[Federal Register Volume 83, Number 222 (Friday, November 16, 2018)]
[Notices]
[Page 57725]
[FR Doc No: 2018-25075]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission

[Project No. 2520-076]

Great Lakes Hydro America, LLC; Notice of Technical Meeting

    a. Date and Time of Meeting: November 28, 2018 at 10:00 a.m.
Eastern Standard Time.
    b. Place: Telephone conference.
    c. FERC Contact: Adam Peer at [email protected], or (202) 502-
8449.
    d. Purpose of Meeting: Commission Staff is hosting a technical
meeting to discuss Endangered Species Act consultation as it relates to
relicensing the Mattaceunk Hydroelectric Project.
    e. A summary of the meeting will be prepared and filed in the
Commission's public file for the project.
    f. All local, state, and federal agencies, Indian tribes, and other
interested parties are invited to participate by phone. Please contact
Adam Peer at [email protected], or<PHONE_NUMBER> by November 26,
2018, to RSVP and to receive specific instructions on how to
participate.

    Dated: November 9, 2018.
Nathaniel J. Davis, Sr.,
Deputy Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2018-25075 Filed 11-15-18; 8:45 am]
 BILLING CODE 6717-01-P


UNITED STATES ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY

WASHINGTON, D.C.  20460

OFFICE OF

CHEMICAL SAFETY AND

POLLUTION PREVENTION

  SEQ CHAPTER \h \r 1 Date:		22-DEC-2010

Subject:	Sulfentrazone – REVISED Acute and Chronic Aggregate Dietary (Food and Drinking Water) Exposure and Risk Assessments for the Section 3 Registration Request to Add New Uses on:  Brassica, Head and Stem, Subgroup 5A; Brassica, Leafy Greens, Subgroup 5B; Melon Subgroup 9A; Fruiting Vegetable, Group 8 and Okra; Pea, Succulent; Flax; Strawberry; Tuberous and Corm Vegetable, Subgroup 1C; and Miscellaneous Fruiting Vegetables.

PC Code:  129081	DP Barcode:  D384090

Decision No.:  388050	Registration Nos:  279-3220 & 279-3189

Petition No.:  7E7308	Regulatory Action:  Amended Section 3

Risk Assessment Type:  Dietary	Case No.:  7231

TXR No.:  NA	CAS No.:  122836-35-5

MRID No.:  NA	40 CFR:  §180.498

From:		Julie L. Van Alstine, MPH, Environmental Health Scientist

		Risk Assessment Branch 1 (RAB1)

		Health Effects Division (HED, 7509P)

Through:	Nancy Dodd, Chemist

		Mohsen Sahafeyan, Chemist

		Dietary Exposure Science Advisory Council (DESAC)

	and

	George F. Kramer, Ph.D., Branch Senior Chemist

		RAB1/HED (7509P)

To:		Barbara Madden RM05

		Registration Division (RD; 7505P)

		and

		Kelly Lowe, Risk Assessor

		RAB1/HED (7509P)

NOTE:  This document supersedes Memo, W. Wassell, 03-APR-2009 (D362644) and Memo, J. Van Alstine, 18-AUG-2010 (D364912).  This assessment has been updated to include revisions to the acute reference dose for females 13-49 years old.

Executive Summary

Acute and chronic aggregate dietary (food and drinking water) exposure and risk assessments were conducted using the Dietary Exposure Evaluation Model - Food Consumption Intake Database (DEEM-FCID(, ver. 2.03).  DEEM-FCID( incorporates food consumption data from the United States Department of Agriculture (USDA) Continuing Surveys of Food Intakes by Individuals (CSFII; 1994-1996 and 1998).  The revised assessment is being conducted in support of new uses on Brassica, head and stem, subgroup 5A; Brassica, leafy greens, subgroup 5B; melon subgroup 9A; fruiting vegetable, group 8 and okra; pea, succulent; flax; strawberry; tuberous and corm vegetable, subgroup 1C; and miscellaneous fruiting vegetables; and changes to the toxicological doses and endpoints for sulfentrazone.

Acute Dietary (Food and Drinking Water) Exposure Results and Characterization

The acute analysis assumed tolerance-level residues for all commodities, 100% crop treated (%CT), and DEEM( (ver. 7.81) default processing factors (as necessary).  The acute analysis also incorporated the drinking water estimates provided by the Environmental Fate and Effects Division (EFED).  The resulting acute food plus water risk estimates are below HED’s level of concern [<100% of the acute population-adjusted dose (aPAD)] at the 95th percentile of the exposure distribution for the U.S. general population (less than 1% aPAD), and all population subgroups.  The aPAD is lower for females 13 to 49 years old.  The population subgroup with the greatest risk was  SEQ CHAPTER \h \r 1  females 13 to 49 years old which utilized less than 3% of the aPAD.

Chronic Dietary (Food and Drinking Water) Exposure Results and Characterization

The chronic analysis assumed tolerance-level residues, 100% CT, and DEEM( (ver. 7.81) default processing factors (as necessary) for all commodities.  The chronic analysis also incorporated the drinking water estimates provided by EFED.  The resulting chronic risk estimates are below HED’s level of concern.  The most highly exposed population subgroup was children 1-2 years old, which utilized less than 4% of the chronic PAD (cPAD).

Cancer Dietary (Food and Drinking Water) Exposure Results and Characterization

A cancer dietary assessment was not conducted because sulfentrazone is classified as “not likely to be carcinogenic to humans.”

I.  Introduction

Dietary risk assessment incorporates both exposure and toxicity of a given pesticide.  For acute and chronic assessments, the risk is expressed as a percentage of a maximum acceptable dose (i.e., the dose which HED has concluded will result in no unreasonable adverse health effects).  This dose is referred to as the PAD.  The PAD is equivalent to a point-of-departure [POD; e.g., no-observable-adverse-effect-level (NOAEL)] divided by the required uncertainty or safety factors.  For acute and non-cancer chronic exposures, HED is concerned when estimated dietary risk exceeds 100% of the PAD.  References which discuss the acute and chronic risk assessments in more detail are available on the EPA/pesticides web site:  “Available Information on Assessing Exposure from Pesticides, A User’s Guide,” 6/21/2000, web link:    HYPERLINK "http://www.epa.gov/fedrgstr/EPA-PEST/2000/July/Day-12/6061.pdf"  http://www.epa.gov/fedrgstr/EPA-PEST/2000/July/Day-12/6061.pdf ; or see SOP 99.6 (8/20/99).

The most recent sulfentrazone dietary exposure assessment was conducted by J. Van Alstine (18-AUG-2010; D364912).

II.  Residue Information

Residues of Concern in Plants and Livestock:  The HED Metabolism Assessment Review Committee (MARC) has determined that the parent compound, sulfentrazone, and the metabolite HMS [N-(2,4-dichloro-5-(4-(difluoromethyl)-4,5-dihydro-3-hydroxymethyl-5-oxo -1H-1,2,4-triazol-yl)phenyl)methanesulfonamide)] are the residues of concern in soybeans, and that sulfentrazone and its metabolites HMS and DMS [(N-2,4- dichloro-5-[4-(difluoromethyl)-4,5-dihydro-5-oxo-1H-1,2,4-triazol-1-yl)p henyl)methanesulfonamide] are the residues of concern in rotational crops (Memo, G. Kramer, 14-JUN-1996; D226434).  HED has concluded that the results of the rotational crop metabolism studies may be translated to support preemergent uses on all types of crops.  Additionally, sulfentrazone and its metabolites HMS and DMS were identified as the residues of concern in meat, milk, poultry, and eggs.  The HED MARC recommended that parent and 3-carboxylic acid sulfentrazone are the residues of concern for the drinking-water assessment (Memo, G. Kramer et al., 10-APR-2003; D288713).  HED continues to consider the given metabolites and degradates to be the residues of concern for risk assessment.

Established/Recommended Tolerances:   SEQ CHAPTER \h \r 1  A tolerance is currently established under 40 CFR §180.498(a)(1) for the combined residues of sulfentrazone and its major metabolite, HMS, in/on soybean seed at 0.05 ppm.  In addition, permanent tolerances are established under 40 CFR §180.498(a)(2) for the combined residues of sulfentrazone and its metabolites HMS and DMS in/on several food commodities; these established tolerances range from 0.15 ppm (various plant commodities) to 0.40 ppm (peanut meal).  Time-limited tolerances for the combined residues of sulfentrazone and its metabolites HMS and DMS have been established under 40 CFR §180.498(b) in connection with Section 18 Emergency Exemptions; these include tolerances for residues in/on bean, succulent-seed without pod (lima bean and cowpea) at 0.1 ppm with a 12/31/07 expiration date, flax seed at 0.20 ppm with a 12/31/10 expiration date, and strawberry at 0.60 ppm with a 12/31/10 expiration date.  Finally, tolerances are established under 40 CFR §180.498(d) for inadvertent and indirect combined residues of sulfentrazone and its metabolites HMS and DMS in/on cereal grain (excluding sweet corn) bran, forage, grain, hay, hulls, stover, and straw at 0.1-0.6 ppm as a result of the application of sulfentrazone to growing crops.

The proposed uses and the submitted data support the establishment of the following tolerances for the combined residues of sulfentrazone and its metabolites HMS and DMS in/on:

Brassica, head and stem, subgroup 5A	0.20 ppm

Brassica, leafy greens, subgroup 5B	0.40 ppm

Melon subgroup 9A	0.15 ppm

Vegetable, fruiting, group 8	0.15 ppm

Okra	0.15 ppm

Pea, succulent	0.15 ppm

Flax	0.15 ppm

Strawberry	0.15 ppm

Vegetable, tuberous and corm, subgroup 1C	0.15 ppm

Cocona	0.15 ppm

Eggplant, African	0.15 ppm

Eggplant, pea	0.15 ppm

Eggplant, scarlet	0.15 ppm

Goji berry	0.15 ppm

Huckleberry, garden	0.15 ppm

Martynia	0.15 ppm

Naranjilla	0.15 ppm

Roselle	0.15 ppm

Sunberry	0.15 ppm

Tomato, bush	0.15 ppm

Tomato, currant	0.15 ppm

Tomato, tree	0.15 ppm

Residues used in the Acute and Chronic Analyses:  These analyses employed tolerance-level residues for all commodities, 100% CT, and DEEM( (ver. 7.81) default processing factors.  The following fruiting vegetables are not listed in DEEM-FCID( and were therefore not included in the chronic assessment:  cocona, African eggplant, pea eggplant, scarlet eggplant, goji berry, garden huckleberry, martynia, naranjilla, roselle, sunberry, bush tomato, and currant tomato.  However, tree tomato is included in DEEM( and was therefore included in the acute and chronic assessments.

III.  Estimated Drinking Water Concentrations

Drinking water residues were incorporated directly into the acute and chronic dietary analyses (“water, direct, all sources” and “water, indirect, all sources”) and were provided by EFED   SEQ CHAPTER \h \r 1 (Memo, 9/15/2009, L. Liu, D366552).  The estimated drinking water concentrations (EDWCs) were Tier 1 estimates for ground water using the SCI-GROW Model (Screening Concentration In Ground Water) and surface water using the FIRST Model [Food Quality Protection Act (FQPA) Index Reservoir Screening Tool] for sulfentrazone and its major degradate, 3-carboxylic acid sulfentrazone.  The EDWCs were based on the use of sulfentrazone on sugarcane, cabbage, potatoes, mint, or horseradish.

