[Federal Register Volume 80, Number 152 (Friday, August 7, 2015)]
[Notices]
[Page 47503]
[FR Doc No: 2015-19493]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY

Federal Emergency Management Agency

[Internal Agency Docket No. FEMA-4223-DR; Docket ID FEMA-2015-0002]

Texas; Amendment No. 8 to Notice of a Major Disaster Declaration

AGENCY: Federal Emergency Management Agency, DHS.

ACTION: Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: This notice amends the notice of a major disaster declaration
for the State of Texas (FEMA-4223-DR), dated May 29, 2015, and related
determinations.

DATES: Effective Date: July 17, 2015.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Dean Webster, Office of Response and
Recovery, Federal Emergency Management Agency, 500 C Street SW.,
Washington, DC 20472,<PHONE_NUMBER>.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The notice of a major disaster declaration
for the State of Texas is hereby amended to include the following areas
among those areas determined to have been adversely affected by the
event declared a major disaster by the President in his declaration of
May 29, 2015.

    Shelby County for Individual Assistance.
    Hood, Madison, and Wharton Counties for Individual Assistance
(already designated for Public Assistance).

The following Catalog of Federal Domestic Assistance Numbers (CFDA)
are to be used for reporting and drawing funds: 97.030, Community
Disaster Loans; 97.031, Cora Brown Fund; 97.032, Crisis Counseling;
97.033, Disaster Legal Services; 97.034, Disaster Unemployment
Assistance (DUA); 97.046, Fire Management Assistance Grant; 97.048,
Disaster Housing Assistance to Individuals and Households In
Presidentially Declared Disaster Areas; 97.049, Presidentially
Declared Disaster Assistance--Disaster Housing Operations for
Individuals and Households; 97.050 Presidentially Declared Disaster
Assistance to Individuals and Households--Other Needs; 97.036,
Disaster Grants--Public Assistance (Presidentially Declared
Disasters); 97.039, Hazard Mitigation Grant.

W. Craig Fugate,
Administrator, Federal Emergency Management Agency.
[FR Doc. 2015-19493 Filed 8-6-15; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 9111-23-P


[Federal Register Volume 76, Number 216 (Tuesday, November 8, 2011)]
[Proposed Rules]
[Pages 69171-69172]
[FR Doc No: 2011-28516]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION

Federal Aviation Administration

14 CFR Part 183

[Docket No. FAA-2011-1149]

Clarification of Policy Regarding Designated Aircraft Dispatcher
Examiners

AGENCY: Federal Aviation Administration (FAA), Department of
Transportation (DOT).

ACTION: Notice of availability; request for comment.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: This document announces the availability of a revised section
of FAA Order 8900.1, regarding the qualification, authority, and
limitations of Designated Aircraft Dispatcher Examiners (DADEs). This
section provides guidance to FAA employees on the responsibilities,
qualifications, and oversight of DADEs under 14 CFR part 183. Under
this proposed revision, the FAA is clarifying its policy regarding the
qualifications, privileges, and limitations of these designees, in
addition to establishing guidelines for DADEs when testing applicants
for an Aircraft Dispatcher Certificate. Upon review of the comments and
any necessary revision, this Order would cancel and replace FAA Order
8900.1, Volume 5, Chapter 5, Section 10, and Volume 13, Chapter 3,
Sections 1-4, issued September 13, 2007.

DATES: Written comments must be received on or before December 8, 2011.

