[Federal Register Volume 78, Number 246 (Monday, December 23, 2013)]
[Notices]
[Pages 77534-77536]
[FR Doc No: 2013-30450]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

[Release No. 34-71104; File No. SR-C2-2013-041]

Self-Regulatory Organizations; C2 Options Exchange, Incorporated;
Notice of Filing and Immediate Effectiveness of Proposed Rule Change To
Extend the Penny Pilot Program

December 17, 2013.
    Pursuant to Section 19(b)(1) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934
(the ``Act'') \1\ and Rule 19b-4 thereunder,\2\ notice is hereby given
that on December 12, 2013, C2 Options Exchange, Incorporated (the
``Exchange'' or ``C2'') filed with the Securities and Exchange
Commission (the ``Commission'') the proposed rule change as described
in Items I and II below, which Items have been prepared by the
Exchange. The Commission is publishing this notice to solicit comments
on the proposed rule change from interested persons.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \1\ 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(1).
    \2\ 17 CFR 240.19b-4.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

I. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement of the Terms of Substance
of the Proposed Rule Change

    The Exchange proposes to proposes to [sic] amend its rules relating
to the Penny Pilot Program. The text of the proposed rule change is
provided below.
(additions are italicized; deletions are [bracketed])
* * * * *

C2 Options Exchange, Incorporated Rules

* * * * *

Rule 6.4. Minimum Increments for Bids and Offers

    The Board of Directors may establish minimum quoting increments for
options traded on the Exchange. When the Board of Directors determines
to change the minimum increments, the Exchange will designate such
change as a stated policy, practice, or

interpretation with respect to the administration of this Rule within
the meaning of subparagraph (3)(A) of subsection 19(b) of the Exchange
Act and will file a rule change for effectiveness upon filing with the
Commission. Until such time as the Board of Directors makes a change to
the minimum increments, the following minimum increments shall apply to
options traded on the Exchange:
    (1) No change.
    (2) No change.
    (3) The decimal increments for bids and offers for all series of
the option classes participating in the Penny Pilot Program are: $0.01
for all option series quoted below $3 (including LEAPS), and $0.05 for
all option series $3 and above (including LEAPS). For QQQQs, IWM, and
SPY, the minimum increment is $0.01 for all option series. The Exchange
may replace any option class participating in the Penny Pilot Program
that has been delisted with the next most actively-traded, multiply-
listed option class, based on national average daily volume in the
preceding six calendar months, that is not yet included in the Pilot
Program. Any replacement class would be added on the second trading day
following [July 1, 2013] January 1, 2014. The Penny Pilot shall expire
on [December 31, 2013] June 30, 2014. Also, for so long as SPDR options
(SPY) and options on Diamonds (DIA) participate in the Penny Pilot
Program, the minimum increments for Mini-SPX Index Options (XSP) and
options on the Dow Jones Industrial Average (DJX), respectively, may be
$0.01 for all option series quoting less than $3 (including LEAPS), and
$0.05 for all option series quoting at $3 or higher (including LEAPS).
* * * * *
    The text of the proposed rule change is also available on the
Exchange's Web site http://www.cboe.com/AboutCBOE/CBOELegalRegulatoryHome.aspx), at the Exchange's Office of the
Secretary, and at the Commission's Public Reference Room.

II. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement of the Purpose of, and
Statutory Basis for, the Proposed Rule Change

    In its filing with the Commission, the Exchange included statements
concerning the purpose of and basis for the proposed rule change and
discussed any comments it received on the proposed rule change. The
text of these statements may be examined at the places specified in
Item IV below. The Exchange has prepared summaries, set forth in
sections A, B, and C below, of the most significant aspects of such
statements.

A. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement of the Purpose of, and the
Statutory Basis for, the Proposed Rule Change

1. Purpose
    The Penny Pilot Program (the ``Pilot Program'') is scheduled to
expire on December 31, 2013. C2 proposes to extend the Pilot Program
until June 30, 2014. C2 believes that extending the Pilot Program will
allow for further analysis of the Pilot Program and a determination of
how the Pilot Program should be structured in the future.
    During this extension of the Pilot Program, C2 proposes that it may
replace any option class that is currently included in the Pilot
Program and that has been delisted with the next most actively traded,
multiply listed option class that is not yet participating in the Pilot
Program (``replacement class''). Any replacement class would be
determined based on national average daily volume in the preceding six
months,\3\ and would be added on the second trading day following
January 1, 2014. C2 will announce to its Trading Permit Holders by
circular any replacement classes in the Pilot Program.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \3\ The month immediately preceding a replacement class's
addition to the Pilot Program (i.e. December) would not be used for
purposes of the six-month analysis. Thus, a replacement class to be
added on the second trading day following January 1, 2014 would be
identified based on The Option Clearing Corporation's trading volume
data from June 1, 2013 through November 30, 2013.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    C2 is specifically authorized to act jointly with the other options
exchanges participating in the Pilot Program in identifying any
replacement class.
2. Statutory Basis
    The Exchange believes the proposed rule change is consistent with
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (the ``Act'') and the rules and
regulations thereunder applicable to the Exchange and, in particular,
the requirements of Section 6(b) of the Act.\4\ Specifically, the
Exchange believes the proposed rule change is consistent with the
Section 6(b)(5) \5\ requirements that the rules of an exchange be
designed to prevent fraudulent and manipulative acts and practices, to
promote just and equitable principles of trade, to foster cooperation
and coordination with persons engaged in regulating, clearing,
settling, processing information with respect to, and facilitation
transactions in securities, to remove impediments to and perfect the
mechanism of a free and open market and a national market system, and,
in general, to protect investors and the public interest. In
particular, the proposed rule change allows for an extension of the
Pilot Program for the benefit of market participants.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \4\ 15 U.S.C. 78f(b).
    \5\ 15 U.S.C. 78f(b)(5).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

B. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement on Burden on Competition

    C2 does not believe that the proposed rule change will impose any
burden on competition that is not necessary or appropriate in
furtherance of the purposes of the Act. Specifically, the Exchange
believes that, by extending the expiration of the Pilot Program, the
proposed rule change will allow for further analysis of the Pilot
Program and a determination of how the Program shall be structured in
the future. In doing so, the proposed rule change will also serve to
promote regulatory clarity and consistency, thereby reducing burdens on
the marketplace and facilitating investor protection. In addition, the
Exchange has been authorized to act jointly in extending the Pilot
Program and believes the other exchanges will be filing similar
extensions.

C. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement on Comments on the Proposed
Rule Change Received From Members, Participants or Others

    The Exchange neither solicited nor received comments on the
proposed rule change.

III. Date of Effectiveness of the Proposed Rule Change and Timing for
Commission Action

    The Exchange has filed the proposed rule change pursuant to Section
19(b)(3)(A)(iii) of the Act \6\ and Rule 19b-4(f)(6) thereunder.\7\
Because the proposed rule change does not: (i) Significantly affect the
protection of investors or the public interest; (ii) impose any
significant burden on competition; and (iii) become operative prior to
30 days from the date on which it was filed, or such shorter time as
the Commission may designate if consistent with the protection of
investors and the public interest, the proposed rule change has become
effective pursuant to Section 19(b)(3)(A) of the Act \8\ and Rule 19b-
4(f)(6)(iii) thereunder.\9\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \6\ 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(3)(A)(iii).
    \7\ 17 CFR 240.19b-4(f)(6).
    \8\ 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(3)(A).
    \9\ 17 CFR 240.19b-4(f)(6)(iii).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    A proposed rule change filed under Rule 19b-4(f)(6) normally does
not become operative prior to 30 days after

