[Federal Register: October 6, 2010 (Volume 75, Number 193)]
[Notices]
[Page 61724-61726]
[DOCID:fr06oc10-62]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission

Combined Notice of Filings 2

September 22, 2010.
    Take notice that the Commission received the following electric
rate filings:

    Docket Numbers: ER10-2823-000.
    Applicants: Barton Windpower LLC.
    Description: Barton Windpower LLC submits tariff filing per 35.12:
Baseline Filing of Market-Based Rate Tariff to be effective 9/22/2010.
    Filed Date: 09/22/2010.
    Accession Number: 20100922-5059.
    Comment Date: 5 p.m. Eastern Time on Wednesday, October 13, 2010.

    Docket Numbers: ER10-2824-000.
    Applicants: Big Horn Wind Project LLC.
    Description: Big Horn Wind Project LLC submits tariff filing per
35.12: Baseline Filing of Market-Based Rate Tariff to be effective 9/
22/2010.
    Filed Date: 09/22/2010.
    Accession Number: 20100922-5060.
    Comment Date: 5 p.m. Eastern Time on Wednesday, October 13, 2010.

    Docket Numbers: ER10-2825-000.
    Applicants: Big Horn II Wind Project LLC.
    Description: Big Horn II Wind Project LLC submits tariff filing per
35.12: Baseline Filing of Market-Based Rate Tariff to be effective 9/
22/2010.
    Filed Date: 09/22/2010.
    Accession Number: 20100922-5061.
    Comment Date: 5 p.m. Eastern Time on Wednesday, October 13, 2010.

    Docket Numbers: ER10-2826-000.
    Applicants: Buffalo Ridge I LLC.
    Description: Buffalo Ridge I LLC submits tariff filing per 35.12:
Baseline Filing of Market-Based Rate Tariff to be effective 9/22/2010.
    Filed Date: 09/22/2010.
    Accession Number: 20100922-5063.
    Comment Date: 5 p.m. Eastern Time on Wednesday, October 13, 2010.

    Docket Numbers: ER10-2827-000.
    Applicants: Buffalo Ridge II LLC.
    Description: Buffalo Ridge II LLC submits tariff filing per 35.12:
Baseline Filing of Market-Based Rate Tariff to be effective 9/22/2010.
    Filed Date: 09/22/2010.
    Accession Number: 20100922-5064.
    Comment Date: 5 p.m. Eastern Time on Wednesday, October 13, 2010.

    Docket Numbers: ER10-2828-000.
    Applicants: Casselman Windpower LLC.
    Description: Casselman Windpower LLC submits tariff filing per
35.12: Baseline Filing of Market-Based Rate Tariff to be effective 9/
22/2010.
    Filed Date: 09/22/2010.
    Accession Number: 20100922-5069.
    Comment Date: 5 p.m. Eastern Time on Wednesday, October 13, 2010.

    Docket Numbers: ER10-2829-000.
    Applicants: Athens Energy, LLC.
    Description: Athens Energy, LLC submits application for
authorization to make wholesale sales of energy and capacity at
negotiated, market-based rates under ER10-2829.
    Filed Date: 09/22/2010.
    Accession Number: 20100922-0203.
    Comment Date: 5 p.m. Eastern Time on Wednesday, October 13, 2010.

    Docket Numbers: ER10-2830-000.
    Applicants: The Potomac Edison Company.
    Description: The Potomac Edison Company submits tariff filing per
35.12: Potomac Edison Baseline Tariff filing to be effective 9/22/2010.
    Filed Date: 09/22/2010.
    Accession Number: 20100922-5075.
    Comment Date: 5 p.m. Eastern Time on Wednesday, October 13, 2010.

    Docket Numbers: ER10-2831-000.
    Applicants: Colorado Green Holdings LLC.
    Description: Colorado Green Holdings LLC submits tariff filing per
35.12: Baseline Filing of Market-Based Rate Tariff to be effective 9/
22/2010.
    Filed Date: 09/22/2010.
    Accession Number: 20100922-5077.
    Comment Date: 5 p.m. Eastern Time on Wednesday, October 13, 2010.

    Docket Numbers: ER10-2832-000.
    Applicants: West Penn Power Company.
    Description: West Penn Power Company submits tariff filing per
35.12: West Penn Baseline OATT Tariff to be effective 9/22/2010.
    Filed Date: 09/22/2010.
    Accession Number: 20100922-5078.
    Comment Date: 5 p.m. Eastern Time on Wednesday, October 13, 2010.

    Docket Numbers: ER10-2833-000.
    Applicants: East Avenue Energy, LLC.
    Description: East Avenue Energy, LLC submits application for
authorization to make wholesale sales of energy and capacity at
negotiated, market-based rates under ER10-2833.
    Filed Date: 09/22/2010.
    Accession Number: 20100922-0202.
    Comment Date: 5 p.m. Eastern Time on Wednesday, October 13, 2010.

    Docket Numbers: ER10-2834-000.
    Applicants: Munnsville Wind Farm, LLC.
    Description: Munnsville Wind Farm, LLC submits tariff filing per
35.12: Munnsville Wind Farm, LLC Baseline Market-Based Rate Tariff to
be effective 9/22/2010.
    Filed Date: 09/22/2010.
    Accession Number: 20100922-5080.
    Comment Date: 5 p.m. Eastern Time on Wednesday, October 13, 2010.

    Docket Numbers: ER10-2835-000.
    Applicants: Google Energy LLC.
    Description: Google Energy LLC submits tariff filing per 35.12:
Google Energy LLC Baseline Filing for MBR Tariff to be effective 9/22/
2010.
    Filed Date: 09/22/2010.
    Accession Number: 20100922-5083.
    Comment Date: 5 p.m. Eastern Time on Wednesday, October 13, 2010.

    Docket Numbers: ER10-2836-000.
    Applicants: WFM Intermediary New England, LLC.
    Description: WFM Intermediary New England, LLC submits application
for authorization to make wholesale sales of

energy and capacity at negotiated, market-based rates under ER10-2836.
    Filed Date: 09/22/2010.
    Accession Number: 20100922-0204.
    Comment Date: 5 p.m. Eastern Time on Wednesday, October 13, 2010.

    Docket Numbers: ER10-2837-000.
    Applicants: Spark Energy, L.P.
    Description: Spark Energy, L.P. submits tariff filing per 35.12:
Spark Energy, L.P. Baseline Market-Based Rate Tariff to be effective 9/
22/2010.
    Filed Date: 09/22/2010.
    Accession Number: 20100922-5087.
    Comment Date: 5 p.m. Eastern Time on Wednesday, October 13, 2010.

    Docket Numbers: ER10-2838-000.
    Applicants: PacifiCorp.
    Description: PacifiCorp submits its baseline tariff filing of Joint
Ownership and Operating Agreement with Idaho Power, to be effective 9/
22/2010.
    Filed Date: 09/22/2010.
    Accession Number: 20100922-5088.
    Comment Date: 5 p.m. Eastern Time on Wednesday, October 13, 2010.

    Docket Numbers: ER10-2839-000.
    Applicants: Midland Cogeneration Venture Limited Partnership.
    Description: Midland Cogeneration Venture Limited Partnership
submits its baseline electronic filing of its FERC Electric Tariff,
Original Volume No. 1, to be effective 9/22/2010.
    Filed Date: 09/22/2010.
    Accession Number: 20100922-5091.
    Comment Date: 5 p.m. Eastern Time on Wednesday, October 13, 2010.

    Docket Numbers: ER10-2840-000.
    Applicants: PacifiCorp.
    Description: PacifiCorp submits the Project Construction Agreement
with Brigham City, designated as PacifiCorp Rate Schedule FERC No. 661,
to be effective 11/22/2010.
    Filed Date: 09/22/2010.
    Accession Number: 20100922-5092.
    Comment Date: 5 p.m. Eastern Time on Wednesday, October 13, 2010.

    Docket Numbers: ER10-2841-000.
    Applicants: Safeway Inc.
    Description: Safeway Inc. submits tariff filing per 35.12: Safeway,
Inc. Rate Schedule FERC No. 1 Filing to be effective 9/22/2010.
    Filed Date: 09/22/2010.
    Accession Number: 20100922-5094.
    Comment Date: 5 p.m. Eastern Time on Wednesday, October 13, 2010.

    Docket Numbers: ER10-2842-000.
    Applicants: PacifiCorp.
    Description: PacifiCorp submits tariff filing per 35.13(a)(2)(iii):
PGE Harrison Relay Replacement Agreement to be effective 11/22/2010.
    Filed Date: 09/22/2010.
    Accession Number: 20100922-5095.
    Comment Date: 5 p.m. Eastern Time on Wednesday, October 13, 2010.

    Docket Numbers: ER10-2843-000.
    Applicants: GenConn Middletown LLC.
    Description: GenConn Middletown LLC submits tariff filing per
35.12: GenConn Middletown FERC Electric Tariff to be effective 9/22/
2010.
    Filed Date: 09/22/2010.
    Accession Number: 20100922-5097.
    Comment Date: 5 p.m. Eastern Time on Wednesday, October 13, 2010.

    Docket Numbers: ER10-2844-000.
    Applicants: Midwest Independent Transmission System Operator, Inc.
    Description: Midwest Independent Transmission System Operator, Inc.
submits tariff filing per 35: Attachment X Compliance to be effective
8/24/2010.
    Filed Date: 09/22/2010.
    Accession Number: 20100922-5101.
    Comment Date: 5 p.m. Eastern Time on Wednesday, October 13, 2010.

    Docket Numbers: ER10-2845-000.
    Applicants: Southwest Power Pool, Inc.
    Description: Southwest Power Pool, Inc. submits tariff filing per
35.13(a)(2)(iii): 1066 SubR2 Northeast TX. Elec. Coop. NITSA and NOA
Original Docket No. ER10-696 to be effective 7/30/2010.
    Filed Date: 09/22/2010.
    Accession Number: 20100922-5102.
    Comment Date: 5 p.m. Eastern Time on Wednesday, October 13, 2010.

    Docket Numbers: ER10-2846-000.
    Applicants: Huntley Power LLC.
    Description: Huntley Power LLC submits tariff filing per 35.12:
Huntley Power FERC Electric Tariff to be effective 9/22/2010.
    Filed Date: 09/22/2010.
    Accession Number: 20100922-5107.
    Comment Date: 5 p.m. Eastern Time on Wednesday, October 13, 2010.

    Docket Numbers: ER10-2847-000.
    Applicants: TransAlta Centralia Generation LLC.
    Description: TransAlta Centralia Generation LLC submits tariff
filing per 35.12: TACG Baseline Filing to be effective 9/22/2010.
    Filed Date: 09/22/2010.
    Accession Number: 20100922-5110.
    Comment Date: 5 p.m. Eastern Time on Wednesday, October 13, 2010.

    Docket Numbers: ER10-2848-000.
    Applicants: AP Holdings, LLC.
    Description: AP Holdings, LLC submits tariff filing per 35.12: AP
Holdings--Baseline eTariff Filing to be effective 9/22/2010.
    Filed Date: 09/22/2010.
    Accession Number: 20100922-5123.
    Comment Date: 5 pm Eastern Time on Wednesday, October 13, 2010.

