[Federal Register Volume 86, Number 48 (Monday, March 15, 2021)]
[Proposed Rules]
[Pages 14293-14295]
[FR Doc No: 2021-05153]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION

Federal Aviation Administration

14 CFR Part 71

[Docket No. FAA-2021-0086; Airspace Docket No. 21-AGL-4]
RIN 2120-AA66

Proposed Revocation of V-271 and Amendment of V-285 in the
Vicinity of Manistee, MI

AGENCY: Federal Aviation Administration (FAA), DOT.

ACTION: Notice of proposed rulemaking (NPRM).

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: This action proposes to revoke the Very High Frequency
Omnidirectional Range (VOR) Federal airway V-271 and amend the VOR
Federal airway V-285 in the vicinity of Manistee, MI. The airway
amendments

are necessary due to the planned decommissioning of the VOR portion of
the Manistee, MI, VOR/Distance Measuring Equipment (VOR/DME) that these
airways utilize for navigation guidance. The Manistee VOR is being
decommissioned as part of the FAA's VOR Minimum Operational Network
(MON) program.

DATES: Comments must be received on or before April 29, 2021.

ADDRESSES: Send comments on this proposal to the U.S. Department of
Transportation, Docket Operations, 1200 New Jersey Avenue SE, West
Building Ground Floor, Room W12-140, Washington, DC 20590; telephone:
(800) 647-5527, or<PHONE_NUMBER>. You must identify FAA Docket No.
FAA-2021-0086; Airspace Docket No. 21-AGL-4 at the beginning of your
comments. You may also submit comments through the internet at https://www.regulations.gov.
    FAA Order 7400.11E, Airspace Designations and Reporting Points, and
subsequent amendments can be viewed online at https://www.faa.gov/air_traffic/publications/. For further information, you can contact the
Rules and Regulations Group, Federal Aviation Administration, 800
Independence Avenue SW, Washington, DC 20591; telephone: (202) 267-
8783. The Order is also available for inspection at the National
Archives and Records Administration (NARA). For information on the
availability of FAA Order 7400.11E at NARA, email:
<EMAIL_ADDRESS>or go to https://www.archives.gov/federal-register/cfr/ibr-locations.html.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Jesse Acevedo, Rules and Regulations
Group, Office of Policy, Federal Aviation Administration, 800
Independence Avenue SW, Washington, DC 20591; telephone: (202) 267-
8783.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

Authority for This Rulemaking

    The FAA's authority to issue rules regarding aviation safety is
found in Title 49 of the United States Code. Subtitle I, Section 106
describes the authority of the FAA Administrator. Subtitle VII,
Aviation Programs, describes in more detail the scope of the agency's
authority. This rulemaking is promulgated under the authority described
in Subtitle VII, Part A, Subpart I, Section 40103. Under that section,
the FAA is charged with prescribing regulations to assign the use of
the airspace necessary to ensure the safety of aircraft and the
efficient use of airspace. This regulation is within the scope of that
authority as it would modify the route structure as necessary to
preserve the safe and efficient flow of air traffic within the National
Airspace System (NAS).

Comments Invited

    Interested parties are invited to participate in this proposed
rulemaking by submitting such written data, views, or arguments as they
may desire. Comments that provide the factual basis supporting the
views and suggestions presented are particularly helpful in developing
reasoned regulatory decisions on the proposal. Comments are
specifically invited on the overall regulatory, aeronautical, economic,
environmental, and energy-related aspects of the proposal.
    Communications should identify both docket numbers (FAA Docket No.
FAA-2021-0086; Airspace Docket No. 21-AGL-4) and be submitted in
triplicate to the Docket Management Facility (see ADDRESSES section for
address and phone number). You may also submit comments through the
internet at https://www.regulations.gov.
    Commenters wishing the FAA to acknowledge receipt of their comments
on this action must submit with those comments a self-addressed,
stamped postcard on which the following statement is made: ``Comments
to FAA Docket No. FAA-2021-0086; Airspace Docket No. 21-AGL-4.'' The
postcard will be date/time stamped and returned to the commenter.
    All communications received on or before the specified comment
closing date will be considered before taking action on the proposed
rule. The proposal contained in this action may be changed in light of
comments received. All comments submitted will be available for
examination in the public docket both before and after the comment
closing date. A report summarizing each substantive public contact with
FAA personnel concerned with this rulemaking will be filed in the
docket.

