[Federal Register Volume 79, Number 161 (Wednesday, August 20, 2014)]
[Notices]
[Pages 49312-49313]
[FR Doc No: 2014-19772]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY

[FRL-9915-41-OW]

The National Drinking Water Advisory Council: Request for
Nominations

AGENCY: Environmental Protection Agency (EPA).

ACTION: Request for nominations.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) invites
nominations of qualified candidates to be considered for a three-year
appointment to the National Drinking Water Advisory Council (NDWAC or
Council). The 15-member Council was established by the Safe Drinking
Water Act (SDWA) to provide practical and independent advice,
consultation and recommendations to the EPA Administrator on the
activities, functions, policies and regulations required by the SDWA.
This notice solicits nominations to fill six new vacancies from
December 2014 through December 2017. To maintain the representation
required by statute, nominees will be selected to represent: State and
local agencies concerned with water hygiene and public water supply
(one vacancy); private organizations or groups demonstrating an active
interest in the field of water hygiene and public water supply--of
which two such members shall be associated with small, rural public
water systems (two vacancies); and the general public (three
vacancies).

DATES: Nominations should be submitted on or before October 6, 2014.

ADDRESSES: Submit nominations to Roy Simon, Designated Federal Officer
(DFO), The National Drinking Water Advisory Council, U.S. Environmental
Protection Agency, Office of Ground Water and Drinking Water, William
Jefferson Clinton East (Mail Code 4601-M), 1200 Pennsylvania Avenue
NW., Washington, DC 20460. You may also email nominations with the
subject line NDWACResume2014 to<EMAIL_ADDRESS>
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Email your questions to Roy Simon or
call him at<PHONE_NUMBER>.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
    National Drinking Water Advisory Council: The Council was created
by Congress on December 16, 1974, as part of the Safe Drinking Water
Act of 1974, Public Law 93-523, 42 U.S.C. 300j-5 and is operated in
accordance with the provisions of the Federal Advisory Committee Act
(FACA), 5 U.S.C. App.2. The Council consists of 15 members, including a
Chairperson, all of whom are appointed by the EPA's Administrator. Five
members represent appropriate State and local agencies concerned with
water hygiene and public water supply; five members represent private
organizations or groups demonstrating an active interest in the field
of water hygiene and public water supply--of which two such members
shall be associated with small, rural public water systems; and five
members represent the general public. The current list of members is
available

on the EPA Web site at: http://water.epa.gov/drink/ndwac/.
    The Council will meet in person once each year and may hold a
second meeting during the year either in person or by video/
teleconferencing. These meetings generally occur in the spring and
fall. Additionally, members may be asked to participate in ad hoc
workgroups to develop policy recommendations, advice letters and
reports to address specific program issues.
    Member Nominations: Any interested person and/or organization may
nominate qualified individuals for membership. The EPA values and
welcomes diversity. In an effort to obtain nominations of diverse
candidates, the agency encourages nominations of women and men of all
racial and ethnic groups.
    All nominations will be fully considered, but applicants need to be
aware of the specific representation required by the SDWA for the
current vacancies: State and local agencies concerned with water
hygiene and public water supply (one vacancy); private organizations or
groups demonstrating an active interest in the field of water hygiene
and public water supply--of which two such members shall be associated
with small, rural public water systems (two vacancies with at least one
associated with small, rural public water systems); and the general
public (three vacancies). Other criteria used to evaluate nominees will
include:
     Demonstrated experience with drinking water issues at the
national, State or local level;
     Excellent interpersonal, oral and written communication
and consensus-building skills;
     Willingness to commit time to the Council and demonstrated
ability to work constructively on committees;
     Absence of financial conflicts of interest;
     Absence of appearance of a lack of impartiality; and
     Background and experiences that would help members
contribute to the diversity of perspectives on the Council, e.g.,
geographic, economic, social, cultural, educational backgrounds,
professional affiliations and other considerations.
    Nominations must include a resume, which provides the nominee's
background, experience and educational qualifications, as well as a
brief statement (one page or less) describing the nominee's interest in
serving on the Council and addressing the other criteria previously
described. Nominees are encouraged to provide any additional
information that they feel would be useful for consideration, such as:
availability to participate as a member of the Council; how the
nominee's background, skills and experience would contribute to the
diversity of the Council; and any concerns the nominee has regarding
membership. Nominees should be identified by name, occupation,
position, current business address, email and telephone number.
Interested candidates may self-nominate. The DFO will acknowledge
receipt of nominations.
    Persons selected for membership will receive compensation for
travel and a nominal daily compensation (if appropriate) while
attending meetings. Additionally, all selected candidates will be
designated as Special Government Employees (SGEs) and will be required
to fill out the ``Confidential Financial Disclosure Form for
Environmental Protection Agency Special Government Employees'' (EPA
Form 3310-48). This confidential form provides information to the EPA
ethics officials to determine whether there is a conflict between the
SGE's public duties and their private interests, including an
appearance of a loss of impartiality as defined by Federal laws and
regulations. The form may be viewed and downloaded through the ``Ethics
Requirements for Advisors'' link on the EPA NDWAC Web site, http://water.epa.gov/drink/ndwac/fact.cfm.
    Other sources, in addition to this Federal Register notice, may
also be utilized in the solicitation of nominees. To help the EPA in
evaluating the effectiveness of its outreach efforts, please tell us
how you learned of this opportunity.

    Dated: August 12, 2014.
Peter Grevatt,
Director, Office of Ground Water and Drinking Water.
[FR Doc. 2014-19772 Filed 8-19-14; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6560-50-P


[Federal Register Volume 85, Number 163 (Friday, August 21, 2020)]
[Notices]
[Pages 51725-51726]
[FR Doc No: 2020-18329]

=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY

Coast Guard

[Docket No. USCG-2020-0486]

Merchant Marine Personnel Advisory Committee; September 2020
Teleconference

AGENCY: U.S. Coast Guard, Department of Homeland Security.

ACTION: Notice of Federal Advisory Committee teleconference meeting.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Merchant Marine Personnel Advisory Committee (Committee)
will meet via teleconference to discuss issues related to the training
and fitness of merchant marine personnel. The meeting will be open to
the public.

DATES:
    Meeting: The Merchant Marine Personnel Advisory Committee is
scheduled to meet on Tuesday, September 15, 2020, from 9 a.m. until
2:30 p.m. (EDT). The meeting may adjourn early if the Committee has
completed its business.
    Comments and supporting documentation: To ensure your comments are
received by Committee members before the teleconference, submit your
written comments no later than September 8, 2020.

ADDRESSES: To join the teleconference or to request special
accommodations, contact the individual listed in the FOR FURTHER
INFORMATION CONTACT section no later than 1 p.m. on September 8, 2020,
to obtain the needed information. The number of individuals on a
teleconference line is limited and will be available on a first-come,
first served basis.
    Instructions: You are free to submit comments at any time,
including orally at the teleconference as time permits, but if you want
Committee members to review your comments before the teleconference,
please submit your comments no later than September 8, 2020. We are
particularly interested in comments on the issues in the ``Agenda''
section below.
    We encourage you to submit comments through the Federal eRulemaking
Portal at https://www.regulations.gov. If your material cannot be
submitted using https://www.regulations.gov, call or email the person
in the FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT section of this document for
alternate instructions. You must include the docket number [USCG-2020-
0486]. Comments received will be posted without alteration at http://www.regulations.gov, including any personal information provided. For
more about privacy and submissions in response to this document, see
DHS's Correspondence System of Records notice (84 FR 48645, September
26, 2018). If you encounter technical difficulties with comment
submission, contact the individual listed in the FOR FURTHER
INFORMATION CONTACT section of this notice.
    Docket Search: Documents mentioned in this notice as being
available in the docket, and all public comments, will be in our online
docket at https://www.regulations.gov and can be viewed by following
that website's instructions. Additionally, if you go to the online
docket and sign up for email alerts, you will be notified when comments
are posted.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Ms. Megan Johns Henry, Alternate
Designated Federal Officer of the Merchant Marine Personnel Advisory

Committee, 2703 Martin Luther King Jr. Ave. SE, Stop 7509, Washington,
DC 20593-7509, telephone<PHONE_NUMBER>, or<EMAIL_ADDRESS>
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Notice of this meeting is in compliance with
the Federal Advisory Committee Act, 5 U.S.C. Appendix.
    The Merchant Marine Personnel Advisory Committee is established
under authority of U.S. Code, Title 46, section 8108. The Committee
acts solely in an advisory capacity to the Secretary of the Department
of Homeland Security through the Commandant of the U.S. Coast Guard on
matters relating to personnel in the United States merchant marine,
including training, qualifications, certification, documentation, and
fitness standards and other matters as assigned by the Commandant. The
Committee also reviews and comments on proposed U.S. Coast Guard
regulations and policies relating to personnel in the United States
merchant marine, including training, qualifications, certification,
documentation, and fitness standards.

Agenda

    The agenda for the September 15, 2020 full Committee meeting is as
follows:
    (1) Introduction.
    (2) Designated Federal Officer remarks.
    (3) Remarks from U.S. Coast Guard Leadership.
    (4) Roll call of Committee members and determination of a quorum.
    (5) Acceptance of Meeting 51 Minutes.
    (6) Report on Working Groups and Discussion of Working Group
recommendations.
    The Committee will review the information presented on each issue,
deliberate on any recommendations presented by the Working Groups,
approve/formulate recommendations and close any completed tasks.
Official action on these recommendations may be taken:
    (a) Task Statement 90, Review of IMO Model Courses Being Validated
by the IMO HTW Subcommittee;
    (b) Task Statement 94, MERPAC Recommendation Review;
    (c) Task Statement 101, Communication Between External Stakeholders
and the Mariner Credentialing Program;
    (d) Task Statement 105, Military Education, Training and Assessment
for STCW and National Mariner Endorsements;
    (e) Task Statement 106, STCW Convention and Code Review;
    (f) Task Statement 107, Review of NOAA Sunsetting Program of Paper
Nautical Chart Production.
    (7) Report on establishment of National Merchant Marine Personnel
Advisory Committee
    (8) Report on National Maritime Center.
    (9) Report on Job Task Analysis.
    (10) Public comment period.
    (11) Member recognition.
    (12) Closing remarks.
    (13) Adjournment of meeting.
    A copy of all meeting documentation will be available at https://homeport.uscg.mil/missions/ports-and-waterways/safety-advisory-committees/merpac no later than September 8, 2020. Alternatively, you
may contact Ms. Megan Johns Henry as noted in the FOR FURTHER
INFORMATION CONTACT section above.
    During the September 15, 2020 teleconference, a public comment
period will be held from approximately 1:30-1:45 p.m. (EDT). Public
comments will be limited to two minutes per speaker. Please note that
the public comment periods will end following the last call for
comments. Please contact the individual listed in the FOR FURTHER
INFORMATION CONTACT section, to register as a speaker.

