[Federal Register Volume 77, Number 40 (Wednesday, February 29, 2012)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Pages 12175-12176]
[FR Doc No: 2012-3908]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION

Federal Aviation Administration

14 CFR Part 39

[Docket No. FAA-2011-1166; Directorate Identifier 2010-NM-169-AD;
Amendment 39-16941; AD 2012-02-18]
RIN 2120-AA64

Airworthiness Directives; DASSAULT AVIATION Airplanes

AGENCY: Federal Aviation Administration (FAA), Department of
Transportation (DOT).

ACTION: Final rule.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: We are adopting a new airworthiness directive (AD) for all
DASSAULT AVIATION Model MYSTERE-FALCON 50 airplanes. This AD was
prompted by reports of cracking of the flap tracks. This AD requires
revising the maintenance program to include revised airworthiness
limitations. We are issuing this AD to prevent cracking of the flap
tracks, which could lead to flap asymmetry and loss of control of the
airplane.

DATES: This AD becomes effective April 4, 2012.
    The Director of the Federal Register approved the incorporation by
reference of a certain publication listed in this AD as of April 4,
2012.

ADDRESSES: You may examine the AD docket on the Internet at http://www.regulations.gov or in person at the U.S. Department of
Transportation, Docket Operations, M-30, West Building Ground Floor,
Room W12-140, 1200 New Jersey Avenue SE., Washington, DC.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Tom Rodriguez, Aerospace Engineer,
International Branch, ANM-116, Transport Airplane Directorate, FAA,
1601 Lind Avenue SW., Renton, Washington 98057-3356; telephone (425)
227-1137; fax<PHONE_NUMBER>.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

Discussion

    We issued a notice of proposed rulemaking (NPRM) to amend 14 CFR
part 39 to include an AD that would apply to the specified products.
That NPRM was published in the Federal Register on November 2, 2011 (76
FR 67633). That NPRM proposed to correct an unsafe condition for the
specified products. The MCAI states:

    The Maintenance Procedure (MP) 57-607, related to non
destructive check of the flap tracks 2 and 5, has been introduced
thru revision 4 (01/2009) of section 5-10 of the Recommended
Maintenance Schedules chapter of the Aircraft Maintenance
Documentation.
    After the implementation of this MP cracks have been detected in
service.
* * * * *
Cracking of the flap tracks could lead to flap asymmetry and loss of
control of the airplane. The required actions include revising the
maintenance program to include ``Non-Destructive Check of Flap Tracks 2
and 5,'' Maintenance Procedure 57-607, of Chapter 5-40, ``Airworthiness
Limitations,'' of the Dassault Falcon 50/50EX Maintenance Manual,
Revision 21, dated June 2011. You may obtain further information by
examining the MCAI in the AD docket.

Comments

    We gave the public the opportunity to participate in developing
this AD. We received no comments on the NPRM (76 FR 67633, November 2,
2011) or on the determination of the cost to the public.

Explanation of Change Made to This AD

    We have revised the document citation for the service information
referenced throughout this AD.

Conclusion

    We reviewed the relevant data and determined that air safety and
the public interest require adopting the AD with the change described
previously--except for minor editorial changes. We have determined that
these minor changes:
     Are consistent with the intent that was proposed in the
NPRM (76 FR 67633, November 2, 2011) for correcting the unsafe
condition; and
     Do not add any additional burden upon the public than was
already proposed in the NPRM (76 FR 67633, November 2, 2011).

Costs of Compliance

    We estimate that this AD will affect 250 products of U.S. registry.
We also estimate that it will take about 1 work-hour per product to
comply with the basic requirements of this AD. The average labor rate
is $85 per work-hour. Based on these figures, we estimate the cost of
this AD to the U.S. operators to be $21,250, or $85 per product.

Authority for This Rulemaking

    Title 49 of the United States Code specifies the FAA's authority to
issue rules on aviation safety. Subtitle I, section 106, describes the
authority of the FAA Administrator. ``Subtitle VII: Aviation
Programs,'' describes in more detail the scope of the Agency's
authority.
    We are issuing this rulemaking under the authority described in
``Subtitle VII, Part A, Subpart III, Section 44701: General
requirements.'' Under that section, Congress charges the FAA with
promoting safe flight of civil aircraft in air commerce by prescribing
regulations for practices, methods, and procedures the Administrator
finds necessary for safety in air commerce. This regulation is within
the scope of that authority because it addresses an unsafe condition
that is likely to exist or develop on products identified in this
rulemaking action.

