[Federal Register: September 6, 2007 (Volume 72, Number 172)]
[Proposed Rules]
[Page 51201-51203]
[DOCID:fr06se07-24]

=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION

Federal Aviation Administration

14 CFR Part 39

[Docket No. FAA-2007-29116; Directorate Identifier 2007-NM-064-AD]
RIN 2120-AA64

Airworthiness Directives; Boeing Model 737-600, -700, -700C, -
800, and -900 Series Airplanes

AGENCY: Federal Aviation Administration (FAA), Department of
Transportation (DOT).

ACTION: Notice of proposed rulemaking (NPRM).

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The FAA proposes to adopt a new airworthiness directive (AD)
for all Boeing Model 737-600, -700, -700C, -800, and -900 series
airplanes. This proposed AD would require a one-time inspection to
determine the material of the forward and aft gray water drain masts.
For airplanes having composite gray water drain masts, this proposed AD
would also require installation of a copper bonding jumper between a
ground and the clamp on the tube of the forward and aft gray water
composite drain masts. This proposed AD results from a report of
charred insulation blankets and burned wires around the forward gray
water composite drain mast found during an inspection of the forward
cargo compartment on a Model 767-300F airplane. We are proposing this
AD to prevent a fire near a composite drain mast and possible
disruption of the electrical power system caused by a lightning strike
on a composite drain mast, which could result in the loss of several
functions essential for safe flight.

DATES: We must receive comments on this proposed AD by October 22,
2007.

ADDRESSES: Use one of the following addresses to submit comments on
this proposed AD.
     DOT Docket Web site: Go to http://dms.dot.gov and follow

the instructions for sending your comments electronically.
     Government-wide rulemaking Web site: Go to http://www.regulations.gov
 and follow the instructions for sending your

comments electronically.
     U.S. Department of Transportation, Docket Operations, M-
30, West Building Ground Floor, Room W12-140, 1200 New Jersey Avenue,
SE., Washington, DC 20590.
     Fax:<PHONE_NUMBER>.
     Hand Delivery: Room W12-140 on the ground floor of the
West Building, 1200 New Jersey Avenue, SE., Washington, DC, between 9
a.m. and 5 p.m., Monday through Friday, except Federal holidays.
    Contact Boeing Commercial Airplanes, P.O. Box 3707, Seattle,
Washington 98124-2207, for the service information identified in this
proposed AD.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Marcia Smith, Aerospace Engineer,
Cabin Safety and Environmental Systems Branch, ANM-150S, FAA, Seattle
Aircraft Certification Office, 1601 Lind Avenue, SW., Renton,
Washington 98057-3356; telephone<PHONE_NUMBER>; fax<PHONE_NUMBER>.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

Comments Invited

    We invite you to submit any relevant written data, views, or
arguments regarding this proposed AD. Send your comments to an address
listed in the ADDRESSES section. Include the docket number ``FAA-2007-
29116; Directorate Identifier 2007-NM-064-AD'' at the beginning of your
comments. We specifically invite comments on the overall regulatory,
economic, environmental, and energy aspects of the proposed AD. We will
consider all comments received by the closing date and may amend the
proposed AD in light of those comments.
    We will post all comments we receive, without change, to http://dms.dot.gov
, including any personal information you provide. We will

also post a report summarizing each substantive verbal contact with FAA
personnel concerning this proposed AD. Using the search function of
that Web site, anyone can find and read the comments in any of our
dockets, including the name of the individual who sent the comment (or
signed the comment on behalf of an association, business, labor union,
etc.). You may review DOT's complete Privacy Act Statement in the
Federal Register published on April 11, 2000 (65 FR 19477-78), or you
may visit http://dms.dot.gov.

Examining the Docket

    You may examine the AD docket on the Internet at http://dms.dot.gov
, or in person at the Docket Operations office between 9

a.m. and 5 p.m., Monday through Friday, except Federal holidays. The
Docket Operations office (telephone<PHONE_NUMBER>) is located on the
ground floor of the West Building at the DOT street address stated in
the ADDRESSES section. Comments will be available in the AD docket
shortly after the Docket Management System receives them.

Discussion

    We have received a report indicating that, during an inspection of
the forward cargo compartment on a Model 767-300F airplane, an operator
found charred insulation blankets and burned wires around the forward
gray water composite drain mast. Additional charring on the insulation
blankets was noticed several feet away along the routing of the drain
mast's ground wire and power wires. Analysis of the

damaged parts revealed that a lightning strike on the composite drain
mast caused the damage to the wires and insulation blankets. This
condition, if not corrected, could cause disruption of electrical power
and fire and heat damage to equipment in the event of a lightning
strike on the composite drain mast, which could result in the potential
loss of several functions essential for safe flight.
    A design review of the gray water composite drain mast installation
on Model 737, 757, 767, and 777 airplanes revealed that the
installation of a heavier bonding jumper is necessary to provide
adequate lightning protection to the gray water composite drain mast
installation. The subject area on Model 737-600, -700, -700C, -800, and
-900 airplanes is almost identical to that on the affected Model 767-
300F airplane. Therefore, Model 737-600, -700, -700C, -800, and -900
series airplanes might be subject to the unsafe condition revealed on
the Model 767-300F airplane. We are currently considering additional
rulemaking to address the identified unsafe condition on Model 757,
767, and 777 airplanes.

Relevant Service Information

    We have reviewed Boeing Special Attention Service Bulletin 737-30-
1056, dated February 28, 2007. The service bulletin describes
procedures for installing a 135-ampere copper bonding jumper between a
ground and the clamp on the tube of the forward and aft gray water
composite drain mast.

FAA's Determination and Requirements of the Proposed AD

    We have evaluated all pertinent information and identified an
unsafe condition that is likely to exist or develop on other airplanes
of this same type design. For this reason, we are proposing this AD,
which would require accomplishing the actions specified in the service
information described previously.

Costs of Compliance

    There are about 1,540 airplanes of the affected design in the
worldwide fleet. The following table provides the estimated costs for
U.S. operators to comply with this proposed AD.

                                                                     Estimated Costs
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
                                                                                Number of U.S.-
             Action                    Work hours       Average labor         Parts          Cost per airplane        registered          Fleet cost
                                                        rate per hour                                                 airplanes
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Inspection to determine gray      1..................             $80  None...............  $80................  420................  $33,600.
 water drain mast material.
Installation of bonding jumper..  Between 2 and 4                 $80  Between $7 and $15,  Between $167 and     Up to 420..........  Between $70,140
                                   (depending on                        depending on kit.    $335.                                     and $140,700.
                                   airplane
                                   configuration).
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Authority for This Rulemaking

    Title 49 of the United States Code specifies the FAA's authority to
issue rules on aviation safety. Subtitle I, Section 106, describes the
authority of the FAA Administrator. Subtitle VII, Aviation Programs,
describes in more detail the scope of the Agency's authority.
    We are issuing this rulemaking under the authority described in
Subtitle VII, Part A, Subpart III, Section 44701, ``General
requirements.'' Under that section, Congress charges the FAA with
promoting safe flight of civil aircraft in air commerce by prescribing
regulations for practices, methods, and procedures the Administrator
finds necessary for safety in air commerce. This regulation is within
the scope of that authority because it addresses an unsafe condition
that is likely to exist or develop on products identified in this
rulemaking action.

Regulatory Findings

    We have determined that this proposed AD would not have federalism
implications under Executive Order 13132. This proposed AD would not
have a substantial direct effect on the States, on the relationship
between the national Government and the States, or on the distribution
of power and responsibilities among the various levels of government.
    For the reasons discussed above, I certify that the proposed
regulation:
    1. Is not a ``significant regulatory action'' under Executive Order
12866;
    2. Is not a ``significant rule'' under the DOT Regulatory Policies
and Procedures (44 FR 11034, February 26, 1979); and
    3. Will not have a significant economic impact, positive or
negative, on a substantial number of small entities under the criteria
of the Regulatory Flexibility Act.
    We prepared a regulatory evaluation of the estimated costs to
comply with this proposed AD and placed it in the AD docket. See the
ADDRESSES section for a location to examine the regulatory evaluation.

List of Subjects in 14 CFR Part 39

    Air transportation, Aircraft, Aviation safety, Safety.

The Proposed Amendment

    Accordingly, under the authority delegated to me by the
Administrator, the FAA proposes to amend 14 CFR part 39 as follows:

PART 39--AIRWORTHINESS DIRECTIVES

    1. The authority citation for part 39 continues to read as follows:

    Authority: 49 U.S.C. 106(g), 40113, 44701.

Sec.  39.13  [Amended]

    2. The Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) amends Sec.  39.13 by
adding the following new airworthiness directive (AD):

Boeing: Docket No. FAA-2007-29116; Directorate Identifier 2007-NM-
064-AD.

Comments Due Date

    (a) The FAA must receive comments on this AD action by October
22, 2007.

Affected ADs

    (b) None.

Applicability

    (c) This AD applies to all Boeing Model 737-600, -700, -700C, -
800, and -900 series airplanes, certificated in any category.

Unsafe Condition

    (d) This AD results from a report of charred insulation blankets
and burned wires around the forward gray water composite drain mast
found during an inspection of the forward cargo compartment on a
Model 767-300F airplane. We are issuing this AD to prevent a fire
near a composite drain mast and possible disruption of the
electrical power

system caused by a lightning strike on a composite drain mast, which
could result in the loss of several functions essential for safe
flight.

