[Federal Register Volume 81, Number 228 (Monday, November 28, 2016)]
[Proposed Rules]
[Pages 85455-85457]
[FR Doc No: 2016-28436]

=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY

40 CFR Part 52

[EPA-R03-OAR-2016-0454; FRL-9955-51-Region 3]

Approval and Promulgation of Air Quality Implementation Plans;
Maryland; New Regulations for Architectural and Industrial Maintenance
Coatings

AGENCY: Environmental Protection Agency (EPA).

ACTION: Proposed rule.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) is proposing to
approve a state implementation plan (SIP) revision submitted by the
State of Maryland. This revision pertains to a provision establishing
new volatile organic compound (VOC) content limits and standards for
architectural and industrial maintenance (AIM) coatings available for
sale and use in Maryland. This action is being taken under the Clean
Air Act (CAA).

DATES: Written comments must be received on or before December 28,
2016.

ADDRESSES: Submit your comments, identified by Docket ID No. EPA-R03-
OAR-2016-0454 at http://www.regulations.gov, or via email to
<EMAIL_ADDRESS>For comments submitted at Regulations.gov, follow
the online instructions for submitting comments. Once submitted,
comments cannot be edited or removed from Regulations.gov. For either
manner of submission, EPA may publish any comment received to its
public docket. Do not submit electronically any information you
consider to be confidential business information (CBI) or other
information whose disclosure is restricted by statute. Multimedia
submissions (audio, video, etc.) must be accompanied by a written
comment. The written comment is considered the official comment and
should include discussion of all points you wish to make. EPA will
generally not consider comments or comment contents located outside of
the primary submission (i.e. on the web, cloud, or other file sharing
system). For additional submission methods, please contact the person
identified in the FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT section. For the full
EPA public comment policy, information about CBI or multimedia
submissions, and general guidance on making effective comments, please
visit http://www2.epa.gov/dockets/commenting-epa-dockets.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Irene Shandruk,<PHONE_NUMBER>, or by
email at<EMAIL_ADDRESS>
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

I. Background

    In 2001, the Ozone Transport Commission (OTC), in collaboration
with the Ozone Transport Region (OTR) states, developed several
emission reduction measures, including a VOC model rule for AIM
coatings (known as the Phase I AIM model rule), which addressed VOC
reductions in the OTR. In 2004, consistent with the OTC Phase I AIM
model rule, Maryland adopted COMAR 26.11.33--Architectural Coatings,
which established VOC content limits, recordkeeping and labeling
requirements, and standard practices for use and application of
coatings used in architectural and industrial maintenance.
    The Phase I AIM model rule was replaced with an amended OTC model
rule in 2011 (known as the Phase II AIM model rule). The Phase II AIM
model rule was developed for states that needed additional VOC emission

reductions in order to meet the ozone national ambient air quality
standards (NAAQS). Consistent with the Phase II AIM model rule,
Maryland developed and adopted COMAR 26.11.39--Architectural and
Industrial Maintenance Coatings, which is an updated version of COMAR
26.11.33.

II. Summary of SIP Revision

    On June 27, 2016, the Maryland Department of the Environment (MDE)
submitted to EPA a SIP revision containing new AIM regulations .01
through .08 under COMAR 26.11.39--Architectural and Industrial
Maintenance Coatings. The new regulations apply to any person who
manufactures, blends, thins, supplies, sells, offers for sale,
repackages for sale, or applies architectural and industrial
maintenance coatings in Maryland. Maryland's new AIM regulations
establish more stringent VOC content limits (Table 1) and standards for
AIM coating categories than in COMAR 26.11.33, as well as establish
container labeling requirements, reporting requirements, and compliance
procedures. The requirements of COMAR 26.11.39 will supersede those of
COMAR 26.11.33. A more detailed explanation and analysis of COMAR
26.11.39 can be found in the Technical Support Document (TSD) for this
rulemaking under Docket ID No. EPA-R03-OAR-2016-0454.\1\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \1\ The TSD contains a comparison of VOC content limits in COMAR
26.11.39 and COMAR 26.11.33, demonstrating additional VOC emission
reduction potential from COMAR 26.11.39 for this source category.
The TSD also describes some AIM categories that were consolidated or
added in the new COMAR 26.11.39 compared to COMAR 26.11.33, which
EPA had previously approved for the Maryland SIP. However, none of
these adjustments removed any VOC content limits from the Maryland
regulation, which EPA had approved previously into the Maryland SIP.

