[Federal Register: July 13, 2010 (Volume 75, Number 133)]
[Proposed Rules]
[Page 39863-39868]
[DOCID:fr13jy10-22]

========================================================================
Proposed Rules
                                                Federal Register
________________________________________________________________________

This section of the FEDERAL REGISTER contains notices to the public of
the proposed issuance of rules and regulations. The purpose of these
notices is to give interested persons an opportunity to participate in
the rule making prior to the adoption of the final rules.

========================================================================

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION

Federal Aviation Administration

14 CFR Part 39

[Docket No. FAA-2010-0680; Directorate Identifier 2008-NM-195-AD]
RIN 2120-AA64

Airworthiness Directives; Airbus Model A310 Series Airplanes

AGENCY: Federal Aviation Administration (FAA), DOT.

ACTION: Notice of proposed rulemaking (NPRM).

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: We propose to adopt a new airworthiness directive (AD) for the
products listed above that would supersede an existing AD. This
proposed AD results from mandatory continuing airworthiness information
(MCAI) originated by an aviation authority of another country to
identify and correct an unsafe condition on an aviation product. The
MCAI describes the unsafe condition as: Analysis performed in the frame
of the Extended Service Goal has led Airbus to modify the inspection
programme [modification of thresholds, intervals and associated
configurations] which is currently required by DGAC (Direction
G[eacute]n[eacute]rale de l'Aviation Civile) France AD F-2005-001. This
modified inspection programme is necessary to detect and prevent damage
associated with a structural fatigue phenomenon of the rear spar
internal angle and the tee fitting located in the centre wing box. This
condition, if not corrected, could affect the structural integrity of
the centre wing box. The unsafe condition is reduced structural
integrity of the wings. The proposed AD would require actions that are
intended to address the unsafe condition described in the MCAI.

DATES: We must receive comments on this proposed AD by August 27, 2010.

ADDRESSES: You may send comments by any of the following methods:
     Federal eRulemaking Portal: Go to http://
www.regulations.gov. Follow the instructions for submitting comments.
     Fax:<PHONE_NUMBER>.
     Mail: U.S. Department of Transportation, Docket
Operations, M-30, West Building Ground Floor, Room W12-140, 1200 New
Jersey Avenue, SE., Washington, DC 20590.
     Hand Delivery: U.S. Department of Transportation, Docket
Operations, M-30, West Building Ground Floor, Room W12-40, 1200 New
Jersey Avenue, SE., Washington, DC, between 9 a.m. and 5 p.m., Monday
through Friday, except Federal holidays.
    For service information identified in this proposed AD, contact
Airbus SAS--EAW (Airworthiness Office), 1 Rond Point Maurice Bellonte,
31707 Blagnac Cedex, France; telephone: +33 5 61 93 36 96; fax: +33 5
61 93 44 51; e-mail<EMAIL_ADDRESS>Internet: http://
www.airbus.com. You may review copies of the referenced service
information at the FAA, Transport Airplane Directorate, 1601 Lind
Avenue, SW., Renton, Washington. For information on the availability of
this material at the FAA, call<PHONE_NUMBER>.

Examining the AD Docket

    You may examine the AD docket on the Internet at http://
www.regulations.gov; or in person at the Docket Operations office
between 9 a.m. and 5 p.m., Monday through Friday, except Federal
holidays. The AD docket contains this proposed AD, the regulatory
evaluation, any comments received, and other information. The street
address for the Docket Operations office (telephone<PHONE_NUMBER>) is
in the ADDRESSES section. Comments will be available in the AD docket
shortly after receipt.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Dan Rodina, Aerospace Engineer,
International Branch, ANM-116, FAA, Transport Airplane Directorate,
1601 Lind Avenue, SW., Renton, Washington 98055-4056; telephone (425)
227-2125; fax<PHONE_NUMBER>.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

Comments Invited

    We invite you to send any written relevant data, views, or
arguments about this proposed AD. Send your comments to an address
listed under the ADDRESSES section. Include ``Docket No. FAA-2010-0680;
Directorate Identifier 2008-NM-195-AD'' at the beginning of your
comments. We specifically invite comments on the overall regulatory,
economic, environmental, and energy aspects of this proposed AD. We
will consider all comments received by the closing date and may amend
this proposed AD based on those comments.
    We have lengthened the 30-day comment period for proposed ADs that
address MCAI originated by aviation authorities of other countries to
provide adequate time for interested parties to submit comments. The
comment period for these proposed ADs is now typically 45 days, which
is consistent with the comment period for domestic transport ADs.
    We will post all comments we receive, without change, to http://
www.regulations.gov; including any personal information you provide. We
will also post a report summarizing each substantive verbal contact we
receive about this proposed AD.

Discussion

    On April 20, 2006, we issued AD 2006-09-05, Amendment 39-14575 (71
FR 25921, May 3, 2006). That AD required actions intended to address an
unsafe condition on the products listed above.
    Since we issued AD 2006-09-05, the manufacturer has modified the
inspection program currently required by AD 2006-09-05 by reducing
certain compliance times. The European Aviation Safety Agency (EASA),
which is the Technical Agent for the Member States of the European
Community, has issued EASA Airworthiness Directive 2008-0187, dated
October 10, 2008 (referred to after this as ``the MCAI''), to correct
an unsafe condition for the specified products. The MCAI states:

    Analysis performed in the frame of the Extended Service Goal has
led Airbus to modify the inspection programme [modification of
thresholds, intervals and associated configurations] which is
currently required by DGAC (Direction G[eacute]n[eacute]rale de
l'Aviation Civile) France AD F-2005-001 [which corresponds to FAA AD
2006-09-05].
    This modified inspection programme is necessary to detect and
prevent damage associated with a structural fatigue phenomenon of
the rear spar internal angle and the tee fitting located in the
centre wing box. This condition, if not corrected, could affect the
structural integrity of the centre wing box.

    For the reason stated above, this new EASA AD retains the
requirements of DGAC France AD F-2005-001, which is superseded, and
refers to the latest revision of Airbus Service Bulletin (SB) A310-
57-2047.

The unsafe condition is reduced structural integrity of the wings. This
AD retains the requirements of AD 2006-09-05, but with certain reduced
compliance times. The required actions include doing repetitive
rotating probe inspections for any crack of the rear spar internal
angle and the left and right sides of the tee fitting, and doing
related investigative/corrective actions if necessary. The actions also
include modifying the holes in the internal angle and tee fitting by
cold expansion. You may obtain further information by examining the
MCAI in the AD docket.

Relevant Service Information

    Airbus has issued Service Bulletin A310-57-2047, Revision 08, dated
July 2, 2009; and Mandatory Service Bulletin A310-57-2035, Revision 10,
dated March 25, 2008. The actions described in this service information
are intended to correct the unsafe condition identified in the MCAI.

FAA's Determination and Requirements of This Proposed AD

    This product has been approved by the aviation authority of another
country, and is approved for operation in the United States. Pursuant
to our bilateral agreement with the State of Design Authority, we have
been notified of the unsafe condition described in the MCAI and service
information referenced above. We are proposing this AD because we
evaluated all pertinent information and determined an unsafe condition
exists and is likely to exist or develop on other products of the same
type design.

Differences Between This AD and the MCAI or Service Information

    We have reviewed the MCAI and related service information and, in
general, agree with their substance. But we might have found it
necessary to use different words from those in the MCAI to ensure the
AD is clear for U.S. operators and is enforceable. In making these
changes, we do not intend to differ substantively from the information
provided in the MCAI and related service information.
    We might also have proposed different actions in this AD from those
in the MCAI in order to follow FAA policies. Any such differences are
highlighted in a NOTE within the proposed AD.

Costs of Compliance

    Based on the service information, we estimate that this proposed AD
would affect about 66 products of U.S. registry.
    The actions that are required by AD 2006-09-05 and retained in this
proposed AD take up to 600 work-hours per product, at an average labor
rate of $85 per work hour. Required parts cost up to $38,900 per
product. Based on these figures, the estimated cost of the currently
required actions is up to $89,900 per product.
    This new AD adds no new costs to affected operators; the
manufacturer has modified the inspection program currently required by
AD 2006-09-05, this proposed AD reduces the compliance times required
by the existing AD.

Authority for This Rulemaking

    Title 49 of the United States Code specifies the FAA's authority to
issue rules on aviation safety. Subtitle I, section 106, describes the
authority of the FAA Administrator. ``Subtitle VII: Aviation
Programs,'' describes in more detail the scope of the Agency's
authority.
    We are issuing this rulemaking under the authority described in
``Subtitle VII, Part A, Subpart III, Section 44701: General
requirements.'' Under that section, Congress charges the FAA with
promoting safe flight of civil aircraft in air commerce by prescribing
regulations for practices, methods, and procedures the Administrator
finds necessary for safety in air commerce. This regulation is within
the scope of that authority because it addresses an unsafe condition
that is likely to exist or develop on products identified in this
rulemaking action.

Regulatory Findings

    We determined that this proposed AD would not have federalism
implications under Executive Order 13132. This proposed AD would not
have a substantial direct effect on the States, on the relationship
between the national Government and the States, or on the distribution
of power and responsibilities among the various levels of government.
    For the reasons discussed above, I certify this proposed
regulation:
    1. Is not a ``significant regulatory action'' under Executive Order
12866;
    2. Is not a ``significant rule'' under the DOT Regulatory Policies
and Procedures (44 FR 11034, February 26, 1979); and
    3. Will not have a significant economic impact, positive or
negative, on a substantial number of small entities under the criteria
of the Regulatory Flexibility Act.
    We prepared a regulatory evaluation of the estimated costs to
comply with this proposed AD and placed it in the AD docket.

List of Subjects in 14 CFR Part 39

    Air transportation, Aircraft, Aviation safety, Incorporation by
reference, Safety.