Compliance

    (e) You are responsible for having the actions required by this
AD performed within the compliance times specified, unless the
actions have already been done.

Inspection To Determine Material of Gray Water Drain Masts

    (f) Within 60 months after the effective date of this AD,
inspect the forward and aft gray water drain masts to determine
whether the drain masts are made of aluminum or composite. A review
of airplane maintenance records is acceptable in lieu of this
inspection if the material of the forward and aft gray water drain
masts can be conclusively determined from that review.
    (1) For any aluminum gray water drain mast identified during the
inspection or records check required by paragraph (f) of this AD, no
further action is required by this paragraph for that drain mast
only.
    (2) For any composite gray water drain mast identified during
the inspection or records check required by paragraph (f) of this
AD, do the actions specified in paragraph (g) of this AD.

Installation of Bonding Jumper

    (g) For any composite gray water drain mast identified during
the inspection or records check required by paragraph (f) of this
AD: Within 60 months after the effective date of this AD, install a
135-ampere copper bonding jumper between a ground and the clamp on
the tube of the gray water composite drain mast, in accordance with
the Accomplishment Instructions of Boeing Special Attention Service
Bulletin 737-30-1056, dated February 28, 2007.

Alternative Methods of Compliance (AMOCs)

    (h)(1) The Manager, Seattle Aircraft Certification Office, FAA,
has the authority to approve AMOCs for this AD, if requested in
accordance with the procedures found in 14 CFR 39.19.
    (2) To request a different method of compliance or a different
compliance time for this AD, follow the procedures in 14 CFR 39.19.
Before using any approved AMOC on any airplane to which the AMOC
applies, notify your appropriate principal inspector (PI) in the FAA
Flight Standards District Office (FSDO), or lacking a PI, your local
FSDO.

    Issued in Renton, Washington, on August 28, 2007.
Stephen P. Boyd,
Acting Manager, Transport Airplane Directorate, Aircraft Certification
Service.
 [FR Doc. E7-17586 Filed 9-5-07; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4910-13-P


November 5, 2010

Camelina:  an Annual Cover Crop Under 40 CFR Part 80 Subpart M

In 40 CFR Part 80, Regulation of Fuels and Fuel Additives, EPA has
designated applicable D codes for use in generating RINs dependent on
feedstock and fuel pathway.  Included as a feedstock are annual cover
crops which are defined as:

“Annual cover crop means an annual crop, planted as a rotation between
primary planted crops, or between trees and vines in orchards and
vineyards, typically to protect soil from erosion and to improve the
soil between periods of regular crops.”

Camelina sativa (camelina) is a flowering plant in the family
Brassicaceae which includes mustard, cabbage, rapeseed, broccoli,
cauliflower, kale, and brussels sprouts. It is native to Northern Europe
and Central Asia and has been grown there for at least 3,000 years.
Camelina is tolerant of low rainfall and needs little nitrogen to
flourish; it can be grown on marginal agricultural lands and does not
compete with, but is a complement to food crops especially dryland wheat
cropping systems. Crop oil yields are double those of soybeans, and it
may be used as a rotation crop for wheat fields to increase the health
of the soil. It is cold tolerant and its oil is more resistant to cold
temperatures than other oils.

Camelina fits the definition of annual cover crop that EPA has put forth
in 40 CFR Part 80 Subpart M and therefore fuel derived from camelina
should qualify for the applicable D codes to generate RINS.  Additional
information on camelina and its attributes is below.

How does camelina fit the definition of an annual cover crop?

 What is the general geographic and agronomic fit for camelina
production?

What nutrients are needed for camelina production?

What are the economics of camelina farming compared to wheat farming and
what is the probability that camelina will take away wheat production?

What is the energy required for camelina production?

Are modifications to existing processing technologies necessary to
process camelina?

Is camelina food?

How does camelina fit the definition of an annual cover crop?

Camelina is an advanced generation biofuel feedstock targeted as a cover
crop complement to dryland food production acres, especially cereals in
the Great Plains. As per the definition above, camelina is:

An annual crop;

Is planted in rotation with dryland wheat – the primary crop;

Protects the soil from erosion as these geographic areas are prone to
wind and rain erosion; and,

Improves the soil between periods as it provides organic matter to
improve soil tilth.

In addition, camelina has the following additional attributes:

Camelina is capable of being planted very early in the season when soil
temperatures are much cooler than other potential crops.  As a result,
the camelina germinates rapidly and shades/chokes out the subsequent
weed germination.

Because it is a 90-110 day crop.  Camelina complements spring wheat
practices by being planted, and harvested earlier than the spring cereal
crop. Cropping and growing practices in farming communities vary widely
based on local conditions, and the same would be true for camelina.
Camelina would be planted as a cover crop to improve land that is
currently left fallow, so its incorporation into a rotation would be
influenced, at least partly, by on-farm conditions, such as a need for
pest control, desire to improve soil tilth and related needs. The below
examples, however, capture a relatively ordinary wheat rotation that is
common throughout the Northern Great Plains, and a standard
wheat/camelina rotation.

In a standard wheat rotation system, winter wheat is planted during the
fall (Year 0), usually in October or November, and is harvested the next
summer, in mid-August of Year 1. After harvest, that strip of land is
left fallow  for the remainder of Year 1, until the spring of Year 2 (as
no-till farming becomes more common, wheat stubble is left standing and
treated with chemicals; hence the term “chemfallow”).  Depending on
farm-specific conditions such as moisture and nutrient levels as well as
the broader farm-wide rotation pattern, that strip of land may either be
seeded with spring wheat in March/April of Year 2, or remain fallow for
an entire 12-month period, until winter wheat planting in the fall of
Year 2. If spring wheat were planted, after August harvest in Year 2,
that strip would then be fallow for an entire 12-month period, August
Year 2-August Year 3.  In fall of Year 3, winter wheat would be seeded
and the rotation begins again.

In a camelina/wheat rotation system, winter wheat is planted during the
fall, as above, and harvested in mid-August of Year 1. That ground would
remain fallow until spring of Year 2, at which point camelina would be
seeded in March or April and harvested in August. That ground would
remain fallow again until spring of Year 3, at which point spring wheat
would be planted. After spring wheat harvest in August of Year 3, winter
wheat would be seeded in October, beginning the rotation again. Note
that, based on moisture conditions in various regions of the country, a
camelina/wheat rotation might require a full year of fallow land. For
example, after the spring wheat harvest in August Year 3, a 12-month
fallow period may be needed before beginning the rotation in the fall of
Year 4, with winter wheat planting.

As fallow acreage is a primary target, camelina as a cover crop replaces
at least two chemical treatments to remove weeds.

What is the general geographic and agronomic fit for camelina
production?

Research conducted since 1997 regarding camelina production in the
United States indicates that the best production fit for the crop is
likely to be as a complement to dryland wheat production systems (McVay
and Lamb, 2008;. Wheeler and Guillen-Portal, 2007, unpublished document;
Ehrensing and Guy, 2008) There are several reasons for this conclusion:

 Economic.  Camelina represents an additional cash crop for dryland
wheat farmers who may not have alternative choices due to marginal
climatic and soil conditions in their production area, by allowing those
producers to grow a dedicated energy feedstock in lieu of idling land.

Economic.  Camelina production utilizes the same equipment necessary to
plant and harvest wheat, so it is not necessary to make significant
capital investment for a wheat farmer to cultivate camelina while the
utilization of the equipment can be amortized against additional
revenues.

Agronomic.  Crop rotation is an essential practice as it allows the
pest/disease cycles to be broken, moisture to be captured, and soil
tilth improved for subsequent crop production.  When an alternative crop
is not available, as in the targeted dryland wheat production acres for
camelina, the rotation is to fallow ground.  Typically in current
production schemes this means that the ground remains as wheat stubble
for a crop season with at least two herbicide applications to kill weeds
that germinate. Farmer’s decisions to rotate from wheat production are
based on a number of factors and include considerations around the
previously mentioned agronomic as well as economic drivers.  In much of
the targeted production area for camelina, where the rotational decision
is commonly fallow (no viable alternative crop), we expect that one of
three rotation scenarios will apply:  1) wheat-fallow-camelina-wheat; 2)
wheat-wheat-fallow-camelina; 3) wheat-wheat-camelina-fallow.  Rotational
choices such as these provide an additional crop within a 4-season
cycle, allowing for up to 40% more revenue in the period from acreage
that is frequently subject to drought, high heat, and other stressors
that make generating revenue challenging. Other rotational minor crops
currently available in the target region include lentils (Lens
culinaris), flax (Linum spp.), peas (Pissum spp.), garbanzo (Cicer
arietinum), and millet (Pennisettum spp.), although the total acreage
devoted to these minor crops is comparatively very small, all of them
together comprising no more than half a million acres of the annually
available rotational acreage in dryland wheat production (estimated to
be up to 20-22 million acres).

Camelina as a complement to dryland wheat production, and a substitute
for fallow land fits generally into the highlighted areas in the map
below.

