[Federal Register Volume 88, Number 104 (Wednesday, May 31, 2023)]
[Notices]
[Pages 34884-34885]
[FR Doc No: 2023-11543]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY

Federal Emergency Management Agency

[Internal Agency Docket No. FEMA-4708-DR; Docket ID FEMA-2023-0001]

Nevada; Major Disaster and Related Determinations

AGENCY: Federal Emergency Management Agency, DHS.

ACTION: Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: This is a notice of the Presidential declaration of a major
disaster for the State of Nevada (FEMA-4708-DR), dated April 27, 2023,
and related determinations.

DATES: The declaration was issued April 27, 2023.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Dean Webster, Office of Response and
Recovery, Federal Emergency Management Agency, 500 C Street SW,
Washington, DC 20472,<PHONE_NUMBER>.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Notice is hereby given that, in a letter
dated April 27, 2023, the President issued a major disaster declaration
under the authority of the Robert T. Stafford Disaster Relief and
Emergency Assistance Act, 42 U.S.C. 5121 et seq. (the ``Stafford
Act''), as follows:

    I have determined that the damage in certain areas of the State
of Nevada resulting from severe winter storms, flooding, landslides,
and mudslides during the period of March 8 to March 19, 2023, is of
sufficient severity and magnitude to warrant a major disaster
declaration under the Robert T. Stafford Disaster Relief and
Emergency Assistance Act, 42 U.S.C. 5121 et seq. (the ``Stafford
Act''). Therefore, I declare that such a major disaster exists in
the State of Nevada.
    In order to provide Federal assistance, you are hereby
authorized to allocate from funds available for these purposes such
amounts as you find necessary for Federal disaster assistance and
administrative expenses.

    You are authorized to provide Public Assistance in the
designated areas and Hazard Mitigation throughout the State.
Consistent with the requirement that Federal assistance be
supplemental, any Federal funds provided under the Stafford Act for
Public Assistance and Hazard Mitigation will be limited to 75
percent of the total eligible costs.
    Further, you are authorized to make changes to this declaration
for the approved assistance to the extent allowable under the
Stafford Act.

    The Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA) hereby gives notice
that pursuant to the authority vested in the Administrator, under
Executive Order 12148, as amended, Maona N. Ngwira, of FEMA is
appointed to act as the Federal Coordinating Officer for this major
disaster.
    The following areas of the State of Nevada have been designated as
adversely affected by this major disaster:

    Douglas, Eureka, Lincoln, Lyon, Mineral, and Storey Counties for
Public Assistance.
    All areas within the State of Nevada are eligible for assistance
under the Hazard Mitigation Grant Program.

    The following Catalog of Federal Domestic Assistance Numbers
(CFDA) are to be used for reporting and drawing funds: 97.030,
Community Disaster Loans; 97.031, Cora Brown Fund; 97.032, Crisis
Counseling; 97.033, Disaster Legal Services; 97.034, Disaster
Unemployment Assistance (DUA); 97.046, Fire Management Assistance
Grant; 97.048, Disaster Housing Assistance to Individuals and
Households In Presidentially Declared Disaster Areas; 97.049,
Presidentially Declared Disaster Assistance--Disaster Housing
Operations for Individuals and Households; 97.050, Presidentially
Declared Disaster Assistance to Individuals and Households--Other
Needs; 97.036, Disaster Grants--Public Assistance (Presidentially
Declared Disasters); 97.039, Hazard Mitigation Grant.

Deanne Criswell,
Administrator, Federal Emergency Management Agency.
[FR Doc. 2023-11543 Filed 5-30-23; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 9111-23-P


[Federal Register Volume 77, Number 55 (Wednesday, March 21, 2012)]
[Proposed Rules]
[Pages 16488-16490]
[FR Doc No: 2012-6805]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION

Federal Aviation Administration

14 CFR Part 39

[Docket No. FAA-2012-0271; Directorate Identifier 2011-NM-196-AD]
RIN 2120-AA64

Airworthiness Directives; Bombardier, Inc. Airplanes

AGENCY: Federal Aviation Administration (FAA), DOT.

ACTION: Notice of proposed rulemaking (NPRM).

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: We propose to adopt a new airworthiness directive (AD) for
certain Bombardier, Inc. Model DHC-8-100, DHC-8-200, and DHC-8-300
series airplanes. This proposed AD was prompted by reports of hydraulic
accumulator screw cap or end cap failure. This proposed AD would
require replacing the affected parking brake accumulator. We are
proposing this AD to prevent failure of the parking brake accumulator
screw caps or end caps, which could result in loss of the number 2
hydraulic system and damage to airplane structures, and could
potentially have an adverse effect on the controllability of the
airplane.

DATES: We must receive comments on this proposed AD by May 7, 2012.

ADDRESSES: You may send comments by any of the following methods:
     Federal eRulemaking Portal: Go to http://www.regulations.gov. Follow the instructions for submitting comments.
     Fax:<PHONE_NUMBER>.
     Mail: U.S. Department of Transportation, Docket
Operations, M-30, West Building Ground Floor, Room W12-140, 1200 New
Jersey Avenue SE., Washington, DC 20590.
     Hand Delivery: U.S. Department of Transportation, Docket
Operations, M-30, West Building Ground Floor, Room W12-140, 1200 New
Jersey Avenue SE., Washington, DC, between 9 a.m. and 5 p.m., Monday
through Friday, except Federal holidays.
    For service information identified in this proposed AD, contact
Bombardier, Inc., Q-Series Technical Help Desk, 123 Garratt Boulevard,
Toronto, Ontario M3K 1Y5, Canada; telephone<PHONE_NUMBER>; fax 416-375-
4539; email<EMAIL_ADDRESS>Internet http://www.bombardier.com. You may review copies of the referenced service
information at the FAA, Transport Airplane Directorate, 1601 Lind
Avenue SW., Renton, Washington. For information on the availability of
this material at the FAA, call<PHONE_NUMBER>.

Examining the AD Docket

    You may examine the AD docket on the Internet at http://www.regulations.gov; or in person at the Docket Operations office
between 9 a.m. and 5 p.m., Monday through Friday, except Federal
holidays. The AD docket contains this proposed AD, the regulatory
evaluation, any comments received, and other information. The street
address for the Docket Operations office (telephone<PHONE_NUMBER>) is
in the ADDRESSES section. Comments will be available in the AD docket
shortly after receipt.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Cesar Gomez, Aerospace Engineer,
Airframe and Mechanical Systems Branch, ANE-171, FAA, New York Aircraft
Certification Office, 1600 Stewart Avenue, Suite 410, Westbury, New
York 11590; telephone<PHONE_NUMBER>; fax<PHONE_NUMBER>.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

Comments Invited

    We invite you to send any written relevant data, views, or
arguments about this proposed AD. Send your comments to an address
listed under the ADDRESSES section. Include ``Docket No. FAA-2012-0271;
Directorate Identifier 2011-NM-196-AD'' at the beginning of your
comments. We specifically invite comments on the overall regulatory,
economic, environmental, and energy aspects of this proposed AD. We
will consider all comments received by the closing date and may amend
this proposed AD based on those comments.
    We will post all comments we receive, without change, to http://www.regulations.gov, including any personal information you provide. We
will also post a report summarizing each substantive verbal contact we
receive about this proposed AD.

