[Federal Register Volume 76, Number 187 (Tuesday, September 27, 2011)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Pages 59501-59502]
[FR Doc No: 2011-24692]

========================================================================
Rules and Regulations
                                                Federal Register
________________________________________________________________________

This section of the FEDERAL REGISTER contains regulatory documents
having general applicability and legal effect, most of which are keyed
to and codified in the Code of Federal Regulations, which is published
under 50 titles pursuant to 44 U.S.C. 1510.

The Code of Federal Regulations is sold by the Superintendent of Documents.
Prices of new books are listed in the first FEDERAL REGISTER issue of each
week.

========================================================================

Federal Register / Vol. 76, No. 187 / Tuesday, September 27, 2011 /
Rules and Regulations

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION

Federal Aviation Administration

14 CFR Part 71

[Docket No. FAA-2011-0579; Airspace Docket No. 11-AEA-14]

Amendment of Class D and E Airspace and Revocation of Class E
Airspace; Manassas, VA

AGENCY: Federal Aviation Administration (FAA), DOT.

ACTION: Final rule.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: This action amends Class D and Class E airspace areas and
removes Class E airspace designated as an extension at Manassas
Regional Airport/Harry P. Davis Field, Manassas, VA. A Standard
Instrument Approach Procedure has been cancelled. Therefore
modification to the airspace areas is required for the safety and
airspace management of Instrument Flight Rules (IFR) operations at the
airport. This action also notes the name change of the airport.

DATES: Effective date: 0901 UTC, December 15, 2011. The Director of the
Federal Register approves this incorporation by reference action under
title 1, Code of Federal Regulations, part 51, subject to the annual
revision of FAA Order 7400.9 and publication of conforming amendments.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: John Fornito, Airspace Specialist,
Operations Support Group, Eastern Service Center, Air Traffic
Organization, Federal Aviation Administration, P.O. Box 20636, Atlanta,
Georgia 30320; telephone<PHONE_NUMBER>.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

 History

    On July 1, 2011, the FAA published in the Federal Register a notice
of proposed rulemaking (NPRM) to amend Class D and Class E surface
airspace and remove Class E airspace designated as an extension at
Manassas Regional Airport/Harry P. Davis Field (76 FR 38581).
Interested parties were invited to participate in this rulemaking
effort by submitting written comments on the proposal to the FAA. No
comments were received. Also, the airport name change was inadvertently
omitted in the NPRM, and is correctly noted in this rule. Class D and E
airspace designations are published in paragraphs 5000, 6002, and 6004,
respectively, of FAA Order 7400.9V dated August 9, 2011, and effective
September 15, 2011, which is incorporated by reference in 14 CFR 71.1.
The Class D and Class E airspace designations listed in this document
will be published subsequently in the Order.

The Rule

    This action amends Title 14, Code of Federal Regulations (14 CFR)
part 71 to amend Class D and E surface airspace at Manassas Regional
Airport/Harry P. Davis Field, Manassas, VA. Airspace reconfiguration is
necessary due to the cancellation of the VOR approach into the airport.
Class E airspace designated as an extension to Class D airspace is no
longer needed and is, therefore, removed. This action also notes the
airport's name change from Manassas Municipal Airport/Harry P. Davis
Airport to Manassas Regional Airport/Harry P. Davis Field. This action
enhances the safety and management of IFR operations at the airport.
    The FAA has determined that this regulation only involves an
established body of technical regulations for which frequent and
routine amendments are necessary to keep them operationally current.
It, therefore, (1) Is not a ``significant regulatory action'' under
Executive Order 12866; (2) is not a ``significant rule'' under DOT
Regulatory Policies and Procedures (44 FR 11034; February 26, 1979);
and (3) does not warrant preparation of a Regulatory Evaluation as the
anticipated impact is so minimal. Since this is a routine matter that
will only affect air traffic procedures and air navigation, it is
certified that this rule, when promulgated, would not have a
significant economic impact on a substantial number of small entities
under the criteria of the Regulatory Flexibility Act.
    The FAA's authority to issue rules regarding aviation safety is
found in Title 49 of the United States Code. Subtitle I, section 106,
describes the authority of the FAA Administrator. Subtitle VII,
Aviation Programs, describes in more detail the scope of the agency's
authority.
    This rulemaking is promulgated under the authority described in
subtitle VII, part A, subpart I, section 40103. Under that section, the
FAA is charged with prescribing regulations to assign the use of
airspace necessary to ensure the safety of aircraft and the efficient
use of airspace. This regulation is within the scope of that authority
as it amends Class D and E airspace at Manassas Regional Airport/Harry
P. Davis Field, Manassas, VA.

List of Subjects in 14 CFR Part 71

    Airspace, Incorporation by reference, Navigation (Air).

Adoption of the Amendment

    In consideration of the foregoing, the Federal Aviation
Administration amends 14 CFR part 71 as follows:

PART 71--DESIGNATION OF CLASS A, B, C, D, AND E AIRSPACE AREAS; AIR
TRAFFIC SERVICE ROUTES; AND REPORTING POINTS

0
1. The authority citation for part 71 continues to read as follows:

    Authority: 49 U.S.C. 106(g); 40103, 40113, 40120; E.O. 10854, 24
FR 9565, 3 CFR, 1959-1963 Comp., p. 389.

Sec.  71.1  [Amended]

0
2. The incorporation by reference in 14 CFR 71.1 of Federal Aviation
Administration Order 7400.9V, Airspace Designations and Reporting
Points, signed August 9, 2011, and effective September 15, 2011, is
amended as follows:

Paragraph 5000 Class D airspace.

* * * * *

AEA VA D Manassas, VA [Amended]

Manassas Regional Airport/Harry P. Davis Field, VA
    (Lat. 38[deg]43'17'' N., long. 77[deg]30'56'' W.)

    That airspace extending upward from the surface to but not
including 2,000 feet MSL within a 5-mile radius of the Manassas
Regional Airport/Harry P. Davis Field, excluding that airspace
within the Washington Tri-Area Class B airspace area. This Class D
airspace area is effective during

the specific dates and times established in advance by a Notice to
Airmen. The effective date and time will thereafter be continuously
published in the Airport/Facility Directory.

Paragraph 6002 Class E airspace designated as surface areas.

* * * * *

AEA VA E2 Manassas, VA [Amended]

Manassas Regional Airport/Harry P. Davis Field, VA
    (Lat. 38[deg]43'17'' N., long. 77[deg]30'56'' W.)

    That airspace extending upward from the surface to but not
including 2,000 feet MSL within a 5-mile radius of the Manassas
Regional Airport/Harry P. Davis Field, excluding that airspace
within the Washington Tri-Area Class B airspace area. This Class E
airspace area is effective during the specific dates and times
established in advance by a Notice to Airmen. The effective date and
time will thereafter be continuously published in the Airport/
Facility Directory.

