[Federal Register Volume 84, Number 115 (Friday, June 14, 2019)]
[Notices]
[Pages 27782-27783]
[FR Doc No: 2019-12565]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES

Food and Drug Administration

[Docket No. FDA-2019-N-2272]

Request for Nominations From Industry Organizations Interested in
Participating in the Selection Process for Nonvoting Industry
Representatives and Request for Nominations for Nonvoting Industry
Representatives on the Cellular, Tissue, and Gene Therapies Advisory
Committee

AGENCY: Food and Drug Administration, HHS.

ACTION: Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Food and Drug Administration (FDA) is requesting that any
industry organizations interested in participating in the selection of
a nonvoting industry representative to serve on the Cellular, Tissue,
and Gene Therapies Advisory Committee for the Center for Biologics
Evaluation and Research (CBER) notify FDA in writing. FDA is also
requesting nominations for a non-voting industry representative(s) to
serve on the Cellular, Tissue, and Gene Therapies Advisory Committee
Blood Products Advisory Committee. A nominee may either be self-
nominated or nominated by an organization to serve as a nonvoting
industry representative. Nominations will be accepted for current
vacancies effective with this notice.

DATES: Any industry organization interested in participating in the
selection of an appropriate non-voting member to represent industry
interests must send a letter stating that interest to FDA by July 15,
2019 (see sections I and II of this document for further details).
Concurrently, nomination materials for prospective candidates should be
sent to FDA by July 15, 2019.

ADDRESSES: All statements of interest from industry organizations
interested in participating in the selection process of nonvoting
industry representative(s) should be sent to Prabhakara Atreya and
Jeannette Devine (see FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT). All nominations
for nonvoting industry representatives may be submitted electronically
by accessing the FDA Advisory Committee Membership Nomination Portal
at: https://www.accessdata.fda.gov/scripts/FACTRSPortal/FACTRS/index.cfm.
    Information about becoming a member of an FDA advisory committee
can also be obtained by visiting FDA's website at https://www.fda.gov/AdvisoryCommittees/default.htm.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Prabhakara Atreya, Division of
Scientific Advisors and Consultants, Center for Biologics Evaluation
and Research, 10903 New Hampshire Ave., Bldg. 71, Rm. 6306, Silver
Spring, MD 20993-0002,<PHONE_NUMBER>, Fax:<PHONE_NUMBER>, email:
<EMAIL_ADDRESS>and Jeannette Devine, Division of
Scientific Advisors and Consultants, Center for Biologics Evaluation
and Research, 10903 New Hampshire Ave., Bldg. 71, Rm. 6334, Silver
Spring, MD 20993-0002,<PHONE_NUMBER>, Fax:<PHONE_NUMBER>,
<EMAIL_ADDRESS>
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The Agency intends to add a nonvoting
industry representative(s) to the following advisory committee:

I. CBER Cellular, Tissue, and Gene Therapies Advisory Committee

    The Cellular, Tissue, and Gene Therapies Advisory Committee (the
Committee) reviews and evaluates available data relating to the safety,
effectiveness, and appropriate use of human cells, human tissues, gene
transfer therapies and xenotransplantation products which are intended
for transplantation, implantation, infusion and transfer in the
prevention and treatment of a broad spectrum of human diseases and in
the reconstruction, repair or replacement of tissues for various
conditions. The Committee also considers the quality and relevance of
FDA's research program which provides scientific support for the
regulation of these products and makes appropriate recommendations to
the Commissioner of Food and Drugs.

II. Selection Procedure

    Any industry organization interested in participating in the
selection of an appropriate non-voting member to represent industry
interests should send a letter stating that interest to the FDA contact
(see FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT) within 30 days of publication of
this document (see DATES). Within the subsequent 30 days, FDA will send
a letter to each organization that has expressed an interest, attaching
a complete list of all such organizations; and a list of all nominees
along with their current resumes. The letter will also state that it is
the responsibility of the interested organizations to confer with one
another and to select a candidate, within 60 days after the receipt of
the FDA letter, to serve as the nonvoting member to represent industry
interests for the committee. The interested organizations are not bound
by the list of nominees in selecting a candidate. However, if no
individual is selected within 60 days, the Commissioner will select the
nonvoting member to represent industry interests.

III. Application Procedure

    Individuals may self-nominate, and/or an organization may nominate
one or more individuals to serve as a nonvoting industry
representative. Contact information, a current curriculum vitae, and
the name of the committee of interest should be sent to the FDA
Advisory Committee Membership Nomination Portal (see ADDRESSES) within
30 days of publication of this document (see DATES). FDA will forward
all nominations to the organizations expressing interest in
participating in the selection process for the committee. (Persons who
nominate themselves as non-voting industry representatives will not
participate in the selection process).
    FDA seeks to include the views of women, men, members of all racial
and ethnic groups, and individuals with and without disabilities on its
advisory committees and, therefore, encourages nominations of
appropriately qualified candidates from these groups.
    This notice is issued under the Federal Advisory Committee Act (5
U.S.C. app. 2) and 21 CFR part 14, relating to advisory committees.

    Dated: June 10, 2019.
Lowell J. Schiller,
Principal Associate Commissioner for Policy.
[FR Doc. 2019-12565 Filed 6-13-19; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4164-01-P


[Federal Register Volume 78, Number 19 (Tuesday, January 29, 2013)]
[Notices]
[Page 6167]
[FR Doc No: 2013-01964]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

[File No. 500-1]

In the Matter of Largo Vista Group, Ltd., Montavo, Inc., OBN
Holdings, Inc., PrepaYd, Inc., Ready Welder Corp., and Snowdon
Resources Corp.; Order of Suspension of Trading

January 25, 2013.
    It appears to the Securities and Exchange Commission that there is
a lack of current and accurate information concerning the securities of
Largo Vista Group, Ltd. because it has not filed any periodic reports
since the period ended September 30, 2008.
    It appears to the Securities and Exchange Commission that there is
a lack of current and accurate information concerning the securities of
Montavo, Inc. because it has not filed any periodic reports since the
period ended June 30, 2011.
    It appears to the Securities and Exchange Commission that there is
a lack of current and accurate information concerning the securities of
OBN Holdings, Inc. because it has not filed any periodic reports since
the period ended March 31, 2010.
    It appears to the Securities and Exchange Commission that there is
a lack of current and accurate information concerning the securities of
PrepaYd, Inc. because it has not filed any periodic reports since the
period ended December 31, 2010.
    It appears to the Securities and Exchange Commission that there is
a lack of current and accurate information concerning the securities of
Ready Welder Corp. because it has not filed any periodic reports since
the period ended September 30, 2010.
    It appears to the Securities and Exchange Commission that there is
a lack of current and accurate information concerning the securities of
Snowdon Resources Corp. because it has not filed any periodic reports
since the period ended January 31, 2011.
    The Commission is of the opinion that the public interest and the
protection of investors require a suspension of trading in the
securities of the above-listed companies.
    Therefore, it is ordered, pursuant to Section 12(k) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934, that trading in the securities of the
above-listed companies is suspended for the period from 9:30 a.m. EST
on January 25, 2013, through 11:59 p.m. EST on February 7, 2013.

    By the Commission.
Jill M. Peterson,
Assistant Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2013-01964 Filed 1-25-13; 11:15 am]
BILLING CODE 8011-01-P


[Federal Register: May 16, 2007 (Volume 72, Number 94)]
[Notices]
[Page 27553]
[DOCID:fr16my07-64]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission

[Docket No. RP07-442-000]

Wyoming Interstate Company, Ltd.; Notice of Proposed Changes in
FERC Gas Tariff

May 8, 2007.
    Take notice that on May 3, 2007, Wyoming Interstate Company, Ltd.
(WIC) tendered for filing as part of its FERC Gas Tariff, Second
Revised Volume No. 2, Eighth Revised Sheet No. 1, to become effective
June 4, 2007.
    WIC states that this tariff sheet is being filed to remove two
contracts from the listing of non-conforming agreements.
    Any person desiring to intervene or to protest this filing must
file in accordance with Rules 211 and 214 of the Commission's Rules of
Practice and Procedure (18 CFR 385.211 and 385.214). Protests will be
considered by the Commission in determining the appropriate action to
be taken, but will not serve to make protestants parties to the
proceeding. Any person wishing to become a party must file a notice of
intervention or motion to intervene, as appropriate. Such notices,
motions, or protests must be filed in accordance with the provisions of
Section 154.210 of the Commission's regulations (18 CFR 154.210).
Anyone filing an intervention or protest must serve a copy of that
document on the Applicant. Anyone filing an intervention or protest on
or before the intervention or protest date need not serve motions to
intervene or protests on persons other than the Applicant.
    The Commission encourages electronic submission of protests and
interventions in lieu of paper using the ``eFiling'' link at http://www.ferc.gov.
 Persons unable to file electronically should submit an

original and 14 copies of the protest or intervention to the Federal
Energy Regulatory Commission, 888 First Street, NE., Washington, DC
20426.
    This filing is accessible on-line at http://www.ferc.gov, using the

``eLibrary'' link and is available for review in the Commission's
Public Reference Room in Washington, DC. There is an ``eSubscription''
link on the Web site that enables subscribers to receive e-mail
notification when a document is added to a subscribed docket(s). For
assistance with any FERC Online service, please e-mail
<EMAIL_ADDRESS>or call<PHONE_NUMBER> (toll free). For

TTY, call<PHONE_NUMBER>.

