[Federal Register Volume 83, Number 35 (Wednesday, February 21, 2018)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Page 7395]
[FR Doc No: 2018-03470]

=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY

Coast Guard

33 CFR Part 117

[Docket No. USCG-2018-0097]

Drawbridge Operation Regulation; Mianus River, Greenwich, CT

AGENCY: Coast Guard, DHS.

ACTION: Notice of deviation from drawbridge regulation.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Coast Guard has issued a temporary deviation from the
operating schedule that governs the Metro-North Bridge across the
Mianus River, mile 1.0 at Greenwich, Connecticut. The deviation is
necessary to repair the superstructure and replace timber ties. This
deviation allows the bridge to be closed to navigation.

DATES: This deviation is effective from 8 a.m. on April 10, 2018 to 8
a.m. on May 14, 2018.

ADDRESSES: The docket for this deviation, USCG-2018-0097 is available
at http://www.regulations.gov. Type the docket number in the ``SEARCH''
box and click ``SEARCH''. Click on Open Docket Folder on the line
associated with this deviation.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: If you have questions on this
temporary deviation, call or email Mr. Jeffrey Stieb, First Coast Guard
District Bridge Branch, Coast Guard; telephone<PHONE_NUMBER>, email
[email protected].

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The owner of the bridge, the Connecticut
Department of Transportation (CT DOT), requested a temporary deviation
to conduct superstructure repair and timber ties replacement. The
Metro-North Bridge across the Mianus River, mile 1.0, at Greenwich
Connecticut has a vertical clearance in the closed position of 20 feet
at mean high water and 27 feet at mean low water. The existing bridge
operating regulations are found at 33 CFR 117.209.
    This temporary deviation allows the bridge to operate from 8 a.m.
April 10, 2018 to 8 a.m. on Monday, May 14, 2018 as follows: From 8
a.m. Monday through 4 p.m. Friday, the draw is authorized to remain
closed to navigation; from 4:01 p.m. Friday to 7:59 a.m. Monday, the
draw shall open with 24 hours advance notice.
    The deviation will have negligible effect on vessel navigation. The
waterway is transited primarily by seasonal recreational vessels and
small commercial fishing vessels. In 2016 there were six openings and
in 2017 there were 19 openings between the effective dates. CT DOT has
notified waterway users, the harbormaster, and town officials of the
requested deviation. No objections to the proposed closure were
received. Vessels that can pass through the bridge in the closed
position may continue to do so. The bridge will not be able to open for
emergencies and there is no immediate alternate route for vessels to
pass. CT DOT will issue a press release announcing the closure. The
Coast Guard will inform waterway users of the closure through Local and
Broadcast Notices to Mariners.
    In accordance with 33 CFR 117.35(e), the drawbridge must return to
its regular operating schedule immediately at the end of the effective
period of this temporary deviation. This deviation from the operating
regulations is authorized under 33 CFR 117.35.

    Dated: February 14, 2018.
Christopher J. Bisignano,
Supervisory Bridge Management Specialist, First Coast Guard District.
[FR Doc. 2018-03470 Filed 2-20-18; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 9110-04-P


MEMORANDUM TO: 3848.241 file FROM: Craig Simons, DPRA DATE: November 1, 1999 SUBJ: Record of communication with Progressive Circuits, Sacramento (Ed). (916 924 3532)

I called to ask about the minimum charge assumptions they experienced in handling F006. According to the 1995 BRS they generate about 26 tons per year of F006– I was told that that has increased– they generate about a tote per week (a tote being a super sack). They do still recycle– the F) 006 has a significant copper. It goes to 21 st Century in NV.

The material is picked up by 21 st Century– they basically ship every other moth. He said they pay a $75 charge for transport and about $275 per ton for recycling. He did not think landfilling was allowed. If the rule changed, they would undoubtedly reduce their costs, partly by using a different storage system (roll off bins instead of the super sacks).

Basically the totes use up a lot of room and they have to ship before getting a full load. With an extension of the accumulation period, they would probably go to a roll off bin.


Comment Info: =================

General Comment:Extended-release dexmethylphenidate 30 mg/d versus 20 mg/d: duration of attention, behavior, and performance benefits in children with attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder.


[Federal Register: May 29, 2008 (Volume 73, Number 104)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Page 30760-30763]
[DOCID:fr29my08-10]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION

Federal Aviation Administration

14 CFR Part 39

[Docket No. FAA-2007-0263; Directorate Identifier 2007-NM-207-AD;
Amendment 39-15530; AD 2008-11-08]
RIN 2120-AA64

Airworthiness Directives; Boeing Model 737-600, -700, -700C, -
800, -900, and -900ER Series Airplanes

AGENCY: Federal Aviation Administration (FAA), DOT.

ACTION: Final rule.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: We are adopting a new airworthiness directive (AD) for all
Boeing Model 737-600, -700, -700C, -800, -900, and -900ER series
airplanes. This AD requires repetitive inspections for any cracking of
or damage to the left side and right side flight deck No. 2, No. 4, and
No. 5 windows, as necessary, and corrective actions if necessary. This
AD results from reports of in-flight departure and separation of the
flight deck windows. We are issuing this AD to detect and correct
cracking in the vinyl interlayer or damage to the structural inner
glass panes of the flight deck No. 2, No. 4, and No. 5 windows, which
could result in loss of a window and rapid loss of cabin pressure. Loss
of cabin pressure could cause crew communication difficulties or crew
incapacitation.

DATES: This AD is effective July 3, 2008.
    The Director of the Federal Register approved the incorporation by
reference of certain publications listed in this AD as of July 3, 2008.

ADDRESSES: For service information identified in this AD, contact
Boeing Commercial Airplanes, P.O. Box 3707, Seattle, Washington 98124-
2207.

Examining the AD Docket

    You may examine the AD docket on the Internet at http://
www.regulations.gov; or in person at the Docket Management Facility
between 9 a.m. and 5 p.m., Monday through Friday, except Federal
holidays. The AD docket contains this AD, the regulatory evaluation,
any comments received, and other information. The address for the
Docket Office (telephone<PHONE_NUMBER>) is the Document Management
Facility, U.S. Department of Transportation, Docket Operations, M-30,
West Building Ground Floor, Room W12-140,

1200 New Jersey Avenue, SE., Washington, DC 20590.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Wayne Lockett, Aerospace Engineer,
Airframe Branch, ANM-120S, FAA, Seattle Aircraft Certification Office,
1601 Lind Avenue, SW., Renton, Washington 98057-3356; telephone (425)
917-6447; fax<PHONE_NUMBER>.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

Discussion

    We issued a notice of proposed rulemaking (NPRM) to amend 14 CFR
part 39 to include an airworthiness directive (AD) that would apply to
all Boeing Model 737-600, -700, -700C, -800, and -900 series airplanes.
That NPRM was published in the Federal Register on December 3, 2007 (72
FR 67864). That NPRM proposed to require repetitive inspections for any
cracking of or damage to the left side and right side flight deck No.
2, No. 4, and No. 5 windows, as necessary, and corrective actions if
necessary.

Changes Made to This AD

    We have revised the applicability of this AD to clearly identify
that Boeing Model 737-900ER series airplanes are also subject to the
requirements of this AD. These airplanes were not previously identified
in the applicability of the NPRM because they were type certificated
after issuance of Boeing Alert Service Bulletin 737-56A1022, dated July
18, 2007, which we referenced for the applicability of the NPRM.
Although these airplanes are not explicitly identified in the
effectivity of the service bulletin, they are included as Group 2
airplanes in the service bulletin.
    We have deleted paragraph (h)(4) of the NPRM and added a new
paragraph (h) to this AD specifying that installation of metallic
window blanks at cockpit eyebrow windows No. 4 and No. 5 in accordance
with Supplemental Type Certificate (STC) ST01630SE terminates the
initial and repetitive inspections for the flight deck No. 4 and No. 5
windows required by paragraph (f) of this AD. Incorporation of STC
ST01630SE is considered a terminating action, not an alternative method
of compliance (AMOC), since an AMOC can be issued only after an AD has
been issued. We also have reidentified the AMOC paragraph of the NPRM
as paragraph (j) in this AD.

Comments

    We gave the public the opportunity to participate in developing
this AD. We considered the comments received from the three commenters.

Support for the NPRM

    Boeing and AirTran Airways agree with the NPRM.

Request To Add Terminating Action

    AirTran Airways and Continental Airlines (CAL) request that we
revise the NPRM to specify that installing structural plugs at cockpit
eyebrow windows No. 4 and No. 5 in accordance with Boeing Service
Bulletin 737-56-1017, dated May 17, 2006; or Revision 1, dated February
15, 2007; terminates the initial and repetitive inspections for the
flight deck No. 4 and No. 5 windows. CAL notes that a similar statement
is found in Tables 2 and 3 of Boeing Alert Service Bulletin 737-
56A1022, dated July 18, 2007. (We referred to Boeing Alert Service
Bulletin 737-56A1022 as the appropriate source of service information
for accomplishing the proposed requirements of the NPRM.)
    We agree with the commenters and have added a new paragraph (i) to
this AD accordingly.

