[Federal Register Volume 76, Number 116 (Thursday, June 16, 2011)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Pages 35276-35294]
[FR Doc No: 2011-14705]

Vol. 76

Thursday,

No. 116

June 16, 2011

Part II

Department of Commerce

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

Bureau of Industry and Security

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

15 CFR Parts 732, 738, 740, et al.

Export Control Reform Initiative: Strategic Trade Authorization License
Exception; Final Rule

Federal Register / Vol. 76, No. 116 / Thursday, June 16, 2011 / Rules
and Regulations

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE

Bureau of Industry and Security

15 CFR Parts 732, 738, 740, 743, and 774

[Docket No. 100923470-1230-03]
RIN 0694-AF03

Export Control Reform Initiative: Strategic Trade Authorization
License Exception

AGENCY: Bureau of Industry and Security, Commerce.

ACTION: Final Rule.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: This rule adds a new license exception to the Export
Administration Regulations (EAR) that authorizes the export, reexport,
and transfer (in-country) of specified items to destinations that pose
relatively low risk that those items will be used for a purpose that
license requirements are designed to prevent. Use of the exception is
conditioned upon the creation and exchange by the parties to the
transaction of notifications and statements designed to provide
assurance against diversion of such items to other destinations. The
exception is only relevant to exports, reexports, and transfers for
which a license is required under the EAR. Thus, if the EAR do not
impose an obligation to apply for and receive a license before
exporting, reexporting, or transferring an item subject to the EAR, STA
is not relevant to the transaction. The exception does not alter any of
the General Prohibitions in the EAR against unlicensed exports,
reexports, or transfers to proscribed end users, end uses, or
destinations. This rule, has been cleared by several departments,
including Defense, State, Homeland Security, and Justice. This rule is
part of the Administration's Export Control Reform Initiative,
undertaken as a result of the fundamental review of the U.S. export
control system that the President announced in August 2009.

DATES: Effective date June 16, 2011.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: William Arvin, Regulatory Policy
Division, Bureau of Industry and Security<EMAIL_ADDRESS>or
202-482-2440.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

Background

The Administration's Export Control Reform Initiative

    In August 2009, the President directed a broad-based interagency
review of the U.S. export control system with the goal of strengthening
national security and the competitiveness of key U.S. manufacturing and
technology sectors by focusing on current threats and adapting to the
changing economic and technological landscape. The review determined
that the current export control system is overly complicated, contains
too many redundancies, and, in trying to protect too much, diminishes
our ability to focus our efforts on the most critical national security
priorities. See, e.g., August 30, 2010 press release by the White
House, Office of the Press Secretary at http://www.whitehouse.gov/the-press-office/2010/08/30/president-obama-laysfoundation-a-new-export-controlsystem-strengthen-n. As a result, the Administration has begun
the Export Control Reform Initiative, which will fundamentally reform
the U.S. export control system. The Export Control Reform Initiative is
designed to enhance U.S. national security and strengthen the United
States' ability to counter threats such as the proliferation of weapons
of mass destruction. The Administration determined that fundamental
reform is needed with transformation to a single control list, a single
licensing agency, a single information technology system, and a single
primary enforcement coordination agency. The Administration is
implementing the reform in three phases. The first two phases involve
short-and medium-term adjustments to the current export control system,
with a focus on establishing harmonized control lists and processes
among the Departments of Commerce, State, and the Treasury to the
extent practicable in order to build toward the third phase of the
single control list, licensing agency, information technology system,
and enforcement coordination agency. Under this approach, new criteria
for determining what items need to be controlled and a common set of
policies for determining when an export license is required will be
implemented. The control list criteria will be based on transparent
rules, which will reduce the uncertainty faced by our allies, U.S.
industry, and its foreign partners, and will allow the government to
erect higher enforcement walls around the most sensitive items in order
to enhance national security.

A New License Exception as an Initial Step in Reform

    License Exception Strategic Trade Authorization (STA) authorizes,
with conditions, the export, reexport and transfer (in-country) of
specified items to destinations that pose relatively low risk of
unauthorized uses. To safeguard against reexports to destinations that
are not authorized under License Exception STA, License Exception STA
imposes certain notification and consignee statement requirements. The
exception does not alter any of the General Prohibitions in the EAR
against exports, reexports, or transfers to proscribed end users, end
uses, or destinations. Under the direction of the Office of Management
and Budget, this rule was reviewed and cleared by the Departments of
Defense, State, Energy, the Treasury, Homeland Security, and Justice.
    The exception is only relevant to exports, reexports, and transfers
for which a license is required under the EAR. Thus, if the EAR do not
impose an obligation to apply for and receive a license before
exporting, reexporting, or transferring an item subject to the EAR, STA
is not relevant to the transaction. For exports, reexports, and
transfers where STA is relevant, its use is optional. Parties may use
other license exceptions that authorize a planned transaction or apply
for a license if they prefer to do so.
    On December 9, 2010, BIS issued a proposed rule (75 FR 76653)
describing the proposed new License Exception STA that would be an
initial step in the Export Control Reform Initiative. BIS received 41
submissions commenting on the proposed rule. They are available for
review at: http://www.regulations.gov (ID  BIS-2010-0038) and
on http://efoia.bis.doc.gov/pubcomm/records-of-comments/record_of_comments_sta.pdf. This final rule implements License Exception STA. It
reflects review and analysis of the public comments. A summary of the
comments and responses are provided below under ``Review of Public
Comments.''

Summary of Changes in the Final Rule as Compared to the Proposed Rule

    Releases of software source code and technology: Section 740.20
makes specific reference to releases within a single country of
software source code and technology to foreign nationals and provides a
different notification procedure than that required for exports,
reexports and other in country transfers. These changes are in response
to public comments. They are described below under the topic heading
``review of public comments.''
    Clarification of terminology in Sec.  740.20: The term
``transactions'' in Sec.  740.20 has been replaced with the more
explicit ``exports, reexports and in country transfers'' to avoid
confusion that might otherwise arise when a single shipment or single
sale includes some

items that are subject to License Exception STA and some that are not.
Items in such shipment or sale that are not being exported, reexported
or transferred pursuant to License Exception STA need not meet the
requirements of License Exception STA.
    Notification to consignee, consignee statement and destination
control statement: The revised provisions of Sec.  740.20(d) are based
on consideration of the public's comments regarding the proposed
notification requirements. The final rule retains the requirement to
furnish to the consignee the ECCN of each item to be shipped to the
consignee, but does not require that the ECCN be furnished for every
successive shipment of the item at issue to the same consignee so long
as the ECCN remains accurate. In addition, one consignee statement may
be used for multiple shipments. The final rule, however, requires the
exporter, reexporter, or transferor to keep a log or other written
record that identifies each shipment made under License Exception STA
and identifies the specific consignee statement that is associated with
each shipment. In addition, the destination control statement described
in the proposed rule is replaced with a more general notice
requirement. The changes are described below under the topic heading
``Final Rule Revisions to License Exception STA Safeguards.'' As
revised, Sec.  740.20(d) provides the proper assurances that items
shipped under License Exception STA will remain within the group of low
risk destinations without posing excessive and complex burdens on
parties trading in items subject to the EAR.
    STA paragraphs: Based on a suggestion in the public comments, the
STA license exception paragraphs in 49 ECCNs have been revised to state
more clearly that they apply only to the destinations listed in
paragraph (c)(2) of Sec.  740.20 and not to STA as a whole. This change
is described below under the topic heading ``review of public
comments.''
    Removal of EI eligibility: Items controlled for encryption (EI)
reasons are ineligible for License Exception STA, because of a
determination that License Exception STA is not the appropriate
approach to addressing the government interests in encryption export
controls. Accordingly, BIS will address encryption-related aspects of
the Export Control Reform Initiative separately.
    Removal of pathogen and toxin eligibility: Items described in ECCNs
1C351.a, .b, .c, d.5, .d.6 or .e; 1C352; 1C353; 1C354; 1C360; 1E001
(for 1C351.a, .b, .c, .d.5, .d.6 or .e, 1C352, 1C353, 1C354 or 1C360)
or in ECCN 1E351 may not be exported, reexported, or transferred under
the authority of License Exception STA. The potential of these items to
make a direct contribution to the creation of weapons of mass
destruction and United States Government policy to deter the spread of
chemical and biological weapons warrants excluding them from STA
eligibility.
    Items in ECCN 1C351.d.1, .2, .3, .4, .7, .8, .9, or .10 may be
exported, reexported, or transferred under the authority of License
Exception STA in quantities up to 100 milligrams of any one toxin per
shipment and no more than six shipments may be sent to any one end user
in any one calendar year. Unlike the items described in the previous
paragraph, the items described in the ECCNs identified in this
paragraph have more widespread commercial and medical applications and
are not of a type that can be used to generate or grow large quantities
of the toxin. The quantity and frequency cap in this aspect of STA is
designed to allow for shipments under the exception to destinations of
relatively low risk for appropriate end uses, but not allow for even
the potential of unapproved stockpiling of such items in amounts that
would create proliferation threats.
    Modifications to License Exception GOV: Supplement No. 1 to Sec.
740.11 is revised to remove the prohibition on use of License Exception
GOV to export items controlled for chemical and biological weapons
reasons (CB) to agencies of cooperating governments (as defined in
Sec.  740.11(b)(3)(ii) of the EAR) and to their embassies and
consulates (as defined in Sec.  740.11(b)(2)(iv) of the EAR) located in
Country Group B (Supp. No. 1 to part 740 of the EAR). This change is
needed to facilitate the export of pathogens and toxins to governments
of cooperating countries to facilitate collaborative responses to
outbreaks of disease, whether man-made or naturally occurring, in the
absence of eligibility under License Exception STA as noted above.
    Removal of certain gas turbine engine related software and
technology eligibility: Section 740.20 is revised to make the following
software and technology ineligible for license exception STA.
    (A) License Exception STA may not be used for 9D001 or 9D002
``software'' that is specially designed or modified for the
``development'' or ``production'' of:
     Components of engines controlled by ECCN 9A001 if such
components incorporate any of the ``technologies'' controlled by
9E003.a.1, 9E003.a.2, 9E003.a.3, 9E003.a.4, 9E003.a.5, 9E003.c, 9E003.i
(other than technology for fan or power turbines), 9E003.h; or
     Equipment controlled by 9B001.
    (B) License Exception STA may not be used for 9D001 ``software''
that is specially designed or modified for the ``development'' of
``technology'' controlled by 9E003.a.1, 9E003.a.2, 9E003.a.3,
9E003.a.4, 9E003.a.5, 9E003.c, 9E003.i (other than technology for fan
or power turbines) or 9E003.h.
    (C) License Exception STA may not be used for 9D004.f or 9D004.g
``software''.
    (D) License Exception STA may not be used for 9E001 ``technology''
according to the General Technology Note for the ``development'' of
9A001.b engines or components of engines controlled by 9A001.b if such
components incorporate:
     Any of the ``technologies'' controlled by 9E003.a.1,
9E003.a.2, 9E003.a.3, 9E003.a.4, 9E003.a.5, 9E003.c, 9E003.i (other
than technology for fan or power turbines) or 9E003.h; or
     Any of the 9D001 or 9D002 software in paragraphs (A) or
(B) above.
    (E) License Exception STA may not be used for 9E002 ``technology''
according to the General Technology Note for the ``production'' of
components of engines controlled by 9A001.b if such components
incorporate any of the ``technologies'' controlled by 9E003.a.1,
9E003.a.2, 9E003.a.3, 9E003.a.4, 9E003.a.5, 9E003.c, 9E003.i (other
than technology for fan or power turbines), 9E003.h.
    (F) License Exception STA may not be used for ``technology'' in
9E003.a.1, 9E003.a.2, 9E003.a.3, 9E003.a.4, 9E003.a.5, 9E003.c, 9E003.i
(other than technology for fan or power turbines) or 9E003.h.
    A review of gas turbine engine technology has been unable to
establish a satisfactory method of distinguishing the foregoing gas
turbine engine technology and software that is within the scope of Tier
1 from such technology that is within the scope of Tier 2 (See 75 FR
76665, December 9, 2010 for an explanation of the Tier 1 and Tier 2
criteria). Accordingly, such technology and software may not be
exported under the authority of License Exception STA.
Removal of Unneeded License Exception STA Paragraph From ECCN 7D002
    License Exception STA paragraphs appeared in 50 ECCNs in the
proposed rule. Those paragraphs identified items that may not be
shipped under License Exception STA authorizing paragraph (c)(2) (Sec.
740.20(c)(2) of the EAR). In both

the proposed rule and this final rule the License Exception STA
paragraphs in the ECCNs have no effect on authorizing paragraph (c)(1)
of STA. Because software covered by ECCN 7D002 is controlled for
missile technology reasons (MT), such software is ineligible for either
authorizing paragraph (c)(1) or authorizing paragraph (c)(2) of License
Exception STA. This final rule accordingly does not include a License
Exception STA paragraph in ECCN 7D002.
Clarification of Applicability of Missile Technology Controls to ECCN
7E001 and 7E002
    ECCNs 7E001 and 7E002 apply inter alia to technology for the
development and production of equipment controlled by ECCNs 7A001,
7A002 and 7A003.d. ECCNs 7E001 and 7E002 impose a national security
reason for control on all of the technology that they cover and apply a
missile technology reason for control to technology for the development
or production of equipment controlled for missile technology reasons.
ECCNs 7A001, 7A002 and 7A003.d impose a national security reason for
control on all of the equipment that they cover and impose a missile
technology reason for control on such equipment if the equipment meets
the parameters of ECCN 7A101, 7A102, or 7A103. That pattern is the
reverse of the pattern that prevails in the Commerce Control List,
where an item that is subject to an ECCN with a lower number as the
third character generally would not also be subject to an ECCN with a
higher number as the third character. To guard against the possibility
that readers will, as a result of this unusual pattern, erroneously
conclude that certain 7E001 and 7E002 technology is not subject to the
missile technology reason for control, this rule adds a sentence to the
license requirements sections of ECCN 7E001 and 7E002 reminding readers
that technology for 7A001, 7A002 and 7A003.d equipment is subject to
the missile technology reason for control if that equipment meets the
parameters of 7A101, 7A102 or 7A103.
Revisions to Eligible Destinations and Removal of Civil End-Use
Requirement
    In this final rule, 36 countries are included in Sec.
740.20(c)(1), which authorizes exports, reexports and in country
transfers that are subject to multiple reasons for control. Eight
destinations are included in Sec.  740.20(c)(2), which authorizes
export, reexports and in country transfers that are subject to national
security reasons for control. The paragraph (c)(1) destinations are:
Argentina, Australia, Austria, Belgium, Bulgaria, Canada, Croatia,
Czech Republic, Denmark, Estonia, Finland, France, Germany, Greece,
Hungary, Iceland, Ireland, Italy, Japan, Latvia, Lithuania, Luxembourg,
Netherlands, New Zealand, Norway, Poland, Portugal, Romania, Slovakia,
Slovenia, South Korea, Spain, Sweden, Switzerland, Turkey, and the
United Kingdom. The paragraph (c)(2) destinations are: Albania, Hong
Kong, India, Israel, Malta, Singapore, South Africa, and Taiwan. This
final rule also removes the civil end use requirement that the proposed
rule applied to destinations listed in paragraph (c)(2).
    Preclusion of License Exception APR paragraph (b) in addition to
paragraph (a): As published in the proposed rule, this final rule
precludes use of License Exception APR paragraph (a) (Sec.  740.16(a)
of the EAR) for items that have been shipped pursuant to License
Exception STA. Also as published in the proposed rule, this final rule
requires consignees in subsequent exports, reexports and in country
transfers authorized by License Exception STA to acknowledge that
preclusion. However, paragraph (b) of License Exception APR authorizes
reexports to most of the destinations authorized by License Exception
STA and does not require such notice. Thus, under the proposed rule, a
party could receive via APR an item that previously had been shipped
under STA and would be unaware of the preclusion. To remedy this
inconsistent result, this final rule revises Sec.  740.20 to preclude
the use of License Exception APR paragraph (b) if an item previously
has been shipped under License Exception STA and to add acknowledgement
of that preclusion to the consignee statement required under License
Exception STA.
    Resolution of items under consideration for Tier 1.
    The preamble to the proposed rule stated the U.S. Government was
considering whether the following ECCNs, in whole or part: 0A919,
1A002, 3A001, 3A002, 3A003, 3A201, 3A228, 3A229, 3A232, 4A001, 4A003,
5A001, 6A001, 6A002, 6A003, 6A004, 6A005, 6A006, 7A001, 7A002, 7A003,
7A004, 7A006, 8A001, 8A018, 9A001, 9A004, 9A012 and 9A018 and the
technology ECCNs related to them, met the Tier 1 criteria and thus
would be excluded from the scope of License Exception STA. Commenters
on the proposed rule addressed 1A002, 3A001, 6A001, 6A002, 6A003,
6A005, 7A004, 8A001, 9A001, 9A004, 9A018, 1E001, 6E002, and 9E003.
Generally, those comments provided support that certain specific items
covered by those ECCNs are widely available from suppliers abroad,
including suppliers in destinations not eligible to receive items under
License Exception STA under the proposed rule.
    Because planned export control tiers have not yet been established,
nothing can formally be assigned to an export control tier at this
time. However, after reviewing the public comments and consulting with
other government agencies, BIS has concluded that the ECCNs, or
portions thereof, that should be removed from the scope of STA at this
time are those identified in Sec.  740.20(b)(2) of this final rule.
    Continuing efforts to improve export controls and refine License
Exception STA.
    As part of the President's Export Control Reform Initiative, the
process of identifying the appropriate export control tier for each
item on the Commerce Control List will continue. In addition, agencies
will continue to study two specific issues related License Exception
STA.
    One issue is whether some ``build to print technology'' related to
gas turbine engine components and controlled under ECCN 9E002 can be
made eligible for License Exception STA while excluding more critical
technology. In this instance, the term ``build to print technology''
refers to information that describes the physical and dimensional
characteristics of a component, but does not reveal how to perform the
processes that are used to produce a component with those physical and
dimensional characteristics.
    Another issue for further review is whether technology controlled
under ECCN 2E003.f related to the application of certain coatings is,
in whole or in part, appropriate for exclusion from License Exception
STA.
Review of Public Comments

Public Comments

    Some commenters remarked on the overall nature of License Exception
STA. Many favored the concept in general and some noted that their own
organizations likely would require fewer licenses as a result of STA.
Others indicated that, as proposed, STA would provide little or no
utility for their organizations. Some suggested specific changes or
clarifications to STA or other steps that BIS could take in addition to
or in lieu of License Exception STA. These ideas and BIS's responses
are discussed below.
    Comments related to the general utility and feasibility of License
Exception STA.
    Comment 1: Commenters' opinions were divided on the utility of STA.

Some believed that the license exception would substantially reduce the
number of licenses needed by their organizations; others indicated that
it would result in little or no change with respect to their
transactions that are subject to the EAR.
    Response: BIS recognizes that License Exception STA does not
address all issues of public concern or even all issues that have been
identified as pointing to a need for export control reform. As noted in
the preamble to the proposed rule, License Exception STA is only one
step in the Administration's Export Control Reform Initiative. Other
measures will be needed to effect the remaining aspects of that
initiative.
    Comment 2: One commenter stated that STA provides no real benefit
that is not already obtainable under License Exception GBS and that the
latter lacks the documentation requirements and restrictions of STA.
Several commenters indicated that they thought the restrictions and
documentation requirements under STA would limit its utility.
    Response: BIS agrees that parties who engage only in transactions
that currently do not require licenses or that currently are eligible
for License Exception GBS would not benefit from License Exception STA.
A party may continue to use License Exception GBS to the extent the
export at issue is within the scope of that exception. However, because
License Exception STA is available for more ECCNs than is License
Exception GBS, some parties will benefit from this new license
exception.
    Comment 3: Several commenters expressed concern that STA did not go
far enough and cited unnamed ``government officials'' as having
predicted that STA will replace GBS once the State and Commerce lists
are merged.
    Response: BIS currently has no plan to remove License Exception GBS
from the EAR. Determining whether GBS will be needed in a regulatory
scheme based on a single control list is premature and beyond the scope
of the proposed rule.
    Comment 4: Some commenters expressed concern that without broader
license exceptions, BIS might be unable to handle the volume of
licenses that it is likely to encounter once certain items are
transferred from the United States Munitions List to the Commerce
Control List. These commenters stated that although BIS's projection of
License Exception STA replacing over 3,000 licenses annually is not
insignificant, it is ``not a large portion of the low risk licensing
volume currently facing BIS.'' Finally, these commenters stated that
the State Department faced a 10,000 case backlog in 2007 and
recommended that BIS proactively address potential increases in exports
and minimize transaction-by-transaction authorization requirements in
order to avoid a similar situation.
    Response: BIS recognizes that a transfer of a large number of items
from the United States Munitions List to the Commerce Control List
could significantly increase BIS's workload and, without adequate
preparation, could result in backlogs and delays. BIS is working to
develop means for addressing those concerns. However, License Exception
STA is intended to provide a more efficient method of shipping items
currently subject to the EAR to destinations that present a relatively
low risk of diversion. Concerns about future transfers of items from
the United States Munitions List are beyond the scope of the proposed
rule.
    Comment 5: Some commenters on this topic proposed a range of
changes to the EAR other than License Exception STA to address to the
perceived need for fewer situations in which transaction-by-transaction
authorization is required. Such proposals were: (i) Simply removing
license requirements by removing X's from the boxes in the Country
Chart table [Supp. No. 1 to part 738 of the EAR]; (ii) broadening the
validated end-user program; (iii) creating an open general license
similar to that used by the United Kingdom; and (iv) creating an intra-
company transfer license that imposes fewer requirements on users than
BIS's 2008 proposal on that subject.
    Response: License Exception STA is intended as an initial step in a
broad export control reform effort. It recognizes, consistent with U.S.
international commitments, a limited group of destinations in which the
risk of diversion to unauthorized destinations, parties or uses is low.
It also imposes certain safeguards to provide reasonable assurance that
items exported, reexported, or transferred pursuant to STA will not be
diverted outside that group. Each of the types of proposed revisions
noted above was considered. BIS ultimately determined that a license
exception approach is the best way to address the goals of this aspect
of the reform effort, which primarily include reducing the licensing
burden with respect to exports to a limited group of destinations,
consistent with U.S. international commitments, without a wholesale
revision of the EAR, creating a method of notifying foreign consignees
about the prohibitions on reexports outside such destinations, avoiding
unintentionally re-imposing previously removed controls, and creating
records sufficient for monitoring and enforcement of parties'
compliance with the conditions and obligations of STA.
Comments Regarding Clarity
    Comment 6: One commenter stated that the effects of License
Exception STA on encryption are unclear and asked whether License
Exception ENC reporting requirements apply to an encryption item
exported under License Exception STA.
    Response: The final rule does not permit items controlled for
encryption reasons to be exported, reexported or transferred under
License Exception STA. Accordingly, any lack of clarity on this point
that may have been present in the proposed rule need not be addressed
in the final rule.
    Comment 7: One commenter stated that BIS needs to make clear that
items controlled for antiterrorism (AT) reasons are not excluded from
STA. The commenter noted that a license is not required for AT reasons
for any STA eligible destination.
    Response: This commenter's observation about the lack of an AT
license requirement for any STA eligible destination is correct with
respect to destination-based license requirements (although Part 744 of
the EAR may impose an AT license requirement for specific end uses or
end users in any destination). Like other License Exceptions in the
EAR, STA would be used only where a license requirement exists; if no
license is required there is no need to consider STA or any other
license exception. Although most ECCNs include antiterrorism as a
reason for control, that reason for control currently imposes a license
requirement for only five destinations, none of which is eligible for
STA. Although the absence of a reference to antiterrorism controls in
License Exception STA might cause some readers to conclude erroneously
that items controlled for antiterrorism reasons may not be shipped
under license exception STA, adding such a reference might cause some
readers to conclude erroneously that exports, reexports, and in country
transfers to which antiterrorism controls do apply may be consummated
under License Exception STA. The latter error has greater potential for
harm than the former. Therefore, BIS does not believe that a change to
the regulatory text on this point is desirable.
    Comments regarding deemed exports.
    Comment 8: Two commenters addressed the applicability of License
Exception STA to deemed exports. One

indicated that it read the proposed rule as permitting License
Exception STA to be used for deemed exports but suggested that specific
authorizing language be added to STA for clarity. Another stated that
STA would be useful for deemed exports and would be useful for some
exports to some foreign subsidiary employees.
    Response: BIS's intent in publishing the proposed rule was for
License Exception STA to authorize deemed exports. However, upon
further review, BIS has concluded that the requirements to furnish
ECCNs, to obtain a consignee statement, and to provide a destination
control statement are not likely to be relevant or useful in deemed
export situations, which typically involve an employer-employee
relationship or researcher collaborations. Accordingly, this final rule
changes Sec.  740.20 to address deemed exports and reexports separately
from other exports and reexports. Releases of source code and
technology are explicitly authorized. The authorization paragraphs
explicitly refer to nationals of the destinations listed therein.
Deemed exports and reexports are therefore explicitly authorized under
License Exception STA. The ECCN notification, consignee statement, and
destination control statement requirements are replaced with a
requirement that the releaser of the technology or source code notify
the recipient of the restrictions on further release. The notification
must either expressly inform the recipient that the EAR impose limits
on further disclosure or must be in the form of an agreement in which
the recipient agrees to limits on further disclosure. Any such
agreement must impose limits that are equivalent to or more restrictive
than all limits on further disclosure that are imposed by the EAR. The
notification must be in writing. The notification may be in a separate
document or included in a document such as a contract or a
nondisclosure agreement. If the document has an expiration date, it
must provide that the restrictions on disclosure do not expire.
    Recommendation for new process for public input on eligible ECCNs
for License Exception STA.
    Comment 9: One commenter recognized that statutory restrictions and
regime controls place some restrictions on BIS. That commenter,
however, recommended that BIS state in the final rule that it will
conduct regular reviews of ECCNs and set up a process whereby exporters
could submit a request to BIS setting forth the reasons that a
particular ECCN should be eligible for STA.
    Response: BIS is reviewing the Commerce Control List as a whole as
part of the Administration's Export Control Reform Initiative. In
addition, the EAR (including the Commerce Control List) will be subject
to the retrospective review requirements of Executive Order 13563.
Those who wish to recommend any change to License Exception STA or any
other provision of the EAR may do so in a number of ways, such as:
informal contacts with BIS; contacting one of the technical advisory
committees that advise BIS; or petitioning BIS for issuance, amendment
or repeal of a rule, as contemplated by Sec.  756.1(a)(1) of the EAR.
Although always open to suggestions, BIS does not plan to set up a
special process to receive proposed changes to License Exception STA.
    Comment on end use restrictions in Sec.  740.20(c)(2)(ii) in the
proposed rule.
    Comment 10: One commenter stated that by including the phrase
``other than a military end use as defined in Sec.  744.21 of the EAR''
in the definition of ``civil end use'' in proposed Sec.
740.20(c)(2)(ii), the proposed rule essentially took the China End Use
Rule and applied the foreign policy behind that rule to a much larger
group of countries even though many of those countries are not subject
to the same foreign policy considerations as is China.
    Response: Because the final rule does not include a civil end-use
requirement, a discussion of whether the definition of civil end-use in
Sec.  744.21 is appropriate for STA is unnecessary.
    Proposal to expand the scope of STA.
    Comment 11: One commenter recommended that STA should be available
for transactions where the exporter and consignee are the same
organization.
    Response: License Exception STA is available for transactions where
the exporter and the consignee are the same organization, but only if
they otherwise meet the requirements for use of the license exception.
    Eligible destination comments.
    Comment 12: Several commenters raised questions regarding the
limitations on License Exception STA eligibility for certain countries.
    Response: BIS has determined that for foreign policy reasons, the
lists of destinations eligible for License Exception STA shall be
limited to those destinations included in this final rule.
    Eligible items comments.
    Comment 13: Two commenters recommended that items controlled for
missile technology reasons should be made eligible for License
Exception STA under limited circumstances. One commenter stated that
such items are needed for use in public light water reactors. Another
commenter stated that the eligibility of certain items, which are in
Category 7 of the Commerce Control List, could be limited to equipment
required for or in support of safety of flight.
    Response: BIS does not have the discretion to include any item
controlled for export for missile technology reasons in License
Exception STA. Items are controlled on the Commerce Control List for
missile technology reasons because they are listed in the Missile
Technology Control Regime Annex. The exclusion of items on the Missile
Technology Control Regime Annex is based on Section 6(l) of the Export
Administration Act and the U.S. commitment to implement the Missile
Technology Control Regime Guidelines.
    Comment 14: One commenter stated that ECCNs 2B232 and 2E001 should
be eligible for STA. The commenter noted that manufacturers in China
and India make comparable products.
    Response: ECCN 2B232 and the portion of 2E001 that addresses
technology for the development of equipment controlled under 2B232 are
controlled for nuclear proliferation reasons. Under both the proposed
rule and this final rule, their License Exception STA eligibility is
limited to the destinations in Sec.  740.20(c)(1) for foreign policy
reasons.
    Comment 15: One commenter stated that it needs to ship items that
are covered by ECCN 2B350 predominantly to Taiwan, Singapore, China and
Israel. The commenter stated that it currently has about 100 licenses
and that license requirements make it uncompetitive and cause it to
lose business. This commenter asserted that similar parts made in South
Korea can get a license in one to two weeks. A better approach than the
proposed rule would be to allow less sensitive components to be
exported without a license to more destinations.
    Response: For such destinations as Taiwan, Singapore and Israel,
which are destinations listed in Sec.  740.20(c)(2), BIS proposed that
License Exception STA may be used for transactions in which the only
applicable reason for control is national security. ECCN 2B350 is
controlled for chemical and biological weapons reasons. BIS has
retained this limit in the final rule for foreign policy reasons.
    Comment 16: One commenter stated that exclusion of CCL Category 3
and 4 items would limit the utility of License Exception STA.
    Response: Commerce Control List Categories 3 and 4 are not excluded
in

their entirety from STA. All or portions of some ECCNs in Categories 3
and 4 are excluded from eligibility to the eight destinations listed in
Sec.  740.20(c)(2) because they cover items on the Wassenaar
Arrangement Sensitive List. This limitation on items eligible for
export to destinations listed in Sec.  740.20(c)(2) was included in the
proposed rule, and BIS has concluded that retaining the rule's limit of
eligibility for License Exception STA for these destinations to non-
Sensitive List items is appropriate for foreign policy reasons.
    Comment 17: One commenter stated that ECCN 6A002.a.2 and .a.3
should be eligible for Sec.  740.20(c)(1) destinations.
    Response: Under both the proposed rule and this final rule, ECCNs
6A002.a.2 and .a.3 are eligible for Sec.  740.20(c)(1) destinations
except for those portions of paragraph .a.3 that are subject to control
for missile technology (MT) reasons. For the reason noted in the
response to Comment 13 above, BIS is not making MT controlled items
eligible for License Exception STA. Portions of 6A002.a.2 and all of
6A002.a.3 are ineligible for Sec.  740.20(a)(2) destinations because
they are on the Wassenaar Arrangement Sensitive List.
    Comment 18: Two commenters stated that ECCN 6A003.b should be
eligible for the 127 destinations set forth in Sec.  740.20(c)(2) of
the proposed rule and one of those commenters also stated that ECCN
9A018.b should be eligible.
    Response: The STA paragraph for ECCN 6A003 excludes all of
paragraphs .b.3 and .b.4 from STA eligibility if the destination is one
of the destinations in paragraph (c)(2) of the proposed rule (eight
destinations in this final rule). BIS developed the STA paragraphs to
provide a reasonable balance between the policy of excluding items on
the Sensitive List from eligibility under Sec.  740.20(c)(2) and the
need to make the regulations as clear as possible within substantive
policy constraints. Rewriting the STA paragraph in 6A003 to match
exactly the Sensitive List would add significantly to the length and
complexity of the entry while providing relatively little change in the
scope of eligible transactions. Moreover, ECCN 6A003.b.3 and .b.4.b are
also controlled for regional stability reasons. Thus, even if the STA
paragraph in 6A003 were rewritten to match the text of the Sensitive
List exactly, the items in 6A003.b.3 and .b.4.b would continue to be
excluded from eligibility under Sec.  740.20(c)(2) because of their
regional stability control. ECCN 9A018.b is also subject to a regional
stability control and, consistent with the policy stated above, is not
eligible for Sec.  740.20(c)(2).
    Comment 19: One commenter recommended that ECCN 6A001.a.2.d.1
(certain underwater heading sensors), .a.2.b.7 (certain towed
hydrophone arrays) and .a.2.e.1 (certain bottom or bay cable systems)
be made eligible for Sec.  740.20(c)(2) destinations. Without such
eligibility, the ability to use STA to send repair items to vessels in
port is limited. These items do not require a license to go to
destinations in Country Group A:1 (Supp. No. 1 to Part 740 of the EAR),
which includes most of the destinations eligible under Sec.
740.20(c)(1). This commenter stated that if License Exception STA
results in the repeal of License Exception RPL, it would be at a
disadvantage.
    Response: This final rule excludes items listed on the Wassenaar
Arrangement Sensitive List from destinations listed in Sec.
740.20(c)(2). As set forth in the response to Comment 16, BIS has
concluded that limiting these destinations to non-Sensitive List items
is appropriate for foreign policy reasons. That said, BIS is not
eliminating License Exception RPL. In addition, BIS can make one change
to the 6A001 STA paragraph to track more accurately the Wassenaar
Arrangement Sensitive List without adding undue length and complexity
to the ECCN. Paragraph .a.2.a.4 is not on the Wassenaar Arrangement
Sensitive List. Therefore, BIS is adding the phrase ``except .a.2.a.4''
immediately following the phrase ``or 6A001.a.2 in the STA paragraph of
the License Exception Section of ECCN 6A001.''
    Comment 20: One commenter recommended that items in ECCN 8A001.c
(unmanned tethered submersible vehicles) be made eligible for Sec.
740.20(c)(2). The commenter noted that such vehicles already do not
require a license for most of the 37 destinations in proposed Sec.
740.20(c)(1) and so STA would not affect the licensing burden for these
items to any great degree. This commenter stated that allowing full STA
eligibility for these items would be consistent with the Wassenaar
Arrangement's best practices agreed to at the 2006 Wassenaar
Arrangement plenary meeting, which allows license exceptions for
sensitive list items. Other Wassenaar members allow exports without an
individual license. For example the United Kingdom permits such exports
under an open general license. The safeguards imposed by License
Exception STA allow for sensitive list items to be controlled and
monitored consistent with U.S. national security interests and regime
obligations. These vehicles cannot go far from their support vessel,
cannot be preprogrammed and require considerable support equipment. In
some cases a vessel or rig must be modified to handle the equipment and
restored when the equipment is removed making diversion of such
vehicles to military uses unlikely. Unmanned tethered submersible
vehicles are not as sensitive from a national security perspective as
untethered submersibles. Excluding 8A001.c unmanned tethered
submersible vehicles while allowing 8A001.a manned tethered
submersibles full STA treatment would be inconsistent.
    Response: Notwithstanding the arguments made in the Comment, BIS
has determined that retaining the limitation set forth in the proposed
rule that STA authorization for Wassenaar Arrangement Sensitive List
items (as 8A001.a items are) is available only to the destinations
listed in Sec.  740.20(c)(1) of this final rule is necessary for
foreign policy reasons.
    Comments on information and consignee statement requirements.
    BIS received a number of comments on the proposed requirements to
provide safeguards against diversion that were set forth in the
proposed rule. Those safeguards are: the requirement to provide the
consignee with the item description and ECCN; the requirement to obtain
assurances from the consignee; and the requirement to furnish a special
STA destination control statement. Some of the comments applied to the
safeguards as a whole and others to specific safeguard measures.
    Comments regarding the safeguards as a whole.
    Comment 21: Some commenters stated that manufacturers already have
processes in place to notify consignees not to reexport in violation of
the EAR and to provide ECCNs and destination control statements or that
language typically found in sales contracts and purchase order
agreements is a more effective means of communicating compliance
obligations.
    Response: Although BIS encourages parties trading in items subject
to the EAR to inform their customers of EAR requirements and
responsibilities of parties to the transaction, in general the EAR do
not require parties to do so. License Exception STA could not function
in its intended manner unless all exporters, reexporters, transferors
and consignees are aware of their specific responsibilities. Some form
of mandatory notice is, therefore, necessary.
    Comment 22: One commenter stated that the STA safeguards
transferred

compliance responsibilities from the exporter to the consignee.
    Response: BIS does not believe that the creation of License
Exception STA or the specific safeguard requirements that STA imposes
constitute a ``transfer'' of responsibilities from one party to
another. All parties dealing with items that are subject to the EAR are
responsible for compliance with those regulations. The safeguard
requirements of License Exception STA are intended to place parties on
notice of their responsibilities and to verify that they are aware of,
and will comply with, such responsibilities.
    Comments regarding the requirement to furnish the Export Control
Classification Number.
    Comment 23: Several commenters stated that the requirement to
furnish an ECCN is unnecessary. The reasons those gave were: ECCNs are
already provided on the invoice and air waybill; the EAR already
require the ECCN at least for the initial export; the ECCN is required
in the STA consignee statement; and it would be difficult for U.S.
exporters to verify that foreign buyers pass ECCN information along to
their customers.
    Response: Although BIS encourages parties to notify their
consignees of the EAR, compliance responsibilities, and other
information that would aid compliance such as ECCNs, such activities
are generally not required under the EAR. License Exception STA is
intended to remove the burden of applying for a license in exports,
reexports and in country transfers that are limited to certain
destinations where there is a relatively low risk of diversion.
Requiring that consignees be notified of the ECCN provides reasonable
assurance that the consignee will be on notice that the item it is
receiving is sensitive and that further distribution without a U.S.
license must be restricted to the destinations for which no license is
required, or for which STA or some other License Exception provides
authorization.
    The EAR do not require exporters to monitor the conduct of foreign
buyers to verify that they pass on ECCN information to their customers.
The EAR do, however, prohibit, among other things, selling,
transferring, transporting or servicing items subject to the EAR with
knowledge that a violation has, will, or is intended to take place with
respect to that item.
    Comment 24: One commenter asked who would be responsible if an
erroneous ECCN is supplied and, as a result, the consignee reexports an
item using License Exception STA in a transaction that is not
authorized by STA. The commenter recommended that the reexporter not be
liable in such a case.
    Response: BIS believes that the consignee should be able to place
reasonable reliance on the ECCN furnished by its supplier in License
Exception STA transactions. Accordingly, the final rule states that for
purposes of determining reexport or transfer eligibility under STA, the
consignee may rely on the ECCN provided to it by the party required to
furnish the ECCN to the consignee unless the consignee ``knows'' that
the ECCN is in error. The term ``know'' has the same meaning as the
term ``knowledge'' in Sec.  772.1 of the EAR.
    Comments regarding the requirement to obtain consignee statement.
    Comment 25: Several commenters proposed that one consignee
statement be permitted for multiple transactions. Various proposals
were to allow a single statement for a specific project, a specific
contract, a specific time period or for all items to be shipped to that
consignee under STA. One commenter suggested that License Exception STA
as proposed actually allows for a single statement to cover multiple
shipments but clarification is desirable.
    Response: BIS agrees that a single consignee statement should be
able to cover more than one transaction for the reasons provided by
commenters and is revising the final rule to explicitly so state. These
revisions are described more fully under the topic heading ``Final Rule
Revisions to License Exception STA Safeguards'' below.
    Comment 26: One commenter stated that the requirement for a
consignee acknowledgement is in direct opposition to BIS's statement
that the eligible destinations are ``low risk.''
    Another commenter stated that the requirement for reexporters and
transferors to obtain a statement from their consignees would impose a
burden on a particular country's exporters without providing additional
safeguards to U.S. export controls because that country has stringent
export controls based on the same multilateral regimes as the United
States. Several commenters noted that foreign customers are often
reluctant or unwilling to acknowledge U.S. jurisdiction and suggested
that this requirement continues a perception that dealing with U.S.
companies is difficult.
    Response: An important purpose of the consignee statement is to
ensure that the consignee is aware that the item has been shipped under
a license exception that is limited to low risk destinations and agrees
to take steps that will keep the item from leaving those destinations
without authorization. It is integral to the overall purpose of STA,
which is to provide license exception shipments throughout a group of
low risk destinations. Regime membership is a key part of the overall
structure for export controls in an importing country. STA is based, in
part, on that structure but focuses further on actual transactions to
ensure controlled items are properly exported and reexported.
    Comment 27: One commenter suggested that the requirement to obtain
a consignee statement should not be needed for destinations in Sec.
740.20(c)(2) because the eligible items are less sensitive than those
available to destinations listed in Sec.  740.20(c)(1). This commenter
noted that BIS has ample existing means of identifying violations and
enforcing STA restrictions, including post shipment verifications and
placing violators on the Entity List.
    Response: The purpose of the consignee statement is to make sure
that the consignee is aware that the item has been shipped under a
license exception that is limited to low risk destinations. It is
integral to the overall purpose of STA, which is to provide license
exception shipments throughout a group of low risk destinations.
Although the items eligible to Sec.  740.20(c)(2) destinations are less
sensitive than those eligible to Sec.  740.20(c)(1) destinations, the
items are still sufficiently sensitive that obtaining the consignee's
acknowledgement of the limits of STA is necessary to provide reasonable
assurance that the item will not be reexported beyond the low risk
group of authorized destinations.
    Comment 28: This commenter also suggested that if the consignee
statement is retained, three specific provisions are unnecessary.
First, the provision in which the consignee agrees not to export,
reexport or transfer in violation of the EAR is not needed because it
merely duplicates the requirements of the regulations. Second,
consignees in Sec.  740.20(c)(2) destinations should not be required to
acknowledge that items shipped under STA may not subsequently be
shipped under License Exception APR paragraph (a) because that
paragraph does not authorize reexports from any Sec.  740.20(c)(2)
country. Third, the requirement to agree that items shipped under Sec.
740.20(c)(2)(ii) [125 destinations in the proposed rule] may be used
only in a civil end use is unneeded because it repeats a restriction in
part 744 of the EAR and creates an unreasonable burden on all parties
in a chain of transactions who are, in effect, agreeing not to
incorporate the exported item into a United States Munitions List

defense article. This burden is particularly problematic for
manufacturers of materials.
    Response: License exception STA authorizes exports, reexports and
in country transfers in sensitive items that otherwise would require a
license. As such, requiring acknowledgement of the regulations that
apply to the shipment is reasonable.
    This commenter correctly notes that License Exception APR paragraph
(a) does not directly authorize any reexport from a destination listed
in Sec.  740.20(c)(2). However License Exception STA does authorize
reexports from places listed in Sec.  740.20(c)(2) to destinations
listed in Sec.  740.20(c)(1) and License Exception APR paragraph (a)
does authorize reexports from those (c)(1) destinations to other
destinations that are not eligible for STA. For the safeguards of
License Exception STA to function effectively, all reexporters must
notify their consignees of the STA restrictions. The party in a Sec.
740.20(c)(2) location will need to be on notice of the APR paragraph
(a) restriction in order to be able to obtain the needed assurance from
any party in a Sec.  740.20(c)(1) destination to which it reexports.
    Because this final rule removes the civil end use limitation from
Sec.  740.20(c)(2), the requirement to agree to that limitation is not
needed and this final rule removes it from the consignee statement.
    Comments regarding the destination control statement.
    Comment 29: Some commenters objected to the special STA destination
control statement, which under the proposed rule, the exporter,
reexporter, or transferor would need to place on export control
documents that accompany the shipment. The stated reasons for the
objections were that the requirement would be superfluous to other EAR
provisions, the cost and complexity of the requirements would
discourage use of License Exception STA, and that a second destination
control statement is not needed or would not be effective.
    Response: After review of the comments and further consideration,
BIS has concluded that some form of notice to the consignee that the
items it is receiving are subject to STA is needed. However that notice
need not take the form of a destination control statement. Accordingly,
BIS is replacing the destination control statement requirement with the
notice requirement that is described under the heading ``Final Rule
Revisions to License Exception STA Safeguards'' below.
    Final Rule Revisions to License Exception STA Safeguards.
    The proposed requirements to furnish an ECCN, to obtain a consignee
statement and to furnish a destination control statement were intended
to operate in concert to provide assurance against diversions. To
address the points raised by some of the commenters regarding those
proposed requirements while maintaining their concerted nature, BIS is
making the changes described below.
    The final rule adds clarifying language to Sec.  740.20(d)(1) and
(2) stating that the Export Control Classification Number furnished to
the consignee may be used for multiple shipments of the same item by a
given exporter to a given consignee under License Exception STA so long
as the information remains accurate. The final rule also provides that
for purposes of determining reexport or transfer eligibility under STA,
the consignee may rely on the ECCN provided to it by the party required
to furnish the ECCN to the consignee unless the consignee knows that
the ECCN is in error. The term ``know'' has the same meaning as the
term ``knowledge'' in Sec.  772.1 of the EAR.
    The final rule revises Sec.  740.20(d)(2) to provide that one
consignee statement may be used for multiple shipments of the same item
by the same exporter to the same consignee under License Exception STA
provided descriptions of the item(s), ECCN(s) and names of the parties
remain accurate. The final rule also removes the provision calling for
the consignees' agreement that items shipped to certain destinations
will be used only for civil end uses because the final rule does not
impose a civil end use limitation. To facilitate verification of
compliance with the consignee statement requirement, the final rule
requires the exporter, reexporter, and transferor to maintain the
specific consignee statement that is associated with each shipment and
a log or other record that identifies each shipment made under License
Exception STA and identifies the specific consignee statement that is
associated with each shipment.
    The final rule replaces the destination control statement with a
requirement that the exporter, reexporter or transferor, as applicable,
notify the consignee in writing that the shipment is made pursuant to
License Exception STA. The notice must either specify which items are
subject to License Exception STA or state that the entire shipment is
made pursuant to License Exception STA. The notice must clearly
identify the shipment to which it applies. The written notice may be
conveyed by paper documents or by electronic methods such as facsimile
or email.
    BIS believes that with these changes, the STA safeguards provide
appropriate assurances that items shipped under License Exception STA
will remain within the group of low risk destinations without placing
excessive and complex burdens on parties trading items subject to the
EAR.
    Comments regarding the License Exception STA paragraphs.
    Comment 30: The STA paragraphs, which appear in 49 ECCNs in this
final rule, designate those ECCNs or portions thereof as ineligible for
License Exception STA if the destination is listed in Sec.
740.20(c)(2) of the EAR. Those exclusion paragraphs have no effect on
the availability of STA for destinations listed in Sec.  740.20(c)(1)
of the EAR. Some commenters indicated that these exclusion paragraphs
were confusing and would lead readers to conclude erroneously that the
designated ECCNs or the designated portions were ineligible for License
Exception STA for all destinations. In addition, some of the commenters
appear to have misinterpreted the meaning of the STA exclusion
paragraphs in exactly that manner. Commenters offered several
suggestions to address this source of confusion.
    One suggestion was to employ two STA paragraphs in each ECCN on the
Commerce Control List, one paragraph would state whether STA is
eligible for destinations listed in Sec.  740.20(c)(1) and the other
would state whether the License Exception is eligible for destinations
listed in Sec.  740.20(c)(2). Each paragraph would take into account
all of the reasons for control in the ECCN and any other relevant
factors including whether the item is on the Wassenaar Arrangement
Sensitive List.
    Another suggestion was to use some annotation in the STA paragraphs
such as STA 1 for Sec.  740.20(c)(1) and STA 2 for Sec.  740.20(c)(2).
    A third suggestion was to reference the number of destinations that
are excluded by the paragraph.
    A fourth suggestion was to create a matrix that would show the STA
eligibility for each ECCN and destination.
    Response: BIS has decided to adopt the third suggestion in this
final rule. Because the number of destinations listed in Sec.
740.20(c)(2) in the final rule is eight compared to 36 eligible
destinations under Sec.  740.20(c)(1), BIS believes that the best
solution is to modify the STA paragraphs to reference the number of
destinations in addition

to referencing the relevant STA eligibility paragraph, i.e. Sec.
740.20(c)(1) or (c)(2).
    Accordingly, the STA exclusion paragraphs in this final rule have
the format: ``License Exception STA may not be used to ship [list
ineligible items] to any of the eight destinations listed in Sec.
740.20(c)(2).'' The words ``or transmit'' immediately follow the words
``to ship'' in software or technology ECCNs to be consistent with
terminology used elsewhere in the EAR. BIS decided not to introduce STA
paragraphs into every ECCN because ECCNs that include multiple reasons
for control would require lengthy and complex STA paragraphs. This
complexity would be compounded in the case of software and technology
ECCNs in which one ECCN often encompasses not only multiple reasons for
control but also references to multiple commodity ECCNs.
    BIS decided not to adopt separate annotations such as STA1 and STA2
for the two authorizing paragraphs for two reasons. First, to be fully
effective, this suggestion would require that the notations be in every
ECCN, creating the same length and complexity issues noted above.
Second, every License Exception paragraph in the Commerce Control List
is designated by the symbol that is used to report shipments under that
License Exception in the Automated Export System. All shipments under
License Exception STA are to be reported under the symbol STA. Use of
two different designators for a single license exception in the
Commerce Control List could cause public confusion about the procedure
for reporting License Exception STA shipments.
    BIS decided not to attempt to describe STA eligibility in the form
of a matrix because this technique also would produce an unduly complex
document. Such a matrix would have to account for every destination in
the world and every paragraph of every ECCN, making it far larger than
the current Country Chart found at Supp. No. 1 to part 738 of the EAR.
The STA paragraphs apply to only eight destinations and to 49 ECCNs.
BIS believes that revising the STA paragraphs themselves is a more
practical way to reduce the possibility of confusion pointed out by
these commenters.

Specific License Exception Provisions

Scope

    The license exception applies only to Commerce Control List based
license requirements. Transactions in which a license is required
because of an end-use--such as a proliferation end use described in
part 744 of the EAR or a proscribed end user (such as a party on the
Entity List in part 744 of the EAR)--or because the destination is
subject to an embargo or special restrictions in part 746 of the EAR,
are not eligible for License Exception STA. Items on the Commerce
Control List that are subject to the encryption items (EI), short
supply (SS), surreptitious listening (SL), missile technology (MT), or
chemical weapons (CW) reasons for control are not eligible for License
Exception STA because of various requirements imposed by statutes,
treaties or U.S. implementation of international commitments. Items in
ECCNs 0A981, 0A982, 0A983, 0A985 or 0E982 are not eligible. Those ECCNs
apply to equipment designed for the execution of human beings,
specially designed implements of torture, law enforcement restraint
devices, discharge type arms and devices designed to administer
electric shocks and certain related technology. The human rights
concerns associated with those items are sufficiently great to justify
precluding use of License Exception STA.
    Items in ECCNs 1C351.a, .b, .c, .d.5, .d.6 or .e; 1C352; 1C353;
1C354; 1C360; 1E001 (for 1C351.a, .b, .c, .d.5, .d.6 or .e, 1C352,
1C353, 1C354 or 1C360) or in ECCN 1E351 may not be shipped pursuant to
License Exception STA because those ECCNs cover certain pathogens and
toxins that have potential uses in developing chemical or biological
weapons. Commodities in ECCN 1C351.d.1, .2, .3, .4, .7, .8, .9, or .10
are eligible for License Exception STA so long as the exports,
reexports or transfers are limited to no more than 100 milligrams of
any one toxin per shipment and no more than six shipments are sent to
any one end user in any one calendar year.
    License Exception STA may not be used for certain software and
technology in Category 9 of the Commerce Control List as noted below.
    (A) License Exception STA may not be used for 9D001 or 9D002
``software'' that is specially designed or modified for the
``development'' or ``production'' of:
    (1) Components of engines controlled by ECCN 9A001 if such
components incorporate any of the ``technologies'' controlled by
9E003.a.1, 9E003.a.2, 9E003.a.3, 9E003.a.4, 9E003.a.5, 9E003.c, 9E003.i
(other than technology for fan or power turbines), 9E003.h; or
    (2) Equipment controlled by 9B001; or
    (B) License Exception STA may not be used for 9D001 ``software''
that is specially designed or modified for the ``development'' of
``technology'' controlled by 9E003.a.1, 9E003.a.2, 9E003.a.3,
9E003.a.4, 9E003.a.5, 9E003.c, 9E003.i (other than technology for fan
or power turbines) or 9E003.h.
    (C) License Exception STA may not be used for 9D004.f or 9D004.g
``software''.
    (D) License Exception STA may not be used for 9E001 ``technology''
according to the General Technology Note for the ``development'' of
9A001.b engines or components of engines controlled by 9A001.b if such
components incorporate:
    (1) Any of the ``technologies'' controlled by 9E003.a.1, 9E003.a.2,
9E003.a.3, 9E003.a.4, 9E003.a.5, 9E003.c, 9E003.i (other than
technology for fan or power turbines) or 9E003.h;
    (2) Any of the 9D001 or 9D002 software in paragraphs (A) or (B)
above.
    (E) License Exception STA may not be used for 9E002 ``technology''
according to the General Technology Note for the ``production'' of
components of engines controlled by 9A001.b if such components
incorporate any of the ``technologies'' controlled by 9E003.a.1,
9E003.a.2, 9E003.a.3, 9E003.a.4, 9E003.a.5, 9E003.c, 9E003.i (other
than technology for fan or power turbines) or 9E003.h.
    (F) License Exception STA may not be used for ``technology'' in
9E003.a.1, 9E003.a.2, 9E003.a.3, 9E003.a.4, 9E003.a.5, 9E003.c, 9E003.i
(other than technology for fan or power turbines), 9E003.h.
    Authorizations.
    This license exception provides two distinct authorizations. One
authorization allows exports, reexports or in country transfers to
which any (or all) of six reasons for control apply to go to 36
destinations. Another authorization allows less sensitive items where
exports, reexports and in country transfers subject to only national
security reasons for control to go to eight additional destinations.
National security-controlled items that are ineligible for the latter
authorization are identified by the new STA paragraphs in the ``License
Exceptions'' sections of 49 ECCNs on the Commerce Control List. Thus,
the STA exclusion paragraph serves the opposite function of a typical
list-based license exception paragraph. The typical license exception
paragraph in an ECCN identifies items that are eligible for a license
exception rather than those that are ineligible.
    Authorization for Items Controlled for Multiple Reasons to 36
Destinations.
    If the only reason(s) for control that impose(s) a license
requirement on the export, reexport or in country transfer is (are)
national security (NS); chemical or biological weapons (CB); nuclear
nonproliferation (NP); regional stability (RS); crime control (CC); or
significant

items (SI), exports, reexports and transfers (in-country) to 36
destinations as well as releases within a single country of software
source code and technology to nationals of the same 36 destinations are
authorized, unless otherwise excluded from License Exception STA.
    On April 29, 2011, the Under Secretary of Commerce for Industry and
Security, pursuant to the authority delegated to him under section
6(n)(2) of the EAA, designated Argentina, Austria, Finland, Ireland,
South Korea, Sweden, and Switzerland as eligible destinations for
export and re-export of items controlled for crime control (CC), not
including ECCNs 0A981, 0A982, 0A983, 0A985 or 0E982, without a license
under License Exception Strategic Trade Authorization.
    Authorization for Less Sensitive National Security Items to Eight
Additional Destinations.
    If the only reason for control that imposes a license requirement
on the export, reexport or in country transfer is national security
(NS) and the item is not designated in the STA sensitive items
exclusion paragraph in its ECCN, eight destinations (and nationals
thereof) in addition to the 36 noted above are authorized. The STA
exclusion paragraphs closely track the Sensitive List of the Wassenaar
Arrangement. This rule adds such paragraphs to 49 ECCNs.
    Limitations on Subsequent Use of License Exception APR.
    Use of License Exception STA precludes subsequent use of License
Exception APR paragraphs (a) and (b) (Sec.  740.16(a) and (b) of the
EAR) for items shipped pursuant to License Exception STA.
    Conditions That Apply to License Exception STA.
    Section 740.20(d) imposes three conditions on exports, reexports
and transfers and an alternative set of conditions on deemed exports
and deemed reexports made pursuant to License Exception STA.
    (1) Exporters must furnish the consignee with the ECCN that applies
to each item transferred under License Exception STA. Reexporters and
transferors must provide subsequent consignees with the ECCN provided
by the exporter or by prior reexporters or transferors. The ECCN need
be furnished to each consignee only once for each item to be shipped
under License Exception STA. So long as the furnished ECCN remains
accurate, it need not be refurnished for subsequent shipments.
    (2) Exporters, reexporters and transferors must obtain from their
consignees, prior to the shipment, a written statement identifying the
items to be shipped and restating the ECCN(s) provided to the
consignees by the exporters, reexporters or transferors. The exporter,
reexporter and transferor must maintain the consignee's written
statement as well as a log or other written record that identifies each
shipment associated with a particular statement.
    The statement must also acknowledge that the consignee:
     Is aware that items will be shipped pursuant to License
Exception STA;
     Has been informed of the description of the items and
their ECCN(s) by the exporter, reexporter or transferor;
     Understands that shipment pursuant to License Exception
STA precludes subsequent use of paragraphs (a) or (b) of License
Exception APR for the items;
     Agrees not to export, reexport or transfer these items to
any destination, end use or end user prohibited by the EAR; and
     Agrees to produce copies of this document and all other
export, reexport or transfer records (i.e., the documents described in
part 762 of the EAR) relevant to the items referenced in this statement
to the U.S. Government, upon request, as set forth in Sec.  762.7.
    (3) With each shipment under License Exception STA, the exporter
(or reexporter or transferor as applicable) must notify the consignee
in writing that the shipment is made pursuant to License Exception STA.
The notice must either specify which items are subject to License
Exception STA or state that the entire shipment is made pursuant to
License Exception STA. The notice must clearly identify the shipment to
which it refers. The written notice may be conveyed by paper documents
or by electronic methods such as facsimile or email.
    Recognizing that the foregoing requirements are not relevant or
workable with respect to releases within a single country of software
source code or technology to foreign nationals, Sec.  740.20(d) imposes
a different set of requirements on them. The releaser of the technology
or source code must notify the recipient of the technology or source
code of the restrictions on further release. The notification must
either expressly inform the recipient that the EAR impose limits on
further disclosure or must be in the form of an agreement in which the
recipient agrees to limits on further disclosure. Any such agreement
must impose limits that are equivalent to or more restrictive than all
limits on further disclosure that are imposed by the EAR. The
notification must be in writing and a copy of it must be retained by
the releaser and the recipient. The notification may be in a separate
document or included in a document such as a contract or a
nondisclosure agreement. If the document has an expiration date, it
must provide that the restrictions on disclosure do not expire.
    Addition of License Exception STA Paragraphs to 49 ECCNs.
    This rule adds License Exception STA paragraphs to 49 ECCNs. These
paragraphs, which closely track the Wassenaar Arrangement Sensitive
List, designate certain items that are not eligible for License
Exception STA to the eight destinations in Sec.  740.20(c)(2).
Incidental Changes Necessary To Implement License Exception STA
Cross Reference to Wassenaar Arrangement Reporting Requirements
    Section 740.20 cross references the Wassenaar Arrangement reporting
requirements in Sec.  743.1 of the EAR because Wassenaar Arrangement
Sensitive List items exported to Wassenaar Arrangement non-members
pursuant to License Exception STA are subject to the reporting
requirements of Sec.  743.1.
Revisions to Sec.  732.4
    Section 732.4 of the EAR explains how to identify and use license
exceptions. This rule revises that section to note the License
Exception STA exclusion paragraphs in ECCNs and to add License
Exception STA to the list of license exceptions that are subject to the
Wassenaar Arrangement reporting requirements of Sec.  743.1 of the EAR.
Revision to Sec.  738.2(d)(2)(ii) Explaining the Use of the License
Exception STA Exclusion Paragraphs in ECCNs
    Section 738.2 of the EAR explains the workings of the Commerce
Control List, and paragraph (d)(2)(ii) of that section explains the
``License Exception'' paragraph of an ECCN. This rule revises that
paragraph to explain the role of the STA exclusion paragraphs, which is
different from that of the other license exception paragraphs that
appear in ECCNs. The other license exception paragraphs signal
eligibility to use a license exception and the limits of that
eligibility. The STA paragraphs identify items for which the second of
the two authorizing paragraphs of License Exception STA (i.e., Sec.
740.20(c)(2)) may not be used.
Revision to Sec.  743.1 Wassenaar Arrangement Reporting
    Wassenaar Arrangement member states, including the United States,
are required to report to the Wassenaar Arrangement exports of
Wassenaar Arrangement Sensitive List items to non-member states for
which a license was not issued. Section 743.1 of the EAR requires
exporters using certain license exceptions for such exports to report
the export to BIS. The information reported by the exporters is used to
compile a report that the United States submits to the Wassenaar
Arrangement. To enable the United States to meet its reporting
obligations to the Wassenaar Arrangement, this rule adds a reference to
License Exception STA in Sec.  743.1. The reporting requirement in
Sec.  743.1 is based on exports of Wassenaar Arrangement Sensitive List
items to non-Wassenaar member states. The only non-Wassenaar member
state to which License Exception STA authorizes Wassenaar Arrangement
Sensitive List items is Iceland, a country with which the United States
has a relatively small volume of trade. Therefore, BIS believes that
this rule will not have any material impact on volume of reports
required by Sec.  743.1.
Other Incidental Changes
    The restriction on using license exceptions for items controlled
for crime controlled reasons is modified by adding a paragraph to Sec.
740.2 exempting transactions authorized by License Exception STA from
the restriction.
    The prohibition on using License Exception GOV to export or
reexport items controlled for chemical or biological weapons (CB) to
the agencies of cooperating governments (as defined in Sec.
740.11(b)(3)(ii) of the EAR) and certain diplomatic and consular
missions of cooperating governments (as defined in Sec.
740.11(b)(2)(iv) of the EAR) is removed by revisions to paragraphs
(a)(2) and (b)(2) of Supplement No. 1 to Sec.  740.11 for the reasons
noted above.
Rulemaking Requirements
    1. Executive Orders 13563 and 12866 direct agencies to assess all
costs and benefits of available regulatory alternatives and, if
regulation is necessary, to select regulatory approaches that maximize
net benefits (including potential economic, environmental, public
health and safety effects, distribute impacts, and equity). Executive
Order 13563 emphasizes the importance of quantifying both costs and
benefits, of reducing costs, of harmonizing rules, and of promoting
flexibility. This rule has been designated a ``significant regulatory
action,'' although not economically significant, under section 3(f) of
Executive Order 12866. Accordingly, the rule has been reviewed by the
Office of Management and Budget.
    2. Notwithstanding any other provision of law, no person is
required to respond to, nor is subject to a penalty for failure to
comply with, a collection of information, subject to the requirements
of the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 (44 U.S.C. 3501 et seq.) (PRA),
unless that collection of information displays a currently valid Office
of Management and Budget (OMB) Control Number. The rule affects a
collection of information approved by OMB under control number 0607-
0152 (the Automated Export System or AES). That collection is
administered by the Census Bureau. For most exports of items subject to
the EAR, the export license number, a license exception symbol or the
designator NLR (no license required) must be entered into AES. BIS
believes that this rule will have no material impact on the burden
imposed by that collection because this rule merely replaces an
existing requirement to enter the license number with a requirement to
enter a license exception symbol instead. This rule also

amends a collection of information approved by OMB under control number
0694-0137 (License Exemptions and Exclusions). This control number is
being amended to add the requirement for exporters, reexporters and
transferors to furnish ECCNs, to obtain a statement of assurance from
the consignee before shipping pursuant to the license exception and to
notify the consignee of shipments pursuant to the License Exception and
the requirement to maintain records identifying shipments associated
with each statement created by this rule (safeguards requirements). BIS
expects the safeguards requirements are likely to increase the burden
associated with control number 0694-0137 by about 3,387 hours (2,903
instances of complying with transactions subject to the safeguards
requirements @ 1 hour and 10 minutes each). BIS believes that, in most
instances, this new burden will be wholly or partially offset by a
reduction in burden under control number 0694-0088 (Simplified Network
Application Processing System) which authorizes, among other things,
export license applications.
    3. This rule does not contain policies with Federalism implications
as that term is defined under E.O. 13132.
    4. The Chief Counsel for Regulation of the Department of Commerce
has certified to the Chief Counsel for Advocacy of the Small Business
Administration that the proposed rule, if adopted in final form, would
not have a significant economic impact on a substantial number of small
entities. The basis for that certification was published in the
preamble to the proposed rule and is not repeated here. BIS received no
comments regarding the certification. As a result, a final regulatory
flexibility analysis is not required and none has been prepared.
    5. The Department finds that there is good cause to exempt this
rule from the requirement of 5 U.S.C. 553(d) to publish a substantive
rule not less than 30 days before its effective date. This rule creates
an exception to some export license requirements and requires users of
that exception to provide certain information to their consignees and
to obtain certain assurances from their consignees. In doing so, this
rule allows international trade transactions to proceed without the
delay needed to obtain a license. Such delays give international
customers an incentive to purchase foreign made products and reduce the
competiveness of American made products in the marketplace. Moreover,
this rule does not require any person to use the new license exception
that it creates. Any person may continue to use any other license
exceptions that exist or may continue to apply for licenses. Thus no
person is required to alter existing practices as a result of this
rule. Because a delayed effective date would continue a disincentive to
purchase American products and an immediate effective date would not
require a change in existing practices, any delay in implementation
would not be in the public interest.

List of Subjects

15 CFR Parts 732 and 740

    Administrative practice and procedure, Exports, Reporting and
recordkeeping requirements.

15 CFR Part 738

    Exports.

15 CFR Part 743

    Administrative practice and procedure, Reporting and recordkeeping
requirements.

15 CFR Part 774

    Exports, Reporting and recordkeeping requirements.

    Accordingly, the Export Administration Regulations (15 CFR parts
730-774) are amended as follows:

PART 732--[AMENDED]

0
1. The authority citation for part 732 continues to read as follows:

    Authority:  50 U.S.C. app. 2401 et seq.; 50 U.S.C. 1701 et seq.;
E.O. 13026, 61 FR 58767, 3 CFR, 1996 Comp., p. 228; E.O. 13222, 66
FR 44025, 3 CFR, 2001 Comp., p. 783; Notice of August 12, 2010, 75
FR 50681 (August 16, 2010).

0
2. Section 732.4 is amended by:
0
a. Adding two sentences immediately following the existing third
sentence in paragraph (b)(3)(iii); and
0
b. Revising paragraph (b)(3)(iv) to read as follows:

Sec.  732.4  Steps regarding License Exceptions.

* * * * *
    (b) * * *
    (iii) * * * Some ECCNs contain License Exception STA exclusion
paragraphs. Those paragraphs delineate items excluded from the License
Exception STA provisions in Sec.  740.20(c)(2) of the EAR. * * *
    (iv) If you are exporting under License Exceptions GBS, CIV, LVS,
STA, APP, TSR or GOV, you should review Sec.  743.1 of the EAR to
determine the applicability of certain reporting requirements.
* * * * *

PART 738--[AMENDED]

0
3. The authority citation for part 738 continues to read as follows:

    Authority:  50 U.S.C. app. 2401 et seq.; 50 U.S.C. 1701 et seq.;
10 U.S.C. 7420; 10 U.S.C. 7430(e); 22 U.S.C. 287c; 22 U.S.C. 3201 et
seq.; 22 U.S.C. 6004; 30 U.S.C. 185(s), 185(u); 42 U.S.C. 2139a; 42
U.S.C. 6212; 43 U.S.C. 1354; 15 U.S.C. 1824a; 50 U.S.C. app. 5; 22
U.S.C. 7201 et seq.; 22 U.S.C. 7210; E.O. 13026, 61 FR 58767, 3 CFR,
1996 Comp., p. 228; E.O. 13222, 66 FR 44025, 3 CFR, 2001 Comp., p.
783; Notice of August 12, 2010, 75 FR 50681 (August 16, 2010).

0
4. Section 738.2 is amended by adding two sentences immediately
following the existing third sentence in paragraph (d)(2)(ii) to read
as follows:

Sec.  738.2  Commerce Control List structure.

* * * * *
    (d) * * *
    (2) * * *
    (ii) * * * Some ECCNs have License Exception STA exclusion
paragraphs. These paragraphs identify items for which the License
Exception STA provisions in Sec.  740.20(c)(2) of the EAR may not be
used, but do not otherwise affect License Exception STA availability. *
* *
* * * * *

PART 740--[AMENDED]

0
5. The authority citation for part 740 continues to read as follows:

    Authority: 50 U.S.C. app. 2401 et seq.; 50 U.S.C. 1701 et seq.;
22 U.S.C. 7201 et seq.; E.O. 13026, 61 FR 58767, 3 CFR, 1996 Comp.,
p. 228; E.O. 13222, 66 FR 44025, 3 CFR, 2001 Comp., p. 783; Notice
of August 12, 2010, 75 FR 50681 (August 16, 2010).

0
6. Section 740.2 is amended by revising paragraphs (a)(4)(ii) and (iii)
and by adding paragraph (a)(4)(iv) to read as follows:

Sec.  740.2  Restrictions on all License Exceptions.

    (a) * * *
    (4) * * *
    (ii) Authorized by Sec.  740.11(b)(2)(ii) (official use by
personnel and agencies of the U.S. government);
    (iii) Authorized by Sec.  740.14(e) of the EAR (certain shotguns
and shotgun shells for personal use); or
    (iv) Authorized by Sec.  740.20 of the EAR (License Exception STA).
* * * * *

0
7. Supplement No. 1 to Sec.  740.11 is amended by revising paragraphs
(a)(2) and (b)(2) to read as follows:

Sec.  740.11  Governments, international organizations, international
inspections under the Chemical Weapons Convention, and the
International Space Station (GOV).

* * * * *

Supplement No. 1 to Sec.  740.11--Additional Restrictions on Use of
License Exception GOV

    (a) * * *
    (2) Items identified on the Commerce Control List as controlled
for missile technology (MT) or nuclear nonproliferation (NP)
reasons;
* * * * *
    (b) * * *
    (2) Items identified on the Commerce Control List as controlled
for missile technology (MT) or nuclear nonproliferation (NP)
reasons;
* * * * *

0
8. Add Sec.  740.20 to read as follows:

Sec.  740.20  License Exception Strategic Trade Authorization (STA).

    (a) Introduction. This section authorizes exports, reexports and in
country transfers, including releases within a single country of
software source code and technology to foreign nationals in lieu of a
license that would otherwise be required pursuant to part 742 of the
EAR.
    (b) Requirements and Limitations--(1) Requirements for Using
License Exception STA. (i) All of the reasons for control that impose a
part 742 license requirement on the export, reexport or in country
transfer must be addressed in at least one authorizing paragraph of
this section.
    (ii) The party using License Exception STA must comply with all of
the requirements in paragraph (d) of this section.
    (2) Limitations on Use of License Exception STA. The prohibitions
and limits of this paragraph (b)(2) apply notwithstanding the
authorizations in paragraph (c) of this section.
    (i) License Exception STA may not be used in lieu of any license
requirement imposed by ``Part 744--Control Policy: End User and End Use
Based'' or by ``Part 746--Embargoes and Other Special Controls'' of the
EAR.
    (ii) License Exception STA may not be used for any item controlled
under ECCNs 0A981, 0A982, 0A983, 0A985 or 0E982.
    (iii) License Exception STA may not be used for any item that is
controlled for reason of encryption items (EI), short supply (SS),
surreptitious listening (SL), missile technology (MT) or chemical
weapons (CW).
    (iv) License Exception STA may not be used for any item identified
on the CCL as being subject to the exclusive export control
jurisdiction of another agency, such as the Department of State, the
Department of Energy, or the Nuclear Regulatory Commission.
    (v) License Exception STA may not be used for any item controlled
by ECCNs 1C351.a, .b, .c, .d.5, .d.6 or .e; 1C352; 1C353; 1C354; 1C360;
1E001 (for 1C351.a, .b, .c, .d.5, .d.6 or .e, 1C352, 1C353, 1C354 or
1C360) or ECCN 1E351.
    (vi) Toxins controlled by ECCN 1C351.d.1, .2, .3, .4, .7, .8, .9,
and .10 are authorized to destinations in paragraph (c)(1) of this
section under License Exception STA subject to the following limits.
For purposes of this paragraph all ECCN 1C351.d.1, .2, .3, .4, .7, .8,
.9, or .10 toxins sent from one exporter, reexporter or transferor to
one end user on the same day constitute one shipment.
    (A) The maximum amount of any one toxin in any one shipment may not
exceed 100 milligrams.
    (B) No exporter, reexporter or transferor may send more than six
shipments of any one toxin to any one end user in a single calendar
year.
    (vii) Commerce Control List Category 9 limitations on use of
License Exception STA.
    (A) License Exception STA may not be used for 9D001 or 9D002
``software'' that is specially designed or modified for the
``development'' or ``production'' of:
    (1) Components of engines controlled by ECCN 9A001 if such
components incorporate any of the ``technologies'' controlled by
9E003.a.1, 9E003.a.2, 9E003.a.3, 9E003.a.4, 9E003.a.5, 9E003.c, 9E003.i
(other than technology for fan or power turbines), 9E003.h; or
    (2) Equipment controlled by 9B001.
    (B) License Exception STA may not be used for 9D001 ``software''
that is specially designed or modified for the ``development'' of
``technology'' controlled by 9E003.a.1, 9E003.a.2, 9E003.a.3,
9E003.a.4, 9E003.a.5, 9E003.c, 9E003.i (other than technology for fan
or power turbines) or 9E003.h.
    (C) License Exception STA may not be used for 9D004.f or 9D004.g
``software''.
    (D) License Exception STA may not be used for 9E001 ``technology''
according to the General Technology Note for the ``development'' of
9A001.b engines or components of engines controlled by 9A001.b if such
components incorporate:
    (1) Any of the ``technologies'' controlled by 9E003.a.1, 9E003.a.2,
9E003.a.3, 9E003.a.4, 9E003.a.5, 9E003.c, 9E003.i (other than
technology for fan or power turbines) or 9E003.h;
    (2) Any of the 9D001 or 9D002 software in paragraphs
(b)(2)(viii)(A) or (B) of this section.
    (E) License Exception STA may not be used for 9E002 ``technology''
according to the General Technology Note for the ``production'' of
components of engines controlled by 9A001.b if such components
incorporate any of the ``technologies'' controlled by 9E003.a.1,
9E003.a.2, 9E003.a.3, 9E003.a.4, 9E003.a.5, 9E003.c, 9E003.i (other
than technology for fan or power turbines) 9E003.h.
    (F) License Exception STA may not be used for ``technology'' in
9E003.a.1, 9E003.a.2, 9E003.a.3, 9E003.a.4, 9E003.a.5, 9E003.c, 9E003.i
(other than technology for fan or power turbines) 9E003.h.
    (c) Authorizing paragraphs--(1) Multiple reasons for control.
Exports, reexports, and in country transfers in which the only
applicable reason(s) for control is (are) national security (NS);
chemical or biological weapons (CB); nuclear nonproliferation (NP);
regional stability (RS); crime control (CC), and/or significant items
(SI) are authorized for destinations in or nationals of Argentina,
Australia, Austria, Belgium, Bulgaria, Canada, Croatia, Czech Republic,
Denmark, Estonia, Finland, France, Germany, Greece, Hungary, Iceland,
Ireland, Italy, Japan, Latvia, Lithuania, Luxembourg, Netherlands, New
Zealand, Norway, Poland, Portugal, Romania, Slovakia, Slovenia, South
Korea, Spain, Sweden, Switzerland, Turkey, or the United Kingdom.
    (2) Controls of lesser sensitivity. Exports, reexports and in
country transfers in which the only applicable reason for control is
national security (NS) and the item being exported, reexported or
transferred (in country) is not designated in the STA paragraph in the
License Exception section of the ECCN that lists the item are
authorized for destinations in or nationals of Albania, Hong Kong,
India, Israel, Malta, Singapore, South Africa, or Taiwan.
    (d) Conditions--(1) Requirement to furnish Export Control
Classification Number. (i) The exporter must furnish to the consignee
the ECCN of each item to be shipped pursuant to this section. Once
furnished to a particular consignee, the ECCN that applies to any item
need not be refurnished to that consignee at the time the same exporter
makes an additional shipment of the same item, if the information
remains accurate at the time of the additional shipment.
    (ii) A reexporter or transferor must furnish to subsequent
consignees the ECCN, provided by the exporter or a prior reexporter or
transferor, of each item to be shipped pursuant to this

section. Once furnished to a particular consignee, the ECCN that
applies to any item need not be refurnished to that consignee at the
time the same reexporter or transferor makes an additional shipment of
the same item, if the information remains accurate at the time of the
additional shipment.
    (iii) For purposes of determining reexport or transfer eligibility
under this section, the consignee may rely on the ECCN provided to it
by the party required to furnish the ECCN under paragraph (d)(1)(i) or
(ii) of this section unless the consignee knows that the ECCN is
incorrect or has changed. The word ``knows'' has the same meaning as
the term ``knowledge'' in Sec.  772.1 of the EAR.
    (2) Prior Consignee Statement. The exporter, reexporter and
transferor must obtain the following statement in writing from its
consignee prior to shipping the item and must retain the statement in
accordance with part 762 of the EAR. One statement may be used for
multiple shipments of the same items between the same parties so long
as the party names, the description(s) of the item(s) and the ECCNs are
correct. The exporter, reexporter, and transferor must maintain a log
or other record that identifies each shipment made pursuant to this
section and the specific consignee statement that is associated with
each shipment.

[INSERT NAME OF CONSIGNEE]:

    (i) Is aware that [INSERT DESCRIPTION AND APPLICABLE ECCNS OF ITEMS
TO BE SHIPPED] will be shipped pursuant to License Exception Strategic
Trade Authorization (STA) in Sec.  740.20 of the United States Export
Administration Regulations (15 CFR 740.20);
    (ii) Has been informed of the ECCNs noted above by [INSERT NAME OF
EXPORTER, REEXPORTER OR TRANSFEROR];
    (iii) Understands that items shipped pursuant to License Exception
STA may not subsequently be reexported pursuant to paragraphs (a) or
(b) of License Exception APR (15 CFR 740.16(a) or (b));
    (iv) Agrees not to export, reexport or transfer these items to any
destination, use or user prohibited by the United States Export
Administration Regulations; and
    (v) Agrees to provide copies of this document and all other export,
reexport or transfer records (i.e., the documents described in 15 CFR
part 762) relevant to the items referenced in this statement to the
U.S. Government as set forth in 15 CFR 762.7.
    (3) Notification to consignee of STA shipment. With each shipment
under License Exception STA, the exporter (or reexporter or transferor
as applicable), must notify the consignee in writing that the shipment
is made pursuant to License Exception STA. The notice must either
specify which items are subject to License Exception STA or state that
the entire shipment is made pursuant to License Exception STA. The
notice must clearly identify the shipment to which it applies. The
written notice may be conveyed by paper documents or by electronic
methods such as facsimile or email.
    (4) Requirements for releases of software source code or technology
within a single country. Instead of the requirement of paragraphs
(d)(1) through (d)(3) of this section, the party releasing software
source code or technology to a national of a country listed in
paragraph (c)(1) or (c)(2) of this section must notify the recipient of
the software source code or technology of the restrictions upon further
release of the software source code or technology. The notification
must either expressly inform the recipient that the EAR impose limits
on further disclosure or must be in the form of an agreement in which
the recipient agrees to limits on further disclosure. Any such
agreement must impose limits that are equivalent to or more restrictive
than all limits on further disclosure that are imposed by the EAR. The
notification must be in writing and a copy of it must be retained by
the party making the release and the recipient of the release. The
notification may be in a separate document or included in a document
such as a contract or a nondisclosure agreement. If the document has an
expiration date, it must provide that the restrictions on disclosure do
not expire.
    (e) Limitation on subsequent exports, reexports or in country
transfers. If a commodity has been exported, reexported or transferred
in-country pursuant to this section, it may not be subsequently
exported, reexported or transferred in-country pursuant to paragraphs
(a) or (b) of License Exception APR (Sec.  740.16(a) or (b) of the
EAR). Paragraphs (a) and (b) of License Exception APR do not authorize
exports of software or technology.
    (f) Applicability of Wassenaar Arrangement reporting requirements.
See Sec.  743.1 of the EAR for special reporting requirements that
apply to some exports made pursuant to this section.

PART 743--[AMENDED]

0
9. The authority citation for part 743 continues to read as follows:

    Authority:  50 U.S.C. app. 2401 et seq.; 50 U.S.C. 1701 et seq.;
E.O. 13222, 66 FR 44025, 3 CFR, 2001 Comp., p. 783; Notice of August
12, 2010, 75 FR 50681 (August 16, 2010).

0
10. Section 743.1 is amended by adding a paragraph (b)(4) to read as
follows:

Sec.  743.1  Wassenaar Arrangement.

* * * * *
    (b) * * *
    (4) Exports authorized under License Exception STA (See Sec.
740.20 of the EAR).
* * * * *

PART 774--[AMENDED]

0
11. The authority citation for part 774 continues to read as follows:

    Authority:  50 U.S.C. app. 2401 et seq.; 50 U.S.C. 1701 et seq.;
10 U.S.C. 7420; 10 U.S.C. 7430(e); 22 U.S.C. 287c, 22 U.S.C. 3201 et
seq., 22 U.S.C. 6004; 30 U.S.C. 185(s), 185(u); 42 U.S.C. 2139a; 42
U.S.C. 6212; 43 U.S.C. 1354; 15 U.S.C. 1824a; 50 U.S.C. app. 5; 22
U.S.C. 7201 et seq.; 22 U.S.C. 7210; E.O. 13026, 61 FR 58767, 3 CFR,
1996 Comp., p. 228; E.O. 13222, 66 FR 44025, 3 CFR, 2001 Comp., p.
783; Notice of August 12, 2010, 75 FR 50681 (August 16, 2010).

0
12. In Supplement No. 1 to Part 774 (the Commerce Control List),
Category 1, ECCN 1A002 is amended by adding at the end of the License
Exception section, a new License Exception STA paragraph to read as
follows:

Supplement No. 1 to Part 774--The Commerce Control List

* * * * *

1A002 ``Composite'' structures or laminates, having any of the
following (see List of Items Controlled).

