From: Ross, Sarah M<EMAIL_ADDRESS>
Sent: Tuesday, May 01, 2012 5:38 PM

To: PPSURVEY

Subject: RE: NEI Site ID #54342 RTR Data Revisions for Georgia-Pacific,
LLC - Crossett Paper Operations, Crossett, Arkansas

I would not delete those records as the units are not completely
captured by the HVLC system (i.e. SSM).  Thanks!

From: PPSURVEY<EMAIL_ADDRESS>
Sent: Tuesday, May 01, 2012 10:11 AM

To: Ross, Sarah M.

Subject: RE: NEI Site ID #54342 RTR Data Revisions for Georgia-Pacific,
LLC - Crossett Paper Operations, Crossett, Arkansas

Thanks for responding.  We have made the revisions to SN76 (Black
Liquor Storage Basin) as suggested, but have some additional questions
about SN61 (Line 2 Decker).  The ICR response for GP-Crossett indicates
that the Line 2 Decker is vented to the HVLC system, which suggests that
the Line 2 Decker emissions in the NEI emissions file may already be
accounted for in the NEI emissions for the thermal oxidizer that
incinerates the HVLC vent gases.  The same goes for the brown stock
washer emissions and digester emissions in the NEI emissions file.
They also appear to be collected in a vent gas collection system and
sent to the thermal oxidizer.  Should we remove the records for the
deckers, brown stock washers, and digesters if they are already
accounted for elsewhere, in order to avoid any double-counting of
emissions for this facility?

Thanks.

Thomas Holloway

RTI International

  HYPERLINK<EMAIL_ADDRESS><EMAIL_ADDRESS>
1-877-834-7065


[Federal Register Volume 76, Number 245 (Wednesday, December 21, 2011)]
[Notices]
[Pages 79268-79270]
[FR Doc No: 2011-32663]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

[Release No. 34-65969; File No. SR-NASDAQ-2011-169]

Self-Regulatory Organizations; The NASDAQ Stock Market LLC;
Notice of Filing and Immediate Effectiveness of Proposed Rule Change
Relating to Extension of the Exchange's Penny Pilot Program and
Replacement of Penny Pilot Issues That Have Been Delisted

 December 15, 2011.
    Pursuant to Section 19(b)(1) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934
(``Act''),\1\ and Rule 19b-4 thereunder,\2\ notice is hereby given that
on December 2, 2011, The NASDAQ Stock Market LLC (the ``Exchange'' or
``Nasdaq'') filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission
(``Commission'') the proposed rule change as described in Items I and
II below, which Items have been prepared by the Exchange. The
Commission is publishing this notice to solicit comments on the
proposed rule change from interested persons.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \1\ 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(1).
    \2\ 17 CFR 240.19b-4.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

I. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement of the Terms of Substance
of the Proposed Rule Change

    Nasdaq is filing with the Securities and Exchange Commission
(``SEC'' or ``Commission'') a proposal for the NASDAQ Options Market
(``NOM'' or ``Exchange'') to amend Chapter VI, Section 5 (Minimum
Increments) to: Extend through June 30, 2012, the Penny Pilot Program
in options classes in certain issues (``Penny Pilot'' or ``Pilot'');
and replace any Penny Pilot issues that have been delisted.\3\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \3\ The Penny Pilot was established in March 2008 and in October
2009 was expanded and extended through December 31, 2010. See
Securities Exchange Act Release Nos. 57579 (March 28, 2008), 73 FR
18587 (April 4, 2008) (SR-NASDAQ-2008-026) (notice of filing and
immediate effectiveness establishing Penny Pilot); 60874 (October
23, 2009), 74 FR 56682 (November 2, 2009) (SR-NASDAQ-2009-091)
(notice of filing and immediate effectiveness expanding and
extending Penny Pilot); 60965 (November 9, 2009), 74 FR 59292
(November 17, 2009) (SR-NASDAQ-2009-097) (notice of filing and
immediate effectiveness adding seventy-five classes to Penny Pilot);
61455 (February 1, 2010), 75 FR 6239 (February 8, 2010) (SR-NASDAQ-
2010-013) (notice of filing and immediate effectiveness adding
seventy-five classes to Penny Pilot); 62029 (May 4, 2010), 75 FR
25895 (May 10, 2010) (SR-NASDAQ-2010-053) (notice of filing and
immediate effectiveness adding seventy-five classes to Penny Pilot);
62617 (July 30, 2010), 75 FR 47670 (August 6, 2010) (SR-NASDAQ-2010-
092) (notice of filing and immediate effectiveness adding seventy-
five classes to Penny Pilot); and 63396 (November 30, 2010), 75 FR
76064 (December 7, 2010) (SR-NASDAQ-2010-150) (notice of filing and
immediate effectiveness extending the Penny Pilot).

---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    The text of the amended Exchange rule is set forth immediately
below. Proposed new language is in italics and proposed deleted
language is [bracketed].\4\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \4\ Changes are marked to the rules of The NASDAQ Stock Market
LLC found at http://nasdaqomx.cchwallstreet.com.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

* * * * *
Chapter VI
Sec. 5 Minimum Increments
    (a) The Board may establish minimum quoting increments for options
contracts traded on NOM. Such minimum increments established by the
Board will be designated as a stated policy, practice, or
interpretation with respect to the administration of this Section
within the meaning of Section 19 of the Exchange Act and will be filed
with the SEC as a rule change for effectiveness upon filing. Until such
time as the Board makes a change in the increments, the following
principles shall apply:
    (1)-(2) No Change.
    (3) For a pilot period scheduled to expire on [December 31,
2011]June 30, 2012, if the options series is trading pursuant to the
Penny Pilot program one (1) cent if the options series is trading at
less than $3.00, five (5) cents if the options series is trading at
$3.00 or higher, unless for QQQQs, SPY and IWM where the minimum
quoting increment will be one cent for all series regardless of price.
A list of such options shall be communicated to membership via an
Options Trader Alert (``OTA'') posted on the Exchange's Web site.
    The Exchange may replace any pilot issues that have been delisted
with the next most actively traded multiply listed options classes that
are not yet included in the pilot, based on trading activity [in the
previous six months]for the six month period beginning June 1, 2011,
and ending November 30, 2011. The replacement issues may be added to
the pilot on the second trading day following January 1, [2011 and July
1, 2011]2012.
    (b) No Change.
* * * * *
    The text of the proposed rule change is available from Nasdaq's Web
site at http://nasdaq.cchwallstreet.com, at Nasdaq's principal office,
and at the Commission's Public Reference Room.

II. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement of the Purpose of, and
Statutory Basis for, the Proposed Rule Change

    In its filing with the Commission, the Exchange included statements
concerning the purpose of and basis for the proposed rule change and
discussed any comments it received on the proposed rule change. The
text of these statements may be examined at the places specified in
Item IV below. Nasdaq has prepared summaries, set forth in Sections A,
B, and C below, of the most significant parts of such statements.

A. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement of the Purpose of, and the
Statutory Basis for, the Proposed Rule Change

1. Purpose
    The purpose of this filing is to amend Chapter VI, Section 5 to
extend the Penny Pilot through June 30, 2012 and replace any Penny
Pilot issues that have been delisted.
    For a pilot period scheduled to expire on December 31, 2011, the
Penny Pilot allows certain options to be quoted and traded on the
Exchange in minimum increments of $0.01 for all series in such options
with a price of less than $3.00; and in minimum increments of $0.05 for
all series in such options with a price of $3.00 or higher. Options
overlying the PowerShares QQQ Trust (``QQQQ'')[supreg], SPDR S&P 500
Exchange Traded Funds (``SPY''), and iShares Russell 2000 Index Funds
(``IWM''), however, are quoted and traded in minimum increments of
$0.01 for all series regardless of the price. Currently the Exchange
trades 361 options classes pursuant to the Penny Pilot.
    The Penny Pilot is a very successful and efficacious pricing
program that is beneficial to traders, investors, and public customers,
and the Exchange has received numerous requests to expand and continue
it. This proposal allows the Penny Pilot to continue in its current
format for six months through June 30, 2012.
    Commensurate with the extension of the Penny Pilot through June 30,
2012, the Exchange proposes to replace any Penny Pilot issues that have
been delisted with the next most actively traded multiply listed
options classes that are not yet included in the Pilot, The replacement
issues will be selected based on trading activity for the six month
period beginning June 1, 2011, and ending November 30, 2011. The
replacement issues would be added to the Pilot on the second trading
day following January 1, 2012.\5\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \5\ The replacement issues will be announced to the Exchange's
membership via an OTA posted on the Exchange's web site.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    In conjunction with this extension proposal, the Exchange agrees to
submit a report to the Commission regarding the Penny Pilot that will
include: (1) Best Bid or Offer (``BBO'') spread, in terms of data and
analysis on the number of quotations generated for options included in
the report; (2) size of BBO, in terms of an assessment of the quotation
spreads for the options included in the report; (3) industry Average
Daily Volume (``ADV''), in terms of data reflecting the size and depth
of markets; (4) an assessment of the impact of the Pilot Program on the
capacity of Phlx's automated systems; and (5) any capacity problems or
other problems that arose related to the operation of the Pilot Program
and how the Exchange addressed them.
2. Statutory Basis
    The Exchange believes that its proposal is consistent with Section
6(b) of the Act \6\ in general, and furthers the objectives of Section
6(b)(5) of the Act \7\ in particular, in that it is designed to prevent
fraudulent and manipulative acts and practices, to promote just and
equitable principles of trade, to foster cooperation and coordination
with persons engaged in facilitating transactions in securities, and to
remove impediments to and perfect the mechanisms of a free and open
market and a national market system, by extending the Penny Pilot and
replacing delisted Penny Pilot issues.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \6\ 15 U.S.C. 78f(b).
    \7\ 15 U.S.C. 78f(b)(5).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    The Exchange notes that the Penny Pilot is a very successful and
efficacious pricing program that is beneficial to traders, investors,
and public customers, and the Exchange has received numerous requests
to expand and continue it. This proposal allows the Penny Pilot to
continue in its current format through June 30, 2012.

B. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement on Burden on Competition

    Nasdaq does not believe that the proposed rule change will result
in any burden on competition that is not necessary or appropriate in
furtherance of the purposes of the Act.

C. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement on Comments on the Proposed
Rule Change Received From Members, Participants, or Others

    Written comments were neither solicited nor received.

III. Date of Effectiveness of the Proposed Rule Change and Timing for
Commission Action

    Because the foregoing proposed rule change does not: (i)
Significantly affect the protection of investors or the public
interest; (ii) impose any significant burden on competition; and (iii)
become operative for 30 days from the date on which it was filed, or
such shorter time as the Commission may designate, it has become
effective pursuant to Section 19(b)(3)(A) of the Act \8\ and Rule 19b-
4(f)(6)(iii) thereunder.\9\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \8\ 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(3)(A).
    \9\ 17 CFR 240.19b-4(f)(6)(iii). In addition, Rule 19b-4(f)(6)
requires a self-regulatory organization to give the Commission
written notice of its intent to file the proposed rule change at
least five business days prior to the date of filing of the proposed
rule change, or such shorter time as designated by the Commission.
The Exchange has satisfied this requirement.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    At any time within 60 days of the filing of the proposed rule
change, the Commission summarily may temporarily suspend such rule
change if it appears to the Commission that such action is necessary or
appropriate in the public interest, for the protection of investors, or
otherwise in furtherance of the purposes of the Act.

IV. Solicitation of Comments

    Interested persons are invited to submit written data, views, and
arguments concerning the foregoing, including whether the proposed rule
change is consistent with the Act. Comments may be submitted by any of
the following methods:

Electronic Comments

     Use the Commission's Internet comment form (http://www.sec.gov/rules/sro.shtml); or
     Send an email to<EMAIL_ADDRESS>Please include
File No. SR-NASDAQ-2011-169 on the subject line.

Paper Comments

     Send paper comments in triplicate to Elizabeth M. Murphy,
Secretary, Securities and Exchange Commission, 100 F Street NE.,
Washington, DC 20549-1090.

All submissions should refer to File No. SR-NASDAQ-2011-169. This file
number should be included on the subject line if email is used. To help
the Commission process and review your comments more efficiently,
please use only one method. The Commission will post all comments on
the Commission's Internet Web site (http://www.sec.gov/rules/sro.shtml). Copies of the submission, all subsequent amendments, all
written statements with respect to the proposed rule change that are
filed with the Commission, and all written communications relating to
the proposed rule change between the Commission and any person, other
than those that may be withheld from the public in accordance with the
provisions of 5 U.S.C. 552, will be available for Web site viewing and
printing in the Commission's Public Reference Room, 100 F Street NE.,
Washington, DC 20549, on official business days between the hours of 10
a.m. and 3 p.m. Copies of such filing also will be available for
inspection and copying at the principal office of the Exchange. All
comments received will be posted without change; the Commission does
not edit personal identifying information from submissions. You should
submit only information that you wish to make available publicly. All
submissions should refer to File No. SR-NASDAQ-2011-169 and should be
submitted on or before January 11, 2012.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \10\ 17 CFR 200.30-3(a)(12).

    For the Commission, by the Division of Trading and Markets,
pursuant to delegated authority.\10\
Kevin M. O'Neill,
Deputy Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2011-32663 Filed 12-20-11; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 8011-01-P


[Federal Register Volume 86, Number 177 (Thursday, September 16, 2021)]
[Notices]
[Pages 51719-51720]
[FR Doc No: 2021-19974]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION

Office of the Secretary

[Docket No. DOT-OST-2021-0106]

America's Supply Chains and the Transportation Industrial Base

ACTION: Notice of request for information.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: On February 24, 2021, President Biden issued an Executive
Order, ``America's Supply Chains,'' which directs several Federal
agency actions to secure and strengthen America's supply chains. On
June 8, 2021, the President also established a Supply Chain Disruptions
Task Force--co-chaired by the Secretaries of Transportation,
Agriculture, and Commerce--to address near term supply chain
challenges, with a focus on alleviating bottlenecks and supply
constraints in the transportation sector, particularly for ports, rail,
and trucking. The Executive Order requires the Secretary of
Transportation to submit, within one year, a report to the President on
supply chains for the transportation industrial base. DOT's one-year
assessment will build off the work of the Supply Chains Disruption Task
Force and focus on the freight and logistics sector, with the goal of
strengthening resilience among transportation supply chains. This
notice requests information from the public to assist the Department of
Transportation in preparing the report required by the Executive Order
and solicits practical solutions from a broad range of stakeholders to
address current and future challenges to supply chain resilience in the
freight and logistics sector.

DATES: Comments must be received on or before October 18, 2021. DOT
will consider comments filed after this date to the extent practicable.

ADDRESSES: You may submit comments identified by Docket Number DOT-OST-
2021-0106 by any of the following methods:
     Electronic Submission: Go to http://www.regulations.gov.
Search by using the docket number (provided above). Follow the
instructions for submitting comments on the electronic docket site.
     Mail: Docket Management Facility; U.S. Department of
Transportation, 1200 New Jersey Avenue SE, West Building, Ground Floor
(W12-140), Washington, DC 20590-0001.
     Hand Delivery: W12-140 of the Department of
Transportation, 1200 New Jersey Avenue SE, Washington, DC, between 9
a.m. and 5 p.m., Monday through Friday, except Federal Holidays.
    Instructions: All submissions must include the agency name and
docket numbers.