For surface water, the acute (peak) sulfentrazone value is 32.0 ppb and the annual average value ranges from 0.5 ppb in alkaline or neutral waters (most common) to 5.1 ppb in acidic waters.  The groundwater screening sulfentrazone concentration is 15.7 ppb.  For 3-carboxylic acid sulfentrazone, the acute peak is 3.8 ppb and the annual average is 2.7 ppb. For 3-carboxylic acid sulfentrazone in groundwater, the concentration is 10.3 ppb.  These values generally represent upper-bound conservative estimates of the total residue concentrations that might be found in surface water and groundwater due to the use of sulfentrazone on sugarcane, cabbage, potatoes, mint, or horseradish.  These crops were chosen for this assessment because the label permits use of the maximum application rate (0.375 lb ai/A) and aerial application.  Aerial application has the potential for most spray drift and is not compatible with incorporation which would reduce surface water concentration values.  EDWCs of 0.0358 ppm and 0.026 ppm were used in the acute and chronic analyses, respectively.

  SEQ CHAPTER \h \r 1

Table 1.  Estimated Tier 1 Concentrations of Sulfentrazone and 3-Carboxylic Acid Sulfentrazone in Drinking Water Due to the Use of Sulfentrazone on Sugarcane, Cabbage, Potatoes, Mint, or Horseradish1.  SEQ CHAPTER \h \r 1

Chemical	Surface Water (ug/L)	Groundwater (ug/L)

	Acute	Chronic	Acute and Chronic

Sulfentrazone	32.0	5.1	15.7

3-Carboxylic Acid Sulfentrazone	3.8	2.7	10.3

Total	35.8	7.8	26.0

1 These crops were chosen for this assessment because the label permits use of the maximum application rate (0.375 pounds active ingredient per acre) and aerial application.

IV.  DEEM-FCID( Program and Consumption Information

Sulfentrazone acute and chronic dietary exposure and risk assessments were conducted using DEEM-FCID( (Ver. 2.03), which incorporates consumption data from USDA’s CSFII, (1994-1996 and 1998 data).  The 1994-1996, 1998 data are based on the reported consumption of more than 20,000 individuals over two non-consecutive survey days.  Foods “as consumed” (e.g., apple pie) are linked to EPA-defined food commodities (e.g., apples, peeled fruit - cooked; fresh or N/S; baked; or wheat flour - cooked; fresh or N/S, baked) using publicly available recipe translation files developed jointly by USDA/ARS and EPA.  For chronic exposure assessment, consumption data are averaged for the entire U.S. population and within population subgroups, but for acute exposure assessment are retained as individual consumption events.  Based on analysis of the 1994-96, 98 CSFII consumption data, which took into account dietary patterns and survey respondents, HED concluded that it is most appropriate to report risk for the following population subgroups: the general U.S. population, all infants (<1 year old), children 1-2 years old, children 3-5 years old, children 6-12 years old, youth 13-19 years old, adults 20-49 years old, females 13-49 years old, and adults 50+ years old.

For chronic dietary exposure assessment, an estimate of the residue level in each food or food-form (e.g., orange or orange juice) on the food commodity residue list is multiplied by the average daily consumption estimate for that food/food form to produce a residue intake estimate.  The resulting residue intake estimate for each food/food form is summed with the residue intake estimates for all other food/food forms on the commodity residue list to arrive at the total average estimated exposure.  Exposure is expressed in mg/kg body weight/day and as a percent of the cPAD.  This procedure is performed for each population subgroup.

For acute exposure assessments, individual one-day food consumption data are used on an individual-by-individual basis.  The reported consumption amounts of each food item can be multiplied by a residue point estimate and summed to obtain a total daily pesticide exposure for a deterministic exposure assessment, or “matched” in multiple random pairings with residue values and then summed in a probabilistic assessment.  The resulting distribution of exposures is expressed as a percentage of the aPAD on both a user (i.e., only those who reported eating relevant commodities/food forms) and a per-capita (i.e., those who reported eating the relevant commodities as well as those who did not) basis.  In accordance with HED policy, per capita exposure and risk are reported for all tiers of analysis.  However, for Tiers 1 and 2, any significant differences in user vs. per capita exposure and risk are specifically identified and noted in the risk assessment.

V.  Toxicological Information

The RAB1 toxicologists have reevaluated the sulfentrazone database and updated the endpoints as necessary.  The toxicological endpoints selected for sulfentrazone are summarized below in Table 2.

Table 2.  Summary of Toxicological Doses and Endpoints for Sulfentrazone for Use in Human-Health Risk Assessments.

Exposure

Scenario

Point of Departure

Uncertainty/

FQPA Safety Factors

RfD, PAD, Level of Concern for Risk Assessment

Study and Relevant Toxicological Effects

Acute Dietary

(Females 13-49)	NOAEL = 14 mg/kg/day	UFA = 10X

UFH = 10X

FQPA SF = 1X	aRfD = aPAD = 0.14 mg/kg/day

	2-Gen Reproductive Toxicity Study - Rat

Offspring Toxicity LOAEL= 33 (M) and 40 (F) mg/kg/day based on reduced prenatal viability (fetal & litter), reduced litter size, increased no. of stillborn pups, reduced pup and litter postnatal survival and decreased pup body weights throughout lactation.

Acute Dietary

(General population

including infants

and children)	NOAEL = 250 mg/kg/day

	UFA = 10X

UFH = 10X

FQPA SF = 1X	aRfD =aPAD = 2.5 mg/kg/day	Acute-Neurotoxicity Study - Rat

LOAEL = 750 mg/kg/day based on increased incidence of clinical signs and FOB parameters and decreased motor activity.

Chronic Dietary

(all populations)	NOAEL= 10 mg/kg/day 	UFA = 10X

UFH = 10X

FQPA SF = 1X	cRfD = cPAD =

0.10 mg/kg/day

	Prenatal Developmental Toxicity - Rat

Developmental LOAEL = 25 mg/kg/day, based upon decreased mean fetal weights, and retardation in skeletal development evidenced by an increased number of litters with any variation and by decreased number of caudal vertebral and metacarpal ossification sites.

Cancer (oral, dermal, inhalation)

Classification: sulfentrazone is classified as “not likely to be carcinogenic to humans.”

NOAEL = no-observed adverse-effect level.  LOAEL = lowest-observed adverse-effect level.  UF = uncertainty factor.  UFA = extrapolation from animal to human (interspecies).  UFH = potential variation in sensitivity among members of the human population (intraspecies).  UFL = extrapolation for use of a LOAEL in the absence of a NOAEL.  FQPA SF = FQPA Safety Factor.  PAD = population-adjusted dose (a = acute, c = chronic).  RfD = reference dose.  MOE = margin of exposure, LOC = level of concern.

VI.  Results/Discussion

Acute and chronic analyses were performed using DEEM-FCID( (ver. 2.03).  DEEM-FCID( estimates the dietary exposure and risk of the U.S. population and various population subgroups.  The results reported are for the general U.S. Population, all infants (<1 year old), children 1-2 years old, children 3-5 years old, children 6-12 years old, youth 13-19 years old, females 13-49 years old, adults 20-49 years old, and adults 50+ years old.

The resulting acute food plus water risk estimates are below HED’s level of concern (<100% aPAD) at the 95th percentile of the exposure distribution for the general U.S. population (less than 1% aPAD), and all population subgroups; the population subgroup with the greatest risk was females 13 to 49 years, which utilized less than 3% of the aPAD.  See Table 3 below for a summary of the results of the acute assessment.  The resulting chronic risk estimates are also below HED’s level of concern.  The most highly exposed population was children 1-2 years old which utilized less than 4% of the cPAD.  See Table 4 below for a summary of the results of the chronic assessment.

Table 3.  Summary of Acute Dietary Exposure and Risk for Sulfentrazone at the 95th Percentile.1

Population Subgroup	aPAD (mg/kg/day)	Exposure (mg/kg/day)	%aPAD

General U.S. Population	2.5	0.004347     	<1.0

All Infants (< 1 year old)

0.009388     	<1.0

Children 1-2 years old

0.008187     	<1.0

Children 3-5 years old

0.007476     	<1.0

Children 6-12 years old

0.005284     	<1.0

Youth 13-19 years old

0.003695     	<1.0

Adults 20-49 years old

0.003341     	<1.0

Adults 50+ years old

0.002942     	<1.0

Females 13-49 years old	0.14	0.003256	2.3

1 The population with the greatest risk is bolded.

Table 4.  Summary of Chronic Dietary Exposure and Risk for Sulfentrazone.1

Population Subgroup	cPAD (mg/kg/day)	Exposure (mg/kg/day)	%cPAD

General U.S. Population	0.10	0.001751                 	1.8

All Infants (< 1 year old)

0.003117                 	3.1

Children 1-2 years old

0.003565                 	3.6

Children 3-5 years old

0.003463                 	3.5

Children 6-12 years old

0.002404                 	2.4

Youth 13-19 years old

0.001660                 	1.7

Adults 20-49 years old

0.001492                 	1.5

Adults 50+ years old

0.001360                 	1.4

Females 13-49 years old

0.001451                 	1.5

1 The population with the greatest risk is bolded.

VII.  Characterization of Inputs/Outputs

The unrefined acute and chronic analyses assumed tolerance-level residues for all commodities, 100% CT, and DEEM( (ver. 7.81) default processing factors (as necessary).  These analyses are considered conservative and could be refined through the use of anticipated-residue estimates (ARs) for all commodities, %CT data for registered commodities, and empirical processing factors.

VIII.  Conclusions

The acute and chronic dietary exposure and risk estimates for sulfentrazone are below HED’s level of concern.  For food and drinking water acute exposure, the population subgroup with the greatest risk was females 13 to 49 years old, which utilized less than 3% of the aPAD.  SEQ CHAPTER \h \r 1

For food and drinking water chronic exposure, the most highly-exposed population subgroup was children 1-2 years old, which utilized less than 4% of the cPAD.  The acute and chronic dietary exposure assessments support the new uses proposed for sulfentrazone.

Attachments

Attachment 1:  DEEM-FCID( Acute Residue File.

Attachment 2:  DEEM-FCID( Acute Exposure Estimates for the General Population Including Infants and Children.

Attachment 3:  DEEM-FCID( Chronic Residue File.

Attachment 4:  DEEM-FCID( Chronic Exposure Estimates.

RDI:  DE SAC Reviewers:  19-NOV-2010; G. Kramer 17-NOV-2010

DP No.:  D384090

Petition No.:  7E7308

PC Code:  129081

J. L. Van Alstine:S-10951:Potomac Yard:703-603-8866:7509P:RAB1

Attachment 1:  DEEM-FCID( Acute Residue File.

