[Federal Register: October 6, 2010 (Volume 75, Number 193)]
[Notices]
[Page 61718-61721]
[DOCID:fr06oc10-60]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission

Combined Notice of Filings 1

September 24, 2010.
    Take notice that the Commission received the following exempt
wholesale generator filings:

    Docket Numbers: EG10-70-000.
    Applicants: Criterion Power Partners, LLC.
    Description: Self-Certification of Exempt Wholesale Generator
status of Criterion Power Partners, LLC.
    Filed Date: 09/23/2010.
    Accession Number: 20100923-5116.
    Comment Date: 5 p.m. Eastern Time on Thursday, October 14, 2010.

    Take notice that the Commission received the following electric
rate filings:

    Docket Numbers: ER03-9-020; ER98-2157-021.
    Applicants: Westar Energy, Inc.; Kansas Gas and Electric Company.
    Description: Notice of Change in Status of Westar Energy, Inc.
    Filed Date: 09/23/2010.

    Accession Number: 20100923-5172.
    Comment Date: 5 p.m. Eastern Time on Thursday, October 14, 2010.

    Docket Numbers: ER10-2029-002.
    Applicants: Calpine Mid-Atlantic Marketing, LLC.
    Description: Calpine Mid-Atlantic Marketing, LLC submits Supplement
to Market Based Rate Application, to be effective 9/27/2010.
    Filed Date: 09/24/2010.
    Accession Number: 20100924-5002.
    Comment Date: 5 p.m. Eastern Time on Friday, October 15, 2010.

    Docket Numbers: ER10-2198-001.
    Applicants: Lakefield Wind Project, LLC.
    Description: Lakefield Wind Project, LLC submits tariff filing per
35.17(b): Lakefield Wind Project Supplement to Application for MBR
Authorization to be effective 10/10/2010.
    Filed Date: 09/24/2010.
    Accession Number: 20100924-5039.
    Comment Date: 5 p.m. Eastern Time on Friday, October 15, 2010.

    Docket Numbers: ER10-2281-001.
    Applicants: Constellation Mystic Power, LLC.
    Description: Constellation Mystic Power, LLC submits amendment to
its Application for Order Authorizing Market-Based Rates, and Request
for Certain Waivers and Blanket Authorizations, etc.
    Filed Date: 09/23/2010.
    Accession Number: 20100923-0206.
    Comment Date: 5 p.m. Eastern Time on Thursday, October 14, 2010.

    Docket Numbers: ER10-2086-001; ER10-2513-001; ER10-2515-001; ER10-
2516-001; ER10-2514-001.
    Applicants: Alta Wind I, LLC, Alta Wind II, LLC, Alta Wind III,
LLC, Alta Wind IV, LLC, Alta Wind V, LLC.
    Description: Seller submits supplement filing to its market-based
rate petitions.
    Filed Date: 09/23/2010.
    Accession Number: 20100923-0212.
    Comment Date: 5 p.m. Eastern Time on Thursday, October 07, 2010.

    Docket Numbers: ER10-2887-000.
    Applicants: New Hampshire Industries, Inc.
    Description: New Hampshire Industries, Inc. submits application for
authorization to make wholesale sales of energy and capacity at
negotiated, market-based rates.
    Filed Date: 09/22/2010.
    Accession Number: 20100923-0215.
    Comment Date: 5 p.m. Eastern Time on Wednesday, October 13, 2010.

    Docket Numbers: ER10-2889-000.
    Applicants: Luminescent Systems, Inc.
    Description: Luminescent Systems, Inc submits application for
authorization to make wholesale sales of energy and capacity at
negotiated, market-based rates.
    Filed Date: 09/22/2010.
    Accession Number: 20100923-0214.
    Comment Date: 5 p.m. Eastern Time on Wednesday, October 13, 2010.

    Docket Numbers: ER10-2890-000.
    Applicants: Hammond Belgrade Energy, LLC.
    Description: Hammond Belgrade Energy, LLC submits application for
authorization to make wholesale sales of energy and capacity at
negotiated market-based rates.
    Filed Date: 09/23/2010.
    Accession Number: 20100923-0213.
    Comment Date: 5 p.m. Eastern Time on Thursday, October 14, 2010.

    Docket Numbers: ER10-2891-000.
    Applicants: Elektrisola, Inc.
    Description: Elektrisola, Inc. submits application for
authorization to make wholesale sales of energy and capacity at
negotiated market-based rates.
    Filed Date: 09/23/2010.
    Accession Number: 20100923-0211.
    Comment Date: 5 p.m. Eastern Time on Thursday, October 14, 2010.

    Docket Numbers: ER10-2892-000.
    Applicants: Lavalley Energy LLC.
    Description: Lavalley Energy LLC submits application for
authorization to make wholesale sales of energy and capacity at
negotiated market-based rates.
    Filed Date: 09/23/2010.
    Accession Number: 20100923-0208.
    Comment Date: 5 p.m. Eastern Time on Thursday, October 14, 2010.

    Docket Numbers: ER10-2893-000.
    Applicants: SJH Energy, LLC.
    Description: SJH Energy, LLC submits an application for
authorization to make wholesale sales of energy and capacity at
negotiated, market-based rates.
    Filed Date: 09/22/2010.
    Accession Number: 20100923-0209.
    Comment Date: 5 p.m. Eastern Time on Wednesday, October 13, 2010.

    Docket Numbers: ER10-2894-000.
    Applicants: PalletOne Energy, LLC.
    Description: PalletOne Energy, LLC submits application for
authorization to make wholesale sales of energy and capacity at
negotiated market-based rates.
    Filed Date: 09/23/2010.
    Accession Number: 20100923-0210.
    Comment Date: 5 p.m. Eastern Time on Thursday, October 14, 2010.

    Docket Numbers: ER10-2904-000.
    Applicants: Rhode Island Eastern Massachusetts Vermont Energy
Control.
    Description: Rhode Island Eastern Massachusetts Vermont Energy
Control submits tariff filing per 35.12: Filing to Create Tariff
Identifier for REMVEC Rate Schedule to be effective 9/23/2010.
    Filed Date: 09/23/2010.
    Accession Number: 20100923-5135.
    Comment Date: 5 p.m. Eastern Time on Thursday, October 14, 2010.

    Docket Numbers: ER10-2905-000.
    Applicants: Scotia Capital Energy Inc.
    Description: Scotia Capital Energy Inc. submits tariff filing per
35.12: Market-Based Rate to be effective 9/23/2010.
    Filed Date: 09/23/2010.
    Accession Number: 20100923-5142.
    Comment Date: 5 p.m. Eastern Time on Thursday, October 14, 2010.

    Docket Numbers: ER10-2906-000.
    Applicants: Morgan Stanley Capital Group Inc.
    Description: Morgan Stanley Capital Group Inc. submits tariff
filing per 35.12: Baseline to be effective 9/23/2010.
    Filed Date: 09/23/2010.
    Accession Number: 20100923-5144.
    Comment Date: 5 p.m. Eastern Time on Thursday, October 14, 2010.

    Docket Numbers: ER10-2907-000.
    Applicants: Indiana Michigan Power Company, Appalachian Power
Company, Ohio Power Company, Kingsport Power Company, Columbus Southern
Power Company, Kentucky Power Company, Wheeling Power Company.
    Description: Indiana Michigan Power Company submits tariff filing
per 35.12: 20100923--MBR AEP Op Co. to be effective 8/1/2016.
    Filed Date: 09/23/2010.
    Accession Number: 20100923-5147.
    Comment Date: 5 p.m. Eastern Time on Thursday, October 14, 2010.

    Docket Numbers: ER10-2908-000.
    Applicants: MS Solar Solutions Corp.
    Description: MS Solar Solutions Corp. submits tariff filing per
35.12: Baseline to be effective 9/23/2010.
    Filed Date: 09/23/2010.
    Accession Number: 20100923-5148.
    Comment Date: 5 p.m. Eastern Time on Thursday, October 14, 2010.

    Docket Numbers: ER10-2909-000.
    Applicants: Power Contract Financing II, Inc.
    Description: Power Contract Financing II, Inc. submits tariff
filing per 35.12: Baseline to be effective 9/23/2010.
    Filed Date: 09/23/2010.
    Accession Number: 20100923-5149.
    Comment Date: 5 p.m. Eastern Time on Thursday, October 14, 2010.

    Docket Numbers: ER10-2910-000.
    Applicants: Power Contract Financing II, LLC.
    Description: Power Contract Financing II, LLC submits tariff filing

per 35.12: Baseline to be effective 9/23/2010.
    Filed Date: 09/23/2010.
    Accession Number: 20100923-5150.
    Comment Date: 5 p.m. Eastern Time on Thursday, October 14, 2010.

    Docket Numbers: ER10-2911-000.
    Applicants: Naniwa Energy LLC.
    Description: Naniwa Energy LLC submits tariff filing per 35.12:
Baseline to be effective 9/23/2010.
    Filed Date: 09/23/2010.
    Accession Number: 20100923-5154.
    Comment Date: 5 p.m. Eastern Time on Thursday, October 14, 2010.

    Docket Numbers: ER10-2912-000.
    Applicants: Alliance For Cooperative Energy Services Power
Marketing LLC.
    Description: Alliance For Cooperative Energy Services Power
Marketing LLC submits tariff filing per 35.12: Baseline Tariff to be
effective 9/23/2010.
    Filed Date: 09/23/2010.
    Accession Number: 20100923-5157.
    Comment Date: 5 p.m. Eastern Time on Thursday, October 14, 2010.

    Docket Numbers: ER10-2913-000.
    Applicants: NRG Energy Center Paxton LLC.
    Description: NRG Energy Center Paxton LLC submits tariff filing per
35.12: NRG Energy Center Paxton FERC Electric Tariff to be effective 9/
23/2010.
    Filed Date: 09/23/2010.
    Accession Number: 20100923-5158.
    Comment Date: 5 p.m. Eastern Time on Thursday, October 14, 2010.

    Docket Numbers: ER10-2914-000.
    Applicants: NRG New Jersey Energy Sales LLC.
    Description: NRG New Jersey Energy Sales LLC submits tariff filing
per 35.12: NRG New Jersey Energy Sales FERC Electric Tariff to be
effective 9/24/2010.
    Filed Date: 09/24/2010.
    Accession Number: 20100924-5018.
    Comment Date: 5 p.m. Eastern Time on Friday, October 15, 2010.

    Docket Numbers: ER10-2915-000.
    Applicants: NRG Rockford II LLC.
    Description: NRG Rockford II LLC submits tariff filing per 35.12:
NRG Rockford II FERC Electric Tariff to be effective 9/24/2010.
    Filed Date: 09/24/2010.
    Accession Number: 20100924-5020.
    Comment Date: 5 p.m. Eastern Time on Friday, October 15, 2010.
    Docket Numbers: ER10-2916-000.
    Applicants: NRG Rockford LLC.
    Description: NRG Rockford LLC submits tariff filing per 35.12: NRG
Rockford FERC Electric Tariff to be effective 9/24/2010.
    Filed Date: 09/24/2010.
    Accession Number: 20100924-5021.
    Comment Date: 5 p.m. Eastern Time on Friday, October 15, 2010.

    Docket Numbers: ER10-2917-000.
    Applicants: Brookfield Power Piney & Deep Creek LLC.
    Description: Brookfield Power Piney & Deep Creek LLC submits tariff
filing per 35.12: Brookfield Power Piney & Deep Creek LLC Baseline
Market-Based Rate Tariff to be effective 9/24/2010.
    Filed Date: 09/24/2010.
    Accession Number: 20100924-5022.
    Comment Date: 5 p.m. Eastern Time on Friday, October 15, 2010.

    Docket Numbers: ER10-2918-000.
    Applicants: Carr Street Generating Station, L.P.
    Description: Carr Street Generating Station, L.P. submits tariff
filing per 35.12: Carr Street Generating Station, L.P. Baseline Market-
Based Rate Tariff to be effective 9/24/2010.
    Filed Date: 09/24/2010.
    Accession Number: 20100924-5024.
    Comment Date: 5 p.m. Eastern Time on Friday, October 15, 2010.

    Docket Numbers: ER10-2919-000.
    Applicants: Brookfield Renewable Energy Marketing US LLC.
    Description: Brookfield Renewable Energy Marketing US LLC submits
tariff filing per 35.12: Brookfield Renewable Energy Marketing US LLC
Baseline Market-Based Rate Tariff to be effective 9/24/2010.
    Filed Date: 09/24/2010.
    Accession Number: 20100924-5029.
    Comment Date: 5 p.m. Eastern Time on Friday, October 15, 2010.

    Docket Numbers: ER10-2920-000.
    Applicants: Erie Boulevard Hydropower, L.P.
    Description: Erie Boulevard Hydropower, L.P. submits tariff filing
per 35.12: Erie Boulevard Hydropower, L.P. Baseline Market-Based Rate
Tariff to be effective 9/24/2010.
    Filed Date: 09/24/2010.
    Accession Number: 20100924-5030.
    Comment Date: 5 p.m. Eastern Time on Friday, October 15, 2010.

    Docket Numbers: ER10-2921-000.
    Applicants: Great Lakes Hydro America, LLC.
    Description: Great Lakes Hydro America, LLC submits tariff filing
per 35.12: Great Lakes Hydro America, LLC Baseline Market-Based Rate
Tariff to be effective 9/24/2010.
    Filed Date: 09/24/2010.
    Accession Number: 20100924-5031.
    Comment Date: 5 p.m. Eastern Time on Friday, October 15, 2010.

