, long.
88[deg]06'02'' W to lat. 41[deg]40'35'' N, long. 88[deg]05'57'' W.
This Class D airspace area is effective during specific dates and
times established in advance by a Notice to Air Missions. The
effective dates and times will thereafter be continuously published
in the Chart Supplement.

    Issued in Fort Worth, Texas, on October 12, 2022.
Martin A. Skinner,
Acting Manager, Operations Support Group, ATO Central Service Center.
[FR Doc. 2022-22498 Filed 10-21-22; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910-13-P


[Federal Register Volume 88, Number 8 (Thursday, January 12, 2023)]
[Notices]
[Pages 2157-2158]
[FR Doc No: 2023-00443]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION

Federal Motor Carrier Safety Administration

[Docket No. FMCSA-2013-0121; FMCSA-2014-0102; FMCSA-2018-0136]

Qualification of Drivers; Exemption Applications; Hearing

AGENCY: Federal Motor Carrier Safety Administration (FMCSA), Department
of Transportation (DOT).

ACTION: Notice of final disposition.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: FMCSA announces its decision to renew exemptions for five
individuals from the hearing requirement in the Federal Motor Carrier
Safety Regulations (FMCSRs) for interstate commercial motor vehicle
(CMV) drivers. The exemptions enable these hard of hearing and deaf
individuals to continue to operate CMVs in interstate commerce.

DATES: The exemptions were applicable on December 16, 2022. The
exemptions expire on December 16, 2024.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Ms. Christine A. Hydock, Chief,
Medical Programs Division, FMCSA, DOT, 1200 New Jersey Avenue SE, Room
W64-224, Washington, DC 20590-0001,<PHONE_NUMBER>,
[email protected]. Office hours are 8:30 a.m. to 5 p.m. ET Monday
through Friday, except Federal holidays. If you have questions
regarding viewing or submitting material to the docket, contact Dockets
Operations,<PHONE_NUMBER>.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

I. Public Participation

A. Viewing Comments

    To view comments go to www.regulations.gov. Insert the docket
numbers (FMCSA-2013-0121, FMCSA-2014-0102, or FMCSA-2018-0136) in the
keyword box and click ``Search.'' Next, sort the results by ``Posted
(Newer-Older),'' choose the first notice listed, and click ``Browse
Comments.'' If you do not have access to the internet, you may view the
docket online by visiting Dockets Operations in Room W12-140 on the
ground floor of the DOT West Building, 1200 New Jersey Avenue SE,
Washington, DC 20590-0001, between 9 a.m. and 5 p.m. ET Monday through
Friday, except Federal holidays. To be sure someone is there to help
you, please call<PHONE_NUMBER> or<PHONE_NUMBER> before visiting
Dockets Operations.

B. Privacy Act

    In accordance with 49 U.S.C. 31315(b)(6), DOT solicits comments
from the public on the exemption requests. DOT posts these comments,
without edit, including any personal information the commenter
provides, to www.regulations.gov. As described in the system of records
notice DOT/ALL 14 (Federal Docket Management System), which can be
reviewed at https://www.transportation.gov/individuals/privacy/privacy-act-system-records-notices, the comments are searchable by the name of
the submitter.

II. Background

    On November 29, 2022, FMCSA published a notice announcing its
decision to renew exemptions for five individuals from the hearing
standard in 49 CFR 391.41(b)(11) to operate a CMV in interstate
commerce and requested comments from the public (87 FR 73388). The
public comment period ended on December 29, 2022, and no comments were
received.
    FMCSA has evaluated the eligibility of these applicants and
determined that renewing these exemptions would likely achieve a level
of safety that is equivalent to, or greater than, the level that would
be achieved by complying with Sec.  391.41(b)(11).
    The physical qualification standard for drivers regarding hearing
found in Sec.  391.41(b)(11) states that a person is physically
qualified to drive a CMV if that person first perceives a forced
whispered voice in the better ear at not less than 5 feet with or
without the use of a hearing aid or, if tested by use of an audiometric
device, does not have an average hearing loss in the better ear greater
than 40 decibels at 500 Hz, 1,000 Hz, and 2,000 Hz with or without a
hearing aid when the audiometric device is calibrated to American
National Standard (formerly ASA Standard) Z24.5--1951.
    This standard was adopted in 1970 and was revised in 1971 to allow
drivers to be qualified under this standard while wearing a hearing aid
(35 FR 6458, 6463 (Apr. 22, 1970) and 36 FR 12857 (July 8, 1971),
respectively).

III. Discussion of Comments

    FMCSA received no comments in this proceeding.

IV. Conclusion

    Based upon its evaluation of the five renewal exemption
applications, FMCSA announces its decision to exempt the following
drivers from the hearing requirement in Sec.  391.41 (b)(11).
    As of December 16, 2022, and in accordance with 49 U.S.C. 31136(e)
and 31315(b), the following five individuals have satisfied the renewal
conditions for obtaining an exemption from the hearing requirement in
the FMCSRs for interstate CMV drivers (87 FR 73388):

James Dignan (TX)
Ahmed Gabr (NC)
Arnold Hatton (DE)
Fernando Ramirez-Savon (FL)
Eric Woods (MD)

    The drivers were included in docket numbers FMCSA-2013-0121, FMCSA-
2014-0102, or FMCSA-2018-0136. Their exemptions were applicable as of
December 16, 2022 and will expire on December 16, 2024.
    In accordance with 49 U.S.C. 31315(b), each exemption will be valid
for 2 years from the effective date unless revoked earlier by FMCSA.
The exemption will be revoked if the

following occurs: (1) the person fails to comply with the terms and
conditions of the exemption; (2) the exemption has resulted in a lower
level of safety than was maintained prior to being granted; or (3)
continuation of the exemption would not be consistent with the goals
and objectives of 49 U.S.C. 31136, 49 U.S.C. chapter 313, or the
FMCSRs.

Larry W. Minor,
Associate Administrator for Policy.
[FR Doc. 2023-00443 Filed 1-11-23; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910-EX-P


[Federal Register Volume 84, Number 201 (Thursday, October 17, 2019)]
[Notices]
[Pages 55572-55573]
[FR Doc No: 2019-22679]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission

[Docket No. CP20-2-000]

