[Federal Register Volume 82, Number 152 (Wednesday, August 9, 2017)]
[Notices]
[Pages 37245-37247]
[FR Doc No: 2017-16737]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

[Release No. 34-81303; File No. SR-NYSEArca-2017-83]

Self-Regulatory Organizations; NYSE Arca, Inc.; Notice of Filing
and Immediate Effectiveness of Proposed Rule Change Amending Rule 7.37

August 3, 2017.
    Pursuant to Section 19(b)(1) \1\ of the Securities Exchange Act of
1934 (the ``Act'') \2\ and Rule 19b-4 thereunder,\3\ notice is hereby
given that, on July 26, 2017, NYSE Arca, Inc. (the ``Exchange'' or
``NYSE Arca'') filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the
``Commission'') the proposed rule change as described in Items I and II
below, which Items have been prepared by the self-regulatory
organization. The Commission is publishing this notice to solicit
comments on the proposed rule change from interested persons.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \1\ 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(1).
    \2\ 15 U.S.C. 78a.
    \3\ 17 CFR 240.19b-4.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

I. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement of the Terms of Substance
of the Proposed Rule Change

    The Exchange proposes to [sic] Rule 7.37 (Order Execution and
Routing). The proposed rule change is available on the Exchange's Web
site at www.nyse.com, at the principal office of the Exchange, and at
the Commission's Public Reference Room.

II. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement of the Purpose of, and
Statutory Basis for, the Proposed Rule Change

    In its filing with the Commission, the self-regulatory organization
included statements concerning the purpose of, and basis for, the
proposed rule change and discussed any comments it received on the
proposed rule change. The text of those statements may be examined at
the places specified in Item IV below. The Exchange has prepared
summaries, set forth in sections A, B, and C below, of the most
significant parts of such statements.

A. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement of the Purpose of, and the
Statutory Basis for, the Proposed Rule Change

1. Purpose
    The Exchange proposes to amend Rule 7.37 (Order Execution and
Routing) to reflect changes to how the Exchange would process MOC/LOC
Orders \4\ routed to NYSE American LLC (``NYSE American'').\5\ Rule
7.37(b)(7)(C) provides that the Exchange rejects requests to cancel or
to reduce in size a Market-on-Close Order (``MOC Order'') or a Limit-
on-Close Order (``LOC Order'') in NYSE-listed securities or NYSE MKT-
listed securities (``NYSE American-listed securities'') \6\ that is
electronically entered after the time specified in NYSE Rules [sic]
123C(3)(b) and NYSE MKT Rule 123C(3)(b)--Equities (``NYSE American Rule
123C(3)(b)--Equities'') \7\ and Supplementary Material .40 to those
rules.\8\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \4\ A Market-on-Close Order is a Market Order that is to be
traded only during the Closing Auction and a Limit-on-Close Order is
a Limit Order that is to be traded only during the Closing Auction.
See Rule 7.31(c)(3) and (4). If the Exchange does not conduct a
closing auction in a UTP Security, the Exchange routes MOC/LOC
Orders in such a UTP Security to the primary listing market. See
Rule 7.34(c)(2)(B).
    \5\ On July 24, 2017, the Exchange's affiliate, NYSE MKT LLC,
transitioned to the Pillar trading platform and was renamed NYSE
American LLC. See Securities Exchange Act Release Nos. 79242
(November 4, 2016), 81 FR 79081 (November 10, 2016) (SR-NYSEMKT-
2016-97); 79400 (November 25, 2016), 81 FR 86750 (December 1, 2016)
(SR-NYSEMKT-2016-103); 80283 (March 21, 2017), 82 FR 15244 (March
27, 2017) (SR-NYSEMKT-2017-14); and 80748 (May 23, 2017), 82 FR
24764 (May 30, 2017) (SR-NYSEMKT-2017-20).
    \6\ See supra, note 5.
    \7\ See supra, note 5.
    \8\ NYSE Rule 123C(3)(b) and NYSE American Rule 123C(3)(b)--
Equities provide that between 3:45 p.m. and 3:58 p.m., MOC, LOC and
CO Orders may be cancelled or reduced in size to correct a
legitimate error, and NYSE Rule 123C(3)(c) and NYSE American Rule
123C(3)(c)--Equities provide that MOC, LOC and CO Orders may not be
cancelled or adjusted for any reason after 3:58 p.m. unless there is
an Extreme Order Imbalance at or Near the Close, as provided in NYSE
Rule 123C(9) and NYSE American Rule 123C(9)--Equities. Accordingly,
between 3:45 p.m. and 3:58 p.m., NYSE and NYSE American accept
requests to cancel MOC and LOC Orders.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    The Exchange proposes to amend Rule 7.37(b)(7)(C) to provide that
the Exchange would no longer reject requests to cancel or reduce in
size MOC/LOC Orders in NYSE American-listed securities. The Exchange is
enhancing functionality to coincide with the recent migration of NYSE
American to the Pillar trading system. On Pillar, NYSE American no
longer processes MOC or LOC Orders under NYSE American Rule 123C--
Equities and instead processes such orders under NYSE American Rule
7.35E.\9\ Because NYSE American will systemically enforce its
requirements by rejecting requests to cancel or requests to cancel

and replace \10\ a MOC or LOC Order in an NYSE American-listed
security, the Exchange will no longer need to monitor the trading
behavior on NYSE American. As a result, the Exchange proposes to accept
and route all requests to cancel or reduce in size MOC/LOC Orders in
NYSE American-listed securities, regardless of the time. The Exchange
believes that the proposed changes would provide transparency regarding
how requests to cancel orders or reduce in size would be processed on
the Exchange.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \9\ NYSE American Rule 7.35E(d)(2)(B) provides that when the
Closing Auction Imbalance Freeze begins, NYSE American will reject
requests to cancel and requests to cancel and replace MOC Orders and
LOC Orders.
    \10\ On the Pillar trading system, to reduce the size of an
order, an ETP Holder submits a request to cancel a portion of the
order.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    Because of technology changes associated with this proposed rule
change, the Exchange will announce the implementation date by Trader
Update, which the Exchange anticipates will be in the third quarter of
2017.
2. Statutory Basis
    The proposed rule change is consistent with Section 6(b) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (the ``Act''),\11\ in general, and
furthers the objectives of Section 6(b)(5),\12\ in particular, because
it is designed to prevent fraudulent and manipulative acts and
practices, to promote just and equitable principles of trade, to foster
cooperation and coordination with persons engaged in facilitating
transactions in securities, to remove impediments to, and perfect the
mechanism of, a free and open market and a national market system and,
in general, to protect investors and the public interest.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \11\ 15 U.S.C. 78f(b).
    \12\ 15 U.S.C. 78f(b)(5).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    Specifically, the Exchange believes that the proposed rule change
would promote just and equitable principles of trade, and remove
impediments to and perfect the mechanism of a free and open market and
a national market system by allowing the Exchange to accept and route
requests to cancel or reduce in size MOC Orders and LOC Orders in NYSE
American-listed securities regardless of the time. The Exchange
believes that the proposed change would remove impediments to and
perfect the mechanism of a free and open market and a national market
system because now that NYSE American has transitioned to Pillar, NYSE
American systemically enforces whether it accepts a request to cancel
or reduce in size a MOC or LOC Order, and the Exchange would no longer
need to monitor this functionality.
    The Exchange further believes that the proposed amendments to Rule
7.37(b)(7)(C) would remove impediments to and perfect the mechanism of
a free and open market and a national market system because the
proposed changes would provide greater clarity regarding how requests
to cancel or reduce in size MOC Orders and LOC Orders in NYSE American-
listed securities would be processed by the Exchange, thereby promoting
transparency and clarity in Exchange rules.

B. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement on Burden on Competition

    The Exchange does not believe that the proposed rule change will
impose any burden on competition that is not necessary or appropriate
in furtherance of the purposes of the Act. The proposed change is not
designed to address any competitive issue but rather to make amendments
to Rule 7.37 to reflect differences to how NYSE American processes
requests to cancel or reduce in size MOC and LOC Orders on the Pillar
trading system.

C. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement on Comments on the Proposed
Rule Change Received From Members, Participants, or Others

    No written comments were solicited or received with respect to the
proposed rule change.

III. Date of Effectiveness of the Proposed Rule Change and Timing for
Commission Action

    Because the foregoing proposed rule change does not: (i)
Significantly affect the protection of investors or the public
interest; (ii) impose any significant burden on competition; and (iii)
become operative for 30 days from the date on which it was filed, or
such shorter time as the Commission may designate, it has become
effective pursuant to Section 19(b)(3)(A) of the Act \13\ and Rule 19b-
4(f)(6) thereunder.\14\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \13\ 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(3)(A).
    \14\ 17 CFR 240.19b-4(f)(6). As required under Rule 19b-
4(f)(6)(iii), the Exchange provided the Commission with written
notice of its intent to file the proposed rule change, along with a
brief description and the text of the proposed rule change, at least
five business days prior to the date of filing of the proposed rule
change, or such shorter time as designated by the Commission.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    A proposed rule change filed pursuant to Rule 19b-4(f)(6) under the
Act \15\ normally does not become operative for 30 days after the date
of its filing. However, Rule 19b-4(f)(6)(iii) \16\ permits the
Commission to designate a shorter time if such action is consistent
with the protection of investors and the public interest. The Exchange
has asked the Commission to waive the 30-day operative delay so that
the proposal may become operative immediately upon filing. The Exchange
stated that NYSE American has transitioned to the Pillar trading
platform and now systemically enforces whether it accepts a request to
cancel or reduce in size a MOC or LOC order, so the Exchange no longer
needs to monitor this functionality. The Exchange also stated that
waiver of the 30-day operative delay would allow it to implement the
proposed rule change when the technology supporting the change becomes
available, which the Exchange anticipates to be less than 30 days after
the date of this filing. The Commission believes that waiving the 30-
day operative delay is consistent with the protection of investors and
the public interest. Therefore, the Commission hereby waives the
operative delay and designates the proposal operative upon filing.\17\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \15\ 17 CFR 240.19b-4(f)(6).
    \16\ 17 CFR 240.19b-4(f)(6)(iii).
    \17\ For purposes only of waiving the 30-day operative delay,
the Commission has also considered the proposed rule's impact on
efficiency, competition, and capital formation. See 15 U.S.C.
78c(f).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    At any time within 60 days of the filing of the proposed rule
change, the Commission summarily may temporarily suspend such rule
change if it appears to the Commission that such action is necessary or
appropriate in the public interest, for the protection of investors, or
otherwise in furtherance of the purposes of the Act. If the Commission
takes such action, the Commission shall institute proceedings to
determine whether the proposed rule change should be approved or
disapproved.

IV. Solicitation of Comments

    Interested persons are invited to submit written data, views, and
arguments concerning the foregoing, including whether the proposed rule
change is consistent with the Act. Comments may be submitted by any of
the following methods:

Electronic Comments

     Use the Commission's Internet comment form (http://www.sec.gov/rules/sro.shtml); or
     Send an email to<EMAIL_ADDRESS>Please include
File Number SR-NYSEArca-2017-83 on the subject line.

Paper Comments

     Send paper comments in triplicate to Brent J. Fields,
Secretary, Securities and Exchange Commission, 100 F Street NE.,
Washington, DC 20549-1090.

All submissions should refer to File Number SR-NYSEArca-2017-83. This
file number should be included on the

subject line if email is used. To help the Commission process and
review your comments more efficiently, please use only one method. The
Commission will post all comments on the Commission's Internet Web site
(http://www.sec.gov/rules/sro.shtml). Copies of the submission, all
subsequent amendments, all written statements with respect to the
proposed rule change that are filed with the Commission, and all
written communications relating to the proposed rule change between the
Commission and any person, other than those that may be withheld from
the public in accordance with the provisions of 5 U.S.C. 552, will be
available for Web site viewing and printing in the Commission's Public
Reference Room, 100 F Street NE., Washington, DC 20549 on official
business days between the hours of 10:00 a.m. and 3:00 p.m. Copies of
the filing also will be available for inspection and copying at the
principal office of the Exchange. All comments received will be posted
without change; the Commission does not edit personal identifying
information from submissions. You should submit only information that
you wish to make available publicly. All submissions should refer to
File Number SR-NYSEArca-2017-83 and should be submitted on or before
August 30, 2017.

    For the Commission, by the Division of Trading and Markets,
pursuant to delegated authority.\18\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \18\ 17 CFR 200.30-3(a)(12).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

Eduardo A. Aleman,
Assistant Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2017-16737 Filed 8-8-17; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 8011-01-P


(Lot/batch No. 078H06822 and 123K0376; purity >99%) for 28 days.
(Tyrosine supplementation was approximately three to five times the
normal dietary intake.)  Rats in Groups 3 and 4 received 10 μg/kg
bw/day 2-(2-nitro-4-trifluoromethyl-benzoyl)-1,3-cyclohexanedione
(NTBC), an inhibitor of 4-hydroxyphenylpyruvate dioxygenase, daily by
gavage.  The study was done to determine the effects of increased plasma
tyrosine to the eye, kidney, liver, pancreas, and thyroid of rats.