ADDRESSES: Send comments identified by docket number FAA-2011-1149
using any of the following methods:
     Federal eRulemaking Portal: Go to http://www.regulations.gov and follow the online instructions for sending your
comments electronically.
     Mail: Send comments to Docket Operations, M-30; U.S.
Department of Transportation (DOT), 1200 New Jersey Avenue SE., Room
W12-140, West Building Ground Floor, Washington, DC 20590-0001.
     Hand Delivery or Courier: Take comments to Docket
Operations in Room W12-140 of the West Building Ground Floor at 1200
New Jersey Avenue SE., Washington, DC, between 9 a.m. and 5 p.m.,
Monday through Friday, except Federal holidays.
     Fax: Fax comments to Docket Operations at<PHONE_NUMBER>.
    Privacy: The FAA will post all comments it receives, without
change, to http://www.regulations.gov, including any personal
information the commenter provides. Using the search function of the
docket web site, anyone can find and read the electronic form of all
comments received into any FAA dockets, including the name of the
individual sending the comment (or signing the comment for an
association, business, labor union, etc.). DOT's complete Privacy Act
Statement can be found in the Federal Register published on April 11,
2000 (65 FR 19477-19478), as well as at http://DocketsInfo.dot.gov.
    Docket: Background documents or comments received may be read at
http://www.regulations.gov at any time. Follow the online instructions
for accessing the docket or Docket Operations in Room W12-140 of the
West Building Ground Floor at 1200 New Jersey Avenue SE., Washington,
DC, between 9 a.m. and 5 p.m., Monday through Friday, except Federal
holidays.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Theodora Kessaris, Technical Programs
Branch, Air Transportation Division, Flight Standards Service, Federal
Aviation Administration, 800 Independence Avenue SW., Washington, DC
20591; telephone:<PHONE_NUMBER>; facsimile:<PHONE_NUMBER>; email:
<EMAIL_ADDRESS>
Background

    FAA Order 8900.1, Flight Standards Information Management System,
was issued on September 13, 2007. This order consolidated and replaced
FAA Orders 8300.1, 8400.1, and 8700.1, the FAA's guidance to
inspectors. Included in FAA Order 8900.1 is guidance regarding FAA
oversight of various designees authorized under 14 CFR part 183.
Designees are private persons that the FAA Administrator has designated
to act as his representative in examining, inspecting and testing
persons and aircraft for the purpose of issuing airman, operating and
aircraft certificates. Included in the list of persons the
Administrator may designate to perform these functions on his behalf
are Designated Aircraft Dispatch Examiners (DADEs). Pursuant to 14 CFR
183.25(f), these designees may accept applications for and conduct
written and practical tests for issuing aircraft dispatcher
certificates under part 65. In some instances, DADEs may be authorized
to issue temporary aircraft

dispatcher certificates to qualified applicants.
    The provisions in 14 CFR part 183 do not establish qualification
requirements for DADEs. In October 2008, the FAA published guidance for
inspectors that addressed DADE qualifications and the FAA's oversight
of DADEs. This guidance was not published for public comment. This
proposed revision of the Order would clarify the 2008 guidance and
include the following significant information:
     A DADE will not test outside of the geographic limits of
the Certificate Holding District Office (CHDO) without prior permission
from the CHDO.
    This limitation is necessary to ensure proper oversight and
monitoring of the administration of these tests by the appropriate FAA
district office.
     A DADE will not be an employee of a 14 CFR part 65 course
operator.
    This limitation is necessary due to the potential for a conflict-
of-interest which could occur based on the requirement under Sec.
65.63(c)(1) for a course operator to maintain an 80% pass rate of its
graduates, on the first testing attempt, as a condition for renewal of
a course. The FAA is concerned that a DADE employed by such a course
operator might not be objective when administering a test to an
applicant who has graduated from the DADE's employer or affiliate.
     Time spent testing an applicant should be no more than 6
hours.
    This time period is based on the national average which was
verified by Aviation Safety Inspectors with oversight responsibility of
DADEs. This time period takes into account the extensive requirements
of the Aircraft Dispatcher Practical Test Standards (PTS), and the
ability of a candidate for an aircraft dispatcher certificate to
demonstrate his or her ability to manage a typical aircraft
dispatcher's workload by completing each task in a timely manner.
     A DADE will not test more than one applicant for an
aircraft dispatcher certificate at a time.
    This limitation is intended to establish consistency with the FAA's
already established policy for initial pilot certification.
     A DADE will not administer more than two Aircraft
Dispatcher Practical Tests in a single day.
    This limitation takes in to account the testing of a single
applicant at a time, and an overall test time of approximately 6 hours
per applicant, not including the time it takes to complete the
application paper work. This policy is also consistent with that which
is applicable to pilot testing.
    While the FAA generally does not request comment on internal
orders, the agency has established a docket for public comments
regarding this guidance for inspectors in recognition of the interest
of current DADEs and applicants for an aircraft dispatcher certificate
under part 65. The agency will consider all comments received by
December 8, 2011. Comments received after that date may be considered
if consideration will not delay agency action on the review. A copy of
the proposed order is available for review in the assigned docket for
the Order at http://www.regulations.gov.

