Missouri Department of Health and Senior Services P. O. Box 570, Jefferson City, MO 65102 0570 Phone: 573 751 6400 FAX: 573 751 6010 RELAY MISSOURI for Hearing and Speech Impaired 1 800 735 2966 VOICE 1 800 735 2466 Richard C. Dunn Director Bob Holden Governor www. dhss. state. mo. us The Missouri Department of Health and Senior Services protects and promotes quality of life and health for all Missourians by developing and implementing programs and systems that provide: information and education, effective regulation and oversight, quality services, and surveillance of diseases and conditions.

AN EQUAL OPPORTUNITY / AFFIRMATIVE ACTION EMPLOYER: Services provided on a nondiscriminatory basis. Coded Landlord/ Agent Identification: _________________

RESIDENTAL LEAD BASED PAINT DISCLOSURE RULE SITE VISIT CHECKLIST Interviewing the Landlord/ Agent ( Check one box for each question) Yes No 1. Are you familiar with the lead based paint Disclosure Rule?

2. Do you provide the pamphlet " Protect Your Family from Lead in Your Home" to tenants before they sign a lease?

3. Do you have any letters, records, or reports regarding lead based paint inspections?

If yes, did you give the tenant a copy of such documents? 4. What would you consider the best way to provide outreach and education to landlords in the St. Louis area?

5. How would you improve the " Disclosure Rule" handouts to make them easier or more understandable to a landlord and/ or tenant?

Reviewing Landlord/ Agent Records ( Check one box for each question) Yes No 1. Does the lease agreement include the " lead warning statement"? Housing built before 1978 may contain lead based paint. Lead from paint, paint chips and dust can pose health hazards if not managed properly. Lead exposure is especially harmful to young children and pregnant women. Before renting pre 1978 housing, lessors must disclose the presence of lead based paint and/ or lead based paint hazards in the dwelling. Lessees must also receive a federally approved pamphlet on lead poisoning prevention.

2. Does the file include a lead based paint disclosure form or section of the lease?

If no, is the landlord aware that he must provide these upon lease?

3. Are there records that indicate a lead based paint inspection?

If yes, were these records disclosed to the tenant?

Are the records listed in the disclosure section?

4. Did the tenant acknowledge, by dated initial or signature, receipt of: a) Pamphlet?

b) Reports of lead based paint inspections and results?

c) Disclosure form?

5. Was disclosure form signed and dated by landlord and/ or agent? Missouri Department of Health and Senior Services P. O. Box 570, Jefferson City, MO 65102 0570 Phone: 573 751 6400 FAX: 573 751 6010 RELAY MISSOURI for Hearing and Speech Impaired 1 800 735 2966 VOICE 1 800 735 2466 Richard C. Dunn Director Bob Holden Governor www. dhss. state. mo. us The Missouri Department of Health and Senior Services protects and promotes quality of life and health for all Missourians by developing and implementing programs and systems that provide: information and education, effective regulation and oversight, quality services, and surveillance of diseases and conditions.

AN EQUAL OPPORTUNITY / AFFIRMATIVE ACTION EMPLOYER: Services provided on a nondiscriminatory basis. Coded Tenant Identification: _________________

RESIDENTAL LEAD BASED PAINT DISCLOSURE RULE SITE VISIT CHECKLIST Interviewing the Tenant/ Lessee ( Check one box for each question) Yes No N/ A 1. Did you receive the " Protect Your Family from Lead in Your Home" pamphlet from your landlord before signing the lease?

1. Did you read the pamphlet upon receipt?

3. Did you make any changes as described in the pamphlet?

4. If no changes have been made, why? ( ex. no money, or time, no supplies, no perceived risk, no lead hazards at property).

5. What have you learned from the educational information that you received?

6. Do you have any suggestions for improving the educational information that you received?

7. Where do you hear most of your information about lead poisoning?

8. Has your child received a blood lead test within the past year? ( note: This is not a required answer) If not, please refer family to the Health Department or their Health care Provider.


[Federal Register: April 18, 2006 (Volume 71, Number 74)]
[Notices]
[Page 19883-19884]
[DOCID:fr18ap06-55]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission

[Project No. 2503-085--South Carolina]

Duke Power, a Division of Duke Energy Corporation; Notice of
Availability of Environmental Assessment

April 11, 2006.
    In accordance with the National Environmental Policy Act of 1969
and the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission's (Commission)
regulations, 18 CFR part 380 (Order No. 486, 52 FR 47897), the Office
of Energy Projects has reviewed an application for non-project use of
project lands and waters at the Keowee-Toxaway Hydroelectric Project
(FERC No. 2503), and has prepared an environmental assessment (EA) for
the proposed non-project use. Duke Power is the licensee for the
project. The project is located on the Little and Keowee Rivers in
Oconee County, South Carolina.
    In the application, Duke Power requests Commission authorization to
lease to the Waterford Communities

Owners Association and Crescent Communities S.C., LLC 6.54 acres of
project land for a commercial/residential marina. The proposed marina
would consist of: (1) Three cluster docks with eight boat docking
locations each, and one cluster dock with six boat docking locations
for Waterford Ridge; (2) one cluster dock with fourteen boat docking
locations, and two cluster docks with eight boat docking locations each
for Waterford Farms; and (3) nine cluster docks with ten boat docking
locations each for Waterford Pointe. The marina's docks would provide a
total of 150 boat docking locations for the residents of the Waterford
Communities. The EA contains the Commission staff's analysis of the
probable environmental impacts of the proposal, and concludes that
approving the licensee's application, with staff's recommended
environmental measures, would not constitute a major Federal action
significantly affecting the quality of the human environment.
    The EA is attached to a Commission order titled ``Order Modifying
and Approving Non-Project Use of Project Lands and Waters,'' which was
issued April 7, 2006, and is available for review and reproduction at
the Commission's Public Reference Room, located at 888 First Street,
NE., Room 2A, Washington, DC 20426. The EA may also be viewed on the
Commission's Web site at http://www.ferc.gov using the ``elibrary''

link. Enter the dock number (prefaced by P-), excluding the last three
digits, in the docket number field to access the document. For
assistance, contact FERC Online Support at<EMAIL_ADDRESS>or toll-free at<PHONE_NUMBER>, or for TTY, contact<PHONE_NUMBER>.

Magalie R. Salas,
Secretary.
 [FR Doc. E6-5731 Filed 4-17-06; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 6717-01-P


[Federal Register Volume 77, Number 75 (Wednesday, April 18, 2012)]
[Notices]
[Pages 23298-23300]
[FR Doc No: 2012-9287]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

[Release No. 34-66795; File No. SR-NYSEAmex-2012-21]

Self-Regulatory Organizations; NYSE Amex LLC; Notice of Filing
and Immediate Effectiveness of Proposed Rule Change To Adopt Recent
Changes to FINRA Rules 7440 and 7450, and To Adopt Recent Changes to
FINRA Rule 5320 by Amending Supplementary Material .02 to NYSE Amex
Equities Rule 5320 To Require that Member Organizations Report to the
Order Audit Trail System Information Barriers Put Into Place by the
Member Organization in Reliance on Supplementary Material .02 to NYSE
Amex Equities Rule 5320

April 12, 2012.
    Pursuant to Section 19(b)(1) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934
(``Act'') \1\ and Rule 19b-4 thereunder,\2\ notice is hereby given that
on April 2, 2012, NYSE Amex LLC (``Exchange'' or ``NYSE Amex'') filed
with the Securities and Exchange Commission (``Commission'') the
proposed rule change as described in Items I and II below, which Items
have been prepared by the Exchange. The Commission is publishing this
notice to solicit comments on the proposed rule change from interested
persons.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \1\ 15 U.S.C.78s(b)(1).
    \2\ 17 CFR 240.19b-4.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

I. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement of the Terms of Substance
of the Proposed Rule Change

    The Exchange proposes (i) to adopt recent changes to Financial
Industry Regulatory Authority, Inc. (``FINRA'') Rules 7440 and 7450,
which the Exchange has incorporated by reference in its own rules, and
(ii) adopt recent changes to FINRA Rule 5320 by amending Supplementary
Material .02 to NYSE Amex Equities Rule 5320 to require that member
organizations report to the Order Audit Trail System (``OATS'')
information barriers put into place by the member organization in
reliance on Supplementary Material .02 to NYSE Amex Equities Rule 5320.
The text of the proposed rule change is available at the Exchange, the
Commission's Public Reference Room, the Commission's Web site at
www.sec.gov, and www.nyse.com.

II. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement of the Purpose of, and
Statutory Basis for, the Proposed Rule Change

    In its filing with the Commission, the self-regulatory organization
included statements concerning the purpose of, and basis for, the
proposed rule change and discussed any comments it received on the
proposed rule change. The text of those statements may be examined at
the places specified in Item IV below. The Exchange has prepared
summaries, set forth in sections A, B, and C below, of the most
significant parts of such statements.

A. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement of the Purpose of, and
Statutory Basis for, the Proposed Rule Change

1. Purpose
    The Exchange proposes to (i) adopt recent changes to FINRA Rules
7440 and 7450, which the Exchange has incorporated by reference in its
own rules, and (ii) adopt recent changes to FINRA Rule 5320 by amending
Supplementary Material .02 to NYSE Amex Equities Rule 5320 to require
that member organizations report to OATS information barriers put into
place by the member organizations in reliance on Supplementary Material
.02 to NYSE Amex Equities Rule 5320.\3\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \3\ The Exchange's affiliate, the New York Stock Exchange LLC,
has filed a substantially similar rule filing. See SR-NYSE-2012-09
filed April 2, 2012.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    FINRA recently received Commission approval of changes to the order
recording and transmission requirements of the OATS rules in FINRA
Rules 7440 and 7450.\4\ First, FINRA amended FINRA Rule 7440 to require
FINRA members relying on the no-knowledge exception in Supplementary
Material .02 to FINRA Rule 5320 (Prohibition Against Trading Ahead of
Customer Orders) to report information to OATS regarding the
information barriers adopted by the member in reliance on the
exception--FINRA also added this requirement under Supplementary
Material .02 to FINRA Rule 5320. Second, FINRA amended FINRA Rule 7440
to extend, to all OATS-eligible securities, the existing requirement to
reflect on OATS reports a customer's instruction regarding display of
the customer's limit orders--the requirement previously applied only to
limit orders involving NMS stocks. Finally, FINRA amended FINRA Rule
7450 to codify the specific time by which OATS reports must be
transmitted to FINRA.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \4\ See Securities Exchange Act Release No. 66021 (December 21,
2011), 76 FR 81551 (December 28, 2011) (SR-FINRA-2011-63) [sic].
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    The Exchange recently adopted the NYSE Amex Equities Rule 7400
Series, which consists of NYSE Amex Equities Rules 7410 through 7470
and is based substantially on the FINRA Rule 7400 Series.\5\ In this
regard, NYSE Amex Equities Rules 7440 and 7450 incorporate by reference
the order data recording and transmission requirements of FINRA Rules
7440 and 7450, respectively, by requiring member organizations and
associated persons to comply with FINRA Rules 7440 and 7450 as if those
rules were part of the Exchange's rules. Accordingly, the Exchange
hereby proposes to adopt the changes to FINRA Rules 7440 and 7450 that
were approved pursuant to SR-FINRA-2011-063. \6\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \5\ See Securities Exchange Act Release No. 65524 (October 7,
2011), 76 FR 64151 (October 17, 2011) (SR-NYSEAmex-2011-74).
    \6\ The Exchange notes that the approved changes to FINRA Rules
7440 and 7450 that the Exchange proposes to adopt would be
applicable only to Exchange member organization [sic] that are also
FINRA members. In particular, the changes relate to cross-references
to FINRA Rule 5320, and for the Exchange, to NYSE Amex Equities Rule
5320, which is not applicable to Proprietary Trading Firms, as
defined in NYSE Amex Equities Rule 7410(p), because they do not have
customers and therefore do not need to maintain information
barriers.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    The Exchange also recently adopted NYSE Amex Equities Rule 5320,
which is substantially the same as FINRA Rule 5320 and prohibits
trading ahead of customer orders with certain exceptions, including
large order and institutional account exceptions, a no-knowledge
exception, a riskless principal exception, an intermarket sweep order
exception, and odd lot and bona fide error transaction exceptions.\7\
The Exchange hereby proposes to adopt as Supplementary Material .02(b)
to NYSE Amex Equities Rule 5320 the same language that was approved
pursuant to SR-FINRA-2011-063 as Supplementary Material .02(c) to FINRA
Rule 5320.\8\ Specifically, if a member organization implements and
utilizes appropriate information barriers in reliance on the no-
knowledge exception

provided under Supplementary Material .02 to NYSE Amex Equities Rule
5320, the member organization must uniquely identify such information
barriers as prescribed in FINRA Rule 7440(b)(19).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \7\ See Securities Exchange Act Release No. 65165 (August 18,
2011), 76 FR 53009 (August 24, 2011) (SR-NYSEAmex-2011-59).
    \8\ For consistency with Exchange rules, the Exchange proposes
to change references from ``members'' in Supplementary Material
.02(c) to FINRA Rule 5320 to ``member organizations'' in proposed
Supplementary Material .02(b) to NYSE Amex Equities Rule 5320. The
Exchange also proposes to designate the existing text of
Supplementary Material .02 to NYSE Amex Equities Rule 5320 as
paragraph (a) thereto.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    The no-knowledge exception in Supplementary Material .02 to NYSE
Amex Equities Rule 5320 provides that if a member organization
implements and uses an effective system of internal controls--such as
appropriate information barriers--that operate to prevent one trading
unit from obtaining knowledge of customer orders held by a separate
trading unit, that other trading unit may trade in a proprietary
capacity at prices that would satisfy the customer orders held by the
separate, walled-off trading unit. Through the use of OATS, FINRA will
be able to ascertain, on an automated basis, those member organizations
claiming the no-knowledge exception.\9\ This will reduce the potential
for ``false positive'' alerts by allowing FINRA to account for the
existence of information barriers when running automated surveillance
patterns designed to identify inappropriate trading ahead of customer
orders. These new requirements should substantially reduce the number
of ``false positives'' that are identified through automated
surveillance patterns by permitting FINRA to account for information
barriers when trading ahead may otherwise be indicated.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \9\ All Exchange member organizations that are subject to NYSE
Amex Equities Rule 5320 are also FINRA members, and FINRA reviews
compliance with that rule pursuant to an allocation plan under Rule
17d-2 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    The Exchange proposes to implement the changes proposed herein on
the same date that FINRA implements the changes approved pursuant to
SR-FINRA-2011-063, thereby eliminating the potential for different
regulatory requirements between common members.\10\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \10\ FINRA has announced that it will implement the changes on
April 16, 2012. See http://www.finra.org/Industry/Compliance/MarketTransparency/OATS/OATSReport/P125612.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

2. Statutory Basis
    The proposed rule change is consistent with Section 6(b) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (the ``Act''),\11\ in general, and
furthers the objectives of Section 6(b)(5),\12\ in particular, because
it is designed to prevent fraudulent and manipulative acts and
practices, to promote just and equitable principles of trade, to foster
cooperation and coordination with persons engaged in facilitating
transactions in securities, to remove impediments to and perfect the
mechanism of a free and open market and a national market system and,
in general, to protect investors and the public interest. Specifically,
the proposed rule change would remove impediments to and perfect the
mechanism of a free and open market and a national market system by
providing greater harmonization among NYSE Rules, NYSE Amex Equities
rules, and FINRA Rules of similar substance and purpose. This would
result in less burdensome and more efficient regulatory compliance,
which would foster cooperation and coordination with persons engaged in
facilitating transactions in securities and promote the protection of
investors and the public interest. The changes proposed herein are also
designed to prevent fraudulent and manipulative acts and practices and
to promote just and equitable principles of trade by ensuring that
FINRA Rules incorporated by reference in the NYSE Amex Equities Rules
and rules that are common among NYSE, NYSE Amex Equities, and FINRA
remain consistent after amendments to the particular FINRA Rules.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \11\ 15 U.S.C. 78f(b).
    \12\ 15 U.S.C. 78f(b)(5).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

B. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement on Burden on Competition

    The Exchange does not believe that the proposed rule change will
impose any burden on competition that is not necessary or appropriate
in furtherance of the purposes of the Act.

C. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement on Comments on the Proposed
Rule Change Received From Members, Participants, or Others

    No written comments were solicited or received with respect to the
proposed rule change.

III. Date of Effectiveness of the Proposed Rule Change and Timing for
Commission Action

    Because the proposed rule change does not: (i) Significantly affect
the protection of investors or the public interest; (ii) impose any
significant burden on competition; and (iii) become operative prior to
30 days from the date on which it was filed, or such shorter time as
the Commission may designate, if consistent with the protection of
investors and the public interest, the proposed rule change has become
effective pursuant to Section 19(b)(3)(A) of the Act \13\ and Rule 19b-
4(f)(6) thereunder.\14\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \13\ 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(3)(A).
    \14\ 17 CFR 240.19b-4(f)(6). In addition, Rule 19b-4(f)(6)
requires a self-regulatory organization to give the Commission
written notice of its intent to file the proposed rule change at
least five business days prior to the date of filing of the proposed
rule change, or such shorter time as designated by the Commission.
The Exchange has satisfied this requirement.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    A proposed rule change filed pursuant to Rule 19b-4(f)(6) under the
Act \15\ normally does not become operative for 30 days after the date
of its filing. However, Rule 19b-4(f)(6) permits the Commission to
designate a shorter time if such action is consistent with the
protection of investors and the public interest. The Exchange requests
that the Commission waive the 30-day operative delay so that the
proposed rule change may become effective on the same date that FINRA
implements the changes to FINRA Rules 7440, 7450, and 5320.\16\ The
Commission believes that waiving the 30-day operative delay is
consistent with the protection of investors and the public interest
and, therefore, designates the proposal operative upon filing.\17\
Waiving the 30-day operative delay will enable the Exchange to
implement the proposed rule change on the same day that FINRA
implements the changes to its rules on which the proposed rule change
is based, thereby eliminating the potential for different regulatory
requirements for members of both FINRA and the Exchange.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \15\ 17 CFR 240.19b-4(f)(6).
    \16\ FINRA has announced that it will implement the changes on
April 16, 2012. See supra note 10.
    \17\ For purposes only of waiving the 30-day operative delay,
the Commission has considered the proposed rule's impact on
efficiency, competition, and capital formation. See 15 U.S.C.
78c(f).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    At any time within 60 days of the filing of the proposed rule
change, the Commission summarily may temporarily suspend such rule
change if it appears to the Commission that such action is necessary or
appropriate in the public interest, for the protection of investors, or
otherwise in furtherance of the purposes of the Act.

IV. Solicitation of Comments

    Interested persons are invited to submit written data, views, and
arguments concerning the foregoing, including whether the proposed rule
change is consistent with the Act. Comments may be submitted by any of
the following methods:

Electronic Comments

     Use the Commission's Internet comment form (http://www.sec.gov/rules/sro.shtml); or
     Send an email to<EMAIL_ADDRESS>Please include
File Number SR-NYSEAmex-2012-21 on the subject line.

Paper Comments

     Send paper comments in triplicate to Elizabeth M. Murphy,
Secretary, Securities and Exchange Commission, 100 F Street NE.,
Washington, DC 20549-1090.

All submissions should refer to File Number SR- NYSEAmex-2012-21. This
file number should be included on the subject line if email is used. To
help the Commission process and review your comments more efficiently,
please use only one method. The Commission will post all comments on
the Commission's Internet Web site (http://www.sec.gov/rules/sro.shtml). Copies of the submission, all subsequent amendments, all
written statements with respect to the proposed rule change that are
filed with the Commission, and all written communications relating to
the proposed rule change between the Commission and any person, other
than those that may be withheld from the public in accordance with the
provisions of 5 U.S.C. 552, will be available for Web site viewing and
printing in the Commission's Public Reference Room on official business
days between the hours of 10 a.m. and 3 p.m. Copies of such filing also
will be available for inspection and copying at the New York Stock
Exchange LLC's principal office and on its Internet Web site at
www.nyse.com. All comments received will be posted without change; the
Commission does not edit personal identifying information from
submissions. You should submit only information that you wish to make
available publicly. All submissions should refer to File Number SR-
NYSEAmex-2012-21, and should be submitted on or before May 9, 2012.