Request To Revise the Applicability

    CAL requests that we limit the applicability of the NPRM to
airplanes delivered before line number 2589. As justification, CAL
states that new production airplanes do not include the flight deck No.
4 and No. 5 windows, and that Boeing is in the final stages of
approving a new, improved flight deck No. 2 window, part numbers 5-
89355-87 and -88. According to CAL, the new, improved No. 2 window,
which is manufactured by PPG Aerospace, is designed specifically to
address the unsafe condition of the NPRM. CAL also states that Boeing
plans to install the new, improved No. 2 windows on new production
airplanes this year.
    We do not agree to exclude any airplanes from the applicability of
this AD. The affected flight deck No. 2 windows are interchangeable
with the new, improved windows manufactured by PPG Aerospace;
therefore, the unsafe condition could be introduced on a new production
airplane if an affected No. 2 window is installed after airplane
delivery. We have not changed this AD in this regard.

Request To Track Compliance Time by Flight Cycles

    AirTran Airways requests that we add an option to this AD to allow
operators to track the inspections by airplane flight cycles instead of
window flight hours, provided that any used window is inspected before
it is installed. AirTran Airways states that tracking compliance by a
component rather than by airplane is more difficult due to the extra
work and documentation generated for the removal and installation of a
component. According to AirTran Airways, tracking compliance by
component also increases the opportunity for human factor errors.
AirTran Airways also states that tracking inspections by airplane
flight cycles will accomplish the inspections within the same timeframe
as proposed in the NPRM and be less of a burden.
    We disagree with allowing operators to track compliance by airplane
flight cycles because the unsafe condition is primarily related to
window flight hours. The utilization of airplanes within the fleet
varies from short to long flight hours per flight cycle. Therefore, we
have not changed this AD in this regard.

Request To Revise the Compliance Time for the No. 2 Window

    CAL requests that we revise the compliance time for the initial
inspection of the flight deck No. 2 window to within 36 months or 7,500
flight hours, whichever occurs first, after the window installation; or
to within 24 months, for windows installed more than 36 months ago or
for windows where the number of flight hours is unknown. CAL states
that the NPRM, which proposes to require the initial inspection within
24 months after the effective date of this AD regardless of the age or
flight time of the window, unnecessarily penalizes operators who
proactively inspect and replace the No. 2 window before the AD is
issued. CAL also states that, according to the wording in the NPRM, a
window replaced one day before the effective date of the AD would need
to be re-inspected within 24 months, but a window inspected and
replaced one day after the effective date of the AD would not need to
be re-inspected until 36 months or 7,500 window flight hours.
    We do not agree to revise the compliance time for the initial
inspection of the flight deck No. 2 window. According to paragraph (e)
of this AD, an operator is responsible for having the actions required
by this AD performed within the compliance times specified, unless the
actions have already been done. If the initial inspection of the No. 2
window was done before the effective date of this AD in accordance with
Boeing Alert Service Bulletin 737-56A1022, dated July 18, 2007, then
the initial inspection does not need to be accomplished again; only the
repetitive inspections would need to be accomplished in accordance with
the service bulletin at the applicable interval specified in the
service bulletin.

If the initial and repetitive inspections of the No. 2 window are done
before the effective date of this AD, but are not done in accordance
with the service bulletin, then those inspections are not acceptable
for compliance with this AD unless an AMOC is issued for those prior
inspections. Under the provisions of paragraph (j) of this AD, we will
consider requests for approval of an AMOC if sufficient data are
submitted to substantiate that prior inspections incorporate similar
criteria to what is provided for in the service bulletin. Therefore, no
change to this AD is necessary in this regard.

Request for an AMOC for a Parts Manufacturer Approval (PMA) Equivalent
Part

    CAL states that the FAA has approved a new, improved flight deck
No. 2 window designed by GKN Aerospace Transparency Systems, under PMA
Holder No. PQ1250NM, Supplement 10, dated September 17, 2007. CAL also
states that the new, improved No. 2 window was designed to prevent the
premature failure of the window, and that the new, improved window
addresses the unsafe condition of the NPRM. CAL, therefore, requests
that we add a new AMOC paragraph to this AD, which would exempt the
new, improved No. 2 window from the required inspections.
    We do not agree to allow the PMA equivalent No. 2 window as an AMOC
to the required inspections. Although the window has been approved as a
PMA equivalent part, the commenter has not provided data showing that
the PMA equivalent window is not susceptible to the same vinyl
interlayer cracking. However, under the provisions of paragraph (j) of
this AD, we will consider requests for approval of an AMOC if
sufficient data are submitted to substantiate that the design change
would provide an acceptable level of safety. No change to this AD is
necessary in this regard.

Conclusion

    We reviewed the relevant data, considered the comments received,
and determined that air safety and the public interest require adopting
the AD with the changes described previously. We also determined that
these changes will not increase the economic burden on any operator or
increase the scope of the AD.

Costs of Compliance

    There are about 2,127 airplanes of the affected design in the
worldwide fleet. This AD affects about 737 airplanes of U.S. registry.
The required actions take about 2 work hours per airplane, at an
average labor rate of $80 per work hour. Based on these figures, the
estimated cost of the AD for U.S. operators is $117,920, or $160 per
airplane, per inspection cycle.

Authority for This Rulemaking

    Title 49 of the United States Code specifies the FAA's authority to
issue rules on aviation safety. Subtitle I, section 106, describes the
authority of the FAA Administrator. ``Subtitle VII: Aviation
Programs,'' describes in more detail the scope of the Agency's
authority.
    We are issuing this rulemaking under the authority described in
``Subtitle VII, Part A, Subpart III, Section 44701: General
requirements.'' Under that section, Congress charges the FAA with
promoting safe flight of civil aircraft in air commerce by prescribing
regulations for practices, methods, and procedures the Administrator
finds necessary for safety in air commerce. This regulation is within
the scope of that authority because it addresses an unsafe condition
that is likely to exist or develop on products identified in this
rulemaking action.

Regulatory Findings

    This AD will not have federalism implications under Executive Order
13132. This AD will not have a substantial direct effect on the States,
on the relationship between the national government and the States, or
on the distribution of power and responsibilities among the various
levels of government.
    For the reasons discussed above, I certify that this AD:
    (1) Is not a ``significant regulatory action'' under Executive
Order 12866,
    (2) Is not a ``significant rule'' under DOT Regulatory Policies and
Procedures (44 FR 11034, February 26, 1979), and
    (3) Will not have a significant economic impact, positive or
negative, on a substantial number of small entities under the criteria
of the Regulatory Flexibility Act.
    You can find our regulatory evaluation and the estimated costs of
compliance in the AD Docket.

List of Subjects in 14 CFR Part 39

    Air transportation, Aircraft, Aviation safety, Incorporation by
reference, Safety.

Adoption of the Amendment

0
Accordingly, under the authority delegated to me by the Administrator,
the FAA amends 14 CFR part 39 as follows:

PART 39--AIRWORTHINESS DIRECTIVES

0
1. The authority citation for part 39 continues to read as follows:

    Authority: 49 U.S.C. 106(g), 40113, 44701.

Sec.  39.13  [Amended]

0
2. The FAA amends Sec.  39.13 by adding the following new AD:

2008-11-08 Boeing: Amendment 39-15530. Docket No. FAA-2007-0263;
Directorate Identifier 2007-NM-207-AD.

Effective Date

    (a) This airworthiness directive (AD) is effective July 3, 2008.

Affected ADs

    (b) None.

Applicability

    (c) This AD applies to all Boeing Model 737-600, -700, -700C, -
800, -900, and -900ER series airplanes, certificated in any
category.

Unsafe Condition

    (d) This AD results from reports of in-flight departure and
separation of the flight deck windows. We are issuing this AD to
detect and correct cracking in the vinyl interlayer or damage to the
structural inner glass panes of the flight deck No. 2, No. 4, and
No. 5 windows, which could result in loss of a window and rapid loss
of cabin pressure. Loss of cabin pressure could cause crew
communication difficulties or crew incapacitation.

Compliance

    (e) You are responsible for having the actions required by this
AD performed within the compliance times specified, unless the
actions have already been done.

Repetitive Inspections and Replacement

    (f) At the applicable times specified in Tables 1, 2, and 3 of
paragraph 1.E. of Boeing Alert Service Bulletin 737-56A1022, dated
July 18, 2007, except as provided by paragraph (g) of this AD: Do
the internal and external detailed inspections for any cracking of
or damage to the left side and right side flight deck No. 2, No. 4,
and No. 5 windows, as applicable, and do the applicable corrective
actions before further flight, by accomplishing all of the
applicable actions specified in the Accomplishment Instructions of
Boeing Alert Service Bulletin 737-56A1022, dated July 18, 2007.
Repeat the inspections thereafter at the applicable interval
specified in paragraph 1.E. of Boeing Alert Service Bulletin 737-
56A1022, dated July 18, 2007.

Exception to Compliance Times

    (g) Where Tables 1, 2, and 3 of paragraph 1.E. of Boeing Alert
Service Bulletin 737-56A1022, dated July 18, 2007, specify counting
the compliance time from `` * * * the date on this service
bulletin,'' this AD requires counting the compliance time from the
effective date of this AD.

Optional Terminating Actions

    (h) Installation of metallic window blanks at cockpit eyebrow
windows No. 4 and No. 5 in accordance with Supplemental Type
Certificate ST01630SE terminates the initial and repetitive
inspections for the flight deck No. 4 and No. 5 windows required by
paragraph (f) of this AD. All other applicable actions required by
paragraph (f) of this AD must be fully complied with.
    (i) Installation of structural plugs at cockpit eyebrow windows
No. 4 and No. 5 in accordance with Boeing Service Bulletin 737-56-
1017, dated May 17, 2006; or Revision 1, dated February 15, 2007,
terminates the initial and repetitive inspections for the flight
deck No. 4 and No. 5 windows required by paragraph (f) of this AD.
All other applicable actions required by paragraph (f) of this AD
must be fully complied with.

