[Federal Register Volume 82, Number 212 (Friday, November 3, 2017)]
[Notices]
[Pages 51233-51234]
[FR Doc No: 2017-23940]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission

[Docket Nos. CP18-7-000: PF17-5-000]

Port Arthur Pipeline, LLC; Notice of Application

    Take notice that on October 16, 2017, Port Arthur Pipeline, LLC
(Port Arthur Pipeline), 2925 Briarpark, Suite 900, Houston, Texas
77042, pursuant to Section 7(c) of the NGA, and Parts 157 and 284 of
the Commission's regulations, filed an application requesting a
certificate of public convenience and necessity to construct, own, and
operate its Louisiana Connector Project.
    The Louisiana Connector Project consists of 131 miles of new 42-
inch-diameter pipeline, a new 89,900 horsepower compressor station,
interconnection facilities with interstate and intrastate natural gas
facilities, and other appurtenant facilities. The Louisiana Connector
Project is designed to deliver up to 2,000 million cubic feet (MMcf)
per day of natural gas to the Liquefaction Project that is currently
being developed by Port Arthur LNG, LLC and PALNG Common Facilities
Company, LLC and is under review by the Commission in Docket No. CP17-
20-000. The Louisiana Connector Project facilities will extend from an
interconnect with Columbia Gas Transmission located northeast of
Eunice, Louisiana in St. Landry Parish through Evangeline, Allen,
Beauregard, Calcasieu, and Cameron Parishes in Louisiana and Orange and
Jefferson Counties in Texas and terminate at the proposed Liquefaction
Project south of Port Arthur in Jefferson County, Texas. The cost of
the proposed project is $1,207,584,005, all as more fully set forth in
the application which is on file with the Commission and open to public
inspection. The filing is available for review at the Commission in the
Public Reference Room or may be viewed on the Commission's Web site web
at http://www.ferc.gov using the ``eLibrary'' link. Enter the docket
number excluding the last three digits in the docket number field to
access the document. For assistance, contact FERC at
[email protected] or call toll-free,<PHONE_NUMBER> or TYY,
(202) 502-8659.
    On March 13, 2017, the Commission staff granted Port Arthur
Pipeline's request to utilize the Pre-Filing Process and assigned
Docket No. PF17-5-000 to staff activities involved in the Louisiana
Connector Project. Now, as of the filing of the October 16, 2017
application, the Pre-Filing Process for this project has ended. From
this time forward, this proceeding will be conducted in Docket No.
CP18-7-000, as noted in the caption of this Notice.
    Any questions regarding this application should be directed to
Jerrod L. Harrison, Senior Counsel, Port Arthur Pipeline, 488 8th
Avenue, San Diego, CA 9210, by phone at<PHONE_NUMBER>, or by email to
[email protected].
    Pursuant to section 157.9 of the Commission's rules, 18 CFR 157.9,
within 90 days of this Notice, the Commission staff will issue a Notice
of Schedule for Environmental Review. If a Notice of Schedule for
Environmental Review is issued, it will indicate, among other
milestones, the anticipated date for the Commission staff's issuance of
the final environmental impact statement (FEIS) for this proposal. The
issuance of a Notice of Schedule for Environmental Review will serve to
notify federal and state agencies of the timing for the completion of
all necessary reviews, and the subsequent need to complete all federal
authorizations within 90 days of the date of issuance of the Commission
staff's FEIS.
    There are two ways to become involved in the Commission's review of
this project. First, any person wishing to obtain legal status by
becoming a party to the proceedings for this project should, on or
before the comment date stated below, file with the Federal Energy
Regulatory Commission, 888 First Street NE., Washington, DC 20426, a
motion to intervene in accordance with the requirements of the
Commission's Rules of Practice and Procedure (18 CFR 385.214 or
385.211)

