[Federal Register Volume 82, Number 66 (Friday, April 7, 2017)]
[Proposed Rules]
[Pages 16948-16952]
[FR Doc No: 2017-06705]

========================================================================
Proposed Rules
                                                Federal Register
________________________________________________________________________

This section of the FEDERAL REGISTER contains notices to the public of
the proposed issuance of rules and regulations. The purpose of these
notices is to give interested persons an opportunity to participate in
the rule making prior to the adoption of the final rules.

========================================================================

Federal Register / Vol. 82, No. 66 / Friday, April 7, 2017 / Proposed
Rules

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION

Federal Aviation Administration

14 CFR Part 39

[Docket No. FAA-2016-0461; Directorate Identifier 2014-NM-159-AD]
RIN 2120-AA64

Airworthiness Directives; Airbus Airplanes

AGENCY: Federal Aviation Administration (FAA), DOT.

ACTION: Supplemental notice of proposed rulemaking (SNPRM); reopening
of comment period.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: We are revising an earlier proposed airworthiness directive
(AD) for all Airbus Model A319, A320, and A321 series airplanes. This
action revises the notice of proposed rulemaking (NPRM) by reducing the
compliance time for replacing the main landing gear (MLG) actuator
fitting and removing an inspection requirement for certain airplanes.
We are proposing this AD to address the unsafe condition on these
products. Since these actions impose an additional burden over those
proposed in the NPRM, we are reopening the comment period to allow the
public the chance to comment on these proposed changes.

DATES: We must receive comments on this SNPRM by May 22, 2017.

ADDRESSES: You may send comments, using the procedures found in 14 CFR
11.43 and 11.45, by any of the following methods:
     Federal eRulemaking Portal: Go to http://www.regulations.gov. Follow the instructions for submitting comments.
     Fax:<PHONE_NUMBER>.
     Mail: U.S. Department of Transportation, Docket
Operations, M-30, West Building Ground Floor, Room W12-140, 1200 New
Jersey Avenue SE., Washington, DC 20590.
     Hand Delivery: U.S. Department of Transportation, Docket
Operations, M-30, West Building Ground Floor, Room W12-140, 1200 New
Jersey Avenue SE., Washington, DC, between 9 a.m. and 5 p.m., Monday
through Friday, except Federal holidays.
    For service information identified in this SNPRM, contact Airbus,
Airworthiness Office--EIAS, 1 Rond Point Maurice Bellonte, 31707
Blagnac Cedex, France; telephone +33 5 61 93 36 96; fax +33 5 61 93 44
51; email<EMAIL_ADDRESS>Internet http://www.airbus.com. You may view this referenced service information at the
FAA, Transport Airplane Directorate, 1601 Lind Avenue SW., Renton, WA.
For information on the availability of this material at the FAA, call
425-227-1221.

Examining the AD Docket

    You may examine the AD docket on the Internet at http://www.regulations.gov by searching for and locating Docket No. FAA-2016-
0461; or in person at the Docket Management Facility between 9 a.m. and
5 p.m., Monday through Friday, except Federal holidays. The AD docket
contains this proposed AD, the regulatory evaluation, any comments
received, and other information. The street address for the Docket
Office (telephone:<PHONE_NUMBER>) is in the ADDRESSES section. Comments
will be available in the AD docket shortly after receipt.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Sanjay Ralhan, Aerospace Engineer,
International Branch, ANM-116, Transport Airplane Directorate, FAA,
1601 Lind Avenue SW., Renton, WA 98057-3356; telephone<PHONE_NUMBER>;
fax<PHONE_NUMBER>.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

Comments Invited

    We invite you to send any written relevant data, views, or
arguments about this proposed AD. Send your comments to an address
listed under the ADDRESSES section. Include ``Docket No. FAA-2016-0461;
Directorate Identifier 2014-NM-159-AD'' at the beginning of your
comments. We specifically invite comments on the overall regulatory,
economic, environmental, and energy aspects of this proposed AD. We
will consider all comments received by the closing date and may amend
this proposed AD based on those comments.
    We will post all comments we receive, without change, to http://www.regulations.gov, including any personal information you provide. We
will also post a report summarizing each substantive verbal contact we
receive about this proposed AD.

Discussion

    We issued an NPRM to amend 14 CFR part 39 by adding an AD that
would apply to all Airbus Model A319, A320, and A321 series airplanes.
The NPRM published in the Federal Register on January 28, 2016 (81 FR
4901) (``the NPRM''). The NPRM was prompted by a report that an MLG
door could not be closed due to rupture of the actuator fitting. The
NPRM proposed to require repetitive inspections for cracking of the MLG
door actuator fitting and its components, and corrective actions if
necessary. The NPRM also proposed to require eventual replacement of
all affected MLG door actuator fittings with new monoblock fittings,
which would terminate the repetitive inspections.

Actions Since the NPRM Was Issued

    Since the NPRM was issued, the European Aviation Safety Agency
(EASA), which is the Technical Agent for the Member States of the
European Union, has issued EASA Airworthiness Directive 2016-0182,
dated September 13, 2016 (referred to after this as the Mandatory
Continuing Airworthiness Information, or ``the MCAI''), to correct an
unsafe condition for all Airbus Model A319, A320, and A321 series
airplanes. The MCAI states:

    On one A320 aeroplane, it was reported that one of the main
landing gear (MLG) doors could not be closed. Investigations
revealed the rupture of the actuator fitting at the actuator
attachment area on the door side. The MLG door is attached to the
aeroplane by 2 (two) hinge fittings.
    This condition, if not corrected, could, under certain
circumstances, lead to detachment of a MLG door from the aeroplane,
possibly resulting in damage to the aeroplane, and/or injury to
persons on the ground.
    Prompted by these findings, [Direction G[eacute]n[eacute]rale de
l'Aviation Civile] France issued * * * [an AD] * * *, to require a
MLG door actuator fitting inspection for cracks and to check the
grain direction on a batch of aeroplanes. Subsequently, DGAC France
issued * * * [an AD], retaining the requirements of DGAC France AD *
* *, which was superseded, to require an inspection of the lower
part of the MLG door actuator fitting.
    After that [DGAC] AD was issued, additional investigations
revealed that damage could also appear on the nerve area

[of the forward monoblock fitting], in the upper part of the MLG
door actuator fitting in the area of the hinge.
    Consequently, DGAC France issued F-2003-434, dated December 10,
2003 [http://ad.easa.europa.eu/ad/F-2003-454] (EASA approval 2003-
1436), retaining the requirements of [a] DGAC France AD * * *, which
was superseded, to require additional repetitive inspections. That
[DGAC] AD also included an optional terminating action, by replacing
the MLG door actuator fittings in accordance with the instructions
of Airbus Service Bulletin (SB) A320-52-1073.
    After DGAC France AD F-2003-434 was issued, in the framework of
the extended service goal campaign, it was decided to make
replacement of the MLG door actuator fittings a required
modification. Consequently, EASA issued AD 2014-0166 * * *,
retaining the requirements of DGAC France AD F-2003-434, which was
superseded, and requiring replacement of the MLG door actuator
fittings with new monoblock fittings, which constitutes terminating
action for the repetitive inspections.
    After EASA AD 2014-0166 [corresponding to the NPRM] was issued,
errors were identified in the compliance time definitions.
Replacement of the MLG door actuator fittings was required ``before
exceeding 48,000 flight cycles (FC) or 96,000 flight hours (FH),
whichever occurs later since aeroplane first flight'', which should
have been ``whichever occurs first''. Furthermore, since the MLG
door is an interchangeable part, the compliance time must be defined
as FC/FH accumulated by the MLG door. Furthermore, it was discovered
that one of the required inspection[s] is applicable only to a batch
of MLG door fittings.
    For the reason described above, this AD retains the requirements
of EASA AD 2014-0166, which is superseded, but requires
accomplishment of the terminating action within more stringent
compliance times, and reduce[s] the applicability of one of the
required inspection[s].

    You may examine the MCAI in the AD docket on the Internet at http://www.regulations.gov by searching for and locating Docket No. FAA-2016-
0461.

Related Service Information Under 1 CFR Part 51

    Airbus has issued the following service information:
     Airbus Service Bulletin A320-52-1073, Revision 04, dated
August 10, 1999.
     Airbus Service Bulletin A320-52-1073, Revision 05, dated
September 28, 2006.
     Airbus Service Bulletin A320-52A1086, Revision 01, dated
September 10, 1999.
     Airbus Service Bulletin A320-52-1096, Revision 02, dated
July 12, 2006.
    This service information describes procedures for inspections for
cracking of the MLG door actuator fitting and its components, and
corrective actions if necessary. This service information also
describes procedures for replacement of all affected MLG door actuator
fittings with new monoblock fittings. These documents are distinct
since they apply to different airplane models. This service information
is reasonably available because the interested parties have access to
it through their normal course of business or by the means identified
in the ADDRESSES section.

Comments

    We gave the public the opportunity to participate in developing
this proposed AD. We considered the comments received.

Support for the NPRM

    A commenter, Kevin Grandberry, stated that he supports the
inspections of the MLG door actuator fittings specified in the NPRM.