Table 1--VOC Content Limits Under COMAR 26.11.39 for Various AIM Coating
                               Categories
------------------------------------------------------------------------
                                                      Maryland's new VOC
                                                        content limits
  Architectural and industrial maintenance coatings      (grams/liter)
                      category                            under COMAR
                                                           26.11.39
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Flat coatings.......................................                  50
Non-flat coatings...................................                 100
Non-flat--high gloss coatings.......................                 150
Specialty Coatings:
Aluminum roof coatings..............................                 450
Basement specialty coatings.........................                 400
Bituminous roof coatings............................                 270
Bituminous roof primers.............................                 350
Bond breakers.......................................                 350
Calcimine recoater..................................                 475
Concrete curing compounds...........................                 350
Concrete/masonry sealers............................                 100
Concrete surface retarders..........................                 780
Conjugated oil varnish..............................                 450
Conversion varnish..................................                 725
Driveway sealers....................................                  50
Dry fog coatings....................................                 150
Faux finishing coatings.............................                 350
Fire-resistive coatings.............................                 350
Floor coatings......................................                 100
Form-release coatings...............................                 250
Graphic arts coatings (Sign paints).................                 500
High-temperature coatings...........................                 420
Impacted immersion coatings.........................                 780
Industrial maintenance coatings.....................                 250
Low-solids coatings.................................                 120
Magnesite cement coatings...........................                 450
Mastic texture coatings.............................                 100
Metallic pigmented coatings.........................                 500
Multi-color coatings................................                 250
Nuclear coatings....................................                 450
Pre-treatment wash primers..........................                 420
Primers, sealers, and undercoaters..................                 100
Reactive penetrating sealers........................                 350
Reactive penetrating carbonate stone sealers........                 500
Recycled coatings...................................                 250
Roof coatings.......................................                 250
Rust preventative coatings..........................                 250
Shellacs:
Clear...............................................                 730
Opaque..............................................                 550
Specialty primers, sealers, and undercoaters........                 100
Stains..............................................                 250
Stone consolidant...................................                 450
Swimming pool coatings..............................                 340
Thermoplastic rubber coatings and mastic............                 550
Traffic marking coatings............................                 100
Tub and tile refinish coatings......................                 420
Waterproofing membranes.............................                 250
Wood coatings.......................................                 275

Wood preservatives..................................                 350
Zinc-rich primers...................................                 340
------------------------------------------------------------------------

III. Proposed Action

    EPA's review of this material indicates that Maryland's new
regulations for AIM coatings under COMAR 26.11.39 are based on the
OTC's Phase II AIM model rule and establish more stringent VOC content
limits and requirements for certain AIM coating categories compared to
COMAR 26.11.33. Therefore, these new regulations should lead to
additional VOC reductions from this category. Additionally, Maryland's
new AIM coating regulations are more stringent than the federal
standards found at 40 CFR 59, subpart D--National Volatile Organic
Compound Emission Standards for Architectural Coatings, which in 1998
established nationwide VOC content limits and other requirements for
manufacturers of architectural coatings. EPA expects more stringent VOC
content limits will reduce emissions of VOCs, a precursor to ozone
formation. Reduced VOC emissions and reduced ozone formation will
assist Maryland with attaining and maintaining the ozone NAAQS. EPA
proposes to add COMAR 26.11.39 to the Maryland SIP as a SIP
strengthening measure. Pursuant to section 110 of the CAA, EPA is
proposing to approve Maryland's new AIM coating provision, COMAR
26.11.39, which was submitted on June 27, 2016, as a revision to the
Maryland SIP. EPA is soliciting public comments on the issues discussed
in this document. These comments will be considered before taking final
action.

