[Federal Register Volume 82, Number 209 (Tuesday, October 31, 2017)]
[Notices]
[Pages 50481-50482]
[FR Doc No: 2017-23693]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION

Federal Motor Carrier Safety Administration

[Docket No. FMCSA-2017-0267]

Agency Information Collection Activities; Renewal of an Approved
Information Collection: Motor Carrier Records Change Form

AGENCY: Federal Motor Carrier Safety Administration (FMCSA), DOT.

ACTION: Notice and request for comments.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: In accordance with the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995, FMCSA
announces its plan to submit the Information Collection Request (ICR)
described below to the Office of Management and Budget (OMB) for its
review and approval and invites public comment. The purpose of this ICR
titled ``Motor Carrier Records Change Form,'' is to more efficiently
collect information the Office of Registration and Safety Information
(MC-RS) requires to process name and address changes and reinstatements
of operating authority.

DATES: We must receive your comments on or before January 2, 2018.

ADDRESSES: You may submit comments identified by Federal Docket
Management System (FDMS) Docket Number FMCSA-2017-0267 using any of the
following methods:
     Federal eRulemaking Portal: http://www.regulations.gov.
Follow the online instructions for submitting comments.
     Fax: 1-202-493-2251.
     Mail: Docket Operations; U.S. Department of
Transportation, 1200 New Jersey Avenue SE., West Building, Ground
Floor, Room W12-140, 20590-0001.
     Hand Delivery or Courier: West Building, Ground Floor,
Room W12-140, 1200 New Jersey Avenue SE., Washington, DC, between 9
a.m. and 5 p.m. e.t., Monday through Friday, except Federal holidays.
    Instructions: All submissions must include the Agency name and
docket number. For detailed instructions on submitting comments and
additional information on the exemption process, see the Public
Participation heading below. Note that all comments received will be
posted without change to http://www.regulations.gov, including any
personal information provided. Please see the Privacy Act heading
below.
    Docket: For access to the docket to read background documents or
comments received, go to http://www.regulations.gov, and follow the
online instructions for accessing the dockets, or go to the street
address listed above.
    Privacy Act: Anyone is able to search the electronic form of all
comments received into any of our dockets by the name of the individual
submitting the comment (or signing the comment, if submitted on behalf
of an association, business, labor union, etc.). You may review DOT's
complete Privacy Act Statement for the Federal Docket Management System
published in the Federal Register on January 17, 2008. (73 FR 3316), or
you may visit http://edocket.access.gpo.gov/2008/pdfE8-794.pdf.
    Public Participation: The Federal eRulemaking Portal is available
24 hours each day, 365 days each year. You can obtain electronic
submission and retrieval help and guidelines under the ``help'' section
of the Federal eRulemaking Portal Web site. If you want us to notify
you that we received your comments, please include a self-addressed,
stamped envelope or postcard, or print the acknowledgement page that
appears after submitting comments online. Comments received after the
comment closing date will be included in the docket and will be
considered to the extent practicable.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Jeff Secrist, Division Chief, East-
South Division, FMCSA Office of Registration and Safety Information,
FMCSA, West Building 6th Floor, 1200 New Jersey Avenue SE., Washington,
DC 20590. Telephone:<PHONE_NUMBER>; email [email protected].

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
    Background: FMCSA registers for-hire motor carriers under 49 U.S.C.
13902, surface freight forwarders under 49 U.S.C. 13903, and property
brokers under 49 U.S.C. 13904. Each registration is effective from the
date specified under 49 U.S.C. 13905(c). 49 CFR part 365.413 states
for-hire motor carriers, brokers and freight forwarders are required to
notify MC-RS when they change the name or form of business. Currently,
the name change request can be filed online through the Licensing and
Insurance (L&I) Web site, or companies can fax or mail a letter
requesting either name or address changes. Carriers can also request
reinstatement of a revoked operating authority either via fax or online
via the L&I Web site. About 39% of name change, address change, and
reinstatement requests are received by mail; 38% are filed online; and
23% are filed by faxing a request letter to MC-RS. The information
collected is then entered in the L&I database by FMCSA staff. This
enables FMCSA to maintain up-to-date records so that the agency can
recognize the entity in question in case of enforcement actions or
other procedures required to ensure that the carrier is fit, willing
and able to provide for-hire transportation services, and so that
entities whose authority has been revoked can resume operation if they
are not otherwise blocked from doing so. This multi-purpose form
simplifies the process of gathering the information needed to process
the entities' requests in a timely manner, with the least amount of
effort for all parties involved. This multi-purpose form is filed by
registrants on a voluntary, as-needed basis. This multi-purpose form is
on the FMCSA Web site so entities could access and print/fax/email the
form to MC-RS.
    The form prompts users to report the following data points
(whichever are relevant to their records change request):
    1. What are the legal/doing business as (dba) names of the entity/
representative?
    2. What is the contact information of entity/representatives (phone
number, address, fax number, email address)?
    3. What are the requested changes to name or address of entity?
    4. What is the docket MC/MX/FX number of the entity?
    5. What is the US DOT number of the entity?
    6. Is there any change in ownership, management or control of the
entity?
    7. What kind of changes is the entity making to the company?
    8. Which authority does the entity/representative wish to
reinstate, motor carrier or broker?
    9. Does the entity/representative authorize the fee for the name
change or reinstatement?
    10. Does the entity/representative authorize the reinstatement of
operating authority or name/address change?
    11. What is the credit card information (name, number, expiration
date, address, date) for the card used to pay the fee?
    Title: Motor Carrier Records Change Form.
    OMB Control Number: 2126-0060.
    Type of Request: Renewal collection.
    Respondents: For-hire motor carriers, brokers and freight
forwarders.

    Estimated Number of Respondents: 44,900.
    Estimated Time per Response: 15 minutes per response.
    Expiration Date: July 31, 2018.
    Frequency of Response: On occasion.
    Estimated Total Annual Burden: 11,225 hours [44,900 annual
responses x 0.25 hours = 11,225].
    Public Comments Invited: You are asked to comment on any aspect of
this information collection, including: (1) Whether the proposed
collection is necessary for the performance of FMCSA's functions; (2)
the accuracy of the estimated burden; (3) ways for FMCSA to enhance the
quality, usefulness, and clarity of the collected information; and (4)
ways that the burden could be minimized without reducing the quality of
the collected information. The agency will summarize or include your
comments in the request for OMB's clearance of this information
collection.

    Issued under the authority delegated in 49 CFR 1.87 on: October
24, 2017.
G. Kelly Regal,
Associate Administrator, Office of Research and Information Technology.
[FR Doc. 2017-23693 Filed 10-30-17; 8:45 am]
 BILLING CODE 4910-EX-P


[Federal Register: May 9, 2008 (Volume 73, Number 91)]
[Notices]
[Page 26403-26404]
[DOCID:fr09my08-83]

=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY

Federal Emergency Management Agency

[Docket ID: FEMA-2008-0008]

National Incident Management System--FEMA 501

AGENCY: Federal Emergency Management Agency, DHS.

ACTION: Notice of availability; request for comments.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA) is accepting
comments on the draft National Incident Management System (NIMS)
document. NIMS provides a consistent nationwide template to enable
Federal, State, tribal, and local governments, the private sector, and
nongovernmental organizations to work together to prevent, protect
against, respond to, recover from, and mitigate the effects of
incidents, regardless of cause, size, location, or complexity.

DATES: Comments must be received by June 2, 2008.

ADDRESSES: The draft NIMS document is available online at
www.regulations.gov, in Docket ID FEMA-2008-0008. You may also view
hard copies at the Office of Chief Counsel, Federal Emergency
Management Agency, Room 835, 500 C Street, SW., Washington, DC 20472.
You may submit comments on the draft NIMS document, identified by
Docket ID FEMA-2008-0008, by one of the following methods:
    Federal eRulemaking Portal: http://www.regulations.gov. Follow the
instructions for submitting comments.
    E-mail<EMAIL_ADDRESS>Include Docket ID FEMA-2008-0008 in
the subject line of the message.
    Fax:<PHONE_NUMBER>.
    Mail/Hand Delivery/Courier: Regulation & Policy Team, Office of
Chief Counsel, Federal Emergency Management Agency, Room 835, 500 C
Street, SW., Washington, DC 20472.
    Instructions: All Submissions received must include the agency name
and docket ID. Regardless of the method used for submitting comments or
material, all submissions will be posted, without change, to the
Federal eRulemaking Portal at http://www.regulations.gov, and will
include any personal information you provide. Therefore, submitting
this information makes it public. You may wish to read the Privacy Act
notice that is available on the Privacy and Use Notice link on the
Administration Navigation Bar of www.regulations.gov.
    FEMA has also provided a form, available in the docket at
www.regulations.gov. Due to the large number of comments that are
expected, FEMA asks that comments be submitted using this form.
    Docket: For access to the docket to read background documents or
comments received, go to the Federal eRulemaking Portal at http://
www.regulations.gov and search for Docket ID FEMA-2008-0008. Submitted
comments may also be inspected at FEMA, Office of Chief Counsel, Room
835, 500 C Street, SW., Washington, DC 20472.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Sean Murphy, Policy Advisor to the
Deputy Administrator, Federal Emergency Management Agency, 500 C

Street, NW., Washington, DC 20472,<PHONE_NUMBER>.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: On February 28, 2003, the President issued
Homeland Security Presidential Directive-5 (HSPD-5), Management of
Domestic Incidents, which directed the Secretary of Homeland Security
to develop and administer a National Incident Management System (NIMS).
This system provides a consistent nationwide template to enable
Federal, State, tribal, and local governments, the private sector, and
nongovernmental organizations to work together to prevent, protect
against, respond to, recover from, and mitigate the effects of
incidents, regardless of cause, size, location, or complexity in order
to reduce the loss of life and property, and the harm to the
environment. This consistency provides the foundation for utilization
of NIMS for all incidents, ranging from daily occurrences to incidents
requiring a coordinated Federal response. NIMS represents a core set of
doctrines, concepts, principles, terminology, and organizational
processes that enables effective, efficient, and collaborative incident
management.
    Building on the foundation provided by existing emergency
management and incident response systems used by jurisdictions,
organizations, and functional disciplines at all levels, the NIMS
document integrates best practices into a comprehensive framework for
use by emergency management/response personnel in an all-hazards
context nationwide. These best practices lay the groundwork for the
components of NIMS and provide the mechanisms for the further
development and refinement of supporting national standards,
guidelines, protocols, systems, and technologies. NIMS fosters the
development of specialized technologies that facilitate emergency
management and incident response activities and allows for the adoption
of new approaches that will enable continuous refinement of NIMS over
time.
    The changes reflected in the revised document are not substantively
dramatic, and do not alter the basic NIMS doctrine published in the
2004 version. The Department is providing the current draft of the NIMS
for public comment; this draft document does not necessarily reflect
the final policy of the Administration.