    Docket Numbers: ER10-2922-000.
    Applicants: Hawks Nest Hydro LLC.
    Description: Hawks Nest Hydro LLC submits tariff filing per 35.12:
Hawks Nest Hydro LLC Baseline Market-Based Rate Tariff to be effective
9/24/2010.
    Filed Date: 09/24/2010.
    Accession Number: 20100924-5032.
    Comment Date: 5 p.m. Eastern Time on Friday, October 15, 2010.

    Docket Numbers: ER10-2923-000.
    Applicants: Sunbury Generation LP.
    Description: Sunbury Generation LP submits tariff filing per 35.12:
Sunbury Generation LP Baseline MBR and Reactive Power Tariffs to be
effective 9/24/2010.
    Filed Date: 09/24/2010.
    Accession Number: 20100924-5033.
    Comment Date: 5 p.m. Eastern Time on Friday, October 15, 2010.

    Any person desiring to intervene or to protest in any of the above
proceedings must file in accordance with Rules 211 and 214 of the
Commission's Rules of Practice and Procedure (18 CFR 385.211 and
385.214) on or before 5 p.m. Eastern time on the specified comment
date. It is not necessary to separately intervene again in a subdocket
related to a compliance filing if you have previously intervened in the
same docket. Protests will be considered by the Commission in
determining the appropriate action to be taken, but will not serve to
make protestants parties to the proceeding. Anyone filing a motion to
intervene or protest must serve a copy of that document on the
Applicant. In reference to filings initiating a new proceeding,
interventions or protests submitted on or before the comment deadline
need not be served on persons other than the Applicant.
    As it relates to any qualifying facility filings, the notices of
self-certification [or self-recertification] listed above, do not
institute a proceeding regarding qualifying facility status. A notice
of self-certification [or self-recertification] simply provides
notification that the entity making the filing has determined the
facility named in the notice meets the applicable criteria to be a
qualifying facility. Intervention and/or protest do not lie in dockets
that are qualifying facility self-certifications or self-
recertifications. Any person seeking to challenge such qualifying
facility status may do so by filing a motion pursuant to 18 CFR
292.207(d)(iii). Intervention and protests may be filed in response to
notices of qualifying facility dockets other than self-certifications
and self-recertifications.
    The Commission encourages electronic submission of protests and
interventions in lieu of paper, using the FERC Online links at http://
www.ferc.gov. To facilitate electronic service, persons with Internet
access who will eFile a document and/or be listed as a contact for an
intervenor must create and validate an eRegistration account using the

eRegistration link. Select the eFiling link to log on and submit the
intervention or protests.
    Persons unable to file electronically should submit an original and
14 copies of the intervention or protest to the Federal Energy
Regulatory Commission, 888 First St., NE., Washington, DC 20426.
    The filings in the above proceedings are accessible in the
Commission's eLibrary system by clicking on the appropriate link in the
above list. They are also available for review in the Commission's
Public Reference Room in Washington, DC. There is an eSubscription link
on the Web site that enables subscribers to receive e-mail notification
when a document is added to a subscribed docket(s). For assistance with
any FERC Online service, please e-mail<EMAIL_ADDRESS>or
call<PHONE_NUMBER> (toll free). For TTY, call<PHONE_NUMBER>.

Nathaniel J. Davis, Sr.,
Deputy Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2010-25091 Filed 10-5-10; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6717-01-P


[Federal Register: October 6, 2010 (Volume 75, Number 193)]
[Notices]
[Page 61739-61741]
[DOCID:fr06oc10-71]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission

Combined Notice of Filings 1

September 27, 2010.
    Take notice that the Commission received the following electric
rate filings:

    Docket Numbers: ER10-2710-002.
    Applicants: PJM Interconnection, L.L.C.
    Description: PJM Interconnection, L.L.C. submits tariff filing per
35: 20100927--Dominion Virginia H-16 Errata Filing--Pincus to be
effective 9/17/2010.
    Filed Date: 09/27/2010.
    Accession Number: 20100927-5184.
    Comment Date: 5 p.m. Eastern Time on Monday, October 18, 2010.

    Docket Numbers: ER10-2962-000.
    Applicants: Sterling Power Partners, L.P.
    Description: Sterling Power Partners, L.P. submits tariff filing
per 35.12: Sterling Power Partners Baseline Filing to be effective 9/
24/2010.
    Filed Date: 09/24/2010.
    Accession Number: 20100924-5115.
    Comment Date: 5 p.m. Eastern Time on Friday, October 15, 2010.

    Docket Numbers: ER10-2963-000.
    Applicants: Fore River Development, LLC.
    Description: Fore River Development, LLC submits tariff filing per
35.12: Market-Based Rate Tariff in Compliance with Order No. 714 to be
effective 9/24/2010.
    Filed Date: 09/24/2010.
    Accession Number: 20100924-5116.
    Comment Date: 5 p.m. Eastern Time on Friday, October 15, 2010.

    Docket Numbers: ER10-2964-000.
    Applicants: Selkirk Cogen Partners, L.P.
    Description: Selkirk Cogen Partners, L.P. submits tariff filing per
35.12: Selkirk Cogen Partners, L.P. to be effective 9/24/2010.
    Filed Date: 09/24/2010.
    Accession Number: 20100924-5117.
    Comment Date: 5 p.m. Eastern Time on Friday, October 15, 2010.

    Docket Numbers: ER10-2965-000.
    Applicants: Boston Generating, LLC.
    Description: Boston Generating, LLC submits tariff filing per
35.12: Market-Based Rate Tariff in Compliance with Order No. 714 to be
effective 9/24/2010.
    Filed Date: 09/24/2010.
    Accession Number: 20100924-5118.
    Comment Date: 5 p.m. Eastern Time on Friday, October 15, 2010.

    Docket Numbers: ER10-2966-000.
    Applicants: Rumford Falls Hydro LLC.
    Description: Rumford Falls Hydro LLC submits tariff filing per
35.12: Rumford Falls Hydro LLC Baseline Market-Based Rate Tariff to be
effective 9/24/2010.
    Filed Date: 09/24/2010.
    Accession Number: 20100924-5120.
    Comment Date: 5 p.m. Eastern Time on Friday, October 15, 2010.

    Docket Numbers: ER10-2967-000.
    Applicants: Seneca Power Partners, L.P.
    Description: Seneca Power Partners, L.P. submits their Baseline
Filing of FERC Electric Tariff, Ninth Revised Volumen No 1, to be
effective 9/24/2010.
    Filed Date: 09/24/2010.
    Accession Number: 20100924-5123.
    Comment Date: 5 p.m. Eastern Time on Friday, October 15, 2010.

    Docket Numbers: ER10-2968-000.
    Applicants: GenConn Energy LLC.
    Description: GenConn Energy LLC submits tariff filing per 35.12:
GenConn Energy FERC Electric Tariff to be effective 9/24/2010.
    Filed Date: 09/24/2010.
    Accession Number: 20100924-5130.
    Comment Date: 5 p.m. Eastern Time on Friday, October 15, 2010.

    Docket Numbers: ER10-2969-000.
    Applicants: Oswego Harbor Power LLC.
    Description: Oswego Harbor Power LLC submits tariff filing per
35.12: Oswego Harbor Power FERC Electric Tariff to be effective 9/24/
2010.
    Filed Date: 09/24/2010.
    Accession Number: 20100924-5134.
    Comment Date: 5 p.m. Eastern Time on Friday, October 15, 2010.

    Docket Numbers: ER10-2970-000.
    Applicants: Commerce Energy, Inc.
    Description: Commerce Energy, Inc. submits tariff filing per 35.12:
Baseline to be effective 9/24/2010.
    Filed Date: 09/24/2010.
    Accession Number: 20100924-5141.
    Comment Date: 5 p.m. Eastern Time on Friday, October 15, 2010.

    Docket Numbers: ER10-2971-000.
    Applicants: PJM Interconnection, L.L.C.
    Description: PJM Interconnection, L.L.C. submits tariff filing per
35.13(a)(2)(iii): 20100924--Pre-Filing 44 PHP Replacement Capacity
Clarification (Flynn) to be effective 11/23/2010.
    Filed Date: 09/24/2010.
    Accession Number: 20100924-5144.
    Comment Date: 5 p.m. Eastern Time on Friday, October 15, 2010.

    Docket Numbers: ER10-2972-000.
    Applicants: Midwest Independent Transmission System Operator, Inc.
    Description: Midwest Independent Transmission System Operator, Inc.
submits tariff filing per 35.13(a)(2)(iii): Amendment to ATC-LSP GIA to
be effective 12/31/9998.
    Filed Date: 09/24/2010.
    Accession Number: 20100924-5146.
    Comment Date: 5 p.m. Eastern Time on Friday, October 15, 2010.

    Docket Numbers: ER10-2972-000.
    Applicants: Midwest Independent Transmission System Operator, Inc.
    Description: Midwest Independent Transmission System Operator, Inc.
submits tariff filing per 35.13(a)(2)(iii): Amendment to ATC-LSP GIA to
be effective 12/31/9998.
    Filed Date: 09/24/2010.
    Accession Number: 20100924-5147.
    Comment Date: 5 p.m. Eastern Time on Friday, October 15, 2010.

    Docket Numbers: ER10-2973-000.
    Applicants: El Dorado Energy, LLC.
    Description: El Dorado Energy, LLC submits tariff filing per 35.12:
El Dorado Energy, LLC, FERC Electric Tariff No. 1 baseline filing to be
effective 9/24/2010.
    Filed Date: 09/24/2010.
    Accession Number: 20100924-5152.
    Comment Date: 5 p.m. Eastern Time on Friday, October 15, 2010.

    Docket Numbers: ER10-2974-000.
    Applicants: Just Energy (U.S.) Corp.
    Description: Just Energy (U.S.) Corp. submits tariff filing per
35.12: Baseline to be effective 9/24/2010.
    Filed Date: 09/24/2010.
    Accession Number: 20100924-5158.
    Comment Date: 5 p.m. Eastern Time on Friday, October 15, 2010.

    Docket Numbers: ER10-2975-000.
    Applicants: CSW ENERGY SERVICES, INC.
    Description: CSW ENERGY SERVICES, INC. submits tariff filing per
35.12: 20100924--MBR CSW Energy Svcs Baseline to be effective 9/27/
2010.
    Filed Date: 09/24/2010.
    Accession Number: 20100924-5162.
    Comment Date: 5 p.m. Eastern Time on Friday, October 15, 2010.

    Docket Numbers: ER10-2976-000.
    Applicants: Tampa Electric Company.
    Description: Tampa Electric Company submits tariff filing per 35:
Compliance Filing--Sale or Assignment of Transmission Service to be
effective 10/1/2010.
    Filed Date: 09/24/2010.
    Accession Number: 20100924-5169.
    Comment Date: 5 p.m. Eastern Time on Friday, October 15, 2010.

    Docket Numbers: ER10-2977-000.
    Applicants: Mesquite Power, LLC.
    Description: Mesquite Power, LLC submits tariff filing per 35.12:
Mesquite Power, LLC, FERC Electric Tariff No. 1 MBR Tariff baseline
filing to be effective 9/24/2010.
    Filed Date: 09/24/2010.
    Accession Number: 20100924-5172.
    Comment Date: 5 p.m. Eastern Time on Friday, October 15, 2010.

    Docket Numbers: ER10-2978-000.
    Applicants: Pacific Gas and Electric Company.
    Description: Pacific Gas and Electric Company submits tariff filing
per 35.13(a)(2)(iii): Revisions to CAISO Interim Black Start Agreement
Schedule 2 to be effective 9/27/2010.
    Filed Date: 09/24/2010.
    Accession Number: 20100924-5173.
    Comment Date: 5 p.m. Eastern Time on Friday, October 15, 2010.

    Docket Numbers: ER10-2979-000.
    Applicants: California Power Holdings, LLC.
    Description: California Power Holdings, LLC submits its baseline
tariff, FERC Electric Tariff, Volume No 1, to be effective 9/24/2010.
    Filed Date: 09/24/2010.
    Accession Number: 20100924-5188.
    Comment Date: 5 p.m. Eastern Time on Friday, October 15, 2010.

    Docket Numbers: ER10-2980-000.
    Applicants: Castleton Power, LLC.
    Description: Castleton Power, LLC submits tariff filing per 35.12:
Castleton Power FERC Electric Tariff to be effective 9/24/2010.
    Filed Date: 09/24/2010.
    Accession Number: 20100924-5191.
    Comment Date: 5 p.m. Eastern Time on Friday, October 15, 2010.

    Docket Numbers: ER10-2981-000.
    Applicants: AEP Texas Central Company, Public Service Company of
Oklahoma, Southwestern Electric Power Company, AEP Texas North Company.
    Description: AEP Texas Central Company submits tariff filing per
35.12: 20100924 MBR CSW Oper Co Baseline to be effective 9/27/2010.
    Filed Date: 09/24/2010.
    Accession Number: 20100924-5193.
    Comment Date: 5 p.m. Eastern Time on Friday, October 15, 2010.

    Docket Numbers: ER10-2983-000.
    Applicants: Castleton Energy Services, LLC.
    Description: Castleton Energy Services, LLC submits its baseline
tariff, FERC Electric Tariff, Volume No. 1, to be effective 9/24/2010.
    Filed Date: 09/24/2010.
    Accession Number: 20100924-5200.
    Comment Date: 5 p.m. Eastern Time on Friday, October 15, 2010.

    Docket Numbers: ER10-2984-000.
    Applicants: Merrill Lynch Commodities, Inc.
    Description: Merrill Lynch Commodities, Inc. submits tariff filing
per 35.12: Market-based Rate to be effective 9/24/2010.
    Filed Date: 09/24/2010.
    Accession Number: 20100924-5204.
    Comment Date: 5 p.m. Eastern Time on Friday, October 15, 2010.