    For the Commission, by the Division of Trading and Markets,
pursuant to delegated authority.\18\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \18\ 17 CFR 200.30-3(a)(12).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

Kevin M. O'Neill,
Deputy Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2012-9287 Filed 4-17-12; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 8011-01-P


[Federal Register Volume 87, Number 58 (Friday, March 25, 2022)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Pages 17008-17011]
[FR Doc No: 2022-06292]

=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY

40 CFR Part 52

[EPA-R09-OAR-2022-0221; FRL-9598-02-R9]

Approval and Promulgation of Implementation Plans; California;
Correcting Amendments

AGENCY: Environmental Protection Agency (EPA).

ACTION: Direct final rule.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: On August 28, 2009, the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA)
issued a final rule titled ``Revisions to the California State
Implementation Plan, Antelope Valley Air Quality Management District.''
That publication inadvertently omitted regulatory text rescinding four
previously approved rules for the Antelope Valley Air Quality
Management District portion of the California State Implementation Plan
(SIP). On September 20, 2016, the EPA issued a final rule titled
``Approval of California Air Plan Revisions, Department of Pesticide
Regulations.'' That publication listed the wrong EPA approval dates and
Federal Register citations for certain rules. The EPA is taking direct
final action to correct these errors.

DATES: This rule is effective on May 24, 2022 without further notice
unless the EPA receives adverse comments by April 25, 2022. If we
receive such comments, we will publish a timely withdrawal in the
Federal Register to notify the public that this direct final rule will
not take effect.

ADDRESSES: Submit your comments, identified by Docket ID No. EPA-R09-
OAR-2022-0221 at https://www.regulations.gov. For comments submitted at
Regulations.gov, follow the online instructions for submitting
comments. Once submitted, comments cannot be edited or removed from
Regulations.gov. The EPA may publish any comment received to its public
docket. Do not submit electronically any information you consider to be
Confidential Business Information (CBI) or other information whose
disclosure is restricted by statute. Multimedia submissions (audio,
video, etc.) must be accompanied by a written comment. The written
comment is considered the official comment and should include
discussion of all points you wish to make. The EPA will generally not
consider comments or comment contents located outside of the primary
submission (i.e., on the web, cloud, or other file sharing system). For
additional submission methods, please contact the person identified in
the FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT section. For the full EPA public
comment policy, information about CBI or multimedia submissions, and
general guidance on making effective comments, please visit https://www.epa.gov/dockets/commenting-epa-dockets. If you need assistance in a
language other than English or if you are a person with disabilities
who needs a reasonable accommodation at no cost to you, please contact
the person identified in the FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT section.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Kevin Gong, EPA Region IX, 75
Hawthorne St., San Francisco, CA 94105. By phone:<PHONE_NUMBER> or by
email at [email protected].

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Throughout this document, wherever ``we'',
``us'' or ``our'' are used, we mean the EPA. Information is organized
as follows:

Table of Contents

I. Background
II. What the EPA Is Doing in This Action
III. Incorporation by Reference
IV. Statutory and Executive Order Reviews

I. Background

    Each State has a SIP containing the control measures and strategies
used to attain and maintain the national ambient air quality standards
(NAAQS). The SIP is extensive, containing such elements as air
pollution control regulations, emission inventories, monitoring
networks, attainment demonstrations, and enforcement mechanisms.
    Under the Clean Air Act (CAA or ``Act''), the states are
responsible for adopting and submitted SIPs and SIP revisions to
implement, maintain and enforce the NAAQS and to meet other related
requirements under the CAA and the EPA's implementing regulations. The
EPA is responsible for taking action to approve, disapprove or
conditionally approve, in whole or in part, SIPs and SIP revisions that
have been adopted by the states and submitted to the EPA. The EPA
reviews such SIPs and SIP revisions for compliance with all applicable
requirements of the CAA and the EPA's implementing regulations.

A. Addition of Regulatory Text Rescinding Certain Rules Applicable
Within the Antelope Valley Portion of California SIP

    Formed in 1997, the Antelope Valley Air Quality Management District
(AQMD) administers air quality management programs in the Mojave Desert
portion of Los Angeles County that is referred to as ``Antelope
Valley.'' The Antelope Valley AQMD portion of the California SIP
includes rules adopted by various air pollution control agencies that
had jurisdiction over stationary sources in Antelope Valley since 1972,
including the Los Angeles County Air Pollution Control District (APCD),
the Southern California APCD, the South Coast Air Quality Management
District (AQMD), and the Antelope Valley AQMD.
    On August 28, 2009 (74 FR 44294), the EPA took direct final action
to approve Antelope Valley AQMD Rule 1173 (``Fugitive Emissions of
Volatile Organic Compounds'') and to approve the rescission of four
rules originally adopted by the South Coast AQMD and carried forward as
part of the SIP for Antelope Valley when the Antelope Valley AQMD was
established: Rule 465 (``Vacuum Producing Devices or Systems''), Rule
466 (``Pumps and Compressors''), Rule 466.1 (``Valves and Flanges'')
and Rule 467 (``Pressure Relief Devices'').\1\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \1\ The EPA approved South Coast AQMD Rule 465, adopted on
December 7, 1990, at 57 FR 35758 (August 11, 1992). The EPA approved
South Coast AQMD Rule 466, adopted on October 7, 1983, at 52 FR 1627
(January 15, 1987). The EPA approved South Coast AQMD Rule 466.1,
adopted on May 2, 1980, at 47 FR 29668 (July 8, 1982). The EPA
approved South Coast AQMD Rule 467, adopted on March 5, 1982, at 48
FR 52054 (November 16, 1983).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    In our 2009 direct final rule, we added regulatory text for the
approval of Antelope Valley AQMD Rule 1173 but inadvertently failed to
include regulatory text to remove South Coast AQMD Rules 465, 466,
466.1 and 467 from the applicable SIP for Antelope Valley. Through this
direct final rule, we are correcting the error by adding regulatory
text to codify the rescission of South Coast AQMD Rules 465, 466, 466.1
and 467 as applicable to the Antelope Valley AQMD.

B. Correction of EPA Approval Dates and Federal Register Citations for
Certain Rules Adopted by the California Department of Pesticide
Regulation

    On September 20, 2016 (81 FR 64350), the EPA took final action to
approve certain rules adopted by the California Department of Pesticide
Regulation (DPR) for the California SIP. In our final rule, we
inadvertently cited the corresponding proposed rule (81 FR 6481,
February 8, 2016) as the citation and date for approval for some of the
rules, namely, California Code of Regulations (CCR), title 3, sections
6452, 6452.2, 6558, 6577 and 6864. Through this direct final rule, we
are correcting the EPA approval dates and Federal Register citations
for these DPR rules in the table of 40 CFR 52.220a(c) that lists EPA-
approved state statutes and regulations.

II. What the EPA Is Doing in This Action

    Section 110(k)(6) of the Clean Air Act (CAA or ``Act''), as amended
in 1990, provides that, whenever the EPA determines that the EPA's
action approving, disapproving, or promulgating any plan or plan
revision (or part thereof), area designation, redesignation,
classification or reclassification was in error, the EPA may in the
same manner as the approval, disapproval, or promulgation revise such
action as appropriate without requiring any further submission from the
state. Such determination and the basis thereof must be provided to the
state and the public. We interpret this provision to authorize the EPA
to make corrections to a promulgated regulation when it is shown to our
satisfaction (or we discover) that (1) we clearly erred by failing to
consider or by inappropriately considering information made available
to the EPA at the time of the promulgation, or the information made
available at the time of promulgation is subsequently demonstrated to
have been clearly inadequate, and (2) other information persuasively
supports a change in the regulation. See 57 FR 56762, at 56763
(November 30, 1992) (correcting designations, boundaries, and
classifications of ozone, carbon monoxide, particulate matter and lead
areas).
    In this action, pursuant to CAA section 110(k)(6), we are
correcting the August 28, 2009 direct final rule by adding regulatory
text that was inadvertently omitted and that removes rules for which we
approved rescissions from the Antelope Valley AQMD portion of the
California SIP. We are also correcting incorrect EPA approval dates and
Federal Register citations for certain DPR rules that we approved in a
September 20, 2016 final rule.
    We do not think anyone will object to this approval, so we are
finalizing it without proposing it in advance. However, in the Proposed
Rules section of this Federal Register, we are simultaneously proposing
the same error corrections. If we receive adverse comments by April 25,
2022, we will publish a timely withdrawal in the Federal Register to
notify the public that the direct final error correction will not take
effect and we will address the comments in a subsequent final action
based on the proposal. If we do not receive timely adverse comments,
the direct final error correction will be effective without further
notice on May 24, 2022. This will incorporate these rules into the
federally enforceable SIP.
    Please note that if the EPA receives adverse comment on an
amendment, paragraph, or section of this rule and if that provision may
be severed from the remainder of the rule, the EPA may adopt as final
those provisions of the rule that are not the subject of an adverse
comment.

III. Incorporation by Reference

    In this action, the EPA is finalizing the deletion of certain rules
that were previously incorporated by reference in the applicable
California SIP. In accordance with requirements of 1 CFR 51.5, the EPA
is deleting certain South Coast AQMD rules that were applicable in the
Antelope Valley AQMD, as described in the amendments to 40 CFR 52.220
as set out below. The EPA has made, and will continue to make,
incorporation by reference documents generally available electronically
through www.regulations.gov and/or in hard copy at the appropriate EPA
office (see the ADDRESSES section of this preamble for more
information).