Paragraph 6004 Class E airspace designated as an Extension to a
Class D surface area.

* * * * *

AEA VA E4 Manassas, VA [Removed]

    Issued in College Park, Georgia, on September 19, 2011.
Mark D. Ward,
Manager, Operations Support Group, Eastern Service Center, Air Traffic
Organization.
[FR Doc. 2011-24692 Filed 9-26-11; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910-13-P


1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 TWF 85,769 3,033,965 5,760,600 14,109,162 47,308,608 51,204,604 23,498,504 9,556,087 10,595,715 411,193 2,021 6,586 7,632,827 557,309,038 692,931,538 43,819,385 703,584,499 TM 17 Distrib. 0.017603 0.001708 0.000302 0.000040 0.000045 0.000101 0.000004 0.000804 0.000066 0.057144 0.193107 0.729076 0.000000 0.000000 0.000001 0.000000 0.000000 1.00 Release ( g) Release ( lbs)

KOPPERS INC 45.22 0.099693 150.51 516.53 173.52 55.80 214.37 515.68 10.16 765.91 69.38 2,342.50 38.91 478.69 0.00 0.00 43.83 0.00 0.00 5,375.79 ELECTRIC MILLS WOOD PRESERVING L. L. C. 5.2111 0.011488 17.35 59.52 20.00 6.43 24.70 59.43 1.17 88.26 8.00 269.95 4.48 55.16 0.00 0.00 5.05 0.00 0.00 619.50 BROWN WOOD PRESERVING CO.

INC. 39 0.085980 129.81 445.48 149.65 48.13 184.88 444.75 8.76 660.56 59.84 2,020.29 33.56 412.85 0.00 0.00 37.80 0.00 0.00 4,636.35 HUXFORD POLE & TIMBER CO INC 34.2651 0.075542 114.05 391.40 131.48 42.28 162.44 390.75 7.70 580.36 52.57 1,775.01 29.48 362.73 0.00 0.00 33.21 0.00 0.00 4,073.46 DIS TRAN WOOD PRODS. L. L. C. 29.8096 0.065719 99.22 340.51 114.38 36.79 141.31 339.94 6.69 504.90 45.74 1,544.20 25.65 315.56 0.00 0.00 28.89 0.00 0.00 3,543.79 WILLIAM C MEREDITH CO INC 19.3193 0.042592 64.30 220.68 74.13 23.84 91.58 220.31 4.34 327.22 29.64 1,000.78 16.62 204.51 0.00 0.00 18.73 0.00 0.00 2,296.69 CAHABA PRESSURE TREATED FOREST PRODS.

INC. 17.4951 0.038570 58.23 199.84 67.13 21.59 82.94 199.51 3.93 296.32 26.84 906.29 15.05 185.20 0.00 0.00 16.96 0.00 0.00 2,079.83 INTERNATIONAL PAPER 6.6486 0.014658 22.13 75.94 25.51 8.20 31.52 75.82 1.49 112.61 10.20 344.41 5.72 70.38 0.00 0.00 6.44 0.00 0.00 790.39 WEYERHAEUSER WOOD TREATING 5 0.011023 16.64 57.11 19.19 6.17 23.70 57.02 1.12 84.69 7.67 259.01 4.30 52.93 0.00 0.00 4.85 0.00 0.00 594.40 WHEELER LUMBER LLC 3.8007 0.008379 12.65 43.41 14.58 4.69 18.02 43.34 0.85 64.37 5.83 196.88 3.27 40.23 0.00 0.00 3.68 0.00 0.00 451.83 CASCADE POLE &

LUMBER CO. 1.903 0.004195 6.33 21.74 7.30 2.35 9.02 21.70 0.43 32.23 2.92 98.58 1.64 20.14 0.00 0.00 1.84 0.00 0.00 226.23 COLFAX TREATING CO LLC 1.6516 0.003641 5.50 18.87 6.34 2.04 7.83 18.83 0.37 27.97 2.53 85.56 1.42 17.48 0.00 0.00 1.60 0.00 0.00 196.34 J. H. BAXTER &

CO 1.3084 0.002885 4.36 14.95 5.02 1.61 6.20 14.92 0.29 22.16 2.01 67.78 1.13 13.85 0.00 0.00 1.27 0.00 0.00 155.54 L. D. MCFARLAND CO. 0.915 0.002017 3.05 10.45 3.51 1.13 4.34 10.43 0.21 15.50 1.40 47.40 0.79 9.69 0.00 0.00 0.89 0.00 0.00 108.78 INTERNATIONAL PAPER CO 0.7123 0.001570 2.37 8.14 2.73 0.88 3.38 8.12 0.16 12.06 1.09 36.90 0.61 7.54 0.00 0.00 0.69 0.00 0.00 84.68 T. R. MILLER MILL CO INC 0.2256 0.000497 0.75 2.58 0.87 0.28 1.07 2.57 0.05 3.82 0.35 11.69 0.19 2.39 0.00 0.00 0.22 0.00 0.00 26.82 PERMAPOST PRODUCTS CO 0.1641 0.000362 0.55 1.87 0.63 0.20 0.78 1.87 0.04 2.78 0.25 8.50 0.14 1.74 0.00 0.00 0.16 0.00 0.00 19.51 OESER CO. 0.1481 0.000327 0.49 1.69 0.57 0.18 0.70 1.69 0.03 2.51 0.23 7.67 0.13 1.57 0.00 0.00 0.14 0.00 0.00 17.61 BALDWIN POLE &

