[Federal Register Volume 76, Number 63 (Friday, April 1, 2011)]
[Notices]
[Pages 18209-18210]
[FR Doc No: 2011-7680]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission

[Docket No. IC11-725D-001]

Commission Information Collection Activities (FERC-725D); Comment
Request; Submitted for OMB Review

AGENCY: Federal Energy Regulatory Commission.

ACTION: Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: In compliance with the requirements of section 3507 of the
Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995, 44 U.S.C. 3507, the Federal Energy
Regulatory Commission (Commission or FERC) has submitted the
information collection described below to the Office of Management and
Budget (OMB) for review of the information collection requirements. Any
interested person may file comments directly with OMB and should
address a copy of those comments to the Commission as explained below.
The Commission issued a Notice in the Federal Register (75 FR 71678,
11/24/2010) requesting public comments. FERC received no comments on
the FERC-725D and has made this notation in its submission to OMB.

DATES: Comments on the collection of information are due by May 2,
2011.

ADDRESSES: Address comments on the collection of information to the
Office of Management and Budget, Office of Information and Regulatory
Affairs, Attention: Federal Energy Regulatory Commission Desk Officer.
Comments to OMB should be filed electronically, c/o<EMAIL_ADDRESS>and include OMB Control Number 1902-0247 for
reference. The Desk Officer may be reached by telephone at 202-395-
4638.
    A copy of the comments should also be sent to: Federal Energy
Regulatory Commission, Secretary of the Commission, 888 First Street,
NE., Washington, DC 20426. Comments may be filed either on paper or on
CD/DVD, and should refer to Docket No. IC11-725D-001. Documents must be
prepared in an acceptable filing format and in compliance with
Commission submission guidelines at http://www.ferc.gov/help/submission-guide.asp. eFiling and eSubscription are not available for
Docket No. IC11-725D-001, due to a system issue. All comments may be
viewed, printed or downloaded remotely via the Internet through FERC's
homepage using the ``eLibrary'' link. For user assistance, contact
<EMAIL_ADDRESS>or toll-free at<PHONE_NUMBER>, or for TTY,
contact<PHONE_NUMBER>.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Ellen Brown may be reached by e-mail
at<EMAIL_ADDRESS>by telephone at<PHONE_NUMBER>, and by fax
at<PHONE_NUMBER>.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The information collected by the FERC-725D,
``Facilities Design, Connections and Maintenance Reliability
Standards'' (OMB Control No. 1902-0247), is required to implement the
statutory provisions of section 215 of the Federal Power Act (FPA) (16
U.S.C. 824o). On August 8, 2005, the Electricity Modernization Act of
2005, which is Title XII, Subtitle A, of the Energy Policy Act of 2005
(EPAct 2005), was enacted into law.\1\ EPAct 2005 added a new section
215 to the FPA, which required a Commission-certified Electric
Reliability Organization (ERO) to develop mandatory and enforceable
reliability standards, which are subject to Commission review and
approval. Once approved, the reliability standards may be enforced by
the ERO subject to Commission oversight, or the Commission can
independently enforce reliability standards.\2\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \1\ Energy Policy Act of 2005, Public Law 109-58, Title XII,
Subtitle A, 119 Stat. 594, 941 (2005), 16 U.S.C. 824o.
    \2\ 16 U.S.C. 824o(e)(3).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    On February 3, 2006, the Commission issued Order No. 672,
implementing section 215 of the FPA. Pursuant to Order No. 672, the
Commission certified one organization, North American Electric
Reliability Council (NERC), as the ERO. The reliability standards
developed by the ERO and approved by the Commission will apply to
users, owners and operators of the Bulk-Power System, as set forth in
each reliability standard.
    On November 15, 2006, NERC filed 20 revised reliability standards
and three new reliability standards for Commission approval. The
Commission addressed the 20 revised Reliability Standards in Order No.
693.\3\ The three new reliability standards were approved by FERC on
December 27, 2007 in Order 705 and were designated by NERC as follows:
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \3\ On March 16, 2007, the Commission approved 83 of the 107
standards initially filed by NERC. See Mandatory Reliability
Standards for the Bulk-Power System, Order No. 693, 72 FR, 16,416
(April 4, 2007), 118 FERC ] 61,218 (2007), order on reh'g Order No.
693-A, 120 FERC ] 61,053 (2007).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

     FAC-010-1 (System Operating Limits Methodology for the
Planning Horizon)
     FAC-011-1 (System Operating Limits Methodology for the
Operations Horizon)
     FAC-014-1 (Establish and Communicate System Operating
Limits).
    These standards were subsequently modified by NERC in April of 2008
and submitted to the Commission for approval. On March 20, 2009 the
Commission approved NERC's modifications to the FAC standards in Order
No. 722 and NERC now designates these standards as FAC-010-2, FAC-011-
2, and FAC-014-2.\4\ The three newly approved FAC reliability standards
require planning authorities and reliability coordinators to establish
methodologies to determine system operating limits (SOLs) for the bulk-
power system in the planning and operation horizons.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \4\ Version Two Facilities Design, Connections and Maintenance
Reliability Standards, Order No. 722, 126 FERC Stats. & Regs. 61,255
(2009).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    The three reliability standards do not require responsible entities
to file information with the Commission. Nor, with the exception of a
three year self-certification of compliance, do the Reliability
Standards require responsible entities to file information with the ERO
or Regional Entities. However, the Reliability Standards do require
responsible entities to develop and maintain certain information for a
specified period of time, subject to inspection by the ERO or Regional
Entities. Reliability standard FAC-010-2 requires the planning
authority to have a documented methodology for use in developing SOLs
and must retain evidence that it issued its SOL methodology to relevant
reliability coordinators, transmission operators and adjacent planning
authorities. Likewise, the planning authority must respond to technical
comments on the methodology within 45 days of receipt. Further, each
planning authority must self-certify its compliance to the compliance
monitor once every three years. Reliability standard FAC-011-2 requires
similar documentation by the

reliability coordinator.\5\ Reliability standard FAC-014-2 requires the
reliability coordinator, planning authority, transmission operator, and
transmission planner to verify compliance through self-certification
submitted to the compliance monitor annually. These entities must also
document that they have developed SOLs consistent with the applicable
SOL methodology and that they have provided SOLs to entities identified
in Requirement 5 of the reliability standard. Further, the planning
authority must maintain a list of multiple contingencies and their
associated stability limits.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \5\ The difference between the two is that FAC-10-1 deals with
SOL methodology for the planning horizon and FAC-011-1 with SOL
methodology for the operating horizon.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    Action: The Commission is requesting a three-year extension of the
FERC-725D reporting requirements, with no changes.
    Burden Statement: The estimated annual public reporting burden
follows:
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \6\ This figure comes from NERC's compliance registry matrix
which was updated on 10/27/10 and includes all entities registered
as a Planning Authority, Reliability Coordinator, Transmission
Planner, or Transmission Operator functions that are responsible for
compliance with FAC-014-2.
    \7\ Hours are attributable to developing SOLs. Recordkeeping
pertains to the documentation to be maintained for audits.

----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
                                        No. of      Average No. of
          Data collection             respondents    responses per   Average burden hours   Total annual burden
                                        \6\ (1)     respondent (2)     per response (3)    hours (1) x (2) x (3)
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
FERC-725D.........................             470               1  Reporting: \7\ 90....  Reporting: 42,300
                                                                   ---------------------------------------------
                                    ..............  ..............  Recordkeeping: 210...  Recordkeeping: 98,700
    Total.........................             470  ..............                         141,000
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

    The estimated average annualized cost is increased from the
previous estimate due to an increase in the number of entities who are
registered for the Planning Authority, Reliability Coordinator,
Transmission Planner, and Transmission Operator functions. The new
estimated average annualized cost is $6,640,500 ($14,128.72 per
respondent), as shown here:
     Reporting: \8\ 42,300 hours @ $95/hour = $4,018,500.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \8\ Estimate based on hourly costs for legal, technical and
administrative staff. See http://www.bls.gov/oes/current/naics2_22.htm and http://www.marylandlawyerblog.com/2009/07/average_hourly_rate_for_lawyer.html.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

     Recordkeeping: \9\ 98,700 hours @ $26/hour = $2,566,200.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \9\ Estimate based on hourly costs for technical and clerical
staff. See http://www.bls.gov/oes/current/naics2_22.htm.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    Storage: \10\ 1,800 sq. ft. @ $31/sq. ft. = $55,800.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \10\ Estimate based on in-office square foot costs obtained from
a Commission assessment of the industry performed in 2010.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    The reporting burden includes the total time, effort, or financial
resources expended to generate, maintain, retain, disclose, or provide
the information including: (1) Reviewing instructions; (2) developing,
acquiring, installing, and utilizing technology and systems for the
purposes of collecting, validating, verifying, processing, maintaining,
disclosing and providing information; (3) adjusting the existing ways
to comply with any previously applicable instructions and requirements;
(4) training personnel to respond to a collection of information; (5)
searching data sources; (6) completing and reviewing the collection of
information; and (7) transmitting, or otherwise disclosing the
information.
    The estimate of cost for respondents is based upon salaries for
professional and clerical support, as well as direct and indirect
overhead costs. Direct costs include all costs directly attributable to
providing this information, such as administrative costs and the cost
for information technology. Indirect or overhead costs are costs
incurred by an organization in support of its mission. These costs
apply to activities which benefit the whole organization rather than
any one particular function or activity.
    Comments are invited on: (1) Whether the proposed collection of
information is necessary for the proper performance of the functions of
the Commission, including whether the information will have practical
utility; (2) the accuracy of the agency's estimates of the burden of
the proposed collection of information, including the validity of the
methodology and assumptions used; (3) ways to enhance the quality,
utility and clarity of the information to be collected; and (4) ways to
minimize the burden of the collections of information on those who are
to respond, including the use of appropriate automated, electronic,
mechanical, or other technological collection techniques or other forms
of information technology, e.g. permitting electronic submission of
responses.

    Dated: March 25, 2011.
Kimberly D. Bose,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2011-7680 Filed 3-31-11; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6717-01-P


[Federal Register Volume 78, Number 192 (Thursday, October 3, 2013)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Pages 61171-61173]
[FR Doc No: 2013-23452]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION

Federal Aviation Administration

14 CFR Part 39

[Docket No. FAA-2013-0029; Directorate Identifier 2013-NE-01-AD;
Amendment 39-17599; AD 2013-19-17]
RIN 2120-AA64

Airworthiness Directives; Rolls-Royce plc Turbofan Engines

AGENCY: Federal Aviation Administration (FAA), DOT.

ACTION: Final rule.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: We are adopting a new airworthiness directive (AD) for all
Rolls-Royce plc (RR) RB211-535E4-B-37 series turbofan engines. This AD
requires removal of affected parts using a drawdown plan. This AD was
prompted by recalculating the lives of certain rotating life limited
parts (LLPs) operated to certain flight profiles. We are issuing this
AD to prevent the failure of rotating LLPs, which could result in
uncontained failure of the engine and damage to the airplane.

DATES: This AD becomes effective November 7, 2013. The Director of the
Federal Register approved the incorporation by reference of certain
publications listed in this AD as of November 7, 2013.

ADDRESSES: The Docket Operations office is located at Docket Management
Facility, U.S. Department of Transportation, 1200 New Jersey Avenue
SE., West Building Ground Floor, Room W12-140, Washington, DC 20590-
0001.

Examining the AD Docket

    You may examine the AD docket on the Internet at http://www.regulations.gov; or in person at the Docket Operations office
between 9 a.m. and 5 p.m., Monday through Friday, except Federal
holidays. The AD docket contains this AD, the mandatory continuing
airworthiness information (MCAI), regulatory evaluation, any comments
received, and other information. The street address for the Docket
Operations office (phone:<PHONE_NUMBER>) is provided in the ADDRESSES
section. Comments will be available in the AD docket shortly after
receipt.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Robert Green, Aerospace Engineer,
Engine Certification Office, FAA, Engine & Propeller Directorate, 12
New England Executive Park, Burlington, MA 01803; phone:<PHONE_NUMBER>;
fax:<PHONE_NUMBER>; email<EMAIL_ADDRESS>
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

Discussion

    We issued a notice of proposed rulemaking (NPRM) to amend 14 CFR
part 39 by adding an AD that would apply to the specified products. The
NPRM was published in the Federal Register on April 5, 2013 (78 FR
20509). The NPRM proposed to correct an unsafe condition for the
specified products. The MCAI states:

    Flight Profiles (FP) define the limits of engine operation
within which the engine will qualify for use of an associated set of
Critical Parts life limits. The Rolls-Royce RB211-535E4-B-37 engine
previously had only one such FP and associated set of life limits
published in the applicable RR Time Limits Manual.
    However, a recent review of operational flight data has revealed
that some engines may have been operated beyond the currently valid
datum FP.
    Failure to account for the correct rate of fatigue damage
associated with engine operation may lead to Critical Parts failure,
possibly resulting in release of high energy debris, damage to the
aeroplane and/or injury to occupants.

Comments

    We gave the public the opportunity to participate in developing
this AD. We considered the comments received.

Agreement With the AD

    The Boeing Company expressed support for the NPRM (78 FR 20509,
dated April 5, 2013).

Request To Be Less Specific About Service Bulletin Revision Level and
Date

    Texas Aero Engine Service LLC, RR, and United Airlines (UAL)
requested that we not include the revision level and date of RR Alert
Non-Modification Service Bulletin (NMSB) No. RB.211-72-AG875, or that
we add the words ``or later revision'' because service bulletins can be
revised often.
    We disagree. RR Alert NMSB No. RB.211-72-AG875, dated December 13,
2012, contains unique methods that require incorporation by reference,
requiring that we specify revision level and date. We do not know how
the NMSB may be revised in the future, and therefore cannot add the
words ``or later revision.'' We did not change this AD.

Request To Change the Definition of Engine Shop Visit (ESV)

    RR and UAL requested that we change our definition of ESV in
paragraph (g) of this AD by replacing the words ``separation of
flanges'' with ``deblading of the affected rotor disc.'' They noted
that our definition of ESV is not consistent with the instructions in
RR Alert NMSB No. RB.211-72-AG875, dated December 13, 2012, which only
applies when the rotor is debladed. Our ESV definition will result in
the removal of parts earlier than would occur using the RR NMSB. RR
noted that this is not necessary based on their risk assessment of a
possible failure. In a subsequent comment, RR asked that the ESV
definition be based on the deblading of the high pressure turbine disc
since this better defines an engine refurbishment shop visit.
    We disagree. We defined ESV as the separation of a pair of major
mating engine module flanges in order to satisfy our safety concerns
while minimizing the impact to the public. The redefined, reduced
cyclic life limits are needed to correct an unsafe condition. We have
determined that corrective actions can be practicably implemented at
next ESV and that these actions will provide an acceptable level of
safety. We did not change this AD.

Request To Exempt an External Gearbox Removal From the ESV Definition

    RR requested that we clarify that the separation of a pair of major
mating engine module flanges in paragraph (g) of this AD does not
include the separation of an engine external gearbox from the engine,
which would not constitute a refurbishment shop visit.
    We agree. We changed paragraph (g) of this AD to state: ``For the
purpose of this AD, ESV is whenever engine maintenance performed prior
to reinstallation requires the separation of a pair of major mating
engine module flanges. Separation of flanges solely for the purpose of
shipment without subsequent internal maintenance is not an ESV.
Separation of the external gearbox engine mating flanges or removal of
the external gearbox is also not classified as a shop visit.''

Request To Delay Implementation of Reduced Rotating Parts Life Limits

    American Air Lines (AAL) and RR asked that we revise or remove
paragraph (e)(2) of this AD to eliminate the requirement to assign the
reduced maximum approved lives within 30 days of the effective date of
this AD and allow the current lives as published in

the Time Limits Manual (TLM) to remain in effect until November 30,
2016. AAL stated that the AD requirement will cause problems for
operator life limit tracking systems, causing confusion and possibly
the grounding of aircraft. Operator life limit tracking systems prevent
the operation of parts beyond their maximum approved lives.
    We disagree. Operating beyond the redefined, reduced cyclic life
limits represents an unsafe condition. LLPs that exceed the reduced
life limits should be removed from service as soon as practicable to
correct an unsafe condition. We did not change this AD.

Request To Clarify Wording Regarding Compliance Date and Life Limits

    AAL and RR requested that we clarify wording in paragraph (e)(5) of
this AD regarding removal of affected parts by the compliance date, and
that the parts cannot exceed current life limits. One commenter stated
that this paragraph could potentially allow parts to operate beyond
both the current and reduced life limits.
    We partially agree. We agree that paragraph (e)(5) of this AD could
be misinterpreted because we did not specify that paragraph (e)(4) of
this AD applies to those engines which have an engine shop visit prior
to reaching the reduced life.
    We do not agree that the compliance wording could potentially allow
parts to operate beyond their current life limits because the life
limits, as published in the TLM for RR RB211 engines, cannot be
exceeded.
    We changed paragraph (e)(4) of this AD by inserting ``before
reaching the part life assigned in paragraph (e)(2)''. The paragraph
now reads: ``(4) After the effective date of this AD, for engines that
incorporate an LP turbine disc stage 2, IP compressor rotor shaft
(stage 1 to 6), HP compressor rear rotor shaft assembly, or HP turbine
disc whose part life is defined by paragraph (e)(1) of this AD, that
have an engine shop visit (ESV) before reaching the part life assigned
in paragraph (e)(2) of this AD, remove each part from service before
the part exceeds the part life assigned in paragraph (e)(2).''

Request To Change Compliance To Be Consistent With the RR NMSB

    AAL, RR, and UAL requested that we change the compliance to be
consistent with RR Alert NMSB No. RB.211-72-AG875, dated December 13,
2012. AAL noted that the risk assessment conducted by RR supports the
continued use of the current life limits for parts not exposed during a
shop visit, and demonstrated an acceptable level of safety. AAL further
stated that the AD as proposed (78 FR 20509, April 5, 2013) will result
in significant shop visit costs in comparison to the shop visit costs
associated with the RR Alert NMSB.
    We disagree. The redefined, reduced cyclic life limits are needed
to correct an unsafe condition. We have determined that corrective
actions can be practicably implemented at next ESV and that these
actions will provide an acceptable level of safety. We did not change
this AD.

Request To Change Compliance Time

    UAL requested that we change the compliance time in paragraphs
(e)(1) and (e)(2) of this AD from ``within 30 days'' to ``within 90
days'' because for UAL's fleet of 137 engines, 30 days is too short of
a compliance period.
    We disagree. The recommended timeframe for completion in RR Alert
NMSB No. RB.211-72-AG875, dated December 13, 2012, was 6 weeks. The new
lives of the rotating LLPs could have been recalculated starting from
when the NMSB was issued. In addition, the effective date of this AD is
35 days after the date of publication in the Federal Register, which
provides additional time beyond the 30 days mandated in this AD. We did
not change this AD.

Request To Change the Costs of Compliance

    AAL requested that we change the costs of compliance to include the
labor costs associated with replacing the parts (i.e., engine
disassembly costs). AAL states that the AD requires replacement of
parts in modules that are not related to an engine removal cause,
resulting in additional labor costs to access and replace those parts.
    We disagree. We consider the actual costs of this AD, which are
associated with the prorated reduction in the lives of the LLPs. We do
not consider the engine disassembly costs, which will vary depending on
the category of the ESV. We did not change this AD.

Conclusion

    We reviewed the available data, including the comments received,
and determined that air safety and the public interest require adopting
this AD with the changes described previously. We determined that these
changes will not increase the economic burden on any operator or
increase the scope of this AD.

Costs of Compliance

    We estimate that this AD will affect about 377 engines of U.S.
registry. Of these 377 engines, we estimate 95 engines operate to
Flight Profile D or E. The average labor rate is $85 per hour. We do
not estimate any labor cost is associated with this AD because the
affected parts are replaced at the next shop visit. Prorated cost of
parts adjusted to Flight Profile D operation, will cost about $77,672
per engine. Prorated cost of parts, adjusted to Flight Profile E
operation, will cost about $204,981 per engine. Based on these figures,
we estimate the cost of this AD on U.S. operators to be $11,834,655.

Authority for This Rulemaking

    Title 49 of the United States Code specifies the FAA's authority to
issue rules on aviation safety. Subtitle I, section 106, describes the
authority of the FAA Administrator. ``Subtitle VII: Aviation
Programs,'' describes in more detail the scope of the Agency's
authority.
    We are issuing this rulemaking under the authority described in
``Subtitle VII, Part A, Subpart III, Section 44701: General
requirements.'' Under that section, Congress charges the FAA with
promoting safe flight of civil aircraft in air commerce by prescribing
regulations for practices, methods, and procedures the Administrator
finds necessary for safety in air commerce. This regulation is within
the scope of that authority because it addresses an unsafe condition
that is likely to exist or develop on products identified in this
rulemaking action.

Regulatory Findings

    We determined that this AD will not have federalism implications
under Executive Order 13132. This AD will not have a substantial direct
effect on the States, on the relationship between the national
government and the States, or on the distribution of power and
responsibilities among the various levels of government.
    For the reasons discussed above, I certify this AD:
    (1) Is not a ``significant regulatory action'' under Executive
Order 12866,
    (2) Is not a ``significant rule'' under the DOT Regulatory Policies
and Procedures (44 FR 11034, February 26, 1979),
    (3) Will not affect intrastate aviation in Alaska to the extent
that it justifies making a regulatory distinction, and
    (4) Will not have a significant economic impact, positive or
negative, on a substantial number of small entities under the criteria
of the Regulatory Flexibility Act.

    We prepared a regulatory evaluation of the estimated costs to
comply with this AD and placed it in the AD docket.

List of Subjects in 14 CFR Part 39

    Air transportation, Aircraft, Aviation safety, Incorporation by
reference, Safety.

Adoption of the Amendment

    Accordingly, under the authority delegated to me by the
Administrator, the FAA amends 14 CFR part 39 as follows:

PART 39--AIRWORTHINESS DIRECTIVES

0
1. The authority citation for part 39 continues to read as follows:

    Authority:  49 U.S.C. 106(g), 40113, 44701.

Sec.  39.13  [Amended]

0
2. The FAA amends Sec.  39.13 by adding the following new airworthiness
directive (AD):

200X-19-17 Rolls-Royce plc Amendment 39-17599; Docket No. FAA-2013-
0029; Directorate Identifier 2013-NE-01-AD.

(a) Effective Date

    This AD becomes effective November 7, 2013.

(b) Affected ADs

    None.

(c) Applicability

    This AD applies to all Rolls-Royce plc (RR) RB211-535E4-B-37
series turbofan engines.

(d) Unsafe Condition

    This AD was prompted by recalculating the lives of certain
rotating life limited parts (LLPs) operated to certain flight
profiles. We are issuing this AD to prevent the failure of rotating
LLPs, which could result in uncontained failure of the engine and
damage to the airplane.

(e) Actions and Compliance

    Comply with this AD within the compliance times specified,
unless already done.
    (1) Within 30 days after the effective date of this AD, for
engines that have operated to Flight Profile D or E, recalculate the
life of the low-pressure (LP) turbine disc stage 2, intermediate-
pressure (IP) compressor rotor shaft (stage 1 to 6), high-pressure
(HP) compressor rear rotor shaft assembly, and HP turbine disc
installed on that engine. Use the part lives, prorated life
formulas, and flight profiles in Appendices 2, 4, and 5 of RR Alert
Non-Modification Service Bulletin (NMSB) No. RB.211-72-AG875, dated
December 13, 2012, to make that calculation.
    (2) Within 30 days after the effective date of this AD, for
engines that will operate to Flight Profile D or E, assign the
maximum approved lives defined in Appendix 2 of RR Alert NMSB No.
RB.211-72-AG875, dated December 13, 2012, to the LP turbine disc
stage 2, IP compressor rotor shaft (stage 1 to 6), HP compressor
rear rotor shaft assembly, and HP turbine disc based on the flight
profile that will be flown.
    (3) For engines that have only operated to, and will continue to
operate to, Flight Profile C, as defined in Appendix 5 of RR Alert
NMSB No. RB.211-72-AG875, dated December 13, 2012, no further action
is required by this AD.
    (4) After the effective date of this AD, for engines that
incorporate an LP turbine disc stage 2, IP compressor rotor shaft
(stage 1 to 6), HP compressor rear rotor shaft assembly, or HP
turbine disc whose part life is defined by paragraph (e)(1) of this
AD, that have an engine shop visit (ESV) before reaching the part
life assigned in paragraph (e)(2) of this AD, remove each part from
service before the part exceeds the part life assigned in paragraph
(e)(2).
    (5) For those engines that incorporate an LP turbine disc stage
2, IP compressor rotor shaft (stage 1 to 6), HP compressor rear
rotor shaft assembly, or HP turbine disc whose part life is defined
by paragraph (e)(1) of this AD, that do not have an ESV after the
effective date of this AD before the part exceeds the part life
assigned in paragraph (e)(2) of this AD, remove the part from
service at the next ESV.

(f) Installation Prohibition

    Any LP turbine disc stage 2, IP compressor rotor shaft (stage 1
to 6), HP compressor rear rotor shaft assembly, or HP turbine disc
whose part life is defined by paragraph (e)(1) of this AD that is
re-installed in any engine after the effective date of this AD must
be removed from service before the part exceeds the part life
assigned in paragraph (e)(2) of this AD.

(g) Definition

    For the purpose of this AD, ESV is whenever engine maintenance
performed prior to reinstallation requires the separation of a pair
of major mating engine module flanges. Separation of flanges solely
for the purpose of shipment without subsequent internal maintenance
is not an ESV. Separation of the external gearbox engine mating
flanges or removal of the external gearbox is also not classified as
a shop visit.

(h) Alternative Methods of Compliance (AMOCs)

    The Manager, Engine Certification Office, may approve AMOCs for
this AD. Use the procedures found in 14 CFR 39.19 to make your
request.

(i) Related Information

    (1) For more information about this AD, contact Robert Green,
Aerospace Engineer, Engine Certification Office, FAA, Engine &
Propeller Directorate, 12 New England Executive Park, Burlington, MA
01803; phone:<PHONE_NUMBER>; fax:<PHONE_NUMBER>; email:
<EMAIL_ADDRESS>    (2) Refer to European Aviation Safety Agency AD 2012-0265, dated
December 18, 2012, for related information. You may examine the AD
on the Internet at http://www.regulations.gov/#!documentDetail;D=FAA-2013-0029-0007.

(j) Material Incorporated by Reference

    (1) The Director of the Federal Register approved the
incorporation by reference (IBR) of the service information listed
in this paragraph under 5 U.S.C. 552(a) and 1 CFR part 51.
    (2) You must use this service information as applicable to do
the actions required by this AD, unless the AD specifies otherwise.
    (i) Rolls-Royce plc Alert Non-Modification Service Bulletin No.
RB.211-72-AG875, dated December 13, 2012.
    (ii) Reserved.
    (3) For Rolls-Royce plc service information identified in this
AD, contact Rolls-Royce plc, Corporate Communications, P.O. Box 31,
Derby, England, DE248BJ; phone: 011-44-1332-242424; fax: 011-44-
1332-249936; email: http://www.rolls-royce.com/contact/civil_team.jsp; or download from https://www.aeromanager.com.
    (4) You may view this service information at FAA, Engine &
Propeller Directorate, 12 New England Executive Park, Burlington,
MA. For information on the availability of this material at the FAA,
call<PHONE_NUMBER>.
    (5) You may view this service information at the National
Archives and Records Administration (NARA). For information on the
availability of this material at NARA, call<PHONE_NUMBER>, or go to:
http://www.archives.gov/federal-register/cfr/ibr-locations.html.

    Issued in Burlington, Massachusetts, on September 16, 2013.
Carlos A. Pestana,
Acting Directorate Assistant Manager, Engine & Propeller Directorate,
Aircraft Certification Service.
[FR Doc. 2013-23452 Filed 10-2-13; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910-13-P


--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Final Review Checklist for ICR Desk Officers  -  New, renewal and revision ICR Packages
INSTRUCTIONS: Complete Final Review Checklist for all new, renewal and revision ICRs. Provide checklist to Team Lead with the final ICR package.

ICR Information
ICR Title
National Water Quality Inventory Reports (Renewal)
EPA ICR Number
1560.13
OMB Control Number
2040-0071
ICR Desk Officer
Teddy

Supporting Statement

                            Comments for Team Lead
                                      ☑
The Supporting Statement contains all major sections listed in the template.

                                      ☑
The title of the ICR is consistent with what it has been in the past or the ICR Owner has provided an explanation as to why it has changed.

                                      ☑
All Terms of Clearance from the previous ICR have been addressed.

                                      ☑
Section 3(b) includes the following information about the 1[st] FR Notice - publication date, FR citation, description of the comments received (if any), and EPA's response to the comments.

                                      ☑
Section 3(c) includes a description of the consultations conducted for this specific renewal package.

                                      ☑
Sections 6(b) and (c) include updated, loaded wage rates.

                                      ☑
Section 6(f) includes a detailed explanation of the reason for change and whether this change is a program change or an adjustment.
Note: If the ICRAS has both a program change and an adjustment, the change in hours and costs must be split accordingly between the two types of change.

                                      ☑
Section 6(g) includes the proper template language.

                                      ☑
The document contains tracked changes for all changes made.

                                      ☑
The document has one-inch margins, Times New Roman/12 point font.

                                      ☑
The document contains page numbers.

                                      ☑
The document is type is ".docx".

                                      ☑
The document name is in the following format - ####ss## if no changes were made or ####ss##initialsdate (e.g., 2000.01ck9-25-19) if changes were made.

Federal Register Notice

                            Comments for Team Lead
                              Header Information
                                      ☑
The document cites the correct (6560-50-P) billing code in the top right corner.

                                      ☑
The document cites the correct FRL Number.

                                      ☑
The ICR title matches exactly what is in the Supporting Statement.

                                    Summary
                                      ☑
The document cites the correct ICR Number, OMB Control Number, expiration date, and publication date of the 1[st] FR Notice.

                                      ☑
The summary section does not include any legal citations (i.e., CFR or USC references).

                           Supplementary Information
                                      ☑
The Abstract includes a comprehensive, but brief, description of the information collection.

                                      ☑
The form numbers listed are consistent with the form numbers listed in ICRAS, Part 2.

                                      ☑
The hour and cost burden matches exactly what is in the Supporting Statement and the total cost burden is split between labor costs and non-labor costs (capital and O&M costs)

                                      ☑
The Changes in the Estimates section addresses the amount of change, whether the change is an adjustment or program change, and a high-level explanation of the change.

                            Formatting, Edits, Etc.
                                      ☑
All of the standard template language is included and has not been changed.

                                      ☑
The document contains tracked changes for all changes made.

                                      ☑
All blue instructional language has been removed from the document.

                                      ☑
The document has one-inch margins, Times New Roman/12 point font.

                                      ☑
The document contains page numbers and is 4 pages or less in length.

                                      ☑
The document is type is ".docx".

                                      ☑
The document name is in the following format - ####fr## if no changes were made or ####fr##initialsdate (e.g., 2000.01ck9-25-19) if changes were made.

ICRAS Entry

                            Comments for Team Lead
                                    Part 1
                                      ☐
The ICR title matches exactly what is in the Supporting Statement.

                                      ☐
If program changes are being made, Type of Request is "revision a currently approved collection."

                                    Part 2
                                      ☐
There is a separate IC for each "Affected Public" type and each "Obligation to Respond" type.

                                      ☐
The number of ICs is the same as the previous ICR or the ICR Owner has provided an explanation as to why it has changed.

                                      ☐
Each form associated with the ICR was uploaded as a separate file with a unique form number.  The files from the last ICR renewal were deleted and replaced for forms that were updated.

                                      ☐
The Annual Cost Burden includes only capital and O&M costs (not labor costs).

                                      ☐
The change in burden was correct split among the Program Change and Adjustment columns.

                                      ☐
The Annual Number of Responses, Annual Hour Burden and Annual Cost Burden in the Summary of Burden table matches exactly what is in the supporting statement.

                                     Files
                                      ☐
All files were uploaded into ICRAS, including the Supporting Statement, FR Notice, Supplemental Tables/Documents, and Typesetting Request


[Federal Register Volume 76, Number 86 (Wednesday, May 4, 2011)]
[Notices]
[Page 25358]
[FR Doc No: 2011-10764]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES

Food and Drug Administration

[Docket No. FDA-2011-N-0002]

2011 Parenteral Drug Association/Food and Drug Administration
Glass Quality Conference; Public Conference

AGENCY: Food and Drug Administration, HHS.

ACTION: Notice of public conference.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Food and Drug Administration (FDA), in cosponsorship with
the Parenteral Drug Association (PDA), is announcing a public
conference entitled ``PDA/FDA Glass Quality Conference--Best Practices
to Prevent and/or Detect At-Risk Glass Packaging.''
    Date and Time: The public conference will be held on May 23, 2011,
from 7 a.m. to 6:30 p.m. and May 24, 2011, from 7 a.m. to 4:30 p.m.
    Location: The public conference will be held at the Key Bridge
Marriott Hotel, 1401 Lee Highway, Arlington, VA 22209, 1-703-524-6400,
FAX: 1-703-524-8964.
    Contact Person: Wanda Neal, Parenteral Drug Association (PDA), PDA
Global Headquarters, Bethesda Towers, 4350 East-West Highway, suite
200, Bethesda, MD 20814, 1-301-656-5900, extension 111, FAX: 1-301-986-
1093, e-mail<EMAIL_ADDRESS>    Accommodations: Attendees are responsible for their own
accommodations. To make reservations at the Key Bridge Marriott Hotel,
at the reduced conference rate, contact the Key Bridge Marriott Hotel
(see Location), citing meeting code ``PDA.'' Room Rates are: Single/
Double: $229, plus applicable state and local. Reservations can be made
on a space and rate availability basis.
    Registration: You are encouraged to register at your earliest
convenience. The PDA registration fees cover the cost of facilities,
materials, and breaks. Seats are limited; therefore, submit your
registration as soon as possible. Conference space will be filled in
order of receipt of registration. Onsite registration will be available
on a space available basis on the day of the public conference
beginning at 7 a.m. on May 23, 2011. The cost of registration is as
follows:

PDA Members................................................    $1,895.00
PDA Non-Members............................................    $2,144.00
Government/Health Authority PDA Member.....................      $700.00
Government/Health Authority PDA Non-Member.................      $700.00
PDA Member Academic........................................      $700.00
PDA Non-Member Academic/Health Authority...................      $780.00
PDA Member Students........................................      $280.00
PDA Non-Member Students....................................      $310.00

    If you need special accommodations due to a disability, please
attach a written description of your needs with your registration form.
Specific questions can be e-mailed to<EMAIL_ADDRESS>    Registration Instructions: To register, please submit your
registration form online http://www.pda.org/glassquality2011 or by mail
to: PDA Global Headquarters, 4350 East West Highway, suite 150,
Bethesda, MD 20814. (FDA has verified the Web site address, but is not
responsible for subsequent changes to the Web site after this document
publishes in the Federal Register.)

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Due to recent glass packaging quality issues
and recalls related to defects or incompatibilities with finished
product over the shelf life, pharmaceutical manufacturers and glass
suppliers have recognized the need for improvements in glass packaging
and glass handling practices throughout the product life cycle.
Appropriate standards, glass supplier reliability, and best practices
on glass handling and distribution are all necessary elements in the
maintenance of container integrity and product sterility assurance
throughout the product life cycle of sterile injectable pharmaceutical
and biopharmaceutical products. The 2-day public conference will cover:
     Current issues with glass packaging,
     Best practices on glass handling,
     Current expectations for incoming glass and pharmaceutical
product packaging,
     How to establish an effective glass supplier relationship
for product improvement, and
     Improvements in glass manufacturing, characterization,
handling or packaging.
    The conference program will include an exhibition on May 23 and 24,
2011.

    Dated: April 28, 2011.
Leslie Kux,
Acting Assistant Commissioner for Policy.
[FR Doc. 2011-10764 Filed 5-3-11; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4160-01-P


[Federal Register Volume 87, Number 150 (Friday, August 5, 2022)]
[Notices]
[Pages 48013-48015]
[FR Doc No: 2022-16833]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission

Combined Notice of Filings #1

    Take notice that the Commission received the following exempt
wholesale generator filings:

    Docket Numbers: EG22-195-000.
    Applicants: Powells Creek Farm Solar, LLC.
    Description: Powells Creek Farm Solar, LLC submits Notice of Self-
Certification of Exempt Wholesale Generator Status.
    Filed Date: 7/29/22.
    Accession Number: 20220729-5360.
    Comment Date: 5 p.m. ET 8/19/22.

    Docket Numbers: EG22-196-000.
    Applicants: Salt City Solar LLC.
    Description: Salt City Solar LLC submits Notice of Self-
Certification of Exempt Wholesale Generator Status.
    Filed Date: 7/29/22.
    Accession Number: 20220729-5361.
    Comment Date: 5 p.m. ET 8/19/22.

    Docket Numbers: EG22-197-000.
    Applicants: ENGIE Solidago Solar LLC.
    Description: ENGIE Solidago Solar LLC submits Notice of Self-
Certification of Exempt Wholesale Generator Status.
    Filed Date: 7/29/22.
    Accession Number: 20220729-5362.
    Comment Date: 5 p.m. ET 8/19/22.

    Docket Numbers: EG22-198-000.
    Applicants: Sunnybrook Farm Solar, LLC.
    Description: Sunnybrook Farm Solar, LLC submits Notice of Self-
Certification of Exempt Wholesale Generator Status.
    Filed Date: 7/29/22.
    Accession Number: 20220729-5363.
    Comment Date: 5 p.m. ET 8/19/22.

    Take notice that the Commission received the following electric
rate filings:

    Docket Numbers: ER10-2437-018.
    Applicants: Arizona Public Service Company.
    Description: Notice of Change in Status of Arizona Public Service
Company.
    Filed Date: 7/29/22.
    Accession Number: 20220729-5383.
    Comment Date: 5 p.m. ET 8/19/22.

    Docket Numbers: ER10-2687-006.
    Applicants: Monongahela Power Company.
    Description: Notice of Non-Material Change in Status of Monongahela
Power Company.
    Filed Date: 7/29/22.
    Accession Number: 20220729-5381.
    Comment Date: 5 p.m. ET 8/19/22.

    Docket Numbers: ER10-2689-009.
    Applicants: West Penn Power Company.
    Description: Notice of Non-Material Change in Status of West Penn
Power Company.
    Filed Date: 7/29/22.
    Accession Number: 20220729-5382.
    Comment Date: 5 p.m. ET 8/19/22.

    Docket Numbers: ER12-1470-013; ER10-3026-011; ER16-1833-008.
    Applicants: Sempra Gas & Power Marketing, LLC, Termoelectrica U.S.,
LLC, Energia Sierra Juarez U.S., LLC.
    Description: Notice of Non-Material Change in Status of Energia
Sierra Juarez U.S., LLC, et al.
    Filed Date: 7/29/22.
    Accession Number: 20220729-5392.
    Comment Date: 5 p.m. ET 8/19/22.

    Docket Numbers: ER13-1865-006.
    Applicants: Tesoro Refining & Marketing Company LLC.
    Description: Notice of Change in Status of Tesoro Refining &
Marketing Company LLC.
    Filed Date: 7/29/22.
    Accession Number: 20220729-5387.
    Comment Date: 5 p.m. ET 8/19/22.

    Docket Numbers: ER15-1218-014; ER16-38-012; ER16-39-011; ER16-2501-
008; ER16-2502-008; ER17-2341-009; ER17-2453-008; ER18-713-007; ER20-
2888-006.
    Applicants: Townsite Solar, LLC, CA Flats Solar 150, LLC, Imperial
Valley Solar 3, LLC, CA Flats Solar 130, LLC, Tropico, LLC, Nicolis,
LLC, Kingbird Solar B, LLC, Kingbird Solar A, LLC, Solar Star
California XIII, LLC.
    Description: Notice of Change in Status of Solar Star California
XIII, LLC, et al.
    Filed Date: 7/29/22.
    Accession Number: 20220729-5380.
    Comment Date: 5 p.m. ET 8/19/22.

    Docket Numbers: ER16-262-003.
    Applicants: Uniper Global Commodities North America LLC.
    Description: Notice of Non-Material Change in Status of Uniper
Global Commodities North America LLC.
    Filed Date: 7/29/22.
    Accession Number: 20220729-5394.
    Comment Date: 5 p.m. ET 8/19/22.

    Docket Numbers: ER17-350-001.
    Applicants: ITC Lake Erie Connector, LLC.
    Description: Notice of Withdrawal of July 1, 2022 Compliance Filing
of ITC Lake Erie Connector LLC.
    Filed Date: 7/28/22.
    Accession Number: 20220728-5234.
    Comment Date: 5 p.m. ET 8/18/22.

    Docket Numbers: ER17-1981-001; ER17-1984-001; ER17-1988-001; ER22-
2574-000; ER22-2575-000.
    Applicants: Big Savage, LLC, Highland North LLC, Patton Wind Farm,
LLC, Vitol Inc., Big Sky Wind, LLC, Patton Wind Farm, LLC, Highland
North LLC, Big Savage, LLC.
    Description: Notice of Change in Status of Big Savage, LLC, et al.
    Filed Date: 7/29/22.
    Accession Number: 20220729-5379.
    Comment Date: 5 p.m. ET 8/19/22.

    Docket Numbers: ER19-1280-005; ER19-1281-005.
    Applicants: Lexington Chenoa Wind Farm LLC, Broadlands Wind Farm
LLC.
    Description: Notice of Change in Status of Broadlands Wind Farm
LLC, et al.
    Filed Date: 7/29/22.
    Accession Number: 20220729-5393.

    Comment Date: 5 p.m. ET 8/19/22.

    Docket Numbers: ER20-1718-004.
    Applicants: New York Independent System Operator, Inc.
    Description: Compliance filing: Compliance filing of tariff
revisions for Part A enhancements.
    Filed Date: 8/1/22.
    Accession Number: 20220801-5137.
    Comment Date: 5 p.m. ET 8/22/22.

    Docket Numbers: ER21-58-000.
    Applicants: TransAlta Energy Marketing (U.S.) Inc.
    Description: Refund Report: Refund Report to be effective N/A.
    Filed Date: 8/1/22.
    Accession Number: 20220801-5098.
    Comment Date: 5 p.m. ET 8/22/22.

    Docket Numbers: ER22-1065-002.
    Applicants: Rabbitbrush Solar, LLC.
    Description: Notice of Change in Status of Rabbitbrush Solar, LLC.
    Filed Date: 8/1/22.
    Accession Number: 20220801-5160.
    Comment Date: 5 p.m. ET 8/22/22.

    Docket Numbers: ER22-2044-001.
    Applicants: Just Energy Limited.
    Description: Tariff Amendment: Just Energy Limited Amendment to
Market-Based Rate Application to be effective 8/6/2022.
    Filed Date: 8/1/22.
    Accession Number: 20220801-5158.
    Comment Date: 5 p.m. ET 8/22/22.

    Docket Numbers: ER22-2358-001.
    Applicants: Versant Power.
    Description: Compliance filing: Errata (Amended) Order No. 881
Compliance Filing (ER22-2358) to be effective 7/12/2025.
    Filed Date: 8/1/22.
    Accession Number: 20220801-5110.
    Comment Date: 5 p.m. ET 8/22/22.

    Docket Numbers: ER22-2562-000.
    Applicants: Midcontinent Independent System Operator, Inc., Entergy
Services, LLC.
    Description: Sec.  205(d) Rate Filing: Midcontinent Independent
System Operator, Inc. submits tariff filing per 35.13(a)(2)(iii): 2022-
07-29_Entergy Operating Companies True-Up Filing to be effective 6/1/
2021.
    Filed Date: 7/29/22.
    Accession Number: 20220729-5242.
    Comment Date: 5 p.m. ET 8/19/22.

    Docket Numbers: ER22-2563-000.
    Applicants: Tri-State Generation and Transmission Association, Inc.
    Description: Sec.  205(d) Rate Filing: Initial Filing of Rate
Schedule FERC No. 343 to be effective 9/27/2022.
    Filed Date: 7/29/22.
    Accession Number: 20220729-5248.
    Comment Date: 5 p.m. ET 8/19/22.

    Docket Numbers: ER22-2564-000.
    Applicants: Tri-State Generation and Transmission Association, Inc.
    Description: Sec.  205(d) Rate Filing: Initial Filing of Rate
Schedule FERC No. 344 to be effective 9/27/2022.
    Filed Date: 7/29/22.
    Accession Number: 20220729-5252.
    Comment Date: 5 p.m. ET 8/19/22.

    Docket Numbers: ER22-2565-000.
    Applicants: Tri-State Generation and Transmission Association, Inc.
    Description: Tariff Amendment: Notice of Cancellation of Service
Agreements Nos. 325 and 326 to be effective 9/27/2022.
    Filed Date: 7/29/22.
    Accession Number: 20220729-5258.
    Comment Date: 5 p.m. ET 8/19/22.

    Docket Numbers: ER22-2566-000.
    Applicants: PJM Interconnection, L.L.C.
    Description: Sec.  205(d) Rate Filing: Amendment to ISA, Service
Agreement No. 6131; Queue No. AE2-042 to be effective 7/15/2021.
    Filed Date: 7/29/22.
    Accession Number: 20220729-5282.
    Comment Date: 5 p.m. ET 8/19/22.

    Docket Numbers: ER22-2567-000.
    Applicants: Portland General Electric Company.
    Description: Sec.  205(d) Rate Filing: Revised Volume 14 Version
3.0 to be effective 10/1/2022.
    Filed Date: 8/1/22.
    Accession Number: 20220801-5001.
    Comment Date: 5 p.m. ET 8/22/22.

    Docket Numbers: ER22-2568-000.
    Applicants: New England Power Pool Participants Committee.
    Description: Sec.  205(d) Rate Filing: Aug 2022 Membership Filing
to be effective 7/1/2022.
    Filed Date: 8/1/22.
    Accession Number: 20220801-5002.
    Comment Date: 5 p.m. ET 8/22/22.

    Docket Numbers: ER22-2569-000.
    Applicants: Dickerson Power, LLC.
    Description: Sec.  205(d) Rate Filing: Proposed Revisions to
Reactive Service Rate Schedule to be effective 10/23/2022.
    Filed Date: 8/1/22.
    Accession Number: 20220801-5036.
    Comment Date: 5 p.m. ET 8/22/22.

    Docket Numbers: ER22-2570-000.
    Applicants: Sierra Pacific Power Company.
    Description: Sec.  205(d) Rate Filing: SPPC Revised Rate Schedule
No. 42 to be effective 10/1/2022.
    Filed Date: 8/1/22.
    Accession Number: 20220801-5059.
    Comment Date: 5 p.m. ET 8/22/22.

    Docket Numbers: ER22-2571-000.
    Applicants: Versant Power.
    Description: Sec.  205(d) Rate Filing: Re-collation of 3 Records in
eTariff Public Viewer for-MPD OATT to be effective 8/1/2022.
    Filed Date: 8/1/22.
    Accession Number: 20220801-5093.
    Comment Date: 5 p.m. ET 8/22/22.

    Docket Numbers: ER22-2572-000.
    Applicants: UGI Utilities, Inc., PJM Interconnection, L.L.C.
    Description: Sec.  205(d) Rate Filing: UGI Utilities, Inc. submits
tariff filing per 35.13(a)(2)(iii): UGIU revisions to Formula Rate
regarding Single-Issue Depreciation Rate to be effective 10/1/2022.
    Filed Date: 8/1/22.
    Accession Number: 20220801-5095.
    Comment Date: 5 p.m. ET 8/22/22.

    Docket Numbers: ER22-2573-000.
    Applicants: PJM Interconnection, L.L.C.
    Description: Sec.  205(d) Rate Filing: Original ICSAs, Service
Agreement Nos. 6546 and 6547; Queue No. AD1-152 to be effective 7/1/
2022.
    Filed Date: 8/1/22.
    Accession Number: 20220801-5100.
    Comment Date: 5 p.m. ET 8/22/22.

    Docket Numbers: ER22-2576-000.
    Applicants: Alabama Power Company, Georgia Power Company,
Mississippi Power Company.
    Description: Sec.  205(d) Rate Filing: Alabama Power Company
submits tariff filing per 35.13(a)(2)(iii): NextEra Energy Resources
(Lawrence Creek Solar) LGIA Filing to be effective 7/18/2022.
    Filed Date: 8/1/22.
    Accession Number: 20220801-5112.
    Comment Date: 5 p.m. ET 8/22/22.

    Docket Numbers: ER22-2577-000.
    Applicants: Alabama Power Company, Georgia Power Company,
Mississippi Power Company.
    Description: Sec.  205(d) Rate Filing: Alabama Power Company
submits tariff filing per 35.13(a)(2)(iii): Montgomery Solar (Solar &
Storage) LGIA Filing to be effective 7/18/2022.
    Filed Date: 8/1/22.
    Accession Number: 20220801-5113.
    Comment Date: 5 p.m. ET 8/22/22.

    Docket Numbers: ER22-2579-000.
    Applicants: Georgia Power Company, Mississippi Power Company,
Alabama Power Company.
    Description: Sec.  205(d) Rate Filing: Georgia Power Company
submits tariff filing per 35.13(a)(2)(iii): Dothan Solar (Solar &
Storage) LGIA Filing to be effective 7/18/2022.
    Filed Date: 8/1/22.
    Accession Number: 20220801-5118.
    Comment Date: 5 p.m. ET 8/22/22.

    Docket Numbers: ER22-2580-000.
    Applicants: CPV Three Rivers, LLC.
    Description: Baseline eTariff Filing: Application for Market-Based
Rate Authority to be effective 10/1/2022.

    Filed Date: 8/1/22.
    Accession Number: 20220801-5131.
    Comment Date: 5 p.m. ET 8/22/22.

    Docket Numbers: ER22-2581-000.
    Applicants: Power Authority of the State of New York, New York
Independent System Operator, Inc.
    Description: Sec.  205(d) Rate Filing: Power Authority of the State
of New York submits tariff filing per 35.13(a)(2)(iii): Section 205
filing of NYPA proposed depreciation rate updates in Formula Rate to be
effective 10/1/2022.
    Filed Date: 8/1/22.
    Accession Number: 20220801-5178.
    Comment Date: 5 p.m. ET 8/22/22.

    Take notice that the Commission received the following electric
securities filings:

    Docket Numbers: ES22-61-000.
    Applicants: AEP Texas Inc.
    Description: Application Under Section 204 of the Federal Power Act
for Authorization to Issue Securities of AEP Texas Inc.
    Filed Date: 7/29/22.
    Accession Number: 20220729-5391.
    Comment Date: 5 p.m. ET 8/19/22.

    The filings are accessible in the Commission's eLibrary system
(https://elibrary.ferc.gov/idmws/search/fercgensearch.asp) by querying
the docket number.
    Any person desiring to intervene or protest in any of the above
proceedings must file in accordance with Rules 211 and 214 of the
Commission's Regulations (18 CFR 385.211 and 385.214) on or before 5:00
p.m. Eastern time on the specified comment date. Protests may be
considered, but intervention is necessary to become a party to the
proceeding.
    eFiling is encouraged. More detailed information relating to filing
requirements, interventions, protests, service, and qualifying
facilities filings can be found at: http://www.ferc.gov/docs-filing/efiling/filing-req.pdf. For other information, call<PHONE_NUMBER>
(toll free). For TTY, call<PHONE_NUMBER>.

    Dated: August 1, 2022.
Debbie-Anne A. Reese,
Deputy Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2022-16833 Filed 8-4-22; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6717-01-P


[Federal Register Volume 82, Number 120 (Friday, June 23, 2017)]
[Notices]
[Pages 28716-28718]
[FR Doc No: 2017-13096]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

[Release No. 34-80965; File No. SR-MRX-2017-07]

Self-Regulatory Organizations; Nasdaq MRX, LLC; Notice of Filing
and Immediate Effectiveness of Proposed Rule Change To Amend Chapter 19

June 19, 2017.
    Pursuant to Section 19(b)(1) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934
(``Act''),\1\ and Rule 19b-4 thereunder,\2\ notice is hereby given that
on June 6, 2017, Nasdaq MRX, LLC (``MRX'' or ``Exchange'') filed with
the Securities and Exchange Commission (``SEC'' or ``Commission'') the
proposed rule change as described in Items I and II below, which Items
have been prepared by the Exchange. The Commission is publishing this
notice to solicit comments on the proposed rule change from interested
persons.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \1\ 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(1).
    \2\ 17 CFR 240.19b-4.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

I. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement of the Terms of Substance
of the Proposed Rule Change

    The Exchange proposes to amend Chapter 19 to notify members of a
systems issue related to allocations made pursuant to Supplementary
Material .02(a)-(b) to Rule 1901.
    The text of the proposed rule change is available on the Exchange's
Web site at www.ise.com, at the principal office of the Exchange, and
at the Commission's Public Reference Room.

II. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement of the Purpose of, and
Statutory Basis for, the Proposed Rule Change

    In its filing with the Commission, the Exchange included statements
concerning the purpose of and basis for the proposed rule change and
discussed any comments it received on the proposed rule change. The
text of these statements may be examined at the places specified in
Item IV below. The Exchange has prepared summaries, set forth in
sections A, B, and C below, of the most significant aspects of such
statements.

A. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement of the Purpose of, and
Statutory Basis for, the Proposed Rule Change

1. Purpose
    The purpose of the proposed rule change is to amend Chapter 19 to
notify members of a systems issue related to allocations made pursuant
to Supplementary Material .02(a)-(b) to Rule 1901 (``Flash auction'').
Pursuant to Supplementary Material .02 to Rule 1901, when the automatic
execution of an incoming order would result in an impermissible Trade
Through,\3\ such order is exposed at the current national best bid or
offer (``NBBO'') to all members, and members are given an opportunity
to enter responses up to the size of the order being exposed.
Supplementary Material .02(a)-(b) to Rule 1901 provides that interest
executed in the Flash auction is allocated in price priority, and, at
the same price, Priority Customer orders will be executed first in time
priority and then all other interest (orders, quotes, and responses)
will be allocated pro-rata based on size. Currently, however, the
system is erroneously providing the Primary Market Maker (``PMM'') an
enhanced allocation after Priority Customer Orders on the book, and
ahead of Responses, Professional Orders, and other market maker quotes.
Specifically, the PMM is being erroneously given participation rights
in a Flash auction pursuant to Supplementary Material .01(b)-(c) to
Rule 713, which results in the PMM receiving a potentially larger share
of the order to be executed. That is, if the PMM is quoting at the best
price and the conditions in Supplementary Material .01(b)-(c) to Rule
713 are satisfied, the PMM is given participation rights equal to the
greater of (i) the proportion of the total size at the best price
represented by the size of its quote, or (ii) sixty percent (60%) of
the contracts to be allocated if there is only one (1) other
Professional Order or market maker quotation at the best price, forty
percent (40%) if there are two (2) other Professional Orders and/or
market maker quotes at the best price, and thirty percent (30%) if
there are more than two (2) other Professional Orders and/or market
maker quotes at the best price. Alternatively, orders for five (5)
contracts or fewer will be executed first by the PMM, if he is present
at that price.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \3\ ``Trade-Through'' means a transaction in an option series at
a price that is lower than a Protected Bid or higher than a
Protected Offer. See Rule 1900(q).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    This enhanced allocation was intended for the PMM when orders are
allocated in the regular market, and not for the allocation of an order
exposed pursuant to Supplementary Material .02 to Rule 1901 (i.e., the
Flash auction). The Exchange has notified members and the Commission of
this systems issue pursuant to Regulation SCI. The purpose of the
proposed rule change is to provide additional notification to members
by noting in Chapter 19 of the Exchange's rulebook the discrepancy
between the allocation described in the rule and the allocation
currently being given by the Exchange's trading system. The Exchange is
currently migrating its trading system to the Nasdaq INET architecture,
and the allocation issue will be resolved as symbols start trading on
INET in Q3 2017. In the interim, the Exchange proposes to add language
to Chapter 19 to notify members that until such time as symbols are
migrated to INET, Flash auction allocations pursuant to Supplementary
Material .02(a)-(b) to Rule 1901 will not be provided as described in
that rule. Instead, PMM quotes will be given a Flash auction allocation
pursuant to Supplementary Material .01(b)-(c) to Rule 713 after
Priority Customer Orders on the book, and ahead of Responses,
Professional Orders, and other market maker quotes, until such time as
symbols are migrated to the INET trading system. The Exchange believes
that this language will reduce member confusion regarding how
allocations will be processed prior to the resolution of this systems
issue.
2. Statutory Basis
    The Exchange believes that the proposed rule change is consistent
with the requirements of the Act and the rules and regulations
thereunder that are applicable to a national securities exchange, and,
in particular, with the requirements of Section 6(b) of the Act.\4\

In particular, the proposal is consistent with Section 6(b)(5) of the
Act,\5\ because is designed to promote just and equitable principles of
trade, remove impediments to and perfect the mechanisms of a free and
open market and a national market system and, in general, to protect
investors and the public interest.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \4\ 15 U.S.C. 78f(b).
    \5\ 15 U.S.C. 78f(b)(5).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    The Exchange believes that the proposed rule change is consistent
with the protection of investors and the public interest because the
proposed rule language more accurately reflects the way contracts will
be allocated in the Flash auction until the systems issue is resolved.
Due to a systems issue, allocations in the Flash auction do not take
place in the manner described in Supplementary Material .02(a)-(b) to
Rule 1901. The proposed rule change makes this clear in the Exchange's
rules, and supplements notifications given to members and the
Commission pursuant to Regulation SCI. While the Exchange intends to
allocate contracts in the Flash auction as described in Supplementary
Material .02(a)-(b) to Rule 1901, the Exchange is taking this temporary
measure to ensure that members are properly notified of the current
system behavior. The proposed rule change does not make any permanent
changes to the Exchange's treatment of Flash auction allocations, which
will be processed correctly when the Exchange migrates its trading
system to INET in Q3 2017. The Exchange believes that the proposed rule
change will promote just and equitable principles of trade since it is
a temporary change, and is designed solely to provide additional
notification and clarity to members of the Flash auction allocation
issue. The Exchange intends to amend the manner in which the system
operates to conform to the current rule text as symbols migrate to INET
in Q3 2017.

B. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement on Burden on Competition

    In accordance with Section 6(b)(8) of the Act,\6\ the Exchange does
not believe that the proposed rule change will impose any burden on
intermarket or intramarket competition that is not necessary or
appropriate in furtherance of the purposes of the Act. The proposed
rule change is designed to more accurately reflect the way the trading
system allocates contracts in the Flash auction today, and is not
intended to be a permanent rule of the Exchange. The Flash auction
allocation will be corrected with the migration of the Exchange to INET
technology, and the proposed rule change is being filed solely to
provide additional notice to members in the interim. The proposed rule
change is therefore not designed to impose any significant burden on
competition.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \6\ 15 U.S.C. 78f(b)(8).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

C. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement on Comments on the Proposed
Rule Change Received From Members, Participants, or Others

    No written comments were either solicited or received.

III. Date of Effectiveness of the Proposed Rule Change and Timing for
Commission Action

    Because the foregoing proposed rule change does not: (i)
Significantly affect the protection of investors or the public
interest; (ii) impose any significant burden on competition; and (iii)
become operative for 30 days from the date on which it was filed, or
such shorter time as the Commission may designate, it has become
effective pursuant to Section 19(b)(3)(A)(iii) of the Act \7\ and
subparagraph (f)(6) of Rule 19b-4 thereunder.\8\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \7\ 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(3)(A)(iii).
    \8\ 17 CFR 240.19b-4(f)(6). In addition, Rule 19b-4(f)(6)
requires a self-regulatory organization to give the Commission
written notice of its intent to file the proposed rule change at
least five business days prior to the date of filing of the proposed
rule change, or such shorter time as designated by the Commission.
The Exchange has satisfied this requirement.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    A proposed rule change filed under Rule 19b-4(f)(6) normally does
not become operative for 30 days after the date of filing. However,
Rule 19b-4(f)(6)(iii) \9\ permits the Commission to designate a shorter
time if such action is consistent with the protection of investors and
the public interest. In its filing with the Commission, the Exchange
requests that the Commission waive the 30-day operative delay. The
Exchange represents that it filed the proposed rule change to provide
additional notice to members concerning the current handling of orders
and quotes executed in a Flash auction, and that waiver of the
operative delay is consistent with the protection of investors and the
public interest as it will allow the Exchange to immediately reflect in
its rules the allocation methodology currently in place for Flash
auctions. The Exchange further represents that the allocation
methodology will be fixed once the Exchange migrates to the INET
platform. The Commission believes that waiving the 30-day operative
delay is consistent with the protection of investors and the public
interest. Therefore, the Commission designates the proposed rule change
operative upon filing.\10\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \9\ 17 CFR 240.19b-4(f)(6)(iii).
    \10\ For purposes only of waiving the 30-day operative delay,
the Commission has considered the proposed rule's impact on
efficiency, competition, and capital formation. See 15 U.S.C.
78c(f).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    At any time within 60 days of the filing of the proposed rule
change, the Commission summarily may temporarily suspend such rule
change if it appears to the Commission that such action is: (i)
Necessary or appropriate in the public interest; (ii) for the
protection of investors; or (iii) otherwise in furtherance of the
purposes of the Act. If the Commission takes such action, the
Commission shall institute proceedings to determine whether the
proposed rule should be approved or disapproved.

IV. Solicitation of Comments

    Interested persons are invited to submit written data, views, and
arguments concerning the foregoing, including whether the proposed rule
change is consistent with the Act. Comments may be submitted by any of
the following methods:

Electronic Comments

     Use the Commission's Internet comment form (http://www.sec.gov/rules/sro.shtml); or
     Send an email to<EMAIL_ADDRESS>Please include
File Number SR-MRX-2017-07 on the subject line.

Paper Comments

     Send paper comments in triplicate to Secretary, Securities
and Exchange Commission, 100 F Street NE., Washington, DC 20549-1090.

All submissions should refer to File Number SR-MRX-2017-07. This file
number should be included on the subject line if email is used. To help
the Commission process and review your comments more efficiently,
please use only one method. The Commission will post all comments on
the Commission's Internet Web site (http://www.sec.gov/rules/sro.shtml). Copies of the submission, all subsequent amendments, all
written statements with respect to the proposed rule change that are
filed with the Commission, and all written communications relating to
the proposed rule change between the Commission and any person, other
than those that may be withheld from the public in accordance with the
provisions of 5 U.S.C. 552, will be available for Web site viewing and
printing in the Commission's Public Reference Room, 100 F Street NE.,
Washington, DC 20549, on official business days between the hours of

10:00 a.m. and 3:00 p.m. Copies of the filing also will be available
for inspection and copying at the principal office of the Exchange. All
comments received will be posted without change; the Commission does
not edit personal identifying information from submissions. You should
submit only information that you wish to make available publicly. All
submissions should refer to File Number SR-MRX-2017-07 and should be
submitted on or before July 14, 2017.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \11\ 17 CFR 200.30-3(a)(12).

    For the Commission, by the Division of Trading and Markets,
pursuant to delegated authority.\11\
Eduardo A. Aleman,
Assistant Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2017-13096 Filed 6-22-17; 8:45 am]
 BILLING CODE 8011-01-P


[Federal Register: March 31, 2010 (Volume 75, Number 61)]
[Notices]
[Page 16221-16222]
[DOCID:fr31mr10-149]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

[Release No. 34-61766; File No. SR-NASDAQ-2010-035]

Self-Regulatory Organizations; The NASDAQ Stock Market LLC;
Notice of Filing of Proposed Rule Change To Establish Strike Price
Intervals and Trading Hours for Options on Index-Linked Securities

March 23, 2010.
    Pursuant to Section 19(b)(1) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934
(``Act'' or ``Exchange Act'') \1\ and Rule 19b-4 thereunder,\2\ notice
is hereby given that on March 11, 2010, The NASDAQ Stock Market LLC
(``NASDAQ'' or ``Exchange'') filed with the Securities and Exchange
Commission (``Commission'') the proposed rule change as described in
Items I, II, and III below, which Items have been prepared by the
Exchange. The Commission is publishing this notice to solicit comments
on the proposed rule change from interested persons.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \1\ 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(1).
    \2\ 17 CFR 240.19b-4.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

I. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement of the Terms of Substance
of the Proposed Rule Change

    NASDAQ is filing with the Securities and Exchange Commission
(``SEC'' or ``Commission'') a proposal for the NASDAQ Options Market
(``NOM'' or ``Exchange'') to amend: Chapter IV, Section 6 (Series of
Options Contracts Open for Trading) to establish strike-price intervals
for options on Index-Linked Securities; \3\ and Chapter VI, Section 2
(Days and Hours of Business) to establish trading hours for these
products. The text of the proposed rule change is available on NASDAQ's
Web site at http://nasdaq.cchwallstreet.com/Filings/, on the
Commission's Web site at http://www.sec.gov, at NASDAQ, and at the
Commission's Public Reference Room.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \3\ Index-Linked Securities, also known as exchange-traded
notes, are long-term notes that are the non-convertible debt of an
issuer with a term of at least one year but not greater than thirty
years. These exchange-traded securities are designed for investors
who desire to participate in a specific market segment by providing
exposure to one or more identifiable underlying securities,
commodities, currencies, derivative instruments or market indexes.
The Exchange's listing standards for options on Index-Linked
Securities were established in May 2009. See Securities Exchange Act
Release No. 59923 (May 14, 2009), 74 FR 23902 (May 21, 2009) (SR-
NASDAQ-2009-046) (notice of filing and immediate effectiveness).
Other exchanges have established similar listing standards. See
Securities Exchange Act Release Nos. 58571 (September 17, 2008), 73
FR 55188 (September 24, 2008) (SR-Phlx-2008-60) (notice of filing
and immediate effectiveness); 58204 (July 22, 2008), 73 FR 43807
(July 28, 2008) (SR-CBOE-2008-64) (approval order); 58203 (July 22,
2008), 73 FR 43812 (July 28, 2008) (SR-NYSEArca-2008-57) (approval
order); and 58985 (November 20, 2008), 73 FR 72538 (November 28,
2008) (SR-ISE-2008-86) (notice of filing and immediate
effectiveness).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

II. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement of the Purpose of, and
Statutory Basis for, the Proposed Rule Change

    In its filing with the Commission, the self-regulatory organization
included statements concerning the purpose of, and basis for, the
proposed rule change and discussed any comments it received on the
proposed rule change. The text of those statements may be examined at
the places specified in Item IV below. The Exchange has prepared
summaries, set forth in sections A, B, and C below, of the most
significant parts of such statements.

A. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement of the Purpose of, and
Statutory Basis for, the Proposed Rule Change

1. Purpose
    The purpose of this proposal is to amend Chapter IV, Section 6 and
Chapter VI, Section 2 to establish strike price intervals and trading
hours for options on Index-Linked Securities (``ILS''), also known as
exchange-traded notes (``ETN''), prior to the Exchange proposing to
list and trade these new products.
    The Commission has approved the Exchange's proposal, as well as the
proposals of other options exchanges, to enable the listing and trading
of options on ILS (ETN).\4\ Options trading has not commenced to date
and is contingent upon the Commission's approval of The Options
Clearing Corporation's (``OCC'') proposed supplement to the Options
Disclosure Document (``ODD'') that will provide disclosure regarding
options on Index-Linked Securities.\5\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \4\ See supra note 3.
    \5\ OCC previously received Commission approval to clear options
based on Index-Linked Securities. See Securities Exchange Act
Release No. 60872 (October 23, 2009), 74 FR 55878 (October 29, 2009)
(SR-OCC-2009-14) (approval order).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

$1 Strikes for ILS (ETN) Options
    Prior to the commencement of trading options on Index-Linked
Securities, the Exchange is proposing to establish that strike price
intervals of $1 will be permitted where the strike price is less than
$200. Where the strike price is greater than $200, $5 strikes will be
permitted. These proposed changes are reflected by the addition of
Chapter IV, Section 6, Supplementary Material .01(c) to Section 6.
    The Exchange is seeking to establish $1 strikes for ILS (ETN)
options where the strike price is less than $200 because the Exchange
believes the marketplace and investors will be expecting these types of
options to trade in a similar manner to options on exchange-traded
funds (``ETFs'').\6\ Strike prices for ETF options are permitted in $1
or greater intervals where the strike price is $200 or less and $5 or
greater where the strike price is greater than $200.\7\ Accordingly,
the Exchange believes that the rationale for permitting $1 strikes for
ETF options equally applies to permitting $1 strikes for ILS (ETN)
options, and that investors will be better served if $1 strike price
intervals are available for ILS (ETN) options where the strike price is
less than $200. The Exchange believes that $1 strike price intervals
for options on Index-Linked Securities will provide investors with
greater flexibility by allowing them to establish positions that are
better tailored to meet their investment objectives.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \6\ ETFs may also be known in the rules as Exchange Traded Funds
or Fund Shares. See, for example, Chapter IV, Section 6(g) and
Chapter 6, Section 2(b).
    \7\ See proposed Chapter IV, Section 6, Supplementary Material
.01(b) to Section 6, which, like subsection (c), is renumbered for
internal consistency.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

Trading Hours for ILS (ETN) Options
    The Exchange proposes to amend Chapter VI, Section 2(b) to provide
that options contracts on exchange-traded notes including Index-Linked
Securities, as defined in Chapter IV, Section 3(l), may be traded on
the Exchange until 4:15 p.m. each business day. This will establish
similar trading hours for ILS (ETN) options as the currently-
established trading hours for ETF options.\8\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \8\ See Chapter VI, Section 2.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    The Exchange has analyzed its capacity and believes the Exchange
and the Options Price Reporting Authority (``OPRA'') have the necessary
systems capacity to handle the additional traffic associated with the
listing and trading

of $1 strikes where the strike price is less than $200 for ILS (ETN)
options.
    The Exchange expects that other option exchanges that have adopted
rules providing for the listing and trading of options on Index-Linked
Securities will submit similar proposals.\9\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \9\ See, for example, Securities Exchange Act Release No. 61466
(February 2, 2010), 75 FR 6243 (February 8, 2010) (SR-CBOE-2010-005)
(notice of filing).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

2. Statutory Basis
    The Exchange believes that its proposal is consistent with Section
6(b) of the Act \10\ in general, and furthers the objectives of Section
6(b)(5) of the Act \11\ in particular, in that it is designed to
prevent fraudulent and manipulative acts and practices, to promote just
and equitable principles of trade, to foster cooperation and
coordination with persons engaged in facilitating transactions in
securities, and to remove impediments to and perfect the mechanisms of
a free and open market and a national market system, by having strike
price intervals and trading hours established prior to the commencement
of trading in options on Index-Linked Securities and thereby lessening
the likelihood for investor confusion.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \10\ 15 U.S.C. 78f(b).
    \11\ 15 U.S.C. 78f(b)(5).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

B. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement on Burden on Competition

    The Exchange does not believe that the proposed rule change will
impose any burden on competition not necessary or appropriate in
furtherance of the purposes of the Act.

C. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement on Comments on the Proposed
Rule Change Received From Members, Participants or Others

    Written comments were neither solicited nor received.

III. Date of Effectiveness of the Proposed Rule Change and Timing for
Commission Action

    Within 35 days of the date of publication of this notice in the
Federal Register or within such longer period (i) as the Commission may
designate up to 90 days of such date if it finds such longer period to
be appropriate and publishes its reasons for so finding or (ii) as to
which the self-regulatory organization consents, the Commission will:
    (A) By order approve the proposed rule change, or
    (B) Institute proceedings to determine whether the proposed rule
change should be disapproved.

IV. Solicitation of Comments

    Interested persons are invited to submit written data, views, and
arguments concerning the foregoing, including whether the proposed rule
change is consistent with the Act. Comments may be submitted by any of
the following methods:

Electronic Comments

     Use the Commission's Internet comment form (http://
www.sec.gov/rules/sro.shtml); or
     Send an e-mail to<EMAIL_ADDRESS>Please include
File No. SR-NASDAQ-2010-035 on the subject line.

Paper Comments

     Send paper comments in triplicate to Elizabeth M. Murphy,
Secretary, Securities and Exchange Commission, Station Place, 100 F
Street, NE., Washington, DC 20549-1090.

All submissions should refer to File Number SR-NASDAQ-2010-035. This
file number should be included on the subject line if e-mail is used.
To help the Commission process and review your comments more
efficiently, please use only one method. The Commission will post all
comments on the Commission's Internet Web site (http://www.sec.gov/
rules/sro.shtml). Copies of the submission, all subsequent amendments,
all written statements with respect to the proposed rule change that
are filed with the Commission, and all written communications relating
to the proposed rule change between the Commission and any person,
other than those that may be withheld from the public in accordance
with the provisions of 5 U.S.C. 552, will be available for Web site
viewing and printing in the Commission's Public Reference Room, on
official business days between the hours of 10 a.m. and 3 p.m. Copies
of such filing also will be available for inspection and copying at the
principal office of the Exchange. All comments received will be posted
without change; the Commission does not edit personal identifying
information from submissions. You should submit only information that
you wish to make available publicly. All submissions should refer to
File Number SR-NASDAQ-2010-035 and should be submitted on or before
April 15, 2010.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \12\ 17 CFR 200.30-3(a)(12).

    For the Commission, by the Division of Trading and Markets,
pursuant to delegated authority.\12\
Florence E. Harmon,
Deputy Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2010-7105 Filed 3-30-10; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 8011-01-P