One Group 3 female rat died during the study, but its death was
unrelated to treatment.  No treatment-related effects were noted on body
weight, body weight gain, or food consumption.  Nine of ten male and
3/10 female rats in Group 4 (2% tyrosine + 10 µg/kg bw/day NTBC)
developed white areas on the eye between Days 23-26 on one or more
occasions.  Following opthalmoscopic examination prior to sacrifice,
9/10 male rats in Group 4 had developed corneal edema and all male and
3/10 female rats had developed “snow flake” corneal opacities.  In
addition, three Group 4 male rats had developed congestive iritis.  None
of the male and female rats in Group 2 (2% tyrosine) or Group 3 (10
µg/kg bw/day NTBC) developed ocular abnormalities.

The average plasma tyrosine concentration of Group 3 and Group 4 male
and female rats was markedly increased 18-23 fold on the day of
sacrifice, while plasma tyrosine was unaffected by treatment in Group 2
rats.

Although the liver to body weight ratio of male and female rats in Group
4 was statistically increased, no histological correlates were found.
No other treatment-related effects were noted on organ weight.
Microscopic treatment-related effects were found in the pancreas,
thyroid, and eyes of Group 4 rats.  The incidences of focal/multifocal
acinar atrophy/ fibrosis and/or acinar degeneration/apoptosis, as well
as the incidence of focal/multifocal or diffuse inflammation were
increased in the pancreas of Group 4 male and female rats.  In the
thyroid, an increased incidence of colloid alteration was found in male,
but not female rats of Group 4 rats.  In the eye, the incidence of
unilateral and bilateral keratitis was markedly increased in male rats
while minimal keratitis was found in 1/10 Group 4 female rats.  No
treatment-related effects were noted in male or female Group 2 and Group
3 rats.

This study suggests that male rats are more sensitive to treatment with
2% tyrosine + 10 μg/kg bw/day NTBC than female rats and that the eye
and thyroid are target organs for toxicity.

This subchronic study in the rat is Acceptable/Nonguideline.  The
relevance of the study to the chemical tembotrione was not explained.

A.4	References

46695703	Wason, S. (2003) AE 0172747:  Developmental toxicity study in
the rabbit by gavage.  Bayer CropScience, Sophia Antipolis Cedex,
France.  Laboratory Study Report: SA 02056, February 24, 2003.  MRID
46695703.  Unpublished.

46695704	Young, A.D., B.L. Fickbohm (2005) Technical Grade AE0172747:  A
two-generation reproductive toxicity study in the Wistar Rat.  Bayer
CropScience LP, Toxicology, Stilwell, KS.  Report No.: 201266, August
31, 2005.  MRID 46695704.  Unpublished.

46695705	Kennel, P. (2005) AE0172747 Chronic toxicity study in the dog
by dietary administration.  Bayer CropScience, Sophia Antipolis Cedex,
France.  Study Report No.: SA 03352, September 9, 2005.  MRID 46695705.
Unpublished.

46695706	Langrand-Lerche, C. (2005) Carcinogenicity study of AE 0172747
in the C57BL/6 Mouse by dietary administration.  Bayer CropScience,
Sophia Antipolis Cedex, France. Laboratory Study No.: SA 02256,
September 9, 2005.  MRID 46695706.  Unpublished.

46695707	Kennel, P. (2005) Chronic toxicity and carcinogenicity study of
AE 0172747 in the Wistar rat by dietary administration. Bayer
CropScience, 355, rue Dostoievski, BP 153, 06903 Sophia Antipolis Cedex,
France. Report of Study SA 02055, May 20, 2005. MRID 46695707.
Unpublished.

46695708	Kennel, P. (2005) Chronic toxicity and carcinogenicity study of
AE 0172747 in the male Wistar rat by dietary administration. Bayer
CropScience, 355, rue Dostoievski, BP 153, 06903 Sophia Antipolis Cedex,
France. Report of Study SA 02400, November 7, 2005. MRID 46695708.
Unpublished.

46695709	May, K. (2003). Technical AE0172747 Bacterial Reverse Mutation
Test. Huntingdon Life Sciences Ltd., Huntingdon, Great Britain.
Laboratory report number: AES 117/0230631, October 10, 2003. 46695709.
Unpublished.

46695710	Herbold, B. (2005). AE0456148 (Project:AE0172747)
Salmonella/microsome test -Plate incorporation and preincubation method;
Bayer HealthCare AG, Wuppertal, Germany. Report number: AT01610, June 9,
2005. MRID 46695710. Unpublished.

46695711	Wirnitzer, U. (2004). AE1417268 (Project:AE0172747)
Salmonella/Microsome Test (Plate Incorporation And Preincubation
Method); Bayer Healthcare AG, Wuppertal, Germany. Report number: AT1713,
December 16, 2004. MRID 46695711. Unpublished.

46695712	Wirnitzer, U. (2005). AE1392936 (project: AE0172747)
Salmonella/Microsome Test - Plate Incorporation and Preincubation
Method; Bayer HealthCare AG, Wuppertal, Germany. Report number: AT02552,
October 27, 2005. MRID 46695712. Unpublished.

46695713	May, K. (2005).  Technical AE0172747 – Mammalian Cell
Mutation Assay. Huntington Life Sciences Ltd., Cambridgeshire, Great
Britain. Report No.: AES119/024223.  MRID 46695713, January 25, 2005.
Unpublished

46695714	Herbold, B. (2004).  AE0456148 (Project: AE0172747) –
V79/HPRT-in vitro for the detection of induced forward mutations.  Bayer
Healthcare AG, Wuppertal, Germany. Report number: AT01738, December 10,
2004. MRID 46695714. Unpublished.

46695715		Lloyd, M. (2005).  AE1417268 – Mutation at the Thymidine
Kinase (Tk) Locus of Mouse Lymphoma L5178Y Cells (MLA) Using the
Microtitre Fluctuation Technique.  Covance Laboratories Ltd., Harrogate,
North Yorkshire, England. Report No.: 2014/89.  October 26, 2005. MRID
46695715. Unpublished.

46695716		Herbold, B. (2005).  AE1392936 (Project: AE0172747) –
V79/HPRT-in vitro for the detection of induced forward mutations.  Bayer
Healthcare AG, Wuppertal, Germany. Report number: AT02433, August 26,
2005. MRID 46695716. Unpublished.

46695717		Mason, C. (2004). Technical AE0172747 - In Vitro Mammalian
Chromosome Aberration Test in Human Lymphocytes. Huntingdon Life
Sciences Ltd., Huntingdon, Cambridgeshire, Great Britain. Report No.:
AES118/024021. January 6, 2004. MRID 46695717. Unpublished.