and the Regulations under the NGA (18 CFR 157.10). A person obtaining
party status will be placed on the service list maintained by the
Secretary of the Commission and will receive copies of all documents
filed by the applicant and by all other parties. A party must submit
five copies of filings made with the Commission and must mail a copy to
the applicant and to every other party in the proceeding. Only parties
to the proceeding can ask for court review of Commission orders in the
proceeding.
    However, a person does not have to intervene in order to have
comments considered. The second way to participate is by filing with
the Secretary of the Commission, as soon as possible, an original and
two copies of comments in support of or in opposition to this project.
The Commission will consider these comments in determining the
appropriate action to be taken, but the filing of a comment alone will
not serve to make the filer a party to the proceeding. The Commission's
rules require that persons filing comments in opposition to the project
provide copies of their protests only to the party or parties directly
involved in the protest.
    Persons who wish to comment only on the environmental review of
this project should submit an original and two copies of their comments
to the Secretary of the Commission. Environmental commenters will be
placed on the Commission's environmental mailing list, will receive
copies of the environmental documents, and will be notified of meetings
associated with the Commission's environmental review process.
Environmental commenters will not be required to serve copies of filed
documents on all other parties. However, the non-party commenters will
not receive copies of all documents filed by other parties or issued by
the Commission (except for the mailing of environmental documents
issued by the Commission) and will not have the right to seek court
review of the Commission's final order.
    The Commission strongly encourages electronic filings of comments,
protests and interventions in lieu of paper using the eFiling link at
http://www.ferc.gov. Persons unable to file electronically should
submit an original and five copies of the protest or intervention to
the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission, 888 First Street NE.,
Washington, DC 20426.
    Comment Date: 5:00 p.m. Eastern Time on November 20, 2017.

    Dated: October 30, 2017.
Nathaniel J. Davis, Sr.,
Deputy Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2017-23940 Filed 11-2-17; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6717-01-P


[Federal Register Volume 76, Number 113 (Monday, June 13, 2011)]
[Notices]
[Page 34244]
[FR Doc No: 2011-14581]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY

Federal Emergency Management Agency

[Internal Agency Docket No. FEMA-1980-DR; Docket ID FEMA-2011-0001]

Missouri; Amendment No. 5 to Notice of a Major Disaster
Declaration

AGENCY: Federal Emergency Management Agency, DHS.

ACTION: Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: This notice amends the notice of a major disaster for the
State of Missouri (FEMA-1980-DR), dated May 9, 2011, and related
determinations.

DATES: Effective Date: May 31, 2011.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Tod Wells, Recovery Directorate,
Federal Emergency Management Agency, 500 C Street, SW., Washington, DC
20472,<PHONE_NUMBER>.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Notice is hereby given that, on May 31,
2011, the President amended the cost-sharing arrangements regarding
Federal funds provided under the authority of the Robert T. Stafford
Disaster Relief and Emergency Assistance Act, 42 U.S.C. 5121 et seq.
(the ``Stafford Act''), as follows:

    A ninety percent (90%) Federal cost share for all debris
removal, including direct Federal assistance, for those areas within
counties designated for Public Assistance that are within, or
immediately adjacent to, areas of ``extensive'' or ``catastrophic''
damage directly caused by the EF-5 tornado that struck Missouri on
May 22, 2011, as determined by the Federal Coordinating Officer
applying objective standards used by the National Geospatial-
Intelligence Agency. I authorize this cost-share adjustment
beginning May 22, 2011, through August 7, 2011. FEMA and the State
of Missouri shall pursue any applicable private insurance payments
for debris removal to reimburse Federal costs to the extent
permitted by law.
    This adjustment to State and local cost sharing applies only to
Public Assistance costs, including direct Federal assistance, for
eligible debris removal for those areas within counties designated
for Public Assistance that are within, or immediately adjacent to,
areas of ``extensive'' or ``catastrophic'' damage directly caused by
the May 22, 2011, EF-5 tornado as determined above by the Federal
Coordinating Officer. All other Public Assistance costs will
continue to be reimbursed at 75 percent of total eligible costs. The
law specifically prohibits a similar adjustment for funds provided
to States for Other Needs Assistance (Section 408) and the Hazard
Mitigation Grant Program (Section 404). These funds will continue to
be reimbursed at 75 percent of total eligible costs.

