[Federal Register: July 30, 2009 (Volume 74, Number 145)]
[Notices]
[Page 38003-38004]
[DOCID:fr30jy09-55]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission

[Project No. 13528-000--Alaska; Soule River Hydroelectric Project]

Soule Hydro, LLC; Notice of Proposed Restricted Service List for
a Programmatic Agreement for Managing Properties Included in or
Eligible for Inclusion in the National Register of Historic Places

July 23, 2009.
    Rule 2010 of the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission's
(Commission) Rules of Practice and Procedure provides that, to
eliminate unnecessary expense or improve administrative efficiency, the
Secretary may establish a restricted service list for a particular
phase or issue in a proceeding.\1\ The restricted service list should
contain the names of persons on the service list who, in the judgment
of the decisional authority establishing the list, are active
participants with respect to the phase or issue in the proceeding for
which the list is established.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \1\ 18 CFR section 385.2010.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    The Commission staff is consulting with the Alaska State Historic
Preservation Officer (hereinafter, SHPO) and the Advisory Council on
Historic Preservation (hereinafter, Council) pursuant to the Council's
regulations, 36 CFR Part 800, implementing section 106 of the National
Historic Preservation Act, as amended, (16 U.S.C. section 470f), to
prepare and execute a programmatic agreement for managing properties
included in, or eligible for inclusion in, the National Register of
Historic Places at the Soule River Hydroelectric Project No. 13528-
000.\2\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \2\ Previously, the project was given Project No. 12615-001.
Upon issuance of a new preliminary permit on July 1, 2009, the
project was given Project No. 13528-000.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    The programmatic agreement, when executed by the Commission and the
SHPO, would satisfy the Commission's section 106 responsibilities for
all individual undertakings carried out in accordance with the license
until the license expires or is terminated (36 CFR 800.13[e]). The
Commission's responsibilities, pursuant to section 106 for the Soule
River Hydroelectric Project, would be fulfilled through the
programmatic agreement, which the Commission proposes to draft in
consultation with certain parties listed below. The executed
programmatic agreement would be incorporated into any Order issuing a
license.
    Soule Hydro, LLC, as applicant for the Soule River Hydroelectric
Project No. 13528-000, is invited to participate in consultations to
develop the programmatic agreement.
    For the purpose of commenting on the programmatic agreement, we
propose to restrict the service list for the aforementioned project as
follows:

Don Klima or Representative, Advisory Council on Historic Preservation,
The Old Post Office Building, 1100 Pennsylvania Avenue, NW., Suite 803,
Washington, DC 20004.
Glen Martin or Representative, Alaska Power & Telephone Company, 193
Otto Street, P.O. Box 3222, Port Townsend, WA 98368.
T. Weber Greiser, Historical Research Associates, Inc., 125 Bank
Street, Suite 500, Missoula, MT 59802.
Norman Gross, Director, or Representative, Soule Hydro, LLC, 11978
Artery Drive, Fairfax, VA 22030.
Judith Bittner, SHPO or Representative, Office of History &
Archaeology, 550 W. 7th Avenue, Suite 1310, Anchorage, AK 99501.
Martin Stanford or Representative, U.S. Forest Service, 3031 Tongass
Avenue, Ketchikan, AK 99901.
John Autrey or Representative, U.S. Forest Service, 648 Mission Street,
Ketchikan, AK 99901.

    Any person on the official service list for the above-captioned
proceeding may request inclusion on the restricted service list, or may
request that a restricted service list not be established, by filing a
motion to that effect within 15 days of this notice date. In a request
for inclusion, please identify the reason(s) why there is an interest
to be included. Also, please identify any concerns about historic
properties, including properties of traditional religious and cultural
importance to an Indian tribe. If historic properties would

be identified within the motion, please use a separate page, and label
it NON-PUBLIC Information.
    The original and 8 copies of any such motion must be filed with
Kimberly D. Bose, Secretary of the Commission, 888 First Street, NE.,
Washington, DC 20426, and must be served on each person whose name
appears on the official service list. Please put the following on the
first page: Soule River Hydroelectric Project No. 13528-000. Motions
may be filed electronically via the Internet in lieu of paper. The
Commission strongly encourages electronic filings. See 18 CFR
385.2001(a)(1)(iii) and the instructions on the Commission's Web site
(http://www.ferc.gov) under the ``e-Filing'' link.
    If no such motions are filed, the restricted service list will be
effective at the end of the 15-day period. Otherwise, a further notice
will be issued ruling on any motion or motions filed within the 15-day
period.

Kimberly D. Bose,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. E9-18153 Filed 7-29-09; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 6717-01-P


[Federal Register Volume 77, Number 220 (Wednesday, November 14, 2012)]
[Notices]
[Pages 67862-67863]
[FR Doc No: 2012-27662]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION

Federal Aviation Administration

Public Notice for Waiver of Aeronautical Land-Use Assurance; J.
Douglas Bake Memorial Airport (OCQ) Oconto, WI

AGENCY: Federal Aviation Administration, DOT.

ACTION: Notice of intent of waiver with respect to land.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) is considering a
proposal to authorize the release of 0.32 acres of airport property
(Parcel No. 18) at the J. Douglas Bake Memorial Airport, Oconto, WI.
    Parcel No. 18 is located outside of the airport fence along the
west edge of the airport and contains a part of a road used to access a
land-locked parcel of private property located adjacent to the airport.
Using the piece of airport property as an uncontrolled access road has
resulted in a non-aeronautical use of

airport property and a compliance issue for the airport. In addition,
the uncontrolled access raises liability concerns for the airport. The
land release would bring the airport into compliance with grant
assurances and assure compatible land use. It would also remove the
liability issue related to the unauthorized use of the access road.
    A categorical exclusion for this land release action was prepared
by Wisconsin Dept. of Transportation-Bureau of Aeronautics and issued
on June 22, 2011.
    The aforementioned land is not needed for aeronautical use. The
parcel is depicted on the Airport Layout Plan and Exhibit ``A''
property map dated July 12, 2011. There are no impacts to the airport
by allowing the airport to dispose of this parcel.
    The subject parcel was originally acquired on September 10, 2002,
as part of Airport Improvement Program grant No. 04 and is described in
the warranty deed recorded in Volume 933 pages 480-481, Oconto County,
Wisconsin. The value of the parcel is $600.
    In accordance with section 47107(h) of title 49, United States
Code, this notice is required to be published in the Federal Register
30 days before modifying the land-use assurance that requires the
property to be used for an aeronautical purpose.

DATES: Comments must be received on or before December 14, 2012.

ADDRESSES: Mr. Daniel J. Millenacker, Program Manager, Federal Aviation
Administration, Airports District Office, 6020 28th Avenue South, Room
102, Minneapolis, MN 55450-2706. Telephone Number<PHONE_NUMBER>; FAX
Number<PHONE_NUMBER>; email address<EMAIL_ADDRESS>
Documents reflecting this FAA action may be reviewed at the following
locations: Federal Aviation Administration, Minneapolis Airports
District Office, 6020 28th Avenue South, Room 102, Minneapolis, MN
55450-2706; or Wisconsin Department of Transportation, 4802 Sheboygan
Ave., Room 701, Madison, WI 53707.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Mr. Daniel J. Millenacker, Program
Manager, Federal Aviation Administration, Airports District Office,
6020 28th Avenue South, Room 102, Minneapolis, MN 55450-2706. Telephone
Number<PHONE_NUMBER>; FAX Number<PHONE_NUMBER>; email address
<EMAIL_ADDRESS>
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Following is a legal description of the
subject airport property to be released at the J. Douglas Bake Memorial
Airport in Oconto, Wisconsin:
    Part of Government Lot 3, Section 26, Township 28 North, Range 21
East, Town of Oconto, Oconto County, Wisconsin.
    Commencing at the North Quarter corner of Section 26; Thence South
87 degrees 35 minutes 26 seconds West, along the north line of section
26, a distance of 1333.25 feet; Thence South 00 degrees 22 minutes 17
seconds West along the west line of Government Lot 3, distance of
685.43 feet to the Point of Beginning. Thence continuing South 00
degrees 22 minutes 17 seconds West a distance of 504.34 feet; Thence
South 89 degrees 36 minutes 17 seconds East a distance of 55.89 feet;
Thence North 05 degrees 57 minutes 09 seconds West a distance of 507.45
feet to the Point of Beginning. Said parcel containing 0.32 Acres/
14,094.3 Square Feet of land more or less.
    Said parcel subject to all easements, restrictions, and
reservations of record.

