			  UNITED STATES OF AMERICA

		        DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION

			  OFFICE OF THE SECRETARY

			          WASHINGTON, D.C.

Issued by the Department of Transportation on July 22 2005

NOTICE OF ACTION TAKEN -- DOCKET OST-2003-15485

________________________________________________________________________
________________________________________________________

This serves as notice to the public of the action described below, taken
by the Department official indicated (no additional confirming order
will be issued in this matter).

Applicant:  Lufthansa CityLine GmbH					Date Filed:  July 11, 2005

Relief requested:  Renew exemption from 49 U.S.C. § 40109 to permit
Lufthansa CityLine to conduct, for a period of two years, scheduled
foreign air transportation of persons, property and mail by displaying
the code of United Air Lines on flights operated by Lufthansa CityLine
wholly within Germany, and, in addition, between points in Germany and
points in third countries.

If renewal, date and citation of last action:  July 15, 2003, in this
docket

Applicant representative:  David Heffernan<PHONE_NUMBER>

DOT Analyst:  Shelita A. Smith<PHONE_NUMBER>

Responsive pleadings:  None filed

DISPOSITION

Action:  Approved							Action date:  July 22, 2005

Effective dates of exemption authority granted:  July 22, 2005 – July
22, 2007

Basis for approval (bilateral agreement/reciprocity):  The United
States-Germany Air Transport Agreement, as amended.

Except to the extent exempted/waived, this authority is subject to the
terms, conditions, and limitations indicated:

   X   Standard exemption conditions (attached)                Foreign
air carrier permit   (Order            )

    X    Code-share conditions previously imposed on Lufthansa CityLine
in this docket

Special conditions/Partial grant/Denial basis/Remarks:

Action taken by:  Paul L. Gretch, Director

		   Office of International Aviation

________________________________________________________________________
________________________________________________________

Under authority assigned by the Department in its regulations, 14 CFR
Part 385, we found that (1) the applicant is qualified to perform the
proposed operations; (2) our action was consistent with Department
policy; (3) grant of the authority was consistent with the public
interest; and (4) grant of the authority would not constitute a major
regulatory action under the Energy Policy and Conservation Act of 1975.
To the extent not granted/deferred/dismissed, we denied

all requests in the referenced Docket.  We may amend, modify, or revoke
the authority granted in this Notice at any time without hearing at our
discretion.

Persons entitled to petition the Department for review of the action set
forth in this Notice under the Department’s regulations, 14 CFR §
385.30, may file their petitions within seven (7) days after the date of
issuance of this Notice.  This action was effective when taken, and the
filing of a petition for review will not alter such effectiveness.

An electronic version of this document is available on the World Wide
Web at:

  HYPERLINK "http://dms.dot.gov//reports/reports_aviation.asp"
http://dms.dot.gov//reports/reports_aviation.asp

Foreign Carrier Exemption Conditions

In the conduct of the operations authorized, the foreign carrier
applicant(s) shall:

(1)  Not conduct any operations unless it holds a currently effective
authorization from its homeland for such operations, and it has filed a
copy of such authorization with the Department;

(2)  Comply with all applicable requirements of the Federal Aviation
Administration, including, but not limited to, 14 CFR Parts 129, 91, and
36, and with all applicable U.S. Government requirements concerning
security, including, but not limited to, 49 CFR Part 1546 or 1550, as
applicable.  To assure compliance with all applicable U.S. Government
requirements concerning security, the holder shall, before commencing
any new service (including charter flights) from a foreign airport that
would be the holder’s last point of departure for the United States,
contact its International Principal Security Inspector (IPSI) to advise
the IPSI of its plans and to find out whether the Transportation
Security Administration has determined that security is adequate to
allow such airport(s) to be served;

(3)  Comply with the requirements for minimum insurance coverage
contained in 14 CFR Part 205, and, prior to the commencement of any
operations under this authority, file evidence of such coverage, in the
form of a completed OST Form 6411, with the Federal Aviation
Administration’s Program Management Branch (AFS-260), Flight Standards
Service (any changes to, or termination of, insurance also shall be
filed with that office);

(4)  Not operate aircraft under this authority unless it complies with
operational safety requirements at least equivalent to Annex 6 of the
Chicago Convention;

(5)  Conform to the airworthiness and airman competency requirements of
its Government for international air services;

(6)  Except as specifically exempted or otherwise provided for in a
Department Order, comply with the requirements of 14 CFR Part 203,
concerning waiver of Warsaw Convention liability limits and defenses;

(7)  Agree that operations under this authority constitute a waiver of
sovereign immunity, for the purposes of 28 U.S.C. 1605(a), but only with
respect to those actions or proceedings instituted against it in any
court or other tribunal in the United States that are: (a)  based on its
operations in international air transportation that, according to the
contract of carriage, include a point in the United States as a point of
origin, point of destination, or agreed stopping place, or for which the
contract of carriage was purchased in the United States; or (b)  based
on a claim under any international agreement or treaty cognizable in any
court or other tribunal of the United States.  In this condition, the
term "international air transportation" means "international
transportation" as defined by the Warsaw Convention, except that all
States shall be considered to be High Contracting Parties for the
purpose of this definition;

(8)  Except as specifically authorized by the Department, originate or
terminate all flights to/from the United States in its homeland;

(9)  Comply with the requirements of 14 CFR Part 217, concerning the
reporting of scheduled, nonscheduled, and charter data;

(10) If charter operations are authorized, except as otherwise provided
in the applicable aviation agreement, comply with the Department's rules
governing charters (including 14 CFR Parts 212 and 380); and

(11) Comply with such other reasonable terms, conditions, and
limitations required by the public interest as may be prescribed by the
Department, with all applicable orders or regulations of other U.S.
agencies and courts, and with all applicable laws of the United States.

This authority shall not be effective during any period when the holder
is not in compliance with the conditions imposed above.  Moreover, this
authority cannot be sold or otherwise transferred without explicit
Department approval under Title 49 of the U.S. Code.

05/2004


[Federal Register Volume 87, Number 189 (Friday, September 30, 2022)]
[Notices]
[Page 59413]
[FR Doc No: 2022-21239]

=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY

[EPA-HQ-OLEM-2018-0391, FRL-10267-01-OMS]

Information Collection Request Submitted to OMB for Review and
Approval; Comment Request; Ground-Water Monitoring Requirements
(Renewal)

AGENCY: Environmental Protection Agency (EPA).

ACTION: Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) has submitted an
information collection request (ICR), Facility Ground-Water Monitoring
Requirements (EPA ICR Number 0959.17, OMB Control Number 2050-0033) to
the Office of Management and Budget (OMB) for review and approval in
accordance with the Paperwork Reduction Act. This is a proposed
extension of the ICR, which is currently approved through November 30,
2022. Public comments were previously requested via the Federal
Register on March 23, 2022 during a 60-day comment period. This notice
allows for an additional 30 days for public comments. A fuller
description of the ICR is given below, including its estimated burden
and cost to the public. An agency may not conduct or sponsor and a
person is not required to respond to a collection of information unless
it displays a currently valid OMB control number.

DATES: Additional comments may be submitted on or before October 31,
2022.