Discussion

    Transport Canada Civil Aviation (TCCA), which is the aviation
authority for Canada, has issued Canadian Airworthiness Directive CF-
2011-29, dated August 2, 2011 (referred to after this as ``the MCAI''),
to correct an unsafe condition for the specified products. The MCAI
states:

    Seven cases of on-ground hydraulic accumulator screw cap or end
cap failure have been experienced on CL-600-2B19 (CRJ) aeroplanes,
resulting in loss of the associated hydraulic system and high-energy
impact damage to adjacent systems and structure. To date, the lowest
number of flight cycles accumulated at the time of failure has been
6991.
    Although there have been no failures to date on any DHC-8
aeroplanes, similar accumulators to those installed on the CL-600-
2B19, Part Numbers (P/N)0860162001 and<PHONE_NUMBER> (Parking Brake
Accumulator), are installed on the aeroplanes listed in the
Applicability section of this [TCCA] directive.
    A detailed analysis of the systems and structure in the
potential line of trajectory of a failed screw cap/end cap for the
accumulator has been conducted. It has identified that the worst-
case scenarios would be the loss of number 2 hydraulic system, and
damage to aeroplane structures.
    This [TCCA] directive gives instructions to determine the part
number and serial number of the existing parking brake accumulator,
and where applicable, replace the accumulator.

Failure of the parking brake accumulator screw caps and/or end caps
could result in loss of the number 2 hydraulic system, and damage to
airplane structures, and could potentially have an adverse effect on
the controllability of the airplane. You may obtain further information
by examining the MCAI in the AD docket.

Relevant Service Information

    Bombardier, Inc. has issued Service Bulletin 8-32-170, dated
February 25, 2011; and Service Bulletin 8-32-172, dated March 15, 2011.
The actions described in this service information are intended to
correct the unsafe condition identified in the MCAI.

FAA's Determination and Requirements of This Proposed AD

    This product has been approved by the aviation authority of another
country, and is approved for operation in the United States. Pursuant
to our bilateral agreement with the State of Design Authority, we have
been notified of the unsafe condition described in the MCAI and service
information referenced above. We are proposing this AD because we
evaluated all pertinent information and determined an unsafe condition
exists and is likely to exist or develop on other products of the same
type design.

Costs of Compliance

    Based on the service information, we estimate that this proposed AD
would affect about 129 products of U.S. registry. We also estimate that
it would take about 2 work-hours per product to comply with the basic
requirements of this proposed AD. The average labor rate is $85 per
work-hour. Based on these figures, we estimate the cost of the proposed
AD on U.S. operators to be $21,930, or $170 per product.
    In addition, we estimate that any necessary follow-on actions would
take about 3 work-hours and require parts costing $1,625, for a cost of
$1,880 per product. We have no way of determining the number of
products that may need these actions.

Authority for This Rulemaking

    Title 49 of the United States Code specifies the FAA's authority to
issue rules on aviation safety. Subtitle I, section 106, describes the
authority of the FAA Administrator. ``Subtitle VII: Aviation
Programs,'' describes in more detail the scope of the Agency's
authority.
    We are issuing this rulemaking under the authority described in
``Subtitle VII, Part A, Subpart III, Section 44701: General
requirements.'' Under that section, Congress charges the FAA with
promoting safe flight of civil aircraft in air commerce by prescribing
regulations for practices, methods, and procedures the Administrator
finds necessary for safety in air commerce. This regulation is within
the scope of that authority because it addresses an unsafe condition
that is likely to exist or develop on products identified in this
rulemaking action.

Regulatory Findings

    We determined that this proposed AD would not have federalism
implications under Executive Order 13132. This proposed AD would not
have a substantial direct effect on the States, on the relationship
between the national Government and the States, or on the distribution
of power and responsibilities among the various levels of government.
    For the reasons discussed above, I certify this proposed
regulation:
    1. Is not a ``significant regulatory action'' under Executive Order
12866;
    2. Is not a ``significant rule'' under the DOT Regulatory Policies
and Procedures (44 FR 11034, February 26, 1979);
    3. Will not affect intrastate aviation in Alaska; and
    4. Will not have a significant economic impact, positive or
negative, on a substantial number of small entities under the criteria
of the Regulatory Flexibility Act.
    We prepared a regulatory evaluation of the estimated costs to
comply with this proposed AD and placed it in the AD docket.

List of Subjects in 14 CFR Part 39

    Air transportation, Aircraft, Aviation safety, Incorporation by
reference, Safety.

The Proposed Amendment

    Accordingly, under the authority delegated to me by the
Administrator, the FAA proposes to amend 14 CFR part 39 as follows:

PART 39--AIRWORTHINESS DIRECTIVES

    1. The authority citation for part 39 continues to read as follows:

    Authority:  49 U.S.C. 106(g), 40113, 44701.

Sec.  39.13  [Amended]

    2. The FAA amends Sec.  39.13 by adding the following new AD:

Bombardier, Inc.: Docket No. FAA-2012-0271; Directorate Identifier
2011-NM-196-AD.

(a) Comments Due Date

    We must receive comments by May 7, 2012.

(b) Affected ADs

    None.

(c) Applicability

    This AD applies to Bombardier, Inc. Model DHC-8-101, -102, -103,
-106, -201, -202, -301, -311 and, -315 airplanes, certificated in
any category, serial numbers 003 and subsequent.

(d) Subject

    Air Transport Association (ATA) of America Code 32: Landing
gear.

(e) Reason

    This AD was prompted by reports of hydraulic accumulator screw
cap or end cap failure. We are issuing this AD to prevent failure of
the parking brake accumulator screw caps or end caps, which could
result in loss of the number 2 hydraulic system and damage to
airplane structures, and could potentially have an adverse effect on
the controllability of the airplane.

(f) Compliance

    You are responsible for having the actions required by this AD
performed within the compliance times specified, unless the actions
have already been done.

