[Federal Register Volume 79, Number 31 (Friday, February 14, 2014)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Pages 8855-8857]
[FR Doc No: 2014-03286]

=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF LABOR

Occupational Safety and Health Administration

29 CFR Part 1952

[Docket No. OSHA 2012-0029]
RIN 1218-AC89

Hawaii State Plan for Occupational Safety and Health; Operational
Status Agreement Revisions

AGENCY: Occupational Safety and Health Administration, Department of
Labor.

ACTION: Final rule.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: This document announces revisions to the Operational Status
Agreement between the Occupational Safety and Health Administration
(OSHA) and the Hawaii State Plan, which specifies the respective areas
of federal and state authority, and under which Hawaii will reassume
additional coverage.

DATES: Effective February 14, 2014.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
    For press inquiries: Francis Meilinger, OSHA Office of
Communications, Room N-3647, U.S. Department of Labor, 200 Constitution
Avenue NW., Washington, DC 20210; telephone<PHONE_NUMBER>; email:
<EMAIL_ADDRESS>    For general and technical information: Douglas J. Kalinowski,
Director, OSHA Directorate of Cooperative and State Programs, Room N-
3700, U.S. Department of Labor, 200 Constitution Avenue NW., Washington
DC 20210; telephone:<PHONE_NUMBER>; email<EMAIL_ADDRESS>
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

Background

    Hawaii administers an OSHA-approved state plan to develop and
enforce occupational safety and health standards for public and private
sector employers, pursuant to the provisions of Section 18 of the
Occupational Safety and Health Act (the Act). Pursuant to Section 18(e)
of the Act, OSHA granted Hawaii ``final approval'' effective April 30,
1984 (49 FR 19182). A final approval determination results in the
relinquishment of federal concurrent enforcement authority in the state
with respect to occupational safety and health issues covered by the
plan. 29 U.S.C. 667(e).
    From 2009-2012, the Hawaii State Plan faced major budgetary and
staffing restraints that significantly affected its program. Therefore,
the Hawaii Director of Labor and Industrial Relations requested a
temporary modification of the state plan's approval status from final
approval to initial approval, to permit exercise of supplemental
federal enforcement activity and to allow Hawaii sufficient time and
assistance to strengthen its state plan. On June 22, 2012, a Notice of
Proposed Rulemaking was published and on September 21, 2012, OSHA
published a Final Rule in the Federal Register (77 FR 58488) that
modified the Hawaii State Plan's ``final approval'' determination under
Section 18(e) of the Act, transitioned the Plan to ``initial approval''
status under Section 18(b) of the Act, and reinstated concurrent
federal enforcement authority over occupational safety and health
issues in the private sector. That

Federal Register notice also provided notice of the Operational Status
Agreement (OSA) between OSHA and the Hawaii Occupational Safety and
Health Division (HIOSH), which specified the respective areas of
federal and state authority.
    After the first year of the planned three-year developmental
period, Hawaii's Department of Labor and Industrial Relations has taken
the initial steps in rebuilding the capacity of HIOSH. Hawaii is
committed to redeveloping its State Plan, and has increased its staff
recruitment to reach its staffing benchmark, and has increased its
inspection activity by 148% over the prior fiscal year. HIOSH and OSHA
have worked together to strengthen the State Plan. A meeting between
federal and state representatives on September 11-13, 2013 discussed
the successes and challenges of the first year under the OSA and worked
to clarify the next steps needed to be taken as the state agency
further develops. OSHA and HIOSH agreed to amend the OSA to return
greater responsibility to HIOSH for Fiscal Year 2014. Accordingly, this
final rule amends OSHA regulations to reflect this change in the OSA
between the parties by removing the reference to the specific 2012 OSA.

Notice of Revisions to the Operational Status Agreement

    Federal OSHA and HIOSH will exercise their respective enforcement
authority according to the terms of the 2012 OSA between OSHA and
HIOSH, which specifies the respective areas of federal and state
authority, with revisions agreed to in September 2013. Under the 2012
OSA, Federal OSHA retained coverage over all Federal employees and
sites, private sector maritime activities, private sector employees
within the secured borders of all military installations where access
is controlled, and United States Postal Service including contract
workers and contractor operated facilities, and assumed coverage over
agriculture and most of general industry including facilities that
include processes covered by the Process Safety Management standard (29
CFR 1910.119) as well as provisions of general industry and
construction standards (29 CFR 1910 and 1926) appropriate to hazards
found in that employment. Hawaii retained coverage over the
construction industry, transportation and warehousing, and state and
local government as an employer. All terms of the 2012 OSA remain in
effect, except that Hawaii will resume responsibility over
Manufacturing (NAICS 31 through 33) except Refineries (NAICS 324) and
any other private sector facilities that include processes covered by
the Process Safety Management standard (29 CFR 1910.119). Federal OSHA
will also enforce provisions of the Act and of the general industry and
construction standards appropriate to hazards found in facilities with
processes that are covered by the Process Safety Management standard.
Further, the revised OSA provides a mechanism for the most-available
agency to respond to life-threatening situations on neighbor islands.

Regulatory Flexibility Analysis and Unfunded Mandates

    In accordance with the Regulatory Flexibility Act, 5 U.S.C. 601 et
seq. (as amended), OSHA examined the regulatory requirements of the
final rule to determine whether it would have a significant economic
impact on a substantial number of small entities. Since no employer of
any size will have any new compliance obligations, the Agency certifies
that the final rule will not have a significant economic impact on a
substantial number of small entities. OSHA also reviewed this final
rule in accordance with the Unfunded Mandates Reform Act of 1995 (UMRA;
2 U.S.C. 1501 et seq.) and Executive Order 12875 (56 FR 58093). Because
this rule imposes no new compliance obligations, it requires no
additional expenditures by either private employers or State, local,
and tribal governments.

Federalism

    Executive Order 13132, ``Federalism,'' (64 FR 43255, August 10,
1999) emphasizes consultation between Federal agencies and the States
and establishes specific review procedures the Federal government must
follow as it carries out policies which affect State or local
governments. OSHA has consulted extensively with Hawaii about this
modification of the Operational Status Agreement. Although OSHA has
determined that the requirements and consultation procedures provided
in Executive Order 13132 are not applicable to approval decisions under
the Act, which have no effect outside the particular State, OSHA has
reviewed this final rule, and believes it is consistent with the
principles and criteria set forth in the Executive Order.

Administrative Procedures

    This Federal Register document is designated a ``final rule.'' That
designation is necessary because OSHA publishes a general description
of every state plan in 29 CFR part 1952. Because they are set forth in
the Code of Federal Regulation, these descriptions can be updated only
by publishing a ``final rule'' document in the final rules section of
the Federal Register. Such rules do not contain any new federal
regulatory requirements, but merely provide public information about
the state plan.
    OSHA finds that good cause exists for making this rule effective
immediately upon publication in the Federal Register. Today's action is
solely a change in Federal OSHA's procedures. It does not impose any
new compliance obligations on affected employers, since Hawaii's safety
and health standards and regulations are virtually all identical to
OSHA's regulations. There are a very few instances in which Hawaii has
more stringent requirements; however these state standards remain in
effect and OSHA will make referrals to the state when needed.
Therefore, employers' compliance obligations are not legally affected
by the amendment to the OSA announced in this notice. For these
reasons, public notice and comment are unnecessary, and good cause
exists for making this final rule effective upon publication in the
Federal Register. Accordingly, OSHA finds that public participation is
unnecessary, and this rule is effective upon publication in the Federal
Register.

List of Subjects in 29 CFR Part 1952

    Intergovernmental relations, Law enforcement, Occupational safety
and health.

Authority and Signature

    David Michaels, Ph.D., MPH, Assistant Secretary of Labor for
Occupational Safety and Health, U.S. Department of Labor, 200
Constitution Ave. NW., Washington, DC, authorized the preparation of
this notice. OSHA is issuing this notice under the authority specified
by Section 18 of the Occupational Safety and Health Act of 1970 (29
U.S.C. 667), Secretary of Labor's Order No. 1-2012 (77 FR 3912), and 29
CFR part 1902.

    Signed in Washington, DC, on February 10, 2014.
David Michaels,
Assistant Secretary of Labor for Occupational Safety and Health.

    Accordingly, for the reasons set forth in the Preamble, 29 CFR Part
1952 is amended as set forth below.

PART 1952--[AMENDED]

0
1. The authority citation for part 1952 continues to read as follows:

    Authority: Sec. 18, 84 Stat. 1608 (29 U.S.C. 667); 29 CFR part
1902; Secretary of Labor's Order No. 1-2012 (77 FR 3912).

Subpart Y--Hawaii

0
2. Amend Sec.  1952.314 by revising paragraph (b) to read as follows:

Sec.  1952.314  Level of Federal enforcement.

* * * * *
    (b) To provide a workable division of enforcement responsibilities,
Hawaii and Federal OSHA have entered into an operational status
agreement. Electronic copies of the agreement are available at: http://www.osha.gov/dcsp/osp/stateprogs/hawaii.html.

[FR Doc. 2014-03286 Filed 2-13-14; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4510-26-P


[Federal Register Volume 84, Number 31 (Thursday, February 14, 2019)]
[Notices]
[Page 4128]
[FR Doc No: 2019-02306]

=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION

Federal Aviation Administration

Agency Information Collection Activities: Requests for Comments;
Clearance of Renewed Approval of Information Collection: Hazardous
Materials Training Requirements

AGENCY: Federal Aviation Administration (FAA), DOT.