The acreage potential for camelina is best calculated using the
following from the USDA Agricultural projections:

Wheat plantings to be relatively stable over the next decade. Wheat
plantings are projected to rise to 61.0 million acres in 2011 because of
1) additional land becoming available from expiring CRP contracts and 2)
incentives provided by high expected net returns (expected farm price
times projected yield minus variable costs). The projected farm price is
above the loan rate for the entire projection period, so loan benefits
do not enter into net returns or influence plantings. Plantings are
expected to fall off slightly toward the end of the decade as land is
switched away from wheat to more profitable crops.

As you can see in the chart, the acreage projections during the next
decade for wheat are approximately 60 million acres of production.
Further USDA and wheat state cooperative extension reports through 2008
indicate that 83% of that production is under non-irrigated, dryland
conditions, and of the resulting 50 million acres at least 45 % are
estimated to follow a wheat/fallow rotation. The remaining 55%,
typically in somewhat better agronomic climate and soils, follow a
continuous crop rotation (wheat/barley/wheat; wheat/lentils/wheat, etc.)
  The resulting 22 million acres are therefore the prime target for
camelina production and fall into the previously illustrated geography.
Of those 22 million acres where there is an opportunity to grow
camelina, only about a third, or 9 million acres, have the appropriate
climate, soil profile, and  market access to be economically desirable.

 A commercially viable renewable diesel facility would produce about 75
million gallons of advanced biofuel annually. Approximately 38 million
bushels of camelina per year would be necessary to support that
facility.  Assuming 33 bushels/acre yield, on average, approximately 1.1
million acres of cropland would be necessary for a single facility.
However, renewable diesel facilities, like other advanced biofuel
facilities, will likely choose to use multiple feedstocks to mitigate
risk.

What nutrients are needed for camelina production?

Camelina nutrient and moisture requirements are minimal, significantly
less than wheat or other oilseeds.  As a result, supplemental nutrients
are low, soil moisture is managed and required production costs are low.
Some application of nitrogen and phosphate improves yields.  We advise
farmers to apply 25 pounds of nitrogen per acre and 15 pounds of
phosphate per acre.

What are the economics of camelina farming compared to wheat farming and
what is the probability that camelina will take away wheat production?

The scenario of an open market of camelina competing for acres currently
targeted for cereal production is unlikely.  There are three basic
reasons why:

Cereal markets (wheat, barley especially) represent the opportunity for
much higher return than camelina because there is a significant open
market opportunity for farmers to take advantage of market fluctuations.
 These market fluctuations can mean huge upside for the farmers, as in
2007 and 2008 when wheat prices spiked to over $10/ bushel at times.
Farmers have the opportunity to grow cereals with or without production
contracts.  Conversely, camelina markets as biofuel feedstock sources
will be virtually 100% contracted acres.

Integrated companies with access to biofuel outlets will have economic
incentive to both maintain and lower commodity values to reduce economic
risk and increase predictability of the resulting biofuel.  As such,
camelina is priced such that farmers have economic incentive to plant it
instead of leaving the acres fallow, but would not replace acres
scheduled for wheat rotation with camelina.

Farmers utilize Federal crop insurance for cereal production.  To
maintain their insurance base, farmers must plant annually a specified
percentage of that basis.  Therefore there is a strong incentive not to
plant more than 25% of the cereal crop insurance base for fear of losing
that important risk tool in subsequent years.   Producers must plant at
least 75% of their maximum potential crop acres with the primary crop
– wheat, for example – to maintain the maximum available crop
insurance.  This leaves only 25% of the crop land, which would
ordinarily remain fallow, for planting of camelina.   There is no
similar crop insurance in place for camelina.

A cost comparison of the value to farmer per acre of camelina versus
wheat is below. These cost comparisons are based on Sustainable Oils
production contracts, local seed (agents for Sustainable Oils’ seeds)
who also supply chemicals and fertilizers, farmers accounts provided to
Sustainable Oils, and Chicago Board of Trade wheat quotes.   As one
would expect from a cover crop, the cost per acre to produce camelina is
about 1/3 lower than it is to produce wheat.  The average annual yield
per acre has been trending up but is still less than 800 pounds.
Camelina contracts are paying $0.145 per pound so the expected revenue
per acre is $116, netting the farmer $13.24 per acre.  Wheat contracts
are currently around $5.35 per acre (with yields around 40 bushels per
acre), netting the farmer almost 5x more economic value per wheat acre
than camelina acre.

Camelina yields are expected to improve significantly over the next 5
years.  As this happens, contractors will lower the price paid per pound
in order to gain some of the economic value of creating higher yielding
germplasm, down to about $0.125 per pound.  Even if camelina yields
would increase 50%, to 1200 pounds per acre, the net value to farmers
would still be less ($47.24 per acre – not including extra costs
associated with harvesting and hauling the extra materials) than what is
expected for wheat acreage.

Finally, wheat prices on the open market are relatively volatile.  As
mentioned above, in 2007 and 2008 average wheat prices in Montana for
all types of wheat were $7.14/bu and $6.55/bu respectively (USDA),
although prices spiked much higher than that in different months.  In
these exceptional years, wheat farmers are capable of more than doubling
their net profit.

Camelina Total Production Cost

Wheat

Inputs	Rates	Cost	Cost

Herbicides

Glysophate (Fall)	16 oz. ( $0.39/oz)	$7.00 	$14.00

Glysophate (Spring)	16 oz. ( $0.39/oz)	$7.00

	Post	12 oz ( $0.67/oz)	$8.00

	Seed

Camelina seed	4 pds./acre	$5.76 	$9.00

Fertilizer

Nitrogen Fertilizer	25 pds ( $1/pd)	$25.00 	$90.00

Phosphate Fertilizer	15 pds ( $1/pd)	$15.00

Sub-Total	 	$67.76 	$113.00

Logistics

Planting Trip	 	$10.00 	$10.00

Harvest& Hauling	 	$25.00 	$25.00

Total Cost	 	$102.76 	$148.00

Total Revenue at avg prod/current pricing	$116.00 	$214.00

Return	$13.24 	$66.00

Another scenario that could occur is that oil prices spike, causing
contractors to pay more for camelina while wheat prices drop.  However,
looking at the price of wheat and oil futures contracts during the last
5 years it is apparent that that is an unlikely scenario as wheat and
oil prices are highly correlated.

Wheat Futures Versus Oil Futures 2004-2009

What is the energy required for camelina production?

Camelina production requires minimal energy inputs.  As stated above,
current guidance to farmers is that they apply 25 pounds per acre of
nitrogen and $15 pounds per acre of phosphate. The additional energy
input is diesel for the farming equipment.  Compared to other
feedstocks, the amount of diesel used to plant and harvest camelina
should be the same or less because of the high ratio of seed to biomass
for the plant.

Are modifications to existing processing technologies necessary to
process camelina?

Commercial camelina production has been in place for several years.  An
advantage of camelina production is that the planting and harvesting
equipment used for wheat can be used for camelina and that the existing
crushing, extraction and processing infrastructure is suitable for
camelina.  No modifications to these technologies are necessary.

Is camelina food?

Camelina is most properly understood as a cover crop that complements
existing food crops, such as wheat.  Growing camelina exclusively as a
dedicated energy feedstock, therefore, does not create a “food vs.
fuel” scenario, as camelina has no role in the food chain and only a
small role in the feed chain.

The US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) is responsible for approving
food additives.  There are different routes for this, including being
accepted as GRAS – generally recognized as safe – or going through a
premarket approval process.  Camelina has not received GRAS designation
from the FDA nor has any organization petitioned for it or started a
full approval process. Assuming canola would be the likely predicate
crop for the route to GRAS status by the FDA, it is useful to look at
its history to determine what camelina producers would need to do to
achieve the same status.  Canola was specifically developed in Canada to
provide Canada with a cold tolerant, healthy oilseed crop.  Rapeseed was
the initial crop that was bred to get rid of the anti-nutritional
components of erucic acid and glucosinolates.  The allowable levels of
those two components in canola are less than 2% erucic acid and fewer
than 30 micromoles/ gram glucosinolate.  (Camelina varieties typically
contain over 2% and as much as 4% erucic acid  while glucosinolate
levels vary but can be as high as 36 micromoles/gram.)  Canola, with the
support of the Canadian government and strong trade groups dedicated to
its development, received GRAS status after submission of a lengthy
petition which detailed years of animal and human studies.  It is highly
unlikely that camelina will achieve the same status because (a) there is
not a market need for another cold-tolerant oilseed as canola is a
superior crop with attractive health benefits (b) camelina has an
inferior profile compared to canola because of its erucic acid and
glucosinolate profile (c) the trade groups developing camelina are
focused on it as a energy crop, and (d) camelina oil has an off-odor and
taste and therefore is not a desirable food.  Camelina is not poisonous,
however, and on-line searches may reveal examples of camelina oil being
used in recipes, as one would also find recipes for pennycress,
dandelions and other plants that are not regarded as “food.”

While camelina is not considered food for direct human consumption,
camelina has the potential to add to the food supply because its meal
can be used in some animal feeds.  Camelina meal accounts for ~62% of
the seed (after the oil has been extracted) and while the FDA has
approved its use in beef cattle and broiler hens it is only as a small
percentage of the total ration (10% and 2% respectively).