Regulatory Findings

    We determined that this AD will not have federalism implications
under Executive Order 13132. This AD will not have a substantial direct
effect on the States, on the relationship between the national
government and the States, or on the distribution of power and
responsibilities among the various levels of government.
    For the reasons discussed above, I certify this proposed
regulation:
    1. Is not a ``significant regulatory action'' under Executive Order
12866;
    2. Is not a ``significant rule'' under the DOT Regulatory Policies
and Procedures (44 FR 11034, February 26, 1979);
    3. Will not affect intrastate aviation in Alaska; and
    4. Will not have a significant economic impact, positive or
negative, on a substantial number of small entities under the criteria
of the Regulatory Flexibility Act.
    We prepared a regulatory evaluation of the estimated costs to
comply with this AD and placed it in the AD docket.

Examining the AD Docket

    You may examine the AD docket on the Internet at http://www.regulations.gov; or in person at the Docket Operations office
between 9 a.m. and 5 p.m., Monday through Friday, except Federal
holidays. The AD docket contains the NPRM (76 FR 67633,

November 2, 2011), the regulatory evaluation, any comments received,
and other information. The street address for the Docket Operations
office (telephone<PHONE_NUMBER>) is in the ADDRESSES section. Comments
will be available in the AD docket shortly after receipt.

List of Subjects in 14 CFR Part 39

    Air transportation, Aircraft, Aviation safety, Incorporation by
reference, Safety.

Adoption of the Amendment

    Accordingly, under the authority delegated to me by the
Administrator, the FAA amends 14 CFR part 39 as follows:

PART 39--AIRWORTHINESS DIRECTIVES

0
1. The authority citation for part 39 continues to read as follows:

    Authority: 49 U.S.C. 106(g), 40113, 44701.

Sec.  39.13  [Amended]

0
2. The FAA amends Sec.  39.13 by adding the following new AD:

2012-02-18 DASSAULT AVIATION: Amendment 39-16941. Docket No. FAA-
2011-1166; Directorate Identifier 2010-NM-169-AD.

(a) Effective Date

    This airworthiness directive (AD) becomes effective April 4,
2012.

(b) Affected ADs

    None.

(c) Applicability

    This AD applies to DASSAULT AVIATION Model MYSTERE-FALCON 50
airplanes, all serial numbers, certificated in any category.

(d) Subject

    Air Transport Association (ATA) of America Code 57: Wings.

(e) Reason

    This AD was prompted by reports of cracking of the flap tracks.
We are issuing this AD to prevent cracking of the flap tracks, which
could lead to flap asymmetry and loss of control of the airplane.

(f) Compliance

    You are responsible for having the actions required by this AD
performed within the compliance times specified, unless the actions
have already been done.

(g) Actions

    Within 30 days after the effective date of the AD, revise the
maintenance program to include ``Non-Destructive Check of Flap
Tracks 2 and 5,'' Maintenance Procedure 57-607, of Chapter 5-40,
``Airworthiness Limitations,'' of the Dassault Falcon 50/50EX
Maintenance Manual, Revision 21, dated June 2011. The initial
compliance time for doing the check is prior to the accumulation of
7,900 total flight cycles or within 600 flight cycles after the
effective date of this AD, whichever occurs later.

(h) No Alternative Actions or Intervals

    After accomplishing the revision required by paragraph (g) of
this AD, no alternative actions (e.g., inspections) or intervals may
be used unless the actions or intervals are approved as an
alternative method of compliance (AMOC) in accordance with the
procedures specified in paragraph (i)(1) of this AD.

(i) Other FAA AD Provisions

    The following provisions also apply to this AD:
    (1) Alternative Methods of Compliance (AMOCs): The Manager,
International Branch, ANM-116, Transport Airplane Directorate, FAA,
has the authority to approve AMOCs for this AD, if requested using
the procedures found in 14 CFR 39.19. In accordance with 14 CFR
39.19, send your request to your principal inspector or local Flight
Standards District Office, as appropriate. If sending information
directly to the International Branch, send it to ATTN: Tom
Rodriguez, Aerospace Engineer, International Branch, ANM-116,
Transport Airplane Directorate, FAA, 1601 Lind Avenue SW., Renton,
Washington 98057-3356; phone:<PHONE_NUMBER>; fax:<PHONE_NUMBER>.
Information may be emailed to<EMAIL_ADDRESS>
Before using any approved AMOC, notify your appropriate principal
inspector, or lacking a principal inspector, the manager of the
local flight standards district office/certificate holding district
office. The AMOC approval letter must specifically reference this
AD.
    (2) Airworthy Product: For any requirement in this AD to obtain
corrective actions from a manufacturer or other source, use these
actions if they are FAA-approved. Corrective actions are considered
FAA-approved if they are approved by the State of Design Authority
(or their delegated agent). You are required to assure the product
is airworthy before it is returned to service

(j) Related Information

    Refer to MCAI European Aviation Safety Agency (EASA)
Airworthiness Directive 2010-0080, dated April 29, 2010; and ``Non-
Destructive Check of Flap Tracks 2 and 5,'' Maintenance Procedure
57-607, of Chapter 5-40, ``Airworthiness Limitations,'' of the
Dassault Falcon 50/50EX Maintenance Manual, Revision 21, dated June
2011; for related information.

