[Federal Register: March 1, 2007 (Volume 72, Number 40)]
[Notices]
[Page 9321]
[DOCID:fr01mr07-46]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission

 [Docket No. AC07-64-000]

Energy West Development, Inc.; Notice of Filing

February 23, 2007.
    Take notice that on February 14, 2007, Energy West Development
Inc., submitted a request for a waiver of its requirement to submit a
report of certification (CPA Certification Statement) of its 2005 FERC
Form No. 2-A. The CPA Certification statement is required under section
158.11 of the Commission's regulations.
    Any person desiring to intervene or to protest this filing must
file in accordance with Rules 211 and 214 of the Commission's Rules of
Practice and Procedure (18 CFR 385.211 or 385.214). Protests will be
considered by the Commission in determining the appropriate action to
be taken, but will not serve to make protestants parties to the
proceeding. Any person wishing to become a party must file a notice of
intervention or motion to intervene, as appropriate. Such notices,
motions, or protests must be filed on or before the comment date. On or
before the comment date, it is not necessary to serve motions to
intervene or protests on persons other than the Applicant.
    The Commission encourages electronic submission of protests and
interventions in lieu of paper using the ``eFiling'' link at http://www.ferc.gov.
 Persons unable to file electronically should submit an

original and 14 copies of the protest or intervention to the Federal
Energy Regulatory Commission, 888 First Street, NE., Washington, DC
20426.
    This filing is accessible on-line at http://www.ferc.gov, using the

``eLibrary'' link and is available for review in the Commission's
Public Reference Room in Washington, DC. There is an ``eSubscription''
link on the Web site that enables subscribers to receive e-mail
notification when a document is added to a subscribed docket(s). For
assistance with any FERC Online service, please e-mail
<EMAIL_ADDRESS>or call<PHONE_NUMBER> (toll free). For

TTY, call<PHONE_NUMBER>.
    Comment Date: March 16, 2007.

Magalie R. Salas,
Secretary.
 [FR Doc. E7-3608 Filed 2-28-07; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 6717-01-P


[Federal Register Volume 81, Number 64 (Monday, April 4, 2016)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Pages 19024-19025]
[FR Doc No: 2016-07376]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION

Federal Aviation Administration

14 CFR Part 39

[Docket No. FAA-2015-5193; Directorate Identifier 2015-NE-35-AD;
Amendment 39-18464; AD 2016-07-19]
RIN 2120-AA64

Airworthiness Directives; Technify Motors GmbH Reciprocating
Engines

AGENCY: Federal Aviation Administration (FAA), DOT.

ACTION: Final rule.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: We are adopting a new airworthiness directive (AD) for certain
Technify Motors GmbH (type certificate previously held by Thielert
Aircraft Engines GmbH) TAE 125-02-99 and TAE 125-02-114 reciprocating
engines. This AD requires removal of affected fuel feed pumps. This AD
was prompted by reports of in-flight shutdowns on TAE 125-02 engines.
We are issuing this AD to prevent failure of the fuel feed pump, damage
to the engine, and damage to the airplane.

DATES: This AD becomes effective May 9, 2016.

ADDRESSES: For service information identified in this AD, contact
Technify Motors GmbH, Platanenstrasse 14, D-09356 Sankt Egidien,
Germany; phone: +49-37204-696-0; fax: +49-37204-696-2912; email:
<EMAIL_ADDRESS>You may view this service information at
the FAA, Engine & Propeller Directorate, 1200 District Avenue,
Burlington, MA. For information on the availability of this material at
the FAA, call<PHONE_NUMBER>. It is also available on the Internet at
http://www.regulations.gov by searching for and locating Docket No.
FAA-2015-5193.

Examining the AD Docket

    You may examine the AD docket on the Internet at http://www.regulations.gov by searching for and locating Docket No. FAA-2015-
5193; or in person at the Docket Management Facility between 9 a.m. and
5 p.m., Monday through Friday, except Federal holidays. The AD docket
contains this AD, the mandatory continuing airworthiness information
(MCAI), the regulatory evaluation, any comments received, and other
information. The address for the Docket Office (phone:<PHONE_NUMBER>) is
Document Management Facility, U.S. Department of Transportation, Docket
Operations, M-30, West Building Ground Floor, Room W12-140, 1200 New
Jersey Avenue SE., Washington, DC 20590.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Philip Haberlen, Aerospace Engineer,
Engine Certification Office, FAA, Engine & Propeller Directorate, 1200
District Avenue, Burlington, MA 01803; phone:<PHONE_NUMBER>; fax: 781-
238-7199; email<EMAIL_ADDRESS>
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

Discussion

    We issued a notice of proposed rulemaking (NPRM) to amend 14 CFR
part 39 by adding an AD that would apply to the specified products. The
NPRM was published in the Federal Register on January 4, 2016 (81 FR
27). The NPRM proposed to correct an unsafe condition for the specified
products. The MCAI states:

In-flight shut down occurrences have been reported on aeroplanes
equipped with TAE 125-02 engines. The initial results of the

investigations showed that a defective fuel feed pump was the
probable cause of the engine failure.

    You may obtain further information by examining the MCAI in the AD
docket on the Internet at http://www.regulations.gov by searching for
and locating Docket No. FAA-2015-5193.

Comments

    We gave the public the opportunity to participate in developing
this AD. We received no comments on the NPRM (81 FR 27, January 4,
2016).

Conclusion

    We reviewed the available data and determined that air safety and
the public interest require adopting this AD as proposed.

Related Service Information

    Technify Motors GmbH has issued Operation & Maintenance Manual, CD-
135/CD-155, OM-02-02, Issue 4, Revision No. 5, dated September 18,
2015. The service information describes procedures for removing and
replacing the fuel feed pump.

Costs of Compliance

    We estimate that this AD affects 190 engines installed on airplanes
of U.S. registry. We also estimate that it will take about 0.5 hours
per engine to comply with this AD. The average labor rate is $85 per
hour. Pro-rated cost of the life limit reduction is about $160 per
part. Based on these figures, we estimate the cost of this AD on U.S.
operators to be $38,475.

Authority for This Rulemaking

    Title 49 of the United States Code specifies the FAA's authority to
issue rules on aviation safety. Subtitle I, section 106, describes the
authority of the FAA Administrator. ``Subtitle VII: Aviation
Programs,'' describes in more detail the scope of the Agency's
authority.
    We are issuing this rulemaking under the authority described in
``Subtitle VII, Part A, Subpart III, Section 44701: General
requirements.'' Under that section, Congress charges the FAA with
promoting safe flight of civil aircraft in air commerce by prescribing
regulations for practices, methods, and procedures the Administrator
finds necessary for safety in air commerce. This regulation is within
the scope of that authority because it addresses an unsafe condition
that is likely to exist or develop on products identified in this
rulemaking action.

Regulatory Findings

    We determined that this AD will not have federalism implications
under Executive Order 13132. This AD will not have a substantial direct
effect on the States, on the relationship between the national
government and the States, or on the distribution of power and
responsibilities among the various levels of government.
    For the reasons discussed above, I certify this AD:
    (1) Is not a ``significant regulatory action'' under Executive
Order 12866,
    (2) Is not a ``significant rule'' under the DOT Regulatory Policies
and Procedures (44 FR 11034, February 26, 1979),
    (3) Will not affect intrastate aviation in Alaska to the extent
that it justifies making a regulatory distinction, and
    (4) Will not have a significant economic impact, positive or
negative, on a substantial number of small entities under the criteria
of the Regulatory Flexibility Act.

List of Subjects in 14 CFR Part 39

    Air transportation, Aircraft, Aviation safety, Incorporation by
reference, Safety.

Adoption of the Amendment

    Accordingly, under the authority delegated to me by the
Administrator, the FAA amends 14 CFR part 39 as follows:

PART 39--AIRWORTHINESS DIRECTIVES

0
1. The authority citation for part 39 continues to read as follows:

    Authority:  49 U.S.C. 106(g), 40113, 44701.

Sec.  39.13  [Amended]

0
2. The FAA amends Sec.  39.13 by adding the following new airworthiness
directive (AD):

2016-07-19 Technify Motors GmbH (Type Certificate previously held by
Thielert Aircraft Engines GmbH): Amendment 39-18464; Docket No. FAA-
2015-5193; Directorate Identifier 2015-NE-35-AD.

(a) Effective Date

    This AD becomes effective May 9, 2016.

(b) Affected ADs

    None.

(c) Applicability

    This AD applies to all Technify Motors GmbH TAE 125-02-99 and
TAE 125-02-114 reciprocating engines with a fuel feed pump, part
number (P/N) 05-7312-K0073xx, or P/N 05-7312-K0133xx, where ``xx''
can be any number, installed.

(d) Reason

    This AD was prompted by reports of in-flight shutdowns on TAE
125-02 engines. We are issuing this AD to prevent failure of the
fuel feed pump, damage to the engine, and damage to the airplane.

(e) Actions and Compliance

    Comply with this AD within the compliance times specified,
unless already done. Remove from service each affected fuel feed
pump before it exceeds 600 operating hours (OH) time in service
(TIS) or within 110 OH after the effective date of this AD,
whichever occurs later.

(f) Installation Prohibition

    After the effective date of this AD, do not install onto any
engine, any fuel feed pump, P/N 05-7312-K0073xx or P/N 05-7312-
K0133xx, where ``xx'' can be any number, if the fuel feed pump has
600 hours or more TIS. If TIS of a fuel feed pump is unknown or has
exceeded 600 hours TIS, then the fuel feed pump is not eligible for
installation. Rebuilt, overhauled, or repaired fuel feed pumps or
fuel feed pumps that lack a serial number, are not eligible for
installation.