PILING CO INC 0.1001 0.000221 0.33 1.14 0.38 0.12 0.47 1.14 0.02 1.70 0.15 5.19 0.09 1.06 0.00 0.00 0.10 0.00 0.00 11.90 TAYLOR LUMBER & TREATING INC. 0.0439 0.000097 0.15 0.50 0.17 0.05 0.21 0.50 0.01 0.74 0.07 2.27 0.04 0.46 0.00 0.00 0.04 0.00 0.00 5.22 TOTAL 25,314.66 REVISED TRI Surface Water Discharges for Facilities in Lumber ( SIC 24): Dioxin and Dioxin like compounds, U. S., 2001 ( Zero Non detects) Dioxin and Dioxin like compounds Number CAS # Chemical Name 1 67562 39 4 1,2,3,4,6,7,8 Heptachlorodibenzofuran 2 55673 89 7 1,2,3,4,7,8,9 Heptachlorodibenzofuran 3 70648 26 9 1,2,3,4,7,8 Hexachlorodibenzofuran 4 57117 44 9 1,2,3,6,7,8 Hexachlorodibenzofuran 5 72918 21 9 1,2,3,7,8,9 Hexachlorodibenzofuran 6 60851 34 5 2,3,4,6,7,8 Hexachlorodibenzofuran 7 39227 28 6 1,2,3,4,7,8 Hexachlorodibenzo p dioxin 8 57653 85 7 1,2,3,6,7,8 Hexachlorodibenzo p dioxin 9 19408 74 3 1,2,3,7,8,9 Hexachlorodibenzo p dioxin 10 35822 46 9 1,2,3,4,6,7,8 Heptachlorodibenzo p dioxin 11 39001 02 0 1,2,3,4,6,7,8,9 Octachlorodibenzofuran 12 3268 87 9 1,2,3,4,6,7,8,9 Octachlorodibenzo p dioxin 13 57117 41 6 1,2,3,7,8 Pentachlorodibenzofuran 14 57117 31 4 2,3,4,7,8 Pentachlorodibenzofuran 15 40321 76 4 1,2,3,7,8 Pentachlorodibenzo p dioxin 16 51207 31 9 2,3,7,8 Tetrachlorodibenzofuran 17 1746 01 6 2,3,7,8 Tetrachlorodibenzo p dioxin


[Federal Register: March 14, 2008 (Volume 73, Number 51)]
[Notices]
[Page 13875-13876]
[DOCID:fr14mr08-49]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission

[Project No. 2165-022]

 Alabama Power Company; Notice of Availability of Environmental
Assessment

March 7, 2008.
    In accordance with the National Environmental Policy Act of 1969
and the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission's (Commission)
regulations, 18 CFR part 380 (Order No.

486, 52 FR 47897), the Office of Energy Projects has reviewed the
application for a New Major License for the Warrior River Hydroelectric
Project, which includes the Lewis Smith and Bankhead developments.
    The Lewis Smith development is located in north central Alabama in
the headwaters of the Black Warrior River on the Sipsey Fork in
Cullman, Walker, and Winston Counties. The Bankhead development is
located in west central Alabama downstream of the Lewis Smith
development, on the Black Warrior River in Tuscaloosa County. The Lewis
Smith development occupies 2,691.44 acres of federal lands administered
by the U.S. Forest Service, and the Bankhead development occupies 18.7
acres of federal lands administered by the Bureau of Land Management.
Staff has prepared an Environmental Assessment (EA) for the project.
    The EA contains staff's analysis of the potential environmental
effects of the project and concludes that licensing the project, with
appropriate environmental protective measures, would not constitute a
major federal action that would significantly affect the quality of the
human environment.
    A copy of the EA is available for review at the Commission in the
Public Reference Room or may be viewed on the Commission's Web site at
http://www.ferc.gov using the ``eLibrary'' link. Enter the docket
number excluding the last three digits in the docket number field to
access the document. For assistance, contact FERC Online Support at
<EMAIL_ADDRESS>or toll-free at 1-866-208-3676, or for TTY,
(202) 502-8659.
    Any comments should be filed within 30 days from the date of this
notice and should be addressed to: Kimberly D. Bose, Secretary, Federal
Energy Regulatory Commission, 888 First Street, NE., Washington, DC
20426. Please affix Project No. 2165-022 to all comments. Comments may
be filed electronically via the Internet in lieu of paper. The
Commission strongly encourages electronic filings. See 18 CFR
385.2001(a)(1)(iii) and the instructions on the Commission's Web site
(http://www.ferc.gov) under the ``e-Filing'' link.
    For further information, please contact Janet Hutzel at (202) 502-
8675 or at<EMAIL_ADDRESS>
Kimberly D. Bose,
 Secretary.
 [FR Doc. E8-5118 Filed 3-13-08; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 6717-01-P


[Federal Register: December 1, 2009 (Volume 229, Number 74)]
[Notices]
[Page 62845]
[DOCID:fr01de09-133]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

Proposed Collection; Comment Request

Upon Written Request; Copies Available From: Securities and Exchange
Commission, Office of Investor Education and Advocacy, Washington, DC
20549-0213.

Extension: Rule 14f-1, OMB Control No. 3235-0108, SEC File No. 270-
127.

    Notice is hereby given that, pursuant to the Paperwork Reduction
Act of 1995 (44 U.S.C. 3501 et seq.), the Securities and Exchange
Commission (``Commission'') is soliciting comments on the collection of
information summarized below. The Commission plans to submit this
existing collection of information to the Office of Management and
Budget for extension and approval.
    Exchange Act Rule 14f-1 (17 CFR 240.14f-1) requires a registrant to
disclose a change in a majority of the directors of the registrant. The
information filed under Rule 14f-1 must be filed with the Commission
and is publicly available. We estimate that it takes approximately 18
burden hours to provide the information required under Rule 14f-1 and
that the information is filed by approximately 172 respondents for a
total annual reporting burden of 3,096 hours.
    Written comments are invited on: (a) Whether this proposed
collection of information is necessary for the performance of the
functions of the agency, including whether the information will have
practical utility; (b) the accuracy of the agency's estimate of the
burden imposed by the collection of information; (c) ways to enhance
the quality, utility, and clarity of the information collected; and (d)
ways to minimize the burden of the collection of information on
respondents, including through the use of automated collection
techniques or other forms of information technology. Consideration will
be given to comments and suggestions submitted in writing within 60
days of this publication.
    Please direct your written comment to Charles Boucher, Director/
CIO, Securities and Exchange Commission, C/O Shirley Martinson, 6432
General Green Way, Alexandria, Virginia 22312; or send an e-mail to:
<EMAIL_ADDRESS>
    Dated: November 24, 2009.
Elizabeth M. Murphy,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. E9-28690 Filed 11-30-09; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 8011-01-P


[Federal Register Volume 78, Number 247 (Tuesday, December 24, 2013)]
[Notices]
[Pages 77782-77784]
[FR Doc No: 2013-30715]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION

Federal Motor Carrier Safety Administration

[Docket No. FMCSA-1999-5748; FMCSA-2001-9561; FMCSA-2003-15268; FMCSA-
2003-15892; FMCSA-2005-20560; FMCSA-2005-21254; FMCSA-2005-21711;
FMCSA-2006-24783; FMCSA-2006-26653; FMCSA-2007-27897; FMCSA-2009-0054;
FMCSA-2009-0121; FMCSA-2009-0154; FMCSA-2009-0206; FMCSA-2010-0354;
FMCSA-2011-0092; FMCSA-2011-0124; FMCSA-2011-0141; FMCSA-2011-0142;
FMCSA-2011-0189]

Qualification of Drivers; Exemption Applications; Vision

AGENCY: Federal Motor Carrier Safety Administration (FMCSA), DOT.