ACTION: Notice and request for comments.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: In accordance with the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995, FAA
invites public comments about our intention to request the Office of
Management and Budget (OMB) approval for to renew an information
collection. The Federal Register Notice with a 60-day comment period
soliciting comments on the following collection of information was
published on November 02, 2018. This collection involves FAA
certification process requirements for operators and repair stations
who are required to submit documentation related to hazardous materials
training programs.

DATES: Written comments should be submitted by March 18, 2019.

ADDRESSES: Interested persons are invited to submit written comments on
the proposed information collection to the Office of Information and
Regulatory Affairs, Office of Management and Budget. Comments should be
addressed to the attention of the Desk Officer, Department of
Transportation/FAA, and sent via electronic mail to
<EMAIL_ADDRESS>or faxed to<PHONE_NUMBER>, or mailed to
the Office of Information and Regulatory Affairs, Office of Management
and Budget, Docket Library, Room 10102, 725 17th Street NW, Washington,
DC 20503.
    Public Comments Invited: You are asked to comment on any aspect of
this information collection, including (a) Whether the proposed
collection of information is necessary for FAA's performance; (b) the
accuracy of the estimated burden; (c) ways for FAA to enhance the
quality, utility and clarity of the information collection; and (d)
ways that the burden could be minimized without reducing the quality of
the collected information. The agency will summarize and/or include
your comments in the request for OMB's clearance of this information
collection.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Barbara Hall at<PHONE_NUMBER>, or by
email at<EMAIL_ADDRESS>
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
    OMB Control Number: 2120-0705.
    Title: Hazardous Materials Training Requirements.
    Form Numbers: There are no FAA forms associated with this
collection of information.
    Type of Review: Renewal of an information collection.
    Background: The FAA, as prescribed in 14 CFR parts 121 and 135,
requires certificate holders to submit manuals and hazardous materials
(hazmat) training programs, or revisions to an approved hazmat training
program to obtain initial and final approval as part of the FAA
certification process. Original certification is completed in
accordance with 14 CFR part 119. Continuing certification is completed
in accordance with 14 CFR parts 121 and 135. The FAA uses the approval
process to determine compliance of the hazmat training programs with
the applicable regulations, national policies and safe operating
practices. The FAA must ensure that the documents adequately establish
safe operating procedures. Additionally, 14 CFR part 145 requires
certain repair stations to provide documentation showing that persons
handling hazmat for transportation have been trained following DOT
guidelines.
    Respondents: Part 121, 135, and 145 certificate holders.
Approximately 2,800.
    Information is collected on occasion. Part 121 and part 135
operators are required to submit documentation of their hazardous
materials training to receive original certification. If the operator
decides to make a change to their training program, they must provide
the updated manual. Part 145 repair station is required to submit a
statement to the FAA certifying that all of their hazmat employees are
trained under the Hazardous Materials Regulations prior to receiving
their initial part 145 certificate.
    Estimated Average Burden per Response: The amount of time per
response is expected to vary. For example, new responses take
significantly longer than revisions. Furthermore, operators with will-
carry hazardous materials operations are anticipated to have longer
responses than will-not carry hazardous materials operations. Part 145
repair stations will require less time to develop a certification
statements than operators require to develop a manual. Additionally
certificate holders vary in the type and size of the operations.
Certificate holders are not anticipated to spend the same amount of
time each year. Therefore, based on FAA's subject matter expertise we
continue to expect reporting to take an average .6 hours, and
recordkeeping to take .7 hours for a total of 1.3 hours per response.
These are an annualized average which account for the wide variability
in the type, complexity and size of operation. Additionally, the type
of update can vary. Operators may make minor revisions to the manual,
or they may choose to make more significant changes reflecting a larger
change in their operations.
    Estimated Total Annual Burden: 7,300 hours.

    Issued in Washington, DC, on December 10, 2018.
Barbara Hall,
FAA Information Collection Clearance Officer, IT Enterprises Business
Services Division, ASP-110.
[FR Doc. 2019-02306 Filed 2-13-19; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910-13-P


[Federal Register Volume 79, Number 90 (Friday, May 9, 2014)]
[Proposed Rules]
[Pages 26661-26664]
[FR Doc No: 2014-10625]

=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY

Coast Guard

33 CFR Part 100

[Docket No. USCG-2012-0714]
RIN 1625-AA08

Special Local Regulation; Annual Events on the Maumee River

AGENCY: Coast Guard, DHS.

ACTION: Supplemental notice of proposed rulemaking.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Coast Guard proposes to amend its regulations by adding
two Special Local Regulations within the Captain of the Port Detroit
Zone on the Maumee River, Toledo, Ohio. These special local regulated
areas are necessary to protect spectators, participants, and vessels
from the hazards associated with these races. These regulations are
intended to regulate vessel movement in portions of the Maumee River
during the annual Dragon Boat Races and Frogtown Races.

DATES: Comments and related material must be received by the Coast
Guard on or before June 9, 2014.

ADDRESSES: You may submit comments identified by docket number USCG-
2012-0714 using any one of the following methods:
    (1) Federal eRulemaking Portal: http://www.regulations.gov.
    (2) Fax:<PHONE_NUMBER>.
    (3) Mail: Docket Management Facility (M-30), U.S. Department of
Transportation, West Building Ground Floor, Room W12-140, 1200 New
Jersey Avenue SE., Washington, DC 20590-0001.
    (4) Hand delivery: Same as mail address above; deliveries are
accepted between 9 a.m. and 5 p.m., Monday through Friday, except
Federal holidays. The telephone number is<PHONE_NUMBER>.
    To avoid duplication, please use only one of these four methods.
See the ``Public Participation and Request for Comments'' portion of
the SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION section below for instructions on
submitting comments.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: If you have questions on this proposed
rule, call or email LT Jennifer M. Disco, Response Department, Marine
Safety Unit Toledo, Coast Guard; telephone<PHONE_NUMBER>, email
<EMAIL_ADDRESS>If you have questions on viewing or
submitting material to the docket, call Ms. Cheryl Collins, Program
Manager, Docket Operations, telephone<PHONE_NUMBER> or 1-800-647-5527.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

Table of Acronyms

DHS Department of Homeland Security
FR Federal Register
NAD 83 North American Datum of 1983
NPRM Notice of Proposed Rulemaking
Sec.  Section

A. Public Participation and Request for Comments

    We encourage you to participate in this rulemaking by submitting
comments and related materials. All comments received will be posted
without change to http://www.regulations.gov and will include any
personal information you have provided.

1. Submitting Comments

    If you submit a comment, please include the docket number for this
rulemaking (USCG-2012-0714), indicate the specific section of this
document to which each comment applies, and provide a reason for each
suggestion or recommendation. You may submit your comments and material
online at http://www.regulations.gov, or by fax, mail or hand delivery,
but please use only one of these means. If you submit a comment online,
it will be considered received by the Coast Guard when the comment is
successfully transmitted. If you fax, hand deliver, or mail your
comment, it will be considered as having been received by the Coast
Guard when the comment is received at the Docket Management Facility.
We recommend that you include your name and a mailing address, an email
address, or a telephone number in the body of your document so that we
can contact you if we have questions regarding your submission.
    To submit your comment online, go to http://www.regulations.gov,
type the docket number (USCG-2012-0714) in the ``SEARCH'' box and click
``SEARCH.'' Click on ``Submit a Comment'' on the line associated with
this rulemaking.
    If you submit your comments by mail or hand delivery, submit them
in an unbound format, no larger than 8\1/2\ by 11 inches, suitable for
copying and electronic filing. If you submit comments by mail and would
like to know that they reached the Facility, please enclose a stamped,
self-addressed postcard or envelope. We will consider all comments and
material received during the comment period and may change the proposed
rule based on your comments.

2. Viewing Comments and Documents

    To view comments, as well as documents mentioned in this preamble
as being available in the docket, go to http://www.regulations.gov,
type the docket number (USCG-2012-0714) in the ``SEARCH'' box and click
``SEARCH.'' Click on Open Docket Folder on the line associated with
this rulemaking. You may also visit the Docket Management Facility in
Room W12-140 on the ground floor of the Department of Transportation
West Building, 1200 New Jersey Avenue SE., Washington, DC 20590,
between 9 a.m. and 5 p.m., Monday through Friday, except Federal
holidays.

3. Privacy Act

    Anyone can search the electronic form of comments received into any
of

our dockets by the name of the individual submitting the comment (or
signing the comment, if submitted on behalf of an association,
business, labor union, etc.). You may review a Privacy Act notice
regarding our public dockets in the January 17, 2008 issue of the
Federal Register (73 FR 3316).

4. Public Meeting

    We do not now plan to hold a public meeting, but you may submit a
request for one using one of the four methods specified under
ADDRESSES. Please explain why you believe a public meeting would be
beneficial. If we determine that one would aid this rulemaking, we will
hold one at a time and place announced by a later notice in the Federal
Register.

B. Regulatory History and Information

    On September 10, 2012, the Coast Guard published a notice of
proposed rulemaking (NPRM) entitled Special Local Regulation;
Partnership in Education Dragon Boat Race, Maumee River Toledo, OH in
the Federal Register (77 FR 55436; USCG-2012-0714). One public comment
was received in response to the September 10, 2012 NPRM publication in
the Federal Register, which will be addressed in the Discussion of
Proposed Rule section; a public meeting was not requested, and no
public meetings were held.
    In this supplemental notice of proposed rulemaking, in addition to
amending 33 CFR part 100 for the Dragon Boat Race, we are proposing a
special local regulation for the Frogtown Races which is also conducted
on the Maumee River.