The Proposed Amendment

    Accordingly, under the authority delegated to me by the
Administrator, the FAA proposes to amend 14 CFR part 39 as follows:

PART 39--AIRWORTHINESS DIRECTIVES

    1. The authority citation for part 39 continues to read as follows:

    Authority: 49 U.S.C. 106(g), 40113, 44701.

Sec.  39.13  [Amended]

    2. The FAA amends Sec.  39.13 by removing Amendment 39-14575 (71 FR
25921, May 3, 2006) and adding the following new AD:

Airbus: Docket No. FAA-2010-0680; Directorate Identifier 2008-NM-
195-AD.

Comments Due Date

    (a) We must receive comments by August 27, 2010.

Affected ADs

    (b) This AD supersedes AD 2006-09-05, Amendment 39-14575. This
AD also affects certain requirements of AD 98-26-01, Amendment 39-
10942.

Applicability

    (c) This AD applies to all Airbus Model A310-203, -204, -221, -
222, -304, -322, -324, and -325 airplanes, certificated in any
category.

Subject

    (d) Air Transport Association (ATA) of America Code 57: Wings.

Reason

    (e) The mandatory continuing airworthiness information (MCAI)
states:

    Analysis performed in the frame of the Extended Service Goal has
led Airbus to modify the inspection programme [modification of
thresholds, intervals and associated configurations] which is
currently required by DGAC (Direction G[eacute]n[eacute]rale de
l'Aviation Civile) France AD F-2005-001 [which corresponds to FAA AD
2006-09-05].
    This modified inspection programme is necessary to detect and
prevent damage associated with a structural fatigue phenomenon of
the rear spar internal angle and the tee fitting located in the
centre wing box. This condition, if not corrected, could affect the
structural integrity of the centre wing box.

The unsafe condition is reduced structural integrity of the wings.

Compliance

    (f) You are responsible for having the actions required by this
AD performed within the compliance times specified, unless the
actions have already been done.

RESTATEMENT OF CERTAIN REQUIREMENTS OF AD 2006-09-05 MODIFICATION

    (g) For all airplanes except those that are modified by Airbus
Modifications 06672S6812, 06673S6813, and 07387S7974 in production:
Within 60 months after June 7, 2006 (the effective date of AD 2006-
09-05), modify the holes in the internal angle and tee fitting and
do all applicable related investigative and corrective actions by
accomplishing all the actions specified in the Accomplishment
Instructions of Airbus Service Bulletin A310-57-2035, Revision 08,
dated September 19, 2005; or Airbus Mandatory Service Bulletin A310-
57-2035, Revision 10, dated March 25, 2008; except as required by
paragraph (h) of this AD. Do all applicable related investigative
and corrective actions before further flight. As of the effective
date of this AD, use only Airbus Mandatory Service Bulletin A310-57-
2035, Revision 10, dated March 25, 2008.

Contact the FAA

    (h) Where the service information specified in Table 1 of this
AD specifies to contact the manufacturer if certain cracks are
found, before further flight, repair those conditions according to a
method approved by either the Manager, International Branch, ANM-
116, Transport Airplane Directorate, FAA; or the Direction
G[eacute]n[eacute]rale de l'Aviation Civile (DGAC) (or its delegated
agent); or EASA (or its delegated agent).

                      Table 1--Service Information
------------------------------------------------------------------------
           Document               Revision               Date
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Airbus Mandatory Service                 10  March 25, 2008.
 Bulletin A310-57-2035.
Airbus Service Bulletin A310-            08  September 19, 2005.
 57-2035.
------------------------------------------------------------------------

Actions Accomplished According to Previous Issues of Airbus Service
Bulletin A310-57-2035

    (i) Actions accomplished before June 7, 2006, in accordance with
the service information specified in Table 2 of this AD, are
considered acceptable for compliance with the corresponding actions
specified in paragraph (g) of this AD.

        Table 2--Previous Issues of Service Bulletin A310-57-2035
------------------------------------------------------------------------
           Document               Revision               Date
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Airbus Service Bulletin A310-             1  October 13, 1989.
 57-2035.
Airbus Service Bulletin A310-             2  February 26, 1990.
 57-2035.
Airbus Service Bulletin A310-             3  May 23, 1990.
 57-2035.
Airbus Service Bulletin A310-             4  April 15, 1992.
 57-2035.
Airbus Service Bulletin A310-             5  May 27, 1992.
 57-2035.
Airbus Service Bulletin A310-             6  March 8, 1994.
 57-2035.
Airbus Service Bulletin A310-             7  April 17, 1996.
 57-2035.
------------------------------------------------------------------------

NEW REQUIREMENTS OF THIS AD--REVISED COMPLIANCE TIMES FOR INSPECTIONS
REQUIRED BY AD 2006-09-05

Initial and Repetitive Inspections of the Rear Spar Internal Angle

    (j) For airplanes on which an inspection of the rear spar
internal angle has not been done in accordance with Airbus Service
Bulletin A310-57-2047 as of the effective date of this AD: At the
later of the times specified in paragraphs (j)(1) and (j)(2) of this
AD, do a rotating probe inspection for any crack of the rear spar
internal angle located in the center wing box and do all applicable
related investigative and corrective actions, in accordance with the
Accomplishment Instructions of Airbus Service Bulletin A310-57-2047,
Revision 08, dated July 2, 2009; except as required by paragraphs
(n) and (o) of this AD. Do all applicable related investigative and
corrective actions before further flight. Repeat the inspection
thereafter at the applicable time specified in Table 4 of this AD.
Certain compliance times are applicable to short range use, average
flight time (AFT) equal to or less than 4 hours, or long range use,
AFT exceeding 4 hours.

    Note 1:  To establish the AFT, divide the accumulated flight
time (counted from the take-off up to the landing) by the number of
accumulated flight cycles. This gives the average flight time per
flight cycle.

    (1) Within the applicable time specified in Table 3 of this AD.
    (2) Within the applicable time specified in paragraph (j)(2)(i),
(j)(2)(ii), or (j)(2)(iii) of this AD:
    (i) For A310-203, -204, -221, and -222 airplanes: Within 700
flight cycles or 1,500 flight hours after the effective date of this
AD, whichever occurs first.
    (ii) For A310-304, -322, -324, and -325 short range airplanes:
Within 700 flight cycles or 1,900 flight hours after the effective
date of this AD, whichever occurs first.
    (iii) For A310-304, -322, -324, and -325 long range airplanes:
Within 500 flight cycles or 2,500 flight hours after the effective
date of this AD, whichever occurs first.

               Table 3--Initial Inspection Internal Angle
------------------------------------------------------------------------

------------------------------------------------------------------------
   Model and configuration     Compliance time (whichever occurs first)
------------------------------------------------------------------------
A310-203, -204, -221, and -   Before the            Before the
 222 airplanes on which Mod    accumulation of       accumulation of
 6672S6812 and Mod 7387S7974   9,200 total flight    18,500 total flight
 are not done.                 cycles.               hours.
A310-203, -204, -221, and -   Before the            Before the
 222 airplanes on which Mod    accumulation of       accumulation of
 6672S6812 and Mod 7387S7974   19,800 total flight   39,600 total flight
 are done in production.       cycles.               hours.

A310-203, -204, -221, and -   Within 19,800 flight  Within 39,600 flight
 222 airplanes on which Mod    cycles after the      hours after the
 6672S6812 and Mod 7387S7974   effective date of     effective date of
 are done in accordance with   this AD.              this AD.
 Airbus Service Bulletin
 A310-57-2035 and before the
 accumulation of 6,200 total
 flight cycles and 12,500
 total flight hours.
A310-203, -204, -221, and -   Within 8,200 flight   Within 16,400 flight
 222 airplanes on which Mod    cycles after the      hours after the
 6672S6812 and Mod 7387S7974   effective date of     effective date of
 are done in accordance with   this AD.              this AD.
 Airbus Service Bulletin
 A310-57-2035 and are not
 done before the
 accumulation of 6,200 total
 flight cycles and 12,500
 total flight hours.
A310-304, -322, -324, and -   Before the            Before the
 325 short range airplanes     accumulation of       accumulation of
 on which Mod 6672S6812 and    7,500 total flight    21,100 total flight
 Mod 7387S7974 are not done.   cycles.               hours.
A310-304, -322, -324, and -   Before the            Before the
 325 long range airplanes on   accumulation of       accumulation of
 which Mod 6672S6812 and Mod   5,300 total flight    26,900 total flight
 7387S7974 are not done.       cycles.               hours.
A310-304, -322, -324, and -   Before the            Before the
 325 short range airplanes     accumulation of       accumulation of
 on which Mod 6672S6812 and    15,900 total flight   44,700 total flight
 Mod 7387S7974 are done.       cycles.               hours.
A310-304, -322, -324, and -   Before the            Before the
 325 long range airplanes on   accumulation of       accumulation of
 which Mod 6672S6812 and Mod   11,300 total flight   56,900 total flight
 7387S7974 are done in         cycles.               hours.
 production.
A310-304, -322, -324, and -   Within 15,900 flight  Within 44,700 flight
 325 short range airplanes     cycles after the      hours after the
 on which Mod 6672S6812 and    effective date of     effective date of
 Mod 7387S7974 are done in     this AD.              this AD.
 accordance with Airbus
 Service Bulletin A310-57-
 2035 and before the
 accumulation of 4,700 total
 flight cycles and 13,100
 total flight hours.
A310-304, -322, -324, and -   Within 8,500 flight   Within 23,800 flight
 325 short range airplanes     cycles after the      hours after the
 on which Mod 6672S6812 and    effective date of     effective date of
 Mod 7387S7974 are done in     this AD.              this AD.
 accordance with Airbus
 Service Bulletin A310-57-
 2035 and not done before
 the accumulation of 4,700
 total flight cycles and
 13,100 total flight hours.
A310-304, -322, -324, and -   Within 11,300 flight  Within 56,900 flight
 325 long range airplanes on   cycles after the      hours after the
 which Mod 6672S6812 and Mod   effective date of     effective date of
 7387S7974 are done in         this AD.              this AD.
 accordance with Airbus
 Service Bulletin A310-57-
 2035 before the
 accumulation of 3,300 total
 flight cycles and 16,700
 total flight hours.
A310-304, -322, -324, and -   Within 6,000 flight   Within 30,300 flight
 325 long range airplanes on   cycles after the      hours after the
 which Mod 6672S6812 and Mod   effective date of     effective date of
 7387S7974 are done in         this AD.              this AD.
 accordance with Airbus
 Service Bulletin A310-57-
 2035 and not done before
 the accumulation of 3,300
 total flight cycles and
 16,700 total flight hours.
------------------------------------------------------------------------