(k) Material Incorporated by Reference

    (1) You must use the following service information to do the
actions required by this AD, unless the AD specifies otherwise. The
Director of the Federal Register approved the incorporation by
reference (IBR) under 5 U.S.C. 552(a) and 1 CFR part 51 of the
following service information.
    (i) ``Non-Destructive Check of Flap Tracks 2 and 5,''
Maintenance Procedure 57-607, of Chapter 5-40, ``Airworthiness
Limitations,'' of the Dassault Falcon 50/50EX Maintenance Manual,
Revision 21, dated June 2011.
    (A) Only the title page of Chapter 5-40 specifies the revision
level of 21, dated June 2011; the remaining pages show only the
revision date of June 2011.
    (B) The pages of the maintenance procedure show a revision date
of January 2009.
    (2) For service information identified in this AD, contact
Dassault Falcon Jet, P.O. Box 2000, South Hackensack, New Jersey
07606; telephone<PHONE_NUMBER>; Internet http://www.dassaultfalcon.com.
    (3) You may review copies of the service information at the FAA,
Transport Airplane Directorate, 1601 Lind Avenue SW., Renton,
Washington. For information on the availability of this material at
the FAA, call<PHONE_NUMBER>.
    (4) You may also review copies of the service information that
is incorporated by reference at the National Archives and Records
Administration (NARA). For information on the availability of this
material at an NARA facility, call<PHONE_NUMBER>, or go to http://www.archives.gov/federal_register/code_of_federal_regulations/ibr_locations.html.

    Issued in Renton, Washington, on January 26, 2012.
Kalene C. Yanamura,
Acting Manager, Transport Airplane Directorate, Aircraft Certification
Service.
[FR Doc. 2012-3908 Filed 2-28-12; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910-13-P


[Federal Register Volume 80, Number 3 (Tuesday, January 6, 2015)]
[Notices]
[Pages 509-510]
[FR Doc No: 2014-30909]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES

Food and Drug Administration

[Docket No. FDA-2014-P-0980]

Determination That REYATAZ (Atazanavir Sulfate) Capsules, 100
Milligrams, Were Not Withdrawn From Sale for Reasons of Safety or
Effectiveness

AGENCY: Food and Drug Administration, HHS.

ACTION: Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Food and Drug Administration (FDA or Agency) has
determined that REYATAZ (atazanavir sulfate) capsules, 100 milligrams
(mg), were not withdrawn from sale for reasons of safety or
effectiveness. This determination will allow FDA to approve abbreviated
new drug applications (ANDAs) for atazanavir sulfate, 100 mg, if all
other legal and regulatory requirements are met.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Na'Im R. Moses, Center for Drug
Evaluation and Research, Food and Drug Administration, 10903 New
Hampshire Ave., Bldg. 51, Rm. 6224, Silver Spring, MD 20993-0002, 240-
402-3990.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: In 1984, Congress enacted the Drug Price
Competition and Patent Term Restoration Act of 1984 (Pub. L. 98-417)
(the 1984 amendments), which authorized the approval of duplicate
versions of drug products under an ANDA procedure. ANDA applicants
must, with certain exceptions, show that the drug for which they are
seeking approval contains the same active ingredient in the same
strength and dosage form as the ``listed drug,'' which is a version of
the drug that was previously approved. ANDA applicants do not have to
repeat the extensive clinical testing otherwise necessary to gain
approval of a new drug application (NDA).
    The 1984 amendments include what is now section 505(j)(7) of the
Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act (21 U.S.C. 355(j)(7)), which
requires FDA to publish a list of all approved drugs. FDA publishes
this list as part of the ``Approved Drug Products With Therapeutic
Equivalence Evaluations,'' which is known generally as the ``Orange
Book.'' Under FDA regulations, drugs are removed from the list if the
Agency withdraws or suspends approval of the drug's NDA or ANDA for
reasons of safety or effectiveness or if FDA determines that the listed
drug was withdrawn from sale for reasons of safety or effectiveness (21
CFR 314.162).
    A person may petition the Agency to determine, or the Agency may
determine on its own initiative, whether a listed drug was withdrawn
from sale for reasons of safety or effectiveness. This determination
may be made at any time after the drug has been withdrawn from sale,
but must be made prior to approving an ANDA that refers to the listed
drug (Sec.  314.161 (21 CFR 314.161)). FDA may not approve an ANDA that
does not refer to a listed drug.
    REYATAZ (atazanavir sulfate) capsules, 100 mg, is the subject of
NDA 21-567, held by Bristol-Myers Squibb, and initially approved on
June 20, 2003.