    Docket Numbers: ER10-2985-000.
    Applicants: Champion Energy Marketing, LLC.
    Description: Champion Energy Marketing, LLC submits tariff filing
per 35.12: Baseline to be effective 9/24/2010.
    Filed Date: 09/24/2010.
    Accession Number: 20100924-5205.
    Comment Date: 5 p.m. Eastern Time on Friday, October 15, 2010.

    Docket Numbers: ER10-2986-000.
    Applicants: PJM Interconnection, L.L.C.
    Description: PJM Interconnection, L.L.C. submits tariff filing per
35.13(a)(2)(iii) 20100924--Pre-Filing 046 Excess Congestion Credit
(Flynn) to be effective 9/17/2010.
    Filed Date: 09/24/2010.
    Accession Number: 20100924-5207.
    Comment Date: 5 p.m. Eastern Time on Friday, October 15, 2010.

    Docket Numbers: ER10-2987-000.
    Applicants: Southern California Edison Company.
    Description: Southern California Edison Company submits tariff
filing per 35.13(a)(2)(iii): SGIA & Service Agmt for Wholesale Distrib
Serv with Greenpower Williams LLC to be effective 9/28/2010.
    Filed Date: 09/27/2010.
    Accession Number: 20100927-5000.
    Comment Date: 5 p.m. Eastern Time on Monday, October 18, 2010.

    Docket Numbers: ER10-2988-000.
    Applicants: Thompson River Power, LLC.
    Description: Thompson River Power, LLC submits tariff filing per
35.12: Thompson River Power FERC Electric Tariff to be effective 9/24/
2010.
    Filed Date: 09/27/2010.
    Accession Number: 20100927-5039.
    Comment Date: 5 p.m. Eastern Time on Monday, October 18, 2010.

    Docket Numbers: ER10-2989-000.
    Applicants: Solios Power Trading LLC.
    Description: Solios Power Trading LLC submits tariff filing per
35.12: Solios Power Trading LLC, FERC Electric Tariff Original Volume
No. 1 to be effective 9/27/2010.
    Filed Date: 09/27/2010.
    Accession Number: 20100927-5040.
    Comment Date: 5 p.m. Eastern Time on Monday, October 18, 2010.

    Docket Numbers: ER10-2990-000.
    Applicants: Potomac Power Resources, Inc.
    Description: Potomac Power Resources, Inc. submits tariff filing
per 35.12: Potomac Power Market Based Rate Tariff Baseline Filing to be
effective 9/27/2010.
    Filed Date: 09/27/2010.
    Accession Number: 20100927-5042.
    Comment Date: 5 p.m. Eastern Time on Monday, October 18, 2010.

    Docket Numbers: ER10-2991-000.
    Applicants: Solios Power Mid-Atlantic Trading, LLC.
    Description: Solios Power Mid-Atlantic Trading, LLC submits tariff
filing per 35.12: Solios Power Mid-Atlantic Trading LLC, FERC Elec Trf
Orig Vol 1 to be effective 9/27/2010.
    Filed Date: 09/27/2010.
    Accession Number: 20100927-5043.
    Comment Date: 5 p.m. Eastern Time on Monday, October 18, 2010.

    Docket Numbers: ER10-2992-000.
    Applicants: Pepco Energy Services, Inc.
    Description: Pepco Energy Services, Inc. submits tariff filing per
35.12: Pepco Energy Services Market Based Rate Tariff Baseline Filing
to be effective 9/27/2010.
    Filed Date: 09/27/2010.
    Accession Number: 20100927-5044.
    Comment Date: 5 p.m. Eastern Time on Monday, October 18, 2010.

    Docket Numbers: ER10-2993-000.
    Applicants: Solios Power Midwest Trading LLC.
    Description: Solios Power Midwest Trading LLC submits tariff filing
per 35.12: Solios Power Midwest Trading LLC, FERC Electric Tariff,
Original Vol. No. 1 to be effective 9/27/2010.
    Filed Date: 09/27/2010.
    Accession Number: 20100927-5045.
    Comment Date: 5 p.m. Eastern Time on Monday, October 18, 2010.

    Docket Numbers: ER10-2994-000.
    Applicants: Iberdrola Renewables, Inc.
    Description: Iberdrola Renewables, Inc. submits tariff filing per
35.12: Baseline Filing of Market-Based Rate Tariff to be effective 9/
27/2010.
    Filed Date: 09/27/2010.
    Accession Number: 20100927-5046.
    Comment Date: 5 p.m. Eastern Time on Monday, October 18, 2010.

    Docket Numbers: ER10-2995-000.
    Applicants: Juniper Canyon Wind Power LLC.
    Description: Juniper Canyon Wind Power LLC submits tariff filing
per 35.12: Baseline Filing of Market-Based Rate Tariff to be effective
9/27/2010.
    Filed Date: 09/27/2010.
    Accession Number: 20100927-5049.
    Comment Date: 5 p.m. Eastern Time on Monday, October 18, 2010.

    Docket Numbers: ER10-2996-000.
    Applicants: Klamath Energy LLC.
    Description: Klamath Energy LLC submits tariff filing per 35.12:
Baseline Filing of Market-Based Rate Tariff to be effective 9/27/2010.
    Filed Date: 09/27/2010.
    Accession Number: 20100927-5053.
    Comment Date: 5 p.m. Eastern Time on Monday, October 18, 2010.

    Any person desiring to intervene or to protest in any of the above
proceedings must file in accordance with Rules 211 and 214 of the
Commission's Rules of Practice and Procedure (18 CFR 385.211 and
385.214) on or before 5 p.m. Eastern time on the specified comment
date. It is not necessary to separately intervene again in a subdocket
related to a compliance filing if you have previously intervened in the
same docket. Protests will be considered by the Commission in
determining the appropriate action to be taken, but will not serve to
make protestants parties to the proceeding. Anyone filing a motion to
intervene or protest must serve a copy of that document on the
Applicant. In reference to filings initiating a new proceeding,
interventions or protests submitted on or before the comment deadline
need not be served on persons other than the Applicant.
    As it relates to any qualifying facility filings, the notices of
self-certification [or self-recertification] listed above, do not
institute a proceeding regarding qualifying facility status. A notice
of self-certification [or self-recertification] simply provides
notification that the entity making the filing has determined the
facility named in the notice meets the applicable criteria to be a
qualifying facility. Intervention and/or protest do not lie in dockets
that are qualifying facility self-certifications or self-
recertifications. Any person seeking to challenge such qualifying
facility status may do so by filing a motion pursuant to 18 CFR
292.207(d)(iii). Intervention and protests may be filed in response to
notices of qualifying facility dockets other than self-certifications
and self-recertifications.
    The Commission encourages electronic submission of protests and
interventions in lieu of paper, using the FERC Online links at http://
www.ferc.gov. To facilitate electronic service, persons with Internet
access who will eFile a document and/or be listed as a contact for an
intervenor must create and validate an eRegistration account using the
eRegistration link. Select the eFiling link to log on and submit the
intervention or protests.
    Persons unable to file electronically should submit an original and
14 copies of the intervention or protest to the Federal Energy
Regulatory Commission, 888 First St., NE., Washington, DC 20426.
    The filings in the above proceedings are accessible in the
Commission's eLibrary system by clicking on the appropriate link in the
above list. They are also available for review in the Commission's
Public Reference Room in Washington, DC. There is an eSubscription link
on the Web site that enables subscribers to receive e-mail notification
when a document is added to a subscribed docket(s). For assistance with
any FERC Online service, please e-mail<EMAIL_ADDRESS>or
call<PHONE_NUMBER> (toll free). For TTY, call<PHONE_NUMBER>.

Nathaniel J. Davis, Sr.,
Deputy Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2010-25093 Filed 10-5-10; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6717-01-P


[Federal Register Volume 80, Number 123 (Friday, June 26, 2015)]
[Notices]
[Page 36806]
[FR Doc No: 2015-15772]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY

[EPA-HQ-OA-2008-0701; FRL-9928-43-OEI]

Information Collection Request Submitted to OMB for Review and
Approval; Comment Request; Focus Groups as Used by EPA for Economics
Projects (Renewal)

AGENCY: Environmental Protection Agency (EPA).

ACTION: Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Environmental Protection Agency has submitted an
information collection request (ICR), ``Focus Groups as used by EPA for
Economics Projects (Renewal)'' (EPA ICR No. 2205.15, OMB Control No.
2090-0028) to the Office of Management and Budget (OMB) for review and
approval in accordance with the Paperwork Reduction Act (44 U.S.C. 3501
et seq.). This is a proposed extension of the ICR, which is currently
approved through June 30, 2015. Public comments were previously
requested via the Federal Register (80 FR 6075) on February 4, 2015
during a 60-day comment period. This notice allows for an additional 30
days for public comments. A fuller description of the ICR is given
below, including its estimated burden and cost to the public. An Agency
may not conduct or sponsor and a person is not required to respond to a
collection of information unless it displays a currently valid OMB
control number.

DATES: Additional comments may be submitted on or before July 27, 2015.

ADDRESSES: Submit your comments, referencing Docket ID. EPA-HQ-OA-2008-
0701, to (1) EPA online using www.regulations.gov (our preferred
method), by email to<EMAIL_ADDRESS>or by mail to: EPA Docket
Center, Environmental Protection Agency, Mail Code 28221T, 1200
Pennsylvania Ave. NW., Washington, DC 20460, and (2) OMB via email to
<EMAIL_ADDRESS>Address comments to OMB Desk Officer for
EPA.
    EPA's policy is that all comments received will be included in the
public docket without change including any personal information
provided, unless the comment includes profanity, threats, information
claimed to be Confidential Business Information (CBI) or other
information whose disclosure is restricted by statute.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Nathalie Simon, National Center for
Environmental Economics, Office of Policy, (1809T), Environmental
Protection Agency, 1200 Pennsylvania Ave. NW., Washington, DC 20460;
telephone number:<PHONE_NUMBER>; fax number:<PHONE_NUMBER>; email
address<EMAIL_ADDRESS>
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Supporting documents which explain in detail
the information that the EPA will be collecting are available in the
public docket for this ICR. The docket can be viewed online at
www.regulations.gov or in person at the EPA Docket Center, WJC West,
Room 3334, 1301 Constitution Ave. NW., Washington, DC. The telephone
number for the Docket Center is<PHONE_NUMBER>. For additional
information about EPA's public docket, visit http://www.epa.gov/dockets.
    Abstract: EPA is seeking renewal of a generic information
collection request (ICR) for the conduct of focus groups and one-on-one
interviews primarily related to survey development for economics
projects. These groups are typically formed to gain insight and
understanding of attitudes and perceptions held by the public
surrounding a particular issue.
    Focus groups and one-on-one interviews used as a qualitative
research tool serve to better understand respondents' attitudes,
perceptions and emotions in response to specific topics and concepts;
to obtain respondent information useful for better defining variables
and measures in later quantitative studies; and to further explore
findings obtained from quantitative studies.
    Through these focus groups, the Agency will be able to gain a more
in-depth understanding of the public's attitudes, beliefs, motivations
and feelings regarding specific issues and will provide invaluable
information regarding the quality of draft survey instruments.
Participation in the focus groups is voluntary. Each focus group will
fully conform to federal regulations--specifically the Privacy Act of
1974 (5 U.S.C. 552a), the Hawkins-Stafford Amendments of 1988 (Pub. L.
100-297), and the Computer Security Act of 1987.
    Form Numbers: None.
    Respondents/affected entities: Individuals.
    Respondent's obligation to respond: Voluntary.
    Estimated number of respondents: 1,584 (total).
    Frequency of response: Once.
    Total estimated burden: 915 hours (per year). Burden is defined at
5 CFR 1320.03(b).
    Total estimated cost: $30,302 (per year), includes $0 annualized
capital or operation & maintenance costs.
    Changes in the Estimates: There is a decrease of 3,163 hours in the
total estimated respondent burden compared with the ICR currently
approved by OMB. This decrease is based on new estimates of projected
use of this ICR for focus groups for the next three years provided by
the program offices at EPA.

Courtney Kerwin,
Acting Director, Collection Strategies Division.
[FR Doc. 2015-15772 Filed 6-25-15; 8:45 am]
 BILLING CODE 6560-50-P


[Federal Register Volume 88, Number 84 (Tuesday, May 2, 2023)]
[Notices]
[Pages 27498-27499]
[FR Doc No: 2023-09242]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission

Combined Notice of Filings

    Take notice that the Commission has received the following Natural
Gas & Oil Pipeline Rate and Refund Report filings:

Filings Instituting Proceedings

    Docket Numbers: RP23-707-000.
    Applicants: Wyoming Interstate Company, L.L.C.
    Description: Sec.  4(d) Rate Filing: Fuel_LU Quarterly Update
Filing June 1, 2023 to be effective 6/1/2023.
    Filed Date: 4/25/23.
    Accession Number: 20230425-5166.
    Comment Date: 5 p.m. ET 5/8/23.

    Docket Numbers: RP23-708-000.
    Applicants: BP Canada Energy Marketing Corp., BP Energy Company.
    Description: Joint Petition for Limited Waiver of Capacity Release
Regulations, et al. of BP Energy Co., et al.
    Filed Date: 4/25/23.
    Accession Number: 20230425-5290.
    Comment Date: 5 p.m. ET 5/8/23.

    Docket Numbers: RP23-709-000.
    Applicants: Transwestern Pipeline Company, LLC.
    Description: Sec.  4(d) Rate Filing: Negotiated Rates Filing--NRA
Concord & Talen/XTO Name Change to be effective 5/1/2023.
    Filed Date: 4/26/23.
    Accession Number: 20230426-5085.
    Comment Date: 5 p.m. ET 5/8/23.
    Any person desiring to intervene or protest in any of the above
proceedings must file in accordance with Rules 211 and 214 of the
Commission's Regulations (18 CFR 385.211 and 385.214) on or before 5:00
p.m. Eastern time on the specified comment date. Protests may be
considered, but intervention is necessary to become a party to the
proceeding.

