[Federal Register Volume 76, Number 25 (Monday, February 7, 2011)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Pages 6525-6529]
[FR Doc No: 2011-2008]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION

Federal Aviation Administration

14 CFR Part 39

[Docket No. FAA-2009-1186; Directorate Identifier 2009-CE-065-AD;
Amendment 39-16588; AD 2011-03-04]
RIN 2120-AA64

Airworthiness Directives; Cessna Aircraft Company (Type
Certificate Previously Held by Columbia Aircraft Manufacturing
(Previously the Lancair Company)) Models LC40-550FG, LC41-550FG, and
LC42-550FG Airplanes

AGENCY: Federal Aviation Administration (FAA), DOT.

ACTION: Final rule.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: We are superseding an existing airworthiness directive (AD)
for the products listed above. AD 2009-09-09 currently requires
repetitive inspections of the rudder hinges and the rudder hinge
brackets for damage, i.e., cracking, deformation, and discoloration. If
damage is found during any inspection, AD 2009-09-09 also requires
replacing the damaged rudder hinge and/or rudder hinge bracket. This
new AD retains the inspection requirements of AD 2009-09-09, adds
airplanes to the Applicability section, and adds a terminating action
for the repetitive inspection requirements. This AD resulted from the
manufacturer developing a modification that terminates the repetitive
inspections and from the manufacture adding airplane serial numbers
into the Applicability section. We are issuing this AD to detect and
correct damage in the rudder hinges and the rudder hinge brackets,
which could result in failure of the rudder. This failure could lead to
loss of control.

DATES: This AD is effective March 14, 2011.
    The Director of the Federal Register approved the incorporation by
reference of certain publications listed in the AD as of March 14,
2011.
    The Director of the Federal Register approved the incorporation by
reference of a certain publication listed in this AD as of May 11, 2009
(74 FR 19873, April 30, 2009).

ADDRESSES: For service information identified in this AD, contact
Cessna Aircraft Company, Product Support, P.O. Box 7706; Wichita,
Kansas 67277; telephone:<PHONE_NUMBER>; fax:<PHONE_NUMBER>; Internet:
http://www.cessna.com. You may review copies of the referenced service
information at the FAA, Small Airplane Directorate, 901 Locust, Kansas
City, Missouri 64106. For information on the availability of this
material at the FAA, call<PHONE_NUMBER>.

Examining the AD Docket

    You may examine the AD docket on the Internet at http://www.regulations.gov; or in person at the Docket Management Facility
between 9 a.m. and 5 p.m., Monday through Friday, except Federal
holidays. The AD docket contains this AD, the regulatory evaluation,
any comments received, and other information. The address for the
Docket Office (phone:<PHONE_NUMBER>) is Document Management Facility,
U.S. Department of Transportation, Docket Operations, M-30, West
Building Ground Floor, Room W12-140, 1200

New Jersey Avenue SE., Washington, DC 20590.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Gary Park, Aerospace Engineer, Wichita
Aircraft Certification Office, FAA, 1801 Airport Road, Room 100,
Wichita, Kansas 67209; telephone:<PHONE_NUMBER>; fax:<PHONE_NUMBER>;
e-mail<EMAIL_ADDRESS>
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

Discussion

    We issued a supplemental notice of proposed rulemaking (SNPRM) to
amend 14 CFR part 39 to supersede AD 2009-09-09, Amendment 39-15895 (74
FR 19873, April 30, 2009). That AD applies to the specified products.
The SNPRM published in the Federal Register on October 27, 2010 (75 FR
66009). That SNPRM proposed to retain the inspection requirements of AD
2009-09-09, add airplanes to the Applicability section, and add a
terminating action for the repetitive inspection requirements using
revised service information.

Comments

    We gave the public the opportunity to participate in developing
this AD. We received no comments on the SNPRM or on the determination
of the cost to the public.

Conclusion

    We reviewed the relevant data and determined that air safety and
the public interest require adopting the AD as proposed except for
minor editorial changes. We have determined that these minor changes:
     Are consistent with the intent that was proposed in the
SNPRM for correcting the unsafe condition; and
     Do not add any additional burden upon the public than was
already proposed in the SNPRM.

Costs of Compliance

    We estimate that this proposed AD affects 790 airplanes of U.S.
registry.
    We estimate the following costs to comply with this AD:

                                                                     Estimated Costs
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
               Action                         Labor cost                Parts cost           Cost per product             Cost on U.S. operators
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Inspecting the rudder hinges and     1.5 work-hours x $85 per     Not applicable........  $127.50 per            $72,675 per inspection cycle.
 rudder hinge brackets for damage     hour = $127.50 per                                   inspection cycle.
 with rudder removed (affects 570     inspection cycle.
 airplanes).
Inspecting the rudder hinges and     .5 work-hour x $85 per hour  Not applicable........  $42.50 per inspection  $24,225 per inspection cycle.
 rudder hinge brackets for damage     = $42.50 per inspection                              cycle.
 without rudder removed (affects      cycle.
 570 airplanes).
Incorporating the modification kit   1 work-hour x $85 per hour   $739..................  $824.................  $203,528.
 for Models LC40-550FG and LC42-      = $85.
 550FG airplanes (affects 247
 airplanes).
Incorporating the modification kit   1 work-hour x $85 per hour   $848..................  $933.................  $487,959.
 for Model LC41-550FG airplanes       = $85.
 (affects 523 airplanes).
Inspecting the rudder hinge and the  .5 work-hour x $85 per hour  Not applicable........  $42.50...............  $850.
 rudder brackets attachment           = $42.50.
 hardware for correct thread
 engagement (affects 20 airplanes).
Inspecting the rudder travel         1 work-hour x $85 per hour   Not applicable........  $85..................  $1,700.
 (affects 20 airplanes).              = $85.
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

    We estimate the following costs to do any necessary repairs that
will be required based on the results of the inspection of the rudder
hinge and the rudder brackets attachment hardware for correct thread
engagement and the rudder travel. We have no way of determining the
number of aircraft that might need these repairs:

                                               On-Condition Costs
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
                                                                                Cost per
                    Action                                 Labor cost               Parts cost        product
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Repair the rudder hinge and the rudder          .5 work-hour x $85 per hour =                $14          $56.50
 brackets attachment hardware thread             $42.50.
 engagement (could affect 20 airplanes).
Repair the rudder travel (could affect 20       .5 work-hour x $85 per hour =                 14           56.50
 airplanes).                                     $42.50.
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Authority for This Rulemaking

    Title 49 of the United States Code specifies the FAA's authority to
issue rules on aviation safety. Subtitle I, Section 106, describes the
authority of the FAA Administrator. Subtitle VII, Aviation Programs,
describes in more detail the scope of the Agency's authority.
    We are issuing this rulemaking under the authority described in
Subtitle VII, Part A, Subpart III, Section 44701, ``General
requirements.'' Under that section, Congress charges the FAA with
promoting safe flight of civil aircraft in air commerce by prescribing
regulations for practices, methods, and procedures the Administrator
finds necessary for safety in air commerce. This regulation is within
the scope of that authority because it addresses an unsafe condition
that is likely to exist or develop on products identified in this
rulemaking action.

