VerDate Dec< 13> 2002 09: 09 Dec 30, 2002 Jkt 200001 PO 00000 Frm 00094 Fmt 4701 Sfmt 4700 E:\ FR\ FM\ 31DER3. SGM 31DER3 80279 Federal Register / Vol. 67, No. 251 / Tuesday, December 31, 2002 / Rules and Regulations ( 51) Reviewing authority means the State air pollution control agency, local agency, other State agency, Indian tribe, or other agency authorized by the Administrator to carry out a permit program under § 51.165 and § 51.166 of this chapter, or the Administrator in the case of EPA implemented permit programs under this section. ( 52) Project means a physical change in, or change in the method of operation of, an existing major stationary source. ( 53) Lowest achievable emission rate ( LAER) is as defined in § 51.165( a)( 1)( xiii) of this chapter. ( 54) Reasonably available control technology ( RACT) is as defined in § 51.100( o) of this chapter. * * * * * ( i) Exemptions. * * * * * * * * ( r) * * * ( 5) [ Reserved] ( 6) The provisions of this paragraph ( r)( 6) apply to projects at an existing emissions unit at a major stationary source ( other than projects at a Clean Unit or at a source with a PAL) in circumstances where there is a reasonable possibility that a project that is not a part of a major modification may result in a significant emissions increase and the owner or operator elects to use the method specified in paragraphs ( b)( 41)( ii)( a) through ( c) of this section for calculating projected actual emissions. ( i) Before beginning actual construction of the project, the owner or operator shall document and maintain a record of the following information: ( a) A description of the project; ( b) Identification of the emissions unit( s) whose emissions of a regulated NSR pollutant could be affected by the project; and ( c) A description of the applicability test used to determine that the project is not a major modification for any regulated NSR pollutant, including the baseline actual emissions, the projected actual emissions, the amount of emissions excluded under paragraph ( b)( 41)( ii)( c) of this section and an explanation for why such amount was excluded, and any netting calculations, if applicable. ( ii) If the emissions unit is an existing electric utility steam generating unit, before beginning actual construction, the owner or operator shall provide a copy of the information set out in paragraph ( r)( 6)( i) of this section to the Administrator. Nothing in this paragraph ( r)( 6)( ii) shall be construed to require the owner or operator of such a unit to obtain any determination from the Administrator before beginning actual construction. ( iii) The owner or operator shall monitor the emissions of any regulated NSR pollutant that could increase as a result of the project and that is emitted by any emissions unit identified in paragraph ( r)( 6)( i)( b) of this section; and calculate and maintain a record of the annual emissions, in tons per year on a calendar year basis, for a period of 5 years following resumption of regular operations after the change, or for a period of 10 years following resumption of regular operations after the change if the project increases the design capacity of or potential to emit that regulated NSR pollutant at such emissions unit. ( iv) If the unit is an existing electric utility steam generating unit, the owner or operator shall submit a report to the Administrator within 60 days after the end of each year during which records must be generated under paragraph ( r)( 6)( iii) of this section setting out the unit's annual emissions during the calendar year that preceded submission of the report. ( v) If the unit is an existing unit other than an electric utility steam generating unit, the owner or operator shall submit a report to the Administrator if the annual emissions, in tons per year, from the project identified in paragraph ( r)( 6)( i) of this section, exceed the baseline actual emissions ( as documented and maintained pursuant to paragraph ( r)( 6)( i)( c) of this section), by a significant amount ( as defined in paragraph ( b)( 23) of this section) for that regulated NSR pollutant, and if such emissions differ from the preconstruction projection as documented and maintained pursuant to paragraph ( r)( 6)( i)( c) of this section. Such report shall be submitted to the Administrator within 60 days after the end of such year. The report shall contain the following: ( a) The name, address and telephone number of the major stationary source; ( b) The annual emissions as calculated pursuant to paragraph ( r)( 6)( iii) of this section; and ( c) Any other information that the owner or operator wishes to include in the report ( e. g., an explanation as to why the emissions differ from the preconstruction projection). ( 7) The owner or operator of the source shall make the information required to be documented and maintained pursuant to paragraph ( r)( 6) of this section available for review upon a request for inspection by the Administrator or the general public pursuant to the requirements contained in § 70.4( b)( 3)( viii) of this chapter. * * * * * ( x) Clean Unit Test for emissions units that are subject to BACT or LAER. An owner or operator of a major stationary source has the option of using the Clean Unit Test to determine whether emissions increases at a Clean Unit are part of a project that is a major modification according to the provisions in paragraphs ( x)( 1) through ( 9) of this section. ( 1) Applicability. The provisions of this paragraph ( x) apply to any emissions unit for which a reviewing authority has issued a major NSR permit within the last 10 years. ( 2) General provisions for Clean Units. The provisions in paragraphs ( x)( 2)( i) through ( iv) of this section apply to a Clean Unit. ( i) Any project for which the owner or operator begins actual construction after the effective date of the Clean Unit designation ( as determined in accordance with paragraph ( x)( 4) of this section) and before the expiration date ( as determined in accordance with paragraph ( x)( 5) of this section) will be considered to have occurred while the emissions unit was a Clean Unit. ( ii) If a project at a Clean Unit does not cause the need for a change in the emission limitations or work practice requirements in the permit for the unit that were adopted in conjunction with BACT and the project would not alter any physical or operational characteristics that formed the basis for the BACT determination as specified in paragraph ( x)( 6)( iv) of this section, the emissions unit remains a Clean Unit. ( iii) If a project causes the need for a change in the emission limitations or work practice requirements in the permit for the unit that were adopted in conjunction with BACT or the project would alter any physical or operational characteristics that formed the basis for the BACT determination as specified in paragraph ( x)( 6)( iv) of this section, then the emissions unit loses its designation as a Clean Unit upon issuance of the necessary permit revisions ( unless the unit re qualifies as a Clean Unit pursuant to paragraph ( x)( 3)( iii) of this section). If the owner or operator begins actual construction on the project without first applying to revise the emissions unit's permit, the Clean Unit designation ends immediately prior to the time when actual construction begins. ( iv) A project that causes an emissions unit to lose its designation as a Clean Unit is subject to the applicability requirements of paragraphs ( a)( 2)( iv)( a) through ( d) and paragraph ( a)( 2)( iv)( f) of this section as if the emissions unit is not a Clean Unit. ( 3) Qualifying or re qualifying to use the Clean Unit Applicability Test. An emissions unit automatically qualifies VerDate Dec< 13> 2002 09: 09 Dec 30, 2002 Jkt 200001 PO 00000 Frm 00095 Fmt 4701 Sfmt 4700 E:\ FR\ FM\ 31DER3. SGM 31DER3 80280 Federal Register / Vol. 67, No. 251 / Tuesday, December 31, 2002 / Rules and Regulations as a Clean Unit when the unit meets the criteria in paragraphs ( x)( 3)( i) and ( ii) of this section. After the original Clean Unit expires in accordance with paragraph ( x)( 5) of this section or is lost pursuant to paragraph ( x)( 2)( iii) of this section, such emissions unit may requalify as a Clean Unit under either paragraph ( x)( 3)( iii) of this section, or under the Clean Unit provisions in paragraph ( y) of this section. To requalify as a Clean Unit under paragraph ( x)( 3)( iii) of this section, the emissions unit must obtain a new major NSR permit issued through the applicable PSD program and meet all the criteria in paragraph ( x)( 3)( iii) of this section. The Clean Unit designation applies individually for each pollutant emitted by the emissions unit. ( i) Permitting requirement. The emissions unit must have received a major NSR permit within the last 10 years. The owner or operator must maintain and be able to provide information that would demonstrate that this permitting requirement is met. ( ii) Qualifying air pollution control technologies. Air pollutant emissions from the emissions unit must be reduced through the use of air pollution control technology ( which includes pollution prevention as defined under paragraph ( b)( 39) of this section or work practices) that meets both the following requirements in paragraphs ( x)( 3)( ii)( a) and ( b) of this section. ( a) The control technology achieves the BACT or LAER level of emissions reductions as determined through issuance of a major NSR permit within the past 10 years. However, the emissions unit is not eligible for the Clean Unit designation if the BACT determination resulted in no requirement to reduce emissions below the level of a standard, uncontrolled, new emissions unit of the same type. ( b) The owner or operator made an investment to install the control technology. For the purpose of this determination, an investment includes expenses to research the application of a pollution prevention technique to the emissions unit or expenses to apply a pollution prevention technique to an emissions unit. ( iii) Re qualifying for the Clean Unit designation. The emissions unit must obtain a new major NSR permit that requires compliance with the currentday BACT ( or LAER), and the emissions unit must meet the requirements in paragraphs ( x)( 3)( i) and ( x)( 3)( ii) of this section. ( 4) Effective date of the Clean Unit designation. The effective date of an emissions unit's Clean Unit designation ( that is, the date on which the owner or operator may begin to use the Clean Unit Test to determine whether a project at the emissions unit is a major modification) is determined according to the applicable paragraph ( x)( 4)( i) or ( x)( 4)( ii) of this section. ( i) Original Clean Unit designation, and emissions units that re qualify as Clean Units by implementing new control technology to meet current day BACT. The effective date is the date the emissions unit's air pollution control technology is placed into service, or 3 years after the issuance date of the major NSR permit, whichever is earlier, but no sooner than March 3, 2003, that is the date these provisions become effective. ( ii) Emissions units that re qualify for the Clean Unit designation using an existing control technology. The effective date is the date the new, major NSR permit is issued. ( 5) Clean Unit expiration. An emissions unit's Clean Unit designation expires ( that is, the date on which the owner or operator may no longer use the Clean Unit Test to determine whether a project affecting the emissions unit is, or is part of, a major modification) according to the applicable paragraph ( x)( 5)( i) or ( ii) of this section. ( i) Original Clean Unit designation, and emissions units that re qualify by implementing new control technology to meet current day BACT. For any emissions unit that automatically qualifies as a Clean Unit under paragraphs ( x)( 3)( i) and ( ii) of this section or re qualifies by implementing new control technology to meet currentday BACT under paragraph ( x)( 3)( iii) of this section, the Clean Unit designation expires 10 years after the effective date, or the date the equipment went into service, whichever is earlier; or, it expires at any time the owner or operator fails to comply with the provisions for maintaining the Clean Unit designation in paragraph ( x)( 7) of this section. ( ii) Emissions units that re qualify for the Clean Unit designation using an existing control technology. For any emissions unit that re qualifies as a Clean Unit under paragraph ( x)( 3)( iii) of this section using an existing control technology, the Clean Unit designation expires 10 years after the effective date; or, it expires any time the owner or operator fails to comply with the provisions for maintaining the Clean Unit designation in paragraph ( x)( 7) of this section. ( 6) Required title V permit content for a Clean Unit. After the effective date of the Clean Unit designation, and in accordance with the provisions of the applicable title V permit program under part 70 or part 71 of this chapter, but no later than when the title V permit