                        INFORMATION COLLECTION REQUEST
                                      for
                     GREEN POWER PARTNERSHIP AND COMBINED
                          HEAT AND POWER PARTNERSHIP

                            EPA ICR NUMBER 2173.07

                         OMB CONTROL NUMBER 2060-0578

                                 Prepared by:
                     U.S. Environmental Protection Agency
                          Office of Air and Radiation
                    Climate Protection Partnership Division

                            SUPPORTING STATEMENT A
1.	IDENTIFICATION OF THE INFORMATION COLLECTION
 	1(a)	Title and Number of the Information Collection Request
 EPA's Green Power Partnership (GPP) and Combined Heat and Power (CHP) Partnership (Renewal) EPA ICR No. 2173.07, OMB Control No. 2060-0578.
 	1(b)	Short Characterization/Abstract
 	In 2002, EPA's Energy Supply and Industry Branch (ESIB) launched two partnership programs with industry and other stakeholders: the Green Power Partnership (GPP) and the Combined Heat and Power Partnership (CHPP). These voluntary partnership programs, along with others in the ESIB, encourage organizations to invest in clean, efficient energy technologies, including renewable energy and combined heat and power.  To continue to be successful, it is critical that EPA collect information from these program stakeholders to ensure these organizations are meeting their clean energy goals and to assure the credibility of these voluntary non-regulatory programs.
 	EPA has developed this ICR to obtain authorization to collect information from organizations participating in the GPP and CHPP, and other ESIB programs.  Organizations that join these programs voluntarily agree to the following respective actions: (1) designating a GPP or CHPP liaison and filling out a Partnership Agreement or Letter of Intent (LOI) respectively; (2) for the GPP, reporting to EPA, on a annual basis, their progress toward their green power commitment via a 2-page reporting form; (3) for the CHPP, reporting to EPA information on their existing CHP projects, new project development and other CHP-related activities.  In addition to these actions, organizations may voluntarily apply for recognition to the programs' established annual recognition events, which require submitting additional information.  EPA uses the data obtained from its Partners to assess the success of these programs in achieving their national energy and greenhouse gas (GHG) reduction goals.  Partners are organizational entities that have volunteered to participate in either Partnership program.
 2.	NEED FOR AND USE OF THIS COLLECTION
 		2(a)	Need/Authority for the Collection
 	EPA needs to collect the information in the Partnership Agreement or LOI to formally establish participation in the GPP or CHPP program and to obtain general information about new Partners.  Additional information collected through information forms is needed to allow EPA to track Partner progress toward meeting their commitments, and to enable the programs to facilitate and provide assistance to encourage green power use and the implementation of CHP projects, and to assess whether actions are worthy of recognition, and to determine progress in meeting the programs' national energy and GHG reduction goals.  This information collection will assist ESIB programs, such as helping the GPP increase demand for the green power use thereby reducing GHG emissions and helping the CHPP increase the use of more efficient power generation and reduce GHG emissions.
 	Participation in the ESIB's programs is voluntary.  Program participants agree to provide EPA with the requested information.
 	2(b)	Practical Utility/Users of the Data
 	EPA uses the information submitted in the Partnership Agreement or LOI to update its databases of GPP or CHPP Partners.  The databases serve as a source of general information and a contact list.  EPA uses the information submitted in additional forms to monitor the progress of current participation and projects and identify new opportunities.  EPA also uses the data to prepare reports on GPP and CHP projects and progress as well as to determine the GHG reductions achieved by the programs.  EPA uses case studies of successful CHP projects to demonstrate to existing and potential Partners the cost savings and environmental benefits associated with more efficient energy production through CHP projects.  General information on the Partners, green power, and CHP is also provided on the respective Web sites, making it available to other Partners as well as the public.
 3.	NONDUPLICATION, CONSULTATIONS, AND OTHER COLLECTION CRITERIA
 	3(a)	Nonduplication
 	For new Partners, the information to be collected has not previously been collected by EPA or any other Federal Agency.  Existing GPP Partners provide updates to existing information through a Partner Yearly Report.  Existing CHPP Partners with ongoing CHP project development activities review and update a CHPP Partners Project Data Form every year.  Some CHPP Partners, such as certain end-users and city/state programs, have no annual reporting requirements.
 	For existing Partners with both programs, some of the information required is available in the existing databases from previous submittals.  To avoid requesting information that has already been collected, forms sent to existing Partners are pre-populated with previously submitted information from the database.  Recipients of the forms are asked to review the information provided.  Only if the information is incorrect or out of date will the recipients be required to provide updated or additional information.  To further reduce burden, EPA provides CHPP Partners who have ongoing project development activities with a simple spreadsheet of previously submitted project data that they can review and revise electronically rather than filling out a form.
 	3(b)	Public Notice Required Prior to ICR Submission to OMB
 	On September 14, 2018, EPA issued a Federal Register notice soliciting public comments on the ICR through an announcement in the Federal Register contained in docket number EPA-HQ-OAR-2004-0501.  EPA received no comments during the 2 months the docket was open.
        3(c)	Consultations
 	EPA consulted with three Green Power Partnership partners and three CHP Partnership partners regarding the burden of information collection for the programs during the previous ICR submission in 2004, 2008, 2011, and 2014.  There has not been any changes to the documents since the last submission so the estimate burden per partner has remained the same.
       In 2004, EPA consulted with three GPP Partners and three CHPP Partners regarding the burden of information collection for the programs.  The contacted Partners were provided copies of the information collection forms, and asked to provide estimates of the associated hourly labor burden.  Labor wage rates from the Bureau of Labor Statistics (BLS) were provided for reference and EPA requested comments on whether these labor rates were appropriate.  The Partners all provided labor hour estimates of each activity, and either provided labor rates or indicated that the BLS rates were representative.  Generally, the estimates provided by the Partners were similar and were consistent with EPA expectations of the labor burden.
 	In 2008, EPA consulted with three GPP Partners and three CHPP Partners regarding the burden of this information collection.  The contacted Partners were provided copies of the information collection forms, estimates of the labor burden derived from Partners responses in 2004, and labor wage rates from the Bureau of Labor Statistics (BLS).  EPA requested comments on whether the labor burden estimates and labor rates were appropriate.  Generally, the estimates provided by the Partners were similar and were consistent with the estimates provided by EPA. EPA averaged Partner responses for the labor burden estimates and labor rates for use in this ICR renewal.
 	In 2011, EPA consulted with three GPP Partners and three CHPP Partners regarding the burden of this information collection.  The contacted Partners were provided copies of the information collection forms, estimates of the labor burden derived from Partners responses in 2008, and labor wage rates from the Bureau of Labor Statistics (BLS).  EPA requested comments on whether the labor burden estimates and labor rates were appropriate.  Generally, the estimates provided by the Partners were similar and were consistent with the estimates provided by EPA. EPA averaged Partner responses for the labor burden estimates and labor rates for use in this ICR renewal.
       In 2014, EPA consulted with three GPP Partners and three CHPP Partners regarding the burden of this information collection.  The contacted Partners were provided copies of the information collection forms, estimates of the labor burden derived from Partners responses in 2011, and labor wage rates from the Bureau of Labor Statistics (BLS).  EPA requested comments on whether the labor burden estimates and labor rates were appropriate.  Generally, the estimates provided by the Partners were similar and were consistent with the estimates provided by EPA. EPA averaged Partner responses for the labor burden estimates and labor rates for use in this ICR renewal.

 	3(d)	Effects of Less Frequent Collection
 	The Partnership Agreement or LOI are submitted once by organizations that choose to become Partners of the GPP or CHPP.  To allow EPA to remain current on Partner participation and determine if green power purchase commitments are being met, GPP Partners will be asked to update an annual report.  All CHPP Partners with ongoing project development activities, including all project developers, energy service companies, consulting engineers, equipment manufacturers, and approximately 33% of utility Partners will review their project information and provide updates every year.  These differences in reporting requirements reflect the varying dynamics of the data contained in the reports for the different subcategories of Partners.  Partners of both programs may also update company and contact information periodically via the respective partnership Web sites.  EPA believes that any reduction in the frequency of this information collection would impede efforts by EPA to evaluate results of the programs, facilitate green power purchases and CHP project implementation, and respond in a timely manner to needs of the Partners.
       3(e)	General Guidelines
 	This information collection request was prepared in compliance with OMB's and EPA's guidelines for ICR preparation.
 	3(f)	Confidentiality
 	Participation in the GPP and CHPP is voluntary.  Participants are not asked to reveal Confidential Business Information (CBI).  Additionally, participants will be given specific instructions not to provide any information that they consider confidential.
       3(g)	Sensitive Questions
 	No questions of a sensitive nature are asked in any of the forms or periodic information updates.
 4.	THE RESPONDENTS AND THE INFORMATION REQUESTED
 	4(a)	Respondent NAICS/SIC Codes
 	This information collection will encompass a wide variety of respondents with most respondents specific to either the GPP or CHPP.
       (i)	GPP Respondent NAICS/SIC codes
 	The GPP Partners consist of company, institutional, and public sector organizations that pledge to purchase a proportion of their annual purchased electricity use from eligible renewable energy resources through one of three purchasing options.  Companies include both service and goods providing industries, institutions are comprised of institutes of higher education and NGOs, and public sector Partners are local, state, or federal level government agencies.