Regulatory Findings

    We have determined that this AD will not have federalism
implications under Executive Order 13132. This AD will not have a
substantial direct effect on the States, on the relationship between
the national government and the States, or on the distribution of power
and responsibilities among the various levels of government.
    For the reasons discussed above, I certify that this AD:
    (1) Is not a ``significant regulatory action'' under Executive
Order 12866,
    (2) Is not a ``significant rule'' under DOT Regulatory Policies and
Procedures (44 FR 11034, February 26, 1979),
    (3) Will not affect intrastate aviation in Alaska, and
    (4) Will not have a significant economic impact, positive or
negative, on a substantial number of small entities under the criteria
of the Regulatory Flexibility Act.

List of Subjects in 14 CFR Part 39

    Air transportation, Aircraft, Aviation safety, Incorporation by
reference, Safety.

Adoption of the Amendment

    Accordingly, under the authority delegated to me by the
Administrator, the FAA amends 14 CFR part 39 as follows:

PART 39--AIRWORTHINESS DIRECTIVES

0
1. The authority citation for part 39 continues to read as follows:

    Authority: 49 U.S.C. 106(g), 40113, 44701.

Sec.  39.13  [Amended]

0
2. The FAA amends Sec.  39.13 by removing Airworthiness Directive (AD)
2009-09-09, Amendment 39-15895 (74 FR 19873, April 30, 2009), and
adding the following new AD:

2011-03-04 Cessna Aircraft Company (Type Certificate Previously Held
by Columbia Aircraft Manufacturing (Previously The Lancair
Company)): Amendment 39-16588; Docket No. FAA-2009-1186; Directorate
Identifier 2009-CE-065-AD.

Effective Date

    (a) This airworthiness directive (AD) is effective March 14,
2011.

Affected ADs

    (b) This AD supersedes AD 2009-09-09, Amendment 39-15895.

Applicability

    (c) This AD applies to the following Cessna Aircraft Company
(type certificate previously held by Columbia Aircraft Manufacturing
(previously The Lancair Company)) airplane models and serial numbers
that are certificated in any category:

                            Group 1 Airplanes
------------------------------------------------------------------------
               Model                             Serial Nos.
------------------------------------------------------------------------
LC40-550FG (300)..................  40001, 40002, and 40004 through
                                     40079.
LC41-550FG (400)..................  41001 through 41569, 41571 through
                                     41800, 411001 through 411087,
                                     411089 through 411110, 411112
                                     through 411138, 411140, 411142, and
                                     411147.
LC42-550FG (350)..................  42001 through 42009, 42011 through
                                     42558, 42560 through 42569, 421001
                                     through 421013, 421015 through
                                     421017, and 421019.
------------------------------------------------------------------------

                            Group 2 Airplanes
------------------------------------------------------------------------
               Model                             Serial Nos.
------------------------------------------------------------------------
LC41-550FG (400)..................  41570, 411088, 411111, 411139,
                                     411141, 411143 through 411146, and
                                     411148 through 411153.
LC42-550FG (350)..................  42010, 42559, 421014, 421018, and
                                     421020.
------------------------------------------------------------------------

Subject

    (d) Joint Aircraft System Component (JASC)/Air Transport
Association (ATA) of America Code 55, Stabilizers.

Unsafe Condition

    (e) This AD is the result of reports received of a cracked lower
rudder hinge bracket on two of the affected airplanes. We are
issuing this AD to detect and correct damage, i.e., cracking,
deformation, and discoloration, in the rudder hinges and the rudder
hinge brackets, which could result in failure of the rudder. This
failure could lead to loss of control.

Compliance

    (f) To address this problem, you must do the following, unless
already done:
    (1) For Group 1 airplanes specified in paragraph (c) of this AD:
Using the compliance times specified in table 1 of this AD, inspect
the rudder hinges and rudder hinge brackets for damage, i.e.,
cracking, deformation, and discoloration. Do the inspections
following Cessna Single Engine Service Bulletin SB09-27-01, dated
April 13, 2009; Cessna Single Engine Service Bulletin SB09-27-01,
Revision 2, dated November 23, 2009; or Cessna Single Engine Service
Bulletin SB09-27-01, Revision 3, dated July 20, 2010.

                  Table 1--Inspection Compliance Times
------------------------------------------------------------------------
                               Initially inspect .  Repetitively inspect
          Condition                    . .                  . . .
------------------------------------------------------------------------
(i) For airplanes with 25     With the rudder       Thereafter inspect
 hours time-in-service (TIS)   removed and using     as follows until
 or more as of May 11, 2009    10X visual            the modification
 (the effective date of AD     magnification,        required in
 2009-09-09).                  inspect all three     paragraph (f)(5) of
                               rudder hinges and     this AD is done:
                               rudder hinge         (A) Every 25 hours
                               brackets at           TIS or 3 months,
                               whichever of the      whichever occurs
                               following occurs      first, without
                               first                 removing the
                              (A) Within the next    rudder, visually
                               10 hours TIS after    inspect all three
                               May 11, 2009 (the     rudder hinges and
                               effective date of     rudder hinge
                               AD 2009-09-09); or.   brackets; and
                              (B) Within the next   (B) Every 50 hours
                               30 days after May     TIS or 6 months,
                               11, 2009 (the         whichever occurs
                               effective date of     first, with the
                               AD 009-09-09).        rudder removed and
                                                     using 10X visual
                                                     magnification,
                                                     inspect all three
                                                     rudder hinges and
                                                     rudder hinge
                                                     brackets.
(ii) For airplanes with less  Without removing the  Thereafter inspect
 than 25 hours TIS as of May   rudder, visually      as follows until
 11, 2009 (the effective       inspect all three     the modification
 date of AD 2009-09-09).       rudder hinges and     required in
                               rudder hinge          paragraph (f)(5) of
                               brackets, at          this AD is done:
                               whichever of the     (A) Every 25 hours
                               following occurs      TIS or 3 months,
                               later.                whichever occurs
                              (A) Upon               first, without
                               accumulating 25       removing the
                               hours TIS; or.        rudder, visually
                              (B) Within the next    inspect all three
                               10 hours TIS after    rudder hinges and
                               May 11, 2009 (the     rudder hinge
                               effective date of     brackets; and
                               AD 2009-09-09).      (B) Every 50 hours
                                                     TIS or 6 months,
                                                     whichever occurs
                                                     first, with the
                                                     rudder removed and
                                                     using 10X visual
                                                     magnification,
                                                     inspect all three
                                                     rudder hinges and
                                                     rudder hinge
                                                     brackets.
------------------------------------------------------------------------