C. Basis and Purpose

    Each year, two organized racing events take place on the Maumee
River. The Dragon Boat Races, in which participants paddle Hong Kong-
style Dragon Boats from International Park at approximate River Mile
4.45 to just south of the mouth of Swan Creek at approximate River Mile
4.77 on the Maumee River, Toledo, OH; and the Frogtown Races, in which
participants row shell boats from the Norfolk and Southern Bridge at
River Mile 1.80 to the Anthony Wayne Bridge at River Mile 5.16 on the
Maumee River, Toledo, OH. The Captain of the Port Detroit has
determined that these boat races, which are in close proximity to
watercraft and in the shipping channel pose extra and unusual hazards
to public safety and property, including potential collisions,
allisions, and individuals falling in the water. Thus, the Captain of
the Port Detroit has determined it necessary to establish a permanent
Special Local Regulation around each location of these two races to
ensure the safety of persons and property at these annual events and to
help minimize the associated risks.

D. Discussion of Proposed Rule

    The Captain of the Port Detroit proposes to establish the following
special local regulations:
    Dragon Boat Races, Maumee River, Toledo, OH: In response to the
Dragon Boat Race 2012 NPRM, a commenter noted that a clause in the
preamble of the NPRM stated that ``the races will stop for oncoming
freighter or commercial traffic'' did not appear in the regulatory
text, but that it should. The Coast Guard concurs with this
recommendation, and has inserted this clause in the Dragon Boat
Festival SLR proposed regulatory text. See paragraph (c)(1) of proposed
Sec.  100.927.
    The Dragon Boat Festival special local regulation would encompass
all navigable waters of the United States on the Maumee River, Toledo,
OH, bound by a line extending from a point on land just north of the
Cherry Street Bridge at position 41[deg]39'5.27'' N; 083[deg]31'34.01''
W straight across the river along the Cherry Street bridge to position
41[deg] 39'12.83'' N; 083[deg] 31'42.58'' W and a line extending from a
point of land just south of International Park at position
41[deg]38'46.62'' N; 083[deg]31'50.54'' W straight across the river to
the shore adjacent to position 41[deg]38'47.37'' N; 083[deg]32'2.05'' W
(NAD 83). It would be enforced annually on the third or fourth Saturday
in July. The exact dates and times would be issued annually via a
Notice of Enforcement.
    Frogtown Races, Maumee River, Toledo, OH: This Special Local
Regulation would encompass all U.S. waters on the Maumee River, Toledo,
OH from the Norfolk and Southern Railway Bridge at River Mile 1.80 to
the Anthony Wayne Bridge at River Mile 5.16. It would be enforced
annually on the third or fourth Saturday in September. The exact dates
and times would be issued annually via a Notice of Enforcement.

E. Regulatory Analyses

    We developed these proposed rules after considering numerous
statutes and executive orders related to rulemaking. Below we summarize
our analyses based on these statutes and executive orders.

1. Regulatory Planning and Review

    These proposed rules are not significant regulatory actions under
section 3(f) of Executive Order 12866, Regulatory Planning and Review,
and do not require assessments of potential costs and benefits under
section 6(a)(3) of that Order. The Office of Management and Budget has
not reviewed it under that Order. They are not ``significant'' under
the regulatory policies and procedures of the Department of Homeland
Security (DHS). We conclude that these proposed rules are not
significant regulatory actions because we anticipate that they will
have minimal impact on the economy, will not interfere with other
agencies, will not adversely alter the budget of any grant or loan
recipients, and will not raise any novel legal or policy issues.
    The Special Local Regulations will be relatively small and be
enforced for a relatively short time. Thus, restrictions on vessel
movement within that particular area are expected to be minimal. Under
certain conditions, moreover, vessels may still transit through the
area when permitted by the Captain of the Port.

2. Impact on Small Entities

    Under the Regulatory Flexibility Act (5 U.S.C. 601-612), we have
considered the impact of this proposed rule on small entities. The
Coast Guard certifies under 5 U.S.C. 605(b) that this proposed rule
will not have a significant economic impact on a substantial number of
small entities.
    These proposed rules would affect the following entities, some of
which may be small entities: the owners and operators of vessels
intending to transit or anchor in the areas designated as special local
regulations during the dates and times the special local regulations
are being enforced.
    These proposed Special Local Regulations will not have a
significant economic impact on a substantial number of small entities
for the following reasons: These rules will be enforced for
approximately 12 hours the 1 day each is enforced annually. In
addition, on-scene representatives will allow vessels to transit along
the Western side of the river at a slow no wake speed. The race
committees will stop the races for any oncoming commercial traffic.
    If you think that your business, organization, or governmental
jurisdiction qualifies as a small entity and that this proposed rule
would have a significant economic impact on it, please submit a comment
(see ADDRESSES) explaining why you think it qualifies and how and to
what degree this rule would economically affect it.

3. Assistance for Small Entities

    Under section 213(a) of the Small Business Regulatory Enforcement
Fairness Act of 1996 (Pub. L. 104-121), we want to assist small
entities in understanding this proposed rule. If the proposed rule
would affect your small business, organization, or governmental
jurisdiction and you have questions concerning its provisions or
options for compliance, please contact the person listed in the FOR
FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT, above. The Coast Guard will not retaliate
against small entities that question or complain about this proposed
rule or any policy or action of the Coast Guard.

4. Collection of Information

    This proposed rule would call for no new collection of information
under the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 (44 U.S.C. 3501-3520).

5. Federalism

    A rule has implications for federalism under Executive Order 13132,
Federalism, if it has a substantial direct effect on State or local
governments and would either preempt State law or impose a substantial
direct cost of compliance on them. We have analyzed this proposed rule
under that Order and have determined that it does not have implications
for federalism.

6. Protest Activities

    The Coast Guard respects the First Amendment rights of protesters.
Protesters are asked to contact the person listed in the FOR FURTHER
INFORMATION CONTACT section to coordinate protest activities so that
your message can be received without jeopardizing the safety or
security of people, places or vessels.

7. Unfunded Mandates Reform Act

    The Unfunded Mandates Reform Act of 1995 (2 U.S.C. 1531-1538)
requires Federal agencies to assess the effects of their discretionary
regulatory actions. In particular, the Act addresses actions that may
result in the expenditure by a State, local, or tribal government, in
the aggregate, or by the private sector of $100,000,000 (adjusted for
inflation) or more in any one year. Though this proposed rule would not
result in such an expenditure, we do discuss the effects of this
proposed rule elsewhere in this preamble.

8. Taking of Private Property

    This proposed rule would not affect a taking of private property or
otherwise have taking implications under Executive Order 12630,
Governmental Actions and Interference with Constitutionally Protected
Property Rights.

9. Civil Justice Reform

    This proposed rule meets applicable standards in sections 3(a) and
3(b)(2) of Executive Order 12988, Civil Justice Reform, to minimize
litigation, eliminate ambiguity, and reduce burden.

10. Protection of Children

    We have analyzed this proposed rule under Executive Order 13045,
Protection of Children from Environmental Health Risks and Safety
Risks. This proposed rule is not an economically significant rule and
would not create an environmental risk to health or risk to safety that
might disproportionately affect children.

11. Indian Tribal Governments

    This proposed rule does not have tribal implications under
Executive Order 13175, Consultation and Coordination with Indian Tribal
Governments, because it does not have a substantial direct effect on
one or more Indian tribes, on the relationship between the Federal
Government and Indian tribes, or on the distribution of power and
responsibilities between the Federal Government and Indian tribes.

12. Energy Effects

    This proposed rule is not a ``significant energy action'' under
Executive Order 13211, Actions Concerning Regulations That
Significantly Affect Energy Supply, Distribution, or Use.

13. Technical Standards

    This proposed rule does not use technical standards. Therefore, we
did not consider the use of voluntary consensus standards.

14. Environment

    We have analyzed this proposed rule under Department of Homeland
Security Management Directive 023-01 and Commandant Instruction
M16475.lD, which guide the Coast Guard in complying with the National
Environmental Policy Act of 1969 (NEPA) (42 U.S.C. 4321-4370f), and
have made a preliminary determination that this action is one of a
category of actions that do not individually or cumulatively have a
significant effect on the human environment. This proposed rule is
categorically excluded, under figure 2-1, paragraph (34)(g), of the
Commandant Instruction because it involves the establishment of a
special local regulation. A preliminary environmental analysis
checklist supporting this determination is available in the docket
where indicated under ADDRESSES. We seek any comments or information
that may lead to the discovery of a significant environmental impact
from this proposed rule.

List of Subjects in 33 CFR Part 100

    Marine Safety, Navigation (water), Reporting and record keeping
requirements, Waterways.

    For the reasons discussed in the preamble, the Coast Guard proposes
to amend 33 CFR part 100 as follows:

PART 100--SAFETY OF LIFE ON NAVIGABLE WATERS

0
1. The authority citation for part 100 continues to read as follows:

    Authority:  33 U.S.C. 1233.

0
2. Add Sec.  100.927 to read as follows:

Sec.  100.927  Special Local Regulations, Partnership in Education,
Dragon Boat Festival, Toledo, OH.

