[Federal Register Volume 79, Number 87 (Tuesday, May 6, 2014)]
[Notices]
[Pages 25951-25954]
[FR Doc No: 2014-10285]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

[Release No. 34-72049; File No. SR-ISE-2014-25]

Self-Regulatory Organizations; International Securities Exchange,
LLC; Notice of Filing of Proposed Rule Change To Amend ISE Rule 2128
Relating to Clearly Erroneous Trades

April 30, 2014.
    Pursuant to Section 19(b)(1) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934
(the ``Act''),\1\ and Rule 19b-4 thereunder,\2\ notice is hereby given
that on April 17, 2014 the International Securities Exchange, LLC (the
``Exchange'' or the ``ISE'') filed with the Securities and Exchange
Commission (``Commission'') the proposed rule change as described in
Items I and II below, which items have been prepared by the Exchange.
The Commission is publishing this notice to solicit comments on the
proposed rule change from interested persons.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \1\ 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(1).
    \2\ 17 CFR 240.19b-4.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

I. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement of the Terms of the
Substance of the Proposed Rule Change

    The Exchange proposes to add new paragraphs (j) and (k) to Rule
2128, entitled ``Clearly Erroneous Trades.'' The text of the proposed
rule change is available on the Exchange's Web site www.ise.com, at the
principal office of the Exchange, and at the Commission's Public
Reference Room.

II. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement of the Purpose of, and
Statutory Basis for, the Proposed Rule Change

    In its filing with the Commission, the Exchange included statements
concerning the purpose of, and basis for, the proposed rule change and
discussed any comments it received on the proposed rule change. The
text of these statements may be examined at the places specified in
Item IV below. The self-regulatory organization has prepared summaries,
set forth in Sections A, B and C below, of the most significant aspects
of such statements.

A. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement of the Purpose of, and
Statutory Basis for, the Proposed Rule Change

1. Purpose
    The purpose of this filing is to add new paragraph (j) to Rule 2128
to provide the Exchange with authority to nullify transactions that
were effected based on the same fundamentally incorrect or grossly
misinterpreted issuance information even if such transactions occur
over a period of several days, as further described below. An example
of fundamentally incorrect and grossly misinterpreted issuance
information that led to a severe valuation error is included below for
illustrative purposes.
    The Exchange also proposes to add new paragraph (k) to Rule 2128 to
make clear that in the event of any disruption or malfunction in the
operation of the electronic communications and trading facilities of
the Exchange, another market center or responsible single plan
processor in connection with the transmittal or receipt of a regulatory
trading halt, suspension or pause (hereafter generally referred to as a
``trading halt'' for ease of reference), the Exchange will nullify any
transaction that occurs after the primary listing market for a security
declares a trading halt with respect to such security. In the event a
trading halt is declared, then prematurely lifted in error, and then
re-instituted, proposed paragraph (k) would also result in
nullification of any transactions that occur before the official, final
end of the trading halt according to the primary listing market.
    The Exchange also proposes a change to certain cross-references in
Rule 2128, due to the addition of paragraphs (j) and (k). Specifically,
the Exchange proposes to update cross-references in existing paragraph
(i) of Rule 2128 in order to make clear that the provisions of
paragraph (i) do not alter the application of other provisions of Rule
2128, including new paragraphs (j) and (k).
Background
    On September 10, 2010, the Commission approved, on a pilot basis,
changes to Rule 2128 to provide for uniform treatment: (1) Of clearly
erroneous execution reviews in multi-stock events involving twenty or
more securities; and (2) in the event transactions occur that result in
the issuance of an individual stock trading pause by the primary
listing market and subsequent transactions that occur before the
trading pause is in effect on the Exchange.\3\ The Exchange also
adopted additional changes to Rule 2128 that reduced the ability of the
Exchange to deviate from the objective standards set forth in Rule
2128,\4\ and in 2013, adopted a provision designed to address the
operation of the Plan to Address Extraordinary Market Volatility
Pursuant to Rule 608 of Regulation NMS under the Act (the ``Limit Up-
Limit Down Plan'' or the ``Plan'').\5\ In September 2013, the Exchange
removed the specific provisions related to individual stock trading
pauses and extended to April 8, 2014 the pilot program applicable to
certain provisions of Rule 2128,\6\ and, most recently, in March 2014
further extended this pilot program to coincide with the pilot period
for the Plan.\7\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \3\ Securities Exchange Act Release No. 62886 (Sept. 10, 2010),
75 FR 56613 (Sept. 16, 2010) (SR-ISE-2010-62).
    \4\ Id.
    \5\ See Securities Exchange Act Release No. 68822 (Feb. 4,
2013), 78 FR 9440 (Feb. 8, 2013) (SR-ISE-2013-12); Securities
Exchange Act Release No. 67091 (May 31, 2012), 77 FR 33498 (June 6,
2012) (the ``Limit Up-Limit Down Release''); see also ISE Rule
2128(i).
    \6\ See Securities Exchange Act Release No. 70510 (September 26,
2013), 78 FR 60991 (October 2, 2013) (SR-ISE-2013-49).
    \7\ Paragraphs (c), (e)(2), (f), (g), and (i) of Rule 2128 are
currently subject to a pilot program. See Securities Exchange Act
Release No. 71806 (March 26, 2014), 79 FR 18375 (April 1, 2014) (SR-
ISE-2014-19).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    As proposed, similar to other provisions added in recent years, as
described above, both paragraph (j) and paragraph (k) would be subject
to a pilot period, which will coincide with the pilot period for the
Limit Up-Limit Down Plan, including any extensions to the pilot period
for the Plan.
Executions Based on Incorrect or Grossly Misinterpreted Issuance
Information
    The Exchange proposes to adopt a new provision, paragraph (j), to
Rule 2128, which would provide that a series of transactions in a
particular security on one or more trading days may be viewed as one
event if all such transactions were effected based on the same
fundamentally incorrect or grossly misinterpreted issuance information
(e.g., with respect to a stock split or corporate dividend) resulting
in a severe valuation error for all such transactions (the ``Event'').
    As proposed, an Officer of the Exchange or senior level employee
designee, acting on his or her own motion, would be required to take
action to declare all transactions that occurred during the Event null
and void not later than the start of trading on the day following the
last transaction in the