(The following Catalog of Federal Domestic Assistance Numbers (CFDA)
are to be used for reporting and drawing funds: 97.030, Community
Disaster Loans; 97.031, Cora Brown Fund; 97.032, Crisis Counseling;
97.033, Disaster Legal Services; 97.034, Disaster Unemployment
Assistance (DUA); 97.046, Fire Management Assistance Grant; 97.048,
Disaster Housing Assistance to Individuals and Households in
Presidentially Declared Disaster Areas; 97.049, Presidentially
Declared Disaster Assistance--Disaster Housing Operations for
Individuals and Households; 97.050, Presidentially Declared Disaster
Assistance to Individuals and Households--Other Needs; 97.036,
Disaster Grants--Public Assistance (Presidentially Declared
Disasters); 97.039, Hazard Mitigation Grant.)

    Dated: June 6, 2011.
W. Craig Fugate,
Administrator, Federal Emergency Management Agency.
[FR Doc. 2011-14581 Filed 6-10-11; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 9111-23-P


[Federal Register Volume 86, Number 226 (Monday, November 29, 2021)]
[Notices]
[Pages 67777-67780]
[FR Doc No: 2021-25893]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

[Release No. 34-93646; File No. SR-CBOE-2021-067]

Self-Regulatory Organizations; Cboe Exchange, Inc.; Notice of
Filing and Immediate Effectiveness of a Proposed Rule Change To Add a
Held Order Instruction

November 22, 2021.
    Pursuant to Section 19(b)(1) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934
(the ``Act''),\1\ and Rule 19b-4 thereunder,\2\ notice is hereby given
that on November 10, 2021, Cboe Exchange, Inc. (the ``Exchange'' or
``Cboe Options'') filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission
(the ``Commission'') the proposed rule change as described in Items I
and II below, which Items have been prepared by the Exchange. The
Exchange filed the proposal as a ``non-controversial'' proposed rule
change pursuant to Section 19(b)(3)(A)(iii) of the Act \3\ and Rule
19b-4(f)(6) thereunder.\4\ The Commission is publishing this notice to
solicit comments on the proposed rule change from interested persons.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \1\ 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(1).
    \2\ 17 CFR 240.19b-4.
    \3\ 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(3)(A)(iii).
    \4\ 17 CFR 240.19b-4(f)(6).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

I. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement of the Terms of Substance
of the Proposed Rule Change

    Cboe Exchange, Inc. (the ``Exchange'' or ``Cboe Options'') proposes
to add a held order instruction. The text of the proposed rule change
is provided below.

(additions are italicized; deletions are [bracketed])
* * * * *
Rules of Cboe Exchange, Inc.
* * * * *

Rule 5.6. Order Types, Order Instructions, and Times-in-Force

    (a)-(b) No change.
    (c) Order Instructions. An ``Order Instruction'' is a processing
instruction a User may apply to an order (multiple instructions may
apply to a single order), subject to the restrictions set forth in Rule
6.8(c) with respect to orders and bulk messages submitted through bulk
ports and any other restrictions set forth in the Rules, when entering
it into the System for electronic or open outcry processing and
includes:
* * * * *

Electronic Only

    An ``Electronic Only'' order is an order a User designates for
electronic processing, but does not route to PAR for manual handling if
not eligible for electronic processing.

Held

    A ``held'' order is an order marked ``held'' for which a Floor
Broker's client does not give the Floor Broker discretion as to the
price or time at which such order is to be executed or the order was
received by the Exchange electronically and subsequently routed to a
Floor Broker or PAR Official pursuant to the User's instructions.
* * * * *

Not Held

    A ``not held'' order is an order marked ``not held'', ``take time''
or which bears any qualifying notation giving discretion as to the
price or time at which such order is to be executed. An order entrusted
to a Floor Broker will be considered a not held order, unless
[otherwise specified by a Floor Broker's client]marked ``held'' or the
order was received by the Exchange electronically and subsequently
routed to a Floor Broker or PAR Official pursuant to the User's
instructions. A User may not designate a not held order as Electronic
Only.
* * * * *

