[Federal Register Volume 84, Number 111 (Monday, June 10, 2019)]
[Proposed Rules]
[Pages 26804-26806]
[FR Doc No: 2019-12177]

=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY

40 CFR Part 52

[EPA-R09-OAR-2019-0105; FRL-994-97-Region 9]

Air Plan Approval; Arizona; Maricopa County Air Quality
Department

AGENCY: Environmental Protection Agency (EPA).

ACTION: Proposed rule.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) is proposing to
approve revisions to the Maricopa County Air Quality Department (MCAQD)
portion of the Arizona State Implementation Plan (SIP). These revisions
concern emissions of volatile organic compounds (VOCs) from graphic
arts and from coating of wood furniture and fixtures. We are proposing
to approve two local rules to regulate these emission sources under the
Clean Air Act (CAA or the Act). We are taking comments on this proposal
and plan to follow with a final action.

DATES: Any comments must arrive by July 10, 2019.

ADDRESSES: Submit your comments, identified by Docket ID No. EPA-R09-
OAR-2019-0105 at https://www.regulations.gov. For comments submitted at
Regulations.gov, follow the online instructions for submitting
comments. Once submitted, comments cannot be edited or removed from
Regulations.gov. The EPA may publish any comment received to its public
docket. Do not submit electronically any information you consider to be
Confidential Business Information (CBI) or other information whose
disclosure is restricted by statute. Multimedia submissions (audio,
video, etc.) must be accompanied by a written comment. The written
comment is considered the official comment and should include
discussion of all points you wish to make. The EPA will generally not
consider comments or comment contents located outside of the primary
submission (i.e., on the web, cloud, or other file sharing system). For
additional submission methods, please contact the person identified in
the FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT section. For the full EPA public
comment policy, information about CBI or multimedia submissions, and
general guidance on making effective comments, please visit https://www.epa.gov/dockets/commenting-epa-dockets.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Nicole Law or Robert Schwartz, EPA
Region IX, 75 Hawthorne Street, San Francisco, CA 94105,<PHONE_NUMBER>
or<PHONE_NUMBER><EMAIL_ADDRESS>or b6c5d5dec1d7c4c2cc98c4d9d4d3c4c2f6d3c6d798d1d9c0.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Throughout this document, ``we,'' ``us'' and
``our'' refer to the EPA.

Table of Contents

I. The State's Submittal
    A. What rules did the State submit?
    B. Are there other versions of these rules?
    C. What is the purpose of the submitted rule revisions?
II. The EPA's Evaluation and Action
    A. How is the EPA evaluating the rules?
    B. Do the rules meet the evaluation criteria?
    C. The EPA's Recommendations To Further Improve the Rules
    D. Public Comment and Proposed Action
III. Incorporation by Reference
IV. Statutory and Executive Order Reviews

I. The State's Submittal

A. What rules did the State submit?

    Table 1 lists the rules addressed by this proposal with the dates
that they were adopted by the local air agency and submitted by the
Arizona Department of Environmental Quality.

                                            Table 1--Submitted Rules
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
                                                                                Adopted/
         Local agency                    Rule No.                 Rule title         amended/        Submitted
                                                                                revised
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
MCAQD........................  337.........................  Graphic Arts.......      08/17/2011      01/15/2014
MCAQD........................  342.........................  Coating Wood             11/02/2016      06/22/2017
                                                              Furniture and
                                                              Fixtures.
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

    On March 5, 2014, the EPA determined that the submittal for MCAQD
Rule 337 met the completeness criteria in 40 CFR part 51 Appendix V,
which must be met before formal EPA review.
    On December 22, 2017, the submittal for MCAQD Rule 342 was deemed
by operation of law to meet the completeness criteria in 40 CFR part 51
Appendix V, which must be met before formal EPA review.

B. Are there other versions of these rules?

    We approved earlier versions of Rule 337 and Rule 342 into the SIP
on February 9, 1998 (63 FR 6489). The MCAQD adopted revisions to the
SIP-approved version of Rule 337 on August

17, 2011, and the Arizona Department of Environmental Quality (ADEQ)
submitted them to us on January 15, 2014. The MCAQD adopted revisions
to the SIP-approved version of Rule 342 on November 2, 2016, and the
ADEQ submitted them to us on June 22, 2017.

C. What is the purpose of the submitted rule revisions?

    Emissions of VOCs contribute to ground-level ozone (``smog'') and
particulate matter, which harm human health and the environment.
Section 110(a) of the CAA requires states to submit regulations that
control VOC emissions. The current SIP-approved Rule 337 contains VOC
limits for various graphic arts materials and cleaning solutions
associated with lithographic printing. It also contains requirements
pertaining to labeling, operation and maintenance plans, monitoring,
recordkeeping, reporting, and test methods. The submitted revisions
expand requirements for specific types of graphic arts operations such
as lithographic and letter press operations, rotogravure and
flexographic operations, and screen-printing operations. A work
practice section was also added describing VOC material use, storage
and disposal, and minimization of spills.
    The current SIP-approved Rule 342 establishes VOC content limits
and workplace standards for all persons involved in the surface
preparation and coating of wood furniture and fixtures. Revisions to
the SIP-approved rule include the addition of leak detection and repair
requirements, annual operator training requirements, and more
comprehensive recordkeeping requirements; updates to definitions;
revised test methods; and removal of outdated compliance dates and
spray gun tagging requirements. The EPA's technical support documents
(TSDs) have more information about these rules.

II. The EPA's Evaluation and Action

A. How is the EPA evaluating the rules?

    Rules in the SIP must be enforceable (see CAA section 110(a)(2)),
must not interfere with applicable requirements concerning attainment
and reasonable further progress or other CAA requirements (see CAA
section 110(l)), and must not modify certain SIP control requirements
in nonattainment areas without ensuring equivalent or greater emissions
reductions (see CAA section 193).
    Generally, SIP rules must require Reasonably Available Control
Technology (RACT) for each category of sources covered by a Control
Techniques Guidelines (CTG) document as well as each major source of
VOCs in ozone nonattainment areas classified as Moderate or above (see
CAA section 182(b)(2)). The MCAQD regulates an ozone nonattainment area
classified as Moderate for the 2008 8-hour ozone NAAQS (40 CFR 81.303).
Therefore, these rules must implement RACT.
    Guidance and policy documents that we used to evaluate
enforceability, revision/relaxation and rule stringency requirements
for the applicable criteria pollutants include the following:

    1. ``State Implementation Plans; General Preamble for the
Implementation of Title I of the Clean Air Act Amendments of 1990,''
57 FR 13498 (April 16, 1992); 57 FR 18070 (April 28, 1992).
    2. ``Issues Relating to VOC Regulation Cutpoints, Deficiencies,
and Deviations,'' EPA, May 25, 1988 (the Bluebook, revised January
11, 1990).
    3. ``Guidance Document for Correcting Common VOC & Other Rule
Deficiencies,'' EPA Region 9, August 21, 2001 (the Little Bluebook).
    4. ``Control of Volatile Organic Compound Emissions from Wood
Furniture Manufacturing Operations,'' EPA-453/R-96-007, April 1996.
    5. ``Control of Volatile Organic Emissions from Existing
Stationary Sources--Volume VIII: Graphic Arts--Rotogravure and
Flexography,'' EPA-450/2-78-033, December 1978.
    6. ``Control Techniques Guidelines for Offset Lithographic
Printing and Letterpress Printing,'' EPA 453/R-06-002, September
2006.

B. Do the rules meet the evaluation criteria?

    These rules are consistent with CAA requirements and relevant
guidance regarding enforceability, RACT and SIP revisions. The TSDs
have more information on our evaluation.

C. The EPA's Recommendations To Further Improve the Rules

    The TSDs include recommendations for the next time the local agency
modifies the rules.

D. Public Comment and Proposed Action

    As authorized in section 110(k)(3) of the Act, the EPA proposes to
fully approve the submitted rules because they fulfill all relevant
requirements. We will accept comments from the public on this proposal
until July 10, 2019. If we take final action to approve the submitted
rules, our final action will incorporate these rules into the federally
enforceable SIP.

III. Incorporation by Reference

    In this rule, the EPA is proposing to include in a final EPA rule
regulatory text that includes incorporation by reference. In accordance
with requirements of 1 CFR 51.5, the EPA is proposing to incorporate by
reference the MCAQD rules described in Table 1 of this preamble. The
EPA has made, and will continue to make, these materials available
through www.regulations.gov and at the EPA Region IX Office (please
contact the persons identified in the FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT
section of this preamble for more information).

IV. Statutory and Executive Order Reviews

    Under the Clean Air Act, the Administrator is required to approve a
SIP submission that complies with the provisions of the Act and
applicable federal regulations. 42 U.S.C. 7410(k); 40 CFR 52.02(a).
Thus, in reviewing SIP submissions, the EPA's role is to approve state
choices, provided that they meet the criteria of the Clean Air Act.
Accordingly, this proposed action merely proposes to approve state law
as meeting federal requirements and does not impose additional
requirements beyond those imposed by state law. For that reason, this
proposed action:
     Is not a ``significant regulatory action'' subject to
review by the Office of Management and Budget under Executive Orders
12866 (58 FR 51735, October 4, 1993) and 13563 (76 FR 3821, January 21,
2011);
     is not an Executive Order 13771 (82 FR 9339, February 2,
2017) regulatory action because SIP approvals are exempted under
Executive Order 12866;
     does not impose an information collection burden under the
provisions of the Paperwork Reduction Act (44 U.S.C. 3501 et seq.);
     is certified as not having a significant economic impact
on a substantial number of small entities under the Regulatory
Flexibility Act (5 U.S.C. 601 et seq.);
     does not contain any unfunded mandate or significantly or
uniquely affect small governments, as described in the Unfunded
Mandates Reform Act of 1995 (Pub. L. 104-4);
     does not have Federalism implications as specified in
Executive Order 13132 (64 FR 43255, August 10, 1999);
     is not an economically significant regulatory action based
on health or safety risks subject to Executive Order 13045 (62 FR
19885, April 23, 1997);
     is not a significant regulatory action subject to
Executive Order 13211 (66 FR 28355, May 22, 2001);
     is not subject to requirements of Section 12(d) of the
National Technology Transfer and Advancement

Act of 1995 (15 U.S.C. 272 note) because application of those
requirements would be inconsistent with the Clean Air Act; and
     does not provide the EPA with the discretionary authority
to address disproportionate human health or environmental effects with
practical, appropriate, and legally permissible methods under Executive
Order 12898 (59 FR 7629, February 16, 1994).
    In addition, the SIP is not approved to apply on any Indian
reservation land or in any other area where the EPA or an Indian tribe
has demonstrated that a tribe has jurisdiction. In those areas of
Indian country, the rule does not have tribal implications and will not
impose substantial direct costs on tribal governments or preempt tribal
law as specified by Executive Order 13175 (65 FR 67249, November 9,
2000).