    Dated: August 17, 2020.
Jeffrey G. Lantz,
Director of Commercial Regulations and Standards.
[FR Doc. 2020-18329 Filed 8-20-20; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 9110-04-P


[Federal Register Volume 88, Number 145 (Monday, July 31, 2023)]
[Proposed Rules]
[Pages 49361-49364]
[FR Doc No: 2023-15910]

=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION

Federal Aviation Administration

14 CFR Part 39

[Docket No. FAA-2023-1637; Project Identifier MCAI-2023-00184-E]
RIN 2120-AA64

Airworthiness Directives; Rolls-Royce Deutschland Ltd & Co KG
Engines

AGENCY: Federal Aviation Administration (FAA), DOT.

ACTION: Notice of proposed rulemaking (NPRM).

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The FAA proposes to adopt a new airworthiness directive (AD)
for all Rolls-Royce Deutschland Ltd & Co KG (RRD) Model Trent 1000-A2,
Trent 1000-AE2, Trent 1000-C2, Trent 1000-CE2, Trent 1000-D2, Trent
1000-E2, Trent 1000-G2, Trent 1000-H2, Trent 1000-J2, Trent 1000-K2,
and Trent 1000-L2 engines. This proposed AD was prompted by reports of
cracking and separation of certain low-pressure turbine (LPT) stage 1
blade assemblies. This proposed AD would require initial and repetitive
inspections of affected LPT stage 1 blade assemblies for cracking or
separation and, depending on the results of the inspections, reduction
of the inspection interval or replacement of the LPT stage 1 blade set
and disk, as specified in a European Union Aviation Safety Agency
(EASA) AD, which is proposed for incorporation by reference (IBR). The
FAA is proposing this AD to address the unsafe condition on these
products.

DATES: The FAA must receive comments on this NPRM by September 14,
2023.

ADDRESSES: You may send comments, using the procedures found in 14 CFR
11.43 and 11.45, by any of the following methods:
     Federal eRulemaking Portal: Go to regulations.gov. Follow
the instructions for submitting comments.
     Fax:<PHONE_NUMBER>.
     Mail: U.S. Department of Transportation, Docket
Operations, M-30, West Building Ground Floor, Room W12-140, 1200 New
Jersey Avenue SE, Washington, DC 20590.
     Hand Delivery: Deliver to Mail address above between 9
a.m. and 5 p.m., Monday through Friday, except Federal holidays.
    AD Docket: You may examine the AD docket at regulations.gov under
Docket No. FAA-2023-1637; or in person at Docket Operations between 9
a.m. and 5 p.m., Monday through Friday, except Federal holidays. The AD
docket contains this NPRM, the mandatory

continuing airworthiness information (MCAI), any comments received, and
other information. The street address for Docket Operations is listed
above.
    Material Incorporated by Reference:
     For EASA service information material identified in this
NPRM, contact EASA, Konrad-Adenauer-Ufer 3, 50668 Cologne, Germany;
phone: +49 221 8999 000; email: [email protected]; website:
easa.europa.eu. You may find this material on the EASA website at
ad.easa.europa.eu.
     You may view this service information at the FAA,
Airworthiness Products Section, Operational Safety Branch, 1200
District Avenue, Burlington, MA 01803. For information on the
availability of this material at the FAA, call<PHONE_NUMBER>.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Sungmo Cho, Aviation Safety Engineer,
FAA, 2200 South 216th Street, Des Moines, WA 98198; phone: (781) 238-
7241; email: [email protected].

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

Comments Invited

    The FAA invites you to send any written relevant data, views, or
arguments about this proposal. Send your comments to an address listed
under ADDRESSES. Include ``Docket No. FAA-2023-1637; Project Identifier
MCAI-2023-00184-E'' at the beginning of your comments. The most helpful
comments reference a specific portion of the proposal, explain the
reason for any recommended change, and include supporting data. The FAA
will consider all comments received by the closing date and may amend
this proposal because of those comments.
    Except for Confidential Business Information (CBI) as described in
the following paragraph, and other information as described in 14 CFR
11.35, the FAA will post all comments received, without change, to
regulations.gov, including any personal information you provide. The
agency will also post a report summarizing each substantive verbal
contact received about this NPRM.

Confidential Business Information

    CBI is commercial or financial information that is both customarily
and actually treated as private by its owner. Under the Freedom of
Information Act (FOIA) (5 U.S.C. 552), CBI is exempt from public
disclosure. If your comments responsive to this NPRM contain commercial
or financial information that is customarily treated as private, that
you actually treat as private, and that is relevant or responsive to
this NPRM, it is important that you clearly designate the submitted
comments as CBI. Please mark each page of your submission containing
CBI as ``PROPIN.'' The FAA will treat such marked submissions as
confidential under the FOIA, and they will not be placed in the public
docket of this NPRM. Submissions containing CBI should be sent to
Sungmo Cho, Aviation Safety Engineer, FAA, 2200 South 216th Street, Des
Moines, WA 98198. Any commentary that the FAA receives which is not
specifically designated as CBI will be placed in the public docket for
this rulemaking.

Background

    EASA, which is the Technical Agent for the Member States of the
European Union, has issued EASA AD 2023-0027, dated January 31, 2023
(EASA AD 2023-0027) (referred to after this as the MCAI), to address an
unsafe condition for all RRD Model Trent 1000-A2, Trent 1000-AE2, Trent
1000-C2, Trent 1000-CE2, Trent 1000-D2, Trent 1000-E2, Trent 1000-G2,
Trent 1000-H2, Trent 1000-J2, Trent 1000-K2 and Trent 1000-L2 engines.
The MCAI states that manufacturer inspections detected cracking and
separation of blade pairs in the weld region of certain LPT stage 1
blade assemblies. A blade assembly consists of a pair of blades welded
together at the outer shroud. There are 85 LPT stage 1 blade assemblies
in one set. Such cracking and separation could cause failure of
affected parts and damage to the LPT module.
    You may examine the MCAI in the AD docket at regulations.gov under
Docket No. FAA-2023-1637.

Related Service Information Under 1 CFR Part 51

    The FAA reviewed EASA AD 2023-0027, which specifies procedures for
inspection of affected LPT stage 1 blade assemblies and replacement of
the LPT stage 1 blade set and disk. EASA AD 2023-0027 also specifies a
reduction of the repetitive inspection intervals if cracking or
separation is detected and meets certain criteria. This material is
reasonably available because the interested parties have access to it
through their normal course of business or by the means identified in
ADDRESSES.

FAA's Determination

    These products have been approved by the aviation authority of
another country and are approved for operation in the United States.
Pursuant to the FAA's bilateral agreement with this State of Design
Authority, it has notified the FAA of the unsafe condition described in
the MCAI described above. The FAA is issuing this NPRM after
determining that the unsafe condition described previously is likely to
exist or develop on other products of the same type design.

Proposed AD Requirements in This NPRM

    This proposed AD would require accomplishing the actions specified
in the MCAI described previously, except for any differences identified
as exceptions in the regulatory text of this proposed.

Explanation of Required Compliance Information

    In the FAA's ongoing efforts to improve the efficiency of the AD
process, the FAA developed a process to use some civil aviation
authority (CAA) ADs as the primary source of information for compliance
with requirements for corresponding FAA ADs. The FAA has since
coordinated with other manufacturers and CAAs to use this process. As a
result, the FAA proposes to incorporate by reference EASA AD 2023-0027
in the FAA final rule. This proposed AD would, therefore, require
compliance with EASA AD 2023-0027 in its entirety through that
incorporation, except for any differences identified as exceptions in
the regulatory text of this proposed AD. Using common terms that are
the same as the heading of a particular section in the EASA AD does not
mean that operators need comply only with that section. For example,
where the AD requirement refers to ``all required actions within the
compliance times,'' compliance with this AD requirement is not limited
to the section titled ``Required Action(s) and Compliance Time(s)'' in
EASA AD 2023-0027. Service information required by the EASA AD for
compliance will be available at regulations.gov by searching for and
locating Docket No. FAA-2023-1637 after the FAA final rule is
published.

Costs of Compliance

    The FAA estimates that this AD, if adopted as proposed, would
affect 26 engines installed on airplanes of U.S. Registry.
    The FAA estimates the following costs to comply with this proposed
AD:

                                                 Estimated Costs
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
                                                                                Cost per       Cost on U.S.
               Action                        Labor cost           Parts cost        product         operators
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Inspect LPT stage 1 blade assemblies  4 work-hours x $85 per               $0             $340           $8,840
                                       hour = $340.
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

    The FAA estimates the following costs to do any necessary
replacements that would be required based on the results of the
proposed inspection. The agency has no way of determining the number of
aircraft that might need these replacements:

                                               On-Condition Costs
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
                                                                                Cost per
                    Action                                Labor cost               Parts cost        product
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Replace LPT stage 1 blade set and disk.......  4 work-hours x $85 per hour =          $720,000         $720,340
                                                $340.
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Authority for This Rulemaking

    Title 49 of the United States Code specifies the FAA's authority to
issue rules on aviation safety. Subtitle I, section 106, describes the
authority of the FAA Administrator. Subtitle VII: Aviation Programs,
describes in more detail the scope of the Agency's authority.
    The FAA is issuing this rulemaking under the authority described in
Subtitle VII, Part A, Subpart III, Section 44701: General requirements.
Under that section, Congress charges the FAA with promoting safe flight
of civil aircraft in air commerce by prescribing regulations for
practices, methods, and procedures the Administrator finds necessary
for safety in air commerce. This regulation is within the scope of that
authority because it addresses an unsafe condition that is likely to
exist or develop on products identified in this rulemaking action.