    (a) Regulated area. The regulated area includes all U.S. navigable
waters of the Maumee River, Toledo, OH, between a line starting from a
point on land just north of the Cherry Street Bridge at position
41[deg]39'5.27'' N; 083[deg]31'34.01'' W straight across the river
along the Cherry Street bridge to position 41[deg]39'12.83'' N;
083[deg]31'42.58'' W and a line extending from a point of land just
south of International Park at position 41[deg]38'46.62'' N;
083[deg]31'50.54'' W straight across the river to the shore just south
of the mouth of Swan Creek at position 41[deg]38'47.37'' N;
083[deg]32'2.05'' W (NAD 83).
    (b) Enforcement period. This section will be enforced annually on
the third or fourth Saturday of July. The exact dates and times would
be issued annually via a Notice of Enforcement.
    (c) Special Local Regulations. (1) The Coast Guard will patrol the
regatta area under the direction of a designated Coast Guard Patrol
Commander. Vessels desiring to transit the regulated area may do so
only with prior approval of the Patrol Commander and when so directed
by that officer. Vessels will be operated at a no wake speed to reduce
the wake to a minimum, in a manner which will not endanger participants
in the event or any other craft and remain vigilant for event
participants and safety craft. Additionally, vessels must yield right-
of-way for event participants and event safety craft and must follow
directions given by the Coast Guard's Patrol Commander. The rules
contained in the above two sentences do not apply to participants in
the event or vessels of the patrol operating in the performance

of their assigned duties. Commercial vessels will have right-of-way
over event participants and event safety craft. The races will stop for
oncoming freighter or commercial traffic and will resume after the
vessel has completed its passage through the regulated area. The Patrol
Commander may direct the anchoring, mooring, or movement of any boat or
vessel within the regatta area. A succession of sharp, short signals by
whistle or horn from vessels patrolling the area under the direction of
the U.S. Coast Guard Patrol Commander shall serve as a signal to stop.
Vessels so signaled must stop and comply with the orders of the Patrol
Commander. Failure to do so may result in expulsion from the area,
citation for failure to comply, or both. The Patrol Commander may
establish vessel size and speed limitations and operating conditions
and may restrict vessel operation within the regatta area to vessels
having particular operating characteristics. The Patrol Commander may
terminate the marine event or the operation of any vessel at any time
it is deemed necessary for the protection of life and property.
    (2) Patrol Commander means a Coast Guard commissioned, warrant, or
petty officer who has been designated by the Captain of the Port to
monitor a regatta area, permit entry into the regatta area, give
legally enforceable orders to persons or vessels within the regatta
area, and take other actions authorized by the Captain of the Port. The
Patrol Commander will be aboard either a Coast Guard or Coast Guard
Auxiliary vessel. The Patrol Commander may be contacted on Channel 16
(156.8 MHZ) by the call sign ``Coast Guard Patrol Commander.''
0
3. Add Sec.  100.928 to read as follows:

Sec.  100.928  Special Local Regulations, Frogtown Race Regatta,
Toledo, OH.

    (a) Regulated Area. The regulated area includes all U.S. navigable
waters of the Maumee River, Toledo, OH, from the Norfolk and Southern
Railway Bridge at River Mile 1.80 to the Anthony Wayne Bridge at River
Mile 5.16.
    (b) Enforcement period. This section will be enforced annually on
the third or fourth Saturday of September. The exact dates and times
would be issued annually via a Notice of Enforcement.
    (c) Special Local Regulations. (1) The Coast Guard will patrol the
regatta area under the direction of a designated Coast Guard Patrol
Commander. Vessels desiring to transit the regulated area may do so
only with prior approval of the Patrol Commander and when so directed
by that officer. Vessels will be operated at a no wake speed to reduce
the wake to a minimum, in a manner which will not endanger participants
in the event or any other craft and remain vigilant for event
participants and safety craft. Additionally, vessels must yield right-
of-way for event participants and event safety craft and must follow
directions given by the Coast Guard's Patrol Commander. The rules
contained in the above two sentences do not apply to participants in
the event or vessels of the patrol operating in the performance of
their assigned duties. Commercial vessels will have right-of-way over
event participants and event safety craft. The races will stop for
oncoming freighter or commercial traffic and will resume after the
vessel has completed its passage through the regulated area. The Patrol
Commander may direct the anchoring, mooring, or movement of any boat or
vessel within the regatta area. A succession of sharp, short signals by
whistle or horn from vessels patrolling the area under the direction of
the U.S. Coast Guard Patrol Commander shall serve as a signal to stop.
Vessels so signaled must stop and comply with the orders of the Patrol
Commander. Failure to do so may result in expulsion from the area,
citation for failure to comply, or both. The Patrol Commander may
establish vessel size and speed limitations and operating conditions
and may restrict vessel operation within the regatta area to vessels
having particular operating characteristics. The Patrol Commander may
terminate the marine event or the operation of any vessel at any time
it is deemed necessary for the protection of life and property.
    (2) Patrol Commander means a Coast Guard commissioned, warrant, or
petty officer who has been designated by the Captain of the Port to
monitor a regatta area, permit entry into the regatta area, give
legally enforceable orders to persons or vessels within the regatta
area, and take other actions authorized by the Captain of the Port. The
Patrol Commander will be aboard either a Coast Guard or Coast Guard
Auxiliary vessel. The Patrol Commander may be contacted on Channel 16
(156.8 MHZ) by the call sign ``Coast Guard Patrol Commander.''

    Dated: April 28, 2014.
J.E. Ogden,
Captain, U.S. Coast Guard, Captain of the Port Detroit.
[FR Doc. 2014-10625 Filed 5-8-14; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 9110-04-P


[Federal Register: August 12, 2008 (Volume 73, Number 156)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Page 46809-46811]
[DOCID:fr12au08-4]

=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY

Federal Emergency Management Agency

44 CFR Part 65

[Docket No. FEMA-B-7797]

Changes in Flood Elevation Determinations

AGENCY: Federal Emergency Management Agency, DHS.

ACTION: Interim rule.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: This interim rule lists communities where modification of the
Base (1% annual-chance) Flood Elevations (BFEs) is appropriate because
of new scientific or technical data. New flood insurance premium rates
will be calculated from the modified BFEs for new buildings and their
contents.

DATES: These modified BFEs are currently in effect on the dates listed
in the table below and revise the Flood Insurance Rate Maps (FIRMs) in
effect prior to this determination for the listed communities.
    From the date of the second publication of these changes in a
newspaper of local circulation, any person has ninety (90) days in
which to request through the community that the Mitigation Assistant
Administrator of FEMA reconsider the changes. The modified BFEs may be
changed during the 90-day period.

ADDRESSES: The modified BFEs for each community are available for
inspection at the office of the Chief Executive Officer of each
community. The respective addresses are listed in the table below.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: William R. Blanton, Jr., Engineering
Management Branch, Mitigation Directorate, Federal Emergency Management
Agency, 500 C Street SW., Washington, DC 20472,<PHONE_NUMBER>.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The modified BFEs are not listed for each
community in this interim rule. However, the address of the Chief
Executive Officer of the community where the modified BFE
determinations are available for inspection is provided.
    Any request for reconsideration must be based on knowledge of
changed conditions or new scientific or technical data.
    The modifications are made pursuant to section 201 of the Flood
Disaster Protection Act of 1973, 42 U.S.C. 4105, and are in accordance
with the National Flood Insurance Act of 1968, 42 U.S.C. 4001 et seq.,
and with 44 CFR part 65.

    For rating purposes, the currently effective community number is
shown and must be used for all new policies and renewals.
    The modified BFEs are the basis for the floodplain management
measures that the community is required to either adopt or to show
evidence of being already in effect in order to qualify or to remain
qualified for participation in the National Flood Insurance Program
(NFIP).
    These modified BFEs, together with the floodplain management
criteria required by 44 CFR 60.3, are the minimum that are required.
They should not be construed to mean that the community must change any
existing ordinances that are more stringent in their floodplain
management requirements. The community may at any time enact stricter
requirements of its own, or pursuant to policies established by the
other Federal, State, or regional entities. The changes BFEs are in
accordance with 44 CFR 65.4.
    National Environmental Policy Act. This interim rule is
categorically excluded from the requirements of 44 CFR part 10,
Environmental Consideration. An environmental impact assessment has not
been prepared.
    Regulatory Flexibility Act. As flood elevation determinations are
not within the scope of the Regulatory Flexibility Act, 5 U.S.C. 601-
612, a regulatory flexibility analysis is not required.
    Regulatory Classification. This interim rule is not a significant
regulatory action under the criteria of section 3(f) of Executive Order
12866 of September 30, 1993, Regulatory Planning and Review, 58 FR
51735.
    Executive Order 13132, Federalism. This interim rule involves no
policies that have federalism implications under Executive Order 13132,
Federalism.
    Executive Order 12988, Civil Justice Reform. This interim rule
meets the applicable standards of Executive Order 12988.

List of Subjects in 44 CFR Part 65

    Flood insurance, Floodplains, Reporting and recordkeeping
requirements.

0
Accordingly, 44 CFR part 65 is amended to read as follows:

PART 65--[AMENDED]

0
1. The authority citation for part 65 continues to read as follows:

    Authority: 42 U.S.C. 4001 et seq.; Reorganization Plan No. 3 of
1978, 3 CFR, 1978 Comp., p. 329; E.O. 12127, 44 FR 19367, 3 CFR,
1979 Comp., p. 376.

