[Federal Register Volume 85, Number 249 (Tuesday, December 29, 2020)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Pages 85520-85523]
[FR Doc No: 2020-28874]

=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY

Coast Guard

33 CFR Part 165

[Docket No. USCG-2020-0719]
RIN 1625-AA00

Safety Zone; Oakland Ship-to-Shore Crane Arrival, San Francisco
Bay, Oakland, CA

AGENCY: Coast Guard, DHS.

ACTION: Temporary final rule.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Coast Guard is establishing a temporary safety zone on the
navigable waters of the San Francisco Bay during the transit of the M/V
ZHEN HUA 35, scheduled to arrive between December 24, 2020 and January
10, 2021. This safety zone is necessary to protect personnel, vessels,
and the marine environment from hazards associated with the arms of
three ship-to-shore gantry cranes, which will extend more than 200 feet
out from the transiting vessel when the arms are lowered, and from the
vessel's stability condition due to an air draft greater than 300 feet
when the cranes are in the up position. Unauthorized persons or vessels
are prohibited from entering into, transiting through, or remaining in
the safety zone without permission of the Captain of the Port San
Francisco or a designated representative.

DATES: This rule is effective without actual notice from December 29,
2020 through 11:59 p.m. on January 10, 2021. For the purposes of
enforcement, actual notice will be used from 12:01 a.m. December 24,
2020 through December 29, 2020.

ADDRESSES: To view documents mentioned in this preamble as being
available in the docket, go to https://www.regulations.gov, type USCG-
2020-0719 in the ``SEARCH'' box and click ``SEARCH.'' Click on Open
Docket Folder on the line associated with this rule.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: If you have questions on this rule,
call or email LT Anthony Solares, Waterways Management, U.S. Coast
Guard; telephone<PHONE_NUMBER>, email<EMAIL_ADDRESS>
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

I. Table of Abbreviations

CFR Code of Federal Regulations
COTP Captain of the Port San Francisco
DHS Department of Homeland Security
Sec.  Section
U.S.C. United States Code

II. Background Information and Regulatory History

    The Coast Guard is issuing this temporary rule without prior notice
and opportunity to comment pursuant to authority under section 4(a) of
the Administrative Procedure Act (APA) (5 U.S.C. 553(b)). This
provision authorizes an agency to issue a rule without prior notice and
opportunity to comment when the agency for good cause finds that those
procedures are ``impracticable, unnecessary, or contrary to the public
interest.'' Under 5 U.S.C. 553(b)(B), the Coast Guard finds that good
cause exists for not publishing a notice of proposed rulemaking with
respect to this rule because it is impracticable. The Coast Guard did
not receive details for the vessel's arrival and transit until December
20, 2020. The Coast Guard must establish this safety zone by December
24, 2020 and lacks sufficient time to provide a reasonable comment
period and consider those comments before issuing the rule.
    Under 5 U.S.C. 553(d)(3), the Coast Guard finds that good cause
exists for making this rule effective less than 30 days after
publication in the Federal Register. It is contrary to the public
interest to delay the effective date of this rule because the safety
zone must be effective by December 24, 2020 to protect vessels and
persons from the dangers associated with the M/V ZHEN HUA 35 as it
transits a busy waterway between December 24, 2020 and January 10,
2021.

III. Legal Authority and Need for Rule

    The Coast Guard is issuing this rule under authority 46 U.S.C.
70034 (previously 33 U.S.C. 1231). The Captain of the Port San
Francisco has determined that potential hazards associated with the
transit of the M/V ZHEN HUA 35 between December 24, 2020 and January
10, 2021, will be a safety concern for anyone within a 500-foot radius
of the vessel during its transit to Oakland, Berth 58, while the vessel
is within the San Francisco Bay and areas shoreward of the line drawn
between San Francisco Main Ship Channel Lighted Bell Buoy 7 and San
Francisco Main Ship Channel Lighted Whistle Buoy 8 (LLNR 4190 & 4195)
in positions 37[deg]46.9' N, 122[deg]35.4' W and 37[deg]46.5' N,
122[deg]35.2' W, respectively. For this reason, a safety zone is needed
to protect personnel, vessels, and the marine environment in the
navigable waters around the M/V ZHEN HUA 35 during its transit to Berth
58 at the Oakland International Container Terminal in Oakland, CA.

IV. Discussion of the Rule

    This rule establishes a safety zone from 12:01 a.m. on December 24,
2020 until 11:59 p.m. on January 10, 2021, during the inbound transit
of the M/V ZHEN HUA 35. While the M/V ZHEN HUA 35 is within the San
Francisco Bay and areas shoreward of the line drawn between San
Francisco Main Ship Channel Lighted Bell Buoy 7 and San Francisco Main
Ship Channel Lighted Whistle Buoy 8 (LLNR 4190 & 4195) in positions
37[deg]46.9' N, 122[deg]35.4' W and 37[deg]46.5' N, 122[deg]35.2' W,
respectively, the safety zone will encompass the navigable waters
around and under the vessel, from surface to bottom, within a circle
formed by connecting all points 500 feet out from the vessel. The
safety zone is needed to protect personnel, mariners, and vessels from
hazards associated with ship-to-shore gantry crane arms which will
extend more than 200 feet out from the transiting vessel. This loading
configuration is necessary in order for the vessel to pass safely under
the Golden Gate Bridge and the San Francisco-Oakland Bay Bridge.
    The M/V ZHEN HUA 35 will make a temporary stop in Anchorage 9
during its transit to the Oakland International Container Terminal. The
vessel will stop temporarily for the crew to make adjustments to the
cargo so the vessel can safely moor at Berth 58 in Oakland, CA. The
cargo adjustments will include raising three ship-to-shore crane arms
to an upright position which will facilitate mooring.
    The effect of the safety zone is to restrict navigation in the
vicinity of the M/V ZHEN HUA 35. Except for persons or vessels
authorized by the COTP or the COTP's designated representative, no
person or vessel may enter or remain in the restricted area.
``Designated representative'' means a Coast Guard Patrol Commander,
including a Coast Guard coxswain, petty officer, or other officer
operating a Coast Guard vessel or a Federal, State, or local officer
designated by or assisting the Captain of the Port San Francisco (COTP)
in the enforcement of the safety zone.

V. Regulatory Analyses

    We developed this rule after considering numerous statutes and
Executive orders related to rulemaking. Below we summarize our analyses
based on a number of these statutes and Executive orders, and we
discuss First Amendment rights of protestors.

A. Regulatory Planning and Review

    Executive Orders 12866 and 13563 direct agencies to assess the
costs and benefits of available regulatory alternatives and, if
regulation is necessary, to select regulatory approaches that maximize
net benefits. Executive Order 13771 directs agencies to control
regulatory costs through a budgeting process. This rule has not been
designated a ``significant regulatory action,'' under Executive Order
12866. Accordingly, this rule has not been reviewed by the Office of
Management and Budget (OMB), and pursuant to OMB guidance it is exempt
from the requirements of Executive Order 13771.
    This regulatory action determination is based on the limited
duration and

narrowly tailored geographic area of the safety zone. This safety zone
impacts a 500-foot-radius area of the San Francisco Bay in San
Francisco, CA for a limited duration. While the safety zone encompasses
a two week period to account for uncertain transit delays of the M/V
ZHEN HUA 35, the safety zone will only be enforced for the duration of
the vessel's inbound transit, which is expected to last less than 24
hours, and that period will be announced via Broadcast Notice to
Mariners. Vessels desiring to transit through the safety zone may do so
upon express permission from the COTP or the COTP's designated
representative.

B. Impact on Small Entities

    The Regulatory Flexibility Act of 1980, 5 U.S.C. 601-612, as
amended, requires Federal agencies to consider the potential impact of
regulations on small entities during rulemaking. The term ``small
entities'' comprises small businesses, not-for-profit organizations
that are independently owned and operated and are not dominant in their
fields, and governmental jurisdictions with populations of less than
50,000. The Coast Guard certifies under 5 U.S.C. 605(b) that this rule
will not have a significant economic impact on a substantial number of
small entities.
    While some owners or operators of vessels intending to transit the
temporary safety zone may be small entities, for the reasons stated in
section V.A. above, this rule will not have a significant economic
impact on any vessel owner or operator.
    Under section 213(a) of the Small Business Regulatory Enforcement
Fairness Act of 1996 (Public Law 104-121), we want to assist small
entities in understanding this rule. If the rule would affect your
small business, organization, or governmental jurisdiction and you have
questions concerning its provisions or options for compliance, please
contact the person listed in the FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT
section.
    Small businesses may send comments on the actions of Federal
employees who enforce, or otherwise determine compliance with, Federal
regulations to the Small Business and Agriculture Regulatory
Enforcement Ombudsman and the Regional Small Business Regulatory
Fairness Boards. The Ombudsman evaluates these actions annually and
rates each agency's responsiveness to small business. If you wish to
comment on actions by employees of the Coast Guard, call 1-888-REG-FAIR
(1-888-734-3247). The Coast Guard will not retaliate against small
entities that question or complain about this rule or any policy or
action of the Coast Guard.