(g) Related Information

    (1) For more information about this AD, Philip Haberlen,
Aerospace Engineer, Engine Certification Office, FAA, Engine &
Propeller Directorate, 1200 District Avenue, Burlington, MA 01803;
phone:<PHONE_NUMBER>; fax:<PHONE_NUMBER>; email:
<EMAIL_ADDRESS>    (2) Refer to MCAI European Aviation Safety Agency AD 2015-0189,
dated September 21, 2015, for more information. You may examine the
MCAI in the AD docket on the Internet at http://www.regulations.gov
by searching for and locating it in Docket No. FAA-2015-5193.
    (3) For service information identified in this AD, contact
Technify Motors GmbH, Platanenstrasse 14, D-09356 Sankt Egidien,
Germany; phone: +49-37204-696-0; fax: +49-37204-696-2912; email:
<EMAIL_ADDRESS>    (4) You may view this service information at the FAA, Engine &
Propeller Directorate, 1200 District Avenue, Burlington, MA. For
information on the availability of this material at the FAA, call
781-238-7125.

(h) Material Incorporated by Reference

    None.

    Issued in Burlington, Massachusetts, on March 25, 2016.
Colleen M. D'Alessandro,
Manager, Engine & Propeller Directorate, Aircraft Certification
Service.
[FR Doc. 2016-07376 Filed 4-1-16; 8:45 am]
 BILLING CODE 4910-13-P


[Federal Register Volume 88, Number 92 (Friday, May 12, 2023)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Pages 30648-30650]
[FR Doc No: 2023-10149]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY

Coast Guard

33 CFR Part 165

[Docket Number USCG-2023-0377]
RIN 1625-AA00

Safety Zone; Roostertail Fireworks, Detroit River, Detroit, MI

AGENCY: Coast Guard, DHS.

ACTION: Temporary final rule.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Coast Guard is establishing a temporary safety zone for
navigable waters in the Detroit River in Detroit, MI. The safety zone
is necessary and intended to protect personnel, vessels, and the marine
environment from potential hazards associated with fireworks displays
created by the Binienda and Steel wedding. Entry of vessels or persons
into this zone is prohibited unless specifically authorized by the
Captain of the Port Detroit, or his designated representative.

DATES: This rule is effective from 9 p.m. through 10:30 p.m. on May 20,
2023.

ADDRESSES: To view documents mentioned in this preamble as being
available in the docket, go to https://www.regulations.gov, type USCG-
2023-0377 in the ``SEARCH'' box and click ``SEARCH.'' Click on Open
Docket Folder on the line associated with this rule.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: If you have questions on this rule,
call or email Tracy Girard, Waterways Department, Sector Detroit, Coast
Guard; telephone<PHONE_NUMBER>, email [email protected].

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

I. Table of Abbreviations

CFR Code of Federal Regulations
DHS Department of Homeland Security
FR Federal Register
NPRM Notice of proposed rulemaking
Sec.  Section
U.S.C. United States Code

II. Background Information and Regulatory History

    The Coast Guard is issuing this temporary rule without prior notice
and opportunity to comment pursuant to authority under section 4(a) of
the Administrative Procedure Act (APA) (5 U.S.C. 553(b)). This
provision authorizes an agency to issue a rule without prior notice and
opportunity to comment when the agency for good cause finds that those
procedures are ``impracticable, unnecessary, or contrary to the public
interest.'' Under 5 U.S.C. 553(b)(B), the Coast Guard finds that good
cause exists for not publishing a notice of proposed rulemaking (NPRM)
with respect to this rule because the event sponsor notified the Coast
Guard with insufficient time to publish an NPRM and immediate action is
necessary to protect personnel, vessels, and the marine environment in
the Detroit River. It is impracticable and contrary to the public
interest to publish a NPRM because we must establish this safety zone
by May 20, 2023.
    Under 5 U.S.C. 553(d)(3), the Coast Guard finds that good cause
exists for making this rule effective less than 30 days after
publication in the Federal Register. For the same reasons discussed in
the preceding paragraph, delaying the effective date of this rule would
be impracticable because immediate action is needed to respond to the
potential safety hazards associated with a fireworks display.

III. Legal Authority and Need for Rule

    The Coast Guard is issuing this rule under authority in 46 U.S.C.
70034 (previously 33 U.S.C. 1231). The Captain of the Port Detroit
(COTP) has determined that potential hazards associated with fireworks
displays will be a safety concern for anyone within a 200-yard radius
of the launch site. The likely combination of recreational vessels,
darkness punctuated by bright flashes of light, and fireworks debris
falling into the water presents risks of collisions which could result
in serious injuries or fatalities. This rule is necessary to protect
personnel, vessels, and the marine environment in the navigable waters
within the safety zone during the fireworks display.

IV. Discussion of the Rule

    This rule establishes a safety zone from 9 p.m. through 10:30 p.m.
on May 20, 2023. The safety zone will encompass all U.S. navigable
waters of the Detroit River within a 200-yard radius of the fireworks
launch site located near the public launch site, in Detroit, MI. The
duration of the zone is intended to protect personnel, vessels, and the
marine environment in these navigable waters during the fireworks
display. Entry into, transiting, or anchoring within the safety zone is
prohibited unless authorized by the Captain of the Port Detroit or his
designated representative. The Captain of the Port Detroit or his
designated representative may be contacted via VHF Channel 16.

V. Regulatory Analyses

    We developed this rule after considering numerous statutes and
Executive orders related to rulemaking. Below we summarize our analyses
based on a number of these statutes and Executive orders, and we
discuss First Amendment rights of protestors.

A. Regulatory Planning and Review

    Executive Orders 12866 and 13563 direct agencies to assess the
costs and benefits of available regulatory alternatives and, if
regulation is necessary, to select regulatory approaches that maximize
net benefits. This rule has not been designated a ``significant
regulatory action,'' under Executive Order 12866. Accordingly, this
rule has not been reviewed by the Office of Management and Budget
(OMB).
    This regulatory action determination is based on the size,
location, and duration of the safety zone. Vessel traffic will be able
to safely transit around this safety zone which would impact a small,
designated area of the Detroit River one hours during the evening when
vessel traffic is normally low. Moreover, the Coast Guard would issue a
Broadcast Notice to Mariners via VHF-FM Marine Channel 16 about the
zone, and the rule would allow vessels to seek permission to enter the
zone.

B. Impact on Small Entities

    The Regulatory Flexibility Act of 1980, 5 U.S.C. 601-612, as
amended, requires Federal agencies to consider the potential impact of
regulations on small entities during rulemaking. The term ``small
entities'' comprises small businesses, not-for-profit organizations
that are independently owned and operated and are not dominant in their
fields, and governmental jurisdictions with populations of less than
50,000. The Coast Guard certifies under 5 U.S.C. 605(b) that this rule
will not have a significant economic impact on a substantial number of
small entities.
    While some owners or operators of vessels intending to transit the
safety zone may be small entities, for the reasons stated in section
V.A above, this rule will not have a significant economic impact on any
vessel owner or operator.
    Under section 213(a) of the Small Business Regulatory Enforcement
Fairness Act of 1996 (Pub. L. 104-121), we want to assist small
entities in understanding this rule. If the rule would affect your
small business, organization, or governmental jurisdiction and you have
questions concerning its provisions or options for compliance, please
call or email the person listed in the FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT
section.
    Small businesses may send comments on the actions of Federal
employees who enforce, or otherwise determine compliance with, Federal
regulations to the Small Business and Agriculture Regulatory
Enforcement Ombudsman and the Regional Small Business Regulatory
Fairness Boards. The Ombudsman evaluates these actions annually and
rates each agency's responsiveness to small business. If you wish to
comment on actions by employees of the Coast Guard, call 1-888-REG-FAIR
(1-888-734-3247). The Coast Guard will not retaliate against small
entities that question or complain about this rule or any policy or
action of the Coast Guard.

C. Collection of Information

    This rule will not call for a new collection of information under
the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 (44 U.S.C. 3501-3520).

D. Federalism and Indian Tribal Governments

    A rule has implications for federalism under Executive Order 13132,
Federalism, if it has a substantial direct effect on the States, on the
relationship between the National Government and the States, or on the
distribution of power and responsibilities among the various levels of
government. We have analyzed this rule under that Order and have
determined that it is consistent with the fundamental federalism
principles and preemption requirements described in Executive Order
13132.
    Also, this rule does not have tribal implications under Executive
Order 13175, Consultation and Coordination with Indian Tribal
Governments, because it does not have a substantial direct effect on
one or more Indian tribes, on the relationship between the Federal
Government and Indian tribes, or on the distribution of power and
responsibilities between the Federal Government and Indian tribes. If
you believe this rule has implications for federalism or Indian tribes,
please contact the person listed in the FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT
section above.

E. Unfunded Mandates Reform Act

    The Unfunded Mandates Reform Act of 1995 (2 U.S.C. 1531-1538)
requires Federal agencies to assess the effects of their discretionary
regulatory actions. In particular, the Act addresses actions that may
result in the expenditure by a State, local, or tribal government, in
the aggregate, or by the private sector of $100,000,000 (adjusted for
inflation) or more in any one year. Though this rule will not result in
such an expenditure, we do discuss the effects of this rule elsewhere
in this preamble.

F. Environment

    We have analyzed this rule under Department of Homeland Security
Directive 023-01, Rev. 1, associated implementing instructions, and
Environmental Planning COMDTINST 5090.1 (series), which guide the Coast
Guard in complying with the National Environmental Policy Act of 1969
(42 U.S.C. 4321-4370f), and have determined that this action is one of
a category of actions that do not individually or cumulatively have a
significant effect on the human environment. This rule involves a
safety zone lasting only 1 and a half hours that will prohibit entry
within 200-yard radius of where the fireworks display will be
conducted. It is categorically excluded from further review under
paragraph L[60] of Appendix A, Table 1 of DHS Instruction Manual 023-
01-001-01, Rev. 1. A Record of Environmental Consideration supporting
this determination is available in the docket. For instructions on
locating the docket, see the ADDRESSES section of this preamble.

G. Protest Activities

    The Coast Guard respects the First Amendment rights of protesters.
Protesters are asked to call or email the person listed in the FOR
FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT section to coordinate protest activities so
that your message can be received without jeopardizing the safety or
security of people, places or vessels.

List of Subjects in 33 CFR Part 165

    Harbors, Marine safety, Navigation (water), Reporting and record
keeping

requirements, Security measures, Waterways.