 NAICS
 SIC
 Description
 Full-scale Partners [a]
 611310
 8221
 Colleges, Universities, and Professional Schools
 722110
 5812 5461
 Restaurants
 423390
 5093
 Automobile Manufacturing
 445110
 5411
 Grocery Stores
 323110
 2752
 Print shops
 621111
 8093
 Offices of Physicians
 924
 9511
 Public Administration of Environmental Quality Programs
 92411
 9631
 Public Administration of Air and Water Resource and Solid Waste Management Programs
 928110
 9711
 Military bases and camps
 927110
 9661
 Public Administration of Space Research and Technology
 [a]Given the breadth of industries who are currently GPP Partners, only a subset of their NAICS/SIC codes is listed to provide examples.

 	(ii)	CHPP Respondent NAICS/SIC codes
 	The CHPP classifies its Partners into ten categories.  State, Local and Tribal Partners include state and local energy, environmental, and economic development agencies who will promote CHP development in their area.  The remaining nine categories are included in the commercial and institutional Partner group.  End-user Partners are comprised of a broad range of industrial, commercial, or institutional organizations who utilize CHP technology to provide heat and electricity at their facilities.  Equipment suppliers are involved in the manufacturing, supplying, or installation of CHP-related products.  Other Partner categories can be classified as CHP project promoters and facilitators who work to create new CHP projects.  These Partners include energy services companies (ESCOs), attorneys, CHP project developers, non-government organizations (NGOs), financiers, and engineering consultants.  Utility Partners work to provide end-users with fuel for their CHP projects or work to distribute electricity from CHP sources.  The following list provides the most common NAICS/SIC codes for the various different types of CHPP Partners:

 NAICS
 SIC
 Description
 State/Local/Tribal Partners
 92613
 9631
 Public Administration, Regulation and Administration of Communications, Electric, Gas, and Other Utilities
 926130
 9631
 Public Administration, Energy development and conservation programs
 9611
 9611
 Public Administration of General Economic Programs
 924
 9511
 Public Administration of Environmental Quality Programs
 Equipment Manufacturers
 333611
 3511
 Turbine and turbine generator manufacturing
 335999
 3699
 Fuel cells, electrochemical generators, manufacturing
 541512
 7373
 Information management computer systems integration design services
 541614
 8742
 Manufacturing operations improvement consulting services
 CHP project promoters and facilitators
 541110
 8111
 Offices of Lawyers
 541690
 8999
 Energy consulting services
 541330
 8999
 Engineering consulting services
 523910
 6153 6211 6799
 Financial Investments and Related Activities, Miscellaneous Intermediation
 Utilities
 221122
 4911
 Electric Power Distribution
 221210
 4923
 Natural Gas Distribution
 End-Users[a]
 325415
 2834
 Pharmaceutical Preparation Manufacturing
 611310
 8221
 Colleges, Universities, and Professional Schools
 322121
 2611 2621
 Pulp and Paper Mills  (Except Newsprint Mills)
 336111
 3711
 Automobile Manufacturing
 813110
 8661
 Religious Organizations
 331111
 3317
  Steel Mills
 721110
 7011
 Hotels (Except Casino Hotels) and Motels
 [a] There is a wide variety of entities that could install CHP projects and become CHP end users.  Any facility with a demand for both electricity and thermal energy (i.e., steam, heating, or cooling) during most of the year and with access to fuels is a potential candidate for a CHPP end-user Partner.  For this reason, only a subset of the end-users is listed to provide examples.

 	4(b)	Information Requested
       (i)	Data Items, Including Recordkeeping Requirements
 	GPP.  Information will be collected through the Partnership Agreement and Partner Yearly Report, as well as through clarification follow-ups and calls or e-mails as needed.  Each activity is described below.

 The Partnership Agreement requests the following information from all Partners:
       Organization name;
       Scope of entity/entities joining Partnership;
       Total purchased electricity use and green power purchase commitment;
       Signature and printed name and title of authorized organization representative;
       Contact information about the organizational liaison to the GPP, including name, title address, phone number, fax number and e-mail address;
       Purchase details such as retailer name, the type of green power product delivered (utility product, renewable energy certificates, or on-site generation), type of renewable resource; and
       Questions about product certification status and contract dates.

 The GPP Partner Yearly Reports collect or update the following information:
       Updates to liaison information listed above;
       Updates to commitment details, including total annual energy consumption, annual green power commitment;
       Updates purchase details such as retailer name, the type of green power product delivered (utility product, renewable energy certificates, or on-site generation), type of renewable resource;
       Updates to product certification status and contract dates; and
       Short paragraph description of Partner's Green Power Commitment.

 The GPP award application collects or updates the following information:
       Updates to liaison information listed above;
       Updates to commitment details, including total annual energy consumption, annual green power commitment;
       Updates purchase details such as retailer name, the type of green power product delivered (utility product, renewable energy certificates, or on-site generation), type of renewable resource;
       Updates to product certification status and contract dates; and
       Short paragraphs description of Partner's green power use and projects plus a description of the organization's communication and stakeholder activities in relations to their green power use.

 	A company profile will be available on the GPP Web site.  Partners may submit corrections or updates to their profile via the Web site or electronically at any time.  EPA will also place follow-up calls to clarify any unclear information submitted by Partners.
 	Occasionally, EPA may request technical information in addition to the standard forms.  This information will be requested on a voluntary basis from a subset of GPP Partners.  For instance, information may be requested from the twenty-five largest green power purchasers in order to feature them on the GPP Web site.  Requested information may also be used to target communications and outreach efforts more effectively.

       CHPP.  Information will be collected through the LOI and the CHPP Partners Project Data Form, as well as through clarification follow-up calls or e-mails as needed.  The LOI requests the following information from all new Partners:
       Organization name;
       Designated CHPP Partner Liaison's contact information;
       Organization CHP-related service or activity; and
       Organization web site address and/or CHP-related Web page.

 CHPP Partners Project Data Forms are used to collect information on completed or planned CHP projects on a yearly basis, and will be completed by company or institutional Partners involved in planned or operational CHP projects.  The requested information includes:
       Project Owner;
       Project Name and address;
       Project information including start-up date, fuel type, annual operating hours, average net power output, percentage of electricity sold offsite or to grid and percentage of thermal output sold offsite;
       List of each prime mover, including size, fuels and emission controls;
       Types and applications of thermal output;
       Contact information including the company name, contact name, phone number and date submitted; and
       Project team information including the engineer, prime contractor, project developer and thermal host.

 CHPP Partners award forms are used to collect information on completed or planned CHP projects on an annual basis, and will be completed by company or institutional Partners involved in planned or operational CHP projects seeking additional recognition.  The requested information includes:
       Project Owner;
       Project Name and address;
       Project information including start-up date, fuel type, annual operating hours, average net power output, percentage of electricity sold offsite or to grid and percentage of thermal output sold offsite;
       List of each prime mover, including size, fuels and emission controls;
       Types and applications of thermal output;
       Contact information including the company name, contact name, phone number and date submitted; and
       Project team information including the engineer, prime contractor, project developer and thermal host.

 	After the first submittal, EPA will send the Partner spreadsheets containing all previously-submitted information on planned projects for the Partner to review annually.
 	A company profile and contact information will be available on the CHPP Partnership Web site.  Partners may submit corrections or updates via the Web site at any time.  EPA will also place follow-up calls to clarify any unclear information submitted by Partners.
 	Participation in GPP and CHPP does not require any records to be kept, although Partners will likely keep file copies of the LOI and CHPP Partner Projects Data information forms submitted to EPA.

   The Partnership Agreement form will be updated by removing the approval expiration date, which is currently located in the top right corner of the form.

   The Partnership Agreement form statement regarding the one year length of time the green power purchase must be completed by will be updated to read as follows: "Buy green power that meets or exceeds Partnership requirements within six months of signing this Partnership Agreement."
 	(ii)	Respondent Activities
 	The respondent activities depend on the aspect of the information collection to which they are responding.  In completing the Partnership Agreement or LOI, respondents will:
       Review the form;
       Complete the form;
       Sign and submit the form electronically or via fax or mail to EPA; and
       File a copy of the form.

 In completing the pre-populated GPP Partner Yearly Report or the pre-populated CHPP Partner Projects Data Form, respondents will:
       Read the forms and instructions;
       Update the pre-populated report or form with new information where necessary;
       Submit the yearly report (or CHP project spreadsheet) electronically or via fax or mail to EPA; and
       File a copy of the form.

