Record for the Final Metal Product and Machinery Rule 12345 6 789 10 11 12 13 14 15 A B C D E F VARIABLE DESCRIPTIONS FOR FACDATA_ JULY. XLS VARIABLE DESCRIPTION WORKSHEET COLUMN CBI FORMULA SID$ Survey ID FacData A N Discharge Discharge type: D= Direct; I= Indirect FacData B N Sector Sector Abbreviation FacData C Y Entity Size Entity Size: Large business= 0; Small business= 1; Maybe Large ( exceeds one threshold but not the other)= 2; Unknown= 3 FacData D Y The Phase 1, Phase 2, and Iron & Steel data come from Small_ JULY. xls. The muni data comes from MuniMPCT_ JULY. xls. The rail data comes from RailMPCT_ JULY. xls. Flow Cat Flow Range: 0: <= 1 million gallons per year; 1: 1 2 mgy; 2: 2 3 mgy; 3: 3 4 mgy; 4: 4 5 mgy; 5: 5 6.25 mgy; 6: over 6.25 mgy FacData E Y = VLOOKUP( A6, Flow, 3,0)

Weight Sample weight FacData F Y Survey Survey Type ( e. g., long, municipality) FacData G N Subcat Subcategory FacData H Y Flow Baseline Annual Flow FacData I Y = VLOOKUP( A6, Flow, 2,0) Revenue Source Revenue Source: M= Revenues come from manufacturing only; R= Revenues come from rebuilding and maintenance only; B= Revenues come from both manufacturing and rebuilding and maintenance; U= Unknown; MU= Municipality FacData J N = VLOOKUP( A6,[ RevbySct_ July. xls] Summary!$ A$ 3:$ BV$ 1000,64,0)

SID$ Survey ID Flow A N Flow Baseline site annual flow Flow F Y Cat Flow Range: 0: <= 1 million gallons per year; 1: 1 2 mgy; 2: 2 3 mgy; 3: 3 4 mgy; 4: 4 5 mgy; 5: 5 6.25 mgy; 6: over 6.25 mgy Flow G Y = IF( F8<= 1000000,0, IF( F8<= 2000000,1, IF( F8<= 3000000,2, IF( F8<= 4000000,3, I F( F8<= 5000000,4, IF( F8<= 6250000,5,6))))))