Filings in Existing Proceedings

    Docket Numbers: RP19-423-004.
    Applicants: Tallgrass Interstate Gas Transmission, LLC.
    Description: Petition to Amend Settlement of Tallgrass Interstate
Gas Transmission, LLC.
    Filed Date: 4/25/23.
    Accession Number: 20230425-5325.
    Comment Date: 5 p.m. ET 5/8/23.

    Any person desiring to protest in any the above proceedings must
file in accordance with Rule 211 of the Commission's Regulations (18
CFR 385.211) on or before 5:00 p.m. Eastern time on the specified
comment date.
    The filings are accessible in the Commission's eLibrary system
(https://

elibrary.ferc.gov/idmws/search/fercgensearch.asp) by querying the
docket number.
    eFiling is encouraged. More detailed information relating to filing
requirements, interventions, protests, service, and qualifying
facilities filings can be found at: http://www.ferc.gov/docs-filing/efiling/filing-req.pdf. For other information, call<PHONE_NUMBER>
(toll free). For TTY, call<PHONE_NUMBER>.

    Dated: April 26, 2023.
Debbie-Anne A. Reese,
Deputy Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2023-09242 Filed 5-1-23; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6717-01-P


[Federal Register: August 23, 2010 (Volume 75, Number 162)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Page 51663-51666]
[DOCID:fr23au10-10]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION

Federal Aviation Administration

14 CFR Part 97

[Docket No. 30738; Amdt. No. 3386]

Standard Instrument Approach Procedures, and Takeoff Minimums and
Obstacle Departure Procedures; Miscellaneous Amendments

AGENCY: Federal Aviation Administration (FAA), DOT.

ACTION: Final rule.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: This establishes, amends, suspends, or revokes Standard
Instrument Approach Procedures (SIAPs) and associated Takeoff Minimums
and Obstacle Departure Procedures for operations at certain airports.
These regulatory actions are needed because of the adoption of new or
revised criteria, or because of changes occurring in the National
Airspace System, such as the commissioning of new navigational
facilities, adding new obstacles, or changing air traffic requirements.
These changes are designed to provide safe and efficient use of the
navigable airspace and to promote safe flight operations under
instrument flight rules at the affected airports.

DATES: This rule is effective August 23, 2010. The compliance date for
each SIAP, associated Takeoff Minimums, and ODP is specified in the
amendatory provisions.
    The incorporation by reference of certain publications listed in
the regulations is approved by the Director of the Federal Register as
of August 23, 2010.

ADDRESSES: Availability of matters incorporated by reference in the
amendment is as follows:
    For Examination--
    1. FAA Rules Docket, FAA Headquarters Building, 800 Independence
Avenue, SW., Washington, DC 20591;
    2. The FAA Regional Office of the region in which the affected
airport is located;
    3. The National Flight Procedures Office, 6500 South MacArthur
Blvd., Oklahoma City, OK 73169 or
    4. The National Archives and Records Administration (NARA). For
information on the availability of this material at NARA, call 202-741-
6030, or go to: http://www.archives.gov/federal_register/code_of_
federal_regulations/ibr_locations.html.
    Availability--All SIAPs and Takeoff Minimums and ODPs are available
online free of charge. Visit http://www.nfdc.faa.gov to register.
Additionally, individual SIAP and Takeoff Minimums and ODP copies may
be obtained from:
    1. FAA Public Inquiry Center (APA-200), FAA Headquarters Building,
800 Independence Avenue, SW., Washington, DC 20591; or
    2. The FAA Regional Office of the region in which the affected
airport is located.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Harry J. Hodges, Flight Procedure
Standards Branch (AFS-420), Flight Technologies and Programs Divisions,
Flight Standards Service, Federal Aviation Administration, Mike
Monroney Aeronautical Center, 6500 South MacArthur Blvd., Oklahoma
City, OK 73169 (Mail Address: P.O. Box 25082, Oklahoma City, OK 73125)
Telephone:<PHONE_NUMBER>.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: This rule amends Title 14 of the Code of
Federal Regulations, Part 97 (14 CFR part 97), by establishing,
amending, suspending, or revoking SIAPs, Takeoff Minimums and/or ODPs.
The complete regulators description of each SIAP and its associated
Takeoff Minimums or ODP for an identified airport is listed on FAA form
documents which are incorporated by reference in this amendment under 5
U.S.C. 552(a), 1 CFR part 51, and 14 CFR part 97.20. The applicable FAA
Forms are FAA Forms 8260-3, 8260-4, 8260-5, 8260-15A, and 8260-15B when
required by an entry on 8260-15A.
    The large number of SIAPs, Takeoff Minimums and ODPs, in addition
to their complex nature and the need for a special format make
publication in the Federal Register expensive and impractical.
Furthermore, airmen do not use the regulatory text of the SIAPs,
Takeoff Minimums or ODPs, but instead refer to their depiction on
charts printed by publishers of aeronautical materials. The advantages
of incorporation by reference are realized and publication of the
complete description of each SIAP, Takeoff Minimums and ODP listed on
FAA forms is unnecessary. This amendment provides the affected CFR
sections and specifies the types of SIAPs and the effective dates of
the associated Takeoff Minimums and ODPs. This amendment also
identifies the airport and its location, the procedure, and the
amendment number.

The Rule

    This amendment to 14 CFR part 97 is effective upon publication of
each separate SIAP, Takeoff Minimums and ODP as contained in the
transmittal. Some SIAP and Takeoff Minimums and textual ODP amendments
may have been issued previously by the FAA in a Flight Data Center
(FDC) Notice to Airmen (NOTAM) as an emergency action of immediate
flight safety relating directly to published aeronautical charts. The
circumstances which created the need for some SIAP and Takeoff Minimums
and ODP amendments may require making them effective in less than 30
days. For the remaining SIAPs and Takeoff Minimums and ODPs, an
effective date at least 30 days after publication is provided.
    Further, the SIAPs and Takeoff Minimums and ODPs contained in this
amendment are based on the criteria contained in the U.S. Standard for
Terminal Instrument Procedures (TERPS). In developing these SIAPS and
Takeoff Minimums and ODPs, the TERPS criteria were applied to the
conditions existing or anticipated at the affected airports. Because of
the close and immediate relationship between these SIAPs, Takeoff
Minimums and ODPs, and safety in air commerce, I find that notice and
public procedures before adopting these SIAPS, Takeoff

Minimums and ODPs are impracticable and contrary to the public interest
and, where applicable, that good cause exists for making some SIAPs
effective in less than 30 days.

Conclusion

    The FAA has determined that this regulation only involves an
established body of technical regulations for which frequent and
routine amendments are necessary to keep them operationally current.
It, therefore--(1) Is not a ``significant regulatory action'' under
Executive Order 12866; (2) is not a ``significant rule'' under DOT
Regulatory Policies and Procedures (44 FR 11034; February 26, 1979);
and (3) does not warrant preparation of a regulatory evaluation as the
anticipated impact is so minimal. For the same reason, the FAA
certifies that this amendment will not have a significant economic
impact on a substantial number of small entities under the criteria of
the Regulatory Flexibility Act.

List of Subjects in 14 CFR Part 97

    Air traffic control, Airports, Incorporation by reference, and
Navigation (air).

    Issued in Washington, DC, on August 6, 2010.
John M. Allen,
Director, Flight Standards Service.

Adoption of the Amendment

0
Accordingly, pursuant to the authority delegated to me, Title 14, Code
of Federal Regulations, part 97 (14 CFR part 97) is amended by
establishing, amending, suspending, or revoking Standard Instrument
Approach Procedures and/or Takeoff Minimums and/or Obstacle Departure
Procedures effective at 0902 UTC on the dates specified, as follows:

PART 97--STANDARD INSTRUMENT APPROACH PROCEDURES

0
1. The authority citation for part 97 continues to read as follows:

    Authority:  49 U.S.C. 106(g), 40103, 40106, 40113, 40114, 40120,
44502, 44514, 44701, 44719, 44721-44722.

0
2. Part 97 is amended to read as follows:

Shungnak, AK, Shungnak, RNAV (GPS) RWY 9, Amdt 1
Shungnak, AK, Shungnak, RNAV (GPS) RWY 27, Amdt 1
Bessemer, AL, Bessemer, GPS RWY 23, Orig-A, CANCELLED
Bessemer, AL, Bessemer, ILS OR LOC RWY 5, Amdt 2
Bessemer, AL, Bessemer, RNAV (GPS) RWY 5, Amdt 1
Bessemer, AL, Bessemer, RNAV (GPS) RWY 23, Orig
Vernon, AL, Lamar County, Takeoff Minimums and Obstacle DP, Amdt 2
Lincoln, CA, Lincoln Rgnl/Karl Harder Field, ILS OR LOC RWY 15, Amdt
1
Lincoln, CA, Lincoln Rgnl/Karl Harder Field, RNAV (GPS) RWY 15, Orig
Paso Robles, CA, Paso Robles Muni, RNAV (GPS) RWY 19, Orig
Paso Robles, CA, Paso Robles Muni, VOR/DME RWY 19, Amdt 4
Paso Robles, CA, Paso Robles Muni, VOR/DME-B, Amdt 3
Paso Robles, CA, Paso Robles Muni, VOR OR GPS-A, Amdt 1, CANCELLED
Santa Rosa, CA, Charles M Schulz-Sonoma County, RNAV (GPS) RWY 14,
Amdt 1
Colorado Springs, CO, City of Colorado Springs Muni, ILS OR LOC RWY
17L, Amdt 1
Colorado Springs, CO, City of Colorado Springs Muni, ILS OR LOC RWY
35L, Amdt 37
Colorado Springs, CO, City of Colorado Springs Muni, ILS OR LOC RWY
35R, Amdt 1
Colorado Springs, CO, City of Colorado Springs Muni, NDB RWY 35L,
Amdt 26
Colorado Springs, CO, City of Colorado Springs Muni, RNAV (GPS) RWY
31, Amdt 1
Colorado Springs, CO, City of Colorado Springs Muni, RNAV (GPS) Y
RWY 17L, Amdt 1
Colorado Springs, CO, City of Colorado Springs Muni, RNAV (GPS) Y
RWY 35L, Orig
Colorado Springs, CO, City of Colorado Springs Muni, RNAV (GPS) Y
RWY 35R, Amdt 3
Colorado Springs, CO, City of Colorado Springs Muni, Takeoff
Minimums and Obstacle DP, Amdt 9
Longmont, CO, Vance Brand, RNAV (GPS) RWY 29, Amdt 1A
Windsor Locks, CT, Bradley Intl, RNAV (GPS) Y RWY 15, Amdt 1A
Palatka, FL, Palatka Muni-Lt. Kay Larkin Field, NDB RWY 9, Amdt 3
Palatka, FL, Palatka Muni-Lt. Kay Larkin Field, RNAV (GPS) RWY 9,
Orig
Palatka, FL, Palatka Muni-Lt. Kay Larkin Field, RNAV (GPS) RWY 27,
Orig
Tifton, GA, Henry Tift Myers, NDB RWY 33, Amdt 1
Tifton, GA, Henry Tift Myers, RNAV (GPS) RWY 28, Orig
Tifton, GA, Henry Tift Myers, RNAV (GPS) RWY 33, Orig
Tifton, GA, Henry Tift Myers, VOR RWY 28, Amdt 10
Cedar Rapids, IA, The Eastern Iowa, RNAV (GPS) RWY 8, Orig,
CANCELLED
Cedar Rapids, IA, The Eastern Iowa, RNAV (GPS) RWY 9, Amdt 2
Cedar Rapids, IA, The Eastern Iowa, RNAV (GPS) RWY 26, Orig,
CANCELLED
Cedar Rapids, IA, The Eastern Iowa, Takeoff Minimums and Obstacle
DP, Amdt 4
Cedar Rapids, IA, The Eastern Iowa, VOR RWY 26, Orig, CANCELLED
Cedar Rapids, IA, The Eastern Iowa, VOR/DME RWY 8, Orig, CANCELLED
Cedar Rapids, IA, The Eastern Iowa, VOR/DME RWY 9, Amdt 17
Fort Madison, IA, Fort Madison Muni, RNAV (GPS) RWY 17, Orig
Fort Madison, IA, Fort Madison Muni, RNAV (GPS) RWY 35, Orig
Fort Madison, IA, Fort Madison Muni, Takeoff Minimums and Obstacle
DP, Orig
Fort Madison, IA, Fort Madison Muni, VOR/DME-A, Amdt 7
Fort Madison, IA, Fort Madison Muni, VOR/DME RNAV OR GPS RWY 16,
Amdt 4A, CANCELLED
Fort Madison, IA, Fort Madison Muni, VOR/DME RNAV OR GPS RWY 34,
Amdt 4A, CANCELLED
Jefferson, IA, Jefferson Muni, Takeoff Minimums and Obstacle DP,
Amdt 3
Cahokia/St Louis, IL, St. Louis Downtown, Takeoff Minimum and
Obstacle DP, Amdt 8
Champaign/Urbana, IL, University of Illinois-Willard, GPS RWY 18,
Orig-B, CANCELLED
Champaign/Urbana, IL, University of Illinois-Willard, GPS RWY 36,
Orig-B, CANCELLED
Champaign/Urbana, IL, University of Illinois-Willard, LOC/DME BC RWY
14L, Amdt 8
Champaign/Urbana, IL, University of Illinois-Willard, RNAV (GPS) RWY
14L, Orig
Champaign/Urbana, IL, University of Illinois-Willard, RNAV (GPS) RWY
18, Orig
Champaign/Urbana, IL, University of Illinois-Willard, RNAV (GPS) RWY
22, Amdt 1
Champaign/Urbana, IL, University of Illinois-Willard, RNAV (GPS) RWY
36, Orig
Champaign/Urbana, IL, University of Illinois-Willard, VOR/DME RWY
14L, Orig-A
Harrisburg, IL, Harrisburg-Raleigh, NDB RWY 24, Amdt 11
Harrisburg, IL, Harrisburg-Raleigh, RNAV (GPS) RWY 6, Amdt 1
Harrisburg, IL, Harrisburg-Raleigh, RNAV (GPS) RWY 24, Amdt 2
Harrisburg, IL, Harrisburg-Raleigh, Takeoff Minimums and Obstacle
DP, Amdt 1
Norton, KS, Norton Muni, NDB RWY 16, Amdt 2
Norton, KS, Norton Muni, NDB RWY 34, Amdt 2
Norton, KS, Norton Muni, RNAV (GPS) RWY 16, Amdt 1
Norton, KS, Norton Muni, RNAV (GPS) RWY 34, Amdt 1
Greenville, KY, Muhlenberg County, RNAV (GPS) RWY 23, Orig
Greenville, KY, Muhlenberg County, VOR/DME-A, Amdt 5
New Orleans, LA, Louis Armstrong New Orleans Intl, ILS OR LOC RWY
28, Amdt 8
New Orleans, LA, Louis Armstrong New Orleans Intl, LOC RWY 19, Amdt
2
New Orleans, LA, Louis Armstrong New Orleans Intl, RNAV (GPS) Y RWY
10, Amdt 1
New Orleans, LA, Louis Armstrong New Orleans Intl, RNAV (GPS) Y RWY
19, Amdt 2
New Orleans, LA, Louis Armstrong New Orleans Intl, RNAV (RNP) Z RWY
10, Orig
New Orleans, LA, Louis Armstrong New Orleans Intl, RNAV (RNP) Z RWY
19, Orig
New Orleans, LA, Louis Armstrong New Orleans Intl, RNAV (RNP) Z RWY
28, Orig
Baltimore, MD, Baltimore-Washington Intl Thurgood Marshall, Takeoff
Minimums and Obstacle DP, Amdt 9