ADDRESSES: Submit your comments, referencing Docket ID No. EPA-HQ-OLEM-
2018-0391, online using www.regulations.gov (our preferred method), or
by mail to: RCRA Docket (2822T), U.S. Environmental Protection Agency,
1200 Pennsylvania Avenue NW, Washington, DC 20460. The EPA's policy is
that all comments received will be included in the public docket
without change, including any personal information provided, unless the
comment includes profanity, threats, information claimed to be
Confidential Business Information (CBI), or other information whose
disclosure is restricted by statute.
    Submit written comments and recommendations to OMB for the proposed
information collection within 30 days of publication of this notice to
www.reginfo.gov/public/do/PRAMain. Find this particular information
collection by selecting ``Currently under 30-day Review--Open for
Public Comments'' or by using the search function.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Peggy Vyas, Environmental Protection
Agency, 1200 Pennsylvania Ave. NW, Washington, DC 20460; telephone
number:<PHONE_NUMBER>; fax number: email address: [email protected].

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Supporting documents, which explain in
detail the information that the EPA will be collecting, are available
in the public docket for this ICR. The docket can be viewed online at
www.regulations.gov. Materials can also be viewed at the Reading Room
located at the EPA Docket Center, WJC West Building, Room 3334, 1301
Constitution Avenue NW, Washington, DC 20004. The Docket Center's hours
of operations are 8:30 a.m.-4:30 p.m., Monday-Friday (except Federal
Holidays). The telephone number for the Docket Center is<PHONE_NUMBER>.
    Abstract: Subtitle C of the Resource Conservation and Recovery Act
(RCRA) creates a comprehensive program for the safe management of
hazardous waste. Section 3004 of RCRA requires owners and operators of
facilities that treat, store, or dispose of hazardous waste to comply
with standards established by EPA that are to protect the environment.
Section 3005 provides for implementation of these standards under
permits issued to owners and operators by EPA or authorized States.
Section 3005 also allows owners and operators of facilities in
existence when the regulations came into effect to comply with
applicable notice requirements to operate until a permit is issued or
denied. This statutory authorization to operate prior to permit
determination is commonly known as ``interim status.'' Owners and
operators of interim status facilities also must comply with standards
set under Section 3004.
    This ICR examines the ground-water monitoring standards for
permitted and interim status facilities at 40 CFR parts 264 and 265, as
specified. The ground-water monitoring requirements for regulated units
follow a tiered approach whereby releases of hazardous contaminants are
first detected (detection monitoring), then confirmed (compliance
monitoring), and if necessary, are required to be cleaned up
(corrective action). Each of these tiers requires collection and
analysis of ground-water samples. Owners or operators that conduct
ground-water monitoring are required to report information to the
oversight agencies on releases of contaminants and to maintain records
of ground-water monitoring data at their facilities. The goal of the
ground-water monitoring program is to prevent and quickly detect
releases of hazardous contaminants to groundwater, and to establish a
program whereby any contamination is expeditiously cleaned up as
necessary to protect human health and environment.
    Form Numbers: None.
    Respondents/affected entities: Business or other for-profit; and
State, Local, or Tribal Governments.
    Respondent's obligation to respond: Mandatory (RCRA Sections 3004
and 3005).
    Estimated number of respondents: 774.
    Frequency of response: Quarterly, semi-annually, and annually.
    Total estimated burden: 100,701 hours per year. Burden is defined
at 5 CFR 1320.03(b).
    Total estimated cost: $22,470,710 (per year), which includes
$15,430,083 annualized capital or operation & maintenance costs.
    Changes in the Estimates: There is a decrease of 4,160 hours in the
total estimated respondent burden compared with the ICR currently
approved by OMB. This decrease is due to a decrease in the respondent
universe.

Courtney Kerwin,
Director, Regulatory Support Division.
[FR Doc. 2022-21239 Filed 9-29-22; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6560-50-P


[Federal Register Volume 84, Number 41 (Friday, March 1, 2019)]
[Notices]
[Pages 7089-7090]
[FR Doc No: 2019-03647]

=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY

Coast Guard

[Docket No. USCG-2019-0040]

Information Collection Request to Office of Management and
Budget; OMB Control Number: 1625-0112

AGENCY: Coast Guard, DHS.

ACTION: Sixty-day notice requesting comments.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: In compliance with the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995, the
U.S. Coast Guard intends to submit an Information Collection Request
(ICR) to the Office of Management and Budget (OMB), Office of
Information and Regulatory Affairs (OIRA), requesting an extension of
its approval for the following collection of information: 1625-0112,
Enhanced Maritime Domain Awareness via Electronic Transmission of
Vessel Transit Data; without change. Our ICR describes the information
we seek to collect from the public. Before submitting this ICR to OIRA,
the Coast Guard is inviting comments as described below.

DATES: Comments must reach the Coast Guard on or before April 30, 2019.

ADDRESSES: You may submit comments identified by Coast Guard docket
number [USCG-2019-0040] to the Coast Guard using the Federal
eRulemaking Portal at http://www.regulations.gov. See the ``Public
participation and request for comments'' portion of the SUPPLEMENTARY
INFORMATION section for further instructions on submitting comments.
    A copy of the ICR is available through the docket on the internet
at http://www.regulations.gov. Additionally, copies are available from:
COMMANDANT (CG-612), ATTN: PAPERWORK REDUCTION ACT MANAGER, U.S. COAST
GUARD, 2703 MARTIN LUTHER KING JR AVE SE, STOP 7710, WASHINGTON, DC
20593-7710.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Contact Mr. Anthony Smith, Office of
Information Management, telephone<PHONE_NUMBER>, or fax<PHONE_NUMBER>,
for questions on these documents.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

Public Participation and Request for Comments

    This notice relies on the authority of the Paperwork Reduction Act
of 1995; 44 U.S.C. Chapter 35, as amended. An ICR is an application to
OIRA seeking the approval, extension, or renewal of a Coast Guard
collection of information (Collection). The ICR contains information
describing the Collection's purpose, the Collection's likely burden on
the affected public, an explanation of the necessity of the Collection,
and other important information describing the Collection. There is one
ICR for each Collection.
    The Coast Guard invites comments on whether this ICR should be
granted based on the Collection being necessary for the proper
performance of Departmental functions. In particular, the Coast Guard
would appreciate comments addressing: (1) The practical utility of the
Collection; (2) the accuracy of the estimated burden of the Collection;
(3) ways to enhance the quality, utility, and clarity of information
subject to the Collection; and (4) ways to minimize the burden of the
Collection on respondents, including the use of automated collection
techniques or other forms of information technology. Consistent with
the requirements of Executive Order 13771, Reducing Regulation and
Controlling Regulatory Costs, and Executive Order 13777, Enforcing the
Regulatory Reform Agenda, the Coast Guard is also requesting comments
on the extent to which this request for information could be modified
to reduce the burden on respondents. In response to your comments, we
may revise this ICR or decide not to seek an extension of approval for
the Collection. We will consider all comments and material received
during the comment period.
    We encourage you to respond to this request by submitting comments
and related materials. Comments must contain the OMB Control Number of
the ICR and the docket number of this request, [USCG-2019-0040], and
must be received by April 30, 2019.

Submitting Comments

    We encourage you to submit comments through the Federal eRulemaking
Portal at http://www.regulations.gov. If your material cannot be
submitted using http://www.regulations.gov, contact the person in the
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT section of this document for alternate
instructions. Documents mentioned in this notice, and all public
comments, are in our online docket at http://www.regulations.gov and
can be viewed by following that website's instructions. Additionally,
if you go to the online docket and sign up for email alerts, you will
be notified when comments are posted.
    We accept anonymous comments. All comments received will be posted
without change to http://www.regulations.gov and will include

any personal information you have provided. For more about privacy and
the docket, you may review a Privacy Act notice regarding the Federal
Docket Management System in the March 24, 2005, issue of the Federal
Register (70 FR 15086).