    Note:  All comments received, including any personal
information, will be posted without change to the docket and is
accessible via http://www.regulations.gov. Input submitted online
via www.regulations.gov is not immediately posted to the site. It
may take several business days before your submission is posted.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Ryan Endorf at<EMAIL_ADDRESS>or
at<PHONE_NUMBER>.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Background: On February 24, 2021, President
Biden issued Executive Order 14017, ``America's Supply Chains'' (86 FR
11849) (E.O. 14017). E.O. 14017 focuses on the need for resilient,
diverse, and secure supply chains to ensure U.S. economic prosperity
and national security. Such supply chains are needed to address
conditions that can reduce critical manufacturing capacity and the
availability and integrity of critical goods, products, and services.
Section 4 of E.O. 14017 directs that within one year, the Secretary of
Transportation shall submit a report to the President, through the
Assistant to the President for National Security Affairs (APNSA) and
the Assistant to the President for Economic Policy (APEP), on supply
chains for the transportation industrial base. Per the Executive Order,
the Secretary shall determine what constitutes the ``transportation
industrial base'' for purposes of the report. President Biden has also
established a Supply Chain Disruptions Task Force--co-chaired by the
Secretaries of Transportation, Agriculture, and Commerce--to address
near term supply chain challenges, with a focus on alleviating
bottlenecks and supply constraints in the transportation sector,
particularly for ports, rail, and trucking.
    The transportation industry in the U.S. is both vast and varied and
underpins much of the economic activity that takes place in other
sectors. It includes both the vehicles required to move goods and
people and the roads, rails, waterways, and airways over which those
vehicles travel. It includes cargo and passenger terminals that provide
for the transfer of people and goods between vehicles and modes. It
includes the control and information systems that allow the network to
operate smoothly and efficiently and enable users to make the most
advantageous choices about their use of that network. It includes
public and private providers of transportation services and the
operation of privately owned personal vehicles.
    In fulfilling this requirement, the Department intends to produce a
report on the Nation's freight and logistics sector, focused on how the
freight system supports supply chains and any challenges and resilience
issues within that system. DOT has heard from many stakeholders about
issues related to bottlenecks on highways, rail, and at ports, as well
as severe container/chassis shortages and lack of adequate warehousing
capacity, particularly around the nation's largest ports. The
resiliency of the freight system is also a key aspect of supply chain
resiliency across the rest of the economy, including the critical
products being addressed in the one-year reports being developed by
other agencies.

    The Department is currently engaged with stakeholders and public
agency partners in addressing current issues in freight and logistics
through President' Biden's Supply Chain Disruptions Task Force. DOT's
E.O. 14017 report will build on those efforts, focusing on challenges
and solutions over the medium and longer term while also addressing
DOT's goals of safety, economic strength, climate resilience, equity,
and transformation.
    This notice requests comments and information from the public to
assist the Department of Transportation in preparing the report
required by E.O. 14017. In developing this report, the Secretary will
consult with the heads of appropriate agencies, and will be assisted by
the relevant operating administrations of the Department of
Transportation.

Written Comments

    The Department seeks information from the public on the current
challenges faced within the freight and logistics sector, including,
but not limited to, the following topics:
    1. The identification of major infrastructure or operational
bottlenecks and chokepoints across all aspects of the freight and
logistics supply chain--including shipping/receiving, intermodal
transfer, rail/water/truck transportation, warehousing, etc.--that slow
or impede efficient cargo movement within the freight and logistics
sector, and the most effective investments and management practice
improvements that could be made to alleviate those bottlenecks.
    2. Current and potential future shortages and/or distribution
limitations of essential cargo-handling equipment, such as chassis and
shipping containers, and how these challenges can be or are likely to
be addressed by the freight and logistics industry over both the medium
and longer term.
    3. Warehouse capacity and availability, and any challenges faced in
operating and siting/constructing those facilities, as well as
challenges faced by third-party logistics service providers and other
stakeholders in the logistic system.
    4. Major risks to resilience within the freight and logistics
sector (including defense, intelligence, cyber, homeland security,
health, climate, environmental, natural, market, economic,
geopolitical, human-rights, or labor-management risks). What factors
help to mitigate, or conversely exacerbate, these risks?
    5. The effects of climate change on transportation and logistics
infrastructure and its implications for supply chain resiliency.
    6. Technology issues, including information systems, cybersecurity
risks, and interoperability, that affect the safe, efficient, and
reliable movement of goods. Would greater standardization of those
technologies help address those challenges?
    7. Key opportunities and challenges with respect to the existing
and future workforce to ensure a well-functioning freight and logistics
supply chain and achieve the President's goal of increasing good-paying
jobs with the choice of a union. Are there additional workforce or
skill set opportunities and needs currently, or expected in the future?
    8. Current barriers (including statutory, regulatory,
technological, institutional, labor and workforce, management, existing
business models/practices issues) that inhibit supply chain
performance. For any barriers identified, please address the actors
involved and potential outcomes should those barriers be removed.
    9. Critical assets that the sector relies upon and their expected
future availability. Would increasing domestic production of these
assets be desirable or feasible as a means of ensuring greater supply
chain resiliency (chassis, containers, etc.)?
    10. Technological practices, including data sharing, that are being
implemented at various levels across the supply chain sector. What are
the upsides, challenges, and drawbacks of further adoption?
    11. Actions that DOT or other agencies in the U.S. Government (USG)
could take under existing authorities or in partnership with States,
local governments, the private sector, or labor to address current and
evolving challenges within the freight and logistics sector.
    12. Other policy recommendations or suggested executive,
legislative, or regulatory changes to ensure a resilient supply chain
that DOT/USG should consider, including means to collaborate more
effectively across government agencies and suggestions based on state
and international models.
    13. Recommended actions by non-Federal entities, including State
and local governments, private firms, labor, and other participants in
the freight and logistics sector that could be encouraged by DOT/USG.

    Dated: September 10, 2021.
Michael Shapiro,
Deputy Assistant Secretary for Economic Policy.
[FR Doc. 2021-19974 Filed 9-15-21; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910-9X-P


[Federal Register Volume 87, Number 165 (Friday, August 26, 2022)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Pages 52439-52441]
[FR Doc No: 2022-18341]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION

Federal Aviation Administration

14 CFR Part 71

[Docket No. FAA-2022-0714; Airspace Docket No. 22-AGL-23]
RIN 2120-AA66

Amendment of Class D and Class E Airspace; Mansfield, OH

AGENCY: Federal Aviation Administration (FAA), DOT.

ACTION: Final rule.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: This action amends the Class D and Class E airspace at
Mansfield, OH. The FAA is taking this action due to a biennial airspace
review. The geographic coordinates of the Mansfield VORTAC are also
being updated to coincide with the FAA's aeronautical database.

DATES: Effective 0901 UTC, November 3, 2022. The Director of the
Federal Register approves this incorporation by reference action under
1 CFR part 51, subject to the annual revision of FAA Order JO 7400.11
and publication of conforming amendments.

ADDRESSES: FAA Order JO 7400.11F, Airspace Designations and Reporting
Points, and subsequent amendments can be viewed online at www.faa.gov/air_traffic/publications/. For further information, you can contact the
Airspace Policy Group, Federal Aviation Administration, 800
Independence Avenue SW, Washington, DC 20591; telephone: (202) 267-
8783.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Jeffrey Claypool, Federal Aviation
Administration, Operations Support Group, Central Service Center, 10101
Hillwood Parkway, Fort Worth, TX 76177; telephone<PHONE_NUMBER>.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

Authority for This Rulemaking

    The FAA's authority to issue rules regarding aviation safety is
found in Title 49 of the United States Code. Subtitle I, Section 106
describes the authority of the FAA Administrator. Subtitle VII,
Aviation Programs, describes in more detail the scope of the agency's
authority. This rulemaking is promulgated under the authority

described in Subtitle VII, Part A, Subpart I, Section 40103. Under that
section, the FAA is charged with prescribing regulations to assign the
use of airspace necessary to ensure the safety of aircraft and the
efficient use of airspace. This regulation is within the scope of that
authority as it amends the Class D airspace, the Class E surface
airspace, and the Class E airspace extending upward from 700 feet above
the surface at Mansfield Lahm Municipal Airport, Mansfield, OH, to
support instrument flight rule operations at this airport.

History

    The FAA published a notice of proposed rulemaking in the Federal
Register (87 FR 35470; June 10, 2022) for Docket No. FAA-2022-0714 to
amend the Class D and Class E airspace at Mansfield, OH. Interested
parties were invited to participate in this rulemaking effort by
submitting written comments on the proposal to the FAA. No comments
were received.
    Class D and E airspace designations are published in paragraphs
5000, 6002, and 6005, respectively, of FAA Order JO 7400.11F, dated
August 10, 2021, and effective September 15, 2021, which is
incorporated by reference in 14 CFR 71.1. The Class D and E airspace
designations listed in this document will be published subsequently in
FAA Order JO 7400.11.