                      Table 4--Repetitive Intervals
------------------------------------------------------------------------
        Model and configuration              Interval (not to exceed)
------------------------------------------------------------------------
A310-203, -204, -221, and -222           Within 7,200 flight cycles or
 airplanes.                               14,400 flight hours, whichever
                                          occurs first.
A310-304, -322, -324, and -325 short     Within 6,800 flight cycles or
 range airplanes.                         19,100 flight hours, whichever
                                          occurs first.
A310-304, -322, -324, and -325 long      Within 4,800 flight cycles or
 range airplanes.                         24,300 flight hours, whichever
                                          occurs first.
------------------------------------------------------------------------

    (k) For airplanes on which an inspection of the rear spar
internal angle has been done in accordance with Airbus Service
Bulletin A310-57-2047 as of the effective date of this AD: At the
applicable time specified in paragraphs (k)(1), (k)(2), and (k)(3)
of this AD, do a rotating probe inspection for any crack of the rear
spar internal angle located in the center wing box and do all
applicable related investigative and corrective actions, in
accordance with the Accomplishment Instructions of Airbus Service
Bulletin A310-57-2047, Revision 08, dated July 2, 2009; except as
required by paragraphs (n) and (o) of this AD. Do all applicable
related investigative and corrective actions before further flight.
Repeat the inspection thereafter at the applicable time specified in
Table 4 of this AD. Certain compliance times are applicable to short
range use, AFT equal to or less than 4 hours, or long range use, AFT
exceeding 4 hours.
    (1) For A310-203, -204, -221, and -222 airplanes: At the earlier
of the times specified in paragraphs (k)(1)(i) and (k)(1)(ii) of
this AD.
    (i) Within 7,940 flight cycles or 15,880 flight hours after the
most recent inspection, whichever occurs first.
    (ii) At the later of the times specified in paragraphs
(k)(1)(ii)(A) and (k)(1)(ii)(B) of this AD.
    (A) Within the applicable interval specified in Table 4 of this
AD.
    (B) Within 740 flight cycles or 1,480 flight hours after the
effective date of this AD, whichever occurs first.
    (2) For A310-304, -322, -324, and -325 short range airplanes: At
the later of the times

specified in paragraphs (k)(2)(i) and (k)(2)(ii) of this AD.
    (i) Within the applicable interval specified in Table 4 of this
AD.
    (ii) Within 700 flight cycles or 1,900 flight hours after the
effective date of this AD, whichever occurs first.
    (3) For A310-304, -322, -324, and -325 long range airplanes: At
the later of the times specified in paragraphs (k)(3)(i) and
(k)(3)(ii) of this AD.
    (i) Within the applicable interval specified in Table 4 of this
AD.
    (ii) Within 500 flight cycles or 2,500 flight hours after the
effective date of this AD, whichever occurs first.

Initial and Repetitive Inspections of the Tee Fitting

    (l) For airplanes on which an inspection of the left and right
sides of the tee fitting has not been done in accordance with Airbus
Service Bulletin A310-57-2047 as of the effective date of this AD:
At the later of the times specified in paragraphs (l)(1) and (l)(2)
of this AD, do a rotating probe inspection for any crack of the left
and right sides of the tee fitting, and do all applicable related
investigative and corrective actions, in accordance with the
Accomplishment Instructions of Airbus Service Bulletin A310-57-2047,
Revision 08, dated July 2, 2009; except as required by paragraphs
(n) and (o) of this AD. Do all applicable related investigative and
corrective actions before further flight. Repeat the inspection
thereafter at the applicable time specified in Table 6 of this AD.
Certain compliance times are applicable to short range use, AFT
equal to or less than 4 hours, or long range use, AFT exceeding 4
hours.
    (1) Within the applicable time specified in Table 5 of this AD.
    (2) Within the applicable time in paragraph (l)(2)(i),
(l)(2)(ii), or (l)(2)(iii) of this AD.
    (i) For A310-203, -204, -221, and -222 airplanes: Within 800
flight cycles or 1,600 flight hours, whichever occurs first.
    (ii) For A310-304, -322, -324, and -325 short range airplanes:
Within 800 flight cycles or 2,200 flight hours, whichever occurs
first.
    (iii) For A310-304, -322, -324, and -325 long range airplanes:
Within 600 flight cycles or 3,100 flight hours, whichever occurs
first.

                 Table 5--Initial Inspection Tee Fitting
------------------------------------------------------------------------

------------------------------------------------------------------------
   Model and configuration     Compliance time (whichever occurs first)
------------------------------------------------------------------------
A310-203, -204, -221, and -   Before the            Within 28,700 flight
 222 airplanes on which Mod    accumulation of       hours after the
 6673S6813 is not done.        14,300 flight         effective date of
                               cycles.               this AD.
A310-203, -204, -221, and -   Before the            Before the
 222 airplanes on which Mod    accumulation of       accumulation of
 6673S6813 is done in          17,500 total flight   35,000 total flight
 production.                   cycles.               hours.
A310-203, -204, -221, and -   Within 17,500 flight  Within 35,000 flight
 222 airplanes on which Mod    cycles after the      hours after the
 6673S6813 is done in          effective date of     effective date of
 accordance with Airbus        this AD.              this AD.
 Service Bulletin A310-57-
 2035 and before the
 accumulation of 8,100 total
 flight cycles and 16,200
 total flight hours.
A310-203, -204, -221, and -   Within 9,600 flight   Within 19,200 flight
 222 airplanes on which Mod    cycles after the      hours after the
 6673S6813 is done in          effective date of     effective date of
 accordance with Airbus        this AD.              this AD.
 Service Bulletin A310-57-
 2035 and not before the
 accumulation of 8,100 total
 flight cycles and 16,200
 total flight hours.
A310-304, -322, -324, and -   Within 10,800 flight  Within 30,400 flight
 325 short range airplanes     cycles after the      hours after the
 on which Mod 6673S6813 is     effective date of     effective date of
 not done.                     this AD.              this AD.
A310-304, -322, -324, and -   Before the            Before the
 325 long range airplanes on   accumulation of       accumulation of
 which Mod 6673S6813 is not    8,500 total flight    42,800 total flight
 done.                         cycles.               hours.
A310-304, -322, -324, and -   Before the            Before the
 325 short range airplanes     accumulation of       accumulation of
 on which Mod 6673S6813 is     13,100 total flight   36,700 total flight
 done in production.           cycles.               hours.
A310-304, -322, -324, and -   Before the            Before the
 325 long range airplanes on   accumulation of       accumulation of
 which Mod 6673S6813 is done   10,300 total flight   51,600 total flight
 in production.                cycles.               hours.
A310-304, -322, -324, and -   Within 13,100 flight  Within 36,700 flight
 325 short range airplanes     cycles after the      hours after the
 on which Mod 6673S6813 is     effective date of     effective date of
 done in accordance with       this AD.              this AD.
 Airbus Service Bulletin
 A310-57-2035 and before the
 accumulation of 5,800 total
 flight cycles and 16,400
 total flight hours.
A310-304, -322, -324, and -   Within 7,400 flight   Within 20,900 flight
 325 short range airplanes     cycles after the      hours after the
 on which Mod 6673S6813 is     effective date of     effective date of
 done in accordance with       this AD.              this AD.
 Airbus Service Bulletin
 A310-57-2035 and not before
 the accumulation of 5,800
 total flight cycles and
 16,400 total flight hours.
A310-304, -322, -324, and -   Within 10,300 flight  Within 51,600 flight
 325 long range airplanes on   cycles after the      hours after the
 which Mod 6673S6813 is done   effective date of     effective date of
 in accordance with Airbus     this AD.              this AD.
 Service Bulletin A310-57-
 2035 and before the
 accumulation of 4,600 total
 flight cycles and 23,100
 total flight hours.
A310-304, -322, -324, and -   Within 6,000 flight   Within 30,300 flight
 325 long range airplanes on   cycles after the      hours after the
 which Mod 6673S6813 is done   effective date of     effective date of
 in accordance with Airbus     this AD.              this AD.
 Service Bulletin A310-57-
 2035 and not before the
 accumulation of 4,600 total
 flight cycles and 23,100
 total flight hours.
------------------------------------------------------------------------

                      Table 6--Repetitive Intervals
------------------------------------------------------------------------
        Model and configuration              Interval (not to exceed)
------------------------------------------------------------------------
A310-203, -204, -221, and -222           9,100 flight cycles or 18,300
 airplanes.                               flight hours, whichever occurs
                                          first.
A310-304, -322, -324, and -325 short     7,300 flight cycles or 20,400
 range airplanes.                         flight hours, whichever occurs
                                          first.
A310-304, -322, -324, and -325 long      5,900 flight cycles or 29,600
 range airplanes.                         flight hours, whichever occurs
                                          first
------------------------------------------------------------------------

     (m) For airplanes on which an inspection of the rear left and
right sides of the tee fitting has been done in accordance with
Airbus Service Bulletin A310-57-2047 as of the effective date of
this AD: At the applicable time specified in paragraphs (m)(1) or
(m)(2) of this AD, do a rotating probe inspection for any crack of
the left and right sides of the tee fitting, and do all applicable
related investigative and corrective actions, in accordance with the
Accomplishment Instructions of Airbus Service Bulletin A310-57-2047,
Revision 08, dated July 2, 2009; except as required by paragraphs
(n) and (o) of this AD. Do all applicable related investigative and
corrective actions before further flight. Repeat the inspection
thereafter at the applicable time specified in Table 6 of this AD.
Certain compliance times are applicable to short range use, AFT
equal to or less than 4 hours, or long range use, AFT exceeding 4
hours.
    (1) For A310-203, -204, -221, and -222 airplanes: At the earlier
of the times specified in paragraphs (m)(1)(i) and (m)(1)(ii) of
this AD.
    (i) Within 10,800 flight cycles or 17,400 flight hours after the
most recent inspection, whichever occurs first.
    (ii) At the later of the times specified in paragraphs
(m)(1)(ii)(A) and (m)(1)(ii)(B) of this AD.
    (A) Within the applicable interval specified in Table 6 of this
AD.
    (B) Within 700 flight cycles or 1,500 flight hours after the
effective date of this AD, whichever occurs first.
    (2) For A310-304, -322, -324, and -325 airplanes: At the later
of the times specified in paragraphs (m)(2)(i) and (m)(2)(ii) of
this AD.
    (i) Within the applicable interval specified in Table 6 of this
AD.
    (ii) Within 700 flight cycles or 1,900 flight hours after the
effective date of this AD, whichever occurs first.