IV. Statutory and Executive Order Reviews

A. General Requirements

    Under the Clean Air Act, the Administrator is required to approve a
SIP submission that complies with the provisions of the Act and
applicable federal regulations. 42 U.S.C. 7410(k); 40 CFR 52.02(a).
Thus, in reviewing SIP submissions, the EPA's role is to approve state
choices, provided that they meet the criteria of the Clean Air Act.
Accordingly, this action merely corrects errors in previous rulemakings
and does not impose additional requirements beyond those imposed by
state law. For that reason, this action:
     Is not a ``significant regulatory action'' subject to
review by the Office of Management and Budget under Executive Orders
12866 (58 FR 51735, October 4, 1993) and 13563 (76 FR 3821, January 21,
2011);
     Does not impose an information collection burden under the
provisions of the Paperwork Reduction Act (44 U.S.C. 3501 et seq.);
     Is certified as not having a significant economic impact
on a substantial number of small entities under the Regulatory
Flexibility Act (5 U.S.C. 601 et seq.);
     Does not contain any unfunded mandate or significantly or
uniquely affect small governments, as described in the Unfunded
Mandates Reform Act of 1995 (Pub. L. 104-4);
     Does not have Federalism implications as specified in
Executive Order 13132 (64 FR 43255, August 10, 1999);
     Is not an economically significant regulatory action based
on health or safety risks subject to Executive Order 13045 (62 FR
19885, April 23, 1997);
     Is not a significant regulatory action subject to
Executive Order 13211 (66 FR 28355, May 22, 2001);
     Is not subject to requirements of Section 12(d) of the
National Technology Transfer and Advancement Act of 1995 (15 U.S.C. 272
note) because application of those requirements would be inconsistent
with the Clean Air Act; and
     Does not provide the EPA with the discretionary authority
to address disproportionate human health or environmental effects with
practical, appropriate, and legally permissible methods under Executive
Order 12898 (59 FR 7629, February 16, 1994).
    In addition, the SIP is not approved to apply on any Indian
reservation land or in any other area where the EPA or an Indian tribe
has demonstrated that a tribe has jurisdiction. In those areas of
Indian country, this rule does not have tribal implications and will
not impose substantial direct costs on tribal governments or preempt
tribal law as specified by Executive Order 13175 (65 FR 67249, November
9, 2000).

B. Submission to Congress and the Comptroller General

    The Congressional Review Act, 5 U.S.C. 801 et seq., as added by the
Small Business Regulatory Enforcement Fairness Act of 1996, generally
provides that before a rule may take effect, the agency promulgating
the rule must submit a rule report, which includes a copy of the rule,
to each House of the Congress and to the Comptroller General of the
United States. The EPA will submit a report containing this action and
other required information to the U.S. Senate, the U.S. House of
Representatives, and the Comptroller General of the United States prior
to publication of the rule in the Federal Register. A major rule cannot
take effect until 60 days after it is published in the Federal
Register. This action is not a ``major rule'' as defined by 5 U.S.C.
804(2).

C. Petitions for Judicial Review

    Under section 307(b)(1) of the Clean Air Act, petitions for
judicial review of this action must be filed in the United States Court
of Appeals for the appropriate circuit by February 8, 2016. Filing a
petition for reconsideration by the Administrator of this final rule
does not affect the finality of this action for the purposes of
judicial review nor does it extend the time within which a petition for
judicial review may be filed and shall not postpone the effectiveness
of such rule or action. Parties with objections to this direct final
rule are encouraged to file a comment in response to the parallel
notice of proposed rulemaking for this action published in the Proposed
Rules section of this Federal Register, rather than file an immediate
petition for judicial review of this direct final rule, so that the EPA
can withdraw this direct final rule and address the comment in the
proposed rulemaking. This action may not be challenged later in
proceedings to enforce its requirements (see section 307(b)(2)).

List of Subjects in 40 CFR Part 52

    Environmental protection, Air pollution control, Carbon monoxide,
Incorporation by reference, Intergovernmental relations, Nitrogen
dioxide, Ozone, Particulate matter, Reporting and recordkeeping
requirements, Sulfur dioxide, Volatile organic compounds.

    Dated: March 20, 2022.
Martha Guzman Aceves,
Regional Administrator, Region IX.

    Chapter I, title 40 of the Code of Federal Regulations is amended
as follows:

PART 52--APPROVAL AND PROMULGATION OF IMPLEMENTATION PLANS

0
1. The authority citation for Part 52 continues to read as follows:

    Authority:  42 U.S.C. 7401 et seq.

Subpart F--California

0
2. Section 52.220 is amended by adding paragraphs (c)(79)(iv)(C),
(c)(125)(ii)(E), (c)(166)(i)(A)(2), (c)(166)(i)(B), (c)(166)(ii),
(c)(184)(i)(B)(13), and (c)(184)(ii) to read as follows:

Sec.  52.220  Identification of plan--in part.

* * * * *
    (c) * * *
* * * * *
    (79) * * *
    (iv) * * *
    (C) Previously approved on July 8, 1982 in paragraph (c)(79)(iv)(B)
and now deleted without replacement for implementation in the Antelope
Valley Air Quality Management District, Rule 466.1.
* * * * *
    (125) * * *
    (ii) * * *
    (E) Previously approved on November 16, 1983 in paragraph
(c)(125)(ii)(D) and now deleted without replacement for implementation
in the Antelope Valley Air Quality Management District, Rule 467.
* * * * *
    (166) * * *
    (i) * * *
    (A) * * *

    (2) Previously approved on January 15, 1987 in paragraph
(c)(166)(i)(A)(1) and now deleted without replacement for
implementation in the Antelope Valley Air Quality Management District,
Rule 466.
    (B) [Reserved]
    (ii) [Reserved]
* * * * *
    (184) * * *
    (i) * * *
    (B) * * *
    (13) Previously approved on August 11, 1992 in paragraph
(c)(184)(i)(B)(2) and now deleted without replacement for
implementation in the Antelope Valley Air Quality Management District,
Rule 465.
* * * * *
    (ii) [Reserved]
* * * * *

0
3. Section 52.220a in paragraph (c), table 1 is amended by revising the
entries for ``6452'', ``6452.2'', ``6558'', ``6577'' and ``6864'' to
read as follows:

Sec.  52.220a  Identification of plan--in part.

* * * * *
    (c) * * *

                            Table 1--EPA-Approved Statutes and State Regulations \1\
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
                                                         State                                   Additional
       State citation            Title/subject      effective date    EPA approval date         explanation
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

                                                  * * * * * * *
6452.......................  Reduced Volatile            11/1/2013  81 FR 64350, 9/20/     Amends previous
                              Organic Compound                       2016.                  version of rule
                              Emissions Field                                               approved at 77 FR
                              Fumigation Methods.                                           65294 (October 26,
                                                                                2012). Amended rule
                                                                                adopted by the
                                                                                California
                                                                                Department of
                                                                                Pesticide Regulation
                                                                                on May 23, 2013.
                                                                                Submitted on
                                                                                February 4, 2015.

                                                  * * * * * * *
6452.2.....................  Volatile Organic            11/1/2013  81 FR 64350, 9/20/     Amends previous
                              Compound Emission                      2016.                  version of rule
                              Limits.                                                       approved at 77 FR
                                                                                65294 (October 26,
                                                                                2012). Amended rule
                                                                                adopted by the
                                                                                California
                                                                                Department of
                                                                                Pesticide Regulation
                                                                                on May 23, 2013.
                                                                                Submitted on
                                                                                February 4, 2015.

                                                  * * * * * * *
6558.......................  Recommendations for         11/1/2013  81 FR 64350, 9/20/     Adopted by the
                              Use of Nonfumigants                    2016.                  California
                              in the San Joaquin                                            Department of
                              Valley Ozone                                                  Pesticide Regulation
                              Nonattainment Area.                                           on May 23, 2013.
                                                                                Submitted on
                                                                                February 4, 2015.

                                                  * * * * * * *
6577.......................  Sales of Nonfumigants       11/1/2013  81 FR 64350, 9/20/     Adopted by the
                              for Use in the San                     2016.                  California
                              Joaquin Valley Ozone                                          Department of
                              Nonattainment Area.                                           Pesticide Regulation
                                                                                on May 23, 2013.
                                                                                Submitted on
                                                                                February 4, 2015.

                                                  * * * * * * *
6864.......................  Criteria for                11/1/2013  81 FR 64350, 9/20/     Adopted by the
                              Identifying                            2016.                  California
                              Pesticides as Toxic                                           Department of
                              Air Contaminants.                                             Pesticide Regulation
                                                                                on May 23, 2013.
                                                                                Submitted on
                                                                                February 4, 2015.

                                                  * * * * * * *
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
\1\ Table 1 lists EPA-approved California statutes and regulations incorporated by reference in the applicable
  SIP. Table 2 of paragraph (c) lists approved California test procedures, test methods and specifications that
  are cited in certain regulations listed in table 1. Approved California statutes that are nonregulatory or
  quasi-regulatory are listed in paragraph (e).

* * * * *
[FR Doc. 2022-06292 Filed 3-24-22; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6560-50-P


[Federal Register Volume 84, Number 97 (Monday, May 20, 2019)]
[Proposed Rules]
[Pages 22786-22787]
[FR Doc No: 2019-10346]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY

40 CFR Part 52

[EPA-R04-OAR-2018-0838; FRL-9993-74-Region 4]

Air Plan Approval; TN; Volatile Organic Compounds Definition Rule
Revision for Chattanooga

AGENCY: Environmental Protection Agency (EPA).

ACTION: Proposed rule.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) is proposing to
approve a revision to the Chattanooga portion of the Tennessee State
Implementation Plan (SIP), provided by the Tennessee Department of
Environment and Conservation on behalf of the Chattanooga-Hamilton
County Air Pollution Control Bureau through a letter dated September
12, 2018. The revision makes changes to the definition of volatile
organic compounds (VOC) that are consistent with changes to state and
federal regulations. EPA is proposing to approve the changes because
they are consistent with the Clean Air Act (CAA or Act).

DATES: Comments must be received on or before June 19, 2019.