Alternative Methods of Compliance (AMOCs)

    (j)(1) The Manager, Seattle Aircraft Certification Office (ACO),
FAA, has the authority to approve AMOCs for this AD, if requested in
accordance with the procedures found in 14 CFR 39.19.
    (2) To request a different method of compliance or a different
compliance time for this AD, follow the procedures in 14 CFR 39.19.
Before using any approved AMOC on any airplane to which the AMOC
applies, notify your appropriate principal inspector (PI) in the FAA
Flight Standards District Office (FSDO), or lacking a PI, your local
FSDO.
    (3) An AMOC that provides an acceptable level of safety may be
used for any repair required by this AD, if it is approved by an
Authorized Representative for the Boeing Commercial Airplanes
Delegation Option Authorization Organization who has been authorized
by the Manager, Seattle ACO, to make those findings. For a repair
method to be approved, the repair must meet the certification basis
of the airplane, and the approval must specifically refer to this
AD.

Material Incorporated by Reference

    (k) You must use Boeing Alert Service Bulletin 737-56A1022,
dated July 18, 2007, to do the actions required by this AD, unless
the AD specifies otherwise. If you do the optional actions specified
in this AD, you must use Boeing Service Bulletin 737-56-1017, dated
May 17, 2006; or Boeing Service Bulletin 737-56-1017, Revision 1,
dated February 15, 2007, unless the AD specifies otherwise.
    (1) The Director of the Federal Register approved the
incorporation by reference of this service information under 5
U.S.C. 552(a) and 1 CFR part 51.
    (2) For service information identified in this AD, contact
Boeing Commercial Airplanes, P.O. Box 3707, Seattle, Washington
98124-2207.
    (3) You may review copies of the service information
incorporated by reference at the FAA, Transport Airplane
Directorate, 1601 Lind Avenue, SW., Renton, Washington; or at the
National Archives and Records Administration (NARA). For information
on the availability of this material at NARA, call<PHONE_NUMBER>, or
go to: http://www.archives.gov/federal_register/code_of_federal_
regulations/ibr_locations.html.

    Issued in Renton, Washington, on May 10, 2008.
Michael J. Kaszycki,
Acting Manager, Transport Airplane Directorate, Aircraft Certification
Service.
[FR Doc. E8-11336 Filed 5-28-08; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4910-13-P


[Federal Register: June 27, 2007 (Volume 72, Number 123)]
[Notices]
[Page 35227-35230]
[DOCID:fr27jn07-55]

=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY

[EPA-HQ-OW-2007-0142; FRL-8332-1]

Agency Information Collection Activities; Proposed Collection;
Comment Request; See List of ICRs Planned To Be Submitted in Section A

AGENCY: Environmental Protection Agency (EPA).

ACTION: Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: In compliance with the Paperwork Reduction Act (44 U.S.C. 3501
et seq.), this notice announces that EPA is planning to submit a
request to renew three existing Information Collection Requests (ICR)
to the Office of Management and Budget (OMB). Before submitting the
ICRs to OMB for review and approval, EPA is soliciting comments on
specific aspects of the information collections as described at the
beginning of SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION.

DATES: Comments must be submitted on or before August 27, 2007.

ADDRESSES: Submit your comments, identified by Docket ID No. EPA-HQ-OW-
2007-0142, by one of the following methods:
     http://www.regulations.gov: Follow the online instructions

for submitting comments.
     E-mail<EMAIL_ADDRESS>(Identify Docket ID No. EPA-HQ-
OW-2007-0142 in the subject line).
     Mail: Water Docket, Environmental Protection Agency,
Mailcode: 4203M, 1200 Pennsylvania Ave., NW., Washington, DC 20460.
Please include a total of three copies.
     Hand Delivery: EPA Docket Center, EPA West, Room 3334,
1301 Constitution Avenue, NW., Washington, DC 20460. Such deliveries
are only accepted during the Docket's normal hours of operation, and
special arrangements should be made for deliveries of boxed
information.
    Instructions: Direct your comments identified by the Docket ID No.
EPA-HQ-OW-2007-0142. EPA's policy is that all comments received will be
included in the public docket without change and may be made available
online at http://www.regulations.gov, including any personal

information provided, unless the comment includes information claimed
to be Confidential Business Information (CBI) or other information
whose disclosure is restricted by statute. Do not submit information
that you consider to be CBI or otherwise protected through http://www.regulations.gov
 or e-mail. The www.regulations.gov Web site is an

``anonymous access'' system, which means EPA will not know your
identity or contact information unless you provide it in the body of
your comment. If you send an e-mail comment directly to EPA without
going through http://www.regulations.gov, your e-mail address will be

automatically captured and included as part of the comment that is
placed in the public docket and made available on the Internet. If you
submit an electronic comment, EPA recommends that you include your name
and other contact information in the body of your comment and with any
disk or CD-ROM you submit. If EPA cannot read your comment due to
technical difficulties and cannot contact you for clarification, EPA
may not be able to consider your comment. Electronic files should avoid
the use of special characters, any form of encryption, and be free of
any defects or viruses. For additional information about EPA's public
docket, visit the EPA Docket Center homepage at http://www.epa.gov/epahome/dockets.htm
.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Amelia Letnes, State and Regional
Branch, Water Permits Division, OWM Mail Code: 4203M, Environmental
Protection Agency, 1200 Pennsylvania

Ave., NW., Washington, DC 20460; telephone number:<PHONE_NUMBER>; e-
mail address<EMAIL_ADDRESS>
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

For All ICRS

    An Agency may not conduct or sponsor, and a person is not required
to respond to collection information unless it displays a currently
valid OMB control number. The OMB control numbers for EPA's regulations
are displayed in 40 CFR part 9.
    Burden means the total time, effort, or financial resources
expended by persons to generate, maintain, retain, or disclose or
provide information to or for a Federal agency. This includes the time
needed to review instructions; develop, acquire, install, and utilize
technology and systems for the purposes of collecting, validating, and
verifying information, processing and maintaining information, and
disclosing and providing information; adjust the existing ways to
comply with any previously applicable instructions and requirements;
train personnel to be able to respond to a collection of information;
search data sources; complete and review the collection of information;
and transmit or otherwise disclose the information.

How Can I Access the Docket and/or Submit Comments?

    EPA has established a public docket for these ICRs under Docket ID
No. EPA-HQ-OW-2007-0142, which is available for online viewing at
http://www.regulations.gov, or in person viewing at the Water Docket in

the EPA Docket Center (EPA/DC), EPA West, Room 3334, 1301 Constitution
Ave., NW., Washington, DC. The EPA/DC Public Reading Room is open from
8 a.m. to 4:30 p.m., Monday through Friday, excluding legal holidays.
The telephone number for the Reading Room is<PHONE_NUMBER>, and the
telephone number for the Water Docket is<PHONE_NUMBER>.
    Use http://www.regulations.gov to obtain a copy of the draft

collection of information, submit or view public comments, access the
index listing of the contents of the docket, and to access those
documents in the public docket that are available electronically. Once
in the system, select ``search,'' then key in the docket ID number
identified in this document.

What Information Is EPA Particularly Interested in?

    Pursuant to section 3506(c)(2)(A) of the PRA, EPA specifically
solicits comments and information to enable it to:
    (i) Evaluate whether the proposed collection of information is
necessary for the proper performance of the functions of the Agency,
including whether the information will have practical utility;
    (ii) Evaluate the accuracy of the Agency's estimate of the burden
of the proposed collection of information, including the validity of
the methodology and assumptions used;
    (iii) Enhance the quality, utility, and clarity of the information
to be collected; and
    (iv) Minimize the burden of the collection of information on those
who are to respond, including through the use of appropriate automated
electronic, mechanical, or other technological collection techniques or
other forms of information technology, e.g., permitting electronic
submission of responses. In particular, EPA is requesting comments from
very small businesses (those that employ less than 25) on examples of
specific additional efforts that EPA could make to reduce the paperwork
burden for very small businesses affected by this collection.

What Should I Consider When I Prepare My Comments for EPA?

    You may find the following suggestions helpful for preparing your
comments:
    1. Explain your views as clearly as possible and provide specific
examples.
    2. Describe any assumptions that you used.
    3. Provide copies of technical information/data you used that
support your views.
    4. If you estimate potential burden or costs, explain how you
arrived at the estimate that you provide.
    5. Offer alternative ways to improve the collection activity.
    6. Make sure to submit your comments by the deadline identified
under DATES.
    7. To ensure proper receipt by EPA, be sure to identify the docket
ID number assigned to this action in the subject line on the first page
of your response. You may also provide the name, date, and Federal
Register citation.

A. List of ICRS Planned To Be Submitted

    (1) Concentrated Aquatic Animal Production Point Source Category
Effluent Guidelines Reporting and Recordkeeping Requirements, EPA ICR
Number 2087.03, OMB Control Number 2040-0258, expiration date 09/30/
2007.
    (2) National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (NPDES)/
Compliance Assessment/Certification Information, EPA ICR Number
1427.08, OMB Control Number 2040-0110, expiration date 09/30/2007.
    (3) National Pretreatment Program, EPA ICR Number 0002.13, OMB
Control Number 2040-0009, expiration date 09/30/2007.

