[Federal Register Volume 78, Number 119 (Thursday, June 20, 2013)]
[Notices]
[Page 37214]
[FR Doc No: 2013-14734]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission

Notice of Commission Staff Attendance

    The Federal Energy Regulatory Commission (Commission) hereby gives
notice that members of the Commission's staff may attend the following
meeting related to the transmission planning activities of the Southern
Company Services, Inc. and the Midwest Independent Transmission System
Operator, Inc.:

Midwest Independent Transmission System Operator, Inc. and the
Southeastern Regional Transmission Planning (SERTP) Process Order No.
1000 Interregional Coordination Workshop

June 21, 2013, 10:00 a.m.-12:00 p.m., Local Time

    The above-referenced meeting will be via web conference.
    The above-referenced meeting is open to stakeholders.
    Further information may be found at: www.misoenergy.org.
    The discussions at the meeting described above may address matters
at issue in the following proceedings:

Docket No. ER13-908, Alabama Power Company et al.
Docket No. ER13-913, Ohio Valley Electric Corporation.
Docket No. ER13-897, Louisville Gas and Electric Company and Kentucky
Utilities Company.
Docket No. ER13-1221, Mississippi Power Company.
Docket No. EL05-121, PJM Interconnection, L.L.C.
Docket No. EL10-52, Central Transmission, L.L.C. v. PJM
Interconnection, L.L.C.
Docket No. ER09-1256, Potomac-Appalachian Transmission Highline, L.L.C.
Docket Nos. ER10-253 and EL10-14, Primary Power, L.L.C.
Docket Nos. ER11-2814 and ER11-2815, PJM Interconnection, L.L.C. and
American Transmission Systems, Inc.
Docket No. EL12-69, Primary Power LLC v. PJM Interconnection, L.L.C.
Docket No. ER12-91, PJM Interconnection, L.L.C.
Docket No. ER12-92, PJM Interconnection, L.L.C., et al.
Docket No. ER12-1178, PJM Interconnection, L.L.C.
Docket No. ER12-2399, PJM Interconnection, L.L.C.
Docket No. ER12-2708, PJM Interconnection, L.L.C.
Docket No. ER13-90, Public Service Electric and Gas Company and PJM
Interconnection, L.L.C.
Docket No. ER13-195, Indicated PJM Transmission Owners.
Docket No. ER13-198, PJM Interconnection, L.L.C.
Docket No. ER13-1033, Linden VFT, LLC and PJM Interconnection, L.L.C.
Docket Nos. ER13-1177, 1178 and 1179, PJM Interconnection, L.L.C. and
Eastern Kentucky Power Cooperative, Inc.
Docket No. ER11-1844, Midwest Independent Transmission System Operator,
Inc.
Docket No. ER11-4081, Midwest Independent Transmission System Operator,
Inc.
Docket No. ER12-480, Midwest Independent Transmission System Operator,
Inc.
Docket No. ER13-708, Midwest Independent Transmission System Operator,
Inc.
Docket No. ER13-186, Midwest Independent Transmission System Operator,
Inc. and the MISO Transmission Owners.
Docket No. ER13-187, Midwest Independent Transmission System Operator,
Inc. and the MISO Transmission Owners.
Docket No. ER13-89, MidAmerican Energy Company and Midwest Independent
Transmission System Operator, Inc.
Docket No. ER13-101, American Transmission Company LLC and the Midwest
Independent Transmission System Operator, Inc.
Docket No. ER13-84, Cleco Power LLC.
Docket No. ER13-95, Entergy Arkansas, Inc.
Docket No. ER13-80, Tampa Electric Company.
Docket No. ER13-86, Florida Power Corporation.
Docket No. ER13-104, Florida Power & Light Company.
Docket No. NJ13-2, Orlando Utilities Commission.
Docket Nos. ER13-366 and ER13-367, Southwest Power Pool, Inc.
Docket No. ER13-83, Duke Energy Carolinas LLC and Carolina Power &
Light Company.
Docket No. ER13-88, Alcoa Power Generating, Inc.
Docket No. ER13-107, South Carolina Electric & Gas Company.

    For more information, contact Valerie Martin, Office of Energy
Market Regulation, Federal Energy Regulatory Commission at (202) 502-
6139 or<EMAIL_ADDRESS>
    Dated: June 13, 2013.
Kimberly D. Bose,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2013-14734 Filed 6-19-13; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6717-01-P


[Federal Register Volume 76, Number 169 (Wednesday, August 31, 2011)]
[Notices]
[Page 54285]
[FR Doc No: 2011-22250]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION

Federal Aviation Administration

Agency Information Collection Activities: Requests for Comments;
Clearance of Renewed Approval of Information Collection: Rotorcraft
External Load Operator Certificate Application

AGENCY: Federal Aviation Administration (FAA), DOT.

ACTION: Notice and request for comments.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: In accordance with the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995, FAA
invites public comments about our intention to request the Office of
Management and Budget (OMB) approval to renew an information
collection. The Federal Register Notice with a 60-day comment period
soliciting comments on the following collection of information was
published on June 21, 2011, Vol. 76, No. 119, page 36171. Information
required from the public by 14 CFR part 133 is used by the FAA to
process the operating certificate as a record of aircraft authorized
for use, and to monitor Rotorcraft External-Load Operations.

DATES: Written comments should be submitted by September 30, 2011.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Carla Scott on<PHONE_NUMBER>, or by
e-mail at<EMAIL_ADDRESS>
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
    OMB Control Number: 2120-0044.
    Title: Rotorcraft External Load Operator Certificate Application.
    Form Numbers: FAA Form 8710-4.
    Type of Review: Renewal of an information collection.
    Background: The information required by 14 CFR Part 133 is used by
the FAA to process the operating certificate as a record of aircraft
authorized for use, and to monitor Rotorcraft External-Load Operations.
FAA Form 8710-4, Rotorcraft External-Load Operator Certificate
Application, provides a record of surveillance activities when
completed by an inspector. If the information was not collected, FAA
would not be able to meet its regulatory responsibilities under Part
133.
    Respondents: Approximately 4,000 applicants.
    Frequency: Information is collected on occasion.
    Estimated Average Burden per Response: 2.26 hours.
    Estimated Total Annual Burden: 3,268 hours.

ADDRESSES: Interested persons are invited to submit written comments on
the proposed information collection to the Office of Information and
Regulatory Affairs, Office of Management and Budget. Comments should be
addressed to the attention of the Desk Officer, Department of
Transportation/FAA, and sent via electronic mail to<EMAIL_ADDRESS>or faxed to<PHONE_NUMBER>, or mailed to the
Office of Information and Regulatory Affairs, Office of Management and
Budget, Docket Library, Room 10102, 725 17th Street, NW., Washington,
DC 20503.
    Public Comments Invited: You are asked to comment on any aspect of
this information collection, including (a) Whether the proposed
collection of information is necessary for FAA's performance; (b) the
accuracy of the estimated burden; (c) ways for FAA to enhance the
quality, utility, and clarity of the information collection; and (d)
ways that the burden could be minimized without reducing the quality of
the collected information. The agency will summarize and/or include
your comments in the request for OMB's clearance of this information
collection.

    Issued in Washington, DC, on August 22, 2011.
Carla Scott,
FAA Information Collection Clearance Officer, IT Enterprises Business
Services Division, AES-200.
[FR Doc. 2011-22250 Filed 8-30-11; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910-13-P


[Federal Register Volume 87, Number 226 (Friday, November 25, 2022)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Pages 72367-72369]
[FR Doc No: 2022-25592]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION

Federal Aviation Administration

14 CFR Part 25

[Docket No. FAA-2022-1282; Special Conditions No. 25-832-SC]

Special Conditions: Airbus SAS Model A380-800 Series Airplanes;
Electronic System Security Protection From Unauthorized External Access

AGENCY: Federal Aviation Administration (FAA), DOT.

ACTION: Final special conditions; request for comments.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: These special conditions are issued for Airbus SAS (Airbus)
Model A380-800 series airplanes. These airplanes will have a novel or
unusual design feature when compared to the state of technology
envisioned in the airworthiness standards for transport-category
airplanes. This design feature is a digital systems architecture with
several connected networks that will allow access from external sources
(e.g., operator networks, wireless devices, internet connectivity,
service provider satellite communications, electronic flight bags,
etc.) to the airplane's internal electronic components. The applicable
airworthiness regulations do not contain adequate or appropriate safety
standards for this design feature. These special conditions contain the
additional safety standards that the Administrator considers necessary
to establish a level of safety equivalent to that established by the
existing airworthiness standards.

DATES: This action is effective on Airbus on November 25, 2022. Send
comments on or before January 9, 2023.

ADDRESSES: Send comments identified by Docket No. FAA-2022-1282 using
any of the following methods:
     Federal eRegulations Portal: Go to https://www.regulations.gov/ and follow the online instructions for sending
your comments electronically.
     Mail: Send comments to Docket Operations, M-30, U.S.
Department of Transportation (DOT), 1200 New Jersey Avenue SE, Room
W12-140, West Building Ground Floor, Washington, DC 20590-0001.
     Hand Delivery or Courier: Take comments to Docket
Operations in Room W12-140 of the West Building Ground Floor at 1200
New Jersey Avenue SE, Washington, DC, between 9 a.m. and 5 p.m., Monday
through Friday, except Federal holidays.
     Fax: Fax comments to Docket Operations at<PHONE_NUMBER>.
    Privacy: Except for Confidential Business Information (CBI) as
described in the following paragraph, and other information as
described in title 14, Code of Federal Regulations (14 CFR) 11.35, the
FAA will post all comments received without change to https://www.regulations.gov/, including any personal information you provide.
The FAA will also post a report summarizing each substantive verbal
contact received about these special conditions.
    Confidential Business Information: Confidential Business
Information (CBI) is commercial or financial information that is both
customarily and actually treated as private by its owner. Under the
Freedom of Information Act (FOIA) (5 U.S.C. 552), CBI is exempt from
public disclosure. If your comments responsive to these special
conditions contain commercial or financial information that is
customarily treated as private, that you actually treat as private, and
that is relevant or responsive to these special conditions, it is
important that you clearly designate the submitted comments as CBI.
Please

mark each page of your submission containing CBI as ``PROPIN.'' The FAA
will treat such marked submissions as confidential under the FOIA, and
the indicated comments will not be placed in the public docket of these
special conditions. Send submissions containing CBI to Thuan T. Nguyen,
Aircraft Information Systems, AIR-622, Technical Innovation Policy
Branch, Policy and Innovation Division, Aircraft Certification Service,
Federal Aviation Administration, 2200 South 216th Street, Des Moines,
Washington 98198; telephone and fax<PHONE_NUMBER>; email
[email protected]. Comments the FAA receives, which are not
specifically designated as CBI, will be placed in the public docket for
these special conditions.
    Docket: Background documents or comments received may be read at
https://www.regulations.gov/ at any time. Follow the online
instructions for accessing the docket or go to Docket Operations in
Room W12-140 of the West Building Ground Floor at 1200 New Jersey
Avenue SE, Washington, DC, between 9 a.m. and 5 p.m., Monday through
Friday, except Federal holidays.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Thuan T. Nguyen, Aircraft Information
Systems, AIR-622, Technical Innovation Policy Branch, Policy and
Innovation Division, Aircraft Certification Service, Federal Aviation
Administration, 2200 South 216th Street, Des Moines, Washington 98198;
telephone and fax<PHONE_NUMBER>; email [email protected].

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The substance of these special conditions
has been published in the Federal Register for public comment in
several prior instances with no substantive comments received.
Therefore, the FAA finds, pursuant to Sec.  11.38(b), that new comments
are unlikely, and notice and comment prior to this publication are
unnecessary.

Comments Invited

    The FAA invites interested people to take part in this rulemaking
by sending written comments, data, or views. The most helpful comments
reference a specific portion of the special conditions, explain the
reason for any recommended change, and include supporting data.
    The FAA will consider all comments received by the closing date for
comments. The FAA may change these special conditions based on the
comments received.

