[Federal Register: November 22, 2005 (Volume 70, Number 224)]
[Notices]
[Page 70607]
[DOCID:fr22no05-65]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission

[Docket No. RP96-359-029]

Transcontinental Gas Pipe Line Corporation; Notice of Compliance
Filing

November 15, 2005.
    Take notice that, on November 7, 2005, Transcontinental Gas Pipe
Line Corporation (Transco) submitted a compliance filing pursuant to
the Commission's Order on Negotiated Rate Agreements, issued on October
26, 2005 in Docket No. RP96-359-028.
    Transco states that copies of the filing were served on parties on
the official service list in the above-captioned proceeding.
    Any person desiring to protest this filing must file in accordance
with Rule 211 of the Commission's Rules of Practice and Procedure (18
CFR 385.211). Protests to this filing will be considered by the
Commission in determining the appropriate action to be taken, but will
not serve to make protestants parties to the proceeding. Such protests
must be filed in accordance with the provisions of Section 154.210 of
the Commission's regulations (18 CFR 154.210). Anyone filing a protest
must serve a copy of that document on all the parties to the
proceeding.
    The Commission encourages electronic submission of protests in lieu
of paper using the ``eFiling'' link at http://www.ferc.gov. Persons

unable to file electronically should submit an original and 14 copies
of the protest to the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission, 888 First
Street, NE., Washington, DC 20426.
    This filing is accessible on-line at http://www.ferc.gov, using the

``eLibrary'' link and is available for review in the Commission's
Public Reference Room in Washington, DC. There is an ``eSubscription''
link on the Web site that enables subscribers to receive e-mail
notification when a document is added to a subscribed docket(s). For
assistance with any FERC Online service, please e-mail
<EMAIL_ADDRESS>or call<PHONE_NUMBER> (toll free). For

TTY, call<PHONE_NUMBER>.

Magalie R. Salas,
Secretary.
 [FR Doc. E5-6427 Filed 11-21-05; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 6717-01-P


[Federal Register Volume 82, Number 67 (Monday, April 10, 2017)]
[Notices]
[Pages 17325-17326]
[FR Doc No: 2017-07013]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION

Federal Railroad Administration

[Docket Number FRA-2005-23489]

Petition for Waiver of Compliance

    In accordance with part 211 of Title 49 Code of Federal Regulations
(CFR), this document provides the public notice that by a document
dated January 24, 2017, Gettysburg & Northern Railroad Company (GNRR)
has petitioned the Federal Railroad Administration (FRA) for a waiver
of compliance from certain provisions of the Federal railroad safety
regulations contained at 49 CFR 223.11, Requirements for existing
locomotives. FRA assigned the petition Docket Number 2005-23489.
    GNRR is seeking this waiver of compliance due to noncompliant
glazing on two locomotives, numbered PREX 401 and PREX 402. GNRR is
located in Gettysburg, PA, and operates on approximately 25.5 miles of
track at speeds not exceeding 15 mph. The surrounding area is
predominantly rural and these locomotives are used primarily in
passenger service during the summer excursion season. Occasionally,
they are also used as backup power units in freight service.
    A copy of the petition, as well as any written communications
concerning the petition, is available for review online at
www.regulations.gov and in person at the U.S. Department of
Transportation's (DOT) Docket Operations Facility, 1200 New Jersey
Avenue SE., W12-140, Washington, DC 20590. The Docket Operations
Facility is open from 9 a.m. to 5 p.m., Monday through Friday, except
Federal Holidays.
    Interested parties are invited to participate in these proceedings
by submitting written views, data, or comments. FRA does not anticipate
scheduling a public hearing in connection with these proceedings since
the facts do not appear to warrant a hearing. If any interested parties
desire an opportunity for oral comment and a public hearing, they
should notify FRA, in writing, before the end of the comment period and
specify the basis for their request.
    All communications concerning these proceedings should identify the
appropriate docket number and may be submitted by any of the following
methods:
     Web site: http://www.regulations.gov. Follow the online
instructions for submitting comments.
     Fax:<PHONE_NUMBER>.
     Mail: Docket Operations Facility, U.S. Department of
Transportation, 1200 New Jersey Avenue SE., W12-140, Washington, DC
20590.
     Hand Delivery: 1200 New Jersey Avenue SE., Room W12-140,
Washington, DC 20590, between 9 a.m. and 5 p.m., Monday through Friday,
except Federal Holidays.
    Communications received by May 25, 2017 will be considered by FRA
before final action is taken. Comments received