National Fuel Gas Supply Corporation; Notice of Application To
Amend

    Take notice that on October 2, 2019, National Fuel Gas Supply
Corporation (National Fuel), 6363 Main Street, Williamsville, New York
14221, filed in Docket No. CP20-2-000 an application pursuant to
sections 7(b) and 7(c) of the Natural Gas Act (NGA) for authorization
to amend its certificate of public convenience and necessity issued by
Commission order on September 6, 2017 (Certificate Order) in Docket No.
CP16-28-000, all as more fully set forth in the application which is on
file with the Commission and open to public inspection. The filing may
be viewed on the Commission's website at http://www.ferc.gov using the
``eLibrary'' link. Enter the docket number excluding the last three
digits in the docket number field to access the document. For
assistance, contact FERC at<EMAIL_ADDRESS>or call toll-
free,<PHONE_NUMBER> or TYY,<PHONE_NUMBER>.
    Specifically, National Fuel requests authorization to amend the
Certificate Order and to vacate certain authorizations in that order.
National Fuel seeks to now abandon by sale to Catalyst Energy, Inc. its
Queen Storage Field and Queen Compressor Station, located in Forest and
Warren Counties, Pennsylvania. National Fuel also seeks to vacate
certain authorizations in the Certificate Order to reflect that it will
no longer sell a portion of Line Q, abandon the remaining portion of
Line Q, and it will no longer proceed with construction and operation
of the Line QP.
    Any questions regarding the amendment should be directed to Alice
A. Curtiss, Deputy General Counsel, National Fuel Gas Supply
Corporation, 6363 Main Street, Williamsville, New York 14221 at (716)
857-7075, or at<EMAIL_ADDRESS>    Pursuant to section 157.9 of the Commission's rules (18 CFR 157.9),
within 90 days of this Notice, the Commission staff will issue a Notice
of Schedule for Environmental Review. If a Notice of Schedule for
Environmental Review is issued, it will indicate, among other
milestones, the anticipated date for the Commission staff's issuance of
the environmental assessment (EA) for this proposal. The issuance of a
Notice of Schedule for Environmental Review will serve to notify
federal and state agencies of the timing for the completion of all
necessary reviews, and the subsequent need to complete all federal
authorizations within 90 days of the date of issuance of the Commission
staff's EA.
    There are two ways to become involved in the Commission's review of
this project. First, any person wishing to obtain legal status by
becoming a party to the proceedings for this project should, on or
before the comment date stated below file with the Federal Energy
Regulatory Commission, 888 First Street NE, Washington, DC 20426, a
motion to intervene in accordance with the requirements of the
Commission's Rules of Practice and Procedure (18 CFR 385.214 or
385.211) and the Regulations under the NGA (18 CFR 157.10). A person
obtaining party status will be placed on the service list maintained by
the Secretary of the Commission and will receive copies of all
documents filed by the applicant and by all other parties. A party must
submit seven copies of filings made in the proceeding with the
Commission and must mail a copy to the applicant and to every other
party. Only parties to the proceeding can ask for court review of
Commission orders in the proceeding.
    However, a person does not have to intervene in order to have
comments considered. The second way to participate is by filing with
the Secretary of the Commission, as soon as possible, an original and
two copies of comments in support of or in opposition to this project.
The Commission will consider these comments in determining the
appropriate action to be taken, but the filing of a comment alone will
not serve to make the filer a party to the proceeding. The Commission's
rules require that persons filing comments in opposition to the project
provide copies of their protests only to the party or parties directly
involved in the protest.
    Persons who wish to comment only on the environmental review of
this project should submit an original and two copies of their comments
to the Secretary of the Commission. Environmental commentors will be
placed on the Commission's environmental mailing list, will receive
copies of the environmental documents, and will be notified of meetings
associated with the Commission's environmental review process.
Environmental commentors will not be required to serve copies of filed
documents on all other parties. However, the non-party commentors will
not receive copies of all documents filed by other parties or issued by
the Commission (except for the mailing of environmental documents
issued by the Commission) and will not have the right to seek court
review of the Commission's final order.
    As of the February 27, 2018 date of the Commission's order in
Docket No. CP16-4-001, the Commission will apply its revised practice
concerning out-of-time motions to intervene in any new NGA section 3 or
section 7 proceeding.\1\ Persons desiring to become a party to a
certificate proceeding are to intervene in a timely manner. If seeking
to intervene out-of-time, the movant is required to show good cause why
the time limitation should be waived, and should provide justification
by reference to factors set forth in Rule 214(d)(1) of the Commission's
Rules and Regulations.\2\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \1\ Tennessee Gas Pipeline Company, L.L.C., 162 FERC 61,167 at
50 (2018).
    \2\ 18 CFR 385.214(d)(1).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    The Commission strongly encourages electronic filings of comments,
protests and interventions in lieu of paper using the eFiling link at
http://www.ferc.gov. Persons unable to file electronically should
submit an original and three copies of the protest or intervention to
the Federal Energy regulatory Commission, 888 First Street NE,
Washington, DC 20426.

    Comment Date: 5:00 p.m. Eastern Time on October 31, 2019.

    Dated: October 10, 2019.
Nathaniel J. Davis, Sr.,
Deputy Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2019-22679 Filed 10-16-19; 8:45 am]
 BILLING CODE 6717-01-P


[Federal Register Volume 82, Number 99 (Wednesday, May 24, 2017)]
[Notices]
[Page 23977]
[FR Doc No: 2017-10645]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION

Federal Railroad Administration

[Docket Number FRA-2017-0030]

Notice of Application for Approval of Discontinuance or
Modification of a Railroad Signal System

    Under part 235 of title 49 of the Code of Federal Regulations (CFR)
and 49 U.S.C. 20502(a), this document provides the public notice that
on April 20, 2017, Norfolk Southern Corporation (NS) petitioned the
Federal Railroad Administration (FRA) seeking approval for the
discontinuance or modification of a signal system. FRA assigned the
petition Docket Number FRA-2017-0030.
    Applicant: Norfolk Southern Corporation, Mr. B.L. Sykes, Chief
Engineer C&S Engineering, 1200 Peachtree Street SE., Atlanta, GA 30309.
    NS seeks to discontinue the traffic control system (TCS) on the
Buffalo Line between Lock Haven, PA, milepost (MP) B-end, right side/
corner (BR) 194.3 and control point (CP) North Driftwood, MP BR 139.8.
This includes the CPs at North Driftwood, Driftwood, South Driftwood,
North Keating, Keating, South Keating, North Drury, Drury, North Baker,
and South Baker and 10 automatic signals.
    NS will place a new operative approach signal at BR 192.8 in
approach to CP Lock Haven. All slide fences located at BR 139.8,
143.5,153.3, 173.8, 177.0, 179.6, and 188.8 will be maintained and
provide protection through the use of dual-tone multi-frequency radio
operation. The main track between BR 134.5 and CP Lock Haven will be
converted to NS Rule 171 operation. The signaled sidings within the
application limits at Baker, Drury, Keating, and Driftwood will be made
non-controlled, other than main track. The reason for the
discontinuance is that operations no longer require a TCS.
    A copy of the petition, as well as any written communications
concerning the petition, is available for review online at
www.regulations.gov/ and in person at the U.S. Department of
Transportation's (DOT) Docket Operations Facility, 1200 New Jersey
Avenue SE., W12-140, Washington, DC 20590. The Docket Operations
Facility is open from 9 a.m. to 5 p.m., Monday through Friday, except
Federal Holidays.
    Interested parties are invited to participate in these proceedings
by submitting written views, data, or comments. FRA does not anticipate
scheduling a public hearing in connection with these proceedings since
the facts do not appear to warrant a hearing. If any interested parties
desire an opportunity for oral comment and a public hearing, they
should notify FRA, in writing, before the end of the comment period and
specify the basis for their request.
    All communications concerning these proceedings should identify the
appropriate docket number and may be submitted by any of the following
methods:
     Web site: https://www.regulations.gov/. Follow the online
instructions for submitting comments.
     Fax:<PHONE_NUMBER>.
     Mail: Docket Operations Facility, U.S. Department of
Transportation, 1200 New Jersey Avenue SE., W12-140, Washington, DC
20590.
     Hand Delivery: 1200 New Jersey Avenue SE., Room W12-140,
Washington, DC 20590, between 9 a.m. and 5 p.m., Monday through Friday,
except Federal Holidays.
    Communications received by July 10, 2017 will be considered by FRA
before final action is taken. Comments received after that date will be
considered if practicable.
    Anyone can search the electronic form of any written communications
and comments received into any of our dockets by the name of the
individual submitting the comment (or signing the document, if
submitted on behalf of an association, business, labor union, etc.).
Under 5 U.S.C. 553(c), DOT solicits comments from the public to better
inform its processes. DOT posts these comments, without edit, including
any personal information the commenter provides, to
www.regulations.gov, as described in the system of records notice (DOT/
ALL-14 FDMS), which can be reviewed at https://www.transportation.gov/privacy. See also https://www.regulations.gov/privacyNotice for the
privacy notice of regulations.gov.

Robert C. Lauby,
Associate Administrator for Railroad Safety, Chief Safety Officer.
[FR Doc. 2017-10645 Filed 5-23-17; 8:45 am]
 BILLING CODE 4910-06-P


[Federal Register Volume 87, Number 18 (Thursday, January 27, 2022)]
[Notices]
[Page 4228]
[FR Doc No: 2022-01634]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission

Combined Notice of Filings

    Take notice that the Commission has received the following Natural
Gas Pipeline Rate and Refund Report filings:

Filings Instituting Proceedings

    Docket Numbers: RP22-493-000.
    Applicants: Fayetteville Express Pipeline LLC.
    Description: Sec.  4(d) Rate Filing: Update to GT&C Section 36 to
be effective 3/1/2022.
    Filed Date: 1/21/22.
    Accession Number: 20220121-5043.
    Comment Date: 5 p.m. ET 2/2/22.

    Any person desiring to intervene or protest in any of the above
proceedings must file in accordance with Rules 211 and 214 of the
Commission's Regulations (18 CFR 385.211 and 385.214) on or before 5:00
p.m. Eastern time on the specified comment date. Protests may be
considered, but intervention is necessary to become a party to the
proceeding.
    The filings are accessible in the Commission's eLibrary system
(https://elibrary.ferc.gov/idmws/search/fercgensearch.asp) by querying
the docket number.
    eFiling is encouraged. More detailed information relating to filing
requirements, interventions, protests, service, and qualifying
facilities filings can be found at: http://www.ferc.gov/docs-filing/efiling/filing-req.pdf. For other information, call<PHONE_NUMBER>
(toll free). For TTY, call<PHONE_NUMBER>.