IV. Incorporation by Reference

    In this proposed rule, EPA is proposing to include in a final EPA
rule regulatory text that includes incorporation by reference. In
accordance with requirements of 1 CFR 51.5, EPA is proposing to
incorporate by reference Maryland's new regulations for AIM coatings
under COMAR 26.11.39. EPA has made, and will continue to make, these
materials generally available through http://www.regulations.gov and/or
at the EPA Region III Office (please contact the person identified in
the FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT section of this preamble for more
information).

V. Statutory and Executive Order Reviews

    Under the CAA, the Administrator is required to approve a SIP
submission that complies with the provisions of the CAA and applicable
Federal regulations. 42 U.S.C. 7410(k); 40 CFR 52.02(a). Thus, in
reviewing SIP submissions, EPA's role is to approve state choices,
provided that they meet the criteria of the CAA. Accordingly, this
action merely approves state law as meeting Federal requirements and
does not impose additional requirements beyond those imposed by state
law. For that reason, this proposed action:
     Is not a ``significant regulatory action'' subject to
review by the Office of Management and Budget under Executive Orders
12866 (58 FR 51735, October 4, 1993) and 13563 (76 FR 3821, January 21,
2011);
     does not impose an information collection burden under the
provisions of the Paperwork Reduction Act (44 U.S.C. 3501 et seq.);
     is certified as not having a significant economic impact
on a substantial number of small entities under the Regulatory
Flexibility Act (5 U.S.C. 601 et seq.);
     does not contain any unfunded mandate or significantly or
uniquely affect small governments, as described in the Unfunded
Mandates Reform Act of 1995 (Pub. L. 104-4);
     does not have federalism implications as specified in
Executive Order 13132 (64 FR 43255, August 10, 1999);
     is not an economically significant regulatory action based
on health or safety risks subject to Executive Order 13045 (62 FR
19885, April 23, 1997);
     is not a significant regulatory action subject to
Executive Order 13211 (66 FR 28355, May 22, 2001);
     is not subject to requirements of Section 12(d) of the
National Technology Transfer and Advancement Act of 1995 (15 U.S.C. 272
note) because application of those requirements would be inconsistent
with the CAA; and
     does not provide EPA with the discretionary authority to
address, as appropriate, disproportionate human health or environmental
effects, using practicable and legally permissible methods, under
Executive Order 12898 (59 FR 7629, February 16, 1994).
    In addition, this proposed rule pertaining to Maryland's new
regulations for AIM coatings under COMAR 26.11.39, does not have tribal
implications as specified by Executive Order 13175 (65 FR 67249,
November 9, 2000), because the SIP is not approved to apply in Indian
country located in the state, and EPA notes that it will not impose
substantial direct costs on tribal governments or preempt tribal law.

List of Subjects in 40 CFR Part 52

    Environmental protection, Air pollution control, Incorporation by
reference, Ozone, Reporting and recordkeeping requirements, Volatile
organic compounds.

    Authority:  42 U.S.C. 7401 et seq.

    Dated: November 10, 2016.
Shawn M. Garvin,
Regional Administrator, Region III.
[FR Doc. 2016-28436 Filed 11-25-16; 8:45 am]
 BILLING CODE 6560-50-P


[Federal Register Volume 76, Number 196 (Tuesday, October 11, 2011)]
[Notices]
[Pages 62804-62805]
[FR Doc No: 2011-26120]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission

Notice of FERC Staff Attendance at the Entergy Regional State
Committee Work Group and Stakeholder Meeting

    The Federal Energy Regulatory Commission hereby gives notice that
members of its staff may attend the meeting noted below. Their
attendance is part of the Commission's ongoing outreach efforts.