    Docket Numbers: ER10-2849-000.
    Applicants: EDF Industrial Power Services (NY), LLC.
    Description: EDF Industrial Power Services (NY), LLC submits tariff
filing per 35.12: Market-based Rate Tariff to be effective 9/22/2010.
    Filed Date: 09/22/2010.
    Accession Number: 20100922-5135.
    Comment Date: 5 p.m. Eastern Time on Wednesday, October 13, 2010.

    Docket Numbers: ER10-2850-000.
    Applicants: California Independent System Operator Corporation.
    Description: California Independent System Operator Corporation
submits tariff filing per 35: 2010-09-22 IBAA Compliance to be
effective 6/28/2010.
    Filed Date: 09/22/2010.
    Accession Number: 20100922-5143.
    Comment Date: 5 p.m. Eastern Time on Wednesday, October 13, 2010.

    Docket Numbers: R10-2851-000.
    Applicants: Alabama Power Company.
    Description: Alabama Power Company submits tariff filing per 35.12:
Baseline Filing to be effective 9/22/2010 under ER10-02851-000 Filing
Type: 370.
    Filed Date: 09/22/2010.
    Accession Number: 20100922-5144.
    Comment Date: 5 p.m. Eastern Time on Wednesday, October 13, 20.
    Docket Numbers: ER10-2852-000.
    Applicants: Eagle Industrial Power Services (IL), LL.
    Description: Eagle Industrial Power Services (IL), LLC submits
tariff filing per 35.12: Market Based Rate to be effective 9/22/2010
under ER10-02852-000 Filing Type: 360.
    Filed Date: 09/22/2010.
    Accession Number: 20100922-5145.
    Comment Date: 5 p.m. Eastern Time on Wednesday, October 13, 2010.

    Docket Numbers: ER10-2853-000.
    Applicants: Ocean State Power.
    Description: Ocean State Power submits tariff filing per 35.12:
Ocean State Power--FERC Electric Tariff to be effective 11/22/2010
under ER10-02853-000 Filing Type: 360.
    Filed Date: 09/22/2010.
    Accession Number: 20100922-5146.
    Comment Date: 5 p.m. Eastern Time on Wednesday, October 13, 2010.

    Any person desiring to intervene or to protest in any of the above
proceedings must file in accordance with Rules 211 and 214 of the
Commission's Rules of Practice and Procedure (18 CFR 385.211 and Sec.
385.214) on or before 5 p.m. Eastern time on the specified comment
date. It is not necessary to separately intervene again in a subdocket
related to a compliance filing if you have previously intervened in the
same

docket. Protests will be considered by the Commission in determining
the appropriate action to be taken, but will not serve to make
protestants parties to the proceeding. Anyone filing a motion to
intervene or protest must serve a copy of that document on the
Applicant. In reference to filings initiating a new proceeding,
interventions or protests submitted on or before the comment deadline
need not be served on persons other than the Applicant.
    As it relates to any qualifying facility filings, the notices of
self-certification [or self-recertification] listed above, do not
institute a proceeding regarding qualifying facility status. A notice
of self-certification [or self-recertification] simply provides
notification that the entity making the filing has determined the
facility named in the notice meets the applicable criteria to be a
qualifying facility. Intervention and/or protest do not lie in dockets
that are qualifying facility self-certifications or self-
recertifications. Any person seeking to challenge such qualifying
facility status may do so by filing a motion pursuant to 18 CFR
292.207(d)(iii). Intervention and protests may be filed in response to
notices of qualifying facility dockets other than self-certifications
and self-recertifications.
    The Commission encourages electronic submission of protests and
interventions in lieu of paper, using the FERC Online links at http://
www.ferc.gov. To facilitate electronic service, persons with Internet
access who will eFile a document and/or be listed as a contact for an
intervenor must create and validate an eRegistration account using the
eRegistration link. Select the eFiling link to log on and submit the
intervention or protests.
    Persons unable to file electronically should submit an original and
14 copies of the intervention or protest to the Federal Energy
Regulatory Commission, 888 First St., NE., Washington, DC 20426.
    The filings in the above proceedings are accessible in the
Commission's eLibrary system by clicking on the appropriate link in the
above list. They are also available for review in the Commission's
Public Reference Room in Washington, DC. There is an eSubscription link
on the Web site that enables subscribers to receive e-mail notification
when a document is added to a subscribed docket(s). For assistance with
any FERC Online service, please e-mail<EMAIL_ADDRESS>or
call<PHONE_NUMBER> (toll free). For TTY, call<PHONE_NUMBER>.

Nathaniel J. Davis, Sr.,
Deputy Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2010-25088 Filed 10-5-10; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6717-01-P


[Federal Register Volume 76, Number 57 (Thursday, March 24, 2011)]
[Notices]
[Page 16653]
[FR Doc No: 2011-6958]

=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION

Federal Aviation Administration

[Summary Notice No. PE-2011-10]

Petition for Exemption; Summary of Petition Received

AGENCY: Federal Aviation Administration (FAA), DOT.

ACTION: Notice of petition for exemption received.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: This notice contains a summary of a petition seeking relief
from specified requirements of 14 CFR. The purpose of this notice is to
improve the public's awareness of, and participation in, this aspect of
FAA's regulatory activities. Neither publication of this notice nor the
inclusion or omission of information in the summary is intended to
affect the legal status of the petition or its final disposition.

DATES: Comments on this petition must identify the petition docket
number involved and must be received on or before April 13, 2011.

ADDRESSES: You may send comments identified by Docket Number FAA-2011-
0196 using any of the following methods:
     Government-wide rulemaking Web site: Go to http://www.regulations.gov and follow the instructions for sending your
comments electronically.
     Mail: Send comments to the Docket Management Facility;
U.S. Department of Transportation, 1200 New Jersey Avenue, SE., West
Building Ground Floor, Room W12-140, Washington, DC 20590.
     Fax: Fax comments to the Docket Management Facility at
202-493-2251.
     Hand Delivery: Bring comments to the Docket Management
Facility in Room W12-140 of the West Building Ground Floor at 1200 New
Jersey Avenue, SE., Washington, DC, between 9 a.m. and 5 p.m., Monday
through Friday, except Federal holidays.
    Privacy: We will post all comments we receive, without change, to
http://www.regulations.gov, including any personal information you
provide. Using the search function of our docket Web site, anyone can
find and read the comments received into any of our dockets, including
the name of the individual sending the comment (or signing the comment
for an association, business, labor union, etc.). You may review DOT's
complete Privacy Act Statement in the Federal Register published on
April 11, 2000 (65 FR 19477-78).
    Docket: To read background documents or comments received, go to
http://www.regulations.gov at any time or to the Docket Management
Facility in Room W12-140 of the West Building Ground Floor at 1200 New
Jersey Avenue, SE., Washington, DC, between 9 a.m. and 5 p.m., Monday
through Friday, except Federal holidays.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: David Staples<PHONE_NUMBER>, Keira
Jones<PHONE_NUMBER>, or Tyneka Thomas<PHONE_NUMBER>, Office of
Rulemaking, Federal Aviation Administration, 800 Independence Avenue,
SW., Washington, DC 20591.
    This notice is published pursuant to 14 CFR 11.85.

    Issued in Washington, DC, on March 21, 2011.
Pamela Hamilton-Powell,
Director, Office of Rulemaking.

Petition for Exemption

    Docket No.: FAA-2011-0196.
    Petitioner: Florida West International Airways, Inc.
    Section of 14 CFR Affected: 14 CFR 121.689(a)(6).
    Description of Relief Sought: Florida West International Airways,
Inc. (FWIA) is requesting relief from the requirement to provide
minimum fuel supply on flight release forms in pounds or gallons. The
exemption will enable FWIA to state the minimum fuel supply in the unit
of measurement that is consistent with the aircraft fuel system and the
company's weight and balance system.

[FR Doc. 2011-6958 Filed 3-23-11; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910-13-P


[Federal Register Volume 85, Number 12 (Friday, January 17, 2020)]
[Notices]
[Pages 3108-3110]
[FR Doc No: 2020-00837]

=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

UNIFIED CARRIER REGISTRATION PLAN

Sunshine Act Meeting Notice; Unified Carrier Registration Plan
Board Subcommittee Meetings

TIME AND DATE: January 27, 2020, from 9:00 a.m. to 5:00 p.m., Central
time.

PLACE: Drury Inn & Suites Riverwalk Hotel, 201 N. St. Mary's Street,
San Antonio, TX. These meetings will also be accessible via conference
call. Any interested person may call 1-866-210-1669, passcode 5253902#,
to listen and participate in the open portions of these meetings.

STATUS: These meetings will be open to the public.

MATTERS TO BE CONSIDERED: The Unified Carrier Registration Plan Board

Subcommittees (each a ``Subcommittee'') will continue their work in
developing and implementing the Unified Carrier Registration Plan and
Agreement. The subject matter of these meetings will include:

Audit Subcommittee Meeting

Proposed Agenda

Portions Open to the Public
I. Call to Order and Roll Call--Subcommittee Chair
    The Subcommittee Chair will welcome attendees, call the meeting to
order, call roll for the Subcommittee, and confirm whether a quorum is
present, and facilitate self-introductions.
II. Verification of Publication of Meeting Notice--UCR Executive
Director
    The UCR Executive Director will verify the publication of meeting
notice on the UCR website and in the Federal Register.
III. Review and Approval of Subcommittee Agenda and Setting of Ground
Rules--Subcommittee Chair
For Discussion and Possible Subcommittee Action
    The Subcommittee Agenda will be reviewed and the Subcommittee will
consider adoption.
Ground Rules
[rtarr8] Subcommittee action only to be taken in designated areas on
agenda
[rtarr8] Please MUTE your phone
[rtarr8] Please do not place the call on HOLD
IV. Approval of Minutes from October 16, 2019 Meeting--UCR Operations
Manager
For Discussion and Possible Subcommittee Action
     Minutes from the October 16, 2019 meeting will be
reviewed. The Subcommittee will consider action to approve.
V. State Compliance Review Results--UCR Depository Manager
For Discussion and Possible Subcommittee Action
    The UCR Depository Manager will review report on key findings from
recently completed state compliance reviews. The Subcommittee may act
to recommend to the Board corrective actions required by the states in
areas deemed not in compliance with UCR policy.
VI. State Audit Performance Standards--UCR Depository Manager
For Discussion and Possible Subcommittee Action
    The Depository Manager will review draft state audit performance
standards. The Subcommittee may act to recommend adoption to the Board.
VII. Report on 2020 State Compliance Reviews--UCR Depository Manager
    The UCR Depository Manager will report on plans for conducting
state compliance reviews in 2020 and answer questions.
VIII. Communication Campaigns--Subcommittee Chair
For Discussion and Possible Subcommittee Action
    The Subcommittee Chair will lead a discussion on the need for UCR
to execute carrier solicitations for states currently running limited
or no campaigns of their own. Next, the Subcommittee Chair will discuss
the need for UCR to execute communications to carriers identified
through roadside inspections to be operating in interstate commerce but
identified in MCMIS as ``inactive'' or ``intrastate.'' The Subcommittee
may act to recommend either or both proposals to the Board.
IX. Potential of Additional Funding for DSL--Subcommittee Chair
    For Discussion and Possible Subcommittee Action
    The Subcommittee Chair will lead a discussion on a proposal for the
UCR Board to fund an additional one-half Full Time Equivalent for DSL
for the purpose of continuing to process prior year Focused Anomalies
Reviews (FARs). The Subcommittee may act to recommend this proposal to
the Board.
X. UCR State-Carrier Audit Methodology--Subcommittee Chair
    For Discussion and Possible Subcommittee Action
    The Subcommittee will consider proposed amendments, related to
state carrier audits, for the UCR Agreement and Handbook in order to
align both guidance documents with current practice and may act to
recommend adoption to the Board.
XI. Report on the Depository Audit for 2017 and 2018--UCR Depository
Manager
    The UCR Depository Manager will report on results from the 2017 and
2018 Depository audits and answer questions
XII. Report on the Depository Financial Statement Audit for 2019--UCR
Depository Manager
    The UCR Depository Manager will report on the status of the
Depository financial audit and answer questions.
XIII. Report on FARs Results 2018-19--DSL Transportation
    The Subcommittee will hear a report on results from the Focused
Anomalies Review (FARs) program in 2018 and 2019.
XIV. National Registration System Updates--Seikosoft
    The Subcommittee will hear a report on the performance of the NRS,
as well as an update on the audit module.
XV. Other Business--Subcommittee Chair
    The Subcommittee Chair will call for any other items the
subcommittee members would like to discuss.
XVI. Adjournment--Subcommittee Chair
    The Subcommittee Chair will adjourn the meeting.