* * * * *

License Exceptions

* * * * *
    STA: License Exception STA may not be used to ship any item in
this entry to any of the eight destinations listed in Sec.
740.20(c)(2) of the EAR.
* * * * *
0
13. In Supplement No. 1 to Part 774 (the Commerce Control List),
Category 1, ECCN 1C001 is amended by adding at the end of the License
Exception section, a new License Exception STA paragraph to read as
follows:

1C001 Materials specially designed for use as absorbers of
electromagnetic waves, or intrinsically conductive polymers, as follows
(see List of Items Controlled).

* * * * *

License Exceptions

* * * * *
    STA: License Exception STA may not be used to ship any item in
this entry to any of the eight destinations listed in Sec.
740.20(c)(2) of the EAR.
* * * * *
0
14. In Supplement No. 1 to Part 774 (the Commerce Control List),
Category 1, ECCN 1C007 is amended by adding at the end of the License
Exception section, a new License Exception STA paragraph to read as
follows:

1C007 Ceramic base materials, non- ``composite'' ceramic materials,
ceramic- ``matrix'' ``composite'' materials and precursor materials, as
follows (see List of Items Controlled).

* * * * *

License Exceptions

* * * * *
    STA: License Exception STA may not be used to ship any item in
1C007.c or d to any of the eight destinations listed in Sec.
740.20(c)(2) of the EAR.
* * * * *

0
15. In Supplement No. 1 to Part 774 (the Commerce Control List),
Category 1, ECCN 1C010 is amended by adding at the end of the License
Exception section, a new License Exception STA paragraph to read as
follows:

1C010 ``Fibrous or filamentary materials'' as follows (see List of
Items Controlled).

* * * * *

License Exceptions

* * * * *
    STA: License Exception STA may not be used to ship any item in
1C010.c or d to any of the eight destinations listed in Sec.
740.20(c)(2) of the EAR.
* * * * *

0
16. In Supplement No. 1 to Part 774 (the Commerce Control List),
Category 1, ECCN 1C012 is amended by adding at the end of the License
Exception section, a new License Exception STA paragraph to read as
follows:

1C012 Materials, as follows (see List of Items Controlled).

* * * * *

License Exceptions

* * * * *
    STA: License Exception STA may not be used to ship any item in
this entry to any of the eight destinations listed in Sec.
740.20(c)(2) of the EAR.
* * * * *

0
17. In Supplement No. 1 to Part 774 (the Commerce Control List),
Category 1, ECCN 1D002 is amended by adding at the end of the License
Exception section, a new License Exception STA paragraph to read as
follows:

1D002 ``Software'' for the ``development'' of organic ``matrix'', metal
``matrix'' or carbon ``matrix'' laminates or ``composites''.

* * * * *

License Exceptions

* * * * *
    STA: License Exception STA may not be used to ship or transmit
``software'' for the ``development'' of organic ``matrix'', metal
``matrix'' or carbon ``matrix'' laminates or ``composites''
specified in ECCN 1A002 to any of the eight destinations listed in
Sec.  740.20(c)(2) of the EAR.
* * * * *

0
18. In Supplement No. 1 to Part 774 (the Commerce Control List),
Category 1, ECCN 1E001 is amended by adding at the end of the License
Exception section, a new License Exception STA paragraph to read as
follows:

1E001 ``Technology'' according to the General Technology Note for the
``development'' or ``production'' of items controlled by 1A001.b,
1A001.c, 1A002, 1A003, 1A004, 1A005, 1A006.b, 1A007, 1A008, 1A101, 1B
(except 1B999), or 1C (except 1C355, 1C980 to 1C984, 1C988, 1C990,
1C991, 1C995 to 1C999).

* * * * *

License Exceptions

* * * * *
    STA: License Exception STA may not be used to ship or transmit
``technology'' according to the General Technology Note for the
``development'' or ``production'' of equipment and materials
specified by ECCNs 1A002, 1C001, 1C007.c or d, 1C010.c or d or 1C012
to any of the eight destinations listed in Sec.  740.20(c)(2) of the
EAR.
* * * * *

0
19. In Supplement No. 1 to Part 774 (the Commerce Control List),
Category 1, ECCN 1E002 is amended by adding at the end of the License
Exception section, a new License Exception STA paragraph to read as
follows:

1E002 Other ``technology'' as follows (see List of Items Controlled).

* * * * *

License Exceptions

* * * * *
    STA: License Exception STA may not be used to ship or transmit
any item in 1E002.e or .f to any of the eight destinations listed in
Sec.  740.20(c)(2) of the EAR.
* * * * *

0
20. In Supplement No. 1 to Part 774 (the Commerce Control List),
Category 2, ECCN 2D001 is amended by adding at the end of the License
Exception section, a new License Exception STA paragraph to read as
follows:

2D001 ``Software'', other than that controlled by 2D002, specially
designed or modified for the ``development'', ``production'' or ``use''
of equipment controlled by 2A001 or 2B001 to 2B009.

* * * * *

License Exceptions

* * * * *
    STA: License Exception STA may not be used to ship or transmit
``software'', other than that specified by ECCN 2D002, specially
designed for the ``development'' or ``production'' of equipment as
follows: ECCN 2B001 entire entry; or ``Numerically controlled'' or
manual machine tools as specified in 2B003 to any of the eight
destinations listed in Sec.  740.20(c)(2) of the EAR.
* * * * *

0
21. In Supplement No. 1 to Part 774 (the Commerce Control List),
Category 2, ECCN 2E001 is amended by adding at the end of the License
Exception section, a new License Exception STA paragraph to read as
follows:

2E001 ``Technology'' according to the General Technology Note for the
``development'' of equipment or ``software'' controlled by 2A (except
2A983, 2A984, 2A991, or 2A994), 2B (except 2B991, 2B993, 2B996, 2B997,
or 2B998), or 2D (except 2D983, 2D984, 2D991, 2D992, or 2D994).

* * * * *

License Exceptions

* * * * *
    STA: License Exception STA may not be used to ship or transmit
``technology'' according to the General Technology Note for the
``development'' of ``software'' specified in the License Exception
STA paragraph in the License Exception section of ECCN 2D001 or for
the ``development'' of equipment as follows: ECCN 2B001 entire
entry; or ``Numerically controlled'' or manual machine tools as
specified in 2B003 to any of the eight destinations listed in Sec.
740.20(c)(2) of the EAR.
* * * * *

0
22. In Supplement No. 1 to Part 774 (the Commerce Control List),
Category 2, ECCN 2E002 is amended by adding at the end of the License
Exception section, a new License Exception STA paragraph to read as
follows:

2E002 ``Technology'' according to the General Technology Note for the
``production'' of equipment controlled by 2A (except 2A983, 2A984,
2A991, or 2A994), or 2B (except 2B991, 2B993, 2B996, 2B997, or 2B998).

* * * * *

License Exceptions

* * * * *
    STA: License Exception STA may not be used to ship or transmit
``technology'' according to the General Technology Note for the
``production'' of equipment as follows: ECCN 2B001 entire entry; or
``Numerically controlled'' or manual machine tools as

specified in 2B003 to any of the eight destinations listed in Sec.
740.20(c)(2) of the EAR.
* * * * *

0
23. In Supplement No. 1 to Part 774 (the Commerce Control List),
Category 3, ECCN 3A002 is amended by adding at the end of the License
Exception section, a new License Exception STA paragraph to read as
follows:

3A002 General purpose electronic equipment and accessories therefor, as
follows (see List of Items Controlled).

* * * * *

License Exceptions

* * * * *
    STA: License Exception STA may not be used to ship any item in
3A002.g.1 to any of the eight destinations listed in Sec.
740.20(c)(2) of the EAR.
* * * * *

0
24. In Supplement No. 1 to Part 774 (the Commerce Control List),
Category 3, ECCN 3B001 is amended by adding at the end of the License
Exception section, a new License Exception STA paragraph to read as
follows:

3B001 Equipment for the manufacturing of semiconductor devices or
materials, as follows (see List of Items Controlled) and specially
designed components and accessories therefor.

* * * * *

License Exceptions

* * * * *
    STA: License Exception STA may not be used to ship any item in
3B001.a.2 to any of the eight destinations listed in Sec.
740.20(c)(2) of the EAR.
* * * * *

0
25. In Supplement No. 1 to Part 774 (the Commerce Control List),
Category 3, ECCN 3D001 is amended by adding at the end of the License
Exception section, a new License Exception STA paragraph to read as
follows:

3D001 ``Software'' specially designed for the ``development'' or
``production'' of equipment controlled by 3A001.b to 3A002.g or 3B
(except 3B991 and 3B992).

* * * * *

License Exceptions

* * * * *
    STA: License Exception STA may not be used to ship or transmit
``software'' specially designed for the ``development'' or
``production'' of equipment specified by 3A002.g.1 or 3B001.a.2 to
any of the eight destinations listed in Sec.  740.20(c)(2) of the
EAR.
* * * * *

0
26. In Supplement No. 1 to Part 774 (the Commerce Control List),
Category 3, ECCN 3E001 is amended by adding at the end of the License
Exception section, a new License Exception STA paragraph to read as
follows:

3E001 ``Technology'' according to the General Technology Note for the
``development'' or ``production'' of equipment or materials controlled
by 3A (except 3A292, 3A980, 3A981, 3A991 3A992, or 3A999), 3B (except
3B991 or 3B992) or 3C (except 3C992).

* * * * *

License Exceptions

* * * * *
    STA: License Exception STA may not be used to ship or transmit
``technology'' according to the General Technology Note for the
``development'' or ``production'' of equipment specified by ECCNs
3A002.g.1 or 3B001.a.2 to any of the eight destinations listed in
Sec.  740.20(c)(2) of the EAR.
* * * * *

0
27. In Supplement No. 1 to Part 774 (the Commerce Control List),
Category 4, ECCN 4A001 is amended by adding at the end of the License
Exception section, a new License Exception STA paragraph to read as
follows:

4A001 Electronic computers and related equipment, having any of the
following (see List of Items Controlled), and ``electronic assemblies''
and specially designed components therefor.

* * * * *

License Exceptions

* * * * *
    STA: License Exception STA may not be used to ship any commodity
in 4A001.a.2 to any of the eight destinations listed in Sec.
740.20(c)(2) of the EAR.
* * * * *

0
28. In Supplement No. 1 to Part 774 (the Commerce Control List),
Category 4, ECCN 4D001 is amended by adding at the end of the License
Exception section, a new License Exception STA paragraph to read as
follows:

4D001 ``Software'' as follows (see List of Items Controlled).

* * * * *

License Exceptions

* * * * *
    STA: License Exception STA may not be used to ship or transmit
``software'' specially designed for the ``development'' or
``production'' of equipment specified by ECCN 4A001.a.2 or for the
``development'' or ``production'' of ``digital computers'' having an
`Adjusted Peak Performance' (`APP') exceeding 0.5 Weighted TeraFLOPS
(WT) to any of the eight destinations listed in Sec.  740.20(c)(2)
of the EAR.
* * * * *

0
29. In Supplement No. 1 to Part 774 (the Commerce Control List),
Category 4, ECCN 4E001 is amended by adding at the end of the License
Exception section, a new License Exception STA paragraph to read as
follows:

4E001 ``Technology'' as follows (see List of Items Controlled).

* * * * *

License Exceptions

* * * * *
    STA: License Exception STA may not be used to ship or transmit
``technology'' according to the General Technology Note for the
``development'' or ``production'' of any of the following equipment
or ``software'': a. Equipment specified by ECCN 4A001.a.2; b.
``Digital computers'' having an `Adjusted Peak Performance' (`APP')
exceeding 0.5 Weighted TeraFLOPS (WT); or c. ``software'' specified
in the License Exception STA paragraph found in the License
Exception section of ECCN 4D001 to any of the eight destinations
listed in Sec.  740.20(c)(2) of the EAR.

0
30. In Supplement No. 1 to Part 774 (the Commerce Control List),
Category 5, Part 1, ECCN 5A001 is amended by adding at the end of the
License Exception section, a new License Exception STA paragraph to
read as follows:

5A001 Telecommunications systems, equipment, components and
accessories, as follows (see List of Items Controlled).

* * * * *

License Exceptions

* * * * *
    STA: License Exception STA may not be used to ship any commodity
in 5A001.b.3, .b.5 or .h to any of the eight destinations listed in
Sec.  740.20(c)(2) of the EAR.
* * * * *

0
31. In Supplement No. 1 to Part 774 (the Commerce Control List),
Category 5, Part 1, ECCN 5B001 is amended by adding at the end of the
License Exception section, a new License Exception STA paragraph to
read as follows:

5B001 Telecommunication test, inspection and production equipment,
components and accessories, as follows (See List of Items Controlled).

* * * * *

License Exceptions

* * * * *
    STA: License Exception STA may not be used to ship 5B001.a
equipment and specially designed components or accessories therefor,
specially designed for the ``development'', ``production'' or
``use'' of equipment, functions or features specified by in ECCN
5A001.b.3, .b.5 or .h to any of the eight destinations listed in
Sec.  740.20(c)(2) of the EAR.
* * * * *

0
32. In Supplement No. 1 to Part 774 (the Commerce Control List),
Category 5, Part 1, ECCN 5D001 is amended by adding at the end of the
License Exception section, a new License Exception STA paragraph to
read as follows:

5D001 ``Software'' as follows (see List of Items Controlled).

* * * * *

License Exceptions

* * * * *
    STA: License Exception STA may not be used to ship or transmit
5D001.a ``software'' specially designed for the ``development'' or
``production'' of equipment, functions or features, specified by
ECCN 5A001.b.3, .b.5 or .h; and for 5D001.b. for ``software''
specially designed or modified to support ``technology'' specified
by the STA paragraph in the License Exception section of ECCN 5E001
to any of the eight destinations listed in Sec.  740.20(c)(2) of the
EAR.
* * * * *

0
33. In Supplement No. 1 to Part 774 (the Commerce Control List),
Category 5, Part 1, ECCN 5E001 is amended by adding at the end of the
License Exception section, a new License Exception STA paragraph to
read as follows:

5E001 ``Technology'' as follows (see List of Items Controlled).