     Dated: January 21, 2022.
Debbie-Anne A. Reese,
Deputy Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2022-01634 Filed 1-26-22; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6717-01-P


[Federal Register Volume 83, Number 19 (Monday, January 29, 2018)]
[Notices]
[Pages 4120-4121]
[FR Doc No: 2018-01582]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION

Federal Railroad Administration

[Docket Number FRA-2018-0003]

Petition for Waiver of Compliance

    Under Part 211 of Title 49 Code of Federal Regulations (CFR), this
provides the public notice that on December 26, 2017, Caltrain
petitioned the Federal Railroad Administration (FRA) for a waiver of
compliance from certain provisions of the Federal railroad safety
regulations contained at 49 CFR part 238. FRA assigned the petition
Docket Number FRA-2018-0003.
    Specifically, Caltrain seeks a waiver of compliance from portions
of 49 CFR 238.113(a)(3), Emergency window exits, and 238.114(a)(3),
Rescue access windows, for four cars of their new six-car Electric
Multiple Unit (EMU) trainsets. The six-car trainsets consist of two cab
cars (A and B) and four coach cars (C, D, E, and F). Each is a multi-
level car and contains three types of levels: A lower level, two
intermediate levels (on each end), and an upper level. In addition,
each car contains both intermediate level doors and lower level doors.
However, Caltrain will initially be utilizing only the lower level
doors to serve their existing 8-inch platforms. The intermediate level
doors will be utilized at some point in the future at high level
platforms. Until such time that the intermediate doors are placed in
service, passenger flip-up type seats mounted to the floor will be
placed adjacent (in front of) to these doors.
    Since the intermediate levels will be used for passenger seating,
each intermediate level is required to have a minimum of two emergency
window exits and a minimum of two rescue access windows. Two cars (D
and F) are equipped with two windows (one on each side) on the
intermediate level that serve as dual-function emergency exit and
rescue access windows. The remaining four cars (A, B, C, and E) do not
have windows on the intermediate levels due to propulsion equipment
occupying space on that level. However, all cars in the EMU trainset
are designed with exterior side doors on the intermediate levels (one
per side per intermediate level). These doors will be locked and non-
operational, and equipped with emergency release handles to allow for
manual opening of the doors for emergency egress and rescue access
through the doorway.
    Caltrain states that the intermediate level door arrangement will
meet the requirements of 49 CFR 231.112, Door emergency egress and
rescue access systems. In addition, emergency exit paths exist by way
of the stairs at the intermediate level, which can lead passengers to
either the lower level where there are additional doors and emergency
exit/access windows, or the upper levels where there are also
additional emergency exit/access windows. Lastly, there is an aisle way
that leads to the adjacent car that can be used for egress (with
exception of the cab car, cab end). Because the intermediate levels are
equipped with these features, Caltrain believes that the intent of the
emergency egress/access requirements of 49 CFR 238.113 and 238.114 are
met and provide an equivalent level of safety to passengers.
    A copy of the petition, as well as any written communications
concerning the petition, is available for review online at
www.regulations.gov and in person at the U.S. Department of
Transportation's (DOT) Docket Operations Facility, 1200 New Jersey
Avenue SE, W12-140, Washington, DC 20590. The Docket Operations
Facility is open from 9 a.m. to 5 p.m., Monday through Friday, except
Federal Holidays.
    Interested parties are invited to participate in these proceedings
by submitting written views, data, or comments. FRA does not anticipate
scheduling a public hearing in connection with these proceedings since
the facts do not appear to warrant a hearing. If any interested parties
desire an opportunity for oral comment and a public hearing, they
should notify FRA, in writing, before the end of the comment period and
specify the basis for their request.
    All communications concerning these proceedings should identify the
appropriate docket number and may be submitted by any of the following
methods:
     Website: http://www.regulations.gov. Follow the online
instructions for submitting comments.
     Fax:<PHONE_NUMBER>.
     Mail: Docket Operations Facility, U.S. Department of
Transportation, 1200 New Jersey Avenue SE, W12-140, Washington, DC
20590.
     Hand Delivery: 1200 New Jersey Avenue SE, Room W12-140,
Washington, DC 20590, between 9 a.m. and 5 p.m., Monday through Friday,
except Federal Holidays.

    Communications received by March 15, 2018 will be considered by FRA
before final action is taken. Comments received after that date will be
considered if practicable.
    Anyone can search the electronic form of any written communications
and comments received into any of our dockets by the name of the
individual submitting the comment (or signing the document, if
submitted on behalf of an association, business, labor union, etc.).
Under 5 U.S.C. 553(c), DOT solicits comments from the public to better
inform its processes. DOT posts these comments, without edit, including
any personal information the commenter provides, to
www.regulations.gov, as described in the system of records notice (DOT/
ALL-14 FDMS), which can be reviewed at https://www.transportation.gov/privacy. See also https://www.regulations.gov/privacyNotice for the
privacy notice of regulations.gov.

Robert C. Lauby,
Associate Administrator for Railroad Safety Chief Safety Officer.
[FR Doc. 2018-01582 Filed 1-26-18; 8:45 am]
 BILLING CODE 4910-06-P


STANDARD METHODS 9222 B. STANDARD TOTAL COLIFORM MEMBRANE FILTER PROCEDURE,

STANDARD METHODS 9222 D. FECAL COLIFORM MEMBRANE FILTER PROCEDURE, AND STANDARD METHODS 9222G: MF PARTITION PROCEDURES ESCHERICHIA COLI PARTITION METHODS JUNE 2003 DRAFT Draft 1 June 2003 STANDARD METHODS 9222 B. STANDARD TOTAL COLIFORM MEMBRANE FILTER PROCEDURE Reprinted by Permission from the 20th Edition 1. Laboratory Apparatus For MF analyses use glassware and other apparatus composed of material free from agents that may affect bacterial growth.

a. Sample bottles: See Section 9030B. 18.

b. Dilution bottles: See Section 9030B. 13.

c. Pipets and graduated cylinders: See Section 9030B. 9. Before sterilization, loosely cover opening of graduated cylinders with metal foil or a suitable heavy wrapping paper substitute. Immediately after sterilization secure cover to prevent contamination.

d. Containers for culture medium: Use clean borosilicate glass flasks. Any size or shape of flask may be used, but erlenmeyer flasks with metal caps, metal foil covers, or screw caps provide for adequate mixing of the medium contained and are convenient for storage.

e. Culture dishes: Use sterile borosilicate glass or disposable, presterilized plastic petri dishes, 60 × 15 mm, 50 × 9 mm, or other appropriate size. Wrap convenient numbers of clean, glass culture dishes in metal foil if sterilized by dry heat, or suitable heavy wrapping paper when autoclaved. Incubate loose lidded glass and disposable plastic culture dishes in tightly closed containers with wet paper or cloth to prevent moisture evaporation with resultant drying of medium and to maintain a humid environment for optimum colony development. Presterilized disposable plastic dishes with tight fitting lids that meet the specifications above are available commercially and are used widely. Reseal opened packages of disposable dish supplies for storage.

f. Filtration units: The filter holding assembly ( constructed of glass, autoclavable plastic, porcelain, or stainless steel) consists of a seamless funnel fastened to a base by a locking device or by magnetic force. The design should permit the membrane filter to be held securely on the porous plate of the receptacle without mechanical damage and allow all fluid to pass through the membrane during filtration. Discard plastic funnels with deep scratches on inner surface or glass funnels with chipped surfaces.

Wrap the assembly ( as a whole or separate parts) in heavy wrapping paper or aluminum foil, sterilize by autoclaving, and store until use. Alternatively expose all surfaces of the previously cleaned assembly to ultraviolet radiation ( 2 min exposure) for the initial sanitization before use in the test procedure, or before reusing units between successive filtration series. Field units may be sanitized by dipping or spraying with alcohol and then igniting or immersing in boiling water for 2 min. After submerging unit in boiling water, cool it to room temperature before reuse. Do not ignite plastic parts. Sterile, disposable field units may be used.