Event. If trading in the security is halted before the valuation error
is corrected, the Officer of the Exchange or senior level employee
designee would be required to take action to declare all transactions
that occurred during the Event null and void prior to the resumption of
trading. The Exchange proposes to make clear that no action can be
taken pursuant to proposed paragraph (j) with respect to any
transactions that have reached settlement date for the security or that
result from an initial public offering of a security. The Exchange
believes that declaring a trade null and void after settlement date
would be complex to administer and unfair to the affected parties. The
Exchange also believes that excluding IPOs from the proposed rule will
ensure that transactions in a new security for which there is no
benchmark information are not called into question, as it is the IPO
process itself, including the extensive public disclosure associated
with IPOs, that is intended to drive price formation.
    Further, the Exchange proposes that to the extent transactions
related to an Event occur on one or more other market centers, the
Exchange will promptly coordinate with such other market center(s) to
ensure consistent treatment of the transactions related to the Event,
if practicable. The Exchange also proposes to state in the Rule that
any action taken in connection with paragraph (j) will be taken without
regard to the Numerical Guidelines set forth in paragraph (c)(1) of
Rule 2128. In particular, the Exchange believes that there could be
scenarios where there are erroneous transactions related to an Event
that do not meet applicable Numerical Guidelines but that are, upon
review, clearly erroneous. One example of a situation that could occur
is a corporate action, such as a stock split, that results in the
dissemination of fundamentally incorrect or grossly misinterpreted
issuance information and leads to erroneous transactions at a price
that is close to the price at which the security was previously
trading. Even if such trading is consistent with prior trading activity
for the security, and thus would not meet applicable Numerical
Guidelines, the Exchange would have the authority to nullify such
transactions if they were affected based on the same fundamentally
incorrect or grossly misinterpreted issuance information and there was
a severe valuation error as a result (i.e., although the security
should be trading at a price further away from its previous range, due
to fundamentally incorrect or grossly misinterpreted issuance
information with respect to the corporate action the security continues
to trade at a price that does not meet applicable Numerical
Guidelines).
    The Exchange also proposes to an include a provision, as it does in
many other sub-paragraphs of Rule 2128, stating that each Member
involved in a transaction subject to proposed paragraph (j) shall be
notified as soon as practicable by the Exchange, and that the party
aggrieved by the action may appeal such action in accordance with
Exchange Rule 2128(e)(2)-(4).
    In particular, the Exchange believes it is necessary to have
authority to nullify trades that occur in an event similar to an event
involving an exchange offer (``Exchange Offer'') made by U.S. Bancorp
on the New York Stock Exchange (``NYSE'') in 2010 in which there were a
series of executions based on incorrect or grossly misinterpreted
issuance information. As a result of such information, the securities
traded at severely dislocated prices. At the time, the NYSE filed an
emergency rule filing in order to respond to that event.\8\ With the
filing the NYSE interpreted the rule applicable to clearly erroneous
executions as permitting the NYSE to nullify all trades resulting after
the Exchange Offer at severely dislocated prices.\9\ The Exchange
believes it is important to have in place a rule to break such trades
if an event like the U.S. Bancorp event occurs again in the future. The
U.S. Bancorp event is described in further detail below and is intended
to be illustrative of the manner in which the Exchange proposes to
utilize proposed paragraph (j), if necessary.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \8\ Securities Exchange Act Release No. 62609 (July 30, 2010),
75 FR 47327 (August 5, 2010) (SR-NYSE-2010-55).
    \9\ Id.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    In May 2010, U.S. Bancorp commenced an offer to exchange up to
1,250,000 Depositary Shares, each representing a 1/100 interest in a
share of Series A Non-Cumulative Perpetual Preferred Stock, $100,000
liquidation preference per share (the ``Depositary Shares'') for any
and all of the 1,250,000 outstanding 6.189% Fixed-to-Floating Rate
Normal ITS issued by U.S. Bancorp Capital IX, each with a liquidation
amount of $1,000 (the ``Normal ITS''). The Depositary Shares were
approved for listing on the NYSE under the symbol USB PRA. On June 11,
2010, the NYSE opened the shares on a quote, but trading did not
commence until June 16, 2010 at prices in the range of $79.00 per
share. There were additional executions on the NYSE in that price range
on June 17 and 18, 2010. On June 18, 2010, NYSE staff learned that the
prices at which trades had executed were not consistent with the value
of the security, which was closer to an $800 price. Upon learning of
the pricing disparity, NYSE immediately halted trading in the
Depositary Shares on all markets and alerted U.S. Bancorp and other
exchanges that traded the Depositary Shares of the pricing discrepancy.
    In order to address the situation, the NYSE filed a proposal to
interpret its existing clearly erroneous execution rule such that the
trading in Depository Shares from June 16 to June 18 constituted a
single event because that trading was based on incorrect or grossly
misinterpreted issuance information that resulted in severe price
dislocation (the ``U.S. Bancorp Event'').\10\ Because the Depository
Shares were halted before the price of the Depository Shares ceased to
be dislocated, and remain halted, the NYSE was able to review trading
in Depository Shares and declare null and void all trading in the U.S.
Bancorp Event before the security resumed trading.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \10\ Id.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    Rather than filing a proposal in response to a similar event
happening again, the Exchange proposes to add paragraph (j) in order to
nullify transactions consistent with the description of the proposed
Rule above.
Executions After a Trading Halt Has Been Declared
    The Exchange proposes to add new paragraph (k) to Rule 2128 to make
clear that in the event of any disruption or malfunction in the
operation of the electronic communications and trading facilities of
the Exchange, another market center or responsible single plan
processor in connection with the transmittal or receipt of a trading
halt, the Exchange will nullify any transaction that occurs after the
primary listing market for a security declares a trading halt and
before such trading halt with respect to such security has officially
ended according to the primary listing market. In addition, proposed
paragraph (k) will make clear that in the event a trading halt is
declared, then prematurely lifted in error and then re-instituted, the
Exchange will nullify transactions that occur before the official,
final end of the trading halt according to the primary listing market.
    As with other provisions in Rule 2128, including proposed paragraph
(j) as discussed above, the authority to nullify transactions pursuant
to paragraph (k) would be vested in an officer of the Exchange or other
senior

level employee designee, acting on his or her own motion. Any action
taken in connection with paragraph (k) would be taken in a timely
fashion, generally within thirty (30) minutes of the detection of the
erroneous transaction and in no circumstances later than the start of
the Regular Market Session \11\ on the trading day following the date
of execution(s) under review. The Exchange also proposes to specify
that any action taken in connection with proposed paragraph (k) will be
taken without regard to the Numerical Guidelines set forth in paragraph
(c)(1) of Rule 2128. The Exchange believes it is appropriate to act to
nullify transactions pursuant to proposed paragraph (k) without regard
to applicable Numerical Guidelines because in the situations covered by
paragraph (k), such transactions should not have occurred in the first
instance, and thus, their nullification does not put parties in any
different position than they should have been. The Exchange also
believes that the certainty that the proposed rule provides is critical
in situations involving trading halts.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \11\ The Regular Market Session Regular Market Session commences
at 9:30 a.m. Eastern Time. See ISE Rules 2102 and 2106.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    As it has proposed for paragraph (j), as described above, the
Exchange also proposes to an include a provision stating that each
Member involved in a transaction subject to proposed paragraph (k)
shall be notified as soon as practicable by the Exchange, and that the
party aggrieved by the action may appeal such action in accordance with
Exchange Rule 2128(e)(2)-(4).
    The Exchange notes that trading in a security is typically halted
immediately on the Exchange when the primary listing market issues a
trading halt in such security. However, in certain circumstances, due
to a technical issue related to the transmission or receipt of the
electronic message instituting such trading halt or due to other
extraordinary circumstances, executions can occur on the Exchange
following the declaration of such a trading halt. Similarly, although
rare, the Exchange has witnessed scenarios where due to extraordinary
circumstances a trading halt is declared, then prematurely lifted in
error and then re-instituted. It is these types of extraordinary
circumstances that the Exchange believes require certainty, and thus,
the Exchange believes it necessary to make clear that in such a
circumstance any transactions after a trading halt has been declared
will be nullified. In the event that a trading halt is declared as of a
future time (i.e., if the primary listing exchange declares a trading
halt as of a specific, future time in order to ensure coordination
amongst market participants), the Exchange would only nullify
transactions occurring after the time the trading halt was supposed to
be in place until the official end of the trading halt according to the
primary listing market.
    The Exchange also notes that it currently has authority pursuant to
paragraph (f) of Rule 2128 to review and nullify transactions that
arise during a disruption or malfunction in the operation of any
electronic communications and trading facilities of the Exchange.
Further, paragraph (f) of Rule 2128 gives the Exchange authority to use
a lower numerical guideline than is set forth in paragraph (c)(1) of
the Rule when necessary to maintain a fair and orderly market and to
protect investors and the public interest. Thus, while the Exchange
believes that paragraph (f) does give the Exchange the authority to
nullify transactions occurring when there is an Exchange technical
issue related to the transmission or receipt of the electronic message
instituting a trading halt or with respect to a technical issue related
to a prematurely lifted trading halt, the Exchange believes that
proposed paragraph (k) will provide appropriate authority for the
Exchange to nullify all such transactions whether or not the systems
problem occurs on the Exchange with respect to trading halts and
explicit clarity for market participants that such transactions will be
nullified. The Exchange believes that such authority is appropriate
because when relied upon the Exchange will be cancelling trades that
should not have occurred in the first instance. Finally, the Exchange
believes that such authority is appropriate because a trading halt
declared by the primary listing market is indicative of an issue with
respect to the applicable security or a larger set of securities.
2. Statutory Basis
    The Exchange believes that its proposal is consistent with the
requirements of the Act and the rules and regulations thereunder that
are applicable to a national securities exchange, and, in particular,
with the requirements of Section 6(b) of the Act.\12\ In particular,
the proposal is consistent with Section 6(b)(5) of the Act,\13\ because
it would promote just and equitable principles of trade, remove
impediments to, and perfect the mechanism of, a free and open market
and a national market system.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \12\ 15 U.S.C. 78f(b).
    \13\ 15 U.S.C. 78f(b)(5).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    The Exchange believes that it is appropriate to adopt a provision
granting the Exchange authority to nullify trades that occur if an
Event similar to the U.S. Bancorp Event occurs again. The Exchange
believes that this provision will allow the Exchange to act in the
event of such a severe valuation error, that such action would promote
just and equitable principles of trade and that the proposal is
therefore consistent with the Act. Similarly, the Exchange believes
that adding a provision allowing the Exchange to nullify transactions
that occur when a trading halt is declared, then prematurely lifted in
error and then reinstituted, and providing that in the event of any
disruption or malfunction in the operation of the electronic
communications and trading facilities of the Exchange, another market
center or responsible single plan processor in connection with the
transmittal or receipt of a trading halt the Exchange will nullify
trades occurring after a trading halt has been declared by the primary
listing market for the security will help to avoid confusion amongst
market participants, which is consistent with the protection of
investors and the public interest and therefore consistent with the
Act. The Exchange further believes that the proposal is appropriate and
consistent with the Act because when relied upon the Exchange will be
cancelling trades that should not have occurred in the first instance.
The Exchange also believes that the proposal is appropriate because a
trading halt declared by the primary listing market is indicative of an
issue with respect to the applicable security or a larger set of
securities.
    The Exchange believes that the proposal to update cross-references
in existing paragraph (i) of Rule 2128 to include new paragraphs (j)
and (k) is consistent with the Act because, as is the case with respect
to the current rule, this change makes clear that the provisions of
paragraph (i) do not alter the application of other provisions of Rule
2128.
    The Exchange believes that the Financial Industry Regulatory
Authority (``FINRA'') and other national securities exchanges are also
filing similar proposals to add provisions similar to the provisions
proposed by the Exchange above. Therefore, the proposal promotes just
and equitable principles of trade in that it promotes transparency and
uniformity across markets concerning treatment of transactions as
clearly erroneous. The proposed rule change would also help to assure

consistent results in handling erroneous trades across the U.S.
markets, thus furthering fair and orderly markets, the protection of
investors and the public interest.

B. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement on Burden on Competition

    The Exchange does not believe that the proposed rule change
implicates any competitive issues. To the contrary, as noted above, the
Exchange believes FINRA and other national securities exchanges are
also filing similar proposals, and thus, that the proposal will help to
ensure consistency across market centers.

C. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement on Comments on the Proposed
Rule Change Received From Members, Participants, or Others

    The Exchange has not solicited, and does not intend to solicit,
comments on this proposed rule change. The Exchange has not received
any written comments from members or other interested parties.

III. Date of Effectiveness of the Proposed Rule Change and Timing for
Commission Action

    Within 45 days of the date of publication of this notice in the
Federal Register or within such longer period up to 90 days (i) as the
Commission may designate if it finds such longer period to be
appropriate and publishes its reasons for so finding or (ii) as to
which the self-regulatory organization consents, the Commission will:
    (A) by order approve or disapprove the proposed rule change, or
    (B) institute proceedings to determine whether the proposed rule
change should be disapproved.

IV. Solicitation of Comments

    Interested persons are invited to submit written data, views, and
arguments concerning the foregoing, including whether the proposed rule
change is consistent with the Act. Comments may be submitted by any of
the following methods:

Electronic Comments

     Use the Commission's Internet comment form (http://www.sec.gov/rules/sro.shtml); or
     Send an email to<EMAIL_ADDRESS>Please include
File Number SR-ISE-2014-25 on the subject line.

Paper Comments

     Send paper comments in triplicate to Secretary, Securities
and Exchange Commission, 100 F Street NE., Washington, DC 20549-1090.

All submissions should refer to File Number SR-ISE-2014-25. This file
number should be included on the subject line if email is used. To help
the Commission process and review your comments more efficiently,
please use only one method. The Commission will post all comments on
the Commission's Internet Web site (http://www.sec.gov/rules/sro.shtml). Copies of the submission, all subsequent amendments, all
written statements with respect to the proposed rule change that are
filed with the Commission, and all written communications relating to
the proposed rule change between the Commission and any person, other
than those that may be withheld from the public in accordance with the
provisions of 5 U.S.C. 552, will be available for Web site viewing and
printing in the Commission's Public Reference Room, 100 F Street NE.,
Washington, DC 20549 on official business days between the hours of
10:00 a.m. and 3:00 p.m. Copies of such filing also will be available
for inspection and copying at the principal office of the Exchange. All
comments received will be posted without change; the Commission does
not edit personal identifying information from submissions. You should
submit only information that you wish to make available publicly. All
submissions should refer to File Number SR-ISE-2014-25, and should be
submitted on or before May 27, 2014.
For the Commission, by the Division of Trading and Markets, pursuant to
delegated authority.\14\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \14\ 17 CFR 200.30-3(a)(12).

Kevin M. O'Neill,
Deputy Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2014-10285 Filed 5-5-14; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 8011-01-P


[Federal Register Volume 83, Number 226 (Friday, November 23, 2018)]
[Notices]
[Pages 59394-59397]
[FR Doc No: 2018-25545]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY

Federal Emergency Management Agency

[Docket ID FEMA-2018-0002; Internal Agency Docket No. FEMA-B-1866]

Changes in Flood Hazard Determinations

AGENCY: Federal Emergency Management Agency, DHS.

ACTION: Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: This notice lists communities where the addition or
modification of Base Flood Elevations (BFEs), base flood depths,
Special Flood Hazard Area (SFHA) boundaries or zone designations, or
the regulatory floodway (hereinafter referred to as flood hazard
determinations), as shown on the Flood Insurance Rate Maps (FIRMs), and
where applicable, in the supporting Flood Insurance Study (FIS)
reports, prepared by the Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA) for
each community, is appropriate because of new scientific or technical
data. The

FIRM, and where applicable, portions of the FIS report, have been
revised to reflect these flood hazard determinations through issuance
of a Letter of Map Revision (LOMR), in accordance with Federal
Regulations. The LOMR will be used by insurance agents and others to
calculate appropriate flood insurance premium rates for new buildings
and the contents of those buildings. For rating purposes, the currently
effective community number is shown in the table below and must be used
for all new policies and renewals.

DATES: These flood hazard determinations will be finalized on the dates
listed in the table below and revise the FIRM panels and FIS report in
effect prior to this determination for the listed communities.
    From the date of the second publication of notification of these
changes in a newspaper of local circulation, any person has 90 days in
which to request through the community that the Deputy Associate
Administrator for Insurance and Mitigation reconsider the changes. The
flood hazard determination information may be changed during the 90-day
period.

ADDRESSES: The affected communities are listed in the table below.
Revised flood hazard information for each community is available for
inspection at both the online location and the respective community map
repository address listed in the table below. Additionally, the current
effective FIRM and FIS report for each community are accessible online
through the FEMA Map Service Center at https://msc.fema.gov for
comparison.
    Submit comments and/or appeals to the Chief Executive Officer of
the community as listed in the table below.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Rick Sacbibit, Chief, Engineering
Services Branch, Federal Insurance and Mitigation Administration, FEMA,
400 C Street SW, Washington, DC 20472,<PHONE_NUMBER>, or (email)
[email protected]; or visit the FEMA Map Information
eXchange (FMIX) online at https://www.floodmaps.fema.gov/fhm/fmx_main.html.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The specific flood hazard determinations are
not described for each community in this notice. However, the online
location and local community map repository address where the flood
hazard determination information is available for inspection is
provided.
    Any request for reconsideration of flood hazard determinations must
be submitted to the Chief Executive Officer of the community as listed
in the table below.
    The modifications are made pursuant to section 201 of the Flood
Disaster Protection Act of 1973, 42 U.S.C. 4105, and are in accordance
with the National Flood Insurance Act of 1968, 42 U.S.C. 4001 et seq.,
and with 44 CFR part 65.
    The FIRM and FIS report are the basis of the floodplain management
measures that the community is required either to adopt or to show
evidence of having in effect in order to qualify or remain qualified
for participation in the National Flood Insurance Program (NFIP).
    These flood hazard determinations, together with the floodplain
management criteria required by 44 CFR 60.3, are the minimum that are
required. They should not be construed to mean that the community must
change any existing ordinances that are more stringent in their
floodplain management requirements. The community may at any time enact
stricter requirements of its own or pursuant to policies established by
other Federal, State, or regional entities. The flood hazard
determinations are in accordance with 44 CFR 65.4.
    The affected communities are listed in the following table. Flood
hazard determination information for each community is available for
inspection at both the online location and the respective community map
repository address listed in the table below. Additionally, the current
effective FIRM and FIS report for each community are accessible online
through the FEMA Map Service Center at https://msc.fema.gov for
comparison.

(Catalog of Federal Domestic Assistance No. 97.022, ``Flood
Insurance.'')

David I. Maurstad,
Deputy Associate Administrator for Insurance and Mitigation, Department
of Homeland Security, Federal Emergency Management Agency.

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
                                                         Chief executive                          Online location of
        State and county           Location and case        officer of         Community map        letter of map      Date of modification   Community
                                          No.               community            repository            revision                                  No.
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Connecticut: Fairfield..........  Town of Newtown (18- The Honorable Dan    Town Hall, 3         https://             Feb. 19, 2019........       090011
                                   01-0540P).           Rosenthal, First     Primrose Street,     msc.fema.gov/
                                                        Selectman, Town of   Newtown, CT 06470.   portal/
                                                        Newtown Board of                          advanceSearch.
                                                        Selectmen, 3
                                                        Primrose Street,
                                                        Newtown, CT 06470.
Delaware: Kent..................  City of Dover (18-   The Honorable Robin  Department of        https://             Jan. 29, 2019........       100006
                                   03-1850P).           R. Christiansen,     Planning and         msc.fema.gov/
                                                        Mayor, City of       Inspections, 15      portal/
                                                        Dover, P.O. Box      Loockerman Plaza,    advanceSearch.
                                                        475, Dover, DE       Dover, DE 19901.
                                                        19903.
Florida:
    Collier.....................  City of Marco        The Honorable Jared  Building             https://             Feb. 1, 2019.........       120426
                                   Island (18-04-       Grifoni, Chairman,   Department, 50       msc.fema.gov/
                                   4433P).              City of Marco        Bald Eagle Drive,    portal/
                                                        Island Council, 50   Marco Island, FL     advanceSearch.
                                                        Bald Eagle Drive,    34145.
                                                        Marco Island, FL
                                                        34145.
    Miami-Dade..................  City of Miami (18-   The Honorable        Building             https://             Feb. 13, 2019........       120650
                                   04-4671P).           Francis Suarez,      Department, 444      msc.fema.gov/
                                                        Mayor, City of       Southwest 2nd        portal/
                                                        Miami, 3500 Pan      Avenue, 4th Floor,   advanceSearch.
                                                        American Drive,      Miami, FL 33130.
                                                        Miami, FL 33133.
    Monroe......................  City of Layton (18-  The Honorable        Building             https://             Feb. 8, 2019.........       120169
                                   04-5816P).           Norman S.            Department, 68280    msc.fema.gov/
                                                        Anderson, Mayor,     Overseas Highway,    portal/
                                                        City of Layton,      Long Key, FL 33001.  advanceSearch.
                                                        P.O. Box 778, Long
                                                        Key, FL 33001.
    Monroe......................  City of Layton (18-  The Honorable        Building             https://             Feb. 14, 2019........       120169
                                   04-5890P).           Norman S.            Department, 68280    msc.fema.gov/
                                                        Anderson, Mayor,     Overseas Highway,    portal/
                                                        City of Layton,      Long Key, FL 33001.  advanceSearch.
                                                        P.O. Box 778, Long
                                                        Key, FL 33001.