Request To Reduce the Compliance Time for Replacing the MLG Actuator
Fitting

    Airbus asked that we reduce the compliance time for the replacement
specified in paragraph (j)(1) of the proposed AD (in the NPRM) from
``whichever occurs later since the first flight of the airplane'' to
``whichever occurs first since the first flight of the airplane.''
Airbus stated that EASA updated EASA AD 2014-0166, dated July 16, 2014
(referenced in the NPRM), to correct the error noted in the compliance
time (among other changes).
    We agree with the commenter's request in light of the superseded
EASA AD, which corrects the compliance time. We have changed the
compliance time specified in paragraph (j)(1) of this proposed AD
accordingly.

Request To Change Applicability

    United Airlines (UA) asked that we limit the applicability of the
NPRM to the manufacturer serial numbers (MSNs) included in Airbus
Service Bulletin A320-52-1073, Revision 05, dated September 28, 2006.
UA did not provide a reason for the request.
    We do not agree with the commenter's request. The effectivity of
Airbus Service Bulletin A320-52-1073, Revision 05, dated September 28,
2006, is based on airplanes delivered with the affected parts. However,
the parts are rotable and could be installed on MSNs other than those
identified in Airbus Service Bulletin A320-52-1073, Revision 05, dated
September 28, 2006. Therefore, this AD applies to all airplanes
identified in paragraph (c) of this AD. We have not changed this
proposed AD in this regard.

Request for Credit for Previous Accomplishment of the Optional
Terminating Action

    UA asked that we give credit for modifying the airplane (as
specified in the optional terminating action in paragraph (k) of the
proposed AD (in the NPRM)) using Airbus Service Bulletin A320-52-1073,
Revision 04, dated August 10, 1999; or any prior revision. UA stated
that accomplishing any revisions (including future revisions) would
terminate the repetitive inspections required by paragraphs (g) and (h)
of the proposed AD.
    We partially agree with the request. We agree to include Airbus
Service Bulletin A320-52-1073, Revision 04, dated August 10, 1999, in
this proposed AD; however, we do not agree to allow the use of any
prior version because changes to the installation procedures were added
to Airbus Service Bulletin A320-52-1073, Revision 04, dated August 10,
1999, to prevent damage to the carbon fiber of the MLG door. We have
added Airbus Service Bulletin A320-52-1073, Revision 04, dated August
10, 1999, as a method of compliance for the optional terminating action
in paragraph (k) of this proposed AD.

Request To Extend the Compliance Time for the Inspections

    Delta Air Lines (DAL) asked that we extend the compliance time
specified in paragraphs (g) and (j)(2) of the proposed AD (in the
NPRM). DAL stated that the FAA waited years to take any action on the
subject unsafe condition and, in light of that fact, the ``calendar
date'' for the compliance time in paragraph (g) of the proposed AD (in
the NPRM) should be extended from 30 to 180 days. DAL also stated that
using a calendar date for a crack growth concern is not based on
industry-accepted analysis. DAL noted that mandating the inspections
with this short interval has a significant impact on operators with
multiple aircraft that are affected by the proposed AD. DAL added that
an immediate safety concern is not evident in the speed with which the
FAA moved to enact the regulatory action, or in the details provided in
the NPRM. In addition, DAL asked that the compliance time in paragraph
(j)(2) of the proposed AD (in the NPRM) be extended from 30 days to 24
months. DAL stated that operators would have difficulty complying with
the 30-day compliance time for replacing the MLG door actuator fitting
due to the extensive time necessary to modify each door. DAL added that
the replacement should be done in a hangar environment where skilled
composite facilities and

technicians are available, which occurs every 24 months.
    We do not agree with the commenter's requests. The compliance times
in paragraphs (g) and (j)(2) of this proposed AD are based on EASA's
assessment of the overall risk to the fleet, including the severity of
the failure and the likelihood of the failure to occur. We are unaware
of any information or data that substantiates the compliance time
change the commenter has requested, and nothing was provided by the
commenter to support the request. We also do not agree that FAA
requirements related to crack growth are based on calendar time. The
calendar time of 30 days, as retained in this proposed AD, is a grace
period to provide additional time for airplanes that have exceeded
their limit of validity of engineering data. All other compliance time
requirements are based on flight cycles and flight hours.
    We also note that since this is a SNPRM, operators will have
additional time to plan for AD compliance. However, under the
provisions of paragraph (n)(1) of this proposed AD, we will consider
requests for approval of an extension of the compliance time if
sufficient data are submitted to substantiate that the new compliance
time would provide an acceptable level of safety. We have not changed
this proposed AD in this regard.

Request To Include MLG Serial Numbers

    DAL asked that we change paragraph (h) of the proposed AD (in the
NPRM) to include the affected serial numbers of the left- and right-
hand doors of the MLG. DAL stated that paragraph (g) of the proposed AD
(in the NPRM) provides the door serial numbers to assist with
identifying the affected doors, and similar information should be
provided in paragraph (h) of the proposed AD (in the NPRM).
    We agree with the commenter's request. Paragraph (4) of EASA AD
2016-0182, dated September 13, 2016, which corresponds to paragraph (h)
of this proposed AD, identifies the affected serial numbers. It was not
our intent to deviate from the MCAI. We have added the serial numbers
to paragraph (h) of this proposed AD.

Request To Clarify Modification Titles

    UA asked that we clarify the language in paragraph (l) of the
proposed AD (in the NPRM) to add ``or Airbus Modification'' before each
modification number specified.
    We agree and have clarified paragraph (l) of this proposed AD
accordingly.

FAA's Determination and Requirements of This SNPRM

    This product has been approved by the aviation authority of another
country, and is approved for operation in the United States. Pursuant
to our bilateral agreement with the State of Design Authority, we have
been notified of the unsafe condition described in the MCAI and service
information referenced above. We are proposing this AD because we
evaluated all pertinent information and determined an unsafe condition
exists and is likely to exist or develop on other products of these
same type designs.
    Certain changes described above expand the scope of the NPRM. As a
result, we have determined that it is necessary to reopen the comment
period to provide additional opportunity for the public to comment on
this SNPRM.

Costs of Compliance

    We estimate that this proposed AD affects 71 airplanes of U.S.
registry.
    We also estimate that it would take about 38 work-hours per product
to comply with the inspection requirements of this proposed AD. The
average labor rate is $85 per work-hour. Based on these figures, we
estimate the cost for the inspection specified in this proposed AD on
U.S. operators to be $229,330, or $3,230 per product.
    We estimate that it would take about 98 work-hours per product to
comply with the MLG actuator replacement requirements of this proposed
AD. Required parts would cost about $6,258 per product. The average
labor rate is $85 per work-hour. Based on these figures, we estimate
the cost for the actuator replacement specified in this proposed AD on
U.S. operators to be $1,035,748, or $14,588 per product.

Authority for This Rulemaking

    Title 49 of the United States Code specifies the FAA's authority to
issue rules on aviation safety. Subtitle I, section 106, describes the
authority of the FAA Administrator. ``Subtitle VII: Aviation
Programs,'' describes in more detail the scope of the Agency's
authority.
    We are issuing this rulemaking under the authority described in
``Subtitle VII, Part A, Subpart III, Section 44701: General
requirements.'' Under that section, Congress charges the FAA with
promoting safe flight of civil aircraft in air commerce by prescribing
regulations for practices, methods, and procedures the Administrator
finds necessary for safety in air commerce. This regulation is within
the scope of that authority because it addresses an unsafe condition
that is likely to exist or develop on products identified in this
rulemaking action.

Regulatory Findings

    We determined that this proposed AD would not have federalism
implications under Executive Order 13132. This proposed AD would not
have a substantial direct effect on the States, on the relationship
between the national Government and the States, or on the distribution
of power and responsibilities among the various levels of government.
    For the reasons discussed above, I certify this proposed
regulation:
    1. Is not a ``significant regulatory action'' under Executive Order
12866;
    2. Is not a ``significant rule'' under the DOT Regulatory Policies
and Procedures (44 FR 11034, February 26, 1979);
    3. Will not affect intrastate aviation in Alaska; and
    4. Will not have a significant economic impact, positive or
negative, on a substantial number of small entities under the criteria
of the Regulatory Flexibility Act.

List of Subjects in 14 CFR Part 39

    Air transportation, Aircraft, Aviation safety, Incorporation by
reference, Safety.

The Proposed Amendment

    Accordingly, under the authority delegated to me by the
Administrator, the FAA proposes to amend 14 CFR part 39 as follows:

PART 39--AIRWORTHINESS DIRECTIVES

0
1. The authority citation for part 39 continues to read as follows:

    Authority: 49 U.S.C. 106(g), 40113, 44701.

Sec.  39.13  [Amended]

0
2. The FAA amends Sec.  39.13 by adding the following new airworthiness
directive (AD):

Airbus: Docket No. FAA-2016-0461; Directorate Identifier 2014-NM-
159-AD.

(a) Comments Due Date

    We must receive comments by May 22, 2017.

(b) Affected ADs

    None.

(c) Applicability

    This AD applies to the Airbus airplanes, certificated in any
category, identified in paragraphs (c)(1), (c)(2), and (c)(3) of
this AD, all manufacturer serial numbers.
    (1) Model A319-111, -112, -113, -114, -115, -131, -132, and -133
airplanes.
    (2) Model A320-211, -212, -214, -231, -232, and -233 airplanes.

    (3) Model A321-111, -112, -131, -211, -212, -213, -231, and -232
airplanes.

(d) Subject

    Air Transport Association (ATA) of America Code 52, Doors.

