[Federal Register Volume 84, Number 22 (Friday, February 1, 2019)]
[Notices]
[Page 1261]
[FR Doc No: 2019-00625]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

[SEC File No. 270-123, OMB Control No. 3235-0105]

Submission for OMB Review; Comment Request

Upon Written Request Copies Available From: Securities and Exchange
Commission, Office of FOIA Services, 100 F Street NE, Washington, DC
20549-2736.

Extension:
    Form T-3.

    Notice is hereby given that, pursuant to the Paperwork Reduction
Act of 1995 (44 U.S.C. 3501 et seq.), the Securities and Exchange
Commission (``Commission'') has submitted to the Office of Management
and Budget this request for extension of the previously approved
collections of information discussed below.
    Form T-3 (17 CFR 269.3) is an application for qualification of an
indenture under the Trust Indenture Act of 1939 (15 U.S.C. 77aaa et
seq.). The information provided under Form T-3 is used by the
Commission to determine whether to qualify an indenture relating to an
offering of debt securities that is not required to be registered under
the Securities Act of 1933 (15 U.S.C. 77a et seq.). Form T-3 is filed
on occasion. The information required by Form T-3 is mandatory. This
information is publicly available on EDGAR. Form T-3 takes
approximately 43 hours per response to prepare and is filed by
approximately 16 respondents. We estimate that 25% of the 43 hours per
response (11 hours) is prepared by the filer for a total annual
reporting burden of 176 hours (11 hours per response x 16 responses).
    An agency may not conduct or sponsor, and a person is not required
to respond to, a collection of information unless it displays a
currently valid control number.
    The public may view the background documentation for this
information collection at the following website, www.reginfo.gov.
Comments should be directed to: (i) Desk Officer for the Securities and
Exchange Commission, Office of Information and Regulatory Affairs,
Office of Management and Budget, Room 10102, New Executive Office
Building, Washington, DC 20503, or by sending an email to:
<EMAIL_ADDRESS>and (ii) Charles Riddle, Acting Director/
Chief Information Officer, Securities and Exchange Commission, c/o
Candace Kenner, 100 F Street NE, Washington, DC 20549 or send an email
to<EMAIL_ADDRESS>Comments must be submitted to OMB within 30
days of this notice.

    Dated: January 29, 2019.
Eduardo A. Aleman,
Deputy Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2019-00625 Filed 1-31-19; 8:45 am]
 BILLING CODE 8011-01-P


[Federal Register: July 10, 2008 (Volume 73, Number 133)]
[Notices]
[Page 39767-39769]
[DOCID:fr10jy08-121]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

[Release No. 34-58085; File No. SR-NYSEArca-2008-68]

Self-Regulatory Organizations; NYSE Arca, Inc.; Notice of Filing
and Immediate Effectiveness of Proposed Rule Change To Extend the One
Week Option Series Pilot Program Through July 12, 2009

July 2, 2008.
    Pursuant to Section 19(b)(1) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934
(``Act'') \1\ and Rule 19b-4 thereunder,\2\ notice is hereby given that
on June 24, 2008, NYSE Arca, Inc. (``NYSE Arca'' or ``Exchange'') filed
with the Securities and Exchange Commission (``Commission'') the
proposed rule change as described in Items I and II below, which Items
have been substantially prepared by the Exchange. The Exchange has
designated this proposal as non-controversial under Section
19(b)(3)(A)(iii) of the Act \3\ and Rule 19b-4(f)(6) thereunder,\4\
which renders the proposed rule change effective upon filing with the
Commission. The Commission is publishing this notice to solicit
comments on the proposed rule change from interested persons.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \1\ 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(1).
    \2\ 17 CFR 240.19b-4.
    \3\ 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(3)(A)(iii).
    \4\ 17 CFR 240.19b-4(f)(6).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

I. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement of the Terms of Substance
of the Proposed Rule Change

    NYSE Arca proposes to amend its rules to extend the One Week Option
Series pilot program (``Pilot Program'') for an additional year,
through July 12, 2009. The text of the proposed rule change is
available on the Exchange's Web site at (http://www.nyse.com), at the
Exchange's principal office, and at the Commission's Public Reference
Room.

II. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement of the Purpose of, and
Statutory Basis for, the Proposed Rule Change

    In its filing with the Commission, the Exchange included statements
concerning the purpose of, and basis for, the proposed rule change and
discussed any comments it received on the proposed rule change. The
text of these statements may be examined at the places specified in
Item IV below. The Exchange has prepared summaries, set forth in
sections A, B, and C below, of the most significant aspects of such
statements.

A. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement of the Purpose of, and
Statutory Basis for, the Proposed Rule Change

1. Purpose
    On July 12, 2005 the Commission approved the Pilot Program \5\
permitting NYSE Arca to list and trade One Week Option Series. Under
the terms of the Pilot Program, the Exchange can select up to five
options classes on which One Week Option Series may be opened on any
One Week Option Opening Date. The Exchange also may list One Week
Option Series on any options class that is selected by other securities
exchanges

that employ a similar Pilot Program under their respective rules.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \5\ See Securities Exchange Act Release No. 52013 (July 12,
2005), 70 FR 41471 (July 19, 2005) (SR-PCX-2005-32).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    The purpose of this proposal is to extend the Pilot Program for one
year, through July 12, 2009. The current Pilot Program expires on July
12, 2008.\6\ The Exchange believes that One Week Term Option Series can
provide investors with a flexible and valuable tool to manage risk
exposure, minimize capital outlays, and be more responsive to the
timing of events affecting the securities that underlie options
contracts. Although NYSE Arca has not listed any One Week Option Series
during the Pilot Program, there has been investor interest in trading
short-term options at the Chicago Board Options Exchange. In order to
have the ability to respond to customer interest if warranted, the
Exchange proposes to continue the Pilot Program at NYSE Arca.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \6\ See Securities Exchange Act Release No. 56048 (July 11,
2007), 72 FR 39653 (July 19, 2007) (SR-NYSEArca-2007-62) (Pilot
Program extension).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    In the original proposal to establish the Pilot Program the
Exchange stated that if it were to propose an extension or an expansion
of the program, the Exchange would submit, along with any filing
proposing such amendments to the program, a Pilot Program report
(``Report''). The Report would provide an analysis of the Pilot Program
covering the entire period during which the Pilot Program was in
effect. Since the Exchange did not have any One Week Option Series
listed during the first year of the Pilot Program, there are no data
available to compile such a report at this time. Therefore there is no
Report associated with the program included with this proposal to
extend the Pilot Program.
    NYSE Arca represents that it has the necessary system capacity to
support the addition of any new options series added as part of the One
Week Option Series Pilot Program.
2. Statutory Basis
    The Exchange believes that One Week Option Series can stimulate
customer interest in options and provide a flexible and valuable tool
to manage risk exposure, minimize capital outlays, and be more
responsive to the timing of events affecting the securities that
underlie options contracts. For these reasons, the Exchange believes
the proposed rule change is consistent with the Act and the rules and
regulations thereunder and, in particular, the requirements of Section
6(b) of the Act.\7\ Specifically, the Exchange believes the proposed
rule change is consistent with the Section 6(b)(5) of the Act,\8\ which
requires that the rules of an exchange be designed to promote just and
equitable principles of trade, to prevent fraudulent and manipulative
acts, to remove impediments to and perfect the mechanism for a free and
open market and a national market system, and, in general, to protect
investors and the public interest.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \7\ 15 U.S.C. 78f(b).
    \8\ 15 U.S.C. 78(f)(b)(5).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

B. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement on Burden on Competition

    The Exchange believes that the proposed rule change will not impose
any burden on competition that is not necessary or appropriate in
furtherance of the purposes of the Act.

C. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement on Comments on the Proposed
Rule Change Received From Members, Participants or Others

    Written comments on the proposed rule change were neither solicited
nor received.

