[Federal Register: December 2, 2008 (Volume 73, Number 232)]
[Notices]
[Page 73318-73319]
[DOCID:fr02de08-60]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission

[Project No. 2009-125]

Virginia Electric and Power Company; Notice of Application for
Amendment of License and Soliciting Comments, Motions To Intervene, and
Protests

November 25, 2008.
    Take notice that the following hydroelectric application has been
filed with the Commission and is available for public inspection:
    a. Application Type: Amendment to Recreation Plan.
    b. Project No: 2009-125.
    c. Date Filed: November 18, 2008.
    d. Applicant: Virginia Electric and Power Company.
    e. Name of Project: Roanoke Rapids and Gaston Project.
    f. Location: The project is located on the Roanoke River, in
Brunswick and Mecklenburg Counties, Virginia and Halifax, Warren, and
Northampton Counties, North Carolina.
    g. Filed Pursuant to: Federal Power Act, 16 U.S.C. 791a-825r.
    h. Applicant Contact: Mr. Jim Thornton, Technical Consultant,
Dominion Virginia Power, 5000 Dominion Blvd., 1NE, Glen Allen, VA
23060, Telephone:<PHONE_NUMBER>, and e-mail<EMAIL_ADDRESS>    i. FERC Contact: Mr. Lorance Yates, Telephone:<PHONE_NUMBER>, and
e-mail<EMAIL_ADDRESS>    j. Deadline for filing comments, motions to intervene, and protest:
December 26, 2008.
    All documents (original and eight copies) should be filed with:
Secretary, Federal Energy Regulatory Commission, 888 First Street, NE.,
Washington, DC 20426.
    The Commission's Rules of Practice and Procedure require all
interveners filing documents with the Commission to serve a copy of
that document on each person whose name appears on the official service
list for the project. Further, if an intervener files comments or
documents with the Commission relating to the merits of an issue that
may affect the responsibilities of a particular resource agency, they
must also serve a copy of the document on that resource agency. A copy
of any motion to intervene must also be served upon each representative
of the Applicant specified in the particular application.
    k. Description of Proposed Amendment: Virginia Electric and Power
Company proposes to place fencing to restrict public access to the most
turbulent waters of the Roanoke Rapids powerhouse tailrace. This
measure, for public safety, would move the delineated tailrace bank
fishing area about 600 feet east along the tailrace canal. Anglers
would continue to have access to the remaining 8,000 linear feet of the
tailrace canal. Also, at the request of the City of Roanoke Rapids, the
licensee would make improvements to the eastern trail access to the
tailrace canal by either constructing footbridges over two small
tributaries, where culvert pipes have washed out, or replacing the
culvert pipes.
    l. Locations of the Application: A copy of the application is
available for inspection and reproduction at the Commission's Public
Reference Room, located at 888 First Street, NE., Room 2A, Washington,
DC 20426, or by calling<PHONE_NUMBER>. This filing may also be viewed
on the Commission's Web site at http://www.ferc.gov using the
``eLibrary'' link. Enter the docket number excluding the last three
digits in the docket number field to access the document. You may also
register online at http://www.ferc.gov/docs-filing/esubscription.asp to
be notified via e-mail of new filings and issuances related to this or
other pending projects. For assistance, call 1-866-208-3676 or e-mail
<EMAIL_ADDRESS>for TTY, call<PHONE_NUMBER>. A copy is
also available for inspection and reproduction at the address in item
(h) above.
    m. Individuals desiring to be included on the Commission's mailing
list should so indicate by writing to the Secretary of the Commission.
    n. Comments, Protests, or Motions to Intervene: Anyone may submit
comments, a protest, or a motion to intervene in accordance with the
requirements of Rules of Practice and Procedure, 18 CFR 385.210, .211,
.214. In determining the appropriate action to take, the Commission
will consider all protests or other comments filed, but only those who
file a motion to intervene in accordance with the Commission's Rules
may become a party to the proceeding. Any comments, protests, or
motions to intervene must be received on or before the specified
comment date for the particular application.
    o. Any filings must bear in all capital letters the title
``COMMENTS'', ``PROTEST'', or ``MOTION TO INTERVENE'', as applicable,
and the Project Number of the particular application to which the
filing refers.
    p. Agency Comments: Federal, state, and local agencies are invited
to file comments on the described application. A copy of the
application may be

obtained by agencies directly from the Applicant. If an agency does not
file comments within the time specified for filing comments, it will be
presumed to have no comments. One copy of an agency's comments must
also be sent to the Applicant's representatives.
    q. Comments, protests and interventions may be filed electronically
via the Internet in lieu of paper. See, 18 CFR 385.2001(a)(1)(iii) and
the instructions on the Commission's Web site at http://www.ferc.gov
under the ``e-Filing'' link.

Kimberly D. Bose,
Secretary.
 [FR Doc. E8-28579 Filed 12-1-08; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 6717-01-P


--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Monsanto Company authorizes the EPA to publish the following summary of the petition to comply with the Food Quality Protection Act of 1996. An electronic copy is provided with this submission.

ACTION: Notice of filing of pesticide petition and request for comment

Agency: Environmental Protection Agency (EPA)

Identifier: [EPA-HQ-OPP-2018-0243; FRL-xxxx-xx]

Administrative Code Citation:  40 CFR Part 180

Synopsis
_________________________________________________________________

SUMMARY: This document announces the Agency's receipt of an initial filing of a pesticide petition requesting the modification of regulations for residues of a certain pesticide chemical in or on various food commodities.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

* * * * * * * * * * * * * *

Amended Tolerances

1. PP IN-11139. (EPA-HQ-OPP-2018-0243) Monsanto Company, 700 Chesterfield Parkway West, St. Louis, Missouri, proposes, pursuant to section 408(d) of the Federal Food, Drug and Cosmetic Act (FFDCA), 21 U.S.C. 346a(d), to amend 40 CFR Part 180.471 (a) General., by establishing tolerances for residues of the safener (inert ingredient), furilazole, 3-dichloroacetyl-5-(2-furanyl)-2,2-dimethyloxazolidine, in or on the raw agricultural commodities, corn, sweet, forage at 0.01 ppm, corn, sweet, kernel plus cob with husks removed at 0.01 ppm, and, corn, sweet, stover at 0.01 ppm.  Monsanto Company has submitted a rationale for the use of existing metabolism and residue data in field corn and sorghum as sufficient to support establishing tolerances for furilazole in raw agricultural commodities for sweet corn.  Contact:  RD.

A.	Residue Chemistry

	1.  Plant Metabolism. The metabolism in corn has been studied with radiolabeled furalizole in the green house and in the field.  Parent furilazole was not found in any of the corn samples. The metabolism of furilazole was also studied in a parallel experiment with sorghum in the field study with corn.  Parent furilazole was not found in any of the sorghum samples.  Furilazole is rapidly and extensively metabolized to a large number of highly polar metabolites characterized as weak organic acids or residues conjugated to natural sugars.  Similar metabolism with no parent furilazole is expected in sweet corn commodities.

      2.  Analytical method. An adequate analytical enforcement method for residues of furilazole in crops has been approved.  The method involves gas liquid chromatography coupled with either electron capture detection for corn or mass spectrometry with selected ion monitoring for sorghum.  The only difference between the methods is the technique used for detection.  Both approaches have a verified limit of quantitation of 0.01 ppm for parent furilazole in corn grain, forage, and stover, and sorghum grain, forage, stover, flour, and bran. The method involving electron capture detection is analogous to that validated by the Agency.  The analytical methodology developed for corn and sorghum is expected to apply to sweet corn.

      3.  Magnitude of the residues. Monsanto has conducted a field residue study at twenty sites with furilazole applied preemergence to corn at rates up to 0.75 pound per acre.  Analysis of corn forage, silage, fodder, and grain showed no residues of furilazole parent with an analytical method that is validated at the lower limit of 0.01 ppm.  Field residue studies at two sites with furilazole applied preemergence to corn at exaggerated rates up to 117 times the proposed maximum use rate showed no measurable residues (< 0.01 ppm) of furilazole parent in corn grain.  A field residue study has been conducted at thirteen sites with furilazole applied preemergence to sorghum according to labeled use rates.  Analysis of sorghum forage, stover, grain, flour and bran showed no residues of furilazole parent with an analytical method that was validated at the lower limit of 0.01 ppm.  No measurable residues (<0.01 ppm) of furilazole parent are expected in sweet corn from labeled use rates.

B.	Toxicological Profile
	A summary of the toxicology data supporting this petition was published in the Federal Register on April 3, 2002 (67 FR 15727) (FRL-6828-4).

C.	Aggregate Exposure

1.  Dietary exposure.  Potential dietary (food and water) exposures resulting from the use of furilazole were estimated using the Dietary Exposure Evaluation Model-Food Consumption Intake Database based on NHANES 2-day food consumption data for 2005-2010 and food translations based on EPA/USDA FCID recipe set as of August 2014 (DEEM-FCID, ver. 4.02, 05-10-c).  To assess potential exposures from food, Monsanto made the very conservative assumption that the entire corn and sorghum crops were treated with furilazole (i.e., 100% crop treated), that field corn, pop corn, sorghum and sweet corn (kernels plus cob with husk removed) commodities contain residues of furilazole at the existing or proposed tolerance level of their associated raw agricultural commodities, and that no losses occurred during storage, processing or cooking. The default processing factor of 1.5 was used for corn syrup.  For drinking water, Monsanto used the conservative estimates of furilazole concentration in surface water previously calculated by EPA and published in the Federal Register on April 3, 2002 (67 FR 15727) (FRL-6828-4). For surface water, the EPA used the Pesticide Root Zone/Exposure Analysis Modeling System (PRZM/EXAMS) model to calculate Estimated Environmental Concentrations (EECs) of 1.2 parts per billion (ppb), 0.8 ppb and 0.22 ppb for acute, chronic (non-cancer) and cancer risk assessments, respectively. Ground water residues of 0.02 ppb for all exposure scenarios were modeled using Screening Concentrations in Ground Water (SCI-GROW).

