                          EPA/HQ Summary of Meeting                                  Cardinal Health

Attendees

Cardinal Health Participants: Mike Anderson, Dave Barr, Patricia Buchanan, Jim Cline, Andrea Fenstermacher, Kay Gagliardi, Kathy Holen, Steve Kostic,  NJ DEP Participants:

EPA/HQ Participants:

Jeff Salabritas, Amy Scaffidi

Jessica Young, Kathy Lett, Jim O'Leary, Drew Lausch, Kristin Fitzgerald, Josh Smeraldi, Ricardo Jones

Date:  December 1, 2015

Location:  Swedesboro, NJ

Summary

EPA HQ representatives met with representatives from Cardinal health, along with representatives from the New Jersey Department of Environmental Protection (DEP), to discuss the role of wholesale distributors of both prescription and over-the counter (OTC) pharmaceuticals along with the challenges that arise from complying with RCRA regulations when dealing with returned consumer goods. Cardinal health is a wholesaler of pharmaceuticals, providing pharmaceuticals to pharmacies, hospitals, and retail through its chain of 26 nation-wide distribution facilities.  The participants discussed the role of wholesalers in pharmaceutical distribution, along with how returns, credit, and reverse distribution are managed. Cardinal Health also provided participants with a tour of the facility, explaining how hazardous pharmaceuticals are managed.         Cardinal health plans to contribute to comments submitted to the docket for the Hazardous Waste Pharmaceuticals Proposed Rule.


[Federal Register Volume 75, Number 214 (Friday, November 5, 2010)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Pages 68185-68189]
[FR Doc No: 2010-27615]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION

Federal Aviation Administration

14 CFR Part 39

[Docket No. FAA-2010-0640; Directorate Identifier 2009-NM-142-AD;
Amendment 39-16494; AD 2010-23-05]
RIN 2120-AA64

Airworthiness Directives; EADS CASA (Type Certificate Previously
Held by Construcciones Aeronauticas, S.A.) Model CN-235, CN-235-100,
CN-235-200, and CN-235-300 Airplanes, and Model C-295 Airplanes

AGENCY: Federal Aviation Administration (FAA), Department of
Transportation (DOT).

ACTION: Final rule.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: We are superseding an existing airworthiness directive (AD)
for the products listed above. This AD results from mandatory
continuing airworthiness information (MCAI) originated by an aviation
authority of another country to identify and correct an unsafe
condition on an aviation product. The MCAI describes the unsafe
condition as:

    Prompted by [an] accident * * *the FAA published SFAR 88
(Special Federal Aviation Regulation 88) * * *.
* * * * *
    Fuel Airworthiness Limitations arising from the required systems
safety analysis are items that have been shown to have failure
mode(s) associated with an `unsafe condition' * * *. These are
identified in Failure Conditions for which an unacceptable
probability of ignition risk could exist if specific tasks and/or
practices are not performed in accordance with the corrective
actions(s) developed by the TC [type certificate] holder.

We are issuing this AD to require actions to correct the unsafe
condition on these products.

DATES: This AD becomes effective December 10, 2010.
    The Director of the Federal Register approved the incorporation by
reference of certain publications listed in this AD as of December 10,
2010.

ADDRESSES: You may examine the AD docket on the Internet at http://www.regulations.gov or in person at the U.S. Department of
Transportation, Docket Operations, M-30, West Building Ground Floor,
Room W12-140, 1200 New Jersey Avenue, SE., Washington, DC.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Shahram Daneshmandi, Aerospace
Engineer, International Branch, ANM-116, Transport Airplane
Directorate, FAA, 1601 Lind Avenue, SW., Renton, Washington 98057-3356;
telephone<PHONE_NUMBER>; fax<PHONE_NUMBER>.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

Discussion

    We issued a notice of proposed rulemaking (NPRM) to amend 14 CFR
part 39 to include an AD that would apply to the specified products.
That NPRM was published in the Federal Register on June 29, 2010 (75 FR
37339), and proposed to supersede AD 2008-09-22, Amendment 39-15503 (73
FR 23939, May 1, 2008). That NPRM proposed to correct an unsafe
condition for the specified products. The MCAI states:

    Prompted by [an] accident * * *, the FAA published SFAR 88
(Special Federal Aviation Regulation 88). Subsequently, the Joint
Aviation Authorities (JAA) recommended the application of a similar
regulation to the National Aviation Authorities (NAA) of its member
countries. Under this regulation, all holders of type certificates
for passenger transport aeroplanes with either a passenger capacity
of 30 or more, or a payload capacity of 3 402 kg (7 500 lbs) or
more, which have received their certification since 01 January 1958,
are required to conduct a design review against explosion risks.
    In August 2005, EASA published a policy statement on the process
for developing instructions for maintenance and inspection of Fuel
Tank System ignition source prevention (EASA D 2005/CPRO), that also
included the EASA expectations with regard to compliance times of
the corrective actions on the unsafe and the not unsafe part of the
harmonised design review results.
    Fuel Airworthiness Limitations arising from the required systems
safety analysis are items that have been shown to have failure
mode(s) associated with an `unsafe condition' as defined in the FAA
memo 2003-112-15 `SFAR 88--Mandatory Action Decision Criteria'.
These are identified in Failure Conditions for which an unacceptable
probability of ignition risk could exist if specific tasks and/or
practices are not performed in accordance with the corrective
action(s) developed by the TC [type certificate] holder.
    To address these potential unsafe conditions, EASA issued AD
2007-0007, mandating the Fuel System Airworthiness Limitations,
comprising maintenance and inspection tasks and Critical Design
Configuration Control Limitations (CDCCL) that were, at that moment,
defined in issue C of EADS-CASA document DT-0-C00-05001. That
document has now been revised and updated to issue D.
    For the reasons described above, this EASA AD retains the
requirements of AD 2007-0007, which is superseded [and corresponds
to FAA AD 2008-09-22], and requires the implementation of the
revised Fuel Airworthiness Limitations contained in issue D of EADS-
CASA document DT-0-C00-05001 and accomplishment of related
modifications.

The required actions are retaining the limitations for fuel tank
systems, adding thermal insulation to the air condition compression
system, applying double bonding connection on fuel tubes, and modifying
the separation between the center wing electrical harness and fuel
tubes. The application of double bonding connections on fuel tubes
includes doing general visual inspections for damage of the inside of
the fuel tanks, and corrective actions if necessary. The corrective
actions include contacting EADS CASA for repair instructions and doing
the repair. You may obtain further information by examining the MCAI in
the AD docket.
    You may obtain further information by examining the MCAI in the AD
docket.

Comments

    We gave the public the opportunity to participate in developing
this AD. We received no comments on the NPRM or on the determination of
the cost to the public.

Corrections to Table 1 of This AD

    In the NPRM, the reference to Eaton Component Maintenance Manual
(CMM) with Illustrated Parts List 28-10-63, Revision 003, dated June
20, 2006, was incorrectly published as Eaton CMM with Illustrated Parts
List 28-0-63. This final rule refers to Eaton CMM with Illustrated
Parts List 28-10-63.
    We have changed Table 1 of this AD to fix a typographical error,
which is specified in EADS CASA CMM with Illustrated Parts List 28-21-
12, Revision 003, dated June 15, 2007. The title page of that document
specifies ``Revision 002.'' The correct revision level is ``Revision
003.''

Conclusion

    We reviewed the available data and determined that air safety and
the public interest require adopting the AD with the changes described
previously. We determined that these changes will not increase the
economic burden on any operator or increase the scope of the AD.

Differences Between This AD and the MCAI or Service Information

    We have reviewed the MCAI and related service information and, in
general, agree with their substance. But we might have found it
necessary to use different words from those in the MCAI to ensure the
AD is clear for U.S. operators and is enforceable. In making these
changes, we do not intend to differ substantively from the information
provided in the MCAI and related service information.
    We might also have required different actions in this AD from those
in the MCAI in order to follow our FAA policies. Any such differences
are highlighted in a NOTE within the AD.

Costs of Compliance

    We estimate that this AD will affect about 8 products of U.S.
registry.
    The actions that are required by AD 2008-09-22 and retained in this
AD take about 1 work-hour per product, at an average labor rate of $85
per work-hour. Based on these figures, the estimated cost of the
currently required actions is $85 per product.
    We estimate that it will take about 90 work-hours per product to
comply with the new basic requirements of this AD. The average labor
rate is $85 per work-hour. Based on these figures, we estimate the cost
of this AD to the U.S. operators to be $61,200, or $7,650 per product,
depending on airplane configuration.

Authority for This Rulemaking

    Title 49 of the United States Code specifies the FAA's authority to
issue rules on aviation safety. Subtitle I, section 106, describes the
authority of the FAA Administrator. ``Subtitle VII: Aviation
Programs,'' describes in more detail the scope of the Agency's
authority.
    We are issuing this rulemaking under the authority described in
``Subtitle VII, Part A, Subpart III, Section 44701: General
requirements.'' Under that section, Congress charges the FAA with
promoting safe flight of civil aircraft in air commerce by prescribing
regulations for practices, methods, and procedures the Administrator
finds necessary for safety in air commerce. This regulation is within
the scope of that authority because it addresses an unsafe condition
that is likely to exist or develop on products identified in this
rulemaking action.

Regulatory Findings

    We determined that this AD will not have federalism implications
under Executive Order 13132. This AD will not have a substantial direct
effect on the States, on the relationship between the national
government and the States, or on the distribution of power and
responsibilities among the various levels of government.
    For the reasons discussed above, I certify this AD:

    1. Is not a ``significant regulatory action'' under Executive Order
12866;
    2. Is not a ``significant rule'' under the DOT Regulatory Policies
and Procedures (44 FR 11034, February 26, 1979); and
    3. Will not have a significant economic impact, positive or
negative, on a substantial number of small entities under the criteria
of the Regulatory Flexibility Act.
    We prepared a regulatory evaluation of the estimated costs to
comply with this AD and placed it in the AD docket.

Examining the AD Docket

    You may examine the AD docket on the Internet at http://www.regulations.gov; or in person at the Docket Operations office
between 9 a.m. and 5 p.m., Monday through Friday, except Federal
holidays. The AD docket contains the NPRM, the regulatory evaluation,
any comments received, and other information. The street address for
the Docket Operations office (telephone<PHONE_NUMBER>) is in the
ADDRESSES section. Comments will be available in the AD docket shortly
after receipt.

List of Subjects in 14 CFR Part 39

    Air transportation, Aircraft, Aviation safety, Incorporation by
reference, Safety.

Adoption of the Amendment

0
Accordingly, under the authority delegated to me by the Administrator,
the FAA amends 14 CFR part 39 as follows:

PART 39--AIRWORTHINESS DIRECTIVES

0
1. The authority citation for part 39 continues to read as follows:

    Authority: 49 U.S.C. 106(g), 40113, 44701.