    Monroe......................  Unincorporated       The Honorable David  Monroe County        https://             Feb. 19, 2019........       125129
                                   areas of Monroe      Rice, Mayor,         Building             msc.fema.gov/
                                   County (18-04-       Monroe County        Department, 2798     portal/
                                   5923P).              Board of             Overseas Highway,    advanceSearch.
                                                        Commissioners,       Suite 300,
                                                        9400 Overseas        Marathon, FL 33050.
                                                        Highway, Suite
                                                        210, Marathon, FL
                                                        33050.
    Monroe......................  Village of           The Honorable Chris  Planning and         https://             Feb. 7, 2019.........       120424
                                   Islamorada (18-04-   Sante, Mayor,        Development          msc.fema.gov/
                                   5780P).              Village of           Department, 86800    portal/
                                                        Islamorada, 86800    Overseas Highway,    advanceSearch.
                                                        Overseas Highway,    Islamorada, FL
                                                        Islamorada, FL       33036.
                                                        33036.
    Monroe......................  Village of           The Honorable Chris  Planning and         https://             Feb. 19, 2019........       120424
                                   Islamorada (18-04-   Sante, Mayor,        Development          msc.fema.gov/
                                   6933P).              Village of           Department, 86800    portal/
                                                        Islamorada, 86800    Overseas Highway,    advanceSearch.
                                                        Overseas Highway,    Islamorada, FL
                                                        Islamorada, FL       33036.
                                                        33036.
    Orange......................  City of Orlando (18- The Honorable Buddy  Public Works         https://             Feb. 1, 2019.........       120186
                                   04-3956P).           W. Dyer, Mayor,      Department,          msc.fema.gov/
                                                        City of Orlando,     Engineering          portal/
                                                        P.O. Box 4990,       Division, 400        advanceSearch.
                                                        Orlando, FL 32802.   South Orange
                                                                             Avenue, 8th Floor,
                                                                             Orlando, FL 32801.
    Osceola.....................  City of St. Cloud    Mr. Bill Sturgeon,   Public Services      https://             Feb. 7, 2019.........       120191
                                   (18-04-5710P).       Manager, City of     Department, 1300     msc.fema.gov/
                                                        St. Cloud, 1300      9th Street, St.      portal/
                                                        9th Street, St.      Cloud, FL 34769.     advanceSearch.
                                                        Cloud, FL 34769.
    Pinellas....................  Town of Indian       The Honorable        Building             https://             Feb. 11, 2019........       125118
                                   Shores (18-04-       Patrick Soranno,     Department, 19305    msc.fema.gov/
                                   5445P).              Mayor, Town of       Gulf Boulevard,      portal/
                                                        Indian Shores,       Indian Shores, FL    advanceSearch.
                                                        19305 Gulf           33785.
                                                        Boulevard, Indian
                                                        Shores, FL 33785.
    Polk........................  Unincorporated       The Honorable R.     Polk County          https://             Feb. 14, 2019........       120261
                                   areas of Polk        Todd Dantzler,       Floodplain           msc.fema.gov/
                                   County (18-04-       Chairman, Polk       Department, 330      portal/
                                   6600P).              County Board of      West Church          advanceSearch.
                                                        Commissioners, 330   Street, Bartow, FL
                                                        West Church          33831.
                                                        Street, Bartow, FL
                                                        33831.
Louisiana:
    Lafayette...................  Unincorporated       The Honorable Joel   Lafayette Parish,    https://             Feb. 1, 2019.........       220101
                                   areas of Lafayette   Robideaux, Mayor-    Department of        msc.fema.gov/
                                   Parish (18-06-       President,           Planning and         portal/
                                   3630P).              Lafayette            Development, 220     advanceSearch.
                                                        Consolidated         West Willow
                                                        Government, P.O.     Street, Building
                                                        Box 4017-C,          B, Lafayette, LA
                                                        Lafayette, LA        70501.
                                                        70502.
    Morehouse...................  Unincorporated       The Honorable Terry  Morehouse Parish     https://             Feb. 11, 2019........       220367
                                   areas of Morehouse   Matthews,            Police Jury, 125     msc.fema.gov/
                                   Parish (18-06-       President,           East Madison         portal/
                                   2764P).              Morehouse Parish     Avenue, Bastrop,     advanceSearch.
                                                        Police Jury, 125     LA 71220.
                                                        East Madison
                                                        Avenue, Bastrop,
                                                        LA 71220.
Maine: York.....................  City of Saco (18-01- The Honorable        City Hall, 300 Main  https://             Feb. 4, 2019.........       230155
                                   0986P).              Marston D. Lovell,   Street, Saco, ME     msc.fema.gov/
                                                        Mayor, City of       04072.               portal/
                                                        Saco, 300 Main                            advanceSearch.
                                                        Street, Saco, ME
                                                        04072.
New Mexico:
    Bernalillo..................  City of Albuquerque  The Honorable        Planning             https://             Feb. 11, 2019........       350002
                                   (18-06-1222P).       Timothy M. Keller,   Department, 600      msc.fema.gov/
                                                        Mayor, City of       2nd Street           portal/
                                                        Albuquerque, P.O.    Northwest,           advanceSearch.
                                                        Box 1293,            Albuquerque, NM
                                                        Albuquerque, NM      87102.
                                                        87103.
    Bernalillo..................  City of Albuquerque  The Honorable        Planning             https://             Feb. 8, 2019.........       350002
                                   (18-06-1705P).       Timothy M. Keller,   Department, 600      msc.fema.gov/
                                                        Mayor, City of       2nd Street           portal/
                                                        Albuquerque, P.O.    Northwest,           advanceSearch.
                                                        Box 1293,            Albuquerque, NM
                                                        Albuquerque, NM      87102.
                                                        87103.
North Carolina: Franklin........  Unincorporated       Ms. Angela L.        Franklin County      https://             Feb. 1, 2019.........       370377
                                   areas of Franklin    Harris, Manager,     Planning and         msc.fema.gov/
                                   County (18-04-       Franklin County,     Inspections          portal/
                                   5161P).              113 Market Street,   Department, 215      advanceSearch.
                                                        Louisburg, NC        East Nash Street,
                                                        27549.               Louisburg, NC
                                                                             27549.
North Dakota: Stark.............  City of Dickinson    The Honorable Scott  City Hall, 99 2nd    https://             Feb. 20, 2019........       380117
                                   (18-08-0776P).       Decker, Mayor,       Street East,         msc.fema.gov/
                                                        City of Dickinson,   Dickinson, ND        portal/
                                                        99 2nd Street        58601.               advanceSearch.
                                                        East, Dickinson,
                                                        ND 58601.
Oklahoma:
    Pottawatomie................  City of McLoud (17-  The Honorable Stan   Pottawatomie County  https://             Jan. 30, 2019........       400398
                                   06-1163P).           Jackson, Mayor,      Commissioner's       msc.fema.gov/
                                                        City of McLoud,      Office, 14101 Acme   portal/
                                                        P.O. Box 300,        Road, Shawnee, OK    advanceSearch.
                                                        McLoud, OK 74851.    74801.