Summary

Camelina has tremendous potential as a near-term feedstock that can
contribute to reducing our nation’s carbon footprint and increase our
domestic energy supply.  Many of the advantages of camelina are derived
through its use as an annual cover crop, grown by farmers in rotation
with dryland cereal acres.  Camelina provides some economic benefit for
the farmer, protects the soil, and helps reduce the pest cycle.  We
respectfully request that the EPA confirm that camelina is included in
the existing definition of  “annual cover crop” under 40 CFR Part
80, Regulation of Fuels and Fuel Additives.

For further information, please contact Scott Johnson at  HYPERLINK
<EMAIL_ADDRESS><EMAIL_ADDRESS>or
Margaret McCormick at<EMAIL_ADDRESS>
Example A: Ordinary wheat (winter wheat/spring wheat) rotation

 	Jan	Feb 	Mar	April	May	June	July	Aug	Sept	Oct	Nov 	Dec

Year 0	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	WW Planting

Year 1	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	WW Harvest

Year 2	 	 	 	SW Planting	 	 	 	SW Harvest

Year 3	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	WW Planting

Example B: Wheat/camelina rotation

 	Jan	Feb 	Mar	April	May	June	July	Aug	Sept	Oct	Nov 	Dec

Year 0	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	WW Planting

Year 1	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	WW Harvest

Year 2	 	 	 	C Planting	 	 	 	C Harvest

Year 3	 	 	 	SW Planting	 	 	 	SW Harvest	 	WW Planting


[Federal Register Volume 76, Number 70 (Tuesday, April 12, 2011)]
[Notices]
[Pages 20422-20424]
[FR Doc No: 2011-8600]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

[Release No. 34-64209; File No. SR-NYSEArca-2011-14]

Self-Regulatory Organizations; NYSE Arca, Inc.; Notice of Filing
and Immediate Effectiveness of Proposed Rule Change Amending NYSE Arca
Equities Rule 7.11, Trading Pauses in Individual Securities Due to
Extraordinary Market Volatility, To Extend the Effective Date of the
Pilot Until the Earlier of August 11, 2011 or the Date on Which a Limit
Up/Limit Down Mechanism To Address Extraordinary Market Volatility, if
Adopted, Applies

April 6, 2011.
    Pursuant to Section 19(b)(1) \1\ of the Securities Exchange Act of
1934 (the ``Act'') \2\ and Rule 19b-4 thereunder,\3\ notice is hereby
given that on March 31, 2011, NYSE Arca, Inc. (the ``Exchange'' or
``NYSE Arca'') filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the
``Commission'') the proposed rule change as described in Items I and II
below, which Items have been prepared by the Exchange. The Commission
is publishing this notice to solicit comments on the proposed rule
change from interested persons.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \1\ 15 U.S.C.78s(b)(1).
    \2\ 15 U.S.C. 78a.
    \3\ 17 CFR 240.19b-4.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

I. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement of the Terms of Substance
of the Proposed Rule Change

    The Exchange proposes to amend NYSE Arca Equities Rule 7.11, which
provides for trading pauses in individual securities due to
extraordinary market volatility, to extend the effective date of the
pilot by which such rule operates from the current scheduled expiration
date of April 11, 2011, until the earlier of August 11, 2011 or the
date on which a limit up/limit down mechanism to address extraordinary
market volatility, if adopted, applies. The text of the proposed rule
change is available at the Exchange, the Commission's Public Reference
Room, and http://www.nyse.com.

II. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement of the Purpose of, and
Statutory Basis for, the Proposed Rule Change

    In its filing with the Commission, the self-regulatory organization
included statements concerning the purpose of, and basis for, the
proposed rule change and discussed any comments it received

on the proposed rule change. The text of those statements may be
examined at the places specified in Item IV below. The Exchange has
prepared summaries, set forth in sections A, B, and C below, of the
most significant parts of such statements.

A. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement of the Purpose of, and the
Statutory Basis for, the Proposed Rule Change

1. Purpose
    The Exchange proposes to amend NYSE Arca Equities Rule 7.11, which
provides for trading pauses in individual securities due to
extraordinary market volatility, to extend the effective date of the
pilot by which such rule operates from the current scheduled expiration
date of April 11, 2011,\4\ until the earlier of August 11, 2011 or the
date on which a limit up/limit down mechanism to address extraordinary
market volatility, if adopted, applies.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \4\ See Securities Exchange Act Release No. 63496 (December 9,
2010), 75 FR 78285 (December 15, 2010) (SR-NYSEArca-2010-114).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    NYSE Arca Equities Rule 7.11 requires the Exchange to pause trading
in an individual security listed on the Exchange if the price moves by
10% as compared to prices of that security in the preceding five-minute
period during a trading day, which period is defined as a ``Trading
Pause.'' The pilot was developed and implemented as a market-wide
initiative by the Exchange and other national securities exchanges in
consultation with the Commission staff and is currently applicable to
all S&P 500 Index securities, Russell 1000 Index securities, and
specified exchange-traded products.\5\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \5\ The Exchange notes that the other national securities
exchanges and the Financial Industry Regulatory Authority have
adopted the pilot in substantially similar form. See Securities
Exchange Act Release No. 62252 (June 10, 2010), 75 FR 34186 (June
16, 2010) (File Nos. SR-BATS-2010-014; SR-EDGA-2010-01; SR-EDGX-
2010-01; SR-BX-2010-037; SR-ISE-2010-48; SR-NYSE-2010-39; SR-
NYSEAmex-2010-46; SR-NYSEArca-2010-41; SR-NASDAQ-2010-061; SR-CHX-
2010-10; SR-NSX-2010-05; and SR-CBOE-2010-047) and Securities
Exchange Act Release No. 62251 (June 10, 2010), 75 FR 34183 (June
16, 2010) (SR-FINRA-2010-025). See also Securities Exchange Act
Release No. 62884 (September 10, 2010), 75 FR 56618 (September 16,
2010) (File Nos. SR-BATS-2010-018; SR-BX-2010-044; SR-CBOE-2010-065;
SR-CHX-2010-14; SR-EDGA-2010-05; SR-EDGX-2010-05; SR-ISE-2010-66;
SR-NASDAQ-2010-079; SR-NYSE-2010-49; SR-NYSEAmex-2010-63; SR-
NYSEArca-2010-61; and SR-NSX-2010-08 and Securities Exchange Act
Release No. 62883 (September 10, 2010), 75 FR 56608 (September 16,
2010) (SR-FINRA-2010-033).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    The extension proposed herein would allow the pilot to continue to
operate without interruption while the Exchange, other national
securities exchanges and the Commission further assess the effect of
the pilot on the marketplace or whether other initiatives should be
adopted in lieu of the current pilot.
2. Statutory Basis
    The Exchange believes that its proposal is consistent with Section
6(b) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (the ``Act''),\6\ in
general, and furthers the objectives of Section 6(b)(5) of the Act,\7\
in particular, in that it is designed to prevent fraudulent and
manipulative acts and practices, to promote just and equitable
principles of trade, to remove impediments to and perfect the mechanism
of a free and open market and a national market system, and, in
general, to protect investors and the public interest. The Exchange
believes that the change proposed herein meets these requirements in
that it promotes uniformity across markets concerning decisions to
pause trading in a security when there are significant price movements.
Additionally, extension of the pilot until the earlier of August 11,
2011 or the date on which a limit up/limit down mechanism to address
extraordinary market volatility, if adopted, applies would allow the
pilot to continue to operate without interruption while the Exchange
and the Commission further assess the effect of the pilot on the
marketplace or whether other initiatives should be adopted in lieu of
the current pilot.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \6\ 15 U.S.C. 78f(b).
    \7\ 15 U.S.C. 78f(b)(5).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

B. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement on Burden on Competition

    The Exchange does not believe that the proposed rule change will
impose any burden on competition that is not necessary or appropriate
in furtherance of the purposes of the Act.

C. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement on Comments on the Proposed
Rule Change Received From Members, Participants, or Others

    No written comments were solicited or received with respect to the
proposed rule change.

III. Date of Effectiveness of the Proposed Rule Change and Timing for
Commission Action

    Because the foregoing proposed rule change does not: (i)
Significantly affect the protection of investors or the public
interest; (ii) impose any significant burden on competition; and (iii)
become operative for 30 days from the date on which it was filed, or
such shorter time as the Commission may designate if consistent with
the protection of investors and the public interest, it has become
effective pursuant to Section 19(b)(3)(A) of the Act \8\ and Rule 19b-
4(f)(6) thereunder.\9\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \8\ 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(3)(A).
    \9\ 17 CFR 240.19b-4(f)(6). When filing a proposed rule change
pursuant to Rule 19b-4(f)(6) under the Act, an exchange is required
to give the Commission written notice of its intent to file the
proposed rule change, along with a brief description and text of the
proposed rule change, at least five business days prior to the date
of filing of the proposed rule change, or such shorter time as
designated by the Commission. The Commission notes that the Exchange
has satisfied this requirement.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    A proposed rule change filed under Rule 19b-4(f)(6) normally may
not become operative prior to 30 days after the date of filing.\10\
However, Rule 19b-4(f)(6) \11\ permits the Commission to designate a
shorter time if such action is consistent with the protection of
investors and the public interest. The Exchange has requested that the
Commission waive the 30-day operative delay.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \10\ 17 CFR 240.19b-4(f)(6)(iii).
    \11\ Id.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    The Commission has considered the Exchange's request to waive the
30-day operative delay. The Commission believes that waiving the 30-day
operative delay is consistent with the protection of investors and the
public interest, as it will allow the pilot program to continue
uninterrupted, thereby avoiding the investor confusion that could
result from a temporary interruption in the pilot program.\12\ For this
reason, the Commission designates the proposed rule change to be
operative upon filing.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \12\ For the purposes only of waiving the operative delay of
this proposal, the Commission has considered the proposed rule's
impact on efficiency, competition, and capital formation. See 15
U.S.C. 78c(f).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    At any time within 60 days of the filing of the proposed rule
change, the Commission summarily may temporarily suspend such rule
change if it appears to the Commission that such action is necessary or
appropriate in the public interest, for the protection of investors, or
otherwise in furtherance of the purposes of the Act. If the Commission
takes such action, the Commission shall institute proceedings to
determine whether the proposed rule change should be approved or
disapproved.

