[Federal Register: October 29, 2007 (Volume 72, Number 208)]
[Notices]
[Page 61204]
[DOCID:fr29oc07-112]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION

Federal Aviation Administration

Notice of Intent To Rule on Request To Release Airport Property
at Seattle Tacoma International Airport, Seattle, WA

AGENCY: Federal Aviation Administration (FAA), DOT.

ACTION:  Notice of intent to release airport property.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The FAA proposes to rule and invite public comment on the
release of land at Seattle Tacoma International Airport under the
provisions of Section 125 of the Wendell H. Ford Aviation Investment
Reform Act for the 21st Century (AIR 21).

DATES: Comments must be received on or before November 28, 2007.

ADDRESSES: Comments on this application may be mailed or delivered to
the FAA at the following address: Federal Aviation Administration, 1601
Lind Ave., SW., Renton, Washington 98057-3356.
    In addition, one copy of any comments submitted to the FAA must be
mailed or delivered to Mr. Mark Reis, Airport Director, Port of
Seattle, P.O. Box 68727, Seattle, Washington 98409-7322.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Mr. Paul Johnson, Project Manager,
Federal Aviation Administration, Northwest Mountain Region, Airports
Division, Seattle Airports District Office, 1601 Lind Avenue, SW.,
Suite 250, Renton, Washington 98057-3356.
    This request to release property may be reviewed in person at this
same location, by appointment.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The FAA invites public comment on the
request to release property at the Seattle Tacoma International
Airport, under the provisions of the AIR 21.
    The Port of Seattle requests the release of 24.6 acres of airport
property to the Washington Department of Transportation (WSDOT) needed
for their SR 509 project alignment in exchange for 24.08 acres of WSDOT
property. WSDOT has identified these properties as essential for the
alignment of the planned SR 509 extension and desires to enter into an
exchange agreement for land it owns near the airport.
    Any person may inspect the request in person at the FAA office
listed above under: FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT.
    In addition, any person may, upon request, inspect the application,
notice and other documents germane to the application, in person at the
Port of Seattle, Acquisition and Relocation Office, 19639 28th Ave.,
S., Bldg. E, SeaTac, Washington 98118-16715.

    Issued in Renton, Washington on October 9, 2007.
Paul Johnson,
Compliance Specialist, Seattle Airports District Office.
[FR Doc. 07-5323 Filed 10-26-07; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4910-13-M


[Federal Register: May 1, 2007 (Volume 72, Number 83)]
[Notices]
[Page 23811]
[DOCID:fr01my07-53]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission

[Docket No. ER04-1027-000]

Rocky Mountain Power, Inc.; Notice of Issuance of Order

April 24, 2007.
    Rocky Mountain Power, Inc. (Rocky Mountain) filed an application
for market-based rate authority, with an accompanying tariff. The
proposed market-based rate tariff provides for the sale of capacity and
energy at market-based rates. Rocky Mountain also requested waivers of
various Commission regulations. In particular, Rocky Mountain requested
that the Commission grant blanket approval under 18 CFR part 34 of all
future issuances of securities and assumptions of liability by Rocky
Mountain.
    On September 3, 2004, pursuant to delegated authority, the
Director, Division of Tariffs and Market Development--West, granted the
requests for blanket approval under part 34 (Director's Order). The
Director's Order also stated that the Commission would publish a
separate notice in the Federal Register establishing a period of time
for the filing of protests. Accordingly, any person desiring to be
heard concerning the blanket approvals of issuances of securities or
assumptions of liability by Rocky Mountain should file a protest with
the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission, 888 First Street, NE.,
Washington, DC 20426, in accordance with Rules 211 and 214 of the
Commission's Rules of Practice and Procedure. 18 CFR 385.211, 385.214
(2004).
    Notice is hereby given that the deadline for filing protests is May
23, 2007.
    Absent a request to be heard in opposition to such blanket
approvals by the deadline above, Rocky Mountain is authorized to issue
securities and assume obligations or liabilities as a guarantor,
indorser, surety, or otherwise in respect of any security of another
person; provided that such issuance or assumption is for some lawful
object within the corporate purposes of Rocky Mountain, compatible with
the public interest, and is reasonably necessary or appropriate for
such purposes.
    The Commission reserves the right to require a further showing that
neither public nor private interests will be adversely affected by
continued approvals of Rocky Mountain's issuance of securities or
assumptions of liability.
    Copies of the full text of the Director's Order are available from
the Commission's Public Reference Room, 888 First Street, NE.,
Washington, DC 20426. The Order may also be viewed on the Commission's
Web site at http://www.ferc.gov, using the eLibrary link. Enter the

docket number excluding the last three digits in the docket number
filed to access the document. Comments, protests, and interventions may
be filed electronically via the Internet in lieu of paper. See, 18 CFR
385.2001(a)(1)(iii) and the instructions on the Commission's Web site
under the ``e-Filing'' link. The Commission strongly encourages
electronic filings.