List of Subjects in 40 CFR Part 52

    Environmental protection, Air pollution control, Incorporation by
reference, Intergovernmental relations, Ozone, Particulate matter,
Reporting and recordkeeping requirements, Volatile organic compounds.

    Authority: 42 U.S.C. 7401 et seq.

    Dated: May 29, 2019.
Deborah Jordan,
Acting Regional Administrator, Region IX.
[FR Doc. 2019-12177 Filed 6-7-19; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6560-50-P


Cooling Water Intake Structure ( CWIS) Information Data Required Rig Information Rig Name ENSCO 25 ENSCO 26 ENSCO 29 Rig Type Transportable Platform Rig ( ENSCO 25 & ENSCO 29) Platform Rig on SPAR Buoy ( ENSCO 26) Total Installed Power Generation Capacity 6250 HP ( ENSCO 25 & ENSCO 29) 7200 HP ( ENSCO 26)

Number of Cooling Water Intake Structures ( CWISs) 2 Brief description of each CWIS ( e. g., sea chest, simple pipe) Raw Water Tower Deep Well Pumps Rough dimensions of each CWIS and indicate whether onboard CWIS has an existing flange 2ea raw water tower pumps, 2 / 3 stage w/ 75 hp motors pump rated 1300 gpm with 10" suction at 20' to 50' Screen type ( e. g., strainer, wedge wire) with mesh size Basket Strainers, ¼ " Mesh on pump itself Total Design Specifications for Daily Maximum Water Intake Volume of each CWIS 1,871,940 gals ( 44,570 bbls)

Total Daily Water Intake Volume of each CWIS ( Set up/ Drilling) 1,871,940 gals ( 44,570 bbls)

Design Specs for Through Screen Velocity of each CWIS ( i. e., Q= V* A) ( Set up/ Drilling) 5.50 fps List of Purposes of Cooling Water Intakes ( e. g., cool crude oil, produced water, power generators, drill pipe brakes) Brake water cooling and 5 heat exchangers for main engines List of Purposes of Non cooling Water Intakes ( e. g., fire water, hotel loads) Fire main, sanitary, mud pits, shakers Total Volume of Water Intake for Ballasting, Duration of the Ballast intake, and the Through Screen Velocity of the Ballast intake Not applicable Mitigation Measures for reducing Exotic Species Migration through Ballast water Not applicable Mitigation Measures for reducing Impingement and Entrainment of Aquatic Organisms, as well as Bio fouling Prevention Measures Sea chest screens, and baskets, cathodic protection Is the Rig equipped with a Radiator Cooling System for the Main Engines? Yes, heat exchangers for main engines


[Federal Register Volume 82, Number 163 (Thursday, August 24, 2017)]
[Notices]
[Pages 40215-40221]
[FR Doc No: 2017-17937]

=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION

Federal Motor Carrier Safety Administration

[Docket No. FMCSA-2017-0042]

Qualification of Drivers; Exemption Applications; Diabetes
Mellitus

AGENCY: Federal Motor Carrier Safety Administration (FMCSA), DOT.

ACTION: Notice of applications for exemption; request for comments.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: FMCSA announces receipt of applications from 43 individuals
for an exemption from the prohibition in the Federal Motor Carrier
Safety Regulations (FMCSRs) against persons with insulin-treated
diabetes mellitus (ITDM) operating a commercial motor vehicle (CMV) in
interstate commerce. If granted, the exemptions would enable these
individuals with ITDM to operate CMVs in interstate commerce.

DATES: Comments must be received on or before September 25, 2017.

ADDRESSES: You may submit comments bearing the Federal Docket
Management System (FDMS) Docket No. FMCSA-2017-0042 using any of the
following methods:
     Federal eRulemaking Portal: Go to http://www.regulations.gov. Follow the online instructions for submitting
comments.
     Mail: Docket Management Facility; U.S. Department of
Transportation, 1200 New Jersey Avenue SE., West Building Ground Floor,
Room W12-140, Washington, DC 20590-0001.
     Hand Delivery: West Building Ground Floor, Room W12-140,
1200 New Jersey Avenue SE., Washington, DC, between 9 a.m. and 5 p.m.,
e.t., Monday through Friday, except Federal holidays.
     Fax: 1-202-493-2251.
    Instructions: Each submission must include the Agency name and the
docket number(s) for this notice. Note that all comments received will
be posted without change to http://www.regulations.gov, including any
personal information provided. Please see the Privacy Act heading below
for further information.
    Docket: For access to the docket to read background documents or
comments, go to http://www.regulations.gov at any time or Room W12-140
on the ground level of the West Building, 1200 New Jersey Avenue SE.,
Washington, DC, between 9 a.m. and 5 p.m., e.t., Monday through Friday,
except Federal holidays. The FDMS is available 24 hours each day e.t.,
365 days each year. If you want acknowledgment that we received your
comments, please include a self-addressed, stamped envelope or postcard
or print the acknowledgement page that appears after submitting
comments online.
    Privacy Act: In accordance with 5 U.S.C. 553(c), DOT solicits
comments from the public to better inform its rulemaking process. DOT
posts these comments, without edit, including any personal information
the commenter provides, to http://www.regulations.gov, as described in
the system of records notice (DOT/ALL-14 FDMS), which can be reviewed
at http://www.dot.gov/privacy.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Ms. Christine A. Hydock, Chief,
Medical Programs Division,<PHONE_NUMBER><EMAIL_ADDRESS>FMCSA,
Department of Transportation, 1200 New Jersey Avenue SE., Room W64-224,
Washington, DC 20590-0001. Office hours are 8:30 a.m. to 5 p.m., e.t.,
Monday through Friday, except Federal holidays. If you have questions
regarding viewing or submitting material to the docket, contact Docket
Services, telephone<PHONE_NUMBER>.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

I. Background

    Under 49 U.S.C. 31136(e) and 31315, FMCSA may grant an exemption
from the FMCSRs for a two-year period if it finds ``such exemption
would likely achieve a level of safety that is equivalent to or greater
than the level that would be achieved absent such exemption.'' The
statute also allows the Agency to renew exemptions at the end of the
two-year period.
    The 43 individuals listed in this notice have requested an
exemption from the diabetes prohibition in 49 CFR 391.41(b)(3).
Accordingly, the Agency will evaluate the qualifications of each
applicant to determine whether granting the exemption will achieve the
required level of safety mandated by statute.
    The physical qualification standard for drivers regarding diabetes
found in 49 CFR 391.41(b)(3) states that a person is physically
qualified to drive a CMV if that person:
    Has no established medical history or clinical diagnosis of
diabetes mellitus currently requiring insulin for control.
    The Agency established the current requirement for diabetes in 1970
because several risk studies indicated that drivers with diabetes had a
higher rate of crash involvement than the general population.
    FMCSA established its diabetes exemption program, based on the
Agency's July 2000 study entitled ``A Report to Congress on the
Feasibility of a Program to Qualify Individuals with Insulin-Treated
Diabetes Mellitus to Operate in Interstate Commerce as Directed by the
Transportation Act for the 21st Century.'' The report concluded that a
safe and practicable protocol to allow some drivers with ITDM to
operate CMVs is feasible. The September 3, 2003 (68 FR 52441), Federal
Register notice in conjunction with the November 8, 2005 (70 FR 67777),
Federal Register notice provides the current protocol for allowing such
drivers to operate CMVs in interstate commerce.
    FMCSA notes that section 4129 of the Safe, Accountable, Flexible
and Efficient Transportation Equity Act: A Legacy for Users requires
the Secretary to revise its diabetes exemption program established on
September 3, 2003 (68 FR

52441). The revision must provide for individual assessment of drivers
with diabetes mellitus, and be consistent with the criteria described
in section 4018 of the Transportation Equity Act for the 21st Century
(49 U.S.C. 31305).
    Section 4129 requires: (1) Elimination of the requirement for three
years of experience operating CMVs while being treated with insulin;
and (2) establishment of a specified minimum period of insulin use to
demonstrate stable control of diabetes before being allowed to operate
a CMV.
    In response to section 4129, FMCSA made immediate revisions to the
diabetes exemption program established by the September 3, 2003 notice.
FMCSA discontinued use of the three year driving experience and
fulfilled the requirements of section 4129 while continuing to ensure
that operation of CMVs by drivers with ITDM will achieve the requisite
level of safety required of all exemptions granted under 49 U.S.C.
31136 (e).
    Section 4129(d) also directed FMCSA to ensure that drivers of CMVs
with ITDM are not held to a higher standard than other drivers, with
the exception of limited operating, monitoring and medical requirements
that are deemed medically necessary.
    The FMCSA concluded that all of the operating, monitoring and
medical requirements set out in the September 3, 2003 notice, except as
modified, were in compliance with section 4129(d). Therefore, all of
the requirements set out in the September 3, 2003 notice, except as
modified by the notice in the Federal Register on November 8, 2005 (70
FR 67777), remain in effect.

