[Federal Register Volume 85, Number 224 (Thursday, November 19, 2020)]
[Notices]
[Pages 73813-73815]
[FR Doc No: 2020-25500]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

[Release No. 34-90414; File No. SR-NYSEArca-2020-96]

Self-Regulatory Organizations; NYSE Arca, Inc.; Notice of Filing
and Immediate Effectiveness of Proposed Rule Change Modifying the NYSE
Arca Options Fee Schedule Regarding the Criteria To Qualify for a
Posting Credit on Certain Customer Volume

November 13, 2020.
    Pursuant to Section 19(b)(1) \1\ of the Securities Exchange Act of
1934 (the ``Act'') \2\ and Rule 19b-4 thereunder,\3\ notice is hereby
given that, on November 2, 2020, NYSE Arca, Inc. (``NYSE Arca'' or the
``Exchange'') filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the
``Commission'') the proposed rule change as described in Items I, II,
and III below, which Items have been prepared by the self-regulatory
organization. The Commission is publishing this notice to solicit
comments on the proposed rule change from interested persons.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \1\ 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(1).
    \2\ 15 U.S.C. 78a.
    \3\ 17 CFR 240.19b-4.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

I. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement of the Terms of Substance
of the Proposed Rule Change

    The Exchange proposes to modify the NYSE Arca Options Fee Schedule
(``Fee Schedule'') regarding the criteria to qualify for a posting
credit on certain Customer volume. The Exchange proposes to implement
the fee change effective November 2, 2020. The proposed rule change is
available on the Exchange's website at www.nyse.com, at the principal
office of the Exchange, and at the Commission's Public Reference Room.

II. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement of the Purpose of, and
Statutory Basis for, the Proposed Rule Change

    In its filing with the Commission, the self-regulatory organization
included statements concerning the purpose of, and basis for, the
proposed rule change and discussed any comments it received on the
proposed rule change. The text of those statements may be examined at
the places specified in Item IV below. The Exchange has prepared
summaries, set forth in sections A, B, and C below, of the most
significant parts of such statements.

A. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement of the Purpose of, and the
Statutory Basis for, the Proposed Rule Change

1. Purpose
    The purpose of this filing is to amend the Fee Schedule to modify
the criteria to qualify for a posting credit on Customer volume in
Penny Issues. The Exchange proposes to implement the rule change on
November 2, 2020.
    The Exchange currently provides several incentives for OTP Holders
and OTP Firms (collectively, ``OTPs'') designed to encourage OTPs to
direct additional order flow to the Exchange to achieve more favorable
pricing and higher credits. Among these incentives are enhanced posted
liquidity credits based on achieving certain percentages of Total
Industry Customer equity and ETF option average daily volume
(``TCADV'').\4\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \4\ TCADV includes OCC calculated Customer volume of all types,
including Complex Order Transactions and QCC transactions, in equity
and ETF options. See Endnote 8 to the Fee Schedule.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    Pursuant to the Customer Penny Posting Credit Tiers (the ``Penny
Credit Tiers''), Customer and Professional Customer orders that post
liquidity and are executed on the Exchange earn a base credit of
($0.25) per contract, and may be eligible for increased credits based
on the participant's activity. Currently, there are seven Penny Credit
Tiers, with increasing minimum volume thresholds (as well as increasing
credits) associated with each tier, ranging from per contract credits
of ($0.27) to ($0.50) for OTP Holders that achieve Tiers 1-7,
respectively.
    Currently, there are two alternative bases for an OTP Holder to
qualify for Tier 2, one of which requires the OTP to execute at least
0.25% of TCADV from Customer posted interest in all issues to earn the
associated ($0.43) per contract credit applied to electronic executions
of Customer posted interest in Penny Issues.\5\ The Exchange proposes
to increase the minimum volume threshold from 0.25% to 0.30% of TCADV
from Customer posted interest in all issues for the same ($0.43) per
contract credit.\6\ The Exchange believes this proposed change would
still encourage OTP Holders to achieve Tier 2 albeit with increased
Customer posted interest, which brings increased liquidity and order
flow for the benefit of all market participants.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \5\ The alternative Tier 2 volume threshold requires an OTP
Holder to achieve an ``[i]ncrease of at least 0.15% of TCADV in
posted interest in all issues, all account types other than Market
Maker, over the OTP Holder's or OTP Firm's March 2020 level of
posted interest in all issues, all account types other than Market
Maker.'' See Fee Schedule, NYSE Arca OPTIONS: TRADE-RELATED CHARGES
FOR STANDARD OPTIONS, CUSTOMER PENNY POSTING CREDIT.
    \6\ See proposed Fee Schedule, NYSE Arca OPTIONS: TRADE-RELATED
CHARGES FOR STANDARD OPTIONS, CUSTOMER PENNY POSTING CREDIT.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    The Exchange cannot predict with certainty whether any OTP Holders
would qualify for Tier 2 under the modified criteria; however, the
Exchange believes that OTP Holders would continue to be encouraged to
increase Customer posted volume to qualify for this Tier.
2. Statutory Basis
    The Exchange believes that the proposed rule change is consistent
with Section 6(b) of the Act,\7\ in general, and

furthers the objectives of Sections 6(b)(4) and (5) of the Act,\8\ in
particular, because it provides for the equitable allocation of
reasonable dues, fees, and other charges among its members, issuers and
other persons using its facilities and does not unfairly discriminate
between customers, issuers, brokers or dealers.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \7\ 15 U.S.C. 78f(b).
    \8\ 15 U.S.C. 78f(b)(4) and (5).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

The Proposed Rule Change Is Reasonable
    The Exchange operates in a highly competitive market. The
Commission has repeatedly expressed its preference for competition over
regulatory intervention in determining prices, products, and services
in the securities markets. In Regulation NMS, the Commission
highlighted the importance of market forces in determining prices and
SRO revenues and, also, recognized that current regulation of the
market system ``has been remarkably successful in promoting market
competition in its broader forms that are most important to investors
and listed companies.'' \9\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \9\ See Securities Exchange Act Release No. 51808 (June 9,
2005), 70 FR 37496, 37499 (June 29, 2005) (S7-10-04) (``Reg NMS
Adopting Release'').
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    There are currently 16 registered options exchanges competing for
order flow. Based on publicly-available information, and excluding
index-based options, no single exchange has more than 16% of the market
share of executed volume of multiply-listed equity and ETF options
trades.\10\ Therefore, currently no exchange possesses significant
pricing power in the execution of multiply-listed equity & ETF options
order flow. More specifically, in August 2020, the Exchange had
slightly more than 10% market share of executed volume of multiply-
listed equity & ETF options trades.\11\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \10\ The OCC publishes options and futures volume in a variety
of formats, including daily and monthly volume by exchange,
available here: https://www.theocc.com/market-data/volume/default.jsp.
    \11\ Based on OCC data, see id., the Exchange's market share in
equity-based options was 9.59% for the month of August 2019 and
10.20% for the month of August 2020.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    The Exchange believes that the ever-shifting market share among the
exchanges from month to month demonstrates that market participants can
shift order flow, or discontinue or reduce use of certain categories of
products, in response to fee changes. Accordingly, competitive forces
constrain options exchange transaction fees. Stated otherwise, changes
to exchange transaction fees and rebates can have a direct effect on
the ability of an exchange to compete for order flow, including with
options exchanges that offer similar posting credits on Electronic
Customer executions.\12\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \12\ See e.g., MIAX Pearl Fee Schedule, available here: https://www.miaxoptions.com/sites/default/files/fee_schedule-files/MIAX_PEARL_Fee_Schedule_08252020.pdf (regarding Customer Posting
Tiers).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    The Exchange believes that the proposed modification to the
criteria to qualify for Tier 2 of the Penny Credit Tiers is reasonably
designed to continue to incent OTP Holders to increase the amount and
type of Customer interest sent to the Exchange, especially posted
interest. The Exchange notes that OTP Holders are still eligible to
qualify for Penny Credit Tier 2 under the existing alternative (see
supra note 5) based on an increase over a specified benchmark in posted
interest in all issues, all account types other than Market Maker. By
continuing to provide such alternative methods to qualify for a Penny
Credit Tier, the Exchange believes the opportunities to qualify for
credits is increased, which benefits all participants through increased
volume to the Exchange.
    To the extent that the proposed change attracts to the Exchange
more Customer posted interest in both Penny and non-Penny issues, this
increased order flow would continue to make the Exchange a more
competitive venue for order execution, which, in turn, promotes just
and equitable principles of trade and removes impediments to and
perfects the mechanism of a free and open market and a national market
system.
    The Exchange cannot predict with certainty whether any OTP Holders
would qualify for Tier 2 under the modified criteria; however, the
Exchange believes that OTP Holders would continue to be encouraged to
increase Customer posted volume to qualify for this Tier.
The Proposed Rule Change Is an Equitable Allocation of Credits and Fees
    The Exchange believes the proposed rule change is an equitable
allocation of its fees and credits. The proposal is based on the amount
and type of business transacted on the Exchange and OTP Holders can opt
to avail themselves of the modified criteria to qualify for Tier 2 or
not. Moreover, the proposal is designed to incent OTP Holders to
aggregate all Customer posting interest at the Exchange as a primary
execution venue. To the extent that the proposed change attracts more
Customer posting interest to the Exchange, this increased order flow
would continue to make the Exchange a more competitive venue for, among
other things, order execution. Thus, the Exchange believes the proposed
rule change would improve market quality for all market participants on
the Exchange and, therefore, attract more order flow to the Exchange
thereby improving market-wide quality and price discovery.
The Proposed Rule Change Is Not Unfairly Discriminatory
    The Exchange believes it is not unfairly discriminatory to modify
the criteria to qualify for Tier 2 because the proposed modification
would be available to all similarly-situated market participants on an
equal and non-discriminatory basis.
    The proposal is based on the amount and type of business transacted
on the Exchange and OTP Holders are not obligated to try to achieve
Penny Credit Tier 2, as modified, nor are they obligated to execute
posted interest. Rather, the proposal is designed to encourage OTP
Holders to utilize the Exchange as a primary trading venue for Customer
posted interest (if they have not done so previously) or increase
volume sent to the Exchange. To the extent that the proposed change
attracts to the Exchange more Customer interest, including posted
interest, this increased order flow would continue to make the Exchange
a more competitive venue for order execution. Thus, the Exchange
believes the proposed rule change would improve market quality for all
market participants on the Exchange and, therefore, attract more order
flow to the Exchange thereby improving market-wide quality and price
discovery. The resulting increased volume and liquidity would provide
more trading opportunities and tighter spreads to all market
participants and thus would promote just and equitable principles of
trade, remove impediments to and perfect the mechanism of a free and
open market and a national market system and, in general, to protect
investors and the public interest.
    Finally, the Exchange believes that it is subject to significant
competitive forces, as described below in the Exchange's statement
regarding the burden on competition.

B. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement on Burden on Competition

    In accordance with Section 6(b)(8) of the Act, the Exchange does
not believe that the proposed rule change would impose any burden on
competition that is not necessary or appropriate in furtherance of the
purposes of the Act. Instead, as discussed above, the Exchange believes
that the proposed change would encourage the submission of additional
liquidity to a public

exchange, thereby promoting market depth, price discovery and
transparency and enhancing order execution opportunities for all market
participants. As a result, the Exchange believes that the proposed
change furthers the Commission's goal in adopting Regulation NMS of
fostering integrated competition among orders, which promotes ``more
efficient pricing of individual stocks for all types of orders, large
and small.'' \13\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \13\ See Reg NMS Adopting Release, supra note 9, at 37499.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    Intramarket Competition. The proposed change is designed to attract
additional order flow (particularly Customer posted interest) to the
Exchange. The Exchange believes that the proposed modification to Penny
Credit Tier 2 would continue to incent OTP Holders to direct their
Customer order flow to the Exchange. Greater liquidity benefits all
market participants on the Exchange and increased Customer order flow
would increase opportunities for execution of other trading interest.
The proposed modification would be available to all similarly-situated
market participants that execute Customer posted interest, and, as
such, the proposed change would not impose a disparate burden on
competition among market participants on the Exchange.
    Intermarket Competition. The Exchange operates in a highly
competitive market in which market participants can readily favor one
of the 16 competing option exchanges if they deem fee levels at a
particular venue to be excessive. In such an environment, the Exchange
must continually adjust its fees to remain competitive with other
exchanges and to attract order flow to the Exchange. Based on publicly-
available information, and excluding index-based options, no single
exchange has more than 16% of the market share of executed volume of
multiply-listed equity and ETF options trades.\14\ Therefore, currently
no exchange possesses significant pricing power in the execution of
multiply-listed equity & ETF options order flow. More specifically, in
August 2020, the Exchange had slightly more than 10% market share of
executed volume of multiply-listed equity & ETF options trades.\15\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \14\ The OCC publishes options and futures volume in a variety
of formats, including daily and monthly volume by exchange,
available here: https://www.theocc.com/market-data/volume/default.jsp.
    \15\ Based on OCC data, see id., the Exchange's market share in
equity-based options was 9.59% for the month of August 2019 and
10.20% for the month of August 2020.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    The Exchange believes that the proposed modification to the
criteria to qualify for Tier 2 reflects this competitive environment
because it modifies the Exchange's fees in a manner designed to incent
OTP Holders to continue to direct trading interest (particularly
Customer posted interest) to the Exchange, to provide liquidity and to
attract order flow. To the extent that this purpose is achieved, all
the Exchange's market participants should benefit from the improved
market quality and increased opportunities for price improvement.
    The Exchange believes that the proposed change could promote
competition between the Exchange and other execution venues, including
those that currently offer similar Customer posting credits, by
encouraging additional orders to be sent to the Exchange for execution.

C. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement on Comments on the Proposed
Rule Change Received From Members, Participants, or Others

    No written comments were solicited or received with respect to the
proposed rule change.

III. Date of Effectiveness of the Proposed Rule Change and Timing for
Commission Action

    The foregoing rule change is effective upon filing pursuant to
Section 19(b)(3)(A) \16\ of the Act and subparagraph (f)(2) of Rule
19b-4 \17\ thereunder, because it establishes a due, fee, or other
charge imposed by the Exchange.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \16\ 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(3)(A).
    \17\ 17 CFR 240.19b-4(f)(2).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    At any time within 60 days of the filing of such proposed rule
change, the Commission summarily may temporarily suspend such rule
change if it appears to the Commission that such action is necessary or
appropriate in the public interest, for the protection of investors, or
otherwise in furtherance of the purposes of the Act. If the Commission
takes such action, the Commission shall institute proceedings under
Section 19(b)(2)(B) \18\ of the Act to determine whether the proposed
rule change should be approved or disapproved.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \18\ 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(2)(B).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

IV. Solicitation of Comments

    Interested persons are invited to submit written data, views, and
arguments concerning the foregoing, including whether the proposed rule
change is consistent with the Act. Comments may be submitted by any of
the following methods:

Electronic Comments

     Use the Commission's internet comment form (http://www.sec.gov/rules/sro.shtml); or
     Send an email to<EMAIL_ADDRESS>Please include
File Number SR-NYSEArca-2020-96 on the subject line.

Paper Comments

     Send paper comments in triplicate to Secretary, Securities
and Exchange Commission, 100 F Street NE, Washington, DC 20549-1090.

All submissions should refer to File Number SR-NYSEArca-2020-96. This
file number should be included on the subject line if email is used. To
help the Commission process and review your comments more efficiently,
please use only one method. The Commission will post all comments on
the Commission's internet website (http://www.sec.gov/rules/sro.shtml).
Copies of the submission, all subsequent amendments, all written
statements with respect to the proposed rule change that are filed with
the Commission, and all written communications relating to the proposed
rule change between the Commission and any person, other than those
that may be withheld from the public in accordance with the provisions
of 5 U.S.C. 552, will be available for website viewing and printing in
the Commission's Public Reference Room, 100 F Street NE, Washington, DC
20549 on official business days between the hours of 10:00 a.m. and
3:00 p.m. Copies of the filing also will be available for inspection
and copying at the principal office of the Exchange. All comments
received will be posted without change. Persons submitting comments are
cautioned that we do not redact or edit personal identifying
information from comment submissions. You should submit only
information that you wish to make available publicly. All submissions
should refer to File Number SR-NYSEArca-2020-96, and should be
submitted on or before December 10, 2020.

    For the Commission, by the Division of Trading and Markets,
pursuant to delegated authority.\19\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \19\ 17 CFR 200.30-3(a)(12).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

J. Matthew DeLesDernier,
Assistant Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2020-25500 Filed 11-18-20; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 8011-01-P


[Federal Register: October 31, 2007 (Volume 72, Number 210)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Page 61509-61510]
[DOCID:fr31oc07-3]

=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION

Federal Aviation Administration

14 CFR Part 71

[Docket No. FAA-2007-28591; Airspace Docket No. 07-ASO-16]

Amendment of Class E Airspace; Scottsboro, AL

AGENCY: Federal Aviation Administration (FAA), DOT.

ACTION: Final rule.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: This action amends Class E airspace at Scottsboro, AL, to
accommodate a new Standard Instrument Approach Procedure (SIAP) that
has been developed for Scottsboro Municipal--Word Field Airport.
Additional controlled airspace is necessary for the safety and
management of Instrument Flight Rules (IFR) operations at Scottsboro
Municipal--Word Field Airport.

DATES: Effective Date: 0901 UTC, December 20, 2007. The Director of the
Federal Register approves this incorporation by reference action under
title 1, Code of Federal Regulations, part 51, subject to the annual
revision of FAA Order 7400.9 and publication of conforming amendments.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Mark. D. Ward, Manager, System Support
Group, Eastern Service Center, Federal Aviation Administration, P.O.
Box 20636, Atlanta, Georgia 30320; telephone<PHONE_NUMBER>.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

History

    On August 15, 2007, the FAA proposed to amend Title 14 Code of
Federal Regulations (14 CFR) part 71 by amending Class E airspace at
Scottsboro, AL, (72 FR 45700). This action provides adequate Class E
airspace for IFR operations at Scottsboro Municipal--Word Field
Airport, Scottsboro, AL. Designations for Class E airspace areas
extending upward from 700 feet or more above the surface of the Earth
are published in FAA Order 7400.9R, dated August 15, 2007, and
effective September 15, 2007, which is incorporated by reference in 14
CFR part 71.1. The Class E designations listed in this document will be
published subsequently in the Order.
    Interested parties were invited to participate in this rulemaking
proceeding by submitting written comments on the proposal to the FAA.
No comments objecting to the proposal were received.