Sec.  39.13  [Amended]

0
2. The FAA amends Sec.  39.13 by removing Amendment 39-15503 (73 FR
23939, May 1, 2008) and adding the following new AD:

2010-23-05 EADS CASA (Type Certificate Previously Held by
Construcciones Aeronauticas, S.A.): Amendment 39-16494. Docket No.
FAA-2010-0640; Directorate Identifier 2009-NM-142-AD.

Effective Date

    (a) This airworthiness directive (AD) becomes effective December
10, 2010.

Affected ADs

    (b) This AD supersedes AD 2008-09-22, Amendment 39-15503.

Applicability

    (c) This AD applies to EADS CASA (Type Certificate previously
held by Construcciones Aeronauticas, S.A.) Model CN-235, CN-235-100,
CN-235-200, and CN-235-300 airplanes, and Model C-295 airplanes, all
serial numbers; certificated in any category.

Subject

    (d) Air Transport Association (ATA) of America Code 28: Fuel.

Reason

    (e) The mandatory continuing airworthiness information (MCAI)
states:

    Prompted by [an] accident * * *, the FAA published SFAR 88
(Special Federal Aviation Regulation 88). Subsequently, the Joint
Aviation Authorities (JAA) recommended the application of a similar
regulation to the National Aviation Authorities (NAA) of its member
countries. Under this regulation, all holders of type certificates
for passenger transport aeroplanes with either a passenger capacity
of 30 or more, or a payload capacity of 3 402 kg (7 500 lbs) or
more, which have received their certification since 01 January 1958,
are required to conduct a design review against explosion risks.
    In August 2005, EASA [European Aviation Safety Agency] published
a policy statement on the process for developing instructions for
maintenance and inspection of Fuel Tank System ignition source
prevention (EASA D 2005/CPRO), that also included the EASA
expectations with regard to compliance times of the corrective
actions on the unsafe and the not unsafe part of the harmonised
design review results.
    Fuel Airworthiness Limitations arising from the required systems
safety analysis are items that have been shown to have failure
mode(s) associated with an `unsafe condition' as defined in the FAA
memo 2003-112-15 `SFAR 88--Mandatory Action Decision Criteria'.
These are identified in Failure Conditions for which an unacceptable
probability of ignition risk could exist if specific tasks and/or
practices are not performed in accordance with the corrective
action(s) developed by the TC [type certificate] holder.
    To address these potential unsafe conditions, EASA issued AD
2007-0007, mandating the Fuel System Airworthiness Limitations,
comprising maintenance and inspection tasks and Critical Design
Configuration Control Limitations (CDCCL) that were, at that moment,
defined in issue C of EADS-CASA document DT-0-C00-05001. That
document has now been revised and updated to issue D.
    For the reasons described above, this EASA AD retains the
requirements of AD 2007-0007, which is superseded [and corresponds
to FAA AD 2008-09-22], and requires the implementation of the
revised Fuel Airworthiness Limitations contained in issue D of EADS-
CASA document DT-0-C00-05001 and accomplishment of related
modifications.
    The required actions are retaining the limitations for fuel tank
systems, adding thermal insulation to the air condition compression
system, applying double bonding connection on fuel tubes, and
modifying the separation between the center wing electrical harness
and fuel tubes. The application of double bonding connections on
fuel tubes includes doing general visual inspections for damage of
the inside of the fuel tanks, and corrective actions if necessary.
The corrective actions include contacting EADS CASA for repair
instructions and doing the repair. You may obtain further
information by examining the MCAI in the AD docket.

Compliance

    (f) You are responsible for having the actions required by this
AD performed within the compliance times specified, unless the
actions have already been done.

Restatement of Requirements of AD 2008-09-22, With Revised Paragraph
Formatting

    (g) Do the following actions.
    (1) Within 6 months after June 5, 2008 (the effective date of AD
2008-09-22), do the revisions specified in (g)(1)(i) or (g)(1)(ii)
of this AD.
    (i) Revise the Airworthiness Limitations section of the
Instructions for Continued Airworthiness to include the CDCCL data
using a method approved in accordance with the procedures specified
in paragraph (i)(1) of this AD.
    (ii) Revise the Airworthiness Limitations section of the
Instructions for Continued Airworthiness by incorporating the
information in EADS CASA CN-235/C-295 Technical Document DT-0-C00-
05001, Issue C, dated October 2006. Where this EADS CASA technical
document refers to an EADS CASA component maintenance manual (CMM),
use the applicable CMM specified in Table 1 of this AD.

                                            Table 1--Applicable CMMs
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
                                     CDCCL
         CDCCL number             description             CMM             Revision               Date
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
8............................  Fuel pumps......  Parker Hannifin CMM              5  January 10, 2008.
                                                  with Illustrated
                                                  Parts List 28-22-12
                                                  (replaces CM 1C12-
                                                  34).
8............................  Centrifugal fuel  Parker Hannifin CMM              B  November 20, 2006.
                                boost pump.       with Illustrated
                                                  Parts List CM 1C7-
                                                  20, -21 (replaces
                                                  CMM RR54170).
9............................  Low level sensor  EADS CASA CMM with             003  June 15, 2007.
                                                  Illustrated Parts
                                                  List 28-21-12.
10...........................  3/4'' shutoff     Eaton CMM with                   2  June 20, 2006.
                                motorized valve.  Illustrated Parts
                                                  List 28-20-81.

11...........................  2'' motorized     Eaton CMM with                   3  June 20, 2006.
                                spherical plug    Illustrated Parts
                                pressure relief   List 28-10-63.
                                valve.
12...........................  Signal            Gull CMM with                    3  June 28, 2007.
                                conditioner.      Illustrated Parts
                                                  List 28-40-61.
13...........................  Fuel control      Zodiac Intertechnique            3  September 25, 2006.
                                unit.             CMM with Illustrated
                                                  Parts List 28-41-05.
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

    Note 1: Table 1 of this AD does not include CMMs 28-22-15, CE
400150-E01, and C 17MQ0020-005SE, which are listed in EADS CASA CN-
235/C-295 Technical Document DT-0-C00-05001, Issue C, dated October
2006. These CMM document numbers no longer apply. In addition, CMM
document number 28-21-81 in EADS CASA CN-235/C-295 Technical
Document DT-0-C00-05001, Issue C, dated October 2006, should be CMM
document number 28-20-81.

    (2) After accomplishing the actions specified in paragraph
(g)(1) of this AD, no alternative CDCCLs may be used unless the
CDCCLs are approved as an alternative method of compliance (AMOC) in
accordance with the procedures specified in paragraph (i)(1) of this
AD.

New Requirements of This AD

    (h) Do the following actions.
    (1) Within 3 months after the effective date of this AD, revise
the Airworthiness Limitations section of the Instructions for
Continued Airworthiness by incorporating the information in EADS
CASA CN-235/C-295 Technical Document DT-0-C00-05001, Issue D, dated
October 2008. Where this EADS CASA technical document refers to an
EADS CASA CMM, use the applicable CMM specified in Table 1 of this
AD. Doing this revision terminates the requirements specified in
paragraph (g) of this AD.

    Note 2: Notwithstanding any other maintenance or operational
requirements, components that have been identified as airworthy or
installed on the affected airplanes before the revision of the fuel
airworthiness limitations, as required by paragraphs (g) and (h) of
this AD, do not need to be reworked in accordance with the CDCCLs.
However, once the fuel airworthiness limitations have been revised,
future maintenance actions on these components must be done in
accordance with the CDCCLs.

    (2) After accomplishing the actions specified in paragraph
(h)(1) of this AD, no alternative CDCCLs may be used unless the
CDCCLs are approved as an AMOC in accordance with the procedures
specified in paragraph (i)(1) of this AD.
    (3) Within 6 months after the effective date of this AD,
accomplish the modifications specified in paragraphs (h)(3)(i),
(h)(3)(ii), and (h)(3)(iii) of this AD, as applicable.
    (i) For Model CN-235, CN-235-200, and CN-235-300 airplanes
having serial numbers identified in EADS CASA Service Bulletin SB-
235-21-18, dated August 2, 2007: Add thermal insulation to the air
condition compression system, in accordance with the Accomplishment
Instructions of EADS CASA Service Bulletin SB-235-21-18, dated
August 2, 2007.
    (ii) For Model CN-235, CN-235-200, and CN-235-300 airplanes
having serial numbers identified in EADS CASA Service Bulletin SB-
235-28-18, dated August 2, 2007: Apply double bonding connections on
fuel tubes and do general visual inspections for damage inside of
the tank, in accordance with the Accomplishment Instructions of EADS
CASA Service Bulletin SB-235-28-18, dated August 2, 2007. If any
damage is found inside the tank, before further flight, contact EADS
CASA for repair instructions and do the repair.
    (iii) For Model CN-235, CN-235-200, and CN-235-300 airplanes
having serial numbers identified in EADS CASA Service Bulletin SB-
235-24-20, dated August 2, 2007: Modify the separation between the
center wing electrical harnesses and fuel tubes, in accordance with
the Accomplishment Instructions of EADS CASA Service Bulletin SB-
235-24-20, dated August 2, 2007.

FAA AD Difference

    Note 3: This AD differs from the MCAI and/or service information
as follows:
    (1) The European Aviation Safety Agency (EASA) AD 2009-0146,
dated July 3, 2009, inadvertently refers to the incorrect service
bulletins. For applying double bonding connections on fuel tubes and
doing general visual inspections for damage inside the tank, we
refer to EADS CASA Service Bulletin SB-235-28-18, dated August 2,
2007. For modifying the separation between the center wing
electrical harnesses and fuel tubes, we refer to EADS CASA Service
Bulletin SB-235-24-20, dated August 2, 2007.
    (2) The EASA AD 2009-0146, dated July 3, 2009; and EADS CASA
Service Bulletin SB-235-28-18, dated August 2, 2007; do not specify
corrective actions if any damage is found inside the tank. If any
damage is found inside the tank, this AD requires contacting EADS
CASA for repair instructions and doing the repair.

