[Federal Register: October 7, 2009 (Volume 74, Number 193)]
[Notices]
[Page 51579]
[DOCID:fr07oc09-51]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission

[Docket No. ER09-1729-000]

Connectiv Mid Merit, LLC; Supplemental Notice That Initial
Market-Based Rate Filing Includes Request for Blanket Section 204
Authorization

September 29, 2009.
    This is a supplemental notice in the above-referenced proceeding of
Connectiv Mid Merit, LLC's application for market-based rate authority,
with an accompanying rate tariff, noting that such application includes
a request for blanket authorization, under 18 CFR part 34, of future
issuances of securities and assumptions of liability.
    Any person desiring to intervene or to protest should file with the
Federal Energy Regulatory Commission, 888 First Street, NE.,
Washington, DC 20426, in accordance with Rules 211 and 214 of the
Commission's Rules of Practice and Procedure (18 CFR 385.211 and
385.214). Anyone filing a motion to intervene or protest must serve a
copy of that document on the Applicant.
    Notice is hereby given that the deadline for filing protests with
regard to the applicant's request for blanket authorization, under 18
CFR part 34, of future issuances of securities and assumptions of
liability, is October 19, 2009.
    The Commission encourages electronic submission of protests and
interventions in lieu of paper, using the FERC Online links at http://
www.ferc.gov. To facilitate electronic service, persons with Internet
access who will eFile a document and/or be listed as a contact for an
intervenor must create and validate an eRegistration account using the
eRegistration link. Select the eFiling link to log on and submit the
intervention or protests.
    Persons unable to file electronically should submit an original and
14 copies of the intervention or protest to the Federal Energy
Regulatory Commission, 888 First St., NE., Washington, DC 20426.
    The filings in the above-referenced proceeding are accessible in
the Commission's eLibrary system by clicking on the appropriate link in
the above list. They are also available for review in the Commission's
Public Reference Room in Washington, DC. There is an eSubscription link
on the Web site that enables subscribers to receive e-mail notification
when a document is added to a subscribed dockets(s). For assistance
with any FERC Online service, please e-mail<EMAIL_ADDRESS>
or call<PHONE_NUMBER> (toll free). For TTY, call<PHONE_NUMBER>.

Nathaniel J. Davis, Sr.,
Deputy Secretary.
[FR Doc. E9-24117 Filed 10-6-09; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 6717-01-P


[Federal Register Volume 87, Number 211 (Wednesday, November 2, 2022)]
[Notices]
[Pages 66194-66195]
[FR Doc No: 2022-23791]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES

Food and Drug Administration

[Docket No. FDA-2022-D-2336]

Assessing User Fees Under the Over-the-Counter Monograph Drug
User Fee Program; Draft Guidance for Industry; Availability

AGENCY: Food and Drug Administration, HHS.

ACTION: Notice of availability.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Food and Drug Administration (FDA or Agency) is announcing
the availability of a draft guidance for industry entitled ``Assessing
User Fees Under the Over-the-Counter Monograph Drug User Fee Program.''
This guidance provides stakeholders with information regarding FDA's
implementation of the Over-the-Counter Monograph Drug User Fee Program
authorized under the Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act (FD&C Act).

DATES: Submit either electronic or written comments on the draft
guidance by January 3, 2023 to ensure that the Agency considers your
comment on this draft guidance before it begins work on the final
version of the guidance.

ADDRESSES: You may submit comments on any guidances at any time as
follows:

Electronic Submissions

    Submit electronic comments in the following way:
     Federal eRulemaking Portal: https://www.regulations.gov.
Follow the instructions for submitting comments. Comments submitted
electronically, including attachments, to https://www.regulations.gov
will be posted to the docket unchanged. Because your comment will be
made public, you are solely responsible for ensuring that your comment
does not include any confidential information that you or a third party
may not wish to be posted, such as medical information, your or anyone
else's Social Security number, or confidential business information,
such as a manufacturing process. Please note that if you include your
name, contact information, or other information that identifies you in
the body of your comments, that information will be posted on https://www.regulations.gov.
     If you want to submit a comment with confidential
information that you do not wish to be made available to the public,
submit the comment as a written/paper submission and in the manner
detailed (see ``Written/Paper Submissions'' and ``Instructions'').

Written/Paper Submissions

    Submit written/paper submissions as follows:
     Mail/Hand Delivery/Courier (for written/paper
submissions): Dockets Management Staff (HFA-305), Food and Drug
Administration, 5630 Fishers Lane, Rm. 1061, Rockville, MD 20852.
     For written/paper comments submitted to the Dockets
Management Staff, FDA will post your comment, as well as any
attachments, except for information submitted, marked and identified,
as confidential, if submitted as detailed in ``Instructions.''
    Instructions: All submissions received must include the Docket No.
FDA-2022-D-2336 for ``Assessing User Fees Under the Over-the-Counter
Monograph Drug User Fee Program.'' Received comments will be placed in
the docket and, except for those submitted as ``Confidential
Submissions,'' publicly viewable at https://www.regulations.gov or at
the Dockets Management Staff between 9 a.m. and 4 p.m., Monday through
Friday,<PHONE_NUMBER>.
     Confidential Submissions--To submit a comment with
confidential

information that you do not wish to be made publicly available, submit
your comments only as a written/paper submission. You should submit two
copies total. One copy will include the information you claim to be
confidential with a heading or cover note that states ``THIS DOCUMENT
CONTAINS CONFIDENTIAL INFORMATION.'' The Agency will review this copy,
including the claimed confidential information, in its consideration of
comments. The second copy, which will have the claimed confidential
information redacted/blacked out, will be available for public viewing
and posted on https://www.regulations.gov. Submit both copies to the
Dockets Management Staff. If you do not wish your name and contact
information to be made publicly available, you can provide this
information on the cover sheet and not in the body of your comments and
you must identify this information as ``confidential.'' Any information
marked as ``confidential'' will not be disclosed except in accordance
with 21 CFR 10.20 and other applicable disclosure law. For more
information about FDA's posting of comments to public dockets, see 80
FR 56469, September 18, 2015, or access the information at: https://www.govinfo.gov/content/pkg/FR-2015-09-18/pdf/2015-23389.pdf.
    Docket: For access to the docket to read background documents or
the electronic and written/paper comments received, go to https://www.regulations.gov and insert the docket number, found in brackets in
the heading of this document, into the ``Search'' box and follow the
prompts and/or go to the Dockets Management Staff, 5630 Fishers Lane,
Rm. 1061, Rockville, MD 20852,<PHONE_NUMBER>.
    You may submit comments on any guidance at any time (see 21 CFR
10.115(g)(5)).
    Submit written requests for single copies of this draft guidance to
the Division of Drug Information, Center for Drug Evaluation and
Research, Food and Drug Administration, 10001 New Hampshire Ave.,
Hillandale Building, 4th Floor, Silver Spring, MD 20993-0002. Send one
self-addressed adhesive label to assist that office in processing your
requests. See the SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION section for electronic
access to the draft guidance document.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Over-the-Counter Monograph Drug User
Fee Staff, Division of User Fee Management, Office of Management,
Center for Drug Evaluation and Research, Food and Drug Administration,
10001 New Hampshire Ave., Silver Spring, MD 20993,<PHONE_NUMBER>,
[email protected].

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

I. Background

    FDA is announcing the availability of a draft guidance for industry
entitled ``Assessing User Fees Under the Over-the-Counter Monograph
Drug User Fee Program.'' This guidance provides stakeholders with
information regarding FDA's implementation of the Over-the-Counter
Monograph Drug User Fee Program. On March 27, 2020, new provisions were
added to the FD&C Act (21 U.S.C. 9) by the Coronavirus Aid, Relief, and
Economic Security Act (CARES Act) (Pub. L. 116-136). Among these new
FD&C Act provisions were sections 744L (21 U.S.C. 379j-71) and 744M (21
U.S.C. 379j-72), which authorize FDA to assess and collect user fees
from qualifying manufacturers of over-the-counter (OTC) monograph drugs
and submitters of OTC Monograph Order Requests (OMOR), other than OMORs
for certain safety changes. FDA refers to the OTC Monograph Drug User
Fee program as ``OMUFA'' throughout this document. The draft guidance
also describes the types of OMUFA fees authorized by the FD&C Act, the
due dates of the fees, and explains the exceptions to certain fees. In
addition, this guidance describes the process for submitting fee
payments to FDA, the consequences for failing to pay the required fees,
and the process for submitting refund requests or disputing FDA's
assessment of OMUFA fees. This guidance does not address how FDA
calculates OMUFA fee rates for each fiscal year, nor does it address
FDA's implementation of other user fee programs (e.g., under the
Prescription Drug User Fee Act, Biosimilar User Fee Act, or Generic
Drug User Fee Amendments).
    This draft guidance is being issued consistent with FDA's good
guidance practices regulation (21 CFR 10.115). The draft guidance, when
finalized, will represent the current thinking of FDA on ``Assessing
User Fees Under the Over-the-Counter Monograph Drug User Fee Program.''
It does not establish any rights for any person and is not binding on
FDA or the public. You can use an alternative approach if it satisfies
the requirements of the applicable statutes and regulations.

II. Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995

    While this guidance contains no collection of information, it does
refer to previously approved FDA collections of information. Therefore,
clearance by the Office of Management and Budget (OMB) under the
Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 (PRA) (44 U.S.C. 3501-3521) is not
required for this guidance. The previously approved collections of
information are subject to review by OMB under the PRA. The collections
of information in the over-the-counter drug user fee program have been
approved under OMB Control Number 0910-0340. The collection of
information associated with completing and submitting FDA 3913 (User
Fee Payment Refund Request) is approved under OMB control number 0910-
0805.

III. Electronic Access

    Persons with access to the internet may obtain the draft guidance
at https://www.fda.gov/drugs/guidance-compliance-regulatory-information/guidances-drugs, https://www.fda.gov/regulatory-information/search-fda-guidance-documents, or https://www.regulations.gov.

    Dated: October 27, 2022.
Lauren K. Roth,
Associate Commissioner for Policy.
[FR Doc. 2022-23791 Filed 11-1-22; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4164-01-P


[Federal Register Volume 83, Number 167 (Tuesday, August 28, 2018)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Pages 43765-43767]
[FR Doc No: 2018-18529]

=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY

40 CFR Part 52

[EPA-R09-OAR-2018-0282; FRL-9981-98--Region 9]

Approval of Air Plan Revisions; Approvals and Promulgations:
California; Placer County Air Pollution Control District; Stationary
Source Permits

AGENCY: Environmental Protection Agency (EPA).

ACTION: Final rule.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) is finalizing action
on a revision to the Placer County Air Pollution Control District
(PCAPCD or District) portion of the California State Implementation
Plan (SIP). This revision concerns the District's Prevention of
Significant Deterioration (PSD) permitting program for new and modified
sources of air pollution. We are finalizing action on a local rule
under the Clean Air Act as amended in 1990 (CAA or the Act).

DATES: This rule will be effective on September 27, 2018.

ADDRESSES: The EPA has established a docket for this action under
Docket No. EPA-R09-OAR-2018-0282. All documents in the docket are
listed on the http://www.regulations.gov website. Although listed in
the index, some information is not publicly available, e.g.,
Confidential Business Information or other information whose disclosure
is restricted by statute. Certain other material, such as copyrighted
material, is not placed on the internet and will be publicly available
only in hard copy form. Publicly available docket materials are
available through http://www.regulations.gov, or please contact the
person identified in the FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT section for
additional availability information.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Laura Yannayon, EPA Region IX, (415)
972-3534, [email protected].

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Throughout this document, ``we,'' ``us'' and
``our'' refer to the EPA.

Table of Contents

I. Proposed Action
II. Public Comments and EPA Responses
III. EPA Action
IV. Incorporation by Reference
V. Statutory and Executive Order Reviews

I. Proposed Action

    On June 14, 2018 (83 FR 27738), the EPA proposed to fully approve
the following rule that was submitted for incorporation into the PCAPCD
portion of the California SIP.

                                             Table 1--Submitted Rule
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
                                                                                Adopted or
             Rule No.                                Rule title                       amended        Submitted
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
518..............................  Prevention of Significant Deterioration (PSD)        10/13/16         1/24/17
                                    Permit Program.
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

    We proposed approval of this rule because we determined that the
rule met the statutory requirements for SIP revisions as specified in
section 110(l) of the CAA, as well as the substantive statutory and
regulatory requirements for a PSD permit program as contained in CAA
section 110(a)(2)(C) and 40 CFR 51.166.

II. Public Comments and EPA Responses

    The EPA's proposed action provided a 30-day public comment period.
During this period, we received two comments on the proposed rule.
These comments raised issues that are outside the scope of our proposed
approval of Rule 518, including air pollution monitoring in China and
India, climate change, and wind and solar power costs and regulations.
None of those comments are germane to our evaluation of Rule 518.
    The EPA is required to approve a state SIP submission if the
submittal meets

all of the applicable requirements of the Act. 42 U.S.C. 7410(k)(3).
None of the submitted comments indicate that the District's submittal
of Rule 518 does not meet the requirements of the Act.

III. EPA Action

    No comments were submitted that change our assessment that
submitted Rule 518 satisfies the applicable CAA requirements.
Therefore, under CAA sections 110(k)(3) and 301(a), and for the reasons
set forth in our June 14, 2018 proposed rule, we are fully approving
Rule 518. This action incorporates the submitted rule into the PCAPCD
portion of the California SIP and makes it federally enforceable. In
addition, because we are finalizing our proposed action, we are
removing the existing Rule 518 from the PCAPCD portion of the
California SIP.

IV. Incorporation by Reference

    In this rule, the EPA is finalizing regulatory text that includes
incorporation by reference. In accordance with requirements of 1 CFR
51.5, the EPA is finalizing the incorporation by reference of the
PCAPCD rule listed in Table 1 of this document. The EPA has made, and
will continue to make, these documents available through
www.regulations.gov and at the EPA Region IX Office (please contact the
person identified in the FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT section of
this preamble for more information).

V. Statutory and Executive Order Reviews

    Under the CAA, the Administrator is required to approve a SIP
submission that complies with the provisions of the Act and applicable
Federal regulations. 42 U.S.C. 7410(k); 40 CFR 52.02(a). Thus, in
reviewing SIP submissions, the EPA's role is to approve state choices,
provided that they meet the criteria of the CAA. Accordingly, this
action merely approves state law as meeting Federal requirements and
does not impose additional requirements beyond those imposed by state
law. For that reason, this action:
     Is not a significant regulatory action subject to review
by the Office of Management and Budget under Executive Orders 12866 (58
FR 51735, October 4, 1993) and 13563 (76 FR 3821, January 21, 2011);
     Is not an Executive Order 13771 (82 FR 9339, February 2,
2017) regulatory action because SIP approvals are exempted under
Executive Order 12866;
     Does not impose an information collection burden under the
provisions of the Paperwork Reduction Act (44 U.S.C. 3501 et seq.);
     Is certified as not having a significant economic impact
on a substantial number of small entities under the Regulatory
Flexibility Act (5 U.S.C. 601 et seq.);
     Does not contain any unfunded mandate or significantly or
uniquely affect small governments, as described in the Unfunded
Mandates Reform Act of 1995 (Pub. L. 104-4);
     Does not have Federalism implications as specified in
Executive Order 13132 (64 FR 43255, August 10, 1999);
     Is not an economically significant regulatory action based
on health or safety risks subject to Executive Order 13045 (62 FR
19885, April 23, 1997);
     Is not a significant regulatory action subject to
Executive Order 13211 (66 FR 28355, May 22, 2001);
     Is not subject to requirements of Section 12(d) of the
National Technology Transfer and Advancement Act of 1995 (15 U.S.C. 272
note) because application of those requirements would be inconsistent
with the Clean Air Act; and
     Does not provide the EPA with the discretionary authority
to address, as appropriate, disproportionate human health or
environmental effects, using practicable and legally permissible
methods, under Executive Order 12898 (59 FR 7629, February 16, 1994).
    In addition, the SIP is not approved to apply on any Indian
reservation land or in any other area where the EPA or an Indian tribe
has demonstrated that a tribe has jurisdiction. In those areas of
Indian country, the rule does not have tribal implications and will not
impose substantial direct costs on tribal governments or preempt tribal
law as specified by Executive Order 13175 (65 FR 67249, November 9,
2000).
    The Congressional Review Act, 5 U.S.C. 801 et seq., as added by the
Small Business Regulatory Enforcement Fairness Act of 1996, generally
provides that before a rule may take effect, the agency promulgating
the rule must submit a rule report, which includes a copy of the rule,
to each House of the Congress and to the Comptroller General of the
United States. The EPA will submit a report containing this action and
other required information to the U.S. Senate, the U.S. House of
Representatives, and the Comptroller General of the United States prior
to publication of the rule in the Federal Register. A major rule cannot
take effect until 60 days after it is published in the Federal
Register. This action is not a ``major rule'' as defined by 5 U.S.C.
804(2).