Information Collection Request

    Title: Enhanced Maritime Domain Awareness via Electronic
Transmission of Vessel Transit Data.
    OMB Control Number: 1625-0112.
    Summary: The Coast Guard collects, stores, and analyzes data
transmitted by Long Range Identification and Tracking (LRIT) and
Automatic Identification System (AIS) to enhance maritime domain
awareness (MDA). Awareness and threat knowledge are critical for
securing the maritime domain and the key to preventing adverse events.
Data is also used for marine safety and environmental protection
purposes.
    Need: To ensure port safety and security and to ensure the
uninterrupted flow of commerce.
    Forms: None.
    Respondents: Owners or operators of certain vessels.
    Frequency: On occasion.
    Hour Burden Estimate: The estimated burden has increased from
47,245 hours to 52,728 hours a year due to an increase in the estimated
annual number of responses.

    Authority: The Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995; 44 U.S.C.
Chapter 35, as amended.

    Dated: February 21, 2019.
James D. Roppel,
U.S. Coast Guard, Chief, Office of Information Management.
[FR Doc. 2019-03647 Filed 2-28-19; 8:45 am]
 BILLING CODE 9110-04-P


From:
Jones, DonnaLee<EMAIL_ADDRESS>Sent:
Wednesday, June 29, 2022 11:02 AM
To:
Scheetz, Jonelle S<EMAIL_ADDRESS>Cc:
mahammond<EMAIL_ADDRESS>Fernandez, Cristina<EMAIL_ADDRESS><EMAIL_ADDRESS>French, Chuck<EMAIL_ADDRESS>Coke ICR2<EMAIL_ADDRESS>mahammond<EMAIL_ADDRESS>Fernandez, Cristina<EMAIL_ADDRESS><EMAIL_ADDRESS>French, Chuck<EMAIL_ADDRESS>Coke ICR2<EMAIL_ADDRESS>Subject:
CAA section 114 request for Coke Ovens RTR - email for U.S. Steel

Hello Ms. Scheetz,

I hope this email finds you well. Attached you'll find a Clean Air Act (CAA) Section 114 information request signed on June 28, 2022, that requests information from United States Steel Corp.'s Clairton, PA coke oven battery facility. Please read the letter carefully and respond to this email acknowledging your receipt of the letter. Along with the letter I have attached the following files:

-- Enclosures 1&2 as PDF files
-- Enclosures #3 through #9 as a combined PDF file (these are standard enclosures we include with all ICRs)
-- 2 Excel files to use to submit data to Enclosure 1
-- 3 Excel files to use to submit data to Enclosure 2

Please let me know if you have any questions about this request.

Thank you in advance for your efforts on this CAA section 114 request.

Donna Lee Jones, Ph.D.
Senior Technical Advisor, Metals Sector
U. S. Environmental Protection Agency
Office of Air Quality Planning and Standards
Sector Policies and Programs Division / Metals & Inorganic Chemicals Group (D243-02)
Research Triangle Park, NC  27711  Tele:<PHONE_NUMBER>  Fax<PHONE_NUMBER>
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
"Reasonableness never fails to be appreciated."  - anon.

Pronouns - She/Her/Hers
Salutation - Dr./Ms.

<< 114_Letter_CokeOvens-06-28-22-USSteel.pdf >>
<< Encl-1-114-Coke RTR-FINAL-06-29-22.pdf >>
<< Encl-2-114-Coke RTR-FINAL-06-29-22.pdf >>
<< Encl-3-through-9-114-Coke-RTR-FINAL-06-29-22.pdf >>
<< ANSWER-Coke-Enc1-Questionnaire ICR-2016&2022-USSteel.xlsx >>
<< ANSWER-COMS-Coke_Enc1_Operations_1-Minute_2-weeks-Company_Facility.csv >>
<< ANSWER-Coke-Enc2-Emission-Test-Data_Company-Facility.xlsx >>
<< ANSWER-FUGITIVE-Coke Enc2_Test Results_Company_Facility.xlsx >>
<< ANSWER-DOOR-LEAKS_Coke-Enc2-Method303_Company_Facility.xlsx >>


[Federal Register: February 27, 2008 (Volume 73, Number 39)]
[Notices]
[Page 10436-10438]
[DOCID:fr27fe08-45]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY

[EPA-HQ-OPP-2008-0129; FRL-8353-7]

Sulfometuron Methyl Risk Assessments; Notice of Availability

AGENCY: Environmental Protection Agency (EPA).

ACTION: Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: This notice announces the availability of EPA's risk
assessments, and related documents for the pesticide sulfometuron
methyl, and opens a public comment period on these documents (Phase 3
of 4-Phase Process). The public is encouraged to suggest risk
management ideas or proposals to address the risks identified. EPA is
developing a Reregistration Eligibility Decision (RED) for sulfometuron
methyl through a modified, 4-Phase public participation process that
the Agency uses to involve the public in developing pesticide
reregistration decisions. Through this program, EPA is ensuring that
all pesticides meet current health and safety standards.

DATES: Comments must be received on or before April 28, 2008.

ADDRESSES: Submit your comments, identified by docket identification
(ID) number EPA-HQ-OPP-2008-0129, by one of the following methods:
     Federal eRulemaking Portal: http://www.regulations.gov.
Follow the on-line instructions for submitting comments.
     Mail: Office of Pesticide Programs (OPP) Regulatory Public
Docket (7502P), Environmental Protection Agency, 1200 Pennsylvania
Ave., NW., Washington, DC 20460-0001.
     Delivery: OPP Regulatory Public Docket (7502P),
Environmental Protection Agency, Rm. S-4400, One Potomac Yard (South
Bldg.), 2777 S. Crystal Dr., Arlington, VA. Deliveries are only
accepted during the Docket's normal hours of operation (8:30 a.m. to 4
p.m., Monday through Friday, excluding legal holidays). Special
arrangements should be made for deliveries of boxed information. The
Docket Facility telephone number is<PHONE_NUMBER>.
    Instructions: Direct your comments to docket ID number EPA-HQ-OPP-
2008-