II. Qualifications of Applicants

David G. Anderton

    Mr. Anderton, 58, has had ITDM since 2015. His endocrinologist
examined him in 2017 and certified that he has had no severe
hypoglycemic reactions resulting in loss of consciousness, requiring
the assistance of another person, or resulting in impaired cognitive
function that occurred without warning in the past 12 months and no
recurrent (two or more) severe hypoglycemic episodes in the last five
years. His endocrinologist certifies that Mr. Anderton understands
diabetes management and monitoring, has stable control of his diabetes
using insulin, and is able to drive a CMV safely. Mr. Anderton meets
the requirements of the vision standard at 49 CFR 391.41(b)(10). His
optometrist examined him in 2017 and certified that he does not have
diabetic retinopathy. He holds a Class B CDL from Alaska.

John N. Bailey, III

    Mr. Bailey, 63, has had ITDM since 2009. His endocrinologist
examined him in 2017 and certified that he has had no severe
hypoglycemic reactions resulting in loss of consciousness, requiring
the assistance of another person, or resulting in impaired cognitive
function that occurred without warning in the past 12 months and no
recurrent (two or more) severe hypoglycemic episodes in the last five
years. His endocrinologist certifies that Mr. Bailey understands
diabetes management and monitoring, has stable control of his diabetes
using insulin, and is able to drive a CMV safely. Mr. Bailey meets the
requirements of the vision standard at 49 CFR 391.41(b)(10). His
ophthalmologist examined him in 2017 and certified that he has stable
nonproliferative diabetic retinopathy. He holds a Class A CDL from
Florida.

Wells R. Betts

    Mr. Betts, 55, has had ITDM since 2013. His endocrinologist
examined him in 2017 and certified that he has had no severe
hypoglycemic reactions resulting in loss of consciousness, requiring
the assistance of another person, or resulting in impaired cognitive
function that occurred without warning in the past 12 months and no
recurrent (two or more) severe hypoglycemic episodes in the last five
years. His endocrinologist certifies that Mr. Betts understands
diabetes management and monitoring, has stable control of his diabetes
using insulin, and is able to drive a CMV safely. Mr. Betts meets the
requirements of the vision standard at 49 CFR 391.41(b)(10). His
ophthalmologist examined him in 2017 and certified that he has stable
nonproliferative diabetic retinopathy. He holds a Class A CDL from
Delaware.

Clyde R. Bigam, Jr.

    Mr. Bigam, 75, has had ITDM since 2016. His endocrinologist
examined him in 2017 and certified that he has had no severe
hypoglycemic reactions resulting in loss of consciousness, requiring
the assistance of another person, or resulting in impaired cognitive
function that occurred without warning in the past 12 months and no
recurrent (two or more) severe hypoglycemic episodes in the last five
years. His endocrinologist certifies that Mr. Bigam understands
diabetes management and monitoring, has stable control of his diabetes
using insulin, and is able to drive a CMV safely. Mr. Bigam meets the
requirements of the vision standard at 49 CFR 391.41(b)(10). His
optometrist examined him in 2017 and certified that he does not have
diabetic retinopathy. He holds a Class A CDL from Kansas.

Sten R. Brote

    Mr. Brote, 63, has had ITDM since 2013. His endocrinologist
examined him in 2017 and certified that he has had no severe
hypoglycemic reactions resulting in loss of consciousness, requiring
the assistance of another person, or resulting in impaired cognitive
function that occurred without warning in the past 12 months and no
recurrent (two or more) severe hypoglycemic episodes in the last five
years. His endocrinologist certifies that Mr. Brote understands
diabetes management and monitoring, has stable control of his diabetes
using insulin, and is able to drive a CMV safely. Mr. Brote meets the
requirements of the vision standard at 49 CFR 391.41(b)(10). His
optometrist examined him in 2017 and certified that he does not have
diabetic retinopathy. He holds a Class A CDL from Massachusetts.

Michele D. Budrys

    Ms. Budrys, 62, has had ITDM since 2014. Her endocrinologist
examined her in 2017 and certified that she has had no severe
hypoglycemic reactions resulting in loss of consciousness, requiring
the assistance of another person, or resulting in impaired cognitive
function that occurred without warning in the past 12 months and no
recurrent (two or more) severe hypoglycemic episodes in the last five
years. Her endocrinologist certifies that Ms. Budrys understands
diabetes management and monitoring has stable control of her diabetes
using insulin, and is able to drive a CMV safely. Ms. Budrys meets the
requirements of the vision standard at 49 CFR 391.41(b)(10). Her
optometrist examined her in 2017 and certified that she does not have
diabetic retinopathy. She holds an operator's license from
Massachusetts.

Keith P. Burk

    Mr. Burk, 55, has had ITDM since 2012. His endocrinologist examined
him in 2017 and certified that he has had no severe hypoglycemic
reactions resulting in loss of consciousness, requiring the assistance
of another person, or resulting in impaired cognitive function that
occurred without warning in the past 12 months and no recurrent (two or
more) severe hypoglycemic episodes in the last five years. His
endocrinologist certifies that Mr. Burk understands diabetes management
and monitoring, has stable control of his diabetes using insulin, and
is able to drive a CMV safely. Mr. Burk meets the requirements of the
vision standard at 49 CFR 391.41(b)(10). His optometrist examined

him in 2017 and certified that he does not have diabetic retinopathy.
He holds an operator's license from Pennsylvania.

Robert E. Conner

    Mr. Conner, 69, has had ITDM since 2016. His endocrinologist
examined him in 2017 and certified that he has had no severe
hypoglycemic reactions resulting in loss of consciousness, requiring
the assistance of another person, or resulting in impaired cognitive
function that occurred without warning in the past 12 months and no
recurrent (two or more) severe hypoglycemic episodes in the last five
years. His endocrinologist certifies that Mr. Conner understands
diabetes management and monitoring, has stable control of his diabetes
using insulin, and is able to drive a CMV safely. Mr. Conner meets the
requirements of the vision standard at 49 CFR 391.41(b)(10). His
optometrist examined him in 2017 and certified that he does not have
diabetic retinopathy. He holds an operator's license from Ohio.

George L. Coombs, Jr.

    Mr. Coombs, 59, has had ITDM since 2013. His endocrinologist
examined him in 2017 and certified that he has had no severe
hypoglycemic reactions resulting in loss of consciousness, requiring
the assistance of another person, or resulting in impaired cognitive
function that occurred without warning in the past 12 months and no
recurrent (two or more) severe hypoglycemic episodes in the last five
years. His endocrinologist certifies that Mr. Coombs understands
diabetes management and monitoring, has stable control of his diabetes
using insulin, and is able to drive a CMV safely. Mr. Coombs meets the
requirements of the vision standard at 49 CFR 391.41(b)(10). His
ophthalmologist examined him in 2017 and certified that he has stable
nonproliferative diabetic retinopathy. He holds a Class A CDL from New
Hampshire.

Isaiah B. Deal

    Mr. Deal, 28, has had ITDM since 2017. His endocrinologist examined
him in 2017 and certified that he has had no severe hypoglycemic
reactions resulting in loss of consciousness, requiring the assistance
of another person, or resulting in impaired cognitive function that
occurred without warning in the past 12 months and no recurrent (two or
more) severe hypoglycemic episodes in the last five years. His
endocrinologist certifies that Mr. Deal understands diabetes management
and monitoring, has stable control of his diabetes using insulin, and
is able to drive a CMV safely. Mr. Deal meets the requirements of the
vision standard at 49 CFR 391.41(b)(10). His optometrist examined him
in 2017 and certified that he does not have diabetic retinopathy. He
holds a Class A CDL from North Dakota.

James M. Doiron

    Mr. Doiron, 51, has had ITDM since 2015. His endocrinologist
examined him in 2017 and certified that he has had no severe
hypoglycemic reactions resulting in loss of consciousness, requiring
the assistance of another person, or resulting in impaired cognitive
function that occurred without warning in the past 12 months and no
recurrent (two or more) severe hypoglycemic episodes in the last five
years. His endocrinologist certifies that Mr. Doiron understands
diabetes management and monitoring, has stable control of his diabetes
using insulin, and is able to drive a CMV safely. Mr. Doiron meets the
requirements of the vision standard at 49 CFR 391.41(b)(10). His
optometrist examined him in 2017 and certified that he does not have
diabetic retinopathy. He holds an operator's license from Florida.

Daniel T. Gazalie

    Mr. Gazalie, 60, has had ITDM since 2000. His endocrinologist
examined him in 2017 and certified that he has had no severe
hypoglycemic reactions resulting in loss of consciousness, requiring
the assistance of another person, or resulting in impaired cognitive
function that occurred without warning in the past 12 months and no
recurrent (two or more) severe hypoglycemic episodes in the last five
years. His endocrinologist certifies that Mr. Gazalie understands
diabetes management and monitoring, has stable control of his diabetes
using insulin, and is able to drive a CMV safely. Mr. Gazalie meets the
requirements of the vision standard at 49 CFR 391.41(b)(10). His
ophthalmologist examined him in 2017 and certified that he does not
have diabetic retinopathy. He holds a Class A CDL from Pennsylvania.

Gary V. Grimm

    Mr. Grimm, 33, has had ITDM since 2004. His endocrinologist
examined him in 2017 and certified that he has had no severe
hypoglycemic reactions resulting in loss of consciousness, requiring
the assistance of another person, or resulting in impaired cognitive
function that occurred without warning in the past 12 months and no
recurrent (two or more) severe hypoglycemic episodes in the last five
years. His endocrinologist certifies that Mr. Grimm understands
diabetes management and monitoring, has stable control of his diabetes
using insulin, and is able to drive a CMV safely. Mr. Grimm meets the
requirements of the vision standard at 49 CFR 391.41(b)(10). His
ophthalmologist examined him in 2017 and certified that he has stable
nonproliferative diabetic retinopathy. He holds an operator's license
from California.