    Pottawatomie................  Unincorporated       The Honorable John   Pottawatomie County  https://             Jan. 30, 2019........       400496
                                   areas of             G. Canavan, Jr.,     Commissioner's       msc.fema.gov/
                                   Pottawatomie         Pottawatomie         Office, 14101 Acme   portal/
                                   County (17-06-       County Judge, 325    Road, Shawnee, OK    advanceSearch.
                                   1163P).              North Broadway       74801.
                                                        Avenue, Shawnee,
                                                        OK 74801.
South Carolina: York............  Unincorporated       The Honorable Britt  York County Heckle   https://             Feb. 11, 2019........       450193
                                   areas of York        Blackwell,           Complex, 1070        msc.fema.gov/
                                   County (18-04-       Chairman, York       Heckle Boulevard,    portal/
                                   1779P).              County Council,      Suite 107, York,     advanceSearch.
                                                        P.O. Box 66, York,   SC 29732.
                                                        SC 29745.
Texas:
    Bexar.......................  Unincorporated       The Honorable        Bexar County         https://             Jan. 28, 2019........       480035
                                   areas of Bexar       Nelson W. Wolff,     Department of        msc.fema.gov/
                                   County (18-06-       Bexar County         Public Works, 233    portal/
                                   1356P).              Judge, 101 West      North Pecos, Suite   advanceSearch.
                                                        Nueva, 10th Floor,   420, San Antonio,
                                                        San Antonio, TX      TX 78207.
                                                        78205.
    Bexar.......................  Unincorporated       The Honorable        Bexar County         https://             Jan. 28, 2019........       480035
                                   areas of Bexar       Nelson W. Wolff,     Department of        msc.fema.gov/
                                   County (18-06-       Bexar County         Public Works, 233    portal/
                                   1991P).              Judge, 101 West      North Pecos, Suite   advanceSearch.
                                                        Nueva, 10th Floor,   420, San Antonio,
                                                        San Antonio, TX      TX 78207.
                                                        78205.
    Denton......................  City of Justin (18-  The Honorable David  Planning and Zoning  https://             Feb. 7, 2019.........       480778
                                   06-1570P).           Wilson, Mayor,       Department, 415      msc.fema.gov/
                                                        City of Justin,      North College        portal/
                                                        P.O. Box 129,        Avenue, Justin, TX   advanceSearch.
                                                        Justin, TX 76247.    76247.
    Denton......................  Unincorporated       The Honorable Mary   Denton County        https://             Feb. 7, 2019.........       480774
                                   areas of Denton      Horn, Denton         Public Works,        msc.fema.gov/
                                   County (18-06-       County Judge, 110    Engineering          portal/
                                   1570P).              West Hickory         Department, 1505     advanceSearch.
                                                        Street, 2nd Floor,   East McKinney
                                                        Denton, TX 76201.    Street, Suite 175,
                                                                             Denton, TX 76209.
    Harris......................  City of Baytown (18- The Honorable        Engineering          https://             Jan. 22, 2019........       485456
                                   06-2955P).           Stephen DonCarlos,   Department, 2123     msc.fema.gov/
                                                        Mayor, City of       Market Street,       portal/
                                                        Baytown, P.O. Box    Baytown, TX 77522.   advanceSearch.
                                                        424, Baytown, TX
                                                        77522.
    Harris......................  Unincorporated       The Honorable        Harris County        https://             Jan. 28, 2019........       480287
                                   areas of Harris      Edward M. Emmett,    Permits Office,      msc.fema.gov/
                                   County (18-06-       Harris County        10555 Northwest      portal/
                                   0277P).              Judge, 1001          Freeway, Suite       advanceSearch.
                                                        Preston Street,      120, Houston, TX
                                                        Suite 911,           77092.
                                                        Houston, TX 77002.
    Harris......................  Unincorporated       The Honorable        Harris County        https://             Jan. 22, 2019........       480287
                                   areas of Harris      Edward M. Emmett,    Permits Office,      msc.fema.gov/
                                   County (18-06-       Harris County        10555 Northwest      portal/
                                   2955P).              Judge, 1001          Freeway, Suite       advanceSearch.
                                                        Preston Street,      120, Houston, TX
                                                        Suite 911,           77092.
                                                        Houston, TX 77002.
    Travis......................  City of              The Honorable        Development          https://             Feb. 11, 2019........       481028
                                   Pflugerville (18-    Victor Gonzales,     Services Center,     msc.fema.gov/
                                   06-0800P).           Mayor, City of       201-B East Pecan     portal/
                                                        Pflugerville, P.O.   Street,              advanceSearch.
                                                        Box 589,             Pflugerville, TX
                                                        Pflugerville, TX     78691.
                                                        78691.
    Travis......................  Unincorporated       The Honorable Sarah  Travis County        https://             Feb. 11, 2019........       481026
                                   areas of Travis      Eckhardt, Travis     Transportation and   msc.fema.gov/
                                   County (18-06-       County Judge, P.O.   Natural Resources    portal/
                                   0800P).              Box 1748, Austin,    Division, 700        advanceSearch.
                                                        TX 78767.            Lavaca Street,
                                                                             Suite 540, Austin,
                                                                             TX 78701.
Utah: Washington................  City of St. George   The Honorable        City Hall, 175 East  https://             Feb. 4, 2019.........       490177
                                   (18-08-0374P).       Jonathan T. Pike,    200 North St.,       msc.fema.gov/
                                                        Mayor, City of St.   George, UT 84770.    portal/
                                                        George, 175 East                          advanceSearch.
                                                        200 North St.,
                                                        George, UT 84770.
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

[FR Doc. 2018-25545 Filed 11-21-18; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 9110-12-P


[Federal Register: September 15, 2009 (Volume 74, Number 177)]
[Notices]
[Page 47300]
[DOCID:fr15se09-141]

=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

Sunshine Act Meeting

    Notice is hereby given, pursuant to the provisions of the
Government in the Sunshine Act, Public Law 94-409, that the Securities
and Exchange Commission will hold an Open Meeting on Thursday,
September 17, 2009, at 2:30 p.m., in the Multipurpose Room, Room L-006.
    The subject matter of the Open Meeting will be:

1. Nationally Recognized Statistical Rating Organizations (``NRSROs'')

A. Final Rule Amendments and Proposed Rule Amendments under the Credit
Rating Agency Reform Act of 2006

    The Commission will consider whether to adopt rules and propose
other rules that impose additional disclosure and conflict of interest
requirements on NRSROs in order to address concerns about the integrity
of the credit rating procedures and methodologies.

B. References to Nationally Recognized Statistical Rating Organization
Ratings in Commission Rules and Forms

    The Commission will consider whether to eliminate references to
credit ratings by NRSROs from certain rules and forms, and whether to
re-open the comment period to solicit further comment on elimination of
additional NRSRO references.

C. Credit Ratings and Rating Shopping Disclosure

    The Commission will consider whether to propose amendments to
Regulation S-K, and rules and forms under the Securities Act of 1933
(``Securities Act''), the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (``Exchange
Act'') and the Investment Company Act of 1940 (``Investment Company
Act'') to require disclosure regarding credit ratings that a registrant
uses in connection with a registered offering.

D. Rule 436(g)

    The Commission will consider whether to issue a concept release and
solicit comment on whether the Commission should propose to rescind
Rule 436(g) under the Securities Act, in light of the disclosure
regarding credit ratings being proposed in a companion release (see C
above).

2. Flash Orders: Proposed Amendment to Rule 602 of Regulation NMS

    The Commission will consider a recommendation to propose an
amendment to Rule 602 of Regulation NMS under the Exchange Act that
would eliminate an exception for the use of flash orders, as well as
other related issues. If adopted, the proposals would prohibit the
practice of displaying marketable flash orders.
    At times, changes in Commission priorities require alterations in
the scheduling of meeting items.
    For further information and to ascertain what, if any, matters have
been added, deleted or postponed, please contact: The Office of the
Secretary at<PHONE_NUMBER>.

    Dated: September 10, 2009.
Elizabeth M. Murphy,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. E9-22194 Filed 9-11-09; 11:15 am]

BILLING CODE 8010-01-P


[Federal Register: November 17, 2008 (Volume 73, Number 222)]
[Proposed Rules]
[Page 67820-67823]
[DOCID:fr17no08-31]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION

Federal Aviation Administration

14 CFR Part 39

[Docket No. FAA-2008-1216; Directorate Identifier 2008-NM-111-AD]
RIN 2120-AA64

Airworthiness Directives; Bombardier Model CL-600-1A11 (CL-600),
CL-600-2A12 (CL-601), and CL-600-2B16 (CL-601-3A, CL-601-3R, and CL-
604) Airplanes

AGENCY: Federal Aviation Administration (FAA), DOT.

ACTION: Notice of proposed rulemaking (NPRM).

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: We propose to adopt a new airworthiness directive (AD) for the
products listed above. This proposed AD results from mandatory
continuing airworthiness information (MCAI) originated by an aviation
authority of another country to identify and correct an unsafe
condition on an aviation product. The MCAI describes the unsafe
condition as:

    * * * [S]everal cases of wing anti-ice piccolo duct failure
reported on CL-600-2B19 (CRJ) aircraft. Although there have been no
failures reported on Challenger aircraft, similar ducts are
installed on the above Challenger models.
* * * * *
    Cracking of the wing anti-ice piccolo ducts could result in air
leakage, with an adverse effect on the anti-ice air distribution
pattern and a possible unannunciated insufficient heat condition. *
* *

The unsafe condition is anti-ice system air leakage with a possible
adverse effect on the anti-ice air distribution pattern and anti-ice
capability without annunciation to the flightcrew, and consequent
reduced controllability of the airplane. The proposed AD would require
actions that are intended to address the unsafe condition described in
the MCAI.

DATES: We must receive comments on this proposed AD by December 17,
2008.

ADDRESSES: You may send comments by any of the following methods:
     Federal eRulemaking Portal: Go to http://
www.regulations.gov. Follow the instructions for submitting comments.
     Fax:<PHONE_NUMBER>.
     Mail: U.S. Department of Transportation, Docket
Operations, M-30, West Building Ground Floor, Room W12-140, 1200 New
Jersey Avenue, SE., Washington, DC 20590.
     Hand Delivery: U.S. Department of Transportation, Docket
Operations, M-30, West Building Ground Floor, Room W12-40, 1200 New
Jersey Avenue, SE., Washington, DC, between 9 a.m. and 5 p.m., Monday
through Friday, except Federal holidays.

