[Federal Register Volume 82, Number 144 (Friday, July 28, 2017)]
[Notices]
[Pages 35259-35260]
[FR Doc No: 2017-15489]

=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION

Federal Aviation Administration

Membership in the National Parks Overflights Advisory Group

AGENCY: Federal Aviation Administration, Transportation.

ACTION: Solicitation of applications.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) and the National
Park Service (NPS) are inviting interested persons to apply to fill
three current openings on the National Parks Overflights Advisory Group
(NPOAG). The openings represent environmental interests. The selected
members will serve 3-year terms.

DATES: Persons interested in applying for the NPOAG openings
representing environmental interests need to apply by August 25, 2017.

ADDRESSES: You may submit your interest in filling one of the NPOAG
openings by either of the following methods:
     Email<EMAIL_ADDRESS>     Mail: Keith Lusk, Federal Aviation Administration,
Western-Pacific Region Headquarters, 15000 Aviation Boulevard,
Lawndale, CA 90261.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Keith Lusk, Special Programs Staff,
Federal Aviation Administration, Western-Pacific Region Headquarters,
15000 Aviation Boulevard, Lawndale, CA 90261, telephone: (310) 725-
3808, email<EMAIL_ADDRESS>
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

Background

    The National Parks Air Tour Management Act of 2000 (the Act) was
enacted on April 5, 2000, as Public Law 106-181. The Act required the
establishment of the advisory group within 1 year after its enactment.
The NPOAG was established in March 2001. The advisory group is
comprised of a balanced group of representatives of general aviation,
commercial air tour operations, environmental concerns, and Native
American tribes. The Administrator of the FAA and the Director of NPS
(or their designees) serve as ex officio members of the group.
Representatives of the Administrator and Director serve alternating 1-
year terms as chairman of the advisory group.
    In accordance with the Act, the advisory group provides ``advice,
information, and recommendations to the Administrator and the
Director--
    (1) On the implementation of this title [the Act] and the
amendments made by this title;

    (2) On commonly accepted quiet aircraft technology for use in
commercial air tour operations over a national park or tribal lands,
which will receive preferential treatment in a given air tour
management plan;
    (3) On other measures that might be taken to accommodate the
interests of visitors to national parks; and
    (4) At the request of the Administrator and the Director, safety,
environmental, and other issues related to commercial air tour
operations over a national park or tribal lands.''

Membership

    The NPOAG is made up of one member representing general aviation,
three members representing the commercial air tour industry, four
members representing environmental concerns, and two members
representing Native American interests. Current members of the NPOAG
are as follows:
    The current NPOAG consists of Melissa Rudinger representing general
aviation; Alan Stephen, Mark Francis, and Matthew Zuccaro representing
commercial air tour operators; Rob Smith representing environmental
interests with three current openings; and Leigh Kuwanwisiwma and
Martin Begaye representing Native American interests.

Selection

    In order to retain balance within the NPOAG, the FAA and NPS are
seeking candidates interested in filling these three open seats
representing environmental interests. The FAA and NPS invite persons
interested in representing environmental interests on the NPOAG to
contact Mr. Keith Lusk (contact information is written above in FOR
FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT). Requests to serve on the NPOAG must be
made to Mr. Lusk in writing and postmarked or emailed on or before
August 25, 2017. The request should indicate whether or not you are a
member of an environmental association or group. The request should
also state what expertise you would bring to the NPOAG as related to
issues and concerns with aircraft flights over national parks. The term
of service for NPOAG members is 3 years. Current members may re-apply
for another term.
    On June 18, 2010, President Obama signed a Presidential Memorandum
directing agencies in the Executive Branch not to appoint or re-appoint
federally registered lobbyists to advisory committees and other boards
and commissions. Therefore, before appointing an applicant to serve on
the NPOAG, the FAA and NPS will require the prospective candidate to
certify that they are not a federally registered lobbyist.