2. Non-dietary exposure. There are no residential or non-agricultural uses of furilazole. Therefore, non-dietary, non-occupational exposures to furilazole are expected to be negligible and were not included within this risk assessment.

D. Cumulative Effects
Monsanto has no reliable data or information to suggest that furilazole shares a common mechanism of toxicity with any other chemical. Therefore, only the potential effects of furilazole
are addressed in this document.

E. Safety Determination

1. U.S. population. The toxicology endpoints used to assess potential acute, chronic and carcinogenic risks from furilazole were those previously identified by the EPA and published in
the Federal Register on April 3, 2002 (67 FR 15727), except as noted below. Acute dietary risks were assessed using an acute Population Adjusted Dose (aPAD) of 0.1 milligrams/kilogram/day (mg/kg/day). This was based on a No Observed Adverse Effect Level (NOAEL) of 10 mg/kg/day for increased resorptions in a developmental toxicity study in rats and a 100-fold uncertainty factor (UF). The only population subgroup of potential concern for this effect was females aged 13 and older because this is an in-utero effect applicable only to females of childbearing age. Acute risk assessments for other population subgroups were not conducted since no other acute toxicology endpoint was identified.

Potential risks from chronic dietary exposure for all population subgroups were assessed using a chronic Population Adjusted Dose (cPAD) of 0.0026 mg/kg/day.  This was based on a NOAEL of 0.26 mg/kg/day for increased liver and kidney weights in a chronic rat study and an UF of 100. The EPA previously utilized a cPAD of 0.0009 mg/kg/day based on the same NOAEL but with an UF of 300 rather than 100 to account for the lack of a one-year dog study. However, since a one-year dog study is no longer typically required, Monsanto believes the additional 3X UF is no longer appropriate. Since furilazole is classified by the EPA as ``likely to be carcinogenic to humans'', potential carcinogenic risks have been quantified using the cancer slope factor (Q*) of 0.0274 (mg/kg/day)[ - 1] previously used by EPA.

The toxicology and exposure information available for furilazole was considered to be valid, reliable and complete according to current regulatory standards. No evidence of increased susceptibility of offspring was noted in rats or rabbits following in utero and/or postnatal exposure to furilazole. Therefore, the Agency has determined that no additional Food Quality Protection Act (FQPA) safety factor was needed to protect infants or children.

2. Acute risk. Based on the above assumptions, the 95th percentile for acute dietary exposure to furilazole for females age 13 to 50 was estimated to be 0.000084 mg/kg/day. This exposure represents 0.08% of the aPAD. In general, exposures utilizing less than 100% of the aPAD are not of concern. Therefore, Monsanto concludes that there is a reasonable certainty that acute dietary exposure to furilazole will not pose a significant risk to human health.

3. Chronic (non-cancer) risk. Based on the above assumptions, chronic dietary exposure to furilazole for the overall U.S. population was estimated to be 0.000035 mg/kg/day. This represents about 1.3% of the cPAD. Chronic dietary exposure for non-nursing infants, the most highly exposed population subgroup, was estimated to be 0.000145 mg/kg/day, which represents 5.6% of the cPAD. Both of these values are well below 100% of the cPAD. Therefore, Monsanto concludes that there is a reasonable certainty that chronic dietary exposure to furilazole will not pose a significant risk to human health.

4. Cancer risk. Based on the above assumptions, the average daily lifetime exposure to furilazole from food for the overall U.S. population was estimated to be 0.000023 mg/kg/day. Using linear low-dose extrapolation, the 95% upper confidence limit of the lifetime cancer risk associated with this level of exposure was estimated to be 6.4 x 10[ - 7]. Cancer risks less than approximately 1 x 10[ - 6] are generally considered to be negligible. Therefore, Monsanto concludes that there is a reasonable certainty that lifetime aggregate exposure to furilazole will not pose a significant risk of cancer.

5. Overall conclusion of safety. Based on the data summarized herein, Monsanto concludes that there is a reasonable certainty that no harm will result to the U.S. population, including
infants and children, from the current and proposed uses of furilazole.

F. International Tolerances
The Codex Alimentarius Commission has not established any maximum residue levels for furilazole.


Comment Info: =================

General Comment:I use electronic cigarettes.  I have been using them for  over 8 months and was able to fully quit a pack a day smoking habit in  a week, and have dropped my nicotine level to only 6mg concentrations of nicotine e-liquid. I would like to fully address my concerns with the proposed deeming regulations.  BUT a 75 day comment period is insufficient time for the vaping industry and the wider vaping community to read and appropriately comment on the proposed deeming regulations. I respectfully request that the period for comment be extended to 180 days.


[Federal Register Volume 77, Number 138 (Wednesday, July 18, 2012)]
[Notices]
[Pages 42321-42322]
[FR Doc No: 2012-17408]

=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY

Coast Guard

[USCG-2012-0231]

Collection of Information Under Review by Office of Management
and Budget

AGENCY: Coast Guard, DHS.

ACTION: Thirty-day notice requesting comments.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: In compliance with the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 the
U.S. Coast Guard is forwarding an Information Collection Request (ICR),
abstracted below, to the Office of Management and Budget (OMB), Office
of Information and Regulatory Affairs (OIRA), requesting an extension
of its approval for the following collection of information: 1625-0046,
Certificates of Financial Responsibility under the Oil Pollution Act of
1990. Our ICR describes the information we seek to collect from the
public. Review and comments by OIRA ensure we only impose paperwork
burdens commensurate with our performance of duties.

DATES: Comments must reach the Coast Guard and OIRA on or before August
17, 2012.

ADDRESSES: You may submit comments identified by Coast Guard docket
number [USCG-2012-0231] to the Docket Management Facility (DMF) at the
U.S. Department of Transportation (DOT) and/or to OIRA. To avoid
duplicate submissions, please use only one of the following means:
    (1) Online: (a) To Coast Guard docket at http://www.regulations.gov. (b) To OIRA by email via<EMAIL_ADDRESS>    (2) Mail: (a) DMF (M-30), DOT, West Building Ground Floor, Room
W12-140, 1200 New Jersey Avenue SE., Washington, DC 20590-0001. (b) To
OIRA, 725 17th Street NW., Washington, DC 20503, attention Desk Officer
for the Coast Guard.
    (3) Hand Delivery: To DMF address above, between 9 a.m. and 5 p.m.,
Monday through Friday, except Federal holidays. The telephone number is
202-366-9329.
    (4) Fax: (a) To DMF,<PHONE_NUMBER>. (b) To OIRA at<PHONE_NUMBER>. To
ensure your comments are received in a timely manner, mark the fax,
attention Desk Officer for the Coast Guard.
    The DMF maintains the public docket for this Notice. Comments and
material received from the public, as well as documents mentioned in
this Notice as being available in the docket, will become part of the
docket and will be available for inspection or copying at room W12-140
on the West Building Ground Floor, 1200 New Jersey Avenue SE.,
Washington, DC, between 9 a.m. and 5 p.m., Monday through Friday,
except Federal holidays. You may also find the docket on the Internet
at http://www.regulations.gov.
    A copy of the ICR is available through the docket on the Internet
at http://www.regulations.gov. Additionally, copies are available from:
COMMANDANT (CG-611), ATTN: PAPERWORK REDUCTION ACT MANAGER, U.S. COAST
GUARD, 2100 2ND ST SW., STOP 7101, WASHINGTON DC 20593-7101.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Ms. Kenlinishia Tyler, Office of
Information Management, telephone<PHONE_NUMBER> or fax<PHONE_NUMBER>, for
questions on these documents. Contact Ms. Renee V. Wright, Program
Manager, Docket Operations,<PHONE_NUMBER>, for questions on the docket.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

Public Participation and Request for Comments

    This Notice relies on the authority of the Paperwork Reduction Act
of 1995; 44 U.S.C. Chapter 35, as amended. An ICR is an application to
OIRA seeking the approval, extension, or renewal of a Coast Guard
collection of information (Collection). The ICR contains information
describing the Collection's purpose, the Collection's likely burden on
the affected public, an explanation of the necessity of the Collection,
and other important information describing the Collection. There is one
ICR for each Collection.
    The Coast Guard invites comments on whether this ICR should be
granted based on the Collection being necessary for the proper
performance of Departmental functions. In particular, the Coast Guard
would appreciate comments addressing: (1) The practical utility of the
Collection; (2) the accuracy of the estimated burden of the Collection;
(3) ways to enhance the quality, utility, and clarity of information
subject to the Collection; and (4) ways to minimize the burden of the
Collection on respondents, including the use of automated collection
techniques or other forms of information technology. These comments
will help OIRA determine whether to approve the ICR referred to in this
Notice.
    We encourage you to respond to this request by submitting comments
and related materials. Comments to Coast Guard or OIRA must contain the
OMB Control Number of the ICR. They must also contain the docket number
of this request, [USCG 2012-0231], and must be received by August 17,
2012. We will post all comments received, without change, to http://www.regulations.gov. They will include any personal information you
provide. We have an agreement with DOT to use their DMF. Please see the
``Privacy Act'' paragraph below.

