familiar with CEDRI and the reporting template for semi-annual
compliance reports. The recordkeeping and reporting costs are presented
in section V.III.C of this preamble.
    We are also proposing a requirement for performance testing no less
frequently than every 5 years for sources in each source category using
the add-on controls compliance options. We estimate that five major
source facilities subject to the ALDT NESHAP would incur costs to
conduct periodic testing because they are currently using the emission
rate with add-on controls compliance option. This total does not
include facilities in the source category that have add-on controls and
are currently required to perform periodic performance testing as a
condition of their state operating permit. The cost for a facility to
conduct a destruction or removal efficiency performance test using EPA
Method 25 or 25A is estimated to be about $19,000, and the total cost
for all five facilities subject to the ALDT NESHAP in a single year
would be $95,000. Similarly, we estimate that seven major source
facilities subject to the MMPP NESHAP would incur costs to conduct
periodic testing because they are currently using the emission rate
with add-on controls compliance option, at a total cost in a single
year of $133,000. Finally, we estimate that three major source
facilities subject to the PPP NESHAP, at a cost in a single year of
$57,000. For further information on the potential costs, see the
memorandum titled Draft Costs/Impacts of the 40 CFR Part 63 Subparts
IIII, MMMM, and PPPP Monitoring Review Revisions, June 2019, in the
ALDT, MMPP, and PPP Dockets.

D. What are the economic impacts?

    The economic impact analysis is designed to inform decision makers
about the potential economic consequences of a regulatory action. For
the current proposals, the EPA estimated the cost of becoming familiar
with the rule and re-evaluating previously developed SSM record systems
and performing periodic emissions testing at certain facilities with
add-on controls that are not already required to perform testing. To
assess the maximum potential impact, the largest cost expected to be
experienced in any one year is compared to the total sales for the
ultimate owner of the affected facilities to estimate the total burden
for each facility.
    For the proposed revisions to the ALDT NESHAP, the total cost is
estimated to be approximately $110,000 for the 43 affected entities in
the first year of the rule, and an additional $120,000 in testing and
reporting costs for five facilities in the third year of the rule and
every 5 years thereafter. The 43 affected facilities are owned by 14
different parent companies, and the total costs associated with the
proposed requirements range from 0.000002 to 0.0056 percent of annual
sales revenue per ultimate owner. These costs are not expected to
result in a significant market impact, regardless of whether they are
passed on to the purchaser or absorbed by the firms.
    For the proposed revisions to the MMPP NESHAP, the total cost is
estimated to be approximately $960,000 for the 368 affected entities in
the first year of the rule, and an additional $170,000 in testing and
reporting costs for seven facilities in the third year of the rule and
every 5 years thereafter. The 368 affected facilities are owned by 265
different parent companies, and the total costs associated with the
proposed requirements range from 0.000002 to 0.25 percent of annual
sales revenue per ultimate owner. These costs are not expected to
result in a significant market impact, regardless of whether they are
passed on to the purchaser or absorbed by the firms.
    For the proposed revisions to the PPP NESHAP, the total cost is
estimated to be approximately $330,000 for the 125 affected entities in
the first year of the rule, and an additional $74,000 in testing and
reporting costs for three facilities in the third year of the rule and
every 5 years thereafter. The 125 affected facilities are owned by 94
different parent companies, and the total costs associated with the
proposed requirements range from 0.000008 to 0.22 percent of annual
sales revenue per ultimate owner. These costs are not expected to
result in a significant market impact, regardless of whether they are
passed on to the purchaser or absorbed by the firms.
    The EPA also prepared a small business screening assessment to
determine whether any of the identified affected entities are small
entities, as defined by the U.S. Small Business Administration. One of
the facilities potentially affected by the proposed revisions to the
ALDT NESHAP is a small entity. However, the annualized costs associated
with the proposed requirement is 0.0056 percent of annual

sales revenue for the owner of that facility. Of the facilities
potentially affected by the proposed revisions to the MMPP NESHAP, 110
are small entities. However, the annualized costs associated with the
proposed requirements for the 103 ultimate owners of these 110 affected
small entities range from 0.001 to 0.25 percent of annual sales
revenues per ultimate owner. Of the facilities potentially affected by
the proposed revisions to the PPP NESHAP, 35 are small entities.
However, the annualized costs associated with the proposed requirements
for the 35 ultimate owners of these 35 affected small entities range
from 0.0009 to 0.22 percent of annual sales revenues per ultimate
owner. Therefore, there are no significant economic impacts on a
substantial number of small entities from these proposed amendments.

E. What are the benefits?

    As stated above in section V.B. of this preamble, we were unable to
quantify the specific emissions reductions associated with eliminating
the SSM exemption, although this proposed change has the potential to
reduce emissions of volatile organic HAP.
    Because these proposed amendments are not considered economically
significant, as defined by Executive Order 12866, we did not monetize
the benefits of reducing these emissions. This does not mean that there
are no benefits associated with the potential reduction in volatile
organic HAP from this rule.

VI. Request for Comments

    We solicit comments on this proposed action. In addition to general
comments on this proposed action, we are also interested in additional
data that may improve the risk assessments and other analyses. We are
specifically interested in receiving any improvements to the data used
in the site-specific emissions profiles used for risk modeling. Such
data should include supporting documentation in sufficient detail to
allow characterization of the quality and representativeness of the
data or information. Section VII of this preamble provides more
information on submitting data.

VII. Submitting Data Corrections

    The site-specific emissions profiles used in the source category
risk and demographic analyses and instructions are available for
download on the RTR website at https://www.epa.gov/stationary-sources-air-pollution/surface-coating-automobiles-and-light-duty-trucks-national-emission, for the ALDT NESHAP; https://www.epa.gov/stationary-sources-air-pollution/surface-coating-miscellaneous-metal-parts-and-products-national for the MMPP NESHAP; and https://www.epa.gov/stationary-sources-air-pollution/surface-coating-plastic-parts-and-products-national-emission for the PPP NESHAP. The data files include
detailed information for each HAP emissions release point for the
facilities in these source categories.
    If you believe that the data are not representative or are
inaccurate, please identify the data in question, provide your reason
for concern, and provide any ``improved'' data that you have, if
available. When you submit data, you must provide documentation of the
basis for the revised values to support your suggested changes. To
submit comments on the data downloaded from the RTR website, complete
the following steps:
    1. Within this downloaded file, enter suggested revisions to the
data fields appropriate for that information.
    2. Fill in the commenter information fields for each suggested
revision (i.e., commenter name, commenter organization, commenter email
address, commenter phone number, and revision comments).
    3. Gather documentation for any suggested emissions revisions
(e.g., performance test reports, material balance calculations).
    4. Send the entire downloaded file with suggested revisions in
Microsoft[supreg] Access format and all accompanying documentation to
the ALDT, MMPP, or PPP Docket, as applicable (through the method
described in the ADDRESSES section of this preamble).
    5. If you are providing comments on a single facility or multiple
facilities, you need only submit one file for all facilities. The file
should contain all suggested changes for all sources at that facility
(or facilities). We request that all data revision comments be
submitted in the form of updated Microsoft[supreg] Excel files that are
generated by the Microsoft[supreg] Access file. These files are
provided on the RTR website at https://www.epa.gov/stationary-sources-air-pollution/surface-coating-automobiles-and-light-duty-trucks-national-emission, for the ALDT NESHAP; https://www.epa.gov/stationary-sources-air-pollution/surface-coating-miscellaneous-metal-parts-and-products-national for the MMPP NESHAP; and https://www.epa.gov/stationary-sources-air-pollution/surface-coating-plastic-parts-and-products-national-emission for the PPP NESHAP.

VIII. Statutory and Executive Order Reviews

    Additional information about these statutes and Executive Orders
can be found at https://www.epa.gov/laws-regulations/laws-and-executive-orders.

A. Executive Order 12866: Regulatory Planning and Review and Executive
Order 13563: Improving Regulation and Regulatory Review

    This action is not a significant regulatory action and was,
therefore, not submitted to OMB for review.

B. Executive Order 13771: Reducing Regulations and Controlling
Regulatory Costs

    This action is not expected to be an Executive Order 13771
regulatory action because this action is not significant under
Executive Order 12866.

C. Paperwork Reduction Act (PRA)

    The information collection activities in this proposal have been
submitted for approval to OMB under the PRA, as discussed for each
source category covered by this proposal in sections VIII.C.1 through
3.
1. Surface Coating of Automobiles and Light-Duty Trucks
    The Information Collection Request (ICR) document that the EPA
prepared has been assigned EPA ICR number 2045.07. You can find a copy
of the ICR in the ALDT Docket (Docket ID No. EPA-HQ-OAR-2019-0314), and
it is briefly summarized here.
    As part of the RTR for the ALDT NESHAP, the EPA is not proposing to
revise the emission limit requirements. The EPA is proposing to revise
the SSM provisions of the rule and proposing the use of electronic data
reporting for future performance test data submittals, notifications,
and reports. This information is being collected to assure compliance
with 40 CFR part 63, subpart IIII.
    Respondents/affected entities: Facilities performing surface
coating of automobiles and light-duty trucks.
    Respondent's obligation to respond: Mandatory (40 CFR part 63,
subpart IIII).
    Estimated number of respondents: In the 3 years after the
amendments are final, approximately 43 respondents per year would be
subject to the NESHAP and no additional respondents are expected to
become subject to the NESHAP during that period.
    Frequency of response: The total number of responses in year 1 is
129 and in year 3 is 15. Year 2 would have no responses.
    Total estimated burden: The average annual burden to the ALDT
surface

coating facilities over the 3 years if the amendments are finalized is
estimated to be 410 hours (per year). The average annual burden to the
Agency over the 3 years after the amendments are final is estimated to
be 19 hours (per year). Burden is defined at 5 CFR 1320.3(b).
    Total estimated cost: The average annual cost to the ALDT surface
coating facilities is $47,000 in labor costs and in the first 3 years
after the amendments are final. The average annual capital and
operation and maintenance (O&M) costs is $32,000. The total average
annual Agency cost over the first 3 years after the amendments are
final is estimated to be $910.
2. Surface Coating of Miscellaneous Metal Parts and Products
    The ICR document that the EPA prepared has been assigned EPA ICR
number 2056.07. You can find a copy of the ICR in the MMPP Docket
(Docket ID No. EPA-HQ-OAR-2019-0312), and it is briefly summarized
here.
    As part of the RTR for the MMPP NESHAP, the EPA is not proposing to
revise the emission limit requirements. The EPA is proposing to revise
the SSM provisions of the rule and proposing the use of electronic data
reporting for future performance test data submittals, notifications,
and reports. This information is being collected to assure compliance
with 40 CFR part 63, subpart MMMM.
    Respondents/affected entities: Facilities performing surface
coating of miscellaneous metal parts and products.
    Respondent's obligation to respond: Mandatory (40 CFR part 63,
subpart MMMM).
    Estimated number of respondents: In the 3 years after the
amendments are final, approximately 368 respondents per year will be
subject to the NESHAP and no additional respondents are expected to
become subject to the NESHAP during that period.
    Frequency of response: The total number of responses in year 1 is
1,104 and in year 3 is 14. Year 2 would have no responses.
    Total estimated burden: The average annual burden to the MMPP
surface coating facilities over the 3 years if the amendments are
finalized is estimated to be 2,934 hours (per year). The average annual
burden to the Agency over the 3 years after the amendments are final is
estimated to be 27 hours (per year) for the Agency. Burden is defined
at 5 CFR 1320.3(b).
    Total estimated cost: The average annual cost to the MMPP surface
coating facilities is $334,000 in labor costs in the first 3 years
after the amendments are final. The average annual capital and O&M cost
is $44,000. The average annual Agency cost over the first 3 years after
the amendments are final is estimated to be $1,300.
3. Surface Coating of Plastic Parts and Products
    The ICR document that the EPA prepared has been assigned EPA ICR
number 2044.07. You can find a copy of the ICR in the PPP Docket
(Docket ID No. EPA-HQ-OAR-2019-0313), and it is briefly summarized
here.
    As part of the RTR for the PPP NESHAP, the EPA is not proposing to
revise the emission limit requirements. The EPA is proposing to revise
the SSM provisions of the rule and proposing the use of electronic data
reporting for future performance test data submittals, notifications,
and reports. This information is being collected to assure compliance
with 40 CFR part 63, subpart PPPP.
    Respondents/affected entities: Facilities performing surface
coating of plastic parts and products.
    Respondent's obligation to respond: Mandatory (40 CFR part 63,
subpart PPPP).
    Estimated number of respondents: In the 3 years after the
amendments are final, approximately 125 respondents per year will be
subject to the NESHAP and no additional respondents are expected to
become subject to the NESHAP during that period.
    Frequency of response: The total number of responses in year 1 is
375 and in year 3 is 9. Year 2 would have no responses.
    Total estimated burden: The average annual burden to the PPP
surface coating facilities over the 3 years if the amendments are
finalized is estimated to be 1,007 hours (per year). The average annual
burden to the Agency over the 3 years after the amendments are final is
estimated to be 18 hours (per year) for the Agency. Burden is defined
at 5 CFR 1320.3(b).
    Total estimated cost: The average annual cost to the PPP surface
coating facilities is $115,000 in labor costs in the first 3 years
after the amendments are final. The average annual capital and O&M cost
is $19,000. The average annual Agency cost over the first 3 years after
the amendments are final is estimated to be $870.
    An agency may not conduct or sponsor, and a person is not required
to respond to, a collection of information unless it displays a
currently valid OMB control number. The OMB control numbers for the
EPA's regulations in 40 CFR are listed in 40 CFR part 9.
    Submit your comments on the Agency's need for this information, the
accuracy of the provided burden estimates and any suggested methods for
minimizing respondent burden to the EPA using the dockets identified at
the beginning of this rule. You may also send your ICR-related comments
to OMB's Office of Information and Regulatory Affairs via email to
<EMAIL_ADDRESS>Attention: Desk Officer for the EPA. Since
OMB is required to make a decision concerning the ICR between 30 and 60
days after receipt, OMB must receive comments no later than December 2,
2019. The EPA will respond to any ICR-related comments in the final
rule.