Filename: C:\Documents and Settings\jlangsda\My Documents\Chemicals\Sulfentrazone\November 2010\Sent to Reviewers\129081-acute-2009-jml__01 DEC 2010.R98

Chemical: Sulfentrazone

RfD(Chronic): .1 mg/kg bw/day  NOEL(Chronic): 0 mg/kg bw/day

RfD(Acute): 2.5 mg/kg bw/day  NOEL(Acute):  0 mg/kg bw/day

Date created/last modified: 12-01-2010/09:50:36/8          Program ver. 2.03

------------------------------------------------------------------------ --------

  EPA    Crop                                   Def Res     Adj.Factors   Comment

  Code    Grp  Commodity Name                    (ppm)       #1    #2

-------- ---- -------------------------------  ----------  ------ ------  -------

01011900 1AB  Horseradish                        0.200000   1.000  1.000  1E0631

          Full comment: 1E06311; TLT 0.10 ppm, exp. 12/31/05

01030150 1CD  Arrowroot, flour                   0.150000   1.000  1.000

01030151 1CD  Arrowroot, flour-babyfood          0.150000   1.000  1.000

01030170 1CD  Artichoke, Jerusalem               0.150000   1.000  1.000

01030820 1CD  Cassava                            0.150000   1.000  1.000

01030821 1CD  Cassava-babyfood                   0.150000   1.000  1.000

01031390 1CD  Dasheen, corm                      0.150000   1.000  1.000

01031660 1CD  Ginger                             0.150000   1.000  1.000

01031661 1CD  Ginger-babyfood                    0.150000   1.000  1.000

01031670 1CD  Ginger, dried                      0.150000   1.000  1.000

01032960 1C   Potato, chips                      0.150000   1.000  1.000

01032970 1C   Potato, dry (granules/ flakes)     0.150000   6.500  1.000

01032971 1C   Potato, dry (granules/ flakes)-b   0.150000   6.500  1.000

01032980 1C   Potato, flour                      0.150000   6.500  1.000

01032981 1C   Potato, flour-babyfood             0.150000   6.500  1.000

01032990 1C   Potato, tuber, w/peel              0.150000   1.000  1.000

01032991 1C   Potato, tuber, w/peel-babyfood     0.150000   1.000  1.000

01033000 1C   Potato, tuber, w/o peel            0.150000   1.000  1.000

01033001 1C   Potato, tuber, w/o peel-babyfood   0.150000   1.000  1.000

01033660 1CD  Sweet potato                       0.150000   1.000  1.000

01033661 1CD  Sweet potato-babyfood              0.150000   1.000  1.000

01033710 1CD  Tanier, corm                       0.150000   1.000  1.000

01033870 1CD  Turmeric                           0.150000   1.000  1.000

01034060 1CD  Yam, true                          0.150000   1.000  1.000

01034070 1CD  Yam bean                           0.150000   1.000  1.000

05010610 5A   Broccoli                           0.200000   1.000  1.000

05010611 5A   Broccoli-babyfood                  0.200000   1.000  1.000

05010620 5A   Broccoli, Chinese                  0.200000   1.000  1.000

05010640 5A   Brussels sprouts                   0.200000   1.000  1.000

05010690 5A   Cabbage                            0.200000   1.000  1.000  1E0631

          Full comment: 1E06311

05010710 5A   Cabbage, Chinese, napa             0.200000   1.000  1.000  1E0631

          Full comment: 1E06311

05010720 5A   Cabbage, Chinese, mustard          0.200000   1.000  1.000  1E0631

          Full comment: 1E06311

05010830 5A   Cauliflower                        0.200000   1.000  1.000

05011960 5A   Kohlrabi                           0.200000   1.000  1.000

05020630 5B   Broccoli raab                      0.400000   1.000  1.000

05020700 5B   Cabbage, Chinese, bok choy         0.400000   1.000  1.000  1E0631

          Full comment: 1E06311

05021170 5B   Collards                           0.400000   1.000  1.000

05021940 5B   Kale                               0.400000   1.000  1.000

05022290 5B   Mustard greens                     0.400000   1.000  1.000

05023180 5B   Rape greens                        0.400000   1.000  1.000

05023890 5B   Turnip, greens                     0.400000   1.000  1.000

06003470 6    Soybean, seed                      0.050000   1.000  1.000

06003480 6    Soybean, flour                     0.050000   1.000  1.000

06003481 6    Soybean, flour-babyfood            0.050000   1.000  1.000

06003490 6    Soybean, soy milk                  0.050000   1.000  1.000

06003491 6    Soybean, soy milk-babyfood or in   0.050000   1.000  1.000

06003500 6    Soybean, oil                       0.050000   1.000  1.000

06003501 6    Soybean, oil-babyfood              0.050000   1.000  1.000

06010430 6A   Bean, snap, succulent              0.150000   1.000  1.000

06010431 6A   Bean, snap, succulent-babyfood     0.150000   1.000  1.000

06012570 6A   Pea, edible podded, succulent      0.150000   1.000  1.000

06020310 6B   Bean, broad, succulent             0.150000   1.000  1.000

06020330 6B   Bean, cowpea, succulent            0.100000   1.000  1.000  TLT, e

          Full comment: TLT, exp. 12/31/04

06020370 6B   Bean, lima, succulent              0.150000   1.000  1.000

06022550 6B   Pea, succulent                     0.150000   1.000  1.000

06022551 6B   Pea, succulent-babyfood            0.150000   1.000  1.000

06022590 6B   Pea, pigeon, succulent             0.150000   1.000  1.000

06030300 6C   Bean, black, seed                  0.150000   1.000  1.000  2F0639

          Full comment: 2F06391

06030320 6C   Bean, broad, seed                  0.150000   1.000  1.000  2F0639

          Full comment: 2F06391

06030340 6C   Bean, cowpea, seed                 0.150000   1.000  1.000  2F0639

          Full comment: 2F06391

06030350 6C   Bean,  great northern, seed        0.150000   1.000  1.000  2F0639

          Full comment: 2F06391

06030360 6C   Bean, kidney, seed                 0.150000   1.000  1.000  2F0639

          Full comment: 2F06391

06030380 6C   Bean, lima, seed                   0.150000   1.000  1.000  2F0639

          Full comment: 2F06391

06030390 6C   Bean, mung, seed                   0.150000   1.000  1.000  2F0639

          Full comment: 2F06391

06030400 6C   Bean, navy, seed                   0.150000   1.000  1.000  2F0639

          Full comment: 2F06391

06030410 6C   Bean, pink, seed                   0.150000   1.000  1.000  2F0639

          Full comment: 2F06391

06030420 6C   Bean, pinto, seed                  0.150000   1.000  1.000  2F0639

          Full comment: 2F06391

06030980 6C   Chickpea, seed                     0.150000   1.000  1.000  2F0639

          Full comment: 2F06391

06030981 6C   Chickpea, seed-babyfood            0.150000   1.000  1.000  2F0639

          Full comment: 2F06391

06030990 6C   Chickpea, flour                    0.150000   1.000  1.000  2F0639

          Full comment: 2F06391

06031820 6C   Guar, seed                         0.150000   1.000  1.000  2F0639

          Full comment: 2F06391

06031821 6C   Guar, seed-babyfood                0.150000   1.000  1.000  2F0639

          Full comment: 2F06391

06032030 6C   Lentil, seed                       0.150000   1.000  1.000  2F0639

          Full comment: 2F06391

06032560 6C   Pea, dry                           0.150000   1.000  1.000  2F0639

          Full comment: 2F06391

06032561 6C   Pea, dry-babyfood                  0.150000   1.000  1.000  2F0639

          Full comment: 2F06391

06032580 6C   Pea, pigeon, seed                  0.150000   1.000  1.000  2F0639

          Full comment: 2F06391

08001480 8    Eggplant                           0.150000   1.000  1.000

08002340 8    Okra                               0.150000   1.000  1.000

08002700 8    Pepper, bell                       0.150000   1.000  1.000

08002701 8    Pepper, bell-babyfood              0.150000   1.000  1.000

08002710 8    Pepper, bell, dried                0.150000   1.000  1.000

08002711 8    Pepper, bell, dried-babyfood       0.150000   1.000  1.000

08002720 8    Pepper, nonbell                    0.150000   1.000  1.000  New, S

          Full comment: New, Section 18

08002721 8    Pepper, nonbell-babyfood           0.150000   1.000  1.000  New, S

          Full comment: New, Section 18

08002730 8    Pepper, nonbell, dried             0.150000   1.000  1.000  New, S

          Full comment: New, Section 18

08003740 8    Tomatillo                          0.150000   1.000  1.000

08003750 8    Tomato                             0.150000   1.000  1.000

08003751 8    Tomato-babyfood                    0.150000   1.000  1.000

08003760 8    Tomato, paste                      0.150000   5.400  1.000

08003761 8    Tomato, paste-babyfood             0.150000   5.400  1.000

08003770 8    Tomato, puree                      0.150000   3.300  1.000

08003771 8    Tomato, puree-babyfood             0.150000   3.300  1.000

08003780 8    Tomato, dried                      0.150000  14.300  1.000

08003781 8    Tomato, dried-babyfood             0.150000  14.300  1.000

08003790 8    Tomato, juice                      0.150000   1.500  1.000

09010750 9A   Cantaloupe                         0.150000   1.000  1.000

09010800 9A   Casaba                             0.150000   1.000  1.000

09011870 9A   Honeydew melon                     0.150000   1.000  1.000

09013990 9A   Watermelon                         0.150000   1.000  1.000

09014000 9A   Watermelon, juice                  0.150000   1.000  1.000

15000250 15   Barley, pearled barley             0.100000   1.000  1.000  Inadve

          Full comment: Inadvertent tol.

15000251 15   Barley, pearled barley-babyfood    0.100000   1.000  1.000  Inadve

          Full comment: Inadvertent tol.

15000260 15   Barley, flour                      0.100000   1.000  1.000  Inadve

          Full comment: Inadvertent tol.

15000261 15   Barley, flour-babyfood             0.100000   1.000  1.000  Inadve

          Full comment: Inadvertent tol.

15000270 15   Barley, bran                       0.150000   1.000  1.000  Inadve

          Full comment: Inadvertent tol.

15000650 15   Buckwheat                          0.100000   1.000  1.000  Inadve

          Full comment: Inadvertent tol.

15000660 15   Buckwheat, flour                   0.100000   1.000  1.000  Inadve

          Full comment: Inadvertent tol.

15001200 15   Corn, field, flour                 0.150000   1.000  1.000  2F0639

          Full comment: 2F06391

15001201 15   Corn, field, flour-babyfood        0.150000   1.000  1.000  2F0639

          Full comment: 2F06391

15001210 15   Corn, field, meal                  0.150000   1.000  1.000  2F0639

          Full comment: 2F06391

15001211 15   Corn, field, meal-babyfood         0.150000   1.000  1.000  2F0639

          Full comment: 2F06391

15001220 15   Corn, field, bran                  0.150000   1.000  1.000  Inadve

          Full comment: Inadvertent tol.

15001230 15   Corn, field, starch                0.150000   1.000  1.000  2F0639

          Full comment: 2F06391

15001231 15   Corn, field, starch-babyfood       0.150000   1.000  1.000  2F0639

          Full comment: 2F06391

15001240 15   Corn, field, syrup                 0.150000   1.500  1.000  2F0639

          Full comment: 2F06391

15001241 15   Corn, field, syrup-babyfood        0.150000   1.500  1.000  2F0639

          Full comment: 2F06391

15001250 15   Corn, field, oil                   0.150000   1.000  1.000  2F0639

          Full comment: 2F06391

15001251 15   Corn, field, oil-babyfood          0.150000   1.000  1.000  2F0639

          Full comment: 2F06391

15001260 15   Corn, pop                          0.100000   1.000  1.000  2F0639

          Full comment: 2F06391

15002260 15   Millet, grain                      0.100000   1.000  1.000  Inadve

          Full comment: Inadvertent tol.

15002310 15   Oat, bran                          0.150000   1.000  1.000  Inadve

          Full comment: Inadvertent tol.