III. Date of Effectiveness of the Proposed Rule Change and Timing for
Commission Action

    The Exchange has designated the proposed rule change as one that:
(1) Does not significantly affect the protection of investors or the
public interest; (2) does not impose any significant burden on
competition; and (3) does not become operative for 30 days from the
date of filing, or such shorter time as the Commission may designate if
consistent with the protection of investors and the public interest.
Therefore, the foregoing rule change has become effective pursuant to
Section 19(b)(3)(A) of the Act \9\ and subparagraph (f)(6) of Rule 19b-
4 thereunder.\10\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \9\ 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(3)(A).
    \10\ 17 CFR 240.19b-4(f)(6). In addition, Rule 19b-4(f)(6)(iii)
requires a self-regulatory organization to provide the Commission
with written notice of its intent to file the proposed rule change,
along with a brief description and text of the proposed rule change,
at least five business days prior to the date of filing of the
proposed rule change, or such shorter time as designated by the
Commission. The Exchange has fulfilled this requirement.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    The Exchange has asked the Commission to waive the operative delay
to permit the proposed rule change to become operative prior to the
30th day after filing. The Commission has determined that waiving the
30-day operative delay of the Exchange's proposal is consistent with
the protection of investors and the public interest and will promote
competition because such waiver will allow NYSE Arca to continue the
existing Pilot Program without interruption.\11\ Therefore, the
Commission designates the proposal operative upon filing.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \11\ For purposes only of waiving the 30-day operative delay,
the Commission has considered the proposed rule's impact on
efficiency, competition, and capital formation. See 15 U.S.C.
78c(f).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    At any time within 60 days of the filing of the proposed rule
change, the Commission may summarily abrogate the rule change if it
appears to the Commission that such action is necessary or appropriate
in the public interest, for the protection of investors, or otherwise
in furtherance of the purposes of the Act.

IV. Solicitation of Comments

    Interested persons are invited to submit written data, views, and
arguments concerning the foregoing, including whether the proposed rule
change is consistent with the Act. Comments may be submitted by any of
the following methods:

Electronic Comments

     Use the Commission's Internet comment form (http://
www.sec.gov/rules/sro.shtml); or
     Send an e-mail to<EMAIL_ADDRESS>Please include
File No. SR-NYSEArca-2008-68 on the subject line.

Paper Comments

     Send paper comments in triplicate to Secretary, Securities
and Exchange Commission, 100 F Street, NE., Washington, DC 20549-1090.

All submissions should refer to File Number SR-NYSEArca-2008-68. This
file number should be included on the subject line if e-mail is used.
To help the Commission process and review your comments more
efficiently, please use only one method. The Commission will post all
comments on the Commission's Internet Web site (http://www.sec.gov/
rules/sro.shtml). Copies of the submission, all subsequent amendments,
all written statements with respect to the proposed rule change that
are filed with the Commission, and all written communications relating
to the proposed rule change between the Commission and any person,
other than those that may be withheld from the public in accordance
with the provisions of 5 U.S.C. 552, will be available for inspection
and copying in the Commission's Public Reference Room, 100 F Street,
NE., Washington, DC 20549, on official business days between the hours
of 10 a.m. and 3 p.m. Copies of such filing also will be available for
inspection and copying at the principal office of the Exchange. All
comments received will be posted without change; the Commission does

not edit personal identifying information from submissions. You should
submit only information that you wish to make available publicly. All
submissions should refer to File No. SR-NYSEArca-2008-68 and should be
submitted on or before July 31, 2008.

    For the Commission, by the Division of Trading and Markets,
pursuant to delegated authority.\12\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \12\ 17 CFR 200.30-3(a)(12).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

Florence E. Harmon,
Acting Secretary.
 [FR Doc. E8-15649 Filed 7-9-08; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 8010-01-P


[Federal Register Volume 85, Number 127 (Wednesday, July 1, 2020)]
[Notices]
[Pages 39607-39613]
[FR Doc No: 2020-14120]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

[Release No. 34-89152; File No. SR-ISE-2020-23]

Self-Regulatory Organizations; Nasdaq ISE, LLC; Notice of Filing
and Immediate Effectiveness of Proposed Rule Change To Amend Options 9,
Sections 13 and 15 To Increase the Position and Exercise Limits for
Options on Certain Exchange-Traded Funds

June 25, 2020.
    Pursuant to Section 19(b)(1) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934
(``Act''),\1\ and Rule 19b-4 thereunder,\2\ notice is hereby given that
on June 17, 2020, Nasdaq ISE, LLC (``ISE'' or ``Exchange'') filed with
the Securities and Exchange Commission (``Commission'') the proposed
rule change as described in Items I and II below, which Items have been
prepared by the Exchange. The Commission is publishing this notice to
solicit comments on the proposed rule change from interested persons.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \1\ 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(1).
    \2\ 17 CFR 240.19b-4.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

I. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement of the Terms of the
Substance of the Proposed Rule Change

    The Exchange proposes to amend Options 9, Section 13, Position
Limits, to increase position limits for options on certain exchange-
traded funds (``ETFs''), and similarly increase exercise limits within
Options 9, Section 15, Exercise Limits.
    The text of the proposed rule change is available on the Exchange's
website at http://ise.cchwallstreet.com/, at the principal office of
the Exchange, and at the Commission's Public Reference Room.

II. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement of the Purpose of, and
Statutory Basis for, the Proposed Rule Change

    In its filing with the Commission, the Exchange included statements
concerning the purpose of and basis for the proposed rule change and
discussed any comments it received on the proposed rule change. The
text of these statements may be examined at the places specified in
Item IV below. The Exchange has prepared summaries, set forth in
sections A, B, and C below, of the most significant aspects of such
statements.

A. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement of the Purpose of, and
Statutory Basis for, the Proposed Rule Change

1. Purpose
    The Exchange proposes to amend Options 9, Section 13, Position
Limits, to increase position limits for options on certain exchange-
traded funds (``ETFs''), and similarly increase exercise limits within
Options 9, Section 15, Exercise Limits. The Exchange proposes to
specifically amend Supplementary Material .01 to Options 9, Section 13
and Supplementary Material .01 to Options 9, Section 15. These proposed
rule changes are based on the similar proposal by Cboe Exchange, Inc.
(``Cboe'').\3\ The Exchange also proposes to make a minor non-
substantive technical corrections to an ETF name within Supplementary
Material .01 to Options 9, Section 13 and Supplementary Material .01 to
Options 9, Section 15. Each change will be described below.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \3\ See Securities Exchange Act Release No. 88768 (April 29,
2020) (SR-CBOE-2020-015) (Notice of Filing of Amendment No. 1 and
Order Granting Accelerated Approval of a Proposed Rule Change, as
Modified by Amendment No. 1, to Increase Position Limits for Options
on Certain Exchange-Traded Funds and Indexes). The Cboe proposal
also proposed to increase position limits for options overlying the
MSCI Emerging Markets Index (``MXEF'') and the MSCI EAFE Index
(``MXEA''). The Exchange, however, does not list options on the MXEF
or MXEA indexes. Accordingly, this proposal is limited to the ETFs
described above.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    Position limits are designed to address potential manipulative
schemes and adverse market impacts surrounding the use of options, such
as disrupting the market in the security underlying the options. While
position limits should address and discourage the potential for
manipulative schemes and adverse market impact, if such limits are set
too low, participation in the options market may be discouraged. The
Exchange believes that position limits must therefore be balanced
between mitigating concerns of any potential manipulation and the cost
of inhibiting potential hedging activity that could be used for
legitimate economic purposes.
    The Exchange has observed an ongoing increase in demand in options
on the SPDR[supreg] S&P 500[supreg] ETF Trust (``SPY''),
iShares[supreg] MSCI EAFE ETF (``EFA''), iShares[supreg] China Large-
Cap ETF (``FXI''), iShares[supreg] iBoxx[supreg] High Yield Corporate
Bond Fund (``HYG''), Financial Select Sector SPDR[supreg] Fund
(``XLF'') (collectively, with the aforementioned ETFs, the ``Underlying
ETFs'') for both trading and hedging purposes. Though the demand for
these options on the Underlying ETFs appear to have increased, position
limits (and corresponding exercise limits) for these options have
remained the same. The Exchange believes these unchanged position
limits may have impeded, and may continue to impede, trading activity
and strategies of investors, such as use of effective hedging vehicles
or income generating strategies (e.g., buy-write or put-write), and the
ability of Market Makers to make liquid markets with tighter spreads in
these options, resulting in the transfer of volume to over-the-counter
(``OTC'') markets. OTC transactions occur through bilateral agreements,
the terms of which are not publically disclosed to the marketplace. As
such, OTC transactions do not contribute to the price discovery process
on a public exchange or other lit markets. Therefore, the Exchange
believes that the proposed increases in position limits (and exercise
limits) for options on the Underlying ETFs may enable liquidity
providers to provide additional liquidity to the Exchange and other
market participants to transfer their liquidity demands from OTC
markets to the Exchange, as well as other options exchange on which
they participate. As described in further detail below, the Exchange
believes that the continuously increasing market capitalization of the
Underlying ETFs and ETF component securities, as well as the highly
liquid markets for those securities, reduces the concerns for potential
market manipulation and/or disruption in the underlying markets upon
increasing position limits, while the rising demand for trading options
on the Underlying ETFs for legitimate