Regulatory Findings

    The FAA determined that this proposed AD would not have federalism
implications under Executive Order 13132. This proposed AD would not
have a substantial direct effect on the States, on the relationship
between the national government and the States, or on the distribution
of power and responsibilities among the various levels of government.
    For the reasons discussed above, I certify this proposed
regulation:
    (1) Is not a ``significant regulatory action'' under Executive
Order 12866,
    (2) Would not affect intrastate aviation in Alaska, and
    (3) Would not have a significant economic impact, positive or
negative, on a substantial number of small entities under the criteria
of the Regulatory Flexibility Act.

List of Subjects in 14 CFR Part 39

    Air transportation, Aircraft, Aviation safety, Incorporation by
reference, Safety.

The Proposed Amendment

    Accordingly, under the authority delegated to me by the
Administrator, the FAA proposes to amend 14 CFR part 39 as follows:

PART 39--AIRWORTHINESS DIRECTIVES

0
1. The authority citation for part 39 continues to read as follows:

    Authority:  49 U.S.C. 106(g), 40113, 44701.

Sec.  39.13  [Amended]

0
2. The FAA amends Sec.  39.13 by adding the following new airworthiness
directive:

Rolls-Royce Deutschland Ltd. & Co. KG: Docket No. FAA-2023-1637;
Project Identifier MCAI-2023-00184-E.

(a) Comments Due Date

    The FAA must receive comments on this airworthiness directive
(AD) by September 14, 2023.

(b) Affected ADs

    None.

(c) Applicability

    This AD applies to Rolls-Royce Deutschland Ltd & Co KG (RRD)
Model Trent 1000-A2, Trent 1000-AE2, Trent 1000-C2, Trent 1000-CE2,
Trent 1000-D2, Trent 1000-E2, Trent 1000-G2, Trent 1000-H2, Trent
1000-J2, Trent 1000-K2, and Trent 1000-L2 engines.

(d) Subject

    Joint Aircraft Service Component (JASC) Code 7250, Turbine
Section.

(e) Unsafe Condition

    This AD was prompted by reports of cracking and separation of
certain low-pressure turbine (LPT) stage 1 blade assemblies. The FAA
is issuing this AD to prevent failure of the LPT stage 1 blades. The
unsafe condition, if not addressed, could result in high energy
debris release, damage to the airplane, and reduced control of the
airplane.

(f) Compliance

    Comply with this AD within the compliance times specified,
unless already done.

(g) Required Actions

    Except as specified in paragraphs (h) and (i) of this AD:
Perform all required actions within the compliance times specified
in, and in accordance with, European Union Aviation Safety Agency AD
2023-0027, dated January 31, 2023 (EASA AD 2023-0027).

(h) Exceptions to EASA AD 2023-0027

    (1) Where EASA AD 2023-0027 specifies compliance from its
effective date, this AD requires using the effective date of this
AD.
    (2) This AD does not adopt the Remarks paragraph of EASA AD
2023-0027.
    (3) Where the service information referenced in EASA AD 2023-
0027 specifies discarding the removed LP turbine stage 1 blade set,
this AD requires removing the affected part from service.
    (4) Where the service information referenced in EASA AD 2023-
0027 specifies to quarantine the removed LP turbine stage 1 rotor
disc, this AD requires removing the affected part from service.

 (i) No Reporting Requirement

    Although the service information referenced in EASA AD 2023-0027
specifies to submit certain information to the manufacturer, this AD
does not include that requirement.

(j) Alternative Methods of Compliance (AMOCs)

    (1) The Manager, AIR-520, Continued Operational Safety Branch,
FAA, has the authority to approve AMOCs for this AD, if requested
using the procedures found in 14 CFR 39.19. In accordance with 14
CFR 39.19, send your request to your principal inspector or local
Flight Standards District Office, as appropriate. If sending
information directly to the manager of the branch office, send it to
the attention of the person identified in

paragraph (k) of this AD and email to: [email protected].
    (2) Before using any approved AMOC, notify your appropriate
principal inspector, or lacking a principal inspector, the manager
of the local flight standards district office/certificate holding
district office.

(k) Additional Information

    For more information about this AD, contact Sungmo Cho, Aviation
Safety Engineer, FAA, 2200 South 216th Street, Des Moines, WA 98198;
phone:<PHONE_NUMBER>; email: [email protected].

(l) Material Incorporated by Reference

    (1) The Director of the Federal Register approved the
incorporation by reference (IBR) of the service information listed
in this paragraph under 5 U.S.C. 552(a) and 1 CFR part 51.
    (2) You must use this service information as applicable to do
the actions required by this AD, unless this AD specifies otherwise.
    (i) European Union Aviation Safety Agency AD 2023-0027, dated
January 31, 2023.
    (ii) [Reserved]
    (3) For EASA AD 2023-0027, contact EASA, Konrad-Adenauer-Ufer 3,
50668 Cologne, Germany; phone: +49 221 8999 000; email:
[email protected]; website: easa.europa.eu. You may find this EASA
AD on the EASA website at ad.easa.europa.eu.
    (4) You may view this service information at the FAA,
Airworthiness Products Section, Operational Safety Branch, 1200
District Avenue, Burlington, MA 01803. For information on the
availability of this material at the FAA, call<PHONE_NUMBER>.
    (5) You may view this service information that is incorporated
by reference at the National Archives and Records Administration
(NARA). For information on the availability of this material at
NARA, email [email protected], or go to: www.archives.gov/federal-register/cfr/ibr-locations.html.

    Issued on July 21, 2023.
Victor Wicklund,
Deputy Director, Compliance & Airworthiness Division, Aircraft
Certification Service.
[FR Doc. 2023-15910 Filed 7-28-23; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910-13-P


[Federal Register Volume 77, Number 86 (Thursday, May 3, 2012)]
[Notices]
[Pages 26288-26289]
[FR Doc No: 2012-10716]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES

Food and Drug Administration

[Docket No. FDA-2011-E-0156]

Determination of Regulatory Review Period for Purposes of Patent
Extension; HALAVEN

AGENCY: Food and Drug Administration, HHS.

ACTION: Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Food and Drug Administration (FDA) has determined the
regulatory review period for HALAVEN and is publishing this notice of
that determination as required by law. FDA has made the determination
because of the submission of an application to the Director of Patents
and Trademarks, Department of Commerce, for the extension of a patent
which claims that human drug product.

ADDRESSES: Submit electronic comments to http://www.regulations.gov.
Submit written petitions along with three copies and written comments
to the Division of Dockets Management (HFA-305), Food and Drug
Administration, 5630 Fishers Lane, Rm. 1061, Rockville, MD 20852.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Beverly Friedman, Office of Regulatory
Policy, Food and Drug Administration, 10903 New Hampshire Ave., Bldg.
51, Rm. 6284, Silver Spring, MD 20993-0002,<PHONE_NUMBER>.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The Drug Price Competition and Patent Term
Restoration Act of 1984 (Public Law 98-417) and the Generic Animal Drug
and Patent Term Restoration Act (Public Law 100-670) generally provide
that a patent may be extended for a period of up to 5 years so long as
the patented item (human drug product, animal drug product, medical
device, food additive, or color additive) was subject to regulatory
review by FDA before the item was marketed. Under these acts, a
product's regulatory review period forms the basis for determining the
amount of extension an applicant may receive.
    A regulatory review period consists of two periods of time: A
testing phase and an approval phase. For human drug products, the
testing phase begins when the exemption to permit the clinical
investigations of the drug becomes effective and runs until the
approval phase begins. The approval phase starts with the initial
submission of an application to market the human drug product and
continues until FDA grants permission to market the drug product.

Although only a portion of a regulatory review period may count toward
the actual amount of extension that the Director of Patents and
Trademarks may award (for example, half the testing phase must be
subtracted as well as any time that may have occurred before the patent
was issued), FDA's determination of the length of a regulatory review
period for a human drug product will include all of the testing phase
and approval phase as specified in 35 U.S.C. 156(g)(1)(B).
    FDA recently approved for marketing the human drug product HALAVEN
(eribulin mesylate). HALAVEN is indicated for the treatment of patients
with metastatic breast cancer who have previously received at least two
chemotherapeutic regimens for the treatment of metastatic disease.
Subsequent to this approval, the Patent and Trademark Office received a
patent term restoration application for HALAVEN (U.S. Patent No.
6,214,865) from Eisai R&D Management Co., Ltd., and the Patent and
Trademark Office requested FDA's assistance in determining this
patent's eligibility for patent term restoration. In a letter dated
April 26, 2011, FDA advised the Patent and Trademark Office that this
human drug product had undergone a regulatory review period and that
the approval of HALAVEN represented the first permitted commercial
marketing or use of the product. Thereafter, the Patent and Trademark
Office requested that FDA determine the product's regulatory review
period.
    FDA has determined that the applicable regulatory review period for
HALAVEN is 2,758 days. Of this time, 2,527 days occurred during the
testing phase of the regulatory review period, while 231 days occurred
during the approval phase. These periods of time were derived from the
following dates:
    1. The date an exemption under section 505(i) of the Federal Food,
Drug, and Cosmetic Act (the FD&C Act) (21 U.S.C. 355(i)) became
effective: April 30, 2003. FDA has verified the applicant's claim that
the date the investigational new drug application became effective was
on April 30, 2003.
    2. The date the application was initially submitted with respect to
the human drug product under section 505(b) of the FD&C Act: March 30,
2010. FDA has verified the applicant's claim that the new drug
application (NDA) for HALAVEN (NDA 201-532) was submitted on March 30,
2010.
    3. The date the application was approved: November 15, 2010. FDA
has verified the applicant's claim that NDA 201-532 was approved on
November 15, 2010.
    This determination of the regulatory review period establishes the
maximum potential length of a patent extension. However, the U.S.
Patent and Trademark Office applies several statutory limitations in
its calculations of the actual period for patent extension. In its
application for patent extension, this applicant seeks 1,495 days of
patent term extension.
    Anyone with knowledge that any of the dates as published are
incorrect may submit to the Division of Dockets Management (see
ADDRESSES) either electronic or written comments and ask for a
redetermination by July 2, 2012. Furthermore, any interested person may
petition FDA for a determination regarding whether the applicant for
extension acted with due diligence during the regulatory review period
by October 30, 2012. To meet its burden, the petition must contain
sufficient facts to merit an FDA investigation. (See H. Rept. 857, part
1, 98th Cong., 2d sess., pp. 41-42, 1984.) Petitions should be in the
format specified in 21 CFR 10.30.
    Interested persons may submit to the Division of Dockets Management
(see ADDRESSES) electronic or written comments and written petitions.
It is only necessary to send one set of comments. However, if you
submit a written petition, you must submit three copies of the
petition. Identify comments with the docket number found in brackets in
the heading of this document.
    Comments and petitions that have not been made publicly available
on http://www.regulations.gov may be viewed in the Division of Dockets
Management between 9 a.m. and 4 p.m., Monday through Friday.

