[Federal Register Volume 78, Number 159 (Friday, August 16, 2013)]
[Proposed Rules]
[Pages 49992-49993]
[FR Doc No: 2013-19874]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY

40 CFR Part 52

[EPA-R09-OAR-2013-0394; FRL-9845-4]

Revisions to the California State Implementation Plan, Antelope
Valley Air Quality Management District and Ventura County Air Pollution
Control District

AGENCY: Environmental Protection Agency (EPA).

ACTION: Proposed rule.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: EPA is proposing to approve revisions to the Antelope Valley
Air Quality Management District (AVAQMD) and Ventura County Air
Pollution Control District (VCAPCD) portions of the California State
Implementation Plan (SIP). These revisions concern sulfur oxide
emissions from lead smelters and volatile organic compounds (VOC)
emissions from the data storage and vacuum producing device industries.
We are proposing to rescind local rules that regulate emission sources
under the Clean Air Act as amended in 1990 (CAA or the Act).

DATES: Any comments must arrive by September 16, 2013.

ADDRESSES: Submit comments, identified by docket number EPA-R09-OAR-
2013-0394 by one of the following methods:
    1. Federal eRulemaking Portal: www.regulations.gov. Follow the on-
line instructions.
    2. Email<EMAIL_ADDRESS>    3. Mail or deliver: Andrew Steckel (Air-4), U.S. Environmental
Protection Agency Region IX, 75 Hawthorne Street, San Francisco, CA
94105-3901.
    Instructions: All comments will be included in the public docket
without change and may be made available online at www.regulations.gov,
including any personal information provided, unless the comment
includes Confidential Business Information (CBI) or other information
whose disclosure is restricted by statute. Information that you
consider CBI or otherwise protected should be clearly identified as
such and should not be submitted through www.regulations.gov or email.
www.regulations.gov is an ``anonymous access'' system, and EPA will not
know your identity or contact information unless you provide it in the
body of your comment. If you send email directly to EPA, your email
address will be automatically captured and included as part of the
public comment. If EPA cannot read your comment due to technical
difficulties and cannot contact you for clarification, EPA may not be
able to consider your comment. Electronic files should avoid the use of
special characters, any form of encryption, and be free of any defects
or viruses.
    Docket: Generally, documents in the docket for this action are
available electronically at www.regulations.gov and in hard copy at EPA
Region IX, 75 Hawthorne Street, San Francisco, California. While all
documents in the docket are listed at www.regulations.gov, some
information may be publicly available only at the hard copy location
(e.g., copyrighted material, large maps), and some may not be publicly
available in either location (e.g., CBI). To inspect the hard copy
materials, please schedule an appointment during normal business hours
with the contact listed in the FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT section.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Robert Marinaro, EPA Region IX, (415)
972-3019<EMAIL_ADDRESS>
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: This proposal addresses the following local
rules: AVAQMD Rule 1101, ``Secondary Lead Smelters/Sulfur Oxides;''
VCAPCD Rule 37, ``Project XL;'' and VCAPCD Rule 67, ``Vacuum Producing
Devices.'' In the Rules and Regulations section of this Federal
Register, we are approving rescission of these local rules in a direct
final action without prior proposal because we believe these SIP
revisions are not controversial. If we receive adverse comments,
however, we will publish a timely withdrawal of the direct final rule
and address the comments in subsequent action based on this proposed
rule. Please note that if we receive adverse comments on an amendment,
paragraph, or section of this rule and if that provision may be severed
from the remainder of the rule, we may adopt as final those provisions
of the rule that are not the subject of an adverse comment.
    We do not plan to open a second comment period, so anyone
interested in commenting should do so at this time. If we do not
receive adverse comments, no further activity is planned. For further
information please see the direct final action.

