   United States Environmental Protection Agency
   Office of Pollution
   Prevention and Toxics
   Washington, DC 20460
           August 2021

                 TOXICS RELEASE INVENTORY
                 Guidance for Reporting Parent Company Information to TRI

Section 313 of the Emergency Planning and Community Right-to-Know Act of 1986 (EPCRA) requires certain facilities manufacturing, processing, or otherwise using listed toxic chemicals to report the annual quantity of such chemicals entering each environmental medium. Such facilities must also report pollution prevention and recycling data for such chemicals, pursuant to section 6607 of the Pollution Prevention Act, 42 U.S.C. 13106. EPCRA section 313 is also known as the Toxics Release Inventory (TRI).

CONTENTS
SECTION 1.0 INTRODUCTION1
Section 1.1 Background on Proposed Rule1
Section 1.2 Purpose of Supporting Document2
SECTION 2.0 PROPOSED RULE: TRI PARENT COMPANY DEFINITION (Proposed CFR Text)2
SECTION 3.0 REPORTING EXAMPLES4
Section 3.1 Ownership by a Single, Standalone Entity5
Section 3.2 Ownership by a Single, Subsidiary Entity7
Section 3.3 Direct Ownership by Multiple Entities7
SECTION 4.0 REFERENCES10

LIST OF EXAMPLES

Example 1: Single Company Owning Single Facility5
Example 2: Single Company Owning Multiple Facilities5
Example 3: Ownership by a Single Foreign Company5
Example 4: Ownership by a Federal Government Agency or Department6
Example 5: Government-Owned, Contractor-Operated; Contractor Reporting6
Example 6: Government-Owned, Contractor-Operated; Federal Agency Reporting6
Example 7: Ownership by a State, Local, or Tribal Agency7
Example 8: Ownership by U.S. Division of U.S. Corporation7
Example 9: Ownership by U.S. Subsidiary of Foreign Corporation7
Example 10: Multi-company Ownership by U.S. Companies8
Example 11: Multi-company Ownership Including Foreign Entities8
Example 12: Multi-company Ownership Including Foreign Entities9
Example 13: Multi-company Ownership Including Foreign Entities9
Example 14: U.S. 50-50 Joint Venture Ownership10
Example 15: Foreign 50-50 Joint Venture Ownership10

INTRODUCTION
Background on Proposed Rule
EPA is proposing to codify a definition of parent company and further clarify reporting requirements for providing facility parent company information to the Toxics Release Inventory (TRI). TRI currently requires facilities to report their highest level United States-based parent company information annually in Part I, Section 5 of the annual reporting forms. However, no regulatory definition related to this important data field currently exists in 40 CFR part 372. Facilities currently rely on the following guidance in the TRI Reporting Forms and Instructions (US EPA, 2017) when determining the appropriate parent company to report:
      "Your parent company is the highest level company, located in the United States, and that directly owns at least 50 percent of the voting stock of [the facility's] company.... [A] facility that is a 50:50 joint venture is its own parent company. When a facility is owned by more than one company and none of the facility owners directly owns at least 50 percent of its voting stock, the facility should provide the name of the parent company of either the facility operator or the owner with the largest ownership interest in the facility."
Each year, EPA standardizes parent company names submitted to TRI. This process involves aligning submissions to a set of business rules (e.g., "Corporation" is changed to "Corp") to provide consistency in the TRI database. EPA also researches submitted names to ensure proper reporting by using online sources and other public datasets. After identifying suggested changes to the submitted parent company name, EPA contacts these facilities to confirm the appropriate name, per formatting guidelines and instructions. Each year through this process, EPA standardizes many of the forms received.
Through the parent company name standardization and subsequent correspondence with facilities, EPA has identified several causes for misreporting of parent company information to TRI including:
Facilities with several levels of ownership misinterpret the use of the word "directly" in the parent company reporting guidance to mean the company that directly owns the facility, which may be the subsidiary of a higher level company based in the United States.
Facilities whose highest-level parent company is based outside of the United States report a foreign company as the highest level company, often while not knowing the highest level U.S.-based parent company.
Facilities incorrectly report that no parent company exists.
In addition, there are several company ownership scenarios where current guidance does not explicitly address how to report the parent company:
Facilities with multiple owners and no owner with at least 50 percent of voting stock
Companies that own multiple facilities but have no higher level parent company
Facilities that are publicly-owned (e.g. federal facilities, municipal power plants)
The proposed rule would further define and clarify reporting requirements for facility parent company information. Under the proposed rule, the parent company definition would provide reporting clarity to facilities by identifying the appropriate parent company to report for a variety of facility ownership scenarios, and codifying this definition and instructions. The proposed rulemaking specifically would include:
Clarifying reporting requirements for the highest level U.S.-based parent company in the existing Part I, Section 5.1 and its Dun & Bradstreet Number in Part I, Section 5.2 by providing a regulatory definition, and
Soliciting public feedback on whether and how to incorporate foreign parent company data, including by adding new data elements similar to Part I, Sections 5.1 and 5.2 for reporting the name of a foreign company and its Dun & Bradstreet number.
Purpose of Supporting Document
The purpose of this document is to assist facilities in understanding the proposed reporting requirements for facility parent company information. The objectives of this document are to:
Provide explanation and assistance on EPCRA section 313 reporting requirements for parent company information
Promote consistency in the reporting of parent company information
Reduce the level of effort expended by those facilities that prepare TRI reports
Below, this document provides the proposed definition of parent company (Section 2.0) and provides several examples of how to report parent company information under various ownership scenarios (Section 3.0).