    Issued in Minneapolis, MN, on October 15, 2012.
Steven J. Obenauer,
Manager, Minneapolis Airports District Office, FAA, Great Lakes Region.
[FR Doc. 2012-27662 Filed 11-13-12; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910-13-P


[Federal Register Volume 79, Number 1 (Thursday, January 2, 2014)]
[Notices]
[Pages 132-133]
[FR Doc No: 2013-31337]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission

[Docket No. ER14-722-000]

Utility Expense Reduction, LLC; Supplemental Notice That Initial
Market-Based Rate Filing Includes Request for Blanket Section 204
Authorization

    This is a supplemental notice in the above-referenced proceeding of
Utility Expense Reduction, LLC's application for market-based rate
authority, with an accompanying rate tariff, noting that such
application includes a request for blanket authorization, under 18 CFR
Part 34, of future issuances of securities and assumptions of
liability.
    Any person desiring to intervene or to protest should file with the
Federal Energy Regulatory Commission, 888 First Street NE., Washington,
DC 20426, in accordance with Rules 211 and 214 of the Commission's
Rules of Practice and Procedure (18 CFR 385.211 and 385.214). Anyone
filing a motion to intervene or protest must serve a copy of that
document on the Applicant.
    Notice is hereby given that the deadline for filing protests with
regard

to the applicant's request for blanket authorization, under 18 CFR Part
34, of future issuances of securities and assumptions of liability, is
January 13, 2014.
    The Commission encourages electronic submission of protests and
interventions in lieu of paper, using the FERC Online links at http://www.ferc.gov. To facilitate electronic service, persons with Internet
access who will eFile a document and/or be listed as a contact for an
intervenor must create and validate an eRegistration account using the
eRegistration link. Select the eFiling link to log on and submit the
intervention or protests.
    Persons unable to file electronically should submit an original and
5 copies of the intervention or protest to the Federal Energy
Regulatory Commission, 888 First Street NE., Washington, DC 20426.
    The filings in the above-referenced proceeding are accessible in
the Commission's eLibrary system by clicking on the appropriate link in
the above list. They are also available for review in the Commission's
Public Reference Room in Washington, DC. There is an eSubscription link
on the Web site that enables subscribers to receive email notification
when a document is added to a subscribed docket(s). For assistance with
any FERC Online service, please email<EMAIL_ADDRESS>or
call<PHONE_NUMBER> (toll free). For TTY, call<PHONE_NUMBER>.

    Dated: December 24, 2013.
Kimberly D. Bose,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2013-31337 Filed 12-31-13; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6717-01-P


[Federal Register Volume 84, Number 201 (Thursday, October 17, 2019)]
[Notices]
[Pages 55569-55570]
[FR Doc No: 2019-22663]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission

Combined Notice of Filings #1

    Take notice that the Commission received the following electric
rate filings:
    Docket Numbers: ER19-2619-001.
    Applicants: Midcontinent Independent System Operator, Inc.
    Description: Tariff Amendment: 2019-10-10_Request for deferral of
action on Fast AGC filing to be effective 12/31/9998.
    Filed Date: 10/10/19.
    Accession Number: 20191010-5021.
    Comments Due: 5 p.m. ET 10/31/19.

    Docket Numbers: ER20-66-000.
    Applicants: PJM Interconnection, L.L.C.
    Description: Tariff Cancellation: Notice of Cancellation of ISA/SA
No. 3984; Queue No. R52A to be effective 11/11/2019.
    Filed Date: 10/9/19.
    Accession Number: 20191009-5168.
    Comments Due: 5 p.m. ET 10/30/19.

    Docket Numbers: ER20-67-000.
    Applicants: Evergy Kansas Central, Inc.
    Description: Sec.  205(d) Rate Filing: Notice of Succession, Market
Based Rate Tariff to be effective 12/9/2019.
    Filed Date: 10/10/19.
    Accession Number: 20191010-5000.
    Comments Due: 5 p.m. ET 10/31/19.

    Docket Numbers: ER20-68-000.
    Applicants: Evergy Generating, Inc.
    Description: Sec.  205(d) Rate Filing: Notice of Succession,
Purchase Power Agreement to be effective 12/9/2019.
    Filed Date: 10/10/19.
    Accession Number: 20191010-5001.
    Comments Due: 5 p.m. ET 10/31/19.

    Docket Numbers: ER20-69-000.
    Applicants: Silver Lake Solar, LLC.
    Description: Petition for Limited Waiver of Silver Lake Solar, LLC.
    Filed Date: 10/9/19.
    Accession Number: 20191009-5185.
    Comments Due: 5 p.m. ET 10/23/19.

    Docket Numbers: ER20-70-000.
    Applicants: Alabama Power Company.
    Description: Sec.  205(d) Rate Filing: Charlton Solar Energy Center
(Charlton Solar) LGIA Filing to be effective 9/26/2019.
    Filed Date: 10/10/19.
    Accession Number: 20191010-5038.
    Comments Due: 5 p.m. ET 10/31/19.

    Docket Numbers: ER20-71-000.
    Applicants: Coachella Hills Wind, LLC.
    Description: Baseline eTariff Filing: MBR Application to be
effective 12/10/2019.
    Filed Date: 10/10/19.
    Accession Number: 20191010-5039.
    Comments Due: 5 p.m. ET 10/31/19.

    Docket Numbers: ER20-72-000.
    Applicants: Coachella Wind Holdings, LLC.
    Description: Baseline eTariff Filing: MBR Application to be
effective 12/10/2019.
    Filed Date: 10/10/19.
    Accession Number: 20191010-5040.
    Comments Due: 5 p.m. ET 10/31/19.

    Docket Numbers: ER20-73-000.
    Applicants: Midcontinent Independent System Operator, Inc.
    Description: Sec.  205(d) Rate Filing: 2019-10-11_Attachment L FTR
Credit Filing to be effective 6/1/2020.
    Filed Date: 10/10/19.
    Accession Number: 20191010-5041.
    Comments Due: 5 p.m. ET 10/31/19.

    Docket Numbers: ER20-74-000.
    Applicants: Desert Hot Springs, LLC.
    Description: Baseline eTariff Filing: MBR Application to be
effective 12/10/2019.

    Filed Date: 10/10/19.
    Accession Number: 20191010-5042.
    Comments Due: 5 p.m. ET 10/31/19.

    Docket Numbers: ER20-75-000.
    Applicants: Oasis Alta, LLC.
    Description: Baseline eTariff Filing: MBR Application to be
effective 12/10/2019.
    Filed Date: 10/10/19.
    Accession Number: 20191010-5043.
    Comments Due: 5 p.m. ET 10/31/19.

    Docket Numbers: ER20-76-000.
    Applicants: Oasis Plains Wind, LLC.
    Description: Baseline eTariff Filing: MBR Application to be
effective 12/10/2019.
    Filed Date: 10/10/19.
    Accession Number: 20191010-5044.
    Comments Due: 5 p.m. ET 10/31/19.

    Docket Numbers: ER20-77-000.
    Applicants: Painted Hills Wind Holdings, LLC.
    Description: Baseline eTariff Filing: MBR Application to be
effective 12/10/2019.
    Filed Date: 10/10/19.
    Accession Number: 20191010-5046.
    Comments Due: 5 p.m. ET 10/31/19.

    Docket Numbers: ER20-78-000.
    Applicants: San Jacinto Wind II, LLC.
    Description: Baseline eTariff Filing: MBR Application to be
effective 12/10/2019.
    Filed Date: 10/10/19.
    Accession Number: 20191010-5047.
    Comments Due: 5 p.m. ET 10/31/19.

    Docket Numbers: ER20-79-000.
    Applicants: Voyager Wind IV Expansion, LLC.
    Description: Baseline eTariff Filing: MBR Application to be
effective 12/10/2019.
    Filed Date: 10/10/19.
    Accession Number: 20191010-5048.
    Comments Due: 5 p.m. ET 10/31/19.