(e) Reason

    This AD was prompted by a report that a main landing gear (MLG)
door could not be closed due to rupture of the actuator fitting.
Later reports indicated that the forward monoblock fitting of the
MLG door actuator (referred to as the nerve area) could be damaged
after rupture of the actuator fitting. We are issuing this AD to
prevent rupture of the door actuator fittings, which could result in
detachment of an MLG door and subsequent exterior damage and
consequent reduced structural integrity of the airplane.

(f) Compliance

    Comply with this AD within the compliance times specified,
unless already done.

(g) Repetitive Inspections of MLG Door Actuator Fittings

    For airplanes equipped with MLG door actuator fittings having
part number (P/N) D52880224000 or P/N D52880224001 that were
installed before the first flight of the airplane on MLG doors
identified in paragraphs (g)(1) and (g)(2) of this AD: Within 500
flight hours since the most recent high frequency eddy current
(HFEC) inspection done as specified in Airbus Service Bulletin A320-
52A1086, Revision 01, dated September 10, 1999, or within 30 days
after the effective date of this AD, whichever occurs later, perform
an HFEC inspection for cracking of the MLG door fittings, in
accordance with the Accomplishment Instructions of Airbus Service
Bulletin A320-52A1086, Revision 01, dated September 10, 1999. Repeat
the inspection thereafter at intervals not to exceed 500 flight
hours, except as provided by paragraphs (i), (j), and (k) of this
AD.
    (1) Left-hand MLG doors with serial numbers (S/Ns) 1206 through
1237 inclusive, 1239 through 1247 inclusive, and 1249 through 1251
inclusive.
    (2) Right-hand MLG doors with S/Ns 1208 through 1239 inclusive,
1241 through 1249 inclusive, and 1251.

(h) Repetitive Inspections of MLG Hinge and Nerve Areas

    For airplanes equipped with MLG door actuator fittings having P/
N D52880224000, P/N D52880224001, P/N D52880235000, or P/N
D52880235001 that were installed before the first flight of the
airplane on MLG doors identified in paragraphs (h)(1) and (h)(2) of
this AD: Within 400 flight cycles after the effective date of this
AD, or before the accumulation of 9,000 total flight cycles since
first flight of the airplane, whichever occurs later, perform an
HFEC inspection of both hinge and nerve areas of the MLG doors for
cracking, in accordance with the Accomplishment Instructions of
Airbus Service Bulletin A320-52-1096, Revision 02, dated July 12,
2006. Repeat the inspection thereafter at intervals not to exceed
800 flight cycles, except as provided by paragraphs (i)(1), (j), and
(k) of this AD.
    (1) Left-hand MLG doors with S/Ns 1206 through 1510 inclusive,
1548, 1564, and 2000 through 2065 inclusive.
    (2) Right-hand MLG doors with S/Ns 1208 through 1519 inclusive,
1551, and 2000 through 2065 inclusive.

(i) Inspections/Corrective Actions

    (1) If any crack is found during any inspection required by
paragraph (g) or (h) of this AD: Before further flight, replace the
affected MLG door actuator fittings with new monoblock fittings, in
accordance with the Accomplishment Instructions of Airbus Service
Bulletin A320-52-1073, Revision 05, dated September 28, 2006.
Accomplishing this replacement terminates the repetitive inspections
required by paragraphs (g) and (h) of this AD.
    (2) If, during any HFEC inspection required by paragraph (g) of
this AD, no crack is found: Before further flight, perform a low
frequency eddy current (LFEC) inspection to determine the grain
direction of the raw material of each MLG actuator fitting, in
accordance with the Accomplishment Instructions of Airbus Service
Bulletin A320-52A1086, Revision 01, dated September 10, 1999.
    (i) If the grain direction of the raw material is correct, the
repetitive inspections required by paragraph (g) of this AD may be
terminated.
    (ii) If the grain direction of the raw material is incorrect,
repeat the HFEC inspection required by paragraph (g) of this AD at
the time specified in paragraph (g) of this AD. Replacement of the
MLG door actuator fittings with new monoblock fittings as specified
in paragraph (i)(1) of this AD terminates the repetitive inspections
required by paragraphs (g) and (i) of this AD.

(j) MLG Door Actuator Fitting Replacement

    For airplanes equipped with any MLG door actuator fitting having
P/N D52880102000, P/N D52880102001, P/N D52880220000, P/N
D52880220001, P/N D52880224000, P/N D52880224001, P/N D52880235000,
or P/N D52880235001: At the later of the times specified in
paragraphs (j)(1) and (j)(2) of this AD, replace the MLG door
actuator fittings with new monoblock fittings, in accordance with
the Accomplishment Instructions of Airbus Service Bulletin A320-52-
1073, Revision 05, dated September 28, 2006. Accomplishing this
replacement terminates the repetitive inspections required by
paragraphs (g) and (h) of this AD.
    (1) Before the accumulation of 48,000 total flight cycles or
96,000 total flight hours on the MLG door, whichever occurs first.
    (2) Within 30 days after the effective date of this AD.

(k) Optional Terminating Action

    Replacement of the MLG door actuator fittings with new monoblock
fittings, in accordance with the Accomplishment Instructions of
Airbus Service Bulletin A320-52-1073, Revision 04, dated August 10,
1999; or Airbus Service Bulletin A320-52-1073, Revision 05, dated
September 28, 2006; terminates the repetitive inspections required
by paragraphs (g) and (h) of this AD.

(l) Airplanes Excluded From Certain AD Requirements

    (1) For airplanes on which Airbus Modification 24903, or Airbus
Modification 25372, or Airbus Modification 36979 has been embodied
in production, no action is required by this AD, provided that no
MLG door actuator fitting having any part number identified in
paragraph (j) of this AD has been reinstalled on the airplane since
first flight.
    (2) Modification of an airplane by installing a version (P/N) of
the MLG door actuator fitting approved after the effective date of
this AD is acceptable for compliance with the requirements in
paragraph (j) of this AD, provided the conditions specified in
paragraphs (l)(2)(i) and (l)(2)(ii) are met.
    (i) The MLG door actuator fitting (P/N) must be approved by the
Manager, International Branch, ANM-116, Transport Airplane
Directorate, FAA; or the European Aviation Safety Agency (EASA); or
Airbus's EASA Design Organization Approval (DOA).
    (ii) The modification must be accomplished in accordance with
instructions approved by the Manager, International Branch, EASA, or
Airbus's EASA DOA.

(m) Parts Installation Limitation

    As of the effective date of this AD, no person may install an
MLG door actuator fitting having any part number identified in
paragraph (j) of this AD on any airplane.

(n) Other FAA AD Provisions

    The following provisions also apply to this AD:
    (1) Alternative Methods of Compliance (AMOCs): The Manager,
International Branch, ANM-116, Transport Airplane Directorate, FAA,
has the authority to approve AMOCs for this AD, if requested using
the procedures found in 14 CFR 39.19. In accordance with 14 CFR
39.19, send your request to your principal inspector or local Flight
Standards District Office, as appropriate. If sending information
directly to the International Branch, send it to ATTN: Sanjay
Ralhan, Aerospace Engineer, International Branch, ANM-116, Transport
Airplane Directorate, FAA, 1601 Lind Avenue SW., Renton, WA 98057-
3356; telephone<PHONE_NUMBER>; fax<PHONE_NUMBER>. Information may be
emailed to<EMAIL_ADDRESS>Before using any
approved AMOC, notify your appropriate principal inspector, or
lacking a principal inspector, the manager of the local flight
standards district office/certificate holding district office.
    (2) Contacting the Manufacturer: For any requirement in this AD
to obtain corrective actions from a manufacturer, the action must be
accomplished using a method approved by the Manager, International
Branch, ANM-116, Transport Airplane Directorate, FAA; or the EASA;
or Airbus's EASA Design Organization Approval (DOA). If approved by
the DOA, the approval must include the DOA-authorized signature.

(o) Related Information

    (1) Refer to Mandatory Continuing Airworthiness Information
(MCAI) EASA

Airworthiness Directive 2016-0182, dated September 13, 2016, for
related information. This MCAI may be found in the AD docket on the
Internet at http://www.regulations.gov by searching for and locating
Docket No. FAA-2016-0461.
    (2) For service information identified in this AD, contact
Airbus, Airworthiness Office--EIAS, 1 Rond Point Maurice Bellonte,
31707 Blagnac Cedex, France; telephone +33 5 61 93 36 96; fax +33 5
61 93 44 51; email<EMAIL_ADDRESS>Internet http://www.airbus.com. You may view this service information at the FAA,
Transport Airplane Directorate, 1601 Lind Avenue SW., Renton, WA.
For information on the availability of this material at the FAA,
call<PHONE_NUMBER>.

    Issued in Renton, Washington, on March 29, 2017.