Examining the AD Docket

    You may examine the AD docket on the Internet at http://
www.regulations.gov; or in person at the Docket Operations office
between 9 a.m. and 5 p.m., Monday through Friday, except Federal
holidays. The AD docket contains this proposed AD, the regulatory
evaluation, any comments received, and other information. The street
address for the Docket Operations office (telephone<PHONE_NUMBER>) is
in the ADDRESSES section. Comments will be available in the AD docket
shortly after receipt.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Dan Parrillo, Aerospace Engineer,
Airframe and Propulsion Branch, ANE-171, FAA, New York Aircraft
Certification Office, 1600 Stewart Avenue, Suite 410, Westbury, New
York 11590; telephone<PHONE_NUMBER>; fax<PHONE_NUMBER>.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

Comments Invited

    We invite you to send any written relevant data, views, or
arguments about this proposed AD. Send your comments to an address
listed under the ADDRESSES section. Include ``Docket No. FAA-2008-1216;
Directorate Identifier 2008-NM-111-AD'' at the beginning of your
comments. We specifically invite comments on the overall regulatory,
economic, environmental, and energy aspects of this proposed AD. We
will consider all comments received by the closing date and may amend
this proposed AD based on those comments.
    We will post all comments we receive, without change, to http://
www.regulations.gov, including any personal information you provide. We
will also post a report summarizing each substantive verbal contact we
receive about this proposed AD.

Discussion

    Transport Canada Civil Aviation (TCCA), which is the aviation
authority for Canada, has issued Canadian Airworthiness Directive CF-
2008-18, dated May 9, 2008 (referred to after this as ``the MCAI''), to
correct an unsafe condition for the specified products. The MCAI
states:

    There have been several cases of wing anti-ice piccolo duct
failure reported on CL-600-2B19 (CRJ) aircraft. Although there have
been no failures reported on Challenger aircraft, similar ducts are
installed on the above Challenger models [CL-600-1A11, CL-600-2A12,
and CL-600-2B16].
    Upon investigation, it has been determined that ducts
manufactured since June 2000, and installed since 1 August 2000, are
susceptible to cracking due to the process used to drill the holes
in the ducts. These ducts were installed on CL-600-2B16 aircraft,
serial numbers 5469 through 5635 in production, but may also have
been installed as replacements on CL-600-1A11, CL-600-2A12 and other
CL-600-2B16 aircraft.
    Cracking of the wing anti-ice piccolo ducts could result in air
leakage, with an adverse effect on the anti-ice air distribution
pattern and a possible unannunciated insufficient heat condition. As
a result, the airplane flight manual (AFM) instructions have been
revised to provide proper annunciation of an insufficient heat
condition, utilizing existing messages and indications, with
instructions, to the pilot, to leave icing conditions if

sufficient heat cannot be achieved or maintained.
    This directive mandates the amendment of the AFM procedures, in
addition to checking the part numbers and serial numbers of the
installed wing anti-ice piccolo ducts and replacing them as
necessary.

The unsafe condition is anti-ice system air leakage with a possible
adverse effect on the anti-ice air distribution pattern and anti-ice
capability without annunciation to the flightcrew, and consequent
reduced controllability of the airplane. You may obtain further
information by examining the MCAI in the AD docket.

Relevant Service Information

    Bombardier has issued the service information listed in the
``Temporary Revisions (TRs)'' and ``Service Bulletins'' tables. The
actions described in this service information are intended to correct
the unsafe condition identified in the MCAI.

                                            Temporary Revisions (TRs)
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
            Canadair TR--                           To the--                              Date--
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
600/23...............................  Canadair Challenger Model CL-600-  August 16, 2006.
                                        1A11 Airplane Flight Manual
                                        (AFM).
600-1/19.............................  Canadair Challenger Model CL-600-  August 16, 2006.
                                        1A11 (Winglets) AFM.
601/14...............................  Canadair Challenger Model CL-600-  August 16, 2006.
                                        2A12 AFM, Product Support
                                        Publication (PSP) 601-1B-1.
601/15...............................  Canadair Challenger Model CL-600-  August 16, 2006.
                                        2A12 AFM, PSP 601-1A-1.
601/19...............................  Canadair Challenger Model CL-600-  August 16, 2006.
                                        2A12 AFM, PSP 601-1B.
601/26...............................  Canadair Challenger Model CL-600-  August 16, 2006.
                                        2B16 AFM, PSP 601A-1.
601/27...............................  Canadair Challenger Model CL-600-  August 16, 2006.
                                        2A12 AFM.
601/27...............................  Canadair Challenger Model CL-600-  August 16, 2006.
                                        2B16 AFM, PSP 601A-1-1.
604/20...............................  Canadair Challenger Model CL-604   April 17, 2006.
                                        AFM, PSP 604-1.
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

                                                Service Bulletins
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
      Bombardier Service Bulletin--              Revision level--                         Date--
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
600-0734.................................  Original....................  November 30, 2006.
601-0585.................................  Original....................  November 30, 2006.
604-30-003...............................  01..........................  January 21, 2008.
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

FAA's Determination and Requirements of This Proposed AD

    This product has been approved by the aviation authority of another
country, and is approved for operation in the United States. Pursuant
to our bilateral agreement with the State of Design Authority, we have
been notified of the unsafe condition described in the MCAI and service
information referenced above. We are proposing this AD because we
evaluated all pertinent information and determined an unsafe condition
exists and is likely to exist or develop on other products of the same
type design.

Differences Between This AD and the MCAI or Service Information

    We have reviewed the MCAI and related service information and, in
general, agree with their substance. But we might have found it
necessary to use different words from those in the MCAI to ensure the
AD is clear for U.S. operators and is enforceable. In making these
changes, we do not intend to differ substantively from the information
provided in the MCAI and related service information.
    We might also have proposed different actions in this AD from those
in the MCAI in order to follow FAA policies. Any such differences are
highlighted in a Note within the proposed AD.

Costs of Compliance

    Based on the service information, we estimate that this proposed AD
would affect about 108 products of U.S. registry. We also estimate that
it would take about 37 work-hours per product to comply with the basic
requirements of this proposed AD. The average labor rate is $80 per
work-hour. Based on these figures, we estimate the cost of the proposed
AD on U.S. operators to be $319,680, or $2,960 per product.

Authority for This Rulemaking

    Title 49 of the United States Code specifies the FAA's authority to
issue rules on aviation safety. Subtitle I, section 106, describes the
authority of the FAA Administrator. ``Subtitle VII: Aviation
Programs,'' describes in more detail the scope of the Agency's
authority.
    We are issuing this rulemaking under the authority described in
``Subtitle VII, Part A, Subpart III, Section 44701: General
requirements.'' Under that section, Congress charges the FAA with
promoting safe flight of civil aircraft in air commerce by prescribing
regulations for practices, methods, and procedures the Administrator
finds necessary for safety in air commerce. This regulation is within
the scope of that authority because it addresses an unsafe condition
that is likely to exist or develop on products identified in this
rulemaking action.

Regulatory Findings

    We determined that this proposed AD would not have federalism
implications under Executive Order 13132. This proposed AD would not
have a substantial direct effect on the States, on the relationship
between the national Government and the States, or on the distribution
of power and responsibilities among the various levels of government.
    For the reasons discussed above, I certify this proposed
regulation:
    1. Is not a ``significant regulatory action'' under Executive Order
12866;
    2. Is not a ``significant rule'' under the DOT Regulatory Policies
and Procedures (44 FR 11034, February 26, 1979); and
    3. Will not have a significant economic impact, positive or
negative, on a substantial number of small entities under the criteria
of the Regulatory Flexibility Act.
    We prepared a regulatory evaluation of the estimated costs to
comply with this proposed AD and placed it in the AD docket.

List of Subjects in 14 CFR Part 39

    Air transportation, Aircraft, Aviation safety, Incorporation by
reference, Safety.

The Proposed Amendment

    Accordingly, under the authority delegated to me by the
Administrator, the FAA proposes to amend 14 CFR part 39 as follows:

PART 39--AIRWORTHINESS DIRECTIVES

    1. The authority citation for part 39 continues to read as follows:

    Authority: 49 U.S.C. 106(g), 40113, 44701.

Sec.  39.13  [Amended]

    2. The FAA amends Sec.  39.13 by adding the following new AD:

Bombardier, Inc. (Formerly Canadair): Docket No. FAA-2008-1216;
Directorate Identifier 2008-NM-111-AD.

Comments Due Date

    (a) We must receive comments by December 17, 2008.

Affected ADs

    (b) None.

Applicability

    (c) This AD applies to the airplanes identified in Table 1,
paragraphs (c)(1), (c)(2), (c)(3), and (c)(4) of this AD,
certificated in any category.