For filtration, mount receptacle of filter holding assembly on a 1 L filtering flask with a side tube or other suitable device ( manifold to hold three to six filter assemblies) such that a pressure differential ( 34 to 51 kPa) can be exerted on the filter membrane. Connect flask to a vacuum line, an electric vacuum pump, a filter pump operating on water pressure, a hand aspirator, or other means of securing a pressure differential ( 138 to 207 kPa). Connect a flask of approximately the same capacity between filtering flask and vacuum source to trap carry over water. Draft 2 June 2003 g. Membrane filter: Use membrane filters ( for additional specifications, see Section 9020) with a rated pore diameter such that there is complete retention of coliform bacteria. Use only those filter membranes that have been found, through adequate quality control testing and certification by the manufacturer, to exhibit: full retention of the organisms to be cultivated, stability in use, freedom from chemical extractables that may inhibit bacterial growth and development, a satisfactory speed of filtration ( within 5 min), no significant influence on medium pH ( beyond ± 0.2 units), and no increase in number of confluent colonies or spreaders compared to control membrane filters. Use membranes grid marked in such a manner that bacterial growth is neither inhibited nor stimulated along the grid lines when the membranes with entrapped bacteria are incubated on a suitable medium. Preferably use fresh stocks of membrane filters and if necessary store them in an environment without extremes of temperature and humidity. Obtain no more than a year's supply at any one time.

Preferably use presterilized membrane filters for which the manufacturer has certified that the sterilization technique has neither induced toxicity nor altered the chemical or physical properties of the membrane. If membranes are sterilized in the laboratory, autoclave for 10 min at 121 ° C. At the end of the sterilization period, let the steam escape rapidly to minimize accumulation of water of condensation on filters.

h. Absorbent pads consist of disks of filter paper or other material certified for each lot by the manufacturer to be of high quality and free of sulfites or other substances of a concentration that could inhibit bacterial growth. Use pads approximately 48 mm in diameter and of sufficient thickness to absorb 1.8 to 2.2 mL of medium. Presterilized absorbent pads or pads subsequently sterilized in the laboratory should release less than 1 mg total acidity ( calculated as CaCO3) when titrated to the phenolphthalein end point, pH 8.3, using 0.02N NaOH and produce pH levels of 7 ± 0.2. Sterilize pads simultaneously with membrane filters available in resealable kraft envelopes, or separately in other suitable containers. Dry pads so they are free of visible moisture before use. See sterilization procedure described for membrane filters above and Section 9020 for additional specifications on absorbent pads.

i. Forceps: Smooth flat forceps, without corrugations on the inner sides of the tips. Sterilize before use by dipping in 95% ethyl or absolute methyl alcohol and flaming.

j. Incubators: Use incubators to provide a temperature of 35 ± 0.5 ° C and to maintain a humid environment ( 60% relative humidity).

k. Microscope and light source: To determine colony counts on membrane filters, use a magnification of 10 to 15 diameters and a cool white fluorescent light source adjusted to give maximum sheen discernment. Optimally use a binocular wide field dissecting microscope. Do not use a microscope illuminator with optical system for light concentration from an incandescent light source for discerning coliform colonies on Endo type media. 1 Dehydrated Difco M Endo Agar LES ( No. 0736), dehydrated BBL M Endo Agar LES ( No. 11203), or equivalent.

Draft 3 June 2003 2. Materials and Culture Media The need for uniformity dictates the use of commercial dehydrated media. Never prepare media from basic ingredients when suitable dehydrated media are available. Follow manufacturer's directions for rehydration. Store opened supplies of dehydrated media in a desiccator. Commercially prepared media in liquid form ( sterile ampule or other) may be used if known to give equivalent results. See Section 9020 for media quality control specifications.

Test each new medium lot against a previously acceptable lot for satisfactory performance as described in Section 9020B. With each new lot of Endo type medium, verify a minimum 10% of coliform colonies, obtained from natural samples or samples with known additions, to establish the comparative recovery of the medium lot.

Before use, test each batch of laboratory prepared MF medium for performance with positive and negative culture controls. Check for coliform contamination at the beginning and end of each filtration series by filtering 20 to 30 mL of dilution or rinse water through the filter. If controls indicate contamination, reject all data from affected samples and request resample.

a. LES Endo agar: 1 Yeast extract...................................................................... 1.2 g Casitone or trypticase......................................................... 3.7 g Thiopeptone or thiotone...................................................... 3.7 g Tryptose............................................................................. 7.5 g Lactose.............................................................................. 9.4 g Dipotassium hydrogen phosphate, K2HPO4........................ 3.3 g Potassium dihydrogen phosphate, KH2PO4......................... 1.0 g Sodium chloride, NaCl...................................................... .3.7 g Sodium desoxycholate........................................................ 0.1 g Sodium lauryl sulfate........................................................ 0.05 g Sodium sulfite, Na2SO3...................................................... 1.6 g Basic fuchsin.................................................................... 0.8 g Agar............................................................................... 15.0 g Reagent grade water........................................................ .1.0 L Rehydrate product in 1 L water containing 20 mL 95% ethanol. Do not use denatured ethanol, which reduces background growth and coliform colony size. Bring to a near boil to dissolve agar, then promptly remove from heat and cool to 45 to 50 ° C. Do not sterilize by autoclaving. Final pH 7.2 ± 0.2. Dispense in 5 to 7 mL quantities into lower section of 60 mm glass or plastic petri dishes. If dishes of any other size are used, adjust quantity to give an equivalent depth of 4 to 5 m. Do not expose poured plates to direct sunlight; refrigerate in the dark, preferably in sealed plastic bags or other containers to reduce moisture loss. Discard unused medium after 2 weeks or sooner if there is evidence of moisture loss, medium contamination, or medium deterioration ( darkening of the medium). 2 Dehydrated Difco M Endo Broth MF ( No. 0749), dehydrated BBL m Endo Broth ( No. 11119), or equivalent may be used if absorbent pads are used.

Draft 4 June 2003 b. M Endo medium: 2 Tryptose or polypeptone..................................................... 10.0 g Thiopeptone or thiotone........................................................ 5.0 g Casitone or trypticase.......................................................... 5.0 g Yeast extract...................................................................... 1.5 g Lactose............................................................................ 12.5 g Sodium chloride, NaCl........................................................ 5.0 g Dipotassium hydrogen phosphate, K2HPO4..................... 4.375 g Potassium dihydrogen phosphate, KH2PO4..................... 1.375 g Sodium lauryl sulfate...................................................... .. 0.05 g Sodium desoxycholate....................................................... 0.10 g Sodium sulfite, Na2SO3..................................................... 2.10 g Basic fuchsin................................................................. .. 1.05 g Agar ( optional)............................................................... .15.0 g Reagent grade water........................................................ .1.0 L 1) Agar preparation   Rehydrate product in 1 L water containing 20 mL 95% ethanol. Heat to near boiling to dissolve agar, then promptly remove from heat and cool to between 45 and 50 ° C. Dispense 5 to 7 mL quantities into 60 mm sterile glass or plastic petri dishes. If dishes of any other size are used, adjust quantity to give an equivalent depth. Do not sterilize by autoclaving. Final pH should be 7.2 ± 0.2. A precipitate is normal in Endo type media. Refrigerate finished medium in the dark and discard unused agar after 2 weeks.

2) Broth preparation   Prepare as above, omitting agar. Dispense liquid medium ( at least 2.0 mL per plate) onto absorbent pads ( see absorbent pad specifications, Section 9222B. 1) and carefully remove excess medium by decanting the plate. The broth may have a precipitate but this does not interfere with medium performance if pads are certified free of sulfite or other toxic agents at a concentration that could inhibit bacterial growth. Refrigerated broth may be stored for up to 4 d.

c. Buffered dilution rinse water: See Section 9050C. 1.

4. Bibliography Fifield, C. W. & C. P. Schaufus. 1958. Improved membrane filter medium for the detection of coliform organisms. J. Amer. Water Works Assoc. 50: 193.

McCarthy, J. A. & J. E. Delaney. 1958. Membrane filter media studies. Water Sewage Works 105: 292.

Rhines, C. E. & W. P. Cheevers. 1965. Decontamination of membrane filter holders by ultraviolet light. J. Amer. Water Works Assoc. 57: 500.

Geldreich, E. E., H. L. Jeter & J. A. Winter. 1967. Technical considerations in applying the membrane filter procedure. Health Lab. Sci. 4: 113.