Dionne Palermo,
Acting Manager, Transport Airplane Directorate, Aircraft Certification
Service.
[FR Doc. 2017-06705 Filed 4-6-17; 8:45 am]
 BILLING CODE 4910-13-P


[Federal Register: September 26, 2007 (Volume 72, Number 186)]
[Notices]
[Page 54649]
[DOCID:fr26se07-56]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission

[Docket No. TS04-286-003]

Exelon Corporation; Notice of Filing

September 19, 2007.
    Take notice that on September 12, 2007, Exelon Corporation, on
behalf of its subsidiary, Commonwealth energy Company, filed a request
for limited expansion of scope of an existing Standards of Conduct
waiver relating to provider-of-last resort service as a result of new
legislation by the State of Illinois.
    Any person desiring to intervene or to protest this filing must
file in accordance with Rules 211 and 214 of the Commission's Rules of
Practice and Procedure (18 CFR 385.211, 385.214). Protests will be
considered by the Commission in determining the appropriate action to
be taken, but will not serve to make protestants parties to the
proceeding. Any person wishing to become a party must file a notice of
intervention or motion to intervene, as appropriate. Such notices,
motions, or protests must be filed on or before the comment date.
Anyone filing a motion to intervene or protest must serve a copy of
that document on the Applicant and all the parties in this proceeding.
    The Commission encourages electronic submission of protests and
interventions in lieu of paper using the ``eFiling'' link at http://www.ferc.gov.
 Persons unable to file electronically should submit an

original and 14 copies of the protest or intervention to the Federal
Energy Regulatory Commission, 888 First Street, NE., Washington, DC
20426.
    This filing is accessible on-line at http://www.ferc.gov, using the

``eLibrary'' link and is available for review in the Commission's
Public Reference Room in Washington, DC. There is an ``eSubscription''
link on the Web site that enables subscribers to receive email
notification when a document is added to a subscribed docket(s). For
assistance with any FERC Online service, please e-mail
<EMAIL_ADDRESS>or call<PHONE_NUMBER> (toll free). For

TTY, call<PHONE_NUMBER>.
    Comment Date: 5 p.m. Eastern Time on October 12, 2007.

Kimberly D. Bose,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. E7-18905 Filed 9-25-07; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 6717-01-P


[Federal Register: May 13, 2008 (Volume 73, Number 93)]
[Notices]
[Page 27527]
[DOCID:fr13my08-28]

=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission

[Docket No. IC08-521-001, FERC-521]

Commission Information Collection Activities, Proposed
Collection; Comment Request; Submitted For OMB Review

May 6, 2008.
AGENCY: Federal Energy Regulatory Commission.

ACTION: Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: In compliance with the requirements of section 3507 of the
Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995, 44 U.S.C. 3507, the Federal Energy
Regulatory Commission (Commission) has submitted the information
collection described below to the Office of Management and Budget (OMB)
for review of this information collection requirement. Any interested
person may file comments directly with OMB and should address a copy of
those comments to the Commission as explained below. The Commission
received no comments in response to an earlier Federal Register notice
of February 19, 2008 (73 FR 9108-09) and has made this notation in its
submission to OMB.

DATES: Comments on the collection of information are due by June 9,
2008.

ADDRESSES: Address comments on the collection of information to the
Office of Management and Budget, Office of Information and Regulatory
Affairs, Attention: Federal Energy Regulatory Commission Desk Officer.
Comments to OMB should be filed electronically, c/o oira--
<EMAIL_ADDRESS>and include the OMB Control No. as a point of
reference. The Desk Officer may be reached by telephone at 202-395-
4650. A copy of the comments should also be sent to the Federal Energy
Regulatory Commission, Office of the Executive Director, ED-34,
Attention: Michael Miller, 888 First Street, NE., Washington, DC 20426.
Comments may be filed either in paper format or electronically. Those
persons filing electronically do not need to make a paper filing. For
paper filings, such comments should be submitted to the Office of the
Secretary, Federal Energy Regulatory Commission, 888 First Street, NE.,
Washington, DC 20426 and should refer to Docket No. IC08-521-001.
    Documents filed electronically via the Internet must be prepared in
the acceptable filing format and in compliance with the Federal Energy
Regulatory Commission's submission guidelines. Complete filing
instructions and acceptable filing formats are available at (http://
www.ferc.gov/help/submission-guide/electronic-media.asp). To file the
document electronically, access the Commission's Web site at http://
www.ferc.gov/docs-filing/efiling.asp), and then follow the instructions
for each screen. First time users will have to establish a user name
and password. The Commission will send an automatic acknowledgement to
the sender's e-mail address upon receipt of comments.
    All comments may be viewed, printed or downloaded remotely via the
Internet through FERC's homepage using the eLibrary link. For user
assistance, contact<EMAIL_ADDRESS>or toll-free at (866)
208-3676 or for TTY, contact<PHONE_NUMBER>.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Michael Miller may be reached by
telephone at<PHONE_NUMBER>, by fax at<PHONE_NUMBER>, and by e-mail at
<EMAIL_ADDRESS>
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

Description

    The information collection submitted for OMB review contains the
following:
    1. Collection of Information: FERC-521 ``Payments for Benefits from
Headwater Improvements''.
    2. Sponsor: Federal Energy Regulatory Commission.
    3. Control No.: 1902-0087.
    The Commission is now requesting that OMB approve with a three-year
extension of the expiration date, with no changes to the existing
collection. The information filed with the Commission is mandatory.
    4. Necessity of the Collection of Information: The information is
used by the Commission to implement the statutory provisions of section
10(f) of the Federal Power Act (FPA). The FPA authorizes the Commission
to determine headwater benefits received by downstream hydropower
project owners. Headwater benefits are the additional energy production
possible at a downstream hydropower project resulting from the
regulation of river flows by an upstream storage reservoir.
    When the Commission completes a study of a river basin, it
determines headwater benefits charges that will be apportioned among
the various downstream beneficiaries. A headwater benefits charge, and
the cost incurred by the Commission to complete an evaluation are paid
by downstream hydropower project owners. In essence, the owners of non-
federal hydropower power projects that directly benefit from a
headwater(s) improvement must pay an equitable portion of the annual
charges for interest, maintenance, and depreciation of the headwater
project to the U.S. Treasury. The regulations provide for the
apportionment of these costs between the headwater project and
downstream projects based on a downstream energy gains and propose
equitable apportionment methodology that can be applied to all river
basins in which headwater improvements are built. The data the
Commission requires owners of non-federal hydropower projects to file
for determining annual charges is specified in 18 Code of Federal
Regulations (CFR) Part 11.
    5. Respondent Description: The Commission estimates that it will
receive annually on average 3 filings per year.
    6. Estimated Burden: 120 total hours, 3 respondents (average per
year), 1 response per respondent, and .40 hours per response (average).
    7. Estimated Cost Burden to respondents: The estimated total cost
to respondents is $7,291. (120 hours / 2080 x $126,384.)

    Statutory Authority: Section 10(f) of the Federal Power Act, 16
U.S.C. 803.

Kimberly D. Bose,
Secretary.
 [FR Doc. E8-10611 Filed 5-12-08; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 6717-01-P


( i) A State that has flagged data as being due to an exceptional event shall, after notice and opportunity for public comment, submit a complete demonstration to EPA in support of its request for exclusion not later than 3 years following the end of the calendar quarter in which the flagged concentration was recorded.

( 4) EPA review and concurrence or nonconcurrence ( i) EPA shall complete its review and concur or nonconcur with a State's request for exclusion not later than 30 days following receipt of a complete submission from the State. EPA shall notify the State of its concurrence or 103 nonconcurrence by placing a flag in the appropriate field for the data record in the AQS database.

A. Extensions. Where additional time is needed to complete its review of the States demonstration, EPA may extend the time for review by not more than an additional 30 days.

B. [ Reserved]

OPTION 3 for paragraph ( c)( 2):

( 2) Flagging of data.

( i) A State shall notify EPA of its intent to exclude one or more measured exceedances of an applicable ambient air quality standard as being due to an exceptional event by placing a flag in the appropriate field for the data record of concern not later than 180 days prior to the date on which EPA intends to propose determinations with respect to violations of applicable national ambient air quality standards.

( ii) Flags placed on data in accordance with this section shall be deemed informational only, and the data shall not be excluded from 104 determinations with respect to exceedances or violations of the national ambient air quality standards unless and until EPA notifies the State of its concurrence by placing a concurrence flag in the appropriate field for the data record in the AQS database.

( 3) Submission of demonstrations.

( i) A State that has flagged data as being due to an exceptional event shall, after notice and opportunity for public comment, submit a complete demonstration to EPA in support of its request for exclusion not later than 180 days prior to the date on which EPA intends to propose determinations with respect to violations of applicable national ambient air quality standards.

( 4) EPA review and concurrence or nonconcurrence ( i) EPA shall complete its review and concur or nonconcur with a State's request for exclusion not later than 30 days following receipt of a complete submission from the State. EPA shall notify the State of its concurrence or nonconcurrence by placing a flag in the appropriate field for the data record in the AQS 105 database.

A. Extensions. Where additional time is needed to complete its review of the States demonstration, EPA may extend the time for review by not more than an additional 30 days.

B. [ Reserved]

PART 51 NATIONAL PRIMARY AND SECONDARY NATIONAL AMBIENT AIR QUALITY STANDARDS 1. The authority citation for part 51 continues to read as follows:

Authority: 42 U. S. C. 7401, et seq.

2. Adding Amend § 51._ as follows OPTION 1 ( Proposed Option) for § 51.__:

§ 51.__ Mitigation of Exceptional Events.

( a) As a condition for EPA's approval of a request to exclude air quality data due to exceptional events from use, each State must take appropriate and reasonable actions to protect public health from 106 exceedances or violations of the national ambient air quality standards due to exceptional events. The State must:

( 1) Provide for prompt public notification whenever air quality concentrations exceed or are expected to exceed an applicable ambient air quality standard.