Finance Subcommittee Meeting

Proposed Agenda

I. Call to Order--Subcommittee Chair
    The Subcommittee Chair will welcome attendees, call the meeting to
order, call roll for the Subcommittee and confirm whether a quorum is
present, and facilitate self-introductions.
II. Verification of Meeting Notice--UCR Executive Director
    The UCR Executive Director will verify the publication of meeting
notice on the UCR website and in the Federal Register.
III. Review and Approval of Subcommittee Agenda and Setting of Ground
Rules--Subcommittee Chair
For Discussion and Possible Subcommittee Action
    The agenda will be reviewed and the Subcommittee will consider
adoption.
Ground Rules
[rtarr8] Subcommittee action only to be taken in designated areas on
agenda
[rtarr8] Please MUTE your phone
[rtarr8] Please do not place the call on HOLD
IV. Approval of Minutes from Oct. 16, 2019 Meeting--UCR Operations
Manager
For Discussion and Possible Subcommittee Action
    Minutes from the October 16, 2019 meeting will be reviewed and the

Subcommittee will consider action to approve.
V. Initial 2020 Distributions to States--UCR Depository Manager
For Discussion and Possible Subcommittee Action
    The Subcommittee will review proposed plans for initial
distributions to states for the 2020 registration year and reducing
excess fees from certain past years by including these sums in the
distributions. The Subcommittee may act to recommend adoption of the
proposal to the Board.
VI. Certificates of Deposit--UCR Depository Manager
For Discussion and Possible Subcommittee Action
    The UCR Depository Manager will provide a report on activities
required to redeem certificates of deposit at the Bank of North Dakota
scheduled to mature on February 5, 2020 as well as discuss the need to
reinvest proceeds from the matured CDs. The Subcommittee may act to
recommend adoption of the proposal to the Board.
VII. Board Insurance--UCR Depository Manager
For Discussion and Possible Subcommittee Action
    The Subcommittee will hear a report on plans to procure insurance
for the UCR Board and Officers (directors and officers, cybersecurity,
general liability). The Subcommittee may act to recommend adoption of
the proposal to the Board.
VIII. Financial and Unbudgeted Expense Reserves--UCR Depository Manager
    The UCR Depository Manager will report on the financial and
unbudgeted expense reserve fund.
IX. 2019 Administrative Expenses--UCR Depository Manager
    The UCR Depository Manager will provide a report on 2019
administrative expenses.
X. Other Business--Subcommittee Chair
    The Subcommittee Chair will call for any other items the
Subcommittee members would like to discuss.
XI. Adjourn--Subcommittee Chair
    The Subcommittee Chair will adjourn the meeting.

Education and Training Subcommittee Meeting

Proposed Agenda

I. Call to Order--Subcommittee Chair
    The Subcommittee Chair will welcome attendees, call the meeting to
order, call roll for the Subcommittee, and confirm whether a quorum is
present, and facilitate self-introductions.
II. Verification of Meeting Notice--UCR Executive Director
    The UCR Executive Director will verify publication of meeting
notice on the UCR website and in the Federal Register.
III. Review and Approval of Subcommittee Agenda and Setting of Ground
Rules--Subcommittee Chair
For Discussion and Possible Subcommittee Action
    The Subcommittee Agenda will be reviewed and the Subcommittee will
consider adoption.
Ground Rules
[rtarr8] Subcommittee action only to be taken in designated areas on
agenda
[rtarr8] Please MUTE your phone
[rtarr8] Please do not place the call on HOLD
IV. Approval of Minutes from January 16, 2020 Meeting--UCR Operations
Manager
For Discussion and Possible Subcommittee Action
     Minutes from the January 16, 2020 Education and Training
Subcommittee meeting will be reviewed and the Subcommittee will
consider action to approve.
V. Report on Plans to Launch Training Modules--UCR Operations Manager
    The UCR Operations Manager will report on plans to launch an
initial wave of training modules by June 2020.
VI. Mandatory Training for States--Subcommittee Chair
For Discussion and Possible Subcommittee Action
    The Subcommittee Chair will lead a discussion on a proposed policy
requiring all participating states to engage in UCR trainings once
available. Specifically, the proposed policy would require at least one
state representative to participate in any new remote trainings (e.g.,
videos, webinars) within 30 days of its release, as well as attend any
new live/in-person training when scheduled. The Subcommittee may act to
recommend adoption of this policy to the Board.
VII. Travel Reimbursement for Training Attendees--Subcommittee Chair
For Discussion and Possible Subcommittee Action
    The Subcommittee Chair will next lead a discussion on a proposed
policy stating that UCR will reimburse one attendee from each state for
reasonable travel expenses incurred for attending any mandatory UCR
trainings. The Subcommittee may act to recommend adoption of this
policy to the Board.
VIII. Other Items--Subcommittee Chair
    The Subcommittee Chair will call for any other items the
Subcommittee members would like to discuss.
IX. Adjournment--Subcommittee Chair
    The Subcommittee Chair will adjourn the meeting.
    These agendas will be available no later than 5:00 p.m. Eastern
daylight time, January 17, 2020 at: https://ucrplan.org.

CONTACT PERSON FOR MORE INFORMATION: Elizabeth Leaman, Chair, Unified
Carrier Registration Plan Board of Directors,<PHONE_NUMBER>,
<EMAIL_ADDRESS>
Alex B. Leath,
Chief Legal Officer, Unified Carrier Registration Plan.
[FR Doc. 2020-00837 Filed 1-15-20; 11:15 am]
BILLING CODE 4910-YL-P


[Federal Register: March 20, 2008 (Volume 73, Number 55)]
[Notices]
[Page 15042-15043]
[DOCID:fr20mr08-81]

=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION

Federal Aviation Administration

Notice of Intent To Request Approval From the Office of
Management and Budget of a New Information Collection Activity, Request
for Comments; National Flight Attendant Duty/Rest/Fatigue Survey

AGENCY: Federal Aviation Administration (FAA), DOT.

ACTION: Notice and request for comments.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The FAA invites public comments about our intention to request
the Office of Management and Budget (OMB) to approve a new information
collection. This project involves the random and representative
sampling of Flight Attendants currently employed by U.S. air carriers.
The goal of this effort is to identify the type of fatigue that flight
attendants experience, the frequency with which they experience
fatigue, and the consequences fatigue may have on the safety of U.S.
air carriers.

DATES: Please submit comments by May 19, 2008.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Carla Mauney on<PHONE_NUMBER>, or by
e-mail at<EMAIL_ADDRESS>
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

Federal Aviation Administration (FAA)

    Title: National Flight Attendant Duty/Rest/Fatigue Survey.

    Type of Request: New collection.
    OMB Control Number: 2120-XXXX.
    Form(s): There are no FAA forms associated with this collection.
    Affected Public: A total of 12,000 respondents.
    Frequency: The information is collected annually.
    Estimated Average Burden per Response: Approximately 1 hour per
response.
    Estimated Annual Burden Hours: An estimated 12,000 hours annually.
    Abstract: This project involves the random and representative
sampling of Flight Attendants currently employed by U.S. air carriers.
The goal of this effort is to identify the type of fatigue that flight
attendants experience, the frequency with which they experience
fatigue, and the consequences fatigue may have on the safety of U.S.
air carriers. The results obtained from this survey are intended to
provide information to FAA policy makers regarding flight attendant
rest and duty time.

ADDRESSES: Send comments to the FAA at the following address: Ms. Carla
Mauney, Room 712, Federal Aviation Administration, IT Enterprises
Business Services Division, AES-200, 800 Independence Ave., SW.,
Washington, DC 20591.
    Comments Are Invited On: Whether the proposed collection of
information is necessary for the proper performance of the functions of
the Department, including whether the information will have practical
utility; the accuracy of the Department's estimates of the burden of
the proposed information collection; ways to enhance the quality,
utility and clarity of the information to be collected; and ways to
minimize the burden of the collection of information on respondents,
including the use of automated collection techniques or other forms of
information technology.

    Issued in Washington, DC, on March 13, 2008.
Carla Mauney,
FAA Information Collection Clearance Officer, IT Enterprises Business
Services Division, AES-200.
 [FR Doc. E8-5576 Filed 3-19-08; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4910-13-M


[Federal Register Volume 85, Number 205 (Thursday, October 22, 2020)]
[Notices]
[Page 67347]
[FR Doc No: 2020-23404]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission

Combined Notice of Filings

    Take notice that the Commission has received the following Natural
Gas Pipeline Rate and Refund Report filings:

    Docket Number: PR21-3-000.
    Applicants: Southern California Gas Company.
    Description: Tariff filing per 284.123(b),(e)+(g): Offshore
Delivery Service Rate Revision to be effective 10/1/2020.
    Filed Date: 11/15/20.
    Accession Number:<PHONE_NUMBER>97.
    Comments Due: 5 p.m. ET 11/5/20.
    284.123(g) Protests Due: 5 p.m. ET 12/14/20.

    Docket Numbers: RP21-58-000.
    Applicants: Dominion Energy Overthrust Pipeline, LLC.
    Description: Sec.  4(d) Rate Filing: Revised Title Page to be
effective 11/1/2020.
    Filed Date: 10/15/20.
    Accession Number: 20201015-5102.
    Comments Due: 5 p.m. ET 10/27/20.

    Docket Numbers: RP21-59-000.
    Applicants: Dominion Energy Questar Pipeline, LLC.
    Description: Sec.  4(d) Rate Filing: Revised Title Page to be
effective 11/1/2020.
    Filed Date: 10/15/20.
    Accession Number: 20201015-5106.
    Comments Due: 5 p.m. ET 10/27/20.