    For the reasons discussed in the preamble, the Coast Guard amends
33 CFR part 165 as follows:

PART 165--REGULATED NAVIGATION AREAS AND LIMITED ACCESS AREAS

0
1. The authority citation for part 165 continues to read as follows:

    Authority:  46 U.S.C. 70034, 70051; 33 CFR 1.05-1, 6.04-1, 6.04-
6, and 160.5; Department of Homeland Security Delegation No.
00170.1, Revision No. 01.3.

0
2. Add Sec.  165.T09-0377 to read as follows:

Sec.  165.T09-0377  Safety Zone; Roostertail Fireworks, Detroit River;
Detroit, MI

    (a) Location. The following area is a temporary safety zone: all
U.S. navigable waters of the Detroit River within a within a 200-yard
radius of the fireworks launch site located at position
42[deg]41'15.75'' N, 082[deg]58'22.94'' W. All geographic coordinates
are North American Datum of 1983 (NAD 83).
    (b) Enforcement period. This regulation will be enforced from 9
p.m. through 10:30 p.m. on May 20, 2023. The Captain of the Port
Detroit, or a designated representative may suspend enforcement of the
safety zone at any time.
    (c) Definitions. As used in this section, designated representative
means a Coast Guard Patrol Commander, including a Coast Guard coxswain,
petty officer, or other officer operating a Coast Guard vessel and a
Federal, State, and local officer designated by or assisting the
Captain of the Port Detroit (COTP) in the enforcement of the safety
zone.
    (d) Regulations. (1) In accordance with the general regulations in
Sec.  165.23, entry into, transiting, or anchoring within the safety
zone described in paragraph (a) of this section is prohibited unless
authorized by the Captain of the Port Detroit or his designated
representative.
    (2) Vessel operators desiring to enter or operate within the safety
zone shall contact the Captain of the Port Detroit or his designated
representative to obtain permission to do so. Vessel operators given
permission to enter or operate in the safety zone must comply with all
directions given to them by the Captain of the Port Detroit or his
designated representative. The COTP Detroit or his designated
representative may be contacted via VHF Channel 16.

    Dated: May 8, 2023.
Brad W. Kelly,
Captain, U.S. Coast Guard, Captain of the Port Detroit.
[FR Doc. 2023-10149 Filed 5-11-23; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 9110-04-P


[Federal Register Volume 82, Number 5 (Monday, January 9, 2017)]
[Notices]
[Pages 2368-2369]
[FR Doc No: 2017-00143]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES

Food and Drug Administration

[Docket No. FDA-2016-N-0001]

Circulatory System Devices Panel of the Medical Devices Advisory
Committee; Notice of Meeting

AGENCY: Food and Drug Administration, HHS.

ACTION: Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Food and Drug Administration (FDA) announces a forthcoming
public advisory committee meeting of the Circulatory System Devices
Panel of the Medical Devices Advisory Committee. The general function
of the committee is to provide advice and recommendations to the Agency
on FDA's regulatory issues. The meeting will be open to the public.

DATES: The meeting will be held on February 23, 2017, from 8 a.m. to 6
p.m.

ADDRESSES: Hilton Washington, DC/North, Salons A, B, C and D, 620 Perry
Pkwy., Gaithersburg, MD 20877. The hotel's phone number is 301-977-
8900. Answers to commonly asked questions including information
regarding special accommodations due to a disability, visitor parking,
and transportation may be accessed at: http://www.fda.gov/AdvisoryCommittees/AboutAdvisoryCommittees/ucm408555.htm.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Evella Washington, Center for Devices
and Radiological Health, Food and Drug Administration, 10903 New
Hampshire Ave., Bldg. 66, Rm. G640, Silver Spring, MD 20993-0002,
<EMAIL_ADDRESS>301-796-6683, or FDA Advisory Committee
Information Line, 1-800-741-8138<PHONE_NUMBER> in the Washington, DC
area). A notice in the Federal Register about last minute modifications
that impact a previously announced advisory committee meeting cannot
always be published quickly enough to provide timely notice. Therefore,
you should always check the Agency's Web site at http://www.fda.gov/
AdvisoryCommittees/

default.htm and scroll down to the appropriate advisory committee
meeting link, or call the advisory committee information line to learn
about possible modifications before coming to the meeting.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
    Agenda: On February 23, 2017, the committee will discuss and make
recommendations on clinical information related to the de novo request
for the Sentinel[supreg] Cerebral Protection System, a first of a kind
embolic protection device to be used with transcatheter aortic valve
replacement (TAVR) procedures.
    FDA intends to make background material available to the public no
later than 2 business days before the meeting. If FDA is unable to post
the background material on its Web site prior to the meeting, the
background material will be made publicly available at the location of
the advisory committee meeting, and the background material will be
posted on FDA's Web site after the meeting. Background material is
available at http://www.fda.gov/AdvisoryCommittees/Calendar/default.htm. Scroll down to the appropriate advisory committee meeting
link.
    Procedure: Interested persons may present data, information, or
views, orally or in writing, on issues pending before the committee.
Written submissions may be made to the contact person on or before
February 9, 2017. Oral presentations from the public will be scheduled
between approximately 1 p.m. and 2 p.m. Those individuals interested in
making formal oral presentations should notify the contact person and
submit a brief statement of the general nature of the evidence or
arguments they wish to present, the names and addresses of proposed
participants, and an indication of the approximate time requested to
make their presentation on or before February 1, 2017. Time allotted
for each presentation may be limited. If the number of registrants
requesting to speak is greater than can be reasonably accommodated
during the scheduled open public hearing session, FDA may conduct a
lottery to determine the speakers for the scheduled open public hearing
session. The contact person will notify interested persons regarding
their request to speak by February 2, 2017.
    Persons attending FDA's advisory committee meetings are advised
that the Agency is not responsible for providing access to electrical
outlets.
    FDA welcomes the attendance of the public at its advisory committee
meetings and will make every effort to accommodate persons with
disabilities. If you require accommodations due to a disability, please
contact AnnMarie Williams at<EMAIL_ADDRESS>or 301-796-
5966 at least 7 days in advance of the meeting.
    FDA is committed to the orderly conduct of its advisory committee
meetings. Please visit our Web site at http://www.fda.gov/AdvisoryCommittees/AboutAdvisoryCommittees/ucm111462.htm for procedures
on public conduct during advisory committee meetings.
    Notice of this meeting is given under the Federal Advisory
Committee Act (5 U.S.C. app. 2).

    Dated: January 4, 2017.
Janice M. Soreth,
Associate Commissioner, Special Medical Programs.
[FR Doc. 2017-00143 Filed 1-6-17; 8:45 am]
 BILLING CODE 4164-01-P


[Federal Register: August 3, 2010 (Volume 75, Number 148)]
[Notices]
[Page 45623]
[DOCID:fr03au10-62]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission

[Docket No. AD10-12-000]

Increasing Market and Planning Efficiency Through Improved
Software; Notice Establishing Date for Comments

July 27, 2010.
    In June 2010, Commission staff convened the following technical
conferences regarding models and software related to wholesale
electricity markets and planning: \1\

    \1\ Notice of Technical Conference to Discuss Increasing Market
and Planning Efficiency Through Improved Software, 75 FR 27,341
(2010).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

June 2-3 Enhanced Unit-Commitment Models.
June 9-10 Enhanced Wide-Area Planning Models.
June 23-24 Enhanced Optimal Power Flow Models.

    Parties wishing to submit written comments regarding the matters
discussed at the technical conferences should submit their comments in
Docket No. AD10-12-000 on or before September 10, 2010.

Kimberly D. Bose,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2010-18967 Filed 8-2-10; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6717-01-P


[Federal Register Volume 80, Number 46 (Tuesday, March 10, 2015)]
[Notices]
[Pages 12664-12666]
[FR Doc No: 2015-05497]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

[Release No. 34-74441; File No. SR-NYSEArca-2014-150]

Self-Regulatory Organizations; NYSE Arca, Inc.; Order Granting
Approval of a Proposed Rule Change, as Modified by Amendment No. 1, To
Amend Rule 6.60 and To Adopt Rule 6.61, Which Was Previously Reserved,
To Provide Price Protection for Market Maker Quotes

March 4, 2015.

I. Introduction

    On December 29, 2014, NYSE Arca, Inc. (``Exchange'') filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission (``Commission''), pursuant to
Section 19(b)(1) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (``Act'') \1\
and Rule 19b-4 thereunder,\2\ a proposed rule change to amend Exchange
Rule 6.60 (Price Protection) and to adopt Exchange Rule 6.61 to provide
price protection for Market Maker quotes. The proposed rule change was
published for comment in the Federal Register on January 14, 2015.\3\
The Commission received no comment letters on the proposal. On March 2,
2015, the Exchange filed Amendment No. 1 to the proposed rule
change.\4\ This order approves the proposed rule change, as modified by
Amendment No. 1 thereto.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \1\ 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(1).
    \2\ 17 CFR 240.19b-4.
    \3\ See Securities Exchange Act Release No. 74018 (January 8,
2015), 80 FR 1982 (``Notice'').
    \4\ In Amendment No. 1, the Exchange clarified that it believes
that Market Maker bids should not be priced the same as or higher
than the corresponding benchmark, which would be the price of the
underlying security for call options and the strike price for put
options. Amendment No. 1 does not change any of the proposed rule
text that was submitted in the original filing. Amendment No. 1 is
technical in nature and, therefore, the Commission is not publishing
it for comment.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

II. Description of the Proposal

    The Exchange proposed to amend Exchange Rule 6.60 and to adopt
Exchange Rule 6.61, which was previously Reserved, to provide price
protection for Market Maker quotes. Exchange Rule 6.60 currently
applies and will continue to apply solely to orders. Exchange Rule
6.60(b), provides a price protection filter for incoming limit orders,
pursuant to which the Exchange rejects limit orders priced a specified
percentage \5\ through the National Best Bid (``NBB'') or National Best
Offer (``NBO'') (``Limit Order Filter''). To clarify that Exchange Rule
6.60 applies only to orders, the Exchange proposed to append the word
``Orders'' to the Exchange Rule 6.60 header to provide ``Rule 6.60.
Price Protection--Orders.'' \6\