    Authority: Homeland Security Act of 2002, as amended, 6 U.S.C.
101 et seq., Homeland Security Presidential Directive-5, Management
of Domestic Incidents.

    Dated: May 5, 2008.
R. David Paulison,
Administrator, Federal Emergency Management Agency.
 [FR Doc. E8-10449 Filed 5-8-08; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 9110-21-P


[Federal Register: September 26, 2005 (Volume 70, Number 185)]
[Notices]
[Page 56171]
[DOCID:fr26se05-37]

=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY

Federal Emergency Management Agency

[FEMA-1605-DR]

Alabama; Amendment No. 4 to Notice of a Major Disaster
Declaration

AGENCY: Federal Emergency Management Agency, Emergency Preparedness and
Response Directorate, Department of Homeland Security.

ACTION: Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: This notice amends the notice of a major disaster declaration
for the State of Alabama (FEMA-1605-DR), dated August 29, 2005, and
related determinations.

DATES: Effective September 18, 2005.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Magda Ruiz, Recovery Division, Federal
Emergency Management Agency, Washington, DC 20472,<PHONE_NUMBER>.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The Federal Emergency Management Agency
(FEMA) hereby gives notice that pursuant to the authority vested in the
Acting Under Secretary for Emergency Preparedness and Response,
Department of Homeland Security, under Executive Order 12148, as
amended, Michael Bolch, of FEMA is appointed to act as the Federal
Coordinating Officer for this declared disaster.
    This action terminates my appointment of Ron Sherman as Federal
Coordinating Officer for this disaster.

(The following Catalog of Federal Domestic Assistance Numbers (CFDA)
are to be used for reporting and drawing funds: 97.030, Community
Disaster Loans; 97.031, Cora Brown Fund Program; 97.032, Crisis
Counseling; 97.033, Disaster Legal Services Program; 97.034,
Disaster Unemployment Assistance (DUA); 97.046, Fire Management
Assistance; 97.048, Individuals and Households Housing; 97.049,
Individuals and Households Disaster Housing Operations; 97.050,
Individuals and Households Program--Other Needs; 97.036, Public
Assistance Grants; 97.039, Hazard Mitigation Grant Program.)

R. David Paulison,
Acting Under Secretary, Emergency Preparedness and Response, Department
of Homeland Security.
[FR Doc. 05-19105 Filed 9-23-05; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 9110-10-P


[Federal Register Volume 84, Number 72 (Monday, April 15, 2019)]
[Notices]
[Page 15239]
[FR Doc No: 2019-07365]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

[Release No. 34-85573; File No. SR-NYSEArca-2019-04]

Self-Regulatory Organizations; NYSE Arca, Inc.; Notice of
Designation of a Longer Period for Commission Action on a Proposed Rule
Change To Amend NYSE Arca Rule 5.2-E(j)(3) To Adopt Generic Listing
Standards for Investment Company Units Based on an Index of Municipal
Bond Securities

April 9, 2019.
    On February 8, 2019, NYSE Arca, Inc. (``Exchange'' or ``NYSE
Arca'') filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission
(``Commission''), pursuant to Section 19(b)(1) of the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934 (``Act'') \1\ and Rule 19b-4 thereunder,\2\ a
proposed rule change to amend NYSE Arca Rule 5.2-E(j)(3) to adopt
generic listing standards for Investment Company Units based on an
index of municipal bond securities. The proposed rule change was
published for comment in the Federal Register on February 27, 2019.\3\
The Commission has received no comment letters on the proposed rule
change.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \1\ 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(1).
    \2\ 17 CFR 240.19b-4.
    \3\ See Securities Exchange Act Release No. 85170 (Feb. 21,
2019), 84 FR 6451.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    Section 19(b)(2) of the Act \4\ provides that within 45 days of the
publication of notice of the filing of a proposed rule change, or
within such longer period up to 90 days as the Commission may designate
if it finds such longer period to be appropriate and publishes its
reasons for so finding or as to which the self-regulatory organization
consents, the Commission shall either approve the proposed rule change,
disapprove the proposed rule change, or institute proceedings to
determine whether the proposed rule change should be disapproved. The
45th day after publication of the notice for this proposed rule change
is April 13, 2019. The Commission is extending this 45-day time period.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \4\ 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(2).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    The Commission finds that it is appropriate to designate a longer
period within which to take action on the proposed rule change so that
it has sufficient time to consider the proposed rule change.
Accordingly, the Commission, pursuant to Section 19(b)(2) of the
Act,\5\ designates May 28, 2019, as the date by which the Commission
shall either approve or disapprove, or institute proceedings to
determine whether to disapprove, the proposed rule change (File No. SR-
NYSEArca-2019-04).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \5\ Id.
    \6\ 17 CFR 200.30-3(a)(31).

    For the Commission, by the Division of Trading and Markets,
pursuant to delegated authority.\6\
Jill M. Peterson,
Assistant Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2019-07365 Filed 4-12-19; 8:45 am]
 BILLING CODE 8011-01-P


This CD-ROM is not available in Regulations.gov. Contact the
EPA Docket Center, Public Reading Room to view or receive a copy of this document. Requests for copies may be made as follows:

In person/writing:
Environmental Protection Agency, Docket Center
1301 Constitution Ave NW, 2822T, Room 3334
Washington, DC. 20004
Telephone:
202-566-1744
Fax:
202-566- 9744
Email:
<EMAIL_ADDRESS>


[Federal Register Volume 81, Number 97 (Thursday, May 19, 2016)]
[Notices]
[Pages 31643-31644]
[FR Doc No: 2016-11776]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES

Food and Drug Administration

[Docket No. FDA-2016-N-0001]

Advisory Committee; Peripheral and Central Nervous System Drugs
Advisory Committee, Renewal

AGENCY: Food and Drug Administration, HHS.

ACTION: Notice; renewal of advisory committee.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Food and Drug Administration (FDA) is announcing the
renewal of the Peripheral and Central Nervous System Drugs Advisory
Committee by the Commissioner of Food and Drugs (the Commissioner). The
Commissioner has determined that it is in the public interest to renew
the Peripheral and Central Nervous System Drugs Advisory Committee for
an additional 2 years beyond the charter expiration date. The new
charter will be in effect until June 4, 2018.

DATES: Authority for the Peripheral and Central Nervous System Drugs
Advisory Committee will expire on June 4, 2016, unless the Commissioner
formally determines that renewal is in the public interest.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Moon Hee V. Choi, Center for Drug
Evaluation and Research, Food and Drug Administration, 10903 New
Hampshire Ave., Bldg. 31, Rm. 2417, Silver Spring, MD 20993-0002, 301-

796-9001, FAX:<PHONE_NUMBER><EMAIL_ADDRESS>
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Pursuant to 41 CFR 102-3.65 and approval by
the Department of Health and Human Services pursuant to 45 CFR part 11
and by the General Services Administration, FDA is announcing the
renewal of the Peripheral and Central Nervous System Drugs Advisory
Committee. The committee is a discretionary Federal advisory committee
established to provide advice to the Commissioner. The Peripheral and
Central Nervous System Drugs Advisory Committee advises the
Commissioner or designee in discharging responsibilities as they relate
to helping to ensure safe and effective drugs for human use and, as
required, any other product for which the Food and Drug Administration
has regulatory responsibility. The Committee reviews and evaluates data
concerning the safety and effectiveness of marketed and investigational
human drug products for use in the treatment of neurologic diseases.
    The Committee shall consist of a core of nine voting members
including the Chair. Members and the Chair are selected by the
Commissioner or designee from among authorities knowledgeable in the
fields of neurology, neuropharmacology, neuropathology, otolaryngology,
epidemiology or statistics, and related specialties. Members will be
invited to serve for overlapping terms of up to 4 years. Almost all
non-Federal members of this committee serve as Special Government
Employees. The core of voting members may include one technically
qualified member, selected by the Commissioner or designee, who is
identified with consumer interests and is recommended by either a
consortium of consumer-oriented organizations or other interested
persons. In addition to the voting members, the Committee may include
one non-voting member who is identified with industry interests.
Further information regarding the most recent charter and other
information can be found at http://www.fda.gov/AdvisoryCommittees/CommitteesMeetingMaterials/Drugs/PeripheralandCentralNervousSystemDrugsAdvisoryCommittee/ucm107494.htm
or by contacting the Designated Federal Officer (see FOR FURTHER
INFORMATION CONTACT). In light of the fact that no change has been made
to the committee name or description of duties, no amendment will be
made to 21 CFR 14.100.
    This document is issued under the Federal Advisory Committee Act (5
U.S.C. app.). For general information related to FDA advisory
committees, please visit us at http://www.fda.gov/AdvisoryCommittees/default.htm.

