[Federal Register Volume 83, Number 26 (Wednesday, February 7, 2018)]
[Notices]
[Pages 5473-5474]
[FR Doc No: 2018-02393]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

[Release No. 34-82611; File No. SR-Phlx-2017-103]

Self-Regulatory Organizations; Nasdaq PHLX LLC; Order Approving a
Proposed Rule Change To Expand the Short Term Option Series Program To
Allow Monday Expirations for SPY Options

February 1, 2018.

I. Introduction

    On December 6, 2017, the Nasdaq PHLX LLC (``Phlx'' or ``Exchange'')
filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (``Commission''),
pursuant to Section 19(b)(1) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934
(``Act'') \1\ and Rule 19b-4 thereunder,\2\ a proposed rule change to
amend Rule 1000 and Commentary .11 to Rule 1012 to expand the Short
Term Option Series Program to permit listing and trading of options on
the SPDR S&P 500 ETF Trust (``SPY'') with Monday expirations. The
proposed rule change was published for comment in the Federal Register
on December 26, 2017.\3\ The Commission received no comments on the
proposal. This order approves the proposed rule change.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \1\ 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(1).
    \2\ 17 CFR 240.19b-4.
    \3\ See Securities Exchange Act Release No. 82363 (December 19,
2017), 82 FR 61047 (December 26, 2017) (``Notice'').
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

II. Description of the Proposal

    Under the terms of the current Short Term Option Series Program,
after an option class has been approved for listing and trading on the
Exchange, the Exchange may open for trading on any Thursday or Friday
that is a business day series of options on that class that expire on
each of the next five Fridays, provided that such Friday is not a
Friday in which monthly options series or Quarterly Options Series
expire.\4\ In addition, the Exchange may open for trading on any
Tuesday or Wednesday that is a business day series of options on SPY to
expire on up to five consecutive Wednesdays, provided that each such
Wednesday is a business day and is not a Wednesday in which Quarterly
Options Series expire.\5\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \4\ See Commentary .11 to Phlx Rule 1012.
    \5\ See id.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    The Exchange proposes to expand the Short Term Option Series to
permit Phlx to open for trading, on any Monday or Friday that is a
business day, series of options on SPY that expire on any Monday of the
month that is a business day and is not a Monday in which Quarterly
Options Series expires (``Monday SPY Expirations'').\6\ In the case of
a series that is listed on a Friday and expires on a Monday, it must be
listed one business week and one business day prior to that Monday
expiration.\7\ If the Monday SPY Expirations falls on a Monday that is
not a business day, the series shall expire on the first business day
immediately following that Monday.\8\ The Exchange also proposes to
amend Commentary .11 to Phlx Rule 1012 state that it may list up to
five consecutive Monday SPY Expirations at one time, and may have no
more than a total of five Monday SPY Expirations (in addition to a
maximum of five Short Term Option Series for SPY expiring on Friday and
five Wednesday SPY Expirations). In addition, like Wednesday SPY
Expirations and unlike other option series in the Short Term Option
Series program, Monday SPY Expirations could expire in the same week in
which monthly option series in the same class expire.\9\ Otherwise,
Monday SPY Expirations are subject to the same rules as standard Short
Term Option Series.\10\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \6\ Under the proposal, the Exchange would expand the definition
of ``Short Term Option Series'' in Phlx Rule 1044(b)(44) and add a
description of Monday SPY Expirations to Commentary .11 to Phlx Rule
1012. See Notice, supra note 3, at 61048.
    \7\ See proposed Commentary .11 to Phlx Rule 1012.
    \8\ See proposed Phlx Rule 1000(b)(44).
    \9\ See proposed Commentary .11 to Phlx Rule 1012.
    \10\ For example, Monday SPY Expirations would be subject to the
same series limitations and strike interval rules as standard Short
Term Option Series. See Notice, supra note 3, at 61048.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