    Dated: April 16, 2012.
Jane A. Axelrad,
Associate Director for Policy, Center for Drug Evaluation and Research.
[FR Doc. 2012-10716 Filed 5-2-12; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4160-01-P


[Federal Register Volume 81, Number 41 (Wednesday, March 2, 2016)]
[Notices]
[Pages 10933-10935]
[FR Doc No: 2016-04502]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

[Release No. 34-77232; File No. SR-NASDAQ-2016-026]

Self-Regulatory Organizations; The NASDAQ Stock Market LLC;
Notice of Filing and Immediate Effectiveness of Proposed Rule Change To
Amend Rule 5745

February 25, 2016.
    Pursuant to Section 19(b)(1) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934
(``Act''),\1\ and Rule 19b-4 thereunder,\2\ notice is hereby given that
on February 17, 2016, The NASDAQ Stock Market LLC (``Nasdaq'' or the
``Exchange'') filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission
(``Commission'') the proposed rule change as described in in Items I
and II below, which Items have been prepared by Nasdaq. The Commission
is publishing this notice to solicit comments on the proposed rule
change from interested persons.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \1\ 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(1).
    \2\ 17 CFR 240.19b-4.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

I. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement of the Terms of Substance
of the Proposed Rule Change

    Pursuant to the provisions of Section 19(b)(1) of the Act, and Rule
19b-4 thereunder, Nasdaq is filing with the Commission a proposed rule
change to amend Nasdaq Rule 5745 (Exchange-Traded Managed Fund
(``NextShares'')) in connection with a type of open-end management
investment company registered under the Investment Company Act of 1940,
as amended (``1940 Act''). The shares of a NextShares are collectively
referred to herein as ``Shares.''
    The text of the proposed rule change is available at http://nasdaq.cchwallstreet.com/, at Nasdaq's principal office, and at the
Commission's Public Reference Room.

II. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement of the Purpose of, and
Statutory Basis for, the Proposed Rule Change

    In its filing with the Commission, the Exchange included statements
concerning the purpose of and basis for the proposed rule change and
discussed any comments it received on the proposed rule change. The
text of these statements may be examined at the places specified in
Item IV below. The Exchange has prepared summaries, set forth in
sections A, B, and C below, of the most significant aspects of such
statements.

A. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement of the Purpose of, and
Statutory Basis for, the Proposed Rule Change

1. Purpose
    The Exchange proposes to amend Nasdaq Rule 5745 in connection with
the trading of NextShares \3\ on Nasdaq using a new trading protocol
called ``NAV-Based Trading.'' In NAV-Based Trading, all bids, offers
and execution prices would be expressed as a premium/discount (which
may be zero) to a NextShares next-determined net asset value (``NAV'')
(e.g., NAV - $0.01;

NAV + $0.01). A NextShares NAV would be determined each business day,
normally no later than 6:45 p.m. Eastern Time. Trade executions using
NAV-Based Trading would be binding at the time orders are matched on
Nasdaq's facilities, with the transaction prices contingent upon the
determination of the NextShares NAV at the end of the business day.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \3\ The Commission approved Nasdaq Rule 5745 in Securities
Exchange Act Release No. 34-73562 (Nov. 7, 2014), 79 FR 68309 (Nov.
14, 2014) (SR-NASDAQ-2014-020).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    A NextShares next determined NAV would be represented by a proxy
price (``Proxy Price'') base value (represented as 100) and will be
adjusted by the premium/discount being offered/bid by the subject
transaction. For example, if a client wanted to enter a bid of NAV
minus $0.01 the proxy price would be 99.99 and if a client wanted to
enter an offer of NAV plus $0.02 the proxy price would be 100.02.
    Specifically, the Exchange proposes to amend Nasdaq Rule 5745
(Exchange-Traded Managed Fund (``NextShares'')) to add new subsection
(h) to Nasdaq Rule 5745, which defines ``Proxy Price Protection''.
Proxy Price Protection states that every NextShares order is subject to
the Proxy Price Protection threshold of plus/minus $1.00 and that this
threshold determines both the lower and upper threshold whereby orders
will be cancelled at any point if it exceeds $101.00 or falls below
$99.00, the established thresholds. The Proxy Price Protection
threshold is applied to the proxy price amount of $100.00, which is the
proxy price that reflects the NAV of a NextShares Fund.
    Every NextShares order, regardless of buying or selling
instructions and order type, will be subject to the Proxy Price
Protection threshold of plus/minus $1.00 and will be applied uniformly
across all NextShares products. A NextShares order that is subject to
the Proxy Price Protection threshold of plus/minus $1.00 will be
cancelled at any point if it exceeds or falls below the established
thresholds (i.e., if the NextShares order falls below $99.00 or exceeds
$101.00). Additionally, the Proxy Price Protection threshold of plus/
minus $1.00 will be monitored to measure its effectiveness, but it may
be adjusted by the Exchange in the future if it determines based upon
feedback and investor experience that a different threshold would be
more effective.
    Nasdaq based the Proxy Price Protection threshold of plus/minus
$1.00 on how NextShares transactions occur in relation to the NAV.
Since each trade executes in Proxy Price format, only the amount of
premium/discount can be determined at the time of the transaction. This
premium/discount from each transaction will then be applied to the end
of day NAV to calculate a final transaction price. The Proxy Price
Protection threshold of plus/minus of $1.00 is to ensure that the
amount of the premium/discount does not represent a disproportionate
amount of the total transaction when applied to the end of day NAV. The
Proxy Price Protection threshold, however, will not be adjusted in the
future to be less than $1.00 or exceed $3.00.
    In the example below, the plus/minus $1.00 threshold would
translate into a 4% change in NAV for the Large Cap NextShares given
the $25.00 end of day NAV. This 4% change in NAV is narrower, but most
closely aligns with the 5% change in NAV set forth in Nasdaq Rule 11890
for clearly erroneous transactions for products with an NAV greater
than $25.00 up to and including $50.00,\4\ which is the expected NAV
range for many NextShares.\5\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \4\ See Nasdaq Rule 11890(a)(2)(C)(1).
    \5\ The Exchange notes that the proposed Proxy Price Protection
threshold of plus/minus $1.00 is also expected to be narrower than
the applicable limit up--limit down plan bands. With the
introduction of a new trading process (trading in Proxy Price), the
Exchange seeks to offer protections that are more narrow than limit
up--limit down bands given that the trading process represents a
premium or discount to the end of day NAV price.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    To illustrate whether a subject transaction meets the plus/minus
$1.00 Proxy Price Protection threshold, consider the following example
for a Large Cap NextShares \6\ with a $25.00 end of day NAV:
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \6\ Large Cap NextShares is used only for illustrative purposes
and this example applies across all NextShares (i.e., this example
applies exactly the same to any type of NextShares such as a Small
Cap NextShares or a Government Obligations NextShares) and does not
apply on a security by security basis.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

     The plus/minus $1.00 Proxy Price Protection threshold is
applied to the proxy price amount of $100.00, which is the proxy price
that reflects the NAV of a NextShares Fund
     The lower threshold will be $99.00
     The upper threshold will be $101.00
     Buy or Sell orders lower than $99.00 or greater than
$101.00 will not be accepted
    When applied to the end of day NAV \7\ of $25.00, the example
continues as follows:
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \7\ Nasdaq will apply the premium or discount from the
transaction done in Proxy Price to the end of day NAV resulting in a
final transaction price inclusive of the premium or discount.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

     The minimum execution price will be $24.00
     The maximum execution price will be $26.00
2. Statutory Basis
    Nasdaq believes that the proposal is consistent with Section 6(b)
of the Act \8\ in general and Section 6(b)(5) of the Act \9\ in
particular in that it is designed to prevent fraudulent and
manipulative acts and practices, to promote just and equitable
principles of trade, to foster cooperation and coordination with
persons engaged in facilitating transactions in securities, and to
remove impediments to and perfect the mechanism of a free and open
market and a national market system.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \8\ 15 U.S.C. 78f(b).
    \9\ 15 U.S.C. 78f(b)(5).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    The Exchange believes that proposed new subsection (h) to Nasdaq
Rule 5745 is designed to promote just and equitable principles of trade
and to protect investors in the trading of NextShares by clarifying
that NextShares orders that fall outside the Proxy Price Protection
threshold of plus/minus $1.00 will be cancelled, as well as by
explicitly stating that this threshold is applied to the proxy price
amount of $100.00, which is the proxy price that reflects the NAV of a
NextShares Fund. The Exchange believes that that the proposed rule
change to implement a Proxy Price Protection threshold is similar to
existing mechanisms on other markets \10\ and would reduce the risk of
and potentially prevent the execution of orders that are potentially
erroneous from occurring on the Exchange. The proposed rule change will
reduce confusion and add clarity around this issue and thereby promote
just and equitable principles of trade and protect investors.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \10\ See Securities Exchange Act Release No. 74063 (Jan. 15,
2015), 80 FR 3269 (Jan. 22, 2015) (SR-NYSE-2015-01) (Notice of
Filing and Immediate Effectiveness of Proposed Rule Change to Add a
Price Protection Mechanism to Prevent the Automatic Execution of
Incoming Market Orders and Marketable Limit Orders Outside a
Specified Parameter and Eliminate Liquidity Replenishment Points and
the Gap Quote Policy).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    For the above reasons, Nasdaq believes the proposed rule change is
consistent with the requirements of Section 6(b)(5) of the Act.\11\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \11\ 15 U.S.C. 78f(b)(4) and (5).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

B. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement on Burden on Competition

    The Exchange does not believe that the proposed rule changes will
result in any burden on competition that is not necessary or
appropriate in furtherance of the purposes of the Act. In fact, the
Exchange believes that the proposed rule changes would assist in the
introduction of NextShares, and thereby will promote competition
through innovation in the exchange-traded product marketplace.

C. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement on Comments on the Proposed
Rule Change Received From Members, Participants, or Others

    Written comments were neither solicited nor received.