is renewed, the title V permit for the major stationary source must include the following terms and conditions in paragraphs ( x)( 6)( i) through ( vi) of this section related to the Clean Unit. ( i) A statement indicating that the emissions unit qualifies as a Clean Unit and identifying the pollutant( s) for which this designation applies. ( ii) The effective date of the Clean Unit designation. If this date is not known when the Clean Unit designation is initially recorded in the title V permit ( e. g., because the air pollution control technology is not yet in service), the permit must describe the event that will determine the effective date ( e. g., the date the control technology is placed into service). Once the effective date is determined, the owner or operator must notify the Administrator of the exact date. This specific effective date must be added to the source's title V permit at the first opportunity, such as a modification, revision, reopening, or renewal of the title V permit for any reason, whichever comes first, but in no case later than the next renewal. ( iii) The expiration date of the Clean Unit designation. If this date is not known when the Clean Unit designation is initially recorded into the title V permit ( e. g., because the air pollution control technology is not yet in service), then the permit must describe the event that will determine the expiration date ( e. g., the date the control technology is placed into service). Once the expiration date is determined, the owner or operator must notify the Administrator of the exact date. The expiration date must be added to the source's title V permit at the first opportunity, such as a modification, revision, reopening, or renewal of the title V permit for any reason, whichever comes first, but in no case later than the next renewal. ( iv) All emission limitations and work practice requirements adopted in conjunction with BACT, and any physical or operational characteristics which formed the basis for the BACT determination ( e. g., possibly the emissions unit's capacity or throughput). ( v) Monitoring, recordkeeping, and reporting requirements as necessary to demonstrate that the emissions unit continues to meet the criteria for maintaining the Clean Unit designation. ( See paragraph ( x)( 7) of this section.) ( vi) Terms reflecting the owner or operator's duties to maintain the Clean Unit designation and the consequences of failing to do so, as presented in paragraph ( x)( 7) of this section. ( 7) Maintaining the Clean Unit designation. To maintain the Clean Unit VerDate Dec< 13> 2002 09: 09 Dec 30, 2002 Jkt 200001 PO 00000 Frm 00096 Fmt 4701 Sfmt 4700 E:\ FR\ FM\ 31DER3. SGM 31DER3 80281 Federal Register / Vol. 67, No. 251 / Tuesday, December 31, 2002 / Rules and Regulations designation, the owner or operator must conform to all the restrictions listed in paragraphs ( x)( 7)( i) through ( iii) of this section. This paragraph ( x)( 7) applies independently to each pollutant for which the emissions unit has the Clean Unit designation. That is, failing to conform to the restrictions for one pollutant affects the Clean Unit designation only for that pollutant. ( i) The Clean Unit must comply with the emission limitation( s) and/ or work practice requirements adopted in conjunction with the BACT that is recorded in the major NSR permit, and subsequently reflected in the title V permit. The owner or operator may not make a physical change in or change in the method of operation of the Clean Unit that causes the emissions unit to function in a manner that is inconsistent with the physical or operational characteristics that formed the basis for the BACT determination ( e. g., possibly the emissions unit's capacity or throughput). ( ii) The Clean Unit must comply with any terms and conditions in the title V permit related to the unit's Clean Unit designation. ( iii) The Clean Unit must continue to control emissions using the specific air pollution control technology that was the basis for its Clean Unit designation. If the emissions unit or control technology is replaced, then the Clean Unit designation ends. ( 8) Netting at Clean Units. Emissions changes that occur at a Clean Unit must not be included in calculating a significant net emissions increase ( that is, must not be used in a `` netting analysis''), unless such use occurs before the effective date of the Clean Unit designation, or after the Clean Unit designation expires; or, unless the emissions unit reduces emissions below the level that qualified the unit as a Clean Unit. However, if the Clean Unit reduces emissions below the level that qualified the unit as a Clean Unit, then the owner or operator may generate a credit for the difference between the level that qualified the unit as a Clean Unit and the new emissions limit if such reductions are surplus, quantifiable, and permanent. For purposes of generating offsets, the reductions must also be federally enforceable. For purposes of determining creditable net emissions increases and decreases, the reductions must also be enforceable as a practical matter. ( 9) Effect of redesignation on the Clean Unit designation. The Clean Unit designation of an emissions unit is not affected by re designation of the attainment status of the area in which it is located. That is, if a Clean Unit is located in an attainment area and the area is redesignated to nonattainment, its Clean Unit designation is not affected. Similarly, redesignation from nonattainment to attainment does not affect the Clean Unit designation. However, if an existing Clean Unit designation expires, it must re qualify under the requirements that are currently applicable in the area. ( y) Clean Unit provisions for emissions units that achieve an emission limitation comparable to BACT. An owner or operator of a major stationary source has the option of using the Clean Unit Test to determine whether emissions increases at a Clean Unit are part of a project that is a major modification according to the provisions in paragraphs ( y)( 1) through ( 11) of this section. ( 1) Applicability. The provisions of this paragraph ( y) apply to emissions units which do not qualify as Clean Units under paragraph ( x) of this section, but which are achieving a level of emissions control comparable to BACT, as determined by the Administrator in accordance with this paragraph ( y). ( 2) General provisions for Clean Units. The provisions in paragraphs ( y)( 2)( i) through ( iv) of this section apply to a Clean Unit ( designated under this paragraph ( y)). ( i) Any project for which the owner or operator begins actual construction after the effective date of the Clean Unit designation ( as determined in accordance with paragraph ( y)( 5) of this section) and before the expiration date ( as determined in accordance with paragraph ( y)( 6) of this section) will be considered to have occurred while the emissions unit was a Clean Unit. ( ii) If a project at a Clean Unit does not cause the need for a change in the emission limitations or work practice requirements in the permit for the unit that have been determined ( pursuant to paragraph ( y)( 4) of this section) to be comparable to BACT, and the project would not alter any physical or operational characteristics that formed the basis for determining that the emissions unit's control technology achieves a level of emissions control comparable to BACT as specified in paragraph ( y)( 8)( iv) of this section, the emissions unit remains a Clean Unit. ( iii) If a project causes the need for a change in the emission limitations or work practice requirements in the permit for the unit that have been determined ( pursuant to paragraph ( y)( 4) of this section) to be comparable to BACT, or the project would alter any physical or operational characteristics that formed the basis for determining that the emissions unit's control technology achieves a level of emissions control comparable to BACT as specified in paragraph ( y)( 8)( iv) of this section, then the emissions unit loses its designation as a Clean Unit upon issuance of the necessary permit revisions ( unless the unit re qualifies as a Clean Unit pursuant to paragraph ( u)( 3)( iv) of this section). If the owner or operator begins actual construction on the project without first applying to revise the emissions unit's permit, the Clean Unit designation ends immediately prior to the time when actual construction begins. ( iv) A project that causes an emissions unit to lose its designation as a Clean Unit is subject to the applicability requirements of paragraphs ( a)( 2)( iv)( a) through ( d) and paragraph ( a)( 2)( iv)( f) of this section as if the emissions unit is not a Clean Unit. ( 3) Qualifying or re qualifying to use the Clean Unit applicability test. An emissions unit qualifies as a Clean Unit when the unit meets the criteria in paragraphs ( y)( 3)( i) through ( iii) of this section. After the original Clean Unit designation expires in accordance with paragraph ( y)( 6) of this section or is lost pursuant to paragraph ( y)( 2)( iii) of this section, such emissions unit may requalify as a Clean Unit under either paragraph ( y)( 3)( iv) of this section, or under the Clean Unit provisions in paragraph ( x) of this section. To requalify as a Clean Unit under paragraph ( y)( 3)( iv) of this section, the emissions unit must obtain a new permit issued pursuant to the requirements in paragraphs ( y)( 7) and ( 8) of this section and meet all the criteria in paragraph ( y)( 3)( iv) of this section. The Administrator will make a separate Clean Unit designation for each pollutant emitted by the emissions unit for which the emissions unit qualifies as a Clean Unit. ( i) Qualifying air pollution control technologies. Air pollutant emissions from the emissions unit must be reduced through the use of air pollution control technology ( which includes pollution prevention as defined under paragraph ( b)( 39) of this section or work practices) that meets both the following requirements in paragraphs ( y)( 3)( i)( a) and ( b) of this section. ( a) The owner or operator has demonstrated that the emissions unit's control technology is comparable to BACT according to the requirements of paragraph ( y)( 4) of this section. However, the emissions unit is not eligible for a Clean Unit designation if its emissions are not reduced below the level of a standard, uncontrolled VerDate Dec< 13> 2002 09: 09 Dec 30, 2002 Jkt 200001 PO 00000 Frm 00097 Fmt 4701 Sfmt 4700 E:\ FR\ FM\ 31DER3. SGM 31DER3 80282 Federal Register / Vol. 67, No. 251 / Tuesday, December 31, 2002 / Rules and Regulations emissions unit of the same type ( e. g., if the BACT determinations to which it is compared have resulted in a determination that no control measures are required). ( b) The owner or operator made an investment to install the control technology. For the purpose of this determination, an investment includes expenses to research the application of a pollution prevention technique to the emissions unit or to retool the unit to apply a pollution prevention technique. ( ii) Impact of emissions from the unit. The Administrator must determine that the allowable emissions from the emissions unit will not cause or contribute to a violation of any national ambient air quality standard or PSD increment, or adversely impact an air quality related value ( such as visibility) that has been identified for a Federal Class I area by a Federal Land Manager and for which information is available to the general public. ( iii) Date of installation. An emissions unit may qualify as a Clean Unit even if the control technology, on which the Clean Unit designation is based, was installed before March 3, 2003. However, for such emissions units, the owner or operator must apply for the Clean Unit designation before December 31, 2004. For technologies installed on and after March 3, 2003, the owner or operator must apply for the Clean Unit designation at the time the control technology is installed. ( iv) Re qualifying as a Clean Unit. The emissions unit must obtain a new permit ( pursuant to requirements in paragraphs ( y)( 7) and ( 8) of this section) that demonstrates that the emissions unit's control technology is achieving a level of emission control comparable to current day BACT, and the emissions unit must meet the requirements in paragraphs ( y)( 3)( i)( a) and ( y)( 3)( ii) of this section. ( 4) Demonstrating control effectiveness comparable to BACT. The owner or operator may demonstrate that the emissions unit's control technology is comparable to BACT for purposes of paragraph ( y)( 3)( i) of this section according to either paragraph ( y)( 4)( i) or ( ii) of this section. Paragraph ( y)( 4)( iii) of this section specifies the time for making this comparison. ( i) Comparison to previous BACT and LAER determinations. The Administrator maintains an on line data base of previous determinations of RACT, BACT, and LAER in the RACT/ BACT/ LAER Clearinghouse ( RBLC). The emissions unit's control technology is presumed to be comparable to BACT if