---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \5\ Pursuant to Exchange Rule 6.60(b), unless determined
otherwise by the Exchange and announced to OTP Holders and OTP Firms
via Trader Update, the specified percentage is 100% for the contra-
side NBB or NBO priced at or below $1.00 and 50% for contra-side NBB
or NBO priced above $1.00. See Notice, supra note 3, at 1983.
    \6\ See Notice, supra note 3, at 1983.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

A. Proposed Market Maker Quote Price Protection

    The Exchange proposed to adopt new Exchange Rule 6.61 to provide
for a price protection mechanism for quotes entered by a Market Maker.
Exchange Rule 6.61(a) will provide price protection filters applicable
only for quotes entered by a Market Maker pursuant to Rule 6.37B and
will not be applicable to orders entered by a Market Maker. The
Exchange proposed to provide for two layers of price protection that
will be applicable to all incoming Market Maker quotes.\7\ The first
layer of price protection will assess incoming sell quotes against the
NBB and incoming buy quotes against the NBO.\8\ The second layer of
price protection will assess the price of call or put bids against a
specified benchmark.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \7\ The Exchange states that the proposal will assist with the
maintenance of fair and orderly markets by averting the risk of
Market Maker quotes sweeping through multiple price points resulting
in executions at prices that are through the last sale price or
National Best Bid or Best Offer (``NBBO''). See Notice, supra note
3, at 1983.
    \8\ The Exchange represents that this proposed price protection
mechanism is similar to the Exchange's Limit Order Filter. See
Notice, supra note 3, at 1983.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

1. NBBO Price Reasonability Check
    Proposed Exchange Rule 6.61(a)(1) sets forth the Exchange's
proposed NBBO price reasonability check, which will compare Market
Maker bids with the NBO and Market Maker offers with the NBB.
Specifically, provided that an NBBO is available, a Market Maker quote
will be rejected if it is priced a specified dollar amount or
percentage through the contra-side NBBO as follows:
    (A) $1.00 for Market Maker bids when the contra-side NBO is priced
at or below $1.00; or
    (B) 50% for Market Maker bids (offers) when the contra-side NBO
(NBB) is priced above $1.00.
    The Exchange will reject inbound Market Maker quotes that exceed
the parameters set forth in proposed Exchange Rule 6.61(a)(1)(A)-
(B).\9\ The

Exchange states that it has proposed a specific dollar threshold for
when the NBO is priced at or below $1.00 because, for such low-priced
NBOs, the Exchange believes it is appropriate to provide Market Makers
with the ability to enter quotes at least $1.00 higher than the
prevailing NBO.\10\ For example, if the NBO were $0.06, when using a
100% filter, the Exchange would be required to reject any bids priced
$0.12 or more. In addition, the Exchange proposed that pursuant to
proposed Exchange Rule 6.61(a)(1)(A), Market Maker offers that arrive
when the NBB is priced at or below $1.00 will not be subject to this
filter. The Exchange notes that when the NBB is priced at or below
$1.00, the price of an offer will be bound by $0.00, and therefore an
offer will always be less than $1.00 away from the NBB.\11\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \9\ The Exchange states that the proposed percentages are
appropriate because they are based on the percentages established
for the Limit Order Filter. See Notice, supra note 3, at 1983.
    \10\ See Notice, supra note 3, at 1983.
    \11\ The Exchange states that such offer prices would likely not
be erroneous and therefore the Exchange does not believe it
necessary to reject such Market Maker offers. See Notice, supra note
3, at 1983.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    Because there may be market scenarios that require the proposed
parameters to be adjusted, for example, during periods of extreme price
volatility, the Exchange has further proposed that the Exchange may
revise these parameters, provided such revised parameters are announced
to OTP Holders or OTP Firms via a Trader Update.\12\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \12\ See proposed Exchange Rule 6.61(a)(1)(A)-(B) (setting forth
the specified dollar amount or percentages ``unless determined
otherwise by the Exchange and announced to OTP Holders and OTP Firms
via Trader Update'').
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    The Exchange also proposed that if a Market Maker quote is rejected
pursuant to paragraph (a)(1) of the proposed rule, the Exchange will
also cancel any resting same-side quote in the affected series from
that Market Maker.\13\ According to the Exchange, even if the new quote
is rejected because it is priced a specified dollar amount or
percentage through the contra-side NBBO, in violation of proposed
Exchange Rule 6.61(a)(1), the Market Maker's implicit instruction to
cancel the resting quote remains valid nonetheless.\14\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \13\ See proposed Exchange Rule 6.61(b). The Exchange states
that it believes it is appropriate to reject any resting same-side
quote because when a Market Maker submits a new quote, that Market
Maker is implicitly instructing the Exchange to cancel any resting
quote in that same series. See Notice, supra note 3, at 1983.
    \14\ See Notice, supra note 3, at 1984 for examples illustrating
how proposed Exchange Rule 6.61(a) will operate.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

2. Underlying Stock Price/Strike Price Check
    The Exchange also has proposed new Exchange Rule 6.61(a)(2) and (3)
which will set forth the Exchange's proposed second layer of price
protection filters for Market Maker quotes. These price protection
mechanisms will be applicable when either there is no NBBO available,
for example, during pre-opening or prior to conducting a re-opening
after a trading halt, or if the NBBO is so wide as to not to reflect an
appropriate price for the respective options series. Proposed Exchange
Rule 6.61(a)(2) will also provide price protection for Market Maker
bids in call options. As proposed, if such bids equal or exceed the
price of the underlying security, the Market Maker bid will be
rejected.\15\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \15\ See proposed Exchange Rule 6.61(a)(2). With a call bid, a
Market Maker is bidding to buy an option that would be exercised
into the right to acquire the underlying security. The Exchange
states that it does not believe that a derivative product, which
conveys the right to purchase a security underlying the derivative,
should ever be priced the same as or higher than the prevailing
price of the underlying security itself. Accordingly, the Exchange
believes it is appropriate to reject Market Maker bids for call
options that are equal to or in excess of the price of the
underlying security. See Notice, supra note 3, at 1984. See also
Amendment No. 1, supra note 4.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    Under new Exchange Rule 6.61(a)(2)(A), before the underlying
security is open, the Exchange will use the previous day's closing
price to determine the price of the underlying security.\16\ Under new
Exchange Rule 6.61(a)(2)(B), once the underlying security has opened,
the Exchange will use the consolidated last sale price to determine the
price of the underlying security. Under new Exchange Rule
6.61(a)(2)(C), during a trading halt of the underlying security, the
Exchange will use the consolidated last sale reported immediately prior
to the trading halt to determine the price of the underlying
security.\17\ New Exchange Rule 6.61(a)(3) will provide for price
protection for Market Maker bids in put options. In particular, any
Market Maker bid for put options will be rejected if the price of the
bid is equal to or greater than the strike price of the option.\18\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \16\ According to the Exchange, although the underlying
securities may trade in the equities markets outside of 9:30 a.m. ET
to 4:00 p.m. ET, the equities market is generally not as liquid
during this time and equity market makers generally do not have
quoting obligations in after-hours trading. Therefore, the Exchange
believes that using the previous day's closing price--based on
trading during Core Trading Hours, when the market is most liquid--
provides a more accurate benchmark and thus a more precise price
protection filter for underlying securities that have not yet
opened. See Notice, supra note 3, at 1984.
    \17\ The Exchange believes that the consolidated last sale price
for an underlying security that has already opened will provide the
most accurate benchmark because the market is most liquid during
Core Trading Hours. See Notice, supra note 3, at 1984.
    \18\ The Exchange states that the value of a put can never
exceed the strike price of the option, even if the stock goes to
zero. For example, a put with a strike price of $50 gives the holder
the right to sell the underlying security for $50 (no more, or no
less), therefore the Exchange states that it would be illogical to
pay $50 or more for the right to sell that underlying security, no
matter what the price of the underlying security. See Notice, supra
note 3, at 1984. See also Amendment No. 1, supra note 4.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    The Exchange also has proposed that when a Market Maker quote is
rejected pursuant to paragraph (a)(2) or (a)(3) of the proposed rule,
the Exchange will also cancel all resting quote(s) in the affected
class(es) from that Market Maker and will not accept new quote(s) in
the affected class(es) until the Market Maker submits a message (which
may be automated) to the Exchange to enable the entry of new
quotes.\19\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \19\ See proposed Exchange Rule 6.61(b). The Exchange believes
that this temporary suspension from quoting in the affected option
class(es) would operate as a safety valve that forces Market Makers
to re-evaluate their positions before requesting to re-enter the
market. See Notice, supra note 3, at 1984. See also Notice, supra
note 3, at 1984-5 for examples illustrating how proposed Exchange
Rule 6.61(a)(2) and (a)(3) would operate.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

B. Implementation

    The Exchange stated that it would announce the implementation date
of the proposed rule change in a Trader Update and publish such
announcement at least 30 days prior to implementation.

III. Discussion and Commission Findings

    After careful review, the Commission finds that the proposed rule
change is consistent with the requirements of the Act and the rules and
regulations thereunder applicable to a national securities exchange
and, in particular, with Section 6(b) of the Act.\20\ In particular,
the Commission finds that the proposed rule change is consistent with
Sections 6(b)(5) of the Act,\21\ which requires, among other things,
that the rules of a national securities exchange be designed to prevent
fraudulent and manipulative acts and practices, to promote just and
equitable principles of trade, to foster cooperation and coordination
with persons engaged in regulating, clearing, settling, processing
information with respect to, and facilitating transactions in
securities, to remove impediments to and perfect the mechanism of a
free and open market and a national market system, and, in

general, to protect investors and the public interest.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \20\ 15 U.S.C. 78f(b). In approving this proposed rule change,
the Commission has considered the proposed rule's impact on
efficiency, competition, and capital formation. See 15 U.S.C.
78c(f).
    \21\ 15 U.S.C. 78f(b)(5).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    The proposed rule change provides a price protection mechanism for
quotes entered by a Market Maker when an NBBO is available that are
priced a specified dollar amount or percentage through the last sale or
prevailing contra-side market, which the Exchange believes is evidence
of error. The Commission believes that the proposed price protection
mechanism is reasonably designed to promote just and equitable
principles of trade by preventing potential price dislocation that
could result from erroneous Market Maker quotes sweeping through
multiple price points resulting in executions at prices that are
through the last sale price or NBBO.\22\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \22\ See Notice, supra note 3, at 1985.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    The Exchange's proposed use of benchmarks to check the
reasonability of Market Maker bids for call and put options affords a
second layer of price protection to Market Maker quotes. The Commission
believes that the additional price reasonability check on Market Maker
bids that are priced equal to or greater than the price of the
underlying security for call options, and equal to or greater than the
strike price for put options, is reasonably designed to operate in
manner that would remove impediments to and perfect the mechanism of a
free and open market and protect investors and the public interest.
Further, the Commission notes the Exchange's belief that the additional
risk controls that result in the cancellation of a Market Maker's
resting same side quote and/or the temporary suspension a Market
Maker's quoting activity in the affected option class(es), as
applicable, provide market participants with additional protection from
anomalous executions.\23\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \23\ See Notice, supra note 3, at 1985.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    Accordingly, the Commission believes that the proposed price
protection for Market Maker quotes is reasonably designed to prevent
fraudulent and manipulative acts and practices, to promote just and
equitable principles of trade, to foster cooperation and coordination
with persons engaged in regulating, clearing, settling, processing
information with respect to, and facilitating transactions in
securities, to remove impediments to and perfect the mechanism of a
free and open market and a national market system, and, in general, to
protect investors and the public interest.