PROPOSED RULE: TRI PARENT COMPANY DEFINITION (Proposed CFR Text)
This section provides the proposed definition of parent company. For the full regulatory text of the proposed rule, please see the Notice of Proposed Rulemaking in Docket EPA-HQ-OPPT-2018-0155.
   Proposed Regulatory Text, 40 CFR 372:
   § 372.3 Definitions.
   * * * * *
   Parent company means the highest-level company(s) of the facility's ownership hierarchy as of December 31 of the year for which data are being reported according to the following instructions. The U.S. parent company is located within the United States while the foreign parent company is located outside the United States:
   (1) If the facility is entirely owned by a single U.S. company that is not owned by another company, that single company is the U.S. parent company.
   (2) If the facility is entirely owned by a single U.S. company that is, itself, owned by another U.S.-based company (e.g., it is a division or subsidiary of a higher-level company), the highest-level company in the ownership hierarchy is the U.S. parent company. If there is a higher-level parent company that is outside of the United States, the highest-level foreign company in the ownership hierarchy is the foreign parent company.
   (3) If the facility is owned by more than one company (e.g., company A owns 40 percent, company B owns 35 percent, and company C owns 25 percent), the highest-level U.S. company with the largest ownership interest in the facility is the U.S. parent company. If there is a higher-level foreign company in the ownership hierarchy, that company is the foreign parent company.
   (4) If the facility is owned by a 50:50 joint venture or a cooperative, the joint venture or cooperative is its own parent company.
   (5) If the facility is entirely owned by a foreign company (i.e., without a U.S.-based subsidiary within the facility's ownership hierarchy), the highest-level foreign parent company is the facility's foreign parent company.
    (6) If the facility is federally owned, the highest-level federal agency or department operating the facility is the U.S. parent company.
   (7) If the facility is owned by a non-federal public entity (e.g., a State, municipal, or tribal government), that entity is the U.S. parent company.
   * * * * *
   § 372.85   Toxic chemical release reporting form and instructions.
   * * * * *
   (b) Form elements. Information elements reportable on EPA Form R and Form R Schedule 1 include the following:
   * * * * *
   (8) Legal name of the facility's U.S.-based parent company and its Dun and Bradstreet identification number.
   (i) Legal name of the facility's highest-level foreign parent company and its Dun and Bradstreet identification number, when applicable.
   (ii) The facility must report using the standardized conventions for the naming of a parent company as provided in the toxic chemical release inventory reporting instructions identified in paragraph (a) of this section.
   * * * * *
   § 372.95   Alternate threshold certification and instructions.
   * * * * *
   (b) Alternate threshold certification statement elements. The following information must be reported on an alternate threshold certification statement pursuant to §372.27(b):
   * * * * *
   (12) Legal name of the facility's U.S.-based parent company and its Dun and Bradstreet identification number.
   (i) Legal name of the facility's highest-level foreign parent company and its Dun and Bradstreet identification number, when applicable.
   (ii) The facility must report using the standardized conventions for the naming of a parent company as provided in the toxic chemical release inventory reporting instructions identified in paragraph (a) of this section.
REPORTING EXAMPLES
In order to demonstrate how facilities would report parent companies under the proposed rule, several example ownership scenarios are described below and accompanied by a description of the appropriate reporting of U.S. parent company and foreign parent company for each scenario. These examples are not intended to be a comprehensive description of all possible ownership scenarios, but rather provide some assistance to help facilities in their determination of the appropriate parent company(s) to report.
Table 3 - 1: Summary of Ownership Scenarios
Ownership Scenario
US Parent
Foreign Parent
Corresponding Sub-part in Proposed Parent Company Definition
(40 CFR 372.3)
Relevant Example(s)
US Parent Whole Ownership
X

1, 2
1, 2, 8
Foreign Parent, No US Ownership

X
5
3, 15
US Federal Ownership
F

6
4
US Federal Government Owned, Contractor Operated (GOCO)
X

1, 2
5, 6
US State Local Tribe Owned
SLT

7
7
US Parent, Foreign Ultimate Ownership
X
X
2
9
US Parents, Split Ownership
XX

3
10
US and Foreign Parents, Split Ownership
XX
XX
3
11, 12, 13
50/50 US Parent Joint Venture
X