Kimberly D. Bose,
Secretary.
 [FR Doc. E7-9320 Filed 5-15-07; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 6717-01-P


[Federal Register Volume 84, Number 109 (Thursday, June 6, 2019)]
[Notices]
[Page 26457]
[FR Doc No: 2019-11828]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

[Release No. 34-85982; File No. 013-00107]

Initial Form ATS-N Filing; Notice of Extension of Commission
Review Period

May 31, 2019.
    On February 8, 2019, Liquidnet Negotiation ATS filed an initial
Form ATS-N (``Form ATS-N'') with the Securities and Exchange Commission
(``Commission''). Pursuant to Rule 304 under the Securities and
Exchange Act of 1934 (``Act''), the Commission may, after notice and an
opportunity for hearing, declare an initial Form ATS-N ineffective no
later than 120 days from the date of filing with the Commission, or, if
applicable, the extended review period. June 8, 2019 is 120 calendar
days from the date of filing. Pursuant to Rule 304(a)(1)(iv)(B), the
Commission may extend the initial Form ATS-N review period for up to an
additional 120 calendar days if the initial Form ATS-N is unusually
lengthy or raises novel or complex issues that require additional time
for review.
    Liquidnet Negotiation ATS was operating pursuant to an initial
operation report on Form ATS on file with the Commission as of January
7, 2019.\1\ Liquidnet Negotiation ATS filed an initial Form ATS-N on
February 8, 2019. During the initial 120 calendar day review period,
the Commission staff has been reviewing the disclosures on Liquidnet
Negotiation ATS's initial Form ATS-N. In addition, the staff has been
engaged in ongoing discussions with Liquidnet Negotiation ATS about its
disclosures and manner of operations, as well as the requirements of
Form ATS-N, to facilitate complete and comprehensible disclosures that
reflect the complexities of those operations.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \1\ An NMS Stock ATS (as defined in Rule 300(k) of Regulation
ATS) that was operating pursuant to an initial operation report on
Form ATS on file with the Commission as of January 7, 2019 is a
``Legacy NMS Stock ATS.'' 17 CFR 242.301(b)(2)(viii).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    Form ATS-N requires NMS Stock ATSs to file with the Commission, and
disclose to the public for the first time, certain information,
including descriptions by the NMS Stock ATSs of their fees, the trading
activities by their broker-dealer operators and their affiliates in the
NMS Stock ATSs, their use of market data, their written standards for
granting access to trading on the NMS Stock ATSs, and their written
safeguards and procedures for protecting their subscribers'
confidential trading information required by revised Rule 301(b)(10) of
Regulation ATS. The initial Form ATS-N disclosures and discussions with
Commission staff have revealed complexities about the operations of
Legacy NMS Stock ATSs including, among other things, matching
functionalities, means of order entry, order interaction and execution
procedures, conditional order processes, segmentation of orders, and
counterparty selection protocols. The Commission staff needs additional
time to review novel and complex issues such as these, which Commission
staff has discussed with Liquidnet Negotiation ATS. Extending the
initial Form ATS-N Commission review period for an additional 120
calendar days will provide Commission staff an opportunity to continue
its review of the initial Form ATS-N disclosures and discussions with
Liquidnet Negotiation ATS.
    In the conversations between Liquidnet Negotiation ATS and
Commission staff about the initial Form ATS-N disclosures and the ATS
operations, Commission staff and Liquidnet Negotiation ATS have
discussed a potential amendment to update Liquidnet Negotiation ATS's
disclosures regarding the complexities of its operations. Extending the
review period will enable the NMS Stock ATS to amend its disclosures,
if appropriate, and allow Commission staff to conduct a thorough review
of amendments to the initial disclosures provided on the initial Form
ATS-N.
    For the reasons given above, the Commission is extending the review
period of the initial Form ATS-N submitted by Liquidnet Negotiation
ATS. Accordingly, pursuant to Rule 304(a)(1)(iv)(B), October 6, 2019 is
the date by which the Commission may declare the initial Form ATS-N
submitted by Liquidnet Negotiation ATS ineffective.

    By the Commission.

Eduardo A. Aleman,
Deputy Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2019-11828 Filed 6-5-19; 8:45 am]
 BILLING CODE 8011-01-P


[Federal Register Volume 78, Number 229 (Wednesday, November 27, 2013)]
[Notices]
[Page 70956]
[FR Doc No: 2013-28473]

=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY

Federal Emergency Management Agency

[Internal Agency Docket No. FEMA-4148-DR; Docket ID FEMA-2013-0001]

New Mexico; Amendment No. 1 to Notice of a Major Disaster
Declaration

AGENCY: Federal Emergency Management Agency, DHS.

ACTION: Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: This notice amends the notice of a major disaster declaration
for the State of New Mexico (FEMA-4148-DR), dated September 30, 2013,
and related determinations.

DATES: Effective Date: November 20, 2013.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Dean Webster, Office of Response and
Recovery, Federal Emergency Management Agency, 500 C Street SW.,
Washington, DC 20472,<PHONE_NUMBER>.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The notice of a major disaster declaration
for the State of New Mexico is hereby amended to include the following
areas among those areas determined to have been adversely affected by
the event declared a major disaster by the President in his declaration
of September 30, 2013.

    Sierra County and the Navajo Nation for Public Assistance.

    The following Catalog of Federal Domestic Assistance Numbers
(CFDA) are to be used for reporting and drawing funds: 97.030,
Community Disaster Loans; 97.031, Cora Brown Fund; 97.032, Crisis
Counseling; 97.033, Disaster Legal Services; 97.034, Disaster
Unemployment Assistance (DUA); 97.046, Fire Management Assistance
Grant; 97.048, Disaster Housing Assistance to Individuals and
Households In Presidentially Declared Disaster Areas; 97.049,
Presidentially Declared Disaster Assistance--Disaster Housing
Operations for Individuals and Households; 97.050 Presidentially
Declared Disaster Assistance to Individuals and Households--Other
Needs; 97.036, Disaster Grants--Public Assistance (Presidentially
Declared Disasters); 97.039, Hazard Mitigation Grant.

W. Craig Fugate,
Administrator, Federal Emergency Management Agency.
[FR Doc. 2013-28473 Filed 11-26-13; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 9111-23-P


FILE NAME: company. wpt ( 2/ 1/ 2003)

ATTENTION:

All commodity terms must comply with the Food and Feed Commodity Vocabulary database ( http:// www. epa. gov/ pesticides/ foodfeed/).

All instructional text and prompts in green font should be removed prior to sending the document to the Federal Register Staff.

COMPANY FEDERAL REGISTER DOCUMENT SUBMISSION TEMPLATE ( 2/ 1/ 2003)

EPA Registration Division contact: [ Hoyt Jamerson, ( 703) 308 9368]

INSTRUCTIONS: Please utilize this outline in preparing tolerance petition documents. In cases where the outline element does not apply please insert " NA Remove" and maintain the outline. The comment notes that appear on the left margin represent hidden typesetting codes designed to expedite the processing of the Federal Register document. Please do not remove or alter these comment notes or change the margins, font, or format in your document. Simply replace the instructions that appear in italics and brackets, i. e., "[ insert company name]," with the information specific to your action.

TEMPLATE:

[ Crompton Corporation]

[ 3E6535]

EPA has received a pesticide petition ([ 3E6535]) from [ Crompton Corp.], [ 74 Amity, Bethany, CT 06525] proposing, pursuant to section 408( d) of the Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act ( FFDCA), 21 U. S. C. 346a( d), to amend 40 CFR part 180.

Options ( pick one)

1. by establishing a tolerance for residues of triflumizole,

[[ 1[ 1(( 4 chloro 2( trifluoromethyl) phenyl) imino) 2 propoxyethyl] 1H imidazole]] in or on the raw agricultural commodity [ filberts] at [ 0.05] parts per million ( ppm). EPA has determined that the petition contains data or information regarding the elements set forth in section 408( d)( 2) of the 2 FFDCA; however, EPA has not fully evaluated the sufficiency of the submitted data at this time or whether the data supports granting of the petition. Additional data may be needed before EPA rules on the petition.

A. Residue Chemistry 1. Plant metabolism. [ In crops, the metabolism of [ 14C] Phenyl] triflumizole was investigated in cucumber, pears, grapes and apples. The major metabolites were: N( 4 chloro 2 trifluoromethylphenyl) n propoxyacetamidine ( FM 6 1), N( 4 chloro 2 trifluoromethyphenyl) npropoxyacetanilide ( FD 1 1) and the free or conjugated products of N( 4 chloro 2 trifluoromethylphenyl) hydroxyacetamidine ( the O dealkylation product of FM 6 1), N( 4 chloro 2 trifluoromethylphenyl) hydroxyacetanilide ( FD 2 1) and the triflumizole aniline ( FA 1 1)..]

2. Analytical method. [ The analytical method is suitable for analyzing crops for residues of triflumizole and its aniline containing metabolites at the proposed tolerance levels. The analytical method has been independently validated. Residue levels of triflumizole are converted to FA 1 1 by acidic and alkaline reflux, followed by distillation. Residues are then extracted and subjected to SPE purification. Detection and quantitation are conducted by a gas chromatography equipped with nitrogen phosphorus detector, electron capture detector or mass spectrometry detection. The limit of quantitation of the method has been determined at 0.05 ppm for the combined residues of triflumizole and FA 1 1 in filberts. The enforcement methodology has been submitted to the Food & Drug Administration for publication in the Pesticide Analytical Manual, Vol. II ( PAM II).]

3. Magnitude of residues. [ Field trials were conducted at 3 locations in commercial growing areas of the United States, to evaluate the quantity of triflumizole residues in filberts. Treated and control samples of filbert nuts were collected at 21 days prior to harvest. The residue in all treated samples was < 0.05 ppb.]