    Dated: July 26, 2013.
Jared Blumenfeld,
Regional Administrator, Region IX.
[FR Doc. 2013-19874 Filed 8-15-13; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6560-50-P


[Federal Register: August 24, 2006 (Volume 71, Number 164)]
[Notices]
[Page 50056]
[DOCID:fr24au06-47]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission

[Docket No. CP06-429-000]

Florida Gas Transmission Company; Notice of Request Under Blanket
Authorization

August 17, 2006.
    Take notice that on August 8, 2006, Florida Gas Transmission
Company (FGT), 5444 Westheimer Road, Houston, Texas 77056, filed in
Docket No. CP06-429-000 a request pursuant to Sections 157.205 and
157.208 of the Commission's Regulations under the Natural Gas Act (18
CFR Sections 157.205 and 157.208) for authorization to replace
approximately 6.6 miles of existing St Petersburg 12-inch lateral gas
transmission lines located in east-central Pinellas County, Florida,
under the authorization issued in Docket No. CP82-553-000 pursuant to
Section 7 of the Natural Gas Act, all as more fully described in the
request.
    This filing is available for review at the Commission in the Public
Reference Room or may be viewed on the Commission's Web site at http://www.ferc.gov
 using the ``eLibrary'' link. Enter the docket number

excluding the last three digits in the docket number field to access
the document. For assistance, please contact FERC Online Support at
<EMAIL_ADDRESS>or toll-free at<PHONE_NUMBER>, or for TTY,

contact<PHONE_NUMBER>.
    Any questions concerning this request may be directed to Stephen
Veatch, Senior Director of Certificates & Tariffs, Florida Gas
Transmission Company, 5444 Westheimer Road, Houston, Texas 77056, at
(713) 989-2024 or Fax<PHONE_NUMBER> or by e-mail
<EMAIL_ADDRESS>
    FGT states that there are five (5) sections of the 12-inch St.
Petersburg lateral that need to be replaced. In addition to the 12-inch
pipeline to be replaced, FGT indicates that it intends to install a 12-
inch pig launcher and receiver, and replace block valves BV 24-10 and
24-11. FGT contends that the additional installations would allow for
passage of a pipeline integrity tool to be run after the segments are
replaced.
    FGT asserts that the proposed project is required to upgrade and
repair line sections and valves which have been in service for an
extended period of time. FGT maintains that the replaced pipe would be
filled with grout and abandoned in place. FGT concludes that the total
costs for the project is estimated to be $19,987,000.
    Any person or the Commission's Staff may, within 45 days after the
issuance of the instant notice by the Commission, file pursuant to Rule
214 of the Commission's Procedural Rules (18 CFR 385.214) a motion to
intervene or notice of intervention and, pursuant to Section 157.205 of
the Commission's Regulations under the Natural Gas Act (NGA) (18 CFR
157.205) a protest to the request. If no protest is filed within the
time allowed therefore, the proposed activity shall be deemed to be
authorized effective the day after the time allowed for protest. If a
protest is filed and not withdrawn within 30 days after the time
allowed for filing a protest, the instant request shall be treated as
an application for authorization pursuant to Section 7 of the NGA.
    Comments, protests and interventions may be filed electronically
via the Internet in lieu of paper. See, 18 CFR 385.2001(a)(1)(iii) and
the instructions on the Commission's Web site under the ``e-filing''
link. The Commission strongly encourages electronic filings.

Magalie R. Salas,
Secretary.
 [FR Doc. E6-14010 Filed 8-23-06; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 6717-01-P


United States Office of Water EPA 821 F 04 014 Environmental Protection ( 4303T) November 2004 Agency Fact Sheet Guidelines Establishing Test Procedures for the Analysis of Pollutants; Procedures for Detection and Quantitation; Notice of Document Availability and Proposed Rule Withdrawal Summary EPA is withdrawing its March 2003 proposal to revise detection and quantitation procedures used in CWA programs. EPA's decision to withdraw the proposal is based on the divergent views on the proposed revisions and a desire to improve the procedures through a possible stakeholder dialogue. EPA is also releasing a revised assessment document on detection and quantitation procedures.

What is the EPA doing today?