( 2) Provide for public education concerning actions that individuals may take to reduce exposures to unhealthy levels of air quality during and following an exceptional event.

( 3) Provide for the implementation of reasonable measures to protect public health from exceedances or violations of ambient air quality standards caused by exceptional events.

( b) [ Reserved]

OPTION 2 for § 51.__:

§ 51.__ Mitigation of Exceptional Events.

( a) As a condition for EPA's approval of a request to exclude air quality data due to exceptional events from use, each plan must include a mitigation action plan which provides for appropriate actions to protect public health from exceedances or violations of the 107 107 national ambient air quality standards due to exceptional events. Each mitigation action plan must:

( 1) Provide for prompt public notification whenever air quality concentrations exceed or are expected to exceed an applicable ambient air quality standard.

( 2) Provide for public education concerning actions that individuals may take to reduce exposures to unhealthy levels of air quality during and following an exceptional event.

( 3) Describe the procedures by which appropriate actions will be identified and taken to prevent or mitigate public health threats associated with exceptional events.

( 4) Provide for the implementation of reasonably available control measures to reduce emissions from those anthropogenic sources which are not exempt under § 50.13( a)( 1)( ii) and which interact with recurring natural events to contribute to exceedances or violations of applicable national ambient air quality standards.

( b) States should periodically reevaluate mitigation action plans for adequacy and revise them as necessary and appropriate. 108 108 OPTION 3 for § 51.__:

§ 51.__ Mitigation of Exceptional Events.

( a) As a condition for EPA's approval of a request to exclude air quality data due to exceptional events from use in determinations with respect to exceedances or violations of the national ambient air quality standards, each State must adopt and implement a mitigation action plan for an affected area which provides for appropriate actions to protect public health from exceedances or violations of national ambient air quality standards due to exceptional events which is to be implemented in an affected area on an episodic basis. Mitigation action plans need not be incorporated into the applicable implementation plan, but each mitigation action plan must:

( 1) Provide for prompt public notification whenever air quality concentrations exceed or are expected to exceed an applicable ambient air quality standard.

( 2) Provide for public education concerning actions that individuals may take to reduce exposures to unhealthy levels of air quality during and following an exceptional event. 109 109 ( 3) Describe the procedures by which appropriate actions will be identified and taken to prevent or mitigate public health threats associated with exceptional events.

( 4) Provide for the implementation of reasonably available control measures to reduce emissions from those anthropogenic sources which are not exempt under § 50.13( a)( 1)( ii) and which interact with recurring natural events to contribute to exceedances or violations of applicable national ambient air quality standards.

( b) States should periodically reevaluate mitigation action plans for adequacy and revise them as necessary and appropriate.


                                    Attachment A
     Summary of Consultations for the Renewal ICR, entitled "Agricultural Worker Protection Standard Training, Notification and Recordkeeping"
     OMB Control No.: 2070-0190; EPA ICR No.: 2491.04; Docket No. EPA-HQ-OPP-2018-0031

Representatives were contacted from the following organizations:
 BlackBerry Bottom Farm 	(Blackberry farm)
 Greenwood Mushroom 	(Mushroom operation)
 Green Leaf Plants 		(Greenhouse operation)
 Shannon Farm Services 	(Orchard grower & Consultant)
Of the four representatives contacted, Shannon Farm Services provided responses to our consultation questionnaire. The questions asked, and the responses received, are provided below.

Questionnaire and Responses:

 Clarity of Instructions

     The ICR is intended to require that respondents provide certain data so that the Agency can utilize them.

 Based on the instructions (regulations, PR Notices, etc.), is it clear what you are required to do? If not, what suggestions do you have to clarify the instructions?

	The instructions are clear but a simple list without the legal fluff would be better.

 Do you understand that you are required to maintain certain records - for example, records of pesticide safety training for workers and handlers, pesticide application information, and respirator fit testing, medical evaluations, and training for handlers?

        I believe that the record keeping requirements are clear and as a consultant I give my growers a simple sheet with most of the requirements except their actual start and stop times and the acres treated, (in some cases) as well as the total amount of product used.  There is however a lot of confusion around the respirator fit test and the ability to find a third-party testing facility to administer the test.

 Considering that there is no required format for recordkeeping, is it difficult to record the information in ways that are clear, logical and easy to complete?

The basic record keeping requirements are easy to follow but an `APP" to record some specific info would be helpful.

 Electronic Record keeping

 What do you think about electronic alternatives to paper-based records?

        Electronic alternatives to paper based formats would be helpful but they need to be versatile to various sized operations.  Some programs available now are too complicated and require inputting a lot of info that makes them more difficult to use.

 Are you keeping your records electronically? If yes, in what format?

        I currently use an Excel format that a friend of mine developed.  I have tried Agrian for myself and my growers but I am burdened by the amount of info required prior to making a recommendation.

 What benefits would electronic recordkeeping bring you in terms of burden reduction or greater efficiency in compiling the information?

        Ideally an electronic format with drop down choices would be helpful but their needs to be a simplistic approach and the ability to duplicate multiple farms and have flexible application options.  For example, in the Mid Atlantic fruit growers spray Alternate Row Middles (ARM), which is foreign to some people in other parts of the country but a normal practice here.

 Burden and Costs

 Are the labor rates accurate?

  Some programs cost money.

 The Agency assumes there is no capital cost associated with this activity. Is that correct?

        It would be different at different operations depending on the size of the operation and the diversity of the operation.

 Bearing in mind that the burden and cost estimates include only burden hours and costs associated with the paperwork involved with this ICR (e.g., the ICR does not include estimated burden hours and costs for conducting studies), are the estimated burden hours and costs accurate?  If you provide burden and cost estimates
        that are substantially different from EPA's estimates, please provide an explanation of how you arrived at your estimates.

        No response provided.

 Are there other costs that should be accounted for that may have been missed?

Loss of productivity doing things on the farm that make money rather than cost money rather than more paper work.  Growers are continually being hit with more regulations from WPS requirements to food safety that are not required by their foreign competitors.  It is not level playing field.  Due to this additional paperwork some operations are hiring more people to allow them to comply while they struggle to find help to pick their product.  And some of the regulations are ridiculous for example why does a grower need to post a field during an REI if the employee is required to go to the central posting location prior to entering the farm?  Why can't there be a list of fields not to enter at the central posting location.  The workers need to share some responsibility for their safety as well.


[Federal Register Volume 86, Number 88 (Monday, May 10, 2021)]
[Proposed Rules]
[Pages 24786-24789]
[FR Doc No: 2021-09761]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION

Federal Aviation Administration

14 CFR Part 39

[Docket No. FAA-2021-0331; Project Identifier AD-2020-01703-T]
RIN 2120-AA64

Airworthiness Directives; The Boeing Company Airplanes

AGENCY: Federal Aviation Administration (FAA), DOT.

ACTION: Notice of proposed rulemaking (NPRM).

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The FAA proposes to adopt a new airworthiness directive (AD)
for all The Boeing Company Model 757 airplanes. This proposed AD was
prompted by significant changes, including new or more restrictive
requirements, made to the airworthiness limitations (AWLs) related to
fuel tank ignition prevention and the nitrogen generation system. This
proposed AD would require revising the existing maintenance or
inspection program, as applicable, to incorporate new or more
restrictive airworthiness limitations. The FAA is proposing this AD to
address the unsafe condition on these products.

DATES: The FAA must receive comments on this proposed AD by June 24,
2021.

ADDRESSES: You may send comments, using the procedures found in 14 CFR
11.43 and 11.45, by any of the following methods:
     Federal eRulemaking Portal: Go to https://www.regulations.gov. Follow the instructions for submitting comments.
     Fax:<PHONE_NUMBER>.
     Mail: U.S. Department of Transportation, Docket
Operations, M-30, West Building Ground Floor, Room W12-140, 1200 New
Jersey Avenue SE, Washington, DC 20590.
     Hand Delivery: Deliver to Mail address above between 9
a.m. and 5 p.m., Monday through Friday, except Federal holidays.
    For service information identified in this NPRM, contact Boeing
Commercial Airplanes, Attention: Contractual & Data Services (C&DS),
2600 Westminster Blvd., MC 110-SK57, Seal Beach, CA 90740-5600;
telephone<PHONE_NUMBER>; internet https://www.myboeingfleet.com. You may
view this service information at the FAA, Airworthiness Products
Section, Operational Safety Branch, 2200 South 216th St., Des Moines,
WA. For information on the availability of this material at the FAA,
call<PHONE_NUMBER>.

Examining the AD Docket

    You may examine the AD docket at https://www.regulations.gov by
searching for and locating Docket No. FAA-2021-0331; or in person at
Docket Operations between 9 a.m. and 5 p.m., Monday through Friday,
except Federal holidays. The AD docket contains this NPRM, any comments
received, and other information. The street address for Docket
Operations is listed above.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Tak Kobayashi, Aerospace Engineer,
Propulsion Section, FAA, Seattle ACO Branch, 2200 South 216th St., Des
Moines, WA 98198; phone and fax:<PHONE_NUMBER>; email:
<EMAIL_ADDRESS>
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

Comments Invited

    The FAA invites you to send any written relevant data, views, or
arguments about this proposal. Send your comments to an address listed
under ADDRESSES. Include ``Docket No.