after that date will be considered as far as practicable.
    Anyone is able to search the electronic form of any written
communications and comments received into any of our dockets by the
name of the individual submitting the comment (or signing the document,
if submitted on behalf of an association, business, labor union, etc.).
In accordance with 5 U.S.C. 553(c), DOT solicits comments from the
public to better inform its processes. DOT posts these comments,
without edit, including any personal information the commenter
provides, to www.regulations.gov, as described in the system of records
notice (DOT/ALL-14 FDMS), which can be reviewed at https://www.transportation.gov/privacy. See also https://www.regulations.gov/privacyNotice for the privacy notice of regulations.gov.

Robert C. Lauby,
Associate Administrator for Railroad Safety Chief Safety Officer.
[FR Doc. 2017-07013 Filed 4-7-17; 8:45 am]
 BILLING CODE 4910-06-P


INFORMATION COLLECTION REQUEST Regulations for a Voluntary Emissions Standards Program Applicable to Manufacturers of Light Duty Vehicles and Trucks Beginning in Model Year 1997 National LEV Program Reporting and Recordkeeping EPA # 1761.03 ( OMB No. 2060  0345)

March 2001 Certification & Compliance Division Office of Transportation and Air Quality Office of Air and Radiation U. S. Environmental Protection Agency 2 SUPPORTING STATEMENT 1. IDENTIFICATION OF THE INFORMATION COLLECTION 1( a) TITLE Regulations for a Voluntary Emissions Standards Program Applicable to Manufacturers of Light Duty Vehicles and Trucks Beginning in Model Year 1997 1( b) SHORT CHARACTERIZATION ( ABSTRACT)

OMB has listed this ICR as, Regulations for a Voluntary Emissions Standards Program Applicable to Manufacturers of Light Duty Vehicles and Trucks Beginning in Model Year 1977, l997 is the correct model year.

This information collection involves the periodic reporting and recordkeeping by manufacturers participating in the voluntary emissions standards program applicable to manufacturers of light duty vehicles and light duty trucks beginning in model year 1997. The information is to be submitted to the Certification and Compliance Division ( CCD) of the Office of Transportation and Air Quality, Office of Air and Radiation.

Manufacturers would submit information regarding the annual sales, calculation, generation, and usage of emission credits in an annual report. In addition, upon transferring credits to another manufacturer, the manufacturer would submit this information along with their annual report. This information will be submitted to EPA in annual reports and will involve 18 respondents at a total annual cost of $ 580,212.

The Environmental Protection Agency ( EPA) currently has in place an Information Collection Request ( ICR) and clearance for information collection and recordkeeping requirements related to annual sales reporting for light duty vehicles and trucks. This ICR reflects additional requirements( beyond the annual sales reporting requirement) to collate the annual sales data and learn and implement the credit calculation program. The estimated annual burden attributed to the collection addressed in this ICR is 241 hours for each of the 18 potential respondents, for a total of 4,338 burden hours. In the future, this ICR ( Regulations for a Voluntary Emissions Standards Program Applicable to Manufacturers of Light Duty Vehicles and Trucks Beginning in Model Year 1997  EPA 1761.03 & OMB 2060 0345), will be integrated with ICR 0783.39( OMB 2060 0104 Reporting and Recordkeeping Requirements for Motor Vehicle Certification under proposed Tier 2 Rule), as part of the consolidation under the certification and fuel program reporting requirements. ICR 0783.39 expiration date is December 31, 200l. 3 The information collection will be conducted to support averaging, banking, and trading provisions included in the National LEV program. These averaging, banking, and trading provisions will give the automobile manufacturers a measure of flexibility in meeting the fleet average NMOG standards and the five percent cap on Tier 1 vehicles and TLEVs in the Ozone Transport Region( OTR). EPA will use the reported data to calculate credits and debits and otherwise ensure compliance with the applicable production levels. When a manufacturer has opted into the voluntary National LEV program, reporting will be mandatory as per the proposed regulations included in this rulemaking. This rulemaking would not change the requirements regarding confidentiality claims for submitted information, which are generally set out in 40 CFR Part 2.