The EPA is withdrawing its March 2003 proposal to revise detection and quantitation procedures used in Clean Water Act ( CWA) programs. EPA is also releasing a revised assessment document entitled, " Revised Assessment of Detection and Quantitation Approaches." This revised assessment incorporates public comment on the February 2003 draft assessment document. These actions complete the terms of a settlement agreement with industry Petitioners.

What is detection and quantitation?

Detection indicates the presence of a pollutant in a sample. Quantitation indicates how much pollutant is in the sample. Detection and quantitation procedures apply to all chemical analytical methods under the Clean Water Act. The procedures are a way to calibrate, or pretest laboratory instruments to confirm that they accurately measure a specific chemical pollutant in a water sample. The procedures allow the lab to determine how well the instrument detects ( the presence of a pollutant) and quantifies ( the amount of that pollutant) a chemical in a water sample.

Why is EPA withdrawing the proposed rule?

EPA's decision to withdraw the proposed rule is based on public comments on the proposed changes. Comments represented many divergent views and conflicting suggestions on the proposed revisions to detection and quantitation procedures. Commenters also included new procedures for EPA to consider. Rather than making changes to the existing Agency procedures, EPA will get better results if it continues the dialogue with individual stakeholders to resolve the many complex technical and policy issues that were raised in public comment.

What is EPA doing to continue the dialogue with Stakeholders?

In a Federal Register Notice published on September 15, 2004 [ 69 FR 55547], EPA announced the beginning of the design of a process for dialogue. A neutral party is interviewing stakeholders to assess the feasibility of a process to bring a broad group of stakeholders together to define and address concerns about the way detection and quantitation values are calculated and used to support CWA programs. The Agency will publish the results of this feasibility assessment at www. epa. gov/ waterscience/ methods.

Additional Information and Copies You can get more information by contacting William Telliard at the EPA Office of Water, Engineering and Analysis Division ( 4303T), 1200 Pennsylvania Avenue, NW Washington, D. C. 20460; ( Email: Telliard. William@ epa. gov)

You can view and download the complete text of the Federal Register notices by visiting the Internet at / www. epa. gov/ waterscience/ methods. You can also get copies of the notice and other documents by calling the Water Resource Center at 202 566 1729.


[Federal Register Volume 83, Number 178 (Thursday, September 13, 2018)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Pages 46389-46390]
[FR Doc No: 2018-19713]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION

Federal Aviation Administration

14 CFR Part 71

[Docket No. FAA-2018-0018; Airspace Docket No. 17-AGL-20]
RIN 2120-AA66

Establishment of Class E Airspace; Washington Island, WI

AGENCY: Federal Aviation Administration (FAA), DOT.

ACTION: Final rule.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: This action establishes Class E airspace extending upward from
700 feet above the surface, at Washington Island Airport, Washington
Island, WI. Controlled airspace is necessary to accommodate new
standard instrument approach procedures developed at Washington Island
Airport, for the safety and management of instrument flight rules (IFR)
operations.

DATES: Effective 0901 UTC, November 8, 2018. The Director of the
Federal Register approves this incorporation by reference action under
Title 1, Code of Federal Regulations, part 51, subject to the annual
revision of FAA Order 7400.11 and publication of conforming amendments.

ADDRESSES: FAA Order 7400.11B, Airspace Designations and Reporting
Points, and subsequent amendments can be viewed online at http://www.faa.gov/air_traffic/publications/. For further information, you can
contact the Airspace Policy Group, Federal Aviation Administration, 800
Independence Avenue SW, Washington, DC 20591; telephone: (202) 267-
8783. The Order is also available for inspection at the National
Archives and Records Administration (NARA). For information on the
availability of FAA Order 7400.11B at NARA, call<PHONE_NUMBER>, or go
to https://www.archives.gov/federal-register/cfr/ibr-locations.html.
    FAA Order 7400.11, Airspace Designations and Reporting Points, is
published yearly and effective on September 15.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Rebecca Shelby, Federal Aviation
Administration, Operations Support Group, Central Service Center, 10101
Hillwood Parkway, Fort Worth, TX 76177; telephone<PHONE_NUMBER>.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