February 14, 2003 Page 1 of 19 facdata_ July. xls  Var Desc Record for the Final Metal Product and Machinery Rule 12 34 56789 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 A B C D E F G H I J 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 Facility Data SID$ Discharge Sector Emp Size Flow Cat Weight Survey Type Subcat Flow Revenue Source 2 I Long M 3 I Phase 1 M 4 I Municipality MU 5 I Long U 6 I Long M 7 I Phase 1 M 8 D Long M 9 I Long M 10 I Phase 1 R 11 D Phase 1 M 12 I Phase 1 M 13 I Phase 1 M 14 I Phase 1 M 15 I Phase 1 M 16 I Phase 1 M 17 I Municipality MU 18 D Municipality MU 19 D Municipality MU 20 I Phase 1 M 21 I Long M 22 I Long M 23 I Municipality MU 24 I Phase 1 U 25 I Phase 1 B 26 I Long M 27 I Long M 28 I Phase 1 M 29 I Long M 30 I Municipality MU 31 I Phase 1 U 32 I Phase 1 M 33 I Long M 34 I Municipality MU 35 I Phase 1 M 36 I Long M 37 I Short M 38 I Phase 1 M 39 D Municipality MU 40 I Municipality MU 41 I Long M 42 I Phase 1 M 43 I Phase 1 M 44 I Long M 45 I Long M 46 I Phase 1 M 47 I Long M 48 I Phase 1 M 50 D Long M 51 I Long M 52 I Phase 1 M 53 I Long M 54 I Municipality MU 55 I Phase 1 B 56 D Rail R February 14, 2003 Page 2 of 19 facdata_ July. xls  FacData Record for the Final Metal Product and Machinery Rule 34 5 A B C D E F G H I J Facility Data SID$ Discharge Sector Emp Size Flow Cat Weight Survey Type Subcat Flow Revenue Source 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 100 101 102 103 104 105 106 107 108 109 110 111 112 113 114 115 57 I Phase 1 M 58 I Phase 1 M 59 I Phase 1 R 60 I Phase 1 U 61 I Long B 62 D Long M 63 D Iron & Steel M 64 I Long M 65 D Long U 66 D Iron & Steel M 67 I Long B 68 I Phase 1 M 69 I Phase 1 M 70 I Phase 1 M 71 I Short M 72 I Phase 1 M 73 I Phase 1 M 74 I Long R 75 I Long M 76 D Phase 1 M 77 I Phase 1 M 78 I Phase 1 B 79 I Long M 80 D Rail R 81 I Long M 82 I Municipality MU 83 I Phase 1 M 84 D Phase 1 M 85 I Phase 1 B 86 I Phase 1 M 87 I Long M 88 I Phase 1 U 89 I Short R 90 I Long M 91 I Long M 92 I Long R 93 I Municipality MU 94 I Phase 1 M 95 I Short M 96 D Phase 1 M 97 I Long M 98 I Municipality MU 99 I Long M 100 D Phase 1 M 101 I Long M 102 I Phase 1 B 103 I Long M 104 I Municipality MU 105 I Phase 1 M 106 I Short M 107 D Municipality MU 108 I Long R 109 I Phase 1 U 110 I Long B 111 I Long M 112 I Phase 1 M February 14, 2003 Page 3 of 19 facdata_ July. xls  FacData Record for the Final Metal Product and Machinery Rule 34 5 A B C D E F G H I J Facility Data SID$ Discharge Sector Emp Size Flow Cat Weight Survey Type Subcat Flow Revenue Source 116 117 118 119 120 121 122 123 124 125 126 127 128 129 130 131 132 133 134 135 136 137 138 139 140 141 142 143 144 145 146 147 148 149 150 151 152 153 154 155 156 157 158 159 160 161 162 163 164 165 166 167 168 169 170 171 113 I Long M 114 I Phase 1 M 115 I Phase 1 M 116 I Long M 117 I Municipality MU 118 D Phase 1 U 119 I Phase 1 M 120 I Phase 1 M 121 I Long U 122 I Long M 123 I Municipality MU 124 D Rail R 125 I Phase 1 B 126 I Long M 127 I Long R 128 D Long M 129 I Phase 1 M 130 I Phase 1 M 131 I Long M 132 I Phase 1 M 133 I Municipality MU 134 I Municipality MU 135 I Phase 1 M 136 I Phase 1 M 137 I Long M 138 I Phase 1 M 139 I Municipality MU 140 I Long M 141 D Phase 1 B 142 D Phase 1 M 143 D Phase 1 M 144 D Iron & Steel M 145 I Rail R 146 I Long M 147 I Phase 1 M 148 I Phase 1 M 149 I Phase 1 M 150 I Long M 151 I Long M 152 I Municipality MU 153 I Long R 154 I Phase 1 M 155 I Phase 1 M 156 I Long M 157 I Long M 158 D Rail R 159 I Phase 1 U 160 I Iron & Steel M 161 I Short M 162 I Phase 1 M 163 I Phase 1 M 164 D Phase 1 M 165 I Phase 1 M 166 I Phase 1 M 167 I Municipality MU 168 I Iron & Steel M February 14, 2003 Page 4 of 19 facdata_ July. xls  FacData Record for the Final Metal Product and Machinery Rule 34 5 A B C D E F G H I J Facility Data SID$ Discharge Sector Emp Size Flow Cat Weight Survey Type Subcat Flow Revenue Source 172 173 174 175 176 177 178 179 180 181 182 183 184 185 186 187 188 189 190 191 192 193 194 195 196 197 198 199 200 201 202 203 204 205 206 207 208 209 210 211 212 213 214 215 216 217 218 219 220 221 222 223 224 225 226 227 169 I Iron & Steel M 170 I Phase 1 M 171 I Municipality MU 172 D Phase 1 M 173 I Long M 174 I Phase 1 M 175 I Iron & Steel M 176 I Long M 177 D Phase 1 M 178 I Phase 1 M 179 I Phase 1 M 180 I Iron & Steel M 181 I Phase 1 M 182 I Long M 183 I Phase 1 M 184 D Phase 1 M 185 I Phase 1 M 186 I Long U 187 D Phase 1 M 188 I Phase 1 M 189 I Long M 190 D Phase 1 M 191 I Phase 1 M 192 I Long M 193 I Phase 1 M 194 D Rail R 195 I Long M 196 I Long M 197 I Phase 1 U 198 D Iron & Steel M 199 I Phase 1 M 200 I Phase 1 M 201 I Long M 202 I Phase 1 M 203 I Long M 204 I Long M 205 I Municipality MU 206 D Municipality MU 207 I Long M 208 I Phase 1 M 209 I Phase 1 M 210 D Phase 1 B 211 I Long M 212 I Phase 1 M 213 D Municipality MU 214 D Phase 1 M 215 I Long M 216 I Phase 1 M 217 I Iron & Steel M 218 I Municipality MU 219 I Phase 1 M 220 I Iron & Steel M 221 I Phase 1 M 222 I Long M 223 I Phase 1 M 224 I Short M February 14, 2003 Page 5 of 19 facdata_ July. xls  FacData Record for the Final Metal Product and Machinery Rule 34 5 A B C D E F G H I J Facility Data SID$ Discharge Sector Emp Size Flow Cat Weight Survey Type Subcat Flow Revenue Source 228 229 230 231 232 233 234 235 236 237 238 239 240 241 242 243 244 245 246 247 248 249 250 251 252 253 254 255 256 257 258 259 260 261 262 263 264 265 266 267 268 269 270 271 272 273 274 275 276 277 278 279 280 281 282 283 225 I Long M 226 I Phase 1 M 227 I Phase 1 M 228 I Long M 229 I Phase 1 M 230 I Phase 1 M 231 I Long B 232 D Phase 1 M 233 I Phase 1 U 234 I Long M 235 I Phase 1 B 236 D Rail R 237 I Long M 238 I Rail R 239 D Phase 1 M 240 I Long M 241 I Long M 242 I Long M 243 I Long M 244 I Iron & Steel M 245 D Phase 1 M 246 I Long M 247 I Phase 1 B 248 I Phase 1 B 249 I Phase 1 B 250 I Long M 251 D Iron & Steel M 252 I Phase 1 M 253 I Long R 254 I Phase 1 M 255 I Long M 256 I Iron & Steel M 257 I Long R 258 I Municipality MU 259 I Long M 260 D Phase 1 B 261 I Phase 1 M 262 I Phase 1 B 263 I Long B 264 I Phase 1 M 265 D Phase 1 M 266 D Phase 1 M 267 I Phase 1 M 268 I Phase 1 U 269 I Long M 270 I Long M 271 I Long M 272 I Municipality MU 273 D Phase 1 M 274 D Phase 1 B 275 I Iron & Steel M 276 I Phase 1 M 277 I Municipality MU 278 D Municipality MU 279 I Phase 1 M 280 I Phase 1 U February 14, 2003 Page 6 of 19 facdata_ July. xls  FacData Record for the Final Metal Product and Machinery Rule 34 5 A B C D E F G H I J Facility Data SID$ Discharge Sector Emp Size Flow Cat Weight Survey Type Subcat Flow Revenue Source 284 285 286 287 288 289 290 291 292 293 294 295 296 297 298 299 300 301 302 303 304 305 306 307 308 309 310 311 312 313 314 315 316 317 318 319 320 321 322 323 324 325 326 327 328 329 330 331 332 333 334 335 336 337 338 339 281 D Phase 1 B 282 I Phase 1 M 283 D Phase 1 U 284 D Phase 1 B 285 I Phase 1 M 286 I Short M 287 D Municipality MU 288 I Phase 1 M 289 I Phase 1 M 290 I Long M 291 I Short R 292 I Municipality MU 293 I Phase 1 M 294 D Iron & Steel M 295 I Long M 296 I Phase 1 M 297 I Iron & Steel M 298 I Long R 299 I Long M 300 I Long M 301 I Phase 1 M 302 I Phase 1 M 303 I Phase 1 M 304 D Phase 1 U 305 I Phase 1 M 306 D Phase 1 U 307 I Short M 308 I Long M 309 I Phase 1 M 310 I Long M 311 I Municipality MU 312 I Long M 313 I Phase 1 M 314 I Phase 1 B 315 I Phase 1 M 316 I Long M 317 I Municipality MU 318 I Municipality MU 319 D Phase 1 M 320 I Phase 1 U 321 I Iron & Steel M 322 I Phase 1 M 323 I Phase 1 M 324 I Long B 325 I Phase 1 M 326 I Phase 1 M 327 I Long M 328 I Long M 329 I Long B 330 I Long M 331 I Phase 1 M 332 I Long U 333 I Phase 1 B 334 D Long M 335 I Phase 1 M 336 I Phase 1 M February 14, 2003 Page 7 of 19 facdata_ July. xls  FacData Record for the Final Metal Product and Machinery Rule 34 5 A B C D E F G H I J Facility Data SID$ Discharge Sector Emp Size Flow Cat Weight Survey Type Subcat Flow Revenue Source 340 341 342 343 344 345 346 347 348 349 350 351 352 353 354 355 356 357 358 359 360 361 362 363 364 365 366 367 368 369 370 371 372 373 374 375 376 377 378 379 380 381 382 383 384 385 386 387 388 389 390 391 392 393 394 395 337 I Long U 338 I Phase 1 M 339 D Long M 340 I Phase 1 M 341 I Municipality MU 342 I Long M 343 I Iron & Steel M 344 I Iron & Steel M 345 I Phase 1 M 346 I Municipality MU 347 I Municipality MU 348 I Municipality MU 349 I Long M 350 I Long M 351 I Phase 1 M 352 D Rail R 353 D Municipality MU 354 I Iron & Steel M 355 I Long M 356 I Municipality MU 357 I Long M 358 D Phase 1 M 359 I Phase 1 U 360 D Municipality MU 361 I Phase 1 M 362 I Municipality MU 363 I Phase 1 B 364 I Phase 1 M 365 I Phase 1 M 366 I Phase 1 M 367 I Iron & Steel M 368 I Municipality MU 369 I Phase 1 U 370 I Phase 1 M 371 I Short R 372 I Long M 373 I Rail R 374 I Long M 375 I Phase 1 U 376 I Phase 1 M 377 D Phase 1 M 378 I Phase 1 M 379 I Municipality MU 380 I Phase 1 M 381 I Phase 1 M 382 I Rail R 383 I Long M 384 I Phase 1 M 385 I Municipality MU 386 I Phase 1 M 387 I Phase 1 B 388 I Phase 1 M 389 D Iron & Steel M 390 D Phase 1 M 391 I Municipality MU 392 D Long M February 14, 2003 Page 8 of 19 facdata_ July. xls  FacData Record for the Final Metal Product and Machinery Rule 34 5 A B C D E F G H I J Facility Data SID$ Discharge Sector Emp Size Flow Cat Weight Survey Type Subcat Flow Revenue Source 396 397 398 399 400 401 402 403 404 405 406 407 408 409 410 411 412 413 414 415 416 417 418 419 420 421 422 423 424 425 426 427 428 429 430 431 432 433 434 435 436 437 438 439 440 441 442 443 444 445 446 447 448 449 450 451 393 I Long M 394 D Municipality MU 395 D Phase 1 M 396 I Phase 1 M 397 I Municipality MU 398 I Phase 1 B 399 I Phase 1 M 400 I Long M 401 I Long M 402 I Long M 403 D Phase 1 M 404 D Phase 1 U 405 I Municipality MU 406 I Long M 407 I Long M 408 I Phase 1 M 409 I Phase 1 M 410 I Phase 1 M 411 I Long M 412 D Long M 413 D Phase 1 U 414 I Phase 1 M 415 I Iron & Steel M 416 I Phase 1 M 417 I Long R 418 I Phase 1 M 419 I Long M 420 I Long M 421 I Long M 422 I Phase 1 M 423 I Short M 424 I Phase 1 M 425 I Long M 426 I Phase 1 B 427 I Municipality MU 428 I Phase 1 M 429 I Phase 1 M 430 I Long M 431 I Municipality MU 432 D Rail R 433 I Long M 434 I Short U 435 I Long M 436 I Rail R 437 I Municipality MU 438 I Short R 439 I Long M 440 I Phase 1 M 441 I Phase 1 B 442 I Phase 1 M 443 I Long M 444 I Iron & Steel M 445 I Long B 446 I Phase 1 M 447 I Phase 1 M 448 I Short M February 14, 2003 Page 9 of 19 facdata_ July. xls  FacData Record for the Final Metal Product and Machinery Rule 34 5 A B C D E F G H I J Facility Data SID$ Discharge Sector Emp Size Flow Cat Weight Survey Type Subcat Flow Revenue Source 452 453 454 455 456 457 458 459 460 461 462 463 464 465 466 467 468 469 470 471 472 473 474 475 476 477 478 479 480 481 482 483 484 485 486 487 488 489 490 491 492 493 494 495 496 497 498 499 500 501 502 503 504 505 506 507 449 I Long M 450 I Long M 451 I Phase 1 B 452 I Phase 1 M 453 I Long M 454 D Iron & Steel M 455 I Long M 456 I Phase 1 M 457 I Phase 1 B 458 I Phase 1 M 459 I Phase 1 M 460 I Long R 461 I Phase 1 M 462 I Phase 1 M 463 I Long M 464 I Phase 1 M 465 I Municipality MU 466 I Phase 1 M 467 I Municipality MU 468 D Phase 1 B 469 I Iron & Steel M 470 I Phase 1 M 471 I Short M 472 D Phase 1 U 473 D Phase 1 M 474 I Long R 475 I Phase 1 M 476 I Short M 477 I Long M 478 I Municipality MU 479 I Phase 1 R 480 I Phase 1 M 481 I Phase 1 M 482 I Short M 483 I Municipality MU 484 D Phase 1 M 485 D Municipality MU 486 I Phase 