it achieves an emission limitation that is equal to or better than the average of the emission limitations achieved by all the sources for which a BACT or LAER determination has been made within the preceding 5 years and entered into the RBLC, and for which it is technically feasible to apply the BACT or LAER control technology to the emissions unit. The Administrator shall also compare this presumption to any additional BACT or LAER determinations of which he or she is aware, and shall consider any information on achieved in practice pollution control technologies provided during the public comment period, to determine whether any presumptive determination that the control technology is comparable to BACT is correct. ( ii) The substantially as effective test. The owner or operator may demonstrate that the emissions unit's control technology is substantially as effective as BACT. In addition, any other person may present evidence related to whether the control technology is substantially as effective as BACT during the public participation process required under paragraph ( y)( 7) of this section. The Administrator shall consider such evidence on a case by case basis and determine whether the emissions unit's air pollution control technology is substantially as effective as BACT. ( iii) Time of comparison. ( a) Emissions units with control technologies that are installed before March 3, 2003. The owner or operator of an emissions unit whose control technology is installed before March 3, 2003 may, at its option, either demonstrate that the emission limitation achieved by the emissions unit's control technology is comparable to the BACT requirements that applied at the time the control technology was installed, or demonstrate that the emission limitation achieved by the emissions unit's control technology is comparable to current day BACT requirements. The expiration date of the Clean Unit designation will depend on which option the owner or operator uses, as specified in paragraph ( y)( 6) of this section. ( b) Emissions units with control technologies that are installed on and after March 3, 2003. The owner or operator must demonstrate that the emission limitation achieved by the emissions unit's control technology is comparable to current day BACT requirements. ( 5) Effective date of the Clean Unit designation. The effective date of an emissions unit's Clean Unit designation ( that is, the date on which the owner or operator may begin to use the Clean Unit Test to determine whether a project involving the emissions unit is a major modification) is the date that the permit required by paragraph ( y)( 7) of this section is issued or the date that the emissions unit's air pollution control technology is placed into service, whichever is later. ( 6) Clean Unit expiration. If the owner or operator demonstrates that the emission limitation achieved by the emissions unit's control technology is comparable to the BACT requirements that applied at the time the control technology was installed, then the Clean Unit designation expires 10 years from the date that the control technology was installed. For all other emissions units, the Clean Unit designation expires 10 years from the effective date of the Clean Unit designation, as determined according to paragraph ( y)( 5) of this section. In addition, for all emissions units, the Clean Unit designation expires any time the owner or operator fails to comply with the provisions for maintaining the Clean Unit designation in paragraph ( y)( 9) of this section. ( 7) Procedures for designating emissions units as Clean Units. The Administrator shall designate an emissions unit a Clean Unit only by issuing a permit through a permitting program that has been approved by the Administrator and that conforms with the requirements of § § 51.160 through 51.164 of this chapter including requirements for public notice of the proposed Clean Unit designation and opportunity for public comment. Such permit must also meet the requirements in paragraph ( y)( 8) of this section. ( 8) Required permit content. The permit required by paragraph ( y)( 7) of this section shall include the terms and conditions set forth in paragraphs ( y)( 8)( i) through ( vi) of this section. Such terms and conditions shall be incorporated into the major stationary source's title V permit in accordance with the provisions of the applicable title V permit program under part 70 or part 71 of this chapter, but no later than when the title V permit is renewed. ( i) A statement indicating that the emissions unit qualifies as a Clean Unit and identifying the pollutant( s) for which this designation applies. ( ii) The effective date of the Clean Unit designation. If this date is not known when the Administrator issues the permit ( e. g., because the air pollution control technology is not yet in service), then the permit must describe the event that will determine the effective date ( e. g., the date the control technology is placed into service). Once the effective date is known, then the owner or operator must notify the Administrator of the exact date. This specific effective date must be VerDate Dec< 13> 2002 09: 09 Dec 30, 2002 Jkt 200001 PO 00000 Frm 00098 Fmt 4701 Sfmt 4700 E:\ FR\ FM\ 31DER3. SGM 31DER3 80283 Federal Register / Vol. 67, No. 251 / Tuesday, December 31, 2002 / Rules and Regulations added to the source's title V permit at the first opportunity, such as a modification, revision, reopening, or renewal of the title V permit for any reason, whichever comes first, but in no case later than the next renewal. ( iii) The expiration date of the Clean Unit designation. If this date is not known when the Administrator issues the permit ( e. g., because the air pollution control technology is not yet in service), then the permit must describe the event that will determine the expiration date ( e. g., the date the control technology is placed into service). Once the expiration date is known, then the owner or operator must notify the Administrator of the exact date. The expiration date must be added to the source's title V permit at the first opportunity, such as a modification, revision, reopening, or renewal of the title V permit for any reason, whichever comes first, but in no case later than the next renewal. ( iv) All emission limitations and work practice requirements adopted in conjunction with emission limitations necessary to assure that the control technology continues to achieve an emission limitation comparable to BACT, and any physical or operational characteristics that formed the basis for determining that the emissions unit's control technology achieves a level of emissions control comparable to BACT ( e. g., possibly the emissions unit's capacity or throughput). ( v) Monitoring, recordkeeping, and reporting requirements as necessary to demonstrate that the emissions unit continues to meet the criteria for maintaining its Clean Unit designation. ( See paragraph ( y)( 9) of this section.) ( vi) Terms reflecting the owner or operator's duties to maintain the Clean Unit designation and the consequences of failing to do so, as presented in paragraph ( y)( 9) of this section. ( 9) Maintaining a Clean Unit designation. To maintain the Clean Unit designation, the owner or operator must conform to all the restrictions listed in paragraphs ( y)( 9)( i) through ( v) of this section. This paragraph ( y)( 9) applies independently to each pollutant for which the Administrator has designated the emissions unit a Clean Unit. That is, failing to conform to the restrictions for one pollutant affects the Clean Unit designation only for that pollutant. ( i) The Clean Unit must comply with the emission limitation( s) and/ or work practice requirements adopted to ensure that the control technology continues to achieve emission control comparable to BACT. ( ii) The owner or operator may not make a physical change in or change in the method of operation of the Clean Unit that causes the emissions unit to function in a manner that is inconsistent with the physical or operational characteristics that formed the basis for the determination that the control technology is achieving a level of emission control that is comparable to BACT ( e. g., possibly the emissions unit's capacity or throughput). ( iii) [ Reserved] ( iv) The Clean Unit must comply with any terms and conditions in the title V permit related to the unit's Clean Unit designation. ( v) The Clean Unit must continue to control emissions using the specific air pollution control technology that was the basis for its Clean Unit designation. If the emissions unit or control technology is replaced, then the Clean Unit designation ends. ( 10) Netting at Clean Units. Emissions changes that occur at a Clean Unit must not be included in calculating a significant net emissions increase ( that is, must not be used in a `` netting analysis'') unless such use occurs before March 3, 2003 or after the Clean Unit designation expires; or, unless the emissions unit reduces emissions below the level that qualified the unit as a Clean Unit. However, if the Clean Unit reduces emissions below the level that qualified the unit as a Clean Unit, then the owner or operator may generate a credit for the difference between the level that qualified the unit as a Clean Unit and the emissions unit's new emissions limit if such reductions are surplus, quantifiable, and permanent. For purposes of generating offsets, the reductions must also be federally enforceable. For purposes of determining creditable net emissions increases and decreases, the reductions must also be enforceable as a practical matter. ( 11) Effect of redesignation on a Clean Unit designation. The Clean Unit designation of an emissions unit is not affected by redesignation of the attainment status of the area in which it is located. That is, if a Clean Unit is located in an attainment area and the area is redesignated to nonattainment, its Clean Unit designation is not affected. Similarly, redesignation from nonattainment to attainment does not affect the Clean Unit designation. However, if a Clean Unit's designation expires or is lost pursuant to paragraphs ( x)( 2)( iii) and ( y)( 2)( iii) of this section, it must re qualify under the requirements that are currently applicable. ( z) PCP exclusion procedural requirements. PCPs shall be provided according to the provisions in paragraphs ( z)( 1) through ( 6) of this section. ( 1) Before an owner or operator begins actual construction of a PCP, the owner or operator must either submit a notice to the Administrator if the project is listed in paragraphs ( b)( 32)( i) through ( vi) of this section, or if the project is not listed in paragraphs ( b)( 32)( i) through ( vi) of this section, then the owner or operator must submit a permit application and obtain approval to use the PCP exclusion from the Administrator consistent with the requirements in paragraph ( z)( 5) of this section. Regardless of whether the owner or operator submits a notice or a permit application, the project must meet the requirements in paragraph ( z)( 2) of this section, and the notice or permit application must contain the information required in paragraph ( z)( 3) of this section. ( 2) Any project that relies on the PCP exclusion must meet the requirements of paragraphs ( z)( 2)( i) and ( ii) of this section. ( i) Environmentally beneficial analysis. The environmental benefit from the emissions reductions of pollutants regulated under the Act must outweigh the environmental detriment of emissions increases in pollutants regulated under the Act. A statement that a technology from paragraphs ( b)( 32)( i) through ( vi) of this section is being used shall be presumed to satisfy this requirement. ( ii) Air quality analysis. The emissions increases from the project will not cause or contribute to a violation of any national ambient air quality standard or PSD increment, or adversely impact an air quality related value ( such as visibility) that has been identified for a Federal Class I area by a Federal Land Manager and for which information is available to the general public. ( 3) Content of notice or permit application. In the notice or permit application sent to the Administrator, the owner or operator must include, at a minimum, the information listed in paragraphs ( z)( 3)( i) through ( v) of this section. ( i) A description of the project. ( ii) The potential emissions increases and decreases of any pollutant regulated under the Act and the projected emissions increases and decreases using the methodology in paragraph ( a)( 2)( iv) of this section, that will result from the project, and a copy of the environmentally beneficial analysis required by paragraph ( z)( 2)( i) of this section. ( iii) A description of monitoring and recordkeeping, and all other methods, to VerDate Dec< 13> 2002 09: 09 Dec 30, 2002 Jkt 200001 PO 00000 Frm 00099 Fmt 4701 Sfmt 4700 E:\ FR\ FM\ 31DER3. SGM 31DER3 80284 Federal Register / Vol. 67, No. 251 / Tuesday, December 31, 2002 / Rules and Regulations be used