[Federal Register Volume 82, Number 151 (Tuesday, August 8, 2017)]
[Notices]
[Pages 37106-37107]
[FR Doc No: 2017-16627]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY

Federal Emergency Management Agency

[Docket ID: FEMA-2017-0015; OMB No. 1660-0025]

Agency Information Collection Activities: Submission for OMB
Review; Comment Request; Non-Disaster (ND) Grants System

AGENCY: Federal Emergency Management Agency, DHS.

ACTION: Notice and request for comments.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA) will submit the
information collection abstracted below to the Office of Management and
Budget for review and clearance in accordance with the requirements of
the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995. The submission will describe the
nature of the information collection, the categories of respondents,
the estimated burden (i.e., the time, effort and resources used by
respondents to respond) and cost, and the actual data collection
instruments FEMA will use.

DATES: Comments must be submitted on or before September 7, 2017.

ADDRESSES: Submit written comments on the proposed information
collection to the Office of Information and Regulatory Affairs, Office
of Management and Budget. Comments should be addressed to the Desk
Officer for the Department of Homeland Security, Federal Emergency
Management Agency, and sent via electronic mail to
<EMAIL_ADDRESS>
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Requests for additional information or
copies of the information collection should be made to Director,
Records Management Division, 500 C Street SW., Washington, DC 20472-
3100, or email address<EMAIL_ADDRESS>Or, Everett Yuille, Branch Chief (Systems and
Business Support Branch), FEMA, Grant Programs Directorate, Grant
Operations Division, at<PHONE_NUMBER>.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:  This proposed information collection
previously published in the Federal Register on May 11, 2017 at 82 FR
22013 with a 60 day public comment period. No comments were received.
The purpose of this notice is to notify the public that FEMA will
submit the information collection abstracted below to the Office of
Management and Budget for review and clearance.

Collection of Information

    Title: Non-Disaster (ND) Grants System.
    Type of information collection: Revision of a currently approved
information collection.
    OMB Number: 1660-0025.
    Form Titles and Numbers: FEMA Form 080-0-0-15, Non-Disaster (ND)
Grants System.
    Abstract: ND Grants is a web-based grants management system that
fulfills FEMA's strategic initiative to consolidate the entire non-
disaster grants management lifecycle into a single system. Currently,
ND Grants has functionality that supports the grantee application
process, award acceptance, amendments, and performance reporting.
    Affected Public: State, Local or Tribal Government.
    Estimated Number of Respondents: 2,380.
    Estimated Number of Responses: 52,598.
    Estimated Total Annual Burden Hours: 26,299 hours.
    Estimated Total Annual Respondent Cost: The estimated annual cost
to respondents for the hour burden is $988,053.43.
    Estimated Respondents' Operation and Maintenance Costs: There are
no annual costs to respondents' operations and maintenance costs for
technical services.
    Estimated Respondents' Capital and Start-Up Costs: There are no
annual start-up or capital costs.
    Estimated Total Annual Cost to the Federal Government: The cost to
the Federal Government is $8,244,902.03.

Comments

    Comments may be submitted as indicated in the ADDRESSES caption
above. Comments are solicited to (a) evaluate whether the proposed data
collection is necessary for the proper performance of the agency,
including whether the information shall have practical utility; (b)
evaluate the accuracy of the agency's estimate of the burden of the
proposed collection of information, including the validity of the
methodology and assumptions used; (c) enhance the quality, utility, and
clarity of the information to be

collected; and (d) minimize the burden of the collection of information
on those who are to respond, including through the use of appropriate
automated, electronic, mechanical, or other technological collection
techniques or other forms of information technology, e.g., permitting
electronic submission of responses.

    Dated: August 2, 2017.
Tammi Hines,
Records Management Program Chief, Mission Support, Federal Emergency
Management Agency, Department of Homeland Security.
[FR Doc. 2017-16627 Filed 8-7-17; 8:45 am]
 BILLING CODE 9111-46-P


[Federal Register Volume 77, Number 75 (Wednesday, April 18, 2012)]
[Proposed Rules]
[Pages 23172-23173]
[FR Doc No: 2012-9318]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION

Federal Aviation Administration

14 CFR Part 71

[Docket No. FAA-2012-0345; Airspace Docket No. 12-AWP-3]

Proposed Amendment of Class E Airspace; Woodland, CA

AGENCY: Federal Aviation Administration (FAA), DOT.

ACTION: Notice of proposed rulemaking (NPRM).

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: This action proposes to amend Class E airspace at Watts-
Woodland Airport, Woodland, CA. The proposed decommissioning of the
Travis VHF Omni-Directional Radio Range (VOR) has made this action
necessary for the safety and management of Instrument Flight Rules
(IFR) operations at the airport.

DATES: Comments must be received on or before June 4, 2012.

ADDRESSES: Send comments on this proposal to the U.S. Department of
Transportation, Docket Operations, M-30, West Building Ground Floor,
Room W12-140, 1200 New Jersey Avenue SE., Washington, DC 20590;
telephone<PHONE_NUMBER>. You must identify FAA Docket No. FAA-2012-
0345; Airspace Docket No. 12-AWP-3, at the beginning of your comments.
You may also submit comments through the Internet at http://www.regulations.gov.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Eldon Taylor, Federal Aviation
Administration, Operations Support Group, Western Service Center, 1601
Lind Avenue SW., Renton, WA 98057; telephone<PHONE_NUMBER>.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

Comments Invited

    Interested parties are invited to participate in this proposed
rulemaking by submitting such written data, views, or arguments, as
they may desire. Comments that provide the factual basis supporting the
views and suggestions presented are particularly helpful in developing
reasoned regulatory decisions on the proposal. Comments are
specifically invited on the overall regulatory, aeronautical, economic,
environmental, and energy-related aspects of the proposal.
    Communications should identify both docket numbers (FAA Docket No.
FAA 2012-0345 and Airspace Docket No. 12-AWP-3) and be submitted in
triplicate to the Docket Management System (see ADDRESSES section for
address and phone number). You may also submit comments through the
Internet at http://www.regulations.gov.
    Commenters wishing the FAA to acknowledge receipt of their comments
on this action must submit with those comments a self-addressed stamped
postcard on which the following statement is made: ``Comments to FAA
Docket No. FAA-2012-0345 and Airspace Docket No. 12-AWP-3''. The
postcard will be date/time stamped and returned to the commenter.
    All communications received on or before the specified closing date
for comments will be considered before taking action on the proposed
rule. The proposal contained in this action may be changed in light of
comments received. All comments submitted will be available for
examination in the public docket both before and after the closing date
for comments. A report summarizing each substantive public contact with
FAA personnel concerned with this rulemaking will be filed in the
docket.

Availability of NPRM's

    An electronic copy of this document may be downloaded through the

Internet at http://www.regulations.gov. Recently published rulemaking
documents can also be accessed through the FAA's web page at http://www.faa.gov/airports_airtraffic/air_traffic/publications/airspace_amendments/.
    You may review the public docket containing the proposal, any
comments received, and any final disposition in person in the Dockets
Office (see the ADDRESSES section for the address and phone number)
between 9 a.m. and 5 p.m., Monday through Friday, except federal
holidays. An informal docket may also be examined during normal
business hours at the Northwest Mountain Regional Office of the Federal
Aviation Administration, Air Traffic Organization, Western Service
Center, Operations Support Group, 1601 Lind Avenue SW., Renton, WA
98057.
    Persons interested in being placed on a mailing list for future
NPRM's should contact the FAA's Office of Rulemaking,<PHONE_NUMBER>,
for a copy of Advisory Circular No. 11-2A, Notice of Proposed
Rulemaking Distribution System, which describes the application
procedure.

The Proposal

    The FAA is proposing an amendment to Title 14 Code of Federal
Regulations (14 CFR) Part 71 by amending Class E airspace extending
upward from 700 feet above the surface at Watts-Woodland Airport,
Woodland, CA. Airspace reconfiguration is necessary due to the proposed
decommissioning of the Travis VOR and would enhance the safety and
management of aircraft operations at the airport.
    Class E airspace designations are published in paragraph 6005, of
FAA Order 7400.9V, dated August 9, 2011, and effective September 15,
2011, which is incorporated by reference in 14 CFR Part 71.1. The Class
E airspace designation listed in this document will be published
subsequently in this Order.
    The FAA has determined this proposed regulation only involves an
established body of technical regulations for which frequent and
routine amendments are necessary to keep them operationally current.
Therefore, this proposed regulation; (1) is not a ``significant
regulatory action'' under Executive Order 12866; (2) is not a
``significant rule'' under DOT Regulatory Policies and Procedures (44
FR 11034; February 26, 1979); and (3) does not warrant preparation of a
regulatory evaluation as the anticipated impact is so minimal. Since
this is a routine matter that will only affect air traffic procedures
and air navigation, it is certified this proposed rule, when
promulgated, would not have a significant economic impact on a
substantial number of small entities under the criteria of the
Regulatory Flexibility Act.
    The FAA's authority to issue rules regarding aviation safety is
found in Title 49 of the U.S. Code. Subtitle 1, Section 106, describes
the authority for the FAA Administrator. Subtitle VII, Aviation
Programs, describes in more detail the scope of the agency's authority.
This rulemaking is promulgated under the authority described in
Subtitle VII, Part A, Subpart I, Section 40103. Under that section, the
FAA is charged with prescribing regulations to assign the use of the
airspace necessary to ensure the safety of aircraft and the efficient
use of airspace. This regulation is within the scope of that authority
as it would modify controlled airspace at Watts-Woodland Airport,
Woodland, CA.
    This proposal will be subject to an environmental analysis in
accordance with FAA Order 1050.1E, ``Environmental Impacts: Policies
and Procedures'' prior to any FAA final regulatory action.

List of Subjects in 14 CFR Part 71

    Airspace, Incorporation by reference, Navigation (air).

The Proposed Amendment

    Accordingly, pursuant to the authority delegated to me, the Federal
Aviation Administration proposes to amend 14 CFR Part 71 as follows:

PART 71--DESIGNATION OF CLASS A, B, C, D AND E AIRSPACE AREAS; AIR
TRAFFIC SERVICE ROUTES; AND REPORTING POINTS

    1. The authority citation for 14 CFR Part 71 continues to read as
follows:

    Authority:  49 U.S.C. 106(g), 40103, 40113, 40120; E.O. 10854,
24 FR 9565, 3 CFR, 1959-1963 Comp., p. 389.

Sec.  71.1  [Amended]

    2. The incorporation by reference in 14 CFR 71.1 of the Federal
Aviation Administration Order 7400.9V, Airspace Designations and
Reporting Points, dated August 9, 2011, and effective September 15,
2011 is amended as follows:

Paragraph 6005 Class E airspace areas extending upward from 700
feet or more above the surface of the earth.