Authority for This Rulemaking

    The FAA's authority to issue rules regarding aviation safety is
found in Title 49 of the United States Code. Subtitle I, Section 106
describes the authority of the FAA Administrator. Subtitle VII,
Aviation Programs, describes in more detail the scope of the agency's
authority. This rulemaking is promulgated under the authority described
in Subtitle VII, Part A, Subpart I, Section 40103. Under that section,
the FAA is charged with prescribing regulations to assign the use of
airspace necessary to ensure the safety of aircraft and the efficient
use of airspace. This regulation is within the scope of that authority
as it establishes Class E airspace extending upward from 700 feet above
the surface, at Washington Island Airport, Washington Island, WI to
support IFR operations at the airport.

History

    On March 23, 2018, the FAA published in the Federal Register (83 FR
12688) Docket No. FAA-2018-0018, a notice of proposed rulemaking (NPRM)
to establish Class E airspace extending upward from 700 feet above the
surface, at Washington Island Airport, Washington Island, WI.
Interested parties were invited to participate in this rulemaking
effort by submitting written comments on the proposal to the FAA. No
comments were received.

Availability and Summary of Documents for Incorporation by Reference

    This document amends FAA Order 7400.11B, Airspace Designations and
Reporting Points, dated August 3, 2017, and effective September 15,
2017. FAA Order 7400.11B is publicly available as listed in the
ADDRESSES section of this document. FAA Order 7400.11B lists Class A,
B, C, D, and E airspace areas, air traffic service routes, and
reporting points.

The Rule

    This amendment to Title 14, Code of Federal Regulations (14 CFR)
part 71 establishes Class E airspace extending upward from 700 feet
above the surface to within a 6.0-mile radius of Washington Island
Airport, Washington Island, WI.
    Controlled airspace is necessary to accommodate new standard
instrument approach procedures developed at Washington Island Airport,
and for the safety and management of instrument flight rules (IFR)
operations.

Regulatory Notices and Analyses

    The FAA has determined that this regulation only involves an
established body of technical regulations for which frequent and
routine amendments are necessary to keep them operationally current, is
non-controversial and unlikely to result in adverse or negative
comments. It, therefore: (1) Is not a ``significant regulatory action''
under Executive Order 12866; (2) is not a ``significant rule'' under
DOT Regulatory Policies and Procedures (44 FR 11034; February 26,
1979); and (3) does not warrant preparation of a regulatory evaluation
as the anticipated impact is so minimal. Since this is a routine matter
that only affects air traffic procedures and air navigation, it is
certified that this rule, when promulgated, does not have a significant
economic impact on a substantial number of small entities under the
criteria of the Regulatory Flexibility Act.

Environmental Review

    The FAA has determined that this action qualifies for categorical
exclusion under the National Environmental Policy Act in accordance
with FAA Order 1050.1F, ``Environmental Impacts: Policies and
Procedures,'' paragraph 5-6.5.a. This airspace action is not expected
to cause any potentially significant environmental impacts, and no
extraordinary circumstances exist that warrant preparation of an
environmental assessment.

Lists of Subjects in 14 CFR Part 71

    Airspace, Incorporation by reference, Navigation (air).

Adoption of the Amendment

    In consideration of the foregoing, the Federal Aviation
Administration amends 14 CFR part 71 as follows:

PART 71--DESIGNATION OF CLASS A, B, C, D, AND E AIRSPACE AREAS; AIR
TRAFFIC SERVICE ROUTES; AND REPORTING POINTS

0
1. The authority citation for part 71 continues to read as follows:

    Authority: 49 U.S.C. 106(f), 106(g); 40103, 40113, 40120; E.O.
10854, 24 FR 9565, 3 CFR, 1959-1963 Comp., p. 389.