B. Toxicological Profile 1. Acute toxicity. [ The data base includes the following studies: a rat acute oral study with a LD50 of 1.42 g/ kg; a rabbit acute dermal study with a LD50 > 5 g/ kg; a rat acute inhalation study with a LC50 > 3.2 mg/ l; a rabbit primary ocular irritation study which showed mild irritation; a rabbit primary dermal irritation study which showed no irritation; a guinea pig dermal sensitization study which showed slight dermal sensitization potential. ] 3 2. Genotoxicity. [ Triflumizole was negative in all genotoxicity assays including: Ames assay in S. typhimurium, gene conversion assay in yeast strain D4, REC assay in B. subtilis, unscheduled DNA synthesis ( UDS) assay in cultured rat hepatocytes, chromosome aberration assay in cultured Chinese hampster ovary ( CHO); cells and a mouse micronucleus assay. ]

3. Reproductive and developmental toxicity. [ In a developmental toxicity study, triflumizole was administered by oral gavage to pregnant, female Sprague Dawley rats at dosage levels of 0, 10, 35 or 120 mg/ kg/ day. Maternal toxicity, as evidenced by a substantial reduction in body weight gain, was seen at 35 and 120 mg/ kg/ day. At these dosage levels there was a decrease in fetal viability in the form of late resorptions. There were no teratogenic effects. The no observed adverse effect level ( NOAEL) for maternal and developmental toxicity was 10 mg/ kg/ day. Triflumizole was also administered by oral gavage to pregnant, female New Zealand White rabbits at dosage levels of 0, 5, 25, or 50 mg/ kg/ day. At a dose level of 50 mg/ kg/ day there was a reduction in body weight gain in kits. There were no developmental or teratogenic effects. The NOAEL for maternal toxicity was 25 mg/ kg/ day and the NOAEL for developmental toxicity was greater than 50 mg/ kg/ day. The reproductive toxicity of triflumizole was evaluated in a rat reproduction study, conducted on three generations, at dietary concentrations of 0, 30 70 and 170 ppm. Fertility was not affected by treatment. There was an increase in placental weight in the F1b, F2b, and F3b litters and an increase in gestation length at 170 ppm at the F1a and F3a mating intervals and at 70 ppm at the F3a mating interval. The NOAEL for systemic parental toxicity was 170 ppm ( 8.5 mg/ kg/ day). The NOAEL for offspring was 70 ppm ( 3.5 mg/ kg/ day) based upon effects seen in high dose litters, which included increased incidences of hydroureter and space between the body wall and organs. The NOAEL for reproductive effects was 30 ppm ( 1.5 mg/ kg/ day) based upon the observed increase in gestation length.]

4. Subchronic toxicity. [ To assess sub acute dermal toxicity, triflumizole was applied to the backs of male and female Sprague Dawley rats for three weeks. High dose female rats exposed to 1,000 mg/ kg/ day exhibited mild fatty vacuolation in the liver, which was within the range of normal biological variation. Therefore, the NOAEL for sub acute dermal toxicity in rats was greater than 1,000 mg/ kg/ day.]

5. Chronic toxicity. [ Triflumizole was fed to male and female Beagle dogs for one year at dietary concentrations of 0, 100, 300 and 1,000 ppm to assess chronic toxicity. At a dosage level of 1,000 ppm there was an increase in serum liver enzymes and a decrease in RBC concentration. The NOAEL for chronic toxicity in dogs was 300 ppm ( 7.5 mg/ kg/ day).

Triflumizole was fed to male and female Sprague Dawley rats for two years at dietary concentrations of 0, 100, 400 and 1,600 ppm to assess chronic toxicity. At the high dose level there was a substantial reduction in body weight gain in males and females. At the mid and high dose levels there was an increase in liver weight. Ovary weight was increased in high dose female rats, and kidney weights were elevated in high dose animals. Alanine amino transferase and lactose dehydrogenase 4 were elevated in high dose males and females, respectively. High dose females had an increased incidence of ovarian follicular cysts, while high dose males exhibited pancreatic acinar cell atrophy. Fatty vacuolization of the liver was seen at all dose levels and hepatocytic hypertrophy was seen in high and mid dose males and females. Female rats given 400 or 1,600 ppm had an increased incidence of basophilic foci/ areas of hepatocytic alteration. Effects at 100 ppm were confined to hepatocytic fatty vacuolation and hypertrophy in females. These changes were less severe than those seen in rats given 400 or 1,600 ppm and were considered by the laboratory to be indicative of adaptive metabolic change. The dietary level of 100 ppm ( 5 mg/ kg/ day) is considered to be a NOAEL.]

6. Animal metabolism . [ Triflumizole, [ 14 C Phenyl] 1( 1(( 4 chloro 2 trifluoromethylphenyl) imino) 2 propoxyethyl) 1H imidazole, was found to be rapidly absorbed and excreted in rats. Two days after oral dosing, 78% was found to be excreted in the urine and 20% in the feces. No sex difference was noted. It appears that the loss of the imidazole ring was the basic step in the metabolic pathway of this fungicide in mammals. The elimination of the imidazole ring yielded initially N( 4 chloro 2 trifluoromethylphenyl) n propoxyacetamidine ( FM 6 1), and N( 4 chloro 2 trifluoromethylphenyl) n propoxyacetanilide ( FD 1 1). Other hydroxylated metabolites identified ( free, or as sulfate/ glucuronide conjugates) included, among others, N( 4 chloro 2 trifluoromethylphenyl) hydroxyacetamidine ( FM 8 1); 4 chloro 2 trifluoromethylhydroxyacetanilide ( FD 2 1); and 4 chloro 2 trifluoromethyl 6 hydroxyaniline ( FA 1 5).]

7. Metabolite toxicology . [ Both plant and animals produce the same metabolites that were identified in the metabolism studies; therefore, the toxicity of the metabolites has essentially been evaluated in the rat toxicology studies.]

8. Endocrine disruption. [ In the rat reproduction study there was an increase in placental weight in females at the high dose level of 170 ppm. There was also a biologically significant increase in gestation length in high dose F0 and F2 females ( F1a and F3a intervals). The NOEL for endocrine effects is 70 ppm ( 3.5 mg/ kg/ day).]

C. Aggregate Exposure 1. Dietary exposure.

i. Food. [ Tolerances have been established for the combined residues of triflumizole and its metabolites containing the 4 chloro 2 trifluoromethylaniline moiety, calculated as the parent compound, in or on apples, pears, grapes, cucurbit vegetables, strawberries, sweet cherries, and tart cherries. Tolerances have also been established for the combined residues of triflumizole and the metabolite 4 chloro 2 hydroxy 6 trifluoromethylaniline sulfate and other metabolites containing the 4 chloro 2 trifluoromethylaniline moiety, calculated as the parent compound, in or on eggs, milk, meat, fat, and meat by products of cattle, goats, hogs, horses, poultry and sheep. 5 The Dietary Exposure Evaluation Model ( DEEMTM) was used to estimate acute and chronic dietary exposure. For acute exposure estimates, tolerance level residues, modified DEEM processing factors for apples and grapes, and an assumption of 100% crop treatment was used for all registered uses and including the filbert use. Chronic exposure estimates utilized anticipated residues for the apple, grape, pear, cherry, cucurbit vegetable, strawberry, and milk commodities, modified DEEM processing factors for apples and grapes, and average weighted percent crop treated information for apple, grape, and pear commodities. Tolerance level residues, DEEM default processing factors, and 100% crop treated were used for all other commodities.]

ii. Drinking water. [ Drinking water. Tier I screen models FIRST ( First Index Reservoir Screening Tool) and SCI GRO ( Screening Concentrations in Ground Water) were used to predict estimates of triflumizole concentrations in surface and groundwater, respectively. The predicted acute estimated environmental concentrations ( EEC) were 191 ppb for surface water, and 0.12 ppb for ground water. The predicted chronic EECs were 40 ppb for surface water, and 0.12 ppb for ground water.]

2. Non dietary exposure . [ There are no registered or proposed uses for application by homeowners. For the proposed residential uses, only professional handlers would apply triflumizole to woody ornamentals ( trees, shrubs, vines). Triflumizole is not used or proposed for use on lawns or turf. Therefore, residential exposure is not likely.]

D. Cumulative Effects [ The potential for cumulative effects of triflumizole, an imidazole, and other substances that have a common mechanism of toxicity was considered. The mammalian toxicity of triflumizole is well defined. No reliable information exists to indicate that toxic effects produced by triflumizole would be cumulative with those of any other chemical compounds. Therefore, consideration of a common mechanism of toxicity with other compounds is not appropriate. Thus only the potential risks of triflumizole are considered in the aggregate exposure assessment.]

E. Safety Determination [ 1. U. S. population i. Short Term Risk. The acute Population Adjusted Dose ( aPAD) of 0.03 mg/ kg bw/ day, applicable only to the population subgroup females 13 50 years, was based on the NOAEL of 10 mg/ kg/ day from the rat developmental study, a 300x uncertainty factor, and a 1x FQPA safety factor. Acute dietary exposure to females 13 50 years was 0.006385 mg/ kg bw/ day, and was 19% of the aPAD. The acute drinking water level of concern ( DWLOC) was calculated to be 710 ppb, and the model predicted acute EECs of 191 ppb for surface water and 0.12 ppb for groundwater are less than this DWLOC. Therefore, acute aggregate exposure from triflumizole is not expected to exceed the aPAD. 6 ii. Chronic Risk. The chronic Population Adjusted Dose ( cPAD) of 0.005 mg/ kg bw/ day was based on the NOAEL of 1.5 mg/ kg/ day from the rat reproduction study, a 300x uncertainty factor, and a 1x FQPA safety factor. The chronic dietary exposure to the general U. S. population was 0.000400 mg/ kg bw/ day and was 8% of the cPAD. The chronic DWLOC was calculated to be 160 ppb, and the model predicted chronic EECs of 40 ppb for surface water and 0.12 ppb for groundwater are less than this DWLOC. Therefore, chronic aggregate exposure from triflumizole is not expected to exceed the cPAD.]