List of Subjects in 40 CFR Part 52

    Environmental protection, Air pollution control, Incorporation by
reference, Intergovernmental relations, New source review, Ozone,
Particulate matter, Reporting and recordkeeping requirements, Volatile
organic compounds.

    Dated: July 27, 2018.
Deborah Jordan,
Acting Regional Administrator, Region IX.

    Part 52, chapter I, title 40 of the Code of Federal Regulations is
amended as follows:

PART 52--APPROVAL AND PROMULGATION OF IMPLEMENTATION PLANS

0
1. The authority citation for part 52 continues to read as follows:

    Authority:  42 U.S.C. 7401 et seq.

Subpart F--California

0
2. Section 52.220 is amended by adding paragraphs (c)(391)(i)(C)(2) and
(c)(497)(i)(B)(2) to read as follows:

Sec.  52.220  Identification of plan--in part.

* * * * *
    (c) * * *
    (391) * * *
    (i) * * *
    (C) * * *
    (2) Previously approved on December 10, 2012 in paragraph
(c)(391)(i)(C)(1) of this section and now deleted with replacement in
paragraph (c)(497)(i)(B)(2) of this section, Rule 518, ``Prevention of
Significant Deterioration (PSD) Permit Program.''
* * * * *
    (497) * * *
    (i) * * *
    (B) * * *
    (2) Rule 518, ``Prevention of Significant Deterioration (PSD)
Permit Program,'' amended on October 13, 2016.
* * * * *

0
3. Section 52.270 is amended by revising paragraph (b)(6) to read as
follows:

Sec.  52.270  Significant deterioration of air quality.

* * * * *
    (b) * * *
    (6) The PSD program for the Placer County Air Pollution Control
District (PCAPCD), as incorporated by reference in Sec.
52.220(c)(497)(i)(B)(2), is approved under part C, subpart 1, of the
Clean Air Act. For PSD permits previously issued by EPA pursuant to
Sec.  52.21 to sources located in the PCAPCD, this approval includes
the authority for the PCAPCD

to conduct general administration of these existing permits, authority
to process and issue any and all subsequent permit actions relating to
such permits, and authority to enforce such permits.
* * * * *

[FR Doc. 2018-18529 Filed 8-27-18; 8:45 am]
 BILLING CODE 6560-50-P


[Federal Register: October 26, 2005 (Volume 70, Number 206)]
[Notices]
[Page 61797-61798]
[DOCID:fr26oc05-58]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission

[Docket No. ER05-1444-001]

Midwest Independent Transmission System Operator, Inc.; Notice of
Filing

October 19, 2005.

    Take notice that on September 13, 2005, the Midwest Independent
Transmission System Operator, Inc. (Midwest ISO) submitted an errata to
its September 6, 2005 filing of an unexecuted Large Generator
Interconnection Agreement among

Matton Wind Farm LLC, the Midwest ISO, and Central Illinois Public
Service Company d/b/a/ Ameren CIPS.
    Any person desiring to intervene or to protest this filing must
file in accordance with Rules 211 and 214 of the Commission's Rules of
Practice and Procedure (18 CFR 385.211, 385.214). Protests will be
considered by the Commission in determining the appropriate action to
be taken, but will not serve to make protestants parties to the
proceeding. Any person wishing to become a party must file a notice of
intervention or motion to intervene, as appropriate. Such notices,
motions, or protests must be filed on or before the comment date.
Anyone filing a motion to intervene or protest must serve a copy of
that document on the Applicant and all the parties in this proceeding.
    The Commission encourages electronic submission of protests and
interventions in lieu of paper using the ``eFiling'' link at http://www.ferc.gov.
 Persons unable to file electronically should submit an

original and 14 copies of the protest or intervention to the Federal
Energy Regulatory Commission, 888 First Street, NE., Washington, DC
20426.
    This filing is accessible on-line at http://www.ferc.gov, using the

``eLibrary'' link and is available for review in the Commission's
Public Reference Room in Washington, DC. There is an ``eSubscription''
link on the Web site that enables subscribers to receive email
notification when a document is added to a subscribed docket(s). For
assistance with any FERC Online service, please e-mail
<EMAIL_ADDRESS>or call<PHONE_NUMBER> (toll free). For

TTY, call<PHONE_NUMBER>.
    Comment Date: 5 p.m. Eastern Time on October 28, 2005.

Magalie R. Salas,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. E5-5903 Filed 10-25-05; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 6717-01-P


                       PPDC AZM Transition Issues Workgroup Members

                                                                mEMBERS & aFFILIATIONS

AGRICULTURE/FARMER REPRESENTATIVES

Lori Berger, CA Specialty Crops Council

Bob McClain, CA Pear Advisory Board

Mike Willett, NW Horticultural Council

[Roberta] Robin Spitko, New England Fruit Consultants

Jeff Zellers, Ohio Parsley Producer

Ann Pingitore, Schramm, Williams & Assoc [for CA Pistachio Commission]

Phil Korson, Cherry Marketing Institute (Lansing, MI)

Jim Cranney, US Apple Association

Dave Trinka, MBG Marketing (blueberries)

Gabriele Ludwig, Almond Board of CA

Rebeckah Freeman Adcock, American Farm Bureau Federation

ENVIRONMENTAL/CONSUMER/FARMWORKER REPRESENTATIVES

Shelley Davis, Farmworker Justice Fund, Inc.

Daniel Sonke, Protected Harvest

Carol Dansereau, Farm Worker Pesticide Project

Michael Fry, American Bird Conservancy

ACADEMIA/PUBLIC HEALTH/PUBLIC FOUNDATION REPRESENTATIVES

Larry Elworth, Center for Agricultural Partnerships

Mark Whalon, MI State University

Rufus Isaacs, MI State University

Jay Brunner, WA State University

Jerry Baron, IR-4

Larry Olsen, North Central Regional IPM Center

PESTICIDE COMPANIES/TRADE ASSOCIATION REPRESENTATIVES

Janis McFarland, Syngenta

Paula Paul, DuPont Crop Protection

Mike Shaw, Dow AgroSciences

Ephi Gur, MANA Crop Protection [or Scott Rawlins]

Larry Hodges, Bayer CropScience

TRIBAL/STATE/LOCAL GOVERNMENT REPRESENTATIVES

Bob Elliott, California Department of Pesticide Regulation

FOOD PROCESSOR/DISTRIBUTOR REPRESENTATIVES

Steve Balling, Del Monte Foods

 OBSERVERS

Canada’s PMRA

[our PMRA contact: Kit Nelson]

Hang Tang, Section Head,

Re-evaluation Coordination Section II, Reevaluation Management Division

Andrew Beyak, Senior Evaluation Officer, Re-evaluation Coordination Section, Re-evaluation Management Division

Stephen Goodacre, Evaluation Officer, Re-evaluation and Use Analysis Section, Efficacy and Sustainability Assessment Division

USDA Workgroup Members

Allen Jennings, PPDC AZM Transition Issues Workgroup Co-Chair

Diane Gelburd, NCRS

Mike Fitzner, CSREES

EPA Workgroup Members

Rick Keigwin, PPDC AZM Transition Issues Workgroup Co-Chair

Pat Cimino, BEAD

Margaret Rice, SRRD

Meredith Laws, RD

Steve Morrill, BPPD

Barbara VanTil, EPA Region 5 Pesticides Program Section

EPA Workgroup Participants

Lois Rossi, Director, RD

Steve Smearman, BEAD

Colwell Cook, BEAD

Steve Jarboe, BEAD

Tom Myers, SRRD

Katie Hall, SRRD

Tom Brennan, BPPD

Linda (“Pineapple”) Murray, BEAD [AZM Workgroup DFO]


[Federal Register Volume 84, Number 163 (Thursday, August 22, 2019)]
[Notices]
[Pages 43806-43807]
[FR Doc No: 2019-18087]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY

[EPA-HQ-OAR-2018-0279; FRL-9998-51-OAR]

Release of Integrated Review Plan for the Ozone National Ambient
Air Quality Standards

AGENCY: Environmental Protection Agency (EPA).