* * * * *

AWP CA E5 Woodland, CA [Amended]

Woodland, Watts-Woodland Airport, CA
    (Lat. 38[deg]40'26'' N., long. 121[deg]52'20'' W.)

    That airspace extending upward from 700 feet above the surface
within a 2.6-mile radius of Watts-Woodland Airport, and within 2.6
miles each side of the Watts-Woodland Airport 133[deg] bearing
extending from the 2.6-mile radius to 8.1 miles southeast of the
Watts-Woodland Airport, and within 1.8 miles each side of the Watts-
Woodland Airport 172[deg] bearing extending from the 2.6-mile radius
to 6 miles south of the airport, and within 1.9 miles each side of
the Watts-Woodland Airport 345[deg] bearing extending from the 2.6-
mile radius to 7 miles north of the airport.

    Issued in Seattle, Washington, on April 11, 2012.
John Warner,
Manager, Operations Support Group, Western Service Center.
[FR Doc. 2012-9318 Filed 4-17-12; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910-13-P


[Federal Register: November 2, 2005 (Volume 70, Number 211)]
[Notices]
[Page 66374]
[DOCID:fr02no05-64]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission

[Docket Nos. AI05-1-000 and AC06-5-000]

Jurisdictional Public Utilities and Licensees; Natural Gas
Companies Oil Pipeline Companies; El Paso Natural Gas Company; Notice
of Accounting Assessment Costs

October 21, 2005.
    Take notice that on October 19, 2005, El Paso Natural Gas Company
(El Paso) tendered for filing a request for approval by the Chief
Accountant to adopt the provisions of the June 30, 2005 Order under
Docket No. AI05-1-00, effective December 1, 2005.\1\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \1\ Jurisdictional Public Utilities and Licensees, Natural Gas
Companies, Oil Pipeline Companies, 111 FERC ] 61,501 (2005).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    Any person desiring to intervene or to protest this filing must
file in accordance with Rules 211 and 214 of the Commission's Rules of
Practice and Procedure (18 CFR 385.211 and 385.214). Protests will be
considered by the Commission in determining the appropriate action to
be taken, but will not serve to make protestants parties to the
proceeding. Any person wishing to become a party must file a notice of
intervention or motion to intervene, as appropriate. Such notices,
motions, or protests must be filed on or before the date as indicated
below. Anyone filing an intervention or protest must serve a copy of
that document on the Applicant. Anyone filing an intervention or
protest on or before the intervention or protest date need not serve
motions to intervene or protests on persons other than the Applicant.
    The Commission encourages electronic submission of protests and
interventions in lieu of paper using the ``eFiling'' link at http://www.ferc.gov.
 Persons unable to file electronically should submit an

original and 14 copies of the protest or intervention to the Federal
Energy Regulatory Commission, 888 First Street, NE., Washington, DC
20426.
    This filing is accessible on-line at http://www.ferc.gov, using the

``eLibrary'' link and is available for review in the Commission's
Public Reference Room in Washington, DC. There is an ``eSubscription''
link on the Web site that enables subscribers to receive e-mail
notification when a document is added to a subscribed docket(s). For
assistance with any FERC Online service, please e-mail
<EMAIL_ADDRESS>or call<PHONE_NUMBER> (toll free). For

TTY, call<PHONE_NUMBER>.
    Comment Date: 5 p.m. Eastern Time October 28, 2005.

Magalie R. Salas,
Secretary.
 [FR Doc. E5-6031 Filed 11-1-05; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 6717-01-P


[Federal Register Volume 81, Number 145 (Thursday, July 28, 2016)]
[Proposed Rules]
[Pages 49575-49577]
[FR Doc No: 2016-17719]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION

Federal Aviation Administration

14 CFR Part 39

[Docket No. FAA-2016-6990; Directorate Identifier 2016-NE-14-AD]
RIN 2120-AA64

Airworthiness Directives; Turbomeca S.A. Turboshaft Engines

AGENCY: Federal Aviation Administration (FAA), DOT.

ACTION: Notice of proposed rulemaking (NPRM).

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: We propose to adopt a new airworthiness directive (AD) for
certain Turbomeca S.A. Arriel 1, 1A, 1A1, 1A2, 1B, 1B2, 1C, 1C1, 1C2,
1D, 1D1, 1E, 1E2, 1K1, 1S, and 1S1 turboshaft engines. This proposed AD
was prompted by an anomaly that occurred during the grinding operation
required by modification TU376, which increases the clearance between
the rear curvic coupling of the centrifugal impeller and the fuel
injection manifold. This proposed AD would require removing the
centrifugal impeller and replacing with a part eligible for
installation. We are proposing this AD to prevent failure of the
centrifugal impeller, uncontained centrifugal impeller release, damage
to the engine, and damage to the helicopter.

DATES: We must receive comments on this NPRM by September 26, 2016.

ADDRESSES: You may send comments by any of the following methods:
     Federal eRulemaking Portal: Go to http://www.regulations.gov. Follow the instructions for submitting comments.
     Mail: Docket Management Facility, U.S. Department of
Transportation, 1200 New Jersey Avenue SE., West Building Ground Floor,
Room W12-140, Washington, DC 20590-0001.
     Hand Delivery: Deliver to Mail address above between 9
a.m. and 5 p.m., Monday through Friday, except Federal holidays.
     Fax:<PHONE_NUMBER>.
    For service information identified in this proposed AD, contact
Turbomeca S.A., 40220 Tarnos, France; phone: 33 (0)5 59 74 40 00; fax:
33 (0)5 59 74 45 15. You may view this service information at the FAA,
Engine & Propeller Directorate, 1200 District Avenue, Burlington, MA.
For information on the availability of this material at the FAA, call
781-238-7125.

Examining the AD Docket

    You may examine the AD docket on the Internet at http://www.regulations.gov by searching for and locating Docket No. FAA-2016-
6990; or in person at the Docket Operations office between 9 a.m. and 5
p.m., Monday through Friday, except Federal holidays. The AD docket
contains this proposed AD, the mandatory continuing airworthiness
information (MCAI), the regulatory evaluation, any comments received,
and other information. The address for the Docket Office (phone: 800-
647-5527) is in the ADDRESSES section. Comments will be available in
the AD docket shortly after receipt.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Philip Haberlen, Aerospace Engineer,
Engine Certification Office, FAA, Engine & Propeller Directorate, 1200
District Avenue, Burlington, MA 01803; phone:<PHONE_NUMBER>; fax: 781-
238-7199; email<EMAIL_ADDRESS>
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

Comments Invited

    We invite you to send any written relevant data, views, or
arguments about this proposed AD. Send your comments to an address
listed under the ADDRESSES section. Include ``Docket No. FAA-2016-6990;
Directorate Identifier 2016-NE-14-AD'' at the beginning of your
comments. We specifically invite

comments on the overall regulatory, economic, environmental, and energy
aspects of this proposed AD. We will consider all comments received by
the closing date and may amend this proposed AD based on those
comments.
    We will post all comments we receive, without change, to http://www.regulations.gov, including any personal information you provide. We
will also post a report summarizing each substantive verbal contact
with FAA personnel concerning this proposed AD.

Discussion

    The European Aviation Safety Agency (EASA), which is the Technical
Agent for the Member States of the European Community, has issued EASA
AD 2016-0090, dated May 10, 2016 (referred to hereinafter as ``the
MCAI''), to correct an unsafe condition for the specified products. The
MCAI states:

    Turbomeca reported an anomaly that was generated during the
grinding operation associated to the application of modification
TU376, which increases the clearance between the rear curvic
coupling of the centrifugal impeller and the fuel injection
manifold.
    This condition, if not corrected, could lead to crack initiation
and propagation in the centrifugal impeller bore area, possibly
resulting in centrifugal impeller failure, with consequent damage
to, and reduced control of, the helicopter. To address this
potential unsafe condition, the life of the affected centrifugal
impellers was reduced and Turbomeca published Mandatory Service
Bulletin (MSB) 292 72 0848 to inform operators about the life
reduction and to provide instructions for the replacement of the
affected centrifugal impellers.
    For the reasons described above, this AD requires replacement of
each affected centrifugal impeller before it exceeds the applicable
reduced life limit.

    You may obtain further information by examining the MCAI in the AD
docket on the Internet at http://www.regulations.gov by searching for
and locating Docket No. FAA-2016-6990.

Related Service Information

    Turbomeca S.A. has issued Mandatory Service Bulletin (MSB) 292 72
0848, Version B, dated April 13, 2016. The MSB describes procedures for
reducing the life limit of the centrifugal impellers affected by an
anomaly that occurred during the grinding operation required by
modification TU376. This service information is reasonably available
because the interested parties have access to it through their normal
course of business or by the means identified in the ADDRESSES section.

FAA's Determination and Requirements of This Proposed AD

    This product has been approved by the aviation authority of France,
and is approved for operation in the United States. Pursuant to our
bilateral agreement with the European Community, EASA has notified us
of the unsafe condition described in the MCAI and service information
referenced above. We are proposing this AD because we evaluated all
information provided by EASA and determined the unsafe condition exists
and is likely to exist or develop on other products of the same type
design. This proposed AD would require removal of the centrifugal
impeller from service before exceeding the reduced life limit shown in
Appendix 1 of EASA AD 2016-0090, dated May 10, 2016, and replacement
with a part eligible for installation.

Costs of Compliance

    We estimate that this proposed AD affects 3 engines installed on
helicopters of U.S. registry. We also estimate that it would take about
22 hours per engine to comply with this proposed AD. The average labor
rate is $85 per hour. Required parts cost about $96,518 per engine.
Based on these figures, we estimate the cost of this proposed AD on
U.S. operators to be $295,164.

Authority for This Rulemaking

    Title 49 of the United States Code specifies the FAA's authority to
issue rules on aviation safety. Subtitle I, section 106, describes the
authority of the FAA Administrator. ``Subtitle VII: Aviation
Programs,'' describes in more detail the scope of the Agency's
authority.
    We are issuing this rulemaking under the authority described in
``Subtitle VII, Part A, Subpart III, Section 44701: General
requirements.'' Under that section, Congress charges the FAA with
promoting safe flight of civil aircraft in air commerce by prescribing
regulations for practices, methods, and procedures the Administrator
finds necessary for safety in air commerce. This regulation is within
the scope of that authority because it addresses an unsafe condition
that is likely to exist or develop on products identified in this
rulemaking action.