Contact the FAA

    (n) Where Airbus Service Bulletin A310-57-2047, Revision 08,
dated July 2, 2009, specifies to contact the manufacturer if certain
cracks are found, before further flight, repair those conditions
according to a method approved by either the Manager, International
Branch, ANM-116, Transport Airplane Directorate, FAA; or EASA (or
its delegated agent).

No Reporting Required

    (o) Although Airbus Service Bulletin A310-57-2047, Revision 06,
dated July 13, 2004; and Revision 08, dated July 2, 2009; specify to
submit certain information to the manufacturer, this AD does not
include that requirement.
    (p) Actions accomplished before the effective date of this AD in
accordance with Airbus Mandatory Service Bulletin A310-57-2035,
Revision 09, dated September 27, 2007, are considered acceptable for
compliance with the corresponding actions specified in paragraph (g)
of this AD.
    (q) Actions accomplished before the effective date of this AD in
accordance with the service information specified in Table 7 of this
AD, are considered acceptable for compliance with the corresponding
actions specified in paragraphs (j) through (m) of this AD.

        Table 7--Previous Issues of Service Bulletin A310-57-2047
------------------------------------------------------------------------
          Document               Revision                Date
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Airbus Service Bulletin                   03  November 26, 1997.
 A310[dash]57[dash]2047.
Airbus Service Bulletin A310-             04  March 5, 1999.
 57-2047.
Airbus Service Bulletin A310-             05  August 3, 2000.
 57-2047.
Airbus Service Bulletin A310-             06  July 13, 2004.
 57-2047.
Airbus Service Bulletin A310-             07  March 14, 2008.
 57-2047.
------------------------------------------------------------------------

Related AD

    (r) Accomplishing a rotating probe inspection of the rear spar
internal angle and the tee fitting in accordance with Airbus Service
Bulletin A310-57-2047, Revision 08, dated July 2, 2009, or a service
bulletin listed in Table 7 of this AD, terminates the requirements
specified in paragraph (o) of AD 98-26-01.

FAA AD Differences

    Note 2:  This AD differs from the MCAI and/or service
information as follows:

Although the MCAI or service information tells you to contact the
manufacturer for repair information, paragraph (n) of this AD
requires that you contact the FAA or EASA (or its delegated agent)
instead. Although the MCAI or service information tells you to
submit information to the manufacturer, paragraph (o) of this AD
specifies that such submittal is not required.

Other FAA AD Provisions

    (s) The following provisions also apply to this AD:
    (1) Alternative Methods of Compliance (AMOCs): The Manager,
International Branch, ANM-116, Transport Airplane Directorate, FAA,
has the authority to approve AMOCs for this AD, if requested using
the procedures found in 14 CFR 39.19. Send information to ATTN: Dan
Rodina, Aerospace Engineer, International Branch, ANM-116, FAA,
Transport Airplane Directorate, 1601 Lind Avenue, SW., Renton,
Washington 98055-4056; telephone<PHONE_NUMBER>; fax<PHONE_NUMBER>.
Before using any approved AMOC on any airplane to which the AMOC
applies, notify your principal maintenance inspector (PMI) or
principal avionics inspector (PAI), as appropriate, or lacking a
principal inspector, your local Flight Standards District Office.
The AMOC approval letter must specifically reference this AD.
    (2) AMOCs approved previously in accordance with AD 2006-09-05,
Amendment 39-14575, are approved as AMOCs for the corresponding
provisions of this AD.
    (3) Airworthy Product: For any requirement in this AD to obtain
corrective actions from a manufacturer or other source, use these
actions if they are FAA-approved. Corrective actions are considered
FAA-approved if they are approved by the State of Design Authority
(or their delegated agent). You are required to assure the product
is airworthy before it is returned to service.

Related Information

    (t) Refer to MCAI EASA Airworthiness Directive 2008-0187, dated
October 10, 2008; and Airbus Service Bulletins A310-57-2047,
Revision 08, dated July 2, 2009; and Airbus Mandatory Service
Bulletin A310-57-2035, Revision 10, dated March 25, 2008; for
related information.

    Issued in Renton, Washington, on June 30, 2010.
Todd G. Dixon,
Acting Manager, Transport Airplane Directorate, Aircraft Certification
Service.
[FR Doc. 2010-17061 Filed 7-12-10; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910-13-P


[Federal Register: August 4, 2008 (Volume 73, Number 150)]
[Notices]
[Page 45317-45322]
[DOCID:fr04au08-96]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY

[EPA-HQ-OPP-2007-1060; FRL-8373-6]

Pesticide Inert Ingredients: Status of Revoked Tolerance
Exemptions

AGENCY: Environmental Protection Agency (EPA).

ACTION: Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: EPA is providing the status of inert ingredient tolerance
exemptions revoked in the Federal Register on August 9, 2006 (71 FR
45415) because of insufficient data.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Karen Angulo, Registration Division
(7505P), Office of Pesticide Programs, Environmental Protection Agency,
1200 Pennsylvania Ave., NW., Washington, DC 20460-0001; telephone
number:<PHONE_NUMBER>; fax number:<PHONE_NUMBER>; e-mail address:
<EMAIL_ADDRESS>
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

I. General Information

A. Does this Action Apply to Me?

    You may be potentially affected by this action if you are an
agricultural producer, food manufacturer, or pesticide manufacturer.
Potentially affected entities may include, but are not limited to:
     Crop production (NAICS code 111).
    Animal production (NAICS code 112).
    Food manufacturing (NAICS code 311).
    Pesticide manufacturing (NAICS code 32532).
    This listing is not intended to be exhaustive, but rather provides
a guide for readers regarding entities likely to be affected by this
action. Other types of entities not listed in this unit could also be
affected. The North American Industrial Classification System (NAICS)
codes have been provided to assist you and others in determining
whether this action might apply to certain entities. To determine
whether you or your business may be affected by this action, you should
carefully examine the applicability provisions in Unit II. If you have
any questions regarding the applicability of this action to a
particular entity, consult the person listed under FOR FURTHER
INFORMATION CONTACT.

B. How Can I Get Copies of this Document and Other Related Information?

    1. Docket. EPA has established a docket for this action under
docket identification (ID) number EPA-HQ-OPP-2007-1060. Publicly
available docket materials are available either in the electronic
docket at http://www.regulations.gov, or, if only available in hard
copy, at the Office of Pesticide Programs (OPP) Regulatory Public
Docket in Rm. S-4400, One Potomac Yard (South Bldg.), 2777 S. Crystal
Dr., Arlington, VA. The hours of operation of this Docket Facility are
from 8:30 a.m. to 4 p.m., Monday through Friday, excluding legal
holidays. The Docket Facility telephone number is<PHONE_NUMBER>.
    2. Electronic access. You may access this Federal Register document
electronically through the EPA Internet under the ``Federal Register''
listings at http://www.epa.gov/fedrgstr.

II. Background

A. Background on the Inert Ingredient Tolerance Exemption Revocation
Action

    In a final rule published in the Federal Register on August 9, 2006
(71 FR 45415)(FRL-8084-1), EPA revoked inert ingredient tolerance
exemptions because insufficient data were available to the Agency to
make the safety determination required by FFDCA section 408(c)(2). EPA
concluded it had insufficient data to make the safety finding of FFDCA
section 408(c)(2) and revoked the inert ingredient tolerance exemptions
identified in the final rule under 40 CFR 180.910, 180.920, 180.930,
and 180.940, with the revocations effective on August 9, 2008. This
action did not preclude the possibility that through rulemaking EPA
could reinstate those tolerance exemptions for which data are submitted
that are sufficient to support the 408(c)(2) safety finding.
    In the Federal Register of November 2, 2007, (72 FR 62232)(FRL-
8155-4), EPA published the support status of each of the revoked
tolerance exemptions. EPA had received communications from pesticide
registrants and inert ingredient manufacturers expressing interest in
supporting certain revoked inert ingredient tolerance exemptions. EPA's
guidance, available at http://www.epa.gov/opprd001/inerts/, describes
how interested parties could demonstrate support for revoked tolerance
exemptions, including identifying test materials and contracts with
laboratories.
    Elsewhere in this issue of the Federal Register is the final rule
that moves the effective date of the revocation to August 9, 2009 for
those tolerance exemptions where EPA has received a demonstration of
intent to support. No extensions are granted for revoked tolerance
exemptions where EPA has not received a demonstration of intent to
support, therefore, the revocation date for unsupported tolerance
exemptions remains August 9, 2008.

