[Federal Register Volume 84, Number 242 (Tuesday, December 17, 2019)]
[Proposed Rules]
[Pages 68822-68824]
[FR Doc No: 2019-27061]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION

Federal Aviation Administration

14 CFR Part 39

[Docket No. FAA-2019-0984; Product Identifier 2019-NM-161-AD]
RIN 2120-AA64

Airworthiness Directives; The Boeing Company Airplanes

AGENCY: Federal Aviation Administration (FAA), DOT.

ACTION: Notice of proposed rulemaking (NPRM).

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The FAA proposes to supersede Airworthiness Directive (AD)
2018-16-05, which applies to all The Boeing Company Model 757-200, -
200PF, -200CB, and -300 series airplanes. AD 2018-16-05 requires
repetitive inspections for skin cracking and shim migration at the
upper link drag fittings, diagonal brace cracking, and fastener
looseness; and applicable on-condition actions. Since the FAA issued AD
2018-16-05, an operator reported finding multiple cracks in the drag
fitting at fastener holes while inspecting for cracking as required by
AD 2018-16-05. This proposed AD would retain the actions required by AD
2018-16-05, reduce the compliance times for certain inspections, and
add repetitive inspections at certain fastener hole locations and
applicable on-condition actions. The FAA is proposing this AD to
address the unsafe condition on these products.

DATES: The FAA must receive comments on this proposed AD by January 31,
2020.

ADDRESSES: You may send comments, using the procedures found in 14 CFR
11.43 and 11.45, by any of the following methods:
     Federal eRulemaking Portal: Go to https://www.regulations.gov. Follow the instructions for submitting comments.
     Fax:<PHONE_NUMBER>.
     Mail: U.S. Department of Transportation, Docket
Operations, M-30, West Building Ground Floor, Room W12-140, 1200 New
Jersey Avenue SE, Washington, DC 20590.
     Hand Delivery: Deliver to Mail address above between 9
a.m. and 5 p.m., Monday through Friday, except Federal holidays.
    For service information identified in this NPRM, contact Boeing
Commercial Airplanes, Attention: Contractual & Data Services (C&DS),
2600 Westminster Blvd., MC 110-SK57, Seal Beach, CA 90740-5600;
telephone<PHONE_NUMBER>; internet https://www.myboeingfleet.com. You may
view this service information at the FAA, Transport Standards Branch,
2200 South 216th St., Des Moines, WA. For information on the
availability of this material at the FAA, call<PHONE_NUMBER>. It is also
available on the internet at https://www.regulations.gov by searching
for and locating Docket No. FAA-2019-0984.

Examining the AD Docket

    You may examine the AD docket on the internet at https://www.regulations.gov by searching for and locating Docket No. FAA-2019-
0984; or in person at Docket Operations between 9 a.m. and 5 p.m.,
Monday through Friday, except Federal holidays. The AD docket contains
this NPRM, the regulatory evaluation, any comments received, and other
information. The street address for Docket Operations is listed above.
Comments will be available in the AD docket shortly after receipt.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Chandra Ramdoss, Aerospace Engineer,
Airframe Section, FAA, Los Angeles ACO Branch, 3960 Paramount
Boulevard, Lakewood, CA 90712-4137; phone:<PHONE_NUMBER>; fax: 562-627-
5210; email<EMAIL_ADDRESS>
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

Comments Invited

    The FAA invites you to send any written relevant data, views, or
arguments about this proposal. Send your comments to an address listed
under the ADDRESSES section. Include ``Docket No. FAA-2019-0984;
Product Identifier 2019-NM-161-AD'' at the beginning of your comments.
The FAA specifically invites comments on the overall regulatory,
economic, environmental, and energy aspects of this NPRM. The FAA will
consider all comments received by the closing date and may amend this
NPRM because of those comments.
    The FAA will post all comments, without change, to https://www.regulations.gov, including any personal information you provide.
The FAA will also post a report summarizing each substantive verbal
contact the agency receives about this proposed AD.

Discussion

    The FAA issued AD 2018-16-05, Amendment 39-19345 (83 FR 38250,
August 6, 2018) (``AD 2018-16-05''), for all The Boeing Company Model
757-200, -200PF, -200CB, and -300 series airplanes. AD 2018-16-05
requires repetitive inspections for skin cracking and shim migration at
the upper link drag fittings, diagonal brace cracking, and fastener
looseness; and applicable on-condition actions. AD 2018-16-05 resulted
from reports of bolt rotation in the engine drag fitting joint and
fastener heads; an inspection of the fastener holes revealed that
cracks were found in the skin on two airplanes. The FAA issued AD 2018-
16-05 to address cracking in the wing upper skin and forward drag
fittings, which could lead to a compromised upper link and reduced
structural integrity of the engine strut.

Actions Since AD 2018-16-05 Was Issued

    Since the FAA issued AD 2018-16-05, an operator reported finding
multiple cracks in the drag fitting at the fastener holes while
inspecting for cracking as required by AD 2018-16-05. Subsequent
analysis determined that additional repetitive open-hole high frequency
eddy current (HFEC) inspections for cracking are necessary at the
forward rows of fastener holes. Based on findings, it was also
determined that more frequent inspections for cracking in the diagonal
brace and diagonal brace fittings are necessary.

Related Service Information Under 1 CFR Part 51

    The FAA reviewed Boeing Alert Requirements Bulletin 757-57A0073 RB,
Revision 1, dated August 1, 2019. This service information describes
procedures for repetitive inspections,

including general visual, detailed, and HFEC inspections, for loose
fasteners, skin cracking, and shim migration at the upper link drag
fittings and for cracking in the diagonal brace and diagonal brace
fittings and applicable on-condition actions. This service information
is reasonably available because the interested parties have access to
it through their normal course of business or by the means identified
in the ADDRESSES section.

FAA's Determination

    The FAA is proposing this AD because the FAA evaluated all the
relevant information and determined the unsafe condition described
previously is likely to exist or develop in other products of the same
type design.

Proposed AD Requirements

    Although this proposed AD does not explicitly restate the
requirements of AD 2018-16-05, this proposed AD would retain all of the
requirements of AD 2018-16-05. Those requirements are referenced in the
service information identified previously, which, in turn, is
referenced in paragraph (g) of this proposed AD. This proposed AD would
also require accomplishment of the actions identified in the
Accomplishment Instructions of Boeing Alert Requirements Bulletin 757-
57A0073 RB, Revision 1, dated August 1, 2019, described previously.
    For information on the procedures and compliance times, see this
service information at https://www.regulations.gov by searching for and
locating Docket No. FAA-2019-0984.

Explanation of Requirements Bulletin

    The FAA worked in conjunction with industry, under the
Airworthiness Directive Implementation Aviation Rulemaking Committee
(AD ARC), to enhance the AD system. One enhancement is a process for
annotating which steps in the service information are ``required for
compliance'' (RC) with an AD. Boeing has implemented this RC concept
into Boeing service bulletins.
    In an effort to further improve the quality of ADs and AD-related
Boeing service information, a joint process improvement initiative was
worked between the FAA and Boeing. The initiative resulted in the
development of a new process in which the service information more
clearly identifies the actions needed to address the unsafe condition
in the ``Accomplishment Instructions.'' The new process results in a
Boeing Requirements Bulletin, which contains only the actions needed to
address the unsafe condition (i.e., only the RC actions).

Costs of Compliance

    The FAA estimates that this proposed AD affects 561 airplanes of
U.S. registry. The FAA estimates the following costs to comply with
this proposed AD:

                                      Estimated Costs for Required Actions
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
                                                                                Cost on U.S.
              Action                    Labor cost        Parts cost      Cost per product        operators
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Repetitive inspections (retained   83 work-hours x $85              $0  $7,055 per           $3,957,855 per
 actions from AD 2018-16-05).       per hour = $7,055                    inspection cycle.    inspection cycle.
                                    per inspection
                                    cycle.
Repetitive HFEC inspections (new   2 work-hours x $85                0  $170 per inspection  $95,370 per
 proposed action).                  per hour = $170                      cycle.               inspection cycle.
                                    per inspection
                                    cycle.
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

    The FAA has received no definitive data that would enable the FAA
to provide cost estimates for the on-condition actions specified in
this proposed AD.

Authority for This Rulemaking

    Title 49 of the United States Code specifies the FAA's authority to
issue rules on aviation safety. Subtitle I, Section 106, describes the
authority of the FAA Administrator. Subtitle VII, Aviation Programs,
describes in more detail the scope of the Agency's authority.
    The FAA is issuing this rulemaking under the authority described in
Subtitle VII, Part A, Subpart III, Section 44701, ``General
requirements.'' Under that section, Congress charges the FAA with
promoting safe flight of civil aircraft in air commerce by prescribing
regulations for practices, methods, and procedures the Administrator
finds necessary for safety in air commerce. This regulation is within
the scope of that authority because it addresses an unsafe condition
that is likely to exist or develop on products identified in this
rulemaking action.
    This proposed AD is issued in accordance with authority delegated
by the Executive Director, Aircraft Certification Service, as
authorized by FAA Order 8000.51C. In accordance with that order,
issuance of ADs is normally a function of the Compliance and
Airworthiness Division, but during this transition period, the
Executive Director has delegated the authority to issue ADs applicable
to transport category airplanes and associated appliances to the
Director of the System Oversight Division.