Regulatory Findings

    We determined that this proposed AD would not have federalism
implications under Executive Order 13132. This proposed AD would not
have a substantial direct effect on the States, on the relationship
between the national Government and the States, or on the distribution
of power and responsibilities among the various levels of government.
    For the reasons discussed above, I certify this proposed
regulation:
    (1) Is not a ``significant regulatory action'' under Executive
Order 12866,
    (2) Is not a ``significant rule'' under the DOT Regulatory Policies
and Procedures (44 FR 11034, February 26, 1979),
    (3) Will not affect intrastate aviation in Alaska to the extent
that it justifies making a regulatory distinction, and
    (4) Will not have a significant economic impact, positive or
negative, on a substantial number of small entities under the criteria
of the Regulatory Flexibility Act.

List of Subjects in 14 CFR Part 39

    Air transportation, Aircraft, Aviation safety, Incorporation by
reference, Safety.

The Proposed Amendment

    Accordingly, under the authority delegated to me by the
Administrator, the FAA proposes to amend 14 CFR part 39 as follows:

PART 39--AIRWORTHINESS DIRECTIVES

0
1. The authority citation for part 39 continues to read as follows:

    Authority:  49 U.S.C. 106(g), 40113, 44701.

Sec.  39.13  [Amended]

0
2. The FAA amends Sec.  39.13 by adding the following new airworthiness
directive (AD):

Turbomeca S.A.: Docket No. FAA-2016-6990; Directorate Identifier
2016-NE-14-AD.

(a) Comments Due Date

    We must receive comments by September 26, 2016.

(b) Affected ADs

    None.

(c) Applicability

    This AD applies to certain Arriel 1, 1A, 1A1, 1A2, 1B, 1B2, 1C,
1C1, 1C2, 1D, 1D1, 1E, 1E2, 1K1, 1S, and 1S1 turboshaft engines,
with modification TU376 installed.

(d) Reason

    This AD was prompted by an anomaly that occurred during the
grinding operation required by modification TU376, which increases
the clearance between the rear curvic coupling of the centrifugal
impeller and the fuel injection manifold. We are issuing this AD to
prevent failure of the centrifugal impeller, uncontained centrifugal
impeller release, damage to the engine, and damage to the
helicopter.

(e) Actions and Compliance

    Comply with this AD within the compliance times specified,
unless already done.
    (1) Remove from service, any centrifugal impeller listed in
Table 1 to paragraph (e) of this AD, before exceeding the applicable
cycles since new (CSN) and replace with a centrifugal impeller not
listed in Table 1 to paragraph (e) of this AD.

           Table 1 to Paragraph (e)--Centrifugal Impeller CSNs
------------------------------------------------------------------------
             Part No.                    Serial No.             CSN
------------------------------------------------------------------------
0292254040........................  44..................           5,129
0292254040........................  1762FT..............          11,476
0292254050........................  1676CAR.............           6,281
0292254050........................  5333OTT.............           5,495
0292254050........................  5017OTT.............           5,491
0292254050........................  1136CAR.............           8,734
0292254050........................  3655OTT.............           4,600
0292254050........................  1757CAR.............           7,913
0292254050........................  1738CAR.............          10,640
0292254050........................  1149CAR.............          12,273
0292254050........................  2677OTT.............          11,145
0292254050........................  3109OTT.............          10,662
0292254050........................  3496OTT.............           5,562
0292254050........................  2074CAR.............           7,423
729225293A........................  290CAR..............           6,326
729225293A........................  1227FT..............           8,139
729225293A........................  504FB...............           4,600
729225293A........................  2517OTT.............           9,732
729225293A........................  2165OTT.............           6,163
729225293A........................  2194FT..............          11,461
729225293A........................  1331OTT.............          12,513
729225293A........................  1301FT..............           7,262
729225293A........................  1567FT..............           6,305
729225293A........................  783FB...............           8,307
729225293A........................  98OTT...............           9,492
------------------------------------------------------------------------

    (2) Reserved.

(f) Alternative Methods of Compliance (AMOCs)

    The Manager, Engine Certification Office, FAA, may approve AMOCs
for this AD. Use the procedures found in 14 CFR 39.19 to make your
request. You may email your request to<EMAIL_ADDRESS>
(g) Related Information

    (1) For more information about this AD, contact Philip Haberlen,
Aerospace Engineer, Engine Certification Office, FAA, Engine &
Propeller Directorate, 1200 District Avenue, Burlington, MA 01803;
phone:<PHONE_NUMBER>; fax:<PHONE_NUMBER>; email:
<EMAIL_ADDRESS>    (2) Refer to MCAI, European Aviation Safety Agency AD 2016-0090,
dated May 10, 2016, for more information. You may examine the MCAI
in the AD docket on the Internet at http://www.regulations.gov by
searching for and locating it in Docket No. FAA-2016-6990.
    (3) Turbomeca S.A. Mandatory Service Bulletin (MSB) 292 72 0848,
Version B, dated April 13, 2016, can be obtained from Turbomeca
S.A., using the contact information in paragraph (g)(4) of this
proposed AD.
    (4) For service information identified in this proposed AD,
contact Turbomeca S.A., 40220 Tarnos, France; phone: 33 (0)5 59 74
40 00; fax: 33 (0)5 59 74 45 15.
    (5) You may view this service information at the FAA, Engine &
Propeller Directorate, 1200 District Avenue, Burlington, MA. For
information on the availability of this material at the FAA, call
781-238-7125.

    Issued in Burlington, Massachusetts, on July 21, 2016.
Colleen M. D'Alessandro,
Manager, Engine & Propeller Directorate, Aircraft Certification
Service.
[FR Doc. 2016-17719 Filed 7-27-16; 8:45 am]
 BILLING CODE 4910-13-P


[Federal Register: April 25, 2007 (Volume 72, Number 79)]
[Notices]
[Page 20572-20573]
[DOCID:fr25ap07-121]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

[Release No. 34-55645; File No. SR-NASDAQ-2007-040]

Self-Regulatory Organizations; The NASDAQ Stock Market LLC;
Notice of Filing of Proposed Rule Change Relating to the Waiver of Fees
Upon Relisting of Companies Removed for Late Filings

April 19, 2007.
    Pursuant to section 19(b)(1) of the securities Exchange Act of 1934
(``Act'') \1\ and Rule 19b-4 thereunder,\2\ notice is hereby given that
on April 4, 2007, The NASDAQ Stock Market LLC (``Nasdaq'') filed with
the Securities and Exchange Commission (``Commission'') the proposed
rule change as described in Items I and II below, which Items have been
substantially prepared by Nasdaq. The Commission is publishing this
notice to solicit comments on the proposed rule change from interested
persons.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \1\ 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(1).
    \2\ 17 CFR 240.19b-4.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

I. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement of the Terms of Substance
of the Proposed Rule Change

    Nasdaq proposes to allow, in certain circumstances, a company to
relist without paying a new entry and application fee if the Company
was delisted solely for the failure to file a required periodic report
with the Commission or other appropriate regulatory authority. Nasdaq
also proposes to delete a separate, duplicative provision in the rules.
The text of the proposed rule change appears below. Proposed new
language is italicized and proposed deletions are in brackets.\3\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \3\ Changes are marked to the rule text that appears in the
electronic manual of Nasdaq found at http://nasdaq.complinet.com.

---------------------------------------------------------------------------

* * * * *
    IM-4500-5. Waiver of Fees Upon Relisting for Companies Removed for
Late Filings Entry Fees. Pursuant to Nasdaq's authority to waive
certain fees, Nasdaq has determined to waive the entry fee (including
the application fee) in the following circumstances:
    (1) the company was suspended and/or delisted from the Nasdaq Stock
Market solely for its failure to file a required periodic report with
the Commission or other appropriate regulatory authority, pursuant to
Rule 4310(c)(14) or 4320(e)(12); and
    (2) the company has regained compliance with this requirement and
applies to relist on Nasdaq within one year of the date it is delisted
from Nasdaq.
    Annual Fees. A company that meets the above requirements and
relists during the same year that it has previously paid an annual fee
will not be subject to a second annual fee in that same year.
* * * * *
4520. The Nasdaq Capital Market
    (a) No change.
    (b) No change.
    (1)-(5) No change.
    [(6) The issuer of each class of securities that is a non-U.S.
issue that is listed on the Nasdaq Capital Market shall pay to Nasdaq a
fee in connection with the issuance of additional shares, or in the
case of ADRs, the listing of additional shares underlying the ADRs. The
fee in connection with additional shares shall be $5,000 for any amount
of additional shares listed on an annual basis. This fee will be
assessed annually based on the issuer's total shares outstanding as
reported on its periodic reports filed with the SEC. There shall be no
fee, however, for issuances of up to 49,999 additional shares per
year.]
    (c)-(e) No change.
* * * * *

II. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement of the Purpose of, and
Statutory Basis for, the Proposed Rule Change

    In its filing with the Commission, Nasdaq included statements
concerning the purpose of, and basis for, the proposed rule change and
discussed any comments it received on the proposed rule change. The
text of these statements may be examined at the places specified in
Item III below. Nasdaq has prepared summaries, set forth in sections A,
B, and C below, of the most significant aspects of such statements.

A. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement of the Purpose of, and
Statutory Basis for, the Proposed Rule Change