    Issued in Washington, DC, on October 26, 2011.
John M. Allen,
Director, Flight Standards Service.
[FR Doc. 2011-28516 Filed 11-7-11; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910-13-P


[Federal Register: August 2, 2006 (Volume 71, Number 148)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Page 43664-43667]
[DOCID:fr02au06-9]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY

40 CFR Part 180

[EPA-HQ-OPP-2006-0307; FRL-8079-9]

Inert Ingredients; Revocation of Two Tolerance Exemptions

AGENCY: Environmental Protection Agency (EPA).

ACTION: Final rule.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: EPA is revoking two exemptions from the requirement of a
tolerance that are associated with two inert ingredients (ethylene
glycol monomethyl ether and methylene blue) because these substances
are no longer contained in active Federal Insecticide, Fungicide, and
Rodenticide Act (FIFRA) pesticide product registrations. These
ingredients are subject to reassessment by August 2006 under section
408(q) of the Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act (FFDCA), as amended
by the Food Quality Protection Act of 1996 (FQPA). The two tolerance
exemptions are considered ``reassessed'' for purposes of FFDCA's
section 408(q) and count as a tolerance reassessment toward the August
2006 review deadline.

DATES: This rule is effective August 2, 2006. Objections and requests
for hearings must be received on or before October 2, 2006, and must be
filed in accordance with the instructions provided in 40 CFR part 178
(see also Unit I.C. of the SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION).

ADDRESSES: EPA has established a docket for this action under docket
identification (ID) number EPA-HQ-OPP-2006-0307. All documents in the
docket are listed in the index for the docket. Although listed in the
index, some information is not publicly available, e.g., Confidential
Business Information (CBI) or other information whose disclosure is
restricted by statute. Certain other material, such as copyrighted
material, is not placed on the Internet and will be publicly available
only in hard copy form. Publicly available docket materials are
available in the electronic docket at http://www.regulations.gov, or,

if only available in hard copy, at the OPP Regulatory Public Docket in
Rm. S-4400, One Potomac Yard (South Bldg.), 2777 S. Crystal Dr.,
Arlington, VA. The Docket Facility is open from 8:30 a.m. to 4 p.m.,
Monday through Friday, excluding legal holidays. The Docket Facility
telephone number is<PHONE_NUMBER>.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Karen Angulo, Registration Division
(7505P), Office of Pesticide Programs, Environmental Protection Agency,
1200 Pennsylvania Ave., NW., Washington, DC 20460-0001; telephone
number:<PHONE_NUMBER>; e-mail address<EMAIL_ADDRESS>
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

I. General Information

A. Does this Action Apply to Me?

    You may be potentially affected by this action if you are an
agricultural producer, food manufacturer, or pesticide manufacturer.
Potentially affected entities may include, but are not limited to:
     Crop production (NAICS code 111).
     Animal production (NAICS code 112).
     Food manufacturing (NAICS code 311).
     Pesticide manufacturing (NAICS code 32532).

    This listing is not intended to be exhaustive, but rather provides
a guide for readers regarding entities likely to be affected by this
action. Other types of entities not listed in this unit could also be
affected. The North American Industrial Classification System (NAICS)
codes have been provided to assist you and others in determining
whether this action might apply to certain entities. To determine
whether you or your business may be affected by this action, you should
carefully examine the applicability provisions in Unit II. If you have
any questions regarding the applicability of this action to a
particular entity, consult the person listed under FOR FURTHER
INFORMATION CONTACT.

B. How Can I Access Electronic Copies of this Document?

    In addition to accessing an electronic copy of this Federal
Register document through the electronic docket athttp://www.regulations.gov
, you may access this ``Federal Register'' document

electronically through the EPA Internet under the ``Federal Register''
listings at http://www.epa.gov/fedrgstr. You may also access a

frequently updated electronic version of 40 CFR part 180 through the
Government Printing Office's pilot e-CFR site at http://www.gpoaccess.gov/ecfr
.