III. Discussion and Commission's Findings

    The Commission has carefully reviewed the proposed rule change and
finds that it is consistent with the requirements of the Act and the
rules and regulations thereunder applicable to a national securities
exchange and, in particular, the requirements of Section 6(b) of the
Act.\11\ Specifically, the Commission finds that the proposal is
consistent with the requirements of Sections 6(b)(5) of the Act,\12\
which requires, among other things, that a national securities exchange
have rules designed to prevent fraudulent and manipulative acts and
practices, to promote just and equitable principles of trade, to foster
cooperation and coordination with persons engaged in

regulating, clearing, settling, processing information with respect to,
and facilitating transactions in securities, to remove impediments to
and perfect the mechanism of a free and open market and a national
market system, and in general, to protect investors and the public
interest. The Commission believes that the proposed rule change may
provide the investing public and other market participants more
flexibility to closely tailor their investment and hedging decisions in
SPY options, thus allowing them to better manage their risk exposure.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \11\ 15 U.S.C. 78f. In approving this proposed rule change, the
Commission has considered the proposed rule change's impact on
efficiency, competition, and capital formation. See 15 U.S.C.
78c(f).
    \12\ 15 U.S.C. 78f(b)(5).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    In approving the proposal, the Commission notes that the Exchange
has represented that it has an adequate surveillance program in place
to detect manipulative trading in Monday SPY Expirations.\13\ The
Exchange further states that it has the necessary systems capacity to
support the new options series.\14\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \13\ See Notice, supra note 3, at 61049.
    \14\ Id.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

IV. Conclusion

    It is therefore ordered that pursuant to Section 19(b)(2) of the
Act \15\ that the proposed rule change (SR-Phlx-2017-103) be, and
hereby is, approved.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \15\ 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(2).
    \16\ 17 CFR 200.30-3(a)(12).

    For the Commission, by the Division of Trading and Markets,
pursuant to delegated authority.\16\
Eduardo A. Aleman,
Assistant Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2018-02393 Filed 2-6-18; 8:45 am]
 BILLING CODE 8011-01-P


[Federal Register Volume 78, Number 213 (Monday, November 4, 2013)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Pages 65871-65872]
[FR Doc No: 2013-26052]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION

Federal Aviation Administration

14 CFR Part 39

[Docket No. FAA-2013-0479; Directorate Identifier 2011-SW-070-AD;
Amendment 39-17649; AD 2013-22-17]
RIN 2120-AA64

Airworthiness Directives; Eurocopter France Helicopters

AGENCY: Federal Aviation Administration (FAA), DOT.

ACTION: Final rule.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: We are adopting a new airworthiness directive (AD) for
Eurocopter France (Eurocopter) Model AS332C, AS332L, AS332L1, AS332L2,
and EC225LP helicopters. This AD requires inspecting the intermediate
gearbox (IGB) fairing for a crack and inspecting the IGB fairing gutter
(gutter), if installed, for a crack, separation, or interference. This
AD is prompted by reports of cracks, separation of the IGB fairing from
the gutter and attachment supports, and subsequent interference with
the tail rotor (T/R) inclined drive shaft. These actions are intended
to detect a crack and prevent separation of the IGB fairing, which
could result in interference with the T/R inclined drive shaft and
subsequent loss of control of the helicopter.

DATES: This AD is effective December 9, 2013.

ADDRESSES: For service information identified in this AD, contact
American Eurocopter Corporation, 2701 N. Forum Drive, Grand Prairie, TX
75052; telephone<PHONE_NUMBER> or<PHONE_NUMBER>; fax<PHONE_NUMBER>;
or at http://www.eurocopter.com/techpub. You may review the referenced
service information at the FAA, Office of the Regional Counsel,
Southwest Region, 2601 Meacham Blvd., Room 663, Fort Worth, Texas
76137.