Submitting Comments

    If you submit a comment, please include the docket number [USCG-
2012-0231], indicate the specific section of the document to which each
comment applies, providing a reason for each comment. You may submit
your comments and material online (via http://www.regulations.gov), by
fax, mail, or hand delivery, but please use only one of these means. If
you submit a comment online via www.regulations.gov, it will be

considered received by the Coast Guard when you successfully transmit
the comment. If you fax, hand deliver, or mail your comment, it will be
considered as having been received by the Coast Guard when it is
received at the DMF. We recommend you include your name, mailing
address, an email address, or other contact information in the body of
your document so that we can contact you if we have questions regarding
your submission.
    You may submit comments and material by electronic means, mail,
fax, or delivery to the DMF at the address under ADDRESSES, but please
submit them by only one means. To submit your comment online, go to
http://www.regulations.gov, and type ``USCG-2012-0231'' in the
``Keyword'' box. If you submit your comments by mail or hand delivery,
submit them in an unbound format, no larger than 8\1/2\ by 11 inches,
suitable for copying and electronic filing. If you submit comments by
mail and would like to know that they reached the Facility, please
enclose a stamped, self-addressed postcard or envelope. We will
consider all comments and material received during the comment period
and will address them accordingly.

Viewing Comments and Documents

    To view comments, as well as documents mentioned in this Notice as
being available in the docket, go to http://www.regulations.gov, click
on the ``read comments'' box, which will then become highlighted in
blue. In the ``Keyword'' box insert ``USCG-2012-0231'' and click
``Search.'' Click the ``Open Docket Folder'' in the ``Actions'' column.
You may also visit the DMF in Room W12-140 on the ground floor of the
DOT West Building, 1200 New Jersey Avenue SE., Washington, DC 20590,
between 9 a.m. and 5 p.m., Monday through Friday, except Federal
holidays.
    OIRA posts its decisions on ICRs online at http://www.reginfo.gov/public/do/PRAMain after the comment period for each ICR. An OMB Notice
of Action on each ICR will become available via a hyperlink in the OMB
Control Number: 1625-0046.

Privacy Act

    Anyone can search the electronic form of comments received in
dockets by the name of the individual submitting the comment (or
signing the comment, if submitted on behalf of an association,
business, labor union, etc.). You may review a Privacy Act statement
regarding Coast Guard public dockets in the January 17, 2008, issue of
the Federal Register (73 FR 3316).

Previous Request for Comments

    This request provides a 30-day comment period required by OIRA. The
Coast Guard published the 60-day notice (77 FR 27472, May 10, 2012)
required by 44 U.S.C. 3506(c)(2). That Notice elicited no comments.

Information Collection Requests.

    Title: Certificates of Financial Responsibility under the Oil
Pollution Act of 1990.
    OMB Control Number: 1625-0046.
    Type of Request: Extension of a currently approved collection.
    Respondents: Vessel operators and approved insurers.
    Abstract: The information collection requirements described in this
supporting statement are necessary to provide evidence of a
respondent's ability to pay for removal costs and damages associated
with discharges or substantial threats of discharges of hazardous
material or oil into the navigable waters, adjoining shorelines or the
exclusive economic zone of the United States. The requirements are
imposed generally on operators and financial guarantors of vessels over
300 gross tons.
    Forms: CG-5585, CG-5586-1, -2, -3, -4.
    Burden Estimate: The estimated burden remains 3,400 hours a year.

    Dated: July 11, 2012.
R.E. Day,
Rear Admiral, U.S. Coast Guard, Assistant Commandant for Command,
Control, Communications, Computers and Information Technology.
[FR Doc. 2012-17408 Filed 7-17-12; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 9110-04-P


[Federal Register Volume 77, Number 30 (Tuesday, February 14, 2012)]
[Notices]
[Page 8249]
[FR Doc No: 2012-3383]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission

Combined Notice of Filings 2

    Take notice that the Commission received the following electric
rate filings:
    Docket Numbers: ER12-622-001.
    Applicants: PJM Interconnection, L.L.C., Virginia Electric and
Power Company.
    Description: Dominion submits Compliance Filing correcting Metadata
Section Title SA No. 3151 to be effective 1/1/2012.
    Filed Date: 2/7/12.
    Accession Number: 20120207-5083.
    Comments Due: 5 p.m. ET 2/28/12.

    Docket Numbers: ER12-995-000.
    Applicants: Cherokee County Cogeneration Partners, LLC.
    Description: Amendment to Market-Based Rate Application to be
effective 1/7/2012.
    Filed Date: 2/3/12.
    Accession Number: 20120203-5174.
    Comments Due: 5 p.m. ET 2/17/12.

    Docket Numbers: ER12-1012-000.
    Applicants: Midwest Independent Transmission System Operator, Inc.,
ITC Midwest LLC.
    Description: ITCM-ComEd CAIC agreement to be effective 2/8/2012.
    Filed Date: 2/7/12.
    Accession Number: 20120207-5032.
    Comments Due: 5 p.m. ET 2/28/12.

    Docket Numbers: ER12-1013-000.
    Applicants: Physical Systems Integration, LLC.
    Description: Physical Systems Integration, LLC--MBR Application to
be effective 3/1/2012.
    Filed Date: 2/7/12.
    Accession Number: 20120207-5033.
    Comments Due: 5 p.m. ET 2/28/12.

    Docket Numbers: ER12-1014-000.
    Applicants: PJM Interconnection, L.L.C.
    Description: PJM Original Service Agreement No. 3188; Queue No. W3-
135 to be effective 1/16/2012.
    Filed Date: 2/7/12.
    Accession Number: 20120207-5058.
    Comments Due: 5 p.m. ET 2/28/12.

    Docket Numbers: ER12-1016-000.
    Applicants: Appalachian Power Company.
    Description: 20120207 Attachment K and L Revision to be effective
3/2/2012.
    Filed Date: 2/7/12.
    Accession Number: 20120207-5082.
    Comments Due: 5 p.m. ET 2/28/12.

    The filings are accessible in the Commission's eLibrary system by
clicking on the links or querying the docket number.
    Any person desiring to intervene or protest in any of the above
proceedings must file in accordance with Rules 211 and 214 of the
Commission's Regulations (18 CFR 385.211 and 385.214) on or before 5:00
pm Eastern time on the specified comment date. Protests may be
considered, but intervention is necessary to become a party to the
proceeding.
    eFiling is encouraged. More detailed information relating to filing
requirements, interventions, protests, service, and qualifying
facilities filings can be found at: http://www.ferc.gov/docs-filing/efiling/filing-req.pdf. For other information, call<PHONE_NUMBER>
(toll free). For TTY, call<PHONE_NUMBER>.

    Dated: February 7, 2012.
Nathaniel J. Davis, Sr.,
Deputy Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2012-3383 Filed 2-13-12; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6717-01-P


owner/operator of the landfill gas treatment system must ensure
compliance with the treatment requirements. The owner/operator of a
combustion device who uses treated landfill gas as a fuel in a
combustion device or purchases treated landfill gas for fuel in a
combustion device shall be exempt from further compliance with this
subpart. The treated gas must be used as a fuel, and venting of treated
landfill gas to the ambient air or combustion in a flare is not allowed
under this option.
    (D) If an owner/operator complied with the requirements of
paragraph (b)(2)(iii) of this section by installing and operating a gas
treatment system on or before September 8, 2006, the owner/operator
must ensure that the treatment system meets the treatment system
definition in Sec.  60.751, submit a design plan update including the
information specified in paragraph (b)(2)(i)(D) of this section, meet
the requirements of paragraph (b)(2)(iii)(C) of this section, and
implement all treatment system operating, compliance, monitoring,
recordkeeping, and reporting requirements of this subpart as
expeditiously as practicable, but no later than [DATE 1 YEAR AFTER THE
FINAL RULE AMENDMENTS ARE PUBLISHED IN THE Federal Register].
Alternatively, the owner/operator may elect to comply with the control
requirements in paragraph (b)(2)(iii)(A) or paragraph (b)(2)(iii)(B) of
this section; submit a design plan update for the control system; and
comply with all control system operational, testing, compliance,
monitoring, recordkeeping, and reporting requirements of this subpart
as expeditiously as practicable, but no later than [DATE 1 YEAR AFTER
THE FINAL RULE AMENDMENTS ARE PUBLISHED IN THE Federal Register].
* * * * *
    9. Section 60.755 is amended by revising paragraph (c)(3) and
paragraph (e) to read as follows:

Sec.  60.755  Compliance provisions.

* * * * *
    (c) * * *
    (3) Surface emission monitoring shall be performed in accordance
with section 8.3.1 of Method 21 of appendix A of this part, except that
the probe inlet shall be placed within 5 to 10 centimeters of the
ground. Monitoring shall be performed during typical meteorological
conditions.
* * * * *
    (e) The provisions of the subpart apply at all times, except during
periods of startup, shutdown, and malfunction and periods of routine
maintenance of the landfill gas collection, control, or treatment
systems. The provisions of Sec.  60.11(d) continue to apply during
periods of startup, shutdown, malfunction, and routine maintenance of
the landfill gas collection, control, or treatment systems. Routine
maintenance activities must be completed and malfunctions must be
corrected as soon as practicable after their occurrence in order to
minimize emissions.
    10. Section 60.756 is amended by adding paragraph (g) to read as
follows:

Sec.  60.756  Monitoring of operations.