    Docket Numbers: RP21-60-000.
    Applicants: White River Hub, LLC.
    Description: Sec.  4(d) Rate Filing: revised title pages to be
effective 11/1/2020.
    Filed Date: 10/15/20.
    Accession Number: 20201015-5109.
    Comments Due: 5 p.m. ET 10/27/20.

    The filings are accessible in the Commission's eLibrary system
(https://elibrary.ferc.gov/idmws/search/fercgensearch.asp) by querying
the docket number.
    Any person desiring to intervene or protest in any of the above
proceedings must file in accordance with Rules 211 and 214 of the
Commission's Regulations (18 CFR 385.211 and 385.214) on or before 5:00
p.m. Eastern time on the specified date(s). Protests may be considered,
but intervention is necessary to become a party to the proceeding.
    eFiling is encouraged. More detailed information relating to filing
requirements, interventions, protests, service, and qualifying
facilities filings can be found at: http://www.ferc.gov/docs-filing/efiling/filing-req.pdf. For other information, call<PHONE_NUMBER>
(toll free). For TTY, call<PHONE_NUMBER>.

    Dated: October 16, 2020.
Nathaniel J. Davis, Sr.,
Deputy Secretary.

[FR Doc. 2020-23404 Filed 10-21-20; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6717-01-P


[Federal Register Volume 81, Number 53 (Friday, March 18, 2016)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Pages 14698-14700]
[FR Doc No: 2016-05900]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION

Federal Aviation Administration

14 CFR Part 39

[Docket No. FAA-2015-2459; Directorate Identifier 2015-NM-002-AD;
Amendment 39-18436; AD 2016-06-05]
RIN 2120-AA64

Airworthiness Directives; The Boeing Company Airplanes

AGENCY: Federal Aviation Administration (FAA), DOT.

ACTION: Final rule.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: We are adopting a new airworthiness directive (AD) for certain
The Boeing Company Model 777 airplanes. This AD was prompted by reports
of fire and smoke at the engine aft pylon area resulting from fuel
leakage caused by a damaged O-ring in the fuel coupling attached to the
wing front spar. This AD requires applying sealant to fill the gap
between the lower wing panels adjacent to the strut aft vapor barrier.
We are issuing this AD to prevent fire and smoke at the engine aft
pylon area in the event of a fuel leak, which could cause personal
injury during ground operations. A fire spreading back and up to the
aft fairing pylon can result in an uncontrolled fire in the strut and
ignite the fuel tank.

DATES: This AD is effective April 22, 2016.
    The Director of the Federal Register approved the incorporation by
reference of a certain publication listed in this AD as of April 22,
2016.

ADDRESSES: For service information identified in this final rule,
contact Boeing Commercial Airplanes, Attention: Data & Services
Management, P.O. Box 3707, MC 2H-65, Seattle, WA 98124-2207; telephone
206-544-5000, extension 1; fax<PHONE_NUMBER>; Internet https://www.myboeingfleet.com. You may view this referenced service information
at the FAA, Transport Airplane Directorate, 1601 Lind Avenue SW.,
Renton, WA. For information on the availability of this material at the
FAA, call<PHONE_NUMBER>. It is also available on the Internet at http://www.regulations.gov by searching for and locating Docket No. FAA-2015-
2459.

Examining the AD Docket

    You may examine the AD docket on the Internet at http://www.regulations.gov by searching for and locating Docket No. FAA-2015-
2459; or in person at the Docket Management Facility between 9 a.m. and
5 p.m., Monday through Friday, except Federal holidays. The AD docket
contains this AD, the regulatory evaluation, any comments received, and
other information. The address for the Docket Office (phone: 800-647-
5527) is Docket Management Facility, U.S. Department of Transportation,
Docket Operations, M-30, West Building Ground Floor, Room W12-140, 1200
New Jersey Avenue SE., Washington, DC 20590.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Kevin Nguyen, Aerospace Engineer,
Propulsion Branch, ANM-140S, FAA, Seattle Aircraft Certification Office
(ACO), 1601 Lind Avenue SW., Renton, WA 98057-3356; phone: 425-917-
6501; fax:<PHONE_NUMBER>; email<EMAIL_ADDRESS>
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

Discussion

    We issued a notice of proposed rulemaking (NPRM) to amend 14 CFR
part 39 by adding an AD that would apply to certain The Boeing Company
Model 777 airplanes. The NPRM published in the Federal Register on July
9, 2015 (80 FR 39392). The NPRM was prompted by reports of fire and
smoke at the engine aft pylon area resulting from fuel leakage caused
by a damaged O ring in the fuel coupling attached to the wing front
spar. The fuel was captured by the fuel coupling rubber boot and was
discharged into the flammable fluid leakage zone of the strut-to-wing
cavity, as intended. However, the fuel did not follow its intended
drain paths into the aft strut and lower wing panel drains, but instead
followed an unintended drain path through an unsealed gap between the
lower wing panels above the strut aft vapor barrier. The leaking fuel
then followed gaps and seams in the aft fairing structure to the
outside of the strut fairing side panels, ignited after

contact with the hot engine exhaust heat shield, and caused a fire and
smoke. We are issuing this AD to prevent fire and smoke at the engine
aft pylon area in the event of a fuel leak, which could cause personal
injury during ground operations. A fire spreading back and up to the
aft fairing pylon can result in an uncontrolled fire in the strut and
ignite the fuel tank.

Comments

    We gave the public the opportunity to participate in developing
this AD. We have considered the comments received. Boeing concurred
with the NPRM (80 FR 39392, dated July 9, 2015), and FedEx had no
technical objection.

Conclusion

    We reviewed the relevant data, considered the comments received,
and determined that air safety and the public interest require adopting
this AD as proposed--except for minor editorial changes. We have
determined that these minor changes:
     Are consistent with the intent that was proposed in the
NPRM (80 FR 39392, dated July 9, 2015) for correcting the unsafe
condition; and
     Do not add any additional burden upon the public than was
already proposed in the NPRM (80 FR 39392, dated July 9, 2015).

Related Service Information Under 1 CFR Part 51

    We have reviewed Boeing Special Attention Service Bulletin 777-54-
0035, dated October 30, 2014. The service information describes
procedures for applying sealant to fill the gap between wing panels.
This service information is reasonably available because the interested
parties have access to it through their normal course of business or by
the means identified in the ADDRESSES section.

Costs of Compliance

    We estimate that this AD affects 196 airplanes of U.S. registry.
    We estimate the following costs to comply with this AD:

                                                 Estimated Costs
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
                                                                                Cost per       Cost on U.S.
              Action                        Labor cost            Parts cost        product         operators
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Sealant application...............  3 work-hours x $85 per                 $0             $255          $49,980
                                     hour = $255.
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Authority for This Rulemaking

    Title 49 of the United States Code specifies the FAA's authority to
issue rules on aviation safety. Subtitle I, section 106, describes the
authority of the FAA Administrator. Subtitle VII: Aviation Programs,
describes in more detail the scope of the Agency's authority.
    We are issuing this rulemaking under the authority described in
Subtitle VII, Part A, Subpart III, Section 44701: ``General
requirements.'' Under that section, Congress charges the FAA with
promoting safe flight of civil aircraft in air commerce by prescribing
regulations for practices, methods, and procedures the Administrator
finds necessary for safety in air commerce. This regulation is within
the scope of that authority because it addresses an unsafe condition
that is likely to exist or develop on products identified in this
rulemaking action.

Regulatory Findings

    This AD will not have federalism implications under Executive Order
13132. This AD will not have a substantial direct effect on the States,
on the relationship between the national government and the States, or
on the distribution of power and responsibilities among the various
levels of government.
    For the reasons discussed above, I certify that this AD:
    (1) Is not a ``significant regulatory action'' under Executive
Order 12866,
    (2) Is not a ``significant rule'' under DOT Regulatory Policies and
Procedures (44 FR 11034, February 26, 1979),
    (3) Will not affect intrastate aviation in Alaska, and
    (4) Will not have a significant economic impact, positive or
negative, on a substantial number of small entities under the criteria
of the Regulatory Flexibility Act.

List of Subjects in 14 CFR Part 39

    Air transportation, Aircraft, Aviation safety, Incorporation by
reference, Safety.

Adoption of the Amendment

    Accordingly, under the authority delegated to me by the
Administrator, the FAA amends 14 CFR part 39 as follows:

PART 39--AIRWORTHINESS DIRECTIVES

0
1. The authority citation for part 39 continues to read as follows:

    Authority: 49 U.S.C. 106(g), 40113, 44701.

Sec.  39.13  [Amended]

0
2. The FAA amends Sec.  39.13 by adding the following new airworthiness
directive (AD):

2016-06-05 The Boeing Company: Amendment 39-18436; Docket No. FAA-
2015-2459; Directorate Identifier 2015-NM-002-AD.

(a) Effective Date

    This AD is effective April 22, 2016.

(b) Affected ADs

    None.

(c) Applicability

    This AD applies to The Boeing Company Model 777-200, -200LR, -
300, -300ER, and -777F series airplanes, certificated in any
category, as identified in Boeing Special Attention Service Bulletin
777-54-0035, dated October 30, 2014.

(d) Subject

    Air Transport Association (ATA) of America Code 54, Nacelles/
Pylons.

(e) Unsafe Condition

    This AD was prompted by reports of fire and smoke at the engine
aft pylon area resulting from fuel leakage caused by a damaged O-
ring in the fuel coupling attached to the wing front spar. We are
issuing this AD to prevent fire and smoke at the engine aft pylon
area in the event of a fuel leak, which could cause personal injury
during ground operations. A fire spreading back and up to the aft
fairing pylon can result in an uncontrolled fire in the strut and
ignite the fuel tank.

(f) Compliance

    Comply with this AD within the compliance times specified,
unless already done.

(g) Sealant Application

    Within 1,875 days after the effective date of this AD, apply
sealant to fill the gap between the lower wing panels adjacent to
the strut aft vapor barrier, in accordance with the Accomplishment
Instructions of Boeing Special Attention Service Bulletin 777-54-
0035, dated October 30, 2014.

(h) Alternative Methods of Compliance (AMOCs)

    (1) The Manager, Seattle Aircraft Certification Office (ACO),
FAA, has the authority to approve AMOCs for this AD, if requested
using the procedures found in 14 CFR 39.19. In accordance with 14
CFR 39.19, send your request to your principal inspector or local
Flight Standards District Office, as appropriate. If sending
information directly to the manager of the ACO, send it to the
attention of the person identified in paragraph (i)(1) of this AD.
Information may be emailed to<EMAIL_ADDRESS>    (2) Before using any approved AMOC, notify your appropriate
principal inspector, or lacking a principal inspector, the manager
of the local flight standards district office/certificate holding
district office.
    (3) For service information that contains steps that are labeled
as Required for Compliance (RC), the provisions of paragraphs
(h)(3)(i) and (h)(3)(ii) apply.
    (i) The steps labeled as RC, including substeps under an RC step
and any figures identified in an RC step, must be done to comply
with the AD. An AMOC is required for any deviations to RC steps,
including substeps and identified figures.
    (ii) Steps not labeled as RC may be deviated from using accepted
methods in accordance with the operator's maintenance or inspection
program without obtaining approval of an AMOC, provided the RC
steps, including substeps and identified figures, can still be done
as specified, and the airplane can be put back in an airworthy
condition.
    (4) An AMOC that provides an acceptable level of safety may be
used for any repair required by this AD if it is approved by the
Boeing Commercial Airplanes Organization Designation Authorization
(ODA) that has been authorized by the Manager, Seattle ACO, to make
those findings. For a repair method to be approved, the repair must
meet the certification basis of the airplane, and the approval must
specifically refer to this AD.