Joe A. Gritten

    Mr. Gritten, 56, has had ITDM since 2015. His endocrinologist
examined him in 2017 and certified that he has had no severe
hypoglycemic reactions resulting in loss of consciousness, requiring
the assistance of another person, or resulting in impaired cognitive
function that occurred without warning in the past 12 months and no
recurrent (two or more) severe hypoglycemic episodes in the last five
years. His endocrinologist certifies that Mr. Gritten understands
diabetes management and monitoring, has stable control of his diabetes
using insulin, and is able to drive a CMV safely. Mr. Gritten meets the
requirements of the vision standard at 49 CFR 391.41(b)(10). His
optometrist examined him in 2017 and certified that he does not have
diabetic retinopathy. He holds an operator's license from Indiana.

Bradley S. Hanson

    Mr. Hanson, 35, has had ITDM since 2017. His endocrinologist
examined him in 2017 and certified that he has had no severe
hypoglycemic reactions resulting in loss of consciousness, requiring
the assistance of another person, or resulting in impaired cognitive
function that occurred without warning in the past 12 months and no
recurrent (two or more) severe hypoglycemic episodes in the last five
years. His endocrinologist certifies that Mr. Hanson understands
diabetes management and monitoring, has stable control of his diabetes
using insulin, and is able to drive a CMV safely. Mr. Hanson meets the
requirements of the vision standard at 49 CFR 391.41(b)(10). His
optometrist examined him in 2017 and certified that he does not have
diabetic retinopathy. He holds a Class A CDL from Minnesota.

Paul F. Herburger

    Mr. Herburger, 55, has had ITDM since 1992. His endocrinologist
examined him in 2017 and certified that he has had no severe
hypoglycemic reactions resulting in loss of consciousness, requiring
the assistance of another person, or resulting in impaired cognitive
function that occurred without warning in the past 12

months and no recurrent (two or more) severe hypoglycemic episodes in
the last five years. His endocrinologist certifies that Mr. Herburger
understands diabetes management and monitoring, has stable control of
his diabetes using insulin, and is able to drive a CMV safely. Mr.
Herburger meets the requirements of the vision standard at 49 CFR
391.41(b)(10). His optometrist examined him in 2017 and certified that
he does not have diabetic retinopathy. He holds a Class B CDL from
Iowa.

Robert H. Hopper

    Mr. Hopper, 71, has had ITDM since 2013. His endocrinologist
examined him in 2017 and certified that he has had no severe
hypoglycemic reactions resulting in loss of consciousness, requiring
the assistance of another person, or resulting in impaired cognitive
function that occurred without warning in the past 12 months and no
recurrent (two or more) severe hypoglycemic episodes in the last five
years. His endocrinologist certifies that Mr. Hopper understands
diabetes management and monitoring, has stable control of his diabetes
using insulin, and is able to drive a CMV safely. Mr. Hopper meets the
requirements of the vision standard at 49 CFR 391.41(b)(10). His
optometrist examined him in 2017 and certified that he does not have
diabetic retinopathy. He holds a Class A CDL from Missouri.

Rhonda V. Howe

    Ms. Howe, 46, has had ITDM since 2013. Her endocrinologist examined
her in 2017 and certified that she has had no severe hypoglycemic
reactions resulting in loss of consciousness, requiring the assistance
of another person, or resulting in impaired cognitive function that
occurred without warning in the past 12 months and no recurrent (two or
more) severe hypoglycemic episodes in the last five years. Her
endocrinologist certifies that Ms. Howe understands diabetes management
and monitoring has stable control of her diabetes using insulin, and is
able to drive a CMV safely. Ms. Howe meets the requirements of the
vision standard at 49 CFR 391.41(b)(10). Her optometrist examined her
in 2017 and certified that she does not have diabetic retinopathy. She
holds a Class B CDL from Pennsylvania.

Melvin L. Hutcheson

    Mr. Hutcheson, 64, has had ITDM since 2013. His endocrinologist
examined him in 2017 and certified that he has had no severe
hypoglycemic reactions resulting in loss of consciousness, requiring
the assistance of another person, or resulting in impaired cognitive
function that occurred without warning in the past 12 months and no
recurrent (two or more) severe hypoglycemic episodes in the last five
years. His endocrinologist certifies that Mr. Hutcheson understands
diabetes management and monitoring, has stable control of his diabetes
using insulin, and is able to drive a CMV safely. Mr. Hutcheson meets
the requirements of the vision standard at 49 CFR 391.41(b)(10). His
optometrist examined him in 2017 and certified that he does not have
diabetic retinopathy. He holds a Class A CDL from Alabama.

Tyler W. Keel

    Mr. Keel, 30, has had ITDM since 2013. His endocrinologist examined
him in 2017 and certified that he has had no severe hypoglycemic
reactions resulting in loss of consciousness, requiring the assistance
of another person, or resulting in impaired cognitive function that
occurred without warning in the past 12 months and no recurrent (two or
more) severe hypoglycemic episodes in the last five years. His
endocrinologist certifies that Mr. Keel understands diabetes management
and monitoring, has stable control of his diabetes using insulin, and
is able to drive a CMV safely. Mr. Keel meets the requirements of the
vision standard at 49 CFR 391.41(b)(10). His ophthalmologist examined
him in 2017 and certified that he does not have diabetic retinopathy.
He holds an operator's license from Texas.

Wyatt E.S. Kitchens

    Mr. Kitchens, 27, has had ITDM since 1992. His endocrinologist
examined him in 2017 and certified that he has had no severe
hypoglycemic reactions resulting in loss of consciousness, requiring
the assistance of another person, or resulting in impaired cognitive
function that occurred without warning in the past 12 months and no
recurrent (two or more) severe hypoglycemic episodes in the last five
years. His endocrinologist certifies that Mr. Kitchens understands
diabetes management and monitoring, has stable control of his diabetes
using insulin, and is able to drive a CMV safely. Mr. Kitchens meets
the requirements of the vision standard at 49 CFR 391.41(b)(10). His
ophthalmologist examined him in 2017 and certified that he does not
have diabetic retinopathy. He holds an operator's license from Georgia.

Gerald A. Korkow

    Mr. Korkow, 71, has had ITDM since 2014. His endocrinologist
examined him in 2017 and certified that he has had no severe
hypoglycemic reactions resulting in loss of consciousness, requiring
the assistance of another person, or resulting in impaired cognitive
function that occurred without warning in the past 12 months and no
recurrent (two or more) severe hypoglycemic episodes in the last five
years. His endocrinologist certifies that Mr. Korkow understands
diabetes management and monitoring, has stable control of his diabetes
using insulin, and is able to drive a CMV safely. Mr. Korkow meets the
requirements of the vision standard at 49 CFR 391.41(b)(10). His
ophthalmologist examined him in 2017 and certified that he does not
have diabetic retinopathy. He holds an operator's license from South
Dakota.

Richard B. Maurer

    Mr. Maurer, 69, has had ITDM since 2012. His endocrinologist
examined him in 2017 and certified that he has had no severe
hypoglycemic reactions resulting in loss of consciousness, requiring
the assistance of another person, or resulting in impaired cognitive
function that occurred without warning in the past 12 months and no
recurrent (two or more) severe hypoglycemic episodes in the last five
years. His endocrinologist certifies that Mr. Maurer understands
diabetes management and monitoring, has stable control of his diabetes
using insulin, and is able to drive a CMV safely. Mr. Maurer meets the
requirements of the vision standard at 49 CFR 391.41(b)(10). His
optometrist examined him in 2017 and certified that he does not have
diabetic retinopathy. He holds an operator's license from Pennsylvania.

James M. McDonald

    Mr. McDonald, 37, has had ITDM since 2017. His endocrinologist
examined him in 2017 and certified that he has had no severe
hypoglycemic reactions resulting in loss of consciousness, requiring
the assistance of another person, or resulting in impaired cognitive
function that occurred without warning in the past 12 months and no
recurrent (two or more) severe hypoglycemic episodes in the last five
years. His endocrinologist certifies that Mr. McDonald understands
diabetes management and monitoring, has stable control of his diabetes
using insulin, and is able to drive a CMV safely. Mr. McDonald meets
the requirements of the vision standard at 49 CFR 391.41(b)(10). His
ophthalmologist examined him in 2017 and certified that he does not
have diabetic retinopathy. He holds a Class A CDL from Iowa.

Mutasim Y.S. Mohamed

    Mr. Mohamed, 24, has had ITDM since 2016. His endocrinologist
examined him in 2017 and certified that he has had no severe
hypoglycemic reactions resulting in loss of consciousness, requiring
the assistance of another person, or resulting in impaired cognitive
function that occurred without warning in the past 12 months and no
recurrent (two or more) severe hypoglycemic episodes in the last five
years. His endocrinologist certifies that Mr. Mohamed understands
diabetes management and monitoring, has stable control of his diabetes
using insulin, and is able to drive a CMV safely. Mr. Mohamed meets the
requirements of the vision standard at 49 CFR 391.41(b)(10). His
optometrist examined him in 2017 and certified that he does not have
diabetic retinopathy. He holds an operator's license from Minnesota.

Paul S. Montell

    Mr. Montell, 42, has had ITDM since 1988. His endocrinologist
examined him in 2017 and certified that he has had no severe
hypoglycemic reactions resulting in loss of consciousness, requiring
the assistance of another person, or resulting in impaired cognitive
function that occurred without warning in the past 12 months and no
recurrent (two or more) severe hypoglycemic episodes in the last five
years. His endocrinologist certifies that Mr. Montell understands
diabetes management and monitoring, has stable control of his diabetes
using insulin, and is able to drive a CMV safely. Mr. Montell meets the
requirements of the vision standard at 49 CFR 391.41(b)(10). His
ophthalmologist examined him in 2017 and certified that he has stable
nonproliferative diabetic retinopathy. He holds an operator's license
from Pennsylvania.

James R. Pemberton

    Mr. Pemberton, 57, has had ITDM since 2015. His endocrinologist
examined him in 2017 and certified that he has had no severe
hypoglycemic reactions resulting in loss of consciousness, requiring
the assistance of another person, or resulting in impaired cognitive
function that occurred without warning in the past 12 months and no
recurrent (two or more) severe hypoglycemic episodes in the last five
years. His endocrinologist certifies that Mr. Pemberton understands
diabetes management and monitoring, has stable control of his diabetes
using insulin, and is able to drive a CMV safely. Mr. Pemberton meets
the requirements of the vision standard at 49 CFR 391.41(b)(10). His
optometrist examined him in 2017 and certified that he does not have
diabetic retinopathy. He holds a Class A CDL from New Jersey.