ADDRESSES: Submit your comments, identified by Docket ID No. EPA-R04-
OAR-2018-0838 at http://www.regulations.gov. Follow the online
instructions for submitting comments. Once submitted, comments cannot
be edited or removed from Regulations.gov. EPA may publish any comment
received to its public docket. Do not submit electronically any
information you consider to be Confidential Business Information (CBI)
or other information whose disclosure is restricted by statute.
Multimedia submissions (audio, video, etc.) must be accompanied by a
written comment. The written comment is considered the official comment
and should include discussion of all points you wish to make. EPA will
generally not consider comments or comment contents located outside of
the primary submission (i.e., on the web, cloud, or other file sharing
system). For additional submission methods, the full EPA public comment
policy, information about CBI or multimedia submissions, and general
guidance on making effective comments, please visit http://www2.epa.gov/dockets/commenting-epa-dockets.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Evan Adams of the Air Regulatory
Management Section, Air Planning and Implementation Branch, Air and
Radiation Division, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Region 4, 61
Forsyth Street SW, Atlanta, Georgia 30303-8960. The telephone number is
(404) 562-9009. Mr. Adams can also be reached via electronic mail at
<EMAIL_ADDRESS>
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

I. Background

    Tropospheric ozone, commonly known as smog, occurs when VOC and
nitrogen oxides (NOX) react in the atmosphere in the
presence of sunlight. Because of the harmful health effects of ozone,
EPA and state governments limit the amount of VOC and NOX
that can be released into the atmosphere. VOC are those compounds of
carbon (excluding carbon monoxide, carbon dioxide, carbonic acid,
metallic carbides or carbonates, and ammonium carbonate) that form
ozone through atmospheric photochemical reactions. Compounds of carbon
(or organic compounds) have different levels of reactivity; they do not
react at the same speed or do not form ozone to the same extent.
    Section 302(s) of the CAA specifies that EPA has the authority to
define the meaning of ``VOC,'' and hence what compounds shall be
treated as VOC for regulatory purposes. It has been EPA's policy that
compounds of carbon with negligible reactivity need not be regulated to
reduce ozone and should be excluded from the regulatory definition of
VOC. See 42 FR 35314 (July 8, 1977), 70 FR 54046 (September 13, 2005).
EPA determines whether a given carbon compound has ``negligible''
reactivity by comparing the compound's reactivity to the reactivity of
ethane. EPA lists these compounds in its regulations at 40 CFR
51.100(s) and excludes them from the definition of VOC. The chemicals
on this list are often called ``negligibly reactive.'' EPA may
periodically revise the list of negligibly reactive compounds to add or
delete compounds.
    In this rulemaking, EPA is proposing action to approve
Chattanooga's SIP revision which amends the definition of ``Volatile
Organic Compounds'' in the Chattanooga City Code, Part II, Chapter 4,
Section 4-2, Definitions. This SIP revision amends paragraphs 1 and 2
to make the Chattanooga portion consistent with changes to Federal and
other similar SIP-approved regulations.1 2
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \1\ EPA approved similar revisions to the Tennessee SIP on April
13, 2006, and September 26, 2018. See 71 FR 19124 and 83 FR 48547,
respectively.
    \2\ With respect to all of the compounds added to those excluded
from the Chattanooga SIP's definition of VOC, EPA has issued final
rules revising the Federal definition of VOC to exclude the
compounds as negligibly reactive compounds: EPA added
1,1,1,2,2,3,4,5,5,5-decafluoro-3-methoxy-4-trifluoromethyl-pentane
(HFE-7300) on January 18, 2007. See 72 FR 2193. EPA added propylene
carbonate and dimethyl carbonate on January 21, 2009. See 74 FR
3437. EPA added trans-1,3,3,3-tetrafluoropropene on June 22, 2012.
See 77 FR 37610. EPA added HCF2OCF2H (also
known as HFE-134), HCF2OCF2OCF2H
(also known as HFE-236cal2),
HCF2OCF2CF2OCF2H (also
known as HFE-338pcc13), and
HCF2OCF2OCF2CF2OCF2
 H (also known as H-Galden 1040X or H-Galden ZT 130 (or 150 or 180))
on February 12, 2013. See 78 FR 923. EPA added trans-1-chloro-3,3,3-
trifluoroprop-1-ene on August 28, 2013. See 78 FR 53029. EPA added
2,3,3,3-tetrafluoropropene on October 22, 2013. See 78 FR 62451. EPA
added 2-amino-2-methyl-1-propanol on March 27, 2014. See 79 FR
17037.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

II. Analysis of State's Submittal

    On September 12, 2018, Tennessee submitted a SIP revision to EPA
for review and approval amending the definition of VOC found in Part
II, Chapter 4, Section 4-2, of the Chattanooga Code.\3\ Specifically,
the revision adds the following compounds to the list of negligibly
reactive compounds to be consistent with additions to federal and other
similar

SIP-approved regulations: 1,1,1,2,2,3,4,5,5,5-decafluoro-3-methoxy-4-
(trifluoromethyl)pentane (HFE-7300); propylene carbonate; dimethyl
carbonate; trans-1,3,3,3-tetrafluoropropene;
HCF2OCF2H (HFE-134);
HCF2OCF2OCF2H (HFE-236cal2);
HCF2OCF2CF2OCF2H (HFE-
338pcc13);
HCF2OCF2OCF2CF2OCF2
H (H-Galden 1040x or H-Galden ZT 130 (or 150 or 180)); trans-1-chloro-
3,3,3-trifluoroprop-1-ene; 2,3,3,3-tetrafluoropropene; and 2-amino-2-
methyl-1-propanol. These compounds are excluded from the VOC definition
on the basis that each of these compounds makes a negligible
contribution to tropospheric ozone formation. EPA is proposing to
approve this revision because it is consistent with revisions to the
Federal definition of VOC at 40 CFR 51.100(s). EPA is also proposing to
approve this revision because, as noted in Section I, above, it is
consistent with other similar SIP-approved regulations. The revision
also includes the following minor, administrative changes: Spelling
corrections to certain compounds already listed in paragraph 1 and a
spelling correction that changes ``negligibility'' to ``negligibly'' in
paragraph 2 of Part II, Chapter 4, Section 4-2, of the Chattanooga
Code.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \3\ EPA notes that the Agency received the SIP revision on
September 18, 2018, along with other SIP revisions from Tennessee.
EPA will consider the other SIP revisions in a separate rulemaking.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    Pursuant to CAA section 110(l), the Administrator shall not approve
a revision of a plan if the revision would interfere with any
applicable requirement concerning attainment and reasonable further
progress (as defined in CAA section 171), or any other applicable
requirement of the Act. The County's addition of exemptions from the
definition of VOC in paragraph 1 in the Chattanooga City Code, Part II,
Chapter 4, Section 4-2, Definitions, of the are approvable under
section 110(l) because they reflect changes to federal regulations
based on findings that the aforementioned compounds are negligibly
reactive and make a negligible contribution to tropospheric ozone
formation.

III. Incorporation by Reference

    In this document, EPA is proposing to include in a final EPA rule
regulatory text that includes incorporation by reference. In accordance
with requirements of 1 CFR 51.5, EPA is proposing to incorporate by
reference Part II, Chapter 4, Section 4-2, of the Chattanooga City
Code, state effective January 23, 2017, which revised the definition of
VOC so that it better aligns with the federal regulations. EPA has
made, and will continue to make, these materials generally available
through www.regulations.gov and at the EPA Region 4 office (please
contact the person identified in the FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT
section of this preamble for more information).

IV. Proposed Action

    EPA is proposing to approve the aforementioned changes to the
Chattanooga portion of the Tennessee SIP because the changes are
consistent with section 110 of the CAA and meet the regulatory
requirements of the Act. EPA views these changes as being consistent
with the CAA and does not believe that these changes will result in a
change in emissions.

V. Statutory and Executive Order Reviews

    Under the CAA, the Administrator is required to approve a SIP
submission that complies with the provisions of the Act and applicable
Federal regulations. See 42 U.S.C. 7410(k); 40 CFR 52.02(a). Thus, in
reviewing SIP submissions, EPA's role is to approve state choices,
provided that they meet the criteria of the CAA. This action merely
proposes to approve state law as meeting Federal requirements and does
not impose additional requirements beyond those imposed by state law.
For that reason, this proposed action:
     Is not a significant regulatory action subject to review
by the Office of Management and Budget under Executive Orders 12866 (58
FR 51735, October 4, 1993) and 13563 (76 FR 3821, January 21, 2011);
     Is not an Executive Order 13771 (82 FR 9339, February 2,
2017) regulatory action because SIP approvals are exempted under
Executive Order 12866;
     Does not impose an information collection burden under the
provisions of the Paperwork Reduction Act (44 U.S.C. 3501 et seq.);
     Is certified as not having a significant economic impact
on a substantial number of small entities under the Regulatory
Flexibility Act (5 U.S.C. 601 et seq.);
     Does not contain any unfunded mandate or significantly or
uniquely affect small governments, as described in the Unfunded
Mandates Reform Act of 1995 (Pub. L. 104-4);
     Does not have Federalism implications as specified in
Executive Order 13132 (64 FR 43255, August 10, 1999);
     Is not an economically significant regulatory action based
on health or safety risks subject to Executive Order 13045 (62 FR
19885, April 23, 1997);
     Is not a significant regulatory action subject to
Executive Order 13211 (66 FR 28355, May 22, 2001);
     Is not subject to requirements of section 12(d) of the
National Technology Transfer and Advancement Act of 1995 (15 U.S.C. 272
note) because application of those requirements would be inconsistent
with the CAA; and
     Does not provide EPA with the discretionary authority to
address, as appropriate, disproportionate human health or environmental
effects, using practicable and legally permissible methods, under
Executive Order 12898 (59 FR 7629, February 16, 1994).
    The SIP is not approved to apply on any Indian reservation land or
in any other area where EPA or an Indian tribe has demonstrated that a
tribe has jurisdiction. In those areas of Indian country, the rule does
not have tribal implications as specified by Executive Order 13175 (65
FR 67249, November 9, 2000), nor will it impose substantial direct
costs on tribal governments or preempt tribal law.

List of Subjects in 40 CFR Part 52

    Environmental protection, Air pollution control, Incorporation by
reference, Ozone, Volatile organic compounds.