FAA-2021-0331; Project Identifier AD-2020-01703-T'' at the beginning of
your comments. The most helpful comments reference a specific portion
of the proposal, explain the reason for any recommended change, and
include supporting data. The FAA will consider all comments received by
the closing date and may amend this proposal because of those comments.
    Except for Confidential Business Information (CBI) as described in
the following paragraph, and other information as described in 14 CFR
11.35, the FAA will post all comments received, without change, to
https://www.regulations.gov, including any personal information you
provide. The agency will also post a report summarizing each
substantive verbal contact received about this NPRM.

Confidential Business Information

    CBI is commercial or financial information that is both customarily
and actually treated as private by its owner. Under the Freedom of
Information Act (FOIA) (5 U.S.C. 552), CBI is exempt from public
disclosure. If your comments responsive to this NPRM contain commercial
or financial information that is customarily treated as private, that
you actually treat as private, and that is relevant or responsive to
this NPRM, it is important that you clearly designate the submitted
comments as CBI. Please mark each page of your submission containing
CBI as ``PROPIN.'' The FAA will treat such marked submissions as
confidential under the FOIA, and they will not be placed in the public
docket of this NPRM. Submissions containing CBI should be sent to Tak
Kobayashi, Aerospace Engineer, Propulsion Section, FAA, Seattle ACO
Branch, 2200 South 216th St., Des Moines, WA 98198; phone and fax: 206-
231-3553; email<EMAIL_ADDRESS>Any commentary that the
FAA receives which is not specifically designated as CBI will be placed
in the public docket for this rulemaking.

Background

    The FAA has examined the underlying safety issues involved in fuel
tank explosions on several large transport airplanes, including the
adequacy of existing regulations, the service history of airplanes
subject to those regulations, and existing maintenance practices for
fuel tank systems. As a result of those findings, the FAA issued a
final rule titled ``Transport Airplane Fuel Tank System Design Review,
Flammability Reduction, and Maintenance and Inspection Requirements''
(66 FR 23086, May 7, 2001). In addition to new airworthiness standards
for transport airplanes and new maintenance requirements that rule
included Amendment 21-78, which established Special Federal Aviation
Regulation No. 88 (``SFAR 88'') to 14 CFR part 21. Subsequently, SFAR
88 was amended by: Amendment 21-82 (67 FR 57490, September 10, 2002;
corrected at 67 FR 70809, November 26, 2002), Amendment 21-83 (67 FR
72830, December 9, 2002; corrected at 68 FR 37735, June 25, 2003, to
change ``21-82'' to ``21-83''), and Amendment 21-101 (83 FR 9162, March
5, 2018).
    Among other actions, SFAR 88 requires certain type design (i.e.,
type certificate (TC) and supplemental type certificate (STC)) holders
to substantiate that their fuel tank systems can prevent ignition
sources in the fuel tanks. This requirement applies to type design
holders for large turbine-powered transport airplanes and for
subsequent modifications to those airplanes. It requires them to
perform design reviews and to develop design changes and maintenance
procedures if their designs do not meet the new fuel tank safety
standards. As explained in the preamble to the final rule published on
May 7, 2001, the FAA intended to adopt airworthiness directives to
mandate any changes found necessary to address unsafe conditions
identified as a result of these reviews.
    In evaluating these design reviews, the FAA has established four
criteria intended to define the unsafe conditions associated with fuel
tank systems that require corrective actions. The percentage of
operating time during which fuel tanks are exposed to flammable
conditions is one of these criteria. The other three criteria address
the failure types under evaluation: Single failures, single failures in
combination with another latent condition(s), and in-service failure
experience. For all four criteria, the evaluations included
consideration of previous actions taken that may mitigate the need for
further action.
    The FAA issued AD 2012-12-15, Amendment 39-17095 (77 FR 42964, July
23, 2012) (AD 2012-12-15), which applies to all The Boeing Company
Model 757 airplanes. AD 2012-12-15 requires revising the maintenance or
inspection program to incorporate new limitations for fuel tank
systems. AD 2012-12-15 also requires the initial inspection of certain
repetitive AWL inspections to phase-in those inspections, and repair if
necessary. Since the FAA issued AD 2012-12-15, the Airworthiness
Limitations Section (ALS) of the Instructions for Continued
Airworthiness (Boeing document D622N001-9) has been significantly
revised by the manufacturer to correct technical and editorial errors
and also to add new or more restrictive requirements. Many of those
changes are related to fuel tank ignition prevention and the nitrogen
generation system. Incorporating the revision required by this proposed
AD would terminate all the requirements of AD 2012-12-15.
    The FAA also issued AD 2018-20-13, Amendment 39-19447 (83 FR 52305,
October 17, 2018) (2018-20-13), which applies to all The Boeing Company
Model 757 airplanes; Model 737 airplanes, excluding Model 737-100, -
200, -200C, -300, -400, and -500 series airplanes; and Model 767-200, -
300, -300F, and -400ER series airplanes. For Model 757 airplanes, AD
2018-20-13 requires, among other things, revising the maintenance or
inspection program to incorporate AWLs No. 28-AWL-23, 28-AWL-24, and
28-AWL-25. Since the FAA issued 2018-20-13, those AWLs have been
revised, therefore, this proposed AD would require the incorporation of
those revised AWLs. Incorporating the revision required by this
proposed AD would terminate the requirements in paragraph (i)(2) of AD
2018-20-13.
    The FAA has assessed the changes, including new or more restrictive
requirements, that were made to the AWLs related to fuel tank ignition
prevention and the nitrogen generation system. The FAA is issuing this
AD to address ignition sources inside the fuel tanks and the increased
flammability exposure of the center fuel tank caused by latent
failures, alterations, repairs, or maintenance actions, which could
result in a fuel tank explosion and consequent loss of an airplane.

FAA's Determination

    The FAA is issuing this NPRM after determining that the unsafe
condition described previously is likely to exist or develop on other
products of the same type design.

Related Service Information Under 1 CFR Part 51

    The FAA reviewed Section 9, Airworthiness Limitations (AWLs) and
Certification Maintenance Requirements (CMRs), of Boeing 757
Maintenance Planning Data (MPD) Document, D622N001-9, dated March 2020.
This service information specifies airworthiness limitation instruction
(ALI) and critical design configuration control limitation (CDCCL)
tasks related to fuel tank ignition prevention and the nitrogen
generation system.

    This service information is reasonably available because the
interested parties have access to it through their normal course of
business or by the means identified in ADDRESSES.

Proposed AD Requirements in This NPRM

    This proposed AD would require revising the existing maintenance or
inspection program, as applicable, to incorporate new or more
restrictive airworthiness limitations.
    This proposed AD would require revisions to certain operator
maintenance documents to include new actions (e.g., inspections) and
CDCCLs. Compliance with these actions and CDCCLs is required by 14 CFR
91.403(c). For airplanes that have been previously modified, altered,
or repaired in the areas addressed by this proposed AD, the operator
may not be able to accomplish the actions described in the revisions.
In this situation, to comply with 14 CFR 91.403(c), the operator must
request approval for an alternative method of compliance according to
paragraph (k) of this proposed AD.

Differences Between This Proposed AD and the Service Information

    Paragraph (g) of this proposed AD would require operators to revise
their existing maintenance or inspection program by incorporating, in
part, AWL No. 28-AWL-05, ``Wire Separation Requirements for New Wiring
Installed in Proximity to Wiring that Goes into the Fuel Tanks,'' of
Section 9, Airworthiness Limitations (AWLs) and Certification
Maintenance Requirements (CMRs), of Boeing 757 Maintenance Planning
Data (MPD) Document, D622N001-9, dated March 2020.
    Paragraph (h) of this proposed AD would allow certain changes to be
made to the requirements specified in AWL No. 28-AWL-05 as an option.
Where AWL No. 28-AWL-05 identifies certain wire types for routing and
installation of any new wiring under certain conditions, paragraph (h)
of this proposed AD provides acceptable alternative wire types. Where
AWL No. 28-AWL-05 identifies certain wiring sleeve material for new
wiring installed under certain conditions, paragraph (h) of this
proposed AD provides acceptable alternative wire sleeve materials.

Costs of Compliance

    The FAA estimates that this AD, if adopted as proposed, would
affect 493 airplanes of U.S. registry. The FAA estimates the following
costs to comply with this proposed AD:
    The FAA has determined that revising the existing maintenance or
inspection program takes an average of 90 work-hours per operator,
although the agency recognizes that this number may vary from operator
to operator. Since operators incorporate maintenance or inspection
program changes for their affected fleet(s), the FAA has determined
that a per-operator estimate is more accurate than a per-airplane
estimate. Therefore, the FAA estimates the average total cost per
operator to be $7,650 (90 work-hours x $85 per work-hour).

Authority for This Rulemaking

    Title 49 of the United States Code specifies the FAA's authority to
issue rules on aviation safety. Subtitle I, section 106, describes the
authority of the FAA Administrator. Subtitle VII: Aviation Programs,
describes in more detail the scope of the Agency's authority.
    The FAA is issuing this rulemaking under the authority described in
Subtitle VII, Part A, Subpart III, Section 44701: General requirements.
Under that section, Congress charges the FAA with promoting safe flight
of civil aircraft in air commerce by prescribing regulations for
practices, methods, and procedures the Administrator finds necessary
for safety in air commerce. This regulation is within the scope of that
authority because it addresses an unsafe condition that is likely to
exist or develop on products identified in this rulemaking action.