46695718	Herbold, B. (2005). AE0456148 (Project: AE0172747 - In vitro
Chromosome Aberration Test with Chinese Hamster V79 Cells. Bayer
HealthCare AG, Wuppertal, Germany. Report No.: AT01906. October 4, 2005.
MRID 46695718. Unpublished.

46695719		Kumaravel, T. S. (2005). AE1417268:  Induction of Chromosome
Aberrations in Cultured Human Peripheral Blood Lymphocytes. Covance
Laboratories Ltd., Harrogate, North Yorkshire, England. Report No.:
2014/88; October, 2005. MRID 46695719. Unpublished.

46695720		Thum, M. (2005). AE1392936 00 1C94 0001 (Project AE0172747)-
In vitro Chromosome Aberration Test with Chinese Hamster V79 Cells.
Bayer HealthCare, AG, Wuppertal, Germany. Report No.: AT02214. October
12, 2005. MRID 46695720. Unpublished.

46695721	Mehmood, Z. (2003).  Technical AE0172747- Mouse Micronucleus
Test. Huntingdon Life Sciences Ltd, Cambridgeshire, Great Britain.
Report No.: AES120/023519, October 27, 2003. MRID 46695721. Unpublished.

46695722		Wirnitzer, U. (2005).  AE 0172747 (Project: AE 0172747) -
Unscheduled DNA

				synthesis test with rat liver cells in vivo;  Bayer Healthcare AG,
Wuppertal, Germany.  Report No.: AT02169, July 1, 2005. MRID 46695722.
Unpublished.

46695723	Sheets, L.P., and R.G. Gilmore, (2005) An acute oral
neurotoxicity screening study with technical grade AE 0172747 in Wistar
rats.  Bayer CropScience LP, Stilwell, KS.  Laboratory Study No.:
03-N12-TB, April 5, 2005.  MRID 46695723.  Unpublished.

46695724	Gilmore, R.G. (2005) A subchronic neurotoxicity screening study
with technical grade AE 0172747 in Wistar rats.  Bayer CropScience LP,
Stilwell, KS.  Laboratory Study No.: 03-N72-PK, March 28, 2005.  MRID
46695724.  Unpublished.

46695725	Sheets, L.P., R.G. Gilmore, and H.E. Hoss (2005) A
developmental neurotoxicity screening study with technical grade AE
0172747 in Wistar rats.  Bayer CropScience LP, Stilwell, KS.  Laboratory
Study No.:  04-D72-UE, September 7, 2005.  MRID 46695725.  Unpublished.

46695726	Koester, J. (2005). [Cyclohexyl-UL-14C]AE 0172747:  rat
blood/plasma kinetics study.  Bayer CropScience AG, Development,
Metabolism/Environmental Fate, Monheim am Rhein, Germany.  Laboratory
Study No.:  M01819137, March 8, 2005.  MRID 46695726.  Unpublished

46695730	Odin-Feurtet, M.  (2005) AE 0172747 and isoxadifen-ethyl SC 420
+ 210 formulation:  in vivo dermal absorption study in the male rat.
Bayer CropScience, 355 rue Dostoïevski, Sophia Antipolis, France.
Laboratory Project ID:  SA 04079, January 13, 2005.  MRID 46695730.
Unpublished

46695731	Blanck, O. (2005) AE 0172747:  effects on blood coagulation
parameters with and without administration of vitamin K1.  Bayer
CropScience, 355, rue Dostoïevski, Sophia Antipolis Cedex, France.
Laboratory Study Report:  SA 04296, April 15, 2005.  MRID 46695731.
Unpublished.

46695732	Blanck, O. (2004) AE 0172747:  effect on blood tyrosine level
in pregnant rabbit after oral administration by gavage.  Bayer
CropScience, rue Dostoïevski, Sophia Antipolis, Cedex, France.
Laboratory Study No.:  SA 03315, June 15, 2004.  MRID 46695732.
Unpublished.

46695733	Totis, M. (2005) AE 1417268, AE 0456148, and AE 1392936:
assessment of HPPDase inhibition in the rat.  Bayer CropScience, Sophia
Antipolis Cedex, France.  Laboratory Study Report:  SA 04132, March 7,
2005.  MRID 46695733.  Unpublished.

46695638	Steiblen, G. (2005) AE 0172747 - 90-day toxicity study in the
rat by dietary

	administration.  Bayer CropScience, Sophia Antipolis, France; Report
No.:  SA

	01170, January 25, 2005. MRID 46695638.  Unpublished.

46695639	Kennel, P. (2005) AE 0172747 - 90-day toxicity study in the rat
by dietary

	administration.  Bayer CropScience, Sophia Antipolis, France; Report
No.:  SA 05002, October 28, 2005. MRID 46695639.  Unpublished.

46695640	Steiblen, G., (2003) AE 0172747:  90-day toxicity study in the
mouse by dietary

		administration.  Bayer CropScience, 355, rue Dostoïevski, Sophia
Antipolis

		Cedex, France. Laboratory Study No.: SA 01431, July 9, 2003.  MRID
46695640.

			Unpublished.

46695642	Eiben, R. (2005) AE 0456148:  Study on subchronic toxicity in
rats (administration in the diet for 3 months).  Bayer HealthCare AG,
Wuppertal, Germany.  Laboratory Study Report No.:  AT02191, July 18,
2005.  MRID 46695642.  Unpublished.

46695643	Kennel, P. (2004) AE 0172747 90-Day toxicity study in the dog
by dietary administration.  Bayer CropScience, Sophia Antipolis Cedex,
France.  Study Report No.: SA 02162, January 27, 2004.  MRID 46695643.
Unpublished.

46695645		Krötlinger, F. and L. Schladt (2005) Subacute toxicity study
in the rat (4 weeks dermal administration).  Bayer HealthCare AG,
Wuppertal, Germany.  Laboratory Study No.: T1075496, November 9, 2005.
MRID 46695645.  Unpublished.

47044502	Blanck, O.  (2006)  Effects of tyrosinaemia on selected organs
in rats.  Bayer CropScience 355, rud Dostoïevski, BP 153, 06903 Sophia
Antipolis Cedex, France.  Report Number SA 05330.  August 1, 2006.  MRID
47044502.  Unpublished.

47044503	Kennel, P. (2006) Effect of tyrosinaemia on pregnancy and
embryo-fetal development in the rat. Bayer CropScience, Sophia Antipolis
Cedex, France.  Laboratory study number SA 05192, January 13, 2006. MRID
47044503.  Unpublished.