1 M 487 I Long M 488 I Phase 1 M 489 I Phase 1 M 490 I Phase 1 M 491 I Municipality MU 492 I Phase 1 B 493 I Phase 1 M 494 I Long M 495 I Long M 496 I Phase 1 M 497 I Long M 498 D Long M 499 I Municipality MU 500 I Rail R 501 I Long R 502 I Phase 1 M 503 I Long M 504 I Phase 1 M February 14, 2003 Page 10 of 19 facdata_ July. xls  FacData Record for the Final Metal Product and Machinery Rule 34 5 A B C D E F G H I J Facility Data SID$ Discharge Sector Emp Size Flow Cat Weight Survey Type Subcat Flow Revenue Source 508 509 510 511 512 513 514 515 516 517 518 519 520 521 522 523 524 525 526 527 528 529 530 531 532 533 534 535 536 537 538 539 540 541 542 543 544 545 546 547 548 549 550 551 552 553 554 555 556 557 558 559 560 561 562 563 505 I Short R 506 I Long M 507 I Long M 508 I Municipality MU 509 I Phase 1 M 510 I Phase 1 M 511 I Phase 1 M 512 I Iron & Steel M 513 I Long M 514 I Phase 1 M 515 I Phase 1 M 516 D Long M 517 I Long M 518 I Phase 1 M 519 I Long M 520 I Phase 1 M 521 I Municipality MU 522 I Phase 1 B 523 I Phase 1 M 524 I Phase 1 M 525 I Long M 526 I Phase 1 M 527 I Short M 528 I Long M 529 I Iron & Steel M 530 I Phase 1 M 531 I Phase 1 M 532 I Phase 1 B 533 I Long M 534 D Phase 1 M 535 I Municipality MU 536 I Phase 1 U 537 I Phase 1 M 538 I Phase 1 B 539 D Phase 1 B 540 I Phase 1 U 541 I Municipality MU 542 I Phase 1 M 543 I Long M 544 I Iron & Steel M 545 I Phase 1 M 546 D Iron & Steel M 547 I Long M 548 I Phase 1 M 549 I Long M 550 I Long M 551 D Phase 1 M 552 I Long M 553 I Municipality MU 554 I Municipality MU 555 I Phase 1 M 556 I Short R 557 I Municipality MU 558 D Municipality MU 559 D Iron & Steel M 560 I Long U February 14, 2003 Page 11 of 19 facdata_ July. xls  FacData Record for the Final Metal Product and Machinery Rule 34 5 A B C D E F G H I J Facility Data SID$ Discharge Sector Emp Size Flow Cat Weight Survey Type Subcat Flow Revenue Source 564 565 566 567 568 569 570 571 572 573 574 575 576 577 578 579 580 581 582 583 584 585 586 587 588 589 590 591 592 593 594 595 596 597 598 599 600 601 602 603 604 605 606 607 608 609 610 611 612 613 614 615 616 617 618 619 561 I Phase 1 M 562 I Rail R 563 I Long M 564 I Long M 565 I Municipality MU 566 I Phase 1 M 567 I Phase 1 M 568 I Municipality MU 569 I Municipality MU 570 D Phase 1 M 571 I Municipality MU 572 D Rail R 573 I Municipality MU 574 D Phase 1 M 575 I Long M 576 I Municipality MU 577 I Long M 578 I Phase 1 M 579 I Phase 1 M 580 I Long M 581 I Municipality MU 582 I Municipality MU 583 D Phase 1 M 584 I Long M 585 I Phase 1 M 586 I Phase 1 M 587 D Long M 588 D Municipality MU 589 I Municipality MU 590 I Phase 1 M 591 I Long M 592 I Phase 1 M 593 D Iron & Steel M 594 I Long M 595 I Phase 1 B 596 I Rail R 597 D Long M 598 I Long M 599 D Long M 600 I Long M 601 I Iron & Steel M 602 I Municipality MU 603 I Phase 1 M 604 D Municipality MU 605 I Phase 1 M 606 I Long M 607 I Short M 608 I Phase 1 M 609 I Phase 1 M 610 I Long M 611 D Phase 1 M 612 I Phase 1 M 613 I Phase 1 M 614 I Phase 1 M 615 I Phase 1 M 616 D Phase 1 B February 14, 2003 Page 12 of 19 facdata_ July. xls  FacData Record for the Final Metal Product and Machinery Rule 34 5 A B C D E F G H I J Facility Data SID$ Discharge Sector Emp Size Flow Cat Weight Survey Type Subcat Flow Revenue Source 620 621 622 623 624 625 626 627 628 629 630 631 632 633 634 635 636 637 638 639 640 641 642 643 644 645 646 647 648 649 650 651 652 653 654 655 656 657 658 659 660 661 662 663 664 665 666 667 668 669 670 671 672 673 674 675 617 I Phase 1 M 618 I Iron & Steel M 619 I Long M 620 I Rail R 621 I Phase 1 M 622 D Phase 1 M 623 I Phase 1 M 624 I Phase 1 M 625 I Long M 626 I Long M 627 I Phase 1 M 628 I Long M 629 D Phase 1 M 630 I Phase 1 B 631 I Phase 1 M 632 I Phase 1 M 633 I Phase 1 M 634 D Phase 1 M 635 D Phase 1 M 636 I Long M 637 I Long U 638 I Rail R 639 I Long M 640 I Long U 641 I Long M 642 I Phase 1 U 643 I Long M 644 I Iron & Steel M 645 I Long M 646 I Municipality MU 647 I Municipality MU 648 I Phase 1 M 649 I Long M 650 D Long M 651 I Long M 652 I Municipality MU 653 I Phase 1 M 654 I Iron & Steel M 655 I Phase 1 M 656 D Phase 1 B 657 I Municipality MU 658 I Long B 659 D Rail R 660 I Long U 661 D Phase 1 M 662 I Phase 1 U 663 I Phase 1 M 664 I Phase 1 B 665 I Phase 1 M 666 I Short M 667 I Long M 668 D Long M 669 I Phase 1 M 670 I Long M 671 I Short M 672 I Municipality MU February 14, 2003 Page 13 of 19 facdata_ July. xls  FacData Record for the Final Metal Product and Machinery Rule 34 5 A B C D E F G H I J Facility Data SID$ Discharge Sector Emp Size Flow Cat Weight Survey Type Subcat Flow Revenue Source 676 677 678 679 680 681 682 683 684 685 686 687 688 689 690 691 692 693 694 695 696 697 698 699 700 701 702 703 704 705 706 707 708 709 710 711 712 713 714 715 716 717 718 719 720 721 722 723 724 725 726 727 728 729 730 731 673 I Phase 1 M 674 I Long M 675 I Phase 1 U 676 I Iron & Steel M 677 I Municipality MU 678 I Short B 679 I Phase 1 U 680 I Short M 681 I Phase 1 M 682 I Long M 683 I Phase 1 M 684 I Phase 1 M 685 I Long M 686 I Municipality MU 687 I Phase 1 M 688 D Phase 1 M 689 I Municipality MU 690 I Phase 1 M 691 I Municipality MU 692 I Municipality MU 693 I Phase 1 M 694 I Long M 695 I Phase 1 B 696 I Phase 1 M 697 I Iron & Steel M 698 I Short R 699 I Short M 700 I Phase 1 M 701 D Long M 702 I Long M 703 I Short B 704 I Phase 1 B 705 I Phase 1 M 706 I Phase 1 U 707 I Phase 1 M 708 I Phase 1 M 709 I Long B 710 I Phase 1 M 711 I Phase 1 M 712 I Long M 713 I Long M 714 D Phase 1 M 715 I Long M 716 I Long M 717 I Phase 1 M 718 I Phase 1 M 719 I Long M 720 I Phase 1 M 721 I Long M 722 I Short M 723 I Long M 724 I Long M 725 I Long M 726 D Phase 1 M 727 D Long R 728 I Long M February 14, 2003 Page 14 of 19 facdata_ July. xls  FacData Record for the Final Metal Product and Machinery Rule 34 5 A B C D E F G H I J Facility Data SID$ Discharge Sector Emp Size Flow Cat Weight Survey Type Subcat Flow Revenue Source 732 733 734 735 736 737 738 739 740 741 742 743 744 745 746 747 748 749 750 751 752 753 754 755 756 757 758 759 760 761 762 763 764 765 766 767 768 769 770 771 772 773 774 775 776 777 778 779 780 781 782 783 784 785 786 787 729 I Long M 730 D Phase 1 M 731 D Iron & Steel M 732 I Phase 1 M 733 I Long B 734 I Long M 735 I Short M 736 I Municipality MU 737 I Long M 738 I Long M 739 D Phase 1 U 740 I Phase 1 M 741 I Phase 1 M 742 I Iron & Steel M 743 D Municipality MU 744 I Municipality MU 745 I Long M 746 I Phase 1 M 747 I Phase 1 M 748 I Long M 749 I Phase 1 M 750 I Municipality MU 751 I Phase 1 B 752 I Phase 1 U 753 I Phase 1 U 754 I Municipality MU 755 I Long R 756 I Phase 1 M 757 I Long M 758 I Phase 1 M 759 I Long M 760 I Phase 1 M 761 D Rail R 762 I Long R 763 D Phase 1 U 764 I Phase 1 M 765 I Long M 766 I Long M 767 I Phase 1 M 768 I Long M 769 D Municipality MU 770 D Municipality MU 771 I Phase 1 M 772 I Short M 773 I Long R 774 I Phase 1 M 775 I Phase 1 M 776 I Iron & Steel M 777 D Phase 1 M 778 I Long M 779 I Long M 780 D Phase 1 U 781 I Long M 782 I Long M 783 D Municipality MU 784 I Long M February 14, 2003 Page 15 of 19 facdata_ July. xls  FacData Record for the Final Metal Product and Machinery Rule 34 5 A B C D E F G H I J Facility Data SID$ Discharge Sector Emp Size Flow Cat Weight Survey Type Subcat Flow Revenue Source 788 789 790 791 792 793 794 795 796 797 798 799 800 801 802 803 804 805 806 807 808 809 810 811 812 813 814 815 816 817 818 819 820 821 822 823 824 825 826 827 828 829 830 831 832 833 834 835 836 837 838 839 840 841 842 843 785 I Phase 1 M 786 I Long M 787 I Phase 1 M 788 I Long M 789 I Phase 1 M 790 I Phase 1 M 791 I Long U 792 I Long M 793 I Long M 794 I Municipality MU 795 I Long M 796 D Phase 1 U 797 I Phase 1 M 798 I Rail R 799 I Phase 1 M 800 I Phase 1 M 801 I Municipality MU 802 I Long M 803 I Municipality MU 804 I Short R 805 I Long M 806 I Long M 807 I Phase 1 M 808 I Phase 1 M 809 D Phase 1 M 810 I Municipality MU 811 D Long M 812 I Municipality MU 813 I Phase 1 M 814 I Phase 1 M 815 I Phase 1 M 816 I Phase 1 M 817 I Long B 818 D Short M 819 I Long M 820 I Long M 821 I Phase 1 M 822 I Long M 823 I Phase 1 M 824 I Phase 1 M 825 I Short M 826 I Municipality MU 827 I Municipality MU 828 D Municipality MU 829 I Phase 1 M 830 D Long M 831 I Phase 1 M 832 I Iron & Steel M 833 I Municipality MU 834 I Long M 835 D Rail R 836 I Phase 1 M 837 I Phase 1 M 838 I Iron & Steel M 839 D Long M 840 I Municipality MU February 14, 2003 Page 16 of 19 facdata_ July. xls  FacData Record for the Final Metal Product and Machinery Rule 34 5 A B C D E F G H I J Facility Data SID$ Discharge Sector Emp Size Flow Cat Weight Survey Type Subcat Flow Revenue Source 844 845 846 847 848 849 850 851 852 853 854 855 856 857 858 859 860 861 862 863 864 865 866 867 868 869 870 871 872 873 874 875 876 877 878 879 880 881 882 883 884 885 886 887 888 889 890 891 892 893 894 895 896 897 898 899 841 I Short B 842 I Short M 843 I Short R 844 D Short R 845 I Municipality MU 846 I Long M 847 I Municipality MU 848 I Long M 849 I Long M 850 I Phase 1 M 851 I Phase 1 M 852 D Rail R 853 I Phase 1 B 854 I Phase 1 M 855 I Phase 1 M 856 I Phase 1 M 857 I Phase 1 M 858 I Phase 1 B 859 I Phase 1 M 860 I Phase 1 B 861 I Phase 1 U 862 I Long M 863 I Short B 864 I Phase 1 M 865 I Iron & Steel M 866 I Long M 867 I Phase 1 B 868 D Municipality MU 869 I Long U 870 I Phase 1 M 871 D Phase 1 M 872 I Iron & Steel M 873 I Phase 1 M 874 I Phase 1 B 875 I Phase 1 B 876 D Iron & Steel M 877 I Municipality MU 878 D Municipality MU 879 I Long B 880 D Phase 1 U 881 I Rail R 882 I Municipality MU 883 D Municipality MU 884 I Long M 885 I Phase 1 M 886 I Phase 1 M 887 I Short B 888 I Short R 889 I Municipality MU 890 I Municipality MU 891 I Short B 892 I Municipality MU 893 I Municipality MU 894 I Short M 895 D Municipality MU 896 I Municipality MU February 14, 2003 Page 17 of 19 facdata_ July. xls  FacData Record for the Final Metal Product and Machinery Rule 34 5 A B C D E F G H I J Facility Data SID$ Discharge Sector Emp Size Flow Cat Weight Survey Type Subcat Flow Revenue Source 900 901 902 903 904 905 906 907 908 909 910 911 912 913 914 915 916 917 918 919 920 921 922 923 924 925 926 927 928 929 930 931 932 933 934 935 936 937 938 939 897 I Municipality MU 898 I Municipality MU 900 I Municipality MU 901 I Municipality MU 902 I Municipality MU 904 I Municipality MU 905 I Short R 906 D Municipality MU 907 I Municipality MU 908 I Municipality MU 909 I Municipality MU 910 I Municipality MU 911 I Municipality MU 912 I Municipality MU 913 I Municipality MU 914 I Municipality MU 915 I Municipality MU 916 D Municipality MU 917 I Municipality MU 918 I Short R 919 I Municipality MU 920 I Municipality MU 921 I Short R 922 I Short M 923 I Municipality MU 924 I Municipality MU 925 I Municipality MU 926 I Short R 927 I Short M 928 I Municipality MU 929 I Short R 930 I Short M 931 I Municipality MU 933 I Municipality MU 934 I Short M 935 I Municipality MU 936 I Municipality MU 937 I Municipality MU 938 D Municipality MU 939 I Municipality MU February 14, 2003 Page 18 of 19 facdata_ July. xls  FacData Record for the Final Metal Product and Machinery Rule 1 23456789 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 A B C 1 2 3 Flow Category Baseline SID$ Flow Flow Category 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 50 51 52 53 54 55 Note: All data except site identification not shown to protect confidential business information. Sample page provided to show structure of worksheet. February 14, 2003 Page 19 of 19 facdata_ July. xls  Flow