on an ongoing basis to demonstrate that the project is environmentally beneficial. Methods should be sufficient to meet the requirements in part 70 and part 71 of this chapter. ( iv) A certification that the project will be designed and operated in a manner that is consistent with proper industry and engineering practices, in a manner that is consistent with the environmentally beneficial analysis and air quality analysis required by paragraphs ( z)( 2)( i) and ( ii) of this section, with information submitted in the notice or permit application, and in such a way as to minimize, within the physical configuration and operational standards usually associated with the emissions control device or strategy, emissions of collateral pollutants. ( v) Demonstration that the PCP will not have an adverse air quality impact ( e. g., modeling, screening level modeling results, or a statement that the collateral emissions increase is included within the parameters used in the most recent modeling exercise) as required by paragraph ( z)( 2)( ii) of this section. An air quality impact analysis is not required for any pollutant that will not experience a significant emissions increase as a result of the project. ( 4) Notice process for listed projects. For projects listed in paragraphs ( b)( 32)( i) through ( vi) of this section, the owner or operator may begin actual construction of the project immediately after notice is sent to the Administrator ( unless otherwise prohibited under requirements of the applicable State Implementation Plan). The owner or operator shall respond to any requests by the Administrator for additional information that the Administrator determines is necessary to evaluate the suitability of the project for the PCP exclusion. ( 5) Permit process for unlisted projects. Before an owner or operator may begin actual construction of a PCP project that is not listed in paragraphs ( b)( 32)( i) through ( vi) of this section, the project must be approved by the Administrator and recorded in a State Implementation Plan approved permit or title V permit using procedures that are consistent with § § 51.160 and 51.161 of this chapter. This includes the requirement that the Administrator provide the public with notice of the proposed approval, with access to the environmentally beneficial analysis and the air quality analysis, and provide at least a 30 day period for the public and the Administrator to submit comments. The Administrator must address all material comments received by the end of the comment period before taking final action on the permit. ( 6) Operational requirements. Upon installation of the PCP, the owner or operator must comply with the requirements of paragraphs ( z)( 6)( i) through ( iv) of this section. ( i) General duty. The owner or operator must operate the PCP in a manner consistent with proper industry and engineering practices, in a manner that is consistent with the environmentally beneficial analysis and air quality analysis required by paragraphs ( z)( 2)( i) and ( ii) of this section, with information submitted in the notice or permit application required by paragraph ( z)( 3) of this section, and in such a way as to minimize, within the physical configuration and operational standards usually associated with the emissions control device or strategy, emissions of collateral pollutants. ( ii) Recordkeeping. The owner or operator must maintain copies on site of the environmentally beneficial analysis, the air quality impacts analysis, and monitoring and other emission records to prove that the PCP operated consistent with the general duty requirements in paragraph ( z)( 6)( i) of this section. ( iii) Permit requirements. The owner or operator must comply with any provisions in the State Implementation Plan approved permit or title V permit related to use and approval of the PCP exclusion. ( iv) Generation of emission reduction credits. Emission reductions created by a PCP shall not be included in calculating a significant net emissions increase unless the emissions unit further reduces emissions after qualifying for the PCP exclusion ( e. g., taking an operational restriction on the hours of operation). The owner or operator may generate a credit for the difference between the level of reduction which was used to qualify for the PCP exclusion and the new emissions limit if such reductions are surplus, quantifiable, and permanent. For purposes of generating offsets, the reductions must also be federally enforceable. For purposes of determining creditable net emissions increases and decreases, the reductions must also be enforceable as a practical matter. ( aa) Actuals PALs. The provisions in paragraphs ( aa)( 1) through ( 15) of this section govern actuals PALs. ( 1) Applicability. ( i) The Administrator may approve the use of an actuals PAL for any existing major stationary source if the PAL meets the requirements in paragraphs ( aa)( 1) through ( 15) of this section. The term `` PAL'' shall mean `` actuals PAL'' throughout paragraph ( aa) of this section. ( ii) Any physical change in or change in the method of operation of a major stationary source that maintains its total source wide emissions below the PAL level, meets the requirements in paragraphs ( aa)( 1) through ( 15) of this section, and complies with the PAL permit: ( a) Is not a major modification for the PAL pollutant; ( b) Does not have to be approved through the PSD program; and ( c) Is not subject to the provisions in paragraph ( r)( 4) of this section ( restrictions on relaxing enforceable emission limitations that the major stationary source used to avoid applicability of the major NSR program). ( iii) Except as provided under paragraph ( aa)( 1)( ii)( c) of this section, a major stationary source shall continue to comply with all applicable Federal or State requirements, emission limitations, and work practice requirements that were established prior to the effective date of the PAL. ( 2) Definitions. For the purposes of this section, the definitions in paragraphs ( aa)( 2)( i) through ( xi) of this section apply. When a term is not defined in these paragraphs, it shall have the meaning given in paragraph ( b) of this section or in the Act. ( i) Actuals PAL for a major stationary source means a PAL based on the baseline actual emissions ( as defined in paragraph ( b)( 48) of this section) of all emissions units ( as defined in paragraph ( b)( 7) of this section) at the source, that emit or have the potential to emit the PAL pollutant. ( ii) Allowable emissions means `` allowable emissions'' as defined in paragraph ( b)( 16) of this section, except as this definition is modified according to paragraphs ( aa)( 2)( ii)( a) and ( b) of this section. ( a) The allowable emissions for any emissions unit shall be calculated considering any emission limitations that are enforceable as a practical matter on the emissions unit's potential to emit. ( b) An emissions unit's potential to emit shall be determined using the definition in paragraph ( b)( 4) of this section, except that the words `` or enforceable as a practical matter'' should be added after `` federally enforceable.'' ( iii) Small emissions unit means an emissions unit that emits or has the potential to emit the PAL pollutant in an amount less than the significant level for that PAL pollutant, as defined in VerDate Dec< 13> 2002 09: 09 Dec 30, 2002 Jkt 200001 PO 00000 Frm 00100 Fmt 4701 Sfmt 4700 E:\ FR\ FM\ 31DER3. SGM 31DER3 80285 Federal Register / Vol. 67, No. 251 / Tuesday, December 31, 2002 / Rules and Regulations paragraph ( b)( 23) of this section or in the Act, whichever is lower. ( iv) Major emissions unit means: ( a) Any emissions unit that emits or has the potential to emit 100 tons per year or more of the PAL pollutant in an attainment area; or ( b) Any emissions unit that emits or has the potential to emit the PAL pollutant in an amount that is equal to or greater than the major source threshold for the PAL pollutant as defined by the Act for nonattainment areas. For example, in accordance with the definition of major stationary source in section 182( c) of the Act, an emissions unit would be a major emissions unit for VOC if the emissions unit is located in a serious ozone nonattainment area and it emits or has the potential to emit 50 or more tons of VOC per year. ( v) Plantwide applicability limitation ( PAL) means an emission limitation expressed in tons per year, for a pollutant at a major stationary source, that is enforceable as a practical matter and established source wide in accordance with paragraphs ( aa)( 1) through ( 15) of this section. ( vi) PAL effective date generally means the date of issuance of the PAL permit. However, the PAL effective date for an increased PAL is the date any emissions unit that is part of the PAL major modification becomes operational and begins to emit the PAL pollutant. ( vii) PAL effective period means the period beginning with the PAL effective date and ending 10 years later. ( viii) PAL major modification means, notwithstanding paragraphs ( b)( 2) and ( b)( 3) of this section ( the definitions for major modification and net emissions increase), any physical change in or change in the method of operation of the PAL source that causes it to emit the PAL pollutant at a level equal to or greater than the PAL. ( ix) PAL permit means the major NSR permit, the minor NSR permit, or the State operating permit under a program that is approved into the State Implementation Plan, or the title V permit issued by the Administrator that establishes a PAL for a major stationary source. ( x) PAL pollutant means the pollutant for which a PAL is established at a major stationary source. ( xi) Significant emissions unit means an emissions unit that emits or has the potential to emit a PAL pollutant in an amount that is equal to or greater than the significant level ( as defined in paragraph ( b)( 23) of this section or in the Act, whichever is lower) for that PAL pollutant, but less than the amount that would qualify the unit as a major emissions unit as defined in paragraph ( aa)( 2)( iv) of this section. ( 3) Permit application requirements. As part of a permit application requesting a PAL, the owner or operator of a major stationary source shall submit the following information to the Administrator for approval: ( i) A list of all emissions units at the source designated as small, significant or major based on their potential to emit. In addition, the owner or operator of the source shall indicate which, if any, Federal or State applicable requirements, emission limitations, or work practices apply to each unit. ( ii) Calculations of the baseline actual emissions ( with supporting documentation). Baseline actual emissions are to include emissions associated not only with operation of the unit, but also emissions associated with startup, shutdown, and malfunction. ( iii) The calculation procedures that the major stationary source owner or operator proposes to use to convert the monitoring system data to monthly emissions and annual emissions based on a 12 month rolling total for each month as required by paragraph ( aa)( 13)( i) of this section. ( 4) General requirements for establishing PALs. ( i) The Administrator is allowed to establish a PAL at a major stationary source, provided that at a minimum, the requirements in paragraphs ( aa)( 4)( i)( a) through ( g) of this section are met. ( a) The PAL shall impose an annual emission limitation in tons per year, that is enforceable as a practical matter, for the entire major stationary source. For each month during the PAL effective period after the first 12 months of establishing a PAL, the major stationary source owner or operator shall show that the sum of the monthly emissions from each emissions unit under the PAL for the previous 12 consecutive months is less than the PAL ( a 12 month average, rolled monthly). For each month during the first 11 months from the PAL effective date, the major stationary source owner or operator shall show that the sum of the preceding monthly emissions from the PAL effective date for each emissions unit under the PAL is less than the PAL. ( b) The PAL shall be established in a PAL permit that meets the public participation requirements in paragraph ( aa)( 5) of this section. ( c) The PAL permit shall contain all the requirements of paragraph ( aa)( 7) of this section. ( d) The PAL shall include fugitive emissions, to the extent quantifiable, from all emissions units that emit or have the potential to emit the PAL pollutant at the major stationary source. ( e) Each PAL shall regulate emissions of only one pollutant. ( f) Each PAL shall have a PAL effective period of 10 years. ( g) The owner or operator of the major stationary source with a PAL shall comply with the monitoring, recordkeeping, and reporting requirements provided in paragraphs ( aa)( 12) through ( 14) of this section for each emissions unit under the PAL through the PAL effective period. ( ii) At no time ( during or after the PAL effective period) are emissions