     (2) For Group 1 airplanes specified in paragraph (c) of this
AD: Before further flight after any inspection required in
paragraphs (f)(1)(i) or (f)(1)(ii) of this AD in which damage is
found on any of the rudder hinges and/or rudder hinge brackets,
incorporate Cessna Single Engine Modification Kit MK400-27-01, dated
November 23, 2009; or Cessna Single Engine Modification Kit MK400-
27-01A dated July 20, 2010, as specified in Cessna Single Engine
Service Bulletin SB09-27-01, Revision 2, dated November 23, 2009;
and Cessna Single Engine Service Bulletin SB09-27-01, Revision 3,
dated July 20, 2010. Incorporating either Modification Kit MK400-27-
01 or Modification Kit MK400-27-01A, terminates the repetitive
inspections required in paragraphs (f)(1)(i) and (f)(1)(ii) of this
AD.
    (3) For Group 1 airplanes specified in paragraph (c) of this AD:
If the repetitive inspections required in paragraphs (f)(1)(i) and
(f)(1)(ii) of this AD become due at the same time, credit for both
inspections will be given by doing the rudder removal and 10X visual
inspection.
    (4) For Group 1 airplanes specified in paragraph (c) of this AD:
Within the next 24 months after March 14, 2011 (the effective date
of this AD), incorporate Cessna Single Engine Modification Kit
MK400-27-01, dated November 23, 2009; or Cessna Single Engine
Modification Kit MK400-27-01A, dated July 20, 2010, as specified in
Cessna Single Engine Service Bulletin SB09-27-01, Revision 2, dated
November 23, 2009; and Cessna Single Engine Service Bulletin SB09-
27-01, Revision 3, dated July 20, 2010, unless already done as
specified in paragraph (f)(2) of this AD. Incorporating either
Modification Kit MK400-27-01 or Modification Kit MK400-27-01A,
terminates the repetitive inspections required in paragraphs
(f)(1)(i) and (f)(1)(ii) of this AD.
    (5) For Group 1 airplanes specified in paragraph (c) of this AD:
At any time after the initial inspections required in paragraphs
(f)(1)(i) and (f)(1)(ii) of this AD, as long as no damage is found,
and no later than the compliance time specified in paragraph (f)(4)
of this AD, you may incorporate Cessna Single Engine Modification
Kit MK400-27-01, dated November 23, 2009; or Cessna Single Engine
Modification Kit MK400-27-01A, dated July 20, 2010, as specified in
Cessna Single Engine Service Bulletin SB09-27-01, Revision 2, dated
November 23, 2009; and Cessna Single Engine Service Bulletin SB09-
27-01, Revision 3, dated July 20, 2010, to terminate the repetitive
inspections required in paragraphs (f)(1)(i) and (f)(1)(ii) of this
AD.
    (6) For any Group 1 airplane with Cessna Single Engine Service
Bulletin SB09-27-01, Revision 1, dated August 31, 2009, already
incorporated and for all Group 2 airplanes: Within the next 30 days
after March 14, 2011 (the effective date of this AD), inspect for
proper rudder hinge and rudder bracket hardware thread engagement
and inspect the rudder travel. Do these inspections following the
Accomplishment Instructions in Cessna Single Engine Modification Kit
MK400-27-01, dated November 23, 2009; or the Accomplishment
Instructions in Cessna Single Engine Modification Kit MK400-27-01A,
dated July 20, 2010.
    (i) Before further flight after the inspection required in
paragraph (f)(6) of this AD, if any discrepancies are found in the
rudder hinge or rudder bracket hardware, replace the affected
hardware. Do the replacements following the Accomplishment
Instructions in Cessna Single Engine Modification Kit MK400-27-01,
dated November 23, 2009; or the Accomplishment Instructions in
Cessna Single Engine Modification Kit MK400-27-01A, dated July 20,
2010.
    (ii) Before further flight after the inspection required in
paragraph (f)(6) of this AD, if the rudder travel is outside the
limits specified in the Accomplishment Instructions in Cessna Single
Engine Modification Kit MK400-27-01, dated November 23, 2009; or the
Accomplishment Instructions in Cessna Single Engine Modification Kit
MK400-27-01A, dated July 20, 2010, reinstall the rudder following
the Accomplishment Instructions in either Cessna Single Engine
Modification Kit MK400-27-01, dated November 23, 2009; or Cessna
Single Engine Modification Kit MK400-27-01A, dated July 20, 2010.
    (iii) After the inspection and any necessary corrective actions
required in paragraphs (f)(6), (f)(6)(i), and (f)(6)(ii) of this AD,
no further action is required.

Credit for Actions Accomplished in Accordance With Previous Service
Information

    (g) For all airplanes specified in paragraph (c) of this AD: As
of March 14, 2011 (the effective date of this AD), if Cessna Single
Engine Service Bulletin SB09-27-01, Revision 2, dated November 23,
2009, has already been incorporated, no further action is required.

Alternative Methods of Compliance (AMOCs)

    (h)(1) The Manager, Wichita Aircraft Certification Office (ACO),
FAA, has the authority to approve AMOCs for this AD, if requested
using the procedures found in 14 CFR 39.19. In accordance with 14
CFR 39.19, send your request to your principal inspector or local
Flight Standards District Office, as appropriate. If sending
information directly to the manager of the ACO, send it to the
attention of the person identified in the Related Information
section of this AD.
    (2) Before using any approved AMOC, notify your Principal
Maintenance Inspector or Principal Avionics Inspector, as
appropriate, or lacking a principal inspector, your local Flight
Standards District Office.
    (3) AMOCs approved for AD 2009-09-09 are approved for this AD.