B. Effective Dates of the Revocation of Tolerance Exemptions with
Insufficient Data

    The following provides the revocation status of each of the inert
ingredient tolerance exemptions revoked because of insufficient data.
The tolerance exemptions are presented below in the order they appeared
in the final rule published in the Federal Register on August 9, 2006
(71 FR 45415). The revocation status has been added to the end of each
tolerance exemption expression. The expiration date of August 9, 2009
applies to tolerance exemption expressions with the following at the
end: ``(Demonstration of intent to support; revocation effective August
9, 2009).'' Tolerance exemption expressions with ``(No demonstration of
support; revocation effective August 9, 2008)'' expire on August 9,
2008. In addition, administrative revocation was completed in the
Federal Register on August 9, 2006 (71 FR 45415) for seven redundant
and incorrect tolerance exemptions, which are identified here as
``(Administrative revocation is complete; revoked August 9, 2006)''.
    Two other revoked tolerance exemptions received an acceptable
demonstration of support and the effective date of the revocation is
now August 9, 2009. In the Federal Register on August 9, 2006 (71 FR
45415), the Agency revoked two inert ingredient tolerance exemptions
with insufficient data under 40 CFR part 180. They were inadvertently
removed from the CFR some time ago but are considered to be active
tolerance exemptions subject to reassessment as required by the FFDCA
section 408(q). The effective date of the revocation of the following
two tolerance exemptions is now August 9, 2009:
    1. Section 180.910: ``[alpha]-Alkyl(C12-C15)-
[omega]- hydroxypoly(oxyethylene) sulfate, ammonium, calcium,
magnesium, potassium, sodium, and zinc salts; the poly(oxyethylene)
content averages 3 moles.'', and
    2. Section 180.930: ``[alpha]-Alkyl (C12-
C15)-[omega]-hydroxypoly(oxyethylene) sulfate and its
ammonium, calcium, magnesium, potassium, sodium, and zinc salts; the
poly(oxyethylene) content averages 3 moles.''

C. Unsupported Inert Ingredient Tolerance Exemptions

    It is important to note that EPA has not received indications of
intent to support many of the inert ingredient

tolerance exemptions revoked in the Federal Register on August 9, 2006
(71 FR 45415). The unsupported tolerance exemptions are identified in
the list in this Unit with ``(No demonstration of intent to support;
revocation effective August 9, 2008)'' at the end of the expression. No
time extension is granted for the revoked tolerance exemptions where
EPA has not received a demonstration of intent to support, therefore,
the expiration date for those tolerance exemptions with no indication
of intent to support remains August 9, 2008. Please note that this
revocation action only affects the use of these inert ingredients in
food-use pesticide products, therefore, any current use of these inert
ingredients in non-food use pesticide products is not affected.
    At this time, EPA is no longer accepting or processing applications
for registrations for food-use products containing a tolerance
exemption that expires on August 9, 2008 unless accompanied by a
petition for a new tolerance or exemption under the Pesticide
Registration Improvement Renewal Act (PRIA 2), together with all
necessary supporting data. All commodities containing residues of these
revoked inert ingredients on food are adulterated under FFDCA 408 if
the residues are the result of applications of pesticide products made
after August 9, 2008. Registrants who submitted a registration
application for a food-use formulation containing an inert ingredient
with an expiring tolerance exemption may submit a new application for
registration with only those inert ingredients that are approved for
the label's use sites. If the registration application is subject to,
including registration applications submitted under PRIA 2 that include
a petition for a new or amended food-use inert ingredient, the
following Web site provides useful information: http://www.epa.gov/
pesticides/fees/questions/pria21day_wrksht.pdf. Currently approved
food-use inert ingredient tolerance exemptions are found in 40 CFR part
180 (http://www.epa.gov/opprd001/inerts/lists.html). Contact EPA's
Inert Ingredient Assessment Branch at<EMAIL_ADDRESS>for
information about how to establish a new inert ingredient.

Under Sec.  180.910:

    a. [alpha]-Alkyl (C9-C18-[omega]-
hydroxypoly(oxyethylene) with poly(oxyethylene) content of 2-30 moles.
(Demonstration of intent to support; revocation effective August 9,
2009)
    b. [alpha]-(p-Alkylphenyl)-[omega]-hydroxypoly(oxyethylene)
produced by the condensation of 1 mole of alkylphenol (alkyl is a
mixture of propylene tetramer and pentamer isomers and averages
C13) with 6 moles of ethylene oxide. (No demonstration of
intent to support; revocation effective August 9, 2008)
    c. [alpha]-Alkyl (C6-C14)-[omega]-
hydroxypoly(oxypropylene) block copolymer with polyoxyethylene;
polyoxypropylene content is 1-3 moles; polyoxyethylene content is 4-12
moles; average molecular weight (in amu) is approximately 635.
(Demonstration of intent to support; revocation effective August 9,
2009)
    d. [alpha]-(p-tert-Butylphenyl)-[omega]-hydroxypoly (oxyethylene)
mixture of dihydrogen phosphate and monohydrogen phosphate esters and
the corresponding ammonium calcium, magnesium, monoethanolamine,
potassium, sodium, and zinc salts of the phosphate esters; the
poly(oxyethylene) content averages 4-12 moles. (No demonstration of
intent to support; revocation effective August 9, 2008)
    e. [alpha]-(o,p-Dinonylphenyl)-[omega]-hydroxypoly (oxyethylene)
mixture of dihydrogen phosphate and monohydrogen phosphate esters and
the corresponding ammonium, calcium, magnesium, monoethanolamine,
potassium, sodium, and zinc salts of the phosphate esters; the nonyl
group is a propylene trimer isomer and the poly(oxyethylene) content
averages 4-14 moles. (No demonstration of intent to support; revocation
effective August 9, 2008)
    f. [alpha]-(o,p-Dinonylphenyl)-[omega]-hydroxypoly (oxyethylene)
produced by condensation of 1 mole of dinonylphenol (nonyl group is a
propylene trimer isomer) with an average of 4-14 or 140-160 moles of
ethylene oxide. (No demonstration of intent to support; revocation
effective August 9, 2008)
    g. Dodecylbenzenesulfonic acid, amine salts. (No demonstration of
intent to support; revocation effective August 9, 2008)
    h. [alpha]-(p-Dodecylphenyl)-[omega]-hydroxypoly (oxyethylene)
produced by the condensation of 1 mole of dodecylphenol (dodecyl group
is a propylene tetramer isomer) with an average of 4-14 or 30-70 moles
of ethylene oxide; if a blend of products is used, the average number
of moles of ethylene oxide reacted to produce any product that is a
component of the blend shall be in the range of 4-14 or 30-70. (No
demonstration of intent to support; revocation effective August 9,
2008)
    i. Ethylene oxide adducts of 2,4,7,9-tetramethyl-5-decynediol, the
ethylene oxide content averages 3.5, 10, or 30 moles. (Demonstration of
intent to support; revocation effective August 9, 2009)
    j. [alpha]-Lauryl-[omega]-hydroxypoly(oxyethylene), average
molecular weight (in amu) of 600. (Demonstration of intent to support;
revocation effective August 9, 2009)
    k. [alpha]-Lauryl-[omega]-hydroxypoly(oxyethylene) sulfate, sodium
salt; the poly(oxyethylene) content is 3-4 moles. (Demonstration of
intent to support; revocation effective August 9, 2009)
    l. Manganous oxide. (No demonstration of intent to support;
revocation effective August 9, 2008)
    m. [alpha]-(p-Nonylphenyl)-[omega]-hydroxypoly(oxyethylene) mixture
of dihydrogen phosphate and monohydrogen phosphate esters and the
corresponding ammonium, calcium, magnesium, monoethanolamine,
potassium, sodium, and zinc salts of the phosphate esters; the nonyl
group is a propylene trimer isomer and the poly (oxyethylene) content
averages 4-14 moles or 30 moles. (Demonstration of intent to support;
revocation effective August 9, 2009)
    n. [alpha]-(p-Nonylphenyl)-[omega]-hydroxypoly(oxyethylene)
sulfate, ammonium, calcium, magnesium, potassium, sodium, and zinc
salts; the nonyl group is a propylene trimer isomer and the
poly(oxyethylene) content averages 4 moles. (Demonstration of intent to
support; revocation effective August 9, 2009)
    o. Polyglyceryl phthalate ester of coconut oil fatty acids.
(Demonstration of intent to support; revocation effective August 9,
2009)
    p. Poly(methylene-p-tert-butylphenoxy)- poly(oxyethylene) ethanol;
the poly(oxyethylene) content averages 4-12 moles. (No demonstration of
intent to support; revocation effective August 9, 2008)
    q. Poly(methylene-p-nonylphenoxy)poly(oxyethylene) ethanol; the
poly(oxyethylene) content averages 4-12 moles. (No demonstration of
intent to support; revocation effective August 9, 2008)
    r. Secondary alkyl (C11-C15)
poly(oxyethylene) acetate, sodium salt; the ethylene oxide content
averages 5 moles. (No demonstration of intent to support; revocation
effective August 9, 2008)
    s. Sodium diisobutylnaphthalenesulfonate. (Demonstration of intent
to support; revocation effective August 9, 2009)
    t. Sodium dodecylphenoxybenzenedisulfonate.