reductions of a PAL pollutant that occur during the PAL effective period creditable as decreases for purposes of offsets under § 51.165( a)( 3)( ii) of this chapter unless the level of the PAL is reduced by the amount of such emissions reductions and such reductions would be creditable in the absence of the PAL. ( 5) Public participation requirements for PALs. PALs for existing major stationary sources shall be established, renewed, or increased through a procedure that is consistent with § § 51.160 and 51.161 of this chapter. This includes the requirement that the Administrator provide the public with notice of the proposed approval of a PAL permit and at least a 30 day period for submittal of public comment. The Administrator must address all material comments before taking final action on the permit. ( 6) Setting the 10 year actuals PAL level. The actuals PAL level for a major stationary source shall be established as the sum of the baseline actual emissions ( as defined in paragraph ( b)( 48) of this section) of the PAL pollutant for each emissions unit at the source; plus an amount equal to the applicable significant level for the PAL pollutant under paragraph ( b)( 23) of this section or under the Act, whichever is lower. When establishing the actuals PAL level, for a PAL pollutant, only one consecutive 24 month period must be used to determine the baseline actual emissions for all existing emissions units. However, a different consecutive 24 month period may be used for each different PAL pollutant. Emissions associated with units that were permanently shutdown after this 24 month period must be subtracted from the PAL level. Emissions from units on which actual construction began after the 24 month period must be added to the PAL level in an amount equal to the potential to emit of the units. The Administrator shall specify a reduced PAL level( s) ( in tons/ yr) in the PAL permit to become effective on the future VerDate Dec< 13> 2002 09: 09 Dec 30, 2002 Jkt 200001 PO 00000 Frm 00101 Fmt 4701 Sfmt 4700 E:\ FR\ FM\ 31DER3. SGM 31DER3 80286 Federal Register / Vol. 67, No. 251 / Tuesday, December 31, 2002 / Rules and Regulations compliance date( s) of any applicable Federal or State regulatory requirement( s) that the Administrator is aware of prior to issuance of the PAL permit. For instance, if the source owner or operator will be required to reduce emissions from industrial boilers in half from baseline emissions of 60 ppm NOX to a new rule limit of 30 ppm, then the permit shall contain a future effective PAL level that is equal to the current PAL level reduced by half of the original baseline emissions of such unit( s). ( 7) Contents of the PAL permit. The PAL permit must contain, at a minimum, the information in paragraphs ( aa)( 7)( i) through ( x) of this section. ( i) The PAL pollutant and the applicable source wide emission limitation in tons per year. ( ii) The PAL permit effective date and the expiration date of the PAL ( PAL effective period). ( iii) Specification in the PAL permit that if a major stationary source owner or operator applies to renew a PAL in accordance with paragraph ( aa)( 10) of this section before the end of the PAL effective period, then the PAL shall not expire at the end of the PAL effective period. It shall remain in effect until a revised PAL permit is issued by a reviewing authority. ( iv) A requirement that emission calculations for compliance purposes must include emissions from startups, shutdowns, and malfunctions. ( v) A requirement that, once the PAL expires, the major stationary source is subject to the requirements of paragraph ( aa)( 9) of this section. ( vi) The calculation procedures that the major stationary source owner or operator shall use to convert the monitoring system data to monthly emissions and annual emissions based on a 12 month rolling total as required by paragraph ( aa)( 13)( i) of this section. ( vii) A requirement that the major stationary source owner or operator monitor all emissions units in accordance with the provisions under paragraph ( aa)( 12) of this section. ( viii) A requirement to retain the records required under paragraph ( aa)( 13) of this section on site. Such records may be retained in an electronic format. ( ix) A requirement to submit the reports required under paragraph ( aa)( 14) of this section by the required deadlines. ( x) Any other requirements that the Administrator deems necessary to implement and enforce the PAL. ( 8) PAL effective period and reopening of the PAL permit. The requirements in paragraphs ( aa)( 8)( i) and ( ii) of this section apply to actuals PALs. ( i) PAL effective period. The Administrator shall specify a PAL effective period of 10 years. ( ii) Reopening of the PAL permit. ( a) During the PAL effective period, the Administrator must reopen the PAL permit to: ( 1) Correct typographical/ calculation errors made in setting the PAL or reflect a more accurate determination of emissions used to establish the PAL; ( 2) Reduce the PAL if the owner or operator of the major stationary source creates creditable emissions reductions for use as offsets under § 51.165( a)( 3)( ii) of this chapter; and ( 3) Revise the PAL to reflect an increase in the PAL as provided under paragraph ( aa)( 11) of this section. ( b) The Administrator shall have discretion to reopen the PAL permit for the following: ( 1) Reduce the PAL to reflect newly applicable Federal requirements ( for example, NSPS) with compliance dates after the PAL effective date; ( 2) Reduce the PAL consistent with any other requirement, that is enforceable as a practical matter, and that the State may impose on the major stationary source under the State Implementation Plan; and ( 3) Reduce the PAL if the reviewing authority determines that a reduction is necessary to avoid causing or contributing to a NAAQS or PSD increment violation, or to an adverse impact on an air quality related value that has been identified for a Federal Class I area by a Federal Land Manager and for which information is available to the general public. ( c) Except for the permit reopening in paragraph ( aa)( 8)( ii)( a)( 1) of this section for the correction of typographical/ calculation errors that do not increase the PAL level, all other reopenings shall be carried out in accordance with the public participation requirements of paragraph ( aa)( 5) of this section. ( 9) Expiration of a PAL. Any PAL that is not renewed in accordance with the procedures in paragraph ( aa)( 10) of this section shall expire at the end of the PAL effective period, and the requirements in paragraphs ( aa)( 9)( i) through ( v) of this section shall apply. ( i) Each emissions unit ( or each group of emissions units) that existed under the PAL shall comply with an allowable emission limitation under a revised permit established according to the procedures in paragraphs ( aa)( 9)( i)( a) and ( b) of this section. ( a) Within the time frame specified for PAL renewals in paragraph ( aa)( 10)( ii) of this section, the major stationary source shall submit a proposed allowable emission limitation for each emissions unit ( or each group of emissions units, if such a distribution is more appropriate as decided by the Administrator) by distributing the PAL allowable emissions for the major stationary source among each of the emissions units that existed under the PAL. If the PAL had not yet been adjusted for an applicable requirement that became effective during the PAL effective period, as required under paragraph ( aa)( 10)( v) of this section, such distribution shall be made as if the PAL had been adjusted. ( b) The Administrator shall decide whether and how the PAL allowable emissions will be distributed and issue a revised permit incorporating allowable limits for each emissions unit, or each group of emissions units, as the Administrator determines is appropriate. ( ii) Each emissions unit( s) shall comply with the allowable emission limitation on a 12 month rolling basis. The Administrator may approve the use of monitoring systems ( source testing, emission factors, etc.) other than CEMS, CERMS, PEMS, or CPMS to demonstrate compliance with the allowable emission limitation. ( iii) Until the Administrator issues the revised permit incorporating allowable limits for each emissions unit, or each group of emissions units, as required under paragraph ( aa)( 9)( i)( b) of this section, the source shall continue to comply with a source wide, multi unit emissions cap equivalent to the level of the PAL emission limitation. ( iv) Any physical change or change in the method of operation at the major stationary source will be subject to major NSR requirements if such change meets the definition of major modification in paragraph ( b)( 2) of this section. ( v) The major stationary source owner or operator shall continue to comply with any State or Federal applicable requirements ( BACT, RACT, NSPS, etc.) that may have applied either during the PAL effective period or prior to the PAL effective period except for those emission limitations that had been established pursuant to paragraph ( r)( 4) of this section, but were eliminated by the PAL in accordance with the provisions in paragraph ( aa)( 1)( ii)( c) of this section. ( 10) Renewal of a PAL. ( i) The Administrator shall follow the procedures specified in paragraph ( aa)( 5) of this section in approving any request to renew a PAL for a major stationary source, and shall provide both the proposed PAL level and a VerDate Dec< 13> 2002 09: 09 Dec 30, 2002 Jkt 200001 PO 00000 Frm 00102 Fmt 4701 Sfmt 4700 E:\ FR\ FM\ 31DER3. SGM 31DER3 80287 Federal Register / Vol. 67, No. 251 / Tuesday, December 31, 2002 / Rules and Regulations written rationale for the proposed PAL level to the public for review and comment. During such public review, any person may propose a PAL level for the source for consideration by the Administrator. ( ii) Application deadline. A major stationary source owner or operator shall submit a timely application to the Administrator to request renewal of a PAL. A timely application is one that is submitted at least 6 months prior to, but not earlier than 18 months from, the date of permit expiration. This deadline for application submittal is to ensure that the permit will not expire before the permit is renewed. If the owner or operator of a major stationary source submits a complete application to renew the PAL within this time period, then the PAL shall continue to be effective until the revised permit with the renewed PAL is issued. ( iii) Application requirements. The application to renew a PAL permit shall contain the information required in paragraphs ( aa)( 10)( iii)( a) through ( d) of this section. ( a) The information required in paragraphs ( aa)( 3)( i) through ( iii) of this section. ( b) A proposed PAL level. ( c) The sum of the potential to emit of all emissions units under the PAL ( with supporting documentation). ( d) Any other information the owner or operator wishes the Administrator to consider in determining the appropriate level for renewing the PAL. ( iv) PAL adjustment. In determining whether and how to adjust the PAL, the Administrator shall consider the options outlined in paragraphs ( aa)( 10)( iv)( a) and ( b) of this section. However, in no case may any such adjustment fail to comply with paragraph ( aa)( 10)( iv)( c) of this section. ( a) If the emissions level calculated in accordance with paragraph ( aa)( 6) of this section is equal to or greater than 80 percent of the PAL level, the Administrator may renew the PAL at the same level without considering the factors set forth in paragraph ( aa)( 10)( iv)( b) of this section; or ( b) The Administrator may set the PAL at a level that he or she determines to be more representative of the source's baseline actual emissions, or that he or she determines to be more appropriate considering air quality needs, advances in control technology, anticipated economic growth in the area, desire to reward or encourage the source's voluntary emissions reductions, or other factors as specifically identified by the Administrator in his or her written rationale. ( c) Notwithstanding paragraphs ( aa)( 10)( iv)( a) and ( b) of this section: ( 1) If the potential to emit of the major stationary source is less than the PAL, the Administrator shall adjust the PAL to a level no greater than the potential to emit of the source; and ( 2) The Administrator shall not approve a renewed PAL level higher than the current PAL, unless the major stationary source has complied with the provisions of paragraph ( aa)( 11) of this section ( increasing a PAL). ( v) If the compliance date for a State or Federal requirement that applies to the PAL source occurs during the PAL effective period, and if the Administrator has not already adjusted for such requirement, the PAL shall be adjusted at the time of PAL permit renewal or title V permit renewal, whichever occurs first. ( 11) Increasing a PAL during the PAL effective period. ( i) The Administrator may increase a PAL emission limitation only if the major