Sec.  65.4  [Amended]

0
2. The tables published under the authority of Sec.  65.4 are amended
as follows:

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
                                                             Date and name of
         State and county           Location and case No.     newspaper where     Chief executive officer   Effective date of  modification   Community
                                                           notice was published         of community                                             No.
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Alabama: Jefferson................  City of Birmingham     June 20, 2008; June   The Honorable Larry P.     July 28, 2008..................       010116
                                     (08-04-2759P).         27, 2008; The         Langford, Mayor, City of
                                                            Birmingham News.      Birmingham, 710 North
                                                                                20th Street, Birmingham,
                                                                                AL 35203.
Colorado: Adams...................  City of Thornton (08-  June 5, 2008; June    The Honorable Erik         October 10, 2008...............       080007
                                     08-0377P).             12, 2008;             Hansen, Mayor, City of
                                                            Northglenn-Thornton   Thornton, 9500 Civic
                                                            Sentinel.             Center Drive, Thornton,
                                                                                CO 80229.
Connecticut: Hartford.............  City of Bristol (08-   June 25, 2008; July   The Honorable Arthur       June 11, 2008..................       090023
                                     01-0505P).             2, 2008; The          Ward, Mayor, City of
                                                            Hartford Courant.     Bristol, City Hall, 111
                                                                                North Main Street,
                                                                                Bristol, CT 06010.
Florida: Seminole.................  City of Winter         June 18, 2008; June   The Honorable John F.      October 23, 2008...............       120295
                                     Springs (08-04-        25, 2008; Orlando     Bush, Mayor, City of
                                     4157P).                Sentinel.             Winter Springs, 21
                                                                                Tarpon Circle, Winter
                                                                                Springs, FL 32708.
Hawaii: Maui......................  Unincorporated areas   February 21. 2008;    The Honorable Charmaine    February 12, 2008..............       150003
                                     of Maui County (07-    February 28, 2008;    Tavares, Mayor, Maui
                                     09-1848P).             Maui News.            County, 200 South High
                                                                                Street, Wailuku, HI
                                                                                96793.
Idaho: Madison....................  Unincorporated areas   July 3, 2008; July    The Honorable Ralph        June 16, 2008..................       160217
                                     of Madison County      10, 2008; Standard    Robison, Chairman,
                                     (08-10-0206P).         Journal.              Madison County, Board of
                                                                                Commissioners, P.O. Box
                                                                                389, Rexburg, ID 83440.
Illinois:
    Lake..........................  Unincorporated areas   June 5, 2008; June    The Honorable Suzi         October 10, 2008...............       170357
                                     of Lake County (08-    12, 2008; Lake        Schmidt, Chair, Lake
                                     05-1098P).             County News-Sun.      County Board, 18 North
                                                                                County Street, Room
                                                                                1001, Waukegan, IL 60085.
    Lake..........................  Village of Lake        June 5, 2008; June    The Honorable Kevin        October 10, 2008...............       170372
                                     Barrington (08-05-     12, 2008; Lake        Richardson, President,
                                     1098P).                County News-Sun.      Village of Lake
                                                                                Barrington, 23860 Old
                                                                                Barrington Road, Lake
                                                                                Barrington, IL 60010.
    Lake..........................  Village of North       June 5, 2008; June    The Honorable Bruce J.     October 10, 2008...............       170383
                                     Barrington (08-05-     12, 2008; Lake        Sauer, President,
                                     1098P).                County News-Sun.      Village of North
                                                                                Barrington, 111 Old
                                                                                Barrington Road, North
                                                                                Barrington, IL 60010.
Minnesota: Anoka..................  City of Blaine (08-05- June 6, 2008; June    The Honorable Thomas       October 13, 2008...............       270007
                                     1446P).                13, 2008; Blaine-     Ryan, Mayor, City of
                                                            Spring Lake Park      Blaine, 10801 Town
                                                            Life.                 Square Drive Northeast,
                                                                                Blaine, MN 55449.
Missouri:
    St. Charles County............  Unincorporated areas   June 25, 2008; July   The Honorable Steve        October 30, 2008...............       290315
                                     of St. Charles         2, 2008; St.          Ehlmann, County
                                     County (08-07-0068P).  Charles Journal.      Executive, St. Charles
                                                                                County, St. Charles
                                                                                County Courthouse, 100
                                                                                North Third Street, St.
                                                                                Charles, MO 63301.
    St. Charles County............  City of St. Peters     June 25, 2008; July   The Honorable Len Pagano,  October 30, 2008...............       290319
                                     (08-07-0068P).         2, 2008; St.          Mayor, City of St.
                                                            Charles Journal.      Peters, One St. Peters
                                                                                Centre Boulevard, St.
                                                                                Peters, MO 63376.
Montana: Flathead.................  Unincorporated areas   June 13, 2008; June   The Honorable Gary D.      June 2, 2008...................       300023
                                     of Flathead County     20, 2008; Daily       Hall, Chairman, Flathead
                                     (08-08-0430P).         Inter Lake.           County, Board of
                                                                                Commissioners, 800 South
                                                                                Main Street, Kalispell,
                                                                                MT 59901.

Nevada: Clark.....................  Unincorporated areas   July 8, 2008; July    The Honorable Rory Reid,   November 12, 2008..............       320003
                                     of Clark County (07-   15, 2008; Las Vegas   Chair, Clark County
                                     09-1612P).             Review-Journal.       Board of Commissioners,
                                                                                500 South Grand Central
                                                                                Parkway, Las Vegas, NV
                                                                                89106.
Pennsylvania:
    Lackawanna....................  City of Scranton (07-  April 28, 2008; May   The Honorable Christopher  September 2, 2008..............       420538
                                     03-0177P).             5, 2008; The          A. Doherty, Mayor, City
                                                            Scranton Times        of Scranton, 340 North
                                                            Tribune.              Washington Avenue,
                                                                                Scranton, PA 18503.
    Lackawanna....................  Borough of Taylor (07- April 28, 2008; May   The Honorable Richard      September 2, 2008..............       420539
                                     03-0177P).             5, 2008; The          Bowen, Mayor, Borough of
                                                            Scranton Times        Taylor, 122 Union
                                                            Tribune.              Street, Taylor, PA 18517.
Tennessee:
    Coffee........................  City of Tullahoma (07- May 14, 2008; May     The Honorable Troy Bisby,  September 18, 2008.............       470036
                                     04-5627P).             21, 2008; The         Mayor, City of
                                                            Tullahoma News.       Tullahoma, 201 West
                                                                                Grundy Street,
                                                                                Tullahoma, TN 37388.
    Wilson........................  City of Lebanon (08-   May 28, 2008; June    The Honorable Robert       May 16, 2008...................       270208
                                     04-1439P).             4, 2008; The Wilson   Dedman, Mayor, Wilson
                                                            Post.                 County, 228 East Main
                                                                                Street, Room 104,
                                                                                Lebanon, TN 37087.
Texas:
    Bexar.........................  City of San Antonio    June 26, 2008; July   The Honorable Phil         October 31, 2008...............       480045
                                     (07-06-0823P).         3, 2008; San          Hardberger, Mayor, City
                                                            Antonio Express       of San Antonio, P.O. Box
                                                            News.                 839966, San Antonio, TX
                                                                                78283.
    Collin........................  City of McKinney (07-  June 26, 2008; July   The Honorable Bill         October 31, 2008...............       480135
                                     06-1407P).             3, 2008; McKinney     Whitfield, Mayor, City
                                                            Courier Gazette.      of McKinney, 222 North
                                                                                Tennessee Street,
                                                                                McKinney, TX 75069.
    Ellis.........................  City of Waxahachie     May 28, 2008; June    The Honorable Joe          October 2, 2008................       480211
                                     (08-06-0662P).         4, 2008; Waxahachie   Jenkins, Mayor, City of
                                                            Daily Light.          Waxahachie, P.O. Box
                                                                                757, Waxahachie, TX
                                                                                75165.
     Harris.......................  Unincorporated areas   July 2, 2008; July    The Honorable Ed Emmett,   October 30, 2008...............       480287
                                     of Harris County (07-  9, 2008; Houston      Harris County Judge,
                                     06-2077P).             Chronicle.            1001 Preston Street,
                                                                                Suite 911, Houston, TX
                                                                                77002.
    Tarrant.......................  City of Fort Worth     May 30, 2008; June    The Honorable Michael J.   September 29, 2008.............       480596
                                     (07-06-2613P).         6, 2008; Fort Worth   Moncrief, Mayor, City of
                                                            Star-Telegram.        Fort Worth, 1000
                                                                                Throckmorton Street,
                                                                                Fort Worth, TX 76102.
Virginia: Independent City........  City of Winchester     May 8, 2008; May 15,  The Honorable Elizabeth    September 12, 2008.............       510173
                                     (08-03-0801P).         2008; The             Minor, Mayor, City of
                                                            Winchester Star.      Winchester, 231 East
                                                                                Piccadilly Street, Suite
                                                                                310, Winchester, VA
                                                                                22601.
Wisconsin:
    Dodge.........................  Unincorporated areas   June 19, 2008; June   The Honorable Russell E.   October 24, 2008...............       550094
                                     of Dodge County (07-   26, 2008; Watertown   Kottke, Chairman, Dodge
                                     05-4832P).             Daily Times.          County, Board of
                                                                                Supervisors, 127 East
                                                                                Oak Street, Beaver Dam,
                                                                                WI 53039.
    Dodge.........................  City of Watertown (07- June 19, 2008; June   The Honorable Ron          October 24, 2008...............       550107
                                     05-4832P).             26, 2008; Watertown   Krueger, Mayor, City of
                                                            Daily Times.          Watertown, P.O. Box 477,
                                                                                Watertown, WI 53094.
    Ozaukee.......................  Unincorporated areas   June 5, 2008; June    The Honorable Robert       October 10, 2008...............       550310
                                     of Ozaukee County      12, 2008; Ozaukee     Brooks, Chairman,
                                     (08-05-1362P).         Press.                Ozaukee County Board,
                                                                                P.O. Box 994, Port
                                                                                Washington, WI 53074-
                                                                                0994.
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

(Catalog of Federal Domestic Assistance No. 97.022, ``Flood
Insurance.'')