(Demonstration of intent to support; revocation effective August 9,
2009)
    u. Sodium isopropylisohexylnaphthalenesulfonate. (No demonstration
of intent to support; revocation effective August 9, 2008)
    v. Sodium lauryl glyceryl ether sulfonate. (No demonstration of
intent to support; revocation effective August 9, 2008)
    w. Sodium monoalkyl and dialkyl (C8-C16)
phenoxybenzenedisulfonate mixtures containing not less than 70% of the
monoalkylated product. (Demonstration of intent to support; revocation
effective August 9, 2009)
    x. Sodium mono- and dimethylnaphthalenesulfonates, molecular weight
(in amu) 245-260. (Demonstration of intent to support; revocation
effective August 9, 2009)
    y. Sodium mono-, di-, and tributyl naphthalenesulfonates.
(Demonstration of intent to support; revocation effective August 9,
2009)
    z. Sodium mono-, di-, and triisopropyl naphthalenesulfonate.
(Demonstration of intent to support; revocation effective August 9,
2009)
    aa. Sodium N-oleoyl-N-methyltaurine. (Demonstration of intent to
support; revocation effective August 9, 2009)
    bb. Sodium sulfite. (No demonstration of intent to support;
revocation effective August 9, 2008. The tolerance exemption under
Sec.  180.910 is revoked. Please note that EPA is currently evaluating
a petition for an exemption from the requirement of a tolerance for a
limited use of sodium sulfite as an inert ingredient. See the notice of
filing published in the Federal Register on February 6, 2008 (73 FR
6964)(FRL-8350-6)).
    cc. [alpha]-[p-(1,1,3,3-Tetramethylbutyl)phenyl]-[omega]-
hydroxypoly(oxyethylene) produced by the condensation of 1 mole of p-
(1,1,3,3-tetramethylbutyl)phenol with a range of 1-14 or 30-70 moles of
ethylene oxide: if a blend of products is used, the average range
number of moles of ethylene oxide reacted to produce any product that
is a component of the blend shall be in the range of 1-14 or 30-70.
(Demonstration of intent to support; revocation effective August 9,
2009)
    dd. [alpha]-[p-(1,1,3,3-Tetramethylbutyl) phenyl]-[omega]-
hydroxypoly(oxyethylene) produced by the condensation of 1 mole of p-
(1,1,3,3-tetramethylbutyl) phenol with an average of 4-14 or 30-70
moles of ethylene oxide; if a blend of products is used, the average
number of moles of ethylene oxide reacted to produce any product that
is a component of the blend shall be in the range of 4-14 or 30-70.
(Administrative revocation is complete; revoked August 9, 2006)
    ee. Tridecylpoly(oxyethylene) acetate, sodium salt; where the
ethylene oxide content averages 6-7 moles. (No demonstration of intent
to support; revocation effective August 9, 2008)
    In the final rule published in the Federal Register on August 9,
2006 (71 FR 45415), the Agency revoked one other inert ingredient
tolerance exemption that was inadvertently removed from the CFR some
time ago but is considered to be an active tolerance exemption under
Sec.  180.910:
    ``[alpha]-Alkyl(C12-C15)-[omega]-
hydroxypoly(oxyethylene) sulfate, ammonium, calcium, magnesium,
potassium, sodium, and zinc salts; the poly(oxyethylene) content
averages 3 moles.'' (Demonstration of intent to support; revocation
effective August 9, 2009)

Under Sec.  180.920:

    a. [alpha]-Alkyl (C12-C18)-[omega]-
hydroxypoly(oxyethylene) copolymers with poly(oxypropylene);
polyoxyethylene content averages 3-12 moles and polyoxypropylene
content 2-9 moles. (Demonstration of intent to support; revocation
effective August 9, 2009)
    b. [alpha]-Alkyl (C10-C16)-[omega]-
hydroxypoly(oxyethylene) mixture of dihydrogen phosphate and
monohydrogen phosphate esters and the corresponding ammonium, calcium,
magnesium, monoethanolamine, potassium, sodium, and zinc salts of the
phosphate esters; the poly(oxyethylene) content averages 3-20 moles.
(Demonstration of intent to support; revocation effective August 9,
2009)
    c. [alpha]-Alkyl (C12-C15)-[omega]-
hydroxypoly(oxyethylene) sulfosuccinate, isopropylamine and N-
hydroxyethyl isopropylamine salts of; the poly(oxyethylene) content
averages 3-12 moles. (No demonstration of intent to support; revocation
effective August 9, 2008)
    d. [alpha]-Alkyl(C10-12)-[omega]-
hydroxpoly(oxyethylene) poly(oxypropylene) copolymer; poly(oxyethylene)
content is 11-15 moles; poly(oxyproplene) content is 1-3 moles. (No
demonstration of intent to support; revocation effective August 9,
2008)
    e. [alpha]-Alkyl(C12-C18)-[omega]-hydroxypoly
(oxyethylene/oxypropylene) hetero polymer in which the oxyethylene
content averages 13-17 moles and the oxypropylene content averages 2-6
moles. (Demonstration of intent to support; revocation effective August
9, 2009)
    f. [alpha]-Alkyl (C10-C16)-[omega]-
hydroxypoly(oxyethylene)poly(oxypropylene) mixture of di- and
monohydrogen phosphate esters and the corresponding ammonium, calcium,
magnesium, monoethanolamine, potassium, sodium, and zinc salts of the
phosphate esters; the combined poly(oxyethylene) poly(oxypropylene)
content averages 3-20 moles. (Demonstration of intent to support;
revocation effective August 9, 2009)
    g. [alpha]-Alkyl (C12-C18)-[omega]-
hydroxypoly(oxyethylene/oxypropylene) hetero polymer in which the
oxyethylene content is 8-12 moles and the oxypropylene content is 3-7
moles. (Demonstration of intent to support; revocation effective August
9, 2009)
    h. [alpha]-Alkyl (C12-C15)-[omega]-
hydroxypoly(oxyethylene/oxypropylene) hetero polymer in which the
oxyethylene content is 8-13 moles and the oxypropylene content is 7-30
moles. (Demonstration of intent to support; revocation effective August
9, 2009)
    i. [alpha]-Alkyl (C21-C71)-[omega]-
hydroxypoly (oxyethylene) in which the poly(oxyethylene) content is 2
to 91 moles and molecular weight range from 390 to 5,000.
(Demonstration of intent to support; revocation effective August 9,
2009)
    j. n-Alkyl(C8-C18)amine acetate.
(Demonstration of intent to support; revocation effective August 9,
2009)
    k. Amine salts of alkyl (C8-C24)
benzenesulfonic acid (butylamine, dimethylaminopropylamine, mono- and
diisopropylamine, mono- , di- , and triethanolamine). (Demonstration of
intent to support; revocation effective August 9, 2009)
    l. N-(Aminoethyl) ethanolamine salt of dodecylbenzenesulfonic acid.
(No demonstration of intent to support; revocation effective August 9,
2008)
    m. N,N-Bis[[alpha]-ethyl-[omega]-hydroxypoly(oxyethylene)
alkylamine; the poly(oxyethylene) content averages 3 moles; the alkyl
groups (C14-C18) are derived from tallow, or from
soybean or cottonseed oil acids. (Demonstration of intent to support;
revocation effective August 9, 2009)
    n. N,N-Bis(2-hydroxyethyl)alkylamine, where the alkyl groups
(C8-C18) are derived from coconut, cottonseed,
soya, or tallow acids. (Demonstration of intent to support; revocation
effective August 9, 2009)
    o. N,N-Bis 2-([omega]-hydroxypolyoxyethylene) ethyl) alkylamine;
the reaction product of 1 mole N,N-bis(2-hydroxyethyl)alkylamine and 3-
60 moles of ethylene oxide, where the alkyl group (C8-
C18) is derived from coconut, cottonseed, soya, or tallow
acids.