REYATAZ is a protease inhibitor indicated for use in combination with
other antiretroviral agents for the treatment of human immunodeficiency
virus (HIV-1) infection in patients 3 months and older weighing at
least 10 kilograms.
    In a letter dated August 19, 2014, Bristol-Myers Squibb notified
FDA that REYATAZ (atazanavir sulfate) capsules, 100 mg, had been
discontinued. The REYATAZ 150-, 200-, and 300-mg capsule strengths
continue to be marketed by Bristol-Myers Squibb. The 100-mg dosage
strength of this drug product is currently listed in the ``Discontinued
Drug Product List'' section of the Orange Book.
    Lachman Consultant Services, Inc., submitted a citizen petition
dated July 7, 2014 (Docket No. FDA-2014-P-0980), under 21 CFR 10.30,
requesting that the Agency determine whether REYATAZ (atazanavir
sulfate) capsules, 100 mg, were withdrawn from sale for reasons of
safety or effectiveness.
    After considering the citizen petition and reviewing Agency records
and based on the information we have at this time, FDA has determined
under Sec.  314.161 that REYATAZ (atazanavir sulfate) capsules, 100 mg,
were not withdrawn for reasons of safety or effectiveness. The
petitioner has identified no data or other information suggesting that
REYATAZ (atazanavir sulfate) capsules, 100 mg, were withdrawn for
reasons of safety or effectiveness. We have carefully reviewed our
files for records concerning the withdrawal of REYATAZ (atazanavir
sulfate) capsules, 100 mg, from sale. We have also independently
evaluated relevant literature and data for possible postmarketing
adverse events. We have reviewed the available evidence and determined
that the product was not withdrawn from sale for reasons of safety or
effectiveness.
    Accordingly, the Agency will continue to list REYATAZ (atazanavir
sulfate) capsules, 100 mg, in the ``Discontinued Drug Product List''
section of the Orange Book. The ``Discontinued Drug Product List''
delineates, among other items, drug products that have been
discontinued from marketing for reasons other than safety or
effectiveness. ANDAs that refer to REYATAZ (atazanavir sulfate)
capsules, 100 mg, may be approved by the Agency as long as they meet
all other legal and regulatory requirements for the approval of ANDAs.
If FDA determines that labeling for this drug product should be revised
to meet current standards, the Agency will advise ANDA applicants to
submit such labeling.

    Dated: December 30, 2014.
Leslie Kux,
Associate Commissioner for Policy.
[FR Doc. 2014-30909 Filed 1-5-15; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4164-01-P


[Federal Register Volume 86, Number 99 (Tuesday, May 25, 2021)]
[Notices]
[Pages 28125-28126]
[FR Doc No: 2021-11004]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY

Federal Emergency Management Agency

[Internal Agency Docket No. FEMA-4523-DR; Docket ID FEMA-2021-0001]

Nevada; Amendment No. 5 to Notice of a Major Disaster Declaration

AGENCY: Federal Emergency Management Agency, DHS.

ACTION: Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: This notice amends the notice of a major disaster declaration
for the State of Nevada (FEMA-4523-DR), dated April 4, 2020, and
related determinations.

DATES: This change occurred on April 26, 2021.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Dean Webster, Office of Response and
Recovery, Federal Emergency Management Agency, 500 C Street SW,
Washington, DC 20472,<PHONE_NUMBER>.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The Federal Emergency Management Agency
(FEMA) hereby gives notice that pursuant to the authority vested in the
Administrator, under Executive Order 12148, as amended, Robert J.
Fenton, of FEMA is appointed to act as the Federal Coordinating Officer
for this disaster.
    This action terminates the appointment of Tammy L. Littrell as
Federal Coordinating Officer for this disaster.

    The following Catalog of Federal Domestic Assistance Numbers
(CFDA) are to be used for reporting and drawing funds: 97.030,
Community Disaster Loans; 97.031, Cora Brown Fund; 97.032, Crisis
Counseling; 97.033, Disaster Legal Services; 97.034, Disaster
Unemployment Assistance (DUA); 97.046, Fire Management Assistance
Grant; 97.048, Disaster Housing Assistance to Individuals and
Households In Presidentially Declared Disaster Areas; 97.049,
Presidentially Declared Disaster Assistance--Disaster Housing
Operations for Individuals and Households; 97.050, Presidentially
Declared Disaster Assistance to Individuals and Households--Other
Needs; 97.036, Disaster Grants--Public Assistance

(Presidentially Declared Disasters); 97.039, Hazard Mitigation
Grant.