IV. Conclusion

    For the foregoing reasons, the Commission finds that the proposed
rule change is consistent with the Act and the rules and regulations
thereunder applicable to a national securities exchange.
    It is therefore ordered, pursuant to Section 19(b)(2) of the
Act,\24\ that the proposed rule change (SR-NYSEArca-2014-150), as
modified by Amendment No. 1, be, and hereby is, approved.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \24\ 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(2).

    For the Commission, by the Division of Trading and Markets,
pursuant to delegated authority.\25\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \25\ 17 CFR 200.30-3(a)(12).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

Jill M. Peterson,
Assistant Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2015-05497 Filed 3-9-15; 8:45 am]
 BILLING CODE 8011-01-P


[Federal Register Volume 86, Number 180 (Tuesday, September 21, 2021)]
[Notices]
[Page 52453]
[FR Doc No: 2021-20383]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission

Notice of Effectiveness of Exempt Wholesale Generator Status

------------------------------------------------------------------------
                                                       Docket No.
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Blythe Mesa Solar II, LLC....................  EG21-164-000
Corazon Energy, LLC..........................  EG21-165-000
Trent River Solar Mile Lessee, LLC...........  EG21-166-000
Golden Hills Wind Farm LLC...................  EG21-167-000
CED Crane Solar, LLC.........................  EG21-168-000
BRP Sweeny BESS LLC..........................  EG21-169-000
Lincoln Land Wind, LLC.......................  EG21-170-000
ES 1A Group 2 Opco, LLC......................  EG21-171-000
Edwards Sanborn Storage I, LLC...............  EG21-172-000
ES 1A Group 3 Opco, LLC......................  EG21-173-000
Edwards Solar Line I, LLC....................  EG21-174-000
Prairie Wolf Solar, LLC......................  EG21-175-000
Daylight I, LLC..............................  EG21-176-000
Sanborn Solar Line I, LLC....................  EG21-177-000
Edwards Sanborn Storage II, LLC..............  EG21-178-000
Clover Creek Solar, LLC......................  EG21-179-000
Antelope Expansion 1B, LLC...................  EG21-180-000
Ensign Wind Energy, LLC......................  EG21-181-000
Independence Wind Energy LLC.................  EG21-182-000
Glass Sands Wind Energy, LLC.................  EG21-183-000
Board River Solar, LLC.......................  EG21-184-000
CPRE 1 Lessee, LLC...........................  EG21-185-000
Speedway Solar NC, LLC.......................  EG21-186-000
Stony Knoll Solar, LLC.......................  EG21-187-000
Lancaster Solar LLC..........................  EG21-188-000
SR Georgia Portfolio II Lessee, LLC..........  EG21-189-000
SR Lumpkin, LLC..............................  EG21-190-000
SR Snipesville II, LLC.......................  EG21-191-000
Jayhawk Wind, LLC............................  EG21-192-000
Minonk Stewardship Wind LLC..................  EG21-193-000
------------------------------------------------------------------------

    Take notice that during the month of August 2021, the status of the
above-captioned entities as Exempt Wholesale Generators became
effective by operation of the Commission's regulations. 18 CFR 366.7(a)
(2020).

    Dated: September 15, 2021.
Debbie-Anne A. Reese,
Deputy Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2021-20383 Filed 9-20-21; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6717-01-P


[Federal Register Volume 76, Number 74 (Monday, April 18, 2011)]
[Proposed Rules]
[Pages 21677-21682]
[FR Doc No: 2011-9148]

=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY

Coast Guard

33 CFR Part 165

[Docket No. USCG-2011-0188]
RIN 1625-AA00

Safety Zones; Annual Events Requiring Safety Zones in the Captain
of the Port Sault Sainte Marie Zone

AGENCY: Coast Guard, DHS.

ACTION: Notice of proposed rulemaking.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Coast Guard proposes to establish regulations requiring
safety zones in the Captain of the Port Sault Sainte Marie zone. This
proposed rule is intended to establish safety zones that will restrict
vessels from certain portions of water areas within the Sector Sault
Ste Marie Captain of the Port zone, as defined by our regulations.
These proposed safety zones are necessary to protect spectators,
participants, and vessels from the hazards associated with various
maritime events.

DATES: Comments and related materials must be received by the Coast
Guard on or before May 18, 2011.

ADDRESSES: You may submit comments identified by docket number USCG-
2011-0188 using any one of the following methods:
    (1) Federal eRulemaking Portal: http://www.regulations.gov.
    (2) Fax:<PHONE_NUMBER>.
    (3) Mail: Docket Management Facility (M-30), U.S. Department of
Transportation, West Building Ground Floor, Room W12-140, 1200 New
Jersey Avenue, SE., Washington, DC 20590-0001.
    (4) Hand delivery: Same as mail address above, between 9 a.m. and 5
p.m., Monday through Friday, except Federal holidays. The telephone
number is<PHONE_NUMBER>.
    To avoid duplication, please use only one of these four methods.
See the ``Public Participation and Request for Comments'' portion of
the SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION section below for instructions on
submitting comments.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: If you have questions on this proposed
rule, call or e-mail BMC Gregory Ford, Prevention Department, Coast
Guard, Sector Sault Sainte Marie, MI, telephone<PHONE_NUMBER>, e-mail
<EMAIL_ADDRESS>If you have questions on viewing or submitting
material to the docket, call Renee V. Wright, Program Manager, Docket
Operations, telephone<PHONE_NUMBER>.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

Public Participation and Request for Comments

    We encourage you to participate in this rulemaking by submitting
comments and related materials. All comments received will be posted,
without change, to http://www.regulations.gov and will include any
personal information you have provided.

Submitting Comments

    If you submit a comment, please include the docket number for this
rulemaking (USCG-2011-0188), indicate the specific section of this
document to which each comment applies, and provide a reason for each
suggestion or recommendation. You may submit your comments and material
online (via http://www.regulations.gov) or by fax, mail, or hand
delivery, but please use only one of these means. If you submit a

comment online via http://www.regulations.gov, it will be considered
received by the Coast Guard when you successfully transmit the comment.
If you fax, hand deliver, or mail your comment, it will be considered
as having been received by the Coast Guard when it is received at the
Docket Management Facility. We recommend that you include your name and
a mailing address, an e-mail address, or a telephone number in the body
of your document so that we can contact you if we have questions
regarding your submission.
    To submit your comment online, go to http://www.regulations.gov,
click on the ``submit a comment'' box, which will then become
highlighted in blue. In the ``Document Type'' drop down menu select
``Proposed Rule'' and insert ``USCG-2011-0188'' in the ``Keyword'' box.
Click ``Search'' then click on the balloon shape in the ``Actions''
column. If you submit your comments by mail or hand delivery, submit
them in an unbound format, no larger than 8\1/2\ by 11 inches, suitable
for copying and electronic filing. If you submit comments by mail and
would like to know that they reached the Facility, please enclose a
stamped, self-addressed postcard or envelope. We will consider all
comments and material received during the comment period and may change
the rule based on your comments.

Viewing Comments and Documents

    To view comments, as well as documents mentioned in this preamble
as being available in the docket, go to http://www.regulations.gov,
click on the ``Read Comments'' box, which will then become highlighted
in blue. In the ``Keyword'' box insert ``USCG-2011-0188'' and click
``Search.'' Click the ``Open Docket Folder'' in the ``Actions'' column.
You may also visit the Docket Management Facility in Room W12-140 on
the ground floor of the Department of Transportation West Building,
1200 New Jersey Avenue, SE., Washington, DC 20590, between 9 a.m. and 5
p.m., Monday through Friday, except Federal holidays. We have an
agreement with the Department of Transportation to use the Docket
Management Facility.

Privacy Act

    Anyone can search the electronic form of comments received into any
of our dockets by the name of the individual submitting the comment (or
signing the comment, if submitted on behalf of an association,
business, labor union, etc.). You may review a Privacy Act notice
regarding our public dockets in the January 17, 2008, issue of the
Federal Register (73 FR 3316).

Public Meeting

    We do not now plan to hold a public meeting, but you may submit a
request for one by using one of the four methods specified under
ADDRESSES. Please explain why you believe a public meeting would be
beneficial. If we determine that one would aid this rulemaking, we will
hold one at a time and place announced by a later notice in the Federal
Register.

Background and Purpose

    This proposed rule will add 33 CFR 165.9xx, Annual Events requiring
safety zones in the Captain of the Port Sault Sainte Marie zone.
Various private and public entities organize marine events within the
Sault Sainte Marie Captain of the Port zone. Many of these events recur
in the same location on or about the same date each year. Also, many of
these events pose hazards to the public. Such hazards include
obstructions to the navigable channels, explosive dangers associated
with fireworks, debris falling into the water, and general congestion
of waterways. To minimize these and other hazards, this proposed rule
will establish twenty safety zones, each related to a specific
recurring marine event.