the date of the filing.\10\ However, pursuant to Rule 19b-
4(f)(6)(iii),\11\ the Commission may designate a shorter time if such
action is consistent with the protection of investors and the public
interest. The Exchange has asked the Commission to waive the 30-day
operative delay so that the proposal may become operative immediately
upon filing. The Commission believes that waiving the 30-day operative
delay is consistent with the protection of investors and the public
interest because doing so will allow the Pilot Program to continue
without interruption in a manner that is consistent with the
Commission's prior approval of the extension and expansion of the Pilot
Program and will allow the Exchange and the Commission additional time
to analyze the impact of the Pilot Program.\12\ Accordingly, the
Commission designates the proposed rule change as operative upon filing
with the Commission.\13\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \10\ 17 CFR 240.19b-4(f)(6). In addition, Rule 19b-4(f)(6)(iii)
requires the Exchange to give the Commission written notice of the
Exchange's intent to file the proposed rule change along with a
brief description and the text of the proposed rule change, at least
five business days prior to the date of filing of the proposed rule
change, or such shorter time as designated by the Commission. The
Exchange has satisfied this pre-filing requirement.
    \11\ 17 CFR 240.19b-4(f)(6)(iii).
    \12\ See Securities Exchange Act Release No. 61061 (November 24,
2009), 74 FR 62857 (December 1, 2009) (SR-NYSEArca-2009-44).
    \13\ For purposes only of waiving the operative delay for this
proposal, the Commission has considered the proposed rule's impact
on efficiency, competition, and capital formation. See 15 U.S.C.
78c(f).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    At any time within 60 days of the filing of the proposed rule
change, the Commission summarily may temporarily suspend such rule
change if it appears to the Commission that such action is necessary or
appropriate in the public interest, for the protection of investors, or
otherwise in furtherance of the purposes of the Act.

IV. Solicitation of Comments

    Interested persons are invited to submit written data, views, and
arguments concerning the foregoing, including whether the proposed rule
change is consistent with the Act. Comments may be submitted by any of
the following methods:

Electronic Comments

     Use the Commission's Internet comment form (http://www.sec.gov/rules/sro.shtml); or
     Send an email to<EMAIL_ADDRESS>Please include
File Number SR-C2-2013-041 on the subject line.

Paper Comments

     Send paper comments in triplicate to Elizabeth M. Murphy,
Secretary, Securities and Exchange Commission, 100 F Street NE.,
Washington, DC 20549-1090.

All submissions should refer to File Number SR-C2-2013-041. This file
number should be included on the subject line if email is used. To help
the Commission process and review your comments more efficiently,
please use only one method. The Commission will post all comments on
the Commission's Internet Web site (http://www.sec.gov/rules/sro.shtml). Copies of the submission, all subsequent amendments, all
written statements with respect to the proposed rule change that are
filed with the Commission, and all written communications relating to
the proposed rule change between the Commission and any person, other
than those that may be withheld from the public in accordance with the
provisions of 5 U.S.C. 552, will be available for Web site viewing and
printing in the Commission's Public Reference Room, 100 F Street NE.,
Washington, DC 20549, on official business days between the hours of
10:00 a.m. and 3:00 p.m. Copies of the filing also will be available
for inspection and copying at the principal office of the Exchange. All
comments received will be posted without change; the Commission does
not edit personal identifying information from submissions. You should
submit only information that you wish to make available publicly. All
submissions should refer to File Number SR-C2-2013-041 and should be
submitted on or before January 13, 2014.

    For the Commission, by the Division of Trading and Markets,
pursuant to delegated authority.\14\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \14\ 17 CFR 200.30-3(a)(12).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

Kevin M. O'Neill,
Deputy Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2013-30450 Filed 12-20-13; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 8011-01-P


61621 Federal Register / Vol. 67, No. 190 / Tuesday, October 1, 2002 / Notices Description of Alternatives Construction of the FHWA preferred alternative will require removal and modification of Western's transmission system. Western evaluated seven preliminary electrical transmission reconfiguration options as part of the EIS. All options require removal of existing spans and towers and construction of new spans. Three of the options would require removal of the existing A& N Switchyard and replacing a single phase circuit with a doublephase circuit to the Mead Substation ( phase two). Additionally, the Sugarloaf Mountain Alternative requires a realignment of two of the Hoover Mead transmission lines to accommodate the new highway alignment. Western determined the best engineering approach for the phase one and two modifications discussed above based on an evaluation of the electrical conditions on the transmission lines and switchyards and current transmission line construction and electrical standards. The No Action Alternative was evaluated in the EIS and found to not meet the Project purpose and need.