4
14
50/50 Foreign Parent Joint Venture

X
4
15
Note: X = single company/corporation; XX = multiple companies/corporations; F = federal government agency; SLT = other public legal entity (e.g., state, local, or tribe)

In the sections below, examples are provided for facility ownership by single standalone entities (Section 3.1); by single entities that are themselves owned by other entities (Section 3.2); and by multiple entities (Section 3.3). For each example, a scenario is described, the corresponding sub-part in the proposed parent company definition is indicated, and the reported data are provided for the following three reporting form data elements:
Part I, Section 4.1: Facility or Establishment Name (Facility)
Part I, Section 5.1: Name of U.S. Parent Company (U.S. Parent)
Part I, Section 5.3: Name of Foreign Parent Company (Foreign Parent)
In cases where there is no actual U.S. or foreign parent, the respondent will indicate not applicable (NA). In addition to the U.S. or foreign parent names, the facility must also report the corresponding Dun and Bradstreet number if applicable (not shown in the examples). Federally owned facilities and government owned, contractor operated (GOCO) facilities will also need to indicate their status through Part I, Section 4.2c (A Federal Facility) or Part I, Section 4.2d (GOCO).
Ownership by a Single, Standalone Entity
This section describes how to report parent company information for facilities that are owned by a single entity that is not owned by another entity. This includes scenarios in which the facility's single owner is a U.S. company (Example 1 and Example 2), a foreign company (Example 3), a federal government agency (Example 4, Example 5, and Example 6), or a state, local, or tribal entity (Example 7).
All facilities are expected to report on ownership. Nearly all facilities will report a U.S. parent unless a facility has entirely foreign ownership (e.g., Example 3).

Example 1: Single Company Owning Single Facility
A facility is 100% owned directly by a U.S.-based company (Company X), which is not a subsidiary of any other entity.
Corresponding Subpart in Proposed Parent Company Definition: 1
Demonstration of appropriate reporting:
           Facility: Facility Name
           U.S. Parent: Company X
           Foreign Parent: NA
Example 1: Single Company Owning Single Facility
A facility is 100% owned directly by a U.S.-based company (Company X), which is not a subsidiary of any other entity.
Corresponding Subpart in Proposed Parent Company Definition: 1
Demonstration of appropriate reporting:
           Facility: Facility Name
           U.S. Parent: Company X
           Foreign Parent: NA

Example 2: Single Company Owning Multiple Facilities
Several facilities (Facility A, Facility B, and Facility C) are 100% owned directly by a large U.S.-based company (Company X), which is not a subsidiary of any other entity.
Corresponding Subpart in Proposed Parent Company Definition: 1
Demonstration of appropriate reporting:
    Facility: Facility A Name
    U.S. Parent: Company X
    Foreign Parent: NA
    Facility: Facility B Name
    U.S. Parent: Company X
    Foreign Parent: NA
    Facility: Facility C Name
    U.S. Parent: Company X
    Foreign Parent: NA

Example 2: Single Company Owning Multiple Facilities
Several facilities (Facility A, Facility B, and Facility C) are 100% owned directly by a large U.S.-based company (Company X), which is not a subsidiary of any other entity.
Corresponding Subpart in Proposed Parent Company Definition: 1
Demonstration of appropriate reporting:
    Facility: Facility A Name
    U.S. Parent: Company X
    Foreign Parent: NA
    Facility: Facility B Name
    U.S. Parent: Company X
    Foreign Parent: NA
    Facility: Facility C Name
    U.S. Parent: Company X
    Foreign Parent: NA