D. Regulatory Flexibility Act (RFA)

    I certify that this action will not have a significant economic
impact on a substantial number of small entities under the RFA. The
economic impact associated with the proposed requirements in this
action for the affected small entities is described in section V.D.
above.

E. Unfunded Mandates Reform Act (UMRA)

    This action does not contain an unfunded mandate of $100 million or
more as described in UMRA, 2 U.S.C. 1531-1538, and does not
significantly or uniquely affect small governments. The action imposes
no enforceable duty on any state, local, or tribal governments or the
private sector.

F. Executive Order 13132: Federalism

    This action does not have federalism implications. It will not have
substantial direct effects on the states, on the relationship between
the national government and the states, or on the distribution of power
and responsibilities among the various levels of government.

G. Executive Order 13175: Consultation and Coordination With Indian
Tribal Governments

    This action does not have tribal implications as specified in
Executive Order 13175. No tribal facilities are known to be engaged in
any of the industries that would be affected by this action (ALDT
surface coating, MMPP surface coating, and PPP surface coating). Thus,
Executive Order 13175 does not apply to this action.

H. Executive Order 13045: Protection of Children From Environmental
Health Risks and Safety Risks

    This action is not subject to Executive Order 13045 because it is
not economically significant as defined in Executive Order 12866, and
because the EPA does not believe the environmental

health or safety risks addressed by this action present a
disproportionate risk to children. This action's health and risk
assessments are contained in sections III.A and C, IV.A.1 and 2, IV.B.1
and 2, and IV.C.1 and 2 of this preamble and are further documented in
the Automobiles and Light-Duty Trucks Risk Assessment Report, in the
ALDT Docket, Miscellaneous Metal Parts and Products Risk Assessment
Report, in the MMPP Docket and the Plastic Parts and Products Risk
Assessment Report, in the PPP Docket.

I. Executive Order 13211: Actions Concerning Regulations That
Significantly Affect Energy Supply, Distribution, or Use

    This action is not subject to Executive Order 13211 because it is
not a significant regulatory action under Executive Order 12866.

J. National Technology Transfer and Advancement Act (NTTAA) and 1 CFR
Part 51

    This rulemaking involves technical standards. We are proposing to
amend the ALDT NESHAP, the MMPP NESHAP, and the PPP NESHAP in this
action to provide owners and operators with the option of using two new
methods. We are proposing to add EPA Method 18 of appendix A to 40 CFR
part 60, ``Measurement of Gaseous Organic Compound Emissions by Gas
Chromatography'' to measure and subtract methane emissions from
measured total gaseous organic mass emissions as carbon. We are also
proposing to amend each of these NESHAP to incorporate by reference
ASTM Method D2369-10 (2015), ``Test Method for Volatile Content of
Coatings'' into these three NESHAP as an alternative to EPA Method 24
for the determination of the volatile matter content in surface
coatings. ASTM Method D2369-10 (2015) is a test method that allows for
more accurate results for multi-component chemical resistant coatings.
    We are proposing to amend the MMPP NESHAP and the PPP NESHAP to
incorporate by reference ASTM Method D2111-10 (2015), ``Standard Test
Methods for Specific Gravity of Halogenated Organic Solvents and Their
Admixtures,'' as an alternative to ASTM Method D1475-13. ASTM Method
D2111-10 (2015) is a test method that allows measurement of specific
gravity at different temperatures that are chosen by the analyst.
    We are proposing to amend all three NESHAP to update ASTM Method
D1475-98, ``Standard Test Method for Density of Liquid Coatings, Inks,
and Related Products,'' by incorporating by reference ASTM Method
D1475-13. This test method covers the measurement of the density of
paints, inks, varnishes, lacquers, and components thereof, other than
pigments, when in fluid form.
    We are proposing to amend the ALDT NESHAP and the MMPP NESHAP to
update ASTM Method D2697-86 (1998), ``Standard Test Method for Volume
Nonvolatile Matter in Clear or Pigmented Coatings,'' by incorporating
by reference ASTM Method D2697-03 (2014), which is the updated version
of the previously approved method, and to update ASTM Method D6093-97
(2003), ``Standard Test Method for Percent Volume Nonvolatile Matter in
Clear or Pigmented Coatings Using Helium Gas Pycnometer,'' by
incorporating by reference ASTM Method D6093-97 (2016), which is the
updated version of the previously approved method. ASTM Method D2697-03
(2014) is a test method that can be used to determine the volume of
nonvolatile matter in clear and pigmented coatings and ASTM Method
D6093-97 (2016) is a test method that can be used to determine the
percent volume of nonvolatile matter in clear and pigmented coatings.
    We are proposing to amend the ALDT NESHAP to update ASTM D5066-91,
``Standard Test Method for Determination of the Transfer Efficiency
Under Production Conditions for Spray Application of Automotive Paints-
Weight Basis,'' by incorporating by reference ASTM D5066-91 (Reapproved
2017). This test method covers procedures for determination of the
transfer efficiency (using a weight method) under production conditions
for in-plant spray application of automotive paints as outlined in
Section 18 of EPA 450/3-88-018.
    We are proposing to amend the ALDT NESHAP and the MMPP NESHAP to
update ASTM Method D5965, ``Standard Test Methods for Specific Gravity
of Coating Powders,'' by incorporating by reference ASTM Method D5965-
02 (2013). These test methods cover three procedures for determining
the specific gravity (see definition) of coating powders, i.e., Test
Method A--For Testing Coating Powders, Excluding Metallics; Test Method
B--For Tests Requiring Greater Precision than Test Method A, Including
Metallics, Using Helium Pycnometry; and Test Method C--For Theoretical
Calculation Based on Raw Material.
    We are proposing to amend the ALDT NESHAP to update ASTM D6266-00a,
``Test Method for Determining the Amount of Volatile Organic Compound
(VOC) Released from Waterborne Automotive Coatings and Available for
Removal in a VOC Control Device (Abatement),'' by incorporating by
reference ASTM D6266-00a (Reapproved 2017). This test method describes
the determination of the amount of VOC released from applied waterborne
automotive coatings that is available for delivery to a VOC control
device. The determination is accomplished by measuring the weight loss
of a freshly coated test panel subject to evaporation or drying and by
analysis of the VOC or water content in the coating.
    The ASTM standards are available from the American Society for
Testing and Materials (ASTM), 100 Barr Harbor Drive, Post Office Box
C700, West Conshohocken, PA 19428-2959. See http://www.astm.org/.
    The EPA is proposing to amend the ALDT NESHAP to incorporate by
reference EPA-450/3-88-018 ``Protocol for Determining Daily Volatile
Organic Compound Emission Rate of Automobile and Light Duty Truck
Topcoat Operations'' for use in Sec. Sec.  63.3161(f), 63.3165(e). This
protocol determines the daily VOC emission rate (pounds of VOC per
gallon of coating solids deposited) for a complete automobile and
light-duty truck topcoat operation and is available in the ALDT Docket.
The protocol is designed for uses in cases where topcoat emission limit
is stated in units of pounds of VOC per gallon of solids deposited,
compliance is demonstrated each day, and entire topcoat operation is
treated as a single entity. The protocol uses the number of square feet
coated on each vehicle in each booth with each coating as the basis for
the daily weighting of individual transfer efficiency and bake oven
exhaust control values. The method is intended to apply to primary
coatings for new ALDT bodies, body parts for new ALDT, and other parts
that are coated along with these bodies or body parts. It can also be
downloaded from EPA's website at the National Service Center for
Environmental Publications, just access the following website at
https://nepis.epa.gov and search either the title or document number.
The EPA is not proposing ASTM Method D1963-85 (1996), ``Standard Test
Method for Specific Gravity of Drying Oils, Varnishes, Resins, and
Related Materials at 25/25 C,'' as an alternative for the determination
of the specific gravity because ASTM has withdrawn the method without
replacement. The EPA is also not proposing California Air Resources
Board Method 310, ``Determination of Volatile Organic

Compounds in Consumer Products and Reactive Organic Compounds in
Aerosol Coating Products,'' as an alternative to EPA Method 24 because
the EPA has approved the method only for consumer products and aerosol
coatings, which do not apply to the rulemakings or source categories
addressed in this action.
    ASTM D5087-02 was previously approved for incorporation by
reference into Sec.  63.3165(e).
    Although we identified another 14 VCS for ALDT, MMPP, and PPP as
being possible alternatives for methods included in these rules, we are
not proposing to add these VCS in these rulemakings. See the memoranda
titled Voluntary Consensus Standard Results for Surface Coating of
Automobiles and Light-duty Trucks, June 2019, Voluntary Consensus
Standard Results for Surface Coating of Miscellaneous Metal Parts and
Products, June 2019, and Voluntary Consensus Standard Results for
Surface Coating of Plastic Parts and Products, June 2019, in the ALDT
Docket, MMPP Docket, and the PPP Docket, respectively, for the reasons
for these determinations.
    Under 40 CFR 63.7(f) and 40 CFR 63.8(f) of subpart A of the General
Provisions, a source may apply to the EPA for permission to use
alternative test methods or alternative monitoring requirements in
place of any required testing methods, performance specifications, or
procedures in the final rule or any amendments.
    The EPA welcomes comments on this aspect of the proposed rulemaking
and, specifically, invites the public to identify potentially
applicable VCS and to explain why such standards should be used in this
regulation.