Availability of NPRMs

    An electronic copy of this document may be downloaded through the
internet at https://www.regulations.gov. Recently published rulemaking
documents can also be accessed through the FAA's web page at https://www.faa.gov/air_traffic/publications/airspace_amendments/.
    You may review the public docket containing the proposal, any
comments received and any final disposition in person in the Dockets
Office (see ADDRESSES section for address and phone number) between
9:00 a.m. and 5:00 p.m., Monday through Friday, except Federal
holidays. An informal docket may also be examined during normal
business hours at the office of the Operations Support Group, Central
Service Center, Federal Aviation Administration, 10101 Hillwood
Parkway, Fort Worth, TX 76177.

Availability and Summary of Documents for Incorporation by Reference

    This document proposes to amend FAA Order 7400.11E, Airspace
Designations and Reporting Points, dated July 21, 2020 and effective
September 15, 2020. FAA Order 7400.11E is publicly available as listed
in the ADDRESSES section of this document. FAA Order 7400.11E lists
Class A, B, C, D, and E airspace areas, air traffic service routes, and
reporting points.

Background

    The FAA is planning to decommission the Manistee, MI, VOR. This VOR
was one of the candidate VORs identified for discontinuance by the
FAA's VOR MON program and listed in the Final policy statement notice,
``Provision of Navigation Services for the Next Generation Air
Transportation System (NextGen) Transition to Performance-Based
Navigation (PBN) (Plan for Establishing a VOR Minimum Operational
Network),'' published in the Federal Register of July 26, 2016 (81 FR
48694), Docket No. FAA-2011-1082. The Manistee VOR is scheduled to be
decommissioned on December 2, 2021.
    Although the VOR portion of the Manistee VOR/DME is planned for
decommissioning, the co-located DME portion of the navigational aid is
being retained.
    The VOR Federal airway dependencies to the Manistee VOR are V-271
and V-285. With the planned decommissioning of the Manistee VOR, there
are no remaining navigational aids in the area that would support
continuity of these airways. As such, the proposal would result in V-
271 being revoked and V-285 being shortened with a new end point. To
overcome the loss of V-271 and portions of V-285, instrument flight
rules (IFR) traffic could use adjacent Air Traffic Systems (ATS)
routes, including VOR Federal airways V-26, V-193, V-420 or request air
traffic control (ATC) radar vectors to fly through or navigate around
the affected area. Additionally, IFR pilots equipped with RNAV PBN
could use an existing RNAV route, T-265, or navigate point to point
using the existing fixes that will remain in place to support continued
operations through the affected area. Visual flight rules (VFR)

pilots who elect to navigate via the airways through the affected area
could also take advantage of the adjacent VOR Federal airways or ATC
services listed previously.

The Proposal

    The FAA is proposing an amendment to 14 CFR part 71 to revoke VOR
Federal airway V-271 and amend VOR Federal airways V-285 due to the
planned decommissioning of the Manistee, MI, VOR, in the vicinity of
Manistee, MI. The proposed VOR Federal airway amendments are described
below.
    V-271: V-271 currently extends between the Manistee, MI, VOR/DME
and the Escanaba, MI, VOR/DME. The FAA proposes to revoke the airway.
    V-285: V-285 currently extends between the Brickyard, IN, VOR/
Tactical Air Navigation (VORTAC) and the Traverse City, MI, VOR/DME.
The FAA proposes to delete a portion of the airway between the White
Cloud, MI, VOR/DME and the Traverse City, MI, VOR/DME. The airway would
then terminate at the White Cloud, MI, VOR/DME. The unaffected portions
of the existing airway would remain as charted.
    All radials in the VOR Federal airway descriptions below are
unchanged and stated in True degrees.
    VOR Federal airways are published in paragraph 6010(a) of FAA Order
7400.11E, dated July 21, 2020, and effective September 15, 2020, which
is incorporated by reference in 14 CFR 71.1. The airways listed in this
document would be subsequently updated in the next edition of this
Order.
    FAA Order 7400.11, Airspace Designations and Reporting Points, is
published yearly and effective on September 15.