(Demonstration of intent to support; revocation effective August 9,
2009)
    p. N,N-Bis-2-([omega]-hydroxypolyoxyethylene/polyoxypropylene)
ethyl alkylamine; the reaction product of 1 mole of N,N-bis(2-
hydroxyethyl alkylamine) and 3-60 moles of ethylene oxide and propylene
oxide, where the alkyl group (C8-C18) is derived
from coconut, cottonseed, soya, or tallow acids. (Demonstration of
intent to support; revocation effective August 9, 2009)
    q. Butoxytriethylene glycol phosphate. (No demonstration of intent
to support; revocation effective August 9, 2008)
    r. Cyclohexanol. (No demonstration of intent to support; revocation
effective August 9, 2008)
    s. [alpha]-(Di-sec-butyl)phenylpoly(oxypropylene) block polymer
with poly(oxyethylene); the poly(oxypropylene) content averages 4
moles, the poly(oxyethylene) content averages 5 to 12 moles, the
molecular. (Demonstration of intent to support; revocation effective
August 9, 2009)
    t. Disodium 4-isodecyl sulfosuccinate. (No demonstration of intent
to support; revocation effective August 9, 2008)
    u. Dodecylphenol. (No demonstration of intent to support;
revocation effective August 9, 2008)
    v. [alpha]-Dodecylphenol-[omega]-hydroxypoly(oxyethylene/
oxypropylene) hetero polymer where ethylene oxide content is 11-13
moles and oxypropylene content is 14-16 moles, molecular weight (in
amu) averages 600 to 965. (No demonstration of intent to support;
revocation effective August 9, 2008)
    w. Isopropylbenzenesulfonic acid and its ammonium, calcium,
magnesium, potassium, sodium, and zinc salts. (No demonstration of
intent to support; revocation effective August 9, 2008)
    x. (3-Lauramidopropyl) trimethylammonium methyl sulfate. (No
demonstration of intent to support; revocation effective August 9,
2008)
    y. Linoleic diethanolamide (CAS Reg. No. 56863-02-6).
(Demonstration of intent to support; revocation effective August 9,
2009)
    z. Methyl bis(2-hydroxyethyl)alkyl ammonium chloride, where the
carbon chain (C8-C18) is derived from coconut,
cottonseed, soya, or tallow acids. (Demonstration of intent to support;
revocation effective August 9, 2009)
    aa. [alpha],[alpha]'-[Methylenebis]-4-(1,1,3,3-tetramethylbutyl)-o-
phenylene bis[[omega]-hydroxypoly(oxyethylene)] having 6-7.5 moles of
ethylene oxide per hydroxyl group. (No demonstration of intent to
support; revocation effective August 9, 2008)
    bb. Methylnaphthalenesulfonic acid--formaldehyde condensate, sodium
salt. (Demonstration of intent to support; revocation effective August
9, 2009)
    cc. Methyl poly(oxyethylene) alkyl ammonium chloride, where the
poly(oxyethylene) content is 3-15 moles and the alkyl group
(C8-C18) is derived from coconut, cottonseed,
soya, or tallow acids. (Demonstration of intent to support; revocation
effective August 9, 2009)
    dd. Methyl violet 2B. (No demonstration of intent to support;
revocation effective August 9, 2008)
    ee. Morpholine salt of dodecylbenzenesulfonic acid. (No
demonstration of intent to support; revocation effective August 9,
2008)
    ff. Naphthalenesulfonic acid-formaldehyde condensate, ammonium and
sodium salts. (Demonstration of intent to support; revocation effective
August 9, 2009)
    gg. Partial sodium salt of N-lauryl-[alpha]-iminodipropionic acid.
(Demonstration of intent to support; revocation effective August 9,
2009)
    hh. Poly(methylene-p-nonylphenoxy)poly(oxypropylene) propanol; the
poly(oxy-propylene) content averages 4-12 moles. (No demonstration of
intent to support; revocation effective August 9, 2008)
    ii. Primary n-alkylamines, where the alkyl group (C8-
C18) is derived from coconut, cottonseed, soya, or tallow
acids. (Demonstration of intent to support; revocation effective August
9, 2009)
    jj. Sodium butyl naphthalenesulfonate. (Administrative revocation
is complete; revoked August 9, 2006)
    kk. Sodium 1,4-dicyclohexyl sulfosuccinate. (No demonstration of
intent to support; revocation effective August 9, 2008)
    ll. Sodium 1,4-dihexyl sulfosuccinate. (Demonstration of intent to
support; revocation effective August 9, 2009)
    mm. Sodium 1,4-diisobutyl sulfosuccinate. (Demonstration of intent
to support; revocation effective August 9, 2009)
    nn. Sodium 1,4-dipentyl sulfosuccinate. (Demonstration of intent to
support; revocation effective August 9, 2009)
    oo. Sodium 1,4-ditridecyl sulfosuccinate. (No demonstration of
intent to support; revocation effective August 9, 2008)
    pp. Sodium mono- and dimethyl naphthalenesulfonate; molecular
weight (in amu) 245-260. (Administrative revocation is complete;
revoked August 9, 2006)
    qq. Sulfosuccinic acid ester with N-(2,-hydroxy-propyl) oleamide,
ammonia and isopropylamine salts of. (No demonstration of intent to
support; revocation effective August 9, 2008)
    rr. Tall oil diesters with polypropylene glycol (CAS Reg. No.
68648-12-4). (No demonstration of intent to support; revocation
effective August 9, 2008)
    ss. N,N,N',N''-Tetrakis-(2-hydroxypropyl) ethylenediamine.
(Demonstration of intent to support; revocation effective August 9,
2009)
    tt. [alpha]-[p-(1,1,3,3-Tetramethylbutyl)phenyl]-[omega]-
hydroxypoly(oxyethylene) mixture of dihydrogen phosphate and
monohydrogen phosphate esters and the corresponding sodium salts of the
phosphate esters; the poly(oxyethylene) content averages 6 to 10 moles.
(No demonstration of intent to support; revocation effective August 9,
2008)

Under Sec.  180.930:

    a. [alpha]-Alkyl (C9-C18)-[omega]-hydroxy
poly(oxyethylene): the poly(oxyethylene) content averages 2-20 moles.
(No demonstration of intent to support; revocation effective August 9,
2008)
    b. [alpha]-Alkyl (C12-C15)-[omega]-
hydroxypoly(oxyethylene/oxypropylene) hetero polymer in which the
oxyethylene content is 8-13 moles and the oxypropylene content is 7-30
moles. (Demonstration of intent to support; revocation effective August
9, 2009)
    c. [alpha]-Alkyl (C8-C10)
hydroxypoly(oxypropylene) block polymer with polyoxyethylene;
polyoxypropylene content averages 3 moles and polyoxyethylene content
averages 5-12 moles. (Demonstration of intent to support; revocation
effective August 9, 2009)
    d. [alpha]-Alkyl (C6-C14)-[omega]-
hydroxypoly(oxypropylene) block copolymer with polyoxyethylene;
polyoxypropylene content is 1-3 moles; polyoxyethylene content is 7-9
moles; average molecular weight (in amu) approximately 635.
(Demonstration of intent to support; revocation effective August 9,
2009)
    e. [alpha]-(p-Alkylphenyl)-[omega]-hydroxypoly (oxyethylene)
produced by the condensation of 1 mole of alkylphenol (alkyl is a
mixture of propylene tetramer and pentamer isomers and averages
C13) with 6 moles of ethylene oxide. (No demonstration of
intent to support; revocation effective August 9, 2008)
    f. Amine salts of alkyl (C8-C24)
benzenesulfonic acid (butylamine; dimethylamino propylamine; mono- and
diisopropyl-amine; and mono-, di-,

and triethanolamine). (Demonstration of intent to support; revocation
effective August 9, 2009)
    g. [alpha]-(p-tert- Butylphenyl)-[omega]-hydroxypoly(oxyethylene)
mixture of dihydrogen phosphate and monohydrogen phosphate esters and
the corresponding ammonium, calcium, magnesium, monoethanolamine,
potassium, sodium, and zinc salts of the phosphate esters; the
poly(oxyethylene) content averages 4-12 moles. (No demonstration of
intent to support; revocation effective August 9, 2008)
    h. [alpha]-(o,p-Dinonylphenyl)-[omega]-hydroxypoly (oxyethylene)
mixture of dihydrogen phosphate and monohydrogen phosphate esters and
the corresponding ammonium, calcium, magnesium, monoethanolamine,
potassium, sodium, and zinc salts of the phosphate esters; the nonyl
group is a propylene trimer isomer and the poly(oxyethylene) content
averages 4-14 moles. (No demonstration of intent to support; revocation
effective August 9, 2008)
    i. [alpha]-(o,p-Dinonylphenyl)-[omega]-hydroxypoly (oxyethylene),
produced by the condensation of 1 mole of dinonylphenol (nonyl group is
a propylene trimer isomer) with an average of 4-14 moles of ethylene
oxide. (No demonstration of intent to support; revocation effective
August 9, 2008)
    j. Dodecylbenzenesulfonic acid, amine salts. (No demonstration of
intent to support; revocation effective August 9, 2008)
    k. [alpha]-(p-Dodecylphenyl)-[omega]-hydroxypoly (oxyethylene)
produced by the condensation of 1 mole of dodecylphenol (dodecyl group
is a propylene tetramer isomer) with an average of 4-14 or 30-70 moles
of ethylene oxide; if a blend of products is used, the average number
of moles of ethylene oxide reacted to produce any product that is a
component of the blend shall be in the range of 4-14 or 30-70 moles.
(No demonstration of intent to support; revocation effective August 9,
2008)
    l. Ethylene oxide adducts of 2,4,7,9-tetramethyl-5-decynediol, the
ethylene oxide content averages 3.5, 10, or 30 moles. (Demonstration of
intent to support; revocation effective August 9, 2009)
    m. Ethyl vinyl acetate (CAS Reg. No. 24937-78-8). (Administrative
revocation is complete; revoked August 9, 2006)
    n. [alpha]-Lauryl-[omega]-hydroxypoly(oxyethylene), average
molecular weight (in amu) of 600. (Demonstration of intent to support;
revocation effective August 9, 2009)
    o. [alpha]-Lauryl-[omega]-hydroxypoly(oxyethylene), sulfate, sodium
salt; the poly(oxyethylene) content is 3-4 moles. (Demonstration of
intent to support; revocation effective August 9, 2009)
    p. Manganous oxide. (No demonstration of intent to support;
revocation effective August 9, 2008)
    q. [alpha]-(Methylene (4-(1,1,3,3-tetramethylbutyl)-o-phenylene)
bis-[omega]-hydroxypoly(oxyethylene) having 6-7.5 moles of ethylene
oxide per hydroxyl group. (Administrative revocation is complete;
revoked August 9, 2006)
    r. Mono-, di-, and trimethylnaphthalenesulfonic acids-formaldehyde
condensates, sodium salts. (No demonstration of intent to support;
revocation effective August 9, 2008)
    s. Naphthalenesulfonic acid and its sodium salt. (Demonstration of
intent to support; revocation effective August 9, 2009)
    t. [alpha]-(p-Nonylphenyl)-[omega]-hydroxypoly(oxyethylene) mixture
of dihydrogen phosphate and monohydrogen phosphate esters and the
corresponding ammonium, calcium, magnesium, monoethanolamine,
potassium, sodium, and zinc salts of the phosphate esters; the nonyl
group is a propylene trimer isomer and the poly(oxyethylene) content
averages 4-14 moles. (Demonstration of intent to support; revocation
effective August 9, 2009)
    u. [alpha]-(p-Nonylphenyl)-[omega]-hydroxypoly(oxyethylene)
sulfate, and its ammonium, calcium, magnesium, potassium, sodium, and
zinc salts; the nonyl group is a propylene trimer isomer and the
poly(oxyethylene) content averages 4 moles. (Demonstration of intent to
support; revocation effective August 9, 2009)
    v. [alpha]-(p-Nonylphenyl)-[omega]-hydroxypoly(oxyethylene)
sulfate, and its ammonium, calcium, magnesium, monoethanolamine,
potassium, sodium, and zinc salts; the nonyl group is a propylene
trimer isomer and the poly(oxyethylene) content averages 4-14 or 30-90
moles of ethyiene oxide. (Demonstration of intent to support;
revocation effective August 9, 2009)
    w. Polyglyceryl phthalate esters of coconut oil fatty acids.
(Demonstration of intent to support; revocation effective August 9,
2009)
    x. Poly(methylene-p-tert-butylphenoxy)poly(oxyethylene) ethanol;
the poly(oxyethylene) content averages 4-12 moles. (No demonstration of
intent to support; revocation effective August 9, 2008)
    y. Poly(methylene-p-nonylphenoxy)poly(oxyethylene) ethanol; the
poly(oxyethylene) content averages 4-12 moles. (No demonstration of
intent to support; revocation effective August 9, 2008)
    z. Poly(methylene-p-nonylphenoxy)poly(oxypropylene) propanol; the
poly(oxypropylene) content averages 4-12 moles. (No demonstration of
intent to support; revocation effective August 9, 2008)
    aa. Secondary alkyl (C11-C15)
poly(oxyethylene) acetate, sodium salt; the ethylene oxide content
averages 5 moles. (No demonstration of intent to support; revocation
effective August 9, 2008)
    bb. Sodium butylnaphthalenesulfonate. (Administrative revocation is
complete; revoked August 9, 2006)
    cc. Sodium diisobutylnaphthalenesulfonate. (Demonstration of intent
to support; revocation effective August 9, 2009)
    dd. Sodium isopropylisohexylnaphthalenesulfonate. (No demonstration
of intent to support; revocation effective August 9, 2008)
    ee. Sodium isopropylnaphthalenesulfonate. (Demonstration of intent
to support; revocation effective August 9, 2009)
    ff. Sodium monoalkyl and diakyl (C8-C13)
phenoxybenzenedisulfonate mixtures containing not less than 70% of the
monoalkylated product. (Demonstration of intent to support; revocation
effective August 9, 2009)
    gg. Sodium mono- and dimethylnaphthalenesulfonate, molecular weight
(in amu) 245-260. (Demonstration of intent to support; revocation
effective August 9, 2009)
    hh. Sodium mono-, di-, and tributylnaphthalenesulfonates.
(Demonstration of intent to support; revocation effective August 9,
2009)
    ii. Sodium N-oleoyl-N-methyl taurine. (Demonstration of intent to
support; revocation effective August 9, 2009)
    jj. [alpha]-[p-(1,1,3,3-Tetramethylbutyl)phenyl]-[omega]-
hydroxypoly(oxyethylene) produced by the condensation of 1 mole of p
(1,1,3,3-tetramethylbutyl)phenol with a range of 1-14 or 30-70 moles of
ethylene oxide: if a blend of products is used, the average range
number of moles of ethylene oxide reacted to produce any product that
is a component of the blend shall be in the range of 1-14 or 30-70.
(Demonstration of intent to support; revocation effective August 9,
2009)
    kk. [alpha]-[p-(1,1,3,3-Tetramethylbutyl)phenyl]-[omega]-
hydroxypoly(oxyethylene) produced by the condensation of 1 mole of p-
(1,1,-3,3-tetramethylbutyl) phenol with an average of 4-14 or 30-70
moles of