2. NEED FOR AND USE OF THE COLLECTION 2( a) NEED/ AUTHORITY FOR THE COLLECTION Section 202 of the Clean Air Act gives EPA the authority to promulgate federal emission standards for new light duty motor vehicles and light duty trucks. In addition, nothing in section 202( b)( 1)( C) prevents EPA from promulgating a voluntary program separate from the mandatory Tier 1 standards.

In the NLEV regulation, EPA is promulgating a fleet average NMOG credit program as a regulatory feature designed to enhance the compliance flexibility for and reduce the burden on the effected manufacturers, without compromising the expected emissions benefit derived from the NLEV regulation. Operation of this program is similar to that of the California LEV program, on which the NLEV program was based. Manufacturers can certify vehicles to one of five different emissions standards. Compliance with the NLEV requirements is demonstrated by a manufacturer through calculation of a fleet average NMOG standard based on the emissions standards of the various types of vehicles that the manufacturer produced. This program will generally require manufacturers to calculate two separate fleet average NMOG levels; one for their products delivered for sale in the states of the Ozone Transport Region ( OTR) and another for states in the rest of the country, except California. The manufacturers will be able to apply a fleet average technology mix to minimize their costs while maintaining the flexibility to produce a variety of vehicles.

This reported data will also be used to determine manufacturers' compliance with the 5% cap provision, which limits the number of Tier 1 and TLEV certified vehicles that can be sold in the OTR. No additional data is required for EPA to make this calculation.

This program will also allow manufacturers to generate emission credits for use in averaging, banking, or trading. Under averaging and banking, a manufacturer could gain credits in the early years of the program by creating a fleet which falls below the applicable fleet average and use the fleet credits later when the standards are much more stringent. Credit generation calculations are simple and straightforward. This trading program will allow credit transactions between manufacturers at anytime, with trading information reported on an annual basis. 4 2( b) Practical Utility/ Users of the Data The annual reports provide essential credit accounting information from manufacturer's sales for the model year. EPA uses the reports to verify that manufacturers' fleet standards comply with the applicable NMOG standard. The data will also be used to provide assurances that the trading of credits between the manufacturers are based on existing credits.

3. NONDUPLICATION, CONSULTATIONS, AND OTHER COLLECTION CRITERIA 3( a) NONDUPLICATION Efforts have been made to eliminate duplication in this information collection. Credit trading information reporting was consolidated with annual reporting to reduce manufacturer reporting burden. Where possible, information requirements from various organizations within the Agency have been combined to minimize the requirement for manufacturers to submit duplicate information in different formats. Provisions included in this rule allow manufacturers to consolidate reporting requirements and/ or provide abbreviated reports where appropriate.

3( b) Public Notice Required Prior to ICR Submission to OMB In compliance with the 1995 PRA, public comment has been solicited in the Federal Register for this ICR for a 60 day period prior to submitting the ICR to OMB. The first Federal Register Notice was published February 21, 2001( 66 FR 11020), there were no comments received.

3( c) CONSULTATIONS EPA conducted a survey of five vehicle manufacturers for estimations of the number of hours required to perform activities related to this information collection request. The results of these consultations are incorporated in this document.

MANUFACTURERS INVOLVED IN THE SURVEYS ( AND CONTACTS):

John Rugge Subaru 609 488 8514 Mike Russ Mazda 313 930 2547 Mike Berube Chrysler 810 576 5499 5 Jim Ehlman General Motors 313 556 7765 Dave Millerick Ford 313 337 4090 3( d) EFFECTS OF LESS FREQUENT COLLECTION The information collection schedules listed in this document are essential for enforcement. Annual production information and credit calculations will enable EPA to perform accurate tracking and auditing and to verify at critical times that erroneous credits are not being generated or used. The annual reports ensure that manufacturers have reviewed their actual production volumes and will have an adequate opportunity to obtain credits in the event of a credit shortage. Annual reports include the final counts of vehicles and trucks that have been tracked to the point of first sale, and the data included in this report is entered into an EPA database. Maintenance of records on a yearly basis ensures manufacturer self auditing and provides adequate material for auditing by EPA. Based on the existing on highway heavy duty engine ABT program, EPA believes that a lower reporting frequency would not allow accurate monitoring of credits or evaluation of compliance with federal emission standards. Credit trading reporting is done on a yearly basis, which is the maximum time required to provide assurance that trades are valid.