1. Purpose
    Existing Nasdaq rules provide the authority to waive entry,
application and annual fees.\4\ Pursuant to this authority, Nasdaq has
determined to waive the entry and application fee for any company that
was suspended \5\ and/or delisted from the Nasdaq Stock Market solely
for its failure to file a required periodic report with the Commission
or other appropriate regulatory authority, if the company regains
compliance with this requirement and applies to relist on Nasdaq within
one year of the date it is delisted from Nasdaq. In addition, if such a
company relists during the same calendar year that it has previously
paid an annual fee, the company will not be subject to a second annual
fee in that same year.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \4\ Nasdaq Rules 4510(a)(5), 4520(a)(4), 4530(a)(4) and
4540(a)(2) provide authority to waive entry and application fees and
Nasdaq rules 4510(c)(2), 4510(d)(5), 4520(c)(4), 4530(b)(2) and
4540(b)(3) provide authority to waive annual fees. Nasdaq notes that
in several prior instances, the predecessor market operated by The
Nasdaq Stock Market, Inc. as a facility of the NASD filed listing
fee waivers of general applicability on an immediately effective
basis, pursuant to SEC rule 19b-4(f)(1), 17 CFR 240.19b-4(f)(1), as
a stated policy, practice, or interpretation with respect to the
meaning, administration, or enforcement of these existing rules.
See, e.g., Securities Exchange Act Release No. 49133 (January 28,
2004), 69 FR 5630 (February 5, 2004) (SR-NASD-2003-198); Securities
Exchange Act Release No. 49286 (February 19, 2004), 69 FR 8999
(February 26, 2004) (SR-NASD-2004-004). More recently, the New York
Stock Exchange has submitted a filing to waive listing fees subject
to Commission approval under section 19(b)(2) of the Act, 15 U.S.C.
78s(b)(2). See Securities Exchange Release No. 55421 (March 8,
2007), 72 FR 11925 (March 14, 2007) (SR-NYSE-2007-19). As a result,
Market Regulation staff has advised Nasdaq that this proposed rule
change should also be filed under section 19(b)(2). Although Nasdaq
is following staff's guidance in this case, Nasdaq notes that the
rules authorizing waivers of listing fees have been in effect for an
extensive period of time, having first been approved as NASD rules
in 1991, and then re-approved by the Commission as rules of Nasdaq
during its registration as a national securities exchange.
Accordingly, it is Nasdaq's view that nothing in this filing should
be construed to restrict Nasdaq's approved authority to waive
listing fees with respect to particular issuers in appropriate
circumstances, nor should this filing be construed to restrict the
submission of filings on an immediately effective basis in
appropriate circumstances.
    The Commission notes that the waiver authority referred to in
the Nasdaq Rules was specifically intended to grant Nasdaq
flexibility to waive fees on a case-by-case basis. See Securities
Exchange Release No. 28731 (January 2, 1991), 56 FR 906 (January 9,
1991) (SR-NASD-90-61). The Commission does not believe it is, as a
general matter, appropriate to allow for the waiver of fees to a
class of non-members without first providing interested persons an
opportunity to comment on the proposed rule change pursuant to
section 19(b)(2) under the Act.
    \5\ Nasdaq Rule 4802(f) requires a security to meet the
requirements for initial listing (which include the requirement to
pay the applicable listing fees) if the security has been the
subject of a decision to delist by a Listing Qualifications Panel,
the Nasdaq Listing and Hearing Review Council or the Nasdaq Board.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    Nasdaq believes that this waiver is appropriate given that, on
average, the review of such an issuer is likely to be simpler than the
typical application for several reasons. First, because these companies
were previously listed on Nasdaq and compliant with all requirements
except the filing requirement, it is more likely that they will be
compliant with all other quantitative and qualitative

requirements. Further, relevant information about these companies is
already contained in Nasdaq's compliance systems. Finally, Nasdaq
anticipates that there would be fewer questions concerning the
company's financial statements given that these companies will often
have undergone extensive review by their auditors and, in some cases,
by independent investigators and the Commission or other regulatory
entities, in order to resolve the issues that caused the late filings.
    Nasdaq is implementing these waivers to incent companies to re-list
on Nasdaq once they regain compliance with the periodic filing
requirement, rather than seek a listing elsewhere. Nasdaq believes that
this waiver is appropriate, especially because Nasdaq's rules governing
the delisting of companies that are delinquent in periodic reports are
generally stricter than those of other markets. As such, the proposed
waivers will promote competition between Nasdaq and other exchange
markets.
    The proposed rule change will not affect Nasdaq's commitment of
resources to its regulatory oversight of the listing process or its
other regulatory programs. Specifically, Nasdaq will still conduct a
complete review of these companies for compliance with Nasdaq listing
standards in the same manner as any other company applying for listing
on Nasdaq. Any fee waiver under this proposed rule is predicated on the
Company successfully completing that review process and demonstrating
compliance with the initial listing requirements.
    Finally, Nasdaq proposes to delete a duplicative provision in Rule
4520(b). Currently, Rule 4520(b)(6) is identical to Rule 4520(b)(2). As
such, Nasdaq proposes to delete Rule 4520(b)(6).
2. Statutory Basis
    Nasdaq believes that the proposed rule change is consistent with
the provisions of Section 6 of the Act,\6\ in general, and with Section
6(b)(4) of the Act,\7\ in particular. Nasdaq believes that the proposed
waivers are equitable and reasonable because these companies previously
paid entry and annual fees to Nasdaq and to again charge such fees
would impose duplicative costs.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \6\ 15 U.S.C. 78f.
    \7\ 15 U.S.C. 78f(b)(4).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

B. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement on Burden on Competition

    Nasdaq does not believe that the proposed rule change will impose
any burden on competition that is not necessary or appropriate in
furtherance of the purposes of the Act.

C. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement on Comments on the Proposed
Rule Change Received From Members, Participants or Others

    Written comments were neither solicited nor received.

III. Solicitation of Comments

    Interested persons are invited to submit written data, views, and
arguments concerning the foregoing, including whether the proposed rule
change is consistent with the Act. Comments may be submitted by any of
the following methods:

Electronic Comments

     Use the Commission's Internet comment form (http://www.sec.gov/rules/sro.shtml.
); or     Send an e-mail to<EMAIL_ADDRESS>Please include

File Number SR-NASDAQ-2007-040 on the subject line.

Paper Comments

     Send paper comments in triplicate to Nancy M. Morris,
Secretary, Securities and Exchange Commission, Station Place, 100 F
Street, NE., Washington, DC 20549-1090.
    All submissions should refer to File Number SR-NASDAQ-2007-040.
This file number should be included on the subject line if e-mail is
used. To help the Commission process and review your comments more
efficiently, please use only one method. The Commission will post all
comments on the Commission's Internet Web site (http://www.sec.gov/rules/sro.shtml
). Copies of the submission, all subsequent amendments,

all written statements with respect to the proposed rule change that
are filed with the Commission, and all written communications relating
to the proposed rule change between the Commission and any person,
other than those that may be withheld from the public in accordance
with the provisions of 5 U.S.C. 552, will be available for inspection
and copying in the Commission's Public Reference Room. Copies of such
filing also will be available for inspection and copying at the
principal office of Nasdaq. All comments received will be posted
without change; the Commission does not edit personal identifying
information from submissions. You should submit only information that
you wish to make available publicly. All submissions should refer to
File Number SR-NASDAQ-2007-040 and should be submitted on or before May
16, 2007.

    For the Commission, by the Division of Market Regulation,
pursuant to delegated authority.\8\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \8\ 17 CFR 200.30-3(a)(12).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

Florence E. Harmon,
Deputy Secretary.
 [FR Doc. E7-7838 Filed 4-24-07; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 8010-01-P


[Federal Register Volume 88, Number 66 (Thursday, April 6, 2023)]
[Notices]
[Pages 20587-20589]
[FR Doc No: 2023-07140]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

[Release No. 34-97231; File No. SR-NYSEAMER-2023-22]

Self-Regulatory Organizations; NYSE American LLC; Notice of
Filing and Immediate Effectiveness of Proposed Change To Make a
Clarifying Change to the Term Settlement Style Applicable to Flexible
Exchange Options

March 31, 2023.
    Pursuant to Section 19(b)(1) \1\ of the Securities Exchange Act of
1934 (the ``Act''),\2\ and Rule 19b-4 thereunder,\3\ notice is hereby
given that on March 22, 2023, NYSE American LLC (``NYSE American'' or
the ``Exchange'') filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission
(``Commission'') the proposed rule change as described in Items I and
II below, which Items have been prepared by the self-regulatory
organization. The Commission is publishing this notice to solicit
comments on the proposed rule change from interested persons.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \1\ 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(1).
    \2\ 15 U.S.C. 78a.
    \3\ 17 CFR 240.19b-4.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

I. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement of the Terms of Substance
of the Proposed Rule Change

    The Exchange proposes to amend Commentary .01 under Rule 903G to
make a clarifying change to the flex term settlement style applicable
to Flexible Exchange (``FLEX'') Options. The proposed rule change is
available on the Exchange's website at www.nyse.com, at the principal
office of the Exchange, and at the Commission's Public Reference Room.

II. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement of the Purpose of, and
Statutory Basis for, the Proposed Rule Change

    In its filing with the Commission, the self-regulatory organization
included statements concerning the purpose of, and basis for, the
proposed rule change and discussed any comments it received on the
proposed rule change. The text of those statements may be examined at
the places specified in Item IV below. The Exchange has prepared
summaries, set forth in sections A, B, and C below, of the most
significant parts of such statements.

A. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement of the Purpose of, and the
Statutory Basis for, the Proposed Rule Change

1. Purpose
    The Exchange proposes to amend Commentary .01 under Rule 903G to
make a clarifying change to the flex term settlement style applicable
to FLEX Options.
    FLEX Options are customized equity or index contracts that allow
investors to tailor contract terms for exchange-listed equity and index
options. Commentary .01 under Rule 903G currently states that, provided
the options on an underlying security or index are otherwise eligible
for FLEX trading, FLEX Options will be permitted in puts and calls that
do not have the same exercise style, same settlement style, same
expiration date and same exercise price as Non-FLEX Options that are
already available for trading on the same underlying security or
index.\4\ The rule also provides that FLEX Options are permitted before
the options are listed for trading as Non-FLEX Options. Once and if an
option series is listed for trading as a Non-FLEX Option series, (i)
all existing open positions established under the FLEX trading
procedures shall be fully fungible with transactions in the respective
Non-FLEX Options series, and (ii) any further trading in the series
would be as Non-FLEX Options subject to the Non-FLEX trading procedures
and rules, however, in the event a Non-FLEX series is added intra-day,
the holder of a position established under FLEX Trading Procedures
would be permitted to close such position using FLEX trading procedures
against another closing only FLEX position for

the balance of the trading day on which the series is added.\5\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \4\ See Rule 903G, Commentary .01.
    \5\ Id.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    Commentary .01 to Rule 903G is designed to prevent the trading of a
FLEX Option that has the exact same terms (underlying security,
exercise style, settlement style, expiration date and exercise price)
as a non-FLEX Option. In other words, as long as just one term of the
FLEX Option is different from an existing ``regular'' or ``non-FLEX''
option it may be traded as a FLEX Option.
    Under Exchange rules, certain FLEX Equity Options where the
underlying security is an Exchange-Traded Fund are permitted to be
settled by delivery in cash if the underlying security meets prescribed
criteria.\6\ The purpose of this proposed rule change is to amend
Commentary .01 under Rule 903G to clarify that the reference to ``same
settlement style'' in the rule applies to FLEX Index Options and not to
the FLEX ETF Options permitted for listing and trading pursuant to Rule
903G(c)(3)(ii).\7\ As proposed, the first sentence in Commentary .01
under Rule 903G would be modified to state that ``provided the options
on an underlying security or index are otherwise eligible for FLEX
trading, FLEX Options shall be permitted in puts and calls that do not
have the same exercise style, same settlement style (with respect to
FLEX index options only), same expiration date and same exercise price
as Non-FLEX Options that are already available for trading on the same
underlying security or index.'' As a result of this change, for FLEX
ETF Options, at least one of the following terms--exercise style,
expiration date and exercise price--must differ from options in the
non-FLEX market. The Exchange believes the proposed rule change will
add clarity and certainty regarding the flex term settlement style
applicable for FLEX Options listed and traded on the Exchange.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \6\ Rule 903G(c)(3)(ii) provides that the exercise settlement
for a FLEX ETF Option may be by physical delivery of the underlying
security or by delivery in cash if the underlying security, measured
over a six-month period, has an average daily notional value of $500
Million or more and a national average daily volume (ADV) of at
least 4,680,000 shares. See also Securities Exchange Act Release No.
88131 (February 5, 2020), 85 FR 7806 (February 11, 2020) (SR-
NYSEAmerican-2019-38) (Notice of Filing of Amendment No. 1 and Order
Granting Accelerated Approval of a Proposed Rule Change, as Modified
by Amendment No. 1, To Allow Certain Flexible Equity Options To Be
Cash Settled).
    \7\ See Securities Exchange Act Release No. 79125 (October 19,
2016), 81 FR 73452 (October 25, 2016) (SR-NYSEMKT-2016-48) (Adding 2
new settlement styles for FLEX Index Options--Asian and Cliquet--and
adding a reference to settlement style in Commentary .01 under Rule
903G).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