Related Information

    (i) For more information about this AD, contact Gary Park,
Aerospace Engineer, Wichita ACO, FAA, 1801 Airport Road, Room 100,
Wichita, Kansas 67209; telephone:<PHONE_NUMBER>; fax: (316) 946-
4107; e-mail<EMAIL_ADDRESS>
Material Incorporated by Reference

    (j) You must use Cessna Single Engine Service Bulletin SB09-27-
01, dated April 13, 2009; Cessna Single Engine Service Bulletin
SB09-27-01, Revision 2, dated November 23, 2009; Cessna Single
Engine Service Bulletin SB09-27-01, Revision 3, dated July 20, 2010;

Cessna Single Engine Modification Kit MK400-27-01, dated November
23, 2009; and Cessna Single Engine Modification Kit MK400-27-01A,
dated July 20, 2010, to do the actions required by this AD, unless
the AD specifies otherwise.
    (1) The Director of the Federal Register approved the
incorporation by reference of Cessna Single Engine Service Bulletin
SB09-27-01, Revision 2, dated November 23, 2009; and Cessna Single
Engine Service Bulletin SB09-27-01, Revision 3, dated July 20, 2010;
Cessna Single Engine Modification Kit MK400-27-01, dated November
23, 2009; and Cessna Single Engine Modification Kit MK400-27-01A,
dated July 20, 2010, under 5 U.S.C. 552(a) and 1 CFR part 51.
    (2) The Director of the Federal Register previously approved the
incorporation by reference of Cessna Single Engine Service Bulletin
SB09-27-01, dated April 13, 2009, on May 11, 2009 (74 FR 19873,
April 30, 2009).
    (3) For service information identified in this AD, contact
Cessna Aircraft Company, Product Support, P.O. Box 7706; Wichita,
Kansas 67277; telephone:<PHONE_NUMBER>; fax:<PHONE_NUMBER>;
Internet: http://www.cessna.com.
    (4) You may review copies of the service information at the FAA,
Small Airplane Directorate, 901 Locust, Kansas City, Missouri 64106.
For information on the availability of this material at the FAA,
call<PHONE_NUMBER>.
    (5) You may also review copies of the service information that
is incorporated by reference at the National Archives and Records
Administration (NARA). For information on the availability of this
material at an NARA facility, call<PHONE_NUMBER>, or go to http://www.archives.gov/federal_register/code_of_federal_regulations/ibr_locations.html.

    Issued in Kansas City, Missouri, on January 25, 2011.
John Colomy,
Acting Manager, Small Airplane Directorate, Aircraft Certification
Service.
[FR Doc. 2011-2008 Filed 2-4-11; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910-13-P


[Federal Register Volume 79, Number 97 (Tuesday, May 20, 2014)]
[Notices]
[Pages 28919-28920]
[FR Doc No: 2014-11698]

=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY

[FRL-9911-18-Region-4; EPA-R04-OAR-2013-0647 and EPA-R04-OAR-2014-0023]

Notice of Issuance of Final Air Permits for EFS Shady Hills,
LLC--Shady Hills Generating Station, and New Hope Power Company--
Okeelanta Cogeneration Station.

AGENCY: Environmental Protection Agency.

ACTION: Notice of final action.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) is announcing that
on January 14, 2014, and March 17, 2014, the agency issued final
Prevention of Significant Deterioration (PSD) air quality permits
numbered PSD-EPA-R4013 and PSD-EPA-R4016 for the EFS Shady Hills, LLC
(Shady Hills)--Shady Hills Generating Station (SHGS) and New Hope Power
Company (NHPC)--Okeelanta Cogeneration Station (Okeelanta),
respectively.

ADDRESSES: The final permits, the EPA's response to public comments for
these permits, and supporting information are available at http://www.epa.gov/region4/air/permits/index.htm. Copies of the final permits
and the EPA's response to comments are also available for review at the
EPA Regional Office and upon request in writing. The EPA requests that
you contact the person listed in the FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT
section to schedule your inspection. The Regional Office's official
hours of business are Monday through Friday, 8:30 a.m. to 4:30 p.m.
excluding Federal holidays.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Please contact Ms. Heather Ceron, Air
Permits Section Chief, Air Planning Branch, Air, Pesticides and Toxics
Management Division, Region 4, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, 61
Forsyth Street SW., Atlanta, Georgia 30303-8960. The telephone number
is<PHONE_NUMBER>. Ms. Ceron can also be reached via electronic mail at
<EMAIL_ADDRESS>
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: On September 24, 2013, EPA Region 4
requested public comments on a preliminary determination to issue a

PSD air quality permit for the Shady Hills SHGS project. A total of 60
comments from 2 commenters were received (via email and the
regulations.com site) during the public comment period, which closed on
October 24, 2013.
    On January 23, 2014, EPA Region 4 requested public comments on a
preliminary determination to issue a PSD air quality permit for the
NHPC Okeelanta project. A total of 9 comments from one commenter were
received (via email) during the public comment period, which closed on
February 24, 2014.
    The EPA reviewed each comment received and prepared a Response to
Comments document for each of the two projects. After consideration of
the expressed view of all interested persons, the pertinent Federal
statutes and regulations, the applications and supplemental information
submitted by the applicants, and additional material relevant to the
applications and contained in the Administrative Records, the EPA made
final determinations in accordance with title 40 CFR part 52 to issue
final air permits.
    Under 40 CFR 124.19(f)(2), notice of any final Agency action
regarding a PSD permit must be published in the Federal Register.
Section 307(b)(1) of the Clean Air Act (CAA) provides for review of
final Agency action that is locally or regionally applicable in the
United States Court of Appeals for the appropriate circuit. Such a
petition for review of final Agency action must be filed within 60 days
from the date of notice of such action in the Federal Register. For
purposes of judicial review under the CAA, final Agency action occurs
when a final PSD permit is issued or denied by the EPA and Agency
review procedures are exhausted, per 40 CFR 124.19(f)(1).
    Any person who filed comments on the draft permits was provided the
opportunity to petition the Environmental Appeals Board by the end of
February 14, 2014, for the Shady Hills permit, or by the end of April
17, 2014, for the NHPC permit. No petitions were submitted for either
of these permits. Therefore, the Shady Hills permit became effective on
February 15, 2014. The NHPC permit became effective on April 18, 2014.

    Dated: May 2, 2014.
Beverly H. Banister,
Director, Air, Pesticides and Toxics, Management Division, Region 4.
[FR Doc. 2014-11698 Filed 5-19-14; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6560-50-P


[Federal Register: December 23, 2008 (Volume 73, Number 247)]
[Notices]
[Page 78783-78784]
[DOCID:fr23de08-76]

=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY

[EPA-HQ-OECA-2008-0696; FRL-8756-2]

Agency Information Collection Activities; Submission to OMB for
Review and Approval; Comment Request; Enforcement Policy Regarding the
Sale and Use of Aftermarket Catalytic Converters; EPA ICR No. 1292.08,
OMB Control No. 2060-0135

AGENCY: Environmental Protection Agency (EPA).

ACTION: Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: In compliance with the Paperwork Reduction Act (PRA) (44
U.S.C. 3501 et seq.), this document announces that an Information
Collection Request (ICR) has been forwarded to the Office of Management
and Budget (OMB) for review and approval. This is a request to renew an
existing approved collection. The ICR, which is abstracted below,
describes the nature of the information collection and its estimated
burden and cost.

DATES: Additional comments may be submitted on or before January 22,
2009.