The Rule

    This amendment to Title 14, Code of Federal Regulations (14 CFR)
part 71 amends Class E airspace at Scottsboro, AL, to provide
additional controlled airspace required to support new Area Navigation
(RNAV) Global Positioning System (GPS) Runway (RWY) 4 and RWY 22 SIAP
at Scottsboro Municipal--Word Field Airport.
    The FAA has determined that this proposed regulation only involves
an established body of technical regulations for which frequent and
routine amendments are necessary to keep them operationally current.
It, therefore, (1) is not a ``significant regulatory action'' under
Executive Order 12866; (2) is not a ``significant rule'' under DOT
Regulatory Policies and Procedures (44 FR 11034; February 26, 1979);
and (3) does not warrant preparation of a Regulatory Evaluation as the
anticipated impact is so minimal. Since this is a routine matter that
will only affect air traffic procedures and air navigation, it is
certified that this rule, when promulgated, will not have a significant
economic impact on a substantial number of small entities under the
criteria of the Regulatory Flexibility Act.

List of Subjects in 14 CFR Part 71

    Airspace, Incorporation by reference, Navigation (Air).

Adoption of the Amendment

0
In consideration of the foregoing, the Federal Aviation Administration
proposes to amend 14 CFR part 71 as follows:

PART 71--[AMENDED]

0
1. The authority citation for part 71 continues to read as follows:

    Authority: 49 U.S.C. 106(g); 40103, 40113, 40120; E.O. 10854, 24
FR 9565, 3 CFR, 1959-1963 Comp., p. 389.

Sec.  71.1  [Amended]

0
2. The incorporation by reference in 14 CFR 71.1 of Federal Aviation
Administration Order 7400.9R, Airspace Designations and Reporting
Points, dated August 15, 2007, and effective September 15, 2007, is
amended as follows:

Paragraph 6005 Class E airspace areas extending upward from 700
feet or more above the surface of the earth.

* * * * *

ASO AL E5 Scottsboro, AL [Revised]

Scottsboro Municipal--Word Field Airport, AL
    (Lat. 34[deg]41'19'' N., long. 86[deg]00'21'' W)
Jackson County Hospital, Point in Space Coordinates
    (Lat. 34[deg]39'47'' N, long. 86[deg]01'54'' W)

    That airspace extending upward from 700 feet above the surface
within a 6.5-mile radius of Scottsboro Municipal--Word Field Airport
and within 4 miles each side of the 037[deg] bearing from Scottsboro
Municipal--Word Field Airport extending from the 6.5-mile radius to
10.9 miles northeast of the airport and within 4 miles each side of
the 218[deg] bearing from the Scottsboro Municipal--Word Field
Airport extending from the 6.5-mile radius to 11 miles Southwest of
the airport; and that airspace within a 6-mile radius of the point
in space (lat. 34[deg]39'47'' N, long. 86[deg]01'54'' W) serving
Jackson County Hospital.
* * * * *

    Issued in College Park, Georgia, on October 5, 2007.
Lynda Otting,
Acting Manager, System Support Group, Eastern Service Center.
[FR Doc. 07-5353 Filed 10-30-07; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4910-13-M


[Federal Register Volume 82, Number 130 (Monday, July 10, 2017)]
[Notices]
[Pages 31769-31771]
[FR Doc No: 2017-14332]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission

Combined Notice of Filings #3

    Take notice that the Commission received the following electric
rate filings:

    Docket Numbers: ER10-1484-015.
    Applicants: Shell Energy North America (US), L.P.
    Description: Updated Market Power Analysis for the Northeast Region
of Shell Energy North America (US), L.P.
    Filed Date: 6/29/17.
    Accession Number: 20170629-5277.
    Comments Due: 5 p.m. ET 8/28/17.

    Docket Numbers: ER10-2718-027; ER10-2719-026; ER14-2498-006; ER14-
2500-006.
    Applicants: Cogen Technologies Linden Venture, L.P., East Coast
Power Linden Holding, L.L.C., Newark Energy Center, LLC, EIF Newark,
LLC.
    Description: Joint Triennial MBR Update and Notice of Non-Material
Change in Status of Cogen Technologies Linden Venture, L.P., et al.
    Filed Date: 6/29/17.
    Accession Number: 20170629-5281.
    Comments Due: 5 p.m. ET 8/28/17.

    Docket Numbers: ER10-2959-011; ER10-2934-010.
    Applicants: Chambers Cogeneration, Limited Partnership, Logan
Generating Company, LP.
    Description: MBR Triennial Filing of Chambers Cogeneration, Limited
Partnership, et al.
    Filed Date: 6/29/17.
    Accession Number: 20170629-5283.
    Comments Due: 5 p.m. ET 8/28/17.

    Docket Numbers: ER10-3195-005; ER10-3194-005.
    Applicants: MATEP Limited Partnership, MATEP LLC.
    Description: Updated Market Power Analysis for the Northeast Region
of MATEP Limited Partnership, et al.
    Filed Date: 6/29/17.
    Accession Number: 20170629-5280.
    Comments Due: 5 p.m. ET 8/28/17.

    Docket Numbers: ER11-2041-012; ER10-3193-011; ER11-2042-012.
    Applicants: Brooklyn Navy Yard Cogeneration Partners, L.P.,
Innovative Energy Systems, LLC, Seneca Energy II, LLC.
    Description: Joint MBR Triennial and Notice of Non-Material Change
in Status of Innovative Energy Systems, LLC, et al.
    Filed Date: 6/29/17.
    Accession Number: 20170629-5278.
    Comments Due: 5 p.m. ET 8/28/17.

    Docket Numbers: ER17-1556-001.
    Applicants: Midcontinent Independent System Operator, Inc.
    Description: Tariff Amendment: 2017-06-30_Deficiency Response to
Data Sharing with Natural Gas Pipelines to be effective 7/5/2017.
    Filed Date: 6/30/17.
    Accession Number: 20170630-5290.
    Comments Due: 5 p.m. ET 7/21/17.

    Docket Numbers: ER17-1986-000.
    Applicants: Krayn Wind LLC.
    Description: Sec.  205(d) Rate Filing: Market-Based Rate Tariff
Updates to be effective 8/28/2017.
    Filed Date: 6/30/17.
    Accession Number: 20170630-5212.
    Comments Due: 5 p.m. ET 7/21/17.

    Docket Numbers: ER17-1987-000.
    Applicants: Mustang Hills, LLC.
    Description: Sec.  205(d) Rate Filing: Market-Based Rate Tariff
Updates to be effective 8/28/2017.
    Filed Date: 6/30/17.
    Accession Number: 20170630-5213.
    Comments Due: 5 p.m. ET 7/21/17.

    Docket Numbers: ER17-1988-000.
    Applicants: Patton Wind Farm, LLC.
    Description: Sec.  205(d) Rate Filing: Market-Based Rate Tariff
Updates to be effective 8/28/2017.
    Filed Date: 6/30/17.
    Accession Number: 20170630-5214.
    Comments Due: 5 p.m. ET 7/21/17.

    Docket Numbers: ER17-1989-000.
    Applicants: Bishop Hill Energy II LLC.
    Description: Compliance filing: Bishop Hill Energy II Order No. 819
Compliance Filing to be effective 7/1/2017.
    Filed Date: 6/30/17.
    Accession Number: 20170630-5215.
    Comments Due: 5 p.m. ET 7/21/17.

    Docket Numbers: ER17-1990-000.
    Applicants: Vulcan/BN Geothermal Power Company.
    Description: Compliance filing: Vulcan-BN Geothermal Order No. 819
Compliance Filing to be effective 7/1/2017.
    Filed Date: 6/30/17.
    Accession Number: 20170630-5216.
    Comments Due: 5 p.m. ET 7/21/17.

    Docket Numbers: ER17-1991-000.
    Applicants: Cordova Energy Company LLC.
    Description: Compliance filing: Cordova Order No. 819 Compliance
Filing to be effective 7/1/2017.
    Filed Date: 6/30/17.
    Accession Number: 20170630-5217.
    Comments Due: 5 p.m. ET 7/21/17.

    Docket Numbers: ER17-1992-000.
    Applicants: Pinyon Pines Wind I, LLC.
    Description: Compliance filing: Pinyon Pines I Order No. 819
Compliance Filing to be effective 7/1/2017.
    Filed Date: 6/30/17.
    Accession Number: 20170630-5218.
    Comments Due: 5 p.m. ET 7/21/17.

    Docket Numbers: ER17-1993-000.
    Applicants: Pinyon Pines Wind II, LLC.
    Description: Compliance filing: Pinyon Pines II Order No. 819
Compliance Filing to be effective 7/1/2017.
    Filed Date: 6/30/17.
    Accession Number: 20170630-5219.
    Comments Due: 5 p.m. ET 7/21/17.

    Docket Numbers: ER17-1994-000.
    Applicants: Salton Sea Power Generation Company.
    Description: Compliance filing: Salton Sea Power Gen Order No. 819
Compliance Filing to be effective 7/1/2017.
    Filed Date: 6/30/17.
    Accession Number: 20170630-5220.
    Comments Due: 5 p.m. ET 7/21/17.

    Docket Numbers: ER17-1995-000.
    Applicants: Salton Sea Power L.L.C.
    Description: Compliance filing: Salton Sea Power LLC Order No. 819
Compliance Filing to be effective 7/1/2017.
    Filed Date: 6/30/17.
    Accession Number: 20170630-5223.
    Comments Due: 5 p.m. ET 7/21/17.

    Docket Numbers: ER17-1996-000.
    Applicants: Solar Star California XIX, LLC.
    Description: Compliance filing: Solar Star XIX Order No. 819
Compliance Filing to be effective 7/1/2017.
    Filed Date: 6/30/17.
    Accession Number: 20170630-5229.
    Comments Due: 5 p.m. ET 7/21/17.