Regulatory Notices and Analyses

    The FAA has determined that this proposed regulation only involves
an established body of technical regulations for which frequent and
routine amendments are necessary to keep them operationally current.
It, therefore: (1) Is not a ``significant regulatory action'' under
Executive Order 12866; (2) is not a ``significant rule'' under
Department of Transportation (DOT) Regulatory Policies and Procedures
(44 FR 11034; February 26, 1979); and (3) does not warrant preparation
of a regulatory evaluation as the anticipated impact is so minimal.
Since this is a routine matter that will only affect air traffic
procedures and air navigation, it is certified that this proposed rule,
when promulgated, will not have a significant economic impact on a
substantial number of small entities under the criteria of the
Regulatory Flexibility Act.

Environmental Review

    This proposal will be subject to an environmental analysis in
accordance with FAA Order 1050.1F, ``Environmental Impacts: Policies
and Procedures'' prior to any FAA final regulatory action.

List of Subjects in 14 CFR Part 71

    Airspace, Incorporation by reference, Navigation (air).

The Proposed Amendment

    In consideration of the foregoing, the Federal Aviation
Administration proposes to amend 14 CFR part 71 as follows:

PART 71--DESIGNATION OF CLASS A, B, C, D, AND E AIRSPACE AREAS; AIR
TRAFFIC SERVICE ROUTES; AND REPORTING POINTS

0
1. The authority citation for part 71 continues to read as follows:

    Authority: 49 U.S.C. 106(f), 106(g); 40103, 40113, 40120; E.O.
10854, 24 FR 9565, 3 CFR, 1959-1963 Comp., p. 389.

Sec.  71.1  [Amended]

0
2. The incorporation by reference in 14 CFR 71.1 of FAA Order 7400.11E,
Airspace Designations and Reporting Points, dated July 21, 2020, and
effective September 15, 2020, is amended as follows:

Paragraph 6010(a), Domestic VOR Federal Airways.

* * * * *

V-271 [Removed]

* * * * *

V-285 [Amended]

    From Brickyard, IN; Kokomo, IN; Goshen, IN; INT Goshen 038[deg]
and Kalamazoo, MI, 191[deg] radials; Kalamazoo; INT Kalamazoo
014[deg] and Victory, MI, 167[deg] radials; Victory; to White Cloud,
MI.
* * * * *

    Issued in Washington, DC, on March 9, 2021.
George Gonzalez,
Acting Manager, Rules and Regulations Group.
[FR Doc. 2021-05153 Filed 3-12-21; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910-13-P


Comment Info: =================

General Comment:A 75 day comment period is insufficient time for the vaping industry and the wider vaping community to comment on the proposed deeming regulations. I respectfully request that the period for comment be extended to 180 days.

I wish to state that I am stunned that the FDA is proposing to interfere with the right of small businesses to participate in the electronic vaping supply industry.  This is not acceptable in a free enterprise society.  Millions of customers and business owners, most of us ex-smokers attempting to better our lives, are perfectly happy, healthy, and thriving in the current environment, we do not want all keys to the kingdom handed over to mega corporations.  Small businesses care in a way that monoliths cannot.  Any small businesses behaving indecently will be quickly eradicated by the marketplace, which is as it should be.  Competition will create the healthiest market.  Please allow that to happen.


[Federal Register: October 30, 2006 (Volume 71, Number 209)]
[Notices]
[Page 63372-63374]
[DOCID:fr30oc06-140]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

[Release No. 34-54642; File No. SR-CHX-2006-30]

Self-Regulatory Organizations; Chicago Stock Exchange, Inc.;
Notice of Filing of Proposed Rule Change To Permit Routing From the
Matching System to a Destination Selected by a Participant