    Issued in Hawthorne, CA, on July 18, 2017.
Keith Lusk,
Program Manager, Special Programs Staff, Western-Pacific Region.
[FR Doc. 2017-15489 Filed 7-27-17; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910-13-P


[Federal Register Volume 76, Number 64 (Monday, April 4, 2011)]
[Notices]
[Page 18587]
[FR Doc No: 2011-8038]

=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

[File No. 500-1]

In the Matter of Corestream Energy, Inc. (f/k/a Zealous, Inc.);
Order of Suspension of Trading

March 31, 2011.
    It appears to the Securities and Exchange Commission that there is
a lack of current and accurate information concerning the securities of
Corestream Energy, Inc. (``Corestream'') (f/k/a Zealous, Inc.) because
it has failed to file certain periodic reports with the Commission and
because of questions regarding the accuracy and adequacy of statements
made by Corestream in press releases concerning, among other things,
the acquisition of certain oil wells. Corestream is quoted on OTC Link
(previously the Pink Sheets) operated by OTC Markets Group, Inc. under
the ticker symbol ``ZLUS.''
    The Commission is of the opinion that the public interest and the
protection of investors require a suspension of trading in the
securities of the above-listed company.
    Therefore, it is ordered, pursuant to Section 12(k) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934, that trading in the securities of the
above-listed company is suspended for the period from 9:30 a.m. EDT on
March 31, 2011, through 11:59 p.m. EDT on April 13, 2011.

    By the Commission.
Elizabeth M. Murphy,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2011-8038 Filed 3-31-11; 4:15 pm]
BILLING CODE 8011-01-P


UNITED STATES ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY

WASHINGTON, D.C.  20460

OFFICE OF

PREVENTION, PESTICIDES

AND TOXIC SUBSTANCES

MEMORANDUM

Date: 11/2/07

Subject:	 Ethalfluralin:  Recommended Tolerances for Residues in
Rapeseed, Crambe and Mustard Seed.  Petition No. 2E6466.

DP No.: D346279	Submission No.: 617383

PC Code: 113101	MRID Nos.: n/a

40 CFR 180.416

From:		Christina Swartz, Chemist

		Registration Action Branch 2

		Health Effects Division (7509P)

Through:		Douglas Dotson, Chemist

		Registration Action Branch 2

		Health Effects Division (7509P)

To:		Susan Stanton, Risk Manager

		Risk Integration, Minor Use, and Emergency Response Branch

		Registration Division (7505P)

In a review dated 9/4/07, the ARIA team summarized the residue data and
proposed tolerances for residues of ethalfluralin in potato and dill
commodities.  In addition, the status of the residue chemistry database
with respect to the nature of the residue, storage stability data,
analytical methods, etc. was summarized, and concluded to be adequate.
In a related petition, PP#2E6466, the IR-4 has proposed to allow use of
ethalfluralin on rapeseed (including canola), crambe and mustard seed;
concomitant tolerances of 0.05 ppm for the above commodities have been
proposed.  The tolerance petition indicates ethalfluralin will be
applied in the Sonalan® HFP and Sonalan® 10G formulations to rapeseed,
canola, crambe and mustard seed, at a maximum single and seasonal
application rate of 1.15 lb ai/A.  There is an existing use on canola
with a similar application rate, and with an established tolerance of
0.05 ppm supported by adequate residue data.  In conjunction with the
newly proposed tolerances a Notice of Filing was issued [Federal
Register, Notice of Filing dated 8/31/05, (Volume 70, Number 168)].

In the current petition, the IR-4 stated that the existing residue data
for canola are adequate to support the proposed tolerances, and no
additional residue data are needed.  The ARIA team of RD has already
reviewed the proposed tolerances and concluded they are appropriate, and
supported by adequate residue data.  The estimated dietary exposure
associated with the proposed tolerances was summarized in a memorandum
dated 7/29/02 (J. Redden, DP Barcode No. D283742).  However, the
relevant tolerances were not established/revoked because an aggregate
risk assessment conducted in accordance with the FQPA had not been
completed.