C. Collection of Information

    This rule will not call for a new collection of information under
the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 (44 U.S.C. 3501-3520).

D. Federalism and Indian Tribal Governments

    A rule has implications for federalism under Executive Order 13132,
Federalism, if it has a substantial direct effect on the States, on the
relationship between the national government and the States, or on the
distribution of power and responsibilities among the various levels of
government. We have analyzed this rule under that Order and have
determined that it is consistent with the fundamental federalism
principles and preemption requirements described in Executive Order
13132.
    Also, this rule does not have tribal implications under Executive
Order 13175, Consultation and Coordination with Indian Tribal
Governments, because it does not have a substantial direct effect on
one or more Indian tribes, on the relationship between the Federal
Government and Indian tribes, or on the distribution of power and
responsibilities between the Federal Government and Indian tribes. If
you believe this rule has implications for federalism or Indian tribes,
please contact the person listed in the FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT
section above.

E. Unfunded Mandates Reform Act

    The Unfunded Mandates Reform Act of 1995 (2 U.S.C. 1531-1538)
requires Federal agencies to assess the effects of their discretionary
regulatory actions. In particular, the Act addresses actions that may
result in the expenditure by a State, local, or tribal government, in
the aggregate, or by the private sector of $100,000,000 (adjusted for
inflation) or more in any one year. Though this rule will not result in
such an expenditure, we do discuss the effects of this rule elsewhere
in this preamble.

F. Environment

    We have analyzed this rule under Department of Homeland Security
Directive 023-01 and U.S. Coast Guard Environmental Planning Policy,
COMDTINST 5090.1 (series), which guide the Coast Guard in complying
with the National Environmental Policy Act of 1969 (42 U.S.C. 4321-
4370f), and have determined that this action is one of a category of
actions that do not individually or cumulatively have a significant
effect on the human environment. This rule involves a safety zone which
prevents entry to a 500-foot radius area of the San Francisco Bay for a
limited period of time during a vessel's inbound transit. It is
categorically excluded from further review under paragraph L60(a) in
Table 3-1 of Department of Homeland Security Directive 023-01. A Record
of Environmental Consideration supporting this determination is
available in the docket where indicated under ADDRESSES.

G. Protest Activities

    The Coast Guard respects the First Amendment rights of protesters.
Protesters are asked to contact the person listed in the FOR FURTHER
INFORMATION CONTACT section to coordinate protest activities so that
your message can be received without jeopardizing the safety or
security of people, places or vessels.

List of Subjects in 33 CFR Part 165

    Harbors, Marine safety, Navigation (water), Reporting and
recordkeeping requirements, Security measures, Waterways.

    For the reasons discussed in the preamble, the Coast Guard amends
33 CFR part 165 as follows:

PART 165--REGULATED NAVIGATION AREAS AND LIMITED ACCESS AREAS

0
1. The authority citation for part 165 continues to read as follows:

    Authority:  46 U.S.C 70034, 70051; 33 CFR 1.05-1, 6.04-1, 6.04-
6, and 160.5; Department of Homeland Security Delegation No. 0170.1.

0
2. Add Sec.  165.T11-035 to read as follows:

Sec.  165.T11-045   Safety Zone; Oakland Ship-to-Shore Crane Arrival,
San Francisco Bay, Oakland, CA.

    (a) Location. The following area is a safety zone: all navigable
waters of the San Francisco Bay, from surface to bottom, within a
circle formed by connecting all points 500 feet out from the vessel, M/
V ZHEN HUA 35, during the vessel's inbound transit from a line drawn
between San Francisco Main Ship Channel Lighted Bell Buoy 7 and San
Francisco Main Ship Channel Lighted Whistle Buoy 8 (LLNR 4190 & 4195)
in positions 37[deg]46.9' N, 122[deg]35.4' W (NAD 83) and 37[deg]46.5'
N, 122[deg]35.2' W (NAD 83), respectively, to Berth 58 at the Oakland
International Container Terminal in Oakland, CA. This transit includes
a stop at Anchorage 9 to reposition the vessel's cargo.
    (b) Definitions. As used in this section, ``designated
representative''

means a Coast Guard Patrol Commander, including a Coast Guard coxswain,
petty officer, or other officer operating a Coast Guard vessel or a
Federal, State, or local officer designated by or assisting the Captain
of the Port San Francisco (COTP) in the enforcement of the safety zone.
    (c) Regulations. (1) Under the general safety zone regulations in
subpart C of this part, you may not enter the safety zone described in
paragraph (a) of this section unless authorized by the COTP or the
COTP's designated representative.
    (2) The safety zone is closed to all vessel traffic, except as may
be permitted by the COTP or the COTP's designated representative.
    (3) Vessel operators desiring to enter or operate within the safety
zone must contact the COTP or the COTP's designated representative to
obtain permission to do so. Vessel operators given permission to enter
or operate in the safety zone must comply with all lawful orders or
directions given to them by the COTP or the COTP's designated
representative. Persons and vessels may request permission to enter the
safety zone on VHF-23A or through the 24-hour Command Center at
telephone<PHONE_NUMBER>.
    (d) Enforcement period. This section will be enforced between 12:01
a.m. on December 24, 2020 until 11:59 p.m. on January 10, 2021 during
the inbound transit of the M/V ZHEN HUA 35, or as announced via
Broadcast Notice to Mariners.
    (e) Information broadcasts. The COTP or the COTP's designated
representative will notify the maritime community of periods during
which this zone will be enforced, in accordance with 33 CFR 165.7.

    Dated: December 22, 2020.
Marie B. Byrd,
Captain, U.S. Coast Guard, Captain of the Port, San Francisco.
[FR Doc. 2020-28874 Filed 12-28-20; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 9110-04-P


[Federal Register: April 20, 2007 (Volume 72, Number 76)]
[Notices]
[Page 19920-19921]
[DOCID:fr20ap07-59]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission

[Docket No. CP07-32-000]

Gulf South Pipeline Company, LP; Notice of Availability of the
Draft Environmental Impact Statement for the Proposed Southeast
Expansion Project

April 13, 2007.
    The staff of the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission (FERC or
Commission) has prepared a Draft Environmental Impact Statement (EIS)
on the natural gas pipeline facilities proposed by Gulf South Pipeline
Company, LP (Gulf South) in the above-referenced docket.
    The Draft EIS was prepared to satisfy the requirements of the
National Environmental Policy Act. The FERC staff concludes that the
proposed

Project, with the appropriate mitigation measures as recommended, would
have limited adverse environmental impact.
    The U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service (FWS), National Park Service
(NPS), U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA), and the U.S. Army
Corps of Engineers (COE) are federal cooperating agencies for the
development of this EIS. A federal cooperating agency has jurisdiction
by law or special expertise with respect to any environmental impact
involved with the proposal and is involved in the NEPA analysis.
    The purpose of the proposed Project is to transport up to 1.7
billion cubic feet per day of natural gas from production fields in
eastern Texas to markets in the Gulf coast, Midwestern, Northeastern
and Southeastern regions of the United States.
    The Draft EIS addresses the potential environmental impacts
resulting from the construction and operation of the following
facilities:
     Approximately 111 miles of 42-inch-diameter natural gas
transmission pipeline extending easterly from Simpson County,
Mississippi to Choctaw County, Alabama;
     Three new compressor stations, the Delhi, Harrisville, and
Destin Compressor Stations, located in Richland County, Louisiana;
Simpson County, Mississippi; and Choctaw County Alabama, respectively;
and
     other ancillary facilities including five meter and
regulator (M/R) facilities, eight mainline valves, 1 side valves, and
two pig launcher and/or receiver facilities.