ACTION: Notice of renewal of exemptions; request for comments.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: FMCSA announces its decision to renew the exemptions from the
vision requirement in the Federal Motor Carrier Safety Regulations for
74 individuals. FMCSA has statutory authority to exempt individuals
from the vision requirement if the exemptions granted will not
compromise safety. The Agency has concluded that granting these
exemption renewals will provide a level of safety that is equivalent to
or greater than the level of safety maintained without the exemptions
for these commercial motor vehicle (CMV) drivers.

DATES: This decision is effective January 31, 2014. Comments must be
received on or before January 23, 2014.

ADDRESSES: You may submit comments bearing the Federal Docket
Management System (FDMS) numbers: Docket No. [Docket No. FMCSA-1999-
5748; FMCSA-2001-9561; FMCSA-2003-15268; FMCSA-2003-15892; FMCSA-2005-
20560; FMCSA-2005-21254; FMCSA-2005-21711; FMCSA-2006-24783; FMCSA-
2006-26653; FMCSA-2007-27897; FMCSA-2009-0054; FMCSA-2009-0121; FMCSA-
2009-0154; FMCSA-2009-0206; FMCSA-2010-0354; FMCSA-2011-0092; FMCSA-
2011-0124; FMCSA-2011-0141; FMCSA-2011-0142; FMCSA-2011-0189], using
any of the following methods:
     Federal eRulemaking Portal: Go to http://www.regulations.gov. Follow the on-line instructions for submitting
comments.
     Mail: Docket Management Facility; U.S. Department of
Transportation, 1200 New Jersey Avenue SE., West Building Ground Floor,
Room W12-140, Washington, DC 20590-0001.
     Hand Delivery or Courier: West Building Ground Floor, Room
W12-140, 1200 New Jersey Avenue SE., Washington, DC, between 9 a.m. and
5 p.m., Monday through Friday, except Federal Holidays.
     Fax: 1-202-493-2251.
    Instructions: Each submission must include the Agency name and the
docket number for this notice. Note that DOT posts all comments
received without change to http://www.regulations.gov, including any
personal information included in a comment. Please see the Privacy Act
heading below.
    Docket: For access to the docket to read background documents or
comments, go to http://www.regulations.gov at any time or Room W12-140
on the ground level of the West Building, 1200 New Jersey Avenue SE.,
Washington, DC, between 9 a.m. and 5 p.m., Monday through Friday,
except Federal holidays. The Federal Docket Management System (FDMS) is
available 24 hours each day, 365 days each year. If you want
acknowledgment that we received your comments, please include a self-
addressed, stamped envelope or postcard or print the acknowledgement
page that appears after submitting comments on-line.
    Privacy Act: Anyone may search the electronic form of all comments
received into any of our dockets by the name of the individual
submitting the comment (or of the person signing the comment, if
submitted on behalf of an association, business, labor union, etc.).
You may review DOT's Privacy Act Statement for the Federal Docket
Management System (FDMS) published in the Federal Register on January
17, 2008 (73 FR 3316).

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Elaine M. Papp, Chief, Medical
Programs Division,<PHONE_NUMBER><EMAIL_ADDRESS>FMCSA,
Department of Transportation, 1200 New Jersey Avenue SE., Room W64-224,
Washington, DC 20590-0001. Office hours are from 8:30 a.m. to 5 p.m.
Monday through Friday, except Federal holidays.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

Background

    Under 49 U.S.C. 31136(e) and 31315, FMCSA may renew an exemption
from the vision requirements in 49 CFR 391.41(b)(10), which applies to
drivers of CMVs in interstate commerce, for a two-year period if it
finds ``such exemption would likely achieve a level of safety that is
equivalent to or greater than the level that would be achieved

absent such exemption.'' The procedures for requesting an exemption
(including renewals) are set out in 49 CFR part 381.

Exemption Decision

    This notice addresses 74 individuals who have requested renewal of
their exemptions in accordance with FMCSA procedures. FMCSA has
evaluated these 74 applications for renewal on their merits and decided
to extend each exemption for a renewable two-year period. They are:

Stephan P. Adamczyk (ME)
Martin R. Anaya (NM)
Calvin D. Atwood (NM)
Anthony D. Buck (TX)
Shaun E. Burnett (IA)
Kevin W. Cannon (TX)
James J. Doan (PA)
Shennan E. Dorsey (GA)
Michael M. Edleston (MA)
Kenneth J. Fisk (MI)
Richard L. Gagnebin (KS)
Jonathan M. Gentry (TN)
James P. Greene (NY)
Vincent E. Hardin (AL)
Bradley O. Hart (UT)
Robert W. Healey, Jr. (NJ)
Daniel F. Albers (CA)
Darrell G. Anthony (TX)
Gregory W. Babington (MA)
Stacey J. Buckingham (ID)
Gary E. Butler (MT)
Andrew B. Clayton (TN)
William P. Doolittle (MO)
Steve E. Duran (NM)
Daniel W. Eynon (OH)
James E. Fix (SC)
Steven A. Garrity (MA)
Mark E. Gessner (FL)
Matthew K. Hagge (ND)
Larry L. Harris (OH)
Benny D. Hatton, Jr. (NY)
Dennis H. Heller (KS)
Nathaniel H. Herbert, Jr. (PA)
Volga Kirkwood (MO)
James E. Knarr, Sr. (NY)
Michael A. Lawson (KY)
Everett H. Logan (OH)
Joseph L. Mast (OR)
Jesse R. McClary, Sr. (MO)
Kevin L. Moody (OH)
Marvin L. Motes (FL)
Charles W. Mullenix (GA)
Richard W. O'Neill (WA)
Harold L. Pearsall (PA)
John N. Poland (IL)
James B. Prunty (WV)
Garry L. Rogers (CO)
Benjamin R. Sauder (PA)
Robert E. Smith (CT)
Gerald D. Stidham (CO)
Scott C. Teich (MN)
Virgil E. Walker (TX)
John C. Young (VA)
Randy L. Huelster (OK)
Roger D. Kloss (IL)
Mark D. Kraft (IL)
Steven R. Lechtenberg (NE)
Thomas W. Markham (MN)
Paul G. Mathes (WA)
John T. McWilliams (IA)
Terry W. Moore (LA)
Jeffrey A. Mueller (IL)
Steven D. O'Donnell (NJ)
Jerry R. Orndorff (WV)
Robert M. Pickett II (MI)
Phillip M. Pridgen, Sr. (MD)
Eligio M. Ramirez (TX)
Jason W. Rupp (PA)
Eric W. Schmidt (MO)
Jerry W. Stanfill (AR)
Wilfred E. Sweatt (NH)
Roger L. Unser (OR)
Gary M. Wolff (IL)
John F. Zalar (NY)