47044504	Blanck, O. (2006) Effects of diets enriched with tyrosine on
selected organs in rats.  Bayer CropScience 355, rue Dostoïevski, BP
153, 06903 Sophia Antipolis Cedex, France.  Report Number SA 05207.
August 1, 2006.  MRID 47044504.  Unpublished.

Appendix B:  Metabolism Assessment  TC \l1 "Appendix B:  Metabolism
Assessment

B.1	Metabolism Guidance and Considerations TC \l2 "B.1	Metabolism
Guidance and Considerations   TC \l1 "Appendix B:  Metabolism Assessment
 TC \l2 "B.1	Metabolism Guidance and Considerations

Table B.2.		Tabular Summary of Metabolites and Degradates

Chemical Name (other names in parenthesis)

Matrix	Percent TRR (PPM)1	Structure

Matrices - Major Residue (>10%TRR)	Matrices - Minor Residue (<10%TRR)

	Tembotrione
(2-[2-Chloro-4-(methylsulfonyl)-3-[(2,2,2-trifluoroethoxy)methyl]benzoyl
]-1,3-cyclohexanedione)	Corn	-	-

	Rotational Crops	-	-

Ruminant	Kidney, Liver

	Poultry	Tissues, Eggs

	Rat	Excreta

	Water	yes

M5

(2-[2-Chloro-4-(methylsulfonyl)-3-[2,2,2-trifluoroethoxy)methyl]benzoyl]
-4,6-dihydroxycyclohexan-1,3-dione)	Corn

Forage, Stover, Grain

	Rotational Crops

Ruminant	-	-

Poultry	-	-

Rat	-	-

Water	-	-

	M6

(2-Chloro-4-mesyl-3-[(2,2,2-trifluoroethoxy)

methyl]benzoic acid)	Corn	Forage, Stover, Grain

	Rotational Crops	Swiss chard, Turnip tops & roots; Wheat forage, hay,
straw, & grain

	Ruminant	-	-

Poultry	-	-

Rat

Excreta

Water	maximum 96%

M10

	Rotational Crops	-	-

Ruminant	-	-

Poultry	-	-

Rat	Excreta

	Water	-	-

	M2

	Rotational Crops	Wheat forage, hay, straw, & grain	Turnip roots

Ruminant	-

	Poultry	-	-

Rat	-	-

Water	maximum 17%

Corn (phenyl-label), 46695530; 0.181 lb ai/A; 1.1X rate; growth stage
BBCH 12-14; 84 days (forage); and maturity, 124 days (stover and grain).

Cow (PH label); 46695532; 8.01 ppm; 6.8X MTDB; 7 days; 23 hour PSI

Hen (PH label); 46695534; 11.33 ppm; 470X MTDB; 14 days; 24 hour PSI

Rotational Crops; 46695612; Swiss chard, turnips, and spring wheat;
1.2X, applied to bare soil;90-day PBI

Rat Metabolism; 5 or 1000 mg gavage dose; Wistar, 168-hour depuration.

	T1/2 = 10.5 days	T1/2 = 257 days	T1/2 = 5.9 days (CA)	T1/2 = 62.4 days
T1/2 = 448 days	Aqueous: stable	stable @ pH 5, 7, and 9 at 25 ºC for 30
days

	T1/2 = 72-131 days (NC)

	Soil: T1/2 = 29-32 d

	AE 0456148 (M6)

	72.4% @ 14 days	41.6% @ 120 days	maximum of 36.1% (CA)	95.2% @ 141 days
maximum of 2.4%

	maximum of 25.8% days (NC)

	Soil: 22.0% @ 9 days

AE 0968400

	14.4% @ 35 days

	maximum 4.4%

maximum 6.1% (NC)

	AE 1124336

	maximum 2.6%

	maximum 0.8% (NC)

	AE 1392936 (M2)

maximum of 17.1% (NC)

	AE 1392936 (glutaric acid)

Aqueous: 6.8% @ 10 days

	Soil: 13.8% @ 3 day

	AE 0941989

Soil: 17.9% @ 1 day; 15.3% @ 3 days

	Study MRID No.	46695414

46695416	46695420	46695425	46695422	46695423	Aqueous: 46695411

Soil: 46695412, 46695413	46695410

Appendix C:  Tolerance Reassessment Summary and Table TC \l1 "Appendix
C:  Tolerance Reassessment Summary and Table

Table C.1.  Tolerance Summary for Tembotrione.

 hT

 hT

 ht

 hÑ

 hÑ

 hÑ

 hÑ

 hù

 hù

Ø	@

¨

Ø	@

¨

 hû

Ø	@

¨\

 hù

 hù

 hù

@

@

$

@

ž

ਁ攃愀϶e瑹ḋ#Ȁ

h

@

$

@

@

@

h

愀Ĥ摧碛

$

愀Ĥ摧碛

愀Ĥ摧碛

愀Ĥ摧碛

愀Ĥ摧碛

愀Ĥ摧碛

愀Ĥ摧碛

愀Ĥ摧碛

愀Ĥ摧碛

愀Ĥ摧碛

愀Ĥ摧碛

愀Ĥ摧碛

愀Ĥ摧碛

愀Ĥ摧碛

愀Ĥ摧碛

愀Ĥ摧碛

愀Ĥ摧碛

愀Ĥ摧碛

0.07	0.07	Horse, meat byproducts, except liver

Horse, meat by products	0.5	0.40	Horse, liver

Additional Livestock Commodity Tolerance That Needs to be Established

Poultry, liver	None	0.07

  PAGE  30   NUMPAGES  105   NUMPAGES  105

 PAGE

Page   PAGE  1  of   NUMPAGES  105

Page   PAGE  4  of   NUMPAGES  105

Page   PAGE  103  of   NUMPAGES  105

Page   PAGE  105  of   NUMPAGES  105

O

O

O

Cl

O

C

F

3

S

O

2

C

H

3

O

H


[Federal Register: September 3, 2010 (Volume 75, Number 171)]
[Proposed Rules]
[Page 54057-54058]
[DOCID:fr03se10-23]

=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION

Federal Aviation Administration

14 CFR Part 71

[Docket No. FAA-2010-0719; Airspace Docket No. 10-ANM-8]

Proposed Modification of Class E Airspace; Portland, OR

AGENCY: Federal Aviation Administration (FAA), DOT.

ACTION: Notice of proposed rulemaking (NPRM).