(i) Related Information

    (1) For more information about this AD, contact Kevin Nguyen,
Aerospace Engineer, Propulsion Branch, ANM-140S, FAA, Seattle
Aircraft Certification Office (ACO), 1601 Lind Avenue SW., Renton,
WA 98057-3356; phone:<PHONE_NUMBER>; fax:<PHONE_NUMBER>; email:
<EMAIL_ADDRESS>    (2) For service information identified in this AD, contact
Boeing Commercial Airplanes, Attention: Data & Services Management,
P.O. Box 3707, MC 2H-65, Seattle, WA 98124-2207; telephone 206-544-
5000, extension 1; fax<PHONE_NUMBER>; Internet https://www.myboeingfleet.com. You may view this referenced service
information at the FAA, Transport Airplane Directorate, 1601 Lind
Avenue SW., Renton, WA. For information on the availability of this
material at the FAA, call<PHONE_NUMBER>.

(j) Material Incorporated by Reference

    (1) The Director of the Federal Register approved the
incorporation by reference (IBR) of the service information listed
in this paragraph under 5 U.S.C. 552(a) and 1 CFR part 51.
    (2) You must use this service information as applicable to do
the actions required by this AD, unless the AD specifies otherwise.
    (i) Boeing Special Attention Service Bulletin 777-54-0035, dated
October 30, 2014.
    (ii) Reserved.
    (3) For service information identified in this AD, contact
Boeing Commercial Airplanes, Attention: Data & Services Management,
P.O. Box 3707, MC 2H-65, Seattle, WA 98124-2207; telephone 206-544-
5000, extension 1; fax<PHONE_NUMBER>; Internet https://www.myboeingfleet.com.
    (4) You may view this referenced service information at the FAA,
Transport Airplane Directorate, 1601 Lind Avenue SW., Renton, WA.
For information on the availability of this material at the FAA,
call<PHONE_NUMBER>.
    (5) You may view this service information that is incorporated
by reference at the National Archives and Records Administration
(NARA). For information on the availability of this material at
NARA, call<PHONE_NUMBER>, or go to: http://www.archives.gov/federal-register/cfr/ibr-locations.html.

    Issued in Renton, Washington, on March 9, 2016.
Michael Kaszycki,
Acting Manager, Transport Airplane Directorate, Aircraft Certification
Service.
[FR Doc. 2016-05900 Filed 3-17-16; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910-13-P


[Federal Register: June 13, 2008 (Volume 73, Number 115)]
[Notices]
[Page 33865-33867]
[DOCID:fr13jn08-97]

=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

[Release No. 34-57937; File No. SR-CBOE-2008-58]

Self-Regulatory Organizations; Chicago Board Options Exchange,
Incorporated; Notice of Filing and Immediate Effectiveness of Proposed
Rule Change To Allow the Exchange To Determine To Permit Electronic
Exposure of SAL, HAL, and/or COA Orders to All CBOE Market-Makers

June 6, 2008.
    Pursuant to Section 19(b)(1) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934
(``Act'') \1\ and Rule 19b-4 thereunder,\2\ notice is hereby given that
on June 3, 2008, the Chicago Board Options Exchange, Incorporated
(``CBOE'' or ``Exchange'') filed with the Securities and Exchange
Commission (``Commission'') the proposed rule change as described in
Items I, II, and III below, which Items have been substantially
prepared by CBOE. The Exchange filed the proposal as a ``non-
controversial'' proposed rule change pursuant to Section
19(b)(3)(A)(iii) of the Act \3\ and Rule 19b-4(f)(6) thereunder.\4\ The
Commission is publishing this notice to solicit comments on the
proposed rule change from interested persons.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \1\ 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(1).
    \2\ 17 CFR 240.19b-4.
    \3\ 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(3)(A)(iii).
    \4\ 17 CFR 240.19b-4(f)(6).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

I. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement of the Terms of Substance
of the Proposed Rule Change

    The Exchange proposes to modify Rules 6.13A, Simple Auction Liaison
(``SAL''), 6.14, Hybrid Agency Liaison (``HAL''), and 6.53C(d), Process
for Complex Order RFR Auction (``COA''),

so that the Exchange may determine on a class-by-class basis to permit
electronic exposure of SAL, HAL and/or COA orders to all CBOE Market-
Makers to give additional opportunities to provide the orders with the
best price. The text of the proposed rule change is available on the
Exchange's Web site (http://www.cboe.org/legal), at the Exchange's
Office of the Secretary, and at the Commission's Public Reference Room.

II. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement of the Purpose of, and
Statutory Basis for, the Proposed Rule Change

    In its filing with the Commission, CBOE included statements
concerning the purpose of and basis for the proposed rule change and
discussed any comments it received on the proposed rule change. The
text of those statements may be examined at the places specified in
Item IV below. The Exchange has prepared summaries, set forth in
Sections A, B, and C below, of the most significant aspects of such
statements.

A. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement of the Purpose of, and
Statutory Basis for, the Proposed Rule Change

1. Purpose
    In classes where SAL, HAL and/or COA are activated, orders are
electronically exposed to all Market-Makers appointed to the relevant
option class as well as all members acting as agent for orders at the
top of the Exchange's book (``Qualifying Members'') in the relevant
options series. During the applicable exposure period, the orders that
are subject to exposure are eligible to receive a better price.\5\ At
the conclusion of the SAL, HAL or COA process, as applicable, the order
is then allocated pursuant to the allocation algorithms described in
the relevant rules. In addition, in the case of HAL, if no responses
are received or if there remains an unexecuted portion of a marketable
order, then the remaining balance of the order will be routed through
Linkage to a competing exchange(s).\6\ When an order is sent through
Linkage, the other exchange charges an execution fee. The cost of
sending the order through Linkage can be substantial, particularly with
respect to other options exchanges that have adopted a maker-taker fee
schedule.\7\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \5\ SAL is a feature within CBOE's Hybrid System that auctions
eligible marketable orders for price improvement over the national
best bid or offer (``NBBO''). See Rule 6.13A. HAL is a feature
within CBOE's Hybrid System that provides automated order handling
for eligible market and limit orders if: (i) The market orders or
limit orders are marketable against the Exchange's disseminated
quotation while that quotation is not at the NBBO; (ii) the limit
orders would improve the Exchange's disseminated quotation and are
marketable against quotations disseminated by other exchanges
participating in the Intermarket Options Linkage (``Linkage''); and
(iii) for Hybrid 3.0 classes, the limit orders would improve the
Exchange's disseminated quotation, except when the disseminated
quotation is represented by a manual quote. See Rule 6.14. COA is a
feature within CBOE's Hybrid System that auctions eligible complex
orders for price improvement. See Rule 6.53C.
    \6\ If the remaining order balance is for the account of a
public customer and is marketable against another exchange that is a
participant in Linkage, then HAL will route a Principal Acting as
Agent Linkage Order (``P/A Order'') on behalf of the remaining order
balance through the Linkage and any resulting execution of the P/A
Order will be allocated to that order. If the remaining order
balance is marketable against another exchange that is a participant
in Linkage but is not for the account of a public customer, then HAL
will route a Principal Linkage Order (``P Order'') on behalf of the
Remaining Order through the Linkage and any resulting execution of
the P Order will be allocated to the remaining order. In either
situation above, if the Linkage order cannot be transmitted from the
Exchange because the price of the Linkage order (or a better price)
is no longer available on any market, then HAL will, pursuant to
normal order allocation processing, execute the remaining order
balance against the Exchange's existing quote (provided such
execution would not cause a trade-through) or, if the Exchange's
quote is inferior to the Exchange's best bid or offer at the time
the order was received by HAL (``Exchange Initial BBO''), against
the Market-Makers that constituted the Exchange Initial BBO at a
price equal to the Exchange Initial BBO. If the remaining order is
not marketable (either on CBOE or another exchange), it will be
entered into the Hybrid book for dissemination. See Rule
6.14(b)(i)--(iii).
    \7\ Several options exchanges have adopted a fee structure in
which firms receive a rebate for the execution of orders resting in
the limit order book (i.e., posting liquidity) and pay a fee for the
execution of orders that trade against liquidity resting on the
limit order book (i.e., taking liquidity). Taker fees currently
range up to $0.45 per contract and are charged without consideration
of the order origin category, including public customer orders. In
contrast, CBOE does not generally charge a fee for the execution of
public customer orders that are routed directly to our market. The
effective price paid by a customer purchasing an option can be
considerably higher on an exchange that charges a taker fee. For
example, a customer that enters a marketable limit order to buy 10
contracts for $0.10 would pay $100 on CBOE and $104.50 if executed
on an exchange that charges a $0.45 taker fee (an effective 4.5%
increase). Because orders cannot be executed at prices inferior to
the NBBO, members are effectively forced to pay taker fees when an
exchange with a taker fee structure is at the NBBO and the members'
orders are directly routed to such an exchange or indirectly routed
to such an exchange through Linkage (where the fees are passed
through).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    In order to offer additional opportunities for price improvement
and, in the case of HAL, to retain as much order flow as possible on
CBOE and to help reduce costs associated with the number of orders sent
through Linkage,\8\ CBOE proposes to allow the Exchange to determine on
a class-by-class basis to permit responses to orders exposed through
SAL, HAL and/or COA to be submitted by all CBOE Market-Makers (not just
Market-Makers appointed to the relevant option class) and Qualifying
Members. This would provide for additional opportunities to provide
orders with price improvement and, in the case of HAL, to provide those
orders with the best price on CBOE instead of routing the order through
Linkage.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \8\ Outbound Linkage costs are incurred by CBOE and its members.
CBOE currently rebates DPM transaction fees generated from
transactions against customer orders that underlie outbound PA and P
Orders (``CBOE Transactions''). In addition, when DPMs incur fees to
execute PA or P Orders at other exchanges (``Away Transactions''),
those DPMs are credited an additional amount per contract to offset
such fees. CBOE also credits DPMs an additional amount per contract
on both CBOE Transactions and Away Transactions to offset the Sales
Value Fee (which offsets fees payable to the Commission under
Section 31 of the Act), the Options Clearing Corporation (``OCC'')
per contract fee applicable to market-makers and specialists set
forth on the OCC Schedule of Fees, and an estimated average clearing
firm per contract fee. In the case of a P Order, the Exchange also
passes through the total amount of the credits above to the member
that originated the order underlying the P Order. See Section 21 of
the CBOE Fees Schedule.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    For such classes, each CBOE Market-Maker that submits a response to
trade with an order during the response period would be entitled to
receive an allocation of the order in accordance with the existing
allocation algorithms in effect for the option class, as described in
the SAL, HAL and COA rules, as applicable. All other provisions of the
SAL, HAL and/or COA rules, as applicable, would apply unchanged.
    To the extent the Exchange determines to permit all CBOE Market-
Makers to respond to SAL, HAL and/or COA, the Exchange may also
determine to apply a seat cost, if any, to Market-Makers not assigned
to the class that elect to receive the SAL, HAL and/or COA messages.
Any such seat cost so determined by the Exchange would be submitted to
the Commission in a separate rule filing.
2. Statutory Basis
    The Exchange believes the proposed rule change is consistent with
Section 6(b) of the Act \9\ in general and furthers the objectives of
Section 6(b)(5) of the Act \10\ in particular in that it is designed to
foster cooperation and coordination with persons engaged in regulating,
clearing, settling, processing information with respect to, and
facilitating transactions in securities, to remove impediments to and
perfect the mechanism of a free and open market and a national market
system, and, in general, to protect investors and the

public interest. In particular, the Exchange believes that the proposed
change would give additional opportunities to provide orders executions
at improved prices and, in the case of HAL, executions at the NBBO on
CBOE and reduce costs by reducing the number of Linkage orders sent to
other exchanges.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \9\ 15 U.S.C. 78f(b).
    \10\ 15 U.S.C. 78f(b)(5).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

B. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement on Burden on Competition

    CBOE does not believe that the proposed rule change will impose any
burden on competition not necessary or appropriate in furtherance of
the purposes of the Act.

C. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement on Comments on the Proposed
Rule Change Received From Members, Participants, or Others

    The Exchange neither solicited nor received comments on the
proposal.

III. Date of Effectiveness of the Proposed Rule Change and Timing for
Commission Action

    Because the foregoing proposed rule change does not: (i)
Significantly affect the protection of investors or the public
interest; (ii) impose any significant burden on competition; and (iii)
become operative for 30 days from the date on which it was filed, or
such shorter time as the Commission may designate, if consistent with
the protection of investors and the public interest, it has become
effective pursuant to Section 19(b)(3)(A) of the Act \11\ and Rule 19b-
4(f)(6) thereunder.\12\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \11\ 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(3)(A).
    \12\ 17 CFR 240.19b-4(f)(6). In addition, Rule 19b-4(f)(6)(iii)
requires that a self-regulatory organization submit to the
Commission written notice of its intent to file the proposed rule
change, along with a brief description and text of the proposed rule
change, at least five business days prior to the date of filing of
the proposed rule change, or such shorter time as designated by the
Commission. The Commission notes that the Exchange has satisfied the
five-day pre-filing notice requirement.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    At any time within 60 days of the filing of such proposed rule
change, the Commission may summarily abrogate such rule change if it
appears to the Commission that such action is necessary or appropriate
in the public interest, for the protection of investors, or otherwise
in furtherance of the purposes of the Act.

IV. Solicitation of Comments

    Interested persons are invited to submit written data, views and
arguments concerning the foregoing, including whether the proposed rule
change is consistent with the Act. Comments may be submitted by any of
the following methods:

Electronic Comments

     Use the Commission's Internet comment form (http://
www.sec.gov/rules/sro.shtml); or
     Send an e-mail to<EMAIL_ADDRESS>Please include
File Number SR-CBOE-2008-58 on the subject line.

Paper Comments

     Send paper comments in triplicate to Secretary, Securities
and Exchange Commission, 100 F Street, NE., Washington, DC 20549-1090.

All submissions should refer to File Number SR-CBOE-2008-58. This file
number should be included on the subject line if e-mail is used. To
help the Commission process and review your comments more efficiently,
please use only one method. The Commission will post all comments on
the Commission's Internet Web site (http://www.sec.gov/rules/
sro.shtml). Copies of the submission, all subsequent amendments, all
written statements with respect to the proposed rule change that are
filed with the Commission, and all written communications relating to
the proposed rule change between the Commission and any person, other
than those that may be withheld from the public in accordance with the
provisions of 5 U.S.C. 552, will be available for inspection and
copying in the Commission's Public Reference Room, 100 F Street, NE.,
Washington, DC 20549, on official business days between the hours of 10
a.m. and 3 p.m. Copies of such filing also will be available for
inspection and copying at the principal office of the CBOE. All
comments received will be posted without change; the Commission does
not edit personal identifying information from submissions. You should
submit only information that you wish to make available publicly. All
submissions should refer to File Number SR-CBOE-2008-58 and should be
submitted on or before July 7, 2008.

    For the Commission, by the Division of Trading and Markets,
pursuant to delegated authority.\13\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \13\ 17 CFR 200.30-3(a)(12).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

Florence E. Harmon,
Acting Secretary.
[FR Doc. E8-13303 Filed 6-12-08; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 8010-01-P


SF 83 SUPPORTING STATEMENT ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY NSPS for Sulfuric Acid Plants ( 40 CFR Part 60, Subpart H) ( Renewal)

1. Identification of the Information Collection 1( a) Title of the Information Collection NSPS for Sulfuric Acid Plants ( 40 CFR part 60, subpart H) ( Renewal)

1( b) Short Characterization/ Abstract The New Source Performance Standards ( NSPS) for Sulfuric acid Plants ( 40 CFR part 60, subpart H), were proposed on August 17, 1971 and promulgated on December 23, 1971, amended on June 14, 1974 ( 39 FR 20794), October 6, 1975 ( 40 FR 46258), May 25, 1983 ( 48 FR 23611), September 29, 1983 ( 48 FR 4700), October 20, 1983 ( 48 FR 48669), February 14, 1989 ( 54 FR 6666) and October 17, 2000 ( 65 FR 61753). These regulations apply to any sulfuric acid facility commencing construction, modification or reconstruction after the date of proposal. A sulfuric acid plant is any facility producing sulfuric acid ( H 2 SO 4) by the contact process by burning elemental sulfur, alkylation acid, hydrogen sulfide, organic sulfides and mercaptans, or acid sludge. A sulfuric acid plant does not include facilities where conversion to sulfuric acid is used primarily as a means of preventing emissions to the atmosphere of sulfur dioxide ( SO 2) or other sulfur compounds.

In general, all NSPS standards require initial notifications, performance tests, and periodic reports. Owners or operators are also required to maintain records of the occurrence and duration of any startup, shutdown, or malfunction in the operation of an affected facility, or any period during which the monitoring system is inoperative. These notifications, reports, and records are essential in determining compliance, and are required of all affected facilities.

Any owner or operator subject to the provisions of this part will maintain a file of these measurements, and retain the file for at least two years following the date of such measurements, maintenance reports, and records. All reports are sent to the delegated state or local authority. In the event that there is no such delegated authority, the reports are sent directly to the United States Environmental Protection Agency ( EPA) regional office.

Based on our consultations with industry representatives, there is an average of one affected facility at each plant site and that each plant site has only one respondent ( i. e., the owner/ operator of the plant site).

Approximately 103 respondents are currently subject to the regulation, and it is estimated that no additional respondents per year will become subject to the regulation in the next three years. 2 The Office of Management and Budget ( OMB) approved the current Information Collection Request ( ICR) without any " Terms of Clearance."

2. Need for and Use of the Collection 2( a) Need/ Authority for the Collection The EPA is charged under Section 111 of the Clean Air Act ( CAA), as amended, to establish standards of performance for new stationary sources that reflect:

. . . application of the best technological system of continuous emissions reduction which ( taking into consideration the cost of achieving such emissions reduction, or any non air quality health and environmental impact and energy requirements) the Administrator determines has been adequately demonstrated. Section 111( a)( l).

The Agency refers to this charge as selecting the best demonstrated technology ( BDT). Section 111 also requires that the Administrator review and, if appropriate, revise such standards every four years.

In addition, section 114( a) states that the Administrator may require any owner/ operator subject to any requirement of this Act to:

( A) Establish and maintain such records; ( B) make such reports; ( C) install, use, and maintain such monitoring equipment, and use such audit procedures, or methods; ( D) sample such emissions ( in accordance with such procedures or methods, at such locations, at such intervals, during such periods, and in such manner as the Administrator shall prescribe); ( E) keep records on control equipment parameters, production variables or other indirect data when direct monitoring of emissions is impractical; ( F) submit compliance certifications in accordance with Section 114( a)( 3); and ( G) provide such other information as the Administrator may reasonably require.

In the Administrator's judgment, SO 2 emissions from sulfuric acid plants cause or contribute to air pollution that may reasonably be anticipated to endanger public health or welfare. Therefore, the NSPS were promulgated for this source category at 40 CFR part 60, subpart H.

2( b) Practical Utility/ Users of the Data The recordkeeping and reporting requirements in the standard ensure compliance with the 3 applicable regulations which were promulgated in accordance with the Clean Air Act. The collected information is also used for targeting inspections and as evidence in legal proceedings.

Performance tests are required in order to determine an affected facility's initial capability to comply with the emission standard. Continuous emission monitors are used to ensure compliance with the standard at all times. During the performance test a record of the operating parameters under which compliance was achieved may be recorded and used to determine compliance in place of a continuous emission monitor.

The notifications required in the standards are used to inform the Agency or delegated authority when a source becomes subject to the requirements of the regulations. The reviewing authority may then inspect the source to ensure that the pollution control devices are properly installed and operated, that leaks are being detected and repaired, and that the standards are being met. The performance test may also be observed.

The required semiannual reports are used to determine periods of excess emissions, identify problems at the facility, verify operation/ maintenance procedures and for compliance determinations.

3. Nonduplication, Consultations, and Other Collection Criteria The requested recordkeeping and reporting are required under 40 CFR part 60, subpart H.

3( a) Nonduplication If the subject standards have not been delegated, the information is sent directly to the appropriate EPA regional office. Otherwise, the information is sent directly to the delegated state or local agency. If a state or local agency has adopted its own similar standards to implement the Federal standards, a copy of the report submitted to the state or local agency can be sent to the Administrator in lieu of the report required by the Federal standards. Therefore, no duplication exists.

3( b) Public Notice Required Prior to ICR Submission to OMB An announcement of a public comment period for the renewal of this ICR was published in the Federal Register ( 70 FR 24020) on May 6, 2005. No comments were received on the burden published in the Federal Register.

3( c) Consultations For this information collection, we referenced the most recent ICR, consulted with the preparer of the active ICR, and used other resources to obtain the most recent data available. We reviewed information available from the United States Census Bureau, the Air Facility System 4 ( AFS), and websites covering sulfuric acid plants. We also consulted with the EPA's Office of Air Quality Planning and Standards, Information Transfer, the Program Integration Division.

After reviewing our internal data sources and industry experts, we have determined that additional consultations with industry are inappropriate for this ICR renewal.

The standard was developed with the participation and/ or consultation with industry representatives. In addition, the Agency has performed additional reviews to determine additional burden reduction opportunities. The Agency currently collects the minimum amount of information necessary to ensure compliance with the standard.

3( d) Effects of Less Frequent Collection Less frequent information collection would decrease the margin of assurance that facilities are continuing to meet the standards. Requirements for information gathering and recordkeeping are useful techniques to ensure that good operation and maintenance practices are applied and emission limitations are met. If the information required by these standards was collected less frequently, the likelihood of detecting poor operation and maintenance of control equipment and noncompliance would decrease.

3( e) General Guidelines None of these reporting or recordkeeping requirements violate any of the regulations established by OMB at 5 CFR 1320.5.