B. Individual ICRS

    (1) Concentrated Aquatic Animal Production Point Source Category
Effluent Guidelines Reporting and Recordkeeping Requirements, EPA ICR
Number 2087.03, OMB Control Number 2040-0258, expiration date 09/30/
2007.
    Affected Entities: Entities potentially affected by this action are
a subset of facilities engaged in aquatic animal production defined to
40 CFR part 451.
    Abstract: This ICR requests OMB renewal of the ICR for the:
``Effluent Limitations Guidelines and Standards for Concentrated
Aquatic Animal Production (CAAP) Point Source Category'' (Effluent
Guidelines). The rule establishes specific reporting requirements for a
segment of CAAP facilities through NPDES permits. The rule covers
facilities which are defined as CAAP facilities (see 40 CFR 122.24 and
40 CFR part 122 Appendix C) and produce at least 100,000 pounds per
year in flow through, recirculating and net pen systems.
    The rule includes special reporting and recordkeeping requirements
which are the subject of this ICR. CAAP facility owners or operators
are also required to file reports with the permitting authority when
drugs with special approvals are applied to the production units or a
failure in the structural integrity occurs in the aquatic animal
containment system.
    When CAAP facilities apply either an Investigational New Animal
Drug (INAD) or a drug that has been prescribed extra-label by a
veterinarian to treat the aquatic animals at their facility, the owner
or operator must report this use to the permitting authority. In
addition, the owner or operator of a CAAP facility must notify the
permitting authority upon agreeing to participate in an INAD study.
    Whenever a structural failure occurs in the aquatic animal
containment system, the owner or operator must report this to the
permitting authority. For the purposes of this requirement, the aquatic
animal containment system is defined as the unit(s) that contain(s) the
aquatic animals and in which their culture takes place, as well as the
wastewater handling and treatment units associated with aquatic animal
production.
    CAAP facilities subject to this regulation are also required to
develop and implement a Best Management

Practices (BMP) plan that ensures that the regulatory requirements will
be met. Upon completion of this BMP plan, the owner or operator must
certify to the permitting authority that the plan has been developed.
    CAAP facilities are also expected to keep records of the feed
inputs along with an estimate of the number and weight of the animals
being raised. These records are to be used to calculate the feed
conversion ratios for the facility. Records must also be kept
documenting the frequency of facility inspections, maintenance and
repairs, along with the cleaning of the rearing units at flow through
and recirculating facilities or changing the nets at net pen
facilities.
    This information collection may contain CBI, especially the
reporting requirements associated with investigational drug use. If
this is the case, the respondent may request that such information be
treated as confidential. All confidential data will be handled in
accordance with 40 CFR 122.7, 40 CFR part 2 and EPA's Security Manual.
However, Clean Water Act (CWA) sec. 308(b) specifically states that
effluent data may not be treated as confidential.
    Burden Statement: The annual public reporting and recordkeeping
burden for this collection of information is estimated to average 180
hours per respondent per year, or 60 hours per response.
    Estimated total number of potential respondents: 245 (200
facilities and 45 States).
    Frequency of response: Once every five years, on occasion, on-
going.
    Estimated total average number of responses for each respondent:
Three.
    Estimated total annual burden hours: 44,196 hours.
    Estimated total annual costs: $971,500. This includes an estimated
burden cost of $971,500 and an estimated cost of $0 for capital
investment or maintenance and operational costs.
    Change in Burden: There is a decrease of 4 hours in the total
estimated respondent burden compared with that identified in the ICR
currently approved by OMB. This decrease reflects EPA's corrections to
the 2004 ICR and is not the result of changes to the requirements
covered by this ICR.
    (2) National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (NPDES)/
Compliance Assessment/Certification Information, EPA ICR Number
1427.08, OMB Control Number 2040-0110, expiration date 09/30/2007.
    Affected Entities: Entities potentially affected by this action are
most facilities required to have NPDES permit coverage, including but
not limited to publicly owned treatment works (POTWs), privately owned
treatment works (PrOTWs), manufacturing and commercial dischargers,
mining operations, and Concentrated Animal Feeding Operations (CAFOs).
    Abstract: The purpose of this ICR is to calculate the burden and
costs associated with the data requirements necessary for a permitting
authority (either an authorized State or the Environmental Protection
Agency (EPA)) to determine whether an existing NPDES or sewage sludge
permittee is in compliance with the conditions of its permit.
    A permitting authority collects information necessary to determine
a permittee's compliance with specific permit requirements during the
effective term of a given permit. Compliance assessment reporting
requirements include routine submittals (e.g., annual certifications
and reports submitted when a compliance schedule milestone is reached)
and non-routine submittals (e.g., required when certain conditions
occur, such as an unanticipated bypass). NPDES staff may use this
information to determine if follow-up activities are necessary.
    This ICR includes burden hours and costs associated with
noncompliance reports for Concentrated Animal Feeding Operations
(CAFOs) not accounted for in the NPDES Regulation and Effluent
Limitation Guidelines and Standards for Concentrated Animal Feeding
Operations ICR (EPA ICR No. 1989.04; OMB No. 2040-0250).
    Five additional effluent limitations guidelines development ICRs
are set to expire in the next three years prior to the next renewal of
this Compliance Assessment/Certification ICR. The burden for direct
dischargers associated with those five ICRs has been incorporated into
the Compliance Assessment/Certification ICR as part of this renewal
process. The five ICRs include:
    1. Milestone Plans for the Bleached Papergrade Kraft and Soda
Subcategory of the Pulp, Paper, and Paperboard Point Source Category
(40 CFR part 430), EPA ICR No. 1877.02, OMB Control No. 2040-0202;
    2. Best Management Practices (BMPs) for Bleached Papergrade Kraft
and Soda Subcategory and the Papergrade Kraft Sulfite Subcategory of
the Pulp, Paper, and Paperboard Point Source Category (40 CFR part
430), EPA ICR No. 1829.02, OMB Control No. 2040-0207;
    3. Baseline Standards and Best Management Practices for the Coal
Mining Point Source Category (40 CFR part 434)--Coal Remining
Subcategory and Western Alkaline Coal Mining Subcategory, EPA ICR No.
1944.02, OMB Control No. 2040-0239;
    4. Voluntary Certification in Lieu of Chloroform Minimum Monitoring
Requirements for Direct and Indirect Discharging Mills in the Bleached
Papergrade Kraft and Soda Subcategory of the Pulp, Paper and Paperboard
Manufacturing Category (40 CFR part 430), EPA ICR No. 2015.01, OMB
Control No. 2040-0242; and
    5. Minimum Monitoring Requirements for Direct and Indirect
Discharging Mills in the Bleached Papergrade Kraft and Soda Subcategory
and the Papergrade Sulfite Subcategory of the Pulp, Paper and
Paperboard Manufacturing Category (40 CFR part 430), EPA ICR No.
1878.01, OMB Control No. 2040-0243.
    Burden Statement: The annual average reporting and recordkeeping
burden for this collection of information by facilities responding is
estimated to be 4.47 hours per respondent (i.e., an annual average of
2,015,231 hours of burden divided among an anticipated annual average
of 450,509 unique facilities). The State reporting and recordkeeping
burden is estimated to average 1,117 hours per State respondent (i.e.,
an annual average of 51,384 hours of burden divided among 46 States).
    Estimated total number of potential respondents: 450,555 (450,509
facilities and 46 States).
    Frequency of response: Every five years, annual, semiannual,
quarterly, monthly, on occasion.
    Estimated total average number of responses for each respondent:
2.41 (1.1 for facilities, 637 for States)
    Estimated total annual burden hours: 2,066,615 hours.
    Estimated total annual costs: $92,351,594. This includes an
estimated burden cost of $92,351,594 and an estimated cost of $0 for
capital investment or maintenance and operational costs.
    Change in Burden: There is an increase of 257,035 hours (14.2%) in
the total estimated respondent burden compared with that identified in
the ICR currently approved by OMB. This increase is the result of the
migration of burden from the five ICRs listed above to this ICR and the
increase in the number of expected stormwater construction and other
non-stormwater general permittees. It is not the result of changes to
the requirements covered by this ICR.
    (3) National Pretreatment Program, EPA ICR Number 0002.13, OMB
Control