    Authority:  42 U.S.C. 7401 et seq.

    Dated: May 6, 2019.
Mary S. Walker,
Acting Regional Administrator, Region 4.
[FR Doc. 2019-10346 Filed 5-17-19; 8:45 am]
 BILLING CODE 6560-50-P


Comment Info: =================

General Comment:Re: Request for an Extension of Time regarding the Comment Period   We respectfully request that you extend the comment period for an additional 180 days in order to allow adequate time to analyze the proposed regulation, and, in particular, to comment on the number of requests for comments contained in the regulation.  As a small tobacco manufacturer, as defined in the Tobacco Act (21 USC 387 (16)) , we do not have sufficient staff to address the number of issues raised within the proposed regulations in the time frame allotted.


[Federal Register Volume 83, Number 245 (Friday, December 21, 2018)]
[Notices]
[Page 65658]
[FR Doc No: 2018-27582]

=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY

[EPA-HQ-OECA-2014-0087; FRL-9987-22-OEI]

Information Collection Request Submitted to OMB for Review and
Approval; Comment Request; NESHAP for Leather Finishing Operations
(Renewal)

AGENCY: Environmental Protection Agency (EPA).

ACTION: Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Environmental Protection Agency has submitted an
information collection request (ICR), NESHAP for Leather Finishing
Operations (EPA ICR No. 1985.08, OMB Control No. 2060-0478), to the
Office of Management and Budget (OMB) for review and approval in
accordance with the Paperwork Reduction Act. This is a proposed
extension of the ICR, which is currently approved through December 31,
2018. Public comments were previously requested, via the Federal
Register, on June 29, 2017 during a 60-day comment period. This notice
allows for an additional 30 days for public comments. A fuller
description of the ICR is given below, including its estimated burden
and cost to the public. An agency may neither conduct nor sponsor, and
a person is not required to respond to, a collection of information
unless it displays a currently valid OMB control number.

DATES: Additional comments may be submitted on or before January 22,
2019.

ADDRESSES: Submit your comments, referencing Docket ID Number EPA-HQ-
OECA-2014-0083, to: (1) EPA online using www.regulations.gov (our
preferred method), or by email to<EMAIL_ADDRESS>or by mail to:
EPA Docket Center, Environmental Protection Agency, Mail Code 28221T,
1200 Pennsylvania Ave. NW, Washington, DC 20460; and (2) OMB via email
to<EMAIL_ADDRESS>Address comments to OMB Desk Officer
for EPA.
    The EPA's policy is that all comments received will be included in
the public docket without change including any personal information
provided, unless the comment includes profanity, threats, information
claimed to be Confidential Business Information (CBI), or other
information whose disclosure is restricted by statute.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Patrick Yellin, Monitoring,
Assistance, and Media Programs Division, Office of Compliance, Mail
Code 2227A, Environmental Protection Agency, 1200 Pennsylvania Ave. NW,
Washington, DC 20460; telephone number:<PHONE_NUMBER>; fax number:
(202) 564-0050; email address<EMAIL_ADDRESS>
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Supporting documents, which explain in
detail the information that the EPA will be collecting, are available
in the public docket for this ICR. The docket can be viewed online at
www.regulations.gov or in person at the EPA Docket Center, WJC West,
Room 3334, 1301 Constitution Ave. NW, Washington, DC. The telephone
number for the Docket Center is<PHONE_NUMBER>. For additional
information about EPA's public docket, visit: http://www.epa.gov/dockets.
    Abstract: The potential respondents for this collection of
information are owners or operators of any affected source with leather
finishing operations subject to 40 CFR part 63, subpart TTTT. Owners
and operators of affected facilities are required to comply with
reporting and recordkeeping requirements for the General Provisions of
the NESHAP (40 CFR part 63, subpart A), as well as for the requirements
in 40 CFR part 63, subpart TTTT. This includes submitting initial
notifications, performance tests and periodic reports and results, and
maintaining records of the occurrence and duration of any startup,
shutdown, or malfunction in the operation of an affected facility, or
any period during which the monitoring system is inoperative. These
reports are used by the EPA to determine compliance with these
standards.
    Form numbers: None.
    Respondents/affected entities: Leather finishing operations.
    Respondent's obligation to respond: Mandatory (40 CFR part 63,
subpart TTTT).
    Estimated number of respondents: 4 (total).
    Frequency of response: Initially, occasionally and annually.
    Total estimated burden: 138 hours (per year). Burden is defined at
5 CFR 1320.3(b).
    Total estimated cost: $12,500 (per year), which includes $0 for
capital/startup and/or operation & maintenance (O&M) costs.
    Changes in the estimates: There is an adjustment decrease in the
total estimated burden as currently identified in the OMB Inventory of
Approved Burdens. This decrease is not due to any program changes. The
change in the burden and cost estimates is due to more accurate
estimates of existing sources based on the EPA's recent reevaluation of
the source category inventory as part of a recently proposed risk and
technology review (83 FR 11314, March 14, 2018), which indicated that
several facilities have shut down since the last ICR renewal period.
These changes result in an overall decrease in the labor hours, number
of responses, and O&M costs.

Courtney Kerwin,
Director, Regulatory Support Division.
[FR Doc. 2018-27582 Filed 12-20-18; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6560-50-P


[Federal Register: October 26, 2010 (Volume 75, Number 206)]
[Notices]
[Page 65620-65621]
[DOCID:fr26oc10-44]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission

[Project No. P-12783-003]

Inglis Hydropower, LLC; Notice of Application Ready for
Environmental Analysis and Soliciting Comments, Recommendations, Terms
and Conditions, and Prescriptions

October 19, 2010.
    Take notice that the following hydroelectric application has been
filed with the Commission and is available for public inspection.
    a. Type of Application: Original Major License.
    b. Project No.: P-12783-003.
    c. Date filed: July 22, 2009.
    d. Applicant: Inglis Hydropower, LLC.
    e. Name of Project: Inglis Hydropower Project.
    f. Location: The project would be located at the existing Inglis
bypass channel and spillway on the Withlacoochee River, west of Lake
Rousseau and Inglis Dam, within the town of Inglis and Levy, Citrus,
and Marion counties, Florida. No federal lands would be occupied by the
proposed project.
    g. Filed Pursuant to: Federal Power Act 16 U.S.C. 791(a)--825(r).
    h. Applicant Contact: Mr. Dean Edwards, P.O. Box 1565, Dover, FL
33527; Mr. Kevin Edwards, P.O. Box 143, Mayodan, NC 27027.
    i. FERC Contact: Jennifer Adams at<PHONE_NUMBER>, or
<EMAIL_ADDRESS>    j. The deadline for filing comments, recommendations, terms and
conditions, and prescriptions is 60 days from the issuance of this
notice and reply comments are due 105 days from the issuance date of
this notice.
    All documents may be filed electronically via the Internet. See 18
CFR 385.2001(a)(1)(iii) and the instructions on the Commission's Web
site http://www.ferc.gov/docs-filing/efiling.asp. Commenters can submit
brief comments up to 6,000 characters, without prior registration,
using the eComment system at http://www.ferc.gov/docs-filing/
ecomment.asp. You must include your name and contact information at the
end of your comments. For assistance, please contact FERC Online
Support at<EMAIL_ADDRESS>or toll-free at 1-866-208-3676,
or for TTY,<PHONE_NUMBER>. Although the Commission strongly encourages
electronic filing, documents may also be paper-filed. To paper-file,
mail an original and seven copies to: Kimberly D. Bose, Secretary,
Federal Energy Regulatory Commission, 888 First Street, NE.,
Washington, DC 20426.
    The Commission's Rules of Practice require all intervenors filing
documents with the Commission to serve a copy of that document on each
person on the official service list for the project. Further, if an
intervenor files comments or documents with the Commission relating to
the merits of an issue that may affect the responsibilities of a
particular resource agency, they must also serve a copy of the document
on that resource agency.
    k. This application has been accepted and is ready for
environmental analysis at this time.
    l. The proposed 2.0-megawatt Inglis Hydropower Project would
operate using flows released by the Southwest Water Management District
from Lake Rousseau which is typically operated to maintain the water
surface elevation of Lake Rousseau at 27.5 feet mean sea level. The
proposed project would consist of: (1) A 45-foot-long, 100-foot-wide
intake conveying water from the bypass channel located downstream of
Lake Rousseau; (2) a 130-foot-long penstock consisting of two 14-foot
by 14-foot reinforced concrete conduits; (3) a 60-foot-long, 80-foot-
wide, 30-foot-high concrete powerhouse containing three vertical shaft
turbines, two 0.8 megawatt (MW) turbines and one 0.4 MW turbine for a
total installed capacity of 2.0 MW; (4) a 100-foot-long concrete
discharge channel; (5) a new substation adjacent to the powerhouse; (6)
a 120-foot-long, 24.5-kilovolt transmission line connecting the project
substation to the local utility; and (7) appurtenant facilities. The
Inglis Project would annually generate approximately 12,300 megawatt-
hours.
    m. A copy of the application is available for review at the
Commission in the Public Reference Room or may be viewed on the
Commission's Web site at http://www.ferc.gov. using the ``eLibrary

link.'' Enter the docket number, excluding the last three digits in the
docket number field, to access the document. For assistance, contact
FERC Online Support. A copy is also available for inspection and
reproduction at the address in item h above.
    All filings must: (1) Bear in all capital letters the title
``COMMENTS,'' ``REPLY COMMENTS,'' ``RECOMMENDA- TIONS,'' ``TERMS AND
CONDITIONS,'' or ``PRESCRIPTIONS;'' (2) set forth in the heading the
name of the applicant and the project number of the application to
which the filing responds; (3) furnish the name, address, and telephone
number of the person submitting the filing; and (4) otherwise comply
with the requirements of 18 CFR 385.2001 through 385.2005. All
comments, recommendations, terms and conditions, or prescriptions must
set forth their evidentiary basis, and otherwise comply with the
requirements of 18 CFR 4.34(b). Agencies may obtain copies of the
application directly from the applicant. Each filing must be
accompanied by proof of service on all persons listed on the service
list prepared by the Commission in this proceeding, in accordance with
18 CFR 4.34(b), and 385.2010.
    You may also register online at http://www.ferc.gov/docs-filing/
esubscription.asp to be notified via e-mail of new filings and
issuances related to this, or other pending projects. For assistance,
contact FERC Online Support.
    n. Public notice of the filing of the initial development
application, which has already been given, established the due date for
filing competing applications or notices of intent. Under the
Commission's regulations, any competing development application must be
filed in response to, and in compliance with, public notice of the
initial development application. No competing applications or notices
of intent may be filed in response to this notice.
    o. A license applicant must file, no later than 60 days following
the date of issuance of this notice: (1) A copy of the water quality
certification; (2) a copy of the request for certification, including
proof of the date on which the certifying agency received the request;
or (3) evidence of waiver of water quality certification.