K. Executive Order 12898: Federal Actions To Address Environmental
Justice in Minority Populations and Low-Income Populations

    The EPA believes that this action does not have disproportionately
high and adverse human health or environmental effects on minority
populations, low-income populations, and/or indigenous peoples, as
specified in Executive Order 12898 (59 FR 7629, February 16, 1994).
    The documentation for this decision is contained in sections IV.A.1
and 2, sections IV.B.1 and 2, and IV.C.1 and 2 of this preamble and the
technical reports titled Risk and Technology Review--Analysis of
Demographic Factors for Populations Living Near Surface Coating of
Automobiles and Light-Duty Trucks Source Category Operations, March
2019, Risk and Technology Review--Analysis of Demographic Factors for
Populations Living Near Surface Coating of Miscellaneous Metal Parts
and Products Source Category Operations, May 2019, and Risk and
Technology Review--Analysis of Demographic Factors for Populations
Living Near Surface Coating of Plastic Parts and Products Source
Category Operations, April 2019, available in the ALDT Docket, MMPP
Docket, and the PPP Docket, respectively.
    As discussed in sections IV.A.1, IV.B.1, and IV.C.1 of this
preamble, we performed a demographic analysis for each source category,
which is an assessment of risks to individual demographic groups, of
the population close to the facilities (within 50 km and within 5 km).
In this analysis, we evaluated the distribution of HAP-related cancer
risks and noncancer hazards from the ALDT, MMPP, and PPP source
categories across different social, demographic, and economic groups
within the populations living near operations identified as having the
highest risks.
    The results of the ALDT source category demographic analysis
indicate that approximately 15,000 people are exposed to a cancer risk
at or above 1-in-1 million and no one is exposed to a chronic noncancer
HI greater than 1. The overall percent of the population that is
minorities is similar nationally (38 percent) and for the category
population with cancer risk greater than or equal to 1-in-1 million (40
percent). However, the category population with cancer risk greater
than or equal to 1-in-1 million has a greater percent Hispanic
population (27 percent) as compared to the national percent Hispanic
population (18 percent).
    The proximity results (irrespective of risk) indicate that the
overall percentage of the population that is minority is higher (48
percent) within 5 km of ALDT facilities than the nationwide percentage
(38 percent). This is driven by a higher percentage of ``African
American'' (27 percent) within 5 km of facilities in this category than
the nationwide percentage (12 percent).
    The results of the MMPP source category demographic analysis
indicate that approximately 18,000 people are exposed to a cancer risk
at or above 1-in-1 million and no one is exposed to a chronic noncancer
HI greater than 1. The percentages of the at-risk population in the
following specific demographic groups are higher than their respective
nationwide percentages: ``White,'' ``Below the Poverty Level,'' and
``Over 25 and Without a High School Diploma.''
    The proximity results (irrespective of risk) indicate that the
overall percentage of the population that is minority is higher (45
percent) within 5 km of MMPP facilities than the nationwide percentage
(38 percent). This is driven by a higher percentage of ``African
American'' (18 percent) within 5 km of facilities in this category than
the nationwide percentage (12 percent).
    The results of the PPP source category demographic analysis
indicate that approximately 500 people are exposed to a cancer risk at
or above 1-in-1 million and no one is exposed to a chronic noncancer HI
greater than 1. The percentages of the at-risk population in the
following specific demographic groups are higher than their respective
nationwide percentages: ``White'' and ``Below the Poverty Level.''
    The proximity results (irrespective of risk) indicate that the
population percentages for all demographic categories located within 5
km of PPP facilities are very similar to their respective nationwide
percentages.
    We do not expect this proposal to achieve significant reductions in
HAP emissions. The EPA anticipates that this action does not have
disproportionately high and adverse human health or environmental
effects on minority populations, low-income populations, and/or
indigenous peoples, as specified in Executive Order 12898 (59 FR 7629,
February 16, 1994) because it does not significantly affect the level
of protection provided to human health or the environment. The
documentation for this decision is contained in section IV of this
preamble and the technical reports titled Risk and Technology Review--
Analysis of Demographic Factors for Populations Living Near Surface
Coating of Automobiles and Light-Duty Trucks Category Operations, June
2019, Risk and Technology Review--Analysis of Demographic Factors for
Populations Living Near Surface Coating of Miscellaneous Metal Parts
and Products Source Category Operations, June 2019, and Risk and
Technology Review--Analysis of Demographic Factors for Populations
Living Near Surface Coating of Plastic Parts and Products Source
Category Operations, June 2019, which are available in the ALDT Docket,
MMPP Docket, and the PPP Docket, respectively.

List of Subjects in 40 CFR Part 63

    Environmental protection, Air pollution control, Appendix A,
Hazardous substances, Incorporation by reference, Reporting and
recordkeeping requirements, Surface coating of automobiles and light-
duty trucks, Surface coating of miscellaneous metal

parts and products, Surface coating of plastic parts and products.

     Dated: August 16, 2019.
Andrew R. Wheeler,
Administrator.

    For the reasons stated in the preamble, the Environmental
Protection Agency proposes to amend part 63 of title 40, chapter I, of
the Code of Federal Regulations as follows:

PART 63--NATIONAL EMISSION STANDARDS FOR HAZARDOUS AIR POLLUTANTS
FOR SOURCE CATEGORIES

0
1. The authority citation for part 63 continues to read as follows:

    Authority:  42 U.S.C. 7401 et seq.

Subpart A--General Provisions

0
2. Section 63.14 is amended by:
0
a. Revising paragraphs (h)(12), (13), (21), (26), (29), (30), (66),
(76), (78), (79), and (81);
0
b. Redesignating paragraphs (n)(1) through (24) as paragraphs (n)(2)
through (25); and
0
c. Adding new paragraph (n)(1).
    The revisions and addition read as follows:

Sec.  63.14  Incorporations by reference

* * * * *
    (h) * * *
    (12) ASTM D1475-98 (Reapproved 2003), ``Standard Test Method for
Density of Liquid Coatings, Inks, and Related Products,'' IBR approved
for Sec.  63.4141(b) and (c).
    (13) ASTM D1475-13, Standard Test Method for Density of Liquid
Coatings, Inks, and Related Products, approved November 1, 2013, IBR
approved for Sec. Sec.  63.3151(b), 63.3941(b) and (c), 63.3951(c),
63.4141(b) and (c), 63.4551(c), 63.4741(b) and (c), 63.4751(c), and
63.4941(b) and (c).
* * * * *
    (21) ASTM D2111-10 (Reapproved 2015), Standard Test Methods for
Specific Gravity and Density of Halogenated Organic Solvents and Their
Admixtures, approved June 1, 2015, IBR approved for Sec. Sec.
63.3951(c), 63.4141(b) and (c), 63.4551(c), and 63.4741(a).
* * * * *
    (26) ASTM D2369-10 (Reapproved 2015)\e\, Standard Test Method for
Volatile Content of Coatings, approved June 1, 2015, IBR approved for
Sec. Sec.  63.3151(a), 63.3961(j), 63.4141(a) and (b), 63.4161(h),
63.4321(e), 63.4341(e), 63.4351(d), 63.4541(a), 63.4561(j), 63.4741(a),
63.4941(a) and (b), and 63.4961(j).
* * * * *
    (29) ASTM D2697-86 (Reapproved 1998), Standard Test Method for
Volume Nonvolatile Matter in Clear or Pigmented Coatings, IBR approved
for Sec. Sec.  63.3521(b), 63.4141(b), 63.4741(b), 63.4941(b), and
63.5160(c).
    (30) ASTM D2697-03 (Reapproved 2014), Standard Test Method for
Volume Nonvolatile Matter in Clear or Pigmented Coatings, approved July
1, 2014, IBR approved for Sec. Sec.  63.3161(f), 63.3941(b),
63.4141(b), 63.4741(a) and (b), and 63.4941(b).
* * * * *
    (66) ASTM D5066-91 (Reapproved 2017), Standard Test Method for
Determination of the Transfer Efficiency Under Production Conditions
for Spray Application of Automotive Paints-Weight Basis, IBR approved
for Sec.  63.3161(g).
* * * * *
    (76) ASTM D5965-02 (2013), Standard Test Methods for Specific
Gravity of Coating Powders, IBR approved for Sec. Sec.  63.3151(b) and
63.3951(c).
* * * * *
    (78) ASTM D6093-97 (Reapproved 2003), Standard Test Method for
Percent Volume Nonvolatile Matter in Clear or Pigmented Coatings Using
a Helium Gas Pycnometer, IBR approved for Sec. Sec.  63.3521 and
63.5160(c).
    (79) ASTM D6093-97 (Reapproved 2016), Standard Test Method for
Percent Volume Nonvolatile Matter in Clear or Pigmented Coatings Using
a Helium Gas Pycnometer, Approved December 1, 2016, IBR approved for
Sec. Sec.  63.3161(f), 63.3941(b), 63.4141(b), 63.4741(a) and (b), and
63.4941(b).
* * * * *
    (81) ASTM D6266-00a (Reapproved 2017), Test Method for Determining
the Amount of Volatile Organic Compound (VOC) Released from Waterborne
Automotive Coatings and Available for Removal in a VOC Control Device
(Abatement), IBR approved for Sec.  63.3165(e).
* * * * *
    (n) * * *
    (1) EPA-450/3-88-018, Protocol for Determining Daily Volatile
Organic Compound Emission Rate of Automobile and Light-Duty Truck
Topcoat Operations, IBR approved for Sec. Sec.  63.3161(f) and
63.3165(e)
* * * * *

Subpart IIII--National Emission Standards for Hazardous Air
Pollutants: Surface Coating of Automobiles and Light-Duty Trucks

0
3. Section 63.3092 is amended by revising paragraph (a)(2) to read as
follows:

Sec.  63.3092  How must I control emissions from my electrodeposition
primer system if I want to comply with the combined primer-surfacer,
topcoat, final repair, glass bonding primer, and glass bonding adhesive
emission limit?

* * * * *
    (a) * * *
    (2) 0.10 percent by weight of any organic HAP in Table 5 of this
subpart.
* * * * *
0
4. Section 63.3093 is amended by revising paragraph (b) to read as
follows:

Sec.  63.3093  What operating limits must I meet?

* * * * *
    (b) Except as provided in paragraph (d) of this section, for any
controlled coating operation(s), you must meet the operating limits
specified in Table 1 to this subpart. These operating limits apply to
the emission capture and add-on control systems on the coating
operation(s) for which you use this option, and you must establish the
operating limits during performance tests according to the requirements
in Sec.  63.3167. You must meet the operating limits at all times after
you establish them.
* * * * *
0
5. Section 63.3100 is amended by revising paragraphs (b), (d), and (f)
to read as follows:

Sec.  63.3100  What are my general requirements for complying with this
subpart?

* * * * *
    (b) Before [date 181 days after date of publication of final rule
in the Federal Register], the coating operations must be in compliance
with the operating limits for emission capture systems and add-on
control devices required by Sec.  63.3093 at all times except during
periods of startup, shutdown, and malfunction. On and after [date 181
days after date of publication of final rule in the Federal Register],
the coating operations must be in compliance with the operating limits
for emission capture systems and add-on control devices required by
Sec.  63.3093 at all times.
* * * * *
    (d) Before [date 181 days after date of publication of final rule
in the Federal Register], you must always operate and maintain your
affected source including all air pollution control and monitoring

equipment you use for purposes of complying with this subpart according
to the provisions in Sec.  63.6(e)(1)(i). On and after [date 181 days
after date of publication of final rule in the Federal Register], at
all times, the owner or operator must operate and maintain any affected
source, including associated air pollution control equipment and
monitoring equipment, in a manner consistent with safety and good air
pollution control practices for minimizing emissions. The general duty
to minimize emissions does not require the owner or operator to make
any further efforts to reduce emissions if levels required by the
applicable standard have been achieved. Determination of whether a
source is operating in compliance with operation and maintenance
requirements will be based on information available to the
Administrator that may include, but is not limited to, monitoring
results, review of operation and maintenance procedures, review of
operation and maintenance records, and inspection of the affected
source.
* * * * *
    (f) Before [date 181 days after date of publication of final rule
in the Federal Register], if your affected source uses emission capture
systems and add-on control devices, you must develop a written startup,
shutdown, and malfunction plan (SSMP) according to the provisions in
Sec.  63.6(e)(3). The SSMP must address startup, shutdown, and
corrective actions in the event of a malfunction of the emission
capture system or the add-on control devices. On and after [date 181
days after date of publication of final rule in the Federal Register],
the SSMP is not required.
0
6. Section 63.3120 is amended by:
0
a. Revising paragraphs (a)(4), (a)(5) introductory text, (a)(5)(iv),
(a)(6) introductory text, (a)(6)(iii), (a)(6)(vi) through (viii),
(a)(6)(x), and (a)(6)(xiii) and (xiv);
0
b. Adding paragraphs (a)(5)(v) and (a)(6)(xv);
0
c. Revising paragraphs (a)(7) introductory text and (a)(7)(i) and
(iii);
0
d. Adding paragraph (a)(7)(iv);
0
e. Revising paragraphs (a)(8) introductory text, (a)(8)(ii), (a)(8)(v)
through (vii), (a)(8)(ix), (a)(8)(xii), (a)(9) introductory text,
(a)(9)(i) and (ii), and (c) introductory text; and
0
f. Adding paragraphs (d) through (h).
    The revisions and additions read as follows:

Sec.  63.3120  What reports must I submit?