Mitigation Measures The Final EIS identified mitigation measures needed to reduce the impacts of the Project. The specific measures are discussed in the FHWA ROD on pages 22 to 35 and in Chapter 3 of the EIS. Western is adopting those measures that are applicable to its action and will issue a Mitigation Action Plan ( MAP) prior to any construction activities that will address the adopted and standard mitigation measures. Some of the measures include restricting vehicular traffic to existing access roads or public roads, recontouring and reseeding disturbed areas, environmental awareness training for all construction and supervisory personnel, and mitigation of radio and television interference generated by transmission lines. Long term operations of the transmission line will follow Western's standard operating procedures and will not be affected by this action. The mitigation that applies to the construction of the new lines and the upgrading of the existing lines includes the following provisions: 1. Protection of the desert tortoise and banded Gila monster through compliance with the FHWA Biological Opinion. 2. Protection of Cultural and Historical resources as signators to the Programmatic Agreement. 3. Adoption of mitigation measures as specified in the FWHA EIS. 4. Monitor actions for compliance with Western's standard mitigation measures. This ROD has been prepared in accordance with Council on Environmental Quality regulations for implementing NEPA ( 40 CFR parts 1500   1508) and DOE Procedures for Implementing NEPA ( 10 CFR part 1021). Upon approval, the MAP will be made available.

Dated: September 20, 2002. Michael S. Hacskaylo, Administrator. [ FR Doc. 02   24862 Filed 9   30   02; 8: 45 am]

BILLING CODE 6450   01   P ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY [ FRL   7386   6]

Agency Information Collection Activities: Submission for OMB Review; Comment Request; Criteria for Classification of Solid Waste Disposal Facilities and Practices, Recordkeeping and Reporting Requirements   40 CFR Part 257, Subpart B AGENCY: Environmental Protection Agency ( EPA). ACTION: Notice.

SUMMARY: In compliance with the Paperwork Reduction Act ( 44 U. S. C. 3501 et seq.), this document announces that the following Information Collection Request ( ICR) has been forwarded to the Office of Management and Budget ( OMB) for review and approval: Criteria for Classification of Solid Waste Disposal Facilities and Practices, Recordkeeping and Reporting requirements   40 CFR Part 257, Subpart B, ICR # 1745.04, OMB Control # 2050   0154, expiring September 30, 2002. The ICR describes the nature of the information collection and its expected burden and cost; where appropriate, it includes the actual data collection instrument.

DATES: Comments must be submitted on or before October 31, 2002. ADDRESSES: Send comments, referencing EPA ICR No. 1745.04 and OMB Control No. 2050   0154, to the following addresses: Susan Auby, U. S. Environmental Protection Agency, Collection Strategies Division ( Mail Code 2822T), 1200 Pennsylvania Avenue, NW., Washington, DC 20460   0001; and to Office of Information and Regulatory Affairs, Office of Management and Budget ( OMB), Attention: Desk Officer for EPA, 725 17th Street, NW., Washington, DC 20503.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: For a copy of the ICR contact Susan Auby at EPA by phone at ( 202) 566   1672, by e mail at auby. susan@ epa. gov, or download off the Internet at http:// www. epa. gov/ icr and refer to EPA ICR No. 1745.04. For technical questions about the ICR contact Paul Cassidy at 703   308   7281 in the Office of Solid Waste.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Criteria for Classification of Solid Waste Disposal Facilities and Practices, Recordkeeping and Reporting Requirements   40 CFR Part 257, Subpart B , OMB Control No. 2050   0154, EPA ICR No. 1745.04, expiring September 30, 2002. This is a request for extension of a currently approved collection. In order to effectively implement and enforce final changes to 40 CFR part 257, subpart B on a State level, owners/ operators of construction and demolition waste landfills that receive CESQG hazardous wastes will have to comply with the final reporting and recordkeeping requirements. The 1984 Hazardous and Solid Waste Amendments ( HSWA) to the Resource Conservation and Recovery Act ( RCRA), as amended, mandated that the U. S. Environmental Protection Agency ( EPA) revise the Criteria for Solid Waste Disposal Facilities that may receive household hazardous wastes and conditionally exempt small quantity generator ( CESQG) wastes. EPA submitted a Report to Congress in October 1988 that assessed the impacts on human health and the environment associated with Subtitle D ( nonhazardous waste) units. While this study found that the revised Criteria for municipal solid waste disposal units were necessary to protect human health and the environment, the report failed to draw a conclusion relating to industrial Subtitle D units. The limited data on such units indicated that there might be a basis for concern and further study was needed. An agency may not conduct or sponsor, and a person is not required to respond to, a collection of information unless it displays a currently valid OMB control number. The OMB control numbers for EPA's regulations are listed in 40 CFR part 9 and 48 CFR chapter 15. The Federal Register document required under 5 CFR 1320.8( d), soliciting comments on this collection of information was published on May 1, 2002 ( 67 FR 21668); no comments were received. Burden Statement: The annual public reporting and record keeping VerDate Sep< 04> 2002 20: 26 Sep 30, 2002 Jkt 200001 PO 00000 Frm 00048 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 E:\ FR\ FM\ 01OCN1. SGM 01OCN1 61622 Federal Register / Vol. 67, No. 190 / Tuesday, October 1, 2002 / Notices burden for this collection of information is estimated to average 67 hours per response. Burden means the total time, effort, or financial resources expended by persons to generate, maintain, retain, or disclose or provide information to or for a Federal agency. This includes the time needed to review instructions; develop, acquire, install, and utilize technology and systems for the purposes of collecting, validating, and verifying information, processing and maintaining information, and disclosing and providing information; adjust the existing ways to comply with any previously applicable instructions and requirements; train personnel to be able to respond to a collection of information; search data sources; complete and review the collection of information; and transmit or otherwise disclose the information. Respondents/ Affected Entities: Construction and demolition waste landfill owners/ operators and State Agencies. Estimated Number of Respondents: 145. Frequency of Response: On occasion. Estimated Total Annual Hour Burden: 9,675 hours. Estimated Total Annualized Capital, O& M Cost Burden: $ 938. Send comments on the Agency's need for this information, the accuracy of the provided burden estimates, and any suggested methods for minimizing respondent burden, including through the use of automated collection techniques to the addresses listed above. Please refer to EPA ICR No. 1745.04 and OMB Control No. 2050   0154 in any correspondence.