 October 23, 2006.
    Pursuant to section 19(b)(1) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934
(``Act''),\1\ and Rule 19b-4 thereunder,\2\ notice is hereby given that
on October 19, 2006, the Chicago Stock Exchange, Inc. (``CHX'' or
``Exchange'') filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission
(``Commission'') the proposed rule change as described in Items I, II,
and III below, which Items have been prepared by the CHX. The
Commission is publishing this notice to solicit comments on the
proposed rule change from interested persons.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \1\ 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(1).
    \2\ 17 CFR 240.19b-4.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

I. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement of the Terms of Substance
of the Proposed Rule Change

    The CHX proposes to amend its rules to permit its participants to
identify a destination to which an order should be routed when its
execution would improperly trade through other markets or its display
would improperly lock or cross other markets. The text of the proposed
rule change appears below. Additions are italicized; deletions are
[bracketed].
RULES OF CHICAGO STOCK EXCHANGE, INC.
ARTICLE 20
Prevention of Trade-Throughs
* * * * *
    RULE 5.a. An inbound order for at least a round lot is not eligible
for execution on the Exchange if its execution would cause an improper
trade-through of another ITS market or, when Reg NMS is implemented for
a security, if its execution would be improper under Rule 611 (but not
including the exception set out in Rule 611(b)(8)) (together an
``improper trade-through''). As described in Interpretation and Policy
.03, if the execution of all or part of an inbound order for at least a
round lot on the Exchange would cause an improper trade-through, that
order (or the portion of that order that would cause a trade-through)
shall be routed to another appropriate market or, if designated as ``do
not route,'' automatically cancelled; provided, however, that if an
undisplayed order is resting in the Matching System and the execution
of an inbound round lot order (that is not an IOC or FOK order) against
the undisplayed resting order would cause an improper trade-through,
the resting order shall be cancelled to the extent necessary to allow
the inbound order to be executed or quoted.
    b. Inbound odd lot orders and odd lot crosses shall be eligible for
execution on the Exchange even if the execution would trade through
another market's bid or offer.
    * * * Interpretations and Policies:
* * * * *
    .03 Routing to other markets when execution in Matching System
would cause a trade-through. As described above, an inbound round lot
order is not eligible for execution on the Exchange if its execution
would cause an improper trade-through of another market's quotations.
If the execution of all or a part of an inbound round-lot order on the
Exchange would cause an improper trade-through, that order (or a
portion of that order) shall be routed to another destination or, if
designated as ``do not route,'' automatically cancelled. Routing to
other destinations (``Routing Services'') shall occur as follows:
    a. Cross with satisfy/outbound ISO. If a Participant has submitted
a cross with satisfy or an outbound ISO and its execution would cause
an improper trade-through, the Matching System shall execute that order
and simultaneously route orders or commitments necessary to satisfy the
bids or offers of other markets [(the ``Routing Services'')]. The
Exchange's systems will determine when, how and where these orders (or
commitments) should be routed. These orders will be routed, at the
Participant's election, either through the NMS Linkage System (or any
later linkage that supersedes the NMS Linkage System) or through the
connectivity provided by a routing services provider with whom the
Exchange has negotiated an access agreement.
    b. All other situations. In all other situations, if the execution
of all or a part of an inbound round lot order would cause a trade-
through, and the Participant has not identified the order as ``do not
route,'' the Matching System shall route the order to another venue,
according to each Participant's instructions. The Participant will be
responsible for ensuring that it has a relationship with its chosen
destination to permit the requested access. The Exchange shall not have
responsibility for the handling of the order by the other destination,
but will report any execution or cancellation of the order by the other
destination to the Participant that submitted the order and will notify
the other venue of any cancellations or changes to the order submitted
by the order-sending Participant.
    c [a]. The Exchange will provide its Routing Services pursuant to
the terms of three separate agreements, to the extent that they are
applicable to a specific routing decision: (1) an agreement between the
Exchange and each Participant on whose behalf orders will be routed
(``Participant-Exchange Agreement''); (2) an agreement between each
Participant and a specified third-party broker-dealer that will use its
routing connectivity to other markets and serve as a ``give-up'' in
those markets (``Give-Up Agreement''); and (3) an agreement between the
Exchange and the specified third-party broker-dealer (``Routing
Connectivity Agreement'') pursuant to which the third-party broker-
dealer agrees to provide routing connectivity to other markets and
serve as a ``give-up'' for the Exchange's Participants in other
markets. The Routing Connectivity Agreement will include terms and
conditions that enable the Exchange to comply with this Interpretation
and Policy .03.