Background

    On August 26, 2021, Airbus applied for a change to Type Certificate
No. A58NM for the installation of a digital systems architecture that
will allow increased connectivity to and access from external network
sources, (e.g., operator networks, wireless devices, internet
connectivity, service provider satelittle communications, electronic
flight bags, etc.) to the airplane's previously isolated electronic
assets (networks, systems, databases). The Model A380-800 series are
transport category airplanes and are powered by four engines. The
maximum passenger seating capacity is 868 and maximum takeoff weight is
1,234,600 to 1,265,000 pounds, depending on the specific variant.

Type Certification Basis

    Under the provisions of title 14, Code of Federal Regulations (14
CFR) 21.101, Airbus must show that the Model A380-800 series airplane,
as changed, continues to meet the applicable provisions of the
regulations listed in Type Certificate No. A58NM or the applicable
regulations in effect on the date of application for the change, except
for earlier amendments as agreed upon by the FAA.
    If the Administrator finds that the applicable airworthiness
regulations (e.g., 14 CFR part 25) do not contain adequate or
appropriate safety standards for the Airbus Model A380-800 series
airplanes because of a novel or unusual design feature, special
conditions are prescribed under the provisions of Sec.  21.16.
    Special conditions are initially applicable to the model for which
they are issued. Should the type certificate for that model be amended
later to include any other model that incorporates the same novel or
unusual design feature, or should any other model already included on
the same type certificate be modified to incorporate the same novel or
unusual design feature, these special conditions would also apply to
the other model under Sec.  21.101.
    In addition to the applicable airworthiness regulations and special
conditions, the Airbus Model A380-800 series airplanes must comply with
the fuel-vent and exhaust-emission requirements of 14 CFR part 34, and
the noise-certification requirements of 14 CFR part 36.
    The FAA issues special conditions, as defined in 14 CFR 11.19, in
accordance with Sec.  11.38, and they become part of the type
certification basis under Sec.  21.101.

Novel or Unusual Design Features

    The Airbus Model A380-800 series airplanes will incorporate the
following novel or unusual design feature:
    The installation of electronic network system architecture that
allows increased connectivity to and access from external sources
(e.g., operator networks, wireless devices, internet connectivity,
service provider satellite communications, electronic flight bags,
etc.) to the airplane's previously isolated electronic assets
(networks, systems and databases).

Discussion

    The Airbus Model A380-800 series airplane electronic system
architecture and network configuration is novel and unusual for
commercial transport airplanes because it may allow increased
connectivity to and access from external network sources, airline
operations, and maintenance networks, to the airplane control domain
and airline information services domain. The airplane's control domain
and airline information-services domain perform functions required for
the safe operation and maintenance of the airplane. Previously, these
domains had very limited connectivity with external network sources.
This data network and design integration creates a potential for
unauthorized persons to access the aircraft-control domain and airline
information-services domain, and presents security vulnerabilities
related to the introduction of computer viruses and worms, user errors,
and intentional sabotage of airplane electronic assets (networks,
systems, and databases) critical to the safety and maintenance of the
airplane.
    The existing FAA regulations did not anticipate these networked
airplane-system architectures. Furthermore, these regulations and the
current guidance material do not address potential security
vulnerabilities, which could be exploited by unauthorized access to
airplane networks, data buses, and servers. Therefore, these special
conditions ensure that the security (i.e., confidentiality, integrity,
and availability) of airplane systems is not compromised by
unauthorized wired or wireless electronic connections. This includes
ensuring that the security of the airplane's systems is not compromised
during maintenance of the airplane's electronic systems. These special
conditions also require the applicant to provide appropriate
instructions to the operator to maintain all electronic-system
safeguards that have been implemented as part of the original network
design so that this

feature does not allow or introduce security threats.
    These special conditions contain the additional safety standards
that the Administrator considers necessary to establish a level of
safety equivalent to that established by the existing airworthiness
standards.

Applicability

    As discussed above, these special conditions are applicable to
Airbus Model A380-800 series airplanes. Should Airbus apply at a later
date for a change to the type certificate to include another model
incorporating the same novel or unusual design feature, these special
conditions would apply to that model as well.

Conclusion

    This action affects only a certain novel or unusual design feature
on one model series of airplane. It is not a rule of general
applicability.

List of Subjects in 14 CFR Part 25

    Aircraft, Aviation safety, Reporting and recordkeeping
requirements.

Authority Citation

    The authority citation for these special conditions is as follows:

    Authority:  49 U.S.C. 106(f), 106(g), 40113, 44701, 44702,
44704.

The Special Conditions

    Accordingly, pursuant to the authority delegated to me by the
Administrator, the following special conditions are issued as part of
the type certification basis for the Airbus Model A380-800 series
airplanes for airplane electronic unauthorized external access.
    1. The applicant must ensure airplane electronic-system security
protection from access by unauthorized sources external to the
airplane, including those possibly caused by maintenance activity.
    2. The applicant must ensure airplane electronic system security
threats are identified and assessed, and that effective electronic
system security protection strategies are implemented to protect the
airplane from all adverse impacts on safety, functionality, and
continued airworthiness.
    3. The applicant must establish appropriate procedures to allow the
operator to ensure that continued airworthiness of the aircraft is
maintained, including all post-type-certification modifications that
may have an impact on the approved electronic-system security
safeguards.

    Issued in Kansas City, Missouri, on November 18, 2022.
Patrick R. Mullen,
Manager, Technical Innovation Policy Branch, Policy and Innovation
Division, Aircraft Certification Service.
[FR Doc. 2022-25592 Filed 11-23-22; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE P


[Federal Register Volume 86, Number 183 (Friday, September 24, 2021)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Pages 52959-52961]
[FR Doc No: 2021-20480]

=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION

Federal Aviation Administration

14 CFR Part 71

[Docket No. FAA-2021-0536; Airspace Docket No. 21-ASO-20]
RIN 2120-AA66

Establishment of Class D Airspace, and Amendment of Class E
Airspace; Gulf Shores, AL

AGENCY: Federal Aviation Administration (FAA), DOT.

ACTION: Final rule.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: This action establishes Class D airspace, and amends Class E
airspace extending upward from 700 feet above the surface for Jack
Edwards National Airport, Gulf Shores, AL, as a new air traffic control
tower will service the airport. This action also updates the airport's
name and geographic coordinates under the existing Class E

airspace. Controlled airspace is necessary for the safety and
management of instrument flight rules (IFR) operations in the area.

DATES: Effective 0901 UTC, December 2, 2021. The Director of the
Federal Register approves this incorporation by reference action under
1 CFR part 51, subject to the annual revision of FAA Order JO 7400.11
and publication of conforming amendments.

ADDRESSES: FAA Order JO 7400.11F, Airspace Designations and Reporting
Points, and subsequent amendments can be viewed online at https://www.faa.gov/air_traffic/publications/. For further information, you can
contact the Airspace Policy Group, Federal Aviation Administration, 800
Independence Avenue SW, Washington, DC 20591; Telephone: (202) 267-
8783. The Order is also available for inspection at the National
Archives and Records Administration (NARA). For information on the
availability of FAA Order JO 7400.11F at NARA, email
<EMAIL_ADDRESS>or go to https://www.archives.gov/federal-register/cfr/ibr-locations.html.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: John Fornito, Operations Support
Group, Eastern Service Center, Federal Aviation Administration, 1701
Columbia Ave., College Park, GA 30337; Telephone<PHONE_NUMBER>.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

Authority for This Rulemaking

    The FAA's authority to issue rules regarding aviation safety is
found in Title 49 of the United States Code. Subtitle I, Section 106
describes the authority of the FAA Administrator. Subtitle VII,
Aviation Programs, describes in more detail the scope of the agency's
authority. This rulemaking is promulgated under the authority described
in Subtitle VII, Part A, Subpart I, Section 40103. Under that section,
the FAA is charged with prescribing regulations to assign the use of
airspace necessary to ensure the safety of aircraft and the efficient
use of airspace. This regulation is within the scope of that authority
as it establishes Class D airspace and amends Class E airspace for Jack
Edwards National Airport, Gulf Shores, AL.

History

    The FAA published a notice of proposed rulemaking in the Federal
Register (86 FR 37939, July 19, 2021) for Docket No. FAA-2021-0536 to
establish Class D airspace and amend Class E airspace extending upward
from 700 feet above the surface for Jack Edwards National Airport, Gulf
Shores, AL, as a new air traffic control tower will service the
airport. This action also proposed updating the airport's name and
geographic coordinates under the existing Class E airspace.
    Interested parties were invited to participate in this rulemaking
effort by submitting written comments on the proposal to the FAA. No
comments were received.
    Class D and Class E airspace designations are published in
Paragraphs 5000, and 6005, respectively, of FAA Order JO 7400.11F,
dated August 10, 2021, and effective September 15, 2021, which is
incorporated by reference in 14 CFR 71.1. The Class D and E airspace
designations listed in this document will be published subsequently in
the Order.

Availability and Summary of Documents for Incorporation by Reference

    This document amends FAA Order JO 7400.11F, Airspace Designations
and Reporting Points, dated August 10, 2021, and effective September
15, 2021. FAA Order JO 7400.11F is publicly available as listed in the
ADDRESSES section of this document. FAA Order JO 7400.11F lists Class
A, B, C, D, and E airspace areas, air traffic routes, and reporting
points.

The Rule

    The FAA is amending 14 CFR part 71 by establishing Class D airspace
for Jack Edwards National Airport, Gulf Shores, AL, as a new air
traffic control tower will service the airport. Also, an airspace
evaluation resulted in increasing the radius of the existing Class E
airspace extending upward from 700 feet above the surface to 6.8 miles
from 6.5 miles. In addition, the FAA is updating the name and
geographic coordinates of the airport to coincide with the FAA's
aeronautical database. Finally, the city name is removed from the
airspace header under the existing Class E airspace to comply with the
7400.2M. These changes are necessary for continued safety and
management of IFR operations in the area.
    FAA Order JO 7400.11, Airspace Designations and Reporting Points,
is published yearly and effective on September 15.

Regulatory Notices and Analyses

    The FAA has determined that this regulation only involves an
established body of technical regulations for which frequent and
routine amendments are necessary to keep them operationally current. It
therefore: (1) Is not a ``significant regulatory action'' under
Executive Order 12866; (2) is not a ``significant rule'' under DOT
Regulatory Policies and Procedures (44 FR 11034; February 26, 1979);
and (3) does not warrant preparation of a regulatory evaluation as the
anticipated impact is minimal. Since this is a routine matter that only
affects air traffic procedures an air navigation, it is certified that
this rule, when promulgated, does not have a significant economic
impact on a substantial number of small entities under the criteria of
the Regulatory Flexibility Act.

Environmental Review

    The FAA has determined that this action qualifies for categorical
exclusion under the National Environmental Policy Act in accordance
with FAA Order 1050.1F, ``Environmental Impacts: Policies and
Procedures,'' paragraph 5-6.5a. This airspace action is not expected to
cause any potentially significant environmental impacts, and no
extraordinary circumstances exist that warrant preparation of an
environmental assessment.

Lists of Subjects in 14 CFR Part 71

    Airspace, Incorporation by reference, Navigation (air).

Adoption of the Amendment

    In consideration of the foregoing, the Federal Aviation
Administration amends 14 CFR part 71 as follows:

PART 71--DESIGNATION OF CLASS A, B, C, D, AND E AIRSPACE AREAS; AIR
TRAFFIC SERVICE ROUTES; AND REPORTING POINTS

0
1. The authority citation for part 71 continues to read as follows:

    Authority:  49 U.S.C. 106(f), 106(g); 40103, 40113, 40120; E.O.
10854, 24 FR 9565, 3 CFR, 1959-1963 Comp., p. 389.

Sec.  71.1   [Amended]

0
2. The incorporation by reference in 14 CFR 71.1 of FAA Order JO
7400.11F, Airspace Designations and Reporting Points, dated August10,
2021, and effective September 15, 2021, is amended as follows:

Paragraph 5000 Class D Airspace.

* * * * *

ASO AL D Gulf Shores, AL [New]

Jack Edwards National Airport, AL
    (Lat. 30[deg]17'23' W'' N, long. 87[deg]40'18'' W)

    That airspace extending upward from the surface to and including
2,000 feet MSL, within a 4.3-mile radius of Jack Edwards National
Airport, excluding that airspace within Restricted Area R-2908. This
Class D airspace area is effective during the specific dates and
times established in advance by a Notice to Airmen. The effective
date and time

will thereafter be continuously published in the Chart Supplement.