Watling, H. R. & R. J. Watling. 1975. Note on the trace metal content of membrane filters. Water SA 1: 28. Draft 5 June 2003 Lin, S. D. 1976. Evaluation of Millipore HA and HC membrane filters for the enumeration of indicator bacteria. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 32: 300.

Standridge, J. H. 1976. Comparison of surface pore morphology of two brands of membrane filters. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 31: 316.

Geldreich, E. E. 1976. Performance variability of membrane filter procedure. Pub. Health Lab. 34: 100.

Grabow, W. O. K. & M. Du Preez. 1979. Comparison of m Endo LES, MacConkey and Teepol media for membrane filtration counting of total coliform bacteria in water. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 38: 351.

Dutka, B. D., ed. 1981. Membrane Filtration Applications, Techniques and Problems. Marcel Dekker, Inc., New York, N. Y.

Evans, T. M., R. J. Seidler & M. W. LeChevallier. 1981. Impact of verification media and resuscitation on accuracy of the membrane filter total coliform enumeration technique. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 41: 1144.

Franzblau, S. G., B. J. Hinnebusch, T. M. Kelley & N. A. Sinclair. 1984. Effect of noncoliforms on coliform detection in potable groundwater: improved recovery with an anaerobic membrane filter technique. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 48: 142.

McFeters, G. A., J. S. Kippin & M. W. LeChevallier. 1986. Injured coliforms in drinking water. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 51: 1. 3 Rosolic acid reagent will decompose if sterilized by autoclaving. Refrigerate stock solution in the dark and discard after 2 weeks or sooner if its color changes from dark red to muddy brown.

Draft 6 June 2003 9222 D. FECAL COLIFORM MEMBRANE FILTER PROCEDURE Fecal coliform bacterial densities may be determined either by the multiple tube procedure or by the MF technique. See Section 9225 for differentiation of Escherichia coli, the predominant fecal coliform. If the MF procedure is used for chlorinated effluents, demonstrate that it gives comparable information to that obtainable by the multiple tube test before accepting it as an alternative. The fecal coliform MF procedure uses an enriched lactose medium and incubation temperature of 44.5 ± 0.2 ° C for selectivity. Because incubation temperature is critical, submerge waterproofed ( plastic bag enclosures) MF cultures in a water bath for incubation at the elevated temperature or use an appropriate solid heat sink incubator or other incubator that is documented to hold the 44.5 ° C temperature within 0.2 ° C throughout the chamber, over a 24 h period. Areas of application for the fecal coliform method in general are stated in the introduction to the multiple tube fecal coliform procedures, Section 9221E.

1. Materials and Culture Medium a. M FC medium: The need for uniformity dictates the use of dehydrated media. Never prepare media from basic ingredients when suitable dehydrated media are available. Follow manufacturer's directions for rehydration. Commercially prepared media in liquid form ( sterile ampule or other) also may be used if known to give equivalent results. See Section 9020 for quality control specifications.

M FC medium:

Tryptose or biosate............................................ 10.0 g Proteose peptone No. 3 or polypeptone.............. 5.0 g Yeast extract.................................................... .. 3.0 g Sodium chloride, NaCl........................................ 5.0 g Lactose............................................................. 12.5 g Bile salts No. 3 or bile salts mixture................... 1.5 g Aniline blue......................................................... 0.1 g Agar ( optional).................................................. 15.0 g Reagent grade water......................................... .. 1.0 L Rehydrate product in 1 L water containing 10 mL 1% rosolic acid in 0.2N NaOH. 3 Heat to near boiling, promptly remove from heat, and cool to below 50 ° C. Do not sterilize by autoclaving. If agar is used, dispense 5 to 7 mL quantities to 50 × 12 mm petri plates and let solidify. Final pH should be 7.4 ± 0.2. Refrigerate finished medium, preferably in sealed plastic bags or other containers to reduce moisture loss, and discard unused broth after 96 h or unused agar after 2 weeks. Test each medium lot against a previously acceptable lot for satisfactory performance as described in Section 9020B, by making dilutions of a culture of E. coli ( Section 9020) and filtering appropriate volumes to give 20 to 60 colonies per filter. With each new lot of medium verify 10 or more colonies obtained from several natural samples, to establish the absence of false positives. For most samples M FC medium may be used without the 1% rosolic acid addition, provided there is no interference with background growth. Such interference may be expected in stormwater samples collected during the first runoff ( initial flushing) after a long dry period. Before use, test each batch of laboratory prepared MF medium for performance with positive and Draft 7 June 2003 negative culture controls. Check for coliform contamination at the beginning and end of each filtration series by filtering 20 to 30 mL of dilution or rinse water through filter. If controls indicate contamination, reject all data from affected samples and request resample.

b. Culture dishes: Tight fitting plastic dishes are preferred because the membrane filter cultures are submerged in a water bath during incubation. Place fecal coliform cultures in plastic bags or seal individual dishes with waterproof ( freezer) tape to prevent leakage during submersion. Specifications for plastic culture dishes are given in Section 9222B. 1e.

c. Incubator: The specificity of the fecal coliform test is related directly to the incubation temperature. Static air incubation may be a problem in some types of incubators because of potential heat layering within the chamber, slower heat transfer from air to the medium, and the slow recovery of temperature each time the incubator is opened during daily operations. To meet the need for greater temperature control use a water bath, a heat sink incubator, or a properly designed and constructed incubator shown to give equivalent results. A temperature tolerance of 44.5 ± 0.2 ° C can be obtained with most types of water baths that also are equipped with a gable top for the reduction of water and heat losses.

2. Procedure a. Selection of sample size: Select volume of water sample to be examined in accordance with the information in Table 9222: III. Use sample volumes that will yield counts between 20 and 60 fecal coliform colonies per membrane. When the bacterial density of the sample is unknown, filter several volumes or dilutions to achieve a countable density. Estimate volume and/ or dilution expected to yield a countable membrane and select two additional quantities representing onetenth and ten times this volume, respectively.

b. Filtration of sample: Follow the same procedure and precautions as prescribed under Section 9222B. 5b above.

c. Preparation of culture dish: Place a sterile absorbent pad in each culture dish and pipet at least 2.0 mL M FC medium, prepared as directed above, to saturate pad. Carefully remove any excess liquid from culture dish by decanting the plate. Aseptically, place prepared filter on mediumimpregnated pad as described in Section 9222B above. As a substrate substitution for the nutrient saturated absorbent pad, add 1.5% agar to M FC broth as described in Section 9222B above.

d. Incubation: Place prepared dishes in waterproof plastic bags or seal, invert, and submerge petri dishes in water bath, and incubate for 24 ± 2 h at 44.5 ± 0.2 ° C. Anchor dishes below water surface to maintain critical temperature requirements. Place all prepared cultures in the water bath within 30 min after filtration. Alternatively, use an appropriate, accurate solid heat sink or equivalent incubator.

e. Counting: Colonies produced by fecal coliform bacteria on M FC medium are various shades of blue. Nonfecal coliform colonies are gray to cream colored. Normally, few nonfecal coliform colonies will be observed on M FC medium because of selective action of the elevated temperature and addition of rosolic acid salt reagent. Count colonies with a low power ( 10 to 15 magnifications) binocular wide field dissecting microscope or other optical device. Draft 8 June 2003 f. Verification: Verify typical blue colonies and any atypical grey to green colonies as described in Section 9020 for fecal coliform analysis. Simultaneous inoculation at both temperatures is acceptable. Draft 9 June 2003 3. Bibliography Geldreich, E. E., H. F. Clark, C. B. Huff & L. C. Best. 1965. Fecal coliform organism medium for the membrane filter technique. J. Amer. Water Works Assoc. 57: 208.

Rose, R. E., E. E. Geldreich & W. Litsky. 1975. Improved membrane filter method for fecal coliform analysis. Appl. Microbiol. 29: 532.

Lin, S. D. 1976. Membrane filter method for recovery of fecal coliforms in chlorinated sewage effluents. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 32: 547.

Presswood, W. G. & D. K. Strong. 1978. Modification of M FC medium by eliminating rosolic acid. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 36: 90.

Green, B. L., W. Litsky & K. J. Sladek. 1980. Evaluation of membrane filter methods for enumeration of faecal coliforms from marine waters. Mar. Environ. Res. 67: 267.