    Dated: May 13, 2016.
Jill Hartzler Warner,
Associate Commissioner for Special Medical Programs.
[FR Doc. 2016-11776 Filed 5-18-16; 8:45 am]
 BILLING CODE 4164-01-P


[Federal Register Volume 85, Number 76 (Monday, April 20, 2020)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Pages 21764-21766]
[FR Doc No: 2020-08202]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION

Federal Aviation Administration

14 CFR Part 39

[Docket No. FAA-2019-1073; Product Identifier 2019-NM-186-AD; Amendment
39-19896; AD 2020-07-17]
RIN 2120-AA64

Airworthiness Directives; Saab AB, Support and Services (Formerly
Known as Saab AB, Saab Aeronautics) Airplanes

AGENCY: Federal Aviation Administration (FAA), Department of
Transportation (DOT).

ACTION: Final rule.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The FAA is adopting a new airworthiness directive (AD) for all
Saab AB, Support and Services Model SAAB 2000 airplanes. This AD was
prompted by a determination that new or more restrictive airworthiness
limitations are necessary. This AD requires revising the existing
maintenance or inspection program, as applicable, to incorporate new or
more restrictive airworthiness limitations, as specified in a European
Union Aviation Safety Agency (EASA) AD, which is incorporated by
reference. The FAA is issuing this AD to address the unsafe condition
on these products.

DATES: This AD is effective May 26, 2020.
    The Director of the Federal Register approved the incorporation by
reference of a certain publication listed in this AD as of May 26,
2020.

ADDRESSES: For the material incorporated by reference (IBR) in this AD,
contact the EASA, Konrad-Adenauer-Ufer 3, 50668 Cologne, Germany;
telephone +49 221 89990 1000; email<EMAIL_ADDRESS>internet
www.easa.europa.eu. You may find this IBR material on the EASA website
at https://ad.easa.europa.eu. You may view this IBR material at the
FAA, Transport Standards Branch, 2200 South 216th St., Des Moines, WA.
For information on the availability of this material at the FAA, call
206-231-3195. It is also available in the AD docket on the internet at
https://www.regulations.gov by searching for and locating Docket No.
FAA-2019-1073.

Examining the AD Docket

    You may examine the AD docket on the internet at https://www.regulations.gov by searching for and locating Docket No. FAA-2019-
1073; or in person at Docket Operations between 9 a.m. and 5 p.m.,
Monday through Friday, except Federal holidays. The AD docket contains
this final rule, any comments received, and other information. The
address for Docket Operations is U.S. Department of Transportation,
Docket Operations, M-30, West Building Ground Floor, Room W12-140, 1200
New Jersey Avenue SE, Washington, DC 20590.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Shahram Daneshmandi, Aerospace
Engineer, International Section, Transport Standards Branch, FAA, 2200
South 216th St., Des Moines, WA 98198; telephone and fax<PHONE_NUMBER>;
email<EMAIL_ADDRESS>
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

Discussion

    The EASA, which is the Technical Agent for the Member States of the
European Union, has issued EASA AD 2019-0263, dated October 22, 2019
(``EASA AD 2019-0263'') (also referred to as the Mandatory Continuing
Airworthiness Information, or ``the MCAI''), to correct an unsafe
condition for all Saab AB, Support and Services Model SAAB 2000
airplanes.
    The FAA issued a notice of proposed rulemaking (NPRM) to amend 14
CFR part 39 by adding an AD that would apply to all Saab AB, Support
and Services Model SAAB 2000 airplanes. The NPRM published in the
Federal Register on January 17, 2020 (85 FR 2911). The NPRM was
prompted by a determination that new or more restrictive airworthiness
limitations are necessary. The NPRM proposed to require revising the
existing maintenance or inspection program, as applicable, to
incorporate new or more restrictive airworthiness limitations, as
specified in an EASA AD.
    The FAA is issuing this AD to address, among other things, fatigue
cracking of principal structural elements (PSEs) and corrosion
prevention and control. This unsafe condition, if not addressed, could
result in reduced structural integrity of a PSE, and lead to loss of
control of the airplane. See the MCAI for additional background
information.

Comments

    The FAA gave the public the opportunity to participate in
developing this final rule. We received no comments on the NPRM or on
the determination of the cost to the public.

Clarification of Paragraph (i) of This AD

    Once a maintenance or inspection program is revised as required by
paragraph (g) of this AD, paragraph (i) of this AD does not allow for
the later

use of alternative actions or intervals unless these alternative
actions or intervals are approved as specified in the ``Ref.
Publications'' section of EASA AD 2019-0288. In the NPRM, the FAA
proposed language using the word ``except.'' To make the language
consistent with the language in the ``Ref. Publications'' section of
EASA AD 2019-0288, the FAA has changed the wording to ``unless they are
approved.''

Conclusion

    The FAA reviewed the relevant data and determined that air safety
and the public interest require adopting this final rule as proposed,
except for minor editorial changes. The FAA has determined that these
minor changes:
     Are consistent with the intent that was proposed in the
NPRM for addressing the unsafe condition; and
     Do not add any additional burden upon the public than was
already proposed in the NPRM.

Related IBR Material Under 1 CFR Part 51

    EASA AD 2019-0263 describes airworthiness limitations for safe life
limits, structural limitation items, and fuel airworthiness items, as
well as certification maintenance requirements. This material is
reasonably available because the interested parties have access to it
through their normal course of business or by the means identified in
the ADDRESSES section.

Costs of Compliance

    The FAA estimates that this AD affects 11 airplanes of U.S.
registry. The FAA estimates the following costs to comply with this AD:
    The FAA has determined that revising the maintenance or inspection
program takes an average of 90 work-hours per operator, although the
agency recognizes that this number may vary from operator to operator.
In the past, the agency has estimated that this action takes 1 work
hour per airplane. Since operators incorporate maintenance or
inspection program changes for their affected fleet(s), the FAA has
determined that a per-operator estimate is more accurate than a per-
airplane estimate. Therefore, the agency estimates the average total
cost per operator to be $7,650 (90 work-hours x $85 per work-hour).

Authority for This Rulemaking

    Title 49 of the United States Code specifies the FAA's authority to
issue rules on aviation safety. Subtitle I, section 106, describes the
authority of the FAA Administrator. Subtitle VII: Aviation Programs,
describes in more detail the scope of the Agency's authority.
    The FAA is issuing this rulemaking under the authority described in
Subtitle VII, Part A, Subpart III, Section 44701: ``General
requirements.'' Under that section, Congress charges the FAA with
promoting safe flight of civil aircraft in air commerce by prescribing
regulations for practices, methods, and procedures the Administrator
finds necessary for safety in air commerce. This regulation is within
the scope of that authority because it addresses an unsafe condition
that is likely to exist or develop on products identified in this
rulemaking action.

Regulatory Findings

    This AD will not have federalism implications under Executive Order
13132. This AD will not have a substantial direct effect on the States,
on the relationship between the national government and the States, or
on the distribution of power and responsibilities among the various
levels of government.
    For the reasons discussed above, I certify that this AD:
    (1) Is not a ``significant regulatory action'' under Executive
Order 12866,
    (2) Will not affect intrastate aviation in Alaska, and
    (3) Will not have a significant economic impact, positive or
negative, on a substantial number of small entities under the criteria
of the Regulatory Flexibility Act.

List of Subjects in 14 CFR Part 39

    Air transportation, Aircraft, Aviation safety, Incorporation by
reference, Safety.

Adoption of the Amendment

    Accordingly, under the authority delegated to me by the
Administrator, the FAA amends 14 CFR part 39 as follows:

PART 39--AIRWORTHINESS DIRECTIVES

0
1. The authority citation for part 39 continues to read as follows:

    Authority: 49 U.S.C. 106(g), 40113, 44701.

Sec.  39.13  [Amended]

0
2. The FAA amends Sec.  39.13 by adding the following new airworthiness
directive (AD):

2020-07-17 Saab AB, Support and Services (Formerly Known as Saab AB,
Saab Aeronautics): Amendment 39-19896; Docket No. FAA-2019-1073;
Product Identifier 2019-NM-186-AD.

(a) Effective Date

    This AD is effective May 26, 2020.

(b) Affected ADs

    None.

(c) Applicability

    This AD applies to all Saab AB, Support and Services (formerly
known as Saab AB, Saab Aeronautics) Model SAAB 2000 airplanes,
certificated in any category.

(d) Subject

    Air Transport Association (ATA) of America Code 05, Time Limits/
Maintenance Checks.

(e) Reason

    This AD was prompted by a determination that new or more
restrictive airworthiness limitations are necessary. The FAA is
issuing this AD to address, among other things, fatigue cracking of
principal structural elements (PSEs) and corrosion prevention and
control. This unsafe condition, if not addressed, could result in
reduced structural integrity of a PSE, and lead to loss of control
of the airplane.

(f) Compliance

    Comply with this AD within the compliance times specified,
unless already done.

(g) New Maintenance or Inspection Program Revision

    Except as specified in paragraph (h) of this AD: Comply with all
required actions and compliance times specified in, and in
accordance with, European Union Aviation Safety Agency (EASA) AD
2019-0263, dated October 22, 2019 (``EASA AD 2019-0263'').