    Docket Numbers: ER17-1997-000.
    Applicants: Solar Star California XX, LLC.
    Description: Compliance filing: Solar Star XX Order No. 819
Compliance Filing to be effective 7/1/2017.
    Filed Date: 6/30/17.
    Accession Number: 20170630-5230.
    Comments Due: 5 p.m. ET 7/21/17.

    Docket Numbers: ER17-1998-000.
    Applicants: Topaz Solar Farms LLC.
    Description: Compliance filing: Topaz Solar Farms Order No. 819
Compliance Filing to be effective 7/1/2017.
    Filed Date: 6/30/17.
    Accession Number: 20170630-5231.
    Comments Due: 5 p.m. ET 7/21/17.

    Docket Numbers: ER17-1999-000.
    Applicants: CalEnergy, LLC.
    Description: Compliance filing: CalEnergy Order No. 819 Compliance
Filing to be effective 7/1/2017.
    Filed Date: 6/30/17.
    Accession Number: 20170630-5232.

    Comments Due: 5 p.m. ET 7/21/17.

    Docket Numbers: ER17-2000-000.
    Applicants: CE Leathers Company.
    Description: Compliance filing: CE Leathers Order No. 819
Compliance Filing to be effective 7/1/2017.
    Filed Date: 6/30/17.
    Accession Number: 20170630-5233.
    Comments Due: 5 p.m. ET 7/21/17.

    Docket Numbers: ER17-2001-000.
    Applicants: Del Ranch Company.
    Description: Compliance filing: Del Ranch Order No. 819 Compliance
Filing to be effective 7/1/2017.
    Filed Date: 6/30/17.
    Accession Number: 20170630-5234.
    Comments Due: 5 p.m. ET 7/21/17.

    Docket Numbers: ER17-2002-000.
    Applicants: Elmore Company.
    Description: Compliance filing: Elmore Order No. 819 Compliance
Filing to be effective 7/1/2017.
    Filed Date: 6/30/17.
    Accession Number: 20170630-5235.
    Comments Due: 5 p.m. ET 7/21/17.

    Docket Numbers: ER17-2003-000.
    Applicants: Fish Lake Power LLC.
    Description: Compliance filing: Fish Lake Order No. 819 Compliance
Filing to be effective 7/1/2017.
    Filed Date: 6/30/17.
    Accession Number: 20170630-5236.
    Comments Due: 5 p.m. ET 7/21/17.

    Docket Numbers: ER17-2004-000.
    Applicants: Yuma Cogeneration Associates.
    Description: Compliance filing: Yuma Cogeneration Order No. 819
Compliance Filing to be effective 7/1/2017.
    Filed Date: 6/30/17.
    Accession Number: 20170630-5237.
    Comments Due: 5 p.m. ET 7/21/17.

    Docket Numbers: ER17-2005-000.
    Applicants: Marshall Wind Energy LLC.
    Description: Compliance filing: Marshall Wind Order No. 819
Compliance Filing to be effective 7/1/2017.
    Filed Date: 6/30/17.
    Accession Number: 20170630-5238.
    Comments Due: 5 p.m. ET 7/21/17.

    Docket Numbers: ER17-2006-000.
    Applicants: Grande Prairie Wind, LLC.
    Description: Compliance filing: Grande Praire Wind Order No. 819
Compliance Filing to be effective 7/1/2017.
    Filed Date: 6/30/17.
    Accession Number: 20170630-5239.
    Comments Due: 5 p.m. ET 7/21/17.

    Docket Numbers: ER17-2007-000.
    Applicants: PacifiCorp.
    Description: Compliance filing: PacifiCorp Order No. 819 Compliance
Filing to be effective 7/1/2017.
    Filed Date: 6/30/17.
    Accession Number: 20170630-5240.
    Comments Due: 5 p.m. ET 7/21/17.

    Docket Numbers: ER17-2008-000.
    Applicants: Pure Energy USA, LLC.
    Description: Baseline eTariff Filing: Market-Based Rate Tariff
Application to be effective 7/1/2017.
    Filed Date: 6/30/17.
    Accession Number: 20170630-5245.
    Comments Due: 5 p.m. ET 7/21/17.

    Docket Numbers: ER17-2009-000.
    Applicants: Tucson Electric Power Company.
    Description: Sec.  205(d) Rate Filing: Concurrence to APS RS No.
288 (TEP RS No. 337) to be effective 8/2/2017.
    Filed Date: 6/30/17.
    Accession Number: 20170630-5256.
    Comments Due: 5 p.m. ET 7/21/17.

    Docket Numbers: ER17-2010-000.
    Applicants: Arizona Public Service Company.
    Description: Sec.  205(d) Rate Filing: Service Agreement Nos. 174
and 359 to be effective 6/1/2017.
    Filed Date: 6/30/17.
    Accession Number: 20170630-5258.
    Comments Due: 5 p.m. ET 7/21/17.

    Docket Numbers: ER17-2011-000.
    Applicants: Castleton Commodities Merchant Trading L.P.
    Description: Market-Based Triennial Review Filing: Triennial Filing
2017 to be effective 7/1/2017.
    Filed Date: 6/30/17.
    Accession Number: 20170630-5260.
    Comments Due: 5 p.m. ET 8/29/17.

    Docket Numbers: ER17-2012-000.
    Applicants: Rensselaer Generating LLC.
    Description: Market-Based Triennial Review Filing: Triennial Filing
2017 to be effective 7/1/2017.
    Filed Date: 6/30/17.
    Accession Number: 20170630-5262.
    Comments Due: 5 p.m. ET 8/29/17.

    Docket Numbers: ER17-2013-000.
    Applicants: Collegiate Clean Energy, LLC.
    Description: Market-Based Triennial Review Filing: 2017 Northeast
Triennial to be effective 7/1/2017.
    Filed Date: 6/30/17.
    Accession Number: 20170630-5267.
    Comments Due: 5 p.m. ET 8/29/17.

    Docket Numbers: ER17-2014-000.
    Applicants: Ingenco Wholesale Power, L.L.C.
    Description: Market-Based Triennial Review Filing: Triennial Filing
2017 to be effective 7/1/2017.
    Filed Date: 6/30/17.
    Accession Number: 20170630-5268.
    Comments Due: 5 p.m. ET 8/29/17.

    Docket Numbers: ER17-2015-000.
    Applicants: Roseton Generating LLC.
    Description: Market-Based Triennial Review Filing: NE Triennial
2017 to be effective 7/1/2017.
    Filed Date: 6/30/17.
    Accession Number: 20170630-5272.
    Comments Due: 5 p.m. ET 8/29/17.

    Docket Numbers: ER17-2016-000.
    Applicants: Black River Hydroelectric, LLC.
    Description: Market-Based Triennial Review Filing: Northeast
Triennial and Tariff Revisions to be effective 7/1/2017.
    Filed Date: 6/30/17.
    Accession Number: 20170630-5279.
    Comments Due: 5 p.m. ET 8/29/17.

    Docket Numbers: ER17-2017-000.
    Applicants: All Dams Generation, LLC.
    Description: Market-Based Triennial Review Filing: Northeast
Triennial & Tariff Revisions to be effective 7/1/2017.
    Filed Date: 6/30/17.
    Accession Number: 20170630-5280.
    Comments Due: 5 p.m. ET 8/29/17.

    Docket Numbers: ER17-2018-000.
    Applicants: Arizona Public Service Company.
    Description: Tariff Cancellation: Cancellation of Service Agreement
No. 51741 to be effective 8/30/2017.
    Filed Date: 6/30/17.
    Accession Number: 20170630-5281.
    Comments Due: 5 p.m. ET 7/21/17.

    Docket Numbers: ER17-2019-000.
    Applicants: Lake Lynn Generation, LLC.
    Description: Market-Based Triennial Review Filing: Northeast
Triennial and Tariff Revisions to be effective 7/1/2017.
    Filed Date: 6/30/17.
    Accession Number: 20170630-5285.
    Comments Due: 5 p.m. ET 8/29/17.

    Docket Numbers: ER17-2020-000.
    Applicants: Southwest Power Pool, Inc.
    Description: Sec.  205(d) Rate Filing: South Central MCN LLC
Formula Rate to be effective 12/31/9998.
    Filed Date: 6/30/17.
    Accession Number: 20170630-5287.
    Comments Due: 5 p.m. ET 7/21/17.

    Docket Numbers: ER17-2021-000.
    Applicants: Wisconsin Electric Power Company.
    Description: Sec.  205(d) Rate Filing: Wisconsin Electric FERC
Electric Tariff Volume No. 9--2017 to be effective 9/1/2017.
    Filed Date: 6/30/17.
    Accession Number: 20170630-5288.
    Comments Due: 5 p.m. ET 7/21/17.

    Docket Numbers: ER17-2022-000.
    Applicants: PE Hydro Generation, LLC.
    Description: Market-Based Triennial Review Filing: Northeast
Triennial & Tariff Revisions to be effective 7/1/2017.

    Filed Date: 6/30/17.
    Accession Number: 20170630-5289.
    Comments Due: 5 p.m. ET 8/29/17.

    Docket Numbers: ER17-2023-000.
    Applicants: National Grid Generation LLC.
    Description: Sec.  205(d) Rate Filing: Annual Reset of Pension and
OPEB Expenses to be effective 1/1/2017.
    Filed Date: 6/30/17.
    Accession Number: 20170630-5298.
    Comments Due: 5 p.m. ET 7/21/17.