Paragraph 6005 Class E Airspace Areas Extending Upward From 700
Feet or More Above the Surface of the Earth.

* * * * *

ASO AL E5 Gulf Shores, AL [Amended]

Jack Edwards National Airport, AL
    (Lat. 30[deg]17'23' W'' N, long. 87[deg]40'18'' W)

    That airspace extending upward from 700 feet above the surface
within a 6.8-mile radius of Jack Edwards National Airport, excluding
that airspace within Restricted Area R-2908.

    Issued in College Park, Georgia, on September 17, 2021.
Matthew N. Cathcart,
(A) Manager, Operations Support Group, Eastern Service Center, Air
Traffic Organization.
[FR Doc. 2021-20480 Filed 9-23-21; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910-13-P


species. orig stage year impinged. est entrained. est junk junk  999  999  999 little. skate age01 1995 0 na american. eel age01 1995 12.79166667 na rainbow. smelt age01 1995 61.605 na atlantic. cod age01 1995 0 na atlantic. tomcod age01 1995 18.6 na red. hake age01 1995 13.95 na mummichog age01 1995 0 na atlantic. silverside age01 1995 0 na threespine. stickleback age01 1995 0 na northern. pipefish age01 1995 42.9 na grubby age01 1995 48.68566667 na shorthorn. sculpin age01 1995 0 na lumpfish age01 1995 0 na tautog age01 1995 0 na cunner age01 1995 0 na sand. lance age01 1995 0 na butterfish age01 1995 0 na windowpane age01 1995 0 na winter. flounder age01 1995 25.4668 na yellowtail. flounder age01 1995 0 na little. skate age01 1996 80.6 na american. eel age01 1996 85.26 na blueback. herring age01 1996 238.7 na alewife age01 1996 80.6 na atlantic. herring age01 1996 80.6 na chain. pickerel age01 1996 15.5 na rainbow. smelt age01 1996 7300.5 na atlantic. cod age01 1996 0 na red. hake age01 1996 0 na mummichog age01 1996 0 na atlantic. silverside age01 1996 396.8 na fourspine. stickleback age01 1996 0 na threespine. stickleback age01 1996 0 na blackspotted. stickleback age01 1996 17.05 na northern. pipefish age01 1996 96.425 na northern. searobin age01 1996 158.1 na grubby age01 1996 0 na lumpfish age01 1996 0 na scup age01 1996 80.6 na tautog age01 1996 27 na cunner age01 1996 131.31 na sand. lance age01 1996 0 na butterfish age01 1996 0 na windowpane age01 1996 0 na winter. flounder age01 1996 2643.848 na tautog. cunner egg 1995 na 9506768.475 tautog. cunner egg 1996 na 14377716.03 windowpane egg 1995 na 2730317.59 windowpane egg 1996 na 3070083.128 atlantic. mackerel egg 1995 na 4934308.897 atlantic. mackerel egg 1996 na 10942870.55 atlantic. herring larvae 1995 na 32895.39265 atlantic. herring larvae 1996 na 273571.7639 cunner larvae 1995 na 559221.675 cunner larvae 1996 na 303968.6265 sand. lance larvae 1995 na 526326.2824 sand. lance larvae 1996 na 2279764.699 atlantic. mackerel larvae 1995 na 3815865.547 atlantic. mackerel larvae 1996 na 334365.4892 grubby larvae 1995 na 1085547.957 grubby larvae 1996 na 6261753.706 fourbeard. rockling larvae 1995 na 263163.1412 fourbeard. rockling larvae 1996 na 182381.1759 winter. flounder larvae 1995 na 460535.4971 winter. flounder larvae 1996 na 303968.6265 rock. gunnel larvae 1995 na 230267.7485 rock. gunnel larvae 1996 na 729524.7036 notes comments QC junk junk junk [ 40250] Table 2 J. Hazen [ 40250] Table 2 J. Hazen [ 40250] Table 2 J. Hazen [ 40250] Table 2 J. Hazen [ 40250] Table 2 J. Hazen [ 40250] Table 2 J. Hazen [ 40250] Table 2 J. Hazen [ 40250] Table 2 J. Hazen [ 40250] Table 2 J. Hazen [ 40250] Table 2 J. Hazen [ 40250] Table 2 J. Hazen [ 40250] Table 2 J. Hazen [ 40250] Table 2 J. Hazen [ 40250] Table 2 J. Hazen [ 40250] Table 2 J. Hazen [ 40250] Table 2 J. Hazen [ 40250] Table 2 J. Hazen [ 40250] Table 2 J. Hazen [ 40250] Table 2 J. Hazen [ 40250] Table 3 J. Hazen [ 40250] Table 3 J. Hazen [ 40250] Table 3 J. Hazen [ 40250] Table 3 J. Hazen [ 40250] Table 3 J. Hazen [ 40250] Table 3 J. Hazen [ 40250] Table 3 J. Hazen [ 40250] Table 3 J. Hazen [ 40250] Table 3 J. Hazen [ 40250] Table 3 J. Hazen [ 40250] Table 3 J. Hazen [ 40250] Table 3 J. Hazen [ 40250] Table 3 J. Hazen [ 40250] Table 3 J. Hazen [ 40250] Table 3 J. Hazen [ 40250] Table 3 J. Hazen [ 40250] Table 3 J. Hazen [ 40250] Table 3 J. Hazen [ 40250] Table 3 J. Hazen [ 40250] Table 3 J. Hazen [ 40250] Table 3 J. Hazen [ 40250] Table 3 J. Hazen [ 40250] Table 3 J. Hazen [ 40250] Table 3 J. Hazen [ 40250] Table 3 J. Hazen [ 40250] Table 3 J. Hazen [ 40250] Table 13 J. Hazen [ 40250] Table 13 J. Hazen [ 40250] Table 13 J. Hazen [ 40250] Table 13 J. Hazen [ 40250] Table 13 J. Hazen [ 40250] Table 13 J. Hazen [ 40250] Table 13 J. Hazen [ 40250] Table 13 J. Hazen [ 40250] Table 13 J. Hazen [ 40250] Table 13 J. Hazen [ 40250] Table 13 J. Hazen [ 40250] Table 13 J. Hazen [ 40250] Table 13 J. Hazen [ 40250] Table 13 J. Hazen [ 40250] Table 13 J. Hazen [ 40250] Table 13 J. Hazen [ 40250] Table 13 J. Hazen [ 40250] Table 13 J. Hazen [ 40250] Table 13 J. Hazen [ 40250] Table 13 J. Hazen [ 40250] Table 13 J. Hazen [ 40250] Table 13 J. Hazen Impingement and entrainment losses data for the General Electric River Works Facility, Lynn, Mass. For the project Intake Anton Miescher July 21 2005 Facility. fullname = Ge Company Aircraft Engines Phase 3, Ref Mgr 40250 IMPINGEMENT AND ENTRAINMENT for 1995 and 1996. assigned number 40250 Intake name. as. entered species. orig species. lh stage. as. enterestage year Little skate little. skate skate. species age01 age01 1995 American eel american. eel non. ris. rec. com age01 age01 1995 Rainbow smelt rainbow. smelt rainbow. smelt. north age01 age01 1995 Atlantic cod atlantic. cod atlantic. cod age01 age01 1995 Atlantic tomcod atlantic. tomcod atlantic. tomcod age01 age01 1995 Red hake red. hake red. hake age01 age01 1995 Mummichog mummichog striped. killifish age01 age01 1995 Atlantic silverside atlantic. silverside atlantic. silverside age01 age01 1995 Threespine stickleback threespine. stickleback threespine. stickleback age01 age01 1995 Northern Pipefish northern. pipefish northern. pipefish age01 age01 1995 Grubby grubby grubby age01 age01 1995 Shorthorn sculpin shorthorn. sculpin sculpin. spp age01 age01 1995 Lumpfish lumpfish lumpfish age01 age01 1995 Tautog tautog tautog age01 age01 1995 Cunner cunner cunner age01 age01 1995 Sand lance sand. lanceamerican. sand. lance age01 age01 1995 Butterfish butterfish butterfish age01 age01 1995 Windowpane windowpane windowpane. north age01 age01 1995 Winter flounder winter. flounder winter. flounder3 age01 age01 1995 Yellow tail yellowtail. flounder winter. flounder3 age01 age01 1995 Little skate little. skate skate. species age01 age01 1996 American eel american. eel non. ris. rec. com age01 age01 1996 Blueback herring blueback. herringlueback. herring. north age01 age01 1996 Alewife alewife alewife. north age01 age01 1996 Atlantic herring atlantic. herring atlantic. herring age01 age01 1996 Chain pickerel chain. pickerel non. ris. forage age01 age01 1996 Rainbow smelt rainbow. smelt rainbow. smelt. north age01 age01 1996 Atlantic cod atlantic. cod atlantic. cod age01 age01 1996 Red hake red. hake red. hake age01 age01 1996 Mummichog mummichog striped. killifish age01 age01 1996 Atlantic silverside atlantic. silverside atlantic. silverside age01 age01 1996 Fourspine stickleback fourspine. stickleback threespine. stickleback age01 age01 1996 Threespine stickleback threespine. stickleback threespine. stickleback age01 age01 1996 Blackspotted stickleback blackspotted. stickleback threespine. stickleback age01 age01 1996 Northern pipefish northern. pipefish northern. pipefish age01 age01 1996 Northern searobin northern. searobin searobin age01 age01 1996 Grubby grubby grubby age01 age01 1996 Lumpfish lumpfish lumpfish age01 age01 1996 Scup scup scup age01 age01 1996 Tautog tautog tautog age01 age01 1996 Cunner cunner cunner age01 age01 1996 Sand lance sand. lanceamerican. sand. lance age01 age01 1996 Butterfish butterfish butterfish age01 age01 1996 Windowpane windowpane windowpane. north age01 age01 1996 Winter flounder winter. flounder winter. flounder3 age01 age01 1996 Tautog/ Cunner tautog. cunner cunner eggs egg 1995 Tautog/ Cunner tautog. cunner cunner eggs egg 1996 Windowpane windowpane windowpane. north eggs egg 1995 Windowpane windowpane windowpane. north eggs egg 1996 Atlantic mackerel atlantic. mackerel atlantic. mackerel eggs egg 1995 Atlantic mackerel atlantic. mackerel atlantic. mackerel eggs egg 1996 Atlantic herring atlantic. herring atlantic. herring larvae larvae 1995 Atlantic herring atlantic. herring atlantic. herring larvae larvae 1996 Cunner cunner cunner larvae larvae 1995 Cunner cunner cunner larvae larvae 1996 Sand lance sand. lanceamerican. sand. lance larvae larvae 1995 Sand lance sand. lanceamerican. sand. lance larvae larvae 1996 Atlantic mackerel atlantic. mackerel atlantic. mackerel larvae larvae 1995 Atlantic mackerel atlantic. mackerel atlantic. mackerel larvae larvae 1996 Grubby grubby grubby larvae larvae 1995 Grubby grubby grubby larvae larvae 1996 Fourbeard rockling fourbeard. rockling fourbeard. rockling larvae larvae 1995 Fourbeard rockling fourbeard. rockling fourbeard. rockling larvae larvae 1996 Winter flounder winter. flounder winter. flounder3 larvae larvae 1995 Winter flounder winter. flounder winter. flounder3 larvae larvae 1996 Rock gunnel rock. gunnel rock. gunnel larvae larvae 1995 Rock gunnel rock. gunnel rock. gunnel larvae larvae 1996 impinged. est entrained. est notes comments 0 na [ 40250] Table 2 12.79166667 na [ 40250] Table 2 61.605 na [ 40250] Table 2 0 na [ 40250] Table 2 18.6 na [ 40250] Table 2 13.95 na [ 40250] Table 2 0 na [ 40250] Table 2 0 na [ 40250] Table 2 0 na [ 40250] Table 2 42.9 na [ 40250] Table 2 48.68566667 na [ 40250] Table 2 0 na [ 40250] Table 2 0 na [ 40250] Table 