stationary source complies with the provisions in paragraphs ( aa)( 11)( i)( a) through ( d) of this section. ( a) The owner or operator of the major stationary source shall submit a complete application to request an increase in the PAL limit for a PAL major modification. Such application shall identify the emissions unit( s) contributing to the increase in emissions so as to cause the major stationary source's emissions to equal or exceed its PAL. ( b) As part of this application, the major stationary source owner or operator shall demonstrate that the sum of the baseline actual emissions of the small emissions units, plus the sum of the baseline actual emissions of the significant and major emissions units assuming application of BACT equivalent controls, plus the sum of the allowable emissions of the new or modified emissions unit( s) exceeds the PAL. The level of control that would result from BACT equivalent controls on each significant or major emissions unit shall be determined by conducting a new BACT analysis at the time the application is submitted, unless the emissions unit is currently required to comply with a BACT or LAER requirement that was established within the preceding 10 years. In such a case, the assumed control level for that emissions unit shall be equal to the level of BACT or LAER with which that emissions unit must currently comply. ( c) The owner or operator obtains a major NSR permit for all emissions unit( s) identified in paragraph ( aa)( 11)( i)( a) of this section, regardless of the magnitude of the emissions increase resulting from them ( that is, no significant levels apply). These emissions unit( s) shall comply with any emissions requirements resulting from the major NSR process ( for example, BACT), even though they have also become subject to the PAL or continue to be subject to the PAL. ( d) The PAL permit shall require that the increased PAL level shall be effective on the day any emissions unit that is part of the PAL major modification becomes operational and begins to emit the PAL pollutant. ( ii) The Administrator shall calculate the new PAL as the sum of the allowable emissions for each modified or new emissions unit, plus the sum of the baseline actual emissions of the significant and major emissions units ( assuming application of BACT equivalent controls as determined in accordance with paragraph ( aa)( 11)( i)( b)), plus the sum of the baseline actual emissions of the small emissions units. ( iii) The PAL permit shall be revised to reflect the increased PAL level pursuant to the public notice requirements of paragraph ( aa)( 5) of this section. ( 12) Monitoring requirements for PALs. ( i) General requirements. ( a) Each PAL permit must contain enforceable requirements for the monitoring system that accurately determines plantwide emissions of the PAL pollutant in terms of mass per unit of time. Any monitoring system authorized for use in the PAL permit must be based on sound science and meet generally acceptable scientific procedures for data quality and manipulation. Additionally, the information generated by such system must meet minimum legal requirements for admissibility in a judicial proceeding to enforce the PAL permit. ( b) The PAL monitoring system must employ one or more of the four general monitoring approaches meeting the minimum requirements set forth in paragraphs ( aa)( 12)( ii)( a) through ( d) of this section and must be approved by the Administrator. ( c) Notwithstanding paragraph ( aa)( 12)( i)( b) of this section, you may also employ an alternative monitoring approach that meets paragraph ( aa)( 12)( i)( a) of this section if approved by the Administrator. ( d) Failure to use a monitoring system that meets the requirements of this section renders the PAL invalid. ( ii) Minimum performance requirements for approved monitoring approaches. The following are acceptable general monitoring VerDate Dec< 13> 2002 09: 09 Dec 30, 2002 Jkt 200001 PO 00000 Frm 00103 Fmt 4701 Sfmt 4700 E:\ FR\ FM\ 31DER3. SGM 31DER3 80288 Federal Register / Vol. 67, No. 251 / Tuesday, December 31, 2002 / Rules and Regulations approaches when conducted in accordance with the minimum requirements in paragraphs ( aa)( 12)( iii) through ( ix) of this section: ( a) Mass balance calculations for activities using coatings or solvents; ( b) CEMS; ( c) CPMS or PEMS; and ( d) Emission factors. ( iii) Mass balance calculations. An owner or operator using mass balance calculations to monitor PAL pollutant emissions from activities using coating or solvents shall meet the following requirements: ( a) Provide a demonstrated means of validating the published content of the PAL pollutant that is contained in or created by all materials used in or at the emissions unit; ( b) Assume that the emissions unit emits all of the PAL pollutant that is contained in or created by any raw material or fuel used in or at the emissions unit, if it cannot otherwise be accounted for in the process; and ( c) Where the vendor of a material or fuel, which is used in or at the emissions unit, publishes a range of pollutant content from such material, the owner or operator must use the highest value of the range to calculate the PAL pollutant emissions unless the Administrator determines there is sitespecific data or a site specific monitoring program to support another content within the range. ( iv) CEMS. An owner or operator using CEMS to monitor PAL pollutant emissions shall meet the following requirements: ( a) CEMS must comply with applicable Performance Specifications found in 40 CFR part 60, appendix B; and ( b) CEMS must sample, analyze and record data at least every 15 minutes while the emissions unit is operating. ( v) CPMS or PEMS. An owner or operator using CPMS or PEMS to monitor PAL pollutant emissions shall meet the following requirements: ( a) The CPMS or the PEMS must be based on current site specific data demonstrating a correlation between the monitored parameter( s) and the PAL pollutant emissions across the range of operation of the emissions unit; and ( b) Each CPMS or PEMS must sample, analyze, and record data at least every 15 minutes, or at another less frequent interval approved by the Administrator, while the emissions unit is operating. ( vi) Emission factors. An owner or operator using emission factors to monitor PAL pollutant emissions shall meet the following requirements: ( a) All emission factors shall be adjusted, if appropriate, to account for the degree of uncertainty or limitations in the factors' development; ( b) The emissions unit shall operate within the designated range of use for the emission factor, if applicable; and ( c) If technically practicable, the owner or operator of a significant emissions unit that relies on an emission factor to calculate PAL pollutant emissions shall conduct validation testing to determine a sitespecific emission factor within 6 months of PAL permit issuance, unless the Administrator determines that testing is not required. ( vii) A source owner or operator must record and report maximum potential emissions without considering enforceable emission limitations or operational restrictions for an emissions unit during any period of time that there is no monitoring data, unless another method for determining emissions during such periods is specified in the PAL permit. ( viii) Notwithstanding the requirements in paragraphs ( aa)( 12)( iii) through ( vii) of this section, where an owner or operator of an emissions unit cannot demonstrate a correlation between the monitored parameter( s) and the PAL pollutant emissions rate at all operating points of the emissions unit, the Administrator shall, at the time of permit issuance: ( a) Establish default value( s) for determining compliance with the PAL based on the highest potential emissions reasonably estimated at such operating point( s); or ( b) Determine that operation of the emissions unit during operating conditions when there is no correlation between monitored parameter( s) and the PAL pollutant emissions is a violation of the PAL. ( ix) Re validation. All data used to establish the PAL pollutant must be revalidated through performance testing or other scientifically valid means approved by the Administrator. Such testing must occur at least once every 5 years after issuance of the PAL. ( 13) Recordkeeping requirements. ( i) The PAL permit shall require an owner or operator to retain a copy of all records necessary to determine compliance with any requirement of paragraph ( aa) of this section and of the PAL, including a determination of each emissions unit's 12 month rolling total emissions, for 5 years from the date of such record. ( ii) The PAL permit shall require an owner or operator to retain a copy of the following records for the duration of the PAL effective period plus 5 years: ( a) A copy of the PAL permit application and any applications for revisions to the PAL; and ( b) Each annual certification of compliance pursuant to title V and the data relied on in certifying the compliance. ( 14) Reporting and notification requirements. The owner or operator shall submit semi annual monitoring reports and prompt deviation reports to the Administrator in accordance with the applicable title V operating permit program. The reports shall meet the requirements in paragraphs ( aa)( 14)( i) through ( iii) of this section. ( i) Semi annual report. The semiannual report shall be submitted to the Administrator within 30 days of the end of each reporting period. This report shall contain the information required in paragraphs ( aa)( 14)( i)( a) through ( g) of this section. ( a) The identification of owner and operator and the permit number. ( b) Total annual emissions ( tons/ year) based on a 12 month rolling total for each month in the reporting period recorded pursuant to paragraph ( aa)( 13)( i) of this section. ( c) All data relied upon, including, but not limited to, any Quality Assurance or Quality Control data, in calculating the monthly and annual PAL pollutant emissions. ( d) A list of any emissions units modified or added to the major stationary source during the preceding 6 month period. ( e) The number, duration, and cause of any deviations or monitoring malfunctions ( other than the time associated with zero and span calibration checks), and any corrective action taken. ( f) A notification of a shutdown of any monitoring system, whether the shutdown was permanent or temporary, the reason for the shutdown, the anticipated date that the monitoring system will be fully operational or replaced with another monitoring system, and whether the emissions unit monitored by the monitoring system continued to operate, and the calculation of the emissions of the pollutant or the number determined by method included in the permit, as provided by ( aa)( 12)( vii). ( g) A signed statement by the responsible official ( as defined by the applicable title V operating permit program) certifying the truth, accuracy, and completeness of the information provided in the report. ( ii) Deviation report. The major stationary source owner or operator shall promptly submit reports of any deviations or exceedance of the PAL VerDate Dec< 13> 2002 09: 09 Dec 30, 2002 Jkt 200001 PO 00000 Frm 00104 Fmt 4701 Sfmt 4700 E:\ FR\ FM\ 31DER3. SGM 31DER3 80289 Federal Register / Vol. 67, No. 251 / Tuesday, December 31, 2002 / Rules and Regulations requirements, including periods where no monitoring is available. A report submitted pursuant to § 70.6( a)( 3)( iii)( B) of this chapter shall satisfy this reporting requirement. The deviation reports shall be submitted within the time limits prescribed by the applicable program implementing § 70.6( a)( 3)( iii)( B) of this chapter. The reports shall contain the following information: ( a) The identification of owner and operator and the permit number; ( b) The PAL requirement that experienced the deviation or that was exceeded; ( c) Emissions resulting from the deviation or the exceedance; and ( d) A signed statement by the responsible official ( as defined by the applicable title V operating permit program) certifying the truth, accuracy, and completeness of the information provided in the report. ( iii) Re validation results. The owner or operator shall submit to the Administrator the results of any revalidation test or method within 3 months after completion of such test or method. ( 15) Transition requirements. ( i) The Administrator may not issue a PAL that does not comply with the requirements in paragraphs ( aa)( 1) through ( 15) of this section after March 3, 2003. ( ii) The Administrator may supersede any PAL that was established prior to March 3, 2003 with a PAL that complies with the requirements of paragraphs ( aa)( 1) through ( 15) of this section. ( bb) If any provision of this section, or the application of such provision to any person or circumstance, is held invalid, the remainder of this section, or the application of such provision to persons or circumstances other than those as to which it is held invalid, shall not be affected thereby.