2. Statutory Basis
    The Exchange believes that its proposal is consistent with Section
6(b) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (the ``Act''),\8\ in
general, and furthers the objectives of Section 6(b)(5) of the Act,\9\
in particular, in that it is designed to prevent fraudulent and
manipulative acts and practices, to promote just and equitable
principles of trade, to remove impediments to and perfect the mechanism
of a free and open market and a national market system, and, in
general, to protect investors and the public interest.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \8\ 15 U.S.C. 78f(b).
    \9\ 15 U.S.C. 78f(b)(5).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    The Exchange believes that clarity regarding the flex term
settlement style applicable for FLEX Options will promote fair and
orderly markets by eliminating potential confusion and would allow ATP
Holders and investors with additional opportunities to trade customized
options in an exchange environment.

B. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement on Burden on Competition

    The Exchange does not believe that the proposed rule change will
impose any burden on competition that is not necessary or appropriate
in furtherance of the purposes of the Act. The proposed change is
designed to more clearly describe the current operation of an existing
rule without changing its substance and, therefore, the Exchange
believes that the proposed change will not impose a burden on
competition.

C. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement on Comments on the Proposed
Rule Change Received From Members, Participants, or Others

    No written comments were solicited or received with respect to the
proposed rule change.

III. Date of Effectiveness of the Proposed Rule Change and Timing for
Commission Action

    The Exchange has filed the proposed rule change pursuant to Section
19(b)(3)(A)(iii) of the Act \10\ and Rule 19b-4(f)(6) thereunder.\11\
Because the proposed rule change does not: (i) significantly affect the
protection of investors or the public interest; (ii) impose any
significant burden on competition; and (iii) become operative prior to
30 days from the date on which it was filed, or such shorter time as
the Commission may designate, if consistent with the protection of
investors and the public interest, the proposed rule change has become
effective pursuant to Section 19(b)(3)(A) \12\ of the Act and Rule 19b-
4(f)(6)(iii) thereunder.\13\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \10\ 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(3)(A)(iii).
    \11\ 17 CFR 240.19b-4(f)(6).
    \12\ 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(3)(A)(iii).
    \13\ 17 CFR 240.19b-4(f)(6). In addition, Rule 19b-4(f)(6)(iii)
requires a self-regulatory organization to give the Commission
written notice of its intent to file the proposed rule change, along
with a brief description of the text of the proposed rule change, at
least five business days prior to the date of filing of the proposed
rule change, or such shorter time as designated by the Commission.
The Exchange has satisfied this requirement.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    At any time within 60 days of the filing of such proposed rule
change, the Commission summarily may temporarily suspend such rule
change if it appears to the Commission that such action is necessary or
appropriate in the public interest, for the protection of investors, or
otherwise in furtherance of the purposes of the Act. If the Commission
takes such action, the Commission shall institute proceedings under
Section 19(b)(2)(B) \14\ of the Act to determine whether the proposed
rule change should be approved or disapproved.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \14\ 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(2)(B).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

IV. Solicitation of Comments

    Interested persons are invited to submit written data, views and
arguments concerning the foregoing, including whether the proposed rule
change is consistent with the Act. Comments may be submitted by any of
the following methods:

Electronic Comments

     Use the Commission's internet comment form (http://www.sec.gov/rules/sro.shtml); or
     Send an email to [email protected]. Please include
File Number SR-NYSEAMER-2023-22 on the subject line.

Paper Comments

     Send paper comments in triplicate to Secretary, Securities
and Exchange Commission, 100 F Street NE, Washington, DC 20549-1090.

All submissions should refer to File Number SR-NYSEAMER-2023-22. This
file number should be included on the subject line if email is used. To
help the Commission process and review your comments more efficiently,
please use only one method. The Commission will post all comments on
the Commission's internet website (http://www.sec.gov/rules/sro.shtml).
Copies of the submission, all subsequent amendments, all written
statements with respect to the proposed rule

change that are filed with the Commission, and all written
communications relating to the proposed rule change between the
Commission and any person, other than those that may be withheld from
the public in accordance with the provisions of 5 U.S.C. 552, will be
available for website viewing and printing in the Commission's Public
Reference Room, 100 F Street NE, Washington, DC 20549 on official
business days between the hours of 10:00 a.m. and 3:00 p.m. Copies of
the filing also will be available for inspection and copying at the
principal office of the Exchange.
    All comments received will be posted without change. Persons
submitting comments are cautioned that we do not redact or edit
personal identifying information from comment submissions. You should
submit only information that you wish to make available publicly. All
submissions should refer to File Number SR-NYSEAMER-2023-22 and should
be submitted on or before April 27, 2023.

    For the Commission, by the Division of Trading and Markets,
pursuant to delegated authority.\15\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \15\ 17 CFR 200.30-3(a)(12).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

Sherry R. Haywood,
Assistant Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2023-07140 Filed 4-5-23; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 8011-01-P


Chlorpyrifos Data Transparency Discussion with the Columbia Center for Children's Environmental Health
Mothers and Newborns Study
June 27, 2018; 3:00 PM EDT
Teleconference

Participants
Columbia Center for Children's Environmental Health (CCCEH)
Howard Andrews, Ann-Louise Oats, Millie Tung
EPA/Office of Pesticide Programs (OPP)
Immediate Office: Richard Keigwin, Anna Lowit, Michelle Arling
Health Effects Division (HED):  Dana Vogel, David Miller, Mike Metzger, James Nguyen
Pesticide Re-Evaluation Division (PRD):  Kevin Costello, Dana Friedman, Yu-Ting Guilaran, Nicole Zinn

Meeting Summary
EPA held a teleconference with Columbia to discuss access to the raw data from the CCCEH epidemiology study.  Columbia reiterated their concerns about identification of study participants.  EPA noted it shares Columbia's interest in protecting subject privacy. EPA and Columbia agreed to future follow-up on this topic.


[Federal Register: December 16, 2008 (Volume 73, Number 242)]
[Notices]
[Page 76431-76432]
[DOCID:fr16de08-99]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

[Release No. 34-59076; File No. SR-FINRA-2008-053]

Self-Regulatory Organizations; Financial Industry Regulatory
Authority, Inc.; Order Approving a Proposed Rule Change To Amend
Section 4(c) of Schedule A of the FINRA By-Laws To Increase Certain
Qualification Examination Fees

December 10, 2008.

I. Introduction

    On October 15, 2008, the Financial Industry Regulatory Authority,
Inc. (``FINRA'') (f/k/a National Association of Securities Dealers,
Inc. (``NASD'')), filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission
(``Commission''), pursuant to Section 19(b)(1) of the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934 (``Act'') \1\ and Rule 19b-4 thereunder,\2\ a
proposed rule change to amend Section 4(c) of Schedule A of the FINRA
By-Laws (``Schedule A'') to increase certain qualification examination
fees. The proposed rule change was published for comment in the Federal
Register on October 29, 2008.\3\ The Commission received one comment
letter on the proposed rule change.\4\ This order approves the proposed
rule change.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \1\ 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(1).
    \2\ 17 CFR 240.19b-4.
    \3\ See Securities Exchange Act Release No. 58832 (October 22,
2008); 73 FR 64374 (``Notice'').
    \4\ See Letter to Florence E. Harmon, Acting Secretary,
Commission, from Dennis P. Beirne, Vice President and Chief
Compliance Officer, People's Securities, Inc., dated November 12,
2008 (``People's Securities Letter'').
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

II. Description

    Any person associated with a member firm who is engaged in the
securities business of the firm must register with FINRA. As part of
the registration process, securities professionals must pass a
qualification examination to demonstrate competence in each area in
which they intend to work. These mandatory qualification examinations
cover a broad range of subjects on the markets, products, a person's
responsibilities in a given position, securities industry rules and the
regulatory structure. The proposed rule change amends Schedule A to
increase certain qualification examination fees.\5\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \5\ Schedule A sets forth examination fees for those
examinations that are sponsored or co-sponsored by FINRA and/or that
may be required by FINRA for its members.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

III. Comment Letter

    The Commission received one comment letter in response to the
proposed rule change.\6\ People's Securities, Inc. (``People's
Securities'') submitted a comment letter in opposition to the proposal,
arguing that FINRA's decision to increase examination fees comes at a
time when many firms are suffering from a reduction in business and
have resorted to measures such as reducing the number of new hires and
current staff in order to decrease expenditures. People's Securities
states that an increase in examination fees would result in a
``significant burden'' on firms, and for People's Securities in
particular, as many of the proposed fee increases are for the
examinations that People's Securities uses the most. People's
Securities suggests that if FINRA increases these fees, these changes
will result in fewer registered representatives which will
detrimentally affect the ability of firms to service the needs of
investors.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \6\ Supra note 4.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    In its response to the People's Securities Letter,\7\ FINRA
acknowledged People's Securities' economic arguments but explained that
FINRA has experienced a rise in its own costs of developing,
administering, and delivering the exams, and consequently had to raise
examination fees. In support of its decision, FINRA stated that it had
not raised any examination fees since 2006, and that it had conducted a
test based on a sample of its regulated firms and concluded that its
proposed fee changes would increase a firm's overall examination fees
on average by less than 10% each year.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \7\ See Letter to Florence E. Harmon, Acting Secretary,
Commission, from Erika L. Lazar, Senior Attorney, FINRA, dated
November 26, 2008 (``FINRA Letter'').
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

IV. Discussion and Commission's Findings

    After careful review, the Commission finds that the proposed rule
change is consistent with the requirements of the Act and the rules and
regulations thereunder applicable to a national securities
association.\8\ In particular, the Commission finds that the proposed
rule change is consistent with Section 15A(b)(5) of the Act,\9\ which
requires, among other things, that FINRA rules provide for the
equitable allocation of reasonable dues, fees and other charges among
members and issuers and other persons using any facility or system that
FINRA operates or controls. The filing increases certain qualification
examination fees to reflect FINRA's increased costs in developing,
administering and delivering qualification examinations. While the
Commission recognizes the issues raised by People's Securities, FINRA
has represented that an increase in fees is necessary to account for
increases in its own costs to manage its qualification examinations,
many of which are utilized throughout the securities industry and are
used to ensure that registered persons new to the securities industry
have the basic knowledge to enable them to do their jobs and comply
with industry rules and regulations. The Commission notes FINRA's
representation that it will continue to maintain an examination fee
structure at a reasonable cost in light of the current economic
culture.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \8\ In approving this proposal, the Commission has considered
the proposed rule's impact on efficiency, competition, and capital
formation. See 15 U.S.C. 78c(f).
    \9\ 15 U.S.C. 78o-3(b)(5).