(g) Inspection and Replacement

    Within 2,000 flight hours or 12 months after the effective date
of this AD, whichever comes first: Inspect to determine the part
number (P/N) and serial number of the parking brake hydraulic
accumulator, in accordance with the Accomplishment Instructions of
Bombardier Service Bulletin 8-32-170, dated February 25, 2011. A
review of airplane maintenance records is acceptable in lieu of this
inspection if the part number and serial number of the parking brake
hydraulic accumulator can be conclusively determined from that
review.
    (1) For accumulators not having P/N<PHONE_NUMBER> or<PHONE_NUMBER>: No
further action is required by this paragraph.
    (2) For accumulators having P/N<PHONE_NUMBER> or<PHONE_NUMBER>: Before
further flight, do the applicable actions specified in paragraphs
(g)(2)(i) and (g)(2)(ii) of this AD.
    (i) If the serial number is listed in the table in paragraph
3.B.(2) of Bombardier Service Bulletin 8-32-170, dated February 25,
2011: No further action is required by this paragraph.
    (ii) If the serial number is not listed in the table in
paragraph 3.B.(2) of Bombardier Service Bulletin 8-32-170, dated
February 25, 2011: Within 2,000 flight hours or 12 months after the
effective date of this AD, whichever comes first, replace the
accumulator with a new non-suspect accumulator, in accordance with
the Accomplishment Instructions of Bombardier Service Bulletin 8-32-
172, dated March 15, 2011.

(h) Parts Installation

    As of the effective date of this AD, no person may install a
parking brake accumulator, P/N<PHONE_NUMBER> or<PHONE_NUMBER> with a
serial number that is not listed in the table in paragraph 3.B.(2)
of Bombardier Service Bulletin 8-32-170, dated February 25, 2011, on
any airplane.

(i) Other FAA AD Provisions

    The following provisions also apply to this AD:
    (1) Alternative Methods of Compliance (AMOCs): The Manager, New
York Aircraft Certification Office (ACO), ANE-170, FAA, has the
authority to approve AMOCs for this AD, if requested using the
procedures found in 14 CFR 39.19. In accordance with 14 CFR 39.19,
send your request to your principal inspector or local Flight
Standards District Office, as appropriate. If sending information
directly to the ACO, send it to ATTN: Program Manager, Continuing
Operational Safety, FAA, New York ACO, 1600 Stewart Avenue, Suite
410, Westbury, New York 11590; telephone<PHONE_NUMBER>; fax 516-794-
5531. Before using any approved AMOC, notify your appropriate
principal inspector, or lacking a principal inspector, the manager
of the local flight standards district office/certificate holding
district office. The AMOC approval letter must specifically
reference this AD.
    (2) Airworthy Product: For any requirement in this AD to obtain
corrective actions from a manufacturer or other source, use these
actions if they are FAA-approved. Corrective actions are considered
FAA-approved if they are approved by the State of Design Authority
(or their delegated agent). You are required to assure the product
is airworthy before it is returned to service.

(j) Related Information

    Refer to MCAI Canadian Airworthiness Directive CF-2011-29, dated
August 2, 2011; and the service information identified in paragraphs
(j)(1) and (j)(2) of this AD; for related information.
    (1) Bombardier Service Bulletin 8-32-170, dated February 25,
2011.
    (2) Bombardier Service Bulletin 8-32-172, dated March 15, 2011.

    Issued in Renton, Washington, on March 9, 2012.
Ali Bahrami,
Manager, Transport Airplane Directorate, Aircraft Certification
Service.
[FR Doc. 2012-6805 Filed 3-20-12; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910-13-P


[Federal Register Volume 76, Number 180 (Friday, September 16, 2011)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Pages 57636-57637]
[FR Doc No: 2011-23732]

=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

17 CFR Part 200

[Release No. PA-47 ; File No. S7-19-11]

Privacy Act of 1974: Implementation and Amendment of Exemptions

AGENCY: Securities and Exchange Commission.

ACTION: Final rule.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Securities and Exchange Commission (``SEC'' or
``Commission'') is adopting a rule to amend its Privacy Act regulations
to exempt portions of three new systems of records and to make
technical amendments to its current inventory of exempted systems of
records. Specifically, application of the exemptions to the three new
systems of records is necessary to protect information compiled for law
enforcement purposes.

DATES: Effective Date: October 17, 2011.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Cristal Perpignan, Acting Chief
Privacy Officer, Office of Information Technology,<PHONE_NUMBER>.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
    Background: On May 24, 2011, SEC published notice of three new
Privacy Act systems of records entitled Tips, Complaints, and Referrals
(TCR) Records (SEC-63)'', ``SEC Security in the Workplace Incident
Records (SEC-64)'', and ``Investor Response Information System (IRIS)
(SEC-65)''; and to revise two existing systems of records at Release
No. PA-46, (May 18, 2011), 76 FR 30213 (May 24, 2011). In conjunction
with publication of the systems of records notice, the SEC published,
with invitation to comment, a proposed rule to exempt the new systems
of records from 5 U.S.C. 552a(c)(3), (d), (e)(1), (e)(4)(G), (H), and
(I), and (f) of the Privacy Act and 17 CFR 200.303, 200.304, and
200.306; and to make technical amendments to its current inventory of
exempted systems of records at Release No. PA-45 (May 18, 2011), 76 FR
30048 (May 24, 2011). The TCR Records (SEC-63) system of records
contains records related to tips, complaints, referrals of misconduct,
or related information about actual or potential violations of the
federal securities laws; investor harm; conduct of public companies;
securities professionals; regulated entities; and associated persons.
This system of records may include investigatory materials that were
compiled in connection with the Commission's enforcement
responsibilities under the federal securities laws. Such material may
consist of unsolicited and often unverified statements concerning
individuals, information received from confidential sources, as well as
reports from the Commission's investigators and other law enforcement
personnel. The disclosure of the existence of investigatory materials
could seriously undermine effective enforcement of the federal
securities laws by prematurely alerting individuals to the fact that
they are under investigation, by giving them access to the evidentiary
bases for a Commission enforcement action or seriously hampering the
Commission's case in court or before an administrative law judge.
    The SEC Security in the Workplace Incident Records (SEC-64) system
of records contains records related to reports involving incidents of
assault, harassment, intimidation, bullying, weapons possession, or
threats at the SEC. This system of records may include investigatory
materials that were compiled in connection with inquiries or
investigation of potential or actual incidents of violence by and
against individuals at an SEC facility. The disclosure of information
as it relates to investigatory materials or the identity of sources of
information may seriously undermine the safety and security of
employees in the workplace. Access to such information could allow the
subject of an investigation or inquiry of an actual or potential
criminal or civil violation to interfere with and impede the
investigation, tamper with witnesses or evidence, and to avoid
detection or apprehension.
    The IRIS (SEC-65) system of records contains records related to
complaints/inquiries/requests from members of the public and others.
This system of records may include investigatory materials that were
compiled in connection with the Commission's enforcement
responsibilities under the federal securities laws. Such material may
consist of unsolicited and often unverified statements concerning
individuals, information received from confidential sources, as well as
reports from the Commission's investigators and other law enforcement
personnel. The disclosure of the existence of investigatory materials
could seriously undermine effective enforcement of the federal
securities laws by prematurely alerting individuals to the fact that
they are under investigation, by giving them access to the evidentiary
bases for a commission enforcement action or seriously hampering the
Commission's case in court or before an administrative law judge.
    The Commission is exempting SEC-63, SEC-64 and SEC-65 from 5 U.S.C.
552a(c)(3), (d), (e)(1), (e)(4)(G), (H), and (I), and (f) and 17 CFR
200.303, 200.304, and 200.306, insofar as they contain investigatory
materials compiled for law enforcement purposes; and amending its
existing inventory of exemptions by modifying the name of SEC 38 from
``Office of Personnel Code of Conduct and Employee Performance Files''
to ``Disciplinary and Adverse Actions, Employee Conduct, and Labor
Relations Files'' and by deleting reference to ``Personnel Security
Files'', which was published for deletion at Release No. PA-29 (July
28, 2000), 65 FR 49037(August10, 2000).
    Public Comments: The Commission received only one comment on the
proposal, but it did not address the specific exemptions; instead, the
commenter stated generally that he thought privacy should be preserved
and not taken away. We continue to believe the exemptions are
consistent with the Privacy Act because the exemptions protect
information relating to enforcement investigations from disclosure.