C. Can I File an Objection or Hearing Request?

    Under section 408(g) of the FFDCA, as amended by the FQPA, any
person may file an objection to any aspect of this regulation and may
also request a hearing on those objections. The EPA procedural
regulations which govern the submission of objections and requests for
hearings appear in 40 CFR part 178. You must file your objection or
request a hearing on this regulation in accordance with the
instructions provided in 40 CFR part 178. To ensure proper receipt by
EPA, you must identify docket ID number EPA-HQ-OPP-2006-0307 in the
subject line on the first page of your submission. All requests must be
in writing, and must be mailed or delivered to the Hearing Clerk on or
before October 2, 2006.
    In addition to filing an objection or hearing request with the
Hearing Clerk as described in 40 CFR part 178, please submit a copy of
the filing that does not contain any CBI for inclusion in the public
docket that is described in ADDRESSES. Information not marked
confidential pursuant to 40 CFR part 2 may be disclosed publicly by EPA
without prior notice. Submit your copies, identified by docket ID
number EPA-HQ-OPP-2006-0307, by one of the following methods.
     Federal eRulemaking Portal: http://www.regulations.gov.

Follow the on-line instructions for submitting comments.
     Mail: Office of Pesticide Programs (OPP) Regulatory Public
Docket (7502P), Environmental Protection Agency, 1200 Pennsylvania
Ave., NW., Washington, DC 20460-0001.
     Delivery: OPP Regulatory Public Docket (7502P),
Environmental Protection Agency, Rm. S-4400, One Potomac Yard (South
Bldg.), 2777 S. Crystal Drive, Arlington, VA. Deliveries are only
accepted during the Docket's normal hours of operation (8:30 a.m. to 4
p.m., Monday through Friday, excluding legal holidays). Special
arrangements should be made for deliveries of boxed information. The
Docket Facility telephone number is<PHONE_NUMBER>.

II. Background and Statutory Findings

A. What Action is the Agency Taking?

    In the Federal Register of May 3, 2006 (71 FR 26001) (FRL-8068-3),
EPA issued a proposed rule to revoke two exemptions from the
requirement of a tolerance that are associated with two inert
ingredients because those substances are no longer contained in
pesticide products. The proposed rule provided a 60-day comment period
that invited public comment for consideration and for support of
tolerance exemption retention under the FFDCA standards.
    In this final rule, EPA is revoking two exemptions from the
requirement of a tolerance that are associated with two inert
ingredients because these specific tolerance exemptions correspond to
uses no longer current or registered under FIFRA in the United States.
The tolerance exemptions revoked by this final rule are no longer
necessary to cover residues of the relevant pesticide chemicals in or
on domestically treated commodities or commodities treated outside but
imported into the United States.
    EPA has historically been concerned that retention of tolerances
and tolerance exemptions that are not necessary to cover residues in or
on legally treated foods may encourage misuse of pesticides within the
United States. Thus, it is EPA's policy to issue a final rule revoking
those tolerances and tolerance exemptions for residues of pesticide
chemicals for which there are no active registrations or uses under
FIFRA, unless any person commenting on the proposal demonstrates a need
for the tolerance to cover residues in or on imported commodities or
domestic commodities legally treated.
    Generally, EPA will proceed with the revocation of these tolerances
and tolerance exemptions on the grounds discussed in Unit II. if one of
the following conditions applies:
    1. Prior to EPA's issuance of a section 408(f) order requesting
additional data or issuance of a section 408(d) or (e) order revoking
the tolerances or tolerance exemptions on other grounds, commenters
retract the comment identifying a need for the tolerance to be
retained.
    2. EPA independently verifies that the tolerance or tolerance
exemption is no longer needed.
    3. The tolerance or tolerance exemption is not supported by data
that demonstrate that the tolerance or tolerance exemption meets the
requirements under FQPA.
    No comments were received on the proposed rule. Therefore, for the
reasons stated herein and in the proposed rule, EPA is revoking the two
exemptions from the requirement of a tolerance identified in the
Federal Register Notice of May 3, 2006 (71 FR 26001).