Deanne Criswell,
Administrator, Federal Emergency Management Agency.
[FR Doc. 2021-11004 Filed 5-24-21; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 9111-23-P


[Federal Register Volume 84, Number 74 (Wednesday, April 17, 2019)]
[Proposed Rules]
[Pages 15992-15993]
[FR Doc No: 2019-07592]

=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION

Federal Aviation Administration

14 CFR Part 21

[Docket No. FAA-2019-0280]

Proposed Primary Category Design Standards; Cub Crafters, Inc.,
Model CC21-180 Airplane

AGENCY: Federal Aviation Administration (FAA), DOT.

ACTION: Notice of availability; request for comments.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: This document announces the existence of and requests comments
on the proposed airworthiness design standards for acceptance for the
type certification of the Cub Crafters, Inc., Model CC21-180 airplane
under the regulations for primary category aircraft.

DATES: Comments must be received on or before May 17, 2019.

ADDRESSES: Send comments identified by docket number FAA-2019-0280
using any of the following methods:
     Federal eRegulations Portal: Go to http://www.regulations.gov and follow the online instructions for sending your
comments electronically.
     Mail: Send comments to Docket Operations, M-30, U.S.
Department of Transportation (DOT), 1200 New Jersey Avenue SE, Room
W12-140, West Building Ground Floor, Washington, DC 20590-0001.
     Hand Delivery of Courier: Take comments to Docket
Operations in Room W12-140 of the West Building Ground Floor at 1200
New Jersey Avenue SE, Washington, DC, between 9 a.m., and 5 p.m.,
Monday through Friday, except Federal holidays.
     Fax: Fax comments to Docket Operations at<PHONE_NUMBER>.
    Privacy: The FAA will post all comments it receives, without
change, to http://regulations.gov, including any personal information
the commenter provides. Using the search function of the docket
website, anyone can find and read the electronic form of all comments
received into any FAA docket, including the name of the individual
sending the comment (or signing the comment for an association,
business, labor union, etc.). DOT's complete Privacy Act Statement can
be found in the Federal Register published on April 11, 2000 (65 FR
19477-19478), as well as at http://DocketsInfo.dot.gov.
    Docket: Background documents or comments received may be read at
http://www.regulations.gov at any time. Follow the online instructions
for accessing the docket or go to the Docket Operations in Room W12-140
of the West Building Ground Floor at 1200 New Jersey Avenue SE,
Washington, DC, between 9 a.m., and 5 p.m., Monday through Friday,
except Federal holidays.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Mr. Raymond N. Johnston, AIR-692,
Federal Aviation Administration, Policy & Innovation Division, Small
Airplane Standards Branch, 901 Locust, Room 301, Kansas City, MO 64106,
telephone<PHONE_NUMBER>, FAX<PHONE_NUMBER>, email
[email protected].

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Any person may obtain a copy of this
information by contacting the person named above under FOR FURTHER
INFORMATION CONTACT.

Comments Invited

    We invite interested people to take part in this rulemaking by
sending written comments, data, or views. The most helpful comments
reference a specific portion of the design criteria, explain the reason
for any recommended change, and include supporting data. We ask that
you send us two copies of written comments.
    We will consider all comments received on or before the closing
date for comments. We will consider comments filed late if it is
possible to do so without incurring expense or delay. We may change
these airworthiness design criteria based on received comments.

Background

    The ``primary'' category for aircraft was created specifically for
the simple, low performance personal aircraft. Section 21.17,
Designation of applicable

regulations, paragraph (f) provides a means for the FAA to determine
appropriate airworthiness standards for the particular primary category
aircraft. The FAA procedure establishing appropriate airworthiness
standards includes reviewing and possibly revising an applicant's
proposal, publication of the submittal in the Federal Register for
public review and comment, and addressing the comments. After all
necessary revisions, the standards are published as approved FAA
airworthiness standards.
    Accordingly, Cub Crafters, Inc., has submitted these proposed
airworthiness standards for the Model CC21-180 airplane under Sec.
21.17(f).

Proposed Airworthiness Standards for Acceptance Under the Primary
Category Rule

    This document prescribes airworthiness standards for the issuance
of a type certification for the Cub Crafters, Inc., Model CC21-180, a
primary category airplane. These proposed airworthiness standards have
a long safe service history in similar airplanes; therefore, they
provide an appropriate level of safety. The proposed airworthiness
standards are based on standards that were used to certify the same
design as a normal and utility category airplane, Cub Crafters CC19-
180, in accordance with FAA Type Certiciate A00053SE.