Other FAA AD Provisions

    (i) The following provisions also apply to this AD:
    (1) Alternative Methods of Compliance (AMOCs): The Manager,
International Branch, ANM-116, FAA, has the authority to approve
AMOCs for this AD, if requested using the procedures found in 14 CFR
39.19. Send information to Attn: Shahram Daneshmandi, Aerospace
Engineer, International Branch, ANM-116, Transport Airplane
Directorate, FAA, 1601 Lind Avenue, SW., Renton, Washington 98057-
3356; telephone<PHONE_NUMBER>; fax<PHONE_NUMBER>. Before using any
approved AMOC on any airplane to which the AMOC applies, notify your
principal maintenance inspector (PMI) or principal avionics
inspector (PAI), as appropriate, or lacking a principal inspector,
your local Flight Standards District Office. The AMOC approval
letter must specifically reference this AD.
    (2) Airworthy Product: For any requirement in this AD to obtain
corrective actions from a manufacturer or other source, use these
actions if they are FAA-approved. Corrective actions are considered
FAA-approved if they are approved by the State of Design Authority
(or their delegated agent). You are required to assure the product
is airworthy before it is returned to service.
    (3) Reporting Requirements: For any reporting requirement in
this AD, under the provisions of the Paperwork Reduction Act (44
U.S.C. 3501 et seq.), the Office of Management and Budget (OMB) has
approved the information collection requirements and has assigned
OMB Control Number 2120-0056.

Related Information

    (j) Refer to MCAI EASA Airworthiness Directive 2009-0146, dated
July 3, 2009, the CMMs identified in Table 1 of this AD, and the
service information identified in Table 2 of this AD, for related
information.

                                          Table 2--Service Information
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
                  Document                              Issue                              Date
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
EADS CASA Service Bulletin SB-235-21-18....  Original...................  August 2, 2007.
EADS CASA Service Bulletin SB-235-24-20....  Original...................  August 2, 2007.
EADS CASA Service Bulletin SB-235-28-18....  Original...................  August 2, 2007.
EADS CASA CN-235/C-295 Technical Document    Issue C....................  October 2006.
 DT[dash]0[dash]C00[dash]05001.

EADS CASA CN-235/C-295 Technical Document,   Issue D....................  October 2008.
 DT-0-C00-05001.
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Material Incorporated by Reference

    (k) You must use the service information contained in Table 3 of
this AD to do the actions required by this AD, unless the AD
specifies otherwise.
    (1) The Director of the Federal Register approved the
incorporation by reference of this service information under 5
U.S.C. 552(a) and 1 CFR part 51.
    (2) For service information identified in this AD, contact EADS-
CASA, Military Transport Aircraft Division (MTAD), Integrated
Customer Services (ICS), Technical Services, Avenida de
Arag[oacute]n 404, 28022 Madrid, Spain; telephone +34 91 585 55 84;
fax +34 91 585 55 05; e-mail<EMAIL_ADDRESS>
Internet http://www.eads.net.
    (3) You may review copies of the service information at the FAA,
Transport Airplane Directorate, 1601 Lind Avenue SW., Renton,
Washington. For information on the availability of this material at
the FAA, call<PHONE_NUMBER>.
    (4) You may also review copies of the service information that
is incorporated by reference at the National Archives and Records
Administration (NARA). For information on the availability of this
material at NARA, call<PHONE_NUMBER>, or go to: http://www.archives.gov/federal_register/code_of_federal_regulations/ibr_locations.html.

                                   Table 3--Material Incorporated by Reference
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
                  Document                          Revision/issue                         Date
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
EADS CASA CMM with Illustrated Parts List    Revision 003...............  June 15, 2007.
 28-21-12.
EADS CASA CN-235/C-295 Technical Document    Issue C....................  October 2006.
 DT-0-C00-05001.
EADS CASA CN-235/C-295 Technical Document    Issue D....................  October 2008.
 DT-0-C00-05001.
EADS CASA Service Bulletin SB-235-21-18....  Original...................  August 2, 2007.
EADS CASA Service Bulletin SB-235-24-20....  Original...................  August 2, 2007.
EADS CASA Service Bulletin SB-235-28-18....  Original...................  August 2, 2007.
Eaton CMM with Illustrated Parts List 28-10- Revision 3.................  June 20, 2006.
 63.
Eaton CMM with Illustrated Parts List 28-20- Revision 2.................  June 20, 2006.
 81.
Gull CMM with Illustrated Parts List 28-40-  Revision 3.................  June 28, 2007.
 61.
Parker Hannifin CMM with Illustrated Parts   Revision 5.................  January 10, 2008.
 List 28-22-12.
Parker Hannifin CMM with Illustrated Parts   Revision B.................  November 20, 2006.
 List CM 1C7-20, -21.
Zodiac Intertechnique CMM with Illustrated   Revision 3.................  September 25, 2006.
 Parts List 28-41-05.
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

    (The title page of EADS CASA CMM with Illustrated Parts List 28-
21-12 contains an incorrect revision level; the correct revision
level is 003. The issue date of EADS CASA CN-235/C-295 Technical
Document DT-0-C00-05001, Issue C; and EADS CASA CN-235/C-295
Technical Document DT-0-C00-05001, Issue D; can only be found on the
title page and in the Revisions Record. Certain pages of EADS CASA
Service Bulletin SB-235-28-18 have missing or incomplete document
numbers and dates; the correct document number and dates for those
pages can be found on the first page of that document. The date
shown on the List of Effective Pages for Eaton CMM with Illustrated
Parts List 28-10-63, and Eaton CMM with Illustrated Parts List 28-
20-81, is incorrect; the correct date for that page of those
documents is June 20, 2006. The revision level shown on page 7 of
Parker Hannifin CMM with Illustrated Parts List CM 1C7-20, -21
(replaces CMM RR54170), is incorrect; the correct revision level for
that page is B. The revision level of EADS CASA CN-235/C-295
Technical Document DT-0-C00-05001, Issue C; EADS CASA CN-235/C-295
Technical Document DT-0-C00-05001, Issue D; and Eaton CMM with
Illustrated Parts List 28-20-81; is located only in the Record of
Revisions for those documents.)

    Issued in Renton, Washington, on October 20, 2010.
Michael Kaszycki,
Acting Manager, Transport Airplane Directorate, Aircraft Certification
Service.
[FR Doc. 2010-27615 Filed 11-4-10; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910-13-P


[Federal Register: January 8, 2007 (Volume 72, Number 4)]
[Notices]
[Page 769]
[DOCID:fr08ja07-50]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission

[Docket No. RP06-416-001]

Northwest Pipeline Corporation; Notice of Compliance Filing

December 28, 2006.
    Take notice that on December 22, 2006, Northwest Pipeline
Corporation (Northwest) tendered for filing as part of its FERC Gas
Tariff, Third Revised Volume No. 1, the following tariff sheets, to be
effective January 1, 2007:

Substitute Thirty-First Revised Sheet No. 5
Substitute Sixth Revised Sheet No. 5-C
Substitute First Revised Sheet No. 5-D
Substitute Fourteenth Revised Sheet No. 6

    Northwest states that copies of the filing were served on all
parties on the official service list in the above-captioned proceeding.
    Any person desiring to protest this filing must file in accordance
with Rule 211 of the Commission's Rules of Practice and Procedure (18
CFR 385.211). Protests to this filing will be considered by the
Commission in determining the appropriate action to be taken, but will
not serve to make protestants parties to the proceeding. Such protests
must be filed in accordance with the provisions of Section 154.210 of
the Commission's regulations (18 CFR 154.210). Anyone filing a protest
must serve a copy of that document on all the parties to the
proceeding.
    The Commission encourages electronic submission of protests in lieu
of paper using the ``eFiling'' link at http://www.ferc.gov. Persons

unable to file electronically should submit an original and 14 copies
of the protest to the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission, 888 First
Street, NE., Washington, DC 20426.
    This filing is accessible on-line at http://www.ferc.gov, using the

``eLibrary'' link and is available for review in the Commission's
Public Reference Room in Washington, DC. There is an ``eSubscription''
link on the Web site that enables subscribers to receive e-mail
notification when a document is added to a subscribed docket(s). For
assistance with any FERC Online service, please e-mail
<EMAIL_ADDRESS>or call<PHONE_NUMBER> (toll free). For TTY,

call<PHONE_NUMBER>.

Magalie R. Salas,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. E6-22684 Filed 1-5-07; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 6717-01-P


1 May 17, 2006 Memo to docket: Effect on Emissions of Blending Transmix in Gasoline This memo documents EPA's assessment of the effect on emissions from blending transmix into gasoline. Transmix is a mixture of gasoline and distillate fuels that pipelines generate from their normal operations. Some pipelines and terminals blend very small percentages of transmix ( typically 0.25 volume percent) into gasoline to efficiently dispose of the transmix. Transmix blending is typically limited by the maximum allowable endpoint of the transmix blended gasoline ( 437 degrees Fahrenheit), specified in ASTM's D 4814 88 standard for automotive spark ignition engine fuel.

In addition to affecting gasoline endpoint, blending transmix in gasoline also affects parameters in EPA's complex model, the model used to ensure that gasoline produced by refiners or imported by importers complies with EPA standards. Although the complex model does not use gasoline endpoint to predict gasoline emissions, the complex model does use several other gasoline properties to predict gasoline emissions. These properties include sulfur content, benzene content, aromatics content, olefin content, oxygen content, Reid vapor pressure ( RVP), and two distillation points ( E200 and E300). Compared to gasoline, the distillate fuel portion of transmix contains much less benzene, olefins, and oxygen ( typically zero for all three properties), has a much lower RVP, may contain a moderately greater percentage of aromatics, has significantly lower ( typically zero) E200 and E300 distillation points, and may contain more sulfur.

EPA is primarily concerned with the effect of transmix blending on average gasoline sulfur content. When a small percentage of distillate fuel is blended into gasoline, the complex model predicts slight reductions in emissions of VOC, NOx and toxics. However, the complex model does not fully reflect the effect of gasoline sulfur on emissions. EPA's Tier 2 emissions standards, promulgated after the complex model was developed, require emissions control systems on gasoline powered vehicles which are very sensitive to gasoline sulfur levels. As part of the Tier 2 rulemaking, EPA also promulgated gasoline sulfur regulations which require, beginning in 2006, that all gasoline produced at most refineries or imported by each importer must contain an annual average sulfur content of 30 ppm or less1. Transmix may contain significant percentages of high sulfur distillate fuels such as heating oil and jet fuel, and blending transmix into gasoline could cause an increase in the total sulfur content of the gasoline.

1 Gasoline produced by most refineries or imported by each importer must also contain no more than 80 ppm sulfur per gallon beginning in 2006. However, EPA has allowed flexibility for some refiners to be able to produce gasoline that is higher on both an average basis and a per gallon basis through December 31, 2010. 2 EPA believes, for two reasons, that the potential increase in gasoline sulfur due to the blending of transmix in gasoline will be so small, that the adverse impact on emissions from gasoline engines would be very small. The first reason is that the percentage of transmix that can be blended into gasoline is significantly limited by the amount of distillate fuel in the transmix. Distillate fuels have much higher boiling points than gasoline, so transmix blenders must limit the addition of transmix so that the endpoint of the transmix blended gasoline does not exceed 437 degrees Fahrenheit2. Refiners are already required to produce gasoline with an endpoint less than 437 degrees Fahrenheit under EPA's " substantially similar" requirements for gasoline ( 56 FR 5352, February 11, 1991). Consequently, transmix which contains relatively high percentages of distillate fuel must be blended into gasoline at relatively low percentages so that the endpoint of the transmix blended gasoline does not exceed 437 degrees Fahrenheit. Conversely, transmix which contains a relatively high percentage of gasoline could be blended into gasoline at relatively greater percentages without causing the endpoint of the transmixblended gasoline to exceed 437 degrees Fahrenheit, since the transmix itself is already mostly composed of gasoline.

