[Federal Register Volume 79, Number 166 (Wednesday, August 27, 2014)]
[Notices]
[Page 51184]
[FR Doc No: 2014-20331]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES

Food and Drug Administration

[Docket No. FDA-2014-N-0007]

Outsourcing Facility Fee Rates for Fiscal Year 2015; Correction

AGENCY: Food and Drug Administration, HHS.

ACTION: Notice; correction.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Food and Drug Administration is correcting a notice
entitled ``Outsourcing Facility Fee Rates for Fiscal Year 2015'' that
appeared in the Federal Register of August 1, 2014 (79 FR 44805). The
document announced the rates for fiscal year 2015 for the establishment
and reinspection fees related to human drug compounding outsourcing
facilities that elect to register under the Federal Food, Drug, and
Cosmetic Act. The document was published with the incorrect docket
number. This document corrects that error.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Lisa Granger, Office of Policy, Food
and Administration, 10990 New Hampshire Ave., Bldg. 32, Rm. 3330,
Silver Spring, MD 20993-0002,<PHONE_NUMBER>.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: In the Federal Register of Friday, August 1,
2014, in FR Doc. 2014-18111, the following correction is made:
    1. On page 44805, in the first column, in the Docket No. heading,
``[Docket No. FDA-2013-N-0007]'' is corrected to read ``[Docket No.
FDA-2014-N-0007]''.

    Dated: August 21, 2014.
Peter Lurie,
Associate Commissioner for Policy and Planning.
[FR Doc. 2014-20331 Filed 8-26-14; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4164-01-P


[Federal Register Volume 87, Number 139 (Thursday, July 21, 2022)]
[Notices]
[Page 43516]
[FR Doc No: 2022-15606]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission

[Docket No. EF14-1-004]

Southwestern Power Administration; Notice of Filing

    Take notice that on September 7, 2021, Southwestern Power
Administration submitted tariff filing: 2013 Integrated System Rate
Extension Informational Filing--2021 to be effective 10/1/2021.
    Any person desiring to intervene or to protest this filing must
file in accordance with Rules 211 and 214 of the Commission's Rules of
Practice and Procedure (18 CFR 385.211, 385.214). Protests will be
considered by the Commission in determining the appropriate action to
be taken, but will not serve to make protestants parties to the
proceeding. Any person wishing to become a party must file a notice of
intervention or motion to intervene, as appropriate. Such notices,
motions, or protests must be filed on or before the comment date. On or
before the comment date, it is not necessary to serve motions to
intervene or protests on persons other than the Applicant.
    The Commission strongly encourages electronic filings of comments,
protests and interventions in lieu of paper using the ``eFiling'' link
at http://www.ferc.gov. Persons unable to file electronically may mail
similar pleadings to the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission, 888
First Street NE, Washington, DC 20426. Hand delivered submissions in
docketed proceedings should be delivered to Health and Human Services,
12225 Wilkins Avenue, Rockville, Maryland 20852.
    In addition to publishing the full text of this document in the
Federal Register, the Commission provides all interested persons an
opportunity to view and/or print the contents of this document via the
internet through the Commission's Home Page (http://ferc.gov) using the
``eLibrary'' link. Enter the docket number excluding the last three
digits in the docket number field to access the document. At this time,
the Commission has suspended access to the Commission's Public
Reference Room, due to the proclamation declaring a National Emergency
concerning the Novel Coronavirus Disease (COVID-19), issued by the
President on March 13, 2020. For assistance, contact the Federal Energy
Regulatory Commission at [email protected] or call toll-free,
(886) 208-3676 or TYY,<PHONE_NUMBER>.
    Comment Date: 5:00 p.m. Eastern Time on August 1, 2022.

    Dated: July 15, 2022.
Debbie-Anne A. Reese,
Deputy Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2022-15606 Filed 7-20-22; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6717-01-P


[Federal Register Volume 77, Number 221 (Thursday, November 15, 2012)]
[Notices]
[Pages 68196-68197]
[FR Doc No: 2012-27844]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION

Federal Aviation Administration

[Docket No. FAA-2012-1191]

Orders Limiting Operations at John F. Kennedy International
Airport, LaGuardia Airport, and Newark Liberty International Airport;
High Density Rule at Reagan Washington National Airport

AGENCY: Federal Aviation Administration (FAA), DOT.

ACTION: Notice of Limited Waiver of the Slot Usage Requirement.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: This action announces a limited waiver of the requirement to
use Operating Authorizations (slots) at John F. Kennedy International
Airport (JFK), LaGuardia Airport (LGA), and Newark

Liberty International Airport (EWR). This action also declines to grant
a waiver of the requirement to use slots at Reagan Washington National
Airport. This waiver is effective from October 28, 2012 through
November 2, 2012.

DATES: Effective November 15, 2012.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Robert Hawks, Office of the Chief
Counsel, Federal Aviation Administration, 800 Independence Avenue SW.,
Washington, DC 20591; telephone:<PHONE_NUMBER>; email:
<EMAIL_ADDRESS>
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

Background

    On October 29, 2012, Hurricane Sandy made landfall in southern New
Jersey. Combined with another weather front, Hurricane Sandy
transitioned to an extratropical storm that caused widespread power
outages, severe flooding, and severe disruption of transportation
systems in the northeastern and mid-Atlantic United States. This
disruption included airport closures and mass cancellation of scheduled
flights.
    The degree of disruption and cancellations varied by airport across
the region, and flight disruptions occurred at slot-controlled and non-
slot-controlled airports. JFK and EWR were effectively closed on
October 29 and 30 and had limited operational capacity on October 31.
LGA was effectively closed from October 29 through October 31 and had
limited operational capacity on November 1. DCA was effectively closed
on October 29 and 30 and had reduced operational capacity on October
31. Recovery of normal operations took several days after the storm.

FAA Analysis

    Under the FAA's High Density Rule at DCA and Orders limiting
operations at LGA, JFK, and EWR, slots must be used at least 80 percent
of the time. These rules are expected to accommodate routine weather
and other cancellations under all but the most unusual circumstances.
Slots not meeting the minimum usage requirement will be withdrawn or
not receive historic precedence for the following scheduling season,
depending on the airport.\1\ The FAA may grant a waiver from the
minimum usage requirement in highly unusual and unpredictable
conditions that are beyond the control of the carrier and affect
carrier operations for a period of five or more consecutive days (for
LGA, JFK, and EWR) or of nine or more consecutive days (for DCA).
However, the FAA does not routinely grant general waivers to the usage
requirement except under the most unusual circumstances.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \1\ 14 CFR 93.227 (DCA); 74 FR 51648 (Oct. 7, 2009) (EWR); 74 FR
51650 (Oct. 7, 2009) (JFK); 77 FR 30585 (May 23, 2012) (LGA).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    The FAA has granted waivers of the slot usage requirement in
circumstances similar to those of Hurricane Sandy. The FAA generally
considers the days of the weather event as well as a couple additional
days to resume normal operations. For example, in February 2010, the
FAA granted a general waiver because unusual snowstorms closed slot-
controlled airports for multiple days and also caused mass
cancellations resulting from reduced airport capacity.
    For LGA, JFK, and EWR, the FAA has determined the unusual
circumstances created by Hurricane Sandy meet the criteria for a
limited waiver of the minimum slot usage requirement. Accordingly, the
FAA will treat as used any slot or Operating Authorization held by a
carrier from October 28 through November 2, 2012.
    For DCA, the FAA has determined that overall operational disruption
did not last for the required nine or more consecutive days.
Operational data show normal operations largely had resumed by November
1, 2012.
    Although the FAA has determined that a general waiver of the usage
requirement is inappropriate for DCA, it acknowledges that some
carriers operate flights between DCA and airports in the NYC area or
northeastern U.S. affected by the storm. These circumstances may have
created a unique hardship for those carriers justifying waiver relief.
To assess that hardship and determine whether relief is warranted, the
FAA requests that affected carriers submit an individual request for
limited waiver. However, a carrier must demonstrate operational
disruptions of scheduled flights that lasted nine or more consecutive
days to be eligible for waiver relief.

FAA Decision

    In consideration of the foregoing, the FAA GRANTS a limited waiver
of the usage requirement for LGA, JFK, and EWR for the period from
October 28 through November 2, 2012.

    Issued in Washington, DC, on November 7, 2012.
Rebecca B. MacPherson,
Assistant Chief Counsel for International Law, Legislation, and
Regulations.
[FR Doc. 2012-27844 Filed 11-14-12; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910-13-P


[Federal Register Volume 81, Number 103 (Friday, May 27, 2016)]
[Notices]
[Page 33670]
[FR Doc No: 2016-12590]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY

[ER-FRL-9027-2]

Environmental Impact Statements; Notice of Availability

    Responsible Agency: Office of Federal Activities, General
Information<PHONE_NUMBER> or http://www2.epa.gov/nepa.

Weekly receipt of Environmental Impact Statements (EISs)
Filed 05/16/2016 through 05/20/2016
Pursuant to 40 CFR 1506.9.

Notice

    Section 309(a) of the Clean Air Act requires that EPA make public
its comments on EISs issued by other Federal agencies. EPA's comment
letters on EISs are available at: https://cdxnodengn.epa.gov/cdx-enepa-public/action/eis/search.
EIS No. 20160110, Draft, USFS, CA, Revision of the Inyo, Sequoia and
Sierra National Forests Land Management Plans, Comment Period Ends: 08/
25/2016, Contact: Debra Whitall<PHONE_NUMBER>.
EIS No. 20160111, Draft, TVA, TN, Bull Run Fossil Plant Landfill,
Comment Period Ends: 07/12/2016, Contact: Anita Masters<PHONE_NUMBER>.

    Dated: May 24, 2016.
Dawn Roberts,
Management Analyst, NEPA Compliance Division, Office of Federal
Activities.
[FR Doc. 2016-12590 Filed 5-26-16; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6560-50-P


[Federal Register: July 11, 2006 (Volume 71, Number 132)]
[Notices]
[Page 39080-39081]
[DOCID:fr11jy06-55]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission

 Notice of Issuance of Order

July 3, 2006.

ExxonMobil Baton Rouge Complex (Docket No. ER06-771-000); ExxonMobil
Beaumont Complex (Docket No. ER06-771-001); Exxon Mobil LaBarge Shute
Creek Treating Facility (Docket Nos. ER06-772-000, ER06-772-001, ER06-
773-000 and ER06-773-001)

    ExxonMobil Baton Rouge Complex, Exxon Mobil Beaumont Complex and
ExxonMobil LaBarge Shute Creek Treating Facility (ExxonMobil) filed an
application for market-based rate authority, with an accompanying rate
tariffs. The proposed market-based rate tariffs provide for the sale of
energy, capacity and ancillary services at market-based rates.
ExxonMobil also requested waivers of various Commission regulations. In
particular, ExxonMobil requested that the Commission grant blanket
approval under 18 CFR part 34 of all future issuances of securities and
assumptions of liability by Silver Springs.
    On June 27, 2006, pursuant to delegated authority, the Director,

Division of Tariffs and Market Development--West, granted the requests
for blanket approval under part 34. The Director's order also stated
that the Commission would publish a separate notice in the Federal
Register establishing a period of time for the filing of protests.
Accordingly, any person desiring to be heard or to protest the blanket
approvals of issuances of securities or assumptions of liability by
ExxonMobil should file a motion to intervene or protest with the
Federal Energy Regulatory Commission, 888 First Street, NE.,
Washington, DC 20426, in accordance with Rules 211 and 214 of the
Commission's Rules of Practice and Procedure. 18 CFR 385.211, 385.214
(2004).
    Notice is hereby given that the deadline for filing motions to
intervene or protest is July 27, 2006.
    Absent a request to be heard in opposition by the deadline above,
ExxonMobil is authorized to issue securities and assume obligations or
liabilities as a guarantor, indorser, surety, or otherwise in respect
of any security of another person; provided that such issuance or
assumption is for some lawful object within the corporate purposes of
ExxonMobil, compatible with the public interest, and is reasonably
necessary or appropriate for such purposes.
    The Commission reserves the right to require a further showing that
neither public nor private interests will be adversely affected by
continued approvals of ExxonMobil's issuances of securities or
assumptions of liability.
    Copies of the full text of the Director's Order are available from
the Commission's Public Reference Room, 888 First Street, NE.,
Washington, DC 20426. The Order may also be viewed on the Commission's
Web site at http://www.ferc.gov, using the eLibrary link. Enter the

docket number excluding the last three digits in the docket number
filed to access the document. Comments, protests, and interventions may
be filed electronically via the Internet in lieu of paper. See, 18 CFR
385.2001(a)(1)(iii) and the instructions on the Commission's Web site
under the ``e-Filing'' link. The Commission strongly encourages
electronic filings.

Magalie R. Salas,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. E6-10800 Filed 7-10-06; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 6717-01-P


[Federal Register: April 29, 2009 (Volume 74, Number 81)]
[Notices]
[Page 19572-19573]
[DOCID:fr29ap09-95]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY

Federal Emergency Management Agency

[Docket ID: FEMA-2009-0001]

Agency Information Collection Activities: Proposed Collection;
Comment Request

AGENCY: Federal Emergency Management Agency, DHS.

ACTION: Notice; 60-day notice and request for comments; new information
collection; OMB No. 1660-NW35; FEMA Form 528-1, NEFRLS Registration;
and FEMA Form 528-2, NEFRLS Search.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Federal Emergency Management Agency, as part of its
continuing effort to reduce paperwork and respondent burden, invites
the general public and other Federal agencies to take this opportunity
to comment on a proposed new information collection. In accordance with
the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995, this Notice seeks comments
concerning the National Emergency Family Registry and Locator System
(NEFRLS) established in accordance with Title VI of the Department of
Homeland Security Appropriations Act of 2007 to help facilitate the
reunification of families displaced due to a major disaster or
emergency

DATES: Comments must be submitted on or before June 29, 2009.

ADDRESSES: To avoid duplicate submissions to the docket, please use
only one of the following means to submit comments:
    (1) Online. Submit comments at http://www.regulations.gov under
docket ID FEMA-2009-0001. Follow the instructions for submitting
comments.
    (2) Mail. Submit written comments to Office of Chief Counsel,
Regulation and Policy Team, DHS/FEMA, 500 C Street, SW., Room 835,
Washington, DC 20472-3100.
    (3) Facsimile. Submit comments to<PHONE_NUMBER>.
    (4) E-mail. Submit comments to<EMAIL_ADDRESS>Include docket
ID FEMA-2009-0001 in the subject line.
    All submissions received must include the agency name and docket
ID. Regardless of the method used for submitting comments or material,
all submissions will be posted, without change, to the Federal
eRulemaking Portal at http://www.regulations.gov, and will include any
personal information you provide. Therefore, submitting this
information makes it public. You may wish to read the Privacy Act
notice that is available on the Privacy and Use Notice link on the
Administration Navigation Bar of http://www.regulations.gov.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Contact Waddy Gonzalez, Mass Care Team
Lead, Individual Assistance Division, Mass Care Unit, at<PHONE_NUMBER>
for additional information. You may contact the Records Management
Branch for copies of the proposed collection of information at
facsimile number<PHONE_NUMBER> or e-mail address: FEMA-Information-
<EMAIL_ADDRESS>
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The Post-Katrina Emergency Management Reform
Act of 2006, in Title VI of the DHS Appropriations Act of 2007, Public
Law 109-295, section 689c, 120 Stat. 1355 at 1451 is the legal basis
for FEMA to provide a National Emergency Family Registry and Locator
System (NEFRLS) to allow adults (including medical patients) that have
been displaced by a Presidentially-declared disaster or emergency to
voluntarily register by submitting personal information to be entered
into a database that could be used by others to help reunify them with
their families.

Collection of Information

    Title: National Emergency Family Registry and Locator System
(NEFRLS).
    Type of Information Collection: New information collection.
    OMB Number: 1660-NW35.
    Form Titles and Numbers: FEMA Form 528-1, NEFRLS Registration; and
FEMA Form 528-2, NEFRLS Search.
    Abstract: NEFRLS is a Web-based system. The information collected
in the NEFRLS will be used to help facilitate

the reunification of family members that have been displaced due to a
major disaster or emergency.
    Affected Public: Individuals or households.
    Estimated Total Annual Burden Hours: 328,366 Hours.

                                                 Table A.12--Estimated Annualized Burden Hours and Costs
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
                                                                                Total
                                                                                No. of                               annual      Avg.     Total annual
          Type of respondent            Form name/form  number      No. of     responses       Avg. burden per        burden     hourly     respondent
                                                                 respondents      per        response  (in hours)      (in     wage rate       cost
                                                                               respondent                             hours)
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
 Individuals or households...........  NEFRLS Registration            42,717            1  .32 (19 minutes).......     13,527     $19.81        $267,970
                                        800/FEMA Form
                                        528-1.
Individuals or households............  NEFRLS Registration            14,239            1  .22 (13 minutes).......      3,085      19.81          61,114
                                        Internet/FEMA Form 528-
                                        1.
¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤                          ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
    Subtotal--Registration...........  ........................       56,956  ...........  .......................  .........  .........  ..............
¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Individuals or households............   NEFRLS Search 800/FEMA Form 528-2.
 Individuals or households...........  NEFRLS Search Internet/       194,846            3  .22 (13 minutes).......    126,650      19.81       2,508,937
                                        FEMA Form 528-2.
¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤                          ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
    Subtotal--Search.................  ........................      389,692  ...........  .......................  .........  .........  ..............
¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤                          ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
        Total........................  ........................      446,648  ...........  .......................    328,366  .........       6,504,931
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

    Estimated Cost: There are no start-up, operational or other costs
associated with this information collection in addition to the burden
hour cost noted in the table above.

Comments

    Comments may be submitted as indicated in the ADDRESSES caption
above. Comments are solicited to (a) evaluate whether the proposed data
collection is necessary for the proper performance of the agency,
including whether the information shall have practical utility; (b)
evaluate the accuracy of the agency's estimate of the burden of the
proposed collection of information, including the validity of the
methodology and assumptions used; (c) enhance the quality, utility, and
clarity of the information to be collected; and (d) minimize the burden
of the collection of information on those who are to respond, including
through the use of appropriate automated, electronic, mechanical, or
other technological collection techniques or other forms of information
technology, e.g., permitting electronic submission of responses.

Larry Gray,
Director, Records Management Division, Office of Management, Federal
Emergency Management Agency, Department of Homeland Security.
[FR Doc. E9-9813 Filed 4-28-09; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 9111-23-P


[Federal Register Volume 78, Number 178 (Friday, September 13, 2013)]
[Notices]
[Page 56696]
[FR Doc No: 2013-22336]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY

[FRL-9900-99-OA]

National Environmental Education Advisory Council

AGENCY: Environmental Protection Agency (EPA).

ACTION: Notice of meeting.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: Under the Federal Advisory Committee Act, EPA gives notice of
a meeting of the National Environmental Education Advisory Council
(NEEAC). The NEEAC was created by Congress to advise, consult with, and
make recommendations to the Administrator of the Environmental
Protection Agency (EPA) on matters related to activities, functions and
policies of EPA under the National Environmental Education Act (the
Act).
    The purpose of this meeting is to discuss specific topics of
relevance for consideration by the council in order to provide advice
and insights to the Agency on environmental education.

DATES: The National Environmental Education Advisory Council will hold
a public meeting on Monday October 7, 2013 and Tuesday October 8, 2013,
from 9:00 a.m. until 5:00 p.m. (Eastern Daylight Time). The meeting
will be held at the Residence Inn by Marriott Baltimore Downtown/Inner
Harbor on, 17 Light Street, Baltimore, Maryland. The meeting will be
held in the Chesapeake Meeting Room 1.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Javier Araujo, Designated Federal
Officer<EMAIL_ADDRESS>202-564-2642, U.S. EPA, Office of
Environmental Education, William Jefferson Clinton North Room 1426,
1200 Pennsylvania Avenue NW., Washington, DC 20460.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Members of the public wishing to gain access
to the teleconference, make brief oral comments, or provide a written
statement to the NEEAC must contact Javier Araujo, Designated Federal
Officer, at<EMAIL_ADDRESS>or<PHONE_NUMBER> by 10 business days
prior to each regularly scheduled meeting.
    Meeting Access: For information on access or services for
individuals with disabilities or to request accommodations please
contact Javier Araujo at<EMAIL_ADDRESS>or<PHONE_NUMBER>,
preferably at least 10 days prior to the meeting, to give EPA as much
time as possible to process your request.

    Dated: August 28, 2013.
Javier Araujo,
Designated Federal Officer, National Environmental Education Advisory
Council.
Stephanie Owens,
Deputy Associate Administrator.
[FR Doc. 2013-22336 Filed 9-12-13; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6560-50-P


[Federal Register Volume 85, Number 245 (Monday, December 21, 2020)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Pages 82939-82944]
[FR Doc No: 2020-28128]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY

40 CFR Part 180

[EPA-HQ-OPP-2019-0233; FRL-10017-30]

2,4-D; Pesticide Tolerances

AGENCY: Environmental Protection Agency (EPA).

ACTION: Final rule.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: This regulation establishes tolerances for residues of 2,4-D
in or on intermediate wheatgrass bran, forage, grain, and straw and
sesame seed. Interregional Research Project Number 4 (IR-4) requested
these tolerances under the Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act
(FFDCA).

DATES: This regulation is effective December 21, 2020. Objections and
requests for hearings must be received on or before February 19, 2021,
and must be filed in accordance with the instructions provided in 40
CFR part 178 (see also Unit I.C. of the SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION).

ADDRESSES: The docket for this action, identified by docket
identification (ID) number EPA-HQ-OPP-2019-0233, is available at http://www.regulations.gov or at the Office of Pesticide Programs Regulatory
Public Docket (OPP Docket) in the Environmental Protection Agency
Docket Center (EPA/DC), West William Jefferson Clinton Bldg., Rm. 3334,
1301 Constitution Ave. NW, Washington, DC 20460-0001. The Public
Reading Room is open from 8:30 a.m. to 4:30 p.m., Monday through
Friday, excluding legal holidays. The telephone number for the Public
Reading Room is<PHONE_NUMBER>, and the telephone number for the OPP
Docket is<PHONE_NUMBER>.
    Due to the public health concerns related to COVID-19, the EPA
Docket Center (EPA/DC) and Reading Room is closed to visitors with
limited exceptions. The staff continues to provide remote customer
service via email, phone, and webform. For the latest status
information on EPA/DC services and docket access, visit https://www.epa.gov/dockets.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Marietta Echeverria, Registration
Division (7505P), Office of Pesticide Programs, Environmental
Protection Agency, 1200 Pennsylvania Ave. NW, Washington, DC 20460-
0001; main telephone number:<PHONE_NUMBER>; email address:
<EMAIL_ADDRESS>
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

I. General Information

A. Does this action apply to me?

    You may be potentially affected by this action if you are an
agricultural producer, food manufacturer, or pesticide manufacturer.
The following list of North American Industrial Classification System
(NAICS) codes is not intended to be exhaustive, but rather provides a
guide to help readers determine whether this document applies to them.
Potentially affected entities may include:
     Crop production (NAICS code 111).
     Animal production (NAICS code 112).
     Food manufacturing (NAICS code 311).
     Pesticide manufacturing (NAICS code 32532).

B. How can I get electronic access to other related information?

    You may access a frequently updated electronic version of EPA's
tolerance regulations at 40 CFR part 180 through the Government
Publishing Office's e-CFR site at http://www.ecfr.gov/cgi-bin/text-idx?&c=ecfr&tpl=/ecfrbrowse/Title40/40tab_02.tpl.

C. How can I file an objection or hearing request?

    Under FFDCA section 408(g), 21 U.S.C. 346a, any person may file an
objection to any aspect of this regulation and may also request a
hearing on those objections. You must file your objection or request a
hearing on this regulation in accordance with the instructions provided
in 40 CFR part 178. To ensure proper receipt by EPA, you must identify
docket ID number EPA-HQ-OPP-2019-0233 in the subject line on the first
page of your submission. All objections and requests for a hearing must
be in writing, and must be received by the Hearing Clerk on or before
February 19, 2021. Addresses for mail and hand delivery of objections
and hearing requests are provided in 40 CFR 178.25(b).
    In addition to filing an objection or hearing request with the
Hearing Clerk as described in 40 CFR part 178, please submit a copy of
the filing (excluding any Confidential Business Information (CBI)) for
inclusion in the public docket. Information not marked confidential
pursuant to 40 CFR part 2 may be disclosed publicly by EPA without
prior notice. Submit the non-CBI copy of your objection or hearing
request, identified by docket ID number EPA-HQ-OPP-2019-0233, by one of
the following methods:
     Federal eRulemaking Portal: http://www.regulations.gov.
Follow the online instructions for submitting comments. Do not submit
electronically any information you consider to be CBI or other
information whose disclosure is restricted by statute.
     Mail: OPP Docket, Environmental Protection Agency Docket
Center (EPA/DC), (28221T), 1200 Pennsylvania Ave. NW, Washington, DC
20460-0001.
     Hand Delivery: To make special arrangements for hand
delivery or delivery of boxed information, please follow the
instructions at http://www.epa.gov/dockets/contacts.html.
    Additional instructions on commenting or visiting the docket, along
with more information about dockets generally, is available at http://www.epa.gov/dockets.

II. Summary of Petitioned-For Tolerance

    In the Federal Register of September 30, 2020 (85 FR 61681) (FRL-
10014-74), EPA issued a document pursuant to FFDCA section 408(d)(3),
21 U.S.C. 346a(d)(3), announcing the filing of pesticide petitions (an
amended PP 9E8745 and PP 0E8848) by IR-4, IR-4 Project Headquarters,
Rutgers, The State University of New Jersey, 500 College Road East,
Suite 201W, Princeton, NJ 08540. This September 30, 2020 Notice
supersedes the previous document the Agency published notifying the
public of the filing of the IR-4 petition PP9E8745 in the Federal
Register of August 30, 2019 (84 FR 45702) (FRL-9998-15).
    The petitions requested that 40 CFR part 180 be amended by
establishing tolerances for residues of 2,4-D in or on the raw
agricultural commodities wheatgrass, intermediate, bran at 4 parts per
million (ppm); wheatgrass, intermediate, grain at 2 ppm; wheatgrass,
intermediate, straw at 50 ppm, and wheatgrass, intermediate, forage at
25 ppm (PP 9E8745) and sesame, seed at 0.05 ppm (PP 0E8848). That
document referenced summaries of the petitions prepared by Nufarm and
PBI Gordon, the registrants, which are

available in the docket, http://www.regulations.gov. There was one
comment received in response to the notice of filing and it was in
support of the petition. Although the petitioner requested a tolerance
for wheatgrass, intermediate, forage at 25 ppm, the available data
indicate that a tolerance of 30 ppm is appropriate; therefore, EPA is
establishing that tolerance at 30 ppm. The remaining tolerances are
being established as requested.

III. Aggregate Risk Assessment and Determination of Safety

    Section 408(b)(2)(A)(i) of FFDCA allows EPA to establish a
tolerance (the legal limit for a pesticide chemical residue in or on a
food) only if EPA determines that the tolerance is ``safe.'' Section
408(b)(2)(A)(ii) of FFDCA defines ``safe'' to mean that ``there is a
reasonable certainty that no harm will result from aggregate exposure
to the pesticide chemical residue, including all anticipated dietary
exposures and all other exposures for which there is reliable
information.'' This includes exposure through drinking water and in
residential settings, but does not include occupational exposure.
Section 408(b)(2)(C) of FFDCA requires EPA to give special
consideration to exposure of infants and children to the pesticide
chemical residue in establishing a tolerance and to ``ensure that there
is a reasonable certainty that no harm will result to infants and
children from aggregate exposure to the pesticide chemical residue . .
..''
    Consistent with FFDCA section 408(b)(2)(D), and the factors
specified in FFDCA section 408(b)(2)(D), EPA has reviewed the available
scientific data and other relevant information in support of this
action. EPA has sufficient data to assess the hazards of and to make a
determination on aggregate exposure for 2,4-D including exposure
resulting from the tolerances established by this action. EPA's
assessment of exposures and risks associated with 2,4-D follows.

A. Toxicological Profile

    EPA has evaluated the available toxicity data and considered its
validity, completeness, and reliability as well as the relationship of
the results of the studies to human risk. EPA has also considered
available information concerning the variability of the sensitivities
of major identifiable subgroups of consumers, including infants and
children.
    The toxicity profile of 2,4-D shows that the principal toxic
effects are changes in the kidney, thyroid, liver, adrenal, eye, and
ovaries/testes in the rat following exposure to 2,4-D via the oral
route at dose levels above the threshold of saturation of renal
clearance; below that level, the kidneys rapidly excrete the chemical
before it has any toxic effects on the body. No systemic toxicity was
observed in rabbits following repeated exposure via the dermal route at
dose levels up to the limit dose. Neurotoxicity was observed in the
acute neurotoxicity study in rats at the high dose. In an extended 1-
generation reproductive toxicity study in rats, reproductive toxicity,
developmental neurotoxicity, and immunotoxicity were not observed, and
the thyroid effects observed at dose levels up to/approaching renal
saturation were considered treatment-related, although not adverse.
Maternal and developmental toxicities were observed only at high dose
levels exceeding the threshold of saturation of renal clearance.
Regarding carcinogenicity, available data showed no statistically
significant tumor response in rats and mice. Moreover, EPA's literature
review found that, overall, there was little substantive evidence to
suggest a clear associative or causal relationship between exposure to
2,4-D and cancer.
    Specific information on the studies received and the nature of the
adverse effects caused by 2,4-D as well as the no-observed-adverse-
effect-level (NOAEL) and the lowest-observed-adverse-effect-level
(LOAEL) from the toxicity studies can be found at http://www.regulations.gov in the document titled ``2,4-D. Second Revision:
Human Health Risk Assessment for Registration Review'' (hereinafter
``2,4-D Human Health Risk Assessment for Registration Review'') in
docket ID number EPA-HQ-OPP-2019-0233.

B. Toxicological Points of Departure/Levels of Concern

    Once a pesticide's toxicological profile is determined, EPA
identifies toxicological points of departure (POD) and levels of
concern to use in evaluating the risk posed by human exposure to the
pesticide. For hazards that have a threshold below which there is no
appreciable risk, the toxicological POD is used as the basis for
derivation of reference values for risk assessment. PODs are developed
based on a careful analysis of the doses in each toxicological study to
determine the dose at which no adverse effects are observed (the NOAEL)
and the lowest dose at which adverse effects of concern are identified
(the LOAEL). Uncertainty/safety factors are used in conjunction with
the POD to calculate a safe exposure level--generally referred to as a
population-adjusted dose (PAD) or a reference dose (RfD)--and a safe
margin of exposure (MOE). For non-threshold risks, the Agency assumes
that any amount of exposure will lead to some degree of risk. Thus, the
Agency estimates risk in terms of the probability of an occurrence of
the adverse effect expected in a lifetime. For more information on the
general principles EPA uses in risk characterization and a complete
description of the risk assessment process, see http://www2.epa.gov/pesticide-science-and-assessing-pesticide-risks/assessing-human-health-risk-pesticide.
    A summary of the toxicological endpoints for 2,4-D used for human
risk assessment can be found in the 2,4-D Human Health Risk Assessment
for Registration Review.

C. Exposure Assessment

    1. Dietary exposure from food and feed uses. In evaluating dietary
exposure to 2,4-D, EPA considered exposure under the petitioned-for
tolerances as well as all existing 2,4-D tolerances in 40 CFR 180.142.
EPA assessed dietary exposures from 2,4-D in food as follows:
    i. Acute exposure. Quantitative acute dietary exposure and risk
assessments are performed for a food-use pesticide, if a toxicological
study has indicated the possibility of an effect of concern occurring
as a result of a 1-day or single exposure.
    Such effects were identified for 2,4-D. In estimating acute dietary
exposure, EPA used 2003-2008 food consumption information from the
United States Department of Agriculture's (USDA's) National Health and
Nutrition Examination Survey, What We Eat in America, (NHANES/WWEIA).
As to residue levels in food, EPA assumed tolerance-level residues,
except for transgenic soybeans and cotton (for which a value higher
than the tolerance was used to account for the 2,4-DCP metabolite), and
100 percent crop treated (PCT) for all commodities, as well as
empirical and default processing factors.
    ii. Chronic exposure. In conducting the chronic dietary exposure
assessment, EPA used the 2003-2008 food consumption data from the
USDA's NHANES/WWEIA. As to residue levels in food, EPA assumed
tolerance-level residues, except for transgenic soybeans and cotton
(for which a value higher than the tolerance was used to account for
the 2,4-DCP metabolite), and 100 percent crop treated (PCT) for all
commodities, as well as empirical and default processing factors.

    iii. Cancer. Based on the data summarized in the 2,4-D Human Health
Risk Assessment for Registration Review in docket ID number EPA-HQ-OPP-
2019-0233, EPA has concluded that 2,4-D is not expected to pose a
cancer risk to humans. Therefore, a dietary exposure assessment for the
purpose of assessing cancer risk is unnecessary.
    iv. Anticipated residue and PCT information. EPA did not use
anticipated residue or PCT information in the dietary assessment for
2,4-D. Tolerance-level residues (except for transgenic soybeans and
cotton, for which a value higher than the tolerance was used to account
for the 2,4-DCP metabolite) and 100 PCT were assumed for all food
commodities.
    2. Dietary exposure from drinking water. The Agency used screening-
level water exposure models in the dietary exposure analysis and risk
assessment for 2,4-D in drinking water. These simulation models take
into account data on the physical, chemical, and fate/transport
characteristics of 2,4-D. Further information regarding EPA drinking
water models used in pesticide exposure assessment can be found at
http://www2.epa.gov/pesticide-science-and-assessing-pesticide-risks/about-water-exposure-models-used-pesticide.
    Based on the Surface Water Concentration Calculator (SWCC),
Pesticide Root Zone Model Ground Water (PRZM GW) model, and monitoring
data, the estimated drinking water concentrations (EDWCs) of 2,4-D for
acute exposures are estimated to be 298 parts per billion (ppb) for
surface water and 14.89 ppb for ground water, and for chronic exposures
are estimated to be 34.5 ppb for surface water and 14.89 ppb for ground
water.
    Modeled estimates of drinking water concentrations were directly
entered into the dietary exposure model. For the acute dietary risk
assessment, the water concentration value of 298 ppb was used to assess
the contribution to drinking water. For the chronic dietary risk
assessment, the water concentration of value 34.5 ppb was used to
assess the contribution to drinking water.
    3. From non-dietary exposure. The term ``residential exposure'' is
used in this document to refer to non-occupational, non-dietary
exposure (e.g., for lawn and garden pest control, indoor pest control,
termiticides, and flea and tick control on pets).
    2,4-D is currently registered for the following uses that could
result in residential exposures: Ornamental turf, including lawns,
parks, sports fields, and golf courses, as well as aquatic uses. EPA
assessed residential exposure using the following assumptions: There is
no potential hazard via the dermal route for 2,4-D; therefore, the
handler assessment included only the inhalation route of exposure.
There are registered 2,4-D products for use in residential sites (e.g.,
lawns and turf) that have been considered in the short-term residential
handler assessment for 2,4-D. As the aquatic use product labels include
PPE requirements, and state that coordination and approval of local and
state authorities and/or permits may be required prior to application,
those applications are assumed to be made only by occupational
applicators.
    There is potential for short-term post-application exposure for
individuals as a result of being in an environment that has been
previously treated with 2,4-D. The quantitative exposure/risk
assessment for residential post-application exposures is based on the
following scenarios:
     Incidental ingestion (i.e., hand-to-mouth, object-to-
mouth, soil ingestion exposure) from contact with treated turf
(children 1 to less than 2 years old only),
     Episodic granular ingestion on treated turf (children 1 to
less than 2 years old only), and
     Incidental ingestion of water during recreational swimming
(both adults and children 3 to less than 6 years old).
    The residential exposure scenario used in the adult and children 3
to less than 6 years aggregate assessments reflects short-term
incidental oral exposure from post-application exposure swimmer
scenario.
    The residential exposure scenario used in the children 1 to less
than 2 years old aggregate assessment reflects short-term hand-to-mouth
exposures from post-application turf scenario (i.e., post-application
exposure to turf applications).
    These scenarios are considered worst-case and are protective of all
other exposure scenarios.
    Further information regarding EPA standard assumptions and generic
inputs for residential exposures may be found at http://www2.epa.gov/pesticide-science-and-assessing-pesticide-risks/standard-operating-procedures-residential-pesticide.
    4. Cumulative effects from substances with a common mechanism of
toxicity. Section 408(b)(2)(D)(v) of FFDCA requires that, when
considering whether to establish, modify, or revoke a tolerance, the
Agency consider ``available information'' concerning the cumulative
effects of a particular pesticide's residues and ``other substances
that have a common mechanism of toxicity.''
    2,4-D is a member of the alkylphenoxy herbicide class of
pesticides. This class also includes MCPA, 2,4-DB, and 2,4-DP. Unlike
other pesticides for which EPA has followed a cumulative risk approach
based on a common mechanism of toxicity, EPA has not made a common
mechanism of toxicity finding as to 2,4-D and any other substances. For
the purposes of this action, therefore, EPA has not assumed that 2,4-D
has a common mechanism of toxicity with other substances.
    For information regarding EPA's efforts to determine which
chemicals have a common mechanism of toxicity and to evaluate the
cumulative effects of such chemicals, see the policy statements
released by EPA's Office of Pesticide Programs concerning common
mechanism determinations and procedures for cumulating effects from
substances found to have a common mechanism on EPA's website at http://www2.epa.gov/pesticide-science-and-assessing-pesticide-risks/cumulative-assessment-risk-pesticides.

D. Safety Factor for Infants and Children

    1. In general. Section 408(b)(2)(C) of FFDCA provides that EPA
shall apply an additional tenfold (10X) margin of safety for infants
and children in the case of threshold effects to account for prenatal
and postnatal toxicity and the completeness of the database on toxicity
and exposure unless EPA determines based on reliable data that a
different margin of safety will be safe for infants and children. This
additional margin of safety is commonly referred to as the FQPA Safety
Factor (SF). In applying this provision, EPA either retains the default
value of 10X, or uses a different additional safety factor when
reliable data available to EPA support the choice of a different
factor.
    2. Prenatal and postnatal sensitivity. 2,4-D has been evaluated for
potential developmental effects in the rat and rabbit. There is no
evidence of increased susceptibility following in utero exposure to
2,4-D in the rabbit developmental toxicity study or following in utero
and/or pre-/post-natal exposure in the rat extended 1-generation
reproduction toxicity study. Maternal toxicity in the rabbit included
decreased body weight gain, clinical signs of toxicity (decreased motor
activity, ataxia, loss of righting reflex, extremities cold to the
touch) and developmental toxicity includes abortions.
    The rat developmental toxicity study and the rat 2-generation
reproductive study indicate increased susceptibility

following in utero exposure to 2,4-D in the rat developmental toxicity
study and/or pre-/post-natal exposure in the reproductive study. In the
former, maternal toxicity included decreased body weight gains at the
same dose level where developmental effects (occurrence of skeletal
malformations) occurred; in the latter, maternal toxicity included
decreased body weight gains at the same dose level where reduced
viability of the F1 pups was observed. In both the rat developmental
study and the rat 2-generation reproduction study, the toxicity was
observed at dose levels that exceed renal saturation. Because the
toxicity was observed at those levels, EPA expects that had an
examination of the kidney been done on the maternal animals in these
studies, kidney effects would have been revealed at doses lower than
where the developmental effects had occurred; therefore, the study
findings are not considered evidence of real susceptibility.
    3. Conclusion. EPA has determined that reliable data show the
safety of infants and children would be adequately protected if the
FQPA SF were reduced to 1x. That decision is based on the following
findings:
    i. The toxicity database for 2,4-D is complete.
    ii. Evidence of neurotoxicity was observed in the acute
neurotoxicity study in rats, as evidenced by an increase in the
incidence of in-coordination and slight gait abnormalities (forepaw
flexing or knuckling) during the Functional Operational Battery
assessment at the high dose in both sexes. In the subchronic
neurotoxicity study, relative forelimb grip strength was significantly
increased in rats of both sexes at the high-dose level, although there
was no treatment-related change in absolute grip strength. Clinical
signs of neurotoxicity (decreased motor activity, ataxia, loss of
righting reflex, extremities cold to the touch) were observed in
maternal rabbits in the developmental toxicity study. Developmental
neurotoxicity was not observed in the developmental neurotoxicity
cohort of the Extended One Generation Reproductive Toxicity study in
rats. Neuropathological effects were not observed in any study.
    iii. There is evidence of increased susceptibility following in
utero exposure to 2,4-D in the rat developmental toxicity study and
following in utero and/or pre-/post-natal exposure in the rat 2-
generation reproduction study at dose levels that exceed renal
saturation. There is no evidence of increased susceptibility following
in utero exposure to 2,4-D in the rabbit developmental toxicity study
or following in utero and/or pre-/post-natal exposure in the rat
extended 1-generation reproduction toxicity study. Despite this
conclusion, there is no residual uncertainty concerning the potential
susceptibility of infants and children to effects of 2,4-D
necessitating the retention of the 10X FQPA safety factor. There are no
data gaps in the toxicology database, and the available reliable data
provide clearly established NOAELs and LOAELs for the population of
concern and the points of departure (POD) that are protective of
susceptibility. Consequently, there is no need to retain the 10X FQPA
safety factor to protect infants and children.
    iv. There are no residual uncertainties identified in the exposure
databases. The dietary exposure estimates are unrefined and reflect
primarily tolerance-level residues in food and 100 PCT. EPA made
conservative (protective) assumptions in the ground and surface water
modeling used to assess exposure to 2,4-D in drinking water. EPA used
similarly conservative assumptions to assess post-application exposure
of children as well as incidental oral exposure of toddlers. These
assessments will not underestimate the exposure and risks posed by 2,4-
D.

E. Aggregate Risks and Determination of Safety

    EPA determines whether acute and chronic dietary pesticide
exposures are safe by comparing aggregate exposure estimates to the
acute PAD (aPAD) and chronic PAD (cPAD). For linear cancer risks, EPA
calculates the lifetime probability of acquiring cancer given the
estimated aggregate exposure. Short-, intermediate-, and chronic-term
risks are evaluated by comparing the estimated aggregate food, water,
and residential exposure to the appropriate PODs to ensure that an
adequate MOE exists.
    1. Acute risk. Using the exposure assumptions discussed in this
unit for acute exposure, the acute dietary exposure from food and water
to 2,4-D will occupy 23% of the aPAD for children 1-2 years old, the
population group receiving the greatest exposure.
    2. Chronic risk. Using the exposure assumptions described in this
unit for chronic exposure, EPA has concluded that chronic exposure to
2,4-D from food and water will utilize 20% of the cPAD for children 1
to 2 years old, the population group receiving the greatest exposure.
Based on the explanation in Unit III.C.3., regarding residential use
patterns, chronic residential exposure to residues of 2,4-D is not
expected.
    3. Short-term risk. Short-term aggregate exposure takes into
account short-term residential exposure plus chronic exposure to food
and water (considered to be a background exposure level).
    2,4-D is currently registered for uses that could result in short-
term residential exposure, and the Agency has determined that it is
appropriate to aggregate chronic exposure through food and water with
short-term residential exposures to 2,4-D.
    Using the exposure assumptions described in this unit for short-
term exposures, EPA has concluded the combined short-term food, water,
and residential exposures result in aggregate MOEs of 2000 for adults
and 280 for children. Because EPA's level of concern for 2,4-D is a MOE
of 100 or below, these MOEs are not of concern.
    4. Intermediate-term risk. Intermediate-term aggregate exposure
takes into account intermediate-term residential exposure plus chronic
exposure to food and water (considered to be a background exposure
level).
    An intermediate-term adverse effect was identified; however, 2,4-D
is not registered for any use patterns that would result in
intermediate-term residential exposure. Intermediate-term risk is
assessed based on intermediate-term residential exposure plus chronic
dietary exposure. Because there is no intermediate-term residential
exposure and chronic dietary exposure has already been assessed under
the appropriately protective cPAD (which is at least as protective as
the POD used to assess intermediate-term risk), no further assessment
of intermediate-term risk is necessary, and EPA relies on the chronic
dietary risk assessment for evaluating intermediate-term risk for 2,4-
D.
    5. Aggregate cancer risk for U.S. population. As discussed above,
EPA has concluded that 2,4-D will not pose a cancer risk.
    6. Determination of safety. Based on these risk assessments, EPA
concludes that there is a reasonable certainty that no harm will result
to the general population, or to infants and children from aggregate
exposure to 2,4-D residues.

IV. Other Considerations

A. Analytical Enforcement Methodology

    Adequate analytical methods are available for data collection and
the enforcement of plant commodity tolerances. An adequate Gas
Chromatography/Electron Capture

Detector (GC/ECD) enforcement method for plants (designated as EN-CAS
Method No. ENC-2/93) was submitted, which has been independently
validated and radiovalidated. An enforcement method was submitted for
determination of 2,4-D in livestock commodities, which has been
adequately radiovalidated. The methods have been submitted to FDA for
inclusion in PAM II. The 10/1997 edition of FDA PAM Volume I, Appendix
I indicates that 2,4-D is partially recovered (50-80%) using
Multiresidue Methods Section 402 E1 and 402 E2.
    For multiresidue method analysis, 2,4-D is documented to be well-
recovered through the QuEChERS (Quick, Easy, Cheap, Effective, Rugged,
and Safe) streamlined extraction method.
    The methods may be requested from: Chief, Analytical Chemistry
Branch, Environmental Science Center, 701 Mapes Rd., Ft. Meade, MD
20755-5350; telephone number:<PHONE_NUMBER>; email address:
<EMAIL_ADDRESS>
B. International Residue Limits

    In making its tolerance decisions, EPA seeks to harmonize U.S.
tolerances with international standards whenever possible, consistent
with U.S. food safety standards and agricultural practices. EPA
considers the international maximum residue limits (MRLs) established
by the Codex Alimentarius Commission (Codex), as required by FFDCA
section 408(b)(4).
    The Codex has not established any MRLs for 2,4-D on intermediate
wheatgrass raw agricultural commodities or sesame seed.

C. Response to Comments

    There was one comment received in response to the notice of filing
and it was in support of the petition.

V. Conclusion

    Therefore, tolerances are established for residues of 2,4-D, in or
on sesame, seed at 0.05 ppm; wheatgrass, intermediate, bran at 4 ppm;
wheatgrass, intermediate, forage at 30 ppm; wheatgrass, intermediate,
grain at 2 ppm; and wheatgrass, intermediate, straw at 50 ppm.

VI. Statutory and Executive Order Reviews

    This action establishes tolerances under FFDCA section 408(d) in
response to a petition submitted to the Agency. The Office of
Management and Budget (OMB) has exempted these types of actions from
review under Executive Order 12866, entitled ``Regulatory Planning and
Review'' (58 FR 51735, October 4, 1993). Because this action has been
exempted from review under Executive Order 12866, this action is not
subject to Executive Order 13211, entitled ``Actions Concerning
Regulations That Significantly Affect Energy Supply, Distribution, or
Use'' (66 FR 28355, May 22, 2001) or Executive Order 13045, entitled
``Protection of Children from Environmental Health Risks and Safety
Risks'' (62 FR 19885, April 23, 1997), nor is it considered a
regulatory action under Executive Order 13771, entitled ``Reducing
Regulations and Controlling Regulatory Costs'' (82 FR 9339, February 3,
2017). This action does not contain any information collections subject
to OMB approval under the Paperwork Reduction Act (PRA) (44 U.S.C. 3501
et seq.), nor does it require any special considerations under
Executive Order 12898, entitled ``Federal Actions to Address
Environmental Justice in Minority Populations and Low-Income
Populations'' (59 FR 7629, February 16, 1994).
    Since tolerances and exemptions that are established on the basis
of a petition under FFDCA section 408(d), such as the tolerances in
this final rule, do not require the issuance of a proposed rule, the
requirements of the Regulatory Flexibility Act (RFA) (5 U.S.C. 601 et
seq.), do not apply.
    This action directly regulates growers, food processors, food
handlers, and food retailers, not States or tribes, nor does this
action alter the relationships or distribution of power and
responsibilities established by Congress in the preemption provisions
of FFDCA section 408(n)(4). As such, the Agency has determined that
this action will not have a substantial direct effect on States or
Tribal Governments, on the relationship between the National Government
and the States or Tribal Governments, or on the distribution of power
and responsibilities among the various levels of government or between
the Federal Government and Indian Tribes. Thus, the Agency has
determined that Executive Order 13132, entitled ``Federalism'' (64 FR
43255, August 10, 1999) and Executive Order 13175, entitled
``Consultation and Coordination with Indian Tribal Governments'' (65 FR
67249, November 9, 2000) do not apply to this action. In addition, this
action does not impose any enforceable duty or contain any unfunded
mandate as described under Title II of the Unfunded Mandates Reform Act
(UMRA) (2 U.S.C. 1501 et seq.).
    This action does not involve any technical standards that would
require Agency consideration of voluntary consensus standards pursuant
to section 12(d) of the National Technology Transfer and Advancement
Act (NTTAA) (15 U.S.C. 272 note).

VII. Congressional Review Act

    Pursuant to the Congressional Review Act (5 U.S.C. 801 et seq.),
EPA will submit a report containing this rule and other required
information to the U.S. Senate, the U.S. House of Representatives, and
the Comptroller General of the United States prior to publication of
the rule in the Federal Register. This action is not a ``major rule''
as defined by 5 U.S.C. 804(2).

List of Subjects in 40 CFR Part 180

    Environmental protection, Administrative practice and procedure,
Agricultural commodities, Pesticides and pests, Reporting and
recordkeeping requirements.

    Dated: December 4, 2020.
Marietta Echeverria,
Acting Director, Registration Division, Office of Pesticide Programs.

    Therefore, for the reasons stated in the preamble, EPA is amending
40 CFR chapter I as follows:

PART 180--TOLERANCES AND EXEMPTIONS FOR PESTICIDE CHEMICAL RESIDUES
IN FOOD

0
1. The authority citation for part 180 continues to read as follows:

    Authority:  21 U.S.C. 321(q), 346a and 371.

0
2. In Sec.  180.142 amend paragraph (a) by designating the table and
adding, in alphabetical order, in newly designated Table 1 to paragraph
(a) the entries ``Sesame, seed''; ``Wheatgrass, intermediate, bran'';
``Wheatgrass, intermediate, forage''; ``Wheatgrass, intermediate,
grain''; and ``Wheatgrass, intermediate, straw'' to read as follows:

Sec.  180.142  2,4-D; tolerances for residues.

    (a) * * *

                        Table 1 to Paragraph (a)
------------------------------------------------------------------------
                                                             Parts per
                        Commodity                             million
------------------------------------------------------------------------

                                * * * * *
Sesame, seed............................................            0.05

                                * * * * *
Wheatgrass, intermediate, bran..........................               4
Wheatgrass, intermediate, forage........................              30
Wheatgrass, intermediate, grain.........................               2

Wheatgrass, intermediate, straw.........................              50
------------------------------------------------------------------------

* * * * *
[FR Doc. 2020-28128 Filed 12-17-20; 11:15 am]
BILLING CODE 6560-50-P


[Federal Register Volume 82, Number 138 (Thursday, July 20, 2017)]
[Notices]
[Pages 33492-33493]
[FR Doc No: 2017-15248]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission

Combined Notice of Filings

    Take notice that the Commission has received the following Natural
Gas Pipeline Rate and Refund Report filings:

Filings Instituting Proceedings

    Docket Numbers: RP17-808-000.
    Applicants: Algonquin Gas Transmission, LLC.
    Description: Algonquin Gas Transmission, LLC--AFT-E Answer to
Protests, Docket No. RP17-808.
    Filed Date: 6/29/17.
    Accession Number: 20170629-5210.
    Comments Due: 5 p.m. ET 7/11/17.

    Docket Numbers: RP17-858-000.
    Applicants: Algonquin Gas Transmission, LLC.
    Description: Algonquin Gas Transmission, LLC submits tariff filing
per 154.204: Negotiated Rates--US Gas to Macquarie 794260 & 794261 to
be effective 7/1/2017.
    Filed Date: 6/29/17.
    Accession Number: 20170629-5034.
    Comments Due: 5 p.m. ET 7/11/17.

    Docket Numbers: RP17-859-000.
    Applicants: Iroquois Gas Transmission System, L.P.
    Description: Iroquois Gas Transmission System, L.P. submits tariff
filing per 154.204: 06/29/17 Negotiated Rates--ENI Trading & Shipping
(RTS) 7825-02 to be effective 7/1/2017.
    Filed Date: 6/29/17.
    Accession Number: 20170629-5043.
    Comments Due: 5 p.m. ET 7/11/17.

    Docket Numbers: RP17-861-000.
    Applicants: Texas Gas Transmission, LLC.
    Description: Texas Gas Transmission, LLC submits tariff filing per
154.204: Cap Rel Neg Rate Agmts (RE Gas 35433, 34955 to BP 36398,
36399) to be effective 7/1/2017.
    Filed Date: 6/29/17.
    Accession Number: 20170629-5111.
    Comments Due: 5 p.m. ET 7/11/17.

    Docket Numbers: RP17-862-000.
    Applicants: Gulf South Pipeline Company, LP.
    Description: Gulf South Pipeline Company, LP submits tariff filing
per 154.204: Cap Rel Neg Rate Agmts (Atlanta 8438 to various eff 7-1-
17) to be effective 7/1/2017.
    Filed Date: 6/29/17.
    Accession Number: 20170629-5115.
    Comments Due: 5 p.m. ET 7/11/17.

    Docket Numbers: RP17-863-000.
    Applicants: Gulf South Pipeline Company, LP.
    Description: Gulf South Pipeline Company, LP submits tariff filing
per 154.204: Cap Rel Neg Rate Agmt (PH 41455 to Texla 48365) to be
effective 7/1/2017.
    Filed Date: 6/29/17.
    Accession Number: 20170629-5117.
    Comments Due: 5 p.m. ET 7/11/17.

    Docket Numbers: RP17-864-000.
    Applicants: Gulf South Pipeline Company, LP.
    Description: Gulf South Pipeline Company, LP submits tariff filing
per 154.204: Remove Expiring Agmts from the Tariff to be effective 7/1/
2017.
    Filed Date: 6/29/17.
    Accession Number: 20170629-5120.
    Comments Due: 5 p.m. ET 7/11/17.

    Docket Numbers: RP17-865-000.
    Applicants: Texas Eastern Transmission, LP.
    Description: Texas Eastern Transmission, LP submits tariff filing
per 154.204: Gulf Markets Project--Cameron Non-Conforming K911327 to be
effective 8/1/2017.
    Filed Date: 6/29/17.
    Accession Number: 20170629-5137.
    Comments Due: 5 p.m. ET 7/11/17.

    Docket Numbers: RP17-866-000.
    Applicants: Natural Gas Pipeline Company of America.
    Description: Natural Gas Pipeline Company of America LLC submits
tariff filing per 154.204: Amendment Negotiated Rate Filing--Mercuria
Energy America to be effective 6/29/2017.
    Filed Date: 6/29/17.
    Accession Number: 20170629-5165.
    Comments Due: 5 p.m. ET 7/11/17.

    Docket Numbers: RP17-867-000.
    Applicants: Texas Eastern Transmission, LP.
    Description: Texas Eastern Transmission, LP submits tariff filing
per 154.204: Lebanon Extension Negotiated Rates--Gulfport/City of
Hamilton to be effective 8/1/2017.
    Filed Date: 6/29/17.
    Accession Number: 20170629-5177.
    Comments Due: 5 p.m. ET 7/11/17.

    Docket Numbers: RP17-868-000.
    Applicants: Texas Eastern Transmission, LP.
    Description: Texas Eastern Transmission, LP submits tariff filing
per 154.403: EPC AUG 2017 FILING to be effective 8/1/2017.
    Filed Date: 6/29/17.
    Accession Number: 20170629-5190.
    Comments Due: 5 p.m. ET 7/11/17.

    Docket Numbers: RP17-869-000.
    Applicants: Texas Eastern Transmission, LP.
    Description: Texas Eastern Transmission, LP submits tariff filing
per 154.203: Lebanon Extension Tariff Compliance Filing to be effective
8/1/2017.
    Filed Date: 6/29/17.
    Accession Number: 20170629-5215.
    Comments Due: 5 p.m. ET 7/11/17.

    Docket Numbers: RP17-870-000.
    Applicants: Tennessee Gas Pipeline Company, L.L.C.
    Description: Tennessee Gas Pipeline Company, L.L.C. submits tariff
filing per 154.204: Volume No. 2--Cameron LNG, L.L.C Non-Conforming FT-
A to be effective 8/1/2017.
    Filed Date: 6/29/17.
    Accession Number: 20170629-5223.
    Comments Due: 5 p.m. ET 7/11/17.

    Docket Numbers: RP17-879-000.
    Applicants: Iroquois Gas Transmission System, L.P.
    Description: Measurement Variance/Fuel Use Factors of Iroquois Gas
Transmission System, L.P. under RP17-879.
    Filed Date: 6/29/17.
    Accession Number: 20170629-5257.
    Comments Due: 5 p.m. ET 7/11/17.

    Docket Numbers: RP88-67-000.
    Applicants: Texas Eastern Transmission, LP.
    Description: Texas Eastern Transmission, LP submits the audit
report and related work papers of the independent auditor respecting
the costs & recoveries under the Settlement for Year 26 & Year 27
(partial period), the most recently completed annual period under the
S.
    Filed Date: 6/29/17.
    Accession Number: 20170629-5131.
    Comments Due: 5 p.m. ET 7/11/17.

    Docket Numbers: RP17-871-000.
    Applicants: NGO Transmission, Inc.
    Description: NGO Transmission, Inc. submits tariff filing per
154.204:

Ministerial Filing to Update Preliminary Statement to be effective 8/1/
2017.
    Filed Date: 6/30/17.
    Accession Number: 20170630-5060.
    Comments Due: 5 p.m. ET 7/12/17.

    Docket Numbers: RP17-872-000.
    Applicants: Texas Gas Transmission, LLC.
    Description: Texas Gas Transmission, LLC submits tariff filing per
154.204: Cap Rel Neg Rate Agmt (Jay-Bee 34446 to MacQuarie 36400) to be
effective 7/1/2017.
    Filed Date: 6/30/17.
    Accession Number: 20170630-5063.
    Comments Due: 5 p.m. ET 7/12/17.

    Docket Numbers: RP17-873-000.
    Applicants: Texas Gas Transmission, LLC.
    Description: Texas Gas Transmission, LLC submits tariff filing per
154.204: Cap Rel Neg Rate Agmt (Gulfport 35446 to BP 36411) to be
effective 7/1/2017.
    Filed Date: 6/30/17.
    Accession Number: 20170630-5064.
    Comments Due: 5 p.m. ET 7/12/17.

    Docket Numbers: RP17-874-000.
    Applicants: Rockies Express Pipeline LLC.
    Description: Rockies Express Pipeline LLC submits tariff filing per
154.204: Administrative Updates to FERC Gas Tariff to be effective 8/1/
2017.
    Filed Date: 6/30/17.
    Accession Number: 20170630-5081.
    Comments Due: 5 p.m. ET 7/12/17.

    Docket Numbers: RP17-875-000.
    Applicants: WBI Energy Transmission, Inc.
    Description: WBI Energy Transmission, Inc. submits tariff filing
per 154.204: 2017 Section 46 Removal--Nomination Aggregation to be
effective 7/31/2017.
    Filed Date: 6/30/17.
    Accession Number: 20170630-5082.
    Comments Due: 5 p.m. ET 7/12/17.

    Docket Numbers: RP17-876-000.
    Applicants: El Paso Natural Gas Company, L.L.C.
    Description: El Paso Natural Gas Company, L.L.C. submits tariff
filing per 154.601: Negotiated Rate Agreement Update Filing (WPX July
2017) to be effective 7/1/2017.
    Filed Date: 6/30/17.
    Accession Number: 20170630-5087.
    Comments Due: 5 p.m. ET 7/12/17.

    Docket Numbers: RP17-877-000.
    Applicants: Southern Star Central Gas Pipeline, Inc.
    Description: Southern Star Central Gas Pipeline, Inc. submits
tariff filing per 154.204: Vol. 2 Negotiated and Non-Conforming
Flexible Park & Loan--Tenaska--Amendment to be effective 7/1/2017.
    Filed Date: 6/30/17.
    Accession Number: 20170630-5093.
    Comments Due: 5 p.m. ET 7/12/17.

    Docket Numbers: RP17-878-000.
    Applicants: Transcontinental Gas Pipe Line Company.
    Description: Transcontinental Gas Pipe Line Company, LLC submits
tariff filing per 154.203: Texas Eastern OFO Penalty Sharing Report
(Rate Schedule S-2) to be effective N/A.
    Filed Date: 6/30/17.
    Accession Number: 20170630-5102.
    Comments Due: 5 p.m. ET 7/12/17.

    Docket Numbers: RP17-880-000.
    Applicants: Dauphin Island Gathering Partners.
    Description: Dauphin Island Gathering Partners submits tariff
filing per 154.204: Negotiated Rate Filing 7-1-2017 to be effective 7/
1/2017.
    Filed Date: 6/30/17.
    Accession Number: 20170630-5141.
    Comments Due: 5 p.m. ET 7/12/17.

    Docket Numbers: RP17-881-000.
    Applicants: Transcontinental Gas Pipe Line Company.
    Description: Transcontinental Gas Pipe Line Company, LLC submits
tariff filing per 154.204: FOS--FT--Proj Facilities Effective Date to
be effective 7/31/2017.
    Filed Date: 6/30/17.
    Accession Number: 20170630-5147.
    Comments Due: 5 p.m. ET 7/12/17.

    Docket Numbers: RP17-882-000.
    Applicants: Northern Natural Gas Company.
    Description: Northern Natural Gas Company submits tariff filing per
154.204: 20170630 Negotiated Rate to be effective 7/1/2017.
    Filed Date: 6/30/17.
    Accession Number: 20170630-5196.
    Comments Due: 5 p.m. ET 7/12/17.

    Docket Numbers: RP17-883-000.
    Applicants: Transcontinental Gas Pipe Line Company.
    Description: Transcontinental Gas Pipe Line Company, LLC submits
tariff filing per 154.204: Non-Conforming Agreements_Dalton to be
effective 8/1/2017.
    Filed Date: 6/30/17.
    Accession Number: 20170630-5200.
    Comments Due: 5 p.m. ET 7/12/17.

    Docket Numbers: RP17-884-000.
    Applicants: Trailblazer Pipeline Company LLC.
    Description: Trailblazer Pipeline Company LLC submits tariff filing
per 154.204: Neg Rate 2017-06-30 TIGT, Shell to be effective 7/1/2017.
    Filed Date: 6/30/17.
    Accession Number: 20170630-5264.
    Comments Due: 5 p.m. ET 7/12/17.

    Docket Numbers: RP17-889-000.
    Applicants: East Tennessee Natural Gas, LLC.
    Description: East Tennessee Natural Gas, LLC submits tariff filing
per 154.204: PAL FOSA Evergreen Cleanup to be effective 8/6/2017.
    Filed Date: 7/6/17.
    Accession Number: 20170706-5134.
    Comments Due: 5 p.m. ET 7/18/17.

    Docket Numbers: RP17-890-000.
    Applicants: Alliance Pipeline L.P.
    Description: Alliance Pipeline L.P. submits tariff filing per
154.204: Negotiated Rate PAL 2017-07 (Mieco) to be effective 7/7/2017.
    Filed Date: 7/6/17.
    Accession Number: 20170706-5152.
    Comments Due: 5 p.m. ET 7/18/17.

    Docket Numbers: RP17-891-000.
    Applicants: Dominion Energy Transmission, Inc.
    Description: Dominion Energy Transmission, Inc. submits tariff
filing per 154.203: DETI--2017 Overrun and Penalty Revenue Distribution
to be effective N/A.
    Filed Date: 7/7/17.
    Accession Number: 20170707-5015.
    Comments Due: 5 p.m. ET 7/19/17.

    The filings are accessible in the Commission's eLibrary system by
clicking on the links or querying the docket number.
    Any person desiring to intervene or protest in any of the above
proceedings must file in accordance with Rules 211 and 214 of the
Commission's Regulations (18 CFR 385.211 and Sec.  385.214) on or
before 5:00 p.m. Eastern time on the specified comment date. Protests
may be considered, but intervention is necessary to become a party to
the proceeding.
    eFiling is encouraged. More detailed information relating to filing
requirements, interventions, protests, service, and qualifying
facilities filings can be found at: http://www.ferc.gov/docs-filing/efiling/filing-req.pdf. For other information, call<PHONE_NUMBER>
(toll free). For TTY, call<PHONE_NUMBER>.

    Dated: July 7, 2017.
 Kimberly D. Bose,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2017-15248 Filed 7-19-17; 8:45 am]
 BILLING CODE 6717-01-P


[Federal Register Volume 82, Number 86 (Friday, May 5, 2017)]
[Notices]
[Pages 21225-21226]
[FR Doc No: 2017-09104]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission

[Docket No. Cp17-9-000]

ANR Pipeline Company; Notice of Availability of the Environmental
Assessment for the Proposed Wisconsin South Expansion Project

    The staff of the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission (Commission
or FERC) prepared this environmental assessment (EA) to assess the
environmental effects of the Wisconsin South Expansion Project
(Project) involving replacement and expansion of existing aboveground
facilities by ANR Pipeline Company (ANR) in the area west and southwest
of Lake Michigan. The Project would enable ANR to expand delivery by
230,950 dekatherm per day (Dth/d) into the Northern Illinois and
Wisconsin market areas to meet growing natural gas demand.
    The EA assesses the potential environmental effects of the
construction and operation of the proposed Project in accordance with
the requirements of the National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA). The
FERC staff concludes that approval of the proposed Project, with
appropriate mitigating measures, would not constitute a major federal
action significantly affecting the quality of the human environment.
    ANR proposes to install one new 6,130-horsepower (HP) Solar Centaur
50 compressor unit at ANR's existing Sandwich Compressor Station in
Kendall County, Illinois; increase capacity of the existing Hampshire
Meter Station in Kane County, Illinois from the current 320 million
cubic feet per day (MMCFD) to 500 MMCFD; abandon by removal the
existing 0.54-mile-long 16-inch-diameter Line 332 Lateral located in
Kane County, Illinois, and replaced in the same ditch with a new 24-
inch-diameter pipeline to increase flow capacity from the Hampshire
Meter Station to Nicor; increase the capacity of ANR's existing Tiffany
East Meter Station in Rock County, Wisconsin from the current 118 MMCFD
to 237 MMCFD; and re-stage an existing Saturn 10 turbine compressor
unit at ANR's Kewaskum Compressor Station in Sheboygan County,
Wisconsin.
    The FERC staff mailed copies of the EA to Federal, State, and local
government representatives and agencies; elected officials;
environmental and public interest groups; Native American tribes;
potentially affected landowners and other interested individuals and
groups; newspapers and libraries in the project area; and parties to
this proceeding. In addition, the EA is available for public viewing on
the FERC's Web site (www.ferc.gov) using the eLibrary link. A limited
number of copies of the EA are available for distribution and public
inspection at:

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission, Public Reference Room, 888
First Street NE., Room 2A, Washington, DC 20426,<PHONE_NUMBER>

    Any person wishing to comment on the EA may do so. Your comments
should focus on the potential environmental effects, reasonable
alternatives, and measures to avoid or lessen environmental impacts.
The more

specific your comments, the more useful they will be. To ensure that
the Commission has the opportunity to consider your comments prior to
making its decision on this Project, it is important that we receive
your comments in Washington, DC on or before May 30, 2017.
    For your convenience, there are three methods which you can use to
file your comments to the Commission. In all instances, please
reference the project docket numbers (CP17-9-000) with your submission.
The Commission encourages electronic filing of comments and has expert
staff available to assist you at<PHONE_NUMBER> or
<EMAIL_ADDRESS>    (1) You may file your comments electronically using the eComment
feature on the Commission's Web site (www.ferc.gov) under the link to
Documents and Filings. This is an easy method for submitting brief,
text-only comments on a project;
    (2) You may also file your comments electronically using the
eFiling feature on the Commission's Web site (www.ferc.gov) under the
link to Documents and Filings. With eFiling, you can provide comments
in a variety of formats by attaching them as a file with your
submission. New eFiling users must first create an account by clicking
on ``eRegister.'' You must select the type of filing you are making. If
you are filing a comment on a particular project, please select
``Comment on a Filing''; or
    (3) You may file a paper copy of your comments by mailing them to
the following address:

Kimberly D. Bose, Secretary, Federal Energy Regulatory Commission,
888 First St. NE., Room 1A, Washington, DC 20426

    Any person seeking to become a party to the proceeding must file a
motion to intervene pursuant to Rule 214 of the Commission's Rules of
Practice and Procedures (18 CFR 385.214).\1\ Only intervenors have the
right to seek rehearing of the Commission's decision. The Commission
grants affected landowners and others with environmental concerns
intervenor status upon showing good cause by stating that they have a
clear and direct interest in this proceeding which no other party can
adequately represent. Simply filing environmental comments will not
give you intervenor status, but you do not need intervenor status to
have your comments considered.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \1\ See the previous discussion on the methods for filing
comments.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    Additional information about the Project is available from the
Commission's Office of External Affairs, at (866) 208-FERC, or on the
FERC Web site (www.ferc.gov) using the eLibrary link. Click on the
eLibrary link, click on ``General Search,'' and enter the docket number
excluding the last three digits in the Docket Number field (i.e., CP17-
9-000). Be sure you have selected an appropriate date range. For
assistance, please contact FERC Online Support at
<EMAIL_ADDRESS>or toll free at<PHONE_NUMBER>, or for TTY,
contact<PHONE_NUMBER>. The eLibrary link also provides access to the
texts of formal documents issued by the Commission, such as orders,
notices, and rulemakings.
    In addition, the Commission now offers a free service called
eSubscription which allows you to keep track of all formal issuances
and submittals in specific dockets. This can reduce the amount of time
you spend researching proceedings by automatically providing you with
notification of these filings, document summaries and direct links to
the documents. Go to www.ferc.gov/esubscribenow.htm.

    Dated: April 27, 2017.
Kimberly D. Bose,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2017-09104 Filed 5-4-17; 8:45 am]
 BILLING CODE 6717-01-P


[Federal Register Volume 78, Number 174 (Monday, September 9, 2013)]
[Notices]
[Page 55134]
[FR Doc No: 2013-21970]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

[File No. 500-1]

China Cablecom Holdings Ltd., Order of Suspension of Trading

September 5, 2013.
    It appears to the Securities and Exchange Commission that there is
a lack of current and accurate information concerning the securities of
China Cablecom Holdings Ltd. (n/k/a China Cablecom Ltd.) because it has
not filed any periodic reports since the period ended December 31,
2010.
    The Commission is of the opinion that the public interest and the
protection of investors require a suspension of trading in the
securities of the above-listed company. Therefore, it is ordered,
pursuant to Section 12(k) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, that
trading in the securities of the above-listed company is suspended for
the period from 9:30 a.m. EDT on September 5, 2013, through 11:59 p.m.
EDT on September 18, 2013.

    By the Commission.
Jill M. Peterson,
Assistant Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2013-21970 Filed 9-5-13; 4:15 pm]
BILLING CODE 8011-01-P


[Federal Register: August 11, 2008 (Volume 73, Number 155)]
[Notices]
[Page 46636]
[DOCID:fr11au08-87]

=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY

Federal Emergency Management Agency

[FEMA-1771-DR]

Illinois Amendment No. 6 to Notice of a Major Disaster
Declaration

AGENCY: Federal Emergency Management Agency, DHS.

ACTION: Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: This notice amends the notice of a major disaster declaration
for the State of Illinois (FEMA-1771-DR), dated June 24, 2008, and
related determinations.

DATES: Effective Date: July 30, 2008.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Peggy Miller, Disaster Assistance
Directorate, Federal Emergency Management Agency, 500 C Street, SW.,
Washington, DC 20472,<PHONE_NUMBER>.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The notice of a major disaster declaration
for the State of Illinois is hereby amended to include the following
area among those areas determined to have been adversely affected by
the catastrophe declared a major disaster by the President in his
declaration of June 24, 2008.

    Greene County for Public Assistance.

    The following Catalog of Federal Domestic Assistance Numbers
(CFDA) are to be used for reporting and drawing funds: 97.030,
Community Disaster Loans; 97.031, Cora Brown Fund; 97.032, Crisis
Counseling; 97.033, Disaster Legal Services; 97.034, Disaster
Unemployment Assistance (DUA); 97.046, Fire Management Assistance
Grant; 97.048, Disaster Housing Assistance to Individuals and
Households In Presidential Declared Disaster Areas; 97.049,
Presidential Declared Disaster Assistance--Disaster Housing
Operations for Individuals and Households; 97.050, Presidential
Declared Disaster Assistance to Individuals and Households--Other
Needs; 97.036, Disaster Grants--Public Assistance (Presidentially
Declared Disasters); 97.039, Hazard Mitigation Grant.)

R. David Paulison,
Administrator, Federal Emergency Management Agency.
[FR Doc. E8-18437 Filed 8-8-08; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 9110-10-P