Kimberly D. Bose,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. E7-8212 Filed 4-30-07; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 6717-01-P


[Federal Register: December 23, 2009 (Volume 74, Number 245)]
[Notices]
[Page 68264]
[DOCID:fr23de09-56]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission

[Docket No. ER10-401-000]

Asset Energy Cost Savings Cooperative, L.L.C.; Supplemental
Notice That Initial Market-Based Rate Filing Includes Request for
Blanket Section 204 Authorization

December 16, 2009.
    This is a supplemental notice in the above-referenced proceeding of
Asset Energy Cost Savings Cooperative, L.L.C.'s application for market-
based rate authority, with an accompanying rate tariff, noting that
such application includes a request for blanket authorization, under 18
CFR Part 34, of future issuances of securities and assumptions of
liability.
    Any person desiring to intervene or to protest should file with the
Federal Energy Regulatory Commission, 888 First Street, NE.,
Washington, DC 20426, in accordance with Rules 211 and 214 of the
Commission's Rules of Practice and Procedure (18 CFR 385.211 and
385.214). Anyone filing a motion to intervene or protest must serve a
copy of that document on the Applicant.
    Notice is hereby given that the deadline for filing protests with
regard to the applicant's request for blanket authorization, under 18
CFR Part 34, of future issuances of securities and assumptions of
liability, is January 5, 2010.
    The Commission encourages electronic submission of protests and
interventions in lieu of paper, using the FERC Online links at http://
www.ferc.gov. To facilitate electronic service, persons with Internet
access who will eFile a document and/or be listed as a contact for an
intervenor must create and validate an eRegistration account using the
eRegistration link. Select the eFiling link to log on and submit the
intervention or protests.
    Persons unable to file electronically should submit an original and
14 copies of the intervention or protest to the Federal Energy
Regulatory Commission, 888 First Street, NE., Washington, DC 20426.
    The filings in the above-referenced proceeding are accessible in
the Commission's eLibrary system by clicking on the appropriate link in
the above list.
    They are also available for review in the Commission's Public
Reference Room in Washington, DC. There is an eSubscription link on the
Web site that enables subscribers to receive e-mail notification when a
document is added to a subscribed docket(s). For assistance with any
FERC Online service, please e-mail<EMAIL_ADDRESS>or call
(866) 208-3676 (toll free). For TTY, call<PHONE_NUMBER>.

Kimberly D. Bose,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. E9-30460 Filed 12-22-09; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 6717-01-P


[Federal Register Volume 82, Number 32 (Friday, February 17, 2017)]
[Notices]
[Pages 11087-11089]
[FR Doc No: 2017-03182]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

[Release No. 34-80031; File No. SR-C2-2017-008]

Self-Regulatory Organizations; C2 Options Exchange, Incorporated;
Notice of Filing and Immediate Effectiveness of a Proposed Rule To
Amend the Fees Schedule

February 13, 2017.
    Pursuant to Section 19(b)(1) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934
(the ``Act''),\1\ and Rule 19b-4 thereunder,\2\ notice is hereby given
that on February 1, 2017, C2 Options Exchange, Incorporated (the
``Exchange'' or ``C2'') filed with the Securities and Exchange
Commission (the ``Commission'') the proposed rule change as described
in Items I, II, and III below, which Items have been prepared by the
Exchange. The Commission is publishing this notice to solicit comments
on the proposed rule change from interested persons.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \1\ 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(1).
    \2\ 17 CFR 240.19b-4.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

I. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement of the Terms of Substance
of the Proposed Rule Change

    The Exchange proposes to amend its Fees Schedule. The text of the
proposed rule change is available on the Exchange's Web site (http://www.c2exchange.com/Legal/), at the Exchange's Office of the Secretary,
and at the Commission's Public Reference Room.

II. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement of the Purpose of, and
Statutory Basis for, the Proposed Rule Change

    In its filing with the Commission, the Exchange included statements
concerning the purpose of and basis for the proposed rule change and
discussed any comments it received on the proposed rule change. The
text of these statements may be examined at the places specified in
Item IV below. The Exchange has prepared summaries, set forth in
sections A, B, and C below, of the most significant aspects of such
statements.

A. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement of the Purpose of, and
Statutory Basis for, the Proposed Rule Change

1. Purpose
    The Exchange proposes to amend its Fees Schedule. The Exchange is
changing fees for functionality related to its PULSe workstation. The
fees herein will be effective on February 1, 2017.
    By way of background, the PULSe workstation is a front-end order
entry system designed for use with respect to orders that may be sent
to the trading systems of the Exchange. Exchange Trading Permit Holders
(``TPHs'') may also make workstations available to their customers,
which may include TPHs, non-broker dealer public customers and non-TPH
broker dealers.
Drop Copies
    Financial Information eXchange (``FIX'') language-based
connectivity, upon request, provides customers (both TPH and non-TPH)
of TPHs that are brokers and PULSe users (``PULSe brokers'') with the
ability to receive ``drop-copy'' order fill messages from their PULSe
brokers. These fill messages allow customers to update positions, risk
calculations and streamline back-office functions.
    The Exchange is proposing reducing the monthly fee to be assessed
on TPHs who are either receiving or sending drop copies via a PULSe
workstation.

Whether the drop copy sender or receiver is assessed the fee is
dependent upon whether the customer receiving the drop copies is a TPH
or non-TPH.
    If a customer receiving drop copies is a TPH, that TPH customer
(the receiving TPH) will be now be charged a fee of $425 per month
(down from $1000 per month), per PULSe broker from whom it receives
drop copies via PULSe. For example, if TPH customer A receives drop
copies from each of PULSe broker A, PULSe broker B, and PULSe broker C
(all of which are TPHs), TPH A (the receiving TPH) will be charged a
fee of $1275 per month for receiving drop copies via PULSe from PULSe
brokers A, B and C (the sending TPHs).
    If a customer receiving drop copies is a non-TPH, the PULSe broker
(the sending TPH) who sends drop copies via PULSe to that customer will
now be charged a fee of $400 per month (down from $500 per month). If
that PULSe broker sends drop copies via PULSe to multiple non-TPH
customers, the PULSe broker will be charged the fee for each customer.
For example, if PULSe broker A sends drop copies via its PULSe
workstation to each of non-TPH customer A, non-TPH customer B and non-
TPH customer C, PULSe broker A (the sending TPH) will be charged a fee
of $1200 per month for drop copies it sends via PULSe to non-TPH
customers A, B and C (the receiving non-TPHs).
``OATS Reports'' to ``Equity Order Reports''
    The Exchange is proposing to change the name of its fee relating to
OATS Reports to ``Equity Order Reports''. The Equity Order Reports
related to this fee are provided for a PULSe users own use. Electing to
receive these reports does not currently and will not fulfill any PULSe
users' OATS reporting obligations. The change will eliminate any
potential confusion as to whether the Exchange itself or the PULSe
system is able to fulfill any OATS reporting obligation for a PULSe
user. Neither the content of the reports nor the manner in which they
are received from PULSe is changing.
2. Statutory Basis
    The Exchange believes the proposed rule change is consistent with
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (the ``Act'') and the rules and
regulations thereunder applicable to the Exchange and, in particular,
the requirements of Section 6(b) of the Act.\3\ Specifically, the
Exchange believes the proposed rule change is consistent with the
Section 6(b)(5) \4\ requirements that the rules of an exchange be
designed to prevent fraudulent and manipulative acts and practices, to
promote just and equitable principles of trade, to foster cooperation
and coordination with persons engaged in regulating, clearing,
settling, processing information with respect to, and facilitating
transactions in securities, to remove impediments to and perfect the
mechanism of a free and open market and a national market system, and,
in general, to protect investors and the public interest. Additionally,
the Exchange believes the proposed rule change is consistent with
Section 6(b)(4) of the Act,\5\ which requires that Exchange rules
provide for the equitable allocation of reasonable dues, fees, and
other charges among its Trading Permit Holders and other persons using
its facilities.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \3\ 15 U.S.C. 78f(b).
    \4\ 15 U.S.C. 78f(b)(5).
    \5\ 15 U.S.C. 78f(b)(4).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    The Exchange believes that lowering the $1000 per month fee to $425
per month on a TPH receiving drop copies from PULSe is reasonable
because the reduced fee will continue to allow the Exchange to monitor,
develop and implement upgrade, maintain and customize PULSe to ensure
the TPH customer receives timely and accurate drop copies while also
reducing TPH customers' costs. The Exchange believes the fee is
equitable and not unfairly discriminatory because the monthly fee is
assessed to any TPH electing to receive drop copies from a PULSe
broker. Use of the drop copy functionality by a TPH customer is
voluntary.
    The Exchange believes that lowering the $500 per month fee to $400
per month on a TPH sending drop copies from PULSe to a non-TPH customer
is reasonable because the reduced fee will continue to allow the
Exchange to monitor, develop and implement upgrades, maintain and
customize PULSe to ensure a non-TPH customer receives timely and
accurate drop copies while also reducing the sending TPH's costs. The
Exchange believes the fee is equitable and not unfairly discriminatory
because the monthly fee is assessed equally to any TPH sending drop
copies to its non-TPH customers. The Exchange believes that assessing a
TPH sending drop copies to a non-TPH a monthly fee of $400, as opposed
to the $425 per month rate assessed to TPH customers receiving drop
copies from PULSe, is reasonable, equitable, and not unfairly
discriminatory. Specially, the lower rates are designed to encourage
non-TPH market participants to interact with the Exchange, which will
accordingly attract more volume and liquidity to the Exchange and
benefit all Exchange participants through increased opportunities to
trade. Use of the drop copy functionality by a non-TPH customer is
voluntary.
    The Exchange believes that changing the name of the ``OATS
reporting'' fee to ``Equity Order Reports'' alleviates potential
confusion and maintains clarity in the Fees Schedule, which removes
impediments to and perfects the mechanism of a free and open market and
a national market system, and, in general, protects investors and the
public interest.

B. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement on Burden on Competition

    The Exchange does not believe that the proposed rule changes will
impose any burdens on competition that are not necessary or appropriate
in furtherance of the purposes of the Act. The Exchange does not
believe that the proposed rule change will impose any burden on
intramarket competition that is not necessary or appropriate in
furtherance of the purposes of the Act because the proposed PULSe-
related fees relate to optional reports and/or functionality and are
assessed equally on PULSe users or TPH electing to use the
functionality and/or receive the reports. The Exchange does not believe
that the proposed change will cause any unnecessary burden on
intermarket competition because the proposed fees relate to use of an
Exchange-provided order entry system. To the extent that any proposed
change makes the Exchange a more attractive marketplace for market
participants at other exchanges, such market participants are welcome
to become Exchange market participants.

C. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement on Comments on the Proposed
Rule Change Received From Members, Participants, or Others

    The Exchange neither solicited nor received comments on the
proposed rule change.

III. Date of Effectiveness of the Proposed Rule Change and Timing for
Commission Action

    The foregoing rule change has become effective pursuant to Section
19(b)(3)(A) of the Act \6\ and paragraph (f) of Rule 19b-4 \7\
thereunder. At any time within 60 days of the filing of the proposed
rule change, the Commission summarily may temporarily suspend such rule
change if it appears to the Commission that such

action is necessary or appropriate in the public interest, for the
protection of investors, or otherwise in furtherance of the purposes of
the Act. If the Commission takes such action, the Commission will
institute proceedings to determine whether the proposed rule change
should be approved or disapproved.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \6\ 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(3)(A).
    \7\ 17 CFR 240.19b-4(f).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

IV. Solicitation of Comments

    Interested persons are invited to submit written data, views, and
arguments concerning the foregoing, including whether the proposed rule
change is consistent with the Act. Comments may be submitted by any of
the following methods:

Electronic Comments

     Use the Commission's Internet comment form (http://www.sec.gov/rules/sro.shtml); or
     Send an email to<EMAIL_ADDRESS>Please include
File Number SR-C2-2017-008 on the subject line.

Paper Comments

     Send paper comments in triplicate to Secretary, Securities
and Exchange Commission, 100 F Street NE., Washington, DC 20549-1090.

All submissions should refer to File Number SR-C2-2017-008. This file
number should be included on the subject line if email is used. To help
the Commission process and review your comments more efficiently,
please use only one method. The Commission will post all comments on
the Commission's Internet Web site (http://www.sec.gov/rules/sro.shtml). Copies of the submission, all subsequent amendments, all
written statements with respect to the proposed rule change that are
filed with the Commission, and all written communications relating to
the proposed rule change between the Commission and any person, other
than those that may be withheld from the public in accordance with the
provisions of 5 U.S.C. 552, will be available for Web site viewing and
printing in the Commission's Public Reference Room, 100 F Street NE.,
Washington, DC 20549, on official business days between the hours of
10:00 a.m. and 3:00 p.m. Copies of the filing also will be available
for inspection and copying at the principal office of the Exchange. All
comments received will be posted without change; the Commission does
not edit personal identifying information from submissions. You should
submit only information that you wish to make available publicly. All
submissions should refer to File Number SR-C2-2017-008 and should be
submitted on or before March 10, 2017.