Rule 5.70. Availability of Orders

    (a) Pursuant to Rule 5.6(a), the Exchange may make order types,
Order Instructions, and Times-in-Force available on a class basis. The
Exchange may make the following order types, Order Instructions, and
Times-in-Force available for orders submitted in FLEX Options (``FLEX
Orders''):
    (1) No change.
    (2) Order Instructions: All Sessions, Attributable, DAC (except for
FLEX Options with an exercise price that is a percentage of the closing
value of the underlying equity security or index value, as applicable
on the trade date or that is Asian or Cliquet-settled), Direct to PAR,
Electronic Only, Held, Non-Attributable, Not Held, and RTH Only.
* * * * *

Rule 5.83. Availability of Orders

    (a) Simple Orders. Pursuant to Rule 5.6(a), the Exchange may make
order types, Order Instructions, and Times-in-Force available on a
class basis for PAR routing for manual handling (and open outcry
trading). The Exchange may make the following order types, Order
Instructions, and Times-in-Force

available for PAR routing for manual handling (and open outcry
trading):
    (1) No change.
    (2) Order Instructions: AON, Attributable, Compression/PCC, Held,
Minimum Quantity, MTP Modifier, Non-Attributable, Not Held, Penny
Cabinet, RTH Only, and Sub-Penny Cabinet.
    (3) No change.
    (b) Complex Orders. The Exchange may make complex orders, including
security future-option orders, and stock-option orders available for
PAR routing for manual handling. Other than Index Combo orders, which
may be submitted for electronic and open outcry handling, a complex
order with a ratio less than one-to-three (.333) or greater than three-
to-one (3.00) may only be submitted for manual handling and open outcry
trading. The Exchange may make the follow complex order types available
for PAR routing for manual handling (and open outcry trading):
    (1) No change.
    (2) Order Instructions: AON, Attributable, Complex Only,
Compression/PCC, Held, Index Combo, MTP Modifier, Multi-Class Spread,
Non-Attributable, Not Held, RFC, RTH Only, SPX Combo, and stock-option
order.
* * * * *

Rule 5.91. Floor Broker Responsibilities

    (a)-(b) No change.
    (c) Discretionary Transactions.
    (1) An order entrusted to a Floor Broker is considered a not held
order (as set forth in the definition of a ``not held'' order in Rule
5.6(c)) unless the order is marked as held.
* * * * *
    The text of the proposed rule change is also available on the
Exchange's website (http://www.cboe.com/AboutCBOE/CBOELegalRegulatoryHome.aspx), at the Exchange's Office of the
Secretary, and at the Commission's Public Reference Room.

II. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement of the Purpose of, and
Statutory Basis for, the Proposed Rule Change

    In its filing with the Commission, the Exchange included statements
concerning the purpose of and basis for the proposed rule change and
discussed any comments it received on the proposed rule change. The
text of these statements may be examined at the places specified in
Item IV below. The Exchange has prepared summaries, set forth in
sections A, B, and C below, of the most significant aspects of such
statements.

A. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement of the Purpose of, and the
Statutory Basis for, the Proposed Rule Change