2 0 na [ 40250] Table 2 0 na [ 40250] Table 2 0 na [ 40250] Table 2 0 na [ 40250] Table 2 0 na [ 40250] Table 2 25.4668 na [ 40250] Table 2 0 na [ 40250] Table 3 80.6 na [ 40250] Table 3 85.26 na [ 40250] Table 3 238.7 na [ 40250] Table 3 80.6 na [ 40250] Table 3 80.6 na [ 40250] Table 3 15.5 na [ 40250] Table 3 7300.5 na [ 40250] Table 3 0 na [ 40250] Table 3 0 na [ 40250] Table 3 0 na [ 40250] Table 3 396.8 na [ 40250] Table 3 0 na [ 40250] Table 3 0 na [ 40250] Table 3 17.05 na [ 40250] Table 3 96.425 na [ 40250] Table 3 158.1 na [ 40250] Table 3 0 na [ 40250] Table 3 0 na [ 40250] Table 3 80.6 na [ 40250] Table 3 27 na [ 40250] Table 3 131.31 na [ 40250] Table 3 0 na [ 40250] Table 3 0 na [ 40250] Table 3 0 na [ 40250] Table 3 2643.848 na [ 40250] Table 3 na 9,506,768 [ 40250] Table 13 na 14,377,716 [ 40250] Table 13 na 2,730,318 [ 40250] Table 13 na 3,070,083 [ 40250] Table 13 na 4,934,309 [ 40250] Table 13 na 10,942,871 [ 40250] Table 13 na 32895.39265 [ 40250] Table 13 na 273571.7639 [ 40250] Table 13 na 559221.675 [ 40250] Table 13 na 303968.6265 [ 40250] Table 13 na 526326.2824 [ 40250] Table 13 na 2279764.699 [ 40250] Table 13 na 3815865.547 [ 40250] Table 13 na 334365.4892 [ 40250] Table 13 na 1085547.957 [ 40250] Table 13 na 6261753.706 [ 40250] Table 13 na 263163.1412 [ 40250] Table 13 na 182381.1759 [ 40250] Table 13 na 460535.4971 [ 40250] Table 13 na 303968.6265 [ 40250] Table 13 na 230267.7485 [ 40250] Table 13 na 729524.7036 [ 40250] Table 13 QC FISHES 1995 IMPINGMENT name stage year impinged entrained Little skate age01 1995 0.0 NA American eel age01 1995 12.8 NA Rainbow smelt age01 1995 61.6 NA Atlantic cod age01 1995 0.0 NA Atlantic tomcod age01 1995 18.6 NA Red hake age01 1995 14.0 NA Munnichog age01 1995 0.0 NA Atlantic silversides age01 1995 0.0 NA Threespine stickleback age01 1995 0.0 NA Northern Pipefish age01 1995 42.9 NA Grubby age01 1995 48.7 NA Shorthorn sculpin age01 1995 0.0 NA Lumpfish age01 1995 0.0 NA Tautog age01 1995 0.0 NA Cunner age01 1995 0.0 NA Sand lance age01 1995 0.0 NA Butterfish age01 1995 0.0 NA Windowpane age01 1995 0.0 NA Winter flounder age01 1995 25.5 NA Yellow tail age01 1995 0.0 NA 1996 IMPINGMENT name stage year impinged entrained Little skate age01 1996 80.6 NA American eel age01 1996 85.3 NA Blueback herring age01 1996 238.7 NA Alewife age01 1996 80.6 NA Atlantic herring age01 1996 80.6 NA Chain pickerel age01 1996 15.5 NA Rainbow smelt age01 1996 7300.5 NA Atlantic cod age01 1996 0.0 NA Red hake age01 1996 0.0 NA Munnichog age01 1996 0.0 NA Atlantic silversides age01 1996 396.8 NA Fourspine stickleback age01 1996 0.0 NA Threespine stickleback age01 1996 0.0 NA Blackspotted stickelbackage01 1996 17.1 NA Northern pipfish age01 1996 96.4 NA Northern searobin age01 1996 158.1 NA Grubby age01 1996 0.0 NA Lumpfish age01 1996 0.0 NA Scup age01 1996 80.6 NA Tautog age01 1996 27.0 NA Cunner age01 1996 131.3 NA Sand lance age01 1996 0.0 NA Butterfish age01 1996 0.0 NA Windowpane age01 1996 0.0 NA Winter flounder age01 1996 2643.8 NA INVERTABRATES 1995 IMPINGMENT name stage year impinged entrained common periwinkle age01 1995 88.35 Blue mussel age01 1995 46.5 Horseshoe crab age01 1995 110.8333 7 spine bay shrimp age01 1995 15268.72 American lobster age01 1995 993.7833 Flatclaw hermit crab age01 1995 134.85 Rock crab/ Jonah crab age01 1995 6481.833 Green crab age01 1995 6866.05 Lady crab age01 1995 157.5333 Star fish age01 1995 72.85 1996 IMPINGMENT name stage year impinged entrained Horseshoe crab age01 1996 13.5 7 spine bay shrimp age01 1996 523968.3 American lobster age01 1996 1337.4 Rock crab/ Jonah crab age01 1996 8102.95 Green crab age01 1996 33757.65 Lady crab age01 1996 140.8 RAW DATA Table 2 page 36 03 Nov 94 10 Dec 94 12 Jan 95 14 Feb 95 07 Mar 95 21 Mar 95 06 Apr 95 Little skate 0.6 American eel Rainbow smelt 2.8 1 2.4 Atlantic cod 0.8 Atlantic tomcod 0.6 Red hake Munnichog 1 Atlantic silverside 1.1 Threespine stickleback 4 1 1.9 Northern Pipefish Grubby 7.8 126.1 167.5 44.7 7.9 3 6.7 Shorthorn sculpin 12.2 1.1 6.9 1.6 Lumpfish 0.6 Tautog 0.9 Cunner 2.8 1 Sand lance Butterfish Windowpane Winter flounder 0.9 5.5 23.5 1.9 Yellow tail 3.3 total 21.8 144.5 199.9 49.5 12.9 4 10.5 CALCULATED Average of the months 30 31 31 28 31 30 31 Nov 94 Dec 94 Jan 95 Feb 95 Mar 95 Apr 95 May 95 [ no./ day] Little skate 0 0.6 0 0 0 0 0 American eel 0 0 0 0 0 00.666667 Rainbow smelt 0 2.8 1 2.4 0 0 0 Atlantic cod 0 0 0 0.8 0 0 0 Atlantic tomcod 0 0.6 0 0 0 0 0 Red hake 0 0 0 0 0 0 Munnichog 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 Atlantic silversides 0 1.1 0 0 0 0 0 Threespine stickleback 0 0 0 0 2.5 0.95 0 Northern Pipefish 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Grubby 7.8 126.1 167.5 44.7 5.45 7.2 4.566667 Shorthorn sculpin 12.2 1.1 6.9 1.6 0 0 0 Lumpfish 0 0.6 0 0 0 0 0 Tautog 0.9 0 0 0 0 0 0 Cunner 0 2.8 0 0 0.5 2.9 1 Sand lance 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Butterfish 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Windowpane 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Winter flounder 0.9 5.5 23.5 0 0 2.4 2.933333 Yellow tail 0 3.3 0 0 0 0 0 Flow [ mg/ day] 15 28.2 28.7 31.2 26.3 21.9 21 [ no/ month] Little skate 0 18.6 0 0 0 0 0 American eel 0 0 0 0 0 020.66667 Rainbow smelt 0 86.8 31 67.2 0 0 0 Atlantic cod 0 0 0 22.4 0 0 0 Atlantic tomcod 0 18.6 0 0 0 0 0 Red hake 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Munnichog 0 0 31 0 0 0 0 Atlantic silversides 0 34.1 0 0 0 0 0 Threespine stickleback 0 0 0 0 77.5 28.5 0 Northern Pipefish 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Grubby 234 3909.1 5192.5 1251.6 168.95 216 141.5667 Shorthorn sculpin 366 34.1 213.9 44.8 0 0 0 Lumpfish 0 18.6 0 0 0 0 0 Tautog 27 0 0 0 0 0 0 Cunner 0 86.8 0 0 15.5 87 31 Sand lance 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Butterfish 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Windowpane 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Winter flounder 27 170.5 728.5 0 0 72 90.93333 Yellow tail 0 102.3 0 0 0 0 0 RAW DATA Table 3 page 38 20 Nov 95 18 Dec 95 26 Jan 96 16 Feb 96 03 Mar 96 17 Mar 96 11 Apr 96 Little skate American eel 0.9 0.9 Blueback herring Alewife Atlantic herring Chain pickerel 1 Rainbow smelt Atlantic cod 0.9 Red hake 2.7 Mummichog 0.9 1.7 1.1 Atlantic silverside Fourspine stickleback 1.6 Threespine stickleback 42.8 18.8 195.8 17.8 0.9 Blackspotted stickleback 1.1 Northern pipfish 0.9 1 0.9 Northern searobin Grubby 249.3 321.6 42.8 17.8 17.8 7.8 24.7 Lumpfish 0.9 Scup Tautog 0.9 Cunner 54.6 3.1 6.1 1 1.1 1.8 Sand lance 0.9 0.9 Butterfish 0.9 Windowpane 22.7 1.6 Winter flounder 224.8 20.3 23.6 4.9 2.2 10.6 TOTAL 561.3 348.2 118.8 36.6 221.5 31.1 38.9 CALCULATED Average of the months 30 31 31 28 31 30 31 Nov 94 Dec 94 Jan 95 Feb 95 Mar 95 Apr 95 May 95 [ no./ day] Little skate 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 American eel 0.9 0 0.9 0 0 0 0.7 Blueback herring 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Alewife 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Atlantic herring 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Chain pickerel 0 0 0 0 0.5 0 0 Rainbow smelt 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Atlantic cod 0.9 0 0 0 0 0 0 Red hake 2.7 0 0 0 0 0 0 Mummichog 0.9 0 1.7 0 0.55 0 0 Atlantic silverside 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Fourspine stickleback 0 1.6 0 0 0 0 0 Threespine stickleback 0 0 42.8 18.8 106.8 0.45 0 Blackspotted stickelback 0 0 0 0 0.55 0 0 Northern pipfish 0.9 0 0 0 0.5 0.45 0 Northern searobin 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Grubby 249.3 321.6 42.8 17.8 12.8 26.3 8.1 Lumpfish 0.9 0 0 0 0 0 0 Scup 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Tautog 0.9 0 0 0 0 0 0 Cunner 54.6 3.1 6.1 0 1.05 2.55 9.05 Sand lance 0.9 0 0.9 0 0 0 0 Butterfish 0.9 0 0 0 0 0 0 Windowpane 22.7 1.6 0 0 0 1.1 0 Winter flounder 224.8 20.3 23.6 0 3.55 17.6 1.75 [ no/ month] Nov 94 Dec 94 Jan 95 Feb 95 Mar 95 Apr 95 May 95 Little skate 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 American eel 27 0 27.9 0 0 0 21.7 Blueback herring 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Alewife 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Atlantic herring 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Chain pickerel 0 0 0 0 15.5 0 0 Rainbow smelt 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Atlantic cod 27 0 0 0 0 0 0 Red hake 81 0 0 0 0 0 0 Mummichog 27 0 52.7 0 17.05 0 0 Atlantic silverside 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Fourspine stickleback 0 49.6 0 0 0 0 0 Threespine stickleback 0 0 1326.8 526.4 3310.8 13.5 0 Blackspotted stickelback 0 0 0 0 17.05 0 0 Northern pipefish 27 0 0 0 15.5 13.5 0 Northern searobin 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Grubby 7479 9969.6 1326.8 498.4 396.8 789 251.1 Lumpfish 27 0 0 0 0 0 0 Scup 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Tautog 27 0 0 0 0 0 0 Cunner 1638 96.1 189.1 0 32.55 76.5 280.55 Sand lance 27 0 27.9 0 0 0 0 Butterfish 27 0 0 0 0 0 0 Windowpane 681 49.6 0 0 0 33 0 Winter flounder 6744 629.3 731.6 0 110.05 528 54.25 RAW DATA Table 8 page 46 03 Nov 94 10 Dec 94 12 Jan 95 14 Feb 95 07 Mar 95 21 Mar 95 06 Apr 95 common periwinkle Blue mussel Horseshoe crab 0.9 7 spine bay shrimp 5.5 381.2 6.5 17.8 9 153.6 American lobster 1.7 1.1 Flatclaw hermit crab Rock crab/ Jonah crab 6.1 13.8 7.9 7.3 12.9 29 6.7 Green crab 12.2 13.8 2 4.9 5.9 8 Lady crab 1.7 Star fish CALCULATED Average of the months 30 31 31 28 31 30 31 [ no./ day] Nov 94 Dec 94 Jan 95 Feb 95 Mar 95 Apr 95 May 95 common periwinkle 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Blue mussel 