(h) Exceptions to EASA AD 2019-0263

    (1) The requirements specified in paragraphs (1) and (2) of EASA
AD 2019-0263 do not apply to this AD.
    (2) Paragraph (3) of EASA AD 2019-0263 specifies revising ``the
approved AMP [aircraft maintenance program]'' within 12 months after
its effective date, but this AD requires revising the existing
maintenance or inspection program, as applicable, to incorporate the
``limitations, tasks and associated thresholds and intervals''
specified in paragraph (3) of EASA AD 2019-0263 within 90 days after
the effective date of this AD.
    (3) The initial compliance time for doing the tasks specified in
paragraph (3) of EASA AD 2019-0263 is at the applicable ``associated
thresholds'' specified in paragraph (3) of EASA AD 2019-0263, or
within 90 days after the effective date of this AD, whichever occurs
later.
    (4) The provisions specified in paragraphs (4) and (5) of EASA
AD 2019-0263 do not apply to this AD.
    (5) The ``Remarks'' section of EASA AD 2019-0263 does not apply
to this AD.

(i) New Provisions for Alternative Actions, Intervals, and Critical
Design Configuration Control Limitations (CDCCLs)

    After the maintenance or inspection program has been revised as
required by paragraph (g) of this AD, no alternative actions (e.g.,
inspections), intervals, and CDCCLs are allowed unless they are
approved as specified in the provisions of the

``Ref. Publications'' section of EASA AD 2019-0263.

(j) Other FAA AD Provisions

    The following provisions also apply to this AD:
    (1) Alternative Methods of Compliance (AMOCs): The Manager,
International Section, Transport Standards Branch, FAA, has the
authority to approve AMOCs for this AD, if requested using the
procedures found in 14 CFR 39.19. In accordance with 14 CFR 39.19,
send your request to your principal inspector or local Flight
Standards District Office, as appropriate. If sending information
directly to the International Section, send it to the attention of
the person identified in paragraph (k) of this AD. Information may
be emailed to<EMAIL_ADDRESS>Before using any
approved AMOC, notify your appropriate principal inspector, or
lacking a principal inspector, the manager of the local flight
standards district office/certificate holding district office.
    (2) Contacting the Manufacturer: For any requirement in this AD
to obtain instructions from a manufacturer, the instructions must be
accomplished using a method approved by the Manager, International
Section, Transport Standards Branch, FAA; or EASA; or Saab SB
Support and Services' EASA Design Organization Approval (DOA). If
approved by the DOA, the approval must include the DOA-authorized
signature.

(k) Related Information

    For more information about this AD, contact Shahram Daneshmandi,
Aerospace Engineer, International Section, Transport Standards
Branch, FAA, 2200 South 216th St., Des Moines, WA 98198; telephone
and fax<PHONE_NUMBER>; email<EMAIL_ADDRESS>
(l) Material Incorporated by Reference

    (1) The Director of the Federal Register approved the
incorporation by reference (IBR) of the service information listed
in this paragraph under 5 U.S.C. 552(a) and 1 CFR part 51.
    (2) You must use this service information as applicable to do
the actions required by this AD, unless this AD specifies otherwise.
    (i) European Union Aviation Safety Agency (EASA) AD 2019-0263,
dated October 22, 2019.
    (ii) [Reserved]
    (3) For information about EASA AD 2019-0263, contact the EASA,
Konrad-Adenauer-Ufer 3, 50668 Cologne, Germany; telephone +49 221
89990 6017; email<EMAIL_ADDRESS>Internet www.easa.europa.eu.
You may find this EASA AD on the EASA website at https://ad.easa.europa.eu.
    (4) You may view this material at the FAA, Transport Standards
Branch, 2200 South 216th St., Des Moines, WA. For information on the
availability of this material at the FAA, call<PHONE_NUMBER>. This
material may be found in the AD docket on the internet at https://www.regulations.gov by searching for and locating Docket No. FAA-
2019-1073.
    (5) You may view this material that is incorporated by reference
at the National Archives and Records Administration (NARA). For
information on the availability of this material at NARA, email
<EMAIL_ADDRESS>or go to: https://www.archives.gov/federal-register/cfr/ibr-locations.html.

    Issued on April 3, 2020.
Lance T. Gant,
Director, Compliance & Airworthiness Division, Aircraft Certification
Service.
[FR Doc. 2020-08202 Filed 4-17-20; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910-13-P


[Federal Register Volume 77, Number 145 (Friday, July 27, 2012)]
[Notices]
[Pages 44227-44229]
[FR Doc No: 2012-18288]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY

[EPA-HQ-OECA-2012-0157; FRL 9519-9]

Agency Information Collection Activities; Submission to OMB for
Review and Approval; Comment Request; Enforcement Policy Regarding the
Sale and Use of Aftermarket Catalytic Converters (Renewal)

AGENCY: Environmental Protection Agency (EPA).

ACTION: Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: In compliance with the Paperwork Reduction Act (PRA)(44 U.S.C.
3501 et seq.), this document announces that an Information Collection
Request (ICR) has been forwarded to the Office of Management and Budget
(OMB) for review and approval. This is a request to renew an existing
approved collection. The ICR, which is abstracted below, describes the
nature of the information collection and its estimated burden and cost.

DATES: Additional comments may be submitted on or before August 27,
2012.

ADDRESSES: Submit your comments, referencing Docket ID No. EPA-HQ-OECA-
2012-0157, to: (1) EPA online using www.regulations.gov (our preferred
method), by email to<EMAIL_ADDRESS>or by mail to: EPA

Docket Center, Environmental Protection Agency, Mail Code 28221T, 1200
Pennsylvania Ave. NW., Washington, DC 20460, and to (2) OMB by mail to:
Office of Information and Regulatory Affairs, Office of Management and
Budget (OMB), Attention: Desk Officer for EPA, 725 17th Street NW.,
Washington, DC 20503.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: David E. Alexander, Air Enforcement
Division (2242A), Environmental Protection Agency, 1200 Pennsylvania
Ave. NW., Washington, DC 20460; telephone number:<PHONE_NUMBER>; fax
number:<PHONE_NUMBER>; email address<EMAIL_ADDRESS>
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: EPA has submitted the following ICR to OMB
for review and approval according to the procedures prescribed in 5 CFR
1320.12. On April 19, 2012 (77 FR 23478), EPA sought comments on this
ICR pursuant to 5 CFR 1320.8(d). EPA received no comments. Any
additional comments on this ICR should be submitted to EPA and OMB
within 30 days of this notice.
    EPA has established a public docket for this ICR under Docket ID
No. EPA-HQ-OECA-2012-0157, which is available for online viewing at
www.regulations.gov, or in person viewing at the Enforcement and
Compliance Docket in the EPA Docket Center (EPA/DC), EPA West, Room
3334, 1301 Constitution Ave. NW., Washington, DC. The EPA/DC Public
Reading Room is open from 8:30 a.m. to 4:30 p.m., Monday through
Friday, excluding legal holidays. The telephone number for the Reading
Room is<PHONE_NUMBER>, and the telephone number for the Enforcement and
Compliance Docket is<PHONE_NUMBER>.
    Use EPA's electronic docket and comment system at
www.regulations.gov, to submit or view public comments, access the
index listing of the contents of the docket, and to access those
documents in the docket that are available electronically. Once in the
system, select ``docket search,'' then key in the docket ID number
identified above. Please note that EPA's policy is that public
comments, whether submitted electronically or in paper, will be made
available for public viewing at www.regulations.gov as EPA receives
them and without change, unless the comment contains copyrighted
material, confidential business information (CBI), or other information
whose public disclosure is restricted by statute. For further
information about the electronic docket, go to www.regulations.gov.
    Title: Enforcement Policy Regarding the Sale and Use of Aftermarket
Catalytic Converters (Renewal).
    ICR numbers: EPA ICR No. 1292.09, OMB Control No. 2060-0135.
    ICR Status: This ICR is scheduled to expire on August 31, 2012.
Under OMB regulations, the Agency may continue to conduct or sponsor
the collection of information while this submission is pending at OMB.
An Agency may not conduct or sponsor, and a person is not required to
respond to, a collection of information, unless it displays a currently
valid OMB control number. The OMB control numbers for EPA's regulations
in title 40 of the CFR, after appearing in the Federal Register when
approved, are listed in 40 CFR part 9, are displayed either by
publication in the Federal Register or by other appropriate means, such
as on the related collection instrument or form, if applicable. The
display of OMB control numbers in certain EPA regulations is
consolidated in 40 CFR part 9.
    Abstract: The aftermarket catalytic converter policy (AMCC Policy)
(51 FR 28114-28119, 28113 (Aug. 5, 1986); 52 FR. 42144 (Nov. 3, 1987))
allows aftermarket automobile catalytic converter (AMCC) manufacturers
and reconditioners to compete with the automobile manufacturers for the
AMCC replacement market. Without this policy, it would be illegal,
under section 203 of the Clean Air Act, 42 U.S.C. 7522, to sell or
install AMCCs that do not conform exactly to the automobile
manufacturers' original equipment (OE) versions of these parts. The
AMCC Policy makes it possible for automobile repair shops, which are
often small businesses, to take on a significant share of the AMCC
replacement market. In doing so, consumers are able to purchase AMCCs
at a much lower price than they would pay for an OE catalytic
converter. This helps to ensure that vehicles will not create excessive
air pollution because motorists are more likely to replace damaged
catalytic converters if they can be obtained at a cost that is
significantly less than OE catalytic converters (cost savings resulting
from the AMCC Policy are estimated to be about $716 million in 2007
dollars).
    New AMCC manufacturers are required to report, on a one-time basis
for each type or line of converter manufactured, the supplier
identities, physical specifications of each AMCC line produced, and
information regarding pre-production testing of the AMCCs that show
they meet the AMCC Policy emission reduction standards for certain
specified vehicle applications. The AMCC Policy requires new AMCC
manufacturers to retain warranty and sales records.
    Reconditioners (sellers of used catalytic converters) must report,
on a one-time basis, the identity of the company, a description of the
test bench used for testing used catalytic converters, and the intended
vehicle application(s) for each catalytic converter type. All used
catalytic converters must be tested individually to ensure they are
still functional. The current AMCC Policy also requires reconditioners
to retain sales and customer records.
    Installers of AMCCs have no reporting requirements. They must fill
out a written warranty and give it to the customer, include a statement
with each invoice stating the need for replacing the original
converter, and tag each removed converter with a reference to the
invoice for repair, and retain the tagged catalytic converters for 15
days and the invoices for six months.
    The reporting and recordkeeping requirements for manufacturers of
new AMCCs and sellers of reconditioned catalytic converters help ensure
that proper AMCCs are manufactured, tested and distributed to
installers and help ensure proper retail level installation of AMCCs.
The installer requirements enable EPA to monitor whether correct AMCCs
are installed at the retail level and whether AMCCs are used only in
appropriate circumstances. The information required to be maintained or
reported is not otherwise available and is not covered under any other
information request since it is unique to the AMCC Policy. The
information collected is necessary for the proper performance of the
functions of the Agency, particularly enforcement.
    Burden Statement: The annual public reporting and recordkeeping
burden for this collection of information is estimated to average 7
hours per response. Burden means the total time, effort, or financial
resources expended by persons to generate, maintain, retain, or
disclose or provide information to or for a Federal agency. This
includes the time needed to review instructions; develop, acquire,
install, and utilize technology and systems for the purposes of
collecting, validating, and verifying information; processing and
maintaining information; and disclosing and providing information;
adjust the existing ways to comply with any previously applicable
instructions and requirements which have subsequently changed; train
personnel to be able to respond to a collection of information; search
data sources; complete and review the collection of information;