In order to estimate the future percentage of transmix blended into all gasoline, and likely impact on emissions, EPA contacted thirteen companies that own and operate significant pipeline and terminal systems. Ten of these companies said that they blend transmix at approximately 28 percent of all the terminals they own and operate ( 116 out of 415 total terminals blend transmix). Nine of these companies said they typically blend 0.25 volume percent transmix into gasoline, and one company typically blends 0.50 volume percent transmix into gasoline. One company did not specifically state the number of locations where they blend transmix, but said they blend an average of approximately 0.25 volume percent transmix into all of the gasoline transported through their pipelines and terminals. Another company also did not specifically state the number of locations where they blend transmix, but said they blend approximately 10% of all the transmix they produce into gasoline ( the other 90% of the transmix is reprocessed at transmix processing facilities or crude oil refineries), typically at 0.50 volume percent. Lastly, one company said they have discontinued blending transmix into gasoline because they had difficulty consistently keeping the endpoint of the transmix blended gasoline below 437 degrees Fahrenheit.

2 437 degrees Fahrenheit is the maximum allowable endpoint for gasoline specified in ASTM's standard for automotive spark ignition engine fuel, D 4814 88. Gasoline endpoint is measured using ASTM D86 01, which measures the percentage of a gasoline sample that evaporates, as a function of temperature, as the sample is heated up under controlled conditions. Endpoint is the temperature at which all the volatile portion of a gasoline sample is evaporated. ASTM D4814 88 specifies a maximum allowable endpoint of 437 degrees Fahrenheit in order to limit the amount of higher boiling point compounds that can be present in the gasoline. 3 Based on EPA's conversations with thirteen companies that blend transmix, we estimated that, where transmix is currently blended into gasoline, the average blending rate is slightly higher than 0.25 volume percent. These thirteen companies also told EPA that, at their facilities which currently blend transmix into gasoline, they did not anticipate increasing the percentage of transmix that they blend. However, several companies said they would begin blending transmix into gasoline at new locations, if given the flexibility to do so3, and that they would probably blend an average of 0.25 volume percent transmix into gasoline at these new locations. Considering that not all gasoline will be blended with transmix, we believe that no more than 0.25 volume percent transmix on average will be blended into all gasoline nationwide.

The second reason EPA anticipates that transmix blending will have a small effect on gasoline sulfur is that the distillate fuel portion of transmix will contain significantly less sulfur beginning June, 2006, when the sulfur standard for highway diesel fuel drops sharply from 500 to 15 parts per million ( ppm). Using product sulfur levels and pipeline product sequencing arrangements ( from Chapter 7 of the Regulatory Support Document ( RSD) for the nonroad diesel sulfur regulations), EPA estimates the national average sulfur content of transmix will drop from approximately 800 ppm to 141 ppm, beginning in June, 2006. Table 1 lists the products that EPA anticipates to be present in transmix beginning June, 2006, and their relative contributions to overall sulfur in transmix.

Table 1 Sulfur in transmix beginning June, 2006 typical fraction in ppm contribution component sulfur, ppm transmix to transmix gasoline 30 0.50 15.0 highway diesel 15 0.28 4.2 NRLM diesel 3000 0.00 0.0 heating oil 3500 0.00 0.0 kerosene/ jet fuel 550 0.22 121.8 total 1.00 141.0 3 EPA's current guidance allows transmix to be blended into conventional gasoline at facilities only if the transmix resulted from normal pipeline operations, and either there was no means of transporting the transmix to a transmix processor via pipeline or water, or there was an historical practice of blending transmix at the facility before 1994. The rate of transmix blending was limited to the documented historical blending rate before 1994. The guidance also allows transmix to be blended into reformulated gasoline ( RFG) provided that the transmix resulted from normal pipeline operations, there was no means of transporting the transmix to a transmix processor via pipeline or water, and the transmix could not be blended into conventional gasoline. The rate of transmix blending into RFG was limited to a maximum of 0.25% by volume, provided the transmix blended gasoline met the downstream RFG standards. 4 Although the percentage of gasoline that is blended with transmix is anticipated to increase under today's proposal, EPA anticipates that transmix will be blended into all gasoline nationwide at no more than 0.25 volume percent on average. Blending 0.25 volume percent transmix containing 141 ppm sulfur into gasoline will only raise the sulfur level of the gasoline by approximately 0.3 ppm, or approximately 1 percent of the 30 ppm average standard for most gasoline beginning in 2006.

Since the complex model does not fully reflect the effect of gasoline sulfur on emissions, EPA used MOBILE 6.2.03, EPA's model for calculating emissions from vehicle fleets for a given year, to calculate the percent change in emissions from blending 0.25 volume percent transmix into VOC controlled ( summer) and non VOC controlled ( winter) conventional gasoline. MOBILE 6.2.03 provides a better estimation of emissions because it takes into consideration both the composition of gasoline and the projected composition of a vehicle fleet for a given year.

As mentioned previously, transmix blending affects several gasoline properties that are used in the complex model by refiners to determine compliance with EPA standards. Many of the gasoline properties that are used as inputs to the complex model are also used as inputs to MOBILE 6.2.03. To analyze the effect of transmix blending on emissions, EPA first used MOBILE 6.2.03 to estimate the emissions from conventional gasoline containing no transmix. In this analysis of gasoline containing no transmix, EPA used the national averages of several properties for VOC controlled and non VOCcontrolled conventional gasoline in 2003, the most recent data available from compliance reports sent by refiners to EPA. Table 2 summarizes the conventional gasoline properties used by EPA in MOBILE 6.2.03 to calculate the emissions from conventional gasoline containing no transmix.

Table 2 National average properties for conventional gasoline in 2003 property VOC controlled non VOC controlled RVP, psi 8.29 12.11 benzene, volume percent 1.13 1.09 aromatics, volume percent 27.9 24.9 olefins, volume percent 11.8 11.4 E200, percent 46.0 51.6 E300, percent 80.7 82.9 EPA did not use gasoline sulfur data from 2003 in this analysis, since gasoline sulfur began decreasing in 2004 under EPA's gasoline sulfur regulations. Instead, EPA used values for gasoline sulfur that correspond to the new gasoline sulfur standards in 2006 ( 30 ppm annual average sulfur and 80 ppm per gallon maximum sulfur for most refineries and all importers). Table 3 shows the overall emissions factors calculated by MOBILE 6.2.03 for all vehicles using VOC controlled conventional gasoline containing no transmix, and non VOC controlled conventional gasoline containing no transmix in 2006, and calendar years 2010 through 2050 at 5 year intervals. 5 Table 3 Emissions from conventional gasoline containing no transmix ( total emissions factors for all vehicles)

| VOC controlled| non VOC controlled| VOC CO NOx toxics VOC CO NOx toxics year gms/ mile gms/ mile gms/ mile mgms/ mile gms/ mile gms/ mile gms/ mile mgms/ mile 2006 1.225 10.932 1.879 58.251 1.188 21.478 2.091 71.623 2010 0.880 8.356 1.304 42.573 0.836 17.657 1.487 51.461 2015 0.620 6.598 0.759 31.213 0.580 14.511 0.863 36.907 2020 0.485 5.915 0.508 26.217 0.472 12.947 0.571 30.894 2025 0.421 5.661 0.398 23.586 0.415 12.462 0.443 27.656 2030 0.409 5.541 0.345 22.710 0.395 12.153 0.380 26.275 2035 0.406 5.533 0.331 22.511 0.392 12.142 0.364 26.008 2040 0.406 5.533 0.331 22.511 0.392 12.142 0.364 26.008 2045 0.406 5.533 0.331 22.511 0.392 12.142 0.364 26.008 2050 0.406 5.533 0.331 22.511 0.392 12.142 0.364 26.008 Next, EPA made slight adjustments to gasoline properties to account for the effects of blending 0.25 volume percent transmix into conventional gasoline. EPA increased average gasoline sulfur by 0.3 ppm, decreased gasoline RVP by 0.01 psi, decreased benzene by 0.0015 volume percent, decreased olefins by 0.015 volume percent, decreased E200 and E300 by 0.1 percent, and used MOBILE 6.2.03 to calculate the overall emissions factors for transmix blended gasoline in 2006, and calendar years 2010 through 2050 at 5 year intervals. EPA then subtracted the emissions factors for the transmix blended gasoline from the emissions factors for the non transmix blended gasoline to calculate the change in emissions factors due to transmix blending. Table 4 illustrates that blending 0.25 volume percent transmix into VOC controlled or non VOCcontrolled conventional gasoline causes relatively insignificant changes in emissions factors, and that these changes show little variation over time.

Table 4 Change in emissions from blending 0.25 volume percent transmix into conventional gasoline ( total emissions factors for all vehicles)

| VOC controlled| non VOC controlled VOC CO NOx toxics VOC CO NOx toxics year gms/ mile gms/ mile gms/ mile mgms/ mile gms/ mile gms/ mile gms/ mile mgms/ mile 2006 0.000 0.006 0.001  0.036 0.001 0.014 0.000  0.021 2010  0.001 0.007 0.001  0.025 0.000 0.017 0.000  0.010 2015  0.001 0.007 0.001  0.016 0.000 0.018 0.001  0.006 2020 0.000 0.007 0.000  0.014 0.000 0.018 0.000  0.005 2025  0.001 0.006 0.001  0.013 0.000 0.018 0.000  0.004 2030 0.000 0.007 0.001  0.012 0.001 0.019 0.001  0.003 2035 0.000 0.007 0.000  0.013 0.000 0.019 0.001  0.005 2040 0.000 0.007 0.000  0.013 0.000 0.019 0.001  0.005 2045 0.000 0.007 0.000  0.013 0.000 0.019 0.001  0.005 2050 0.000 0.007 0.000  0.013 0.000 0.019 0.001  0.005 6 Next, EPA calculated the percent change in emissions by dividing the changes in emissions factors shown in Table 4 by the emissions factors for non transmix blended gasoline shown in Table 3. Table 5 summarizes percent changes in emissions due to blending 0.25 volume percent transmix into VOC controlled and non VOC controlled conventional gasoline for 2006, and calendar years 2010 through 2050 at 5 year intervals.