Baltimore, MD, Martin State, ILS OR LOC RWY 33, Amdt 7, CANCELLED
Baltimore, MD, Martin State, LDA RWY 33, Orig
Muskegon, MI, Muskegon County, ILS OR LOC RWY 24, Amdt 5
Muskegon, MI, Muskegon County, RNAV (GPS) RWY 6, Amdt 1
Muskegon, MI, Muskegon County, RNAV (GPS) RWY 24, Amdt 1
Farmington, MO, Farmington Rgnl, Takeoff Minimums and Obstacle DP,
Amdt 5
Rolla/Vichy, MO, Rolla National, GPS RWY 4, Orig, CANCELLED
Rolla/Vichy, MO, Rolla National, RNAV (GPS) RWY 4, Orig
Rolla/Vichy, MO, Rolla National, RNAV (GPS) RWY 22, Orig
Rolla/Vichy, MO, Rolla National, Takeoff Minimums and Obstacle DP,
Orig
Rolla/Vichy, MO, Rolla National, VOR RWY 22, Amdt 8
Rolla/Vichy, MO, Rolla National, VOR/DME RWY 4, Amdt 3
Rolla/Vichy, MO, Rolla National, VOR/DME RNAV OR GPS RWY 22, Amdt
2C, CANCELLED
St Joseph, MO, Rosecrans Memorial, RNAV (GPS) RWY 35, Amdt 1
St Louis, MO, Spirit of St. Louis, Takeoff Minimums and Obstacle DP,
Amdt 1
Missoula, MT, Missoula Intl, GPS-D, Orig-A, CANCELLED
Missoula, MT, Missoula Intl, ILS Y RWY 11, Orig
Missoula, MT, Missoula Intl, ILS Z RWY 11, Amdt 12
Missoula, MT, Missoula Intl, RNAV (GPS)-D, Orig
Missoula, MT, Missoula Intl, VOR/DME-A, Amdt 12
Missoula, MT, Missoula Intl, VOR/DME-B, Amdt 6
Elizabethtown, NC, Curtis L Brown JR Field, GPS RWY 15, Orig,
CANCELLED
Elizabethtown, NC, Curtis L Brown JR Field, GPS RWY 33, Orig,
CANCELLED
Elizabethtown, NC, Curtis L Brown JR Field, RNAV (GPS) RWY 15, Orig
Elizabethtown, NC, Curtis L Brown JR Field, RNAV (GPS) RWY 33, Orig
Elizabethtown, NC, Curtis L Brown JR Field, VOR/DME RWY 15, Amdt 2
Jefferson, NC, Ashe County, LOC RWY 28, Amdt 2
Alliance, NE, Alliance Muni, ILS OR LOC/DME RWY 30, Orig
Alliance, NE, Alliance Muni, LOC/DME RWY 30, Orig-B, CANCELLED
Alliance, NE, Alliance Muni, RNAV (GPS) RWY 30, Amdt 1
Hammonton, NJ, Hammonton Muni, RNAV (GPS) RWY 3, Amdt 1
Hammonton, NJ, Hammonton Muni, VOR-A, Amdt 7
Hammonton, NJ, Hammonton Muni, VOR-B, Amdt 2
Newark, NJ, Newark Liberty Intl, ILS OR LOC RWY 11, Amdt 2
Newark, NJ, Newark Liberty Intl, ILS OR LOC RWY 22R, Amdt 5
Deming, NM, Deming Muni, RNAV (GPS) RWY 4, Amdt 1
Deming, NM, Deming Muni, RNAV (GPS) RWY 8, Orig
Deming, NM, Deming Muni, RNAV (GPS) RWY 22, Orig
Weedsport, NY, Whitfords, VOR-A, Orig-B, CANCELLED
Columbus, OH, Port Columbus Intl, RNAV (GPS) Y RWY 10L, Amdt 2
Columbus, OH, Port Columbus Intl, RNAV (GPS) Y RWY 10R, Amdt 2
Columbus, OH, Port Columbus Intl, RNAV (GPS) Y RWY 28L, Amdt 2
Columbus, OH, Port Columbus Intl, RNAV (GPS) Y RWY 28R, Amdt 1
Columbus, OH, Port Columbus Intl, RNAV (RNP) Z RWY 10L, Orig
Columbus, OH, Port Columbus Intl, RNAV (RNP) Z RWY 10R, Orig
Columbus, OH, Port Columbus Intl, RNAV (RNP) Z RWY 28L, Orig
Columbus, OH, Port Columbus Intl, RNAV (RNP) Z RWY 28R, Orig
Dayton, OH, James M Cox Dayton Intl, RADAR-1, Amdt 9, CANCELLED
Mansfield, OH, Mansfield Lahm Rgnl, RNAV (GPS) RWY 5, Orig
Mansfield, OH, Mansfield Lahm Rgnl, RNAV (GPS) RWY 23, Orig
Mansfield, OH, Mansfield Lahm Rgnl, VOR/DME RNAV OR GPS RWY 23, Amdt
6A, CANCELLED
Blackwell, OK, Blackwell-Tonkawa Muni, GPS RWY 17, Orig-A, CANCELLED
Blackwell, OK, Blackwell-Tonkawa Muni, GPS RWY 35, Orig-A, CANCELLED
Blackwell, OK, Blackwell-Tonkawa Muni, RNAV (GPS) RWY 17, Orig
Blackwell, OK, Blackwell-Tonkawa Muni, RNAV (GPS) RWY 35, Orig
Blackwell, OK, Blackwell-Tonkawa Muni, VOR-A, Amdt 4
Duncan, OK, Halliburton Field, LOC RWY 35, Amdt 5
Duncan, OK, Halliburton Field, RNAV (GPS) RWY 17, Amdt 1
Duncan, OK, Halliburton Field, RNAV (GPS) RWY 35, Amdt 1
Duncan, OK, Halliburton Field, VOR RWY 35, Amdt 12
Shawnee, OK, Shawnee Rgnl, ILS OR LOC RWY 17, Amdt 2
Shawnee, OK, Shawnee Rgnl, RNAV (GPS) RWY 17, Amdt 1
Tulsa, OK, Tulsa Intl, RNAV (GPS) RWY 8, Amdt 1
Tulsa, OK, Tulsa Intl, RNAV (GPS) Y RWY 26, Amdt 3
Tulsa, OK, Tulsa Intl, VOR/DME RWY 8, Amdt 4
Tulsa, OK, Tulsa Intl, VOR OR TACAN RWY 26, Amdt 24
Eugene, OR, Mahlon Sweet Field, GPS RWY 16R, Orig-C, CANCELLED
Eugene, OR, Mahlon Sweet Field, ILS OR LOC/DME RWY 16R, ILS RWY 16R
(CAT II), ILS RWY 16R (CAT III), Amdt 36
Eugene, OR, Mahlon Sweet Field, ILS OR LOC Y RWY 16R, Orig,
CANCELLED
Eugene, OR, Mahlon Sweet Field, RNAV (GPS) RWY 16R, Orig
Eugene, OR, Mahlon Sweet Field, RNAV (GPS) RWY 34L, Amdt 1
Eugene, OR, Mahlon Sweet Field, RNAV (GPS) RWY 34R, Amdt 1
Eugene, OR, Mahlon Sweet Field, Takeoff Minimums and Obstacle DP,
Amdt 7
Eugene, OR, Mahlon Sweet Field, VOR-A, Amdt 7
Eugene, OR, Mahlon Sweet Field, VOR/DME OR TACAN RWY 16R, Amdt 5
Eugene, OR, Mahlon Sweet Field, VOR/DME OR TACAN RWY 34L, Amdt 5
Klamath Falls, OR, Klamath Falls, VOR/DME OR TACAN RWY 14, Amdt 5A
Bradford, PA, Bradford Rgnl, ILS OR LOC RWY 32, Amdt 12
Bradford, PA, Bradford Rgnl, RNAV (GPS) RWY 14, Amdt 1
Bradford, PA, Bradford Rgnl, RNAV (GPS) RWY 32, Amdt 1
Bradford, PA, Bradford Rgnl, RNAV (GPS) Z RWY 14, Orig-A, CANCELLED
Bradford, PA, Bradford Rgnl, VOR RWY 14, Amdt 1
Bradford, PA, Bradford Rgnl, VOR/DME RWY 14, Amdt 10
Myrtle Beach, SC, Myrtle Beach Intl, ILS OR LOC RWY 18, Amdt 2
Myrtle Beach, SC, Myrtle Beach Intl, ILS OR LOC RWY 36, Amdt 2
Myrtle Beach, SC, Myrtle Beach Intl, RNAV (GPS) RWY 18, Amdt 2
Myrtle Beach, SC, Myrtle Beach Intl, RNAV (GPS) RWY 36, Amdt 2
Myrtle Beach, SC, Myrtle Beach Intl, VOR/DME-A, Amdt 1
North Myrtle Beach, SC, Grand Strand, GPS RWY 5, Orig-A, CANCELLED
North Myrtle Beach, SC, Grand Strand, GPS RWY 23, Orig-A, CANCELLED
North Myrtle Beach, SC, Grand Strand, RNAV (GPS) RWY 5, Orig
North Myrtle Beach, SC, Grand Strand, RNAV (GPS) RWY 23, Orig
Summerville, SC, Summerville, RNAV (GPS) RWY 24, Orig-A
Corpus Christi, TX, Corpus Christi Intl, RNAV (GPS) Y RWY 13, Amdt
1A
Corpus Christi, TX, Corpus Christi Intl, RNAV (GPS) Y RWY 31, Amdt 3
Corpus Christi, TX, Corpus Christi Intl, RNAV (GPS) Y RWY 35, Amdt
1A
Houston, TX, David Wayne Hooks Memorial, VOR/DME RNAV RWY 35L, Amdt
4, CANCELLED
Lubbock, TX, Lubbock Preston Smith Intl, RNAV (GPS) Y RWY 17R, Amdt
2
Lubbock, TX, Lubbock Preston Smith Intl, RNAV (GPS) Y RWY 35L, Amdt
2
Lubbock, TX, Lubbock Preston Smith Intl, RNAV (RNP) Z RWY 17R, Orig
Lubbock, TX, Lubbock Preston Smith Intl, RNAV (RNP) Z RWY 35L, Orig
Temple, TX, Draughon-Miller Central Texas Rgnl, RNAV (GPS) RWY 2,
Amdt 1
Temple, TX, Draughon-Miller Central Texas Rgnl, RNAV (GPS) RWY 15,
Amdt 2
Temple, TX, Draughon-Miller Central Texas Rgnl, RNAV (GPS) RWY 33,
Amdt 2
Temple, TX, Draughon-Miller Central Texas Rgnl, Takeoff Minimum and
Obstacle DP, Amdt 4
Temple, TX, Draughon-Miller Central Texas Rgnl, VOR RWY 15, Amdt 18
Temple, TX, Draughon-Miller Central Texas Rgnl, VOR RWY 33, Amdt 4
Waco, TX, Waco Rgnl, GPS RWY 1, Orig-B, CANCELLED
Waco, TX, Waco Rgnl, GPS RWY 19, Orig-B, CANCELLED
Waco, TX, Waco Rgnl, ILS OR LOC RWY 19, Amdt 16
Waco, TX, Waco Rgnl, RADAR-1, Amdt 4
Waco, TX, Waco Rgnl, RNAV (GPS) RWY 1, Orig
Waco, TX, Waco Rgnl, RNAV (GPS) RWY 19, Orig