Examining the AD Docket

    You may examine the AD docket on the Internet at http://www.regulations.gov or in person at the Docket Operations Office
between 9 a.m. and 5 p.m., Monday through Friday, except Federal
holidays. The AD docket contains this AD, the foreign authority's AD,
the economic evaluation, any comments received, and other information.
The street address for the Docket Operations Office (phone: 800-647-
5527) is U.S. Department of Transportation, Docket Operations Office,
M-30, West Building Ground Floor, Room W12-140, 1200 New Jersey Avenue
SE., Washington, DC 20590.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Gary Roach, Aviation Safety Engineer,
Regulations and Policy Group, Rotorcraft Directorate, FAA, 2601 Meacham
Blvd., Fort Worth, Texas 76137; telephone<PHONE_NUMBER>; email
<EMAIL_ADDRESS>
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

Discussion

    On June 5, 2013, at 78 FR 33764, the Federal Register published our
notice of proposed rulemaking (NPRM), which proposed to amend 14 CFR
part 39 to include an AD that would apply to Eurocopter Model AS332C,
AS332L, AS332L1, AS332L2, and EC225LP helicopters with an intermediate
gearbox (IGB) fairing, part number (P/N) 332A24-0303-0501, P/N 332A24-
0303-0601, P/N 332A081391.00, or P/N 332A081391.01 installed. The NPRM
proposed to require, for helicopters with an IGB fairing with a gutter,
repetitively inspecting the gutter, IGB fairing, and attachment
supports for a crack, separation, or interference. For helicopters with
an IGB fairing without a gutter, the NPRM proposed to require
repetitively inspecting the IGB fairing and attachment supports for a
crack. If during any inspection there is a crack, interference, or
separation, the NPRM proposed replacing the cracked or damaged part
with an airworthy part. The proposed requirements were intended to
detect a crack and prevent separation of the IGB fairing, which could
result in interference with the T/R inclined drive shaft and subsequent
loss of control of the helicopter.
    The NPRM was prompted by AD No. 2011-0189-E, dated September 21,
2011 (AD 2011-0189-E), issued by the European Aviation Safety Agency
(EASA), which is the Technical Agent for the Member States of the
European Union. EASA advises of cracks along the rivet line joining the
IGB fairing to the gutter and in the associated attachment points,
which have caused some fairings to separate and interfere with the T/R
inclined drive shaft. EASA issued AD 2011-0189-E to require inspecting
the IGB fairing gutter and also require inspecting the IGB fairing and
attachment supports for cracks every 15 flight hours.

Comments

    We gave the public the opportunity to participate in developing
this AD, but we did not receive any comments on the NPRM (78 FR 33764,
June 5, 2013).

FAA's Determination

    These helicopters have been approved by the aviation authority of
France and are approved for operation in the United States. Pursuant to
our bilateral agreement with France, EASA, its technical
representative, has notified us of the unsafe condition described in
the EASA AD. We are issuing this AD because we evaluated all
information provided by EASA and determined the unsafe condition exists
and is likely to exist or develop on other helicopters of these same
type designs and that air safety and the public interest require
adopting the AD requirements as proposed.

Related Service Information

    Eurocopter has issued one emergency alert service bulletin (ASB)
with three numbers, revision 4, dated September 27, 2011: ASB No.
53.01.47 for Model AS 332 series helicopters, ASB No. 53.00.48 for
Model AS532 series helicopters, and ASB No. 53A001 for Model EC225 and
EC725 helicopters. The ASB requires inspecting the IGB fairings and
their attachment supports and replacing any cracked or damaged parts
every 15 flight hours.

Costs of Compliance

    We estimate that this AD will affect 10 helicopters of U.S.
Registry. We estimate that operators may incur the following costs in
order to comply with this AD. Inspecting the IGB fairing and attachment
supports require about 0.5 work hours at an average labor rate of $85
per work hour, for a total cost per helicopter of $43 per inspection
cycle. The total cost to the U.S. operator fleet will be $430 per
inspection cycle. Replacing a cracked IGB fairing would require about 2
work hours at an average labor rate of $85 per work hour, and required
parts would cost $1,905, for a total cost per helicopter of $2,075.
Replacing a damaged T/R inclined drive shaft tube would require about 2
work hours, and required parts would cost $16,726, for a total cost per
helicopter of $16,896. Replacing a damaged hydraulic pipe would require
about 2 work hours and required parts would cost $1,202, for a total
cost per helicopter of $1,372. Replacing a damaged flight control
component would require about 2 work hours, and required parts would
cost $440, for a total cost per helicopter of $610.