Entergy Regional State Committee Work Group and Stakeholder Meeting

October 19, 2011 (9 a.m.-3 p.m.)

    This meeting will be held at the Pan American Life Center, 601
Poydras Street, New Orleans, LA 70130.
    The discussions may address matters at issue in the following
proceedings:

Docket No. OA07-32.....................  Entergy Services, Inc.
Docket No. EL00-66.....................  Louisiana Public Service
                                          Commission v. Entergy
                                          Services, Inc.
Docket No. EL01-88.....................  Louisiana Public Service
                                          Commission v. Entergy
                                          Services, Inc.
Docket No. EL07-52.....................  Louisiana Public Service
                                          Commission v. Entergy
                                          Services, Inc.
Docket No. EL08-51.....................  Louisiana Public Service
                                          Commission v. Entergy
                                          Services, Inc.
Docket No. EL08-60.....................  Ameren Services Co. v. Entergy
                                          Services, Inc.
Docket No. EL09-43.....................  Arkansas Public Service
                                          Commission v. Entergy
                                          Services, Inc.
Docket No. EL09-50.....................  Louisiana Public Service
                                          Commission v. Entergy
                                          Services, Inc.
Docket No. EL09-61.....................  Louisiana Public Service
                                          Commission v. Entergy
                                          Services, Inc.
Docket No. EL10-55.....................  Louisiana Public Service
                                          Commission v. Entergy
                                          Services, Inc.
Docket No. EL10-65.....................  Louisiana Public Service
                                          Commission v. Entergy
                                          Services, Inc.
Docket No. EL11-34.....................  Midwest Independent System
                                          Transmission Operator, Inc.
Docket No. ER05-1065...................  Entergy Services, Inc.
Docket No. ER07-682....................  Entergy Services, Inc.
Docket No. ER07-956....................  Entergy Services, Inc.
Docket No. ER08-1056...................  Entergy Services, Inc.
Docket No. ER09-833....................  Entergy Services, Inc.
Docket No. ER09-1224...................  Entergy Services, Inc.
Docket No. ER10-794....................  Entergy Services, Inc.
Docket No. ER10-1350...................  Entergy Services, Inc.
Docket No. ER10-1676...................  Entergy Services, Inc.
Docket No. ER10-2001...................  Entergy Arkansas, Inc.
Docket No. ER10-2161...................  Entergy Texas, Inc.
Docket No. ER10-2748...................  Entergy Services, Inc.
Docket No. ER10-3357...................  Entergy Arkansas, Inc.
Docket No. ER11-2131...................  Entergy Arkansas, Inc.
Docket No. ER11-2132...................  Entergy Gulf States, Louisiana,
                                          LLC.
Docket No. ER11-2133...................  Entergy Gulf States, Louisiana,
                                          LLC.
Docket No. ER11-2134...................  Entergy Mississippi, Inc.
Docket No. ER11-2135...................  Entergy New Orleans, Inc.
Docket No. ER11-2136...................  Entergy Texas, Inc.
Docket No. ER11-2161...................  Entergy Texas, Inc.
Docket No. ER11-3156...................  Entergy Arkansas, Inc.
Docket No. ER11-3157...................  Entergy Arkansas, Inc.
Docket No. ER11-3274...................  Entergy Arkansas, Inc.
Docket No. ER11-3728...................  Midwest Independent
                                          Transmission System Operator,
                                          Inc.
Docket No. ER11-3657...................  Entergy Arkansas, Inc.
Docket No. ER11-3658...................  Entergy Arkansas, Inc.