15002320 15   Oat, flour                         0.100000   1.000  1.000  Inadve

          Full comment: Inadvertent tol.

15002321 15   Oat, flour-babyfood                0.100000   1.000  1.000  Inadve

          Full comment: Inadvertent tol.

15002330 15   Oat, groats/rolled oats            0.100000   1.000  1.000  Inadve

          Full comment: Inadvertent tol.

15002331 15   Oat, groats/rolled oats-babyfood   0.100000   1.000  1.000  Inadve

          Full comment: Inadvertent tol.

15003230 15   Rice, white                        0.100000   1.000  1.000  Inadve

          Full comment: Inadvertent tol.

15003231 15   Rice, white-babyfood               0.100000   1.000  1.000  Inadve

          Full comment: Inadvertent tol.

15003240 15   Rice, brown                        0.100000   1.000  1.000  Inadve

          Full comment: Inadvertent tol.

15003241 15   Rice, brown-babyfood               0.100000   1.000  1.000  Inadve

          Full comment: Inadvertent tol.

15003250 15   Rice, flour                        0.100000   1.000  1.000  Inadve

          Full comment: Inadvertent tol.

15003251 15   Rice, flour-babyfood               0.100000   1.000  1.000  Inadve

          Full comment: Inadvertent tol.

15003260 15   Rice, bran                         0.150000   1.000  1.000  Inadve

          Full comment: Inadvertent tol.

15003261 15   Rice, bran-babyfood                0.150000   1.000  1.000  Inadve

          Full comment: Inadvertent tol.

15003280 15   Rye, grain                         0.100000   1.000  1.000  Inadve

          Full comment: Inadvertent tol.

15003290 15   Rye, flour                         0.100000   1.000  1.000  Inadve

          Full comment: Inadvertent tol.

15003440 15   Sorghum, grain                     0.100000   1.000  1.000  Inadve

          Full comment: Inadvertent tol.

15003450 15   Sorghum, syrup                     0.100000   1.000  1.000  Inadve

          Full comment: Inadvertent tol.

15003810 15   Triticale, flour                   0.100000   1.000  1.000  Inadve

          Full comment: Inadvertent tol.

15003811 15   Triticale, flour-babyfood          0.100000   1.000  1.000  Inadve

          Full comment: Inadvertent tol.

15004010 15   Wheat, grain                       0.100000   1.000  1.000  Inadve

          Full comment: Inadvertent tol.

15004011 15   Wheat, grain-babyfood              0.100000   1.000  1.000  Inadve

          Full comment: Inadvertent tol.

15004020 15   Wheat, flour                       0.100000   1.000  1.000  Inadve

          Full comment: Inadvertent tol.

15004021 15   Wheat, flour-babyfood              0.100000   1.000  1.000  Inadve

          Full comment: Inadvertent tol.

15004030 15   Wheat, germ                        0.100000   1.000  1.000  Inadve

          Full comment: Inadvertent tol.

15004040 15   Wheat, bran                        0.150000   1.000  1.000  Inadve

          Full comment: Inadvertent tol.

15004050 15   Wild rice                          0.100000   1.000  1.000  Inadve

          Full comment: Inadvertent tol.

20001630 20   Flaxseed, oil                      0.150000   1.000  1.000

20003640 20   Sunflower, seed                    0.200000   1.000  1.000

20003650 20   Sunflower, oil                     0.200000   1.000  1.000

20003651 20   Sunflower, oil-babyfood            0.200000   1.000  1.000

86010000 O    Water, direct, all sources         0.035800   1.000  1.000

86020000 O    Water, indirect, all sources       0.035800   1.000  1.000

95000190 O    Asparagus                          0.150000   1.000  1.000  2E0650

          Full comment: 2E06500

95002630 O    Peanut                             0.200000   1.000  1.000  0F0611

          Full comment: 0F06116

95002640 O    Peanut, butter                     0.200000   1.890  1.000  0F0611

          Full comment: 0F06116

95002650 O    Peanut, oil                        0.200000   1.000  1.000  0F0611

          Full comment: 0F06116

95002750 O    Peppermint                         0.300000   1.000  1.000  1E0631

          Full comment: 1E06311

95002760 O    Peppermint, oil                    0.300000   1.000  1.000  1E0631

          Full comment: 1E06311

95003520 O    Spearmint                          0.300000   1.000  1.000  1E0631

          Full comment: 1E06311

95003530 O    Spearmint, oil                     0.300000   1.000  1.000  1E0631

          Full comment: 1E06311

95003590 O    Strawberry                         0.150000   1.000  1.000

95003591 O    Strawberry-babyfood                0.150000   1.000  1.000

95003600 O    Strawberry, juice                  0.150000   1.000  1.000

95003601 O    Strawberry, juice-babyfood         0.150000   1.000  1.000

95003620 O    Sugarcane, sugar                   0.150000   1.000  1.000

95003621 O    Sugarcane, sugar-babyfood          0.150000   1.000  1.000

95003630 O    Sugarcane, molasses                0.200000   1.000  1.000

95003631 O    Sugarcane, molasses-babyfood       0.200000   1.000  1.000

95003800 O    Tomato, Tree                       0.150000   1.000  1.000

Attachment 2:  DEEM-FCID( Acute Exposure Estimates for the General Population including Infants and Children.1

U.S. Environmental Protection Agency                                  Ver. 2.02

DEEM-FCID ACUTE Analysis for SULFENTRAZONE                       (1994-98 data)

Residue file: 129081-acute-2009-jml__01 DEC 2010.R98

    Adjustment factor #2 used.

Analysis Date: 12-01-2010/09:52:09    Residue file dated: 12-01-2010/09:50:36/8

Daily totals for food and foodform consumption used.

Run Comment: ""

======================================================================== =======

Summary calculations (per capita):

                    95th Percentile      99th Percentile      99.9th Percentile

                   Exposure   % aRfD    Exposure   % aRfD    Exposure   % aRfD

                  ---------- --------  ---------- --------  ---------- --------

U.S. Population:

                    0.004347     0.17    0.007110     0.28    0.011882     0.48

All infants:

                    0.009388     0.38    0.013235     0.53    0.020709     0.83

Children 1-2 yrs:

                    0.008187     0.33    0.011436     0.46    0.018298     0.73

Children 3-5 yrs:

                    0.007476     0.30    0.010856     0.43    0.017357     0.69

Children 6-12 yrs:

                    0.005284     0.21    0.007704     0.31    0.010870     0.43

Youth 13-19 yrs:

                    0.003695     0.15    0.005772     0.23    0.010982     0.44

Adults 20-49 yrs:

                    0.003341     0.13    0.004837     0.19    0.008144     0.33

Adults 50+ yrs:

                    0.002942     0.12    0.004081     0.16    0.006160     0.25

Females 13-49 yrs:

                    0.003256     0.132    0.004506     0.18    0.007684     0.31

1 The aPAD for the general population including infants and children = 2.5 mg/kg bw/day.  The aPAD for females 13-49 years old = 0.14 mg/kg bw/day.

™ using an aPAD of 2.5 mg/kg bw/day.  The % aPAD reported in Table 3 was adjusted to account for the lower aPAD (0.14 mg/kg bw/day) for females 13-49 years old using the following formula:  % aPAD = (Exposure/aPAD)*100% = (0.003256/0.14)*100% = 2.3%.

Attachment 3:  DEEM-FCID( Chronic Residue File.

Filename: C:\Documents and Settings\jlangsda\My Documents\Chemicals\Sulfentrazone\November 2010\Sent to Reviewers\129081-chronic-2009-jml__01 DEC 2010.R98

Chemical: Sulfentrazone

RfD(Chronic): .1 mg/kg bw/day  NOEL(Chronic): 0 mg/kg bw/day

RfD(Acute): 2.5 mg/kg bw/day  NOEL(Acute):  0 mg/kg bw/day

Date created/last modified: 12-01-2010/09:51:00/8          Program ver. 2.03

------------------------------------------------------------------------ --------

  EPA    Crop                                   Def Res     Adj.Factors   Comment

  Code    Grp  Commodity Name                    (ppm)       #1    #2

-------- ---- -------------------------------  ----------  ------ ------  -------