    d [b]. The Exchange will provide Routing Services in compliance
with these rules and with the provisions of the Act and the rules
thereunder, including, but not limited to, the requirements of sections
6(b)(4) and (5) of the Act that the rules of a national securities
exchange provide for the equitable allocation of reasonable dues, fees
and other charges among its members and issuers and other persons using
its facilities, and not be designed to permit unfair discrimination
between customers, issuers, brokers or dealers.
    [c. In providing the Routing Services, the Exchange will use its
own systems to determine when, how and where orders (or commitments)
are routed away to other markets.]
    [d. The Routing Connectivity Agreement will include terms and
conditions that enable the Exchange to comply with this Interpretation
and Policy .03.]
    e. The Exchange will establish and maintain procedures and internal
controls reasonably designed to adequately restrict the flow of
confidential and proprietary information between the Exchange
(including its facilities) and the third-party broker-dealer, and, to
the extent the third-party broker-dealer reasonably receives
confidential and proprietary information, that adequately restrict the
use of such information by the third party broker-dealer to legitimate
business purposes necessary to provide routing connectivity and to
serve as a ``give-up.''
    [(In addition to these Routing Services, the Exchange is developing
a functionality that would, in all other situations where the execution
of all or a part of an inbound order for at least a round lot would
cause a trade-through, and the Participant has not identified the order
as ``do not route,'' route all or a part of the order to another
destination, according to each Participant's instructions. This
functionality will only be implemented if these rules are amended to
define the functionality in more detail).]
* * * * *
Locked and Crossed Markets
    RULE 6. a.-c. No change to text.
    d. Matching System operation. Except as permitted in paragraph (c)
above, an order is not eligible for display on the Exchange if its
display would improperly lock or cross the ITS best bid or offer, or,
when Reg NMS is implemented for a security, if its display would lock
or cross a protected quotation. These orders shall be routed, pursuant
to the provisions of Rule 5, Interpretation .03 above, to another
destination of the Participant's choice [appropriate market] or, if
designated as ``do not route,'' automatically cancelled.
* * * * *

II. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement of the Purpose of, and
Statutory Basis for, the Proposed Rule Change

    In its filing with the Commission, the CHX included statements
concerning the purpose of, and basis for, the proposed rule change and
discussed any comments it received on the proposed rule change. The
text of these statements may be examined at the places specified in
Item IV below. The CHX has prepared summaries, set forth in Sections A,
B, and C below, of the most significant aspects of such statements.

A. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement of the Purpose of, and
Statutory Basis for, the Proposed Rule Change

1. Purpose
    Under the Exchange's new trading model rules, the Exchange's
Matching System will not execute an order if its execution would cause
an improper trade-through of another ITS market or, when Regulation NMS
is implemented, if its execution would be improper under Rule 611 of
Regulation NMS \3\ (together an ``improper trade-through'').\4\
Similarly, the Exchange's Matching System will not display an order if
its display would improperly lock or cross other markets.\5\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \3\ 17 CFR 242.611.
    \4\ See CHX Article 20, Rule 5.
    \5\ See CHX Article 20, Rule 6.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    Through this proposal, the Exchange seeks to adopt rules that would
allow the Exchange, in these situations, to either cancel the order
back to the participant that submitted it or to route the order to the
destination of the participant's choice, all at the direction of the
participant. Under this proposal, the participant would be responsible
for ensuring that it has a relationship with its chosen destination to
permit the requested access.\6\ The Exchange would not be involved in
the execution of the order--any execution of the order would be the
responsibility of the destination to which the order was sent. The
Exchange, however, would report any execution or cancellation of the
order by the other destination to the participant that submitted the
order and would notify the other venue of any cancellations or changes
to the order submitted by the order-sending participant.\7\ The
Exchange would provide these routing services pursuant to these
proposed rules and a separate agreement between the Exchange and each
participant on whose behalf orders would be routed.\8\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \6\ See CHX Article 20, Rule 5, proposed Interpretation and
Policy .03(b).
    \7\ See CHX Article 20, Rule 5, proposed Interpretation and
Policy .03(b).
    \8\ See CHX Article 20, Rule 5, proposed Interpretation and
Policy .03(c).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    The Exchange believes that the proposed routing of orders as set
forth above would be a facility of the Exchange, but that the
destinations chosen by each participant would not constitute an
Exchange facility. As a result, the Exchange would submit fee changes,
and any applicable changes to its rules, to the Commission as required
by Rule 19b-4 under the Act in connection with its routing.\9\ The
Exchange's rules and fees, however, would not address the fees or
manner of operation of any destination to which the participant asked
that an order be routed. Additionally, the Exchange would provide these
routing services in compliance with its rules and with the provisions
of the Act and the rules thereunder, including, but not limited to, the
requirements of Sections 6(b)(4) and (5) of the Act,\10\ which require
that the rules of a national securities exchange provide for the
equitable allocation of reasonable dues, fees and other charges among
its members and issuers and other persons using its facilities, and not
be designed to permit unfair discrimination between customers, issuers,
brokers or dealers.\11\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \9\ 17 CFR 240.19b-4.
    \10\ 15 U.S.C. 78f(b)(4)-(5).
    \11\ See CHX Article 20, Rule 5, proposed Interpretation and
Policy .03(d).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