Availability and Summary of Documents for Incorporation by Reference

    This document amends FAA Order JO 7400.11F, Airspace Designations
and Reporting Points, dated August 10, 2021, and effective September
15, 2021. FAA Order JO 7400.11F is publicly available as listed in the
ADDRESSES section of this document. FAA Order JO 7400.11F lists Class
A, B, C, D, and E airspace areas, air traffic service routes, and
reporting points.

The Rule

    This amendment to 14 CFR part 71:
    Amends the Class D airspace at Mansfield Lahm Municipal Airport,
Mansfield, OH, by removing the Mansfield VORTAC and associated
extension from the airspace legal description as they are no longer
needed; and replaces the outdated terms ``Notice to Airmen'' with
``Notice to Air Missions'' and ``Airport/Facility Directory'' with
``Chart Supplement'';
    Amends the Class E surface airspace at Mansfield Lahm Municipal
Airport by removing the Mansfield VORTAC and associated extension from
the airspace legal description as they are no longer needed; and adds
missing part-time language to the airspace legal description;
    And amends the Class E airspace extending upward from 700 feet
above the surface at Mansfield Lahm Municipal Airport by removing the
extensions to the southeast, northwest, and southwest of the airport
from the airspace legal description as they are no longer needed;
amends the extension northeast of the airport to within 2 (decreased
from 4) miles each side of the 047[deg] bearing from the airport
extending from the 6.9-mile radius of the airport to 8.9 (decreased
from 11.2) miles northeast of the airport; amends the extension
southeast of the VORTAC to within 9.9 miles northeast and 6.1 miles
southwest (previously 4.4 miles each side) of the Mansfield VORTAC
133[deg] (previously 130[deg]) radial extending from the 6.9-mile
radius of the airport to 19 (increased from 13.8) miles southeast of
the VORTAC; amends the extension northwest of the VORTAC to within 9.9
miles southwest and 6.1 miles northeast (previously 6.1 miles each
side) of the Mansfield VORTAC 310[deg] (previously 307[deg]) radial
extending from the 6.9-mile radius of the airport to 10 (decreased from
13.3) miles northwest of the VORTAC; removes the cities associated with
the airports in the airspace legal description to comply with changes
to FAA Order JO 7400.2N, Procedures for Handling Airspace Matters; and
updates the geographic coordinates of the Mansfield VORTAC to coincide
with the FAA's aeronautical database.
    This action is due to a biennial airspace review.
    FAA Order JO 7400.11, Airspace Designations and Reporting Points,
is published yearly and effective on September 15.

Regulatory Notices and Analyses

    The FAA has determined that this regulation only involves an
established body of technical regulations for which frequent and
routine amendments are necessary to keep them operationally current, is
non-controversial and unlikely to result in adverse or negative
comments. It, therefore: (1) is not a ``significant regulatory action''
under Executive Order 12866; (2) is not a ``significant rule'' under
DOT Regulatory Policies and Procedures (44 FR 11034; February 26,
1979); and (3) does not warrant preparation of a regulatory evaluation
as the anticipated impact is so minimal. Since this is a routine matter
that only affects air traffic procedures and air navigation, it is
certified that this rule, when promulgated, does not have a significant
economic impact on a substantial number of small entities under the
criteria of the Regulatory Flexibility Act.

Environmental Review

    The FAA has determined that this action qualifies for categorical
exclusion under the National Environmental Policy Act in accordance
with FAA Order 1050.1F, ``Environmental Impacts: Policies and
Procedures,'' paragraph 5-6.5.a. This airspace action is not expected
to cause any potentially significant environmental impacts, and no
extraordinary circumstances exist that warrant preparation of an
environmental assessment.

Lists of Subjects in 14 CFR 71

    Airspace, Incorporation by reference, Navigation (air).

Adoption of the Amendment

    In consideration of the foregoing, the Federal Aviation
Administration amends 14 CFR part 71 as follows:

PART 71--DESIGNATION OF CLASS A, B, C, D, AND E AIRSPACE AREAS; AIR
TRAFFIC SERVICE ROUTES; AND REPORTING POINTS

0
1. The authority citation for part 71 continues to read as follows:

    Authority:  49 U.S.C. 106(f), 106(g); 40103, 40113, 40120; E.O.
10854, 24 FR 9565, 3 CFR, 1959-1963 Comp., p. 389.

Sec.  71.1  [Amended]

0
2. The incorporation by reference in 14 CFR 71.1 of FAA Order JO
7400.11F, Airspace Designations and Reporting Points, dated August 10,
2021, and effective September 15, 2021, is amended as follows:

Paragraph 5000 Class D Airspace.

* * * * *

AGL OH D Mansfield, OH [Amended]

Mansfield Lahm Municipal Airport, OH
    (Lat. 40[deg]49'17'' N, long. 82[deg]31'00'' W)

    That airspace extending from the surface to and including 3,800
feet MSL within a 4.4-mile radius of the Mansfield Lahm Airport.
This Class D airspace area is effective during the specific dates
and times established in advance by Notice to Air Missions. The
effective dates and times will thereafter be continuously published
in the Chart Supplement.

Paragraph 6002 Class E Airspace Areas Designated as Surface Areas.

* * * * *

AGL OH E2 Mansfield, OH [Amended]

Mansfield Lahm Regional Airport, OH
    (Lat. 40[deg]49'17'' N, long. 82[deg]31'00'' W)

    Within a 4.4-mile radius of Mansfield Lahm Regional Airport.
This Class E airspace area is effective during the specific dates
and

times established in advance by Notice to Air Missions. The
effective dates and times will thereafter be continuously published
in the Chart Supplement.

Paragraph 6005 Class E Airspace Areas Extending Upward From 700
Feet or More Above the Surface of the Earth.

* * * * *

AGL OH E5 Mansfield, OH [Amended]

Mansfield Lahm Regional Airport, OH
    (Lat. 40[deg]49'17'' N, long. 82[deg]31'00'' W)
Galion Municipal Airport, OH
    (Lat. 40[deg]45'12'' N, long. 82[deg]43'26'' W)
Shelby Community Airport, OH
    (Lat. 40[deg]52'22'' N, long. 82[deg]41'51'' W)
Willard Airport, OH
    (Lat. 41[deg]02'20'' N, long. 82[deg]43'28'' W)
Mansfield VORTAC
    (Lat. 40[deg]52'07'' N, long. 82[deg]35'27'' W)

    That airspace extending upward from 700 feet above the surface
within a 6.9-mile radius of Mansfield Lahm Regional Airport; and
within 2 miles each side of the 047[deg] bearing from Mansfield Lahm
Regional Airport extending from the 6.9-mile radius to 8.9 miles
northeast of the airport; and within 9.9 miles northeast and 6.1
miles southwest of the Mansfield VORTAC 133[deg] radial extending
from the 6.9-mile radius of Mansfield Lahm Regional Airport to 19
miles southeast of the Mansfield VORTAC; and within 9.9 miles
southwest and 6.1 miles northeast of the Mansfield VORTAC 310[deg]
radial extending from the 6.9-mile radius of Mansfield Lahm Regional
Airport to 10 miles northwest of the Mansfield VORTAC; and within a
6.3-mile radius of Galion Municipal Airport, and within a 6.3-mile
radius of Shelby Community Airport, and within a 6.3-mile radius of
Willard Airport.

    Issued in Fort Worth, Texas, on August 22, 2022.
Martin A. Skinner,
Acting Manager, Operations Support Group, ATO Central Service Center.
[FR Doc. 2022-18341 Filed 8-25-22; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910-13-P


[Federal Register Volume 79, Number 4 (Tuesday, January 7, 2014)]
[Notices]
[Pages 823-824]
[FR Doc No: 2014-00014]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission

Combined Notice of Filings

    Take notice that the Commission has received the following Natural
Gas Pipeline Rate and Refund Report filings:

Filings Instituting Proceedings

    Docket Numbers: RP13-1387-000.
    Applicants: Enable Mississippi River Transmission, LLC.
    Description: Submits tariff filing per 154.501: MRT Refund Report
to be effective N/A.
    Filed Date: 12/20/13.
    Accession Number: 20131220-5172.
    Comments Due: 5 p.m. ET 1/2/14.