01011900 1AB  Horseradish                        0.200000   1.000  1.000  1E0631

          Full comment: 1E06311; TLT 0.10 ppm, exp. 12/31/05

01030150 1CD  Arrowroot, flour                   0.150000   1.000  1.000

01030151 1CD  Arrowroot, flour-babyfood          0.150000   1.000  1.000

01030170 1CD  Artichoke, Jerusalem               0.150000   1.000  1.000

01030820 1CD  Cassava                            0.150000   1.000  1.000

01030821 1CD  Cassava-babyfood                   0.150000   1.000  1.000

01031390 1CD  Dasheen, corm                      0.150000   1.000  1.000

01031660 1CD  Ginger                             0.150000   1.000  1.000

01031661 1CD  Ginger-babyfood                    0.150000   1.000  1.000

01031670 1CD  Ginger, dried                      0.150000   1.000  1.000

01032960 1C   Potato, chips                      0.150000   1.000  1.000

01032970 1C   Potato, dry (granules/ flakes)     0.150000   6.500  1.000

01032971 1C   Potato, dry (granules/ flakes)-b   0.150000   6.500  1.000

01032980 1C   Potato, flour                      0.150000   6.500  1.000

01032981 1C   Potato, flour-babyfood             0.150000   6.500  1.000

01032990 1C   Potato, tuber, w/peel              0.150000   1.000  1.000

01032991 1C   Potato, tuber, w/peel-babyfood     0.150000   1.000  1.000

01033000 1C   Potato, tuber, w/o peel            0.150000   1.000  1.000

01033001 1C   Potato, tuber, w/o peel-babyfood   0.150000   1.000  1.000

01033660 1CD  Sweet potato                       0.150000   1.000  1.000

01033661 1CD  Sweet potato-babyfood              0.150000   1.000  1.000

01033710 1CD  Tanier, corm                       0.150000   1.000  1.000

01033870 1CD  Turmeric                           0.150000   1.000  1.000

01034060 1CD  Yam, true                          0.150000   1.000  1.000

01034070 1CD  Yam bean                           0.150000   1.000  1.000

05010610 5A   Broccoli                           0.200000   1.000  1.000

05010611 5A   Broccoli-babyfood                  0.200000   1.000  1.000

05010620 5A   Broccoli, Chinese                  0.200000   1.000  1.000

05010640 5A   Brussels sprouts                   0.200000   1.000  1.000

05010690 5A   Cabbage                            0.200000   1.000  1.000  1E0631

          Full comment: 1E06311

05010710 5A   Cabbage, Chinese, napa             0.200000   1.000  1.000  1E0631

          Full comment: 1E06311

05010720 5A   Cabbage, Chinese, mustard          0.200000   1.000  1.000  1E0631

          Full comment: 1E06311

05010830 5A   Cauliflower                        0.200000   1.000  1.000

05011960 5A   Kohlrabi                           0.200000   1.000  1.000

05020630 5B   Broccoli raab                      0.400000   1.000  1.000

05020700 5B   Cabbage, Chinese, bok choy         0.400000   1.000  1.000  1E0631

          Full comment: 1E06311

05021170 5B   Collards                           0.400000   1.000  1.000

05021940 5B   Kale                               0.400000   1.000  1.000

05022290 5B   Mustard greens                     0.400000   1.000  1.000

05023180 5B   Rape greens                        0.400000   1.000  1.000

05023890 5B   Turnip, greens                     0.400000   1.000  1.000

06003470 6    Soybean, seed                      0.050000   1.000  1.000

06003480 6    Soybean, flour                     0.050000   1.000  1.000

06003481 6    Soybean, flour-babyfood            0.050000   1.000  1.000

06003490 6    Soybean, soy milk                  0.050000   1.000  1.000

06003491 6    Soybean, soy milk-babyfood or in   0.050000   1.000  1.000

06003500 6    Soybean, oil                       0.050000   1.000  1.000

06003501 6    Soybean, oil-babyfood              0.050000   1.000  1.000

06010430 6A   Bean, snap, succulent              0.150000   1.000  1.000

06010431 6A   Bean, snap, succulent-babyfood     0.150000   1.000  1.000

06012570 6A   Pea, edible podded, succulent      0.150000   1.000  1.000

06020310 6B   Bean, broad, succulent             0.150000   1.000  1.000

06020330 6B   Bean, cowpea, succulent            0.100000   1.000  1.000  TLT, e

          Full comment: TLT, exp. 12/31/04

06020370 6B   Bean, lima, succulent              0.150000   1.000  1.000  2E0649

          Full comment: 2E06498

06022550 6B   Pea, succulent                     0.150000   1.000  1.000

06022551 6B   Pea, succulent-babyfood            0.150000   1.000  1.000

06022590 6B   Pea, pigeon, succulent             0.150000   1.000  1.000

06030300 6C   Bean, black, seed                  0.150000   1.000  1.000  2F0639

          Full comment: 2F06391

06030320 6C   Bean, broad, seed                  0.150000   1.000  1.000  2F0639

          Full comment: 2F06391

06030340 6C   Bean, cowpea, seed                 0.150000   1.000  1.000  2F0639

          Full comment: 2F06391

06030350 6C   Bean,  great northern, seed        0.150000   1.000  1.000  2F0639

          Full comment: 2F06391

06030360 6C   Bean, kidney, seed                 0.150000   1.000  1.000  2F0639

          Full comment: 2F06391

06030380 6C   Bean, lima, seed                   0.150000   1.000  1.000  2F0639

          Full comment: 2F06391

06030390 6C   Bean, mung, seed                   0.150000   1.000  1.000  2F0639

          Full comment: 2F06391

06030400 6C   Bean, navy, seed                   0.150000   1.000  1.000  2F0639

          Full comment: 2F06391

06030410 6C   Bean, pink, seed                   0.150000   1.000  1.000  2F0639

          Full comment: 2F06391

06030420 6C   Bean, pinto, seed                  0.150000   1.000  1.000  2F0639

          Full comment: 2F06391

06030980 6C   Chickpea, seed                     0.150000   1.000  1.000  2F0639

          Full comment: 2F06391

06030981 6C   Chickpea, seed-babyfood            0.150000   1.000  1.000  2F0639

          Full comment: 2F06391

06030990 6C   Chickpea, flour                    0.150000   1.000  1.000  2F0639

          Full comment: 2F06391

06031820 6C   Guar, seed                         0.150000   1.000  1.000  2F0639

          Full comment: 2F06391

06031821 6C   Guar, seed-babyfood                0.150000   1.000  1.000  2F0639

          Full comment: 2F06391

06032030 6C   Lentil, seed                       0.150000   1.000  1.000  2F0639

          Full comment: 2F06391

06032560 6C   Pea, dry                           0.150000   1.000  1.000  2F0639

          Full comment: 2F06391

06032561 6C   Pea, dry-babyfood                  0.150000   1.000  1.000  2F0639

          Full comment: 2F06391

06032580 6C   Pea, pigeon, seed                  0.150000   1.000  1.000  2F0639

          Full comment: 2F06391

08001480 8    Eggplant                           0.150000   1.000  1.000

08002340 8    Okra                               0.150000   1.000  1.000

08002700 8    Pepper, bell                       0.150000   1.000  1.000

08002701 8    Pepper, bell-babyfood              0.150000   1.000  1.000

08002710 8    Pepper, bell, dried                0.150000   1.000  1.000

08002711 8    Pepper, bell, dried-babyfood       0.150000   1.000  1.000

08002720 8    Pepper, nonbell                    0.150000   1.000  1.000  New, S

          Full comment: New, Section 18

08002721 8    Pepper, nonbell-babyfood           0.150000   1.000  1.000  New, S

          Full comment: New, Section 18

08002730 8    Pepper, nonbell, dried             0.150000   1.000  1.000  New, S

          Full comment: New, Section 18

08003740 8    Tomatillo                          0.150000   1.000  1.000

08003750 8    Tomato                             0.150000   1.000  1.000

08003751 8    Tomato-babyfood                    0.150000   1.000  1.000

08003760 8    Tomato, paste                      0.150000   5.400  1.000

08003761 8    Tomato, paste-babyfood             0.150000   5.400  1.000

08003770 8    Tomato, puree                      0.150000   3.300  1.000

08003771 8    Tomato, puree-babyfood             0.150000   3.300  1.000

08003780 8    Tomato, dried                      0.150000  14.300  1.000

08003781 8    Tomato, dried-babyfood             0.150000  14.300  1.000

08003790 8    Tomato, juice                      0.150000   1.500  1.000

09010750 9A   Cantaloupe                         0.150000   1.000  1.000

09010800 9A   Casaba                             0.150000   1.000  1.000

09011870 9A   Honeydew melon                     0.150000   1.000  1.000

09013990 9A   Watermelon                         0.150000   1.000  1.000

09014000 9A   Watermelon, juice                  0.150000   1.000  1.000

15000250 15   Barley, pearled barley             0.100000   1.000  1.000  Inadve

          Full comment: Inadvertent tol.

15000251 15   Barley, pearled barley-babyfood    0.100000   1.000  1.000  Inadve

          Full comment: Inadvertent tol.

15000260 15   Barley, flour                      0.100000   1.000  1.000  Inadve

          Full comment: Inadvertent tol.

15000261 15   Barley, flour-babyfood             0.100000   1.000  1.000  Inadve

          Full comment: Inadvertent tol.

15000270 15   Barley, bran                       0.150000   1.000  1.000  Inadve

          Full comment: Inadvertent tol.

15000650 15   Buckwheat                          0.100000   1.000  1.000  Inadve

          Full comment: Inadvertent tol.

15000660 15   Buckwheat, flour                   0.100000   1.000  1.000  Inadve

          Full comment: Inadvertent tol.

15001200 15   Corn, field, flour                 0.150000   1.000  1.000  2F0639

          Full comment: 2F06391

15001201 15   Corn, field, flour-babyfood        0.150000   1.000  1.000  2F0639

          Full comment: 2F06391

15001210 15   Corn, field, meal                  0.150000   1.000  1.000  2F0639

          Full comment: 2F06391

15001211 15   Corn, field, meal-babyfood         0.150000   1.000  1.000  2F0639

          Full comment: 2F06391

15001220 15   Corn, field, bran                  0.150000   1.000  1.000  Inadve

          Full comment: Inadvertent tol.

15001230 15   Corn, field, starch                0.150000   1.000  1.000  2F0639

          Full comment: 2F06391

15001231 15   Corn, field, starch-babyfood       0.150000   1.000  1.000  2F0639

          Full comment: 2F06391

15001240 15   Corn, field, syrup                 0.150000   1.500  1.000  2F0639

          Full comment: 2F06391

15001241 15   Corn, field, syrup-babyfood        0.150000   1.500  1.000  2F0639

          Full comment: 2F06391

15001250 15   Corn, field, oil                   0.150000   1.000  1.000  2F0639

          Full comment: 2F06391

15001251 15   Corn, field, oil-babyfood          0.150000   1.000  1.000  2F0639

          Full comment: 2F06391

15001260 15   Corn, pop                          0.100000   1.000  1.000  2F0639

          Full comment: 2F06391

15002260 15   Millet, grain                      0.100000   1.000  1.000  Inadve

          Full comment: Inadvertent tol.

15002310 15   Oat, bran                          0.150000   1.000  1.000  Inadve

          Full comment: Inadvertent tol.

15002320 15   Oat, flour                         0.100000   1.000  1.000  Inadve

          Full comment: Inadvertent tol.

15002321 15   Oat, flour-babyfood                0.100000   1.000  1.000  Inadve

          Full comment: Inadvertent tol.

15002330 15   Oat, groats/rolled oats            0.100000   1.000  1.000  Inadve

          Full comment: Inadvertent tol.

15002331 15   Oat, groats/rolled oats-babyfood   0.100000   1.000  1.000  Inadve

          Full comment: Inadvertent tol.

15003230 15   Rice, white                        0.100000   1.000  1.000  Inadve

          Full comment: Inadvertent tol.

15003231 15   Rice, white-babyfood               0.100000   1.000  1.000  Inadve

          Full comment: Inadvertent tol.

15003240 15   Rice, brown                        0.100000   1.000  1.000  Inadve

          Full comment: Inadvertent tol.

15003241 15   Rice, brown-babyfood               0.100000   1.000  1.000  Inadve

          Full comment: Inadvertent tol.

15003250 15   Rice, flour                        0.100000   1.000  1.000  Inadve

          Full comment: Inadvertent tol.

15003251 15   Rice, flour-babyfood               0.100000   1.000  1.000  Inadve

          Full comment: Inadvertent tol.

15003260 15   Rice, bran                         0.150000   1.000  1.000  Inadve

          Full comment: Inadvertent tol.

15003261 15   Rice, bran-babyfood                0.150000   1.000  1.000  Inadve

          Full comment: Inadvertent tol.

15003280 15   Rye, grain                         0.100000   1.000  1.000  Inadve

          Full comment: Inadvertent tol.

15003290 15   Rye, flour                         0.100000   1.000  1.000  Inadve

          Full comment: Inadvertent tol.

15003440 15   Sorghum, grain                     0.100000   1.000  1.000  Inadve

          Full comment: Inadvertent tol.

15003450 15   Sorghum, syrup                     0.100000   1.000  1.000  Inadve

          Full comment: Inadvertent tol.

15003810 15   Triticale, flour                   0.100000   1.000  1.000  Inadve

          Full comment: Inadvertent tol.

15003811 15   Triticale, flour-babyfood          0.100000   1.000  1.000  Inadve

          Full comment: Inadvertent tol.

15004010 15   Wheat, grain                       0.100000   1.000  1.000  Inadve

          Full comment: Inadvertent tol.

15004011 15   Wheat, grain-babyfood              0.100000   1.000  1.000  Inadve

          Full comment: Inadvertent tol.

15004020 15   Wheat, flour                       0.100000   1.000  1.000  Inadve

          Full comment: Inadvertent tol.

15004021 15   Wheat, flour-babyfood              0.100000   1.000  1.000  Inadve

          Full comment: Inadvertent tol.

15004030 15   Wheat, germ                        0.100000   1.000  1.000  Inadve

          Full comment: Inadvertent tol.

15004040 15   Wheat, bran                        0.150000   1.000  1.000  Inadve

          Full comment: Inadvertent tol.

15004050 15   Wild rice                          0.100000   1.000  1.000  Inadve

          Full comment: Inadvertent tol.