Regulatory Findings

    The FAA has determined that this proposed AD would not have
federalism implications under Executive Order 13132. This proposed AD
would not have a substantial direct effect on the States, on the
relationship between the national Government and the States, or on the
distribution of power and responsibilities among the various levels of
government.
    For the reasons discussed above, I certify that the proposed
regulation:
    (1) Is not a ``significant regulatory action'' under Executive
Order 12866,
    (2) Will not affect intrastate aviation in Alaska, and
    (3) Will not have a significant economic impact, positive or
negative, on a substantial number of small entities under the criteria
of the Regulatory Flexibility Act.

List of Subjects in 14 CFR Part 39

    Air transportation, Aircraft, Aviation safety, Incorporation by
reference, Safety.

The Proposed Amendment

    Accordingly, under the authority delegated to me by the
Administrator, the FAA proposes to amend 14 CFR part 39 as follows:

PART 39--AIRWORTHINESS DIRECTIVES

0
1. The authority citation for part 39 continues to read as follows:

    Authority:  49 U.S.C. 106(g), 40113, 44701.

Sec.  39.13  [Amended]

0
2. The FAA amends Sec.  39.13 by removing Airworthiness Directive (AD)
2018-16-05, Amendment 39-19345 (83 FR 38250, August 6, 2018), and
adding the following new AD:

The Boeing Company: Docket No. FAA-2019-0984; Product Identifier
2019-NM-161-AD.

(a) Comments Due Date

    The FAA must receive comments on this AD action by January 31,
2020.

(b) Affected ADs

    This AD replaces AD 2018-16-05, Amendment 39-19345 (83 FR 38250,
August 6, 2018) (``AD 2018-16-05'').

(c) Applicability

    This AD applies to all The Boeing Company Model 757-200, -200PF,
-200CB, and -300 series airplanes, certificated in any category.

(d) Subject

    Air Transport Association (ATA) of America Code 57, Wings.

(e) Unsafe Condition

    This AD was prompted by reports of bolt rotation in the engine
drag fitting joint and fastener heads; an inspection of the fastener
holes revealed that cracks were found in the skin. This AD was also
prompted by a report of multiple cracks found in the drag fitting at
fastener holes during inspections required by AD 2018-16-05. The FAA
is issuing this AD to address cracking in the wing upper skin and
forward drag fittings, which could lead to a compromised upper link
and reduced structural integrity of the engine strut.

(f) Compliance

    Comply with this AD within the compliance times specified,
unless already done.

(g) Required Actions

    Except as specified by paragraph (h) of this AD: At the
applicable times specified in the ``Compliance'' paragraph of Boeing
Alert Requirements Bulletin 757-57A0073 RB, Revision 1, dated August
1, 2019, do all applicable actions identified in, and in accordance
with, the Accomplishment Instructions of Boeing Alert Requirements
Bulletin 757-57A0073 RB, Revision 1, dated August 1, 2019.
    Note 1 to paragraph (g): Guidance for accomplishing the actions
required by this AD can be found in Boeing Alert Service Bulletin
757-57A0073, Revision 1, dated August 1, 2019, which is referred to
in Boeing Alert Requirements Bulletin 757-57A0073 RB, Revision 1,
dated August 1, 2019.

(h) Exceptions to Service Information Specifications

    (1) Where Boeing Alert Requirements Bulletin 757-57A0073 RB,
Revision 1, dated August 1, 2019, uses the phrase ``the Revision 1
date of Requirements Bulletin 757-57A0073 RB'' this AD requires
using ``the effective date of this AD.''
    (2) Where Boeing Alert Requirements Bulletin 757-57A0073 RB,
Revision 1, dated August 1, 2019, specifies contacting Boeing for
repair instructions: This AD requires doing the repair and
applicable on-condition actions before further flight using a method
approved in accordance with the procedures specified in paragraph
(i) of this AD.

(i) Alternative Methods of Compliance (AMOCs)

    (1) The Manager, Los Angeles ACO Branch, FAA, has the authority
to approve AMOCs for this AD, if requested using the procedures
found in 14 CFR 39.19. In accordance with 14 CFR 39.19, send your
request to your principal inspector or local Flight Standards
District Office, as appropriate. If sending information directly to
the manager of the certification office, send it to the attention of
the person identified in paragraph (j)(1) of this AD. Information
may be emailed to<EMAIL_ADDRESS>    (2) Before using any approved AMOC, notify your appropriate
principal inspector, or lacking a principal inspector, the manager
of the local flight standards district office/certificate holding
district office.
    (3) An AMOC that provides an acceptable level of safety may be
used for any repair, modification, or alteration required by this AD
if it is approved by The Boeing Company Organization Designation
Authorization (ODA) that has been authorized by the Manager, Los
Angeles ACO Branch, FAA, to make those findings. To be approved, the
repair method, modification deviation, or alteration deviation must
meet the certification basis of the airplane, and the approval must
specifically refer to this AD.
    (4) AMOCs approved previously for AD 2018-16-05 are not approved
as AMOCs for this AD.

(j) Related Information

    (1) For more information about this AD, contact Chandra Ramdoss,
Aerospace Engineer, Airframe Section, FAA, Los Angeles ACO Branch,
3960 Paramount Boulevard, Lakewood, CA 90712-4137; phone: 562-627-
5239; fax:<PHONE_NUMBER>; email<EMAIL_ADDRESS>    (2) For service information identified in this AD, contact
Boeing Commercial Airplanes, Attention: Contractual & Data Services
(C&DS), 2600 Westminster Blvd., MC 110-SK57, Seal Beach, CA 90740-
5600; telephone<PHONE_NUMBER>; internet https://www.myboeingfleet.com. You may view this referenced service
information at the FAA, Transport Standards Branch, 2200 South 216th
St., Des Moines, WA. For information on the availability of this
material at the FAA, call<PHONE_NUMBER>.

    Issued in Des Moines, Washington, on December 5, 2019.
Michael Kaszycki,
Acting Director, System Oversight Division, Aircraft Certification
Service.
[FR Doc. 2019-27061 Filed 12-16-19; 8:45 am]
 BILLING CODE 4910-13-P


[Federal Register Volume 88, Number 17 (Thursday, January 26, 2023)]
[Notices]
[Pages 5046-5048]
[FR Doc No: 2023-01516]

=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

[Release No. 34-96723; File No. SR-BOX-2023-03]

Self-Regulatory Organizations; BOX Exchange LLC; Notice of Filing
and Immediate Effectiveness of a Proposed Rule Change To Establish a
New Service and Related Fees for Use of the BOX Options Market LLC
(``BOX'') Trade Management System

January 20, 2023.
    Pursuant to section 19(b)(1) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934
(``Act''),\1\ and Rule 19b-4 thereunder,\2\ notice is hereby given that
on January 6, 2023, BOX Exchange LLC (the ``Exchange'') filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission (``Commission'') the proposed rule
change as described in Items I and II below, which Items have been
prepared by the self-regulatory organization. The Exchange filed the
proposed rule change pursuant to section 19(b)(3)(A) of the Act,\3\ and
Rule 19b-4(f)(6) thereunder,\4\ which renders [the proposal effective
upon filing with the Commission. The Commission is publishing this
notice to solicit comments on the proposed rule change from interested
persons.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \1\ 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(1).
    \2\ 17 CFR 240.19b-4.
    \3\ 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(3)(A)(ii).
    \4\ F17 CFR 240.19b-4(f)(2).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

I. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement of the Terms of Substance
of the Proposed Rule Change

    The Exchange proposes to establish a new service and related fees
for use of the BOX Options Market LLC (``BOX'') Trade Management
System. The text of the proposed rule change is available from the
principal office of the Exchange, at the Commission's Public Reference
Room and also on the Exchange's internet website at https://rules.boxexchange.com/rulefilings.

II. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement of the Purpose of, and
Statutory Basis for, the Proposed Rule Change

    In its filing with the Commission, the self-regulatory organization
included statements concerning the purpose of, and basis for, the
proposed rule change and discussed any comments it received on the
proposed rule change. The text of these statements may be examined at
the places specified in Item IV below. The self-regulatory organization
has prepared summaries, set forth in Sections A, B, and C below, of the
most significant aspects of such statements.

A. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement of the Purpose of, and
Statutory Basis for, the Proposed Rule Change