Comment Procedures and Public Meetings

    Any person wishing to comment on the Draft EIS may do so. To ensure
that your comments are timely and properly recorded so that they may be
considered in the Final EIS, please carefully follow these
instructions:
     Send an original and two copies of your letter to:
Kimberly D. Bose, Secretary, Federal Energy Regulatory Commission, 888
First St., NE., Room 1A, Washington, DC 20426.
     Label one copy of your comments to the attention of Gas
Branch 2, DG2E; and Reference Docket No. CP07-032-000 on the original
and both copies
     Mail your comments so that they will be received in
Washington, DC on or before May 29, 2007.
    Please note that the Commission strongly encourages the electronic
filing (eFiling) of comments. Instructions on how to ``eFile'' comments
can be found on the Commission's Web site at http://www.ferc.gov under

the ``Documents and Filings'' link.
    In lieu of or in addition to sending written comments, we invite
you to attend the public comment meetings the FERC will conduct in the
project area to receive comments on the Draft EIS. All meetings will
begin at 7 p.m. (CST), and are scheduled as follows:

------------------------------------------------------------------------
            Date and time                           Location
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Tuesday, May 8, 7 p.m................  Mendenhall Civic Center, 1630-A
                                        Simpson Highway 149, Mendenhall,
                                        Mississippi 39114,<PHONE_NUMBER>.
Tuesday, May 9, 7 p.m................  Heidelberg Multi Purpose Bldg,
                                        114 West Park Street,
                                        Heidelberg, Mississippi 39439,
<PHONE_NUMBER>.
Wednesday, May 10, 7 p.m.............  Butler Civic Center, 114 North
                                        Academy Avenue, Butler, Alabama
                                        36904,<PHONE_NUMBER>.
------------------------------------------------------------------------

    The public comment meetings will be posted on the FERC's calendar
located at http://www.ferc.gov/EventCalendar/EventsList.aspx.

Interested groups and individuals are encouraged to attend and present
oral comments on the Draft EIS. Transcripts of the meetings will be
prepared.
    After the comments received are reviewed, any significant new
issues are investigated, and modifications are made to the Draft EIS, a
Final EIS will be published and distributed by the FERC staff. The
Final EIS will contain the staff's responses to timely comments
received on the Draft EIS.
    Comments will be considered by the Commission but will not serve to
make the commentor a party to the proceeding. Any person seeking to
become a party to the proceeding must file a motion to intervene
pursuant to Rule 214 of the Commission's Rules of Practice and
Procedures (18 CFR 385.214). Anyone may intervene in this proceeding
based on this Draft EIS. You must file your request to intervene as
specified above.\1\ You do not need intervenor status to have your
comments considered.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \1\ Interventions may also be filed electronically via the
Internet in lieu of paper. See the previous discussion on filing
comments electronically.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    The Draft EIS has been placed in the public files of the FERC and
is available for public inspection at: Federal Energy Regulatory
Commission, Public Reference Room, 888 First Street NE., Room 2A,
Washington, DC 20426,<PHONE_NUMBER>.
    A limited number of copies of the Draft EIS are available from the
Public Reference Room identified above. In addition, CD copies of the
Draft EIS have been mailed to affected landowners; various federal,
state, and local government agencies; elected officials; environmental
and public interest groups; Native American tribes; local libraries and
newspapers; intervenors; and other individuals that expressed an
interest in the proposed Project. Hard-copies of the Draft EIS have
also been mailed to those who requested that format during the scoping
and comment periods for the proposed Project.
    Additional information about the proposed Project is available from
the Commission's Office of External Affairs, at 1-866-208-FERC or on
the FERC Internet Web site (http://www.ferc.gov).

    To access information via the FERC Web site click on the
``eLibrary'' link then click on ``General Search'' and enter the docket
number excluding the last three digits in the Docket Number field. Be
sure you have selected an appropriate date range. The ``eLibrary'' link
provides access to the texts of formal documents issued by the
Commission, such as orders, notices, and rulemakings. For assistance
with ``eLibrary'', please contact FERC Online Support at
<EMAIL_ADDRESS>or toll free at 1-866-208-3676, or for TTY,

contact<PHONE_NUMBER>.
    In addition, the Commission now offers a free service called
eSubscription which allows you to keep track of all formal issuances
and submittals in specific dockets. This can reduce the amount of time
you spend researching proceedings by automatically providing you with
notification of these filings, document summaries and direct links to
these documents. To learn more about eSubscription and to sign-up for
this service please go to http://www.ferc.gov/esubscribenow.htm.

Kimberly D. Bose,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. E7-7565 Filed 4-19-07; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 6717-01-P


[Federal Register Volume 77, Number 76 (Thursday, April 19, 2012)]
[Notices]
[Pages 23473-23474]
[FR Doc No: 2012-9383]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission

Combined Notice of Filings 1

    Take notice that the Commission received the following electric
rate filings:

    Docket Numbers: ER10-1519-001.
    Applicants: Liberty Electric Power, LLC.
    Description: Supplement to Market Power Analysis of Liberty
Electric Power, LLC.
    Filed Date: 4/10/12.
    Accession Number: 20120410-5094.
    Comments Due: 5 p.m. ET 5/1/12.

    Docket Numbers: ER10-3196-001; ER10-2273-002.
    Applicants: PEI Power II, LLC, PEI Power Corporation.
    Description: Notice of Change in Status of PEI Power Corporation,
et al.
    Filed Date: 4/10/12.
    Accession Number: 20120410-5038.
    Comments Due: 5 p.m. ET 5/1/12.

    Docket Numbers: ER11-3035-001.
    Applicants: Midland Cogeneration Venture Limited Partnership.
    Description: Compliance Filing of Rate Schedule 1 for Reactive
Supply Service to be effective 6/1/2011.
    Filed Date: 4/10/12.
    Accession Number: 20120410-5099.
    Comments Due: 5 p.m. ET 5/1/12.

    Docket Numbers: ER12-30-001; ER11-47-001; ER11-46-004; ER10-2975-
004; ER10-2981-001; ER11-41-001.
    Applicants: BlueStar Energy Services Inc., AEP Operating Companies,
AEP Energy Partners, Inc., CSW Energy Services, Inc., CSW Operating
Companies, AEP Retail Energy Partners LLC.
    Description: Notice of Change in Status of American Electric Power
Service Corporation et al.
    Filed Date: 4/5/12.
    Accession Number: 20120405-5195.
    Comments Due: 5 p.m. ET 4/26/12.

    Docket Numbers: ER12-1462-000.
    Applicants: Southern California Edison Company.
    Description: SGIA SCE-RE Rosamond One LLC Rosamond One Project to
be effective 4/11/2012.
    Filed Date: 4/10/12.
    Accession Number: 20120410-5002.
    Comments Due: 5 p.m. ET 5/1/12.

    Docket Numbers: ER12-1463-000.
    Applicants: Optim Energy Marketing, LLC.
    Description: Optim Energy Notice of Cancellation--CBR to be
effective 4/10/2012.
    Filed Date: 4/10/12.
    Accession Number: 20120410-5045.
    Comments Due: 5 p.m. ET 5/1/12.

    Docket Numbers: ER12-1464-000.
    Applicants: Optim Energy Marketing, LLC.
    Description: Optim Energy Notice of Cancellation--MBR to be
effective 4/10/2012.
    Filed Date: 4/10/12.
    Accession Number: 20120410-5048.
    Comments Due: 5 p.m. ET 5/1/12.

    Docket Numbers: ER12-1465-000.
    Applicants: ISO New England Inc.
    Description: Conforming Tariff Record Filing to be effective 4/1/
2012.
    Filed Date: 4/10/12.
    Accession Number: 20120410-5049.
    Comments Due: 5 p.m. ET 5/1/12.

    Docket Numbers: ER12-1466-000.
    Applicants: Midwest Independent Transmission System Operator, Inc.
    Description: R38 Amended LGIA (04-10-12) to be effective 4/11/2012.
    Filed Date: 4/10/12.
    Accession Number: 20120410-5055.
    Comments Due: 5 p.m. ET 5/1/12.

    Docket Numbers: ER12-1467-000.
    Applicants: Midwest Independent Transmission System Operator, Inc.
    Description: R41 LGIA to be effective 4/11/2012.
    Filed Date: 4/10/12.
    Accession Number: 20120410-5086.
    Comments Due: 5 p.m. ET 5/1/12.

    Take notice that the Commission received the following open access
transmission tariff filings:

    Docket Numbers: OA07-32-013.
    Applicants: Entergy Services, Inc.
    Description: Informational Report of Entergy Services, Inc. re:
Penalty assessments and distributions.
    Filed Date: 4/9/12.
    Accession Number: 20120409-5167.
    Comments Due: 5 p.m. ET 4/30/12.

    The filings are accessible in the Commission's eLibrary system by
clicking on the links or querying the docket number.
    Any person desiring to intervene or protest in any of the above
proceedings must file in accordance with Rules 211 and 214 of the
Commission's Regulations (18 CFR 385.211 and 385.214) on or before 5
p.m. Eastern time on the specified comment date. Protests may be
considered, but intervention is necessary to become a party to the
proceeding.
    eFiling is encouraged. More detailed information relating to filing
requirements, interventions, protests, service, and qualifying
facilities filings can be found at: http://www.ferc.gov/docs-filing/efiling/filing-req.pdf. For other information, call<PHONE_NUMBER>
(toll free). For TTY, call<PHONE_NUMBER>.