    For the Commission, by the Division of Trading and Markets,
pursuant to delegated authority.\8\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \8\ 17 CFR 200.30-3(a)(12).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

Eduardo A. Aleman,
Assistant Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2017-03182 Filed 2-16-17; 8:45 am]
 BILLING CODE 8011-01-P


[Federal Register Volume 87, Number 232 (Monday, December 5, 2022)]
[Proposed Rules]
[Pages 74332-74334]
[FR Doc No: 2022-26372]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION

Federal Aviation Administration

14 CFR Part 71

[Docket No. FAA-2022-1505; Airspace Docket No. 22-ASO-26]
RIN 2120-AA66

Proposed Establishment of Class E Airspace and Proposed Amendment
of Class E Airspace; Dallas, GA

AGENCY: Federal Aviation Administration (FAA), DOT.

ACTION: Notice of proposed rulemaking (NPRM).

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: This action proposes to establish Class E surface airspace for
Paulding Northwest Atlanta Airport (new name), Dallas, GA, as the
airport now qualifies for surface airspace, and amend Class E airspace
extending upward from 700 feet above the surface by increasing the
airport radius and updating the airport's name. Controlled airspace is
necessary for the safety and management of instrument flight rules
(IFR) operations in the area.

DATES: Comments must be received on or before January 19, 2023.

ADDRESSES: Send comments on this proposal to: the U.S. Department of
Transportation, Docket Operations, 1200

New Jersey Avenue SE, West Building Ground Floor, Room W12-140,
Washington, DC 20590-0001; Telephone:<PHONE_NUMBER>, or (202) 366-
9826. You must identify Docket No. FAA-2022-1505; Airspace Docket No.
22-ASO-26 at the beginning of your comments. You may also submit
comments through the internet at www.regulations.gov.
    FAA Order JO 7400.11G Airspace Designations and Reporting Points
and subsequent amendments can be viewed online at www.faa.gov/air_traffic/publications/. For further information, contact the
Airspace Policy Group, Federal Aviation Administration, 800
Independence Avenue SW, Washington, DC 20591; Telephone: (202) 267-
8783.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: John Fornito, Operations Support
Group, Eastern Service Center, Federal Aviation Administration, 1701
Columbia Avenue, College Park, GA 30337; Telephone:<PHONE_NUMBER>.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

Authority for This Rulemaking

    The FAA's authority to issue rules regarding aviation safety is
found in Title 49 of the United States Code. Subtitle I, Section 106
describes the authority of the FAA Administrator. Subtitle VII,
Aviation Programs, describes in more detail the scope of the agency's
authority. This rulemaking is promulgated under the authority described
in Subtitle VII, Part A, Subpart I, Section 40103. Under that section,
the FAA is charged with prescribing regulations to assign the use of
airspace necessary to ensure the safety of aircraft and the efficient
use of airspace. This regulation is within the scope of that authority,
as it would establish and amend airspace in Dallas, GA, to support IFR
operations in the area.

Comments Invited

    Interested persons are invited to comment on this proposed
rulemaking by submitting such written data, views, or arguments as they
may desire. Comments that provide the factual basis supporting the
views and suggestions presented are particularly helpful in developing
reasoned regulatory decisions on the proposal. Comments are
specifically invited on the overall regulatory, aeronautical, economic,
environmental, and energy-related aspects of the proposal.
    Communications should identify both docket numbers (Docket No. FAA-
2022-1505 and Airspace Docket No. 22-ASO-26) and be submitted in
triplicate to DOT Docket Operations (see ADDRESSES section for the
address and phone number). You may also submit comments through the
internet at www.regulations.gov.
    Persons wishing the FAA to acknowledge receipt of their comments on
this action must submit with those comments a self-addressed stamped
postcard on which the following statement is made: ``Comments to FAA
Docket No. FAA-2022-1505; Airspace Docket No. 22-ASO-26.'' The postcard
will be dated/time stamped and returned to the commenter.
    All communications received before the specified closing date for
comments will be considered before taking action on the proposed rule.
The proposal contained in this document may be changed in light of the
comments received. All comments submitted will be available for
examination in the public docket both before and after the comment
closing date. A report summarizing each substantive public contact with
FAA personnel concerned with this rulemaking will be filed in the
docket.

Availability of NPRMs

    An electronic copy of this document may be downloaded through the
internet at www.regulations.gov. Recently published rulemaking
documents can also be accessed through the FAA's web page at
www.faa.gov/air_traffic/publications/airspace_amendments/.
    You may review the public docket containing the proposal, any
comments received and any final disposition in person in the Dockets
Office (see the ADDRESSES section for address and phone number) between
9:00 a.m. and 5:00 p.m., Monday through Friday, except federal
holidays. An informal docket may also be examined between 8:00 a.m. and
4:30 p.m., Monday through Friday, except for federal holidays at the
office of the Eastern Service Center, Federal Aviation Administration,
Room 350,1701 Columbia Avenue, College Park, GA 30337.