The aggregate risk assessment has now been completed, and aggregate
risks are not of concern.  Therefore, HED recommended in favor of the
proposed tolerances in potato and dill commodities [Risk Assessment, C.
Swartz, DP Barcode Nos. D323068 and D323069, 11/2/07; Dietary Exposure
Assessment, C. Swartz, DP Barcode No. D336469, 11/2/07].  Since the
tolerances proposed under PP#2E6466 have already been included in
HED’s risk assessment, and are supported by adequate residue data and
analytical methods, HED therefore recommends the following tolerances be
established:

Tolerance Summary for Ethalfluralin – Petition # 2E6466

Commodity	Proposed Tolerance (ppm)	Recommended Tolerance (ppm)	Commodity
definition

Rapeseed (including canola)	0.05	0.05	Rapeseed, seed

Crambe	0.05	0.05	Crambe

Mustard seed	0.05	0.05	Mustard, seed

The petitioner (IR-4) also proposed that the existing tolerance on
canola, seed be revoked.  HED concurs with the proposed tolerance
revocation.

HED notes that no CODEX, Canadian or Mexican MRLs (maximum residue
limits) have been established for residues of ethalfluralin for the
commodities rapeseed, seed, crambe and mustard, seed.

Ethalfluralin	Summary of Analytical Chemistry and Residue Data	DP Num:
346279

 PAGE

Page   PAGE  2  of   NUMPAGES  2

Page   PAGE  1  of   NUMPAGES  2


[Federal Register: May 30, 2007 (Volume 72, Number 103)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Page 29886-29889]
[DOCID:fr30my07-12]

=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY

40 CFR Part 52

[EPA-R09-OAR-2007-0236; FRL-8315-9]

Revisions to the California State Implementation Plan, San
Joaquin Valley Unified Air Pollution Control District

AGENCY: Environmental Protection Agency (EPA).

ACTION: Direct final rule.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: EPA is taking direct final action to approve revisions to the
San Joaquin Valley Unified Air Pollution Control District (SJVUAPCD)
portion of the California State Implementation Plan (SIP). These
revisions concern Oxides of Nitrogen (NOX) emissions from
Boilers, Steam Generators and Process Heaters (2.0 MMBtu/hr to 5.0
MMBtu/hr, and 0.075 MMBtu/hr to 2.0 MMBtu/hr); Dryers, Dehydrators, and
Ovens; Natural Gas-Fired, Fan-Type

Residential Central Furnaces; and Solid Fuel Fired Boilers, Steam
Generators and Process Heaters. We are approving local rules that
regulate these emission sources under the Clean Air Act as amended in
1990 (CAA or the Act).

DATES: This rule is effective on July 30, 2007 without further notice,
unless EPA receives adverse comments by June 29, 2007. If we receive
such comments, we will publish a timely withdrawal in the Federal
Register to notify the public that this direct final rule will not take
effect.

ADDRESSES: Submit comments, identified by docket number EPA-R09-OAR-
2007-0236, by one of the following methods:
    1. Federal eRulemaking Portal: http://www.regulations.gov. Follow

the on-line instructions.
    2. E-mail<EMAIL_ADDRESS>    3. Mail or deliver: Andrew Steckel (Air-4), U.S. Environmental
Protection Agency Region IX, 75 Hawthorne Street, San Francisco, CA
94105-3901.
    Instructions: All comments will be included in the public docket
without change and may be made available online at http://www.regulations.gov
, including any personal information provided,

unless the comment includes Confidential Business Information (CBI) or
other information whose disclosure is restricted by statute.
Information that you consider CBI or otherwise protected should be
clearly identified as such and should not be submitted through the
http://www.regulations.gov or e-mail http://www.regulations.gov is an
``anonymous access'' system, and EPA will not know your identity or
contact information unless you provide it in the body of your comment.
If you send e-mail directly to EPA, your e-mail address will be
automatically captured and included as part of the public comment. If
EPA cannot read your comment due to technical difficulties and cannot
contact you for clarification, EPA may not be able to consider your
comment.
    Docket: The index to the docket for this action is available
electronically at http://www.regulations.gov and in hard copy at EPA

Region IX, 75 Hawthorne Street, San Francisco, California. While all
documents in the docket are listed in the index, some information may
be publicly available only at the hard copy location (e.g., copyrighted
material), and some may not be publicly available in either location
(e.g., CBI). To inspect the hard copy materials, please schedule an
appointment during normal business hours with the contact listed in the
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT section.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Francisco D[oacute][ntilde]ez, EPA
Region IX,<PHONE_NUMBER><EMAIL_ADDRESS>
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Throughout this document, ``we,'' ``us'' and
``our'' refer to EPA.