ACTION: Notice of availability.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: On or about August 26, 2019, the Environmental Protection
Agency (EPA) will make available the final document, Integrated Review
Plan for the Ozone National Ambient Air Quality Standards (IRP). This
document contains plans for the current review of the air quality
criteria and national ambient air quality standards (NAAQS) for
photochemical oxidants including ozone (O3). The primary and
secondary O3 NAAQS are set to protect the public health and
the public welfare from O3 and other photochemical oxidants
in ambient air.

ADDRESSES: This document will be available on the EPA's website at
https://www.epa.gov/naaqs/ozone-o3-air-quality-standards. The document
will be accessible under ``Planning Documents'' from the current
review.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Dr. Deirdre L. Murphy, Office of Air
Quality Planning and Standards, (Mail Code C504-06), U.S. Environmental
Protection Agency, Research Triangle Park, NC 27711; telephone number:
(919) 541-0729, fax number:<PHONE_NUMBER>; or email:
<EMAIL_ADDRESS>
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

I. General Information

A. How can I get copies of this document and related information?

    1. Docket. EPA has established a docket for this action under
Docket ID No. EPA-HQ-OAR-2018-0279. A separate docket established for
the Integrated Science Assessment being prepared for this action (EPA-
HQ-ORD-2018-0274) is also incorporated into the rulemaking docket for
this review. Publicly available docket materials are available
electronically through www.regulations.gov or may be viewed at the Air
and Radiation Docket and Information Center, EPA/DC, EPA West, Room
3334, 1301 Constitution Ave. NW, Washington, DC. The Public Reading
Room is open from 8:30 a.m. to 4:30 p.m., Monday through Friday,
excluding legal holidays. The telephone number for the Public Reading
Room is<PHONE_NUMBER>, and the telephone number for the Air and
Radiation Docket and Information Center is<PHONE_NUMBER>.
    2. The document announced today and related information will be
available via the internet on the EPA's website at https://www.epa.gov/naaqs/ozone-o3-air-quality-standards. The document announced today will
be accessible under ``Planning Documents'' from the current review.

II. Information Specific to This Document

    Two sections of the Clean Air Act (CAA or the Act) govern the
establishment and revision of the NAAQS. Section 108 directs the
Administrator to identify and list certain air pollutants and then
issue ``air quality criteria'' for those pollutants. The air quality
criteria are to ``accurately reflect the latest scientific knowledge
useful in indicating the kind and extent of all identifiable effects on
public health or welfare which may be expected from the presence of
such pollutant in the ambient air. . .'' (CAA

section 108(a)(2)). Under section 109 of the Act, the EPA is then to
establish primary (health-based) and secondary (welfare-based) NAAQS
for each pollutant for which the EPA has issued air quality criteria.
Section 109(d)(1) of the Act requires periodic review and, if
appropriate, revision of existing air quality criteria. Revised air
quality criteria are to reflect advances in scientific knowledge on the
effects of the pollutant on public health and welfare. Under the same
provision, the EPA is also to periodically review and, if appropriate,
revise the NAAQS, based on the revised air quality criteria.
    The Act additionally requires appointment of an independent
scientific review committee that is to periodically review the existing
air quality criteria and NAAQS and to recommend any new standards and
revisions of existing criteria and standards as may be appropriate (CAA
section 109(d)(2)(A)-(B)). Since the early 1980s, the requirement for
an independent scientific review committee has been fulfilled by the
Clean Air Scientific Advisory Committee (CASAC).
    Presently the EPA is reviewing the air quality criteria and NAAQS
for photochemical oxidants and O3.\1\ The document announced
in this notice has been developed as part of the planning phase for the
review. In this phase, a draft IRP was prepared jointly by the EPA's
National Center for Environmental Assessment, within the Office of
Research and Development, and the Office of Air Quality Planning and
Standards, within the Office of Air and Radiation. The draft IRP was
the subject of a consultation with CASAC on November 29, 2018 and was
available for public comment (83 FR 55163, November 2, 2018; 83 FR
55528, November 6, 2018). The document announced today has been
prepared after consideration of CASAC and public comments. This IRP
presents EPA's current plans for the schedule for the entire review,
the process for conducting the review, and the key policy-relevant
science issues that will guide the review. This document does not
represent and should not be construed to represent any final EPA
policy, viewpoint, or determination.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \1\ The EPA's call for information for this review was issued on
June 26, 2018 (83 FR 29785).

    Dated: August 16, 2019.
Panagiotis Tsirigotis,
Director, Office of Air Quality Planning and Standards.
[FR Doc. 2019-18087 Filed 8-21-19; 8:45 am]
 BILLING CODE 6560-50-P


Meeting Notes

OSW and The Fertilizer Institute

October 2, 2007

On October 2, 2007, OSW met with The Fertilizer Institute to discuss
EPA’s Supplemental Proposal on the Definition of Solid Waste. In
attendance:

Matt Hale		EPA OSW

Betsy Devlin		EPA OSW

Charlotte Mooney	EPA OSW

Marybeth Sheridan	EPA OSW

Leslie Oif		EPA OECA

Deborah Wire		Department of Justice

Chris Leeson		Gallagher and Kennedy

William Herz		The Fertilizer Institute

EPA and The Fertilizer Institute (TFI) discussed some of the issues
raised in TFI’s comments on the Supplemental Proposal, including
whether use constituting disposal should be included in the proposed
exclusions, the non-waste determination process (and UCD), interaction
of the supplemental proposal with the Bevill exclusion, and the use of
ammonia hydroxide in fertilizer. TFI stated that they feel this proposal
is an improvement over the 2003 proposal and OSW discussed the planned
schedule for the final rulemaking.


[Federal Register: September 13, 2010 (Volume 75, Number 176)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Page 55455-55459]
[DOCID:fr13se10-2]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION

Federal Aviation Administration

14 CFR Part 39

[Docket No. FAA-2010-0037; Directorate Identifier 2009-NM-240-AD;
Amendment 39-16431; AD 2010-19-03]
RIN 2120-AA64

Airworthiness Directives; The Boeing Company Model 737-700 (IGW)
Series Airplanes Equipped With Auxiliary Fuel Tanks Installed in
Accordance With Configuration 3 of Supplemental Type Certificate
ST00936NY

AGENCY: Federal Aviation Administration (FAA), DOT.

ACTION: Final rule.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: We are adopting a new airworthiness directive (AD) for certain
Model 737-700 (IGW) series airplanes. This AD requires deactivation or
modification of PATS Aircraft, LLC, auxiliary fuel tanks. This AD
results from fuel system reviews conducted by the manufacturer. We are
issuing this AD to prevent the potential of ignition sources inside
fuel tanks, which, in combination with flammable fuel vapors, could
result in fuel tank explosions and consequent loss of the airplane.

DATES: This AD is effective October 18, 2010.
    The Director of the Federal Register approved the incorporation by
reference of certain publications listed in the AD as of October 18,
2010.

ADDRESSES: For service information identified in this AD, contact
DeCrane Aerospace, PATS Aircraft Systems, 21652 Nanticoke Avenue,
Georgetown, Delaware 19947; telephone<PHONE_NUMBER>; fax<PHONE_NUMBER>;
e-mail giuseppecoppola@ decraneaerospace.com; Internet http://
www.decraneaerospace.com.