2. Infants and children. [ i. Short Term Risk. No acute dietary endpoint of concern was determined to be applicable for infants and children.

ii. Chronic Risk. The chronic dietary exposure to infants was 0.000547 mg/ kg bw/ day, and was 11% of the cPAD. Chronic dietary exposure to children 1 6 years old, the most highly exposed population subgroup, was 0.000892 mg/ kg bw/ day, and was 18% of the cPAD. The chronic DWLOC was calculated to be 45 ppb for infants and 41 ppb for children and the model predicted chronic EECs of 40 ppb for surface water and 0.12 ppb for groundwater are less than the DWLOCs. Therefore, chronic aggregate exposure from triflumizole is not expected to exceed the cPAD.]

F. International Tolerances [ There are no Codex, Canadian or Mexican maximum residue limits established for triflumizole on filberts.]


[Federal Register Volume 79, Number 156 (Wednesday, August 13, 2014)]
[Proposed Rules]
[Pages 47387-47390]
[FR Doc No: 2014-19155]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION

Federal Aviation Administration

14 CFR Part 39

[Docket No. FAA-2014-0525; Directorate Identifier 2013-NM-235-AD]
RIN 2120-AA64

Airworthiness Directives; Airbus Airplanes

AGENCY: Federal Aviation Administration (FAA), DOT.

ACTION: Notice of proposed rulemaking (NPRM).

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: We propose to adopt a new airworthiness directive (AD) for
certain Airbus Model A330-300 and A340-200 and -300 series airplanes.
This proposed AD was prompted by a report of substantial inner skin
disbonding damage found on a rudder. This proposed AD would require
performing an inspection for damage of certain rudders, and repair if
necessary. We are proposing this AD to detect and correct damage of the
rudder, which could result in reduced structural integrity of the
rudder.

DATES: We must receive comments on this proposed AD by September 29,
2014.

ADDRESSES: You may send comments, using the procedures found in 14 CFR
11.43 and 11.45, by any of the following methods:
     Federal eRulemaking Portal: Go to http://www.regulations.gov. Follow the instructions for submitting comments.
     Fax:<PHONE_NUMBER>.
     Mail: U.S. Department of Transportation, Docket
Operations, M-30, West Building Ground Floor, Room W12-140, 1200 New
Jersey Avenue SE., Washington, DC 20590.
     Hand Delivery: U.S. Department of Transportation, Docket
Operations, M-30, West Building Ground Floor, Room W12-140, 1200 New
Jersey Avenue SE., Washington, DC, between 9 a.m. and 5 p.m., Monday
through Friday, except Federal holidays.
    For service information identified in this proposed AD, contact
Airbus SAS, Airworthiness Office--EAL, 1 Rond Point Maurice Bellonte,
31707 Blagnac Cedex, France; telephone +33 5 61 93 36 96; fax +33 5 61
93 45 80; email<EMAIL_ADDRESS>Internet http://www.airbus.com. You may view this referenced service information at the
FAA, Transport Airplane Directorate, 1601 Lind Avenue SW., Renton, WA.
For information on the availability of this material at the FAA, call
425-227-1221.

Examining the AD Docket

    You may examine the AD docket on the Internet at http://www.regulations.gov by searching for and locating Docket No. FAA-2014-
0525; or in person at the Docket Management Facility between 9 a.m. and
5 p.m., Monday through Friday, except Federal holidays. The AD docket
contains this proposed AD, the regulatory evaluation, any comments
received, and other information. The street address for the Docket
Operations office (telephone<PHONE_NUMBER>) is in the ADDRESSES section.
Comments will be available in the AD docket shortly after receipt.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Vladimir Ulyanov, Aerospace Engineer,
International Branch, ANM-116, Transport Airplane Directorate, FAA,
1601 Lind Avenue SW., Renton, WA 98057-3356; telephone<PHONE_NUMBER>;
fax<PHONE_NUMBER>.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

Comments Invited

    We invite you to send any written relevant data, views, or
arguments about this proposed AD. Send your comments to an address
listed under the ADDRESSES section. Include ``Docket No. FAA-2014-0525;
Directorate Identifier 2013-NM-235-AD'' at the beginning of your
comments. We specifically invite comments on the overall regulatory,
economic, environmental, and energy aspects of this proposed AD. We
will consider all comments received by the closing date and may amend
this proposed AD based on those comments.
    We will post all comments we receive, without change, to http://www.regulations.gov, including any personal information you provide. We
will also post a report summarizing each substantive verbal contact we
receive about this proposed AD.

Discussion

    The European Aviation Safety Agency (EASA), which is the Technical
Agent for the Member States of the European Community, has issued EASA
Airworthiness Directive 2013-0270R1, dated November 27, 2013 (referred
to after this as the Mandatory Continuing Airworthiness Information, or
``the MCAI''), to correct an unsafe condition for certain Airbus Model
A330-300 and A340-200 and -300 series airplanes. The MCAI states:

    One A310 operator found substantial inner skin disbonding damage
on a rudder. The results of the subsequent investigation revealed
that the most probable cause of this damage was a blunt impact with
no visible damage from outside during the rudder handling. Such type
of damage might grow with pressure variation during ground-air-
ground cycles, and tests performed with other rudders showed a rapid
propagation of damage during artificial pressure cycling.
    This condition, if not detected and corrected, could affect the
structural integrity of the rudder.
    For the affected A310 and A300-600 aeroplanes, EASA issued AD
2013-0039 [(http://ad.easa.europa.eu/blob/easa_ad_2013_0039.pdf/AD_2013-0039)], to address and correct this potential unsafe
condition.
    As potentially affected rudders can also be installed on A330
and A340 aeroplanes, Airbus issued Alert Operator Transmission (AOT)
A55L001-12 [dated December 20, 2012], pending Aircraft Maintenance
Manual (AMM) 27-21-41 PB401 revision, to provide operators with
updated rudder handling procedures.
    EASA issued AD 2013-0270 [(http://ad.easa.europa.eu/blob/easa_ad_2013_0270.pdf/AD_2013-0270)], to require identification of
affected rudders P/N [part number] A55471500XXX (where XXX stands
for any numerical value), a one-time ultrasonic test (UT) inspection
of each affected rudder to detect signs of disbonding and, depending
on findings, accomplishment of applicable corrective action(s).
    After [EASA] AD 2013-0270 was issued, operators commented that
the batch of rudders to be inspected was not correctly defined.
    For the reason described above, [EASA] AD 2013-0270 is revised
to clarify that no action is required for rudders previously
inspected in accordance with Airbus Service Bulletin (ASB) A330-55-
3038 [dated November 7, 2007] or SB A340-55-4034 [dated November 7,
2007] [which corresponds to FAA AD 2009-10-11, Amendment 39-15907
(74 FR 23622, May 20, 2009)], as applicable to aeroplane model,
provided the rudder has never been removed and/or installed on an
aeroplane since this inspection.

    Required actions include an elasticity of laminate checker
inspection of the rudder side panel to detect external and internal
disbonding, and a woodpecker or tap test inspection to detect external
disbonding, and repair if necessary. You may examine the MCAI in the AD
docket on the Internet at http://www.regulations.gov by searching for
and locating Docket No. FAA-2014-0525.

Relevant Service Information

    Airbus has issued Alert Operators Transmission A55L001-12, dated
December 20, 2012. The actions described in this service information
are intended to correct the unsafe condition identified in the MCAI.

FAA's Determination and Requirements of This Proposed AD

    This product has been approved by the aviation authority of another
country, and is approved for operation in the United States. Pursuant
to our bilateral agreement with the State of Design Authority, we have
been notified of the unsafe condition described in the MCAI and service
information referenced above. We are proposing this AD because we
evaluated all pertinent information and determined an unsafe condition
exists and is likely to exist or develop on other products of the same
type design.