Sartory, D. P. 1980. Membrane filtration faecal coliform determinations with unmodified and modified MFC medium. Water SA 6: 113.

Grabow, W. O. K., C. A. Hilner & P. Coubrough. 1981. Evaluation of standard and modified M FC, MacConkey, and Teepol media for membrane filter counting of fecal coliform in water. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 42: 192.

Rychert, R. C. & G. R. Stephenson. 1981. Atypical Escherichia coli in streams. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 41: 1276.

Pagel, J. E., A. A. Qureshi, D. M. Young & L. T. Vlassoff. 1982. Comparison of four membrane filter methods for fecal coliform enumeration. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 43: 787.

U. S. Environmental Protection Agency. 1992. Environmental Regulations and Technology. Control of Pathogens and Vector Attraction in Sewage Sludge. EPA 626/ R 92 013, Washington, D. C.

U. S. Environmental Protection Agency. 1993. Standards for the Use or Disposal of Sewage Sludge: Final Rule. 40 CFR Part 257; Federal Register 58: 9248, Feb. 19, 1993. Draft 10 June 2003 9222 G. MF PARTITION PROCEDURES ESCHERICHIA COLI PARTITION METHODS Escherichia coli is a member of the fecal coliform group of bacteria; its presence is indicative of fecal contamination. Rapid quantitation and verification may be achieved with the MF procedure by transferring the membrane from a total coliform or fecal coliform positive sample to a nutrient agar substrate containing 4 methylumbelliferyl$ D glucuronide ( MUG). In this method E. coli is defined as any coliform that produces the enzyme $ glucuronidase and hydrolyzes the MUG substrate to produce a blue fluorescence around the periphery of the colony. In the examination of drinking water samples, use this method to verify the presence of E. coli from a total coliform positive MF on Endo type media. In the examination of wastewater and other nonpotable water samples, use this procedure to verify positive filters from mFC medium used in the fecal coliform MF procedure.

1. Laboratory Apparatus a. Culture dishes: See Section 9222B. 1e.

b. Filtration units: See Section 9222B. 1f.

c. Forceps: See Section 9222B. 1i.

d. Incubator: See Section 9222B. 1j.

e. Ultraviolet lamp, long wave ( 366 nm), preferably 6 W.

f. Microscope and light source: See Section 9222B. 1 k.

2. Materials and Culture Media a. Nutrient agar with MUG ( NA MUG): Peptone................................................................ 5.0 g Beef extract.......................................................... 3.0 g Agar................................................................... 15.0 g 4 methylumbelliferyl$ D glucuronide............... 0.1 g Reagent grade water............................................... 1 L Add dehydrated ingredients to reagent grade water, mix thoroughly, and heat to dissolve. Sterilize by autoclaving for 15 min at 121 ° C. Dispense aseptically into 50 mm plastic culture plates. The final pH should be 6.8 ± 0.2. Refrigerated prepared medium may be held for 2 weeks.

b. EC broth with MUG ( EC MUG): Tryptose or trypticase........................................ 20.0 g Lactose.............................................................. .5.0 g Bile salts mixture or bile salts No....................... 31.5 g Dipotassium hydrogen phosphate, K2HPO4..... .... 4.0 g Potassium dihydrogen phosphate, KH2PO4........... 1.4 g Sodium chloride, NaCl........................................ .5.0 g 4 methylumbelliferyl$ D glucuronide................. 0.1 g Reagent grade water........................................... .. 1 L Draft 11 June 2003 Add dehydrated ingredients to reagent grade water, mix thoroughly and heat to dissolve. pH should be 6.9 ± 0.2 after sterilization. Before sterilization, dispense into culture tubes and cap with metal or heat resistant plastic caps.

3. Procedures a. Selection of sample size: See Section 9222B. 5 for selection of sample size and filtration procedure.

For drinking water samples using Endo type medium, count and record the metallic golden sheen colonies. Before transfer of the membrane, transfer a small portion of each target colony to the appropriate total coliform verification medium, using a sterile needle. See Section 9222B. 5 for total coliform verification procedures.

b. Alternative coliform verifications: After transfer and incubation on NA MUG, swab the surface growth on the filter and transfer to the appropriate total coliform verification medium. Aseptically transfer the membrane from the Endo type medium to NA MUG or EC MUG medium. If differentiation of the total coliforms is desired using NA MUG medium, mark each sheen colony with a fine tipped marker or by puncturing a hole in the membrane adjacent to the colony with a sterile needle. Incubate NA MUG at 35 ± 0.5 ° C for 4 h or EC MUG at 44.5 ± 0.2 for 24 ± 2 h. Observe individual colonies or tubes using a long wave length ( 366 nm) ultraviolet light source, preferably containing a 6 W bulb. The presence of a blue fluorescence in the tube, on the periphery ( outer edge) of a colony, or observed from the back of the plate is considered a positive response for E. coli. Count and record the number of target colonies, if quantification is desired, or just record presence or absence of fluorescence.

For nonpotable water samples, use mFC medium for initial isolation before transfer to NA MUG or EC MUG medium. The procedure is the same as the above, with the exception of the total coliform verification process.

For the EC MUG method, a positive control consisting of a known E. coli ( MUG positive) culture, a negative control consisting of a thermotolerant Klebsiella pneumoniae ( MUG negative) culture, and an uninoculated medium control may be necessary to interpret the results and to avoid confusion of weak autofluorescence of the medium as a positive response. See Section 9221F. Draft 12 June 2003 4. Bibliography U. S. Environmental Protection Agency. 1989. Drinking Water; National Primary Drinking Water Regulations; Total Coliforms ( Including Fecal Coliforms and E. coli); Final Rule. 40 CFR Parts 141 and 142. Federal Register 54: 27544. June 29, 1989.

Mates, A. & M. Schaffer. 1989. Membrane Filtration Differentiation of E. coli from Coliforms in the Examination of Water. J. Appl. Bacteriol. 67: 343.

U. S. Environmental Protection Agency. 1991. National Primary Drinking Water Regulations; Analytical Techniques; Coliform Bacteria. 40 CFR Part 141, Federal Register 56: 636. Jan 8, 1991.

Mates, A. & M. Schaffer. 1992. Quantitative Determination of Escherichia coli from Coliforms and Fecal Coliforms in Sea Water. Microbios. 71: 27.

Sartory, D. & L. Howard. 1992. A Medium Detecting beta glucuronidase for the Simultaneous Membrane Filtration enumeration of Escherichia coli and Coliforms from Drinking Water. Lett. Appl. Microbiol. 15: 273.

Shadix, L. C., M. E. Dunnigan & E. W. Rice. 1993. Detection of Escherichia coli by the Nutrient Agar plus 4 methylumbelliferyl D glucuronide ( MUG) Membrane Filter Method. Can. J. Microbiol. 39: 1066.


[Federal Register Volume 80, Number 115 (Tuesday, June 16, 2015)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Page 34315]
[FR Doc No: 2015-14715]

=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY

Coast Guard

33 CFR Part 117

[Docket No. USCG-2015-0479]

Drawbridge Operation Regulation; Pearl River, LA/MS

AGENCY: Coast Guard, DHS.

ACTION: Notice of deviation from drawbridge regulations.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Coast Guard has issued a temporary deviation from the
operating schedule that governs the operation of the US 90 highway
bridge (East Pearl River Bridge), a swing span bridge across the Pearl
River, mile 8.8 between Slidell, St. Tammany Parish, Louisiana and
Pearlington, Hancock County, Mississippi. The deviation is necessary in
order to conduct electrical and structural repairs to the bridge. This
deviation will allow the bridge to remain in the closed-to-navigation
position for four consecutive days.

DATES: This deviation is effective from 7 a.m. on Monday, July 20,
2015, through 7 p.m. on Friday, July 24, 2015.