Examining the AD Docket

    You may examine the AD docket on the Internet at http://
www.regulations.gov; or in person at the Docket Management Facility
between 9 a.m. and 5 p.m., Monday through Friday, except Federal
holidays. The AD docket contains this AD, the regulatory evaluation,
any comments received, and other information. The address for the
Docket Office (telephone<PHONE_NUMBER>) is the Document Management
Facility, U.S. Department of Transportation, Docket Operations, M-30,
West Building Ground Floor, Room W12-140, 1200 New Jersey Avenue, SE.,
Washington, DC 20590.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Mazdak Hobbi, Aerospace Engineer,
Propulsion and Services Branch, ANE-173, FAA, New York Aircraft
Certification Office, 1600 Stewart Avenue, Suite 410, Westbury, New
York 11590; telephone<PHONE_NUMBER>; fax<PHONE_NUMBER>.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

Discussion

    We issued a notice of proposed rulemaking (NPRM) to amend 14 CFR
part 39 to include an airworthiness directive (AD) that would apply to
certain Model 737-700 (IGW) series airplanes. That NPRM was published
in the Federal Register on February 12, 2010 (75 FR 6865). That NPRM
proposed to require deactivation or modification of PATS Aircraft, LLC,
auxiliary fuel tanks.

Comments

    We gave the public the opportunity to participate in developing
this AD. We considered the comments received.

Request To Clarify Configuration 3 Airplanes Affected

    Global Jet asks what has changed regarding Configuration 3
airplanes affected by the actions in the NPRM. Global Jet states that
it received an email from the FAA in May 2008, which specified that no
further action was required for its Configuration 3 airplanes. Global
Jet asks why it was in compliance with SFAR 88 last year and is not in
compliance this year, although the airplane configuration has not
changed in any way. PATS recommends clarifying that although
Configuration 3 airplanes were excluded from AD 2008-22-01, those
airplanes are not in compliance with the SFAR 88 regulations.
    We acknowledge the commenters' concerns and provide the following
clarification. We have received new information from a secondary review
of Configuration 3 airplanes and have determined that they are not
compliant with the SFAR 88 regulations. Therefore, those airplanes are
included in the applicability of this AD. We have made no change to the
AD in this regard.

Request To Refer to AD 2008-22-01

    PATS Aircraft, LLC (PATS), asks that we include a reference to the
requirements of AD 2008-22-01, amendment 39-15696 (73 FR 62872, October
22, 2008), in the NPRM. PATS states that the information specified in
the NPRM corrects an error in AD 2008-22-01, which incorrectly
identifies Configuration 3 airplanes as being

compliant with Special Federal Aviation Regulation No. 88 (SFAR 88)
requirements. PATS notes that this is incorrect since Configuration 3
airplanes require incorporation of DeCrane Aerospace 737-700 IGW
Service Bulletins ST00936NY-D-28-SB-001--K, dated August 25, 2008; and
ST00936NY-D-28-SB-021--K, dated January 8, 2009. PATS adds that an
alternative method of compliance (AMOC) was issued for AD 2008-22-01 to
approve the service bulletins for Configuration 3 airplanes.
    We acknowledge the commenter's concern and provide the following.
The NPRM was issued, in part, to correct the error in AD 2008-22-01.
That AD applies to various transport category airplanes equipped with
auxiliary fuel tanks installed in accordance with certain supplemental
type certificates, and requires deactivation of PATS Aircraft, LLC,
auxiliary fuel tanks. AD 2008-22-01 does not require the modification
specified in the subject service information; therefore, since
Configuration 3 airplanes are included in the applicability of this AD,
it is not necessary to reference the requirements of AD 2008-22-01. We
have not changed the AD in this regard.

Request To Include Previously Issued Service Information

    PATS recommends including the DeCrane/PATS service bulletins
specified in Table 1 of this AD as acceptable sources of service
information for accomplishing the actions specified in the NPRM. PATS
states that the FAA issued an AMOC for AD 2008-22-01 approving this
service information for accomplishing the actions on Model 737-700
(IGW) airplanes with STC ST00936NY-D, Configuration 3.
    We agree with the commenter for the reasons provided. We have added
a new paragraph (h) to this AD to give credit for using previous issues
of the DeCrane/PATS service information to accomplish the specified
actions.

Request To Change the Description of the Auxiliary Fuel Tanks

    PATS points out that the description of the PATS auxiliary fuel
tank is incorrect in the section of the NPRM titled ``Supplemental Type
Certificates (STCs) for PATS Aircraft, LLC, Auxiliary Fuel Tanks.''
PATS states that it has never designed or certified a ``box-and-
bladder-type'' auxiliary fuel tank, and provides the following
description of the PATS auxiliary fuel tank system.

    PATS' typical auxiliary fuel system (AFS) consists of several
interconnected auxiliary fuel cells located in the aircraft's cargo
holds. The cells are constructed of aluminum alloy with double walls
and mounted on longitudinal rails attached to the aircraft's frame.
The inner walls serve as the fuel storage cell, and the outer walls
serve as the fuel and fume-proof shroud around the cell. The two
walls are separated by an open-weave honeycomb structure bonded to
the walls. The cells resemble aircraft cargo containers. The
individual cells are usually arranged in two groups within the
forward and aft lower cargo holds. These forward and aft fuel cell
groups operate independently as two separate tanks.

    We infer that the commenter requests we revise the description of
the STC. We agree that the description in the NPRM requires further
clarification. However, that section of the preamble of the NPRM does
not reappear in the final rule; therefore, no change to the final rule
has been made. However, we have provided the above clarification to the
section of the NPRM titled ``Supplemental Type Certificates (STCs) for
PATS Aircraft, LLC, Auxiliary Fuel Tanks'' as suggested by PATS.

Requests To Extend Compliance Time

    Boeing, Global Jet (Global Jet) Luxembourg, and Qantas Airways
(Qantas) ask that the compliance time of 45 days for accomplishing the
actions specified in the NPRM be extended. Boeing and Global Jet state
that the impact of the proposed compliance time would be
disproportionate to the risk, and add that there is insufficient
capacity in the available overhaul facilities to accomplish the
retrofit within 45 days after the effective date of the AD. Boeing
notes that there are similar risks in other ADs and recommends using
risk-analysis to determine a compliance time. Qantas states that we
should permit a longer compliance time for airplanes modified in
accordance with Revision G (or later) of DeCrane Aerospace 737-700 IGW
Service Bulletin ST00936NY-D-28-SB-001, or ST00936NY-D-28-SB-021.
Qantas suggests the compliance time be extended to 12 months after the
effective date of the AD to allow accomplishing the actions during
regularly scheduled maintenance.
    We agree with the commenters. We have extended the compliance time
specified in paragraph (g) of this AD to 6 months after the effective
date of the AD to coincide with the extension given in AMOCs for AD
2008-22-01. We find that extending the compliance time to 6 months will
not adversely affect safety, and will allow the modification to be
performed during regularly scheduled maintenance at a base where
special equipment and trained maintenance personnel will be available
if necessary.

Request To Clarify Levels of Configuration

    PATS asks that we clarify the configuration levels on Configuration
3 airplanes and recommends the section of the NPRM titled
``Supplemental Type Certificates (STCs) for PATS Aircraft, LLC,
Auxiliary Fuel Tanks'' be changed to include those levels.
    We provide the following clarification. Configuration 3 airplanes
include 3-A, 3-B, 3-C, 3-D, 3-E, 3-F, 3-G, 3-H, 3-J, 3-K, 3-M, 3-N, 3-
P, 3-R, 3-S, 3-T, 3-U, 3-V, and 3-W, as listed on STC ST00936NY-D.
However, since the section of the NPRM referenced by the commenter does
not reappear in the final rule, no change to this AD is necessary in
this regard.

Request To Increase Cost Estimate in Costs of Compliance Section of
This AD

    Boeing asks that we change the Costs of Compliance section of the
NPRM. Boeing states that the economic impact specified in the NPRM
fails to account for the total economic costs of compliance. Boeing
estimates the costs to be approximately $300,000 for service bulletin
parts kits and $120,000 in labor (estimated 1,600 work hours of labor
at $75/hour), plus other unplanned costs for air transportation while
these airplanes are out of service for the modification. Boeing adds
that the cost per airplane would exceed $400,000 even in the most
optimistic and efficient modification scenarios.
    We agree that the number of work hours required for the
modification is higher than our estimate. The estimate in the NPRM only
included the costs for deactivation of the auxiliary fuel tanks.
Therefore, the cost impact information, below, has been revised to
include the cost for accomplishing the modification. The economic
analysis, however, is limited only to the cost of actions actually
required by the rule. It does not consider the costs of ``on-
condition'' actions (e.g., ``repair, if necessary'') because,
regardless of AD direction, those actions would be required to correct
an unsafe condition identified in an airplane and ensure operation of
that airplane in an airworthy condition, as required by the Federal
Aviation Regulations. We have made no further change to this final rule
regarding this issue.