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: This action proposes to modify Class E airspace at Portland
International Airport, Portland, OR. Additional controlled airspace is
necessary to accommodate aircraft using the Localizer/Distance
Measuring Equipment (LOC/DME) for Standard Instrument Approach
Procedures (SIAPs) at Portland International Airport, Portland, OR. The
FAA is proposing this action to enhance the safety and management of
Instrument Flight Rules (IFR) operations at the airport.

DATES: Comments must be received on or before October 18, 2010.

ADDRESSES: Send comments on this proposal to the U.S. Department of
Transportation, Docket Operations, M-30, West Building Ground Floor,
Room W12-140, 1200 New Jersey Avenue, SE., Washington, DC 20590;
telephone<PHONE_NUMBER>. You must identify FAA Docket No. FAA-2010-
0719; Airspace Docket No. 10-ANM-8, at the beginning of your comments.
You may also submit comments through the Internet at http://
www.regulations.gov.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Eldon Taylor, Federal Aviation
Administration, Operations Support Group, Western Service Center, 1601
Lind Avenue, SW., Renton, WA 98057; telephone<PHONE_NUMBER>.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

Comments Invited

    Interested parties are invited to participate in this proposed
rulemaking by submitting such written data, views, or arguments, as
they may desire. Comments that provide the factual basis supporting the
views and suggestions presented are particularly helpful in developing
reasoned regulatory decisions on the proposal. Comments are
specifically invited on the overall regulatory, aeronautical, economic,
environmental, and energy-related aspects of the proposal.
    Communications should identify both docket numbers (FAA Docket No.
FAA 2010-0719 and Airspace Docket No. 10-ANM-8) and be submitted in
triplicate to the Docket Management System (see ADDRESSES section for
address and phone number). You may also submit comments through the
Internet at http://www.regulations.gov.
    Commenters wishing the FAA to acknowledge receipt of their comments
on this action must submit with those comments a self-addressed stamped
postcard on which the following statement is made: ``Comments to FAA
Docket No. FAA-2010-0719 and Airspace Docket No. 10-ANM-8''. The
postcard will be date/time stamped and returned to the commenter.
    All communications received on or before the specified closing date
for comments will be considered before taking action on the proposed
rule. The proposal contained in this action may be changed in light of
comments received. All comments submitted will be available for
examination in the public docket both before and after the closing date
for comments. A report summarizing each substantive public contact with
FAA personnel concerned with this rulemaking will be filed in the
docket.

Availability of NPRMs

    An electronic copy of this document may be downloaded through the
Internet at http://www.regulations.gov. Recently published rulemaking
documents can also be accessed through the FAA's web page at http://
www.faa.gov/airports_airtraffic/air_traffic/publications/airspace_
amendments/.
    You may review the public docket containing the proposal, any
comments received, and any final disposition in person in the Dockets
Office (see the ADDRESSES section for the address and phone number)
between 9 a.m. and 5 p.m., Monday through Friday, except federal
holidays. An informal docket may also be examined during normal
business hours at the Northwest Mountain Regional Office of the Federal
Aviation Administration, Air Traffic Organization, Western Service
Center, Operations Support Group, 1601 Lind Avenue, SW., Renton, WA
98057.
    Persons interested in being placed on a mailing list for future
NPRMs should contact the FAA's Office of Rulemaking,<PHONE_NUMBER>,
for a copy of Advisory Circular No. 11-2A, Notice of Proposed
Rulemaking Distribution System, which describes the application
procedure.

The Proposal

    The FAA is proposing an amendment to Title 14 Code of Federal
Regulations (14 CFR) Part 71 by modifying Class E airspace extending
upward from 700 feet above the surface at Portland International
Airport, Portland, OR. Controlled airspace is necessary to accommodate
aircraft using the LOC/DME SIAPs at Portland International Airport, and
to further the safety and management of IFR operations at the airport.
    Class E airspace designations are published in paragraph 6005, of
FAA Order 7400.9T, signed August 27, 2009, and effective September 15,
2009, which is incorporated by reference in 14 CFR 71.1. The Class E
airspace designation listed in this document will be published
subsequently in this Order.
    The FAA has determined this proposed regulation only involves an
established body of technical regulations for which frequent and
routine amendments are necessary to keep them operationally current.
Therefore, this proposed regulation; (1) is not a ``significant
regulatory action'' under Executive Order 12866; (2) is not a
``significant rule'' under DOT Regulatory Policies and Procedures (44
FR 11034; February 26, 1979); and (3) does not warrant preparation of a
regulatory evaluation as the anticipated impact is so minimal. Since
this is a routine matter that will only affect air traffic procedures
and air navigation, it is certified this proposed rule, when
promulgated, would not have a significant economic impact on a
substantial number of small entities under the criteria of the
Regulatory Flexibility Act.
    The FAA's authority to issue rules regarding aviation safety is
found in Title 49 of the U.S. Code. Subtitle 1, Section 106, describes
the authority for the FAA Administrator. Subtitle VII, Aviation
Programs, describes in more detail the scope of the agency's authority.
This rulemaking is promulgated under the authority described in
Subtitle VII, Part A, Subpart I, Section 40103. Under that section, the
FAA is charged with prescribing regulations to assign the use of the
airspace necessary to ensure the safety of aircraft and the efficient
use of airspace. This regulation is within the scope of that authority
as it would establish additional controlled airspace at Portland
International Airport, Portland, OR.

List of Subjects in 14 CFR Part 71

    Airspace, Incorporation by reference, Navigation (air).

The Proposed Amendment

    Accordingly, pursuant to the authority delegated to me, the Federal

Aviation Administration proposes to amend 14 CFR Part 71 as follows:

PART 71--DESIGNATION OF CLASS A, B, C, D AND E AIRSPACE AREAS; AIR
TRAFFIC SERVICE ROUTES; AND REPORTING POINTS

    1. The authority citation for 14 CFR Part 71 continues to read as
follows:

    Authority:  49 U.S.C. 106(g), 40103, 40113, 40120; E.O. 10854,
24 FR 9565, 3 CFR, 1959-1963 Comp., p. 389.

Sec.  71.1  [Amended]

    2. The incorporation by reference in 14 CFR Part 71.1 of the FAA
Order 7400.9T, Airspace Designations and Reporting Points, signed
August 27, 2009, and effective September 15, 2009 is amended as
follows:

Paragraph 6005 Class E airspace areas extending upward from 700
feet or more above the surface of the earth.

* * * * *

ANM OR E5 Portland, OR [Modified]

Portland International Airport, OR
    (Lat. 45[deg]35'19'' N., long. 122[deg]35'51'' W.)
Newburg VORTAC
    (Lat. 45[deg]21'12'' N., long. 122[deg]58'41'' W.)
Corvallis VOR/DME
    (Lat. 45[deg]29'58'' N., long. 123[deg]17'37'' W.)
McMinnville Municipal Airport, OR
    (Lat. 45[deg]11'40'' N., long. 123[deg]08'09'' W.)