Sec.  71.1  [Amended]

0
2. The incorporation by reference in 14 CFR 71.1 of FAA Order 7400.11B,
Airspace Designations and Reporting Points, dated August 3, 2017, and
effective September 15, 2017, is amended as follows:

Paragraph 6005 Class E Airspace Areas Extending Upward From 700
Feet or More Above the Surface of the Earth.

* * * * *

AGL WI E5 Washington Island, WI [New]

Washington Island Airport, WI
    (Lat. 45[deg]23'18'' N, long. 86[deg]55'27'' W)

    That airspace extending upward from 700 feet above the surface
within a 6-mile radius of the Washington Island Airport.

    Issued in Fort Worth, Texas, on September 5, 2018.
Walter Tweedy,
Acting Manager, Operations Support Group, ATO Central Service Center.
[FR Doc. 2018-19713 Filed 9-12-18; 8:45 am]
 BILLING CODE 4910-13-P


Tons per Year SO2 Tons per Year NH3 Tons per Year Atlantic 2,282 1,889 886 823 Bergen 2,164 1,540 2155 2390 Burlington 3,209 2,362 3568 1535 Camden 1,823 1,382 2038 1238 Cape May 1,468 1,254 13409 334 Cumberland 1,467 1,201 3281 652 Essex 1,682 1,280 4597 1934 Gloucester 2,103 1,514 7275 1006 Hudson 2,690 1,825 21653 1325 Hunterdon 1,426 908 695 934 Mercer 1,613 1,062 15594 1032 Middlesex 2,561 1,643 2395 2122 Monmouth 2,520 1,781 1947 1725 Morris 2,473 1,812 1529 1464 Ocean 3,091 2,341 1196 1291 Passaic 1,242 881 974 1126 Salem 1,234 927 5504 657 Somerset 1,435 797 744 1092 Sussex 1,849 1,449 733 674 Union 1,569 1,330 3856 1467 Warren 1,629 1,205 643 688 Total in State 41,538 30,381 94672 25514 NOTES: ( 1) These totals include adjusted emissions from fugitive dust categories. See Attachment 2 of this report for further discussion. 45 Table XIX 2002 Statewide Emission Inventory by County and Source Sector VOC Tons per Summer Day VOC Tons per Year County Point Sources Area Sources Onroad Sources Nonroad Sources Biogenic Point Sources Area Sources Onroad Sources Nonroad Sources Biogenic Atlantic 0.15 11.04 12.85 10.25 40.38 52 5,492 3,613 3,521 14,748 Bergen 5.72 36.86 36.09 22.05 4.60 773 11,243 14,048 6,361 1,681 Burlington 4.02 17.54 15.80 10.01 39.84 927 7,057 6,278 3,000 14,552 Camden 1.23 22.68 13.80 7.23 20.06 453 7,228 5,512 2,110 7,326 Cape May 0.20 5.26 4.72 22.61 19.55 39 2,474 1,348 8,480 7,140 Cumberland 0.46 8.93 5.37 11.03 28.41 102 3,208 1,492 4,196 10,377 Essex 2.95 31.53 18.26 11.92 3.40 791 9,568 7,238 3,739 1,244 Gloucester 32.01 20.39 9.10 5.91 16.83 11,560 7,032 3,650 1,686 6,148 Hudson 7.33 21.09 9.10 5.22 3.27 2,104 6,628 3,567 1,617 1,195 Hunterdon 0.64 5.49 5.99 3.66 12.44 144 2,468 2,441 1,038 4,545 Mercer 2.13 13.06 11.60 7.01 12.65 446 4,445 4,636 1,922 4,619 Middlesex 16.08 34.87 26.00 14.58 12.78 4,366 10,594 10,478 4,115 4,669 Monmouth 1.37 24.65 22.26 21.26 22.00 287 8,477 8,973 6,996 8,036 Morris 1.27 20.81 18.87 15.09 13.75 309 7,947 7,662 4,211 5,024 Ocean 0.26 24.01 14.30 21.54 43.80 76 7,746 5,792 7,714 15,998 Passaic 1.99 19.84 10.22 6.62 11.04 253 6,537 4,109 2,081 4,034 Salem 4.92 3.47 4.23 3.37 18.64 1,034 1,516 1,205 1,162 6,809 Somerset 0.73 12.29 10.65 6.87 12.20 224 4,075 4,311 1,898 4,455 Sussex 0.25 5.69 4.62 3.86 20.48 38 3,656 1,881 1,490 7,479 Union 26.56 25.26 15.92 7.75 2.31 5,382 7,652 6,354 2,237 843 Warren 2.88 5.07 4.99 2.78 13.50 809 2,631 2,001 832 4,931 Total in State 113.15 369.83 274.74 220.60 371.95 30,169 127,673 106,589 70,407 135,851 46 Table XIX ( cont.)   2002 Statewide Emission Inventory