                 Table 1--Airplanes Affected by This AD
------------------------------------------------------------------------
             Bombardier model                        Serial Nos.
------------------------------------------------------------------------
(1) CL-600-1A11 (CL-600) airplanes........  1004 through 1085 inclusive.
(2) CL-600-2A12 (CL-601) airplanes........  3001 through 3066 inclusive.
(3) CL-600-2B16 (CL-601-3A, CL-601-3R, &    5001 through 5194 inclusive.
 CL-604) airplanes.
(4) CL-600-2B16 (CL-601-3A, CL-601-3R, &    5301 through 5635 inclusive.
 CL-604) airplanes.
------------------------------------------------------------------------

Subject

    (d) Air Transport Association (ATA) of America Code 30: Ice and
Rain Protection.

Reason

    (e) The mandatory continuing airworthiness information (MCAI)
states:

    There have been several cases of wing anti-ice piccolo duct
failure reported on CL-600-2B19 (CRJ) aircraft. Although there have
been no failures reported on Challenger aircraft, similar ducts are
installed on the above Challenger models.
    Upon investigation, it has been determined that ducts
manufactured since June 2000, and installed since 1 August 2000, are
susceptible to cracking due to the process used to drill the holes
in the ducts. These ducts were installed on CL-600-2B16 aircraft,
serial numbers 5469 through 5635 in production, but may also have
been installed as replacements on CL-600-1A11, CL-600-2A12 and other
CL-600-2B16 aircraft.
    Cracking of the wing anti-ice piccolo ducts could result in air
leakage, with an adverse effect on the anti-ice air distribution
pattern and a possible unannunciated insufficient heat condition. As
a result, the airplane flight manual (AFM) instructions have been
revised to provide proper annunciation of an insufficient heat
condition, utilizing existing messages and indications, with
instructions, to the pilot, to leave icing conditions if sufficient
heat cannot be achieved or maintained.
    This directive mandates the amendment of the AFM procedures, in
addition to checking the part numbers and serial numbers of the
installed wing anti-ice piccolo ducts and replacing them as
necessary.

The unsafe condition is anti-ice system air leakage with a possible
adverse effect on the anti-ice air distribution pattern and anti-ice
capability without annunciation to the flightcrew, and consequent
reduced controllability of the airplane.

Actions and Compliance

    (f) Unless already done, do the following actions.
    (1) For airplanes identified in paragraphs (c)(1), (c)(2),
(c)(3), and (c)(4) of this AD: Within 30 days after the effective
date of this AD, revise the Normal and Abnormal Procedures sections
of the Airplane Flight Manual (AFM) by inserting a copy of the
applicable Temporary Revision (TR) listed in Table 2 of this AD.
When the information in the applicable TR is included in the general
revisions of the AFM, the general revisions may be inserted in the
AFM and the TR may be removed.

                                          Table 2--Temporary Revisions
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
            Canadair TR--                           To the--                              Date--
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
(i) 600/23...........................  Canadair Challenger Model CL-600-  August 16, 2006.
                                        1A11 Airplane Flight Manual
                                        (AFM).
(ii) 600-1/19........................  Canadair Challenger Model CL-600-  August 16, 2006.
                                        1A11 (Winglets) AFM.
(iii) 601/14.........................  Canadair Challenger Model CL-600-  August 16, 2006.
                                        2A12 AFM, Product Support
                                        Publication (PSP) 601-1B-1.
(iv) 601/15..........................  Canadair Challenger Model CL-600-  August 16, 2006.
                                        2A12 AFM, PSP 601-1A-1.
(v) 601/19...........................  Canadair Challenger Model CL-600-  August 16, 2006.
                                        2A12 AFM, PSP 601-1B.
(vi) 601/26..........................  Canadair Challenger Model CL-600-  August 16, 2006.
                                        2B16 AFM, PSP 601A-1.
(vii) 601/27.........................  Canadair Challenger Model CL-600-  August 16, 2006.
                                        2A12 AFM.
(viii) 601/27........................  Canadair Challenger Model CL-600-  August 16, 2006.
                                        2B16 AFM, PSP 601A-1-1.
(ix) 604/20..........................  Canadair Challenger Model CL-604   April 17, 2006.
                                        AFM, PSP 604-1.
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

    (2) For airplanes identified in paragraphs (c)(1), (c)(2), and
(c)(3) of this AD, and for Model CL-600-2B16 (CL-601-3A, CL-601-3R,
& CL-604) airplanes, serial numbers 5301 through 5468 inclusive:
Prior to the accumulation of 2,000 total flight hours, or within 60
months after the effective date of this AD, whichever occurs first,
review the airplane maintenance records to determine if any anti-ice
piccolo ducts or complete leading edge sections were replaced since
August 1, 2000.
    (3) For airplanes identified in paragraphs (c)(1), (c)(2), and
(c)(3) of this AD, and for Model CL-600-2B16 (CL-601-3A, CL-601-3R,
& CL-604) airplanes, serial numbers 5301 through 5468 inclusive: If,
during the action required by paragraph (f)(2) of this AD, it is
determined that any anti-ice piccolo duct has been replaced since
August 1, 2000, before further flight do a visual inspection to
determine if any affected serial number is installed as identified
in paragraph 2.C. of the applicable service bulletin identified in
Table 3 of this AD. A review of airplane maintenance records is
acceptable in lieu of this inspection if the serial number of the
duct can be conclusively determined from that review. If any
affected serial number is installed, before further flight replace
the piccolo duct with a serviceable piccolo duct that does not have
a serial number identified in paragraph 2.C. of the applicable
service bulletin identified in Table 3 of this AD. Do all actions in
accordance with the Accomplishment Instructions of the applicable
service bulletin listed in Table 3 of this AD.

                                           Table 3--Service Bulletins
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
                                           Bombardier
                Model--                      service           Revision level--                 Date--
                                           bulletin--
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
(i) CL-600-1A11 (CL-600) airplanes.....        600-0734  Original...................  November 30, 2006.
(ii) CL-600-2A12 (CL-601) airplanes....        601-0585  Original...................  November 30, 2006.
(iii) CL-600-2B16 (CL-601-3A, CL-601-          601-0585  Original...................  November 30, 2006.
 3R) airplanes.
(iv) CL-600-2B16 (CL-604) airplanes....      604-30-003  01.........................  January 21, 2008.
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

    (4) For Model CL-600-2B16 (CL-601-3A, CL-601-3R, & CL-604)
airplanes, serial numbers 5469 through 5635 inclusive: Prior to the
accumulation of 2,000 total flight hours, or within 60 months after
the effective date of this AD, whichever occurs first, do a visual
inspection of the anti-ice piccolo ducts to determine if any
affected serial number identified in paragraph 2.C. of the
Bombardier Service Bulletin 604-30-003, Revision 01, dated January
21, 2008 (``the service bulletin''), is installed. If any affected
serial number is installed, before further flight replace the
piccolo duct with a serviceable piccolo duct that does not have a
serial number identified in paragraph 2.C. of the service bulletin.
Do all actions in accordance with the Accomplishment Instructions of
the service bulletin.
    (5) As of the effective date of this AD, no person may install
on any airplane an anti-ice piccolo duct with a serial number
identified in paragraph 2.C. of the applicable service bulletin
identified in Table 3 of this AD.
    (6) Actions done before the effective date of this AD in
accordance with Bombardier Service Bulletin 604-30-003, dated
November 30, 2006, are acceptable for compliance with the
corresponding actions in this AD.

FAA AD Differences

    Note 1: This AD differs from the MCAI and/or service information
as follows: No differences.

Other FAA AD Provisions

    (g) The following provisions also apply to this AD:
    (1) Alternative Methods of Compliance (AMOCs): The Manager, New
York Aircraft Certification Office, FAA, has the authority to
approve AMOCs for this AD, if requested using the procedures found
in 14 CFR 39.19. Send information to ATTN: Dan Parrillo, Aerospace
Engineer, Airframe and Propulsion Branch, ANE-171, FAA, New York
Aircraft Certification Office, 1600 Stewart Avenue, Suite 410,
Westbury, New York 11590; telephone<PHONE_NUMBER>; fax (516) 794-
5531. Before using any approved AMOC on any airplane to which the
AMOC applies, notify your appropriate principal inspector (PI) in
the FAA Flight Standards District Office (FSDO), or lacking a PI,
your local FSDO.
    (2) Airworthy Product: For any requirement in this AD to obtain
corrective actions from a manufacturer or other source, use these
actions if they are FAA-approved. Corrective actions are considered
FAA-approved if they are approved by the State of Design Authority
(or their delegated agent). You are required to assure the product
is airworthy before it is returned to service.
    (3) Reporting Requirements: For any reporting requirement in
this AD, under the provisions of the Paperwork Reduction Act, the
Office of Management and Budget (OMB) has approved the information
collection requirements and has assigned OMB Control Number 2120-
0056.

Related Information

    (h) Refer to MCAI Canadian Airworthiness Directive CF-2008-18,
dated May 9, 2008, and the service information identified in Table 2
and Table 3 of this AD, for related information.