Availability and Summary of Documents for Incorporation by Reference

    This document proposes to amend FAA Order JO 7400.11G, Airspace
Designations and Reporting Points, dated August 19, 2022, and effective
September 15, 2022. FAA Order JO 7400.11G is publicly available as
listed in the ADDRESSES section of this document. FAA Order JO 7400.11G
lists Class A, B, C, D, and E airspace areas, air traffic service
routes, and reporting points.

The Proposal

    The FAA proposes an amendment to 14 CFR part 71 to establish Class
E surface airspace for Paulding Northwest Atlanta Airport, Dallas, GA,
to accommodate aircraft landing and departing this airport. Also, this
action would amend Class E airspace extending upward from 700 feet
above the surface for Paulding Northwest Atlanta Airport (formerly
Paulding County Regional Airport) by increasing the radius to 7 miles
(from 6.5 miles) and updating the airport's name.
    Class E airspace designations are published in Paragraphs 6002 and
6005, respectively, of FAA Order JO 7400.11G, dated August 19, 2022,
and effective September 15, 2022, which is incorporated by reference in
14 CFR 71.1. The Class E airspace designations listed in this document
will be published subsequently in FAA Order JO 7400.11.
    FAA Order JO 7400.11, Airspace Designations and Reporting Points,
is published yearly and effective on September 15.

Regulatory Notices and Analyses

    The FAA has determined that this proposed regulation only involves
an established body of technical regulations for which frequent and
routine amendments are necessary to keep them operationally current.
It, therefore: (1) is not a ``significant regulatory action'' under
Executive Order 12866; (2) is not a ``significant rule'' under DOT
Regulatory Policies and Procedures (44 FR 11034; February 26, 1979);
and (3) does not warrant preparation of a Regulatory Evaluation as the
anticipated impact is so minimal. Since this is a routine matter that
will only affect air traffic procedures and air navigation, it is
certified that this proposed rule, when promulgated, will not have a
significant economic impact on a substantial number of small entities
under the criteria of the Regulatory Flexibility Act.

Environmental Review

    This proposal will be subject to an environmental analysis in
accordance with FAA Order 1050.1F, ``Environmental Impacts: Policies
and Procedures,'' prior to any FAA final regulatory action.

Lists of Subjects in 14 CFR Part 71

    Airspace, Incorporation by reference, Navigation (air).

The Proposed Amendment

    In consideration of the foregoing, the Federal Aviation
Administration

proposes to amend 14 CFR part 71 as follows:

PART 71--DESIGNATION OF CLASS A, B, C, D, AND E AIRSPACE AREAS; AIR
TRAFFIC SERVICE ROUTES; AND REPORTING POINTS

0
1. The authority citation for part 71 continues to read as follows:

    Authority:  49 U.S.C. 106(f), 106(g); 40103, 40113, 40120; E.O.
10854, 24 FR 9565, 3 CFR, 1959-1963 Comp., p. 389.

Sec.  71.1   [Amended]

0
2. The incorporation by reference in 14 CFR 71.1 of Federal Aviation
Administration Order JO 7400.11G, Airspace Designations and Reporting
Points, dated August 19, 2022, and effective September 15, 2022, is
amended as follows:

Paragraph 6002 Class E Surface Airspace.

* * * * *

ASO GA E2 Dallas, GA [Established]

Paulding Northwest Atlanta Airport, GA
    (Lat. 33[deg]54'43'' N, long. 84[deg]56'26'' W)

    That airspace extending upward from the surface within a 4.5-
mile radius of the Paulding Northwest Atlanta Airport.

Paragraph 6005 Class E Airspace Areas Extending Upward From 700
Feet or More Above the Surface of the Earth.

* * * * *

ASO GA E5 Dallas, GA [Amended

Paulding Northwest Atlanta Airport, GA
    (Lat. 33[deg]54'43'' N, long. 84[deg]56'26'' W)

    That airspace extending upward from 700 feet above the surface
of the Earth within a 7-mile radius of the Paulding Northwest
Atlanta Airport.

    Issued in College Park, Georgia, on November 29, 2022.
Andreese C. Davis,
Manager, Airspace & Procedures Team South, Eastern Service Center, Air
Traffic Organization.
[FR Doc. 2022-26372 Filed 12-2-22; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910-13-P


Date:		May 2012

Subject:	Secondary Impact Analysis -- SCR
		Nitric Acid NSPS Review
      EPA Contract No. EP-D-11-084; Work Assignment No. 0-01
        RTI Project No. 02103199.000.001

From:			Melissa Icenhour

To:			Nathan Topham
        OAQPS/SPPD/MICG (D243-02)
        U. S. Environmental Protection Agency
      Research Triangle Park, NC  27711

As part of the NSPS Review for Nitric Acid Plants, it is estimated that 5 newly constructed nitric acid production units and 1 modified nitric acid production unit will become subject to the regulation in the next five years. See memo entitled Impacts of Nitric Acid NSPS Review -- NOX (Updated Memo for Final NSPS) dated May 2012 in Docket No. EPA-HQ-OAR-2010-0750.