ADDRESSES: Documents mentioned in this preamble are part of docket
[USCG-2015-0479]. To view documents mentioned in this preamble as being
available in the docket, go to http://www.regulations.gov, type the
docket number (USCG-2015-0479) in the ``SEARCH'' box and click
``SEARCH.'' Click on Open Docket Folder on the line associated with
this rulemaking. You may also visit the Docket Management Facility in
Room W12-140 on the ground floor of the Department of Transportation
West Building, 1200 New Jersey Avenue SE., Washington, DC 20590,
between 9 a.m. and 5 p.m., Monday through Friday, except Federal
holidays.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: If you have questions on this
temporary deviation, call or email Mr. Jim Wetherington, Bridge
Administration Branch, Coast Guard; telephone<PHONE_NUMBER>, email
<EMAIL_ADDRESS>If you have questions on viewing the docket, call
Cheryl Collins, Program Manager, Docket Operations, telephone 202-366-
9826.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Boh Bros. Construction Company, on behalf of
the Louisiana Department of Transportation and Development, requested a
temporary deviation from the operating schedule on the US 90 highway
bridge (East Pearl River Bridge), a swing span bridge across the Pearl
River, mile 8.8 between Slidell, St. Tammany Parish, Louisiana and
Pearlington, Hancock County, Mississippi. The bridge has a vertical
clearance of 10 feet above mean high water in the closed-to-navigation
position and unlimited clearance in the open-to-navigation position.
    Navigation at the site of the bridge consists mainly of small tows
with barges, some commercial sightseeing boats, and some recreational
pleasure craft. Based on prior experience, as well as coordination with
waterway users, it has been determined that this closure will not have
a significant effect on these vessels. No alternate routes are
available.
    In accordance with 33 CFR 117.486(b), the draw of the US 90 highway
bridge shall open on signal; except that, from 7 p.m. to 7 a.m. the
draw shall open on signal if at least four hours notice is given.
Vessels that do not require an opening will be allowed to pass at the
slowest safe speed. The bridge will be unable to open in the event of
an emergency.
    The closure is necessary for the replacement of structural and
electrical components of the draw span and two submarine cables. These
operations will continue until completed and will not allow the normal
operation of the bridge. Normal operations of the bridge will commence
upon completion of the work. Notices will be published in the Eighth
Coast Guard District Local Notice to Mariners and will be broadcast via
the Coast Guard Broadcast Notice to Mariners System.
    In accordance with 33 CFR 117.35(e), the drawbridge must return to
its regular operating schedule immediately at the end of the effective
period of this temporary deviation. This deviation from the operating
regulations is authorized under 33 CFR 117.35.

    Dated: June 11, 2015.
David M. Frank,
Bridge Administrator, Eighth Coast Guard District.
[FR Doc. 2015-14715 Filed 6-15-15; 8:45 am]
 BILLING CODE 9110-04-P


			  UNITED STATES OF AMERICA

		        DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION

			  OFFICE OF THE SECRETARY

			          WASHINGTON, D.C.

Issued by the Department of Transportation on May 19, 2004

NOTICE OF ACTION TAKEN -- DOCKET OST 2004-17906

________________________________________________________________________
________________________________________________________

This serves as notice to the public of the action described below, taken
by the Department official indicated (no additional confirming order
will be issued in this matter).

Applicant:  ANTONOV DESIGN BUREAU
                                Date Filed:  May 19, 2004

Relief requested:  Exemption from 49 U.S.C. section 40109(g) to permit
the applicant to operate one, one-way, cargo charter flight from
Dallas/Ft. Worth, Texas, to Miami, Florida, during the period May 19-20,
2004, using its AN-124-100 aircraft to transport one Boeing 777 aircraft
engine, plus ancillary equipment, on behalf of Rolls Royce and American
Airlines.  The applicant stated that American Airlines requires delivery
of the engine as soon as possible to repair one of its aircraft at
Miami, and to return that aircraft to scheduled service; that the cargo
is too large for transportation on U.S.-carrier aircraft; and that
surface transportation is not feasible because of the large size of the
cargo and of the long time period that such mode of transportation would
take.

Applicant representative:  Sheryl R. Israel,<PHONE_NUMBER>            DOT
analyst:  Allen F. Brown,<PHONE_NUMBER>

Responsive pleadings:  Antonov Design Bureau served its application on
those U.S. carriers operating large all-cargo aircraft.  Each carrier
indicated that it did not have aircraft available to conduct the
proposed operations and that it had no comment or did not oppose grant
of the requested authority to Polet Airlines.

Statutory Standards:  Under 49 U.S.C. section 40109(g), we may authorize
a foreign air carrier to carry commercial traffic between U.S. points
(i.e., cabotage traffic) under limited circumstances.  Specifically, we
must find that the authority is required in the public interest; that
because of an emergency created by unusual circumstances not arising in
the normal course of business the traffic cannot be accommodated by U.S.
carriers holding certificates under 49 U.S.C. section 41102; that all
possible efforts have been made to place the traffic on U.S. carriers;
and that the transportation is necessary to avoid unreasonable hardship
to the traffic involved (an additional required finding, concerning
emergency transportation during labor disputes, was not relevant here).

        DISPOSITION

Action: Approved
                                               Action date:  May 19,
2004

Effective dates of authority granted:  May 19, 2004, through May 20,
2004.

Basis for approval:  We are granting the request of Antonov Design
Bureau to operate its proposed flight from Dallas/Ft. Worth to Miami,
through May 20, 2004.  We found that its request met all the relevant
criteria of 49 U.S.C. section 40109(g) for the grant of an exemption of
this type and that the grant was required in the public interest.
Specifically, we were persuaded of the need to move the engine promptly
in order to meet American Airlines’ urgent repair schedule, the fact
that the cargo could not be transported by surface transportation
because of the long time period such movement would take, the potential
negative impact of delivery delay; and the unique, outsized nature of
the cargo, constituted an emergency not arising in the normal course of
business.  Moreover, based on the representations of the U.S. carriers,
we concluded that no U.S. carrier had aircraft available which could be
used to conduct the operation at issue here.  We also found that grant
of this authority was necessary to prevent unreasonable hardship to
Rolls Royce and American Airlines.  Finally, we found that the applicant
was qualified to perform its proposed operation.

Except to the extent exempted/waived, this authority is subject to our
standard exemption conditions and to the condition that the applicant
must comply with an FAA-approved flight routing for the authorized
flight.

Action taken by:         Karan K. Bhatia

                                    Assistant Secretary

                       for Aviation and International Affairs

An electronic version of this document is available on the World Wide
Web at:

http://dms.dot.gov//reports/reports_aviation.asp


[Federal Register Volume 80, Number 142 (Friday, July 24, 2015)]
[Notices]
[Pages 44194-44195]
[FR Doc No: 2015-18211]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

 DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION

Intelligent Transportation Systems Program Advisory Committee;
Notice of Meeting

AGENCY: ITS Joint Program Office, Office of the Assistant Secretary for
Research and Technology, U.S. Department of Transportation.

ACTION: Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

    The Intelligent Transportation Systems (ITS) Program Advisory
Committee (ITSPAC) will hold a meeting on August 13, 2015, from 8:00
a.m. to 4:00 p.m. (EDT) in the Crystal City Marriott at Reagan National
Airport, 1999 Jefferson Davis Highway, Arlington, VA 22202.
    The ITSPAC, established under Section 5305 of Public Law 109-59,
Safe, Accountable, Flexible, Efficient Transportation Equity Act: A
Legacy for Users, August 10, 2005, and re-established under Section
53003 of Public Law 112-141, Moving Ahead for Progress in the 21st
Century, July 6, 2012, was created to advise the Secretary of
Transportation on all matters relating to the study, development, and
implementation of intelligent transportation systems. Through its
sponsor, the ITS Joint Program Office (JPO), the ITSPAC makes
recommendations to the Secretary regarding ITS Program needs,
objectives, plans, approaches, content, and progress.
    The following is a summary of the meeting tentative agenda: (1)
Welcome Remarks, (2) Opening Remarks, (3) Update on Key Issues at ITS
JPO, (4) Guest Presentation, (5) Subcommittee Meetings, (6)
Subcommittee Updates to

Committee, and (7) Discussion of Action Items and Next Meeting.
    The meeting will be open to the public, but limited space will be
available on a first-come, first-served basis. Members of the public
who wish to present oral statements at the meeting must submit a
request to<EMAIL_ADDRESS>not later than August 6, 2015.
    Questions about the agenda or written comments may be submitted by
U.S. Mail to: U.S. Department of Transportation, Office of the
Assistant Secretary for Research and Technology, ITS Joint Program
Office, Attention: Stephen Glasscock, 1200 New Jersey Avenue SE., HOIT,
Washington, DC 20590 or faxed to<PHONE_NUMBER>. The ITS JPO requests
that written comments be submitted not later than August 6, 2015.
    Notice of this meeting is provided in accordance with the Federal
Advisory Committee Act and the General Services Administration
regulations (41 CCFR 102-3) covering management of Federal advisory
committees.