    (a) * * *
    (4) No deviations. If there were no deviations from the emission
limits, operating limits, or work practices in Sec. Sec.  63.3090,
63.3091, 63.3092, 63.3093, and 63.3094 that apply to you, the
semiannual compliance report must include a statement that there were
no deviations from the applicable emission limitations during the
reporting period. If you used control devices to comply with the
emission limits, and there were no periods during which the CPMS were
out of control as specified in Sec.  63.8(c)(7), the semiannual
compliance report must include a statement that there were no periods
during which the CPMS were out of control during the reporting period.
    (5) Deviations: Adhesive, sealer, and deadener. Before [date 181
days after date of publication of final rule in the Federal Register],
if there was a deviation from the applicable emission limits in Sec.
63.3090(c) and (d) or Sec.  63.3091(c) and (d), the semiannual
compliance report must contain the information in paragraphs (a)(5)(i)
through (iv) of this section. On and after [date 181 days after date of
publication of final rule in the Federal Register], if there was a
deviation from the applicable emission limits in Sec.  63.3090(c) and
(d) or Sec.  63.3091(c) and (d), the semiannual compliance report must
contain the information in paragraphs (a)(5)(i) through (v) of this
section.
* * * * *
    (iv) The reason for the deviation (including unknown cause, if
applicable).
    (v) On and after [date 181 days after date of publication of final
rule in the Federal Register], the number of deviations and, for each
deviation, a list of the affected source or equipment, an estimate of
the quantity of each regulated pollutant emitted over the applicable
emission limit in Sec.  63.3090(c) and (d) or Sec.  63.3091(c) and (d),
and a description of the method used to estimate the emissions.
    (6) Deviations: Combined electrodeposition primer, primer-surfacer,
topcoat, final repair, glass bonding primer and glass bonding adhesive,
or combined primer-surfacer, topcoat, final repair, glass bonding
primer, and glass bonding adhesive plus all coatings and thinners,
except for deadener materials and for adhesive and sealer materials
that are not components of glass bonding systems, used in coating
operations added to the affected source pursuant to Sec.  63.3082(c).
Before [date 181 days after date of publication of final rule in the
Federal Register], if there was a deviation from the applicable
emission limits in Sec.  63.3090(a) or (b) or Sec.  63.3091(a) or (b)
or the applicable operating limit(s) in Table 1 to this subpart, the
semiannual compliance report must contain the information in paragraphs
(a)(6)(i) through (xiv) of this section. On and after [date 181 days
after date of publication of final rule in the Federal Register], if
there was a deviation from the applicable emission limits in Sec.
63.3090(a) or (b) or Sec.  63.3091(a) or (b) or the applicable
operating limit(s) in Table 1 to this subpart, the semiannual
compliance report must contain the information in paragraphs (a)(6)(i)
through (xv) of this section.
* * * * *
    (iii) The date and time that each malfunction of the capture system
or add-on control devices used to control emissions from these
operations started and stopped.
* * * * *
    (vi) Before [date 181 days after date of publication of final rule
in the Federal Register], the date and time that each CPMS was
inoperative, except for zero (low-level) and high-level checks. On and
after [date 181 days after date of publication of final rule in the
Federal Register], for each instance that the CPMS was inoperative,
except for zero (low-level) and high-level checks, the date, time, and
duration that the CPMS was inoperative; the cause (including unknown
cause) for the CPMS being inoperative; and descriptions of corrective
actions taken.
    (vii) Before [date 181 days after date of publication of final rule
in the Federal Register], the date and time period that each CPMS was
out of control, including the information in Sec.  63.8(c)(8). On and
after [date 181 days after date of publication of final rule in the
Federal Register], for each instance that the CPMS was out of control,
as specified in Sec.  63.8(c)(7), the date, time, and duration that the
CPMS was out-of-control; the cause (including unknown cause) for the
CPMS being out-of-control; and descriptions of corrective actions
taken.
    (viii) Before [date 181 days after date of publication of final
rule in the Federal Register], The date and time period of each
deviation from an operating limit in Table 1 to this subpart; date and
time period of each bypass of an add-on control device; and whether
each deviation occurred during a period of startup, shutdown, or
malfunction or during another period. On and after [date 181 days after
date of publication of final rule in the Federal Register], the date,
time, and duration of each deviation from an operating limit in Table 1
to this subpart; and the date,

time, and duration of each bypass of an add-on control device.
* * * * *
    (x) Before [date 181 days after date of publication of final rule
in the Federal Register], a breakdown of the total duration of the
deviations from each operating limit in Table 1 to this subpart and
bypasses of each add-on control device during the semiannual reporting
period into those that were due to startup, shutdown, control equipment
problems, process problems, other known causes, and other unknown
causes. On and after [date 181 days after date of publication of final
rule in the Federal Register], a breakdown of the total duration of the
deviations from each operating limit in Table 1 to this subpart and
bypasses of each add-on control device during the semiannual reporting
period into those that were due to control equipment problems, process
problems, other known causes, and other unknown causes.
* * * * *
    (xiii) Before [date 181 days after date of publication of final
rule in the Federal Register], for each deviation from the work
practice standards a description of the deviation, the date and time
period of the deviation, and the actions you took to correct the
deviation. On and after [date 181 days after date of publication of
final rule in the Federal Register], for deviations from the work
practice standards, the number of deviations, and, for each deviation,
the information in paragraphs (a)(6)(xiii)(A) and (B) of this section.
    (A) A description of the deviation, the date, time, and duration of
the deviation; and the actions you took to minimize emissions in
accordance with Sec.  63.3100(d).
    (B) A list of the affected sources or equipment for which a
deviation occurred, the cause of the deviation (including unknown
cause, if applicable), and any corrective actions taken to return the
affected unit to its normal or usual manner of operation.
    (xiv) Before [date 181 days after date of publication of final rule
in the Federal Register], a statement of the cause of each deviation.
On and after [date 181 days after date of publication of final rule in
the Federal Register], for deviations from an emission limitation in
Sec.  63.3090(a) or (b) or Sec.  63.3091(a) or (b) or operating limit
in Table 1 of this subpart, a statement of the cause of each deviation
(including unknown cause, if applicable).
    (xv) On and after [date 181 days after date of publication of final
rule in the Federal Register], for each deviation from an emission
limitation in Sec.  63.3090(a) or (b), or Sec.  63.3091(a) or (b), or
operating limit in Table 1 to this subpart, a list of the affected
sources or equipment for which a deviation occurred, an estimate of the
quantity of each regulated pollutant emitted over any emission limit in
Sec.  63.3090(a) or (b) or Sec.  63.3091(a) or (b), and a description
of the method used to estimate the emissions.
    (7) Deviations: Separate electrodeposition primer organic HAP
content limit. Before [date 181 days after date of publication of final
rule in the Federal Register], if you used the separate
electrodeposition primer organic HAP content limits in Sec.
63.3092(a), and there was a deviation from these limits, the semiannual
compliance report must contain the information in paragraphs (a)(7)(i)
through (iii) of this section. On and after [date 181 days after date
of publication of final rule in the Federal Register], if you used the
separate electrodeposition primer organic HAP content limits in Sec.
63.3092(a), and there was a deviation from these limits, the semiannual
compliance report must contain the information in paragraphs (a)(7)(i)
through (iv) of this section.
    (i) Identification of each material used that deviated from the
emission limit, and the date, time, and duration each was used.
* * * * *
    (iii) A statement of the cause of each deviation (including unknown
case, if applicable).
    (iv) On and after [date 181 days after date of publication of final
rule in the Federal Register], the number of deviations, a list of the
affected source or equipment, an estimate of the quantity of each
regulated pollutant emitted over any emission limit in Sec.
63.3092(a), and a description of the method used to estimate the
emissions.
    (8) Deviations: Separate electrodeposition primer bake oven capture
and control limitations. Before [date 181 days after date of
publication of final rule in the Federal Register], if you used the
separate electrodeposition primer bake oven capture and control
limitations in Sec.  63.3092(b), and there was a deviation from the
limitations in Sec.  63.3092(b) or the applicable operating limit in
Table 1 to this subpart, the semiannual compliance report must contain
the information in paragraphs (a)(8)(i) through (xii) of this section.
On and after [date 181 days after date of publication of final rule in
the Federal Register], if you used the separate electrodeposition
primer bake oven capture and control limitations in Sec.  63.3092(b),
and there was a deviation from the limitations in Sec.  63.3092(b) or
the applicable operating limit in Table 1 to this subpart, the
semiannual compliance report must contain the information in paragraphs
(a)(8)(i) through (xiv) of this section.
* * * * *
    (ii) The date and time that each malfunction of the capture systems
or control devices used to control emissions from the electrodeposition
primer bake oven started and stopped.
* * * * *
    (v) Before [date 181 days after date of publication of final rule
in the Federal Register], the date and time that each CPMS was
inoperative, except for zero (low-level) and high-level checks. On and
after [date 181 days after date of publication of final rule in the
Federal Register], for each instance that the CPMS was inoperative,
except for zero (low-level) and high-level checks, the date, time, and
duration that the CPMS was inoperative; the cause (including unknown
cause) for the CPMS being inoperative; and descriptions of corrective
actions taken.
    (vi) Before [date 181 days after date of publication of final rule
in the Federal Register], the date, time, and duration that each CPMS
was out of control, including the information in Sec.  63.8(c)(8). On
and after [date 181 days after date of publication of final rule in the
Federal Register], for each instance that the CPMS was out of control,
as specified in Sec.  63.8(c)(7), the date, time, and duration that the
CPMS was out-of-control; the cause (including unknown cause) for the
CPMS being out-of-control; and descriptions of corrective actions
taken.
    (vii) Before [date 181 days after date of publication of final rule
in the Federal Register], the date and time period of each deviation
from an operating limit in Table 1 to this subpart; date and time
period of each bypass of an add-on control device; and whether each
deviation occurred during a period of startup, shutdown, or malfunction
or during another period. On and after [date 181 days after date of
publication of final rule in the Federal Register], the date, time, and
duration of each deviation from an operating limit in Table 1 to this
subpart; and the date, time, and duration of each bypass of an add-on
control device.
* * * * *
    (ix) Before [date 181 days after date of publication of final rule
in the Federal Register], a breakdown of the total duration of the
deviations from each operating limit in Table 1 to this subpart and
bypasses of each add-on control device during the semiannual reporting