    That airspace extending upward from 700 feet above the surface
within a line beginning at lat. 45[deg]59'59'' N., long.
123[deg]30'04'' W.; to lat. 46[deg]00'00'' N., long. 122[deg]13'00''
W.; thence via an 8.5-mile radius centered at lat. 45[deg]55'07''
N., long. 122[deg]03'02'' W. clockwise to lat. 45[deg]46'39'' N.,
long. 122[deg]04'00'' W.; thence via a line south along long.
122[deg]04'00'' W. bounded on the south by lat. 45[deg]09'59'' N.,
and on the west by long. 123[deg]30'04'' W.; and within a 4.3-mile
radius of the McMinnville Municipal Airport; and within 2 miles each
side of the Newburg VORTAC 215[deg] radial extending from lat.
45[deg]09'59'' N., to 19.8 miles southwest of the Newburg VORTAC;
that airspace extending upward from 1,200 feet above the surface
bounded on the north by lat. 46[deg]30'29'' N., extending from 2.7
miles offshore to V-25, and on the east by V-25, on the south by V-
536 to Corvallis VOR/DME; thence via lat. 44[deg]29'59'' N., to a
point 2.7 miles offshore, and on the west by a line 2.7 miles
offshore to the point of beginning.

    Issued in Seattle, Washington, on August 27, 2010.
John Warner,
Manager, Operations Support Group, Western Service Center.
[FR Doc. 2010-22099 Filed 9-2-10; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910-13-P


[Federal Register Volume 88, Number 145 (Monday, July 31, 2023)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Pages 49292-49294]
[FR Doc No: 2023-16165]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY

Coast Guard

33 CFR Part 165

[Docket Number USCG-2023-0490]
RIN 1625-AA00

Safety Zone; Mercury Powerboat Race; Sheboygan Harbor, Sheboygan,
Wisconsin

AGENCY: Coast Guard, DHS.

ACTION: Temporary final rule.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Coast Guard is establishing two temporary safety zones in
Lake Michigan for certain navigable waters in and around Sheboygan
Harbor in Sheboygan, WI. The safety zones are needed to protect
personnel, vessels, and the marine environment from potential hazards
association from the Mercury Powerboat Race event. This rule will
prohibit persons and vessels from entering the safety zones unless
authorized by the Captain of the Port Lake Michigan or a designated
representative.

DATES: This rule is effective from 8 a.m. on August 11 to 6:30 p.m. on
August 13, 2023.

ADDRESSES: To view documents mentioned in this preamble as being
available in the docket, go to https://www.regulations.gov, type USCG-
2023-0490 in the search box and click ``Search.'' Next, in the Document
Type column, select ``Supporting & Related Material.''

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: If you have questions about this
proposed rulemaking, call or email Sector Lake Michigan Waterways
Management Division, U.S. Coast Guard; telephone<PHONE_NUMBER>, email
[email protected].

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

I. Table of Abbreviations

CFR Code of Federal Regulations
DHS Department of Homeland Security
FR Federal Register
NPRM Notice of proposed rulemaking
Sec.  Section
U.S.C. United States Code
COTP Caption of the Port

II. Background Information and Regulatory History

    The Coast Guard is issuing this temporary rule without prior notice
and opportunity to comment pursuant to authority under section 4(a) of
the Administrative Procedure Act (APA) (5 U.S.C. 553(b)). This
provision authorizes an agency to issue a rule without prior notice and
opportunity to comment when the agency, for good cause, finds that
those procedures are ``impracticable, unnecessary, or contrary to the
public interest.'' Under 5 U.S.C. 553(b)(B), the Coast Guard finds that
good cause exists for not publishing a notice of proposed rulemaking
(NPRM) with respect to this rule because insufficient time remains
before the event to publish an NPRM and receive public comments prior
to the event.
    Under 5 U.S.C. 553(d)(3), the Coast Guard finds that good cause
exists for making this rule effective less than 30 days after
publication in the Federal Register. Delaying the effective date of
this rule to wait for a comment period to run would be contrary to the
public interest by inhibiting the Coast Guard's ability to protect
personnel, vessels, and the marine environment in these navigable
waters during the race events.

III. Legal Authority and Need for Rule

    The Coast Guard is issuing this rule under authority in 46 U.S.C.
70034 (previously 33 U.S.C. 1231). The COTP Lake Michigan has
determined a safety zone is needed to protect the public from potential
hazards association from the Mercury Powerboat Race event.

IV. Discussion of the Rule

    The COTP is establishing two safety zones from 8:00 a.m. on August
11 to 6:30 p.m. on August 13, 2023. One of the safety zones will be
located offshore of Sheboygan, WI and will cover all navigable waters
within the offshore course located within the following coordinates: NW
corner 43[deg]44'54.32'' N 87[deg]42'5.77'' W, NE corner
43[deg]44'54.10'' N 87[deg]41'3.21'' W, SW corner, 43[deg]42'27.10'' N
87[deg]42'10.11'' W, SE corner 43[deg]42'26.73'' N 87[deg]40'54.66'' W.
The other safety zone will be in a triangular area within Sheboygan
Harbor and will cover all navigable waters within the following
coordinates: 43[deg]44'56.76'' N 87[deg]41'05.60'' W, 43[deg]45'07.29''
N 87[deg]41'51.07'' W, 43[deg]44'57.24'' N 87[deg]42'05.24'' W. The
duration of the zones is intended to protect personnel, vessels, and
the marine environment in these navigable waters during the race
events. Entry into, transiting, or anchoring within the safety zone is
prohibited unless authorized by the COTP or a designated
representative.

V. Regulatory Analyses

    We developed this rule after considering numerous statutes and
Executive orders related to rulemaking. Below we summarize our analyses
based on a number of these statutes and Executive orders, and we
discuss First Amendment rights of protestors.

A. Regulatory Planning and Review

    Executive Orders 12866 and 13563 direct agencies to assess the
costs and benefits of available regulatory alternatives and, if
regulation is necessary, to select regulatory approaches that maximize
net benefits. This rule has not been designated a ``significant
regulatory action,'' under section 3(f) of Executive Order 12866, as
amended by Executive Order 14094 (Modernizing Regulatory Review).
Accordingly, this rule has not been reviewed by the Office of
Management and Budget (OMB).
    This regulatory action determination is based the need to ensure
the safety of public during the powerboat race event.