Number 2040-0009, expiration date 09/30/2007.
    Affected Entities: Various industrial categories, publicly owned
treatment works (POTWs), Local and State governments
    Abstract: This ICR calculates the burden and costs associated with
managing and implementing the National Pretreatment Program as mandated
under CWA sections 402(a) and (b) and 307(b). This ICR includes all
existing tasks under the National Pretreatment Program, as amended by
the EPA's recent Streamlining Rule. It integrates key elements from two
existing ICRs whose approvals are due to expire shortly: (1)
Information Collection Request for the National Pretreatment Program,
OMB Control No.: 2040-0009, EPA ICR No.: 0002.11, June 7, 2005, and (2)
Revision of the Information Collection Request for the National
Pretreatment Program (Pretreatment Streamlining ICR) (Title 40 of the
Code of Federal Regulations [CFR] Part 403), OMB Control No. 2040-0009,
EPA ICR No. 0002.12, September 22, 2005.
    EPA's Office of Wastewater Management (OWM) in the Office of Water
(OW) is responsible for the management of the pretreatment program. The
CWA requires EPA to develop national pretreatment standards to control
discharges from Industrial Users (IUs) into POTWs. These standards
limit the level of certain pollutants allowed in non-domestic
wastewater that is discharged to a POTW. EPA administers the
pretreatment program through the NPDES permit program. Under the NPDES
permit program, EPA may approve State or individual POTW implementation
of the pretreatment standards at their respective levels. Data
collected from IUs during implementation of the pretreatment program
include the mass, frequency, and content of IU discharges and IU
schedules for installing pretreatment equipment. Data also include
actual or anticipated IU discharges of wastes that violate pretreatment
standards, have the potential to cause problems at the POTW, or are
considered hazardous under the Resource Conservation and Recovery Act
(RCRA). OWM uses the data collected under the pretreatment program to
monitor and enforce compliance with the pretreatment regulations, as
well as to authorize program administration at the State or Local
(POTW) level. States and POTWs applying for approval of their
pretreatment programs submit data concerning their legal, procedural,
and administrative bases for establishing such programs. This
information may include surveys of IUs, local limits for pollutant
concentrations, and schedules for completion of major project
requirements. IUs and POTWs submit written reports to the approved
State or EPA. These data may then be entered into the NPDES databases
by the approved State or by EPA.
    Four additional effluent limitations guidelines development ICRs
are set to expire within the next three years, before the next renewal
of this Pretreatment Program ICR. The burden for indirect dischargers
associated with those four ICRs has been incorporated into this
Pretreatment Program ICR as part of this renewal process. The four ICRs
are the following:
    1. Pollution Prevention Compliance Alternative; Transportation
Equipment Cleaning Point Source Category (40 CFR part 442), EPA ICR No.
2018.02, OMB Control No. 2040-0235.
    2. Voluntary Certification in Lieu of Chloroform Minimum Monitoring
Requirements for Direct and Indirect Discharging Mills in the Bleached
Papergrade Kraft and Soda Subcategory of the Pulp, Paper and Paperboard
Manufacturing Category (40 CFR part 430), EPA ICR No. 2015.01, OMB
Control No. 2040-0242.
    3. Best Management Practices (BMPs) for Bleached Papergrade Kraft
and Soda Subcategory and the Papergrade Kraft Sulfite Subcategory of
the Pulp, Paper, and Paperboard Point Source Category (40 CFR part
430), EPA ICR No. 1829.02, OMB Control No. 2040-0207.
    4. Minimum Monitoring Requirements for Direct and Indirect
Discharging Mills in the Bleached Papergrade Kraft and Soda Subcategory
and the Papergrade Sulfite Subcategory of the Pulp, Paper and
Paperboard Manufacturing Category (40 CFR part 430), EPA ICR No.
1878.01, OMB Control No. 2040-0243.
    Burden Statement: The annual public reporting and recordkeeping
burden for this collection of information is estimated to average 67.8
hours per respondent per year, or 68 hours per response.
    Estimated total number of potential respondents: 24,740 (35 States,
1,512 POTWs and 23,193 industrial users).
    Frequency of response: On occasion, semi-annually, annually, and as
needed.
    Estimated total average number of responses for each respondent:
4.1.
    Estimated total annual burden hours: 1,806,020 hours.
    Estimated total annual costs: $80,688,312. This includes an
estimated burden cost of $80,698,312 and an estimated cost of $10,000
for capital investment or maintenance and operational costs.
    Change in Burden: There is a decrease of 142,439 (7.3%) hours in
the total estimated respondent burden compared with that identified in
the ICR currently approved by OMB. There are burden increases reflected
in this ICR due to increases in the estimates of state respondents,
number of approved programs, and incorporation of burden from other
ICRs. However, the main change in burden is reflected in a decrease in
the number of SIUs. EPA revised the estimated number of SIUs and
pretreatment programs after extensive consultation with the EPA regions
and a thorough examination of PCS data. This resulted in an overall
decrease in the burden of this ICR.

    Dated: June 22, 2007.
James A. Hanlon,
Director, Office of Wastewater Management.
[FR Doc. E7-12445 Filed 6-26-07; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 6560-50-P


[Federal Register Volume 78, Number 20 (Wednesday, January 30, 2013)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Pages 6206-6208]
[FR Doc No: 2013-01361]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION

Federal Aviation Administration

14 CFR Part 39

[Docket No. FAA-2013-0030; Directorate Identifier 2012-NE-42-AD;
Amendment 39-17325; AD 2013-02-04]
RIN 2120-AA64

Airworthiness Directives; Rolls-Royce plc Turbofan Engines

AGENCY: Federal Aviation Administration (FAA), DOT.

ACTION: Final rule; request for comments.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: We are adopting a new airworthiness directive (AD) for all
Rolls-Royce plc RB211-Trent 970-84, RB211-Trent 970B-84, RB211-Trent
972-84, RB211-Trent 972B-84, RB211-Trent 977-84, RB211-Trent 977B-84
and RB211-Trent 980-84 turbofan engines. This AD requires on-wing
inspections of low-pressure turbine (LPT) disk seal fins and interstage
seals when post-flight review indicates Engine Health Monitoring (EHM)
vibratory maintenance-alert limits were exceeded in flight. The AD also
requires in-shop inspections of the LPT disk seal fins and interstage
seals to detect cracks or damage and, depending on the findings,
accomplishment of corrective action. This AD is prompted by a Trent 900
engine experiencing LPT stage 2 disk interstage seal material loss and
increased low-pressure rotor vibration while in flight. We are issuing
this AD to prevent cracks in the LPT disk, which could result in
uncontained engine failure and damage to the airplane.

DATES: This AD becomes effective February 14, 2013.
    We must receive comments on this AD by March 18, 2013.
    The Director of the Federal Register approved the incorporation by
reference of a certain publication listed in the AD as of February 14,
2013.

ADDRESSES: You may send comments by any of the following methods:
     Federal eRulemaking Portal: Go to http://www.regulations.gov and follow the instructions for sending your
comments electronically.
     Mail: U.S. Department of Transportation, 1200 New Jersey
Avenue SE., West Building Ground Floor, Room W12-140, Washington, DC
20590-0001.
     Hand Delivery: Deliver to Mail address above between 9
a.m. and 5 p.m., Monday through Friday, except Federal holidays.
     Fax:<PHONE_NUMBER>.
    For service information identified in this AD, contact Rolls-Royce
plc, Corporate Communications, P.O. Box 31, Derby, England, DE248BJ;
phone: 011-44-1332-242424; fax: 011-44-1332-245418, or email: http://www.rolls-royce.com/contact/civil_team.jsp. You may view this service
information at the FAA, Engine & Propeller Directorate, 12 New England
Executive Park, Burlington, MA 01803. For information on the
availability of this material at the FAA, call<PHONE_NUMBER>.

Examining the AD Docket

    You may examine the AD docket on the Internet at http://www.regulations.gov; or in person at the Docket Operations office
between 9 a.m. and 5 p.m., Monday through Friday, except Federal
holidays. The AD docket contains this AD, the regulatory evaluation,
any comments received, and other information. The street address for
the Docket Operations office (phone:<PHONE_NUMBER>) is the same as the
Mail address provided in the ADDRESSES section. Comments will be
available in the AD docket shortly after receipt.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Robert Green, Aerospace Engineer,
Engine Certification Office, FAA, Engine & Propeller Directorate, 12
New England Executive Park, Burlington, MA 01803; phone:<PHONE_NUMBER>;
fax:<PHONE_NUMBER>; email<EMAIL_ADDRESS>
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

Discussion

    The European Aviation Safety Agency (EASA), which is the Technical
Agent for the Member States of the European Community, has issued EASA
Airworthiness Directive 2012-0220, dated October 22, 2012, a Mandatory

Continuing Airworthiness Information (referred to after this as ``the
MCAI''), to correct an unsafe condition for the specified products. The
MCAI states:

    Following a revenue service flight, a Trent 900 engine
experienced increased low-pressure vibration. The vibration did not
exceed any engine limits, and the engine was not shut down during
flight. Upon post-flight inspection of the engine, debris was found
in the exhaust tail pipe and the engine was removed. The results of
a subsequent strip inspection revealed that the stage 2 Low-Pressure
Turbine (LPT) disc had suffered material loss from a portion of the
Interstage Seal (ISS) area of the disc, with impact damage to
downstream LPT stages. All debris was contained within the engine
casings.
    Preliminary findings show that the ISS fin had rubbed into the
stage 2 vane honeycomb seal, which overheated and cracked, finally
resulting in releasing a portion of the ISS area of the disc.
    This condition, if not detected and corrected, could lead to LPT
stage 2 disc cracks, possibly resulting in an uncontained engine
failure and subsequent damage to the aeroplane.

We are issuing this AD to prevent cracks in the LPT disks, which could
result in uncontained engine failure and damage to the airplane. You
may obtain further information by examining the MCAI in the AD docket.

Relevant Service Information

    RR has issued Repeater Technical Variance 125060, Issue 1, dated
July 27, 2012; Repeater Technical Variance 125658, Issue 2, dated
August 14, 2012; Alert Non-Modification Service Bulletin (NMSB) RB.211-
72-AH054, Initial issue, dated September 14, 2012; and Alert NMSB
RB.211-72-AH054, Revision 1, dated November 5, 2012. The actions
described in this service information are intended to correct the
unsafe condition identified in the MCAI.