2. Statutory Basis
    The CHX believes that the proposal is consistent with the
requirements of the Act and the rules and regulations thereunder that
are applicable to a national securities exchange, and, in particular,
with the requirements of Section 6(b).\12\ The CHX believes that the
proposal is consistent with Section 6(b)(5) of the Act \13\ in that it
is designed to promote just and equitable principles of trade, to
remove impediments to and perfect the mechanism of, a free and open
market and a national market system, and, in general, to protect
investors and the public interest by confirming that, when the
execution of an order would improperly trade through another market (or
the display of an order would improperly lock or cross another market),
the Exchange may follow a participant's instructions

in either cancelling the order back to the participant or routing the
order to a destination of the participant's choice.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \12\ 15 U.S.C. 78f(b).
    \13\ 15 U.S.C. 78f(b)(5).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

B. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement on Burden on Competition

    The Exchange does not believe that the proposed rule change will
impose any burden on competition.

C. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement on Comments on the Proposed
Rule Change Received From Members, Participants or Others

    No written comments were either solicited or received.

III. Date of Effectiveness of the Proposed Rule Change and Timing for
Commission Action

    Within 35 days of the date of publication of this notice in the
Federal Register or within such longer period (i) as the Commission may
designate up to 90 days of such date if it finds such longer period to
be appropriate and publishes its reasons for so finding or (ii) as to
which the Exchange consents, the Commission will:
    (A) By order approve such proposed rule change, or
    (B) Institute proceedings to determine whether the proposed rule
change should be disapproved.

IV. Solicitation of Comments

    Interested persons are invited to submit written data, views, and
arguments concerning the foregoing, including whether the proposed rule
change is consistent with the Act. Comments may be submitted by any of
the following methods:

Electronic Comments

     Use the Commission's Internet comment form (http://www.sec.gov/rules/sro.shtml.
); or     Send an e-mail to<EMAIL_ADDRESS>Please include

File Number SR-CHX-2006-30 on the subject line.

Paper Comments

     Send paper comments in triplicate to Nancy M. Morris,
Secretary, Securities and Exchange Commission, 100 F Street, NE.,
Washington, DC 20549-1090.
    All submissions should refer to File Number SR-CHX-2006-30. This
file number should be included on the subject line if e-mail is used.
To help the Commission process and review your comments more
efficiently, please use only one method. The Commission will post all
comments on the Commission's Internet Web site (http://www.sec.gov/rules/sro.shtml
). Copies of the submission, all subsequent amendments,

all written statements with respect to the proposed rule change that
are filed with the Commission, and all written communications relating
to the proposed rule change between the Commission and any person,
other than those that may be withheld from the public in accordance
with the provisions of 5 U.S.C. 552, will be available for inspection
and copying in the Commission's Public Reference Room. Copies of the
filing also will be available for inspection and copying at the
principal office of the Exchange. All comments received will be posted
without change; the Commission does not edit personal identifying
information from submissions. You should submit only information that
you wish to make available publicly. All submissions should refer to
File Number SR-CHX-2006-30 and should be submitted on or before
November 20, 2006.