period into those that were due to startup, shutdown, control equipment
problems, process problems, other known causes, and other unknown
causes. On and after [date 181 days after date of publication of final
rule in the Federal Register], a breakdown of the total duration of the
deviations from each operating limit in Table 1 to this subpart and
bypasses of each add-on control device during the semiannual reporting
period into those that were due to control equipment problems, process
problems, other known causes, and other unknown causes.
* * * * *
    (xii) A statement of the cause of each deviation (including unknown
cause, if applicable).
    (9) Deviations: Work practice plans. Before [date 181 days after
date of publication of final rule in the Federal Register], if there
was a deviation from an applicable work practice plan developed in
accordance with Sec.  63.3094(b) or (c), the semiannual compliance
report must contain the information in paragraphs (a)(9)(i) through
(iii) of this section. On and after [date 181 days after date of
publication of final rule in the Federal Register], if there were
deviations from an applicable work practice plan developed in
accordance with Sec.  63.3094(b) or (c), the semiannual compliance
report must contain the number of deviations, and, for each deviation,
the information in paragraphs (a)(9)(i) through (iii) of this section.
    (i) Before [date 181 days after date of publication of final rule
in the Federal Register], the time period during which each deviation
occurred. On and after [date 181 days after date of publication of
final rule in the Federal Register], the date, time, and duration of
the deviation.
    (ii) Before [date 181 days after date of publication of final rule
in the Federal Register], the nature of each deviation. On and after
[date 181 days after date of publication of final rule in the Federal
Register], the nature of the deviation, including a list of the
affected sources or equipment for which the deviation occurred, and the
cause of the deviation (including unknown cause, if applicable).
* * * * *
    (c) Startup, shutdown, and malfunction reports. Before [date 181
days after date of publication of final rule in the Federal Register],
if you used add-on control devices and you had a startup, shutdown, or
malfunction during the semiannual reporting period, you must submit the
reports specified in paragraphs (c)(1) and (2) of this section. On and
after [date 181 days after date of publication of final rule in the
Federal Register], the reports specified in paragraphs (c)(1) and (2)
of this section are not required.
* * * * *
    (d) On and after [date 181 days after date of publication of final
rule in the Federal Register], you must submit the results of the
performance test required in paragraph (b) of this section following
the procedure specified in paragraphs (d)(1) through (3) of this
section.
    (1) For data collected using test methods supported by the EPA's
Electronic Reporting Tool (ERT) as listed on the EPA's ERT website
(https://www.epa.gov/electronic-reporting-air-emissions/electronic-reporting-tool-ert) at the time of the test, you must submit the
results of the performance test to the EPA via the Compliance and
Emissions Data Reporting Interface (CEDRI). (CEDRI can be accessed
through the EPA's Central Data Exchange (CDX) (https://cdx.epa.gov/)).
Performance test data must be submitted in a file format generated
through the use of the EPA's ERT or an alternate electronic file format
consistent with the extensible markup language (XML) schema listed on
the EPA's ERT website.
    (2) For data collected using test methods that are not supported by
the EPA's ERT as listed on the EPA's ERT website at the time of the
test, you must submit the results of the performance test to the
Administrator at the appropriate address listed in Sec.  63.13, unless
the Administrator agrees to or specifies an alternate reporting method.
    (3) If you claim that some of the performance test information
being submitted under paragraph (c)(1) of this section is confidential
business information (CBI), you must submit a complete file generated
through the use of the EPA's ERT or an alternate electronic file
consistent with the XML schema listed on the EPA's ERT website,
including information claimed to be CBI, on a compact disc, flash
drive, or other commonly used electronic storage medium to the EPA. The
electronic medium must be clearly marked as CBI and mailed to U.S. EPA/
OAPQS/CORE CBI Office, Attention: Group Leader, Measurement Policy
Group, MD C404-02, 4930 Old Page Rd., Durham, NC 27703. The same ERT or
alternate file with the CBI omitted must be submitted to the EPA via
the EPA's CDX as described in paragraph (c)(1) of this section.
    (e) On and after [date 181 days after date of publication of final
rule in the Federal Register], the owner or operator shall submit the
initial notifications required in Sec.  63.9(b) and the notification of
compliance status required in Sec.  63.9(h) and Sec.  63.3110(c) to the
EPA via the CEDRI. (CEDRI can be accessed through the EPA's CDX
(https://cdx.epa.gov/)). The owner or operator must upload to CEDRI an
electronic copy of each applicable notification in portable document
format (PDF). The applicable notification must be submitted by the
deadline specified in this subpart, regardless of the method in which
the reports are submitted. Owners or operators who claim that some of
the information required to be submitted via CEDRI is CBI shall submit
a complete report generated using the appropriate form in CEDRI or an
alternate electronic file consistent with the extensible markup
language (XML) schema listed on the EPA's CEDRI website, including
information claimed to be CBI, on a compact disc, flash drive, or other
commonly used electronic storage medium to the EPA. The electronic
medium shall be clearly marked as CBI and mailed to U.S. EPA/OAQPS/CORE
CBI Office, Attention: Group Leader, Measurement Policy Group, MD C404-
02, 4930 Old Page Rd., Durham, NC 27703. The same file with the CBI
omitted shall be submitted to the EPA via the EPA's CDX as described
earlier in this paragraph.
    (f) On and after [date 181 days after date of publication of final
rule in the Federal Register], or once the reporting template has been
available on the CEDRI website for 1 year, whichever date is later, the
owner or operator shall submit the semiannual compliance report
required in paragraph (a) of this section to the EPA via the CEDRI. The
CEDRI interface can be accessed through the EPA's CDX (https://cdx.epa.gov/). The owner or operator must use the appropriate
electronic template on the CEDRI Web for this subpart or an alternate
electronic file format consistent with the XML schema listed on the
CEDRI website (https://www.epa.gov/electronic-reporting-air-emissions/compliance-and-emissions-data-reporting-interface-cedri). If the
reporting form for the semiannual compliance report specific to this
subpart is not available in CEDRI at the time that the report is due,
you must submit the report to the Administrator at the appropriate
addresses listed in Sec.  63.13. Once the form has been available in
CEDRI for 1 year, you must begin submitting all subsequent reports via
CEDRI. The reports must be submitted by the deadlines specified in this
subpart, regardless of the method in

which the reports are submitted. Owners or operators who claim that
some of the information required to be submitted via CEDRI is CBI shall
submit a complete report generated using the appropriate form in CEDRI
or an alternate electronic file consistent with the XML schema listed
on the EPA's CEDRI website, including information claimed to be CBI, on
a compact disc, flash drive, or other commonly used electronic storage
medium to the EPA. The electronic medium shall be clearly marked as CBI
and mailed to U.S. EPA/OAQPS/CORE CBI Office, Attention: Group Leader,
Measurement Policy Group, MD C404-02, 4930 Old Page Rd., Durham, NC
27703. The same file with the CBI omitted shall be submitted to the EPA
via the EPA's CDX as described earlier in this paragraph.
    (g) If you are required to electronically submit a report through
the CEDRI in the EPA's CDX, and due to a planned or actual outage of
either the EPA's CEDRI or CDX systems within the period of time
beginning 5 business days prior to the date that the submission is due,
you will be or are precluded from accessing CEDRI or CDX and submitting
a required report within the time prescribed, you may assert a claim of
EPA system outage for failure to timely comply with the reporting
requirement. You must submit notification to the Administrator in
writing as soon as possible following the date you first knew, or
through due diligence should have known, that the event may cause or
caused a delay in reporting. You must provide to the Administrator a
written description identifying the date, time and length of the
outage; a rationale for attributing the delay in reporting beyond the
regulatory deadline to the EPA system outage; describe the measures
taken or to be taken to minimize the delay in reporting; and identify a
date by which you propose to report, or if you have already met the
reporting requirement at the time of the notification, the date you
reported. In any circumstance, the report must be submitted
electronically as soon as possible after the outage is resolved. The
decision to accept the claim of EPA system outage and allow an
extension to the reporting deadline is solely within the discretion of
the Administrator.
    (h) If you are required to electronically submit a report through
CEDRI in the EPA's CDX and a force majeure event is about to occur,
occurs, or has occurred or there are lingering effects from such an
event within the period of time beginning 5 business days prior to the
date the submission is due, the owner or operator may assert a claim of
force majeure for failure to timely comply with the reporting
requirement. For the purposes of this section, a force majeure event is
defined as an event that will be or has been caused by circumstances
beyond the control of the affected facility, its contractors, or any
entity controlled by the affected facility that prevents you from
complying with the requirement to submit a report electronically within
the time period prescribed. Examples of such events are acts of nature
(e.g., hurricanes, earthquakes, or floods), acts of war or terrorism,
or equipment failure or safety hazard beyond the control of the
affected facility (e.g., large scale power outage). If you intend to
assert a claim of force majeure, you must submit notification to the
Administrator in writing as soon as possible following the date you
first knew, or through due diligence should have known, that the event
may cause or caused a delay in reporting. You must provide to the
Administrator a written description of the force majeure event and a
rationale for attributing the delay in reporting beyond the regulatory
deadline to the force majeure event; describe the measures taken or to
be taken to minimize the delay in reporting; and identify a date by
which you propose to report, or if you have already met the reporting
requirement at the time of the notification, the date you reported. In
any circumstance, the reporting must occur as soon as possible after
the force majeure event occurs. The decision to accept the claim of
force majeure and allow an extension to the reporting deadline is
solely within the discretion of the Administrator.
0
7. Section 63.3130 is amended by revising paragraphs (g) and (h) and
adding paragraph (p) to read as follows:

Sec.  63.3130  What records must I keep?

* * * * *
    (g) Before [date 181 days after date of publication of final rule
in the Federal Register], a record of the date, time, and duration of
each deviation, and for each deviation, a record of whether the
deviation occurred during a period of startup, shutdown, or
malfunction. On and after [date 181 days after date of publication of
final rule in the Federal Register], for each deviation from an
emission limitation, operating limit, or work practice plan reported
under Sec.  63.3120(a)(5) through (9), a record of the information
specified in paragraphs (g)(1) through (4) of this section, as
applicable.
    (1) The date, time, and duration of the deviation, and for each
deviation, the information as reported under Sec.  63.3120(a)(5)
through (9).
    (2) A list of the affected sources or equipment for which the
deviation occurred and the cause of the deviation, as reported under
Sec.  63.3120(a)(5) through (9).
    (3) An estimate of the quantity of each regulated pollutant emitted
over any applicable emission limit in Sec.  63.3090 (a) through (d) or
63.3091(a) through (d) or any applicable operating limit in Table 1 to
this subpart, and a description of the method used to calculate the
estimate, as reported under Sec.  63.3120(a)(5) through (9).
    (4) A record of actions taken to minimize emissions in accordance
with Sec.  63.3100(d) and any corrective actions taken to return the
affected unit to its normal or usual manner of operation.
    (h) Before [date 181 days after date of publication of final rule
in the Federal Register], the records required by Sec.  63.6(e)(3)(iii)
through (v) related to startup, shutdown, and malfunction. On and after
[date 181 days after date of publication of final rule in the Federal
Register], the provisions of this paragraph no longer apply.
* * * * *
    (p) On and after [date 181 days after date of publication of final
rule in the Federal Register], any records required to be maintained by
this subpart that are submitted electronically via the EPA's CEDRI may
be maintained in electronic format. This ability to maintain electronic
copies does not affect the requirement for facilities to make records,
data, and reports available upon request to a delegated air agency or
the EPA as part of an on-site compliance evaluation.
0
8. Section 63.3131 is amended by revising paragraph (a) to read as
follows:

Sec.  63.3131  In what form and for how long must I keep my records?

    (a) Your records must be in a form suitable and readily available
for expeditious review according to Sec.  63.10(b)(1). Where
appropriate, the records may be maintained as electronic spreadsheets
or as a database. On and after [date 181 days after date of publication
of final rule in the Federal Register], any records required to be
maintained by this subpart that are submitted electronically via the
EPA's CEDRI may be maintained in electronic format. This ability to
maintain electronic copies does not affect the requirement for
facilities to make records, data, and reports available upon request to
a delegated air agency or the EPA as part of an on-site compliance
evaluation.
* * * * *

0
9. Section 63.3151 is amended by revising paragraphs (a)(1)(i), (a)(2)
and (4), and (b) to read as follows.

Sec.  63.3151  How do I demonstrate initial compliance with the
emission limitations?

* * * * *
    (a) * * *
    (1) * * *
    (i) Count each organic HAP in Table 5 to this subpart that is
present at 0.1 percent by mass or more and at 1.0 percent by mass or
more for other compounds. For example, if toluene (not listed in Table
5 to this subpart) is measured to be 0.5 percent of the material by
mass, you do not have to count it. Express the mass fraction of each
organic HAP you count as a value truncated to four places after the
decimal point (e.g., 0.3791).
* * * * *
    (2) EPA Method 24 (appendix A-7 to 40 CFR part 60). For coatings,
you may use EPA Method 24 to determine the mass fraction of nonaqueous
volatile matter and use that value as a substitute for mass fraction of
organic HAP. As an alternative to using EPA Method 24, you may use ASTM
D2369-10 (2015)\e\ (incorporated by reference, see Sec.  63.14).
* * * * *
    (4) Information from the supplier or manufacturer of the material.
You may rely on information other than that generated by the test
methods specified in paragraphs (a)(1) through (3) of this section,
such as manufacturer's formulation data, if it represents each organic
HAP in Table 5 to this subpart that is present at 0.1 percent by mass
or more and at 1.0 percent by mass or more for other compounds. For
example, if toluene (not listed in Table 5 of this subpart) is 0.5
percent of the material by mass, you do not have to count it. If there
is a disagreement between such information and results of a test
conducted according to paragraphs (a)(1) through (3) of this section,
then the test method results will take precedence, unless after
consultation, the facility demonstrates to the satisfaction of the
enforcement authority that the facility's data are correct.
* * * * *
    (b) Determine the density of each material used. Determine the
density of each material used during the compliance period from test
results using ASTM D1475-13 (incorporated by reference, see Sec.
63.14) or for powder coatings, test method A or test method B of ASTM
D5965-02 (2013) (incorporated by reference, see Sec.  63.14), or
information from the supplier or manufacturer of the material. If there
is disagreement between ASTM D1475-13 test results or ASTM D5965-02
(2013), test method A or test method B test results and the supplier's
or manufacturer's information, the test results will take precedence
unless after consultation, the facility demonstrates to the
satisfaction of the enforcement authority that the facility's data are
correct.
* * * * *
0
10. Section 63.3160 is amended by revising the section heading and
paragraph (b)(1) to read as follows:

Sec.  63.3160  By what date must I conduct initial performance tests
and other initial compliance demonstrations?