Table 5 Percent change in emissions from blending 0.25 volume percent transmix into conventional gasoline | VOC controlled| non VOC controlled year VOC CO NOx toxics VOC CO NOx toxics 2006 0.00 0.05 0.05  0.06 0.08 0.07 0.00  0.03 2010  0.11 0.08 0.08  0.06 0.00 0.10 0.00  0.02 2015  0.16 0.11 0.13  0.05 0.00 0.12 0.12  0.02 2020 0.00 0.12 0.00  0.05 0.00 0.14 0.00  0.02 2025  0.24 0.11 0.25  0.06 0.00 0.14 0.00  0.01 2030 0.00 0.13 0.29  0.05 0.25 0.16 0.26  0.01 2035 0.00 0.13 0.00  0.06 0.00 0.16 0.27  0.02 2040 0.00 0.13 0.00  0.06 0.00 0.16 0.27  0.02 2045 0.00 0.13 0.00  0.06 0.00 0.16 0.27  0.02 2050 0.00 0.13 0.00  0.06 0.00 0.16 0.27  0.02 As shown in Table 5, the percent change in emissions from blending 0.25 volume percent transmix in VOC controlled conventional gasoline is either slightly negative or zero for VOC and toxics, and slightly positive or zero for CO and NOx. By 2030, when the vehicle fleet has completely turned over to Tier 2 vehicles designed to take full advantage of low sulfur gasoline, the percent change in emissions is either slightly negative or zero for VOC, NOx and toxics, and slightly positive for CO. These changes are small enough that EPA considers them to be negligible.

Table 5 also shows that the percent change in emissions from blending 0.25 volume percent transmix in non VOC controlled conventional gasoline is zero or slightly positive for VOC and NOx, slightly positive for CO, and slightly negative for toxics. By 2030, when the vehicle fleet has completely turned over to Tier 2 vehicles designed to take full advantage of low sulfur gasoline, the percent change in emissions is zero for VOC, slightly positive for CO and NOx, and negative for toxics. Although these percent changes are slightly higher than the percent changes for VOC controlled gasoline, EPA believes they will also have a negligible effect on air quality because they are extremely small in magnitude and also occur outside of the VOC control period ( emissions have a more significant effect on air quality during the warmer VOC control period than during the cooler non VOC control period).

EPA also analyzed the effect of blending transmix on emissions from reformulated gasoline ( RFG), using the same approach as described previously for conventional gasoline. First, EPA used Mobile 6.2.03 to estimate the emissions from RFG containing no transmix. Table 6 summarizes the RFG properties from 2003 used by EPA in MOBILE 6.2.03 to calculate the emissions from RFG containing no transmix. 7 Table 6 National average properties for reformulated gasoline in 2003 property VOC controlled non VOC controlled RVP, psi 6.83 12.05 benzene, volume percent 0.61 0.64 aromatics, volume percent 20.1 19.4 olefins, volume percent 11.0 11.0 E200, percent 47.9 56.0 E300, percent 84.4 85.1 Ethanol fractional market share 0.166 0.207 vol% ethanol in ethanol blended gasoline 8.81 7.81 MTBE fractional market share 0.834 0.793 vol% MTBE in MTBE blended gasoline 11.52 10.00 EPA used values for RFG sulfur that correspond to the new gasoline sulfur standards in 2006 ( 30 ppm annual average sulfur and 80 ppm per gallon maximum sulfur for most refineries and all importers) in this analysis, similar to the analysis of transmix blending in conventional gasoline. Table 7 shows the overall emissions factors calculated by MOBILE 6.2.03 for all vehicles using VOC controlled RFG containing no transmix, and non VOC controlled RFG containing no transmix in 2006, and calendar years 2010 through 2050 at 5 year intervals.

Table 7 Emissions from reformulated gasoline containing no transmix ( total emissions factors for all vehicles)

| VOC controlled| non VOC controlled| VOC CO NOx toxics VOC CO NOx toxics year gms/ mile gms/ mile gms/ mile mgms/ mile gms/ mile gms/ mile gms/ mile mgms/ mile 2006 1.046 10.133 1.875 109.396 1.132 20.294 2.091 87.385 2010 0.757 7.827 1.300 79.837 0.793 16.816 1.487 61.026 2015 0.538 6.204 0.756 56.532 0.549 13.922 0.863 42.391 2020 0.424 5.578 0.506 43.973 0.445 12.471 0.571 34.522 2025 0.365 5.328 0.396 37.357 0.391 12.005 0.443 30.371 2030 0.354 5.217 0.343 36.184 0.373 11.712 0.380 28.825 2035 0.352 5.209 0.329 35.943 0.369 11.701 0.364 28.564 2040 0.352 5.209 0.329 35.943 0.369 11.701 0.364 28.564 2045 0.352 5.209 0.329 35.943 0.369 11.701 0.364 28.564 2050 0.352 5.209 0.329 35.943 0.369 11.701 0.364 28.564 Next, EPA made slight adjustments to gasoline properties to account for the effects of blending 0.25 volume percent transmix into reformulated gasoline. EPA increased average gasoline sulfur by 0.3 ppm, decreased gasoline RVP by 0.01 psi, decreased benzene by 0.0008 volume percent, decreased olefins by 0.014 volume percent, decreased E200 and E300 by 0.1 percent, decreased MTBE in MTBE blended RFG by 0.014 volume percent, and used MOBILE 6.2.03 to calculate the overall emissions factors for transmix blended gasoline in 2006, and calendar years 2010 through 8 2050 at 5 year intervals. EPA then subtracted the emissions factors for the transmixblended gasoline from the emissions factors for the non transmix blended gasoline to calculate the change in emissions factors due to transmix blending. Table 8 illustrates that blending 0.25 volume percent transmix into VOC controlled or non VOC controlled RFG causes relatively insignificant changes in emissions factors, and that these changes show little variation over time.

Table 8 Change in emissions from blending 0.25 volume percent transmix into reformulated gasoline ( total emissions factors for all vehicles)

| VOC controlled| non VOC controlled| VOC CO NOx toxics VOC CO NOx toxics year gms/ mile gms/ mile gms/ mile mgms/ mile gms/ mile gms/ mile gms/ mile mgms/ mile 2006  0.001 0.007 0.000  0.086 0.000 0.014 0.000  0.046 2010  0.001 0.007 0.001  0.054 0.000 0.018 0.000  0.027 2015  0.001 0.007 0.001  0.033 0.000 0.019 0.001  0.016 2020 0.000 0.007 0.000  0.027 0.000 0.019 0.000  0.011 2025 0.000 0.007 0.001  0.023 0.000 0.019 0.000  0.008 2030 0.000 0.006 0.000  0.021 0.000 0.018 0.001  0.007 2035 0.000 0.007 0.000  0.022 0.001 0.019 0.001  0.007 2040 0.000 0.007 0.000  0.022 0.001 0.019 0.001  0.007 2045 0.000 0.007 0.000  0.022 0.001 0.019 0.001  0.007 2050 0.000 0.007 0.000  0.022 0.001 0.019 0.001  0.007 Next, EPA calculated the percent change in emissions by dividing the changes in emissions factors shown in Table 8 by the emissions factors for non transmix blended gasoline shown in Table 7. Table 9 summarizes percent changes in emissions due to blending 0.25 volume percent transmix into VOC controlled and non VOC controlled RFG for 2006, and calendar years 2010 through 2050 at 5 year intervals.

Table 9 Percent change in emissions from blending 0.25 volume percent transmix into RFG | VOC controlled| non VOC controlled| year VOC CO NOx toxics VOC CO NOx toxics 2006  0.10 0.07 0.00  0.08 0.00 0.07 0.00  0.05 2010  0.13 0.09 0.08  0.07 0.00 0.11 0.00  0.04 2015  0.19 0.11 0.13  0.06 0.00 0.14 0.12  0.04 2020 0.00 0.13 0.00  0.06 0.00 0.15 0.00  0.03 2025 0.00 0.13 0.25  0.06 0.00 0.16 0.00  0.03 2030 0.00 0.12 0.00  0.06 0.00 0.15 0.26  0.02 2035 0.00 0.13 0.00  0.06 0.27 0.16 0.27  0.02 2040 0.00 0.13 0.00  0.06 0.27 0.16 0.27  0.02 2045 0.00 0.13 0.00  0.06 0.27 0.16 0.27  0.02 2050 0.00 0.13 0.00  0.06 0.27 0.16 0.27  0.02 As shown in Table 9, the percent change in emissions from blending 0.25 volume percent transmix in VOC controlled RFG is either slightly negative or zero for VOC and toxics, and slightly positive or zero for CO and NOx. By 2030, when the vehicle fleet 9 has completely turned over to Tier 2 vehicles designed to take full advantage of lowsulfur gasoline, the percent change in emissions is either slightly negative or zero for VOC, NOx and toxics, and slightly positive for CO. These changes are small enough that EPA considers them to be negligible.

Table 9 also shows that the percent change in emissions from blending 0.25 volume percent transmix in non VOC controlled RFG is zero or slightly positive for VOC and NOx, slightly positive for CO, and slightly negative for toxics. By 2030, when the vehicle fleet has completely turned over to Tier 2 vehicles designed to take full advantage of low sulfur gasoline, the percent change in emissions slightly positive for VOC, CO and NOx, and negative for toxics. Although these percent changes are slightly higher than the percent changes for VOC controlled gasoline, EPA believes they will also have a negligible effect on air quality because they are extremely small in magnitude and also occur outside of the VOC control period ( emissions have a more significant effect on air quality during the warmer VOC control period than during the cooler non VOCcontrol period).

Chris McKenna


[Federal Register Volume 87, Number 26 (Tuesday, February 8, 2022)]
[Notices]
[Page 7229]
[FR Doc No: 2022-02655]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

Sunshine Act Meetings

TIME AND DATE:  2:00 p.m. on Thursday, February 10, 2022.

PLACE: The meeting will be held via remote means and/or at the
Commission's headquarters, 100 F Street NE, Washington, DC 20549.

STATUS: This meeting will be closed to the public.

MATTERS TO BE CONSIDERED: Commissioners, Counsel to the Commissioners,
the Secretary to the Commission, and recording secretaries will attend
the closed meeting. Certain staff members who have an interest in the
matters also may be present.
    In the event that the time, date, or location of this meeting
changes, an announcement of the change, along with the new time, date,
and/or place of the meeting will be posted on the Commission's website
at https://www.sec.gov.
    The General Counsel of the Commission, or his designee, has
certified that, in his opinion, one or more of the exemptions set forth
in 5 U.S.C. 552b(c)(3), (5), (6), (7), (8), 9(B) and (10) and 17 CFR
200.402(a)(3), (a)(5), (a)(6), (a)(7), (a)(8), (a)(9)(ii) and (a)(10),
permit consideration of the scheduled matters at the closed meeting.
    The subject matter of the closed meeting will consist of the
following topics:
    Institution and settlement of injunctive actions;
    Institution and settlement of administrative proceedings;
    Resolution of litigation claims; and
    Other matters relating to examinations and enforcement proceedings.
    At times, changes in Commission priorities require alterations in
the scheduling of meeting agenda items that may consist of
adjudicatory, examination, litigation, or regulatory matters.