[Federal Register Volume 76, Number 244 (Tuesday, December 20, 2011)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Pages 78820-78823]
[FR Doc No: 2011-32485]

=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY

Coast Guard

33 CFR Part 165

[Docket No. USCG-2011-1112]
RIN 1625-AA00

Safety Zone; City of Beaufort's Tricentennial New Year's Eve
Fireworks Display, Beaufort River, Beaufort, SC

AGENCY: Coast Guard, DHS.

ACTION: Temporary final rule.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Coast Guard is establishing a temporary safety zone on the
Beaufort River, in Beaufort, South Carolina, during the City of
Beaufort's Tricentennial New Year's Eve Fireworks Display. The safety
zone is necessary to protect the public from the hazards associated
with launching fireworks over navigable waters of the United States.
Persons and vessels are prohibited from entering, transiting through,
anchoring in, or remaining within the safety zone unless authorized by
the Captain of the Port Charleston or a designated representative.

DATES: This rule is effective from 5:30 p.m. until 6:50 p.m. on
December 31, 2011.

ADDRESSES: Documents indicated in this preamble as being available in
the docket are part of docket USCG-2011-1112 and are available online
by going to http://www.regulations.gov, inserting USCG-2011-1112 in the
``Keyword'' box, and then clicking ``Search.'' They are also available
for inspection or copying at the Docket Management Facility (M-30),
U.S. Department of Transportation, West Building Ground Floor, Room
W12-140, 1200 New Jersey Avenue SE., Washington, DC 20590, between 9
a.m. and 5 p.m., Monday through Friday, except Federal holidays.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: If you have questions on this
temporary final rule, call or email Ensign John

Santorum, Sector Charleston Office of Waterways Management, Coast
Guard; telephone<PHONE_NUMBER>, email<EMAIL_ADDRESS>If you
have questions on viewing the docket, call Renee V. Wright, Program
Manager, Docket Operations, telephone<PHONE_NUMBER>.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

Regulatory Information

    The Coast Guard is issuing this temporary final rule without prior
notice and opportunity to comment pursuant to authority under section
4(a) of the Administrative Procedure Act (APA) (5 U.S.C. 553(b)). This
provision authorizes an agency to issue a rule without prior notice and
opportunity to comment when the agency for good cause finds that those
procedures are ``impracticable, unnecessary, or contrary to the public
interest.'' Under 5 U.S.C. 553(b)(B), the Coast Guard finds that good
cause exists for not publishing a notice of proposed rulemaking (NPRM)
with respect to this rule because the Coast Guard did not receive
notice of the fireworks display until December 1, 2011. As a result,
the Coast Guard did not have sufficient time to publish an NPRM and to
receive public comments prior to the fireworks display. Any delay in
the effective date of this rule would be contrary to the public
interest because immediate action is needed to minimize potential
danger to the public during the fireworks display.
    For the same reason discussed above, under 5 U.S.C. 553(d)(3) the
Coast Guard finds that good cause exists for making this rule effective
less than 30 days after publication in the Federal Register.

Basis and Purpose

    The legal basis for the rule is the Coast Guard's authority to
establish regulated navigation areas and other limited access areas: 33
U.S.C. 1231; 46 U.S.C. chapter 701, 3306, 3703; 50 U.S.C. 191, 195; 33
CFR 1.05-1, 6.04-1, 6.04-6, 160.5; Public Law 107-295, 116 Stat. 2064;
Department of Homeland Security Delegation No. 0170.1.
    The purpose of the rule is to protect the public from the hazards
associated with launching fireworks over navigable waters of the United
States.

Discussion of Rule

    On New Year's Eve, a fireworks display will be held in Beaufort,
South Carolina. The fireworks will be launched from a barge, which will
be located on the Beaufort River. The fireworks will explode over the
Beaufort River. The fireworks display is scheduled to commence at 6
p.m. and conclude at 6:20 p.m.
    The temporary safety zone encompasses certain waters of the
Beaufort River in Beaufort, South Carolina. The safety zone will be
enforced from 5:30 p.m. on December 31, 2011, 30 minutes prior to the
scheduled commencement of the fireworks display at approximately 6
p.m., to ensure the safety zone is clear of persons and vessels.
Enforcement of the safety zone will cease at 6:50 p.m. on December 31,
2011, 30 minutes after the scheduled conclusion of the fireworks
display, to account for possible delays. Persons and vessels are
prohibited from entering, transiting through, anchoring in, or
remaining within the safety zone unless authorized by the Captain of
the Port Charleston or a designated representative. Persons and vessels
desiring to enter, transit through, anchor in, or remain within the
safety zone may contact the Captain of the Port Charleston by telephone
at<PHONE_NUMBER>, or a designated representative via VHF radio on
channel 16, to request authorization. If authorization to enter,
transit through, anchor in, or remain within the safety zone is granted
by the Captain of the Port Charleston or a designated representative,
all persons and vessels receiving such authorization must comply with
the instructions of the Captain of the Port Charleston or a designated
representative. The Coast Guard will provide notice of the safety zone
by Local Notice to Mariners, Broadcast Notice to Mariners, and on-scene
designated representatives.

Regulatory Analyses

    We developed this rule after considering numerous statutes and
executive orders related to rulemaking. Below we summarize our analyses
based on 13 of these statutes or executive orders.

Regulatory Planning and Review

    Executive Orders 13563, Improving Regulation and Regulatory Review,
and 12866, Regulatory Planning and Review, direct agencies to assess
the costs and benefits of available regulatory alternatives and, if
regulation is necessary, to select regulatory approaches that maximize
net benefits (including potential economic, environmental, public
health and safety effects, distributive impacts, and equity). Executive
Order 13563 emphasizes the importance of quantifying both costs and
benefits, of reducing costs, of harmonizing rules, and of promoting
flexibility. This rule has not been designated a significant regulatory
action under section 3(f) of Executive Order 12866. Accordingly, the
Office of Management and Budget has not reviewed this regulation under
Executive Order 12866.
    The economic impact of this rule is not significant for the
following reasons: (1) The safety zone will be enforced for only one
hour and twenty minutes; (2) although persons and vessels will not be
able to enter, transit through, anchor in, or remain within the safety
zone without authorization from the Captain of the Port Charleston or a
designated representative, they may operate in the surrounding area
during the enforcement period; (3) persons and vessels may still enter,
transit through, anchor in, or remain within the safety zone if
authorized by the Captain of the Port Charleston or a designated
representative; and (4) the Coast Guard will provide advance
notification of the safety zone to the local maritime community by
Local Notice to Mariners and Broadcast Notice to Mariners.

Small Entities

    Under the Regulatory Flexibility Act (5 U.S.C. 601-612), we have
considered whether this rule would have a significant economic impact
on a substantial number of small entities. The term ``small entities''
comprises small businesses, not-for-profit organizations that are
independently owned and operated and are not dominant in their fields,
and governmental jurisdictions with populations of less than 50,000.
    The Coast Guard certifies under 5 U.S.C. 605(b) that this rule will
not have a significant economic impact on a substantial number of small
entities. This rule may affect the following entities, some of which
may be small entities: the owners or operators of vessels intending to
enter, transit through, anchor in, or remain within that portion of the
Beaufort River encompassed within the safety zone from 5:30 p.m. until
6:50 p.m. on December 31, 2011. For the reasons discussed in the
Regulatory Planning and Review section above, this rule will not have a
significant economic impact on a substantial number of small entities.

Assistance for Small Entities

    Under section 213(a) of the Small Business Regulatory Enforcement
Fairness Act of 1996 (Pub. L. 104-121), we offer to assist small
entities in understanding the rule so that they can better evaluate its
effects on them and participate in the rulemaking process.
    Small businesses may send comments on the actions of Federal
employees who enforce, or otherwise determine

compliance with, Federal regulations to the Small Business and
Agriculture Regulatory Enforcement Ombudsman and the Regional Small
Business Regulatory Fairness Boards. The Ombudsman evaluates these
actions annually and rates each agency's responsiveness to small
business. If you wish to comment on actions by employees of the Coast
Guard, call 1-888-REG-FAIR (1-(888) 734-3247). The Coast Guard will not
retaliate against small entities that question or complain about this
rule or any policy or action of the Coast Guard.

Collection of Information

    This rule calls for no new collection of information under the
Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 (44 U.S.C. 3501-3520).

Federalism

    A rule has implications for federalism under Executive Order 13132,
Federalism, if it has a substantial direct effect on State or local
governments and would either preempt State law or impose a substantial
direct cost of compliance on them. We have analyzed this rule under
that Order and have determined that it does not have implications for
federalism.

Unfunded Mandates Reform Act

    The Unfunded Mandates Reform Act of 1995 (2 U.S.C. 1531-1538)
requires Federal agencies to assess the effects of their discretionary
regulatory actions. In particular, the Act addresses actions that may
result in the expenditure by a State, local, or Tribal government, in
the aggregate, or by the private sector of $100,000,000 or more in any
one year. Though this rule will not result in such an expenditure, we
do discuss the effects of this rule elsewhere in this preamble.

Taking of Private Property

    This rule will not effect a taking of private property or otherwise
have taking implications under Executive Order 12630, Governmental
Actions and Interference with Constitutionally Protected Property
Rights.

Civil Justice Reform

    This rule meets applicable standards in sections 3(a) and 3(b)(2)
of Executive Order 12988, Civil Justice Reform, to minimize litigation,
eliminate ambiguity, and reduce burden.

Protection of Children

    We have analyzed this rule under Executive Order 13045, Protection
of Children from Environmental Health Risks and Safety Risks. This rule
is not an economically significant rule and does not create an
environmental risk to health or risk to safety that may
disproportionately affect children.

Indian Tribal Governments

    This rule does not have Tribal implications under Executive Order
13175, Consultation and Coordination with Indian Tribal Governments,
because it does not have a substantial direct effect on one or more
Indian Tribes, on the relationship between the Federal Government and
Indian Tribes, or on the distribution of power and responsibilities
between the Federal Government and Indian Tribes.

Energy Effects

    We have analyzed this rule under Executive Order 13211, Actions
Concerning Regulations That Significantly Affect Energy Supply,
Distribution, or Use. We have determined that it is not a ``significant
energy action'' under that order because it is not a ``significant
regulatory action'' under Executive Order 12866 and is not likely to
have a significant adverse effect on the supply, distribution, or use
of energy. The Administrator of the Office of Information and
Regulatory Affairs has not designated it as a significant energy
action. Therefore, it does not require a Statement of Energy Effects
under Executive Order 13211.

Technical Standards

    The National Technology Transfer and Advancement Act (NTTAA) (15
U.S.C. 272 note) directs agencies to use voluntary consensus standards
in their regulatory activities unless the agency provides Congress,
through the Office of Management and Budget, with an explanation of why
using these standards would be inconsistent with applicable law or
otherwise impractical. Voluntary consensus standards are technical
standards (e.g., specifications of materials, performance, design, or
operation; test methods; sampling procedures; and related management
systems practices) that are developed or adopted by voluntary consensus
standards bodies.
    This rule does not use technical standards. Therefore, we did not
consider the use of voluntary consensus standards.

Environment

    We have analyzed this rule under Department of Homeland Security
Management Directive 023-01 and Commandant Instruction M16475.lD, which
guide the Coast Guard in complying with the National Environmental
Policy Act of 1969 (NEPA) (42 U.S.C. 4321-4370f), and have concluded
this action is one of a category of actions that do not individually or
cumulatively have a significant effect on the human environment. This
rule is categorically excluded, under figure 2-1, paragraph (34)(g), of
the Instruction. This rule involves establishing a temporary safety
zone that will be enforced for a total of one hour and twenty minutes.
An environmental analysis checklist and a categorical exclusion
determination are available in the docket where indicated under
ADDRESSES.

List of Subjects in 33 CFR Part 165

    Harbors, Marine safety, Navigation (water), Reporting and
recordkeeping requirements, Security measures, Waterways.

    For the reasons discussed in the preamble, the Coast Guard amends
33 CFR part 165 as follows:

PART 165--REGULATED NAVIGATION AREAS AND LIMITED ACCESS AREAS

0
1. The authority citation for part 165 continues to read as follows:

    Authority: 33 U.S.C. 1231; 46 U.S.C. Chapter 701, 3306, 3703; 50
U.S.C. 191, 195; 33 CFR 1.05-1, 6.04-1, 6.04-6, 160.5; Pub. L. 107-
295, 116 Stat. 2064; Department of Homeland Security Delegation No.
0170.1.