and transmit or otherwise disclose the information.
    Respondents/Affected Entities: Manufacturers, Reconditioners, and
Installers of Aftermarket Catalytic Converters.
    Estimated Number of Respondents: 30,014.
    Frequency of Response: On Occasion.
    Estimated Total Annual Hour Burden: 220,860.
    Estimated Total Annual Cost: $7,896,947, including $777,112
annualized capital or O&M costs.
    Changes in the Estimates: There is a decrease of 68 hours in the
total estimated burden currently identified in the OMB Inventory of
Approved ICR Burdens. This decrease is due to the correction of two
errors. First, we failed to account for the fact that new catalyst
manufacturers submit information on average every other year.
Therefore, although the burden of submitting is two hours per
respondent, the annual average is one hour per respondent. This
correction decreased the burden estimate by eight hours. Second, we
corrected a multiplication error affecting the burden hour calculation
for installers, a decrease of 60 hours. The decrease reflects an
adjustment in ICR estimates, not a program change.

John Moses,
Director, Collection Strategies Division.
[FR Doc. 2012-18288 Filed 7-26-12; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6560-50-P


Memorandum to the Docket Regarding the Effect of EPA v. EME Homer City Generation, L.P., 134 S. Ct. 1,584 (2014) on Publication of the Final Rule

	On March 26, 2012, EPA proposed to approve the Connecticut state implementation plan (SIP) to address regional haze for the first planning period (the "Connecticut RH SIP"). 77 Fed. Reg. 17,367. Among other things, the Connecticut RH SIP proposed to satisfy the Clean Air Act's requirement for Best Available Retrofit Technology (BART) at the State's electric generating units by relying in part on a state regulation implementing EPA's Clean Air Interstate Rule (CAIR). However, to address the United States Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit's decision in North Carolina v. EPA, 550 F.3d 1,176 (D.C. Cir. 2008), which remanded CAIR to EPA, Connecticut submitted for parallel processing a proposed amendment to its state regulations that permanently would maintain the oxides of nitrogen (NOX) emission reductions required by the existing state regulation implementing CAIR.
      On August 21, 2012, the D.C. Circuit issued its decision in EME Homer City Generation, L.P. v. EPA, 609 F.3d 7 (D.C. Cir. 2012), vacating EPA's Cross-State Air Pollution Rule (CSAPR), which EPA had promulgated as a replacement for CAIR. The court also ordered EPA "to continue to administer CAIR pending its development of a valid replacement." Id. at 38.
      On November 19, 2012, then EPA Assistant Administrator Gina McCarthy issued a memorandum to the regional Air Division Directors (the "McCarthy Memo") in response to the D.C. Circuit's decision in EME Homer City. Among other things, the McCarthy Memo advised that, in light of the court's mandate that EPA continue administering CAIR pending a valid replacement, it would be appropriate for states to rely on CAIR emission reductions as permanent and enforceable in certain circumstances "until any further proceedings in [EME Homer City] are resolved . . . ." Memo at 2. Moreover, the McCarthy Memo advised that it would be appropriate for Region 1 to approve the Connecticut RH SIP based on the aforementioned rationale. Id.
      On November 23, 2012, the Connecticut Department of Environmental Protection submitted a letter to EPA withdrawing the state's parallel processing request of the proposed replacement regulation for CAIR and requesting approval of its original SIP submission.
      On January 24, 2013, EPA issued a notice of supplemental proposed rulemaking that acknowledged receipt of the withdrawal letter. 78 Fed. Reg. 5,158. In accordance with the reasoning in the McCarthy Memo regarding the import of the D.C. Circuit's decision in EME Homer City, EPA proposed to approve the Connecticut RH SIP as originally submitted. EPA found that the state could rely on its existing state regulation implementing CAIR because the associated reductions in NOX would be "permanent and enforceable for the foreseeable future." Id. at 5,160.
	On April 26, 2013, then EPA Region 1 Deputy Regional Administrator Ira Leighton, acting for Regional Administrator H. Curtis Spalding, signed and promulgated a final rule approving the Connecticut RH SIP as proposed. EPA Region 1 distributed copies of the final rule to Connecticut and a group of environmental litigants. Due to issues not relevant here, the Office of the Federal Register (OFR) has not published the final rule as of June 4, 2014.
	On April 29, 2014, the United States Supreme Court issued its decision in EPA v. EME Homer City Generation, L.P., 134 S. Ct. 1,584 (2014), reversing the D.C. Circuit's decision vacating CSAPR and remanding the case for further proceedings. As of this time, however, CSAPR remains stayed and CAIR remains in effect.
	On May 27, 2014, consistent with OFR regulations governing final rules that remain unpublished for more than one year after original signature and promulgation, EPA Region 1 Regional Administrator H. Curtis Spalding reaffirmed the signature of former Deputy Regional Administrator Ira Leighton.
	EPA does not believe that the Supreme Court's decision in EME Homer City impacts the forthcoming publication of EPA's final rule approving the Connecticut RH SIP. At the time EPA signed and promulgated the final rule, the D.C. Circuit's decision directing EPA to continue administering CAIR pending a valid replacement remained good law. Moreover, as explained in the McCarthy Memo, EPA believed at that time that states could rely on emission reductions associated with CAIR "until any further proceedings in [EME Homer City] are resolved . . . ." Memo at 2. Because the Supreme Court had not yet issued its decision in EME Homer City at the time that EPA signed and promulgated the final rule, EPA properly concluded that reductions associated with CAIR remained permanent and enforceable at that time. Although publication of the final rule in the Federal Register has been delayed, EPA signed, promulgated, and distributed the final rule on April 26, 2013 when the D.C. Circuit's decision in EME Homer City was the operative law.


[Federal Register: November 2, 2007 (Volume 72, Number 212)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Page 62117-62119]
[DOCID:fr02no07-8]

=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY

Coast Guard

33 CFR Part 165

[CGD05-07-088]
RIN 1625-AA00

Safety Zone: Holiday Flotilla Fireworks Display, Motts Channel/
Banks Channel, Wrightsville Beach, NC

AGENCY: Coast Guard, DHS.

ACTION: Temporary final rule.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Coast Guard proposes the establishment of a 1,000 foot
safety zone around a fireworks display for the North Carolina Holiday
Flotilla occurring on November 24, 2007, on Motts Channel/ Banks
Channel, Wrightsville Beach, NC. This action is intended to restrict
vessel traffic on Motts Channel. This safety zone is necessary to
protect mariners from the hazards associated with fireworks displays.

DATES: This rule will be effective from 6 p.m. to 8 p.m. on November
24, 2007.

ADDRESSES: You may mail comments and related material to Commander,
Sector North Carolina, 2301 East Fort Macon Road, Atlantic Beach, NC
28512. Sector North Carolina maintains the public docket for this
rulemaking. Comments and material received from the public, as well as
documents indicated in this preamble as being available in the docket,
will become part of this docket and will be available for

inspection or copying at the Federal Building Fifth Coast Guard
District between 9 a.m. and 2 p.m., Monday through Friday, except
Federal Holidays.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Chief Todd C. Mann, Marine
Environmental Response Branch, Coast Guard Marine Safety Unit
Wilmington, North Carolina at<PHONE_NUMBER>.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

Regulatory Information

    A Notice of Proposed Rulemaking Holiday Flotilla Fireworks Display,
Motts Channel/Banks Channel, Wrightsville Beach, North Carolina was
published on September 14, 2007 for review in the Federal Register. (72
FR 52534). We received no comments on the proposed rule. No public
hearing was requested, and none was held.
    Under 5 U.S.C. 553(d)(3), the Coast Guard finds good cause exists
for making this rule effective less than 30 days after publication in
the Federal Register. This safety zone is a necessary measure to help
the community safely enjoy a holiday fireworks display. It is in the
public interest to protect mariners from the hazards associate with
fireworks displays and for this reason the Coast Guard is taking the
necessary preventative measure of establishing this zone.