    Docket Numbers: ER20-80-000.
    Applicants: Meadow Lake Wind Farm VI LLC,
    Description: Baseline eTariff Filing: Reactive Power Compensation
Filing to be effective 12/9/2019.
    Filed Date: 10/10/19.
    Accession Number: 20191010-5064.
    Comments Due: 5 p.m. ET 10/31/19.

    Docket Numbers: ER20-81-000.
    Applicants: Midcontinent Independent System Operator, Inc.
    Description: Sec.  205(d) Rate Filing: 2019-10-10_SA 2527 ITC-
Consumers Energy 4th Rev GIA (J161 J752) to be effective 9/25/2019.
    Filed Date: 10/10/19.
    Accession Number: 20191010-5084.
    Comments Due: 5 p.m. ET 10/31/19.

    Docket Numbers: ER20-82-000.
    Applicants: PacifiCorp.
    Description: Sec.  205(d) Rate Filing: 3 Phases Renewables (OR
D.A.) Rev 2 to be effective 10/1/2019.
    Filed Date: 10/10/19.
    Accession Number: 20191010-5103.
    Comments Due: 5 p.m. ET 10/31/19.

    The filings are accessible in the Commission's eLibrary system by
clicking on the links or querying the docket number.
    Any person desiring to intervene or protest in any of the above
proceedings must file in accordance with Rules 211 and 214 of the
Commission's Regulations (18 CFR 385.211 and 385.214) on or before 5:00
p.m. Eastern time on the specified comment date. Protests may be
considered, but intervention is necessary to become a party to the
proceeding.
    eFiling is encouraged. More detailed information relating to filing
requirements, interventions, protests, service, and qualifying
facilities filings can be found at: http://www.ferc.gov/docs-filing/efiling/filing-req.pdf. For other information, call<PHONE_NUMBER>
(toll free). For TTY, call<PHONE_NUMBER>.

    Dated: October 10, 2019.
Nathaniel J. Davis, Sr.,
Deputy Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2019-22663 Filed 10-16-19; 8:45 am]
 BILLING CODE 6717-01-P


Placeholder for document 141; this document is titled " Technical Document Describing EPA's Methodology for Identifying Available Stocks of Methyl Bromide" and contains Confidential Business Information.

Please contact Hodayah Finman at 202 343 9246 for more information.


[Federal Register: October 8, 2009 (Volume 74, Number 194)]
[Notices]
[Page 51848-51850]
[DOCID:fr08oc09-52]

=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY

[EPA-HQ-OW-2006-0369; FRL-8967-5]

Agency Information Collection Activities; Proposed Collection;
Comment Request; National Estuary Program (Renewal); EPA ICR No.
1500.07, OMB Control No. 2040-0138

AGENCY: Environmental Protection Agency (EPA).

ACTION: Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: In compliance with the Paperwork Reduction Act (PRA) (44
U.S.C. 3501 et seq.), this document announces that EPA is planning to
submit a request to renew an existing approved Information Collection
Request (ICR) to the Office of Management and Budget (OMB). This ICR is
scheduled to expire on 01/31/2010. Before submitting the ICR to OMB for
review and approval, EPA is soliciting comments on specific aspects of
the proposed information collection as described below.

DATES: Comments must be submitted on or before December 7, 2009.

ADDRESSES: Submit your comments, identified by Docket ID No. EPA-HQ-OW-
2006-0369 by one of the following methods:
     http://www.regulations.gov: Follow the on-line
instructions for submitting comments.
     E-mail<EMAIL_ADDRESS>     Fax:<PHONE_NUMBER>.
     Mail: EPA-HQ-OW-2006-0369, Environmental Protection
Agency, EPA Docket Center (EPA/DC), Water Docket--Mail Code 28221T,
1200 Pennsylvania Avenue, NW., Washington, DC 20460.
     Hand Delivery: Office of Water Docket, Environmental
Protection Agency, Public Reading Room, Room B102, 1301 Constitution
Ave., NW., Washington, DC 20004. Such deliveries are only accepted
during the Docket's normal hours of operation, and special arrangements
should be made for deliveries of boxed information.
    Instructions: Direct your comments to Docket ID No. EPA-HQ-OW-2006-
0369. EPA's policy is that all comments received will be included in
the public docket without change and may be made available online at
http://www.regulations.gov, including any personal information
provided, unless the comment includes information claimed to be
Confidential Business Information (CBI) or other information whose
disclosure is restricted by statute. Do not submit information that you
consider to be CBI or otherwise

protected through http://www.regulations.gov, or e-mail. The http://
www.regulations.gov Web site is an ``anonymous access'' system, which
means EPA will not know your identity or contact information unless you
provide it in the body of your comment. If you send an e-mail comment
directly to EPA without going through http://www.regulations.gov, your
e-mail address will be automatically captured and included as part of
the comment that is placed in the public docket and made available on
the Internet. If you submit an electronic comment, EPA recommends that
you include your name and other contact information in the body of your
comment and with any disk or CD-ROM you submit. If EPA cannot read your
comment due to technical difficulties and cannot contact you for
clarification, EPA may not be able to consider your comment. Electronic
files should avoid the use of special characters, any form of
encryption, and be free of any defects or viruses. For additional
information about EPA's public docket visit the EPA Docket Center
homepage at http://www.epa.gov/dockets.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Nell Orscheln, Oceans and Coastal
Protection Division, Office of Wetlands, Oceans, and Watersheds, Mail
Code 4504T, Environmental Protection Agency, 1200 Pennsylvania Ave.,
NW., Washington, DC 20460; telephone number:<PHONE_NUMBER>; fax
number:<PHONE_NUMBER>; e-mail address<EMAIL_ADDRESS>
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

How Can I Access the Docket and/or Submit Comments?

    EPA has established a public docket for this ICR under Docket ID
No. EPA-HQ-OW-2006-0369, which is available for online viewing at
http://www.regulations.gov, or in person viewing at the Water Docket in
the EPA Docket Center (EPA/DC), EPA West, Room 3334, 1301 Constitution
Ave., NW., Washington, DC. The EPA/DC Public Reading Room is open from
8 a.m. to 4:30 p.m., Monday through Friday, excluding legal holidays.
The telephone number for the Reading Room is<PHONE_NUMBER>, and the
telephone number for the Water Docket is<PHONE_NUMBER>.
    Use http://www.regulations.gov, to obtain a copy of the draft
collection of information, submit or view public comments, access the
index listing of the contents of the docket, and to access those
documents in the public docket that are available electronically. Once
in the system, select ``search,'' then key in the docket ID number
identified in this document.

What Information Is EPA Particularly Interested in?

    Pursuant to section 3506(c)(2)(A) of the PRA, EPA specifically
solicits comments and information to enable it to:
    (i) Evaluate whether the proposed collection of information is
necessary for the proper performance of the functions of the Agency,
including whether the information will have practical utility;
    (ii) Evaluate the accuracy of the Agency's estimate of the burden
of the proposed collection of information, including the validity of
the methodology and assumptions used;
    (iii) Enhance the quality, utility, and clarity of the information
to be collected; and
    (iv) Minimize the burden of the collection of information on those
who are to respond, including through the use of appropriate automated
electronic, mechanical, or other technological collection techniques or
other forms of information technology, e.g., permitting electronic
submission of responses. In particular, EPA is requesting comments from
very small businesses (those that employ less than 25 people) on
examples of specific additional efforts that EPA could make to reduce
the paperwork burden for very small businesses affected by this
collection.

What Should I Consider When I Prepare My Comments for EPA?

    You may find the following suggestions helpful for preparing your
comments:
    1. Explain your views as clearly as possible and provide specific
examples.
    2. Describe any assumptions that you used.
    3. Provide copies of any technical information and/or data you used
that support your views.
    4. If you estimate potential burden or costs, explain how you
arrived at the estimate that you provide.
    5. Offer alternative ways to improve the collection activity.
    6. Make sure to submit your comments by the deadline identified
under DATES.
    7. To ensure proper receipt by EPA, be sure to identify the docket
ID number assigned to this action in the subject line on the first page
of your response. You may also provide the name, date, and Federal
Register citation.

What Information Collection Activity or ICR Does This Apply to?