    Dated: April 10, 2012.
Nathaniel J. Davis, Sr.,
Deputy Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2012-9383 Filed 4-18-12; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6717-01-P


[Federal Register Volume 82, Number 92 (Monday, May 15, 2017)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Pages 22280-22281]
[FR Doc No: 2017-09723]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY

Coast Guard

33 CFR Part 117

[Docket No. USCG-2017-0355]

Drawbridge Operation Regulation; Lake Washington Ship Canal,
Seattle, WA

AGENCY: Coast Guard, DHS.

ACTION: Notice of deviation from drawbridge regulation.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Coast Guard has issued a temporary deviation from the
operating schedule that governs the Montlake Bridge across Lake
Washington Ship Canal, mile 5.2, at Seattle, WA. The deviation is
necessary to accommodate the Emerald City Bike Ride event. This
deviation allows the bridge span to remain in the closed-to-navigation
position.

DATES: This deviation is effective from 6 a.m. to 9 a.m. on May 28,
2017.

ADDRESSES: The docket for this deviation, [USCG-2017-0355] is available
at http://www.regulations.gov. Type the docket number in the ``SEARCH''
box and click ``SEARCH.'' Click on Open Docket Folder on the line
associated with this deviation.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: If you have questions on this
temporary deviation, call or email Mr. Steven Fischer, Bridge
Administrator, Thirteenth Coast Guard District; telephone<PHONE_NUMBER>,
email<EMAIL_ADDRESS>
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The Washington Department of Transportation
(bridge owner) has requested a temporary deviation from the operating
schedule for the Montlake Bridge across Lake Washington Ship Canal, at
mile 5.2, at Seattle, WA. The deviation is necessary to accommodate
event participates to cross the bridge safely. The Montlake Bridge is a
double leaf bascule bridge; and in the closed-to-

navigation position provides 30 feet of vertical clearance throughout
the navigation channel, and 46 feet of vertical clearance throughout
the center 60 feet of the bridge; vertical clearance references to Mean
Water Level of Lake Washington. To facilitate this event, the double
bascule span will remain closed from 6 a.m. to 9 a.m. on May 28, 2017.
The Coast Guard coordinated with the local mariners by request any
objections via the Local Notice to Mariners.
    The normal operating schedule for the Montlake Bridge operates in
accordance with 33 CFR 117.1051(e). Waterway usage on the Lake
Washington Ship Canal ranges from commercial tug and barge to small
pleasure craft. Vessels able to pass through the bridge in the closed-
to-navigation position may do so at anytime. The bridge will be able to
open for emergencies and emergency vessels in route to a call. Lake
Washington Ship Canal has no immediate alternate route for vessels to
pass. The Coast Guard will also inform the users of the waterways
through our Local and Broadcast Notices to Mariners of the change in
operating schedule for the bridge so that vessels can arrange their
transits to minimize any impact caused by the temporary deviation.
    In accordance with 33 CFR 117.35(e), the drawbridge must return to
its regular operating schedule immediately at the end of the designated
time period. This deviation from the operating regulations is
authorized under 33 CFR 117.35.

    Dated: April 27, 2017.
Steven M. Fischer,
Bridge Administrator, Thirteenth Coast Guard District.
[FR Doc. 2017-09723 Filed 5-12-17; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 9110-04-P


[Federal Register: March 4, 2010 (Volume 75, Number 42)]
[Notices]
[Page 9887-9888]
[DOCID:fr04mr10-52]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission

Combined No.tice of Filings

February 17, 2010.
    Take notice that the Commission has received the following Natural
Gas Pipeline Rate and Refund Report filings:

    Docket Numbers: RP10-370-000.
    Applicants: Kinder Morgan Interstate Gas Trans. LLC.
    Description: Kinder Morgan Interstate Gas Transmission LLC submits
Original Sheet No. 4G.03 to FERC Gas Tariff, Fourth Revised Volume No.
1A, to be effective 3/1/10.
    Filed Date: 02/12/2010.
    Accession Number: 20100216-0201.
    Comment Date: 5 p.m. Eastern Time on Wednesday, February 24, 2010.

    Docket Numbers: RP10-371-000.
    Applicants: Kinder Morgan Interstate Gas Trans. LLC.
    Description: Kinder Morgan Interstate Gas Transmission LLC submits
Ninth Revised Sheet No. 4G.02 to FERC Gas Tariff, Fourth Revised Volume
No. 1A.
    Filed Date: 02/05/2010.
    Accession Number: 20100216-0202.
    Comment Date: 5 p.m. Eastern Time on Friday, February 19, 2010.

    Docket Numbers: RP10-372-000.
    Applicants: Rockies Express Pipeline LLC.
    Description: Rockies Express Pipeline LLC submits Eighth Revised
Sheet No. 8 et al. to FERC Gas Tariff, Second Revised Volume No. 1, to
be effective 2/13/10.
    Filed Date: 02/12/2010.
    Accession Number: 20100216-0203.
    Comment Date: 5 p.m. Eastern Time on Wednesday, February 24, 2010.

    Docket Numbers: RP10-373-000.
    Applicants: Rockies Express Pipeline LLC.
    Description: Rockies Express Pipeline LLC submits Seventh Revised
Sheet No. 8C et al. to FERC Gas Tariff, Second Revised Volume No. 1, to
be effective 2/12/10.
    Filed Date: 02/12/2010.
    Accession Number: 20100216-0204.
    Comment Date: 5 p.m. Eastern Time on Wednesday, February 24, 2010.

    Docket Numbers: RP10-374-000.
    Applicants: CenterPoint Energy Gas Transmission Co.
    Description: CenterPoint Energy Gas Transmission Co's requests for
a limited waiver of tariff provisions and expedited consideration.
    Filed Date: 02/12/2010.
    Accession Number: 20100216-0205.
    Comment Date: 5 p.m. Eastern Time on Friday, February 19, 2010.

    Docket Numbers: RP10-375-000.
    Applicants: Texas Eastern Transmission LP.
    Description: Texas Eastern Transmission, LP submits its FERC Gas
Tariff, Seventh Revised Volume 1 and First Revised Volume 2, to be
effective 3/14/10.
    Filed Date: 02/12/2010.
    Accession Number: 20100216-0206.
    Comment Date: 5 p.m. Eastern Time on Wednesday, February 24, 2010.

    Docket Numbers: RP10-376-000.
    Applicants: Columbia Gulf Transmission Company.
    Description: Columbia Gulf Transmission Company's Annual Report on
Operational Purchases and Sales.
    Filed Date: 02/16/2010.
    Accession Number: 20100216-5108.
    Comment Date: 5 p.m. Eastern Time on Monday, March 01, 2010.

    Docket Numbers: RP10-377-000.

    Applicants: Hardy Storage Company LLC.
    Description: Hardy Storage Company, LLC Annual Report on
Operational Transactions.
    Filed Date: 02/16/2010.
    Accession Number: 20100216-5109.
    Comment Date: 5 p.m. Eastern Time on Monday, March 01, 2010.

    Docket Numbers: RP10-380-000.
    Applicants: Kinder Morgan Interstate Gas Pipeline LLC.
    Description: Kinder Morgan Interstate Gas Pipeline LLC submits
Tenth Revised Sheet No. 4G.02 et al. to FERC Gas Tariff, Fourth Revised
Volume No. 1-A.
    Filed Date: 02/16/2010.
    Accession Number: 20100217-0220.
    Comment Date: 5 p.m. Eastern Time on Monday, March 01, 2010.

    Docket Numbers: RP10-381-000.
    Applicants: Columbia Gulf Transmission Company.
    Description: Columbia Gulf Transmission Company requests waiver of
the Annual Transportation Retainage Rate Adjustment (TRA) set forth in
section 33.2 of the General Terms and Conditions of its tariff which
requires Columbia Gulf to file its TRA by March 1, to be effective 4/1/
10.
    Filed Date: 02/16/2010.
    Comment Date: 5 p.m. Eastern Time on Friday, February 19, 2010.

    Docket Numbers: RP10-382-000.
    Applicants: Columbia Gas Transmission, LLC.
    Description: Columbia Gas Transmission Company, LLC requests waiver
of the Annual Retainage Adjustment Mechanism (RAM) set forth in Section
35.2 of the General Terms and Conditions of its tariff which requires
Columbia Gas to file its RAM by March 1, to be effective 4/1/10.
    Filed Date: 02/16/2010.
    Comment Date: 5 p.m. Eastern Time on Friday, February 19, 2010.