    These meetings are open to the public.
    For more information, contact Patrick Clarey, Office of Energy
Market Regulation, Federal Energy Regulatory Commission at (317) 249-
5937 or<EMAIL_ADDRESS>
    Dated: October 3, 2011.
Kimberly D. Bose,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2011-26120 Filed 10-7-11; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6717-01-P


[Federal Register Volume 85, Number 166 (Wednesday, August 26, 2020)]
[Notices]
[Pages 52592-52594]
[FR Doc No: 2020-18708]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY

[EPA-HQ-OPP-2015-0769; FRL-10013-91]

Difenacoum; Product Cancellation Order for Certain Pesticide
Registrations

AGENCY: Environmental Protection Agency (EPA).

ACTION: Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: This notice announces EPA's order for the cancellations to
terminate uses, voluntarily requested by the registrant and accepted by
the Agency, of the products listed in Table 1 and Table 2 of Unit II,
pursuant to the Federal Insecticide, Fungicide, and Rodenticide Act
(FIFRA). This cancellation order follows a June 14, 2018 Federal
Register Notice of Receipt of Requests from the registrant listed in
Table 3 of Unit II to voluntarily cancel these product registrations.
In the June 14, 2018 notice, EPA indicated that it would issue an order
implementing the cancellations and amendments to terminate uses, unless
the Agency received substantive comments within the 30-day comment
period that would merit its further review of these requests, or unless
the registrant withdrew their requests. The Agency received no comments
on the notice. Further, the registrant did not withdraw their requests.
Accordingly, EPA hereby issues in this notice a cancellation order
granting the requested cancellations. Any distribution, sale, or use of
the products subject to this cancellation order is permitted only in
accordance with the terms of this order, including any existing stocks
provisions.

DATES: The cancellations are effective August 26, 2020.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Steven Snyderman, Pesticide Re-
evaluation Division (7502P), Office of Pesticide Programs,
Environmental Protection Agency, 1200 Pennsylvania Ave. NW, Washington,
DC 20460-0001; telephone number:<PHONE_NUMBER>; email address:
<EMAIL_ADDRESS>
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

I. General Information

A. Does this action apply to me?

    This action is directed to the public in general, and may be of
interest to a wide range of stakeholders including environmental, human
health, and agricultural advocates; the chemical industry; pesticide
users; and members of the public interested in the sale, distribution,
or use of pesticides. Since others also may be interested, the Agency
has not attempted to describe all the specific entities that may be
affected by this action.

B. How can I get copies of this document and other related information?

    The docket for this action, identified by docket identification
(ID) number EPA-HQ-OPP-2015-0769, is available at http://www.regulations.gov or at the Office of Pesticide Programs Regulatory
Public Docket (OPP Docket) in the Environmental Protection Agency
Docket Center (EPA/DC), West William Jefferson Clinton Bldg., Rm. 3334,
1301 Constitution Ave. NW, Washington, DC 20460-0001. The Public
Reading Room is open from 8:30 a.m. to 4:30 p.m., Monday through
Friday, excluding legal holidays. The telephone number for the Public
Reading Room is<PHONE_NUMBER>, and the telephone number for the OPP
Docket is<PHONE_NUMBER>.
    Due to the public health concerns related to COVID-19, the EPA
Docket Center (EPA/DC) and Reading Room is closed to visitors with
limited exceptions. The staff continues to provide remote customer
service via email, phone, and webform. For the latest status
information on EPA/DC services and docket access, visit https://www.epa.gov/dockets.

II. What action is the Agency taking?

    This notice announces the cancellations, as requested by
registrant, of products registered under FIFRA section 3 (7 U.S.C.
136a). These registrations are listed in sequence by registration
number in Table 1 of this unit.

                Table 1--Difenacoum Product Cancellations
------------------------------------------------------------------------
       Registration No.             Product name            Company
------------------------------------------------------------------------
36488-63.....................  Difenacoum Rat and      Woodstream
                                Mouse Block IV.         Corporation.
36488-64.....................  Difenacoum Rat and      Woodstream
                                Mouse Place Packs IV.   Corporation.
36488-65.....................  Difenacoum Rat and      Woodstream
                                Mouse Pellets IV.       Corporation.
36488-66.....................  Technical Difenacoum..  Woodstream
                                                        Corporation.
47629-12.....................  Difenacoum Technical..  Woodstream
                                                        Corporation.
47629-14.....................  Difenacoum Rat and      Woodstream
                                Mouse Pellets.          Corporation.
47629-16.....................  Difenacoum Rat and      Woodstream
                                Mouse Blocks.           Corporation.
47629-17.....................  Difenacoum Rat and      Woodstream
                                Mouse Place Packs.      Corporation.
------------------------------------------------------------------------

    Table 2 of this unit includes the names and addresses of record for
all the registrants of the products listed in Table 1 of this unit, in
sequence by EPA company number. This number corresponds to the first
part of the EPA registration numbers of the products listed in Table 1
of this unit.

               Table 2--Registrants of Cancelled Products.
------------------------------------------------------------------------
          EPA Company No.                 Company name and address
------------------------------------------------------------------------
36488.............................  Woodstream Corporation, 69 N Locust
                                     St., P.O. Box 327, Lititz, PA
                                     17543.
47629.............................  Woodstream Corporation, 69 N Locust
                                     St., P.O. Box 327, Lititz, PA
                                     17543.
------------------------------------------------------------------------

III. Summary of Public Comments Received and Agency Response to
Comments

    During the public comment period provided, EPA received no comments
in response to the June 14, 2018 Federal Register notice announcing the
Agency's receipt of the requests for voluntary cancellation of products
listed in Table 1 of Unit II.

IV. Cancellation Order

    Pursuant to FIFRA section 6(f) (7 U.S.C. 136d(f)(1)), EPA hereby
approves the requested cancellations of the registrations identified in
Table 1 of Unit II. Accordingly, the Agency hereby orders that the
product registrations identified in Table 1 of Unit II are cancelled.
The effective date of the cancellations and amendments listed in Table
1 that are subject of this notice is August 26, 2020. Any distribution,
sale, or use of existing stocks of the products identified in Table 1
of Unit II in a manner inconsistent with any of the provisions for
disposition of existing stocks set forth in Unit VI will be a violation
of FIFRA.

V. What is the Agency's authority for taking this action?

    Section 6(f)(1) of FIFRA (7 U.S.C. 136d(f)(1)) provides that a
registrant of a pesticide product may at any time request that any of
its pesticide registrations be cancelled or amended to terminate one or
more uses. FIFRA further provides that, before acting on the request,
EPA must publish a notice of receipt of any such request in the Federal
Register. Thereafter, following the public comment period, the EPA
Administrator may approve such a request. The notice of receipt for
this action was published for comment in the Federal Register of June
14, 2018 (83 FR 115) (FRL-9978-37). The comment period closed on July
16, 2018.

VI. Provisions for Disposition of Existing Stocks

    Existing stocks are those stocks of registered pesticide products
which are currently in the United States and which were packaged,
labeled, and released for shipment prior to the effective date of the
action. The existing stocks provision for the products subject to this
order is as follows.
    For voluntary product cancellations, identified in Table 1 of Unit
II, in conjunction with the publication of the cancellation order in
the Federal Register, the registrant is no longer permitted to sell and
distribute existing stocks, except for export consistent with

FIFRA section 17 (7 U.S.C. 1360) or for proper disposal.
    Persons other than the registrant may sell, distribute, or use
existing stocks of cancelled products until supplies are exhausted,
provided that such sale, distribution, or use is consistent with the
terms of the previously approved labeling on, or that accompanied, the
cancelled products.

    Authority: 7 U.S.C. 136 et seq.