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Horseshoe crab 0.9 0 0 0 0 00.333333 7 spine bay shrimp 0 5.5 381.2 6.5 13.4 82.1 6.166667 American lobster 1.7 1.1 0 0 0 1.9 3.933333 Flatclaw hermit crab 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Rock crab/ Jonah crab 6.1 13.8 7.9 7.3 20.95 20.15 59.03333 Green crab 12.2 13.8 2 4.9 6.95 4.8 9.5 Lady crab 1.7 0 0 0 0 0.95 0.633333 Star fish 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 30 31 31 28 31 30 31 [ no/ month] Nov 94 Dec 94 Jan 95 Feb 95 Mar 95 Apr 95 May 95 common periwinkle 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Blue mussel 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Horseshoe crab 27 0 0 0 0 010.33333 7 spine bay shrimp 0 170.5 11817.2 182 415.4 2463 191.1667 American lobster 51 34.1 0 0 0 57 121.9333 Flatclaw hermit crab 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Rock crab/ Jonah crab 183 427.8 244.9 204.4 649.45 604.5 1830.033 Green crab 366 427.8 62 137.2 215.45 144 294.5 Lady crab 51 0 0 0 0 28.5 19.63333 Star fish 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 RAW DATA Table 9 page 47 20 Nov 95 18 Dec 95 26 Jan 96 16 Feb 96 03 Mar 96 17 Mar 96 11 Apr 96 Horseshoe crab 7 spine bay shrimp 87 176 American lobster 0.9 Rock crab/ Jonah crab 52.8 3.1 3.5 0.9 6.9 14.4 8.8 Green crab 585.1 1.6 13.1 14.4 17.6 Lady crab CALCULATED Average of the monthes 30 31 31 28 31 30 31 [ no./ day] Nov 94 Dec 94 Jan 95 Feb 95 Mar 95 Apr 95 May 95 Horseshoe crab 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 7 spine bay shrimp 0 0 87 0 0 258.8 14.35 American lobster 0 0 0 0 0 5.5 2.15 Rock crab/ Jonah crab 52.8 3.1 3.5 0.9 10.65 18.95 60.9 Green crab 585.1 1.6 13.1 0 7.2 20 57.45 Lady crab 0 0 0 0 0 3.35 0.85 30 31 31 28 31 30 31 [ no/ month] Nov 94 Dec 94 Jan 95 Feb 95 Mar 95 Apr 95 May 95 Horseshoe crab 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 7 spine bay shrimp 0 0 2697 0 0 7764 444.85 American lobster 0 0 0 0 0 165 66.65 Rock crab/ Jonah crab 1584 96.1 108.5 25.2 330.15 568.5 1887.9 Green crab 17553 49.6 406.1 0 223.2 600 1780.95 Lady crab 0 0 0 0 0 100.5 26.35 25 Apr 95 03 May 95 16 May 95 30 May 95 06 Jun 95 28 Jun 95 11 Jul 95 25 Jul 95 16 Aug 95 1 1 1 1 1 1 7.7 3.8 2.9 7 1 1.9 1.9 5.8 1 2 2 1.9 2.9 2.9 1.9 4 2 2 3.9 8.5 9.9 16.4 6.7 6.8 14 6 3 7.7 10.4 11.9 30 31 31 30 31 365 Jun 95 Jul 95 Aug 95 Sep 95 Oct 95 0 0 0 0 0 0.5 0 0.5 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.45 0 0 0.5 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.5 0 0 0 0.9 0.5 1.9 1.4 11.3 19.4 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.45 1 0.95 0.45 9.4 9.35 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 6.2 7.25 9.4 8.85 0 0 0 0 0 23.9 23.1 23 21.4 22 sum [ no./ year] Survival rates [%] 0 0 0 0 0 18.6 100 15 0 15.5 0 0 51.16667 75 0 0 0 0 0 185 66.7 0 0 0 0 0 22.4 100 0 0 0 0 0 18.6 0 0 0 0 0 13.95 13.95 0 0 0 15.5 0 0 46.5 100 0 0 0 0 0 34.1 100 0 0 0 0 0 106 100 15 0 0 0 27.9 42.9 0 15 58.9 43.4 339 601.4 12171.42 99.6 0 0 0 0 0 658.8 100 0 0 0 0 0 18.6 100 0 0 0 0 13.95 40.95 100 30 29.45 13.95 282 289.85 865.55 100 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 60 192.2 224.75 282 274.35 2122.233 98.8 0 0 0 0 0 102.3 100 25 Apr 96 08 May 96 22 May 96 06 Jun 96 22 Jun 96 08 Jul 96 19 Jul 96 06 Aug 96 29 Aug 96 1.4 2.8 0.9 0.9 0.9 27.9 8.4 7.8 3.9 0.9 3.3 6.3 11.8 1.8 1 1.8 1.9 2.2 24.6 3.5 2.8 2.9 6.2 3.7 3.4 58 19.6 19.6 3.7 4.6 7.8 8 6.5 5.2 30 31 31 30 31 365 Jun 95 Jul 95 Aug 95 Sep 95 Oct 95 0 0 0 0 2.6 1.4 0 0.45 0 2.6 0 0 0 0 7.7 0 0 0 0 2.6 0 0 0 0 2.6 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 235.5 0 0 0 0 5.1 0 0 0 0 2.6 0 0 0.45 0 2.6 0 0 0 0 12.8 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.45 0 0 0 10.2 0 0 0 0 5.1 0 1.95 0.45 5.45 1095.7 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2.6 0 0 0 0 0 0.9 1.4 0.95 2.55 25.6 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 378.9 1.4 4.55 3.55 12.95 760.3 sum Jun 95 Jul 95 Aug 95 Sep 95 Oct 95 [ no./ year] Survival rates [%] 0 0 0 0 80.6 80.6 0 42 0 13.95 0 80.6 213.15 60 0 0 0 0 238.7 238.7 0 0 0 0 0 80.6 80.6 0 0 0 0 0 80.6 80.6 0 0 0 0 0 0 15.5 0 0 0 0 0 7300.5 7300.5 0 0 0 0 0 158.1 185.1 100 0 0 0 0 80.6 161.6 100 0 0 13.95 0 80.6 191.3 100 0 0 0 0 396.8 396.8 0 0 0 0 0 0 49.6 100 0 0 0 0 0 5177.5 100 0 0 0 0 0 17.05 0 13.5 0 0 0 316.2 385.7 75 0 0 0 0 158.1 158.1 0 0 60.45 13.95 163.5 33966.7 54915.3 100 0 0 0 0 0 27 100 0 0 0 0 80.6 80.6 0 0 0 0 0 0 27 0 27 43.4 29.45 76.5 793.6 3282.75 96 0 0 0 0 0 54.9 100 0 0 0 0 0 27 100 0 0 0 0 11745.9 12509.5 100 42 141.05 110.05 388.5 23569.3 33048.1 92 25 Apr 95 03 May 95 16 May 95 30 May 95 06 Jun 95 28 Jun 95 11 Jul 95 25 Jul 95 16 Aug 95 3.7 2 3 1 4.9 10.6 8.6 2.9 7 0.9 1 3.8 1 3.8 7 4.9 1.9 7.9 5.8 0.9 2 33.6 20.2 73.9 83 7 16.7 9.7 5.6 17.8 9.6 2.9 10.6 15 16 10.8 81.5 23.3 38.6 1.9 1.9 1 1.9 1.9 30 31 31 30 31 365 Jun 95 Jul 95 Aug 95 Sep 95 Oct 95 0 1.85 1 0 0 0 0 1.5 0 0 2.45 0 0 0 0 0 0.45 0.5 0 0 2.45 0.95 4.4 5.6 10.4 0 3.35 1 0 0 11.85 7.65 13.5 18.8 24.6 13.4 52.4 38.6 28.2 37.1 0.5 0 0 0 1.4 0 1.9 0.45 0 0 30 31 31 30 31 sum Jun 95 Jul 95 Aug 95 Sep 95 Oct 95 [ no./ year] 0 57.35 31 0 0 88.35 0 0 46.5 0 0 46.5 73.5 0 0 0 0 110.8333 0 13.95 15.5 0 0 15268.72 73.5 29.45 136.4 168 322.4 993.7833 0 103.85 31 0 0 134.85 355.5 237.15 418.5 564 762.6 6481.833 402 1624.4 1196.6 846 1150.1 6866.05 15 0 0 0 43.4 157.5333 0 58.9 13.95 0 0 72.85 25 Apr 96 08 May 96 22 May 96 06 Jun 96 22 Jun 96 08 Jul 96 19 Jul 96 06 Aug 96 29 Aug 96 0.9 341.6 23.8 4.9 10.1 1.4 2.9 3.7 11 9.8 7.1 4.7 1.7 29.1 38.5 83.3 7.4 14.7 12.7 17.8 10.2 4.3 22.4 72.8 42.1 22.1 33.1 36.3 29.4 22.3 23 6.7 0.7 1 0.9 30 31 31 30 31 365 Jun 95 Jul 95 Aug 95 Sep 95 Oct 95 0.45 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 16550.4 7.35 8.45 3.2 12.2 5.1 11.05 15.25 7.25 11.05 69.1 27.6 32.85 22.65 30.5 312.3 0 0 0.45 0 0 30 31 31 30 31 sum Jun 95 Jul 95 Aug 95 Sep 95 Oct 95 [ no./ year] 13.5 0 0 0 0 13.5 0 0 0 0513062.4 523968.3 220.5 261.95 99.2 366 158.1 1337.4 331.5 472.75 224.75 331.5 2142.1 8102.95 828 1018.35 702.15 915 9681.3 33757.65 0 0 13.95 0 0 140.8 23 Aug 95 20 Sep 95 03 Oct 95 18 Oct 95 0.9 1.8 2.8 11.3 8.8 30 0.9 0.9 9.4 7.8 10.9 4.6 9.4 5.9 11.8 8.3 30.1 22.5 56.3 apply survival rates [ no./ year] Little skate 0.0 American eel 12.8 Rainbow smelt 61.6 Atlantic cod 0.0 Atlantic tomcod 18.6 Red hake 14.0 Munnichog 0.0 Atlantic silversides 0.0 Threespine stickleback 0.0 Northern Pipefish 42.9 Grubby 48.7 Shorthorn sculpin 0.0 Lumpfish 0.0 Tautog 0.0 Cunner 0.0 Sand lance 0.0 Butterfish 0.0 Windowpane 0.0 Winter flounder 25.5 Yellow tail 0.0 16 Sep 96 29 Sep 96 18 Oct 96 2.6 2.6 7.7 2.6 2.6 235.5 5.1 2.6 2.6 12.8 10.2 5.1 6.8 4.1 1095.7 2.6 2 3.1 25.6 378.9 13.7 12.2 760.3 22.5 19.4 2555.1 apply survival rates [ no./ year] Little skate 80.6 American eel 85.3 Blueback herring 238.7 Alewife 80.6 Atlantic herring 80.6 Chain pickerel 15.5 Rainbow smelt 7300.5 Atlantic cod 0.0 Red hake 0.0 Munnichog 0.0 Atlantic silversides 396.8 Fourspine stickleback 0.0 Threespine stickleback 0.0 Blackspotted stickelbac 17.1 Northern pipfish 96.4 Northern searobin 158.1 Grubby 0.0 Lumpfish 0.0 Scup 80.6 Tautog 27.0 Cunner 131.3 Sand lance 0.0 Butterfish 0.0 Windowpane 0.0 Winter flounder 2643.8 23 Aug 95 20 Sep 95 03 Oct 95 18 Oct 95 0.9 5.6 9.9 10.9 9.2 18.8 25.5 23.7 38.6 28.2 31.4 42.8 1 1.8 0.9 16 Sep 96 29 Sep 96 18 Oct 96 16550.4 2 22.4 5.1 8.8 13.3 69.1 31.4 29.6 312.3 EGGS Entrainment name stage year impinged entrained Tautog/ Cunner eggs 1995 9,506,768 Tautog/ Cunner eggs 1996 14,377,716 Windowpane eggs 1995 2,730,318 Windowpane eggs 1996 3,070,083 Atlantic mackerel eggs 1995 4,934,309 Atlantic mackerel eggs 1996 10,942,871 LARVAE Entrainment name stage year impinged entrained Atlantic herring larvae 1995 32895.393 Atlantic herring larvae 1996 273571.76 Cunner larvae 1995 559221.68 Cunner larvae 1996 303968.63 Sand lance larvae 1995 526326.28 Sand lance larvae 1996 2279764.7 Atlantic mackerel larvae 1995 3815865.5 Atlantic mackerel larvae 1996 334365.49 Grubby larvae 1995 1085548 Grubby larvae 1996 6261753.7 Fourbeard rockling larvae 1995 263163.14 Fourbeard rockling larvae 1996 182381.18 Winter flounder larvae 1995 460535.5 Winter flounder larvae 1996 303968.63 Rock gunnel larvae 1995 230267.75 Rock gunnel larvae 1996 729524.7 RAW DATA Table 13 page 54 [ no./ 100m3] [ no/ day] [ no/ year] Tautog/ Cunner eggs 1995 28.9 26045.94 9,506,768 Tautog/ Cunner eggs 1996 47.3 39391 14,377,716 Windowpane eggs 1995 8.3 7480.322 2,730,318 Windowpane eggs 1996 10.1 8411.187 3,070,083 Atlantic mackerel eggs 1995 15 13518.65 4,934,309 Atlantic mackerel eggs 1996 36 29980.47 10,942,871 0 0 0 0 0 0 RAW DATA 0 Table 13 page 54 [ no./ 100m3] [ no/ day] [ no/ year] Atlantic herring larvae 1995 0.1 90.12436 32,895 Atlantic herring larvae 1996 0.9 749.5117 273,572 Cunner larvae 1995 1.7 1532.114 559,222 Cunner larvae 1996 1 832.7908 303,969 Sand lance larvae 1995 1.6 1441.99 526,326 Sand lance larvae 1996 7.5 6245.931 2,279,765 Atlantic mackerel larvae 1995 11.6 10454.43 3,815,866 Atlantic mackerel larvae 1996 1.1 916.0698 334,365 Grubby larvae 1995 3.3 2974.104 1,085,548 Grubby larvae 1996 20.6 17155.49 6,261,754 Fourbeard rockling larvae 1995 0.8 720.9949 263,163 Fourbeard rockling larvae 1996 0.6 499.6745 182,381 Winter flounder larvae 1995 1.4 1261.741 460,535 Winter flounder larvae 1996 1 832.7908 303,969 Rock gunnel larvae 1995 0.7 630.8705 230,268 Rock gunnel larvae 1996 2.4 1998.698 729,525 Needs to be checked COMPARISON Factor between the two results Compare results with Table 15 on page 56 1995 Flow Given estimates per year from the report [ MG/ day]