These standards require the respondents to maintain all records, including reports and notifications for at least five years. This is consistent with the General Provisions as applied to the standards. EPA believes that the five year records retention requirement is consistent with Part 70 permit program and the five year statute of limitations on which the permit program is based. Also, the retention of records for five years would allow EPA to establish the compliance history of a source and any pattern of compliance for purposes of determining the appropriate level of enforcement action. Historically, EPA has found that the most flagrant violators frequently have violations extending beyond the five years. EPA would be prevented from pursuing the worst violators due to the destruction or nonexistence of records if records were retained for less than five years.

3( f) Confidentiality Any information submitted to the Agency for which a claim of confidentiality is made will be safeguarded according to the Agency policies set forth in Title 40, Chapter 1, part 2, subpart B  Confidentiality of Business Information ( see 40 CFR 2; 41 FR 36902, September 1, 1976; amended by 43 FR 40000, September 8, 1978; 43 FR 42251, September 20, 1978; 44 FR 17674, March 23, 1979). 5 3( g) Sensitive Questions None of the reporting or recordkeeping requirements contain sensitive questions.

4. The Respondents and the Information Requested 4( a) Respondents/ SIC Codes The respondents to the recordkeeping and reporting requirements are sulfuric acid plants. The United States Standard Industrial Classification ( SIC) code for the respondents affected by the standards is SIC 2819 which corresponds to the The North American Industry Classification System ( NAICS) 325188 for inorganic chemical manufacturing.

4( b) Information Requested None of these reporting or recordkeeping requirements violate any of the regulations established by OMB at 5 CFR 1320.5.

( i) Data Items All data in this ICR that are recorded and/ or reported are required by NSPS for Sulfuric Acid Plants ( 40 CFR part 60, subpart H) ( Renewal).

A source must make the following reports:

Notification Reports Standard Citation by Section Notification of construction/ reconstruction 60.7( a)( 1)

Notification of actual startup 60.7( a)( 3)

Notification of physical or operational change 60.7( a)( 4)

Notification of continuous monitoring system ( CMS) demonstration 60.7( a)( 5)

Initial performance test results 60.8( a)

Initial performance test 60.8( d)

Reference Test Method 9 60.11( b)

Reports Semiannual report of excess emissions 60.7( c) 6 A source must keep the following records:

Recordkeeping Maintain records of startup, shutdown, malfunction period where the continuous monitoring system is inoperative 60.7( b)

Maintain records for two years 60.7( f)

Subsequent annual performance tests, as required 60.7( f)

Electronic Reporting At the present, respondents are using monitoring equipment that automatically records parameter data. Although personnel at the affected facility must evaluate the data, this internal automation has significantly reduced the burden associated with monitoring and recordkeeping at the plant site.

Also, regulatory agencies in cooperation with the respondents, continue to create reporting systems to transmit data electronically. However, electronic reporting systems are still not widely used. At this time, it is estimated that approximately 20 percent of the respondents use electronic reporting.

( ii) Respondent Activities Respondent Activities Read instructions.

Perform initial performance test, Reference Method 9 test, and repeat performance tests if necessary.

Write the notifications and reports listed above.

Enter information required to be recorded above.

Submit the required reports developing, acquiring, installing, and utilizing technology and systems for the purpose of collecting, validating, and verifying information.

Develop, acquire, install, and utilize technology and systems for the purpose of processing and maintaining information.

Develop, acquire, install, and utilize technology and systems for the purpose of disclosing and providing information. 7 Respondent Activities Adjust the existing ways to comply with any previously applicable instructions and requirements.

Train personnel to be able to respond to a collection of information.

Transmit, or otherwise disclose the information.

Currently, sources are using automated monitoring equipment that provides parameter data. Although personnel at the sources still need to evaluate the data, this type of monitoring equipment has significantly reduced the burden associated with monitoring and recordkeeping.

5. The Information Collected: Agency Activities, Collection Methodology, and Information Management 5( a) Agency Activities EPA conducts the following activities in connection with the acquisition, analysis, storage, and distribution of the required information.

Agency Activities Observe initial performance tests and repeat performance tests if necessary.

Review notifications and reports, including performance test reports, and excess emissions reports, required to be submitted by industry.

Audit facility records.

Input, analyze, and maintain data in the Air Facility System ( AFS).

5( b) Collection Methodology and Management Following notification of startup, the reviewing authority might inspect the source to determine whether the pollution control devices are properly installed and operated. Performance test reports are used by the Agency to discern a source's initial capability to comply with the emission standard and the operating conditions under which compliance was achieved. Data and records maintained by the respondents are tabulated and published for use in compliance and enforcement programs. The semiannual reports are used for problem identification, as a check on source operation and maintenance, and for compliance determinations.

Information contained in the reports is entered into the AFS which is operated and maintained by EPA's Office of Compliance. AFS is EPA's database for the collection, maintenance, and retrieval of compliance data for approximately 125,000 industrial and 8 government owned facilities. EPA uses the AFS for tracking air pollution compliance and enforcement by local and state regulatory agencies, EPA regional offices and EPA headquarters. EPA and its delegated Authorities can edit, store, retrieve and analyze the data.

The records required by this regulation must be retained by the owner/ operator for two years.

5( c) Small Entity Flexibility A majority of the respondents are large entities ( i. e., large businesses). However, the impact on small entities ( i. e., small businesses) was taken into consideration during the development of the regulation. Due to technical considerations involving the process operations and the types of control equipment employed, the recordkeeping and reporting requirements are the same for both small and large entities. The Agency considers these requirements the minimum needed to ensure compliance and, therefore, cannot reduce them further for small entities. To the extent that larger businesses can use economies of scale to reduce their burden, the overall burden will be reduced.

5( d) Collection Schedule The specific frequency for each information collection activity within this request is shown in Table 1: Annual Industry Burden for NSPS for Sulfuric Acid Plants ( 40 CFR Part 60, Subpart H) ( Renewal).

6. Estimating the Burden and Cost of the Collection Table 1 documents the computation of individual burdens for the recordkeeping and reporting requirements applicable to the industry for the subpart included in this ICR. The individual burdens are expressed under standardized headings believed to be consistent with the concept of burden under the Paperwork Reduction Act. Where appropriate, specific tasks and major assumptions have been identified. Responses to this information collection are mandatory.

The Agency may not conduct or sponsor, and a person is not required to respond to, a collection of information unless it displays a currently valid OMB Control Number.

6( a) Estimating Respondent Burden The average annual burden to industry over the next three years from these recordkeeping and reporting requirements is estimated to be 26,177 ( Total Labor Hours from Table 1). These hours are based on Agency studies and background documents from the development of the regulation, Agency knowledge and experience with the NSPS program, the previously approved ICR, and any comments received. 9 6( b) Estimating Respondent Costs ( i) Estimating Labor Costs This ICR uses the following labor rates:

Managerial $ 97.46 ($ 46.41 + 110%) Technical $ 83.71 ($ 39.86 + 110%) Clerical $ 42.55 ($ 20.26 + 110%)

These rates are from the United States Department of Labor, Bureau of Labor Statistics, March 19, 2005, " Table 2. Civilian Workers, by occupational and industry group." The rates are from column 1, " Total compensation." The rates have been increased by 110 percent to account for the benefit packages available to those employed by private industry.

( ii) Estimating Capital/ Startup and Operation and Maintenance Costs The type of industry costs associated with the information collection activities in the subject standard are both labor costs which are addressed elsewhere in this ICR and the costs associated with continuous monitoring. The capital/ startup costs are one time costs when a facility becomes subject to the regulation. The annual operation and maintenance costs are the ongoing costs to maintain the monitors and other costs such as photocopying and postage.

( iii) Capital/ Startup vs. Operation and Maintenance ( O& M) Costs Capital/ Startup vs. Operation and Maintenance ( O& M) Costs ( A) Continuous Monitoring Device ( B) Capital/ Startup Cost for One Respondent ( C) Number of New Respondents ( D) Total Capital/ Startup Cost, ( B X C) ( E) Annual O& M Costs for One Respondent ( F) Number of Respondents with O& M ( G) Total O& M, ( E X F)

CMS $ 120,000 0 $ 0 $ 4,500 103 $ 463,500 The total capital/ startup costs for this ICR are $ 0. This is the total of column D in the above table. These costs are shown on the OMB 83 I form in block 14( a), Total annualized capital/ startup costs.

The total operation and maintenance ( O& M) costs for this ICR are $ 463,500. This is the total of column G. These costs are shown on on the OMB 83 I form in block 14( b), Total annual costs ( O& M).

The total respondent costs in block 14 have been calculated as the addition of the capital/ startup costs, and the annual operation and maintenance costs. The average annual cost 10 for capital/ startup and operation and maintenance costs to industry over the next three years of the ICR is estimated to be $ 464,000 ( rounded). This cost is shown on the OMB 83 I form in block 14( c), Total annualized cost requested. The numbers in block 14 of the OMB 83 I form are rounded to show the cost in thousands of dollars.

6( c) Estimating Agency Burden and Cost The only costs to the Agency are those costs associated with analysis of the reported information. EPA's overall compliance and enforcement program includes activities such as the examination of records maintained by the respondents, periodic inspection of sources of emissions, and the publication and distribution of collected information.

The average annual Agency cost during the three years of the ICR is estimated to be $ 38,416.

This cost is based on the average hourly labor rate as follows:

Managerial $ 56.02 ( GS 13, Step 5, $ 35.01 x 1.6) Technical $ 41.57 ( GS 12, Step 1, $ 25.98 x 1.6) Clerical $ 22.50 ( GS 6, Step 3, $ 14.06 x 1.6)

These rates are from the Office of Personnel Management ( OPM) " 2005 General Schedule" which excludes locality rates of pay. Details upon which this estimate is based appear in Table 2: NSPS for Sulfuric Acid Plants ( 40 CFR Part 60, Subpart H) ( Renewal), attached.

6( d) Estimating the Respondent Universe and Total Burden and Costs Based on our research for this ICR, on average over the next three years, approximately 103 existing respondents will be subject to the standard. It is estimated that no additional respondents per year will become subject. The overall average number of respondents, as shown in the table below is 103 per year.

The number of respondents is calculated using the following table which addresses the three years covered by this ICR. 11 Number of Respondents Respondents That Submit Reports Respondents That Do Not Submit Any Reports Year ( A) Number of New Respondents ( B) Number of Existing Respondents ( C) Number of Existing Respondents That Keep Records but Do Not Submit Reports ( D) Number of Existing Respondents That Are Also New Respondents ( E) Number of Respondents ( E= A+ B+ C D)

1 0 103 0 0 103 2 0 103 0 0 103 3 0 103 0 0 103 Average 0 103 0 0 103 To avoid double counting respondents column D is subtracted. As shown above, the average Number of Respondents over the three year period of this ICR is 103. This number appears on the OMB 83 I form in block 13( a), Number of respondents.