Paperwork Reduction Act

    This rule does not contain a ``collection of information''
requirement within the meaning of the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995,
so the Paperwork Reduction Act is not applicable.

Cost-Benefit Analysis

    The Commission is sensitive to the costs and benefits imposed by
its rules. The Privacy Act of 1974 directs each agency that proposes to
establish or make a significant change in a system of records to
publish in the Federal Register a notice of the existence and character
of the system. Government agencies may exempt certain records from
certain provisions of the Privacy Act, but to claim an exemption the

agency must issue a rule justifying the exemption.
    The new systems of records may include investigatory materials
compiled in connection with the Commission's enforcement of the federal
securities laws, in connection with potential or actual incidents of
workplace violence, or in connections with complaints, inquiries or
requests from the public. The Commission and investors will benefit
from the amendments, because in their absence the potential access to
or disclosure of the investigatory materials in these systems of
records could seriously undermine the effective enforcement of the
Federal securities laws, and could jeopardize the safety and security
of Commission employees in the workplace.
    We recognize that the proposed amendments may impose costs on
individuals who may wish to obtain access to records that contain
investigatory materials in these systems of records. We have no way of
estimating the potential number of individuals who might in the future
desire such access. Nevertheless, the benefits of exempting those
records from public access are compelling, and they clearly justify the
costs of the exemption. In addition, Congress was aware of such
potential costs when they promulgated the specific exemption in 5
U.S.C. 552a(k)(2). The Commission discussed these costs and benefits in
the proposing release and received no comments on them.

Regulatory Flexibility Act Certification

    Pursuant to the requirements of the Regulatory Flexibility Act, 5
U.S.C. 601-612, SEC certified that these regulations would not
significantly affect a substantial number of small entities. The rule
imposes no duties or obligations on small entities. Further, in
accordance with the provisions of the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995,
44 U.S.C. 3501, SEC has determined that this rule would not impose new
recordkeeping, application, reporting, or other types of information
collection requirements. The Commission provided this certification in
the proposing release and received no comments.

List of Subjects in 17 CFR Part 200

    Administrative practice and procedure; Privacy.

Text of Amendments

    For the reasons set out in the preamble, Title 17, Chapter II, of
the Code of Federal Regulations is amended as follows:

PART 200--ORGANIZATION; CONDUCT AND ETHICS; AND INFORMATION AND
REQUESTS

0
1. The authority citation for Part 200 is amended by adding authority
for Sec.  200.312 in numerical order to read as follows:

    Authority:  15 U.S.C. 77o, 77s, 77sss, 78d, 78d-1, 78d-2, 78w,
78ll(d), 78mm, 80a-37, 80b-11, and 7202, unless otherwise noted.
* * * * *
    Section 200.312 is also issued under 5 U.S.C. 552a(k).
* * * * *

Subpart H--Regulations Pertaining to the Privacy of Individuals and
Systems of Records Maintained by the Commission

0
2. Amend Sec.  200.312 by:
0
a. Removing ``and'' at the end of paragraph (a)(5);
0
b. Removing the period at the end of paragraph (a)(6) and adding a
semicolon in its place;
0
c. Adding paragraphs (a)(7), (a)(8) and (a)(9);
0
d. Revising paragraph (b); and
0
e. Removing the authority citation at the end of the section.
    The additions and revision read as follows.

Sec.  200.312  Specific exemptions.

* * * * *
    (a) * * *
    (7) Tips, Complaints, and Referrals (TCR) Records;
    (8) SEC Security in the Workplace Incident Records; and
    (9) Investor Response Information System (IRIS).
    (b) Pursuant to 5 U.S.C. 552a(k)(5), the system of records
containing the Commission's Disciplinary and Adverse Actions, Employee
Conduct, and Labor Relations Files shall be exempt from sections
(c)(3), (d), (e)(1), (e)(4)(G), (H), and (I), and (f) of the Privacy
Act, 5 U.S.C. 552a(c)(3), (d), (e)(1), (e)(4)(G), (e)(4)(H), and
(e)(4)(I), and (f), and 17 CFR 200.303, 200.304, and 200.306 insofar as
they contain investigatory material compiled to determine an
individual's suitability, eligibility, and qualifications for Federal
civilian employment or access to classified information, but only to
the extent that the disclosure of such material would reveal the
identity of a source who furnished information to the Government under
an express promise that the identity of the source would be held in
confidence, or, prior to September 27, 1975, under an implied promise
that the identity of the source would be held in confidence.

    By the Commission.

    Dated: September 12, 2011.
Elizabeth M. Murphy,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2011-23732 Filed 9-15-11; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 8011-01-P


[Federal Register Volume 76, Number 149 (Wednesday, August 3, 2011)]
[Notices]
[Page 46787]
[FR Doc No: 2011-19631]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission

Combined Notice of Filings No. 2

    Take notice that the Commission has received the following Natural
Gas Pipeline Rate and Refund Report filings:
    Docket Numbers: RP11-2170-001.
    Applicants: Florida Gas Transmission Company, LLC.
    Description: Florida Gas Transmission Company, LLC submits tariff
filing per 154.203: Future Contracting Compliance to be effective 12/5/
2011.
    Filed Date: 07/21/2011.
    Accession Number: 20110721-5117.
    Comment Date: 5 p.m. Eastern Time on Tuesday, August 02, 2011.

    Docket Numbers: RP10-896-001.
    Applicants: Granite State Gas Transmission, Inc.
    Description: Joint Petition of Granite State Gas Transmission,
Inc., et al. for Approval of Settlement Amendment and Amendment to
Stipulation and Agreement.
    Filed Date: 07/26/2011.
    Accession Number: 20110726-5092.
    Comment Date: 5 p.m. Eastern Time on Tuesday, August 02, 2011.