Kimberly D. Bose,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2010-26990 Filed 10-25-10; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6717-01-P


Janet Cakir/RTP/USEPA/US

03/13/2008 03:29 PM

To

Lydia Wegman/RTP/USEPA/US@EPA

cc

Tricia Crabtree/RTP/USEPA/US@EPA, Ron Evans/RTP/USEPA/US@EPA

Subject

Final set of electronic files for the March 2008 Ozone NAAQS RIA

Email #6 of 6....

Copy of initial message....

Lydia,

    I am pleased to provide to you in this, and the following emails, a final set of electronic files for the March 2008 Ozone NAAQS Final RIA.  Within these files is the Regulatory Impact Analysis performed by the Air Benefit and Cost Group to support 2008 Ozone NAAQS Review.

Thank you,

Janet Cakir

_______________________________________

Janet F. Cakir, Ph.D.

Environmental Protection Specialist

Air Benefits Cost Group

109 TW Alexander Dr., (C439-02)

Research Triangle Park, NC 27711

Tel:<PHONE_NUMBER>

Fax:<PHONE_NUMBER>

email<EMAIL_ADDRESS>


[Federal Register Volume 87, Number 11 (Tuesday, January 18, 2022)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Pages 2525-2527]
[FR Doc No: 2022-00588]

=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION

Federal Aviation Administration

14 CFR Part 39

[Docket No. FAA-2021-0665; Project Identifier AD-2021-00270-T;
Amendment 39-21848; AD 2021-25-05]
RIN 2120-AA64

Airworthiness Directives; The Boeing Company Airplanes

AGENCY: Federal Aviation Administration (FAA), DOT.

ACTION: Final rule.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The FAA is superseding Airworthiness Directive (AD) 2017-23-
02, which applied to certain The Boeing Company Model 737-200, -200C, -
300, -400, and -500 series airplanes. AD 2017-23-02 required repetitive
inspections, replacement, and applicable on-condition actions for
certain fuselage crown skin panels. This AD was prompted by an
evaluation by the design approval holder indicating that the fuselage
crown skin panels are subject to widespread fatigue damage. This AD
retains the actions in AD 2017-23-02, revises certain airplane
configurations and inspection locations, and adds airplanes to the
applicability. The FAA is issuing this AD to address the unsafe
condition on these products.

DATES: This AD is effective February 22, 2022.
    The Director of the Federal Register approved the incorporation by
reference of a certain publication listed in this AD as of February 22,
2022.

ADDRESSES: For service information identified in this final rule,
contact Boeing Commercial Airplanes, Attention: Contractual & Data
Services (C&DS), 2600 Westminster Blvd., MC 110-SK57, Seal Beach, CA
90740-5600; telephone<PHONE_NUMBER>; internet https://www.myboeingfleet.com. You may view this service information at the
FAA, Airworthiness Products Section, Operational Safety Branch, 2200
South 216th St., Des Moines, WA. For information on the availability of
this material at the FAA, call<PHONE_NUMBER>. It is also available at
https://www.regulations.gov by searching for and locating Docket No.
FAA-2021-0665.

Examining the AD Docket

    You may examine the AD docket at https://www.regulations.gov by
searching for and locating Docket No. FAA-2021-0665; or in person at
Docket Operations between 9 a.m. and 5 p.m., Monday through Friday,
except Federal holidays. The AD docket contains this final rule, any
comments received, and other information. The address for Docket
Operations is U.S. Department of Transportation, Docket Operations, M-
30, West Building Ground Floor, Room W12-140, 1200 New Jersey Avenue
SE, Washington, DC 20590.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: James Guo, Aerospace Engineer,
Airframe Section, FAA, Los Angeles ACO Branch, 3960 Paramount
Boulevard, Lakewood, CA 90712-4137; phone:<PHONE_NUMBER>; email:
[email protected].

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

Background

    The FAA issued a notice of proposed rulemaking (NPRM) to amend 14
CFR part 39 to supersede AD 2017-23-02, Amendment 39-19096 (82 FR
52835, November 15, 2017) (AD 2017-23-02). AD 2017-23-02 applied to
certain The Boeing Company Model 737-200, -200C, -300, -400, and -500
series airplanes. The NPRM published in the Federal Register on August
24, 2021 (86 FR 47260). The NPRM was prompted by an evaluation by the
design approval holder indicating that the fuselage crown skin panels
are subject to widespread fatigue damage. In the NPRM, the FAA proposed
to retain the actions in AD 2017-23-02, revise certain airplane
configurations and inspection locations, and add airplanes to the
applicability. The FAA is issuing this AD to address cracking in the
fuselage crown skin panels. Multiple adjacent cracks in the fuselage
crown skin could link up and lead to decompression or loss of
structural integrity of the airplane.

Discussion of Final Airworthiness Directive

Comments

    The FAA received a comment from one commenter. The following
presents the comment received on the NPRM and the FAA's response.

Effect of Winglets on Accomplishment of the Proposed Actions

    Aviation Partners Boeing stated that the installation of winglets
per Supplemental Type Certificate (STC) ST01219SE does not affect the
actions specified in the proposed AD.
    The FAA concurs with the commenter. The FAA has redesignated
paragraph (c) of the proposed AD as paragraph (c)(1) of this AD and
added paragraph (c)(2) to this AD to state that installation of STC
ST01219SE does not affect the ability to accomplish the actions
required by this AD. Therefore,

for airplanes on which STC ST01219SE is installed, a ``change in
product'' alternative method of compliance (AMOC) approval request is
not necessary to comply with the requirements of 14 CFR 39.17.

Conclusion

    The FAA reviewed the relevant data, considered any comments
received, and determined that air safety requires adopting this AD as
proposed. Except for minor editorial changes, and any other changes
described previously, this AD is adopted as proposed in the NPRM. None
of the changes will increase the economic burden on any operator.

Related Service Information Under 1 CFR Part 51

    The FAA reviewed Boeing Alert Service Bulletin 737-53A1358,
Revision 1, dated February 26, 2021. This service information specifies
procedures for repetitive non-destructive inspections for cracking,
replacement of certain fuselage crown skin panels, and applicable on-
condition actions. On-condition actions include a general visual
inspection of certain repairs for any loose or missing fasteners, a low
frequency eddy current (LFEC) inspection of certain repairs for
cracking, and repair. This service information is reasonably available
because the interested parties have access to it through their normal
course of business or by the means identified in ADDRESSES.

Costs of Compliance

    The FAA estimates that this AD affects 143 airplanes of U.S.
registry. The FAA estimates the following costs to comply with this AD:

                                                 Estimated Costs
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
                                                                                Cost on U.S.
           Action                  Labor cost         Parts cost       Cost per product          operators
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Inspection.................  Up to 507 work-hours               $0  Up to $43,095 per      Up to $6,162,585 per
                              x $85 per hour = Up                    inspection cycle.      inspection cycle.
                              to $43,095 per
                              inspection cycle.
Replacement................  304 work-hours x $85           95,000  $120,840 per skin      $17,280,120 per skin
                              per hour = $25,840                     panel.                 panel.
                              per skin panel.
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

    The FAA estimates the following costs to do any necessary
inspections that would be required based on the results of the
inspection. The FAA has no way of determining the number of aircraft
that might need these inspections:

                                               On-Condition Costs
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
                                                                                Cost per
                    Action                                 Labor cost               Parts cost        product
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
LFEC inspection...............................  1 work-hours x $85 per hour =                 $0             $85
                                                 $85.
General visual inspection.....................  1 work-hour x $85 per hour = $85               0              85
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

    The FAA has received no definitive data on which to base the cost
estimates for the on-condition repairs specified in this AD.

Authority for This Rulemaking

    Title 49 of the United States Code specifies the FAA's authority to
issue rules on aviation safety. Subtitle I, section 106, describes the
authority of the FAA Administrator. Subtitle VII: Aviation Programs,
describes in more detail the scope of the Agency's authority.
    The FAA is issuing this rulemaking under the authority described in
Subtitle VII, Part A, Subpart III, Section 44701: General requirements.
Under that section, Congress charges the FAA with promoting safe flight
of civil aircraft in air commerce by prescribing regulations for
practices, methods, and procedures the Administrator finds necessary
for safety in air commerce. This regulation is within the scope of that
authority because it addresses an unsafe condition that is likely to
exist or develop on products identified in this rulemaking action.

Regulatory Findings

    This AD will not have federalism implications under Executive Order
13132. This AD will not have a substantial direct effect on the States,
on the relationship between the national government and the States, or
on the distribution of power and responsibilities among the various
levels of government.
    For the reasons discussed above, I certify that this AD:
    (1) Is not a ``significant regulatory action'' under Executive
Order 12866,
    (2) Will not affect intrastate aviation in Alaska, and
    (3) Will not have a significant economic impact, positive or
negative, on a substantial number of small entities under the criteria
of the Regulatory Flexibility Act.

List of Subjects in 14 CFR Part 39

    Air transportation, Aircraft, Aviation safety, Incorporation by
reference, Safety.

The Amendment

    Accordingly, under the authority delegated to me by the
Administrator, the FAA amends 14 CFR part 39 as follows:

PART 39--AIRWORTHINESS DIRECTIVES

0
1. The authority citation for part 39 continues to read as follows:

    Authority:  49 U.S.C. 106(g), 40113, 44701.