    Docket Numbers: RP14-326-000.
    Applicants: Gulf South Pipeline Company, LP.
    Description: Amendment to Neg Rate Agmt (Devon 34694-52) to be
effective 12/1/2013.
    Filed Date: 12/30/13.
    Accession Number: 20131230-5047.
    Comments Due: 5 p.m. ET 1/13/14.

    Docket Numbers: RP14-327-000.
    Applicants: Colorado Interstate Gas Company, L.L.C.
    Description: Colorado Interstate Gas Company, L.L.C. submits tariff
filing per 154.403(d)(2): Update of Young Storage Related Fuel
Percentages to be effective 1/1/2014.
    Filed Date: 12/30/13.
    Accession Number: 20131230-5221.
    Comments Due: 5 p.m. ET 1/13/14.

    Docket Numbers: RP72-6-000.
    Applicants: El Paso Natural Gas Company.
    Description: El Paso Natural Gas Company, L.L.C.'s Semi-Annual
Storage Report for Washington Ranch Storage Facility.
    Filed Date: 12/30/13.
    Accession Number: 20131230-5142.
    Comments Due: 5 p.m. ET 1/13/14.

    Docket Numbers: RP14-328-000.
    Applicants: Rockies Express Pipeline LLC.
    Description: Rockies Express Pipeline LLC submits tariff filing per
154.204: Neg Rate 2013-12-31 Sempra, ConocoPhil NC NRA A&R to be
effective 1/1/2014.
    Filed Date: 12/31/13.
    Accession Number: 20131231-5003.
    Comments Due: 5 p.m. ET 1/13/14.

    Docket Numbers: RP14-329-000.
    Applicants: Sea Robin Pipeline Company, LLC.
    Description: Sea Robin Pipeline Company, LLC submits tariff filing
per 154.203: Annual Flowthrough Crediting Mechanism filing on 12/31/13
to be effective N/A.
    Filed Date: 12/31/13.
    Accession Number: 20131231-5057.
    Comments Due: 5 p.m. ET 1/13/14.

    Docket Numbers: RP14-330-000.
    Applicants: Texas Gas Transmission, LLC.
    Description: Texas Gas Transmission, LLC submits tariff filing per
154.204: Amendment to Neg Rate Agmt (Cross Timbers 31115-2) to be
effective 1/1/2014.
    Filed Date: 12/31/13.
    Accession Number: 20131231-5071.
    Comments Due: 5 p.m. ET 1/13/14.

    Docket Numbers: RP14-331-000.
    Applicants: Gulf South Pipeline Company, LP.
    Description: Gulf South Pipeline Company, LP submits tariff filing
per 154.204: Cap Rel Neg Rate Agmt (JW 34690 to Q-West 41781) to be
effective 1/1/2014.
    Filed Date: 12/31/13.
    Accession Number: 20131231-5072.
    Comments Due: 5 p.m. ET 1/13/14.

    Docket Numbers: RP14-332-000.
    Applicants: Iroquois Gas Transmission System, L.P.
    Description: Iroquois Gas Transmission System, L.P. submits tariff
filing per 154.204: 12/31/13 Negotiated Rates--JP Morgan Ventures (RTS)
6025-26 to be effective 1/1/2014.

    Filed Date: 12/31/13.
    Accession Number: 20131231-5079.
    Comments Due: 5 p.m. ET 1/13/14.

    Docket Numbers: RP14-333-000.
    Applicants: Columbia Gas Transmission, LLC.
    Description: Columbia Gas Transmission, LLC submits tariff filing
per 154.403: Environmental Filing 2013 to be effective 2/1/2014.
    Filed Date: 12/31/13.
    Accession Number: 20131231-5091.
    Comments Due: 5 p.m. ET 1/13/14.

    Any person desiring to intervene or protest in any of the above
proceedings must file in accordance with Rules 211 and 214 of the
Commission's Regulations (18 CFR 385.211 and 385.214) on or before 5:00
p.m. Eastern time on the specified comment date. Protests may be
considered, but intervention is necessary to become a party to the
proceeding.

Filings in Existing Proceedings

    Docket Numbers: RP14-268-001.
    Applicants: Iroquois Gas Transmission System, L.P.
    Description: Submits tariff filing per 154.205(b) Negotiated
Rates--JP Morgan Ventures Energy Corp (HUB) to be effective 12/11/2013.
    Filed Date: 12/12/13.
    Accession Number: 20131212-5132.
    Comments Due: 5 p.m. ET 1/3/14.
    Any person desiring to protest in any of the above proceedings must
file in accordance with Rule 211 of the Commission's Regulations (18
CFR 385.211) on or before 5:00 p.m. Eastern time on the specified
comment date.
    The filings are accessible in the Commission's eLibrary system by
clicking on the links or querying the docket number.
    eFiling is encouraged. More detailed information relating to filing
requirements, interventions, protests, service, and qualifying
facilities filings can be found at: http://www.ferc.gov/docs-filing/efiling/filing-req.pdf. For other information, call<PHONE_NUMBER>
(toll free). For TTY, call<PHONE_NUMBER>.

    Dated: December 31, 2013.

Nathaniel J. Davis, Sr.,
 Deputy Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2014-00014 Filed 1-6-14; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6717-01-P [FEDREG][VOL]*[/VOL][NO]*[/NO][DATE]*[/
DATE][NOTICES]


[Federal Register: October 19, 2006 (Volume 71, Number 202)]
[Notices]
[Page 61762-61763]
[DOCID:fr19oc06-83]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission

Notice of Application Ready for Environmental Analysis and
Soliciting Comments, Recommendations, Terms and Conditions, and
Prescriptions

October 13, 2006.
    Take notice that the following hydroelectric application has been
filed with the Commission and is available for public inspection.
    a. Type of Application: Original Major License under 5 megawatts
(MW).
    b. Project No: 11879-002.

    c. Date filed: May 20, 2004.
    d. Applicant: Symbiotics, LLC.
    e. Name of Project: Chester Diversion Hydroelectric Project.
    f. Location: On Henry's Fork of the Snake River, near the Town of
Rexburg, in Fremont County, Idaho.
    g. Filed Pursuant to: Federal Power Act, 16 U.S.C. 791 (a)--825(r).
    h. Applicant Contact: Brent L. Smith, Northwest Power Services,
Inc. P.O. Box 535, Rigby, Idaho 83442,<PHONE_NUMBER>.
    i. FERC Contact: Emily Carter,<PHONE_NUMBER><EMAIL_ADDRESS>    j. Deadline for filing comments, recommendations, terms and
conditions, and prescriptions is 60 days from the issuance of this
notice; reply comments are due 105 days from the issuance date of this
notice.
    All documents (original and eight copies) should be filed with:
Magalie R. Salas, Secretary, Federal Energy Regulatory Commission, 888
First Street, NE., Washington, DC 20426.
    The Commission's Rules of Practice require all intervenors filing
documents with the Commission to serve a copy of that document on each
person on the official service list for the project. Further, if an
intervenor files comments or documents with the Commission relating to
the merits of an issue that may affect the responsibilities of a
particular resource agency, they must also serve a copy of the document
on that resource agency.
    Comments, recommendations, terms and conditions, and prescriptions
may be filed electronically via the Internet in lieu of paper. The
Commission strongly encourages electronic filings. See 18 CFR
385.2001(a)(1)(iii) and the instructions on the Commission's Web site
(http://www.ferc.gov) under the ``e-Filing'' link.