IV. Solicitation of Comments

    Interested persons are invited to submit written data, views, and
arguments concerning the foregoing, including whether the proposed rule
change, as amended, is consistent with

the Act. Comments may be submitted by any of the following methods:

Electronic Comments

     Use the Commission's Internet comment form (http://www.sec.gov/rules/sro.shtml); or
     Send an e-mail to<EMAIL_ADDRESS>Please include
File Number SR-NYSEArca-2011-14 on the subject line.

Paper Comments

     Send paper comments in triplicate to Elizabeth M. Murphy,
Secretary, Securities and Exchange Commission, 100 F Street, NE.,
Washington, DC 20549-1090.

All submissions should refer to File Number SR-NYSEArca-2011-14. This
file number should be included on the subject line if e-mail is used.
To help the Commission process and review your comments more
efficiently, please use only one method. The Commission will post all
comments on the Commission's Internet Web site (http://www.sec.gov/rules/sro.shtml). Copies of the submission, all subsequent amendments,
all written statements with respect to the proposed rule change that
are filed with the Commission, and all written communications relating
to the proposed rule change between the Commission and any person,
other than those that may be withheld from the public in accordance
with the provisions of 5 U.S.C. 552, will be available for Web site
viewing and printing in the Commission's Public Reference Room, 100 F
Street, NE., Washington, DC 20549, on official business days between
the hours of 10 a.m. and 3 p.m. Copies of such filing also will be
available for inspection and copying at the principal offices of the
Exchange. All comments received will be posted without change; the
Commission does not edit personal identifying information from
submissions. You should submit only information that you wish to make
available publicly.
    All submissions should refer to File Number SR-NYSEArca-2011-14,
and should be submitted on or before May 3, 2011.

    For the Commission, by the Division of Trading and Markets,
pursuant to delegated authority.\13\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \13\ 17 CFR 200.30-3(a)(12).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

Cathy H. Ahn,
Deputy Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2011-8600 Filed 4-11-11; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 8011-01-P


[Federal Register Volume 81, Number 65 (Tuesday, April 5, 2016)]
[Notices]
[Pages 19597-19598]
[FR Doc No: 2016-07722]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission

[Docket No. CP15-492-000]

Dominion Transmission, Inc.; Notice of Availability of the
Environmental Assessment for the Proposed Leidy South Project

    The staff of the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission (FERC or
Commission) has prepared this environmental assessment (EA) for the
Leidy South Project proposed by Dominion Transmission, Inc. (DTI) in
the above-referenced docket. DTI requests authorization to construct,
install, own, operate, and maintain certain facilities located in
Clinton, Franklin, and Centre Counties, Pennsylvania; Frederick County,
Maryland; and Loudoun and Fauquier Counties, Virginia, to provide 0.155
billion cubic feet per day of natural gas and firm transportation
services in the Mid-Atlantic region.
    The EA assesses the potential environmental effects of the
construction and operation of this project in accordance with the
requirements of the National Environmental Policy Act. The FERC staff
concludes that approval of the proposed project, with appropriate
mitigating measures, would not constitute a major federal action
significantly affecting the quality of the human environment.
    DTI's Leidy South Project involves modifications to six existing
DTI compressor stations in Pennsylvania, Maryland, Virginia, and
construction of a new metering and regulating station in Virginia.
Modifications would occur almost entirely on previously disturbed
areas.
    The FERC staff mailed copies of the EA to federal, state, and local
government representatives and agencies; elected officials;
environmental and public interest groups; Native American tribes;
potentially affected landowners and other interested individuals and
groups; newspapers and libraries in the project area; and parties to
this proceeding. In addition, the EA is available for public viewing on
the FERC's Web site (www.ferc.gov) using the eLibrary link. A limited
number of copies of the EA are available for distribution and public
inspection at: Federal Energy Regulatory Commission, Public Reference
Room, 888 First Street NE., Room 2A, Washington, DC 20426, (202) 502-
8371.
    Any person wishing to comment on the EA may do so. Your comments
should focus on the potential environmental effects, reasonable
alternatives, and measures to avoid or lessen environmental impacts.
The more specific your comments, the more useful they will be. To
ensure that the Commission has the opportunity to consider your
comments prior to making its decision on this project, it is important
that we receive your comments in Washington, DC on or before April 29,
2016.
    For your convenience, there are three methods you can use to file
your comments to the Commission. In all instances, please reference the
project docket number (CP15-492-000) with your submission. The
Commission encourages electronic filing of comments and has expert
staff available to assist you at<PHONE_NUMBER> or<EMAIL_ADDRESS>    (1) You can file your comments electronically using the eComment
feature on the Commission's Web site (www.ferc.gov) under the link to
Documents and Filings. This is an easy method for submitting brief,
text-only comments on a project;
    (2) You can also file your comments electronically using the
eFiling feature on the Commission's Web site (www.ferc.gov) under the
link to Documents and Filings. With eFiling, you can provide comments
in a variety of formats by attaching them as a file with your
submission. New eFiling users must first create an account by clicking
on ``eRegister.'' You must select the type of filing you are making. If
you are filing a comment on a particular project, please select
``Comment on a Filing''; or
    (3) You can file a paper copy of your comments by mailing them to
the following address: Kimberly D. Bose, Secretary, Federal Energy
Regulatory Commission, 888 First Street NE., Room 1A, Washington, DC
20426.
    Any person seeking to become a party to the proceeding must file a
motion to intervene pursuant to Rule 214 of the Commission's Rules of
Practice and Procedures (18 CFR 385.214).\1\ Only intervenors have the
right to seek rehearing of the Commission's decision. The Commission
grants affected landowners and others with environmental concerns
intervenor status upon showing good cause by stating that they have a
clear and direct interest in this proceeding which no other party can
adequately represent. Simply filing environmental comments will not
give you intervenor status, but you do not need intervenor status to
have your comments considered.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \1\ See the previous discussion on the methods for filing
comments.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    Additional information about the project is available from the
Commission's Office of External Affairs, at (866) 208-FERC, or on the
FERC Web site (www.ferc.gov) using the eLibrary link. Click on the
eLibrary link, click on ``General Search,'' and enter the docket number
excluding the last three digits in the Docket Number field (i.e., CP15-
492). Be sure you have selected an appropriate date range. For
assistance, please contact FERC Online Support at
<EMAIL_ADDRESS>or toll free at<PHONE_NUMBER>, or for TTY,
contact<PHONE_NUMBER>. The eLibrary link also provides access to the
texts of formal documents issued by the Commission,

such as orders, notices, and rulemakings.
    In addition, the Commission offers a free service called
eSubscription which allows you to keep track of all formal issuances
and submittals in specific dockets. This can reduce the amount of time
you spend researching proceedings by automatically providing you with
notification of these filings, document summaries, and direct links to
the documents. Go to www.ferc.gov/docs-filing/esubscription.asp.

    Dated: March 30, 2016.
Nathaniel J. Davis, Sr.,
Deputy Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2016-07722 Filed 4-4-16; 8:45 am]
 BILLING CODE 6717-01-P


[Federal Register Volume 78, Number 57 (Monday, March 25, 2013)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Pages 17866-17868]
[FR Doc No: 2013-06748]

=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES

Food and Drug Administration

21 CFR Parts 510, 522, 524, and 529

[Docket No. FDA-2013-N-0002]

New Animal Drug Approvals; Change of Sponsor; Change of Sponsor's
Drug Labeler Code; Gonadorelin Acetate; Isoflurane; Praziquantel;
Propofol; Sevoflurane; Triamcinolone Acetonide

AGENCY: Food and Drug Administration, HHS.

ACTION: Final rule.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Food and Drug Administration (FDA) is amending the animal
drug regulations to reflect approval actions for new animal drug
applications (NADAs) and abbreviated new animal drug applications
(ANADAs) during January 2013. FDA is also informing the public of the
availability of summaries the basis of approval and of environmental
review documents, where applicable. The animal drug regulations are
also being amended to reflect changes of sponsorship for an NADA and
ANADA, and a change of a sponsor's drug labeler code.