[ FR Doc. 02   31899 Filed 12   30   02; 8: 45 am]

BILLING CODE 6560   50   P VerDate Dec< 13> 2002 09: 09 Dec 30, 2002 Jkt 200001 PO 00000 Frm 00105 Fmt 4701 Sfmt 4700 E:\ FR\ FM\ 31DER3. SGM 31DER3


[Federal Register Volume 83, Number 226 (Friday, November 23, 2018)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Pages 59315-59317]
[FR Doc No: 2018-25486]

=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY

40 CFR Part 52

[EPA-R08-OAR-2016-0585; FRL-9986-14-Region 8]

Approval and Promulgation of Air Quality Implementation Plans;
State of Utah; Logan Nonattainment Area Fine Particulate Matter State
Implementation Plan for Attainment of 2006 24-Hour Fine Particulate
Matter National Ambient Air Quality Standards

AGENCY: Environmental Protection Agency (EPA).

ACTION: Final rule.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) is finalizing
approval of the emissions inventory, modeled attainment demonstration,
determination for Major Stationary Source Reasonably Available Control
Technology (RACT), determination for On-Road Mobile Sources Reasonably
Available Control Measures (RACM), determination for Cache County
Inspection and Maintenance (I/M) Program as additional reasonable
measures, determination for Off-Road Mobile Sources RACM, and the 2015
Motor Vehicle Emission Budgets (MVEB) portions of the attainment plan
submitted by Utah on December 16, 2014, to address Clean Air Act (CAA
or the Act) requirements for the 2006 24-hour fine particulate matter
(PM2.5) national ambient air quality standards (NAAQS) in
the Logan, Utah (UT)--Idaho (ID) Moderate PM2.5
nonattainment area. These actions are being taken under section 110 of
the CAA.

DATES: This final rule is effective on December 24, 2018.

ADDRESSES: The EPA has established a docket for this action under
Docket ID No. EPA-R08-OAR-2016-0585. All documents in the docket are
listed on the http://www.regulations.gov website. Although listed in
the index, some information is not publicly available, e.g., CBI or
other information whose disclosure is restricted by statute. Certain
other material, such as copyrighted material, is not placed on the
internet and will be publicly available only in hard copy form.
Publicly available docket materials are available through http://www.regulations.gov, or please contact the person identified in the For
Further Information Contact section for additional availability
information.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Crystal Ostigaard, Air Program, U.S.
EPA, Region 8, Mailcode 8P-AR, 1595 Wynkoop Street, Denver, Colorado
80202-1129,<PHONE_NUMBER>, [email protected].

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Throughout this document ``we,'' means the
EPA.

I. Background

    On October 17, 2006 (71 FR 61144), the Environmental Protection
Agency (EPA) revised the level of the 24-hour fine particulate matter
(PM2.5) National Ambient Air Quality Standard (NAAQS),
lowering the primary and secondary standards from the 1997 standard of
65 micrograms per cubic meter ([micro]g/m\3\) to 35 [micro]g/m\3\. On
November 13, 2009 (74 FR 58688), the EPA designated three nonattainment
areas in Utah for the 24-hour PM2.5 NAAQS of 35 [micro]g/
m\3\. These are the Salt Lake City, Utah (UT); Provo, UT; and Logan,
UT-Idaho (ID) nonattainment areas. The State of Utah submitted the
Logan, UT-ID Moderate PM2.5 state implementation plan (SIP)
on December 16, 2014, to address the requirements under part D of title
I of the Clean Air Act (CAA) for the Logan UT-ID PM2.5
nonattainment area.
    On December 4, 2017 (82 FR 57183), the EPA proposed to approve
portions of the December 16, 2014 Logan, UT-ID Moderate
PM2.5 SIP submittal. Specifically, we proposed to approve:
     The 2010 base year and 2015 projection year emissions
inventories;
     The modeled attainment demonstration;
     The RACM/RACT and additional reasonable measure
determinations for on-road mobile, including the Cache County I/M
Program, off-road mobile, and major stationary sources; and
     The direct PM2.5, nitrogen oxides
(NOX) and volatile organic compound (VOC) MVEBs for 2015 and
the MVEB trading mechanism.
    Our proposal provides details on the EPA's evaluation of these
portions of the State's submittal.