1. Purpose
    The purpose of the proposed rule change is to establish a new
service and related fees for the use of BOX's Trade Management System
(``TMS'').
    TMS is a system licensed by BOX that allows users to query trades,
correct trades, and/or allocate trades to the appropriate accounts and
sub-accounts for clearing (collectively known as ``trade
information''). After a trade is executed, a Participant may need to
update or correct the trade information before the trade is submitted
to the Options Clearing Corporation (``OCC'') for clearing. Currently,
TMS is accessed only by the BOX Market Operations Center (``MOC''). If
a Participant wishes to make any corrections or updates to trade
information, they must contact the MOC or produce a detailed file for
automated processing by BOX.
    Participants have requested that BOX allow them to access TMS
directly so that they may correct their trade information themselves
without interacting with the MOC or submitting a detailed file. The
Exchange believes that providing direct access to TMS to Participants
will allow them to more efficiently manage their back office clearing
operations and assist them in providing accurate clearing information
to the OCC. As such, the Exchange now proposes to make TMS available to
BOX Participants, which will allow Participants the ability to correct
certain OCC-required trade information. Specifically, TMS will allow
Participants to correct a trade's account number, sub-account number,
Clearing Member Trade Assignment (``CMTA'') clearing firm, Clearing
Participant Give-Up, quantity, account type, and other information
connected to trades.
    The Exchange also proposes to establish a subscription fee of $350
per month, per user for the use of TMS.\5\ The Exchange notes that use
of TMS is completely voluntary and the subscription fee will be charged
to all Participants equally based on the number of users requested. The
Exchange also notes that Participants who do not wish to use TMS will
still be able to make any corrections or updates to trade information
by contacting the MOC or producing a detailed file for automated
processing by BOX.\6\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \5\ For example, Firm A is a BOX Participant who wishes to
access TMS for two separate users. Under this proposal, Firm A would
be assessed a fee of $700 per month for their use of TMS (two users
at $350 equals $700).
    \6\ The Exchange notes that other exchanges charge for
performing certain post-trade adjustments on behalf of permit
holders. See NYSE Arca Options Fees and Charges, Service Fees and
NYSE American Options Fee Schedule, Section VIII (charging $5.00 per
trade adjusted for Post-Trade Adjustments that do not affect the
contractual terms of a trade, the Service Fee would only apply when
the Exchange performs Post-Trade Adjustments on behalf of ATP or OTP
Holders when such Post-Trade Adjustments could otherwise have been
self-executed. ATP or OTP Holders may continue to make these Post-
Trade Adjustments on their own without incurring the Service Fee).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    The Exchange notes that other options exchanges make similar tools
available to firms where the firm, not Exchange personnel, may correct
trade information that is submitted to the OCC.\7\ The Exchange further
notes that another exchange charges its participants a monthly fee per
user for a similar product.\8\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \7\ See e.g., the Nasdaq Options Maintenance Tool, the Cboe
Options Clearing Editor, the MIAX Member Firm Portal, and the NYSE
Pillar Trade Ops Portal.
    \8\ The Nasdaq Stock Market LLC (``Nasdaq'') charges $200 per
month, per user. See Nasdaq Rules Options 7 Pricing Schedule,
Section 6 Nasdaq Options Maintenance Tool.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

2. Statutory Basis
    The Exchange believes that the proposal is consistent with the
requirements of section 6(b) of the Act,\9\ in general, and sections
6(b)(4) and section 6(b)(5) of the Act,\10\ in particular, because it
is designed to prevent fraudulent and manipulative acts and practices,
to promote just and equitable principles of trade, to foster
cooperation and coordination with persons engaged in facilitating
transactions in securities, and to remove impediments to and perfect
the mechanism of a free and open market and a national market system.
The Exchange notes that offering the use of TMS to BOX Participants is
consistent with the Act in that the use of TMS is completely voluntary
and the subscription fees will be imposed on all

Participants equally based on the number of users requested. Further,
the Exchange believes that the proposed fee discussed herein is
equitable and not unfairly discriminatory because the use of TMS is
voluntary and subscription fees will be charged to all Participants
equally based on the number of users provisioned to use TMS. As noted
above, Participants use of TMS is an optional alternative to the
current processes of (1) requesting transactions to be updated by the
MOC or (2) producing a detailed file for automated processing by BOX.
The Exchange believes that providing TMS to Participants will allow
Participants to more efficiently manage their back office clearing
operations and assist them in providing accurate clearing information
to the OCC. The Exchange notes that trade information in TMS is
specific to each Participant and their trades, allowing them to
conveniently verify, update, and/or correct transaction information as
needed.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \9\ 15 U.S.C. 78f(b).
    \10\ 15 U.S.C. 78f(b)(4) and (5).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    Further, the Exchange believes that the proposed fee is reasonable
and appropriate as it will cover the costs associated with establishing
the use of TMS for Participants that request it and administering the
service to those Participants. Further, the Exchange notes that the
proposed fee is nominal and is not designed to provide a revenue stream
to BOX but rather to offset the costs associated with allowing
Participants to access and use TMS. Specifically, the Exchange notes
that the proposed fee is intended to cover the costs of establishing
the service, and monitoring and supporting the access and use of TMS by
Participants, among other things. As such, the Exchange believes the
proposed fee is reasonable and appropriate.
    As noted herein, Participants have requested this functionality and
each Participant may choose whether the value added is worth the cost
of the subscription. The Exchange believes offering TMS to BOX
Participants is consistent with the Act because TMS provides
Participants with the ability to directly update their transactions, at
their convenience, and immediately verify the results of their
modifications. Using TMS is purely a matter of convenience and is
wholly voluntary by the Participant. The Exchange again notes that
another exchange charges a monthly fee per user for a similar tool.\11\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \11\ See supra, note 8.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

B. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement on Burden on Competition

    The proposed rule change would allow the Exchange to establish a
new service and related fees for the use of BOX's TMS on a voluntary
basis. The Exchange notes that the subscription fee will be charged to
all Participants equally based on the number of users requested. Any
Participants who do not wish to use TMS will still be able to make any
corrections or updates to trade information by contacting the MOC or
producing a detailed file for automated processing by BOX. Further, the
Exchange notes that another exchange offers a similar service and
charges a monthly fee per user for a similar tool.\12\ As such, the
Exchange does not believe that the proposed rule change will impose any
burden on intermarket or intramarket competition not necessary or
appropriate in furtherance of the purposes of the Act.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \12\ See supra, note 8.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

C. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement on Comments on the Proposed
Rule Change Received From Members, Participants, or Others

    The Exchange has neither solicited nor received comments on the
proposed rule change.

III. Date of Effectiveness of the Proposed Rule Change and Timing for
Commission Action

    Because the foregoing proposed rule change does not: (i)
significantly affect the protection of investors or the public
interest; (ii) impose any significant burden on competition; and (iii)
become operative for 30 days from the date on which it was filed, or
such shorter time as the Commission may designate, it has become
effective pursuant to section 19(b)(3)(A) of the Act \13\ and Rule 19b-
4(f)(6) thereunder.\14\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \13\ 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(3)(A).
    \14\ 17 CFR 240.19b-4(f)(6). In addition, Rule 19b-4(f)(6)(iii)
requires a self-regulatory organization to give the Commission
written notice of its intent to file the proposed rule change, along
with a brief description and text of the proposed rule change, at
least five business days prior to the date of filing of the proposed
rule change, or such shorter time as designated by the Commission.
The Exchange has satisfied this requirement.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    A proposed rule change filed pursuant to Rule 19b-4(f)(6) under the
Act \15\ normally does not become operative for 30 days after the date
of its filing. However, Rule 19b-4(f)(6)(iii) \16\ permits the
Commission to designate a shorter time if such action is consistent
with the protection of investors and the public interest. The Exchange
has requested that the Commission waive the 30-day operative delay.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \15\ 17 CFR 240.19b-4(f)(6).
    \16\ 17 CFR 240.19b-4(f)(6)(iii).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    The Commission believes that waiving the 30-day operative delay is
consistent with the protection of investors and the public interest.
According to the Exchange, providing immediate access to BOX's TMS will
offer BOX Participants the option to more efficiently manage their back
office clearing operations and will assist them in providing accurate
clearing information to the OCC. Moreover, other exchanges offer
similar services to their members. Accordingly, the proposal does not
raise novel issues. For these reasons, the Commission designates that
the proposed rule change to be operative immediately upon filing.\17\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \17\ For purposes only of waiving the 30-day operative delay,
the Commission has considered the proposed rule's impact on
efficiency, competition, and capital formation. 15 U.S.C. 78c(f).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    At any time within 60 days of the filing of the proposed rule
change, the Commission summarily may temporarily suspend such rule
change if it appears to the Commission that such action is necessary or
appropriate in the public interest, for the protection of investors, or
otherwise in furtherance of the purposes of the Act. If the Commission
takes such action, the Commission shall institute proceedings to
determine whether the proposed rule change should be approved or
disapproved.

IV. Solicitation of Comments

    Interested persons are invited to submit written data, views and
arguments concerning the foregoing, including whether the proposed rule
change is consistent with the Act. Comments may be submitted by any of
the following methods:

Electronic Comments

     Use the Commission's internet comment form (http://www.sec.gov/rules/sro.shtml); or
     Send an email to [email protected]. Please include
File Number SR-BOX-2023-03 on the subject line.

Paper Comments

     Send paper comments in triplicate to Secretary, Securities
and Exchange Commission, 100 F Street NE, Washington, DC 20549-1090.

All submissions should refer to File Number SR-BOX-2023-03. This file
number should be included on the subject line if email is used. To help
the Commission process and review your comments more efficiently,
please use only one method. The Commission will post all comments on
the Commission's internet website (http://www.sec.gov/rules/sro.shtml).
Copies of the submission, all subsequent amendments, all written
statements with respect to the proposed rule

change that are filed with the Commission, and all written
communications relating to the proposed rule change between the
Commission and any person, other than those that may be withheld from
the public in accordance with the provisions of 5 U.S.C. 552, will be
available for website viewing and printing in the Commission's Public
Reference Room, 100 F Street NE, Washington, DC 20549, on official
business days between the hours of 10:00 a.m. and 3:00 p.m. Copies of
the filing also will be available for inspection and copying at the
principal office of the Exchange. All comments received will be posted
without change. Persons submitting comments are cautioned that we do
not redact or edit personal identifying information from comment
submissions. You should submit only information that you wish to make
available publicly. All submissions should refer to File Number SR-BOX-
2023-03 and should be submitted on or before February 16, 2023.

    For the Commission, by the Division of Trading and Markets,
pursuant to delegated authority.\18\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \18\ 17 CFR 200.30-3(a)(12).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

Sherry R. Haywood,
Assistant Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2023-01516 Filed 1-25-23; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 8011-01-P


[Federal Register Volume 79, Number 62 (Tuesday, April 1, 2014)]
[Notices]
[Pages 18318-18319]
[FR Doc No: 2014-07231]

=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF LABOR

Occupational Safety and Health Administration

[Docket No. OSHA-2010-0030]

Ionizing Radiation Standard; Extension of the Office of
Management and Budget's (OMB) Approval of Information Collection
(Paperwork) Requirements

AGENCY: Occupational Safety and Health Administration (OSHA), Labor.