Discussion of Proposed Rule

    This proposed rule and its associated safety zones are necessary to
ensure the safety of vessels and people during each of the annual
marine events discussed below.
    Although this rule will remain in effect year round, the proposed
safety zones will be enforced only immediately before, during, and
after each corresponding event.
    The Captain of the Port Sault Sainte Marie will notify the public
when the safety zones in this proposal will be enforced. In keeping
with 33 CFR 165.7(a), the Captain of the Port Sault Sainte Marie will
use all appropriate means to notify the affected segments of the
public. This will include, as practicable, publication in the Federal
Register, Broadcast Notice to Mariners, and Local Notice to Mariners.
The Captain of the Port will, as practicable, issue a Broadcast Notice
to Mariners notifying the public when any enforcement period is
cancelled.
    Entry into, transiting, or anchoring within each of the below
safety zones is prohibited unless authorized by the Captain of the Port
Sault Sainte Marie or his or her designated representative. All persons
and vessels permitted to enter one of the safety zones established by
this proposed rule shall comply with the instructions of the Coast
Guard Captain of the Port or the designated representative. The Captain
of the Port or his or her designated representative may be contacted
via VHF Channel 16.

Regulatory Analyses

    We developed this proposed rule after considering numerous statutes
and executive orders related to rulemaking. Below we summarize our
analyses based on 13 of these statutes or executive orders.

Regulatory Planning and Review

    This proposed rule is not a significant regulatory action under
section 3(f) of Executive Order 12866, Regulatory Planning and Review,
and does not require an assessment of potential costs and benefits
under section 6(a)(3) of that Order. The Office of Management and
Budget has not reviewed it under that Order. It is not ``significant''
under the regulatory policies and procedures of the Department of
Homeland Security (DHS). We conclude that this proposed rule is not a
significant regulatory action because we anticipate that it will have
minimal impact on the economy, will not interfere with other agencies,
will not adversely alter the budget of any grant or loan recipients,
and will not raise any novel legal or policy issues. The safety zones
created by this proposed rule will be relatively small and enforced for
a relatively short time. Also, each safety zone is designed to minimize
its impact on navigable waters. Furthermore, each safety zone has been
designed to allow vessels to transit unrestricted to portions of the
waterways not affected by the safety zones. Thus, restrictions on
vessel movement within that particular area are expected to be minimal.
Under certain conditions, moreover, vessels may still transit through
each safety zone when permitted by the Captain of the Port. On the
whole, the Coast Guard expects insignificant adverse impact to mariners
from the activation of these safety zones.

Small Entities

    Under the Regulatory Flexibility Act (5 U.S.C. 601-612), we have
considered whether this proposed rule would have a significant economic
impact on a substantial number of small entities. The term ``small
entities'' comprises small businesses, not-for-profit organizations
that are independently owned and operated and are not dominant in their
fields, and governmental jurisdictions with populations of less than
50,000.

    The Coast Guard certifies under 5 U.S.C. 605(b) that this proposed
rule would not have a significant economic impact on a substantial
number of small entities. This proposed rule would affect the following
entities, some of which might be small entities: The owners and
operators of vessels intending to transit or anchor in any one of the
below established safety zones while the safety zone is being enforced.
These safety zones will not have a significant economic impact on a
substantial number of small entities for the following reasons: Each
safety zone in this proposed rule will be in effect for only a few
hours within any given 24 hour period. Each of the safety zones, with
one exception, will be in effect only once per year. Furthermore, these
safety zones have been designed to allow traffic to pass safely around
each zone. Moreover, vessels will be allowed to pass through each zone
at the discretion of the Captain of the Port.
    If you think that your business, organization, or governmental
jurisdiction qualifies as a small entity and that this proposed rule
would have a significant economic impact on it, please submit a comment
(see ADDRESSES) explaining why you think it qualifies and how and to
what degree this rule would economically affect it.

Assistance for Small Entities

    Under section 213(a) of the Small Business Regulatory Enforcement
Fairness Act of 1996 (Pub. L. 104-121), we want to assist small
entities in understanding this proposed rule so that they can better
evaluate its effects on them and participate in the rulemaking. If the
rule would affect your small business, organization, or governmental
jurisdiction and you have questions concerning its provisions or
options for compliance, please contact BMC Gregory Ford, Prevention
Department, Coast Guard Sector Sault Sainte Marie, MI at (906) 635-
3222. The Coast Guard will not retaliate against small entities that
question or complain about this proposed rule or any policy or action
of the Coast Guard.

Collection of Information

    This proposed rule calls for no new collection of information under
the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 (44 U.S.C. 3501-3520).

Federalism

    A rule has implications for federalism under Executive Order 13132,
Federalism, if it has a substantial direct effect on State or local
governments and would either preempt State law or impose a substantial
direct cost of compliance on them. We have analyzed this proposed rule
under that Order and have determined that it does not have implications
for federalism.

Unfunded Mandates Reform Act

    The Unfunded Mandates Reform Act of 1995 (2 U.S.C. 1531-1538)
requires Federal agencies to assess the effects of their discretionary
regulatory actions. In particular, the Act addresses actions that may
result in the expenditure by a State, local, or Tribal government, in
the aggregate, or by the private sector of $100,000,000 (adjusted for
inflation) or more in any one year. Though this proposed rule would not
result in such an expenditure, we do discuss the effects of this rule
elsewhere in this preamble.

Taking of Private Property

    This proposed rule will not affect the taking of private property
or otherwise have taking implications under Executive Order 12630,
Governmental Actions and Interference with Constitutionally Protected
Property Rights.

Civil Justice Reform

    This proposed rule meets applicable standards in sections 3(a) and
3(b)(2) of Executive Order 12988, Civil Justice Reform, to minimize
litigation, eliminate ambiguity, and reduce burden.

Protection of Children

    We have analyzed this proposed rule under Executive Order 13045,
Protection of Children from Environmental Health Risks and Safety
Risks. This proposed rule is not an economically significant rule and
would not create an environmental risk to health or risk to safety that
might disproportionately affect children.

Indian Tribal Governments

    The Coast Guard recognizes the treaty rights of Native American
Tribes. Moreover, the Coast Guard is committed to working with Tribal
Governments to implement local policies and to mitigate Tribal
concerns. We have determined that this rule and fishing rights
protection need not be incompatible. We have also determined that this
proposed rule does not have Tribal implications under Executive Order
13175, Consultation and Coordination with Indian Tribal Governments,
because it does not have a substantial direct effect on one or more
Indian Tribes, on the relationship between the Federal Government and
Indian Tribes, or on the distribution of power and responsibilities
between the Federal Government and Indian Tribes. Nevertheless, Indian
Tribes that have questions concerning the provisions of this proposed
rule or options for compliance are encouraged to contact the point of
contact listed under FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT.

Energy Effects

    We have analyzed this proposed rule under Executive Order 13211,
Actions Concerning Regulations That Significantly Affect Energy Supply,
Distribution, or Use. We have determined that it is not a ``significant
energy action'' under that order because it is not a ``significant
regulatory action'' under Executive Order 12866 and is not likely to
have a significant adverse effect on the supply, distribution, or use
of energy. The Administrator of the Office of Information and
Regulatory Affairs has not designated it as a significant energy
action. Therefore, it does not require a Statement of Energy Effects
under Executive Order 13211.

Technical Standards

    The National Technology Transfer and Advancement Act (NTTAA) (15
U.S.C. 272 note) directs agencies to use voluntary consensus standards
in their regulatory activities unless the agency provides Congress,
through the Office of Management and Budget, with an explanation of why
using these standards would be inconsistent with applicable law or
otherwise impractical. Voluntary consensus standards are technical
standards (e.g., specifications of materials, performance, design, or
operation; test methods; sampling procedures; and related management
systems practices) that are developed or adopted by voluntary consensus
standards bodies.
    This proposed rule does not use technical standards. Therefore, we
did not consider the use of voluntary consensus standards.

Environment

    We have analyzed this proposed rule under Department of Homeland
Security Management Directive 023-01 and Commandant Instruction
M16475.lD, which guide the Coast Guard in complying with the National
Environmental Policy Act of 1969 (NEPA)(42 U.S.C. 4321-4370f), and have
made a preliminary determination that this action is one of a category
of actions that do not individually or cumulatively have a significant
effect on the human environment. A preliminary environmental analysis
checklist supporting this preliminary determination is available in the
docket where indicated under ADDRESSES. This

proposed rule establishes a safety zone and therefore paragraph (34)(g)
of figure 2-1 applies. We seek any comments or information that may
lead to the discovery of a significant environmental impact from this
proposed rule.

List of Subjects in 33 CFR Part 165

    Harbors, Marine safety, Navigation (water), Reporting and
recordkeeping requirements, Security measures, Waterways.

    For the reasons discussed in the preamble, the Coast Guard proposes
to amend 33 CFR Part 165 as follows:

PART 165--REGULATED NAVIGATION AREAS AND LIMITED ACCESS AREAS

    1. The authority citation for Part 165 continues to read as
follows:

    Authority: 33 U.S.C. 1231; 46 U.S.C. Chapter 701; 50 U.S.C. 191,
195; 33 CFR 1.05-1, 6.04-1, 6.04-6, and 160.5; Pub. L. 107-295, 116
Stat. 2064; Department of Homeland Security Delegation No. 0170.1.

    2. Add Sec.  165.918 to read as follows:

Sec.  165.918  Safety Zones; Annual events requiring safety zones in
the Captain of the Port Sault Sainte Marie zone.