1. Purpose
    The Exchange proposes to add a held order instruction. Currently,
Rule 5.6(c) permits the Exchange to offer a not held order
instruction.\5\ A ``not held'' order is an order marked ``not held'',
``take time'' or which bears any qualifying notation giving discretion
as to the price or time at which such order is to be executed.\6\ An
order entrusted to a Floor Broker will be considered a not held order,
unless otherwise specified by a Floor Broker's client or the order was
received by the Exchange electronically and subsequently routed to a
Floor Broker or PAR Official pursuant to the User's instructions.\7\ In
other words, an order received by a Floor Broker is by default a not
held order unless the Floor Broker receives instructions to the
contrary.\8\ Currently, there is no standardized manner in which a User
may specify on an order that the User wants the order to be handled as
held when routed to a Floor Broker.\9\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \5\ Pursuant to Rules 5.70(a)(2) and 5.83(b)(2), the Exchange
may make the not held order instruction available for FLEX open
outcry trading and non-FLEX open outcry trading, respectively.
    \6\ A ``not held'' order generally is one where a customer gives
a Floor Broker discretion in executing the order, both with respect
to the time of execution and the price (though the customer may
specify a limit price), and the Floor Broker works the order over a
period of time to avoid market impact while seeking best execution
of the order.
    \7\ A User may not designate a not held order as Electronic
Only.
    \8\ See Securities Exchange Act Release Nos. 75299 (June 25,
2015), 80 FR 37700 (July 1, 2015) (SR-CBOE-2015-047); and 78110
(June 21, 2016), 81 FR 41626 (June 27, 2016) (SR-CBOE-2016-050).
    \9\ See Cboe Options Regulatory Circular RG15-136 (September 30,
2015). Pursuant to that circular, an order will be considered held
if a client instructs a Floor Broker that the order is held.
However, Cboe's system does not currently capture in electronic form
whether a Floor Broker received such instruction from a client.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    The proposed rule change adopts a held order instruction.
Specifically, the proposed rule change defines a ``held'' order as an
order marked ``held'' for which a Floor Broker's client does not give
the Floor Broker discretion as to the price or time at which such order
is to be executed or the order was received by the Exchange
electronically and subsequently routed to a Floor Broker or PAR
Official pursuant to the User's instructions.\10\ The proposed rule
change makes a corresponding change to the definition of a not held
order in Rule 5.6(c) and Rule 5.91(1)(c) to provide that an order
entrusted to a Floor Broker is considered a not held order (as set
forth in the definition of a ``not held'' order in Rule 5.6(c)) unless
the order is marked as held. The proposed rule change also provides
that the Exchange may make the held order instruction available for
FLEX open outcry trading and non-FLEX open outcry trading, for which
the Exchange may currently make the not held order instruction
available.\11\ The proposed rule change is consistent with current
rules, which permit Users to specify that an order not be handled by a
Floor Broker as ``not held.'' It merely adopts a specified manner in
which an order must be marked to indicate the client for such order
does not wish for a Floor Broker to have price and time discretion with
respect to execution of that order.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \10\ See proposed definition of ``held'' in Rule 5.6(c). Unlike
a not held order, a User may designate a held order as Electronic
Only, as any order sent for electronic execution is consistent with
the definition of held. Therefore, the System will accept a held
Electronic Only order.
    \11\ See proposed Rules 5.70(a)(2) and 5.83(a)(2) and (b)(2),
respectively.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

2. Statutory Basis
    The Exchange believes the proposed rule change is consistent with
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (the ``Act'') and the rules and
regulations thereunder applicable to the Exchange and, in particular,
the requirements of Section 6(b) of the Act.\12\ Specifically, the
Exchange believes the proposed rule change is consistent with the
Section 6(b)(5) \13\ requirements that the rules of an exchange be
designed to prevent fraudulent and manipulative acts and practices, to
promote just and equitable principles of trade, to foster cooperation
and coordination with persons engaged in regulating, clearing,
settling, processing information with respect to, and facilitating
transactions in securities, to remove impediments to and perfect the
mechanism of a free and open market and a national market system, and,
in general, to protect investors and the public interest. Additionally,
the Exchange believes the proposed rule change is consistent with the
Section 6(b)(5) \14\ requirement that the rules of an exchange not be
designed to permit unfair discrimination between customers, issuers,
brokers, or dealers.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \12\ 15 U.S.C. 78f(b).
    \13\ 15 U.S.C. 78f(b)(5).
    \14\ Id.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    In particular, the Exchange believes the proposed rule change will
remove impediments to and perfect the mechanism of a free and open
market and a national market system and protect investors by
eliminating any potential ambiguity regarding how Users may indicate
that they do not