ADDRESSES: Submit your comments, referencing Docket ID No. EPA-HQ-OECA-
2008-0696, to (1) EPA online using www.regulations.gov (our preferred
method), by e-mail to<EMAIL_ADDRESS>or by mail to: EPA Docket
Center, Environmental Protection Agency, Mail Code 2822T, 1200
Pennsylvania Ave., NW., Washington, DC 20460, and (2) OMB by mail to:
Office of Information and Regulatory Affairs, Office of Management and
Budget (OMB), Attention: Desk Officer for EPA, 725 17th Street, NW.,
Washington, DC 20503.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Anne Wick, Air Enforcement Division
(2242A), Environmental Protection Agency, 1200 Pennsylvania Ave., NW.,
Washington, DC 20460; telephone number:<PHONE_NUMBER>; fax number:
(202) 564-0069; e-mail address<EMAIL_ADDRESS>
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: EPA has submitted the following ICR to OMB
for review and approval according to the procedures prescribed in 5 CFR
1320.12. On September 30, 2008 (73 FR 56817), EPA sought comments on
this ICR pursuant to 5 CFR 1320.8(d). EPA received no comments. Any
additional comments on this ICR should be submitted to EPA and OMB
within 30 days of this notice.
    EPA has established a public docket for this ICR under Docket ID
No. EPA-HQ-OECA-2008-0696, which is available for online viewing at
www.regulations.gov, or in person viewing at the Enforcement and
Compliance Docket in the EPA Docket Center (EPA/DC), EPA West, Room
3334, 1301 Constitution Ave., NW., Washington, DC. The EPA/DC Public
Reading Room is open from 8:30 a.m. to 4:30 p.m., Monday through
Friday, excluding legal holidays. The telephone number for the Reading
Room is<PHONE_NUMBER>, and the telephone number for the Enforcement and
Compliance Docket is<PHONE_NUMBER>.
    Use EPA's electronic docket and comment system at
www.regulations.gov, to submit or view public comments, access the
index listing of the contents of the docket, and to access those
documents in the docket that are available electronically. Once in the
system, select ``docket search,'' then key in the docket ID number
identified above. Please note that EPA's policy is that public
comments, whether submitted electronically or in paper, will be made
available for public viewing at www.regulations.gov as EPA receives
them and without change, unless the comment contains copyrighted
material, confidential business information (CBI), or other information
whose public disclosure is restricted by statute. For further
information about the electronic docket, go to www.regulations.gov.
    Title: Enforcement Policy Regarding the Sale and Use of Aftermarket
Catalytic Converters (Renewal).
    ICR numbers: EPA ICR No. 1292.08, OMB Control No. 2060-0135.
    ICR Status: This ICR is scheduled to expire on December 31, 2008.
Under OMB regulations, the Agency may continue to conduct or sponsor
the collection of information while this submission is pending at OMB.
An Agency may not conduct or sponsor, and a person is not required to
respond to, a collection of information, unless it displays a currently
valid OMB control number. The OMB control numbers for EPA's regulations
in title 40 of the CFR, after appearing in the Federal Register when
approved, are listed in 40 CFR part 9, are displayed either by
publication in the Federal Register or by other appropriate means, such
as on the related collection instrument or form, if applicable. The
display of OMB control numbers in certain EPA regulations is
consolidated in 40 CFR part 9.
    Abstract: The aftermarket catalytic converter policy (AMCC Policy)
(51 FR 28114-28119, 28113 (Aug. 5, 1986); 52 FR 42144 (Nov. 3, 1987))
allows aftermarket automobile catalytic converter (AMCC) manufacturers
and reconditioners to compete with the automobile manufacturers for the
AMCC replacement market. Without this policy, it would be illegal,
under section 203 of the Clean Air Act, 42 U.S.C. 7522, to sell or
install AMCCs that do not conform exactly to the automobile
manufacturers' original equipment (OE) versions of these parts. The
AMCC Policy makes it possible for automobile repair shops, which are
often small businesses, to take on a significant share of the AMCC
replacement market. In doing so, consumers are able to purchase AMCCs
at a much lower price than they would pay for an OE catalytic
converter. This helps to ensure that vehicles will not create excessive
air pollution because motorists are more likely to replace damaged
catalytic converters if they can be obtained at a cost that is
significantly less than OE catalytic converters (cost savings resulting
from the AMCC Policy are estimated to be about $716 million in 2007
dollars).
    New AMCC manufacturers are required to report, on a one-time basis
for each type or line of converter manufactured, the supplier
identities, physical specifications of each AMCC line produced, and
information regarding pre-production testing of the AMCCs that show
they meet the AMCC Policy emission reduction standards for certain
specified vehicle applications (a single AMCC line can be used on a
large number of vehicle applications). The current AMCC Policy requires
new AMCC manufacturers to retain warranty and sales records.
    Reconditioners (sellers of used catalytic converters) must report,
on a one-time basis, the identity of the company, a description of the
test bench used for testing used catalytic converters, and the intended
vehicle application(s) for each catalytic converter type. All used
catalytic converters must be tested individually to ensure they are
still functional. The current AMCC Policy also requires reconditioners
to retain sales and customer records.
    Installers of AMCCs have no reporting requirements. They must fill
out a written warranty and give it to the retail customer, include a
brief statement with each invoice stating the need for replacing the
original converter, and tag each removed converter with a reference to
the invoice for repair, retain the replaced (tagged) catalytic
converters for 15 days, and retain the invoices for 6 months.
    The reporting and recordkeeping requirements for manufacturers of
new AMCCs and sellers of reconditioned

catalytic converters help ensure that proper AMCCs are manufactured/
tested and distributed to installers and help ensure proper retail
level installation of AMCCs. The installer requirements enable EPA to
monitor whether correct AMCCs are installed at the retail level and
whether AMCCs are used only in appropriate circumstances (i.e., where
the OE catalytic converter is damaged or missing, or the vehicle is no
longer covered under its emissions warranty).
    The information required to be maintained or reported is not
otherwise available and is not covered under any other information
request since it is unique to the AMCC Policy. The collection of
information is necessary for the proper performance of the functions of
the Agency, particularly its enforcement function. The information
collected has practical utility. For example, neither EPA nor a
reconditioner can determine whether a used converter is effective by
conducting a visual inspection of the converter. As another example,
the efficacy of new aftermarket converters for particular vehicle
applications cannot be determined without prototype testing and
information on specifications.
    Burden Statement: The annual public reporting and recordkeeping
burden for this collection of information is estimated to average 7
hours per response. Burden means the total time, effort, or financial
resources expended by persons to generate, maintain, retain, or
disclose or provide information to or for a Federal agency. This
includes the time needed to review instructions; develop, acquire,
install, and utilize technology and systems for the purposes of
collecting, validating, and verifying information, processing and
maintaining information, and disclosing and providing information;
adjust the existing ways to comply with any previously applicable
instructions and requirements which have subsequently changed; train
personnel to be able to respond to a collection of information; search
data sources; complete and review the collection of information; and
transmit or otherwise disclose the information.
    Respondents/Affected Entities: Manufacturers, Reconditioners, and
Installers of Aftermarket Catalytic Converters.
    Estimated Number of Respondents: 30,014.
    Frequency of Response: On Occasion.
    Estimated Total Annual Hour Burden: 220,928.
    Estimated Total Annual Cost: $7,457,469, includes $740,786
annualized capital or O&M costs.
    Changes in the Estimates: There is an increase of 8,827 hours in
the total estimated burden currently identified in the OMB Inventory of
Approved ICR Burdens. This increase is due to increased volume of cars
and the corresponding increase in the number of installations of
aftermarket catalysts. Thus, the increase reflects an adjustment in ICR
estimates and not a change to program requirements.