Table of Contents

I. The State's Submittal
    A. What rules did the State submit?
    B. Are there other versions of these rules?
    C. What is the purpose of the submitted rules and rule
revisions?
II. EPA's Evaluation and Action
    A. How is EPA evaluating the rules?
    B. Do the rules meet the evaluation criteria?
    C. EPA recommendations to further improve the rules
    D. Public comment and final action
III. Statutory and Executive Order Reviews

I. The State's Submittal

A. What rules did the State submit?

    Table 1 lists the rules we are approving with the dates that they
were adopted by the local air agencies and submitted by the California
Air Resources Board (CARB).

                                            Table 1.--Submitted Rules
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
               Local agency                   Rule No.             Rule title             Adopted     Submitted
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
SJVUAPCD..................................         4307  Boilers, Steam Generators and     04/20/06     10/05/06
                                                          Process Heaters--2.0 MMBtu/
                                                          hr to 5.0 MMBtu/hr.
SJVUAPCD..................................         4308  Boilers, Steam Generators and     10/20/05     03/10/06
                                                          Process Heaters--0.075 MMBtu/
                                                          hr to 2.0 MMBtu/hr.
SJVUAPCD..................................         4309  Dryers, Dehydrators, and          12/15/05     03/10/06
                                                          Ovens.
SJVUAPCD..................................         4352  Solid Fuel Fired Boilers,         05/18/06     10/05/06
                                                          Steam Generators and Process
                                                          Heaters.
SJVUAPCD..................................         4905  Natural Gas-Fired, Fan-Type       10/20/05     03/10/06
                                                          Residential Central Furnaces.
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

    On March 30, 2006, the submittals of Rules 4308, 4309, and 4905
were found to meet the completeness criteria in 40 CFR Part 51 Appendix
V, which must be met before formal EPA review. On October 24, 2006, the
submittals of Rules 4307 and 4352 were found to meet these completeness
criteria.

B. Are there other versions of these rules?

    Rules 4308, 4309, and 4905 are new rules submitted to us for the
first time. There are no previous versions of Rule 4307 in the SIP,
although the SJVUAPCD adopted an earlier version of this rule on
December 15, 2005, and CARB submitted it to us on March 10, 2006. We
approved a version of Rule 4352 into the SIP on February 11, 1999 (64
FR 6803). The SJVUAPCD adopted revisions to the SIP-approved version on
May 18, 2006 and CARB submitted them to us on October 5, 2006. While we
can act on only the most recently submitted version, we have reviewed
materials provided with previous submittals.

C. What is the purpose of the submitted rules and rule revisions?

    NOX helps produce ground-level ozone, smog and
particulate matter, which harm human health and the environment.
Section 110(a) of the CAA requires states to submit regulations that
control NOX emissions. The amendments to Rule 4307 are
purely administrative, and do no change any emissions reduction
requirements. New Rule 4308 requires that small boilers, steam
generators and process heaters (0.075 to 2.0 million British thermal
units per hour, MMBtu/hr) be certified to meet NOX emission
limits. New Rule 4309 limits NOX and carbon monoxide (CO)
emissions from dryers, dehydrators and ovens with total rated heat
input of 5.0 MMBtu/hr or greater. The amendments to Rule 4352 expand
the rule's scope to apply to units with potential NOX
emissions of 10 tons per year; the emissions limits have also been
strengthened. New Rule 4905 limits NOX emissions from
natural gas-fired, fan-type residential central furnaces with a rated
heat input capacity of less than 175,000 Btu/hr, or a rated cooling
capacity of less than 65,000 Btu/hr for combination heating and cooling
units. EPA's technical support documents (TSD) have more information
about these rules.