* * * * *
    (g) Each owner or operator seeking to demonstrate compliance with
Sec.  60.752(b)(2)(iii) using a landfill gas treatment system shall
calibrate, maintain, and operate according to the manufacturer's
specifications, the following equipment.
    (1) A device that monitors pressure drop across, or other approved
parameter(s) for, the filtration system that is equipped with a
continuous recorder that shall record such parameters at least once
every 15 minutes. Records of hourly and 24-hour block averages computed
from the continuous monitoring data must also be retained.
    (2) A device that monitors the landfill gas temperature for a
chiller-based de-watering system, the landfill gas dew point for a non-
chiller-based de-watering system, or the approved operating
parameter(s) for the de-watering system at the monitoring locations
specified in the approved design plan required under Sec.
60.752(b)(2)(i)(D). Each monitoring device must be equipped with a
continuous recorder that shall record such parameters at least once
every 15 minutes. Records of hourly and 24-hour block averages computed
from the continuous monitoring data must also be retained.
    (3) A device that records flow to or bypass of the treatment
system. The owner or operator shall either:
    (i) Install, calibrate, and maintain a gas flow rate measuring
device that shall record the flow to the control device at least every
15 minutes; or
    (ii) Secure the bypass line valve in the closed position with a
car-seal or a lock-and-key type configuration. A visual inspection of
the seal or closure mechanism shall be performed at least once every
month to ensure that the valve is maintained in the closed position and
that the gas flow is not diverted through the bypass line.
    11. Section 60.757 is amended by revising paragraphs (f)
introductory text and (f)(1) through (f)(3) to read as follows:

Sec.  60.757  Reporting requirements.

* * * * *
    (f) The owner or operator seeking to comply with Sec.  60.752(b)(2)
using an active collection system designed in accordance with Sec.
60.752(b)(2)(ii) shall submit to the Administrator annual reports of
the recorded information in paragraphs (f)(1) through (6) of this
section. The initial annual report shall be submitted within 180 days
of installation and start-up of the collection, control, or treatment
system, and shall include the initial performance test report required
under Sec.  60.8, as applicable. For enclosed combustion devices,
treatment systems, and flares, reportable exceedances are defined under
Sec.  60.758(c).
    (1) Value and length of time for exceedance of applicable
parameters monitored under Sec.  60.756(a), (b), (c), (d), and (g).
    (2) Description and duration of all periods when the gas stream is
diverted from the control device or treatment system through a bypass
line or the indication of a bypass flow as specified under Sec.
60.756.
    (3) Description and duration of all periods when the control device
or treatment system was not operating for a period exceeding 1 hour and
length of time the control device or treatment system was not
operating.
* * * * *
    12. Section 60.758 is amended by:
    a. Revising paragraph (b) introductory text, paragraph (b)(2)(i),
paragraph (c) introductory text; and paragraph (c)(1)(i); and
    b. Adding paragraph (b)(5), paragraph (c)(1)(iii); and paragraph
(g) to read as follows:

Sec.  60.758  Recordkeeping requirements.

* * * * *
    (b) Except as provided in Sec.  60.752(b)(2)(i)(B), for controlled
landfills, the owner or operator shall keep up-to-date, readily
accessible records for the life of the control equipment or treatment
system of the data listed in paragraphs (b)(1) through (5) of this
section as measured during the initial performance test or compliance
demonstration, or as submitted and approved under Sec.
60.752(b)(2)(i)(D). Records of subsequent tests or monitoring shall be
maintained for a minimum of 5 years. Records of the control device or
treatment system vendor specifications shall be maintained until
removal.
* * * * *
    (2) * * *

    (i) The average temperature measured at least every 15 minutes and
averaged over the same time period of the performance test.
* * * * *
    (5) Where an owner or operator subject to the provisions of this
subpart seeks to demonstrate compliance with Sec.  60.752(b)(2)(iii)
through the use of a treatment system:
    (i) The approved minimum pressure drop across the filtration
system, or the approved operating ranges for other monitoring
parameter(s) that indicate proper performance of the filtration system,
as specified in the approved design plan required by Sec.
60.752(b)(2)(i)(D).
    (ii) The approved minimum temperature reduction or approved maximum
outlet temperature of a chiller-based de-watering system, the approved
minimum dew point reduction or maximum outlet dew point of a non-
chiller-based de-watering system, or the approved operating ranges for
other monitoring parameter(s) that indicate proper performance of the
de-watering system, as specified in the approved design plan required
by Sec.  60.752(b)(2)(i)(D).
    (c) Except as provided in Sec.  60.752(b)(2)(i)(B), for a
controlled landfill subject to the provisions of this subpart, the
owner or operator shall keep for 5 years up-to-date, readily accessible
continuous records of the equipment operating parameters specified to
be monitored under Sec.  60.756 as well as up-to-date, readily
accessible records for periods of operation during which the parameter
boundaries measured during the most recent performance test or
submitted and approved under Sec.  60.752(b)(2)(i)(D) are exceeded.
    (1) * * *
    (i) For enclosed combustors, except for boilers and process heaters
with design heat input capacity of 44 megawatts (150 million British
thermal units (Btu) per hour) or greater, all 3-hour periods of
operation during which the average temperature was more than 28 [deg]C
below the average temperature during the most recent performance test
at which compliance with Sec.  60.752(b)(2)(iii) was determined.
* * * * *
    (iii) For treatment systems used to demonstrate compliance with
Sec.  60.752(b)(2)(iii), all 24-hour periods of operation during which
the average operating parameter values are outside of the approved
ranges identified in Sec.  60.752(b)(2)(i)(D) as those that indicate
proper performance of the treatment system.
* * * * *
    (g) Where multiple entities exist under the definitions of
``Municipal solid waste landfill owner/operator'' and ``Municipal solid
waste landfill gas collection, control, or treatment system owner/
operator'' for an individual MSW landfill and its required gas
collection, control, or treatment systems, all entities must keep a
list that shows regulatory section and paragraph numbers, documenting
which aspects of the requirements of Sec. Sec.  60.752 through 60.759
each party will comply with. The list must include all requirements of
this subpart that apply to the MSW landfill and all required gas
collection, control, or treatment systems. If the list does not
correctly identify all applicable provisions, all entities involved are
responsible for compliance with the missing items. All entities must
keep an identical copy of the list on site and must comply with those
provisions on the applicable list that are assigned to them until such
time as the list may be modified. The list must be kept up-to-date. The
current list and all previously modified lists must be maintained on
site for 5 years after the date each list was modified. If a gas
collection, control, or treatment system was installed to comply with
this subpart on or before September 8, 2006, the list showing the
requirements that each party will comply with must be completed as
expeditiously as practicable, but no later than [DATE 1 YEAR AFTER THE
FINAL RULE AMENDMENTS ARE PUBLISHED IN THE Federal Register]. Entities
meeting the definition of ``Municipal solid waste landfill owner/
operator'' or ``Municipal solid waste landfill gas collection, control,
or treatment system owner/operator'' may be held responsible for
compliance with this subpart as specified in Sec.  60.750(a)(1) and
(2).

PART 62--[AMENDED]

    13. The authority citation for part 62 continues to read as
follows:

    Authority: 42 U.S.C. 7401, et seq.

Subpart GGG--[Amended]

    14. Section 62.14351 is amended by adding the definitions of
``Municipal solid waste landfill gas collection, control, or treatment
system owner/operator'' and ``Municipal solid waste landfill owner/
operator'' in alphabetical order to read as follows:

Sec.  62.14351  Definitions

* * * * *
    Municipal solid waste landfill gas collection, control, or
treatment system owner/operator means any entity that owns or operates
any stationary equipment required by Sec.  62.14353 that is used to
collect, control, or treat landfill gas from an MSW landfill that is a
designated facility under Sec.  62.14352(a), regardless of the location
of the control or treatment system.
    Municipal solid waste landfill owner/operator means any entity that
owns or operates a municipal solid waste landfill that is a designated
facility under Sec.  62.14352(a).
* * * * *
    15. Section 62.14352 is amended by: a. Revising paragraph (a)
introductory text; and
    b. Adding paragraph (g) to read as follows:

Sec.  62.14352  Designated facilities.

    (a) The designated facility to which this subpart applies is each
existing MSW landfill, and the stationary equipment used to collect,
control, or treat the landfill gas from such MSW landfills as required
by Sec.  62.14353 of this subpart, in all States, protectorates, and
Indian Country that meets the conditions of paragraphs (a)(1) and (2)
of this section, except for landfills exempted by paragraphs (b) and
(c) of this section.
* * * * *
    (g) Each MSW landfill owner/operator and each MSW landfill gas
collection, control, or treatment system owner/operator, as defined in
Sec.  62.14351, is responsible for compliance as specified in
paragraphs (g)(1) and (2) of this section; provided, however, that if
the MSW landfill and the associated gas collection, control, and/or
treatment system are under common control, the entity exercising such
control shall be responsible for complying with the requirements in
both paragraphs (g)(1) and (2) of this section.
    (1) Municipal solid waste landfill owners/operators are responsible
for complying with the requirements of this subpart for the landfill
and any portion of the landfill gas collection, control, or treatment
system they own/operate. In addition, if another entity owns/operates
the gas collection, control, or treatment system and for any reason
(e.g., bankruptcy, abandonment of operation) that entity ceases to
accept the landfill gas, responsibility for complying with all
applicable requirements to which that entity was subject under this
subpart shall immediately apply to, and be binding on, the landfill
owner/operator. The title V permits for landfill owners/operators

must be written to require that the requirements applicable to the
owners/operators of the landfill gas collection, control, and/or
treatment system immediately become applicable requirements of the
landfill owner/operator whenever the owners/operators of the landfill
gas collection, control, and/or treatment system cease to accept the
landfill gas.
    (2) Municipal solid waste landfill gas collection, control, or
treatment system owners/operator are responsible for complying with the
requirements of this subpart for the portion of the landfill gas
collection, control, or treatment system they own/operate.