    (a) Safety Zones. The following areas are designated safety zones:
    (1) Marquette Fourth of July Celebration Fireworks; Marquette, MI:
    (i) Location. All U.S. navigable waters of Marquette Harbor within
a 1000-foot radius of the fireworks launch site, centered approximately
1250 feet south of the Mattson Park Bulkhead Dock and 450 feet east of
Ripley Rock, at position 46[deg]32'21.7'' N, 087[deg]23'07.60'' W
[DATUM: NAD 83].
    (ii) Enforcement Period This safety zone will be enforced each year
on July 4 from 9 p.m. until 11 p.m. If the July 4 fireworks are
cancelled due to inclement weather, then this section will be enforced
July 5 from 9 p.m. until 11 p.m.
    (2) Munising Fourth of July Celebration Fireworks; Munising, MI:
    (i) Location. All U.S. navigable waters of South Bay within a 600-
foot radius from the fireworks launch site at the end of the Munising
City Dock, centered in position: 46[deg]24'50.08'' N,
086[deg]39'08.52'' W [DATUM: NAD 83].
    (ii) Enforcement Period This safety zone will be enforced each year
on July 4 from 9 p.m. until 12:30 a.m. on July 5. If the July 4
fireworks are cancelled due to inclement weather, then this section
will be enforced on July 5 from 9 p.m. until 12:30 a.m. on July 6.
    (3) Grand Marais Splash-In; Grand Marais, MI:
    (i) Location. All U.S. navigable within the southern portion of
West Bay bound to the north by a line beginning approximately 175 feet
south-southeast of the Lake Street Boat Launch, extending 5280 feet to
the east on a true bearing of 079 degrees. The eastern boundary will
then be formed by a line drawn to the shoreline on a true bearing of
170 degrees. The western and southern boundaries of the zone will be
bound by the shoreline of West Bay. The coordinates for this zone are
as follows: 46[deg]40'22.32'' N, 085[deg]59'00.66'' W,
46[deg]40'32.04'' N, 085[deg]57'46.14'' W, and 46[deg]40'19.68'' N,
085[deg]57'43.08'' W [DATUM: NAD 83], with the West Bay shoreline
forming the South and West boundaries of the zone.
    (ii) Enforcement Period. Each year on the second to last Saturday
in June from 2 p.m. until 5 p.m.
    (4) Sault Sainte Marie Fourth of July Celebration Fireworks; Sault
Sainte Marie, MI:
    (i) Location. All U.S. navigable waters of the St. Marys River
within a 750-foot radius around the eastern portion of the U.S. Army
Corp of Engineers Soo Locks North East Pier, centered in position:
46[deg]30'19.66'' N, 084[deg]20'31.61'' W [DATUM: NAD 83].
    (ii) Enforcement Period. This safety zone will be enforced each
year on July 4 from 9 p.m. until 11:30 p.m. If the July 4 fireworks are
cancelled due to inclement weather, then this section will be enforced
July 5 from 9 p.m. until 11:30 p.m.
    (5) St. Ignace Fourth of July Celebration Fireworks; St. Ignace,
MI:
    (i) Location. All U.S. navigable waters of East Moran Bay within a
700-foot radius from the fireworks launch site at the end of the Arnold
Transit Mill Slip, centered in position: 45[deg]52'24.62'' N,
084[deg]43'18.13'' W [DATUM: NAD 83].
    (ii) Enforcement Period. This safety zone will be enforced each
year on July 4 from 9 p.m. until 11:30 p.m. If the July 4 fireworks are
cancelled due to inclement weather, then this section will be enforced
July 5 from 9 p.m. until 11:30 p.m.
    (6) Mackinac Island Fourth of July Celebration Fireworks; Mackinac
Island, MI:
    (i) Location. All U.S. navigable waters of Lake Huron within a 500-
foot radius of the fireworks launch site, centered approximately 1000
yards west of Round Island Passage Light, at position 45[deg]50'34.92''
N, 084[deg]37'38.16'' W [DATUM: NAD 83].
    (ii) Enforcement Period. This safety zone will be enforced each
year on July 4 from 9 p.m. until 11 p.m. If the July 4 fireworks are
cancelled due to inclement weather, then this section will be enforced
July 5 from 9 p.m. until 11 p.m.
    (7) Festivals of Fireworks Celebration Fireworks; St. Ignace, MI:
    (i) Location. All U.S. navigable waters of East Moran Bay within a
700-foot radius from the fireworks launch site at the end of the Arnold
Transit Mill Slip, centered in position: 45[deg]52'24.62'' N,
084[deg]43'18.13'' W [DATUM: NAD 83].
    (ii) Enforcement Period. This safety zone will be enforced each
year on every Saturday following the 4th of July until the second
Sunday in September from 9 p.m. to 11 p.m. If the fireworks are
cancelled on Saturday due to inclement weather, then this section will
be enforced on Sunday from 9 p.m. to 11 p.m.
    (8) Canada Day Celebration Fireworks; Sault Sainte Marie, MI:
    (i) Location. All U.S. navigable waters of the St. Marys River
within a 1200-foot radius from the fireworks launch site, centered
approximately 160 yards north of the U.S. Army Corp of Engineers Soo
Locks North East Pier, at position 46[deg]30'20.40'' N,
084[deg]20'17.64'' W [DATUM: NAD 83].
    (ii) Enforcement Period. This safety zone will be enforced each
year on July 1 from 9 p.m. until 11 p.m. If the July 1 fireworks are
cancelled due to inclement weather, then this section will be enforced
July 2 from 9 p.m. until 11 p.m.
    (9) Jordan Valley Freedom Festival Fireworks; East Jordan, MI:
    (i) Location. All U.S. navigable waters of Lake Charlevoix, near
the City of East Jordan, within the arc of a circle with a 1000-foot
radius from the fireworks launch site in position 45[deg]09'18'' N,
085[deg]07'48'' W [DATUM: NAD 83].
    (ii) Enforcement Period. Each year on Saturday of the third weekend
of June from 9 p.m. until 11 p.m.
    (10) National Cherry Festival Fourth of July Celebration Fireworks;
Traverse City, MI:
    (i) Location. All U.S. navigable waters of the West Arm of Grand
Traverse Bay within the arc of a circle with a 1000-foot radius from
the fireworks launch site located on a barge in position 44[deg]46'12''
N, 085[deg]37'06'' W [DATUM: NAD 83].
    (ii) Enforcement Period. This safety zone will be enforced each
year on July 4 from 9 p.m. until 11 p.m. If the July 4 fireworks are
cancelled due to inclement weather, then this section will be enforced
July 5 from 9 p.m. until 11 p.m.
    (11) Harbor Springs Fourth of July Celebration Fireworks; Harbor
Springs, MI:
    (i) Location. All U.S. navigable waters of Lake Michigan and Harbor
Springs Harbor within the arc of a circle with a 1000-foot radius from
the fireworks

launch site located on a barge in position 45[deg]25'30'' N,
084[deg]59'06'' W [DATUM: NAD 83].
    (ii) Enforcement Period. This safety zone will be enforced each
year on July 4 from 9 p.m. until 11 p.m. If the July 4 fireworks are
cancelled due to inclement weather, then this section will be enforced
July 5 from 9 p.m. until 11 p.m.
    (12) Bay Harbor Yacht Club Fourth of July Celebration Fireworks;
Petoskey, MI:
    (i) Location. All U.S. navigable waters of Lake Michigan and Bay
Harbor Lake within the arc of a circle with a 500-foot radius from the
fireworks launch site located on a barge in position 45[deg]21'50'' N,
085[deg]01'37'' W [DATUM: NAD 83].
    (ii) Enforcement Period. This safety zone will be enforced each
year on July 3 from 9 p.m. until 11 p.m. If the July 3 fireworks are
cancelled due to inclement weather, then this section will be enforced
July 4 from 9 p.m. until 11 p.m.
    (13) Petoskey Fourth of July Celebration Fireworks; Petoskey, MI:
    (i) Location. All U.S. navigable waters of Lake Michigan and
Petoskey Harbor, in the vicinity of Bay Front Park, within the arc of a
circle with a 1000-foot radius from the fireworks launch site located
in position 45[deg]22'40'' N, 084[deg]57'30'' W [DATUM: NAD 83].
    (ii) Enforcement Period. This safety zone will be enforced each
year on July 4 from 9 p.m. until 11 p.m. If the July 4 fireworks are
cancelled due to inclement weather, then this section will be enforced
July 5 from 9 p.m. until 11 p.m.
    (14) Boyne City Fourth of July Celebration Fireworks; Boyne City,
MI:
    (i) Location. All U.S. navigable waters of Lake Charlevoix, in the
vicinity of Veterans Park, within the arc of a circle with a 1400-foot
radius from the fireworks launch site located in position
45[deg]13'30'' N, 085[deg]01'40'' W [DATUM: NAD 83].
    (ii) Enforcement Period. This safety zone will be enforced each
year on July 4 from 9 p.m. until 11 p.m. If the July 4 fireworks are
cancelled due to inclement weather, then this section will be enforced
July 5 from 9 p.m. until 11 p.m.
    (15) National Cherry Festival Air Show; Traverse City, MI:
    (i) Location. All U.S. navigable waters of the West Arm of Grand
Traverse Bay bounded by a line drawn from 44[deg]46'48'' N,
085[deg]38'18'' W, then southeast to 44[deg]46'30'' N, 085[deg]35'30''
W, then southwest to 44[deg]46'00'' N, 085[deg]35'48'' W, then
northwest to 44[deg]46'30'' N, 085[deg]38'30'' W, then back to the
point of origin [DATUM: NAD 83].
    (ii) Enforcement Period. Each year on Friday, Saturday, and Sunday
of the first complete weekend of July from noon until 4 p.m.
    (16) National Cherry Festival Finale Fireworks; Traverse City, MI:
    (i) Location. All U.S. navigable waters and adjacent shoreline of
the West Arm of Grand Traverse Bay within the arc of a circle with a
1000-foot radius from the fireworks launch site located on a barge in
position 44[deg]46'12'' N, 085[deg]37'06'' W [DATUM: NAD 83].
    (ii) Enforcement Period. Each year on the second Saturday of July
from 9 p.m. until 11 p.m.
    (17) Charlevoix Venetian Festival Friday Night Fireworks;
Charlevoix, MI:
    (i) Location. All U.S. navigable waters of Lake Charlevoix, in the
vicinity of Depot Beach, within the arc of a circle with a 1000-foot
radius from the fireworks launch site located on a barge in position
45[deg]19'08'' N, 085[deg]14'18'' W [DATUM: NAD 83].
    (ii) Enforcement Period. Each year on Friday of the fourth weekend
of July from 9 p.m. until 11 p.m.
    (18) Charlevoix Venetian Festival Saturday Night Fireworks;
Charlevoix, MI:
    (i) Location. All U.S. navigable waters of Round Lake within the
arc of a circle with a 300- foot radius from the fireworks launch site
located on a barge in position 45[deg]19'03'' N, 085[deg]15'18'' W
[DATUM: NAD 83].
    (ii) Enforcement Period. Each year on Saturday of the fourth
weekend of July from 9 p.m. until 11 p.m.
    (19) Elk Rapids Harbor Days Fireworks; Elk Rapids, MI:
    (i) Location. All U.S. navigable waters of Grand Traverse Bay, in
the vicinity of Edward G. Grace Memorial Park, within the arc of a
circle with a 1000-foot radius from the fireworks launch site located
in position 44[deg]53'58'' N, 085[deg]25'04'' W [DATUM: NAD 83].
    (ii) Enforcement Period. Each year on the first Saturday of August
from 9 p.m. until 11 p.m.
    (20) Alpena Fourth of July Celebration Fireworks, Alpena, MI:
    (i) Location. All U.S. navigable waters of Lake Huron within an
800-foot radius of the fireworks launch site located near the end of
Mason Street, South of State Avenue, at position 45[deg]02'42'' N,
083[deg]26'48'' W (NAD 83).
    (ii) Enforcement Period. This safety zone will be enforced each
year on July 4 from 9 p.m. until 11 p.m. If the July 4 fireworks are
cancelled due to inclement weather, then this section will be enforced
July 5 from 9 p.m. until 11 p.m.
    (b) Definitions. The following definitions apply to this section:
    (1) Designated representative means any Coast Guard commissioned,
warrant, or petty officer designated by the Captain of the Port Sault
Sainte Marie to monitor these safety zones, permit entry into these
safety zones, give legally enforceable orders to persons or vessels
within these safety zones, or take other actions authorized by the
Captain of the Port Sault Sainte Marie.
    (2) Public vessel means a vessel owned, chartered, or operated by
the United States or by a State or political subdivision thereof.
    (c) Regulations. (1) In accordance with the general regulations in
Sec.  165.23 of this part, entry into, transiting, or anchoring within
any of the safety zones listed in this section is prohibited unless
authorized by the Captain of the Port Sault Sainte Marie, or a
designated representative.
    (2) All persons and vessels must comply with the instructions of
the Coast Guard Captain of the Port Sault Sainte Marie or a designated
representative. Upon being hailed by the U.S. Coast Guard by siren,
radio, flashing light or other means, the operator of a vessel shall
proceed as directed.
    (3) When a safety zone established by this section is being
enforced, all vessels must obtain permission from the Captain of the
Port Sault Sainte Marie or a designated representative to enter, move
within, or exit that safety zone. Vessels and persons granted
permission to enter the safety zone shall obey all lawful orders or
directions of the Captain of the Port Sault Sainte Marie or a
designated representative. While within a safety zone, all vessels
shall operate at the minimum speed necessary to maintain a safe course.
    (d) Suspension of Enforcement. If the event concludes earlier than
scheduled, the Captain of the Port Sault Sainte Marie or a designated
representative will issue a Broadcast Notice to Mariners notifying the
public that enforcement of the respective safety zone is suspended.
    (e) Exemption. Public vessels, as defined in paragraph (b) of this
section, are exempt from the requirements in this section.
    (f) Waiver. For any vessel, the Captain of the Port Sault Sainte
Marie or a designated representative may, at his or her discretion,
waive any of the requirements of this section, upon finding that
circumstances are such that application of this section is unnecessary
or impractical for the purposes of safety or environmental safety.