---------------------------------------------------------------------------

V. Conclusion

    It is therefore ordered, pursuant to Section 19(b)(2) of the
Act,\10\ that the proposed rule change (SR-FINRA-2008-053) be, and
hereby is, approved.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \10\ 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(2).

    For the Commission, by the Division of Trading and Markets,
pursuant to delegated authority.\11\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \11\ 17 CFR 200.30-3(a)(12).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

Florence E. Harmon,
Acting Secretary.
[FR Doc. E8-29702 Filed 12-15-08; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 8011-01-P


[Federal Register Volume 79, Number 210 (Thursday, October 30, 2014)]
[Notices]
[Page 64640]
[FR Doc No: 2014-25782]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

[Release No. 34-73426; File No. SR-ODD-2014-01]

Canadian Derivatives Clearing Corporation; Order Approving
Accelerated Distribution of an Amended Options Disclosure Document

October 24, 2014.
    On October 3, 2014, the Canadian Derivatives Clearing Corporation
(``CDCC''), on behalf of the Bourse de Montr[eacute]al, Inc. (``Bourse
de Montr[eacute]al''), submitted to the Securities and Exchange
Commission (``Commission''), pursuant to Rule 9b-1 under the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934 (``Act''),\1\ five definitive copies of an amended
options disclosure document (``ODD'') that describes the risks and
characteristics of options traded on the Bourse de Montr[eacute]al.\2\
The CDCC has revised the ODD to, among other things, modify certain
expiration dates of options and clarify that bond options do not
currently trade on the Bourse de Montr[eacute]al.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \1\ 17 CFR 240.9b-1.
    \2\ The Commission initially reviewed the ODD in 1984. See
Securities Exchange Act Release No. 21365 (October 2, 1984), 49 FR
39400 (October 5, 1984) (File No. SR-ODD-84-1). Since then, the
Commission has reviewed several amendments to the ODD. See, e.g.,
Securities Exchange Act Release Nos. 51124 (February 2, 2005), 70 FR
6740 (February 8, 2005) (File No. SR-ODD-2004-03) (amending the ODD
to reflect, among other things, the name change from the S&P/TSE 60
Index to the S&P/TSX 60 Index and to add an Annex to the ODD setting
forth the holidays and early closings of the Bourse de
Montr[eacute]al,); 44333 (May 21, 2001), 66 FR 29193 (May 29, 2001)
(File No. SR-ODD-00-04) (amending the ODD to reflect, among other
things, changes to the structure of the Canadian equity markets and
to provide a discussion of Enhanced Capital Marketing); 37569
(August 14, 1996), 61 FR 43281 (August 21, 1996) (File No. SR-ODD-
96-01) (amending the ODD to reflect, among other things, the name
change from TCO to CDCC); 29033 (April 1, 1991), 56 FR 14407 (April
9, 1991) (File No. SR-ODD-91-1) (amending the ODD to include, among
other things, references to Toronto Stock Exchange 35 Composite
Index options); 24480 (May 19, 1987), 52 FR 20179 (May 29, 1987)
(File No. SR-ODD-87-2) (amending the ODD to include, among other
things, a discussion of Government of Canada Treasury Bill Price
Index options); 22349 (August 21, 1985), 50 FR 34956 (August 28,
1985) (File No. SR-ODD-85-1) (amending the ODD to include, among
other things, a discussion of the risks and uses of stock index and
bond options); 51124 (February 1, 2005), 70 FR 6740 (February 8,
2005) (File No. SR-ODD-2004-03) (amending the ODD to include, among
other things, the CDCC's new automatic exercise parameters for
equity and bond options); 58172 (July 16, 2008), 73 FR 42840 (July
23, 2008) (File No. SR-ODD-2008-03) (amending the ODD to include,
among other things, the CDCC's current automatic exercise parameters
for equity and bond options and to add an update to the discussion
of the treatment of adjustments in the terms of equity options with
respect to stock splits, stock dividends or other stock
distributions); and 63125 (October 18, 2010) 75 FR 65537 (October
25, 2010) (File No. SR-ODD-2010-02) (amending the ODD to, among
other things, update the discussion of Canadian federal income tax
considerations applicable to non-residents).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    Rule 9b-1 under the Act provides that an options market must file
five preliminary copies of an amended ODD with the Commission at least
30 days prior to the date when definitive copies of the amended ODD are
furnished to customers, unless the Commission determines otherwise,
having due regard to the adequacy of the information disclosed and the
public interest and protection of investors.\3\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \3\ This provision is intended to permit the Commission either
to accelerate or extend the time period in which definitive copies
of a disclosure document may be distributed to the public.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    The Commission has reviewed the amended ODD and finds, having due
regard to the adequacy of the information disclosed, that it is
consistent with the protection of investors and in the public interest
to allow the distribution of the amended ODD as of the date of this
order.\4\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \4\ Rule 9b-1 under the Act provides that the use of an ODD
shall not be permitted unless the options class to which the
document relates is the subject of an effective registration
statement on Form S-20 under the Securities Act of 1933 or is exempt
from such registration. On April 5, 2010, the Commission declared
effective the CDCC's most recent Post-Effective Amendment to its
Form S-20 registration statement. See File No. 002-69458.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    It is therefore ordered, pursuant to Rule 9b-1 under the Act,\5\
that the distribution of the revised ODD (SR-ODD-2014-01) as of the
date of this is order, is approved.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \5\ 17 CFR 240.9b-1.

    For the Commission, by the Division of Trading and Markets,
pursuant to delegated authority.\6\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \6\ 17 CFR 200.30-3(a)(39)(i).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

Kevin M. O'Neill,
Deputy Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2014-25782 Filed 10-29-14; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 8011-01-P


[Federal Register Volume 86, Number 207 (Friday, October 29, 2021)]
[Notices]
[Pages 60027-60028]
[FR Doc No: 2021-23621]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission

Combined Notice of Filings #1

    Take notice that the Commission received the following electric
corporate filings:
    Docket Numbers: EC22-8-000.
    Applicants: Gibson City Energy Center, LLC, Shelby County Energy
Center, LLC, Southern Illinois Generation Company, LLC, Tilton Energy
LLC.
    Description: Application for Authorization Under Section 203 of the
Federal Power Act of Gibson City Energy Center, LLC, et al. and request
for Expedited Action by December 23, 2021.
    Filed Date: 10/22/21.
    Accession Number: 20211022-5192.
    Comment Date: 5 p.m. ET 11/12/21.

    Docket Numbers: EC22-9-000.
    Applicants: Borderlands Wind, LLC, Cool Springs Solar, LLC, Dodge
Flat Solar, LLC, Elora Solar, LLC, Ensign Wind Energy, LLC, Fish
Springs Ranch Solar, LLC, Irish Creek Wind, LLC, Minco Wind Energy III,
LLC, Minco IV & V Interconnection, LLC, Quinebaug Solar, LLC, Quitman
II Solar, LLC, NEP US SellCo II, LLC, NextEra Energy Partners
Acquisitions, LLC.
    Description: Application for Authorization Under Section 203 of the
Federal Power Act of Borderlands Wind, LLC, et al.
    Filed Date: 10/22/21.
    Accession Number: 20211022-5196.
    Comment Date: 5 p.m. ET 11/12/21.

    Take notice that the Commission received the following electric
rate filings:

    Docket Numbers: ER10-3297-016.
    Applicants: Powerex Corporation.
    Description: Notice of Non-Material Change in Status of Powerex
Corp.
    Filed Date: 10/22/21.
    Accession Number: 20211022-5202.
    Comment Date: 5 p.m. ET 11/12/21.

    Docket Numbers: ER20-116-000; ER20-67-000; ER20-113-000.
    Applicants: Evergy Missouri West, Inc., Evergy Kansas Central,
Inc., Evergy Metro, Inc.
    Description: Response to September 22, 2021 Deficiency Letter of
Evergy Kansas Central, Inc., et al.
    Filed Date: 10/22/21.
    Accession Number: 20211022-5203.
    Comment Date: 5 p.m. ET 11/12/21.

    Docket Numbers: ER21-2562-001.
    Applicants: Southwest Power Pool, Inc.
    Description: Tariff Amendment: Deficiency Response in ER21-2562--
Revisions to DISIS Process to be effective 10/1/2021.
    Filed Date: 10/25/21.
    Accession Number: 20211025-5036.
    Comment Date: 5 p.m. ET 11/15/21.

    Docket Numbers: ER22-193-000.
    Applicants: Southwest Power Pool, Inc.
    Description: Sec.  205(d) Rate Filing: 3866 City of Garden City KS
& Sunflower Interconnection Agreement to be effective 12/31/9998.
    Filed Date: 10/22/21.
    Accession Number: 20211022-5184.
    Comment Date: 5 p.m. ET 11/12/21.

    Docket Numbers: ER22-194-000.
    Applicants: Tri-State Generation and Transmission Association, Inc.
    Description: Sec.  205(d) Rate Filing: Initial Filing of Rate
Schedule No. 336 to be effective 10/26/2021.
    Filed Date: 10/25/21.
    Accession Number: 20211025-5050.
    Comment Date: 5 p.m. ET 11/15/21.

    Docket Numbers: ER22-195-000.
    Applicants: Tri-State Generation and Transmission Association, Inc.
    Description: Sec.  205(d) Rate Filing: Amendment to Service
Agreement No. 894 to be effective 10/21/2021.
    Filed Date: 10/25/21.
    Accession Number: 20211025-5055.
    Comment Date: 5 p.m. ET 11/15/21.

    Docket Numbers: ER22-196-000.
    Applicants: Portland General Electric Company.
    Description: Sec.  205(d) Rate Filing: Att K Revision Filing to be
effective 1/1/2022.
    Filed Date: 10/25/21.
    Accession Number: 20211025-5056.
    Comment Date: 5 p.m. ET 11/15/21.