    Dated: August 14, 2020.
Mary Reaves,
Acting Director, Pesticide Re-Evaluation Division, Office of Pesticide
Programs.
[FR Doc. 2020-18708 Filed 8-25-20; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6560-50-P


Cropland Loads Entering RF3 Network and Reductions for Large CAFOS Sector Baseline Option 1 Option 2 Option 3 Option 5a Option 5 Option 6 Option 7 Cattle 0 0 0 0 0 N/ A 24 0 Dairy 0 0 0 0 0 N/ A 8 0 Swine 0 0 0 0 N/ A 0 37 0 Poultry 0 0 0 0 0 N/ A 100 0 Poultry ( wet) 0 0 0 0 N/ A 0 13 0 Total 0 0 0 0 0 0 183 0 Sector Baseline Option 1 Option 2 Option 3 Option 5a Option 5 Option 6 Option 7 Cattle 0 0 0 0 0 N/ A 61 0 Dairy 0 0 0 0 0 N/ A 10 0 Swine 0 0 0 0 N/ A 0 16 0 Poultry 0 0 0 0 0 N/ A 39 0 Poultry ( wet) 0 0 0 0 N/ A 0 6 0 Total 0 0 0 0 0 0 132 0 Sector Baseline Option 1 Option 2 Option 3 Option 5a Option 5 Option 6 Option 7 Cattle 0 0 0 0 0 N/ A 10094 0 Dairy 0 0 0 0 0 N/ A 1744 0 Swine 0 0 0 0 N/ A 0 2823 0 Poultry 0 0 0 0 0 N/ A 10824 0 Poultry ( wet) 0 0 0 0 N/ A 0 787 0 Total 0 0 0 0 0 0 26273 0 Sector Baseline Option 1 Option 2 Option 3 Option 5a Option 5 Option 6 Option 7 Cattle 0 0 0 0 0 N/ A 36 0 Dairy 0 0 0 0 0 N/ A 0 0 Swine 0 0 0 0 N/ A 0 0 0 Poultry 0 0 0 0 0 N/ A 0 0 Poultry ( wet) 0 0 0 0 N/ A 0 0 0 Total 0 0 0 0 0 0 37 0 Sector Baseline Option 1 Option 2 Option 3 Option 5a Option 5 Option 6 Option 7 Cattle 0 0 0 0 0 N/ A 19 0 Dairy 0 0 0 0 0 N/ A 0 0 Swine 0 0 0 0 N/ A 0 0 0 Poultry 0 0 0 0 0 N/ A 26 0 Poultry ( wet) 0 0 0 0 N/ A 0 0 0 Total 0 0 0 0 0 0 45 0 Table A 7. Fecal streptococcus loads from Large CAFOs in 1019 colony forming units. Table A 3. Nitrogen loads from Large CAFOs in millions of pounds per year.

Table A 4. Phosphorous loads from Large CAFOs in millions of pounds per year.

Table A 5. Sediment loads from Large CAFOs in millions of pounds per year.

Table A 6. Fecal coliform loads from Large CAFOs in 1019 colony forming units. Cropland Loads Entering RF3 Network and Reductions for Large CAFOS Sector Baseline Option 1 Option 2 Option 3 Option 5a Option 5 Option 6 Option 7 Cattle 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 N/ A 2.6 0.0 Dairy 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 N/ A 2.3 0.0 Swine 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 N/ A 0.0 3.3 0.0 Poultry 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 N/ A 9.4 0.0 Poultry ( wet) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 N/ A 0.0 1.1 0.0 Total 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 18.8 0.0 Sector Baseline Option 1 Option 2 Option 3 Option 5a Option 5 Option 6 Option 7 Cattle 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 N/ A 0.0 0.0 Dairy 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 N/ A 0.0 0.0 Swine 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 N/ A 0.0 0.0 0.0 Poultry 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 N/ A 0.0 0.0 Poultry ( wet) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 N/ A 0.0 0.0 0.0 Total 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Sector Option 1 Option 2 Option 3 Option 5a Option 5 Option 6 Option 7 Cattle 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 N/ A  24.5 0.0 Dairy 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 N/ A  8.1 0.0 Swine 0.00 0.0 0.0 N/ A 0.0  37.2 0.0 Poultry 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 N/ A  99.5 0.0 Poultry ( wet) 0.0 0.0 0.0 N/ A 0.0  13.5 0.0 Total 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 ( 182.8) 0.0 Sector Option 1 Option 2 Option 3 Option 5a Option 5 Option 6 Option 7 Cattle 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 N/ A  61.2 0.0 Dairy 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 N/ A  10.1 0.0 Swine 0.0 0.0 0.0 N/ A 0.0  15.9 0.0 Poultry 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 N/ A  39.3 0.0 Poultry ( wet) 0.0 0.0 0.0 N/ A 0.0  5.9 0.0 Total 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 ( 132.3) 0.0 Sector Option 1 Option 2 Option 3 Option 5a Option 5 Option 6 Option 7 Cattle 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 N/ A  10094.4 0.0 Dairy 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 N/ A  1744.0 0.0 Swine 0.0 0.0 0.0 N/ A 0.0  2823.5 0.0 Poultry 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 N/ A  10823.7 0.0 Poultry ( wet) 0.0 0.0 0.0 N/ A 0.0  787.4 0.0 Total 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 ( 26272.9) 0.0 Table A 8. Metals loads from Large CAFOs in millions of pounds per year.