Charles E. Perdue, Jr.

    Mr. Perdue, 53, has had ITDM since 2017. His endocrinologist
examined him in 2017 and certified that he has had no severe
hypoglycemic reactions resulting in loss of consciousness, requiring
the assistance of another person, or resulting in impaired cognitive
function that occurred without warning in the past 12 months and no
recurrent (two or more) severe hypoglycemic episodes in the last five
years. His endocrinologist certifies that Mr. Perdue understands
diabetes management and monitoring, has stable control of his diabetes
using insulin, and is able to drive a CMV safely. Mr. Perdue meets the
requirements of the vision standard at 49 CFR 391.41(b)(10). His
optometrist examined him in 2017 and certified that he does not have
diabetic retinopathy. He holds a Class A CDL from Ohio.

Christopher L. Recla

    Mr. Recla, 46, has had ITDM since 2017. His endocrinologist
examined him in 2017 and certified that he has had no severe
hypoglycemic reactions resulting in loss of consciousness, requiring
the assistance of another person, or resulting in impaired cognitive
function that occurred without warning in the past 12 months and no
recurrent (two or more) severe hypoglycemic episodes in the last five
years. His endocrinologist certifies that Mr. Recla understands
diabetes management and monitoring, has stable control of his diabetes
using insulin, and is able to drive a CMV safely. Mr. Recla meets the
requirements of the vision standard at 49 CFR 391.41(b)(10). His
optometrist examined him in 2017 and certified that he does not have
diabetic retinopathy. He holds a Class A CDL from Wisconsin.

Jon C. Reeves

    Mr. Reeves, 47, has had ITDM since 2017. His endocrinologist
examined him in 2017 and certified that he has had no severe
hypoglycemic reactions resulting in loss of consciousness, requiring
the assistance of another person, or resulting in impaired cognitive
function that occurred without warning in the past 12 months and no
recurrent (two or more) severe hypoglycemic episodes in the last five
years. His endocrinologist certifies that Mr. Reeves understands
diabetes management and monitoring, has stable control of his diabetes
using insulin, and is able to drive a CMV safely. Mr. Reeves meets the
requirements of the vision standard at 49 CFR 391.41(b)(10). His
optometrist examined him in 2017 and certified that he does not have
diabetic retinopathy. He holds a Class A CDL from Oregon.

Hermes L. Rios

    Mr. Rios, 49, has had ITDM since 2017. His endocrinologist examined
him in 2017 and certified that he has had no severe hypoglycemic
reactions resulting in loss of consciousness, requiring the assistance
of another person, or resulting in impaired cognitive function that
occurred without warning in the past 12 months and no recurrent (two or
more) severe hypoglycemic episodes in the last five years. His
endocrinologist certifies that Mr. Rios understands diabetes management
and monitoring, has stable control of his diabetes using insulin, and
is able to drive a CMV safely. Mr. Rios meets the requirements of the
vision standard at 49 CFR 391.41(b)(10). His optometrist examined him
in 2017 and certified that he does not have diabetic retinopathy. He
holds a Class A CDL from Maryland.

Abimael Rodriguez

    Mr. Rodriguez, 63, has had ITDM since 2013. His endocrinologist
examined him in 2017 and certified that he has had no severe
hypoglycemic reactions resulting in loss of consciousness, requiring
the assistance of another person, or resulting in impaired cognitive
function that occurred without warning in the past 12 months and no
recurrent (two or more) severe hypoglycemic episodes in the last five
years. His endocrinologist certifies that Mr. Rodriguez understands
diabetes management and monitoring, has stable control of his diabetes
using insulin, and is able to drive a CMV safely. Mr. Rodriguez meets
the requirements of the vision standard at 49 CFR 391.41(b)(10). His
ophthalmologist examined him in 2017 and certified that he does not
have diabetic retinopathy. He holds an operator's license from
California.

Dustin A. Rudolfi

    Mr. Rudolfi, 32, has had ITDM since 1992. His endocrinologist
examined him in 2017 and certified that he has had no severe
hypoglycemic reactions resulting in loss of consciousness, requiring
the assistance of another person, or resulting in impaired cognitive
function that occurred without warning in the past 12 months and no
recurrent (two or more) severe hypoglycemic episodes in the last five
years. His endocrinologist certifies that Mr. Rudolfi understands
diabetes management and monitoring,

has stable control of his diabetes using insulin, and is able to drive
a CMV safely. Mr. Rudolfi meets the requirements of the vision standard
at 49 CFR 391.41(b)(10). His optometrist examined him in 2017 and
certified that he does not have diabetic retinopathy. He holds an
operator's license from Pennsylvania.

Jose A. Sanchez

    Mr. Sanchez, 47, has had ITDM since 2014. His endocrinologist
examined him in 2017 and certified that he has had no severe
hypoglycemic reactions resulting in loss of consciousness, requiring
the assistance of another person, or resulting in impaired cognitive
function that occurred without warning in the past 12 months and no
recurrent (two or more) severe hypoglycemic episodes in the last five
years. His endocrinologist certifies that
    Mr. Sanchez understands diabetes management and monitoring, has
stable control of his diabetes using insulin, and is able to drive a
CMV safely. Mr. Sanchez meets the requirements of the vision standard
at 49 CFR 391.41(b)(10). His optometrist examined him in 2017 and
certified that he does not have diabetic retinopathy. He holds an
operator's license from Colorado.

James A. Schmidt

    Mr. Schmidt, 56, has had ITDM since 2016. His endocrinologist
examined him in 2017 and certified that he has had no severe
hypoglycemic reactions resulting in loss of consciousness, requiring
the assistance of another person, or resulting in impaired cognitive
function that occurred without warning in the past 12 months and no
recurrent (two or more) severe hypoglycemic episodes in the last five
years. His endocrinologist certifies that Mr. Schmidt understands
diabetes management and monitoring, has stable control of his diabetes
using insulin, and is able to drive a CMV safely. Mr. Schmidt meets the
requirements of the vision standard at 49 CFR 391.41(b)(10). His
optometrist examined him in 2017 and certified that he does not have
diabetic retinopathy. He holds a Class A CDL from Missouri.

Jacob T. Sigmon

    Mr. Sigmon, 29, has had ITDM since 1990. His endocrinologist
examined him in 2017 and certified that he has had no severe
hypoglycemic reactions resulting in loss of consciousness, requiring
the assistance of another person, or resulting in impaired cognitive
function that occurred without warning in the past 12 months and no
recurrent (two or more) severe hypoglycemic episodes in the last five
years. His endocrinologist certifies that Mr. Sigmon understands
diabetes management and monitoring, has stable control of his diabetes
using insulin, and is able to drive a CMV safely. Mr. Sigmon meets the
requirements of the vision standard at 49 CFR 391.41(b)(10). His
optometrist examined him in 2017 and certified that he does not have
diabetic retinopathy. He holds an operator's license from Illinois.

David C. Stouffer

    Mr. Stouffer, 63, has had ITDM since 2014. His endocrinologist
examined him in 2017 and certified that he has had no severe
hypoglycemic reactions resulting in loss of consciousness, requiring
the assistance of another person, or resulting in impaired cognitive
function that occurred without warning in the past 12 months and no
recurrent (two or more) severe hypoglycemic episodes in the last five
years. His endocrinologist certifies that Mr. Stouffer understands
diabetes management and monitoring, has stable control of his diabetes
using insulin, and is able to drive a CMV safely. Mr. Stouffer meets
the requirements of the vision standard at 49 CFR 391.41(b)(10). His
ophthalmologist examined him in 2017 and certified that he has stable
nonproliferative diabetic retinopathy. He holds an operator's license
from Pennsylvania.

Jacob T. Streifel

    Mr. Streifel, 21, has had ITDM since 2010. His endocrinologist
examined him in 2017 and certified that he has had no severe
hypoglycemic reactions resulting in loss of consciousness, requiring
the assistance of another person, or resulting in impaired cognitive
function that occurred without warning in the past 12 months and no
recurrent (two or more) severe hypoglycemic episodes in the last five
years. His endocrinologist certifies that Mr. Streifel understands
diabetes management and monitoring, has stable control of his diabetes
using insulin, and is able to drive a CMV safely. Mr. Streifel meets
the requirements of the vision standard at 49 CFR 391.41(b)(10). His
optometrist examined him in 2017 and certified that he does not have
diabetic retinopathy. He holds an operator's license from Minnesota.

Jason M. Townsend

    Mr. Townsend, 37, has had ITDM since 1988. His endocrinologist
examined him in 2016 and certified that he has had no severe
hypoglycemic reactions resulting in loss of consciousness, requiring
the assistance of another person, or resulting in impaired cognitive
function that occurred without warning in the past 12 months and no
recurrent (two or more) severe hypoglycemic episodes in the last five
years. His endocrinologist certifies that Mr. Townsend understands
diabetes management and monitoring, has stable control of his diabetes
using insulin, and is able to drive a CMV safely. Mr. Townsend meets
the requirements of the vision standard at 49 CFR 391.41(b)(10). His
ophthalmologist examined him in 2017 and certified that he has stable
nonproliferative diabetic retinopathy. He holds an operator's license
from Ohio.

Johann J. Trana

    Mr. Trana, 46, has had ITDM since 2017. His endocrinologist
examined him in 2017 and certified that he has had no severe
hypoglycemic reactions resulting in loss of consciousness, requiring
the assistance of another person, or resulting in impaired cognitive
function that occurred without warning in the past 12 months and no
recurrent (two or more) severe hypoglycemic episodes in the last five
years. His endocrinologist certifies that Mr. Trana understands
diabetes management and monitoring, has stable control of his diabetes
using insulin, and is able to drive a CMV safely. Mr. Trana meets the
requirements of the vision standard at 49 CFR 391.41(b)(10). His
optometrist examined him in 2017 and certified that he does not have
diabetic retinopathy. He holds a Class A CDL from North Dakota.