ACTION: Request for public comments.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: OSHA solicits public comments concerning its proposal to
extend OMB approval of the information collection requirements
specified in the Ionizing Radiation Standard (29 CFR 1910.1096). The
information collection requirements contained in the Ionizing Radiation
Standard protect workers from the adverse health effects that may
result from occupational exposure to ionizing radiation, including
tissue damage and cancer.

DATES: Comments must be submitted (postmarked, sent, or received) by
June 2, 2014.

ADDRESSES:
    Electronically: You may submit comments and attachments
electronically at http://www.regulations.gov, which is the Federal
eRulemaking Portal. Follow the instructions online for submitting
comments.
    Facsimile: If your comments, including attachments, are not longer
than 10 pages you may fax them to the OSHA Docket Office at (202) 693-
1648.
    Mail, hand delivery, express mail, messenger, or courier service:
When using this method, you must submit a copy of your comments and
attachments to the OSHA Docket Office, OSHA Docket No. OSHA-2010-0030,
U.S. Department of Labor, Occupational Safety and Health
Administration, Room N-2625, 200 Constitution Avenue NW., Washington,
DC 20210. Deliveries (hand, express mail, messenger, and courier
service) are accepted during the Department of Labor's and Docket
Office's normal business hours, 8:15 a.m. to 4:45 p.m., e.t.
    Instructions: All submissions must include the Agency name and the
OSHA docket number for the Information Collection Request (ICR) (OSHA-
2010-0030). All comments, including any personal information you
provide, are placed in the public docket without change, and may be
made available online at http://www.regulations.gov. For further
information on submitting comments see the ``Public Participation''
heading in the section of this notice titled SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION.
    Docket: To read or download comments or other material in the
docket, go to http://www.regulations.gov or the OSHA Docket Office at
the address above. All documents in the docket (including this Federal
Register notice) are listed in the http://www.regulations.gov index;
however, some information (e.g., copyrighted material) is not publicly
available to read or download from the Web site. All submissions,
including copyrighted material, are available for inspection and
copying at the OSHA Docket Office. You also may contact Theda Kenney at
the address below to obtain a copy of the ICR.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Theda Kenney or Todd Owen, Directorate
of Standards and Guidance, OSHA, U.S. Department of Labor, Room N-3609,
200 Constitution Avenue NW., Washington, DC 20210; telephone (202) 693-
2222.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

I. Background

    The Department of Labor, as part of its continuing effort to reduce
paperwork and respondent (i.e., employer) burden, conducts a
preclearance consultation program to provide the public with an
opportunity to comment on proposed and continuing information
collection requirements in accord with the Paperwork Reduction Act of
1995 (44 U.S.C. 3506(c)(2)(A)). This program ensures that information
is in the desired format, reporting burden (time and costs) is minimal,
collection instruments are clearly understood, and OSHA's estimate of
the information collection burden is accurate. The Occupational Safety
and Health Act of 1970 (the OSH Act) (29 U.S.C. 651 et seq.) authorizes
information collection by employers as necessary or appropriate for
enforcement of the OSH Act or for developing information regarding the
causes and prevention of occupational injuries, illnesses, and
accidents (29 U.S.C. 657). The OSH Act also requires that OSHA obtain
such information with minimum burden upon employers, especially those
operating small businesses, and to reduce to the maximum extent
feasible unnecessary duplication of efforts in obtaining information
(29 U.S.C. 657).
    The basic purpose of the information collection requirements in the
Standard on Ionizing Radiation is to document

that employers are providing their workers with protection from
hazardous ionizing radiation exposure.
    Several provisions of the Standard specify paperwork requirements,
including: monitoring worker exposure to ionizing radiation,
instructing workers on the hazards associated with ionizing radiation
exposure and precautions to minimize exposure, posting of caution signs
at radiation areas, reporting worker overexposures to OSHA, maintaining
exposure records, and providing exposure records to current and former
workers.

II. Special Issues for Comment

    OSHA has a particular interest in comments on the following issues:
     Whether the proposed information collection requirements
are necessary for the proper performance of the Agency's functions to
protect workers, including whether the information is useful;
     The accuracy of OSHA's estimate of the burden (time and
costs) of the information collection requirements, including the
validity of the methodology and assumptions used;
     The quality, utility, and clarity of the information
collected; and
     Ways to minimize the burden on employers who must comply;
for example, by using automated or other technological information
collection and transmission techniques.

III. Proposed Actions

    OSHA is requesting that OMB extend its approval of the information
collection requirements specified in the Ionizing Radiation Standard.
OSHA is also requesting that it retain its current burden hour estimate
of 45,217 hours. There is no adjustment in the estimated total of
$5,691,144 for the cost for whole body monitoring and extremity
monitoring badges. The Agency will summarize the comments submitted in
response to this notice, and will include this summary in the request
to OMB.
    Type of Review: Extension of a currently approved collection.
    Title: Ionizing Radiation Standard (29 CFR 1910.1096).
    OMB Control Number: 1218-0103.
    Affected Public: Business or other for-profits.
    Number of Respondents: 12,719.
    Frequency of Responses: On Occasion; Quarterly; Annually;
Immediately; Within 24 hours; Within 30 days.
    Total Responses: 256,914.
    Average Time per Response: Varies from 5 minutes (.08 hour) to
maintain radiation exposure records to 20 minutes (.5 hours) for
employers to gather and prepare training materials, and maintaining,
compiling, and sending records to the worker.
    Estimated Total Burden Hours: 45,217.
    Estimated Cost (Operation and Maintenance): $5,691,144

IV. Public Participation--Submission of Comments on This Notice and
Internet Access to Comments and Submissions

    You may submit comments in response to this document as follows:
(1) Electronically at http://www.regulations.gov, which is the Federal
eRulemaking Portal; (2) by facsimile (fax); or (3) by hard copy. All
comments, attachments, and other material must identify the Agency name
and the OSHA docket number for this ICR (Docket No. OSHA-2010-0030).
You may supplement electronic submissions by uploading document files
electronically. If you wish to mail additional materials in reference
to an electronic or a facsimile submission, you must submit them to the
OSHA Docket Office (see the section of this notice titled ADDRESSES).
The additional materials must clearly identify your electronic comments
by your name, date, and docket number so the Agency can attach them to
your comments.
    Because of security procedures, the use of regular mail may cause a
significant delay in the receipt of comments. For information about
security procedures concerning the delivery of materials by hand,
express delivery, messenger or courier service, please contact the OSHA
Docket Office at<PHONE_NUMBER>, (TTY<PHONE_NUMBER>).
    Comments and submissions are posted without change at http://www.regulations.gov. Therefore, OSHA cautions commenters about
submitting personal information such as social security numbers and
date of birth. Although all submissions are listed in the http://www.regulations.gov index, some information (e.g., copyrighted
material) is not publicly available to read or download from this Web
site. All submissions, including copyrighted material, are available
for inspection and copying at the OSHA Docket Office. Information on
using the http://www.regulations.gov Web site to submit comments and
access the docket is available at the Web site's ``User Tips'' link.
Contact the OSHA Docket Office for information about materials not
available through the Web site, and for assistance in using the
Internet to locate docket submissions.

V. Authority and Signature

    David Michaels, Ph.D., MPH, Assistant Secretary of Labor for
Occupational Safety and Health, directed the preparation of this
notice. The authority for this notice is the Paperwork Reduction Act of
1995 (44 U.S.C. 3506 et seq.) and Secretary of Labor's Order No. 1-2012
(77 FR 3912).

    Signed at Washington, DC, on March 27, 2014.
David Michaels,
Assistant Secretary of Labor for Occupational Safety and Health.
[FR Doc. 2014-07231 Filed 3-31-14; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4510-26-P


[Federal Register Volume 86, Number 240 (Friday, December 17, 2021)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Pages 71555-71557]
[FR Doc No: 2021-27319]

========================================================================
Rules and Regulations
                                                Federal Register
________________________________________________________________________

This section of the FEDERAL REGISTER contains regulatory documents
having general applicability and legal effect, most of which are keyed
to and codified in the Code of Federal Regulations, which is published
under 50 titles pursuant to 44 U.S.C. 1510.

The Code of Federal Regulations is sold by the Superintendent of Documents.

========================================================================

Federal Register / Vol. 86, No. 240 / Friday, December 17, 2021 /
Rules and Regulations

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION

Federal Aviation Administration

14 CFR Part 39

[Docket No. FAA-2021-0269; Project Identifier MCAI-2020-01417-T;
Amendment 39-21682; AD 2021-16-19]
RIN 2120-AA64

Airworthiness Directives; Airbus Canada Limited Partnership (Type
Certificate Previously Held by C Series Aircraft Limited Partnership
(CSALP); Bombardier, Inc.) Airplanes

AGENCY: Federal Aviation Administration (FAA), DOT.

ACTION: Final rule.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The FAA is adopting a new airworthiness directive (AD) for
certain Airbus Canada Limited Partnership Model BD-500-1A10 and BD-500-
1A11 airplanes. This AD was prompted by reports of in-flight engine
shutdowns (IFESs); investigation results indicated that this could be
caused by high altitude climbs at higher thrust settings on engines
with certain thrust ratings. This AD requires amending the existing
airplane flight manual (AFM) to incorporate a new limitation and revise
certain normal procedures, as specified in a Transport Canada Civil
Aviation (TCCA) AD, which is incorporated by reference. The FAA is
issuing this AD to address the unsafe condition on these products.