Authority for This Rulemaking

    Title 49 of the United States Code specifies the FAA's authority to
issue rules on aviation safety. Subtitle I, section 106, describes the
authority of the FAA Administrator. Subtitle VII: Aviation Programs,
describes in more detail the scope of the Agency's authority.

    We are issuing this rulemaking under the authority described in
Subtitle VII, Part A, Subpart III, Section 44701: ``General
requirements.'' Under that section, Congress charges the FAA with
promoting safe flight of civil aircraft in air commerce by prescribing
regulations for practices, methods, and procedures the Administrator
finds necessary for safety in air commerce. This regulation is within
the scope of that authority because it addresses an unsafe condition
that is likely to exist or develop on helicopters identified in this
rulemaking action.

Regulatory Findings

    This AD will not have federalism implications under Executive Order
13132. This AD will not have a substantial direct effect on the States,
on the relationship between the national government and the States, or
on the distribution of power and responsibilities among the various
levels of government.
    For the reasons discussed above, I certify that this AD:
    (1) Is not a ``significant regulatory action'' under Executive
Order 12866;
    (2) Is not a ``significant rule'' under DOT Regulatory Policies and
Procedures (44 FR 11034, February 26, 1979);
    (3) Will not affect intrastate aviation in Alaska to the extent
that it justifies making a regulatory distinction; and
    (4) Will not have a significant economic impact, positive or
negative, on a substantial number of small entities under the criteria
of the Regulatory Flexibility Act.
    We prepared an economic evaluation of the estimated costs to comply
with this AD and placed it in the AD docket.

List of Subjects in 14 CFR Part 39

    Air transportation, Aircraft, Aviation safety, Incorporation by
reference, Safety.

Adoption of the Amendment

    Accordingly, under the authority delegated to me by the
Administrator, the FAA amends 14 CFR part 39 as follows:

PART 39--AIRWORTHINESS DIRECTIVES

0
1. The authority citation for part 39 continues to read as follows:

    Authority:  49 U.S.C. 106(g), 40113, 44701.

Sec.  39.13  [Amended]

0
2. The FAA amends Sec.  39.13 by adding the following new airworthiness
directive (AD):

2013-22-17 Eurocopter France: Amendment 39-17649; Docket No. FAA-
2013-0479; Directorate Identifier 2011-SW-070-AD.

(a) Applicability

    This AD applies to Eurocopter France (Eurocopter) Model AS332C,
AS332L, AS332L1, AS332L2, and EC225LP helicopters with an
intermediate gearbox (IGB) fairing, part number (P/N) 332A24-0303-
0501, P/N 332A24-0303-0601, P/N 332A081391.00, or P/N 332A081391.01
installed, certificated in any category.

(b) Unsafe Condition

    This AD defines the unsafe condition as a crack in the IGB
fairing, which could result in separation of the IGB fairing from
its attachment supports, resulting in interference with the tail
rotor (T/R) inclined driveshaft, failure of the T/R inclined
driveshaft, and subsequent loss of control of the helicopter.

(c) Effective Date

    This AD becomes effective December 9, 2013.

(d) Compliance

    You are responsible for performing each action required by this
AD within the specified compliance time unless it has already been
accomplished prior to that time.

(e) Required Actions

    Within 15 hours time-in-service (TIS), and thereafter at
intervals not to exceed 15 hours TIS:
    (1) For all helicopters, inspect the IGB fairing and both
attachment supports for a crack. If there is a crack, replace the
cracked part with an airworthy part.
    (2) For helicopters with an IGB fairing, part number (P/N)
332A24-0303-0501 or P/N 332A24-0303-0601, installed, inspect the IGB
fairing gutter (gutter) for a crack. If there is a crack, replace
the gutter with an airworthy gutter, and inspect the IGB fairing for
separation, or interference between the gutter and the T/R inclined
drive shaft, hydraulic pipes, or flight controls.
    (i) If there is interference between the gutter and the T/R
inclined drive shaft tube, replace the T/R inclined drive shaft tube
and the IGB fairing/gutter assembly with an airworthy T/R inclined
drive shaft tube and IGB fairing/gutter assembly.
    (ii) If there is interference between the gutter and the
hydraulic pipes, replace the IGB fairing/gutter assembly with an
airworthy IGB fairing/gutter assembly. Inspect the hydraulic pipes
for a dent, score, distortion, or chafing. If there is a dent,
score, distortion, or chafing, replace the affected hydraulic pipe
with an airworthy hydraulic pipe.
    (iii) If there is interference between the gutter and the flight
controls, replace the IGB fairing/gutter assembly with an airworthy
IGB fairing/gutter assembly. Inspect the cables on the left hand
side of the pylon, the quadrant on which the cables are coiled, the
flight control lever, the rod, and the T/R servo-control operating
mechanism for friction, chafing, broken strands, buckling,
distortion, or scoring. If there is any friction, chafing, broken
strands, buckling, distortion, or scoring, replace the affected
flight control component with an airworthy flight control component.
    (iv) If there is any separation of the gutter, replace the IBG
fairing/gutter assembly with an airworthy fairing/gutter assembly.