Regulatory Findings

    The FAA determined that this proposed AD would not have federalism
implications under Executive Order 13132. This proposed AD would not
have a substantial direct effect on the States, on the relationship
between the national Government and the States, or on the distribution
of power and responsibilities among the various levels of government.
    For the reasons discussed above, I certify this proposed
regulation:
    (1) Is not a ``significant regulatory action'' under Executive
Order 12866,
    (2) Would not affect intrastate aviation in Alaska, and
    (3) Would not have a significant economic impact, positive or
negative, on a substantial number of small entities under the criteria
of the Regulatory Flexibility Act.

List of Subjects in 14 CFR Part 39

    Air transportation, Aircraft, Aviation safety, Incorporation by
reference, Safety.

The Proposed Amendment

    Accordingly, under the authority delegated to me by the
Administrator, the FAA proposes to amend 14 CFR part 39 as follows:

PART 39--AIRWORTHINESS DIRECTIVES

0
1. The authority citation for part 39 continues to read as follows:

    Authority:  49 U.S.C. 106(g), 40113, 44701.

Sec.  39.13  [Amended]

0
2. The FAA amends Sec.  39.13 by adding the following new airworthiness
directive:

The Boeing Company: Docket No. FAA-2021-0331; Project Identifier AD-
2020-01703-T.

(a) Comments Due Date

    The FAA must receive comments on this airworthiness directive
(AD) by June 24, 2021.

(b) Affected ADs

    This AD affects the ADs specified in paragraphs (b)(1) and (2)
of this AD.
    (1) AD 2012-12-15, Amendment 39-17095 (77 FR 42964, July 23,
2012) (AD 2012-12-15).
    (2) AD 2018-20-13, Amendment 39-19447 (83 FR 52305, October 17,
2018).

(c) Applicability

    This AD applies to all The Boeing Company Model 757-200, -200PF,
-200CB, and -300 series airplanes, certificated in any category.

(d) Subject

    Air Transport Association (ATA) of America Code 28, Fuel.

(e) Unsafe Condition

    This AD was prompted by significant changes, including new or
more restrictive requirements, made to the airworthiness limitations
(AWLs) related to fuel tank ignition prevention and the nitrogen
generation system. The FAA is issuing this AD to address ignition
sources inside the fuel tanks and the increased flammability
exposure of the center fuel tank caused by latent failures,
alterations, repairs, or maintenance actions, which could result in
a fuel tank explosion and consequent loss of an airplane.

(f) Compliance

    Comply with this AD within the compliance times specified,
unless already done.

(g) Maintenance or Inspection Program Revision

    Within 60 days after the effective date of this AD, revise the
existing maintenance or inspection program, as applicable, to
incorporate the information specified in Section E. ``Airworthiness
Limitations--Systems,'' including Subsections E.1 and E.3, of
Section 9, Airworthiness Limitations (AWLs) and Certification
Maintenance

Requirements (CMRs), of Boeing 757 Maintenance Planning Data (MPD)
Document, D622N001-9, dated March 2020; except as provided by
paragraph (h) of this AD. The initial compliance time for doing the
airworthiness limitation instruction (ALI) tasks is at the times
specified in paragraphs (g)(1) through (12) of this AD.
    (1) For AWL No. 28-AWL-01, ``External Wires Over Center Fuel
Tank'': Within 120 months after the most recent inspection was
performed as specified in AWL No. 28-AWL-01.
    (2) For AWL No. 28-AWL-03, ``Fuel Quantity Indicating System
(FQIS)--Out Tank Wiring Lightning Shield to Ground Termination'':
Within 120 months after the most recent inspection was performed as
specified in AWL No. 28-AWL-03.
    (3) For AWL No. 28-AWL-14, ``Main and Center Wing Tank Fueling
Shutoff Valve Body and Actuator--Fault Current Bond'': Within 120
months after the most recent inspection was performed as specified
in AWL No. 28-AWL-14.
    (4) For AWL No. 28-AWL-20, ``Center Tank Fuel Override Boost
Pump Automatic Shutoff System'': Within 12 months after
accomplishment of the actions specified in Boeing Service Bulletin
757-28A0081 or Boeing Service Bulletin 757-28A0082, as applicable;
or within 12 months after the most recent inspection was performed
as specified in AWL No. 28-AWL-20; whichever occurs later.
    (5) For AWL No. 28-AWL-21, ``Over-Current and Arcing Protection
Electrical Design Features Operation--Boost Pump Ground Fault
Interrupter (GFI)'': Within 12 months after accomplishment of the
actions specified in Boeing Service Bulletin 757-28A0078 or Boeing
Service Bulletin 757-28A0079, as applicable; or within 12 months
after the most recent inspection was performed as specified in AWL
No. 28-AWL-21; whichever occurs later.
    (6) For AWL No. 28-AWL-25, ``Motor Operated Valve (MOV)
Actuator--Lightning and Fault Current Protection Electrical Bond'':
Within 72 months after accomplishment of the actions specified in
Boeing Service Bulletin 757-28A0088, or within 72 months after the
most recent inspection was performed as specified in AWL No. 28-AWL-
25, whichever occurs later.
    (7) For AWL No. 28-AWL-26, ``Center Tank Fuel Boost Pump Power
Failed On Protection System'': Within 12 months after accomplishment
of the actions specified in Boeing Service Bulletin 757-28A0105, or
within 12 months after the most recent inspection was performed as
specified in AWL No. 28-AWL-26, whichever occurs later.
    (8) For AWL No. 28-AWL-30, ``AC Fuel Pump Fault Current Bonding
Jumper Installation, Main and Center Tank'': Within 24 months after
the effective date of this AD, or within 72 months after the most
recent inspection was performed as specified in AWL No. 28-AWL-30,
whichever occurs later.
    (9) For AWL No. 28-AWL-33, ``Full Cushion Clamps and Teflon
Sleeving Installed on Out-of-Tank Wire Bundles Installed on Brackets
that are Mounted Directly on the Fuel Tanks'': Within 24 months
after the effective date of this AD; or within 144 months after
accomplishment of the actions specified in Boeing Service Bulletin
757-57A0064 (Part 2 through Part 10 of the Work Instructions); or
within 144 months since the most recent inspection was performed as
specified in AWL No. 28-AWL-33; whichever occurs later.
    (10) For AWL No. 47-AWL-04, ``NGS--NEA Distribution Ducting'':
Within 17,300 flight hours after accomplishment of the actions
specified in Boeing Service Bulletin 757-47-0001 or Boeing Service
Bulletin757-47-0005, as applicable; or within 17,300 flight hours
after the most recent inspection was performed as specified in AWL
No. 47-AWL-04; whichever occurs later.
    (11) For AWL No. 47-AWL-05, ``NGS--Cross Vent Check Valve'':
Within 17,300 flight hours after accomplishment of the actions
specified in Boeing Service Bulletin 757-47-0001 or Boeing Service
Bulletin 757-47-0005, as applicable; or within 17,300 flight hours
after the most recent inspection was performed as specified in AWL
No. 47-AWL-05; whichever occurs later.
    (12) For AWL No. 47-AWL-07, ``NGS--Thermal Switch'': Within
48,000 flight hours after accomplishment of the actions specified in
Boeing Service Bulletin 757-47-0001 or Boeing Service Bulletin 757-
47-0005, as applicable; or within 48,000 flight hours after the most
recent inspection was performed as specified in AWL No. 47-AWL-07;
whichever occurs later.

(h) Additional Acceptable Wire Types and Sleeving

    As an option, when accomplishing the actions required by
paragraph (g) of this AD, the alternatives specified in paragraphs
(h)(1) and (2) of this AD are acceptable.
    (1) Where AWL No. 28-AWL-05 identifies wire types BMS 13-48, BMS
13-58, and BMS 13-60, the following wire types are acceptable: MIL-
W-22759/16, SAE AS22759/16 (M22759/16), MIL-W-22759/32, SAE AS22759/
32 (M22759/32), MIL-W-22759/34, SAE AS22759/34 (M22759/34), MIL-W-
22759/41, SAE AS22759/41 (M22759/41), MIL-W-22759/86, SAE AS22759/86
(M22759/86), MIL-W-22759/87, SAE AS22759/87 (M22759/87), MIL-W-
22759/92, and SAE AS22759/92 (M22759/92); and MIL-C-27500 and NEMA
WC 27500 cables constructed from these military or SAE specification
wire types, as applicable.
    (2) Where AWL No. 28-AWL-05 identifies TFE-2X Standard wall for
wire sleeving, the following sleeving materials are acceptable:
Roundit 2000NX and Varglas Type HO, HP, or HM.

(i) No Alternative Actions, Intervals, or CDCCLs

    After the existing maintenance or inspection program has been
revised as required by paragraph (g) of this AD, no alternative
actions (e.g., inspections), intervals, or CDCCLs may be used unless
the actions, intervals, and CDCCLs are approved as an alternative
method of compliance (AMOC) in accordance with the procedures
specified in paragraph (k) of this AD.

(j) Terminating Actions for Certain AD Requirements

    Accomplishment of the revision required by paragraph (g) of this
AD terminates the requirements specified in paragraphs (j)(1) and
(2) of this AD for that airplane.
    (1) All requirements of AD 2012-12-15.
    (2) The requirements in paragraph (i)(2) of AD 2018-20-13.