    Issued in Washington, DC, on the 21st day of July 2015.
Stephen Glasscock,
Designated Federal Official, ITS Joint Program Office.
[FR Doc. 2015-18211 Filed 7-23-15; 8:45 am]
 BILLING CODE 4910-22-P


UNITED STATES ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY OFFICE OF AIR QUALITY PLANNING AND STANDARDS EMISSION STANDARDS DIVISION RESEARCH TRIANGLE PARK, NC 27711 February 11, 2004 MEMORANDUM SUBJECT: Screening Assessment of Acid Gas and Respiratory HAP from Coal Fired Industrial Boilers FROM: Scott Jenkins Risk and Exposure Assessment Group ( C404 01)

TO: David E. Guinnup, Leader Risk and Exposure Assessment Group ( C404 01)

Introduction The EPA performed a screening assessment to evaluate acute and chronic non cancer risks due to emissions of acid gas and respiratory HAP from uncontrolled coal fired industrial boilers. This document describes the results of that screening assessment.

Methods The present analysis utilized the SCREEN3 model with characteristic defaults where data were not available. Engineering judgment was used to develop plant parameters ( Table 1) and emission rates ( Table 2) for three different sized model facilities within the Large Solid Fuel Fired Boiler subcategory. All acid gas and respiratory HAP for which emission rates from coal fired boilers are available were evaluated. The range of predicted HAP concentrations was determined by using the plant parameters listed in table 1 and the emission rates listed in table 2. Acute and chronic toxicity dose response values were taken from the EPA Air Toxics website ( http:// www. epa. gov/ ttn/ atw/ toxsource/ summary. html) as of 10/ 01/ 03. For HAP with more than one acute dose response value, the most health protective was chosen. Health protective assumptions were made for model input parameters where data were lacking. The rural dispersion option was chosen and the emission source was assumed to be a point source. The default ambient air temperature ( 293 K) was used and the receptor height was 0 m. The full worst case meteorology default was chosen. Building downwash was not expected to be significant for these sources, and therefore was not calculated. Simple, flat terrain was assumed and the automated distance option was chosen with measurement points between 100 m and 50,000 m. The maximum predicted pollutant concentration occurred beyond 100 m for all three model facilities. 2 Table 1. Plant Parameters Used for Screen3 Modeling Parameter Large Facility Parameters Medium sized Facility Parameters Small Facility Parameters Stack Height ( m) 70 15 37.5 Stack Diameter ( m) 3.0 1.0 2.0 Stack Gas Exit Velocity ( m/ s) 8.5 22 13.6 Stack Gas Exit Temp. ( K) 485 425.5 425.5 Table 2. Typical Uncontrolled HAP Emission Rates ( g/ s) HAP Large Facility Medium Facility Small Facility HCl 4.00E+ 00 1.10E+ 00 7.00E 02 HF* 2.90E 01 8.00E 02 5.00E 03 Cl2 1.56E+ 00 4.30E 01 2.60E 02 Acrolein 2.30E 03 6.40E 04 4.00E 05 Vinyl Acetate 1.73E 05 4.80E 06 3.00E 07 Toluene 1.35E 03 3.76E 04 2.35E 05 n Hexane 2.13E 04 5.92E 05 3.70E 06 Nickel 1.84E 02 5.12E 03 3.20E 04 Antimony 5.76E 04 1.60E 04 1.00E 05 Beryllium 1.15E 03 3.20E 04 2.00E 05 Chromium VI 2.30E 04 6.40E 05 4.00E 06 * The critical effect for HF toxicity is skeletal fluorosis, but HF was included in the present analysis because it is an acid gas emitted by these boiler facilities.

Results Table 3 lists the maximum predicted acute HAP concentrations and their corresponding hazard quotient values for coal fired plants. Hazard quotient values were calculated by dividing the maximum predicted 1 hour HAP concentration by the appropriate dose response value ( see methods). The maximum acute hazard quotient value is 0.08.

Table 3. Predicted Acute HAP concentrations and HQ Values HAP Large Facility Max Predicted [ ] µ g/ m3 Medium Facility Max Predicted [ ] µ g/ m3 Small Facility Max Predicted [ ] µ g/ m3 Doseresponse value µ g/ m3 Large Facility HQ Medium Facility HQ Small Facility HQ HCl 1.06E+ 01 1.45E+ 01 3.43E 01 2100 5.05E 03 6.89E 03 1.63E 04 HF 7.68E 01 1.05E+ 00 2.45E 02 25 3.07E 02 4.21E 02 9.80E 04 Cl2 4.13E+ 00 5.66E+ 00 1.27E 01 210 1.97E 02 2.69E 02 6.07E 04 Acrolein 6.10E 03 8.42E 03 1.96E 04 0.11 5.55E 02 7.66E 02 1.78E 03 3 Vinyl Acetate 4.58E 05 6.32E 05 1.47E 06 18000 2.54E 09 3.51E 09 8.17E 11 Toluene 3.59E 03 4.95E 03 1.15E 04 3800 9.44E 07 1.30E 06 3.03E 08 n Hexane 5.65E 04 7.79E 04 1.81E 05 390000 1.45E 09 2.00E 09 4.65E 11 Nickel 4.88E 02 6.74E 02 1.57E 03 6 8.14E 03 1.12E 02 2.61E 04 Antimony 1.53E 03 2.11E 03 4.90E 05 5000 3.05E 07 4.21E 07 9.80E 09 Beryllium 3.05E 03 4.21E 03 9.80E 05 25 1.22E 04 1.68E 04 3.92E 06 Chromium VI 6.10E 04 8.42E 04 1.96E 05 1500 4.07E 07 5.61E 07 1.31E 08 Table 4 lists the maximum predicted chronic HAP concentrations and their corresponding hazard quotient values for coal fired plants. Hazard quotient values were calculated by dividing the maximum predicted chronic HAP concentration by the RfC or other appropriate dose response value. The hazard quotient for Cl2 is the only hazard quotient that exceeds 1.0. All other hazard quotients are insignificant. A total hazard index was calculated by summing all of the hazard quotients. The total hazard index values are 1.8 ( large), 2.4 ( medium), and 0.05 ( small). Without Cl2, the hazard index values fall to 0.10 ( large), 0.14 ( medium), and 0.003 ( small).

Table 4. Predicted Chronic HAP Concentrations and HQ Values HAP Large Facility Max Predicted [ ] µ g/ m3 Medium Facility Max Predicted [ ] µ g/ m3 Small Facility Max Predicted [ ] µ g/ m3 Doseresponse value ( µ g/ m3) Large Facility HQ Medium Facility HQ Small Facility HQ HCl 8.48E 01 1.16E+ 00 2.74E 02 20 4.24E 02 5.79E 02 1.37E 03 HF 6.15E 02 8.42E 02 1.96E 03 30 2.05E 03 2.81E 03 6.53E 05 Cl2 3.31E 01 4.53E 01 1.02E 02 0.2 1.65E+ 00 2.26E+ 00 5.09E 02 Acrolein 4.88E 04 6.74E 04 1.57E 05 0.02 2.44E 02 3.37E 02 7.84E 04 Vinyl Acetate 3.66E 06 5.05E 06 1.18E 07 200 1.83E 08 2.53E 08 5.88E 10 Toluene 2.87E 04 3.96E 04 9.21E 06 400 7.17E 07 9.90E 07 2.30E 08 n Hexane 4.52E 05 6.23E 05 1.45E 06 200 2.26E 07 3.12E 07 7.25E 09 Nickel 3.91E 03 5.39E 03 1.25E 04 0.2 1.95E 02 2.70E 02 6.27E 04 Antimony 1.22E 04 1.68E 04 3.92E 06 0.2 6.10E 04 8.42E 04 1.96E 05 Beryllium 2.44E 04 3.37E 04 7.84E 06 0.02 1.22E 02 1.68E 02 3.92E 04 Chromium VI 4.88E 05 6.74E 05 1.57E 06 0.1 4.88E 04 6.74E 04 1.57E 05 OAQPS: ESD: REAG: SJenkins: bmiles: x5648: C404 01: 2/ 25/ 04 Draft Document 4