DATES: This rule is effective March 25, 2013.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: George K. Haibel, Center for
Veterinary Medicine (HFV-6), Food and Drug Administration, 7519
Standish Pl., Rockville, MD 20855,<PHONE_NUMBER>, email:
<EMAIL_ADDRESS>
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: FDA is amending the animal drug regulations
to reflect approval actions for NADAs and ANADAs during January 2013,
as listed in table 1. In addition, FDA is informing the public of the
availability, where applicable, of documentation of environmental
review required under the National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA) and,
for actions requiring review of safety or effectiveness data, summaries
of the basis of approval (FOI Summaries) under the Freedom of
Information Act (FOIA). These public documents may be seen in the
Division of Dockets Management (HFA-305), Food and Drug Administration,
5630

Fishers Lane, rm. 1061, Rockville, MD 20852, between 9 a.m. and 4 p.m.,
Monday through Friday. Persons with access to the Internet may obtain
these documents through the Center for Veterinary Medicine's (CVM's)
FOIA Electronic Reading Room at http://www.fda.gov/AboutFDA/CentersOffices/OfficeofFoods/CVM/CVMFOIAElectronicReadingRoom/default.htm.
    In addition, FDA is amending the animal drug regulations to reflect
changes of sponsorship for an NADA and ANADA, and a change of a
sponsor's drug labeler code.
    RMS Laboratories, Inc., 1903 East First St., Vidalia, GA 30474, has
informed FDA that it has transferred ownership of, and all rights and
interest in, NADA 141-210 for GENESIS (triamcinolone acetonide) Topical
Spray to Virbac AH, Inc., 3200 Meacham Blvd., Ft. Worth, TX 76137.
Following this change of sponsorship, RMS Laboratories, Inc., will no
longer be the sponsor of an approved application.
    Teva Animal Health, Inc., 3915 South 48th Street Ter., St. Joseph,
MO 64503, has informed FDA that it has transferred ownership of, and
all rights and interest in, ANADA 200-176 for PRAZITECH (praziquantel)
Injectable Solution to Cross Vetpharm Group Ltd., Broomhill Rd.,
Tallaght, Dublin 24, Ireland.
    Abbott Laboratories, North Chicago, IL 60064, has informed FDA of a
change in drug labeler code. Accordingly, the Agency is amending the
regulations in 21 CFR 510.600 to reflect this change of drug labeler
code and to remove entries for RMS Laboratories, Inc., and in 21 CFR
parts 522 and 529 to make conforming changes to Abbott Laboratories'
product listings.
    This rule does not meet the definition of ``rule'' in 5 U.S.C.
804(3)(A) because it is a rule of ``particular applicability.''
Therefore, it is not subject to the congressional review requirements
in 5 U.S.C. 801-808.

                                    Table 1--Original and Supplemental NADAs and ANADAs Approved During January 2013
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
                                                       New animal drug                                21 CFR        FOIA
       NADA/ANADA                 Sponsor               product name               Action            Section      Summary            NEPA Review
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
200-541.................  Parnell Technologies     GONABREED (gonadorelin  1. Original approval       522.1073          yes  1. CE \2\
                           Pty. Ltd., unit 4, 476   acetate) Injectable     as a generic copy of                             2. EA/FONSI \3\
                           Gardeners Rd.,           Solution.               NADA 098-379; and.
                           Alexandria, New South                           2. Supplemental
                           Wales 2015, Australia.                           approval for use with
                                                                            cloprostenol sodium
                                                                            to synchronize
                                                                            estrous cycles to
                                                                            allow for fixed time
                                                                            artificial
                                                                            insemination in
                                                                            lactating dairy cows
                                                                            and beef cows.\1\.
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
\1\ Supplemental approval under section 512(b)(1) of the Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act.
\2\ The Agency has determined under 21 CFR 25.33 that this action is categorically excluded (CE) from the requirement to submit an environmental
  assessment (EA) or an environmental impact statement (EIS) because it is of a type that does not individually or cumulatively have a significant
  effect on the human environment.
\3\ Based on its review of an EA submitted by the sponsor, the Agency has concluded that this action will not have a significant impact on the human
  environment and that an EIS is not required. A finding of no significant impact (FONSI) has been prepared.

List of Subjects

21 CFR Part 510

    Administrative practice and procedure, Animal drugs, Labeling,
Reporting and recordkeeping requirements.

21 CFR Parts 522, 524, and 529

    Animal drugs.

    Therefore, under the Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act and under
authority delegated to the Commissioner of Food and Drugs and
redelegated to the Center for Veterinary Medicine, 21 CFR parts 510,
522, 524, and 529 are amended as follows:

PART 510--NEW ANIMAL DRUGS

0
1. The authority citation for 21 CFR part 510 continues to read as
follows:

    Authority:  21 U.S.C. 321, 331, 351, 352, 353, 360b, 371, 379e.

0
2. Amend Sec.  510.600 as follows:
0
a. In the table in paragraph (c)(1), revise the entry for ``Abbott
Laboratories'' and remove the entry for ``RMS Laboratories, Inc.''; and
0
b. In the table in paragraph (c)(2), remove the entries for ``000074''
and ``067292'' and add an entry for ``000044'' in numerical order.
    The addition and revision read as follows:

Sec.  510.600  Names, addresses, and drug labeler codes of sponsors of
approved applications.

* * * * *
    (c) * * *
    (1) * * *

------------------------------------------------------------------------
                                                           Drug labeler
                 Firm name and address                         code
------------------------------------------------------------------------

                                * * * * *
Abbott Laboratories, North Chicago, IL 60064...........           000044

                                * * * * *
------------------------------------------------------------------------

     (2) * * *

------------------------------------------------------------------------
           Drug labeler code                  Firm name and address
------------------------------------------------------------------------

                                * * * * *
000044................................  Abbott Laboratories, North
                                         Chicago, IL 60064.

                                * * * * *
------------------------------------------------------------------------

PART 522--IMPLANTATION OR INJECTABLE DOSAGE FORM NEW ANIMAL DRUGS

0
3. The authority citation for 21 CFR part 522 continues to read as
follows:

    Authority: 21 U.S.C. 360b.

0
4. Add Sec.  522.1073 to read as follows:

Sec.  522.1073  Gonadorelin acetate.

    (a) Specifications. Each milliliter of solution contains 100
micrograms ([micro]g) of gonadorelin as gonadorelin acetate.
    (b) Sponsor. See No. 068504 in Sec.  510.600(c) of this chapter.

    (c) Conditions of use in cattle--(1) Indications for use and
amounts.
    (i) For the treatment of ovarian follicular cysts in dairy cattle.
Administer 100 [micro]g gonadorelin by intramuscular or intravenous
injection.
    (ii) For use with cloprostenol sodium to synchronize estrous cycles
to allow for fixed-time artificial insemination in lactating dairy cows
and beef cows. Administer to each cow 100 [micro]g gonadorelin by
intramuscular injection, followed 6 to 8 days later by 500 [micro]g
cloprostenol by intramuscular injection, followed 30 to 72 hours later
by 100 [micro]g gonadorelin by intramuscular injection.
    (2) Limitations. Federal law restricts this drug to use by or on
the order of a licensed veterinarian.

0
5. In Sec.  522.1077, revise the section heading to read as set forth
below; and in paragraph (c)(3), remove the first sentence.

Sec.  522.1077  Gonadorelin hydrochloride.

* * * * *

Sec.  522.1078  [Redesignated as Sec.  522.1075]

0
6. Redesignate Sec.  522.1078 as Sec.  522.1075.
0
7. In Sec.  522.1870, revise the section heading and paragraphs (b),
(c)(1)(iii), and (c)(2)(iii) to read as follows:

Sec.  522.1870  Praziquantel.

* * * * *
    (b) Sponsors. See Nos. 000859 and 061623 in Sec.  510.600(c) of
this chapter.
    (c) * * *
    (1) * * *
    (iii) Limitations. Federal law restricts this drug to use by or on
the order of a licensed veterinarian.
    (2) * * *
    (iii) Limitations. Federal law restricts this drug to use by or on
the order of a licensed veterinarian.

Sec.  522.2005  [Amended]

0
8. In paragraph (b)(2) of Sec.  522.2005, remove ``000074'' and in its
place add ``000044''.

PART 524--OPHTHALMIC AND TOPICAL DOSAGE FORM NEW ANIMAL DRUGS

0
9. The authority citation for 21 CFR part 524 continues to read as
follows:

    Authority: 21 U.S.C. 360b.

Sec.  524.2482  [Amended]

0
10. In paragraph (b) of Sec.  524.2482, remove ``067292'' and in its
place add ``051311''.

PART 529--CERTAIN OTHER DOSAGE FORM NEW ANIMAL DRUGS

0
11. The authority citation for 21 CFR part 529 continues to read as
follows:

    Authority: 21 U.S.C. 360b.

Sec.  529.1186  [Amended]

0
12. In paragraph (b) of Sec.  529.1186, remove ``000074'' and in its
place add ``000044''.

Sec.  529.2150  [Amended]

0
13. In paragraph (b) of Sec.  529.2150, remove ``000074'' and in its
place add ``000044''.