Dated: September 2, 2002. Oscar Morales, Director, Collection Strategies Division. [ FR Doc. 02   24805 Filed 9   30   02; 8: 45 am]

BILLING CODE 6560   50   P ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY [ UT   001   0050; FRL   7388   2]

Adequacy Status of the Utah County, Utah PM10 State Implementation Plan Revision for Transportation Conformity Purposes AGENCY: Environmental Protection Agency ( EPA). ACTION: Notice of adequacy.

SUMMARY: In this document, EPA is notifying the public that we have found that the motor vehicle emissions budgets ( for 2010 and 2020) in the Utah County, Utah particulate matter of 10 micrograms in size or smaller ( PM10) State Implementation Plan ( SIP) revision submitted on July 3, 2002, are adequate for conformity purposes. On March 2, 1999, the D. C. Circuit Court ruled that submitted SIPs cannot be used for conformity determinations until EPA has affirmatively found them adequate. As a result of our finding, the Mountainland Association of Governments, the Utah Department of Transportation, and the U. S. Department of Transportation are required to use the 2010 and 2020 motor vehicle emissions budgets from this submitted SIP revision for future conformity determinations. DATES: This finding is effective October 16, 2002.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Kerri Fiedler, Air & Radiation Program ( 8P   AR), United States Environmental Protection Agency, Region 8, 999 18th Street, Suite 300, Denver, Colorado 80202   2466, ( 303) 312   6493. The letter documenting our finding is available at EPA's conformity website: http:// www. epa. gov/ oms/ transp/ conform/ adequacy. htm.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Throughout this document wherever `` we,'' `` us,'' or `` our'' are used we mean EPA. This action is simply an announcement of a finding that we have already made. We sent a letter to the Utah Department of Environmental Quality on September 5, 2002 stating that the 2010 and 2020 PM10 and NOX motor vehicle emissions budgets in the submitted Utah County PM10 SIP revision are adequate. This finding has also been announced on our conformity website at http:// www. epa. gov/ oms/ transp/ conform/ adequacy. htm. Transportation conformity is required by section 176( c) of the Clean Air Act. Our conformity rule requires that transportation plans, programs, and projects conform to SIPs and establishes the criteria and procedures for determining whether or not they do. Conformity to a SIP means that transportation activities will not produce new air quality violations, worsen existing violations, or delay timely attainment of the national ambient air quality standards. The criteria by which we determine whether a SIP's motor vehicle emission budgets are adequate for conformity purposes are outlined in 40 CFR 93.118( e)( 4). Please note that an adequacy review is separate from our completeness review, and it also should not be used to prejudge our ultimate approval of the SIP. Even if we find a budget adequate, the SIP could later be disapproved, and vice versa. We've described our process for determining the adequacy of submitted SIP budgets in a memo entitled, `` Conformity Guidance on Implementation of March 2, 1999 Conformity Court Decision,'' dated May 14, 1999. We followed this guidance in making our adequacy determination.