3( e) GENERAL GUIDELINES This information collection activity complies with the guidelines in 5 CFR 1320.6, except for the following:

First, to provide EPA with a mechanism for auditing the accuracy of these required reports, EPA will require pertinent production information to be maintained and kept for eight model years. The eight year requirement arises from the phase in periods and the fact that credits have a four model year lifetime. EPA enforcement action regarding the credit program could require documentation justifying credit or debit generation from the beginning of the phase in and/ or four year credit lifetime period. Pertinent production information includes, but is not limited to, the number of vehicles or trucks sold in each averaging set, the EPA engine family, assembly plant, VIN number, and the NMOG standard to which the vehicle or truck is certified. Pertinent information, whether kept by the manufacturer or by a contractor, is subject to auditing by EPA. Consequently, EPA officials will require voluntary entry and access to facilities.

Manufacturers may be submitting a limited amount of proprietary information ( i. e. sales information) for EPA verification that the appropriate amount of credits have been accounted for and the emissions standards are projected to be met. This information has been collected in the past and will be safeguarded in the same manner as other certification data as required by EPA directives.

3( f) CONFIDENTIALITY 6 Some proprietary information may be submitted by the manufacturers. The information consists of production volumes. Confidentiality is granted in accordance with the Freedom of Information Act, EPA regulations at 40 CFR part 2, and class determination issued by EPA's Office of General Counsel.

3( g) Sensitive Questions Not applicable. No questions of a sensitive nature are asked.

4. THE RESPONDENTS AND INFORMATION REQUESTED 4 ( a) RESPONDENTS/ SIC CODES The respondents are motor vehicle and truck manufacturers ( SIC 3711).

4 ( b) INFORMATION REQUESTED ( i) Data items, Including Recordkeeping Requirements Annual report on these items for each averaging set ( 4 sets OTR region, 37 state region; and for each region, LDVs and LDTs 0 3750 lbs LVW class, LDTS 3750 5750 lbs LVW class):

1. Applicable fleet average NMOG value 2. All values required to calculate the NMOG value 3. The number of credits generated or debits incurred 4. All the values required to calculate the credits/ debits [ See § 86.1712 97( b)( 1 2)]

NMOG credit transfer reports includes:

1. Name of credit provider 2. Name of credit recipient 3. Model year in which the credits were earned 4. The date the transfer occurred 5. The region to which the credits belong 6. Number of credits traded 7 [ See § 86.1712 97( b)( 3)]

Maintenance of records for each averaging set of each model year includes:

1. Model year 2. Averaging set 3. Applicable fleet average NMOG value 4. Values used to calculate the fleet average NMOG value [ See § 86.1712 97( a)( 1)]

Maintenance of records for each vehicle or truck would include:

1. Model year 2. Averaging set 3. EPA engine family 4. Assembly plant 5. Vehicle Identification number 6. NMOG standard certified 7. Point of first retail sale including the purchaser, city, and state [ See § 86.1712 97( a)( 2)]

Records relating to this reporting requirement shall be kept by the manufacturers for eight years.

( ii) Respondent Activities 1) Familiarization with the Fleet Average NMOG credit program 2) Submit the certification category of the vehicle or truck with the certification application 3) Gather information regarding the point of first sale 4) Monitor sales volumes to OTR and 37 state regions to ensure that the fleet NMOG standard is not exceeded 5) Develop and submit NMOG annual reports 6) Develop and submit credit transfer reports 7) Store, file, and maintain information required to be maintained 5. THE INFORMATION COLLECTED AGENCY ACTIVITIES, COLLECTION 8 METHODOLOGY, AND INFORMATION MANAGEMENT 5( a) AGENCY ACTIVITIES 1) Set up a database to manage the data collected 2) Answer respondent questions 3) Review submitted reports 4) Enter data from the reports into the database 5) Audit reports and records 5( b) Collection Methodology and Management The methodology and management of the information collected will be similar to the process used for the on highway ABT program since 1990. The information submitted at the time of certification and the annual report can be reported in a standard format. To allow the manufacturers to tailor the reports for efficient utilization of their individual software systems, the information requested may be submitted in an alternate format as the manufacturer deems desirable and the Administrator deems acceptable. The information requested is amenable to electronic transfer, i. e. via telefax or computer interface, but written certification of accuracy would be necessary. It is possible that electronic transfer via computer interface may require development of new or modification of existing software.