* * * * *
    (b) * * *
    (1) All emission capture systems, add-on control devices, and CPMS
must be installed and operating no later than the applicable compliance
date specified in Sec.  63.3083. You must conduct an initial
performance test of each capture system and add-on control device
according to the procedures in Sec. Sec.  63.3164 through 63.3166 and
establish the operating limits required by Sec.  63.3093 no later than
the compliance date specified in Sec.  63.3083.
* * * * *
0
11. Section 63.3161 is amended by revising paragraphs (a), (f)(1), (g),
and (k)(3) to read as follows:

Sec.  63.3161  How do I demonstrate initial compliance?

    (a) You must meet all of the requirements of this section to
demonstrate initial compliance. To demonstrate initial compliance, the
organic HAP emissions from the combined electrodeposition primer,
primer-surfacer, topcoat, final repair, glass bonding primer, and glass
bonding adhesive operations plus all coatings and thinners, except for
deadener materials and for adhesive and sealer materials that are not
components of glass bonding systems, used in coating operations added
to the affected source pursuant to Sec.  63.3082(c) must meet the
applicable emission limitation in Sec.  63.3090(a) or Sec.  63.3091(a)
and the applicable operating limits and work practice standards in
Sec. Sec.  63.3093 and 63.3094.
* * * * *
    (f) * * *
    (1) ASTM Method D2697-03 (2014) or ASTM Method D6093-97 (2016). You
may use ASTM D2697-03 (Reapproved 2014) (incorporated by reference, see
Sec.  63.14), or ASTM D6093-97 (Reapproved 2016) (incorporated by
reference, see Sec.  63.14), to determine the volume fraction of
coating solids for each coating. Divide the nonvolatile volume percent
obtained with the methods by 100 to calculate volume fraction of
coating solids.
* * * * *
    (g) Determine the transfer efficiency for each coating. You must
determine the transfer efficiency for each primer-surfacer and topcoat
coating, and for all coatings, except for deadener and for adhesive and
sealer that are not components of glass bonding systems, used in
coating operations added to the affected source pursuant to Sec.
63.3082(c) using ASTM D5066-91 (Reapproved 2017) (incorporated by
reference, see Sec.  63.14), or the guidelines presented in ``Protocol
for Determining Daily Volatile Organic Compound Emission Rate of
Automobile and Light-Duty Truck Topcoat Operations,'' EPA-450/3-88-018.
You may conduct transfer efficiency testing on representative coatings
and for representative spray booths as described in ``Protocol for
Determining Daily Volatile Organic Compound Emission Rate of Automobile
and Light-Duty Truck Topcoat Operations,'' EPA-450/3-88-018. You may
assume 100 percent transfer efficiency for electrodeposition primer
coatings, glass bonding primers, and glass bonding adhesives. For final
repair coatings, you may assume 40 percent transfer efficiency for air
atomized spray and 55 percent transfer efficiency for electrostatic
spray and high volume, low pressure spray. For blackout, chip resistant
edge primer, interior color, in-line repair, lower body anti-chip
coatings, or underbody anti-chip coatings, you may assume 40 percent
transfer efficiency for air atomized spray, 55 percent transfer
efficiency for electrostatic spray and high volume-low pressure spray,
and 80 percent transfer efficiency for airless spray.
* * * * *
    (k) * * *
    (3) Determine the mass fraction of volatile organic matter for each
coating and thinner used in the coating operation controlled by the
solvent recovery system during the month, kg volatile organic matter
per kg coating. You may determine the volatile organic matter mass
fraction using EPA Method 24 of 40 CFR part 60, appendix A-7, or an EPA
approved alternative method, or you may use information provided by the
manufacturer or supplier of the coating. In the event of any
inconsistency between information provided by the manufacturer or
supplier and the results of EPA Method 24 of 40 CFR part 60, appendix
A-7, or an approved alternative method, the test method results will
govern unless after

consultation, the facility demonstrates to the satisfaction of the
enforcement authority that the facility's data are correct.
* * * * *
0
12. Section 63.3163 is amended by revising the section heading and
paragraph (c) introductory text, adding paragraph (c)(3), and revising
paragraphs (f) and (h) to read as follows:

Sec.  63.3163  How do I conduct periodic performance tests and
demonstrate continuous compliance with the emission limitations?

* * * * *
    (c) You must demonstrate continuous compliance with each operating
limit required by Sec.  63.3093 that applies to you, as specified in
Table 1 to this subpart, and you must conduct performance tests as
specified in paragraph (c)(3) of this section.
* * * * *
    (3) Except for solvent recovery systems for which you conduct
liquid-liquid material balances according to Sec.  63.3161(k) for
controlled coating operations, you must conduct periodic performance
tests and establish the operating limits required by Sec.  63.3093
within 5 years following the previous performance test. You must
conduct the first periodic performance test before [date 3 years after
date of publications of final rule in the Federal Register], unless you
are already required to complete periodic performance tests as a
requirement of renewing your facility's operating permit under 40 CFR
part 70 or 40 CFR part 71 and have conducted a performance test on or
after [date 2 years before date of publications of final rule in the
Federal Register]. Thereafter you must conduct a performance test no
later than 5 years following the previous performance test. Operating
limits must be confirmed or reestablished during each performance test.
For any control device for which you are using the catalytic oxidizer
control option at Sec.  63.3167(b) and following the catalyst
maintenance procedures in Sec.  63.3167(b)(6), you are not required to
conduct periodic control device performance testing as specified by
this paragraph. For any control device for which instruments are used
to continuously measure organic compound emissions, you are not
required to conduct periodic control device performance testing as
specified by this paragraph.
* * * * *
    (f) If there were no deviations from the emission limitations,
submit a statement as part of the semiannual compliance report that you
were in compliance with the emission limitations during the reporting
period because the organic HAP emission rate for each compliance period
was less than or equal to the applicable emission limit in Sec.
63.3090(a) or Sec.  63.3091(a), Sec.  63.3090(b) or Sec.  63.3091(b),
or Sec.  63.3092(a) or Sec.  63.3092(b), you achieved the operating
limits required by Sec.  63.3093, and you achieved the work practice
standards required by Sec.  63.3094 during each compliance period.
* * * * *
    (h) Before [date 181 days after date of publication of final rule
in the Federal Register], consistent with Sec. Sec.  63.6(e) and
63.7(e)(1), deviations that occur during a period of startup, shutdown,
or malfunction of the emission capture system, add-on control device,
or coating operation that may affect emission capture or control device
efficiency are not violations if you demonstrate to the Administrator's
satisfaction that you were operating in accordance with Sec.
63.6(e)(1). The Administrator will determine whether deviations that
occur during a period you identify as a startup, shutdown, or
malfunction are violations according to the provisions in Sec.
63.6(e). On and after [date 181 days after date of publication of final
rule in the Federal Register], the provisions of this paragraph no
longer apply.
* * * * *
0
13. Section 63.3164 is amended by revising paragraphs (a) introductory
text and (a)(1) to read as follows:

Sec.  63.3164  What are the general requirements for performance tests?

    (a) You must conduct each applicable performance test required by
Sec. Sec.  63.3160, 63.3163, and 63.3171 according to the requirements
in Sec.  63.7(e)(1) and under the conditions in this section unless you
obtain a waiver of the performance test according to the provisions in
Sec.  63.7(h).
    (1) Representative coating operation operating conditions. You must
conduct the performance test under representative operating conditions
for the coating operation. Before [date 181 days after date of
publication of final rule in the Federal Register], operations during
periods of startup, shutdown, or malfunction, and during periods of
nonoperation do not constitute representative conditions. You must
record the process information that is necessary to document operating
conditions during the test and explain why the conditions represent
normal operation. On and after [date 181 days after date of publication
of final rule in the Federal Register], operations during periods of
startup, shutdown, or nonoperation do not constitute representative
conditions for purposes of conducting a performance test. The owner or
operator may not conduct performance tests during periods of
malfunction. You must record the process information that is necessary
to document operating conditions during the test and explain why the
conditions represent normal operation. Upon request, you must make
available to the Administrator such records as may be necessary to
determine the conditions of performance tests.
* * * * *
0
14. Section 63.3165 is amended by revising the introductory text and
paragraphs (e) introductory text, the definition of
``Wvocc,i'' in Equation 6 of paragraph (e)(2), the
definition of ``Wvocc,i'' in Equation 7 of paragraph (e)(3),
and the definition of ``Ws,i'' in Equation 8 of paragraph
(e)(4) to read as follows:

Sec.  63.3165  How do I determine the emission capture system
efficiency?

    You must use the procedures and test methods in this section to
determine capture efficiency as part of the performance test required
by Sec.  63.3160 and Sec.  63.3163. For purposes of this subpart, a
spray booth air seal is not considered a natural draft opening in a PTE
or a temporary total enclosure provided you demonstrate that the
direction of air movement across the interface between the spray booth
air seal and the spray booth is into the spray booth. For purposes of
this subpart, a bake oven air seal is not considered a natural draft
opening in a PTE or a temporary total enclosure provided you
demonstrate that the direction of air movement across the interface
between the bake oven air seal and the bake oven is into the bake oven.
You may use lightweight strips of fabric or paper, or smoke tubes to
make such demonstrations as part of showing that your capture system is
a PTE or conducting a capture efficiency test using a temporary total
enclosure. You cannot count air flowing from a spray booth air seal
into a spray booth as air flowing through a natural draft opening into
a PTE or into a temporary total enclosure unless you elect to treat
that spray booth air seal as a natural draft opening. You cannot count
air flowing from a bake oven air seal into a bake oven as air flowing
through a natural draft opening into a PTE or into a temporary total
enclosure unless you elect to treat that bake oven air seal as a
natural draft opening.
* * * * *
    (e) Panel testing to determine the capture efficiency of flash-off
or bake oven emissions. You may conduct panel

testing to determine the capture efficiency of flash-off or bake oven
emissions using ASTM D5087-02 (incorporated by reference, see Sec.
63.14), ASTM D6266-00a (Reapproved 2017) (incorporated by reference,
see Sec.  63.14), or the guidelines presented in ``Protocol for
Determining Daily Volatile Organic Compound Emission Rate of Automobile
and Light-Duty Truck Topcoat Operations,'' EPA-450/3-88-018 . You may
conduct panel testing on representative coatings as described in
``Protocol for Determining Daily Volatile Organic Compound Emission
Rate of Automobile and Light-Duty Truck Topcoat Operations,'' EPA-450/
3-88-018. The results of these panel testing procedures are in units of
mass of VOC per volume of coating solids deposited and must be
converted to a percent value for use in this subpart. If you panel test
representative coatings, then you may convert the panel test result for
each representative coating either to a unique percent capture
efficiency for each coating grouped with that representative coating by
using coating specific values for the volume of coating solids
deposited per volume of coating used, mass of VOC per volume of
coating, volume fraction solids, transfer efficiency, density and mass
fraction VOC in Equations 4 through 6 of this section; or to a
composite percent capture efficiency for the group of coatings by using
composite values for the group of coatings for the volume of coating
solids deposited per volume of coating used and for the mass of VOC per
volume of coating, and average values for the group of coatings for
volume fraction solids, transfer efficiency, density and mass fraction
VOC in Equations 4 through 6 of this section. If you panel test each
coating, then you must convert the panel test result for each coating
to a unique percent capture efficiency for that coating by using
coating specific values for the volume of coating solids deposited per
volume of coating used, mass of VOC per volume of coating, volume
fraction solids, transfer efficiency, density, and mass fraction VOC in
Equations 4 through 6 of this section. Panel test results expressed in
units of mass of VOC per volume of coating solids deposited must be
converted to percent capture efficiency using Equation 4 of this
section. An alternative for using panel test results expressed in units
of mass of VOC per mass of coating solids deposited is presented in
paragraph (e)(3) of this section.
* * * * *
    (2) * * *

    Wvocc,i = Mass fraction of VOC in coating, i, or
average mass fraction of VOC for the group of coatings, including
coating, i, kg VOC per kg coating, determined by EPA Method 24
(appendix A-7 to 40 CFR part 60) or the guidelines for combining
analytical VOC content and formulation solvent content presented in
Section 9 of ``Protocol for Determining Daily Volatile Organic
Compound Emission Rate of Automobile and Light-Duty Truck Topcoat
Operations,'' EPA-450/3-88-018 (Docket ID No. OAR-2002-0093 and
Docket ID No. A-2001-22).