Jacob C. Villa

    Mr. Villa, 34, has had ITDM since 2017. His endocrinologist
examined him in 2017 and certified that he has had no severe
hypoglycemic reactions resulting in loss of consciousness, requiring
the assistance of another person, or resulting in impaired cognitive
function that occurred without warning in the past 12 months and no
recurrent (two or more) severe hypoglycemic episodes in the last five
years. His endocrinologist certifies that Mr. Villa understands
diabetes management and monitoring, has stable control of his diabetes
using insulin, and is able to drive a CMV safely. Mr. Villa meets the
requirements of the vision standard at 49 CFR 391.41(b)(10). His
ophthalmologist examined him in 2017 and certified that he has stable
nonproliferative diabetic retinopathy. He holds a Class A CDL from
Oregon.

Raymond R. Wade

    Mr. Wade, 59, has had ITDM since 2003. His endocrinologist examined
him

in 2017 and certified that he has had no severe hypoglycemic reactions
resulting in loss of consciousness, requiring the assistance of another
person, or resulting in impaired cognitive function that occurred
without warning in the past 12 months and no recurrent (two or more)
severe hypoglycemic episodes in the last five years. His
endocrinologist certifies that Mr. Wade understands diabetes management
and monitoring, has stable control of his diabetes using insulin, and
is able to drive a CMV safely. Mr. Wade meets the requirements of the
vision standard at 49 CFR 391.41(b)(10). His ophthalmologist examined
him in 2017 and certified that he does not have diabetic retinopathy.
He holds an operator's license from Indiana.

Edwin M. Yereance

    Mr. Yereance, 59, has had ITDM since 2016. His endocrinologist
examined him in 2017 and certified that he has had no severe
hypoglycemic reactions resulting in loss of consciousness, requiring
the assistance of another person, or resulting in impaired cognitive
function that occurred without warning in the past 12 months and no
recurrent (two or more) severe hypoglycemic episodes in the last five
years. His endocrinologist certifies that Mr. Yereance understands
diabetes management and monitoring, has stable control of his diabetes
using insulin, and is able to drive a CMV safely. Mr. Yereance meets
the requirements of the vision standard at 49 CFR 391.41(b)(10). His
optometrist examined him in 2017 and certified that he does not have
diabetic retinopathy. He holds a Class A CDL from New Jersey.

III. Request for Comments

    In accordance with 49 U.S.C. 31136(e) and 31315, FMCSA requests
public comment from all interested persons on the exemption petitions
described in this notice. We will consider all comments received before
the close of business on the closing date indicated in the date's
section of the notice.

IV. Submitting Comments

    You may submit your comments and material online or by fax, mail,
or hand delivery, but please use only one of these means. FMCSA
recommends that you include your name and a mailing address, an email
address, or a phone number in the body of your document so that FMCSA
can contact you if there are questions regarding your submission.
    To submit your comment online, go to http://www.regulations.gov and
in the search box insert the docket number FMCSA-2017-0042 and click
the search button. When the new screen appears, click on the blue
``Comment Now!'' button on the right hand side of the page. On the new
page, enter information required including the specific section of this
document to which each comment applies, and provide a reason for each
suggestion or recommendation. If you submit your comments by mail or
hand delivery, submit them in an unbound format, no larger than 8\1/2\
by 11 inches, suitable for copying and electronic filing. If you submit
comments by mail and would like to know that they reached the facility,
please enclose a stamped, self-addressed postcard or envelope.
    We will consider all comments and materials received during the
comment period. FMCSA may issue a final determination at any time after
the close of the comment period.

V. Viewing Comments and Documents

    To view comments, as well as any documents mentioned in this
preamble, go to http://www.regulations.gov and in the search box insert
the docket number FMCSA-2017-0042 and click ``Search.'' Next, click
``Open Docket Folder'' and you will find all documents and comments
related to this notice.

    Issued on: August 15, 2017.
Larry W. Minor,
Associate Administrator for Policy.
[FR Doc. 2017-17937 Filed 8-23-17; 8:45 am]
 BILLING CODE 4910-EX-P


[Federal Register Volume 87, Number 70 (Tuesday, April 12, 2022)]
[Notices]
[Pages 21655-21657]
[FR Doc No: 2022-07808]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission

[Project No. 5261-023]

Green Mountain Power Corporation; Notice of Application Ready for
Environmental Analysis and Soliciting Comments, Recommendations, Terms
and Conditions, and Prescriptions

    Take notice that the following hydroelectric application has been
filed

with the Commission and is available for public inspection.
    a. Type of Application: Subsequent Minor License.
    b. Project No.: 5261-023.
    c. Date Filed: August 27, 2021.
    d. Applicant: Green Mountain Power Corporation.
    e. Name of Project: Newbury Hydroelectric Project.
    f. Location: On the Wells River, in the town of Newbury, Orange
County, Vermont. The project does not occupy any federal land.
    g. Filed Pursuant to: Federal Power Act 16 U.S.C. 791(a)-825(r).
    h. Applicant Contact: John Greenan, Green Mountain Power
Corporation, 2152 Post Road, Rutland, VT 05701; Phone at (802) 770-
2195, or email at [email protected].
    i. FERC Contact: Adam Peer,<PHONE_NUMBER> or [email protected].
    j. Deadline for filing comments, recommendations, terms and
conditions, and prescriptions: 60 days from the issuance date of this
notice; reply comments are due 105 days from the issuance date of this
notice.
    The Commission strongly encourages electronic filing. Please file
comments, recommendations, terms and conditions, and prescriptions
using the Commission's eFiling system at https://ferconline.ferc.gov/FERCOnline.aspx. Commenters can submit brief comments up to 6,000
characters, without prior registration, using the eComment system at
https://ferconline.ferc.gov/QuickComment.aspx. You must include your
name and contact information at the end of your comments. For
assistance, please contact FERC Online Support at
[email protected],<PHONE_NUMBER> (toll free), or (202) 502-
8659 (TTY). In lieu of electronic filing, you may submit a paper copy.
Submissions sent via the U.S. Postal Service must be addressed to:
Kimberly D. Bose, Secretary, Federal Energy Regulatory Commission, 888
First Street NE, Room 1A, Washington, DC 20426. Submissions sent via
any other carrier must be addressed to: Kimberly D. Bose, Secretary,
Federal Energy Regulatory Commission, 12225 Wilkins Avenue, Rockville,
Maryland 20852. The first page of any filing should include docket
number P-5261-023.
    The Commission's Rules of Practice require all intervenors filing
documents with the Commission to serve a copy of that document on each
person on the official service list for the project. Further, if an
intervenor files comments or documents with the Commission relating to
the merits of an issue that may affect the responsibilities of a
particular resource agency, they must also serve a copy of the document
on that resource agency.
    k. This application has been accepted and is ready for
environmental analysis at this time.
    The Council on Environmental Quality (CEQ) issued a final rule on
July 15, 2020, revising the regulations under 40 CFR parts 1500-1518
that federal agencies use to implement the National Environmental
Policy Act (NEPA) (see Update to the Regulations Implementing the
Procedural Provisions of the National Environmental Policy Act, 85 FR
43,304). The Final Rule became effective on and applies to any NEPA
process begun after September 14, 2020. Commission staff intends to
conduct its NEPA review in accordance with CEQ's new regulations.
    l. The Newbury Project consists of: (1) An 11.4-acre impoundment at
a normal water surface elevation of 463.9 feet mean sea level; (2) a 26
foot-high by 90-foot-long concrete gravity dam that includes a 73.3-
foot-long spillway topped with 5-foot-high pneumatic crest gates; (3) a
seasonally installed, 8-foot-long by 4-foot-wide steel sluice box on
the south side of the spillway to provide downstream fish passage; (4)
an 11.2-foot-wide, 9-foot-long intake structure that includes trash
racks with 1-inch clear bar spacing, connected to a 5-foot-diameter,
435-foot-long underground steel penstock; (5) a powerhouse containing a
single 315-kilowatt turbine-generator unit (unit 1); (6) a second 50-
kilowatt turbine-generator unit (unit 2) located outside of the
powerhouse approximately 75-feet downstream of the dam along the
bypassed reach; (7) a 125-foot-long tailrace that receives discharges
from unit 1; (8) a 130-foot-long underground generator lead from unit 1
and a 410-foot-long generator lead from unit 2 that connect to three
above-ground pole mounted 167 kilovolt-ampere step-up transformers; (9)
a 3-phase, 7-foot-long transmission line; and (10) appurtenant
facilities. The project creates a 590-foot-long bypassed reach of the
Wells River.
    The current license requires Green Mountain Power Corporation to:
(1) Operate the project in run-of-river mode; (2) release a continuous
bypassed reach minimum flow of 50 cubic feet per second (cfs) from
April 15 to June 10 and 5 cfs during the remainder of the year; (3)
release a year-round, continuous aesthetic flow of 5 cfs over the dam;
and (4) operate the fish passage chute from April 1 to June 1 and
September 1 to November 15 with flows of 20 cfs and 10 cfs,
respectively. The average annual generation of the project is
approximately 882 megawatt-hours.
    Green Mountain Power Corporation proposes to: (1) Continue
operating the project in run-of-river mode; (2) release a new bypassed
reach minimum flow of 35 cfs from May 15 to October 15 and 30 cfs from
October 16 to May 14; (3) release a new aesthetic flow of 10 cfs over
the dam from May 15 to October 15 during daytime hours and no aesthetic
flow the remainder of the year; (4) operate the fish passage chute from
April 1 to June 1 and September 1 to November 15 with new flows of 10
cfs during both operating periods; (5) construct a hand-carry access
area for recreational boaters; and (6) consult with the resource
agencies prior to conducting maintenance and repairs that have the
potential to affect water quality.
    m. A copy of the application can be viewed on the Commission's
website at http://www.ferc.gov using the ``eLibrary'' link. Enter the
docket number excluding the last three digits in the docket number
field to access the document. For assistance, contact FERC Online
Support.
    All filings must: (1) Bear in all capital letters the title
``COMMENTS,'' ``REPLY COMMENTS,'' ``RECOMMENDATIONS,'' ``TERMS AND
CONDITIONS,'' or ``PRESCRIPTIONS;'' (2) set forth in the heading the
name of the applicant and the project number of the application to
which the filing responds; (3) furnish the name, address, and telephone
number of the person submitting the filing; and (4) otherwise comply
with the requirements of 18 CFR 385.2001 through 385.2005. All
comments, recommendations, terms and conditions, or prescriptions must
set forth their evidentiary basis and otherwise comply with the
requirements of 18 CFR 4.34(b). Agencies may obtain copies of the
application directly from the applicant. Each filing must be
accompanied by proof of service on all persons listed on the service
list prepared by the Commission in this proceeding, in accordance with
18 CFR 4.34(b) and 385.2010.
    You may also register online at https://www.ferc.gov/ferc-online/overview to be notified via email of new filings and issuances related
to this or other pending projects. For assistance, contact FERC Online
Support.
    n. The applicant must file no later than 60 days following the date
of issuance of this notice either: (1) Evidence of the date on which
the certifying agency received the certification request; (2) a copy of
the water quality certification; or (3)