Background and Purpose

    On November 24, 2007, the North Carolina Holiday Flotilla fireworks
display will be held adjacent to Motts Channel/Banks Channel,
Wrightsville Beach, NC. Spectators will be observing from both the
shore and from vessels. Due to the need of protection of mariners and
spectators from the hazards associated with the fireworks display,
vessel traffic will be temporarily restricted.

Discussion of Comments and Changes

    No comments were received.

Discussion of Rule

    The Coast Guard is establishing a safety zone on specified waters
of Motts Channel. The regulated area will consist of a 1000 foot safety
zone around Bird Island position latitude 34[deg]12'41'' N, longitude
077[deg]48'26'' W, which is located south of the Seapath Yacht Club,
Wrightsville Beach, NC. The safety zone will be enforced from 6 p.m. to
8 p.m. on November 24, 2007. General navigation in the safety zone will
be restricted during the event. Except for participants and vessels
authorized by the Captain of the Port Representative, no person or
vessel may enter or remain in the regulated area.

Regulatory Evaluation

    This rule is not a ``significant regulatory action'' under section
3(f) of Executive Order 12866, Regulatory Planning and Review, and does
not require an assessment of potential costs and benefits under section
6(a)(3) of that Order. The Office of Management and Budget has not
reviewed it under that Order.
    We expect the economic impact of this rule to be so minimal that a
full Regulatory Evaluation under the regulatory policies and procedures
of DHS is unnecessary. Although this regulation restricts access to the
regulated area, the effect of this rule will not be significant
because: (i) The COTP may authorize access to the safety zone; (ii) the
safety zone will be in effect for a limited duration; and (iii) the
Coast Guard will make advance notifications via maritime advisories so
mariners can adjust their plans accordingly.

Small Entities

    Under the Regulatory Flexibility Act (5 U.S.C. 601-612), we have
considered whether this rule would have a significant economic impact
on a substantial number of small entities. The term ``small entities''
comprises small businesses, not-for-profit organizations that are
independently owned and operated and are not dominant in their fields,
and governmental jurisdictions with populations of less than 50,000.
    The Coast Guard certifies under 5 U.S.C. 605(b) that this rule will
not have a significant economic impact on a substantial number of small
entities.
    This rule will affect the following entities, some of which may be
small entities: the owners and operators of vessels intending to
transit or anchor in that portion of Motts Channel/Banks Channel
November 24, 2007 between the hours of 6 p.m. and 8 p.m. The safety
zone will not have a significant impact on a substantial number of
small entities, because the zone will only be in place for a limited
amount of time and maritime advisories will be issued in advance, so
the mariners can adjust their plans accordingly.

Assistance for Small Entities

    Under section 213(a) of the Small Business Regulatory Enforcement
Fairness Act of 1996 (Pub. L. 104-121), we want to assist small
entities in understanding this rule so that they can better evaluate
its effects on them and participate in the rulemaking. If the rule
would affect your small business, organization, or governmental
jurisdiction and you have questions concerning its provisions or
options for compliance, please contact LTJG Adam Schmid, Response
Division, Coast Guard Marine Safety Unit, Wilmington, North Carolina at
(910) 772-2191. Small businesses may send comments on the actions of
Federal employees who enforce, or otherwise determine compliance with,
Federal regulations to the Small Business and Agriculture Regulatory
Enforcement Ombudsman and Regional Small Business Regulatory Fairness
Boards. The Ombudsman evaluates these actions annually and rates each
agency's responsiveness to small business. If you wish to comment on
actions by employees of the U. S. Coast Guard, call 1-888-REG-FAIR (1-
888-734-3247). The Coast Guard will not retaliate against small
entities that question or complain about this rule or any policy or
action of the Coast Guard.

Collection of Information

    This rule calls for no new collection of information under the
Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 (44 U.S.C. 3501-3520).

Federalism

    A rule has implications for federalism under Executive Order 13132,
Federalism, if it has a substantial direct effect on State or local
governments and would either preempt State law or impose a substantial
direct cost of compliance on them. We have analyzed this rule under
that Order and have determined that it does not have implications for
federalism.

Unfunded Mandates Reform Act

    The Unfunded Mandates Reform Act of 1995 (2 U.S.C. 1531-1538)
requires Federal agencies to assess the effects of their discretionary
regulatory actions. In particular, the Act addresses actions that may
result in the expenditure by a State, local, or tribal government, in
the aggregate, or by the private sector of $100,000,000 or more in any
one year. Though this rule will not result in such an expenditure, we
do discuss the effects of this rule elsewhere in this preamble.

Taking of Private Property

    This rule will not effect a taking of private property or otherwise
have taking implications under Executive Order 12630, Governmental
Actions and Interference with Constitutionally Protected Property
Rights.

Civil Justice Reform

    This rule meets applicable standards in sections 3(a) and 3(b)(2)
of Executive Order 12988, Civil Justice Reform, to

minimize litigation, eliminate ambiguity, and reduce burden.

 Protection of Children

    We have analyzed this rule under Executive Order 13045, Protection
of Children from Environmental Health Risks and Safety Risks. This rule
is not an economically significant rule and does not create an
environmental risk to health or risk to safety that might
disproportionately affect children.

Indian Tribal Governments

    This rule does not have tribal implications under Executive Order
13175, Consultation and Coordination with Indian Tribal Governments,
because it does not have a substantial direct effect on one or more
Indian tribes, on the relationship between the Federal Government and
Indian tribes, or on the distribution of power and responsibilities
between the Federal Government and Indian tribes.

Energy Effects

    We have analyzed this rule under Executive Order 13211, Actions
Concerning Regulations That Significantly Affect Energy Supply,
Distribution, or Use. We have determined that it is not a ``significant
energy action'' under that order because it is not a ``significant
regulatory action'' under Executive Order 12866 and is not likely to
have a significant adverse effect on the supply, distribution, or use
of energy. The Administrator of the Office of Information and
Regulatory Affairs has not designated it as a significant energy
action. Therefore, it does not require a Statement of Energy Effects
under Executive Order 13211.

Technical Standards

    The National Technology Transfer and Advancement Act (NTTAA) (15
U.S.C. 272 note) directs agencies to use voluntary consensus standards
in their regulatory activities unless the agency provides Congress,
through the Office of Management and Budget, with an explanation of why
using these standards would be inconsistent with applicable law or
otherwise impractical. Voluntary consensus standards are technical
standards (e.g., specifications of materials, performance, design, or
operation; test methods; sampling procedures; and related management
systems practices) that are developed or adopted by voluntary consensus
standards bodies.
    This rule does not use technical standards. Therefore, we did not
consider the use of voluntary consensus standards.

Environment

    We have analyzed this rule under Commandant Instruction M16475.lD
and Department of Homeland Security Management Directive 5100.1, which
guides the Coast Guard in complying with the National Environmental
Policy Act of 1969 (NEPA) (42 U.S.C. 4321-4370f), and have made a
preliminary determination that there are no factors in this case that
would limit the use of a categorical exclusion under section 2.B.2 of
the Instruction. Therefore, we believe that this rule should be
categorically excluded, under figure 2-1, paragraph (34)(g), of the
Instruction, from further environmental documentation. Under figure 2-
1, paragraph (34)(g), of the Instruction, an ``Environmental Analysis
Check List'' is required for this rule. A final ``Environmental
Analysis Check List'' and a final ``Categorical Exclusion
Determination'' are available in the docket where indicated under
ADDRESSES.

List of Subjects in 33 CFR Part 165

    Harbors, Marine safety, Navigation (water), Reporting and
recordkeeping requirements, Security measures, and Waterways.

0
For the reasons discussed in the preamble, the Coast Guard amends 33
CFR part 165 Subpart C as follows:

PART 165--REGULATED NAVIGATION AREAS AND LIMITED ACCESS AREAS

0
1. The authority citation for part 165 continues to read as follows:

    Authority: 33 U.S.C. 1226, 1231; 46 U.S.C. Chapter 701; 50
U.S.C. 191, 195; 33 CFR 1.05-1, 6.04-1, 6.04-6, and 160.5; Pub. L.
107-295, 116 Stat. 2064; Department of Homeland Security Delegation
No. 0170.1.

0
2. Add temporary Sec.  165.T05-123, to read as follows:

Sec.  165.T05-123  Safety Zone: Motts Channel/ Banks Channel,
Wrightsville Beach, North Carolina

    (a) Location: The following area is a safety zone: All waters of
Motts Channel/Banks Channel within 1000 feet of Bird Island at
Wrightsville Beach, NC, approximate position latitude
34[deg]12[min]41[sec] N, longitude 077[deg]48[min]26[sec] W in the
Captain of the Port Sector North Carolina zone as defined in 33 CFR
3.25-20.
    (b) Definition. As used in this section the ``on scene
representative'' means any U.S. Coast Guard commissioned, warrant or
petty officer who has been authorized by the Captain of the Port to act
on his behalf.
    (c) Regulation: (1) In accordance with the general regulations in
165.23 of this part, entry into this zone is prohibited unless
authorized by the Captain of the Port or the on scene representative.
    (2) The operator of any vessel in the immediate vicinity of this
safety zone shall:
    (i) Stop the vessel immediately upon being directed to do so by any
commissioned, warrant or petty officer on board a vessel displaying a
U.S. Coast Guard Ensign;
    (ii) Proceed as directed by any commissioned, warrant or petty
officer on board a vessel displaying a U.S. Coast Guard Ensign.
    (3) Persons or vessels requiring entry into or passage within the
safety zone must request authorization from the Captain of the Port,
Sector North Carolina or his on scene representative by telephone at
(252) 247-4570 or<PHONE_NUMBER> or by marine band radio on VHF channel
16 (156.8 MHz).
    (d) Enforcement period: This regulation will be enforced from 6
p.m. to 8 p.m. on November 24, 2007.