0
2. Add a temporary Sec.  165.T07-1112 to read as follows:

Sec.  165.T07-1112  Safety Zone; City of Beaufort's Tricentennial New
Year's Eve Fireworks Display, Beaufort River, Beaufort, SC.

    (a) Regulated Area. The following regulated area is a safety zone:
all waters of the Beaufort River within a 500 yard radius of position
32[deg]25'40'' N, 80[deg]40'23'' W. All coordinates are North American
Datum 1983.
    (b) Definition. The term ``designated representative'' means Coast
Guard Patrol Commanders, including Coast Guard coxswains, petty
officers, and other officers operating Coast Guard vessels, and
Federal, state, and local officers designated by or assisting the
Captain of the Port Charleston in the enforcement of the regulated
area.
    (c) Regulations.
    (1) All persons and vessels are prohibited from entering,
transiting through, anchoring in, or remaining within the regulated
area unless authorized by the Captain of the Port Charleston or a
designated representative.
    (2) Persons and vessels desiring to enter, transit through, anchor
in, or remain within the regulated area may contact the Captain of the
Port

Charleston by telephone at<PHONE_NUMBER>, or a designated
representative via VHF radio on channel 16, to request authorization.
If authorization to enter, transit through, anchor in, or remain within
the regulated area is granted by the Captain of the Port Charleston or
a designated representative, all persons and vessels receiving such
authorization must comply with the instructions of the Captain of the
Port Charleston or a designated representative.
    (3) The Coast Guard will provide notice of the regulated area by
Local Notice to Mariners, Broadcast Notice to Mariners, and on-scene
designated representatives.
    (d) Effective Date. This rule is effective from 5:30 p.m. until
6:50 p.m. on December 31, 2011.

    Dated: December 9, 2011.
M.F. White,
Captain, U.S. Coast Guard, Captain of the Port Charleston.
[FR Doc. 2011-32485 Filed 12-19-11; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 9110-04-P


[Federal Register Volume 81, Number 32 (Thursday, February 18, 2016)]
[Notices]
[Pages 8185-8186]
[FR Doc No: 2016-03310]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission

Combined Notice of Filings

    Take notice that the Commission has received the following Natural
Gas Pipeline Rate and Refund Report filings:

Filings Instituting Proceedings

    Docket Numbers: PR16-14-000.
    Applicants: NorthWestern Corporation.
    Description: Tariff filing per 284.123(b)(1),: Revised Rate
Schedules for Transportation and Storage Service to be effective 1/1/
2016; Filing Type: 1000.
    Filed Date: 1/27/16.
    Accession Number:<PHONE_NUMBER>51.
    Comments/Protests Due: 5 p.m. ET 2/17/16.

    Docket Numbers: PR16-15-000.
    Applicants: Columbia Gas of Maryland, Inc.
    Description: Tariff filing per 284.123(b)(1)/.: CMD SOC 1-28-2016
to be effective 1/1/2016; Filing Type: 980.
    Filed Date: 1/28/16.
    Accession Number:<PHONE_NUMBER>20.
    Comments/Protests Due: 5 p.m. ET 2/18/16.

    Docket Numbers: PR16-16-000.
    Applicants: Public Service Company of Colorado.
    Description: Tariff filing per 284.123(b)(1)/.: 20160128_PSCo SOR
Eff 1-1-16 to be effective 1/1/2016; Filing Type: 980.
    Filed Date: 1/28/16.
    Accession Number:<PHONE_NUMBER>36.
    Comments/Protests Due: 5 p.m. ET 2/18/16.
    Docket Number: PR16-17-000.
    Applicants: Acadian Gas Pipeline System.
    Description: Tariff filing per 284.123(e) + (g): SOC Update per
NAESB Nomination Timeline Language Requirement/FERC Order 809 to be
effective 4/1/2016; Filing Type: 1280.
    Filed Date: 1/28/2016.
    Accession Number:<PHONE_NUMBER>48.
    Comments Due: 5 p.m. ET 2/18/16.
    284.123(g) Protests Due: 5 p.m. ET 3/28/16.
    Docket Number: PR16-18-000.
    Applicants: Cypress Gas Pipeline, LLC.
    Description: Tariff filing per 284.123(e) + (g): SOC Update per
NAESB Nomination Timeline Language Requirement/FERC Order 809 to be
effective 4/1/2016; Filing Type: 1280.
    Filed Date: 1/28/2016.
    Accession Number:<PHONE_NUMBER>51.
    Comments Due: 5 p.m. ET 2/18/16.
    284.123(g) Protests Due: 5 p.m. ET 3/28/16.

    Docket Numbers: PR16-19-000.
    Applicants: Southern California Gas Company.
    Description: Tariff filing per 284.123(b)(1)/.: Revision of
Statement of Rates to be effective 1/28/2016; Filing Type: 980.
    Filed Date: 1/29/16.
    Accession Number:<PHONE_NUMBER>26.
    Comments/Protests Due: 5 p.m. ET 2/19/16.
    Docket Number: PR16-20-000.
    Applicants: Enterprise Texas Pipeline LLC.
    Description: Tariff filing per 284.123(e) + (g): SOC Update per
NAESB Nomination Timeline Language Requirement/FERC Order 809 to be
effective 4/1/2016; Filing Type: 1280.
    Filed Date: 1/29/2016.
    Accession Number:<PHONE_NUMBER>47.
    Comments Due: 5 p.m. ET 2/19/16.
    284.123(g) Protests Due: 5 p.m. ET 3/29/16.

    Docket Numbers: PR16-21-000.
    Applicants: Jefferson Island Storage & Hub, L.L.C.
    Description: Tariff filing per 284.123(e)/.224: JISH Revised
Statement of Operating Terms and Conditions, Version 3.0.0 to be
effective 4/1/2016; Filing Type: 770.
    Filed Date: 1/29/16.
    Accession Number:<PHONE_NUMBER>67.
    Comments/Protests Due: 5 p.m. ET 2/19/16.

    Docket Numbers: PR16-22-000.

    Applicants: Columbia Gas of Ohio, Inc.
    Description: Tariff filing per 284.123(b)(1)/.: COH SOC 1-29-2016
to be effective 12/31/2015; Filing Type: 980.
    Filed Date: 1/29/16.
    Accession Number:<PHONE_NUMBER>78.
    Comments/Protests Due: 5 p.m. ET 2/19/16.
    Docket Number: PR16-23-000.
    Applicants: Enterprise Intrastate LLC.
    Description: Tariff filing per 284.123(e) + (g): SOC Update per
NAESB Nomination Timeline Language Requirement/FERC Order 809 to be
effective 4/1/2016; Filing Type: 1280.
    Filed Date: 1/29/2016.
    Accession Number:<PHONE_NUMBER>46.
    Comments Due: 5 p.m. ET 2/19/16.
    284.123(g) Protests Due: 5 p.m. ET 3/29/16.

    Docket Numbers: PR16-24-000.
    Applicants: Bay Gas Storage Company, Ltd.
    Description: Tariff filing per 284.123/.224: Bay Gas Storage
Company, Ltd. FERC Order No. 809 Compliance Filing to be effective 4/1/
2016; Filing Type: 790.
    Filed Date: 1/29/16.
    Accession Number:<PHONE_NUMBER>85.
    Comments/Protests Due: 5 p.m. ET 2/19/16.

    Docket Numbers: RP16-587-000.
    Applicants: Vector Pipeline L.P.
    Description: Section 4(d) Rate Filing: Negotiated Rate Filing--
Union Gas Limited to be effective 4/1/2016.
    Filed Date: 2/5/16.
    Accession Number: 20160205-5021.
    Comments Due: 5 p.m. ET 2/17/16.

    Docket Numbers: RP16-588-000.
    Applicants: Midcontinent Express Pipeline LLC.
    Description: Section 4(d) Rate Filing: Clean Up Filing to be
effective 3/7/2016.
    Filed Date: 2/5/16.
    Accession Number: 20160205-5056.
    Comments Due: 5 p.m. ET 2/17/16.

    Docket Numbers: RP16-589-000.
    Applicants: Kinder Morgan Louisiana Pipeline LLC.
    Description: Section 4(d) Rate Filing: Clean Up Filing to be
effective 3/7/2016.
    Filed Date: 2/5/16.
    Accession Number: 20160205-5063.
    Comments Due: 5 p.m. ET 2/17/16.

    Docket Numbers: RP16-590-000.
    Applicants: National Fuel Gas Supply Corporation.
    Description: Section 4(d) Rate Filing: GT&C Section 15 Correction
to be effective 10/1/2015.
    Filed Date: 2/5/16.
    Accession Number: 20160205-5151.
    Comments Due: 5 p.m. ET 2/17/16.

    Docket Numbers: RP16-591-000.
    Applicants: Monroe Gas Storage Company, LLC.
    Description: Petition for Declaratory Order of Monroe Gas Storage
Company, LLC under RP16-591.Filed Date: 2/5/16.
    Accession Number: 20160205-5245.
    Comments Due: 5 p.m. ET 2/17/16.
    Any person desiring to intervene or protest in any of the above
proceedings must file in accordance with Rules 211 and 214 of the
Commission's Regulations (18 CFR 385.211 and 385.214) on or before 5:00
p.m. Eastern time on the specified date(s). Protests may be considered,
but intervention is necessary to become a party to the proceeding.

Filings in Existing Proceedings

    Docket Numbers: RP16-505-001.
    Applicants: Portland General Electric Company.
    Description: Compliance filing NAESB V3 Standards Compliance Filing
Correction to be effective 4/1/2016.
    Filed Date: 2/5/16.
    Accession Number: 20160205-5150.
    Comments Due: 5 p.m. ET 2/17/16.

    Any person desiring to protest in any of the above proceedings must
file in accordance with Rule 211 of the Commission's Regulations (18
CFR 385.211) on or before 5:00 p.m. Eastern time on the specified
comment date.
    The filings are accessible in the Commission's eLibrary system by
clicking on the links or querying the docket number.
    eFiling is encouraged. More detailed information relating to filing
requirements, interventions, protests, service, and qualifying
facilities filings can be found at: http://www.ferc.gov/docs-filing/efiling/filing-req.pdf. For other information, call<PHONE_NUMBER>
(toll free). For TTY, call<PHONE_NUMBER>.

    Dated: February 8, 2016.
Nathaniel J. Davis, Sr.,
Deputy Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2016-03310 Filed 2-17-16; 8:45 am]
 BILLING CODE 6717-01-P


[Federal Register Volume 76, Number 216 (Tuesday, November 8, 2011)]
[Notices]
[Pages 69258-69260]
[FR Doc No: 2011-28871]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission

Combined Notice of Filings 1

    Take notice that the Commission received the following exempt
wholesale generator filings:

    Docket Numbers: EG11-117-000.
    Applicants: Louisiana Generating LLC.
    Description: Louisiana Generating LLC's Amendment of Notice of
Self-Certification of Exempt Wholesale Generator Status.
    Filed Date: 10/13/2011.
    Accession Number: 20111013-5167.
    Comment Date: 5 p.m. Eastern Time on Thursday, November 03, 2011.