    Docket Numbers: RP10-1006-002.
    Applicants: Liberty Gas Storage, LLC.
    Description: Liberty Gas Storage, LLC submits tariff filing per
154.203: Liberty Gas Storage LLC Compliance Filing to be effective 9/1/
2011.
    Filed Date: 07/22/2011.
    Accession Number: 20110722-5103.
    Comment Date: 5 p.m. Eastern Time on Wednesday, August 03, 2011.

    Docket Numbers: RP11-2236-001.
    Applicants: Natural Gas Pipeline Company of America.
    Description: Natural Gas Pipeline Company of America LLC submits
tariff filing per 154.205(b): Amended Negotiated Rate Filing to be
effective 7/1/2011.
    Filed Date: 07/26/2011.
    Accession Number: 20110726-5091.
    Comment Date: 5 p.m. Eastern Time on Monday, August 08, 2011.

    Docket Numbers: RP11-1736-001.
    Applicants: Transcontinental Gas Pipe Line Company, LLC.
    Description: Transcontinental Gas Pipe Line Company, LLC submits
tariff filing per 154.203: Compliance Filing for GT&C Sections 2 and 18
(RP11-1736) to be effective 9/1/2011.
    Filed Date: 07/25/2011.
    Accession Number: 20110725-5106.
    Comment Date: 5 p.m. Eastern Time on Monday, August 08, 2011.

    Docket Numbers: RP11-2180-001.
    Applicants: Transcontinental Gas Pipe Line Company.
    Description: Transcontinental Gas Pipe Line Company, LLC submits
tariff filing per 154.203: Compliance Filing--Revision to Volume No. 2
Table of Contents to be effective 5/19/2011.
    Filed Date: 07/25/2011.
    Accession Number: 20110725-5107.
    Comment Date: 5 p.m. Eastern Time on Monday, August 08, 2011.
    Any person desiring to protest this filing must file in accordance
with Rule 211 of the Commission's Rules of Practice and Procedure (18
CFR 385.211). Protests to this filing will be considered by the
Commission in determining the appropriate action to be taken, but will
not serve to make protestants parties to the proceeding. Such protests
must be filed on or before 5 p.m. Eastern time on the specified comment
date. Anyone filing a protest must serve a copy of that document on all
the parties to the proceeding.
    The Commission encourages electronic submission of protests in lieu
of paper using the ``eFiling'' link at http://www.ferc.gov. Persons
unable to file electronically should submit an original and 14 copies
of the protest to the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission, 888 First
Street, NE., Washington, DC 20426.
    This filing is accessible on-line at http://www.ferc.gov, using the
``eLibrary'' link and is available for review in the Commission's
Public Reference Room in Washington, DC. There is an ``eSubscription''
link on the Web site that enables subscribers to receive e-mail
notification when a document is added to a subscribed docket(s). For
assistance with any FERC Online service, please e-mail
<EMAIL_ADDRESS>or call<PHONE_NUMBER> (toll free). For
TTY, call<PHONE_NUMBER>.

    Dated: July 27, 2011.
Nathaniel J. Davis, Sr.,
Deputy Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2011-19631 Filed 8-2-11; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6717-01-P


[Federal Register: November 4, 2010 (Volume 75, Number 213)]
[Notices]
[Page 67981-67983]
[DOCID:fr04no10-48]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES

Food and Drug Administration

[Docket No. FDA-2010-N-0543]

Agency Information Collection Activities; Proposed Collection;
Comment Request; Importer's Entry Notice

AGENCY: Food and Drug Administration, HHS.

ACTION: Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Food and Drug Administration (FDA) is announcing an
opportunity for public comment on the proposed collection of certain
information by the Agency. Under the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995
(the PRA), Federal agencies are required to publish notice in the
Federal Register concerning each proposed collection of information,
including each proposed revision of an existing collection of
information, and to allow 60 days for public comment in response to the
notice. This notice solicits comments on the revision of an approved
Office of Management and Budget (OMB) collection of information for
FDA's Importer's Entry Notice. This revision reflects additional burden
recognized as a result of including tobacco products to the list of
FDA-regulated products under the Family Smoking Prevention and Tobacco
Control Act (the Tobacco Control Act).

DATES: Submit either electronic or written comments on the collection
of information by January 3, 2011.

ADDRESSES: Submit electronic comments on the collection of information
to http://www.regulations.gov. Submit written comments on the
collection of information to the Division of Dockets Management (HFA-
305), Food and Drug Administration, 5630 Fishers Lane, rm. 1061,
Rockville, MD 20852. All comments should be identified with the docket
number found in brackets in the heading of this document.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Jonna Capezzuto, Office of Information
Management, Food and Drug Administration, 1350 Piccard Dr., PI50-400B,
Rockville, MD 20850,<PHONE_NUMBER><EMAIL_ADDRESS>
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Under the PRA (44 U.S.C. 3501-3520), Federal
agencies must obtain approval from OMB for each collection of
information they conduct or sponsor. ``Collection of information'' is
defined in 44 U.S.C. 3502(3) and 5 CFR 1320.3(c) and includes Agency
requests or requirements that members of the public submit reports,
keep records, or provide information to a third party. Section
3506(c)(2)(A) of the PRA (44 U.S.C. 3506(c)(2)(A)) requires Federal
agencies to provide a 60-day notice in the Federal Register concerning
each proposed collection of information, including each proposed
revision of an existing collection of information, before submitting
the collection to OMB for approval. To comply with this requirement,
FDA is publishing notice of the proposed collection of information set
forth in this document.
    With respect to the following collection of information, FDA
invites comments on these topics: (1) Whether the proposed collection
of information is necessary for the proper performance of FDA's
functions, including whether the information will have practical
utility; (2) the accuracy of FDA's estimate of the burden of the
proposed collection of information, including the validity of the
methodology and assumptions used; (3) ways to enhance the quality,
utility, and clarity of the information to be collected; and (4) ways
to minimize the burden of the collection of information on respondents,
including through the use of automated collection techniques, when
appropriate, and other forms of information technology.