[ no/ year]

Atlantic mackerel eggs 1995 1,168,772 4.221789106 Atlantic mackerel eggs 1996 2,809,133 3.895461893 1996 Flow [ MG/ day]

COMPARISON Compare results with Table 15 on page 56 [ no/ year] Atlantic herring larvae 1995 14,949 2.200507903 Atlantic herring larvae 1996 60,261 4.539781349 Atlantic mackerel larvae 1995 1,543,701 2.471894199 Atlantic mackerel larvae 1996 104,810 3.190205984 Winter flounder larvae 1995 282776 1.628622999 Winter flounder larvae 1996 161160 1.886129477 30 31 31 28 31 30 31 30 31 Nov 94 Dec 94 Jan 95 Feb 95 Mar 95 Apr 95 May 95 Jun 95 Jul 95 15 28.2 28.7 31.2 26.3 21.9 21 23.9 23.1 30 31 31 28 31 30 31 30 31 Nov 94 Dec 94 Jan 95 Feb 95 Mar 95 Apr 95 May 95 Jun 95 Jul 95 21.8 21.1 21.1 20.9 20.9 21.9 21.2 22.4 24.6 31 30 31 Avarege Avarege Avarege Aug 95 Sep 95 Oct 95 [ MG/ day] [ Mm3/ day] [ m3/ day] 23 21.4 22 23.80833333 0.090124 90124.36 Total avarege [ Mm3/ day] 22.90417 31 30 31 Avarege Avarege Avarege Aug 95 Sep 95 Oct 95 [ MG/ day] [ Mm3/ day] [ m3/ day] 23.4 21.3 23.4 22 0.083279 83279.08


[Federal Register Volume 81, Number 8 (Wednesday, January 13, 2016)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Pages 1526-1531]
[FR Doc No: 2016-00534]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY

40 CFR Part 180

[EPA-HQ-OPP-2014-0680; FRL-9940-90]

Propyzamide; Pesticide Tolerances

AGENCY: Environmental Protection Agency (EPA).

ACTION: Final rule.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: This regulation establishes a tolerance for residues of
propyzamide, also known as pronamide, in or on leaf lettuce. Dow
AgroSciences, LLC requested this tolerance under the Federal Food,
Drug, and Cosmetic Act (FFDCA).

DATES: This regulation is effective January 13, 2016. Objections and
requests for hearings must be received on or before March 14, 2016, and
must be filed in accordance with the instructions provided in 40 CFR
part 178 (see also Unit I.C. of the SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION).

ADDRESSES: The docket for this action, identified by docket
identification (ID) number EPA-HQ-OPP-2014-0680, is available at http://www.regulations.gov or at the Office of Pesticide Programs Regulatory
Public Docket (OPP Docket) in the Environmental Protection Agency
Docket Center (EPA/DC), West William Jefferson Clinton Bldg., Rm. 3334,
1301 Constitution Ave. NW., Washington, DC 20460-0001. The Public
Reading Room is open from 8:30 a.m. to 4:30 p.m., Monday through
Friday, excluding legal holidays. The telephone number for the Public
Reading Room is<PHONE_NUMBER>, and the telephone number for the OPP
Docket is<PHONE_NUMBER>. Please review the visitor instructions and
additional information about the docket available at http://www.epa.gov/dockets.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Susan Lewis, Registration Division
(7505P), Office of Pesticide Programs, Environmental Protection Agency,
1200 Pennsylvania Ave. NW., Washington, DC 20460-0001; main telephone
number:<PHONE_NUMBER>; email address<EMAIL_ADDRESS>
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

I. General Information

A. Does this action apply to me?

    You may be potentially affected by this action if you are an
agricultural producer, food manufacturer, or pesticide manufacturer.
The following list of North American Industrial Classification System
(NAICS) codes is not intended to be exhaustive, but rather provides a
guide to help readers determine whether this document applies to them.
Potentially affected entities may include:
     Crop production (NAICS code 111).
     Animal production (NAICS code 112).
     Food manufacturing (NAICS code 311).
     Pesticide manufacturing (NAICS code 32532).

B. How can I get electronic access to other related information?

    You may access a frequently updated electronic version of EPA's
tolerance regulations at 40 CFR part 180 through the Government
Printing Office's e-CFR site at http://www.ecfr.gov/cgi-bin/text-idx?&c=ecfr&tpl=/ecfrbrowse/Title40/40tab_02.tpl. To access the OCSPP
test guidelines referenced in this document electronically, please go
to http://www.epa.gov/test-guidelines-pesticides-and-toxic-substances.

C. How can I file an objection or hearing request?

    Under FFDCA section 408(g), 21 U.S.C. 346a, any person may file an
objection to any aspect of this regulation and may also request a
hearing on those objections. You must file your objection or request a
hearing on this regulation in accordance with the instructions provided
in 40 CFR part 178. To ensure proper receipt by EPA, you must identify
the request by the docket ID number EPA-HQ-OPP-2014-0680 in the subject
line on the first page of your submission. All objections and requests
for a hearing must be in writing, and must be received by the Hearing
Clerk on or before March 14, 2016. Addresses for mail and hand delivery
of objections and hearing requests are provided in 40 CFR 178.25(b).
    In addition to filing an objection or hearing request with the
Hearing Clerk as described in 40 CFR part 178, please submit a copy of
the filing (excluding any Confidential Business Information (CBI)) for
inclusion in the public docket. Information not marked confidential
pursuant to 40 CFR part 2 may be disclosed publicly by EPA without
prior notice. Submit the non-CBI copy of your objection or hearing
request, identified by docket ID number EPA-HQ-OPP-2014-0680, by one of
the following methods:
     Federal eRulemaking Portal: http://www.regulations.gov.
Follow the online instructions for submitting comments. Do not submit
electronically any information you consider to be CBI or other
information whose disclosure is restricted by statute.
     Mail: OPP Docket, Environmental Protection Agency Docket
Center (EPA/DC), (28221T), 1200 Pennsylvania Ave. NW., Washington, DC
20460-0001.
     Hand Delivery: To make special arrangements for hand
delivery or

delivery of boxed information, please follow the instructions at http://www.epa.gov/dockets/contacts.html.
    Additional instructions on commenting or visiting the docket, along
with more information about dockets generally, is available at http://www.epa.gov/dockets.

II. Summary of Petitioned-For Tolerance

    In the Federal Register of Wednesday, December 17, 2014 (79 FR
75109) (FRL-9918-90), EPA issued a document pursuant to FFDCA section
408(d)(3), 21 U.S.C. 346a(d)(3), announcing the filing of a pesticide
petition (PP 4F8301) by Dow AgroSciences, LLC, 9330 Zionsville Rd.,
Indianapolis, IN 46268-1054. The petition requested that 40 CFR 180.317
be amended by establishing a tolerance for residues of the herbicide
pronamide (propyzamide) and its metabolite containing the 3,5-
dichlorobenzoyl moiety calculated as 3,5-dichloro-N-(1,1-dimethyl-2-
propynyl)benzamide, in or on lettuce, leaf at 1.0 part per million
(ppm). That document referenced a summary of the petition prepared by
Dow AgroSciences, LLC, the registrant, which is available in the docket
EPA-HQ-OPP-2014-0680 at http://www.regulations.gov. There were no
comments received in response to the notice of filing.

III. Aggregate Risk Assessment and Determination of Safety

    Section 408(b)(2)(A)(i) of FFDCA allows EPA to establish a
tolerance (the legal limit for a pesticide chemical residue in or on a
food) only if EPA determines that the tolerance is ``safe''. Section
408(b)(2)(A)(ii) of FFDCA defines ``safe'' to mean that ``there is a
reasonable certainty that no harm will result from aggregate exposure
to the pesticide chemical residue, including all anticipated dietary
exposures and all other exposures for which there is reliable
information''. This includes exposure through drinking water and in
residential settings, but does not include occupational exposure.
Section 408(b)(2)(C) of FFDCA requires EPA to give special
consideration to exposure of infants and children to the pesticide
chemical residue in establishing a tolerance and to ``ensure that there
is a reasonable certainty that no harm will result to infants and
children from aggregate exposure to the pesticide chemical residue * *
*.''
    Consistent with FFDCA section 408(b)(2)(D), and the factors
specified in FFDCA section 408(b)(2)(D), EPA has reviewed the available
scientific data and other relevant information in support of this
action. EPA has sufficient data to assess the hazards of and to make a
determination on aggregate exposure for propyzamide including exposure
resulting from the tolerance established by this action. EPA's
assessment of exposures and risks associated with propyzamide follows.

A. Toxicological Profile

    EPA has evaluated the available toxicity data and considered its
validity, completeness, and reliability as well as the relationship of
the results of the studies to human risk. EPA has also considered
available information concerning the variability of the sensitivities
of major identifiable subgroups of consumers, including infants and
children.
    Propyzamide has low acute toxicity via the oral, dermal, and
inhalation routes of exposure, is non-irritating to the eyes or skin,
and is not a dermal sensitizer.
    The primary target organ for propyzamide is the liver. There are
other target organs as well, including the thyroid, testes, and
pituitary, but effects on these organs are secondary to primary effects
on the liver. Liver-related effects include increases in absolute and
relative liver weights, hypertrophy, elevated levels of enzymes
associated with liver damage, and histopathology of liver cells.
Adverse liver effects were consistently observed in every animal
species studied, with progression towards more severe effects over time
ultimately leading to tumorigenesis in rats and mice. Based on the
studies submitted, the rat is the most sensitive species. In most
studies, there is no gender sensitivity in response to propyzamide.
    Propyzamide is a carcinogen in rats and mice, causing liver tumors
in mice, thyroid tumors in male rats, and testicular tumors in rats.
Based on MOA studies, tumorigenesis for all three tumor types has been
shown to be mediated by liver enzymes induced in response to treatment
with propyzamide. In mice, the MOA data clearly show rapid induction of
Cyp2b10 associated with the constitutive androstane nuclear receptor
(CAR), as well as induction of peroxisomes and peroxisomal enzymes such
as Cyp4a10 associated with a second nuclear receptor, PPAR-[alpha].
Induction of the nuclear receptors leads to mitogenesis followed by
hepatocellular proliferation and eventually, liver tumors.
    In rats, propyzamide induces Cyp2b1 200-fold over background
levels, but has no effect on other CYPs commonly associated with
carcinogenic modes of action. In the rat Cyp2b1 is a biological marker
for the CAR receptor. The CAR pathway is associated with the activation
of uridine diphosphate glucuronyl transferase (UGT) which catalyzes the
condensation of glucuronic acid with thyroxine (T4), leading to
enhanced biliary excretion of T4. Eventually the continued stimulus to
produce more T4 leads to the formation of thyroid follicular tumors. In
male rats, the tumorigenic dose of propyzamide for both thyroid tumors
and Leydig cell tumors is 1,000 ppm in the diet (34-75 mg/kg/day based
on age of the rats). Tumor precursor effects such as decreases in T4
levels, increases in liver weight, liver hypertrophy, and elevated
testosterone metabolism occur at doses below or equivalent to the
tumorigenic dose.
    In nearly every oral repeated-dose study of propyzamide as well as
in the 28-day dermal toxicity study in rats, there were dose-related
decreases in body weight, body weight gain, and food consumption.
Typically, these effects on body weight occurred at or above effects on
the liver such as hypertrophy or increases in liver weight.
    There was evidence of neurotoxicity in rats based on an increase in
landing foot splay in females and decreases in motor activity in both
genders in the acute neurotoxicity study. In the subchronic
neurotoxicity study however, there was no evidence of neurotoxicity
following dietary administration, and only body-weight effects were
observed. There was no evidence of neurotoxicity in the rest of the
toxicology database across other species or other strains of rat. There
was no evidence of immunotoxicity.
    There was no evidence of quantitative or qualitative increased
susceptibility in the fetuses or the offspring of rats or rabbits
following pre- and/or postnatal exposure to propyzamide. In the
prenatal developmental toxicity study in rabbits and the multi-
generation reproduction study in rats, any observed toxicity to the
fetuses or offspring occurred at equivalent or higher doses than
effects to parental animals.
    Specific information on the studies received and the nature of the
adverse effects caused by propyzamide as well as the no-observed-
adverse-effect-level (NOAEL) and the lowest-observed-adverse-effect-
level (LOAEL) from the toxicity studies can be found at http://www.regulations.gov in document ``Pronamide Human Health Risk
Assessment for Registration Review and to Support New Section 3 Use on
Leaf Lettuce (Revised)'' on pages 14-22 in docket ID number EPA-HQ-OPP-
2014-0680.

B. Toxicological Points of Departure/Levels of Concern

    Once a pesticide's toxicological profile is determined, EPA
identifies toxicological points of departure (POD) and levels of
concern to use in evaluating the risk posed by human exposure to the
pesticide. For hazards that have a threshold below which there is no
appreciable risk, the toxicological POD is used as the basis for
derivation of reference values for risk assessment. PODs are developed
based on a careful analysis of the doses in each toxicological study to
determine the dose at which no adverse effects are observed (the NOAEL)
and the lowest dose at which adverse effects of concern are identified
(the LOAEL). Uncertainty/safety factors are used in conjunction with
the POD to calculate a safe exposure level--generally referred to as a
population-adjusted dose (PAD) or a reference dose (RfD)--and a safe
margin of exposure (MOE). For non-threshold risks, the Agency assumes
that any amount of exposure will lead to some degree of risk. Thus, the
Agency estimates risk in terms of the probability of an occurrence of
the adverse effect expected in a lifetime. For more information on the
general principles EPA uses in risk characterization and a complete
description of the risk assessment process, see http://www.epa.gov/pesticides-science-and-assessing-pesticide-risks/assessing-human-health-risk-pesticides.
    A summary of the toxicological endpoints for propyzamide used for
human risk assessment is shown in Table 1 of this unit.

  Table 1--Summary of Toxicological Doses and Endpoints for Propyzamide for Use in Human Health Risk Assessment
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
                                    Point of departure
        Exposure/Scenario            and uncertainty/     RfD, PAD, LOC for     Study and toxicological effects
                                      safety factors       risk assessment
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Acute dietary (All populations)..  LOAEL = 40 mg/kg/day  Acute RfD = 0.04 mg/ Acute Neurotoxicity Rat Study
                                   UFA = 10x...........   kg/day.             No NOAEL established.
                                   UFH = 10x...........  aPAD = 0.04 mg/kg/   LOAEL = 40 mg/kg/day based on
                                   UFL = 10x...........   day.                 increased landing foot splay and
                                   FQPA SF = 1x........                        decreased motor activity.
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Acute dietary (Females 13-49          No endpoint attributable to a single exposure was identified, including
 years of age).                                  developmental toxicity studies in rats and rabbits.
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Chronic dietary (All populations)  LOAEL = 40 mg/kg/day  Chronic RfD = 0.04   POD = 4 mg/kg/day based on a
                                   UFA = 10x...........   mg/kg/day.           weight-of-evidence approach from
                                   UFH = 10x...........  cPAD = 0.04 mg/kg/    the following rat studies:
                                   UFL = 10x...........   day.                Acute Neurotoxicity Study.
                                   FQPA SF = 1x........                       No NOAEL established.
                                                                              LOAEL = 40 mg/kg/day based on
                                                                               increased landing foot splay and
                                                                               decreased motor activity
                                                                              POD = 4 mg/kg/day (LOAEL of 40 mg/
                                                                               kg/day /10x UFL)
                                                                              Subchronic Neurotoxicity Study
                                                                              NOAEL = 2.38 mg/kg/day LOAEL =
                                                                               11.28 mg/kg/day based on
                                                                               significant decreases in body
                                                                               weight, body weight gain, and
                                                                               food consumption in males
                                                                              Combined Chronic Toxicity/
                                                                               Carcinogenicity Study
                                                                              NOAEL = 8.46/10.69 mg/kg/day
                                                                              LOAEL = 42.59/55.09 mg/kg/day
                                                                               based on increased relative liver
                                                                               weight and histopathological
                                                                               lesions in the liver, thyroid,
                                                                               and ovaries
                                                                              Male Pubertal Study
                                                                              NOAEL = 2.5 mg/kg/day
                                                                              LOAEL = 10 mg/kg/day based on
                                                                               decreased serum T4
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Incidental oral short-term (1 to   LOAEL = 40 mg/kg/day  LOC for MOE = 1,000  Same as Chronic dietary section
 30 days).                                                                     above
                                   UFA = 10x
                                   UFH = 10x...........
                                   UFL = 10x...........
                                   FQPA SF = 1x........
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Dermal short-term (1 to 30 days)   NOAEL = 100 mg/kg/    LOC for MOE = 100..  Subchronic Dermal Toxicity Rat
 and intermediate-term (1 to 6      day (dermal                                Study
 months).                           absorption rate =                         LOAEL = 500 mg/kg/day based on
                                    24%).                                      decreases in body weight and food
                                                                               consumption
                                   UFA = 10x
                                   UFH = 10x...........
                                   FQPA SF = 1x........
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Cancer (oral, dermal, inhalation)   Classification: ``Not Likely to be Carcinogenic to Humans'' at doses that do
                                     not result in induction of hepatic cell proliferation or metabolic enzymes
                                             leading to disruption of thyroid or gonadal endocrine axes.
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
FQPA SF = Food Quality Protection Act Safety Factor. LOAEL = lowest-observed-adverse-effect-level. LOC = level
  of concern. mg/kg/day = milligram/kilogram/day. MOE = margin of exposure. NOAEL = no-observed-adverse-effect-
  level. PAD = population adjusted dose (a = acute, c = chronic). RfD = reference dose. UF = uncertainty factor.
  UFA = extrapolation from animal to human (interspecies). UFH = potential variation in sensitivity among
  members of the human population (intraspecies). UFL = use of a LOAEL to extrapolate a NOAEL.

C. Exposure Assessment

    1. Dietary exposure from food and feed uses. In evaluating dietary
exposure to propyzamide, EPA considered exposure under the petitioned-
for tolerance as well as all existing propyzamide tolerances in 40 CFR
180.317. EPA assessed dietary exposures from propyzamide in food as
follows:
    i. Acute exposure. Quantitative acute dietary exposure and risk
assessments are performed for a food-use pesticide, if a toxicological
study has indicated the possibility of an effect of concern occurring
as a result of a 1-day or single exposure. Such effects were identified
for propyzamide. In estimating acute dietary exposure, EPA used food
consumption information from the United States Department of
Agriculture (USDA) 2003-2008 National Health and Nutrition Examination
Survey, What We Eat in America (NHANES/WWEIA). As to residue levels in
food, EPA assumed that propyzamide residues were present at tolerance
levels in all commodities for which tolerances have been established or
proposed, and that 100% of the crops were treated with propyzamide.
    ii. Chronic exposure. In conducting the chronic dietary exposure
assessment EPA used the food consumption data from the USDA 2003-2008
National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey, What We Eat in
America (NHANES/WWEIA). As to residue levels in food, EPA assumed that
propyzamide residues were present at tolerance levels in all
commodities for which tolerances have been established or proposed, and
that 100% of the crops were treated with propyzamide.
    iii. Cancer. Based on the data summarized in Unit III.A., EPA has
concluded that propyzamide does not pose a cancer risk to humans at
doses that do not result in induction of hepatic cell proliferation or
metabolic enzymes leading to disruption of thyroid or gonadal
endrocrine axes. The MOAs were adequately supported by studies that
clearly identified the sequence of key events, dose-response
concordance and temporal relationship to the particular tumor type.
Quantification of carcinogenic risk is not required. The chronic RfD
would be protective of both carcinogenic and non-carcinogenic effects
observed in the mouse and rat carcinogenicity studies and MOA studies
conducted at higher doses. Therefore, a dietary exposure assessment for
the purpose of assessing cancer risk is unnecessary.
    iv. Anticipated residue and percent crop treated (PCT) information.
EPA did not use anticipated residue and/or PCT information in the
dietary assessment for propyzamide. Tolerance-level residues and 100
PCT were assumed for all food commodities.
    2. Dietary exposure from drinking water. The Agency used Tier II
screening level water exposure models in the dietary exposure analysis
and risk assessment for propyzamide in drinking water. These simulation
models take into account data on the physical, chemical, and fate/
transport characteristics of propyzamide. Further information regarding
EPA drinking water models used in pesticide exposure assessment can be
found at http://www.epa.gov/pesticide-science-and-assessing-pesticide-risks/about-water-exposure-models-used-pesticide.
    Based on the Tier II Surface Water Concentration Calculator (SWCC)
and Pesticide Root Zone Model Ground Water (PRZM-GW), the estimated
drinking water concentrations (EDWCs) of propyzamide for acute
exposures are estimated to be 102 parts per billion (ppb) for surface
water and 21 ppb for ground water; for chronic exposures for non-cancer
assessments are estimated to be 47 ppb for surface water and 18.6 ppb
for ground water.
    Modeled estimates of drinking water concentrations were directly
entered into the dietary exposure model. For acute dietary risk
assessment, the water concentration value of 102 ppb was used to assess
the contribution to drinking water. For chronic dietary risk
assessment, the water concentration of value 47 ppb was used to assess
the contribution to drinking water.
    3. From non-dietary exposure. The term ``residential exposure'' is
used in this document to refer to non-occupational, non-dietary
exposure (e.g., for lawn and garden pest control, indoor pest control,
termiticides, and flea and tick control on pets). Propyzamide is
currently registered for the following uses that could result in
residential exposures: Turf grass and golf courses. EPA assessed
residential exposure using the following assumptions: Post-application
dermal and incidental oral exposures for children 1 to < 2 years old
(physical activities on turf and hand-to-mouth ingestion of treated
soil); and post-application dermal exposure for children 6 to < 11
years old (golfing), children 11 to < 16 years old (golfing and
mowing), and adults (golfing, mowing, and physical activities on turf).
Further information regarding EPA standard assumptions and generic
inputs for residential exposures may be found at http://www.epa.gov/pesticide-science-and-assessing-pesticide-risks/standard-operating-procedures-residential-pesticide.
    4. Cumulative effects from substances with a common mechanism of
toxicity. Section 408(b)(2)(D)(v) of FFDCA requires that, when
considering whether to establish, modify, or revoke a tolerance, the
Agency consider ``available information'' concerning the cumulative
effects of a particular pesticide's residues and ``other substances
that have a common mechanism of toxicity.''
    EPA has not found propyzamide to share a common mechanism of
toxicity with any other substances, and propyzamide does not appear to
produce a toxic metabolite produced by other substances. For the
purposes of this tolerance action, therefore, EPA has assumed that
propyzamide does not have a common mechanism of toxicity with other
substances. For information regarding EPA's efforts to determine which
chemicals have a common mechanism of toxicity and to evaluate