    Docket Numbers: EG12-6-000.
    Applicants: Coram California Development, L.P.
    Description: Coram California Development, L.P. Notice of Self-
Certification of Exempt Wholesale Generator Status.
    Filed Date: 10/28/2011.
    Accession Number: 20111028-5115.
    Comment Date: 5 p.m. Eastern Time on Friday, November 18, 2011.

    Take notice that the Commission received the following electric
rate filings:

    Docket Numbers: ER11-3384-002.
    Applicants: PJM Interconnection, L.L.C.
    Description: PJM Interconnection, L.L.C. submits tariff filing per
35: Compliance filing in ER11-3384 per Order dated October 6, 2011 to
be effective 4/16/2011.
    Filed Date: 10/28/2011.
    Accession Number: 20111028-5084.
    Comment Date: 5 p.m. Eastern Time on Friday, November 18, 2011.

    Docket Numbers: ER11-4160-000.
    Applicants: ITC Midwest LLC.
    Description: ITC Midwest LLC submits tariff filing per 35.19a(b):
Filing of a Refund Report to be effective N/A.
    Filed Date: 10/28/2011.
    Accession Number: 20111028-5119.
    Comment Date: 5 p.m. Eastern Time on Friday, November 18, 2011.

    Docket Numbers: ER11-4374-001.
    Applicants: Portland General Electric Company.
    Description: Portland General Electric Company submits tariff
filing per 35.17(b): Volume 12 Amendment Filing to be effective 10/24/
2011.
    Filed Date: 10/28/2011.
    Accession Number: 20111028-5101.
    Comment Date: 5 p.m. Eastern Time on Friday, November 18, 2011.

    Docket Numbers: ER12-229-000.

    Applicants: ISO New England Inc.
    Description: ISO New England Inc. submits tariff filing per
35.13(a)(2)(iii: OATT Related to the Capacity Cost Rate Component to be
effective 1/1/2012.
    Filed Date: 10/28/2011.
    Accession Number: 20111028-5053.
    Comment Date: 5 p.m. Eastern Time on Friday, November 18, 2011.

    Docket Numbers: ER12-230-000.
    Applicants: Wisconsin Public Service Corporation.
    Description: Wisconsin Public Service Corporation submits tariff
filing per 35.15: Cancellation of Manitowoc Service Agreement under the
W-2A Tariff to be effective 1/1/2012.
    Filed Date: 10/28/2011.
    Accession Number: 20111028-5054.
    Comment Date: 5 p.m. Eastern Time on Friday, November 18, 2011.

    Docket Numbers: ER12-231-000.
    Applicants: Wisconsin Public Service Corporation.
    Description: Wisconsin Public Service Corporation submits tariff
filing per 35.13(a)(2)(iii: Revised UPPCO Service Agreement Under W-2A
Tariff to be effective 1/1/2012.
    Filed Date: 10/28/2011.
    Accession Number: 20111028-5055.
    Comment Date: 5 p.m. Eastern Time on Friday, November 18, 2011.

    Docket Numbers: ER12-232-000.
    Applicants: Northern States Power Company, a Wisconsin corporation
    Description: Northern States Power Company, a Wisconsin corporation
submits tariff filing per 35.13(a)(2)(iii: 2011--10-28--NSPW--DPC E&P
Agrmt-314 to be effective 7/30/2010.
    Filed Date: 10/28/2011.
    Accession Number: 20111028-5087.
    Comment Date: 5 p.m. Eastern Time on Friday, November 18, 2011.

    Docket Numbers: ER12-232-001.
    Applicants: Northern States Power Company, a Wisconsin corporation
    Description: Northern States Power Company, a Wisconsin corporation
submits tariff filing per 35.17(b): 2011--10-28--NSPW-DPC E&P Agrmt--
314-2 to be effective 3/31/2011.
    Filed Date: 10/28/2011.
    Accession Number: 20111028-5178.
    Comment Date: 5 p.m. Eastern Time on Friday, November 18, 2011.

    Docket Numbers: ER12-233-000.
    Applicants: Wolverine Power Supply Cooperative, Inc.
    Description: Wolverine Power Supply Cooperative, Inc. submits
tariff filing per 35.13(a)(2)(iii: Amended and Restated Wholesale Power
Contract with Midwest Energy Cooperative to be effective 12/31/9998.
    Filed Date: 10/28/2011.
    Accession Number: 20111028-5118.
    Comment Date: 5 p.m. Eastern Time on Friday, November 18, 2011.

    Docket Numbers: ER12-234-000.
    Applicants: Pacific Gas and Electric Company.
    Description: Pacific Gas and Electric Company submits tariff filing
per 35.15: Notices of Termination for the Cantua and Giffen E&P
Agreements to be effective 9/26/2011.
    Filed Date: 10/28/2011.
    Accession Number: 20111028-5128.
    Comment Date: 5 p.m. Eastern Time on Friday, November 18, 2011.

    Docket Numbers: ER12-235-000.
    Applicants: Southwest Power Pool, Inc.
    Description: Southwest Power Pool, Inc. submits tariff filing per
35.13(a)(2)(iii: Revisions to Attachment AE Locational Imbalance Price
Corrections to be effective 12/28/2011.
    Filed Date: 10/28/2011.
    Accession Number: 20111028-5129.
    Comment Date: 5 p.m. Eastern Time on Friday, November 18, 2011.

    Docket Numbers: ER12-236-000.
    Applicants: Southern California Edison Company.
    Description: Southern California Edison Company submits tariff
filing per 35.13(a)(1): 2012 TRBAA Update Filing to be effective 1/1/
2012.
    Filed Date: 10/28/2011
    Accession Number: 20111028-5131.
    Comment Date: 5 p.m. Eastern Time on Friday, November 18, 2011.

    Docket Numbers: ER12-237-000.
    Applicants: PJM Interconnection, L.L.C.
    Description: PJM Interconnection, L.L.C. submits tariff filing per
35.13(a)(2)(iii: Revisions to PJM's OA Section 7.5.1 re the conduct of
the Finance Committee to be effective 1/1/2012.
    Filed Date: 10/28/2011.
    Accession Number: 20111028-5142.
    Comment Date: 5 p.m. Eastern Time on Friday, November 18, 2011.

    Docket Numbers: ER12-238-000.
    Applicants: PPL Energy Supply, LLC.
    Description: PPL Energy Supply, LLC submits tariff filing per
35.15: Cancellation of October 24, 2011 Filing to be effective 10/28/
2011.
    Filed Date: 10/28/2011.
    Accession Number: 20111028-5148.
    Comment Date: 5 p.m. Eastern Time on Friday, November 18, 2011.

    Docket Numbers: ER12-239-000.
    Applicants: Southern California Edison Company.
    Description: Abandonment of the Arizona Segment of DPV2 Filing of
Southern California Edison Company.
    Filed Date: 10/28/2011.
    Accession Number: 20111028-5153.
    Comment Date: 5 p.m. Eastern Time on Friday, November 18, 2011.

    Docket Numbers: ER12-240-000.
    Applicants: PPL Energy Supply, LLC.
    Description: PPL Energy Supply, LLC submits tariff filing per
35.12: Market-Based Rate Application of PPL Energy Supply, LLC to be
effective 11/29/2011.
    Filed Date: 10/28/2011.
    Accession Number: 20111028-5167.
    Comment Date: 5 p.m. Eastern Time on Friday, November 18, 2011.

    Docket Numbers: ER12-241-000.
    Applicants: PJM Interconnection, L.L.C.
    Description: Report of PJM Interconnection, L.L.C. PJM submits for
filing the initial allocation of Financial Transmission Rights for Duke
Energy Ohio and Duke Energy Kentucky for period January 1, 2012 through
May 31, 2012.
    Filed Date: 10/28/2011.
    Accession Number: 20111028-5172.
    Comment Date: 5 p.m. Eastern Time on Friday, November 18, 2011.

    Docket Numbers: ER12-242-000.
    Applicants: MidAmerican Energy Company, Midwest Independent
Transmission System Operator, Inc.
    Description: MidAmerican Energy Company submits tariff filing per
35.13(a)(2)(iii: 10-28-11 MidAmerican Attachment O to be effective 1/1/
2012.
    Filed Date: 10/28/2011.
    Accession Number: 20111028-5177.
    Comment Date: 5 p.m. Eastern Time on Friday, November 18, 2011.

    Take notice that the Commission received the following land
acquisition reports:

    Docket Numbers: LA11-3-000.
    Applicants: Niagara Generation, LLC.
    Description: Land Acquisition Report (3Q 2011).
    Filed Date: 10/28/2011.
    Accession Number: 20111028-5074.
    Comment Date: 5 p.m. Eastern Time on Friday, November 18, 2011.

    Docket Numbers: LA11-3-000.
    Applicants: Spring Canyon Energy LLC, Judith Gap Energy LLC,
Invenergy TN LLC, Wolverine Creek Energy LLC, Grays Harbor Energy LLC,
Forward Energy LLC, Grand Ridge Energy LLC, Willow Creek Energy LLC,
Sheldon Energy LLC, Hardee Power Partners Limited, Spindle Hill Energy
LLC, Invenergy Cannon Falls, LLC, Beech Ridge Energy LLC, Grand Ridge
Energy II LLC, Grand Ridge Energy III LLC, Grand Ridge Energy IV LLC,
Grand Ridge Energy V LLC, Vantage Wind Energy LLC, Stony Creek Energy
LLC, Gratiot County Wind LLC, Gratiot County Wind II LLC.

    Description: Generation Site Report Third Quarter 2011 of Spring
Canyon Energy LLC, et al.
    Filed Date: 10/28/2011.
    Accession Number: 20111028-5109.
    Comment Date: 5 p.m. Eastern Time on Friday, November 18, 2011.

    Docket Numbers: LA11-3-000.
    Applicants: High Prairie Wind Farm II, LLC, Lost Lakes Wind Farm
LLC, Pioneer Prairie Wind Farm I, LLC, Rail Splitter Wind Farm, LLC.
    Description: Land Acquisition Report of High Prairie Wind Farm II,
LLC, et al.
    Filed Date: 10/28/2011.
    Accession Number: 20111028-5146.
    Comment Date: 5 p.m. Eastern Time on Friday, November 18, 2011.

    The filings are accessible in the Commission's eLibrary system by
clicking on the links or querying the docket number.
    Any person desiring to intervene or protest in any of the above
proceedings must file in accordance with Rules 211 and 214 of the
Commission's Regulations (18 CFR 385.211 and 385.214) on or before 5
p.m. Eastern time on the specified comment date. Protests may be
considered, but intervention is necessary to become a party to the
proceeding.
    eFiling is encouraged. More detailed information relating to filing
requirements, interventions, protests, service, and qualifying
facilities filings can be found at: http://www.ferc.gov/docs-filing/efiling/filing-req.pdf. For other information, call<PHONE_NUMBER>
(toll free). For TTY, call<PHONE_NUMBER>.