    Affected entities: Entities potentially affected by this action are
those state or local agencies or nongovernmental organizations in the
National Estuary Program (NEP) who receive grants under Section 320 of
the Clean Water Act.
    Title: National Estuary Program (Renewal).
    ICR Numbers: EPA ICR No. 1500.07, OMB Control No. 2040-0138.
    ICR Status: This ICR is currently scheduled to expire 01/31/2010.
An Agency may not conduct or sponsor, and a person is not required to
respond to, a collection of information, unless it displays a currently
valid OMB control number. The OMB control numbers for EPA's regulations
in title 40 of the CFR, after appearing in the Federal Register when
approved, are listed in 40 CFR part 9, are displayed either by
publication in the Federal Register or by other appropriate means, such
as on the related collection instrument or form, if applicable. The
display of OMB control numbers in certain EPA regulations is
consolidated in 40 CFR part 9.
    Abstract:
    Annual Workplans: The NEP involves collecting information from the
state or local agency or nongovernmental organizations that receive
funds under Sec.  320 of the Clean Water Act. The regulation requiring
this information is found at 40 CFR Part 35. Prospective grant
recipients seek funding to develop or oversee and coordinate
implementation of Comprehensive Conservation Management Plans (CCMPs)
for estuaries of national significance. In order to receive funds,
grantees must submit an annual workplan to EPA. The workplan consists
of two parts: (a) Progress on projects funded previously; and (b) new
projects proposed with dollar amounts and completion dates. The
workplan is reviewed by EPA and also serves as the scope of work for
the grant agreement. EPA also uses these workplans to track performance
of each of the 28 estuary programs currently in the NEP.
    Program Evaluations: EPA provides funding to NEPs to support long-
term implementation of CCMPs if such programs pass a program evaluation
process. The primary purpose of the program evaluation process is to
help EPA determine whether the 28 programs included in the National
Estuary Program (NEP) are making adequate progress implementing their
CCMPs and therefore merit continued funding under Sec.  320 of the
Clean Water Act. Continued funding for each NEP under Sec.  320 of the
CWA is contingent upon Congress appropriating sufficient funds to the
EPA for the purpose of implementing the NEP. The program evaluation
process also is useful for highlighting

environmental results; highlighting strengths and challenges in program
management; demonstrating continued stakeholder commitment; assessing
the progress of the NEP as a national program; and transferring lessons
learned within EPA, among NEPs, and with other watershed programs. For
this ICR cycle, program evaluations will be required for nine programs
in FY2010, nine programs in FY2011, and ten programs in 2012.
    Government Performance Results Act: EPA requests that each of the
28 NEPs receiving Sec.  320 funds report information that can be used
in the GPRA reporting process. This reporting is done on an annual
basis and is used to show environmental results that are being achieved
within the overall NEP Program. This information is ultimately
submitted to Congress along with GPRA information from other EPA
programs.
    Burden Statement: The annual public reporting and recordkeeping
burden for this collection of information is estimated to average 218
hours per response. Burden means the total time, effort, or financial
resources expended by persons to generate, maintain, retain, or
disclose or provide information to or for a Federal agency. This
includes the time needed to review instructions; develop, acquire,
install, and utilize technology and systems for the purposes of
collecting, validating, and verifying information, processing and
maintaining information, and disclosing and providing information;
adjust the existing ways to comply with any previously applicable
instructions and requirements which have subsequently changed; train
personnel to be able to respond to a collection of information; search
data sources; complete and review the collection of information; and
transmit or otherwise disclose the information.
    The ICR provides a detailed explanation of the Agency's estimate,
which is only briefly summarized here:
    Estimated total number of potential respondents: 28.
    Frequency of response: Annual.
    Estimated total average number of responses for each respondent:
2.3.
    Estimated total annual burden hours: 5,833.
    Estimated total annual costs: $409,349, includes $0 annualized
capital or O&M costs.

Are There Changes in the Estimates from the Last Approval?

    There are no changes in burden from the last approval.

What is the Next Step in the Process for this ICR?

    EPA will consider the comments received and amend the ICR as
appropriate. The final ICR package will then be submitted to OMB for
review and approval pursuant to 5 CFR 1320.12. At that time, EPA will
issue another Federal Register notice pursuant to 5 CFR
1320.5(a)(1)(iv) to announce the submission of the ICR to OMB and the
opportunity to submit additional comments to OMB. If you have any
questions about this ICR or the approval process, please contact the
technical person listed under FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT.

    Dated: October 1, 2009.
Suzanne Schwartz,
Director, Office of Wetlands, Oceans, and Watersheds.
[FR Doc. E9-24341 Filed 10-7-09; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 6560-50-P


[Federal Register: February 5, 2008 (Volume 73, Number 24)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Page 6596-6597]
[DOCID:fr05fe08-10]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION

Federal Aviation Administration

14 CFR Part 39

[Docket No. FAA-2007-0349 Directorate Identifier 2007-CE-094-AD;
Amendment 39-15366; AD 2008-03-15]
RIN 2120-AA64

Airworthiness Directives; EADS SOCATA Model TBM 700 Airplanes

AGENCY: Federal Aviation Administration (FAA), Department of
Transportation (DOT).

ACTION: Final rule.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: We are superseding an existing airworthiness directive (AD)
for the products listed above. This AD results from mandatory
continuing airworthiness information (MCAI) issued by an aviation
authority of another country to identify and correct an unsafe
condition on an aviation product. The MCAI describes the unsafe
condition as:

    A non-respect of the pilot door adjustment procedure could have
damaged the stop fitting and could result in a consequent
depressurization of the airplane.

    We are issuing this AD to require actions to correct the unsafe
condition on these products.

DATES: This AD becomes effective March 11, 2008.
    On March 11, 2008, the Director of the Federal Register approved
the incorporation by reference of EADS SOCATA TBM Aircraft Mandatory
Service Bulletin SB 70-131, Amendment 1, dated June 2007, listed in
this AD.
    As of March 23, 2007 (72 FR 7559, February 16, 2007), the Director
of the Federal Register approved the incorporation by reference of EADS
SOCATA TBM Aircraft Mandatory Service Bulletin SB 70-131, dated July
2005, listed in this AD.

ADDRESSES: You may examine the AD docket on the Internet at http://www.regulations.gov
 or in person at Document Management Facility, U.S.

Department of Transportation, Docket Operations, M-30, West Building
Ground Floor, Room W12-140, 1200 New Jersey Avenue, SE., Washington, DC
20590.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Albert J. Mercado, Aerospace Engineer,
FAA, Small Airplane Directorate, 901 Locust, Room 301, Kansas City,
Missouri, 64106; telephone:<PHONE_NUMBER>; facsimile:<PHONE_NUMBER>.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

Discussion

    We issued a notice of proposed rulemaking (NPRM) to amend 14 CFR
part 39 to include an AD that would apply to the specified products.
That NPRM was published in the Federal Register on December 17, 2007
(72 FR 71279) and proposed to supersede AD 2007-04-08, Amendment 39-
14939 (72 FR 7559, February 16, 2007). That NPRM proposed to correct an
unsafe condition for the specified products. The MCAI states:

    A non-respect of the pilot door adjustment procedure could have
damaged the stop fitting and could result in a consequent
depressurization of the airplane.

    This AD requires you to inspect the pilot door locking stop
fittings for correct length and replace any incorrect length pilot door
locking stop fittings found.
    You may obtain further information by examining the MCAI in the AD
docket.

Comments

    We gave the public the opportunity to participate in developing
this AD. We received no comments on the NPRM or on the determination of
the cost to the public.

Conclusion

    We reviewed the available data and determined that air safety and
the public interest require adopting the AD as proposed.

Differences Between This AD and the MCAI or Service Information

    We have reviewed the MCAI and related service information and, in
general, agree with their substance. But we might have found it
necessary to use different words from those in the MCAI to ensure the
AD is clear for U.S. operators and is enforceable. In making these
changes, we do not intend to differ substantively from the information
provided in the MCAI and related service information.
    We might also have required different actions in this AD from those
in the MCAI in order to follow FAA policies. Any such differences are
highlighted in a NOTE within the AD.

Costs of Compliance

    Based on the service information, we estimate that this AD will
affect about 157 products of U.S. registry. We also estimate that it
will take about 4.5 work-hours per product to comply with the basic
requirements of this AD. The average labor rate is $80 per work-hour.
Required parts will cost about $15 per product.
    Based on these figures, we estimate the cost of the AD on U.S.
operators to be $58,875, or $375 per product.