Information Request Regarding Importer's Entry Notice--(OMB Control
Number 0910-0046)--Revision

    On June 22, 2009, the President signed the Tobacco Control Act
(Pub. L. 111-31) into law. The Tobacco Control Act amended the Federal
Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act (FD&C Act) by adding a new chapter
granting FDA important new authority to regulate the manufacture,
marketing, and distribution of tobacco products to

protect the public health generally and to reduce tobacco use by
minors.
    Section 801 of the FD&C Act, as amended by the Tobacco Control Act,
charges the Secretary of Health and Human Services (HHS), through the
FDA, with the responsibility of assuring foreign origin FDA regulated
foods, drugs, cosmetics, medical devices, radiological health, and
tobacco products offered for import into the United States meet the
same requirements of the FD&C Act as do domestic products, and for
preventing products from entering the country if they are not in
compliance. The discharge of this responsibility involves close
coordination and cooperation between FDA (headquarters and field
inspectional personnel) and the U.S. Customs Service (USCS), as the
USCS is responsible for enforcing the revenue laws covering the very
same products.
    This collection of information was approved by OMB on August 10,
2009, and received an expiration date of August 31, 2012 (ICR Reference
Number<PHONE_NUMBER>-006). However, because tobacco products had only
recently been added to FDA's listing of regulated products when this
collection of information was approved, the approved collection did not
reflect information regarding tobacco products offered for import into
and for prevention from them from entering the United States if they
did not meet the same requirements of the Act as domestic products. The
revision to this collection of information expands the universe of
respondents being regulated under the FD&C Act, as amended, to include
importers of tobacco products.
    In the most recent OMB approval of this information collection
package, FDA noted that in order to make an admissibility decision for
each entry, the Agency needed four additional pieces of information
that were not available from USCS's system. These data elements were
the FDA Product Code, FDA country of production, manufacturer/shipper,
and ultimate consignee. It was the ``automated'' collection of these
four data elements for which OMB approval was being requested. When
this package was sent to OMB for approval, FDA construed this request
as an extension of the prior approval of collection of this data via a
different media, i.e., paper. FDA noted that there were additional data
elements which filers could provide to FDA along with other entry-
related information. Doing so could result in their receiving an FDA
admissibility decision more expeditiously, e.g., the quantity, value,
and Affirmation(s) of Compliance with Qualifier(s).
    At each U.S. port of entry (seaport, landport, and airport) where
foreign-origin FDA-regulated products are offered for import, FDA is
notified, through Custom's Automated Commercial System (ACS) by the
importer (or his agent) of the arrival of each entry. Following such
notification, FDA reviews relevant data to ensure the imported product
meets the standards as are required for domestic products, makes an
admissibility decision, and informs the importer and USCS of its
decision. A single entry frequently contains multiple lines of
different products. FDA may authorize products listed on specific lines
to enter the United States unimpeded, while other products in the same
entry are to be held pending further FDA review/action.
    An important feature developed and programmed into FDA's automated
system is that all entry data passes through a screening criteria
module, which makes the initial screening decision on every entry of
foreign-origin FDA-regulated product. Almost instantaneously after the
entry is filed, the filer receives FDA's admissibility decision
covering each entry line, i.e., ``May Proceed'' or ``FDA Review.''
    Examples of FDA's need to further review an entry may result from
some products originating from a specific country or manufacturer known
to have a history of problems, FDA having no previous knowledge of the
foreign manufacturer and/or product, or a product import alert may have
been issued, etc. The system assists FDA entry reviewers by notifying
them of information, such as the issuance of import alerts, thus
averting the chance that such information will be missed in their
review.
    Since the inception of the interface with ACS, FDA's electronic
screening criteria program is applied nationwide. This eliminates
problems such as ``port shopping,'' e.g., attempts to intentionally
slip products through one FDA port when refused by another, or filing
entries at a port known to receive a high volume of entries. Every
electronically submitted entry line of foreign-origin FDA-regulated
product undergoes automated screening. The screening criteria can be
set to be as specific or as broad as applicable; changes are
immediately effective. This capability is of tremendous value in
protecting the public in the event there is a need to immediately halt
a specific product from entering the United States.
    FDA estimates the revised reporting burden for this collection of
information is as follows:

                                 Table 1--Estimated Annual Reporting Burden \1\
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
                                                      Annual
      FDA imported products          Number of     frequency per   Total annual      Hours per      Total hours
                                    respondents      response        responses       response
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Non-Tobacco (approved by OMB 09/           3,406           1,089       3,709,134             .14         519,279
 01/2009).......................
Tobacco (new estimated burden)..             200              68          13,600             .14           1,904
                                 -------------------------------------------------------------------------------
    Total.......................           3,606  ..............       3,722,734             .28         521,183
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
\1\ There are no capital costs or operating and maintenance costs associated with this collection of
  information.

    Dated: October 25, 2010.
Leslie Kux,
Acting Assistant Commissioner for Policy.
[FR Doc. 2010-27850 Filed 11-3-10; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4160-01-P


[Federal Register Volume 78, Number 215 (Wednesday, November 6, 2013)]
[Notices]
[Pages 66698-66700]
[FR Doc No: 2013-26244]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY

[EPA-HQ-OPP-2013-0406; FRL-9400-2]

Pesticides; Repellency Awareness Graphic; Notice of Availability

AGENCY: Environmental Protection Agency (EPA).

ACTION: Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: EPA is seeking comment on a repellency awareness graphic for
producers of skin-applied insect repellent products to voluntarily
place on repellent product labels. This is part of a voluntary, ongoing
effort to enhance public health information on, and to improve the
clarity of, pesticide product labeling for consumers. Under this
effort, producers of skin-applied insect repellent products can seek to
use a standardized repellency awareness graphic that will clearly
communicate to consumers the estimated number of hours mosquitoes and/
or ticks are repelled by a product when used as directed. With this
notice, EPA is also seeking comment on a guidance document that
describes the recommended criteria and processes for companies to
voluntarily request the use of this graphic.

DATES: Comments must be received on or before March 6, 2014.

ADDRESSES: Submit your comments, identified by docket identification
(ID) number EPA-HQ-OPP-2013-0406, by one of the following methods:
     Federal eRulemaking Portal: http://www.regulations.gov.
Follow the online instructions for submitting comments. Do not submit
electronically any information you consider to be Confidential Business
Information (CBI) or other information whose disclosure is restricted
by statute.
     Mail: OPP Docket, Environmental Protection Agency Docket
Center (EPA/DC), (28221T), 1200 Pennsylvania Ave. NW., Washington, DC
20460-0001.
     Hand Delivery: To make special arrangements for hand
delivery or delivery of boxed information, please follow the
instructions at http://www.epa.gov/dockets/contacts.htm.
    Additional instructions on commenting or visiting the docket, along
with more information about dockets generally, is available at http://www.epa.gov/dockets.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Rose Kyprianou, Field and External
Affairs Division (7506P), Office of Pesticide Programs, Environmental
Protection Agency, 1200 Pennsylvania Ave. NW., Washington, DC 20460-
0001; telephone number:<PHONE_NUMBER>; fax number:<PHONE_NUMBER>;
email address<EMAIL_ADDRESS>
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

I. General Information

A. What is the agency's authority for taking this action?

    Sections 2 through 34 of the Federal Insecticide, Fungicide, and
Rodenticide Act (FIFRA) (7 U.S.C. 136-136y).