``Contacting the Manufacturer'' Paragraph in This Proposed AD

    Since late 2006, we have included a standard paragraph titled
``Airworthy Product'' in all MCAI ADs in which the FAA develops an AD
based on a foreign authority's AD.
    The MCAI or referenced service information in an FAA AD often
directs the owner/operator to contact the manufacturer for corrective
actions, such as a repair. Briefly, the Airworthy Product paragraph
allowed owners/operators to use corrective actions provided by the
manufacturer if those actions were FAA-approved. In addition, the
paragraph stated that any actions approved by the State of Design
Authority (or its delegated agent) are considered to be FAA-approved.
    In an NPRM having Directorate Identifier 2012-NM-101-AD (78 FR
78285, December 26, 2013), we proposed to prevent the use of repairs
that were not specifically developed to correct the unsafe condition,
by requiring that the repair approval provided by the State of Design
Authority or its delegated agent specifically refer to the FAA AD. This
change was intended to clarify the method of compliance and to provide
operators with better visibility of repairs that are specifically
developed and approved to correct the unsafe condition. In addition, we
proposed to change the phrase ``its delegated agent'' to include a
design approval holder (DAH) with State of Design Authority design
organization approval (DOA), as applicable, to refer to a DAH
authorized to approve required repairs for the proposed AD.
    One commenter to the NPRM having Directorate Identifier 2012-NM-
101-AD (78 FR 78285, December 26, 2013) stated the following: ``The
proposed wording, being specific to repairs, eliminates the
interpretation that Airbus messages are acceptable for approving minor
deviations (corrective actions) needed during accomplishment of an AD
mandated Airbus service bulletin.''
    This comment has made the FAA aware that some operators have
misunderstood or misinterpreted the Airworthy Product paragraph to
allow the owner/operator to use messages

provided by the manufacturer as approval of deviations during the
accomplishment of an AD-mandated action. The Airworthy Product
paragraph does not approve messages or other information provided by
the manufacturer for deviations to the requirements of the AD-mandated
actions. The Airworthy Product paragraph only addresses the requirement
to contact the manufacturer for corrective actions for the identified
unsafe condition and does not cover deviations from other AD
requirements. However, deviations to AD-required actions are addressed
in 14 CFR 39.17, and anyone may request the approval for an alternative
method of compliance to the AD-required actions using the procedures
found in 14 CFR 39.19.
    To address this misunderstanding and misinterpretation of the
Airworthy Product paragraph, we have changed the paragraph and retitled
it ``Contacting the Manufacturer.'' This paragraph now clarifies that
for any requirement in this proposed AD to obtain corrective actions
from a manufacturer, the action must be accomplished using a method
approved by the FAA, the European Aviation Safety Agency (EASA), or
Airbus's EASA DOA.
    The Contacting the Manufacturer paragraph also clarifies that, if
approved by the DOA, the approval must include the DOA-authorized
signature. The DOA signature indicates that the data and information
contained in the document are EASA-approved, which is also FAA-
approved. Messages and other information provided by the manufacturer
that do not contain the DOA-authorized signature approval are not EASA-
approved, unless EASA directly approves the manufacturer's message or
other information.
    This clarification does not remove flexibility previously afforded
by the Airworthy Product paragraph. Consistent with long-standing FAA
policy, such flexibility was never intended for required actions. This
is also consistent with the recommendation of the Airworthiness
Directive Implementation Aviation Rulemaking Committee to increase
flexibility in complying with ADs by identifying those actions in
manufacturers' service instructions that are ``Required for
Compliance'' with ADs. We continue to work with manufacturers to
implement this recommendation. But once we determine that an action is
required, any deviation from the requirement must be approved as an
alternative method of compliance.

Costs of Compliance

    We estimate that this proposed AD affects 74 airplanes of U.S.
registry.
    We also estimate that it would take about 12 work-hours per product
to comply with the basic requirements of this proposed AD. The average
labor rate is $85 per work-hour. Required parts would cost about $0 per
product. Based on these figures, we estimate the cost of this proposed
AD on U.S. operators to be $75,480, or $1,020 per product.
    We have received no definitive data that would enable us to provide
a cost estimate for the on-condition actions specified in this proposed
AD.

Authority for This Rulemaking

    Title 49 of the United States Code specifies the FAA's authority to
issue rules on aviation safety. Subtitle I, section 106, describes the
authority of the FAA Administrator. ``Subtitle VII: Aviation
Programs,'' describes in more detail the scope of the Agency's
authority.
    We are issuing this rulemaking under the authority described in
``Subtitle VII, Part A, Subpart III, Section 44701: General
requirements.'' Under that section, Congress charges the FAA with
promoting safe flight of civil aircraft in air commerce by prescribing
regulations for practices, methods, and procedures the Administrator
finds necessary for safety in air commerce. This regulation is within
the scope of that authority because it addresses an unsafe condition
that is likely to exist or develop on products identified in this
rulemaking action.

Regulatory Findings

    We determined that this proposed AD would not have federalism
implications under Executive Order 13132. This proposed AD would not
have a substantial direct effect on the States, on the relationship
between the national Government and the States, or on the distribution
of power and responsibilities among the various levels of government.
    For the reasons discussed above, I certify this proposed
regulation:
    1. Is not a ``significant regulatory action'' under Executive Order
12866;
    2. Is not a ``significant rule'' under the DOT Regulatory Policies
and Procedures (44 FR 11034, February 26, 1979);
    3. Will not affect intrastate aviation in Alaska; and
    4. Will not have a significant economic impact, positive or
negative, on a substantial number of small entities under the criteria
of the Regulatory Flexibility Act.

List of Subjects in 14 CFR Part 39

    Air transportation, Aircraft, Aviation safety, Incorporation by
reference, Safety.

The Proposed Amendment

    Accordingly, under the authority delegated to me by the
Administrator, the FAA proposes to amend 14 CFR part 39 as follows:

PART 39--AIRWORTHINESS DIRECTIVES

0
1. The authority citation for part 39 continues to read as follows:

    Authority:  49 U.S.C. 106(g), 40113, 44701.

Sec.  39.13  [Amended]

0
2. The FAA amends Sec.  39.13 by adding the following new airworthiness
directive (AD):

Airbus: Docket No. FAA-2014-0525; Directorate Identifier 2013-NM-
235-AD.

(a) Comments Due Date

    We must receive comments by September 29, 2014.

(b) Affected ADs

    None.

(c) Applicability

    This AD applies to Airbus Model A330-301, -302, -303, -321, -
322, -323, -341, -342, and -343 airplanes; and Model A340-211, -212,
-213, -311, -312, and -313 airplanes; certificated in any category;
except airplanes on which Airbus Modification 41800 has been
embodied in production.

(d) Subject

    Air Transport Association (ATA) of America Code 55, Stabilizers.

(e) Reason

    This AD was prompted by a report of substantial inner skin
disbonding damage on a rudder. We are issuing this AD to detect and
correct damage of the rudder, which could result in reduced
structural integrity of the rudder.

(f) Compliance

    Comply with this AD within the compliance times specified,
unless already done.

(g) Rudder Assembly Identification

    Within 3 months after the effective date of this AD, inspect for
the rudder assembly part number and serial number, in accordance
with Airbus Alert Operators Transmission (AOT) A55L001-12, dated
December 20, 2012. If the part number or serial number cannot be
identified, before further flight, identify the part number and
serial number using a method approved by the Manager, International
Branch, ANM-116, Transport Airplane Directorate, FAA; or the
European Aviation Safety Agency (EASA); or Airbus's EASA Design
Organization Approval (DOA). If approved by the DOA, the approval
must include the DOA-authorized signature.

(h) Inspection

    If a rudder assembly having any part number starting with
A55471500 or A55471500XXX (where XXX stands for any numerical value)
is found during the inspection required by paragraph (g) of this AD,
and has been inspected before the effective date of this AD, as
specified in Airbus Service Bulletin A300-55-3038, dated November 7,
2007; or Airbus Service Bulletin A310-55-4034, dated November 7,
2007; as applicable; and has been removed and installed on any
airplane after the inspection, or that rudder has been inspected
off-wing: Before further flight, do an ultrasonic test inspection
for damage (e.g., disbonding and liquid ingress) of the rudder side
panel along the Z-profile and in the booster area, in accordance
with Airbus AOT A55L001-12, dated December 20, 2012. If any damage
is found, before further flight, do the inspections specified in
paragraphs (h)(1) and (h)(2) of this AD to confirm disbonding
damage, in accordance with AOT A55L001-12, dated December 20, 2012.
    (1) Do an elasticity of laminate checker inspection to detect
external and internal disbonding.
    (2) Do a woodpecker or tap test inspection to detect external
disbonding.

(i) Repair

    If any disbonding or damage (e.g. liquid ingress) is confirmed
during any inspection required by paragraphs (h), (h)(1), and (h)(2)
of this AD, repair at the time specified in paragraph (i)(1),
(i)(2), or (i)(3) of this AD, as applicable.
    (1) If the disbonding is less than or equal to 50 millimeters
(mm) in width and less than or equal to 150 mm in length: Before
further flight, vent the rudder core using a method approved by the
Manager, International Branch, ANM-116, Transport Airplane
Directorate, FAA; or EASA; or Airbus's EASA DOA. Within 100 flight
cycles after venting the rudder core, do a permanent repair using a
method approved by the Manager, International Branch, ANM-116,
Transport Airplane Directorate, FAA; or EASA; or Airbus's EASA DOA.
If approved by the DOA, the approval for the venting and repair
methods must include the DOA-authorized signature.
    (2) If the disbonding is greater than 50mm in width, or greater
than 150 mm in length: Before further flight, repair using a method
approved by the Manager, International Branch, ANM-116, Transport
Airplane Directorate, FAA; or EASA; or Airbus's EASA DOA. If
approved by the DOA, the approval must include the DOA-authorized
signature.
    (3) If any damage other than disbonding (e.g., liquid ingress)
is confirmed during any inspection required by paragraph (h) of this
AD, before further flight, repair, using a method approved by the
Manager, International Branch, ANM-116, Transport Airplane
Directorate, FAA; or EASA; or Airbus's EASA DOA. If approved by the
DOA, the approval must include the DOA-authorized signature.

(j) Parts Installation Limitation

    As of the effective date of this AD, you may install, on any
airplane, a rudder assembly having part number A55471500XXX (where
XXX stands for any numerical value), provided the inspection
required by paragraph (h) of this AD and all applicable repair
actions required by paragraph (i) of this AD are done before further
flight.