Table A X. BOD loads from Large CAFOs in millions of pounds per year.

Table A 9. Nitrogen load reductions from Large CAFOs in millions of pounds per year. Numbers in ( ) indicate negative values.

Table A 10. Phosphorous load reductions from Large CAFOs in millions of pounds per year.

Table A 11. Sediment load reductions from Large CAFOs in millions of pounds per year. Numbers in ( ) indicate negative values. Cropland Loads Entering RF3 Network and Reductions for Large CAFOS Sector Option 1 Option 2 Option 3 Option 5a Option 5 Option 6 Option 7 Cattle 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 N/ A  36.5 0.0 Dairy 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 N/ A 0.0 0.0 Swine 0.0 0.0 0.0 N/ A 0.0 0.0 0.0 Poultry 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 N/ A  0.5 0.0 Poultry ( wet) 0.0 0.0 0.0 N/ A 0.0  0.1 0.0 Total 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 ( 37.0) 0.0 Sector Option 1 Option 2 Option 3 Option 5a Option 5 Option 6 Option 7 Cattle 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 N/ A  19.1 0.0 Dairy 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 N/ A 0.0 0.0 Swine 0.0 0.0 0.0 N/ A 0.0 0.0 0.0 Poultry 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 N/ A  25.6 0.0 Poultry ( wet) 0.0 0.0 0.0 N/ A 0.0  0.1 0.0 Total 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 ( 44.9) 0.0 Sector Option 1 Option 2 Option 3 Option 5a Option 5 Option 6 Option 7 Cattle 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 N/ A  2.6 0.0 Dairy 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 N/ A  2.3 0.0 Swine 0.0 0.0 0.0 N/ A 0.0  3.3 0.0 Poultry 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 N/ A  9.4 0.0 Poultry ( wet) 0.0 0.0 0.0 N/ A 0.0  1.1 0.0 Total 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 ( 18.8) 0.0 Sector Option 1 Option 2 Option 3 Option 5a Option 5 Option 6 Option 7 Cattle 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 N/ A 0.0 0.0 Dairy 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 N/ A 0.0 0.0 Swine 0.0 0.0 0.0 N/ A 0.0 0.0 0.0 Poultry 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 N/ A 0.0 0.0 Poultry ( wet) 0.0 0.0 0.0 N/ A 0.0 0.0 0.0 Total 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Table A 13. Fecal streptococcus load reductions from Large CAFOs in 1019 colony forming units.

Table A Y. BOD load reductions from Large CAFOs in millions of pounds per year. Table A 12. Fecal coliform load reductions from Large CAFOs in 1019 colony forming units.

Table A 14. Metals load reductions from Large CAFOs in millions of pounds per year. Numbers in ( ) indicate negative values.