evidence of waiver of water quality certification.
    o. Procedural Schedule: The application will be processed according
to the following schedule. Revisions to the schedule will be made as
appropriate.

------------------------------------------------------------------------
                Milestone                           Target date
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Deadline for filing comments,             June 2022.
 recommendations, preliminary terms and
 conditions, and preliminary fishway
 prescriptions.
Deadline for filing reply comments......  July 2022.
------------------------------------------------------------------------

    p. Final amendments to the application must be filed with the
Commission no later than 30 days from the issuance date of this notice.

    Dated: April 6, 2022.
Kimberly D. Bose,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2022-07808 Filed 4-11-22; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6717-01-P


[Federal Register: March 31, 2008 (Volume 73, Number 62)]
[Notices]
[Page 16851-16852]
[DOCID:fr31mr08-62]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission

[Project No. 2479-010]

Pacific Gas and Electric Company; Notice of Intent To File
License Application, Filing of Pre-Application Document, Commencement
of Licensing Proceeding, Scoping, Solicitation of Comments on the Pad
and Scoping Document, and Identification of Issues and Associated Study
Requests

March 25, 2008.
    a. Type of Filing: Notice of Intent to File License Application for
a New License and Commencing Licensing Proceeding.
    b. Project No.: 2479-010.
    c. Dated Filed: February 21, 2008.
    d. Submitted by: Pacific Gas and Electric Company (PG&E).
    e. Name of Project: French Meadows Transmission Line Project.
    f. Location: The French Meadows Transmission Line Project (Project)
is located in Placer County, California and is entirely within the
boundaries of the El Dorado and Tahoe National Forests. The Project
includes three sections: (1) The French Meadows Transmission Line, a
60-kilovolt (kV) transmission line extending from Placer County Water
Agency's (PCWA) French Meadows power plant to PCWA's Middle Fork power
plant; (2) the Oxbow Tap, a 60-kV tap to PCWA's Oxbow power plant, and
(3) the Ralston Tap, a 230-kV tap entirely contained within the
switchyard of PCWA's Ralston power plant. Each of PCWA's facilities are
associated with their Middle Fork Hydroelectric Project, FERC No. 2079,
and are not included as part of the Project. The combined length of the
Project is 13.37 miles with a right-of-way 40 feet in width.
    g. Filed Pursuant to: 18 CFR Part 5 of the Commission's
Regulations.
    h. Applicant Contact: Mr. Forrest Sullivan, Senior Project Manager,
Pacific Gas and Electric Company, 5555 Florin Perkins Road, Room 100,
Sacramento, CA 95826,<PHONE_NUMBER>.
    i.FERC Contact: Carolyn Templeton at<PHONE_NUMBER> or e-mail
<EMAIL_ADDRESS>    j. We are asking Federal, State, local, and tribal agencies with
jurisdiction and/or special expertise with respect to environmental
issues to cooperate with us in the preparation of the environmental
document. Agencies who would like to request cooperating status should
follow the instructions for filing comments described in paragraph (o)
below. Cooperating agencies should note the Commission's policy that
agencies that cooperate in the preparation of the environmental
document cannot also intervene. See, 94 FERC ] 61,076 (2001).
    k. With this notice, we are initiating informal consultation with:
(a) The U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service and/or NOAA Fisheries under
section 7 of the Endangered Species Act and the joint agency
regulations thereunder at 50 CFR, Part 402 and (b) the California State
Historic Preservation Officer, as required by section 106, National
Historical Preservation Act, and the implementing regulations of the
Advisory Council on Historic Preservation at 36 CFR 800.2.
    l. With this notice, we are designating PG&E as the Commission's
non-federal representative for carrying out informal consultation,
pursuant to section 7 of the Endangered Species Act and section 106 of
the National Historic Preservation Act.
    m. PG&E filed a Pre-Application Document (PAD); including a
proposed process plan and schedule with the Commission, pursuant to 18
CFR 5.6 of the Commission's regulations.
    n. A copy of the PAD is available for review at the Commission in
the Public Reference Room or may be viewed on the Commission's Web site
(http://www.ferc.gov), using the ``eLibrary'' link. Enter the docket
number, excluding the last three digits in the docket number field to
access the document. For assistance, contact FERC Online Support at
<EMAIL_ADDRESS>or toll free at 1-866-208-3676, of for TTY,
(202) 502-8659. A copy is also available for inspection and
reproduction at the address in paragraph (h).
    Register online at http://ferc.gov/esubscribenow.htm to be notified
via e-mail of new filing and issuances related to this or other pending
projects. For assistance, contact FERC Online Support.
    o. With this notice, we are soliciting comments on the PAD and
Scoping Document 1 (SD1), as well as study requests. All comments on
the PAD and SD1, and study requests should be sent to the address above
in paragraph (h). In addition, all comments on the PAD and SD1, study
requests, requests for cooperating agency status, and all
communications to and from Commission staff related to the merits of
the potential application (an original and eight copies) must be filed
with the Commission at the following address: Kimberly D. Bose,
Secretary, Federal Energy Regulatory Commission, 888 First Street, NE.,
Washington, DC 20426.

All filings with the Commission must include on the first page, the
project name (French Meadows Transmission Line Project) and number (P-
2479-010), and bear the heading ``Comments on Pre-Application
Document,'' ``Study Requests,'' ``Comments on Scoping Document 1,''
``Request for Cooperating Agency Status,'' or ``Communications to and
from Commission Staff.'' Any individual or entity interested in
submitting study requests, commenting on the PAD or SD1, and any agency
requesting cooperating status must do so by April 11, 2008.
    Comments on the PAD and SD1, study requests, requests for
cooperating agency status, and other permissible forms of
communications with the Commission may be filed electronically via the
Internet in lieu of paper. The Commission strongly encourages
electronic filings. See 18 CFR 385.2001(a)(1)(iii) and the instructions
on the Commission's Web site (http://www.ferc.gov) under the ``e-
filing'' link.
    p. Our intent is to prepare an Environmental Impact Statement for
which the below meetings satisfied the NEPA scoping requirements.

Scoping Meetings

    Because of the interconnection between the French Meadows
Transmission Line Project and PCWA's Middle Fork American Project, the
scoping meetings for these projects were held concurrently on March 4,
2008, at the Auburn Recreation District-Canyon View Community Center.
Commission staff held two scoping meetings; one daytime meeting focused
on resource agency, Indian tribes, and non-governmental organization
concerns, and one evening meeting focused primarily on receiving input
from the public. We invited all interested individuals, organizations,
and agencies to attend one or both of the meetings, and to assist staff
in identifying particular study needs, as well as the scope of
environmental issues to be addressed in the environmental document. The
meetings were recorded by a stenographer and became part of the formal
record of the Commission proceeding on the projects. Transcripts from
these meetings may be viewed on the Web at http://www.ferc.gov, using
the ``eLibrary'' link. Follow the directions for accessing information
in paragraph (n).
    SD1, which outlines the subject areas to be addressed in the
environmental document, was mailed to the individuals and entities on
the Commission's mailing list. Copies of SD1 were available at the
scoping meetings, and may be viewed on the Web at http://www.ferc.gov,
using the ``eLibrary'' link. Follow the directions for accessing
information in paragraph (n). Based on all oral and written comments, a
Scoping Document 2 (SD2) may be issued. SD2 may include a revised
process plan and schedule, as well as a list of issues, identified
through the scoping process.

Site Visit

    Typically, a site visit is held together with the scoping meeting.
However, because most of the project sites were not be accessible in
early March, the licensees (PCWA and PG&E) and Commission staff will
visit the project sites on Wednesday, June 25, 2008, starting at 8 a.m.
All participants should meet at Auburn Recreation District Canyon View
Community Center, located at 471 Maidu Drive, Auburn, California. PCWA
and PG&E will provide transportation for participants. Anyone
interested in attending the site visit should contact Mr. Forrest
Sullivan of PG&E at<PHONE_NUMBER> by June 11, 2008. Depending on
interest, a second day (Thursday, June 26, 2008) of site visits may be
added to the schedule. Should this be the case, a notice will be issued
in June stating as such.

Kimberly D. Bose,
Secretary.
 [FR Doc. E8-6534 Filed 3-28-08; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 6717-01-P


[Federal Register Volume 77, Number 102 (Friday, May 25, 2012)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Pages 31178-31180]
[FR Doc No: 2012-12325]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION

Federal Aviation Administration

14 CFR Part 97

[Docket No. 30843; Amdt. No. 3479]

Standard Instrument Approach Procedures, and Takeoff Minimums and
Obstacle Departure Procedures; Miscellaneous Amendments

AGENCY: Federal Aviation Administration (FAA), DOT.