want their orders to be treated as not held by Floor Brokers. The
proposed rule change is consistent with the current not held order
instruction and makes a corresponding held order instruction available.
The proposed rule change is consistent with current Rules, which permit
a User to specify that an order not be handled by a Floor Broker as
``not held'' but do not describe how Users may make such a
specification. The proposed rule change merely adopts a specified
manner in which a client must mark an order to indicate the client does
not wish for a Floor Broker to have price and time discretion with
respect to execution of that order. The proposed rule change to make
the held order instruction available for FLEX open outcry trading and
non-FLEX open outcry trading will benefit investors, as it will permit
the Exchange to make this order instruction available for the same
trading for which the Exchange may currently make the not held order
instruction available. This, as well as other conforming changes
described above, will provide consistency throughout the Rules.\15\ The
proposed rule change is consistent with current rules, which permit
Users to specify that an order not be handled by a Floor Broker as
``not held.''
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \15\ See proposed Rules 5.70(a)(2) and 5.83(a)(2) and (b)(2),
respectively.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    Additionally, the proposed rule change will promote just and
equitable principles of trading by enhancing the Exchange's audit
trail, which will now capture held instructions in a standardized
manner and assist the Exchange's regulatory review of orders executed
in open outcry. The Exchange also believes the proposed rule change is
consistent with Section 6(b)(1) of the Act,\16\ which provides that the
Exchange be organized and have the capacity to be able to carry out the
purposes of the Act and to enforce compliance by the Exchange's TPHs
and persons associated with its TPHs with the Act, the rules and
regulations thereunder, and the rules of the Exchange. With an enhanced
audit trail of orders executed in open outcry, the Exchange believes it
will be able to monitor more comprehensively the trading of these
orders.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \16\ 15 U.S.C. 78f(b)(1).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

B. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement on Burden on Competition

    The Exchange does not believe that the proposed rule change will
impose any burden on competition that is not necessary or appropriate
in furtherance of the purposes of the Act. The proposed rule change is
not intended to address competitive issues, as it relates solely to how
certain orders routed to a Floor Broker on the Exchange's floor for
open outcry trading should be marked. Additionally, as discussed above,
the Exchange believes the proposed rule change will enhance the
Exchange's audit trail with respect to orders executed in open outcry.
    The Exchange does not believe that the proposed rule change will
impose any burden on intramarket competition that is not necessary or
appropriate in furtherance of the purposes of the Act, because the
proposed held order instruction (like the current not held order
instruction) will be available to all Users that route held client
orders to a Floor Broker for open outcry trading on the Exchange's
trading floor. Currently, a held order instruction must be communicated
in some way to a Floor Broker, when applicable, and the proposed rule
change provides a clear, specific, and more streamlined way to do so.
The Exchange does not believe that the proposed rule change will impose
any burden on intermarket competition, as it relates solely to how
orders routed for execution on the Exchange's trading floor should be
marked. Additionally, as noted above, the proposed held order
instruction is merely the converse of the already available not held
order instruction that Users may apply to orders.

C. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement on Comments on the Proposed
Rule Change Received From Members, Participants, or Others

    The Exchange neither solicited nor received comments on the
proposed rule change.

III. Date of Effectiveness of the Proposed Rule Change and Timing for
Commission Action

    Because the foregoing proposed rule change does not: (i)
Significantly affect the protection of investors or the public
interest; (ii) impose any significant burden on competition; and (iii)
become operative for 30 days from the date on which it was filed, or
such shorter time as the Commission may designate, it has become
effective pursuant to Section 19(b)(3)(A) of the Act \17\ and Rule 19b-
4(f)(6) thereunder.\18\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \17\ 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(3)(A).
    \18\ 17 CFR 240.19b-4(f)(6). In addition, Rule 19b-4(f)(6)(iii)
requires a self-regulatory organization to give the Commission
written notice of its intent to file the proposed rule change, along
with a brief description and text of the proposed rule change, at
least five business days prior to the date of filing of the proposed
rule change, or such shorter time as designated by the Commission.
The Exchange has satisfied this requirement.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    A proposed rule change filed pursuant to Rule 19b-4(f)(6) under the
Act \19\ normally does not become operative for 30 days after the date
of its filing. However, Rule 19b-4(f)(6)(iii) \20\ permits the
Commission to designate a shorter time if such action is consistent
with the protection of investors and the public interest. The Exchange
has asked the Commission to waive the 30-day operative delay so that
the proposed rule change may become operative immediately. The Exchange
states that waiver of the operative delay would protect investors and
the public interest by eliminating, as soon as possible, any potential
confusion regarding how a User may indicate that an order is held. The
Exchange further states that the proposed change does not raise any new
or novel issues. For these reasons, the Commission believes that waiver
of the 30-day operative delay is consistent with the protection of
investors and the public interest. Accordingly, the Commission hereby
waives the 30-day operative delay and designates the proposed rule
change operative upon filing.\21\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \19\ 17 CFR 240.19b-4(f)(6).
    \20\ 17 CFR 240.19b-4(f)(6)(iii).
    \21\ For purposes only of waiving the 30-day operative delay,
the Commission also has considered the proposed rule's impact on
efficiency, competition, and capital formation. See 15 U.S.C.
78c(f).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    At any time within 60 days of the filing of the proposed rule
change, the Commission summarily may temporarily suspend such rule
change if it appears to the Commission that such action is necessary or
appropriate in the public interest, for the protection of investors, or
otherwise in furtherance of the purposes of the Act. If the Commission
takes such action, the Commission shall institute proceedings to
determine whether the proposed rule change should be approved or
disapproved.