B. Does this action apply to me?

    You may be potentially affected by this action if you manufacture,
distribute, sell, or use skin-applied insect repellent products. The
following list of North American Industrial Classification System
(NAICS) codes is not intended to be exhaustive, but rather provides a
guide to help readers determine whether this document applies to them.
Potentially affected entities may include:
     Manufacturers of these products, which includes pesticide
and other agricultural chemical manufacturers (NAICS code 325320), as
well as other manufacturers in similar industries such as cosmetics
(NAICS code 325620).
     Manufacturers who may also be distributors of these
products, which includes drug and druggists' merchant wholesalers
(NAICS code 424210).
     Retailers of skin-applied insect repellent products (some
of which may also be manufacturers), which includes nursery, garden
center, and farm supply stores (NAICS code 444220), supermarkets (NAICS
code 445110), and sporting goods stores (NAICS code 451110).
     Users of skin-applied insect repellent products, including
the general public, as well as landscaping services (NAICS code
561730), sports and recreation institutions (NAICS code 611620), child
daycare services (NAICS code 624410), and recreational and vacation
camps (NAICS code 721214).

C. What should I consider as I prepare my comments for EPA?

    1. Submitting CBI. Do not submit this information to EPA through
regulations.gov or email. Clearly mark the part or all of the
information that you claim to be CBI. For CBI information in a disk or
CD-ROM that you mail to EPA, mark the outside of the disk or CD-ROM as
CBI and then identify electronically within the disk or

CD-ROM the specific information that is claimed as CBI. In addition to
one complete version of the comment that includes information claimed
as CBI, a copy of the comment that does not contain the information
claimed as CBI must be submitted for inclusion in the public docket.
Information so marked will not be disclosed except in accordance with
procedures set forth in 40 CFR part 2.
    2. Tips for preparing your comments. When submitting comments,
remember to:
    i. Identify the document by docket ID number and other identifying
information (subject heading, Federal Register date and page number).
    ii. Follow directions. The Agency may ask you to respond to
specific questions or organize comments by referencing a Code of
Federal Regulations (CFR) part or section number.
    iii. Explain why you agree or disagree; suggest alternatives and
substitute language for your requested changes.
    iv. Describe any assumptions and provide any technical information
and/or data that you used.
    v. If you estimate potential costs or burdens, explain how you
arrived at your estimate in sufficient detail to allow for it to be
reproduced.
    vi. Provide specific examples to illustrate your concerns and
suggest alternatives.
    vii. Explain your views as clearly as possible, avoiding the use of
profanity or personal threats.
    viii. Make sure to submit your comments by the comment period
deadline identified.

II. Overview

    EPA is preparing to launch a new voluntary effort to enhance public
health information and to improve the clarity of pesticide product
labeling for consumers. Producers of skin-applied insect repellent
products can seek to use a standardized repellency awareness graphic
that will clearly communicate to consumers the estimated number of
hours mosquitoes and/or ticks are repelled by the product when used as
directed. Participation will be voluntary and has been developed for
producers of skin-applied insect repellent products subject to FIFRA
registration requirements.
    With this announcement, EPA is seeking public comment on the
graphic as well as a guidance document that is intended to assist
producers in understanding the process for requesting and obtaining
approval for the use of the graphic (Ref. 1). Taking into consideration
comments provided by the various stakeholders described in the
following paragraphs, the guidance identifies the credible information
and scientific underpinning that the Agency generally believes is
necessary to support the information provided in the repellency
awareness graphic. Additionally, the guidance describes for companies
and EPA scientists a method for calculating the number of hours for the
repellency claim(s) that would be included as part of the repellency
awareness graphic. The guidance also describes the process for
requesting use of the graphic through applications for new or amended
registrations.
    EPA believes the approach to determine repellency claim(s)
described in the guidance strikes a reasonable balance between rigorous
testing design and cost containment. For example, some stakeholder
comments suggested a more standardized testing methodology. While this
may enhance consistency across tests, it would drive up costs. Since
the objective of efficacy testing is to assess and characterize the
general performance of each repellent rather than permit rigorous
comparisons across products, EPA believes that the approach outlined in
the guidance will give reasonably consistent predictions to consumers
while ensuring that this program is affordable for companies to
implement and flexible enough to allow for future advances in
scientific testing methodology.
    EPA is making available information on a Web page for consumers
(http://www.epa.gov/pesticides/insect/repellency-awareness.html) that
describes the graphic and how to interpret as well as providing
examples of the graphic. In the future, EPA will be launching a new,
detailed Web page on insect repellents. The new page will include a
list of the products approved by EPA to use the graphic on the product
label. Additionally, the new page will provide general information to
the public about preventative measures consumers can take to protect
themselves and their families from mosquito and tick bites and the
potential diseases they may transmit. When launched, the final URL for
the program will be http://www2.epa.gov/insect-repellents.

III. Background

    The repellency awareness graphic was created in response to
feedback obtained through focus groups and a national online survey
conducted by EPA in 2010 and 2011, respectively (Ref. 2). During the
focus groups and survey, consumers indicated that they wanted
information about which types of insects are repelled and the number of
hours those insects are repelled. Most consumers were aware that
mosquitoes and ticks can carry potentially dangerous diseases, and they
wanted to know how long they may be protected from those pests.
Consumers also responded that they would like this information to be
clear, concise, and in large print on product labels.
    EPA intends for the repellency awareness graphic to address these
consumer needs. The repellency awareness graphic is intended to be
displayed prominently on participating products for quick and easy
identification by the consumer. Prototypes of this graphic were
presented to the consumers participating in the focus groups and
national survey, with consumers indicating that they understood the
meaning of the information in the graphic, and that they would be
likely to look for this graphic when shopping for skin-applied insect
repellents (Ref. 2).
    To ensure that a variety of issues and opinions were considered
during the development of this effort, EPA requested feedback from
several key stakeholder groups. Starting in May 2012, EPA presented the
concept, draft guidance document, and draft graphic to OPP's federal
advisory committee, the Pesticide Program Dialogue Committee (PPDC),
which represents various industry groups, non-governmental
organizations, public health professionals, state, local, and tribal
governments, and federal agencies (Refs. 3-5). Also beginning in May
2012, EPA asked state regulatory officials participating in the State-
FIFRA Issues Research Evaluation Group's Pesticide Operations and
Management (SFIREG POM) working committee for their reactions to the
idea (Refs. 6-8). Additionally, in March 2013, EPA presented and
received independent scientific advice from the Scientific Advisory
Panel (SAP) on certain aspects of the effort (Ref. 9). EPA's responses
to the SAP's comments relating to the repellency awareness graphic are
available in the docket for this notice (Ref. 10).
    Throughout the development of this effort, EPA has also
collaborated with experts at other federal agencies such as the Centers
for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) and the U.S. Department of
Agriculture (USDA), among others. The USDA and CDC have supported EPA's
efforts to provide clear and readily visible information about
repellent products to consumers. The CDC has indicated that the graphic
appears to complement their efforts to promote effective personal
protection activities for the prevention of vector-

borne diseases such as West Nile virus and Lyme disease (Ref. 11).