DATES: This AD is effective January 21, 2022.
    The Director of the Federal Register approved the incorporation by
reference of certain publications listed in this AD as of January 21,
2022.

ADDRESSES: For TCCA material incorporated by reference (IBR) in this
AD, contact the TCCA, Transport Canada National Aircraft Certification,
159 Cleopatra Drive, Nepean, Ontario, K1A 0N5, CANADA; telephone 888-
663-3639; email [email protected]; internet https://tc.canada.ca/en/aviation. For Airbus material incorporated by reference in this AD,
contact Airbus Canada Limited Partnership, 13100 Henri-Fabre Boulevard,
Mirabel, Qu[eacute]bec J7N 3C6, Canada; telephone<PHONE_NUMBER>; email
[email protected]; internet https://a220world.airbus.com. You may
view this IBR material at the FAA, Airworthiness Products Section,
Operational Safety Branch, 2200 South 216th St., Des Moines, WA. For
information on the availability of this material at the FAA, call 206-
231-3195. It is also available in the AD docket on the internet at
https://www.regulations.gov by searching for and locating Docket No.
FAA-2021-0269.

Examining the AD Docket

    You may examine the AD docket on the internet at https://www.regulations.gov by searching for and locating Docket No. FAA-2021-
0269; or in person at Docket Operations between 9 a.m. and 5 p.m.,
Monday through Friday, except Federal holidays. The AD docket contains
this final rule, any comments received, and other information. The
address for Docket Operations is U.S. Department of Transportation,
Docket Operations, M-30, West Building Ground Floor, Room W12-140, 1200
New Jersey Avenue SE, Washington, DC 20590.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Thomas Niczky, Aerospace Engineer,
Avionics and Electrical Systems Section, FAA, New York ACO Branch, 1600
Stewart Avenue, Suite 410, Westbury, NY 11590; telephone<PHONE_NUMBER>;
fax<PHONE_NUMBER>; email [email protected].

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

Background

    TCCA, which is the aviation authority for Canada, has issued TCCA
AD CF-2020-41, issued October 15, 2020 (TCCA AD CF-2020-41) (also
referred to as the Mandatory Continuing Airworthiness Information, or
the MCAI), to correct an unsafe condition for certain Airbus Canada
Limited Partnership Model BD-500-1A10 and BD-500-1A11 airplanes.
    The FAA issued a notice of proposed rulemaking (NPRM) to amend 14
CFR part 39 by adding an AD that would apply to certain Airbus Canada
Limited Partnership Model BD-500-1A10 and BD-500-1A11 airplanes. The
NPRM published in the Federal Register on April 16, 2021 (86 FR 20097).
The NPRM was prompted by reports of IFESs; investigations are ongoing
to determine the root cause. Investigation results indicated that an
IFES could be caused by high altitude climbs at higher thrust settings
on engines with certain thrust ratings. The NPRM proposed to require
amending the existing AFM to incorporate a new limitation and revise
certain normal procedures, as specified in TCCA AD CF-2020-41.
    The FAA is issuing this AD to provide the flightcrew with
information and procedures for operation above 29,000 feet to prevent
uncontained failure of an engine during an IFES, which could result in
structural damage and reduced structural integrity of the airplane. See
the MCAI for additional background information.

Comments

    The FAA received comments from Air Line Pilots Association,
International (ALPA), who supported the NPRM without change.
    The FAA received additional comments from one commenter. The
following presents the comment received on the NPRM and the FAA's
response.

Request To Amend the Existing Airplane Flight Manual

    Delta Air Lines Inc. (Delta) asked that the proposed AD also
require amending the AFM with Supplement 21 at Issue 016 for Model
A220-300 (BD-500-1A11) airplanes. Delta stated that the proposed AD
requires amending the AFM with Supplement 21 for only Model A220-100
(BD-500-1A10) airplanes, and should include amending the AFM for both
models.
    The FAA agrees with the commenter's request. Paragraph (h)(2) of
the proposed AD incorrectly identified only the A220-100 AFM. The FAA
intended to require the AFM revision based on the applicable AFM for
both Model BD-500-1A10 and BD-500-1A11 airplanes, including both the
A220-100 and A220-300 AFMs. The FAA has added the AFM amendment for
Model A220-300 (Model BD-500-1A11) airplanes to paragraph (h)(2) of
this AD.

Conclusion

    The FAA reviewed the relevant data, considered the comments
received, and determined that air safety and the public interest
require adopting this final rule with the change described previously
and minor editorial changes. The FAA has determined that these minor
changes:
     Are consistent with the intent that was proposed in the
NPRM for addressing the unsafe condition; and
     Do not add any additional burden upon the public than was
already proposed in the NPRM.
    The FAA also determined that these changes will not increase the
economic burden on any operator or increase the scope of this final
rule.

Related Service Information Under 1 CFR Part 51

    TCCA AD CF-2020-41 specifies procedures for amending the applicable
AFM to incorporate a new limitation and revise the normal procedures to
limit the engine N1 setting for flights above 29,000 feet.
    Airbus Canada Limited Partnership has issued Supplement 21--
Operation Above 29000 Feet, of Airbus A220-100 Airplane Flight Manual,
Publication BD500-3AB48-22200-00, and Airbus A220-300 Airplane Flight
Manual Publication BD500-3AB48-32200-00, both Issue 016, dated October
16, 2020. These supplements specify limitations, information, and
procedures for operation above 29,000 feet. These documents are
distinct since they apply to different airplane models.
    This material is reasonably available because the interested
parties have access to it through their normal course of business or by
the means identified in the ADDRESSES section.

Interim Action

    The FAA considers this AD interim action. If final action is later
identified, the FAA might consider further rulemaking then.

Costs of Compliance

    The FAA estimates that this AD affects 42 airplanes of U.S.
registry. The FAA estimates the following costs to comply with this AD:

                                      Estimated Costs for Required Actions
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
                                                                                Cost per       Cost on U.S.
                          Labor cost                              Parts cost        product         operators
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
1 work-hour x $85 per hour = $85.............................              $0              $85           $3,570
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Authority for This Rulemaking

    Title 49 of the United States Code specifies the FAA's authority to
issue rules on aviation safety. Subtitle I, section 106, describes the
authority of the FAA Administrator. Subtitle VII: Aviation Programs,
describes in more detail the scope of the Agency's authority.
    The FAA is issuing this rulemaking under the authority described in
Subtitle VII, Part A, Subpart III, Section 44701: General requirements.
Under that section, Congress charges the FAA with promoting safe flight
of civil aircraft in air commerce by prescribing regulations for
practices, methods, and procedures the Administrator finds necessary
for safety in air commerce. This regulation is within the scope of that
authority because it addresses an unsafe condition that is likely to
exist or develop on products identified in this rulemaking action.

Regulatory Findings

    This AD will not have federalism implications under Executive Order
13132. This AD will not have a substantial direct effect on the States,
on the relationship between the national government and the States, or
on the distribution of power and responsibilities among the various
levels of government.
    For the reasons discussed above, I certify that this AD:
    (1) Is not a ``significant regulatory action'' under Executive
Order 12866,
    (2) Will not affect intrastate aviation in Alaska, and
    (3) Will not have a significant economic impact, positive or
negative, on a substantial number of small entities under the criteria
of the Regulatory Flexibility Act.

List of Subjects in 14 CFR Part 39

    Air transportation, Aircraft, Aviation safety, Incorporation by
reference, Safety.

Adoption of the Amendment

    Accordingly, under the authority delegated to me by the
Administrator, the FAA amends 14 CFR part 39 as follows:

PART 39--AIRWORTHINESS DIRECTIVES

0
1. The authority citation for part 39 continues to read as follows:

    Authority:  49 U.S.C. 106(g), 40113, 44701.

Sec.  39.13   [Amended]

0
2. The FAA amends Sec.  39.13 by adding the following new airworthiness
directive:

2021-16-19 Airbus Canada Limited Partnership (Type Certificate
Previously Held by C Series Aircraft Limited Partnership (CSALP);
Bombardier, Inc.): Amendment 39-21682; Docket No. FAA-2021-0269;
Project Identifier MCAI-2020-01417-T.

(a) Effective Date

    This airworthiness directive (AD) is effective January 21, 2022.

(b) Affected ADs

    None.

(c) Applicability

    This AD applies to Airbus Canada Limited Partnership (type
certificate previously held by C Series Aircraft Limited Partnership
(CSALP); Bombardier, Inc.) Model BD-500-1A10 and BD-500-1A11
airplanes, certificated in any category, as identified in Transport
Canada Civil Aviation (TCCA) AD CF-2020-41, issued October 15, 2020
(TCCA AD CF-2020-41).

(d) Subject

    Air Transport Association (ATA) of America Code 72, Engines.

(e) Reason

    This AD was prompted by reports of in-flight engine shutdowns
(IFESs); investigation results indicated that this could be caused
by high altitude climbs at higher thrust settings on engines with
certain thrust ratings. The FAA is issuing this AD to provide the
flightcrew with information and procedures for operation above
29,000 feet to prevent uncontained failure of an engine during an
IFES, which could result in structural damage and reduced structural
integrity of the airplane.

(f) Compliance

    Comply with this AD within the compliance times specified,
unless already done.

(g) Requirements

    Except as specified in paragraph (h) of this AD: Comply with all
required actions and compliance times specified in, and in
accordance with, paragraph A., of TCCA AD CF-2020-41.