    Docket Numbers: ER17-2024-000.
    Applicants: Nevada Power Company.
    Description: Compliance filing: Market-Based Rate Tariff, Volume
No. 11 Order 819 Compliance to be effective 7/1/2017.
    Filed Date: 6/30/17.
    Accession Number: 20170630-5307.
    Comments Due: 5 p.m. ET 7/21/17.

    Docket Numbers: ER17-2025-000.
    Applicants: Sierra Pacific Power Company.
    Description: Compliance filing: Market-Based Rate Tariff Vol 7
Order 819 Compliance to be effective 7/1/2017.
    Filed Date: 6/30/17.
    Accession Number: 20170630-5311.
    Comments Due: 5 p.m. ET 7/21/17.

    The filings are accessible in the Commission's eLibrary system by
clicking on the links or querying the docket number.
    Any person desiring to intervene or protest in any of the above
proceedings must file in accordance with Rules 211 and 214 of the
Commission's Regulations (18 CFR 385.211 and 385.214) on or before 5:00
p.m. Eastern time on the specified comment date. Protests may be
considered, but intervention is necessary to become a party to the
proceeding.
    eFiling is encouraged. More detailed information relating to filing
requirements, interventions, protests, service, and qualifying
facilities filings can be found at: http://www.ferc.gov/docs-filing/efiling/filing-req.pdf. For other information, call<PHONE_NUMBER>
(toll free). For TTY, call<PHONE_NUMBER>.

    Dated: June 30, 2017.
Kimberly D. Bose,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2017-14332 Filed 7-7-17; 8:45 am]
 BILLING CODE 6717-01-P


Meeting Notes -- Abamectin FOCUS meetings
2/14/2013--With Cheminova, Nufarm, Tide, Ensystex III, Celsius Property, Tree Care Science, and Rotam
2/20/2013 -- With Syngenta
Topics Discussed:
   * Registration review schedule: reg review docket opens 6/19/13; FWP publication August 2013; DCI expected to be issued August 2014

   * Planned data requirements for abamectin's registration review
            human health:
1) immunotox -- waiver will be submitted for this study
2) subchronic inhalation toxicity--waived
3) subchronic dermal toxicity study--waived

ecological fate and effects:
1) aqueous photolysis
2) soil photolysis
3) aerobic soil metabolism
4) aerobic aquatic metabolism
5) anaerobic aquatic metabolism
6) anaerobic soil metabolism
7) 850.2100 acute oral toxicity to passerine birds
8) 850.1300 daphnia chronic toxicity
9) 850.3030 and 850.3040 field and residue effects on honeybees
10) 850.5400 algal toxicity
11) 850.4400 aquatic plant toxicity
12) oyster acute toxicity or bivalve acute toxicity
13) aquatic invertebrate acute toxicity with daphnia
14) fish acute toxicity--freshwater and marine
15) whole sediment toxicity--chronic invertebrates freshwater and marine
16) avian reproduction
17) 850.1400 early life-stage toxicity
18) seedling emergence
19) vegetative vigor

   * EPA emphasized the need for a master label table.  EPA will send a template for registrants' use
   * EPA requested production data for non-agricultural uses of abamectin -- annual usage data also helpful; especially turf and ornamental use info (on a national level)
   * EPA requested clearer labels with respect to some application parameters such as interval between applications, mimimum retreatment interval, and maximum number of applications/year, and total mass a.i. applied per year
   * EPA discussed the need for pollinator data -- perhaps from open literature or from the EU
   * EPA said registrants could submit open literature data (if available) for other data gaps
   * EPA discussed other outstanding label issues for abamectin
         o Grape REI (for inclusion on labels with use on grapes):
            "Do not enter or allow worker entry into treated areas during the restricted-entry interval (REI) of 12 hours.  Exception: For grape girdling, cane turning, and tying in grapes, do not enter or allow worker entry into treated areas during the restricted-entry interval (REI) of 4 days."

         o New environmental hazard language (for outdoor broadcast uses):
            "This pesticide is toxic to fish and wildlife.

            For terrestrial uses: do not apply directly to water, to areas where surface water is present, or to intertidal areas below the mean high water mark. Do not apply when weather conditions favor drift from target areas. Do not contaminate water when disposing of equipment wash water or rinsate. This product is highly toxic to bees exposed to direct treatment or residues on blooming crops or weeds. Do not apply this product or allow it to drift to blooming crops or weeds if bees are visiting the treatment area.

            Use of this product may pose a risk to threatened and endangered species of fish, amphibians, crustaceans (including fresh water shrimp), and insects. All use of this product in the state of California should comply with the recommendations of the California Endangered Species Project. Before using this product in California, consult with your county agriculture commissioner to determine use limitations that apply in your area.

            This product may impact surface water quality due to runoff of rain water. This is especially true for poorly draining soils and soils with shallow ground water. This product is classified as having a medium potential for reaching both surface water and aquatic sediment via runoff for several weeks to months after application. A level, well maintained vegetative buffer strip between areas to which this product is applied and surface water features such as ponds, streams, and springs will reduce the potential loading of abamectin from runoff water and sediment. Runoff of this product will be reduced by avoiding applications when rainfall is forecast to occur within 48 hours."

         o How to express quantities and maximum on labels for fire ant bait/granules:
            Here are some of the directions showing how to express the rates per mound, per acre, when to use each, and the ultimate limit.  This is taken from reg num 100-894 which is a 0.011% granular.  We've expressed limits as lb a.i. but you could translate to quantity of product (eg. 1 lb product/A).  This is for a commercial use; if using residential landscapes then you can leave the buffer strip text off.  There are other directions on this particular label, we've just excerpted some parts.

            MOUND TREATMENT
            -  Use 5  - 7 tablespoons per fire ant mound.  Sprinkle the bait uniformly in a circle around the base of the mound out to a distance of approximately 2 to 4 feet.

            - Maximum Amount per Application:  Do not treat more than 12 ant mounds per acre.  If there are more than 12 mounds per acre to be treated then follow broadcast application directions.  (We came up with the 12 mound limit by converting the 7Tbl per mound to a net a.i. per X square feet and found that if you went beyond the 12 mounds you'd be over the 0.01 lb a.i./A limit.)

            BROADCAST TREATMENT
            -  Apply 0.00011 lb a.i./A using ground or aerial application.

            RESTRICTIONS
            -  Buffer zone: To avoid hazard to aquatic organisms, do not apply within 25 feet of lakes, reservoirs, rivers, permanent streams, marshes, potholes, natural ponds, estuaries, or commercial fish ponds.

            -  Maximum Amount per Application: Do not apply more than .00011 lb a.i. per acre per application.

            -  Application Interval: When reinfestation occurs or when very large mounds remain active, areas may be retreated 3 to 4 months after the previous application; however do not exceed the maximum amount permitted per year.

            -  Maximum Amount per Year: Do not apply more than 4 applications per acre per year (0.00044 lb a.i. per acre per year).