the cumulative effects of such chemicals, see EPA's Web site at http://www.epa.gov/pesticide-science-and-assessing-pesticide-risks/cumulative-assessment-risk-pesticides.

D. Safety Factor for Infants and Children

    1. In general. Section 408(b)(2)(C) of FFDCA provides that EPA
shall apply an additional tenfold (10X) margin of safety for infants
and children in the case of threshold effects to account for prenatal
and postnatal toxicity and the completeness of the database on toxicity
and exposure unless EPA determines based on reliable data that a
different margin of safety will be safe for infants and children. This
additional margin of safety is commonly referred to as the FQPA Safety
Factor (SF). In applying this provision, EPA either retains the default
value of 10X, or uses a different additional safety factor when
reliable data available to EPA support the choice of a different
factor.
    2. Prenatal and postnatal sensitivity. There was no evidence of
quantitative or qualitative increased susceptibility in developing
fetuses or in offspring of rats or rabbits following prenatal and/or
postnatal exposure to propyzamide.
    3. Conclusion. EPA has determined that reliable data show the
safety of infants and children would be adequately protected if the
FQPA SF was reduced to 1X. This decision is based on the following
findings:
    i. The toxicity database for propyzamide is complete.
    ii. There is no need for a developmental neurotoxicity study or
additional UFs to account for neurotoxicity despite evidence of
neurotoxicity in the acute study based on the increase in landing foot
splay in female rats and the decrease in motor activity seen in both
genders on day 1. This decision is based on no evidence of
neurotoxicity in the subchronic study at dose levels tested via
different routes of administration, and no evidence of neurotoxicity in
the rest of the toxicology database across other species and other
strains of rat.
    iii. There is no evidence that propyzamide results in increased
susceptibility in in utero rabbits in the prenatal developmental
toxicity study or in young rats in the two-generation reproduction
study.
    iv. There are no residual uncertainties identified in the exposure
databases. The dietary food exposure assessments were performed based
on 100 PCT and tolerance-level residues. EPA made conservative
(protective) assumptions in the ground and surface water modeling used
to assess exposure to propyzamide in drinking water. EPA used similarly
conservative assumptions to assess post-application exposure of
children as well as incidental oral exposure of toddlers. These
assessments will not underestimate the exposure and risks posed by
propyzamide.

E. Aggregate Risks and Determination of Safety

    EPA determines whether acute and chronic dietary pesticide
exposures are safe by comparing aggregate exposure estimates to the
acute PAD (aPAD) and chronic PAD (cPAD). For linear cancer risks, EPA
calculates the lifetime probability of acquiring cancer given the
estimated aggregate exposure. Short-, intermediate-, and chronic-term
risks are evaluated by comparing the estimated aggregate food, water,
and residential exposure to the appropriate PODs to ensure that an
adequate MOE exists.
    1. Acute risk. Using the exposure assumptions discussed in this
unit for acute exposure, the acute dietary exposure from food and water
to propyzamide will occupy 46% of the aPAD for all infants < 1 year
old, the population subgroup receiving the greatest exposure.
    2. Chronic risk. Using the exposure assumptions described in this
unit for chronic exposure, EPA has concluded that chronic dietary
exposure to propyzamide from food and water will utilize 11% of the
cPAD for children 1 to 2 years old, the population subgroup receiving
the greatest exposure. Based on the explanation in Unit III.C.3.
regarding residential use patterns, chronic residential exposure to
residues of propyzamide is not expected.
    3. Short-term risk. Short-term aggregate exposure takes into
account short-term residential exposure plus chronic exposure to food
and water (considered to be background exposure level). Propyzamide is
currently registered for uses that could result in short-term
residential exposure, and the Agency has determined that it is
appropriate to aggregate chronic exposure through food and water with
short-term residential exposures.
    Using the exposure assumptions described in this unit for short-
term exposures, EPA has concluded that the combined short-term food,
water, and residential exposure results in an aggregate MOE of 1,700
for children 1 to < 2 years old (chronic dietary exposure with post-
application incidental oral exposure from turf use). Because EPA's
level of concern for propyzamide is a MOE of 1,000 or below, this MOE
is not of concern.
    4. Intermediate-term risk. Intermediate-term aggregate exposure
takes into account intermediate-term residential exposure plus chronic
exposure to food and water (considered to be background exposure
level). Propyzamide is currently registered for uses that could result
in intermediate-term residential exposure. However, since the maximum
single and yearly application rates are the same, the short-term
assessment is protective of intermediate-term incidental oral exposure.
    5. Aggregate cancer risk for U.S. population. As discussed in Unit
III.C.iii., Propyzamide is classified as ``Not Likely to be
Carcinogenic to Humans'' at doses that do not result in induction of
hepatic cell proliferation or metabolic enzymes leading to disruption
of thyroid or gonadal endocrine axes. Therefore, quantification of
aggregate cancer risk is not required.
    6. Determination of safety. Based on these risk assessments, EPA
concludes that there is a reasonable certainty that no harm will result
to the general population, or to infants and children from aggregate
exposure to propyzamide residues.

IV. Other Considerations

A. Analytical Enforcement Methodology

    Adequate enforcement methodologies are available to enforce the
tolerance expression of residues in/on plant commodities (PAM II Method
I, using gas-liquid chromatography with electron-capture detection
(GLC/ECD)) and livestock commodities (Method GRM 02.21, using gas
chromatography with negative-ion chemical ionization mass spectrometry
detection (GC/MS)). These methods may be requested from: Chief,
Analytical Chemistry Branch, Environmental Science Center, 701 Mapes
Rd., Ft. Meade, MD 20755-5350; telephone number:<PHONE_NUMBER>; email
address<EMAIL_ADDRESS>
B. International Residue Limits

    In making its tolerance decisions, EPA seeks to harmonize U.S.
tolerances with international standards whenever possible, consistent
with U.S. food safety standards and agricultural practices. EPA
considers the international maximum residue limits (MRLs) established
by the Codex Alimentarius Commission (Codex), as required by FFDCA
section 408(b)(4). The Codex Alimentarius is a joint United Nations
Food and Agriculture Organization/World Health Organization food
standards program,

and it is recognized as an international food safety standards-setting
organization in trade agreements to which the United States is a party.
EPA may establish a tolerance that is different from a Codex MRL;
however, FFDCA section 408(b)(4) requires that EPA explain the reasons
for departing from the Codex level. The Codex has not established any
MRLs for propyzamide.

V. Conclusion

    Therefore, tolerances are established for residues of propyzamide
(pronamide), 3,5-dichloro-N-(1,1-dimethyl-2-propynyl)benzamide, in or
on lettuce, leaf at 1.0 ppm.

VI. Statutory and Executive Order Reviews

    This action establishes a tolerance under FFDCA section 408(d) in
response to a petition submitted to the Agency. The Office of
Management and Budget (OMB) has exempted these types of actions from
review under Executive Order 12866, entitled ``Regulatory Planning and
Review'' (58 FR 51735, October 4, 1993). Because this action has been
exempted from review under Executive Order 12866, this action is not
subject to Executive Order 13211, entitled ``Actions Concerning
Regulations That Significantly Affect Energy Supply, Distribution, or
Use'' (66 FR 28355, May 22, 2001) or Executive Order 13045, entitled
``Protection of Children from Environmental Health Risks and Safety
Risks'' (62 FR 19885, April 23, 1997). This action does not contain any
information collections subject to OMB approval under the Paperwork
Reduction Act (PRA) (44 U.S.C. 3501 et seq.), nor does it require any
special considerations under Executive Order 12898, entitled ``Federal
Actions to Address Environmental Justice in Minority Populations and
Low-Income Populations'' (59 FR 7629, February 16, 1994).
    Since tolerances and exemptions that are established on the basis
of a petition under FFDCA section 408(d), such as the tolerance in this
final rule, do not require the issuance of a proposed rule, the
requirements of the Regulatory Flexibility Act (RFA) (5 U.S.C. 601 et
seq.), do not apply.
    This action directly regulates growers, food processors, food
handlers, and food retailers, not States or tribes, nor does this
action alter the relationships or distribution of power and
responsibilities established by Congress in the preemption provisions
of FFDCA section 408(n)(4). As such, the Agency has determined that
this action will not have a substantial direct effect on States or
tribal governments, on the relationship between the national government
and the States or tribal governments, or on the distribution of power
and responsibilities among the various levels of government or between
the Federal Government and Indian tribes. Thus, the Agency has
determined that Executive Order 13132, entitled ``Federalism'' (64 FR
43255, August 10, 1999) and Executive Order 13175, entitled
``Consultation and Coordination with Indian Tribal Governments'' (65 FR
67249, November 9, 2000) do not apply to this action. In addition, this
action does not impose any enforceable duty or contain any unfunded
mandate as described under Title II of the Unfunded Mandates Reform Act
(UMRA) (2 U.S.C. 1501 et seq.).
    This action does not involve any technical standards that would
require Agency consideration of voluntary consensus standards pursuant
to section 12(d) of the National Technology Transfer and Advancement
Act (NTTAA) (15 U.S.C. 272 note).

VII. Congressional Review Act

    Pursuant to the Congressional Review Act (5 U.S.C. 801 et seq.),
EPA will submit a report containing this rule and other required
information to the U.S. Senate, the U.S. House of Representatives, and
the Comptroller General of the United States prior to publication of
the rule in the Federal Register. This action is not a ``major rule''
as defined by 5 U.S.C. 804(2).

List of Subjects in 40 CFR Part 180

    Environmental protection, Administrative practice and procedure,
Agricultural commodities, Pesticides and pests, Reporting and
recordkeeping requirements.

    Dated: December 31, 2015.
Susan Lewis,
Director, Registration Division, Office of Pesticide Programs.

    Therefore, 40 CFR chapter I is amended as follows:

PART 180--[AMENDED]

0
1. The authority citation for part 180 continues to read as follows:

    Authority: 21 U.S.C. 321(q), 346a and 371.

0
2. In Sec.  180.317, add alphabetically ``Lettuce, leaf'' to the table
in paragraph (a) to read as follows:

Sec.  180.317  Propyzamide; tolerances for residues.

    (a) * * *

------------------------------------------------------------------------
                                                             Parts per
                        Commodity                             million
------------------------------------------------------------------------

                                * * * * *
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Lettuce, leaf...........................................             1.0
------------------------------------------------------------------------

                                * * * * *
------------------------------------------------------------------------

* * * * *
[FR Doc. 2016-00534 Filed 1-12-16; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6560-50-P