economic purposes compels an increase in position limits (and
corresponding exercise limits).
Proposed Position Limits for Options on the Underlying ETFs
    Position limits for options on ETFs are determined pursuant to
Options 9, Section 13, and vary according to the number of outstanding
shares and the trading volumes of the underlying stocks or ETFs over
the past six months. Pursuant to Options 9, Section 13, the largest in
capitalization and the most frequently traded stocks and ETFs have an
option position limit of 250,000 contracts (with adjustments for
splits, re-capitalizations, etc.) on the same side of the market; and
smaller capitalization stocks and ETFs have position limits of 200,000,
75,000, 50,000 or 25,000 contracts (with adjustments for splits,
recapitalizations, etc.) on the same side of the market. Options on
HYG, and XLF are currently subject to the standard position limit of
250,000 contracts. Options 9, Section 13 sets forth separate position
limits for options on specific ETFs, including SPY, FXI and EFA. In
addition, the Exchange is making corresponding amendments to exercise
limits within Options 9, Section 15.
    The Exchange proposes to amend Options 9, Section 13 and Options 9,
Section 15, respectively, to double the position and exercise limits
for options on each of FXI, EFA, SPY, HYG and XLF. The Exchange also
proposes to list position and exercise limits for HYG and XLF within
Options 9, Section 13 and Options 9, Section 15, respectively. The
table below represents the current, and proposed, position limits for
options on the ETFs subject to this proposal:

------------------------------------------------------------------------
                                              Current        Proposed
                   ETF                    position limit  position limit
------------------------------------------------------------------------
SPY.....................................       1,800,000       3,600,000
EFA.....................................         500,000       1,000,000
FXI.....................................         500,000       1,000,000
HYG.....................................         250,000         500,000
XLF.....................................         250,000         500,000
------------------------------------------------------------------------

    The Exchange notes that the proposed position limits for options on
EFA and FXI are consistent with existing position limits for options on
the iShares[supreg] Russell 2000 ETF (``IWM'') and the iShares[supreg]
MSCI Emerging Markets ETF (``EEM''), while the proposed limits for
options on XLF and HYG are consistent with current position limits for
options on the iShares[supreg] MSCI Brazil Capped ETF (``EWZ''),
iShares[supreg] 20+ Year Treasury Bond Fund ETF (``TLT''), and
iShares[supreg] MSCI Japan ETF (``EWJ''). The Exchange represents that
the Underlying ETFs qualify for either (1) the initial listing criteria
set forth in to Options 4, Section 3(h) for ETFs holding non-U.S.
component securities, or (2) generic listing standards for series of
portfolio depository receipts and index fund shares based on
international or global indexes under which a comprehensive
surveillance agreement (``CSA'') is not required, as well as the
continued listing criteria in Options 4, Section 4.\4\ In compliance
with its listing rules, the Exchange also represents that non-U.S.
component securities that are not subject to a comprehensive
surveillance agreement (``CSA'') do not, in the aggregate, represent
more than more than 50% of the weight of any of the Underlying ETFs.\5\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \4\ The Exchange notes that the initial listing criteria for
options on ETFs that hold non-U.S. component securities are more
stringent than the maintenance listing criteria for those same ETF
options. See Options 4, Section 4(h).
    \5\ See Options 4, Section 3(h).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

Composition and Growth Analysis for Underlying ETFs
    As stated above, position (and exercise) limits are intended to
prevent the establishment of options positions that can be used or
might create incentives to manipulate the underlying market so as to
benefit options positions. The Commission has recognized that these
limits are designed to minimize the potential for mini-manipulations
and for corners or squeezes of the underlying market, as well as serve
to reduce the possibility for disruption of the options market itself,
especially in illiquid classes.\6\ The Underlying ETFs as well as the
ETF components are highly liquid, and are based on a broad set of
highly liquid securities and other reference assets, as demonstrated
through the trading statistics presented in this proposal. Indeed, the
Commission recognized the liquidity of the securities comprising the
underlying interest of SPY and permitted no position limits on SPY
options from 2012 through 2018.\7\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \6\ See Securities Exchange Act Release No. 67672 (August 15,
2012), 77 FR 50750 (August 22, 2012) (SR-NYSEAmex-2012-29).
    \7\ See Securities Exchange Act Release No. 68000 (October 5,
2012), 77 FR 62300 (October 12, 2012) (SR-ISE-2012-81), which
implemented a pilot program that ran through 2017, during which
there were no position limits for options on SPY. The Exchange notes
that throughout the duration of the pilot program it was not aware
of any problems created or adverse consequences as of result of the
pilot program. See also Securities Exchange Act Release No. 83416
(June 12, 2018), 83 FR 28293 (June 18, 2018) (SR-ISE-2018-53).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    To support the proposed position limit increases (and corresponding
increase in exercise limits), the Exchange considered both liquidity of
the Underlying ETFs and the component securities of the Underlying
ETFs, as well as the availability of economically equivalent products
to the overlying options and their respective position limits. For
instance, some of the Underlying ETFs are based upon broad-based
indices that underlie cash-settled options, and therefore the options
on the Underlying ETFs are economically equivalent to the options on
those indices, which have no position limits. Other Underlying ETFs are
based upon broad-based indices that underlie cash-settled options with
position limits reflecting notional values that are larger than current
position limits for options on the ETF analogues. For indexes that are
tracked by an Underlying ETF but on which there are no options listed,
the Exchange believes, based on the liquidity, depth and breadth of the
underlying market of the components of the indexes, that each of the
indexes referenced by the applicable ETFs would be considered a broad-
based index under the Exchange's Rules. Additionally, if in some cases
certain position limits are appropriate for the options overlying
comparable indexes or basket of securities that the Underlying ETFs
track then those economically equivalent position limits should be
appropriate for the options overlying the Underlying ETFs.
    The Exchange is presenting data collected by Cboe as part of its
initial filing to increase position and exercise limits on the
Underlying ETFs, that the

Commission approved,\8\ following trading statistics regarding shares
of and options on the Underlying ETFs, as well as the component
securities:
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \8\ See supra note 3.

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
                                                                                Shares outstanding      Fund market cap     Total market cap of
              Product               ADV \9\ (ETF shares)     ADV (option contracts)          (ETFs) \10\              (USD)          ETF components \11\
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
SPY...............................  70.3 million........                   2.8 million  968.7 million.......  312.9 billion.......  29.3 trillion
FXI...............................  26.1 million........                       196,600  106.8 million.......  4.8 billion.........  28.0 trillion
EFA...............................  25.1 million........                       155,900  928.2 million.......  64.9 billion........  19.3 trillion
HYG...............................  20.0 million........                       193,700  216.6 million.......  19.1 billion........  906.4 billion \12\
XLF...............................  48.8 million........                       102,100  793.6 million.......  24.6 billion........  3.8 trillion
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

    The Exchange is presenting the following data collected by Cboe as
part of its initial filing, that the Commission has approved,\13\ for
the same trading statistics, where applicable, as above regarding a
sample of other ETFs, as well as the current position limits for
options on such ETFs pursuant to Options 9, Section 13, to draw
comparisons in support of proposed position limit increases for options
on a number of the Underlying ETFs (see further discussion below):
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \9\ Cboe's Average daily volume (ADV) data for ETF shares and
options contracts are for all of 2019. Additionally, reference to
ADV in ETF shares, and ETF options herein this proposal are for all
of 2019, unless otherwise indicated.
    \10\ See Amendment No. 1 to SR-CBOE-2020-015, at page 4,
available at https://www.sec.gov/comments/sr-cboe-2020-015/srcboe2020015-7081714-215592.pdf (``Amendment No. 1'').
    \11\ See Amendment No. 1, at page 4.
    \12\ See Notice, at note 13.
    \13\ See supra note 3.