When the data is received, EPA will review the data for compliance and enter the data into a database resembling that of the on highway program. EPA may also audit manufacturers' records at appropriate times during on going Selective Enforcement Audits to ensure the accuracy and validity of the manufacturer's data. Public access of non confidential data will be made available upon request.

5( c) Small Entity Flexibility Participation in the Fleet Average NMOG Credit Program is optional for light duty vehicle and truck manufacturers. The information being requested is the absolute minimum needed to effectively conduct and maintain integrity of the required certification and enforcement programs. All requested information can be reported in summary form together with a certification of accuracy. Further measures to simplify reporting for small businesses do not appear prudent or necessary. There are several provisions in the NLEV program which give small manufacturers additional time to meet the requirements. Additional provisions allow manufacturers the ability to simplify their reporting requirements if their fleet production meets certain criteria.

5( d) Collection Schedule 1 Respondents per year is based on 18 light duty vehicle and truck manufacturers.

2 This is based on an EPA estimate that 10% of the participating manufacturers will trade credits.

9 Initial information concerning the emission standard the vehicle is certified to is included in the certification application which is submitted before the vehicle or truck is sold in the U. S.

Annual reports and credit trading information will be submitted no later than May 1 of the calendar year following the given model year.

6. ESTIMATING THE BURDEN AND COST OF THE COLLECTION 6( a) ESTIMATING RESPONDENT BURDEN Collection Burden Hours Freq. 1 Total annual Activity Mgmt./ tech Cler burden hours 1) Familiarization with the credit program 80/ 20 1 80/ 20 provisions 2) Annual sales report Covered by an existing ICR 3) Gather information regarding point of first 60/ 45 1 60/ 45 sale 4) Credit or debit 13/ 3 1 13/ 3 calculations 5) Store, file, and 10/ 10 1 10/ 10 maintain information required 6) Credit transfer report 2/ 1 .12 .2/. 1 TOTAL ANNUAL BURDEN ( MANAGEMENT)= 163 hrs TOTAL ANNUAL BURDEN ( TECH./ CLER.)= 78 hrs TOTAL ANNUAL BURDEN= 18 x 241 = 4338 10 6( b) ESTIMATING RESPONDENT BURDEN COST Reference respondent estimate cost chart 6 b Hourly pay rates were calculated from another survey conducted of four engine manufacturers for the Selective Enforcement Audit ICR. Manufacturers provided pay rates, including benefits and overhead, for the following categories: management, engineer, machinist, mechanic, technician, and junior Professional/ clerical. Since the pay rates did not differ greatly, and for convenience, an average pay rate of $ 147.00/ hour is used for management, engineers, machinists, mechanics, and technicians. The average junior professional/ clerical pay rate is $ 101.00.

Chart 6b Annual respondent cost estimate Collection Burden Hours Freq. Total annual Activity @ 147/@ 101 Cost 1) Familiarization 80/ 20 1 $ 13,780 with the credit program provisions 2) Annual sales report Covered by an existing ICR 3) Gather information 60/ 45 1 $ 13, 365 regarding point of first retail sale 4) Credit or debit 13/ 3 1 $ 2,214 calculations 5) Store, file, and 10/ 10 1 $ 2,480 maintain information required 6) Credit transfer report 2/ 1 .1 $ 395.00 TOTAL ANNUAL COST= $ 32,234 Respondents are not expected to make capital cost investments in order to meet this information collection. Manufacturers currently have tracking 11 systems for their product and additional hardware should be unnecessary. Software development should also be unnecessary in that reporting sytems for annual production reports, corporate average fuel economy ( CAFE) reports, heavy duty averaging, banking, and trading programs, and some state emission control programs are currently in existence and should be amenable to the reporting requirements in this proposal.

6( c) ESTIMATING AGENCY BURDEN AND COST EPA based its own burden estimates on experience from the information collection activities performed in the on highway heavy duty engine ABT program, since the administrative requirements for both programs are the same. Assuming 18 eligible manufacturers, the Agency would be required to manage approximately 18 reports per year.

Chart 6c Collection Burden Hours Freq. Hrs Cost Activity Mgmt/ Tech Cler.