II. EPA's Evaluation and Action

A. How is EPA evaluating the rules?

    Generally, SIP rules must be enforceable (see section 110(a) of the
Act), must require Reasonably Available

Control Technology (RACT) for each category of sources covered by a
Control Technique Guideline (CTG) document as well as each major source
in nonattainment areas (see sections 182(a)(2) and 182(f)), and must
not relax existing requirements (see sections 110(l) and 193). The
SJVUAPCD regulates a ``serious'' ozone nonattainment area (see 40 CFR
part 81), so Rules 4307, 4308, 4309, 4352, and 4905 must fulfill RACT.
In addition, the San Joaquin Valley is a ``serious'' particulate matter
(PM-10) nonattainment area, and is therefore required under section
189(b)(1)(B) and (e) of the Act to implement Best Available Control
Measures (BACM) (which includes Best Available Control Technology or
BACT) for control of PM-10 precursor emissions, including
NOX.
    Guidance and policy documents that we use to help evaluate
enforceability and RACT requirements consistently include the
following:
    1. ``State Implementation Plans; Nitrogen Oxides Supplement to the
General Preamble; Clean Air Act Amendments of 1990 Implementation of
Title I; Proposed Rule,'' (the NOX Supplement), 57 FR 55620,
November 25, 1992.
    2. ``Issues Relating to VOC Regulation Cutpoints, Deficiencies, and
Deviations,'' U.S. EPA, May 25, 1988 (the Bluebook).
    3. ``Guidance Document for Correcting Common VOC & Other Rule
Deficiencies,'' U.S. EPA Region 9, August 21, 2001 (the Little
Bluebook).
    4. ``Determination of Reasonably Available Control Technology and
Best Available Retrofit Control Technology for Industrial,
Institutional, and Commercial Boilers, Steam Generators, and Process
Heaters,'' California Air Resources Board, July 18, 1991.
    5. ``Alternative Control Techniques Document--NOX
Emissions from Industrial/Commercial/Institutional (ICI) Boilers,''
U.S. EPA, EPA-453/R-94-022, March 1994.
    6. ``State Implementation Plans: Policy Regarding Excess Emissions
during Malfunctions, Startup, and Shutdown,'' U.S. EPA Memorandum to
Regional Administrators, September 20, 1999.

B. Do the rules meet the evaluation criteria?

    We believe these rules are consistent with the relevant policy and
guidance regarding enforceability, RACT, BACM, and SIP relaxations. The
TSDs have more information on our evaluation.

C. EPA Recommendations to Further Improve the Rules

    The TSDs describe additional rule revisions that do not affect
EPA(s current action but are recommended for the next time the local
agency modifies the rules.

D. Public Comment and Final Action

    As authorized in section 110(k)(3) of the Act, EPA is fully
approving the submitted rules because we believe they fulfill all
relevant requirements. We do not think anyone will object to this
approval, so we are finalizing it without proposing it in advance.
However, in the Proposed Rules section of this Federal Register, we are
simultaneously proposing approval of the same submitted rules. If we
receive adverse comments by June 29, 2007, we will publish a timely
withdrawal in the Federal Register to notify the public that the direct
final approval will not take effect and we will address the comments in
a subsequent final action based on the proposal. If we do not receive
timely adverse comments, the direct final approval will be effective
without further notice on July 30, 2007. This will incorporate these
rules into the federally enforceable SIP.
    Please note that if EPA receives adverse comment on an amendment,
paragraph, or section of this rule and if that provision may be severed
from the remainder of the rule, EPA may adopt as final those provisions
of the rule that are not the subject of an adverse comment.