The purpose of this memo is to estimate the secondary impacts of installing a selective catalytic reduction (SCR) control device on the modified production unit. The SCR will ensure that the modified source is able to meet the final emission rate of 0.50 lb nitrogen oxides (NOX) per ton 100% nitric acid (0.50 lb NOX/ton acid) under Part 60, Subpart Ga.

The secondary impacts from the installation of an SCR include an increase in facility operating costs due to the increased electricity needed to operate the SCR. The increased electricity use leads to an increase in air pollutants such as NOX, sulfur dioxide (SO2), and carbon dioxide (CO2).

There is no known power equation specific to an SCR used to control NOX emissions from a nitric acid production train. However, according to EPA's Air Pollution Control Cost Manual -  -  (EPA Cost Manual), the amount of power consumed by an SCR used to control emissions from a utility boiler can be estimated using the following equation:

      P=0.105*QBNOXin ηNOX+0.5ΔPduct+ ntotalΔPcatalyst  		Eq. 1

where:
P 	=	power (kW)
QB 	=	boiler heat input (MMBtu/hr)
NOXin 	= 	concentration of NOX into the SCR (lb NOX/MMBtu)
ηNOX 	=	destruction efficiency of the SCR
ΔPduct 	=	pressure drop across ductwork (inches H2O)
ntotal 	=	number of layers in the SCR
ΔPcatalyst 	=	pressure drop across catalyst (inches H2O)

Equation 1 can be used to estimate the power requirement for an SCR installed on a nitric acid production train if we make some assumptions about the content of the gas entering the SCR.
According to EPA Method 19, the molar heat content of natural gas is 8,710 dry standard cubic feet (dscf) per million Btu (MMBtu).
According to the ICR from Agrium North Bend, the flow rate is 24,734 standard cubic feet per minute (scfm). Assuming minimal moisture content, this is 1,484,040 dscf per hour. Also according to the ICR, the SCR at the Agrium North Bend plant has 6 catalyst layers.
Table 1 contains actual data compiled by CRI Catalyst Company to show how much pressure drop is associated with the ductwork connecting the SCR to the emission stream. The average pressure drop is 7 inches H2O.
Using Equation 1, the power required to operate the SCR is 123.46 kilowatts (kW).
According to the EPA Cost Manual, the cost of electricity is directly related to the amount of power required to the run the SCR, as shown by Equation 2.

		C=P*EP*OpHours							Eq. 2

where:
C	=	cost of electricity ($)
P 	=	power (kW)
EP	=	price of electricity ($/kWh)
OpHours	=	number of hours the plant operates the SCR during the year (hours)

According to the ICR, the plant operates 8,200 hours per year. The plant is operating in Ohio and according to this website (http://www.electricchoice.com/electricity-prices-by-state.php), the industrial cost of electricity was 6.06 cents per kilowatt-hour (kWh) in 2010.

Using Equation 2, the cost of electricity to operate the SCR is $61,352 per year.

According to this website (http://www.cleanerandgreener.org/resources/pollutioncalculator.html), electricity use results in the creation of other air pollutants including NOX, sulfur dioxide (SO2), carbon dioxide (CO2), methane (CH4), and nitrous oxide (N2O).

Using the known inputs for Equation 1 and Equation 2, shown in Table 2, the secondary impacts of this SCR are shown in Table 3.

As described in the preamble to this final rule, the secondary impacts are minimal.

Table 1. Pressure Drop Across SCR units at Nitric Acid Plants
                                     Start
                                    Country
                               Capacity (mt/day)
                                    Process
                               Flue gas (Nm3/hr)
                                     Temp
                                     (C )
                                Pressure (bar)
                                 NOX in (ppmv)
                                NOX out (ppmv)
                                NH3 out (ppmv)
                                   PD (mbar)
                                      PD
                                  (inch H2O)
                                                                           1995
South Africa
                                                                            550
Krupp Uhde
                                                                             70
                                                                            205
                                                                              1
                                                                           1500
                                                                            200
                                                                             35