Total Annual Responses ( A) Information Collection Activity ( B) Number of Respondents ( C) Number of Responses ( D) Number of Existing Respondents That Keep Records But Do Not Submit Reports ( E) Total Annual Responses E=( BxC)+ D Application of construction or modification 0 1 N/ A 0 Notification of actual startup 0 1 N/ A 0 Notification of physical or operational change 0 1 N/ A 0 Notification of demonstration of CMS 0 1 N/ A 0 Notification of initial performance test 0 1 N/ A 0 Semiannual report of excess emissions 103 2 N/ A 206 Total 206 12 The number of Total Annual Responses is 206. This number is shown on the OMB 83 I form in block 13( b), Total annual responses.

The Total Hours Requested is shown on the OMB 83 I form in block 13( c). The total annual labor costs are $ 2,113,271. The annual labor costs are not shown on the OMB 83 I form. Details regarding these estimates may be found in Table 1. Annual Respondent Burden and Cost, NSPS for Sulfuric Acid Plants ( 40 CFR Part 60, Subpart H) ( Renewal), attached.

6( e) Bottom Line Burden Hours Burden Hours and Cost Tables The detailed bottom line burden hours and cost calculations for the respondents and the Agency are shown in Tables 1 and 2, respectively, and summarized below.

( i) Respondent Tally The Total Hours Requested is shown on the OMB 83 I form in block 13( c). The total annual labor costs are $ 2,113,271. The annual labor costs are not shown on the OMB 83 I form. Details regarding these estimates may be found in Table 1. Annual Respondent Burden and Cost, NSPS for Sulfuric Acid Plants ( 40 CFR Part 60, Subpart H) ( Renewal), attached. Furthermore, the annual public reporting and recordkeeping burden for this collection of information is estimated to average 127 hours per response.

The total annual capital/ startup and O& M costs to the regulated entity are $ 464,000. This number is shown on the OMB 83 I form in block 14( c), Total annualized cost requested. The cost calculations are detailed in Section 6( b)( iii), Capital/ Startup vs. Operation and Maintenance ( O& M) Costs.

( ii) The Agency Tally The average annual Agency burden and cost over next three years is estimated to be 948 labor hours at a cost of $ 38,416. See Table 2. Annual Agency Burden and Cost, NSPS for Sulfuric Acid Plants ( 40 CFR Part 60, Subpart H) ( Renewal), attached.

6( f) Reasons for Change in Burden The increase in burden from the most recently approved ICR is due to the fact that we are presently accountings for management and clerical person hours per year, which was omitted in the active ICR, and a revised salary table. There is, however, a decline in the number of sources. 13 The renewal ICR shows that there are approximately 103 sources associated with the rule, as compared to the active ICR that shows 106 sources. This decline in the number of sources is due to plant closure. No new facilities are expected to be constructed in the next three years.

Because there are no new sources with reporting requirements, no capital/ startup costs are incurred. The only cost that is incurred is for the operation and maintenance ( O& M) of the monitoring equipment.

6( g) Burden Statement The annual public reporting and recordkeeping burden for this collection of information is estimated to average 127 hours per response. Burden means the total time, effort, or financial resources expended by persons to generate, maintain, retain, or disclose or provide information to or for a Federal agency. This includes the time needed to review instructions; develop, acquire, install, and utilize technology and systems for the purposes of collecting, validating, and verifying information, processing and maintaining information, and disclosing and providing information; adjust the existing ways to comply with any previously applicable instructions and requirements; train personnel to be able to respond to a collection of information; search data sources; complete and review the collection of information; and transmit or otherwise disclose the information.

An agency may not conduct or sponsor, and a person is not required to respond to, a collection of information unless it displays a valid OMB Control Number. The OMB Control Numbers for EPA's regulations are listed at 40 CFR part 9 and 48 CFR chapter 15.

To comment on the Agency's need for this information, the accuracy of the provided burden estimates, and any suggested methods for minimizing respondent burden, including the use of automated collection techniques, EPA has established a public docket for this ICR under Docket ID Number OECA 2005 0025, which is available for public viewing at the Enforcement and Compliance Docket and Information Center in the EPA Docket Center ( EPA/ DC), EPA West, Room B102, 1301 Constitution Avenue, N. W., Washington, D. C. The EPA Docket Center Public Reading Room is open from 8: 30 a. m. to 4: 30 p. m., Monday through Friday, excluding legal holidays. The telephone number for the Reading Room is ( 202) 566 1744, and the telephone number for the Enforcement and Compliance Docket and Information Center is ( 202) 566 1752. An electronic version of the public docket is available through EPA Dockets ( EDOCKET) at http:// www. epa. gov/ edocket. Use EDOCKET to submit or view public comments, access the index listing of the contents of the public docket, and to access those documents in the public docket that are available electronically. When in the system, select " search," then key in the Docket ID Number identified above. Also, you can send comments to 14 the Office of Information and Regulatory Affairs, Office of Management and Budget, 725 17th Street, N. W., Washington, D. C. 20503, Attention: Desk Officer for EPA. Please include the EPA Docket ID Number OECA 2005 0025 and OMB Control Number 2060 0041 in any correspondence.

Part B of the Supporting Statement This part is not applicable because no statistical methods were used in collecting this information. 15 Table 1: Annual Respondent Burden and Cost  NSPS for Sulfuric acid Plants ( 40 CFR Part 60, Subpart H) ( Renewal)

Burden item ( A) Technical Personhours per occurrence ( B)

No. of occurrences per respondent per year ( C) Technical Personhours per respondent per year ( C= AxB) ( D) Respondents per year a ( E) Technical personhours per year ( E= CxD) ( F) Management person hours per year ( Ex0.05) ( G) Clerical personhours per year ( Ex0.1) ( H)

Total Cost per year b 1. Applications N/ A 2. Survey and Studies N/ A 3. Reporting requirements A. Read Instructions c 1 1 1 0 0 0 0 $ 0 B. Required Activities N/ A Initial performance tests d 300 1 300 0 0 0 0 $ 0 Reference Method 9 test e 4 1 4 0 0 0 0 $ 0 Repeat of performance tests f 300 1 300 0 0 0 0 $ 0 C. Create information Included in 3B D. Gather existing information Included in 3B E. Write report Application of construction or modification 2 1 2 0 0 0 0 $ 0 Notification of actual startup 2 1 2 0 0 0 0 $ 0 Notification of physical or operational change 2 1 2 0 0 0 0 $ 0 16 Burden item ( A) Technical Personhours per occurrence ( B)

No. of occurrences per respondent per year ( C) Technical Personhours per respondent per year ( C= AxB) ( D) Respondents per year a ( E) Technical personhours per year ( E= CxD) ( F) Management person hours per year ( Ex0.05) ( G) Clerical personhours per year ( Ex0.1) ( H)

Total Cost per year b Notification of demonstration of continuous monitoring system ( CMS) 2 1 2 0 0 0 0 $ 0 Notification of initial performance test 2 1 2 0 0 0 0 $ 0 Semiannual report of excess emissions g 40 2 80 103 8,240 412 824 $ 764,985.12 4. Recordkeeping Requirements A. Read instructions Included in 3A B. Plan activities Included in 3B C. Implement activities Included in 3B D. Develop record system N/ A E. Time to enter information Records of operating parameters h 0.25 350 88 103 9,064 453.2 906.4 $ 841,483.63 Record of conversion factors/

calculation i 0.05 1,050 53 103 5,459 272.95 545.9 $ 506,802.64 F. Time to train personnel N/ A G. Time for audits N/ A Subtotal Labor Burden 22,763 1,138.15 2,276.3 $ 2,113,271.39 TOTAL LABOR BURDEN AND COST ( rounded) 26,177 $ 2,113,271 17 Assumptions:

a We have assumed that there are 103 existing sources, and that no additional new sources will become subject to the rule over the next three years.

b This ICR uses the following labor rates: $ 97.46 per hour for Executive, Administrative, and Managerial labor; $ 83.71 per hour for Technical labor, and $ 42.55 per hour for Clerical labor. These rates are from the United States Department of Labor, Bureau of Labor Statistics, March 19, 2005, " Table 2. Civilian Workers, by occupational and industry group." The rates are from column 1, " Total compensation." The rates have been increased by 110% to account for the benefit packages available to those employed by private industry.

c We have assumed that it will take one hour to read instructions.

d We have assumed that it will take 300 hours to complete an initial performance test.

e We have assumed that it will take four hours to complete a reference method 9 test.

f We have assumed that it will take 300 hours to repeat the test due to failure.

g We have assumed that it will take forty hours to write an excess emission report on a semiannual basis.

h We have assumed that each respondents will enter information on records of operating parameters 350 time per year.

i We have assumed that records of conversion factors will be recorded three times daily at 350 days per year for a total of 3x350= 1,050 times per year. 18 Table 2: Average Annual EPA Burden  NSPS for Sulfuric acid Plants ( 40 CFR Part 60, Subpart H) ( Renewal)

Burden item ( A) Technical Person Hours Per Occurrenc e ( B) Number of Occurrence s Per Year ( C) Technical Person Hours Per Plant Per Year ( C= AxB) ( D) Plants Per Year a ( E) Technical Hours Per Year ( E= CxD) ( F) Management Hours Per Year ( F= 0.05xE) ( G) Clerical Hours Per Year ( G= 0.1xE) ( H) Total Cost,

Per Yearb New Facility Initial performance tests c 50 1 50 0 0 0 0 $ 0 Repeat performance test / observed d 24 1 24 0 0 0 0 $ 0 Review reports Notification of construction 2 1 2 0 0 0 0 $ 0 Notification of actual startup 0.5 1 0.5 0 0 0 0 $ 0 Notification of initial test 0.5 1.2 0.6 0 0 0 0 $ 0 Review test results 8 1.2 9.6 0 0 0 0 $ 0 Notification of CMS demonstration 0.5 1 0.5 0 0 0 0 $ 0 19 Burden item ( A) Technical Person Hours Per Occurrenc e ( B) Number of Occurrence s Per Year ( C) Technical Person Hours Per Plant Per Year ( C= AxB) ( D) Plants Per Year a ( E) Technical Hours Per Year ( E= CxD) ( F) Management Hours Per Year ( F= 0.05xE) ( G) Clerical Hours Per Year ( G= 0.1xE) ( H) Total Cost,

Per Yearb Existing Facility 0.5 1 0.5 0 0 0 0 $ 0 Excess emission reports e 4 2 8 103 824 41.2 82.4 $ 38,415.7 0 Subtotals Labor Burden and Cost 824 41.2 82.4 $ 38,415.7 0 TOTAL LABOR BURDEN AND COST ( rounded) 948 $ 38,416 Assumptions:

a We have assumed that there are 103 existing sources, and that no additional new sources will become subject to the rule over the next three years.

b This cost is based on the following hourly labor rates times a 1.6 benefits multiplication factor to account for government overhead expenses: $ 56.02 for Managerial ( GS 13,

Step 5, $ 35.01 x 1.6), $ 41.57 for Technical ( GS 12, Step 1, $ 25.98 x 1.6) and $ 22.50 Clerical ( GS 6, Step 3, $ 14.06 x 1.6). These rates are from the Office of Personnel Management ( OPM) " 2005 General Schedule" which excludes locality rates of pay.

c We have assumed that it will take fifty hours to perform initial performance test.

d We have assumed that it will take twenty four hours to repeat performance test.

e We have assumed that it will take four hours per respondent to review excess emission reports on a semiannual basis.