Example 3: Ownership by a Single Foreign Company
A facility is directly owned by a foreign company (Company X), without any of the foreign company's U.S.-based subsidiaries within the ownership hierarchy of the facility. The foreign company is neither owned by nor a subsidiary of another entity.
Corresponding Subpart in Proposed Parent Company Definition: 5
Demonstration of appropriate reporting:
           Facility: Facility Name
           U.S. Parent: NA
           Foreign Parent: Company X
Example 3: Ownership by a Single Foreign Company
A facility is directly owned by a foreign company (Company X), without any of the foreign company's U.S.-based subsidiaries within the ownership hierarchy of the facility. The foreign company is neither owned by nor a subsidiary of another entity.
Corresponding Subpart in Proposed Parent Company Definition: 5
Demonstration of appropriate reporting:
           Facility: Facility Name
           U.S. Parent: NA
           Foreign Parent: Company X
Example 4: Ownership by a Federal Government Agency or Department
A facility is owned and directly operated by a federal government agency/department.
Corresponding Subpart in Proposed Parent Company Definition: 6; also see Appendix A of TRI Reporting Forms and Instructions. Per Appendix A, federal facilities should report their facility name as the federal agency or department acronym and the facility name, prefaced by "US". Federal facilities should report their parent company name by reporting their complete Department or Agency name, prefaced by "US". The facility would also indicate "Federal Facility" in Part I, Section 4.2.
Demonstration of appropriate reporting:
           Facility: US Federal Agency/Department Acronym Facility Name
           U.S. Parent: US Agency or Department Name
           Foreign Parent: NA
           Part I, Section 4.2c: A Federal Facility
Example 4: Ownership by a Federal Government Agency or Department
A facility is owned and directly operated by a federal government agency/department.
Corresponding Subpart in Proposed Parent Company Definition: 6; also see Appendix A of TRI Reporting Forms and Instructions. Per Appendix A, federal facilities should report their facility name as the federal agency or department acronym and the facility name, prefaced by "US". Federal facilities should report their parent company name by reporting their complete Department or Agency name, prefaced by "US". The facility would also indicate "Federal Facility" in Part I, Section 4.2.
Demonstration of appropriate reporting:
           Facility: US Federal Agency/Department Acronym Facility Name
           U.S. Parent: US Agency or Department Name
           Foreign Parent: NA
           Part I, Section 4.2c: A Federal Facility
Example 5: Government-Owned, Contractor-Operated; Contractor Reporting
A facility is owned by a federal government agency. A contractor (Company X) operates at this government facility and is required to file TRI reports independently of the federal facility. This contractor operating at the government facility is not a subsidiary of any other entity. Note that the federal facility, pursuant to executive order, will also need to file TRI reports. See Example 6 for how to populate the facility and parent company names for the federal entity's TRI reporting.
Corresponding Subpart in Proposed Parent Company Definition: 1; also see Appendix A of TRI Reporting Forms and Instructions. Per Appendix A, federal contractors at government owned, contractor operated (GOCO) facilities should report the contractor name (not a federal department or agency name) as the parent company. The facility name should first list the agency name, followed by the specific plant or site name.
Demonstration of appropriate reporting:
           Facility: US Federal Agency/Department Acronym Facility Name
           U.S. Parent: Company X
           Foreign Parent: NA
           Part I, Section 4.2d: Government Owned, Contractor Operated (GOCO)
Example 5: Government-Owned, Contractor-Operated; Contractor Reporting
A facility is owned by a federal government agency. A contractor (Company X) operates at this government facility and is required to file TRI reports independently of the federal facility. This contractor operating at the government facility is not a subsidiary of any other entity. Note that the federal facility, pursuant to executive order, will also need to file TRI reports. See Example 6 for how to populate the facility and parent company names for the federal entity's TRI reporting.
Corresponding Subpart in Proposed Parent Company Definition: 1; also see Appendix A of TRI Reporting Forms and Instructions. Per Appendix A, federal contractors at government owned, contractor operated (GOCO) facilities should report the contractor name (not a federal department or agency name) as the parent company. The facility name should first list the agency name, followed by the specific plant or site name.
Demonstration of appropriate reporting:
           Facility: US Federal Agency/Department Acronym Facility Name
           U.S. Parent: Company X
           Foreign Parent: NA
           Part I, Section 4.2d: Government Owned, Contractor Operated (GOCO)
Example 6: Government-Owned, Contractor-Operated; Federal Agency Reporting
A facility is owned by a federal government agency and is submitting TRI reports. Note that there may be contractors at this facility that are required to file TRI reports independently of the federal facility. See Example 5 for how to populate the facility and parent company names for the contractor's TRI reporting.
Corresponding Subpart in Proposed Parent Company Definition: 1; also see Appendix A of TRI Reporting Forms and Instructions. Per Appendix A, federal contractors at government owned, contractor operated (GOCO) facilities should report the contractor name (not a federal department or agency name) as the parent company. The facility name should first list the agency name, followed by the specific plant or site name.
Demonstration of appropriate reporting:
           Facility: US Federal Agency/Department Acronym Facility Name
           U.S. Parent: Company X
           Foreign Parent: NA
           Part I, Section 4.2c: A Federal Facility
Example 6: Government-Owned, Contractor-Operated; Federal Agency Reporting
A facility is owned by a federal government agency and is submitting TRI reports. Note that there may be contractors at this facility that are required to file TRI reports independently of the federal facility. See Example 5 for how to populate the facility and parent company names for the contractor's TRI reporting.
Corresponding Subpart in Proposed Parent Company Definition: 1; also see Appendix A of TRI Reporting Forms and Instructions. Per Appendix A, federal contractors at government owned, contractor operated (GOCO) facilities should report the contractor name (not a federal department or agency name) as the parent company. The facility name should first list the agency name, followed by the specific plant or site name.
Demonstration of appropriate reporting:
           Facility: US Federal Agency/Department Acronym Facility Name
           U.S. Parent: Company X
           Foreign Parent: NA
           Part I, Section 4.2c: A Federal Facility
Example 7: Ownership by a State, Local, or Tribal Agency
A facility is owned and operated by a State, Local, or Tribal agency.
Corresponding Subpart in Proposed Parent Company Definition: 7
Demonstration of appropriate reporting:
           Facility Name: Facility Name
           U.S. Parent: State, Local, or Tribal Agency
           Foreign Parent: NA
Example 7: Ownership by a State, Local, or Tribal Agency
A facility is owned and operated by a State, Local, or Tribal agency.
Corresponding Subpart in Proposed Parent Company Definition: 7
Demonstration of appropriate reporting:
           Facility Name: Facility Name
           U.S. Parent: State, Local, or Tribal Agency
           Foreign Parent: NA
Ownership by a Single, Subsidiary Entity
This section describes how to report parent company information for facilities that are owned by a single entity, which are in turn owned by another entity, and may have more complicated ownership structures. Below, examples are provided, including scenarios in which the single owner is a U.S. company owned by another U.S. corporation (Example 8), or the single owner is a U.S. company owned by a foreign corporation (Example 9).
Example 8: Ownership by U.S. Division of U.S. Corporation
A facility is 100% owned directly by a company (Company X) within the U.S., which is a division of a larger U.S. company (Company Y).
Corresponding Subpart in Proposed Parent Company Definition: 2
Demonstration of appropriate reporting:
           Facility: Facility Name
           U.S. Parent: Company Y
           Foreign Parent: NA
Example 8: Ownership by U.S. Division of U.S. Corporation
A facility is 100% owned directly by a company (Company X) within the U.S., which is a division of a larger U.S. company (Company Y).
Corresponding Subpart in Proposed Parent Company Definition: 2
Demonstration of appropriate reporting:
           Facility: Facility Name
           U.S. Parent: Company Y
           Foreign Parent: NA