(h) Exceptions to TCCA AD CF-2020-41

    (1) Where TCCA AD CF-2020-41 refers to its effective date, this
AD requires using the effective date of this AD.
    (2) Where paragraph A. of TCCA AD CF-2020-41 requires amending
the existing airplane flight manual (AFM) by ``incorporating the
SUPPLEMENT 21 Operation above 29000 feet from AFM Revision 15-A
dated 10 September 2020,'' this AD requires amending the existing
AFM by incorporating Supplement 21--Operation Above 29000 Feet, of
Airbus A220-100 Airplane Flight Manual, Publication BD500-3AB48-
22200-00, and Airbus A220-300 Airplane Flight Manual Publication
BD500-3AB48-32200-00, both Issue 016, dated October 16, 2020.
    (3) Where paragraph A. of TCCA AD CF-2020-41 specifies to
``[i]nform all flight crews of the new supplement and thereafter
operate the aeroplane accordingly,'' this AD does not require those
actions as those actions are already required by existing FAA
operating regulations.
    (4) Where paragraphs B. and C. of TCCA AD CF-2020-41 specify
procedures for a borescope inspection for signs of damage of the 1st
stage axial low-pressure compressor (LPC) rotor of each engine, to
be performed after the AFM N1 limitation has been exceeded, this AD
does not require that action.
    (5) Where paragraph C. of TCCA AD CF-2020-41 describes an
optional installation of health management unit reports to monitor
N1 exceedances, this AD does not include that option.

(i) Other FAA AD Provisions

    The following provisions also apply to this AD:
    (1) Alternative Methods of Compliance (AMOCs): The Manager, New
York ACO Branch, FAA, has the authority to approve AMOCs for this
AD, if requested using the procedures found in 14 CFR 39.19. In
accordance with 14 CFR 39.19, send your request to your principal
inspector or local Flight Standards District Office, as appropriate.
If sending information directly to the manager of the certification
office, send it to ATTN: Program Manager, Continuing Operational
Safety, FAA, New York ACO Branch, 1600 Stewart Avenue, Suite 410,
Westbury, NY 11590; telephone<PHONE_NUMBER>; fax<PHONE_NUMBER>. Before
using any approved AMOC, notify your appropriate principal
inspector, or lacking a principal inspector, the manager of the
local flight standards district office/certificate holding district
office.
    (2) Contacting the Manufacturer: For any requirement in this AD
to obtain instructions from a manufacturer, the instructions must be
accomplished using a method approved by the Manager, New York ACO
Branch, FAA; or TCCA; or Airbus Canada Limited Partnership's TCCA
Design Approval Organization (DAO). If approved by the DAO, the
approval must include the DAO-authorized signature.

(j) Related Information

    For more information about this AD, contact Thomas Niczky,
Aerospace Engineer, Avionics and Electrical Systems Section, FAA,
New York ACO Branch, 1600 Stewart Avenue, Suite 410, Westbury, NY
11590; telephone<PHONE_NUMBER>; fax<PHONE_NUMBER>; email [email protected].

(k) Material Incorporated by Reference

    (1) The Director of the Federal Register approved the
incorporation by reference (IBR) of the service information listed
in this paragraph under 5 U.S.C. 552(a) and 1 CFR part 51.
    (2) You must use this service information as applicable to do
the actions required by this AD, unless this AD specifies otherwise.
    (i) Supplement 21--Operation Above 29000 Feet, of Airbus A220-
100 Airplane Flight Manual, Publication BD500-3AB48-22200-00, Issue
016, dated October 16, 2020.
    (ii) Supplement 21--Operation Above 29000 Feet, of Airbus A220-
300 Airplane Flight Manual Publication BD500-3AB48-32200-00, Issue
016, dated October 16, 2020.
    (iii) Transport Canada Civil Aviation (TCCA) AD CF-2020-41,
issued October 15, 2020.
    (3) For TCCA AD CF-2020-41, contact TCCA, Transport Canada
National Aircraft Certification, 159 Cleopatra Drive, Nepean,
Ontario, K1A 0N5, CANADA; telephone<PHONE_NUMBER>; email [email protected]; internet https://tc.canada.ca/en/aviation.
    (4) For Airbus service information identified in this AD,
contact Airbus Canada Limited Partnership, 13100 Henri-Fabre
Boulevard, Mirabel, Qu[eacute]bec J7N 3C6, Canada; telephone 450-
476-7676; email [email protected]; internet https://a220world.airbus.com.
    (5) You may view this material at the FAA, Airworthiness
Products Section, Operational Safety Branch, 2200 South 216th St.,
Des Moines, WA. For information on the availability of this material
at the FAA, call<PHONE_NUMBER>. This material may be found in the AD
docket on the internet at https://www.regulations.gov by searching
for and locating Docket No. FAA-2021-0269.
    (6) You may view this material that is incorporated by reference
at the National Archives and Records Administration (NARA). For
information on the availability of this material at NARA, email
[email protected], or go to: https://www.archives.gov/federal-register/cfr/ibr-locations.html.

    Issued on July 30, 2021.
Lance T. Gant,
Director, Compliance & Airworthiness Division, Aircraft Certification
Service.

    Note:  This document was received for publication by the Office
of the Federal Register on December 14, 2021.

[FR Doc. 2021-27319 Filed 12-16-21; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910-13-P


[Federal Register Volume 87, Number 71 (Wednesday, April 13, 2022)]
[Notices]
[Page 22001]
[FR Doc No: 2022-07832]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

[SEC File No. 270-802, OMB Control No. 3235-0758]

Submission for OMB Review; Comment Request; Extension: Rule 30e-3

Upon Written Request, Copies Available From: Securities and Exchange
Commission, Office of FOIA Services, 100 F Street NE, Washington, DC
20549-2736

    Notice is hereby given that, under the Paperwork Reduction Act of
1995 (44 U.S.C. 3501 et seq.), (``Paperwork Reduction Act'') the
Securities and Exchange Commission (the ``Commission'') has submitted
to the Office of Management and Budget (``OMB'') a request for
extension of the previously approved collection of information
discussed below.
    Section 30(e) of the Investment Company Act of 1940 (15 U.S.C. 80a-
1 et seq.) (``Investment Company Act'') requires a registered
investment company (``fund'') to transmit to its shareholders, at least
semi-annually, reports containing financial statements and other
financial information as the Commission may prescribe by rules and
regulations. Rules 30e-1 (17 CFR 270.30e-1) and 30e-2 (17 CFR 270.30e-
2) under the Investment Company Act require most funds to send their
shareholders annual and semiannual reports containing financial
information on the fund.
    Rule 30e-3 (17 CFR 270.30e-3) under the Investment Company Act (15
U.S.C. 80a-1 et seq.) provides certain funds and unit investment trusts
with an optional method to satisfy shareholder report transmission
requirements by making such reports and certain other materials
publicly accessible on a website, as long as they satisfy certain other
conditions of the rule regarding: (a) Availability of the report and
other materials; (b) notice to investors of the website availability of
the report; and (c) delivery of paper copies of materials upon request.
Reliance on the rule is voluntary. Responses to the disclosure
requirements are not kept confidential.
    The Commission estimates that 13,079 funds could rely on rule 30e-
3. Of these funds, we estimate that 90% (or 11,771 funds) are currently
relying on rule 30e-3. With respect to these 11,771 funds, we estimate
that 90% (or 10,594 funds) already post shareholder reports on their
websites for other purposes. In total, rule 30e 3 will impose an
average total annual hour burden of 24,719 hours on applicable funds.
Based on the Commission's estimate of 24,719 hours and an estimated
wage rate of about $362 per hour, the total annual cost to registrants
of the hour burden for complying with rule 30-3 is about $8.9 million.
    Estimates of average burden hours are made solely for the purposes
of the Paperwork Reduction Act and are not derived from a comprehensive
or even representative survey or study of the costs of Commission rules
and forms. The collection of information under rule 30e-3 is mandatory.
The information provided under rule 30e-3 will not be kept
confidential. An agency may not conduct or sponsor, and a person is not
required to respond to, a collection of information unless it displays
a currently valid OMB control number.
    The public may view the background documentation for this
information collection at the following website, www.reginfo.gov.
Comments should be directed to: (i) Desk Officer for the Securities and
Exchange Commission, Office of Information and Regulatory Affairs,
Office of Management and Budget, Room 10102, New Executive Office
Building, Washington, DC 20503, or by sending an email to:
[email protected]; and (ii) David Bottom, Director/Chief
Information Officer, Securities and Exchange Commission, c/o John R.
Pezzullo, 100 F Street NE, Washington, DC 20549 or send an email to:
[email protected]. Written comments and recommendations for the
proposed information collection should be sent within 30 days May 13,
2022 of publication of this notice to www.reginfo.gov/public/do/PRAMain. Find this particular information collection by selecting
``Currently under 30-day Review--Open for Public Comments'' or by using
the search function.