Waco, TX, Waco Rgnl, Takeoff Minimums and Obstacle DP, Orig
Leesburg, VA, Leesburg Executive, LOC RWY 17, Amdt 3
Leesburg, VA, Leesburg Executive, RNAV (GPS) RWY 17, Amdt 2
Leesburg, VA, Leesburg Executive, Takeoff Minimums and Obstacle DP,
Amdt 2
Leesburg, VA, Leesburg Executive, VOR OR GPS-A, Amdt 1B, CANCELLED
Spokane, WA, Spokane Intl, ILS OR LOC/DME RWY 21, ILS RWY 21 (CAT
II), ILS RWY 21 (CAT III), Amdt 22
Spokane, WA, Spokane Intl, Takeoff Minimums and Obstacle DP, Amdt 6

[FR Doc. 2010-20394 Filed 8-20-10; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910-13-P


Data Evaluation Report on Histology of the Gonads and Analysis of Hormone Levels in the Native Bullfrog ( Rana catesbiena) Collected from Agricultural Areas in Southern Iowa: Pilot Project. EPA MRID Number 458677 05 Page 1 of 20 Data Requirement: : EPA DP Barcode D288775 EPA MRID 458677 05 EPA Guideline 70 1( Special Study)

Test material: Purity: not reported Common name: Atrazine Chemical name: IUPAC CAS name 6 chloro N ethyl N'( 1 methylethyl) 1,3,5 triazine 2,4 diamine CAS No. 1912 24 9 Synonyms EPA PC Code: 80803 Primary Reviewer: Thomas M. Steeger, Ph. D., Senior Biologist Date: March 27, 2003 Environmental Fate and Effects Division, ERB 4, U. S. Environmental Protection Agency Secondary Reviewer( s): Joseph E. Tietge, M. S., Research Aquatic Biologist Date: Mid Continent Ecology Division, National Health and Environmental Effects Research Laboratory ( Duluth), U. S. Environmental Protection Agency Stephanie Irene, Ph. D., Senior Advisor Date: Environmental Fate and Effects Division, ERB 3, U. S. Environmental Protection Agency Mary J. Frankenberry, Senior Statistician Date: Environmental Fate and Effects Division, ERB 3, U. S. Environmental Protection Agency EPA PC Code 080803 Date Evaluation Completed: 06/ 01/ 2003 CITATION: Crabtree, C.; E. E. Smith; J. A. Carr. 2003. Histology of the gonads and analysis of hormone levels in the native bull frog ( Rana catesbiena) collected from agricultural areas in southern Iowa: pilot project. The Institute of Environmental and Human Health, Texas Technical University, Lubbock, Texas. Sponsor: Syngenta Crop Protection, Inc. Laboratory Identification Number ECORISK Number TTU 02. Data Evaluation Report on Histology of the Gonads and Analysis of Hormone Levels in the Native Bullfrog ( Rana catesbiena) Collected from Agricultural Areas in Southern Iowa: Pilot Project. EPA MRID Number 458677 05 Page 2 of 20 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY:

This study presents the results of Phase 1 of a three phase study where 14 pond sites in southern Iowa ( 3 reference and 11 atrazine exposed) were characterized. Experimental sites were located in corn and soybeandominated agriculture areas. Pond sizes ranged from 0.14 ha to 2.94 ha with average watershed areas ranging from 2.19 ha to 84.02 ha. Atrazine concentrations in reference ponds averaged 0.06

g/ L. Mean atrazine concentrations in corn dominated sites over the June to September ranged from 1.07 to 19.26

g/ L; atrazine was highest in corn dominated ponds in June/ July with a maximum value of 35.07

g/ L. For soybeandominated watersheds, the highest residues ranged from 3.19 to 3.85

g/ L. Similarly, maximum deisopropyl atrazine residue concentrations were highest in corn dominated areas in June/ July at 4.17

g/ L. Maximum desethyl atrazine ( DEA) residues were highest in corn dominated ponds at 16.55

g/ L in June/ July and 16.10

g/ L in August. Residues of diaminochlortriazine ( DACT) remained relatively constant during the sampling period and once again, the highest average residues ( 0.65

g/ L) were from corn dominated ponds.

Bullfrogs ( Rana catesbiena) were present at all sites in sufficient numbers for collection; however, not all life stages were collected at every site.. No significant differences were found for adult body weight or snout vent length ( SVL). Mean weight and SVL for juvenile females were significantly lower in reference sites than atrazine exposure sites. Mean SVL for juvenile males was significantly lower in reference sites than in atrazine exposure sites; however mean weight of juvenile males was not statistically different between sites. Gonadal somatic index ( GSI) was not significantly different between sites for either adults or juveniles. No gross gonadal abnormalities were observed based on visual examination ( gross morphology). The incidence of external abnormalities was less than 1% of the total frogs caught.

The number of water samples may have been insufficient to characterize the exposure potential to atrazine, particularly in reference sites. While an effort was made to characterize a limited number of herbicides, no effort appears to have been made to characterize other pesticides in general. Based on the preliminary results, none of the indices measured ( weight, length, GSI or the incidence of gross gonadal deformities ) in the bullfrog indicate that variable exposure levels to atrazine and other triazine degradates are adversely affecting this species. While the bullfrog appears to be clearly present, the relevancy of this species is questionable because there isn't much information available on the bullfrog relative to some of the indices of interest, i. e., steroid hormone levels, aromatase levels, background incidence, and types of gonadal abnormalities. Data Evaluation Report on Histology of the Gonads and Analysis of Hormone Levels in the Native Bullfrog ( Rana catesbiena) Collected from Agricultural Areas in Southern Iowa: Pilot Project. EPA MRID Number 458677 05 Page 3 of 20 I. MATERIALS AND METHODS GUIDELINE FOLLOWED: Nonguideline Study COMPLIANCE: Not conducted under full GLP; however, most practices as defined by 40 CFR Part 160, August 19, 1989 were established for this study, including but not limited to:

° Written, authorized preliminary protocol ° Written, authorized Standard Operating Procedures for all key procedures. ° Organization and Personnel were sufficient in terms of number, education, training and experience. ° Facilities were of suitable size and construction ° Equipment used was of appropriate design and adequate capacity. ° Independent QA Inspection was conducted of raw data.. ° Interim Report was written ° Raw data, documentation, records, protocols, and final report will be archived.

A. MATERIALS:

1. Test Material Atrazine Description: Not reported Lot No./ Batch No. : Not reported Purity: NA Stability of compound under test conditions: Not reported Storage conditions of test chemicals: Not reported 2. Test organism:

Species: Native bull frog ( Rana catesbiena) . Age at test initiation: La Weight at study initiation: ( mean and range) Not reported Length at study initiation: ( mean and range) Not reported Source: Field collected at Edith Angel Environmental Center, The Institute of Environmental and Human Health Texas Tech University 44351 State Hwy 13 Chariton, Iowa 50049 B. STUDY DESIGN: Data Evaluation Report on Histology of the Gonads and Analysis of Hormone Levels in the Native Bullfrog ( Rana catesbiena) Collected from Agricultural Areas in Southern Iowa: Pilot Project. EPA MRID Number 458677 05 Page 4 of 20 Objective: 1. To select sites and validate biochemical, analytical methods and sampling techniques to assess the effects of atrazine on kidney and gonad histology of bullfrogs ( Rana catesbiena) and other species collected from various field sites in southern Iowa. 2. Develop biochemical and analytical methods for determination of blood steroid hormone levels and gonadal aromatase activity. 3. Conduct histological analysis of the gonads and kidneys of collected frogs. 4. Calculate the gonadal somatic index ( GSI) of collected frogs. 5. Measure atrazine levels in the aquatic environments where frogs are collected. 6. Describe the study sites, physically, biologically, and chemically, by recording the following data for each site: shape/ area, depth, plant life, approximate watershed area, major crops in the watershed, pesticides used on the major crops, and water quality indices ( temperature, pH, dissolved oxygen, and conductivity). 7. Describe the morphology of collected frogs by recording the sex, weight, snout vent length ( SVL), and any physical abnormalities observed.

1. Experimental Conditions Sampling was conducted in mid summer ( June/ July 2002), late summer ( August 2002), Fall ( September 2002) and Spring 2003 ( no data reported as of yet) in Phase I of a three phase study. Each pond/ lake was sampled once during each sampling period. Frogs at all life stages ( tadpole through adult) were collected at each sampling.

Corn/ soybean rotational cropping patterns in 11 atrazine use areas ( K 1, R1  R4, R6, S1  S3, T1, W1) and 3 reference sites ( isolated from corn/ soybean culture) ( F1, M1, and P1) were evaluated. Reference site watersheds were either primary hardwood forest ( M1) or turf ( P1, F1). Experimental site watersheds were a combination of corn, soybean and pasture/ hay. Experimental sites R1, R2, R3, S2, T1 and W1 were planted in soybeans and treated primarily with glyphosate in 2002. Ponds K1, R4, R6, S1 and S3 were planted in corn and treated with atrazine in combination with one or more of the following herbicides: acetochlor, smetolachlor nicosulfuron, rimsulfuron or 2,4 D.

Bifenthrin was the only insecticide applied to corn. Most of the soybeans were genetically modified oganisms engineered for resistance to glyphosate. Soybeans were treated in spring with Roundup ® . A variety of herbicides were used in the watersheds of corn ( atrazine, acetochlor, s metolachlor, clomazone, ethalfluralin, nicosulfuron, rimsulfuron and 2,4 D.

At each sampling, duplicate water samples were collected from each study site; two 250 mL samples were collected from 4 sites evenly distributed around each water body ( N, S, E and W) and collected at a depth of 10 cm. Each set of four 250 mL samples were pooled into a 1 L composite. At the time of collection, Data Evaluation Report on Histology of the Gonads and Analysis of Hormone Levels in the Native Bullfrog ( Rana catesbiena) Collected from Agricultural Areas in Southern Iowa: Pilot Project. EPA MRID Number 458677 05 Page 5 of 20 temperature, DO, pH and conductivity were measured. One sediment sample was collected from each site during late ummer sampling.

Samples were analyzed for atrazine and its metabolites, simizine and metolochlor.

Frogs were collected by dip net for one hour at night. All frogs that could be collected within the 1 hour period were held in buckets of pond water until the sampling period ended. All frogs with physical abnormalities were immediately selected for analysis and the remainder were randomly selected from the pooled sample until a sample size of 10 ( 15 during early fall) was achieved. Tadpoles were collected using dip nets just prior to or concurrent with frog sampling until a total of 10 tadpoles were collected. Remaining frogs were released back into the pond.

Blood samples were collected from adults by cardiac puncture. Species, sex, weight and SVL for each necropsied specimen was recorded ( apparently after each of the animals had been bled and necropsied). During early fall sampling, right gonad was extracted from 5 of the 15 collected animals, frozen in liquid nitrogen for use in 3H2O release aromatase assay. The remainder of the carcass was fixed in Bouin's. A random sample of 340 male and female frogs ( 73% of all the frogs sampled in 2002) were examined visually.

II. RESULTS and DISCUSSION: [ All results discussed in this section and the next are those reported by the study authors. Although supplemental data are typically used in a qualitative manner only, EFED verified spreadsheet data and ran basic statistical analyses on the major study parameters. See attached appendix. If results appeared to differ in any substantive way, the difference was reported in the text below.]

Pond sizes ranged from 0.14 ha to 2.94 ha. The average watershed areas ranged from 2.19 ha to 84.02 ha. Dissolved oxygen in terms of percent saturation was surprisingly low during the late summer and fall samplings dropping as low as 1.9% saturation. In pond T1, pH is reported to have dropped to 1.31 and is likely a typo.

Although atrazine concentrations in corn dominated sites over the June to September sampling period averaged 5.52

g/ L ( Table 1), the means from each of the ponds ranged from 1.07 to 19.26

g/ L. Atrazine was highest in corn dominated ponds in June/ July with the maximum value of 35.07

g/ L; experimental pond R6 ( corn) exhibited the highest atrazine levels ranging from 5.7 to 35.07

g/ L. For soybean dominated watersheds, pond W1 had the highest residues ranging from 3.19 to 3.85

g/ L. Similarly, deisopropyl atrazine concentrations were highest in corn dominated areas and averaged 0.89

g/ L; however maximum residues were recorded in June/ July at 4.17

g/ L. Desethyl atrazine ( DEA) residues were highest in corn dominated ponds; however residues from June through August were relatively consistent. Maximum residues for DEA were at 16.55

g/ L in June/ July and 16.10

g/ L in August. Residues of diaminochlortriazine ( DACT) remained relatively constant during the sampling period and once again, the highest average residues ( 0.65

g/ L) were from corndominated ponds. The maximum residue detected ( 2.33

g/ L) occurred twice, once in June/ July and again in September.

Metolachlor residues averaged between 0.05 and 0.06

g/ L across all sample sites while simazine residues averaged 0.05

g/ L. The detection limits for both metolachlor and simazine are 0.1

g/ L and thus residues were at or below detection limits. Data Evaluation Report on Histology of the Gonads and Analysis of Hormone Levels in the Native Bullfrog ( Rana catesbiena) Collected from Agricultural Areas in Southern Iowa: Pilot Project. EPA MRID Number 458677 05 Page 6 of 20 Table 1. Mean atrazine, diaminochlorotriazine ( DACT), deisopropyl atrazine, and desethyl atrazine residues in pond water collected at refernecea, corn dominatedb and soybean dominatedc sites.

Chemical Residues Reference

g/ L Corn

g/ L Soybean

g/ L Atrazine 0.06 5.52 1.05 Diaminochlorotriazine 0.10 0.65 0.24 Deisopropyl atrazine 0.05 0.89 0.21 Desethyl atrazine 0.05 3.18 0.65 a reference site include ponds M1, P1 and F1 b corn dominated sites include ponds R4, R6, K1, S1 and S3 c soybean dominated sites include ponds R1, R2, R3, S2, T1 and W1 Frogs without tails but less than 70 g were classified as juveniles, while frogs without tails but weighing  70 g were classified as adults. More females than males were collected in sampling period 1 ( 50% vs 35%) and in period 2 ( 54% vs 40%); however, in sampling period 3, the percentage of males and females was roughly similar 50% vs 49%). Overall, for the three ponds combined, females outnumbered males ( 51% vs 43%) and juveniles outnumbered the adults ( 52% vs 44%). Species other than bullfrogs represented 6% of all collected frogs.

T test comparisons between reference sites and experimental sites for adult males and adult females resulted in no significant difference for either weight or length ( Table 2). In general there was a trend for male and female adults to weigh more at reference sites. However, mean weight and SVL for juvenile females was significantly lower in reference sites than experimental sites. There were no differences in the gonadosomatic index for males ( weight of the right gonad ÷ frog's weight) or females collected at reference versus experimental sites ( Table 3).

No gross morphological abnormalities were observed ( n = 340) in either male or female gonads collected across reference and experimental sites.

Table 4 summarizes the total number of bullfrogs caught and sampled in reference and experimental sites and the sexes of those animals over the three sampling periods. This information was taken from Tables 10 through 12 of the report. Based on these data, the percentage of males in reference samples ranged from 11 to 56% over the three sampling periods, while the percentage of males in experimental site samples ranged from 41 to 49%. In reference sites, the percentage of frogs where the sex could not be determined based on gross morphology ranged from 0 to 22% while in experimental sites, the percentage ranged form 1.4% to 5.9%. Data Evaluation Report on Histology of the Gonads and Analysis of Hormone Levels in the Native Bullfrog ( Rana catesbiena) Collected from Agricultural Areas in Southern Iowa: Pilot Project. EPA MRID Number 458677 05 Page 7 of 20 Table 2. Necropsied carcass weight and snout to vent length ( SVL) for male and female, adult and juvenile bullfrogs collected from reference and experimental sites.

Site Type Sex Stage Weight SVL N Mean SD N Mean SD Reference male adult 14 147.33 47.79 14 119.1 11.9 female 16 195.61 104.58 15 126.6 20.7 male juvenile 22 18.65 19.03 22 55.5 18.8 female 32 15.63 13.13 32 53.7 15.5 Experimental male adult 78 134.40 57.74 78 114.9 15.9 female 68 160.23 98.84 65 117.7 17.9 male juvenile 78 26.56 17.58 78 65.6 15.3 female 103 26.99 16.75 103 65.6 14.5 Table 3. Gonadosomatic index for bullfrogs collected during sampling period 3 Site Type Sex Stage N Mean Standard Deviation Reference male female Adult 6 3 0.07% 1.01% 0.01% 0.52%

male female Juvenile 2 3 0.05% 0.67% 0.02% 0.16%

Experimental male female Adult 15 15 0.06% 0.93% 0.02% 0.74%

male female Juvenile 10 15 0.03% 0.60% 0.02% 0.29% Data Evaluation Report on Histology of the Gonads and Analysis of Hormone Levels in the Native Bullfrog ( Rana catesbiena) Collected from Agricultural Areas in Southern Iowa: Pilot Project. EPA MRID Number 458677 05 Page 8 of 20 Table 4. Total number of bullfrogs caught and sampled and their respective sex based on gross morphology by collection period.

Sampling Period Treatment Number Caught Number Sampled Males Females Unknown June  July Reference 18 18 2 12 4 Experimental 394 99 41 47 11 August Reference 42 27 9 16 2 Experimental 447 101 44 51 6 September Reference 87 45 25 20 0 Experimental 286 146* 71 75 2 * Pond R3 and W1 reported as 14 frogs captured but in both 15 were reported sexed.

REVIEWER'S COMMENTS:

This study represents a basic survey of a proposed study area. The limited number of water samples may not have provided sufficient characterization of the exposure potential to atrazine, particularly in reference sites. While an effort was made to characterize a limited number of herbicides, other pesticides apparently were not characterized. While the bullfrog appears to be clearly present, the relevancy of this species is questionable because no other studies looking at gonadal abnormalities are available on this species.

Weighing and measuring animals after cardiac puncture may influence the accuracy of these numbers. It is unclear why no mention is made of the number of adult animals where the sex could not be determined; in reference ponds the percentage was as high as 22%. Because the histology data have not been compiled, it is premature to conclude anything about the incidence of intersex in the bullfrog. Initial results, though, suggest that the field collected bullfrog is not sensitive to atrazine.

CONCLUSIONS:

This is an interim report; however, based on the preliminary results, none of the indices measured ( weight, length, GSI or the incidence of gross gonadal deformities ) in the bullfrog indicate that variable exposure levels to atrazine and other triazine degradates are adversely affecting this species. While the bullfrog appears to be clearly present, the relevancy of this species is questionable because there isn't much information available on the bullfrog relative to some of the indices of interest, i. e., steroid hormone levels, aromatase levels, background incidence, and types of gonadal abnormalities. Additional information is needed from the final report before a definitive conclusion can be reached for this study. Data Evaluation Report on Histology of the Gonads and Analysis of Hormone Levels in the Native Bullfrog ( Rana catesbiena) Collected from Agricultural Areas in Southern Iowa: Pilot Project. EPA MRID Number 458677 05 Page 9 of 20 AVERAGE WEIGHT OF BULLFROGS BY TYPE ( REFERENCE VS EXPERIMENTAL), SEX ( MALE VS FEMALE) AND STAGE ( ADULT VS JUVENILE)

Obs TYPE SEX STAGE _ TYPE_ _ FREQ_ WEIGHT STD CV 1 EXP F A 0 171 79.9756 91.079 113.884 2 EXP M A 0 156 80.4827 68.817 85.505 3 EXP UNK A 0 12 18.5758 15.421 83.015 4 REF F A 0 48 75.6256 104.667 138.402 5 REF M A 0 36 68.6925 71.508 104.099 6 REF UNK A 0 3 38.8833 57.196 147.097 AVERAGE LENGTH OF BULLFROGS BY TYPE ( REFERENCE VS EXPERIMENTAL), SEX ( MALE VS FEMALE) AND STAGE ( ADULT VS JUVENILE)

Obs TYPE SEX STAGE _ TYPE_ _ FREQ_ LENGTH STD CV 1 EXP F A 0 171 85.7607 30.0012 34.9824 2 EXP M A 0 156 90.2558 29.2040 32.3569 3 EXP UNK A 0 12 57.2833 13.8312 24.1453 4 REF F A 0 48 76.9404 38.3845 49.8886 5 REF M A 0 36 80.2306 35.3826 44.1011 6 REF UNK A 0 3 63.6333 41.8914 65.8326 Data Evaluation Report on Histology of the Gonads and Analysis of Hormone Levels in the Native Bullfrog ( Rana catesbiena) Collected from Agricultural Areas in Southern Iowa: Pilot Project. EPA MRID Number 458677 05 Page 10 of 20 NONPARAMETRIC COMPARISON OF BULLFROG WEIGHT BETWEEN REFERENCE AND EXPERIMENTAL SITES 1418  SEX= F STAGE= A

The NPAR1WAY Procedure Wilcoxon Scores ( Rank Sums) for Variable WEIGHT Classified by Variable TYPE Sum of Expected Std Dev Mean TYPE N Scores Under H0 Under H0 Score ââââââââââââââââââââââââââââââââââââââââââââââââââââââââââââââââââââ EXP 171 19714.50 18810.0 387.917074 115.289474 REF 48 4375.50 5280.0 387.917074 91.156250 Average scores were used for ties.

Wilcoxon Two Sample Test Statistic 4375.5000 Normal Approximation Z  2.3304 One Sided Pr < Z 0.0099 Two Sided Pr > | Z| 0.0198 t Approximation One Sided Pr < Z 0.0103 Two Sided Pr > | Z| 0.0207 Z includes a continuity correction of 0.5.

Kruskal Wallis Test Chi Square 5.4367 DF 1 Pr > Chi Square 0.0197 Median Scores ( Number of Points Above Median) for Variable WEIGHT Classified by Variable TYPE Sum of Expected Std Dev Mean TYPE N Scores Under H0 Under H0 Score ââââââââââââââââââââââââââââââââââââââââââââââââââââââââââââââââââââ EXP 171 90.0 85.109589 3.068004 0.526316 REF 48 19.0 23.890411 3.068004 0.395833 Average scores were used for ties.

Median Two Sample Test Statistic 19.0000 Z  1.5940 One Sided Pr < Z 0.0555 Two Sided Pr > | Z| 0.1109 Median One Way Analysis Chi Square 2.5408 DF 1 Pr > Chi Square 0.1109 Data Evaluation Report on Histology of the Gonads and Analysis of Hormone Levels in the Native Bullfrog ( Rana catesbiena) Collected from Agricultural Areas in Southern Iowa: Pilot Project. EPA MRID Number 458677 05 Page 11 of 20 NONPARAMETRIC COMPARISON OF BULLFROG WEIGHT BETWEEN REFERENCE AND EXPERIMENTAL SITES 1420  SEX= M STAGE= A

The NPAR1WAY Procedure Wilcoxon Scores ( Rank Sums) for Variable WEIGHT Classified by Variable TYPE Sum of Expected Std Dev Mean TYPE N Scores Under H0 Under H0 Score ââââââââââââââââââââââââââââââââââââââââââââââââââââââââââââââââââââ EXP 156 15586.0 15054.0 300.539133 99.910256 REF 36 2942.0 3474.0 300.539133 81.722222 Average scores were used for ties.

Wilcoxon Two Sample Test Statistic 2942.0000 Normal Approximation Z  1.7685 One Sided Pr < Z 0.0385 Two Sided Pr > | Z| 0.0770 t Approximation One Sided Pr < Z 0.0393 Two Sided Pr > | Z| 0.0786 Z includes a continuity correction of 0.5.

Kruskal Wallis Test Chi Square 3.1334 DF 1 Pr > Chi Square 0.0767 Median Scores ( Number of Points Above Median) for Variable WEIGHT Classified by Variable TYPE Sum of Expected Std Dev Mean TYPE N Scores Under H0 Under H0 Score ââââââââââââââââââââââââââââââââââââââââââââââââââââââââââââââââââââ EXP 156 82.0 78.0 2.711233 0.525641 REF 36 14.0 18.0 2.711233 0.388889 Average scores were used for ties.

Median Two Sample Test Statistic 14.0000 Z  1.4753 One Sided Pr < Z 0.0701 Two Sided Pr > | Z| 0.1401 Median One Way Analysis Chi Square 2.1766 DF 1 Pr > Chi Square 0.1401 Data Evaluation Report on Histology of the Gonads and Analysis of Hormone Levels in the Native Bullfrog ( Rana catesbiena) Collected from Agricultural Areas in Southern Iowa: Pilot Project. EPA MRID Number 458677 05 Page 12 of 20 NONPARAMETRIC COMPARISON OF BULLFROG WEIGHT BETWEEN REFERENCE AND EXPERIMENTAL SITES 1422  SEX= UNK STAGE= A

The NPAR1WAY Procedure Wilcoxon Scores ( Rank Sums) for Variable WEIGHT Classified by Variable TYPE Sum of Expected Std Dev Mean TYPE N Scores Under H0 Under H0 Score ââââââââââââââââââââââââââââââââââââââââââââââââââââââââââââââââââââ EXP 12 102.0 96.0 6.922015 8.50 REF 3 18.0 24.0 6.922015 6.00 Average scores were used for ties.

Wilcoxon Two Sample Test Statistic 18.0000 Normal Approximation Z  0.7946 One Sided Pr < Z 0.2134 Two Sided Pr > | Z| 0.4269 t Approximation One Sided Pr < Z 0.2201 Two Sided Pr > | Z| 0.4401 Z includes a continuity correction of 0.5.

Kruskal Wallis Test Chi Square 0.7513 DF 1 Pr > Chi Square 0.3861 Median Scores ( Number of Points Above Median) for Variable WEIGHT Classified by Variable TYPE Sum of Expected Std Dev Mean TYPE N Scores Under H0 Under H0 Score ââââââââââââââââââââââââââââââââââââââââââââââââââââââââââââââââââââ EXP 12 6.0 5.60 0.80 0.500000 REF 3 1.0 1.40 0.80 0.333333 Average scores were used for ties.

Median Two Sample Test Statistic 1.0000 Z  0.5000 One Sided Pr < Z 0.3085 Two Sided Pr > | Z| 0.6171 Median One Way Analysis Chi Square 0.2500 DF 1 Pr > Chi Square 0.6171 Data Evaluation Report on Histology of the Gonads and Analysis of Hormone Levels in the Native Bullfrog ( Rana catesbiena) Collected from Agricultural Areas in Southern Iowa: Pilot Project. EPA MRID Number 458677 05 Page 13 of 20 NONPARAMETRIC COMPARISON OF BULLFROG LENGTH BETWEEN REFERENCE AND EXPERIMENTAL SITES 1424  SEX= F STAGE= A

The NPAR1WAY Procedure Wilcoxon Scores ( Rank Sums) for Variable SVL Classified by Variable TYPE Sum of Expected Std Dev Mean TYPE N Scores Under H0 Under H0 Score ââââââââââââââââââââââââââââââââââââââââââââââââââââââââââââââââââââ EXP 168 18998.0 18144.0 376.994577 113.083333 REF 47 4222.0 5076.0 376.994577 89.829787 Average scores were used for ties.