B. What is the Agency's Authority for Taking this Action?

    This final rule is issued pursuant to section 408(d) of FFDCA (21
U.S.C. 346a(d)). Section 408 of FFDCA authorizes the establishment of
tolerances, exemptions from the requirement of a tolerance,
modifications in tolerances, and revocation of tolerances for residues
of pesticide chemicals in or on raw agricultural commodities and
processed foods. Without a tolerance or tolerance exemption, food
containing pesticide residues is considered to be unsafe and therefore
``adulterated'' under section 402(a) of the FFDCA. If food containing
pesticide residues is found to be adulterated, the food may not be
distributed in interstate commerce (21 U.S.C. 331(a) and 342 (a)).
    EPA's general practice is to revoke tolerances and tolerance
exemptions for residues of pesticide chemicals on crops for which FIFRA
registrations no longer exist and on which the pesticide may therefore
no longer be used in the United States. EPA has historically been
concerned that retention of tolerances and tolerance exemptions that
are not necessary to cover residues in or on legally treated foods may
encourage misuse of pesticides within the United States. Nonetheless,
EPA will establish and maintain tolerances and tolerance exemptions
even when corresponding domestic uses are canceled if the tolerances,
which EPA refers to as

``import tolerances,'' are necessary to allow importation into the
United States of food containing such pesticide residues. However,
where there are no imported commodities that require these import
tolerances, the Agency believes it is appropriate to revoke tolerances
and tolerance exemptions for unregistered pesticide chemicals in order
to prevent potential misuse.

C. When Do These Actions Become Effective?

    These actions become effective on August 2, 2006. Any commodities
listed in the regulatory text of this document that are treated with
the pesticide chemicals subject to this final rule, and that are in the
channels of trade following the tolerance exemption revocations, shall
be subject to FFDCA section 408(1)(5), as established by the FQPA.
Under this section, any residues of these pesticide chemicals in or on
such food shall not render the food adulterated so long as it is shown
to the satisfaction of the Food and Drug Administration that:
    1. The residue is present as the result of an application or use of
the pesticide chemical at a time and in a manner that was lawful under
FIFRA, and
    2. The residue does not exceed the level that was authorized at the
time of the application or use to be present on the food under an
exemption from a tolerance. Evidence to show that food was lawfully
treated may include records that verify the dates that the pesticide
chemical was applied to such food.

 D. What Is the Contribution to Tolerance Reassessment?

    By law, EPA is required by August 2006, to reassess the tolerances
and exemptions from tolerances that were in existence on August 2,
1996. This document revokes two inert ingredient tolerance exemptions
which are counted as tolerance reassessments toward the August 2006
review deadline under FFDCA section 408(q), as amended by FQPA in 1996.