[ Federal Register: December 29, 2004 ( Volume 69, Number 249)] [ Notices] [ Page 78016 78017] From the Federal Register Online via GPO Access [ wais. access. gpo. gov] [ DOCID: fr29de04 92]   ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY [ OPP 2004 0396; FRL 7690 1] Pesticide Products; Registration Approval AGENCY: Environmental Protection Agency ( EPA). ACTION: Notice.   SUMMARY: This notice announces Agency approval of applications to register the following pesticide products containing active ingredients not included in any previously registered products pursuant to the provisions of section 3( c)( 5) of the Federal Insecticide, Fungicide, and Rodenticide Act ( FIFRA), as amended:    Olive Fly Attract and Kill ( A& K) Target Device for Commercial Olives'' and    Olive Fly Attract and Kill ( A& K) Target Device for Ornamental Olives'' containing ammonium bicarbonate;    Sonata ASO'' and    QST 2808 MUP'' containing Bacillus pumilus strain QST 2808; and    BIOMITE'' containing citronellol. FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: The Regulatory Action Leader, Biopesticides and Pollution Prevention Division ( 7511C), listed in the table in this unit:   Telephone number/ e mail Chemical/ Reg. Regulatory Action Leader address Mailing address Number   Andrew Bryceland ( 703) 305 9268; Biopesticides and Ammonium bryceland. andrew@ epa. gov. Pollution Prevention bicarbonate Division ( 7511C), Office 70051 76 of Pesticides Programs, 70051 96 Environmental Protection Agency, 1200 Pennsylvania Ave., NW., Washington, DC 20460 0001  Barbara Mandula ( 703) 308 7378; Do. B. pumilus strain mandula. barbara@ epa. gov.. QST 2808 69592 13 69592 6  Raderrio Wilkins ( 703) 308 1259; Do. Citronellol wilkins. raderrio@ epa. gov. 70057 1   SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: I. General Information A. Does this Action Apply to Me? You may be potentially affected by this action if you are an agricultural producer, food manufacturer or pesticide manufacturer. Potentially affected entities may include, but are not limited to: Crop production/ Agriculture ( NAICS 111) Animal production ( NAICS 112) Food manufacturing ( NAICS 311) Pesticide manufacturing ( NAICS 32532). This listing is not intended to be exhaustive, but rather provides a guide for readers regarding entities likely to be affected by this action. Other types of entities not listed in this unit could also be affected. The North American Industrial Classification System ( NAICS) codes have been provided to assist you and others in determining whether this action might apply to certain entities. To determine whether you or your business may be affected by this action, you should carefully examine the applicability provisions. If you have any questions regarding the applicability of this action to a particular entity, consult the person listed under FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT. B. How Can I Get Copies of this Document and Other Related Information? 1. Docket. EPA has established an official public docket for this action under docket identification ( ID) number OPP 2004 0396. The official public docket consists of the documents specifically referenced in this action, any public comments received, and other information related to this action. Although a part of the official docket, the public docket does not include Confidential Business Information ( CBI) or other information whose disclosure is restricted by statute. The official public docket is the collection of materials that is available for public viewing at the Public Information and Records Integrity Branch ( PIRIB), Rm. 119, Crystal Mall 2, 1801 S. Bell St., Arlington, VA. This docket facility is open from 8: 30 a. m. to 4 p. m., Monday through Friday, excluding legal holidays. The docket telephone number is ( 703) 305 5805. In accordance with section 3( c)( 2) of FIFRA, a copy of the approved label, the list of data references, the data and other scientific information used to support registration, except for material specifically protected by section 10 of FIFRA, are also available for public inspection. Requests for data must be made in accordance with the provisions of the Freedom of Information Act and must be addressed to the Freedom of Information Office ( A 101), 1200 Pennsylvania Ave., NW., Washington, DC 20460 0001. The request should: Identify the product name and registration number and specify the data or information desired. A paper copy of the fact sheet, which provides more detail on this registration, may be obtained from the National Technical Information Service ( NTIS), 5285 Port Royal Rd., Springfield, VA 22161. 2. Electronic access. You may access this Federal Register document electronically through the EPA Internet under the    Federal Register'' listings at http:// www. epa. gov/ fedrgstr/. An electronic version of the public docket is available through EPA's electronic public docket and comment system, EPA Dockets. You may use EPA Dockets at http:// www. epa. gov/ edocket/ to submit or view public comments, access the index listing of the contents of the official public docket, and to access those documents in the public docket that are available electronically. Although not all docket materials may [[ Page 78017]] be available electronically, you may still access any of the publicly available docket materials through the docket facility identified in Unit I. B. 1. Once in the system, select    search,'' then key in the appropriate docket ID number. II. Did EPA Approve the Applications? The Agency approved the applications after considering all required data on risks associated with the proposed uses of Ammonium Bicarbonate; B. Pumilus strain QST 2808; Citronellol, and information on social, economic, and environmental benefits to be derived from use. Specifically, the Agency has considered the nature of the chemical and its pattern of use, application methods and rates, and level and extent of potential exposure. Based on these reviews, the Agency was able to make basic health and safety determinations which show that use of Ammonium Bicarbonate; B. Pumilus strain QST 2808; Citronellol when used in accordance with widespread and commonly recognized practice, will not generally cause unreasonable adverse effects to the environment. III. Approved Applications 1. EPA issued a notice, published in the Federal Register of March 28, 2002 ( 67 FR 14943) ( FRL 6827 7), which announced that Thermo Trilogy Corporation, Guilford Road, Suite 175, Columbia, MD 21046, had submitted an application to register the pesticide product, Olive Fly Attract and Kill ( A& K) Target Device, an olive fly attractant ( EPA File Symbol 70051 TA), containing 12.8% ammonium bicarbonate and 0.2% dioxaspiro 5,5) undecane ( Spiroketal). This product was not previously registered. The application was approved on June 10, 2004, as    Olive Fly Attract and Kill ( A& K) Target Device for Commercial Olives'' ( EPA Reg. No. 70051 76) and    Olive Fly Attract and Kill ( A& K) Target Device for Ornamental Olives'' ( EPA Reg. No. 70051 96) for control of olive flies in olive orchards. 2. EPA issued a notice, published in the Federal Register of May 8, 2002 ( 67 FR 30917) ( FRL 6829 7), which announced that AgraQuest, Inc, 1530 Drew Avenue, Davis, CA 95616, had submitted an application to register the pesticide product, QST 2808 Technical ( later renamed QST 2808 MUP), as a fungicide ( EPA File Symbol 69592 A)), containing spores of B. pumilus strain QST 2808. This product was not previously registered. The application was approved on October 14, 2004 for two products: The end use product Sonata\ TM\ ASO ( EPA Reg. No. 69592 13), containing 1.38% of active ingredient by weight, for control of various fungal diseases on crops; and QST 2808 MUP ( EPA Reg. No. 69592 6), containing 1.42% of active ingredient by weight, for manufacturing the end use product. 3. EPA issued a notice, published in the Federal Register of August 28, 2002 ( 67 FR 55234) ( FRL 7193 7) which announced that Natural Plant Protection, c/ o Technology Science Group, Inc., 4061 North 156\ th\ Drive, Goodyear, AZ 85338, had submitted an application to register the pesticide product, Biomite\ TM\, a mite attractant ( EPA File Symbol 70057 R), containing 0.417% citronellol. The product also contains three other registered active ingredients: Geraniol ( 2 trans 3,7 dimethyl 2,6 octadien 1 ol), Nerolidol ( 3,7,11 trimethyl 1,6,10 dodecatrien 3 ol), and Farnesol ( 3,7,11 trimethyl 2,6,10 dodecatrien 1 ol). This product was not previously registered. The application was approved on April 20, 2004, as BioMite\ TM\ ( EPA Reg. No. 70057 1) for use against mites on agricultural crops, ornamental plants, and in professional landscape settings. List of Subjects Environmental protection, Chemicals, Pesticides and pests. Dated: December 14, 2004. Janet L. Andersen, Director, Biopesticides and Pollution Prevention Division, Office of Pesticide Programs. [ FR Doc. 04 28202 Filed 12 28 04; 8: 45 am] BILLING CODE 6560 50 S


[Federal Register: September 17, 2010 (Volume 75, Number 180)]
[Notices]
[Page 57100-57102]
[DOCID:fr17se10-146]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

[Release No. 34-62897; File No. SR-CBOE-2010-083]

Self-Regulatory Organizations; Chicago Board Options Exchange,
Incorporated; Notice of Filing and Immediate Effectiveness of Proposed
Rule Change Related to the Complex Order Book

September 13, 2010.
    Pursuant to Section 19(b)(1) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934
(the ``Act''),\1\ and Rule 19b-4 thereunder,\2\ notice is hereby given
that on September 9, 2010, the Chicago Board Options Exchange,
Incorporated (``Exchange'' or ``CBOE'') filed with the Securities and
Exchange Commission (the ``Commission'') the proposed rule change as
described in Items I and II

below, which Items have been prepared by the Exchange. The Exchange
filed the proposal as a ``non-controversial'' proposed rule change
pursuant to Section 19(b)(3)(A)(iii) of the Act \3\ and Rule 19b-
4(f)(6) thereunder.\4\ The Commission is publishing this notice to
solicit comments on the proposed rule change from interested persons.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \1\ 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(1).
    \2\ 17 CFR 240.19b-4.
    \3\ 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(3)(A)(iii).
    \4\ 17 CFR 240.19b-4(f)(6).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

I. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement of the Terms of Substance
of the Proposed Rule Change

    The Exchange proposes to amend CBOE Rule 6.53C, Complex Orders on
the Hybrid System, to incorporate a provision related to option classes
in which the electronic complex order book (``COB'') is activated. The
text of the proposed rule change is available on the Exchange's Web
site (http://www.cboe.org/Legal), at the Exchange's Office of the
Secretary and at the Commission.

II. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement of the Purpose of, and
Statutory Basis for, the Proposed Rule Change

    In its filing with the Commission, the self-regulatory organization
included statements concerning the purpose of and basis for the
proposed rule change and discussed any comments it received on the
proposed rule change. The text of those statements may be examined at
the places specified in Item IV below. The Exchange has prepared
summaries, set forth in sections A, B, and C below, of the most
significant parts of such statements.

A. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement of the Purpose of, and the
Statutory Basis for, the Proposed Rule Change

1. Purpose
    CBOE Rule 6.53C governs the operation of the Exchange's electronic
COB system. The purpose of this proposed rule change is to incorporate
a provision to provide the Exchange with additional flexibility to
determine the applicable matching algorithm \5\ for option classes in
which COB is activated. Currently, Rule 6.53C(c)(ii)(2) specifies that
the allocation of complex orders within COB shall be pursuant to the
rules of trading priority otherwise applicable to incoming electronic
orders in the individual component legs, and Rule 6.53C(iii)(3)
specifies that the allocation of complex orders among market
participants that submit orders or quotes to trade against the COB
shall be pursuant to paragraph (c) of Rule 6.45A or Rule 6.45B, as
applicable.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \5\ The matching algorithms include price-time, pro-rata, and
the ultimate matching algorithm (``UMA'') base priorities and a
combination of various optional priority overlays pertaining to
public customer priority, Market-Maker participation entitlements,
small order preference, and market turner. See Rules 6.45A, Priority
and Allocation of Equity Option Trades on the CBOE Hybrid System,
and 6.45B, Priority and Allocation of Trades in Index Options and
Options on ETFs on the CBOE Hybrid System.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    This filing proposes to provide the Exchange with additional
flexibility regarding the allocation to permit the matching algorithm
in effect for COB to be different from the matching algorithm in effect
for the option class. Specifically, we are proposing that the Exchange
may determine on a class-by-class basis which electronic matching
algorithm shall apply to COB executions. Pursuant to Rule 6.53C.01, all
pronouncements regarding COB matching algorithm determinations by the
Exchange will be announced to CBOE Trading Permit Holders via
Regulatory Circular.
    The matching algorithm applied to COB for each option class will
continue to be pursuant to Rule 6.45A or 6.45B, as applicable. Thus,
the Exchange is not creating any new algorithms for COB, but is
amending Rule 6.53C to provide the flexibility to choose an algorithm
from among the existing algorithms to be applied to COB rather than
simply defaulting to the algorithm in effect for an option class. All
other aspects of COB pursuant to Rule 6.53C shall apply unchanged.
2. Statutory Basis
    The basis under the Act for this proposed rule change is the
requirement under Section 6(b)(5) \6\ that an exchange have rules that
are designed to promote just and equitable principles of trade, and to
remove impediments to and perfect the mechanism for a free and open
market and a national market system, and, in general, to protect
investors and the public interest. In particular, the Exchange believes
the proposed change would provide more flexibility for the Exchange to
designate the matching algorithm for COB in a manner that is consistent
with existing CBOE rules.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \6\ 15 U.S.C. 78f(b)(5).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

B. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement on Burden on Competition

    CBOE does not believe that the proposed rule change will impose any
burden on competition not necessary or appropriate in furtherance of
the purposes of the Act.

C. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement on Comments on the Proposed
Rule Change Received From Members, Participants, or Others

    The Exchange neither solicited nor received comments on the
proposal.

III. Date of Effectiveness of the Proposed Rule Change and Timing for
Commission Action

    Because the foregoing rule does not (i) Significantly affect the
protection of investors or the public interest; (ii) impose any
significant burden on competition; and (iii) become operative for 30
days from the date on which it was filed, or such shorter time as the
Commission may designate if consistent with the protection of investors
and the public interest, provided that the self-regulatory organization
has given the Commission written notice of its intent to file the
proposed rule change at least five business days prior to the date of
filing of the proposed rule change or such shorter time as designated
by the Commission, the proposed rule change has become effective
pursuant to Section 19(b)(3)(A) of the Act \7\ and Rule 19b-4(f)(6)
thereunder.\8\ At any time within 60 days of the filing of such
proposed rule change, the Commission summarily may temporarily suspend
such rule change if it appears to the Commission that such action is
necessary or appropriate in the public interest, for the protection of
investors, or otherwise in furtherance of the purposes of the Act.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \7\ 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(3)(A).
    \8\ 17 CFR 240.19b-4(f)(6). In addition, Rule 19b-4(f)(6)(iii)
requires a self-regulatory organization submit to the Commission
written notice of its intent to file the proposed rule change, along
with a brief description and text of the proposed rule change, at
least five business days prior to the filing of the proposed rule
change, or such shorter time as designated by the Commission. The
Commission notes that the Exchange has satisfied this requirement.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

IV. Solicitation of Comments

    Interested persons are invited to submit written data, views, and
arguments concerning the foregoing, including whether the proposed rule
change is consistent with the Act. Comments may be submitted by any of
the following methods:

Electronic Comments

     Use the Commission's Internet comment form (http://
www.sec.gov/rules/sro.shtml); or
     Send an e-mail to<EMAIL_ADDRESS>Please include
File Number SR-CBOE-2010-083 on the subject line.

Paper Comments

     Send paper comments in triplicate to Elizabeth M. Murphy,
Secretary, Securities and Exchange Commission, 100 F Street, NE.,
Washington, DC 20549-1090.

All submissions should refer to File Number SR-CBOE-2010-083. This file
number should be included on the subject line if e-mail is used. To
help the Commission process and review your comments more efficiently,
please use only one method. The Commission will post all comments on
the Commission's Internet website (http://www.sec.gov/rules/sro.shtml).
Copies of the submission, all subsequent amendments, all written
statements with respect to the proposed rule change that are filed with
the Commission, and all written communications relating to the proposed
rule change between the Commission and any person, other than those
that may be withheld from the public in accordance with the provisions
of 5 U.S.C. 552, will be available for website viewing and printing in
the Commission's Public Reference Room, 100 F Street, NE., Washington,
DC 20549, on official business days between the hours of 10 a.m. and 3
p.m. Copies of the filing also will be available for inspection and
copying at the principal office of the Exchange. All comments received
will be posted without change; the Commission does not edit personal
identifying information from submissions. You should submit only
information that you wish to make available publicly. All submissions
should refer to File Number SR-CBOE-2010-083 and should be submitted on
or before October 8, 2010.

    For the Commission, by the Division of Trading and Markets,
pursuant to delegated authority.\9\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \9\ 17 CFR 200.30-3(a)(12).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

Florence E. Harmon,
Deputy Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2010-23297 Filed 9-16-10; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 8010-01-P


[Federal Register Volume 76, Number 20 (Monday, January 31, 2011)]
[Proposed Rules]
[Pages 5298-5300]
[FR Doc No: 2011-2007]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION

Federal Aviation Administration

14 CFR Part 39

[Docket No. FAA-2011-0088; Directorate Identifier 2010-CE-072-AD]
RIN 2120-AA64

Airworthiness Directives; Empresa Brasileira de Aeronautica S.A.
(EMBRAER) Model EMB-500 Airplanes

AGENCY: Federal Aviation Administration (FAA), Department of
Transportation (DOT).

ACTION: Notice of proposed rulemaking (NPRM).

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: We propose to adopt a new airworthiness directive (AD) for the
products listed above. This proposed AD results from mandatory
continuing airworthiness information (MCAI) originated by an aviation
authority of another country to identify and correct an unsafe
condition on an aviation product. The MCAI describes the unsafe
condition as:

    It has been found that moisture may accumulate and freeze, under
certain conditions, in the gap between the AOA vane base assembly
and the stationary ring of the sensor's body. If freezing occurs
both AOA sensors may get stuck and the Stall Warning Protection
System (SWPS) will be no longer effective without alerting. This may
result in inadvertent aerodynamic stall and loss of controllability
of the airplane.

The proposed AD would require actions that are intended to address the
unsafe condition described in the MCAI.

DATES: We must receive comments on this proposed AD by March 17, 2011.

ADDRESSES: You may send comments by any of the following methods:
     Federal eRulemaking Portal: Go to http://www.regulations.gov. Follow the instructions for submitting comments.
     Fax:<PHONE_NUMBER>.
     Mail: U.S. Department of Transportation, Docket
Operations, M-30, West Building Ground Floor, Room W12-140, 1200 New
Jersey Avenue, SE., Washington, DC 20590.
     Hand Delivery: U.S. Department of Transportation, Docket
Operations, M-30, West Building Ground Floor, Room W12-140, 1200 New
Jersey Avenue, SE., Washington, DC 20590, between 9 a.m. and 5 p.m.,
Monday through Friday, except Federal holidays.
    For service information identified in this proposed AD, contact
EMBRAER Empresa Brasileira de Aeron[aacute]utica S.A., Phenom
Maintenance Support, Av. Brig. Farina Lima, 2170, Sao Jose dos Campos--
SP, CEP: 12227-901--PO Box: 36/2, BRASIL; telephone: ++55 12 3927-5383;
fax: ++55 12 3927-2619; E-mail<EMAIL_ADDRESS>
Internet: http://www.embraer.com.br. You may review copies of the
referenced service information at the FAA, Small Airplane Directorate,
901 Locust, Kansas City, Missouri 64106. For information on the
availability of this material at the FAA, call<PHONE_NUMBER>.

Examining the AD Docket

    You may examine the AD docket on the Internet at http://www.regulations.gov; or in person at the Docket Management Facility
between 9 a.m. and 5 p.m., Monday through Friday, except Federal
holidays. The AD docket contains this proposed AD, the regulatory
evaluation, any comments received, and other information. The street
address for the Docket Office (telephone<PHONE_NUMBER>) is in the
ADDRESSES section. Comments will be available in the AD docket shortly
after receipt.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Jim Rutherford, Aerospace Engineer,
FAA, Small Airplane Directorate, 901 Locust, Room 301, Kansas City,
Missouri 64106; telephone:<PHONE_NUMBER>; fax:<PHONE_NUMBER>.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

Comments Invited

    We invite you to send any written relevant data, views, or
arguments about this proposed AD. Send your comments to an address
listed under the ADDRESSES section. Include ``Docket No. FAA-2011-0088;
Directorate Identifier 2010-CE-072-AD'' at the beginning of your
comments. We specifically invite comments on the overall regulatory,
economic, environmental, and energy aspects of this proposed AD. We
will consider all comments received by the closing date and may amend
this proposed AD because of those comments.
    We will post all comments we receive, without change, to http://www.regulations.gov, including any personal information you provide. We
will also post a report summarizing each substantive verbal contact we
receive about this proposed AD.

Discussion

    The AG[Ecirc]NCIA NACIONAL DE AVIA[Ccedil][Atilde]O CIVIL--BRAZIL
(ANAC), which is the aviation authority for Brazil, has issued AD No.:
2010-11-01, dated December 20, 2010 (referred to after this as ``the
MCAI''), to correct an unsafe condition for the specified products. The
MCAI states:

    It has been found that moisture may accumulate and freeze, under
certain conditions, in the gap between the AOA vane base assembly
and the stationary ring of the sensor's body. If freezing occurs
both AOA sensors may get stuck and the Stall Warning Protection
System (SWPS) will be no longer effective without alerting. This may
result in inadvertent aerodynamic stall and loss of controllability
of the airplane.
    Since this condition may occur in other airplanes of the same
type and affects flight safety, a corrective action is required.
Thus, sufficient reason exists to request compliance with this AD in
the indicated time limit.

The MCAI requires replacement of both Angle of Attack (AOA) sensors and
cover plates. You may obtain further information by examining the MCAI
in the AD docket.