    (3) * * *

    Wvocc,i = Mass fraction of VOC in coating, i, or
average mass fraction of VOC for the group of coatings, including
coating, i, kg VOC per kg coating, determined by EPA Method 24
(appendix A-7 to 40 CFR part 60) or the guidelines for combining
analytical VOC content and formulation solvent content presented in
Section 9 of ``Protocol for Determining Daily Volatile Organic
Compound Emission Rate of Automobile and Light-Duty Truck Topcoat
Operations,'' EPA-450/3-88-018 (Docket ID No. OAR-2002-0093 and
Docket ID No. A-2001-22).

    (4) * * *

    Ws, i = Mass fraction of coating solids for coating,
i, or average mass fraction of coating solids for the group of
coatings including coating, i, kg coating solids per kg coating,
determined by EPA Method 24 (appendix A-7 to 40 CFR part 60) or the
guidelines for combining analytical VOC content and formulation
solvent content presented in ``Protocol for Determining Daily
Volatile Organic Compound Emission Rate of Automobile and Light-Duty
Truck Topcoat Operations,'' EPA-450/3-88-018 (Docket ID No. OAR-
2002-0093 and Docket ID No. A-2001-22).

* * * * *
0
15. Section 63.3166 is amended by revising the introductory text and
paragraphs (a)(1) through (4) and (b) introductory text, and adding
paragraph (b)(4) to read as follows:

Sec.  63.3166  How do I determine the add-on control device emission
destruction or removal efficiency?

    You must use the procedures and test methods in this section to
determine the add-on control device emission destruction or removal
efficiency as part of the performance test required by Sec. Sec.
63.3160, 63.3163, or 63.3171. You must conduct three test runs as
specified in Sec.  63.7(e)(3), and each test run must last at least 1
hour.
    (a) * * *
    (1) Use EPA Method 1 or 1A of appendix A-1 to 40 CFR part 60, as
appropriate, to select sampling sites and velocity traverse points.
    (2) Use EPA Method 2, 2A, 2C, 2D, or 2F of appendix A-1, or 2G of
appendix A-2 to 40 CFR part 60, as appropriate, to measure gas
volumetric flow rate.
    (3) Use EPA Method 3, 3A, or 3B of appendix A-2 to 40 CFR part 60,
as appropriate, for gas analysis to determine dry molecular weight. The
ANSI/ASME PTC 19.10-1981, ``Flue and Exhaust Gas Analyses [Part 10,
Instruments and Apparatus]'' (incorporated by reference, see Sec.
63.14), may be used as an alternative to EPA Method 3B.
    (4) Use EPA Method 4 of appendix A-3 to 40 CFR part 60 to determine
stack gas moisture.
* * * * *
    (b) Measure total gaseous organic mass emissions as carbon at the
inlet and outlet of the add-on control device simultaneously, using
either EPA Method 25 or 25A of appendix A-7 to 40 CFR part 60, as
specified in paragraphs (b)(1) through (4) of this section. You must
use the same method for both the inlet and outlet measurements.
* * * * *
    (4) You may use EPA Method 18 of appendix A-6 to 40 CFR part 60 to
subtract methane emissions from measured total gaseous organic mass
emissions as carbon.
* * * * *
0
16. Section 63.3167 is amended by revising the section heading,
introductory text, and paragraph (f)(1) to read as follows:

Sec.  63.3167  How do I establish the add-on control device operating
limits during performance tests?

    During the performance tests required by Sec. Sec.  63.3160,
63.3163, and 63.3171 (and described in Sec. Sec.  63.3164 and 63.3166),
you must establish the operating limits required by Sec.  63.3093
according to this section, unless you have received approval for
alternative monitoring and operating limits under Sec.  63.8(f) as
specified in Sec.  63.3093.
* * * * *
    (f) * * *
    (1) During the capture efficiency determination required by
Sec. Sec.  63.3160 and 63.3163 and described in Sec. Sec.  63.3164 and
63.3165, you must monitor and record either the gas volumetric flow
rate or the duct static pressure for each separate capture device in
your emission capture system at least once every 15 minutes during each
of the three test runs at a point in the duct between the capture
device and the add-on control device inlet.
* * * * *
0
17. Section 63.3168 is amended by revising paragraphs (a)(4) through
(7) and (c)(3) introductory text to read as follows:

Sec.  63.3168  What are the requirements for continuous parameter
monitoring system installation, operation, and maintenance?

    (a) * * *
    (4) You must maintain the CPMS at all times in accordance with
Sec.  63.3100(d) and have readily available necessary parts for routine
repairs of the monitoring equipment.
    (5) Before [date 181 days after date of publication of final rule
in the Federal Register], you must operate the CPMS and collect
emission capture system and add-on control device parameter data at all
times that a controlled coating operation is operating, except during
monitoring malfunctions, associated repairs, and required quality
assurance or control activities (including, if applicable, calibration
checks and required zero and span adjustments). On and after [date 181
days after date of publication of final rule in the Federal Register],
you must operate the CPMS and collect emission capture system and add-
on control device parameter data at all times that a controlled coating
operation is operating in accordance with Sec.  63.3100(d).
    (6) Before [date 181 days after date of publication of final rule
in the Federal Register], you must not use emission capture system or
add-on control device parameter data recorded during monitoring
malfunctions, associated repairs, out-of-control periods, or required
quality assurance or control activities when calculating data averages.
You must use all the data collected during all other periods in
calculating the data averages for determining compliance with the
emission capture system and add-on control device operating limits. On
and after [date 181 days after date of publication of final rule in the
Federal Register], startups and shutdowns are normal operation for this
source category. Emissions from these activities are to be included
when determining if the standards specified in Sec. Sec.  63.3090,
63.3091, 63.3092, 63.4292, and 63.4293 are being attained. You must not
use emission capture system or add-on control device parameter data
recorded during monitoring malfunctions, associated repairs, out-of-
control periods, or required quality assurance or control activities
when calculating data averages. You must use all the data collected
during all other periods in calculating the data averages for
determining compliance with the emission capture system and add-on
control device operating limits.
    (7) A monitoring malfunction is any sudden, infrequent, not
reasonably preventable failure of the CPMS to provide valid data.
Monitoring failures that are caused in part by poor maintenance or
careless operation are not malfunctions. Before [date 181 days after
date of publication of final rule in the Federal Register], any period
for which the monitoring system is out of control and data are not
available for required calculations is a deviation from the monitoring
requirements. On and after [date 181 days after date of publication of
final rule in the Federal Register], except for periods of required
quality assurance or control activities, any period during which the
CPMS fails to operate and record data continuously as required by
paragraph (a)(1) of this section, or generates data that cannot be
included in calculating averages as specified in paragraph (a)(7) of
this section constitutes a deviation from the monitoring requirements.
* * * * *
    (c) * * *
    (3) For all thermal oxidizers and catalytic oxidizers, you must
meet the requirements in paragraphs (a)(1) through (6) and (c)(3)(i)
through (vii) of this section for each gas temperature monitoring
device. For the purposes of this paragraph (c)(3), a thermocouple is
part of the temperature sensor.
* * * * *
0
18. Section 63.3171 is amended by revising paragraphs (a) and (e)(3) to
read as follows:

Sec.  63.3171  How do I demonstrate initial compliance?

    (a) You must meet all of the requirements of this section to
demonstrate initial compliance. To demonstrate initial compliance, the
organic HAP emissions from the combined primer-surfacer, topcoat, final
repair, glass bonding primer, and glass bonding adhesive operations
plus all coatings and thinners, except for deadener materials and for
adhesive and sealer materials that are not components of glass bonding
systems, used in coating operations added to the affected source
pursuant to Sec.  63.3082(c) must meet the applicable emission
limitation in Sec.  63.3090(b) or Sec.  63.3091(b); the organic HAP
emissions from the electrodeposition primer operation must meet the
applicable emissions limitations in Sec.  63.3092(a) or (b); and you
must meet the applicable operating limits and work practice standards
in Sec. Sec.  63.3093 and 63.3094.
* * * * *
    (e) * * *
    (3) Information from the supplier or manufacturer of the material.
You may rely on information other than that generated by the test
methods specified in paragraphs (e)(1) and (2) of this section, such as
manufacturer's formulation data, if it represents each organic HAP in
Table 5 to this subpart that is present at 0.1 percent by mass, and at
1.0 percent by mass or more for other compounds. If there is a
disagreement between such information and results of a test conducted
according to paragraph (e)(1) or (2) of this section, then the test
method results will take precedence unless after consultation, the
facility demonstrates to the satisfaction of the enforcement authority
that the facility's data are correct.
* * * * *
0
19. Section 63.3176 is amended by revising the definition of
``Deviation'' to read as follows:

Sec.  63.3176  What definitions apply to this subpart?

* * * * *
    Deviation means:
    (1) Before [date 181 days after date of publication of final rule
in the Federal Register], any instance in which an affected source
subject to this subpart or an owner or operator of such a source:
    (i) Fails to meet any requirement or obligation established by this
subpart including but not limited to any emission limit, operating
limit, or work practice standard;
    (ii) Fails to meet any term or condition that is adopted to
implement an applicable requirement in this subpart and that is
included in the operating permit for any affected source required to
obtain such a permit; or
    (iii) Fails to meet any emission limit or operating limit or work
practice standard in this subpart during startup, shutdown, or
malfunction, regardless of whether or not such failure is permitted by
this subpart; and
    (2) On and after [date 181 days after date of publication of final
rule in the Federal Register], any instance in which an affected source
subject to this subpart or an owner or operator of such a source:
    (i) Fails to meet any requirement or obligation established by this
subpart including but not limited to any emission limit, operating
limit, or work practice standard; or
    (ii) Fails to meet any term or condition that is adopted to
implement an applicable requirement in this subpart and that is
included in the operating permit for any affected source required to
obtain such a permit.
* * * * *
0
20. Table 2 to subpart IIII of part 63 is revised to read as follows:

       Table 2 to Subpart IIII of Part 63--Applicability of General Provisions to Subpart IIII of Part 63
      You must comply with the applicable General Provisions requirements according to the following table:
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
                                                                 Applicable to subpart
               Citation                        Subject                    IIII                 Explanation
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Sec.   63.1(a)(1)-(12)...............  General Applicability..  Yes....................
Sec.   63.1(b)(1)-(3)................  Initial Applicability    Yes....................  Applicability to
                                        Determination.                                    subpart IIII is also
                                                                                specified in Sec.
                                                                                63.3081.
Sec.   63.1(c)(1)....................  Applicability After      Yes....................
                                        Standard Established.
Sec.   63.1(c)(2)....................  Applicability of Permit  No.....................  Area sources are not
                                        Program for Area                                  subject to subpart
                                        Sources.                                          IIII.
Sec.   63.1(c)(5)....................  Extensions and           Yes....................
                                        Notifications.
Sec.   63.1(e).......................  Applicability of Permit  Yes....................
                                        Program Before
                                        Relevant Standard is
                                        Set.
Sec.   63.2..........................  Definitions............  Yes....................  Additional definitions
                                                                                are specified in Sec.
                                                                                63.3176.
Sec.   63.3..........................  Units and Abbreviations  Yes....................
Sec.   63.4(a)(1)-(2)................  Prohibited Activities..  Yes....................
Sec.   63.4(b)-(c)...................  Circumvention/           Yes....................
                                        Fragmentation.
Sec.   63.5(a).......................  Preconstruction Review   Yes....................
                                        Applicability.
Sec.   63.5(b)(1), (3), (4), (6).....  Requirements for         Yes....................
                                        Existing, Newly
                                        Constructed, and
                                        Reconstructed Sources.
Sec.   63.5(d)(1)(i)-(ii)(F),          Application for          Yes....................
 (d)(1)(ii)(H), (d)(1)(ii)(J),          Approval of
 (d)(1)(iii), (d)(2)-(4).               Construction/
                                        Reconstruction.
Sec.   63.5(e).......................  Approval of              Yes....................
                                        Construction/
                                        Reconstruction.
Sec.   63.5(f).......................  Approval of              Yes....................
                                        Construction/
                                        Reconstruction Based
                                        on Prior State Review.
Sec.   63.6(a).......................  Compliance With          Yes....................
                                        Standards and
                                        Maintenance
                                        Requirements--Applicab
                                        ility.
Sec.   63.6(b)(1)-(5), (b)(7)........  Compliance Dates for     Yes....................  Section 63.3083
                                        New and Reconstructed                             specifies the
                                        Sources.                                          compliance dates.
Sec.   63.6(c)(1), (2), (5)..........  Compliance Dates for     Yes....................  Section 63.3083
                                        Existing Sources.                                 specifies the
                                                                                compliance dates.
Sec.   63.6(e)(1)(i)-(ii)............  Operation and            Yes before [date 181     See Sec.   63.3100(d)
                                        Maintenance.             days after date of       for general duty
                                                                 publication of final     requirement.
                                                                 rule in the Federal
                                                                 Register]. No on and
                                                                 after [date 181 days
                                                                 after date of
                                                                 publication of final
                                                                 rule in the Federal
                                                                 Register].
Sec.   63.6(e)(1)(iii)...............  Operation and            Yes....................  .......................
                                        Maintenance.
Sec.   63.6(e)(3)(i), (e)(3)(iii)-     SSMP...................  Yes before [date 181     .......................
 (ix).                                                           days after date of
                                                                 publication of final
                                                                 rule in the Federal
                                                                 Register]. No on and
                                                                 after [date 181 days
                                                                 after date of
                                                                 publication of final
                                                                 rule in the Federal
                                                                 Register].
Sec.   63.6(f)(1)....................  Compliance Except        Yes before [date 181
                                        During Startup,          days after date of
                                        Shutdown, and            publication of final
                                        Malfunction.             rule in the Federal
                                                                 Register]. No on and
                                                                 after [date 181 days
                                                                 after date of
                                                                 publication of final
                                                                 rule in the Federal
                                                                 Register].
Sec.   63.6(f)(2)-(3)................  Methods for Determining  Yes....................
                                        Compliance.
Sec.   63.6(g).......................  Use of an Alternative    Yes....................
                                        Standard.
Sec.   63.6(h).......................  Compliance With Opacity/ No.....................  Subpart IIII does not
                                        Visible Emission                                  establish opacity
                                        Standards.                                        standards and does not
                                                                                require continuous
                                                                                opacity monitoring
                                                                                systems (COMS).
Sec.   63.6(i)(1)-(14)...............  Extension of Compliance  Yes....................
63.6(j)..............................  Presidential Compliance  Yes....................
                                        Exemption.
Sec.   63.7(a)(1)....................  Performance Test         Yes....................  Applies to all affected
                                        Requirements--Applicab                            sources. Additional
                                        ility.                                            requirements for
                                                                                performance testing
                                                                                are specified in Sec.
                                                                                Sec.   63.3164 and
                                                                                63.3166.

Sec.   63.7(a)(2) except (a)(2)(i)-    Performance Test         Yes....................  Applies only to
 (viii).                                Requirements--Dates.                              performance tests for
                                                                                capture system and
                                                                                control device
                                                                                efficiency at sources
                                                                                using these to comply
                                                                                with the standards.
                                                                                Section 63.3160
                                                                                specifies the schedule
                                                                                for performance test
                                                                                requirements that are
                                                                                earlier than those
                                                                                specified in Sec.
                                                                                63.7(a)(2).
Sec.   63.7(a)(3)-(4)................  Performance Tests        Yes....................
                                        Required By the
                                        Administrator, Force
                                        Majeure.
Sec.   63.7(b)-(d)...................  Performance Test         Yes....................  Applies only to
                                        Requirements--Notifica                            performance tests for
                                        tion, Quality                                     capture system and add-
                                        Assurance, Facilities                             on control device
                                        Necessary for Safe                                efficiency at sources
                                        Testing Conditions                                using these to comply
                                        During Test.                                      with the standards.
Sec.   63.7(e)(1)....................  Conduct of performance   Yes before [date 181     See Sec.   63.3164.
                                        tests.                   days after date of
                                                                 publication of final
                                                                 rule in the Federal
                                                                 Register]. No on and
                                                                 after [date 181 days
                                                                 after date of
                                                                 publication of final
                                                                 rule in the Federal
                                                                 Register].
Sec.   63.7(e)(2)-(4)................  Conduct of performance   Yes....................
                                        tests.
Sec.   63.7(f).......................  Performance Test         Yes....................  Applies to all test
                                        Requirements--Use of                              methods except those
                                        Alternative Test                                  used to determine
                                        Method.                                           capture system
                                                                                efficiency.
Sec.   63.7(g)-(h)...................  Performance Test         Yes....................  Applies only to
                                        Requirements--Data                                performance tests for
                                        Analysis,                                         capture system and add-
                                        Recordkeeping,                                    on control device
                                        Reporting, Waiver of                              efficiency at sources
                                        Test.                                             using these to comply
                                                                                with the standards.
Sec.   63.8(a)(1)-(2)................  Monitoring               Yes....................  Applies only to
                                        Requirements--Applicab                            monitoring of capture
                                        ility.                                            system and add-on
                                                                                control device
                                                                                efficiency at sources
                                                                                using these to comply
                                                                                with the standards.
                                                                                Additional
                                                                                requirements for
                                                                                monitoring are
                                                                                specified in Sec.
                                                                                63.3168.
Sec.   63.8(a)(4)....................  Additional Monitoring    No.....................  Subpart IIII does not
                                        Requirements.                                     have monitoring
                                                                                requirements for
                                                                                flares.
Sec.   63.8(b).......................  Conduct of Monitoring..  Yes....................
Sec.   63.8(c)(1)....................  Continuous Monitoring    Yes before [date 181     Section 63.3168
                                        Systems (CMS)            days after date of       specifies the
                                        Operation and            publication of final     requirements for the
                                        Maintenance.             rule in the Federal      operation of CMS for
                                                                 Register]. No on and     capture systems and
                                                                 after [date 181 days     add-on control devices
                                                                 after date of            at sources using these
                                                                 publication of final     to comply.
                                                                 rule in the Federal
                                                                 Register].
63.8(c)(2)-(3).......................  CMS Operation and        Yes....................  Applies only to
                                        Maintenance.                                      monitoring of capture
                                                                                system and add-on
                                                                                control device
                                                                                efficiency at sources
                                                                                using these to comply
                                                                                with the standards.
                                                                                Additional
                                                                                requirements for CMS
                                                                                operations and
                                                                                maintenance are
                                                                                specified in Sec.
                                                                                63.3168.
Sec.   63.8(c)(4)....................  CMS....................  No.....................  Section 63.3168
                                                                                specifies the
                                                                                requirements for the
                                                                                operation of CMS for
                                                                                capture systems and
                                                                                add-on control devices
                                                                                at sources using these
                                                                                to comply with the
                                                                                standards.
Sec.   63.89(c)(5)...................  COMS...................  No.....................  Subpart IIII does not
                                                                                have opacity or
                                                                                visible emission
                                                                                standards.

Sec.   63.8(c)(6)....................  CMS Requirements.......  No.....................  Section 63.3168
                                                                                specifies the
                                                                                requirements for
                                                                                monitoring systems for
                                                                                capture systems and
                                                                                add-on control devices
                                                                                at sources using these
                                                                                to comply with the
                                                                                standards.
Sec.   63.8(c)(7)....................  CMS Out-of-Control       Yes....................
                                        Periods.
Sec.   63.8(c)(8)....................  CMS Out-of-Control       No.....................  Section 63.3120
                                        Periods Reporting.                                requires reporting of
                                                                                CMS out-of-control
                                                                                periods.
Sec.   63.8(d)-(e)...................  Quality Control Program  No.....................  Subpart IIII does not
                                        and CMS Performance                               require the use of
                                        Evaluation.                                       continuous emissions
                                                                                monitoring systems
                                                                                (CEMS).
Sec.   63.8(f)(1)-(5)................  Use of an Alternative    Yes....................
                                        Monitoring Method.
Sec.   63.8(f)(6)....................  Alternative to Relative  No.....................  Subpart IIII does not
                                        Accuracy Test.                                    require the use of
                                                                                CEMS.
Sec.   63.8(g).......................  Data Reduction.........  No.....................  Sections 63.3167 and
                                                                                63.3168 specify
                                                                                monitoring data
                                                                                reduction.
Sec.   63.9(a).......................  Notification             Yes....................
                                        Requirements.
Sec.   63.9(b)(1)-(2)................  Initial Notifications..  Yes....................
Sec.   63.9(b)(4)(i), (b)(4)(v),       Application for          Yes....................
 (b)(5).                                Approval of
                                        Construction or
                                        Reconstruction.
Sec.   63.9(c).......................  Request for Extension    Yes....................
                                        of Compliance.
Sec.   63.9(d).......................  Special Compliance       Yes....................
                                        Requirement
                                        Notification.
Sec.   63.9(e).......................  Notification of          Yes....................  Applies only to capture
                                        Performance Test.                                 system and add-on
                                                                                control device
                                                                                performance tests at
                                                                                sources using these to
                                                                                comply with the
                                                                                standards.
Sec.   63.9(f).......................  Notification of Visible  No.....................  Subpart IIII does not
                                        Emissions/Opacity Test.                           have opacity or
                                                                                visible emission
                                                                                standards.
Sec.   63.9(g).......................  Additional               No.....................  Subpart IIII does not
                                        Notifications When                                require the use of
                                        Using CMS.                                        CEMS.
Sec.   63.9(h)(1)-(3)................  Notification of          Yes....................  Section 63.3110
                                        Compliance Status.                                specifies the dates
                                                                                for submitting the
                                                                                notification of
                                                                                compliance status.
Sec.   63.9(h)(5)-(6)................  Clarifications.........  Yes....................
Sec.   63.9(i).......................  Adjustment of Submittal  Yes....................
                                        Deadlines.
Sec.   63.9(j).......................  Change in Previous       Yes....................
                                        Information.
Sec.   63.10(a)......................  Recordkeeping/           Yes....................
                                        Reporting--Applicabili
                                        ty and General
                                        Information.
Sec.   63.10(b)(1)...................  General Recordkeeping    Yes....................  Additional requirements
                                        Requirements.                                     are specified in Sec.
                                                                                Sec.   63.3130 and
                                                                                63.3131.
Sec.   63.10(b)(2)(i)-(ii)...........  Recordkeeping of         Yes before [date 181     See 63.3130(g).
                                        Occurrence and           days after date of
                                        Duration of Startups     publication of final
                                        and Shutdowns and of     rule in the Federal
                                        Failures to Meet         Register]. No on and
                                        Standards.               after [date 181 days
                                                                 after date of
                                                                 publication of final
                                                                 rule in the Federal
                                                                 Register].
Sec.   63.10(b)(2)(iii)..............  Recordkeeping Relevant   Yes....................
                                        to Maintenance of Air
                                        Pollution Control and
                                        Monitoring Equipment.
Sec.   63.10(b)(2)(iv)-(v)...........  Actions Taken to         Yes before [date 181     See Sec.
                                        Minimize Emissions       days after date of       63.3130(g)(4) for a
                                        During SSM.              publication of final     record of actions
                                                                 rule in the Federal      taken to minimize
                                                                 Register]. No on and     emissions during a
                                                                 after [date 181 days     deviation from the
                                                                 after date of            standard.
                                                                 publication of final
                                                                 rule in the Federal