(k) Other FAA AD Provisions

    The following provisions also apply to this AD:
    (1) Alternative Methods of Compliance (AMOCs): The Manager,
International Branch, ANM-116, Tranport Airplane Directorate, FAA,
has the authority to approve AMOCs for this AD, if requested using
the procedures found in 14 CFR 39.19. In accordance with 14 CFR
39.19, send your request to your principal inspector or local Flight
Standards District Office, as appropriate. If sending information
directly to the International Branch, send it to ATTN: Vladimir
Ulyanov, Aerospace Engineer, International Branch, ANM-116,
Transport Airplane Directorate, FAA, 1601 Lind Avenue SW., Renton,
WA 98057-3356; telephone<PHONE_NUMBER>; fax<PHONE_NUMBER>.
Information may be emailed to<EMAIL_ADDRESS>
Before using any approved AMOC, notify your appropriate principal
inspector, or lacking a principal inspector, the manager of the
local flight standards district office/certificate holding district
office. The AMOC approval letter must specifically reference this
AD.
    (2) Contacting the Manufacturer: For any requirement in this AD
to obtain corrective actions from a manufacturer, the action must be
accomplished using a method approved by the Manager, International
Branch, ANM-116, Transport Airplane Directorate, FAA; or EASA; or
Airbus's EASA DOA. If approved by the DOA, the approval must include
the DOA-authorized signature.

(l) Related Information

    (1) Refer to Mandatory Continuing Airworthiness Information
(MCAI) EASA Airworthiness Directive 2013-0270R1, dated November 27,
2013, for related information. This MCAI may be found in the AD
docket on the Internet at http://www.regulations.gov by searching
for and locating Docket No. FAA-2014-0525.
    (2) For service information identified in this AD, contact
Airbus SAS, Airworthiness Office--EAL, 1 Rond Point Maurice
Bellonte, 31707 Blagnac Cedex, France; telephone +33 5 61 93 36 96;
fax +33 5 61 93 45 80; email<EMAIL_ADDRESS>
Internet http://www.airbus.com. You may view this service
information at the FAA, Transport Airplane Directorate, 1601 Lind
Avenue SW., Renton, WA. For information on the availability of this
material at the FAA, call<PHONE_NUMBER>.

    Issued in Renton, Washington, on July 30, 2014.
Jeffrey E. Duven,
Manager, Transport Airplane Directorate, Aircraft Certification
Service.
[FR Doc. 2014-19155 Filed 8-12-14; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910-13-P


[Federal Register Volume 77, Number 13 (Friday, January 20, 2012)]
[Notices]
[Pages 2977-2979]
[FR Doc No: 2012-1014]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY

[EPA-HQ-RCRA-2011-0625; FRL-9510-6]

Agency Information Collection Activities; Submission to OMB for
Review and Approval; Comment Request; Identification, Listing and
Rulemaking Petitions (Renewal)

AGENCY: Environmental Protection Agency (EPA).

ACTION: Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: In compliance with the Paperwork Reduction Act (PRA) (44
U.S.C. 3501 et seq.), this document announces that an Information

Collection Request (ICR) has been forwarded to the Office of Management
and Budget (OMB) for review and approval. This is a request to renew an
existing approved collection. The ICR, which is abstracted below,
describes the nature of the information collection and its estimated
burden and cost.

DATES: Additional comments may be submitted on or before February 21,
2012.

ADDRESSES: Submit your comments, referencing Docket ID No. EPA-HQ-RCRA-
2011-0625, to (1) EPA online using www.regulations.gov (our preferred
method), by email to<EMAIL_ADDRESS>or by mail to: EPA Docket
Center, Environmental Protection Agency, Mail Code 28221T, 1200
Pennsylvania Avenue NW., Washington, DC 20460, and (2) OMB by mail to:
Office of Information and Regulatory Affairs, Office of Management and
Budget (OMB), Attention: Desk Officer for EPA, 725 17th Street NW.,
Washington, DC 20503.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Melissa Kaps, Materials Recovery and
Waste Management Division, Office of Resource Conservation and
Recovery, (5304P), Environmental Protection Agency, 1200 Pennsylvania
Avenue NW., Washington, DC 20460; telephone number:<PHONE_NUMBER>; fax
number:<PHONE_NUMBER>; email address<EMAIL_ADDRESS>
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: EPA has submitted the following ICR to OMB
for review and approval according to the procedures prescribed in 5 CFR
1320.12. On August 9, 2011 (76 FR 48856), EPA sought comments on this
ICR pursuant to 5 CFR 1320.8(d). EPA received no comments. Any
additional comments on this ICR should be submitted to EPA and OMB
within 30 days of this notice.
    EPA has established a public docket for this ICR under Docket ID
No. EPA-HQ-RCRA-2011-0625, which is available for online viewing at
www.regulations.gov, or in person viewing at the RCRA Docket in the EPA
Docket Center (EPA/DC), EPA West, Room 3334, 1301 Constitution Ave.
NW., Washington, DC. The EPA/DC Public Reading Room is open from 8:30
a.m. to 4:30 p.m., Monday through Friday, excluding legal holidays. The
telephone number for the Reading Room is<PHONE_NUMBER>, and the
telephone number for the RCRA Docket is<PHONE_NUMBER>.
    Use EPA's electronic docket and comment system at
www.regulations.gov, to submit or view public comments, access the
index listing of the contents of the docket, and to access those
documents in the docket that are available electronically. Once in the
system, select ``docket search,'' then key in the docket ID number
identified above. Please note that EPA's policy is that public
comments, whether submitted electronically or in paper, will be made
available for public viewing at www.regulations.gov as EPA receives
them and without change, unless the comment contains copyrighted
material, confidential business information (CBI), or other information
whose public disclosure is restricted by statute. For further
information about the electronic docket, go to www.regulations.gov.
    Title: Identification, Listing and Rulemaking Petitions (Renewal).
    ICR numbers: EPA ICR No. 1189.24, OMB Control No. 2050-0053.
    ICR Status: This ICR is scheduled to expire on January 31, 2012.
Under OMB regulations, the Agency may continue to conduct or sponsor
the collection of information while this submission is pending at OMB.
An Agency may not conduct or sponsor, and a person is not required to
respond to, a collection of information, unless it displays a currently
valid OMB control number. The OMB control numbers for EPA's regulations
in title 40 of the CFR, after appearing in the Federal Register when
approved, are listed in 40 CFR part 9, are displayed either by
publication in the Federal Register or by other appropriate means, such
as on the related collection instrument or form, if applicable. The
display of OMB control numbers in certain EPA regulations is
consolidated in 40 CFR part 9.
    Abstract: Under the authority of the Resource Conservation and
Recovery Act of 1976 (RCRA), as amended, Congress directed the U.S.
Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) to implement a comprehensive
program for the safe management of hazardous waste. In addition,
Congress wrote that ``[a]ny person may petition the Administrator for
the promulgation, amendment or repeal of any regulation'' under RCRA
(section 7004(a)).
    40 CFR parts 260 and 261 contain provisions that allow regulated
entities to apply for petitions, variances, exclusions, and exemptions
from various RCRA requirements.
    Under 40 CFR 260.20(b), all rulemaking petitioners must submit
basic information with their demonstrations, including name, address,
and statement of interest in the proposed action. Under Sec.  260.21,
all petitioners for equivalent testing or analytical methods must
include specific information in their petitions and demonstrate to the
satisfaction of the Administrator that the proposed method is equal to,
or superior to, the corresponding method in terms of its sensitivity,
accuracy, and reproducibility. Under Sec.  260.22, petitions to amend
part 261 to exclude a waste produced at a particular facility (more
simply, to delist a waste) must meet extensive informational
requirements. When a petition is submitted, the Agency reviews
materials, deliberates, publishes its tentative decision in the Federal
Register, and requests public comment. EPA also may hold informal
public hearings (if requested by an interested person or at the
discretion of the Administrator) to hear oral comments on its tentative
decision. After evaluating all comments, EPA publishes its final
decision in the Federal Register.
    Burden Statement: The annual public reporting burden for this ICR
is estimated to average 25 hours per response, and the annual
recordkeeping burden for this ICR is estimated to average 2 hours per
response. Combined, the annual public reporting and recordkeeping
burden for this collection of information is estimated to average 26
hours per response. Burden means the total time, effort, or financial
resources expended by persons to generate, maintain, retain, or
disclose or provide information to or for a Federal agency. This
includes the time needed to review instructions; develop, acquire,
install, and utilize technology and systems for the purposes of
collecting, validating, and verifying information, processing and
maintaining information, and disclosing and providing information;
adjust the existing ways to comply with any previously applicable
instructions and requirements which have subsequently changed; train
personnel to be able to respond to a collection of information; search
data sources; complete and review the collection of information; and
transmit or otherwise disclose the information.
    Respondents/Affected Entities: Businesses/industries subject to the
regulations under 40 CFR Parts 260 and 261.
    Estimated Number of Respondents: 2,603.
    Frequency of Response: On occasion.
    Estimated Total Annual Hour Burden: 68,923.
    Estimated Total Annual Cost: $12,504,987, includes $9,660,864
annualized O&M costs and $2,844,124 annualized labor costs.
    Changes in the Estimates: There is a decrease of 4,864 hours in the
total estimated burden currently identified in

the OMB Inventory of Approved ICR Burdens. This decrease is an
adjustment to the existing estimates based on data gathered through
consultations with EPA Regional and State offices and the regulated
community, not due to program changes.

John Moses,
Director, Collection Strategies Division.
[FR Doc. 2012-1014 Filed 1-19-12; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6560-50-P


[Federal Register Volume 80, Number 55 (Monday, March 23, 2015)]
[Notices]
[Pages 15210-15211]
[FR Doc No: 2015-06591]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY

[EPA-HQ-OARM-2015-0210; FRL 9924-95-OARM]

National and Governmental Advisory Committees to the U.S.
Representative to the Commission for Environmental Cooperation

AGENCY: Environmental Protection Agency (EPA).