    Dated: March 20, 2013.
Bernadette Dunham,
Director, Center for Veterinary Medicine.
[FR Doc. 2013-06748 Filed 3-22-13; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4160-01-P


[Federal Register Volume 79, Number 191 (Thursday, October 2, 2014)]
[Notices]
[Page 59488]
[FR Doc No: 2014-23427]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission

[Docket No. RD14-7-000]

North American Electric Reliability Corporation, Errata Notice

    On June 19, 2014, the Commission issued an ``Order Approving
Reliability Standard'' in the above-captioned proceeding. North
American Electric Reliability Corporation, 147 FERC ] 61,226 (2014)
(June 19 Order). Subsequently, on August 29, 2014, the Commission
issued a ``Commission Information Collection Activities (FERC-725Y);
Comment Request'' associated with approval of the June 19 Order.
(August 29 Comment Request).
    This errata notice serves to correct paragraphs 32 and 33 of the
June 19 Order, and to make corresponding corrections in the August 29
Comment Request. In paragraph 32 of the June 19 Order, the phrase
``approximately 387 entities'' is deleted and replaced with the phrase
``no more than 1,266 entities'' so that the last sentence of paragraph
32 reads as follows:
    ``The number of unique entities responding will be no more than
1,266 entities registered as a reliability coordinator, balancing
authority, transmission operator, transmission owner, or generator
operator.''

The same correction is made in the paragraph titled ``Estimate of
Annual Burden \3\'' of the August 29 Comment Request.

    In addition, the second (non-heading) row of the chart in paragraph
33 of the June 19 Order labelled ``(One-time) Development of a training
program [R5]'' is deleted and replaced with the following:
    ``(One-Time) Development of a training program [R5--13 hrs.] & (on-
going) record retention [M5 and C.1.2--2 hrs.].''

The same correction is made to the chart following the paragraph titled
``Estimate of Annual Burden \3\'' of the August 29 Comment Request.

    Dated: September 25, 2014.
Nathaniel J. Davis, Sr.,
Deputy Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2014-23427 Filed 10-1-14; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6717-01-P


[Federal Register Volume 76, Number 165 (Thursday, August 25, 2011)]
[Notices]
[Pages 53166-53168]
[FR Doc No: 2011-21674]

=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION

Federal Aviation Administration

Public Notice for Waiver of Aeronautical Land-Use Assurance; Lake
in the Hills Airport, Lake in the Hills, IL

AGENCY: Federal Aviation Administration, DOT.

ACTION: Notice of intent of waiver with respect to land.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) is considering a
proposal to change a portion of airport land from aeronautical use to
non-aeronautical use and to authorize the sale of the airport property.
The proposal consists of portions of Parcels 4, 5 and 6, totaling
10.688 acres, and an easement on a 0.88-acre portion of Parcel 5.
Presently the land is vacant and used as open land for control of FAR
Part 77 surfaces and compatible land use and is not needed for
aeronautical use, as shown on the Airport Layout Plan. The Parcels were
acquired with Federal participation. It is the intent of the Village of
Lake in the Hills, as owner and operator of the Lake in the Hills
Airport (3CK) to sell portions of Parcels 4, 5 & 6 (10.688 Acres) in
fee to the City of Crystal Lake, McHenry County Division of
Transportation (McHDOT), and McHenry County Conservation District
(MCCD), based on local jurisdiction, for the relocation of Pyott Road.
3CK would also grant a permanent easement for utilities to the City of
Crystal Lake (0.88 acres). 3CK would, in return, receive the 15.838
acres of land, in fee, from the City of Crystal Lake, McHDOT and MCCD.
This notice announces that the FAA is considering the proposal to
authorize the disposal of the subject airport property at the Lake in
the Hills Airport, Lake in the Hills, IL. Approval does not constitute
a commitment by the FAA to financially assist in disposal of the
subject airport property nor a determination that all measures covered
by the program are eligible for grant-in-aid funding from the FAA. The
disposition of proceeds from the disposal of the airport property will
be in accordance with FAA's Policy and Procedures Concerning the Use of
Airport Revenue, published in the Federal Register on February 16,
1999.
    In accordance with section 47107(h) of Title 49, United States
Code, this notice is required to be published in the Federal Register
30 days before modifying the land-use assurance that requires the
property to be used for an aeronautical purpose.

DATES: Comments must be received on or before September 26, 2011.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Richard Pur, Program Manager, 2300
East Devon Avenue, Des Plaines, IL 60018. Telephone Number 847-294-
7527/FAX Number<PHONE_NUMBER>. Documents reflecting this FAA action may
be reviewed at this same location by appointment or at the Lake in the
Hills Airport, 8407 Pyott Road, Lake in the Hills, IL 60156.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Following is a legal description of the
property located in McHenry County, Illinois, and described as follows:

Portion of Parcel 5 (to Crystal Lake)

    That part of the Northwest Quarter of Section 16, Township 43
North, Range 8 East of the Third Principal Meridian, McHenry County,
Illinois, more particularly described as follows:
    Commencing at the Northwest Corner of said Section 16, thence
South 0[deg]-37'-12'' East (bearings assumed for description
purposes only) along the west line of said Northwest Quarter 584.34
feet to a point on the north line of the parcel described in
Trustee's Deed dated July 26, 2007, and recorded August 7, 2007, as
Document No. 2007R0053990; thence North 89[deg]-22'-48'' East along
said north line 155.07 feet to be the Point of Beginning of the
Parcel to be described;
    From the Point of Beginning, thence continuing North 89[deg]-
22'-48'' East along said north line 21.88 feet; thence South
23[deg]-18'-28'' East 90.77 feet; thence along a curve to the left
an arc distance of 242.62 feet, said curve having a radius of 875.00
feet and a chord bearing South 24[deg]-42'-06'' East 241.85 feet;
thence South 32[deg]-38'-43'' East 560.59 feet; thence along a curve
to the right an arc distance of 763.82 feet, said curve having a
radius of 1,065.00 feet and a chord bearing of South 12[deg]-05'-
56'' East 747.55 feet; thence South 8[deg]-26'-51'' West 293.12
feet; thence along a curve to the left an arc distance of 35.84
feet, said curve having a radius of 180.00 feet and a chord bearing
of South 2[deg]-44'-37'' West 35.78 feet; thence North 70[deg]-50'-
49'' West 21.41 feet; thence along a curve to the right an arc
distance of 31.76 feet, said curve having a radius of 200.00 feet
and a chord bearing North 3[deg]-53'-55'' East 31.72 feet; thence
North 8[deg]-26'-51'' East 293.12 feet; thence along a curve to the
left an arc distance of 749.48 feet, said curve having a radius of
1045.00 feet and a chord bearing North 12[deg]-05'-56'' West 733.52
feet; thence North 32[deg]-38'-43'' West 560.59 feet; thence along a
curve to the right an arc distance of 255.50 feet, said curve having
a radius of 895.00 feet and a chord bearing North 24[deg]-28'-01''
West 254.63 feet; thence North 23[deg]-18'-28'' East 89.14 feet to
the Point of Beginning.
    Said Sub-Parcel contains 0.911 acres, more or less.

Portion of Parcel 5 (Easement to Crystal Lake)

    That Part of the Northwest Quarter of Section 16, Township 43
North, Range 8 East

of the Third Principal Meridian, McHenry County, Illinois, more
particularly described as follows:
    Commencing at the West Quarter Corner of said Section 16, thence
North 89[deg]-54'-22'' East (bearings assumed for description
purposes only) along the south line of said Northwest Quarter 306.71
feet to the Point of Beginning of the Utility Easement to be
described;
    From the Point of Beginning, thence continuing North 89[deg]-
54'-22'' East along said south line 21.18 feet; thence North
19[deg]-09'-01'' East 450.10 feet; thence along a curve to the left
an arc distance of 813.60 feet, said curve having a radius of 900.00
feet and a chord bearing North 6[deg]-44'-51'' West 786.18 feet;
thence North 32[deg]-38'-43'' West 560.59 feet; thence along a curve
to the right an arc distance of 115.82 feet to a point on the east
right of way line of the existing Pyott Road as described in
Trustee's Deed dated July 27, 1993, and recorded August 16, 1993, as
Document No. 93R048243, said curve having a radius of 1040.00 feet
and a chord bearing North 29[deg]-27'-18'' West 115.76 feet; thence
South 0[deg]-30'-01'' West along said east right of way line 42.88
feet; thence along a curve to the left an arc distance of 79.75
feet, said curve having a radius of 1,060.00 feet and a chord
bearing South 30[deg]-29'-23'' East 79.73 feet; thence South
32[deg]-38'-43'' East 560.59 feet; thence along a curve to the right
an arc distance of 795.52 feet, said curve having a radius of 880.00
feet and a chord bearing of South 6[deg]-44'-51'' East 768.71 feet;
thence South 19[deg]-09'-01'' West 457.08 feet to the Point of
Beginning.
    Said Utility Easement contains 0.880 acres, more or less.