    Any person desiring to intervene or to protest in any of the above
proceedings must file in accordance with Rules 211 and 214 of the
Commission's Rules of Practice and Procedure (18 CFR 385.211 and
385.214) on or before 5 p.m. Eastern time on the specified comment
date. It is not necessary to separately intervene again in a subdocket
related to a compliance filing if you have previously intervened in the
same docket. Protests will be considered by the Commission in
determining the appropriate action to be taken, but will not serve to
make protestants parties to the proceeding. Anyone filing a motion to
intervene or protest must serve a copy of that document on the
Applicant. In reference to filings initiating a new proceeding,
interventions or protests submitted on or before the comment deadline
need not be served on persons other than the Applicant.
    The Commission encourages electronic submission of protests and
interventions in lieu of paper, using the FERC Online links at http://
www.ferc.gov. To facilitate electronic service, persons with Internet
access who will eFile a document and/or be listed as a contact for an
intervenor must create and validate an eRegistration account using the
eRegistration link. Select the eFiling link to log on and submit the
intervention or protests.
    Persons unable to file electronically should submit an original and
14 copies of the intervention or protest to the Federal Energy
Regulatory Commission, 888 First St., NE., Washington, DC 20426.
    The filings in the above proceedings are accessible in the
Commission's eLibrary system by clicking on the appropriate link in the
above list. They are also available for review in the Commission's
Public Reference Room in Washington, DC. There is an eSubscription link
on the Web site that enables subscribers to receive e-mail notification
when a document is added to a subscribed docket(s). For assistance with
any FERC Online service, please e-mail<EMAIL_ADDRESS>or
call<PHONE_NUMBER> (toll free). For TTY, call<PHONE_NUMBER>.

Nathaniel J. Davis, Sr.,
Deputy Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2010-4563 Filed 3-3-10; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE P


[Federal Register Volume 79, Number 115 (Monday, June 16, 2014)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Page 34217]
[FR Doc No: 2014-14049]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION

Federal Aviation Administration

14 CFR Part 71

[Docket No. FAA-2013-0986; Airspace Docket No. 13-AGL-25]

Establishment of Class E Airspace; Bois Blanc Island, MI

AGENCY: Federal Aviation Administration (FAA), DOT.

ACTION: Final rule, correction.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: This action corrects an error in the legal description of a
final rule published in the Federal Register of May 22, 2014, that
establishes Class E airspace at Bois Blanc Island Airport, Bois Blanc
Island, MI. The legal description noted incorrectly the airport's state
and geographic coordinates.

DATES: Effective date: 0901 UTC, July 24, 2014.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Raul Garza, Jr., Central Service
Center, Operations Support Group, Federal Aviation Administration,
Southwest Region, 2601 Meacham Blvd., Fort Worth, TX 76137; telephone:
817-321-7654.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

History

    On May 22, 2014, a final rule was published in the Federal Register
establishing Class E airspace at Bois Blanc Island Airport, Bois Blanc
Island, MI (79 FR 29323), Docket No. FAA-2013-0986. Subsequent to
publication, the FAA found the document showing the wrong state and
geographic location in the legal description. It should read Bois Blanc
Island Airport, MI, (lat. 45[deg]45'59'' N., long. 084[deg]30'14'' W.),
instead of Bois Blanc Island Airport, MO, (lat. 38[deg]20'52'' N.,
long. 93[deg]20'43'' W.) This action makes the correction.

Final Rule Correction

    Accordingly, pursuant to the authority delegated to me, in the
Federal Register of May 22, 2014, (79 FR 29323) FR Doc. 2014-11382, the
state and geographic coordinates in the airspace designation regulatory
text on page 29324, column 2, line 1, are corrected as follows:

Sec.  71.1  [Amended]

AGL MI E5 Bois Blanc Island, MI [Corrected]

0
Remove Bois Blanc Island Airport, MO, (lat. 38[deg]20'52'' N., long.
93[deg]20'43'' W.) and add in its place Bois Blanc Island Airport, MI,
(lat. 45[deg]45'59'' N., long. 084[deg]30'14'' W.)

    Issued in Fort Worth, Texas, on June 6, 2014.
Christopher L. Southerland,
Manager, Operations Support Group, ATO Central Service Center.
[FR Doc. 2014-14049 Filed 6-13-14; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910-13-P


PAPERWORK REDUCTION ACT SUBMISSION Please read the instructions before completing this form. For additional forms or assistance in completing this form, contact your agency's Paperwork Clearance Officer. Send two copies of this form, the collection instrument to be reviewed, the Supporting Statement and any additional documentation to: Office of Information and Regulatory Affairs, Office of Management and Budget, Docket Library, Room 10102, 725 17th Street NW Washington, DC 20503.

1. Agency/ Subagency originating request USEPA/ Office of Enforcement and Compliance Assurance 2. OMB control number b. G None a. 2060 0450 __ __ __ __

3. Type of information collection ( check one) a. G New collection b. G Revision of a currently approved collection c. X Extension of a currently approved collection d. G Reinstatement, without change, of a previously approved collection for which approval has expired e. G Reinstatement, with change, of a previously approved collection for which approval has expired f. G Existing collection in use without an OMB control number 4. Type of review requested ( check one) a. X Regular b. G Emergency  Approval requested by: / / c. G Delegated 5. Small entities Will this information collection have a significant economic impact on a substantial number of small entities? G Yes X No For b f, note item A2 of Supporting Statement Instructions 6. Requested expiration date a. X Three years from approval date b. G Other Specify: / /___

7. Title NSPS for Commercial and Industrial Solid Waste Incineration Units ( 40 CFR part 60, subpart CCCC)

8. Agency form number( s) ( If applicable) EPA ICR Number 1926.03 9. Keywords Incineration unit, solid waste, CISWI 10. Abstract This standard applies to owners and operators of commercial and industrial solid waste incineration units ( CISWI). All respondents must conduct initial and annual stack tests, establish and continuously monitor operating parameters, prepare a waste management plan, prepare a siting analysis, and conduct operator training and qualification. Reports must be submitted and records kept on site to document and support the above activities. In addition to the monitoring, recordkeeping and reporting requirements listed in the General Provisions ( 40 CFR part 60), commercial and industrial solid waste incineration units are required to meet the specific requirements at 40 CFR part 60, subpart CCCC, to determine if compliance has been achieved and maintained.

11. Affected public ( Mark primary with " P" and all others that apply with " X") a. Individuals or households d. Farms b. P Business or other for profit e. X Federal Government c. Not for profit institutions f. X State, Local or Tribal Government 12. Obligation to respond ( Mark primary with " P" and all others that apply with " X") a. G Voluntary b. G Required to obtain or retain benefits c. P Mandatory 13. Annual reporting and recordkeeping hour burden a. Number of respondents 30 b. Total annual responses 52 1. Percentage of these responses collected electronically 10 ______ % c. Total hours requested 16,899 d. Current OMB inventory 11,209 e. Difference 5,690 f. Explanation of difference 1. Program Change 2. Adjustment 5,690 14. Annual reporting and recordkeeping cost burden ( in thousands of dollars) a. Total annualized capital/ startup costs 13 b. Total annual costs ( O& M) 5 c. Total annualized cost requested 18 d. Current OMB inventory 14 e. Difference 4 f. Explanation of difference 1. Program change 2. Adjustment 4 15. Purpose of information collection ( Mark Primary With " P" and all others that apply with " X") a. Application for benefits e. Program planning or management b. Program evaluation f. Research c. General purpose statistics g. P Regulatory or compliance d. __ Audit 16. Frequency of recordkeeping or reporting ( check all that apply) a. X Recordkeeping b. Q Third party disclosure c. X Reporting 1. Q On occasion 2. Q Weekly 3. Q Monthly 4. Q Quarterly 5. X Semi annually 6. X Annually 7. Q Biannually 8. X Other ( describe) Initial 17. Statistical methods Does this information collection employ statistical methods?

Q Yes X No 18. Agency contact ( person who can best answer questions regarding the content of this submission) Name: Learia A. Williams Phone: ( 202) 564 4113 OMB 83 I 10/ 95 19. Certification for Paperwork Reduction Act Submissions On behalf of this Federal agency, I certify that the collection of information encompassed by this request complies with' 5 CFR 1320.9.

NOTE: The text of 5 CFR 1320.9, and the related provisions of 5 CFR 1320.8( b)( 3), appear at the end of the instructions. The certification is to be made with reference to those regulatory provisions as set forth in the instructions.

The following is a summary of the topics, regarding the proposed collection of information, that the certification covers:

( a) It is necessary for the proper performance of agency functions;

( b) It avoids unnecessary duplication;

( c) It reduces burden on small entities;

( d) It uses plain, coherent, and unambiguous terminology that is understandable to respondents;

( e) Its implementation will be consistent and compatible with current reporting and recordkeeping practices;

( f) It indicates the retention periods for recordkeeping requirements;

( g) It informs respondents of the information called for under 5 CFR 1320.8( b)( 3):

( i) Why the information is being collected; ( ii) Use of information; ( iii) Burden estimate; ( iv) Nature of response ( voluntary, required for a benefit, or mandatory); ( v) Nature and extent of confidentiality; and ( vi) Need to display currently valid OMB control number;

( h) It was developed by an office that has planned and allocated resources for the efficient and effective management and use of the information to be collected ( see note in Item 19 of the instructions);

( i) It uses effective and efficient statistical survey methodology; and ( j) It makes appropriate use of information technology.