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
                                                                                Current
             Product                 ADV (ETF shares)      ADV (option    Shares outstanding      Fund market cap    Total market cap of     position
                                                           contracts)           (ETFs)                 (USD)            ETF components        limits
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
QQQ..............................  30.2 million........         670,200  410.3 million.......  88.7 billion........  10.1 trillion......       1,800,000
EWZ..............................  26.7 million........         186,500  233 million.........  11.3 billion........  234.6 billion......         500,000
TLT..............................  9.6 million.........          95,200  128.1 million.......  17.5 billion........  N/A................         500,000
EWJ..............................  7.2 million.........           5,700  236.6 million.......  14.2 billion........  3 trillion.........         500,000
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

    The Exchange believes that, overall, the liquidity in the shares of
the Underlying ETFs and in the component securities of the Underlying
ETFs and in their overlying options, as well as the large market
capitalizations and structure of each of the Underlying ETFs support
the proposal to increase the position limits for each option class (and
corresponding exercise limits). Given the robust liquidity and
capitalization in the Underlying ETFs and in the component securities
of the Underlying ETFs the Exchange does not anticipate that the
proposed increase in position limits would create significant price
movements. Also, the Exchange believes the market capitalization of the
underlying component securities of the applicable index or reference
asset are large enough to adequately absorb potential price movements
that may be caused by large trades.
    The following analyses for the Underlying ETFs, which the Exchange
agrees with in support of this proposal, as well as the statistics
presented in support thereof, were presented by Cboe in their initial
filing, which was approved by the Commission.\14\ The Exchange notes
that SPY tracks the performance of the S&P 500 Index, which is an index
of diversified large cap U.S. companies.\15\ It is composed of 505
selected stocks spanning over approximately 24 separate industry
groups. The S&P 500 is one of the most commonly followed equity
indices, and is widely considered to be the best indicator of stock
market performance as a whole. SPY is one of the most actively traded
ETFs, and, since 2017,\16\ its ADV has increased from approximately
64.6 million shares to 70.3 million shares by the end of 2019.
Similarly, its ADV in options contracts has increased from 2.6 million
to 2.8 million through 2019.\17\ As noted, the demand for options
trading on SPY has continued to increase, however, the position limits
have remained the same, which the Exchange believes may have impacted
growth in SPY option volume from 2017 through 2019. The Exchange also
notes that SPY shares are more liquid than INVESCO QQQ Trust\SM\,
Series 1 (``QQQ'') shares, which is also currently subject to a
position limit of 1,800,000 contracts. Specifically, SPY currently
experiences over twice the ADV in shares and over four times the ADV in
options than that of QQQ.\18\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \14\ See supra note 3.
    \15\ See SPDR S&P 500 ETF Trust, available at https://www.ssga.com/us/en/individual/etfs/funds/spdr-sp-500-etf-trust-spy
(January 21, 2020).
    \16\ See Securities Exchange Release No. 83156 (May 2, 2018), 83
FR 20882 (May 8, 2018) (SR-ISE-2018-39) (Notice of Filing and
Immediate Effectiveness of Proposed Rule Change To Amend ISE Rules
412, Position Limits, and 414, Exercise Limits). See also supra note
3.
    \17\ See also Securities Exchange Act Release No. 83416 (June
12, 2018), 83 FR 28293 (June 18, 2018) (SR-ISE-2018-53) (Notice of
Filing and Immediate Effectiveness of Proposed Rule Change To Amend
Position and Exercise Limits for Options on the SPY Exchange Traded
Fund).
    \18\ The 2019 ADV for QQQ shares is 30.2 million and for options
on QQQ is 670,200.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    EFA tracks the performance of MSCI EAFE Index (``MXEA''), which is
comprised of over 900 large and mid-cap securities across 21 developed
markets, including countries in Europe, Australia and the Far East,
excluding the U.S. and Canada.\19\ In support of its proposal to
increase the position limit for EFA, Cboe's proposal specifies, that
from 2017 through 2019, ADV has grown significantly in shares of EFA
and in options on EFA, from approximately 19.4 million shares in 2017
to 25.1 million through 2019, and from approximately 98,800 options
contract in 2017 to 155,900 through 2019. Further, Cboe compared the
notional value of EFA's share price of $69.44 and MXEA's index level of
2036.94, approximately 29 EFA option contracts equal one MXEA option
contract. Based on the above comparison of notional values, Cboe
concluded that a position limit for EFA options would be economically
equivalent to that of MXEA options which equates to 725,000 contracts
(previously) and 1,450,000 for Cboe's

current 50,000 contract position limit for MXEA options.\20\ Cboe also
noted that MXEA index options have an ADV of 594 options contracts,
which equate to an ADV of 17,226 EFA option contracts (as that is 29
times the size of 594). The Exchange believes the significantly higher
actual ADV (155,900 contracts), economically equivalent ADV (17,226
contracts), notional value, and economically equivalent position limits
for EFA as compared to MXEA options, supports an increase in position
limits for EFA options from 500,000 contracts to 1,000,000 contracts.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \19\ See iShares MSCI EAFE ETF, available at https://www.ishares.com/us/products/239623/ishares-msci-eafe-etf (February
10, 2020).
    \20\ The Exchange does not list options on foreign indexes.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    FXI tracks the performance of the FTSE China 50 Index, which is
composed of the 50 largest Chinese stocks.\21\ According to Cboe, FXI
shares and options have also experienced increased liquidity since
2017, as ADV has grown from approximately 15.1 million shares in 2017
to 26.1 million through 2019, as well as approximately 71,900 options
contracts in 2017 to 196,600 through 2019. Cboe notes that although
there are currently no options on the FTSE China 50 Index listed for
trading, the components of the FTSE China 50 Index, which can be used
to create a basket of stocks that equate to the FXI ETF, currently have
a market capitalization of approximately $28 trillion and FXI has a
market capitalization of $4.8 billion (as indicated above), which the
Exchange believes are both large enough to absorb potential price
movements caused by a large trade in FXI.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \21\ See iShares China Large-Cap ETF, available at https://www.ishares.com/us/products/239536/ishares-china-largecap-etf
(February 10, 2020).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    XLF invests in a wide array of financial service firms with
diversified business lines ranging from investment management to
commercial and investment banking. It generally corresponds to the
price and yield performance of publicly traded equity securities of
companies in the SPDR Financial Select Sector Index.\22\ In support of
its proposal, Cboe compared XLF's ADV in shares and in options to the
ADV in shares and options for EWZ (26.7 million shares and 186,500
options contracts), TLT (9.6 million shares and 95,200 options
contracts), and EWJ (7.2 million shares and 5,700 options contracts).
According to Cboe, XLF experiences significantly greater ADV in shares
and options than EWZ, TLT, and EWJ, which already have a position limit
of 500,000 contracts--the proposed position limit for XLF options.
According to Cboe, although there are no options listed on the SPDR
Financial Select Sector Index listed for trading, the components of the
index, which can be used to create a basket of stocks that equate to
the XLF ETF, currently have a market capitalization of $3.8 trillion
(indicated above). Additionally, XLF has a market capitalization of
$24.6 billion. The Exchange believes that both of these are large
enough to absorb potential price movements caused by a large trade in
XLF.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \22\ See Select Sector SPDR ETFs, XLF, available at http://www.sectorspdr.com/sectorspdr/sector/xlf (January 15, 2020).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    Finally, HYG attempts to track the investment results of Markit
iBoxx[supreg] USD Liquid High Yield Index, which is composed of U.S.
dollar-denominated, high-yield corporate bonds and is one of the most
widely used high-yield bond ETFs.\23\ To support its proposed position
limit increase on HYG, Cboe compared the HYG's ADV in share and options
to that of both TLT (9.6 million shares and 95,200 options contracts),
and EWJ (7.2 million shares and 5,700 options contracts). The Exchange
agrees with Cboe's comparison and following analysis. Cboe found that
HYG experiences significantly higher ADV in shares and options than
both TLT and EWJ, which are currently subject to a position limit of
500,000 options contracts--the proposed limit for options on HYG.
According to Cboe, while HYG does not have an index option analogue
listed for trading, Cboe believes that its market capitalization of
$19.1 billion, and of $906.4 billion in component securities, is
adequate to absorb a potential price movement that may be caused by
large trades in HYG.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \23\ See iShares iBoxx $ High Yield Corporate Bond ETF,
available at https://www.ishares.com/us/products/239565/ishares-iboxx-high-yield-corporatebond-etf (January 15, 2020).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