PART 63--[AMENDED]

    16. The authority citation for part 63 continues to read as
follows:

    Authority: 42 U.S.C. 7401, et seq.

Subpart AAAA--[Amended]

    17. Section 63.1935 is amended by adding paragraphs (c) and (d) to
read as follows:

Sec.  63.1935  Am I subject to this subpart?

* * * * *
    (c) You are subject to this subpart if you own or operate
stationary equipment required by Sec.  63.1947 or Sec.  63.1955 that is
used to collect, control, or treat landfill gas from a municipal solid
waste landfill that is subject to this subpart (regardless of the
location of the control or treatment system).
    (d) Each municipal solid waste landfill owner/operator and each
municipal solid waste landfill gas collection, control, or treatment
system owner/operator, as defined in Sec.  63.1990, is responsible for
compliance with this subpart as specified in paragraphs (d)(1) and (2)
of this section; provided, however, that if the municipal solid waste
landfill and the associated gas collection, control, and/or treatment
system are under common control, the entity exercising such control
shall be responsible for complying with the requirements in both
paragraphs (d)(1) and (2) of this section.
    (1) Municipal solid waste landfill owners/operators are responsible
for complying with the requirements of this subpart for the landfill
and any portion of the landfill gas collection, control, or treatment
system they own/operate. In addition, if another entity owns/operates
the gas collection, control, or treatment system and for any reason
(e.g., bankruptcy, abandonment of operation) that entity ceases to
accept the landfill gas, responsibility for complying with all
applicable requirements to which that entity was subject under this
subpart shall immediately apply to, and be binding on, the landfill
owner/operator. The title V permits for landfill owners/operators must
be written to require that the requirements applicable to the owners/
operators of the landfill gas collection, control, and/or treatment
system immediately become applicable requirements of the landfill
owner/operator whenever the owners/operators of the landfill gas
collection, control, and/or treatment system cease to accept the
landfill gas.
    (2) Municipal solid waste landfill gas collection, control, or
treatment system owners/operators are responsible for complying with
the requirements of this subpart for the portion of the landfill gas
collection, control, or treatment system they own/operate.
    18. Section Sec.  63.1940 is amended by revising paragraph (a) to
read as follows:

Sec.  63.1940  What is the affected source of this subpart?

    (a) An affected source of this subpart is a MSW landfill, as
defined in Sec.  63.1990, that meets the criteria in Sec.  63.1935(a)
or Sec.  63.1935 (b). The affected source includes the entire disposal
facility in a contiguous geographic space where household waste is
placed in or on land, including any portion of the MSW landfill
operated as a bioreactor. The affected source also includes stationary
equipment required by Sec.  63.1947 or Sec.  63.1955 that is used to
collect, control, or treat landfill gas from a MSW landfill that is
subject to this subpart (regardless of the location of the control or
treatment system).
* * * * *
    19. Section 63.1945 is amended by revising paragraph (d) to read as
follows:

Sec.  63.1945  When do I have to comply with this subpart?

* * * * *
    (d) If your landfill is an existing affected source and is a major
source or is collocated with a major source, you must comply with the
requirements in Sec.  63.1955(b) and Sec. Sec.  63.1960 through 63.1980
by the date your landfill is required to install a collection and
control system by 40 CFR 60.752(b)(2) of subpart WWW, the Federal plan,
or EPA approved and effective State or tribal plan that applies to your
landfill or by January 16, 2004, whichever occurs later.
* * * * *
    20. Section 63.1955 is amended by revising paragraph (c) to read as
follows:

Sec.  63.1955  What requirements must I meet?

* * * * *
    (c) For approval of collection and control systems that include any
alternatives to the operational standards, test methods, procedures,
compliance measures, monitoring, recordkeeping, or reporting
provisions, you must follow the procedures in 40 CFR 60.752(b)(2) of
subpart http://WWW. If alternatives have already been approved under 40 CFR

part 60, subpart WWW, or the Federal plan, or EPA-approved and
effective State or tribal plan, those alternatives can be used to
comply with this subpart, except that all affected sources must comply
with the startup, shutdown, and malfunction requirements in subpart A
of this part as specified in Table 1 of this subpart; and all affected
sources must submit compliance reports every 6 months as specified in
Sec.  63.1980(a) and (b), including information on all deviations that
occurred during the 6-month reporting period. Deviations for continuous
emission monitors or numerical continuous parameter monitors must be
determined using a 3-hour monitoring block average for control systems
used to demonstrate compliance with 40 CFR 60.752(b)(iii)(B) of subpart
WWW, or a 24-hour monitoring block average for treatment systems used
to demonstrate compliance with 40 CFR 60.752(b)(iii)(C) of subpart http://WWW.

* * * * *
    21. Section 63.1960 is revised to read as follows:

Sec.  63.1960  How is compliance determined?

    Compliance is determined in the same way it is determined for 40
CFR part 60, subpart WWW, including performance testing, monitoring of
the collection system, continuous parameter monitoring, and other
credible evidence. In addition, continuous parameter monitoring data,
collected under 40 CFR 60.756(b)(1), (c)(1), (d) and (g) of subpart
WWW, are used to demonstrate compliance with the operating conditions
for control systems or treatment systems. If a deviation occurs, you
have failed to meet the control device or treatment system operating
conditions described in this subpart and have deviated from the
requirements of this subpart. Finally, you must develop a written SSM
plan according to the provisions in Sec.  63.6(e)(3). Your SSM plan
must include a plan for conducting routine maintenance on the landfill
gas collection, control, and treatment systems. The routine maintenance
plan must include maintenance procedures, actions that will be taken to
minimize

emissions during maintenance, shutdown frequency, shutdown duration,
and procedures for minimizing emissions during startup and shutdown of
the collection, control, and/or treatment systems for routine
maintenance. A copy of the SSM plan must be maintained on site. Failure
to write or maintain a copy of the SSM plan is a deviation from the
requirements of this subpart.
    22. Section 63.1965 is amended by revising paragraphs (a) and (b)
to read as follows:

Sec.  63.1965  What is a deviation?

* * * * *
    (a) A deviation occurs when the control device or treatment system
operating parameter boundaries described in 40 CFR 60.758(c)(1) of
subpart WWW are exceeded.
    (b) A deviation occurs when 1 hour or more of the hours during the
applicable 3-hour, or 24-hour, block averaging period specified in 40
CFR 60.758(c)(1) of subpart WWW does not constitute a valid hour of
data. A valid hour of data must have measured values for at least three
15-minute monitoring periods within the hour.
* * * * *
    23. Section 63.1975 is revised to read as follows:

Sec.  63.1975  How do I calculate the block average used to demonstrate
compliance?

    Averages are calculated in the same way as they are calculated in
40 CFR part 60, subpart WWW, except that averages computed under this
subpart shall not include periods of monitoring system breakdowns,
repairs, calibration checks, and zero (low-level) and high-level
adjustments.
    24. Section 63.1980 is amended by adding paragraphs (i) and (j) to
read as follows:

Sec.  63.1980  What records and reports must I keep and submit?