20001630 20   Flaxseed, oil                      0.150000   1.000  1.000

20003640 20   Sunflower, seed                    0.200000   1.000  1.000

20003650 20   Sunflower, oil                     0.200000   1.000  1.000

20003651 20   Sunflower, oil-babyfood            0.200000   1.000  1.000

86010000 O    Water, direct, all sources         0.026000   1.000  1.000

86020000 O    Water, indirect, all sources       0.026000   1.000  1.000

95000190 O    Asparagus                          0.150000   1.000  1.000  2E0650

          Full comment: 2E06500

95002630 O    Peanut                             0.200000   1.000  1.000  0F0611

          Full comment: 0F06116

95002640 O    Peanut, butter                     0.200000   1.890  1.000  0F0611

          Full comment: 0F06116

95002650 O    Peanut, oil                        0.200000   1.000  1.000  0F0611

          Full comment: 0F06116

95002750 O    Peppermint                         0.300000   1.000  1.000  1E0631

          Full comment: 1E06311

95002760 O    Peppermint, oil                    0.300000   1.000  1.000  1E0631

          Full comment: 1E06311

95003520 O    Spearmint                          0.300000   1.000  1.000  1E0631

          Full comment: 1E06311

95003530 O    Spearmint, oil                     0.300000   1.000  1.000  1E0631

          Full comment: 1E06311

95003590 O    Strawberry                         0.150000   1.000  1.000

95003591 O    Strawberry-babyfood                0.150000   1.000  1.000

95003600 O    Strawberry, juice                  0.150000   1.000  1.000

95003601 O    Strawberry, juice-babyfood         0.150000   1.000  1.000

95003620 O    Sugarcane, sugar                   0.150000   1.000  1.000

95003621 O    Sugarcane, sugar-babyfood          0.150000   1.000  1.000

95003630 O    Sugarcane, molasses                0.200000   1.000  1.000

95003631 O    Sugarcane, molasses-babyfood       0.200000   1.000  1.000

95003800 O    Tomato, Tree                       0.150000   1.000  1.000

Attachment 4:  DEEM-FCID( Chronic Exposure Estimates.

U.S. Environmental Protection Agency                                 Ver. 2.00

DEEM-FCID Chronic analysis for SULFENTRAZONE                    (1994-98 data)

Residue file name: C:\Documents and Settings\jlangsda\My Documents\Chemicals\Sulfentrazone\November 2010\Sent to Reviewers\129081-chronic-2009-jml__01 DEC 2010.R98

                                                     Adjustment factor #2 used.

Analysis Date 12-01-2010/10:00:17     Residue file dated: 12-01-2010/09:51:00/8

Reference dose (RfD, Chronic) = .1 mg/kg bw/day

======================================================================== =======

                    Total exposure by population subgroup

------------------------------------------------------------------------ -------

                                                    Total Exposure

                                         -----------------------------------

          Population                         mg/kg             Percent of

           Subgroup                       body wt/day             Rfd

--------------------------------------   -------------       ---------------

U.S. Population (total)                     0.001751                 1.8%

U.S. Population (spring season)             0.001760                 1.8%

U.S. Population (summer season)             0.001841                 1.8%

U.S. Population (autumn season)             0.001701                 1.7%

U.S. Population (winter season)             0.001700                 1.7%

Northeast region                            0.001667                 1.7%

Midwest region                              0.001810                 1.8%

Southern region                             0.001696                 1.7%

Western region                              0.001849                 1.8%

Hispanics                                   0.001922                 1.9%

Non-hispanic whites                         0.001704                 1.7%

Non-hispanic blacks                         0.001782                 1.8%

Non-hisp/non-white/non-black                0.002025                 2.0%

All infants (< 1 year)                      0.003117                 3.1%

Nursing infants                             0.001240                 1.2%

Non-nursing infants                         0.003829                 3.8%

Children 1-6  yrs                           0.003430                 3.4%

Children 7-12 yrs                           0.002286                 2.3%

Females 13-19 (not preg or nursing)         0.001519                 1.5%

Females 20+ (not preg or nursing)           0.001400                 1.4%

Females 13-50 yrs                           0.001534                 1.5%

Females 13+ (preg/not nursing)              0.001513                 1.5%

Females 13+ (nursing)                       0.001853                 1.9%

Males 13-19 yrs                             0.001796                 1.8%

Males 20+ yrs                               0.001485                 1.5%

Seniors 55+                                 0.001352                 1.4%

Children 1-2 yrs                            0.003565                 3.6%

Children 3-5 yrs                            0.003463                 3.5%

Children 6-12 yrs                           0.002404                 2.4%

Youth 13-19 yrs                             0.001660                 1.7%

Adults 20-49 yrs                            0.001492                 1.5%

Adults 50+ yrs                              0.001360                 1.4%

Females 13-49 yrs                           0.001451                 1.5%

------------------------------------------------------------------------ -------

Sulfentrazone	Dietary Exposure and Risk Assessment	           DP Number:  D384090

PC Code:  129081

________________________________________________________________________ ____________________

Page   PAGE  1  of   NUMPAGES  18


[Federal Register: September 8, 2006 (Volume 71, Number 174)]
[Notices]
[Page 53140-53141]
[DOCID:fr08se06-81]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

[Release No. IC-27475; 812-12420]

Delaware Investments Dividend and Income Fund, Inc., et al.,
Notice of Intention To Rescind an Order

September 1, 2006.
AGENCY: Securities and Exchange Commission (``Commission'').

ACTION: Notice of the Commission's intention to rescind an order
pursuant to section 38(a) of the Investment Company Act of 1940
(``Act'').

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: On April 15, 2002, the Commission issued an order on an
application filed by Delaware Investments Dividend and Income Fund,
Inc. and Delaware Investments Global Dividend and Income Fund
(together, the ``Applicants'') under section 6(c) of the Act granting
an exemption from section 19(b) of the Act and rule 19b-1 under the Act
(the ``Application'').\1\ On August 31, 2006, the Commission issued an
order finding, among other things, that Delaware Service Company, Inc.
(``DSC'') caused and aided and abetted the Applicants' violations of
section 19(a) of the Act and rule 19a-1 under the Act and violated

section 34(b) of the Act by making a material misrepresentation to the
Commission in the Application (``Order Finding Violations'').\2\ The
Commission is issuing this notice of the Commission's intention to
rescind the Exemptive Order on the basis of the Order Finding
Violations.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \1\ Delaware Investments Dividend and Income Fund, Inc., et al.,
Investment Company Act Release Nos. 25465 (Mar. 18, 2002) (notice)
and 25524 (Apr. 15, 2002) (``Exemptive Order'').
    \2\ In the Matter of Delaware Service Company Inc., Release No.
IC-27473, Administrative Proceeding File No. 3-12403 (August 31,
2006).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    Hearing or Notification of Hearing: An order rescinding the
Exemptive Order will be issued unless the Commission orders a hearing.
Interested persons may request a hearing by writing to the Commission's
Secretary. Hearing requests should be received by the Commission by
5:30 p.m. on September 25, 2006. Hearing requests should state the
nature of the writer's interest, the reason for the request, and the
issues contested. Persons who wish to be notified of a hearing may
request notification by writing to the Commission's Secretary.

ADDRESSES: Secretary, Commission, 100 F Street, NE., Washington, DC
20549-1090.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Nadya B. Roytblat, Assistant Director,
at<PHONE_NUMBER> (Division of Investment Management, Office of
Investment Company Regulation).

Background

    1. Each Applicant is a closed-end investment company registered
under the Act. The Exemptive Order granted each Applicant relief from
section 19(b) of the Act and rule 19b-1 under the Act so that the
Applicant may make up to twelve distributions of long-term capital
gains in any one taxable year in accordance with the Applicants'
distribution policy with respect to its common stock. Section 19(b) and
rule 19b-1 generally limit to one the number of distributions of long-
term capital gains that a registered investment company may make each
year. The Exemptive Order was issued pursuant to the Commission's
authority set forth in section 6(c) of the Act which provides, in
relevant part, that the Commission, by order upon application, may
exempt any person from any provision of the Act or any rule under the
Act, if and to the extent that the exemption is necessary or
appropriate in the public interest and consistent with the protection
of investors and the purposes fairly intended by the policy and
provisions of the Act.
    2. DSC, a Delaware corporation, provides accounting and
administrative services to the Applicants. According to the Order
Finding Violations, DSC was responsible for determining the amount and
composition of the Applicants' distributions to shareholders; providing
the Applicants' transfer agent, dividend disbursing agent, and
custodian with information necessary to effect payment of dividends and
distributions; and preparing and filing all reports and notices
required by the Federal securities laws and regulations, including any
notices required by section 19(a) of the Act.
    3. Section 19(a) of the Act and rule 19a-1 under the Act make it
unlawful for a registered investment company to pay any dividend or
make any distribution in the nature of a dividend payment, wholly or
partly, from any source other than net income unless such payment is
accompanied by a written statement which adequately discloses the
source of such payment (``section 19(a) notice''). According to the
Order Finding Violations, from January 2000 through March 2004, the
Applicants, among others, made distributions to their common
shareholders that, in large part, were a return of the shareholders'
capital, and none of the distributions was accompanied by the required
section 19(a) notice. Thus, during the relevant time period, the
Applicants failed to provide the section 19(a) notices required by the
Act. The Order Finding Violations found that DSC caused and aided and
abetted the Applicants' violations of section 19(a) and rule 19a-1.
    4. The Order Finding Violations also found that the Exemptive Order
was granted, in part, on the basis of a representation in the
Application that the Applicants were providing the required 19(a)
notices to their shareholders, but that the representation was an
untrue statement of a material fact. The Application was prepared by
DSC on behalf of the Applicants. The Order Finding Violations thus
found that DSC violated section 34(b) of the Act. Section 34(b) of the
Act, in relevant part, makes it unlawful for any person to make any
untrue statement of a material fact in any application filed pursuant
to the Act.

Legal Analysis

    Section 38(a) of the Act states, in relevant part, that the
Commission shall have authority to rescind an order as is necessary or
appropriate to the exercise of the powers conferred upon the Commission
elsewhere in the Act. The Commission issues orders under section 6(c)
of the Act, such as the Exemptive Order, based on the representations,
and subject to the terms and conditions, contained in the applications
seeking the orders. If an application contains an untrue statement of a
material fact, the Commission cannot properly exercise its power to
make the findings required by section 6(c) of the Act.\3\ The
Commission therefore believes that it is necessary and appropriate to
the exercise of the powers conferred upon the Commission in section
6(c) of the Act to rescind the Exemptive Order on the basis of the
Order Finding Violations.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \3\ The Commission also reiterates that any exemption provided
by an order issued under the Act is available only to a person that
complies with the terms and conditions set forth in the application
based on which the exemption was granted.

    By the Commission.
Nancy M. Morris,
Secretary.
 [FR Doc. E6-14879 Filed 9-7-06; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 8010-01-P


 C:\ dmautop\ temp\ DCTM_ ARP. wpd MEMORANDUM TO: EPA Docket OW 2003 0074, Effluent Guidelines Program Plan for 2004/ 2005 FROM: Betsy Bicknell, ERG DATE: January 29, 2004 SUBJECT: January 28, 2004, Public Meeting on the Preliminary Effluent Guidelines Program Plan for 2004/ 2005 Notes This memorandum provides highlights of the presentations given during the January 28, 2004, public meeting on the Preliminary Effluent Guidelines Program Plan for 2004/ 2005. Attendees asked questions during EPA presentations. These questions and EPA's responses to them are included at the point they occurred in the presentations.