FAA's Determination and Requirements of This AD

    This product has been approved by the United Kingdom and is
approved for operation in the United States. Pursuant to our bilateral
agreement with the European Community, they have notified us of the
unsafe condition described in the MCAI and service information
referenced above. We are issuing this AD because we evaluated all
information provided by EASA and determined the unsafe condition exists
and is likely to exist or develop on other products of the same type
design. This AD requires on-wing inspections of LPT disk seal fins and
interstage seals when post-flight review of the EHM low-pressure rotor
(N1) vibration data indicates maintenance-alert limits were exceeded in
flight. The AD also requires in-shop inspections of the LPT disk seal
fins and interstage seals to detect cracks or damage and, depending on
the findings, the accomplishment of corrective action.

FAA's Determination of the Effective Date

    No domestic operators use this product. Therefore, we find that
notice and opportunity for prior public comment are unnecessary and
that good cause exists for making this amendment effective in less than
30 days.

Comments Invited

    This AD is a final rule that involves requirements affecting flight
safety, and we did not precede it by notice and opportunity for public
comment. We invite you to send any written relevant data, views, or
arguments about this AD. Send your comments to an address listed under
the ADDRESSES section. Include ``Docket No. FAA-2013-0030; Directorate
Identifier 2012-NE-42-AD'' at the beginning of your comments. We
specifically invite comments on the overall regulatory, economic,
environmental, and energy aspects of this AD. We will consider all
comments received by the closing date and may amend this AD because of
those comments.
    We will post all comments we receive, without change, to http://www.regulations.gov, including any personal information you provide. We
will also post a report summarizing each substantive verbal contact
with FAA personnel concerning this AD. Using the search function of the
Web site, anyone can find and read the comments in any of our dockets,
including, if provided, the name of the individual who sent the comment
(or signed the comment on behalf of an association, business, labor
union, etc.). You may review the DOT's complete Privacy Act Statement
in the Federal Register published on April 11, 2000 (65 FR 19477-78).

Authority for This Rulemaking

    Title 49 of the United States Code specifies the FAA's authority to
issue rules on aviation safety. Subtitle I, section 106, describes the
authority of the FAA Administrator. ``Subtitle VII: Aviation
Programs,'' describes in more detail the scope of the Agency's
authority.
    We are issuing this rulemaking under the authority described in
``Subtitle VII, Part A, Subpart III, Section 44701: General
requirements.'' Under that section, Congress charges the FAA with
promoting safe flight of civil aircraft in air commerce by prescribing
regulations for practices, methods, and procedures the Administrator
finds necessary for safety in air commerce. This regulation is within
the scope of that authority because it addresses an unsafe condition
that is likely to exist or develop on products identified in this
rulemaking action.

Regulatory Findings

    We determined that this AD will not have federalism implications
under Executive Order 13132. This AD will not have a substantial direct
effect on the States, on the relationship between the national
government and the States, or on the distribution of power and
responsibilities among the various levels of government.
    For the reasons discussed above, I certify this AD:
    1. Is not a ``significant regulatory action'' under Executive Order
12866;
    2. Is not a ``significant rule'' under the DOT Regulatory Policies
and Procedures (44 FR 11034, February 26, 1979); and
    3. Will not have a significant economic impact, positive or
negative, on a substantial number of small entities under the criteria
of the Regulatory Flexibility Act.
    We prepared a regulatory evaluation of the estimated costs to
comply with this AD and placed it in the AD docket.

List of Subjects in 14 CFR Part 39

    Air transportation, Aircraft, Aviation safety, Incorporation by
reference, Safety.

Adoption of the Amendment

    Accordingly, under the authority delegated to me by the
Administrator, the FAA amends 14 CFR part 39 as follows:

PART 39--AIRWORTHINESS DIRECTIVES

0
1. The authority citation for part 39 continues to read as follows:

    Authority:  49 U.S.C. 106(g), 40113, 44701.

Sec.  39.13  [Amended]

0
2. The FAA amends Sec.  39.13 by adding the following new AD:

2013-02-04 Rolls-Royce plc: Amendment 39-17325; Docket No. FAA-2013-
0030; Directorate Identifier 2012-NE-42-AD.

(a) Effective Date

    This airworthiness directive (AD) becomes effective February 14,
2013.

(b) Affected ADs

    None.

(c) Applicability

    This AD applies to Rolls-Royce plc (RR) RB211-Trent 970-84,
RB211-Trent 970B-84,

RB211-Trent 972-84, RB211-Trent 972B-84, RB211-Trent 977-84, RB211-
Trent 977B-84, and RB211-Trent 980-84 engines, all serial numbers.

(d) Reason

    This AD was prompted by a Trent 900 engine experiencing low-
pressure turbine (LPT) stage 2 disk interstage seal material loss
and increased low-pressure rotor vibration while in flight. We are
issuing this AD to prevent cracks in the LPT disk, which could
result in uncontained engine failure and damage to the airplane.

(e) Actions and Compliance

    Unless already done, do the following.
    (1) After every flight after the effective date of this AD,
review the Engine Health Monitoring (EHM) low-pressure rotor (N1)
vibration data. If you find that the maximum and average vibrations
exceed 0.7 inches/sec (ips) and 0.5 ips, respectively, then within
10 engine flight cycles, confirm that the vibration data was not the
result of indicator error.
    (2) If you cannot show that the vibration increase was caused by
indicator error, inspect the LPT disk seal fins and interstage
seals. Use RR Repeater Technical Variance 125060, Issue 1, dated
July 27, 2012, to do the inspections.
    (3) After the effective date of this AD, at each engine shop
visit inspect the LPT disk seal fins and interstage seals. Use RR
Alert Non-Modification Service Bulletin RB.211-72-AH054, Revision 1,
dated November 5, 2012, or Initial Issue, dated September 14, 2012,
to do the inspections.
    (4) If, during the inspection required by paragraphs (e)(2) or
(e)(3) of this AD, you find any cracks in the disk seal fins or that
the interstage seals are missing seal material, replace the parts
with hardware eligible for installation before returning the engine
to service.

(f) Definitions

    For the purposes of this AD, a shop visit is defined as whenever
engine maintenance performed prior to reinstallation requires one of
the following:
    (1) Separation of a pair of major mating engine module flanges.
However, separation of flanges solely for the purpose of shipment
without subsequent internal maintenance is not a shop visit.
Separation of the external gearbox engine mating flanges or removal
of the external gearbox is also not classified as a shop visit.
    (2) Removal of a disk, hub, or spool.

(g) Credit for Previous Actions

    If you took corrective action before the effective date of this
AD in accordance with RR Repeater Technical Variance 125658, Issue
2, dated August 14, 2012, for detected excessive vibration, you met
the inspection requirements of this AD.

(h) Alternative Methods of Compliance (AMOCs)

    The Manager, Engine Certification Office, may approve AMOCs for
this AD. Use the procedures found in 14 CFR 39.19 to make your
request.

(i) Related Information

    (1) For more information about this AD, contact Robert Green,
Aerospace Engineer, Engine Certification Office, FAA, Engine &
Propeller Directorate, 12 New England Executive Park, Burlington, MA
01803; phone:<PHONE_NUMBER>; fax:<PHONE_NUMBER>; email:
<EMAIL_ADDRESS>    (2) Refer to MCAI European Aviation Safety Agency AD 2012-0220,
dated October 22, 2012.

(j) Material Incorporated by Reference

    (1) The Director of the Federal Register approved the
incorporation by reference (IBR) of the service information listed
in this paragraph under 5 U.S.C. 552(a) and 1 CFR part 51.
    (2) You must use this service information as applicable to do
the actions required by this AD, unless the AD specifies otherwise.
    (i) Rolls-Royce plc (RR) Non-Modification Service Bulletin
(NMSB) RB.211-72-AH054, Initial Issue, dated September 14, 2012.
    (ii) RR NMSB RB.211-72-AH054, Revision 1, dated November 5,
2012.
    (iii) RR Repeater Technical Variance 125060, Issue 1, dated July
27, 2012.
    (3) For service information identified in this AD, contact
Rolls-Royce plc, Corporate Communications, P.O. Box 31, Derby,
England, DE248BJ; phone: 011-44-1332-242424; fax: 011-44-1332-
245418, or email: http://www.rolls-royce.com/contact/civil_team.jsp.
    (4) You may view this service information at FAA, FAA, Engine &
Propeller Directorate, 12 New England Executive Park, Burlington,
MA. For information on the availability of this material at the FAA,
call<PHONE_NUMBER>.
    (5) You may view this service information at the National
Archives and Records Administration (NARA). For information on the
availability of this material at NARA, call<PHONE_NUMBER>, or go to:
http://www.archives.gov/federal-register/cfr/ibr-locations.html.