IV. Request for Comment

    EPA is providing this opportunity for the public to provide
comments and input on the new repellency awareness graphic before it is
implemented. Specifically, the Agency requests comment on the
following:
     Would addition of the repellency awareness graphic help
you choose an insect repellent; would it improve the clarity of label
information?
     Is the repellency awareness graphic's design, as shown on
the program's Web page, easy to understand?
     What information would be helpful to have on our Web site
about repellency awareness? Is the current information useful and clear
to you?
    EPA is also seeking comment on a guidance document that describes
the recommended criteria and processes for companies to voluntarily
request the use of this graphic. While EPA does not intend to formally
respond to all comments that are submitted, they will be taken into
consideration as EPA finalizes the repellency awareness graphic and
guidance. If substantive comments are received, EPA may, if necessary
and appropriate, revise aspects of the graphic or the guidance. In
addition, EPA may decide in response to any comments, to provide
additional helpful information through the Web site.

V. References

    As indicated under ADDRESSES, a docket has been established for
this notice under docket ID number EPA-HQ-OPP-2013-0406. The following
is a listing of the documents that are specifically referenced in this
action.

1. U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA). Office of Pesticide
Programs (OPP). Repellency Awareness Guidance. For Skin-Applied
Insect Repellent Producers. August 2013. Document ID No.: 730-C-13-
001. Docket ID No.: EPA-HQ-OPP-2013-0406.
2. EPA. OPP. Insect Repellent Product Labeling Consumer Survey
Report. April 2012. Docket ID No.: EPA-HQ-OPP-2013-0406.
3. EPA. OPP. Pesticide Program Dialogue Committee, May 3-4, 2012
Meeting. http://www.epa.gov/pesticides/ppdc/2012/may/meeting.html.
4. EPA. OPP. Pesticide Program Dialogue Committee, November 29-30,
2012 Meeting. http://www.epa.gov/pesticides/ppdc/2012/november/nov-mtg.html.
5. EPA. OPP. Pesticide Program Dialogue Committee, July 10-11, 2013
Meeting. http://www.epa.gov/pesticides/ppdc/2013/july/july2013-mtg.html.
6. State-FIFRA Issues, Research, and Evaluation Group (SFIREG)
Pesticides Operations and Management (POM) Working Committee. Final
SFIREG POM Meeting Minutes for May 30-31, 2012. http://www.aapco.org/meetings/minutes/2012/may30/pom_mins_05_2012.pdf.
7. SFIREG POM Working Committee. Final SFIREG POM Meeting Minutes
for September 17-18, 2012. http://www.aapco.org/meetings/minutes/2012/sep17/pom_mins_09_2012.pdf.
8. SFIREG POM Working Committee. Final SFIREG POM Meeting Minutes
for April 22-23, 2013. http://www.aapco.org/meetings/minutes/2013/apr22/final_pom_mins_04_2013.pdf.
9. EPA. Scientific Advisory Panel (SAP). March 19-21, 2013:
Scientific Issues Concerning the Draft Product Performance Data
Needs Assessment for Products Claiming Efficacy Against Invertebrate
Pests. Background documents available at Docket ID No.: EPA-HQ-OPP-
2012-0574. Additional information available at http://www.epa.gov/scipoly/sap/meetings/2013/031913meeting.html.
10. EPA. OPP. EPA Response to Scientific Advisory Panel Comments
Related to the Proposed Repellency Awareness Graphic. September
2013. Docket ID No. EPA-HQ-OPP-2013-0406.
11. Kyprianou, Rose. Memorandum on Federal Interagency Consultations
During Development of the Repellency Awareness Graphic. September
2013. Docket ID No.: EPA-HQ-OPP-2013-0406.

List of Subjects

    Environmental protection, Administrative practice and procedure,
Agricultural commodities, Pesticides and pests.

    Dated: October 28, 2013.
James Jones,
Assistant Administrator, Office of Chemical Safety and Pollution
Prevention.
[FR Doc. 2013-26244 Filed 11-5-13; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6560-50-P


from table 7 of rm# 34884 species year stage entrained. est anchoa mitchilli 1977 larvae 9.80E+ 07 menidia menidia 1977 larvae 9.60E+ 06 sygnathus fuscus 1977 larvae 2.10E+ 06 microbobins thalissinus 1977 larvae 6.40E+ 06 gobiosoma sp. 1977 larvae 2.20E+ 07 other 1977 larvae 5.90E+ 06 larvae sumcheck 1.44E+ 08 table 7 stated total 1.50E+ 08 from table 6 of rm# 34884 anchoa mitchilli 1977 egg 1.90E+ 09 trinectes maculatus 1977 egg 5.40E+ 08 egg sumcheck 2.44E+ 09 table6 stated total 2.40E+ 09 table7 SELECTED MONTHS TO CHECK TABLE INTEGRITY IMPLIED FLOW SHOULD MATCH WITHIN M LARVAE anchoa menidia number n/ 1000m3 implied flow 1000m3 number n/ 1000m3 implied flow 1000m3 9.30E+ 05 7.4 125,676 4.40E+ 06 33.8 130,178 1.20E+ 07 94.6 126,850 1.70E+ 06 13.7 124,088 3.10E+ 06 24.5 126,531 5.90E+ 05 4.9 120,408 9.80E+ 07 63.3 1,548,183 9.80E+ 06 6.3 1,555,556 table6 SELECTED MONTHS TO CHECK TABLE INTEGRITY IMPLIED FLOW SHOULD MATCH WITHIN M EGGS anchoa trinectes number n/ 1000m3 implied flow 1000m3 number n/ 1000m3 implied flow 1000m3 1.30E+ 05 1 130,000 0 0 1.80E+ 08 1429.3 125,936 2.60E+ 06 19.7 131,980 1.30E+ 09 10419.9 124,761 1.90E+ 08 1528.3 124,321 3.30E+ 08 2592.1 127,310 1.90E+ 08 1470 129,252 1.90E+ 09 1227.4 1,547,988 5.40E+ 08 348.8 1,548,165 YORKTOWN . not. model 2 Y/ TIDAL RIVER VA N MONTH FOR SEPARATE SPECIES sygnathus number n/ 1000m3 implied flow 1000m3 6.40E+ 05 5.4 118,519 5.90E+ 05 4.4 134,091 3.60E+ 05 2.9 124,138 2.10E+ 06 1.4 1,500,000 N MONTH FOR SEPARATE SPECIES gpd irrelevant irrelevant midatlantic 711,200,000 cubic meters per gallon: 3.79E 03 cubic meters 2,691,892 NOTE DISCREPANCY BETWEEN TOTAL FLOW IN 1977 VS. FLOW IN CURRENT MASTER FACILITY LISTING annual totals need adjustment for current baseline in model code ta