                                                                           1998
Denmark
                                                                            225
Krupp Uhde
                                                                             30
                                                                            210
                                                                              3
                                                                           1200
                                                                            200
                                                                             10
                                                                             30
                                                                             12
                                                                           1999
USA
                                                                            200
Grand Paroisse
                                                                             27
                                                                            190
                                                                              6
                                                                           2000
                                                                             80
                                                                             30
                                                                              5
                                                                              2
                                                                           1999
USA
                                                                            100
Weatherly
                                                                         14,000
                                                                            166
                                                                              1
                                                                           2100
                                                                            100
                                                                             10
                                                                             20
                                                                              8
                                                                           1999
USA
                                                                            200
Girdler
                                                                           27.5
                                                                            229
                                                                              1
                                                                           4800
                                                                            400
                                                                             30
                                                                             20
                                                                              8
                                                                           1999
USA
                                                                            180

                                                                           21.5
450 - 515
                                                                              6
                                                                           3400
                                                                            100
                                                                             20

                                                                           1999
Malaysia

Cominco
                                                                         31,500
                                                                            477
                                                                              6
                                                                           1300
                                                                            130
-

                                                                           2000
Taiwan

Stamicarbon
                                                                         46,000
                                                                            187
6,2
                                                                           1200
                                                                            100
                                                                             35

                                                                           2000
India

Stamicarbon
                                                                          8,100
                                                                            200
                                                                              1
                                                                           4000
                                                                            100
                                                                            175
                                                                             10
                                                                              4
                                                                           2000
Spain
                                                                            370
Espindesa
                                                                             50
                                                                            220
3,5
                                                                           4000
                                                                            200
                                                                              5

                                                                           2001
Netherlands
                                                                           2000
Grand Paroisse
                                                                            260
                                                                            265
10,4
                                                                            250
                                                                             32
                                                                              5
                                                                             10
                                                                              4
                                                                           2003
Netherlands
                                                                           1700
Grand Paroisse
                                                                        210,000
                                                                            340
                                                                              9
                                                                            250
                                                                             32
                                                                              5
                                                                             10
                                                                              4
                                                                           2001
UK
                                                                            825
Krupp Uhde
                                                                            107
                                                                            225
6,5
                                                                           1000
                                                                             50
                                                                              5
                                                                             25
                                                                             10
                                                                           2001
UK
                                                                           1100
Krupp Uhde
                                                                        145,000
                                                                            380
11,5
                                                                            500
                                                                             50
                                                                              5
                                                                             25
                                                                             10

                                                                        average
                                                                             17
                                                                              7
Information from CRI Catalyst Company
Nitric acid units with Shell DeNOX System
http://www-static.shell.com/static/cri_catalyst/downloads/business/cracker_fun_june2001.pdf

Table 2. Known Values
                                    Element
                                    Source
                                     Value
Molar heat content of natural gas
EPA Method 19; Table 19-2
8,710 dscf/MMBtu
Flow rate of gas entering the SCR
ICR-Agrium North Bend
1,484,040 dscf/hr
Destruction Efficiency of SCR (ηNOX)
Engineering Judgment
0.90
Pressure drop across catalyst (ΔPcatalyst)
EPA Cost Manual
1.0 in H2O per layer
Number of catalyst layers (ntotal)
ICR-Agrium North Bend
6
Pressure drop across the ductwork (ΔPduct)
Table 1
7.0 in H2O
Uncontrolled NOX concentration
Engineering Judgment
500 ppm
Operating hours (OpHours)
ICR-Agrium North Bend
8,200 hours
Price of electricity (EP)
Electricity Choice website
6.06 cents per kWh
NOX emissions from electricity use
Cleaner and Greener website
3.3 lb per 1,000 kW
SO2 emissions from electricity use
Cleaner and Greener website
13.2 lb per 1,000 kW
CO2 emissions from electricity use
Cleaner and Greener website
1,911 lb per 1,000 kW
CH4 emissions from electricity use
Cleaner and Greener website
0.02 lb per 1,000 kW
N2O emissions from electricity use
Cleaner and Greener website
0.03 lb per 1,000 kW

Table 3. Calculated Values
                                    Element
                                    Source
                                     Value
Boiler Heat Input (QB)
(Flow rate of gas entering the SCR) / (Molar heat content of natural gas)

170.4 MMBtu/hr
Power (P)
Equation 1
123.46 kW
Total cost of electricity (C)
Equation 2
$61,400
NOX emissions from operation of SCR
                                                    Cleaner and Greener website
                                                                       0.407 lb
SO2 emissions from operation of SCR
                                                    Cleaner and Greener website
                                                                       1.630 lb
CO2 emissions from operation of SCR
                                                    Cleaner and Greener website
                                                                     235.940 lb
CH4 emissions from operation of SCR
                                                    Cleaner and Greener website
                                                                       0.002 lb
N2O emissions from operation of SCR
                                                    Cleaner and Greener website
                                                                       0.004 lb