CONTACT PERSON FOR MORE INFORMATION: For further information; please
contact Vanessa A. Countryman from the Office of the Secretary at (202)
551-5400.
    Authority: 5 U.S.C. 552b.

    Dated: February 3, 2022.
Vanessa A. Countryman,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2022-02655 Filed 2-4-22; 11:15 am]
BILLING CODE 8011-01-P


[Federal Register Volume 76, Number 181 (Monday, September 19, 2011)]
[Notices]
[Pages 57982-57983]
[FR Doc No: 2011-23921]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission

Combined Notice of Filings 1

    Take notice that the Commission received the following electric
corporate filings:
    Docket Numbers: EC11-116-000.
    Applicants: International Transmission Company.
    Description: ITC Section 203 Application Regarding Pine Tree Acres
Line.
    Filed Date: 09/09/2011.
    Accession Number: 20110909-5089.
    Comment Date: 5 p.m. Eastern Time on Friday, September 30, 2011.

    Take notice that the Commission received the following electric
rate filings:
    Docket Numbers: ER11-4468-000.
    Applicants: Energy Investments, LLC.
    Description: Energy Investments, LLC submits tariff filing per
35.1: Energy Investments LLC MBR to be effective 9/8/2011.
    Filed Date: 09/08/2011.
    Accession Number: 20110908-5060.
    Comment Date: 5 p.m. Eastern Time on Thursday, September 29, 2011.

    Docket Numbers: ER11-4469-000.
    Applicants: Columbia Utilities Power, LLC.
    Description: Columbia Utilities Power, LLC submits tariff filing
per 35.1: Columbia Utilities Power FERC Electric Tariff to be effective
9/8/2011.
    Filed Date: 09/08/2011.
    Accession Number: 20110908-5066.
    Comment Date: 5 p.m. Eastern Time on Thursday, September 29, 2011.

    Docket Numbers: ER11-4470-000.
    Applicants: Palmco Power NJ, LLC.
    Description: Palmco Power NJ, LLC submits tariff filing per 35.1:
Palmco Power NJ FERC Electric Tariff to be effective 9/8/2011.
    Filed Date: 09/08/2011.
    Accession Number: 20110908-5078.
    Comment Date: 5 p.m. Eastern Time on Thursday, September 29, 2011.

    Docket Numbers: ER11-4471-000.
    Applicants: Palmco Power PA, LLC.
    Description: Palmco Power PA, LLC submits tariff filing per 35.1:
Palmco Power PA FERC Electric Tariff to be effective 9/8/2011.
    Filed Date: 09/08/2011.
    Accession Number: 20110908-5081.
    Comment Date: 5 p.m. Eastern Time on Thursday, September 29, 2011.

    Docket Numbers: ER11-4472-000.
    Applicants: Palmco Power CT, LLC.
    Description: Palmco Power CT, LLC submits tariff filing per 35.1:
Palmco Power CT FERC Electric Tariff to be effective 9/8/2011.
    Filed Date: 09/08/2011.
    Accession Number: 20110908-5082.
    Comment Date: 5 p.m. Eastern Time on Thursday, September 29, 2011.

    Docket Numbers: ER11-4473-000.
    Applicants: Palmco Power MD, LLC.
    Description: Palmco Power MD, LLC submits tariff filing per 35.1:
Palmco Power MD FERC Electric Tariff to be effective 9/8/2011.
    Filed Date: 09/08/2011.
    Accession Number: 20110908-5083.
    Comment Date: 5 p.m. Eastern Time on Thursday, September 29, 2011.

    Docket Numbers: ER11-4474-000.
    Applicants: Oceanside Power LLC.
    Description: Oceanside Power LLC submits tariff filing per 35.1:
Oceanside Power LLC Baseline Tariff Filing to be effective 9/8/2011.
    Filed Date: 09/08/2011.
    Accession Number: 20110908-5099.
    Comment Date: 5 p.m. Eastern Time on Thursday, September 29, 2011.

    Docket Numbers: ER11-4475-000.
    Applicants: Rockland Wind Farm LLC.
    Description: Rockland Wind Farm LLC submits tariff filing per
35.12: Rockland Wind Farm LLC--Market-Based Tariff Filing to be
effective 9/8/2011.
    Filed Date: 09/08/2011.
    Accession Number: 20110908-5121.
    Comment Date: 5 p.m. Eastern Time on Thursday, September 29, 2011.

    Docket Numbers: ER11-4476-000.
    Applicants: Black Hills Power, Inc.
    Description: Black Hills Power, Inc. submits tariff filing per
35.13(a)(2)(iii: Revised JOATT Section 23 to be effective 6/23/2011.
    Filed Date: 09/08/2011.
    Accession Number: 20110908-5142.
    Comment Date: 5 p.m. Eastern Time on Thursday, September 29, 2011.

    Docket Numbers: ER11-4477-000.
    Applicants: Westar Energy, Inc.
    Description: Westar Energy, Inc. submits tariff filing per
35.13(a)(2)(iii: Mid-Kansas Electric Company, LLC, Balancing Area
Services Agreement to be effective 9/1/2011.
    Filed Date: 09/08/2011.
    Accession Number: 20110908-5146.
    Comment Date: 5 p.m. Eastern Time on Thursday, September 29, 2011.

    Docket Numbers: ER11-4478-000.
    Applicants: White Creek Wind I, LLC.
    Description: White Creek Wind I, LLC submits tariff filing per
35.1: White Creek Wind I, LLC MBR Tariff to be effective 8/1/2007.
    Filed Date: 09/08/2011.
    Accession Number: 20110908-5147.
    Comment Date: 5 p.m. Eastern Time on Thursday, September 29, 2011.

    Docket Numbers: ER11-4479-000.
    Applicants: Endure Energy, L.L.C.
    Description: Endure Energy, L.L.C. submits tariff filing per 35.1:
Market Based Rates Re-file to be effective 9/8/2011.
    Filed Date: 09/08/2011.
    Accession Number: 20110908-5168.
    Comment Date: 5 p.m. Eastern Time on Thursday, September 29, 2011.

    Docket Numbers: ER11-4480-000.
    Applicants: California Independent System Operator Corporation.
    Description: California Independent System Operator Corporation
submits tariff filing per 35.13(a)(2)(iii: 2011-09-08 CAISO CDWR PLA
Extension to be effective 9/10/2011.
    Filed Date: 09/08/2011.
    Accession Number: 20110908-5169.
    Comment Date: 5 p.m. Eastern Time on Thursday, September 29, 2011.

    Docket Numbers: ER11-4481-000.
    Applicants: Black Hills Power, Inc.

    Description: Black Hills Power, Inc. submits tariff filing per
35.13(a)(2)(iii: Revised BH Power, Inc., JOATT Section 23 to be
effective 9/9/2011.
    Filed Date: 09/08/2011.
    Accession Number: 20110908-5171.
    Comment Date: 5 p.m. Eastern Time on Thursday, September 29, 2011.

    Docket Numbers: ER11-4482-000.
    Applicants: Madstone Energy Corp.
    Description: Madstone Energy Corp submits tariff filing per 35.12:
FERC Electric Tariff to be effective 10/31/2011.
    Filed Date: 09/09/2011.
    Accession Number: 20110909-5001.
    Comment Date: 5 p.m. Eastern Time on Friday, September 30, 2011.

    Docket Numbers: ER11-4483-000.
    Applicants: ISO New England Inc.
    Description: ISO New England Inc. submits tariff filing per
35.13(a)(2)(iii: ISO-NE OATT Schedule 21--CTMEEC to be effective 11/6/
2011.
    Filed Date: 09/09/2011.
    Accession Number: 20110909-5021.
    Comment Date: 5 p.m. Eastern Time on Friday, September 30, 2011.

    Docket Numbers: ER11-4484-000.
    Applicants: Victoria International Ltd.
    Description: Victoria International Ltd. submits tariff filing per
35.1: Victoria International Ltd Baseline Tariff Filing to be effective
9/9/2011.
    Filed Date: 09/09/2011.
    Accession Number: 20110909-5032.
    Comment Date: 5 p.m. Eastern Time on Friday, September 30, 2011.

    Docket Numbers: ER11-4485-000.
    Applicants: PJM Interconnection, L.L.C.
    Description: PJM Interconnection, L.L.C. submits tariff filing per
35.13(a)(2)(iii: PJM Service Agreement No. 3047 among PJM, Alethea and
JCP&L to be effective 8/10/2011.
    Filed Date: 09/09/2011.
    Accession Number: 20110909-5077.
    Comment Date: 5 p.m. Eastern Time on Friday, September 30, 2011.

    Docket Numbers: ER11-4486-000.
    Applicants: ITC Midwest LLC.
    Description: ITC Midwest LLC submits tariff filing per
35.13(a)(2)(iii: Filing of Agreements with Central Iowa Power
Cooperative to be effective 11/9/2011.
    Filed Date: 09/09/2011.
    Accession Number: 20110909-5101.
    Comment Date: 5 p.m. Eastern Time on Friday, September 30, 2011.

    Docket Numbers: ER11-4487-000.
    Applicants: Public Service Company of Colorado.
    Description: Public Service Company of Colorado submits tariff
filing per 35.13(a)(2)(iii: 2011-9-9--308-PSCo--WAPA--Richard Lk Mtr to
be effective 4/14/2011.
    Filed Date: 09/09/2011.
    Accession Number: 20110909-5104.
    Comment Date: 5 p.m. Eastern Time on Friday, September 30, 2011.

    The filings are accessible in the Commission's eLibrary system by
clicking on the links or querying the docket number.
    Any person desiring to intervene or protest in any of the above
proceedings must file in accordance with Rules 211 and 214 of the
Commission's Regulations (18 CFR 385.211 and 385.214) on or before 5
p.m. Eastern time on the specified comment date. Protests may be
considered, but intervention is necessary to become a party to the
proceeding.
    eFiling is encouraged. More detailed information relating to filing
requirements, interventions, protests, service, and qualifying
facilities filings can be found at: http://www.ferc.gov/docs-filing/efiling/filing-req.pdf. For other information, call<PHONE_NUMBER>
(toll free). For TTY, call<PHONE_NUMBER>.