    Docket Numbers: ER22-197-000.
    Applicants: Basin Electric Power Cooperative.
    Description: Tariff Amendment: Basin Electric Notice of
Cancellation of Service Agreements 3, 8, 10, 11, & 12 to be effective
12/25/2021.
    Filed Date: 10/25/21.
    Accession Number: 20211025-5057.
    Comment Date: 5 p.m. ET 11/15/21.

    Docket Numbers: ER22-198-000.
    Applicants: Consolidated Edison Company of New York, Inc., New York
Independent System Operator, Inc.
    Description: Sec.  205(d) Rate Filing: Consolidated Edison Company
of New York, Inc. submits tariff filing per 35.13(a)(2)(iii: Joint 205:
LGIA among NYISO, Con Edison, NRG. 2nd Amended Restated SA2535 to be
effective 10/8/2021.
    Filed Date: 10/25/21.
    Accession Number: 20211025-5075.
    Comment Date: 5 p.m. ET 11/15/21.

    Docket Numbers: ER22-199-000.
    Applicants: Midcontinent Independent System Operator, Inc.
    Description: Sec.  205(d) Rate Filing: 2021-10-25_SA 3528 UE-Evergy
MO 1st Rev IA Certificate of Concurrence to be effective 12/21/2021.
    Filed Date: 10/25/21.
    Accession Number: 20211025-5082.
    Comment Date: 5 p.m. ET 11/15/21.

    Docket Numbers: ER22-202-000.
    Applicants: PJM Interconnection, L.L.C.
    Description: Sec.  205(d) Rate Filing: Original ISA, Service
Agreement No. 6206; Queue No. AE1-196 to be effective 9/23/2021.
    Filed Date: 10/25/21.
    Accession Number: 20211025-5100.
    Comment Date: 5 p.m. ET 11/15/21.

    Take notice that the Commission received the following electric
securities filings:

    Docket Numbers: ES22-15-000.
    Applicants: Kingsport Power Company.
    Description: Application Under Section 204 of the Federal Power Act
for Authorization to Issue Securities of Kingsport Power Company.
    Filed Date: 10/22/21.
    Accession Number: 20211022-5190.
    Comment Date: 5 p.m. ET 11/12/21.

    Docket Numbers: ES22-16-000.
    Applicants: AEP Texas Inc.
    Description: Application Under Section 204 of the Federal Power Act
for Authorization to Issue Securities of AEP Texas Inc.
    Filed Date: 10/22/21.
    Accession Number: 20211022-5191.
    Comment Date: 5 p.m. ET 11/12/21.

    The filings are accessible in the Commission's eLibrary system
(https://elibrary.ferc.gov/idmws/search/fercgensearch.asp) by querying
the docket number.
    Any person desiring to intervene or protest in any of the above
proceedings must file in accordance with Rules 211 and 214 of the
Commission's Regulations (18 CFR 385.211 and 385.214) on or before 5:00
p.m. Eastern time on the specified comment date. Protests may be
considered, but intervention is necessary to become a party to the
proceeding.
    eFiling is encouraged. More detailed information relating to filing
requirements, interventions, protests, service, and qualifying
facilities filings can be found at:http://www.ferc.gov/

docs-filing/efiling/filing-req.pdf. For other information, call (866)
208-3676 (toll free). For TTY, call<PHONE_NUMBER>.

    Dated: October 25, 2021.
Debbie-Anne A. Reese,
Deputy Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2021-23621 Filed 10-28-21; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6717-01-P


[Federal Register: November 15, 2005 (Volume 70, Number 219)]
[Notices]
[Page 69325]
[DOCID:fr15no05-33]

=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission

[Docket No. RP06-83-000]

Cheyenne Plains Gas Pipeline Company, L.L.C.; Notice of Tariff
Filing

November 8, 2005.
    Take notice that on November 1, 2005, Cheyenne Plains Gas Pipeline
Company, LLC (Cheyenne Plains) tendered for filing as part of its FERC
Gas Tariff, Original Volume No. 1, First Revised Sheet No. 109, with an
effective date of December 1, 2005.
    Cheyenne Plains states that the tariff sheet implements the pro
forma sheet previously approved in this proceeding which expands the
definition of ``Initial Shipper.''
    Cheyenne Plains states that copies of its filing have been sent to
all parties of record in this proceeding and affected state
commissions.
    Any person desiring to intervene or to protest this filing must
file in accordance with Rules 211 and 214 of the Commission's Rules of
Practice and Procedure (18 CFR 385.211 and 385.214). Protests will be
considered by the Commission in determining the appropriate action to
be taken, but will not serve to make protestants parties to the
proceeding. Any person wishing to become a party must file a notice of
intervention or motion to intervene, as appropriate. Such notices,
motions, or protests must be filed in accordance with the provisions of
Section 154.210 of the Commission's regulations (18 CFR 154.210).
Anyone filing an intervention or protest must serve a copy of that
document on the Applicant. Anyone filing an intervention or protest on
or before the intervention or protest date need not serve motions to
intervene or protests on persons other than the Applicant.
    The Commission encourages electronic submission of protests and
interventions in lieu of paper using the ``eFiling'' link at http://www.ferc.gov.
 Persons unable to file electronically should submit an

original and 14 copies of the protest or intervention to the Federal
Energy Regulatory Commission, 888 First Street, NE., Washington, DC
20426.
    This filing is accessible on-line at http://www.ferc.gov, using the

``eLibrary'' link and is available for review in the Commission's
Public Reference Room in Washington, DC. There is an ``eSubscription''
link on the Web site that enables subscribers to receive e-mail
notification when a document is added to a subscribed docket(s). For
assistance with any FERC Online service, please e-mail
<EMAIL_ADDRESS>or call<PHONE_NUMBER> (toll free). For

TTY, call<PHONE_NUMBER>.

Magalie R. Salas,
Secretary.
 [FR Doc. E5-6291 Filed 11-14-05; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 6717-01-P


[Federal Register Volume 75, Number 236 (Thursday, December 9, 2010)]
[Notices]
[Pages 76714-76716]
[FR Doc No: 2010-30940]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission

Combined Notice of Filings No. 2

December 1, 2010.
    Take notice that the Commission received the following electric
rate filings:
    Docket Numbers: ER11-2250-000.
    Applicants: PPL University Park, LLC.
    Description: PPL University Park, LLC submits tariff filing per 35:
PPL University Park, LLC's Notice of Change in Status Market-Based Rate
Filing to be effective 11/1/2010.
    Filed Date: 12/01/2010.
    Accession Number: 20101201-5147.
    Comment Date: 5 p.m. Eastern Time on Wednesday, December 22, 2010.

    Docket Numbers: ER11-2251-000.
    Applicants: PPL Wallingford Energy LLC.
    Description: PPL Wallingford Energy LLC submits tariff filing per
35: PPL Wallingford Energy, LLC's Notice of Change in Status MBR Filing
to be effective 11/1/2010.
    Filed Date: 12/01/2010.
    Accession Number: 20101201-5150.
    Comment Date: 5 p.m. Eastern Time on Wednesday, December 22, 2010.

    Docket Numbers: ER11-2252-000.
    Applicants: EDFD-West Valley.
    Description: EDFD-West Valley submits tariff filing per 35.15: West
Valley Cancellation Filing to be effective 12/2/2010.
    Filed Date: 12/01/2010.
    Accession Number: 20101201-5179.
    Comment Date: 5 p.m. Eastern Time on Wednesday, December 22, 2010.

    Docket Numbers: ER11-2253-000.
    Applicants: EDF Inc.
    Description: EDF Inc. submits tariff filing per 35.15: EDF Tariff
Cancellation Filing to be effective 12/2/2010.
    Filed Date: 12/01/2010.
    Accession Number: 20101201-5182.
    Comment Date: 5 p.m. Eastern Time on Wednesday, December 22, 2010.

    Docket Numbers: ER11-2254-000.
    Applicants: BE Alabama LLC.
    Description: BE Alabama LLC submits tariff filing per 35: Order 697
Compliance Filing to be effective 12/1/2010.
    Filed Date: 12/01/2010.
    Accession Number: 20101201-5183.
    Comment Date: 5 p.m. Eastern Time on Wednesday, December 22, 2010.

    Docket Numbers: ER11-2255-000.
    Applicants: BE Allegheny LLC.
    Description: BE Allegheny LLC submits tariff filing per 35: Order
697 Compliance Filing to be effective 12/1/2010.
    Filed Date: 12/01/2010.
    Accession Number: 20101201-5184.
    Comment Date: 5 p.m. Eastern Time on Wednesday, December 22, 2010.

    Docket Numbers: ER11-2256-000.
    Applicants: California Independent System Operator Corporation.
    Description: California Independent System Operator Corporation
submits tariff filing per 35.13(a)(2)(iii): 2010-12-01 CAISO's Capacity
Procurement Mechanism Amendment to be effective 4/1/2011.
    Filed Date: 12/01/2010.
    Accession Number: 20101201-5185.
    Comment Date: 5 p.m. Eastern Time on Wednesday, December 22, 2010.

    Docket Numbers: ER11-2257-000.
    Applicants: BE Ironwood LLC.
    Description: BE Ironwood LLC submits tariff filing per 35: Order
697 Compliance Filing to be effective 12/1/2010.
    Filed Date: 12/01/2010.
    Accession Number: 20101201-5186.
    Comment Date: 5 p.m. Eastern Time on Wednesday, December 22, 2010.

    Docket Numbers: ER11-2258-000.
    Applicants: EDFD-Handsome Lake.
    Description: EDFD-Handsome Lake submits tariff filing per 35.15:
EDFD-Handsome Lake Tariff Cancellation Filing to be effective 12/2/
2010.
    Filed Date: 12/01/2010.
    Accession Number: 20101201-5187.
    Comment Date: 5 p.m. Eastern Time on Wednesday, December 22, 2010.

    Docket Numbers: ER11-2259-000.
    Applicants: BE CA LLC.
    Description: BE CA LLC submits tariff filing per 35: Order 697
Compliance Filing to be effective 12/1/2010.
    Filed Date: 12/01/2010.
    Accession Number: 20101201-5188.
    Comment Date: 5 p.m. Eastern Time on Wednesday, December 22, 2010.

    Docket Numbers: ER11-2260-000.
    Applicants: BE KJ LLC.
    Description: BE KJ LLC submits tariff filing per 35: Order 697
Compliance Filing to be effective 12/1/2010.
    Filed Date: 12/01/2010.
    Accession Number: 20101201-5189.
    Comment Date: 5 p.m. Eastern Time on Wednesday, December 22, 2010.