    The exemptions are extended subject to the following conditions:
(1) That each individual has a physical examination every year (a) by
an ophthalmologist or optometrist who attests that the vision in the
better eye continues to meet the requirements in 49 CFR 391.41(b)(10),
and (b) by a medical examiner who attests that the individual is
otherwise physically qualified under 49 CFR 391.41; (2) that each
individual provides a copy of the ophthalmologist's or optometrist's
report to the medical examiner at the time of the annual medical
examination; and (3) that each individual provide a copy of the annual
medical certification to the employer for retention in the driver's
qualification file and retains a copy of the certification on his/her
person while driving for presentation to a duly authorized Federal,
State, or local enforcement official. Each exemption will be valid for
two years unless rescinded earlier by FMCSA. The exemption will be
rescinded if: (1) The person fails to comply with the terms and
conditions of the exemption; (2) the exemption has resulted in a lower
level of safety than was maintained before it was granted; or (3)
continuation of the exemption would not be consistent with the goals
and objectives of 49 U.S.C. 31136(e) and 31315.

Basis for Renewing Exemptions

    Under 49 U.S.C. 31315(b)(1), an exemption may be granted for no
longer than two years from its approval date and may be renewed upon
application for additional two year periods. In accordance with 49
U.S.C. 31136(e) and 31315, each of the 74 applicants has satisfied the
entry conditions for obtaining an exemption from the vision
requirements (64 FR 27027; 64 FR 40404; 64 FR 51568; 64 FR 66962; 66 FR
30502; 66 FR 41654; 66 FR 48504; 67 FR 17102; 68 FR 37197; 68 FR 44837;
68 FR 48989; 68 FR 52811; 68 FR 54775; 68 FR 61860; 69 FR 51346; 70 FR
17504; 70 FR 30997; 70 FR 30999; 70 FR 41811; 70 FR 42615; 70 FR 46567;
70 FR 48797; 70 FR 50799; 70 FR 53412; 70 FR 61165; 70 FR 61493; 71 FR
32183; 71 FR 41310; 71 FR 50970; 72 FR 8417; 72 FR 36099; 72 FR 39879;
72 FR 40359; 72 FR 40360; 72 FR 40362; 72 FR 52419; 72 FR 52421; 72 FR
54971; 72 FR 58359; 72 FR 62896; 73 FR 48269; 73 FR 60398; 74 FR 11988;
74 FR 21427; 74 FR 26461; 74 FR 34074; 74 FR 34394; 74 FR 34395; 74 FR
34630; 74 FR 37295; 74 FR 41971; 74 FR 43217; 74 FR 43221; 74 FR 48343;
74 FR 46069; 74 FR 53581; 74 FR 57551; 75 FR 72863; 76 FR 2190; 76 FR
21796; 76 FR 25766; 76 FR 34135; 76 FR 34136; 76 FR 37168; 76 FR 37885;
76 FR 40445; 76 FR 44652; 76 FR 49528; 76 FR 53708; 76 FR 53710; 76 FR
54530; 76 FR 55463; 76 FR 55465; 76 FR 55467; 76 FR 55469; 76 FR 61143;
76 FR 62143; 76 FR 64171; 76 FR 66123; 76 FR 67246). Each of these 74
applicants has requested renewal of the exemption and has submitted
evidence showing that the vision in the better eye continues to meet
the requirement specified at 49 CFR 391.41(b)(10) and that the vision
impairment is stable. In addition, a review of each record of safety
while driving with the respective vision deficiencies over the past two
years indicates each applicant continues to meet the vision exemption
requirements.
    These factors provide an adequate basis for predicting each
driver's ability to continue to drive safely in interstate commerce.
Therefore, FMCSA concludes that extending the exemption for each
renewal applicant for a period of two years is likely to achieve a
level of safety equal to that existing without the exemption.

Request for Comments

    FMCSA will review comments received at any time concerning a
particular driver's safety record and determine if the continuation of
the exemption is consistent with the requirements at 49 U.S.C. 31136(e)
and 31315. However, FMCSA requests that interested parties with
specific data concerning the safety records of these drivers submit
comments by January 23, 2014.
    FMCSA believes that the requirements for a renewal of an exemption
under 49 U.S.C. 31136(e) and 31315 can be satisfied by initially
granting the renewal and then requesting and evaluating, if needed,
subsequent comments submitted by interested parties. As indicated
above, the Agency previously published notices of final disposition
announcing its decision to exempt these 74 individuals from the vision
requirement

in 49 CFR 391.41(b)(10). The final decision to grant an exemption to
each of these individuals was made on the merits of each case and made
only after careful consideration of the comments received to its
notices of applications. The notices of applications stated in detail
the qualifications, experience, and medical condition of each applicant
for an exemption from the vision requirements. That information is
available by consulting the above cited Federal Register publications.
    Interested parties or organizations possessing information that
would otherwise show that any, or all, of these drivers are not
currently achieving the statutory level of safety should immediately
notify FMCSA. The Agency will evaluate any adverse evidence submitted
and, if safety is being compromised or if continuation of the exemption
would not be consistent with the goals and objectives of 49 U.S.C.
31136(e) and 31315, FMCSA will take immediate steps to revoke the
exemption of a driver.

Submitting Comments

    You may submit your comments and material online or by fax, mail,
or hand delivery, but please use only one of these means. FMCSA
recommends that you include your name and a mailing address, an email
address, or a phone number in the body of your document so that FMCSA
can contact you if there are questions regarding your submission.
    To submit your comment online, go to http://www.regulations.gov and
in the search box insert the docket numbers FMCSA-1999-5748; FMCSA-
2001-9561; FMCSA-2003-15268; FMCSA-2003-15892; FMCSA-2005-20560; FMCSA-
2005-21254; FMCSA-2005-21711; FMCSA-2006-24783; FMCSA-2007-26653;
FMCSA-2007-27897; FMCSA-2009-0054; FMCSA-2009-0121; FMCSA-2009-0154;
FMCSA-2009-0206; FMCSA-2010-0354; FMCSA-2011-0092; FMCSA-2011-0124;
FMCSA-2011-0141; FMCSA-2011-0142; FMCSA-2011-0189 and click the search
button. When the new screen appears, click on the blue ``Comment Now!''
button on the right hand side of the page. On the new page, enter
information required including the specific section of this document to
which each comment applies, and provide a reason for each suggestion or
recommendation. If you submit your comments by mail or hand delivery,
submit them in an unbound format, no larger than 8\1/2\ by 11 inches,
suitable for copying and electronic filing. If you submit comments by
mail and would like to know that they reached the facility, please
enclose a stamped, self-addressed postcard or envelope.
    We will consider all comments and material received during the
comment period and may change this proposed rule based on your
comments. FMCSA may issue a final rule at any time after the close of
the comment period.