ethylene oxide; if a blend of products is used, the average number of
moles of ethylene oxide reacted to produce any product that is a
component of the blend shall be in the range of 4-14 or 30-70.
(Administrative revocation is complete; revoked August 9, 2006)
    ll. Tridecylpoly(oxyethylene) acetate sodiums salt; where the
ethylene oxide content averages 6-7 moles. (No demonstration of intent
to support; revocation effective August 9, 2008)
    In the final rule published in the Federal Register on August 9,
2006 (71 FR 45415), the Agency revoked one other inert ingredient
tolerance exemption that was inadvertently removed from the CFR some
time ago but is considered to be an active tolerance exemption under
Sec.  180.930:
    ``[alpha]-Alkyl (C12-C15)-[omega]-
hydroxypoly(oxyethylene) sulfate and its ammonium, calcium, magnesium,
potassium, sodium, and zinc salts; the poly(oxyethylene) content
averages 3 moles.'' (Demonstration of intent to support; revocation
effective August 9, 2009)

Under Sec.  180.940:

    Under paragraph (a):
    i. [alpha]-Alkyl(C10-C14)-[omega]-
hydroxypoly (oxyethylene) poly(oxypropylene) average molecular weight
(in amu), 768 to 837. (Demonstration of intent to support; revocation
effective August 9, 2009)
    ii. [alpha]-Alkyl(C12-C18)-[omega]
hydroxypoly (oxyethylene) poly(oxypropylene) average molecular weight
(in amu), 950 to 1120. (Demonstration of intent to support; revocation
effective August 9, 2009)
    Under paragraph (b):
    i. [alpha]-Lauroyl-[omega]-hydroxypoly (oxyethylene) with an
average of 8-9 moles ethylene oxide, average molecular weight (in amu),
400. (No demonstration of intent to support; revocation effective
August 9, 2008)
    ii. Oxirane, methyl-, polymer with oxirane, ether with (1,2-
ethanediyldinitrilo)tetrakis [propanol] (4:1). (No demonstration of
intent to support; revocation effective August 9, 2008)
    Under paragraph (c):
    i. [alpha]-Alkyl(C10-C14)-[omega]-hydroxypoly
(oxyethylene) poly (oxypropylene) average molecular weight (in amu),
768 to 837. (Demonstration of intent to support; revocation effective
August 9, 2009)
    ii. [alpha]-Alkyl(C11-C15)-[omega]-
hydroxypoly (oxyethylene) with ethylene oxide content 9 to 13 moles.
(Demonstration of intent to support; revocation effective August 9,
2009)
    iii. [alpha]-Alkyl(C12-C15)-[omega]-
hydroxypoly (oxyethylene) polyoxypropylene, average molecular weight
(in amu), 965. (No demonstration of intent to support; revocation
effective August 9, 2008)
    iv. [alpha]-Alkyl(C12-C18)-[omega]-
hydroxypoly (oxyethylene) poly(oxypropylene) average molecular weight
(in amu), 950 to 1120. (Demonstration of intent to support; revocation
effective August 9, 2009)
    v. [alpha]-Lauroyl-[omega]-hydroxypoly (oxyethylene) with an
average of 8-9 moles ethylene oxide, average molecular weight (in amu),
400. (No demonstration of intent to support; revocation effective
August 9, 2008)
    vi. Naphthalene sulfonic acid, sodium salt. (No demonstration of
intent to support; revocation effective August 9, 2008)
    vii. Naphthalene sulfonic acid sodium salt, and its methyl,
dimethyl and trimethyl derivatives. (Demonstration of intent to
support; revocation effective August 9, 2009)
    viii. Naphthalene sulfonic acid sodium salt, and its methyl,
dimethyl and trimethyl derivatives alkylated at 3% by weight with
C6-C9 linear olefins. (Demonstration of intent to
support; revocation effective August 9, 2009)
    ix. Oxirane, methyl-, polymer with oxirane, ether with (1,2-
ethanediyldinitrilo)tetrakis [propanol] (4:1). (No demonstration of
intent to support; revocation effective August 9, 2008)

List of Subjects

    Environmental protection.

    Dated: July 22, 2008.
Lois Rossi,
Director, Registration Division, Office of Pesticide Programs.
[FR Doc. E8-17457 Filed 8-1-08; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 6560-50-S


[Federal Register Volume 83, Number 19 (Monday, January 29, 2018)]
[Notices]
[Page 4099]
[FR Doc No: 2018-01600]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

[SEC File No. 270-613, OMB Control No. 3235-0712]

Proposed Collection; Comment Request

Upon Written Request Copies Available From: Securities and Exchange
Commission, Office of FOIA Services, 100 F Street NE, Washington, DC
20549-2736.

Extension:
    Credit Risk Retention--Regulation RR.

    Notice is hereby given that, pursuant to the Paperwork Reduction
Act of 1995 (44 U.S.C. 3501 et seq.), the Securities and Exchange
Commission (``Commission'') is soliciting comments on the collection of
information summarized below. The Commission plans to submit this
existing collection of information to the Office of Management and
Budget for extension and approval.
    Credit Risk Retention (``Regulation RR'') (17 CFR 246.1 through
246.22) recordkeeping and disclosure requirements implement Section 15G
of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78o-11) Section 15G
clarifies the scope and application of Section 306(a) of the Sarbanes-
Oxley Act of 2002 (15 U.S.C. 7244(a)). Section 306(a) of the Sarbanes-
Oxley Act requires, among other things, an issuer to provide timely
notice to its directors and executive officers and to the Commission of
the imposition of a blackout period that would trigger a trading
prohibition under Section 306(a)(1) of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act. Section
306(a)(1) prohibits any director or executive officer of an issuer of
any equity security, from directly or indirectly, purchasing, selling
or otherwise acquiring or transferring any equity security of that
issuer during the blackout period with respect to such equity security,
if the director or executive officer acquired the equity security in
connection with his or her service or employment. Approximately 1,647
issuers file using Regulation RR responses and it takes approximately
14.389 hours per response. We estimate that 75% of the 14.389 hours per
response (10.792 hours) is prepared by the registrant for a total
annual reporting burden of 17,774 hours (10.792 hours per response x
1,647 responses).
    Written comments are invited on: (a) Whether this collection of
information is necessary for the proper performance of the functions of
the agency, including whether the information will have practical
utility; (b) the accuracy of the agency's estimate of the burden
imposed by the collection of information; (c) ways to enhance the
quality, utility, and clarity of the information collected; and (d)
ways to minimize the burden of the collection of information on
respondents, including through the use of automated collection
techniques or other forms of information technology. Consideration will
be given to comments and suggestions submitted in writing within 60
days of this publication.
    An agency may not conduct or sponsor, and a person is not required
to respond to, a collection of information unless it displays a
currently valid control number.
    Please direct your written comment to Pamela Dyson, Director/Chief
Information Officer, Securities and Exchange Commission, c/o Remi
Pavlik-Simon, 100 F Street NE, Washington, DC 20549 or send an email
to: [email protected].

    Dated: January 24, 2018.
Eduardo A. Aleman,
Assistant Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2018-01600 Filed 1-26-18; 8:45 am]
 BILLING CODE 8011-01-P