If you are unable to certify compliance with any of these provisions, identify the item below and explain the reason in Item 18 of the Supporting Statement.

Signature of Program Official Michael S. Alushin, Director Compliance Assessment and Media Programs Division Office of Compliance Office of Enforcement and Compliance Assurance Date Signature of Senior Official or designee Doreen Sterling, Acting Director Collection Strategies Division Office of Environmental Information Date OMB 83 I 10/ 95


[Federal Register: April 14, 2008 (Volume 73, Number 72)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Page 19979-19982]
[DOCID:fr14ap08-10]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION

Federal Aviation Administration

14 CFR Part 39

[Docket No. FAA-2008-0047; Directorate Identifier 2007-NM-295-AD;
Amendment 39-15461; AD 2008-08-09]
RIN 2120-AA64

Airworthiness Directives; Bombardier Model CL-600-2B19 (Regional
Jet Series 100 & 440) Airplanes

AGENCY: Federal Aviation Administration (FAA), Department of
Transportation (DOT).

ACTION: Final rule.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The FAA is superseding an existing airworthiness directive
(AD), which applies to certain Bombardier Model CL-600-2B19 (Regional
Jet Series 100 & 400) airplanes. That AD currently requires revising
the airworthiness limitations section of the Instructions for Continued
Airworthiness of the maintenance requirements manual (MRM) by
incorporating procedures for repetitive functional tests of the pilot
input lever of the pitch feel simulator (PFS) units. That AD also
requires new repetitive functional tests of the pilot input lever of
the PFS unit, and corrective actions if necessary; and after initiating
the new tests, requires removal of the existing procedures for the
repetitive functional

tests from the MRM. This new AD requires revised procedures for the
functional tests. This AD results from a report that the shear pin
located in the input lever of two PFS units failed due to fatigue. We
are issuing this AD to prevent undetected failure of the shear pins of
both PFS units simultaneously, which could result in loss of pitch feel
forces and consequent reduced control of the airplane.

DATES: This AD becomes effective May 19, 2008.
    The Director of the Federal Register approved the incorporation by
reference of a certain publication listed in the AD as of May 19, 2008.
    On March 27, 2006 (71 FR 12277, March 10, 2006), the Director of
the Federal Register approved the incorporation by reference of
Bombardier Alert Service Bulletin A601R-27-144, Revision A, dated
February 14, 2006, including Appendix A, dated September 15, 2005.
    On February 13, 2004 (69 FR 4234, January 29, 2004), the Director
of the Federal Register approved the incorporation by reference of
Bombardier Temporary Revision 2B-1784, dated October 24, 2003, to the
CL-600-2B19 Canadair Regional Jet Maintenance Requirements Manual, Part
2, Appendix B, ``Airworthiness Limitations.''

ADDRESSES: For service information identified in this AD, contact
Bombardier, Inc., Canadair, Aerospace Group, P.O. Box 6087, Station
Centre-ville, Montreal, Quebec H3C 3G9, Canada.

Examining the AD Docket

    You may examine the AD docket on the Internet at http://
www.regulations.gov; or in person at the Docket Management Facility
between 9 a.m. and 5 p.m., Monday through Friday, except Federal
holidays. The AD docket contains this AD, the regulatory evaluation,
any comments received, and other information. The address for the
Docket Office (telephone<PHONE_NUMBER>) is the Document Management
Facility, U.S. Department of Transportation, Docket Operations, M-30,
West Building Ground Floor, Room W12-140, 1200 New Jersey Avenue, SE.,
Washington, DC 20590.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Dan Parrillo, Aerospace Engineer,
Systems and Flight Test Branch, ANE-172, New York Aircraft
Certification Office, FAA, 1600 Stewart Avenue, Suite 410, Westbury,
New York 11590; telephone<PHONE_NUMBER>; fax<PHONE_NUMBER>.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

Discussion

    The FAA issued a notice of proposed rulemaking (NPRM) to amend 14
CFR part 39 to include an AD that supersedes AD 2006-05-11 R1,
amendment 39-14528 (71 FR 15323, March 28, 2006). The existing AD
applies to certain Bombardier Model CL-600-2B19 (Regional Jet Series
100 & 400) airplanes. That NPRM was published in the Federal Register
on January 24, 2008 (73 FR 4125). That NPRM proposed to continue to
require revising the airworthiness limitations section of the
Instructions for Continued Airworthiness of the maintenance
requirements manual (MRM) by incorporating procedures for repetitive
functional tests of the pilot input lever of the pitch feel simulator
(PFS) units. That NPRM also proposed to continue to require new
repetitive functional tests of the pilot input lever of the PFS unit,
and corrective actions if necessary; and after initiating the new
tests, requires removal of the existing procedures for the repetitive
functional tests from the MRM. That NPRM also proposed to require
revised procedures for the functional tests.

Comments

    We provided the public the opportunity to participate in the
development of this AD. No comments have been received on the NPRM or
on the determination of the cost to the public.

Conclusion

    We have carefully reviewed the available data and determined that
air safety and the public interest require adopting the AD as proposed.

Costs of Compliance

    The following table provides the estimated costs for U.S. operators
to comply with this AD.

                                                 Estimated Costs
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
                                                                                Number of U.S.-
            Action               Work hours     Average labor      Cost per        registered       Fleet cost
                                                rate per hour      airplane         airplanes
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Revise MRM...................               1             $80  $80.............             684  $54,720.
Functional tests.............               1              80  $80, per test                684  $54,720, per
                                                                cycle.                            test cycle.
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Authority for This Rulemaking

    Title 49 of the United States Code specifies the FAA's authority to
issue rules on aviation safety. Subtitle I, Section 106, describes the
authority of the FAA Administrator. Subtitle VII, Aviation Programs,
describes in more detail the scope of the Agency's authority.
    We are issuing this rulemaking under the authority described in
Subtitle VII, Part A, Subpart III, Section 44701, ``General
requirements.'' Under that section, Congress charges the FAA with
promoting safe flight of civil aircraft in air commerce by prescribing
regulations for practices, methods, and procedures the Administrator
finds necessary for safety in air commerce. This regulation is within
the scope of that authority because it addresses an unsafe condition
that is likely to exist or develop on products identified in this
rulemaking action.

Regulatory Findings

    We have determined that this AD will not have federalism
implications under Executive Order 13132. This AD will not have a
substantial direct effect on the States, on the relationship between
the national government and the States, or on the distribution of power
and responsibilities among the various levels of government.
    For the reasons discussed above, I certify that this AD:
    (1) Is not a ``significant regulatory action'' under Executive
Order 12866;
    (2) Is not a ``significant rule'' under DOT Regulatory Policies and
Procedures (44 FR 11034, February 26, 1979); and
    (3) Will not have a significant economic impact, positive or
negative, on a substantial number of small entities under the criteria
of the Regulatory Flexibility Act.
    We prepared a regulatory evaluation of the estimated costs to
comply with this AD and placed it in the AD docket. See the ADDRESSES
section for a location to examine the regulatory evaluation.

List of Subjects in 14 CFR Part 39

    Air transportation, Aircraft, Aviation safety, Incorporation by
reference, Safety.

Adoption of the Amendment

0
Accordingly, under the authority delegated to me by the Administrator,
the FAA amends 14 CFR part 39 as follows:

PART 39--AIRWORTHINESS DIRECTIVES

0
1. The authority citation for part 39 continues to read as follows:

    Authority: 49 U.S.C. 106(g), 40113, 44701.

Sec.  39.13  [Amended]

0
2. The Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) amends Sec.  39.13 by
removing amendment 39-14528 (71 FR 15323, March 28, 2006) and by adding
the following new airworthiness directive (AD):

2008-08-09 Bombardier, Inc. (Formerly Canadair): Amendment 39-15461.
Docket No. FAA-2008-0047; Directorate Identifier 2007-NM-295-AD.

Effective Date

    (a) This AD becomes effective May 19, 2008.

Affected ADs

    (b) This AD supersedes AD 2006-05-11 R1.

Applicability

    (c) This AD applies to Bombardier Model CL-600-2B19 (Regional
Jet Series 100 & 400) airplanes, certificated in any category,
serial numbers 7003 through 7990 inclusive, and 8000 and subsequent.

Unsafe Condition

    (d) This AD results from a report that the shear pin located in
the input lever of two pitch feel simulator (PFS) units failed due
to fatigue. We are issuing this AD to prevent undetected failure of
the shear pins of both PFS units simultaneously, which could result
in loss of pitch feel forces and consequent reduced control of the
airplane.

Compliance

    (e) You are responsible for having the actions required by this
AD performed within the compliance times specified, unless the
actions have already been done.