    Dated: October 10, 2007.
William D. Lee,
Captain, U.S. Coast Guard, Sector North Carolina.
 [FR Doc. E7-21589 Filed 11-1-07; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4910-15-P


[Federal Register Volume 76, Number 211 (Tuesday, November 1, 2011)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Pages 67366-67369]
[FR Doc No: 2011-28246]

=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY

40 CFR Part 52

[EPA-R09-OAR-2011-0382; FRL-9477-4]

Revisions to the California State Implementation Plan, Placer
County Air Pollution Control District and Sacramento Metro Air Quality
Management District

AGENCY: Environmental Protection Agency (EPA).

ACTION: Direct final rule.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: EPA is taking direct final action to approve revisions to the
Placer County Air Pollution Control District (PCAPCD) and Sacramento
Metro Air Quality Management District (SMAQMD) portions of the
California State Implementation Plan (SIP). These revisions concern
oxides of nitrogen (NOX) emissions from industrial,
institutional and commercial boilers, stationary internal combustion
engines and water heaters. We are approving local rules that regulate
these emission sources under the Clean Air Act as amended in 1990 (CAA
or the Act).

DATES: This rule is effective on January 3, 2012 without further
notice, unless EPA receives adverse comments by December 1, 2011. If we
receive such comments, we will publish a timely withdrawal in the
Federal Register to notify the public that this direct final rule will
not take effect.

ADDRESSES: Submit comments, identified by docket number EPA-R09-OAR-
2011-0382, by one of the following methods:
    1. Federal eRulemaking Portal: http://www.regulations.gov. Follow
the on-line instructions.
    2. Email<EMAIL_ADDRESS>    3. Mail or deliver: Andrew Steckel (Air-4), U.S. Environmental
Protection Agency Region IX, 75 Hawthorne Street, San Francisco, CA
94105-3901.
    Instructions: All comments will be included in the public docket
without change and may be made available online at http://www.regulations.gov, including any personal information provided,
unless the comment includes Confidential Business Information (CBI) or
other information whose disclosure is restricted by statute.
Information that you consider CBI or otherwise protected should be
clearly identified as such and should not be submitted through http://www.regulations.gov or email. http://www.regulations.gov is an
``anonymous access'' system, and EPA will not know your identity or
contact information unless you provide it in the body of your comment.
If you send email directly to EPA, your email address will be
automatically captured and included as part of the public comment. If
EPA cannot read your comment due to technical difficulties and cannot
contact you for clarification, EPA may not be able to consider your
comment. Electronic files should avoid the use of special characters,
any form of encryption, and be free of any defects or viruses.
    Docket: Generally, documents in the docket for this action are
available electronically at http://www.regulations.gov and in hard copy
at EPA Region IX, 75 Hawthorne Street, San Francisco, California. While
all documents in the docket are listed at http://www.regulations.gov,
some information may be publicly available only at the hard copy
location (e.g., copyrighted material, large maps), and some may not be
publicly available in either location (e.g., CBI). To inspect the hard
copy materials, please schedule an appointment during normal business
hours with the contact listed in the FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT
section.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Idalia P[eacute]rez, EPA Region IX,
(415) 972-3248<EMAIL_ADDRESS>
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Throughout this document, ``we,'' ``us,''
and ``our'' refer to EPA.

Table of Contents

I. The State's Submittal
    A. What rules did the State submit?
    B. Are there other versions of these rules?
    C. What is the purpose of the submitted rules?
II. EPA's Evaluation and Action
    A. How is EPA evaluating the rules?
    B. Do the rules meet the evaluation criteria?
    C. EPA Recommendations To Further Improve the Rules
    D. Public Comment and Final Action
III. Statutory and Executive Order Reviews

I. The State's Submittal

A. What rules did the State submit?

    Table 1 lists the rules we are approving with the dates that they
were

adopted or amended by the local air agency and submitted by the
California Air Resources Board (CARB).

                                            Table 1--Submitted Rules
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
                                                                                Adopted/
             Local agency                  Rule No.            Rule title             Amended        Submitted
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
PCAPCD................................             231  Industrial,                     10/09/97        03/17/09
                                                         Institutional and
                                                         Commercial Boiler,
                                                         Steam Generator and
                                                         Process Heaters.
PCAPCD................................             242  Stationary Internal             04/10/03        12/07/10
                                                         Combustion Engines.
PCAPCD................................             246  Natural Gas-Fired Water         06/19/97        12/07/10
                                                         Heaters.
SMAQMD................................             414  Water Heaters, Boilers          03/25/10        04/05/11
                                                         and Process Heaters
                                                         Rated Less Than
                                                         1,000,000 BTU per hour.
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

    On April 20, 2009, EPA determined that the submittal for PCAPCD
Rule 231 met the completeness criteria in 40 CFR part 51 appendix V,
which must be met before formal EPA review. On January 13, 2011, EPA
determined that the submittal for PCAPCD Rules 242 and 246 met the
completeness criteria in 40 CFR part 51 appendix V, which must be met
before formal EPA review. On May 6, 2011, EPA determined that the
submittal for SMAQMD Rule 414 met the completeness criteria in 40 CFR
part 51 appendix V, which must be met before formal EPA review.

B. Are there other versions of these rules?

    There are no previous versions of Rules 231, 242 and 246 in the
SIP. The PCAPCD adopted an earlier version of Rule 231 on October 17,
1994, and CARB submitted it to us on October 19, 1994 but it was later
withdrawn. We approved an earlier version of SMAQMD Rule 414 into the
SIP on April 20, 1999 (64 FR 19277).

C. What is the purpose of the submitted rules?

    NOX helps produce ground-level ozone, smog and
particulate matter, which harm human health and the environment.
Section 110(a) of the CAA requires States to submit regulations that
control NOX emissions. Rule 231 limits emission of
NOX and carbon monoxide (CO) from boilers, steam generators
and process heaters fueled on liquid or gas fuels that are 5 MMBtu/hour
or larger. Rule 242 regulates emissions of NOX and CO from
internal combustion engines with a rated brake horse power of 50 or
greater. Rule 246 limits NOX emissions from natural gas
water heaters rated below 75,000 btu/hour. Rule 414 limits
NOX and CO emissions from boilers rated below 1 MMBtu/hour.
EPA's technical support documents (TSD) have more information about
these rules.

II. EPA's Evaluation and Action

A. How is EPA evaluating the rules?

    Generally, SIP rules must be enforceable (see section 110(a) of the
Act), must require Reasonably Available Control Technology (RACT) for
each category of sources covered by a Control Techniques Guidelines
(CTG) document as well as each NOX or VOC major source in
ozone nonattainment areas classified as moderate or above (see sections
182(b)(2) and 182(f)), and must not relax existing requirements in
violation of CAA sections 110(l) and 193. SIP rules must also implement
Reasonably Available Control Measures (RACM), including such reductions
in emissions from existing sources in the area as may be obtained
through the adoption, at a minimum, of reasonably available control
technology (RACT), as expeditiously as practicable for nonattainment
areas (see CAA section 172(c)(1)). The PCAPCD and SMAQMD regulate ozone
nonattainment areas classified as severe for the 8-hour ozone NAAQS (40
CFR 81.305), so Rules 231, 242, 246 and 414 must fulfill RACT and RACM
for NOX.
    Guidance and policy documents that we use to evaluate
enforceability, RACT and RACM requirements consistently include the
following:
    1. ``State Implementation Plans; General Preamble for the
Implementation of Title I of the Clean Air Act Amendments of 1990,'' 57
FR 13498 (April 16, 1992); 57 FR 18070 (April 28, 1992).
    2. ``State Implementation Plans; Nitrogen Oxides Supplement to the
General Preamble; Clean Air Act Amendments of 1990 Implementation of
Title I; Proposed Rule,'' (the NOX Supplement), 57 FR 55620,
November 25, 1992.
    3. ``Issues Relating to VOC Regulation Cutpoints, Deficiencies, and
Deviations,'' EPA, May 25, 1988 (the Bluebook).
    4. ``Guidance Document for Correcting Common VOC & Other Rule
Deficiencies,'' EPA Region 9, August 21, 2001 (the Little Bluebook).
    5. ``Determination of Reasonably Available Control Technology and
Best Available Retrofit Control Technology for Industrial,
Institutional, and Commercial Boilers, Steam Generators, and Process
Heaters'', CARB (July 18, 1991).
    6. ``Alternative Control Techniques Document--NOX
Emissions from Industrial/Commercial/Institutional (ICI) Boilers'', US
EPA 453/R-94-022 (March 1994).
    7. ``Alternative Control Techniques Document--NOX
Emissions from Utility Boilers'', US EPA 452/R-93-008 (March 1994).
    8. ``Alternative Control Techniques Document--NOX
Emissions from Stationary Reciprocating Internal Combustion Engines'',
US EPA 453/R-93-032 (July 1993).
    9. ``Determination of Reasonably Available Control Technology and
Best Available Retrofit Control Technology for Stationary Spark-Ignited
Internal Combustion Engines'', CARB (November 2001).