IV. Solicitation of Comments

    Interested persons are invited to submit written data, views, and
arguments concerning the foregoing, including whether the proposed rule
change is consistent with the Act. Comments may be submitted by any of
the following methods:

Electronic Comments

     Use the Commission's internet comment form (http://www.sec.gov/rules/sro.shtml); or
     Send an email to [email protected]. Please include
File Number SR-CBOE-2021-067 on the subject line.

Paper Comments

     Send paper comments in triplicate to: Secretary,
Securities and Exchange Commission, 100 F Street NE, Washington, DC
20549-1090.

All submissions should refer to File Number SR-CBOE-2021-067. This file
number should be included on the subject line if email is used. To help
the Commission process and review your comments more efficiently,
please use only one method. The Commission will post all comments on
the Commission's internet website (http://www.sec.gov/rules/sro.shtml).
Copies of the submission, all subsequent amendments, all written
statements with respect to the proposed rule change that are filed with
the Commission, and all written communications relating to the proposed
rule change between the Commission and any person, other than those
that may be withheld from the public in accordance with the provisions
of 5 U.S.C. 552, will be available for website viewing and printing in
the Commission's Public Reference Room, 100 F Street NE, Washington, DC
20549 on official business days between the hours of 10:00 a.m. and
3:00 p.m. Copies of the filing also will be available for inspection
and copying at the principal office of the Exchange. All comments
received will be posted without change. Persons submitting comments are
cautioned that we do not redact or edit personal identifying
information from comment submissions. You should submit only
information that you wish to make available publicly. All submissions
should refer to File Number SR-CBOE-2021-067 and should be submitted on
or before December 20, 2021.

    For the Commission, by the Division of Trading and Markets,
pursuant to delegated authority.\22\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \22\ 17 CFR 200.30-3(a)(12).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

J. Matthew DeLesDernier,
Assistant Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2021-25893 Filed 11-26-21; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 8011-01-P


[Federal Register Volume 82, Number 118 (Wednesday, June 21, 2017)]
[Notices]
[Pages 28311-28312]
[FR Doc No: 2017-12928]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission

[Project No. 2114-209]

Public Utility District No. 2 of Grant County, Washington; Notice
of Application Accepted for Filing, Soliciting Comments, Motions To
Intervene, and Protests