    Dated: September 9, 2011.
Nathaniel J. Davis, Sr.,
Deputy Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2011-23921 Filed 9-16-11; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6717-01-P


[Federal Register Volume 85, Number 242 (Wednesday, December 16, 2020)]
[Proposed Rules]
[Pages 81440-81441]
[FR Doc No: 2020-27560]

=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION

Pipeline and Hazardous Materials Safety Administration

49 CFR Parts 192 and 195

[Docket No. PHMSA-2019-0199]

Pipeline Safety: Midstream Facilities Frequently Asked Questions

AGENCY: Pipeline and Hazardous Materials Safety Administration (PHMSA);
DOT.

ACTION: Notification and request for comments; extension of comment
period.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: PHMSA published a notification in the Federal Register seeking
public comments on a document titled ``Pipeline Safety: Midstream
Facilities Frequently Asked Questions.'' PHMSA has received a request
to extend the comment period to allow stakeholders more time to
evaluate the frequently asked questions. Upon review of the request,
PHMSA is extending the comment period for an additional 30 days.

DATES: The closing date for filing comments is extended from January 4,
2021, to February 4, 2021.

ADDRESSES: You may submit comments, which should be identified by
docket number PHMSA-2019-0199, by any of the following methods:
     Federal eRulemaking Portal: Comments may be submitted to
http://www.regulations.gov. Please follow the online instructions to
submit comments.
     Mail: Comments may be submitted by mailing them to the
Dockets Management System, U.S. Department of Transportation, Dockets
Operations, M-30, Ground Floor, Room W12-140, 1200 New Jersey Avenue
SE, Washington, DC 20590-0001.
     Hand Delivery: Comments may be submitted by hand
delivering them to 1200 New Jersey Avenue SE, West Building, Ground
Floor, Room W12-140, Washington, DC 20590-0001. Comments may be
delivered between 9 a.m. and 5 p.m. ET, Monday through Friday, except
for Federal holidays.
     Fax: Comments may be faxed to<PHONE_NUMBER>.
     Instructions: Identify docket number PHMSA-2019-0199 at
the beginning of your comments. If you submit your comments by mail,
you must submit two copies. If you wish to receive confirmation that
PHMSA received your comments, you must include a self-addressed stamped
postcard. Internet users should submit comments at http://www.regulations.gov.

     Privacy Act: DOT may solicit comments from the public
regarding certain general notices. DOT posts these comments, without
edit, including any personal information the commenter provides, to
www.regulations.gov, as described in the system of records notice (DOT/
ALL-14 FDMS), which can be reviewed at www.dot.gov/privacy.
     Confidential Business Information: Confidential Business
Information (CBI) is commercial or financial information that is both
customarily and actually treated as private by its owner. Under the
Freedom of Information Act (FOIA) (5 U.S.C. 552), CBI is exempt from
public disclosure. If your comments responsive to this document contain
commercial or financial information that is customarily treated as
private, that you actually treat as private, and that is relevant or
responsive to this document, it is important that you clearly designate
the submitted comments as CBI. Pursuant to 49 CFR 190.343, you may ask
PHMSA to give confidential treatment to information you give to the
agency by taking the following steps: (1) Mark each page of the
original document submission containing CBI as ``Confidential''; (2)
send PHMSA, along with the original document, a second copy of the
original document with the CBI deleted; and (3) explain why the
information you are submitting is CBI. Unless you are notified
otherwise, PHMSA will treat such marked submissions as confidential
under FOIA, and they will not be placed in the public docket of this
notification. Submissions containing CBI should be sent to Sayler
Palabrica at<EMAIL_ADDRESS>Any commentary PHMSA receives
that is not specifically designated as CBI will be placed in the public
docket for this rulemaking.
     Docket: The docket containing background documents and
received comments is available at http://www.regulations.gov. Once on
this site, please follow the online instructions for accessing the
dockets. Alternatively, you may review these documents in person at the
street address listed above.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: For further information contact Sayler
Palabrica at<PHONE_NUMBER> or by email at<EMAIL_ADDRESS>
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

Background

    On November 4, 2020, (85 FR 70124) PHMSA published a document
titled ``Pipeline Safety: Midstream Facilities Frequently Asked
Questions'' requesting public comments on a set of seven draft
frequently asked questions developed by the Midstream Processing
Working Group, established by the Gas Pipeline Advisory Committee and
the Liquid Pipeline Advisory Committee. On December 4, 2020, PHMSA
received a comment extension request submitted by the following
entities:

 Association of Oil Pipelines
 American Petroleum Institute
 Interstate Natural Gas Association of America
 American Gas Association
 GPA Midstream Association

    This request is available in the docket for this notification.
PHMSA believes that extension of the comment period is warranted based
on the information provided in the request. Therefore, PHMSA has
extended the comment period from January 4, 2021, to February 4, 2021.

    Issued in Washington, DC, on December 10, 2020, under authority
delegated in 49 CFR 1.97.
Alan K. Mayberry,
Associate Administrator for Pipeline Safety.
[FR Doc. 2020-27560 Filed 12-15-20; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910-60-P


[Federal Register Volume 86, Number 184 (Monday, September 27, 2021)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Pages 53218-53220]
[FR Doc No: 2021-20882]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY

Coast Guard

33 CFR Part 165

[Docket Number USCG-2021-0747]
RIN 1625-AA00

Safety Zone; Tugs Champion, Valerie B, Nancy Anne and Barges
Kokosing I, Kokosing III, Kokosing IV Operating in the Straits of
Mackinac, MI

AGENCY: Coast Guard, Department of Homeland Security (DHS).

ACTION: Temporary final rule.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Coast Guard is establishing a temporary safety zone for
the navigable water within a 500-yard radius of several tugs and barges
in the Straits of Mackinac. The safety zone is needed to protect
personnel, vessels, and the marine environment from the potential
hazards created by the work, inspection, surveying and the removal and
replacement of cables for the Straits of Mackinac. Entry of vessels or
persons into the zone is prohibited unless specifically authorized by
the Captain of the Port Sault Sainte Marie or their designated
representative.

DATES: This rule is effective from October 1, 2021, through November
30, 2021.

ADDRESSES: To view documents mentioned in this preamble as being
available in the docket, go to https://www.regulations.gov, type USCG-
2021-0747 in the search box and click ``Search.'' Next, in the Document
Type column, select ``Supporting & Related Material.''

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: If you have questions on this rule,
call or email LT Deaven S. Palenzuela, Sector Sault Sainte Marie
Waterways Management Division, U.S. Coast Guard at<PHONE_NUMBER> or
email<EMAIL_ADDRESS>
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

I. Table of Abbreviations

CFR Code of Federal Regulations
DHS Department of Homeland Security
FR Federal Register
NPRM Notice of proposed rulemaking
Sec.  Section
U.S.C. United States Code

II. Background Information and Regulatory History

    The Coast Guard is issuing this temporary rule without prior notice
and opportunity to comment pursuant to authority under section 4(a) of
the Administrative Procedure Act (APA) (5 U.S.C. 553(b)). This
provision authorizes an agency to issue a rule without prior notice and
opportunity to comment when the agency for good cause finds that those
procedures are ``impracticable, unnecessary, or contrary to the public
interest.'' Under 5 U.S.C. 553(b)(B), the Coast Guard finds that good
cause exists for not publishing a notice of proposed rulemaking (NPRM)
with respect to this rule because doing so would be impracticable. This
temporary final rule is an extention in order for the company to
complete their project scope taking into account any delays due to
heavy weather or vessel issues that are out of their control. Delaying
this rule to allow for a notice and full comment period would be
impracticable because it would inhibit the Coast Guard's ability to
protect the public from the potential hazards associated with the
continuation of the aforementioned operation on October 1, 2021, with a
new prospective completion date of November 30, 2021.
    Under 5 U.S.C. 553(d)(3), the Coast Guard finds that good cause
exists for making this rule effective less than 30 days after
publication in the Federal Register. For the same reasons discussed in
the preceding paragraph, delaying the continuation effective date of
this rule would be impracticable because immediate action is needed to
respond to the potential safety hazards associated with the work,
inspections, and surveying of underwater infrastructure.

III. Legal Authority and Need for Rule

    The Coast Guard is issuing this rule under authority in 46 U.S.C.
70034 (previously 33 U.S.C. 1231). The Captain of the Port Sault Sainte
Marie (COTP) has determined that potential hazards associated with the
work, inspection, and surveying of underwater infrastructure in the
Straits of Mackinac starting April 20, 2021, will be a safety concern
for anyone within a 500-yard radius of the tugs and barges. This rule
is needed to protect personnel, vessels, and the marine environment in
the navigable waters within the safety zone while the operation is
conducted.

IV. Discussion of the Rule

    This rule establishes a continuation safety zone from October 1,
2021, to November 30, 2021. The safety zone will cover all navigable
waters within 500 yards of the tugs and barges being used to work,
inspect, survey and remove/replace cables in the Straits of Mackinac.
The duration of the zone is intended to protect personnel, vessels, and
the marine environment in these navigable waters while the operation is
conducted. No vessel or person will be permitted to enter the safety
zone without obtaining permission from the COTP or a designated
representative.

V. Regulatory Analyses

    We developed this rule after considering numerous statutes and
Executive orders related to rulemaking. Below we summarize our analyses
based on a number of these statutes and Executive orders, and we
discuss First Amendment rights of protestors.

A. Regulatory Planning and Review

    Executive Orders 12866 and 13563 direct agencies to assess the
costs and benefits of available regulatory alternatives and, if
regulation is necessary, to select regulatory approaches that maximize
net benefits. This rule has not been designated a ``significant
regulatory action,'' under Executive Order 12866. Accordingly, this
rule has not been reviewed by the Office of Management and Budget
(OMB).
    This regulatory action determination is based on the size and
location of the safety zone. Vessel traffic will be able to safely
transit around this safety zone which would impact a small designated
area of the Straits of Mackinac. Moreover, the Coast Guard will issue a
Broadcast Notice to Mariners via VHF-FM marine channel 16 about the
zone, and the rule would allow vessels to seek permission to enter the
zone.