0129. EPA's policy is that all comments received will be included in
the docket without change and may be made available on-line at http://
www.regulations.gov, including any personal information provided,
unless the comment includes information claimed to be Confidential
Business Information (CBI) or other information whose disclosure is
restricted by statute. Do not submit information that you consider to
be CBI or otherwise protected through regulations.gov or e-mail. The
regulations.gov website is an ``anonymous access'' system, which means
EPA will not know your identity or contact information unless you
provide it in the body of your comment. If you send an e-mail comment
directly to EPA without going through regulations.gov, your e-mail
address will be automatically captured and included as part of the
comment that is placed in the docket and made available on the
Internet. If you submit an electronic comment, EPA recommends that you
include your name and other contact information in the body of your
comment and with any disk or CD-ROM you submit. If EPA cannot read your
comment due to technical difficulties and cannot contact you for
clarification, EPA may not be able to consider your comment. Electronic
files should avoid the use of special characters, any form of
encryption, and be free of any defects or viruses.
    Docket: All documents in the docket are listed in the docket index
available in regulations.gov. To access the electronic docket, go to
http://www.regulations.gov, select ``Advanced Search,'' then ``Docket
Search.'' Insert the docket ID number where indicated and select the
``Submit'' button. Follow the instructions on the regulations.gov
website to view the docket index or access available documents.
Although listed in the index, some information is not publicly
available, e.g., CBI or other information whose disclosure is
restricted by statute. Certain other material, such as copyrighted
material, is not placed on the Internet and will be publicly available
only in hard copy form. Publicly available docket materials are
available either in the electronic docket at http://
www.regulations.gov, or, if only available in hard copy, at the OPP
Regulatory Public Docket in Rm. S-4400, One Potomac Yard (South Bldg.),
2777 S. Crystal Dr., Arlington, VA. The hours of operation of this
Docket Facility are from 8:30 a.m. to 4 p.m., Monday through Friday,
excluding legal holidays. The Docket Facility telephone number is (703)
305-5805.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Rusty Wasem, Special Review and
Reregistration Division (7508P), Office of Pesticide Programs,
Environmental Protection Agency, 1200 Pennsylvania Ave., NW.,
Washington, DC 20460-0001; telephone number:<PHONE_NUMBER>; fax
number:<PHONE_NUMBER>; e-mail address<EMAIL_ADDRESS>
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

I. General Information

A. Does this Action Apply to Me?

    This action is directed to the public in general, and may be of
interest to a wide range of stakeholders including environmental, human
health, and agricultural advocates; the chemical industry; pesticide
users; and members of the public interested in the sale, distribution,
or use of pesticides. Since others also may be interested, the Agency
has not attempted to describe all the specific entities that may be
affected by this action. If you have any questions regarding the
applicability of this action to a particular entity, consult the person
listed under FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT.

B. What Should I Consider as I Prepare My Comments for EPA?

    1.  Submitting CBI. Do not submit this information to EPA through
regulations.gov or e-mail. Clearly mark the part or all of the
information that you claim to be CBI. For CBI information in a disk or
CD-ROM that you mail to EPA, mark the outside of the disk or CD-ROM as
CBI and then identify electronically within the disk or CD-ROM the
specific information that is claimed as CBI. In addition to one
complete version of the comment that includes information claimed as
CBI, a copy of the comment that does not contain the information
claimed as CBI must be submitted for inclusion in the public docket.
Information so marked will not be disclosed except in accordance with
procedures set forth in 40 CFR part 2.
    2.  Tips for preparing your comments. When submitting comments,
remember to:
    i. Identify the document by docket ID number and other identifying
information (subject heading, Federal Register date and page number).
     ii. Follow directions. The Agency may ask you to respond to
specific questions or organize comments by referencing a Code of
Federal Regulations (CFR) part or section number.
    iii. Explain why you agree or disagree; suggest alternatives and
substitute language for your requested changes.
     iv. Describe any assumptions and provide any technical information
and/or data that you used.
    v. If you estimate potential costs or burdens, explain how you
arrived at your estimate in sufficient detail to allow for it to be
reproduced.
    vi. Provide specific examples to illustrate your concerns and
suggest alternatives.
    vii. Explain your views as clearly as possible, avoiding the use of
profanity or personal threats.
     viii. Make sure to submit your comments by the comment period
deadline identified.

II. Background

A. What Action is the Agency Taking?

    EPA is releasing for public comment its human health and
environmental fate and effects risk assessments and related documents
for sulfometuron methyl and soliciting public comment on risk
management ideas or proposals. Sulfometuron methyl is a non-selective
sulfonylurea herbicide primarily used for weed control in forestry, and
vegetative management in rights of ways, roadways, and railroads. There
are no food uses for sulfometuron methyl. EPA developed the risk
assessments and risk characterization for sulfometuron methyl through a
modified version of its public process for making pesticide
reregistration eligibility decisions. Through these programs, EPA is
ensuring that pesticides meet current standards under the Federal
Insecticide, Fungicide, and Rodenticide Act (FIFRA) and the Federal
Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act (FFDCA), as amended by the Food Quality
Protection Act of 1996 (FQPA).
    Sulfometuron methyl controls a variety of broad leaf weeds and
grasses by inhibiting the activity of the enzyme acetolactate synthase
(ALS), which inhibits the production of amino acids required for
growth. Sulfometuron methyl is formulated as a water dispersible
granule (WDG) and applied using a variety of methods including
helicopter, fixed-wing aircraft, ground spray (boom and backpack), and
spot treatment.
    EPA is providing an opportunity, through this notice, for
interested parties to provide comments and input on the Agency's risk
assessments for sulfometuron methyl. Such comments and input could
address the availability of additional data to further refine the risk
assessments, or could address the Agency's risk assessment
methodologies and assumptions as applied to this specific pesticide.
    Through this notice, EPA also is providing an opportunity for
interested

parties to provide risk management proposals or otherwise comment on
risk management for sulfometuron methyl. Risks of concern associated
with the use of sulfometuron methyl are: indirect effects on freshwater
fish and invertebrates, estuarine/marine fish and invertebrates, and
acute and chronic exposure to aquatic and terrestrial plants. In
targeting these risks of concern, the Agency solicits information on
effective and practical risk reduction measures.
    EPA seeks to achieve environmental justice, the fair treatment and
meaningful involvement of all people, regardless of race, color,
national origin, or income, in the development, implementation, and
enforcement of environmental laws, regulations, and policies. To help
address potential environmental justice issues, the Agency seeks
information on any groups or segments of the population who, as a
result of their location, cultural practices, or other factors, may
have atypical, unusually high exposure to sulfometuron methyl, compared
to the general population.
    EPA is applying the principles of public participation to all
pesticides undergoing reregistration. The Agency's Pesticide Tolerance
Reassessment and Reregistration; Public Participation Process,
published in the Federal Register on May 14, 2004 (69 FR 26819) (FRL-
7357-9), explains that in conducting these programs, the Agency is
tailoring its public participation process to be commensurate with the
level of risk, extent of use, complexity of the issues, and degree of
public concern associated with each pesticide. For sulfometuron methyl,
a modified, 4-Phase process with one comment period seems appropriate
in view of its limited risk and few complex issues. However, if as a
result of comments received during this comment period EPA finds that
additional issues warranting further discussion are raised, the Agency
may lengthen the process and include a second comment period, as
needed.
    All comments should be submitted using the methods in ADDRESSES,
and must be received by EPA on or before the closing date. Comments
will become part of the Agency Docket for sulfometuron methyl. Comments
received after the close of the comment period will be marked ``late.''
EPA is not required to consider these late comments.

B. What is the Agency's Authority for Taking this Action?

    Section 4(g)(2) of FIFRA, as amended, directs that, after
submission of all data concerning a pesticide active ingredient, ``the
Administrator shall determine whether pesticides containing such active
ingredient are eligible for reregistration,'' before calling in
product-specific data on individual end-use products and either
reregistering products or taking other ``appropriate regulatory
action.''

List of Subjects

    Environmental protection, Pesticides and pests.

    Dated: February 21, 2008.
Peter Caulkins,
Acting Director, Special Review and Reregistration Division, Office of
Pesticide Programs.
[FR Doc. E8-3699 Filed 2-26-08; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 6560-50-S


[Federal Register Volume 84, Number 174 (Monday, September 9, 2019)]
[Notices]
[Pages 47276-47277]
[FR Doc No: 2019-19427]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission

[Docket No. CP19-501-000]

Texas Eastern Transmission, LP; Notice of Application

    Take notice that on August 19, 2019, Texas Eastern Transmission, LP
(Texas Eastern), 5400 Westheimer Court, Houston, Texas 77056-5310,
filed in Docket No. CP19-501-000 an application pursuant to section
7(c) of the Natural Gas Act (NGA) requesting a certificate of public
convenience and necessity for its proposed Bailey East Mine Panel 11J
Project. Specifically, Texas Eastern proposes to excavate, elevate, and
replace certain segments of four different natural gas transmission
pipelines (Lines 10, 15, 25, and 30, and appurtenant facilities) and to
monitor potential strains on the pipeline sections due to longwall
mining activities planned by CONSOL Energy, Inc. in Marshall County,
West Virginia. The Bailey East Mine Panel 11J Project is designed to
ensure the safe and efficient operation of Texas Eastern's existing
pipeline facilities at their certificated design capacities for the
duration of the planned longwall mining activities beneath Texas
Eastern's pipelines. Texas Eastern estimates the cost of the Bailey
East Mine Panel 11J Project to be $30,536,853, all as more fully
described in the application which is on file with the Commission and
open to public inspection.
    The filing is available for review at the Commission in the Public
Reference Room or may be viewed on the Commission's website web at
http://www.ferc.gov using the ``eLibrary'' link. Enter the docket
number excluding the last three digits in the docket number field to
access the document. For assistance, contact FERC at
<EMAIL_ADDRESS>or call toll-free,<PHONE_NUMBER> or TYY,
(202) 502-8659.
    Any questions concerning this application may be directed to Lisa
A. Connolly, Director, Rates and Certificates, Texas Eastern
Transmission, LP, P.O. Box 1642 Houston, Texas 77251-1642, by telephone
at<PHONE_NUMBER>, or by email<EMAIL_ADDRESS>    Pursuant to section 157.9 of the Commission's rules, 18 CFR 157.9,
within 90 days of this Notice the Commission staff will either:
complete its environmental assessment (EA) and place it into the
Commission's public record (eLibrary) for this proceeding; or issue a
Notice of Schedule for Environmental Review. If a Notice of Schedule
for Environmental Review is issued, it will indicate, among other
milestones, the anticipated date for the Commission staff's issuance of
the EA for this proposal. The filing of the EA in the Commission's
public record for this proceeding or the issuance of a Notice of
Schedule for Environmental Review will serve to notify federal and
state agencies of the timing for the completion of all necessary
reviews, and the subsequent need to complete all federal authorizations
within 90 days of the date of issuance of the Commission staff's EA.
    There are two ways to become involved in the Commission's review of
this project. First, any person wishing to obtain legal status by
becoming a party to the proceedings for this project should, on or
before the comment date stated below file with the Federal Energy
Regulatory Commission, 888 First Street NE, Washington, DC 20426, a
motion to intervene in accordance with the requirements of the
Commission's Rules of Practice and Procedure (18 CFR 385.214 or
385.211) and the Regulations under the NGA (18 CFR 157.10). A person
obtaining party status will be placed on the service list maintained by
the Secretary of the Commission and will receive copies of all
documents filed by the applicant and by all other parties. A party must
submit 3 copies of filings made in the proceeding with the Commission
and must provide a copy to the applicant and to every other party. Only
parties to the proceeding can ask for court review of Commission orders
in the proceeding.
    However, a person does not have to intervene in order to have
comments considered. The second way to participate is by filing with
the Secretary of the Commission, as soon as possible, an original and
two copies of comments in support of or in opposition to this project.
The Commission will consider these comments in determining the
appropriate action to be taken, but the filing of a comment alone will
not serve to make the filer a party to the proceeding. The Commission's
rules require that persons filing comments in opposition to the project
provide copies of their protests only to the party or parties directly
involved in the protest.
    Persons who wish to comment only on the environmental review of
this project should submit an original and two copies of their comments
to the Secretary of the Commission. Environmental commenters will be
placed on the Commission's environmental mailing list and will be
notified of any meetings associated with the Commission's environmental
review process. Environmental commenters will not be required to serve
copies of filed documents on all other parties. However, the non-party
commenters will not receive copies of all documents filed by other
parties or issued by the Commission and will not have the right to seek
court review of the Commission's final order.
    As of the February 27, 2018 date of the Commission's order in
Docket No. CP16-4-001, the Commission will apply its revised practice
concerning out-of-time motions to intervene in any new Natural Gas Act
section 3 or section 7 proceeding.\1\ Persons desiring to become a
party to a certificate proceeding are to intervene in a timely manner.
If seeking to intervene out-of-time, the movant is required to show
good cause why the time limitation should be waived, and should provide
justification by reference to factors set forth in Rule 214(d)(1) of
the Commission's Rules and Regulations.\2\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \1\ Tennessee Gas Pipeline Company, L.L.C., 162 FERC 61,167 at
50 (2018).
    \2\ 18 CFR 385.214(d)(1).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    The Commission strongly encourages electronic filings of comments,
protests and interventions in lieu of paper using the eFiling link at
http://www.ferc.gov. Persons unable to file electronically should
submit an original and 3 copies of the protest or intervention to the
Federal Energy regulatory Commission,

888 First Street NE, Washington, DC 20426.
    Comment Date: 5 p.m. Eastern Time on September 24, 2019.

    Dated: September 3, 2019.
Nathaniel J. Davis, Sr.,
Deputy Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2019-19427 Filed 9-6-19; 8:45 am]
 BILLING CODE 6717-01-P


[Federal Register: June 1, 2006 (Volume 71, Number 105)]
[Notices]
[Page 31230]
[DOCID:fr01jn06-111]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

Collection; Comment Request

Upon Written Request, Copies Available From: Securities and Exchange
Commission, Office of Filings and Information Services, Washington, DC
20549.

Extension: Rule 202(a)(11)-1; SEC File No. 270-471; OMB Control No.
3235-0532.

    Notice is hereby given that pursuant to the Paperwork Reduction Act
of 1995 (44 U.S.C. 3501 et seq.) the Securities and Exchange Commission
(the ``Commission'') is soliciting comments on the collection of
information summarized below. The Commission plans to submit this
existing collection of information to the Office of Management and
Budget (``OMB'') for extension and approval.
    The title for the collection of information is ``Certain Broker-
Dealers Deemed Not To Be Investment Advisers.'' Rule 202(a)(11)-1 (17
CFR 275.202(a)(11)-1) under the Investment Advisers Act of 1940 (15
U.S.C. 80b-1 et seq.) (``Advisers Act'') addresses the application of
the Advisers Act to broker-dealers offering accounts charging an asset-
based fee. The rule is intended to clarify when brokers offering these
programs are subject to the provisions of the Advisers Act. The rule
requires that all advertisements for brokerage accounts charging an
asset-based fee and all agreements and contracts governing the
operation of those accounts contain a certain prominent statement that
the accounts are brokerage accounts and not advisory accounts. This
collection of information is necessary so that customers are not
confused with respect to the services that they are receiving, i.e., to
prevent customers and prospective customers from mistakenly believing
that the account is an advisory account subject to the Advisers Act.
The collection assists customers in making informed decisions regarding
whether to establish accounts.
    The respondents to this collection of information are all broker-
dealers that are registered with the Commission. The Commission has
estimated that the average annual burden for ensuring compliance with
the disclosure element of the rule is 5 minutes per broker-dealer
taking advantage of the rule. If all of the approximately 6,158 broker-
dealers registered with the Commission took advantage of the rule, the
total estimated annual burden would be 511 hours (.083 hours x 6,158
brokers).
    Written comments are invited on: (a) Whether the collection of
information is necessary for the proper performance of the functions of
the agency, including whether the information will have practical
utility; (b) the accuracy of the agency's estimate of the burden of the
collection of information; (c) ways to enhance the quality, utility,
and clarity of the information collected; and (d) ways to minimize the
burden of the collection of information on respondents, including
through the use of automated collection techniques or other forms of
information technology. Consideration will be given to comments and
suggestions submitted in writing within 60 days of this publication.
    Please direct your written comments to R. Corey Booth, Director/
Chief Information Officer, Securities and Exchange Commission, C/O
Shirley Martinson, 6432 General Green Way, Alexandria, Virginia 22312,
or send an e-mail to<EMAIL_ADDRESS>
    Dated: May 24, 2006.
Jill M. Peterson,
Assistant Secretary.
[FR Doc. E6-8495 Filed 5-31-06; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 8010-01-P


[Federal Register: December 1, 2008 (Volume 73, Number 231)]
[Notices]
[Page 72898]
[DOCID:fr01de08-142]

=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION

Federal Aviation Administration

Agency Information Collection Activity Seeking OMB Approval

AGENCY: Federal Aviation Administration (FAA), DOT.

ACTION: Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The FAA invites public comments about our intention to request
the Office of Management and Budget's (OMB) revision of a current
information collection. The Federal Register Notice with a 60-day
comment period soliciting comments on the following collection of
information was published on June 19, 2008, vol. 73, no. 119, pages
34975-34976. The rule requires passengers who intend to use an approved
POC to present a physician statement before boarding.

DATES: Please submit comments by December 31, 2008.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Carla Mauney at<EMAIL_ADDRESS>
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

Federal Aviation Administration (FAA)

    Title: Use of Certain Personal Oxygen Concentrator (POC) Devices on
Board Aircraft.
    Type of Request: Extension without change of a currently approved
collection.
    OMB Control Number: 2120-0702.
    Form(s): There are no FAA forms associated with this collection.
    Affected Public: An estimated 1,735,000 Respondents.
    Frequency: This information is collected on occasion.
    Estimated Average Burden per Response: Approximately 6 minutes per
response.
    Estimated Annual Burden Hours: An estimated 172,694 hours annually.
    Abstract: The rule requires passengers who intend to use an
approved POC to present a physician statement before boarding. The
flight crew must then inform the pilot-in-command that a POC is on
board.

ADDRESSES: Interested persons are invited to submit written comments on
the proposed information collection to the Office of Information and
Regulatory Affairs, Office of Management and Budget. Comments should be
addressed to the attention of the Desk Officer, Department of
Transportation/FAA, and sent via electronic mail to oira_
submission@omb.eop,gov, or faxed to<PHONE_NUMBER>, or mailed to the
Office of Information and Regulatory Affairs, Office of Management and
Budget, Docket Library, Room 10102, 725 17th Street, NW., Washington,
DC 20503.
    Comments are invited on: Whether the proposed collection of
information is necessary for the proper performance of the functions of
the Department, including whether the information will have practical
utility; the accuracy of the Department's estimates of the burden of
the proposed information collection; ways to enhance the quality,
utility, and clarity of the information to be collected; and ways to
minimize the burden of the collection of information on respondents,
including the use of automated collection techniques or other forms of
information technology.

    Issued in Washington, DC, on November 19, 2008.
Carla Mauney,
FAA Information Collection Clearance Officer, IT Enterprises Business
Services Division, AES-200.
 [FR Doc. E8-28028 Filed 11-28-08; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4910-13-M


Neal Fann/RTP/USEPA/US

05/16/2008 01:31 PM

To

Kathy Kaufman/RTP/USEPA/US@EPA

cc

"King, Heidi R."<EMAIL_ADDRESS>Lydia Wegman/RTP/USEPA/US@EPA, Ron Evans/RTP/USEPA/US@EPA, Tricia Crabtree/RTP/USEPA/US@EPA, Charles Fulcher/RTP/USEPA/US@EPA

Subject

Re: Right back atcha

Heidi,

I modified the table slightly to better characterize the fact that we did not project background blood lead levels to 2020. Let me know what you think.

Thanks,

Neal

_________________________________

Neal Fann

USEPA

Office of Air Quality Planning & Standards

Air Benefit and Cost Group

C439-02

RTP, NC 27711

voice:<PHONE_NUMBER>

fax:<PHONE_NUMBER>

Kathy Kaufman/RTP/USEPA/US

05/16/2008 12:14 PM

To

"King, Heidi R."<EMAIL_ADDRESS> cc

Neal Fann/RTP/USEPA/US@EPA, Ron Evans/RTP/USEPA/US@EPA, Lydia Wegman/RTP/USEPA/US@EPA, Tricia Crabtree/RTP/USEPA/US@EPA

Subject

Right back atcha

[attachment "Heidi's language.doc" deleted by Neal Fann/RTP/USEPA/US]

Heidi -- we need Neal to check the benefits numbers in the table, but here's our collective revision.

Thanks.

-- Kathy

Kathy Kaufman

EPA/OAQPS Mail Code C539-03

Research Triangle Park, NC 27711

Phone<PHONE_NUMBER>

Fax<PHONE_NUMBER>

"King, Heidi R."<EMAIL_ADDRESS> 

These sentences for the most part are taken from Chap 5 and 6 – and the table is what I understood on the ph this morning.

I hope no surprises !!

ਁ⠃愀϶(ࠀ•

Ü

Ý

␷㠀$⑈崀ᢄ帖や愑Ȥ摧Ⲷ@ࠀ~

€

‚

„

ਁ⠃愀϶(ሀelete similar language that appears in later paragraphs (at the very least “sweep” to make sure characterization is consistent, for example on decision whether to use “welfare” wording)

Thanks for working on this with me --

heidi[attachment "This Regulatory Impact Analysis.doc" deleted by Neal Fann/RTP/USEPA/US]


[Federal Register Volume 85, Number 224 (Thursday, November 19, 2020)]
[Notices]
[Pages 73825-73826]
[FR Doc No: 2020-25506]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

[Release No. 34-90430/November 13, 2020]

 Order Setting Aside the Order by Delegated Authority
Disapproving SR-NYSEArca-2018-02; In the Matter of NYSE Arca, Inc., 11
Wall St., New York, NY 10005; File No. SR-NYSEArca-2018-02

    On January 4, 2018, NYSE Arca, Inc. (``NYSE Arca'') filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission (``Commission''), pursuant to
Section 19(b)(1) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (``Exchange
Act'') \1\ and Rule 19b-4 thereunder,\2\ a proposed rule change to list
and trade shares of Direxion Daily Bitcoin Bear 1X Shares, Direxion
Daily Bitcoin 1.25X Bull Shares, Direxion Daily Bitcoin 1.5X Bull
Shares, Direxion Daily Bitcoin 2X Bull Shares, and Direxion Daily
Bitcoin 2X Bear Shares under NYSE Arca Rule 8.200-E, Commentary .02.
The proposed rule change was published for comment in the Federal
Register on January 24, 2018.\3\ On March 1, 2018, pursuant to Section
19(b)(2) of the Exchange Act,\4\ the Division of Trading and Markets
(``Division''), for the Commission pursuant to delegated authority,
designated a longer period within which to approve the proposed rule
change, disapprove the proposed rule change, or institute proceedings
to determine whether to approve or disapprove the proposed rule
change.\5\ On April 23, 2018, the Division, for the Commission pursuant
to delegated authority, instituted proceedings under Section
19(b)(2)(B) of the Exchange Act \6\ to determine whether to approve or
disapprove the proposed rule change.\7\ On July 18, 2018, the Division,
for the Commission pursuant to delegated authority, extended the period
for consideration of the proposed rule change.\8\ On August 22, 2018,
the Division, for the Commission pursuant to delegated authority,\9\
disapproved the proposed rule change.\10\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \1\ 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(1).
    \2\ 17 CFR 240.19b-4.
    \3\ See Securities Exchange Act Release No. 82532 (Jan. 18,
2018), 83 FR 3380.
    \4\ 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(2).
    \5\ See Securities Exchange Act Release No. 82795, 83 FR 9768
(Mar. 7, 2018).
    \6\ 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(2)(B).
    \7\ See Securities Exchange Act Release No. 83094, 83 FR 18603
(Apr. 27, 2018).
    \8\ See Securities Exchange Act Release No. 83661, 83 FR 35040
(July 24, 2018).
    \9\ 17 CFR 200.30-3(a)(12).
    \10\ See Securities Exchange Act Release No. 83912, 83 FR 43912
(Aug. 28, 2018) (``Delegated Order'').
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    On August 23, 2018, the Secretary of the Commission notified NYSE
Arca that, pursuant to Commission Rule of Practice 431,\11\ the
Commission would review the Division's action pursuant to delegated
authority and that the Division's action pursuant to delegated
authority was stayed until the Commission orders otherwise.\12\ On
October 4, 2018, the Commission issued a scheduling order allowing the
filing of additional statements.\13\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \11\ 17 CFR 201.431.
    \12\ See Letter from Secretary, Commission, to Eugene Schlanger,
Counsel, NYSE Group, Inc., dated Aug. 23, 2018, available at https://www.sec.gov/rules/sro/nysearca/2018/34-83912-letter-from-secretary.pdf.
    \13\ See Securities Exchange Act Release No. 84370, 83 FR 51531
(Oct. 11, 2018).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    On June 17, 2020, NYSE Arca withdrew the proposed rule change (SR-
NYSEArca-2018-02).\14\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \14\ See letter from David De Gregorio, Senior Counsel, NYSE
Arca, to Secretary, Commission, dated June 17, 2020, available at
https://www.sec.gov/comments/sr-nysearca-2018-02/srnysearca201802-7415693-219417.pdf.

---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    Under Commission Rule of Practice 431(a), the Commission may
``affirm, reverse, modify, set aside or remand for further proceedings,
in whole or in part, any action made pursuant to'' delegated
authority.\15\ We find that, in light of the NYSE Arca's withdrawal of
the proposed rule change, it is appropriate to set aside the Delegated
Order.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \15\ 17 CFR 201.431(a).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    Accordingly, it is ordered that the August 22, 2018, order
disapproving by delegated authority NYSE Arca's proposed rule change
number SR-NYSEArca-2018-02, be, and it hereby is, set aside.

    By the Commission.
J. Matthew DeLesDernier,
Assistant Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2020-25506 Filed 11-18-20; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 8011-01-P


[Federal Register: May 3, 2010 (Volume 75, Number 84)]
[Notices]
[Page 23262-23263]
[DOCID:fr03my10-69]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission

Notice of FERC Staff Attendance at the Southwest Power Pool ICT
Stakeholder Policy Committee Meeting and the Entergy Regional State
Committee Meeting

April 26, 2010.
    The Federal Energy Regulatory Commission hereby gives notice that
members of its staff may attend the meetings noted below. Their
attendance is part of the Commission's ongoing outreach efforts.

ICT Stakeholder Policy Committee Meeting

May 12, 2010 (8 a.m.-12 p.m.), Hilton Baton Rouge Capitol Center, 201
Lafayette Street, Baton Rouge, LA 70801,<PHONE_NUMBER>.

Entergy Regional State Committee Meeting

May 12, 2010 (1 p.m.-5 p.m.)
May 13, 2010 (8 a.m.-12 p.m.), Hilton Baton Rouge Capitol Center, 201
Lafayette Street, Baton Rouge, LA 70801,<PHONE_NUMBER>.

    The discussions may address matters at issue in the following
proceedings:

Docket No. OA07-32...........  Entergy Services, Inc.
Docket No. OA08-59...........  Entergy Services, Inc.
Docket No. EL00-66...........  Louisiana Public Service Commission v.
                                Entergy Services, Inc.
Docket No. EL01-88...........  Louisiana Public Service Commission v.
                                Entergy Services, Inc.
Docket No. EL05-15...........  Arkansas Electric Cooperative Corp. v.
                                Entergy Arkansas, Inc.
Docket No. EL07-52...........  Louisiana Public Service Commission v.
                                Entergy Services, Inc.
Docket No. EL08-51...........  Louisiana Public Service Commission v.
                                Entergy Services, Inc.
Docket No. EL08-60...........  Ameren Services Co. v. Entergy Services,
                                Inc.

Docket No. EL09-43...........  Arkansas Public Service Commission v.
                                Entergy Services, Inc.
Docket No. EL09-61...........  Louisiana Public Service Commission v.
                                Entergy Services, Inc.
Docket No. EL09-78...........  South Mississippi Electric Power
                                Association v. Entergy Services, Inc.
Docket No. EL10-55...........  Louisiana Public Service Commission v.
                                Entergy Services, Inc.
Docket No. ER05-1065.........  Entergy Services, Inc.
Docket No. ER07-682..........  Entergy Services, Inc.
Docket No. ER07-956..........  Entergy Services, Inc.
Docket No. ER08-767..........  Entergy Services, Inc.
Docket No. ER08-1056.........  Entergy Services, Inc.
Docket No. ER08-1057.........  Entergy Services, Inc.
Docket No. ER09-636..........  Entergy Services, Inc.
Docket No. ER09-833..........  Entergy Services, Inc.
Docket No. ER09-877..........  Entergy Services, Inc.
Docket No. ER09-882..........  Entergy Services, Inc.
Docket No. ER09-1214.........  Entergy Services, Inc.
Docket No. ER09-1224.........  Entergy Services, Inc.
Docket No. ER10-794..........  Entergy Services, Inc.
Docket No. ER10-879..........  Entergy Services, Inc.
Docket No. ER10-984..........  Entergy Services, Inc.