III. Statutory and Executive Order Reviews

    Under Executive Order 12866 (58 FR 51735, October 4, 1993), this
action is not a ``significant regulatory action'' and therefore is not
subject to review by the Office of Management and Budget. For this
reason, this action is also not subject to Executive Order 13211,
``Actions Concerning Regulations That Significantly Affect Energy
Supply, Distribution, or Use'' (66 FR 28355, May 22, 2001). This action
merely approves state law as meeting Federal requirements and imposes
no additional requirements beyond those imposed by state law.
Accordingly, the Administrator certifies that this rule will not have a
significant economic impact on a substantial number of small entities
under the Regulatory Flexibility Act (5 U.S.C. 601 et seq.). Because
this rule approves pre-existing requirements under state law and does
not impose any additional enforceable duty beyond that required by
state law, it does not contain any unfunded mandate or significantly or
uniquely affect small governments, as described in the Unfunded
Mandates Reform Act of 1995 (Pub. L. 104-4).
    This rule also does not have tribal implications because it will
not have a substantial direct effect on one or more Indian tribes, on
the relationship between the Federal Government and Indian tribes, or
on the distribution of power and responsibilities between the Federal
Government and Indian tribes, as specified by Executive Order 13175 (65
FR 67249, November 9, 2000). This action also does not have Federalism
implications because it does not have substantial direct effects on the
States, on the relationship between the national government and the
States, or on the distribution of power and responsibilities among the
various levels of government, as specified in Executive Order 13132 (64
FR 43255, August 10, 1999). This action merely approves a state rule
implementing a Federal standard, and does not alter the relationship or
the distribution of power and responsibilities established in the Clean
Air Act. This rule also is not subject to Executive Order 13045
``Protection of Children from Environmental Health Risks and Safety
Risks'' (62 FR 19885, April 23, 1997), because it approves a state rule
implementing a Federal standard.
    In reviewing SIP submissions, EPA's role is to approve state
choices, provided that they meet the criteria of the Clean Air Act. In
this context, in the absence of a prior existing requirement for the
State to use voluntary consensus standards (VCS), EPA has no authority
to disapprove a SIP submission for failure to use VCS. It would thus be
inconsistent with applicable law for EPA, when it reviews a SIP
submission; to use VCS in place of a SIP submission that otherwise
satisfies the provisions of the Clean Air Act. Thus, the requirements
of section 12(d) of the National Technology Transfer and Advancement
Act of 1995 (15 U.S.C. 272 note) do not apply. This rule does not
impose an information collection burden under the provisions of the
Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 (44 U.S.C. 3501 et seq.).
    The Congressional Review Act, 5 U.S.C. 801 et seq., as added by the
Small Business Regulatory Enforcement Fairness Act of 1996, generally
provides that before a rule may take effect, the agency promulgating
the rule must submit a rule report, which includes a copy of the rule,
to each House of the Congress and to the Comptroller General of the
United States. EPA will submit a report containing this rule and other
required information to the U.S. Senate,

the U.S. House of Representatives, and the Comptroller General of the
United States prior to publication of the rule in the Federal Register.
A major rule cannot take effect until 60 days after it is published in
the Federal Register. This action is not a ``major rule'' as defined by
5 U.S.C. 804(2).
    Under section 307(b)(1) of the Clean Air Act, petitions for
judicial review of this action must be filed in the United States Court
of Appeals for the appropriate circuit by July 30, 2007. Filing a
petition for reconsideration by the Administrator of this final rule
does not affect the finality of this rule for the purposes of judicial
review nor does it extend the time within which a petition for judicial
review may be filed, and shall not postpone the effectiveness of such
rule or action. This action may not be challenged later in proceedings
to enforce its requirements. (See section 307(b)(2).)

List of Subjects in 40 CFR Part 52

    Environmental protection, Air pollution control, Incorporation by
reference, Intergovernmental relations, Nitrogen dioxide, Ozone,
Particulate matter, Reporting and recordkeeping requirements.

    Dated: April 30, 2007.
Laura Yoshii,
Acting Regional Administrator, Region IX.

0
Part 52, Chapter I, Title 40 of the Code of Federal Regulations is
amended as follows:

PART 52--[AMENDED]

0
1. The authority citation for part 52 continues to read as follows:

    Authority: 42 U.S.C. 7401 et seq.

Subpart F--California

0
2. Section 52.220 is amended by adding paragraphs (c)(344)(i)(C) and
(347) to read as follows:

Sec.  52.220  Identification of plan.

* * * * *
    (c) * * *
    (344) * * *
    (i) * * *
    (C) San Joaquin Valley Unified Air Quality Management District.
    (1) Rule 4308, adopted on October 20, 2005; Rule 4309, adopted on
December 15, 2005; and Rule 4905, adopted on October 20, 2005.
* * * * *
    (347) New and amended regulations for the following APCDs were
submitted on October 5, 2006, by the Governor's designee.
    (i) Incorporation by reference.
    (A) San Joaquin Valley Unified Air Pollution Control District.
    (1) Rule 4307, adopted on April 20, 2006; and Rule 4352, adopted on
May 18, 2006.
* * * * *
 [FR Doc. E7-10236 Filed 5-29-07; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 6560-50-P