Explanation of Change to AD

    We have changed paragraph (g)(1) of this AD to clarify the
terminology regarding approval of the deactivation procedures.

Conclusion

    We reviewed the relevant data, considered the comments received,
and determined that air safety and the public interest require adopting
the AD with the changes described previously. We also determined that
these changes will not increase the economic burden on any operator or
increase the scope of the AD.

Costs of Compliance

    We estimate that this AD affects 11 airplanes of U.S. registry.
    We estimate that it will take about 250 work-hours per product to
comply with the deactivation of the auxiliary fuel tanks. The average
labor rate is $85 per work-hour. Required parts will cost about $10,000
per product. Based on these figures, we estimate the cost of the
deactivation to the U.S. operators to be $343,750, or $31,250 per
product.
    We estimate that it will take between 90 and 650 work-hours per
product, depending on airplane configuration, to comply with the
modification of the auxiliary fuel system. The average labor rate is
$85 per work-hour. Required parts will cost between $182,505 and
$228,131 per product. Based on these figures, we estimate the cost of
the modification to U.S. operators to be between $2,091,705 and
$3,117,191, or between $190,155 and $283,381 per product.

Authority for This Rulemaking

    Title 49 of the United States Code specifies the FAA's authority to
issue rules on aviation safety. Subtitle I, section 106, describes the
authority of the FAA Administrator. ``Subtitle VII: Aviation
Programs,'' describes in more detail the scope of the Agency's
authority.
    We are issuing this rulemaking under the authority described in
``Subtitle VII, Part A, Subpart III, Section 44701: General
requirements.'' Under that section, Congress charges the FAA with
promoting safe flight of civil aircraft in air commerce by prescribing
regulations for practices, methods, and procedures the Administrator
finds necessary for safety in air commerce. This regulation is within
the scope of that authority because it addresses an unsafe condition
that is likely to exist or develop on products identified in this
rulemaking action.

Regulatory Findings

    This AD will not have federalism implications under Executive Order
13132. This AD will not have a substantial direct effect on the States,
on the relationship between the national government and the States, or
on the distribution of power and responsibilities among the various
levels of government.
    For the reasons discussed above, I certify that this AD:
    (1) Is not a ``significant regulatory action'' under Executive
Order 12866,
    (2) Is not a ``significant rule'' under DOT Regulatory Policies and
Procedures (44 FR 11034, February 26, 1979), and
    (3) Will not have a significant economic impact, positive or
negative, on a substantial number of small entities under the criteria
of the Regulatory Flexibility Act.
    You can find our regulatory evaluation and the estimated costs of
compliance in the AD Docket.

List of Subjects in 14 CFR Part 39

    Air transportation, Aircraft, Aviation safety, Incorporation by
reference, Safety.

Adoption of the Amendment

0
Accordingly, under the authority delegated to me by the Administrator,
the FAA amends 14 CFR part 39 as follows:

PART 39--AIRWORTHINESS DIRECTIVES

0
1. The authority citation for part 39 continues to read as follows:

    Authority:  49 U.S.C. 106(g), 40113, 44701.

Sec.  39.13  [Amended]

0
2. The FAA amends Sec.  39.13 by adding the following new AD:

2010-19-03 The Boeing Company: Amendment 39-16431. Docket No. FAA-
2010-0037; Directorate Identifier 2009-NM-240-AD.

Effective Date

    (a) This airworthiness directive (AD) is effective October 18,
2010.

Affected ADs

    (b) None.

Applicability

    (c) This AD applies to The Boeing Company Model 737-700 (IGW)
series airplanes, certificated in any category; equipped with
auxiliary fuel tanks installed in accordance with Configuration 3 of
Supplemental Type Certificate ST00936NY.

Subject

    (d) Air Transport Association (ATA) of America Code 28: Fuel.

Unsafe Condition

    (e) This AD results from fuel system reviews conducted by the
manufacturer. The Federal Aviation Administration is issuing this AD
to prevent the potential of ignition sources inside fuel tanks,
which, in combination with flammable fuel vapors, could result in
fuel tank explosions and consequent loss of the airplane.

Compliance

    (f) You are responsible for having the actions required by this
AD performed within the compliance times specified, unless the
actions have already been done.

Prevent Usage of Auxiliary Fuel Tanks or Modify Auxiliary Fuel System

    (g) Within 6 months after the effective date of this AD:
Accomplish the requirements specified in paragraph (g)(1) or (g)(2)
of this AD.
    (1) Deactivate the auxiliary fuel tanks, in accordance with a
deactivation procedure approved by the Manager, New York Aircraft
Certification Office (ACO). For any deactivation procedure to be
approved, it must be shown that following deactivation, any
auxiliary tank component that remains on the airplane must be
secured and must be shown to meet the certification basis of the
airplane. Deactivation must not result in the need for additional
instructions for continued airworthiness.

    Note 1:  Appendix A of this AD provides criteria that should be
included in the deactivation procedures. The proposed deactivation
procedures should be submitted to the Manager, New York ACO, as soon
as possible to ensure timely review and approval.

    Note 2:  For technical information, contact Mazdak Hobbi,
Aerospace Engineer, Propulsion and Services Branch, ANE-173, FAA,
New York ACO, 1600 Stewart Avenue, Suite 410, Westbury, New York
11590; telephone<PHONE_NUMBER>; fax<PHONE_NUMBER>.

    (2) Modify the auxiliary fuel system by doing all the applicable
actions in accordance with the Accomplishment Instructions of
DeCrane Aerospace 737-700 IGW Service Bulletin ST00936NY-D-28-SB-
001--K, dated August 25, 2008; and DeCrane Aerospace 737-700 IGW
Service Bulletin ST00936NY-D-28-SB-021--K, dated January 8, 2009.

Credit for Actions Accomplished in Accordance With Previous Service
Information

    (h) Actions accomplished before the effective date of this AD
according to the service information identified in Table 1 of this
AD, are considered acceptable for compliance with the corresponding
actions specified in paragraph (g)(2) of this AD.

                                       Table 1--Credit Service Information
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
             Service Bulletin                        Revision                             Date
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
DeCrane Aerospace 737-700 IGW ST00936NY-D- G..........................  March 27, 2008.
 28-SB-001--G.
DeCrane Aerospace 737-700 IGW ST00936NY-D- H..........................  May 16, 2008.
 28-SB-001--H.
DeCrane Aerospace 737-700 IGW ST00936NY-D- J..........................  July 24, 2008.
 28-SB-001--J.
DeCrane Aerospace 737-700 IGW ST00936NY-D- D..........................  October 31, 2007.
 28-SB-021--D.
DeCrane Aerospace 737-700 IGW ST00936NY-D- E..........................  December 7, 2007.
 28-SB-021--E.
DeCrane Aerospace 737-700 IGW ST00936NY-D- F..........................  February 7, 2008.
 28-SB-021--F.
DeCrane Aerospace 737-700 IGW ST00936NY-D- G..........................  March 14, 2008.
 28-SB-021--G.
DeCrane Aerospace 737-700 IGW ST00936NY-D- H..........................  July 24, 2008.
 28-SB-021--H.
DeCrane Aerospace 737-700 IGW ST00936NY-D- J..........................  August 25, 2008.
 28-SB-021--J.
DeCrane Aircraft 737-700IGW ST00936NY-28-  Initial Release............  September 3, 2004.
 SB-001--IR.
DeCrane Aircraft 737-700 IGW ST00936NY-28- A..........................  September 15, 2004.
 SB-001--A.
DeCrane Aircraft 737-700 IGW ST00936NY-28- B..........................  October 26, 2004.
 SB-001--B.
DeCrane Aircraft 737-700 IGW ST00936NY-28- C..........................  November 4, 2004.
 SB-001--C.
PATS Aircraft 737-700 IGW ST00936NY-D-28-  D..........................  August 8, 2007.
 SB-001--D.
PATS Aircraft 737-700 IGW ST00936NY-D-28-  E..........................  January 8, 2008.
 SB-001--E.
PATS Aircraft 737-700 IGW ST00936NY-D-28-  F..........................  February 5, 2008.
 SB-001--F.
PATS Aircraft 737-700 IGW ST00936NY-D-28-  Initial Release............  January 31, 2007.
 SB-021--IR.
PATS Aircraft 737-700 IGW ST00936NY-D-28-  A..........................  May 17, 2007.
 SB-021--A.
PATS Aircraft 737-700 IGW ST00936NY-D-28-  B..........................  July 3, 2007.
 SB-021--B.
PATS Aircraft 737-700 IGW ST00936NY-D-28-  C..........................  August 8, 2007.
 SB-021--C.
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Reporting Requirement

    (i) Within 45 days after the effective date of this AD, submit a
report to the Manager, New York ACO. The report must include the
information listed in paragraphs (i)(1), (i)(2), and (i)(3) of this
AD. Under the provisions of the Paperwork Reduction Act (44 U.S.C.
3501 et seq.), the Office of Management and Budget (OMB) has
approved the information collection requirements contained in this
AD, and assigned OMB Control Number 2120-0056.
    (1) The airplane registration and operation status.
    (2) The usage frequency in terms of total number of flights per
year and total number of flights per year for which the auxiliary
tank is used.
    (3) Method of complying with paragraph (g)(1) of this AD.

Alternative Methods of Compliance (AMOCs)

    (j)(1) The Manager, New York ACO, ANE-170, FAA, has the
authority to approve AMOCs for this AD, if requested using the
procedures found in 14 CFR 39.19. Send information to ATTN: Program
Manager, Continuing Operational Safety, FAA, New York ACO, 1600
Stewart Avenue, Suite 410, Westbury, New York 11590; telephone 516-
228-7300; fax<PHONE_NUMBER>. Before using any approved AMOC on any
airplane to which the AMOC applies, notify your principal
maintenance inspector (PMI) or principal avionics inspector (PAI),
as appropriate, or lacking a principal inspector, your local Flight
Standards District Office.
    (2) To request a different method of compliance or a different
compliance time for this AD, follow the procedures in 14 CFR 39.19.
Before using any approved AMOC on any airplane to which the AMOC
applies, notify your principal maintenance inspector (PMI) or
principal avionics inspector (PAI), as appropriate, or lacking a
principal inspector, your local Flight Standards District Office.
The AMOC approval letter must specifically reference this AD.

Material Incorporated by Reference

    (k) You must use DeCrane Aerospace 737-700 IGW Service Bulletin
ST00936NY-D-28-SB-001--K, dated August 25, 2008; and DeCrane
Aerospace 737-700 IGW Service Bulletin ST00936NY-D-28-SB-021--K,
dated January 8, 2009; as applicable; to do the actions required by
this AD, unless the AD specifies otherwise.
    (1) The Director of the Federal Register approved the
incorporation by reference of this service information under 5
U.S.C. 552(a) and 1 CFR part 51.
    (2) For service information identified in this AD, contact
DeCrane Aerospace, PATS Aircraft Systems, 21652 Nanticoke Avenue,
Georgetown, Delaware 19947; telephone<PHONE_NUMBER>; fax 302-855-
0153; e-mail<EMAIL_ADDRESS>Internet http://
www.decraneaerospace.com.
    (3) You may review copies of the service information at the FAA,
Transport Airplane Directorate, 1601 Lind Avenue, SW., Renton,
Washington. For information on the availability of this material at
the FAA, call<PHONE_NUMBER>.
    (4) You may also review copies of the service information that
is incorporated by reference at the National Archives and Records
Administration (NARA). For information on the availability of this
material at NARA, call<PHONE_NUMBER>, or go to: http://
www.archives.gov/federal_register/code_of_federal_regulations/
ibr_locations.html.

Appendix A

Deactivation Criteria

    The auxiliary fuel tank deactivation procedures required by
paragraph (g)(1) of this AD should address the following actions.
    (1) Permanently drain auxiliary fuel tanks, and clear them of
fuel vapors to eliminate the possibility of out-gassing of fuel
vapors from the emptied auxiliary tank.
    (2) Disconnect all electrical connections from the fuel quantity
indication system (FQIS), fuel pumps if applicable, float switches,
and all other electrical connections required for auxiliary tank
operation, and stow them at the auxiliary tank interface.
    (3) Disconnect all pneumatic connections if applicable, cap them
at the pneumatic source, and secure them.
    (4) Disconnect all fuel feed and fuel vent plumbing interfaces
with airplane original equipment manufacturer (OEM) tanks, cap them
at the airplane tank side, and secure them in accordance with a
method approved by the FAA; one approved method is specified in AC
25-8 Auxiliary Fuel System Installations. In order to eliminate the
possibility of structural deformation during cabin decompression,
leave open and secure the disconnected auxiliary fuel tank vent
lines.
    (5) Pull and collar all circuit breakers used to operate the
auxiliary tank.
    (6) Revise the weight and balance document, if required, and
obtain FAA approval.
    (7) Amend the applicable sections of the applicable airplane
flight manual (AFM) to indicate that the auxiliary fuel tank is
deactivated. Remove auxiliary fuel tank operating procedures to
ensure that only the OEM fuel system operational procedures are
contained in the AFM. Amend the Limitations Section of the AFM to
indicate that the AFM Supplement for the STC is not in effect. Place
a placard in the flight deck indicating that the auxiliary tank is
deactivated. The AFM revisions specified in this paragraph may be
accomplished by inserting a copy of this AD into the AFM.
    (8) Amend the applicable sections of the applicable flight crew
operating manual and airplane maintenance manual to remove auxiliary
tank maintenance procedures.
    (9) After the auxiliary fuel tank is deactivated, accomplish
procedures such as leak checks and pressure checks deemed necessary
before returning the airplane to service. These procedures must
include verification that the airplane FQIS and fuel distribution
systems have not been adversely affected.
    (10) Revise the instructions for continued airworthiness, as
required, after deactivation.

    (11) Include with the operator's proposed procedures any
relevant information or additional steps that are deemed necessary
by the operator to comply with the deactivation and return the
airplane to service.

    Issued in Renton, Washington, on September 3, 2010.
Jeffrey E. Duven,
Acting Manager, Transport Airplane Directorate, Aircraft Certification
Service.
[FR Doc. 2010-22679 Filed 9-10-10; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910-13-P


[Federal Register Volume 86, Number 180 (Tuesday, September 21, 2021)]
[Notices]
[Pages 52454-52455]
[FR Doc No: 2021-20385]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission

Combined Notice of Filings

    Take notice that the Commission has received the following Natural
Gas Pipeline Rate and Refund Report filings:

Filings Instituting Proceedings

    Docket Number: PR21-53-001.
    Applicants: Moss Bluff Hub, LLC.
    Description: Tariff filing per 284.123(b),(e)/: Amendment to PR21-
53-000--FERC Housekeeping Items to be effective N/A.
    Filed Date: 9/13/2021.
    Accession Number: 20210913[not]5177.
    Comments/Protests Due: 5 p.m. ET 9/27/21.

    Docket Numbers: PR21-65-000.
    Applicants: Kinder Morgan Texas Pipeline LLC.
    Description: Tariff filing per 284.123(b),(e)/: Informational
Filing Concerning Market-Based Rate Authority under PR08-25 to be
effective N/A.
    Filed Date: 9/3/2021.
    Accession Number: 20210903[not]5177.
    Comments/Protests Due: 5 p.m. ET 9/24/21.

    Docket Numbers: RP21-1109-000.
    Applicants: Iroquois Gas Transmission System, L.P.
    Description: Sec.  4(d) Rate Filing: 9.14.21 Negotiated Rates--
Emera Energy Services, Inc. R-2715-45 to be effective 11/1/2021.
    Filed Date: 9/14/21.
    Accession Number: 20210914-5081.
    Comment Date: 5 p.m. ET 9/27/21.

    Docket Numbers: RP21-1110-000.
    Applicants: Iroquois Gas Transmission System, L.P.
    Description: Sec.  4(d) Rate Filing: 9.14.21 Negotiated Rates--
Emera Energy Services, Inc. R-2715-46 to be effective 11/1/2021.
    Filed Date: 9/14/21.
    Accession Number: 20210914-5084.
    Comment Date: 5 p.m. ET 9/27/21.

    Docket Numbers: RP21-1111-000.
    Applicants: Iroquois Gas Transmission System, L.P.
    Description: Sec.  4(d) Rate Filing: 9.14.21 Negotiated Rates--
Mercuria Energy America, LLC R-7540-02 to be effective 11/1/2021.
    Filed Date: 9/14/21.
    Accession Number: 20210914-5087.
    Comment Date: 5 p.m. ET 9/27/21.

    Docket Numbers: RP21-1112-000.
    Applicants: Iroquois Gas Transmission System, L.P.
    Description: Sec.  4(d) Rate Filing: 9.14.21 Negotiated Rates--
Vitol Inc. R-7495-11 to be effective 11/1/2021.
    Filed Date: 9/14/21.
    Accession Number: 20210914-5090.
    Comment Date: 5 p.m. ET 9/27/21.

    Docket Numbers: RP21-1113-000.
    Applicants: Great Basin Gas Transmission Company.
    Description: Sec.  4(d) Rate Filing: New Baseline Tariff--Original
Version No. 1 to be effective 10/1/2021.
    Filed Date: 9/14/21.
    Accession Number: 20210914-5126.
    Comment Date: 5 p.m. ET 9/27/21.

    Docket Numbers: RP20-908-004.
    Applicants: Alliance Pipeline L.P.
    Description: Compliance filing: Alliance RP20-908 Compliance Filing
to be effective 12/1/2020.
    Filed Date: 9/14/21.
    Accession Number: 20210914-5119.
    Comment Date: 5 p.m. ET 9/27/21.

    Any person desiring to protest in any the above proceedings must
file in accordance with Rule 211 of the Commission's Regulations (18
CFR 385.211) on or before 5:00 p.m. Eastern time on the specified
comment date.
    The filings are accessible in the Commission's eLibrary system
(https://

elibrary.ferc.gov/idmws/search/fercgensearch.asp) by querying the
docket number.
    eFiling is encouraged. More detailed information relating to filing
requirements, interventions, protests, service, and qualifying
facilities filings can be found at: http://www.ferc.gov/docs-filing/efiling/filing-req.pdf. For other information, call<PHONE_NUMBER>
(toll free). For TTY, call<PHONE_NUMBER>.

    Dated: September 15, 2021.
Debbie-Anne A. Reese,
Deputy Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2021-20385 Filed 9-20-21; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6717-01-P


[Federal Register: June 29, 2006 (Volume 71, Number 125)]
[Notices]
[Page 37073-37074]
[DOCID:fr29jn06-49]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission

Notice of Application Accepted for Filing and Soliciting Motions
To Intervene, Protests, and Comments

June 22, 2006.
    Take notice that the following hydroelectric application has been
filed with the Commission and is available for public inspection:
    a. Type of Application: Preliminary Permit.
    b. Project No: 12692-000.
    c. Date filed: June 15, 2006.
    d. Applicant: Public Utility District No. 1 of Snohomish County,
Washington.
    e. Name of Project: San Juan Channel Tidal Energy Project.
    f. Location: The project would be located in San Juan Channel in
the San Juan Islands in San Juan County, Washington.
    g. Filed Pursuant to: Federal Power Act, 16 U.S.C. 791(a)-825(r).
    h. Applicant Contacts: Mr. Steven Klein, General Manager, P.O. Box
1107, 2320 California Street, Everett, WA 98206,<PHONE_NUMBER>.
    i. FERC Contact: Chris Yeakel,<PHONE_NUMBER>.
    j. Deadline for filing comments, protests, and motions to
intervene: 60 days from the issuance date of this notice.
    The Commission's Rules of Practice and Procedure require all
intervenors filing documents with the Commission to serve a copy of
that document on each person in the official service list for the
project. Further, if an intervenor files comments or documents with the
Commission relating to the merits of an issue that may affect the
responsibilities of a particular resource agency, they must also serve
a copy of the document on that resource agency.
    k. Description of Project: The proposed project would consist of:
(1) 116 Tidal In Stream Energy Conversion (TISEC) devices consisting
of, (2) rotating propeller blades 20 meters in diameter, (3) integrated
generators with a capacity of 46 kW, (4) anchoring systems, (5) mooring
lines, and (6) interconnection transmission lines. The project is
estimated to have an annual generation of 33.27 gigawatt-hours per-
year, which would be distributed by the Snohomish County Public Utility
District.
    l. Locations of Applications: A copy of the application is
available for inspection and reproduction at the Commission in the
Public Reference Room, located at 888 First Street NE., Room 2A,
Washington, DC 20426, or by calling<PHONE_NUMBER>. This filing may
also be viewed on the Commission's Web site at http://www.ferc.gov

using the ``eLibrary'' link. Enter the docket number excluding the last
three digits in the docket number field to access the document. For
assistance, call toll-free 1-866-208-3676 or e-mail
<EMAIL_ADDRESS>For TTY, call<PHONE_NUMBER>. A copy is

also available for inspection and reproduction at the address in item h
above.
    m. Individuals desiring to be included on the Commission's mailing
list should so indicate by writing to the Secretary of the Commission.
    n. Competing Preliminary Permit: Anyone desiring to file a
competing application for preliminary permit for a proposed project
must submit the competing application itself, or a notice of intent to
file such an application, to the Commission on or before the specified
comment date for the particular application (see 18 CFR 4.36).
Submission of a timely notice of intent allows an interested person to
file the competing preliminary permit application no later than 30 days
after the specified comment date for the particular application. A
competing preliminary permit application must conform with 18 CFR
4.30(b) and 4.36.
    o. Competing Development Application: Any qualified development
applicant desiring to file a competing development application must
submit to the Commission, on or before a specified comment date for the
particular application, either a competing development application or a
notice of intent to file such an application. Submission of a timely
notice of intent to file a development application allows an interested
person to file the competing application no later than 120 days after
the specified comment date for the particular application. A competing
license application must conform with 18 CFR 4.30(b) and 4.36.
    p. Notice of Intent: A notice of intent must specify the exact
name, business address, and telephone number of the prospective
applicant, and must include an unequivocal statement of intent to
submit, if such an application may be filed, either a preliminary
permit application or a development application (specify which type of
application). A notice of intent must be served on the applicant(s)
named in this public notice.
    q. Proposed Scope of Studies Under Permit: A preliminary permit, if
issued, does not authorize construction. The term of the proposed
preliminary permit would be 36 months. The work proposed under the
preliminary permit would include economic analysis, preparation of
preliminary engineering plans, and a study of environmental impacts.
Based on the results of these studies, the Applicant would decide
whether to proceed with the preparation of a development application to
construct and operate the project.
    r. Comments, Protests, or Motions to Intervene: Anyone may submit
comments, a protest, or a motion to intervene in accordance with the
requirements of Rules of Practice and Procedure, 18 CFR 385.210, .211,
.214. In determining the appropriate action to take, the Commission
will consider all protests or other comments filed, but only those who
file a motion to intervene in accordance with the Commission's Rules
may become a party to the proceeding. Any comments, protests, or
motions to intervene must be received on or before the specified
comment date for the particular application.
    Comments, protests and interventions may be filed electronically
via the Internet in lieu of paper; See 18 C.F.R. 385.2001(a)(1)(iii)
and the instructions on the Commission's Web site under ``e-filing''
link. The Commission strongly encourages electronic filing.
    s. Filing and Service of Responsive Documents: Any filings must
bear in all capital letters the title ``COMMENTS'', ``RECOMMENDATIONS
FOR TERMS AND CONDITIONS'', ``PROTEST'', ``COMPETING APPLICATION'' or
``MOTION TO INTERVENE'', as applicable, and the Project Number of the
particular application to which the filing refers. Any of the above-
named documents must be filed by providing the original and the number
of copies provided by the Commission's regulations to: The Secretary,
Federal Energy Regulatory Commission, 888 First Street, NE.,
Washington, DC 20426. A copy of any motion to intervene must also be
served upon each representative of the Applicant specified in the
particular application.
    t. Agency Comments: Federal, state, and local agencies are invited
to file comments on the described application. A copy of the
application may be obtained by agencies directly from the Applicant. If
an agency does not file comments within the time specified for filing
comments, it will be presumed to have no comments. One copy of an

agency's comments must also be sent to the Applicant's representatives.

Magalie R. Salas,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. E6-10169 Filed 6-27-06; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 6717-01-P