 In replying to or initiating an information update or clarification, respondents will:

       Gather information, and provide information to the GPP or CHPP via the Web site, an e-mail, or a telephone interview.

 5.	THE INFORMATION COLLECTED - AGENCY ACTIVITIES, COLLECTION 	METHODOLOGY, AND INFORMATION MANAGEMENT
 	5(a)	Agency Activities
 	(i)	Agency Activities for the GPP's Partnership Agreements and CHPP LOIs
 	Agency activities associated with this information collection depend on the aspect of the information collection that the Agency has received.  In receiving the Partnership Agreement or LOI for either the GPP or CHPP, the Agency will:

       Review the information provided;
       Enter the information into a database; and
       File the form.
 	(ii)	Agency Activities for GPP
 	Agency activities specific to the GPP will depend on the types of activities the Agency will initiate and receive.  In requesting and receiving the information through a Partner Yearly Report Form sent to Partners one year after they join the Partnership and annually thereafter, the Agency will:
       Prepare pre-populated partner data and mail the Partner Yearly Report annually;
       Receive and review the information provided on completed forms;
       Enter the information into a database; and
       File the form.

 In initiating information updates and follow-ups, the Agency will:

       Call or email Partners;
       Request updated information or clarification on Partnership Agreements or Partner Yearly Report Forms by telephone or e-mail;
       Request additional technical information, as needed, from a subset of GPP Partners; and
       Revise data in the database based on these updates.

 In receiving information updates via the Web site, the Agency will:

       Review the data received through the GPP Web site; and
       Revise data in the database based on the updates.

 	(iii)	Agency Activities for CHPP
 	Agency activities specific to the CHPP will also depend on the types of activities the Agency will initiate and receive.  In requesting and receiving the information on CHP projects through an information form sent to Partners within the same year they join the Partnership, the Agency will:

       Prepare and e-mail the CHPP Partner Projects Data Forms;
       Receive and review the information provided on completed forms;
       Enter the information into a database; and
       File the form.

 	In requesting and receiving information on ongoing project development activities through a CHP project spreadsheet already populated with information provided on a Partner's initial project reporting form or most recent project spreadsheet, the Agency will, once a year:
       Populate the Partners' spreadsheets with the project information from the most recent project forms or spreadsheets, which is contained in the CHP project database;
       Email the pre-populated spreadsheets to the appropriate Partners;
       Receive and review any updates provided from the Partner on the spreadsheet;
       Enter updated information from the spreadsheet into a database; and
       File the spreadsheet.

 In initiating information updates and follow-ups, the Agency will:

       Call or email Partners;
       Request updated information or clarification on CHPP Partner Projects Data Forms; and
       Revise data in the database based on the updates.

 In receiving information updates via the Web site, the Agency will:

       Review the data received on the CHPP Web site; and
       Revise data in the database based on the updates.

 	5(b)	Collection Methodology and Management
 	The methods selected for this information collection are chosen based on efficiency and minimization of burden for respondents and EPA.  The respective Partnership Agreement and LOI can be downloaded from the appropriate Web site and returned to EPA either by fax or mail, or submitted electronically.  General Partner information will be posted on the GPP or CHPP Web site where it can be reviewed for accuracy by the Partners and revised if necessary.  Information forms will be available for Partners electronically on each Web site and can be returned by fax, mail, or e-mail.  In addition, the GPP will send pre-populated Yearly Reports to Partners each year containing the information previously submitted.  Partners need only review the information for accuracy and submit any updates, thus minimizing the burden of the respondents.  To further reduce burden, EPA will provide CHPP Partners who have ongoing project development activities with a simple spreadsheet of previously submitted project data that they can review and revise electronically rather than filling out a form.  All information received through the forms (electronically or via hard copy) will be reviewed by EPA before being entered into the database.
 	5(c)	Small Entity Flexibility
 	EPA expects that some GPP Partners and CHPP Partners are small entities.  EPA has designed its approach for this information collection to minimize burden for all respondents while obtaining sufficient and accurate information.  The data requested includes only the most critical information and may be submitted electronically.  As discussed above, for both Partnership programs EPA pre-populates Yearly Report forms or spreadsheets with information previously submitted to avoid duplication of effort and minimize the burden for respondents.  Additionally, participation in GPP and CHPP is voluntary.  Any small entity that finds the information collection overly burdensome is not required to participate.
       EPA expects that some GPP partners are small entities.  GPP determined whether Local Government Partners are small entities based on the population served by these government agencies.  Approximately 30 percent of existing Local Government Partners are in cities or counties with populations less than 50,000, which is the threshold for small entities within the public administration sector.  GPP assumed that all State Government Partners are not classified as small entities, since each State population is greater than 50,000.  Likewise, GPP assumed that all Federal Government Partners are not small entities.
       Given the large number of private sector GPP partners, EPA was not able to review the small entity status of each Partner individually.  GPP assumed that all companies on Fortune magazine's list of the top 1,000 U.S. companies by revenue are not small entities.  GPP also assumed that all non-profit organizations are classified as small entities.  For the remaining private sector Partners, GPP determined the small entity status of a portion of Partners, following the U.S. Small Business Administration's 2007 Table of Small Business Size Standards Matched to North American Industry Classification System Codes.  GPP reviewed company profiles and Web sites when available to help determine the selected company's small entity status.  GPP then compared the company's small entity status to their total electricity use, a figure which EPA collects for all Partners.
       Using this information, EPA determined an approximate electricity base load under which a company could reasonably be considered a small entity.  This base load was different for companies in manufacturing industries than for companies in non-manufacturing industries.  The companies whose small entity status was not determined were assumed to follow a similar correlation to those reviewed.  Following this assumption, EPA estimates that 65 percent of its private sector Partners are small entities.  Overall, 60 percent of all GPP Partners are estimated to be small entities.
       EPA has designed its approach for this information collection to minimize the burden for all respondents while obtaining sufficient and accurate information.  Since the previous ICR, GPP has strived to lessen the reporting burden on Partners by introducing reporting efficiencies, such as a writeable Portable Document Format (PDF) version of the Partnership Agreement that improves readability, and thereby reduces the frequency of Agency follow up with Partners.
       EPA expects that some CHPP Partners are small entities. The CHPP consists of the following partner categories: project developer; consultant/engineering; energy service company (ESCO); financier; utility; non-governmental organization (NGO); government; equipment manufacturer; and end-user. The CHPP assumed that all utilities, government partners, equipment manufacturers, and end-users are not small businesses.  Companies of these partner types are large in scale and scope and are most likely not small businesses.
       The CHPP assumed that all NGO partners are small businesses given they typically have a small number of employees and typically do not work for profit.
       For project developer partners, the CHPP reviewed Web sites and organization descriptions for 25 percent of the partners.  The companies whose Web sites were not reviewed were assumed to contain a similar percentage of small businesses to those reviewed.  For the 25 percent of partners reviewed, the CHPP also evaluated the number of projects developed by these partners as an additional gauge of whether the project developer is a small business or not.  In most cases, if the project developer reviewed by the CHPP had zero projects, it was assumed to be a small business.  The CHPP estimates that 20 percent of the project developer partners are small businesses.
       For consultant/engineer partners, the CHPP reviewed Web sites and organization descriptions for 25 percent of the partners.  The companies whose Web sites were not reviewed were assumed to contain a similar percentage of small businesses to those reviewed.  For the 25 percent of partners reviewed, the CHPP also evaluated the number of projects developed by these partners as an additional gauge of whether the consultant/engineer is a small business or not.  In most cases, if the consultant/engineer reviewed by the CHPP had zero projects, it was assumed to be a small business.  CHPP estimates that 23 percent of the consultant/engineer partners are small businesses.
       For ESCO partners, the CHPP reviewed Web sites and organization descriptions for all of the partners.  CHPP estimates at 15 percent of the ESCO partners are small businesses.
       For financier partners, the CHPP reviewed Web sites and organization descriptions for all of the partners.  CHPP estimates at 18 percent of the financier partners are small businesses..
       Table 1 summarizes the small entities affected per year according to partner category.  The numbers in Table 1 reflect the CHPP's assumption that the distribution of small entities within each new partner category over the years 2011-2014 will be similar to the distribution analyzed for each existing partner category.
     Table 1: CHPP Estimate of Small Entities for Each Respondent Category
Respondent Category
New
Existing
Project Developer*
4
12
Consultant/Engineer*
5
12
ESCO**
0
1
Financier**
0
2
NGO**
0
19
Utility*
0
0
Government*
0
0
Equipment Manufacturer*
0
0
End-User*
0
0
Total
9
46
* The CHPP ICR burden estimate assumes the following number of new partners for each of the years 2009-2011: project developer  -  7; consultant/engineer  - 7; utility  -  6; government  -  2; equipment manufacturer  -  6; end-user  -  6 (Note: the CHPP assumed that none of the existing or new utility, government, equipment manufacturer, or end-user partners are small businesses).
** The CHPP ICR burden estimate assumes that there will be no new ESCO, financier, or NGO partners in years 2009-2011.
       5(d)	Collection Schedule
 	EPA will collect general information from all new Partners through either the GPP's Partnership Agreement or CHPP's LOI, which is completed and submitted by each Partner upon their agreement to participate in the program.  In addition, GPP Partners will be asked to complete a Partner Yearly Report on an annual basis on the anniversary of EPA's receipt of the Partner's last information update.  In addition, a subset of GPP Partners may occasionally be asked to provide additional information specific to their industry sector or to an aspect of the GPP program.  Company and institutional CHPP Partners with operational projects will fill out a Partner Projects Data Form one time for each operational project.  Certain CHPP Partners with ongoing project development activities will be asked to review and update a project data spreadsheet every year.