Creation and Redemption for ETFs
    The Exchange believes that the creation and redemption process for
ETFs will lessen the potential for manipulative activity with options
on the Underlying ETFs. When an ETF provider wants to create more
shares, it looks to an Authorized Participant (generally a market maker
or other large financial institution) to acquire the securities the ETF
is to hold. For instance, when an ETF is designed to track the
performance of an index, the Authorized Participant can purchase all
the constituent securities in the exact same weight as the index, then
deliver those shares to the ETF provider. In exchange, the ETF provider
gives the Authorized Participant a block of equally valued ETF shares,
on a one-for-one fair value basis. The price is based on the net asset
value, not the market value at which the ETF is trading. The creation
of new ETF units can be conducted during an entire trading day, and is
not subject to position limits. This process works in reverse where the
ETF provider seeks to decrease the number of shares that are available
to trade. The creation and redemption process, therefore, creates a
direct link to the underlying components of the ETF, and serves to
mitigate potential price impact of the ETF shares that might otherwise
result from increased position limits for the ETF options.
    The Exchange understands that the ETF creation and redemption
process seeks to keep an ETF's share price trading in line with the
ETF's underlying net asset value. Because an ETF trades like a stock,
its share price will fluctuate during the trading day, due to simple
supply and demand. If demand to buy an ETF is high, for instance, the
ETF's share price might rise above the value of its underlying
securities. When this happens, the Authorized Participant believes the
ETF may now be overpriced, so it may buy shares of the component
securities and then sell ETF shares in the open market (i.e.,
creations). This may drive the ETF's share price back toward the
underlying net asset value. Likewise, if the ETF share price starts
trading at a discount to the securities it holds, the Authorized
Participant can buy shares of the ETF and redeem them for the
underlying securities (i.e., redemptions). Buying undervalued ETF
shares may drive the share price of the ETF back toward fair value.
This arbitrage process helps to keep an ETF's share price in line with
the value of its underlying portfolio.
Surveillance and Reporting Requirements
    The Exchange believes that increasing the position limits for the
options on the Underlying ETFs would lead to a more liquid and
competitive market environment for these options, which will benefit
customers interested in trading these products. The reporting
requirement for the options on the Underlying ETFs would remain
unchanged. Thus, the Exchange would still require that each Member that
maintains positions in the options on the same side of the market, for
its own account or for the account of a customer, report certain
information to the Exchange. This information would include, but would
not be limited to, the options' positions, whether such positions are
hedged and, if so, a description of the hedge(s). Market Makers would
continue to be exempt

from this reporting requirement, however, the Exchange may access
Market-Maker position information.\24\ Moreover, the Exchange's
requirement that Members file reports with the Exchange for any
customer who held aggregate large long or short positions on the same
side of the market of 200 or more options contracts of any single class
for the previous day will remain at this level for the options subject
to this proposal and will continue to serve as an important part of the
Exchange's surveillance efforts.\25\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \24\ The Options Clearing Corporation (``OCC'') through the
Large Option Position Reporting (``LOPR'') system acts as a
centralized service provider for Member compliance with position
reporting requirements by collecting data from each Member,
consolidating the information, and ultimately providing detailed
listings of each Member's report to the Exchange, as well as
Financial Industry Regulatory Authority, Inc. (``FINRA''), acting as
its agent pursuant to a regulatory services agreement (``RSA'').
    \25\ See Options 6E, Section 2 for reporting requirements.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    The Exchange believes that the existing surveillance procedures and
reporting requirements at the Exchange and other SROs are capable of
properly identifying disruptive and/or manipulative trading activity.
The Exchange also represents that it has adequate surveillances in
place to detect potential manipulation, as well as reviews in place to
identify potential changes in composition of the Underlying ETFs and
continued compliance with the Exchange's listing standards. These
procedures utilize daily monitoring of market activity via automated
surveillance techniques to identify unusual activity in both options
and the underlyings, as applicable.\26\ The Exchange also notes that
large stock holdings must be disclosed to the Commission by way of
Schedules 13D or 13G,\27\ which are used to report ownership of stock
which exceeds 5% of a company's total stock issue and may assist in
providing information in monitoring for any potential manipulative
schemes.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \26\ The Exchange believes these procedures have been effective
for the surveillance of trading the options subject to this
proposal, and will continue to employ them.
    \27\ 17 CFR 240.13d-1.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    The Exchange believes that the current financial requirements
imposed by the Exchange and by the Commission adequately address
concerns regarding potentially large, unhedged positions in the options
on the Underlying ETFs. Current margin and risk-based haircut
methodologies serve to limit the size of positions maintained by any
one account by increasing the margin and/or capital that a Member must
maintain for a large position held by itself or by its customer.\28\ In
addition, Rule 15c3-1 \29\ imposes a capital charge on Members to the
extent of any margin deficiency resulting from the higher margin
requirement.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \28\ See Options 6C, Section 3 for a description of margin
requirements.
    \29\ 17 CFR 240.15c3-1.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

Technical Corrections
    The Exchange also proposes to rename SPDR Dow Jones[supreg]
Industrial Average ETF Trust (SPY) as SPDR[supreg] S&P 500[supreg] ETF
Trust (SPY) to conform to the correct name of the product.
2. Statutory Basis
    The Exchange believes the proposed rule change is consistent with
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (the ``Act'') and the rules and
regulations thereunder applicable to the Exchange and, in particular,
the requirements of Section 6(b) of the Act.\30\ Specifically, the
Exchange believes the proposed rule change is consistent with the
Section 6(b)(5) \31\ requirements that the rules of an exchange be
designed to prevent fraudulent and manipulative acts and practices, to
promote just and equitable principles of trade, to foster cooperation
and coordination with persons engaged in regulating, clearing,
settling, processing information with respect to, and facilitating
transactions in securities, to remove impediments to and perfect the
mechanism of a free and open market and a national market system, and,
in general, to protect investors and the public interest. Additionally,
the Exchange believes the proposed rule change is consistent with the
Section 6(b)(5) \32\ requirement that the rules of an exchange not be
designed to permit unfair discrimination between customers, issuers,
brokers, or dealers.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \30\ 15 U.S.C. 78f(b).
    \31\ 15 U.S.C. 78f(b)(5).
    \32\ Id.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    The Exchange believes that the proposed increase in position limits
for options on the Underlying ETFs will remove impediments to and
perfect the mechanism of a free and open market and a national market
system, and, in general, protect investors and the public interest,
because it will provide market participants with the ability to more
effectively execute their trading and hedging activities. The proposed
increases will allow market participants to more fully implement
hedging strategies in related derivative products and to further use
options to achieve investment strategies (e.g., there are Exchange-
Traded Products (``ETPs'') that use options on the Underlying ETFs as
part of their investment strategy, and the applicable position limits
(and corresponding exercise limits) as they stand today may inhibit
these ETPs in achieving their investment objectives, to the detriment
of investors). Also, increasing the applicable position limits may
allow Market Makers to provide the markets for these options with more
liquidity in amounts commensurate with increased consumer demand in
such markets. The proposed position limit increases may also encourage
other liquidity providers to shift liquidity, as well as encourage
consumers to shift demand, from over the counter markets onto the
Exchange, which will enhance the process of price discovery conducted
on the Exchange through increased order flow.
    In addition, the Exchange believes that the structure of the
Underlying ETFs, the considerable market capitalization of the funds,
underlying component securities and the liquidity of the markets for
the applicable options and underlying component securities will
mitigate concerns regarding potential manipulation of the products and/
or disruption of the underlying markets upon increasing the relevant
position limits. As a general principle, increases in market
capitalizations, active trading volume, and deep liquidity of
securities deter manipulation and/or disruption. This general principle
applies to the recently observed increased levels of market
capitalization, trading volume, and liquidity in shares of the
Underlying ETFs, and the components of the Underlying ETFs (as
described above). The Exchange does not believe that the options
markets or underlying markets would become susceptible to manipulation
and/or disruption as a result of the proposed position limit increases.
Indeed, the Commission has previously expressed the belief that
removing position and exercise limits may bring additional depth and
liquidity to the options markets without increasing concerns regarding
intermarket manipulation or disruption of the options or the underlying
securities.\33\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \33\ See Securities Exchange Act Release No. 62147 (October 28,
2005) (SR-CBOE-2005-41), at 62149.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    Further, the Exchange notes that the proposed rule change to
increase position limits for select actively traded options, is not
novel and has been previously approved by the Commission. The proposed
increase to the position and exercise limits on the Underlying ETFs has
recently been approved by the Commission.\34\ The Commission has
previously approved, on a pilot basis, eliminating position

limits for options on SPY.\35\ Additionally, the Commission has
approved similar proposed rule changes by the Exchange to increase
position limits for options on highly liquid, actively traded ETFs.\36\
In approving increases in position limits in the past, the Commission
relied heavily upon the exchange's surveillance capabilities,
expressing trust in the enhanced surveillances and reporting safeguards
that the exchange took in order to detect and deter possible
manipulative behavior which might arise from eliminating position and
exercise limits.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \34\ See supra note 3.
    \35\ See supra notes 7 and 8.
    \36\ See supra note 20.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    Furthermore, the Exchange again notes that that the proposed
position limits for options on EFA and FXI are consistent with existing
position limits for options on IWM and EEM, and the proposed limits for
options on XLF and HYG are consistent with current position limits for
options on EWZ, TLT, and EWJ.
    The Exchange's surveillance and reporting safeguards continue to be
designed to deter and detect possible manipulative behavior that might
arise from increasing or eliminating position and exercise limits in
certain classes. The Exchange believes that the current financial
requirements imposed by the Exchange and by the Commission adequately
address concerns regarding potentially large, unhedged position in the
options on the Underlying ETFs, further promoting just and equitable
principles of trading, the maintenance of a fair and orderly market,
and the protection of investors.
Technical Corrections
    The Exchange's proposal to make a technical amendment to the name
of an ETF, within Supplementary Material .01 to Options 9, Section 13
and Supplementary Material .01 to Options 9, Section 15 will correct
the name of this product and is therefore non-substantive. Accordingly,
this technical amendment is intended to bring greater clarity to the
rule text and is consistent with the Act.

B. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement on Burden on Competition

    The Exchange does not believe that the proposed rule change will
impose an unnecessary burden on intra-market competition because it
will apply to all market participants. The Exchange does not believe
the proposed rule change will impose any burden on inter-market
competition that is not necessary or appropriate in furtherance of the
purposes of the Act because the increased position limits (and exercise
limits) will be available to all market participants and apply to each
in the same manner. The Exchange believes that the proposed rule change
will provide additional opportunities for market participants to more
efficiently achieve their investment and trading objectives of market
participants.
    The Exchange does not believe that the proposed rule change will
impose any burden on intermarket competition that is not necessary or
appropriate in furtherance of the Act. On the contrary, the Exchange
believes the proposal promotes competition because it may attract
additional order flow from the OTC market to exchanges, which would in
turn compete amongst each other for those orders.\37\ The Exchange
believes market participants would benefit from being able to trade
options with increased position limits in an exchange environment in
several ways, including but not limited to the following: (1) Enhanced
efficiency in initiating and closing out position; (2) increased market
transparency; and (3) heightened contra-party creditworthiness due to
the role of OCC as issuer and guarantor. The Exchange understands that
other options exchanges intend to file similar proposed rule changes
with the Commission to increase position limits on options on the
Underlying ETFs. This may further contribute to fair competition among
exchanges for multiply listed options.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \37\ Additionally, several other options exchanges have the same
position limits as the Exchange is proposing, as they incorporate by
reference to Cboe's position limits, and as a result the position
limits for options on the Underlying ETFs and will increase at those
exchanges. See Nasdaq Stock Market LLC Rules, Options 9, Section 13
(Position Limits).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

Technical Corrections
    The Exchange's proposal to make a technical amendment to the name
of an ETF, within Supplementary Material .01 to Options 9, Section 13
and Supplementary Material .01 to Options 9, Section 15 will correct
the name of this product and is therefore non-substantive. Accordingly,
this technical amendment is intended to bring greater clarity to the
rule text and does not impose a burden on competition.

C. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement on Comments on the Proposed
Rule Change Received From Members, Participants, or Others

    No written comments were either solicited or received.

III. Date of Effectiveness of the Proposed Rule Change and Timing for
Commission Action

    Because the foregoing proposed rule change does not: (i)
Significantly affect the protection of investors or the public
interest; (ii) impose any significant burden on competition; and (iii)
become operative for 30 days from the date on which it was filed, or
such shorter time as the Commission may designate, it has become
effective pursuant to Section 19(b)(3)(A) of the Act \38\ and Rule 19b-
4(f)(6) thereunder.\39\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \38\ 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(3)(A).
    \39\ 17 CFR 240.19b-4(f)(6). In addition, Rule 19b-4(f)(6)(iii)
requires a self-regulatory organization to give the Commission
written notice of its intent to file the proposed rule change, along
with a brief description and text of the proposed rule change, at
least five business days prior to the date of filing of the proposed
rule change, or such shorter time as designated by the Commission.
The Exchange has satisfied this requirement.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    A proposed rule change filed pursuant to Rule 19b-4(f)(6) under the
Act \40\ normally does not become operative for 30 days after the date
of its filing. However, Rule 19b-4(f)(6)(iii) \41\ permits the
Commission to designate a shorter time if such action is consistent
with the protection of investors and the public interest. The Exchange
has asked the Commission to waive the 30-day operative delay so that
the proposed rule change may become operative upon filing. The Exchange
states that waiver of the operative delay would be consistent with the
protection of investors and the public interest because it would allow
the Exchange to immediately increase its position and exercise limits
for the products subject to this proposal to those of Cboe, which the
Exchange believes will ensure fair competition among exchanges and
provide consistency and uniformity among members of both Cboe and ISE
by subjecting members of both exchanges to the same position and
exercise limits for these multiply-listed options classes. For this
reason, the Commission believes that waiver of the 30-day operative
delay is consistent with the protection of investors and the public
interest. Therefore, the Commission hereby waives the operative delay
and designates the proposal as operative upon filing.\42\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \40\ 17 CFR 240.19b-4(f)(6).
    \41\ 17 CFR 240.19b-4(f)(6)(iii).
    \42\ For purposes only of waiving the 30-day operative delay,
the Commission also has considered the proposed rule's impact on
efficiency, competition, and capital formation. See 15 U.S.C.
78c(f).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    At any time within 60 days of the filing of the proposed rule
change, the Commission summarily may temporarily suspend such rule
change if

it appears to the Commission that such action is necessary or
appropriate in the public interest, for the protection of investors, or
otherwise in furtherance of the purposes of the Act. If the Commission
takes such action, the Commission shall institute proceedings to
determine whether the proposed rule change should be approved or
disapproved.

IV. Solicitation of Comments

    Interested persons are invited to submit written data, views, and
arguments concerning the foregoing, including whether the proposed rule
change is consistent with the Act. Comments may be submitted by any of
the following methods:

Electronic Comments

     Use the Commission's internet comment form (http://www.sec.gov/rules/sro.shtml); or
     Send an email to<EMAIL_ADDRESS>Please include
File Number SR-ISE-2020-23 on the subject line.

Paper Comments

     Send paper comments in triplicate to Secretary, Securities
and Exchange Commission, 100 F Street NE, Washington, DC 20549-1090.
All submissions should refer to File Number SR-ISE-2020-23. This file
number should be included on the subject line if email is used. To help
the Commission process and review your comments more efficiently,
please use only one method. The Commission will post all comments on
the Commission's internet website (http://www.sec.gov/rules/sro.shtml).
Copies of the submission, all subsequent amendments, all written
statements with respect to the proposed rule change that are filed with
the Commission, and all written communications relating to the proposed
rule change between the Commission and any person, other than those
that may be withheld from the public in accordance with the provisions
of 5 U.S.C. 552, will be available for website viewing and printing in
the Commission's Public Reference Room, 100 F Street NE, Washington, DC
20549 on official business days between the hours of 10:00 a.m. and
3:00 p.m. Copies of such filing also will be available for inspection
and copying at the principal office of the Exchange. All comments
received will be posted without change. Persons submitting comments are
cautioned that we do not redact or edit personal identifying
information from comment submissions. You should submit only
information that you wish to make available publicly. All submissions
should refer to File Number SR-ISE-2020-23, and should be submitted on
or before July 22, 2020.