* * * * *
    (i) In lieu of meeting the requirements of Sec.  63.10(d)(5)(i) and
(ii) of subpart A for periodic and immediate startup, shutdown, and
malfunction reports, you must comply with the requirements of
paragraphs (i)(1) and (2) of this section.
    (1) Periodic startup, shutdown, and malfunction reports. The owner
or operator shall report each startup, shutdown, and malfunction
(including startups and shutdowns of the landfill gas collection,
control, or treatment system for routine maintenance) that occurred
during the semiannual compliance reporting period. Such report shall
include the date, duration, and identification of each startup,
shutdown, and malfunction event (including startups and shutdowns of
the landfill gas collection, control, or treatment system for routine
maintenance) and any actions taken that were inconsistent with the SSM
plan. In any instance where any action taken by an owner or operator
during a startup, shutdown, or malfunction (including actions taken to
correct a malfunction and actions taken during startup or shutdown of
the landfill gas collection, control, or treatment system for routine
maintenance) is not consistent with the affected source's SSM plan, the
report also shall include a brief description of the startup, shutdown,
or malfunction event. Reports shall be required only if a startup,
shutdown, or malfunction (including startups or shutdowns of the
landfill gas collection, control, or treatment system for routine
maintenance) occurred during the reporting period. The startup,
shutdown, and malfunction report shall consist of a letter, containing
the name, title, and signature of the owner or operator or other
responsible official who is certifying its accuracy, that shall be
submitted to the Administrator every 6 months with the reports
described in paragraph (a) or paragraph (c) through (f) of this
section.
    (2) Immediate startup, shutdown, and malfunction reports. Any time
an action taken by an owner or operator during a startup, shutdown, or
malfunction (including actions taken to correct a malfunction and
actions taken during startup or shutdown of the landfill gas
collection, control, or treatment system for routine maintenance) is
not consistent with the procedures specified in the affected source's
SSM plan, the owner or operator shall report the actions taken for that
event within 2 working days after commencing actions inconsistent with
the plan followed by a letter within 7 working days after the end of
the event. If the duration of any shutdown or malfunction event
(including any shutdown of the landfill gas collection, control, or
treatment system for routine maintenance) exceeds 5 days, the owner or
operator shall report the event within 2 working days of the date the
duration of the event exceeds 5 days, followed up by a letter within 7
working days after the end of the event. The immediate reports required
under this paragraph (i)(2) shall consist of a telephone call (or
facsimile (fax) transmission) to the Administrator within 2 working
days, and it shall be followed by a letter, delivered or postmarked
within 7 working days after the end of the event, that contains the
name, title, and signature of the owner or operator or other
responsible official who is certifying its accuracy, explaining the
circumstances of the event and the reasons for not following the SSM
plan. If the duration of any shutdown or malfunction event (including
any shutdown of the landfill gas collection, control, or treatment
system for routine maintenance) exceeds 5 days, the immediate report
shall also include the reasons that the duration of the event exceeded
5 days and actions taken to minimize the duration of the event.
Notwithstanding the requirements of the previous sentences in this
paragraph (i)(2), after the effective date of an approved permit
program in the State in which an affected source is located, the owner
or operator may make alternative reporting arrangements, in advance,
with the permitting authority in that State. Procedures governing the
arrangement of alternative reporting requirements under this paragraph
(i)(2) are specified in Sec.  63.9(i) of subpart A.
    (j) Where multiple entities exist under the definitions of
``Municipal solid waste landfill owner/operator'' and ``Municipal solid
waste landfill gas collection, control, or treatment system owner/
operator'' for an individual MSW landfill and its required gas
collection, control, or treatment systems, all entities must keep a
list that shows regulatory section and paragraph numbers, documenting
which aspects of the requirements of Sec. Sec.  63.1945 through 63.1980
each entity will comply with. The list must include all requirements of
this subpart that apply to the MSW landfill and all required gas
collection, control, or treatment systems. If the list does not
correctly identify all applicable provisions, all entities involved are
responsible for compliance with the missing requirements. All entities
must keep an identical copy of the list on site and must comply with
those provisions on the applicable list that are assigned to them until
such time as the list may be modified. The list must be kept up-to-
date. The current list and all previously modified lists must be
maintained on site for 5 years after the date each list was modified.
If a gas collection, control, or treatment system was installed to
comply with this subpart on or before September 8, 2006, the list
showing the requirements that each party will comply with must be
completed no later than [DATE 1 YEAR AFTER THE FINAL RULE AMENDMENTS
ARE PUBLISHED IN THE Federal Register]. Entities meeting the definition
of ``Municipal solid waste landfill owner/operator'' or ``Municipal
solid waste landfill gas collection,

control, or treatment system owner/operator'' may be held responsible
for compliance with this subpart as specified in Sec.  63.1935(d)(1)
and (2).
    25. Section 63.1990 is amended by revising the definition of
``Bioreactor'' and adding a definition of ``Municipal solid waste
landfill gas collection, control, or treatment system owner/operator''
in alphabetical order to read as follows:

Sec.  63.1990  What definitions apply to this subpart?

    Bioreactor means an MSW landfill or portion of a municipal solid
waste landfill where any liquid other than leachate (leachate includes
landfill gas condensate) is added in a controlled fashion into the
waste mass (often in combination with recirculating leachate) to reach
a minimum average moisture content of at least 40 percent by weight,
calculated on a wet weight basis, to accelerate or enhance the
anaerobic (without oxygen) biodegradation of the waste.
* * * * *
    Municipal solid waste landfill gas collection, control, or
treatment system owner/operator means any entity that owns or operates
any stationary equipment required by 40 CFR 60.752(b)(2) of subpart WWW
or Sec.  63.1947 or Sec.  63.1955 that is used to collect, control, or
treat landfill gas from a municipal solid waste landfill that is
subject to this subpart (regardless of the location of the control or
treatment system).
* * * * *
    26. Table 1 to subpart AAAA of part 63 is amended by:
    a. Revising the entry for Sec.  63.6(e).
    b. Adding a new entry in numerical order for Sec.  63.9(i).
    c. Removing the entry for Sec.  63.10(d)(5) to read as follows:

  Table 1 to Subpart AAAA of Part 63.--Applicability of NESHAP General
                       Provisions to Subpart AAAA
------------------------------------------------------------------------
      Part 63 citation             Description           Explanation
------------------------------------------------------------------------

                              * * * * * * *
Sec.   63.6(e), except Sec.   Operation and         Affected sources are
  63.6(e)(3)(iv).              maintenance           subject to the
                               requirements, SSM     provisions in Sec.
                               plan provisions.       63.1980(i)(2)
                                                     instead of Sec.
                                                     63.6(e)(3)(iv).

                              * * * * * * *
Sec.   63.9(i)..............  Provisions to adjust  Allows adjustment of
                               the time periods      timing of reports.
                               for postmark
                               deadlines for
                               submitting required
                               reports.
------------------------------------------------------------------------

[FR Doc. 06-7493 Filed 9-7-06; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 6560-50-P


§ 308( e)

* * * *

( 3) A State which opts under 40 CFR 51.308( e)( 2) to implement an emissions trading program or other alternative measure rather than to require sources subject to BART to install, operate, and maintain BART may satisfy the final step of the demonstration required by that section by conducting dispersion modeling to determine the visibility impact of the trading alternative. The dispersion modeling should determine differences in visibility between BART and the trading program for each impacted Class I area, for the worst and best 20 percent of days. The modeling should identify the estimated difference from future baseline visibility conditions under the two approaches for each Class I area, and the average difference in visibility over all Class I areas impacted by the region's emissions. The modeling would demonstrate " greater reasonable progress" if both of the following two criteria are met:  visibility does not decline in any Class I area, and  there is an overall improvement in visibility, determined by comparing the average differences over all affected Class I areas.

( 4) A State that opts to participate in the Clean Air Interstate Rule cap and trade and trade program under part 96 AAA   EEE need not require affected BART eligible EGU's to install, operate, and maintain BART. A State that chooses this option may also include provisions for a geographic enhancement to the program to address the requirement under § 51.302( c) related to BART for reasonably attributable impairment from the pollutants covered by the CAIR cap and trade program.

( 5) After a State has met the requirements for BART or implemented emissions trading program or other alternative measure that achieves more reasonable progress than the installation and operation of BART, BART eligible sources will be subject to the requirements of § 51.308( d) in the same manner as other sources.

( 6) Any BART eligible facility subject to the requirement under § 51.308( e) to install, operate, and maintain BART may apply to the Administrator for an exemption from that requirement. An application for an exemption will be subject to the requirements of § 51.303( a)( 2)   ( h).


[Federal Register Volume 79, Number 90 (Friday, May 9, 2014)]
[Notices]
[Pages 26752-26753]
[FR Doc No: 2014-10691]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY

[FRL-9910-61-OGC]

Proposed Consent Decree, Clean Air Act Citizen Suit

AGENCY: Environmental Protection Agency (EPA).

ACTION: Notice of proposed consent decree; request for public comment.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: In accordance with section 113(g) of the Clean Air Act, as
amended (``CAA''), notice is hereby given of a proposed partial consent
decree to address lawsuits filed by the States of New York,
Connecticut, Maryland, Oregon, Rhode Island, and Vermont; the
Commonwealth of Massachusetts; and Puget Sound Clean Air Agency
(collectively ``State Plaintiffs''); the American Lung Association,
Environmental Defense Fund, Clean Air Council and Environment and Human
Health, Inc. (collectively ``Environmental Plaintiffs''); and
interveners the Hearth, Patio & Barbecue Association (``Association
Plaintiff'') in the United States District Court for the District of
Columbia: State of New York, et al. v. McCarthy, No. 13-1553 and
consolidated case No. 13-1555 (D. D.C). Plaintiffs each filed a
complaint alleging that EPA failed to perform a nondiscretionary duty
to review, and, if necessary, revise the new performance standards for
new residential wood heaters, at least every eight years. The consent
decree would require EPA to sign a notice to take final action by
February 3, 2015.

DATES: Written comments on the proposed consent decree must be received
by June 9, 2014.

ADDRESSES: Submit your comments, identified by Docket ID number EPA-HQ-
OGC-2014-0363, online at www.regulations.gov (EPA's preferred method);
by email to<EMAIL_ADDRESS>mailed to EPA Docket Center,
Environmental Protection Agency, Mailcode: 2822T, 1200 Pennsylvania
Ave. NW., Washington, DC 20460-0001; or by hand delivery or courier to
EPA Docket Center, EPA West, Room 3334, 1301 Constitution Ave. NW.,
Washington, DC, between 8:30 a.m. and 4:30 p.m. Monday through Friday,
excluding legal holidays. Comments on a disk or CD-ROM should be
formatted in Word or ASCII file, avoiding the use of special characters
and any form of encryption, and may be mailed to the mailing address
above.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Scott Jordan, Air and Radiation Law
Office (2344A), Office of General Counsel, U.S. Environmental
Protection Agency, 1200 Pennsylvania Ave. NW., Washington, DC 20460;
telephone:<PHONE_NUMBER>; fax number<PHONE_NUMBER>; email address:
<EMAIL_ADDRESS>
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

I. Additional Information About the Proposed Consent Decree

    The proposed consent decree would settle claims by the State and
Environmental Plaintiffs in deadline suits alleging that EPA failed to
perform a nondiscretionary duty pursuant to section 111(b)(1)(B) of the
Act, 42 U.S.C. 7411(b)(1)(B) to review, and, if necessary, revise, the
new source performance standards for new residential wood heaters at
least once every eight years. The Association Plaintiff has not agreed
to settle its claims against EPA and does not join in this Consent
Decree. The proposed consent decree would require EPA, by February 3,
2015, to sign a Federal Register notice taking final action with
respect to the Wood Heater NSPS Standards, 40 CFR part 60, Subpart AAA,
with such modifications as EPA deems appropriate under CAA section
111(b)(1)(B), 42 U.S.C. 7411(b)(l)(B). Under the proposed consent
decree, once EPA has met its obligations, and the parties have resolved
any claims for litigation costs, the State and Environmental Plaintiffs
and EPA agree that this consent decree shall constitute a complete and
final settlement of all claims that the State and Environmental
Plaintiffs asserted against EPA, in State of New York, et al. v. EPA,
Case No. 1:13-cv-1553-GK (and consolidated case).
    For a period of thirty (30) days following the date of publication
of this notice, the Agency will receive written comments relating to
the proposed consent decree from persons who were not named as parties
or intervenors to the litigation in question. EPA or the Department of
Justice may withdraw or withhold consent to the proposed consent decree
if the comments disclose facts or considerations that indicate that
such consent is inappropriate, improper, inadequate, or inconsistent
with the requirements of the Act. Unless EPA or the Department of
Justice determines that consent to the consent decree should be
withdrawn, the terms of the decree will be affirmed.