(k) Alternative Methods of Compliance (AMOCs)

    (1) The Manager, Seattle ACO Branch, FAA, has the authority to
approve AMOCs for this AD, if requested using the procedures found
in 14 CFR 39.19. In accordance with 14 CFR 39.19, send your request
to your principal inspector or responsible Flight Standards Office,
as appropriate. If sending information directly to the manager of
the certification office, send it to the attention of the person
identified in Related Information. Information may be emailed to<EMAIL_ADDRESS>    (2) Before using any approved AMOC, notify your appropriate
principal inspector, or lacking a principal inspector, the manager
of the responsible Flight Standards Office.
    (3) An AMOC that provides an acceptable level of safety may be
used for any repair, modification, or alteration required by this AD
if it is approved by The Boeing Company Organization Designation
Authorization (ODA) that has been authorized by the Manager, Seattle
ACO Branch, FAA, to make those findings. To be approved, the repair
method, modification deviation, or alteration deviation must meet
the certification basis of the airplane, and the approval must
specifically refer to this AD.

(l) Related Information

    (1) For more information about this AD, contact Tak Kobayashi,
Aerospace Engineer, Propulsion Section, FAA, Seattle ACO Branch,
2200 South 216th St., Des Moines, WA 98198; phone and fax: 206-231-
3553; email<EMAIL_ADDRESS>    (2) For service information identified in this AD, contact
Boeing Commercial Airplanes, Attention: Contractual & Data Services
(C&DS), 2600 Westminster Blvd., MC 110-SK57, Seal Beach, CA 90740-
5600; telephone<PHONE_NUMBER>; internet https://www.myboeingfleet.com. You may view this referenced service
information at the FAA, Airworthiness Products Section, Operational
Safety Branch, 2200 South 216th St., Des Moines, WA. For information
on the availability of this material at the FAA, call<PHONE_NUMBER>.

    Issued on April 15, 2021.
Lance T. Gant,
Director, Compliance & Airworthiness Division, Aircraft Certification
Service.
[FR Doc. 2021-09761 Filed 5-7-21; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910-13-P


[Federal Register Volume 77, Number 233 (Tuesday, December 4, 2012)]
[Notices]
[Page 71791]
[FR Doc No: 2012-29197]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission

Combined Notice of Filings 1

    Take notice that the Commission received the following electric
rate filings:

    Docket Numbers: ER13-450-000.
    Applicants: Dominion Energy Manchester Street, Inc.
    Description: Dominion Energy Manchester Street, Inc. submits tariff
filing per 35.1: New Baseline Refile to be effective 11/27/2012.
    Filed Date: 11/26/12.
    Accession Number: 20121126-5031.
    Comments Due: 5 p.m. ET 12/17/12.

    Docket Numbers: ER13-451-000.
    Applicants: Florida Power Corporation.
    Description: Rate Schedule No. 197 of Florida Power Corporation to
be effective 12/28/2012.
    Filed Date: 11/26/12.
    Accession Number: 20121126-5085.
    Comments Due: 5 p.m. ET 12/17/12.

    Docket Numbers: ER13-452-000.
    Applicants: Florida Power Corporation.
    Description: Rate Schedule No. 220 of Florida Power Corporation to
be effective 1/1/2013.
    Filed Date: 11/26/12.
    Accession Number: 20121126-5086.
    Comments Due: 5 p.m. ET 12/17/12.

    Take notice that the Commission received the following electric
securities filings:

    Docket Numbers: ES13-9-000.
    Applicants: Montana Alberta Tie Ltd, MATL LLP.
    Description: Montana Alberta Tie Ltd, et al. submits Supplement to
Application.
    Filed Date: 11/21/12.
    Accession Number: 20121121-5222.
    Comments Due: 5 p.m. ET 12/5/12.

    The filings are accessible in the Commission's eLibrary system by
clicking on the links or querying the docket number.
    Any person desiring to intervene or protest in any of the above
proceedings must file in accordance with Rules 211 and 214 of the
Commission's Regulations (18 CFR 385.211 and 385.214) on or before 5:00
p.m. Eastern time on the specified comment date. Protests may be
considered, but intervention is necessary to become a party to the
proceeding.
    eFiling is encouraged. More detailed information relating to filing
requirements, interventions, protests, service, and qualifying
facilities filings can be found at: http://www.ferc.gov/docs-filing/efiling/filing-req.pdf. For other information, call<PHONE_NUMBER>
(toll free). For TTY, call<PHONE_NUMBER>.

    Dated: November 26, 2012.
Nathaniel J. Davis, Sr.,
Deputy Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2012-29197 Filed 12-3-12; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6717-01-P


[Federal Register Volume 81, Number 122 (Friday, June 24, 2016)]
[Notices]
[Pages 41354-41355]
[FR Doc No: 2016-14930]

=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

Submission for OMB Review; Comment Request

Upon Written Request Copies Available From: Securities and Exchange
Commission, Office of FOIA Services, 100 F Street NE., Washington, DC
20549-2736.

Extension:
    Form 18-K; SEC File No. 270-108, OMB Control No. 3235-0120.

    Notice is hereby given that, pursuant to the Paperwork Reduction
Act of 1995 (44 U.S.C. 3501 et seq.), the Securities and Exchange
Commission (``Commission'') has submitted to the Office of Management
and Budget this request for extension of the previously approved
collection of information discussed below.

    Form 18-K (17 CFR 249.318) is an annual report form used by foreign
governments or political subdivisions of foreign governments with
securities listed on a United States exchange. The information to be
collected is intended to ensure the adequacy and public availability of
information available to investors. The information provided is
mandatory. Form 18-K is a public document. We estimate that Form 18-K
takes approximately 8 hours to prepare and is filed by approximately 35
respondents for a total annual reporting burden of 280 hours (8 hours
per response x 35 responses).
    An agency may not conduct or sponsor, and a person is not required
to respond to, a collection of information unless it displays a
currently valid control number.
    The public may view the background documentation for this
information collection at the following Web site, www.reginfo.gov.
Comments should be directed to: (i) Desk Officer for the Securities and
Exchange Commission, Office of Information and Regulatory Affairs,
Office of Management and Budget, Room 10102, New Executive Office
Building, Washington, DC 20503, or by sending an email to:
<EMAIL_ADDRESS>and (ii) Pamela Dyson, Director/Chief
Information Officer, Securities and Exchange Commission, c/o Remi
Pavlik-Simon, 100 F Street NE., Washington, DC 20549 or send an email
to<EMAIL_ADDRESS>Comments must be submitted to OMB within 30
days of this notice.

    Dated: June 20, 2016.
Robert W. Errett,
Deputy Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2016-14930 Filed 6-23-16; 8:45 am]
 BILLING CODE 8011-01-P


[Federal Register Volume 86, Number 219 (Wednesday, November 17, 2021)]
[Notices]
[Pages 64276-64277]
[FR Doc No: 2021-25017]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

[Release No. 34-93553; File No. SR-NYSEArca-2021-67]

Self-Regulatory Organizations; NYSE Arca, Inc.; Notice of
Designation of a Longer Period for Commission Action on a Proposed Rule
Change To List and Trade Shares of the One River Carbon Neutral Bitcoin
Trust Under NYSE Arca Rule 8.201-E

November 10, 2021.
    On September 20, 2021, NYSE Arca, Inc. (``NYSE Arca'') filed with
the Securities and Exchange Commission (``Commission''), pursuant to
Section 19(b)(1) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (``Act'') \1\
and Rule 19b-4 thereunder,\2\ a proposed rule change to list and trade
shares of the One River Carbon Neutral Bitcoin Trust under NYSE Arca
Rule 8.201-E (Commodity-Based Trust Shares). The proposed rule

change was published for comment in the Federal Register on October 5,
2021.\3\ The Commission has received comments on the proposed rule
change.\4\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \1\ 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(1).
    \2\ 17 CFR 240.19b-4.
    \3\ See Securities Exchange Act Release No. 93171 (Sept. 29,
2021), 86 FR 55073.
    \4\ Comments received on the proposed rule change are available
at: https://www.sec.gov/comments/sr-nysearca-2021-67/srnysearca202167.htm.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    Section 19(b)(2) of the Act \5\ provides that within 45 days of the
publication of notice of the filing of a proposed rule change, or
within such longer period up to 90 days (i) as the Commission may
designate if it finds such longer period to be appropriate and
publishes its reasons for so finding or (ii) as to which the self-
regulatory organization consents, the Commission shall either approve
the proposed rule change, disapprove the proposed rule change, or
institute proceedings to determine whether the proposed rule change
should be disapproved. The 45th day after publication of the notice for
this proposed rule change is November 19, 2021. The Commission is
extending this 45-day time period.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \5\ 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(2).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    The Commission finds that it is appropriate to designate a longer
period within which to take action on the proposed rule change so that
it has sufficient time to consider the proposed rule change and the
comments received. Accordingly, pursuant to Section 19(b)(2) of the
Act,\6\ the Commission designates January 3, 2022, as the date by which
the Commission shall either approve or disapprove, or institute
proceedings to determine whether to disapprove, the proposed rule
change (File No. SR-NYSEArca-2021-67).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \6\ Id.

    For the Commission, by the Division of Trading and Markets,
pursuant to delegated authority.\7\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \7\ 17 CFR 200.30-3(a)(31).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

J. Matthew DeLesDernier,
Assistant Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2021-25017 Filed 11-16-21; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 8011-01-P