Example 9: Ownership by U.S. Subsidiary of Foreign Corporation
A facility is 100% owned directly by a company (Company X) within the U.S., which is a division of a larger U.S. company (Company Y). This larger U.S.-based company is a subsidiary of a large foreign corporation (Corporation Z).
Corresponding Subpart in Proposed Parent Company Definition: 2
Demonstration of appropriate reporting:
           Facility: Facility Name
           U.S. Parent: Company Y
           Foreign Parent: Corporation Z
Example 9: Ownership by U.S. Subsidiary of Foreign Corporation
A facility is 100% owned directly by a company (Company X) within the U.S., which is a division of a larger U.S. company (Company Y). This larger U.S.-based company is a subsidiary of a large foreign corporation (Corporation Z).
Corresponding Subpart in Proposed Parent Company Definition: 2
Demonstration of appropriate reporting:
           Facility: Facility Name
           U.S. Parent: Company Y
           Foreign Parent: Corporation Z
Direct Ownership by Multiple Entities
This section describes how to report parent company information for facilities that are directly owned by multiple entities, which in turn can have multilevel ownership structures including both U.S. and foreign entities. Schematic illustrations of multilevel ownership structures are also included.
Example 10: Multi-company Ownership by U.S. Companies
A facility is partially owned by three U.S.-based companies: Company A owns 40%, Company B owns 35%, and Company C owns 25%. Company A is a subsidiary of a large U.S.-based corporation, Corporation D. None of the companies are owned by a foreign company.
Corresponding Subpart in Proposed Parent Company Definition: 3
Demonstration of appropriate reporting:
           Facility: Facility Name
           U.S. Parent: Corporation D
           Foreign Parent: NA

Example 10: Multi-company Ownership by U.S. Companies
A facility is partially owned by three U.S.-based companies: Company A owns 40%, Company B owns 35%, and Company C owns 25%. Company A is a subsidiary of a large U.S.-based corporation, Corporation D. None of the companies are owned by a foreign company.
Corresponding Subpart in Proposed Parent Company Definition: 3
Demonstration of appropriate reporting:
           Facility: Facility Name
           U.S. Parent: Corporation D
           Foreign Parent: NA

Example 11: Multi-company Ownership Including Foreign Entities
A facility is partially owned by two companies: Company A owns 60%, and Company B owns 40%.  Both Company A and Company B are based in the U.S. Company B is a 100% subsidiary of a foreign company, Corporation D.
Corresponding Subpart in Proposed Parent Company Definition: 3
Demonstration of appropriate reporting:
           Facility: Facility Name
           U.S. Parent: Company A
           Foreign Parent: Corporation D