(f) Alternative Methods of Compliance (AMOCs)

    (1) The Manager, Safety Management Group, FAA, may approve AMOCs
for this AD. Send your proposal to: Gary Roach, Aviation Safety
Engineer, Regulations and Policy Group, Rotorcraft Directorate, FAA,
2601 Meacham Blvd., Fort Worth, Texas 76137; telephone (817) 222-
5110; email<EMAIL_ADDRESS>    (2) For operations conducted under a 14 CFR part 119 operating
certificate or under 14 CFR part 91, subpart K, we suggest that you
notify your principal inspector, or lacking a principal inspector,
the manager of the local flight standards district office or
certificate holding district office, before operating any aircraft
complying with this AD through an AMOC.

(g) Additional Information

    (1) Eurocopter Emergency Alert Service Bulletin (EASB) No.
53.01.47 for Model AS 332 helicopters, EASB No. 53.00.48 for Model
AS532 helicopters, and EASB No. 53A001 for Model EC225 and EC725
helicopters, all revision 4, dated September 27, 2011, which are not
incorporated by reference, contain additional information about the
subject of this AD. For service information identified in this AD,
contact American Eurocopter Corporation, 2701 N. Forum Drive, Grand
Prairie, TX 75052; telephone<PHONE_NUMBER> or<PHONE_NUMBER>; fax
(972) 641-3775; or at http://www.eurocopter.com/techpub. You may
review a copy of the service information at the FAA, Office of the
Regional Counsel, Southwest Region, 2601 Meacham Blvd., Room 663,
Fort Worth, Texas 76137.
    (2) The subject of this AD is addressed in European Aviation
Safety Agency (EASA) Emergency AD No. 2011-0189-E, dated September
29, 2011. You may view the EASA AD on the internet in Docket No.
FAA-2013-0479 at http://www.regulations.gov.

(h) Subject

    Joint Aircraft Service Component (JASC) Code: 5350: Aerodynamic
Fairings.

    Issued in Fort Worth, Texas, on October 24, 2013.
Kim Smith,
Directorate Manager, Rotorcraft Directorate, Aircraft Certification
Service.
[FR Doc. 2013-26052 Filed 11-1-13; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910-13-P


[Federal Register Volume 79, Number 209 (Wednesday, October 29, 2014)]
[Notices]
[Pages 64377-64378]
[FR Doc No: 2014-25711]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission

Combined Notice of Filings #1

    Take notice that the Commission received the following electric
rate filings:

    Docket Numbers: ER14-1711-006; ER14-1822-003.
    Applicants: TC Ravenswood, LLC.
    Description: Joint Uncontested Offer of Settlement of TC
Ravenswood, LLC and New York Independent System Operator, Inc., et. al.
    Filed Date: 10/20/14.
    Accession Number: 20141020-5209.
    Comments Due: 5 p.m. ET 10/31/14.

    Docket Numbers: ER15-142-000.
    Applicants: Midcontinent Independent System Operator, Inc.
    Description: Sec.  205(d) rate filing per 35.13(a)(2)(iii): 2014-
10-21_Marshall-MRES Attachment O Filing to be effective 1/1/2015.
    Filed Date: 10/21/14.
    Accession Number: 20141021-5169.
    Comments Due: 5 p.m. ET 11/12/14.