III. Date of Effectiveness of the Proposed Rule Change and Timing for
Commission Action

    Because the proposed rule change does not (i) significantly affect
the protection of investors or the public interest; (ii) impose any
significant burden on competition; and (iii) become operative for 30
days from the date on which it was filed, or such shorter time as the
Commission may designate if consistent with the protection of investors
and the public interest, the proposed rule change has become effective
pursuant to Section 19(b)(3)(A) of the Act \12\ and Rule 19b-4(f)(6)
thereunder.\13\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \12\ 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(3)(A).
    \13\ 17 CFR 240.19b-4(f)(6). As required under Rule 19b-
4(f)(6)(iii), the Exchange provided the Commission with written
notice of its intent to file the proposed rule change, along with a
brief description and the text of the proposed rule change, at least
five business days prior to the date of filing of the proposed rule
change, or such shorter time as designated by the Commission.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    The Exchange has asked the Commission to waive the 30-day operative
delay so that the proposal may become operative immediately upon
filing. The Exchange stated that waiver of this requirement will allow
the Exchange to implement a Proxy Price Protection threshold similar to
existing mechanisms on other markets and would reduce the risk of and
potentially prevent the erroneous execution of orders on the Exchange.
Accordingly, the Commission believes that waiving the 30-day operative
delay is consistent with the protection of investors and the public
interest and hereby waives the 30-day operative delay and designates
the proposed rule change to be operative upon filing.\14\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \14\ For purposes only of waiving the 30-day operative delay,
the Commission has also considered the proposed rule's impact on
efficiency, competition, and capital formation. See 15 U.S.C.
78c(f).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    At any time within 60 days of the filing of the proposed rule
change, the Commission summarily may temporarily suspend such rule
change if it appears to the Commission that such action is necessary or
appropriate in the public interest, for the protection of investors, or
otherwise in furtherance of the purposes of the Act. If the Commission
takes such action, the Commission shall institute proceedings to
determine whether the proposed rule should be approved or disapproved.

IV. Solicitation of Comments

    Interested persons are invited to submit written data, views, and
arguments concerning the foregoing, including whether the proposed rule
change is consistent with the Act. Comments may be submitted by any of
the following methods:

Electronic Comments

     Use the Commission's Internet comment form (http://www.sec.gov/rules/sro.shtml); or
     Send an email to<EMAIL_ADDRESS>Please include
File Number SR-NASDAQ-2016-026 on the subject line.

Paper Comments

     Send paper comments in triplicate to Brent J. Fields,
Secretary, Securities and Exchange Commission, 100 F Street NE.,
Washington, DC 20549-1090.

All submissions should refer to File Number SR-NASDAQ-2016-026. This
file number should be included on the subject line if email is used. To
help the Commission process and review your comments more efficiently,
please use only one method. The Commission will post all comments on
the Commission's Internet Web site (http://www.sec.gov/rules/sro.shtml). Copies of the submission, all subsequent amendments, all
written statements with respect to the proposed rule change that are
filed with the Commission, and all written communications relating to
the proposed rule change between the Commission and any person, other
than those that may be withheld from the public in accordance with the
provisions of 5 U.S.C. 552, will be available for Web site viewing and
printing in the Commission's Public Reference Room, 100 F Street NE.,
Washington, DC 20549 on official business days between the hours of
10:00 a.m. and 3:00 p.m. Copies of such filing also will be available
for inspection and copying at the principal office of the Exchange. All
comments received will be posted without change; the Commission does
not edit personal identifying information from submissions. You should
submit only information that you wish to make available publicly. All
submissions should refer to File Number SR-NASDAQ-2016-026, and should
be submitted on or before March 23, 2016.

    For the Commission, by the Division of Trading and Markets,
pursuant to delegated authority.\15\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \15\ 17 CFR 200.30-3(a)(12).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

Robert W. Errett,
Deputy Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2016-04502 Filed 3-1-16; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 8011-01-P


[Federal Register Volume 84, Number 26 (Thursday, February 7, 2019)]
[Notices]
[Page 2660]
[FR Doc No: 2019-01419]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION

Federal Aviation Administration

[Summary Notice No. PE-2019-01]

Petition for Exemption; Summary of Petition Received; The Boeing
Company

AGENCY: Federal Aviation Administration (FAA), DOT.

ACTION: Notice of petition for exemption received.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: This notice contains a summary of a petition seeking relief
from specified requirements of Federal Aviation Regulations. The
purpose of this notice is to improve the public's awareness of, and
participation in, the FAA's exemption process. Neither publication of
this notice nor the inclusion or omission of information in the summary
is intended to affect the legal status of the petition or its final
disposition.

DATES: Comments on this petition must identify the petition docket
number and must be received on or before February 27, 2019.

ADDRESSES: Send comments identified by docket number FAA-2018-1082
using any of the following methods:
     Federal eRulemaking Portal: Go to http://www.regulations.gov and follow the online instructions for sending your
comments electronically.
     Mail: Send comments to Docket Operations, M-30; U.S.
Department of Transportation (DOT), 1200 New Jersey Avenue SE, Room
W12-140, West Building, Ground Floor, Washington, DC 20590-0001.
     Hand Delivery or Courier: Take comments to Docket
Operations in Room W12-140 of the West Building, Ground Floor at 200
New Jersey Avenue SE, Washington, DC, between 9 a.m. and 5 p.m., Monday
through Friday, except Federal holidays.
     Fax: Fax comments to Docket Operations at<PHONE_NUMBER>.
    Privacy: In accordance with 5 U.S.C. 553(c), DOT solicits comments
from the public to better inform its rulemaking process. DOT posts
these comments, without edit, including any personal information the
commenter provides, to http://www.regulations.gov, as described in the
system of records notice (DOT/ALL-14 FDMS), which can be reviewed at
http://www.dot.gov/privacy.
    Docket: Background documents or comments received may be read at
http://www.regulations.gov at any time. Follow the online instructions
for accessing the docket or go to the Docket Operations in Room W12-140
of the West Building, Ground Floor at 1200 New Jersey Avenue SE,
Washington, DC, between 9 a.m. and 5 p.m., Monday through Friday,
except Federal holidays.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Deana Stedman, AIR-673, Federal
Aviation Administration, 2200 South 216th Street, Des Moines, WA 98198,
phone and fax<PHONE_NUMBER>, email<EMAIL_ADDRESS>or Alphonso
Pendergrass, ARM-200, Office of Rulemaking, Federal Aviation
Administration, 800 Independence Avenue SW, Washington, DC 20591, phone
202-267-4713, email<EMAIL_ADDRESS>    This notice is published pursuant to 14 CFR 11.85.

    Issued in Des Moines, Washington, on January 31, 2019.
Victor Wicklund,
Manager, Transport Standards Branch.

Petition for Exemption

    Docket No.: FAA-2018-1082.
    Petitioner: The Boeing Company.
    Sections of 14 CFR Affected: Sec. Sec.  25.1316(b) and 25.1317(c).
    Description of Relief Sought: The petitioner is seeking temporary
relief from 14 CFR 25.1316(b), related to requirements for lightning
protection, and 14 CFR 25.1317(c), related to requirements for high-
intensity radiated fields protection, for the aural warning module on
Model 737-7 and 737-8200 MAX airplanes.
[FR Doc. 2019-01419 Filed 2-6-19; 8:45 am]
 BILLING CODE 4910-13-P


[Federal Register Volume 77, Number 136 (Monday, July 16, 2012)]
[Notices]
[Pages 41836-41837]
[FR Doc No: 2012-17207]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

[Release No. 34-67391; File No. SR-OCC-2012-09]

Self-Regulatory Organizations; The Options Clearing Corporation;
Notice of Filing and Immediate Effectiveness of Proposed Rule Change To
Amend OCC's Schedule of Fees to Eliminate Fees for Certain Educational
Brochures

July 10, 2012.
    Pursuant to Section 19(b)(1) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934
(``Act'') \1\ and Rule 19b-4 thereunder, \2\ notice is hereby given
that on June 28, 2012, The Options Clearing Corporation (``OCC'') filed
with the Securities and Exchange Commission (``Commission'') the
proposed rule change as described in Items I, II, and III below, which
Items have been prepared primarily by OCC. OCC filed the proposed rule
change pursuant to Section 19(b)(3)(A) \3\ of the Act and Rule 19b-
4(f)(2) \4\ thereunder.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \1\ 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(1).
    \2\ 17 CFR 240.19b-4.
    \3\ 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(3)(A).
    \4\ 17 CFR 240.19b-4(f)(2).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

I. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement of the Terms of Substance
of the Proposed Rule Change

    The proposed rule change would amend OCC's Schedule of Fees to
eliminate fees for three brochures to reflect that these brochures are
now provided to clearing members free of charge.

II. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement of the Purpose of, and
Statutory Basis for, the Proposed Rule Change

    In its filing with the Commission, OCC included statements
concerning the purpose of and basis for the proposed rule change and
discussed any comments it received on the proposed rule change. The
text of these statements may be examined at the places specified in
Item IV below. OCC has prepared summaries, set forth in sections A, B,
and C below, of the most significant aspects of such statements.\5\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \5\ The Commission has modified the text of the summaries
prepared by OCC.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

A. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement of the Purpose of, and
Statutory Basis for, the Proposed Rule Change

    The purpose of this proposed rule change is to amend OCC's Schedule
of Fees to eliminate fees for three brochures to reflect that these
brochures are now provided to clearing members free of charge. In 2011,
a decision was made to eliminate the nominal fee charged to clearing
members for the following brochures: (i) Taxes & Investing: A Guide for
the Individual Investor; (ii) LEAPS[supreg]; and (iii) Understanding
Stock Options. Since that decision, clearing members have not been
charged for ordering the brochures although the fees continued to be
listed on OCC's fee schedule. OCC proposes to amend its Schedule of
Fees to reflect that these brochures are offered free of charge.
    OCC believes that the proposed rule change is consistent with
Section 17A of the Act because it reflects the elimination of a nominal
fee charged to clearing members for certain educational materials
relating to listed options, thereby providing for the equitable
allocation of reasonable dues, fees, and other charges among its
participants. In addition, the proposed rule change aligns OCC's
Schedule of Fees with current billing practices. OCC believes the
proposed rule change is not inconsistent with any rules of OCC,
including any other rules proposed to be amended.

B. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement on Burden on Competition

    OCC does not believe that the proposed rule change would impose any
burden on competition.

C. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement on Comments on the Proposed
Rule Change Received From Members, Participants or Others

    Written comments were not and are not intended to be solicited with
respect to the proposed rule change and none have been received.

III. Date of Effectiveness of the Proposed Rule Change and Timing for
Commission Action

    The foregoing rule change has become effective upon filing pursuant
to Section 19(b)(3)(A)(ii) of the Act and Rule 19b-4(f)(2) thereunder
because it establishes or changes a due, fee, or other charge
applicable only to a member. OCC will delay the implementation of the
rule change until it is deemed certified under CFTC Regulation Sec.
40.6. At any time within 60 days of the filing of such rule change, the
Commission summarily may temporarily suspend such rule change if it
appears to the Commission that such action is necessary or appropriate
in the public interest, for the protection of investors, or otherwise
in furtherance of the purposes of the Act.

IV. Solicitation of Comments

    Interested persons are invited to submit written data, views, and
arguments concerning the foregoing, including whether the proposed rule
change is consistent with the Act. Comments may be submitted by any of
the following methods:
     Electronic comments may be submitted by using the
Commission's Internet comment form (http://www.sec.gov/rules/sro.shtml)
or send an email to<EMAIL_ADDRESS>Please include File No. SR-
OCC-2012-09 on the subject line.
     Paper comments should be sent in triplicate to Elizabeth
M. Murphy, Secretary, Securities and Exchange Commission, 100 F Street
NE., Washington, DC 20549-1090.

All submissions should refer to File Number SR-OCC-2012-09. This file
number should be included on the subject line if email is used. To help
the Commission process and review your comments more efficiently,
please use only one method. The Commission will post all comments on
the Commission's Internet Web site (http://www.sec.gov/rules/sro.shtml). Copies of the submission, all subsequent amendments, all
written statements with respect to the proposed rule change that are
filed with the Commission, and all written communications relating to
the proposed rule change between the Commission and any person, other
than those that may be withheld from the public in accordance with the
provisions of 5 U.S.C. 552, will be available for Web site viewing and
printing in the Commission's Public Reference Room, 100 F Street NE.,
Washington, DC 20549, on official business days between the hours of 10
a.m. and 3 p.m. Copies of such filings will also be available for
inspection and copying at the principal office of OCC and on OCC's Web
site at http://www.optionsclearing.com/components/docs/legal/rules_and_bylaws/sr_occ_12_09.pdf. All comments received will be posted
without change; the Commission does not edit personal identifying
information from submissions. You should submit only information that
you wish to make available publicly. All submissions should refer to
File Number SR-OCC-2012-09 and should be submitted on or before August
6, 2012.

    For the Commission, by the Division of Trading and Markets,
pursuant to delegated authority.\6\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \6\ 17 CFR 200.30-3(a)(12).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

Kevin O'Neill,
Deputy Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2012-17207 Filed 7-13-12; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 8011-01-P


[Federal Register: January 31, 2008 (Volume 73, Number 21)]
[Notices]
[Page 5903]
[DOCID:fr31ja08-117]

=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION

Federal Aviation Administration

Agency Information Collection Activity Seeking OMB Approval

AGENCY: Federal Aviation Administration (FAA), DOT.

ACTION: Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The FAA invites public comments about our intention to request
the Office of Management and Budget's (OMB) revision of a current
information collection. The Federal Register Notice with a 60-day
comment period soliciting comments on the following collection of
information was published on October 29, 2007, vol. 72, no. 208, pages
61198-61199. The DOT/FAA certification program is implemented by Title
14 CFR parts 61 and 67. The parts prescribe minimum airman medical
standards, and duration of a medical certificate.

DATES: Please submit comments by March 3, 2008.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Carla Mauney at<EMAIL_ADDRESS>
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

Federal Aviation Administration (FAA)

    Title: Medical Standards and Certification.
    Type of Request: Revision of a currently approved collection.
    OMB Control Number: 2120-0034.
    Form(s): FAA Forms 8500-7, 8500-8, 8500-14, 8500-20.
    Affected Public: An estimated 380,000 Respondents.
    Frequency: This information is collected on occasion.
    Estimated Average Burden per Response: Approximately 1.3 hours per
response.
    Estimated Annual Burden Hours: An estimated 573,076 hours annually.
    Abstract: The DOT/FAA certification program is implemented by Title
14 CFR parts 61 and 67. The parts prescribe minimum airman medical
standards, and duration of a medical certificate. Information collected
substantiates the applicant's eligibility.

ADDRESSES: Interested persons are invited to submit written comments on
the proposed information collection to the Office of Information and
Regulatory Affairs, Office of Management and Budget. Comments should be
addressed to Nathan Lesser, Desk Officer, Department of Transportation/
FAA, and sent via electronic mail to<EMAIL_ADDRESS>or
faxed to<PHONE_NUMBER>.
    Comments are invited on: Whether the proposed collection of
information is necessary for the proper performance of the functions of
the Department, including whether the information will have practical
utility; the accuracy of the Department's estimates of the burden of
the proposed information collection; ways to enhance the quality,
utility, and clarity of the information to be collected; and ways to
minimize the burden of the collection of information on respondents,
including the use of automated collection techniques or other forms of
information technology.

    Issued in Washington, DC, on January 23, 2008.
Carla Mauney,
FAA Information Collection Clearance Officer, IT Enterprises Business
Services Division, AES-200.
[FR Doc. 08-426 Filed 1-30-08; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4910-13-M


[Federal Register: September 2, 2010 (Volume 75, Number 170)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Page 53861-53863]
[DOCID:fr02se10-10]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION

Federal Aviation Administration

14 CFR Part 39

[Docket No. FAA-2010-0632; Directorate Identifier 2010-CE-025-AD;
Amendment 39-16426; AD 2010-18-01]
RIN 2120-AA64

Airworthiness Directives; Robert E. Rust, Jr. Model DeHavilland
DH.C1 Chipmunk 21, DH.C1 Chipmunk 22, and DH.C1 Chipmunk 22A Airplanes

AGENCY: Federal Aviation Administration (FAA), Department of
Transportation (DOT).

ACTION: Final rule.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: We are adopting a new airworthiness directive (AD) for all
Robert E. Rust, Jr. Models DeHavilland DH.C1 Chipmunk 21, DH.C1
Chipmunk 22, and DH.C1 Chipmunk 22A airplanes. This AD requires you to
do a one-time inspection of the flap operating system for an unapproved
latch plate design installation, with replacement as necessary. This AD
results from a report of a latch plate failing in service that was not
made in accordance with the applicable de Havilland drawing. We are
issuing this AD to detect and correct an unauthorized latch plate
design installation which could result in an un-commanded retraction of
the flaps. This failure could lead to a stall during a landing
approach.

DATES: This AD becomes effective on October 7, 2010.
    On October 7, 2010, the Director of the Federal Register approved
the incorporation by reference of certain publications listed in this
AD.

ADDRESSES: For service information identified in this AD, contact de
Havilland Support Limited, Duxford Airfield, Cambridgeshire, CB22 4QR,
England, phone: +44 (0) 1223 830090; fax: +44 (0) 1223 830085; e-mail:
<EMAIL_ADDRESS>Internet: http://www.dhsupport.com/.
    To view the AD docket, go to U.S. Department of Transportation,
Docket Operations, M-30, West Building Ground Floor, Room W12-140, 1200
New Jersey Avenue, SE., Washington, DC 20590, or on the Internet at
http://www.regulations.gov. The docket number is FAA-2010-0632;
Directorate Identifier 2010-CE-025-AD.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Carey O'Kelley, Aerospace Engineer,
FAA, Atlanta Aircraft Certification Office (ACO), 1701 Columbia Avenue,
College Park, Georgia 30337; telephone:<PHONE_NUMBER>; fax: (404) 474-
5606.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

Discussion

    On June 14, 2010, we issued a proposal to amend part 39 of the
Federal Aviation Regulations (14 CFR part 39) to include an AD that
would apply to all Robert E. Rust, Jr. Models DeHavilland DH.C1
Chipmunk 21, DH.C1 Chipmunk 22, and DH.C1 Chipmunk 22A airplanes. This
proposal was published in the Federal Register as a notice of proposed
rulemaking (NPRM) on June 21, 2010 (75 FR 34956). The NPRM proposed to
require a one-time inspection of the flap operating system for an
unapproved latch plate design installation with replacement as
necessary.

Comments

    We provided the public the opportunity to participate in developing
this AD. We received no comments on the proposal or on the
determination of the cost to the public.

Conclusion

    We have carefully reviewed the available data and determined that
air safety and the public interest require adopting the AD as proposed
except for minor editorial corrections. We have determined that these
minor corrections:
     Are consistent with the intent that was proposed in the
NPRM for correcting the unsafe condition; and
     Do not add any additional burden upon the public than was
already proposed in the NPRM.

Costs of Compliance

    We estimate that this AD affects 64 airplanes in the U.S. registry.
    We estimate the following costs to do the inspection:

----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
                                                                                Total cost
                   Labor cost                                 Parts cost               Total cost      on U.S.
                                                                                per airplane    operators
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
3 work-hours x $85 per hour = $255..............  Not Applicable....................         $255       $16,320
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

    We estimate the following costs to do any necessary replacements
that would be required based on the results of the inspection. We have
no way of determining the number of airplanes that may need this
replacement:

------------------------------------------------------------------------
                                                             Total cost
                 Labor cost                    Parts cost   per airplane
------------------------------------------------------------------------
.5 work-hour x $85 per hour = $42.50........         $175       $217.50
------------------------------------------------------------------------

Authority for This Rulemaking

    Title 49 of the United States Code specifies the FAA's authority to
issue rules on aviation safety. Subtitle I, Section 106 describes the
authority of the FAA Administrator. Subtitle VII, Aviation Programs,
describes in more detail the scope of the agency's authority.
    We are issuing this rulemaking under the authority described in
Subtitle VII, Part A, Subpart III, Section 44701, ``General
requirements.'' Under that section, Congress charges the FAA with
promoting safe flight of civil aircraft in air commerce by prescribing
regulations for practices, methods, and procedures the Administrator
finds necessary for safety in air commerce. This regulation is within
the scope of that authority because it addresses an unsafe condition
that is likely to exist or develop on products identified in this AD.