    For the Commission, by the Division of Trading and Markets,
pursuant to delegated authority.\43\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \43\ 17 CFR 200.30-3(a)(12).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

J. Matthew DeLesDernier,
Assistant Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2020-14120 Filed 6-30-20; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 8011-01-P


[Federal Register: October 6, 2005 (Volume 70, Number 193)]
[Notices]
[Page 58401-58402]
[DOCID:fr06oc05-74]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission

[Project No. 9184-013]

Flambeau Hydro, LLC; Notice Soliciting Scoping Comments

September 30, 2005.
    Take notice that the following hydroelectric application has been
filed with the Commission and is available for public inspection.
    a. Type of Application: Subsequent License.
    b. Project No.: P-9184-013.
    c. Date filed: June 10, 2005.
    d. Applicant: Flambeau Hydro, LLC.
    e. Name of Project: Danbury Hydroelectric Project.
    f. Location: On the Yellow River in Burnett County, Wisconsin. The
project does not occupy federal lands.
    g. Filed Pursuant to: Federal Power Act 16 U.S.C. 791(a)-825(r).
    h. Applicant Contact: Scott Klabunde, North American Hydro, Inc.,
PO Box 167, Neshkoro, WI 54960;<PHONE_NUMBER> ext. 14.
    i. FERC Contact: Tim Konnert,<PHONE_NUMBER> or
<EMAIL_ADDRESS>
    j. Deadline for filing scoping comments: October 31, 2005.
    All documents (original and eight copies) should be filed with:
Magalie R. Salas, Secretary, Federal Energy Regulatory Commission, 888
First Street, NE., Washington, DC 20426.
    The Commission's Rules of Practice require all intervenors filing
documents with the Commission to serve a copy of that document on each
person on the official service list for the project. Further, if an
intervenor files comments or documents with the Commission relating to
the merits of an issue that may affect the responsibilities of a
particular resource agency, they must also serve a copy of the document
on that resource agency.
    Scoping comments may be filed electronically via the Internet in
lieu of paper. The Commission strongly encourages electronic filings.
See 18 CFR 385.2001(a)(1)(iii) and the instructions on the Commission's
Web site (http://www.ferc.gov) under the ``eFiling'' link.

    k. This application is not ready for environmental analysis at this
time.
    l. The existing Danbury Project consists of: (1) A35-foot-high
concrete dam with a 48-foot-wide spillway with three sections, each of
which is equipped with 7-foot-high slide gates; (2) a 300-foot-long
earthen dike connecting to the right side of the concrete dam; (3) a
powerhouse (Plant 1) integral to the dam containing a 176-kW turbine
generating unit and a 300-kW turbine generating unit; (4) a 255-acre
reservoir with a negligible net storage capacity at a water surface
elevation of 929.21 feet NGVD from April through October and 928.11
feet NGVD from November through March; (5) a 2,500-foot-long power
canal that conveys water to; (6) a second powerhouse (Plant 2)
containing a single 600-kW turbine generating unit; and (7) appurtenant
facilities. The applicant estimates that the total average annual
generation is 3,844 megawatt-hours.
    m. A copy of the application is available for review at the
Commission in the Public Reference Room or may be viewed on the
Commission's Web site at http://www.ferc.gov using the ``eLibrary''

link. Enter the docket number excluding the last three digits in the
docket number field to access the document. For assistance, contact
FERC Online Support at<EMAIL_ADDRESS>or toll-free at 1-
866-208-3676, or for TTY,<PHONE_NUMBER>. A copy is also available for
inspection and reproduction at the address in item h above.
    n. You may also register online at http://www.ferc.goo.esubscribenow.htm
 to be notified via email of new filings

and issuances related to this or other pending projects. For
assistance, contact FERC Online Support.

    o. Scoping Process: The Commission staff intends to prepare a
single Environmental Assessment (EA) for the Danbury Hydroelectric
Project in accordance with the National Environmental Policy Act. The
EA will consider both site-specific and cumulative environmental
impacts and reasonable alternatives to the proposed action.
    Commission staff do not propose to conduct any on-site scoping
meetings at this time. Instead, we are soliciting comments,
recommendations, and information, on the Scoping Document (SD).
    Copies of the SD outlining the subject areas to be addressed in the
EA were distributed to the parties on the Commission's mailing list.
Copies of the SD may be viewed on the Web at http://www.ferc.gov using

the ``eLibrary'' link. Enter the docket number excluding the last three
digits in the docket number field to access the document. For
assistance, call 1-866-208-3676 or for TTY,<PHONE_NUMBER>.

Magalie R. Salas,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. E5-5498 Filed 10-5-05; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 6717-01-P


[Federal Register Volume 85, Number 114 (Friday, June 12, 2020)]
[Notices]
[Pages 35994-35995]
[FR Doc No: 2020-12717]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION

National Highway Traffic Safety Administration

[Docket No. NHTSA-2019-0130; Notice 1]

Goodyear Tire & Rubber Company, Receipt of Petition for Decision
of Inconsequential Noncompliance

AGENCY: National Highway Traffic Safety Administration (NHTSA),
Department of Transportation (DOT).

ACTION: Receipt of petition.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: Goodyear Tire & Rubber Company (Goodyear), has determined that
certain Kelly Armorsteel KDM 1 commercial truck tires do not comply
with Federal motor vehicle safety standards (FMVSS) No. 119, New
Pneumatic Tires for Motor Vehicles with a GVWR of more than 4,536
kilograms (10,000 pounds) and Motorcycles. Goodyear filed a
noncompliance report dated November 26, 2019, and petitioned NHTSA on
November 25, 2019, for a decision that the subject noncompliance is
inconsequential as it relates to motor vehicle safety. This document
announces receipt of Goodyear's petition.

DATES: The closing date for comments on the petition is July 13, 2020.

ADDRESSES: Interested persons are invited to submit written data,
views, and arguments on this petition. Comments must refer to the
docket and notice number cited in the title of this notice and may be
submitted by any of the following methods:
     Mail: Send comments by mail addressed to the U.S.
Department of Transportation, Docket Operations, M-30, West Building
Ground Floor, Room W12-140, 1200 New Jersey Avenue SE, Washington, DC
20590.
     Hand Delivery: Deliver comments by hand to the U.S.
Department of Transportation, Docket Operations, M-30, West Building
Ground Floor, Room W12-140, 1200 New Jersey Avenue SE, Washington, DC
20590. The Docket Section is open on weekdays from 10 a.m. to 5 p.m.
except for Federal Holidays.
     Electronically: Submit comments electronically by logging
onto the Federal Docket Management System (FDMS) website at https://www.regulations.gov/. Follow the online instructions for submitting
comments.
     Comments may also be faxed to<PHONE_NUMBER>.
    Comments must be written in the English language, and be no greater
than 15 pages in length, although there is no limit to the length of
necessary attachments to the comments. If comments are submitted in
hard copy form, please ensure that two copies are provided. If you wish
to receive confirmation that comments you have submitted by mail were
received, please enclose a stamped, self-addressed postcard with the
comments. Note that all comments received will be posted without change
to https://www.regulations.gov, including any personal information
provided.
    All comments and supporting materials received before the close of
business on the closing date indicated above will be filed in the
docket and will be considered. All comments and supporting materials
received after the closing date will also be filed and will be
considered to the fullest extent possible.
    When the petition is granted or denied, notice of the decision will
also be published in the Federal Register pursuant to the authority
indicated at the end of this notice.
    All comments, background documentation, and supporting materials
submitted to the docket may be viewed by anyone at the address and
times given above. The documents may also be viewed on the internet at
https://www.regulations.gov by following the online instructions for
accessing the dockets. The docket ID number for this

petition is shown in the heading of this notice.
    DOT's complete Privacy Act Statement is available for review in a
Federal Register notice published on April 11, 2000, (65 FR 19477-78).