by County and Source Sector NOx Tons per Summer Day NOx Tons per Year County Point Sources Area Sources Onroad Sources Nonroad Sources Biogenic Point Sources Area Sources Onroad Sources Nonroad Sources Biogenic Atlantic 1.67 1.17 24.50 6.26 0.21 129 964 6,764 1,771 78 Bergen 3.64 3.83 63.24 23.38 0.07 988 2,815 23,917 6,707 25 Burlington 12.35 1.77 31.10 12.88 0.26 1,273 1,424 11,644 3,776 97 Camden 2.69 2.10 27.00 9.44 0.21 776 1,523 10,074 2,669 77 Cape May 19.15 0.42 8.82 5.92 0.19 3,819 357 2,433 1,959 68 Cumberland 10.50 0.65 10.61 7.94 0.34 1,778 469 2,883 2,574 125 Essex 16.18 3.31 44.06 25.70 0.07 2,441 2,436 16,537 8,137 27 Gloucester 14.48 1.01 18.50 8.01 0.19 4,645 800 6,899 2,200 71 Hudson 51.61 2.24 21.05 20.71 0.07 9,776 1,735 7,853 5,976 27 Hunterdon 9.47 0.54 17.17 4.70 0.19 491 424 6,444 1,223 69 Mercer 47.87 1.72 22.70 9.32 0.20 13,034 1,257 8,505 2,427 72 Middlesex 44.47 3.33 58.00 17.54 0.16 3,651 2,343 22,147 4,849 58 Monmouth 0.86 2.23 38.15 15.74 0.22 240 1,806 14,860 4,316 79 Morris 1.18 2.40 35.06 11.58 0.12 284 1,752 13,748 3,151 43 Ocean 3.68 2.39 24.65 7.57 0.27 395 1,507 9,538 2,138 98 Passaic 0.68 1.79 23.01 8.88 0.10 122 1,361 8,748 2,413 38 Salem 15.26 0.31 11.91 3.21 0.32 3,267 227 3,185 932 116 Somerset 3.60 1.44 23.85 7.57 0.15 313 1,048 9,090 2,097 54 Sussex 0.21 0.57 7.47 2.46 0.15 39 495 2,936 615 55 Union 18.88 2.26 32.22 20.25 0.08 4,080 1,621 12,294 5,883 28 Warren 1.93 0.47 15.60 2.48 0.22 580 379 5,782 631 79 Total in State 280.36 35.92 558.66 231.56 3.78 52,121 26,742 206,280 66,443 1,382 47 Table XIX ( cont.)   2002 Statewide Emission Inventory by County and Source Sector Carbon Monoxide Tons per Summer Day Carbon Monoxide Tons per Year County Point Sources Area Sources Onroad Sources Nonroad Sources Biogenic Point Sources Area Sources Onroad Sources Nonroad Sources Biogenic Atlantic 0.36 2.66 155.53 70.26 2.96 66 10,726 53,885 19,798 1,080 Bergen 2.36 2.07 324.50 358.25 0.54 619 1,453 166,589 93,002 199 Burlington 1.48 1.97 168.90 121.35 3.33 413 9,709 83,768 31,350 1,216 Camden 3.28 6.89 145.90 112.44 1.57 1,154 3,789 72,489 29,402 574 Cape May 2.18 0.66 53.58 80.06 1.54 311 4,145 18,758 26,265 562 Cumberland 1.56 1.13 56.91 50.35 2.28 126 3,196 19,994 15,941 831 Essex 3.61 2.40 187.93 182.98 0.45 624 1,306 96,967 53,407 164 Gloucester 3.27 1.54 99.80 77.69 1.41 1,029 4,513 49,458 19,203 516 Hudson 9.42 1.22 87.49 68.72 0.44 2,058 896 44,767 20,015 161 Hunterdon 6.43 1.03 64.94 48.31 1.60 259 3,973 34,283 11,896 585 Mercer 1.51 1.37 122.70 104.18 1.42 323 2,567 61,101 25,685 518 Middlesex 34.20 2.54 287.54 228.84 1.16 3,034 1,309 149,288 57,965 424 Monmouth 1.28 1.79 227.22 212.60 1.98 381 5,252 118,952 55,614 722 Morris 2.24 2.35 209.14 227.91 1.42 266 8,121 109,947 56,136 519 Ocean 1.21 29.78 135.96 143.85 3.89 271 10,563 72,072 40,914 1,420 Passaic 0.40 1.23 105.86 98.09 1.13 68 2,985 55,414 26,769 412 Salem 2.28 0.57 49.04 21.42 1.63 487 2,389 17,071 5,991 595 Somerset 5.96 1.16 112.52 107.75 1.40 226 2,079 59,270 26,731 511 Sussex 0.33 1.80 42.35 37.57 2.00 83 8,995 23,055 10,883 731 Union 3.87 1.11 162.44 118.31 0.36 1,012 794 84,178 31,780 133 Warren 2.12 1.19 56.12 26.89 1.58 444 5,306 29,700 7,198 578 Total in State 89.35 66.45 2,856.37 2,497.80 34.09 13,254 94,067 1,421,004 665,944 12,451 48 Table XIX ( cont.)   2002 Statewide Emission Inventory by County and Source Sector PM10 ( 1)