Relevant Service Information

    EMBRAER has issued PHENOM Service Bulletin SB No.: 500-27-0006,
dated September 2, 2010, and PHENOM Service Bulletin SB No.: 500-27-
0006, Revision No.: 01, dated November 29, 2010. The actions described
in this service information are intended to correct the unsafe
condition identified in the MCAI.

FAA's Determination and Requirements of the Proposed AD

    This product has been approved by the aviation authority of another

country, and is approved for operation in the United States. Pursuant
to our bilateral agreement with this State of Design Authority, they
have notified us of the unsafe condition described in the MCAI and
service information referenced above. We are proposing this AD because
we evaluated all information and determined the unsafe condition exists
and is likely to exist or develop on other products of the same type
design.

Differences Between This Proposed AD and the MCAI or Service
Information

    We have reviewed the MCAI and related service information and, in
general, agree with their substance. But we might have found it
necessary to use different words from those in the MCAI to ensure the
AD is clear for U.S. operators and is enforceable. In making these
changes, we do not intend to differ substantively from the information
provided in the MCAI and related service information.
    We might also have proposed different actions in this AD from those
in the MCAI in order to follow FAA policies. Any such differences are
highlighted in a NOTE within the proposed AD.

Costs of Compliance

    We estimate that this proposed AD will affect 89 products of U.S.
registry. We also estimate that it would take about 7.5 work-hours per
product to comply with the basic requirements of this proposed AD. The
average labor rate is $85 per work-hour. Required parts would cost
about $1,550 per product.
    Based on these figures, we estimate the cost of the proposed AD on
U.S. operators to be $194,687.50, or $2,187.50 per product.

Authority for This Rulemaking

    Title 49 of the United States Code specifies the FAA's authority to
issue rules on aviation safety. Subtitle I, section 106, describes the
authority of the FAA Administrator. ``Subtitle VII: Aviation
Programs,'' describes in more detail the scope of the Agency's
authority.
    We are issuing this rulemaking under the authority described in
``Subtitle VII, Part A, Subpart III, Section 44701: General
requirements.'' Under that section, Congress charges the FAA with
promoting safe flight of civil aircraft in air commerce by prescribing
regulations for practices, methods, and procedures the Administrator
finds necessary for safety in air commerce. This regulation is within
the scope of that authority because it addresses an unsafe condition
that is likely to exist or develop on products identified in this
rulemaking action.

Regulatory Findings

    We determined that this proposed AD would not have federalism
implications under Executive Order 13132. This proposed AD would not
have a substantial direct effect on the States, on the relationship
between the national Government and the States, or on the distribution
of power and responsibilities among the various levels of government.
    For the reasons discussed above, I certify this proposed
regulation:
    1. Is not a ``significant regulatory action'' under Executive Order
12866;
    2. Is not a ``significant rule'' under the DOT Regulatory Policies
and Procedures (44 FR 11034, February 26, 1979); and
    3. Will not have a significant economic impact, positive or
negative, on a substantial number of small entities under the criteria
of the Regulatory Flexibility Act.
    We prepared a regulatory evaluation of the estimated costs to
comply with this proposed AD and placed it in the AD docket.

List of Subjects in 14 CFR Part 39

    Air transportation, Aircraft, Aviation safety, Incorporation by
reference, Safety.

The Proposed Amendment

    Accordingly, under the authority delegated to me by the
Administrator, the FAA proposes to amend 14 CFR part 39 as follows:

PART 39--AIRWORTHINESS DIRECTIVES

    1. The authority citation for part 39 continues to read as follows:

    Authority: 49 U.S.C. 106(g), 40113, 44701.

Sec.  39.13  [Amended]

    2. The FAA amends Sec.  39.13 by adding the following new AD:

Empresa Brasileira de Aeronautica S.A. (EMBRAER): Docket No. FAA-
2011-0088; Directorate Identifier 2010-CE-072-AD.

Comments Due Date

    (a) We must receive comments by March 17, 2011.

Affected ADs

    (b) None.

Applicability

    (c) This AD applies to Empresa Brasileira de Aeronautica S.A.
(EMBRAER) EMB-500 airplanes, serial numbers 50000005 through
50000119, 50000121 through 50000130, 50000132 through 50000134,
50000136, 50000137, 50000139, 50000141 through 50000158, 50000160
through 50000162, 50000164, 50000165, 50000167 through 50000175,
50000177, and 50000178, that are:
    (1) Certificated in any category; and
    (2) Equipped with Angle of Attack (AOA) sensors, part number (P/
N) C-100117-2 and cover plates P/N 500-01702-401 and/or P/N 500-
01702-402.

Subject

    (d) Air Transport Association of America (ATA) Code 27: Flight
Controls.

Reason

    (e) The mandatory continuing airworthiness information (MCAI)
states:

    It has been found that moisture may accumulate and freeze, under
certain conditions, in the gap between the AOA vane base assembly
and the stationary ring of the sensor's body. If freezing occurs
both AOA sensors may get stuck and the Stall Warning Protection
System (SWPS) will be no longer effective without alerting. This may
result in inadvertent aerodynamic stall and loss of controllability
of the airplane.
    Since this condition may occur in other airplanes of the same
type and affects flight safety, a corrective action is required.
Thus, sufficient reason exists to request compliance with this AD in
the indicated time limit.

The MCAI requires replacement of both AOA sensors and cover plates.

Actions and Compliance

    (f) Unless already done, within 300 hours time-in-service (TIS)
after the effective date of this AD or within 12 months after the
effective date of this AD, whichever comes first, do the following
actions following PHENOM Service Bulletin SB No.: 500-27-0006,
Revision No.: 01, dated November 29, 2010:
    (1) Replace the left hand (LH) and the right hand (RH) AOA
sensors P/N C-100117-2 with LH and RH AOA sensors P/N C-100117-3.
    (2) Replace the LH cover plate P/N 500-01702-401 and the RH
cover plate P/N 500-01702-402 with LH cover plate P/N 500-01702-403
and RH cover plate P/N 500-01702-404.
    (3) We will allow ``unless already done'' credit for corrective
actions already done, before the effective date of this AD,
following PHENOM Service Bulletin SB No.: 500-27-0006, dated
September 2, 2010, for compliance with the requirements of this AD.

FAA AD Differences

    Note: This AD differs from the MCAI and/or service information
as follows: No differences.

Other FAA AD Provisions

    (g) The following provisions also apply to this AD:
    (1) Alternative Methods of Compliance (AMOCs): The Manager,
Standards Office, FAA, has the authority to approve AMOCs for this
AD, if requested using the procedures found in 14 CFR 39.19. Send
information to ATTN: Jim Rutherford, Aerospace Engineer, FAA, Small
Airplane Directorate, 901 Locust, Room 301, Kansas City, Missouri
64106;

telephone:<PHONE_NUMBER>; fax:<PHONE_NUMBER>. Before using any
approved AMOC on any airplane to which the AMOC applies, notify your
appropriate principal inspector (PI) in the FAA Flight Standards
District Office (FSDO), or lacking a PI, your local FSDO.
    (2) Airworthy Product: For any requirement in this AD to obtain
corrective actions from a manufacturer or other source, use these
actions if they are FAA-approved. Corrective actions are considered
FAA-approved if they are approved by the State of Design Authority
(or their delegated agent). You are required to assure the product
is airworthy before it is returned to service.
    (3) Reporting Requirements: For any reporting requirement in
this AD, a Federal agency may not conduct or sponsor, and a person
is not required to respond to, nor shall a person be subject to a
penalty for failure to comply with a collection of information
subject to the requirements of the Paperwork Reduction Act unless
that collection of information displays a current valid OMB Control
Number. The OMB Control Number for this information collection is
2120-0056. Public reporting for this collection of information is
estimated to be approximately 5 minutes per response, including the
time for reviewing instructions, completing and reviewing the
collection of information. All responses to this collection of
information are mandatory. Comments concerning the accuracy of this
burden and suggestions for reducing the burden should be directed to
the FAA at: 800 Independence Ave. SW., Washington, DC 20591, Attn:
Information Collection Clearance Officer, AES-200.

Related Information

    (h) Refer to MCAI AG[Ecirc]NCIA NACIONAL DE
AVIA[Ccedil][Atilde]O CIVIL--BRAZIL (ANAC), AD No.: 2010-11-01,
dated December 20, 2010; and PHENOM Service Bulletin SB No.: 500-27-
0006, dated September 2, 2010, and PHENOM Service Bulletin SB No.:
500-27-0006, Revision No.: 01, dated November 29, 2010, for related
information. For service information related to this AD, contact
EMBRAER Empresa Brasileira de Aeron[aacute]utica S.A., Phenom
Maintenance Support, Av. Brig. Farina Lima, 2170, Sao Jose dos
Campos-SP, CEP: 12227-901--PO Box: 36/2, BRASIL; telephone: ++55 12
3927-5383; fax: ++55 12 3927-2619; E-mail:
<EMAIL_ADDRESS>Internet: http://www.embraer.com.br. You may review copies of the referenced service
information at the FAA, Small Airplane Directorate, 901 Locust,
Kansas City, Missouri 64106. For information on the availability of
this material at the FAA, call<PHONE_NUMBER>.

    Issued in Kansas City, Missouri, on January 24, 2011.
John Colomy,
Acting Manager, Small Airplane Directorate,
    Aircraft Certification Service.
[FR Doc. 2011-2007 Filed 1-28-11; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910-13-P