II. Additional Information About Commenting on the Proposed Consent
Decree

A. How can I get a copy of the consent decree?

    Direct your comments to the official public docket for this action
under Docket ID No. EPA-HQ-OGC-2014-0363 which contains a copy of the
consent decree. The official public docket is available for public
viewing at the Office of Environmental Information (OEI) Docket in the
EPA Docket Center, EPA West, Room 3334, 1301 Constitution Ave. NW.,
Washington, DC. The EPA Docket Center Public Reading Room is open from
8:30 a.m. to 4:30 p.m., Monday through Friday, excluding legal
holidays. The telephone number for the Public Reading Room is (202)
566-1744, and the telephone number for the OEI Docket is (202) 566-
1752.
    An electronic version of the public docket is available through
www.regulations.gov. You may use the www.regulations.gov to submit or
view

public comments, access the index listing of the contents of the
official public docket, and to access those documents in the public
docket that are available electronically. Once in the system, key in
the appropriate docket identification number then select ``search''.
    It is important to note that EPA's policy is that public comments,
whether submitted electronically or in paper, will be made available
for public viewing online at www.regulations.gov without change, unless
the comment contains copyrighted material, CBI, or other information
whose disclosure is restricted by statute. Information claimed as CBI
and other information whose disclosure is restricted by statute is not
included in the official public docket or in the electronic public
docket. EPA's policy is that copyrighted material, including
copyrighted material contained in a public comment, will not be placed
in EPA's electronic public docket but will be available only in
printed, paper form in the official public docket. Although not all
docket materials may be available electronically, you may still access
any of the publicly available docket materials through the EPA Docket
Center.

B. How and to whom do I submit comments?

    You may submit comments as provided in the ADDRESSES section.
Please ensure that your comments are submitted within the specified
comment period. Comments received after the close of the comment period
will be marked ``late.'' EPA is not required to consider these late
comments.
    If you submit an electronic comment, EPA recommends that you
include your name, mailing address, and an email address or other
contact information in the body of your comment and with any disk or
CD-ROM you submit. This ensures that you can be identified as the
submitter of the comment and allows EPA to contact you in case EPA
cannot read your comment due to technical difficulties or needs further
information on the substance of your comment. Any identifying or
contact information provided in the body of a comment will be included
as part of the comment that is placed in the official public docket,
and made available in EPA's electronic public docket. If EPA cannot
read your comment due to technical difficulties and cannot contact you
for clarification, EPA may not be able to consider your comment.
    Use of the www.regulations.gov Web site to submit comments to EPA
electronically is EPA's preferred method for receiving comments. The
electronic public docket system is an ``anonymous access'' system,
which means EPA will not know your identity, email address, or other
contact information unless you provide it in the body of your comment.
In contrast to EPA's electronic public docket, EPA's electronic mail
(email) system is not an ``anonymous access'' system. If you send an
email comment directly to the Docket without going through
www.regulations.gov, your email address is automatically captured and
included as part of the comment that is placed in the official public
docket, and made available in EPA's electronic public docket.

    Dated: April 30, 2014.
Lorie J. Schmidt,
Associate General Counsel.
[FR Doc. 2014-10691 Filed 5-8-14; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6560-50-P


[Federal Register: August 5, 2010 (Volume 75, Number 150)]
[Notices]
[Page 47296]
[DOCID:fr05au10-63]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission

Combined Notice of Filings

July 30, 2010.
    Take notice that the Commission has received the following Natural
Gas Pipeline Rate and Refund Report filings:

    Docket Numbers: RP10-1012-000.
    Applicants: Transcontinental Gas Pipe Line Company, LLC.
    Description: Transcontinental Gas Pipe Line Company, LLC submits
tariff filing per 154.204: Update List of Non-Conforming Service
Agreements to be effective 8/29/2010.
    Filed Date: 07/29/2010.
    Accession Number: 20100729-5058.
    Comment Date: 5 p.m. Eastern Time on Tuesday, August 10, 2010.

    Docket Numbers: RP10-1013-000.
    Applicants: Mississippi Canyon Gas Pipeline, L.L.C.
    Description: Mississippi Canyon Gas Pipeline, L.L.C. submits tariff
filing per 154.203: MCGP Baseline Filing to be effective 8/31/2010.
    Filed Date: 07/29/2010.
    Accession Number: 20100729-5084.
    Comment Date: 5 p.m. Eastern Time on Tuesday, August 10, 2010.

    Docket Numbers: RP10-1014-000.
    Applicants: CenterPoint Energy Gas Transmission Company.
    Description: CenterPoint Energy Gas Transmission Company submits
tariff filing per 154.203: Sheet 579 (778) Compliance Filing to be
effective 8/6/2010.
    Filed Date: 07/30/2010.
    Accession Number: 20100730-5000.
    Comment Date: 5 p.m. Eastern Time on Wednesday, August 11, 2010.

    Docket Numbers: RP10-1015-000.
    Applicants: Alliance Pipeline L.P.
    Description: Alliance Pipeline L.P. submits Fourth Revised Sheet No
11 to FERC Gas Tariff, Volume 1, to be effective 8/1/2010.
    Filed Date: 07/30/2010.
    Accession Number: 20100730-5001.
    Comment Date: 5 p.m. Eastern Time on Wednesday, August 11, 2010.

    Docket Numbers: RP10-1016-000.
    Applicants: Midwestern Gas Transmission Company.
    Description: Midwestern Gas Transmission Company submits tariff
filing per 154.203: Non-Conforming Agreement--EDF to be effective 7/1/
2010.
    Filed Date: 07/30/2010.
    Accession Number: 20100730-5025.
    Comment Date: 5 p.m. Eastern Time on Wednesday, August 11, 2010.

    Docket Numbers: RP10-1017-000.
    Applicants: Florida Gas Transmission Company, LLC.
    Description: Florida Gas Transmission Company, LLC submits tariff
filing per 154.203: Baseline Filing to be effective 7/30/2010.
    Filed Date: 07/30/2010.
    Accession Number: 20100730-5032.
    Comment Date: 5 p.m. Eastern Time on Wednesday, August 11, 2010.

    Docket Numbers: RP10-1018-000.
    Applicants: Paiute Pipeline Company.
    Description: Paiute Pipeline Company submits tariff filing per
154.203: Baseline to be effective 7/9/2010.
    Filed Date: 07/30/2010.
    Accession Number: 20100730-5040.
    Comment Date: 5 p.m. Eastern Time on Wednesday, August 11, 2010.

    Docket Numbers: RP10-1019-000.
    Applicants: Dominion Transmission, Inc.
    Description: Dominion Transmission, Inc. submits tariff filing per
154.601: DTI--Volume No. 2 Contract Amendment to be effective 8/30/
2010.
    Filed Date: 07/30/2010.
    Accession Number: 20100730-5050.
    Comment Date: 5 p.m. Eastern Time on Wednesday, August 11, 2010.

    Docket Numbers: RP10-1020-000.
    Applicants: Great Lakes Gas Transmission Limited Partnership.
    Description: Great Lakes Gas Transmission Limited Partnership Semi-
Annual Transporter's Use Report.
    Filed Date: 07/30/2010.
    Accession Number: 20100730-5068.
    Comment Date: 5 p.m. Eastern Time on Wednesday, August 11, 2010.

    Docket Numbers: RP10-1021-000.
    Applicants: Columbia Gas Transmission, LLC.
    Description: Columbia Gas Transmission, LLC submits tariff filing
per 154.204: Gathering Affiliates to be effective 8/1/2010.
    Filed Date: 07/30/2010.
    Accession Number: 20100730-5069.
    Comment Date: 5 p.m. Eastern Time on Wednesday, August 11, 2010.