B. Impact on Small Entities

    The Regulatory Flexibility Act of 1980, 5 U.S.C. 601-612, as
amended, requires Federal agencies to consider the potential impact of
regulations on small entities during rulemaking. The term ``small
entities'' comprises small businesses, not-for-profit organizations
that are independently owned and operated and are not dominant in their
fields, and governmental jurisdictions with populations of less than
50,000. The Coast Guard certifies under 5 U.S.C. 605(b) that this rule
will not have a significant economic impact on a substantial number of
small entities.
    While some owners or operators of vessels intending to transit the
safety zone may be small entities, for the reasons stated in section
V.A above, this rule will not have a significant economic impact on any
vessel owner or operator.
    Under section 213(a) of the Small Business Regulatory Enforcement
Fairness Act of 1996 (Pub. L. 104-121), we want to assist small
entities in understanding this rule. If the rule would affect your
small business, organization, or governmental jurisdiction and you have
questions concerning its provisions or options for compliance, please
call or email the person listed in the FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT
section.
    Small businesses may send comments on the actions of Federal
employees who enforce, or otherwise determine compliance with, Federal
regulations to the Small Business and Agriculture Regulatory
Enforcement Ombudsman and the Regional Small Business Regulatory
Fairness Boards. The Ombudsman evaluates these actions annually and
rates each agency's responsiveness to small business. If you wish to
comment on actions by

employees of the Coast Guard, call 1-888-REG-FAIR (1-888-734-3247). The
Coast Guard will not retaliate against small entities that question or
complain about this rule or any policy or action of the Coast Guard.

C. Collection of Information

    This rule will not call for a new collection of information under
the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 (44 U.S.C. 3501-3520).

D. Federalism and Indian Tribal Governments

    A rule has implications for federalism under Executive Order 13132,
Federalism, if it has a substantial direct effect on the States, on the
relationship between the National Government and the States, or on the
distribution of power and responsibilities among the various levels of
government. We have analyzed this rule under that order and have
determined that it is consistent with the fundamental federalism
principles and preemption requirements described in Executive Order
13132.
    Also, this rule does not have tribal implications under Executive
Order 13175, Consultation and Coordination with Indian Tribal
Governments, because it does not have a substantial direct effect on
one or more Indian tribes, on the relationship between the Federal
Government and Indian tribes, or on the distribution of power and
responsibilities between the Federal Government and Indian tribes.

E. Unfunded Mandates Reform Act

    The Unfunded Mandates Reform Act of 1995 (2 U.S.C. 1531-1538)
requires Federal agencies to assess the effects of their discretionary
regulatory actions. In particular, the Act addresses actions that may
result in the expenditure by a State, local, or tribal government, in
the aggregate, or by the private sector of $100,000,000 (adjusted for
inflation) or more in any one year. Though this rule will not result in
such an expenditure, we do discuss the effects of this rule elsewhere
in this preamble.

F. Environment

    We have analyzed this rule under Department of Homeland Security
Directive 023-01, Rev. 1, associated implementing instructions, and
Environmental Planning COMDTINST 5090.1 (series), which guide the Coast
Guard in complying with the National Environmental Policy Act of 1969
(42 U.S.C. 4321-4370f), and have determined that this action is one of
a category of actions that do not individually or cumulatively have a
significant effect on the human environment. This rule involves a
safety zone that will prohibit entry within 500 yards of tugs and
barges used to work, inspect, survey and remove/replace cables in the
Straits of Mackinac. It is categorically excluded from further review
under paragraph L[60(a)] of Appendix A, Table 1 of DHS Instruction
Manual 023-01-001-01, Rev. 1. A Record of Environmental Consideration
supporting this determination is available in the docket. For
instructions on locating the docket, see the ADDRESSES section of this
preamble.

G. Protest Activities

    The Coast Guard respects the First Amendment rights of protesters.
Protesters are asked to call or email the person listed in the FOR
FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT section to coordinate protest activities so
that your message can be received without jeopardizing the safety or
security of people, places or vessels.

List of Subjects in 33 CFR Part 165

    Harbors, Marine safety, Navigation (water), Reporting and
recordkeeping requirements, Security measures, Waterways.

    For the reasons discussed in the preamble, the Coast Guard amends
33 CFR part 165 as follows:

PART 165--REGULATED NAVIGATION AREAS AND LIMITED ACCESS AREAS

0
1. The authority citation for part 165 continues to read as follows:

    Authority:  46 U.S.C. 70034, 70051; 33 CFR 1.05-1, 6.04-1, 6.04-
6, and 160.5; Department of Homeland Security Delegation No.
00170.1, Revision No. 01.2.

0
2. Add Sec.  165.T09-0747 to read as follows:

Sec.  165.T09-0747   Safety Zone; Tugs Champion, Valerie B, Nancy Anne
and Barges Kokosing I, Kokosing III, Kokosing IV operating in the
Straits of Mackinac, MI.

    (a) Location. The following areas are safety zones: All navigable
water within 500 yards of the Tugs Valerie B, Nancy Anne, Champion and
Barges Kokosing I, III, and IV while conducting work, inspection,
surveying and removing/replacing cables in the Straits of Mackinac.
    (b) Definitions. As used in this section, designated representative
means a Coast Guard Patrol Commander, including a Coast Guard coxswain,
petty officer, or other officer operating a Coast Guard vessel and a
Federal, State, and local officer designated by or assisting the
Captain of the Port Sault Sainte Marie (COTP) in the enforcement of the
safety zone.
    (c) Regulations. (1) In accordance with the general regulations in
Sec.  165.23, entry into, transiting, or anchoring within the safety
zone described in paragraph (a) of this section is prohibited unless
authorized by the Captain of the Port, Sault Sainte Marie or his
designated representative.
    (2) Before a vessel operator may enter or operate within the safety
zones, they must obtain permission from the Captain of the Port, Sault
Sainte Marie, or his designated representative via VHF Channel 16 or
telephone at<PHONE_NUMBER>. Vessel operators given permission to enter
or operate in the safety zone must comply with all orders given to them
by the Captain of the Port, Sault Sainte Marie or his designated
representative.
    (d) Enforcement period. This section will be enforced from October
1, 2021, to November 30, 2021.

    Dated: September 21, 2021.
A.R. Jones,
Captain, U.S. Coast Guard, Captain of the Port Sault Sainte Marie.
[FR Doc. 2021-20882 Filed 9-24-21; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 9110-04-P


[Federal Register Volume 81, Number 167 (Monday, August 29, 2016)]
[Notices]
[Pages 59256-59257]
[FR Doc No: 2016-20576]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

[Release No. 34-78653; File No. SR-BatsBZX-2016-30]

Self-Regulatory Organizations; Bats BZX Exchange, Inc.; Notice of
Designation of a Longer Period for Commission Action on Proposed Rule
Change to BZX Rule 14.11(e)(4), Commodity-Based Trust Shares, To List
and Trade Winklevoss Bitcoin Shares Issued by the Winklevoss Bitcoin
Trust

August 23, 2016.
    On June 30, 2016, Bats BZX Exchange, Inc. (``BZX'') filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission (``Commission''), pursuant to
Section 19(b)(1) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (``Act'') \1\
and Rule 19b-4 thereunder,\2\ a proposed rule change to list and trade
Winklevoss Bitcoin Shares issued by the Winklevoss Bitcoin Trust under
BZX Rule 14.11(e)(4). The proposed rule change was published for
comment in the Federal Register on July 14, 2016.\3\ The Commission has
received five comment letters on the proposed rule change.\4\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \1\ 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(1).
    \2\ 17 CFR 240.19b-4.
    \3\ See Securities Exchange Act Release No. 78262 (Jul. 8,
2016), 81 FR 45554.
    \4\ See Letters from Robert D. Miller, VP Technical Services,
RKL eSolutions (Jul. 11, 2016); Jorge Stolfi, Full Professor,
Institute of Computing UNICAMP (Jul. 13, 2016); Guillaume
Lethuillier (Jul. 26, 2016); Michael B. Casey (Jul. 31, 2016); and
Erik A. Aronesty, Sr. Software Engineer, Bloomberg LP (Aug. 2,
2016). All comments on the proposed rule change are available on the
Commission's Web site at: https://www.sec.gov/comments/sr-batsbzx-2016-30/batsbzx201630.shtml.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    Section 19(b)(2) of the Act \5\ provides that, within 45 days of
the publication of notice of the filing of a proposed rule change, or
within such longer period up to 90 days as the Commission may designate
if it finds such longer period to be appropriate and publishes its
reasons for so finding or as to which the self-regulatory organization
consents, the Commission shall either approve the proposed rule change,
disapprove the proposed rule change, or institute proceedings to
determine whether the proposed rule change should be disapproved. The
Commission is extending this 45-day time period. The Commission finds
that it is appropriate to designate a longer period within which to
take action on the proposed rule change so that it has sufficient time
to consider the proposed rule change.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \5\ 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(2).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    Accordingly, the Commission, pursuant to Section 19(b)(2) of the
Act,\6\

designates October 12, 2016, as the date by which the Commission shall
either approve or disapprove or institute proceedings to determine
whether to disapprove the proposed rule change (File Number SR-BatsBZX-
2016-30).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \6\ Id.

    For the Commission, by the Division of Trading and Markets,
pursuant to delegated authority.\7\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \7\ 17 CFR 200.30-3(a)(31).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

Robert W. Errett,
Deputy Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2016-20576 Filed 8-26-16; 8:45 am]
 BILLING CODE 8011-01-P


<!DOCTYPE html PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD XHTML 1.0 Transitional//EN" "http://www.w3.org/TR/xhtml1/DTD/xhtml1-transitional.dtd">

<meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=UTF-8">

<title>
Onsite Sewage Programs Statistical Data - Bureau of Onsite Sewage Programs
</title>

  <meta name="keywords" content="Onsite Sewage, septic system, bureau of onsite sewage programs, septic, Florida department of health, 64E-6 FAC, OSTDS, environmental health, statistics, statistical cata">

  <link href="./FDOH 2009_files/doh.css" rel="stylesheet" type="text/css">

<meta name="Author" content="Department of Health, Division of Environmental Health, Environmental Health">
<link rel="stylesheet" type="text/css" href="./FDOH 2009_files/dohehwww.css">

<form method="get" action="http://www.doh.state.fl.us/Search/search.cgi">
  <input name="zoom_query" size="18" class="search" type="text"> <input name="zoom_cat[]" value="0" type="hidden"> <input value="Submit" class="submit" type="submit"> </form>

 Print
This Page

EH Home

		About Us

		Communities

		Radiation

		Medicine

		Water

		Sewage

		Programs

		Newsroom

		Data

 Bureau of Onsite Sewage > statistics > OSTDS Statistical Data

Onsite Sewage Programs Statistical Data

Onsite Sewage Treatment and Disposal Systems Statistical Data

(The following documents are less than 20 kb in size and open in a new window)

					OSTDS New Installations

					OSTDS Repairs

*Note: The above materials are in the Portable Document Format (PDF). You may need to download the free
		 Adobe Acrobat Reader
		to view the files.

	Back To Top

    Home
	: About Us :
	Community EH : Radiation :

	Medicine :

	Water : Sewage          :

	Programs : Newsroom

      Privacy
Statement * Disclaimer

      Accessibility
Information * Email
Advisory