ACTION: Final rule.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: This rule establishes, amends, suspends, or revokes Standard
Instrument Approach Procedures (SIAPs) and associated Takeoff Minimums
and Obstacle Departure Procedures for operations at certain airports.
These regulatory actions are needed because of the adoption of new or
revised criteria, or because of changes occurring in the National
Airspace System, such as the commissioning of new navigational
facilities, adding new obstacles, or changing air traffic requirements.
These changes are designed to provide safe and efficient use of the
navigable airspace and to promote safe flight operations under
instrument flight rules at the affected airports.

DATES: This rule is effective May 25, 2012. The compliance date for
each SIAP, associated Takeoff Minimums, and ODP is specified in the
amendatory provisions.

    The incorporation by reference of certain publications listed in
the regulations is approved by the Director of the Federal Register as
of May 25, 2012.

ADDRESSES: Availability of matter incorporated by reference in the
amendment is as follows:
    For Examination--
    1. FAA Rules Docket, FAA Headquarters Building, 800 Independence
Avenue SW., Washington, DC 20591;
    2. The FAA Regional Office of the region in which the affected
airport is located;
    3. The National Flight Procedures Office, 6500 South MacArthur
Blvd., Oklahoma City, OK 73169; or
    4. The National Archives and Records Administration (NARA). For
information on the availability of this material at NARA, call 202-741-
6030, or go to: http://www.archives.gov/federal_register/code_of_federal_regulations/ibr_locations.html.
    Availability_All SIAPs are available online free of charge. Visit
nfdc.faa.gov to register. Additionally, individual SIAP and Takeoff
Minimums and ODP copies may be obtained from:
    1. FAA Public Inquiry Center (APA-200), FAA Headquarters Building,
800 Independence Avenue SW., Washington, DC 20591; or
    2. The FAA Regional Office of the region in which the affected
airport is located.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Richard A. Dunham III, Flight
Procedure Standards Branch (AFS-420) Flight Technologies and Programs
Division, Flight Standards Service, Federal Aviation Administration,
Mike Monroney Aeronautical Center, 6500 South MacArthur Blvd., Oklahoma
City, OK 73169 (Mail Address: P.O. Box 25082 Oklahoma City, OK 73125)
telephone:<PHONE_NUMBER>.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: This rule amends Title 14, Code of Federal
Regulations, Part 97 (14 CFR part 97) by amending the referenced SIAPs.
The complete regulatory description of each SIAP is listed on the
appropriate FAA Form 8260, as modified by the National Flight Data
Center (FDC)/Permanent Notice to Airmen (P-NOTAM), and is incorporated
by reference in the amendment under 5 U.S.C. 552(a), 1 CFR part 51, and
Sec.  97.20 of Title 14 of the Code of Federal Regulations.
    The large number of SIAPs, their complex nature, and the need for a
special format make their verbatim publication in the Federal Register
expensive and impractical. Further, airmen do not use the regulatory
text of the SIAPs, but refer to their graphic depiction on charts
printed by publishers of aeronautical materials. Thus, the advantages
of incorporation by reference are realized and publication of the
complete description of each SIAP contained in FAA form documents is
unnecessary. This amendment provides the affected CFR sections and
specifies the types of SIAP and the corresponding effective dates. This
amendment also identifies the airport and its location, the procedure
and the amendment number.

The Rule

    This amendment to 14 CFR part 97 is effective upon publication of
each separate SIAP as amended in the transmittal. For safety and
timeliness of change considerations, this amendment incorporates only
specific changes contained for each SIAP as modified by FDC/P-NOTAMs.
    The SIAPs, as modified by FDC P-NOTAM, and contained in this
amendment are based on the criteria contained in the U.S. Standard for
Terminal Instrument Procedures (TERPS). In developing these changes to
SIAPs, the TERPS criteria were applied only to specific conditions
existing at the affected airports. All SIAP amendments in this rule
have been previously issued by the FAA in a FDC NOTAM as an emergency
action of immediate flight safety relating directly to published
aeronautical charts. The circumstances which created the need for all
these SIAP amendments requires making them effective in less than 30
days.
    Because of the close and immediate relationship between these SIAPs
and safety in air commerce, I find that notice and public procedure
before adopting these SIAPs are impracticable and contrary to the
public interest and, where applicable, that good cause exists for
making these SIAPs effective in less than 30 days.

Conclusion

    The FAA has determined that this regulation only involves an
established body of technical regulations for which frequent and
routine amendments are necessary to keep them operationally current.
It, therefore--(1) Is not a ``significant regulatory action'' under
Executive Order 12866; (2) is not a ``significant rule'' under DOT
regulatory Policies and Procedures (44 FR 11034; February 26, 1979);
and (3) does not warrant preparation of a regulatory evaluation as the
anticipated impact is so minimal. For the same reason, the FAA
certifies that this amendment will not have a significant economic
impact on a substantial number of small entities under the criteria of
the Regulatory Flexibility Act.

List of Subjects in 14 CFR Part 97

    Air Traffic Control, Airports, Incorporation by reference, and
Navigation (Air).

    Issued in Washington, DC on May 11, 2012.
Ray Towles,
Deputy Director, Flight Standards Service.

Adoption of the Amendment

    Accordingly, pursuant to the authority delegated to me, Title 14,
Code of Federal regulations, Part 97, 14 CFR part 97, is amended by
amending Standard Instrument Approach Procedures, effective at 0901 UTC
on the dates specified, as follows:

PART 97--STANDARD INSTRUMENT APPROACH PROCEDURES

0
1. The authority citation for part 97 continues to read as follows:

    Authority: 49 U.S.C. 106(g), 40103, 40106, 40113, 40114, 40120,
44502, 44514, 44701, 44719, 44721-44722.

0
2. Part 97 is amended to read as follows:

Sec. Sec.  97.23, 97.25, 97.27, 97.29, 97.31, 97.33, 97.35  [AMENDED]

    By amending: Sec.  97.23 VOR, VOR/DME, VOR or TACAN, and VOR/DME or
TACAN; Sec.  97.25 LOC, LOC/DME, LDA, LDA/DME, SDF, SDF/DME; Sec.
97.27 NDB, NDB/DME; Sec.  97.29 ILS, ILS/DME, MLS, MLS/DME, MLS/RNAV;
Sec.  97.31 RADAR SIAPs; Sec.  97.33 RNAV SIAPs; and Sec.  97.35 COPTER
SIAPs, identified as follows:

* * * Effective Upon Publication

----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
    AIRAC date         State           City             Airport         FDC No.      FDC Date        Subject
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
28-Jun-12.........  FL          Miami............  Miami Intl.......       2/2277       5/8/12  ILS OR LOC RWY
                                                                                8R, Amdt 30B.
28-Jun-12.........  TX          Dallas...........  Dallas Love Field       2/3938       5/8/12  ILS OR LOC RWY
                                                                                31L, Amdt 21A.
28-Jun-12.........  OH          Columbus.........  Rickenbacker Intl       2/4597       5/8/12  ILS OR LOC RWY
                                                                                5R, Amdt 3.
28-Jun-12.........  GA          Jekyll Island....  Jekyll Island....       2/5532       5/8/12  VOR A, Amdt 10.
28-Jun-12.........  AL          Pell City........  St Clair County..       2/5579       5/8/12  RNAV (GPS) RWY
                                                                                3, Amdt 2A.
28-Jun-12.........  AL          Pell City........  St Clair County..       2/5581       5/8/12  RNAV (GPS) RWY
                                                                                21, Amdt 2.
28-Jun-12.........  IL          De Kalb..........  De Kalb Taylor          2/5711       5/8/12  ILS OR LOC RWY
                                                    Muni.                                        2, Orig-B.
28-Jun-12.........  IL          Chicago/West       Dupage...........       2/6836       5/8/12  RNAV (GPS) RWY
                                 Chicago.                                                        20R, Amdt 1.
28-Jun-12.........  IA          Des Moines.......  Des Moines Intl..       2/6965       5/8/12  ILS OR LOC RWY
                                                                                31, Amdt 23.
28-Jun-12.........  IA          Des Moines.......  Des Moines Intl..       2/6966       5/8/12  RNAV (GPS) RWY
                                                                                13, Amdt 1A.
28-Jun-12.........  IA          Des Moines.......  Des Moines Intl..       2/6967       5/8/12  ILS OR LOC RWY
                                                                                5, Orig-A.
28-Jun-12.........  IA          Des Moines.......  Des Moines Intl..       2/6968       5/8/12  RNAV (GPS) RWY
                                                                                5, Amdt 1.
28-Jun-12.........  IA          Des Moines.......  Des Moines Intl..       2/6970       5/8/12  RNAV (GPS) RWY
                                                                                31, Amdt 1A.
28-Jun-12.........  IA          Des Moines.......  Des Moines Intl..       2/6971       5/8/12  ILS OR LOC RWY
                                                                                13, Amdt 9.
28-Jun-12.........  AR          Monticello.......  Monticello Muni/        2/6972       5/8/12  VOR A, Amdt 6.
                                                    Ellis Field.
28-Jun-12.........  AR          Monticello.......  Monticello Muni/        2/6973       5/8/12  RNAV (GPS) RWY
                                                    Ellis Field.                                 3, Amdt 1.
28-Jun-12.........  AR          Monticello.......  Monticello Muni/        2/6974       5/8/12  RNAV (GPS) RWY
                                                    Ellis Field.                                 21, Orig.
28-Jun-12.........  OK          Oklahoma City....  Sundance Airpark.       2/6987       5/8/12  LOC RWY 17, Orig-
                                                                                D.
28-Jun-12.........  TX          Houston..........  Ellington Field..       2/7012       5/8/12  RNAV (GPS) RWY
                                                                                17R, Amdt 1.
28-Jun-12.........  TX          Snyder...........  Winston Field....       2/7605       5/8/12  NDB RWY 35, Amdt
                                                                                2A.
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

[FR Doc. 2012-12325 Filed 5-24-12; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910-13-P