Example 11: Multi-company Ownership Including Foreign Entities
A facility is partially owned by two companies: Company A owns 60%, and Company B owns 40%.  Both Company A and Company B are based in the U.S. Company B is a 100% subsidiary of a foreign company, Corporation D.
Corresponding Subpart in Proposed Parent Company Definition: 3
Demonstration of appropriate reporting:
           Facility: Facility Name
           U.S. Parent: Company A
           Foreign Parent: Corporation D

Example 12: Multi-company Ownership Including Foreign Entities
A facility is partially owned by three companies: Company A owns 40%, Company B owns 35%, and Company C owns 25%. Company A is a foreign corporation, and Companies B and C are based in the U.S. Company B is a 100% subsidiary of a foreign company, Corporation D. Companies A and C are not owned by any other entity.
Corresponding Subpart in Proposed Parent Company Definition: 3
Demonstration of appropriate reporting:
           Facility: Facility Name
           U.S. Parent: Company B
           Foreign Parent: Company A
Note that Company A holds the largest percentage share of ownership in the facility itself and is a foreign company, thus it should be reported as the foreign parent. Company B has the largest percentage of U.S.-based ownership, and thus should be reported as the U.S. parent.

Example 12: Multi-company Ownership Including Foreign Entities
A facility is partially owned by three companies: Company A owns 40%, Company B owns 35%, and Company C owns 25%. Company A is a foreign corporation, and Companies B and C are based in the U.S. Company B is a 100% subsidiary of a foreign company, Corporation D. Companies A and C are not owned by any other entity.
Corresponding Subpart in Proposed Parent Company Definition: 3
Demonstration of appropriate reporting:
           Facility: Facility Name
           U.S. Parent: Company B
           Foreign Parent: Company A
Note that Company A holds the largest percentage share of ownership in the facility itself and is a foreign company, thus it should be reported as the foreign parent. Company B has the largest percentage of U.S.-based ownership, and thus should be reported as the U.S. parent.

Example 13: Multi-company Ownership Including Foreign Entities
A facility is partially owned by three companies: Company A owns 40%, Company B owns 35%, and Company C owns 25%. Company A is a U.S.-based company, which is a 100% subsidiary of a foreign company, Corporation D. Companies B and C are both foreign companies, neither of which are owned by any other entity.
Corresponding Subpart in Proposed Parent Company Definition: 3
Demonstration of appropriate reporting:
           Facility: Facility Name
           U.S. Parent: Company A
           Foreign Parent: Corporation D
Note that Corporation D, through its ownership of Company A, holds the largest percentage share of foreign ownership in the facility. Corporation D should be reported as the foreign parent.

Example 13: Multi-company Ownership Including Foreign Entities
A facility is partially owned by three companies: Company A owns 40%, Company B owns 35%, and Company C owns 25%. Company A is a U.S.-based company, which is a 100% subsidiary of a foreign company, Corporation D. Companies B and C are both foreign companies, neither of which are owned by any other entity.
Corresponding Subpart in Proposed Parent Company Definition: 3
Demonstration of appropriate reporting:
           Facility: Facility Name
           U.S. Parent: Company A
           Foreign Parent: Corporation D
Note that Corporation D, through its ownership of Company A, holds the largest percentage share of foreign ownership in the facility. Corporation D should be reported as the foreign parent.

Example 14: U.S. 50-50 Joint Venture Ownership
A facility is owned by a joint venture between two companies, Company A and Company B, both of which own exactly half of the facility. This joint venture is based in the U.S.
Corresponding Subpart in Proposed Parent Company Definition: 4
Demonstration of appropriate reporting:
           Facility: Facility Name
           U.S. Parent: Name of joint venture
           Foreign Parent: NA
Example 14: U.S. 50-50 Joint Venture Ownership
A facility is owned by a joint venture between two companies, Company A and Company B, both of which own exactly half of the facility. This joint venture is based in the U.S.
Corresponding Subpart in Proposed Parent Company Definition: 4
Demonstration of appropriate reporting:
           Facility: Facility Name
           U.S. Parent: Name of joint venture
           Foreign Parent: NA

Example 15: Foreign 50-50 Joint Venture Ownership
A facility is owned by a joint venture between two companies from different countries, Company A and Company B, both of which own exactly half of the facility. The resulting joint venture is considered to be based outside the U.S.
Corresponding Subpart in Proposed Parent Company Definition: 4
Demonstration of appropriate reporting:
           Facility: Facility Name
           U.S. Parent Company: NA
           Foreign Parent Company: Name of foreign-based joint venture
Example 15: Foreign 50-50 Joint Venture Ownership
A facility is owned by a joint venture between two companies from different countries, Company A and Company B, both of which own exactly half of the facility. The resulting joint venture is considered to be based outside the U.S.
Corresponding Subpart in Proposed Parent Company Definition: 4
Demonstration of appropriate reporting:
           Facility: Facility Name
           U.S. Parent Company: NA
           Foreign Parent Company: Name of foreign-based joint venture

REFERENCES
US EPA (2020). Toxic Chemical Release Inventory Reporting Forms and Instructions: Revised 2020 Version. Available: www.epa.gov/tri/rfi [Accessed July 2021].


[Federal Register: May 25, 2007 (Volume 72, Number 101)]
[Notices]
[Page 29319-29320]
[DOCID:fr25my07-48]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY

[EPA-HQ-OPPT-2007-1019; FRL-8119-9]

Approval of Test Marketing Exemption for a Certain New
Microorganism

AGENCY: Environmental Protection Agency (EPA).

ACTION: Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: This notice announces EPA's approval of an application for
test marketing exemption (TME) under section 5(h)(1) of the Toxic
Substances Control Act (TSCA) and 40 CFR part 725, subpart F. EPA has
designated this application as TME-06-09. The test marketing conditions
are described in the TME application and in this notice.

DATES: Approval of this TME became effective December 21, 2006.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: For general information contact: Colby
Lintner, Regulatory Coordinator, Environmental Assistance Division
(7408M), Office of Pollution Prevention and Toxics, Environmental
Protection Agency, 1200 Pennsylvania Ave., NW., Washington, DC 20460-
0001; telephone number:<PHONE_NUMBER>; e-mail address:
<EMAIL_ADDRESS>
    For technical information contact: Audrey Binder, Chemical Control
Division (7405M), Office of Pollution Prevention and Toxics,
Environmental Protection Agency, 1200 Pennsylvania Ave., NW.,
Washington, DC 20460-0001; telephone number:<PHONE_NUMBER>; e-mail
address<EMAIL_ADDRESS>
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

I. General Information

A. Does this Action Apply to Me?

    This action is directed in particular to the microorganism
manufacturer who submitted the TME to EPA. This action may, however, be
of interest to the public in general. Since other entities may also be
interested, the Agency has not attempted to describe all the specific
entities that may be affected by this action. If you have any questions
regarding the applicability of this action to a particular entity,
consult the technical person listed under FOR FURTHER INFORMATION
CONTACT.

B. How Can I get Copies of this Document and Other Related Information?

    1. Docket. EPA has established a docket for this action under
docket ID number EPA-HQ-OPPT-2007-1019. All documents in the docket are
listed in the docket's index at http://www.regulations.gov. Although

listed in the index, some information is not publicly available, e.g.,
Confidential Business Information (CBI) or other information whose
disclosure is restricted by statute. Certain other material, such as
copyrighted material, will be publicly available only in hard copy.
Publicly available docket materials are available electronically at
http://www.regulations.gov, or, if only available in hard copy, at the

OPPT Docket. The OPPT Docket is located in the EPA Docket Center (EPA/
DC) at Rm. 3334, EPA West Bldg., 1301 Constitution Ave., NW.,
Washington, DC. The EPA/DC Public Reading Room hours of operation are
8:30 a.m. to 4:30 p.m., Monday through Friday, excluding Federal
holidays. The telephone number of the EPA/DC Public Reading Room is
(202) 566-1744, and the telephone number for the OPPT Docket is (202)
566-0280. Docket visitors are required to show photographic
identification, pass through a metal detector, and sign the EPA visitor
log. All visitor bags are processed through an X-ray machine and
subject to search. Visitors will be provided an EPA/DC badge that must
be visible at all times in the building and returned upon departure.
    2. Electronic access. You may access this Federal Register document
electronically through the EPA Internet under the ``Federal Register''
listings at http://www.epa.gov/fedrgstr.

II. What is the Agency's Authority for Taking this Action?

    Section 5(h)(1) of TSCA and 40 CFR part 725, subpart F authorizes
EPA to exempt persons from Microbial Commercial Activity Notification
(MCAN) requirements and permit them to manufacture or import new
microorganisms for test marketing purposes, if the Agency finds that
the manufacture, processing, distribution in commerce, use, and
disposal of the microorganisms for test marketing purposes will not
present an unreasonable risk of injury to health or the environment.
EPA may impose restrictions on test marketing activities and may modify
or revoke a test marketing exemption upon receipt of new information
which casts significant doubt on its finding that the test marketing
activity will not present an unreasonable risk of injury.

III. What Action is the Agency Taking?

    EPA has approved the above-referenced TME. EPA has determined that
test marketing the new microorganism, under the conditions set out in
the TME application and in this notice, will not present any
unreasonable risk of injury to health or the environment.

IV. What Restrictions Apply to this TME?

    The test market time period, production volume, and use must not
exceed specifications in the application and this notice. All other
conditions and restrictions described in the application and in this
notice must also be met. Impacts to the environment must also be
managed as described in the TME as amended.

    TME-06-09.
    Date of Receipt: September 14, 2006.
    Notice of Receipt: October 13, 2006 (71 FR 60517) (FRL-8099-3).
    Applicant: Confidential.
    Microorganism: Organic acid producing organism.
    Use: Industrial manufacture of an organic acid.
    Production Volume: Confidential.
    Number of Customers: Confidential.
    Test Marketing Period: Duration as specified in TME application,
commencing on first day of commercial manufacture.
    The following additional restrictions apply to this TME. A bill of
lading accompanying each shipment must state that the use of the
microorganism is restricted to that approved in the TME. In addition,
the applicant shall maintain the following records until 5 years after
the date they are created, and shall make them available for inspection
or copying in accordance with section 11 of TSCA:
    1. Records of the quantity of the TME microorganism produced and
the date of manufacture.
    2. Records of dates of the shipments to each customer and the
quantities supplied in each shipment.
    3. Copies of the bill of lading that accompanies each shipment of
the TME microorganism.

V. What was EPA's Risk Assessment for this TME?

    Under the conditions required for this TME, EPA identified no
significant health or environmental concerns for

the test market microorganism. Therefore, the test market activities
will not present any unreasonable risk of injury to human health or the
environment.

VI. Can EPA Change Its Decision on this TME in the Future?

    Yes. The Agency reserves the right to rescind approval or modify
the conditions and restrictions of an exemption should any new
information that comes to its attention cast significant doubt on its
finding that the test marketing activities will not present any
unreasonable risk of injury to human health or the environment.

List of Subjects

    Environmental protection, Test marketing exemptions.

    Dated: March 15, 2007.
Rebecca S. Cool,
Chief, New Chemicals Notice Management Branch, Office of Pollution
Prevention and Toxics.
[FR Doc. E7-10067 Filed 5-24-07; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 6560-50-S


[Federal Register Volume 84, Number 83 (Tuesday, April 30, 2019)]
[Notices]
[Pages 18276-18277]
[FR Doc No: 2019-08680]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission

Combined Notice of Filings

    Take notice that the Commission has received the following Natural
Gas Pipeline Rate and Refund Report filings:

Filings Instituting Proceedings

    Docket Numbers: RP19-1063-001.
    Applicants: Gulf South Pipeline Company, LP.
    Description: Tariff Amendment: Amendment to Filing in Docket No.
RP19-1063-000 to be effective 4/1/2019.
    Filed Date: 4/22/19.
    Accession Number: 20190422-5055.
    Comments Due: 5 p.m. ET 5/6/19.

    Docket Numbers: RP19-1065-001.
    Applicants: Gulf South Pipeline Company, LP.
    Description: Tariff Amendment: Amendment to Docket No. RP19-1065-
000 to be effective 4/1/2019.
    Filed Date: 4/22/19.
    Accession Number: 20190422-5056.
    Comments Due: 5 p.m. ET 5/6/19.

    Docket Numbers: RP19-1144-000.
    Applicants: Tallgrass Interstate Gas Transmission, LLC.
    Description: Compliance filing NAESB 3.1 Compliance Filing to be
effective 8/1/2019.
    Filed Date: 4/23/19.
    Accession Number: 20190423-5150.
    Comments Due: 5 p.m. ET 5/6/19.

    Docket Numbers: RP19-1145-000.
    Applicants: El Paso Natural Gas Company, L.L.C.
    Description: Sec.  4(d) Rate Filing: Negotiated Rate Agreement
Update (GIGO) to be effective 5/1/2019.
    Filed Date: 4/23/19.
    Accession Number: 20190423-5152.
    Comments Due: 5 p.m. ET 5/6/19.

    Docket Numbers: RP19-1146-000.
    Applicants: Trailblazer Pipeline Company LLC.
    Description: Compliance filing NAESB 3.1 Compliance Filing to be
effective 8/1/2019.
    Filed Date: 4/23/19.
    Accession Number: 20190423-5154.
    Comments Due: 5 p.m. ET 5/6/19.

    The filings are accessible in the Commission's eLibrary system by
clicking on the links or querying the docket number.
    Any person desiring to intervene or protest in any of the above
proceedings must file in accordance with Rules 211 and 214 of the
Commission's Regulations (18 CFR 385.211 and 385.214) on or before 5:00
p.m. Eastern time on the specified comment date. Protests may be
considered, but intervention is necessary to become a party to the
proceeding.
    eFiling is encouraged. More detailed information relating to filing
requirements, interventions, protests, service, and qualifying
facilities filings can be found at: http://www.ferc.gov/docs-filing/efiling/filing-req.pdf. For other information, call<PHONE_NUMBER>
(toll free). For TTY, call<PHONE_NUMBER>.

    Dated: April 24, 2019.
Nathaniel J. Davis, Sr.,
Deputy Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2019-08680 Filed 4-29-19; 8:45 am]
 BILLING CODE 6717-01-P