Authority for This Rulemaking

    Title 49 of the United States Code specifies the FAA's authority to
issue rules on aviation safety. Subtitle I, section 106, describes the
authority of the FAA Administrator. ``Subtitle VII: Aviation
Programs,'' describes in more detail the scope of the Agency's
authority.
    We are issuing this rulemaking under the authority described in
``Subtitle VII, Part A, Subpart III, Section 44701: General
requirements.'' Under that section, Congress charges the FAA with
promoting safe flight of civil aircraft in air commerce by prescribing
regulations for practices, methods, and procedures the Administrator
finds necessary for safety in air commerce. This regulation is within
the scope of that authority because it addresses an unsafe condition
that is likely to exist or develop on products identified in this
rulemaking action.

Regulatory Findings

    We determined that this AD will not have federalism implications
under Executive Order 13132. This AD will not have a substantial direct
effect on the States, on the relationship between the national
government and the States, or on the distribution of power and
responsibilities among the various levels of government.
    For the reasons discussed above, I certify this AD:
    (1) Is not a ``significant regulatory action'' under Executive
Order 12866;
    (2) Is not a ``significant rule'' under DOT Regulatory Policies and
Procedures (44 FR 11034, February 26, 1979); and
    (3) Will not have a significant economic impact, positive or
negative, on a substantial number of small entities under the criteria
of the Regulatory Flexibility Act.
    We prepared a regulatory evaluation of the estimated costs to
comply with this AD and placed it in the AD Docket.

Examining the AD Docket

    You may examine the AD docket on the Internet at http://www.regulations.gov
; or in person at the Docket Management Facility

between 9 a.m. and 5 p.m., Monday through Friday, except Federal
holidays. The AD docket contains the NPRM, the regulatory evaluation,
any comments received, and other information. The street address for
the Docket Office (telephone<PHONE_NUMBER>) is in the ADDRESSES
section. Comments will be

available in the AD docket shortly after receipt.

List of Subjects in 14 CFR Part 39

    Air transportation, Aircraft, Aviation safety, Incorporation by
reference, Safety.

Adoption of the Amendment

0
Accordingly, under the authority delegated to me by the Administrator,
the FAA amends 14 CFR part 39 as follows:

PART 39--AIRWORTHINESS DIRECTIVES

0
1. The authority citation for part 39 continues to read as follows:

    Authority: 49 U.S.C. 106(g), 40113, 44701.

Sec.  39.13  [Amended]

0
2. The FAA amends Sec.  39.13 by removing Amendment 39-14939 (72 FR
7559, February 16, 2007), and adding the following new AD:

2008-03-15 EADS SOCATA: Amendment 39-15366; Docket No. FAA-2007-
0349; Directorate Identifier 2007-CE-094-AD.

Effective Date

    (a) This airworthiness directive (AD) becomes effective March
11, 2008.

Affected ADs

    (b) This AD supersedes AD 2007-04-08, Amendment 39-14939.

Applicability

    (c) This AD applies to Model TBM 700 airplanes, serial numbers
126 through 322, that are:
    (1) Equipped with a pilot door; and
    (2) Certificated in any category.

Subject

    (d) Air Transport Association of America (ATA) Code 53:
Fuselage.

Reason

    (e) The mandatory continuing airworthiness information (MCAI)
states:

    A non-respect of the pilot door adjustment procedure could have
damaged the stop fitting and could result in a consequent
depressurization of the airplane.

This AD requires you to inspect the pilot door locking stop fittings
for correct length and replace any incorrect length pilot door
locking stop fittings found.

Requirements Retained From AD 2007-04-08

    (f) Unless already done, inspect the pilot door locking stop-
fittings for correct length within 30 days after March 23, 2007 (the
effective date of AD 2007-04-08). Do the inspection following EADS
SOCATA TBM Aircraft Mandatory Service Bulletin SB 70-131, dated July
2005 or EADS SOCATA TBM Aircraft Mandatory Service Bulletin SB 70-
131, Amendment 1, dated June 2007.

New Requirements of This AD: Actions and Compliance

    (g) Do the following actions, unless already done:
    (1) Any incorrect length pilot door locking stop-fittings
replaced following the inspection required in paragraph (f) of this
AD in accordance with AD 2007-04-08, using the original issue of
EADS SOCATA TBM Aircraft Mandatory Service Bulletin SB 70-131, dated
July 2005, must be replaced again within the next 12 months after
March 11, 2008 (the effective date of this AD). Do the replacement
using EADS SOCATA TBM Aircraft Mandatory Service Bulletin SB 70-131,
Amendment 1, dated June 2007.
    (2) Any incorrect length pilot door locking stop-fittings found
during the inspection required in paragraph (f) of this AD and not
previously replaced in accordance with AD 2007-04-08, must be
replaced before further flight after March 11, 2008 (the effective
date this AD). Do the replacement using EADS SOCATA TBM Aircraft
Mandatory Service Bulletin SB 70-131, Amendment 1, dated June 2007.

FAA AD Differences

    Note: This AD differs from the MCAI and/or service information
as follows: No differences.

Other FAA AD Provisions

    (h) The following provisions also apply to this AD:
    (1) Alternative Methods of Compliance (AMOCs): The Manager,
Standards Office, FAA, has the authority to approve AMOCs for this
AD, if requested using the procedures found in 14 CFR 39.19. Send
information to ATTN: Albert Mercado, Aerospace Engineer, FAA, Small
Airplane Directorate, 901 Locust, Room 301, Kansas City, Missouri
64106; telephone:<PHONE_NUMBER>; fax:<PHONE_NUMBER>. Before using
any approved AMOC on any airplane to which the AMOC applies, notify
your appropriate principal inspector (PI) in the FAA Flight
Standards District Office (FSDO), or lacking a PI, your local FSDO.
    (2) Airworthy Product: For any requirement in this AD to obtain
corrective actions from a manufacturer or other source, use these
actions if they are FAA-approved. Corrective actions are considered
FAA-approved if they are approved by the State of Design Authority
(or their delegated agent). You are required to assure the product
is airworthy before it is returned to service.
    (3) Reporting Requirements: For any reporting requirement in
this AD, under the provisions of the Paperwork Reduction Act (44
U.S.C. 3501 et seq.), the Office of Management and Budget (OMB) has
approved the information collection requirements and has assigned
OMB Control Number 2120-0056.

Special Flight Permit

    (i) If you have ordered parts and they are not available, then
you may fly unpressurized until parts become available or for a
period not to exceed 90 days after the inspection required in
paragraph (f) of this AD, whichever occurs first. You must also
fabricate and install a placard as described below. Completing the
action of paragraph (g)(2) of this AD terminates the placard
requirement.
    (1) Fabricate (using letters at least \1/8\ inch in height) a
warning placard that states ``This airplane is prohibited from
pressurized flight.''
    (2) Install the placard in full view of the pilot. The owner/
operator holding at least a private pilot certificate as authorized
by section 43.7 of the Federal Aviation Regulations (14 CFR 43.7)
may install the placard as required in paragraph (h) of this AD.

Related Information

    (j) Refer to MCAI Direction g[eacute]n[eacute]rale de l'aviation
civile (DGAC) AD No. F-2007-016, October 10, 2007; and EADS SOCATA
TBM Aircraft Mandatory Service Bulletin SB 70-131, Amendment 1,
dated June 2007, for related information.

Material Incorporated by Reference

    (k) You must use EADS SOCATA TBM Aircraft Mandatory Service
Bulletin SB 70-131, dated July 2005, or EADS SOCATA TBM Aircraft
Mandatory Service Bulletin SB 70-131, Amendment 1, dated June 2007,
to do the actions required by this AD, unless the AD specifies
otherwise.
    (1) The Director of the Federal Register approved the
incorporation by reference of EADS SOCATA TBM Aircraft Mandatory
Service Bulletin SB 70-131, Amendment 1, dated June 2007, under 5
U.S.C. 552(a) and 1 CFR part 51.
    (2) On March 23, 2007 (72 FR 7559, February 16, 2007), the
Director of the Federal Register previously approved the
incorporation by reference of EADS SOCATA TBM Aircraft Mandatory
Service Bulletin SB 70-131, dated July 2005.
    (3) For service information identified in this AD, contact EADS
SOCATA, Direction des Services, 65921 Tarbes Cedex 9, France;
telephone: 33 (0)5 62 41 73 00; fax: 33 (0)5 62 41 76 54; or SOCATA
Aircraft, Inc., North Perry Airport, 7501 South Airport Rd.,
Pembroke Pines, FL 33023; telephone:<PHONE_NUMBER>; fax: (954) 964-
4141.
    (4) You may review copies at the FAA, Central Region, Office of
the Regional Counsel, 901 Locust, Room 506, Kansas City, Missouri
64106; or at the National Archives and Records Administration
(NARA). For information on the availability of this material at
NARA, call<PHONE_NUMBER>, or go to: http://www.archives.gov/federal-register/cfr/ibr-locations.html
.