Tons per Year PM2.5 ( 1)

Tons per Year County Point Sources Area Sources Onroad Sources Nonroad Sources Biogenic Point Sources Area Sources Onroad Sources Nonroad Sources Biogenic Atlantic 17 1,863 154 248 NA 19 1,541 104 225 NA Bergen 135 981 524 524 NA 149 537 376 478 NA Burlington 318 2,145 275 471 NA 308 1,448 193 413 NA Camden 126 1,210 238 249 NA 233 754 167 228 NA Cape May 102 799 58 509 NA 109 637 40 468 NA Cumberland 266 721 73 407 NA 280 495 52 374 NA Essex 203 646 389 444 NA 185 411 291 393 NA Gloucester 531 1,169 161 242 NA 426 754 112 222 NA Hudson 1,705 431 179 375 NA 1,077 269 134 345 NA Hunterdon 50 1,115 148 113 NA 50 644 111 103 NA Mercer 221 967 201 224 NA 188 530 141 203 NA Middlesex 537 1,162 486 376 NA 483 467 347 346 NA Monmouth 48 1,575 352 545 NA 55 981 244 501 NA Morris 46 1,813 305 309 NA 39 1,284 209 280 NA Ocean 39 2,377 229 446 NA 38 1,734 160 409 NA Passaic 18 835 195 194 NA 19 543 141 178 NA Salem 435 590 77 132 NA 371 377 57 122 NA Somerset 76 984 211 164 NA 55 441 152 149 NA Sussex 6 1,667 77 99 NA 5 1,301 54 89 NA Union 434 512 261 362 NA 540 272 185 333 NA Warren 240 1,195 123 71 NA 240 809 92 64 NA Total in State 5,555 24,760 4,718 6,505 NA 4,868 16,230 3,361 5,922 NA NOTES:

( 1) These totals include adjusted emissions from fugitive dust categories. See Attachment 2 of this report for further discussion. 49 Table XIX ( cont.)   2002 Statewide Emission Inventory by County and Source Sector SO2 Tons per Year NH3 Tons per Year County Point Sources Area Sources Onroad Sources Nonroad Sources Biogenic Point Sources Area Sources Onroad Sources Nonroad Sources Biogenic Atlantic 10 498 202 176 NA 0 184 297 13 329 Bergen 82 819 634 620 NA 0 543 821 163 863 Burlington 286 459 361 2,462 NA 0 522 454 39 520 Camden 162 506 313 1,057 NA 0 281 393 46 518 Cape May 12,178 163 75 993 NA 5 86 107 6 130 Cumberland 665 412 89 2,115 NA 1 310 118 20 203 Essex 2,110 1,078 429 980 NA 0 598 492 82 762 Gloucester 5,431 390 211 1,243 NA 0 445 265 22 274 Hudson 19,250 625 196 1,582 NA 14 461 222 56 572 Hunterdon 18 391 163 123 NA 0 569 187 14 164 Mercer 14,379 450 264 501 NA 3 310 331 41 347 Middlesex 504 689 590 612 NA 11 492 765 108 746 Monmouth 55 510 453 929 NA 0 399 628 47 651 Morris 52 798 403 276 NA 0 273 572 75 544 Ocean 38 652 290 216 NA 0 258 396 21 616 Passaic 26 494 231 223 NA 0 264 292 65 505 Salem 4,590 156 85 673 NA 1 463 97 7 89 Somerset 41 273 250 180 NA 0 423 317 43 309 Sussex 0 566 98 69 NA 0 296 135 8 235 Union 1,253 602 321 1,680 NA 3 456 425 82 501 Warren 101 345 134 63 NA 0 371 152 12 153 Total in State 61,231 10,876 5,793 16,772 NA 38 8,005 7,469 970 9,032 50 4. Emissions Comparison Summary A comparison of the 1996 man made emission inventory to the 2002 man made emission inventory for New Jersey is presented in Table XX, by pollutant and source sector. The 1996 inventory was chosen for comparison, because the 1999 area source inventory and portions of the 1999 nonroad inventory were projections of the 1996 base year inventory, therefore are also a reflection of the growth factors chosen, in addition to the methodologies used to calculated emissions. This comparison shows the following:

  Total man made VOC, summer tons per day: Overall slight decrease, decreases in point and onroad, increases in area and nonroad;   Total man made NOx summer tons per day: Overall slight increase, slight decreases in point, area and nonroad, increase in onroad; and,   Total man made CO summer tons per day: Overall increase, increases in point, area, nonroad and onroad.

More detailed discussions of increases and decreases in emissions are included in the individual sector comparisons in Appendix D. Decreases are due primarily to federal and state rules that control emissions from industries such as the NOx Budget Program; revisions in federal engine standards; reformulated gasoline; and basic inspection and maintenance programs. Increases are due primarily to population growth and increases in vehicle miles traveled; changes in calculation and model methodologies and inputs; and the addition of new emission sources not previously included in the inventory. Table XX 1996 and 2002 Statewide Emission Inventory by Source Sector and Pollutant VOC NOx CO Source Sector 1996 Tons per Summer Day 2002 Tons per Summer Day 1996 Tons per Summer Day 2002 Tons per Summer Day 1996 Tons per Summer Day 2002 Tons per Summer Day Point 173.22 113.15 291.05 280.36 78.45 89.35 Area 304.98 369.83 39.66 35.92 26.89 66.45 Onroad 309.01 274.74 453.82 558.66 2,182.99 2,856.37 Nonroad 203.73 220.60 269.24 231.56 2,152.25 2,497.80 Total in State 990.94 978.32 1,053.77 1106.50 4,440.58 5,509.97 V. Public Participation New Jersey is planning on holding a public hearing on the proposed SIP revisions. Notice of the hearing will be published in several newspapers throughout the State before the date of the public hearing. A complete description of the public hearing process, the comments received and New Jersey's response to those comments will be included in the final SIP document.