 6.	ESTIMATING THE BURDEN AND COST OF THE COLLECTION
 	6(a)	Estimating Respondent Burden
       As previously noted, EPA has reviewed the existing burden and cost estimates of the collection and they have remained the same since the last ICR renewal.  In 2014 EPA consulted with six Partners (respondents) from the GPP and the CHPP to obtain accurate hourly burden and cost estimates.  These responses were averaged to estimate the hourly burden for each activity and the labor rates.  In consulting with Partners, EPA provided them with hourly burden estimates from the last submitted ICR, as well as current labor rates from the Bureau of Labor Statistics.  Respondents were asked if the hourly burden estimates and labor rates were appropriate and, if not, to provide estimates based on their experience.
        The hourly burden for each activity was multiplied by the number of Partners (respondents) performing the activity each year to estimate the total respondent burden.  In accordance with the Paper Reduction Act, Federal Partners were excluded from the burden estimate although we summarize their burden in Table 5.  Capital, operation and maintenance costs were also considered.  Attachment A presents the estimated annual respondent burden and costs for information collection activities associated with the GPP for each year of the collection.  Attachment A and Table 5 include burden estimates for Federal entities in the GPP, but these are not included as part of this Information Collection Request.  Attachment B presents the estimated annual respondent burden and costs for information collection activities associated with the CHPP for each year of the collection.  Table 3 in Section 6(e) of this supporting statement presents a summary of the overall respondent burden for both the GPP and CHPP for each of the three years as well as the total burden and the annual average burden.
 	6(b)	Estimating Respondent Costs
       (i)	Estimating Labor Costs
       Respondent labor rates came from the last ICR's direct consultations with GPP Partners and CHPP Partners, as discussed in section 6(a).  For GPP Partners, loaded rates are $143.84 for legal staff, $117.52 for managerial staff, $109.12 for technical staff, and $51.01 for clerical staff. For CHPP Partners, loaded rates are $143.84 for legal staff, $117.52 for managerial staff, $109.12 for technical staff, and $51.01 for clerical staff.  These labor rates will be re-evaluated in the 2018 ICR renewal.
 	For public sector respondents (Local and State Partners), EPA used the same labor rates used for EPA personnel (see Section 6(c)).  The Labor rates for management staff of public-sector respondents were used to represent labor rates for legal staff of public-sector respondents.
        (ii)	Estimating Capital and Operations and Maintenance Costs
 	Because this information collection requires respondents only to report information that is already available to them, there are no capital costs.  EPA does not expect that the operations and maintenance (O&M) costs of these programs will be significant.  The only O&M costs expected are for postage required to return any completed forms, long distance fax charges if the forms are faxed instead of mailed, and costs to copy the forms if Partners wish to retain them on file.  A submittal cost of $3 is attributed to all activities involving mailing materials to account for the use of trackable mail or long distance fax and copying.  If Partners choose to submit forms electronically, their costs will be lower than estimated.
 	6(c)	Estimating Agency Burden and Costs
 	Attachments C and D present the estimated Agency burden hours and costs for the information collection activities associated with GPP and CHPP, respectively.  Table 2 presents a summary of the Agency burden for both programs and the total burden.  EPA estimates an average hourly labor cost (labor plus 60% for overhead) of $117.52 for managerial staff, $109.12 for technical staff, and $51.01 for clerical staff.  To derive these estimates, EPA used the "Salary Table 2018 - GS Salary Table of Annual Rates by Grade and Step" dated January 2018, from the Department of Personnel Management.  For purposes of this ICR, EPA assigned staff the following government service levels:
       Managerial Staff  -  GS-15, Step 5  	$117.52
       Technical Staff  -  GS-13, Step 1    	$109.12
       Clerical Staff	-  GS-5, Step 1      	$51.01

                       Table 2: Summary of Agency Burden

                                     Year 1
                                     Year 2
                                     Year 3
                                     Total
                                Annual Average
 GPP Hours
                                                                          1,938
                                                                          2,013
                                                                          2,089
                                                                          6,040
                                                                          2,013
 CHP Hours
                                                                          1,370
                                                                          1,400
                                                                          1,432
                                                                          4,202
                                                                          1,400
 GPP Costs
                                                                       $100,442
                                                                       $104,310
                                                                       $108,175
                                                                       $312,927
                                                                       $104,309
 CHP Costs
                                                                        $80,003
                                                                        $81,763
                                                                        $83,582
                                                                       $245,348
                                                                        $81,782

 	6(d)     Estimating the Respondent Universe
 	GPP.  A total of 1,758 GPP Partners is expected by the end of 2018.  EPA expects future growth to be constant since the number of Partners that have joined in the past few years has been steady.  EPA anticipates that 80 new Partners will join the program each year in 2019, 2020, and 2021.  Of these new 80 Partners joining each year, EPA expects that 60 will be from the private sector, 19 from local and state governments, and 1 from Federal Government as is consistent with the Partnership's current makeup.  Each new Partner is required to complete and submit a Partnership Agreement form, and all participating Partners are expected to fill out or update the Partner Yearly Report, starting the year after they join.
 	The average annual number of respondents over three years is 1,572.  The number of respondents in each of the three years of this information collection and the average over the 3-year period is shown in Table 3 in Section 6(e) of this supporting statement.
 	CHPP.  A total of 423 Partners is expected by the end of 2018.  EPA anticipates 10 new Partners will join the program each year in 2019, 2020, and 2021.  Of these new respondents, it is assumed that there are 6 to 7 new Partners per year in each of the following categories:  end-users, project developers, consulting engineers, equipment manufacturers, and utilities, with up to an additional two Partners belonging to State/Local/Tribal governments per year.  Each of the new Partners is expected to fill out an LOI.  All of the new end-users, project developers, consulting engineers, and equipment manufacturers and 33% of new utility Partners will complete the CHPP Partner Projects Data Form within the same year they join the Partnership.  New State/Local/Tribal Agency Partners do not fill out project forms.  All of the existing project developers, ESCOs, consulting engineers and equipment manufacturers, and 33% of the existing utilities will continue to review their project information and provide updates every year in a project spreadsheet starting in the year they join the Partnership.
 	The average annual number of respondents over three years is 433.  The number of respondents in each of the three years of this information collection and the average over the 3-year period are shown in Table 3.
 6(e)	Bottom Line Burden Hours and Costs
 	GPP.  Attachments A and C show the detailed annual burden and cost to respondents and the Agency, respectively, for the information collection activities associated with GPP.  The results are summarized in Tables 3 and 4.  The total annual burden, averaged over the three-year period, is 5,079 hours and $558,643 per year for respondents and 2,013 hours and $104,310 per year for the Agency.  (See Tables 3 and 4 for these average numbers.)  The bottom line burden for respondents will be the least in year 1 and will gradually increase in years 2 and 3.  This is because there are more Partners responding in years 2 and 3.  The burden per respondent is similar in all 3 years.  In years 1, 2, and 3, new Partners will complete a Partnership Agreement.  In years 1, 2, and 3, existing Partners will update information in the Partner Yearly Report Form as needed.  After the first submittal, EPA will provide the information previously submitted by existing Partners and only ask for updates.  Similarly, the Agency burden is the least in year 1 and will gradually increase in years 2 and 3 as EPA has more information submittals to review and enter into the database.  See Tables 3 and 4 for respondent and Agency burdens in each of the three years.
       Table 5 summarizes the total annual respondent burden for Federal Partners, although these are not included in Table 3 since, in accordance with the Paperwork Reduction Act, Federal respondents are excluded from Information Collection Requests.  The total annual burden for Federal Partners, averaged over the three-year period, is 55 hours and $6,129 per year.

 	CHPP.  Attachments B and D show the detailed annual burden and cost to respondents and the Agency, respectively, for the information collection activities associated with CHPP.  The results are summarized in Tables 3 and 4.  The total annual burden, averaged over the three-year period is 1,519 hours and $172,739 for Partners, and 1,401 hours and $81,783 for the Agency.  (See Tables 3 and 4 for these average numbers.)  The bottom line burden for respondents will be the least in year 1 and will gradually increase in years 2 and 3.  This is because there are more Partners responding in years 2 and 3.  The burden per respondent is similar in all 3 years.  In years 1, 2, and 3, new Partners will complete an LOI.  If a new Partner has direct involvement in CHP projects, they will submit project forms in the year they join.  In years 1, 2, and 3, existing Partners will be updating information only as needed.  For Partners with ongoing project development activities, EPA will provide the information previously submitted by the existing Partners in a spreadsheet and only ask for updates.  Similarly, the Agency burden is the least in year 1 and will gradually increase in years 2 and 3 as EPA has more information submittals to review and enter into the database.  See Tables 3 and 4 for the respondent and Agency burdens in each of the three years.
       The CHPP has no Federal Partners so no burden is calculated in Table 5.

 	Total.  Considering both the GPP and the CHPP, the combined total annual burden (averaged over a 3-year period) is 6,598 hours and $731,382 per year for respondents and 3,414 hours and $186,093 per year for the Agency.  Tables 3 and 4 show the breakout between labor costs.  The burden estimates reflect an average of 2,602 respondents per year.  The average annual burden per respondent is 2.87 hours and $318.26 per year.

                                    TABLE 3.
     ESTIMATED TOTAL RESPONDENT BURDEN AND COST FOR GPP, CHPP, AND COMBINED

                                     Year 1
                                     Year 2
                                     Year 3
                                     Total
                                 Annual Average
 Green Power Partnership Program
 Number of Respondents*
                                                                          1,770
                                                                          1,852
                                                                          1,944
                                                                          5,566
                                                                          1,855

 Number of Company/Institutional Respondents
                                                                          1,512
                                                                          1,572
                                                                          1,632
                                                                          4,716
                                                                          1,572

 Number of Local/State Respondents
                                                                            258
                                                                            280
                                                                            312
                                                                            850
                                                                         283.33
 Hours
                                                                          3,756
                                                                          5,607
                                                                          5,873
                                                                         15,236
                                                                          5,079
 Labor Costs
                                                                     $4,167.71
                                                                     $4,738.55
                                                                        $4,739
                                                                       $13,645
                                                                         $4,548
 TOTAL Costs
                                                                      $412,823
                                                                      $620,721
                                                                      $642,385
                                                                    $1,675,929
                                                                       $558,643
 CHP Partnership Program
 Number of Respondents
                                                                            425
                                                                            435
                                                                            445
                                                                           1305
                                                                            435

 Number of Company/Institutional Respondents
                                                                            423
                                                                            433
                                                                            443
                                                                           1299
                                                                            433

 Number of State Respondents
                                                                              2
                                                                              2
                                                                              2
                                                                              6
                                                                              2
 Hours
                                                                          1,484
                                                                          1,519
                                                                          1,554
                                                                          4,557
                                                                          1,519
 Labor Costs
                                                                        $1,216
                                                                        $1,215
                                                                        $1,189
                                                                        $3,620
                                                                        $1,207
 TOTAL Costs
                                                                      $168,839
                                                                      $172,632
                                                                      $176,747
                                                                      $518,218
                                                                      $172,739
 Combined Totals for Both Programs
 Number of Respondents
                                                                          2,195
                                                                          2,287
                                                                          2,389
                                                                          6,871
                                                                          2,290
 Hours
                                                                          5,240
                                                                          7,126
                                                                          7,427
                                                                         19,793
                                                                          6,598
 Labor Costs
                                                                        $5,384
                                                                        $5,954
                                                                        $5,928
                                                                       $17,265
                                                                        $5,755
 TOTAL Costs
                                                                      $581,662
                                                                      $793,353
                                                                      $819,132
                                                                    $2,194,147
                                                                      $731,382
 Average annual hours per respondent

                                      2.87
 Average annual costs per respondent

                                    $318.26
 *In accordance with the Paperwork Reduction Act, Federal government respondents are not included in the burden estimate in Table 3 because, based on its experience, GPP assumes that participating Federal facilities are not run by contractors. The burden on Federal government respondents is shown separately in Table 5.

                                    TABLE 4.
       ESTIMATED TOTAL AGENCY BURDEN AND COST FOR GPP, CHPP and COMBINED

                                     Year 1
                                     Year 2
                                     Year 3
                                     Total
                                 Annual Average
 Green Power Partnership Program
 Number of Respondents
                                                                          1,512
                                                                          1,572
                                                                          1,632
                                                                          4,716
                                                                          1,572
 Hours
                                                                          1,938
                                                                          2,013
                                                                          2,089
                                                                          6,040
                                                                          2,013
 Labor Costs
                                                                      $100,442
                                                                      $104,310
                                                                      $108,178
                                                                      $312,930
                                                                      $104,310
 TOTAL Costs
                                                                      $100,442
                                                                      $104,310
                                                                      $108,178
                                                                      $312,930
                                                                      $104,310
 CHP Partnership Program
 Number of Respondents
                                                                            423
                                                                            433
                                                                            443
                                                                          1,299
                                                                            433
 Hours
                                                                          1,370
                                                                          1,400
                                                                          1,432
                                                                          4,202
                                                                          1,401
 Labor Costs
                                                                       $80,003
                                                                       $81,763
                                                                       $83,582
                                                                      $245,348
                                                                       $81,783
 TOTAL Costs
                                                                       $80,003
                                                                       $81,763
                                                                       $83,582
                                                                      $245,348
                                                                       $81,783
 Combined Totals for Both Programs
 Number of Respondents
                                                                          1,935
                                                                          2,005
                                                                          2,075
                                                                          6,015
                                                                          2,005
 Hours
                                                                          3,308
                                                                          3,413
                                                                          3,521
                                                                         10,242
                                                                          3,414
 Labor Costs
                                                                      $180,445
                                                                      $186,073
                                                                      $191,760
                                                                      $558,278
                                                                      $186,093
 TOTAL Costs
                                                                      $180,445
                                                                      $186,073
                                                                      $191,760
                                                                      $558,278
                                                                      $186,093

                                    TABLE 5.
          ESTIMATED RESPONDENT BURDEN FOR FEDERAL GOVERNMENT PARTNERS

                                     Year 1
                                     Year 2
                                     Year 3
                                     Total
                                 Annual Average
 Green Power Partnership Program
 Number of Respondents
                                                                             12
                                                                             14
                                                                             26
                                                                             52
                                                                          17.33
 Hours
                                                                           39.6
                                                                             46
                                                                           81.8
                                                                          167.4
                                                                           55.8
 Labor Costs
                                                                        $1,577
                                                                        $1,577
                                                                        $1,577
                                                                        $4,730
                                                                         $1,577
 TOTAL Costs
                                                                        $4,343
                                                                        $5,054
                                                                        $8,991
                                                                       $18,388
                                                                         $6,129
 CHP Partnership Program
 Number of Respondents
                                                                              0
                                                                              0
                                                                              0
                                                                              0
                                                                              0
 Hours
                                                                              0
                                                                              0
                                                                              0
                                                                              0
                                                                              0
 Labor Costs
                                                                              0
                                                                              0
                                                                              0
                                                                              0
                                                                              0
 TOTAL Costs
                                                                              0
                                                                              0
                                                                              0
                                                                              0
                                                                              0
 Combined Totals for Both Programs
 Number of Respondents
                                                                             12
                                                                             14
                                                                             26
                                                                             52
                                                                          17.33
 Hours
                                                                           39.6
                                                                             46
                                                                           81.8
                                                                          167.4
                                                                           55.8
 Labor Costs
                                                                        $1,577
                                                                        $1,577
                                                                        $1,577
                                                                        $4,730
                                                                         $1,577
 TOTAL Costs
                                                                        $4,343
                                                                        $5,054
                                                                        $8,991
                                                                       $18,388
                                                                         $6,129
 Average annual hours per respondent

                                                                           3.22
 Average annual costs per respondent

                                                                           $354

 	6(f)	Reasons for Change in Burden
 	Under this renewal ICR, the average annual total respondent burden is 2.87 hours. Since the initial ICR, both the GPP and CHPP have introduced program efficiencies to reduce program burden and simplified collection forms into pre-populated spreadsheets or documents. As a result of these changes, the average number of hours per Partner has decreased during each renewal from 3.2 hours to 2.87 hours, but the total hourly burden for Partners still increased because of an increase in the number of Partners.  For perspective on the magnitude of Partner growth, the number of Partners at the end of 2008 was 1,308, whereas by year-end 2018 there was an estimated 1959 (GPP has 1546, and CHP has 413).
 	6(g)	Burden Statement
 	The annual public reporting and recordkeeping burden for this collection of information is estimated to average 2.87 hours per respondent.  The average number of annual burden hours per type of response is: 5.5 hours for a Partnership Agreement (a one-time burden for GPP); 3.5 hours for a Letter of Intent (a one-time burden for CHPP Partners), 1.6 hours for the Partner Yearly Report for the GPP, 2.8 hours for the Partner Yearly Report for the CHPP.
 	Partners from both programs may also submit voluntary updates of simple information, such as contact information or company profiles, via the Web site.  These updates would take from 15 minutes to 0.5 hours per response.  A subset of Partners may participate in brief (i.e., 15 minute) telephone calls with EPA to clarify questions pertaining to the Partnership Agreement or LOI, GPP Partner Yearly Report, or CHPP Partner project reporting.  All of these activities are included in the annual burden estimate.

 	To comment on the Agency's need for this information, the accuracy of the provide burden estimates, and any suggested methods for minimizing respondent burden, including the use of automated collection techniques, EPA has established a public docket for this ICR under Docket ID No.  EPA-HQ-OAR-2004-0501, which is available for public viewing at the Air and Radiation Docket and Information Center in EPA's Docket Center (EPA/DC), EPA West, Room 3334, 1301 Constitution Avenue, NW, Washington, DC.  EPA's Docket Center Public Reading Room is open from 8:30 a.m. to 4:30 p.m., Monday through Friday, excluding legal holidays.  The telephone number for the Reading Room is<PHONE_NUMBER>, and the telephone number for the Air and Radiation Docket is<PHONE_NUMBER>.  An electronic version of the public docket is available at www.regulations.gov.  This site can be used to submit or view public comments, access the index listing of the contents of the public docket, and to access those documents in the public docket that are available electronically.  Once in the system, select "search," then key in the docket ID number identified above.  Also, you can send comments to the Office of Information and Regulatory Affairs, Office of Management and Budget, 725 17th Street, NW, Washington, DC 20503, Attention: Desk Officer for EPA.  Please include EPA's Docket ID No. EPA-HQ-OAR-2004-0501 and OMB Control Number 2060-0578 in any correspondence.
 ATTACHMENT A: Green Power Partnership Respondent Burden for Years 1 through 3
 A-1 Green Power Partnership Private Sector Respondent Burden for Year 1
 A-2 Green Power Partnership Private Sector Respondent Burden for Year 2
 A-3 Green Power Partnership Private Sector Respondent Burden for Year 3
 A-4 Green Power Partnership Local & State Government Respondent Burden for Year 1
 A-5 Green Power Partnership Local & State Government Respondent Burden for Year 2
 A-6 Green Power Partnership Local & State Government Respondent Burden for Year 3
 A-7 Green Power Partnership Federal Government Respondent Burden for Year 1
 A-8 Green Power Partnership Federal Government Respondent Burden for Year 2
 A-9 Green Power Partnership Federal Government Respondent Burden for Year 3
 ATTACHMENT B: CHP Partnership Respondent Burden for Years 1 through 3
 B-1 CHP Partnership Private Sector Respondent Burden for Year 1
 B-2 CHP Partnership Private Sector Respondent Burden for Year 2
 B-3 CHP Partnership Private Sector Respondent Burden for Year 3
 B-4 CHP Partnership State & Local Government Respondent Burden for Year 1
 B-5 CHP Partnership State & Local Government Respondent Burden for Year 2
 B-6 CHP Partnership State & Local Government Respondent Burden for Year 3
 ATTACHMENT C:  Green Power Partnership Agency (EPA) Burden for Years 1 through 3
 C-1 Green Power Partnership Agency (EPA) Burden for Year 1
 C-2 Green Power Partnership Agency (EPA) Burden for Year 2
 C-3 Green Power Partnership Agency (EPA) Burden for Year 3
 ATTACHMENT D: CHP Partnership Agency (EPA) Burden for Years 1 through 3
 D-1 CHP Partnership Agency (EPA) Burden for Year 1
 D-2 CHP Partnership Agency (EPA) Burden for Year 2
 D-3 CHP Partnership Agency (EPA) Burden for Year 3


[Federal Register Volume 76, Number 102 (Thursday, May 26, 2011)]
[Proposed Rules]
[Pages 30573-30575]
[FR Doc No: 2011-13013]

=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION

Federal Aviation Administration

14 CFR Part 39

[Docket No. FAA-2011-0278; Directorate Identifier 2010-NE-10-AD]
RIN 2120-AA64

Airworthiness Directives; General Electric Company (GE) GE90-
110B1 and GE90-115B Turbofan Engines

AGENCY: Federal Aviation Administration (FAA), DOT.

ACTION: Notice of proposed rulemaking (NPRM).

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: We propose to adopt a new airworthiness directive (AD) for the
products listed above, with certain part number (P/N) high-pressure
compressor (HPC) stages 2-5 spools installed. This proposed AD would
require eddy current inspection (ECI) or spot fluorescent penetrant
inspection (FPI) of the stages 1-2 rotating seal teeth of the HPC
stages 2-5 spool for cracks and would prohibit installation of HPC
stator stage 1 interstage seals that are not pregrooved to prevent
heavy rubs. This proposed AD was prompted by an aborted takeoff and two
shop findings of cracks in the stages 1-2 rotating seal teeth. We are
proposing this AD to detect cracks in the HPC stages 1-2 rotating seal
teeth due to heavy rubs, which could result in failure of the stages 1-
2 rotating seal of the HPC

stages 2-5 spool, uncontained engine failure, and damage to the
airplane.

DATES: We must receive any comments on this proposed AD by July 11,
2011.

ADDRESSES: You may send comments by any of the following methods:
     Federal eRulemaking Portal: Go to http://www.regulations.gov. Follow the instructions for submitting comments.
     Fax:<PHONE_NUMBER>.
     Mail: U.S. Department of Transportation, Docket
Operations, M-30, West Building Ground Floor, Room W12-140, 1200 New
Jersey Avenue, SE., Washington, DC 20590.
     Hand Delivery: Deliver to Mail address above between 9
a.m. and 5 p.m., Monday through Friday, except Federal holidays.
    For service information identified in this proposed AD, contact
General Electric, GE-Aviation, Room 285, 1 Newman Way, Cincinnati, Ohio
45215; e-mail<EMAIL_ADDRESS>phone:<PHONE_NUMBER>; fax:<PHONE_NUMBER>.
You may review copies of the referenced service information at the FAA,
Engine & Propeller Directorate, 12 New England Executive Park,
Burlington, MA. For information on the availability of this material at
the FAA, call<PHONE_NUMBER>.

Examining the AD Docket

    You may examine the AD docket on the Internet at http://www.regulations.gov; or in person at the Docket Management Facility
between 9 a.m. and 5 p.m., Monday through Friday, except Federal
holidays. The AD docket contains this proposed AD, the regulatory
evaluation, any comments received, and other information. The street
address for the Docket Office (phone:<PHONE_NUMBER>) is in the ADDRESSES
section. Comments will be available in the AD docket shortly after
receipt.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Jason Yang, Aerospace Engineer, Engine
Certification Office, FAA, Engine & Propeller Directorate, 12 New
England Executive Park, Burlington, MA 01803; phone:<PHONE_NUMBER>; fax:
781-238-7199; e-mail<EMAIL_ADDRESS>
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

Comments Invited

    We invite you to send us any written relevant data, views, or
arguments about this proposal. Send your comments to an address listed
under the ADDRESSES section. Include ``Docket No. FAA-2011-0278;
Directorate Identifier 2010-NE-10-AD'' in the subject line of your
comments. We specifically invite comments on the overall regulatory,
economic, environmental, and energy aspects of this proposed AD. We
will consider all comments received by the closing date and may amend
the proposed AD because of those comments.
    We will post all comments we receive, without change, to http://www.regulations.gov, including any personal information you provide. We
will also post a report summarizing each substantive verbal contact we
receive about this proposed AD.

Discussion

    We received a report of an engine failure caused by the liberation
of a portion of the HPC stages 1-2 rotating seal teeth, and subsequent
reports of HPC stages 1-2 rotating seal teeth cracks, due to heavy
rubs, found in engines in the shop. The heavy rubs are due to
insufficient clearance between the rotating seal teeth and the
abradable coating on the static seal. This proposed AD would require
ECI or spot FPI of the stages 1-2 rotating seal teeth of the HPC stages
2-5 spool for cracks, and would prohibit installation of HPC stator
stage 1 interstage seals that are not pregrooved in order to prevent
heavy rubs. This condition, if not corrected, could result in failure
of the stages 1-2 rotating seal of the HPC stages 2-5 spool,
uncontained engine failure, and damage to the airplane.

Relevant Service Information

    We reviewed GE Service Bulletin (SB) GE90-100 S/B 72-0320, Revision
02, dated October 1, 2010. That service information describes
procedures for inspecting the stages 1-2 seal teeth for cracks.

FAA's Determination

    We are proposing this AD because we evaluated all the relevant
information and determined the unsafe condition described previously is
likely to exist or develop on other products of the same type design.

Proposed AD Requirements

    This proposed AD would require accomplishing the actions specified
in the service information described previously.

Costs of Compliance

    We estimate that this proposed AD would affect 19 GE90-110B1 and
GE90-115B engines installed on airplanes of U.S. registry. We also
estimate that it would take about 2 work-hours per engine to perform
the proposed actions, and that the average labor rate is $85 per work-
hour. Required parts would cost about $9,857 per engine. Based on these
figures, we estimate the total cost of the proposed AD to U.S.
operators to be $190,513.

Authority for This Rulemaking

    Title 49 of the United States Code specifies the FAA's authority to
issue rules on aviation safety. Subtitle I, section 106, describes the
authority of the FAA Administrator. Subtitle VII, Aviation Programs,
describes in more detail the scope of the Agency's authority.
    We are issuing this rulemaking under the authority described in
subtitle VII, part A, subpart III, section 44701, ``General
requirements.'' Under that section, Congress charges the FAA with
promoting safe flight of civil aircraft in air commerce by prescribing
regulations for practices, methods, and procedures the Administrator
finds necessary for safety in air commerce. This regulation is within
the scope of that authority because it addresses an unsafe condition
that is likely to exist or develop on products identified in this
rulemaking action.

Regulatory Findings

    We determined that this proposed AD would not have federalism
implications under Executive Order 13132. This proposed AD would not
have a substantial direct effect on the States, on the relationship
between the national Government and the States, or on the distribution
of power and responsibilities among the various levels of government.
    For the reasons discussed above, I certify that the proposed
regulation:
    1. Is not a ``significant regulatory action'' under Executive Order
12866;
    2. Is not a ``significant rule'' under the DOT Regulatory Policies
and Procedures (44 FR 11034, February 26, 1979);
    3. Will not affect intrastate aviation in Alaska; and
    4. Will not have a significant economic impact, positive or
negative, on a substantial number of small entities under the criteria
of the Regulatory Flexibility Act.

List of Subjects in 14 CFR Part 39

    Air transportation, Aircraft, Aviation safety, Incorporation by
reference, Safety.

The Proposed Amendment

    Accordingly, under the authority delegated to me by the
Administrator, the FAA proposes to amend 14 CFR part 39 as follows:

PART 39--AIRWORTHINESS DIRECTIVES

    1. The authority citation for part 39 continues to read as follows:

    Authority:  49 U.S.C. 106(g), 40113, 44701.

Sec.  39.13  [Amended]

    2. The FAA amends Sec.  39.13 by adding the following new
airworthiness directive (AD):

General Electric Company: Docket No. FAA-2011-0278; Directorate
Identifier 2010-NE-10-AD.

Comments Due Date

    (a) We must receive comments by July 11, 2011.

Affected ADs

    (b) None.

Applicability

    (c) This AD applies to General Electric Company (GE) GE90-110B1
and GE90-115B turbofan engines with high-pressure compressor (HPC)
stages 2-5 spools, part numbers (P/Ns) 351-103-106-0, 351-103-107-0,
351-103-108-0, 351-103-109-0, 351-103-141-0, 351-103-142-0, 351-103-
143-0 and 351-103-144-0, installed.

Unsafe Condition

    (d) This AD was prompted by an aborted takeoff and two shop
findings of cracks in the stages 1-2 rotating seal teeth. We are
issuing this AD to detect cracks in the HPC stages 1-2 rotating seal
teeth due to heavy rubs, which could result in failure of the stages
1-2 rotating seal of the HPC stages 2-5 spool, uncontained engine
failure, and damage to the airplane.

Compliance

    (e) Comply with this AD when the HPC forward case half is
removed from the engine after the effective date of this AD, unless
the actions have already been done.

Inspection

    (f) Perform an eddy current inspection or a fluorescent
penetrant inspection of the stage 1-2 seal teeth using paragraphs
3.B. or 3.C. of GE Service Bulletin (SB) GE90-100 S/B 72-0320,
Revision 02, dated October 1, 2010.

Disposition of Spools with Cracked Seal Teeth

    (g) If you find cracks, remove the HPC stages 2-5 spool from
service.

Previous Credit

    (h) An inspection performed before the effective date of this AD
using SB GE90-100 S/B 72-0320 Revision 01, dated May 11, 2010, or
earlier revision, satisfies the inspection requirement of this AD.

Installation Prohibition

    (i) After the effective date of this AD, do not install any HPC
forward case unless it has an HPC stator stage 1 interstage seals,
P/N 351-109-503-0.

Alternative Methods of Compliance (AMOCs)

    (j) The Manager, Engine Certification Office, has the authority
to approve AMOCs for this AD if requested using the procedures found
in 14 CFR 39.19.

Related Information

    (k) Contact Jason Yang, Aerospace Engineer, Engine Certification
Office, FAA, Engine & Propeller Directorate, 12 New England
Executive Park, Burlington, MA 01803; phone:<PHONE_NUMBER>; fax: 781-
238-7199; e-mail<EMAIL_ADDRESS>for more information about
this AD.
    (l) GE Service Bulletin GE90-100 S/B 72-0320, Revision 02, dated
October 1, 2010, pertain to the subject of this AD. Contact General
Electric, GE-Aviation, Room 285, 1 Newman Way, Cincinnati, Ohio
45215; e-mail<EMAIL_ADDRESS>phone:<PHONE_NUMBER>; fax: 513-552-
3329, for a copy of this service information.

    Issued in Burlington, Massachusetts, on May 20, 2011.
Peter A. White,
Acting Manager, Engine and Propeller Directorate, Aircraft
Certification Service.
[FR Doc. 2011-13013 Filed 5-25-11; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910-13-P


[Federal Register Volume 78, Number 97 (Monday, May 20, 2013)]
[Notices]
[Page 29425]
[FR Doc No: 2013-11959]

=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION

Federal Aviation Administration

Agency Information Collection Activities: Requests for Comments;
Clearance of Renewed Approval of Information Collection: Passenger
Facility Charge (PFC) Application

AGENCY: Federal Aviation Administration (FAA), DOT.

ACTION: Notice and request for comments.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: In accordance with the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995, FAA
invites public comments about our intention to request the Office of
Management and Budget (OMB) approval to renew an information
collection. This program requires public agencies and certain members
of the aviation industry to prepare and submit applications and reports
to the FAA. Through this program the FAA provides additional funding
for airport development which is needed now and in the future.

DATES: Written comments should be submitted by July 19, 2013.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Kathy DePaepe at<PHONE_NUMBER>, or by
email at<EMAIL_ADDRESS>
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
    OMB Control Number: 2120-0557.
    Title: Passenger Facility Charge (PFC) Application.
    Form Numbers: FAA Form 5500-1.
    Type of Review: Renewal of an information collection.
    Background: 49 U.S.C. 40117 authorizes airports to impose passenger
facility charges (PFC). The final rule (14 CFR part 158) implementing
this Act was effective June 28, 1991. The information collected allows
the FAA to approve the collection of PFC revenue for projects which
preserve or enhance safety, security, or capacity of the national air
transportation system, or which reduce noise or mitigate noise impacts
resulting from an airport, or which furnish opportunities for enhanced
competition between or among air carriers.
    Respondents: Approximately 450 applicants annually.
    Frequency: Information is collected quarterly.
    Estimated Average Burden per Response: 10 hours.
    Estimated Total Annual Burden: 24,025 hours.

ADDRESSES: Send comments to the FAA at the following address: Ms. Kathy
DePaepe, Room 126B, Federal Aviation Administration, AES-200, 6500 S.
MacArthur Blvd., Oklahoma City, OK 73169.
    Public Comments Invited: You are asked to comment on any aspect of
this information collection, including (a) Whether the proposed
collection of information is necessary for FAA's performance; (b) the
accuracy of the estimated burden; (c) ways for FAA to enhance the
quality, utility and clarity of the information collection; and (d)
ways that the burden could be minimized without reducing the quality of
the collected information. The agency will summarize and/or include
your comments in the request for OMB's clearance of this information
collection.

    Issued in Washington, DC, on May 15, 2013.
Albert R. Spence,
FAA Assistant Information Collection Clearance Officer, IT Enterprises
Business Services Division, AES-200.
[FR Doc. 2013-11959 Filed 5-17-13; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910-13-P


[Federal Register: March 19, 2008 (Volume 73, Number 54)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Page 14666-14668]
[DOCID:fr19mr08-4]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION

Federal Aviation Administration

14 CFR Part 39

[Docket No. FAA-2007-0346; Directorate Identifier 2007-NM-202-AD;
Amendment 39-15436; AD 2008-06-24]
RIN 2120-AA64

Airworthiness Directives; Boeing Model 737-300, -400, and -500
Series Airplanes

AGENCY: Federal Aviation Administration (FAA), DOT.

ACTION: Final rule.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: We are adopting a new airworthiness directive (AD) for certain
Boeing Model 737-300, -400, and -500 series airplanes. This AD requires
an inspection to determine the manufacturer and manufacture date of the
oxygen masks in the passenger service unit and the lavatory and
attendant box assemblies, corrective action if necessary, and other
specified action. This AD results from a report that several passenger
masks with broken in-line flow indicators were found following a mask
deployment. We are issuing this AD to prevent the in-line flow
indicators of the passenger oxygen masks from fracturing and
separating, which could inhibit oxygen flow to the masks and
consequently result in exposure of the passengers and cabin attendants
to hypoxia following a depressurization event.

DATES: This AD is effective April 23, 2008.
    The Director of the Federal Register approved the incorporation by
reference of a certain publication listed in this AD as of April 23,
2008.

ADDRESSES: For service information identified in this AD, contact
Boeing Commercial Airplanes, P.O. Box 3707, Seattle, Washington 98124-
2207.

Examining the AD Docket

    You may examine the AD docket on the Internet at http://
www.regulations.gov; or in person at the Docket Management Facility
between 9 a.m. and 5 p.m., Monday through Friday, except Federal
holidays. The AD docket contains this AD, the regulatory evaluation,
any comments received, and other information. The address for the
Docket Office (telephone<PHONE_NUMBER>) is the Document Management
Facility, U.S. Department of Transportation, Docket Operations, M-30,
West Building Ground Floor, Room W12-140, 1200 New Jersey Avenue, SE.,
Washington, DC 20590.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Susan Letcher, Aerospace Engineer,
Cabin Safety and Environmental Systems Branch, ANM-150S, FAA, Seattle
Aircraft Certification Office, 1601 Lind Avenue, SW., Renton,
Washington 98057-3356; telephone<PHONE_NUMBER>; fax<PHONE_NUMBER>.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

Discussion

    We issued a notice of proposed rulemaking (NPRM) to amend 14 CFR
part 39 to include an airworthiness directive (AD) that would apply to
certain Model Boeing 737-300, -400, and -500 series airplanes. That
NPRM was published in the Federal Register on December 19, 2007 (72 FR
71830). That NPRM proposed to require an inspection to determine the
manufacturer and manufacture date of the oxygen masks in the passenger
service unit (PSU) and the lavatory and attendant box assemblies,
corrective action if necessary, and other specified action.

Comments

    We gave the public the opportunity to participate in developing
this AD. We received no comments on the NPRM or on the determination of
the cost to the public.

Conclusion

    We reviewed the relevant data and determined that air safety and
the public interest require adopting the AD as proposed.

Costs of Compliance

    There are about 1,956 airplanes of the affected design in the
worldwide fleet. This AD affects about 646 airplanes of U.S. registry.
The required actions take about 16 work hours per airplane, for an
average of 180 oxygen masks per airplane distributed in about 45 PSUs/
oxygen boxes, at an average labor rate of $80 per work hour. Required
parts cost about $6 per oxygen mask, or $1,080 per airplane. Based on
these figures, the estimated cost of the AD for U.S. operators is
$1,524,560, or $2,360 per airplane.

Authority for This Rulemaking

    Title 49 of the United States Code specifies the FAA's authority to
issue rules on aviation safety. Subtitle I, section 106, describes the
authority of the FAA Administrator. ``Subtitle VII: Aviation
Programs,'' describes in more detail the scope of the Agency's
authority.
    We are issuing this rulemaking under the authority described in
``Subtitle VII, Part A, Subpart III, Section 44701: General
requirements.'' Under that section, Congress charges the FAA with
promoting safe flight of civil aircraft in air commerce by prescribing
regulations for practices, methods, and procedures the Administrator
finds necessary for safety in air commerce. This regulation is within
the scope of that authority because it addresses an unsafe condition
that is likely to exist or develop on products identified in this
rulemaking action.

Regulatory Findings

    This AD will not have federalism implications under Executive Order
13132. This AD will not have a substantial direct effect on the States,
on the relationship between the national government and the States, or
on the distribution of power and responsibilities among the various
levels of government.
    For the reasons discussed above, I certify that this AD:
    (1) Is not a ``significant regulatory action'' under Executive
Order 12866,
    (2) Is not a ``significant rule'' under DOT Regulatory Policies and
Procedures (44 FR 11034, February 26, 1979), and
    (3) Will not have a significant economic impact, positive or
negative, on a substantial number of small entities under the criteria
of the Regulatory Flexibility Act.
    You can find our regulatory evaluation and the estimated costs of
compliance in the AD Docket.

List of Subjects in 14 CFR Part 39

    Air transportation, Aircraft, Aviation safety, Incorporation by
reference, Safety.

Adoption of the Amendment

0
Accordingly, under the authority delegated to me by the Administrator,
the FAA amends 14 CFR part 39 as follows:

PART 39--AIRWORTHINESS DIRECTIVES

0
1. The authority citation for part 39 continues to read as follows:

    Authority: 49 U.S.C. 106(g), 40113, 44701.

Sec.  39.13  [Amended]

0
2. The FAA amends Sec.  39.13 by adding the following new AD:

2008-06-24 Boeing: Amendment 39-15436. Docket No. FAA-2007-0346;
Directorate Identifier 2007-NM-202-AD.

Effective Date

    (a) This airworthiness directive (AD) is effective April 23,
2008.

Affected ADs

    (b) None.

Applicability

    (c) This AD applies to Boeing Model 737-300, -400, and -500
series airplanes, certificated in any category; as identified in
Boeing Special Attention Service Bulletin 737-35-1099, dated April
9, 2007.

Unsafe Condition

    (d) This AD results from a report that several passenger masks
with broken in-line flow indicators were found following a mask
deployment. We are issuing this AD to prevent the in-line flow
indicators of the passenger oxygen masks from fracturing and
separating, which could inhibit oxygen flow to the masks and
consequently result in exposure of the passengers and cabin
attendants to hypoxia following a depressurization event.

Compliance

    (e) You are responsible for having the actions required by this
AD performed within the compliance times specified, unless the
actions have already been done.

Inspection and Related Investigative/Corrective Actions if Necessary

    (f) Within 60 months after the effective date of this AD, do a
general visual inspection to determine the manufacturer and
manufacture date of the oxygen masks in the passenger service unit
and the lavatory and attendant box assemblies, and do the applicable
corrective action and other specified action, by accomplishing all
of the applicable actions specified in the Accomplishment
Instructions of Boeing Special Attention Service Bulletin 737-35-
1099, dated April 9, 2007; except where the service bulletin
specifies repairing the oxygen mask assembly, replace it with a new

or modified oxygen mask assembly having an improved flow indicator.
The corrective action and other specified action must be done before
further flight.

    Note 1: Boeing Special Attention Service Bulletin 737-35-1099
refers to B/E Aerospace Service Bulletin 174080-35-01, dated
February 6, 2006; and Revision 1, dated May 1, 2006; as additional
sources of service information for modifying the oxygen mask
assembly by replacing the flow indicator with an improved flow
indicator.

Alternative Methods of Compliance (AMOCs)

    (g)(1) The Manager, Seattle Aircraft Certification Office, FAA,
has the authority to approve AMOCs for this AD, if requested in
accordance with the procedures found in 14 CFR 39.19.
    (2) To request a different method of compliance or a different
compliance time for this AD, follow the procedures in 14 CFR 39.19.
Before using any approved AMOC on any airplane to which the AMOC
applies, notify your appropriate principal inspector (PI) in the FAA
Flight Standards District Office (FSDO), or lacking a PI, your local
FSDO.

Material Incorporated by Reference

    (h) You must use Boeing Special Attention Service Bulletin 737-
35-1099, dated April 9, 2007, to do the actions required by this AD,
unless the AD specifies otherwise.
    (1) The Director of the Federal Register approved the
incorporation by reference of this service information under 5
U.S.C. 552(a) and 1 CFR part 51.
    (2) For service information identified in this AD, contact
Boeing Commercial Airplanes, P.O. Box 3707, Seattle, Washington
98124-2207.
    (3) You may review copies of the service information
incorporated by reference at the FAA, Transport Airplane
Directorate, 1601 Lind Avenue, SW., Renton, Washington; or at the
National Archives and Records Administration (NARA). For information
on the availability of this material at NARA, call<PHONE_NUMBER>, or
go to: http://www.archives.gov/federal_register/code_of_federal_
regulations/ibr_locations.html.

    Issued in Renton, Washington, on March 9, 2008.
Stephen P. Boyd,
Manager, Transport Airplane Directorate, Aircraft Certification
Service.
[FR Doc. E8-5276 Filed 3-18-08; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4910-13-P