    Dated: October 31, 2011.
Nathaniel J. Davis, Sr.,
Deputy Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2011-28871 Filed 11-7-11; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6717-01-P


San Juan County, New Mexico Early Action Compact for Ozone Clean Air Action Plan March 2004 Prepared by: New Mexico Environment Department, Air Quality Bureau City of Aztec, New Mexico City of Bloomfield, New Mexico City of Farmington, New Mexico San Juan County, New Mexico Submitted to: United States Environmental Protection Agency, Region 6 ii TABLE OF CONTENTS LIST OF ACRONYMS .................................................................................................... III 1. INTRODUCTION............................................................................................... 1 2. OZONE IN SAN JUAN COUNTY................................................................. 2 2.1 NATIONAL OZONE STANDARDS............................................................................... 2 2.2 OZONE MONITORING IN SAN JUAN COUNTY............................................................ 2 2.3 THE 1 HOUR OZONE STANDARD IN NORTHWESTERN NEW MEXICO......................... 2 2.4 THE 8 HOUR OZONE STANDARD IN NORTHWESTERN NEW MEXICO......................... 2 2.5 NONATTAINMENT AREAS........................................................................................ 3 3. SAN JUAN COUNTY EARLY ACTION COMPACT FOR OZONE 4 3.1 EARLY ACTION COMPACT PROTOCOL ..................................................................... 4 3.2 SAN JUAN COUNTY EARLY ACTION COMPACT ........................................................ 5 3.2.1 Reporting........................................................................................................ 6 3.2.2 Emissions Inventories ..................................................................................... 6 3.2.3 Photochemical Modeling ................................................................................ 6 3.2.4 Maintenance for Growth and Future Growth Scenarios .................................. 6 3.2.5 Public Involvement ......................................................................................... 6 3.3 SAN JUAN COUNTY EARLY ACTION COMPACT RESULTS .......................................... 7 4. CLEAN AIR ACTION PLAN COMPONENTS........................................ 8 4.1 STATE IMPLEMENTATION PLANS AND ENFORCEABLE CONTROL MEASURES ............. 8 4.2 PUBLIC OUTREACH CAMPAIGN ............................................................................... 8 4.2.1 Web Site.......................................................................................................... 8 4.2.2 Public Service Announcements ....................................................................... 9 4.2.3 Educational Outreach Materials For Children................................................ 9 4.3 VOLUNTARY PROGRAM FOR EMISSIONS CONTROLS................................................. 9 iii List of Acronyms CAA Clean Air Act CAAP Clean Air Action Plan EAC Early Action Compact EPA United States Environmental Protection Agency NAAQS National Ambient Air Quality Standards NMED New Mexico Environment Department NOx Nitrogen Oxides ppm parts per million PSA Public Service Announcement SIP State Implementation Plan VOC Volatile Organic Compounds 1 1. Introduction In December 2002, the New Mexico Environment Department ( NMED), the United States Environmental Protection Agency ( EPA), the Cities of Aztec, Bloomfield and Farmington, and San Juan County entered into a voluntary agreement to research and analyze air quality in northwestern New Mexico with respect to the 8 hour standard for ground level ozone. The agreement, known as the San Juan County Early Action Compact for ozone ( EAC), set forth a schedule for the development of technical information about the formation of ozone and the adoption and implementation of any necessary emissions control measures. The goal of the EAC is to ensure San Juan County's continued compliance with the 8 hour ozone standard through December 31, 2007.

This document, the San Juan County Clean Air Action Plan ( CAAP), is an important deliverable under the EAC. The CAAP synthesizes results of extensive ozone modeling into a discussion of measures to help San Juan County maintain attainment of the 8 hour ozone standard, while raising public awareness of the issue. The following sections describe the ground level ozone pollution situation in San Juan County, the EAC and its results, and components of the CAAP that will be implemented in San Juan County. 2 2. Ozone in San Juan County 2.1 National Ozone Standards The Federal Clean Air Act ( CAA) is the comprehensive law that regulates airborne emissions from area, mobile, and stationary sources nationwide. This law authorizes the EPA to establish National Ambient Air Quality Standards ( NAAQS) for several pollutants in order to protect public health and the environment. The EPA currently has two NAAQS for ozone: the 1 hour peak standard of 0.12 parts per million ( ppm) and the 8 hour standard of 0.08 ppm.

2.2 Ozone Monitoring in San Juan County The New Mexico Environment Department operates two continuous ozone monitors in San Juan County. The " Substation" ozone monitor is located west of Farmington and the " Bloomfield" monitor is located just north of Bloomfield. Ozone monitoring data is collected by NMED, submitted to EPA, and used to determine the status of air quality in the northwestern corner of New Mexico with respect to the ozone NAAQS.

2.3 The 1 Hour Ozone Standard in Northwestern New Mexico To meet this standard, an area must have a monitored hourly peak ozone concentration at or below 0.12 ppm. If an area exceeds the standard more than three times in three years, it is subject to a nonattainment designation. San Juan County has never exceeded the 1 hour ozone standard.

2.4 The 8 Hour Ozone Standard in Northwestern New Mexico During the past several years, 8 hour average ozone concentrations in San Juan County have approached the 8 hour ozone NAAQS of 0.08 ppm. The status of an area with respect to the 8 hour standard is determined by averaging the fourth highest 8 hour average ozone concentrations from each of the most recent three years. This number, called the design value, must be equal to or less than the standard concentration for an area to meet the standard. The Substation monitor's current design value ( averaging from the years 2001, 2002, and 2003) is 0.0747 ppm and the Bloomfield monitor's current design value is 0.0743 ppm. San Juan County has never exceeded the 8 hour ozone standard. Although San Juan County has always been and is currently in attainment of the 8 hour ozone standard, signatories to the San Juan County EAC will strive to continue to meet the terms of the EAC, which is described in detail in 3.2. Failure to meet the obligations of the EAC will result in immediate reversion to the traditional process of nonattainment designation, if the area's design value is violating the 8 hour NAAQS. 3 2.5 Nonattainment Areas Areas formally declared in violation of the NAAQS and areas contributing to a violation are designated " nonattainment areas." Nonattainment areas must meet certain Clean Air Act requirements, such as:

Transportation Conformity  Requires a demonstration that regional long range transportation plans will not negatively impact air quality, or federal transportation funds can be withheld.

New Source Review  Requires a review of new or modified industrial operations to minimize air pollution.

Rate of Progress Requirements  A certain percentage of pollutants must be reduced each year.

Specific attainment date  Consequences of failure to reach attainment by the specified date include stricter control measures and the potential for stiff penalties.

10 year maintenance plan  Includes additional or continuing mandatory programs for 10 years following redesignation to attainment.

Another requirement obligates the state to develop and implement a prescriptive, enforceable clean air plan that mandates how the area will come into compliance with the NAAQS that is exceeded. The enforceable clean air plan and revisions to it are known as the State Implementation Plan ( SIP). 4 3. San Juan County Early Action Compact for Ozone 3.1 Early Action Compact Protocol EPA developed the Protocol for Early Action Compacts ( EAC Protocol) during 2002. In exchange for relief from certain provisions of the nonattainment area requirements, the protocol establishes a two step process that offers a more expeditious time line for achieving the 8 hour ozone standard than expected under EPA's 8 hour ozone standard implementation rulemaking. In the case of San Juan County, the 8 hour ozone NAAQS is achieved, so following the EAC Protocol allowed the signatories to complete a technical modeling analysis that gives EAC signatories and local stakeholders a more comprehensive understanding of the issue and aims to keep the area within the standard. The principles of the EAC Protocol to be executed by local, state and EPA officials include the following:

Early planning, implementation, and emission reductions leading to expeditious attainment and maintenance of the 8 hour ozone standard;

Local area control of any measures to be employed, with broad based public input;

State support to ensure technical integrity of the Clean Air Action Plan;

If necessary, formal incorporation of the Clean Air Action Plan into the State Implementation Plan ( SIP);

Deferral of the effective date of nonattainment designation and related requirements, if applicable, as long as all terms and milestones are met; and

Safeguards to return areas to traditional nonattainment SIP requirements should terms and/ or milestones go unfulfilled, with appropriate credit given for emission reduction measures already implemented.

When EPA's 8 hour implementation guidelines call for designations, EPA will defer the effective date of any nonattainment designation and related requirements for participating areas that fail to meet the 8 hour ozone standard as long as all terms and milestones of the EAC are being met. If the nonattainment designation is deferred, EPA will move expeditiously to designate the area as attainment and impose no additional requirements, provided that the monitors in the area reflect attainment by December 31, 2007.

If at any time the area does not meet all terms of the EAC, including agreed upon milestones, then the area will forfeit participation and attainment or nonattainment designation ( or redesignation if necessary) will become effective. The EPA will offer such an area no delays, exemptions or other favorable treatment because of the area's previous participation in this program.

If an area violates the 8 hour ozone standard as of December 31, 2007, and an area has had the effective date of any nonattainment designation deferred, such nonattainment designation will become effective. The State must then submit a revised attainment demonstration SIP revision according to the Clean Air Act and EPA's 8 hour implementation rule, unless the 8 hour implementation schedule requires SIPs from 8 5 hour nonattainment areas before December 31, 2008. In that event, a revised attainment demonstration SIP revision for the participating area will be due as soon as possible but no later than December 31, 2008. Under no circumstances will EPA extend the attainment date for the area beyond that required by the CAA and/ or EPA's 8 hour implementation rule. The region will not be allowed to renew this EAC after December 31, 2007 or to initiate a new EAC if it has previously forfeited its participation.

3.2 San Juan County Early Action Compact In December 2002 the state and local governments of San Juan County entered into a Memorandum of Agreement with EPA Region 6 consistent with terms specified in the EPA's EAC Protocol. Signatories to the agreement include:

The New Mexico Environment Department

The City of Aztec

The City of Farmington

The City of Bloomfield

San Juan County

U. S. Environmental Protection Agency, Region 6 The geographic area include in the EAC is all of San Juan County, excluding the Navajo Nation and Ute Mountain Reservation.

The EAC photochemical modeling focused on four distinct elevated ozone episodes during the summer of 2002 within a longer 50 day ozone period:

June 4 8, 2002

June 16 19, 2002

June 30 July 2, 2002

July 16 18, 2002.

The EAC established several planning milestones that must be met for the EAC to remain in effect. The milestones are as follows:

June 16, 2003   Potential state, local and other emission reduction strategies identified and described ( milestone met);

March 31, 2004   NMED must propose a Clean Air Action Plan

May 31, 2004   NMED must finalize a Clean Air Action Plan

December 31, 2004   If necessary, NMED must complete any required public rulemaking hearings, adopt the Clean Air Action Plan as part of the New Mexico SIP, and submit the SIP revision to EPA for approval

September 30, 2005   EPA must take final action on the SIP submittal

December 31, 2005   Any mandatory emission reduction strategies are to be implemented no later than this date

December 31, 2007   Demonstrated attainment of the 8 hour ozone standard. 6 The EAC also establishes several other requirements that must be included in the early action SIP and planning process:

3.2.1 Reporting The NMED assesses and reports progress towards milestones in a regular, public process, at least every six months, beginning in June 2003 and concluding in December 2007.

3.2.2 Emissions Inventories The National Emission Inventory maintained by EPA was used to determine point and mobile source emissions for San Juan County. The New Mexico Oil and Gas Association contributed estimates of additional emissions from oil and gas exploration and production activities that fall below air permitting thresholds. Future year inventories sufficiently account for projected future growth in ozone precursor emissions through 2007, particularly from stationary, area, and mobile sources. Emissions inventories were compared and analyzed for trends in emission sources over time. All adopted federal and state emission reduction strategies that have been or will be implemented by the December 31, 2007 attainment date are included in all emission inventories.

3.2.3 Photochemical Modeling Base and future case photochemical modeling is required and was performed with technical assistance from a modeling contractor. All modeling is SIP quality and performed within EPA's accepted margin of accuracy and based on EPA's guidance. The modeling is carefully documented in a series of reports, sufficiently accounts for projected future growth in ozone precursor emissions, was concurrently reviewed by EPA and a variety of technical and non technical stakeholders, and was used to determine the effects of changes and additions to the emissions inventory for future years.