    Dated: December 17, 2008.
John Moses,
Acting Director, Collection Strategies Division.
 [FR Doc. E8-30543 Filed 12-22-08; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 6560-50-P


[Federal Register Volume 78, Number 125 (Friday, June 28, 2013)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Pages 38835-38837]
[FR Doc No: 2013-15595]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY

Coast Guard

33 CFR Part 165

[Docket No. USCG-2013-0355]
RIN 1625-AA00

Safety Zone: City of Vallejo Fourth of July Fireworks Display,
Mare Island Strait, Vallejo, CA

AGENCY: Coast Guard, DHS.

ACTION: Temporary final rule.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Coast Guard is establishing a temporary safety zone in the
navigable waters of Mare Island Strait near Vallejo, CA in support of
the City of Vallejo Fourth of July Fireworks Display on July 4, 2013.
This safety zone is established to ensure the safety of participants
and spectators from the dangers associated with the pyrotechnics.
Unauthorized persons or vessels are prohibited from entering into,
transiting through, or remaining in the safety zone without permission
of the Captain of the Port or their designated representative.

DATES: This rule is effective on July 4, 2013, from 9:30 p.m. until 10
p.m.

ADDRESSES: Documents mentioned in this preamble are part of docket
USCG-2013-0355. To view documents mentioned in this preamble as being
available in the docket, go to http://www.regulations.gov, type the
docket number in the ``SEARCH'' box and click ``SEARCH.'' Click on Open
Docket Folder on the line associated with this rulemaking. You may also
visit the Docket Management Facility in Room W12-140 on the ground
floor of the Department of Transportation West Building, 1200 New
Jersey Avenue SE., Washington, DC 20590, between 9 a.m. and 5 p.m.,
Monday through Friday, except Federal holidays.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: If you have questions on this rule,
call or email Lieutenant Junior Grade William Hawn, U.S. Coast Guard
Sector San Francisco; telephone<PHONE_NUMBER> or email at<EMAIL_ADDRESS>If you have questions on viewing or submitting
material to the docket, call Program Manager, Docket Operations,
telephone<PHONE_NUMBER>.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

Table of Acronyms

DHS Department of Homeland Security
FR Federal Register
NPRM Notice of Proposed Rulemaking

A. Regulatory History and Information

    The Coast Guard is issuing this temporary final rule without prior
notice and opportunity to comment pursuant to authority under section
4(a) of the Administrative Procedure Act (APA) (5 U.S.C. 553(b)). This
provision authorizes an agency to issue a rule without prior notice and
opportunity to comment when the agency for good cause finds that those
procedures are ``impracticable, unnecessary, or contrary to the public
interest.'' It would be impracticable to issue a notice of proposed
rulemaking because the Coast Guard received the information about the
fireworks display on May 2, 2013, and the fireworks display would occur
before the rulemaking process would be completed.
    Under 5 U.S.C. 553(d)(3), the Coast Guard finds that good cause
exists for making this rule effective less than 30 days after
publication in the Federal Register. Because of the dangers posed by
the pyrotechnics used in this fireworks display, the safety zone is
necessary to provide for the safety of event participants, spectators,
spectator craft, and other vessels transiting the event area. For the
safety concerns noted, it is in the public interest to have these
regulations in effect during the event.

B. Basis and Purpose

    The legal basis for the proposed rule is 33 U.S.C. 1231; 46 U.S.C.
Chapter 701, 3306, 3703; 50 U.S.C. 191, 195; 33 CFR 1.05-1, 6.04-1,
6.04-6, 160.5; Public Law 107-295, 116 Stat. 2064; Department of
Homeland Security Delegation No. 0170.1, which collectively authorize
the Coast Guard to establish safety zones.
    The City of Vallejo will sponsor the City of Vallejo Fourth of July
Fireworks Display on July 4, 2013, on Mare Island

near Vallejo, CA in approximate position 38[deg]06'04'' N,
122[deg]16'10'' W (NAD 83) as depicted in National Oceanic and
Atmospheric Administration (NOAA) Chart 18655. Upon the commencement of
the fireworks display, the safety zone will encompass the navigable
waters around the launch site within a radius of 420 feet. The
fireworks display is meant for entertainment purposes. This restricted
area around the launch site is necessary to protect spectators,
vessels, and other property from the hazards associated with the
pyrotechnics.

C. Discussion of the Final Rule

    The Coast Guard will enforce a safety zone in navigable waters
around the land based launch site on Mare Island near Vallejo, CA. Upon
the commencement of the 20 minute fireworks display, scheduled to begin
at 9:30 p.m. on July 4, 2013, the safety zone will encompass the
navigable waters around the fireworks launch site within a radius 420
feet from position 38[deg]06'04'' N, 122[deg]16'10'' W (NAD 83) for the
City of Vallejo Fourth of July Fireworks Display. At the conclusion of
the fireworks display the safety zone shall terminate.
    The effect of the temporary safety zone will be to restrict
navigation in the vicinity of the launch site until the conclusion of
the scheduled display. Except for persons or vessels authorized by the
Coast Guard Patrol Commander, no person or vessel may enter or remain
in the restricted area. These regulations are needed to keep spectators
and vessels away from the immediate vicinity of the launch site to
ensure the safety of participants, spectators, and transiting vessels.

D. Regulatory Analyses

    We developed this rule after considering numerous statutes and
executive orders related to rulemaking. Below we summarize our analyses
based on 13 of these statutes and executive orders.

1. Regulatory Planning and Review

    This rule is not a significant regulatory action under section 3(f)
of Executive Order 12866, Regulatory Planning and Review, as
supplemented by Executive Order 13563, Improving Regulation and
Regulatory Review, and does not require an assessment of potential
costs and benefits under section 6(a)(3) of Executive Order 12866 or
under section 1 of Executive Order 13563. The Office of Management and
Budget has not reviewed it under those Orders.
    We expect the economic impact of this rule does not rise to the
level of necessitating a full Regulatory Evaluation. The safety zone is
limited in duration, and is limited to a narrowly tailored geographic
area. In addition, although this rule restricts access to the waters
encompassed by the safety zone, the effect of this rule will not be
significant because the local waterway users will be notified via
public Broadcast Notice to Mariners to ensure the safety zone will
result in minimum impact. The entities most likely to be affected are
waterfront facilities, commercial vessels, and pleasure craft engaged
in recreational activities.

2. Impact on Small Entities

    The Regulatory Flexibility Act of 1980 (RFA), 5 U.S.C. 601-612, as
amended, requires federal agencies to consider the potential impact of
regulations on small entities during rulemaking. The Coast Guard
certifies under 5 U.S.C. 605(b) that this rule will not have a
significant economic impact on a substantial number of small entities.
    This rule may affect owners and operators of waterfront facilities,
commercial vessels, and pleasure craft engaged in recreational
activities and sightseeing. This safety zone would not have a
significant economic impact on a substantial number of small entities
for the following reasons. This safety zone would be activated, and
thus subject to enforcement, for a limited duration. When the safety
zone is activated, vessel traffic could pass safely around the safety
zone. The maritime public will be advised in advance of this safety
zone via Broadcast Notice to Mariners.

3. Assistance for Small Entities

    Under section 213(a) of the Small Business Regulatory Enforcement
Fairness Act of 1996 (Pub. L. 104-121), we want to assist small
entities in understanding this rule. If the rule would affect your
small business, organization, or governmental jurisdiction and you have
questions concerning its provisions or options for compliance, please
contact the person listed in the FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT,
above.
    Small businesses may send comments on the actions of Federal
employees who enforce, or otherwise determine compliance with, Federal
regulations to the Small Business and Agriculture Regulatory
Enforcement Ombudsman and the Regional Small Business Regulatory
Fairness Boards. The Ombudsman evaluates these actions annually and
rates each agency's responsiveness to small business. If you wish to
comment on actions by employees of the Coast Guard, call 1-888-REG-FAIR
(1-888-734-3247). The Coast Guard will not retaliate against small
entities that question or complain about this rule or any policy or
action of the Coast Guard.

4. Collection of Information

    This rule will not call for a new collection of information under
the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 (44 U.S.C. 3501-3520).

5. Federalism

    A rule has implications for federalism under Executive Order 13132,
Federalism, if it has a substantial direct effect on the States, on the
relationship between the national government and the States, or on the
distribution of power and responsibilities among the various levels of
government. We have analyzed this rule under that Order and determined
that this rule does not have implications for federalism.

6. Protest Activities

    The Coast Guard respects the First Amendment rights of protesters.
Protesters are asked to contact the person listed in the FOR FURTHER
INFORMATION CONTACT section to coordinate protest activities so that
your message can be received without jeopardizing the safety or
security of people, places or vessels.

7. Unfunded Mandates Reform Act

    The Unfunded Mandates Reform Act of 1995 (2 U.S.C. 1531-1538)
requires Federal agencies to assess the effects of their discretionary
regulatory actions. In particular, the Act addresses actions that may
result in the expenditure by a State, local, or tribal government, in
the aggregate, or by the private sector of $100,000,000 (adjusted for
inflation) or more in any one year. Though this rule will not result in
such an expenditure, we do discuss the effects of this rule elsewhere
in this preamble.

8. Taking of Private Property

    This rule will not cause a taking of private property or otherwise
have taking implications under Executive Order 12630, Governmental
Actions and Interference with Constitutionally Protected Property
Rights.

9. Civil Justice Reform

    This rule meets applicable standards in sections 3(a) and 3(b)(2)
of Executive Order 12988, Civil Justice Reform, to minimize litigation,
eliminate ambiguity, and reduce burden.

10. Protection of Children

    We have analyzed this rule under Executive Order 13045, Protection
of Children from Environmental Health Risks and Safety Risks. This rule
is not an economically significant rule and does not create an
environmental risk to health or risk to safety that may
disproportionately affect children.

11. Indian Tribal Governments

    This rule does not have tribal implications under Executive Order
13175, Consultation and Coordination with Indian Tribal Governments,
because it does not have a substantial direct effect on one or more
Indian tribes, on the relationship between the Federal Government and
Indian tribes, or on the distribution of power and responsibilities
between the Federal Government and Indian tribes.

12. Energy Effects

    This action is not a ``significant energy action'' under Executive
Order 13211, Actions Concerning Regulations That Significantly Affect
Energy Supply, Distribution, or Use.

13. Technical Standards

    This rule does not use technical standards. Therefore, we did not
consider the use of voluntary consensus standards.

14. Environment

    We have analyzed this rule under Department of Homeland Security
Management Directive 023-01 and Commandant Instruction M16475.lD, which
guide the Coast Guard in complying with the National Environmental
Policy Act of 1969 (NEPA) (42 U.S.C. 4321-4370f), and have determined
that this action is one of a category of actions that do not
individually or cumulatively have a significant effect on the human
environment. This rule involves a safety zone of limited size and
duration. This rule is categorically excluded from further review under
paragraph 34(g) and 35(b) of Figure 2-1 of the Commandant Instruction.
An environmental analysis checklist supporting this determination and a
Categorical Exclusion Determination are available in the docket where
indicated under ADDRESSES. We seek any comments or information that may
lead to the discovery of a significant environmental impact from this
rule.

List of Subjects in 33 CFR Part 165

    Harbors, Marine safety, Navigation (water), Reporting and
recordkeeping requirements, Security measures, and Waterways.

    For the reasons discussed in the preamble, the Coast Guard amends
33 CFR part 165 as follows:

PART 165--REGULATED NAVIGATION AREAS AND LIMITED ACCESS AREAS

0
1. The authority citation for part 165 continues to read as follows:

    Authority:  33 U.S.C. 1226, 1231; 46 U.S.C. Chapter 701; 50
U.S.C. 191, 195; 33 CFR 1.05-1(g), 6.04-1, 6.04-6, and 160.5; Pub.
L. 107-295, 116 Stat. 2064; Department of Homeland Security
Delegation No. 0170.1.

0
2. Add Sec.  165.T11-572 to read as follows:

Sec.  165.T11-572  Safety zone; City of Vallejo Fourth of July
Fireworks Display, Mare Island Strait, Vallejo, CA.