Regulatory Findings

    We have determined that this AD will not have federalism
implications under Executive Order 13132. This AD will not have a
substantial direct effect on the States, on the relationship between
the national government and the States, or on the distribution of power
and responsibilities among the various levels of government.
    For the reasons discussed above, I certify that this AD:
    1. Is not a ``significant regulatory action'' under Executive Order
12866;
    2. Is not a ``significant rule'' under the DOT Regulatory Policies
and Procedures (44 FR 11034, February 26, 1979); and
    3. Will not have a significant economic impact, positive or
negative, on a substantial number of small entities under the criteria
of the Regulatory Flexibility Act.
    We prepared a summary of the costs to comply with this AD (and
other information as included in the Regulatory Evaluation) and placed
it in the AD Docket. You may get a copy of this summary by sending a
request to us at the address listed under ADDRESSES. Include ``Docket
No. FAA-2010-0632; Directorate Identifier 2010-CE-025-AD'' in your
request.

List of Subjects in 14 CFR Part 39

    Air transportation, Aircraft, Aviation safety, Incorporation by
reference, Safety.

Adoption of the Amendment

    Accordingly, under the authority delegated to me by the
Administrator, the Federal Aviation Administration amends part 39 of
the Federal Aviation Regulations (14 CFR part 39) as follows:

PART 39--AIRWORTHINESS DIRECTIVES

    1. The authority citation for part 39 continues to read as follows:

    Authority: 49 U.S.C. 106(g), 40113, 44701.

Sec.  39.13  [Amended]

0
2. FAA amends Sec.  39.13 by adding the following new AD:

2010-18-01 Robert E. Rust, Jr.: Amendment 39-16426; Docket No. FAA-
2010-0632; Directorate Identifier 2010-CE-025-AD.

Effective Date

    (a) This AD becomes effective on October 7, 2010.

Affected ADs

    (b) None.

Applicability

    (c) This AD applies to Models DeHavilland DH.C1 Chipmunk 21,
DH.C1 Chipmunk 22, and DH.C1 Chipmunk 22A airplanes, all serial
numbers, that are certificated in any category.

    Note:  These airplanes are also identified as CHIPMUNK 22A,
CHIPMUNK DHC-1T10, CHIPMUNK T.10 MK-22, DH.C1 MK22A, DHC-1, DHC-1
CHIPMUNK, DHC-1 CHIPMUNK 22, DHC-1 SERIES 22, or DHC-1 T.MK. 10.

Subject

    (d) Air Transport Association of America (ATA) Code 27: Flight
Controls.

Unsafe Condition

    (e) This AD results from a report of a latch plate supplied
under part number (P/N) C1-CF-1489 failing in service. The part in
question was not manufactured to the applicable de Havilland
drawing. The unapproved latch plate was made of a shaft that was
pressed into a plate, rather than being machined from bar material
as one piece. The shaft and plate on the unapproved part can become
separated or bent, resulting in rapid wear and failure of the part.
This condition, if not corrected, could result in an un-commanded
retraction of the flaps. This failure could lead to a stall during a
landing approach.

Compliance

    (f) To address this problem, you must do the following, unless
already done:

----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
               Actions                             Compliance                            Procedures
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
(1) Inspect the flap operating        Within 50 hours time-in-service       Follow de Havilland Support Limited
 system to identify the P/N of the     (TIS) after October 7, 2010 (the      Technical News Sheet (TNS) CT(C1)
 latch plate installed. If latch       effective date of this AD) or         No 208 Issue 1, dated January 30,
 plate P/N C1-CF-1489 is installed,    within 90 days after October 7,       2009.
 inspect the latch plate to            2010 (the effective date of this
 determine if it is in compliance      AD), whichever occurs first.
 with the design standard. An
 unapproved latch plate P/N C1-CF-
 1489 is made from two pieces
 pressed together while one that
 complies with the design standard
 is machined in one piece from bar
 material.
(2) If during the inspection          Before further flight after the       Follow de Havilland Support Limited
 required in paragraph (f)(1) of       inspection where the unapproved       TNS CT(C1) No 208 Issue 1, dated
 this AD an unapproved latch plate P/  latch plate P/N C1-CF-1849 was        January 30, 2009.
 N C1-CF-1489 is found, replace the    found.
 latch plate with a latch plate that
 complies with the design standard.
 The following U.S. standard
 hardware may be substituted for the
 hardware specified in the service
 information:
(i) 1/16'' diameter cotter pin that
 is P/N MS24665-153 (or equivalent)
 in place of split pin P/N SP90/C;
 and
(ii) Washer that is P/N MS15795-806B
 (or equivalent) in place of washer
 P/N SP13/B.
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Alternative Methods of Compliance (AMOCs)

    (g) The Manager, Atlanta Aircraft Certification Office (ACO),
FAA, has the authority to approve AMOCs for this AD, if requested
using the procedures found in 14 CFR 39.19. Send information to
ATTN: Carey O'Kelley, Aerospace Engineer, FAA, Atlanta ACO, 1701
Columbia Avenue, College Park, Georgia 30337; telephone: (404) 474-
5543; fax:<PHONE_NUMBER>. Before using any approved AMOC on any
airplane to which the AMOC applies, notify your appropriate
principal inspector (PI) in the FAA Flight Standards District Office
(FSDO), or lacking a PI, your local FSDO.

Material Incorporated by Reference

    (h) You must use de Havilland Support Limited TNS CT(C1) No 208
Issue 1, dated January 30, 2009, to do the actions required by this
AD, unless the AD specifies otherwise.
    (1) The Director of the Federal Register approved the
incorporation by reference of this service information under 5
U.S.C. 552(a) and 1 CFR part 51.
    (2) For service information identified in this AD, contact de
Havilland Support Limited, Duxford Airfield, Cambridgeshire, CB22
4QR, England, phone: +44 (0) 1223 830090; fax: +44 (0) 1223 830085;
e-mail<EMAIL_ADDRESS>Internet: http://www.dhsupport.com/.
    (3) You may review copies of the service information
incorporated by reference for this AD at the FAA, Central Region,
Office of the Regional Counsel, 901 Locust, Kansas City, Missouri
64106. For information on the availability of this material at the
Central Region, call<PHONE_NUMBER>.
    (4) You may also review copies of the service information
incorporated by reference for this AD at the National Archives and
Records Administration (NARA). For information on the availability
of this material at NARA, call<PHONE_NUMBER>, or go to: http://
www.archives.gov/federal_register/code_of_federal_regulations/
ibr_locations.html.

    Issued in Kansas City, Missouri, on August 25, 2010.
John R. Colomy,
Acting Manager, Small Airplane Directorate, Aircraft Certification
Service.
[FR Doc. 2010-21741 Filed 9-1-10; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910-13-P


[Federal Register Volume 81, Number 23 (Thursday, February 4, 2016)]
[Notices]
[Page 5999]
[FR Doc No: 2016-02078]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission

[Project No. 14683-000]

Mr. Adam R. Rousselle, II; Notice of Preliminary Permit
Application Accepted for Filing and Soliciting Comments, Motions To
Intervene, and Competing Applications

    On June 17, 2015, Mr. Adam R. Rousselle, II, filed an application
for a preliminary permit, pursuant to section 4(f) of the Federal Power
Act (FPA), proposing to study the feasibility of the Blue Marsh Dam
Water Power Project (project) to be located on Tulpehocken Creek, in
Lower Heidelberg Township and Bern Township in Berks County,
Pennsylvania. The sole purpose of a preliminary permit, if issued, is
to grant the permit holder priority to file a license application
during the permit term. A preliminary permit does not authorize the
permit holder to perform any land-disturbing activities or otherwise
enter upon lands or waters owned by others without the owners' express
permission.
    The project would consist of the following: (1) A proposed 6-foot-
diameter penstock; (2) a proposed powerhouse containing two generating
units having a total installed capacity of 2,500 kilowatts; (3) a
tailrace returning flow to Tulpehocken Creek; (4) a proposed 0.9-mile-
long, 12.47-kilovolt transmission line interconnecting with the
Pennsylvania Power Company system; and (5) appurtenant facilities. The
proposed project would have an average annual generation of about
9,943,000 kilowatt-hours, which would be sold to a local utility.
    Applicant Contact: Mr. Adam R. Rousselle, II, 104 Autumn Trace
Drive, New Hope, PA 18938; phone:<PHONE_NUMBER>.
    FERC Contact: Tim Looney; phone:<PHONE_NUMBER>.
    Deadline for filing comments, motions to intervene, competing
applications (without notices of intent), or notices of intent to file
competing applications: 60 days from the issuance of this notice.\1\
Competing applications and notices of intent must meet the requirements
of 18 CFR 4.36.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \1\ The Commission is issuing a second notice for this project
because some municipalities may not have been notified by the first
notice issued on September 9, 2015.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    The Commission strongly encourages electronic filing. Please file
comments, motions to intervene, notices of intent, and competing
applications using the Commission's eFiling system at http://www.ferc.gov/docs-filing/efiling.asp. Commenters can submit brief
comments up to 6,000 characters, without prior registration, using the
eComment system at http://www.ferc.gov/docs-filing/ecomment.asp. You
must include your name and contact information at the end of your
comments. For assistance, please contact FERC Online Support at
<EMAIL_ADDRESS>(866) 208-3676 (toll free), or (202) 502-
8659 (TTY). In lieu of electronic filing, please send a paper copy to:
Secretary, Federal Energy Regulatory Commission, 888 First Street NE.,
Washington, DC 20426. The first page of any filing should include
docket number P-14683-000.
    More information about this project, including a copy of the
application, can be viewed or printed on the ``eLibrary'' link of the
Commission's Web site at http://www.ferc.gov/docs-filing/elibrary.asp.
Enter the docket number (P-14683) in the docket number field to access
the document. For assistance, contact FERC Online Support.

    Dated: January 29, 2016.
Nathaniel J. Davis, Sr.,
Deputy Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2016-02078 Filed 2-3-16; 8:45 am]
 BILLING CODE 6717-01-P


[Federal Register: February 2, 2010 (Volume 75, Number 21)]
[Notices]
[Page 5307-5308]
[DOCID:fr02fe10-49]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission

Combined Notice of Filings 1

January 26, 2010.
    Take notice that the Commission received the following electric
rate filings:

    Docket Numbers: ER99-845-019.
    Applicants: Puget Sound Energy, Inc.
    Description: Puget Sound Energy, Inc.'s Notice of Closing and
Notice of Non-Material Change in Status Regarding Acquisition of
Fredonia Units 3&4.
    Filed Date: 01/26/2010.
    Accession Number: 20100126-5018.
    Comment Date: 5 p.m. Eastern Time on Tuesday, February 16, 2010.