Restatement of Requirements of AD 2006-05-11 R1

Revise Airworthiness Limitations (AWL) Section of Maintenance
Requirements Manual

    (f) For airplanes having serial numbers 7003 through 7990
inclusive: Within 14 days after February 13, 2004 (the effective
date of AD 2004-02-07, which was superseded by AD 2006-05-11 R1),
revise the AWL section of the Instructions for Continued
Airworthiness of the maintenance requirements manual by
incorporating the functional check of the PFS pilot input lever,
Task R27-31-A024-01, as specified in Bombardier Temporary Revision
(TR) 2B-1784, dated October 24, 2003, to the CL-600-2B19 Canadair
Regional Jet Maintenance Requirements Manual, Part 2, Appendix B,
``Airworthiness Limitations,'' into the AWL section.

New Repetitive Functional Tests and Corrective Actions

    (g) Before the accumulation of 4,000 total flight hours, or
within 100 flight hours after March 27, 2006 (the effective date of
AD 2006-05-11 R1), whichever occurs later: Do a functional test of
the pilot input lever of the PFS units to determine if the lever is
disconnected, in accordance with the Accomplishment Instructions of
Bombardier Alert Service Bulletin A601R-27-144, Revision A, dated
February 14, 2006, including Appendix A, dated September 15, 2005,
except as required by paragraph (j) of this AD. Repeat the test at
intervals not to exceed 100 flight hours. Accomplishing the initial
functional test terminates the requirements of paragraph (f) of this
AD and the repetitive functional checks of the PFS pilot input
lever, Task R27-31-A024-01, as specified in the AWL section of the
Instructions for Continued Airworthiness of CL-600-2B19 Canadair
Regional Jet Maintenance Requirements Manual.
    (h) If any lever is found to be disconnected during any
functional test required by paragraph (g) of this AD, do the actions
specified in paragraphs (h)(1) and (h)(2) of this AD in accordance
with the Accomplishment Instructions of Bombardier Alert Service
Bulletin A601R-27-144, Revision A, dated February 14, 2006,
including Appendix A, dated September 15, 2005, except as required
by paragraph (j) of this AD.
    (1) Before further flight, replace the defective PFS with a
serviceable PFS in accordance with the Accomplishment Instructions
of the alert service bulletin; and
    (2) Within 30 days after removing the defective PFS, submit a
test report to the manufacturer in accordance with the
Accomplishment Instructions of the alert service bulletin. Under the
provisions of the Paperwork Reduction Act (44 U.S.C. 3501 et seq.),
the Office of Management and Budget (OMB) has approved the
information collection requirements contained in this AD and has
assigned OMB Control Number 2120-0056.

Previously Accomplished Actions

    (i) Actions done before March 27, 2006, in accordance with
Bombardier Alert Service Bulletin A601R-27-144, including Appendix
A, dated September 15, 2005, are acceptable for compliance with the
requirements of paragraph (g) of this AD.

New Requirements of This AD

New Service Bulletin for Functional Tests

    (j) As of the effective date of this AD, Bombardier Alert
Service Bulletin A601R-27-144, Revision B, dated December 20, 2006,
including Appendix A, Revision A, dated December 20, 2006, must be
used for the actions required by paragraphs (g) and (h) of this AD.

Alternative Methods of Compliance (AMOCs)

    (k)(1) The Manager, New York Aircraft Certification Office
(ACO), FAA, has the authority to approve AMOCs for this AD, if
requested in accordance with the procedures found in 14 CFR 39.19.
    (2) To request a different method of compliance or a different
compliance time for this AD, follow the procedures in 14 CFR 39.19.
Before using any approved AMOC on any airplane to which the AMOC
applies, notify your appropriate principal inspector (PI) in the FAA
Flight Standards District Office (FSDO), or lacking a PI, your local
FSDO.

Related Information

    (l) Canadian airworthiness directive CF-2005-41, dated December
22, 2005, also addresses the subject of this AD.

Material Incorporated by Reference

    (m) You must use the applicable service information listed in
Table 1 of this AD to perform the actions that are required by this
AD, unless the AD specifies otherwise.

                                  Table 1.--Material Incorporated by Reference
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
    Bombardier service information                 Revision level                            Date
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Alert Service Bulletin A601R-27-144,    A..................................  February 14, 2006.
 including Appendix A, dated September
 15, 2005.
Alert Service Bulletin A601R-27-144,    B..................................  December 20, 2006.
 including Appendix A, Revision A,
 dated December 20, 2006.
Temporary Revision 2B-1784 to the CL-   Original...........................  October 24, 2003.
 600-2B19 Canadair Regional Jet
 Maintenance Requirements Manual, Part
 2, Appendix B, ``Airworthiness
 Limitations.
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

    (1) The Director of the Federal Register approved the
incorporation by reference of Bombardier Alert Service Bulletin
A601R-27-144, Revision B, dated December 20, 2006, including
Appendix A, Revision A,

dated December 20, 2006, in accordance with 5 U.S.C. 552(a) and 1
CFR part 51.
    (2) On March 27, 2006 (71 FR 12277, March 10, 2006), the
Director of the Federal Register approved the incorporation by
reference of Bombardier Alert Service Bulletin A601R-27-144,
Revision A, dated February 14, 2006, including Appendix A, dated
September 15, 2005.
    (3) On February 13, 2004 (69 FR 4234, January 29, 2004), the
Director of the Federal Register approved the incorporation by
reference of Bombardier Temporary Revision 2B-1784, dated October
24, 2003, to the CL-600-2B19 Canadair Regional Jet Maintenance
Requirements Manual, Part 2, Appendix B, ``Airworthiness
Limitations.''
    (4) Contact Bombardier, Inc., Canadair, Aerospace Group, P.O.
Box 6087, Station Centre-ville, Montreal, Quebec H3C 3G9, Canada,
for a copy of this service information. You may review copies at the
FAA, Transport Airplane Directorate, 1601 Lind Avenue, SW., Renton,
Washington; or at the National Archives and Records Administration
(NARA). For information on the availability of this material at
NARA, call<PHONE_NUMBER>, or go to: http://www.archives.gov/federal-
register/cfr/ibr-locations.html.

    Issued in Renton, Washington, on March 31, 2008.
Dionne Palermo,
Acting Manager, Transport Airplane Directorate, Aircraft Certification
Service.
[FR Doc. E8-7294 Filed 4-11-08; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4910-13-P


[Federal Register Volume 77, Number 74 (Tuesday, April 17, 2012)]
[Notices]
[Page 22824]
[FR Doc No: 2012-9304]

=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

Sunshine Act Meeting

    Notice is hereby given, pursuant to the provisions of the
Government in the Sunshine Act, Public Law 94-409, that the Securities
and Exchange Commission will hold a Closed Meeting on Thursday, April
19, 2012 at 2 p.m.
    Commissioners, Counsel to the Commissioners, the Secretary to the
Commission, and recording secretaries will attend the Closed Meeting.
Certain staff members who have an interest in the matters also may be
present.
    The General Counsel of the Commission, or his designee, has
certified that, in his opinion, one or more of the exemptions set forth
in 5 U.S.C. 552b(c)(3), (5), (7), 9(B), and (10) and 17 CFR
200.402(a)(3), (5), (7), 9(ii), and (10), permit consideration of the
scheduled matters at the Closed Meeting.
    Commissioner Gallagher, as duty officer, voted to consider the
items listed for the Closed Meeting in a closed session, and determined
that no earlier notice thereof was possible.
    The subject matter of the Closed Meeting scheduled for Thursday,
April 19, 2012 will be:

    Institution and settlement of injunctive actions;
    Institution and settlement of administrative proceedings;
    Other matters relating to enforcement proceedings;
    A litigation matter; and
    An opinion.

    At times, changes in Commission priorities require alterations in
the scheduling of meeting items.
    For further information and to ascertain what, if any, matters have
been added, deleted, or postponed, please contact: The Office of the
Secretary at<PHONE_NUMBER>.