    Issued in Burlington, Massachusetts, on January 15, 2013.
Thomas A. Boudreau,
Acting Manager, Engine & Propeller Directorate, Aircraft Certification
Service.
[FR Doc. 2013-01361 Filed 1-29-13; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910-13-P


<!DOCTYPE HTML PUBLIC "-//-//W3C//DTD HTML 3.2//EN">

<META name="generator" content="PDFCreactiveX HTML Export">
<META name="creation-date" content="24/04/2008 04:48:28 ">
<TITLE></TITLE>


[Federal Register: July 14, 2008 (Volume 73, Number 135)]
[Notices]
[Page 40400-40403]
[DOCID:fr14jy08-130]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

[Release No. 34-58110; File No. SR-BSE-2008-34]

Self-Regulatory Organizations; Boston Stock Exchange, Inc.;
Notice of Filing and Immediate Effectiveness of a Proposed Rule Change
to Permit the Listing and Trading of Options on Foreign Currency ETFs
and Commodity Pool ETFs

July 7, 2008.
    Pursuant to section 19(b)(1) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934
(``Act'') \1\ and Rule 19b-4 thereunder,\2\ notice is hereby given that
on June 27, 2008, the Boston Stock Exchange, Inc. (``BSE'' or
``Exchange'') filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission
(``Commission'') the proposed rule change as described in Items I and
II below, which Items have been substantially prepared by the Exchange.
The Exchange filed the proposed rule change as a ``non-controversial''
proposed rule change pursuant to section 19(b)(3)(A) of the Act \3\ and
Rule 19b-4(f)(6) thereunder,\4\ which renders the proposal effective
upon filing with the Commission. The Commission is publishing this
notice to solicit comments on the proposed rule change from interested
persons.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \1\ 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(1).
    \2\ 17 CFR 240.19b-4.
    \3\ 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(3)(A).
    \4\ 17 CFR 240.19b-4(f)(6).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

I. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement of the Terms of Substance
of the Proposed Rule Change

    The Exchange proposes to amend certain rules of the Boston Options
Exchange (``BOX'') to permit the listing and trading of options on: (1)
Shares of exchange-traded funds (``ETFs'') that hold specified non-U.S.
currency options, futures, or options on futures on such currency, or
any other derivatives based on such currency (referred collectively
herein as ``Foreign Currency ETFs''); and (2) trust-issued receipts
(``TIRs''), partnership units, and securities issued by other entities
that hold or invest in commodity futures products (referred
collectively herein as ``Commodity Pool ETFs'').
    The text of the proposed rule change is available at the principal
office of the Exchange, the Commission's Public Reference Room, and
http://www.bostonstock.com.

II. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement of the Purpose of, and
Statutory Basis for, the Proposed Rule Change

    In its filing with the Commission, the Exchange included statements
concerning the purpose of, and basis for, the proposed rule change and
discussed any comments it received on the proposed rule change. The
text of these statements may be examined at the places specified in
Item IV below. BSE has prepared summaries, set forth in sections A, B,
and C below, of the most significant aspects of such statements.

A. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement of the Purpose of, and
Statutory Basis for, the Proposed Rule Change

1. Purpose
    The purpose of the proposed rule change is to enable the listing
and trading on BOX of options on Foreign Currency ETFs and Commodity
Pool ETFs. Currently, section 3(i) of Chapter IV of the BOX Rules
provides that securities deemed appropriate for options trading shall
include shares or other securities (``Exchange-Traded Fund Shares'')
that are traded on a national securities exchange and represent
interests in registered investment companies, unit investment trusts,
or similar entities that hold portfolios of securities and/or financial
instruments, including, but not limited to, stock index futures
contracts, options on futures, options on securities and indexes,
equity caps, collars and floors, swap agreements, forward contracts,
repurchase agreements, and reverse repurchase agreements (``Financial
Instruments''), and money market instruments, including but not limited
to U.S. government securities and repurchase agreements (the ``Money
Market Instruments''), comprising or otherwise based on or representing
investments in broad-based indexes or portfolios of securities and/or
Financial Instruments and Money Market Instruments (or that hold
securities in one or more other registered investment companies that
themselves hold such portfolios of securities and/or Financial
Instruments and Money Market Instruments).
    The Exchange proposes to amend section 3(i) of Chapter IV of the
BOX Rules to expand the types of options listed and traded on BOX to
include options on:
     Trusts that hold a specified non-U.S. currency or
currencies deposited which when aggregated in some specified minimum
number may be surrendered to the trust by the beneficial owner to
receive the specified non-U.S. currency or currencies and pays the
beneficial owner interest and other distributions on the deposited non-
U.S. currency or currencies, if any, declared and paid by the trust;
and
     Shares issued by an entity holding commodity pool
interests principally engaged, directly or indirectly, in holding and/
or managing portfolios or baskets of securities, commodity futures
contracts, options on commodity futures contracts, swaps, forward
contracts, and/or options on physical commodities and/or non-U.S.
currency.

In particular, the proposed amendment to section 3(i) of Chapter IV
would permit the Exchange to list options on the CurrencyShares Euro
Trust (``Trust'') \5\ which issues Euro CurrencyShares (``Shares'') \6\
and other similarly structured currency-based products.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \5\ Rydex Specialized Products LLC, d/b/a ``Rydex Investments,''
is the sponsor of the Trust (``Sponsor'') and may be deemed the
``issuer'' of the Shares pursuant to Section 2(a)(4) of the
Securities Act of 1933. The Bank of New York is the trustee of the
Trust (``Trustee''); JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A., London Branch, is
the depository for the Trust (``Depository''); and Rydex
Distributors, Inc. is the distributor for the Trust
(``Distributor''). The Trust intends to issue additional Shares on a
continuous basis through the Trustee.
    \6\ The Shares are listed and trade on NYSE Arca under the
symbol ``FXE.'' The Shares may also trade in other markets.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    The investment objective of Foreign Currency ETFs is for the shares
of a particular fund to reflect the price of the particular foreign
currency held therein. They are intended to provide institutional and
retail investors with a simple, cost-effective means of gaining
investment benefits similar to those of holding the particular foreign
currency whose value is reflected.
    Additionally, the proposed amendment to section 3(i) of Chapter IV
would permit the Exchange to list options on Commodity Pool ETFs.
Commodity Pool ETFs may hold or trade in one or more types of
investments that may include any combination of securities, commodity
futures contracts, options on commodity futures contracts, swaps, and
forward contracts. Proposed section 3(i) of Chapter IV of the BOX Rules
sets forth that for BOX to list an option on a Commodity Pool ETF, the
Commodity Pool ETF must be traded on a national securities exchange and
defined as an ``NMS stock'' under Rule 600 of Regulation NMS.
    The Exchange believes that permitting options on Foreign Currency
ETFs and Commodity Pool ETFs to be traded on BOX is consistent with the
Commission's approvals of rule changes filed by the International
Securities Exchange (``ISE'') and NYSE Arca to list and trade shares of
the Trust and similarly structured currency-based products.\7\ This
rule change to BOX's listing criteria for ETFs is intended to provide
appropriate listing standards and is necessary to enable the Exchange
to list and trade options shares of Foreign Currency ETFs and Commodity
Pool ETFs that are now listed or may be listed in the future.\8\ The
Exchange believes that it is reasonable to expect other types of
Foreign Currency ETFs and Commodity Pool ETFs to be introduced for
trading in the near future. The proposed amendment to the Exchange's
listing criteria for options on Foreign Currency ETFs and Commodity
Pool ETFs are necessary to ensure that the Exchange will be able to
list options on existing Foreign Currency ETFs and Commodity Pool ETFs
as well as any other similar ETFs that may be listed and traded in the
future.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \7\ See Securities Exchange Act Release Nos. 54087 (June 30,
2006), 71 FR 38918 (July 10, 2006) (SR-ISE-2005-60) (approving the
listing and trading of options on ETFs that hold specified non-U.S.
currency); 54730 (November 9, 2006), 71 FR 66999 (November 17, 2006)
(SR-NYSEArca-2006-04) (approving the listing and trading of options
on ETFs that hold specified non-U.S. currency); 55635 (April 16,
2007), 72 FR 19999 (April 20, 2007) (SR-ISE-2007-16) (approving the
listing and trading of options on Commodity Pool ETFs); and 56073
(July 13, 2007) 72 FR 39654 (July 19, 2007) (SR-NYSEArca-2007-53)
(approving the listing and trading of options on Commodity Pool
ETFs).
    \8\ See, e.g., Securities Exchange Act Release Nos. 53105
(January 11, 2006), 71 FR 3129 (SR-Amex-2005-59) (January 19, 2006)
(approving the listing and trading of the DB Commodity Index
Tracking Fund); 53582 (March 31, 2006), 71 FR 17510 (SR-Amex-2005-
127) (April 6, 2006) (approving the listing and trading of Units of
the United States Oil Fund, L.P.); and 54450 (September 14, 2006),
71 FR 51245 (September 21, 2006) (SR-Amex-2006-44) (approving the
listing and trading of the PowerShares DB G10 Currency Harvest
Fund).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    ETFs on which BOX-listed options are based have to satisfy the
listing standards in section 3(i) of Chapter IV of the BOX Rules.
Specifically, the Exchange-Traded Fund Shares must be traded on a
national securities exchange or through the facilities of a national
securities association and must be an ``NMS stock'' as defined under
Rule 600 of Regulation NMS. The ETF must also either: (1) Meet the
criteria and guidelines under sections 3(a) and 3(b) of Chapter IV
(Criteria for Underlying Securities); or (2) be available for creation
or redemption each business day from and through the issuer in cash or
in-kind at a price related to net asset value. In addition, the trust,
commodity pool, or other similar entity shall provide that shares may
be created even if some or all of the investment assets and/or cash
required to be deposited have not been received by the issuer, subject
to the condition that the person obligated to deposit the investment
assets has undertaken to deliver the shares as soon as possible and
such undertaking has been secured by the delivery and maintenance of
collateral consisting of cash or cash equivalents satisfactory to the
issuer.
    Under the applicable continued listing criteria in section 4(h) of
Chapter IV of the BOX Rules, ETF options approved for trading would not
be deemed to meet the requirements for continued approval, and Boston
Options Exchange Regulation (``BOXR'') would not open for trading any
additional series of options contracts of the class covering such ETF
in any of the following circumstances:
     The ETF is halted from trading on its primary market;
     The ETF is delisted in accordance with the terms of
Section 4(b)(vi) of Chapter IV of the BOX Rules;
     Following the initial 12-month period beginning upon the
commencement of trading of the ETF, there are fewer than 50 record and/
or beneficial holders of such ETF for 30 or more consecutive trading
days;
     The value of the index or portfolio of securities or non-
U.S. currency, portfolio of commodities including commodity futures
contracts, options on commodity futures contracts, swaps, forward
contracts and/or options on physical commodities and/or Financial
Instruments and Money Market Instruments on which the ETF is based is
no longer calculated or available; or
     Such other event occurs or condition exists that in the
opinion of BOXR makes further dealing of the options on BOX
inadvisable.
    As part of this revision, the Exchange proposes to add paragraphs
(i)(B)(iv) and (i)(B)(v) to section 3 of Chapter IV of the BOX Rules to
require that, for Foreign Currency ETFs and Commodity Pool ETFs, a
comprehensive surveillance sharing agreement be in place with the
marketplace(s) with last-sale reporting that represent the highest
volume in the underlying derivatives. Such derivatives consist of
options or futures on the specified non-U.S. currency, commodity
futures contracts, and/or options on commodity futures contracts on the
specified commodities or non-U.S. currency, which are utilized by the
national securities exchange where the underlying Foreign Currency ETFs
and Commodity Pool ETFs are listed and traded.
    The Exchange represents that it has an adequate surveillance
program in place for options based on Foreign Currency ETFs and
Commodity Pool ETFs, and intends to apply those same program procedures
that it applies to ETF options currently traded on BOX. In addition,
BOX may obtain trading information via the Intermarket Surveillance
Group (``ISG'') from other exchanges who are members or affiliates of
the ISG.\9\ The Exchange represents that prior to listing and trading
options on Foreign Currency ETFs and Commodity Pool ETFs, it will have
the ability to obtain specific trading