    Any person desiring to intervene or to protest in any of the above
proceedings must file in accordance with Rules 211 and 214 of the
Commission's Rules of Practice and Procedure (18 CFR 385.211 and
385.214) on or before 5 p.m. Eastern Time on the specified comment
date. It is not necessary to separately intervene again in a subdocket
related to a compliance filing if you have previously intervened in the
same docket. Protests will be considered by the Commission in
determining the appropriate action to be taken, but will not serve to
make protestants parties to the proceeding. Anyone filing a motion to
intervene or protest must serve a copy of that document on the
Applicant. In reference to filings initiating a new proceeding,
interventions or protests submitted on or before the comment deadline
need not be served on persons other than the Applicant.
    The Commission encourages electronic submission of protests and
interventions in lieu of paper, using the FERC Online links at http://
www.ferc.gov. To facilitate electronic service, persons with Internet
access who will eFile a document and/or be listed as a contact for an
intervenor must create and validate an eRegistration account using the
eRegistration link. Select the eFiling link to log on and submit the
intervention or protests.
    Persons unable to file electronically should submit an original and
14 copies of the intervention or protest to the Federal Energy
Regulatory Commission, 888 First St., NE., Washington, DC 20426.
    The filings in the above proceedings are accessible in the
Commission's eLibrary system by clicking on the appropriate link in the
above list. They are also available for review in the Commission's
Public Reference Room in Washington, DC. There is an eSubscription link
on the Web site that enables subscribers to receive e-mail notification
when a document is added to a subscribed docket(s). For assistance with
any FERC Online service, please e-mail<EMAIL_ADDRESS>or
call<PHONE_NUMBER> (toll free). For TTY, call<PHONE_NUMBER>.

Nathaniel J. Davis, Sr.,
Deputy Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2010-19233 Filed 8-4-10; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6717-01-P


[Federal Register: December 3, 2007 (Volume 72, Number 231)]
[Notices]
[Page 67994-67995]
[DOCID:fr03de07-129]

=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION

Federal Aviation Administration

Random Drug and Alcohol Testing Percentage Rates of Covered
Aviation Employees for the Period of January 1, 2008 Through December
31, 2008

AGENCY: Federal Aviation Administration (FAA), DOT.

ACTION: Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The FAA has determined that the minimum random drug and
alcohol testing percentage rates for the period January 1, 2008 through
December 31, 2008 will remain at 25 percent of safety-sensitive
employees for random drug testing and 10 percent of safety-sensitive
employees for random alcohol testing.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Mr. Jeffrey Stookey, Office of
Aerospace Medicine, Drug Abatement Division, Program Administration
Branch (AAM-810), Federal Aviation Administration, 800 Independence
Avenue, SW., Washington, DC 20591; telephone<PHONE_NUMBER>.
    Discussion: Pursuant to 14 CFR part 121, appendix I, section V.C,
the FAA Administrator's decision on whether to change the minimum
annual random drug testing rate is based on the reported random drug
test positive rate for the entire aviation industry. If the reported
random drug test positive rate is less than 1.00%, the Administrator
may continue the minimum random drug testing rate at 25%. In 2006, the
random drug test positive rate was 0.55%. Therefore, the minimum random
drug testing rate will remain at 25% for calendar year 2008.
    Similarly, 14 CFR part 121, appendix J, section III.C, requires the
decision on

the minimum annual random alcohol testing rate to be based on the
random alcohol test violation rate. If the violation rate remains less
than 0.50%, the Administrator may continue the minimum random alcohol
testing rate at 10%. In 2006, the random alcohol test violation rate
was 0.08%. Therefore, the minimum random alcohol testing rate will
remain at 10% for calendar year 2008.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: If you have questions about how the annual
random testing percentage rates are determined, please refer to the
Code of Federal Regulations Title 14: part 121, appendix I, section V.C
(for drug testing), and appendix J, section III.C (for alcohol
testing).

    Issued in Washington, DC, on November 26, 2007.
Frederick E. Tilton,
Federal Air Surgeon.
[FR Doc. 07-5900 Filed 11-30-07; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4910-13-M


[Federal Register: November 30, 2005 (Volume 70, Number 229)]
[Notices]
[Page 71820-71821]
[DOCID:fr30no05-46]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission

[Docket No. RP06-100-000]

Transcontinental Gas Pipe Line Corporation; Notice of Proposed
Changes in FERC Gas Tariff

November 22, 2005.
    Take notice that on November 17, 2005, Transcontinental Gas Pipe
Line Corporation (Transco) tendered for filing as part of its FERC Gas
Tariff, Third Revised Volume No. 1, First Revised Fifty-Ninth Revised
Sheet No. 50 and Substitute Sixtieth Revised Sheet No. 50, to become
effective November 1, 2005 and November 15, 2005, respectively.
    Transco states that the purpose of the instant filing is to track
fuel percentage changes attributable to transportation service
purchased from Texas Gas Transmission, LLC (Texas Gas) under its Rate
Schedule FT, the costs of which are included in the rates and charges
payable under Transco's Rate Schedule FT-NT. This filing is being made
pursuant to tracking provisions under Section 4 of Transco's Rate
Schedule FT-NT.
    Transco states that included in Appendix B attached to the filing
is the explanation of the fuel percentage changes and details regarding
the computation of the revised FT-NT rates.
    Transco states that copies of the filing are being mailed to each
of its FT-NT customers and interested State Commissions.
    Any person desiring to intervene or to protest this filing must
file in accordance with Rules 211 and 214 of the Commission's Rules of
Practice and Procedure (18 CFR 385.211 and 385.214). Protests will be
considered by the Commission in determining the appropriate action to
be taken, but will not serve to make protestants parties to the
proceeding. Any person wishing to become a party must file a notice of
intervention or motion to intervene, as appropriate. Such notices,
motions, or protests must be filed in accordance with the provisions of
Section 154.210 of the Commission's regulations (18 CFR 154.210).
Anyone filing an intervention or protest must serve a copy of that
document on the Applicant. Anyone filing an intervention or protest on
or before the intervention or protest date need not serve motions to
intervene or protests on persons other than the Applicant.
    The Commission encourages electronic submission of protests and
interventions in lieu of paper using the

``eFiling'' link at http://www.ferc.gov. Persons unable to file

electronically should submit an original and 14 copies of the protest
or intervention to the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission, 888 First
Street, NE., Washington, DC 20426.
    This filing is accessible on-line at http://www.ferc.gov, using the

``eLibrary'' link and is available for review in the Commission's
Public Reference Room in Washington, DC. There is an ``eSubscription''
link on the Web site that enables subscribers to receive e-mail
notification when a document is added to a subscribed docket(s). For
assistance with any FERC Online service, please e-mail
<EMAIL_ADDRESS>or call<PHONE_NUMBER> (toll free). For

TTY, call<PHONE_NUMBER>.

Magalie R. Salas,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. E5-6686 Filed 11-29-05; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 6717-01-P


[Federal Register: December 8, 2008 (Volume 73, Number 236)]
[Notices]
[Page 74483]
[DOCID:fr08de08-43]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission

[Docket No. ER09-312-000]

LANXESS Corporation; Supplemental Notice That Initial Market-
Based Rate Filing Includes Request for Blanket Section 204
Authorization

December 2, 2008.
    This is a supplemental notice in the above-referenced proceeding of
LANXESS Corporation's application for market-based rate authority, with
an accompanying rate tariff, noting that such application includes a
request for blanket authorization, under 18 CFR part 34, of future
issuances of securities and assumptions of liability.
    Any person desiring to intervene or to protest should file with the
Federal Energy Regulatory Commission, 888 First Street, NE.,
Washington, DC 20426, in accordance with Rules 211 and 214 of the
Commission's Rules of Practice and Procedure (18 CFR 385.211 and
385.214). Anyone filing a motion to intervene or protest must serve a
copy of that document on the Applicant.
    Notice is hereby given that the deadline for filing protests with
regard to the applicant's request for blanket authorization, under 18
CFR part 34, of future issuances of securities and assumptions of
liability, is January 2, 2009.
    The Commission encourages electronic submission of protests and
interventions in lieu of paper, using the FERC Online links at http://
www.ferc.gov. To facilitate electronic service, persons with Internet
access who will eFile a document and/or be listed as a contact for an
intervenor must create and validate an eRegistration account using the
eRegistration link. Select the eFiling link to log on and submit the
intervention or protests.
    Persons unable to file electronically should submit an original and
14 copies of the intervention or protest to the Federal Energy
Regulatory Commission, 888 First St., NE., Washington, DC 20426.
    The filings in the above-referenced proceeding are accessible in
the Commission's eLibrary system by clicking on the appropriate link in
the above list. They are also available for review in the Commission's
Public Reference Room in Washington, DC. There is an eSubscription link
on the Web site that enables subscribers to receive e-mail notification
when a document is added to a subscribed docket(s). For assistance with
any FERC Online service, please e-mail<EMAIL_ADDRESS>or
call<PHONE_NUMBER> (toll free). For TTY, call<PHONE_NUMBER>.

Kimberly D. Bose,
Secretary.
 [FR Doc. E8-28926 Filed 12-5-08; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 6717-01-P


[Federal Register Volume 85, Number 114 (Friday, June 12, 2020)]
[Notices]
[Page 35972]
[FR Doc No: 2020-12842]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

Sunshine Act Meeting; Cancellation

FEDERAL REGISTER CITATION OF PREVIOUS ANNOUNCEMENT:  85 FR 34669, June
5, 2020.

PREVIOUSLY ANNOUNCED TIME AND DATE OF THE MEETING:  Wednesday, June 10,
2020 at 2:00 p.m.

CHANGES IN THE MEETING:  The Closed Meeting scheduled for Wednesday,
June 10, 2020 at 2:00 p.m., has been cancelled.

CONTACT PERSON FOR MORE INFORMATION:  For further information; please
contact Vanessa A. Countryman from the Office of the Secretary at (202)
551-5400.

    Dated: June 10, 2020.
Vanessa A. Countryman,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2020-12842 Filed 6-10-20; 11:15 am]
 BILLING CODE 8011-01-P