ACTION: Notice of Advisory Committee meeting.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: Under the Federal Advisory Committee Act, Public Law 92-463,
the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) gives notice of a meeting of
the National Advisory Committee (NAC) and Governmental Advisory
Committee (GAC) to the U.S. Representative to the North American
Commission for Environmental Cooperation (CEC). The National and
Governmental Advisory Committees advise the EPA Administrator in her
capacity as the U.S. Representative to the CEC Council. The committees
are authorized under Articles 17 and 18 of the North American Agreement
on Environmental Cooperation (NAAEC), North American Free Trade
Agreement Implementation Act, Public Law 103-182, and as directed by
Executive Order 12915, entitled ``Federal Implementation of the North
American Agreement on Environmental Cooperation.'' The NAC is composed
of 15 members

representing academia, environmental non-governmental organizations,
and private industry. The GAC consists of 14 members representing
state, local, and tribal governments. The committees are responsible
for providing advice to the U.S. Representative on a wide range of
strategic, scientific, technological, regulatory, and economic issues
related to implementation and further elaboration of the NAAEC.
    The purpose of the meeting is to provide advice on issues related
to the CEC's draft Operational Plan and Budget for 2015-16, the CEC's
draft Strategic Plan for 2015-2020, and to discuss additional trade and
environment issues. The meeting will also include a public comment
session. The agenda, meeting materials, and general information about
the NAC and GAC will be available at http://www2.epa.gov/faca/nac-gac.

DATES: The National and Governmental Advisory Committees will hold an
open meeting on Thursday, April 16, 2015 from 9:00 a.m. to 5:00 p.m.,
and Friday, April 17, 2014 from 9:00 a.m. until 3:00 p.m.

ADDRESSES: The meeting will be held at the U.S. EPA, Conference Room B-
305, located in the William Jefferson Clinton North Building, 1200
Pennsylvania Ave. NW., Washington, DC 20004. Telephone:<PHONE_NUMBER>.
The meeting is open to the public, with limited seating on a first-
come, first-served basis.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Oscar Carrillo, Designated Federal
Officer<EMAIL_ADDRESS>202-564-0347, U.S. EPA, Office of
Diversity, Advisory Committee Management and Outreach (1601-M), 1200
Pennsylvania Avenue NW., Washington, DC 20460.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Requests to make oral comments, or provide
written comments to the committees, should be sent to Oscar Carrillo,
Designated Federal Officer, at the contact information above. If you
plan to attend, please register with Ms. Stephanie McCoy, by April 9th
by calling<PHONE_NUMBER> or via email at<EMAIL_ADDRESS>Please
provide your name, organization, address and telephone number.
    Meeting Access: For information on access or services for
individuals with disabilities, or to request accommodation of a
disability, please contact Oscar Carrillo, at least 10 days prior to
the meeting to give EPA as much time as possible to process your
request.

    Dated: March 12, 2015.
Oscar Carrillo,
Designated Federal Officer.
[FR Doc. 2015-06591 Filed 3-20-15; 8:45 am]
 BILLING CODE 6560-50-P


[Federal Register Volume 78, Number 92 (Monday, May 13, 2013)]
[Notices]
[Page 28008]
[FR Doc No: 2013-11358]

=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

Sunshine Act Meeting

    Notice is hereby given, pursuant to the provisions of the
Government in the Sunshine Act, Public Law 94-409, that the Securities
and Exchange Commission will hold a Closed Meeting on Thursday, May 16,
2013 at 2:00 p.m.
    Commissioners, Counsel to the Commissioners, the Secretary to the
Commission, and recording secretaries will attend the Closed Meeting.
Certain staff members who have an interest in the matters also may be
present.
    The General Counsel of the Commission, or her designee, has
certified that, in his opinion, one or more of the exemptions set forth
in 5 U.S.C. 552b(c)(3), (5), (7), 9(B) and (10) and 17 CFR
200.402(a)(3), (5), (7), 9(ii) and (10), permit consideration of the
scheduled matters at the Closed Meeting.
    Commissioner Paredes, as duty officer, voted to consider the items
listed for the Closed Meeting in a closed session.
    The subject matter of the Closed Meeting will be:
    Institution and settlement of injunctive actions;
    Institution and settlement of administrative proceedings; and
    Other matters relating to enforcement proceedings.
    At times, changes in Commission priorities require alterations in
the scheduling of meeting items.
    For further information and to ascertain what, if any, matters have
been added, deleted or postponed, please contact the Office of the
Secretary at<PHONE_NUMBER>.

    Dated: May 8, 2013.
Elizabeth M. Murphy,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2013-11358 Filed 5-9-13; 11:15 am]
BILLING CODE 8011-01-P


[Federal Register Volume 86, Number 200 (Wednesday, October 20, 2021)]
[Notices]
[Page 58083]
[FR Doc No: 2021-22782]

=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY

Coast Guard

[Docket No. USCG-2021-0592]

Recertification of Cool Inlet Regional Citizens' Advisory Council

AGENCY: Coast Guard, DHS.

ACTION: Notice of recertification.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Coast Guard announces the recertification of the Cook
Inlet Regional Citizens' Advisory Council (CIRCAC) as an alternative
voluntary advisory group for Cook Inlet, Alaska. This certification
allows the CIRCAC to monitor the activities of terminal facilities and
crude oil tankers under the Cook Inlet Program established by the Oil
Terminal and Oil Tanker Environmental Oversight and Monitoring Act of
1990.

DATES: This recertification is effective for the period from September
1, 2021 through August 31, 2022.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: For information about this document,
call or email LT Lauren Bloch, Seventeenth Coast Guard District (dpi),
by phone at<PHONE_NUMBER> or email at [email protected].

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

Background and Purpose

    The Coast Guard published guidelines on December 31, 1992 (57 FR
62600), to assist groups seeking recertification under the Oil Terminal
and Oil Tanker Environmental Oversight and Monitoring Act of 1990 (33
U.S.C. 2732) (the Act). The Coast Guard issued a policy statement on
July 7, 1993 (58 FR 36504), to clarify the factors that the Coast Guard
would be considering in making its determination as to whether advisory
groups should be certified in accordance with the Act, and the
procedures which the Coast Guard would follow in meeting its
certification responsibilities under the Act.
    Most recently, on September 16, 2002 (67 FR 58440), the Coast Guard
changed its policy on recertification procedures for regional citizen's
advisory council by requiring applicants to provide comprehensive
information every three years. For each of the two years between the
triennial application procedures, applicants submit a letter requesting
recertification that includes a description of any substantive changes
to the information provided at the previous triennial recertification.
Further, public comment is only solicited during the triennial
comprehensive review.

Recertification

    By letter dated August 27, 2021, the Commander, Seventeenth Coast
Guard District, certified that the CIRCAC qualifies as an alternative
voluntary advisory group under 33 U.S.C. 2732(o). This recertification
terminates on August 31, 2022.

    Dated: August 27, 2021.
Nathan A. Moore,
Rear Admiral, U.S. Coast Guard, Commander, Seventeenth Coast Guard
District.
[FR Doc. 2021-22782 Filed 10-19-21; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 9110-04-P


[Federal Register Volume 87, Number 220 (Wednesday, November 16, 2022)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Pages 68627-68628]
[FR Doc No: 2022-24800]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION

Federal Aviation Administration

14 CFR Part 71

[Docket No. FAA-2022-0764; Airspace Docket No. 21-ANM-37]
RIN 2120-AA66

Modification of Class D Airspace and Class E Airspace; Bozeman
Yellowstone International Airport, MT

AGENCY: Federal Aviation Administration (FAA), Department of
Transportation (DOT).

ACTION: Final rule.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: This action modifies the Class D and E surface areas, the
Class E airspace area designated as an extension to a Class D or E
surface area, and the Class E airspace extending upward from 700 feet
above the surface at Bozeman Yellowstone International Airport, MT.
Additionally, this action makes several administrative amendments to
update the airport's legal descriptions. These actions support the
safety and management of instrument flight rules (IFR) and visual
flight rules (VFR) operations at the airport.

DATES: Effective 0901 UTC, December 29, 2022. The Director of the
Federal Register approves this incorporation by reference under Title 1
CFR part 51, subject to the annual revision of FAA Order JO 7400.11,
Airspace Designations and Reporting Points, and publication of
conforming amendments.

ADDRESSES: FAA Order JO 7400.11G, and subsequent amendments can be
viewed online at www.faa.gov/air_traffic/publications/. For further
information, you can contact the Airspace Policy Group, Federal
Aviation Administration, 800 Independence Avenue SW, Washington, DC
20591; telephone:<PHONE_NUMBER>.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Nathan A. Chaffman, Federal Aviation
Administration, Western Service Center, Operations Support Group, 2200
S 216th Street, Des Moines, WA 98198; telephone<PHONE_NUMBER>.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

Authority for This Rulemaking

    The FAA's authority to issue rules regarding aviation safety is
found in Title 49 of the United States Code. Subtitle I, Section 106
describes the authority of the FAA Administrator. Subtitle VII,
Aviation Programs, describes in more detail the scope of the agency's
authority. This rulemaking is promulgated under the authority described
in Subtitle VII, Part A, Subpart I, Section 40103. Under that section,
the FAA is charged with prescribing regulations to assign the use of
airspace necessary to ensure the safety of aircraft and the efficient
use of airspace. This regulation is within the scope of that authority,
as it would modify the Class D and Class E airspace at Bozeman
Yellowstone International Airport, MT, to support VFR and IFR
operations at the airport.