B. Do the rules meet the evaluation criteria?

    We believe these rules are consistent with the relevant policy and
guidance regarding enforceability and SIP relaxations. We are not
evaluating the RACM requirement in this action but believe that PCAPCD
and SMAQMD are required to evaluate any reasonably available control
measures for the sources covered by these rules. We believe Rule 231
implements RACT. We believe there are no sources subject to Rule 242
that exceed the major source threshold (25 tpy), thus it is not
required to meet RACT for NOX. For this reason, we are not
making a determination on RACT for Rule 242 in this action. Rules 246
and 414 are not subject to RACT requirements because they are
applicable to sources that are too small to exceed the major source
threshold. The TSDs have more information on our evaluation.

C. EPA Recommendations To Further Improve the Rules

    The TSDs describe additional rule revisions that we recommend for
the next time the local agencies modify the rules.

D. Public Comment and Final Action

    As authorized in section 110(k)(3) of the Act, EPA is fully
approving the submitted rules because we believe they fulfill all
relevant requirements. We do not think anyone will object to this
approval, so we are finalizing it without proposing it in advance.
However, in the Proposed Rules section of this Federal Register, we are
simultaneously proposing approval of the same submitted rules. If we
receive adverse comments by December 1, 2011, we will publish a timely
withdrawal in the Federal Register to notify the public that the direct
final approval will not take effect and we will address the comments in
a subsequent final action based on the proposal. If we do not receive
timely adverse comments, the direct final approval will be effective
without further notice on January 3, 2012. This will incorporate these
rules into the federally enforceable SIP.
    Please note that if EPA receives adverse comment on an amendment,
paragraph, or section of this rule and if that provision may be severed
from the remainder of the rule, EPA may adopt as final those provisions
of the rule that are not the subject of an adverse comment.

III. Statutory and Executive Order Reviews

    Under the Clean Air Act, the Administrator is required to approve a
SIP submission that complies with the provisions of the Act and
applicable Federal regulations. 42 U.S.C. 7410(k); 40 CFR 52.02(a).
Thus, in reviewing SIP submissions, EPA's role is to approve State
choices, provided that they meet the criteria of the Clean Air Act.
Accordingly, this action merely approves State law as meeting Federal
requirements and does not impose additional requirements beyond those
imposed by State law. For that reason, this action:
     Is not a ``significant regulatory action'' subject to
review by the Office of Management and Budget under Executive Order
12866 (58 FR 51735, October 4, 1993);
     Does not impose an information collection burden under the
provisions of the Paperwork Reduction Act (44 U.S.C. 3501 et seq.);
     Is certified as not having a significant economic impact
on a substantial number of small entities under the Regulatory
Flexibility Act (5 U.S.C. 601 et seq.);
     Does not contain any unfunded mandate or significantly or
uniquely affect small governments, as described in the Unfunded
Mandates Reform Act of 1995 (Pub. L. 104-4);
     Does not have Federalism implications as specified in
Executive Order 13132 (64 FR 43255, August 10, 1999);
     Is not an economically significant regulatory action based
on health or safety risks subject to Executive Order 13045 (62 FR
19885, April 23, 1997);
     Is not a significant regulatory action subject to
Executive Order 13211 (66 FR 28355, May 22, 2001);
     Is not subject to requirements of Section 12(d) of the
National Technology Transfer and Advancement Act of 1995 (15 U.S.C. 272
note) because application of those requirements would be inconsistent
with the Clean Air Act; and
     Does not provide EPA with the discretionary authority to
address disproportionate human health or environmental effects with
practical, appropriate, and legally permissible methods under Executive
Order 12898 (59 FR 7629, February 16, 1994).

In addition, this rule does not have tribal implications as specified
by Executive Order 13175 (65 FR 67249, November 9, 2000), because the
SIP is not approved to apply in Indian country located in the State,
and EPA notes that it will not impose substantial direct costs on
tribal governments or preempt tribal law.
    The Congressional Review Act, 5 U.S.C. 801 et seq., as added by the
Small Business Regulatory Enforcement Fairness Act of 1996, generally
provides that before a rule may take effect, the agency promulgating
the rule must submit a rule report, which includes a copy of the rule,
to each House of the Congress and to the Comptroller General of the
United States. EPA will submit a report containing this action and
other required information to the U.S. Senate, the U.S. House of
Representatives, and the Comptroller General of the United States prior
to publication of the rule in the Federal Register. A major rule cannot
take effect until 60 days after it is published in the Federal
Register. This action is not a ``major rule'' as defined by 5 U.S.C.
804(2).
    Under section 307(b)(1) of the Clean Air Act, petitions for
judicial review of this action must be filed in the United States Court
of Appeals for the appropriate circuit by January 3, 2012. Filing a
petition for reconsideration by the Administrator of this final rule
does not affect the finality of this action for the purposes of
judicial review nor does it extend the time within which a petition for
judicial review may be filed, and shall not postpone the effectiveness
of such rule or action. Parties with objections to this direct final
rule are encouraged to file a comment in response to the parallel
notice of proposed rulemaking for this action published in the Proposed
Rules section of today's Federal Register, rather than file an
immediate petition for judicial review of this direct final rule, so
that EPA can withdraw this direct final rule and address the comment in
the proposed rulemaking. This action may not be challenged later in
proceedings to enforce its requirements (see section 307(b)(2)).

List of Subjects in 40 CFR Part 52

    Environmental protection, Air pollution control, Incorporation by
reference, Intergovernmental relations, Nitrogen dioxide, Ozone,
Particulate matter, Reporting and recordkeeping requirements.

    Dated: September 28, 2011.
Keith Takata,
Acting Regional Administrator, Region IX.

    Part 52, chapter I, title 40 of the Code of Federal Regulations is
amended as follows:

PART 52--[AMENDED]

0
1. The authority citation for Part 52 continues to read as follows:

    Authority:  42 U.S.C. 7401 et seq.

Subpart F--California

0
2. Section 52.220 is amended by adding paragraphs (c)(363)(i)(D),
(388)(i)(D)(2), and (389)(i)(B)(2) and (3) to read as follows:

Sec.  52.220  Identification of plan.

* * * * *
    (c) * * *
    (363) * * *
    (i) * * *
    (D) Placer County Air Pollution Control District.
    (1) Rule 231, ``Industrial, Institutional and Commercial Boiler,
Steam Generator and Process Heaters,'' amended on October 9, 1997.
* * * * *
    (388) * * *
    (i) * * *
    (D) * * *
    (2) Rule 414, ``Water Heaters, Boilers and Process Heaters Rated
Less Than 1,000,000 BTU per hour,'' amended on March 25, 2010.
* * * * *

    (389) * * *
    (i) * * *
    (B) * * *
    (2) Rule 242, ``Stationary Internal Combustion Engines,'' adopted
on April 10, 2003.
    (3) Rule 246, ``Natural Gas-Fired Water Heaters,'' adopted on June
19, 1997.
* * * * *
[FR Doc. 2011-28246 Filed 10-31-11; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6560-50-P


[Federal Register Volume 85, Number 54 (Thursday, March 19, 2020)]
[Notices]
[Pages 15829-15830]
[FR Doc No: 2020-05678]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

[Release No. 34-88379; File No. SR-ICC-2020-002]

Self-Regulatory Organizations; ICE Clear Credit LLC; Notice of
Designation of Longer Period for Commission Action on Proposed Rule
Change Relating to the ICC Risk Management Model Description, ICC
Stress Testing Framework, ICC Liquidity Risk Management Framework, ICC
Back-Testing Framework, and ICC Risk Parameter Setting and Review
Policy

March 13, 2020.
    On January 14, 2020, ICE Clear Credit LLC (``ICC''), filed with the
Securities

and Exchange Commission (``Commission''), pursuant to Section 19(b)(1)
of the Securities Exchange Act (``Act'') \1\ and Rule 19b-4
thereunder,\2\ a proposed rule change to amend its rules to make
certain changes to the Risk Management Model Description, Stress
Testing Framework, Liquidity Risk Management Framework, Back-Testing
Framework, and Risk Parameter Setting and Review Policy in connection
with the clearing of credit default index swaptions. The proposed rule
change was published for comment in the Federal Register on January 31,
2020.\3\ To date, the Commission has not received comments on the
proposed rule change.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \1\ 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(1).
    \2\ 17 CFR 240.19b-4.
    \3\ Securities Exchange Act Release No. 88047 (Jan. 27, 2020),
85 FR 5756 (Jan. 31, 2020) (SR-ICC-2020-002).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    Section 19(b)(2) of the Act \4\ provides that within 45 days of the
publication of notice of the filing of a proposed rule change, or
within such longer period up to 90 days as the Commission may designate
if it finds such longer period to be appropriate and publishes its
reasons for so finding or as to which the self-regulatory organization
consents, the Commission shall either approve the proposed rule change,
disapprove the proposed rule change, or institute proceedings to
determine whether the proposed rule change should be disapproved. The
45th day from the publication of notice of filing of this proposed rule
change is March 16, 2020.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \4\ 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(2).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    The Commission is extending the 45-day time period for Commission
action on the proposed rule change, in which ICC would make the changes
noted above. The Commission finds it is appropriate to designate a
longer period within which to take action on the proposed rule change
so that it has sufficient time to consider ICC's proposed rule change.
    Accordingly, pursuant to Section 19(b)(2) \5\ of the Act, and for
the reasons discussed above, the Commission designates April 30, 2020,
as the date by which the Commission should either approve or
disapprove, or institute proceedings to determine whether to
disapprove, the proposed rule change (File No. SR-ICC-2020-002).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \5\ 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(2).

    For the Commission, by the Division of Trading and Markets,
pursuant to delegated authority.\6\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \6\ 17 CFR 200.30-3(a)(31).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

J. Matthew DeLesDernier,
Assistant Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2020-05678 Filed 3-18-20; 8:45 am]
 BILLING CODE 8011-01-P