    Dated: July 25, 2008.
Edward L. Connor,
Deputy Assistant Administrator for Insurance, Department of Homeland
Security, Federal Emergency Management Agency.
[FR Doc. E8-18530 Filed 8-11-08; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 9110-12-P


[Federal Register Volume 81, Number 187 (Tuesday, September 27, 2016)]
[Notices]
[Page 66271]
[FR Doc No: 2016-23234]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission

[Docket No. ID-8007-000]

Burke, John J., Jr.; Notice of Filing

    Take notice that on September 19, 2016, John J. Burke, Jr.
submitted for filing, an application for authority to hold interlocking
positions, pursuant to section 305(b) of the Federal Power Act (FPA),
16 U.S.C. 825d(b), Part 45 of the Federal Energy Regulatory
Commission's (Commission) Rules of Practice and Procedure, 18 CFR part
45, and Order No. 664.\1\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \1\ Commission Authorization to Hold Interlocking Positions, 112
FERC ] 61,298 (2005) (Order No. 664); order on reh'g, 114 FERC ]
61,142 (2006) (Order No. 664-A).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    Any person desiring to intervene or to protest this filing must
file in accordance with Rules 211 and 214 of the Commission's Rules of
Practice and Procedure (18 CFR 385.211, 385.214). Protests will be
considered by the Commission in determining the appropriate action to
be taken, but will not serve to make protestants parties to the
proceeding. Any person wishing to become a party must file a notice of
intervention or motion to intervene, as appropriate. Such notices,
motions, or protests must be filed on or before the comment date. On or
before the comment date, it is not necessary to serve motions to
intervene or protests on persons other than the Applicant.
    The Commission encourages electronic submission of protests and
interventions in lieu of paper using the ``eFiling'' link at http://www.ferc.gov. Persons unable to file electronically should submit an
original and 5 copies of the protest or intervention to the Federal
Energy Regulatory Commission, 888 First Street NE., Washington, DC
20426.
    This filing is accessible on-line at http://www.ferc.gov, using the
``eLibrary'' link and is available for electronic review in the
Commission's Public Reference Room in Washington, DC. There is an
``eSubscription'' link on the Web site that enables subscribers to
receive email notification when a document is added to a subscribed
docket(s). For assistance with any FERC Online service, please email
<EMAIL_ADDRESS>or call<PHONE_NUMBER> (toll free). For
TTY, call<PHONE_NUMBER>.
    Comment Date: 5:00 p.m. Eastern Time on October 11, 2016.

    Dated: September 19, 2016.
Kimberly D. Bose,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2016-23234 Filed 9-26-16; 8:45 am]
 BILLING CODE 6717-01-P


[Federal Register Volume 78, Number 74 (Wednesday, April 17, 2013)]
[Notices]
[Pages 22922-22923]
[FR Doc No: 2013-08975]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

Submission for OMB Review; Comment Request

Upon Written Request, Copies Available From: Securities and Exchange
Commission, Office of Investor Education and Advocacy, Washington, DC
20549-0213.

Extension: Rule 0-4.
    OMB Control No. 3235-0633, SEC File No. 270-569.

    Notice is hereby given that, pursuant to the Paperwork Reduction
Act of 1995 (44 U.S.C. 3501 et seq.), the Securities and Exchange
Commission (the ``Commission'') is soliciting comments on the
collection of information summarized below. The Commission plans to
submit this collection of information to the Office of Management and
Budget for extension and approval.
    Rule 0-4 (17 CFR 275.0-4) under the Investment Advisers Act of 1940
(``Act'' or ``Advisers Act'') (15 U.S.C. 80b-1 et seq.) entitled
``General Requirements of Papers and Applications,'' prescribes general
instructions for filing an application seeking exemptive relief with
the Commission. Rule 0-4 currently requires that every application for
an order for which a form is not specifically prescribed and which is
executed by a corporation, partnership or other company and filed with
the Commission contain a statement of the applicable provisions of the
articles of incorporation, bylaws or similar documents, relating to the
right of the person signing and filing such application to take such
action on behalf of the applicant, and a statement that all such
requirements have been complied with and that the person signing and
filing the application is fully authorized to do so. If such
authorization is dependent on resolutions of stockholders, directors,
or other bodies, such resolutions must be attached as an

exhibit to or quoted in the application. Any amendment to the
application must contain a similar statement as to the applicability of
the original statement of authorization. When any application or
amendment is signed by an agent or attorney, rule 0-4 requires that the
power of attorney evidencing his authority to sign shall state the
basis for the agent's authority and shall be filed with the Commission.
Every application subject to rule 0-4 must be verified by the person
executing the application by providing a notarized signature in
substantially the form specified in the rule. Each application subject
to rule 0-4 must state the reasons why the applicant is deemed to be
entitled to the action requested with a reference to the provisions of
the Act and rules thereunder, the name and address of each applicant,
and the name and address of any person to whom any questions regarding
the application should be directed. Rule 0-4 requires that a proposed
notice of the proceeding initiated by the filing of the application
accompany each application as an exhibit and, if necessary, be modified
to reflect any amendment to the application.
    The requirements of rule 0-4 are designed to provide Commission
staff with the necessary information to assess whether granting the
orders of exemption are necessary and appropriate in the public
interest and consistent with the protection of investors and the
intended purposes of the Act.
    Applicants for orders under the Advisers Act can include registered
investment advisers, affiliated persons of registered investment
advisers, and entities seeking to avoid investment adviser status,
among others. Commission staff estimates that it receives up to 9
applications per year submitted under rule 0-4 of the Act seeking
relief from various provisions of the Advisers Act and, in addition, up
to 7 applications per year submitted under Advisers Act rule 206(4)-5,
which addresses certain ``pay to play'' practices and also provides the
Commission the authority to grant applications seeking relief from
certain of the rule's restrictions. Although each application typically
is submitted on behalf of multiple applicants, the applicants in the
vast majority of cases are related entities and are treated as a single
respondent for purposes of this analysis. Most of the work of preparing
an application is performed by outside counsel and, therefore, imposes
no hourly burden on respondents. The cost outside counsel charges
applicants depends on the complexity of the issues covered by the
application and the time required. Based on conversations with
applicants and attorneys, and recent analyses by the Commission,\1\ the
cost for applications ranges from approximately $12,800 for preparing a
well-precedented, routine (or otherwise less involved) application to
approximately $200,000 to prepare a complex or novel application. We
estimate that the Commission receives 2 of the most time-consuming
applications annually, 4 applications of medium difficulty, and 10 of
the least difficult applications subject to rule 0-4.\2\ This
distribution gives a total estimated annual cost burden to applicants
of filing all applications of $702,000 [(2x$200,000) + (4x$43,500) +
(10x$12,800)]. The estimate of annual cost burden is made solely for
the purposes of the Paperwork Reduction Act, and is not derived from a
comprehensive or even representative survey or study of the costs of
Commission rules and forms.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \1\ See Family Offices, Investment Advisers Act Release No. 3220
(June 22, 2011), at section IV.A (``We estimate that a typical
family office will incur legal fees of $200,000 on average to engage
in the exemptive order application process, including preparation
and revision of an application and consultations with Commission
staff.'') Although the Commission may receive fewer exemptive
applications from family offices in light of rule 202(a)(11)(G)-1,
which defines family offices that are now excluded from regulation
under the Advisers Act, the costs to prepare family office
applications may be representative of the costs required to prepare
other more complex and novel applications. See also Political
Contributions by Certain Investment Advisers, Investment Advisers
Act Release No. 3043 (July 1, 2010), at section V.D. (estimating
that applications filed under Advisers Act rule 206(4)-5 ``will cost
approximately $12,800'').
    \2\ The estimated 10 least difficult applications include the
estimated 7 applications per year submitted under Advisers Act rule
206(4)-5. The Commission previously estimated that these
applications will cost approximately $12,800 each. Id.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    The requirements of this collection of information are required to
obtain or retain benefits. Responses will not be kept confidential. An
agency may not conduct or sponsor, and a person is not required to
respond to a collection of information unless it displays a currently
valid control number.
    Written comments are invited on: (a) Whether the proposed
collection of information is necessary for the proper performance of
the functions of the agency, including whether the information will
have practical utility; (b) the accuracy of the agency's estimate of
the burden of the collection of information; (c) ways to enhance the
quality, utility, and clarity of the information collected; and (d)
ways to minimize the burden of the collection of information on
respondents, including through the use of automated collection
techniques or other forms of information technology. Consideration will
be given to comments and suggestions submitted in writing within 60
days of this publication.
    Please direct your written comments to Thomas Bayer, Chief
Information Officer, Securities and Exchange Commission, c/o Remi
Pavlik-Simon, 6432 General Green Way, Alexandria, VA 22312; or send an
email to<EMAIL_ADDRESS>
    Dated: April 11, 2013.
Kevin M. O'Neill,
Deputy Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2013-08975 Filed 4-16-13; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 8011-01-P