For the Airplane

    Title 14, Code of Federal Regulations (14 CFR) part 23, effective
December 18, 1964, as amended by 23-1 through 23-62, all sections
except Sec.  23.562 Emergency Landing Dynamic Conditions, and as
modified by the following:

    Equivalent Level of Safety (ELOS) No. TC10279SE-A-C-1 for the
emergency exit requirements of Sec.  23.807 \1\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \1\ See http://rgl.faa.gov/Regulatory_and_Guidance_Library/rgELOS.nsf/0/F3FC2C42E551237F86257FC60046467D?OpenDocument&Highlight=tc10279se-a-c-1.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    ELOS No. AT12936SE-A-S-1 for the electronic display instrument
system requirements of Sec.  23.1311 \2\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \2\ See http://rgl.faa.gov/Regulatory_and_Guidance_Library/rgELOS.nsf/0/E441A4F21736F7E98625814500674B2A?OpenDocument.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    ELOS No. TC10279SE-A-G-9 for corrections to technical errors in
amendment 23-62 \3\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \3\ See http://rgl.faa.gov/Regulatory_and_Guidance_Library/rgELOS.nsf/0/773696FE2DDEA61D86257FF50065B4B6?OpenDocument.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    ELOS No. AT12949SE-A-F-1 for the longitudinal trim requirements of
Sec.  23.161 \4\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \4\ See http://rgl.faa.gov/Regulatory_and_Guidance_Library/rgELOS.nsf/0/0D9E358153C4CF028625825D005E5D15?OpenDocument.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

For Noise Standards

    14 CFR part 36 as amended by 36-1 through 36-30, appendix G.

    Issued in Kansas City, Missouri, on April 8, 2019.
Pat Mullen,
Manager, Small Airplane Standards Branch, Aircraft Certification
Service.
[FR Doc. 2019-07592 Filed 4-16-19; 8:45 am]
 BILLING CODE 4910-13-P


[Federal Register: August 12, 2009 (Volume 74, Number 154)]
[Notices]
[Page 40578-40579]
[DOCID:fr12au09-52]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission

[Project Nos. 2727-085; 2666-032; 2534-091; 2710-053, and 2712-072]

PPL Maine, LLC; Black Bear Hydro Partners, LLC; Notice of
Application for Transfer of License, and Soliciting Comments, Motions
To Intervene, and Protests

August 5, 2009.
    On July 24, 2009, PPL Maine, LLC (Transferor) and Black Bear Hydro
Partners, LLC (Transferee) filed a joint application for transfer of
licenses of the Ellsworth Project No. 2727, Medway Project No. 2666,
Milford Project No. 2534, Orono Project No. 2710, and the Stillwater
Project No. 2712. The Ellsworth Project is located on the Union River
near the city of Ellsworth in Hancock County, Maine. The Medway Project
is located on the West Branch Penobscot River near the city of Medway
in Penobscot County, Maine. The Milford Project is located on the
Penobscot River near the city of Old Town in Penobscot County, Maine.
The Orono and Stillwater Projects are located on the Stillwater Branch
of the Penobscot River near the city of Orono in Penobscot County,
Maine.
    Applicants seek Commission approval to transfer the licenses for
the Ellsworth, Medway, Milford, Orono, and Stillwater Projects from PPL
Maine, LLC, to Black Bear Hydro Partners, LLC.
    Applicant Contact: For Transferor: Jesse A. Dillon, PPL Maine, LLC,
c/o PPL Services Corporation, Office of General Counsel, Two North
Ninth Street, Allentown, PA 18101,<PHONE_NUMBER>.
    For Transferee: Christine Miller, Esq. Black Bear Hydro Partners,
LLC, c/o ArcLight Capital Partners, LLC, 200 Clarendon Street, Boston,
MA 02117,<PHONE_NUMBER>.
    FERC Contact: Steven Sachs,<PHONE_NUMBER> or
<EMAIL_ADDRESS>    Deadline for filing comments, protests, and motions to intervene:
30 days from the issuance of this notice. Comments and motions to
intervene may be filed electronically via the Internet. See 18 CFR
385.2001(a)(1)(iii) and the instructions on the Commission's Web site
under the ``e-Filing'' link. If unable to be filed electronically,
documents may be paper-filed. To paper-file, an original and eight
copies should be mailed to: Kimberly D. Bose, Secretary, Federal Energy
Regulatory Commission, 888 First Street, NE., Washington, DC 20426. For
more information on how to submit

these types of filings please go to the Commission's Web site located
at http://www.ferc.gov/filing-comments.asp. More information about this
project can be viewed or printed on the ``eLibrary'' link of
Commission's Web site at http://www.ferc.gov/docs-filing/elibrary.asp.
Enter the docket number (P-2727-085 etc.) in the docket number field to
access the document. For assistance, call toll-free 1-866-208-3372.

Nathaniel J. Davis, Sr.,
Deputy Secretary.
[FR Doc. E9-19271 Filed 8-11-09; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 6717-01-P


[Federal Register: October 3, 2007 (Volume 72, Number 191)]
[Notices]
[Page 56344-56346]
[DOCID:fr03oc07-47]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY

[EPA-HQ-OPP-2007-0328; FRL-8149-8]

Guidance on Recommended Environmental Hazard Statements for
Outdoor Residential Pesticides; Notice of Availability

AGENCY: Environmental Protection Agency (EPA).