    For the Commission, by the Division of Market Regulation,
pursuant to delegated authority.\14\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \14\ 17 CFR 200.30-3(a)(12).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

Nancy M. Morris,
Secretary.
 [FR Doc. E6-18083 Filed 10-27-06; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 8011-01-P


[Federal Register Volume 85, Number 225 (Friday, November 20, 2020)]
[Notices]
[Pages 74337-74338]
[FR Doc No: 2020-25673]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission

Combined Notice of Filings #1

    Take notice that the Commission received the following exempt
wholesale generator filings:

    Docket Numbers: EG21-36-000.
    Applicants: Central Line Solar, LLC.
    Description: Self-Certification of EG of Central Line Solar, LLC.
    Filed Date: 11/13/20.
    Accession Number: 20201113-5239.
    Comments Due: 5 p.m. ET 12/4/20.

    Take notice that the Commission received the following electric
rate filings:

    Docket Numbers: ER10-2063-003.
    Applicants: Otter Tail Power Company.
    Description: Notice of Non-Material Change in Status of Otter Tail
Power Company.
    Filed Date: 11/13/20.
    Accession Number: 20201113-5226.
    Comments Due: 5 p.m. ET 12/4/20.

    Docket Numbers: ER11-4044-025; ER10-2136-016; ER11-4046-024; ER16-
1720-015.
    Applicants: Gratiot County Wind LLC, Gratiot County Wind II LLC,
Invenergy Cannon Falls LLC, Invenergy Energy Management LLC.
    Description: Notice of Change in Facts of Gratiot County Wind LLC,
et al.
    Filed Date: 11/13/20.
    Accession Number: 20201113-5139.
    Comments Due: 5 p.m. ET 12/4/20.

    Docket Numbers: ER18-1314-008.
    Applicants: PJM Interconnection, L.L.C.
    Description: Compliance filing: Third Compliance in EL16-49 and
EL18-178 MOPR, Motion to Reinstate Certain RPM to be effective 10/15/
2020.
    Filed Date: 11/13/20.
    Accession Number: 20201113-5138.
    Comments Due: 5 p.m. ET 12/4/20.

    Docket Numbers: ER20-2125-000.
    Applicants: WGP Redwood Holdings, LLC.
    Description: Amendment to June 22, 2020 WGP Redwood Holdings, LLC
tariff filing.
    Filed Date: 11/16/20.
    Accession Number: 20201116-5038.
    Comments Due: 5 p.m. ET 11/27/20.

    Docket Numbers: ER20-3036-000; ER20-3037-000.
    Applicants: Vopak Industrial Infrastructure Americas.
    Description: Supplement to September 30, 2020 Vopak Industrial
Infrastructure Americas Plaquemine, LLC, et al.
    Filed Date: 11/13/20.
    Accession Number: 20201113-5242.
    Comments Due: 5 p.m. ET 11/23/20.

    Docket Numbers: ER21-110-000.
    Applicants: Harts Mill TE Holdings LLC.
    Description: Supplement to October 15, 2020 Harts Mill TE Holdings
LLC tariff filing.
    Filed Date: 11/10/20.
    Accession Number: 20201110-5181.
    Comments Due: 5 p.m. ET 11/19/20.

    Docket Numbers: ER21-293-001.

    Applicants: Horizon West Transmission, LLC.
    Description: Tariff Amendment: Horizon West Transmission, LLC
Amendment to Proposed Formula Rate to be effective 1/1/2021.
    Filed Date: 11/13/20.
    Accession Number: 20201113-5107.
    Comments Due: 5 p.m. ET 12/4/20.

    Docket Numbers: ER21-408-000.
    Applicants: Southwest Power Pool, Inc.
    Description: Sec.  205(d) Rate Filing: Basin Electric Power
Cooperative Contract Services Agreement Amendment to be effective 2/1/
2021.
    Filed Date: 11/13/20.
    Accession Number: 20201113-5127.
    Comments Due: 5 p.m. ET 12/4/20.