Viewing Comments and Documents

    To view comments, as well as any documents mentioned in this
preamble, to submit your comment online, go to http://www.regulations.gov and in the search box insert the docket number
FMCSA-1999-5748; FMCSA-2001-9561; FMCSA-2003-15268; FMCSA-2003-15892;
FMCSA-2005-20560; FMCSA-2005-21254; FMCSA-2005-21711; FMCSA-2006-24783;
FMCSA-2007-26653; FMCSA-2007-27897; FMCSA-2009-0054; FMCSA-2009-0121;
FMCSA-2009-0154; FMCSA-2009-0206; FMCSA-2010-0354; FMCSA-2011-0092;
FMCSA-2011-0124; FMCSA-2011-0141; FMCSA-2011-0142; FMCSA-2011-0189 and
click ``Search.'' Next, click ``Open Docket Folder'' and you will find
all documents and comments related to the proposed rulemaking.

    Issued on: December 17, 2013.
Larry W. Minor,
Associate Administrator for Policy.
[FR Doc. 2013-30715 Filed 12-23-13; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910-EX-P


[Federal Register Volume 84, Number 189 (Monday, September 30, 2019)]
[Notices]
[Page 51692]
[FR Doc No: 2019-21086]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

[SEC File No. 270-91, OMB Control No. 3235-0088]

Submission for OMB Review; Comment Request

Upon Written Request, Copies Available From: Securities and Exchange
Commission, Office of FOIA Services, 100 F Street NE, Washington, DC
20549-2736.

Extension:
    Rule 15Ba2-5

    Notice is hereby given that pursuant to the Paperwork Reduction Act
of 1995 (``PRA'') (44 U.S.C. 3501 et seq.), the Securities and Exchange
Commission (``Commission'') has submitted to the Office of Management
and Budget (``OMB'') a request for approval of extension of the
existing collection of information provided for in Rule 15Ba2-5 (17 CFR
240.15Ba2-5), under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78a
et seq.) (``Exchange Act'').
    On July 7, 1976, effective July 16, 1976 (see 41 FR 28948, July 14,
1976), the Commission adopted Rule 15Ba2-5 under the Exchange Act to
permit a duly-appointed fiduciary to assume immediate responsibility
for the operation of a municipal securities dealer's business. Without
the rule, the fiduciary would not be able to assume operation until it
registered as a municipal securities dealer. Under the rule, the
registration of a municipal securities dealer is deemed to be the
registration of any executor, administrator, guardian, conservator,
assignee for the benefit of creditors, receiver, trustee in insolvency
or bankruptcy, or other fiduciary, appointed or qualified by order,
judgment, or decree of a court of competent jurisdiction to continue
the business of such municipal securities dealer, provided that such
fiduciary files with the Commission, within 30 days after entering upon
the performance of his duties, a statement setting forth as to such
fiduciary substantially the same information required by Form MSD or
Form BD. The statement is necessary to ensure that the Commission and
the public have adequate information about the fiduciary.
    There is approximately 1 respondent per year that requires an
aggregate total of 4 hours to comply with this rule. This respondent
makes an estimated 1 annual response. Each response takes approximately
4 hours to complete. Thus, the total compliance burden per year is 4
burden hours. The approximate internal compliance cost per hour is $20,
resulting in a total internal cost of compliance for the respondent of
approximately $80 (i.e., 4 hours x $20).
    An agency may not conduct or sponsor, and a person is not required
to respond to, a collection of information under the PRA unless it
displays a currently valid OMB control number.
    The public may view background documentation for this information
collection at the following website: www.reginfo.gov. Comments should
be directed to: (i) Desk Officer for the Securities and Exchange
Commission, Office of Information and Regulatory Affairs, Office of
Management and Budget, Room 10102, New Executive Office Building,
Washington, DC 20503, or by sending an email to:
<EMAIL_ADDRESS>and (ii) Charles Riddle, Acting Director/
Chief Information Officer, Securities and Exchange Commission, c/o
Candace Kenner, 100 F Street NE, Washington, DC 20549, or by sending an
email to<EMAIL_ADDRESS>Comments must be submitted to OMB within
30 days of this notice.

    Dated: September 24, 2019.
Jill M. Peterson,
Assistant Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2019-21086 Filed 9-27-19; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 8011-01-P


[Federal Register Volume 79, Number 76 (Monday, April 21, 2014)]
[Notices]
[Pages 22170-22172]
[FR Doc No: 2014-08974]

=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

[Release No. 34-71950; File No. SR-C2-2014-009]

Self-Regulatory Organizations; C2 Options Exchange, Incorporated;
Notice of Filing and Immediate Effectiveness of a Proposed Rule Change
To Amend Its Fees Schedule

April 15, 2014.
    Pursuant to Section 19(b)(1) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934
(the ``Act'') \1\ and Rule 19b-4 thereunder,\2\ notice is hereby given
that on April 4, 2014, C2 Options Exchange, Incorporated (the
``Exchange'' or ``C2'') filed with the Securities and Exchange
Commission (``Commission'') the proposed rule change as described in
Items I, II, and III below, which Items have been prepared by the
Exchange. The Commission is publishing this notice to solicit comments
on the proposed rule change from interested persons.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \1\ 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(1).
    \2\ 17 CFR 240.19b-4.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

I. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement of the Terms of Substance
of the Proposed Rule Change

    C2 Options Exchange, Incorporated (the ``Exchange'' or ``C2'')
proposes to amend its Fees Schedule. The text of the proposed rule
change is available on the Exchange's Web site (http://www.c2exchange.com/Legal/), at the Exchange's Office of the Secretary,
and at the Commission's Public Reference Room.

II. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement of the Purpose of, and
Statutory Basis for, the Proposed Rule Change

    In its filing with the Commission, the Exchange included statements
concerning the purpose of and basis for the proposed rule change and
discussed any comments it received on the proposed rule change. The
text of these statements may be examined at the places specified in
Item IV below. The Exchange has prepared summaries, set forth in
sections A, B, and C below, of the most significant aspects of such
statements.

A. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement of the Purpose of, and
Statutory Basis for, the Proposed Rule Change

1. Purpose
    The Exchange proposes to amend its Fees Schedule. Currently, C2
Market-Maker fees for simple, non-complex orders in equity options
classes (both Penny Pilot classes and non-Penny Pilot classes) are
calculated using a formula.\3\ The maximum fee is $0.85 per contract
($0.085 for mini-options). The Exchange would like to set a standard
fee of $0.40 per contract ($0.04 for mini-options) for C2 Market-Makers
for simple, non-complex orders in Penny Pilot equity options
classes.\4\ This set rate is lower than the maximum fee in order to
encourage quoting in such classes, and would lower the fee paid by C2
Market-Makers trading simple, non-complex orders in Penny Pilot equity
options classes in the majority of transactions.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \3\ Fee = (C2 BBO Market Width at time of execution) x (Market
Participant Rate) x 50*
    * For mini-options, the multiplier will be 5 instead of 50.
    BBO Market Width: Displayed C2 Ask Price--Displayed C2 Bid
Price.
    The Market Participant Rate for C2 Market-Makers is 30%.
    For more information, see C2 Fees Schedule, Section 1B.
    \4\ The Exchange proposes to add the statement ``The above fee
structure calculation does not apply to C2 Market-Makers trading
Penny Pilot options; such C2 Market-Makers will be assessed a fee of
$0.40 per contract ($0.04 for mini-options).''
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    In conjunction with the above proposed change, the Exchange also
proposes to modify the maximum Public Customer Taker Rebate (also for
simple, non-complex orders in equity options classes) for Penny Pilot
options.\5\ Currently, the maximum rebate is $0.75 per contract ($0.075
for mini options), regardless of whether the options being traded are
Penny Pilot classes or non-Penny Pilot classes. The Exchange does not
propose to change this maximum rebate with respect to non-Penny Pilot
options, but does propose to lower the maximum rebate to $0.60 per
contract ($0.06 for mini-options) for Penny Pilot options. Since the
Exchange is setting a fixed maximum fee rate for C2 Market-Makers, the
Exchange desires to ensure that the spread between the maximum fee for
C2 Market-Makers and maximum Public Customer Taker Rebate is not so
large as to become economically imprudent for the Exchange.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \5\ For more information about the Public Customer Taker Rebate,
see C2 Fees Schedule, Section 1B.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    Also in conjunction with the above proposed changes, the Exchange
also proposes to delete from Section 1B the statement that ``For the
BAC, MBI, BBRY, DELL and JCP equity options classes, the maximum fee
will be $0.55 per contract and the maximum rebate will be $0.45 per
contract.'' This will put BAC, MBI, BBRY, DELL and JCP (the ``Special
Classes'') on the same competitive footing, from a fees standpoint, as
all other classes, and the same fees that apply to all other classes
will apply to the Special Classes. Because the Special Classes are all
Penny Pilot classes, C2 Market-Maker fees for such trades will be $0.40
per contract and the maximum Public Customer Taker Rebate for such
trades will be $0.60 per contract.
    The Exchange also proposes to adopt a fee of $50 per month per
login ID for PULSe workstation users that elect to access a COB
Feed.\6\ The COB Feed provides data (which has already been otherwise-
available to PULSe Workstation users) on a data feed that specifically
provides COB data. In order to improve the provision of this COB data,
the Exchange has recently contracted an outside vendor to provide the
COB Feed. The Exchange proposes to assess the new COB Feed Fee in order
to recoup costs associated with the provision of the COB Feed.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \6\ ``COB'' stands for the Exchange's Complex Order Book. For a
more detailed description of the PULSe workstation and its other
functionalities, see, e.g., Securities Exchange Act Release Nos.
63246 (November 4, 2010) 75 FR 69478 (November 12, 2010) (SR-C2-
2010-007), 65279 (September 7, 2011), 76 FR 56824 (September 14,
2011) (SR-C2-2011-020), 65482 (October 4, 2011), 76 FR 62879
(October 11, 2011) (SR-C2-2011-028), and 69991 (July 16, 2013), 78
FR 43956 (July 22, 2013) (SR-C2-2013-026).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

2. Statutory Basis
    The Exchange believes the proposed rule change is consistent with
the Act and the rules and regulations thereunder applicable to the
Exchange and, in particular, the requirements of Section 6(b) of the
Act.\7\ Specifically, the Exchange believes the proposed rule change is
consistent with Section 6(b)(4)

of the Act,\8\ which requires that Exchange rules provide for the
equitable allocation of reasonable dues, fees, and other charges among
its Trading Permit Holders and other persons using its facilities. The
Exchange believes the proposed change to the C2 Market-Maker fee for
simple, non-complex orders in Penny Pilot equity options classes is
reasonable because, in most transactions, it would lower the fee paid
by C2 Market-Makers trading simple, non-complex orders in Penny Pilot
equity options classes (and would lower the maximum fee for such
transactions from $0.85 per contract to $0.40 per contract (and from
$0.085 to $0.04 for mini-options)). The Exchange believes that the
proposed change is equitable and not unfairly discriminatory because it
will apply to all C2 Market-Makers, and C2 Market-Makers take on
certain obligations, such as quoting obligations, that other market
participants do not have.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \7\ 15 U.S.C. 78f(b).
    \8\ 15 U.S.C. 78f(b)(4).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    The Exchange believes that the proposed change to the Public
Customer Taker Rebate for simple, non-complex orders in Penny Pilot
equity options classes is reasonable because Public Customers Taking
liquidity in those Penny Pilot classes will still receive a rebate
(instead of paying a fee). The Exchange believes that the proposed
change is equitable and not unfairly discriminatory because it will
apply to all Public Customer Takers. While the proposed change will
lower the Public Customer Taker Rebate, Public Customers will still be
the only market participants that receive said rebate. This is
equitable and not unfairly discriminatory because the options industry
has a long history of providing preferential pricing to Public
Customers in order to encourage Public Customer trading, which benefits
other market participants (who prefer to trade with Public Customers).
Further, Public Customers often have less sophisticated trading systems
and apparatuses than other market participants.
    The Exchange believes that it is equitable and not unfairly
discriminatory to offer different pricing for Penny Pilot and non-Penny
Pilot options because Penny Pilot options and non-Penny Pilot options
offer different pricing, liquidity, spread and trading incentives. The
spreads in Penny Pilot options are tighter than those in non-Penny
Pilot options (which trade in $0.05 and $0.10 increments). Further, a
number of options exchanges offer different pricing for Penny Pilot and
non-Penny Pilot options.
    The Exchange believes that eliminating separate pricing for the
Special Classes is reasonable, equitable and not unfairly
discriminatory because this will place the Special Classes on the same
competitive footing, from a pricing standpoint, as all other Penny
Pilot classes, and the same pricing that applies to all other Penny
Pilot classes will apply to the Special Classes.
    The Exchange believes that the COB Feed Fee is reasonable because,
in order to improve the provision of this COB data, the Exchange has
recently contracted an outside vendor to provide the COB Feed, and the
new COB Feed Fee will help serve to recoup costs associated with the
provision of the COB Feed. The Exchange believes the COB Feed Fee is
equitable and not unfairly discriminatory because it will be assessed
equally to all PULSe workstation users that request the COB Feed.

B. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement on Burden on Competition

    C2 does not believe that the proposed rule changes will impose any
burden on intramarket competition that is not necessary or appropriate
in furtherance of the purposes of the Act because the proposed changes
regarding C2 Market-Maker pricing will apply to all C2 Market-Makers,
and C2 Market-Makers take on certain obligations, such as quoting
obligations, that other market participants do not have. The proposed
changes regarding the Public Customer Taker Rebate will apply to all
Public Customers. While the proposed change will lower the Public
Customer Taker Rebate, Public Customers will still be the only market
participants that receive said rebate. This is not a burden on
intramarket competition that is not necessary or appropriate in
furtherance of the purposes of the Act because the options industry has
a long history of providing preferential pricing to Public Customers in
order to encourage Public Customer trading, which benefits other market
participants (who prefer to trade with Public Customers). Further,
Public Customers often have less sophisticated trading systems and
apparatuses than other market participants. The COB Feed Fee will be
assessed to all PULSe workstation users who request the COB Feed. C2
does not believe that the proposed rule changes will impose any burden
on intermarket competition that is not necessary or appropriate in
furtherance of the purposes of the Act because the proposed changes are
intended to encourage trading on C2 and make C2 a more competitive
market (and may encourage more competitive pricing from other
exchanges). To the extent that the proposed changes make C2 a more
attractive market for market participants at other exchanges, such
market participants may elect to become C2 market participants. The
proposed change only affects trading on C2.

C. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement on Comments on the Proposed
Rule Change Received From Members, Participants, or Others

    The Exchange neither solicited nor received comments on the
proposed rule change.

III. Date of Effectiveness of the Proposed Rule Change and Timing for
Commission Action

    The foregoing rule change has become effective pursuant to Section
19(b)(3)(A) of the Act \9\ and paragraph (f) of Rule 19b-4 \10\
thereunder. At any time within 60 days of the filing of the proposed
rule change, the Commission summarily may temporarily suspend such rule
change if it appears to the Commission that such action is necessary or
appropriate in the public interest, for the protection of investors, or
otherwise in furtherance of the purposes of the Act. If the Commission
takes such action, the Commission will institute proceedings to
determine whether the proposed rule change should be approved or
disapproved.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \9\ 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(3)(A).
    \10\ 17 CFR 240.19b-4(f).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

IV. Solicitation of Comments

    Interested persons are invited to submit written data, views, and
arguments concerning the foregoing, including whether the proposed rule
change is consistent with the Act. Comments may be submitted by any of
the following methods:

Electronic Comments

     Use the Commission's Internet comment form (http://www.sec.gov/rules/sro.shtml); or
     Send an email to<EMAIL_ADDRESS>Please include
File Number SR-C2-2014-009 on the subject line.

Paper Comments

     Send paper comments in triplicate to Secretary, Securities
and Exchange Commission, 100 F Street NE., Washington, DC 20549-1090.

All submissions should refer to File Number SR-C2-2014-009. This file
number should be included on the subject line if email is used. To help
the Commission process and review your comments more efficiently,
please use only one method. The Commission will post all comments on
the Commission's

Internet Web site (http://www.sec.gov/rules/sro.shtml). Copies of the
submission, all subsequent amendments, all written statements with
respect to the proposed rule change that are filed with the Commission,
and all written communications relating to the proposed rule change
between the Commission and any person, other than those that may be
withheld from the public in accordance with the provisions of 5 U.S.C.
552, will be available for Web site viewing and printing in the
Commission's Public Reference Room, 100 F Street NE., Washington, DC
20549, on official business days between the hours of 10:00 a.m. and
3:00 p.m. Copies of such filing also will be available for inspection
and copying at the principal office of the Exchange. All comments
received will be posted without change; the Commission does not edit
personal identifying information from submissions. You should submit
only information that you wish to make publicly available. All
submissions should refer to File Number SR-C2-2014-009 and should be
submitted on or before May 12, 2014.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \11\ 17 CFR 200.30-3(a)(12).

    For the Commission, by the Division of Trading and Markets,
pursuant to delegated authority.\11\
Kevin M. O'Neill,
Deputy Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2014-08974 Filed 4-18-14; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 8011-01-P


[Federal Register: October 29, 2007 (Volume 72, Number 208)]
[Notices]
[Page 61203-61204]
[DOCID:fr29oc07-111]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION

Federal Aviation Administration

Notice of Intent To Rule on Request To Release Airport Property
at Klamath Falls Airport, Klamath Falls, OR

AGENCY: Federal Aviation Administration (FAA), DOT.

ACTION:  Notice of request to release airport property.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The FAA proposes to rule and invites public comment on the
release of land at Klamath Falls Airport under the provisions of
Section 125 of the Wendell H. Ford Aviation Investment Reform Act for
the 21st Century (AIR 21), now 49 U.S.C. 47107(h)(2).

DATES: Comments must be received on or before November 28, 2007.

ADDRESSES: Comments on this application may be mailed or delivered to
the FAA at the following address: Federal Aviation Administration,
Northwest Mountain Region, Airports Division, Seattle Airports District
Office, 1601 Lind Avenue, SW., Suite 250, Renton, Washington 98057-
3356.
    In addition, one copy of any comments submitted to the FAA must be
mailed or delivered to Mr. Derek Martin, Airport Director, at the
following address: Klamath Falls Airport, 6775 Arnold Avenue, Klamath
Falls, OR 97603.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Ms. Trang D. Tran, Civil Engineer,
Federal Aviation Administration, Northwest Mountain Region, Seattle
Airports District Office, 1601 Lind Avenue, SW., Suite 250, Renton,
Washington 98057-3356.
    The request to release property may be reviewed, by appointment, in
person at this same location.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The FAA invites public comment on the
request to release property at the Klamath Falls Airport under the
provisions of the AIR 21 (49 U.S.C. 47107(h)(2)).
    On October 16, 2007, the FAA determined that the request to release
property at Klamath Falls Airport submitted by the airport meets the
procedural requirements of the Federal Aviation Administration. The FAA
may approve the request, in whole or in part, no later than November
28, 2007.
    The following is a brief overview of the request: Klamath Falls
Airport is proposing the release of approximately 7.89 acres of airport
property to the State of Oregon. The revenue generated from the land
release will be used to fund Airport Improvement Projects.
    Any person may inspect, by appointment, the request in person at

the FAA office listed above under FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT.
    In addition, any person may, upon appointment and request, inspect
the application, notice and other documents germane to the application
in person at Klamath Falls Airport.

    Dated: Issued in Renton, Washington on October 16, 2007.
Trang D. Tran,
Seattle Airports District Office.
[FR Doc. 07-5321 Filed 10-26-07; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4910-13-M