    Docket Numbers: ER01-138-007.
    Applicants: Delta Person Limited Partnership.
    Description: Notice of Non-Material Change in Facts of Delta Person
Limited Partnership.
    Filed Date: 01/25/2010.
    Accession Number: 20100125-5170.
    Comment Date: 5 p.m. Eastern Time on Tuesday, February 16, 2010.

    Docket Numbers: ER05-516-002; ER05-911-002; ER05-1264-001; ER06-95-
003; ER06-948-001; ER06-1306-001; ER07-114-001; ER07-812-002.
    Applicants: Pacific Gas and Electric Company.
    Description: Pacific Gas and Electric Company submits filing and
acceptance a compliance filing in response to and in accordance with
the directives in the Order Conditionally Approving Uncontested
Settlement etc.
    Filed Date: 01/25/2010.
    Accession Number: 20100125-0220.
    Comment Date: 5 p.m. Eastern Time on Tuesday, February 16, 2010.

    Docket Numbers: ER08-912-009; ER05-365-022.
    Applicants: Iberdrola Renewables, Inc., Elk River Windfarm, LLC.

    Description: Iberdrola Renewables et al. submits supplemental
filing to indicate their classification as a Category 1 or Category 2
Seller etc.
    Filed Date: 01/22/2010.
    Accession Number: 20100125-0024.
    Comment Date: 5 p.m. Eastern Time on Friday, February 12, 2010.

    Docket Numbers: ER09-1364-002.
    Applicants: Michigan Power Limited Partnership.
    Description: Michigan Power Limited Partnership Notice of Market-
Based Rate Non-Material Change In Facts.
    Filed Date: 01/25/2010.
    Accession Number: 20100125-5173.
    Comment Date: 5 p.m. Eastern Time on Tuesday, February 16, 2010.

    Docket Numbers: ER10-43-000.
    Applicants: E.ON U.S. LLC.
    Description: E.ON U.S, LLC submits Supplement to Filing Response to
Deficiency Notice.
    Filed Date: 1/20/2010.
    Accession Number: 20100121-0008.
    Comment Date: 5 p.m. Eastern Time on Wednesday, February 1, 2010.

    Docket Numbers: ER10-397-001.
    Applicants: Cesarie, Inc.
    Description: Cesarie, Inc submits the amended petition for
Acceptance of Initial Tariff, Waivers and Blanket Authority.
    Filed Date: 01/22/2010.
    Accession Number: 20100125-0209.
    Comment Date: 5 p.m. Eastern Time on Friday, February 12, 2010.

    Docket Numbers: ER10-550-001.
    Applicants: Southwest Power Pool, Inc.
    Description: Southwest Power Pool, Inc submits a request for an
effective date of 3/1/10 for the December 31 filing of an Open Access
Transmission Tariff.
    Filed Date: 01/21/2010.
    Accession Number: 20100122-0202.
    Comment Date: 5 p.m. Eastern Time on Thursday, February 11, 2010.

    Docket Numbers: ER10-621-000.
    Applicants: Noble Energy Marketing and Trading Corp.
    Description: Application of Noble Energy Marketing and Trade Corp
for expedited order accepting initial rate schedule, waiving
regulations, and granting blanket approvals.
    Filed Date: 01/21/2010.
    Accession Number: 20100122-0204.
    Comment Date: 5 p.m. Eastern Time on Thursday, February 11, 2010.

    Docket Numbers: ER10-628-000.
    Applicants: Peetz Logan Interconnect, LLC.
    Description: Peetz Logan Interconnect, LLC submits an Amended and
Restated Transmission Service Agreement with Northern Colorado Wind
Energy, LLC, et al.
    Filed Date: 01/21/2010.
    Accession Number: 20100122-0201.
    Comment Date: 5 p.m. Eastern Time on Thursday, February 11, 2010.

    Docket Numbers: ER10-629-000.
    Applicants: Xcel Energy Services Inc.
    Description: Xcel Energy Operating Companies submits amendments to
the First Amended Joint Operating Agreements, FERC Electric Tariff,
First Revised No 1.
    Filed Date: 01/21/2010.
    Accession Number: 20100122-0205.
    Comment Date: 5 p.m. Eastern Time on Thursday, February 11, 2010.

    Docket Numbers: ER10-638-000.
    Applicants: American Electric Power Service Corporation.
    Description: American Electric Power Service Corporation submits
Twenty First Revised Interconnection and Local Delivery Service
Agreement between AEP and Buckeye Power, Inc.
    Filed Date: 01/25/2010.
    Accession Number: 20100125-0219.
    Comment Date: 5 p.m. Eastern Time on Tuesday, February 16, 2010.

    Take notice that the Commission received the following PURPA
210(m)(3) filings:

    Docket Numbers: QM10-2-002.
    Applicants: The Detroit Edison Company.
    Description: Response of The Detroit Edison Company to Deficiency
Letter.
    Filed Date: 01/22/2010.
    Accession Number: 20100122-5092.
    Comment Date: 5 p.m. Eastern Time on Friday, February 22, 2010.

    Any person desiring to intervene or to protest in any of the above
proceedings must file in accordance with Rules 211 and 214 of the
Commission's Rules of Practice and Procedure (18 CFR 385.211 and
385.214) on or before 5 p.m. Eastern time on the specified comment
date. It is not necessary to separately intervene again in a subdocket
related to a compliance filing if you have previously intervened in the
same docket. Protests will be considered by the Commission in
determining the appropriate action to be taken, but will not serve to
make protestants parties to the proceeding. Anyone filing a motion to
intervene or protest must serve a copy of that document on the
Applicant. In reference to filings initiating a new proceeding,
interventions or protests submitted on or before the comment deadline
need not be served on persons other than the Applicant.
    The Commission encourages electronic submission of protests and
interventions in lieu of paper, using the FERC Online links at http://
www.ferc.gov. To facilitate electronic service, persons with Internet
access who will eFile a document and/or be listed as a contact for an
intervenor must create and validate an eRegistration account using the
eRegistration link. Select the eFiling link to log on and submit the
intervention or protests.
    Persons unable to file electronically should submit an original and
14 copies of the intervention or protest to the Federal Energy
Regulatory Commission, 888 First St. NE., Washington, DC 20426.
    The filings in the above proceedings are accessible in the
Commission's eLibrary system by clicking on the appropriate link in the
above list. They are also available for review in the Commission's
Public Reference Room in Washington, DC. There is an eSubscription link
on the Web site that enables subscribers to receive e-mail notification
when a document is added to a subscribed docket(s). For assistance with
any FERC Online service, please e-mail<EMAIL_ADDRESS>or
call<PHONE_NUMBER> (toll free). For TTY, call<PHONE_NUMBER>.

Nathaniel J. Davis, Sr.,
Deputy Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2010-2082 Filed 2-1-10; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6717-01-P


[Federal Register Volume 88, Number 186 (Wednesday, September 27, 2023)]
[Notices]
[Page 66480]
[FR Doc No: 2023-21021]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY

Federal Emergency Management Agency

[Internal Agency Docket No. FEMA-4723-DR; Docket ID FEMA-2023-0001]

New York; Major Disaster and Related Determinations

AGENCY: Federal Emergency Management Agency, DHS.

ACTION: Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: This is a notice of the Presidential declaration of a major
disaster for the State of New York (FEMA-4723-DR), dated July 22, 2023,
and related determinations.

DATES: The declaration was issued July 22, 2023.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Dean Webster, Office of Response and
Recovery, Federal Emergency Management Agency, 500 C Street SW,
Washington, DC 20472,<PHONE_NUMBER>.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Notice is hereby given that, in a letter
dated July 22, 2023, the President issued a major disaster declaration
under the authority of the Robert T. Stafford Disaster Relief and
Emergency Assistance Act, 42 U.S.C. 5121 et seq. (the ``Stafford
Act''), as follows:

    I have determined that the damage in certain areas of the State
of New York resulting from severe storms and flooding during the
period of July 9 to July 10, 2023, is of sufficient severity and
magnitude to warrant a major disaster declaration under the Robert
T. Stafford Disaster Relief and Emergency Assistance Act, 42 U.S.C.
5121 et seq. (the ``Stafford Act''). Therefore, I declare that such
a major disaster exists in the State of New York.
    In order to provide Federal assistance, you are hereby
authorized to allocate from funds available for these purposes such
amounts as you find necessary for Federal disaster assistance and
administrative expenses.
    You are authorized to provide Public Assistance in the
designated areas and Hazard Mitigation throughout the State.
Consistent with the requirement that Federal assistance be
supplemental, any Federal funds provided under the Stafford Act for
Public Assistance and Hazard Mitigation will be limited to 75
percent of the total eligible costs.
    Further, you are authorized to make changes to this declaration
for the approved assistance to the extent allowable under the
Stafford Act.

    The Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA) hereby gives notice
that pursuant to the authority vested in the Administrator, under
Executive Order 12148, as amended, Lai Sun Yee, of FEMA is appointed to
act as the Federal Coordinating Officer for this major disaster.
    The following areas of the State of New York have been designated
as adversely affected by this major disaster:

    Clinton, Dutchess, Essex, Hamilton, Ontario, Orange, Putnam, and
Rockland Counties for Public Assistance.
    All areas within the State of New York are eligible for
assistance under the Hazard Mitigation Grant Program.
    The following Catalog of Federal Domestic Assistance Numbers
(CFDA) are to be used for reporting and drawing funds: 97.030,
Community Disaster Loans; 97.031, Cora Brown Fund; 97.032, Crisis
Counseling; 97.033, Disaster Legal Services; 97.034, Disaster
Unemployment Assistance (DUA); 97.046, Fire Management Assistance
Grant; 97.048, Disaster Housing Assistance to Individuals and
Households In Presidentially Declared Disaster Areas; 97.049,
Presidentially Declared Disaster Assistance--Disaster Housing
Operations for Individuals and Households; 97.050, Presidentially
Declared Disaster Assistance to Individuals and Households--Other
Needs; 97.036, Disaster Grants--Public Assistance (Presidentially
Declared Disasters); 97.039, Hazard Mitigation Grant.

Deanne Criswell,
Administrator, Federal Emergency Management Agency.
[FR Doc. 2023-21021 Filed 9-26-23; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 9111-23-P