II. Response to Comments

    The EPA received seven public comments on the proposed action.
After reviewing the comments received, the EPA has determined that the
comments, with the exception of a portion of one comment, fall outside
the scope of our proposed action or fail to identify any material issue
necessitating a response.
    A portion of one comment (EPA-R08-OAR-2016-0585-0017) generally
alleges that the EPA lacks actual measurements of what agriculture
emits in the form of PM2.5, and that agriculture is not a
major emitter of PM2.5. The comment states that the data
used to develop ``the inventory'' was based on erroneous emission
factors published by ``CPA'' \1\ for cattle feed yards, feed mills,
grain elevators, and dust from farmers' field operations; however,
according to the comment, there ``has never been any actual PM-2.5
emission data taken on agricultural tillage equipment using EPA
approved PM-2.5 samplers.'' The comment also alleges that ``wildfire
emissions were not added to the data.''
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \1\ The comment does not define this acronym, but we assume the
comment intended to refer to EPA.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    Assuming that the comment is intended to refer to the emissions
inventories that Utah prepared and submitted for the Logan, UT-ID
Moderate PM2.5 SIP and that the EPA proposed to approve, we
respond as follows. The comment alleges the use of ``erroneous''
emission factors without identifying any specific error in the emission
factors. Under the SIP Requirements Rule, Utah was not required to run
tests on agricultural tillage equipment to develop emissions
inventories; instead the requirements for emissions inventories are set
forth in 40 CFR 51.1008. See Fine Particulate Matter National Ambient
Air Quality Standards: State Implementation Plan Requirements, 81 FR
58010, 58027-33 (Aug. 24, 2016). The comment does not indicate any way
in which the inventories fail to meet those requirements. Finally, for
the purposes of PM2.5 nonattainment areas such as the Logan,
UT-ID area, wildfire emissions are generally accounted for through the
EPA's Exceptional Events Rule,\2\ not through emissions inventories.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \2\ 40 CFR 50.14.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

III. Final Action

    For the reasons stated in our proposal, the EPA is finalizing
approval of portions of Utah's SIP found at R307-110-10, Section IX
Control Measures for Area and Point Sources, Part A, Fine Particulate
Matter for the Logan, UT-ID nonattainment area and at SIP Subsection
IX.A.23: Control Measures for Area and Point Sources, Fine Particulate
Matter for the Logan, UT-ID nonattainment area. Specifically, we are
approving the following portions of the Logan, UT-ID Moderate
PM2.5 SIP submitted by the State on December 16, 2014:
     The 2010 base year and 2015 projection year emissions
inventories;
     The modeled attainment demonstration;
     The RACM/RACT and additional reasonable measure
demonstrations for on-road mobile, including the Cache

County I/M Program, off-road mobile and major stationary sources; and
     The direct PM2.5, nitrogen oxides
(NOX) and VOC MVEBs for 2015 and the MVEB trading mechanism.

IV. Incorporation by Reference

    In this rule, the EPA is finalizing regulatory text that includes
incorporation by reference. In accordance with requirements of 1 CFR
51.5, the EPA is finalizing the incorporation by reference of the
approval of portions of the Logan, UT-ID PM2.5 Moderate SIP
submitted by the State of Utah as discussed in the proposed rule. The
EPA has made, and will continue to make, these materials generally
available through www.regulations.gov and at the EPA Region 8 Office
(please contact the person identified in the For Further Information
Contact section of this preamble for more information). Therefore,
these materials have been approved by the EPA for inclusion in the
state implementation plan, have been incorporated by reference by the
EPA into that plan, are fully federally enforceable under sections 110
and 113 of the CAA as of the effective date of the final rulemaking of
the EPA's approval, and will be incorporated by reference in the next
update to the SIP compilation.\3\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \3\ 62 FR 27968 (May 22, 1997).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

V. Statutory and Executive Order Reviews

    Under the CAA, the Administrator is required to approve a SIP
submission that complies with the provisions of the Act and applicable
federal regulations. 42 U.S.C. 7410(k); 40 CFR 52.02(a). Thus, in
reviewing SIP submissions, the EPA's role is to approve state choices,
provided that they meet the criteria of the CAA. Accordingly, this
action merely approves state law as meeting federal requirements and
does not impose additional requirements beyond those imposed by state
law. For that reason, this final action:
     Is not a ``significant regulatory action'' subject to
review by the Office of Management and Budget under Executive Order
12866 (58 FR 51735, October 4, 1993) and 13563 (76 FR 3821, January 21,
2011);
     is not an Executive Order 13771 (82 FR 9339, February 2,
2017) regulatory action because SIP approvals are exempted under
Executive Order 12866;
     does not impose an information collection burden under the
provisions of the Paperwork Reduction Act (44 U.S.C. 3501 et seq.);
     is certified as not having a significant economic impact
on a substantial number of small entities under the Regulatory
Flexibility Act (5 U.S.C. 601 et seq.);
     does not contain any unfunded mandate or significantly or
uniquely affect small governments, as described in the Unfunded
Mandates Reform Act of 1995 (Pub. L. 104-4);
     does not have federalism implications as specified in
Executive Order 13132 (64 FR 43255, August 10, 1999);
     is not an economically significant regulatory action based
on health or safety risks subject to Executive Order 13045 (62 FR
19885, April 23, 1997);
     is not a significant regulatory action subject to
Executive Order 13211 (66 FR 28355, May 22, 2001);
     is not subject to requirements of Section 12(d) of the
National Technology Transfer and Advancement Act of 1995 (15 U.S.C. 272
note) because application of those requirements would be inconsistent
with the CAA; and
     does not provide the EPA with the discretionary authority
to address, as appropriate, disproportionate human health or
environmental effects, using practicable and legally permissible
methods, under Executive Order 12898 (59 FR 7629, February 16, 1994).
    In addition, the SIP is not approved to apply on any Indian
reservation land or in any other area where the EPA or an Indian tribe
has demonstrated that a tribe has jurisdiction. In those areas of
Indian country, the rule does not have tribal implications and will not
impose substantial direct costs on tribal governments or preempt tribal
law as specified by Executive Order 13175 (65 FR 67249, November 9,
2000).
    The Congressional Review Act, 5 U.S.C. 801 et seq., as added by the
Small Business Regulatory Enforcement Fairness Act of 1996, generally
provides that before a rule may take effect, the agency promulgating
the rule must submit a rule report, which includes a copy of the rule,
to each House of the Congress and to the Comptroller General of the
United States. The EPA will submit a report containing this action and
other required information to the U.S. Senate, the U.S. House of
Representatives and the Comptroller General of the United States prior
to publication of the rule in the Federal Register. A major rule cannot
take effect until 60 days after it is published in the Federal
Register. This action is not a ``major rule'' as defined by 5 U.S.C.
804(2).
    Under section 307(b)(1) of the Clean Air Act, petitions for
judicial review of this action must be filed in the United States Court
of Appeals for the appropriate circuit by January 22, 2019. Filing a
petition for reconsideration by the Administrator of this final rule
does not affect the finality of this action for the purposes of
judicial review nor does it extend the time within which a petition for
judicial review may be filed, and shall not postpone the effectiveness
of such rule or action. This action may not be challenged later in
proceedings to enforce its requirements. (See section 307(b)(2).)

List of Subjects in 40 CFR Part 52

    Environmental protection, Air pollution control, Ammonia,
Incorporation by reference, Intergovernmental relations, Nitrogen
dioxide, Particulate matter, Reporting and recordkeeping requirements,
Sulfur dioxide, Volatile organic compounds.

    Dated: November 16, 2018.
Douglas Benevento,
Regional Administrator, EPA, Region 8.

    40 CFR part 52 is amended as follows:

PART 52--APPROVAL AND PROMULGATION OF IMPLEMENTATION PLANS

0
1. The authority citation for part 52 continues to read as follows:

    Authority: 42 U.S.C. 7401 et seq.

Subpart TT--Utah

0
2. Section 52.2320 is amended by:
0
a. Revising the entry for ``R307-110-10'' in the table in paragraph
(c); and
0
b. Adding the entry, in numerical order, ``Section IX.A.23. Fine
Particulate Matter, PM2.5 SIP for the Logan, UT-ID
Nonattainment Area'' in the table in paragraph (e).
    The revision and addition reads as follows:

Sec.  52.2320  Identification of plan.

* * * * *
    (c) * * *

----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
                                                      State          Final rule
          Rule No.                Rule title     effective date    citation, date             Comments
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

                                                  * * * * * * *
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
                            R307-110. General Requirements: State Implementation Plan
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

                                                  * * * * * * *
R307-110-10.................  Section IX.             12/4/2014  [Insert Federal
                               Control Measures                   Register
                               for Area and                       citation], 11/23/
                               Point Sources,                     2018.
                               Part A, Fine
                               Particulate
                               Matter.

                                                  * * * * * * *
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

* * * * *
    (e) * * *

----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
                                               State
               Rule title                 effective date   Final rule citation, date           Comments
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

                                                  * * * * * * *
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
                                 IX. Control Measures for Area and Point Sources
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

                                                  * * * * * * *
Section IX.A.23. Fine Particulate              12/4/2014  [Insert Federal Register    Except for Chapters 1-3,
 Matter, PM2.5 SIP for the Logan, UT-ID                    citation], 11/23/2018.      Area Sources found in
 Nonattainment Area.                                                                   Chapter 6.6, Chapter 8
                                                                                and Chapter 9.

                                                  * * * * * * *
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

[FR Doc. 2018-25486 Filed 11-21-18; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6560-50-P