* * * * *

License Exceptions

* * * * *
    STA: License Exception STA may not be used to ship or transmit
``technology'' according to the General Technology Note for the
``development'' or ``production'' of equipment, functions or
features specified by 5A001.b.3, .b.5 or .h; or for ``software'' in
5D001.a that is specified in the STA paragraph in the License
Exception section of ECCN 5D001 to any of the eight destinations
listed in Sec.  740.20(c)(2) of the EAR.
* * * * *

0
34. In Supplement No. 1 to Part 774 (the Commerce Control List),
Category 6, ECCN 6A001 is amended by adding at the end of the License
Exception section, a new License Exception STA paragraph to read as
follows:

6A001 Acoustic systems, equipment and components, as follows (see List
of Items Controlled).

* * * * *

License Exceptions

* * * * *
    STA: License Exception STA may not be used to ship commodities
in 6A001.a.1.b, 6A001.a.1.e or 6A001.a.2 (except .a.2.a.4) to any of
the eight destinations listed in Sec.  740.20(c)(2) of the EAR.
* * * * *

0
35. In Supplement No. 1 to Part 774 (the Commerce Control List),
Category 6, ECCN 6A002 is amended by revising the ECCN heading and by
adding at the end of the License Exception section, a new License
Exception STA paragraph to read as follows:

6A002 Optical sensors or equipment and components therefore, as follows
(see List of Items Controlled).

* * * * *

License Exceptions

* * * * *
    STA: License Exception STA may not be used to ship any commodity
in: 6A002.a.1.a, b. or c; or 6A002.a.2.a in which the photocathode
in described in 6A002.a.2.a 3.a is a Multialkali photocathode (e.g.,
S-20 and S-25) having a luminous sensitivity exceeding 700 [micro]A/
lm; or
    6A002.a.3; or
    6A002.b; or
    6A002.c ``Direct view'' imaging equipment incorporating any of
the following:
    1. Image intensifier tubes having the characteristics listed in
the description of 6A002.a.2.a earlier in this STA paragraph of
License Exception section to this ECCN; or
    2. ``Focal plane arrays'' having the characteristics listed in
the description of 6A002.a.3; or 6A002.e to any of the eight
destinations listed in Sec.  740.20(c)(2) of the EAR
* * * * *

0
36. In Supplement No. 1 to Part 774 (the Commerce Control List),
Category 6, ECCN 6A003 is amended by adding at the end of the License
Exception section, a new License Exception STA paragraph to read as
follows:

6A003 Cameras.

* * * * *

License Exceptions

* * * * *
    STA: License Exception STA may not be used to ship any commodity
in 6A003.b.3 or b.4 to any of the eight destinations listed in Sec.
740.20(c)(2) of the EAR.
* * * * *

0
37. In Supplement No. 1 to Part 774 (the Commerce Control List),
Category 6, ECCN 6A004 is amended by adding at the end of the License
Exception section, a new License Exception STA paragraph to read as
follows:

6A004 Optical equipment and components, as follows (see List of Items
Controlled).

* * * * *

License Exceptions

* * * * *
    STA: Paragraph (c)(2) of License Exception STA may not be used
to ship any commodity in 6A004.c or .d to any of the eight
destinations in Sec.  740.20(c)(2) of the EAR.
* * * * *

0
38. In Supplement No. 1 to Part 774 (the Commerce Control List),
Category 6, ECCN 6A006 is amended by adding at the end of the License
Exception section, a new License Exception STA paragraph to read as
follows:

6A006 ``Magnetometers'', ``magnetic gradiometers'', ``intrinsic
magnetic gradiometers'', underwater electric field sensors,
``compensation systems'', and specially designed components therefor,
as follows (see List of Items Controlled).

* * * * *

License Exceptions

* * * * *
    STA: License Exception STA may not be used to ship any commodity
in:
    6A006.a.1; or
    6A006.a.2; or
    6A006.c.1 ``Magnetic gradiometers'' using multiple
``magnetometers'' specified by 6A006.a.1 or 6.A006.a.2; or 6A006.d
or .e (only for underwater receivers incorporating magnetometers
specified in 6A006.a.1 or 6A006.a.2) to any of the eight
destinations listed in Sec.  740.20(c)(2) of the EAR
* * * * *

0
39. In Supplement No. 1 to Part 774 (the Commerce Control List),
Category 6, ECCN 6A008 is amended by adding at the end of the License
Exception section, a new License Exception STA paragraph to read as
follows:

6A008 Radar systems, equipment and assemblies, having any of the
following (see List of Items Controlled), and specially designed
components therefor.

* * * * *

License Exceptions

* * * * *
    STA: License Exception STA may not be used to ship any commodity
in 6A008.d, 6A008.h or 6A008.k to any of the eight destinations
listed in Sec.  740.20(c)(2) of the EAR.
* * * * *

0
40. In Supplement No. 1 to Part 774 (the Commerce Control List),
Category 6, ECCN 6B008 is amended by adding at the end of the License
Exception section, a new License Exception STA paragraph to read as
follows:

6B008 Pulse radar cross-section measurement systems having transmit
pulse widths of 100 ns or less, and specially designed components
therefor.

* * * * *

License Exceptions

* * * * *
    STA: License Exception STA may not be used to ship any commodity
in this entry to any of the eight destinations listed in Sec.
740.20(c)(2) of the EAR.
* * * * *

0
41. In Supplement No. 1 to Part 774 (the Commerce Control List),
Category 6, ECCN 6D001 is amended by adding at the end of the License
Exception section, a new License Exception STA paragraph to read as
follows:

6D001 ``Software'' specially designed for the ``development'' or
``production'' of equipment controlled by 6A004, 6A005, 6A008 or 6B008.

* * * * *

License Exceptions

* * * * *
    STA: License Exception STA may not be used to ship or transmit
``software'' specially designed for the ``development'' or
``production'' of equipment specified by ECCNs 6A004.c, 6A004.d,
6A008.d, 6A008.h, 6A008.k, or 6B008 to any of the eight destinations
listed in Sec.  740.20(c)(2) of the EAR
* * * * *

0
42. In Supplement No. 1 to Part 774 (the Commerce Control List),
Category 6, ECCN 6D003 is amended by adding at the end of the License
Exception section, a new License Exception STA paragraph to read as
follows:

6D003 Other ``software'' as follows (see List of Items Controlled).

* * * * *

License Exceptions

* * * * *
    STA: License Exception STA may not be used to ship transmit
software in 6D003.a to any of the eight destinations listed in Sec.
740.20(c)(2) of the EAR.
* * * * *

0
43. In Supplement No. 1 to Part 774 (the Commerce Control List),
Category 6, ECCN 6E001 is amended by adding at the end of the License
Exception section, a new License Exception STA paragraph to read as
follows:

6E001 ``Technology'' according to the General Technology Note for the
``development'' of equipment, materials or ``software'' controlled by
6A (except 6A991, 6A992, 6A994, 6A995, 6A996, 6A997, or 6A998), 6B
(except 6B995), 6C (except 6C992 or 6C994), or 6D (except 6D991, 6D992,
or 6D993).

* * * * *

License Exceptions

* * * * *
    STA: License Exception STA may not be used to ship or transmit
any technology in this entry to any of the eight destinations listed
in Sec.  740.20(c)(2) of the EAR.
* * * * *

0
44. In Supplement No. 1 to Part 774 (the Commerce Control List),
Category 6, ECCN 6E002 is amended by adding at the end of the License
Exception section, a new License Exception STA paragraph to read as
follows:

6E002 ``Technology'' according to the General Technology Note for the
``production'' of equipment or materials controlled by 6A (except
6A991, 6A992, 6A994, 6A995, 6A996, 6A997 or 6A998), 6B (except 6B995)
or 6C (except 6C992 or 6C994).

* * * * *

License Exceptions

* * * * *
    STA: License Exception STA may not be used to ship or transmit
``technology'' according to the General Technology Note for the
``production'' of equipment specified in the STA exclusion
paragraphs found in the License Exception sections of by ECCNs
6A001, 6A002, 6A003, 6A004, 6A006, 6A008, or 6B008 to any of the
eight destinations listed in Sec.  740.20(c)(2) of the EAR.
* * * * *

0
45. In Supplement No. 1 to Part 774 (the Commerce Control List),
Category 7, ECCN 7D003 is amended by adding at the end of the License
Exception section, a new License Exception STA paragraph to read as
follows:

7D003 Other ``software'' as follows (see List of Items Controlled).

* * * * *

License Exceptions

* * * * *
    STA: License Exception STA may not be used to ship or transmit
software in 7D003.a, b, c, d.1 to d.4 or d.7 to any of the eight
destinations listed in Sec.  740.20(c)(2) of the EAR.
* * * * *

0
46. In Supplement No. 1 to Part 774 (the Commerce Control List),
Category 7, ECCN 7E001 is amended by:
0
a. Revising the MT paragraph in the License Requirements section; and
0
b. Adding at the end of the License Exception section, a new License
Exception STA paragraph to read as follows:

7E001 ``Technology'' according to the General Technology Note for the
``development'' of equipment or ``software'', controlled by 7A (except
7A994), 7B (except 7B994) or 7D (except 7D994).

License Requirements

* * * * *

------------------------------------------------------------------------
                 Controls                           Country chart
------------------------------------------------------------------------

                              * * * * * * *
MT applies to technology for equipment      MT Column 1.
 controlled for MT reasons. MT does not
 apply to ``technology'' for equipment
 controlled by 7A008. MT does apply to
 ``technology'' for equipment specified in
 7A001, 7A002 or 7A003.d that meets or
 exceeds parameters of 7A101, 7A102 or
 7A103.

                              * * * * * * *
------------------------------------------------------------------------

License Exceptions

* * * * *
    STA: License Exception STA may not be used to ship or transmit
any technology in this entry to any of the eight destinations listed
in Sec.  740.20(c)(2) of the EAR.
* * * * *

0
47. In Supplement No. 1 to Part 774 (the Commerce Control List),
Category 7, ECCN 7E002 is amended by:
0
a. Revising the MT paragraph in the License Requirements section; and
0
b. Adding at the end of the License Exception section, a new License
Exception STA paragraph to read as follows:

7E002 ``Technology'' according to the General Technology Note for the
``production'' of equipment controlled by 7A (except 7A994) or 7B
(except 7B994).

License Requirements

* * * * *

------------------------------------------------------------------------
                 Controls                           Country chart
------------------------------------------------------------------------

                              * * * * * * *
MT applies to technology for equipment      MT Column 1.
 controlled for MT reasons. MT does not
 apply to ``technology'' for equipment
 controlled by 7A008. MT does apply to
 ``technology'' for equipment specified in
 7A001, 7A002 or 7A003.d that meets or
 exceeds parameters of 7A101, 7A102 or
 7A103.

                              * * * * * * *
------------------------------------------------------------------------

License Exceptions

* * * * *
    STA: License Exception STA may not be used to ship or transmit
any technology in this entry to any of the eight destinations listed
in Sec.  740.20(c)(2) of the EAR.
* * * * *

0
48. In Supplement No. 1 to Part 774 (the Commerce Control List),
Category 8, ECCN 8A001 is amended by adding at the end of the License
Exception section, a new License Exception STA paragraph to read as
follows:

8A001 Submersible vehicles and surface vessels, as follows (see List of
Items Controlled).

* * * * *

License Exceptions

* * * * *
    STA: License Exception STA may not be used to ship any commodity
in 8A001.b, 8A001.c or 8A001.d to any of the eight destinations
listed in Sec.  740.20(c)(2) of the EAR.
* * * * *

0
49. In Supplement No. 1 to Part 774 (the Commerce Control List),
Category 8, ECCN 8A002 is amended by adding at the end of the License
Exception section, a new License Exception STA paragraph to read as
follows:

8A002 Marine systems, equipment and components, as follows (see List of
Items Controlled).

* * * * *

License Exceptions

* * * * *
    STA: License Exception STA may not be used to ship any commodity
in 8A002.b, h, j, o.3, or p to any of the eight destinations listed
in Sec.  740.20(c)(2) of the EAR.
* * * * *

0
50. In Supplement No. 1 to Part 774 (the Commerce Control List),
Category 8, ECCN 8D001 is amended by adding at the end of the License
Exception section, a new License Exception STA paragraph to read as
follows:

8D001 ``Software'' specially designed or modified for the
``development'', ``production'' or ``use'' of equipment or materials,
controlled by 8A (except 8A018 or 8A992), 8B or 8C.

* * * * *

License Exceptions

* * * * *
    STA: License Exception STA may not be used to ship or transmit
``software'' specially designed for the ``development'' or
``production'' of equipment in 8A001.b, 8A001.c, 8A001.d, 8A002.b,
8A002.h, 8A002.j, 8A002.o.3 or 8A002.p to any of the eight
destinations listed in Sec.  740.20(c)(2) of the EAR.
* * * * *
0
51. In Supplement No. 1 to Part 774 (the Commerce Control List),
Category 8, ECCN 8D002 is amended by adding at the end of the License
Exception section, a new License Exception STA paragraph to read as
follows:

8D002 Specific ``software'' specially designed or modified for the
``development'', ``production'', repair, overhaul or refurbishing (re-
machining) of propellers specially designed for underwater noise
reduction.

* * * * *

License Exceptions

* * * * *
    STA: License Exception STA may not be used to ship or transmit
any software in this entry to any of the eight destinations listed
in Sec.  740.20(c)(2) of the EAR.
* * * * *
0
52. In Supplement No. 1 to Part 774 (the Commerce Control List),
Category 8, ECCN 8E001 is amended by adding at the end of the License