ACTION: Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Agency seeks public comment on a draft Pesticide
Registration (PR) Notice entitled ``Environmental Hazard Statements for
Outdoor Residential Pesticides''. The proposed guidance is directed
toward current or prospective registrants of outdoor residential use
pesticides on recommended environmental hazard language. This guidance
recommends new environmental hazard statements that are designed to
replace language created for agricultural products with statements that
are easier for consumers to understand. The new environmental hazard
statements are divided by product type (e.g., liquid ready-to-use,
broadcast granular), and recommends specific language for each product
type to minimize risks to the human health and the environment, with
emphasis on reducing risks to water. Revisions to product labels using
these new statements may be made by notification.

DATES: Comments must be received on or before November 2, 2007.

ADDRESSES: Submit your comments, identified by docket identification
(ID) number EPA-HQ-OPP-2007-EPA-HQ-OPP-2007-0328 by one of the
following methods:
     Federal eRulemaking Portal: http://www.regulations.gov.

Follow the on-line instructions for submitting comments.
     Mail: Office of Pesticide Programs (OPP) Regulatory Public
Docket (7502P), Environmental Protection Agency, 1200 Pennsylvania
Ave., NW., Washington, DC 20460-0001.
     Delivery: OPP Regulatory Public Docket (7502P),
Environmental Protection Agency, Rm. S-4400, One Potomac Yard (South
Bldg.), 2777 S. Crystal Dr., Arlington, VA. Deliveries are only
accepted during the Docket's normal hours of operation (8:30 a.m. to 4
p.m., Monday through Friday, excluding legal holidays). Special
arrangements should be made for deliveries of boxed information. The
Docket Facility telephone number is<PHONE_NUMBER>.
    Instructions: Direct your comments to docket ID number EPA-HQ-OPP-
2007-0328. EPA's policy is that all comments received will be included
in the docket without change and may be made available on-line at
http://www.regulations.gov, including any personal information

provided, unless the comment includes information claimed to be
Confidential Business Information (CBI) or other information whose
disclosure is restricted by statute. Do not submit information that you
consider to be CBI or otherwise protected through regulations.gov or e-
mail. The Federal regulations.gov website is an ``anonymous access''
system, which means EPA will not know your identity or contact
information unless you provide it in the body of your comment. If you
send an e-mail comment directly to EPA without going through
regulations.gov, your e-mail address will be automatically captured and
included as part of the comment that is placed in the docket and made
available on the Internet. If you submit an electronic comment, EPA
recommends that you include your name and other contact information in
the body of your comment and with any disk or CD-ROM you submit. If EPA
cannot read your comment due to technical difficulties and cannot
contact you for clarification, EPA may not be able to consider your
comment. Electronic files should avoid the use of special characters,
any form of encryption, and be free of any defects or viruses.
    Docket: All documents in the docket are listed in the docket index
available in regulations.gov. To access the electronic docket, go to
http://www.regulations.gov, select ``Advanced Search,'' then ``Docket

Search.'' Insert the docket ID number where indicated and select the
``Submit'' button. Follow the instructions on the regulations.gov web
site to view the docket index or access available documents. Although
listed in the index, some information is not publicly available, e.g.,
CBI or other information whose disclosure is restricted by statute.
Certain other material, such as copyrighted material, is not placed on
the Internet and will be publicly available only in hard copy form.
Publicly available docket materials are available either in the
electronic docket at http://www.regulations.gov, or, if only available

in hard copy, at the OPP Regulatory Public Docket in Rm. S-4400, One
Potomac Yard (South Bldg.), 2777 S. Crystal Dr., Arlington, VA. The
hours of operation of this Docket Facility are from 8:30 a.m. to 4
p.m., Monday through Friday, excluding legal holidays. The Docket
Facility telephone number is<PHONE_NUMBER>.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Jim Roelofs, Field and External
Affairs Division, Office of Pesticide Programs, Environmental
Protection Agency, 1200 Pennsylvania Ave., NW., Washington, DC 20460-
0001; telephone number:<PHONE_NUMBER>; fax number:<PHONE_NUMBER>; e-
mail<EMAIL_ADDRESS>
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

I. General Information

A. Does this Action Apply to Me?

    This action is directed to the public in general. Although this
action may be of particular interest to those persons who are required
to register, regulate, or label pesticides, the Agency has not
attempted to describe all the specific entities that may be affected by
this action. If you have any questions regarding the information in
this notice, consult the person listed under FOR FURTHER INFORMATION
CONTACT.