Sec.  39.13   [Amended]

0
2. The FAA amends Sec.  39.13 by:
0
a. Removing Airworthiness Directive (AD) 2017-23-02, Amendment 39-19096
(82 FR 52835, November 15, 2017); and
0
b. Adding the following new AD:

2021-25-05 The Boeing Company: Amendment 39-21848; Docket No. FAA-
2021-0665; Project Identifier AD-2021-00270-T.

(a) Effective Date

    This airworthiness directive (AD) is effective February 22,
2022.

(b) Affected ADs

    This AD replaces AD 2017-23-02, Amendment 39-19096 (82 FR 52835,
November 15, 2017) (AD 2017-23-02).

(c) Applicability

    (1) This AD applies to The Boeing Company Model 737-100, -200, -
200C, -300, -400, and -500 series airplanes, certificated in any
category, as identified in Boeing Alert Service Bulletin 737-
53A1358, Revision 1, dated February 26, 2021.
    (2) Installation of Supplemental Type Certificate (STC)
ST01219SE does not affect the ability to accomplish the actions
required by this AD. Therefore, for airplanes on which STC ST01219SE
is installed, a ``change in product'' alternative method of
compliance (AMOC) approval request is not necessary to comply with
the requirements of 14 CFR 39.17.

(d) Subject

    Air Transport Association (ATA) of America Code 53, Fuselage.

(e) Unsafe Condition

    This AD was prompted by an evaluation by the design approval
holder indicating that the fuselage crown skin panels are subject to
widespread fatigue damage. This AD was also prompted by a
determination that certain airplane configurations and inspection
locations need to be revised, and that additional airplanes are
subject to the unsafe condition. The FAA is issuing this AD to
address cracking in the fuselage crown skin panels. Multiple
adjacent cracks in the fuselage crown skin could link up and lead to
decompression or loss of structural integrity of the airplane.

(f) Compliance

    Comply with this AD within the compliance times specified,
unless already done.

(g) Actions for Group 43 Airplanes

    For airplanes identified as Group 43 in Boeing Alert Service
Bulletin 737-53A1358, Revision 1, dated February 26, 2021, within
120 days after the effective date of this AD, inspect the airplane
and do all applicable on-condition actions using a method approved
in accordance with the procedures specified in paragraph (j) of this
AD

(h) Required Actions for Groups 1 Through 42 Airplanes

    For airplanes identified as Groups 1 through 42 in Boeing Alert
Service Bulletin 737-53A1358, Revision 1, dated February 26, 2021,
except as specified by paragraph (i) of this AD: At the applicable
times specified in paragraph 1.E., ``Compliance,'' of Boeing Alert
Service Bulletin 737-53A1358, Revision 1, dated February 26, 2021,
do all applicable actions identified as ``RC'' (required for
compliance) in, and in accordance with, the Accomplishment
Instructions of Boeing Alert Service Bulletin 737-53A1358, Revision
1, dated February 26, 2021. Actions identified as terminating action
in Boeing Alert Service Bulletin 737-53A1358, Revision 1, dated
February 26, 2021, terminate the applicable required actions of this
AD, provided the terminating action is done in accordance with the
Accomplishment Instructions of Boeing Alert Service Bulletin 737-
53A1358, Revision 1, dated February 26, 2021.

(i) Exceptions to Service Information Specifications

    (1) Where Boeing Alert Service Bulletin 737-53A1358, Revision 1,
dated February 26, 2021, uses the phrase ``the original issue date
of this service bulletin,'' this AD requires using ``December 20,
2017'' (the effective date of AD 2017-23-02).
    (2) Where Boeing Alert Service Bulletin 737-53A1358, Revision 1,
dated February 26, 2021, specifies contacting Boeing for repair
instructions or for work instructions, this AD requires doing the
repair, or doing the work instructions and applicable on-condition
actions using a method approved in accordance with the procedures
specified in paragraph (j) of this AD.
    (3) Part 7 of Boeing Alert Service Bulletin 737-53A1358,
Revision 1, dated February 26, 2021, specifies post-modification
airworthiness limitation inspections in compliance with 14 CFR
25.571(a)(3) at the modified locations to support compliance with 14
CFR 121.1109(c)(2) or 129.109(b)(2). Although Part 7 is identified
as RC, this AD does not require accomplishment of Part 7. As
airworthiness limitations, these inspections are required by
maintenance and operational rules. It is, therefore, unnecessary to
mandate them in this AD. Deviations from these inspections require
FAA approval, but do not require an AMOC.

(j) Alternative Methods of Compliance (AMOCs)

    (1) The Manager, Los Angeles ACO Branch, FAA, has the authority
to approve AMOCs for this AD, if requested using the procedures
found in 14 CFR 39.19. In accordance with 14 CFR 39.19, send your
request to your principal inspector or responsible Flight Standards
Office, as appropriate. If sending information directly to the
manager of the certification office, send it to the attention of the
person identified in Related Information. Information may be emailed
to: [email protected].
    (2) Before using any approved AMOC, notify your appropriate
principal inspector, or lacking a principal inspector, the manager
of the responsible Flight Standards Office.
    (3) An AMOC that provides an acceptable level of safety may be
used for any repair, modification, or alteration required by this AD
if it is approved by The Boeing Company Organization Designation
Authorization (ODA) that has been authorized by the Manager, Los
Angeles ACO Branch, FAA, to make those findings. To be approved, the
repair method, modification deviation, or alteration deviation must
meet the certification basis of the airplane, and the approval must
specifically refer to this AD.
    (4) AMOCs approved for AD 2017-23-02 are approved as AMOCs for
the corresponding provisions of Boeing Alert Service Bulletin 737-
53A1358, Revision 1, dated February 26, 2021, that are required by
paragraph (h) of this AD.
    (5) Except as specified by paragraph (i)(2) of this AD: For
service information that contains steps that are labeled as Required
for Compliance (RC), the provisions of paragraphs (j)(5)(i) and (ii)
of this AD apply.
    (i) The steps labeled as RC, including substeps under an RC step
and any figures identified in an RC step, must be done to comply
with the AD. If a step or substep is labeled ``RC Exempt,'' then the
RC requirement is removed from that step or substep. An AMOC is
required for any deviations to RC steps, including substeps and
identified figures.
    (ii) Steps not labeled as RC may be deviated from using accepted
methods in accordance with the operator's maintenance or inspection
program without obtaining approval of an AMOC, provided the RC
steps, including substeps and identified figures, can still be done
as specified, and the airplane can be put back in an airworthy
condition.

(k) Related Information

    For more information about this AD, contact James Guo, Aerospace
Engineer, Airframe Section, FAA, Los Angeles ACO Branch, 3960
Paramount Boulevard, Lakewood, CA 90712-4137; phone:<PHONE_NUMBER>;
email: [email protected].

(l) Material Incorporated by Reference

    (1) The Director of the Federal Register approved the
incorporation by reference (IBR) of the service information listed
in this paragraph under 5 U.S.C. 552(a) and 1 CFR part 51.
    (2) You must use this service information as applicable to do
the actions required by this AD, unless the AD specifies otherwise.
    (i) Boeing Alert Service Bulletin 737-53A1358, Revision 1, dated
February 26, 2021.
    (ii) [Reserved]
    (3) For service information identified in this AD, contact
Boeing Commercial Airplanes, Attention: Contractual & Data Services
(C&DS), 2600 Westminster Blvd., MC 110-SK57, Seal Beach, CA 90740-
5600; telephone<PHONE_NUMBER>; internet https://www.myboeingfleet.com.
    (4) You may view this service information at the FAA,
Airworthiness Products Section, Operational Safety Branch, 2200
South 216th St., Des Moines, WA. For information on the availability
of this material at the FAA, call<PHONE_NUMBER>.
    (5) You may view this service information that is incorporated
by reference at the National Archives and Records Administration
(NARA). For information on the availability of this material at
NARA, email [email protected], or go to: https://www.archives.gov/federal-register/cfr/ibr-locations.html.

    Issued on November 30, 2021.
Lance T. Gant,
Director, Compliance & Airworthiness Division, Aircraft Certification
Service.
[FR Doc. 2022-00588 Filed 1-14-22; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910-13-P


[Federal Register Volume 77, Number 77 (Friday, April 20, 2012)]
[Notices]
[Page 23732]
[FR Doc No: 2012-9531]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES

Food and Drug Administration

[Docket No. FDA-2011-N-0511]

Agency Information Collection Activities; Announcement of Office
of Management and Budget Approval; Current Good Manufacturing Practices
and Related Regulations for Blood and Blood Components; and
Requirements for Donor Testing, Donor Notification, and ``Lookback''

AGENCY: Food and Drug Administration, HHS.

ACTION: Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Food and Drug Administration (FDA) is announcing that a
collection of information entitled ``Current Good Manufacturing
Practices and Related Regulations for Blood and Blood Components; and
Requirements for Donor Testing, Donor Notification, and ` Lookback' ''
has been approved by the Office of Management and Budget (OMB) under
the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Ila S. Mizrachi, Office of Information
Management, Food and Drug Administration, 1350 Piccard Dr., PI50-400B,
Rockville, MD 20850,<PHONE_NUMBER><EMAIL_ADDRESS>
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: On January 3, 2012, the Agency submitted a
proposed collection of information entitled ``Current Good
Manufacturing Practices and Related Regulations for Blood and Blood
Components; and Requirements for Donor Testing, Donor Notification, and
`Lookback' '' to OMB for review and clearance under 44 U.S.C. 3507. An
Agency may not conduct or sponsor, and a person is not required to
respond to, a collection of information unless it displays a currently
valid OMB control number. OMB has now approved the information
collection and has assigned OMB control number 0910-0116. The approval
expires on April 30, 2015. A copy of the supporting statement for this
information collection is available on the Internet at http://www.reginfo.gov/public/do/PRAMain.

    Dated: April 16, 2012.
Leslie Kux,
Assistant Commissioner for Policy.
[FR Doc. 2012-9531 Filed 4-19-12; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4160-01-P