    k. This application has been accepted and is now ready for
environmental analysis.
    l. The Applicant proposes to utilize the existing BOR Chester
Diversion dam on the Henry's Fork of the Snake River. The dam has an
overall structural height of 17 feet and a total length of 457 feet,
spanning the river. Operation of the project would depend on flows in
the Henry's Fork and would be dependent on the irrigation season. It
would be operated run-of-river and no storage would occur at the
project.
    The proposed project would consist of the following facilities: (1)
A new three-foot-high inflatable rubber dam bolted to the crest of the
existing spillway; (2) a new 50-foot-wide concrete spillway; (3) two
new Kaplan-type turbine generator units with a combined generating
capacity of 3.3 MW; (4) a new low-profile powerhouse; and (5)
appurtenant facilities.
    The applicant estimates that the average annual generation would be
about 16.8 gigawatthours.
    m. A copy of the application is available for review at the
Commission in the Public Reference Room or may be viewed on the
Commission's Web site at http://www.ferc.gov using the ``eLibrary''

link. Enter the docket number excluding the last three digits in the
docket number field to access the document. For assistance, contact
FERC Online Support at<EMAIL_ADDRESS>or toll-free at 1-
866-208-3676, or for TTY,<PHONE_NUMBER>. A copy is also available for
inspection and reproduction at the address in item h above.
    All filings must (1) bear in all capital letters the title
``Comments'', ``Reply Comments'', ``Recommendations,'' ``Terms and
Conditions,'' or ``Prescriptions;'' (2) set forth in the heading the
name of the applicant and the project number of the application to
which the filing responds; (3) furnish the name, address, and telephone
number of the person submitting the filing; and (4) otherwise comply
with the requirements of 18 CFR 385.2001 through 385.2005. All
comments, recommendations, terms and conditions or prescriptions must
set forth their evidentiary basis and otherwise comply with the
requirements of 18 CFR 4.34(b). Agencies may obtain copies of the
application directly from the applicant. Each filing must be
accompanied by proof of service on all persons listed on the service
list prepared by the Commission in this proceeding, in accordance with
18 CFR 4.34(b), and 385.2010.
    You may also register online at http://www.ferc.gov/docs-filing/esubscription.asp
 to be notified via e-mail of new filings and

issuances related to this or other pending projects. For assistance,
contact FERC Online Support.
    n. Public notice of the filing of the initial development
application, which has already been given, established the due date for
filing competing applications or notices of intent. Under the
Commission's regulations, any competing development application must be
filed in response to and in compliance with public notice of the
initial development application. No competing applications or notices
of intent may be filed in response to this notice.
    o. Procedural schedule and final amendments: Revisions to the
schedule will be made as appropriate. The schedule given in the
September 6, 2005, Scoping Document 1 is revised as follows:
    Notice that application is ready for environmental analysis (EA):
October 2006.
    Notice of the availability of the EA: March 2007.

Magalie R. Salas,
Secretary.
 [FR Doc. E6-17502 Filed 10-18-06; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 6717-01-P


[Federal Register: October 1, 2010 (Volume 75, Number 190)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Page 60616-60617]
[DOCID:fr01oc10-9]

=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

17 CFR Part 241

[Release No. 34-62991]

Commission Guidance Regarding Auditing, Attestation, and Related
Professional Practice Standards Related To Brokers and Dealers

AGENCY: Securities and Exchange Commission.

ACTION: Interpretation.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Securities and Exchange Commission is publishing
interpretive guidance to clarify the application of certain Commission
rules, regulations, releases, and staff bulletins in light of the
authority granted to the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board in
the Dodd-Frank Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protection Act to
establish auditing, attestation, and related professional practice
standards governing the preparation and issuance of audit reports to be
included in broker and dealer filings with the Commission.

DATES: Effective Date: October 1, 2010.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Questions should be referred to
Rebekah Goshorn (Attorney), Division of Trading and Markets, at (202)
551-5777, or to John Offenbacher (Senior Associate Chief Accountant) or
Jeffrey Cohan (Senior Special Counsel), Office of the Chief Accountant,
at<PHONE_NUMBER>, Securities and Exchange Commission, 100 F Street
NE., Washington, DC 20549-7561.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Section 982 of the Dodd-Frank Wall Street
Reform and Consumer Protection Act \1\ (``Dodd-Frank Act'') amended the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 \2\ (the ``Sarbanes-Oxley Act'') to
authorize the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (``PCAOB''),
among other things, to establish, subject to approval by the

Commission, auditing and related attestation, quality control, ethics,
and independence standards to be used by registered public accounting
firms with respect to the preparation and issuance of audit reports to
be included in broker and dealer filings with the Commission pursuant
to Rule 17a-5 \3\ under the Exchange Act of 1934 \4\ (``Exchange
Act''). The amendments directly impact certain Commission rules,
regulations, releases, and staff bulletins related to brokers and
dealers (collectively referred to in this release as ``Commission rules
and staff guidance'') and certain provisions in the federal securities
laws for brokers and dealers, which refer to Generally Accepted
Auditing Standards (``GAAS'') and to specific standards under GAAS
(including related professional practice standards).\5\ There may be
confusion on the part of brokers, dealers, auditors, and investors with
regard to the professional standards auditors should follow for reports
filed and furnished by brokers and dealers pursuant to the federal
securities laws and the rules of the Commission.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \1\ Dodd-Frank Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protection Act,
Public Law 111-203, 124 Stat. 1376 (2010).
    \2\ 17 U.S.C. 7202 et seq.
    \3\ 17 CFR 240.17a-5.
    \4\ 15 U.S.C. 78a et seq.
    \5\ Many parts of Commission rules and staff guidance related to
obligations of brokers and dealers refer to GAAS and contain
requirements for audits to be conducted in accordance with GAAS.
Rule 17a-5(g)(1) under the Exchange Act, for example, states that
the audit of the report required by Rule 17a-5(d) ``* * * shall be
made in accordance with generally accepted auditing standards * *
*'' (See 17 CFR 240.17a-5) Rule 17a-12 under the Exchange Act
requires that the audit of certain over-the-counter derivative
dealers ``* * * shall be made in accordance with U.S. Generally
Accepted Auditing Standards * * *'' (17 CFR 240.17a-12).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    The Commission is considering a rulemaking project to update the
audit and related attestation requirements under the federal securities
laws for brokers and dealers, particularly in light of the Dodd-Frank
Act. In addition, the PCAOB has not yet revised its rules, which
currently refer only to issuers, to require registered public
accounting firms to comply with PCAOB standards for audits of non-
issuer brokers and dealers.\6\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \6\ See PCAOB Rule 3100. See also, e.g., PCAOB Rules 3200T,
3300T, 3400T, and 3500T.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    As a result, the Commission is providing transitional guidance with
respect to its existing rules regarding non-issuer brokers and dealers.
Specifically, references in Commission rules and staff guidance and in
the federal securities laws to GAAS or to specific standards under
GAAS, as they relate to non-issuer brokers or dealers, should continue
to be understood to mean auditing standards generally accepted in the
United States of America,\7\ plus any applicable rules of the
Commission. The Commission intends, however, to revisit this
interpretation in connection with its rulemaking project referenced
above.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \7\ Audit and attestation standards established by the AICPA.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

 List of Subjects in 17 CFR Part 241

    Brokers, Reporting and recordkeeping reports, Securities.

Amendments to the Code of Federal Regulations

0
For the reasons set forth above, the Commission is amending title 17,
chapter II of the Code of Federal Regulations as set forth below:

PART 241--INTERPRETATIVE RELEASES RELATING TO THE SECURITIES
EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 AND GENERAL RULES AND REGULATIONS THEREUNDER

0
Part 241 is amended by adding Release No. 34-62991 to the list of
interpretive releases as follows:

----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
                Subject                    Release No.               Date               Fed. Reg. vol. and page
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

                                                  * * * * * * *
Commission Guidance Regarding Auditing,        34-62991  September 24, 2010.........  75 FR [INSERT FR PAGE
 Attestation, and Related Professional                                                 NUMBER]
 Practice Standards Related to Brokers
 and Dealers.
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

    By the Commission.
    Dated: September 24, 2010.
Elizabeth M. Murphy,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2010-24657 Filed 9-30-10; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 8010-01-P


[Federal Register: November 20, 2008 (Volume 73, Number 225)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Page 70263-70265]
[DOCID:fr20no08-5]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION

Federal Aviation Administration

14 CFR Part 39

[Docket No. FAA-2008-0270; Directorate Identifier 2007-NM-255-AD;
Amendment 39-15628; AD 2008-16-10]
RIN 2120-AA64

Airworthiness Directives; Gulfstream Aerospace LP Model Galaxy
Airplanes and Gulfstream 200 Airplanes

AGENCY: Federal Aviation Administration (FAA), Department of
Transportation (DOT).