B. What Should I Consider as I Prepare My Comments for EPA?

    1. Submitting CBI. Do not submit this information to EPA through
regulations.gov or e-mail. Clearly mark the part or all of the
information that you claim to be CBI. For CBI information in a disk or
CD ROM that you mail to EPA, mark the outside of the disk or CD ROM as
CBI and then identify electronically within the disk or CD ROM the
specific information that is claimed as CBI. In addition to one
complete version of the comment that includes information claimed as
CBI, a copy of the comment that does not contain the information
claimed as CBI must be submitted for inclusion in the public docket.
Information so marked will not be disclosed except in accordance with
procedures set forth in 40 CFR part 2.
    2. Tips for preparing your comments. When submitting comments,
remember to:
    i. Identify the document by docket ID number and other identifying
information (subject heading, Federal Register date, and page number).
    ii. Follow directions. The Agency may ask you to respond to
specific questions or organize comments by referencing a Code of
Federal Regulations (CFR) part or section number.
    iii. Explain why you agree or disagree; suggest alternatives and
substitute language for your requested changes.
    iv. Describe any assumptions and provide any technical information
and/or data that you used.
    v. If you estimate potential costs or burdens, explain how you
arrived at your estimate in sufficient detail to allow for it to be
reproduced.
    vi. Provide specific examples to illustrate your concerns and
suggest alternatives.
    vii. Explain your views as clearly as possible, avoiding the use of
profanity or personal threats.
    viii. Make sure to submit your comments by the comment period
deadline identified.
    3. Specific questions for comment. i. The proposed statements are
intended to give clear, practical instructions for the ordinary
consumer, and to state a reason for following the instructions. Are
there terms in the statements that are ambiguous or subject to
interpretation, which could potentially confuse an untrained user?
    ii. Three of the four categories (liquid concentrate, dust, and
liquid ready-to-use) should not be applied in winds that would cause
the product to drift to unintended areas. Since a home user can not be
presumed to have any means of knowing actual wind speed at the time of
application, what directions regarding wind would be most helpful?
    a. The proposed environmental hazard statement to minimize the
potential for drift reads: ``[Do not] apply when wind is strong enough
to carry spray away from treatment area.'' Is that a clear, practical
instruction?
    b. The alternative statement to minimize drift incorporates the
Beaufort scale (http://www.ncdc.noaa.gov/oa/climate/conversion/beaufortland.html
). The Beaufort scale a system for

estimating wind strengths without the use of instruments. For wind
speeds that could affect application of residential products, the
visual effects according to the Beaufort scale for a moderate breeze of
13 to18 miles per hour would be that small branches on trees are
moving. Is this a practical indicator of when not to use a product? Is
the phrase ``Do not apply when wind is strong enough to move small
branches on trees, as wind will carry spray away from treatment area''
preferable to ``Do not apply when wind is strong enough to carry spray
away from treatment area''?

II. What Action is the Agency Taking?

    EPA is recommending that registrants of outdoor residential use
pesticides revise Environmental Hazard Statements on product labels.
This action is voluntary and may be done through notification. As this
is voluntary, no Agency action will be taken.

List of Subjects

    Environmental protection, Administrative practice and procedure,
Environmental Hazard Statements, Pesticides and pest Residential.

    Dated: September 25, 2007.
Debra Edwards,
Director, Office of Pesticide Programs.
[FR Doc. E7-19448 Filed 10-2-07; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 6560-50-S


[Federal Register: April 11, 2006 (Volume 71, Number 69)]
[Notices]
[Page 18392]
[DOCID:fr11ap06-146]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

[File No. 500-1]

In the Matter of KSW Industries, Inc.; Order of Suspension of
Trading

April 7, 2006.
    It appears to the Securities and Exchange Commission
(``Commission'') that there is a lack of current and accurate
information concerning the securities of KSW Industries, Inc. (``KSW
Industries'') because of questions regarding the accuracy of assertions
by KSW Industries in statements made to investors concerning, among
other things: (1) The identity of KSW Industries' current chief
executive officer and president; and (2) its business activities,
including a joint venture it purportedly entered into in or about
November 2005, a letter of intent it issued in or about February 2006,
and negotiations it entered into in or about March 2006 to license the
company's purported EM-100 process.
    The Commission is of the opinion that the public interest and the
protection of investors require a suspension of trading in the
securities of the above-listed company.
    Therefore, it is ordered, pursuant to Section 12(k) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934, that trading in the above-listed
company is suspended for the period from 9:30 a.m. EDT, April 7, 2006
through 11:59 p.m. EDT, on April 21, 2006.

    By the Commission.

J. Lynn Taylor,
Assistant Secretary.
[FR Doc. 06-3484 Filed 4-7-06; 11:34 am]

BILLING CODE 8010-01-P