Authority: 42 U. S. C. 7401 et seq.

Dated: September 23, 2002.

Robert E. Roberts,

Regional Administrator, Region VIII. [ FR Doc. 02   24916 Filed 9   30   02; 8: 45 am]

BILLING CODE 6560   50   P ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY [ FRL   7387   7]

EPA Science Advisory Board, Notification of Public Advisory Committee Meetings of the Contaminated Sediment Science Plan Review Panel; and Notification of Cancelled Meetings of the Human Health Research Strategy Review Panel Pursuant to the Federal Advisory Committee Act, Public Law 92   463, notice is hereby given of three meetings of the Contaminated Sediment Science Plan Review Panel ( CSSP Review Panel) of the U. S. Environmental Protection Agency's ( EPA) Science Advisory Board ( SAB). The Panel will meet on the dates and times noted below. All times noted are Eastern Time. All meetings are open to the public, however, seating is limited and available on a first come basis. For teleconference meetings, available lines may also be limited. Important Notice: The document that is the subject of this SAB review, Contaminated Sediment Science Plan, June 13, 2002 draft, is available on the SAB Web site at http:// www. epa. gov/ sab/ panels/ cssprpanel. html. Any questions concerning the draft document should be directed to the program contact noted below. Background   The background for this review and the charge to the panel were published in the 67 FR 49336, July 30, 2002. The notice also included a draft charge to the panel, a call for nominations for members of the panel in certain technical expertise areas needed to address the charge and described the process to be used in forming the panel.

VerDate Sep< 04> 2002 20: 26 Sep 30, 2002 Jkt 200001 PO 00000 Frm 00049 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 E:\ FR\ FM\ 01OCN1. SGM 01OCN1


[Federal Register Volume 77, Number 181 (Tuesday, September 18, 2012)]
[Notices]
[Page 57576]
[FR Doc No: 2012-22977]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY

Federal Emergency Management Agency

[Internal Agency Docket No. FEMA-4081-DR; Docket ID FEMA-2012-0002]

Mississippi; Amendment No. 5 to Notice of a Major Disaster
Declaration

AGENCY: Federal Emergency Management Agency, DHS.

ACTION: Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: This notice amends the notice of a major disaster declaration
for the State of Mississippi (FEMA-4081-DR), dated August 29, 2012, and
related determinations.
    DATES: Effective Date: September 11, 2012.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Peggy Miller, Office of Response and
Recovery, Federal Emergency Management Agency, 500 C Street SW.,
Washington, DC 20472,<PHONE_NUMBER>.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Notice is hereby given that the incident
period for this disaster is closed effective September 11, 2012.

The following Catalog of Federal Domestic Assistance Numbers (CFDA)
are to be used for reporting and drawing funds: 97.030, Community
Disaster Loans; 97.031, Cora Brown Fund; 97.032, Crisis Counseling;
97.033, Disaster Legal Services; 97.034, Disaster Unemployment
Assistance (DUA); 97.046, Fire Management Assistance Grant; 97.048,
Disaster Housing Assistance to Individuals and Households In
Presidentially Declared Disaster Areas; 97.049, Presidentially
Declared Disaster Assistance--Disaster Housing Operations for
Individuals and Households; 97.050, Presidentially Declared Disaster
Assistance to Individuals and Households--Other Needs; 97.036,
Disaster Grants--Public Assistance (Presidentially Declared
Disasters); 97.039, Hazard Mitigation Grant.

W. Craig Fugate,
Administrator, Federal Emergency Management Agency.
[FR Doc. 2012-22977 Filed 9-17-12; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 9111-23-P