[Federal Register: August 6, 2010 (Volume 75, Number 151)]
[Notices]
[Page 47662-47664]
[DOCID:fr06au10-144]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

[Release No. 34-62618; File No. SR-NASDAQ-2010-088]

Self-Regulatory Organizations; The NASDAQ Stock Market LLC;
Notice of Filing and Immediate Effectiveness of Proposed Rule Change
Relating to Fees for Routing to Away Markets

July 30, 2010.
    Pursuant to Section 19(b)(1) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934
(``Act'') \1\ and Rule 19b-4 thereunder,\2\ notice is hereby given that
on July 22, 2010, The NASDAQ Stock Market LLC (``NASDAQ'' or
``Exchange'') filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission
(``SEC'' or ``Commission'') the proposed rule change as described in
Items I and II below, which Items have been prepared by the Exchange.
The Commission is publishing this notice to solicit comments on the
proposed rule change from interested persons.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \1\ 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(1).
    \2\ 17 CFR 240.19b-4.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

I. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement of the Terms of Substance
of the Proposed Rule Change

    The Exchange proposes to modify Rule 7050 governing pricing for
NASDAQ members using the NASDAQ Options Market (``NOM''), NASDAQ's
facility for executing and routing standardized equity and index
options.
    While changes to the Fee Schedule pursuant to this proposal are
effective upon filing, the Exchange has designated these changes to be
operative on August 2, 2010.
    The text of the proposed rule change is set forth below. Proposed
new text is in italics and deleted text is in brackets.\3\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \3\ The proposed text reflects recent amendments to Rule 7050,
specifically proposed rule change SR-NASDAQ-2010-090.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

* * * * *

7050. NASDAQ Options Market

    The following charges shall apply to the use of the order execution
and routing services of the NASDAQ Options Market for all securities.
    (1)-(3) No Change.
    (4) Fees for routing contracts to markets other than the NASDAQ
Options Market shall be assessed as provided below. The current fees
and a historical record of applicable fees shall be posted on the
NasdaqTrader.com website.

------------------------------------------------------------------------

------------------------------------------------------------------------
                  Exchange                         Customer Firm MM
------------------------------------------------------------------------
BATS.......................................      $0.36       $0.55 $0.55
BOX........................................      $0.06       $0.55 $0.55
CBOE.......................................      $0.06       $0.55 $0.55
ISE........................................      $0.06       $0.55 $0.55
ISE Select Symbols* of 100 or more               $0.26       $0.55 $0.55
 contracts.................................
NYSE Arca Penny Pilot......................      $0.50       $0.55 $0.55
NYSE Arca Non Penny Pilot..................      $0.06       $0.55 $0.55
NYSE AMEX..................................      $0.06       $0.55 $0.55
PHLX (for all options other than PHLX            $0.06       $0.55 $0.55
 Select Symbols [the below listed options])

PHLX Select Symbols** [(for the following        $0.30       $0.55 $0.55
 options only): AA, AAPL, ABK, ABX, AIG,
 ALL, AMD, AMR, AMZN, ARIA, AXP, BAC, BRCD,
 C, CAT, CIEN, CIGX, CSCO, DELL, DIA, DNDN,
 DRYS, EBAY, EK, F, FAS, FAZ, GDX, GE, GLD,
 GLW, GS, HAL, IBM, INTC, IWM, IYR, JPM,
 LVS, MGM, MOT, MSFT, MU, NEM, NOK, NVDA,
 ONNN, ORCL, PALM, PFE, POT, QCOM, QID,
 QQQQ, RIG, RIMM, RMBS, SBUX, SDS, SIRI,
 SKF, SLV, SMH, SNDK, SPY, T, TBT, TZA,
 UAUA, UNG, USO, UYG, V, VALE, VZ, WYNN, X,
 XHB, XLF, XRX and YHOO]...................
------------------------------------------------------------------------
* These fees are applicable to orders routed to ISE that are subject to
  Rebates and Fees for Adding and Removing Liquidity in Select Symbols.
  See ISE's Schedule of Fees for the complete list of symbols that are
  subject to these fees.
** These fees are applicable to orders routed to PHLX that are subject
  to Rebates and Fees for Adding and Removing Liquidity in Select
  Symbols. See PHLX's Fee Schedule for the complete list of symbols that
  are subject to these fees.

* * * * *
    The text of the proposed rule change is available on the Exchange's
Web site at http://www.nasdaqomx.cchwallstreet.com, at the principal
office of the Exchange, and at the Commission's Public Reference Room.

II. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement of the Purpose of, and
Statutory Basis for, the Proposed Rule Change

    In its filing with the Commission, the Exchange included statements
concerning the purpose of, and basis for, the proposed rule change and
discussed any comments it received on the proposed rule change. The
text of these statements may be examined at the places specified in
Item IV below. The Exchange has prepared summaries, set forth in
Sections A, B, and C below, of the most significant aspects of such
statements.

A. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement of the Purpose of, and
Statutory Basis for, the Proposed Rule Change

1. Purpose
    NASDAQ is proposing to modify Rule 7050 governing the fees assessed
for options orders entered into NOM but routed to and executed on away
markets (``routing fees''). NASDAQ Options Services LLC (``NOS''), a
member of the Exchange, is the Exchange's exclusive order router. Each
time NOS routes to away markets NOS is charged a $0.06 clearing fee
and, in the case of certain exchanges, a transaction fee is also
charged in certain symbols, which are passed through to the Exchange.
NOM currently assesses customers a fee of $0.30 and Firms and Market
Makers a fee of $0.55 for routing options orders to NASDAQ OMX PHLX,
Inc. (``PHLX'') in certain select symbols that are subject to PHLX's
Rebates and Fees for Adding and Removing Liquidity in Select
Symbols.\4\ The Exchange proposes to modify Rule 7050 by titling those
fees ``PHLX Select Symbols'' and adding clarifying language to indicate
those fees would be subject to PHLX's Rebates and Fees for Adding and
Removing Liquidity in Select Symbols, rather than listing all of the
option symbols that are subject to those fees. The Exchange is
proposing to amend the title in Rule 7050 so that the PHLX select
symbols fees would apply to all of the symbols in PHLX's list of
symbols which are subject to the Rebates and Fees for Adding and
Removing Liquidity in Select Symbols.\5\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \4\ NOM currently assesses the aforementioned rates in the
following symbols: AA, AAPL, ABK, ABX, AIG, ALL, AMD, AMR, AMZN,
ARIA, AXP, BAC, BRCD, C, CAT, CIEN, CIGX, CSCO, DELL, DIA, DNDN,
DRYS, EBAY, EK, F, FAS, FAZ, GDX, GE, GLD, GLW, GS, HAL, IBM, INTC,
IWM, IYR, JPM, LVS, MGM, MOT, MSFT, MU, NEM, NOK, NVDA, ONNN, ORCL,
PALM, PFE, POT, QCOM, QID, QQQQ, RIG, RIMM, RMBS, SBUX, SDS, SIRI,
SKF, SLV, SMH, SNDK, SPY, T, TBT, TZA, UAUA, UNG, USO, UYG, V, VALE,
VZ, WYNN, X, XHB, XLF, XRX and YHOO.
    \5\ PHLX recently filed a proposed rule change to add the
following four options to the Phlx's list of symbols subject to the
Rebates and Fees for Adding and Removing Liquidity in Select
Symbols: BP p.l.c. Common Stock (``BP''), Baidu, Inc. (``BIDU''),
IShares FTSE/Xinhua China 25 Index (``FXI'') and Exxon Mobil Corp.
(``XOM'') and also remove the following three options: ARIAD
Pharmaceuticals, Inc. (``ARIA''), Star Scientific, Inc. (``CIGX'')
and Palm, Inc. (``PALM'') from its list of Select Symbols. See SR-
Phlx-2010-98. All symbols subject to PHLX's Rebates and Fees for
Adding and Removing Liquidity in Select Symbols will be referred to
as ``PHLX Select Symbols.''
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    The Exchange also proposes to amend text in Rule 7050 to clarify
that orders which are currently subject to ``PHLX (for all options
other than the below listed options)'' routing fees would be renamed to
state ``PHLX (for all options other than PHLX Select Symbols)'' to
clarify that these fees would continue to apply to all orders routed to
PHLX and not subject to PHLX's Rebates and Fees for Adding and Removing
Liquidity in Select Symbols.\6\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \6\ Currently NOM assesses $0.06 for Customers and $0.55 for
Firms and Market Makers for routing orders to PHLX which are not
subject to PHLX's Rebates and Fees for Adding and Removing Liquidity
in Select Symbols.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    NASDAQ Options Services LLC (``NOS''), a member of the Exchange, is
the Exchange's exclusive order router. Each time NOS routes to away
markets, NOS is charged a $0.06 clearing fee and, in the case of
certain exchanges, a transaction fee is also charged in certain
symbols, which are passed through to the Exchange. The Exchange
collects fees for routing to away markets in order to recoup clearing
and transaction charges incurred by the Exchange when such orders are
routed to various destination markets. Each destination market's
transaction charge varies and there is a standard clearing charge for
each transaction incurred by the Exchange.
    While changes to the Fee Schedule pursuant to this proposal are
effective upon filing, the Exchange has designated these changes to be
operative on August 2, 2010.
2. Statutory Basis
    NASDAQ believes that the proposed rule changes are consistent with
the provisions of Section 6 of the Act,\7\ in general, and with Section
6(b)(4) of the Act,\8\ in particular, in that it provides for the
equitable allocation of reasonable dues, fees and other charges among
members and issuers and other persons using any facility or system
which NASDAQ operates or controls. The Exchange believes that the
proposed fee changes are reasonable because the Exchange is seeking to
recoup the costs incurred for options orders entered into NOM but
routed to and executed on PHLX in any symbol subject to PHLX's Rebates
and Fees for Adding and Removing Liquidity in Select Symbols. This
proposal would continue to apply to all of the PHLX Select Symbols, as
defined on PHLX's Fee Schedule, going forward rather than listing each
symbol in Rule 7050. The Exchange believes this amendment to Rule 7050
is reasonable because it continues to assess the same fees for routing
orders to PHLX which are subject to PHLX's Rebates and Fees for Adding
and Removing Liquidity in Select Symbols. This proposal is simply
renaming those routing fees without changing the fees. Also, the
proposal is equitable because the fees assessed to Customers, Firms and
Market Makers will continue to apply to those market participants and
the modifications to the title of the PHLX Select Symbols routing fees
will