    Docket Numbers: ER21-409-000.
    Applicants: Mid-Atlantic Interstate Transmission, LLC, PJM
Interconnection, L.L.C.
    Description: Sec.  205(d) Rate Filing: MAIT submits ECSA SA No.
5777 to be effective 1/13/2021.
    Filed Date: 11/13/20.
    Accession Number: 20201113-5130.
    Comments Due: 5 p.m. ET 12/4/20.

    Docket Numbers: ER21-410-000.
    Applicants: Tri-State Generation and Transmission Association, Inc.
    Description: Sec.  205(d) Rate Filing: Revised LGIP and SGIP to be
effective 1/13/2021.
    Filed Date: 11/13/20.
    Accession Number: 20201113-5133.
    Comments Due: 5 p.m. ET 12/4/20.

    Docket Numbers: ER21-411-000.
    Applicants: Southwest Power Pool, Inc.
    Description: Sec.  205(d) Rate Filing: 1892R9 Evergy Kansas
Central, Inc. NITSA NOA--Robinson to be effective 2/1/2021.
    Filed Date: 11/16/20.
    Accession Number: 20201116-5016.
    Comments Due: 5 p.m. ET 12/7/20.

    Docket Numbers: ER21-412-000.
    Applicants: Southwest Power Pool, Inc.
    Description: Sec.  205(d) Rate Filing: 1893R10 Evergy Kansas
Central, Inc. NITSA NOA--Savonburg to be effective 2/1/2021.
    Filed Date: 11/16/20.
    Accession Number: 20201116-5017.
    Comments Due: 5 p.m. ET 12/7/20.

    Docket Numbers: ER21-413-000.
    Applicants: Southwest Power Pool, Inc.
    Description: Sec.  205(d) Rate Filing: 1897R10 Evergy Kansas
Central, Inc. NITSA NOA ? Elwood to be effective 2/1/2021.
    Filed Date: 11/16/20.
    Accession Number: 20201116-5018.
    Comments Due: 5 p.m. ET 12/7/20.

    Docket Numbers: ER21-414-000.
    Applicants: Southwest Power Pool, Inc.
    Description: Sec.  205(d) Rate Filing: 2045R9 Evergy Kansas
Central, Inc. NITSA NOA--Morrill to be effective 2/1/2021.
    Filed Date: 11/16/20.
    Accession Number: 20201116-5037.
    Comments Due: 5 p.m. ET 12/7/20.

    Docket Numbers: ER21-415-000.
    Applicants: Briel Farm Solar, LLC.
    Description: Baseline eTariff Filing: Application for MBR
Authorization and Request for Certain Waivers, et al. to be effective
11/17/2020.
    Filed Date: 11/16/20.
    Accession Number: 20201116-5042.
    Comments Due: 5 p.m. ET 12/7/20.

    Docket Numbers: ER21-416-000.
    Applicants: Stoney Creek Solar LLC.
    Description: Petition for Limited Waiver, et al. of Stoney Creek
Solar LLC.
    Filed Date: 11/13/20.
    Accession Number: 20201113-5258.
    Comments Due: 5 p.m. ET 12/4/20.

    The filings are accessible in the Commission's eLibrary system
(https://elibrary.ferc.gov/idmws/search/fercgensearch.asp) by querying
the docket number.
    Any person desiring to intervene or protest in any of the above
proceedings must file in accordance with Rules 211 and 214 of the
Commission's Regulations (18 CFR 385.211 and 385.214) on or before 5:00
p.m. Eastern time on the specified comment date. Protests may be
considered, but intervention is necessary to become a party to the
proceeding.
    eFiling is encouraged. More detailed information relating to filing
requirements, interventions, protests, service, and qualifying
facilities filings can be found at: http://www.ferc.gov/docs-filing/efiling/filing-req.pdf. For other information, call<PHONE_NUMBER>
(toll free). For TTY, call<PHONE_NUMBER>.

    Dated: November 16, 2020.
Nathaniel J. Davis, Sr.,
Deputy Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2020-25673 Filed 11-19-20; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6717-01-P