I. Welcome and Overview of the 304( m) Planning Process Slide Presentation by Mary Smith ( Director, Engineering & Analysis Division)

° How EPA is implementing the draft strategy published November 2002. ° What are ELGs? ° Address direct and indirect discharges; ° Industry specific; ° Technology based; ° Numerical; ° Economically achievable. ° Major issues addressed in a Rulemaking  Economics, loadings, and removals. ° Often involves new data collection. ° 304( m) added to CWA in 1987 requires: ° ( 1) Annual review; ° ( 2) Plan published in even years; and ° EPA must regulate a new category if there is a " nontrivial" discharge of pollutants. ° The 1992 consent decree took over the planning process. Last rules to be finalized under consent decree: ° 2/ 26/ 04 ( meats); ° 3/ 31/ 04 ( C& D); and ° 6/ 30/ 04 ( aquaculture). Memorandum January 29, 2004 Page 2 C:\ dmautop\ temp\ DCTM_ ARP. wpd ° Draft Strategy  11/ 2002 based on ELG goals of Task Force: ° Reduce risk to human health and environment; ° Involve stakeholders; and ° Transparent decision making. ° Draft Strategy considers four factors: ° 1. Risk to Human Health and the Environment; ° 2. Technology Developments; ° 3. Economic Considerations; and ° 4. Implementation/ Efficiency. ° Draft Strategy implemented in four phases: ° 1. Scree; ° 2. Prioritize; ° 3. In depth review; and ° 4. Decide. ° Strategy implementation is not a rulemaking process: ° Data do not need to be " rulemaking" quality. ° Request for comments, and extension, encourage comments.

II. Review of the Preliminary Plan Slide Presentation by Tom Wall ( Chief, Chemical Engineering Branch)

° Example of multimedia considerations in planning guidelines: ° Timber Products ( plywood) MACT, which may result in change of ELG applicability in order to encourage best air toxics control. ° Analytical Framework and Methodology: ° Two key sets of information used in screening review: PCS and TRI; ° Used Toxic Weighting Factors used for years in guidelines program to develop category rankings; and ° Stakeholder concerns. ° The plan published Dec 31, 2003 differs from the Draft Strategy in that EPA has not yet completed detailed review of high priority categories. ° Annual Review is the screening review, using PCS and TRI data. ° After initial ranking, lower the priority of certain categories: ° New regulations; ° Predominantly indirect dischargers; ° Regulated by other Clean Water Act ( CWA) sections ( e. g., vessels) ° Is there an NPDES permit? If yes then ELG; if no, then other CWA section applies. Memorandum January 29, 2004 Page 3 C:\ dmautop\ temp\ DCTM_ ARP. wpd ° One or only a few facilities drive the toxic weighted pounds discharged; and ° If data were unclear or hazard uncertain. ° Outcome of the first screening review: ° OCPSF ( including potential new subcategory  CFPR); and ° Petroleum Refining ( including potential new subcategory  PBST). ° Refer to Rationale Memo in the docket for more details. ° New Category: looked at Section 306 " Categories of Sources" for non trivial discharges. No new categories: two potential new subcategories ( CFPR & PBST).

III. Data Gathering Activities and Analyses for the Final Plan Slide Presentation by Carey Johnston ( 304( m) Planning Team)

° Schedule: EPA currently working on detailed studies. Will complete by end of March. ° Final plan development is iterative; studies are revised and refined as team gets questions from EPA management and questions and data from public comments. ° Decisions for final plan will be made by end of May. ° Screening Level data sources: ° TRI and PCS used to identify what is discharged; and ° WATERS Expert Query Tool used to link discharges to impaired water bodies. ° Question: Have you also looked at NPDES permits? ° Answer: Absolutely. ° Mr. Johnston repeated a comment that EAD had heard already: Why did EAD use TRI since it is not a perfect database ( for this application)? ° Response: EPA did not use TRI alone, but reviewed other existing data and used " weight of evidence" approach. ° Environmental data not used in the screening review were those not linked to specific facilities, e. g. fish tissue, sediment contaminants databases, etc. ° Data Challenges: ° Iterative approach to eliminate data errors in PCS and TRI; ° PCS does not have monitoring data for minor facilities and general permits; ° SIC code classification may not correspond to source of wastewater; and ° Lack of latitude & longitude for many discharge points. ° Impairments: ° EPA investigated the question, " Was the facility discharging a pollutant for which the receiving water was impaired?" ° The impairments analyses was not a driving factor in category ranking; and Memorandum January 29, 2004 Page 4 C:\ dmautop\ temp\ DCTM_ ARP. wpd ° EAD did not look at the magnitude of discharges. ° Limitations of screening approach: ° Can only identify parameters that are monitored; and ° Ranking based only on toxicity, other impacts ( e. g., nutrients) not included. ° Summary  Imperfect databases, iterative approach, blend quantitative and qualitative information sources. ° Question: How many facilities did we talk to? ° Answer: Not more than nine per category. ° Question: Will the decision to identify the category for potential new rulemaking be based this limited data? ° Answer: Yes. ° EAD Director Mary Smith emphasized that development of the Effluent Guidelines Program Plan is not a rulemaking and EAD is depending industries to supplement data readily available to EPA. ° Question: How is impaired water work related to TMDL? ° Answer: TMDLs are far off, some may be approved, but no schedules/ time tables on how to get there. ° Question: Why not let TMDLs do the work  Why go to ELGs? ° Answer: Tools for improving water quality include ELGs as well as TMDLs. ELGs are the proper tool for certain toxic pollutants. ° Comment on Detailed Study Approach  SIC Code for PBST are overly broad includes small facilities with a few small tanks on stilts. ° Response: EAD is looking at PBST as a potential new subcategory of petroleum refining for efficiency. After review of existing data, EAD concluded that only a very few facilities drive the analysis. Effluent guidelines are crafted ( through applicability definitions that include size cut offs, for example) to avoid impacts to small businesses. ° Example of EAD deciding not to develop ELGs for categories or subcategories with few facilities: Pulp and Paper Phase III. EAD decided to support permit writers. ° Side note on dioxin. ° To avoid overestimating pollutant releases, if a pollutant was reported " detected" in PCS, EAD assumed the mass discharged was zero ( 0). ° This approach is consistent with TRI guidance for reporting dioxins. ° Emphasized EAD has not identified any category for further regulation in the 12/ 31/ 03 notice. Identified two categories for further detailed review. ° Question about PCS issues: How do you justify using a database that does not have data of the quality you would like? Memorandum January 29, 2004 Page 5 C:\ dmautop\ temp\ DCTM_ ARP. wpd ° Answer: Quality plan is in the docket. Let us know if there are errors in PCS or TRI data. We have found errors in PCS, incorrect flow, misreported SIC codes, etc. ( Note: EAD also found errors in TRI.) ° CFPR  Identified this group as a possible new subcategory, but EAD is still investigating how they are currently regulated. ° Question: What threshold is used to determine if a discharge is " non trivial?" ° Answer ( provided by EAD Director Mary Smith): EAD has not identified any " new categories," so did not have to answer this question.

IV Considering Voluntary Loading Reductions Slide Presentation by Patricia Harrigan ( 304( m) Planning Team)

° Factor Four: Implementation and Efficiency Considerations. ° Where is the industry engaged in voluntary loading reduction? ° Are these strategies widely adopted? Do they address toxic and nonconventional pollutants? ° Benefits to industry of voluntary reductions: ° Lower priority for ELGs; and ° Industry sets its own goals. ° How can loading reductions be verified? ° Are any voluntary loading reductions " meaningful" in terms of reducing wastewater risks to human health and the environment?

A. Performance Track Program Slide Presentation by Daniel Fiorino ( Program Director, Office of Policy Economics and Innovation)

° Performance Track is a " Beyond Compliance," three year old program, with 345 members ( facilities). ° Requirements to enroll: ° ( 1) Environmental Management System ( EMS); ° ( 2) Commitment to continuous improvement; ° ( 3) Good compliance history; and ° ( 4) Community outreach. ° EPA does annual audit. ° Facilities submit annual performance report. Memorandum January 29, 2004 Page 6 C:\ dmautop\ temp\ DCTM_ ARP. wpd ° If poor performance in audit or no performance report submitted, facility is asked to leave program. ° Benefits  Recognition, low inspection priority. ° EPA works with states ( CO, MA, TN, TX, and VA). ° Commitments to continuous improvement, examples: ° Reduce water use ( 47% of members); and ° Reduce water pollutants loads ( 17% of members).

B. Resource Conservation Challenge Slide Presentation by David Hockey ( Program Director, RCC  Multimedia)

RCRA historically focused on hazard waste, now look at other solid wastes, approaches to reduce waste " cradle to cradle" " C to C") system.

Voluntary partnerships.

Measurable outcomes.

Multimedia: Six ideas.... include reducing priority chemicals and beneficial re use.

Nine clusters, many kinds of partnership.

Thirty persistent, bioaccumulative, and toxic chemicals ( PBTs) in waste. Voluntary approach to reductions  Using TRI to identify states, industry sectors, compliance assistance, cross fertilization of reduction ideas. Facilities sign up to report progress and receive recognition.

C. Design for the Environment Slide Presentation by Clive Davies ( Program Director, DFE, OPPTS)

DFE asks " What is the environment impact of use of a particular chemical?"

Life Cycle Assessment Approach.

DFE can do this quickly and inexpensively. Challenge " presumption of safety." Examples:

Brominated flame retardants;

Paint  " best practices" for spray application; and

Replace use of lead in printed circuit boards.

DFE recognition sticker.


[Federal Register Volume 84, Number 129 (Friday, July 5, 2019)]
[Notices]
[Pages 32232-32233]
[FR Doc No: 2019-14278]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

[Release No. 34-86238; File No. SR-NYSE-2019-14]

Self-Regulatory Organizations; New York Stock Exchange LLC;
Notice of Designation of Longer Period for Commission Action on
Proposed Rule Change To Amend Section 703.18 of the Listed Company
Manual To Permit the Listing of Event-Based Contingent Value Rights and
Make Other Changes To the Listing Standards for Contingent Value Rights

June 28, 2019.
    On April 25, 2019, New York Stock Exchange LLC (the ``Exchange'')
filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (``Commission''),
pursuant to Section 19(b)(1) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934
(``Act'') \1\ and Rule 19b-4 thereunder,\2\ a proposed rule change to
amend Section 703.18 of the Exchange's Listed Company Manual to expand
the circumstances under which a contingent value right (``CVR'') may be
listed on the Exchange and make other changes to the listing standards
for CVRs. The proposed rule change was published for comment in the
Federal Register on May 15, 2019.\3\ The Commission received no
comments on the proposed rule change.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \1\ 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(1).
    \2\ 17 CFR 240.19b-4.
    \3\ See Securities Exchange Act Release No. 85812 (May 9, 2019),
84 FR 21861.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    Section 19(b)(2) of the Act \4\ provides that within 45 days of the
publication of notice of the filing of a proposed rule change, or
within such longer period up to 90 days as the Commission may designate
if it finds such longer period to be appropriate and publishes its
reasons for so finding or as to which the self-regulatory organization
consents, the Commission shall either approve the proposed rule change,
disapprove the proposed rule change, or institute proceedings to
determine whether the proposed rule change should be disapproved. The
45th day for this filing is June 29, 2019.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \4\ 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(2).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    The Commission is extending the 45-day time period for Commission
action on the proposed rule change. The Commission finds that it is
appropriate to designate a longer period within which to take action on
the proposed rule change so that it has sufficient time to consider the
proposed rule change.
    Accordingly, pursuant to Section 19(b)(2) of the Act,\5\ the
Commission designates August 13, 2019, as the date

by which the Commission shall either approve or disapprove, or
institute proceedings to determine whether to disapprove, the proposed
rule change (File No. SR-NYSE-2019-14).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \5\ Id.