Wilcoxon Two Sample Test Statistic 4222.0000 Normal Approximation Z  2.2640 One Sided Pr < Z 0.0118 Two Sided Pr > | Z| 0.0236 t Approximation One Sided Pr < Z 0.0123 Two Sided Pr > | Z| 0.0246 Z includes a continuity correction of 0.5.

Kruskal Wallis Test Chi Square 5.1315 DF 1 Pr > Chi Square 0.0235 Median Scores ( Number of Points Above Median) for Variable SVL Classified by Variable TYPE Sum of Expected Std Dev Mean TYPE N Scores Under H0 Under H0 Score ââââââââââââââââââââââââââââââââââââââââââââââââââââââââââââââââââââ EXP 168 89.0 83.609302 3.037120 0.529762 REF 47 18.0 23.390698 3.037120 0.382979 Average scores were used for ties.

Median Two Sample Test Statistic 18.0000 Z  1.7749 One Sided Pr < Z 0.0380 Two Sided Pr > | Z| 0.0759 Median One Way Analysis Chi Square 3.1504 DF 1 Pr > Chi Square 0.0759 Data Evaluation Report on Histology of the Gonads and Analysis of Hormone Levels in the Native Bullfrog ( Rana catesbiena) Collected from Agricultural Areas in Southern Iowa: Pilot Project. EPA MRID Number 458677 05 Page 14 of 20 NONPARAMETRIC COMPARISON OF BULLFROG LENGTH BETWEEN REFERENCE AND EXPERIMENTAL SITES 1426  SEX= M STAGE= A

The NPAR1WAY Procedure Wilcoxon Scores ( Rank Sums) for Variable SVL Classified by Variable TYPE Sum of Expected Std Dev Mean TYPE N Scores Under H0 Under H0 Score ââââââââââââââââââââââââââââââââââââââââââââââââââââââââââââââââââââ EXP 156 15553.50 15054.0 300.536458 99.701923 REF 36 2974.50 3474.0 300.536458 82.625000 Average scores were used for ties.

Wilcoxon Two Sample Test Statistic 2974.5000 Normal Approximation Z  1.6604 One Sided Pr < Z 0.0484 Two Sided Pr > | Z| 0.0968 t Approximation One Sided Pr < Z 0.0492 Two Sided Pr > | Z| 0.0985 Z includes a continuity correction of 0.5.

Kruskal Wallis Test Chi Square 2.7623 DF 1 Pr > Chi Square 0.0965 Median Scores ( Number of Points Above Median) for Variable SVL Classified by Variable TYPE Sum of Expected Std Dev Mean TYPE N Scores Under H0 Under H0 Score ââââââââââââââââââââââââââââââââââââââââââââââââââââââââââââââââââââ EXP 156 81.0 78.0 2.711233 0.519231 REF 36 15.0 18.0 2.711233 0.416667 Average scores were used for ties.

Median Two Sample Test Statistic 15.0000 Z  1.1065 One Sided Pr < Z 0.1343 Two Sided Pr > | Z| 0.2685 Median One Way Analysis Chi Square 1.2244 DF 1 Pr > Chi Square 0.2685 Data Evaluation Report on Histology of the Gonads and Analysis of Hormone Levels in the Native Bullfrog ( Rana catesbiena) Collected from Agricultural Areas in Southern Iowa: Pilot Project. EPA MRID Number 458677 05 Page 15 of 20 NONPARAMETRIC COMPARISON OF BULLFROG LENGTH BETWEEN REFERENCE AND EXPERIMENTAL SITES 1428  SEX= UNK STAGE= A

The NPAR1WAY Procedure Wilcoxon Scores ( Rank Sums) for Variable SVL Classified by Variable TYPE Sum of Expected Std Dev Mean TYPE N Scores Under H0 Under H0 Score ââââââââââââââââââââââââââââââââââââââââââââââââââââââââââââââââââââ EXP 12 102.0 96.0 6.928203 8.50 REF 3 18.0 24.0 6.928203 6.00 Wilcoxon Two Sample Test Statistic 18.0000 Normal Approximation Z  0.7939 One Sided Pr < Z 0.2136 Two Sided Pr > | Z| 0.4273 t Approximation One Sided Pr < Z 0.2203 Two Sided Pr > | Z| 0.4405 Z includes a continuity correction of 0.5.

Kruskal Wallis Test Chi Square 0.7500 DF 1 Pr > Chi Square 0.3865 Median Scores ( Number of Points Above Median) for Variable SVL Classified by Variable TYPE Sum of Expected Std Dev Mean TYPE N Scores Under H0 Under H0 Score ââââââââââââââââââââââââââââââââââââââââââââââââââââââââââââââââââââ EXP 12 6.0 5.60 0.80 0.500000 REF 3 1.0 1.40 0.80 0.333333 Median Two Sample Test Statistic 1.0000 Z  0.5000 One Sided Pr < Z 0.3085 Two Sided Pr > | Z| 0.6171 Median One Way Analysis Chi Square 0.2500 DF 1 Pr > Chi Square 0.6171 Data Evaluation Report on Histology of the Gonads and Analysis of Hormone Levels in the Native Bullfrog ( Rana catesbiena) Collected from Agricultural Areas in Southern Iowa: Pilot Project. EPA MRID Number 458677 05 Page 16 of 20 MEAN GONADOSOMATIC INDEX BY STUDY TYPE ( REFERENCE VS EXPERIMENTAL), SEX ( MALE VS FEMALE), A STAGE ( ADULT VS JUVENILE)

Obs TYPE SEX STAGE _ TYPE_ _ FREQ_ GSI STD CV 1 EXP F A 0 15 0.92800 0.74356 80.1245 2 EXP F J 0 15 0.60133 0.29384 48.8645 3 EXP M A 0 15 0.06467 0.01552 24.0041 4 EXP M J 0 10 0.03500 0.01780 50.8432 5 REF F A 0 3 1.01000 0.52374 51.8551 6 REF F J 0 3 0.66667 0.15822 23.7329 7 REF M A 0 6 0.06833 0.01602 23.4451 8 REF M J 0 2 0.05000 0.02828 56.5685 Data Evaluation Report on Histology of the Gonads and Analysis of Hormone Levels in the Native Bullfrog ( Rana catesbiena) Collected from Agricultural Areas in Southern Iowa: Pilot Project. EPA MRID Number 458677 05 Page 17 of 20 NONPARAMETRIC COMPARISON OF GSI BETWEEN REFERENCE AND EXPERIMENTAL SITES 1431  SEX= F STAGE= A

The NPAR1WAY Procedure Wilcoxon Scores ( Rank Sums) for Variable GSI Classified by Variable TYPE Sum of Expected Std Dev Mean TYPE N Scores Under H0 Under H0 Score ââââââââââââââââââââââââââââââââââââââââââââââââââââââââââââââââââââ EXP 15 138.0 142.50 8.432256 9.20 REF 3 33.0 28.50 8.432256 11.00 Average scores were used for ties.

Wilcoxon Two Sample Test Statistic 33.0000 Normal Approximation Z 0.4744 One Sided Pr > Z 0.3176 Two Sided Pr > | Z| 0.6352 t Approximation One Sided Pr > Z 0.3206 Two Sided Pr > | Z| 0.6413 Z includes a continuity correction of 0.5.

Kruskal Wallis Test Chi Square 0.2848 DF 1 Pr > Chi Square 0.5936 Median Scores ( Number of Points Above Median) for Variable GSI Classified by Variable TYPE Sum of Expected Std Dev Mean TYPE N Scores Under H0 Under H0 Score ââââââââââââââââââââââââââââââââââââââââââââââââââââââââââââââââââââ EXP 15 7.0 7.50 0.813489 0.466667 REF 3 2.0 1.50 0.813489 0.666667 Average scores were used for ties.

Median Two Sample Test Statistic 2.0000 Z 0.6146 One Sided Pr > Z 0.2694 Two Sided Pr > | Z| 0.5388 Median One Way Analysis Chi Square 0.3778 DF 1 Pr > Chi Square 0.5388 Data Evaluation Report on Histology of the Gonads and Analysis of Hormone Levels in the Native Bullfrog ( Rana catesbiena) Collected from Agricultural Areas in Southern Iowa: Pilot Project. EPA MRID Number 458677 05 Page 18 of 20 NONPARAMETRIC COMPARISON OF GSI BETWEEN REFERENCE AND EXPERIMENTAL SITES 1433  SEX= F STAGE= J

The NPAR1WAY Procedure Wilcoxon Scores ( Rank Sums) for Variable GSI Classified by Variable TYPE Sum of Expected Std Dev Mean TYPE N Scores Under H0 Under H0 Score ââââââââââââââââââââââââââââââââââââââââââââââââââââââââââââââââââââ EXP 15 135.50 142.50 8.436615 9.033333 REF 3 35.50 28.50 8.436615 11.833333 Average scores were used for ties.

Wilcoxon Two Sample Test Statistic 35.5000 Normal Approximation Z 0.7705 One Sided Pr > Z 0.2205 Two Sided Pr > | Z| 0.4410 t Approximation One Sided Pr > Z 0.2258 Two Sided Pr > | Z| 0.4516 Z includes a continuity correction of 0.5.

Kruskal Wallis Test Chi Square 0.6884 DF 1 Pr > Chi Square 0.4067 Median Scores ( Number of Points Above Median) for Variable GSI Classified by Variable TYPE Sum of Expected Std Dev Mean TYPE N Scores Under H0 Under H0 Score ââââââââââââââââââââââââââââââââââââââââââââââââââââââââââââââââââââ EXP 15 7.0 7.50 0.813489 0.466667 REF 3 2.0 1.50 0.813489 0.666667 Average scores were used for ties.

Median Two Sample Test Statistic 2.0000 Z 0.6146 One Sided Pr > Z 0.2694 Two Sided Pr > | Z| 0.5388 Median One Way Analysis Chi Square 0.3778 DF 1 Pr > Chi Square 0.5388 Data Evaluation Report on Histology of the Gonads and Analysis of Hormone Levels in the Native Bullfrog ( Rana catesbiena) Collected from Agricultural Areas in Southern Iowa: Pilot Project. EPA MRID Number 458677 05 Page 19 of 20 NONPARAMETRIC COMPARISON OF GSI BETWEEN REFERENCE AND EXPERIMENTAL SITES 1435  SEX= M STAGE= A

The NPAR1WAY Procedure Wilcoxon Scores ( Rank Sums) for Variable GSI Classified by Variable TYPE Sum of Expected Std Dev Mean TYPE N Scores Under H0 Under H0 Score ââââââââââââââââââââââââââââââââââââââââââââââââââââââââââââââââââââ EXP 15 155.50 165.0 12.575486 10.366667 REF 6 75.50 66.0 12.575486 12.583333 Average scores were used for ties.

Wilcoxon Two Sample Test Statistic 75.5000 Normal Approximation Z 0.7157 One Sided Pr > Z 0.2371 Two Sided Pr > | Z| 0.4742 t Approximation One Sided Pr > Z 0.2412 Two Sided Pr > | Z| 0.4825 Z includes a continuity correction of 0.5.

Kruskal Wallis Test Chi Square 0.5707 DF 1 Pr > Chi Square 0.4500 Median Scores ( Number of Points Above Median) for Variable GSI Classified by Variable TYPE Sum of Expected Std Dev Mean TYPE N Scores Under H0 Under H0 Score ââââââââââââââââââââââââââââââââââââââââââââââââââââââââââââââââââââ EXP 15 5.666667 7.142857 0.971534 0.377778 REF 6 4.333333 2.857143 0.971534 0.722222 Average scores were used for ties.

Median Two Sample Test Statistic 4.3333 Z 1.5194 One Sided Pr > Z 0.0643 Two Sided Pr > | Z| 0.1287 Median One Way Analysis Chi Square 2.3087 DF 1 Pr > Chi Square 0.1287 Data Evaluation Report on Histology of the Gonads and Analysis of Hormone Levels in the Native Bullfrog ( Rana catesbiena) Collected from Agricultural Areas in Southern Iowa: Pilot Project. EPA MRID Number 458677 05 Page 20 of 20 NONPARAMETRIC COMPARISON OF GSI BETWEEN REFERENCE AND EXPERIMENTAL SITES 1437  SEX= M STAGE= J

The NPAR1WAY Procedure Wilcoxon Scores ( Rank Sums) for Variable GSI Classified by Variable TYPE Sum of Expected Std Dev Mean TYPE N Scores Under H0 Under H0 Score ââââââââââââââââââââââââââââââââââââââââââââââââââââââââââââââââââââ EXP 10 60.50 65.0 4.522670 6.050 REF 2 17.50 13.0 4.522670 8.750 Average scores were used for ties.

Wilcoxon Two Sample Test Statistic 17.5000 Normal Approximation Z 0.8844 One Sided Pr > Z 0.1882 Two Sided Pr > | Z| 0.3765 t Approximation One Sided Pr > Z 0.1977 Two Sided Pr > | Z| 0.3954 Z includes a continuity correction of 0.5.

Kruskal Wallis Test Chi Square 0.9900 DF 1 Pr > Chi Square 0.3197 Median Scores ( Number of Points Above Median) for Variable GSI Classified by Variable TYPE Sum of Expected Std Dev Mean TYPE N Scores Under H0 Under H0 Score ââââââââââââââââââââââââââââââââââââââââââââââââââââââââââââââââââââ EXP 10 4.666667 5.0 0.594588 0.466667 REF 2 1.333333 1.0 0.594588 0.666667 Average scores were used for ties.

Median Two Sample Test Statistic 1.3333 Z 0.5606 One Sided Pr > Z 0.2875 Two Sided Pr > | Z| 0.5751 Median One Way Analysis Chi Square 0.3143 DF 1 Pr > Chi Square 0.5751