    Issued in Kansas City, Missouri, on January 29, 2008.
John Colomy,
Acting Manager, Small Airplane Directorate, Aircraft Certification
Service.
[FR Doc. E8-2026 Filed 2-4-08; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4910-13-P


                                                                      9110-04-P
DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY
Coast Guard
33 CFR Part 165
[Docket Number USCG-2022-0212]
RIN 1625-AA00
Safety Zone; Anacostia River, Washington, D.C.
AGENCY:  Coast Guard, DHS.
ACTION:  Temporary final rule.
________________________________________________________________________
SUMMARY:  The Coast Guard is establishing a temporary safety zone for certain waters of the Anacostia River. The safety zone is needed to protect personnel, vessels, and the marine environment on these navigable waters near Washington, D.C. on April 16, 2022 (rain date April 17, 2022) from potential hazards during a fireworks display occurring as a part of the National Cherry Blossom Festival. Entry of vessels or persons into this zone is prohibited unless specifically authorized by the Captain of the Port, Maryland-National Capital Region or a designated representative.
DATES: This rule is effective from 7:30 p.m. on April 16, 2022, through 9:30 p.m. on April 17, 2022.  This rule will be enforced from 7:30 p.m. through 9:30 p.m. on April 16, 2022, or those same hours on April 17, 2022, in the case of inclement weather on April 16, 2022.
ADDRESSES:  To view documents mentioned in this preamble as being available in the docket, go to https://www.regulations.gov, type USCG-2022-0212 in the "SEARCH" box and click "SEARCH."   Next, in the Document Type column, select "Supporting & Related Material."
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:  If you have questions about this rule, call or email MST3 Melissa Kelly, Sector Maryland-National Capital Region Waterways Management Division, U.S. Coast Guard; telephone<PHONE_NUMBER>, email<EMAIL_ADDRESS>SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
I.  Table of Abbreviations

CFR		Code of Federal Regulations
COTP		Captain of the Port
DHS		Department of Homeland Security
FR		Federal Register
NPRM		Notice of proposed rulemaking
§		Section
U.S.C.		United States Code

II.  Background Information and Regulatory History
      The Coast Guard is issuing this temporary rule without prior notice and opportunity to comment pursuant to authority under section 4(a) of the Administrative Procedure Act (APA) (5 U.S.C. 553(b)).  This provision authorizes an agency to issue a rule without prior notice and opportunity to comment when the agency for good cause finds that those procedures are "impracticable, unnecessary, or contrary to the public interest."  Under 5 U.S.C. 553(b)(B), the Coast Guard finds that good cause exists for not publishing a notice of proposed rulemaking (NPRM) with respect to this rule because it is impracticable and contrary to the public interest to do so.  We must establish this safety zone by April 16, 2022, to protect the public from hazards associated with the fireworks event.  Hazards include explosive materials, dangerous projectiles, and falling debris.  The fireworks fall out zone extends across the navigable channel.
      Under 5 U.S.C. 553(d)(3), the Coast Guard finds that good cause exists for making this rule effective less than 30 days after publication in the Federal Register.  Delaying the effective date of this rule would be impracticable and contrary to the public interest because immediate action is needed to respond to the potential safety hazards associated with the fireworks display.
III.  Legal Authority and Need for Rule
      The Coast Guard is issuing this rule under authority in 46 U.S.C. 70034 (previously 33 U.S.C. 1231).  The Captain of the Port, Maryland-National Capital Region (COTP) has determined that potential hazards associated with the fireworks to be used in the April 16, 2022 display will be a safety concern for anyone near the fireworks barge.  This rule is needed to protect personnel, vessels, and the marine environment in the navigable waters within the safety zone before, during, and after the scheduled event.
IV.  Discussion of the Rule
      This rule establishes a temporary safety zone from 7:30 p.m. on April 16, 2022, through 9:30 p.m. on April 17, 2022.  The rule will be enforced from 7:30 p.m. through 9:30 p.m. on April 16, 2022, or in the event of inclement weather on April 16, those same hours on April 17, 2022.  The safety zone covers all navigable waters of the Anacostia River within 500 feet of the fireworks barge in approximate position latitude 38º 52' 15.39" N, longitude 77º 00' 09.39" W, located near Nationals Park in Washington, D.C.  The size of the zone and duration of the rule are intended to protect personnel, vessels, and the marine environment in these navigable waters before, during, and after the scheduled fireworks display.  No vessel or person will be permitted to enter the safety zone without obtaining permission from the COTP or a designated representative.
V.  Regulatory Analyses
      We developed this rule after considering numerous statutes and Executive orders related to rulemaking.  Below we summarize our analyses based on a number of these statutes and Executive orders, and we discuss First Amendment rights of protestors.
      A.  Regulatory Planning and Review
      Executive Orders 12866 and 13563 direct agencies to assess the costs and benefits of available regulatory alternatives and, if regulation is necessary, to select regulatory approaches that maximize net benefits.  This rule has not been designated a "significant regulatory action" under Executive Order 12866.  Accordingly, this rule has not been reviewed by the Office of Management and Budget (OMB).
      This regulatory action determination is based on the size, duration, and time-of-day of the safety zone, which will impact a small designated area of the Anacostia River for no more than 4 enforcement-hours during evening hours when vessel traffic is normally low. Moreover, the Coast Guard will issue a Broadcast Notice to Mariners via VHF-FM marine channel 16 about the zone.
       B.  Impact on Small Entities
      The Regulatory Flexibility Act of 1980, 5 U.S.C. 601 - 612, as amended, requires Federal agencies to consider the potential impact of regulations on small entities during rulemaking.  The term "small entities" comprises small businesses, not-for-profit organizations that are independently owned and operated and are not dominant in their fields, and governmental jurisdictions with populations of less than 50,000.  The Coast Guard certifies under 5 U.S.C. 605(b) that this rule will not have a significant economic impact on a substantial number of small entities.
      While some owners or operators of vessels intending to transit the safety zone may be small entities, for the reasons stated in section V.A above, this rule will not have a significant economic impact on any vessel owner or operator.
      Under section 213(a) of the Small Business Regulatory Enforcement Fairness Act of 1996 (Public Law 104-121), we want to assist small entities in understanding this rule.  If the rule would affect your small business, organization, or governmental jurisdiction and you have questions concerning its provisions or options for compliance, please call or email the person listed in the FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT section.
      Small businesses may send comments on the actions of Federal employees who enforce, or otherwise determine compliance with, Federal regulations to the Small Business and Agriculture Regulatory Enforcement Ombudsman and the Regional Small Business Regulatory Fairness Boards.  The Ombudsman evaluates these actions annually and rates each agency's responsiveness to small business.  If you wish to comment on actions by employees of the Coast Guard, call 1-888-REG-FAIR (1-888-734-3247).  The Coast Guard will not retaliate against small entities that question or complain about this rule or any policy or action of the Coast Guard.
      C.  Collection of Information
      This rule will not call for a new collection of information under the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 (44 U.S.C. 3501 - 3520).
      D.  Federalism and Indian Tribal Governments
      A rule has implications for federalism under Executive Order 13132, Federalism, if it has a substantial direct effect on the States, on the relationship between the National Government and the States, or on the distribution of power and responsibilities among the various levels of government.  We have analyzed this rule under that Order and have determined that it is consistent with the fundamental federalism principles and preemption requirements described in Executive Order 13132.
      Also, this rule does not have tribal implications under Executive Order 13175, Consultation and Coordination with Indian Tribal Governments, because it does not have a substantial direct effect on one or more Indian tribes, on the relationship between the Federal Government and Indian tribes, or on the distribution of power and responsibilities between the Federal Government and Indian tribes.
      E.  Unfunded Mandates Reform Act
      The Unfunded Mandates Reform Act of 1995 (2 U.S.C. 1531 - 1538) requires Federal agencies to assess the effects of their discretionary regulatory actions.  In particular, the Act addresses actions that may result in the expenditure by a State, local, or tribal government, in the aggregate, or by the private sector of $100,000,000 (adjusted for inflation) or more in any one year.  Though this rule will not result in such an expenditure, we do discuss the effects of this rule elsewhere in this preamble.
      F.  Environment
      We have analyzed this rule under Department of Homeland Security Directive 023-01, Rev. 1, associated implementing instructions, and Environmental Planning COMDTINST 5090.1 (series), which guide the Coast Guard in complying with the National Environmental Policy Act of 1969 (42 U.S.C. 4321 - 4370f), and have determined that this action is one of a category of actions that do not individually or cumulatively have a significant effect on the human environment.  This rule involves a safety zone that will be enforced for 3 hours that will prohibit entry within a portion of the Anacostia River. It is categorically excluded from further review under paragraph L60(a) of Appendix A, Table 1 of DHS Instruction Manual 023 - 01 - 001 - 01, Rev. 1.  A Record of Environmental Consideration supporting this determination is available in the docket.  For instructions on locating the docket, see the ADDRESSES section of this preamble.
      G.  Protest Activities
      The Coast Guard respects the First Amendment rights of protesters.  Protesters are asked to call or email the person listed in the FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT section to coordinate protest activities so that your message can be received without jeopardizing the safety or security of people, places or vessels.
List of Subjects in 33 CFR Part 165
      Harbors, Marine safety, Navigation (water), Reporting and recordkeeping requirements, Security measures, Waterways.
      For the reasons discussed in the preamble, the Coast Guard amends 33 CFR part 165 as follows:
PART 165--REGULATED NAVIGATION AREAS AND LIMITED ACCESS AREAS
      1.  The authority citation for part 165 continues to read as follows:
      Authority:  46 U.S.C. 70034, 70051; 33 CFR 1.05-1, 6.04-1, 6.04-6, and 160.5; Department of Homeland Security Delegation No. 00170.1, Revision No. 01.2.
      2.  Add § 165.T05-0212 to read as follows:
§ 165.T05-0212  Safety Zone; Anacostia River, Washington, D.C.
      (a)  Location.  The following area is a safety zone:  All navigable waters of the Anacostia River within 500 feet of the fireworks barge in approximate position latitude 38º 52' 15.39" N, longitude 77º 00' 09.39" W located near Nationals Park, in Washington, DC.  These coordinates are based on datum NAD 83.
      (b)  Definitions.  As used in this section---
      Captain of the Port (COTP) means the Commander, U.S. Coast Guard Sector Maryland-National Capital Region.
      Designated representative means any Coast Guard commissioned, warrant, or petty officer who has been authorized by the Captain of the Port Maryland-National Capital Region to assist in enforcing the safety zone described in paragraph (a) of this section.
      (c)  Regulations.  (1)  Under the general safety zone regulations in subpart C of this part, you may not enter the safety zone described in paragraph (a) of this section unless authorized by the COTP or the COTP's designated representative.
      (2)  To seek permission to enter, contact the COTP or the COTP's representative by telephone at<PHONE_NUMBER> or on Marine Band Radio VHF-FM channel 16 (156.8 MHz).  The Coast Guard vessels enforcing this section can be contacted on Marine Band Radio VHF-FM channel 16 (156.8 MHz).  Those in the safety zone must comply with all lawful orders or directions given to them by the COTP or the COTP's designated representative.