    Docket Numbers: ER11-2261-000.
    Applicants: BE Louisiana LLC.
    Description: BE Louisiana LLC submits tariff filing per 35: Order
697 Compliance Filing to be effective 12/1/2010.
    Filed Date: 12/01/2010.
    Accession Number: 20101201-5190.
    Comment Date: 5 p.m. Eastern Time on Wednesday, December 22, 2010.

    Docket Numbers: ER11-2262-000.
    Applicants: BE Rayle LLC.
    Description: BE Rayle LLC submits tariff filing per 35: Order 697
Compliance Filing to be effective 12/1/2010.
    Filed Date: 12/01/2010.
    Accession Number: 20101201-5191.
    Comment Date: 5 p.m. Eastern Time on Wednesday, December 22, 2010.

    Docket Numbers: ER11-2263-000.
    Applicants: Cedar Brakes I, L.L.C.
    Description: Cedar Brakes I, L.L.C. submits tariff filing per 35:
Order 697 Compliance Filing to be effective 12/1/2010.
    Filed Date: 12/01/2010.
    Accession Number: 20101201-5192.
    Comment Date: 5 p.m. Eastern Time on Wednesday, December 22, 2010.

    Docket Numbers: ER11-2264-000.
    Applicants: Cedar Brakes II, L.L.C.
    Description: Cedar Brakes II, L.L.C. submits tariff filing per 35:
Order 697 Compliance Filing to be effective 12/1/2010.
    Filed Date: 12/01/2010.
    Accession Number: 20101201-5193.
    Comment Date: 5 p.m. Eastern Time on Wednesday, December 22, 2010.

    Docket Numbers: ER11-2265-000.
    Applicants: Brush Cogeneration Partners.
    Description: Brush Cogeneration Partners submits tariff filing per

35.13(a)(2)(iii): Brush Cogeneration ETariff Amend to be effective 12/
30/2010.
    Filed Date: 12/01/2010.
    Accession Number: 20101201-5194.
    Comment Date: 5 p.m. Eastern Time on Wednesday, December 22, 2010.

    Docket Numbers: ER11-2266-000.
    Applicants: Keystone Generation, LLC.
    Description: Keystone Generation, LLC submits tariff filing per
35.15: Keystone Tariff Cancellation Filing to be effective 12/2/2010.
    Filed Date: 12/01/2010.
    Accession Number: 20101201-5195.
    Comment Date: 5 p.m. Eastern Time on Wednesday, December 22, 2010.

    Docket Numbers: ER11-2267-000.
    Applicants: Central Power & Lime LLC.
    Description: Central Power & Lime LLC submits tariff filing per 35:
Order 697 Compliance Filing to be effective 12/1/2010.
    Filed Date: 12/01/2010.
    Accession Number: 20101201-5196.
    Comment Date: 5 p.m. Eastern Time on Wednesday, December 22, 2010.

    Docket Numbers: ER11-2268-000.
    Applicants: Vineland Energy LLC.
    Description: Vineland Energy LLC submits tariff filing per 35:
Order 697 Compliance Filing to be effective 12/1/2010.
    Filed Date: 12/01/2010.
    Accession Number: 20101201-5198.
    Comment Date: 5 p.m. Eastern Time on Wednesday, December 22, 2010.

    Docket Numbers: ER11-2269-000.
    Applicants: Utility Contract Funding, L.L.C.
    Description: Utility Contract Funding, L.L.C. submits tariff filing
per 35: Order 697 Compliance Filing to be effective 12/1/2010.
    Filed Date: 12/01/2010.
    Accession Number: 20101201-5199.
    Comment Date: 5 p.m. Eastern Time on Wednesday, December 22, 2010.

    Docket Numbers: ER11-2270-000.
    Applicants: J.P. Morgan Commodities Canada Corporation.
    Description: J.P. Morgan Commodities Canada Corporation submits
tariff filing per 35: Order 697 Compliance Filing to be effective 12/1/
2010.
    Filed Date: 12/01/2010.
    Accession Number: 20101201-5201.
    Comment Date: 5 p.m. Eastern Time on Wednesday, December 22, 2010.

    Docket Numbers: ER11-2271-000.
    Applicants: Conemaugh Generation, LLC.
    Description: Conemaugh Generation, LLC submits tariff filing per
35.15: Conemaugh Tariff Cancellation Filing to be effective 12/2/2010.
    Filed Date: 12/01/2010.
    Accession Number: 20101201-5202.
    Comment Date: 5 p.m. Eastern Time on Wednesday, December 22, 2010.

    Docket Numbers: ER11-2272-000.
    Applicants: J.P. Morgan Ventures Energy Corporation.
    Description: J.P. Morgan Ventures Energy Corporation submits tariff
filing per 35: Order 697 Compliance Filing to be effective 12/1/2010.
    Filed Date: 12/01/2010.
    Accession Number: 20101201-5203.
    Comment Date: 5 p.m. Eastern Time on Wednesday, December 22, 2010.

    Docket Numbers: ER11-2273-000.
    Applicants: South Carolina Electric & Gas Transmission.
    Description: South Carolina Electric & Gas Transmission submits
tariff filing per 35.13(a)(2)(iii): Rate Schedule Change Other Than
Rate Increases to be effective 12/1/2010.
    Filed Date: 12/01/2010.
    Accession Number: 20101201-5204.
    Comment Date: 5 p.m. Eastern Time on Wednesday, December 22, 2010.

    Docket Numbers: ER11-2274-000.
    Applicants: C.P. Crane Power, LLC.
    Description: C.P. Crane Power, LLC submits tariff filing per 35.15:
CP Crane Cancellation Filing to be effective 12/2/2010.
    Filed Date: 12/01/2010.
    Accession Number: 20101201-5206.
    Comment Date: 5 p.m. Eastern Time on Wednesday, December 22, 2010.

    Docket Numbers: ER11-2275-000.
    Applicants: Midwest Independent System Transmission Operator, Inc.
    Description: Report of Midwest Independent System Transmission
Operator, Inc.
    Filed Date: 12/01/2010.
    Accession Number: 20101201-5276.
    Comment Date: 5 p.m. Eastern Time on Wednesday, December 22, 2010.

    Docket Numbers: ER11-2276-000.
    Applicants: Midwest Independent Transmission System Operator, Inc.
    Description: Midwest Independent Transmission System Operator, Inc.
submits tariff filing per 35.13(a)(2)(i): DEI-DEI WDS x 6 to be
effective 12/1/2010.
    Filed Date: 12/02/2010.
    Accession Number: 20101202-5029.
    Comment Date: 5 p.m. Eastern Time on Thursday, December 23, 2010.

    Docket Numbers: ER11-2277-000.
    Applicants: Midwest Independent Transmission System Operator, Inc.
    Description: Midwest Independent Transmission System Operator, Inc.
submits the ITC Midwest Joint Pricing Zone Revenue Allocation
Agreement, to be effective 12/3/2010.
    Filed Date: 12/02/2010.
    Accession Number: 20101202-5040.
    Comment Date: 5 p.m. Eastern Time on Thursday, December 23, 2010.

    Docket Numbers: ER11-2278-000.
    Applicants: Duke Energy Indiana, Inc.
    Description: Duke Energy Indiana, Inc. Notice of Cancellation.
    Filed Date: 12/01/2010.
    Accession Number: 20101201-5277.
    Comment Date: 5 p.m. Eastern Time on Wednesday, December 22, 2010.

    Docket Numbers: ER11-2279-000.
    Applicants: Wabash Valley Power Association, Inc.
    Description: Wabash Valley Power Association, Inc. submits tariff
filing per 35: WVPA Baseline--FERC Electric Tariff Vol No. 1-Section
2--Service Agreements to be effective 12/2/2010.
    Filed Date: 12/02/2010.
    Accession Number: 20101202-5051.
    Comment Date: 5 p.m. Eastern Time on Thursday, December 23, 2010.

    Take notice that the Commission received the following public
utility holding company filings:
    Docket Numbers: PH11-3-000.
    Applicants: PPL Corporation.
    Description: Notification of Material Change in Facts of PPL
Corporation.
    Filed Date: 12/01/2010.
    Accession Number: 20101201-5231.
    Comment Date: 5 p.m. Eastern Time on Wednesday, December 22, 2010.

    Docket Numbers: PH11-4-000.
    Applicants: The GE Companies.
    Description: Revised Form FERC-65A of The GE Companies.
    Filed Date: 12/01/2010.
    Accession Number: 20101201-5270.
    Comment Date: 5 p.m. Eastern Time on Wednesday, December 22, 2010.

    Take notice that the Commission received the following electric
reliability filings:
    Docket Numbers: RR08-4-006.
    Applicants: North American Electric Reliability Corporation.
    Description: Compliance Filing of the North American Electric
Reliability Corporation in Response to the Order on Violation Severity
Levels Proposed by the Electric Reliability Organization.
    Filed Date: 12/01/2010.
    Accession Number: 20101201-5245.
    Comment Date: 5 p.m. Eastern Time on Wednesday, December 22, 2010.

    Any person desiring to intervene or to protest in any of the above
proceedings must file in accordance with Rules 211 and 214 of the
Commission's Rules of Practice and Procedure (18 CFR 385.211 and
385.214) on or before 5 p.m. Eastern time on the specified comment
date. It is not necessary to separately intervene again in a subdocket
related to a

compliance filing if you have previously intervened in the same docket.
Protests will be considered by the Commission in determining the
appropriate action to be taken, but will not serve to make protestants
parties to the proceeding. Anyone filing a motion to intervene or
protest must serve a copy of that document on the Applicant. In
reference to filings initiating a new proceeding, interventions or
protests submitted on or before the comment deadline need not be served
on persons other than the Applicant.
    The Commission encourages electronic submission of protests and
interventions in lieu of paper, using the FERC Online links at http://www.ferc.gov. To facilitate electronic service, persons with Internet
access who will eFile a document and/or be listed as a contact for an
intervenor must create and validate an eRegistration account using the
eRegistration link. Select the eFiling link to log on and submit the
intervention or protests.
    Persons unable to file electronically should submit an original and
14 copies of the intervention or protest to the Federal Energy
Regulatory Commission, 888 First St. NE., Washington, DC 20426.
    The filings in the above proceedings are accessible in the
Commission's eLibrary system by clicking on the appropriate link in the
above list. They are also available for review in the Commission's
Public Reference Room in Washington, DC. There is an eSubscription link
on the Web site that enables subscribers to receive e-mail notification
when a document is added to a subscribed dockets(s). For assistance
with any FERC Online service, please e-mail<EMAIL_ADDRESS>
or call<PHONE_NUMBER> (toll free). For TTY, call<PHONE_NUMBER>.

Nathaniel J. Davis, Sr.,
Deputy Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2010-30940 Filed 12-8-10; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6717-01-P