3.2.4 Maintenance for Growth and Future Growth Scenarios The modeling includes a component to address emissions growth at least 5 years beyond December 31, 2007, making a best effort to ensure that the area will remain in attainment of the 8 hour standard during that period. This was accomplished with a modeling run for the year 2012. Additional future modeling runs for 2007 focused on a variety of growth scenarios dependent on changes and additions to the components of the emissions inventory. These included modeling runs that incorporated the following: ozone source apportionment runs, the addition of two new coal fired power plants to the area, condensing year 2012 oil and gas exploration and production to occur prior to 2007, increased mobile source emissions, doubled area source emissions, and doubled biogenic emissions.

3.2.5 Public Involvement 7 Public involvement was vital to all stages of technical work per the EAC. Periodic meetings with local EAC signatory parties were held by NMED. Several meetings with the Four Corners Ozone Task Force and the public were held during the course of the technical modeling analysis per the requirements of the EAC. Technical decision making and modeling was performed with involvement of a Technical Peer Review Committee, which was responsible for review and critique of work plans and products. The Technical Peer Review Committee held several conference calls and one meeting. NMED solicited and received input from stakeholders continually throughout the analysis through telephone and email contacts. Information about the EAC and inventory and modeling reports are available to the public on the Four Corners Ozone Task Force webpage ( http:// www. nmenv. state. nm. us/ ozonetf/). Additionally, the project has been well publicized in the local press. Articles and opinion pieces about air quality and ozone, as well as advertisements and press releases for meetings, appeared in local newspapers. Local radio and television broadcasts focused on air quality and ozone.

3.3 San Juan County Early Action Compact Results The results of the EAC modeling indicates that San Juan County is expected to remain in attainment of the 8 hour ozone standard through 2007 by a substantial margin. Concentrations of ozone are predicted to remain nearly the same during the next three years. Modeling predicted the Substation monitor's 2007 design value to be 0.07437 ppm and the Bloomfield monitor's 2007 design value to be 0.07249 ppm.

The modeled impact of adding two new power plants in the Four Corners region is projected to have minimal impact on 8 hour ozone concentrations. If the estimated year 2012 development of the San Juan Basin oil and gas field is accelerated to actually occur three years from now ( i. e., by 2007) the modeled impact on 8 hour ozone concentrations is expected to be insignificant. Impacts on 8 hour ozone concentrations were also insignificant when on road motor vehicle emissions rates were increased to reflect an older vehicle fleet, and when the area source emissions inventory was doubled. In addition, the impact of year 2012 emissions on 8 hour ozone concentrations was also modeled to be minimal.

The impact on 8 hour ozone concentrations was greatest when biogenic VOC and NOx were doubled, indicating that an exceedence of the 8 hour ozone NAAQS in San Juan County in the future will require a significant increase in VOC emissions and/ or heightened VOC reactivity. 8 4. Clean Air Action Plan Components 4.1 State Implementation Plans and Enforceable Control Measures The purpose of the CAAP is to serve as San Juan County's official air quality improvement plan, with quantified emission reduction measures. The CAAP needs to include necessary elements of a comprehensive air quality plan, but must be tailored to meet local needs and driven by local decisions.

One of the milestones of the EAC is the formal incorporation of the CAAP into the SIP for New Mexico. Included with the incorporation of the CAAP is the adoption of enforceable control measures for reducing ozone forming pollutants within the EAC area as a means of maintaining the 8 hour NAAQS for ozone. Due to the low ozone designed values that have been modeled for the EAC area, the NMED does not feel that these results indicate that mandatory control measures are needed to avoid San Juan County from being designated nonattainment, nor are any measures mandatory at present in order to model 2007 8 hour ozone concentrations in San Juan County that are within the 8 hour ozone NAAQS. However, the San Juan County EAC signatories are committed to ensuring that their area remains in attainment of the 8 hour ozone NAAQS.

The EAC signatories, in partnership with the Four Corners Ozone Task Force and other interested parties, have compiled the components of the San Juan County Clean Air Action Plan described in the following section as a best attempt to keep maintain attainment of 8 hour ozone NAAQS. Although the measures to be taken are neither mandatory nor enforceable, they represent San Juan County's best effort at continuing to take early action to maintain good air quality. Additional strategies will be developed and implemented to meet the requirements of the EAC if the voluntary strategies outlined in the CAAP fail.

4.2 Public Outreach Campaign 4.2.1 Web Site NMED will develop a web site dedicated to the dissemination of ozone related outreach material related to the San Juan County EAC region. Included in the web site will be:

Health related information developed by the EPA;

Basic ozone information;

Ozone monitoring for the two ozone monitoring sites located in San Juan County;

Public outreach materials of children;

Related ozone studies and presentation for the EAC region; and

Upcoming meetings, press releases, and public service announcements. 9 4.2.2 Public Service Announcements The NMED is collaboration with the local governments within San Juan County will develop a series of public service announcements ( PSA). These PSAs will advise local citizens in San Juan County to the hazards associated with ozone pollution and how to reduce ozone forming contaminates in their daily lives. The PSAs will be aired on two local radio stations in San Juan County during the months of May through August.

4.2.3 Educational Outreach Materials For Children The NMED has created an ozone education workbook for children between the ages of 10 and 12 years. The workbook takes the children through the adventures of Tripper the cat and Bear the Hamster as they learn about ozone pollution is San Juan County. Included in the workbook is information on what ozone pollution is, how ozone pollution is created, how ozone pollution differs from stratospheric ozone, ozone in San Juan County, and how to reduce ozone pollution at the local level. The workbook also includes a color poster that lists ozone pollution reduction suggestions.

4.3 Voluntary Program for Emissions Controls The emission control program would be a flexible, voluntary initiative administered by the NMED. The purpose of the program would be to identify and promote the implementation of cost effective technologies and practices to reduce ozone forming emissions from oil and gas production. Companies that choose to participate in the program would be recognized by the NMED as Clean Air Partners for San Juan County. The program would be modeled after the EPA Natural Gas Star Program.


[Federal Register Volume 82, Number 86 (Friday, May 5, 2017)]
[Proposed Rules]
[Pages 21155-21156]
[FR Doc No: 2017-09177]

=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY

Coast Guard

46 CFR Parts 401, 403, and 404

[USCG-2016-0268]
RIN 1625-AC34

Great Lakes Pilotage Rates--2017 Annual Review

AGENCY: Coast Guard, DHS.

ACTION: Notice of extension of comment period on supplemental notice of
proposed rulemaking.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Coast Guard is adding an additional 30 days to the comment
period on the supplemental notice of proposed rulemaking for ``Great
Lakes Pilotage Rates--2017 Annual Review'' published in the Federal
Register on

April 5, 2017. We are extending the comment period to allow the public
more time to comment on the proposed rulemaking. The comment period is
now open through June 5, 2017.

DATES: The comment period for the proposed rule published April 5, 2017
(82 FR 16542) is extended. Comments and related material must be
received by the Coast Guard on or before June 5, 2017.

ADDRESSES: You may submit comments identified by docket number USCG-
2016-0268 using the Federal eRulemaking Portal at http://www.regulations.gov. See the ``Public Participation and Request for
Comments'' portion of the SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION section for further
instructions on submitting comments.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: If you have questions about this
proposed rulemaking, call or email Mr. Todd Haviland, Director, Great
Lakes Pilotage, Commandant (CG-WWM-2), Coast Guard; telephone 202-372-
2037, email<EMAIL_ADDRESS>or fax<PHONE_NUMBER>.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The Coast Guard is adding an additional 30
days to the comment period on the supplemental notice of proposed
rulemaking (SNPRM) for ``Great Lakes Pilotage Rates--2017 Annual
Review'' published in the Federal Register on April 5, 2017 (82 FR
16542). We received a request to extend the comment period 60 days and
to hold a public meeting. The requester cited the significance of the
issues and the questions raised by the SNPRM. We do not see a need for
a public meeting and believe that an additional 30 days should provide
sufficient time to comment on the proposed rule. The comment period is
now open through June 5, 2017.
    As we stated in the summary of the SNPRM, the Coast Guard proposes
to modify its calculations for hourly pilotage rates on the Great Lakes
by accounting for the ``weighting factor,'' which is a multiplier that
can increase the pilotage costs for larger vessels traversing areas in
the Great Lakes by a factor of up to 1.45. While the weighting factor
has existed for decades, it has never been included in any of the
previous ratemaking calculations. We propose to add steps to our rate-
setting methodology to adjust hourly rates downwards by an amount equal
to the average weighting factor, so that when the weighting factor is
applied, the cost to the shippers and the corresponding revenue
generated for the pilot associations will adjust to what was originally
intended. We note that until a final rule is produced, the 2016 rates
will stay in effect, even if a final rule is not published by the start
of the 2017 season.

Public Participation and Request for Comments

    We view public participation as essential to effective rulemaking,
and will consider all comments and material received during the comment
period. Your comment can help shape the outcome of this rulemaking. If
you submit a comment, please include the docket number for this
rulemaking, indicate the specific section of this document to which
each comment applies, and provide a reason for each suggestion or
recommendation.
    We encourage you to submit comments through the Federal eRulemaking
Portal at http://www.regulations.gov. If your material cannot be
submitted using http://www.regulations.gov, contact the person in the
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT section of this document for alternate
instructions.
    We accept anonymous comments. All comments received will be posted
without change to http://www.regulations.gov and will include any
personal information you have provided. For more about privacy and the
docket, visit http://www.regulations.gov/privacyNotice.
    The SNPRM we are seeking comments on, and documents mentioned in
the SNPRM as being available in the docket--including all public
comments, will be in our online docket at http://www.regulations.gov
and can be viewed by following that Web site's instructions.
Additionally, if you go to the online docket and sign up for email
alerts, you will be notified when comments are posted or a final rule
is published.

    Dated: May 2, 2017.
Michael D. Emerson,
Director, Marine Transportation Systems, U.S. Coast Guard.
[FR Doc. 2017-09177 Filed 5-4-17; 8:45 am]
 BILLING CODE 9110-04-P


February 24, 2012

MEMORANDUM

TO: 			Air Docket EPA-HQ-OAR-2011-0542

SUBJECT:	Meeting with Wilmar Oleo North America, LLC

On February 8, 2012, EPA met with representatives of Wilmar Oleo North
America, LLC to discuss the Notice of Data Availability for Renewable
Fuels Produced from Palm Oil Under the Renewable Fuel Standard Program.
The meeting took place at EPA Headquarters in Washington, DC.

Discussion topics included methane emissions from palm oil mills,
greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions associated with land use changes, palm
oil yields, GHG emissions from draining peat soils and policies to
reduce deforestation in Indonesia and Malaysia.  Wilmar expressed their
intention to submit comments to the docket on these topics.

A set of slides that Wilmar distributed during the meeting are attached
to this docket entry.

Attendees included:

Aaron Levy, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency

Benjamin Hengst, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency

Sharyn Lie, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency

Paul Argyropoulos, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency

Robert Larson, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency

John Cummings, Wilmar Oleo North America (Houston)

Jeremy Goon, Wilmar International (Singapore)

Ben McMakin, Van Ness Feldman

Janet Anderson, Van Ness Feldman

Tomas Carbonell, Van Ness Feldman

  PAGE   \* MERGEFORMAT  1