    Dated: April 13, 2012.
Kevin M. O'Neill,
Deputy Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2012-9304 Filed 4-13-12; 11:15 am]
BILLING CODE 8011-01-P


[Federal Register Volume 77, Number 114 (Wednesday, June 13, 2012)]
[Notices]
[Pages 35453-35455]
[FR Doc No: 2012-14341]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

[Release No. 34-67158; File No. SR-EDGX-2012-19]

Self-Regulatory Organizations; EDGX Exchange, Inc.; Notice of
Filing and Immediate Effectiveness of Proposed Rule Change Relating to
Amendments to the EDGX Exchange, Inc. Fee Schedule

June 7, 2012.
    Pursuant to Section 19(b)(1) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934
(the ``Act''),\1\ and Rule 19b-4 thereunder,\2\ notice is hereby given
that on May 31, 2012 the EDGX Exchange, Inc. (the ``Exchange'' or
``EDGX'') filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission
(``Commission'') the proposed rule change as described in Items I, II
and III below, which items have been prepared by the self-regulatory
organization. The Commission is publishing this notice to solicit
comments on the proposed rule change from interested persons.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \1\ 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(1).
    \2\ 17 CFR 240.19b-4.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

I. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement of the Terms of Substance
of the Proposed Rule Change

    The Exchange proposes to amend its fees and rebates applicable to
Members \3\ of the Exchange pursuant to EDGX Rule 15.1(a) and (c). All
of the changes described herein are applicable to EDGX Members. The
text of the proposed rule change is available on the Exchange's
Internet Web site at http://

www.directedge.com, at the Exchange's principal office, and at the
Public Reference Room of the Commission.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \3\ A Member is any registered broker or dealer, or any person
associated with a registered broker or dealer, that has been
admitted to membership in the Exchange.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

II. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement of the Purpose of, and
Statutory Basis for, the Proposed Rule Change

    In its filing with the Commission, the self-regulatory organization
included statements concerning the purpose of, and basis for, the
proposed rule change and discussed any comments it received on the
proposed rule change. The text of these statements may be examined at
the places specified in Item IV below. The self-regulatory organization
has prepared summaries, set forth in sections A, B and C below, of the
most significant aspects of such statements.

A. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement of the Purpose of, and the
Statutory Basis for, the Proposed Rule Change

Purpose
    The Exchange proposes to amend the percentage associated with the
``added liquidity'' to ``removed liquidity'' ratio in part (ii) of the
Investor Tier (Footnote 13) from 70% to 60% and pluralize ``Member.''
Therefore, Footnote 13, will read, ``Members can qualify for an
Investor Tier and be provided a rebate of $0.0030 per share if they
meet the following criteria: (i) On a daily basis, measured monthly,
posts an ADV of at least 8 million shares on EDGX where added flags are
defined as B, HA, V, Y, MM, 3, or 4; (ii) have an ``added liquidity''
to ``removed liquidity'' ratio of at least 60% where added flags are
defined as B, HA, V, Y, MM, 3, or 4 and removal flags are defined as
BB, MT, N, W, PI, or 6; and (iii) have a message-to-trade ratio of less
than 6:1.''
Codification of Late Fees
    Currently, the Exchange charges additional fees to Members that
fail to pay all dues, fees, assessments and charges owed to the
Exchange by the prescribed due date. Exchange Rule 15.1(a) states that
the Exchange may prescribe such reasonable dues, fees, assessments or
other charges as it may, in the Exchange discretion, deem appropriate.
In addition, paragraph 13 of the Exchange's User Agreement,\4\ which is
signed by all Members as part of their membership in the Exchange, also
provides that the Member agrees to pay the Exchange a late charge of 1%
per month on all past due amounts that are not the subject of a
legitimate and bona fide dispute. The Exchange proposes to codify this
language in Footnote d on its fee schedule stating that the Exchange
will assess a charge of 1% per month on the past due portion of the
balance on a Member's account that is past due. This fee will begin to
accrue on a daily basis for items not paid within the 30 day payment
terms until the item is paid in full. Late fees incurred will be
included as line items on subsequent invoices.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \4\ See the User Agreement posted to the Exchange's Web site at:
http://www.directedge.com/Portals/0/docs/MembDocs/EDGX%20Complete%20Exch%20Appl%201%20%28V%202.0%29.pdf.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    The Exchange proposes to implement these amendments to its fee
schedule on June 1, 2012.
Basis
    The Exchange believes that the proposed rule changes are consistent
with the objectives of Section 6 of the Act,\5\ in general, and
furthers the objectives of Section 6(b)(4),\6\ in particular, as it is
designed to provide for the equitable allocation of reasonable dues,
fees and other charges among its members and other persons using its
facilities.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \5\ 15 U.S.C. 78f.
    \6\ 15 U.S.C. 78f(b)(4).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    The Exchange proposes to amend the percentage associated with the
``added liquidity'' to ``removed liquidity'' ratio in part (ii) of the
Investor Tier (Footnote 13) from 70% to 60% because the Exchange
believes that a ratio of at least 60% represents a more appropriate
criterion for Members to qualify for a rebate of $0.0030 per share
associated with the Investor Tier. The Exchange believes the proposed
ratio incentivizes Members to direct a high quality order flow to the
Exchange because the Exchange believes that such high quality liquidity
provisions will encourage price discovery and market transparency and
improve investor protection by encouraging growth in liquidity. In
addition, the Exchange also believes that the proposal is non-
discriminatory because it applies uniformly to all Members.
    In order to provide additional transparency to Members, the
Exchange proposes to codify its existing policy regarding late fees in
Footnote d of the fee schedule. The Exchange believes that by including
proposed Footnote d it will help to promote market transparency and
improve investor protection by displaying the Exchange's policy
regarding late fees to Members on its fee schedule along with the
Exchange's other rebates and charges. The Exchange also notes that it
is equitable and reasonable to charge a Member a late fee on past due
balances because it offsets administrative and collection costs
associated with past due accounts and incentivizes Members to pay on
time in accordance with the terms of the Member's User Agreement. In
addition, a late fee of 1% is reasonable because it is in line with the
late fees assessed by other exchanges.\7\ The Exchange believes that
the proposal is non-discriminatory because it applies to all Members.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \7\ See also, the late fees listed on the Chicago Board Options
Exchange's fee schedule at: http://www.cboe.com/publish/feeschedule/CBOEFeeSchedule.pdf; and NASDAQ Rule 7032 regarding late fees.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    The Exchange also notes that it operates in a highly-competitive
market in which market participants can readily direct order flow to
competing venues if they deem fee levels at a particular venue to be
excessive. The proposed rule change reflects a competitive pricing
structure designed to incent market participants to direct their order
flow to the Exchange. The Exchange believes that the proposed rates are
equitable and non-discriminatory in that they apply uniformly to all
Members. The Exchange believes the fees and credits remain competitive
with those charged by other venues and therefore continue to be
reasonable and equitably allocated to Members.

B. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement on Burden on Competition

    The proposed rule change does not impose any burden on competition
that is not necessary or appropriate in furtherance of the purposes of
the Act.

C. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement on Comments on the Proposed
Rule Change Received From Members, Participants, or Others

    The Exchange has not solicited, and does not intend to solicit,
comments on this proposed rule change. The Exchange has not received
any unsolicited written comments from members or other interested
parties.

III. Date of Effectiveness of the Proposed Rule Change and Timing for
Commission Action

    The foregoing rule change has become effective pursuant to Section
19(b)(3) of the Act \8\ and Rule 19b-4(f)(2)\9\ thereunder. At any time
within 60 days of the filing of such proposed rule change, the
Commission summarily may temporarily suspend such rule change if it
appears to the Commission that such action is necessary or appropriate
in the public interest, for the protection of

investors, or otherwise in furtherance of the purposes of the Act.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \8\ 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(3)(A).
    \9\ 17 CFR 19b-4(f)(2).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

IV. Solicitation of Comments

    Interested persons are invited to submit written data, views, and
arguments concerning the foregoing, including whether the proposed rule
change is consistent with the Act. Comments may be submitted by any of
the following methods:

Electronic Comments

     Use the Commission's Internet comment form (http://www.sec.gov/rules/sro.shtml); or
     Send an email to<EMAIL_ADDRESS>Please include
File Number SR-EDGX-2012-19 on the subject line.

Paper Comments

     Send paper comments in triplicate to Elizabeth M. Murphy,
Secretary, Securities and Exchange Commission, 100 F Street NE.,
Washington, DC 20549-1090.

All submissions should refer to File Number SR-EDGX-2012-19. This file
number should be included on the subject line if email is used. To help
the Commission process and review your comments more efficiently,
please use only one method. The Commission will post all comments on
the Commission's Internet Web site (http://www.sec.gov/rules/sro.shtml). Copies of the submission, all subsequent amendments, all
written statements with respect to the proposed rule change that are
filed with the Commission, and all written communications relating to
the proposed rule change between the Commission and any person, other
than those that may be withheld from the public in accordance with the
provisions of 5 U.S.C. 552, will be available for Web site viewing and
printing in the Commission's Public Reference Room, 100 F Street NE.,
Washington, DC 20549, on official business days between the hours of
10:00 a.m. and 3:00 p.m. Copies of the filing also will be available
for inspection and copying at the principal office of the Exchange. All
comments received will be posted without change; the Commission does
not edit personal identifying information from submissions. You should
submit only information that you wish to make available publicly. All
submissions should refer to File Number SR-EDGX-2012-19 and should be
submitted on or before July 5, 2012.

    For the Commission, by the Division of Trading and Markets,
pursuant to delegated authority.\10\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \10\ 17 CFR 200.30-3(a)(12).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

Kevin M. O'Neill,
Deputy Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2012-14341 Filed 6-12-12; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 8011-01-P