    Dated: April 6, 2011.
J.C. McGuiness,
Captain, U.S. Coast Guard, Captain of the Port Sault Sainte Marie.
[FR Doc. 2011-9148 Filed 4-15-11; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 9110-04-P


[Federal Register: October 11, 2005 (Volume 70, Number 195)]
[Notices]
[Page 59065-59066]
[DOCID:fr11oc05-50]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission

Combined Notice of Filings 1

October 3, 2005.
    Take notice that the Commission received the following electric
rate filings.
    Docket Numbers: ER01-931-005; ER05-1178-002; ER01-930-005; ER05-
1191-002.
    Applicants: Entegra Power Group LLC.
    Description: Entegra Power Group LLCfiled a response to FERC's 8/
30/05 deficiency letter.
    Filed Date: 09/28/2005.
    Accession Number: 20050930-0001.
    Comment Date: 5 p.m. eastern time on Wednesday, October 19, 2005.

    Docket Numbers: ER05-1225-003.
    Applicants: New York Industrial Energy Buyers, LLC.
    Description: New York Industrial Energy Buyers, LLC submits an
amendment to its 8/3/05 application for market-based rates.
    Filed Date: 09/28/2005.
    Accession Number: 20050930-0008.
    Comment Date: 5 p.m. eastern time on Wednesday, October 19, 2005.

    Docket Numbers: ER05-1226-002.
    Applicants: New York Commercial Energy Buyers, LLC.
    Description: New York Industrial Energy Buyers, LLC submits an
amendment change to its 8/3/05 application for market-based rates.
    Filed Date: 09/28/2005.
    Accession Number: 20050930-0009.
    Comment Date: 5 p.m. eastern time on Wednesday, October 19, 2005.

    Docket Numbers: ER05-1328-001.
    Applicants: Central Maine Power Company.
    Description: Central Maine Power Co submits a revision to an
unexecuted Local Network Agreements with Newark Group Gardiner
Paperboard.
    Filed Date: 09/28/2005.
    Accession Number: 20050930-0010.
    Comment Date: 5 p.m. eastern time on Wednesday, October 19, 2005.

    Docket Numbers: ER05-1510-000.
    Applicants: Northeast Utilities Service Company.
    Description: Northeast Utilities Service Co on behalf of
Connecticut Light and Power Co et al submits a notice of termination to
the Power Supply Agreement with Princeton Municipal Electric
Department.
    Filed Date: 09/27/2005.
    Accession Number: 20050928-0216.
    Comment Date: 5 p.m. eastern time on Tuesday, October 18, 2005.

    Docket Numbers: ER05-1511-000.
    Applicants: Noble Thumb Windpark I, LLC.
    Description: Noble Thumb Windpark I LLC submits its application for
Order Accepting Initial Rate Schedule, Waiving Regulations, and
Granting Blanket Approvals and Request for Expedited Considerations.
    Filed Date: 09/28/2005.
    Accession Number: 20050930-0005.
    Comment Date: 5 p.m. eastern time on Wednesday, October 19, 2005.
    Docket Numbers: ER05-1512-000.
    Applicants: PJM Interconnection L.L.C.
    Description: PJM Interconnection, LLC submits an executed
interconnection service agreement with Wellington Development-WDVT, LLC
and West Penn Power Co. dba Allegheny Power.
    Filed Date: 09/28/2005.
    Accession Number: 20050930-0014.
    Comment Date: 5 p.m. eastern time on Wednesday, October 19, 2005.
    Docket Numbers: ER05-1514-000.
    Applicants: Southern Company Services, Inc.
    Description: Southern Company Services, Inc on behalf of Southern
Companies submits an informational filing to update FERC Annual Charge
component.
    Filed Date: 09/28/2005.
    Accession Number: 20050930-0012.
    Comment Date: 5 p.m. eastern time on Wednesday, October 19, 2005.

    Docket Numbers: ER05-1515-000.
    Applicants: Texas Retail Energy, LLC.
    Description: Application of Texas Retail Energy LLC for order
accepting market-based rate tariff for filing granting waivers and
blanket approvals.
    Filed Date: 09/28/2005.
    Accession Number: 20050930-0003.
    Comment Date: 5 p.m. eastern time on Wednesday, October 19, 2005.

    Docket Numbers: ER05-651-003.
    Applicants: Southwest Power Pool, Inc.
    Description: Southwest Power Pool, Inc submits a revised version of
the Large Generator Interconnection Agreement with FPL Energy Cowboy
Wind, LLC et al pursuant to Commission Order issued 8/25/05.
    Filed Date: 09/27/2005.
    Accession Number: 20050929-0088.
    Comment Date: 5 p.m. eastern time on Tuesday, October 18, 2005.

    Docket Numbers: ER95-1441-022.
    Applicants: ConocoPhillips Company.
    Description: ConocoPhillips Co submits amended triennial market
power analysis and revision to FERC Electric Tariff No. 1.
    Filed Date: 09/22/2005.
    Accession Number: 20050930-0208.
    Comment Date: 5 p.m. eastern time on Thursday, October 13, 2005.
    Any person desiring to intervene or to protest in any of the above
proceedings must file in accordance with Rules 211 and 214 of the
Commission's Rules of Practice and Procedure (18 CFR 385.211 and
385.214) on or before 5 p.m. Eastern time on the specified comment
date. It is not necessary to separately intervene again in a subdocket
related to a compliance filing if you have previously intervened in the
same docket. Protests will be considered by the Commission in
determining the appropriate action to be taken, but will not serve to
make protestants parties to the proceeding. Anyone filing a motion to
intervene or protest must serve a copy of that document on the
Applicant. In reference to filings initiating a new proceeding,
interventions or protests submitted on or before the comment deadline
need not be served on persons other and the Applicant.
    The Commission encourages electronic submission of protests and
interventions in lieu of paper, using the FERC Online links at http://www.ferc.gov.
 To facilitate electronic service, persons with Internet

access who will eFile a document and/or be listed as a contact for an
intervenor must create and validate an eRegistration account using the
eRegistration link. Select the eFiling link to log on and submit the
intervention or protests.
    Persons unable to file electronically should submit an original and
14 copies of the intervention or protest to the Federal Energy
Regulatory Commission, 888 First St. NE., Washington, DC 20426.
    The filings in the above proceedings are accessible in the
Commission's eLibrary system by clicking on the appropriate link in the
above list. They are also available for review in the Commission's
Public Reference Room in

Washington, DC. There is an eSubscription link on the web site that
enables subscribers to receive e-mail notification when a document is
added to a subscribed dockets(s). For assistance with any FERC Online
service, please e-mail<EMAIL_ADDRESS>or call (866) 208-
3676 (toll free). For TTY, call<PHONE_NUMBER>.

Magalie R. Salas,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. E5-5547 Filed 10-7-05; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 6717-01-P