    Take notice that the following hydroelectric application has been
filed with the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission and is available
for public inspection:
    a. Application Type: Recreation Plan Update.
    b. Project No: 2114-209.
    c. Date Filed: June 16, 2017.
    d. Applicant: Public Utility District No. 2 of Grant County,
Washington (Grant PUD).
    e. Name of Project: Priest Rapids Hydroelectric Project.
    f. Location: The project is located on the mid-Columbia River in
portions of Grant, Yakima, Kittitas, Douglas, Benton, and Chelan
Counties, Washington.
    g. Filed Pursuant to: Federal Power Act, 16 U.S.C. 791a-825r.
    h. Applicant Contact: Shannon Lowry, Lands and Recreation Resources
Manager, Grant PUD, PO Box 878, Euphrata, WA 98823; phone (509) 754-
5088 ext. 2191 or<EMAIL_ADDRESS>    i. FERC Contact: Mary Karwoski at<PHONE_NUMBER>, or
<EMAIL_ADDRESS>    j. Deadline for filing comments, motions to intervene, and
protests: July 17, 2017.
    The Commission strongly encourages electronic filing. Please file
motions to intervene, protests, and comments using the Commission's
eFiling system at http://www.ferc.gov/docs-filing/efiling.asp.
Commenters can submit brief comments up to 6,000 characters, without
prior registration, using the eComment system at http://www.ferc.gov/docs-filing/ecomment.asp. You must include your name and contact
information at the end of your comments. For assistance, please contact
FERC Online Support at<EMAIL_ADDRESS>(866) 208-3676 (toll
free), or<PHONE_NUMBER> (TTY). In lieu of electronic filing, please
send a paper copy to: Secretary, Federal Energy Regulatory Commission,
888 First Street NE., Washington, DC 20426. The first page of any
filing should include docket number P-2114-209. Comments emailed to
Commission staff are not considered part of the Commission record.
    The Commission's Rules of Practice and Procedure require all
intervenors filing documents with the Commission to serve a copy of
that document on each person whose name appears on the official service
list for the project. Further, if an intervenor files comments or
documents with the Commission relating to the merits of an issue that
may affect the responsibilities of a particular resource agency, they
must also serve a copy of the document on that resource agency.
    k. Description of Request: Grant PUD requests Commission approval
of a proposed recreation plan update for the project. The recreation
plan provides a detailed description of all existing recreation
facilities at the project, goals and objectives for operating and
managing those facilities over the next 12 years, an overview of the
interpretation and education program, and a schedule for monitoring
recreation use. The recreation plan also includes a request to approve
the following amendments: Removal of the Priest Rapids Dam Picnic Area;
reduction of the number of campsites at the Priest Rapids Recreation
Area from 34 to 14; and continued reservation of Airstrip site and
Wanapum Recreation Area potential future development.
    l. Locations of the Application: A copy of the application is
available for inspection and reproduction at the Commission's Public
Reference Room, located at 888 First Street NE., Room 2A, Washington,
DC 20426, or by calling<PHONE_NUMBER>. This filing may also be viewed
on the Commission's Web site at http://www.ferc.gov using the
``eLibrary'' link. Enter the docket number excluding the last three
digits in the docket number field to access the document. You may also
register online at http://www.ferc.gov/docs-filing/esubscription.asp to
be notified via email of new filings and issuances related to this or
other pending projects. For assistance, call 1-866-208-3676 or email
<EMAIL_ADDRESS>for TTY, call<PHONE_NUMBER>. A copy is
also available for inspection and reproduction at the address in item
(h) above. Agencies may obtain copies of the application directly from
the applicant.
    m. Individuals desiring to be included on the Commission's mailing
list should so indicate by writing to the Secretary of the Commission.
    n. Comments, Protests, or Motions to Intervene: Anyone may submit
comments, a protest, or a motion to intervene in accordance with the
requirements of Rules of Practice and Procedure, 18 CFR 385.210, .211,
.214, respectively. In determining the

appropriate action to take, the Commission will consider all protests
or other comments filed, but only those who file a motion to intervene
in accordance with the Commission's Rules may become a party to the
proceeding. Any comments, protests, or motions to intervene must be
received on or before the specified comment date for the particular
application.
    o. Filing and Service of Documents: Any filing must (1) bear in all
capital letters the title COMMENTS, PROTEST, or MOTION TO INTERVENE as
applicable; (2) set forth in the heading the name of the applicant and
the project number of the application to which the filing responds; (3)
furnish the name, address, and telephone number of the person
commenting, protesting or intervening; and (4) otherwise comply with
the requirements of 18 CFR 385.2001 through 385.2005. All comments,
motions to intervene, or protests must set forth their evidentiary
basis. Any filing made by an intervenor must be accompanied by proof of
service on all persons listed in the service list prepared by the
Commission in this proceeding, in accordance with 18 CFR 385.2010.

    Dated: June 15, 2017.
Kimberly D. Bose,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2017-12928 Filed 6-20-17; 8:45 am]
 BILLING CODE 6717-01-P