    These meetings are open to the public.
    For more information, contact Patrick Clarey, Office of Energy
Market Regulation, Federal Energy Regulatory Commission at (317) 249-
5937 or<EMAIL_ADDRESS>
Kimberly D. Bose,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2010-10217 Filed 4-30-10; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6717-01-P


[Federal Register: January 7, 2009 (Volume 74, Number 4)]
[Notices]
[Page 748-749]
[DOCID:fr07ja09-64]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

[Release No. 34-59178; File No. SR-NYSE-2008-137]

Self-Regulatory Organizations; New York Stock Exchange LLC;
Notice of Filing and Immediate Effectiveness of Proposed Rule Change To
Extend the Pilot Program That Offers Liquidity Takers a Reduced
Transaction Fee Structure for Certain Bond Trades Executed on the NYSE
Bonds System

December 30, 2008.
    Pursuant to Section 19(b)(1) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934
(``Act'') \1\ and Rule 19b-4 thereunder,\2\ notice is hereby given that
on December 22, 2008, the New York Stock Exchange LLC (``NYSE'' or the
``Exchange'') filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission
(``Commission'') the proposed rule change as described in Items I, II,
and III below, which Items have been prepared by NYSE. The Exchange has
designated this proposal as one establishing or changing a due, fee, or
other charge imposed by the Exchange under Section 19(b)(3)(A)(ii) of
the Act \3\ and Rule 19b-4(f)(2) thereunder,\4\ which renders the
proposal effective upon filing with the Commission. The Commission is
publishing this notice to solicit comments on the proposed rule change
from interested persons.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \1\ 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(1).
    \2\ 17 CFR 240.19b-4.
    \3\ 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(3)(A)(ii).
    \4\ 17 CFR 240.19b-4(f)(2).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

I. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement of the Terms of Substance
of the Proposed Rule Change

    The Exchange proposes to extend the pilot program that offers
liquidity takers a reduced transaction fee structure for certain bond
trades executed on the NYSE Bonds\SM\ system (``NYSE Bonds'') to
December 31, 2009. The Exchange also seeks to make technical amendments
to the fee schedule.
    The text of the proposed rule change is available at NYSE, the
Commission's Public Reference Room, and http://www.nyse.com.

II. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement of the Purpose of, and
Statutory Basis for, the Proposed Rule Change

    In its filing with the Commission, NYSE included statements
concerning the purpose of, and basis for, the proposed rule change and
discussed any comments it received on the proposed rule change. The
text of these statements may be examined at the places specified in
Item IV below. NYSE has prepared summaries, set forth in Sections A, B,
and C below, of the most significant aspects of such statements.

A. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement of the Purpose of, and
Statutory Basis for, the Proposed Rule Change

1. Purpose
    The Exchange proposes to extend the pilot program that offers
liquidity takers a reduced transaction fee structure for certain bond
trades executed on the NYSE Bonds\SM\ system (``NYSE Bonds'') to
December 31, 2009.
    The Exchange's pilot program reduces transaction fees charged to
liquidity takers for transactions executed on NYSE Bonds with a
staggered transaction fee schedule based on the number of bonds
purchased or sold in excess of ten (10) bonds. Currently, the
transaction fee for orders that take liquidity from the market is $.50
per bond. This fee remains unchanged for orders up to ten (10) bonds.
The extended fee filing pilot program provides for the following
transaction fee schedule: (1) When the liquidity taker purchases or
sells from one to ten (10) bonds, the Exchange will charge an execution
fee of $0.50 per bond; (2) when the liquidity taker purchases or sells
from eleven (11) to twenty-five (25) bonds, the Exchange will charge an
execution fee of $0.20 per bond, and (3) when the liquidity taker
purchases or sells twenty-six (26) bonds or more, the Exchange will
charge an execution fee of $0.10 per bond.
    For example, if a liquidity taker purchases or sells five (5)
bonds, the Exchange will charge $.50 per bond, or a total of $2.50 for
execution fees. If a liquidity taker purchases or sells twenty (20)
bonds, the Exchange will charge $.20 per bond or a total of $4.00 for
execution fees. If a liquidity taker purchases or sells thirty (30)
bonds, the Exchange will charge $.10 per bond or a total of $3.00 for
execution fees.
    The Exchange will impose a $100 execution fee cap per transaction.
    Additionally, the Exchange seeks to clarify the language in the fee
schedule by replacing the word ``order'' with ``execution.'' The
Exchange is not charging liquidity takers for these orders but rather
will be charging for the executions of those orders. Accordingly, the
Exchange has proposed to amend the fee schedule to clarify the current
language in the fee schedule.
2. Statutory Basis
    The Exchange believes that the proposed rule change is consistent
with

the provisions of Section 6 of the Act \5\ in general and furthers the
objectives of Section 6(b)(4) of the Act \6\ in particular, in that it
is designed to provide for the equitable allocation of reasonable dues,
fees, and other charges among its members and other persons using its
facilities.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \5\ 15 U.S.C. 78f.
    \6\ 15 U.S.C. 78f(b)(4).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

B. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement on Burden on Competition

    The Exchange does not believe that the proposed rule change will
impose any burden on competition that is not necessary or appropriate
in furtherance of purposes of the Act.

C. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement on Comments on the Proposed
Rule Change Received From Members, Participants or Others

    No written comments were solicited or received with respect to the
proposed rule change.

III. Date of Effectiveness of the Proposed Rule Change and Timing for
Commission Action

    Because the foregoing rule change establishes or changes a due,
fee, or other charge imposed by the Exchange, it has become effective
pursuant to Section 19(b)(3)(A) of the Act \7\ and subparagraph (f)(2)
of Rule 19b-4 thereunder.\8\ At any time within 60 days of the filing
of the proposed rule change, the Commission may summarily abrogate such
rule change if it appears to the Commission that such action is
necessary or appropriate in the public interest, for the protection of
investors, or otherwise in furtherance of the purposes of the Act.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \7\ 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(3)(A).
    \8\ 17 CFR 240.19b-4(f)(2).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

IV. Solicitation of Comments

    Interested persons are invited to submit written data, views, and
arguments concerning the foregoing, including whether the proposed rule
change is consistent with the Act. Comments may be submitted by any of
the following methods:

Electronic Comments

     Use the Commission's Internet comment form (http://
www.sec.gov/rules/sro.shtml); or
     Send an e-mail to<EMAIL_ADDRESS>Please include
File Number SR-NYSE-2008-137 on the subject line.

Paper Comments

     Send paper comments in triplicate to Secretary, Securities
and Exchange Commission, 100 F Street, NE., Washington, DC 20549-1090.

All submissions should refer to File Number SR-NYSE-2008-137. This file
number should be included on the subject line if e-mail is used. To
help the Commission process and review your comments more efficiently,
please use only one method. The Commission will post all comments on
the Commission's Internet Web site (http://www.sec.gov/rules/
sro.shtml). Copies of the submission, all subsequent amendments, all
written statements with respect to the proposed rule change that are
filed with the Commission, and all written communications relating to
the proposed rule change between the Commission and any person, other
than those that may be withheld from the public in accordance with the
provisions of 5 U.S.C. 552, will be available for inspection and
copying in the Commission's Public Reference Room, 100 F Street, NE.,
Washington, DC 20549, on official business days between the hours of 10
a.m. and 3 p.m. Copies of such filing also will be available for
inspection and copying at the principal office of NYSE. All comments
received will be posted without change; the Commission does not edit
personal identifying information from submissions. You should submit
only information that you wish to make available publicly. All
submissions should refer to File Number SR-NYSE-2008-137 and should be
submitted on or before January 28, 2009.

    For the Commission, by the Division of Trading and Markets,
pursuant to delegated authority.\9\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \9\ 17 CFR 200.30-3(a)(12).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

Florence E. Harmon,
Acting Secretary.
 [FR Doc. E9-4 Filed 1-6-09; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 8011-01-P