@$ 65 1) Set up database 20 1 20 $ 1,300 to manage the data collected 2) Answer respondent 50 1 50 $ 3,250 questions 3) Review submitted 1 18 18 $ 1,170 reports 4) Enter data from 1 18 18 $ 1,170 reports into database 5) Audit reports and 15 1 15 $ 975 records TOTAL AGENCY ANNUAL BURDEN: 121 hrs TOTAL AGENCY ANNUAL COST: $ 7,865 6( d) ESTIMATING THE RESPONDENT UNIVERSE AND TOTAL BURDEN AND COSTS 12 All costs were taken from the current BLS Tables with 110% added.

Number of respondents = 18 Number of hours = ( 241 x 18) 4,338 Cost = ($ 32,234 x 18) $ 580,212 6( e) BOTTOM LINE BURDEN HOURS/ COSTS BURDEN TABLES ( i) Respondent Tally The number of respondents for the following formulas is 18.

Chart 6 D1 Bottom line respondent burden estimate Collection Burden Hours Freq. Annual Annual Activity Mgmt/ Tech Cler. Hours Cost @ $ 147 @ $ 101 1) Familiarization 80 20 1 100 $ 13,780 with the credit program provisions 2) Annual sales report Covered by an existing ICR 3) Gather information 60 45 1 105 $ 13,365 regarding point of first retail sale 3) Credit or debit 13 3 1 16 $ 2,214 calculations 4) Store, file, and 10 10 1 20 $ 2,480 maintain information required 5) Credit transfer report 2 1 .1 .3 $ 395 13 241 $ 32,234 ANNUAL TOTAL BURDEN: total annual burden( 241 hrs) x no. Respondents ( 18)= 4338 hrs. ANNUAL TOTAL COST: total annual cost ($ 32,234 x no. Respondents ( 18) = $ 580,212 ( ii) The Agency tally The average government technical pay rate is $ 48 per hour.

Chart  6( d)( ii) Agency Burden/ Cost Estimates Collection Burden Hours Freq. Hrs Cost Activity Mgmt/ Tech Cler.

@$ 48 1) Set up database 20 1 20 $ 960 to manage the data collected 2) Answer respondent 50 1 50 $ 2,400 questions 3) Review submitted 1 18 18 $ 864 reports 4) Enter data from 1 18 18 $ 864 reports into database 5) Audit reports and 15 1 15 $ 720 records TOTAL AGENCY ANNUAL BURDEN: 121 hrs TOTAL AGENCY ANNUAL COST: $ 5,808 ( iv) Variations in the Annual Bottom Line No annual variations in the respondent reporting/ recordkeeping burden or cost over the course of this clearance period 14 are expected.

6( f) REASONS FOR CHANGE IN BURDEN The change in burden from the previous ICR is due to a decrease in the number of respondents, from 25 to 18. This is due to the number of automobile manufacturers who submitted reports. This decrease in respondents has reduced the burden hours by 1,694.

6( g) BURDEN STATEMENT The total annual reporting and recordkeeping burden for this information collection is estimated to be 4,338 hours and $ 580,212 in annual costs. The average burden per respondent is 241 hours. It is expected that approximately 18 manufacturers will provide an annual report to EPA. The actual burden for an individual manufacturer will vary depending upon the manufacturer specific variables, such as the number of engine families, production changes, emissions defects, and so forth.

Burden means the total time, effort, or financial resources expended by persons to generate, maintain, retain, or disclose or provide information to or for a Federal agency. This includes the time needed to review instructions; develop, acquire, install, and utilize technology and systems for the purposes of collecting, validating, and verifying information, processing and maintaining information, and disclosing and providing information; adjust the existing ways to comply with any previously applicable instructions and requirements; train personnel to be able to respond to a collection of information, search data sources; complete and review the collection of information; and transmit or otherwise disclose the information. An Agency may not conduct or sponsor, and a person is not required to respond to a collection of information unless it displays a currently valid OMB control number. The OMB control numbers for EPA's regulations are listed in 40 CFR part 9 and 48 CFR Chapter 15.

6( h) Public Notice Send comments on the Agency's need for this information, the accuracy of the provided burden estimates, and any suggested methods for minimizing respondent burden, including through the use of automated collection techniques to the Director, Collection Strategies Division, U. S. Environmental Protection Agency ( 2822), 1200 Pennsylvania, N. W., Washington, D. C. 20460 0001; and to the Office of Information and Regulatory Affairs, Office of Management and Budget, 725 17th Street, NW, Washington, DC 20503, Attention: Desk Officer for EPA,. Include the ICR number and OMB control number in any correspondence. 15