    Docket Numbers: ER15-143-000.
    Applicants: Brookfield Renewable Energy Marketing US.
    Description: Sec.  205(d) rate filing per 35.13(a)(2)(iii):
Brookfield Renewable Energy Marketing US LLC to be effective 10/22/
2014.
    Filed Date: 10/21/14.
    Accession Number: 20141021-5181.
    Comments Due: 5 p.m. ET 11/12/14.

    Docket Numbers: ER15-144-000.
    Applicants: California Independent System Operator Corporation.
    Description: Sec.  205(d) rate filing per 35.13(a)(2)(iii): 2014-
10-21_CopperMountainSolar2UFA to be effective 7/24/2014.
    Filed Date: 10/21/14.
    Accession Number: 20141021-5196.
    Comments Due: 5 p.m. ET 11/12/14.

    Docket Numbers: ER15-145-000.
    Applicants: Southern California Edison Company.
    Description: Sec.  205(d) rate filing per 35.13(a)(2)(iii): GIA and
Distribution Service Agmt with Walnut Valley Water District to be
effective 10/18/2014.
    Filed Date: 10/22/14.
    Accession Number: 20141022-5001.
    Comments Due: 5 p.m. ET 11/12/14.

    Docket Numbers: ER15-146-000.
    Applicants: ISO New England Inc.
    Description: ISO New England Inc. submits Resource Termination of
Plainfield Renewable Energy LLC.
    Filed Date: 10/21/14.
    Accession Number: 20141021-5207.
    Comments Due: 5 p.m. ET 11/12/14.

    Docket Numbers: ER15-147-000.
    Applicants: ISO New England Inc.
    Description: ISO New England Inc. submits Resource Termination of
Enerwise Global Technologies.
    Filed Date: 10/21/14.
    Accession Number: 20141021-5208.
    Comments Due: 5 p.m. ET 11/12/14.

    Docket Numbers: ER15-148-000.
    Applicants: ISO New England Inc.
    Description: ISO New England Inc. submits Resource Termination of
Direct Energy Business Management.
    Filed Date: 10/21/14.
    Accession Number: 20141021-5209.
    Comments Due: 5 p.m. ET 11/12/14.

    Docket Numbers: ER15-149-000.
    Applicants: ISO New England Inc.
    Description: ISO New England Inc. submits Resource Termination of
Constellation NewEnergy, Inc.
    Filed Date: 10/21/14.
    Accession Number: 20141021-5210.
    Comments Due: 5 p.m. ET 11/12/14.

    Docket Numbers: ER15-150-000.
    Applicants: ISO New England Inc.
    Description: ISO New England Inc. submits Resource Termination of
Brookfield White Pine Hydro, LLC.
    Filed Date: 10/21/14.
    Accession Number: 20141021-5211.
    Comments Due: 5 p.m. ET 11/12/14.

    Docket Numbers: ER15-151-000.
    Applicants: AEP Generation Resources Inc.
    Description: Sec.  205(d) rate filing per 35.13(a)(2)(iii): Ohio
Power Supply Agreement Amendment to be effective 11/1/2014.
    Filed Date: 10/22/14.
    Accession Number: 20141022-5072.
    Comments Due: 5 p.m. ET 11/12/14.

    The filings are accessible in the Commission's eLibrary system by
clicking on the links or querying the docket number.
    Any person desiring to intervene or protest in any of the above
proceedings must file in accordance with Rules 211 and 214 of the
Commission's Regulations (18 CFR 385.211 and 385.214) on or before 5:00
p.m. Eastern time on the specified comment date. Protests may be
considered, but intervention is necessary to become a party to the
proceeding.
    eFiling is encouraged. More detailed information relating to filing
requirements, interventions, protests, service, and qualifying
facilities filings can be found at: http://www.ferc.gov/docs-filing/efiling/filing-req.pdf. For other information, call<PHONE_NUMBER>
(toll free). For TTY, call<PHONE_NUMBER>.

    Dated: October 22, 2014.
Nathaniel J. Davis, Sr.,
Deputy Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2014-25711 Filed 10-28-14; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6717-01-P