    Dated: April 7, 2022.
J. Matthew DeLesDernier,
Assistant Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2022-07832 Filed 4-12-22; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 8011-01-P


[Federal Register: December 9, 2009 (Volume 74, Number 235)]
[Notices]
[Page 65114-65115]
[DOCID:fr09de09-42]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission

[Docket No. RM01-5-000]

Electronic Tariff Filings; Notice of Date for Submission of
Transitional Schedules

December 1, 2009.
    Take notice that the submission of proposed transitional schedules
for making baseline electronic tariff filings should be made by January
22, 2010.
    In Order No. 714,\1\ the Commission adopted regulations requiring
that tariff and tariff related filings must be made

electronically. The Commission provided that the conversion to
electronic tariff filings would begin April 1, 2010, with pipelines and
utilities filing baseline tariffs according to a six-month staggered
filing schedule worked out between staff and industry. Standard notice
and comment periods will apply to these baseline filings. Once an oil
or gas pipeline or electric utility has made its baseline filing, all
subsequent tariff-related filings must be made electronically.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \1\ Electronic Tariff Filings, Order No. 714, 73 FR 57,515 (Oct.
3, 2008), 124 FERC ] 61,270, FERC Stats. & Regs [Regulations
Preambles] ] 31,276 (2008) (Sept. 19, 2008).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    At the Commission staff technical conference held on November 20,
2009, staff indicated that, from its perspective, a filing schedule
would be acceptable as long as the baseline filings are reasonably
dispersed throughout the six month period. Having to process many
baseline applications at the same time would slow Commission processing
time and would work to the disadvantage of both the companies and the
Commission. Customers in comments on the Notice of Proposed Rulemaking
in this proceeding and at the conference expressed concern that filings
be staggered reasonably so that customers would not have to review a
large number of baseline filings at the same time. Interest was
expressed at the conference in providing the various industries an
opportunity to meet with their customer groups to develop a staggered
schedule that would balance the baseline filings longitudinally and
perhaps geographically.
    Commission staff will honor a consensus agreement so long as the
filings are generally spread over the six-month transition period.
Commission staff will issue a Notice of the filing schedule after
reviewing the comments received.
    For more information, contact Andre Goodson, Office of the General
Counsel, at<PHONE_NUMBER> or Keith Pierce, Office of Energy Market
Regulation at<PHONE_NUMBER> or by sending an e-mail to<EMAIL_ADDRESS>
Kimberly D. Bose,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. E9-29276 Filed 12-8-09; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 6717-01-P


<EPA REGISTRATION DIVISION COMPANY NOTICE OF FILING FOR PESTICIDE
PETITIONS PUBLISHED IN THE FEDERAL REGISTER  >

<EPA Registration Division contact: Donald Leming,<PHONE_NUMBER>>

<>

<TEMPLATE:>

<Lamberti USA Inc.>

<#091214>

<	EPA has received a pesticide petition #9E7621 from Lamberti USA Inc.,
161 Washington Street – Conshohocken, PA 19428 proposing, pursuant to
section 408(d) of the Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act (FFDCA), 21
U.S.C. 346a(d), to amend 40 CFR part 180.>

<	2. to establish an exemption from the requirement of a tolerance for>

<	40CFR§ 180.910 Alkyl polyGlucoside Esters (AGEs) group, formed by

D-Glucopyranose, oligomeric, 6-(dihydrogen
2-hydroxy-1,2,,3-propanetricarboxylate), 1-(C8-C20 linear and branched
alkyl) ethers, sodium salts (CAS No. 1079993-97-7);

D-Glucopyranose, oligomeric, 6-(hydrogen sulfobutanedioate), 1-(C8-C20
linear and branched alkyl) ethers, sodium salts (CAS No. 1079993-92-2)

D-Glucopyranose, oligomeric, Propanoic acid, 2-hydroxy-, 1-(C8-C20
linear and branched alkyl) ethers (CAS No. 1079993-94-4);

40CFR§ 180.920 Alkyl polyGlucoside Esters (AGE) group, formed by

D-Glucopyranose, oligomeric, 6-(dihydrogen
2-hydroxy-1,2,,3-propanetricarboxylate), 1-(C8-C20 linear and branched
alkyl) ethers, sodium salts (CAS No. 1079993-97-7);

D-Glucopyranose, oligomeric, 6-(hydrogen sulfobutanedioate), 1-(C8-C20
linear and branched alkyl) ethers, sodium salts (CAS No. 1079993-92-2)

D-Glucopyranose, oligomeric, Propanoic acid, 2-hydroxy-, 1-(C8-C20
linear and branched alkyl) ethers (CAS No. 1079993-94-4)

in or on the raw agricultural commodity [All] at [N/A-remove] parts per
million (ppm).  EPA has determined that the petition contains data or
information regarding the elements set forth in section 408 (d)(2) of
FDDCA; however, EPA has not fully evaluated the sufficiency of the
submitted data at this time or whether the data supports granting of the
petition. Additional data may be needed before EPA rules on the
petition.>

<A. Residue Chemistry

>

<	1. Plant metabolism. [No plant metabolism studies have been submitted
in support of this petition since an exemption from the requirement of a
tolerance is being requested. Based on available physicochemical data
(measured and calculated) it is anticipated that AGEs will degrade
rapidly and result in no appreciable crop residues]>

<	2. Analytical method. [NA – Remove Analytical methods for crop
commodities are not required for the establishment of a tolerance
exemption]>

<	3. Magnitude of residues. [AGEs surfactants have be exempted from
tolerance when used in accordance with good agricultural practices as
inert ingredients in pesticide formulations applied on growing crops
(pre-harvest and post-harvest) under 40 CFR § 180.910 and on growing
crops (pre-harvest) under 40 CFR § 180.920. Based on measured and
calculated physicochemical data, it is anticipated the use of AGEs
surfactants will not result in appreciable crop residues and that
environmental persistence and bioaccumulation are unlikely and not
anticipated.]>

<B. Toxicological Profile>

<	1. Acute toxicity.  [AGEs surfactants show in an acute oral toxicity
to rats an LD50 greater than 5,000 mg/kg and thus non-toxic by
ingestion. No acute dermal data are available]>

<	2. Genotoxicty. [Mutagenicity data on AGEs surfactants are available
for similar chemicals. All results indicate that AGEs have not mutagenic
potential in Ames test]>

<	3. Reproductive and developmental toxicity. [No Reproductive and
Developmental toxicity data were submitted for these category members.
However, information for the metabolites of these category members
(Alkyl polyglucoside, organic acids) shows no significant toxicity.> No
Reproductive and Developmental toxicity data were submitted for these
category members. However, information for the metabolites of these
category members (Alkyl polyglucoside, organic acids)  don’t show
significant toxicity. Available data for the organic acid and alkyl
polyglucoside category member address this endpoint for these two
category members using read across. For the embryo/fetotoxicity, the
teratogenicity and the maternal toxicity a NOAEL of 1000 mg/kg was
deduced for Alkyl polyglucosides. Carboxylic acids (Lactic and Citrate
Acid) are studied in different studies also for the implication in use
as food additives. No evidence of Reproductive and Developmental
toxicity were reported in different monographs and reports  under WHO
activities.  Succinates show NOAEL for reproduction/developmental
toxicity of 1,000 mg/kg bw/day in rats. An overall NOAEL of 1,000 mg/kg
bw/days can be considered for AGEs.]

<	4. Subchronic toxicity. [No sub-chronic or repeated dose toxicity data
were submitted for these category members. However, information for the
metabolites of these category members (Alkyl polyglucoside, organic
acids) shows no significant toxicity. Available data for the organic
acid and alkyl polyglucoside category member address this endpoint for
these two category members using read across. For the repeated dose
toxicity a NOAEL of 1000 mg/kg was deduced for Alkyl polyglucosides.
Carboxylic acids (Lactic and Citrate Acid) are studied in different
studies also for the implication in use as food additives. No evidence
of repeated dose toxicity was reported in different monographs and
reports under WHO activities.  Succinates show NOAEL for repeated dose
toxicity of 100 mg/kg bw/day in rats. An overall NOAEL of 100 mg/kg
bw/days can be considered for AGEs]>

<	5. Chronic toxicity. [No chronic toxicity data were submitted for
these category members. However, information for the metabolites of
these category members (Alkyl polyglucoside, organic acids) shows no
significant toxicity at chronic levels.]>

<	6. Animal metabolism. [There are no animal metabolism studies for the
AGEs  supporter herein but a metabolic pathway can be based on predicted
degradation products which are formed though the break of ester bond,
based on alkypolyglucoside cluster and Carboxylic acids or
sulfosuccinate moiety, for which metabolic pathway are known by
literature.]>

<	7. Metabolite toxicology. [The primary carboxylic acids, sodium
sulfosuccinate and the alkyl alcohol are not of toxicological concern
nor the alkylpolyglucoside. It is proposed that all metabolites are
rapidly conjugated and excreted. Toxicological studies indicate that the
alkyl alcohol or alkylpolyglucosides are non-mutagenic and have very low
acute and chronic toxicity.]>

<	8. Endocrine disruption. [The AGEs do not belong to a class of
chemical known or suspected of having adverse effects on the estrogen
receptor or endocrine system.]>

<C. Aggregate Exposure>

<	1. Dietary exposure. [The exposure assessment of AGEs was calculated
using

the Exposure and Fate Assessment Screening Tool, Version 2.0 (E-FAST2).

The calculated AGEs NOAELs are from 100 to 1000 mg/kg-bw/day and in

any case the potential exposure to all the AGEs is to be considered very

low in the case of dietary/food.]>

<	i. Food. [There are no data available on Alkyl polyGlucosides Esters
(AGEs) residues in food or on non occupational exposures to Alkyl
polyGlucosides Esters (AGEs).] >

<	ii. Drinking water. [The calculated AGEs NOAELs are from 100 to 1000

mg/kg-bw/day, corrected in Reference dose of 1-0.1 mg/kg-bw/day and in

any case the potential overall exposure to AGEs (considering the most

conservative estimation) is to be considered negligible in the case of

drinking water.]

>

<	2. Non-dietary exposure. [AGEs are used as surfactant, considering as

conservative approach, in concentration of 50% w/w in spray tank, and in
the

final pesticide formulation. The possible exposure to workers is derived

from the preparation and use.

