[Federal Register Volume 86, Number 166 (Tuesday, August 31, 2021)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Page 48511]
[FR Doc No: 2021-18262]

=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY

Federal Emergency Management Agency

44 CFR Parts 59, 61, and 62

[Docket ID FEMA-2018-0026]
RIN 1660-AA95

National Flood Insurance Program: Conforming Changes To Reflect
the Biggert-Waters Flood Insurance Reform Act of 2012 (BW-12) and the
Homeowners Flood Insurance Affordability Act of 2014 (HFIAA), and
Additional Clarifications for Plain Language; Correction

AGENCY: Federal Emergency Management Agency; DHS.

ACTION: Final rule; correction.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: On July 20, 2020, FEMA published in the Federal Register a
final rule revising the National Flood Insurance Program (NFIP)
regulations to codify certain provisions of the Biggert-Waters Flood
Insurance Reform Act of 2012 and the Homeowner Flood Insurance
Affordability Act of 2014, and to clarify certain existing NFIP rules
relating to NFIP operations and the Standard Flood Insurance Policy.
This final rule provides corrections to those instructions, to be used
in lieu of the information published July 20.

DATES: This correction is effective October 1, 2021.

ADDRESSES: The docket for this rulemaking is available for inspection
using the Federal eRulemaking Portal at http://www.regulations.gov and
can be viewed by following that website's instructions.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Kelly Bronowicz, Director,
Policyholder Services Division, Federal Insurance and Mitigation
Administration, Federal Emergency Management Agency, 400 C Street SW,
Washington, DC 20472,<PHONE_NUMBER>.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: In FR Doc. 2020-09260, beginning on page
43946 in the Federal Register of Monday, July 20, 2020, the following
corrections are made:

PART 61--INSURANCE COVERAGE AND RATES

Appendix A(1) to Part 61 [Corrected]

0
1. On page 43961, in the first column, in Appendix A(1) to Part 61,
article III.A.5.a, ``(see II.B.6.a)'' is corrected to read ``(see
II.C.6.a)''.

0
2. On page 43963, in the second column, in Appendix A(1) to Part 61,
article IV.4, ``(see II.B.6.c)'' is corrected to read ``(see
II.C.6.c)''.

Appendix A(2) to Part 61 [Corrected]

0
3. On page 43970, in the first column, in Appendix A(2) to Part 61,
article III.A.6.a, ``(see II.B.6.a.)'' is corrected to read ``(see
II.C.6.a)''.

Appendix A(3) to Part 61 [Corrected]

0
4. On page 43978, in the first column, in Appendix A(3) to Part 61,
article III.A.6.a, ``(see II.B.6.a.)'' is corrected to read ``(see
II.C.6.a)''.

Deanne B. Criswell,
Administrator, Federal Emergency Management Agency.
[FR Doc. 2021-18262 Filed 8-30-21; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 9111-52-P


Keith Barnett/RTP/USEPA/US
07/16/2007 11:04 AM	To
<EMAIL_ADDRESS>	cc

	bcc

	Subject
	Notes for out May 23 telephone conversation

Dear Mr. Nugent:

Here are my notes from out May 23 conversation.  I know I didn't capture
everything here.

On May 23, 2007, a telephone conversation took place between Mr. Keith
Barnett of the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency and Mr. Dan Nugent of
Buzzi Unicem USA, Inc.  The purpose of the conversation was to discuss
several site specific issues on the sampling of kiln feed and fuel
materials and cement kiln dust.

1.  Mr. Barnett conformed that cement kiln dust samples did not have to be
analyzed for total organic carbon.

2.  Mr Barnett confirmed that 2006 data were sufficient ( for something
here but I didn't record what)

3.  Facility with raw materials storage in a hall enclosure.  large
concrete bin with bottom reclaimed to raw mill.  Only opportunity to
sample is feed conveyer.  Mr Barnett confirmed this is acceptable.  I
think we also discussed getting representative samples from the piles?

4.  Facility has raw materials form several suppliers.  Stockpiled in a
storage area and stockpiles are mixed.  A mixed sample is acceptable.

5.  Facility with 4 long dry kilns.  All four get same fuel and feed.
Dust from PM control is commingled into common duct.   One set of samples
will be sufficient here.

6.  If a kilns runs only 8-20 hours per day two samples a day will be
sufficient.

Keith W. Barnett
USEPA/OAQPS/SPPD/MMG
Mail Code D243-02
Research Triangle Park, NC  27711
919-541-5605
barnett.keith@epa.gov


[Federal Register: April 16, 2009 (Volume 74, Number 72)]
[Notices]
[Page 17701-17702]
[DOCID:fr16ap09-84]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

[Release No. 34-59742; File No. SR-BX-2009-014]

Self-Regulatory Organizations; NASDAQ OMX BX, Inc.; Order
Approving a Proposed Rule Change Relating to Zero Bid Orders on the
Boston Options Exchange Facility

April 9, 2009.
    On February 26, 2009, NASDAQ OMX BX, Inc. (``Exchange'') filed with
the Securities and Exchange Commission (``Commission''), pursuant to
Section 19(b)(1) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (``Act'') \1\
and Rule 19b-4 thereunder,\2\ a proposed rule change relating to zero
bid orders on the Boston Options Exchange Facility. The proposed rule
change was published for comment in the Federal Register on March 6,
2009.\3\ The Commission received no comments on the proposal. This
order approves the proposal.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \1\ 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(1).
    \2\ 17 CFR 240.19b-4.
    \3\ See Securities Exchange Act Release No. 59475 (February 26,
2009), 74 FR 9830.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    The proposed rule change amends Chapter V, Section 14 of the Rules
of the Boston Options Exchange Group, LLC (``BOX'') to clarify the
treatment of Market Orders to sell and BOX-Top Orders to sell when the
highest bid on BOX is zero in the options series for a particular order
(``Zero Bid Order''). Currently, Section 14 states, in part, that:
``[i]n the case where the lowest offer for any options contract is
$.05, and an Options Participant enters a Market Order to sell that
series, any such Market Order shall be considered a Limit Order to sell
at a price of $.05.'' \4\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \4\ See Chapter V, Section 14 of the BOX Rules.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    The Exchange is amending Section 14 so that it will apply equally
to Market Orders to sell and BOX-Top Orders to sell when the highest
bid on BOX is zero in the options series. In this case such Zero Bid
Orders will be considered Limit Orders to sell at a price, above zero,
that is equal to the minimum trading increment applicable to that
particular options series.
    Consequently, where the BOX market displays a zero bid and the
options series is subject to the Penny Pilot Program,\5\ the Zero Bid
Order will be considered a Limit Order to sell at a price of $.01. If
the options series is not subject to the Penny Pilot Program, the Zero
Bid Order will be considered a Limit Order to sell at a price of $.05
or $.10, depending upon the minimum trading increment for the specific
options series of the Zero Bid Order. Further, if the resulting Limit
Order would cause either a locked or crossed market, then the original
Market Order or BOX-Top Order will be rejected by the Trading Host.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \5\ BOX may trade options contracts in one-cent increments in
certain approved issues through July 3, 2009, as part of the Penny
Pilot Program. See Securities Exchange Act Release No. 59629 (March
26, 2009), 74 FR 15021 (April 2, 2009) (SR-BX-2009-17).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    After careful review, the Commission finds that the proposed rule
change is consistent with the requirements of the Act and the rules and
regulations thereunder applicable to a national securities exchange \6\
and, in particular, the requirements of Section 6 of the Act.\7\
Specifically, the Commission finds that the proposal is consistent with
Section 6(b)(5) of the Act,\8\ in that the proposal has been designed
to promote just and equitable principles of trade, and to protect
investors and the public interest. The Commission believes that the
proposed rule change will provide greater clarification to market
participants regarding the handling of Zero Bid Orders on BOX. In
addition, the Commission believes that the proposal will benefit the
public interest by preventing locked or crossed markets in situations
where the Limit Order resulting from the Zero Bid Order would cause
such a lock or cross.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \6\ The Commission has considered the proposed rule change's
impact on efficiency, competition and capital formation. 15 U.S.C.
78c(f).
    \7\ 15 U.S.C. 78f.
    \8\ 15 U.S.C. 78f(b)(5).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    It is therefore ordered, pursuant to Section 19(b)(2) of the
Act,\9\ that the proposed rule change (SR-BX-2009-014) is approved.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \9\ 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(2).

---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    For the Commission, by the Division of Trading and Markets,
pursuant to delegated authority.\10\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \10\ 17 CFR 200.30-3(a)(12).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

Florence E. Harmon,
Deputy Secretary.
[FR Doc. E9-8737 Filed 4-15-09; 8:45 am]


[Federal Register Volume 81, Number 222 (Thursday, November 17, 2016)]
[Notices]
[Pages 81230-81233]
[FR Doc No: 2016-27649]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION

Federal Motor Carrier Safety Administration

[Docket No. FMCSA-1999-6480; FMCSA-2000-7006; FMCSA-2000-7165; FMCSA-
2002-12294; FMCSA-2002-13411; FMCSA-2004-17195; FMCSA-2006-24015;
FMCSA-2006-24783; FMCSA-2007-0017; FMCSA-2008-0021; FMCSA-2008-0106;
FMCSA-2008-0174; FMCSA-2008-0231; FMCSA-2009-0206; FMCSA-2010-0082;
FMCSA-2010-0114; FMCSA-2011-0142; FMCSA-2011-0276; FMCSA-2011-0299;
FMCSA-2012-0104; FMCSA-2012-0161; FMCSA-2012-0214; FMCSA-2013-0027;
FMCSA-2013-0166; FMCSA-2013-0168; FMCSA-2013-0170; FMCSA-2014-0002;
FMCSA-2014-0003; FMCSA-2014-0005; FMCSA-2014-0006; FMCSA-2014-0007;
FMCSA-2014-0008; FMCSA-2014-0010]

Qualification of Drivers; Exemption Applications; Vision

AGENCY: Federal Motor Carrier Safety Administration (FMCSA), DOT.

ACTION: Notice of renewal of exemptions; request for comments.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: FMCSA announces its decision to renew the exemptions from the
vision requirement in the Federal Motor Carrier Safety Regulations for
79 individuals. FMCSA has statutory authority to exempt individuals
from the vision requirement if the exemptions granted will not
compromise safety. The Agency has concluded that granting these
exemption renewals will provide a level of safety that is equivalent to
or greater than the level of safety maintained without the exemptions
for these commercial motor vehicle (CMV) drivers.

DATES: Each group of renewed exemptions are effective from the dates
stated in the discussions below. Comments must be received on or before
December 19, 2016.

ADDRESSES: You may submit comments bearing the Federal Docket
Management System (FDMS) numbers: [Docket No. FMCSA-1999-6480; FMCSA-
2000-7006; FMCSA-2000-7165; FMCSA-

2002-12294; FMCSA-2002-13411; FMCSA-2004-17195; FMCSA-2006-24015;
FMCSA-2006-24783; FMCSA-2007-0017; FMCSA-2008-0021; FMCSA-2008-0106;
FMCSA-2008-0174; FMCSA-2008-0231; FMCSA-2009-0206; FMCSA-2010-0082;
FMCSA-2010-0114; FMCSA-2011-0142; FMCSA-2011-0276; FMCSA-2011-0299;
FMCSA-2012-0104; FMCSA-2012-0161; FMCSA-2012-0214; FMCSA-2013-0027;
FMCSA-2013-0166; FMCSA-2013-0168; FMCSA-2013-0170; FMCSA-2014-0002;
FMCSA-2014-0003; FMCSA-2014-0005; FMCSA-2014-0006; FMCSA-2014-0007;
FMCSA-2014-0008; FMCSA-2014-0010], using any of the following methods:
     Federal eRulemaking Portal: Go to http://www.regulations.gov. Follow the on-line instructions for submitting
comments.
     Mail: Docket Management Facility; U.S. Department of
Transportation, 1200 New Jersey Avenue SE., West Building Ground Floor,
Room W12-140, Washington, DC 20590-0001.
     Hand Delivery or Courier: West Building Ground Floor, Room
W12-140, 1200 New Jersey Avenue SE., Washington, DC, between 9 a.m. and
5 p.m., Monday through Friday, except Federal Holidays.
     Fax: 1-202-493-2251.
    Instructions: Each submission must include the Agency name and the
docket number for this notice. Note that DOT posts all comments
received without change to http://www.regulations.gov, including any
personal information included in a comment. Please see the Privacy Act
heading below.
    Docket: For access to the docket to read background documents or
comments, go to http://www.regulations.gov at any time or Room W12-140
on the ground level of the West Building, 1200 New Jersey Avenue SE.,
Washington, DC, between 9 a.m. and 5 p.m., Monday through Friday,
except Federal holidays. The Federal Docket Management System (FDMS) is
available 24 hours each day, 365 days each year. If you want
acknowledgment that we received your comments, please include a self-
addressed, stamped envelope or postcard or print the acknowledgement
page that appears after submitting comments on-line.
    Privacy Act: Anyone may search the electronic form of all comments
received into any of our dockets by the name of the individual
submitting the comment (or of the person signing the comment, if
submitted on behalf of an association, business, labor union, etc.).
You may review DOT's Privacy Act Statement for the Federal Docket
Management System (FDMS) published in the Federal Register on January
17, 2008 (73 FR 3316).

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Ms. Christine A. Hydock, Chief,
Medical Programs Division, Medical Programs Division,<PHONE_NUMBER>,
<EMAIL_ADDRESS>FMCSA, Department of Transportation, 1200 New
Jersey Avenue SE., Room W64-224, Washington, DC 20590-0001. Office
hours are from 8:30 a.m. to 5 p.m. Monday through Friday, except
Federal holidays.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

Background

    Under 49 U.S.C. 31136(e) and 31315, FMCSA may renew an exemption
from the vision requirements in 49 CFR 391.41(b)(10), which applies to
drivers of CMVs in interstate commerce, for a two-year period if it
finds ``such exemption would likely achieve a level of safety that is
equivalent to or greater than the level that would be achieved absent
such exemption.'' The procedures for requesting an exemption (including
renewals) are set out in 49 CFR part 381.

Exemption Decision

    This notice addresses 79 individuals who have requested renewal of
their exemptions in accordance with FMCSA procedures. FMCSA has
evaluated these 79 applications for renewal on their merits and decided
to extend each exemption for a renewable two-year period. Each
individual is identified according to the renewal date.
    The exemptions are extended subject to the following conditions:
(1) That each individual has a physical examination every year (a) by
an ophthalmologist or optometrist who attests that the vision in the
better eye continues to meet the requirements in 49 CFR 391.41(b)(10),
and (b) by a medical examiner who attests that the individual is
otherwise physically qualified under 49 CFR 391.41; (2) that each
individual provides a copy of the ophthalmologist's or optometrist's
report to the medical examiner at the time of the annual medical
examination; and (3) that each individual provide a copy of the annual
medical certification to the employer for retention in the driver's
qualification file and retains a copy of the certification on his/her
person while driving for presentation to a duly authorized Federal,
State, or local enforcement official. Each exemption will be valid for
two years unless rescinded earlier by FMCSA. The exemption will be
rescinded if: (1) The person fails to comply with the terms and
conditions of the exemption; (2) the exemption has resulted in a lower
level of safety than was maintained before it was granted; or (3)
continuation of the exemption would not be consistent with the goals
and objectives of 49 U.S.C. 31136(e) and 31315.

Basis for Renewing Exemptions

    Under 49 U.S.C. 31315(b)(1), an exemption may be granted for no
longer than two years from its approval date and may be renewed upon
application for additional two year periods. The following group(s) of
drivers will receive renewed exemptions effective in the month of
September and are discussed below.
    As of September 9, 2016, and in accordance with 49 U.S.C. 31136(e)
and 31315, the following 41 individuals have satisfied the conditions
for obtaining a renewed exemption from the vision requirements (64 FR
68195; 65 FR 20251; 67 FR 38311; 67 FR 46016; 67 FR 57267; 67 FR 76439;
68 FR 10298; 69 FR 17263; 69 FR 26921; 69 FR 31447; 69 FR 51346; 70 FR
44946; 71 FR 14566; 71 FR 16410; 71 FR 27033; 71 FR 30227; 71 FR 32184;
71 FR 41311; 71 FR 50970; 72 FR 67340; 73 FR 1395; 73 FR 15567; 73 FR
15568; 73 FR 27014; 73 FR 27015; 73 FR 27017; 73 FR 28186; 73 FR 35197;
73 FR 35199; 73 FR 36955; 73 FR 38499; 73 FR 42403; 73 FR 48270; 73 FR
48273; 73 FR 48275; 74 FR 43217; 74 FR 57551; 75 FR 19674; 75 FR 25917;
75 FR 25919; 75 FR 27623; 75 FR 27624; 75 FR 34212; 75 FR 36779; 75 FR
38602; 75 FR 39729; 75 FR 44051; 75 FR 47888; 75 FR 50799; 76 FR 49528;
76 FR 61143; 76 FR 66123; 76 FR 67248; 76 FR 73769; 76 FR 79761; 77 FR
3547; 77 FR 23797; 77 FR 27847; 77 FR 36338; 77 FR 38384; 77 FR 38386;
77 FR 40945; 77 FR 40946; 77 FR 41879; 77 FR 46153; 77 FR 48590; 77 FR
52391; 78 FR 24798; 78 FR 46407; 78 FR 62935; 78 FR 63302; 78 FR 67454;
78 FR 67460; 78 FR 76395; 78 FR 76705; 78 FR 77780; 78 FR 77782; 79 FR
4803; 79 FR 10606; 79 FR 14331; 79 FR 14571; 79 FR 22003; 79 FR 23797;
79 FR 79 27681; 79 FR 28588; 79 FR 29495; 79 FR 35212; 79 FR 35218; 79
FR 35220; 79 FR 37842; 79 FR 38649; 79 FR 38659; 79 FR 41735; 79 FR
41737; 79 FR 45868; 79 FR 46153; 79 FR 47175; 79 FR 53514; 79 FR
56102):
    Don R. Alexander (OR), Paul J. Bannon (DE), Frank R. Berritto (NY),
Timothy W. Bickford (ME), Christopher D. Bolomey (ME), Thomas J. Bommer
(ND), Tracy L. Bowers (IA), Tracy L. Butcher (VA), Clare H. Buxton
(MI), Thomas L. Corey (IN), Layne C. Coscorrosa (WA), James H. Facemyre
(WV), Anton Filic (TX), Raleigh K. Franklin (UT), Michael Giagnacova

(PA), Brian C. Hagen (IL), Jeffrey M. Hall (AL), George M. Hapchuk
(PA), Clarence K. Hill (NC), Michael J. Hoffarth (WA), Brandon S.
Langston (WY), Ronnie R. Lockamy (NC), Michael G. Martin (CT), Bobby L.
Mashburn (GA), Shane N. Maul (IN), Larry McCoy, Sr. (OH), Jeremy L.
Miller (OR), Aaron L. Paustian (IA), Daniel S. Rebstad (FL), Kenneth R.
Riener (MT), Terry L. Rubendall (PA), Benjamin R. Sauder (PA), James C.
Sharp (PA), Robert F. Skinner, Jr. (NY), Robert Smiley (NM), Wolfgang
V. Spekis (MD), Leon F. Stephens (CO), Patrick D. Talley (SC), George
R. Tieskoetter (IA), Bert M. Valiante (CT), James W. Van Ryswyk (IA).
    The drivers were included in one of the following dockets: Docket
Nos. FMCSA-1999-6480; FMCSA-2002-12294; FMCSA-2002-13411; FMCSA-2004-
17195; FMCSA-2006-24015; FMCSA-2006-24783; FMCSA-2007-0017; FMCSA-2008-
0021; FMCSA-2008-0106; FMCSA-2008-0174; FMCSA-2009-0206; FMCSA-2010-
0082; FMCSA-2010-0114; FMCSA-2011-0142; FMCSA-2011-0276; FMCSA-2011-
0299; FMCSA-2012-0104; FMCSA-2012-0161; FMCSA-2013-0027; FMCSA-2013-
0166; FMCSA-2013-0168; FMCSA-2013-0170; FMCSA-2014-0002; FMCSA-2014-
0003; FMCSA-2014-0005; FMCSA-2014-0006; FMCSA-2014-0007; FMCSA-2014-
0008. Their exemptions are effective as of September 9, 2016 and will
expire on September 9, 2018.
    As of September 21, 2016, and in accordance with 49 U.S.C. 31136(e)
and 31315, the following 17 individuals have satisfied the conditions
for obtaining a renewed exemption from the vision requirements (65 FR
20245; 65 FR 33406; 65 FR 57230; 65 FR 57234; 67 FR 46016; 67 FR 57266;
67 FR 57267; 69 FR 51346; 69 FR 52741; 71 FR 32185; 71 FR 41311; 71 FR
50970; 71 FR 53489; 73 FR 42403; 73 FR 48270; 73 FR 51336; 75 FR 34210;
75 FR 47888; 75 FR 50799; 75 FR 52062; 77 FR 40945; 77 FR 52389; 79 FR
46300):
    Jack D. Clodfelter (NC), Tommy J. Cross, Jr. (TN), Daniel K. Davis,
III (MA), Richard L. Derick (NH), Joseph A. Dunlap (OH), James F.
Gereau (WI), Esteban G. Gonzalez (TX), Reginald I. Hall (TX), George R.
House (MO), Alfred C. Jewell, Jr. (WY), John C. Lewis (SC), Lewis V.
McNeice (TX), Kevin J. O'Donnell (IL), Gregory M. Preves (GA), Daniel
Salinas (OR), Lee R. Sidwell (OH), Jeffrey D. Wilson (CO).
    The drivers were included in one of the following dockets: Docket
No. FMCSA-2000-7006; FMCSA-2000-7165; FMCSA-2002-12294; FMCSA-2006-
24783; FMCSA-2010-0114. Their exemptions are effective as of September
21, 2016 and will expire on September 21, 2018.
    As of September 23, 2016, and in accordance with 49 U.S.C. 31136(e)
and 31315, the following 5 individuals have satisfied the conditions
for obtaining a renewed exemption from the vision requirements (73 FR
46973; 73 FR 54888; 75 FR 52063; 77 FR 52388; 79 FR 52388):
    Terrence L. Benning (WI), Larry D. Curry (GA), Kelly M. Greene
(FL), Garry R. Lomen (WA), Thomas P. Shank (NY).
    The drivers were included on the following docket: Docket No.
FMCSA-2008-0231. Their exemptions are effective as of September 23,
2016 and will expire on September 23, 2018.
    As of September 26, 2016, and in accordance with 49 U.S.C. 31136(e)
and 31315, the following 6 individuals have satisfied the conditions
for obtaining a renewed exemption from the vision requirements (77 FR
46793; 77 FR 59245):
    Bryan Brockus (ID), Michael T. Dekorte (MI), Erric L. Gomersall
(WI), Larry Johnsonbaugh, Jr. (PA), John Middleton (OH), John C.
Steedley (GA).
    The drivers were included on the following docket: Docket No.
FMCSA-2012-0214. Their exemptions are effective as of September 26,
2016 and will expire on September 26, 2018.
    As of September 30, 2016, and in accordance with 49 U.S.C. 31136(e)
and 31315, the following 10 individuals have satisfied the conditions
for obtaining a renewed exemption from the vision requirements (63 FR
66227; 64 FR 16520; 71 FR 14567; 71 FR 30228; 73 FR 28187; 73 FR 35195;
73 FR 35196; 73 FR 35197; 73 FR 35198; 73 FR 35199; 73 FR 35200; 73 FR
35201; 73 FR 38497; 38498; 73 FR 38499; 73 FR 48273; 73 FR 48275; 74 FR
37299; 74 FR 48344; 75 FR 25919; 75 FR 39729; 75 FR 44051; 77 FR 40946;
77 FR 46153; 79 FR 46153):
    Ronald A. Bolyard (WV), David A. Coburn, Sr. (VT), Ronald
Holshouser (MO), Kelly R. Knopf, Sr. (SC), Edward J. Kosior (NY),
Frazier A. Luckerson (GA), Ross A. Miceli II (PA), Donald L. Minney
(OH), Philip L. Neff (PA), Loran J. Weiler (IA).
    The drivers were included on the following docket: Docket No.
FMCSA-2014-0010. Their exemptions are effective as of September 30,
2016 and will expire on September 30, 2018.
    Each of the 79 applicants listed in the groups above has requested
renewal of the exemption and has submitted evidence showing that the
vision in the better eye continues to meet the requirement specified at
49 CFR 391.41(b)(10) and that the vision impairment is stable. In
addition, a review of each record of safety while driving with the
respective vision deficiencies over the past two years indicates each
applicant continues to meet the vision exemption requirements.
    These factors provide an adequate basis for predicting each
driver's ability to continue to drive safely in interstate commerce.
Therefore, FMCSA concludes that extending the exemption for each
renewal applicant for a period of two years is likely to achieve a
level of safety equal to that existing without the exemption.

Request for Comments

    FMCSA will review comments received at any time concerning a
particular driver's safety record and determine if the continuation of
the exemption is consistent with the requirements at 49 U.S.C. 31136(e)
and 31315. However, FMCSA requests that interested parties with
specific data concerning the safety records of these drivers submit
comments by December 19, 2016.
    FMCSA believes that the requirements for a renewal of an exemption
under 49 U.S.C. 31136(e) and 31315 can be satisfied by initially
granting the renewal and then requesting and evaluating, if needed,
subsequent comments submitted by interested parties. As indicated
above, the Agency previously published notices of final disposition
announcing its decision to exempt these 79 individuals from the vision
requirement in 49 CFR 391.41(b)(10). The final decision to grant an
exemption to each of these individuals was made on the merits of each
case and made only after careful consideration of the comments received
to its notices of applications. The notices of applications stated in
detail the qualifications, experience, and medical condition of each
applicant for an exemption from the vision requirements. That
information is available by consulting the above cited Federal Register
publications.
    Interested parties or organizations possessing information that
would otherwise show that any, or all, of these drivers are not
currently achieving the statutory level of safety should immediately
notify FMCSA. The Agency will evaluate any adverse evidence submitted
and, if safety is being compromised or if continuation of the exemption
would not be consistent with the goals and objectives of 49 U.S.C.
31136(e) and 31315, FMCSA will take immediate steps to revoke the
exemption of a driver.

Submitting Comments

    You may submit your comments and material online or by fax, mail,
or hand delivery, but please use only one of these means. FMCSA
recommends that you include your name and a mailing address, an email
address, or a phone number in the body of your document so that FMCSA
can contact you if there are questions regarding your submission.
    To submit your comment online, go to http://www.regulations.gov and
in the search box insert the docket numbers FMCSA-1999-6480; FMCSA-
2000-7006; FMCSA-2000-7165; FMCSA-2002-12294; FMCSA-2002-13411; FMCSA-
2004-17195; FMCSA-2006-24015; FMCSA-2006-24783; FMCSA-2007-0017; FMCSA-
2008-0021; FMCSA-2008-0106; FMCSA-2008-0174; FMCSA-2008-0231; FMCSA-
2009-0206; FMCSA-2010-0082; FMCSA-2010-0114; FMCSA-2011-0142; FMCSA-
2011-0276; FMCSA-2011-0299; FMCSA-2012-0104; FMCSA-2012-0161; FMCSA-
2012-0214; FMCSA-2013-0027; FMCSA-2013-0166; FMCSA-2013-0168; FMCSA-
2013-0170; FMCSA-2014-0002; FMCSA-2014-0003; FMCSA-2014-0005; FMCSA-
2014-0006; FMCSA-2014-0007; FMCSA-2014-0008; FMCSA-2014-0010 and click
the search button. When the new screen appears, click on the blue
``Comment Now!'' button on the right hand side of the page. On the new
page, enter information required including the specific section of this
document to which each comment applies, and provide a reason for each
suggestion or recommendation. If you submit your comments by mail or
hand delivery, submit them in an unbound format, no larger than 8\1/2\
by 11 inches, suitable for copying and electronic filing. If you submit
comments by mail and would like to know that they reached the facility,
please enclose a stamped, self-addressed postcard or envelope.
    We will consider all comments and material received during the
comment period. FMCSA may issue a final rule at any time after the
close of the comment period.

Viewing Comments and Documents

    To view comments, as well as any documents mentioned in this
preamble, go to http://www.regulations.gov and in the search box insert
the docket number FMCSA-1999-6480; FMCSA-2000-7006; FMCSA-2000-7165;
FMCSA-2002-12294; FMCSA-2002-13411; FMCSA-2004-17195; FMCSA-2006-24015;
FMCSA-2006-24783; FMCSA-2007-0017; FMCSA-2008-0021; FMCSA-2008-0106;
FMCSA-2008-0174; FMCSA-2008-0231; FMCSA-2009-0206; FMCSA-2010-0082;
FMCSA-2010-0114; FMCSA-2011-0142; FMCSA-2011-0276; FMCSA-2011-0299;
FMCSA-2012-0104; FMCSA-2012-0161; FMCSA-2012-0214; FMCSA-2013-0027;
FMCSA-2013-0166; FMCSA-2013-0168; FMCSA-2013-0170; FMCSA-2014-0002;
FMCSA-2014-0003; FMCSA-2014-0005; FMCSA-2014-0006; FMCSA-2014-0007;
FMCSA-2014-0008; FMCSA-2014-0010 and click ``Search.'' Next, click
``Open Docket Folder'' and you will find all documents and comments
related to this notice.

    Issued on: November 8, 2016.
 Larry W. Minor,
Associate Administrator for Policy.
[FR Doc. 2016-27649 Filed 11-16-16; 8:45 am]
 BILLING CODE 4910-EX-P


[Federal Register Volume 79, Number 164 (Monday, August 25, 2014)]
[Notices]
[Pages 50682-50683]
[FR Doc No: 2014-20147]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY

Federal Emergency Management Agency

[Docket ID FEMA-2014-0002; Internal Agency Docket No. FEMA-B-1430]

Changes in Flood Hazard Determinations

AGENCY: Federal Emergency Management Agency, DHS.

ACTION: Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: This notice lists communities where the addition or
modification of Base Flood Elevations (BFEs), base flood depths,
Special Flood Hazard Area (SFHA) boundaries or zone designations, or
the regulatory floodway (hereinafter referred to as flood hazard
determinations), as shown on the Flood Insurance Rate Maps (FIRMs), and
where applicable, in the supporting Flood Insurance Study (FIS)
reports, prepared by the Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA) for
each community, is appropriate because of new scientific or technical
data. The FIRM, and where applicable, portions of the FIS report, have
been revised to reflect these flood hazard determinations through
issuance of a Letter of Map Revision (LOMR), in accordance with Title
44, Part 65 of the Code of Federal Regulations (44 CFR Part 65). The
LOMR will be used by insurance agents and others to calculate
appropriate flood insurance premium rates for new buildings and the
contents of those buildings. For rating purposes, the currently
effective community number is shown in the table below and must be used
for all new policies and renewals.

DATES: These flood hazard determinations will become effective on the
dates listed in the table below and revise the FIRM panels and FIS
report in effect prior to this determination for the listed
communities.
    From the date of the second publication of notification of these
changes in a newspaper of local circulation, any person has ninety (90)
days in which to request through the community that the Deputy
Associate Administrator for Mitigation reconsider the changes. The
flood hazard determination information may be changed during the 90-day
period.

ADDRESSES: The affected communities are listed in the table below.
Revised flood hazard information for each community is available for
inspection at both the online location and the respective community map
repository address listed in the table below. Additionally, the current
effective FIRM and FIS report for each community are accessible online
through the FEMA Map Service Center at www.msc.fema.gov for comparison.
    Submit comments and/or appeals to the Chief Executive Officer of
the community as listed in the table below.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Luis Rodriguez, Chief, Engineering
Management Branch, Federal Insurance and Mitigation Administration,
FEMA, 500 C Street SW., Washington, DC 20472,<PHONE_NUMBER>, or
(email<EMAIL_ADDRESS>or visit the FEMA Map Information
eXchange (FMIX) online at www.floodmaps.fema.gov/fhm/fmx_main.html.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The specific flood hazard determinations are
not described for each community in this notice. However, the online
location and local community map repository address where the flood
hazard determination information is available for inspection is
provided.
    Any request for reconsideration of flood hazard determinations must
be submitted to the Chief Executive Officer of the community as listed
in the table below.
    The modifications are made pursuant to section 201 of the Flood
Disaster

Protection Act of 1973, 42 U.S.C. 4105, and are in accordance with the
National Flood Insurance Act of 1968, 42 U.S.C. 4001 et seq., and with
44 CFR Part 65.
    The FIRM and FIS report are the basis of the floodplain management
measures that the community is required either to adopt or to show
evidence of having in effect in order to qualify or remain qualified
for participation in the National Flood Insurance Program (NFIP).
    These flood hazard determinations, together with the floodplain
management criteria required by 44 CFR 60.3, are the minimum that are
required. They should not be construed to mean that the community must
change any existing ordinances that are more stringent in their
floodplain management requirements. The community may at any time enact
stricter requirements of its own or pursuant to policies established by
other Federal, State, or regional entities. The flood hazard
determinations are in accordance with 44 CFR 65.4.
    The affected communities are listed in the following table. Flood
hazard determination information for each community is available for
inspection at both the online location and the respective community map
repository address listed in the table below. Additionally, the current
effective FIRM and FIS report for each community are accessible online
through the FEMA Map Service Center at www.msc.fema.gov for comparison.

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
                                                                                Online location
       State and county         Location and case      Chief executive       Community map    of Letter of Map       Effective date of        Community
                                       No.          officer of community       repository         Revision              modification             No.
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
California:
    Orange....................  City of Seal       The Honorable Gordon    211 8th Street,    http://           November 28, 2014..........       060233
                                 Beach (14-09-      A. Shanks, Mayor,       Seal Beach, CA     www.msc.fema
                                 2974P).            City of Seal Beach,     90740.             .gov/lomc.
                                                    211 8th Street, Seal
                                                    Beach, CA 90740.
    Orange....................  Unincorporated     Mr. Michael B.          300 North Flower   http://           November 28, 2014..........       060212
                                 Areas of Orange    Giancola, Executive     Street, Santa      www.msc.fema
                                 County (14-09-     Officer, Orange         Ana, CA 92703.     .gov/lomc.
                                 2974).             County, 333 West
                                                    Santa Ana Boulevard,
                                                    Santa Ana, CA 92701.
Connecticut: Litchfield.......  Town of New        The Honorable Patricia  Town Hall, 10      http://           November 24, 2014..........       090049
                                 Milford (14-01-    A. Murphy, Mayor,       Main Street, New   www.msc.fema
                                 0106P).            Town of New Milford,    Milford, CT        .gov/lomc.
                                                    10 Main Street, New     06776.
                                                    Milford, CT 06776.
Indiana:
    Adams.....................  Town of Geneva     The Honorable Richard   411 East Line      http://           November 20, 2014..........       180002
                                 (13-05-6773P).     Clutters, Town          Street, Geneva,    www.msc.fema
                                                    Council President,      IN 46740.          .gov/lomc.
                                                    Town of Geneva, 411
                                                    East Line Street,
                                                    Geneva, IN 46740.
    Adams.....................  Unincorporated     The Honorable Doug      112 South Second   http://           November 20, 2014..........       180424
                                 Areas of Adams     Bauman, Commissioner,   Street, Decatur,   www.msc.fema
                                 County (13-05-     Adams County, 2510      IN 46733.          .gov/lomc.
                                 6773P).            West State Road 116,
                                                    Geneva, IN 46740.
    Boone.....................  Town of            The Honorable Jeff      Town Hall, 1100    http://           December 4, 2014...........       180016
                                 Zionsville (14-    Papa, Town Council      West Oak Street,   www.msc.fema
                                 05-3105P).         President, Town of      Zionsville, IN     .gov/lomc.
                                                    Zionsville, 1100 West   46077.
                                                    Oak Street,
                                                    Zionsville, IN 46077.
Minnesota: Polk...............  City of Crookston  The Honorable David W.  City Hall, 124     http://           November 14, 2014..........       270364
                                 (13-05-7394P).     Genereux, Mayor, City   North Broadway,    www.msc.fema
                                                    of Crookston, 124       Crookston, MN      .gov/lomc.
                                                    North Broadway,         56716.
                                                    Crookston, MN 56716.
Wisconsin:
    Kenosha...................  City of Kenosha    The Honorable Keith G.  625 52nd Street,   http://           November 4, 2014...........       550209
                                 (14-05-2047P).     Bosman, Mayor, City     Room 308,          www.msc.fema
                                                    of Kenosha, 625 52nd    Kenosha, WI        .gov/lomc.
                                                    Street, Room 300,       53140.
                                                    Kenosha, WI 53140.
    Ozaukee...................  City of Mequon     The Honorable Dan       11333 North        http://           November 28, 2014..........       555564
                                 (14-05-4216P).     Abendroth, Mayor,       Cedarburg Road,    www.msc.fema
                                                    City of Mequon, 11333   Mequon, WI 53092.  .gov/lomc.
                                                    North Cedarburg Road,
                                                    Mequon, WI 53092.
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

(Catalog of Federal Domestic Assistance No. 97.022, ``Flood
Insurance.'')

     Dated: August 4, 2014.
Roy E. Wright,
Deputy Associate Administrator for Mitigation, Department of Homeland
Security, Federal Emergency Management Agency.
[FR Doc. 2014-20147 Filed 8-22-14; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 9110-12-P


[Federal Register: March 11, 2010 (Volume 75, Number 47)]
[Notices]
[Page 11532]
[DOCID:fr11mr10-45]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission

[Docket No. ER10-790-000]

El Cajon Energy, LLC; Supplemental Notice That Initial Market-
Based Rate Filing Includes Request for Blanket Section 204
Authorization

March 4, 2010.
    This is a supplemental notice in the above-referenced proceeding of
El Cajon Energy, LLC's application for market-based rate authority,
with an accompanying rate tariff, noting that such application includes
a request for blanket authorization, under 18 CFR part 34, of future
issuances of securities and assumptions of liability.
    Any person desiring to intervene or to protest should file with the
Federal Energy Regulatory Commission, 888 First Street, NE.,
Washington, DC 20426, in accordance with Rules 211 and 214 of the
Commission's Rules of Practice and Procedure (18 CFR 385.211 and
385.214). Anyone filing a motion to intervene or protest must serve a
copy of that document on the Applicant.
    Notice is hereby given that the deadline for filing protests with
regard to the applicant's request for blanket authorization, under 18
CFR part 34, of future issuances of securities and assumptions of
liability, is March 24, 2010.
    The Commission encourages electronic submission of protests and
interventions in lieu of paper, using the FERC Online links at http://
www.ferc.gov. To facilitate electronic service, persons with Internet
access who will eFile a document and/or be listed as a contact for an
intervenor must create and validate an eRegistration account using the
eRegistration link. Select the eFiling link to log on and submit the
intervention or protests.
    Persons unable to file electronically should submit an original and
14 copies of the intervention or protest to the Federal Energy
Regulatory Commission, 888 First Street, NE., Washington, DC 20426.
    The filings in the above-referenced proceeding are accessible in
the Commission's eLibrary system by clicking on the appropriate link in
the above list.
    They are also available for review in the Commission's Public
Reference Room in Washington, DC. There is an eSubscription link on the
Web site that enables subscribers to receive e-mail notification when a
document is added to a subscribed dockets(s). For assistance with any
FERC Online service, please e-mail<EMAIL_ADDRESS>or call
(866) 208-3676 (toll free). For TTY, call<PHONE_NUMBER>.

Kimberly D. Bose,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2010-5206 Filed 3-10-10; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6717-01-P


[Federal Register Volume 83, Number 191 (Tuesday, October 2, 2018)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Pages 49475-49482]
[FR Doc No: 2018-21347]

=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION

Federal Aviation Administration

14 CFR Part 39

[Docket No. FAA-2018-0804; Product Identifier 2018-NM-129-AD; Amendment
39-19442; AD 2018-20-08]
RIN 2120-AA64

Airworthiness Directives; Airbus SAS Airplanes

AGENCY: Federal Aviation Administration (FAA), Department of
Transportation (DOT).

ACTION: Final rule; request for comments.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: We are superseding Airworthiness Directive (AD) 2018-02-18,
which applied to certain Airbus SAS Model A318, A319, and A320 series
airplanes and Model A321-111, -112, -131, -211, -212, -213, -231, and -
232 airplanes. AD 2018-02-18 required revising the airplane flight
manual (AFM) to provide guidance to the flightcrew for certain
emergency procedures. This new AD requires revising the AFM, and for
certain airplanes, removing a certain AFM revision. This AD also adds
airplanes to the applicability. This AD was prompted by a determination
that, when two angle of attack (AoA) sensors are adversely affected by
icing conditions at the same time, data displayed on the back up speed
scale (BUSS) could be erroneous. This AD was also prompted by a
determination that the AFM needs to be revised for certain additional
airplanes, and that the AFM may have been erroneously revised on
certain airplanes not equipped with a BUSS function. We are issuing
this AD to address the unsafe condition on these products.

DATES: This AD is effective October 17, 2018.
    We must receive comments on this AD by November 16, 2018.

ADDRESSES: You may send comments, using the procedures found in 14 CFR
11.43 and 11.45, by any of the following methods:
     Federal eRulemaking Portal: Go to http://www.regulations.gov. Follow the instructions for submitting comments.
     Fax:<PHONE_NUMBER>.
     Mail: U.S. Department of Transportation, Docket
Operations, M-30, West Building Ground Floor, Room W12-140, 1200 New
Jersey Avenue SE, Washington, DC 20590.
     Hand Delivery: U.S. Department of Transportation, Docket
Operations, M-30, West Building Ground Floor, Room W12-140, 1200 New
Jersey Avenue SE, Washington, DC, between 9 a.m. and 5 p.m., Monday
through Friday, except Federal holidays.
    For service information identified in this final rule, contact
Airbus SAS, Airworthiness Office--EIAS, Rond-Point Emile Dewoitine No:
2, 31700 Blagnac Cedex, France; telephone +33 5 61 93 36 96; fax +33 5
61 93 44 51; email [email protected]; internet http://www.airbus.com. You may view this referenced service information at the
FAA, Transport Standards Branch, 2200 South 216th St., Des Moines, WA.
For information on the availability of this material at the FAA, call
206-231-3195. It is also available on the internet at http://www.regulations.gov by searching for and locating Docket No. FAA-2018-
0804.

Examining the AD Docket

    You may examine the AD docket on the internet at http://www.regulations.gov by searching for and locating Docket No. FAA-2018-
0804; or in person at the Docket Management Facility between 9 a.m. and
5 p.m., Monday through Friday, except Federal holidays. The AD docket
contains this AD, the regulatory evaluation, any comments received, and
other information. The street address for the Docket Operations office
(telephone<PHONE_NUMBER>) is in the ADDRESSES section. Comments will be
available in the AD docket shortly after receipt.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Sanjay Ralhan, Aerospace Engineer,
International Section, Transport Standards Branch, FAA, 2200 South
216th St., Des Moines, WA 98351; telephone and fax<PHONE_NUMBER>.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

Discussion

    We issued AD 2018-02-18, Amendment 39-19171 (83 FR 5182, February
6, 2018) (``AD 2018-02-18''), which applied to certain Airbus SAS Model
A318, A319, and A320 series airplanes and Model A321-111, -112, -131, -
211, -212, -213, -231, and -232 airplanes. AD 2018-02-18 was prompted
by a determination that when two AoA sensors are adversely affected by
icing conditions at the same time, data displayed on the BUSS could be
erroneous. AD 2018-02-18 required revising the AFM to provide guidance
to the flightcrew for emergency procedures when erroneous airspeed
indications are displayed on the BUSS. We issued AD 2018-02-18 to
address erroneous airspeed data displays, which could lead to an
increased flightcrew workload, possibly resulting in reduced control of
the airplane.
    Since we issued AD 2018-02-18, we have determined that airplanes on
which Airbus Service Bulletin A320-34-1543 was embodied in service are
also subject to the unsafe condition, and that the AFM may have been
erroneously revised on certain airplanes not equipped with a BUSS
function.
    The European Aviation Safety Agency (EASA), which is the Technical
Agent for the Member States of the European Union, has issued EASA AD
2018-0189, dated August 30, 2018 (referred to after this as the
Mandatory Continuing Airworthiness Information, or ``the MCAI''), to
correct an unsafe condition for all Airbus SAS Model A318, A319, and
A320 series airplanes and Model A321-111, -112, -131, -211, -212, -213,
-231, and -232 airplanes. The MCAI states:

    In extreme icing conditions, pitot probes may induce erroneous
airspeed indications. To provide flight crews with reliable
information on airspeed, Airbus developed a Back-up Speed Scale
(BUSS and reversible BUSS, based on angle of attack (AoA) value)
displayed on the Primary Flight Display (PFD), together with a PFD
Back-Up Altitude Scale based on Global Positioning System (GPS)
altitude. This BUSS function is intended to be used below flight
level (FL) 250 only. Following new investigation related to AoA
probes blockages, it was identified that, when two AoA sensors are
adversely affected by icing conditions at the same time, data
displayed on the BUSS could be erroneous.
    This condition, if not corrected, could lead to an increased
flight crew workload, possibly resulting in reduced control of the
aeroplane.

    To address this potential unsafe condition, Airbus established
specific operational instructions to be applied by the flight crew
under certain defined conditions. The relevant procedure was
incorporated into the applicable A320 family AFM [airplane flight
manual] since 07 March 2017 (publication date). Consequently, EASA
issued AD 2017-0257 (later revised) to require a one-time AFM
amendment to introduce the additional operational procedure.
    Since EASA AD 2017-0257R1 [which corresponds to FAA AD 2018-02-
18] was issued, it was determined that aeroplanes on which Airbus SB
[service bulletin] A320-34-1543 (mod 154033) was embodied in service
were inadvertently missing from the Applicability of the [EASA] AD.
    For the reason described above, this [EASA] AD retains the
requirements of EASA AD 2017-0257R1, which is superseded, and
extends the Applicability to aeroplanes that embody Airbus SB A320-
34-1543. This AD also requires removal of the AFM amendment, where
it was mistakenly inserted in the AFM of an aeroplane not equipped
with the BUSS function, prompted by the Applicability definition and
requirements of EASA AD 2017-0257 at original issue.

    You may examine the MCAI on the internet at http://www.regulations.gov by searching for and locating Docket No. FAA-2018-
0804.

FAA's Determination and Requirements of This AD

    This product has been approved by the aviation authority of another
country, and is approved for operation in the United States. Pursuant
to our bilateral agreement with the State of Design Authority, we have
been notified of the unsafe condition described in the MCAI and service
information referenced above. We are issuing this AD because we
evaluated all pertinent information and determined the unsafe condition
exists and is likely to exist or develop on other products of the same
type design.

FAA's Justification and Determination of the Effective Date

    An unsafe condition exists that requires the immediate adoption of
this AD without providing an opportunity for public comments prior to
adoption. The FAA has found that the risk to the flying public
justifies waiving notice and comment prior to adoption of this rule
because when two AoA sensors are adversely affected by icing conditions
at the same time, data displayed on the BUSS could be erroneous,
leading to an increased flightcrew workload that could ultimately
result in reduced control of the airplane. Therefore, we find good
cause that notice and opportunity for prior public comment are
impracticable. In addition, for the reason(s) stated above, we find
that good cause exists for making this amendment effective in less than
30 days.

Comments Invited

    This AD is a final rule that involves requirements affecting flight
safety, and we did not precede it by notice and opportunity for public
comment. We invite you to send any written relevant data, views, or
arguments about this AD. Send your comments to an address listed under
the ADDRESSES section. Include ``Docket No. FAA-2018-0804; Product
Identifier 2018-NM-129-AD'' at the beginning of your comments. We
specifically invite comments on the overall regulatory, economic,
environmental, and energy aspects of this AD. We will consider all
comments received by the closing date and may amend this AD because of
those comments.
    We will post all comments we receive, without change, to http://www.regulations.gov, including any personal information you provide. We
will also post a report summarizing each substantive verbal contact we
receive about this AD.

Costs of Compliance

    We estimate that this AD affects 1,250 airplanes of U.S. registry.
    We estimate the following costs to comply with this AD:

                                      Estimated Costs for Required Actions
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
                                                                                Cost per      Cost on  U.S.
                          Labor cost                              Parts cost        product         operators
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
1 work-hour x $85 per hour = $85.............................              $0              $85         $106,250
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Authority for This Rulemaking

    Title 49 of the United States Code specifies the FAA's authority to
issue rules on aviation safety. Subtitle I, section 106, describes the
authority of the FAA Administrator. Subtitle VII: Aviation Programs,
describes in more detail the scope of the Agency's authority.
    We are issuing this rulemaking under the authority described in
Subtitle VII, Part A, Subpart III, Section 44701: ``General
requirements.'' Under that section, Congress charges the FAA with
promoting safe flight of civil aircraft in air commerce by prescribing
regulations for practices, methods, and procedures the Administrator
finds necessary for safety in air commerce. This regulation is within
the scope of that authority because it addresses an unsafe condition
that is likely to exist or develop on products identified in this
rulemaking action.
    This AD is issued in accordance with authority delegated by the
Executive Director, Aircraft Certification Service, as authorized by
FAA Order 8000.51C. In accordance with that order, issuance of ADs is
normally a function of the Compliance and Airworthiness Division, but
during this transition period, the Executive Director has delegated the
authority to issue ADs applicable to transport category airplanes and
associated appliances to the Director of the System Oversight Division.

Regulatory Findings

    We determined that this AD will not have federalism implications
under Executive Order 13132. This AD will not have a substantial direct
effect on the States, on the relationship between the national
government and the States, or on the distribution of power and
responsibilities among the various levels of government.
    For the reasons discussed above, I certify that this AD:
    1. Is not a ``significant regulatory action'' under Executive Order
12866;
    2. Is not a ``significant rule'' under the DOT Regulatory Policies
and Procedures (44 FR 11034, February 26, 1979);
    3. Will not affect intrastate aviation in Alaska; and
    4. Will not have a significant economic impact, positive or
negative, on a substantial number of small entities under the criteria
of the Regulatory Flexibility Act.

List of Subjects in 14 CFR Part 39

    Air transportation, Aircraft, Aviation safety, Incorporation by
reference, Safety.

Adoption of the Amendment

    Accordingly, under the authority delegated to me by the
Administrator,

the FAA amends 14 CFR part 39 as follows:

PART 39--AIRWORTHINESS DIRECTIVES

0
1. The authority citation for part 39 continues to read as follows:

    Authority: 49 U.S.C. 106(g), 40113, 44701.

Sec.  39.13  [Amended]

0
2. The FAA amends Sec.  39.13 by removing airworthiness directive (AD)
2018-02-18, Amendment 39-19171 (83 FR 5182, February 6, 2018), and
adding the following new AD:

2018-20-08 Airbus SAS: Amendment 39-19442; Docket No. FAA-2018-0804;
Product Identifier 2018-NM-129-AD.

(a) Effective Date

    This AD is effective October 17, 2018.

 (b) Affected ADs

    This AD replaces AD 2018-02-18, Amendment 39-19171 (83 FR 5182,
February 6, 2018) (``AD 2018-02-18'').

 (c) Applicability

    This AD applies to the Airbus SAS airplanes identified in
paragraphs (c)(1) through (c)(4) of this AD, certificated in any
category, all manufacturer serial numbers.
    (1) Model A318-111, -112, -121, and -122 airplanes.
    (2) Model A319-111, -112, -113, -114, -115, -131, -132, and -133
airplanes.
    (3) Model A320-211, -212, -214, -216, -231, -232, -233, -251N,
and -271N airplanes.
    (4) Model A321-111, -112, -131, -211, -212, -213, -231, and -232
airplanes.

 (d) Subject

    Air Transport Association (ATA) of America Code 34, Navigation.

 (e) Reason

    This AD was prompted by a determination that, when two angle of
attack (AoA) sensors are adversely affected by icing conditions at
the same time, data displayed on the back-up speed scale (BUSS)
could be erroneous. We are issuing this AD to address erroneous
airspeed data displays, which could lead to an increased flightcrew
workload, possibly resulting in reduced control of the airplane.

 (f) Compliance

    Comply with this AD within the compliance times specified,
unless already done.

 (g) Definitions

    (1) Group 1 airplanes are those on which Airbus modification
35871 has been embodied in production, or Airbus Service Bulletin
A320-34-1397 or Airbus Service Bulletin A320-34-1543 has been
embodied in service (introducing air data monitoring and BUSS
function), except airplanes on which Airbus modification 159281 has
also been embodied in production, or Airbus Service Bulletin A320-
34-1658 or Airbus Service Bulletin A320-34-1659 has also been
embodied in service (installing reversible BUSS function).
    (2) Group 2 airplanes are those that are not in Group 1 and that
have amended the AFM as previously specified in EASA AD 2017-0257,
dated December 22, 2017.

 (h) AFM Revision

    (1) For Group 1 airplanes, except for airplanes identified in
paragraph (i) of this AD: Within 30 days after the effective date of
this AD, revise the AFM to incorporate the procedure specified in
figure 1 to paragraphs (h) and (i) of this AD.
    (2) For Group 2 airplanes: Within 30 days after the effective
date of this AD, revise the AFM by removing the procedure specified
in figure 1 to paragraphs (h) and (i) of this AD from the AFM.++
Billing Code 4910-13-P

[GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] TR02OC18.000

[GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] TR02OC18.001

[GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] TR02OC18.002

[GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] TR02OC18.003

Billing Code 4910-13-C

 (i) Optional Method of Compliance

    Airplanes operated with an AFM having the NAV-ADR 1+2+3 FAULT
procedure identical to the procedure specified in figure 1 to
paragraphs (h) and (i) of this AD, with an approval date on or after
March 2, 2017, are compliant with the requirements of this AD,
provided that the procedure is not removed from the AFM.

 (j) Other FAA AD Provisions

    The following provisions also apply to this AD:
    (1) Alternative Methods of Compliance (AMOCs): The Manager,
International Section, Transport Standards Branch, FAA, has the
authority to approve AMOCs for this AD, if requested using the
procedures found in 14 CFR 39.19. In accordance with 14 CFR 39.19,
send your request to your principal inspector or local Flight
Standards District Office, as appropriate. If sending information
directly to the International Section, send it to the attention of
the person identified in paragraph (k)(2) of this AD. Information
may be emailed to: [email protected]. Before using any
approved AMOC, notify your appropriate principal inspector, or
lacking a principal inspector, the manager of the local flight

standards district office/certificate holding district office.
    (2) Contacting the Manufacturer: As of the effective date of
this AD, for any requirement in this AD to obtain corrective actions
from a manufacturer, the action must be accomplished using a method
approved by the Manager, International Section, Transport Standards
Branch, FAA; or the European Aviation Safety Agency (EASA); or
Airbus SAS's EASA Design Organization Approval (DOA). If approved by
the DOA, the approval must include the DOA-authorized signature.

 (k) Related Information

    (1) Refer to Mandatory Continuing Airworthiness Information
(MCAI) EASA AD 2018-0189, dated August 30, 2018, for related
information. This MCAI may be found in the AD docket on the internet
at http://www.regulations.gov by searching for and locating Docket
No. FAA-2018-0804.
    (2) For more information about this AD, contact Sanjay Ralhan,
Aerospace Engineer, International Section, Transport Standards
Branch, FAA, 2200 South 216th St., Des Moines, WA 98351; telephone
and fax<PHONE_NUMBER>.

 (l) Material Incorporated by Reference

    None.

    Issued in Des Moines, Washington, on September 20, 2018.
John P. Piccola,
Acting Director, System Oversight Division, Aircraft Certification
Service.
[FR Doc. 2018-21347 Filed 10-1-18; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910-13-P


[Federal Register Volume 77, Number 102 (Friday, May 25, 2012)]
[Notices]
[Page 31357]
[FR Doc No: 2012-12792]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY

[FRL-9677-8]

Proposed Agreement Pursuant to the Comprehensive Environmental
Response, Compensation, and Liability Act for the Wabash Environmental
Technologies Site

AGENCY: Environmental Protection Agency (``EPA'').

ACTION: Notice; Request for public comment on proposed CERCLA 122(h)(1)
agreement with 21 parties for the Wabash Environmental Technologies
Superfund Site.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: In accordance with section 122(i)(1) of the Comprehensive
Environmental Response, Compensation and Liability Act of 1980, as
amended (``CERCLA''), notification is hereby given of a proposed
administrative agreement concerning the Wabash Environmental
Technologies hazardous waste site in Terre Haute, Indiana (the
``Site''). EPA proposes to enter into this agreement under the
authority of section 122(h) and 107 of CERCLA. The proposed agreement
has been executed by: AAA Galvanizing of Dixon, Inc.; Brenntag Mid-
South, Inc. (successor to G.S. Robins & Co. and Ulrich Chemical, Inc.);
Chemetall US, Inc., fka Oakite Products Inc.; City of Terre Haute Board
of Public Works and Safety; ConAgra Foods Inc.; Elixir Industries;
Enviromark Corporation; General Electric Company on behalf of GE
Silicones and Momentive Performance Materials, Inc.; Glas-Col LLC;
Interplastic Corporation; Marathon Pipe Line LLC; Northern Indiana
Public Service Company; Perma-Fix of Dayton, Inc./Perma-Fix
Environmental Services, Inc.; The Proctor & Gamble Manufacturing
Company; Rochester Midland Corporation; Rock-Tenn Company on behalf of
Smurfit-Stone; Speedway LLC (formerly known as Speedway SuperAmerica
LLC); Superior Oil Company, Inc.; Superior Oil Company, Inc. for
Superior Fiberglass & Resins; Technicote, Inc.; and Weatherford
International. (the ``Settling Parties'').
    Under the proposed agreement, the Settling Parties will pay a total
of $710,053.43 to the Hazardous Substances Superfund to resolve EPA's
claims against the Settling Parties for response costs incurred by EPA
at the Site. EPA has incurred response costs investigating and
performing response actions at the Site to mitigate potential imminent
and substantial endangerments to human health or the environment
presented or threatened by hazardous substances present at the Site.
    For thirty days following the date of publication of this notice,
the EPA will receive written comments relating to this proposed
agreement. EPA will consider all comments received and may decide not
to enter this proposed agreement if comments disclose facts or
considerations which indicate that the proposed agreement is
inappropriate, improper or inadequate.

DATES: Comments on the proposed agreement must be received by EPA on or
before June 25, 2012.

ADDRESSES: Comments should be addressed to the Docket Clerk, U.S.
Environmental Protection Agency, Region 5, 77 West Jackson Boulevard,
Chicago, Illinois 60604-3590, and should refer to: In the Matter of
Wabash Environmental Technologies Site, Chicago, Illinois, U.S. EPA
Docket No. V-W-12C-997.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Thomas J. Krueger, U.S. Environmental
Protection Agency, Office of Regional Counsel, C-14J, 77 West Jackson
Boulevard, Chicago, Illinois 60604-3590,<PHONE_NUMBER>.
    A copy of the proposed administrative settlement agreement may be
obtained in person or by mail from the EPA's Region 5 Office of
Regional Counsel, 77 West Jackson Boulevard, Chicago, Illinois 60604-
3590. Additional background information relating to the settlement is
available for review at the EPA's Region 5 Office of Regional Counsel.

    Authority: The Comprehensive Environmental Response,
Compensation, and Liability Act, as amended, 42 U.S.C. Sections
9601-9675.

    Dated: May 16, 2012.
Richard C. Karl,
Director, Superfund Division, Region 5.
[FR Doc. 2012-12792 Filed 5-24-12; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6560-50-P


[Federal Register Volume 82, Number 96 (Friday, May 19, 2017)]
[Notices]
[Page 22997]
[FR Doc No: 2017-10235]

=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY

[ER-FRL-9033-2]

Environmental Impact Statements; Notice of Availability

    Responsible Agency: Office of Federal Activities, General
Information<PHONE_NUMBER> or http://www.epa.gov/nepa.

Weekly receipt of Environmental Impact Statements (EISs)
Filed 05/08/2017 Through 05/12/2017
Pursuant to 40 CFR 1506.9

Notice

    Section 309(a) of the Clean Air Act requires that EPA make public
its comments on EISs issued by other Federal agencies. EPA's comment
letters on EISs are available at: http://www.epa.gov/compliance/nepa/eisdata.html.

EIS No. 20170080, Final, USAF, OR, Proposed Establishment and
Modification of Oregon Military Training Airspace, Review Period Ends:
06/19/2017, Contact: Kevin Marek<PHONE_NUMBER>
EIS No. 20170081, Final, USDA, ID, Middle Fork Weiser River Landscape
Restoration Project, Review Period Ends: 06/19/2017, Contact: Greg
Lesch<PHONE_NUMBER>
EIS No. 20170082, Final, NPS, CA, Scorpion Pier Replacement, Review
Period Ends: 06/19/2017, Contact: Russell Galipeau<PHONE_NUMBER>
EIS No. 20170083, Final, USFS, CA, Littlerock Reservoir Sediment
Removal Project, Review Period Ends: 06/19/2017, Contact: Chinling Chen
626-574-5255

Amended Notices

EIS No. 20170061, Draft, APHIS, NAT, Determination of Non-regulated
Status for Freeze Tolerant Eucalyptus Lines FTE 427 and FTE 435,
Comment Period Ends: 07/05/2017, Contact: Cindy Eck<PHONE_NUMBER>
Revision to FR Notice Published 04/21/2017; Extending the Comment
Period from 06/05/2017 to 07/05/2017

    Dated: May 16, 2017.
Dawn Roberts,
Management Analyst, NEPA Compliance Division, Office of Federal
Activities.
[FR Doc. 2017-10235 Filed 5-18-17; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6560-50-P


[Federal Register Volume 84, Number 92 (Monday, May 13, 2019)]
[Notices]
[Page 20875]
[FR Doc No: 2019-09707]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission

[Docket No. CP19-218-000]

Equitrans, L.P.; Notice of Request Under Blanket Authorization

    Take notice that on April 24, 2019, Equitrans, L.P., 2200 Energy
Drive Canonsburg, PA 15317, filed a prior notice application pursuant
to sections 157.205, 157.208(c), and 157.216(b) of the Federal Energy
Regulatory Commission's (Commission) regulations under the Natural Gas
Act (NGA), and Equitrans blanket certificate issued in Docket No. CP96-
532-000. Equitrans requests authorization to abandon and replace two
segments of its TP-4555 pipeline (Bare Pipe Replacement Project), one
of the pipelines which comprises Equitrans' Allegheny Valley Connector
System. The replacement segments, which are located in Westmoreland
County, Pennsylvania, total approximately 3.92 miles, all as more fully
set forth in the application, which is open to the public for
inspection. The filing may also be viewed on the web at http://www.ferc.gov using the ``eLibrary'' link. Enter the docket number
excluding the last three digits in the docket number field to access
the document. For assistance, contact FERC at
<EMAIL_ADDRESS>or call toll-free,<PHONE_NUMBER> or TTY,
(202) 502-8659.
    Specifically, Equitrans is proposing to abandon approximately 3.85
miles of 20-inch diameter pipeline on the TP-4555 pipeline and replace
it with approximately 3.92 miles of 20-inch diameter pipeline. The TP-
4555 pipeline is part of Equitrans' Allegheny Valley Connector System.
    Any questions regarding this application should be directed to
Matthew Eggerding Assistant General Counsel, 2200 Energy Drive,
Canonsburg, PA 15317, or call<PHONE_NUMBER>, or by email:
<EMAIL_ADDRESS>    Any person or the Commission's staff may, within 60 days after
issuance of the instant notice by the Commission, file pursuant to Rule
214 of the Commission's Procedural Rules (18 CFR 385.214) a motion to
intervene or notice of intervention and pursuant to Section 157.205 of
the regulations under the NGA (18 CFR 157.205), a protest to the
request. If no protest is filed within the time allowed therefore, the
proposed activity shall be deemed to be authorized effective the day
after the time allowed for filing a protest. If a protest is filed and
not withdrawn within 30 days after the allowed time for filing a
protest, the instant request shall be treated as an application for
authorization pursuant to section 7 of the NGA.
    Pursuant to section 157.9 of the Commission's rules, 18 CFR 157.9,
within 90 days of this Notice the Commission staff will either:
Complete its environmental assessment (EA) and place it into the
Commission's public record (eLibrary) for this proceeding, or issue a
Notice of Schedule for Environmental Review. If a Notice of Schedule
for Environmental Review is issued, it will indicate, among other
milestones, the anticipated date for the Commission staff's issuance of
the final environmental impact statement (FEIS) or EA for this
proposal. The filing of the EA in the Commission's public record for
this proceeding or the issuance of a Notice of Schedule for
Environmental Review will serve to notify federal and state agencies of
the timing for the completion of all necessary reviews, and the
subsequent need to complete all federal authorizations within 90 days
of the date of issuance of the Commission staff's FEIS or EA.
    Persons who wish to comment only on the environmental review of
this project should submit an original and two copies of their comments
to the Secretary of the Commission. Environmental commenters will be
placed on the Commission's environmental mailing list, and will be
notified of any meetings associated with the Commission's environmental
review process. Environmental commenters will not be required to serve
copies of filed documents on all other parties. However, the non-party
commenter will not receive copies of all documents filed by other
parties or issued by the Commission and will not have the right to seek
court review of the Commission's final order.
    The Commission strongly encourages electronic filings of comments,
protests and interventions in lieu of paper using the ``eFiling'' link
at http://www.ferc.gov. Persons unable to file electronically should
submit an original and 3 copies of the protest or intervention to the
Federal Energy Regulatory Commission, 888 First Street NE, Washington,
DC 20426.

    Dated: May 3, 2019.
Kimberly D. Bose,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2019-09707 Filed 5-10-19; 8:45 am]
 BILLING CODE 6717-01-P


[Federal Register Volume 87, Number 234 (Wednesday, December 7, 2022)]
[Notices]
[Page 75062]
[FR Doc No: 2022-26525]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY

Federal Emergency Management Agency

[Internal Agency Docket No. FEMA-3584-EM; Docket ID FEMA-2022-0001]

Florida; Amendment No. 2 to Notice of an Emergency Declaration

AGENCY: Federal Emergency Management Agency, DHS.

ACTION: Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: This notice amends the notice of an emergency declaration for
the State of Florida (FEMA-3584-EM), dated September 24, 2022, and
related determinations.

DATES: This amendment was issued November 10, 2022.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Dean Webster, Office of Response and
Recovery, Federal Emergency Management Agency, 500 C Street SW,
Washington, DC 20472,<PHONE_NUMBER>.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Notice is hereby given that the incident
period for this emergency is closed effective November 4, 2022.

    The following Catalog of Federal Domestic Assistance Numbers
(CFDA) are to be used for reporting and drawing funds: 97.030,
Community Disaster Loans; 97.031, Cora Brown Fund; 97.032, Crisis
Counseling; 97.033, Disaster Legal Services; 97.034, Disaster
Unemployment Assistance (DUA); 97.046, Fire Management Assistance
Grant; 97.048, Disaster Housing Assistance to Individuals and
Households In Presidentially Declared Disaster Areas; 97.049,
Presidentially Declared Disaster Assistance--Disaster Housing
Operations for Individuals and Households; 97.050, Presidentially
Declared Disaster Assistance to Individuals and Households--Other
Needs; 97.036, Disaster Grants--Public Assistance (Presidentially
Declared Disasters); 97.039, Hazard Mitigation Grant.

Deanne Criswell,
Administrator, Federal Emergency Management Agency.
[FR Doc. 2022-26525 Filed 12-6-22; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 9111-23-P