Portion of Parcels 5 & 6 (to MCCD)

    That part of the Northwest Quarter of Section 16, Township 43
North, Range 8 East of the Third Principal Meridian, McHenry County,
Illinois, more particularly described as follows:
    Commencing at the Northwest Corner of said Section 16, thence
South 0[deg]-37'-12'' East (bearings assumed for description
purposes only) along the west line of said Northwest Quarter 371.48
feet; thence North 89[deg]-22'-48'' East 50.60 feet to a point on
the east right of way line of Pyott Road as described in Trustee's
Deed dated July 27, 1993, and recorded August 16, 1993, as Document
No. 93R048243, said point being on a line parallel with and 25.00
feet, measured perpendicular, west of the east line of the parcel
described in Trustee's Deed dated May 12, 2008, and recorded May 16,
2008, as Document No. 2008R0028725, said point to be the Point of
Beginning of the Parcel to be described;
    From the Point of Beginning, thence South 0[deg]-37'-12'' East
along said parallel line and east right of way line 57.03 feet;
thence southerly along a curve to the left an arc distance of 63.92
feet, said curve being concentric with and 25.00 feet, measured
radial, west of the east line of the parcel described in Trustee's
Deed dated May 12, 2008, and recorded May 16, 2008, as Document No.
2008R0028725, said curve having a radius of 333.67 feet and a chord
bearing South 6[deg]-06'-29'' East 63.82 feet; thence continuing
along said parallel line South 11[deg]-35'-45'' East 94.02 feet to a
point on the north line of the parcel described in Trustee's Deed
dated July 26, 2007, and recorded August 7, 2007, as Document No.
2007R0053990; thence North 89[deg]-22'-48'' East along said north
line 0.11 feet; thence southeasterly along a curve to the left an
arc distance of 353.17 feet, said curve having a radius of 920.00
feet and a chord bearing South 21[deg]-38'-53'' East 351.00 feet;
thence South 32[deg]-38'-43'' East 560.59 feet; thence southerly
along a curve to the right an arc distance of 731.55 feet, said
curve having a radius of 1,020.00 feet and a chord bearing of South
12[deg]-05'-56'' East 715.97 feet; thence South 8[deg]-26'-51'' West
293.12 feet; thence easterly along a curve to the left an arc
distance of 388.05 feet, said curve having a radius of 225.00 feet
and a chord bearing South 40[deg]-57'-37'' East 341.71 feet; thence
North 89[deg]-38'-04'' East 281.07 feet; thence North 75[deg]-43'-
28'' East 86.21 feet to a point on the west right of way line of the
former Chicago & Northwestern Railroad Company; thence North
19[deg]-14'-01'' West along said west line 25.09 feet; thence South
75[deg]-43'-28'' West 80.99 feet; thence South 89[deg]-38'-04'' West
278.02 feet; thence westerly along a curve to the right an arc
distance of 344.93 feet, said curve having a radius of 200.00 feet
and a chord bearing North 40[deg]-57'-37'' West 303.74 feet; thence
North 8[deg]-26'-51'' East 293.12 feet; thence northerly along a
curve to the left an arc distance of 749.48 feet, said curve having
a radius of 1045.00 feet and a chord bearing North 12[deg]-05'-56''
West 733.52 feet; thence North 32[deg]-38'-43'' West 560.59 feet;
thence northerly along a curve to the right an arc distance of
255.50 Feet, said curve having a radius of 895.00 feet and a chord
bearing North 24[deg]-28'-01'' West 254.63 feet; thence North
23[deg]-18'-28'' East 89.14 feet, to a point on said north line;
thence South 89[deg]-22'-48'' West along said north line 55.00 feet
to a point on said east line; thence North 11[deg]-35'-45'' West
along said east line 98.87 feet; thence continuing along said east
line along a curve to the right an arc distance of 59.13 feet, said
curve having a radius of 308.67 feet and a chord bearing North
6[deg]-06'-29'' West 59.04 feet; thence North 0[deg]-37'-12'' West
continuing along said east line 57.03 feet; thence South 89[deg]-
22'-48'' West 25.00 feet to the Point of Beginning.
    Said Sub-Parcels contain 1.708 acres, more or less.

Portion of Parcels 4, 5 & 6 (to McHDOT)

    That part of the West Half of Section 16, Township 43 North,
Range 8 East of the Third Principal Meridian, McHenry County,
Illinois, more particularly described as follows:
    Commencing at the Northwest Corner of said Section 16, thence
South 0[deg]-37'-12'' East (bearings assumed for description
purposes only) along the west line of said Northwest Quarter 428.51
feet; thence North 89[deg]-22'-48'' East 50.60 feet to a point on
the east right of way line of the existing Pyott Road as described
in Trustee's Deed dated July 27, 1993, and recorded August 16, 1993,
as Document No. 93R048243, said point being on a line parallel with
and 25.00 feet, measured perpendicular, west of the east line of the
parcel described in Trustee's Deed dated May 12, 2008, and recorded
May 16, 2008, as Document No. 2008R0028725, said point to be the
Point of Beginning of the Right of Way Parcel to be described;
    From the Point of Beginning, thence along a curve to the left an
arc distance of 63.92 feet, said curve being concentric with and
25.00 feet, measured radial west of the east line of the parcel
described in Trustee's Deed dated May 12, 2008, and recorded May 16,
2008, as Document No. 2008R0028725, said curve having a radius of
333.67 feet and a chord bearing South 6[deg]-06'-29'' East 63.82
feet; thence continuing along said parallel line South 11[deg]-35'-
45'' East 94.02 feet to a point on the north line of the parcel
described in Trustee's Deed dated July 26, 2007, and recorded August
7, 2007, as Document No. 2007R0053990; thence North 89[deg]-22'-48''
East along said north line 0.11 feet; thence along a curve to the
left an arc distance of 353.17 feet, said curve having a radius of
920.00 feet and a chord bearing South 21[deg]-38'-53'' East 351.00
feet; thence South 32[deg]-38'-43'' East 560.59 feet; thence along a
curve to the right an arc distance of 922.08 feet, said curve having
a radius of 1,020.00 feet and a chord bearing of South 6[deg]-44'-
51'' East 891.00 feet; thence South 19[deg]-09'-01'' West 559.99
feet; thence along a curve to the left an arc distance of 685.36
feet, said curve having a radius of 905.00 feet and a chord bearing
of South 2[deg]-32'-42'' East 669.10 feet; thence South 24[deg]-14'-
25'' East 79.34 feet to a point on the east line of the parcel
described in Warranty Deed dated September 12, 2007, and recorded
September 18, 2007, as Document No. 2007R0063395; thence South
0[deg]-02'-03'' East along said east line 25.04 feet to the
southeast corner of said parcel; thence South 89[deg]-54'-22'' West
along the south line of said parcel 55.08 feet to a point on
centerline of Pyott Road; thence North 24[deg]-24'-53'' West along
said centerline 501.65 feet; thence North 65[deg]-35'-07'' East
33.00 feet to a point on said east right of way line; thence along a
non-tangential curve to the right an arc distance of 341.20 feet,
said curve having a radius of 1025.00 feet and a chord bearing North
9[deg]-36'-51'' East 339.63 feet; thence North 19[deg]-09'-01'' East
559.99 feet; thence along a curve to the left an arc distance of
813.60 feet, said curve having a radius of 900.00 feet and a chord
bearing North 6[deg]-44'-51'' West 786.18 feet; thence North
32[deg]-38'-43'' West 560.59 feet; thence along a curve to the right
an arc distance of 115.82 feet to a point on said east right of way
line of Pyott Road, said curve having a radius of 1040.00 feet and a
chord bearing North 29[deg]-27'-18'' West 115.76 feet; thence North
0[deg]-30'-01'' East along said east right of way line 383.68 feet;
thence North 0[deg]-37'-12'' West continuing along said east right
of way line 62.07 feet to the Point of Beginning.
    Said Right of Way Parcel, identified as Sub-Parcels contains
8.070 acres, more or less.

    Issued in Des Plaines, Illinois on July 18, 2011.
Jim Keefer,
Manager, Chicago Airports District Office, FAA, Great Lakes Region.
[FR Doc. 2011-21674 Filed 8-23-11; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910-13-P


[Federal Register Volume 84, Number 83 (Tuesday, April 30, 2019)]
[Notices]
[Page 18340]
[FR Doc No: 2019-08729]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION

National Highway Traffic Safety Administration

[Docket No. NHTSA-2018-0094]

Agency Information Collection Activities; Submission to the
Office of Management and Budget for Review and Approval; Request for
Comment; Fatality Analysis Reporting System; Correction

AGENCY: National Highway Traffic Safety Administration (NHTSA),
Department of Transportation (DOT).

ACTION: Notice; correction.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The National Highway Traffic Safety Administration (NHTSA)
published a document in the Federal Register of April 25, 2019,
concerning request for comments on an information collection for
NHTSA's Fatality Analysis Reporting System. The document contained
incorrect burden estimates.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: For additional information, contact
Barbara Rhea, State Data Reporting Systems Division (NSA-120), Room
W53-304, 1200 New Jersey Avenue SE, Washington, DC 20590. Ms. Rhea can
be reached via email at [email protected] or via phone at 202-366-
2714.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

Correction

    This notice is to correct burden hour estimates included in a
notice requesting comments on an Information Collection (84 FR 17449).
In the Federal Register of April 25, 2019, in FR Doc. 2019-08340, on
page 17450, in the first column, correct ``Estimated Total Annual
Burden Hours: 104,244 hours'' to ``Estimated Total Annual Burden Hours:
106,244 hours'' and, at the end of the paragraph directly under
``Estimated Total Annual Burden Hours: 106,244 hours,'' add, ``However,
the States' overhead cost include on average 2,000 hours spent by
supervisors responding to FARS that are not counted in the coding hours
every year. Thus, the total estimated annual burden is 106,244 hours.''

    Issued in Washington, DC.
Cem Hatipoglu,
Acting Associate Administrator for the National Center for Statistics
and Analysis.
[FR Doc. 2019-08729 Filed 4-29-19; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910-59-P