      (d)  Enforcement officials.  The U.S. Coast Guard may be assisted in the patrol and enforcement of the safety zone by Federal, State, and local agencies.
      (e)  Enforcement period.  This section will be enforced from 7:30 p.m. to 9:30 p.m. on April 16, 2022, or in the event of inclement weather, from 7:30 p.m. through 9:30 p.m. on April 17, 2022.

Dated:  April 1, 2022.

David E. O'Connell,
Captain, U.S. Coast Guard,
Captain of the Port Maryland-National Capital Region.


 1 MEMORANDUM DATE: 13 DECEMBER 2005 SUBJECT: TERBACIL  AMENDMENT To: " Exposure/ Risk Assessment for the Proposed Use of Terbacil on Watermelon"; DP 313912.

PC Code: 012701 DP Code: 313756 FROM: Mark I. Dow, Ph. D., Biologist Registration Action Branch 1 ( RAB1) Health Effects Division 7509C ( HED)

THROUGH: P. V. Shah, Ph. D., Branch Senior Scientist RAB1/ HED 7509C TO: Daniel Rosenblatt, Chief Minor Use & Emergency Response Branch Registration Division, 7505C INTRODUCTION Under Section 3 of the Federal Insecticide, Fungicide and Rodenticide Act, as amended, the InterRegional Research Project No. 4 ( IR 4) and the E. I. du Pont de Nemours and Company, Crop Protection, have requested registration of the herbicide Terbacil ( 3 tert butyl 5 chloro 6 methyluracil) for use on watermelon to control broadleaf weeds and grasses. This memorandum serves as an amendment to the assessment of 11 March 2005, DP 313912. Subsequent to the original assessment, the RAB1 toxicological team has re evaluated the toxicological database relative to terbacil. An inhalation toxicological endpoint has been identified by the team and this amendment includes consideration of the inhalation endpoint.

USE PATTERN SUMMARY The proposed product is DuPontTM Sinbar ® herbicide which is an 80 % by weight active ingredient wettable powder ( EPA Reg. No. 352  317). According to the IR 4 submission it is  2 to be applied to control weeds and grasses in watermelon production. IR 4 says " Make up to one broadcast application at the rate of 0.15 lb active ingredient ( ai)/ Acre ( A) at the latest after planting but pre emergence." Applications are to be uniform in a minimum of 20 to 40 gallons of water per acre. There is a 70 day preharvest interval. The duPont supplemental label says terbacil can be applied at 0.1  0.15 lb a. i. per acre and that there is a maximum of 0.15 lb a. i./ A/ year.

Other registered uses of terbacil may be applied aerially. The supplemental label for watermelon states: " A maximum of one preemergence ground application of SINBAR ® may be applied at a rate of 0.1  0.15 pound active ingredient per acre.

The Sinbar ® label directs applicators and other handlers to wear long sleeved shirt, long pants, chemical resistant gloves ( such as butyl, natural, neoprene or nitrile rubber) $ 14 mils and shoes plus socks. See Table 1 for a summary of the proposed use pattern.

Table 1 Summary of Proposed Use of Terbacil on Watermelon Formulation 80 % wettable powder; EPA Reg. No. 352  317; Sinbar ® Herbicide Crop site watermelon Pest broad leaf weeds Application Rate 0.1  0.15 lb a. i./ A Application Maximum 0.15 lb a. i./ A/ year Application method ground boom spray Application number 1/ yr PreHarvest Interval 70 days Restricted Entry Interval 12 hours Manufacturer E. I. du Pont de Nemours and Company, Crop Protection OCCUPATIONAL PESTICIDE HANDLER EXPOSURE Based upon the proposed use pattern, HED believes occupational pesticide handlers ( i. e., mixers, loaders and applicators) will be exposed to short term ( 1  30 days) duration exposures. Treatment blocks ( number of acres) are relatively small compared to typical field crops such as cotton, corn, soybeans or wheat. Due to the methods of application, it is likely that handlers will be private, grower ( non commercial) handlers. The most highly exposed handlers are expected to be a mixer/ loader using open pour of wettable powders and an applicator using ground boom equipment.  3 Chemical specific data were not available with which to assess pesticide handler exposure. Therefore surrogate data from studies in the Pesticide Handler Exposure Database Version 1.1 ( August 1998) PHED SURROGATE EXPOSURE GUIDE were used to estimate mixer/ loader and applicator exposure.

It is HED policy to assess handler exposure and risk using " baseline" Personal Protective Equipment ( PPE) which is comprised of long sleeved shirt, long pants, and shoes plus socks and if necessary to assess " baseline" plus the use of protective gloves or other PPE as might be necessary or appropriate.