ACTION: Final rule.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: We are adopting a new airworthiness directive (AD) for the
products listed above. This AD results from mandatory continuing
airworthiness information (MCAI) originated by an aviation authority of
another country to identify and correct an unsafe condition on an
aviation product. The MCAI describes the unsafe condition as:

    The 3 supporting blocks [installed on hydraulic tubes] were made
of Teflon, which is unsuitable material for this application.
Excessive wear of the blocks was discovered on numerous aircraft, as
well as several cases of chafing between the loosely supported
tubes. In one case, hydraulic fluid was lost due to fatigue failure
of an inadequately supported tube. Loss of hydraulic fluid causes
subsequent multiple failures of hydraulically operated systems.

Multiple failures of hydraulically operated systems (for the flight air
brake actuators, brake system, right thrust reverser, etc.) could
result in reduced controllability of the airplane. We are issuing this
AD to require actions to correct the unsafe condition on these
products.

DATES: This AD becomes effective December 26, 2008.
    The Director of the Federal Register approved the incorporation by
reference of certain publications listed in this AD as of December 26,
2008.

ADDRESSES: You may examine the AD docket on the Internet at http://
www.regulations.gov or in person at the U.S. Department of
Transportation, Docket Operations, M-30, West Building Ground Floor,
Room W12-140, 1200 New Jersey Avenue, SE., Washington, DC.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Mike Borfitz, Aerospace Engineer,
International Branch, ANM-116, Transport Airplane Directorate, FAA,
1601 Lind Avenue, SW., Renton, Washington 98057-3356; telephone (425)
227-2677; fax<PHONE_NUMBER>.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

Discussion

    We issued a notice of proposed rulemaking (NPRM) to amend 14 CFR
part 39 to include an AD that would apply to the specified products.
That NPRM was published in the Federal Register on March 13, 2008 (73
FR 13490). That NPRM proposed to correct an unsafe condition for the
specified products. The MCAI states:

    The 3 supporting blocks [installed on hydraulic tubes] were made
of Teflon, which is unsuitable material for this application.
Excessive wear of the blocks was discovered on numerous aircraft, as
well as several cases of chafing between the loosely supported
tubes. In one case, hydraulic fluid was lost due to fatigue failure
of an inadequately supported tube. Loss of hydraulic fluid causes
subsequent multiple failures of hydraulically operated systems.

Multiple failures of hydraulically operated systems (for the flight air
brake actuators, brake system, right thrust reverser, etc.) could
result in reduced controllability of the airplane. The corrective
actions include repetitive visual inspections of the attaching blocks
for wear and of the hydraulic tubes to determine if any tube is loose
or damaged; an inspection of the entire length of the tubes for
chafing, damage, and cracking; replacement of chafed, damaged, or
cracked tubes; and replacement of blocks made of Teflon in the right-
hand aft fuselage equipment bay with new blocks made of Nylon 6/6. You
may obtain further information by examining the MCAI in the AD docket.

Comments

    We gave the public the opportunity to participate in developing
this AD. We received no comments on the NPRM or on the determination of
the cost to the public.

Conclusion

    We reviewed the available data and determined that air safety and
the public interest require adopting the AD as proposed.

Changes to Note 1 and Service Information References

    The statement specified in Note 1 of the NPRM is informational only
and is not part of the requirements of this AD. The actions specified
in that statement are required regardless of AD action. We have removed
Note 1 of the NPRM from this AD and revised the numbering on the
subsequent Note in this AD.
    We have revised paragraph (f)(1)(iii) of this AD to clarify that
the repair may be done in accordance with Chapter 20-10-12 of the
Gulfstream G200 Maintenance Manual, Revision 15, dated March 31, 2008.

Differences Between This AD and the MCAI or Service Information

    We have reviewed the MCAI and related service information and, in
general, agree with their substance. But we might have found it
necessary to use different words from those in the MCAI to ensure the
AD is clear for U.S. operators and is enforceable. In making these
changes, we do not intend to differ substantively from the information
provided in the MCAI and related service information.
    We might also have required different actions in this AD from those
in the MCAI in order to follow our FAA policies. Any such differences
are highlighted in a NOTE within the AD.

Costs of Compliance

    We estimate that this AD will affect about 129 products of U.S.
registry. We also estimate that it will take about 2 work-hours per
product to comply with the basic requirements of this AD. The average
labor rate is $80 per work-hour. Required parts will cost about $54 per

product. Where the service information lists required parts costs that
are covered under warranty, we have assumed that there will be no
charge for these parts. As we do not control warranty coverage for
affected parties, some parties may incur costs higher than estimated
here. Based on these figures, we estimate the cost of this AD to the
U.S. operators to be $27,606, or $214 per product.

Authority for This Rulemaking

    Title 49 of the United States Code specifies the FAA's authority to
issue rules on aviation safety. Subtitle I, section 106, describes the
authority of the FAA Administrator. ``Subtitle VII: Aviation
Programs,'' describes in more detail the scope of the Agency's
authority.
    We are issuing this rulemaking under the authority described in
``Subtitle VII, Part A, Subpart III, Section 44701: General
requirements.'' Under that section, Congress charges the FAA with
promoting safe flight of civil aircraft in air commerce by prescribing
regulations for practices, methods, and procedures the Administrator
finds necessary for safety in air commerce. This regulation is within
the scope of that authority because it addresses an unsafe condition
that is likely to exist or develop on products identified in this
rulemaking action.

Regulatory Findings

    We determined that this AD will not have federalism implications
under Executive Order 13132. This AD will not have a substantial direct
effect on the States, on the relationship between the national
government and the States, or on the distribution of power and
responsibilities among the various levels of government.
    For the reasons discussed above, I certify this AD:
    1. Is not a ``significant regulatory action'' under Executive Order
12866;
    2. Is not a ``significant rule'' under the DOT Regulatory Policies
and Procedures (44 FR 11034, February 26, 1979); and
    3. Will not have a significant economic impact, positive or
negative, on a substantial number of small entities under the criteria
of the Regulatory Flexibility Act.
    We prepared a regulatory evaluation of the estimated costs to
comply with this AD and placed it in the AD docket.

Examining the AD Docket

    You may examine the AD docket on the Internet at http://
www.regulations.gov; or in person at the Docket Operations office
between 9 a.m. and 5 p.m., Monday through Friday, except Federal
holidays. The AD docket contains the NPRM, the regulatory evaluation,
any comments received, and other information. The street address for
the Docket Operations office (telephone<PHONE_NUMBER>) is in the
ADDRESSES section. Comments will be available in the AD docket shortly
after receipt.

List of Subjects in 14 CFR Part 39

    Air transportation, Aircraft, Aviation safety, Incorporation by
reference, Safety.

Adoption of the Amendment

0
Accordingly, under the authority delegated to me by the Administrator,
the FAA amends 14 CFR part 39 as follows:

PART 39--AIRWORTHINESS DIRECTIVES

0
1. The authority citation for part 39 continues to read as follows:

    Authority: 49 U.S.C. 106(g), 40113, 44701.

Sec.  39.13  [Amended]

0
2. The FAA amends Sec.  39.13 by adding the following new AD:

2008-16-10 Gulfstream Aerospace LP (Formerly Israel Aircraft
Industries, Ltd.): Amendment 39-15628. Docket No. FAA-2008-0270;
Directorate Identifier 2007-NM-255-AD.

Effective Date

    (a) This airworthiness directive (AD) becomes effective December
26, 2008.

Affected ADs

    (b) None.

Applicability

    (c) This AD applies to Gulfstream Model Galaxy and Gulfstream
200 airplanes, serial numbers 004 through 156, certificated in any
category.

Subject

    (d) Air Transport Association (ATA) of America Code 29:
Hydraulic Power.

Reason

    (e) The mandatory continuing airworthiness information (MCAI)
states:

    The 3 supporting blocks [installed on hydraulic tubes] were made
of Teflon, which is unsuitable material for this application.
Excessive wear of the blocks was discovered on numerous aircraft, as
well as several cases of chafing between the loosely supported
tubes. In one case, hydraulic fluid was lost due to fatigue failure
of an inadequately supported tube. Loss of hydraulic fluid causes
subsequent multiple failures of hydraulically operated systems.

Multiple failures of hydraulically operated systems (for the flight
air brake actuators, brake system, right thrust reverser, etc.)
could result in reduced controllability of the airplane. The
corrective actions include repetitive visual inspections of the
attaching blocks for wear and of the hydraulic tubes to determine if
any tube is loose or damaged; an inspection of the entire length of
the tubes for chafing, damage, and cracking; replacement of chafed,
damaged, or cracked tubes; and replacement of blocks made of Teflon
in the right-hand aft fuselage equipment bay with new blocks made of
Nylon 6/6.

Actions and Compliance

    (f) Do the following actions.
    (1) Unless already done within 300 flight hours or six months
prior to the effective date of this AD: Within 50 flight hours or
one month after the effective date of this AD, whichever occurs
first, perform a visual inspection of the clamping blocks for wear
and of the hydraulic tubes to determine if any tube is loose or
damaged. Clamping blocks are shown in detail B of Figure 2 of
Gulfstream Service Bulletin 200-29-316, dated June 29, 2007; or in
details B and C of Figure 10, Page 0, of Chapter 29-10-30, of the
Gulfstream G200 Illustrated Parts Catalog.
    (i) If clamping blocks are not worn, repeat the inspections
specified in paragraph (f)(1) of this AD thereafter at intervals not
to exceed 300 flight hours or six months, whichever comes first,
until the replacement required by paragraph (f)(2) of this AD is
done.
    (ii) If any hydraulic tube is loose or damaged, before further
flight, inspect the hydraulic tubes along their entire length for
chafing, damage, and cracks.
    (iii) Before further flight, repair or replace all chafed,
damaged, or cracked tubes in accordance with Chapter 20-10-12 of the
Gulfstream G200 Maintenance Manual, Revision 15, dated March 31,
2008; or using a method approved by either the Manager,
International Branch, ANM-116, Transport Airplane Directorate, FAA;
or the Civil Aviation Authority of Israel (CAAI) (or its delegated
agent).
    (iv) Before further flight, replace all worn clamping blocks by
doing the replacement specified in paragraph (f)(2) of this AD,
except as provided by paragraph (f)(1)(v) of this AD.
    (v) If Nylon 6/6 clamping blocks part number (P/N) 4AS3565055-
511 are not available during the replacement specified in paragraph
(f)(1)(iv) of this AD, before further flight, install new or
serviceable Teflon clamping blocks P/N 4AS3565055-507. Within 300
flight hours or six months after doing the installation, do the
actions specified in paragraph (f)(1) of this AD and repeat
thereafter at intervals not to exceed 300 flight hours or six
months, whichever comes first, until the replacement required by
paragraph (f)(2) of this AD is done.
    (2) Unless already done: Within 600 flight hours or one year
after the effective date of this AD, whichever comes first, replace
the existing Teflon clamping blocks P/N 4AS3565055-507 with Nylon 6/
6 clamping blocks P/N 4AS3565055-511 in accordance with Gulfstream
Service Bulletin 200-29-316, dated June 29, 2007. Accomplishment of
this replacement constitutes terminating action for all inspections
of the clamping blocks required by this AD. Accomplishment of this
replacement also constitutes terminating action for the repetitive

inspections of the hydraulic tube required by paragraphs (f)(1)(i)
and (f)(1)(v) of this AD.

FAA AD Differences

    Note 1: This AD differs from the MCAI and/or service information
as follows:
    (1) The MCAI does not specify service information if any tube
replacement is done. This AD requires doing the replacement as
specified in paragraph (f)(1)(iii) of this AD.
    (2) The MCAI specifies doing a one-time inspection of the
installed Teflon blocks but also specifies doing repetitive
inspections of temporary replacement Teflon blocks until the
permanent replacement with Nylon 6/6 clamping blocks is done. This
AD requires repetitive inspections of all Teflon blocks until the
permanent replacement is done.
    (3) The MCAI specifies that doing the replacement with Nylon 6/6
clamping blocks constitutes terminating action. This AD specifies
that doing the replacement with Nylon 6/6 clamping blocks
constitutes terminating action for the inspections of the clamping
blocks and for the repetitive inspections of the hydraulic tubes.

Other FAA AD Provisions

    (g) The following provisions also apply to this AD:
    (1) Alternative Methods of Compliance (AMOCs): The Manager,
International Branch, ANM-116, FAA, has the authority to approve
AMOCs for this AD, if requested using the procedures found in 14 CFR
39.19. Send information to ATTN: Mike Borfitz, Aerospace Engineer,
International Branch, ANM-116, Transport Airplane Directorate, FAA,
1601 Lind Avenue, SW., Renton, Washington 98057-3356; telephone
(425) 227-2677; fax<PHONE_NUMBER>. Before using any approved AMOC
on any airplane to which the AMOC applies, notify your appropriate
principal inspector (PI) in the FAA Flight Standards District Office
(FSDO), or lacking a PI, your local FSDO.
    (2) Airworthy Product: For any requirement in this AD to obtain
corrective actions from a manufacturer or other source, use these
actions if they are FAA-approved. Corrective actions are considered
FAA-approved if they are approved by the State of Design Authority
(or their delegated agent). You are required to assure the product
is airworthy before it is returned to service.
    (3) Reporting Requirements: For any reporting requirement in
this AD, under the provisions of the Paperwork Reduction Act, the
Office of Management and Budget (OMB) has approved the information
collection requirements and has assigned OMB Control Number 2120-
0056.

Related Information

    (h) Refer to MCAI Israeli Airworthiness Directive 29-07-01-11,
dated May 28, 2007; Gulfstream Service Bulletin 200-29-316, dated
June 29, 2007; and Chapter 20-10-12 of the Gulfstream G200
Maintenance Manual, Revision 15, dated March 31, 2008; for related
information.

Material Incorporated by Reference

    (i) You must use Gulfstream Service Bulletin 200-29-316, dated
June 29, 2007; and Chapter 20-10-12 of the Gulfstream G200
Maintenance Manual, Revision 15, dated March 31, 2008; as
applicable, to do the actions required by this AD, unless the AD
specifies otherwise.
    Chapter 20 of the Gulfstream G200 Maintenance Manual, Revision
15, dated March 31, 2008, contains the following effective pages:

------------------------------------------------------------------------
                                       Revision
                                        level
                Pages                  shown on     Date shown on page
                                         page
------------------------------------------------------------------------
List of Effective Pages:
  Pages 1-2.........................         15  Mar. 31, 2008.
------------------------------------------------------------------------

    (1) The Director of the Federal Register approved the
incorporation by reference of this service information under 5
U.S.C. 552(a) and 1 CFR part 51.
    (2) For service information identified in this AD, contact
Gulfstream Aerospace Corporation, P.O. Box 2206, Mail Station D-25,
Savannah, Georgia 31402-2206; telephone<PHONE_NUMBER>; fax 912-965-
3520; e-mail<EMAIL_ADDRESS>Internet http://
www.gulfstream.com/product_support/technical_pubs/pubs/index.htm.
    (3) You may review copies at the FAA, Transport Airplane
Directorate, 1601 Lind Avenue, SW., Renton, Washington; or at the
National Archives and Records Administration (NARA). For information
on the availability of this material at NARA, call<PHONE_NUMBER>,
or go to: http://www.archives.gov/federal_register/code_of_
federal_regulations/ibr_locations.html.

    Issued in Renton, Washington, on November 4, 2008.
Stephen P. Boyd,
Assistant Manager, Transport Airplane Directorate, Aircraft
Certification Service.
[FR Doc. E8-26922 Filed 11-19-08; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4910-13-P