B. Impact on Small Entities

    The Regulatory Flexibility Act of 1980, 5 U.S.C. 601-612, as
amended,

requires Federal agencies to consider the potential impact of
regulations on small entities during rulemaking. The term ``small
entities'' comprises small businesses, not-for-profit organizations
that are independently owned and operated and are not dominant in their
fields, and governmental jurisdictions with populations of less than
50,000. The Coast Guard certifies under 5 U.S.C. 605(b) that this rule
will not have a significant economic impact on a substantial number of
small entities.
    While some owners or operators of vessels intending to transit the
safety zone may be small entities, for the reasons stated in section
V.A above, this rule will not have a significant economic impact on any
vessel owner or operator.
    Under section 213(a) of the Small Business Regulatory Enforcement
Fairness Act of 1996 (Pub. L. 104-121), we want to assist small
entities in understanding this rule. If the rule would affect your
small business, organization, or governmental jurisdiction and you have
questions concerning its provisions or options for compliance, please
call or email the person listed in the FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT
section.
    Small businesses may send comments on the actions of Federal
employees who enforce, or otherwise determine compliance with, Federal
regulations to the Small Business and Agriculture Regulatory
Enforcement Ombudsman and the Regional Small Business Regulatory
Fairness Boards. The Ombudsman evaluates these actions annually and
rates each agency's responsiveness to small business. If you wish to
comment on actions by employees of the Coast Guard, call 1-888-REG-FAIR
(1-888-734-3247). The Coast Guard will not retaliate against small
entities that question or complain about this rule or any policy or
action of the Coast Guard.

C. Collection of Information

    This rule will not call for a new collection of information under
the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 (44 U.S.C. 3501-3520).

D. Federalism and Indian Tribal Governments

    A rule has implications for federalism under Executive Order 13132,
Federalism, if it has a substantial direct effect on the States, on the
relationship between the National Government and the States, or on the
distribution of power and responsibilities among the various levels of
Government. We have analyzed this rule under that order and have
determined that it is consistent with the fundamental federalism
principles and preemption requirements described in Executive Order
13132.
    Also, this rule does not have tribal implications under Executive
Order 13175, Consultation and Coordination with Indian Tribal
Governments, because it does not have a substantial direct effect on
one or more Indian Tribes, on the relationship between the Federal
Government and Indian tribes, or on the distribution of power and
responsibilities between the Federal Government and Indian tribes.

E. Unfunded Mandates Reform Act

    The Unfunded Mandates Reform Act of 1995 (2 U.S.C. 1531-1538)
requires Federal agencies to assess the effects of their discretionary
regulatory actions. In particular, the Act addresses actions that may
result in the expenditure by a State, local, or tribal government, in
the aggregate, or by the private sector of $100,000,000 (adjusted for
inflation) or more in any one year. Though this rule will not result in
such an expenditure, we do discuss the effects of this rule elsewhere
in this preamble.

F. Environment

    We have analyzed this rule under Department of Homeland Security
Directive 023-01, Rev. 1, associated implementing instructions, and
Environmental Planning COMDTINST 5090.1 (series), which guide the Coast
Guard in complying with the National Environmental Policy Act of 1969
(42 U.S.C. 4321-4370f), and have determined that this action is one of
a category of actions that do not individually or cumulatively have a
significant effect on the human environment. This rule involves
establishment of a temporary safety zone intended to ensure the safety
of participants in these navigable waters before, during, and after the
swim portion of the Tri CLE Rock Roll Run triathlon. It is
categorically excluded from further review under paragraph L63(b) of
Appendix A, Table 1 of DHS Instruction Manual 023-01-001-01, Rev. 1. A
Record of Environmental Consideration supporting this determination is
available in the docket. For instructions on locating the docket, see
the ADDRESSES section of this preamble.

G. Protest Activities

    The Coast Guard respects the First Amendment rights of protesters.
Protesters are asked to call or email the person listed in the FOR
FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT section to coordinate protest activities so
that your message can be received without jeopardizing the safety or
security of people, places, or vessels.

List of Subjects in 33 CFR Part 165

    Harbors, Marine safety, Navigation (water), Reporting and
recordkeeping requirements, Security measures, Waterways.

    For the reasons discussed in the preamble, the Coast Guard amends
33 CFR part 165 as follows:

PART 165--REGULATED NAVIGATION AREAS AND LIMITED ACCESS AREAS

0
1. The authority citation for part 165 continues to read as follows:

    Authority:  46 U.S.C. 70034, 70051, 70124; 33 CFR 1.05-1, 6.04-
1, 6.04-6, and 160.5; Department of Homeland Security Delegation No.
00170.1, Revision No. 01.3

0
2. Add Sec.  165.T09-0490 to read as follows:

Sec.  165.T09-0490  Safety Zone; Mercury Powerboat Race; Sheboygan
Harbor, Sheboygan, Wisconsin

    (a) Location. All navigable waters within the offshore course
located within the following coordinates: NW corner 43[deg]44'54.32'' N
87[deg]42'5.77'' W, NE corner 43[deg]44'54.10'' N 87[deg]41'3.21'' W,
SW corner, 43[deg]42'27.10'' N 87[deg]42'10.11'' W, SE corner
43[deg]42'26.73'' N 87[deg]40'54.66'' W, and all navigable waters
located in a triangular area within Sheboygan Harbor within the
following coordinates: 43[deg]44'56.76'', N 87[deg]41'05.60'' W,
43[deg]45'07.29'' N 87[deg]41'51.07'' W, 43[deg]44'57.24'' N
87[deg]42'05.24'' W.
    (b) Enforcement Period. 8 a.m. on August 11 to 6:30 p.m. on August
13, 2023
    (c) Regulations.
    (1) In accordance with the general regulations in Sec.  165.23,
entry, transiting, or anchoring within this safety zones are prohibited
unless authorized by the Captain of the Port Lake Michigan (COTP) or a
designated representative.
    (2) These safety zones are closed to all vessel traffic, except as
may be permitted by the COTP or a designated representative.
    (3) The ``designated representative'' of the COTP is any Coast
Guard commissioned, warrant, or petty officer who has been designated
by the COTP to act on his or her behalf.
    (4) Persons and vessel operators desiring to enter or operate
within the safety zones must contact the COTP or an on-scene
representative to obtain permission to do so. The COTP or an on-scene
representative may be contacted via VHF Channel 16. Vessel operators
given permission to enter or operate in the safety zones must comply

with all directions given to them by the COTP or an on-scene
representative.

    Dated: July 25, 2023.
Joseph B. Parker,
Captain, U.S. Coast Guard, Captain of the Port Lake Michigan.
[FR Doc. 2023-16165 Filed 7-28-23; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 9110-04-P