    Issued in Renton, Washington, on November 6, 2008.
Stephen P. Boyd,
Assistant Manager, Transport Airplane Directorate, Aircraft
Certification Service.
[FR Doc. E8-27162 Filed 11-14-08; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4910-13-P


[Federal Register Volume 77, Number 83 (Monday, April 30, 2012)]
[Notices]
[Pages 25521-25522]
[FR Doc No: 2012-10512]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

Sunshine Act Meeting

    Notice is hereby given, pursuant to the provisions of the
Government in the Sunshine Act, Public Law 94-409, that the Securities
and Exchange Commission will hold a Closed Meeting on Thursday, May 3,
2012 at 2:00 p.m.
    Commissioners, Counsel to the Commissioners, the Secretary to the
Commission, and recording secretaries will attend the Closed Meeting.
Certain staff members who have an interest in the matters also may be
present.
    The General Counsel of the Commission, or his designee, has
certified that, in his opinion, one or more of the exemptions set forth
in 5 U.S.C. 552b(c)(3), (5), (7), 9(B) and (10) and 17 CFR
200.402(a)(3), (5), (7), 9(ii) and (10), permit consideration of the
scheduled matters at the Closed Meeting.
    Commissioner Paredes, as duty officer, voted to consider the items
listed for the Closed Meeting in a closed session.
    The subject matter of the Closed Meeting scheduled for Thursday,
May 3, 2012 will be:

Institution and settlement of injunctive actions;
Institution and settlement of administrative proceedings; and
Other matters relating to enforcement proceedings.

    At times, changes in Commission priorities require alterations in
the scheduling of meeting items.
    For further information and to ascertain what, if any, matters have
been added, deleted or postponed, please

contact: The Office of the Secretary at<PHONE_NUMBER>.

    Dated: April 26, 2012
Elizabeth M. Murphy,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2012-10512 Filed 4-26-12; 4:15 pm]
BILLING CODE 8011-01-P


[Federal Register Volume 84, Number 75 (Thursday, April 18, 2019)]
[Notices]
[Page 16316]
[FR Doc No: 2019-07771]

=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION

Federal Aviation Administration

[Docket No. FAA-2019-0287]

Agency Information Collection Activities: Requests for Comments;
Clearance of Renewed Approval of Information Collection: Certificated
Training Centers--Simulator Rule

AGENCY: Federal Aviation Administration (FAA), DOT.

ACTION: Notice and request for comments.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: In accordance with the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995, FAA
invites public comments about our intention to request the Office of
Management and Budget (OMB) approval to renew an information
collection. The collection involves Certificated Training Centers.
Operators pay Certificated Training Centers to provide training to
their employees, typically pilots, on different types of equipment if
training is not done in house. The information to be collected is
necessary because it allows aviation safety inspectors (operations) to
review and to provide surveillance to training centers to ensure
compliance with airman training, testing, and certification
requirements specified in other parts of the regulations. If the
information were not collected, inspectors would not be able to
determine if airmen who are clients are being trained, checked or
tested to meet the safety standards established in other parts of the
regulations. To date, FAA inspectors have used the information
collected to determine and assess regulatory compliance during routine
program surveillance.

DATES: Written comments should be submitted by June 17, 2019.

ADDRESSES: Please send written comments:
    By Electronic Docket: www.regulations.gov (Enter docket number into
search field).
    By mail: Sandra Ray, Federal Aviation Administration, Policy
Integration Branch AFS-270, 1187 Thorn Run Road, Suite 200, Coraopolis,
PA 15108.
    By fax:<PHONE_NUMBER>.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Sandra Ray at<PHONE_NUMBER>, or by
email at: [email protected].

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
    Public Comments Invited: You are asked to comment on any aspect of
this information collection, including (a) Whether the proposed
collection of information is necessary for FAA's performance; (b) the
accuracy of the estimated burden; (c) ways for FAA to enhance the
quality, utility and clarity of the information collection; and (d)
ways that the burden could be minimized without reducing the quality of
the collected information. The agency will summarize and/or include
your comments in the request for OMB's clearance of this information
collection.
    OMB Control Number: 2120-0570.
    Title: Certificated Training Centers--Simulator Rule.
    Form Numbers: There are no forms associated with this collection.
    Type of Review: Renewal of an Information Collection.
    Background: Part 142 Flight Schools are subject to several
collection requirements. 14 CFR part 142 is one of several Federal
Regulation parts that implement the Public Law. Section 142.11 provides
that application for a training center certificate and training
specifications shall be made in a form and manner prescribed by the
Administrator, shall provide specific information about each
management, instructor position, and evaluator position, and contain
certain other administrative information.
    Section 142.37 provides that application for approval of training
programs must be in a form and manner acceptable to the Administrator,
and must provide specific information about curriculum and courses of
the training program.
    Chapter 447, Section 44701 of Title 49, United States Code,
provides, in pertinent part, that the Administrator may find, after
investigation, that a person found to possess proper qualifications for
a position as an airman may be issued such certificate. That
certificate shall contain such terms, conditions, and limitations as to
duration thereof, as well as periodic or special examinations, and
other matters as the Administrator may determine to be necessary to
assure safety in air commerce.
    Section 142.73 requires that training centers maintain records for
a period of one year to show trainee qualifications for training,
testing, or checking, training attempts, training checking, and testing
results, and for one year following termination of employment the
qualification of instructors and evaluators providing those services.
    The respondents may be the Part 142 schools, Part 121 or 135 air
carriers who utilize these schools or new applicants seeking Part 142
certification. The information may be collected in electronic forms. No
specific forms are required. Information reporting may be done in
accordance with the individual FAA office.
    Respondents: 82,239 (Includes Part 142 schools, Part 121 and 135
carriers and new certifications).
    Frequency: On occasion.
    Estimated Average Burden per Response: 96 Hours.
    Estimated Total Annual Burden: 83,767 Hours.

    Issued in Washington, DC, on April 12, 2019.
Sandra L. Ray,
Aviation Safety Inspector, FAA, Policy Integration Branch, AFS-270.
[FR Doc. 2019-07771 Filed 4-17-19; 8:45 am]
 BILLING CODE 4910-13-P


BEFORE THE

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION

WASHINGTON, D.C.

Joint Applications of		)

		)

DELTA AIR LINES, INC.,		)

ATLANTIC SOUTHEAST AIRLINES, INC. and	)

COMAIR, INC.		)

		)

and		)	Docket OST-2000-6939

		)

SOCIETÉ AIR FRANCE		)

for statements of authorization		)

pursuant to 14 C.F.R. Part 212		)

(United States-France blanket codesharing)		)

30-DAY NOTICE

Communications with respect to this document should be sent to:

Michael F. Goldman			D. Scott Yohe

SILVERBERG, GOLDMAN		Senior Vice President - Government Affairs

  & BIKOFF, L.L.P.			DELTA AIR LINES, INC.

1101 30th Street, N.W., Suite 120	1275 K Street, N.W.

Washington, D.C. 20007			Washington, D.C. 20005

(202) 944-3305<PHONE_NUMBER>

Counsel for 					John Varley, Assistant General Counsel

SOCIETÉ AIR FRANCE			James Coblin, Attorney

						DELTA AIR LINES, INC.

						Law Department #981

						1030 Delta Boulevard

						Atlanta, GA 30320

<PHONE_NUMBER>

						Robert E. Cohn

						Alexander Van der Bellen

						SHAW PITTMAN LLP

						2300 N. Street, N.W.

						Washington, D.C. 20037-1128

<PHONE_NUMBER>

						Counsel for

						DELTA AIR LINES, INC.

				ATLANTIC SOUTHEAST AIRLINES, INC.

May 28, 2002				COMAIR, INC.BEFORE THE

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION

WASHINGTON, D.C.

May 28, 2002

Joint Applications of		)

		)

DELTA AIR LINES, INC.,		)

ATLANTIC SOUTHEAST AIRLINES, INC. and	)

COMAIR, INC.		)

		)

and		)	Docket OST-2000-6939

		)

SOCIETÉ AIR FRANCE		)

for statements of authorization		)

pursuant to 14 C.F.R. Part 212		)

(United States-France blanket codesharing)		)

30-DAY NOTICE

Pursuant to the blanket statements of authorization granted to Delta and Air France, the carriers hereby submit this 30-day notice of additional codesharing.

Beginning on or about June 27, 2002, Air France plans to display its “AF” designator code on Delta-operated flights between Paris and Mumbai, India.

Respectfully submitted,

/s/						  /s/

Michael F. Goldman	Robert E. Cohn

SILVERBERG, GOLDMAN	Alexander Van der Bellen

  & BIKOFF, L.L.P.	SHAW PITTMAN LLP

1101 30th Street, N.W., Suite 120	2300 N Street, N.W.

Washington, D.C. 20007	Washington, D.C. 20037-1128

(202) 944-3305<PHONE_NUMBER>

Counsel for	Counsel for

SOCIETÉ AIR FRANCE	DELTA AIR LINES, INC.

	ATLANTIC SOUTHEAST AIRLINES, INC.

	COMAIR, INC.

Footnote continued from previous page

Footnote continued on next page

30 Day Notice

Page   PAGE  2