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
    I. Overview: Goodyear has determined that certain Kelly Armorsteel
KDM 1 commercial truck tires do not fully comply with paragraph S6.5 of
FMVSS No. 119, New Pneumatic Tires for Motor Vehicles with a GVWR of
More than 4,536 kilograms (10,000 pounds) and Motorcycles (49 CFR
571.119). Goodyear filed a noncompliance report dated November 26,
2019, pursuant to 49 CFR part 573, Defect and Noncompliance
Responsibility and Reports, and petitioned NHTSA on November 25, 2019,
for an exemption from the notification and remedy requirements of 49
U.S.C. chapter 301 on the basis that this noncompliance is
inconsequential as it relates to motor vehicle safety, pursuant to 49
U.S.C. 30118(d) and 30120(h) and 49 CFR part 556, Exemption for
Inconsequential Defect or Noncompliance.
    This notice of receipt of Goodyear's petition is published under 49
U.S.C. 30118 and 30120 and does not represent any agency decision or
other exercise of judgment concerning the merits of the petition.
    II. Tires Involved: Approximately 76 Kelly Armorsteel KDM 1
commercial truck tires, size 11/R22.5 LRH, manufactured between August
25, 2019, and August 31, 2019, are potentially involved.
    III. Noncompliance: Goodyear explained that the noncompliance is
that the Tire Identification Number (TIN) on the subject tires contains
a date code that was engraved less than the required height of 0.51 mm
(0.020 inches) and, therefore, do not meet the requirements of
paragraph S6.5 of FMVSS No. 119.
    IV. Rule Requirements: Paragraph S6.5. of FMVSS No. 119 includes
the requirements relevant to this petition. Each tire shall be marked
on each sidewall with the information specified in paragraphs (a)
through (j) of this section. The markings shall be placed between the
maximum section width (exclusive of sidewall decorations or curb ribs)
and the bead on at least one sidewall, unless the maximum section width
of the tire is located in an area which is not more than one-fourth of
the distance from the bead to the shoulder of the tire. If the maximum
section width falls within that area, the markings shall appear between
the bead and a point one-half the distance from the bead to the
shoulder of the tire, on at least one sidewall. The markings shall be
in letters and numerals not less than 2 mm (0.078 inch) high and raised
above or sunk below the tire surface not less than 0.4 mm (0.015 inch),
except that the marking depth shall be not less than 0.25mm (0.010
inch) in the case of motorcycle tires.
    V. Summary of Goodyear's Petition: The following views and
arguments presented in this section are the views and arguments
provided by Goodyear. They have not been evaluated by the Agency and do
not reflect the views of the Agency.
    Accordingly, Goodyear described the subject noncompliance and
stated that the noncompliance is inconsequential as it relates to motor
vehicle safety.
    1. Goodyear believes this noncompliance is inconsequential to motor
vehicle safety because these tires were manufactured as designed and
meet or exceed all applicable FMVSS. All of the sidewall markings
related to tire service (load capacity, corresponding inflation
pressure, etc.) are correct. The mislabeling and irregular date code is
not a safety concern and has no impact on the retreading, repairing,
and recycling industries. The affected date code stencil has been
corrected, and all future production will not contain the irregularity
in the date code.
    2. Goodyear states that the date code portion of the TIN becomes
important in the event of a safety campaign, so that the consumer may
properly identify the recalled tire(s). In the unlikely event that a
safety campaign would ever become necessary for this Kelly Armorsteel
KDM 1 11/R22.5 LRH commercial truck tire made in the 34th week of 2019,
Goodyear would include in the listing of recalled TINs the TIN for
these tires with the date code portion as shown, MJ3TK2BW3419, as well
as the TIN for these tires with the date code portion shown with the
date code portion of the TIN below the regulation specified height so
that the consumer would know that tires with this TIN, MJ3TK2BW, are
included in the recall even if they have difficulty reading the date
code portion because it is not raised to the 0.51 mm level.
    Goodyear concluded by expressing the belief that the subject
noncompliance is inconsequential as it relates to motor vehicle safety,
and that its petition to be exempted from providing notification of the
noncompliance, as required by 49 U.S.C. 30118, and a remedy for the
noncompliance, as required by 49 U.S.C. 30120, should be granted.
    NHTSA notes that the statutory provisions (49 U.S.C. 30118(d) and
30120(h)) that permit manufacturers to file petitions for a
determination of inconsequentiality allow NHTSA to exempt manufacturers
only from the duties found in sections 30118 and 30120, respectively,
to notify owners, purchasers, and dealers of a defect or noncompliance
and to remedy the defect or noncompliance. Therefore, any decision on
this petition only applies to the subject tires that Goodyear no longer
controlled at the time it determined that the noncompliance existed.
However, any decision on this petition does not relieve equipment
distributors and dealers of the prohibitions on the sale, offer for
sale, or introduction or delivery for introduction into interstate
commerce of the noncompliant tires under their control after Goodyear
notified them that the subject noncompliance existed.

    Authority: (49 U.S.C. 30118, 30120: delegations of authority at
49 CFR 1.95 and 501.8)

Otto G. Matheke III,
Director, Office of Vehicle Safety Compliance.
[FR Doc. 2020-12717 Filed 6-11-20; 8:45 am]
 BILLING CODE 4910-59-P


[Federal Register Volume 79, Number 72 (Tuesday, April 15, 2014)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Pages 21126-21127]
[FR Doc No: 2014-08445]

=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES

Food and Drug Administration

21 CFR Part 522

[Docket No. FDA-2014-N-0002]

New Animal Drugs; Ceftiofur Sodium; Gentamicin; Xylazine

AGENCY: Food and Drug Administration, HHS.

ACTION: Final rule; technical amendment.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Food and Drug Administration (FDA) is amending the animal
drug regulations to reflect approval actions for new animal drug
applications (NADAs) and abbreviated new animal drug applications
(ANADAs) during March 2014. FDA is also informing the public of the
availability of summaries of the basis of approval and of environmental
review documents, where applicable. The animal drug regulations are
also being amended to reflect a change of sponsorship for an ANADA.

DATES: This rule is effective April 15, 2014.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: George K. Haibel, Center for
Veterinary Medicine (HFV-6), Food and Drug Administration, 7519
Standish Pl., Rockville, MD 20855,<PHONE_NUMBER>,
<EMAIL_ADDRESS>
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: FDA is amending the animal drug regulations
to reflect approval actions for NADAs and ANADAs during March 2014, as
listed in table 1. In addition, FDA is informing the public of the
availability, where applicable, of documentation of environmental
review required under the National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA) and,
for actions requiring review of safety or effectiveness data, summaries
of the basis of approval (FOI Summaries) under the Freedom of
Information Act (FOIA). These public documents may be seen in the
Division of Dockets Management (HFA-305), Food and Drug Administration,
5630 Fishers Lane, rm. 1061, Rockville, MD 20852, between 9 a.m. and 4
p.m., Monday through Friday. Persons with access to the Internet may
obtain these documents at the Center for Veterinary Medicine FOIA
Electronic Reading Room: http://www.fda.gov/AboutFDA/CentersOffices/OfficeofFoods/CVM/CVMFOIAElectronicReadingRoom/default.htm. Marketing
exclusivity and patent information may be accessed in FDA's
publication, Approved Animal Drug Products Online (Green Book) at:
http://www.fda.gov/AnimalVeterinary/Products/ApprovedAnimalDrugProducts/default.htm.
    Also, the regulations are being amended to reflect the previous
approval of revised food safety warnings for ceftiofur sodium powder
for injection. This amendment is being made to improve the accuracy of
the regulations.
    This rule does not meet the definition of ``rule'' in 5 U.S.C.
804(3)(A) because it is a rule of ``particular applicability.''
Therefore, it is not subject to the congressional review requirements
in 5 U.S.C. 801-808.

                 Table 1--Original and Supplemental NADAs and ANADAs Approved During March 2014
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
                                    New animal drug                      21 CFR
  NADA/ ANADA         Sponsor        product name         Action        Section    FOIA  Summary   NEPA  Review
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
200-468........  Cross Vetpharm    GENTAMED-P for    Original           522.1044  yes...........  CE.1 2
                  Group Ltd.,       Poultry           approval as a
                  Broomhill Rd.,    (gentamicin       generic copy of
                  Tallaght,         sulfate)          NADA 101-862.
                  Dublin 24,        Injection.
                  Ireland.
200-529........  Cross Vetpharm    XYLAMED           Original           522.2662  yes...........  CE.1 2
                  Group Ltd.,       (xylazine)        approval as a
                  Broomhill Rd.,    Injection.        generic copy of
                  Tallaght,                           NADA 047-956.
                  Dublin 24,
                  Ireland.
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
\1\ The Agency has determined under 21 CFR 25.33 that this action is categorically excluded (CE) from the
  requirement to submit an environmental assessment or an environmental impact statement because it is of a type
  that does not individually or cumulatively have a significant effect on the human environment.
\2\ CE granted under 21 CFR 25.33(a)(1).

List of Subjects in 21 CFR Part 522

    Animal drugs.

    Therefore, under the Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act and under
authority delegated to the Commissioner of Food and Drugs and
redelegated to the Center for Veterinary Medicine, 21 CFR part 522 is
amended as follows:

PART 522--IMPLANTATION OR INJECTABLE DOSAGE FORM NEW ANIMAL DRUGS

0
1. The authority citation for 21 CFR part 522 continues to read as
follows:

    Authority:  21 U.S.C. 360b.

0
2. In 522.313c, revise paragraph (d) to read as follows:

Sec.  522.313c  Ceftiofur sodium.

* * * * *
    (d) Special considerations. Federal law restricts this drug to use
by or on the order of a licensed veterinarian. Federal law prohibits
extra-label use of this drug in cattle, swine, chickens, and turkeys
for disease prevention purposes; at unapproved doses, frequencies,
durations, or routes of administration; and in unapproved major food-
producing species/production classes.
* * * * *

Sec.  522.1044  [Amended]

0
3. In Sec.  522.1044, in paragraph (b)(4), remove ``No. 000859'' and in
its place add ``Nos. 000859 and 061623''.

Sec.  522.2662  [Amended]

0
4. In Sec.  522.2662, in paragraph (b)(2), remove ``No. 000010'' and in
its place add '' Nos. 000010 and 061623''.

    Dated: April 9, 2014.
Bernadette Dunham,
Director, Center for Veterinary Medicine.
[FR Doc. 2014-08445 Filed 4-14-14; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4160-01-P