History

    The FAA published a notice of proposed rulemaking (NPRM) in the
Federal Register for FAA-2022-0764 (87 FR 45725; July 29, 2022) to
modify the Class D and E surface areas, the Class E airspace area
designated as an extension to a Class D or E surface area, and the
Class E airspace extending upward from 700 feet above the surface. It
also proposed administrative changes to the airport's legal
descriptions. Interested parties were invited to participate in this
rulemaking effort by submitting written comments on the proposal to the
FAA. Two comments were received, although neither were germane to the
proposal.
    Subsequent to publication of the NPRM in the Federal Register, the
FAA identified a discrepancy with the proposed Class E2 legal
description. It was inadvertently referred to as ``Class D'' in the
body of the description. This action corrects this error to read
``Class E'' Additionally, the proposed Class E6 legal description
required multiple modifications. The airport name is removed from the
description, as it is provided in the second line of the header and
duplication is not necessary. Lastly, the Class E6 legal description
contained exclusionary verbiage, which is removed as it is not
necessary.

Availability and Summary of Documents for Incorporation by Reference

    This document amends FAA Order JO 7400.11G, Airspace Designations
and Reporting Points, dated August 19, 2022, and effective September
15, 2022. FAA Order JO 7400.11G is publicly available as listed in the
ADDRESSES section of this document. FAA Order JO 7400.11G lists Class
A, B, C, D, and E airspace areas, air traffic service routes, and
reporting points.

The Rule

    The FAA is amending 14 CFR part 71 by modifying the Class D and E
surface areas, the Class E airspace area designated as an extension to
a Class D or E surface area, and the Class E airspace extending upward
from 700 feet above the surface.
    Class D airspace is intended to contain IFR arrival operations
while between the surface and 1,000 feet above the surface, and IFR
departure operations while between the surface and the base of adjacent
controlled airspace. The current Class D airspace radius is 5.4 miles,
which is excessive. This radius is reduced to 4.9 miles, as additional
airspace is not necessary. The Class D airspace is expanded to the
southeast of the airport due to rising terrain, as it's needed to
contain departures until reaching 700 feet above the surface.
    The Class E surface airspace is amended to be coincident with the
airport's Class D airspace legal description.
    The Class E airspace area designated as an extension to a Class D
or E surface area is removed southwest of the airport, as it is no
longer needed. The Class E airspace area designated as an extension to
a Class D or E surface area northwest of the airport is modified to
more appropriately contain arrivals on the ILS/LOC RWY 12 approach.
    The Class E airspace extending upward from 700 feet above the
surface around Bozeman Yellowstone International Airport is reduced
from a 13.5-mile radius to a 6.9-mile radius around the airport, as
additional airspace is not necessary to contain IFR departures flying
toward or over rising terrain. The Class E airspace extending upward
from 700 feet above the surface northwest of the airport is reduced, as
the existing airspace is excessive and not necessary. Class E airspace
extending upward from 700 feet above the surface is extended southeast
of the airport to contain IFR departures until reaching 1,200 feet
above the surface, and IFR arrivals descending below 1,500 feet above
the surface.
    Finally, this action makes several administrative modifications to
the airport's legal descriptions. The airport's geographic coordinates
in the Class D and E legal descriptions are updated to match the FAA's
database. The Class D and E2 legal descriptions are updated to replace
the outdated use of the phrases ``Notice to Airmen,'' and ``Airport/
Facility Directory.'' These phrases are amended to read ``Notice to Air
Missions'' and ``Chart Supplement,'' respectively, to align with the
FAA's current nomenclature. The airport name was removed from the Class
E6 legal description due to redundancy. Lastly, the phrase ``excluding
existing lateral limits of controlled airspace 12,000 feet MSL and
above,'' was removed as it is unnecessary.
    Class D, E2, E4, E5, and E6 airspace designations are published in

paragraphs 5000, 6002, 6004, 6005, and 6006, respectively, of FAA Order
JO 7400.11G, dated August 19, 2022, and effective September 15, 2022,
which is incorporated by reference in 14 CFR 71.1. The Class D and
Class E airspace designations listed in this document will be published
subsequently in FAA Order JO 7400.11.
    FAA Order JO 7400.11 is published annually and becomes effective on
September 15.

Regulatory Notices and Analyses

    The FAA has determined that this regulation only involves an
established body of technical regulations for which frequent and
routine amendments are necessary to keep them operationally current, is
non-controversial, and unlikely to result in adverse or negative
comments. It therefore: (1) is not a ``significant regulatory action''
under Executive Order 12866; (2) is not a ``significant rule'' under
DOT regulatory policies and procedures (44 FR 11034; February 26,
1979); and (3) does not warrant preparation of a regulatory evaluation
as the anticipated impact is so minimal. Since this is a routine matter
that will only affect air traffic procedures and air navigation, it is
certified that this rule, when promulgated, would not have a
significant economic impact on a substantial number of small entities
under the criteria of the Regulatory Flexibility Act.

Environmental Review

    The FAA has determined that this action qualifies for categorical
exclusion under the National Environmental Policy Act in accordance
with FAA Order 1050.1F, Environmental Impacts: Policies and Procedures,
paragraph 5-6.5a. This airspace action is not expected to cause any
potentially significant environmental impacts, and no extraordinary
circumstances exist that warrant the preparation of an environmental
assessment.

List of Subjects in 14 CFR 71

    Airspace, incorporation by reference, navigation (air).

Adoption of the Amendment

    In consideration of the foregoing, the FAA amends 14 CFR part 71 as
follows:

PART 71--DESIGNATION OF CLASS A, B, C, D, AND E AIRSPACE AREAS; AIR
TRAFFIC SERVICE ROUTES; AND REPORTING POINTS

0
1. The authority citation for 14 CFR part 71 continues to read as
follows:

    Authority: 49 U.S.C. 106(f), 106(g), 40103, 40113, 40120; E.O.
10854, 24 FR 9565, 3 CFR, 1959-1963 Comp., p. 389.

Sec.  71.1  [Amended]

0
2. The incorporation by reference in 14 CFR part 71.1 of FAA Order JO
7400.11G, Airspace Designations and Reporting Points, dated August 19,
2022, and effective September 15, 2022, is amended as follows:

Paragraph 5000 Class D Airspace.

* * * * *

ANM MT D Bozeman, MT [Amended]

Bozeman Yellowstone International Airport, MT
    (Lat. 45[deg]46'38'' N, long. 111[deg]09'01'' W)

    That airspace extending upward from the surface to and including
7,000 feet MSL within a 4.9-mile radius of Bozeman Yellowstone
International Airport, and within 2.0 miles each side of the
146[deg] bearing from the airport extending from the 4.9-mile radius
of the airport to 6.5 miles southeast of the airport. This Class D
airspace area is effective during the specific dates and times
established in advance by a Notice to Air Missions. The effective
date and time will thereafter be continuously published in the Chart
Supplement.

Paragraph 6002 Class E Airspace Areas Designated as a Surface Area.

* * * * *

ANM MT E2 Bozeman, MT [Amended]

Bozeman Yellowstone International Airport, MT
    (Lat. 45[deg]46'38'' N, long. 111[deg]09'01'' W)

    That airspace extending upward from the surface within a 4.9-
mile radius of Bozeman Yellowstone International Airport, and within
2.0 miles each side of the 146[deg] bearing from the airport
extending from the 4.9-mile radius of the airport to 6.5 miles
southeast of the airport. This Class E airspace area is effective
during the specific dates and times established in advance by a
Notice to Air Missions. The effective date and time will thereafter
be continuously published in the Chart Supplement.

Paragraph 6004 Class E Airspace Areas Designated as an Extension to
a Class D or Class E.

* * * * *

ANM MT E4 Bozeman, MT [Amended]

Bozeman Yellowstone International Airport, MT
    (Lat. 45[deg]46'38'' N, long. 111[deg]09'01'' W)

    That airspace extending upward from the surface within 3.4 miles
each side of the 316[deg] bearing from the Bozeman Yellowstone
International Airport extending from the 4.9- mile radius of the
airport to 13.5 miles northwest of the airport.

Paragraph 6005 Class E Airspace Areas Extending Upward From 700
Feet or More Above the Surface of the Earth.

* * * * *

ANM MT E5 Bozeman, MT [Amended]

Bozeman Yellowstone International Airport, MT
    (Lat. 45[deg]46'38'' N, long. 111[deg]09'01'' W)

    That airspace extending upward from 700 feet above the surface
within a 6.9-mile radius from the Bozeman Yellowstone International
Airport, and within 1.8 miles each side of the 131[deg] bearing from
the airport extending from the 6.9-mile radius to 14.3 miles
southeast of the airport, and within 2.7 miles northeast and 2.9
miles southwest of the 155[deg] bearing from the airport extending
from the 6.9-mile radius to 10.6 miles southeast of the airport, and
within 3.6 miles each side of the 316[deg] bearing from the airport
extending from the 6.9-mile radius to 15.5 miles northwest of the
airport.

Paragraph 6006 En Route Domestic Airspace Areas.

* * * * *

ANM MT E6 Bozeman, MT [Amended]

Bozeman Yellowstone International Airport, MT
    (Lat. 45[deg]46'38'' N, long. 111[deg]09'01'' W)

    That airspace extending upward from 1,200 feet above the surface
within a 50-mile radius of the airport.

    Issued in Des Moines, Washington, on November 8, 2022.
B.G. Chew,
Group Manager, Operations Support Group, Western Service Center.
[FR Doc. 2022-24800 Filed 11-15-22; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910-13-P