In some cases, HED recognizes that the same individual may perform all three tasks i. e., mix, load and apply a pesticide material. The available exposure data for combined mixer/ loader/ applicator scenarios are limited in comparison to the monitoring of these two activities separately. These exposure scenarios are outlined in the PHED Surrogate Exposure Guide ( August 1998). HED has adopted a methodology to present the exposure and risk estimates separately for the job functions in some scenarios and to present them as combined in other cases. Most exposure scenarios for hand held equipment ( such as hand wands, backpack sprayers, and push type granular spreaders) are assessed as a combined job function. With these types of hand held operations, all handling activities are assumed to be effected by the same individual. The available monitoring data support this and HED presents them in this way. Conversely, for equipment types such as fixed wing aircraft, groundboom tractors, or air blast sprayers, the applicator exposures are assessed and presented separately from those of the mixers and loaders. By separating the two job functions, HED determines the most appropriate levels of personal protective equipment ( PPE) for each aspect of the job without requiring the applicator to wear unnecessary PPE that may be required for a mixer/ loader ( e. g., chemical resistant gloves may only be necessary during the pouring of a liquid formulation).

The RAB1 toxicological team has re evaluated the toxicological database relative to terbacil and has identified inhalation toxicological endpoints. The short term duration ( 1  30 days) and intermediate term duration ( 1  6 months) inhalation exposures have a No Observable Adverse Effect Level ( NOAEL) of 2.0 mg a. i./ kg bw/ day. The effects seen were decreased maternal body weights and were identified from a 3 generation reproduction study in the rat. See the attachment for a summary of toxicological endpoints used for risk assessment purposes. Table 2.0 contains a summary of exposures and risks to occupational pesticide handlers.  4 Table 2 Estimated Handler Exposure and Risk from the Use of Terbacil on Watermelon Unit Exposure1 mg a. i./ lb handled Applic. Rate2 Units Treated3 Per Day Average Daily Dose4 mg a. i./ kg bw/ day MOE5 Mixer/ Loader  Wettable Powder  Open Pour Inhal 0.0434 HC 0.15 lb a. i./ A 200 A Inhal 0.019 108 Applicator  Ground boom  Open Cab Inhal 0.00074 HC 0.15 lb a. i./ A 200 A Inhal 0.00032 6,300 1. Unit Exposures are taken from " PHED SURROGATE EXPOSURE GUIDE", Estimates of Worker Exposure from The Pesticide Handler Exposure Database Version 1.1, August 1998. Inhal. = Inhalation. Units = mg a. i./ pound of active ingredient handled. Data Confidence: LC = Low Confidence, MC = Medium Confidence, HC = High Confidence. 2. Applic. Rate. = Taken from supplemental label and IR 4 submission.. 3. Units Treated are taken from " Standard Values for Daily Acres Treated in Agriculture"; SOP No. 9.1. Science Advisory Council for Exposure; Revised 5 July 2000; 4. Average Daily Dose = Unit Exposure * Applic. Rate * Units Treated ÷ Body Weight ( 70 kg). 5. MOE = Margin of Exposure = No Observable Adverse Effect Level ( NOAEL) ÷ ADD. Short term inhalation NOAEL = 2.0 mg a. i./ kg bw/ day and is identified from a 3 generation rat reproduction study. The effects seen were reduced maternal body weights.

A Margin of Exposure ( MOE) of 100 is adequate to protect occupational pesticide handlers. Since the MOE's are > 100, the proposed use does not exceed HED's level of concern.

POST APPLICATION EXPOSURE TO AGRICULTURAL WORKERS Typically, it is possible for agricultural workers to experience post application exposures to dislodgeable pesticide residues. In this case, there are no dermal toxicological endpoints identified. HED believes that post application inhalation exposures are negligible. There is a 12 hour restricted entry interval ( REI) for this product. It is expected that there is no volatility as the spray is essentially dry after 12 hours. The product is a wettable powder versus and liquid formulation thereby further reducing the possibility of significant inhalation exposure. The proposed use does not exceed HED's level of concern.  5 ATTACHMENT Exposure Scenario Dose Used in Risk Assessment, UF Special FQPA SF* and Level of Concern for Risk Assessment Study and Toxicological Effects Acute Dietary ( general population and Females 13+) An endpoint of concern attributable to a single dose for the general population and females 13+ was not identified Chronic Dietary ( All populations) NOAEL = 1.4 mg/ kg/ day UF = 100X Chronic RfD = 0.014 mg/ kg/ day FQPA SF = 1X cPAD = 0.014 mg/ kg/ day © RfD)/ 1X ( FQPA SF)

= 0.014 mg/ kg/ day Combined Chronic Toxicity/ Carcinogenicity rat; LOAEL = 83 mg/ kg/ day, based on decreased body weight and body weight gain in females.

Short Term Incidental Oral ( 1 30 days) NOAEL = 2.0 mg/ kg/ day Residential LOC for MOE = 100 Occupational LOC for MOE = 100 3 Gen Repro  rat; LOAEL = 10 mg/ kg/ day, based on decreased body weight Intermediate Term Incidental Oral ( 1 6 months)

Dermal ( Any Time Period) Quantification of dermal risk is not required. Exposure Scenario Dose Used in Risk Assessment, UF Special FQPA SF* and Level of Concern for Risk Assessment Study and Toxicological Effects  6 Short Term Inhalation ( 1 to 30 days) NOAEL = 2.0 mg/ kg/ day ( inhalation absorption rate = 100% oral equivalent) Residential LOC for MOE = 100 Occupational LOC for MOE = 100 3 Gen Repro  rat; LOAEL = 10 mg/ kg/ day, based on decreased body weight Intermediate Term Inhalation ( 1 to 6 months)

Long Term Inhalation (> 6 months) NOAEL = 1.4 mg/ kg/ day ( inhalation absorption rate = 100% oral equivalent) Residential LOC for MOE = 100; Occupational LOC for MOE = 100 Combined Chronic Toxicity/ Carcinogenicity rat; LOAEL = 83 mg/ kg/ day, based on decreased body weight and body weight gain in females.

Cancer Classification: Not likely to be carcinogenic to humans; cancer risk assessment is not required.

cc: M. Dow( RAB1) RDI: P. Shah, M. I. Dow: 806U: CM2:( 703) 305 5533: RAB1: 7509C


[Federal Register Volume 86, Number 196 (Thursday, October 14, 2021)]
[Notices]
[Pages 57171-57172]
[FR Doc No: 2021-22431]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY

Federal Emergency Management Agency

[Internal Agency Docket No. FEMA-4618-DR; Docket ID FEMA-2021-0001]

Pennsylvania; Amendment No. 1 to Notice of a Major Disaster
Declaration

AGENCY: Federal Emergency Management Agency, DHS.

ACTION: Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: This notice amends the notice of a major disaster declaration
for the Commonwealth of Pennsylvania (FEMA-4618-DR), dated September
10, 2021, and related determinations.

DATES: This amendment was issued September 24, 2021.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Dean Webster, Office of Response and
Recovery, Federal Emergency Management Agency, 500 C Street SW,
Washington, DC 20472,<PHONE_NUMBER>.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The notice of a major disaster declaration
for the Commonwealth of Pennsylvania is hereby amended to include the
following areas among those areas determined to have been adversely
affected by the event declared a major disaster by the President in his
declaration of September 10, 2021.

    Bedford and Northampton Counties for Individual Assistance.

    The following Catalog of Federal Domestic Assistance Numbers
(CFDA) are to be used

for reporting and drawing funds: 97.030, Community Disaster Loans;
97.031, Cora Brown Fund; 97.032, Crisis Counseling; 97.033, Disaster
Legal Services; 97.034, Disaster Unemployment Assistance (DUA);
97.046, Fire Management Assistance Grant; 97.048, Disaster Housing
Assistance to Individuals and Households In Presidentially Declared
Disaster Areas; 97.049, Presidentially Declared Disaster
Assistance--Disaster Housing Operations for Individuals and
Households; 97.050 Presidentially Declared Disaster Assistance to
Individuals and Households--Other Needs; 97.036, Disaster Grants--
Public Assistance (Presidentially Declared Disasters); 97.039,
Hazard Mitigation Grant.

Deanne Criswell,
Administrator, Federal Emergency Management Agency.
[FR Doc. 2021-22431 Filed 10-13-21; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 9111-23-P