    (a) Location. This temporary safety zone is established for the
navigable waters of Mare Island Strait near Vallejo, CA as depicted in
National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA) Chart 18655. The
temporary safety zone will encompass the navigable waters around the
fireworks launch site in approximate position 38[deg]06'04'' N,
122[deg]16'10'' W (NAD 83) within a radius of 420 feet.
    (b) Enforcement period. The zone described in paragraph (a) of this
section will be enforced from 9:30 p.m. through 10 p.m. on July 4,
2013. The Captain of the Port San Francisco (COTP) will notify the
maritime community of periods during which this zone will be enforced
via Broadcast Notice to Mariners in accordance with 33 CFR 165.7.
    (c) Definitions. As used in this section, ``designated
representative'' means a Coast Guard Patrol Commander, including a
Coast Guard coxswain, petty officer, or other officer on a Coast Guard
vessel or a Federal, State, or local officer designated by or assisting
the COTP in the enforcement of the safety zone.
    (d) Regulations. (1) Under the general regulations in 33 CFR part
165, subpart C, entry into, transiting or anchoring within this safety
zone is prohibited unless authorized by the COTP or a designated
representative.
    (2) The safety zone is closed to all vessel traffic, except as may
be permitted by the COTP or a designated representative.
    (3) Vessel operators desiring to enter or operate within the safety
zone must contact the COTP or a designated representative to obtain
permission to do so. Vessel operators given permission to enter or
operate in the safety zone must comply with all directions given to
them by the COTP or a designated representative. Persons and vessels
may request permission to enter the safety zone on VHF-23A or through
the 24-hour Command Center at telephone<PHONE_NUMBER>.

    Dated: June 13, 2013.
Gregory G. Stump,
Captain, U.S. Coast Guard, Captain of the Port San Francisco.
[FR Doc. 2013-15595 Filed 6-27-13; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 9110-04-P


Event Form ( Instrument # 30)

NCS Herald Cohort Study Instrument # 30 Event Form Eligibility: All women and study child Mode of administration: Self Administered 8/ 4/ 2005 Public reporting burden for this collection of information is estimated to average 5 minutes per response, including the time for reviewing instructions, searching existing data sources, gathering and maintaining the data needed, and completing and reviewing the collection of information. An agency may not conduct or sponsor, and a person is not required to respond to, a collection of information unless it displays a currently valid OMB control number. Send comments regarding this burden estimate or any other aspect of this collection of information, including suggestions for reducing this burden, to: Dr. Pauline Mendola, US EPA, MD 58A, Research Triangle Park, NC 27711. E mail: mendola. pauline@ epa. gov. Event Form ( Instrument # 30)

North Carolina Herald Cohort Event Form For Mothers and their Child I D# ___________________________

Please use this form to document any illnesses, non routine visits to the doctor, emergency room visits, hospital admissions or illnesses for yourself or your child in the study.

When complete, please return this form in the provided postage paid envelopes. If you have any questions on what to include, please contact the study coordinator, XXXXXX at 1 800 334 8531 ext. XXXX.

Thank you 1) Who experienced the event? 1 Mother 2 Child 2) Event Type: ( PLEASE CIRCLE ALL EVENTS THAT APPLY)

a) Non Routine doctor visit. Date of Visit __/__/__ ( PLEASE DESCRIBE REASON FOR VISIT)_____________________________________________

b) Emergency Room Visit Date of Visit __/__/__ ( PLEASE DESCRIBE REASON FOR EMERGENCY ROOM VISIT)

__________________________________________________________________

c) Hospital Admission Date of Admission __/__/__ Date of Discharge __/__/__

( PLEASE DESCRIBE REASON FOR HOSPITAL ADMISSION)

___________________________________________________________________

d) Significant Illness that did not result in medical attention: Date of illness __/__/__

( PLEASE DESCRIBE THE ILLNESS) _______________________________________

e) Other medical event Date of event: __/__/__ ( PLEASE DESCRIBE THE MEDICAL EVENT)_____________________________________________________________


[Federal Register Volume 88, Number 171 (Wednesday, September 6, 2023)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Pages 60886-60887]
[FR Doc No: 2023-19095]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION

Federal Aviation Administration

14 CFR Part 71

[Docket No. FAA-2022-0216; Airspace Docket No. 19-AAL-63]
RIN 2120-AA66

Amendment of United States Area Navigation (RNAV) Route T-230;
St. Paul Island, AK

AGENCY: Federal Aviation Administration (FAA), DOT.

ACTION: Final rule; correction.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: This action corrects a final rule published by the FAA in the
Federal Register on July 17, 2023, that amends United States Area
Navigation (RNAV) route T-230 in the vicinity of St. Paul Island, AK,
in support of a large and comprehensive T-route modernization project
for the state of Alaska. The final rule identified the GARRS, AK, route
point as a waypoint (WP), in error. This action makes an editorial
correction to the reference of the GARRS, AK, WP to change it to be
reflected as a Fix and match the FAA's National Airspace System
Resource (NASR) database information.

DATES: Effective date 0901 UTC, October 5, 2023. The Director of the
Federal Register approves this incorporation by reference action under
1 CFR part 51, subject to the annual revision of FAA Order JO 7400.11
and publication of conforming amendments.

ADDRESSES: FAA Order JO 7400.11G, Airspace Designations and Reporting
Points, and subsequent amendments can be viewed online at https://www.faa.gov/air_traffic/publications/. For further information, you can
contact the Rules and Regulations Group, Federal Aviation
Administration, 800 Independence Avenue SW, Washington, DC 20591;
telephone:<PHONE_NUMBER>.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Steven Roff, Rules and Regulations
Group, Office of Policy, Federal Aviation Administration, 800
Independence Avenue SW, Washington, DC 20591; telephone: (202) 267-
8783.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

History

    The FAA published a final rule in the Federal Register (88 FR
45329; July 17, 2023), amending T-230 in support of a large and
comprehensive T-route modernization project for the state of Alaska.
Subsequent to publication of the final rule, the FAA determined that
the GARRS, AK, route point was inadvertently identified as a WP, in

error. This rule corrects that error by changing the reference of the
GARRS, AK, WP to the GARRS, AK, Fix. This is an editorial change only
to match the FAA's NASR database information and does not alter the
alignment of the affected T-230 route.

Correction to Final Rule

    Accordingly, pursuant to the authority delegated to me, reference
to the GARRS, AK, WP that is reflected in Docket No. FAA-2022-0216, as
published in the Federal Register of July 17, 2023 (88 FR 45329), FR
Doc. 2023-15011, is corrected as follows:

0
1. In FR Doc. 2023-15011, appearing on page 45330 correct the table for
T-230 St. Paul Island, AK (SPY) to King Salmon, AK (AKN) to read:

T-230 St. Paul Island, AK (SPY) to King Salmon, AK (AKN) [Amended]

St. Paul Island, AK (SPY)                       NDB/DME                        (Lat. 57[deg]09'25.20'' N, long. 170[deg]13'58.77'' W)
GARRS, AK                                       Fix                            (Lat. 58[deg]19'05.80'' N, long. 161[deg]20'31.74'' W)
Salmon, AK (AKN)                                VORTAC                         (Lat. 58[deg]43'28.97'' N, long. 156[deg]45'08.45'' W)

* * * * *

    Issued in Washington, DC, on August 30, 2023.
Karen Chiodini,
Acting Manager, Airspace Rules and Regulations.
[FR Doc. 2023-19095 Filed 9-5-23; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910-13-P