A inhalation Unit Exposure of 2.00 mg/lb was used for an application

rate of 2.2 gal/day, the final result for the possible exposure

prediction is 25.14 mg/kg/day to compare with the NOAEL value of 100

mg/kg-bw/day, finally also the occupational (handler) potential

exposure to all the AGEs is to be considered low.]>

<D. Cumulative Effects>

<	[From the results of the tests conducted on AGEs and the results
obtained by main degradation products, no evidence of any specific
target organ toxicity has been produced. Therefore, there is no evidence
of a common mechanism of toxicity with any other substance, and there is
no reason to expect that the use of AGEs will contribute to any
cumulative toxicity resulting from exposures to other substances having
a common mechanism of toxicity.]>

<E. Safety Determination>

<	1. U.S. population. [The results of the acute, genotoxic, sub-acute
and developmental toxicity studies conducted on AGEs or similar
chemicals indicate a relatively low order of toxicity. A similar AGE
ester and structurally similar alkyl glucopyranosides currently exempted
from the requirement of a tolerance, also appear on EPA's List 4B Inert
List, and in  Inert Ingredients Permitted for Use in  Nonfood Use
Pesticide Products Last Updated January 27, 2009. Therefore, due to the
low order of toxicity of AGEs and the lack of known adverse human health
effects associated with this class of chemicals, the exemption from the
requirement of a tolerance on growing crops only is not expected to
result in any new, or adverse effects to human health or the
environment].

>

<	2. Infants and children. [Exposure to AGEs to infants and children is
not expected to occur. The substances will be used as an inert
ingredients at low levels on growing crops, and any residual levels are
expected to be insignificant and consistent with structurally similar
alkyl glucopyranosides currently exempted from the requirement of a
tolerance.]>

<F. International Tolerances>

<	[There is no known international tolerance for AGEs.]>

 PAGE

Page   PAGE  5  of   NUMPAGES   5

LAMBERTI USA - NOTICE OF FILING 28 January 2010	Page   PAGE  1  of
NUMPAGES   4


[Federal Register: April 2, 2008 (Volume 73, Number 64)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Page 17888-17890]
[DOCID:fr02ap08-4]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION

Federal Aviation Administration

14 CFR Part 71

[Docket No. FAA-2008-0024; Airspace Docket No. 08-AGL-4]

Amendment of Class E Airspace; Black River Falls, WI

AGENCY: Federal Aviation Administration (FAA), DOT.

ACTION: Direct final rule; request for comments.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: This action amends Class E airspace at Black River Falls, WI.
Additional controlled airspace is necessary to accommodate aircraft
using new Area Navigation (RNAV) Global Positioning System (GPS)
Standard Instrument Approach Procedures (SIAP) at Black River Falls
Area Airport. The FAA proposes this action to enhance the safety and
management of Instrument Flight Rules (IFR) aircraft operations at
Black River Falls Area Airport, Black River Falls, WI.

DATES: Effective Dates: 0901 UTC June 5, 2008. Comments for inclusion
in the rules Docket must be received May 19, 2008. The Director of the
Federal Register approves this incorporation by reference action under
Title 1, Code of Federal Regulations, part 51, subject to the annual
revision of FAA Order 7400.9 and publication of conforming amendments.

ADDRESSES: Send comments on this proposal to the U.S. Department of
Transportation, Docket Operations, 1200 New Jersey Avenue, SE, West
Building Ground Floor, Room WI2-140, Washington, DC 20590-0001. You
must identify the docket number FAA-2008-0024/Airspace Docket No. 08-
AGL-4, at the beginning of your comments. You may also submit comments
through the Internet at http://regulations.gov. You may review the
public docket containing the proposal, any comments received, and any
final disposition in person in the Dockets Office between 9 a.m. and 5
p.m., Monday through Friday, except Federal holidays. The Docket
Office, telephone number 1-800-647-5527, is on the ground floor of the
building at the above address.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Joe Yadouga, Central Service Center,
System Support Group, Federal Aviation Administration, Southwest
Region, Fort Worth, Texas, 76193-0530; telephone number<PHONE_NUMBER>.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

The Direct Final Rule Procedure

    The FAA anticipates that this regulation will not result in adverse
or negative comments, and, therefore, issues it as a direct final rule.
Unless a written adverse or negative comment or a written notice of
intent to submit an adverse or negative comment is received within the
comment period, the regulation will become effective on the date
specified above. After the close of the comment period, the FAA will
publish a document in the Federal Register indicating that no adverse
or negative comments were received and confirming the effective date of
the rule. If the FAA receives, within the comment period, an adverse or
negative comment, or written comment notice of intent to submit such a
comment, a document withdrawing the direct final rule will be published
in the Federal Register, and a notice of proposed rulemaking may be
published with a new comment period.

Comments Invited

    Although this action is in the form of a direct final rule, and was
not preceded by a notice of proposed rulemaking, interested persons are
invited to comment on this rule by submitting such written data, views,
or arguments as they may desire. Comments that provide the factual
basis supporting the views and suggestions presented are particularly
helpful in developing reasoned regulatory decisions on the direct final
rule. Comments are specifically invited on the overall regulatory,
aeronautical, economic, environmental, and energy-related aspects of
the direct final rule. Commenters wishing the FAA to acknowledge
receipt of their comments on this rule must submit with those comments
a self-addressed, stamped postcard on which the following statement is
made: ``Comments to Docket No. FAA-2008-0024, Airspace Docket No. 08-
AGL-4.'' The postcard will be date/time stamped and returned to the
commenter. Communications should identify both docket numbers and be
submitted in triplicate to the address specified under the caption
ADDRESSES above or through the Web site. All communications received on
or before the closing date for comments will be considered, and this
rule may be amended or withdrawn in light of the comments received.

The Rule

    This amendment to Title 14, Code of Federal Regulations (14 CFR)
part 71, modifies Class E airspace at Black River Falls, WI, by
providing additional airspace required to support the new RNAV (GPS)
Runway 08 approach developed for IFR landings at Black River Falls Area
Airport. Controlled airspace extending upward from 700 feet above the
surface is required to encompass all SIAP and for the safety of IFR
operations at Black River Falls Area Airport, Black River Falls, WI.
Designations for Class E airspace areas extending upward from 700 feet
above the surface of the earth are published in the FAA Order 7400.9R,
signed August 15, 2007 and effective September 15, 2007, which is
incorporated by reference in 14 CFR 71.1. Class E designations listed
in this document will be published subsequently in the Order.

Agency Findings

    The regulations adopted herein will not have substantial direct
effect on the States, on the relationship between the national
government and the States, or on the distribution of power and
responsibilities among various levels of government. Therefore, it is
determined that this final rule does not have federalism implication
under Executive Order 13132.
    The FAA has determined that this regulation only involves an
established body of technical regulations for which frequent and
routine amendments are necessary to keep them operationally current, is
non-controversial and unlikely to result in adverse or negative
comments. It, therefore, (1) is not a ``significant regulatory action''
under Executive Order 12866; (2) is not a ``significant rule'' under
DOT Regulatory Policies and Procedures (44 FR 11034; February 26,
1979); and (3) does not warrant preparation of a Regulatory Evaluation
as the anticipated impact is so minimal since this is a routine matter
that will only affect air traffic procedures and air navigation. It is
certified that this rule, when promulgated, will not have a significant
economic impact on a substantial number of small entities under the
criteria of the Regulatory Flexibility Act.
    The FAA's authority to issue rules regarding aviation safety is
found in Title 49, of the United States Code, Subtitle I, Section 106,
describes the authority of the FAA Administrator, Subtitle VII,
Aviation Programs, described in more detail the scope of the agency's
authority.
    This rulemaking is promulgated under the authority described in
subtitle VII, Part A, subpart I, section 40103. Under that section, the
FAA is charged with prescribing regulations to assign the use of
airspace necessary to ensure the safety of aircraft and the efficient
use of airspace. This regulation is within the scope of that authority
as it provides additional controlled airspace at Black River Falls Area
Airport, WI.

List of Subjects in 14 CFR Part 71

    Airspace, Incorporation by reference, Navigation (Air).

Adoption of the Amendment

0
In consideration of the foregoing, the Federal Aviation Administration
amends 14 CFR part 71 as follows:

PART 71--DESIGNATION OF CLASS A, B, C, D AND E AIRSPACE AREAS; AIR
TRAFFIC SERVICE ROUTES; AND REPORTING POINTS

0
1. The authority citation for part 71 continues to read as follows:

    Authority: 49 U.S.C. 106(g); 40103, 40113, 40120; E.O. 10854, 24
FR 9565, 3 CFR, 1959-1963, Comp., p. 389.

Sec.  71.1  Amended

0
2. The incorporation by reference in 14 CFR 71.1 of the Federal
Aviation Administration Order 7400.9R, Airspace Designation and
Reporting Points, signed August 15, 2007, and effective September 15,
2007, is amended as follows:

Paragraph 6005 Class E airspace areas extending upward from 700
feet above the surface of the earth.

* * * * *

AGL WI E5 Black River Falls, WI [Amended]

Black River Falls Area Airport
    (Lat 44[deg]15'03'' N, long 90[deg]51'19'' W)

    That airspace extending upward from 700 feet above the surface
within a 6.4-mile radius of the Black River Falls Area Airport and
within 2.7 miles each side of the 253[deg] bearing from the Black
River Falls Area Airport, extending from the 6.4-mile radius to 7.4
miles southwest of the airport; and within 3.85 miles each side of
the 260[deg] bearing from the Black River Falls Area Airport
extending from the 6.4-mile radius to 8.8 miles southwest of the
airport.
* * * * *

    Issued in Fort Worth, TX, on March 20, 2008.
Ronnie L. Uhlenhaker,
Acting Manager, System Support Group, ATO Central Service Center.
[FR Doc. E8-6580 Filed 4-1-08; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4910-13-M