III. Statutory and Executive Order Reviews

    In this final rule, EPA is revoking specific tolerance exemptions
established under section 408(d) of FFDCA. The Office of Management and
Budget (OMB) has exempted this type of action from review under
Executive Order 12866, entitled Regulatory Planning and Review (58 FR
51735, October 4, 1993). Because this rule has been exempted from
review under Executive Order 12866 due to its lack of significance,
this final rule is not subject to Executive Order 13211, Actions
Concerning Regulations That Significantly Affect Energy Supply,
Distribution, or Use (66 FR 28355, May 22, 2001). This final rule does
not contain any information collections subject to OMB approval under
the Paperwork Reduction Act (PRA), 44 U.S.C. 3501et seq., or impose any
enforceable duty or contain any unfunded mandate as described under
Title II of the Unfunded Mandates Reform Act of 1995 (UMRA) (Public Law
104-4). Nor does it require any special considerations under Executive
Order 12898, entitled Federal Actions to Address Environmental Justice
in Minority Populations and Low-Income Populations (59 FR 7629,
February 16, 1994); or OMB review or any Agency action under Executive
Order 13045, entitled Protection of Children from Environmental Health
Risks and Safety Risks (62 FR 19885, April 23, 1997). This action does
not involve any technical standards that would require Agency
consideration of voluntary consensus standards pursuant to section
12(d) of the National Technology Transfer and Advancement Act of 1995
(NTTAA), Public Law 104-113, section 12(d) (15 U.S.C. 272 note).
Pursuant to the Regulatory Flexibility Act (RFA) (5 U.S.C. 601et seq.),
the Agency previously assessed whether revocations of tolerances might
significantly impact a substantial number of small entities and
concluded that, as a general matter, these actions do not impose a
significant economic impact on a substantial number of small entities.
This analysis was published on December 17, 1997 (62 FR 66020), and was
provided to the Chief Counsel for Advocacy of the Small Business
Administration. Taking into account this analysis, and available
information concerning the pesticide listed in this rule, the Agency
hereby certifies that this final action will not have a significant
economic impact on a substantial number of small entities. In a
memorandum dated May 25, 2001, EPA determined that eight conditions
must all be satisfied in order for an import tolerance or tolerance
exemption revocation to adversely affect a significant number of small
entity importers, and that there is a negligible joint probability of
all eight conditions holding simultaneously with respect to any
particular revocation. (This Agency document is available in the docket
of this final rule). Furthermore, for the pesticides named in this
final rule, the Agency knows of no extraordinary circumstances that
exist as to the present revocations that would change the EPA's
previous analysis. In addition, the Agency has determined that this
action will not have a substantial direct effect on States, on the
relationship between the national government and the States, or on the
distribution of power and responsibilities among the various levels of
government, as specified in Executive Order 13132, entitled Federalism
(64 FR 43255, August 10, 1999). Executive Order 13132 requires EPA to
develop an accountable process to ensure ``meaningful and timely input
by State and local officials in the development of regulatory policies
that have federalism implications.'' ``Policies that have federalism
implications'' is defined in the Executive Order to include regulations
that have ``substantial direct effects on the States, on the
relationship between the national government and the States, or on the
distribution of power and responsibilities among the various levels of
government.'' This final rule directly regulates growers, food
processors, food handlers and food retailers, not States. This action
does not alter the relationships or distribution of power and
responsibilities established by Congress in the preemption provisions
of section 408(n)(4) of FFDCA. For these same reasons, the Agency has
determined that this final rule does not have any ``tribal
implications'' as described in Executive Order 13175, entitled
Consultation and Coordination with Indian Tribal Governments (65 FR
67249, November 6, 2000). Executive Order 13175, requires EPA to
develop an accountable process to ensure ``meaningful and timely input
by tribal officials in the development of regulatory policies that have
tribal implications.'' ``Policies that have tribal implications'' is
defined in the Executive Order to include regulations that have
``substantial direct effects on one or more Indian tribes, on the
relationship between the Federal Government and the Indian tribes, or
on the distribution of power and responsibilities between the Federal
Government and Indian tribes.'' This final rule will not have
substantial direct effects on tribal governments, on the relationship
between the Federal Government and Indian tribes, or on the
distribution of power and responsibilities between the Federal
Government and Indian tribes, as specified in Executive Order 13175.
Thus, Executive Order 13175 does not apply to this final rule.

IV. Congressional Review Act

    The Congressional Review Act, 5 U.S.C. 801 et seq., as added by the
Small Business Regulatory Enforcement Fairness Act of 1996, generally
provides

that before a rule may take effect, the Agency promulgating the rule
must submit a rule report, which includes a copy of the rule, to each
House of the Congress and the Comptroller General of the United States.
EPA will submit a report containing this rule and other required
information to the U.S. Senate, the U.S. House of Representatives, and
the Comptroller General of the United States prior to publication of
the rule in the Federal Register. This rule is not a ``major rule'' as
defined by 5 U.S.C. 804(2).

List of Subjects in 40 CFR Part 180

    Environmental protection, Administrative practice and procedure,
Agricultural commodities, Pesticides and pests, Reporting and
recordkeeping requirements.

    Dated: July 24, 2006.
Lois Rossi,
Director, Registration Division, Office of Pesticide Programs.

0
Therefore, 40 CFR chapter I is amended as follows:

PART 180--[AMENDED]

0
1. The authority citation for part 180 continues to read as follows:

    Authority: 21 U.S.C. 321(q), 346a and 371.

Sec.  180.920  [Amended]

0
2. In Sec.  180.920, the table is amended by removing the entries for
``Ethylene glycol monomethyl ether'' and ``Methylene blue.''

[FR Doc. E6-12344 Filed 8-1-06; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 6560-50-S