    For the Commission, by the Division of Trading and Markets,
pursuant to delegated authority.\6\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \6\ 17 CFR 200.30-3(a)(31).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

Eduardo A. Aleman,
Deputy Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2019-14278 Filed 7-3-19; 8:45 am]
 BILLING CODE 8011-01-P?>


[Federal Register Volume 88, Number 10 (Tuesday, January 17, 2023)]
[Notices]
[Pages 2756-2757]
[FR Doc No: 2023-00682]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION

National Highway Traffic Safety Administration

[Docket No. NHTSA-2022-0014; Notice 1]

Porsche Cars North America, Inc., Receipt of Petition for
Decision of Inconsequential Noncompliance

AGENCY: National Highway Traffic Safety Administration (NHTSA),
Department of Transportation (DOT).

ACTION: Receipt of petition.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: Porsche Cars North America, Inc., (Porsche) has determined
that certain model year (MY) 2020-2021 Porsche Panamera motor vehicles
do not fully comply with Federal Motor Vehicle Safety Standard (FMVSS)
No. 126, Electronic Stability Control Systems for Light Vehicles, No.
135, Light Vehicle Brake Systems, FMVSS No. 138, Tire Pressure
Monitoring Systems. Porsche filed a noncompliance report dated December
15, 2021. Porsche subsequently petitioned NHTSA on January 14, 2022,
for a decision that the subject noncompliance is inconsequential as it
relates to motor vehicle safety. This notice announces receipt of
Porsche's petition.

DATES: Send comments on or before February 16, 2023.

ADDRESSES: Interested persons are invited to submit written data,
views, and arguments on this petition. Comments must refer to the
docket and notice number cited in the title of this notice and
submitted by any of the following methods:
     Mail: Send comments by mail addressed to the U.S.
Department of Transportation, Docket Operations, M-30, West Building
Ground Floor, Room W12-140, 1200 New Jersey Avenue SE, Washington, DC
20590.
     Hand Delivery: Deliver comments by hand to the U.S.
Department of Transportation, Docket Operations, M-30, West Building
Ground Floor, Room W12-140, 1200 New Jersey Avenue, SE, Washington, DC
20590. The Docket Section is open on weekdays from 10 a.m. to 5 p.m.
except for Federal holidays.
     Electronically: Submit comments electronically by logging
onto the Federal Docket Management System (FDMS) website at https://www.regulations.gov/. Follow the online instructions for submitting
comments.
     Comments may also be faxed to<PHONE_NUMBER>.
    Comments must be written in the English language, and be no greater
than 15 pages in length, although there is no limit to the length of
necessary attachments to the comments. If comments are submitted in
hard copy form, please ensure that two copies are provided. If you wish
to receive confirmation that comments you have submitted by mail were
received, please enclose a stamped, self-addressed postcard with the
comments. Note that all comments received will be posted without change
to https://www.regulations.gov, including any personal information
provided.
    All comments and supporting materials received before the close of
business on the closing date indicated above will be filed in the
docket and will be considered. All comments and supporting materials
received after the closing date will also be filed and will be
considered to the fullest extent possible.
    When the petition is granted or denied, notice of the decision will
also be published in the Federal Register pursuant to the authority
indicated at the end of this notice.
    All comments, background documentation, and supporting materials
submitted to the docket may be viewed by anyone at the address and
times given above. The documents may also be viewed on the internet at
https://www.regulations.gov by following the online instructions for
accessing the docket. The docket ID number for this petition is shown
in the heading of this notice.
    DOT's complete Privacy Act Statement is available for review in a
Federal Register notice published on April 11, 2000 (65 FR 19477-78).

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Vince Williams, General Engineer,
NHTSA, Office of Vehicle Safety Compliance,<PHONE_NUMBER>.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
    I. Overview: Porsche has determined that certain MY 2020-2021
Porsche Panamera motor vehicles do not fully comply with the
requirements of paragraph S5.3.4 of FMVSS No. 126, Electronic Stability
Control Systems for Light Vehicles (49 CFR 571.126), paragraph S5.5.2
of No. 135, Light Vehicle Brake Systems (49 CFR 571.135); paragraph
S4.3.3 of FMVSS No. 138, Tire Pressure Monitoring Systems (49 CFR
571.138). Porsche filed a noncompliance report dated December 15, 2021,
pursuant to 49 CFR part 573, Defect and Noncompliance Responsibility
and Reports. Porsche subsequently petitioned NHTSA on January 14, 2022,
for an exemption from the notification and remedy requirements of 49
U.S.C. chapter 301 on the basis that this noncompliance is
inconsequential as it relates to motor vehicle safety, pursuant to 49
U.S.C. 30118(d) and 30120(h) and 49 CFR part 556, Exemption for
Inconsequential Defect or Noncompliance.
    This notice of receipt of Porsche's petition is published under 49
U.S.C. 30118 and 30120 and does not represent any Agency decision or
other exercise of judgment concerning the merits of the petition.
    II. Vehicles Involved: Approximately 4,720 MY 2020-2021 Porsche
Panamera motor vehicles manufactured between November 3, 2020, and
December 8, 2021, are potentially involved.
    III. Noncompliance: Porsche explains that the noncompliance is that
the digital telltales do not illuminate during the lamp check function
when the ignition is in the ``On'' position.
    IV. Rule Requirements: Paragraph S5.3.4 of FMVSS No. 126, paragraph
S5.5.2 of FMVSS No. 135, and

paragraph S4.3.3 of FMVSS No. 138 include the requirements relevant to
this petition:
     Except when a starter interlock is in operation, each ESC
malfunction telltale must be activated as a check of lamp function
either when the ignition locking system is turned to the ``On''
(``Run'') position when the engine is not running, or when the ignition
locking system is in a position between ``On'' (``Run'') and ``Start''
that is designated by the manufacturer as a check position.
     All indicators shall be activated as a check function by
either: (1) automatic activation when the ignition (start) switch is
turned to the ``On'' (``Run'') position when the engine is not running,
or when the ignition (``Start'') switch is in a position between ``On''
(``Run'') and ``Start'' that is designated by the manufacturer as a
check position, or (2) a single manual action by the driver, such as
momentary activation of a test button or switch mounted on the
instrument panel in front of and in clear view of the driver, or, in
the case of an indicator for application of the parking brake, by
applying the parking brake when the ignition is in the ``On'' (``Run'')
position. In the case of a vehicle that has an interlock device that
prevents the engine from being started under one or more conditions,
check functions meeting the two aforementioned requirements need not be
operational under any condition in which the engine cannot be started.
The manufacturer must explain the brake check function test procedure
in the owner's manual.
     Except when a starter interlock is in operation, each low
tire pressure warning telltale must illuminate as a check of lamp
function either when the ignition locking system is activated to the
``On'' (``Run'') position when the engine is not running, or when the
ignition locking system is in a position between ``On'' (``Run'') and
``Start'' that is designated by the manufacturer as a check position.
    V. Summary of Porsche's Petition: The following views and arguments
presented in this section, ``V. Summary of Porsche's Petition,'' are
the views and arguments provided by Porsche. They have not been
evaluated by the Agency and do not reflect the views of the Agency.
Porsche begins by describing the subject noncompliance and stating its
belief that the noncompliance is inconsequential as it relates to motor
vehicle safety.
    Porsche explains that the telltale displays for several systems
found in the subject vehicles, including the ESC system, brake system,
and the tire pressure monitoring system (TPMS), do not use light bulbs
or lamps but instead ``utilize Thin-film-transistor (TFT) LCD
technology.'' Therefore, according to Porsche, ``the bulb check or lamp
check requirements of the cited FMVSS would not fulfill the safety
purpose for which these requirements were originally written.''
    Porsche claims that despite the subject noncompliance, ``there is
no adverse effect on the function on the warning telltale itself in the
intended (warning) cases for any of the FMVSS-required telltales''
because in the event that the system fails, the corresponding light
would still illuminate.
    Porsche states that when the bulb check requirements were first
developed in 1969, vehicles used light bulbs with filament which ``had
a limited life span and were expected to fail routinely during the life
of the vehicle,'' therefore the bulb check requirements were intended
to notify the driver of these anticipated bulb failures. According to
Porsche, because the subject vehicles instead use LCD displays which
``do not use filaments and have an expected life span that far exceeds
the expected useful life of the vehicle,'' the required bulb check
function is ``superfluous to safety.''
    Furthermore, Porsche says that ``even in the event of an
illumination failure of the subject displays, the nature of the LCD
cluster would make the failure obvious to the driver, eliminating the
need for a bulb check.'' If the display were to malfunction, Porsche
explains that ``the entire LCD display would go dark, leaving a
substantial, and obvious portion of the instrument cluster dark'' which
would immediately alert the driver. Therefore, Porsche claims that
NHTSA's stated purpose of the bulb check requirement \1\ would be
fulfilled.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \1\ See Letter from A. Cooke, Chief Counsel, NHTSA, to R.
Clarke, President, Truck Manufacturers Association (March 5, 2007)
https://isearch.nhtsa.gov/files/001402rls.htm.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    Additionally, Porsche claims that ``NHTSA also has recognized that
these types of multi-function displays would not be expected to have
the same functionality as traditional telltales and therefore may meet
bulb check requirements in different ways.'' Porsche references the
FMVSS No. 126 final rule published by NHTSA on April 6, 2007,\2\ to
support its assertion that NHTSA has previously determined that a bulb
check is not relevant or necessary to the type of display technology
utilized for information/message centers. Therefore, if the display
experiences a problem analogous to one which would be found by a
telltale's bulb check, the entire message center would be non-
operational, a situation likely to be rapidly discovered by the driver.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \2\ See 72 FR 17235.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    Porsche concludes by stating its belief that the subject
noncompliance is inconsequential as it relates to motor vehicle safety,
and that its petition to be exempted from providing notification of the
noncompliance, as required by 49 U.S.C. 30118, and a remedy for the
noncompliance, as required by 49 U.S.C. 30120, should be granted.
    NHTSA notes that the statutory provisions (49 U.S.C. 30118(d) and
30120(h)) that permit manufacturers to file petitions for a
determination of inconsequentiality allow NHTSA to exempt manufacturers
only from the duties found in sections 30118 and 30120, respectively,
to notify owners, purchasers, and dealers of a defect or noncompliance
and to remedy the defect or noncompliance. Therefore, any decision on
this petition only applies to the subject vehicles that Porsche no
longer controlled at the time it determined that the noncompliance
existed. However, any decision on this petition does not relieve
vehicle distributors and dealers of the prohibitions on the sale, offer
for sale, or introduction or delivery for introduction into interstate
commerce of the noncompliant vehicles under their control after Porsche
notified them that the subject noncompliance existed.

(Authority: 49 U.S.C. 30118, 30120: delegations of authority at 49
CFR 1.95 and 501.8.)

Otto G. Matheke III,
Director, Office of Vehicle Safety Compliance.
[FR Doc. 2023-00682 Filed 1-13-23; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE P