[Federal Register: March 24, 2009 (Volume 74, Number 55)]
[Notices]
[Page 12354-12355]
[DOCID:fr24mr09-59]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission

Notice of Intent To File License Application, Filing of Pre-
Application Document, and Approving Use of the Traditional Licensing
Process Procedures

March 16, 2009.

------------------------------------------------------------------------

------------------------------------------------------------------------
FFP Project 3, LLC........................  Project No. 12856-001.
FFP Project 4, LLC........................  Project No. 12849-001.
FFP Project 5, LLC........................  Project No. 12862-001.
FFP Project 6, LLC........................  Project No. 12848-001.
FFP Project 7, LLC........................  Project No. 12851-001.
Free Flow Power Corporation...............  Project No. 12833-001.
FFP Project 10, LLC.......................  Project No. 12866-001.
FFP Project 11, LLC.......................  Project No. 12855-001.
FFP Project 12, LLC.......................  Project No. 12853-001.
FFP Project 13, LLC.......................  Project No. 12854-001.
FFP Project 14, LLC.......................  Project No. 12845-001.
FFP Project 15, LLC.......................  Project No. 12864-001.
FFP Project 16, LLC.......................  Project No. 12858-001.
FFP Project 17, LLC.......................  Project No. 12865-001.
FFP Project 18, LLC.......................  Project No. 12857-001.
FFP Project 19, LLC.......................  Project No. 12842-001.
FFP Project 20, LLC.......................  Project No. 12869-001.
FFP Project 21, LLC.......................  Project No. 12863-001.
FFP Project 22, LLC.......................  Project No. 12860-001.
FFP Project 23, LLC.......................  Project No. 12843-001.
FFP Project 24, LLC.......................  Project No. 12844-001.
Free Flow Power Corporation...............  Project No. 12828-001.
Free Flow Power Corporation...............  Project No. 12822-001.
Free Flow Power Corporation...............  Project No. 12817-001.
FFP Project 29, LLC.......................  Project No. 12918-001.
FFP Project 30, LLC.......................  Project No. 12927-001.
FFP Project 37, LLC.......................  Project No. 12928-001.
FFP Project 38, LLC.......................  Project No. 12926-001.
FFP Project 39, LLC.......................  Project No. 12925-001.
FFP Project 40, LLC.......................  Project No. 12929-001.
FFP Project 43, LLC.......................  Project No. 12931-001.
FFP Project 44, LLC.......................  Project No. 12942-001.
FFP Project 45, LLC.......................  Project No. 12937-001.
FFP Project 46, LLC.......................  Project No. 12936-001.
FFP Project 47, LLC.......................  Project No. 12932-001.
FFP Project 48, LLC.......................  Project No. 12934-001.
FFP Project 49, LLC.......................  Project No. 12933-001.
FFP Project 50, LLC.......................  Project No. 12941-001.
FFP Project 51, LLC.......................  Project No. 12940-001.
FFP Project 52, LLC.......................  Project No. 12939-001.
FFP Project 53, LLC.......................  Project No. 12914-001.
FFP Project 55, LLC.......................  Project No. 12917-001.
FFP Project 58, LLC.......................  Project No. 12913-001.
FFP Project 59, LLC.......................  Project No. 12916-001.
------------------------------------------------------------------------

    a. Type of Filing: Notice of Intent To File License Application and
Request To Use the Traditional Licensing Process (TLP).
    b. Project Nos.: P-12856, P-12849, P-12862, P-12848, P-12851, P-
12833, P-12866, P-12855, P-12853, P-12854, P-12845, P-12864, P-12858,
P-12865, P-12857, P-12842, P-12869, P-12863, P-12860, P-12843, P-12844,
P-12828, P-12822, P-12817, P-12918, P-12927, P-12928, P-12926, P-12925,
P-12929, P-12931, P-12942, P-12937, P-12936, P-12932, P-12934, P-12933,
P-12941, P-12940, P-12939, P-12914, P-12917, P-12913, and P-12916.
    c. Dated Filed: January 15, 2009.
    d. Submitted By: Free Flow Power Corporation and the subsidiary
limited liability corporations (listed above and collectively referred
to below as ``Free Flow Power'').
    e. Name of Projects: Free Flow Power Mississippi River TLP
Projects.
    f. Locations: On the Mississippi River, in Arkansas, Illinois,
Kentucky, Louisiana, Mississippi, Missouri, and Tennessee. No federal
lands are occupied by the project works or located within the project
boundary.
    g. Filed Pursuant to: 18 CFR 5.3 of the Commission's regulations.
    h. Potential Applicant Contact: Ms. Ramya Swaminathan, Vice
President, Free Flow Power, 33 Commercial Street, Gloucester, MA 01930,
(978) 226-1531<EMAIL_ADDRESS>    i. FERC Contact: Stephen Bowler at<PHONE_NUMBER> or
<EMAIL_ADDRESS>and Sarah Florentino at<PHONE_NUMBER> or
<EMAIL_ADDRESS>    j. Free Flow Power filed its request to use the Traditional
Licensing Process on January 15, 2009. On March 13, 2009, Free Flow
Power filed a supplement to its PAD. In a letter dated March 16, 2009,
the Director of the Office of Energy Projects approved Free Flow Power
Corporation's request to use the Traditional Licensing Process.
    k. With this notice, we are initiating informal consultation with:
(a) The U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service under section 7 of the
Endangered Species Act and the joint agency regulations thereunder at
50 C.F.R., Part 402; (b) NOAA Fisheries under section 305(b) of the
Magnuson-Stevens Fishery Conservation and Management Act and
implementing regulations at 50 CFR 600.920; and (c) the State Historic
Preservation Officers of Arkansas, Illinois, Kentucky, Louisiana,
Mississippi, Missouri, and Tennessee, as required by section 106,
National Historical Preservation Act, and the implementing regulations
of the Advisory Council on Historic Preservation at 36 CFR 800.2.
    l. With this notice, we are designating Free Flow Power Corporation
as the Commission's non-federal representative for carrying out
informal consultation, pursuant to section 106 of the National Historic
Preservation Act.
    m. Free Flow Power Corporation filed a Pre-Application Document
(PAD; including a proposed process plan and schedule) with the
Commission, pursuant to 18 CFR 5.6 of the Commission's regulations.
    n. A copy of the PAD is available for review at the Commission in
the Public Reference Room or may be viewed on the Commission's Web site
(http://www.ferc.gov), using the ``eLibrary'' link. Enter the docket
number, excluding the last three digits in the docket number field to
access the document. For assistance, contact FERC Online Support at
<EMAIL_ADDRESS>or toll free at 1-866-208-3676, of for TTY,
(202) 502-8659. A copy is also available for inspection and
reproduction at the address in paragraph h.
    Register online at http://ferc.gov/esubscribenow.htm to be notified
via e-mail of new filing and issuances related

to this or other pending projects. For assistance, contact FERC Online
Support.

Kimberly D. Bose,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. E9-6282 Filed 3-23-09; 8:45 am]


Triadimefon Dietary Exposure Assessment  RED DP Barcode: 314778 Page 1 of 36 UNITED STATES ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY WASHINGTON, D. C. 20460 OFFICE OF PREVENTION, PESTICIDE AND TOXIC SUBSTANCES MEMORANDUM Date: July 6, 2006 Subject: Triadimefon: Revised Acute, Probabilistic and Chronic Dietary ( Food + Drinking Water) Exposure and Risk Assessments for the Triadimefon Reregistration.

DP Barcode: D314778 PC Code: 109901 40 CFR § : 180.410 Chemical Class: Azole From: Yvonne Barnes, Chemist Reregistration Branch II and Sheila Piper, Chemist Chemistry and Exposure Branch Health Effects Division ( 7509P)

Through: Douglas Dotson, Chemist Dietary Exposure Science Advisory Council ( DESAC) Health Effects Division ( 7509P) and Alan Nielsen, Branch Senior Scientist William J. Hazel, Branch Chief Reregistration Branch II Health Effects Division ( 7509P)

To: Richard Griffin, Risk Assessor Reregistration Branch II Health Effects Division ( 7509P) and John Pates, Chemical Review Manager Reregistration Branch I Special Review and Reregistration Division ( 7508P) Triadimefon Dietary Exposure Assessment  RED DP Barcode: 314778 Page 2 of 36 Executive Summary Revised acute and chronic dietary ( food and water) exposure and risk assessments were conducted using the Dietary Exposure Evaluation Model software with the Food Commodity Intake Database ( DEEM FCID   , Version 2.03), which uses food consumption data from the U. S. Department of Agriculture's Continuing Surveys of Food Intakes by Individuals ( CSFII) from 1994 1996 and 1998. The analyses were performed as part of the registrant, Bayer CropScience's acute and chronic dietary assessment ( A. M. Bloomberg, 5 MAY 2006, ID# 201513) for triadimefon and response to Bayer's comments will be addressed in a separate memo. This dietary exposure and risk assessments for triadimefon include the following: the latest monitoring data for pears, pineapples and raspberries, and new drinking water scenarios provided by the Environmental Fate and Effects Division ( EFED).

Acute Dietary Exposure Results and Characterization of Input Data A highly refined probabilistic acute dietary exposure assessment was conducted to estimate the dietary risks associated with the reregistration of triadimefon. The acute dietary exposure assessment incorporated processing factors and percent crop treated (% CT) estimates provided by the Biological and Economic Analysis Division ( BEAD). The anticipated residue ( AR) estimates are based primarily on monitoring data. However, because monitoring data did not analyzed for all triadimefon metabolites, KWG 1323 and KWG 1342, the ratios of total toxic residues ( TTR) to triadimefon from available metabolism studies was used to estimate the total residues of concern. The sum of triadimefon and triadimenol was multiplied by the ratio 1.25 to account for metabolites, KWG 1323 and KWG 1342. The assessment includes surface water numbers from Florida turf ( tees/ greens; tees/ greens/ fairways; fairways only; and entire course) numbers and golf course adjustment factors ( GCAFs) were applied to surface water.

Food Alone The acute dietary exposure estimates from food alone are below HED's level of concern (< 100 % aPAD) at the 99.9th percentile of exposure. Triadimefon dietary exposure at the 99.9th percentile from food alone is 15% of the aPAD for the U. S. population and 49% of the aPAD for children 1 2 yrs, the most highly exposed population subgroup.

Food and Water The acute dietary exposure estimates from food and drinking water using the golf tees and greens applications for drinking water are below HED's level of concern (< 100% aPAD) at the 99.9th percentile of exposure. Triadimefon dietary exposure at the 99.9th percentile from food and drinking water is 32% of the aPAD for the U. S. population and 73% of the aPAD for all infants (< 1 yr), the most highly exposed population subgroup.

Chronic Dietary Exposure Results and Characterization of Input Data A highly refined chronic dietary exposure assessment was conducted to estimate the dietary risks associated with the reregistration of triadimefon. The chronic dietary exposure assessment incorporated percent crop treated (% CT) estimates provided by BEAD and processing factors. Triadimefon Dietary Exposure Assessment  RED DP Barcode: 314778 Page 3 of 36 The AR estimates are based primarily on PDP data. However, because PDP did not analyze for all triadimefon metabolites of concern, the ratio of TTR to triadimefon from available metabolism studies was used to estimate the total residues of concern. The assessment included the 1 in 10 year annual mean surface water numbers from Florida turf ( golf course) scenarios and ( GCAFs) applied to surface water.

Food Alone The chronic dietary exposure to triadimefon from food alone is below HED's level of concern (< 100% of the cPAD) for the U. S. population (< 1% of cPAD) and children 1 2 yrs ( 3% of the cPAD), the most highly exposed population subgroup.

Food and Water The chronic dietary exposure estimates from food and drinking water using the worst case ( entire golf course) application 1 in 10 year annual concentration are below HED's level of concern (< 100% cPAD) for the U. S. population and all population subgroups. Triadimefon dietary exposure from food and drinking water for the U. S. population is 14% of the cPAD and 46% of the cPAD for all infants (< 1 yr), the most highly exposed population subgroup.

Cancer Dietary Exposure Results and Characterization Triadimefon is classified as Category C " possible human carcinogen." No Q1* has been derived.

I. Introduction Dietary risk assessment incorporates both exposure and toxicity of a given pesticide. For acute and chronic assessments, the risk is expressed as a percentage of a maximum acceptable dose ( i. e., the dose which the Health Effects Division has concluded will result in no unreasonable adverse health effects). This dose is referred to as the population adjusted dose ( PAD). The PAD is equivalent to the Reference Dose ( RfD) divided by the special FQPA Safety Factor.

For acute and non cancer chronic exposures, HED is concerned when estimated dietary risk exceeds 100% of the PAD. References which discuss the acute and chronic dietary risk assessments in more detail are available on the EPA pesticides web site: " Available Information on Assessing Exposure from Pesticides, A User's Guide," 6/ 21/ 2000, web link: http:// www. epa. gov/ fedrgstr/ EPA PEST/ 2000/ July/ Day 12/ 6061. pdf; or see SOP 99.6 ( 8/ 20/ 1999).

The most recent dietary risk assessment for triadimefon was conducted by S. Ary ( DP Barcode D314778, 23 NOV 2005).

II. Residue Information Tolerances are established for residues of triadimefon [ 1( 4 chlorophenoxy) 3,3 dimethyl 1( 1H 1,2,4 triazol 1 yl) 2 butanone] and its metabolites containing chlorophenoxy and triazole moieties ( expressed as the parent compound) in/ on various plant and animal commodities [ 40 CFR § 180.410]. A tolerance with regional registration is established for triadimefon and its metabolites in raspberries at 2.0 ppm [ 40 CFR § 180.410( c)]. Triadimefon is a systemic fungicide Triadimefon Dietary Exposure Assessment  RED DP Barcode: 314778 Page 4 of 36 used to control rust and mildew on apples, grapes, pears, pineapple, and raspberries. The available crop field trials reflecting use of registered formulations at 1x the maximum label rate show finite residues of triadimefon and its metabolites triadimenol, KWG 1342, and KWG 1323 in/ on apples, grapes, pears, and pineapples and triadimefon and triadimenol in/ on raspberries.

The qualitative nature of triadimefon residues in plants is understood based on the adequate metabolism studies conducted with grapes, cucumbers, tomatoes, and wheat. The Health Effects Division ( HED) Metabolism Assessment Review Committee ( MARC) has determined that the residues of concern in plants are triadimefon, triadimenol, KWG 1323, KWG 1342, and, in wheat only, KWG 1732 ( S. Knizner, HED MARC memorandum, 1/ 3/ 1994). HED determined that only triadimefon and triadimenol in drinking water should be considered in the dietary risk assessment. Triadimefon is not registered for use as a direct livestock treatment and residues of triadimefon are not expected to be detected in the feed items. HED concluded that the supported uses on apples, grapes, pears, pineapples, and raspberries result in a 40 CFR § 180.6( a)( 3) situation for ruminant commodities; i. e., there is no reasonable expectation of finite residues in ruminant commodities. Therefore, tolerances in animal commodities are not required at the present time.

Residue Data used for Acute and Chronic Dietary Assessments The anticipated residue estimates are based primarily on monitoring data. However, because PDP and FDA did not analyze for all triadimefon metabolites of concern, the ratios of total toxic residues ( TTR) to triadimefon from available metabolism studies were used to estimate the total residues of concern. All triadimefon acute and chronic residue estimates for crop commodities are listed in Table 1. As stated above, the residues included in risk assessment include three of triadimefon's metabolites: triadimenol, KWG 1323, and KWG 1342. The monitoring data only analyzed for triadimefon and triadimenol in apples, grapes, pears, and pineapples. Since MARC concluded that triadimefon, triadimenol, KWG 1323, and KWG 1342 are residues of concern, residue data for these metabolites were needed for conducting a dietary risk assessment.

In order to estimate the total residues of triadimefon and all its metabolites, the concentrations of triadimefon and all its metabolites of concern ( termed Total Toxic Residue or TTR) were used. The metabolism study conducted with grapes was used based on the similarities of grapes to all the supported crops and the fact that it will produce a more conservative assessment than using the cucumber or tomato metabolism studies. To calculate the TRR in monitoring samples, the ratio of the TTR to triadimefon and triadimenol ( 1.25) from the grape metabolism study was used along with the reported triadimefon and triadimenol residues in monitoring samples. The sum of triadimefon and triadimenol was multiplied by the ratio 1.25 to account for metabolites, KWG 1323 and KWG 1342.

Residue Estimates for Individual Crops Apple: PDP data from 2003 were used for apples. A total of 744 samples were analyzed for triadimefon and triadimenol. Triadimefon was not detected in any samples and triadimenol was detected in 14 samples. The estimated maximum % CT for apples of 10% was used for the acute dietary risk assessment and the estimated average % CT of 5% was used for the chronic dietary risk assessments. The ratio of TTR/ triadimefon and triadimenol ( 1.25) from the grape metabolism Triadimefon Dietary Exposure Assessment  RED DP Barcode: 314778 Page 5 of 36 study was used to estimate the total residues of concern based on reported triadimefon and triadimenol residues in monitoring samples.

Grape: PDP data from 2004 were used for grapes. A total of 738 samples were analyzed for triadimefon and 212 samples were analyzed for triadimenol. Triadimefon was not detected in any samples and triadimenol was detected in 15 samples. The estimated maximum % CT for grapes of 5% was used for the acute dietary risk assessment and the estimated average % CT of 1% was used for the chronic dietary risk assessments. The ratio of TTR/ triadimefon and triadimenol ( 1.25) from the grape metabolism study was used to estimate the total residues of concern based on reported triadimefon and triadimenol residues in monitoring samples.

Pear: PDP data from 2003 and 2004 were used for pears. A total of 928 samples were analyzed for triadimefon and 270 samples were analyzed for triadimenol. Triadimefon and triadimenol were not detected in any samples. The estimated maximum % CT for pears of 5% was used for the acute dietary risk assessment and the estimated average % CT of 5% was used for the chronic dietary risk assessments. The ratio of TTR/ triadimefon and triadimenol ( 1.25) from the grape metabolism study was used to estimate the total residues of concern based on reported triadimefon and triadimenol residues in monitoring samples.

Pineapple: PDP data from 2002 was used for pineapples. A total of 360 samples were analyzed for triadimefon and 52 samples were analyzed for triadimenol. Triadimefon was detected in 16 samples and triadimenol was detected in 1 sample. The estimated % CT for pineapples of 100% was used for the acute and chronic dietary risk assessments. The ratio of TTR/ triadimefon and triadimenol ( 1.25) from the grape metabolism study was used to estimate the total residues of concern based on reported triadimefon and triadimenol residues in monitoring samples.

Raspberry: FDA data ( 1996 2003) was used for raspberries. A total of 320 samples were analyzed for triadimefon and triadimenol. A total of 20 samples contained triadimefon and/ or triadimenol residues. The estimated maximum % CT for raspberries of 50% was used for the acute dietary risk assessment and the estimated average % CT of 50% was used for the chronic dietary risk assessments. The ratio of TTR/ triadimefon and triadimenol ( 1.25) from the grape metabolism study was used to estimate the total residues of concern based on reported triadimefon and triadimenol residues in monitoring samples. Triadimefon Dietary Exposure Assessment  RED DP Barcode: 314778 Page 6 of 36 Table 1: Triadimefon Data and Residue Estimates Used in Dietary Analyses Anticipated Residue Estimates/ Tolerance RAC Classification1 Data Source Years No. of Samples No. of Detects % CT Avg. 2 % CT Max. 2 Processing Factors3 Acute ( Tol., AR, RDF) Chronic and Cancer ( Tol., AR)

Apple NB or PB PDP ( 1.25x factor) 2003 744 14 5 10 juice at 0.6 RDF# 1 TOTALZ= 670 TOTALLOD= 60 LODRES= 0.00125 0.008 0.004 8, 0.006 4, 0.003 AR ( 0.00014)

Apple B PDP ( 1.25x factor) 2003 744 14 5 10 dried at 8.0 RDF# 2 TOTALZ= 0 TOTALLOD= 730 LODRES= 0.00125 0.008 0.004 8, 0.006 4, 0.003 AR ( 0.0013)

Grape PB PDP ( 1.25x factor) 2004 738 15 1 5 raisin at 4.0 RDF# 3 TOTALZ= 701 TOTALLOD= 22 LODRES= 0.025 0.083 0.916 0.291 0.097 11, 0.049 AR ( 0.027)

Pear NB or PB PDP ( 1.25x factor) 2003 04 928 0 5 5 dried at 6.25 RDF # 4 TOTALZ= 882 TOTALLOD= 46 LODRES= 0.025 AR ( 0.001)

Pineapple NB or PB PDP ( 1.25x factor) 2002 360 17 100 100 dried at 5.0 RDF # 5 TOTALZ= 0 TOTALLOD= 343 LODRES= 0.025 0.47 0.062 15,0.024 AR ( 0.001)

Raspberry PB FDA ( 1.25x factor) 1996 2003 320 20 50 50 N/ A RDF # 6 TOTALZ= 160 TOTALLOD= 140 LODRES= 0.005 0.1225 0.425 2,0.7775 0.244 3,0.1 0.3 0.125 0.189 0.325 0.375 0.0375 0.363 0.238 0.4 1.1 0.638 0.188 AR ( 0.024)

1. Classification of blended ( B), partially blended ( PB), not blended ( NB). 2. When no data were available for percent crop treated (% CT) average, 100% CT was used in the dietary assessment. 3. Processing study information may be found in the Chemistry Review Document under guideline section 860.1520 Processed Food and Feed ( S. Ary, D314742, 9/ 16/ 2005). Triadimefon Dietary Exposure Assessment  RED DP Barcode: 314778 Page 7 of 36 Processing Factors Data from the processing studies were used in this assessment for several commodities along with DEEM 7.81 default processing factor for dried apple ( 8.0x), dried pear ( 6.25x), and dried pineapple ( 5.0x). Acceptable processing studies are available for apples, grapes, and pineapple. A processing factor of 0.6x was utilized for apple juice and 4.0x for raisin. All other processed commodities showed little or no concentration in the available processing studies. For detailed considerations of processing factors see " Triadimefon. Summary of Analytical Chemistry and Residue Data for the Reregistration Eligibility Decision ( RED) Document" under guideline section 860.1520 ( S. Ary, D314742, 9/ 16/ 2005).

Usage Information Dietary risk estimates are based, in part, on estimates of the percent usage of triadimefon on apples, grapes, pears, pineapples, and raspberries. BEAD has estimated triadimefon use ( J. Carter, SLUA, 2 JUN 2005) based on available pesticide survey usage data for the years 1997 to 2003 ( Attachment 22). BEAD estimates are provided to HED as an average and as an estimated maximum. The estimated maximum % CT was used for the acute dietary risk assessment and the estimated average % CT was used for the chronic dietary risk assessments.

III. Drinking Water Data The drinking water values used in the dietary risk assessment were provided by the Environmental Fate and Effects Division ( EFED) in the following memorandum: " Tier 2 Drinking Water Assessment for Triadimefon and its Major Degradate Triadimenol" ( J. Angier, D316941, 31 AUG 2005). Water residues were incorporated in the DEEM FCID   into the food categories " water, direct, all sources" and " water, indirect, all sources."

The estimated drinking water concentrations ( EDWCs) for triadimefon and triadimenol were moderately refined and calculated using PRZM ( Pesticide Root Zone Model) and EXAMS ( Exposure Analysis Modeling System) for use in the human health risk assessment. The estimated groundwater concentrations for triadimefon were unrefined and calculated using SCI GROW ( Screening Concentration In Ground Water); however, these were not used in the assessment because residues are shown to be much higher in surface water.

In the previous dietary assessment, the EDWCs were calculated from the Oregon Christmas tree, Pennsylvania apple, and Florida turf scenarios. A default Percent Cropped Area ( PCA) factor of 0.87 ( 87%) was applied to all the scenarios except turf, for which 100% of area is considered ( no adjustment). The FL turf scenario using PRZM/ EXAMS model, produced the highest concentrations and the acute and chronic dietary assessments exceeded HED's level of concern.

As requested by SRRD, additional Florida turf ( golf course) scenarios were estimated and golf course adjustment factors ( GCAFs) were applied ( Table 2). The GCAFs are meant to elucidate what the expected surface water concentrations would be if only certain parts of a golf course received triadimefon applications at turf use rates, rather than 100% of the area receiving Triadimefon Dietary Exposure Assessment  RED DP Barcode: 314778 Page 8 of 36 application. Explicit label changes would need to be implemented before any results from this data set could be considered applicable to a risk assessment.

Table 2. Surface Water Concentrations for FL Turf Scenarios with Golf Course Adjustment Factors Use Scenario Portion of golf course that is treated Acute ( ppb) 1 in 10 yr annual mean ( ppb) 30 yr overall mean ( ppb)

3 applications 14 day interval 5.5 lbs product ( 2 oz/ 1000 ft2) Tees/ greens Tees/ Greens/ Fairways Fairways Entire course 4.9 33 28.1 97 1.1 7.5 6.4 22 0.75 5.1 4.35 15 IV. DEEM FCID   Program and Consumption Information Triadimefon acute and chronic dietary exposure assessments were conducted using the Dietary Exposure Evaluation Model software with the Food Commodity Intake Database ( DEEMFCID   , Version 2.03), which incorporates consumption data from USDA's Continuing Surveys of Food Intakes by Individuals ( CSFII), 1994 1996 and 1998. The 1994 96, 98 data are based on the reported consumption of more than 20,000 individuals over two non consecutive survey days. Foods " as consumed" ( e. g., apple pie) are linked to EPA defined food commodities ( e. g. apples, peeled fruit  cooked; fresh or N/ S; baked; or wheat flour  cooked; fresh or N/ S, baked) using publicly available recipe translation files developed jointly by USDA/ ARS and EPA. For chronic exposure assessment, consumption data are averaged for the entire U. S. population and within population subgroups, but for acute exposure assessment are retained as individual consumption events. Based on analysis of the 1994 96, 98 CSFII consumption data, which took into account dietary patterns and survey respondents, HED concluded that it is most appropriate to report risk for the following population subgroups: the general U. S. population, all infants ( less than 1 year old), children 1 2, children 3 5, children 6 12, youth 13 19, adults 20 49, females 13 49, and adults 50+ years old.

For chronic dietary exposure assessment, an estimate of the residue level in each food or foodform ( e. g., orange or orange juice) on the food commodity residue list is multiplied by the average daily consumption estimate for that food/ food form to produce a residue intake estimate. The resulting residue intake estimate for each food/ food form is summed with the residue intake estimates for all other food/ food forms on the commodity residue list to arrive at the total average estimated exposure. Exposure is expressed in mg/ kg body weight/ day and as a percent of the cPAD. This procedure is performed for each population subgroup.

For acute exposure assessments, individual one day food consumption data are used on an individual by individual basis. The reported consumption amounts of each food item can be multiplied by a residue point estimate and summed to obtain a total daily pesticide exposure for a deterministic exposure assessment, or " matched" in multiple random pairings with residue values and then summed in a probabilistic assessment. The resulting distribution of exposures is Triadimefon Dietary Exposure Assessment  RED DP Barcode: 314778 Page 9 of 36 expressed as a percentage of the aPAD on both a user ( i. e., only those who reported eating relevant commodities/ food forms) and a per capita ( i. e., those who reported eating the relevant commodities as well as those who did not) basis. In accordance with HED policy, per capita exposure and risk are reported for all tiers of analysis. However, for tiers 1 and 2, any significant differences in user vs. per capita exposure and risk are specifically identified and noted in the risk assessment.

V. Toxicological Information Both the acute and chronic exposure estimates for triadimefon were evaluated based on a NOAEL of 3.4 mg/ kg/ day from a subchronic neurotoxicity study in rats ( R. Griffin, D325542, 23 JAN 2006). A summary of the toxicological doses and endpoints selected for the dietary exposure assessments is provided in Table 3.

Table 3. Summary of Toxicological Doses and Endpoints for Triadimefon Exposure Scenario Dose Used in Risk Assessment, UF FQPA SF and Level of Concern for Risk Assessment Study and Toxicological Effects Acute Dietary ( general population) NOAEL = 3.4 mg/ kg/ day UF = 1000 Acute RfD = 0.0034 mg/ kg/ day FQPA SF = 1X aPAD = acute RfD FQPA SF aPAD = 0.0034 mg/ kg/ day Subchronic neurotoxicity study in rats. LOAEL = 54.6/ 68.7 mg/ kg/ day based largely on hyperactivity.

Chronic Dietary ( all populations) NOAEL = 3.4 mg/ kg/ day UF = 1000 Chronic RfD = 0.0034 mg/ kg/ day FQPA SF = 1X PAD = chronic RfD FQPA SF cPAD = 0.0034 mg/ kg/ day Subchronic neurotoxicity study in rats. LOAEL = 54.6/ 68.7 mg/ kg/ day based largely on hyperactivity.

Cancer ( oral, dermal, inhalation) Classification: Category C " possible human carcinogen" based on statistically significant increase in thyroid adenomas in male Wistar rats and statistically significant increases in hepatocellular adenomas in both sexes of the NMRI mouse.

UF = uncertainty factor, FQPA SF = FQPA safety factor, NOAEL = no observed adverse effect level, LOAEL = lowest observed adverse effect level, PAD = population adjusted dose ( a = acute, c = chronic) RfD = reference dose VI. Results/ Discussion As stated above, for acute and chronic assessments, HED is concerned when dietary risk exceeds 100% of the PAD. The DEEM FCID   analyses estimate the dietary exposure of the U. S. population and various population subgroups. The acute and chronic dietary exposure analyses results reported in Tables 4, 6 and 7, respectively are for the general U. S. population, all infants ( less than 1 year old), children 1 2, children 3 5, children 6 12, youth 13 19, adults 20 49, adults 50+ years, and females 13 49. Triadimefon Dietary Exposure Assessment  RED DP Barcode: 314778 Page 10 of 36 Results of Acute Dietary Exposure Analysis The acute dietary exposure estimates from food alone are below HED's level of concern (< 100 % aPAD) at the 99.9th percentile of exposure ( Table 4). Triadimefon dietary exposure at the 99.9th percentile from food alone is 15% of the aPAD for the U. S. population and 49% of the aPAD for children 1 2 yrs, the most highly exposed population subgroup.

The acute dietary exposure estimates from combined food and drinking water using the golf tees and greens applications for drinking water are below HED's level of concern (< 100% aPAD) at the 99.9th percentile of exposure ( Table 5). Triadimefon dietary exposure at the 99.9th percentile from food and drinking water is 32% of the aPAD for the U. S. population and 73% of the aPAD for all infants (< 1 yr), the most highly exposed population subgroup.

For comparison, the estimated surface water point estimates using a typical number of 3 applications of 2.75 lbs ai/ A were incorporated into the acute dietary exposure assessment. For golf course fairways; tees, greens and fairways; and entire golf course, the acute dietary risk estimates exceed HED's level of concern at the 99.9th exposure percentile for the U. S. population ranging from 164 560% of the aPAD ( see Table 5).

Table 4. Results of Acute Dietary Exposure Analysis for Food Alone Using DEEM FCID 95th Percentile 99th Percentile 99.9th Percentile Population Subgroup aPAD ( mg/ kg/ day) Exposure ( mg/ kg/ day) % aPAD Exposure ( mg/ kg/ day) % aPAD Exposure ( mg/ kg/ day) % aPAD General U. S. Population 0.0034 0.000014 < 1 0.000097 3 0.000506 15 All Infants (< 1 year old) 0.0034 0.000051 1.5 0.000231 7 0.000717 21 Children 1 2 years old 0.0034 0.000109 3 0.000446 13 0.001679 49 Children 3 5 years old 0.0034 0.000069 2 0.000268 8 0.001096 32 Children 6 12 years old 0.0034 0.000031 < 1 0.000139 4 0.000516 15 Youth 13 19 years old 0.0034 0.000005 < 1 0.000060 2 0.000240 7 Adults 20 49 years old 0.0034 0.000007 < 1 0.000060 2 0.000351 10 Adults 50+ years old 0.0034 0.000010 < 1 0.000058 2 0.000275 8 Females 13 49 year old 0.0034 0.000007 < 1 0.000068 2 0.000353 10 Table 5. Triadimefon Results of Acute Dietary Exposure Analysis ( Food + Drinking Water) From a Variety of Gulf Courses Scenarios Using DEEM FCID Triadimefon Dietary Exposure Assessment  RED DP Barcode: 314778 Page 11 of 36 Table 5. Triadimefon Results of Acute Dietary Exposure Analysis ( Food + Drinking Water) From a Variety of Gulf Courses Scenarios Using DEEM FCID Scenario aPAD ( mg/ kg/ day) U. S. Population % aPAD All Infants* % aPAD Children 1 2 yrs* % aPAD Children 3 5 yrs* % aPAD Acute Dietary Estimates 99.9th Percentile 1 Tees and greens 0.0034 32 73 56 43 2 Fairways only 0.0034 164 417 175 176 3 Tees, greens and fairways 0.0034 192 492 206 206 4 Entire golf course 0.0034 560 1433 596 575 * Show only populations having drinking water exposure as significant contributors to triadimefon risk Results of Chronic Dietary Exposure Analysis The chronic dietary exposure analyses results reported in Table 6 are for the general U. S. population, all infants ( less than 1 year old), children 1 2, children 3 5, children 6 12, youth 13 19, adults 20 49, adults 50+ years, and females 13 49.

Food Alone The chronic dietary exposure to triadimefon from food alone is below HED's level of concern (< 100% of the cPAD) for the U. S. population (< 1% of cPAD) and children 1 2 yrs ( 3% of the cPAD). The results of the chronic dietary exposure analysis are reported below in Table 6.

The chronic dietary exposure estimates from food and drinking water using the worst case ( entire golf course) application 1 in 10 year annual concentration are below HED's level of concern (< 100% cPAD) for the U. S. population and all population subgroups. Triadimefon dietary exposure from food and drinking water for the U. S. population is 14% of the cPAD and 46% of the cPAD for all infants (< 1 yr), the most highly exposed population subgroup.

Cancer Dietary Exposure Results and Characterization Triadimefon is classified as Category C " possible human carcinogen." No Q1* has been derived. Triadimefon Dietary Exposure Assessment  RED DP Barcode: 314778 Page 12 of 36 Table 6. Results of Chronic Dietary Exposure Analysis from ( Food Alone) and ( Food + Drinking Water Entire Course) Using DEEM FCID Food Alone Food + Drinking Water ( Entire Course)

Population Subgroup cPAD ( mg/ kg/ day) Exposure ( mg/ kg/ day) % cPAD Exposure ( mg/ kg/ day) % cPAD General U. S. Population 0.0034 0.000017 < 1 0.000480 14 All Infants (< 1 year old) 0.0034 0.000026 < 1 0.001546 46 Children 1 2 years old 0.0034 0.000091 3 0.000780 23 Children 3 5 years old 0.0034 0.000056 2 0.000701 21 Children 6 12 years old 0.0034 0.000021 < 1 0.000466 14 Youth 13 19 years old 0.0034 0.000008 < 1 0.000343 10 Adults 20 49 years old 0.0034 0.000010 < 1 0.000443 13 Adults 50+ years old 0.0034 0.000012 < 1 0.000468 14 Females 13 49 year old 0.0034 0.000011 < 1 0.000442 13 VII. Characterization of Inputs/ Outputs The acute and chronic dietary exposure assessments were refined through the use of experimentally determined processing factors, DEEM 7.81 default processing factors, and percent crop treated estimates provided by BEAD. The anticipated residue estimates are based primarily on USDA PDP monitoring data. However, because monitoring data did not analyze for all triadimefon metabolites of concern, the ratios of total toxic residues ( TTR) to triadimefon and triadimenol from available metabolism studies was used to estimate the total residues of concern. The metabolism study conducted with grapes was used based on the similarities to all the supported crops and the fact that it will produce a more conservative assessment than using the cucumber or tomato metabolism studies. HED concludes that the exposure estimates provided in this document are unlikely to underestimate actual exposure.

VIII. Conclusions Acute and chronic dietary ( food and water) exposure assessments were conducted using the Dietary Exposure Evaluation Model software with the Food Commodity Intake Database ( DEEM FCID   , Version 2.03), which uses food consumption data from the USDA's Continuing Surveys of Food Intakes by Individuals ( CSFII) from 1994 1996 and 1998. The acute and chronic dietary risk assessments were conducted for all supported triadimefon food uses and were performed to support the reregistration eligibility decision document. The anticipated residue ( AR) estimates are based primarily on monitoring data. However, because monitoring data did not analyze for all triadimefon metabolites, KWG 1323 and KWG 1342, the ratio of total toxic Triadimefon Dietary Exposure Assessment  RED DP Barcode: 314778 Page 13 of 36 residues ( TTR) to triadimefon and triadimenol from available metabolism studies was used to estimate the total residues of concern. The sum of triadimefon and triadimenol was multiplied by the ratio 1.25 to account for metabolites, KWG 1323 and KWG 1342. The assessment includes surface water scenarios from Florida turf ( tees/ greens; tees/ greens/ fairways; fairways only; and entire course) scenarios and golf course adjustment factors ( GCAFs) were applied for surface water.

The acute dietary exposure estimates from food alone are below HED's level of concern (< 100 % aPAD) at the 99.9th percentile of exposure. Triadimefon dietary exposure at the 99.9th percentile from food alone is 15% of the aPAD for the U. S. population and 49% of the aPAD for children 1 2 yrs, the most highly exposed population subgroup.

The acute dietary exposure estimates from food and drinking water using the golf tees and greens applications for drinking water are below HED's level of concern (< 100% aPAD) at the 99.9th percentile of exposure. Triadimefon dietary exposure at the 99.9th percentile from food and drinking water is 32% of the aPAD for the U. S. population and 73% of the aPAD for all infants (< 1 yr), the most highly exposed population subgroup ( See Table 7). The acute dietary exposure estimates from food and drinking water using tees/ greens/ fairways, fairways only and entire course for drinking water are above HED's level of concern (> 100% aPAD) at the 99.9th percentile of exposure.

The chronic dietary exposure to triadimefon from food alone is below HED's level of concern (< 100% of the cPAD) for the U. S. population (< 1% of cPAD) and children 1 2 yrs ( 3% of the cPAD). The chronic dietary exposure estimates from triadimefon residues in food and drinking water using the worst case ( entire golf course) application 1 in 10 year annual concentration are below HED's level of concern (< 100% cPAD) for the U. S. population and all population subgroups. Triadimefon dietary exposure from food and drinking water for the U. S. population is 14% of the cPAD and 46% of the cPAD for all infants (< 1 yr), the most highly exposed population subgroup. Triadimefon is classified as Category C " possible human carcinogen." No Q1* has been derived ( see Table 7). Triadimefon Dietary Exposure Assessment  RED DP Barcode: 314778 Page 14 of 36 Table 7. Summary of Dietary Exposure ( Food + Drinking Water Tees and Greens) and Risk Assessment for Tridimefon Acute Dietary ( 99.9th Percentile) Chronic Dietary Cancer Population Subgroup Dietary Exposure ( mg/ kg/ day) % aPAD Dietary Exposure ( mg/ kg/ day) % cPAD Dietary Exposure ( mg/ kg/ day) Risk General U. S. Population 0.001075 32 0.000480 1 All Infants (< 1 year old) 0.002492 73 0.001546 3 Children 1 2 years old 0.001920 56 0.000780 4 Children 3 5 years old 0.001474 43 0.000701 3 Children 6 12 years old 0.000745 22 0.000466 1 Youth 13 19 years old 0.000681 20 0.000343 < 1 Adults 20 49 years old 0.000731 22 0.000443 < 1 Adults 50+ years old 0.000573 17 0.000468 1 Females 13 49 years old 0.000727 21 0.000442 1 N/ A N/ A IX. List of Attachments Attachment 1. Acute Residue Input Data for Food Alone Attachment 2. Acute Residue Analysis for Triadimefon Food Alone Attachment 3. Acute Residue Input Data for Food and Drinking Water ( Tees and greens) Attachment 4. Acute Residue Analysis for Triadimefon Food and Drinking Water ( Tees and greens) Attachment 5. Acute Residue Input Data for Food and Drinking Water ( Fairways only) Attachment 6. Acute Residue Analysis for Triadimefon Food and Drinking Water ( Fairways only) Attachment 7. Acute Residue Input Data for Food and Drinking Water ( Tees, greens and fairways) Attachment 8. Acute Residue Analysis for Triadimefon Food and Drinking Water ( Tees, greens and fairways) Attachment 9. Acute Residue Input Data for Food and Drinking Water ( entire golf course) Attachment 10. Acute Residue Analysis for Triadimefon Food and Drinking Water ( entire golf course) Attachment 11. Chronic Residue Input Data for Food Alone Attachment 12. Chronic Residue Analysis for Triadimefon Food Alone Attachment 13. Chronic Residue Input Data for Food and Drinking Water ( Tees and greens) Triadimefon Dietary Exposure Assessment  RED DP Barcode: 314778 Page 15 of 36 Attachment 14. Chronic Residue Analysis for Triadimefon Food and Drinking Water ( Tees and greens) Attachment 15. Chronic Residue Input Data for Food and Drinking Water ( Fairways only) Attachment 16. Chronic Residue Analysis for Triadimefon Food and Drinking Water ( Fairways only) Attachment 17. Chronic Residue Input Data for Food and Drinking Water ( Tees, greens and fairways) Attachment 18. Chronic Residue Analysis for Triadimefon Food and Drinking Water ( Tees, greens and fairways) Attachment 19. Chronic Residue Input Data for Food and Drinking Water ( entire golf course) Attachment 20. Chronic Residue Analysis for Triadimefon Food and Drinking Water ( entire golf course) Attachment 21. Acute Food Only Critical Exposure Contribution Analysis Attachment 22. Usage Report in Support of Reregistration for Triadimefon.

cc: SPiper, CEB Reading Files; YBarnes, RRB2 Reading Files RDI: DE SAC Reviewer 7/ 5/ 06; A. Nielsen 7/ 6/ 06 7509P: CEB PY Rm 10244: 308 2717: Triadimefon Triadimefon Dietary Exposure Assessment  RED DP Barcode: 314778 Page 16 of 36 Attachment 1. Acute Residue Input Data for Food Alone U. S. Environmental Protection Agency Ver. 2.02 DEEM FCID Acute analysis for TRIADIMEFON Residue file name: C:\ Documents and Settings\ spiper\ SPIPER\ triadimenol\ Triadimefon acute ( 3 applications) 6 27 2006 FOOD ONLY. R98 Analysis Date 06 30 2006 Residue file dated: 06 30 2006/ 09: 04: 55/ 8 Reference dose ( aRfD) = 0.0034 mg/ kg bw/ day Comment: food only  RDL indices and parameters for Monte Carlo Analysis: Index Dist Parameter # 1 Param # 2 Param # 3 Comment # Code       1 6 Apple, NB or PB 6 21 2006. rdf 2 6 Apple, B  6 21 2006. rdf 3 6 GrapesPB 6 21 2006. rdf 4 6 Pear, NB or PB 6 21 2006. rdf 5 6 Pineapples, NB or PB 6 21 2006. rdf 6 6 new FDA Raspberry 06 29 2006. rdf EPA Crop Food Name Def Res Adj. Factors RDL Comment Code Grp ( ppm) # 1 # 2 Pntr         11000070 11 Apple, fruit with peel 0.200000 1.000 1.000 1 11000080 11 Apple, peeled fruit 0.200000 1.000 1.000 1 11000081 11 Apple, peeled fruit babyfood 0.200000 1.000 1.000 1 11000090 11 Apple, dried 0.200000 8.000 1.000 2 11000091 11 Apple, dried babyfood 0.200000 8.000 1.000 2 11000100 11 Apple, juice 0.200000 0.600 1.000 1 11000101 11 Apple, juice babyfood 0.200000 0.600 1.000 1 11000110 11 Apple, sauce 0.200000 1.000 1.000 1 11000111 11 Apple, sauce babyfood 0.200000 1.000 1.000 1 95001750 O Grape 1.000000 1.000 1.000 3 95001760 O Grape, juice 1.000000 1.000 1.000 3 95001761 O Grape, juice babyfood 1.000000 1.000 1.000 3 95001770 O Grape, leaves 1.000000 1.000 1.000 3 95001780 O Grape, raisin 2.500000 4.000 1.000 3 95001790 O Grape, wine and sherry 1.000000 1.000 1.000 3 11002660 11 Pear 0.200000 1.000 1.000 4 11002661 11 Pear babyfood 0.200000 1.000 1.000 4 11002670 11 Pear, dried 0.200000 6.250 1.000 4 11002680 11 Pear, juice 0.200000 1.000 1.000 4 11002681 11 Pear, juice babyfood 0.200000 1.000 1.000 4 95002790 O Pineapple 2.000000 1.000 1.000 5 95002791 O Pineapple babyfood 2.000000 1.000 1.000 5 95002800 O Pineapple, dried 2.000000 5.000 1.000 5 95002810 O Pineapple, juice 2.000000 1.000 1.000 5 95002811 O Pineapple, juice babyfood 2.000000 1.000 1.000 5 13013200 13A Raspberry 2.000000 1.000 1.000 6 13013201 13A Raspberry babyfood 2.000000 1.000 1.000 6 13013210 13A Raspberry, juice 2.000000 1.000 1.000 6 13013211 13A Raspberry, juice babyfood 2.000000 1.000 1.000 6 Triadimefon Dietary Exposure Assessment  RED DP Barcode: 314778 Page 17 of 36 Attachment 2. Acute Residue Analysis for Triadimefon Food Alone U. S. Environmental Protection Agency Ver. 2.02 DEEM FCID ACUTE Analysis for TRIADIMEFON ( 1994 98 data) Residue file: Triadimefon acute ( 3 applications) 6 27 2006 FOOD ONLY. R98 Adjustment factor # 2 used. Analysis Date: 06 30 2006/ 09: 08: 36 Residue file dated: 06 30 2006/ 09: 04: 55/ 8 Daily totals for food and foodform consumption used. MC iterations = 1000 MC list in residue file MC seed = 10 Run Comment: " food only" ===============================================================================

Summary calculations ( per capita):

95th Percentile 99th Percentile 99.9th Percentile Exposure % aRfD Exposure % aRfD Exposure % aRfD       U. S. Population: 0.000014 0.42 0.000097 2.86 0.000506 14.88 All infants: 0.000051 1.51 0.000231 6.80 0.000717 21.09 Children 1 2 yrs: 0.000109 3.19 0.000446 13.10 0.001679 49.38 Children 3 5 yrs: 0.000069 2.02 0.000268 7.88 0.001096 32.22 Children 6 12 yrs: 0.000031 0.91 0.000139 4.09 0.000516 15.19 Youth 13 19 yrs: 0.000005 0.15 0.000060 1.75 0.000240 7.07 Adults 20 49 yrs: 0.000007 0.20 0.000060 1.78 0.000351 10.33 Adults 50+ yrs: 0.000010 0.29 0.000058 1.70 0.000275 8.10 Females 13 49 yrs: 0.000007 0.22 0.000068 2.01 0.000353 10.38 Attachment 3. Acute Residue Input Data for Food and Drinking Water ( Tees and greens)

U. S. Environmental Protection Agency Ver. 2.02 DEEM FCID Acute analysis for TRIADIMEFON Residue file name: C:\ Documents and Settings\ spiper\ SPIPER\ triadimenol\ Triadimefon acute ( 3 applications) tees& greens. R98 Analysis Date 06 30 2006 Residue file dated: 06 30 2006/ 09: 11: 36/ 8 Reference dose ( aRfD) = 0.0034 mg/ kg bw/ day Comment: food + tees and greens only  RDL indices and parameters for Monte Carlo Analysis: Index Dist Parameter # 1 Param # 2 Param # 3 Comment # Code       1 6 Apple, NB or PB 6 21 2006. rdf 2 6 Apple, B  6 21 2006. rdf 3 6 GrapesPB 6 21 2006. rdf 4 6 Pear, NB or PB 6 21 2006. rdf 5 6 Pineapples, NB or PB 6 21 2006. rdf 6 6 new FDA Raspberry 06 29 2006. rdf EPA Crop Food Name Def Res Adj. Factors RDL Comment Code Grp ( ppm) # 1 # 2 Pntr         11000070 11 Apple, fruit with peel 0.200000 1.000 1.000 1 11000080 11 Apple, peeled fruit 0.200000 1.000 1.000 1 11000081 11 Apple, peeled fruit babyfood 0.200000 1.000 1.000 1 11000090 11 Apple, dried 0.200000 8.000 1.000 2 11000091 11 Apple, dried babyfood 0.200000 8.000 1.000 2 11000100 11 Apple, juice 0.200000 0.600 1.000 1 Triadimefon Dietary Exposure Assessment  RED DP Barcode: 314778 Page 18 of 36 11000101 11 Apple, juice babyfood 0.200000 0.600 1.000 1 11000110 11 Apple, sauce 0.200000 1.000 1.000 1 11000111 11 Apple, sauce babyfood 0.200000 1.000 1.000 1 95001750 O Grape 1.000000 1.000 1.000 3 95001760 O Grape, juice 1.000000 1.000 1.000 3 95001761 O Grape, juice babyfood 1.000000 1.000 1.000 3 95001770 O Grape, leaves 1.000000 1.000 1.000 3 95001780 O Grape, raisin 2.500000 4.000 1.000 3 95001790 O Grape, wine and sherry 1.000000 1.000 1.000 3 11002660 11 Pear 0.200000 1.000 1.000 4 11002661 11 Pear babyfood 0.200000 1.000 1.000 4 11002670 11 Pear, dried 0.200000 6.250 1.000 4 11002680 11 Pear, juice 0.200000 1.000 1.000 4 11002681 11 Pear, juice babyfood 0.200000 1.000 1.000 4 95002790 O Pineapple 2.000000 1.000 1.000 5 95002791 O Pineapple babyfood 2.000000 1.000 1.000 5 95002800 O Pineapple, dried 2.000000 5.000 1.000 5 95002810 O Pineapple, juice 2.000000 1.000 1.000 5 95002811 O Pineapple, juice babyfood 2.000000 1.000 1.000 5 13013200 13A Raspberry 2.000000 1.000 1.000 6 13013201 13A Raspberry babyfood 2.000000 1.000 1.000 6 13013210 13A Raspberry, juice 2.000000 1.000 1.000 6 13013211 13A Raspberry, juice babyfood 2.000000 1.000 1.000 6 86010000 O Water, direct, all sources 0.004900 1.000 1.000 86020000 O Water, indirect, all sources 0.004900 1.000 1.000 Attachment 4. Acute Residue Analysis for Triadimefon Food and Drinking Water ( Tees and greens)

U. S. Environmental Protection Agency Ver. 2.02 DEEM FCID ACUTE Analysis for TRIADIMEFON ( 1994 98 data) Residue file: Triadimefon acute ( 3 applications) tees& greens. R98 Adjustment factor # 2 used. Analysis Date: 06 30 2006/ 09: 17: 11 Residue file dated: 06 30 2006/ 09: 11: 36/ 8 Daily totals for food and foodform consumption used. MC iterations = 1000 MC list in residue file MC seed = 10 Run Comment: " food + tees and greens only" ===============================================================================

Summary calculations ( per capita):

95th Percentile 99th Percentile 99.9th Percentile Exposure % aRfD Exposure % aRfD Exposure % aRfD       U. S. Population: 0.000270 7.93 0.000508 14.93 0.001075 31.61 All infants: 0.000970 28.54 0.001411 41.49 0.002492 73.29 Children 1 2 yrs: 0.000476 13.99 0.000809 23.78 0.001920 56.46 Children 3 5 yrs: 0.000407 11.98 0.000633 18.61 0.001474 43.34 Children 6 12 yrs: 0.000271 7.98 0.000457 13.43 0.000745 21.92 Youth 13 19 yrs: 0.000215 6.32 0.000357 10.51 0.000681 20.02 Adults 20 49 yrs: 0.000245 7.20 0.000410 12.05 0.000731 21.50 Adults 50+ yrs: 0.000221 6.50 0.000322 9.46 0.000573 16.86 Females 13 49 yrs: 0.000246 7.23 0.000407 11.97 0.000727 21.37 Triadimefon Dietary Exposure Assessment  RED DP Barcode: 314778 Page 19 of 36 Attachment 5. Acute Residue Input Data for Food and Drinking Water ( Fairways only)

U. S. Environmental Protection Agency Ver. 2.02 DEEM FCID Acute analysis for TRIADIMEFON Residue file name: C:\ Documents and Settings\ spiper\ SPIPER\ triadimenol\ Triadimefon acute ( 3 applications) fairways. R98 Analysis Date 06 30 2006 Residue file dated: 06 30 2006/ 09: 42: 23/ 8 Reference dose ( aRfD) = 0.0034 mg/ kg bw/ day Comment: food + fairways  RDL indices and parameters for Monte Carlo Analysis: Index Dist Parameter # 1 Param # 2 Param # 3 Comment # Code       1 6 Apple, NB or PB 6 21 2006. rdf 2 6 Apple, B  6 21 2006. rdf 3 6 GrapesPB 6 21 2006. rdf 4 6 Pear, NB or PB 6 21 2006. rdf 5 6 Pineapples, NB or PB 6 21 2006. rdf 6 6 new FDA Raspberry 06 29 2006. rdf EPA Crop Food Name Def Res Adj. Factors RDL Comment Code Grp ( ppm) # 1 # 2 Pntr         11000070 11 Apple, fruit with peel 0.200000 1.000 1.000 1 11000080 11 Apple, peeled fruit 0.200000 1.000 1.000 1 11000081 11 Apple, peeled fruit babyfood 0.200000 1.000 1.000 1 11000090 11 Apple, dried 0.200000 8.000 1.000 2 11000091 11 Apple, dried babyfood 0.200000 8.000 1.000 2 11000100 11 Apple, juice 0.200000 0.600 1.000 1 11000101 11 Apple, juice babyfood 0.200000 0.600 1.000 1 11000110 11 Apple, sauce 0.200000 1.000 1.000 1 11000111 11 Apple, sauce babyfood 0.200000 1.000 1.000 1 95001750 O Grape 1.000000 1.000 1.000 3 95001760 O Grape, juice 1.000000 1.000 1.000 3 95001761 O Grape, juice babyfood 1.000000 1.000 1.000 3 95001770 O Grape, leaves 1.000000 1.000 1.000 3 95001780 O Grape, raisin 2.500000 4.000 1.000 3 95001790 O Grape, wine and sherry 1.000000 1.000 1.000 3 11002660 11 Pear 0.200000 1.000 1.000 4 11002661 11 Pear babyfood 0.200000 1.000 1.000 4 11002670 11 Pear, dried 0.200000 6.250 1.000 4 11002680 11 Pear, juice 0.200000 1.000 1.000 4 11002681 11 Pear, juice babyfood 0.200000 1.000 1.000 4 95002790 O Pineapple 2.000000 1.000 1.000 5 95002791 O Pineapple babyfood 2.000000 1.000 1.000 5 95002800 O Pineapple, dried 2.000000 5.000 1.000 5 95002810 O Pineapple, juice 2.000000 1.000 1.000 5 95002811 O Pineapple, juice babyfood 2.000000 1.000 1.000 5 13013200 13A Raspberry 2.000000 1.000 1.000 6 13013201 13A Raspberry babyfood 2.000000 1.000 1.000 6 13013210 13A Raspberry, juice 2.000000 1.000 1.000 6 13013211 13A Raspberry, juice babyfood 2.000000 1.000 1.000 6 86010000 O Water, direct, all sources 0.028000 1.000 1.000 86020000 O Water, indirect, all sources 0.028000 1.000 1.000 Attachment 6. Acute Residue Analysis for Triadimefon Food and Drinking Water ( Fairways only)

U. S. Environmental Protection Agency Ver. 2.02 DEEM FCID ACUTE Analysis for TRIADIMEFON ( 1994 98 data) Residue file: Triadimefon acute ( 3 applications) fairways. R98 Adjustment factor # 2 used. Analysis Date: 06 30 2006/ 09: 46: 38 Residue file dated: 06 30 2006/ 09: 42: 23/ 8 Daily totals for food and foodform consumption used. MC iterations = 1000 MC list in residue file MC seed = 10 Run Comment: " food + fairways" =============================================================================== Triadimefon Dietary Exposure Assessment  RED DP Barcode: 314778 Page 20 of 36 Summary calculations ( per capita):

95th Percentile 99th Percentile 99.9th Percentile Exposure % aRfD Exposure % aRfD Exposure % aRfD       U. S. Population: 0.001470 43.24 0.002772 81.52 0.005567 163.73 All infants: 0.005516 162.23 0.007910 232.64 0.014164 416.60 Children 1 2 yrs: 0.002341 68.86 0.003934 115.70 0.005934 174.54 Children 3 5 yrs: 0.002120 62.36 0.003317 97.57 0.005979 175.85 Children 6 12 yrs: 0.001467 43.15 0.002448 72.00 0.003355 98.66 Youth 13 19 yrs: 0.001192 35.06 0.002015 59.25 0.003582 105.34 Adults 20 49 yrs: 0.001360 40.01 0.002277 66.97 0.004121 121.22 Adults 50+ yrs: 0.001231 36.22 0.001764 51.87 0.002853 83.90 Females 13 49 yrs: 0.001365 40.15 0.002195 64.56 0.003903 114.79 Attachment 7. Acute Residue Input Data for Food and Drinking Water ( Tees, greens and fairways)

U. S. Environmental Protection Agency Ver. 2.02 DEEM FCID Acute analysis for TRIADIMEFON Residue file name: C:\ Documents and Settings\ spiper\ SPIPER\ triadimenol\ Triadimefon acute ( 3 applications) tees& green& fairways. R98 Analysis Date 06 30 2006 Residue file dated: 06 30 2006/ 09: 32: 44/ 8 Reference dose ( aRfD) = 0.0034 mg/ kg bw/ day Comment: food + tees + greens + fairways  RDL indices and parameters for Monte Carlo Analysis: Index Dist Parameter # 1 Param # 2 Param # 3 Comment # Code       1 6 Apple, NB or PB 6 21 2006. rdf 2 6 Apple, B  6 21 2006. rdf 3 6 GrapesPB 6 21 2006. rdf 4 6 Pear, NB or PB 6 21 2006. rdf 5 6 Pineapples, NB or PB 6 21 2006. rdf 6 6 new FDA Raspberry 06 29 2006. rdf EPA Crop Food Name Def Res Adj. Factors RDL Comment Code Grp ( ppm) # 1 # 2 Pntr         11000070 11 Apple, fruit with peel 0.200000 1.000 1.000 1 11000080 11 Apple, peeled fruit 0.200000 1.000 1.000 1 11000081 11 Apple, peeled fruit babyfood 0.200000 1.000 1.000 1 11000090 11 Apple, dried 0.200000 8.000 1.000 2 11000091 11 Apple, dried babyfood 0.200000 8.000 1.000 2 11000100 11 Apple, juice 0.200000 0.600 1.000 1 11000101 11 Apple, juice babyfood 0.200000 0.600 1.000 1 11000110 11 Apple, sauce 0.200000 1.000 1.000 1 11000111 11 Apple, sauce babyfood 0.200000 1.000 1.000 1 95001750 O Grape 1.000000 1.000 1.000 3 95001760 O Grape, juice 1.000000 1.000 1.000 3 95001761 O Grape, juice babyfood 1.000000 1.000 1.000 3 95001770 O Grape, leaves 1.000000 1.000 1.000 3 95001780 O Grape, raisin 2.500000 4.000 1.000 3 95001790 O Grape, wine and sherry 1.000000 1.000 1.000 3 11002660 11 Pear 0.200000 1.000 1.000 4 11002661 11 Pear babyfood 0.200000 1.000 1.000 4 11002670 11 Pear, dried 0.200000 6.250 1.000 4 Triadimefon Dietary Exposure Assessment  RED DP Barcode: 314778 Page 21 of 36 11002680 11 Pear, juice 0.200000 1.000 1.000 4 11002681 11 Pear, juice babyfood 0.200000 1.000 1.000 4 95002790 O Pineapple 2.000000 1.000 1.000 5 95002791 O Pineapple babyfood 2.000000 1.000 1.000 5 95002800 O Pineapple, dried 2.000000 5.000 1.000 5 95002810 O Pineapple, juice 2.000000 1.000 1.000 5 95002811 O Pineapple, juice babyfood 2.000000 1.000 1.000 5 13013200 13A Raspberry 2.000000 1.000 1.000 6 13013201 13A Raspberry babyfood 2.000000 1.000 1.000 6 13013210 13A Raspberry, juice 2.000000 1.000 1.000 6 13013211 13A Raspberry, juice babyfood 2.000000 1.000 1.000 6 86010000 O Water, direct, all sources 0.033000 1.000 1.000 86020000 O Water, indirect, all sources 0.033000 1.000 1.000 Attachment 8. Acute Residue Analysis for Triadimefon Food and Drinking Water ( Tees, greens and fairways)

U. S. Environmental Protection Agency Ver. 2.02 DEEM FCID ACUTE Analysis for TRIADIMEFON ( 1994 98 data) Residue file: Triadimefon acute ( 3 applications) tees& green& fairways. R98 Adjustment factor # 2 used. Analysis Date: 06 30 2006/ 09: 36: 56 Residue file dated: 06 30 2006/ 09: 32: 44/ 8 Daily totals for food and foodform consumption used. MC iterations = 1000 MC list in residue file MC seed = 10 Run Comment: " food + tees + greens + fairways" ===============================================================================

Summary calculations ( per capita):

95th Percentile 99th Percentile 99.9th Percentile Exposure % aRfD Exposure % aRfD Exposure % aRfD       U. S. Population: 0.001731 50.91 0.003261 95.91 0.006519 191.73 All infants: 0.006490 190.89 0.009289 273.20 0.016731 492.09 Children 1 2 yrs: 0.002749 80.84 0.004646 136.65 0.007002 205.95 Children 3 5 yrs: 0.002490 73.22 0.003902 114.77 0.006997 205.80 Children 6 12 yrs: 0.001729 50.84 0.002887 84.91 0.003929 115.57 Youth 13 19 yrs: 0.001407 41.38 0.002356 69.29 0.004230 124.40 Adults 20 49 yrs: 0.001601 47.10 0.002678 78.75 0.004867 143.15 Adults 50+ yrs: 0.001449 42.61 0.002078 61.11 0.003365 98.98 Females 13 49 yrs: 0.001610 47.36 0.002590 76.17 0.004578 134.66 Attachment 9. Acute Residue Input Data for Food and Drinking Water ( entire golf course)

U. S. Environmental Protection Agency Ver. 2.02 DEEM FCID Acute analysis for TRIADIMEFON Residue file name: C:\ Documents and Settings\ spiper\ SPIPER\ triadimenol\ Triadimefon acute ( 3 applications) entiregolf. R98 Analysis Date 06 30 2006 Residue file dated: 06 30 2006/ 11: 12: 20/ 8 Reference dose ( aRfD) = 0.0034 mg/ kg bw/ day Comment: food + entire golf course  RDL indices and parameters for Monte Carlo Analysis: Index Dist Parameter # 1 Param # 2 Param # 3 Comment # Code       Triadimefon Dietary Exposure Assessment  RED DP Barcode: 314778 Page 22 of 36 1 6 Apple, NB or PB 6 21 2006. rdf 2 6 Apple, B  6 21 2006. rdf 3 6 GrapesPB 6 21 2006. rdf 4 6 Pear, NB or PB 6 21 2006. rdf 5 6 Pineapples, NB or PB 6 21 2006. rdf 6 6 new FDA Raspberry 06 29 2006. rdf EPA Crop Food Name Def Res Adj. Factors RDL Comment Code Grp ( ppm) # 1 # 2 Pntr         11000070 11 Apple, fruit with peel 0.200000 1.000 1.000 1 11000080 11 Apple, peeled fruit 0.200000 1.000 1.000 1 11000081 11 Apple, peeled fruit babyfood 0.200000 1.000 1.000 1 11000090 11 Apple, dried 0.200000 8.000 1.000 2 11000091 11 Apple, dried babyfood 0.200000 8.000 1.000 2 11000100 11 Apple, juice 0.200000 0.600 1.000 1 11000101 11 Apple, juice babyfood 0.200000 0.600 1.000 1 11000110 11 Apple, sauce 0.200000 1.000 1.000 1 11000111 11 Apple, sauce babyfood 0.200000 1.000 1.000 1 95001750 O Grape 1.000000 1.000 1.000 3 95001760 O Grape, juice 1.000000 1.000 1.000 3 95001761 O Grape, juice babyfood 1.000000 1.000 1.000 3 95001770 O Grape, leaves 1.000000 1.000 1.000 3 95001780 O Grape, raisin 2.500000 4.000 1.000 3 95001790 O Grape, wine and sherry 1.000000 1.000 1.000 3 11002660 11 Pear 0.200000 1.000 1.000 4 11002661 11 Pear babyfood 0.200000 1.000 1.000 4 11002670 11 Pear, dried 0.200000 6.250 1.000 4 11002680 11 Pear, juice 0.200000 1.000 1.000 4 11002681 11 Pear, juice babyfood 0.200000 1.000 1.000 4 95002790 O Pineapple 2.000000 1.000 1.000 5 95002791 O Pineapple babyfood 2.000000 1.000 1.000 5 95002800 O Pineapple, dried 2.000000 5.000 1.000 5 95002810 O Pineapple, juice 2.000000 1.000 1.000 5 95002811 O Pineapple, juice babyfood 2.000000 1.000 1.000 5 13013200 13A Raspberry 2.000000 1.000 1.000 6 13013201 13A Raspberry babyfood 2.000000 1.000 1.000 6 13013210 13A Raspberry, juice 2.000000 1.000 1.000 6 13013211 13A Raspberry, juice babyfood 2.000000 1.000 1.000 6 86010000 O Water, direct, all sources 0.097000 1.000 1.000 86020000 O Water, indirect, all sources 0.097000 1.000 1.000 Attachment 10. Acute Residue Analysis for Triadimefon Food and Drinking Water ( entire golf course)

U. S. Environmental Protection Agency Ver. 2.02 DEEM FCID ACUTE Analysis for TRIADIMEFON ( 1994 98 data) Residue file: Triadimefon acute ( 3 applications) entiregolf. R98 Adjustment factor # 2 used. Analysis Date: 06 30 2006/ 11: 16: 33 Residue file dated: 06 30 2006/ 11: 12: 20/ 8 Daily totals for food and foodform consumption used. MC iterations = 1000 MC list in residue file MC seed = 10 Run Comment: " food + entire golf course" ===============================================================================

Summary calculations ( per capita):

95th Percentile 99th Percentile 99.9th Percentile Exposure % aRfD Exposure % aRfD Exposure % aRfD       U. S. Population: 0.005076 149.31 0.009543 280.69 0.019034 559.81 All infants: 0.018995 558.67 0.027288 802.59 0.048734 1433.35 Children 1 2 yrs: 0.007967 234.31 0.013323 391.86 0.020277 596.37 Children 3 5 yrs: 0.007284 214.23 0.011382 334.77 0.019559 575.26 Triadimefon Dietary Exposure Assessment  RED DP Barcode: 314778 Page 23 of 36 Children 6 12 yrs: 0.005055 148.67 0.008427 247.84 0.011501 338.27 Youth 13 19 yrs: 0.004121 121.20 0.006928 203.76 0.012456 366.36 Adults 20 49 yrs: 0.004700 138.24 0.007874 231.59 0.014162 416.54 Adults 50+ yrs: 0.004244 124.83 0.006066 178.41 0.009861 290.03 Females 13 49 yrs: 0.004723 138.92 0.007569 222.62 0.013442 395.35 Triadimefon Dietary Exposure Assessment  RED DP Barcode: 314778 Page 24 of 36 Attachment 11. Chronic Residue Input Data for Food Alone U. S. Environmental Protection Agency Ver. 2.00 DEEM FCID Chronic analysis for TRIADIMEFON 1994 98 data Residue file: C:\ Documents and Settings\ spiper\ SPIPER\ triadimenol\ Triadimefon chronic ( 3 applications). R98 Adjust. # 2 used Analysis Date 07 03 2006 Residue file dated: 07 03 2006/ 08: 14: 24/ 8 Reference dose ( RfD) = 0.0034 mg/ kg bw/ day Comment: Food only  Food Crop Residue Adj. Factors Comment EPA Code Grp Food Name ( ppm) # 1 # 2        11000070 11 Apple, fruit with peel 0.000140 1.000 1.000 11000080 11 Apple, peeled fruit 0.000140 1.000 1.000 11000081 11 Apple, peeled fruit babyfood 0.000140 1.000 1.000 11000090 11 Apple, dried 0.001300 8.000 1.000 11000091 11 Apple, dried babyfood 0.001300 8.000 1.000 11000100 11 Apple, juice 0.000140 0.600 1.000 11000101 11 Apple, juice babyfood 0.000140 0.600 1.000 11000110 11 Apple, sauce 0.000140 1.000 1.000 11000111 11 Apple, sauce babyfood 0.000140 1.000 1.000 95001750 O Grape 0.027000 1.000 1.000 95001760 O Grape, juice 0.027000 1.000 1.000 95001761 O Grape, juice babyfood 0.027000 1.000 1.000 95001770 O Grape, leaves 0.027000 1.000 1.000 95001780 O Grape, raisin 0.027000 4.000 1.000 95001790 O Grape, wine and sherry 0.027000 1.000 1.000 11002660 11 Pear 0.001000 1.000 1.000 11002661 11 Pear babyfood 0.001000 1.000 1.000 11002670 11 Pear, dried 0.001000 6.250 1.000 11002680 11 Pear, juice 0.001000 1.000 1.000 11002681 11 Pear, juice babyfood 0.001000 1.000 1.000 95002790 O Pineapple 0.001000 1.000 1.000 95002791 O Pineapple babyfood 0.001000 1.000 1.000 95002800 O Pineapple, dried 0.001000 5.000 1.000 95002810 O Pineapple, juice 0.001000 1.000 1.000 95002811 O Pineapple, juice babyfood 0.001000 1.000 1.000 13013200 13A Raspberry 0.024000 1.000 1.000 13013201 13A Raspberry babyfood 0.024000 1.000 1.000 13013210 13A Raspberry, juice 0.024000 1.000 1.000 13013211 13A Raspberry, juice babyfood 0.024000 1.000 1.000 Triadimefon Dietary Exposure Assessment  RED DP Barcode: 314778 Page 25 of 36 Attachment 12. Chronic Residue Analyis for Triadimefon Food Alone U. S. Environmental Protection Agency Ver. 2.00 DEEM FCID Chronic analysis for TRIADIMEFON ( 1994 98 data) Residue file name: C:\ Documents and Settings\ spiper\ SPIPER\ triadimenol\ Triadimefon chronic ( 3 applications). R98 Adjustment factor # 2 used. Analysis Date 07 03 2006/ 08: 14: 42 Residue file dated: 07 03 2006/ 08: 14: 24/ 8 Reference dose ( RfD, Chronic) = .0034 mg/ kg bw/ day COMMENT 1: Food only =============================================================================== Total exposure by population subgroup

Total Exposure  Population mg/ kg Percent of Subgroup body wt/ day Rfd    U. S. Population ( total) 0.000017 0.5%

U. S. Population ( spring season) 0.000016 0.5% U. S. Population ( summer season) 0.000018 0.5% U. S. Population ( autumn season) 0.000016 0.5% U. S. Population ( winter season) 0.000017 0.5%

Northeast region 0.000020 0.6% Midwest region 0.000016 0.5% Southern region 0.000014 0.4% Western region 0.000018 0.5%

Hispanics 0.000013 0.4% Non hispanic whites 0.000018 0.5% Non hispanic blacks 0.000014 0.4% Non hisp/ non white/ non black 0.000012 0.3%

All infants (< 1 year) 0.000026 0.8% Nursing infants 0.000010 0.3% Non nursing infants 0.000032 0.9% Children 1 6 yrs 0.000063 1.9% Children 7 12 yrs 0.000020 0.6%

Females 13 19 ( not preg or nursing) 0.000009 0.3% Females 20+ ( not preg or nursing) 0.000012 0.4% Females 13 50 yrs 0.000011 0.3% Females 13+ ( preg/ not nursing) 0.000007 0.2% Females 13+ ( nursing) 0.000011 0.3%

Males 13 19 yrs 0.000007 0.2% Males 20+ yrs 0.000010 0.3% Seniors 55+ 0.000013 0.4%

Children 1 2 yrs 0.000091 2.7% Children 3 5 yrs 0.000056 1.6% Children 6 12 yrs 0.000021 0.6% Youth 13 19 yrs 0.000008 0.2% Adults 20 49 yrs 0.000010 0.3% Adults 50+ yrs 0.000012 0.4% Females 13 49 yrs 0.000011 0.3%

 Triadimefon Dietary Exposure Assessment  RED DP Barcode: 314778 Page 26 of 36 Attachment 13. Chronic Residue Input Data for Food and Drinking Water ( Tees and greens)

U. S. Environmental Protection Agency Ver. 2.00 DEEM FCID Chronic analysis for TRIADIMEFON 1994 98 data Residue file: C:\ Documents and Settings\ spiper\ SPIPER\ triadimenol\ Triadimefon chronic ( 3 applications) teesgreens. R98 Adjust. # 2 used Analysis Date 07 03 2006 Residue file dated: 07 03 2006/ 08: 18: 56/ 8 Reference dose ( RfD) = 0.0034 mg/ kg bw/ day Comment: Food only + Tees and greens  Food Crop Residue Adj. Factors Comment EPA Code Grp Food Name ( ppm) # 1 # 2        11000070 11 Apple, fruit with peel 0.000140 1.000 1.000 11000080 11 Apple, peeled fruit 0.000140 1.000 1.000 11000081 11 Apple, peeled fruit babyfood 0.000140 1.000 1.000 11000090 11 Apple, dried 0.001300 8.000 1.000 11000091 11 Apple, dried babyfood 0.001300 8.000 1.000 11000100 11 Apple, juice 0.000140 0.600 1.000 11000101 11 Apple, juice babyfood 0.000140 0.600 1.000 11000110 11 Apple, sauce 0.000140 1.000 1.000 11000111 11 Apple, sauce babyfood 0.000140 1.000 1.000 95001750 O Grape 0.027000 1.000 1.000 95001760 O Grape, juice 0.027000 1.000 1.000 95001761 O Grape, juice babyfood 0.027000 1.000 1.000 95001770 O Grape, leaves 0.027000 1.000 1.000 95001780 O Grape, raisin 0.027000 4.000 1.000 95001790 O Grape, wine and sherry 0.027000 1.000 1.000 11002660 11 Pear 0.001000 1.000 1.000 11002661 11 Pear babyfood 0.001000 1.000 1.000 11002670 11 Pear, dried 0.001000 6.250 1.000 11002680 11 Pear, juice 0.001000 1.000 1.000 11002681 11 Pear, juice babyfood 0.001000 1.000 1.000 95002790 O Pineapple 0.001000 1.000 1.000 95002791 O Pineapple babyfood 0.001000 1.000 1.000 95002800 O Pineapple, dried 0.001000 5.000 1.000 95002810 O Pineapple, juice 0.001000 1.000 1.000 95002811 O Pineapple, juice babyfood 0.001000 1.000 1.000 13013200 13A Raspberry 0.024000 1.000 1.000 13013201 13A Raspberry babyfood 0.024000 1.000 1.000 13013210 13A Raspberry, juice 0.024000 1.000 1.000 13013211 13A Raspberry, juice babyfood 0.024000 1.000 1.000 86010000 O Water, direct, all sources 0.001100 1.000 1.000 86020000 O Water, indirect, all sources 0.001100 1.000 1.000 Attachment 14. Chronic Residue Analysis for Triadimefon Food and Drinking Water ( Tees and greens)

U. S. Environmental Protection Agency Ver. 2.00 DEEM FCID Chronic analysis for TRIADIMEFON ( 1994 98 data) Residue file name: C:\ Documents and Settings\ spiper\ SPIPER\ triadimenol\ Triadimefon chronic ( 3 applications) teesgreens. R98 Adjustment factor # 2 used. Analysis Date 07 03 2006/ 08: 19: 16 Residue file dated: 07 03 2006/ 08: 18: 56/ 8 Reference dose ( RfD, Chronic) = .0034 mg/ kg bw/ day COMMENT 1: Food only + Tees and greens =============================================================================== Total exposure by population subgroup

Total Exposure  Population mg/ kg Percent of Subgroup body wt/ day Rfd Triadimefon Dietary Exposure Assessment  RED DP Barcode: 314778 Page 27 of 36    U. S. Population ( total) 0.000040 1.2%

U. S. Population ( spring season) 0.000039 1.1% U. S. Population ( summer season) 0.000043 1.3% U. S. Population ( autumn season) 0.000038 1.1% U. S. Population ( winter season) 0.000039 1.2%

Northeast region 0.000041 1.2% Midwest region 0.000040 1.2% Southern region 0.000036 1.1% Western region 0.000045 1.3%

Hispanics 0.000039 1.2% Non hispanic whites 0.000041 1.2% Non hispanic blacks 0.000036 1.1% Non hisp/ non white/ non black 0.000040 1.2%

All infants (< 1 year) 0.000102 3.0% Nursing infants 0.000039 1.1% Non nursing infants 0.000126 3.7% Children 1 6 yrs 0.000095 2.8% Children 7 12 yrs 0.000041 1.2%

Females 13 19 ( not preg or nursing) 0.000025 0.7% Females 20+ ( not preg or nursing) 0.000035 1.0% Females 13 50 yrs 0.000034 1.0% Females 13+ ( preg/ not nursing) 0.000030 0.9% Females 13+ ( nursing) 0.000043 1.3%

Males 13 19 yrs 0.000024 0.7% Males 20+ yrs 0.000031 0.9% Seniors 55+ 0.000035 1.0%

Children 1 2 yrs 0.000125 3.7% Children 3 5 yrs 0.000088 2.6% Children 6 12 yrs 0.000044 1.3% Youth 13 19 yrs 0.000025 0.7% Adults 20 49 yrs 0.000032 0.9% Adults 50+ yrs 0.000035 1.0% Females 13 49 yrs 0.000033 1.0%

Attachment 15. Chronic Residue Input Data for Food and Drinking Water ( Fairways only)

U. S. Environmental Protection Agency Ver. 2.00 DEEM FCID Chronic analysis for TRIADIMEFON 1994 98 data Residue file: C:\ Documents and Settings\ spiper\ SPIPER\ triadimenol\ Triadimefon chronic ( 3 applications) fairways. R98 Adjust. # 2 used Analysis Date 07 03 2006 Residue file dated: 07 03 2006/ 08: 21: 33/ 8 Reference dose ( RfD) = 0.0034 mg/ kg bw/ day Comment: Food only + fairways  Food Crop Residue Adj. Factors Comment EPA Code Grp Food Name ( ppm) # 1 # 2        11000070 11 Apple, fruit with peel 0.000140 1.000 1.000 11000080 11 Apple, peeled fruit 0.000140 1.000 1.000 11000081 11 Apple, peeled fruit babyfood 0.000140 1.000 1.000 11000090 11 Apple, dried 0.001300 8.000 1.000 11000091 11 Apple, dried babyfood 0.001300 8.000 1.000 11000100 11 Apple, juice 0.000140 0.600 1.000 11000101 11 Apple, juice babyfood 0.000140 0.600 1.000 11000110 11 Apple, sauce 0.000140 1.000 1.000 11000111 11 Apple, sauce babyfood 0.000140 1.000 1.000 95001750 O Grape 0.027000 1.000 1.000 95001760 O Grape, juice 0.027000 1.000 1.000 95001761 O Grape, juice babyfood 0.027000 1.000 1.000 Triadimefon Dietary Exposure Assessment  RED DP Barcode: 314778 Page 28 of 36 95001770 O Grape, leaves 0.027000 1.000 1.000 95001780 O Grape, raisin 0.027000 4.000 1.000 95001790 O Grape, wine and sherry 0.027000 1.000 1.000 11002660 11 Pear 0.001000 1.000 1.000 11002661 11 Pear babyfood 0.001000 1.000 1.000 11002670 11 Pear, dried 0.001000 6.250 1.000 11002680 11 Pear, juice 0.001000 1.000 1.000 11002681 11 Pear, juice babyfood 0.001000 1.000 1.000 95002790 O Pineapple 0.001000 1.000 1.000 95002791 O Pineapple babyfood 0.001000 1.000 1.000 95002800 O Pineapple, dried 0.001000 5.000 1.000 95002810 O Pineapple, juice 0.001000 1.000 1.000 95002811 O Pineapple, juice babyfood 0.001000 1.000 1.000 13013200 13A Raspberry 0.024000 1.000 1.000 13013201 13A Raspberry babyfood 0.024000 1.000 1.000 13013210 13A Raspberry, juice 0.024000 1.000 1.000 13013211 13A Raspberry, juice babyfood 0.024000 1.000 1.000 86010000 O Water, direct, all sources 0.006400 1.000 1.000 86020000 O Water, indirect, all sources 0.006400 1.000 1.000 Attachment 16. Chronic Residue Analysis for Triadimefon Food and Drinking Water ( Fairways only)

U. S. Environmental Protection Agency Ver. 2.00 DEEM FCID Chronic analysis for TRIADIMEFON ( 1994 98 data) Residue file name: C:\ Documents and Settings\ spiper\ SPIPER\ triadimenol\ Triadimefon chronic ( 3 applications) fairways. R98 Adjustment factor # 2 used. Analysis Date 07 03 2006/ 08: 21: 48 Residue file dated: 07 03 2006/ 08: 21: 33/ 8 Reference dose ( RfD, Chronic) = .0034 mg/ kg bw/ day COMMENT 1: Food only + fairways =============================================================================== Total exposure by population subgroup

Total Exposure  Population mg/ kg Percent of Subgroup body wt/ day Rfd    U. S. Population ( total) 0.000152 4.5%

U. S. Population ( spring season) 0.000150 4.4% U. S. Population ( summer season) 0.000163 4.8% U. S. Population ( autumn season) 0.000146 4.3% U. S. Population ( winter season) 0.000147 4.3%

Northeast region 0.000143 4.2% Midwest region 0.000153 4.5% Southern region 0.000142 4.2% Western region 0.000173 5.1%

Hispanics 0.000166 4.9% Non hispanic whites 0.000150 4.4% Non hispanic blacks 0.000142 4.2% Non hisp/ non white/ non black 0.000177 5.2%

All infants (< 1 year) 0.000468 13.8% Nursing infants 0.000174 5.1% Non nursing infants 0.000580 17.1% Children 1 6 yrs 0.000251 7.4% Children 7 12 yrs 0.000143 4.2%

Females 13 19 ( not preg or nursing) 0.000104 3.1% Females 20+ ( not preg or nursing) 0.000147 4.3% Females 13 50 yrs 0.000142 4.2% Females 13+ ( preg/ not nursing) 0.000138 4.1% Females 13+ ( nursing) 0.000197 5.8% Triadimefon Dietary Exposure Assessment  RED DP Barcode: 314778 Page 29 of 36 Males 13 19 yrs 0.000106 3.1% Males 20+ yrs 0.000131 3.8% Seniors 55+ 0.000145 4.3%

Children 1 2 yrs 0.000291 8.6% Children 3 5 yrs 0.000243 7.2% Children 6 12 yrs 0.000151 4.4% Youth 13 19 yrs 0.000105 3.1% Adults 20 49 yrs 0.000136 4.0% Adults 50+ yrs 0.000145 4.3% Females 13 49 yrs 0.000136 4.0%

Attachment 17. Chronic Residue Input Data for Food and Drinking Water ( Tees, greens and fairways)

U. S. Environmental Protection Agency Ver. 2.00 DEEM FCID Chronic analysis for TRIADIMEFON 1994 98 data Residue file: C:\ Documents and Settings\ spiper\ SPIPER\ triadimenol\ Triadimefon chronic ( 3 applications) tgf. R98 Adjust. # 2 used Analysis Date 07 03 2006 Residue file dated: 07 03 2006/ 08: 24: 57/ 8 Reference dose ( RfD) = 0.0034 mg/ kg bw/ day Comment: Food only + Tees and greens and fairways  Food Crop Residue Adj. Factors Comment EPA Code Grp Food Name ( ppm) # 1 # 2        11000070 11 Apple, fruit with peel 0.000140 1.000 1.000 11000080 11 Apple, peeled fruit 0.000140 1.000 1.000 11000081 11 Apple, peeled fruit babyfood 0.000140 1.000 1.000 11000090 11 Apple, dried 0.001300 8.000 1.000 11000091 11 Apple, dried babyfood 0.001300 8.000 1.000 11000100 11 Apple, juice 0.000140 0.600 1.000 11000101 11 Apple, juice babyfood 0.000140 0.600 1.000 11000110 11 Apple, sauce 0.000140 1.000 1.000 11000111 11 Apple, sauce babyfood 0.000140 1.000 1.000 95001750 O Grape 0.027000 1.000 1.000 95001760 O Grape, juice 0.027000 1.000 1.000 95001761 O Grape, juice babyfood 0.027000 1.000 1.000 95001770 O Grape, leaves 0.027000 1.000 1.000 95001780 O Grape, raisin 0.027000 4.000 1.000 95001790 O Grape, wine and sherry 0.027000 1.000 1.000 11002660 11 Pear 0.001000 1.000 1.000 11002661 11 Pear babyfood 0.001000 1.000 1.000 11002670 11 Pear, dried 0.001000 6.250 1.000 11002680 11 Pear, juice 0.001000 1.000 1.000 11002681 11 Pear, juice babyfood 0.001000 1.000 1.000 95002790 O Pineapple 0.001000 1.000 1.000 95002791 O Pineapple babyfood 0.001000 1.000 1.000 95002800 O Pineapple, dried 0.001000 5.000 1.000 95002810 O Pineapple, juice 0.001000 1.000 1.000 95002811 O Pineapple, juice babyfood 0.001000 1.000 1.000 13013200 13A Raspberry 0.024000 1.000 1.000 13013201 13A Raspberry babyfood 0.024000 1.000 1.000 13013210 13A Raspberry, juice 0.024000 1.000 1.000 13013211 13A Raspberry, juice babyfood 0.024000 1.000 1.000 86010000 O Water, direct, all sources 0.007500 1.000 1.000 86020000 O Water, indirect, all sources 0.007500 1.000 1.000 Triadimefon Dietary Exposure Assessment  RED DP Barcode: 314778 Page 30 of 36 Attachment 18. Chronic Residue Analysis for Triadimefon Food and Drinking Water ( Tees, greens and fairways)

U. S. Environmental Protection Agency Ver. 2.00 DEEM FCID Chronic analysis for TRIADIMEFON ( 1994 98 data) Residue file name: C:\ Documents and Settings\ spiper\ SPIPER\ triadimenol\ Triadimefon chronic ( 3 applications) tgf. R98 Adjustment factor # 2 used. Analysis Date 07 03 2006/ 08: 25: 11 Residue file dated: 07 03 2006/ 08: 24: 57/ 8 Reference dose ( RfD, Chronic) = .0034 mg/ kg bw/ day COMMENT 1: Food only + Tees and greens and fairways =============================================================================== Total exposure by population subgroup

Total Exposure  Population mg/ kg Percent of Subgroup body wt/ day Rfd    U. S. Population ( total) 0.000175 5.1%

U. S. Population ( spring season) 0.000173 5.1% U. S. Population ( summer season) 0.000188 5.5% U. S. Population ( autumn season) 0.000169 5.0% U. S. Population ( winter season) 0.000170 5.0%

Northeast region 0.000164 4.8% Midwest region 0.000176 5.2% Southern region 0.000164 4.8% Western region 0.000199 5.9%

Hispanics 0.000192 5.7% Non hispanic whites 0.000172 5.1% Non hispanic blacks 0.000164 4.8% Non hisp/ non white/ non black 0.000206 6.0%

All infants (< 1 year) 0.000544 16.0% Nursing infants 0.000203 6.0% Non nursing infants 0.000674 19.8% Children 1 6 yrs 0.000284 8.3% Children 7 12 yrs 0.000164 4.8%

Females 13 19 ( not preg or nursing) 0.000120 3.5% Females 20+ ( not preg or nursing) 0.000170 5.0% Females 13 50 yrs 0.000164 4.8% Females 13+ ( preg/ not nursing) 0.000161 4.7% Females 13+ ( nursing) 0.000230 6.8%

Males 13 19 yrs 0.000123 3.6% Males 20+ yrs 0.000152 4.5% Seniors 55+ 0.000168 4.9%

Children 1 2 yrs 0.000326 9.6% Children 3 5 yrs 0.000276 8.1% Children 6 12 yrs 0.000173 5.1% Youth 13 19 yrs 0.000122 3.6% Adults 20 49 yrs 0.000158 4.6% Adults 50+ yrs 0.000168 4.9% Females 13 49 yrs 0.000158 4.6%

 Triadimefon Dietary Exposure Assessment  RED DP Barcode: 314778 Page 31 of 36 Attachment 19. Chronic Residue Input Data for Food and Drinking Water ( Entire Course)

U. S. Environmental Protection Agency Ver. 2.00 DEEM FCID Chronic analysis for TRIADIMEFON 1994 98 data Residue file: C:\ Documents and Settings\ spiper\ SPIPER\ triadimenol\ Triadimefon chronic ( 3 applications) entiregolf. R98 Adjust. # 2 used Analysis Date 07 03 2006 Residue file dated: 07 03 2006/ 08: 26: 41/ 8 Reference dose ( RfD) = 0.0034 mg/ kg bw/ day Comment: Food only + Tees and greens and entire course  Food Crop Residue Adj. Factors Comment EPA Code Grp Food Name ( ppm) # 1 # 2        11000070 11 Apple, fruit with peel 0.000140 1.000 1.000 11000080 11 Apple, peeled fruit 0.000140 1.000 1.000 11000081 11 Apple, peeled fruit babyfood 0.000140 1.000 1.000 11000090 11 Apple, dried 0.001300 8.000 1.000 11000091 11 Apple, dried babyfood 0.001300 8.000 1.000 11000100 11 Apple, juice 0.000140 0.600 1.000 11000101 11 Apple, juice babyfood 0.000140 0.600 1.000 11000110 11 Apple, sauce 0.000140 1.000 1.000 11000111 11 Apple, sauce babyfood 0.000140 1.000 1.000 95001750 O Grape 0.027000 1.000 1.000 95001760 O Grape, juice 0.027000 1.000 1.000 95001761 O Grape, juice babyfood 0.027000 1.000 1.000 95001770 O Grape, leaves 0.027000 1.000 1.000 95001780 O Grape, raisin 0.027000 4.000 1.000 95001790 O Grape, wine and sherry 0.027000 1.000 1.000 11002660 11 Pear 0.001000 1.000 1.000 11002661 11 Pear babyfood 0.001000 1.000 1.000 11002670 11 Pear, dried 0.001000 6.250 1.000 11002680 11 Pear, juice 0.001000 1.000 1.000 11002681 11 Pear, juice babyfood 0.001000 1.000 1.000 95002790 O Pineapple 0.001000 1.000 1.000 95002791 O Pineapple babyfood 0.001000 1.000 1.000 95002800 O Pineapple, dried 0.001000 5.000 1.000 95002810 O Pineapple, juice 0.001000 1.000 1.000 95002811 O Pineapple, juice babyfood 0.001000 1.000 1.000 13013200 13A Raspberry 0.024000 1.000 1.000 13013201 13A Raspberry babyfood 0.024000 1.000 1.000 13013210 13A Raspberry, juice 0.024000 1.000 1.000 13013211 13A Raspberry, juice babyfood 0.024000 1.000 1.000 86010000 O Water, direct, all sources 0.022000 1.000 1.000 86020000 O Water, indirect, all sources 0.022000 1.000 1.000 Attachment 20. Chronic Residue Analysis for Triadimefon Food and Drinking Water ( Entire Course)

U. S. Environmental Protection Agency Ver. 2.00 DEEM FCID Chronic analysis for TRIADIMEFON ( 1994 98 data) Residue file name: C:\ Documents and Settings\ spiper\ SPIPER\ triadimenol\ Triadimefon chronic ( 3 applications) entiregolf. R98 Adjustment factor # 2 used. Analysis Date 07 03 2006/ 08: 26: 54 Residue file dated: 07 03 2006/ 08: 26: 41/ 8 Reference dose ( RfD, Chronic) = .0034 mg/ kg bw/ day COMMENT 1: Food only + Tees and greens and entire course =============================================================================== Total exposure by population subgroup

Total Exposure  Population mg/ kg Percent of Subgroup body wt/ day Rfd    Triadimefon Dietary Exposure Assessment  RED DP Barcode: 314778 Page 32 of 36 U. S. Population ( total) 0.000480 14.1%

U. S. Population ( spring season) 0.000476 14.0% U. S. Population ( summer season) 0.000516 15.2% U. S. Population ( autumn season) 0.000464 13.7% U. S. Population ( winter season) 0.000465 13.7%

Northeast region 0.000443 13.0% Midwest region 0.000485 14.3% Southern region 0.000455 13.4% Western region 0.000549 16.2%

Hispanics 0.000539 15.9% Non hispanic whites 0.000470 13.8% Non hispanic blacks 0.000454 13.4% Non hisp/ non white/ non black 0.000580 17.1%

All infants (< 1 year) 0.001546 45.5% Nursing infants 0.000574 16.9% Non nursing infants 0.001915 56.3% Children 1 6 yrs 0.000711 20.9% Children 7 12 yrs 0.000441 13.0%

Females 13 19 ( not preg or nursing) 0.000335 9.9% Females 20+ ( not preg or nursing) 0.000475 14.0% Females 13 50 yrs 0.000460 13.5% Females 13+ ( preg/ not nursing) 0.000458 13.5% Females 13+ ( nursing) 0.000653 19.2%

Males 13 19 yrs 0.000348 10.2% Males 20+ yrs 0.000425 12.5% Seniors 55+ 0.000468 13.8%

Children 1 2 yrs 0.000780 22.9% Children 3 5 yrs 0.000701 20.6% Children 6 12 yrs 0.000466 13.7% Youth 13 19 yrs 0.000343 10.1% Adults 20 49 yrs 0.000443 13.0% Adults 50+ yrs 0.000468 13.8% Females 13 49 yrs 0.000442 13.0%

Attachment 21. Acute Food Only Critical Exposure Contribution Analysis U. S. Environmental Protection Agency DEEM FCID Acute Critical Exposure Contribution Analysis ( Ver 2.02) CSFII 1994 98 Residue file = C:\ Documents and Settings\ spiper\ SPIPER\ triadimenol\ Triadimefon acute ( 3 applications) 6 27 2006 FOOD ONLY. R98 Date and time of analysis: 07 03 2006 08: 33: 15 Daily totals for food and foodform consumption used. Adjustment factor # 2 used. Minimum exposure contribution = 10% Monte Carlo Iterations = 1000 Seed = 10 CEC records generated for first 97 iterations. Exposures divided by body weight Subpopulations: 1 U. S. Population 2 All infants 3 Children 1 2 yrs 4 Children 3 5 yrs 5 Children 6 12 yrs ================================================================================ U. S. Population Low percentile for CEC records: 99 Exposure ( mg/ day) = 0.000097 High percentile for CEC records: 100 Exposure ( mg/ day) = 0.107936 Triadimefon Dietary Exposure Assessment  RED DP Barcode: 314778 Page 33 of 36 Number of actual records in this interval: 82168 Critical foods/ foodforms for this population ( as derived from these records): N= number of appearances in all records ( including duplicates) %= percent of total exposure for all records ( including duplicates)

Food FF N Percent Food Name      95002810 110 20290 20.15% Pineapple, juice Uncooked; Fresh or N/ S; Cook Meth N/ S 95001760 110 4600 15.46% Grape, juice Uncooked; Fresh or N/ S; Cook Meth N/ S 95001760 240 6441 11.49% Grape, juice Cooked; Canned; Cook Meth N/ S 95002810 240 23891 9.32% Pineapple, juice Cooked; Canned; Cook Meth N/ S 95001750 110 4695 8.39% Grape Uncooked; Fresh or N/ S; Cook Meth N/ S 95002790 240 13411 7.47% Pineapple Cooked; Canned; Cook Meth N/ S ================================================================================ All infants Low percentile for CEC records: 99 Exposure ( mg/ day) = 0.000231 High percentile for CEC records: 100 Exposure ( mg/ day) = 0.081150 Number of actual records in this interval: 2816 Critical foods/ foodforms for this population ( as derived from these records): N= number of appearances in all records ( including duplicates) %= percent of total exposure for all records ( including duplicates)

Food FF N Percent Food Name      95001761 240 327 17.43% Grape, juice babyfood Cooked; Canned; Cook Meth N/ S 95002810 110 582 17.40% Pineapple, juice Uncooked; Fresh or N/ S; Cook Meth N/ S 95001760 240 133 14.41% Grape, juice Cooked; Canned; Cook Meth N/ S 95002810 240 596 10.04% Pineapple, juice Cooked; Canned; Cook Meth N/ S 95001760 110 122 9.84% Grape, juice Uncooked; Fresh or N/ S; Cook Meth N/ S 11002661 240 447 8.66% Pear babyfood Cooked; Canned; Cook Meth N/ S PID HH Indiv Day Sex Age Bw kg NF NX Tot Expos Samplwt ================================================================================

Children 1 2 yrs Low percentile for CEC records: 99 Exposure ( mg/ day) = 0.000446 High percentile for CEC records: 100 Exposure ( mg/ day) = 0.107936 Number of actual records in this interval: 4133 Critical foods/ foodforms for this population ( as derived from these records): N= number of appearances in all records ( including duplicates) %= percent of total exposure for all records ( including duplicates)

Food FF N Percent Food Name      95001760 110 784 31.11% Grape, juice Uncooked; Fresh or N/ S; Cook Meth N/ S 95002810 110 1442 18.61% Pineapple, juice Uncooked; Fresh or N/ S; Cook Meth N/ S 95001760 240 561 14.96% Grape, juice Cooked; Canned; Cook Meth N/ S 95001780 130 298 10.35% Grape, raisin Uncooked; Dried; Cook Meth N/ S 95001750 110 261 7.99% Grape Uncooked; Fresh or N/ S; Cook Meth N/ S 95002790 240 462 3.46% Pineapple Cooked; Canned; Cook Meth N/ S 95002810 240 882 3.35% Pineapple, juice Cooked; Canned; Cook Meth N/ S ================================================================================ Children 3 5 yrs Low percentile for CEC records: 99 Exposure ( mg/ day) = 0.000268 High percentile for CEC records: 100 Exposure ( mg/ day) = 0.079252 Number of actual records in this interval: 9597 Critical foods/ foodforms for this population ( as derived from these records): N= number of appearances in all records ( including duplicates) %= percent of total exposure for all records ( including duplicates)

Food FF N Percent Food Name      95001760 110 1388 22.98% Grape, juice Uncooked; Fresh or N/ S; Cook Meth N/ S Triadimefon Dietary Exposure Assessment  RED DP Barcode: 314778 Page 34 of 36 95002810 110 2996 17.69% Pineapple, juice Uncooked; Fresh or N/ S; Cook Meth N/ S 95001760 240 1538 17.47% Grape, juice Cooked; Canned; Cook Meth N/ S 95001750 110 882 13.76% Grape Uncooked; Fresh or N/ S; Cook Meth N/ S 95001780 130 529 7.90% Grape, raisin Uncooked; Dried; Cook Meth N/ S 95002790 240 1096 5.37% Pineapple Cooked; Canned; Cook Meth N/ S 95002810 240 1801 3.29% Pineapple, juice Cooked; Canned; Cook Meth N/ S 13013200 240 300 2.28% Raspberry Cooked; Canned; Cook Meth N/ S ================================================================================ Children 6 12 yrs Low percentile for CEC records: 99 Exposure ( mg/ day) = 0.000139 High percentile for CEC records: 100 Exposure ( mg/ day) = 0.033388 Number of actual records in this interval: 4718 Critical foods/ foodforms for this population ( as derived from these records): N= number of appearances in all records ( including duplicates) %= percent of total exposure for all records ( including duplicates)

Food FF N Percent Food Name      95002810 110 1959 24.90% Pineapple, juice Uncooked; Fresh or N/ S; Cook Meth N/ S 95001760 110 472 18.71% Grape, juice Uncooked; Fresh or N/ S; Cook Meth N/ S 95001760 240 482 13.87% Grape, juice Cooked; Canned; Cook Meth N/ S 95001750 110 337 10.99% Grape Uncooked; Fresh or N/ S; Cook Meth N/ S Attachment 22. Usage Report in Support of Reregistration for Triadimefon.

Triadimefon ( 109901) Screening Level Usage Analysis ( SLUA) Date: 6/ 2/ 05 What is a Screening Level Usage Analysis ( SLUA)? · Available estimates of pesticide usage data for a particular active ingredient that is used on agricultural crops in the United States.

What does it contain? · Pesticide usage data for a single active ingredient only. · Agricultural use sites ( crops) that the pesticide is reported to be used on. · Available pesticide usage information ( i. e., does not include all of the United States). · Annual percent of crop treated ( average & maximum) for each agricultural crop. · Average annual pounds of the pesticide applied for each agricultural crop ( i. e., for the states surveyed, not for the entire United States).

What assumptions can I make about the reported data? · Average pounds of active ingredient applied  Values are calculated by merging pesticide usage data sources together; averaging by year, averaging across all years, & then rounding. Note: If the estimated value is less than 500, then that value is labeled < 500. Estimated values between 500 & < 1,000,000 are rounded to 1 significant digit. Estimated values of 1,000,000 or greater are rounded to 2 significant digits.) · Average percent of crop treated  Values are calculated by merging data sources together; averaging by year, averaging across all years, & rounding to the nearest multiple of 5. Note: If the estimated value is less than 1, then the value is labeled Triadimefon Dietary Exposure Assessment  RED DP Barcode: 314778 Page 35 of 36 < 1. · Maximum percent of crop treated  Value is the single maximum value reported across all data sources, across all years, & rounded up to the nearest multiple of 5. Note: If the estimated value is less than 2.5, then the value is labeled < 2.5.

What are the data sources used? · USDA NASS ( United States Department of Agriculture's National Agricultural Statistics Service)   pesticide usage data from 1998 to 2003. · NCFAP ( National Center for Food and Agricultural Policy)   pesticide usage data from 1997 & is only used if data is not available from the other sources. · Private pesticide market research   pesticide usage data from 1998 to 2003. · California DPR data can be requested separately.

What are the limitations to the data? · Additional registered uses may exist but are not included because the available surveys do not report usage ( e. g., small acreage crops). · Lack of reported usage data for the pesticide on a crop does not imply zero usage. · Usage data on a particular site may be noted in data sources, but not quantified. · In these instances, the site would not be reported in the SLUA. · Non agricultural use sites ( e. g., turf, post harvest, mosquito control, etc.) are not reported in the SLUA. A separate request must be made to receive these estimates.

Who do I contact for further information and/ or questions on this SLUA? · ( Jenna Carter, Botanist, BEAD)/( John O'Neill, Analyst, BEAD) · (( 703) 308 8370, carter. jenna@ epa. gov)/ (( 703) 308 8118, Oneill. John @ epa. gov)

Tuesday, May 31, 2005 13: 46 Screening Level Estimates of Agricultural Uses of Triadimefon ( 109901) Sorted Alphabetically Crop Lbs. A. I. Percent Crop Treated Avg. Max. 1 Almonds < 500 < 1 < 2.5 2 Apples 4,000 5 10 3 Artichokes ( NCFAP ' 97) < 500 30 4 Asparagus ( NCFAP ' 97) < 500 15 5 Cabbage ( NCFAP ' 97) < 500 10 6 Cantaloupes < 500 < 1 10 7 Cherries < 500 < 1 < 2.5 8 Cucumbers < 500 < 1 < 2.5 9 Grapes 1,000 < 1 5 10 Honeydew < 500 5 5 11 Pears 1,000 5 5 12 Pumpkins 1,000 5 15 13 Raspberries ( NCFAP ' 97) < 500 50 Triadimefon Dietary Exposure Assessment  RED DP Barcode: 314778 Page 36 of 36 14 Squash < 500 < 1 5 15 Sugar Beets < 500 < 1 < 2.5 16 Watermelons < 500 < 1 5 17 Wheat 1,000 < 1 < 2.5 ______________________________________

All numbers rounded. '< 500' indicates less than 500 pounds of active ingredient. '< 2.5' indicates less than 2.5 percent of crop is treated.