be uniformly applied to each of these participants.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \7\ 15 U.S.C. 78f.
    \8\ 15 U.S.C. 78f(b)(4).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    NASDAQ is one of eight options market in the national market system
for standardized options. Joining NASDAQ and electing to trade options
is entirely voluntary. Under these circumstances, NASDAQ's fees must be
competitive and low in order for NASDAQ to attract order flow, execute
orders, and grow as a market. NASDAQ thus believes that its fees are
fair and reasonable and consistent with the Exchange Act.

B. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement on Burden on Competition

    The Exchange does not believe that the proposed rule change will
impose any burden on competition not necessary or appropriate in
furtherance of the purposes of the Act.

C. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement on Comments on the Proposed
Rule Change Received From Members, Participants or Others

    No written comments were either solicited or received.

III. Date of Effectiveness of the Proposed Rule Change and Timing for
Commission Action

    The foregoing rule change has become effective pursuant to Section
19(b)(3)(A)(ii) of the Act \9\ and paragraph (f)(2) of Rule 19b-4 \10\
thereunder. At any time within 60 days of the filing of such proposed
rule change, the Commission summarily may temporarily suspend such rule
change if it appears to the Commission that such action is necessary or
appropriate in the public interest, for the protection of investors, or
otherwise in furtherance of the purposes of the Act.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \9\ 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(3)(A)(ii).
    \10\ 17 CFR 240.19b-4(f)(2).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

IV. Solicitation of Comments

    Interested persons are invited to submit written data, views and
arguments concerning the foregoing, including whether the proposed rule
change is consistent with the Act. Comments may be submitted by any of
the following methods:

Electronic Comments

     Use the Commission's Internet comment form (http://
www.sec.gov/rules/sro.shtml); or
     Send an e-mail to<EMAIL_ADDRESS>Please include
File Number SR-NASDAQ-2010-088 on the subject line.

Paper Comments

     Send paper comments in triplicate to Elizabeth M. Murphy,
Secretary, Securities and Exchange Commission, 100 F Street, NE.,
Washington, DC 20549-1090.

All submissions should refer to File Number SR-NASDAQ-2010-088. This
file number should be included on the subject line if e-mail is used.
To help the Commission process and review your comments more
efficiently, please use only one method. The Commission will post all
comments on the Commission's Internet Web site (http://www.sec.gov/
rules/sro/shtml). Copies of the submission, all subsequent amendments,
all written statements with respect to the proposed rule change that
are filed with the Commission, and all written communications relating
to the proposed rule change between the Commission and any person,
other than those that may be withheld from the public in accordance
with the provisions of 5 U.S.C. 552, will be available for Web site
viewing and printing in the Commission's Public Reference Room, 100 F
Street, NE., Washington, DC 20549, on official business days between
the hours of 10 a.m. and 3 p.m. Copies of such filing also will be
available for inspection and copying at the principal office of the
Exchange. All comments received will be posted without change; the
Commission does not edit personal identifying information from
submissions. You should submit only information that you wish to make
available publicly. All submissions should refer to File No. SR-NASDAQ-
2010-088 and should be submitted on or before August 27, 2010.

    For the Commission, by the Division of Trading and Markets,
pursuant to delegated authority.\11\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \11\ 17 CFR 200.30-3(a)(12).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

Florence E. Harmon,
Deputy Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2010-19370 Filed 8-5-10; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 8010-01-P


			  UNITED STATES OF AMERICA

		        DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION

			  OFFICE OF THE SECRETARY

			          WASHINGTON, D.C.

Issued by the Department of Transportation on May 13, 2004

NOTICE OF ACTION TAKEN -- DOCKET OST 1996-1566

________________________________________________________________________
________________________________________________________

This serves as notice to the public of the action described below, taken
by the Department official indicated (no additional confirming order
will be issued in this matter).

Applicant:  AERO EJECUTIVA NIETO, S.A.
                              Date Filed:  April 13, 2004

Relief requested:  Exemption from 49 USC section 41301 to permit the
applicant to continue to conduct passenger charter operations between
Mexico and the United States, and other passenger charters in accordance
with 14 CFR Part 212, using small equipment (see below).

If renewal, date and citation of last action:  April 18, 2003, in this
Docket.

Applicant representative:  Eugene E. Smith,<PHONE_NUMBER>
DOT analyst:  Allen Brown,<PHONE_NUMBER>

Responsive pleadings:  None.

	DISPOSITION

Action:  Approved
                                            Action date:  May 13, 2004

Effective dates of authority granted:  May 13, 2004, through May 13,
2005

Basis for approval:  United States-Mexico Air Transport Services
Agreement (Agreement).

Except to the extent exempted/waived, this authority is subject to the
terms, conditions, and limitations indicated:  Standard exemption
conditions.

Special conditions/Remarks:  In the conduct of these operations, the
carrier must adhere to all applicable provisions of the U.S.-Mexico
Agreement.  In the conduct of these operations, the carrier may only use
aircraft capable of carrying no more than 60 passengers and having a
maximum payload capacity of no more than 18,000 pounds (small
equipment).  The above grant includes authority to operate Third and
Fourth Freedom charters.  While we have subjected, consistent with the
provisions of the Agreement, Mexican carriers conducting charter
operations with large aircraft to prior approval or submission of notice
for their Third and Fourth Freedom charters, we determined that any such
requirement was not necessary on public interest grounds in this case of
this carrier, since the carrier will be conducting these operations
solely with small aircraft.  (Other charter operations to/from the
United States under this authority, however, are subject to prior
approval under 14 CFR Part 212.)  Further, we are continuing to allow
Mexican carriers conducting passenger charters using small equipment to
make stopovers in the United States in the conduct of such operations.

Action taken by:   Paul L. Gretch, Director

		      Office of International Aviation

________________________________________________________________________
________________________________________________________

Under authority assigned by the Department in its regulations, 14 CFR
Part 385, we found that (1) our action was consistent with Department
policy; (2) the applicant was qualified to perform its proposed
operations; (3) grant of the authority was consistent with the public
interest; and (4) grant of the authority would not constitute a major
regulatory action under the Energy Policy and Conservation Act of 1975.
To the extent not granted/deferred/dismissed, we denied all requests in
the referenced Docket.  We may amend, modify, or revoke the authority
granted in this Notice at any time without hearing at our discretion.

Persons entitled to petition the Department for review of the action set
forth in this Notice under the Department’s regulations, 14 CFR
§385.30, may file their petitions within seven (7) days after the date
of issuance of this Notice.  This action was effective when taken, and
the filing of a petition for review will not alter such effectiveness.

An electronic version of this document is available on
the圠牯摬圠摩敗瑡ഺ瑨灴⼺搯獭搮瑯朮癯⼯敲潰瑲
⽳敲潰瑲彳癡慩楴湯愮灳

B


[Federal Register Volume 88, Number 242 (Tuesday, December 19, 2023)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Page 87668]
[FR Doc No: 2023-27829]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION

Federal Aviation Administration

[Docket No. FAA-2022-1203]

14 CFR Chapter I

Policy Regarding Processing Land Use Changes on Federally
Acquired or Federally Conveyed Airport Land; Correction

AGENCY: Federal Aviation Administration (FAA), Department of
Transportation (DOT).

ACTION: Notification of final policy; correction.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Federal Aviation Administration published a document in
the Federal Register of December 8, 2023, concerning its Policy
Regarding Processing Land Use Changes on Federally Acquired or
Federally Conveyed Airport Land. The document contained an incorrect
FAA Docket Number.

DATES: This correction is effective January 8, 2024.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Michael Helvey, Airport Compliance and
Management Analysis, ACO-1, Federal Aviation Administration, 800
Independence Avenue SW, Washington, DC 20591, telephone<PHONE_NUMBER>;
facsimile:<PHONE_NUMBER>.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

Correction

    In the Federal Register of December 8, 2023, in FR Doc. 2023-27017,
on page 85474, in the second column, correct the ``Docket No.'' to
read:

[Docket No. FAA-2022-1203]

    Dated: December 12, 2023.
Michael Helvey,
Director, Office of Airport Compliance and Management Analysis.
[FR Doc. 2023-27829 Filed 12-18-23; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910-13-P