information either via ISG or from the exchange or exchanges where the
particular underlying non-U.S. currency futures and/or options and
commodity futures and/or options on commodity futures are traded.\10\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \9\ For a list of current members and affiliate members of the
ISG, see http://www.isgportal.com.
    \10\ E-mail from Maura Looney, Associate Vice President
Regulation and Enforcement, Exchange, to Michou H.M. Nguyen, Special
Counsel, Division of Trading and Markets, Commission, on July 7,
2008 (correcting drafting error in purpose section of Form 19b-4).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    The Exchange is also proposing to amend section 4(a) of Chapter III
of the BOX Rules to require each Options Participant to establish,
maintain, and enforce written policies and procedures to prevent the
misuse of material nonpublic information it might have or receive
regarding applicable non-U.S. currency; non-U.S. currency options,
futures, or options on futures on such currency; or any other
derivatives on such currency, option, or derivative, or regarding the
applicable related commodity, commodity futures, options on commodity
futures, or any other related commodity derivatives.
    The Exchange is further proposing to amend section 7 of Chapter VI
and Section 1 of Chapter VIII of the BOX Rules to ensure that market
makers handling options on ETFs provide BOXR with all necessary
information relating to their trading in the applicable non-U.S.
currency; non-U.S. currency options, futures, or options on futures on
such currency; any other derivatives based on such currency; physical
commodities; physical commodity options; and commodity futures
contracts, options on commodity futures contracts, or any other
derivatives based on such commodity, and that all such trading occurs
in an account which has been reported to BOXR.
    Finally, the Exchange represents that the addition of options on
Foreign Currency ETFs and Commodity Pool ETFs would not have any effect
on the rules pertaining to position and exercise limits \11\ or
margin.\12\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \11\ See Section 7 and Section 9 of Chapter III of the BOX
Rules.
    \12\ See Section 3 of Chapter XIII of the BOX Rules.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

2. Statutory Basis
    The Exchange believes that the proposed rule change is consistent
with section 6(b) of the Act,\13\ in general, and furthers the
objectives of section 6(b)(5) of the Act,\14\ in particular, in that it
is designed to promote just and equitable principles of trade, to
prevent fraudulent and manipulative acts, and to remove impediments to
and perfect the mechanism of a free and open market and a national
market system.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \13\ 15 U.S.C. 78f(b).
    \14\ 15 U.S.C. 78f(b)(5).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    The Exchange believes that amending the BOX rules to accommodate
the listing and trading of options on Foreign Currency ETFs and
Commodity Pool ETFs would provide investors with greater risk
management tools and, in general, would allow for the protection of
investors and the public interest.

B. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement on Burden on Competition

    The Exchange does not believe that the proposed rule change would
impose any burden on competition that is not necessary or appropriate
in furtherance of the purposes of the Act.

C. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement on Comments on the Proposed
Rule Change Received From Members, Participants, or Others

    The Exchange has neither solicited nor received written comments on
the proposed rule change.

III. Date of Effectiveness of the Proposed Rule Change and Timing for
Commission Action

    Because the proposed rule change does not: (i) Significantly affect
the protection of investors or the public interest; (ii) impose any
significant burden on competition; and (iii) become operative for 30
days after the date of filing (or such shorter time as the Commission
may designate if consistent with the protection of investors and the
public interest), the proposed rule change has become effective
pursuant to section 19(b)(3)(A) of the Act \15\ and subparagraph (f)(6)
of Rule 19b-4 thereunder.\16\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \15\ 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(3)(A).
    \16\ 17 CFR 240.19b-4(f)(6). The Exchange has satisfied the
five-day pre-filing requirement of Rule 19b-4(f)(6)(iii).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    The Exchange has requested that the Commission waive the 30-day
operative delay and designate the proposed rule change as operative
upon filing. The Commission believes that waiving the 30-day operative
delay is consistent with the protection of investors and the public
interest. The proposed rule change is substantially similar to those of
other options exchanges that have been previously approved by the
Commission \17\ and does not appear to present any novel regulatory
issues. Therefore, the Commission designates the proposal operative
upon filing.\18\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \17\ See Securities Exchange Act Release Nos. 54087 (June 30,
2006), 71 FR 38918 (July 10, 2006) (SR-ISE-2005-60) and 54983
(December 20, 2006), 71 FR 78476 (December 29, 2006)( SR-Amex-2006-
87) (approving the listing and trading of options on Foreign
Currency ETFs); Securities Exchange Act Release Nos. 55547 (March
28, 2007) 72 FR 16388 (April 4, 2007) (SR-AMEX-2006-110) and 55635
(April 16, 2007) 72 FR 19999 (April 20, 2007) (SR-ISE-2007-16)
(approving the listing and trading of options on Commodity Pool
ETFs).
    \18\ For purposes only of waiving the operative delay of this
proposal, the Commission has considered the proposed rule's impact
on efficiency, competition, and capital formation. See 15 U.S.C.
78c(f).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    At any time within 60 days of the filing of the proposed rule
change, the Commission may summarily abrogate such rule change if it
appears to the Commission that such action is necessary or appropriate
in the public interest, for the protection of investors, or otherwise
in the furtherance of the purposes of the Act.

IV. Solicitation of Comments

    Interested persons are invited to submit written data, views, and
arguments concerning the foregoing, including whether the proposed rule
change is consistent with the Act. Comments may be submitted by any of
the following methods:

Electronic Comments

     Use the Commission's Internet comment form (http://
www.sec.gov/rules/sro.shtml); or
     Send an e-mail to<EMAIL_ADDRESS>Please include
File Number SR-BSE-2008-34 on the subject line.

Paper Comments

     Send paper comments in triplicate to Secretary, Securities
and Exchange Commission, 100 F Street, NE., Washington, DC 20549-1090.

All submissions should refer to File Number SR-BSE-2008-34. This file
number should be included on the subject line if e-mail is used. To
help the Commission process and review your comments more efficiently,
please use only one method. The Commission will post all comments on
the Commission's Internet Web site (http://www.sec.gov/rules/
sro.shtml). Copies of the submission, all subsequent amendments, all
written statements with respect to the proposed rule change that are
filed with the Commission, and all written communications relating to
the proposed rule change between the Commission and any person, other
than those that may be withheld from the public in accordance with the
provisions of 5 U.S.C. 552, will be available for inspection and
copying in the Commission's Public Reference Room, 100 F Street, NE.,
Washington, DC 20549, on official business days between the hours of 10
a.m. and 3p.m. Copies of such filing also will be available for
inspection and copying at

the principal office of the Exchange. All comments received will be
posted without change; the Commission does not edit personal
identifying information from submissions. You should submit only
information that you wish to make available publicly. All submissions
should refer to File Number SR-BSE-2008-34 and should be submitted on
or before August 4, 2008.

    For the Commission, by the Division of Trading and Markets,
pursuant to delegated authority.\19\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \19\ 17 CFR 200.30-3(a)(12).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

Florence E. Harmon,
Acting Secretary.
[FR Doc. E8-15886 Filed 7-11-08; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 8010-01-P